Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1986-11-10 Agendas I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 10, 1986 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. PZ 86-46 Reconsideration of Amendment to Zoning Ordinance 1080 to Permit Incentive Increases in Apartment Zoning with Planned Development Controls, Ordinance No. 1409 (Denied at the October 13, 1986 City Council Meeting) (Agenda Item No.7) (Suggested Discussion Time - 10 Minutes) 2. PZ 86-51 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Revision to Section XXII of the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Parking Requirements for Elementary and Junior High Schools, Ordinance No. 1416 (Agenda Item No. 14) (Suggested Discussion Time - 10 Minutes) 3. PZ 86-52 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Zoning Ordinance Revision, Section XXIV, Regarding Screening Fences for High-rise Buildings, Ordinance No. 1417 (Agenda Item No. 15) (Suggested Discussion Time - 15 Minutes) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 4. SO 86-15 Proposed Revisions to the Sign Ordinance Governing Real Estate Directional Signs, Ordinance No. 1418 (Agenda Item No. 20) (Suggested Discussion Time - 5 Minutes) 5. GN 86-101 Support for Certification of all Coaches in Youth Sports Program, Resolution No. 86-39 (Agenda Item No. 21) (Suggested Discussion Time - 5 Minutes) 6. GN 86-120 Revised Plan for Library/Recreational Renovation (Agenda Item No. 22) (Suggested Discussion Time - 10 Minutes) 7. GN 86-121 New Animal Control Ordinance, Ordinance No. 1412 (Agenda Item No. 23) (Suggested Discussion Time - 10 Minutes) 8. GN 86-123 Proposed Objection to Zoning Case in Fort Worth (Agenda Item No. 25) (Suggested Discussion Time - 5 Minutes) 9. Other Items I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 10. *Executive Session to Discuss Land, Personnel, and/or Litigation (Suggested Discussion Time - 20 Minutes) *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 10, 1986 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting October 27, 1986 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27 & 28) 7. PZ 86-46 Reconsideration of'Amendment to Zoning Ordinance 1080 to Permit Incentive Increases in Apartment Zoning with Planned Development Controls, Ordinance No. 1409 (Denied at the October 13, 1986 City Council Meeting) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. PZ 86-47 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Hamm and Sandlin to rezone Lot 1, Block 30, Holiday North Addition from R-7 MF (Multi-family) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located on the west side of Davis Boulevard south of the TESCO Power Line Easement) 9. Ordinance No. 1413 10. PZ 86-48 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of North Richland Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 1A2, John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753 from R-7 MF (Multi-family) to 1-2 (Industrial) (Located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive and the north side,of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad) 11. Ordinance No. 1414 12. PZ 86-50 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Birdville I.S.D. to rezone Tract 4A, 4A1, 4A2, 4AIA, 4AIB and 4A1C, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311 from AG (Agriculture) to U (Institutional) (Located on the southeast corner of Douglas Lane and Starnes Road) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 13. Ordinance No. 1415 14. PZ 86-51 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Revision to Section XXII of the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Parking Requirements for Elementary and Junior High Schools, Ordinance No. 1416 15. PZ 86-52 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Zoning Ordinance Revision, Section XXIV, Regarding Screening Fences for High-rise Buildings, Ordinance No. 1417 *16. PS 86-36 Request of Jack Knowles for Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 13, Fair Oaks Addition, (Located on the southeast corner of Bursey Road at Smithfield Road) *17. PS 86-39 Request of Bill Fenimore, Wayne Wright, Charles Wright and J.V. Frank for Replat of Lot 20R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition (Located on the southwest corner of Glenview Drive and Dawn Drive) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *18. PS 86-44 Request of Burk Collins Investments for Final Plat of Stonybrooke South Addition (Located on the north side of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad south of the existing Stonybrooke Addition) *19. PS 86-45 Request of George Moore for Replat of Lots 14-R2A and 14-R2B, Block 17, Oak Hills Addition (Located on the north side of Meandering Way west of Precinct Line Road) *20. SO 86-15 Proposed Revisions to the Sign Ordinance Governing Real Estate Directional Signs, Ordinance No. 1418 *21. GN 86-101 Support for Certifi~ation of all Coaches in Youth Sports Program, Resolution No. 86-39 *22. GN 86-120 Revised Plan for Library/Recreational Renovation *23. GN 86-121 New Animal Control Ordinance, Ordinance No. 1412 24. GN 86-122 Appointments to Cable Television Board and Library Board I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 5 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *25. GN 86-123 Proposed Objection to Zoning Case in Fort Worth *26. GN 86-124 Authorization for Mayor to Execute Amendment to City Manager's Contract, Resolution No. 86-46 *27. PU 86-29 Award of Bid for Five Full Size Police Package Four Door Sedans to Jack Williams Chevrolet *28. PU 86-30 Award of Bid for Air Monitoring and Testing-Asbestos Abatement Program - Public Library and Recreation Center 29. Citizen Presentation 30. Adjournment I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of j\{ðrth Richland Hills, Texas November 6, 1986 Memo to: Mayor & City Council From: Rodger N. Line, City Manager Subject: Proposed Revisions to the Sign Ordinance I intended to discuss this item at Pre-Council but there was not enough time. It is being given to you in advance for your review and will be placed on a subsequent agenda for discussion. ~ ~ RL:ph Attachment (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 I I I City of J{órth Richland Hills~ Texas I I MEMORANDUM November 10, 1986 I TO: City Council Richard Royston, ~ / Director of Planning and Development ~~ I FROM: SUBJECT: Proposed Revisions to the Sign Ordinance I I Included in the City Council agenda for November 10, 1986 is a proposed revision to the Sign Ordinance covering the control of the Development or "Bandit" Sign. The Staff has, while developing that revision, reviewed the entire text of the Ordinance and has determined that the most effective approach to revising the Ordinance would be a comprehensive rewrite of the document. I I I Major revisions to the text of the Ordinance are to be found in the following sections. 1. Section 3.9 Filing and Permit Fees: The fee schedule has been upgraded to reflect the administrative costs currently being experienced. I 2. Section 6.2 Real Estate Signs: This section has been completely rewritten as noted in the City Council agenda. I I 3. Section 6.3 Subdivision--New Development Signs: This section has been revised to allow for off-site development signs to be placed in Commercial and Industrial Districts on vacant properties. Also the provision allowing off-site signs to be placed on residential properties whether they are occupied or vacant has been eliminated. I I Generally, the text of the Ordinance has been modified to transfer the responsibility of the administration of the Ordinance to the Planning and Development Department under the direct control of the Building Official. - I I (817) 281-0041(7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TX 76180 I I The Staff would request that the City Council review and comment on the proposed changes in the Sign Ordinance. When the comments have been received and incorporated we will place the Ordinance on ,the City Council agenda for action. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ORDINANCE NO. ------.-. AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; DEFINING 'TERMS; REQUIRING A PERMIT FOR ERECTION OF A SIGN AND PROVIDING FOR A SCHEDULE OF FEES; REGULATING THE AREA OF SIGNS PERMITTED; PROVIDING FOR A SERIES OF GENERAL CONDITIONS; REGULATING TEMPORARY SIGNS; REGULATING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF SIGNS; REGULATING BILLBOARDS; PROHIBITING OBNOXIOUS SIGNS AND SIGNS EXPLOITING SEX; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF A FINE NOT LESS THAN $50.00 NOR IN EXCESS OF $1000.00; AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HERETO; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE IN FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER THE DATE OF ITS ADOPTION AND PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: ARTICLE 1. PREAMBLE: PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE The sign regulations as herein established have been made for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of North Richland Hills. The Ordinance contains standards regulating the use, size, location, construction and maintenance of signs. The intent of the regulations is to protect values within the City of North Richland Hills, to enhance the beauty of the City and to protect the general public from damage and injury which may be caused by the unregulated construction of signs. ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS SECTION 2.1 AREA OF SIGN. "Area of Sign" shall mean the total area within the extreme perimeter of the attraction area intended to draw attention to the sign, including all open spaces and supports which the sign rest upon if said supports are designed to attract attention to sign. The area of the sign with two (2) faces, approximately opposed, shall be that of the larger face if such condition prevails; but, if the angle between the planes of the faces exceeds thirty (30) degrees the total area of both faces shall be considered the sign area. For multi-sided or circular, signs, the area shall be the total projected area. SECTION 2.2 BILLBOARD. "Billboard" shall mean any freestanding sign, 'signboard or I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I outdoor advertising display which is used for advertising purposes or display purposes, except advertising displays used exclusively: (a) To advert i se the sa 1 e s or 1 ease of the pr"operty upon which such advertising displays are to be placed. (b) To designate the name of the owner or the occupant of the premises upon which such advertising display is placed, or to identify such premises. (c) To advertise goods manufactured, produced, or for sale or service rendered, on the property upon which such advertising display is placed. SECTION 2.3 BUILDING LINE "Building Line" shall be established by the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2.4 FACE OF BUILDING. "Face of Building" shall mean the general outer surface not including cornices, bay windows, or other ornamental trim, of any main exterior wall of the building. SECTION 2.5 LIMITED ACCESS FREEWAY. "Limited Access Freeway" shall be deemed to mean a highway to which the right of access to or from abutting lands is controlled and restricted by the State of Texas or the City of North Richland Hills. Further, a "Limited Access Freeway" shall be bordered on each side by access roads (or right-of- way for access roads). "Limited Access Freeways" within the City of North Richland Hills are Interstate 820 and Airport Freeway (S8 121) only. SECTION 2.6 GROUND SIGN. "Ground Sign" shall mean a sign not wholly supported on a building on which has its main supporting structure depending upon the ground for attachment. SECTION 2.7 PROJECTING SIGN. I I I I "Projecting Sign" shall mean a sign suspended from or supported from a building or structure and projecting out therefrom more than one (1) foot. SECTION 2.8 ROOF SIGN. "Roof Sign" shall mean any sign supported by the roof of a building or placed above the apparent flat roof or eaves of a building as viewed from any elevation. I I SECTION 2.9 SIGN. ,I I il I "Sign" shall mean a display board, screen, structure, object or part therof, used to announce, declare, demon- strate, display or otherwise advertise and attract the attention of the public to any business, service or product provided on the premises upon which sign is placed, other than: (a) Official notices authorized by a court, public body or public officer; and, (b) directional, warning or information signs authorized by federal, state or municipal authority. SECTION 2.10 TEMPORARY SIGN. I I "Temporary Sign" shall mean a sign, banner, pennant, flag or advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, cardboard, wallboard or other light material with or without frames intended to be displayed for a short period of time only. Trailer and portable signs are classified as "Temporary Signs." I SECTION 2.11 WALL SIGN. I "Wall Sign" shall mean any sign painted on, attached to or projecting from the wall surface of a building (including permanent window sign and signs on awnings and/or marquees). A wall signs shall not project above the apparent flat roof or eave line as viewed from all elevations, or more than one foot from the surface of the wall. I I SECTION 2.12 MARQUEE SIGN. I "Marquee Sign" shall include any hood or awning or permanent construction projecting from the wall of a building or other structure. SECTION 2.13 DEVELOPMENT. I I "Development" shall mean any nonresidential property improvement or properties improved as a unit with a common parking area that is contiguous to the development. A shopping center under single or multiple ownership constitutes a development. I I I I SECTION 2.14 QUALIFIED STREET FRONTAGE. "Qualified Street Frontage" shall mean the width of property of a commercial or industrial development which bears the address of the property. SECTION 2.15 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN. " T r a f f i c Con t r 0 I S i g'n" s hall be any s i gnu sed on 1 y to control and direct traffic on private property (e.g., "ENTER" I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I or "EXIT') without logo or advertising messages. SECTION 2.16 ZONING DISTRICT. "Zoning District" referred to in this ordinance shall be as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of the City Of North Richland Hills, Texas, Ordinance Number 1080 and subsequent amendments. ARTICLE 3. SIGN PERMIT AND FEES SECTION 3.1 SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED. (a) No person shall erect, alter or add to a sign or sign structure, except as provided by this Ordinance and unless a permit for the same has been issued by the Building Official or other person he/she may authorize of the City. Where signs are illuminated by electric lighting, a separate electrical permit shall be obtained as required by the Electrical Code of The City. (b) No sign permit shall be issued for any additional signs or alterations to existing signs until all signs on the property or development conform to the provi- sions of this Ordinance. EXCEPTION: Temporary signs. SECTION 3.2 OFFICIAL, QUASI-OFFICIAL AND DIRECTIONAL SIGN. (a) Nothing herein contained shall prevent the erection, construction and maintenance of official traffic, fire and police signs, signals~--devices and markings of the State, City or other appr~priate governmental authorities, nor the posting of notices required by law. Private and quasi-public signs shall be prohibited upon public property unless authorized by the City of North Richland Hills or other appropriate governmental authorities. (b) Legal notices, telephone and other underground utility warning signs, not exceeding one (1) square foot in size and other safety signs may be erected without a permit being issued. (c) Nonadvertising, directional or informational signs less than six (6) square feet in area may be used without a permit in zoning districts R-7-MF, 0-1, LR, C, I and PD as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills. I I I I I I ,I I , II SECTION 3.3 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT. Application for sign permit shall be made to the Building Department accompanied by the filing fee in the amount provided for by Section 3.8 for each development' on which the sign or signs are to be erected and shall contain or have attached thereto the following information: (a) Name, address and telephone number of the applicant; (b) Location of building, structure or lot to which or upon which the sign or advertising structure is to be attached or erected; (c) Position of the sign or advertising structure in relation to nearby buildings or structures; (d) Two (2) blueprints or ink drawings of the plans and specifications and method of construction and attachment to the buildings or in the ground; I 'I I (e) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the structures are designed for deadload and wind pressure in any direction in the amount required by this and all other laws and ordinances of the City. The Build- ing Code of the City, which is the current edition of the Uniform Building Code, shall apply for design of any sign structure; (f) Name of person, firm, corporation or association erecting structure or painting the sign; (g) Written consent of the owner of the building, structure or land to which or on which the structure is to be erected or sign to be painted. I I I I I I I (h) Any electrica"l permit required and issued for such sign; (i) Estimated sign value; (j) Detailed plans of all existing signs, including photos and/or other pertinent data which will aid in the determination of the sites conformance with this Ordinance; (k) Such other information as the Building Official shall require to show full compliance with this and all other laws and ordinances of the City; (1) In addition to the filing fee, a sign permit fee shall be collected in accordance with the schedule of Section 3.8. SECTION 3.4 NONCONFORMING SIGNS. All applications for sign permits for signs which do not I I I conform to the provisions of this Ordinance or are located on the same property or development on which other signs do not conform with the provisions of this Ordinance shall be submitted by the Building Official to the Director of Planning and Development for review in accordance with the provisions of Article 10 of this Ordinance. I SECTION 3.5 APPROVAL OF TRAFFICE ENGINEER. I I If in the opinion of the Building Official the plans and specifications indicate that the sign or sign structure might interfere with, mislead or confuse traffic, or in any place where a ground sign is to be placed on a corner lot, then the applicant shall submit a traffic engineer certification with the application. SECTION 3.6 ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. I If it shall appear the proposed sign structure is in compliance with all the requirements of this Ordinance and all other laws and ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills and has received approval where necessary, the Building Department shall then issue the sign permit. If the work authorized under a sign permit has not been completed within ninety (90) days or a proper extension granted thereto after date of issuance, the said permit shall become null and void. Issuance of the sign permit shall be conditioned upon the applicant's acceptance of any conditions imposed thereon by the City. No sign permit issued with conditions shall be valid until all conditions have been complied with by the applicant. I I I I I I SECTION 3.7 UNSAFE AND UNLAWFUL SIGNS. I I I I I I (a) Signs and sign structures including those existing prior to this ordinance shall be -maintained at all times in a state of good repair, safe and s'ecure with all braces,' bolts, slips, supporting frame and fastenings free from deteriora- ation, termite infestation, rot, rust or loosening, able to withstand at all times the wind pressure for which they were originally designed. (b) No person maintaining any sign, sign structure or billboard shall fail to keep the ground space within eight (8) feet from the base of the said sign, signboard, billboard or advertising structure free and clear of weeds, rubbish and other flammable waste material. (c) If the Building Official or other person he/she may appoint shall find that any sign or other advertising structure regulated herein as unsafe or insecure, or as a menace to the public, or has been constructed or erected or is being maintained in violation of the provisions of this section, the permittee or owner thereof shall be given written notice. If the permittee or owner fails to remove or alter the structure so as to comply with the standards herein set forth within thirty (30) days after such notice, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I such sign or advertising structure may be removed or altered to comply by the City of North Richland Hills at the expense of the permittee or owner of the property upon which it is located. The Building Official shall refuse to issue any subsequent building, electrical, plumbing or mechanical permits for the property on which the offending sign was located if any owner or permittee shall refuse to pay costs so assessed. The Building Official may cause any sign or other advertising structure which is an immediate peril to persons or property to be removed by giving at least forty-eight (48) hours notice. (d) The Building Official or other person he/she may appoint may cause any illegal temporary sign, including flags, pennants, banners and temporary window signs to be removed within a twenty-four (24) hour period. EXCEPTION: The American and Texas flags may be flown at any time without a permit. SECTION 3.8 FILING AND PERMIT FEES. (a) Permanent signs and billboards: application and plan review fees shall be $50.00 for permenant signs and billboards. Sign permit fees shall be based on the value of the sign in accordance with the following: Monetary Value of Proposed Work Base Fee + Percentage of Estimated Cost 00 - 501 - 1,501 - 3,001 5,001 - 50,001 - 100,001 - 500,001 500 1,500 3,000 5,000 50,000 100,000 500,000 or more $ 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 0.00 + 50.00 + 150.00 + 650.00 + .7% .6% .5% .4% (b) Temporary Signs: a single filing/permit fee of: 1st sign 2nd sign 3rd sign $ 25.00 20.00 15.00 ARTICLE 4. AREA· OF SIGN PERMITTED SECTION 4.1 SIGNS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL. (a) For signing purposes, frontage or private streets that serve as public thoroughfares and not just driveways may, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I with City Council approval, be considered as qualified street frontage. (b) Anyone (1) development may have a choice of, but not more than, one (1) ground sign, one (1) roof sign or one (1) projecting sign, subject to the exceptions contained in Section 4.2 through 4.8. In the case of very large develop- ments (e.g., shopping centers, apartment complexes, etc.) that have substantial frontages on two or more streets (with commercial or industrial zoning on both sides of the streets), additional ground signs may be permitted with special approval from the City Council. SECTION 4.2 GROUND SIGNS. Ground signs are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each 300 linear feet of qualified street frontage with each development in all zoning districts except AG and all of the R districts. (b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be measured as one (1) square foot of area of sign for each linear foot of street frontage, to a maximum area of sign of 300 square feet for anyone sign. (c) The maximum height of any ground sign and its support- ing structure shall be twenty-five (25) feet, except that the height of a ground sign may be increased by adding one (1) foot of height for each linear foot the sign is back from the adjacent property lines, not to exceed a maximum height of fifty (50) feet to the top of the sign. (d) The height of any ground sign may not exceed one-half (1/2) the shortest linear distance from the location of the sign to the nearest boundary of any AG or R zoning districts. (e) The sign shall not project over the property line of the development, right-of-way or over any area within ten (10) feet of the curb of a public street or thoroughfare. (f) A minimum qualified frontage of 100 feet shall be required to erect a ground sign. (g) Permanent attachment to the ground shall be required for all ground signs. SECTION 4.3 ROOF SIGNS. Roof signs permitted are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (1) roof sign may be permitted with each develop- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ment on all zoning districts except AG and R districts. (b) Roof sign shall not project over the edge of the roof or eave. (c) The maximum permitted area of roof signing shall be one (1) square foot of sign area for each linear foot of property frontage not to exceed a maximum of 100 square feet. (d) The height of a roof sign shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the apparent flat roof or eave line. (e) Roof sign supports should be architecturally attractive or screened from view. SECTION 4.4 PROJECTING SIGNS. Projecting signs permitted are subject to the following provisions. (a) One (1) projecting sign may be permitted with each development in all zoning districts except AG and R districts. (b) Projecting signs shall not project over the property line of the development, right-of-way or over any area within ten (10) feet of the curb of a public street or thoroughfare. (c) Projection of sign shall not extend more than four (4) feet from any wall facing. (d) The total permitted area of a projecting sign shall be measured as one (1) square foot of sign area for each linear foot of property frontage not to exceed a maximum of 100' square feet. SECTION 4.5 THEATER MARQUEES. Theater marquees need not be limited to projecting sign criteria, but shall be subjected to individual approval by the City Council. SECTION 4.6 WALL SIGNS: COMMERCIAL ZONES. Wall signs shall be permitted in commercial or industrial zoning dstrict development provided the total area of all wall signs on anyone (1) wall face shall not exceed twenty five (25%) percent also to include valance and permanent window signs. A wall sign shall not project above the apparent flat roof or eave line. SECTION 4.7 SIGNS: RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL ZONES. All signs are prohibited in AG and all R zoning districts except as follows: I I I I I I I I I I I I I (a) Multi-family developments in R-7-MF zoning districts shall be allowed one (1) wall or ground sign for identification purposes only for each street frontage. The area of such signs shall not exceed one (1) square foot per residential unit, or thirty-two (32) square feet, whichever is least. Ground signs in R-7-MF zoning districts shall not exceed a height of four (4) feet above grade. A permit is required for these signs. (b) Wall signs may be used with any residential use in AG and all R zoning districts with exception to R-7-MF, with a maximum area of sign of two (2) square feet per sign with a limit of two (2) signs for anyone (1) occupancy, and may be erected without a permit being issued. (c) In AG zoning districts, legitimate agricultural businesses or enterprises shall be permitted ground, roof, p~ojecting or wall signs in accordance with the restrictions of Sections 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.6 except that the total area of all signs shall not exceed 100 square feet and the height of any ground sign shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet above grade. A permit is required for all these signs. SECTION 4.8 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS. (a) The maximum area of anyone traffic control sign shall be two (2) square feet. (b) Traffic control signs are not permitted in AG and all R zoning districts with exception of the R-7-MF district. (c) Traffic control signs shall not include any advertis- ing or attention attractng_lighting, symbols, logos or shapes. (d) Traffic control signs may pertain to either vehicular or pedestrian traffic. I I ARTICLE 5. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 5.1 INTERFERENCE WITH BUILDING REGULATIONS. I I I I No sign shall be erected in such a manner that any portion of its surface or supports will interfere in anyway with the free use of any fire escape, exit, standpipe, or windows or obstruct any required ventilator or door stairway. SECTION 5.2 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. (a) No sign permit shall be issued for any sign or billboard which encroaches upon or over any City owned or I I I I controlled property unless an encroachment permit therefor is obtained from the City Councilor State agency in charge. (b) No encroachment permit for any sign or billboard shall be issued unless in the opinion of the Building Official the erection and maintenance of said sign shall not imperil the health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such permit may be issued subject to such conditions as the City Council deems to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the public. I I I I SECTION 5.3 PROJECTION OVER PRIVATE PROPERTY. No sign may project more than six (6) inches from the face of a building over private property used or intended to be used by the general public, unless there is a minimum of eight (8) feet clearance from the bottom of the sign to sidewalk or grade immediately below the sign, or a minimum of fourteen (14) feet clearance from the bottom of the sign to a vehicular trafficway immediately below the sign. SECTION 5.4 MEMORIAL SIGNS AND HISTORICAL TABLETS. I I I I I I I Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City Council from granting special permits on such terms as it may deem proper, for signs advertising or pertaining to any civic, patriotic or special event of general public interest taking place within the boundaries of the City, when it is determined that the same will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare., interest or safety, nor injurious to adjacent property or improvements. SECTION 5.6 LIGHTING. (a) Signs may be illuminated or nonilluminated. Illumination may be either by internal, internal-indirect or indirect lighting as· defined in (b), (c) and (d). Lighting sh~ll be so installed as to avoid any glare or reflection into adjacent property, or onto a street or alley to create a traffic suggested that lighting be turned off as soon after business hours as is reasonable, especially for signs in close proximity to residential areas. I I I I (b) "Internal Lighting" means a source of illumination entirely within the sign which makes the contents of the sign visible at night by means of the light being transmitted through a translucent material but wherein the source of the illumination is not visible. (c) "Internal-Indirect Lighting" means a source of illumination entirely -within the sign (generally a free standing letter) which makes the sign visible at night by means of lighting the background upon which the free standing character is mounted. The character itself shall be opaque, and thµs will be silhouetted against the background. The source of illumination shall not be visible. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (d) "Indirect Lighting" means a source of external illumination located a distance away from the sign, which lights the sign, but which itself is not visible to persons viewing the sign from any normal position of view. SECTION 5.7 ROTATING, MOVING, FLASHING, CHANGING OR BLINKING SIGNS. Rotating, moving, flashing, changing or blinking signs shall not be permitted. However, "message signs" (for example: time and temperature, etc.) may be permitted as approved on an individual basis be the City Council, giving adequate consideration to traffic seafety hazards posed by the size and location of the proposed sign. ARTICLE 6. TEMPORARY SIGNS SECTION 6.1 TEMPORARY SIGNS. Excpt as otherwise provided in this Ordinance: (a) No person may erect a temporary sign as defined in Section 2.10 without a permit obtained from the Building Department. (b) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed to advertise a business, industry or pursuit except on the premisese on which the business, industry or pursuit is conducted. (c) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed on any public property or right-of-way, utility pole, light pole, or traffi-G control sign or pole. (d) No temporary sign shall be displayed for more than thirty (30) days per permit received. (e) A maximum of three (3) temporary sign permits per year shall be issued to anyone business, industry or pursuit. (f) Temporary signs shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet in area. (g) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed within fifteen (15) feet of the curb or street except for those which may be mounted on the wall of a building which is closer than fifteen (15) feet to the curb or street. (h) No temporary or portable sign may be erected or placed in any location that constitutes a safety or traffic hazard. I I I (i) Non-conforming temporary signs or temporary signs without permits may be impounded by the City. (j) Each temporary sign may not advertise more than one business unless each business that adverti~es pays for a permit and counts as one of the three allowed per year as stated in Subsection (e). I I I I (k) Trailer and portable sign companies shall bear in letters of not less than one (1) inch in height the company name and telephone number on each unit. These must be current or they will be classified as non- non-conforming signs and subject to Subsection (i). SECTION 6.2 REAL ESTATE SIGNS. Permits shall not be requred for the following types of real estate signs: I I (a) One (1) temporary sign announcing the offering for sale or rental of induvidually platted residential or commercial property on which it is placed shall be allowed in any dis- trict and may be placed in any yard. Such sign shall not exceed five (5) square feet in area; it shall be removed within one (1) week following the close of sale or lease. I I (b) On nonresidential commercial property where there is a business building, one (1) temporary unlighted sign offering all or a portion of the same for sale or rental shall be allowed flat against any wall of the business building. Such sign shall be no taller than the wall and shall have an area no larger than 100 square feet. Such sign shall be removed within one (1) week following the close of sale or lease. I I (c) On undeveloped property, temporary unlighted signs offering the same for sale or lease shall be allowed. Such signs shall be located at least twenty-five (25) feet behind any curb or ten (10) feet behind any property line, whichever greater; and shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. The total area of all sign message surfaces of all such signs shall not exceed one (1) square foot per one (1) lineal foot of street frontage of the property for sale or 100 square feet on each street fronting such property; whichever is smaller. Only one (1) sign per street frontage shall be permitted. Each sign shall be removed within one (1) week following the close of the sale or lease. I I I I I I (d) Six (6) unlighted directional "Open House" signs not to exceed five (5) square feet, may be located on property other than the property which is to be sold, during daylight hours only, and shall be permitted without the issuance of a sign permit; provided, however, that such signs shall not be located upon public right-of-way or within the center divider median of any roadway or be located at any location so as to interfere with the view of traffic at any intersection or driveway. I I I I I I I I (e) Policy for Weekend Builders Advertising. The City of North Richland Hills' Policy for Weekend Adver- tising,as expressed in this policy,is extended to homebuild- ers for the purpose of guiding the weekend motoring public to available residential properties. The policy is intended as a benefit also to the buying public. These provisions are designed to allow temporary directional signs without resulting in an excess that may prove offensive to others of the public. The policy should serve also as "common sense" guidelines in places where direct application is unclear. (1) Schedule: Signs will be allowed between 5PM Friday and 8AM Monday. A holiday falling on Friday or Monday will be considered part of the weekend. (2) Sign Size: Signs shall not exceed 24" by 30" in size, nor be installed more than 3 feet above grade. (3) Spacing of Signs: A minimum of 30 feet must be held between all signs, and signs for anyone advertiser must be at least 200 feet apart. ( 4 ) Sign Locations: I I I I "a" Not closer than 40 feet to a street intersection or median opening. "b" Not closer than 3 feet from the edge of the sign to the street curb (or edge of pavement). Signs should not encroach either the sidewalks or street. "c" Not in a motorist "visibility triangle". Generally, if a sign is close to blocking motorist visibility, it should be moved (see "a" above). "d" Not more than 3 miles 'from the subject property. I I I I I I I (5) Signs should be rigid, 2 dimensional displays that advertise new residential property, "for sale" only (not lease property), guiding the motorist to a specific location. These are the guidelines under which this policy will be administered, relating particularly to the weekend/motoring/ home-buying customer. It is the responsibility of the builder to secure permission of the adjacent property owner for placement of the signs on private property. This policy does not grant unlimited access and use of the City right-of-way. Violations of this policy will be cause for confiscating the signs, and excessive violations may require that the policy simply be abandoned. All builders are offered the use of this policy equally. In so doing, we ask that you help us maintain a neat and orderly appearance throughout all of North Richland Hills. I I I I I I I I I I SECTION 6.3 SUBDIVISION/NEW DEVELOPMENT SIGNS. (a) These signs are used for identification of a new project, such as a subdivision, where real property is being sold for the first time to a user, new buildings', puboic projects and the like. These signs are not permanent 'but may be required for a longer period of time than most temporary signs. In no event shall there be more than one on-site sign which for a project located on property owned by the adver- tiser in the same zoning district and one off-site sign to be located in any zoning districts with exception of AG and all R districts. Such signs shall be removed at the end of one year or completion of the project, whichever comes first. An extension to the one year limitation may be granted by the Building Official and a renewal fee equal to the permit fee is paid and one of the following requirements are met: (1) a substantial portion of the development is not yet completed, (2) if the development has building activity in progress, (3) if the sign is relocated to a portion of the develop- ment which is not offensive to the completed portions of the development. These signs shall not exceed 15 feet in height and 150 square feet in area. They shall be located at least 25 feet behind the curb of any street, outside any visibility triangle. I I I I I I I I I (b) A sign permit is required for subdivision or new development signs erected or placed in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.3(a). SECTION 6.4 TRADE CONSTRUCTION SIGNS. Trade construction signs may be approved at the discretion of the Building Official to advertise the various construc- tion trades on any construction site. Trade construction signs shall be removed before a certificate of occupancy is issued. They shall be in accordance with Section 6.3. SECTION 6.5 POLITICAL SIGNS. Temporary, unlighted political signs (including portable or trailer signs) supporting an announced candidate, a party or an issue shall be allowed in any district without a sign permit, subject to the following: (a) Political signs -shall be located only on private property with the,permission of the owner. Political signs shall not be permitted on any public property or right-of-way, nor on any utility, light, traffic signal ~r sign poles. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (b) Political signs are permitted for a period of thirty (30) days prior to local or county elections, sixty (60) days prior to a state election, and ninety (90) days prior to a national election. All political signs shall be removed not later than seven (7) days after the election or after the termination of candidacy, whichever occurs first. (c) In AG and all R zoning districts, political signs shall not have a height of more than three (3) feet above grade. In other zoning districts, the height shall not exceed six (6) feet above grade. (d) In AG and all R zoning districts, political signs shall not exceed five (5) square feet in area. In other zoning districts, the area shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet. (e) In all zoning districts, political signs shall be located no closer than ten (10) feet to the street or curb and shall not be located to cause a safety or traffic hazard. SECTION 6.6 CIVIC AND RELIGIOUS SIGNS. (a) Temporary signs advertising the civic or religious events of civic and religious organizations may be erected or placed on their property after obtaining a permit from the Building Department at no cost. A maximum of two permits may be issued at anyone time. (b) Temporary signs advertising the civic or religious events of civic and religious organizations may be erected or placed on private property with the written permission of the owner and pay for a permit from the Building Department and are--subject to Section 6.1 (c) Signs announcing civic or religious events of wide- spread community interest may be erected on public property or right-of-way with special permission from the City Council if they do not create a traffic hazard and obtain a permit without cost from the Building Department. ARTICLE 7. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION The construction of all signs shall comply to structural requirements of the City of North Richland Hills Building Code, and also the current edition of the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City. The design shall be related to the type of supoorts and shall be in harmony with surroundings. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARTICLE 8. BILLBOARDS SECTION 8.1 APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL. (a) No billboard may be constructed unless a sign permit therefor has been issued with the approval of the City Council. (b) In making its determination, the City Council shall consider, among other factors, whether or not issuance of the permit. (1) Will be materially detrimental to the public welfare; (2) Will substantially interfere with the orderly develop- ment of the City as provided for in the Official Land Use Plan; (3) Will be compatible with the development of property of other persons located in the vicinity thereof; (4) Will comply with the provisions of this Ordinance. (c) Applications therefor shall be filed and processed as provided for in Article 3 of this Ordinance. SECTION 8.2 ZONING. A billboard may be placed only adjacent to a limited access freeway as defined in Section 2.5, in zoning districts except AG and all R districts. SECTION 8.3 MAXIMUM AREA. (a) No singlefaced' billbpard shall be larger than 700 square feet in area. (b) No one face of a double-faced or V-shaped billboard shall exceed 700 square feet in area. SECTION 8.4 MAXIMUM HEIGHT. The maximum geight of billboards shall be fifty (50) feet measured from the ground to the overall top. Approval for taller billboards may be granted by the City Council in those cases where it will reduce clutter and fit in more compatibly with the surrounding terrain and structures. No billboard shlall be located on the roof or wall of a1 building. SECTION 8.5 BILLBOARD LOCATION AND POSITION. (a) Billboards shall be erected only on private property ,and shall not project over any public property or right -of-way. Billboards shall be located within 100 feet of the limited access freeway boundary line. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (b) Billboards shall be positioned such that the primary viewing angle is from the freeway. SECTION 8.6 BILLBOARDS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. (a) The closest projecting point of a billboard shall not be located closer than 100 feet from a residential district boundary or property line. (b) The closest projecting point of a billboard shall not be located closer than 100 feet from the property line of any public recreation area, public or parochial school, public library or church. SECTION 8.7 STRUCTURE. (a) From the effective date of this Ordinance, all new billboards shall be of single post construction. (b) All billboards shall comply structurally to the' City's Building Code. SECTION 8.8 MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BILLBOARDS. A minimum distance of 1760 feet shall be maintained between any two(2)billboards located on the same side of the freeway. SECTION 8.9 ILLUMINATION. (a) Any illumination used on a billboard shall be of an indirect type and shall not face toward any residential building. (b) No flashing or intermittent lights shall be used to illuminate a billboard. ARTICLE 9. OBNOXIOUS SIGNS EXPLOITING SEX PROHIBITED SECTION 9.1 VISUAL DEPICTION OF SEXUAL AREAS OF HUMAN FORM PROHIBITED. No sign or signs as defined in this Ordinance, to include any temporary sign, which in whole or in part, depicts the human form in such a manner that the areas of the buttocks, or the genitals, or the pubic area, or any portion of the female breast below the top of the nipple, are depicted as not covered with opaque clothing shall be maintained, ere c t ed, 0 r pIa c e d U P 0 n', 0 r ad j ace n t tot h e 0 u t sid e 0 fan y building where it is visible from public streets or from adjacent buildings or premises. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION 9.2 USE OF WORDS CONNOTATING EROTIC ENTERTAINMENT PROHIBITED. No sign or signs as defined in this Ordinance, to include any temporary signs, which in whole or part advertise any "topless," "bottomless," "naked," or words of like import, except that the words "adult entertainment" or "adult shows" will be permissible, shall be maintained, erected, or placed upon or adjacent to the outside of any building where it is visible from public streets or from adjacent buildings or premises. SECTION 9.3 DISPLAY OF OFFENSIVE SIGNS A PUBLIC NUISANCE. Any sign which is in violation of Sections 9.1 and 9.2 is declared a public nuisance. SECTION 9.4 ABATEMENT. (a) Any temporary sign or signs in violation of this Article shall be abated within twenty-four (24) hours after notice has been given in writing to abate the sign or signs. Any sign which involves letters placed on a marquee is considered a temporary sign for purposes of this Article. (b) Any sign or signs in violation of this Article which can be covered or painted over in such a manner so the sign will comply with this Article and which do not require removal or mechanical or electrical alterations of the whole or part of the sign shall be covered or painted within seventy-two (72) hours after written notice has been given in writing to abate the sign or signs. (c) Signs in violation of this -Article which require mechanical or electrical a"lteration of all or part of the sign or require the removal of part or all of the sign in order to comply with this Article shall be altered or removed within seven (7) days after service of written notice to abate the sign or signs. SECTION 9.5 NOTICE TO ABATE. (a) The City Manager or the Building Official or one of their designee are authorized to prepare and deliver notice to abate any sign or signs in violation of this Article. (b) Notice is deemed served for the purpose of this Article if delivered to -any person who is an owner or lessee of the premises on which the sign or signs are located or to any officer of any corporation or any partner of a partnership which is operating a business on the premises on which the sign or signs are located which violates this Article and which is responsible for the sign or signs in violation of this Article. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION 9.6 VIOLATION A MISDENEANOR. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that any person, firm or corporation which shall violate any provision of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdeneanor, and on conviction may be punished by fine of not less than Fifty ($50.00) Dollars nor more than One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars, and each day such violation occurs shall be deemed a separate offense. ARTICLE 10. ENFORCEMENT SECTION 10.1 ENFORCEMENT. It shall be the duty of the Building Official to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance. The Chief of Police and all officers charged with the enforcement of the law shall assist the Building Official. SECTION 10.2 RIGHT OF ENTRY. Upon presentation of proper credentials, the Building Official or his duly authorized representative may enter at reasonable times, any buildings, structure or premises in the City to perform any duties imposed upon him by this Ordinance. SECTION 10.3 ABATEMENT OF NONCONFORMING SIGN. (a) A period of ten (10) years subsequent to January 24, 1983 is hereby established for the abatement of signs legally existing prior to said date but which signs become nonconforming as a result of regulations contained herein. This provision applies to signs otherwise established. Illegally erected signs are subject to immediate abatement. (b) Nonconforming painted wall signs are subject, in addition to the abatement procedures set forth, to immediate abatement when the business occupying the premises changes to a different business or different owner necessitating repainting of the signs. (c) Abatement periods established herein are subject to appeal before the City Council. ARTICLE 11. SECTION 11.1 SAVINGS CLAUSE. If any portion of this Ordinance is held to be invalid by any C~urt of competent jurisdiction it shall not affect the remaining valid portion. I" I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - OCTOBER 27, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order October 27, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Mack Garvin Virginia Moody Jim Ramsey Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Don Dietrich Lee Maness Richard Royston Don Bowen 2. ROLL CALL Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Secretary Attorney Assistant Public Works Director Finance Director Director of Planning Planning & Zoning Member Members of the Press Absent: Harold Newman Jeanette Rewis Gene Riddle John Whitney Richard Albin Councilman City Secretary Public Works Director Director of Support Services City Engineer 3. INVOCATION Councilman Ramsey gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 13, 1986 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the minutes of the meeting of October 13, 1986. Motion carried 5-0; Councilwoman Hinkle abstaining due to absence from the meeting. II II f II I I I I II ~ I I I I I I I ~ I October 27, 1986 Page 2 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) -FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Ramsey removed Items Number 10 and 13, and Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed Items Number 14 and 16. 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (9 & 15) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. 7. PZ 86-37 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF RICHLAND VILLAGE JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE TRACT 1G, JOHN CONDRA SURVEY, ABSTRACT 311, FROM R-7 MF (MULTI-FAMILY) TO C-l (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Ronald E. Reese, partner, North Richland Hills Joint Venture, appeared before the Council. Mr. Reese stated their initial plans were to develop this property as multi-family. Mr. Reese stated that it was presently not economically feasible to develop this property as 'multi-family. Mr. Reese stated they did a thorough market search as to what would be the best use of the property and that was why they were requesting C-1 zoning on the 2.43 acres that fronted Rufe Snow. Mr. Reese stated they ultimately plan to build a high quality retail development. Mr. Reese stated the only negative impact they could foresee with C-l zoning would be how it affected the homeowners to the north. Mr. Reese stated they contacted these homeowners and their major concerns were security and privacy. Mr. Reese stated they agreed to deed restrict the property, erect an eight foot high masonry wall on the north boundary line, there would be a 60 foot building set back requirement and a 40 foot landscape buffer. Mr. Reese stated he felt they had the homeowners support and respectfully asked the City Council to approve this zoning request. Mayor Echols called for anyone else wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I October 27, 1986 Page 3 There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 8. ORDINANCE NO. 1411 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1411. Councilman Fisher stated his concerns about including the stipulations the applicant and homeowners had worked out. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to amend the motion to state with the inclusion of the deed restrictions to be furnished by the applicant and to be a part of the ordinance. Motion carried 6-0. * 9. PS 85-78 REQUEST OF WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR FINAL PLAT OF STEEPLE RIDGE ESTATE (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SHADY GROVE ROAD WEST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD) APPROVED 10. PS 86-41 REQUEST OF C. RICHARD DAVIS AND JULIANA DAVIS FOR FINAL PLAT OF BLOCK 4, DIAMOND GLEN ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HARMONSON ROAD AND HONEY LANE) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked to be excused from this item because of conflict of interest. Mayor Echols excused Mayor Pro Tern Davis. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PS 86-41. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Pro Tem Davis returned to the Council table. 11. SO 86-14 REQUEST OF ALAN YOUNG BUICK FOR VARIANCE TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE TO ALLOW ADVERTISING BALLOON APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve SO 86-14. Motion carried 6-0. I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I October 27, 1986 Page 4 12. GN 86-108 POSSIBLE RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1409 - AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE APPROVED Councilman Ramsey stated that this ordinance was denied at the October 13, 1986 City Council Meeting. Councilman Ramsey stated that after discussing the proposed amendment with City Staff and Council Members, he felt it did have merit and would like to reconsider it. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to reconsider Ordinance No. 1409 at the November 10, 1986 City Council Meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 13. GN 86-116 CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL 1.5% COST-OF-LIVING INCREASE IN 86-87 OPERATING BUDGET TABLED Councilman Ramsey stated that the policy among the Council was that someone in the majority should resurrect an issue that had been voted upon by the Council. Councilman Ramsey stated that he was in the minority on the approval of the budget, and he did not feel comfortable being in the minority and bringing the issue back up. Councilman Ramsey stated he would prefer that if someone in the majority wanted to have this issue heard that they bring it back before the Council. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he understood Councilman Ramsey's concern and wanted to recommend that this item be tabled. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the Council wanted to be fair to the employees. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the Council had committed,to themselves that at mid-year they would look at how the revenues and collections were doing and consider giving any additional raises at that time. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to table GN 86-116. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Michael Rawson, 7328 Century Drive and an employee of the North Richland Hills Fire Department, appeared before the Council. Mr. Rawson stated he wanted to ask the City Council to also consider applying the 1.5% increase towards the Texas Municipal Retirement System contribution raising the City's contribution from ll:l to 2t:l. ~. I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I October 27, 1986 Page 5 14. GN 86-118 MOVE-IN EXPENSES AT PUBLIC WORKS CENTER APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve GN 86-118 with the exception that the funding source for the $68,500 to be taken from CIP Unspecified Funds be changed to other sources to be determined by the City Manager. Motion carried 6-0. *15. GN 86-119 AWARD OF BID FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROGRAM FOR LIBRARY AND RECREATION CENTER APPROVED 16. PW 86-28 APPROVAL OF THE EXTERIOR DESIGN OF 6 MILLION GALLON STANDPIPE WATER TANK ON AMUNDSON ROAD APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve PW 86-28, exterior design number 1. Motion carried 6-0. 17. CITIZEN PRESENTATION Mr. Don Schenck, 6836 Hadley Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Schenck stated he had four specific problems that he had not been able to obtain a satisfactory answer to. Mr. Schenck stated number one, there needed to be a street light at the intersection of Chapman Road and Megan Drive. Mr. Schenck stated the nearest street light was at the intersection of Wakefield and Chapman Road which was over 300 feet away. Mr. Schenck stated secondly, there was a resident that lived in the 7000 block of Chapman Road who was parking a semi-tractor trailer truck on the west bound side of Chapman Road. Mr. Schenck stated if someone was exiting from the Richfield Addition onto Chapman and wanted to go east, they must pullout into the traffic to see around this truck. Mr. Schenck stated this obstruction had already caused one accident. Mr. Schenck stated the homeowners would like for the City to erect no parking signs on the west bound side of Chapman Road from Richfield Park to Rufe Snow. Mayor Echols stated the Council would direct Mr. Line to look into these problems. Mr. Schenck stated thirdly, the four streets in the Richfield Addition were not through streets. Mr. Schenck stated there was one way in that circled around and came back to the original street. Mr. Schenck stated that because of the construction they were seeing an increase in I" I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I October 27, 1986 Page 6 traffic, cars as well as semi-trucks, trying to cut through Richfield Addition to reach Hightower. Mr. Schenck stated that Hadley and Mesa were dead-end streets and they would like to see a IINot a Through Street" or uNo Outlet" sign installed on Richfield and Megan. Mr. Schenck stated his fourth problem was at the end of Hadley and Mesa there was a guardrail. Mr. Schenck stated you had to be within 100 feet of the guardrail to see it. Mr. Schenck requested the guardrails on Mesa and Hadley be reflectorized or a stop sign be installed on them. Mayor Pro Davis asked that the Staff send written notification to Mr. Schenck and a copy to the Council regarding the handling of Mr. Schenck1s problems before the next City Council Meeting. 18. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 6-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary 1 ), CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Council Meeting Date:ll/10/86 Proposed Amendment to Section 10 of the Zoning OrdinancÄe d N b PZ 86-46 A Z...:t t gen a u mer: '-- to Permit Incent1ve Increases 1n öpart:ment: on.J..ng w tl - Planned Development Controls Ordinance No. 1409 I This proposed revision to Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance is in the area of the Multi-Family Planned Development District. The proposed revision would modify the maximum unit density allowed on a Planned Development Multi-Family Site. The intent of the Ordinance Revision would be to allow an incentive increase in the maximum density of units when the PD Site Plan is submitted and approved by the Commission and the City Council. The proposed revision would allow Planned Development Sites to increase density to a maximum of 20 units per acre. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the proposed revision to Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance. ~ ~ Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ef2ing BUdge4 _ ~ ~- Departme t H~~d Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡21/(jrl~ City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 III ." ~ -. Ii I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I October 13, 1986 Page 9 Motion carried 5-0. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to deny SO 86- 23. GN 86-101 SUPPORT FOR IFICATION OF ALL COACHES IN SPORTS PROGRAM, RESO ON NO. 86-39 POSTPONED seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to postpone November 10, 1986. 5-0. 24. GN 86-108 PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 10 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT INCENTIVE INCREASES IN APARTMENT ZONING WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS, ORDINANCE NO. 1409 DENIED Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. Mr. Line stated the proposed ordinance would modify the maximum unit density allowed on planned development multi-family sites. Mr. Line stated the intent of the ordinance would be to allow an incentive increase in the maximum density of units when the planned development site plan was submitted and approved by the Commission and the City Council. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition. ,~ Councilwoman Moody stated that a lot of thought went into the Zoning Ordinance in regard to the density on multi-family sites. Councilwoman Moody stated she felt the City would be compromising by increasing the density. Councilwoman Moody stated she was opposed to the ordinance. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he had worked with the Planning and Zoning Commission as a liaison when the Zoning Ordinance was written and he would be the first to defend it. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt the Council needed to look at the controls they would have with this ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the only difference in this ordinance and the original one was four units per acre. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that the control the Council would have would be such as the location of the buildings, landscaping, etc. Councilman Fisher stated he was in favor of planned development if there were a way to hold the developer to it. Councilman Fisher stated he was I: ~ . ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I October 13, 1986 Page 10 not in favor of 20 units per acre. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt the City had apartments under control at the present time. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt the ordinance did have a merit but he was not in favor of it. Councilwoman Moody stated that in response to Mayor Pro Tem Davis' statement some of the things sounded very attractive as to what the developer could be held to in planned development. The Council had been known to be flexible and fair minded. Councilwoman Moody stated that each case was looked at individually and she did not think the City had to go to a carte blanch on multi-family property. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the Council would not get the chance to see the individual case or see a particular project because a variance could not be granted until this section of the Zoning Ordinance was changed. Mayor Echols stated he felt the planned development was an option the City needed. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to deny Ordinance No. 1409. Motion carried 3-2; Councilwoman Moody and Councilmen Ramsey, and Fisher voting for and Mayor Pro Tem Davis and Councilman Garvin voting against. *25. GN 86-109 BANK WIRE TRANSFER CONTRACTS, RESOLUTION NOS. 86-44 AND 86-45 APPROVED 26. GN 86-110 PAVING ASSESSMENTS - DAVIS MEMORIA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Mayor Echols stated the City Staff and the Adminis ative Staff of the Church had attempted to resolve this problem. yor Echols· stated the Church was requesting the Council to waive interest on the assessment on the subject property. Dr. Dean Posey, representing Davis emorial United Methodist Church, appeared before the Council. Dr. Posey stated he felt at the City had not lost any money and requested the Counci 0 waive the interest. Councilwoman M ây moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to waive the interest. Mr. ntire advised the Council they could not waive the interest because would be like waiving taxes. I' let 1 I 1 I I 1 I I·-.J I I I I 1 I I . 1 I Page 11 P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( PZ 86-43 APPROVED PZ 86-44 APPROVED 9. PZ 86-46 PZ 86-46 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission ( Mr. Frank stated he maintains but it will be the homeowners association. Mr. Clark said Mr. Frank poor job maintaining Chairman Bowen told should call the c· y complaints. Clark that he he has any en closed the Public Ms. ash made the motion to approve 86-43 with the understanding that the lot size and square footage of the house be put on the plat. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-44 with the stipulation to continue the requirements related to the golf course as contained in the previous cases. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-45. This motion was seconded by ':Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried :5-0. Consideration of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding the R-7-MF District. Chairman Bowen stated this amendment would change the Planned Development to allow a maximum of 20 units. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-46. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission I- ' 1-. I 1 1 I 1 I I Ir) 1 I I I I I I I- I ORDINANCE NO. 1409 BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that Ordinance No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance), adopted January 9, 1984 and as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended at the following section: R-7 MF DISTRICT Revise the following sections: Section 10.4.13 Maximum density may not exceed twenty (20) units per acre, except as may be granted when combined with an approved PD Site Plan. Section 10.6 (d) Maximum density may not exceed twenty (20) units per acre gross density under any circumstances. APPROVED BY THE Pl.ANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. A /J~ / ~.. r~~. ¡e Cnairman Planning & Zoning Commission ~~~ Secret - y Planni~ & 'Z~iSSion PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1986. Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 11/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Hamm and Sandlin to Rezone Lot 1, Agenda Number: PZ 86-47 Block 30, Holiday North Addition trom l{-f Mlt· to C-L. Ordinance No. 1413 This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant multi-family tract located on the west side of Davis Boulevard south of the TESCO Power Line easement. The requested rezoning is from R-7 MF Multi-Family to C-2 Commercial. The applicant's stated purpose in requesting the rezoning is to transfer the property from a multi-family to a commercial use and to provide the maximum number of available use types for the proposed development. In reviewing the request the Staff made several comments for the Commission's consideration. 1) The subject tract is surrounded by residential and multi-family zoned properties with the exception of the eastern property line where there is an existing C-1 Commercial area across an abandoned street from the subject tract. No other C-2 zoning exists in the area of the request. 2) The noted abandoned street along the eastern boundary of the subject property has been vacated officially by the City of North Richland Hills. The removal of that street leaves the subject tract with a total street frontage facing Davis Boulevard of less than 200 feet for a 7.34 acre Tract. 3) Along the north line of the subject tract the TESCO right of way effectively isolates the tract from the adjacent residential area. However, Steeplewood Drive was left with a dead-end which could be extended into the subject tract. In the event that the street were proposed to be extended an outlet would be provided which would direct commercial traffic into a residential neighborhood. 4) The applicant did not submit any information with his application which would indicate the nature and extent of any, proposed uses for the subject tract. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-47 requesting rezoning on Lot 1, Block 30, Holiday North Addition from R-7 MF to C-2 with the stipulation that the applicant provide .a list of the suggested uses from the C-2 District at the time the hearing is held before the City Council. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available " . Finance Director p t! l~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 ~ , I Ie I I I I I I I P I I I -I I II Ie I I .. ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, OCTOBER 9, 1986 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1986 1. PS 86-41 PS 86-41 APPROVED 2. PS 86-43 ,-APPROVED 3. PZ 86-47 PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members The meeting was called to order by Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M. Alt. Member P & Z Coordinator Don Bowe John winger Mar Wood J e Hallford Carole Flippo Wanda Calvert ABSENT: Marjorie Nash George Tucker Chairma owen stated the minutes would ave to be postponed since there was ot enough present to approve the nutes. Request of C. Richard Davis, Jr. & Juliana Davis for final plat of Block 4, Diamond Glen Addition. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 86-41. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Richmond Bay Development for preliminary plat of Lots 42-45, Block 3, and Blocks 10, 11, & 12, Meadow Lakes Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 86-43. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Hamm & Sandlin to rezone Lot 1, Block. 30, Holiday North Addition, Section 8, from its present classification of R-7-MF Multi-Family to C-2 Commercial. This property is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard, south of the TESCO right of way. I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I <IIi , Page 2 ~ P & Z Minutes October 9, 1986 ( Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward. Ron McGough, 5133 Davis Boulevard, came forward to represent Hamm & Sandlin. Mr. Wood asked what they plan to do with the property. Mr. McGough stated the C-2 Commercial gives them a wider range. He stated they had thought of Commercial Warehouse with retail frontage, a retail showroom. Ms. Flippo asked if they would get right of way across the TESCO easement to extend Steeplewood Drive. Mr. McGough said they would prefer not to, but the City Staff had requested it. He stated there is a drainage problem there and they could only use if for parking. Mr. Schwinger asked about the triangular piece of property along Davis Boulevard. Mr. McGough stated they could not purchase that property. He said someone is in the process of refurbishing the store. Mr. McGough said they could not pay the price they were asking for the property. Mr. Schwinger asked how much road frontage they have. Mr. McGough stated they only have about 200 feet. He said if they do anything with the property, they would have to build along the TESCO right of way. Mr. Schwinger asked who owned the abandoned street. , " I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I 'I I Ie I I Page 3 ~ P & Z Minutes October 9, 1986 ( Mr. McGough stated that 25 feet belongs to each property owner. Chairman Bowen stated he has concerns about Commercial surrounded by residential. He stated there is R-2 to the north, R-5-D to the west, and R-7-MF to the south. Mr. McGough stated there is a 75 foot TESCO easement for a buffer. He said the ordinance requires a buffer and a fence. Mr. McGough stated they had a contract on the property for Multi Family but they could not get financing. Mr. Schwinger asked if they would consider a conditional motion since they do not have a plan for the use of the property. Mr. McGough stated he did not feel it would cause a problem. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Emanuel Tricoli, 5706 Crestwood Circle, came forward. He said he was in opposition to any warehousing on this property because if would devalue his property, but said he is not Opposed to all commercial. Chairman Bowen stated you could not put mini warehouses in C-2 zoning, only office warehouses. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. PZ 86-47 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-47 with the condition that a proposed list of uses in the Zoning Ordinance be submitted prior to going to the City Council. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-1 with Chairman Bowen voting against. I. Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I ( \ (- KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 19, 1986 ) Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-47 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-7-MF TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 105 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as reqtlired for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ad (jJ. ~ ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-47 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I 'I I Ie I I 5133 DAVIS BOULEVARD TO: FROM: RE: Dear Council Members: d-/-amm 5- ¿andfÚ2 INVESTORS AC 817 /281-5026 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 OCTOBER 20, 1986 CITY COUNCIL NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RON MCGOUGH ZONING CASE PZ 86-47 Per request of zoning commission on Thursday October 9, 1986 Hamm & Sandlin submit the following information. We intend to stay within C-2 zoning uses for this tract. Our primary plans at this time call for office/showroom type buildings with warehouse and possibly some retail space. This tract will be developed on an "as needed" basis. f1.C.E,TJ/iP"v5>' /l!éWS/A/¿<. P~/NThV) S~cjO A/¿'W Ht/?P /7~'-k.. ì:JEI4LE~$. P.4-wN 5"hops ° If? AI!..;AI é E f;... ; pTm£,."'o 5AæyI J<!¿:fA "; f/EAII! "¡,,,c¡';Ñ(f7' SALE!. 4 oJ T f? / fA? ¡J '- k. I r,¿Þ4~ (f.~ Kfrv1à L A~ -' /1-3-ib Regards, It 1/l2)Je<{- Ron McGough General Manager RMcG/sms P.S. October 29, 1986, This site was submitted to the United States Postal Service for the new North Richland Hills Postal Facility. I , Ie II I I I I I I Ie I I I I (I (1 I I" I ORDINANCE NO. 1413 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-47 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-MF to C-2. BEING Lot 1, Block 30, Holiday North Addition, Section 8, an addition to the City of North Rich1and Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-143, Page 25, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard, south of the TESCO right of way. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND 1986. c:::::::::::1!l2~~HA PLANNING AND s~ PLANNI~1;'~~ON BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-47 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1986. MAYOR CITY. OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 11/10 ubject: Council Meeting Date: Request of North Richland Hills Joint Venture to Rezon~ PZ 86-48 a Portion ot Tract lAZ, John t.;. Yates Survey, genda Number: Abstract 1753 from R-7 MF to 1-2 Ordinance No. 1414 This Zoning Application is presented on the existing Industrial and Multi-Family zoned tract located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive and north side of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad. The requested rezoning is from R-7 MF Multi-Family and 1-2 Industrial to 1-2 Industrial and a small tract of Industrial property from 1-2 to R-7 MF. The purpose for the proposed rezoning is to enlarge the size of the 1-2 zoned tract along the Railroad to accommodate a proposed commercial/industrial center. The small tract requested to be rezoned to R-7 MF is intended to realign the zoning boundaries to correspond with the lot layout submitted with the rezoning request. In reviewing the proposed rezoning the Staff had several comments for Commission consideration. 1) The net result of the proposed rezonings is to enlarge the area zoned for industrial use and reduce the area of multi-family use. 2) Although the existing zoning along Rufe Snow Drive is 1-2 Industrial, the applicant indicates in his layout that the frontage property along the street is to be used for commercial development. This is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. 3) The Thoroughfare Plan designates Rufe Snow Drive as an Arterial Street requiring a total right of way of 110 feet. If the full extent of the right of way has not been provided the applicants will be required to provide the necessary dedication of additional right of way. In addition, the applicants are proposing to construct a street within their property which will have a major intersection with Rufe Snow Drive. The Staff has already discussed the possibility with the applicant of their providing a traffic signal at this location. 4) The interior layout of the subject tract indicates that the proposed street will turn north and intersect with Watauga Road. The location of the proposed street with its intersection with Watauga Road will have to be coordinated with the City's Watauga Road project to provide the necessary median cut. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-48 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 1A2, John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753 from R-7MF and 1-2 to 1-2 and R-7 MF. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Oper ing Budget o er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Rljll/~ City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 , Þ. \, ~ I C-2 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I Page 4 4IÞ p & Z Minutes October 9, 1986 4. PZ 86-48 PZ 86-48 APPROVED 5. PZ 86-49 e Request of North Richland Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract lA2, John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753, from its present classification of R-7-MF Multi-Family to I-2 Industrial and a small area of 0.15 acres rezoned from 1-2 Industrial to R-7-MF Multi-Family. This property is located east of Rufe Snow Drive just north of the St. Louis & Southwestern Railroad. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. -- - ,/ John Mowrey with North Richland Hills Joint Venture came forward. He stated this property has two easements running through it: Lone Star Gas Company easement and Magnolia Pipeline Company easement. Mr. Mowrey stated that with the existing zoning lines they are requesting to change 8 acres of Multi-Family to Industrial and a small area of Industrial to Multi-Family. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-48. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Mickey L. Hawkins, Roy Ratliff, Connie G. Gurich, Wills, & Elizabeth S erger to rezone Lots 8 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, & 17, 1, Thompson Park Estates, Tract 4A2A, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their present classification of R-l Single Family to C-l Commercial. This property is located on the south side of Martin Drive, west of Precinct Line Road. I Ie I I 'I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 22, 1986 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-48 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-7-MF AND 1-2 TO 1-2 AND R-7-MF REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 94 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for. updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RUA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works t1r. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Uorks Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-48 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1414 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-48 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-MF to 1-2 and from 1-2 to R-7-MF. FOR 1-2 BEING a 29.415 acre tract of land situated in the John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753, Tarrant County, Texas, said 29.415 acre tract being a portion of a tract of land conveyed to North Richland Hills Joint Venture as recorded in Volume 3114, Page 1203, of the County records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a 5/8 inch iron pin with cap stamped "Carter & Burgess", set, where the Easterly Right-of-Way line of Rufe Snow Drive as recorded in Volume 7284, Page 684, said county records. Intersects the Northerly R.O.W. line of St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad. THENCE North 03 degrees 14 minutes 01 seconds East along the Easterly R.O.W. line of said Rufe Snow Drive, 1,043.84 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin with cap stamped "Carter & Burgess", set. THENCE South 86 degrees 45 minutes 59 seconds East leaving the Easterly R.O.W. line of said Rufe Snow Drive at 15.00 feet passing the Southwest corner of a tract of land being Lot 1, Block A, Northland Shopping Center Addition, as recorded in Plat Volume 388-131, Page 82, said county records. Continuing along the Southerly line of said Northland tract, in all 445.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin found; THENCE North 64 degrees 48 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 1022.97 feet to a iron pin; thence South 30 degrees 27 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 703.85 feet to a iron 'pin; thence 64 degrees 48 minutes 53 seconds West along the Northerly R.O.W. line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad 622.41 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin. THENCE South 64 degrees 48 minutes 53 seconds West along the Northerly R.O.W. line of said St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad 1,139.18 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin with cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" set being the beginning of a curve to the left. I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 THENCE 214.32 feet along the Northerly R.O.W. line of said St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad and along the arc of said curve to the left, whose central angle is 02 degrees 53 minutes 16 seconds, whose radius is 4,252.08 feet and whose long chord bears South 63 degrees 22 minutes 15 seconds West, 214.29 feet to the point of beginning and containing 29.415 gross acres of which 2.585 acres lie within planned road leasving 26.83 net acres, more or less. FOR R-7-MF BEING a 0.15 acre tract of land situated in the John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753, Tarrant County, Texas, said 0.15 acre tract being a portion of a 70.04 acre tract of land conveyed to North Richland Hills Joint Venture as recorded in Volume 8114, Page 1203 of the county records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMENCING at a 5/8 inch iron pin with cap stamped "Carter & Burgess", set where the Easterly R.O.W. line of Rufe Snow Drive as recorded in Volume 7284, Page 684, said county records, intersects with the Northerly R.O.W. line of St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad; THENCE North 03 degrees 14 minutes 01 seconds East along the Easterly R.O.W. line of Rufe Snow Drive, 1,043.84 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin with cap stamped "Carter & Burgess", set; THENCE South 86 degrees 45 minutes 59 seconds East, leaving said Easterly R.O.W. of Rufe Snow Drive, 445.00 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin found to the true point of beginning; THENCE North 03 degrees 14 minutes 01 seconds East along the West line of said 70.04 acre tract, 80.14 feet.. to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 59 minutes 11 seconds East, leaving said West line of 70.04 acre tract, 165.53 feet to a point; THENCE South 64 degrees 48 minutes 53 seconds West, 187.92 feet back to the true point of beginning and containing 0.15 acres of land, more or less. I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I Page 3 This property is located east of Rufe Snow Drive, just north of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. C I' .~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-48 IS HEREBY REZONED AND THIS DAY OF , 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: _Ubject: Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) A Operating Budget _ ~ ~- - ;~, _'/¿;:; J) Departme ~~ad ~nature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM e 11/10/86 - Council Meeting Date: Request of Birdville I.S.D. for Rezoning Tract 4A, 4A1, PZ 86-50 4A'L, 4AIA, 4All:S, and 4Alt;, John t;ondra Survey, Ägenda Number: Abstract 311 from AG to U. Ordinance NO.1415 This Zoning Application is presented by the Birdville Independent School District on the tract at the southeast corner of Douglas Lane and Starnes Road. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to U Institutional. The School District has purchased this tract in order to construct two new schools on the site, an elementary and a Junior High or Middle School. The subject tract is approximately 34 acres in size. In the preliminary discussions with the School District representatives the Staff had identified several items which will be required to be considered in the development of the school sites. 1) The location of the site involves the development of several streets shown on the Thoroughfare Plan. A) Holiday Lane is required to be a four lane Collector Street which will provide the street frontage for the eastern side of the subject tract. The right of way dedication for the street has been a part of the negotiation process between the School District and the adjoining property owner to the east. As a result of those negotiations the right of way for the extension of Holiday Lane has been secured. The participation of the two property owners in the construction of the street will be required as a condition of development. B) Starnes Road along the north boundary of the school site is in the process of being improved as a part of the Street Bond Program currently under way. The applicants will be required to provide the necessary additional right of way to support the two lane Collector Street designation of Starnes Road and to participate in the improvement costs adjacent to their site. C) Douglas Lane forms the western boundary of the school site. The Thoroughfare Plan requires Douglas to be a two lane Secondary Collector Street. This street will also require additional right of way dedication from the school site and the participation of the applicant in the construction costs to improve the street. 2) The proposed site is not currently served with sewer utilities. The development of this tract will require the extension of a sewer main along the route of the existing drainage to serve this property. The current location of the sewer system which will have to be extended is at the north side of Hightower Drive. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available KZ\/~ City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of -L_ I I I I I I 3) The Drainage Master Plan for this area shows an open drainage channel located along the route of the natural drainage which effectively bisects the subject property. This drainage improvement will be necessary in order to remove the subject tract from the flood plain area. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-50 requesting rezoning on Tracts 4A, 4Al, 4A2, 4AIA, 4AIB, and 4AIC, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311 from AG to U. I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Page 2 of 2 I ... )1 ... ,..' I I II ."""""", -T - - I "" .& . f·" -----=_. r-~ --"':;l- I I R-3- I~OO I -:-'\ - 31 I II ~-1 I 139 "" ~". --- : .. - ....~ ~...~ I: 1152 J -- ~ ,- -.. .. ' ~ ì--- .....--. - '-J ·"1~ 0' j ¡ j , I - 1 ì ¡I'!Ii "" \ llllJ ...J '1' " :.. ~~ ¡ þ- ~ ~¡-; ì ¡ I ; : \ j ..... '.. j -- ~ ¡ . ~~ :: - -::j~! - 1---- t- /ì ì! ! w =- '~~'-."...'! I!I I~_ - """- '·SO- I-~:~:~--- - " ." .4; . '-¡-. .I J; ..~--+---':, ~: .õ ---¡-,.:" Ie: -~: .~'--- ¡...- -: -/Y;r E AG - --.:-~~ ~ A --~~__ -i :r ._~ ~ I"¡-- ..i.- ......:.;:, .; =--:. --:... '':'~ = ~j;J-- ~-- -~ª '- "'.-- -- = ==- ~. I L _.0:- ':. -~ '<;--1 ;- -s ~ - ~"~~:j 1-- I - I ... c iJiII"" ,,.'" AG ·j~3 I.-~- ._ .~ ì ;L ,,,,_oR,: I~~ AG __ ,..l ...... ~",,-::"_..' f""'\ ..... I! n:", D'5lZj = 3'2. Ioc -----; I l ¡ I - - J "!' n 'J ¡VI .~ '~ t.::: .-:;;" ':t II R-21 r t tl25 100...- ¡.- -- -- - -" - ---- _. to - --c - 1~~-1 ',-;; w --I-R..~-- .... -~-:--"-I AG I -' Et I " ht' I f . .~. · t... ~ t'tê I j~ -R-1 w '1 - - . I :; ... : AG -} , ~ ......~:-~ :.. ~ :::= ::..- - ....l _1-- r - =--:.... -1' t::':c: t 1::- ~. 3~ -.... ::: . 'C'_«: _ ~ \!~ I ' ... - 1 R-I : 1322 _____ :1 i Ir .. 1 ,;;::] - - -- - - - - - I--...,~ _ _ I: . .....I!;:. .,~:. - I ;---'!' ... .. -- ... i= _ ~ - ~ ;:: -- - ....;:-~ " ::: ::r~'~ '_ ~~ - - R-I ! ~ -- .... .-. ;:- ~: - ...------:. --,+--- ~ O~- - - \'\. . .. ~.. - - ,..JJO!. iN ~_ - \ \) I - ~ r-- ~;:' -..IÓ- :..:.."t. 1~ --f :R-2 AG "-~ -- 1351 I "<' ì-- I .!~ >-- r~ ':"111 I '~ -~-F=þ.IIT¡li I -;>H"""~r-l ] 'I I .r R-3 ',~~ -~. ¡ /' ~ ¡iJg; C-I L..-.. 1 C - 2 ~-:- J 1 - 2 !! ,,,,'" J I II ! C-I I I~I, I~ .- R-2 1175 I - .S ~ ·,AG -- [ ....r I: R-2. 1227 ....'" ¡:,,¡ T ì ¡ !! !, í I ~3 AG - ~. c-¡ --.. AG - ~ ~ R-7-MF I J - 1 t ti ¡ ¡ ! .... ] ~4Ë t I I ~4ê !t :P --- II' . I--- . ,_ I "I ¡ -4 . R- 2 - -j~ ¡ Ë L..~- d_ = '-- - f""7"'t:r ~~ ~-,,~- - I I-- ~ _ :... ="2.. I : -' ..L- r--- !~Ir--- R'3 -,~ -I R-2. ~!-- í - ::¡~ ., =CJ AG tJ I p; ~_I ...--:" .1-..:::r--t' c-r I / I <, ,1; _ ~ ~ r \R:ì _ ~ 1,~_ ,_ ~ 1800;.,'='· ~~::; AG .--1 fl'" R - 3 ¡S' ( - ~ir: - ¡ ! AG j ;;: '" 1 - ¡ C)-I 0 I ! =:-~ --4 ---! -- ::J ~. - .~~- oft ¡~( .!' 12 '3 . I '\.Mi'h-. 'i¡" Ii AU ¡ U ~~ I@ ~; rül, .' ..)- I Un I ...... . .. (; I Ie I Page 7 P & Z Minutes October 9, 1986 6. PZ 86-50 I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PZ 86-50 APPROVED ( ( Request of Birdville I.S.D. to rezone Tracts 4A, 4A1, 4A2, 4AIA, 4AIB, & 4A1C, J. Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to U School. This property is located at the southeast corner of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. .¿-~, Billy Cypert, an employee of B.l.S.D. for building and grounds, came forward. He stated they wish to build two schools here. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Billy Robertson, 7401 Spring Lea Way, came forward. He stated he was not speaking against the request but he need some information. He wanted to know if the roads would be improved. He asked if Starnes would be a through street. Chairman Bowen stated that the ·~Thoroughfare Plan shows Starnes to be a through street. He said that Holiday Lane would go along the east side of the school property. Mr. Robertson asked 1f there would be improvements to Starnes and Douglas and would they have sidewalks. Chairman Bowen stated they would be required to make improvements to the streets. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PZ 86-50. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I \, ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 29, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-50 REVIEW LETTER, ZON I NG FROt1 AG TO U REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 59 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. !2ùtvaJW~':: RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoni ng Revi ew PZ 86-50 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1415 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-50 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to U. BEGINNING at a point lying in the West R.O.W. of Holiday Lane, said point being North 88 degrees 07 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 9.78 feet from the Southeast corner of a 19.74 acre tract filed for record in Volume 5104, Page 190, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 88 degrees 07 minutes 48 seconds West, 1318.62 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 50 minutes 39 seconds East, 34.93 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 88 degrees 08 minutes 09 seconds East, 21.57 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 18 minutes 06 seconds East, 600.20 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds West, 15.88 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 46 seconds West, 645.31 feet to a point for corner; THENCE East 1137.85 feet to a point for corner at the centerline of proposed Holiday Lane; THENCE South 00 degrees 02 minutes 15 seconds West along the centerline of proposed Holiday Lane, 843.48 feet to the P.C. of a curve to the left. THENCE along a curve to the left with a central angle of 36 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds; a radius of 297.34 feet, a distance of 190.28 feet to the PT of the curve to the left; THENCE South 36 degrees 37 minutes 45 seconds East, 72.60 feet to the PC of a curve to the right with a central angle of 09 degrees 29 minutes 26 seconds; a radius of 584.0 feet a distance of 96.73 feet to the PT of the curve to the right; l- Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I II I I I I Ie I Page 2 THENCE South 62 degrees 51 minutes 41 seconds West, 34.00 feet to a point in the West R.O.W. of Holiday Lane; THENCE along the West R.O.W. of Holiday Lane, a curve to the right having a radius of 550.00 feet whose Long Chord bears South 19 degrees 03 minutes 41 seconds East, a distance of 154.56 feet to the point of beginning and containing 1,509,528.38 square feet or 34.654 acres of land more or less. This property is located at the southeast corner of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. ~æ~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION , ~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-50 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1986. ............... MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY .r CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: ubject: - Council Meeting Date: Proposed Revision to Section XXII of the Zoning Ordinance PZ 86-51 Kegardlng t'arKlng Kequlremencs for ElemenLary élud Juuld}genda Number: High Schools - Ordinance No. 1416 11/10/86 I I ~ I This proposed reV1S10n to the Zoning Ordinance covers the criteria for parking requirements for Elementary and Junior High Schools. In the current Ordinance the requirement for parking for these uses is set at one space per each 100 square feet of classroom space. In discussions with the Birdville Independent School District personnel and reviewing the other criteria in the Ordinance it was discovered that the parking criteria for Elementary and Junior High Schools is greater than the requirement for High Schools. This situation seemed to be inverse to the actual use levels at the existing schools in the district. The Staff also asked the architect for the schools to provide any data he might have from other cities which might prove useful in determining whether the North Richland Hills criteria was comparable to the criteria used by other cities. The information supplied by the architect indicated that North Richland Hills requirements are at least twice as great as those utilized in five other suburban cities in the Metroplex. The Commission directed the Staff to draft a proposed reV1S10n to the table in Section XXII which would reduce the required number of parking spaces for an Elementary and Junior High School to a ratio of one space per 200 square feet of classroom space. This would halve the required number of spaces for these uses while at the same time leaving the requirement higher than the other cities surveyed by the architect. Although this ~roposed change would not produce the same number of spaces proposed by the School ~uistrict on its Site Layout on Starnes Road at Holiday Lane, the difference can be easily provided on the proposed site plan. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the proposed reV1Slon to Section XXII of the Zoning Ordinance decreasing the parking requirements for Elementary and Junior High Schools. I , , Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operafng Budget Ot r Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I ((1/1/~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of --1_ ..... . . . I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I {' I Page 8 P &. Z Minutes October 9, 1986 7. PZ 86-51 PZ 86-51 APPROVED 8. PZ 86-52 PZ 86-52 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT ( ( Amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080, Section XXII regarding parking spaces for elementary schools. Chairman Bowen stated the Parking Ordinance is a little strenuous. He said they could cut it in half and would be more in line with the other cities. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-51. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080, Section XXIV, regarding screening fences. Chairman Bowen stated this gives the City Staff som iscretion when there is a multi- ory that abuts a multi-story multi amily to amend the fence requir ent. Mr. r made the motion to approve 86-52. This motion was seco d by Ms. Flippo and the motion ied 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:10 P. M. Chairman Planning &. Zoning Commission etary Planning &. Zoning Commission I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1416 BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Richland Hills. Texas. that Ordinance No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance). adopted January 9. 1984 and as heretofore amended. be and the same is hereby amended at the following section: TABLE 22.3 Revise the following sections: Section (2) (b) School - Elementary and Junior High School 1 parking space per each 200 square feet of Classroom space. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF OCTOBER. 1986. Ch ¡æ2s-:t:æ~~ ission PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1986. ATTEST: Mayor Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney " i-, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: .Ubject: 11/10/86 - Council Meeting Date: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Revision, Section XXIV, Regarding Screening Fences for H1gh-R1se tlu1id1ngs Ordinance No. 1417 Agenda Number: PZ 86-52 This proposed reV1S10n to the Zoning Ordinance is in the area of the required screening fence between commercial properties and multi-family properties. The Commission heard a presentation from a representative of the Nowlin Center, currently under construction. The proposal was made that the Commission and the City Council consider setting some qualifying criteria under which the screening fence requirements could be waived on a high-rise commercial project adjacent to a multi-family site, especially in the light of the fact that a minimum six foot fence could not provide any sight-barring capability when the commercial center was a multi-story structure and the multi-family development was also a multi-story project. The Commission authorized the Staff to draft a proposed reV1S10n to the Zoning Ordinance which would allow some administrative latitude in determining whether the screening fence is viable and requiring the developer to submit a specific site plan which would detail what other efforts he would make to provide some visual and/or physical barrier between the properties. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the proposed revision to Section XXIV of the Zoning Ordinance allowing certain high-rise projects to delete the screening fence adjacent to multi-family projects. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director PaQe 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I- I Page 8 p & Z Minutes October 9, 1986 7. PZ 86-51 8. PZ 86-52 PZ 86-52 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT { ( Amendment to Zoning Orde ce #1080, Section XXII regar e parking spaces ools. Chae an Bowen stated the Parking dinance is a little strenuous. He said they could cut it in half and would be more in line with the other cities. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-51. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080, Section XXIV, regarding screening fences. Chairman Bowen stated this amendment gives the City Staff some discretion when there is a multi-story that abuts a multi-story multi-family to amend the fence requirement. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-52. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:10 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1417 BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that Ordinance No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance), adopted January 9, 1984 and as heretofore amended, be and the"same is hereby amended at the following section: Revise the following sections: Section 24.13.3 Screening Fince Required: A permanent screening fence of masonry and/or stockade type wood not less than six (6) feet in height, or permanent screening designed by an architect or landscape architect shall be erected prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on all property zoned R-7-MF, 0, LR, C-I, C-2, OC, I-I, 1-2, or U which abuts on property zoned R-I, R-2, R-3, R-4-SD, or R-S-D. On property zoned 0, LR, C-I, C-2, OC, I-I, or 1-2 which abuts property zoned R-6-T, R-7-MF, or U, a screening fence shall be erected along the entire length of the common line between such properties or within the property required to erect the screening. However, if the said property requiring the screening is proposed to be developed as a high-rise (3 stories or more) structure and the adjacent property is zoned R-7-MF and has an apartment project with buildings of 2 or more stories, then the screening fence requirement between the two uses may be waived by the Enforcing Officer. Such waiver must be requested by the commercial developer and must be accompanied by the submittal of a Site Plan giving the site layout of the proposed buildings including distance between the existing and proposed buildings, the proposed landscaping indicating the specific treatment of the area adjacent to the multi-family use and any other pertinent data related to the site development. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. ~(4?~ Secret y Planni6g 'Zo ng ission I· Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney , 1986. Mayor at CITY OF NORTH RICH LA NO HILLS Planning and Development Department: eUbject: Request of Jack Knowles for Short Form Plat of Lot 1, tllock 13, Fa1r Oaks Add1c1on - Council Meeting Date: 11/10/86 PS 86-36 Agenda Number: This Short Form Plat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 1, Block 13, Fair Oaks Addition. The property is located on the southeast corner of Bursey Road at Smithfield Road. The purpose for the proposed plat is to identify the existing property by lot and block definition. The applicant is in the process of renovating and enlarging his existing residence and the filing of the plat was a condition of issuance of the permit for construction. In the Engineer's comments the applicant was required to show on the plat the existing street right of way for Bursey Road on the north and west boundary of the proposed lot. In discussions with the applicant's engineer at the Commission hearing it was determined that the existing right of way on the north property line is sufficient. The applicant's property will be required to provide an additional approximately two feet along the west boundary of the tract in order to reach the required 50 foot minimum right of way. The Engineer also noted that the improvements to the noted street have not been made and that the applicants should participate in the costs of these streets. This participation could be in the form of an agreement of voluntary assessment for the future construction. RECOMMENDATION: ~he Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Short Form Plat Application PS 86-36 on Lot 1, Block 13, Fair Oaks Addition with the stipulation that the plat be revised to add the needed right of way along the west property line to conform to the 50 foot minimum requirement. I Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡e11,<>~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . FInance Director Page 1 of 1 I , Ie I I R-2 ~Cò R-2 I ~ c I - -- 1- - -- ....... ---...-- . .. - - """" - - - - I ~. ¡- - - - - - - - ..J' . - - - - - -..I' ~~ - _. - - - '. ~.~ ---- --------- .' - ~;..~ ·.t -I .þ~ i : I r J;'''~y ~- ~,...... I I rG I I AGe I I - (tÆ ,> · - --$- ~ ~.,(....- .. " (- .. ._0' , ... , J .,1-' . --., - AG "- .... ~ ~~ R-2 ;222 . '" ;&.,...~. .=...,...-- ¡ ~. -_J I : -'''~'.'':' ~!..'~f:" R-2 :2C2 .- c- J SU AG - ~ ------- I :J ~ ¡ I I i I ! ! ~ j '-- 0- "----..r- --.:.-. R-I 1322 -----: - --- -- .. ~ !-- ~' . ¡ "" ~.~~ R-3 , . '( ;. . '.: L. R-2 .227 C-~ ~_:j 1"~":Or.=~~l :: . . r-'~r--l-i.. I._ " .t'''''''''- -- = ~ - -. f!r-- "~." ,'--" -J _ - - i----..-.J...----. -.~ >- -r-- =~:~ ~ ~~.,./¿: . ~~~~, . - ~ R-~~'~~ ~:J, :. .'^ t~;~~~·~¡~~~··~- R-2 L-~.__ ...... -+=-'-~ " -: - :351 þ'~- ~- ~~:. ~ -( f . '~..(. :j . - ~~ ---'- :=.¡=.: ------ ~~- -:o~:':'. ':,.,~ -{J::;!::~ 2::: ,;..n',';c·· , '. . '" :;rj-. ~ --- - ___ __ . ,-~ !---~ -=:.. -,-:- ~-,;~~- ~..- '- I ,. ...r- -J -- I' ~:;, R :-~:~ :'~ I r ~ l- .'1i. . ~ . ~ t-J : ,- J .' ,L1 ¡S~7·i~~+-~ AG - _._.~_..J I I , !~~t-I'S' U * ': \ . ., H)// -~~\\~ ; : . I . : I f\ ~,~ / ~/~. . ~~ f ~. ~. . ~ ", ~.\;-':),~ -=:1---/>-<: :-i\ >ft? ' .--~+--...... r- ~. !' ; · - !-- '~¡-----f,,,. r ./ ....... 't-- ~t--,·..-t . , .. . -=-- :~ -:i~t-~:¡i¡ R-2 "7~ AG C-I I ~ . c-, R-7-MF \~ ¡~!!-;~ --- ~ß~t:""r~' I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS OCTOBER 23, 1986 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members Don Bowen John Schwinger Mark Wood Joe Hallford George Tucker Richard Royston Wanda Calvert Alt. Member Dir. Planning/Dev. P & Z Coordinator ABSENT: Marjorie Nash Carole Flippo CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9, 1986 Mr. Wood made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0 with Mr. Tucker abstaining since he was not present at the meeting. 1. PS 86-36 Request of Jack Knowles for Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 13, Fair Oaks Addition. Mr. Wood asked about the addition right of way needed on the west side of the property. Jackie Fluitt with Stembridge & Associates came forward to represent Mr. Knowles. He said he had a survey made to find out the amount of right of way needed and it showed approximately one and one half feet to make the 50 foot right of way. Mr. Fluitt said Mr. Knowles would give the additional right of way and it would be put on the plat before going to the City Council. PS 86-36 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 86-36 subject to the plat showing the additional right of way on the west side. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. >1 / ". --~" . I .' e I 1 I I:·, I; I 1 Ie I 1 I I I I I Ie I ( \, ç Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers 9, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 1301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3 - 895, City of North Richland Hills Fair Oaks Addition Lot 1, Block 13, Short Form Plat PS 86 - 36, Grid Map 42 ... < We have reviewed Knowlton - English - Flowers letter of 3uly 27,1986 and offer the following comments: . . 1. The width of the adjacent streets has been shown on the plat. 2. The owner agrees to pay his prorata share of the 16 inch water line in Bursey Road if required. The owner would sign a letter covenant to participate in his prorata share of any future street improvement adjacent to his property. 3. The building set back of 25 feet has been added to the plat. 4. This residence is presently served by a septic -- system and no problems have been experienced. The . owner does not wish to incurr the expense of another percolation test. Results of the last percolation test should be on file at the City offices. 4028 Daley, Suite 103 · North R ichland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 I' , · I e I' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (' ¡j . E. c:[ 5. No construction is planned within the Star Gas easement. 6. None required. 7. The owner is aware to to all applicable City codes and Sincerely Your Stembridge « Associates, Inc. cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ¡Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development .. < '----..... ;.. '; 11' ' 1. . ./ Ie I I 1/ I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas Ju 1 y 27, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills. 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-895, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FAIR OAKS ADDITION, LOT 1, BLOCK 13, SHORT FORr~ PLAT, PS 86 - 36, GRID MAP 42 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The width of the adjacent streets should be shown on the plat. 2 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 16-inch water line in Keller-Smithfield Road, if this has not already been paid. The owner should also be required to escrow his prorata share of future street improvements on Bursey Road. We would estimate prorata on the 16-inch water line at $4.00 per linear foot for one-half of an equivalent 6-inch water line for a total length of 487 feet. Prorata on the Bursey Road improvements is based on an estimated length of 203 feet. 3 A front building set-back line of 25 feet as required for AG zoning should be shown on the plat. 4 Plans for sewer service for this development have not been submitted for our review. We assume this property is being served by septic tank. We would suggest that percolation tests be performed and results furnished to the Health Department to determine if the existing system is in compliance with the appl icable regulations. 5 No construction should be permitted within the existing Lone Star Gas easenent wi thout the approv'a 1 of that Company. 6 We would note that since this plat has been submitted as a "Short Form Plat", no drainage or other engineering plans have been incl uded for our review, therefore, we cannot comment on any engineering considerations associated with this development. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I", · ,.- Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Subdivision Review Lett~ continued () FAIR OAKS ADDITION 7 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~~W. RICHARD w. ALBIN, P.E. ,- RWAI ra En c 1 0 sures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Developllent July 27, 1986 PS 86 - 36 PAGE 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: _Ubject: Council Meeting Date: 11/10/86 Request of Bill Fenimore, Wayne Wright, PS 86-39 (;harl.es wr1ght, and J.V. Frank for Replat: of Lot LOR, Agenda Number: Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 20R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition. The property is located on the southwest corner of Glenview drive and Dawn Drive. The purpose for the proposed plat is to revise the existing plat to eliminate the Lone Star Gas Company easement which at one time contained a high pressure natural gas line. The use of this line has now been abandoned and the easement returned to the applicants. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat Application PS 86-39 for Lot 20R, Block 4, Diamond Loch as submitted. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) - ~? - - ,,) . '/ )~ k __ ~~ - Departm· -t ~H~gnature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 P.s-~-I -......... ~"l.l ðUj,...... Ac ~ ~ S -I ' SU* l.1t. ~t.. '1.. - 2.. 4t ·ce,ec JIe I L ~I I J \ " " PS 8"-3.3 PARt::.EIlS SUB. L.. -/2.A I / --Æ/3 o 50J ~ ZO I G AP 0 N I· Ie OR DtNANCE NO. r IN R S ADO , . MA OR K CH~tRMAN, PLA I 1/ I" I I I" I ,I I I I I I Ie I I I I I Page 2 P & Z Minutes October 23, 1986 ( ( 2. PS 86-37 Request of Walker R Investment . for preliminary plat of , Block 1, Henry Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 86-37. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 3. PS 86-39 Request of Bill Fenimore, Wayne Wright, Charles Wright, & J.V. Frank for replat of Lot 20-R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition. PS 86-39 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 86-39. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. 4. PS 86-44 Request of Burk Collins Investments for final plat of Stonybrooke Sout Addition. PS 86-44 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion 0 approve PS 86-44. This motion seconded by Mr. Hallford and the tion carried 5-0. 5. PS 86-45 Request ge Moore for replat of Lots 14-R2 & 14-R2B, Block 7, Oak ition. C rman Bowen said since this is a eplat in duplex zoning there must be a Public Hearing. He opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this ~equest to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak in favor of this request, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. I Ie I ( ( ESTABLISHED 1880 GAREY W. GILLEY DON W. HICKEY C. RICHARD DAVIS. JR. STEPHEN H. ROBERSON BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS BROOKES BAKER (1902-19551 JOHN F. BAKER (1902-1985) S. J. BAKER. CONSULTANT FRED M. MORRIS. CONSULTANT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TITLE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING BROOKES BAKER BUILDING - 511 E. BLUFF STREET 817-335-7151 METRO 429-6119 FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76102-2293 I September 30, 1986 I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Ms. Wanda Calvert City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: Lot 20-R in Block 4 of Diamond Loch Addition PS-86-39 Dear Wanda: In response to the letter from City Engineer dated 9-10-86, we offer the following: 1. The purpose of this replat is to take the subject easement off the recorded map. This easement is not owned by the City of North Richland Hills and has been released to the owners of the lot per letter and partial release of easement enclosed. 2. The easement needed for the 18" water line can be acquired at the time the actual location of the line is determined. 3. A site grading and drainage plan was submitted and approved by the City when the new building was con~tructed. 4. City Staff function. 5. Noted to owner. If you have questions or desire additional information, please call. Sincerely, BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS ~ -#-.~;7~ Stephen H. Roberson SHR/bam I·' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ..~ ( ( GEO. A, WilLIS . Manager Records Controls & Special Services Dept. lone Star Gas Company 301 S. Horwood Street · Dallas, Texas 75201 March 24, 19R6 Bill J. Fenimore Builder, Inc. 610 Northeast Bank Tower Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Re: Partial Release of Easement Haltom City Oist., Trans R/W 9 Tarrant County, Texas Dear Mr. Fenimore: We are this date sending a Partial Release of Easement to the County Clerk of Tarrant County for recording purposes. For your information and ready reference, please find attached hereto, a copy of said Partial Release of Easement. Should further information be desired, please advise. Sincerely, ¿?I-£ L-'¿"(¿:' iJ. $cJ2cd}ÚÆtJ Brenda D. Salisbury ¡ :bds Attachment cc : J. V. Fra n k I I ." _ I I I I 'I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I I I_ I I I ." . ~ ( r PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMEN''f STATE OF TEXAS § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, under date of February 3, 1910, Mrs. M. J. Booth executed in favor of Lone Star Gas Company, that certain Right of Way and Easement Agreement, covering 160 acres of land, more or less, out of the W. A. Trimble Survey, Tarrant County, Texas, recorded in Volume 322, Page 401, Deed Records, said County and State; reference to which recorded instrument is h~reby had and made for any and all purposes in connection herewith; and WHEREAS, the corporate name of LONE STAR GAS COMPANY has been changed to ENSERCH CORPORATION, a Texas Corporation; and WHEREAS, ENSERCH CORPORATION has been requested to release the above mentioned Right of Way and Easement Agreement, insofar and only insofar as same might cover and include that certain 1.724 acre tract of land; as hereinafter set out: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), cash in hand paid by Bill J. Fenimore, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, ENSERCH CORPORATION does hereby release, relinquish and surrender from under the terms of the Right of Way and Easement Agreement said tract of land more fully described as follows to-wit: Being a 1.724 acre tract of land further described as Lot 20, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, recorded in Volume 388-130, Page 57, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; It is expressly understood and agreed that this partial release is limited to the premises specifically released herein, but as to the remainder of the land and premises covered by the said Right of Way and Easement Agreement and the land and rights reserved herein, same shall remain in full force and effect, in the same manner as though this partial release had not been executed. u:~ WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF this the 3 I day of , A.D., 1985. ~AV ATTEST: El'fSERCH CORPORATION ~V< ~~ /") I Š3t. Corporate M. K. Chapman By I~ I" e I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I I I- I I I ~ .... ( STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF <..~.2Nta.A..-J- § § § ( BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notar~ Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared ~xth'~i/: úJ, Cl.£/Þ-ti< , Attorney-in-Fact for ENSERCH CORPÖR TION, a Texas Corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to we that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed", in the capacity therein stated, and as the act and deed of said corporation. 9G~EN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the ~/,(.d- day of )¡ I?(j , A.D., 1985. ~ . , , I .I I .. '~U(l~ ~l..-1-L Notary Public in ahd for the State of Texas My Commission Expires 10,17- J? Print Name: ?~7k';f!./rl F,'~E ." ',.) 1 ;I~0 Ñ<-"!~'7¿l~ :"1., !(£~¿k- ~ El\J~bRCI-I CORPORATION c/o L()ì~E STAR GAS CO. . f 1700 ':Œ\1MERCE PLACE. 9th FLOOR) JO I s. 1~f\j1'~y'COD DALLr\S, 1-EXAS 75201 ..I".., . ~ l.:.tlth... .' ~).{..·¡.~Ck.·<- Sc?ß~~uc.;) t/. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 10, 1986 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission ~ City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-814, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DIAMOND LOCH ADDITION, LOT 20-R, BLOCK 4, REPLAT, PS 86 - 39, GRID MAP 147 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 There is a 20-foot wide Lone Star Gas Easement that should be shown on the plat which contains an abandoned gas main. This easement is now owned by the City of North Richland Hills, and the Volume and Page Number of the conveyance should also be noted on the plat. 2 The City is proposing to use the abandoned Lone star Gas easement for a major water transmission main. However, since a building is now constructed over the easement, the main will have to be routed around the building. The owner of the property should agree, as a condition of approval of this proposed replat, to grant to the City of North Richland Hills another 20-foot wide unobsttucted easement across this property as required for construction of the proposed 18-inch water transmission main if necessary. We would recommend that this agreement be covered in the City-Developer Agreement document since the alignment of the proposed water transmission main is not known at this time. 3 The developer has not submitted a topo or drainage plan with this replat for our review, however, the Drainage Master Plan shows (Topo Sheet No. A9) that a portion of this property drains to the southwest corner of the lot. We are not aware if there is a drainage problem at this site, but an existing storm drain is located along the west side of this property and a drop inlet could be constructed on this storm drain to collect the runoff which may pond at the southwest corner, if this becomes a problem. You may wish to have the developer's engineer investigate this further before approval of this proposed replat. We would note that residential lots 11, 12, and 13, Block 4, of the Diamond Loch Addition are located adjacent to this property at the southwest corner of the site and could be subject to flooding. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METROj267-3367 I Ie I I I I 'I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued DIAMOND LOCH ADDITION 4 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 5 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~aJ~~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development September 10, 1986 PS 86 - 39 PAGE 2 - - -r---- _~ _ h ., \Ñ (' J I '- ."- . I D I A 1 I I . I f , , , I I 4 , · f : I -- - .... - ~.. ~-- ..... -.. -.~ 01' .3 4 -----. - -- ---.... ~ .-. ~--- ~- --- . ~'-,~ ·-"20 u(i) . ~ -~ -'- ... . ~ . - . - . - . . - . .... , -'.- ~ - .. .. -~ --=.... : - ' - --. .... . -.,~ _ 5$ \" \ \ \ \ .. \ /. -' \ \ *" -' "'" \ V ,,*" 1 (' . I J ~ I I : I I : ~ ~ :1: I ~: I I : I :56 I I c.'=..7.9 - -- ~ -.. --- 52.8 .77 '\ - --- -~""" -- \~. ..,. ....... - - -- --- I \ ~:. í - :.1 \, / 55 ~ \1 H ~\\ ~; \,\ 54- . . ..' ~ ~ ~ -. . .' _.. - ."