The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1984-01-23 Agendas I I. I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I 'f' I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 23, 1984 - 7:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER 1. ITEM *Executive Session to Discuss Personnel. Land and/or Litiaation ACTION TAKEN 2. Discussion of Other Items *Closed 8S provided by the Open Meetina Law I I. I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I· I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 23, 198~ For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:3' p.m. NUMBER / /' ITEM ACTION TAKEN Call to 'rder Roll Call ~ Invecation Consideration of Minutes of the Re ular Meeting January 9, 1984. Consideration of Removin Item (s) from the Consent Agenda Consideration of Consent A enda Item (s) Indicated by Asterisk (#9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 15) / ~ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING, PZ 83-68 Request of Randy Stewart to Rezene Lot 1, Block 31, College Hill Addition from Local Retail to Local Retail Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-Premise ConsumPtion (Located at the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Smithfield Road) ~ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-68 Consideration of Resolution Casting a Joint Ballot for TML Board of Trustees Election I I. I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 23, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I I I I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Acce tin Bid for 7,050 Tons of Flex Base and 250 Tons Aggregate I Ie I I I I I I I I· I * Consideration of Partial Pa ent, Estimate #9, Final, to Stolaruk Corporation in the amount of $16,140.91 - North Hills Street and Drainage Improvements ~- Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #10, Final, to Stolaruk Corporation in the amount of $28,173.14 - Holiday North Street and Drainage Improvements 3. Consideration of Partial Pa ent, Estimate #2, to M&D Construction Company, Incorporated in the amount of $26,125.20 - Morgan Meadows West, Drainage Improvements * Consideration of Partial Pa Estimate #11, to Austin Road Company in the amount of $17,13i.78 - Snow Heights Street and Drainage Improvements Consideration of Partial Pa Estimate #7, to Austin Road Com an in the amount of $90,248.43 - Rufe Snow Drive, Phase II ~~~~~ -- ~ - . ~ ,P~~ Citizen Pr~~en at on - '-7 11. Ad10urnment I. I. I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I RESOL UTION .g l/ - ~ WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council of North Richland Hills, Texas that Glenview Drive between Booth Calloway and Grapevine Highway be widened and improved; and WHEREAS, it should be noted that Glenview Drive between 1820 and Grapevine Highway is in the city limits of Richland Hills, Texas, and that, between Willman and Grapevine Highway the privately owned property on both sides of the street is within Richland Hills; and WHEREAS, there is an agreement dated April 3, 1978 between the cities of North Richland Hills, Texas and Richland Hills, Texas, whereby the cities agreed that Richland Hills assumes 30% of the cost of the project and North Richland Hills 70%; and WHEREAS, the agreement is very vague and non-specific and leaves much for each city to interpret 6 years later; BE IT THEREFORE RESOL VED that it is the intent of the City Council of North Richland Hills, Texas, to clearly define its commitments as follows: 1. North Richland Hills will provide 70% of the funds for the drainage construction between Booth Calloway and Grapevine Highway. (This includes Willman to Grapevine Highway) 2. North Richland Hills will provide 100% of the funds for driveway and sidewalk construction within its own city limits (on the north side of Glenview between Booth Calloway and Willman). 3. North Richland Hills will accept from the business community an amount of $21,867 to be applied to the cost incurred by the City of Richland Hills. 4. ~ Both North Richland Hills and Richland !¡¡ills will assume full responsibility for the cost of moving utilities and/~ny needed easements and right-of-way located within their own city limits in order to complete the widening and improvement of Glenview Drive. I. ; I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Resolution No. Page Two 5. Glenview Drive between 1820 and Grapevine Highway will be totally maintained by the City of Richland Hills after completion of Glenview from Booth Calloway to Grapevine Highway. 6. Problems arIsIng from the development of Glenview Drive (Loop 820 to Grapevine Highway) will be the responsibility of Richland Hills, Texl!s. ~~tÞ-f~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this)agreemenf4{fSVoid after three years from this date unless all right-of-way has been purèhased and construction has begun. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of January, 1984. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I Ie I I I I I City of Xrth Richland Hills~ Texas ~ ~. 4f ~.