~. . / /' /0 // ./ ./ " /' ./ / ./ ./ /' ./ / / ,/ / /./ .9 I I I 6" ! c 4 6 44 ) I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 11/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Burk Collins Investments for Final ~lat ot ~tonybrooke ~outh Add1t10n. PS 86-44 Agenda Number: This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Stonybrooke South Addition. The property is located on the north side of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad and south of the existing Stonybrooke Addition. The subject tract is divided into areas of R-5D Duplex, R-8 Zero-lot-line Single Family, and R-2 Single Family Zoning. The proposed subdivision plat provides lots in each of the areas in conformance with the various District criteria. The Staff and the Engineer, in reviewing the proposed plat, had several comments for Commission consideration. 1) On several lots in the R-8 area1most of which are situated around the cul-de-sacs, the required minimum front lot dimension is accomplished by setting the front building line farther back into the lot than normal. The Engineer has included on the face of the plat a table which indicates which of the lots has the modified building line and what the required dimension is to be. 2) In the street layout three streets are shown on the east boundary of the subject tract to extend into properties belonging to others and ultimately to extend to Davis Boulevard. Odell Street connects with the existing street in place. Northeast Parkway is an extension of the street currently under construction in the adjacent industrial development which is also owned by the applicant. Stephanie Drive is proposed to extend through a residential and commercial tract which is zoned but has not yet developed. 3) In earlier discussions with the Commission on this proposed development the ~OSSibility of a street extension across the Railroad to provide access from this property to Amundson Road was considered. However, the current layout which provides three access routes to Davis Boulevard is sufficient for good circulation through the proposed development. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Final Plat Application on the Stonybrooke South Addition as submitted. - Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable ~1\(/~ f City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 R-3 R-3 I / I I I " I I I : \ " \ , \ , \ ' , " \ \ ,4-.. , I F.f? \ , AG AG I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I Page 2 P & Z Minutes October 23, 1986 ( 2. PS 86-37 PS 86-37 APPROVED 3. PS 86-39 4. PS 86-44 PS 86-44 APPROVED 5. PS 86-45 ( Request of Walker Real Estate & Investment, Inc. for prelimin plat of Lot 5, Block 1, Henry ition. th otion to approve s motion was seconded by and the motion carried of Bill Fenimore, Wayne Wright, Charles Wright, & J.V. Frank for replat of Lot 20-R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 86-39. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Burk Collins Investments for final plat of Stonybrooke South Addition. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 86-44. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Request of George Moore for Lots 14-R2A & 14-R2B, Block Hills Addition. Chairman Bowen said e this is a replat in duplex 1ng there must be a Public Hear He opened the Public He ng and called for those wishi to speak in favor of this est to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak in favor of this request, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. I I: . Ie' I:··.· .. ; " ;,·'t I' I I:· , ~:~:~ ~-,...,~ .: ",'. '......·.'t... ....... i ~'.~¡';;': ; . . :"} ?);: 1·.······'··'······..',)·1 . , ( ,¡ í I'" Ie· I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers 23,1986 1'¡'.'t>".J Planning & Zoning Commission, City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 ..: I Re: 3 - 858, Stonybrooke South Addition Block 1 Thru 7 P S 86 - 44 In response to Mr. Alb1ns letter dated October 23, 1986. ITEM NO.2: We have added the E. to the bearing on Lot 15, Block 5. ITEM NO.3: We have added a valve at the end of the line on Stephanie. ITEM NO.5: We ,will attain permits from the railroad after we receive approval of con$truction Plans. ITEM NO.6: We have signed the Drainage certificate on the Drainage Study. P.E. ~-. 4028 Daley, Suite 103 · North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 I 0" J . .. ~ . ~'/ Ie I I I I I I I lie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-F LOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas October 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-858, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS STONYBROOKE SOUTH ADDITION, BLOCKS 1 THROUGH 7, REVISED FINAL PLANS, PS 86 - 44, GRID MAP 70 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: Please refer to our review letter of the final plans dated September 29, 1986. 1 Item 1 of our 9/29/86 letter contains an error. The minimim lot width is 40 feet rather than 50 feet, therefore, ignore this comment. 2 !tan 5 -- "E" should be added to the bearing N 55-26-14 (E) on lot 15, block 5. 3 Itan 7 -- the water line has been upsized from 6 to 8 inch in Stephanie Drive as suggested, but a valve has not been added to the west end of the line. 4 Itan 9 -- follow-up on prorata requirements is suggested. 5 Item 10 have railroad permits been obtained? 6 Itan 11 drainage certificate on page 7 not signed yet. 7 Item 15 the plans have been revised to show 100-year concrete channel liner as indicated where possible. Revised plans and revised Hydraulics report should be submitted to FEMA for for their approval and for Rate Map revision. 8 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I·, · · ~ · Ie I I I I I I 1 lie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( STONYBROOKE SOUTH ADDITION Subdivision Review Letter continued Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~aJ W, ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R~JA/ ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development October 22, 1986 PS 86 - 44 PAGE 2 Ie I I, . '¡ . '1 ...,_::.,,':,......',:....,:.,'.:'.,'.:.".. ~~~' '~_-'~.: -:: < :. ·Ii· . I·:·t'.,::" ; , .:'t..'.'" ':." .":- '¡ ,:,;", ',' ,: I; "'.1 :'.. '¡ í ',¡.. I'J<~t!;;;~ ! . .~;' , ' '¡, ',,. .~. ~" . .,,1,:1, {),!"!',;! ,j :. I'"L., i~¡j;i¡¡rilr;) '. · :i.I¡,;'1',Jj\ : ; IÆf"" ":.'; ;):rr¡:) I;.'~.:i;.;....\'i.;. ,;¡. ¡'J:. ,:)';;:.;.il':.':':' ,:-;'¡ j :~i"~ _,;:;tli;: i Ii i I) I;"; I,' I 1 I I e I' I ( October 3,1986 Stembridge & Associates, I ~~. Consulting Engineers Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E.Loop 820 North R1chland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: Stony brook South Final Plat PS 86 We have received Knowlton English Flowers letter reviewing the above referenced subdivision. All engineering revisions and plat connections have been made and we are responding only to these items which we take exception to or that we feel need and explanation. Our comments are numbered the same as K-E-F letter and are as follows: 1 . Minimum lot widths permitted in R8 zoning The fifty foot frontage refers to a tract zoned. . .,.. . , 2. Removal of the cul-de-sac provides for a future access to Davis Blvd. 3. All lots listed either meet or exceed the living area per unit and the parking requirements. 4. The developer 1s requesting that these irregular shaped lots be considered in accordance with Section 24.18 of the zoning ordinance. Other comments will be complied with prior to filing of final plat. Sincerely, -----STEMBRIDGE & ASSOCIATES, INC. f)ø~J-P, jt-~~ Delbert R. Stembridge, .E. 4028 Daley, Suite 103 · North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 29, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-858, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS STONY BROOKE ADDITION, 8.1-7, FI NAL PLAT, PS 86 - 44, GRID MAP 70 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 76 out of 85 lots in the R8 Zoning of this plat do not meet the minimum 50 foot frontage on a public street requirement. 2 It has been observed that the majority of the lot and block numbers reviewed on the Preliminary Plat differ from those now shown on the Final Plat. It is assumed that this change is a result of removing the cul de sac in the Northwest corner of this subdivision from the Prelininary Plat. On the Southwest side of the Final Plat; however, Block 2 in Lot 43 should be Block 3. 3 In the Preliminary Plat review for this subdivision, the developer was asked to provide at least the minimum lot width (measured at the front building line) for the following lots listed below. In response to this request, the front building lines were moved a greater set back distance from the frontage line until the minimum lot width requirement was met. The developer should, however, be required to show that the area within the front and rear building lines of the lots in question can still adequately fulfill the minimum living area per unit and parking requirements for that zoning district. Refer to Preliminary Plat for these lots and block numbers: Lot 63 Block 2, Lots 16-19 Block 4, Lots 8 & 9 Block 5 - R5D Zoning; Lots 22 23 26 27 30-34 Block 1, Lots 21-27 34-37 Block 2, Lots 9-12 Block 3 - R8 Zoning; Lots 8 & 10 Block 1, Lots 2 5 6 & 7 Block 2 - R2 Zoning. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued STONYBROOKE ADDITION 4 It was stated in the Preliminary Plat review that several lots did not appear to meet the minimum average 100 foot depth requirement. These lots now refered to in the Final Plat as Lot 48 Block 2 - R5D Zoning; Lot 25 Block 2, Lot 33 Block 3 - R8 Zoning need to be corrected. 5 The bearings shown on the plat for lots 13 and 15 of block 5 are not complete (should be N 55-26-14 E ?). 6 Fire hydrant coverage should be based on 300-foot radius requirement for all R-8 and R-5-D areas and so shown on the water layout sheet. 7 We would recommend that the proposed 6-inch water line in Stephanie Drive west of Tessa Drive be upsized to 8-inch diameter for future extension westward. Also, a valve should be installed at the west end of this line. a The proposed 6-inch sanitary sewer lines in Stephanie Drive should be upsized to 8-inch lines as required for future extension westward. 9 Prorata payments on the existing 8, 10, and 12-inch sanitary sewers located within or along the platted area are required if any of these lines were constructed under City contracts. Recoup agreements may be in effect, as covered in prior City-Developer agreements, if any or all of these lines were installed by private developers. The Public Works Department should be consulted in this matter. 10 See comments in our January 27, 1986, letter regarding permits from the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad Co. for drainage construction within the railroad right-of-way. 11 The engineer's drainage certifi~ation statement should be signed. 12 A channel access ramps are provided for channel IIC" within the Railroad right-of-way which also permits access to channel "A", also, an access ramp is provided for channel "B", as shown on the detail plan-profile drainage sheets. We would request that these access ramps also be shown (or noted) on the drainage layout sheet, page 7 of 32, for clarity. 13 We would recommend that some kind of guard rails or fence be constructed along all proposed channel access ramps. Also, instead of a guard chain or cable at the entrance of each access ramp, the Public Works Department may require a chain link gate instead. 14 The proposed box culvert at Crystal Lane is correctly shown as a 2-barrel 10x4 box culvert on the plan-profile sheet (sheet 10 of 32), but is incorrectly shown on the drainage layout sheet (7 of 32), and should be corrected on sheet 7. September 29, 1986 PS 86 - 44 PAGE 2 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued STONYBROOKE ADDITION 15 We would note that based on the hydraulic calculations presented in the Drainage Study prepared by Anderson Engineers, Inc., for this project that the proposed channel improvements are designed to carry only the 25-year flow within the concrete lined portion of the channels and carry the 100-year flow within the grassed-lined overbank portion of the channel, as provided in the Subdivision Drainage Ordinance under "Partial 100-year Concrete Channel Liner". The option for partial, or 25-year, concrete channel liner protection is provided "if the 100-year fully channel contained water surface is above the natural ground line and levees are not approved or flood plain fill is not feasible, then the concrete channel liner shall be extended to the natural ground line along each side of the channel. In no case shall the concrete lined channel capacity provided be less than that required to convey the 25-year frequency . discharge". Since fill is being brought in on portions of the proposed channels to build up the overbanks to heights above the 100-year level, and also since the natural ground in some sections of the channels is already above the 100-year level, we would recommend that the concrete channel liner be extended to fully contain the 100-year flow on all channel sections of this proposed development unless this requirement is waived by the City Council. (*** COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED HERE ***). 16 Based on Table 3.2-1, page 15, IIChannel Design Conditions for Walker Branch Tributary Stream W-4" in the Anderson Hydraulics report (this is channel "B" shown on sheet 10 of the plans), the grassed top of channel required to contain the 100-year flow (incuding I-foot freeboard) does not match the channel top elevations shown in the profile on sheet 10 from station 0+00 to about station 7+00. The proposed top of channel needs to be raised about I-foot to match the elevations noted in the Anderson report. We would note, however, if a full concrete channel liner section is used, the proposed top of bank shown in the profile may be adequate to convey the laO-year flow. 17 After approval by you and the Council of the proposed drainage plan, the developer should submit Hydraulics Study report to FEMA for approval of the proposed channel modifications and for amendment of the Flood Insurance Study Rate Map. If you require full 100-year concrete channel improvements then portions of the Hydraulics Study report will have to be revised in addition to the construction plans before submittal to FEMA. 18 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for September 29, 1986 PS 86 - 44 PAGE 3 I Ie I I I I I I I 'Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued STONYBROOKE ADDITION all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~~ R I C HARD W. AL BIN, P. E. ' R\~A/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development September 29, 1986 PS 86 - 44 PAGE 4 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (,- (~ KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 27, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-858, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS STONY BROOKE SOUTH ADDITION, BLOCKS 1 THRU 6, PRELIMINARY PLAT, PS 86 - 4, GRID MAP 70 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: I We would recommend that the name of this proposed subdivision be changed from the Stonybrooke South Addition to the Stonybrooke Addition since this development is contiguous with the Stonybrooke Additon. Also the lot and block number should be changed accordingly. 2 This proposed development requires concrete channel improvements on the Walkers Branch Channel and on a Tributary of Walkers Branch. Most of the proposed platted area is located within the IOO-year flood plain. Although the proposed channel improvement dimensions are close to the channel sizes presented in the Drainage Master Plan, we would recommend that the developer's hydraulics engineer be required to furnish HEC-2 profiles on both channels showing that they have sufficient capacity to contain the lOa-year discharge within the banks of the channels- taking into account downstream backwater effects at the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad bridge, and at the proposed new bridge culvert on the street which crosses the tributa~ channel. The HEC-2 runs should cover the full length of the two channels within the limits of the proposed platting. The HEC-2 run on the main Walkers Branch channel should start downstream from the Railroad Bridge. The HEC-2 run on the tributary channel should start at the intersection with the main Walkers Branch channel, and the proposed box culvert should be included in the profile model. The proposed 1-IO'x81 box culvert appears to be too small, but a HEC-2 run will verify the adequacy of the design. We would further recommend that cross-sections used for the two HEC-2 runs be provided at a minimum of about 200-foot intervals. The proposed construction plans along with the supporting hydraulic data should be submitted to FEMA for approval and for application for a Flood Insurance Rate Map amendment. 3 Written permission from the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company should be obtained for concentrated discharge across their right-of-way. Improvements on the railroad right-of-way in the vicinity of the bridge crossing may be required. Also, permission for construction of the 1901 CENTRAL DR.. SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Subdivision Review <::ter continued ~:'~YBROOKE SOUTH ADDITION proposed underground storm drain on their right-of-way will be required. The developer's engineer should prepare an easement on the right-of-way to cover the storm drain construction, and this easement should be transmitted to the Railway Company for approval. If the Railway Company does not approve construction of the storm drain on their right-of-way, then the storm drain should be moved northward onto the proposed platted property and an easement dedicated along the south line of the subdivision. 4 The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat. 5 The width of the streets should be shown on the plat. 6 The bearings on the north lines of Lot 13 Block 3, Lots 13 and 15 Block 4 are not correct. 7 Lot 63 Block 2, Lots 16 thru 19 Block 4, Lots 8 and 9 Block 5 appear to be less than the 70-foot minimum width measured at the building line and Lot 48 Block 2 less than the 100-foot average mimimum depth required for R-5-D zoning. 8 Lots 22, 23, 26, 27, 30 thru 34 Block 1; Lots 21 thru 27, 34 thru 37 Block 2; and Lots 9 thru 12 Block 3 appear to be less than the the 40-foot mimimum width measured at the building line and Lot 34 Block 1 and Lot 33 Block 2 appear to be less than the 100-foot minimum depth required for R-8 zoning. 9 Lots 8 and 10 Block 1 and Lots 2, 5, 6, and 7 Block 2 appear to be less than the 70-foot minimum width measured at the building line and Lots 9 and 11 Block 1 appear to be less than the 100-foot average minimum depth required for R-2 zoning. 10 The 6-inch water line in Odell Street should be changed to an 8-inch water line and valves should be added at the intersection of Odell Street and Whitney Way and before the plug at the end of the line. Valves should be added on the 8-inch water line in Ruthette Drive at the intersection with Tessa Drive and on the 8-inch water line in Northeast Parkway before the plug. 11 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 8, 10 and 12-inch sanitary sewers if this has not already been paid. 12 The 35-foot drainage easement between Lots 47 and 48 Block 2 is also shown as 25 feet (10 feet on Lot 48 and 15 feet on Lot 47), which is correct? 13 A drainage easement is needed along the south of Block 2 for the proposed 60-inch RCP. January 27, 1986 PS 86 - 4 2 PAGE I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I r. Subdivision Review ( "ter continued ~NYBROOKE SOUTH ADDITION 14 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory cod es. Please call if you have any questions. , w,~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development January 27, 1986 PS 86 - 4 3 PAGE I ~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ANDERSON ENGINEERS, INC. lAf\JD & WATER ENGINEERING October 3, 1986 13740 Midway Rood · Suite 608 . Dallos. Texas 75244 . 214-960-9977 Mr. Jackey Fluitt Stembridge & Associates, Inc. 4Ø28 Daley Avenue - Suite 1Ø3 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 re: Stonybrooke South Addition - Walker Branch - Tributary W-4 Dear Mr. Fluitt: As you requested on October 1, 1986, we have completed a revision to the_ improved model of the Stream Tributary W-4 of Walker Branch to contain 1ØØ- yr water surface elevations within the concrete channel. Due to the changes in the model, the fOllowing were concluded; 1. no change in the channel flow line, side slopes, and bottom width design are required and they will stay the same as concluded earlier in the report of August 2, 1986; 2. 1ØØ yr water surface elevations are slightly higher than those of the August report through the site, however still are lower than those of the existing conditions; 3. 1ØØ yr water surface elevations upstream of the site match exactly those of the August report. The attached HEC-2 model output is to replace that of appendix 3-c of the August report. Also the attached cross sections plots should replace those of the appendix 6-b of the same report. Profile of Tributary W-4 in appendix 5 is to be replcced by the rittached profile. This letter along with the August 2, 1986 report should be sufficient for presentation to the City of North Richland Hills far their reviews. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely ANDERSON ENGINEERS INC. ¡./.¿f~~. Mahmoud El.Sabagh Staff Engineer enclosures REGISTERED ALABAMA ARKANSAS COLORAOO ILLINOIS LOUISIANA MISSOURI NEW MEXICO TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 1****************************************************** * WATER SURFACE PROFILES * VERSION OF NOVEMBER 1976 * UPDATED MAY 1984 * IBM-PC-XT VERSION * RUN DATE 1fJ/fJ2/86 TIME 89:26:52 - - - - .. ***********************************************.****** . -************************************** * u.s. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * * THE HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * * SfJ9 SECOND STREET, SUITE D * * DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 * * (916) 44ø-21e5 (FTS) 448-21Ø5 * *************************************** x x XXXXXXX )(XXX)( )(XXX)( x x x x x x x x x x x x XXXXXXX XXX)( x )(XXX)( )(XXX)( x x x x x x x x x x x x x XXXXXXX )(XXX)( XXXXXXX 1Ø/Ø2/86 fJ9:26:53 PAGE ************************************************** THIS RUN EXECUTED 1Ø/Ø2/86 89:26:54 IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q WSEL FQ fJ. .8ØØØøØ .fJø .8 ø. S22.71fJ .fJøø XSECV XSECH FN ALLDC IBW CHNIM ITRACE .øøø .fJøø .fJøø .øøø .fJeø .fJøø .fJøø HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - fJ1,Ø2,Ø3,84,85.86 MODIFICATION - 58,51.52.53.54.55.56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION ************************************************** C T1 T2 T3 WALKERS BRANCH - TRIBUTARY W-4 - IMPROVED CONDITIONS TRIBUTARY W-4 - 1fJØ VR EXISTING CONDITIONS DISCHARGE TRIBUTARY W-4. TEXAS - NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (E842 - W4IMPRV) J1 ICHECK INQ NINV 1 . 2. fJ. J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS 1.ØØØ .fJøø -1.8ØØ J3 VARIABLE CODES FOR SUMMARY PRINTOUT 1SØ.ØØØ .øøø .øøø .øøø .fJøø .øøø .øøø .fJeø .fJøø J5 LPRNT NLt1SEC ********REQUESTED SECTION NUMBERS******** .fJøø I -1Ø.ØØØ ."øø .8ØØ .8ØØ .8ØØ .8ØØ .8ØØ .8Ø" .8ØØ .8ØØ Ie QT 3."ØØ 175Ø.ØØØ 172".8Ø" 23Ø2.8Ø" .ffØØ .fJøø .8ØØ .fJøø .8ØØ .fJøø NC .878 .fJ8fJ .828 .188 .38" .8ØØ .8ØØ .8ØØ .øøø .øøø ** DOWNSTREAM LIMITS OF THE PROJECT ·STONV8ROOKE SOUTH ADDITION~ *** I CROSS SECTION ON WALKERS BRANCH X1 5739Ø.8ØØ 6.ØØØ 1344.588 1397.428 1fJØ.fJfJØ 1fJØ.fJØØ 1ØØ.fJfJØ .fJøø .ffØØ .11Ø0 I GR 63Ø.ØØØ 1ØØØ.ØØø 63Ø.1108 1344.58Ø 617.58Ø 1357.fJØØ 617.58Ø 1385.fJØØ 63Ø.ØØØ 1397.42Ø GR 63Ø.ØØØ 211Ø.8Ø0 .fJø" .lJøø .lJøø .fJø" .8Ø" .fJø" .øøø .fJøø I X1 5764Ø.ØØØ 6.ØØ" 1344.48Ø 1397.52Ø 1ØØ.ØØØ 7ØØ.fJØØ 25Ø.8ØØ .fJøø .fJøø .11ØØ GR 631.117Ø 1ØØØ.fJØø 631.87Ø 1344.4821 618.55Ø 1357.11ØØ 618.55Ø 1385.fJØØ 631.fJ7Ø 1397.52Ø GR 631.Ø7" 211Ø.fJØØ .ffØØ .fffJ8 .8ØØ .fJøø .fJøø .øøø .øøø .fJøø I QT 3.8ØØ 6ØØ.ØØØ 515.ØØ" 725.8ØØ .11ØØ .fJøø .ffØØ .fJøø .8ØØ .8ØØ NC .fJ4Ø .84fJ .82fJ .fJØØ .fJø" .8ØØ .fJØØ .fJøØ .øøø .fJøø I START OF TRIBUTARY W-4 *** TRAPEZOIDAL SECTION: 12ft BOTTOM WIDTH AND 1:1 SIDE SLOPE *** *** F.L I ELEVATION 622.15 NGVD *** I 1Ø/Ø2/86 89:26:53 PAGE 2 I X1 1.ØØØ e.øøø 1599.15" 1624.85Ø 1711.fJØ" 14Ø.ØØØ 15Ø.fJØ" .øøø .fJøø .øøø GR 63Ø.ØØØ 1ØØØ.fJØø 628.8ØØ 1588.75£1 626.fJfJ" 1599.15Ø 622.15Ø 16Ø3.ØØØ 622. 15" 162Ø.fJØØ Ie GR 626.8ØØ 1624.85Ø 628.8Ø" 1635.25Ø 63Ø.f)Ø" 234Ø.fJØØ .11ØØ .øøØ .8ØØ . £Ie" NC .øøø .fJøø .828 .3ØØ .5"" .fJøø .øøø .fJeø .fJø" .fJøø X1 1.3ØØ e.øøø 1656.55" 1677.55Ø 3Ø.8ØØ 3Ø."ØØ 3fJ.fJØØ .fJøø .fJøØ .øøØ I X3 1Ø.ØØØ .£1.0.0 .fJø" .fJ"ø .fJøø .8ØØ .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø GR 632.ØØØ 1fJøØ.fJØø 63".11"Ø 1658.fJØØ 638.fJØ" 1656.55Ø 622.25Ø 1656.55Ø 622.25Ø 1677.550 GR 63Ø."ØØ 1677.558 63Ø.fJØØ 168Ø.1fJØ 632.fJø0 234Ø.Ø0Ø .fJøø .fJøø .øøø .øøø I S8 1.25Ø 1.81Ø 3."Ø" .fJøø 21."Ø" : 1 . øøø sø.fJøø .800 622.5ØØ 622.250 *** PROPOSED CRYSTAL LANE CROSSING *** I *** 2-1Ø'XS' BOX CUlVERT *** *** F.l @ ELEVATION 622.25 D.S AND @ ELEVATION 622.50 NGVD U.S *** I X1 1.8ØØ .fJ"ø .880 ."øfJ 5fJ.aø" 5fJ."fJØ sø.a"ø .fJøø .2SØ .fJøø X2 .fJ"ø .fJfJfJ 1.fJØ" 626.5fJfJ 63Ø.fJfJfJ .ff"Ø ."fJfJ .fJøø .8fJØ .øøø X3 1Ø.ØØØ .øøa .8aø .øøø .fJøø .fJøø .øøø .fJøø .øøø .øøø I 8T -4.ØØØ 1fJØØ.8ØØ 63Ø.ØfJØ .fJøø 1656.55Ø 53Ø.fJfJØ 626.5øa 1677.55Ø 63Ø."ØØ 626.5ØØ BT .øøø 234fJ.8ØfJ 63Ø.ØØØ .ffaø .fJøø .BfJa .øøø .fJøø .øøø .fJøø NC .fJøø ."8Ø .fJøø .1fJfJ .38Ø .fJ8fJ .8fJ8 .""8 .fJøø .fJøø I QT 3.8ØØ 555.fJØØ 485.8fJØ 685.88fJ .fJøø .fJaa .fJøø .8aa .fJøø .øfJa *** TRAPEZOIDAL SECTION: 12ft BOTTOM WIDTH AND 1:1 SIDE SlOPE *** I *** F.L I ELEVATION 622.61 NGVD *** Ie 2 I I X1 2.588 9.8ØØ 1484.11fJ 15Ø7.898 78.fJ8Ø 7fJ.fJfJ8 78.fJ8fJ .8fJfJ .8fJ8 .8ØØ GR 632.8ØØ 1fJØØ.8ØØ 638.888 114fJ.88Ø 628.88Ø 148fJ.21fJ 628.5Ø8 1484. , 18 622.618 149Ø.8ØØ Ie GR 622.618 15Ø2.8ØØ 628.58Ø 15fJ7.89fJ 628.8fJfJ 1513.79Ø 63Ø.fJfJØ 285Ø.8fJ8 .fJfJø .øø£1 *** TRAPEZOIDAL SECTION: 12ft BOTTOM WIDTH AND 1:1 SIDE SLOPE *** I *** F.L I ELEVATION 622.81 NGVD *** X1 4.fJØ£1 1fJ.fJØØ 16Ø2.218 1625.79Ø 15Ø.ØØØ 15fJ.8ØØ 15Ø.fJØØ .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø I GR 634.8ØØ 1ØØØ.ØØø 632.80Ø 128Ø.8ØØ 63Ø.6ØØ 1594.218 628.688 16Ø2.21Ø 622.81fJ 1608.fJØØ GR 622.81Ø 162Ø.8ØØ 628.6ØØ 1625.79Ø 63Ø.6ØØ 1633.79Ø 632.ØØØ 216Ø.Ø£1Ø 634.8ØØ 22SØ.ØØØ I *** TRAPEZOIDAL SECTION: 12ft BOTTOM WIDTH AND 1:1 SIDE SLOPE *** *** F.L I ELEVATION 623.48 NGVD *** I X1 7.fJØØ 12.8ØØ 1452.6ØØ 1475.4fJØ 3ØØ.fJØØ 38Ø.fJ88 3ØØ.8Ø8 .88Ø .8ØØ .8ØØ GR 636.88Ø 18ØØ.8ØØ 634.88Ø 1265.fJ8Ø 632.888 1378.fJ88 638.fJØ8 1447.88Ø 628.88Ø 1452.6ØØ GR 623.488 1458.88Ø 623.48Ø 147Ø.fJØØ 628.88Ø 1475.488 63Ø.8Ø8 1481.8ØØ 632.fJ88 18ØØ.8ØØ I GR 634.8ØØ 185fJ.8ØØ 636.8fJØ 194fJ.8ØØ .8fJfJ .fJ0Ø .8ØØ .8ØØ .fJøø .øøø 1 1Ø/82/86 Ø9:26:53 PAGE 3 I QT 3.fJØØ s5Ø.ØØØ 48Ø.fJØØ 7fJØ.fJØØ .fJfJø .fJ8Ø .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .øøø I *** TRAPEZOIDAL SECTION: 12ft BOTTOM WIDTH AND 1:1 SIDE SLOPE *** *** F.L I ELEVATION 624.43 NGVD *** Ie X1 1Ø.9ØØ .fJ8Ø .8ØØ .8ØØ 39Ø.fJØØ 39Ø.8Ø0 390.ØØØ .8ØØ 1.038 .øøø *** TRAPEZOIDAL SECTION: 22ft BOTTOM WIDTH AND 1:1 SIDE SLOPE *** I *** F.L I ELEVATION 631.81 NGVD *** *** UPSTREAM LIMITS OF THE PROJECT ·STONV8ROOKE SOUTH ADDITION" *** I X1 11.8ØØ 18.ØØØ 139Ø.218 1419.79Ø 1S.8ØØ 1fJ.8Ø0 1Ø.ØØØ .søø .8ØØ .øøø SR 64Ø.8ØØ 1fJØØ.fJØø 64fJ.ØØØ 1Ø7s.fJØØ 639.718 -1377.88Ø 635.6fJØ 139Ø.21Ø 631.81fJ 1394.ØØØ GR 631.81Ø 1416.fJØØ 635.6ØØ 1419.798 639.718 1432. 128 64Ø.8ØØ 145Ø.fJØØ 64Ø.ØØØ 154Ø.ØØØ I NC .fJøø .fJøø .84Ø .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .8ØØ END OF CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS I NATURAL SECTION X1 11.85Ø 7.SØØ 18ØØ.Øøø 1548.Ø8Ø S.IJøø s.S88 S.fJØ" .8ØØ .IJøø .ftøø I GR 64Ø.ÐØØ 1ØØØ.8ØØ 638.8ØØ 1875.8ØØ 634.68Ø 1378.8ØØ 634.8ØØ 1395.8ØØ 635.ØØØ 142Ø.ØØØ GR 638.8ØØ 145Ø.ØØØ 64Ø.ØØØ 154Ø.ØØØ .fJøø .8ØØ .øøø .fJ8Ø .øøø .Øøø X1 15.ØØØ 14.fJØØ 1418.8ØØ 149Ø.8ØØ 395.fJfJfJ 395.88Ø 395.fJfJfJ .8ØfJ .fJIJø .fJøø I GR 65fJ.ØØfJ 1fJfJØ.fJØø 648.8ØØ 1IJ3fJ.8fJØ 646.8ØØ 1fJ7fJ.fJØØ 644.88Ø 111fJ.fl8Ø 642.8£1Ø 1260.800 GR 648.ØØ0 141fJ.fJØ0 638.880 1428.fJ8Ø 638.888 1478.fJ8£1 64Ø.fJØØ 149Ø.8ØØ 642."ØØ 16Ø£1.ØØØ GR 642.8ØØ 183Ø.8Ø£1 644.ØØ8 1878.8ØØ 646."8Ø 195".888 658."ØØ 2ØØØ."Øø .8ØØ .8ØØ I X1 16.78Ø .8£1Ø .88Ø .8ØØ 178.fJØ8 178.8ØØ 178.888 .flØØ 2.88£1 .8Ø8 Ie 3 I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I EJ 1 .fJßø .fJøø .fJøe .IØØ .fJøø .fJøø ."eø .8eø .fJßø .8eø 1Ð/Ø2/86 fJ9:26:53 PAGE 4 ************************************************** THIS RUN EXECUTED 1e/ø2/86 e9:27:25 HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CaRR - 81.82.83.84.85.86 MODIFICATION - 5Ø.51.52.53.54,55.56 IBM-PC-xr VERSION ************************************************** T1 T2 T3 WALKERS BRANCH - TRIBUTARV W-4 - IMPROVED CONDITIONS TRIBUTARV W-4 - 2S VR UlTIMATE CONDITIONS DISCHARGE TRIBUTARV W-4. TEXAs - NORTH RICHlAND HILLS (E842 _ W4IMPRV) J1 ICHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVI~ Q t..5EL FQ s. .fJøøøøø .8Ø .8 fJ. 622.33Ø .Søø XSECV XSECH FN ALlDC IBW CHNIM ITRACE .SØ8 .øøø .8ØØ .8SØ .øøø .Søø .øøø PAGE 5 1. 3. fJ. J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS 2.ØØØ .søø -l.8ØØ 1Ø/Ø2/86 89:26:53 ************************************************** THIS RUN EXECUTED 1Ø/82/86 S9:27:39 HEC2 RELEASE DATED NaV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CaRR - 81.82.Ø3.Ø4.85.S6 MODIFICATION - 5Ø.51,52.53.54.55,56 IBM-PC-xr VERSION ************************************************** T1 T2 T3 WALKERS BRANCH - TRIBUTARV W-4 - IMPROVED CONDITIONS TRIBUTARV W-4 - 188 VR UlTIMATE CONDITIONS DISCHARGE TRIBUTARV W-4, TEXAS - NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (E842 _ W4IMPRV) I J1 I CHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q t..5EL FQ 1. 4. fJ. 8. .fJøøøøe .Sø .fJ fJ. 624.22Ø .øøø I J2 NPROF IPLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FN AllDC JBW CHNIM IT RACE ¡ 1S.fJØØ .fJøø -1.fJØØ .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .fJøø .øøø I Ie 4 I I 1Ø/02/86 fJ9:26:53 PAGE 6 Ie I THIS RUN EXECUTED 18/Ø2/86 Ø9:27:56 ************************************************** HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 I ERROR CORR - Ø1,82,Ø3,Ø4,Ø5,Ø6 MODIFICATIO'I - 5Ø,51,52,53,54,55,56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION ************************************************** I NOTE- ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OF CROSS-SECTION NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST I TRIBUTARY W-4, TEXAS - N I StmARY PR INTOUT TABLE 15Ø I SECNO XLCH ELTRD ELLC ELMIN Q ~EL CRIWS EG 1ØK*S VCH AREA .01K 5739Ø.ØØØ .8Ø .øø .øø 617.58 175Ø.ØØ 622.71 .øø 624.36 3Ø.26 1Ø.30 169.96 318.11 I 5739Ø.fJØØ .fJø .øø .øø 617.58 172Ø.ØØ 622.33 .øø 624.23 37.95 11 . Ø6 155.56 279.21 5739Ø.ØØØ .øø .øø .øø 617.58 2302.Ø0 624.22 .fJø 625.78 21.7Ø 1Ø.Ø1 23Ø.Ø1 494. 17 Ie 5764Ø.Ø00 25Ø.fJØ .fJø .fJø 618.55 175Ø.fJØ 623.37 .øø 625.27 37.47 1 1 . Ø7 158.Ø7 285.88 57640.Ø0Ø 25Ø.fJØ .øø .øø 618.55 172Ø.Ø0 623.27 .øø 625.2Ø 38.79 11.14 154.41 276.16 5764Ø.ØØØ 25Ø.fJØ .fJø .fJø 618.55 23Ø2.fJØ 624.57 .øø 626.53 3Ø.28 11.23 2Ø5.ØØ 418.34 I * 1 . fJøø 15Ø.ØØ .øø .afJ 622.15 6ØØ.fJØ 625.28 625.28 626.63 48.24 9.33 64.32 86.38 * 1.fJØØ 15fJ.fJØ .aø .aø . 622.15 515.ØØ 625.ØØ 625.fJØ 626.24 49.27 8.95 57.55 73.37 * 1.ØØØ 15fJ.fJfJ .fJfJ .fJø 622. 15 725.fJØ 625.68 625.68 627.17 46.53 9.78 74. 15 lØ6.29 I 1.3ØØ 3fJ.aø .fJfJ .øfJ 622.25 6ØØ.fJØ ':625.94 .fJø 626.87 28.18 7.72 77.74 113.Ø3 1.3ØØ 3fJ.fJ" .øø .fJfJ 622.25 515.fJØ 625.7fJ .øø 626.48 25.65 7. 11 72.44 101.69 I 1.3fJØ 3fJ.8fJ .BfJ .afJ 622.25 725.8Ø 626. 14 .fJfJ 627.37 35.54 8.88 81.66 121.61 1.8fJØ 5fJ.afJ 63fJ.8fJ 626.5fJ 622.58 6fJfJ.afJ 626.86 .afJ 627.53 17.36 6.55 91.55 144.Ø2 1.8fJfJ 5fJ.8fJ 63Ø.88 626.58 622.5fJ 515.88 626. 17 .8fJ 626.86 21.29 6.68 77.09 111.61 I * 1.888 5Ø.88 638.fJ8 626.5Ø 622.58 725.8fJ 627.79 .8fJ 628.45 14.42 6.53 111.09 19Ø.91 2.5ØØ 7Ø.8" .fJfJ .fJa 622.61 565.8fJ 626.68 .afJ 627.84 34.56 8.64 65.40 96.11 I * 2.5ØØ 7a.aø .BfJ .BfJ 622.61 485.fJfJ 625.95 625.95 627.34 5fJ.76 9.46 51.26 68.Ø7 2.5ØØ 7fJ.afJ .fJfJ .fJø 622.61 685.fJfJ 627.71 .fJø 628.66 22.74 7.85 87.21 143.64 4.fJØØ 15Ø.fJØ .øfJ .8fJ 622.81 565.fJØ 627.44 .8Ø 628.28 21.88 7.34 76.99 12Ø.78 I 4.fJØØ 15Ø.fJØ .fJø .fJø 622.81 485.8fJ 627.13 .fJ8 627.87 20.57 6.87 7Ø.57 1Ø6.95 4.fJØØ 15Ø.8Ø .fJø .8fJ 622.81 685.fJØ 628.13 .fJfJ 628.99 19.45 7.42 92.27 155.31 I 7.fJØØ 3ØØ.fJØ .fJø .ftfJ 623.4fJ 565.fJØ 628. 12 .8" 628.91 20.39 7. 16 78.96 125.11 7.ØØØ 3Ø8.fJfJ .fJø .ftø 623.48 485.fJfJ 627.76 .8fJ 628.48 19.97 6.8Ø 71.32 le8.54 i' 5 I I 7.e88 3ø8.e8 .~8 .88 623.48 6S5.~8 628.72 .88 629.58 19.61 7.44 92.81 154.7Ø Ie 1fJ/fJ2/86 89:26:53 PAGE 7 SECNO XLCH ELTRD ELLC ElMIN Q a.JSEL CRIWS EG 1ØK*S VCH AREA .Ø1K I 1fJ.9ØØ 398.8Ø .fJfJ .e8 624.43 558.e8 628.92 .e8 629.78 23.e9 7.42 74.fJ8 114.47 1fJ.9ØfJ 39fJ.ØfJ .SfJ .S8 624.43 4SfJ.e8 628.54 .øfJ 629.36 23.9Ø 7.23 66.4Ø 98. 19 I 1fJ.9ØØ 39fJ.ØØ .fJ8 .S8 624.43 7SfJ.e8 629.45 .fJ8 63Ø.49 25.89 8. 19 85.5fJ 139.75 * 11.ØØØ 1B.ØØ .S8 .a8 631.81 558.e8 634.39 634.39 635.56 48.78 8.68 63.36 78.75 * 11.ØØØ 18.ØØ .afJ .aø 631.81 48Ø.fJ8 634. 17 634. 17 635.25 49.76 8.34 57.56 68.Ø5 I * 11.ØØØ 1B.ØØ .afJ .S8 631.81 7ØØ.ØØ 634.81 634.81 636.16 47.62 9.34 74.94 1 ø 1 . 44 * 11.fJ58 5.Ø8 .Ø8 .sø 634. S8 558.88 635.63 635.63 636.fJ2 264.3Ø 5.8fJ 11fJ.IJ1 33.83 I * 11.fJ5fJ 5.IJ8 .S8 .SfJ 634 . øø 48IJ.fJe 635.56 635.56 635.92 265.12 4.84 99.22 29.48 11 . Ø5fJ 5.fJfJ .fJfJ .SfJ 634.8Ø 7eø.fJø 636.1Ø 635.78 636.31 99.42 3.68 198. 18 78.2Ø , I 15.fJØØ 395.fJØ .Ø8 .80 638.8Ø 558.88 64Ø.fJ7 .øø 648.33 58.87 4.fJ5 136.21 71.68 15.fJØØ 395.fJØ .88 .fJ8 638.fJ8 488.fJfJ 639.94 .fJ8 648. 17 57.63 3.83 125.48 63.23 15.fJØØ 395.fJØ .88 .S0 638.fJfJ 7SfJ.sø 641t fJ 1 .8S 64Ø.46 1S7.13 5.33 131.23 67.63 I 16.7fJØ 17fJ.fJØ ~8Ø .88 648.88 558.SØ 641 . 51 .fJfJ 642.86 186.54 5.95 92.46 4Ø.27 16.7fJfJ 17fJ.fJfJ .sø .S8 648. e8 488.88 641.38 .88 641.98 193.52 5.76 83.38 34.5Ø 16.7ØfJ 17Ø.fJØ .SS .Ø8 648.S8 78Ø.S8 641 . 94 .Ø8 642.42 123.66 5.68 125. 18 62.95 I 1 1Ø/fJ2/86 fJ9:26:53 PAGE 8 Ie TRIBUTARY W-4, TEXAS - N I SUMMARY PRINTOUT TABLE 15Ø I SECNO Q a.JSEl DIFWSP DIFJ,5X DIFKWS TOPWID XlCH 5739Ø.fJØØ 175Ø.8Ø 622.71 .sø .S8 .S8 38.26 .S8 5739fJ.fJfJØ 172fJ.SfJ 622.33 -.38 .S8 .S8 37.5e .øa I 5739fJ.fJfJ8 23Ø2.88 624.22 1.89 .S8 .fJe 41.28 .fJfJ 5764Ø.fJØØ 175fJ.8Ø 623.37 .fJfJ .66 .fJfJ 37.63 25fJ.fJfJ I 5764Ø.ØØØ 172Ø.ØØ 623.27 -.1fJ .94 .8Ø 37.44 2sfJ.ØØ 5764fJ.ØØØ 23Ø2.fJØ 624.57 1.31 .35 .S8 48.85 258.fJØ I * 1.ØØØ 6ØØ.8fJ 625.28 .fJø 1.91 .SØ 24.Ø8 15Ø.fJØ * 1.fJfJfJ 515.fJfJ 625.ØfJ -.28 1.73 .efJ 23.43 15Ø.ØfJ * 1 . øøø 725.eø 625.68 .69 1.11 .eø 24.98 15fJ.eø I 1.300 6ØØ.fJØ 625.94 .øfJ .66 .mø 21 . fJø 3Ø.ØØ 1.3ØØ 515.ØØ 625.78 -.25 .7e .eø 21. øØ 3Ø.fJØ 1.3ØØ 725.fJØ 626. 14 .45 .46 .se 21 . øØ 38.8fJ I Ie 6 I I 1.8ØØ 6ØØ.fJØ 626.86 .fJø .91 .fJfJ 21. fJø 5Ø.fJØ 1.8ØØ 515.fJfJ 626.17 -.69 .47 .fJø 21. fJø 5fJ.fJØ * 1.8ØØ 725.fJØ 627.79 1.62 1.65 .fJø 21.8Ø 5Ø.fJØ Ie 2.5ØØ 565.fJØ 626.68 .fJø -.18 .fJø 2Ø.14 7e.fJø * 2.5ØØ 485.fJØ 625.95 -.73 -.22 .fJø 18.68 7fJ.ØØ I 2.5ØØ 685.8Ø 627.71 1.75 -.fJ8 .fJø 22.2Ø 7Ø.8Ø 4.fJØØ 565.fJØ 627.44 .fJø .76 .fJø 21.26 1SØ.fJØ 4.ØØØ 485.8Ø 627.13 -.31 1.18 .fJø 28.65 15Ø.8Ø I 4.fJØØ 685.fJfJ 628. 13 1 . fJfJ .43 .fJø 22.65 15Ø.8Ø 7.fJØØ 565.fJØ 628. 12 .fJfJ .68 .fJfJ 21.44 3fJØ.88 I 7.8ØØ 485.8Ø 627.76 -.36 .62 .8Ø 2Ø.72 3ØØ.fJØ 7.fJØØ 685.8Ø 628.72 .96 .58 .fJø 22.63 3ØØ.8Ø I 1Ø.9ØØ S5Ø.fJØ 628.92 .fJ8 .8Ø .88 2Ø.98 39Ø.fJ8 18.9ØØ 488.8Ø 628.54 -.38 .78 .fJ8 2Ø.24 398.8Ø 1Ø.9ØØ 7fJfJ.fJfJ 629.45 .91 .74 .8Ø 22.85 39Ø.8Ø I * 11.fJØØ 558.88 634.39 .88 5.47 .8fJ 27 . 16 1fJ.8fJ * 11.ØØØ 48fJ.8Ø 634. 17 -.22 5.63 .fJfJ 26.73 18.ØØ * 11.fJØØ 7fJØ.8Ø 634.81 .64 5.36 .8Ø 28.8fJ 18.8Ø I * 11.8SfJ 55Ø.fJfJ 635.63 .fJfJ 1.25 .fJ8 146.8fJ 5.8Ø * 11.858 48Ø.8Ø 635.56 -.fJ8 1.38 .fJ8 138.67 5.8Ø 11 . fJ5Ø 7fJØ.fJØ 636.1fJ .54 1.29 .S8 191.91 5.8Ø I 15.fJØfJ 55Ø.ØØ 64Ø.fJ7 .fJø 4.44 .fJø 89.52 395.ØØ 15.fJØØ 48Ø.fJfJ 639.94 -.13 4.39 .fJfJ 79. 15 395.8Ø Ie 15.ØØØ 7ØØ.ØØ 64Ø.Ø1 .fJ7 3.91 .fJfJ 81.98 395.8Ø I 10/02/86 Ø9:26:53 PAGE 9 SECNO Q CWSEL DIFWSP DIFWSX DIFKWS TOPWID XLCH I 16.7ØØ 558.8Ø 641.51 .fJ8 1.43 .fJø ~ 72.62 178.8Ø 16.7ØØ 48Ø.ØØ 641.38 -.13 , .44 .fJø 7Ø.72 178.8Ø I 16.78Ø 78fJ.fJfJ 641 . 94 .55 1.92 .fJ8 79.88 178.8Ø 1Ø/02/86 Ø9:26:53 PAGE 1Ø I I SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTES I CAUTION SECNO= 1 . fJøø PROFILE= 1 CRITICAL DEPTH ASSUMED CAUTION SECNO= 1.ØØØ PROFILE- 1 PROBABLE MINIMUM SPECIFIC ENERGV CAUTI~ SECNO= 1 .8ØØ PROFILE- 1 28 TRIALS ATTEMPTED TO BALANCE WSEL I CAUTION SECNO= 1.fJØØ PROFILE- 2 CRITICAL DEPTH ASSUMED Ie 7 I I CAUTI~ SECNO-= 1.8eø PROFILE- 2 PROBABLE MINIMUM SPECIFIC ENERGY CAUTI~ SECNO-= 1.eøø PROFILE- 2 28 TRIALS ATTEMPTED TO BALANCE WSEL Ie CAUTION SECNO= 1.eøø PROFILE- 3 CRITICAL DEPTH ASSUMED CAUTION SECNO- 1.8ØØ PROFILE- 3 PROBABLE MINIMUM SPECIFIC ENERGY CAUTION SECNO-= 1 . eøø PROFILE- 3 28 TRIALS ATTEMPTED TO BALANCE WSEL I CAUTION SECNO- 1.8Ø0 PROFILE- 3 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S. CAUTION SECNO= 2.58Ø PROFILE: 2 CRITICAL DEPTH ASSUMED I CAUTION SECNO= 2.5e0 PROFILE- 2 MINIMUM SPECIFIC ENERGY CAUTION SECNO= 11 . fJøø PROFILE-= 1 CRITICAL DEPTH ASSUMED CAUTION SECNO= 11.80Ø PROFILE- 1 PROBABLE MINIMUM SPECIFIC ENERGY I CAUTION SECNO= 11.fJØØ PROFILE= 1 28 TRIALS ATTEMPTED TO BALANCE WSEL CAUTION SECNO= 11.fJ00 PROFILED 2 CRITICAL DEPTH ASSUMED CAUTION SECNO= 11.800 PROFILED 2 PROBABLE MINIMUM SPECIFIC ENERGY I CAUTION SECNO= 11.800 PROFILE= 2 28 TRIALS ATTEMPTED TO BALANCE WSEL CAUTION SECNO= 11.8Ø8 PROFILED 3 CRITICAL DEPTH ASSlJ1ED CAUTION SECNO= 11.8"0 PROFILE= 3 PROBABLE MINIMUM SPECIFIC ENERGY I CAUTION SECNO= 11.8ØØ PROFILE- 3 28 TRIALS ATTEMPTED TO BALANCE WSEL CAUTION SECNO= 11.Ø5Ø PROFILED 1 CRITICAL DEPTH ASSUMED CAUTION SECNO= 11.850 PROFILE= 1 PROBABLE MINIMUM SPECIFIC ENERGY I CAUTION SECNO= 11.05Ø PROFILE= 1 28 TRIALS ATTEMPTED TO BALANCE WSEL CAUTION SECNO= 11.85Ø PROFIlEII: 2 CRITICAL DEPTH ASSUMED CAUTION SECNO= 11.85Ø PROFILE= 2 PROBABLE MINIMUM SPECIFIC ENERGV I CAUTION SECNO= 11.Ø50 PROFILE= 2 28 TRIALS ATTEMPTED TO BALANCE WSEL 1Ø/02/86 89:28:83 Ie I ************************************************** I HEC2 RELEASE DATED NOV 76 UPDATED MAY 1984 ERROR CORR - Ø1.Ø2.83.84.85.86 MODIFICATION - 58.51.52.53.54.55.56 IBM-PC-XT VERSION I ************************************************** I I I I Ie 8 I PAGE THIS RUN EXECUTED 1Ø/02/86 89:28:Ø4 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 636 634 I L E U A T I o " 632 639 628 626 624 622 h S9t1 I L I U A T I o N 636 l···· 634 i····· ::: l·::· 628 -;..... I 626 J..... i 624 . , . . . 622 , aøe E L E U It T I o H 626 624 ~ 622 I SOÐ CN>ss-Section 1 ......"".. : ", : ...~~....~..... ; ....., ~ .....~... ~~~ .. . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . -' : /" : :./ : . r' . . . . : . . . . . : . . . '../>' : . . , . . ~ L--,-'~- ~ · ~. . .. wi- . .. ... j;-/' ¡.... . ¡..... -~"" : : ~--': : · . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. · . . · . . · . . â ~ ~ ¡ · . . · . . 1 CFoss-Section 1.3 22ge 2400 26ß9 2899 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. · . . · . . · . . · . . ....................... · . . · . . , . . · . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. · . . · . . · . . · . . :.'.:, A , ~ / ~..... :/ "10 . . . ~. . . . . . =. . . . . __"~:".'~ . . . . .. . > ~.< .. . ¡ .. .. . ! . : :",."'" : ~à 1009 1299 1490 1690 18ge 29ge 2200 2499 26. f 2899 STATION (feet) c~os5-Section 2.5 ~¡ ; .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. , . . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. 636 l····· ~ . . . . . 634 i....··..·.. 632 .J..... k: . . . . ( ~ ~~\ 639 ~.....:.. \ . . . , : .~. : 628 . . . . . ! . . . . . i \,~< i >, . . ! . . _~~.r"<~' . ¡ . . . . . .. i .. . ¡ .. .. .r . ì /r-~... ¡ . .. . ¡ :ð .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 19ØC 1290 14Q0 1699 18Ø0 29~e 2Z0ß 249ø 269Ø 2890 STATION (feet) 6 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 6361" . . . : . . . . . : . . . . . 634 1'" k . . . ¡ . . . . 1 :.,: 632 1····· ¡ . . ~"\.':<'<. . . ~ . . . . . 630 1····· j . . . . . i . . . \.< . . . . . 628 j........... ¡ . . . . . r>\ · 6~f. I : : : L ~~ 1···· '1' . . . '1' . . . . ¡ . . . . 624 1···· 'j' . . . 'j' . . . '1' . . . . 622' ~ ; ; soe laøa 1290 1499 1690 18~e 2@98 22~0 2409 2600 2890 STATIOt'i (teet) E L E U A T I o Ii E L E U A T I o N 648 1····· ¡ . . . . . f . . . . . 644 i·····:····· : . . . . . 649 J..... f . . . . . ~ . , . . . ~ : " 63£' : : v l·····~...¡",,····:'.... 632 J..... ¡ . ~-t'>- J . . . 628 ~..... ¡ . . . . . ¡ . . . . . ¡ . ¡ : : : 1; ~ f ~ 624 . . . . 'j' . . . '1' . . . ./. 629. ~ ~ ~ SQe 1990 129Ø 1492 652 648 E 644 L [ U 649 A T i·· . I 636 0 N l···· 632 628 , ~, ..,. ~ 624 ; 90S Cross-Section 4 .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. · . · . · . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '"'' .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. · I . . . >1 : ~ ~ if . . . . . : . . , . , f . . . . . ~ . ¡ /¡ ~ ¡ ¡ . . . . ~ . . . . . ~ /:: . . . ! . . . . . ~ . . . . . ~ . . . . . ~ ~ . _.~. : ~ ~ ~ : .,.....; . : : : . . . . J,¡/. . . i . . . . . i . . . . . ¡ . . . . . ! . . . . . j - /.. ~ ~. . " . ,.J""", . . ~ . . . . . 1 . . . . . : . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . '" ¡ . ./~~. (~~~ .1~~? I. . . . . . . . . . . . â~ : ; ~ C!\oss-Section 7 """ ... ........... ..... ..... ..... ....... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ".. ".. .. ".. ".. .. ... ".. .. ".. ".. .. ".. ".. .. ".. ".. · "" ".. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... ........ ....... ......... ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ". ".. .. "" .... .. ". ".. .. ".. ".. .. ".. ".. .. ".. ".. .. ".. ".. .. ".. .. · . .. . ............ .... .................... .. . . . . . .. . .. .. . .. .. . . . .. . · ... . '. . '. . '. . " . '. . '. . . . . . . f . . ..~J . f . . . . . ~ . . , . . ~ . . , , . ~ ' . . . . f ~ /' . ~ 16~ 18~Ø 29~9 22~J 24~ 26~ 280Q STATION (teet) c~o5s-Sectíon 10.9 . . .. .. ....... ..... .. .. t . . ---~ . . . . . : r-_.....~...:....:._ , ~ --~ .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... '" ... ....... . .. . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. . .. ....... ....... 130~ 14øe 15ØØ 16 e 17eø 180e 19.e STATION (teet) 6 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I C~ss-Section 11 E L E U A I I o H 644l'" . 642 ~..... -f 649 JI.. . . . ~'\ ~ ': . . . . . : .. '. : / ~., ~ ~ ~ . 6 38 I"" 0 . ¡ 0 " . "'-l.. . . 0 ¡ . . " . . ¡ . 0 . . . « 1· " . . . i . 0 . . . ¡ 0 . . . . ¡ . . . . . ¡ 1 ~ ~ ---,. ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ . ~ 636 i ~ I . " . : 0 0 0 0 . i . . . . 0 ~ . . . . . : . . . 0 0 ! 634 i 0 : : . : i 0 0 0 : : ! : " 0 0 : . : ~'~~~. l.."! 0 . 0 . . ! . . 0 . . ; . . . . . ¡ . 0 " . " 0 632 f" 0 % 0 0 0 0/, . 0 . % 0 " . . ¡ . . 0 " . ¡ 0.. 0/, . . . . ¡ . 0 0 0 01' . " . -¡ . " . . 0/ 6309~ l~e 11~ lZ~9 13~e l~Ø 15~ß 16~ 17~ 18~ 19~ STATION (teet) .. . .. .. . .. " .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. " .. .. " ... .. .. ... .. .. .. .. . ... .. .. . " .. .. .. .. · . . .. . " .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. · . . · , . · . . · . . E L I U A T I o N C~oS5-Section 11.85 644 1'"' 0 0 ¡ 0 0 0 0 0 ¡ 0 0 " 0 0 ¡ " 0 " 0 "I' 0 0 0 "10 " 0 0 0 ¡ 0 0 0 " ¡ " 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 0 ¡ 1 . . . . -- . or . . . . . ::: 10 o' 0 0 0 ¡ : : : 0 : ¡ : 0 : : 0 ¡ 0 : : : : . 0 : 0 ~~y 0 : 0 : ¡ : 0 0 : : ¡ 0 0 0 : 0 ¡ : 0 : : : ¡ : 0 0 0 : ! 999 1~ 11~ 12~9 13~ 14~0 15~0 16~0 17t.ø 18~ 19~ STATION (leet) . . [ L E U A T I o " Cross-Section 15.90 ;:: J:: 0 : 0'0 : : : : /0 0 : : : I : : 0 0 0, : 0 0 0 : '0 0 : : % " : : : 1 j ~ ¡ ¡ i ¡ 656 l" 0 . 0 : 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 010 0 . 0 "/0 . 0 " " ¡ " 0 0 " 0 i " " 0 0 " 652 -............................ ............ 64R i!\ ¡ ! : i ), "~ l' o"..!\. 00 ¡.." o. ¡ 0.".. ¡....":."" I.""" 0 644 J"... . ! 0 0\" 0 ¡ . " . . " [ 0 . . 0 . ¡ . . . . . ! . ". /" : . . 0 " . t . ,. . . . I . ~ f-.··,__ ~ .) : j ~ 6 40 ~".." "'" " " " 0 ! 0 0 "-~~ìJ/ ¡ 0 0 " 0 " ¡ . 0 " 0 0 0 " " " " . 636 . 899 19Qe 1290 149ß 160Ø 180e 2ØØØ 2290 2490 26~ 28 ø STATION (teet) ~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT * I (' 0 -.J -l ~ '-' w J' (j) LL LL I z 0 . t- eL ....... 0... Ie (f) 0 (í) 0 x Ct: x ~ ..-. w a.. w (L V) ~1 ~ ~ r:' ~. ~ . . I : ; J".:' 0 ~ 1L. 0 0 0 a::: N I ~ CL ~ w I u « 1L. 0 I ~ a::: 0 ::> Lf) ~ ~ (f) I a::: u w ~ f- -+-' ~ '+- I « '---" ~ S i' 0 Y'· 0 ~ 0 z W I 0 Ie \.~ ! r- . C) ~ \~ . ¡ f- a::: I ~ \ . . I « . I ... I I I 6 I (f) u I ' (f) CI) I ,. I ~ I - t- I 0 <{ ~ 0 H I \:.1 0 :E W H ¡ ¡ : Lf) -J I a::: I w t- ! f- I f- u i W I ¡ ~ <{ ~ I , I (f) 0 'i ¿ a:: I c.. I " I ~ f- 3NVl 'Y1S^~~ a3S0dO~d . 1 I. -1 i I ::> I I ~ ct: - - -¡ - - - - - - - r - - - - ~ >- I 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ¡ I ~ Ie ~ N I' N '" N I"- ~ n n N N ~ <.0 (() to lO to <D O^~N (~J) NOIIV^3l3 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: eUbject: - Council Meeting Date: Request of George Moore for Replat of Lots 14-2RA and 14-2Ktl, Block 7, Oak Hills Additiun 11/10/86 PS 86-45 Agenda Number: This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 14-2RA and 14-2RB, Block 7, Oak Hills Addition. The property is located on the north side of Meandering Way west of Precinct Line Road. The purpose for the proposed plat is to re-define the two lots on which a duplex structure is under construction. The property is zoned R-4SD Duplex. The applicants are constructing a duplex for sale. In the set-up for construction of the slab it was discovered that the foundation was positioned such that the dividing wall between the two units did not center upon the interior lot line as required. The applicants were given the option of re-setting the foundation to correct the location or revising the lot dimensions to fit the lot to the structure. They chose to revise the lot dimensions. The proposed lots are in compliance with the minimum requirements of the District. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Replat Application PS 86-45 on Lots 14-R2A and 14-2RB, Block 7, Oak Hills Addition as submitted. ~ Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable K 1il /~ ent Head Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of AG II ~ I ! ~ ¡ I ø' #-- /" 3.:,',!I'~· V' ~¡iN.li: ¡¡:I,I I R-e ~.. ~:/./:;: \~'LJHt:: ~~~. _ t , ,~ . ~ '\.\,~ ~c I ~. ¡. : I J 2 61 . // ~ ... t. \, _! í r ¡ . '1Tb\J' ! .' .' ¡ I ¡ R - 5 - D ~...J '/;/ \/ì 'trWAL :~r '-:7:i --;;;::--r _ i¡II,1 A!: !!il!!I!"!!i! \ ¿/f-' AG-df-!_~__ y~~~-JJ~~';~ 15 ' 1-2 ^/'..,~~ '.\ . .. '-I L· ~~~~~~~~ ~ 1260 \ -:....~ 1 *( .."\..... J I.. "'~"'i1'1'": T --r ( J 4. ;.¡...1I85 ç ~ /F// ':'~~ I <- \ ~"'''':bA:~· '1JrnT iii . I II _ ~ ~ I I ¡. ¡ '., I : J; ! I .' 1" I v' 4£. . ~ "'I LJ i r-- " 1 '¡ I 1- " I Ii. 11 R-7-M F '.:-.1(1 I~.>~. ~ /i .' À I ¡till;·,! I!q~/tðilr~+:=~=~[~: ~t~ ·~·i'! {', ! \ '1 ' J." I ~\~ ø:" . R-2 ~...- o-'~( · - :::~.~= =, ~ -i---i . R-2 ::-2 . //. L 1 II I I I li- ':i:~:-':- - -'r- - ~¿' 1344 ~ ~ /// ,~/~tA~": $. -. , , I" Ii' -;--f"~- f../' . AG '" ,/; r ~. ~, ~C , ' ~Yv:.i.w ]¡"""!!t.,(, .,~ "" '1 A"G . " 21 ~~-{ ,:'J - _ - t::~OIQC' ,~ I I _ ! bl~ \ ~-- . /" ! I ' I 1 0 . S"'''HFI[LD -2 ~ 'J1. 1 rï _ ~.. -+-.,c~_ . /' ~ ~ ~'f~ ! f :UNIO" HIG.. SCHOOL ~~ ;::: ~5- ;- i = ~ ~. :fJ!' -~EJ: .. -:;.- _II I" ==F1~)-t: ~.. . ~~~~~ = "R-22 I ~t-4- = I _. --,~ r- ,. \ /'I' ~ - I ,. -~ -- '"' C-2 ~-~--o -c:;r -~; --r--ír-- ! 1_., CI 'e" '1:" - ....'" t:. f--~~. . )-~.., I '-- I -f. .; ~ ~. ~':j I~L~ t ~' '/ ,-.. ' R-2 . t:~'" ~. I ~-L.,--Ll,J R - -~~ T . . --- " --Rr--- l' -, ~~ ~ ~ . I ". ~ ~ R-I tt. "I r--, ~ I , . r< --- _. "- I ,----t-j -:-~ !---ï I, ..L ~.,..,' . . ~; /:J' I-I 3R C-I AG ¡AGk: fP. I: ! , ~ ··,U ':~ / l I , I / I " I ' \ \, , , , , " " \ \ \~ \ ,F. f? R-2 1343 AG ; .: J 1 ------~ . ~r" , -----~-- .' :. ~_. 1 /~, E3 /' § II :=Jf I ì ¡ ~ On""' /~ .' l ~ h~ --:;-m - - <..' L . ~ ..1- b - ¡ - 1 = L:r-"- """.,..-,:)--~y. .~~ r- _II ...L'-P-=-»~.~~)'?".. J.~ I;W¡;-'~~~,'~~ ~:/ R-7-MF II ~ R-3 ..... 1090 I-I SU ; - ~ / // ~/ // ~ R-3 '--'~I -. · ¡ I Ie I I I I Page 2 P & Z Minutes October 23, 1986 ( ( 2. PS 86-37 Request of Walker Real Estate & Investment, Inc. for preliminary of Lot 5, Block 1, Henry Additi PS 86-37 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion PS 86-37. This motio as seconded by Mr. Schwinger and motion carried 5-0. I I I -- 3. PS 86-39 o ill Fenimore, Wayne Wright Charles Wright, & J.V. Frank for eplat of Lot 20-R, Block 4, amond Loch Addition. PS 86-39 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 86-39. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. 4. Request of Burk Collins Investments for final plat of Stonybrooke South Addition. I I I I I I I I" I Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 86-44. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. 5. PS 86-45 Request of George Moore for replat of Lots 14-R2A & 14-R2B, Block 7, Oak Hills Addition. Chairman Bowen said since this is a replat in duplex zoning there must be a Public Hearing. He opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak in favor of this request, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. · . I Ie I I I I I I I '. I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 p & Z Minutes October 23, 1986 PS 86-45 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT ( ( Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 86-45. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:40 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I I 530 BEDFORD RD., SUITE 150 · e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I P.R. ENGINEERING. IN( ( BEDFORD, TEXAS 76022 · 817-268-5111 October 13, 1986 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 RE: 3-958, City of North Richland Hills Oak Hills Addition Lots 14-R2A & 14=R2B Block 7, Replat PS 86-45 Gentlemen: /" We have received the City Engineer's comments and the following corrections have been made: 1. The existing noted on the In the first description, The owner of Moore. In the eighth paragraph of the metes and bounds, the correction has been made. We have placed the owner's name arid his phone number and the surveyor's name and phone number on the plat. 6. There is no easement recorded, according to the plat, Volume 388-183, Page 94, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, running parallel with the most northern property line, although, there is a 5' building line which has been noted on the plat. zoning of this development area has been replat. paragraph of the metes and bounds it has been corrected. the Lots 14-R2A & 14-R2B is Mr. George 2. 3. 4. 5. If you have any questions concerning this project, please feel free to call me at 268-5111. tI~~çJ4ç- /kp DON S. PEEBLES, P.E. President I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I II I I I- I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas October 2, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-958, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS OAK HILLS ADDITION, L. 14-R2A & 14-R2B, B.7, REPLA T , PS 86 - 45, GRID MAP 63 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat. 2 In the first paragraph of the metes and bounds description, the replat is of Lot 14-RA and 14-RB rather than of Lot 14-R2 and Lot 14-R2B. In addition, according to the Tarrant Appraisal District Maps and previous reviews of the Oak Hills Addition, this replat is a part of David Moses Survey Abstract No. 1150 rather than the T.K. Martin Survey Abstract No. 1055. 3 If this Lot is owned by more than one owner, the consent of all owners should be obtained and so certified on the replat. 4 In the eighth paragraph of the metes and bounds description, the subdivision should be designated as Lot 14-R2A rather than Lot 14-R2. 5 In accordance with the subdivision ordinance requirements, the phone numbers of the owner and surveyor and the address of the surveyor should be shown on the plat. Also, both the owner1s acknowledgement and dedications and surveyor1s certificate should be signed and sealed. 6 The easement running parallel with the most northern property line of these proposed lots should be noted with the type of easement, and its volume and page number on the plat. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SU ITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/26 7-336 7 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I- I ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued OAK HILLS ADDITION 7 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~NW,~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RvJA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development October 2, 1986 PS 86 - 45 PAGE 2 ... r CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 11/10/86 r~.. Department: _ Council Meeting Date: ~ubject: Proposed Revisions to the Sign Ordinance Governing A SO 86-15 Real Estate Directional Signs genda Number: Ordinance No. 1418 At the direction of the City Council, the Staff has prepared a draft revision to Section 6.2(e) of the Ordinance regarding the placement of Real Estate Directional or "Bandit signs". The current Ordinance limits each builder to a total of six (6) individual signs off-site per project which are to be displayed only during daylight hours. These signs were to be placed on private property only and were not allowed on City street right of way. The Staff, in administering this Ordinance normally would confiscate any signs which were placed on the right of way as being a hazard to traffic. The proposed revision to the Ordinance would establish a sign policy for "Bandit Signs" which would allow them to be placed on' the parkway of the street within specified paràmeters. This allowance for placing the signs would be in effect only on the weekend and holidays. An individual builder would be allowed to place an unlimited number of signs with no two signs closer than 200 feet apart. All signs placed under this proposed revision would not be allowed to interfere with traffic control or motorist sight distances at either an intersection or driveway. RECOMMENDATION: is recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1418 revising the provisions the Ordinance covering real estate directional signs. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of t I Ie I I I I I I I 18 I I I I I I L,_ -.,; ORDINANCE NO. 1418 , ~ BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Rich1and Hills, Texas that Ordinance No. 1001, adopted January 24, 1983, Sign Ordinance Code for the City of North Richland Hills, be amended so that the following amendments to the said Sign Ordinance be and they are hereby made as follows: SECTION 6.2(e): POLICY FOR WEEKEND BUILDERS ADVERTISING The City of North Richland Hills' Policy for Weekend Builders Advertising, as expressed in this notice, is extended to Home Builders for the purpose of guiding the weekend motoring public to available residential properties. The policy is intended as a benefit also to the buying public. These provisions are designed to allow temporary directional signs without resulting in an excess that may prove offensive to others of the public. The policy should serve also as "common sense" guidelines in places where direct application is unclear. 1. Schedule: Signs will be allowed between 5 PM Friday and 8 AM Monday. A holiday falling on Friday or Monday will be considered part of the weekend. 2. Sign Size: "Signs shall not exceed 24" X 24" in size,-nor be installed more than three (3) feet above grade. 3. Spacing of Signs: A minimum of 30 feet must be held between all signs, and signs for anyone advertiser must be at least 200 feet apart. 4. Sign Locations: a. Not closer than 40 feet to a street intersection or median opening and no closer than:,ib feet to any private driveway. b. Not closer than three (3) feet from the edge of the sign to the street curb (or edge of Pavement). Signs should not encroach either the sidewalks or the street. c. Not in a motorist "visibility triangle". Generally, if a sign is close to blocking motorist visibility, it should be moved (see "a" above). d. Not more than three (3) miles from the subject property. 5. Signs should be rigid, two (2) dimensional displays that advertise new residential property, "for sale" only (not lease property), guiding the motorist to a specific location. ~ ~~~:._~~.~:~.'".. 'l¡j·-,:~:·~.~,--:-:~~·i~,:~:t "~·:t~r. 'c'......' "..- "¡~::"-~."'~ ~ ,"" -:.i~~¥7'f" I Ie I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I Ordinance No.1418 These are the guidelines under which this policy will be administered, relating particularly to the weekend/motoring/home-buying customer. It is the responsibility of the builder to secure permission of the adjacent property owner for placement of the signs on prtvate property. This policy does not grant unlimited access and use of the City right-of-way. Violations of this policy will be cause for confiscating the signs, and excessive violations may require that the policy be ~uspended for a period of time. The Building Official shall notify the City Council in the event that suspension of this policy is put into effect indicating the causes and the period of the suspension. All builders are offered the use of this policy equally. In so doing, we ask that you help us maintain a neat and orderly appearance throughout all of North Richland Hills. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas this day of , 1986. APPROVED: Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City '> . 'y:-, ~;.i'. ''''I--:..~_ . i..... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Parks and Recreation Department Council Meeting Date: 11-10':"86 Support for Certification of all Coaches in Youth Sports e>ubject: Program-ResolutIon No. 86-39 and Implementation ProcedureSAgendaNumber: GN 86-101 I The Parks and Recreation Board met in open session October 22, 1986 with representatives of the Richland Youth Association (RYA), North RIchland Girls Softball Association (NRGSA), National Youth Sports Coaches AssociatIon (NYSCA) and CIty Council in attendance. At that meetIng, the Board voted to adopt the following guIdelines for Implementation of the NYSCA program. 1. Fees - The City of the North RIchland HIlls will pay for al) coaches to attend the N.Y.S.C.A. certification program for one year beginning January 1, 1987. At the end of one year the program wi)) be reviewed. It is recommended that the youth groups adopt the required certification of coaches into their association by-Jaws. 2. Grievances - All grievances concerning coaches are to be brought before the grievance committee of that youth organization concerned. The findings are to be brought before the Parks and Recreation Board at the next scheduled meeting for review and documentation. If that same grievance or a series of other grievances is brought before the Parks and Recreation Board concerning the same coach, then after investigation by staff a recommendation will be forwarded to the N.Y.S.C.A. 3. Implementation - The program wIll be made available to the youth groups one week prior to the start of season practices for that specific sport and again two weeks after the starting date of that season. If additional coaches are needed for extra teams or due to loss of coaches, additional clInIcs will be held on tImes and dates that are mutually suitable for the youth associations and.certified clinicians provided by the Parks and RecreatIon Department. 4. Certification - All coaches are to be certified for the sport in which they coach. In the event one of the coaches cannot be present a certified coach can request a "temporary helper". The certified coach is responsible for the actions of the helper. , Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget t:~:~~ Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature /2/)1/~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The best estimate of numbe~s have been ~eceived f~om the youth g~oups and it is estimated that $3,750.00 (250 coaches f~om both o~ganizations at $15.00 each) will be needed fo~ implementation of the Board/s proposal. (See attached cover sheet.> RECOMMENDATION It is the ~ecommendation of the Pa~ks and Rec~eation Staff and the Pa~ks and Rec~eation Boa~d that the City Council app~ove attached ~esolution ~equì~ing NYSCA ce~tlfication and program implementatIon guIdelines effective January 1, 1987. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I' I. I I I I I I I It I I I I I I I , I ~I STATE OF TEXAS RESOLUTION REQUIRING COUNTY OF TARRANT CERTIFICATION OF ALL COACHES CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IN YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAMS RESOLUTION NO. 86-39 WHEREAS, the Mayor and of City Council of the City of North Richland Hills recognize the need for qua1ity youth sports programs; and WHEREAS The Nationa1 Youth Sports Coaches Association has developed a certification program for youth sports coaches whereby the coaches are schooled in psychology of coaching youth sports, maximizing performance, injury prevention, and first aid; and WHEREAS, The National Youth Sports Coaches Association program should be applied to our present athletic programs to help improve coach/parent relationships, to educate our volunteer coaches so they have a better understanding of organization, teaching proper techniques, safety, and to bring them up to a more knowledgeable 1 eve I in the psychological and physical needs of deal ing with young athletes, and to ensure al 1 children obtain a wholesome experience in youth sports; and WHEREAS, through this certification program, the quality of youth sports in the City of North Richland Hil1s will be improved to the benefit of all persons involved. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Counci1 in meeting du1y assembled and by the authority thereof that al1 coaches of youth sports programS operating within the structure of the North Rich1and Hi11s Parks and Recreation Department and/or uSing City faci1ities sha11 be required to be certified through the National Youth Sports Coaches Association Certification Program commencing January 1, 1987. PASSED AND APROVED THIS day of , 1986 Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND lEGALITIES Rex McEntire, City Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Department: 11-10-86 Council Meeting Date: GN 86-120 Agenda Number: ubject: Revised Plan for Library/Recreation Renovation On June 3, 1986 the City Staff presented the Council with alternate funding sources for the proposed Library/Recreation Center renovation. The sources included anticipated budget savings based on actual revenues to May 31, 1986 and projections for the remainder of the year, for a total of $600,000 in the General Fund. A summary of the funding sources presented on June 3rd are listed as follows: 1. Available Library/Recreation Center Bond Funds $ 734,380 2. Parks & Recreation Funds Transferred 1/13/86 153,257 3. Park & Library Fund (Donations from Utility Customers) 30,000 4. Anticipated Budget Savings 600,000 5. Unspecified CIP Building Funds 115,286 6. Anticipated Interest Income 8,500 Total Funding $1,641,423 The budget savings anticipated in June 1986 were based on actual revenues and expenditures as of May 31, 1986 and projected financial results to September 30, 1986. Those projections have not materialized as anticipated. Licenses and permits, our fourth largest revenue source, was projected to be $899,500. The actual unaudited revenue was only $749,100 - a shortfall of $150,400. Interest Income was projected to be $272,600. The actual revenue was only $135,489 - a shortfall of $137,111. A summary of 1985/86 overall savings is listed as follows: Budgeted Revenues 1985/86. $8,855,286 Actual Revenues (Unaudited) 8,738,684 Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues $ (116,602) $8,905,532 Budgeted Expenditures 1985/86 Actual Expenditures (Unaudited) 8,579,458 Expenditure Savings $ 326,073 $ 209,471 Overall Savings Finance Review Acct. Number Library/Recreation Facilities .SUffÄundS Avai lable . Fonance Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget General CIP Othe~ /;) _ ~ /f)s-~~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM -- Page 1 of I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The original appropriation for the Library/Recreation facilities was $1,641,423 (as stated on page one). That estimate proved to be overstated by $262,627 based on the contract that was awarded October 13, 1986. A summary of the revised contract and move-in cost requirements is itemized below. Original Budget June 1, 1986 Revised Budget Based on Bids 1. Library/Recreation Center Renovation Base Bid N/A N/A $ 986,000 25,200 A. Alternate Al B. Alternate A2 N/A 10,500 Total Construction Contract $1,264,344 $1,021,700 2. Architects/Engineering 135,269 115,286 3. Move-in Cost-Recreation Center 29,570 29,570 4. Move-in Cost-Library 212,240 212,240 Total $1,641,423 $1,378,796 Alternate Funding In view of the lower 1985/86 budget savings and the lesser amounts needed to fund the construction and move-in costs, the following revision to the funding plan are recommended: 1. Previous approved funding $1,641,423 2. Correction to proposed budget savings (400,000) 3. Interest Income in General ClP other than 1985, 1986 Series G.O. Bond Projects 137,373 Total Proposed Funding $1,378,796 New controls have been implemented by the City Manager's Office to monitor all expenditures and revenues on a monthly basis for budget year 1986/87. A forecasting model was developed that will take cumulative actual revenues to date, plus forecasted amounts to year-end based on an average two year cumulative curve. The forecasting model will be run monthly with control dates established. The control dates are January 1, April 1, and June 1. In view of the 1985/86 revenue shortfall, the City Manager will redouble his commitment to authorize expenditures for new capital outlays and new personnel only if the projected revenues are within the scope as approved by the City Council. Recommendation: It is recommended that the budget be reduced as outlined above, that interest earnings committed to the project be increased, and the reduction of the budget savings as outlined above. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police Council Meeting Date: 11-10-86 New Animal Control Ordinance .~ Ordinance 111412 Agenda Number: GN 86-121 Ordinance 1024 dealing with Animal Control requires revision to coincide with the opening of the new Animal Control Shelter in November. The changes included in Ordinance #1412 include: The title "Captain of Uniform Patrol"· has been changed to read "Animal Control Supervisor". This is necessary as a result of the , organizational changes establishing Animal Control as a separate Division reporting directly to the Chief of Police. Article III, Section 7 Fees: A quarantine fee of $6.00/day has been added to cover the cost of quarantining animals in the new Shelter. This procedure requires special.attent- ion and involves more time and effort on the part of Animal Control personnel to ensure compliance with State statutes on Rabies Observation. Section 8 Adoption: This Section is needed to allow for the adoption of animals from the new facility. It requires that all dogs and cats adopted from the Shelter shall be altered surgically to prevent their adding to the already over grown pet population that results in millions of unwanted dogs and cats being euthanized each year. This Section will allow us to draw up a binding cont- ract that will be notarized to protect this agency legally. Article IV, Section 4 Multiple Ownership: Section E has been added to allow us to revoke the Multi-Pet Permit, where the permit holder allows the animals to run loose. We have en- countered this problem several times and feel that this will enhance the enforcement of the Ordinance while still allowing people to keep multiple pets so long as they do not become a problem to others.. Article V, Section 5 Fees:The fee for impoundment of livestock has been increased from $20.00 to $50.00 to cover the cost of picking up livestock and transporting them to the Shelter. The daily board fee has also been increased to cover the cost of maintaining, feeding and caring for these larger animals. Article VI, Section 1 Vaccinations: This has been changed to comply with State Law re- quiring a rabies vaccination at four (4) months of age and again at twelve (12) month inter- vals. Section 9 Vicious Animals: This Section has been changed to allow for the removal of a vicious animal that kills or maims another animal. Previously, the victim animal had to be killed to enable us to enforce this Section. Section 10 Guard Dogs: This Section has been changed by adding a second paragraph enabling our Division to inspect the premises where a Guard Dog is to be kept for safety pur~~se~. We have had several instances where a Guard Dog has escaped from a fence that was not of sufficient strength or height to con- tain it safely. Section 14 Penalty for Violation: The figure $200.00 has been changed to $1,000.00 to comply with the Municipal Court fine structure. We recommend replacing Ordinance #1024 entirely with Ordinance #1412. The changes above are the principal changes we require. These changes will enable the Animal Control Divi- sion to operate more effectively and efficiently. It is desirable to have this new Ordi- nance in effect prior to the opening of our new Animal Shelter. Recommendations: It is recommended that Ordinance #1412 be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Op 'ng Budget o er Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM R 11/ ~~ City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of I I -e I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I i' I \,/ INDEX ARTICLE 1 ------------------------------------------------ Preamble ARTICLE 2 ------------------------------------------------ Definitions ARTICLE 3 ------------------------------------------------ Dogs and Cats ARTICLE 4 ------------------------------------------------ Kennels ARTICLE 5 ------------------------------------------------ Estrays ARTICLE 6 ------------------------------------------------ In General .. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I t' I ORDINANCE NO. 1412 Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of North Rich1and Hills, Texas, that: ARTICLE 1. PREAMBLE The animal control regulations as herein established have been made for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of North Richland Hills. The ordinance contains standards regulating the use, type, location, maintenance, registration, confinement, destruction and harboring of certain animals. The intent of the regulations, prohibitions, and provisions is -to protect values within the City of North Richland Hills, to enhance the quality of life of persons, pets, and other animals and to protect the general public from damage and injury which may be caused by unregulated animals. ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS When used in this ordinance the following words and terms, unless the context indicates a different meaning, shall be interpreted as follows: SECTION 1. (A) OWNER: Any person who has right of property in an animal. (B) HARBORING: The act of keeping and caring for an animal or of providing a premise to which the animal returns for food, shelter, or care for a period of 10 days. (C) DOMESTIC ANIMAL: Shall include all species of animals commonly and universally accepted as being domesticated. (D) WILD ANIMAL: Shall include all species of animals which exist in a natural unconfined 'state and are usually not ~omesticated. (E) PET ANIMALS: Shall include dogs, cats, rabbits, rodents, birds, reptiles, and any other species of animal which is sold or retained as a household pet but shall not include skunks, non-human primates, and any other species of wild, exotic, or carnivorous animal that may be further restricted in this ordinance. (F) STRAY ANIMAL: (Including Estrays) Any animal, for which there is no identifiable owner or harborer, which is found to be at large within the corporate limits of the City of North Rich1and Hills. (G) ESTRAY: Means any stray horse, stallion, mare, gelding, filly, colt, mule; jinny, jack, jennet, hog, sheep, goat, or any species of cattle. (H) VICIOUS ANIMAL: Any animal that constitutes a physical threat by reason of it's behavior to human beings or other animals. I Ie I I I (I) RUNNING AT LARGE: (1) Off Premises (a) Any dog which is not restrained by means of a leash or chain of sufficient strength and length to control the actions of such animal while off premises. (b) Any cat which is off the owner's property. I I I I II I I I I I I I t' I (2) On Premises - Any dog not confined by premises of owner by a substantial fence of sufficient strength and height to prevent the animal from escaping therefrom, or secured on the premises by a metal chain or leash sufficient in strength to prevent the animal from escaping from premises and so arranged that the animal will remain upon the premises when the leash is stretched to full length. A dog intruding upon the property of another person other than the owner shall be termed "at large". Any animal within an automobile or other vehicle of it's owner or owner's agent shall not be deemed "at large". (J) RABIES VACCINATION: Shall mean the vaccination of a dog, cat or other domestic animal with an anti-rabies vaccine approved by the State Department of Health and administered by a veterinarian licensed by the State. (K) QUARANTINE BY OWNER: (1) Animal must be inside an enclosed structure, i.e., house or garage and must remain there for ten (10) days. (2) If maintained outside, animal must be behind a fence from which it cannot escape and on a chain from which it cannot break loose or inside a covered pen or kennel from which it cannot escape. (3) Animal must be kept away from other animals and people excepting those in the immediate household. (4) Animal may not be removed from corporate city limits of North Richland Hills while under quarantine. ARTICLE 3. DOGS AND CATS SECTION 1. IMPOUNDMENT. Animals owned or harbored in violations of this ordinance or any other ordinance or law of the State of Texas shall be taken into custody by an animal control officer or other designated official and impounded under the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 2. DISPOSITION OF IMPOUNDED ANIMALS. If the owner of an animal is known, immediate notice shall be given to him. Any impounded animal may be redeemed upon payment of the impoundment fee, care and feeding charges, veterinary charges, rabies vaccination charges and such other costs as set by the animal control officer. If such animal in not redeemed within four (4) days aft~r notification of owner, where owner is known, it shall be deemed abandoned and may be placed for adoption, 2 I Ie I subject to payment of the impoundment fee, care and feeding charges, veterinary charges, rabies vaccination charges, and such other costs as set by the animal control officer, or the animal control officer may humanely euthanize said animal by injection or other means approved by the City Council. I II I I I I . I SECTION 3. DISPOSITION OF IMPOUNDED ANIMAL BEING HELD ON COMPLAINT. If a complaint has been filed in Municipal Court for the City of North Richland Hills against the owner of an impounded animal for a violation of this ordinance the animal shall not be released except on the order of the court which may also direct the owner to pay any penalties for violation of this ordinance in addition to all impounded fees. Surrender of an animal by the owner thereof to the animal control officer does not relieve or render the owner immune from the decision of the court, nor to the fees and fines which may result from a violation of this ordinance. SECTION 4. REMOVAL OF DOGS & CATS FROM CONFINEMENT. It shall be unlawful for any person to remove from any place of confinement any dog or cat which has been confined as authorized, without the consent of the impounding agency. SECTION 5. ANIMALS AT LARGE. It shall be unlawful for any person owning or harboring an animal to permit such animal to run at large. Any officer or citizen of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby authorized to take up and deliver to the office of the animal control officer any animal mentioned in this ordinance that may be found "at large" in the corporate limits of the City, subject to the applicable' provisions of the law. Failure to notify and/or turn over to the animal control officer any such animal within forty-eight (48) hours may subject the person taking up the animal to civil and/or criminal action. I I I I I I {' I The animal control officer or his agent and peace officers are authorized to impound any animal mentioned in this ordinance which is in violation of the ordinance. In the event the animal -is on private property or property of the animal's owner, the animal control officer, his agent, or peace officer may enter the property, other than a private dwelling for the purpose of impoundment or issuance of a citation, or both, subject to the applicable provisions of the law. SECTION 6. CONFINEMENT DURING ESTRUS. Any unspayed female dog or cat in the state of estrus (heat) shall be confined during such period of time in a house, building, or secure enclosure and said area of enclosure shall be so constructed that no other dog or cat may gain access to the confined animal. Owners who do not comply shall be ordered to remove the animal in heat to a boarding kennel, veterinary hospital, or animal shelter. All expenses incurred as a result of this confinement shall be paid by the owner. Failure to comply with the removal order of the animal cont~o~ officer shall be a violation of this ordinance and the dog or cat will then be impounded as prescribed in this ordinance. 3 I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I {' I SECTION 7. FEES. The following fees are established beginning with and the effective date of this ordinance. (A) IMPOUNDMENT OF NEUTERED ANIMAL First Impoundment---------------------$10.00 Second Impoundment--------------------$10.00 Third Impoundment---------------------$20.00 Boarding Fee--------------------------$ 4.00 per day Quarantine Fee------------------------$ 6.00 per day (B) IMPOUNDMENT OF UN-NEUTERED ANIMAL First Impoundment-----------------$25.00 Second Impoundment----------------$25.00 Third Impoundment-----------------$40.00 Boarding Fee----------------------$ 4.00 per day Quarantine Fee--------------------$ 6.00 per day . A $15.00 refund will be given if proof that the animal has been neutered is presented within thirty (30) days of the initial impoundment. SECTION 8. (A) All dogs and cats which are adopted through the North Richland Hills Animal Shelter shall be surgically altered to prevent reproduction in that animal. The person adopting animal shall sign an agreement stating that he/she will have said adult dogs and cats (females over six (6) months of age; males over nine (9) months of age) surgically altered within thirty (30) days of adoption. Immature dogs and cats shall be altered by date designated in the adoption agreement. (B) It shall be the responsibility of the person adopting to provide proof of altering to the Animal Control Division. (C) Failure to comply with this section or failure to comply with the terms of either of the above agreements shall give the Animal Control Supervisor the right to recover the adopted animal in question and revoke the owner's permit. Such failure shall also constitute a violation of this ordinance. (D) The adoption fee shall be set to render neutral the cost of surgically altering, medicating and preparing said animal for adoption. ARTICLE 4. KENNELS SECTION 1. A kennel is defined as an establishment designed or used for the boarding, selling or breeding of animals where more than 3 dogs and 2 cats or 3 cats and 2 dogs are to be boarded, sold or bred. A kennel shall not be allowed until a kennel permit is issued by the City of North Richland Hills. The Animal Control Supervisor _shall determine, after inspection, whether or not such permit shall be issued. No permit shall be issued for a kennel to operate within 1,000 feet of any residence. Grooming parlors where no animals are to be kept overnight and veterinary clinics shall not be considered kennels, nor subject to this ordinance. 4 I SECTION 2. Ie I SECTION 3. I I I I I SECTION 4. I . I I I I I I I f I Such permits shall be valid for one (1) year from date of issuance. The permit fee shall be five dollars ($5.00). REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION OF PERMIT. Any kennel permitted under this ordinance found to be in violation of any zoning law, health law, or any other applicable law òf the City of North Richland Hills or of the State of Texas, or that is maintained in such a manner as to be detrimental to the health, safety or peace of mind of persons residing in the immediate vicinity, may have it's kennel permit suspended or revoked without prior notice by the Animal Control Supervisor. MULTIPLE OWNERSHIP. No person shall keep or harbor more than (3) dogs and (2) cats or (3) cats and (2) dogs. Puppies and kittens under 4 months of age shall not be counted for purposes of this section. Any person, firm, or corporation wishing to keep more than (3) dogs and (2) cats or (3) cats and (2) dogs "and who does not possess a kennel permit, may procure a multiple pet-ownership permit from the City. The permit once issued shall be a defense to the terms of this section. Such permit shall be issued through the office of the Animal Control Supervisor for a fee of three dollars ($3.00) and shall be valid for one year from date of issuance. Such permit contemplated by this section may be revoked by the Animal Control Supervisor if: (A) The facilities, upon inspection, show that they are inadequate for the number of animals sought to be kept. (1) Facilities shall be of sufficient size as to allow animal to move about freely. This shall apply to each animal kept. Size of facility shall be in proportion to the size of each individual animal's height and we~ght. (2) Adequate food and water must be provided so that each and all animals kept shall be maintained in good health and free of malnutrition and/or dehydration. (3) The said premises shall be kept in a sanitary condition and reasonably free of animal waste, parasites, insects and flies that could be harmful to the animal's health and/or to the health of the general public. (4) The said premises must provide adequate protection from the common elements, i.e, rain, heat, cold. (B) The animals kept are causing a stench or odor which is offensive to a person of ordinary sensibilities; or 5 I Ie I I I I SECTION 5. I I I SECTION 6. . I I I SECTION 1. I I I I (' I (C) The animal are maintained in a manner which is dangerous to the health of the animals themselves or adjacent animals; or (D) The animals are causing noise which is offensive or dis- turbing to a person of ordinary sensibilities on adjoining, adjacent, or neighboring premises. (E) Citations have been issued to permit holder for any violation of this ordinance on two (2) separate occasions; or animals covered by the permit have been impounded on two (2) separate occasions. HARBORING WILD ANIMALS. It shall be unlawful to keep or harbor any wild animal within the city without a permit, except commercial establishments dealing in the sale of such animals which have proper zoning for such a commercial enterprise and have proper facilities for the restraint and care thereof. The animal control officer and the city manager ·or his assistant may issue a permit to allow wild animals to be kept or harbored in the city, and shall establish the conditions thereof. BARKING DOGS. Any person who shall harbor or keep on his premises, or in or about his premises under his control, any dog or animal of the dog kind which by loud or unusual barking or howling shall cause the peace and quiet of the neighborhood or the occupants of adjacent premises to be disturbed shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which such violation occurs or continues. ARTICLE 5. ESTRAYS UNATTENDED ESTRAYS. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to allow an estray(s) to be unattended upon any public street, alley, thoroughfare or upon the property of another in the Corporate City Limits of North Richland Hills. The person, firm or corporation having ownership or right to immediate control of such estray(s) shall have the burden to keep such estray(s) off the public streets, alleys, and thoroughfares or the property of another in the City. Any person, firm or corporation violating any portion of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not less than ten dollars ($10.00) or more than one thousand dollars ($1000.00). 6 I SECTION 2. Ie I I I I I I I SECTION 3. . I SECTION 4. I I I I I I f I IMPOUNDMENT. It shall be the duty of the animal control officer in absence of action by the County Sheriff's office, to take up any and all estrays that may be found in and upon any street, alley, or in or upon any unenclosed lot in the City of North Richland Hills, or otherwise to be found at large, and to confine such estrays for safe keeping. . Upon impounding an estray, the animal control officer shall prepare a "Notice of Estray" and file such notice in the "Estray Book" located in the office of the animal control officer. Each entry shall include the following: (A) The name and address of the person who notified the animal control officer of the estray; (B) The location of the estray when found; (C) The location of the estray until disposition; (D) A description of the animal including it 'os breed, color, sex, age, size, all markings of any kind, and any other identifying characteristics. ADVERTISEMENT OF IMPOUNDED ESTRAYS. When an estray has been impounded, the animal control officer shall make a diligent search of the register of recorded brands in the County for the owner of the estray. If the search does not reveal the owner, the animal control officer shall advertise the impoundment of the stray in a newspaper of general circulation in the County at least twice during the next (15) days following impoundment and post a notice of the impoundment of the estray on the public notice board of the County Sub-Court House and of the City Hall. RECOVERY BY OWNER. The owner of an estray may recover possession of the animal at any time before the animal is sold under the terms of this Article if: (A) The owner has provided the animal control officer with an "Affidavit of Ownership" of the estray containing at least the following information: (1) The name and address of the owner; (2) The date the owner discovered that the animal was an estray; (3) The property from which the animal strayed; (4) A description of the animal including it's breed, color, sex, size, all markings of any kind, and any other identifying characteristics. (B) The animpl control officer has approved affidavit; 7 I, Ie I I I I I I I II SECTION 5. I 1 SECTION 6. I I I I I f I (C) The affidavit had been filed in the "Estray Book"; (D) The owner had paid all estray handling fees to those entitled to receive them; (E) The owner had executed an "Affidavit of Receipt" containing at least the following information; (1) The name and address of the person receiving the estray; (2) Date of receipt of estray; (3) Method of claim to estray (owner, purchaser at sale); (4) If purchased at sale, the amount of gross purchase price; (5) Amount of estray handling fees paid; (6) The net proceeds of the sale. (F) The animal control officer has filed the "Affidavit of Receipt" in the "Estray Book". FEES. For each and every estray taken and impounded there shall be paid to the City of North Richland Hills by the owner thereof or his agents the sum of fifty (50) dollars for the taking and impounding of the estray and the further sum of ten (10) dollars per day, except for the first day, for each and every subsequent day that the animal shall remain in the custody of the animal control officer. Such fee being charged for the caring and feeding of such animal. The owner shall also pay for any veterinarian or drug fees incurred for the animal while it is in the custody of the City. SALE OF- ESTRAY. If the "ownership of an estray is not determined within fourteen (14) days following the final advertisement required by this Article, title to the estray rests in the City and the animal control officer shall then cause the estray to be sold at a public auction. Title to the estray shall be deemed vested in the animal control officer for purposes of passing a good title, free and clear of all claims to the purchaser at the sale. The purchaser of estray at public auction may take possession of the animal upon payment thereof. The disposition of the proceeds derived from the sale of an estray at public auction will be as follows: 8 I, Ie I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I f I (A) Pay all handling fees to those entitled to receive them; (B) Execute a report of sale of impounded stock; (C) The net proceeds remaining from the sale of the estray after the handling fees have been paid shall be delivered by the animal control officer to the City Treasurer. Such net proceeds shall be subject to claim by the original owner of the estray as provided herein. (D) If the bids are too low, the animal control officer" shall have the right to refuse all bids and arrange for another public auction or sealed bidding procedure. SECTION 7. RECOVERY BY OWNER OF SALE PROCEEDS. Within twelve (12) months after the sale of an estray under the provisions of this Article the original owner of the estray may recover the net proceeds of the sale that were delivered to the City Treasurer if: (A) The owner has provided the animal control officer with an affidavit of ownership; (B) The animal control officer has approved the affidavit; (C) The approved affidavit has been filed in the Estray Book. After the expiration of twelve (12) months from the sale of. an estray as provided by this Article, the sale proceeds shall escheat to the City. SECTION 8. USE OF ESTRAY. During the period of time an estray is held by one who impounded the estray, the estray may not be used by any person for any purpose. SECTION 9. DEATH OR ESCAPE OF ESTRAY. If the estray dies or escapes while held by the person who impounded it, the person shall report the death" or escape to the animal control officer. The report shall be filed in the Estray Book. SECTION 10. BREEDING OF ANIMALS. It shall be unlawful for the owner or harborer of any animal listed in this Article to knowingly permit or cause to be permitted the breeding of any such animal within the public view. SECTION 11. ENCLOSURES. It shall be unlawful for any person to keep any horse, cow, cattle, sheep, or goat within one-hundred (100) feet of another residence or occupied building, or any hog within five-hundred (500) feet of another's residence or occupied building. 