~.;:~ -~ ---,.. " Ji:--" '" , January 19, 1984 I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I To: From: Mayor and City Council Members Beverly Riley, Chairperson North Richland Hills Community Cable Advisory Panel Change of Meeting Schedule Re: At the January 17, 1984 meeting of the Cable Advisory Panel it was voted to hold meetings at 3:30 p.m. on the 3rd Tuesday of the months of January, March, May, September and October. This schedule will allow for the current level of business to be properly handled. Special meetings will be called when necessary. (817) 281·0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.0. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 78118 I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JANUARY 9, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order January 9, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim Ramsey Jim Kenna Richard Davis J.C. Hubbard Dick Fisher Harold Newman Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman ROLL CALL Staff: Rodger Line Jeanette Moore Dennis Horvath Gene Riddle John Whitney Lou Spiegle City Manager City Secretary Assistant City Manager Director of Public Works/Utility Purchasing Agent Finance Director Planning and Zoning Members: George Tucker Chairman Marjorie Nash Secretary Mark Wood Don Bowen Mark Hannon Press: Fort Worth Star Telegram Mid Cities Daily News Northeast Chronicle Absent: Marie Hinkle Councilwoman 3. The invocation was given by Councilman Hubbard. INVOCATION Mayor Faram advised the Council he would depart from the Agenda at this time. Mayor Faram asked if there was anyone present to represent Agenda Item #8 and 9. There was no one present. I I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I 4. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve the minutes of the special meeting December 5, 1983. Motion carried 5-0; Councilman Newman abstaining due to his absence from the meeting. 5. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of December 12, 1983. Motion carried 4-0; Councilmen Kenna and Davis abstaining due to their absence from the meeting. 6. None 7. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. 8. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to postpone Item #8 and #9. Motion carried 6-0. 9. Postponed. January 9, 1984 Page 2 CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING DECEMBER 5, 1983 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1983 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEMS (S) FROM CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (10, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 & 22) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING PZ 83-54, REQUEST OF M & W INVESTMENTS TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 4, T.K. AKERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 19, FROM AGRICULTURE TO INDUSTRIAL (LOCATED ON THE RAILROAD PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LOOP 820) POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-54 POSTPONED I I I_ I I I I I ·1 I_ I I I I I 'I I I_ I *10. 11. Mayor Faram advised the Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval, but the City Staff had recommended denial. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to deny PS 83-128. Councilman Davis asked if a drainage study was required for this one lot subdivision. Councilman Davis stated the reason he asked was because one of the comments from the Staff was there 'were no construction plans submitted and no drainage study shown. Councilman Davis stated these problems were not brought up at the Planning and Zoning meeting. Mr. Albin stated part of the problem was the owner's acknow- ledgement and dedication was not executed. Hr. Albin stated there was no fire protection shown and a couple of other items not complete. Motion carried 6-0. 12. Mayor Faram advised the Council he had two people who wished to speak on this item and with the Council's permission he would depart from the rules and let them speak. Mr. Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, representing Mr. John Barfield, appeared before the Council. Mr. Long stated the request tonight was for final plat approval of Sunny Meadows, 5th filing. Mr. Long stated this had been previously submitted overall in two pieces. Mr. Long stated they had received a comment letter stating that they would have to obtain permission to be able to discharge drainage water on the adjacent owner's property so they came back in and split the 4th filing into two pieces. Mr. Long stated the 4th filing was the one that discharged the major amount of water to the property to the south, Mr. Barnett's property. Mr. Long stated he thought an agreement had been worked out with Mr. Barnett for discharging January 9, 1984 Page 3 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-124, REQUEST OF SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR FINAL PLAT OF FOSTER VILLAGE, SECTION ELEVEN (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE EXISTING FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION) PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-128, REQUEST OF MARTIN DEVELOPMENT FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 18, BLOCK 1, MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES, PHASE 2 (LOCATED ON WEST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE, ACROSS THE STREET FROM NORTH RICHLAND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL) DENIED PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-129, REQUEST OF JOHN W. BARFIELD FOR FINAL PLAT OF SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION 5TH FILING (LOCATED EAST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY EXISTING SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION AND ON THE SOUTH BY LACASITA MOBILE HOME PARK APPROVED I I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I of the water, but he had been given a letter tonight from Mr. Barnett and did not quite understand it. Mr. Long stated this property was located on the east side of Mr. Barnett's and there was a street stubbed out into his property that would discharge a small amount of water onto the Barnett property. Mr. Long stated the water would go onto the Barnett property. Mr. Long stated the water would go south back into the right-of-way on Newman Drive and east to Calloway Branch. Mr. Long stated they had complied with the Engineers' letter and had met with Mr. Barnett with the understanding they would dredge out the existing stock tank and revert the water so it would go into the stock tank on Mr. Barnett's property. Mr. Long stated they had done everything they had agreed to do. Councilman Davis asked if the Staff was in agreement with Mr. Long's answer to Item 13 in the Engineer's letter regarding the water and sewer pro rata. Mr. Long stated the pro rata was in xhe 4th filing, there was nothing adjacent to the property in the 5th filing, all pro rata applied to the 4th filing. Mr. Joe Barnett, 6000 Davis Boulevard, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barnett stated there had been a considerable misunder- standing between Mr. Barfield, Mr. Barnett, Sr. and himself in regards to drainage. Mr. Barnett stated that Mr. Barfield must utilize their land for his drainage and it would cause erosion problems, repair and rights. Mr. Barnett stated it concerned the cutting off of the flow of water to his cattle and it concerned the security of the property and the screening of his property. Mr. Barnett stated he was furnished, by Mr. Barfield, after an early October meeting, a plat and it stated Sunny Meadows, 4th filing being a 71.3567 acre tract of land out of the John Barlough Survey, Abstract 130. Mr. Barnett stated the plat showed all of the property Mr. Barfield owned and the Council was aware the adjoining property owners were not notified about the Planning and Zoning hearings on plats. Mr. Barnett stated the plat showed all of the Barfield property to the east and north. Mr. Barnett stated that from a legal standpoint, if in fact there was an agreement, which he doubted there was an agreement between his father and Mr. Barfield, the words in effect were that they were going to do some planning with the City concerning some apartment zoning and they needed an agreement to proceed with the planning but before anything was finalized they would get back in touch with them. Mr. Barnett stated that every- thing had not been brought to the attention of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Council. Mr. Barnett stated he wanted everything upfront and in-sight, they did not want the burden of the expense for the development of Mr. Barfield. Mr. Barnett stated that whether this was the January 9. 1984 Page 4 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 5th filing or the 4th filing, there were streets stubbed off and in some places there were ditches six feet deep and twenty feet wide. Mr. Barnett stated they did not want erosion problems caused by the stubbing off of Mr. Barfield's streets. Mr. Barnett stated that according to the plans Mr. Barfield was going to stubb off a 60" concrete pipe on the property and they did not want large volumes of water dumped on their property. Mr. Barnett stated that evidently Mr. Barfield was not aware that in the State of Texas when you have a residence homestead, Texas being a community property State, any agreement that affects the property requires the consent of both husband and wife. Mr. Barnett stated that at no time was the matter discussed with his mother and at no time did she give her consent. Mr. Barnett stated that in fact Mr. Barfield had no consent concerning any of this development, the discharge of drainage, flooding erosion, repairing rights or whatever uses might be brought about. Mr. Barnett asked that the Council deny or postpone the 5th filing. Mr. Barnett stated he felt the problems could be worked out with Mr. Barfield. Mr. Barnett stated the agreement was composed by Mr. Barfield and not his father and it was not a workable situation. Mr. Barnett stated they did not want something that was not tied down in a formal fashion. Mr. Barnett stated he requested, at this time, the Council deny the 5th filing until all matters could be resolved and that the 4th filing be re-opened because the City Engineers' comments were not complied with. Mr. Barnett stated the 4th filing was approved by the Council based on acceptance of the Engineers' comments and they were not complied with. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barnett if the drainage was the major problem. Mr. Barnett stated the drainage, erosion, repairing rights and security. Mr. Barnett stated that the Mobile Home Park had constructed a screening fence around their property and he felt Mr. Barfield should also construct one. Mayor Faram stated that Mr. Barnett had said he felt the problems could be worked out, but did he feel drainage was the biggest problem. Mr. Barnett stated the drainage was the main problem. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barnett what he was suggesting Mr. Barfield do to solve the problem. Mr. Barnett stated that it must be properly engineered to meet specifications that the Soil Conservation would impose if it were under consideration by the Soil Conservation District. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barnett what he would ask Mr. Barfield to do. January 9, 1984 Page 5 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. Barnett stated that if Mr. Barfield was going to discharge a 60" conduit into the stock tank he wanted a stock tank sufficient to meet whatever the engineering loads would be for the tank, with a spillway that was adequate, specifications acceptable to the Soil Conservation for that size of a reservoir to assure that the dam would not wash out. Mr. Barnett stated he wanted the effluent going over the discharge to be channelized in a proper fashion. Mayor Faram asked the City Engineer if he had reviewed this to see if, in his opinion, the problems Mr. Barnett addressed would actually occur. Mr. Albin stated he had made a comment when he reviewed this that the developer was required to make sure that he had handled all the drainage coming upon his property from up above thru the property and discharged downstream in such a manner that the downstream channel was capable of a minimum 10 year discharge in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance criteria. Mr. Albin stated he had also requested that a letter be obtained from Mr. Barnett and other downstream property owners that would be receiving concentrated discharge and they were in agreement and would have no problems. Mr. Albin stated that obviously Mr. Barnett did have problems with this, because he wanted the tank improved to Soil Conservation criteria and the downstream effluent channel from the tank be improved also. Mr. Albin stated the requirements Mr. Barnett wanted was acutally beyond the requirements of the developer. Mayor Faram asked if the plat could be approved with the stipulation of approved to engineering standards. Mr. Albin stated yes. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barnett if this was his main problem. Mr. Barnett stated that he thought there would be erosion where the streets were stubbed off. He did not want ditches on the property. Mr. Barnett stated he had made four points: (one) drainage; (two) erosion; (three) repairing rights and (four) good and sufficient water of proper quality and security. Councilman Davis stated that Mr. Barnett had made reference to a ditch in the multi-family section and the ditch was in the 4th filing which had been finalized-for final plat. Councilman Davis stated the Council was considering a piece of property that did not affect the ditch. The 5th filing was a totally different piece of property and had met the Sub- division Ordinance requirements. Mr. Long stated the 60" effluent was designed to carry the 100 year flow and all of it was underground. January 9, 1984 Page 6 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I 'I I Ie I Mr. Long stated he would like to see the Council approve the plat subject to working out the differences with Mr. Barnett. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Long if he felt an agreement could be reached. Mr. Long replied yes. Mr. Barnett stated he wanted some assurances from the assigns, if a bond was required to protect his interest, then he wanted Mr. Barfield to purchase a bond. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Long and Mr. Barnett if they were confident an agreement could be worked out. Mr. Long and Mr. Barnett stated yes. Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if the plat could be passed based upon an agreement being submitted before the plat was signed. Mr. McEntire stated yes, but the Council needed to put a time certain in the motion. Councilman Davis stated that when the 4th filing was finalized there was written evidence from Mr. Barnett that it had been agreed on how the drainage would be done. Mr. Barnett stated there was no agreement. Mayor Faram stated the Council was considering the 5th filing tonight and the 4th filing was not part of the issue. Mr. Barnett stated he would not agree to anything in the 5th filing until the issues had been reconsidered in the 4th filing. Mr. McEntire stated the 4th filing had already been filed and the City could not void it. Mr. Barnett stated that the comments on the 4th filing plat were null and void if it said there was an agreement. Mr. John Barfield appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield stated he thought all minds had met when the overall plat was discussed with Mr. Barnett. Mr. Barfield stated he had received two letters from Mr. Barnett. Mr. Barfield read the following letter from Mr. Barnett: "This letter is to serve as our agreement to permit you or your assigns to stubb a street, which is the 5th filing, and a storm sewer system, which is the 4th filing, to my east and January 9, 1984 Page 7 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I II I Ie I north property lines with the further understanding and permission for you or your assigns to discharge storm water and enter my property and make the necessary ditching or grading for the same to drain. I am the owner of the property just south and west of your property on Davis Boulevard known as Sunny Meadows, 4th filing." Mr. Barfield stated the letter was signed by Mr. Barnett's father. Mr. Barfield stated that Mr. Barnett's mother did not sign the letter. Mr. Barfield read the following letter he wrote to Mr. Joe Barnett: "This letter will serve to confirm our agreement that you will allow me or my assigns to stubb a street and storm sewer system to your east and north property line along with the necessary ditching or grading for drainage. With you allowing me to do this I will clean out the existing stock pond on your property and ditch the storm water to this same pond in the approximate location shown on the attached map. I will leave the property in as smooth as possible condition. We will contact you prior to doing any work on your property in the event you would like to be present while the work is being performed. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. I~ you have any questions please give me a call. Fences and gates will be maintained where adjacent." Mr. Barfield stated he and Mr. Cook were willing to work with the City Engineer. Mr. Barfield stated that Mr. Cook had bought the multi-family and single family property from him. Mr. Barfield stated he and Mr. Cook had planned to develop the property jointly so he could be sure everything had been done according to what he had promised. Mr. Barfield stated he had no intention of damaging Mr. Barnett's property. Mr. Barfield stated he did get the letters from Mr. Barnett before the 4th filing was approved because it was a requirement of the City. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barfield if he was satisfied that an agreement could be worked out between himself and Mr. Barnett. Mr. Barfield stated yes. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barfield if he would have any objections with passing the plat based on the City receiving such a letter of satisfaction from both parties. January 9, 1984 Page 8 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I -I I I -I I Ie I Mr. Barfield stated he would like to see the plat passed with the letter in hand. He had already made an agreement with the stipulation the City Engineer would be the one to make the final determination on the pond and ditch. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve PS 83-129 as recommended, subject to Engineers' comments, with only one stipulation that the City Engineer cooperate with Mr. Barfield, Mr. Barnett and Mr. Cook in trying to route the drainage ditch on the 4th filing, but not a condition on approval and recording of the 5th filing. Motion carried 6-0. 13. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. Mr. Barry Knight, representative of Preferred Properties, appeared before the Council. Mr.- Knight stated his firm owned 12 acres located on Rufe Snow Drive. Mr. Knight stated the property was currently zoned multi-family, 19.8 units per acre. Mr. Knight stated his client purchased the property relying on a letter from the City that the property could be developed 19.8 per acre. Mr. Knight stated his client had already spent a considerable amount of money on plans based on the 19.8 density. Mr. Knight stated his client requested that their be a grand- father clause under the old zoning regulations. Mr. Knight stated one other concern was that it was unclear whether an apartment that had a greater than 16 unit density per acre had a non-conforming building or use. Mr. Knight stated the Council might want to clarify non-conforming use. Mr. Knight stated he would urge the Council to give them a sufficient amount of time to get their building plans in and approved. Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Knight what he considered sufficient time. Mr. Knight stated six months. Mr. Bobby McMillan, Folsom Investments, Incorporated, 16475 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, appeared before the Council. Mr. McMîllan stated he and Bob Folsom owned 59 acres of multi-family property at Harwood and Highway 26. Mr. McMillan stated they would urge three amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. 11. Relating to density, recommend 24 to 26 units per acre. 12. Reduction in parking requirements, 2 spaces per unit. #3. Grandfather Clause for a minimum of two to five years. '4_~,'",,"""'" " January 9, 1984 Page 9 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. 1080 - ORDINANCE ADOPTING CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS COMPREHENS IVE ZONING ORDINANCE APPROVED I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I 1 I Ie I January 9, 1984 Page 10 Mr. J.B. Sandlin, 5137 Davis Boulevard, appeared before the Council. Mr. Sandlin stated the proposed ordinance had been discussed so many times he was confused on what was being adopted if approved. Mr. Sandlin stated he had met with the Planning and Zoning Commission and they had discussed a lot of changes and he was not sure if the changes were included for Council approval. Mayor Faram asked Councilman Kenna to state the recommended changes. Councilman Kenna stated the following changes that were different from the last public hearing: R-I Changed front building line from 30 feet to 25 feet R-I-Changed side building line from 8 feet to 7 feet R-I-2-3-Changed rear building line from 25 feet to 20% of area lot R-2-Side building line changed from 7 feet to 6 feet R-2-Width of lot changed from 75 feet to 70 feet R-3-Width of lot changed from 70 feet to 65 feet R-5-D-Rear Building Line from 20 feet to 20% of the area lot R-6-T-Maximum lot coverage from 55% to 65% R-7-MF-Planned Development from 16 units per acre to 20 per acre LR-Did not ~llow banks, dry cleaning with a plat will be allowed in C-l C-1-2-Maxfmum lot coverage changed from 40% to 50% C-t-I-1-Height of Building set back abutting residential from 1 foot set back for 1 foot height to 1 foot for l~ feet C-2-Outdoor storage allowed was limited being more specific changed· to 20% of lot area I-I-Manufacturing was allowed - no manufacturing allowed Section 22.6.3.