9 I, Ie I SECTION 1. I I I SECTION 2. I I I III I I SECTION 3. I SECTION 4. I I I I {' I ARTICLE 6. IN GENERAL VACCINATIONS. Every owner of a dog or cat four (4) months of age or older shall have such animal vaccinated against rabies. All such dogs or cats shall be re-vaccinated at one (1) year intervals thereafter. Any person establishing residence within the City of North Richland Hills shall comply with this ordinance within ten (10) days of establishing such residency. If an unvaccinated dog or cat inflicts a bite, scratch, or otherwise attacks any person within the city limits a rabies vaccine shall not be administered to the dog or cat until after a ten (10) day observation period beginning with the date of the bite, scratch, or attack. CERTIFICATE OF VACCINATION. Upon vaccination, the veterinarian shall execute and furnish to the owner of the dog or cat as evidence thereof, a certificate of vaccination. The veterinarian shall retain a duplicate copy of the certificate and one copy shall be filed with the owner. Such certificate shall contain the following information: (A) The name, address, and telephone number of the owner of the vaccinated dog or cat. (B) The date of vaccination. (C) The type of rabies vaccine used. (D) The year and number of the rabies tag. (E) The breed, age, color, and sex of the vaccinated dog or cat. RABIES TAG. Concurrent with the issuance and delivery of the certificate of vaccination, the owner of the dog or cat shall cause to be attached to the collar or harness of the vaccinated animal a- metal tag, seri_ally numbered to correspond with the vaccination certificate number and bearing the year of issuance. LICENSE REQUIRED. All dogs and cats four (4) months of age or older which are kept, harbored, or maintained within the corporate limits of the City shall be licensed. Cat and dog license shall be issued by the animal control officer or his agent upon payment of the required fee for each cat or dog. The license fee for cats and dogs. shall be $3.00. Before a City license will be issued, the owner of the cat or dog must present a certificate from a licensed veterinarian showing that said cat or dog has been vaccinated within the preceding twelve (12) months. If the veterinarian is unable to verify the same or such prior vaccination now undocumented, the owner shall sign an affidavit stating the veterinarian or clinic, the address, dat~ and owner of the animal at the time the vaccination occurred. The owner shall state his name and address, and the breed, color, and sex of the cat or dog to be licensed. Said license shall be good for one year from date of issuance. 10 ~I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I SECTION 5. I Ie I TAG AND COLLAR. Upon payment of the license fee, the City shall issue to the owner a license certificate and a metal tag having stamped thereto on the year for which it is issued and the number corresponding with the number of the certificate. Such tag shall at all times be securely attached to a collar or harness around the neck of the animal. In case a tag is lost, a duplicate will be issued by the animal control officer or his agent upon presentation of the receipt showing the payment of license fee for the calendar year. Tags shall not be transfer~ble from one animal to another, and no refunds shall be made. REVOCATION OF REGISTRATIONS (A) The Animal Control Supervisor or his designate may revoke any cat or dog registration after a hearing for any one or more of the following reasons: (1) Impoundment of a cat or dog by the City more than three (3) times during a twelve (12) month period. (2) More than three (3) final convictions of a person for violating this article when such convictions relate to the cat or dog which is being considered for revocation of its registration certificate. (3) Any combination of (1) and (2) totaling three (3) incidents. (4) Upon a determination that the cat or dog is a vicious cat or dog, as defined by this article. (B) Upon revoking the registration of any cat or dog, the Animal Control Supervisor shall notify the owner of the cat or dog of said action in writing. Written notification shall .~ deemed made when a certified letter, return receipt requested, addressed to the last known mailing address of the cat or dog's owner is deposited in the U.S. Mail. (C) Upon the expiration of ten (10) days after written notification of revocation is deposited in the U.S. Mail, as provided above, no cat or dog which has had its registration revoked shall be kept, maintained, or harbored within the City limits. REPORTING BITES. Every physician or other medical practitioner who treats a person or persons for any animal bite shall within twelve (12) hours report such treatment to the North Richland Hills Polic~ Department or animal control officer, giving the name, age, s~x, and precise location of the bitten person or persons and such other information as the officer or agency may require. 11 I· Ie I SECTION 6. REPORTING SUSPECTED RABIES. Any veterinarian who clinically diagnoses rabies or any person who suspects rabies in a dog, cat, or other domestic or wild animal shall immediately report the incident to the North Richland Hills Police Department or animal control officer, stating precisely where such animal may be found. If a known or suspected rabid animal bites or scratches a domestic animal, such incident shall also be reported as required above. I I I SECTION 7. CONFINEMENT OF DOGS AND CATS. Any owned dog or cat which has bitten a person shall be observed for a period of ten (10) days from the date of the bite. The procedure and place of observation shall be designated by the investigating officer or responsible agency, in compliance with State Law. If the dog or cat is not confined on the owner's premises, confinement shall be by impoundment in the North Richland Hills animal shelter, or at any veterinary hospital of the owner's choice. Such confinement shall be at the expense of the owner. Stray dogs and cats whose owner cannot be located shall be confined in the North Richland Hills animal shelter for a period of three (3) days and if unclaimed shall be destroyed and the brain of such animal immediately submitted to a qualified laboratory for rabies examination at the victim's expense. The owner of any dog or cat that has been reported to have inflicted a bite on any person shall on demand produce said dog or cat for impoundment, as prescribed in this section. Home quarantine as defined in Article 1, Section 1-K may be allowed only in those incidences where permitted by State Law and agreed to by the Animal Control Officer. Refusal to produce said dog and cat constitutes a violation of this section, and each day of such refusal shall constitute a separate and individual violation. Any wild animal which has bitten a person shall be caught and killed and the brain submitted for rabies examination. Rodents, rabbits, birds, and reptiles are not considered to be transmitters of the rabies virus and shall not be submitted for laboratory examination for rabies. I I I I I II I I I I I {' I SECTION 8. CREATING A HEALTH HAZARD. Any person who shall harbor or keep on his premises, or in or about a premises under his control, any dog or cat or pet animal, and who shall allow his premises to become a hazard to the general health and welfare of the community, or who shall allow his premises to give off noxious or offensive odors due to the activity or presence of such animals, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. SECTION 9. VICIOUS ANIMALS. No person shall own or harbor a V1C10US animal within the City of North Richland Hills: such an animal shall be impounded as a public nuisance. If impoundment of said animal cannot be made with safety, the animal may be destroyed without notice to the owner or harborer. Any dog which has, on separate occasions, inflicted two (2) or more bites where police reports were taken and quarantining was required and the dog was at large at the time the incidents occurred and the bites would be considered to be unprovoked by 12 I I the victim(s) shall be deemed to be vicious and shall be removed from the City within 24 hours following the owner being notified, otherwise, said dog shall be impounded and destroyed in a humane manner. Any animal which kills or maimes another domestic or pet animal or kills or severly maimes an individual shall be removed from the City with 24 hours following the owner being notified, otherwise, said dog shall be impounded and destroyed. Ie I I SECTION 10. GUARD DOGS. All dogs kept solely for the protection of persons and property, residential, commercial or personal, shall be registered with the North Richland Hills Police Department. The area or premises in which such dog is confined shall be conspicuously posted with warning signs bearing letter not less than two (2) inches high, stating "GUARD DOG ON PREMISES". I I Said area or premises shall be subj ect to inspection by the Animal Control Supervisor to determine that the animal in question is maintained and secured at all - times in such a manner so as to prevent it's coming in contact with the public. I II Said dog shall be issued a tag varying in color from City license tag, so designating that animal's function for a $5.00 fee. Said tag shall be attached to the collar or harness of the dog at all times, and shall bear the words "GUARD OR ATTACK DOG". Dogs registered under Section 10 shall not be required to purchase a City license tag as designated in Section 4, but shall be required to comply with the guidelines in Section 4. I I I SECTION 11. TAMPERING WITH TRAPS AND EQUIPMENT. No person shall remove, alter, damage, or otherwise tamper with a trap or equipment set out by the animal control officer. SECTION 12. ANIMAL CARE. I I I I I {' I (A) No owner shall-fail to provide his animals with sufficient good and wholesome __food or water, adequate shelter and protection from wéather, veterinary care when needed to prevent suffering, and with humane care and treatment. (B) No person shall beat, cruelly ill treat, torment, mentally abuse, overload, overwork, or otherwise abuse an animal, or cause, instigate, or permit any dog fight, cock fight, bull fight, or other combat between animals or between animals and humans. (C) No person shall abandon an animal in his custody. (D) No person shall give away any live animal as a prize for, or as an inducement to enter any contest, game or other competition or an inducement to enter a place of business; offer such animal as an incentive to enter into any business. agreement whereby the offer was for the purpose of attracting trade. 13 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I f I (E) Any person who, as the operation of a motor vehicle, strikes a domestic animal shall immediately report such injury or death to the animal's owner; in the event the owner cannot be ascertained and located, such operator shall at once report the accident to the appropriate law enforcement agency or to the local humane society. (F) No person shall expose any known poisonous substance, whether mixed with food or not, so that the same shall be liable to be eaten by any domestic animal or person. This Section is not intended to prohibit the prudent use of herbicides, insecticides, or rodent control materials. No person shall expose an open trap or metal jaw type that shall be liable to injure any domestic animal or person. SECTION 13. AUTHORITY TO DESTROY INJURED/DISEASED ANIMAL. The North Richland Hills Police Department animal control officer or authorized representative, is authorized to destroy any injured or diseased animal, whether such animal is on public or private property, and the recovery of such inj uries or disease is in serious doubt, and after a reasonable effort had been made to locate the owner of such animal. SECTION 14. PENALTY FOR VIOLATION. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed one thousand ($1000) dollars. Each day of violation shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 15. SEVERANCE CLAUSE. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. SECTION 16. REPEALER. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict here with are hereby repealed with the effective date of this ordinance. Passed and Approved this 10th day of November , 1986.. Dan Echols, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary Approved as to form and legality. Rex McEntire, Attorney 14 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Appointments to Cable TV Board & Library Board . . 11/10/86 Council Meeting Date: GN 86-122 Agenda Number: Administration Robert Courser and Lynn O'Day have resigned from the Library Board and Dolly Gilliland has resigned from the Cable Television Board. Appointments need to be made to fill these positions. Recommendation: Appoint members to the Cable Television Board and the Library Board. ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available f2 ~/~ Department Head Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 Department: eUbject: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Administration 11/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Proposed Objection to Zoning Ordinance in Fort Worth GN 86-123 Agenda Number: A property owner in Fort Worth has made application for a zoning change that would permit use of the land as a sand trap waste treatment facility. The property is located adjacent to the Trinity River Authority·s Water Treatment Plant in Euless which provides water to the cities of Euless, Bedford, Grapevine, Colleyville and North Richland Hills. It is believed that the incompatibility of these land uses on two adjacent tracts warrants the City of North Richland Hills registering an objection with the City of Fort Worth. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor be authorized to sign the attached letter expressing our objection to the proposed zoning change. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable .<\ Kl1~~ Department Head Signature ' City anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ·.·\~Jr. ~,.. \V .ál ~fl'l $ ~ .. ¡y.' ~",.i" CITY OF" NORTH RICH LAND HILLS TEXAS OFFICE OF THE MAYOR November 10, 1986 City Zoning Commission Application Division City of Fort Worth 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Re: Zoning Change Application Case Z-86-169 H. Mark Hardage - 3501 Liston Lane Gentlemen: The City of North Richland Hills has recently been informed that the Zoning Commission has received an application requesting a zoning change from Agriculture to Light Industrial for a 2.41 acre tract of land owned by H. Mark Hardage at 3501 Liston Lane. We understand that the hearing case will be placed on the next regular Commission Meeting to be held on November 12, 1986. This letter is submitted in response to this zoning case. The City of North Richland Hills has contracted with the Trinity River Authority of Texas to purchase water from the Authority's Tarrant County Water Supply Project that is located on the south side of Mr. Hardage's property. The Water Treatment Plant is a 27 million gallon per day plant which provides drinking water to the Cities of Euless, Bedford, Grapevine, Colleyville and North Richland Hills. The City of North Richland Hills along with the other cities have invested over $35 million in this water treatment plant. In addition, the Authority with concurrence from the customer cities, has contracted with the City of Fort-Worth whereby water from this water treatment plant is furnished to the City of Fort Worth in case of emergencies. The customer cities and the Authority are constantly involved in protecting the quality of this extremely important water supply. We must constantly strive to maintain the public's confidence in this water supply system. We do not believe a sand trap waste treatment facility should be located this close to a potable water treatment facility. We request that the zoning request, for this specific use, be denied. Sincerely, Dan Echols Mayor cc: The Honorable Bob Bolen, Mayor, City of Fort Worth The Honorable Russell Lancaster, Councilman, District 4, City of Fort Worth Bill Smith - Trinity River Authority Gene Riddle - Public Works Director CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Authorization for Mayor to Execute Amendment to Clty Manager's Contract - Resolutlon NO. ~b-4b Council Meeting Date: 11/10/86 Agenda Number: GN 86-124 Department: .Ubject: Administration The Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tern have completed negotiations with the City Manager for amendments to his Personal Service Contract. Recommendation: Request Council authorization to approve the attached Resolution and permit the Mayor of the City of North Richland Hills to amend the Personal Service Contract for the City Manager. e Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE , Fmance Director Pace 1 of 1 I~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I f'8 RESOLUTION NO. 86-38 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: The Mayor is authorized and directed to sign the negotiated Amendment to the Contract with the present City Manager that encompasses a merit increase, and salary adjustment. PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of November, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 11-10-86 Department: Purchasing ~ Award of bid for (5) five full size police package ~ubject: 4 door sedans to Jack Williams Chevrolet Agenda Number: PU 86-29 On November 3, 1986, at 10 a.m., bids were opened and read aloud to those in attendance. The bids are outlined below: Vendor ** Exceptions Each Price Total Amount Doran Chevrolet 1 $ 12,449.57 $ 62,247.85 Graff Chevrolet 1 $ 12,380.00 $ 61,900.00 * Jack Williams Chevrolet 1 $ 12,189.00 $ 60,945.00 Interstate Ford 1 $ 12,134.00 $ 60,670.00 Presently, the city has (88) GM model vehicles within the fleet as opposed to (10) Ford vehicles and (23) Chrysler vehicles. Soon, a perpetual parts inventory will be in place requiring an effort to stock interchangeable parts. A considerable amount of money and time will be saved in the parts category and in mechanic training. Even though Interstate Ford is lower than Jack Williams Chevrolet by ($275.00), the concept of fleet standardization will result in a significantly larger cost savings. By buying the chevrolet units from Jack Williams Chevrolet, we still have a budget savings of $5,055.00. ** Exceptions: All vendors claimed the same exception from the specifications; > section VIII, item 117, " fast idle, manual locking throttle control." As a result of the unavailability of this special equipment, the item has been delèted from the specifications. Recommendation: Award Jack Williams the þid in the amount of $60,945.00 for (5) police units. Finance Review Acct. Number RO-04-hhO() SUfficie~ynd..2~ble K~;2~S City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I' I tttar of the "Metroplex CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS II INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: II Jack Williams Che vl'olet Request For: Full Size Marked Police Units 9101 Highway 80 West Bid Opening Date: November 3, 1986 at 10:00 a.m. Fort Worth, Texas 76116 II Date: Requisition No. Attn: Fleet Sales Manager Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. November 3, 1986 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 I ~TEM North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041 DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL II 1 Full Size Marked Police Units 5 Each I;'..l~n 'O.1'#h.f!P. .. k"':>'>·;'-:::" '. >:;~..?:" '-~-<'" ,~ Per Attached Specifications ... .11 - ·Fj/,' II ... '..,"....'...,.<... ',,.··.t ~ e...~E..uQ.nLCi..;- Make II Modell' 0 g R. t (t c::. ~~ ~ A AJ ('ßLla4 ') . I- II 'n'o ... II II II - II II SUB-TOTAL i.... ! ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID j ~~ I. ~3 ¿t D tJ ITERMS % DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- ~ept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- I.,r to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS. I IN SUBMITTING THI:S BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. ~ COMPA Y: ;1'~t!...k lJ.J,L\ t At-\.~ -..Ù . BY: PHONE UM SIGNAT c5 ~ø 0 DATE: THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER I" ~, '.. Ie I 'I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAt'¡ING PROPOSALS - Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot . be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, . the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his----' bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and-free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be conši~ered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or condit:;ol1s not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the' City of North Richland Hills. . ;. ~ 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any . or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) \ihere the bidder, any sub-contractor or suPPlier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. - - I" Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie L 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF ·BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals· not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. . 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, ifÞit be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, þut not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager. . Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his .~s~ignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS ~ . ~; Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such no~ice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) I" ~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f L (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. , ". . ~. I' , Ie I 'I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the exceptions. The Citr of North Richland Hills reserves the ri~ht to evaluate variations from the sEecifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. Vendor Initial 3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel. 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 0'. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) milés. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. I' I. Vehicle - Full Size I_ I I I I I I I I_:~ I I , ,\ ~ I I 1. I I 2. 1_3. 4. I J 1. Wheelbase: 112" Minimum 2. Overall Length: 205" Minimum 3. Overall Width: 74" Minimum 4. Wheel Tread: Front - 60" Minimum 5. Wheel Tread: Rear - 60" Minimum 6. Headroom: Front - 39" Minimum 7. Headroom: Rear - 37" Minimum 8. Leg Room: Front - 42" Minimum ,. 9. Leg Room: Rear - 36.6" Minimum II. Chassis Heavy Duty Police Front and Rear Springs Heavy Duty Shock Absorbers, Front and Rear 3. Heavy Duty Front and Rear Suspension 4.. Heavy Duty Anti-Sway Bars, Front and R'ééK 5. Heavy Duty Wheels, 70 x 15 5 Lug 6. Complete Undercoating 7. To Have H.D. Front and Rear Brakes with H.D. Disc Brakes on Front. Brake Booster To Be Extra Heavy Duty with Dual Master Cylinder and Equipped With Warning System In Instrument Panel. III. Engine and Transmission Engine To Be Police Heavy Duty Type. To Have Special Heavy Duty Crankshaft and Valve Train Components in Addition To Other Special Components Designed For Sustained High Speed Pursuit Application. Engine To Have A Minimum Rating of 300 Cubic Inch Displacement, Rated At 165 Net Horsepower At 45 RPM Engine To Be Equipped With A Four Barrel Carburator. In-Line Fuel Filter (accessible from engine compartment) NON COMPLIANCE TO SPECIFICATIONS CONFORMS TO SPECIFICATIONS ~ V / / I ~ /' ~ ~ ~ ./ .,./ .,/ v' / v .,/ ,,/ / / I' I es. I Factory Power Steering 6. Factory Air Conditioning, Heater and Defroster with High Speed Compressor Cut Off Circuit I I 7. Dual Exhaust (if available from manufacturer) 8. Transmission To Be Automatic, Heavy Duty, Three Or Four Spee~, Low Speed Lock Out. I IV. Cooling System I 1. Radiator To Be Heavy Duty with Maximum Capacity Offered By Manufacturer I 2. System To Include 5 or 7 Blade Fan, Fan Shroud, and Clutch 3. System To Be Equipped With Sealed Coolant Recovery System I les. 6. 4. Engine Oil Cooling Unit Transmission Fluid Coolant Unit Silicone Radiator and Heater Hoses I I 7. All Hose Clamps On Engine cooling and Vehicle Cooling System To Be A Positive Closure Type ,.".T.o Hold Hoses Securely In Place and Position Under High Pressure and Rough Road Conditions. The Clamp Shall Consist of Stainless Steel Band Having Slots and Worm Screw Drive To Permit Tighting and Reuse I I I I I Ie I V. Electrical Non Compliance To Specifications 1. Alternator To Be Nominal 12 Volt, Heavy Duty SAE Rated 110 Amp, With "Built In" Silicone Rectifiers and Transistorized Regulator. Dual Belt Driven. Minimum Output At Engine Idle Speed To Be 50 Amperes As Measured By SAE Recommended Method 10 2. Alternator Must Have Fusible Link Or Equal Safety Device In Charging Circuit 3. Battery To Be Nominal 12 Volt, 500 Ampere Heavy Duty - Maintenance Type 4. To Have Special Suppresser Spark Plug Wiring and Wiring Brackets 5. Ignition Coil Must Be By-Passed To Ground With At Least .5 MFD 100 Volt Capacitor Conforms To Specifications v / / ~/ ~ ~ V". ~ / ~ ./ / .,,/ / v -..- v vi . / I' · Non Compliance To Specifications 1I4IÞ6. Quartz Halogen High Beam Headlights I 7. Trunk Compartment Lamp 8. Under Hood Lamp 9. Extra Dome Lamp Forward Mounted, Separately Switched II I 11. II I - I 13. Factory Installed Push Button AM Radio With Digital Clock I 14. "Radio Bounding" Kit To Body Ie 10. Dome Light Door Switch Control Deactivation Spotlight Unity No. 225 (or equal) 6" (15.24 cm) Clear Lens 12 Volt, For Current Model Automobile. To Be Equipped ~ith Aircraft Landing Light Quartz Halogen Type Bulb. To Be Mounted On Left Side of Windshield Post Spotlight and Outside Rearview Mirror Must Not Conflict. Spotlight Control Handle and Steering Wheel Must Not Conflict. 12. To Have Dual Horns VI. Body 1. To Be Four Door Sedan I I I I I I I 14IÞ I 2. Color: Top, Supporting Post, Hood and Trunk Lid To Be Burnished Silver Metallic Dupont DTJ~03. All Other Exterior Surfaces To Be Painted Navy Blue Metallic DT8834 In Color. (vendo~l r~sponsibility to verify color and color codes) Initial 3. To Have External Chrome Moldings hat Are Standard Equipment On Delux Model Vehicles. To Have Vinyl Inserted Body Side Moldings. Moldings To Be Of Rivet On Type - \1#/0 ~\...QG4 4. To Have Remote Control Outside Rearview Mirrors On Right and Left Sides Adjustable From Driver's Seat 5. Windshield and All Windows To Be Fully Tinted 6. Inside Mounted Rearview Mirror Suspended From Above, Free of Vibration, and Mounted At A Height and Position To Provide A Combination of Best Rear and Forward Vision. To Be Adjustable For Day/Night Driving. To Be Glareproof and Free of Optical Distortîons Conforms To Specifications /' / ¡ / /' / / ~ ~ / I Ie I I I I I I I 1e1. VII. Interior 1. Interior Trim Including Seat Covering To Be Cloth and Vinyl Color Coordinated With Exterior Colors 2. Floor Covering Must Be Carpet With Drivers Side To Have A Vinyl Insert 3. Front Seats Must Be Bucket Type (40/40) or (50/50) 4. Rear Seat Bench Type, Heavy Duty 5. Tilt Steering Wheel 6. Armrests on All Doors 7. Covering for Luggage Compartment To Be·Vinyl or Rubber 8. To Have Pop Out C~gar Lighter and Ash Tray Within Drivers Reach VIII. Equipment Five P225/70RlS Police Special High Speed Steel Belted Cord Radial Black Sidewall Tires I I I I I I 2. Jack, Handle, Lug Wrench 'tfr - 3." To Have Heavy Duty Intermittent Variable Speed Windshield Wipers 4. Certified Speedometer As Offered In Police Equipment Package 5. Remote Control Trunk Release Within Drivers Reach 6. Full Instrumentation, Oil Pressure, Temperature, Ammeter Gauges 7. Fast Idle, Manual Locking Type Throttle Control Within Drivers Reach 8. "Single Key" Fleet Keying (Universal Key) Non Compliance To Specifications Conforms To Specifications ~ ,,/ / ./' /' / ~ / ~ .r /' / ~ ,/ I' I~x. Each car(s) delivery will be checked for completeness at the point of specified ~elivery by a City designated representative before acceptance. I x. Warranty Offered: N ~UJ (LA (Any warranty exceptions, limitations or I E:)([r;;:,wD6D 5&;'t'<\l1t.E: W~R,~8~"tý - t.f..~(o.f().s. OR ':,-0.000 ~cl~. / I I Âd.d.. f5 ~.s-Q.. on PeR l./"¿,1 , f do.e..s I....eta . I Location warranty work to be performed: ~~ E:.\J R.ot C'r \)€-AL6.R<; h If. I Vendor must be for repair. I XI. Total Number of Days From Date of Order To Delivery (; Olo '10 I Ie I I I I I I I {' I e to insure that all Police vehicles will receive priority status- Initial - . ttr I" · Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by * (a>1",.,,\c.. \...allL,"A",,~ Q..~~v' complies with all the specifications as outlined in the city of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors * (b) ~ exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only ~ith the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or. any part thereof. Company Name JAC'K WILLIAr~S CHEVf~OLET, n'JC~ P. O. BOX 1382 'FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76101 -+ .t¡ Date It) - öZ.~ -- f? t, ~ MUST BE SUBMITTED ~ VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: * (a) Type or write in Company Name * (b) Type or write in Number of Exceptions, if none, so state "NO" I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Purchasing Council Meeting Date: 11-10-86 Award of Bid for Air Monitoring and Testing-Asbestos Abatement Program - Public Library & Recreation Center Agenda Number: PU 86-30 On October 29, 1986 at 3:30 a.m., bids were opened for air monitoring and testing for the Asbestos Abatement Program at the Public Library and Recreation Center. Please reference the attached letter from Kirk Drew, Drew Asbestos Consultants, Inc. Five contractors submitted bids, however, two failed to meet specifications. Of the remaining three, A.T.C. Laboratories, Inc. was the lowest bid. A review of the recommended quote is as follows: 1. $400. Per day for estimated 14 days $5,600.00 2. $400. Per day for any day over the estimated 14 days 3. $ 60. Per sample over the estimated 14 samples per day. I Recommendation: Recommend Council award bid to A.T.C. Laboratories, Inc. ~ ~ I * I , I I I Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) I Operating Budg _ Other , I Finance Review Acct. Number 13-50-85-4800 Sufficien ' ûnds Available /£7h7:: City Manager . Finance Director ITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of ---L-_ I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I· I I I I I Ie I Drew Asbestos Consultants, Inc. October 30, 1986 Ms. Janette Rewis City Secretary City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northweast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: Air Monitoring and Testing Asbestos Abatement Program Public Library & Recreation Center City of North Richland Hills Dear Ms. Rewis: After carefully examlnlng the quotes for the above referenced project my recommendation would be the ATC Laboratories, Inc. of South Dakota. This firm has met the quote-'specì~fìcationS- and can perform as required. A review of ATC Laboratories, .Inc. quote is as follows: 1. $400.00 per day for the estimated 14 days. 2. $400.00 per day for any day over the estimated 14 days. 3. $60.00 per sample over the estimated 14 samples per day. Your truly, ~¡:I!~~~ KIRK DREW KD:sb One Empire Square · 1140 Empire Central Drive. Suite 550 · Dallas, Texas 75247 214 / 638-1328