-Disabled parking is now according to State Law rather than 1 space for every 10,000 square feet of building Section 27.6.2 variance there is an addition in wording that states the Zoning Board of Adjustments can not change the allowed used in the Zoning classifications Mr. Sandlin stated that in Local Retail reference was made that you could not have a strip center and in C-l a shopping mall, it was to be clarified that in C-l you could have ~ strip center. Councilman Davis stated that a strip center was allowed in C-l. Mr. Sandlin stated parking was not related to and that was a big issue. Councilman Davis stated there were quire a few changes in the parking requirements. I I Ie I I I I I ¡I Ie I I I I I II I Ie I Councilman Kenna stated there was no way to relate to the parking. The recommendations related to sections in the Ordinance. Councilman Kenna stated the following on parking: (2) (b) Changed from 1 space for 300 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 150 sq. ft. class room (4) (a) Changed from 1 space for 125 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 150 sq. ft. floor area (4) (b) Changed from 1 space for 50 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 100 sq. ft. floor area (4) (c) Changed from 1 space for 165 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 250 sq. ft. floor area (4) (d) Changed from 1 space for 500 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 1,000 sq. ft. floor area (5) (a) Changed from 1 space for 75 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 150 sq. ft. floor area (6) (a) Changed from 1 space for 165 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 300 sq. ft. floor area (6) (b) Changed from 1 space for 165 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 300 sq. ft. floor area (6) (c) Changed from 1 space for 165 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 200 sq. ft. floor area (6) (d) Changed from 1 space for 165 sq. ft. floor area to 1 space for 300 sq. ft. floor area Mr. Bob Brady, 5750 Rufe Snow Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Brady stated that the comments relating to the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission alluded some difficulties in building height. Mr. Brady stated that in C-l and I-I he was confused on which way the adjustments were being worked. Councilman Kenna stated the Ordinance required less set back. Mr. Brady asked if it was 12 foot of altitude to one foot set back. Councilman Kenna stated yes, it was one to one. Mr. Brady asked if it was now 1~ foot up for each foot back. Councilman Kenna stated yes. Mr. Brady stated that in regards to the parking he did not know what was being talked about. Councilman Kenna stated he had no way of knowing, without going through the whole Ordinance to try and pick out which was referred to. In almost every case the parking had been cut in half. January 9, 1984 Page 11 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I II I II I Ie I Mayor Faram asked Mr. George Tucker, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission to speak. Mr. Tucker stated in the series of meetings the Commission had with the developers, their expressed concerns were in the areas of office use and multi use, concerning parking. Mr. Tucker stated he wanted the developers to know that what the Council was considering tonight was exactly what the Commission told them in the last meeting when the affirmative vote was taken. All the things the Commission said they were changing was in the Ordinance. Mr. Wayne Stewart appeared before the Council. Mr. Stewart stated he had plans submitted and changing the widths of lots for residences was discussed and he would like to know if there was a grandfather clause. If the plans were submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission at the present time, would it be considered to fall under the old Zoning Ordinance. Mr. McEntire stated the grandfather clause had not been submitted and until it was his question could not be answered. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Stewart what the present zoning was on his property. Mr. Stewart'stated 1F-8 and 7. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Stewart that if the ordinance was approved would the new classification be acceptable to him. Mr. Stewart stated yes. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve Ordinance No. 1080 with the addition of establishing a two year grandfather clause. Mr. McEntire presented the following grandfather clause: For a period of two years from the effective date of Ordinance Number 1080, property with a current valid zoning may be developed (Building Permit issued) under Ordinance Number 179. Where development (Building Permit issued) is undertaken under Ordinance Number 179 development shall conform with all of the requirements of Ordinance Number 179 and all policies consistently applied in the application of Ordinance Number 179. Where development is undertaken under Ordinance Number 1080 for a given tract, then all future development on said tract will be pursued under Ordinance number 1080. January 9, 1984 Page 12 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I If development (Building Permit issued) is not undertaken within the two year period; then the property shall automatically revert to the regulations of Ordinance Number 1080. From the effective date of Ordinance 1080 all requests for new zoning shall follow the regulations of Ordinance 1080. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to amend the motion to state '~o not allow 20 units per acre in multi-family including Planned Development, only 16 units throughout. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated one question was that if someone built apartments under the 19.8 and the 16 was passed would they be non-conforming apartments. Mr. McEntire stated they would be non-conforming, but nothing could be done about it Amended motion carried 6-0. Original motion, as amended with the two year grandfather clause and 16 units per acre carried 6-0. Councilman Davis stated the Planning and Zoning members were present and that the Council would like to express their appreciation to them for their long hours and hard work. Councilman Davis stated that they had done an outstanding job. Mayor Faram paid recognition to the Planning and Zoning members. *14. 15. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Newman to grant the Appeal Hearing on PZ 83-66 for February 13, 1984. MOtion carried 6-0. January 9, 1984 Page 13 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-118, REQUEST OF GIBRALTAR SAVINGS FOR SHORT FORM PLAT OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BEDFORD- EULESS ROAD AND BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY DESIREE LANE) APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING AN APPEAL HEARING ON PZ 83-66 GRANTED I January 9, 1984 Page 14 I *16. CONSIDERATION OF Ie RESOLUTION FOR PROPOSED INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS AT LOOP 820, PM 1938 and I STATE HIGHWAY 26 APPROVED I *17. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION CREATING A HEALTH FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT I CORPORATION APPROVED I *18. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE II, TO STEELE-FREEMAN I INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF $22,911.05 - NORTHFIELD AND I NORICH PARK IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED Ie *19. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE 110, TO I UNIVERSAL TANK & IRON WORKS, INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF I $23,805.00 - DAVIS BOULEVARD ELEVATED STORAGE TANK APPROVED I *20. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, I ESTIMATE #4, IN THE AMOUNT OF $52,260.21 TO M.A. VINSON I CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - WALKER'S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED I *21. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR HOSE AND HYDRANTS I - FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED Ie I 1 1 Ie I I I I' I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I *22. 23. Mr. Joe Barnett appeared before the Council. Mr. Barnett stated that what he wanted to speak about was the City regulations pertaining to alcoholic beverages. Mr. Barnett stated he would like to request that the Council convene a committee to discuss the regulations that the City might take in regulating the sale and traffic of alcoholic beverages within the municipality. Mr. Barnett stated it was well within the City's authority under General Powers, Article 9.62 of the State of Texas to regulate the sale of beer, etc. Mr. Barnett stated his request to the Council was to convene such a committee and have planning sessions, present a proposed ordinance for Council consideration, and also hold public sessions. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Barnett what the problem was, was he saying there was too much of it, that it was not spread around right or what. Mr. Barnett stated that when someone stopped and bought a six pack they started drinking it before they were off the parking lot. Mr. Barnett stated he was talking about public safety. Mayor Faram stated he was not opposed to improving the community, but on the 6th day of January, 1984, contrary to the laws that Mr. Barnett had read, that there had been an article published in the Star Telegram from the Attorney General stating that only the State, through the Alcoholic Beverage Code, could regulate the manufacturer's sales distribution, retail sales, transportation and the possession of alcoholic beverages. Mayor Faram advised Mr. Barnett his request would be taken under advisement. 24. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of January 9, 1984. January 9, 1984 Page 15 CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR CITY SURPLUS PROPERTY APPROVED CITIZEN PRESENTATION MR. JOE BARNETT RE: LIQUOR LAWS ADJOURNMENT Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I f City of J(órth Richland Hills, Texas ~/'yz~ ~. TO: Rodger Line City Manager DATE: January 19, 1984 FROM: Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Zoning case to be heard by City Council January 23, 1984 PZ 83-68 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Randy Stewart to rezone Lot 1, Block 31, College Hill Addition, from its present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail Specific Use-Sale of beer for off-premise consumption. This property is located at the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Smithfield Road. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I DATE: January 19, 1984 1 SUBJECT: PZ 83-68 Zonin~ request from Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific Use- Sale of Beer for off-premise consumption on Lot 1, Block 31, College Hill Addn. DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located at the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Smithfield Road. It is Randy's Handymart. There were 6 property owners within 200 feet contacted. There were several who spoke in opposition to this request. They were from the church which is across the street, but not within the 300 foot distance. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request with a vote of 3-1 with Mr. Schwinger voting against. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x ..4/~ {!~ I I A6 .,-0 'F--S .. . AG ~- -., Fe tð~..4Ð .. - (,-2:1- 8~ eQD. 'o~ I I I I / , I I t \\ \ " \ " , \] \ ~F;' , I, I . -. ." r-r" t , ) , I , I I , , . . I I I , , , , . I I . I Page 5 p & Z Minutes December 15, 1983 I Ie 7. PZ 83-68 Request of Randy Stewart to rezone Lot 1, Block 31, College Hill Addition, from its present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-premise Consumption. This property is located at the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Smithfield Road. I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Dub Hudman, Attorney, Rt. 1, Box 377, Azle, Texas, carne forward to represent Mr. Stewart. He said they are requesting a Special Use permit for their convenience store they opened in early August. Mr. Hudman said they presently have stores selling beer to the north and south of this store. Mr. Hudman said they have met all the requirements. He said the distance from their store to the church is 660 to 680 feet which meets both the city ordinance and the state requirement. Chairman Tucker said the survey shows 681 feet from door to door. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Gay Castleberry, 6109 Smithfield Road, came forward. She said she was opposed to them selling liquor across the street from her home and the church. Dwain Klopfenstein, 5513 Dublin Lane, carne forward to represent College Hill Assembly of God church.' He stated the number one problem was the traffic. He said the traffic would increase which is terrible on Davis Boulevard now. Mr. Klopfenstein said there had been a recent pile-up there. He said it was suicidal for pedestrians and school children to walk there. I Page 6 p & Z Minutes December 15, 1983 I Ie Mr. Klopfenstein said they have a problem exiting off Davis Boulevard to their church property; those getting onto Davis Boulevard from Smithfield Road never see the ones trying to exit from Davis Boulevard to our church. I I Mr. Klopfenstein said there are four convenient stores already on Davis Boulevard; do we need more? He said they do not want Davis Boulevard to look like 28th Street and Belknap Street. I- I I I Ie I I I II I I I t' I Mr. Klopfenstein said he believed the Commission should consider leaving the zoning as it is and if there needs to be more revenue, they should go where it is already zoned for this. Chairman Tucker said you have to ask for this Special Use in order to sell within the city and it is granted to the people, not the address. Chairman Tucker asked if he thought off-premise beer sales would add more traffic to Davis Boulevard. Mr. Klopfenstein said it probably would not increase traffic, but would cause more accidents. Joe Barnett, 6000 Davis Boulevard, came forward. He said he lives across the street from this property. Mr. Barnett said he was here to represent the ones most affected by this request, himself, his father, and his brother who lives directly across from this store. He said his brother has a very expensive home with a circular drive and he gets all the trash from this store. Mr. Barnett said his brother had two brick light standards, but one is missing since someone missed the turn and knocked it down about two years ago. He said his niece lives in the next house. Mr. Barnett said a number of people called him asking if he planned to go to this meeting, but he did not receive a notice. I I Ie Page 7 P & Z Minutes December 15, 1983 I Mr. Barnett said the law requires everyone within 200 feet be notified. He said the church received a letter. He said they have a child care center and the young people often have bazaars. I Mr. Barnett said Mr. Long made comment on item PS 83-129, the property directly across Davis Boulevard from this property. He said he would have the say where their water is dumped. I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I Chairman Tucker asked Mr. Barnett to stick to the subject unless it pertained to this case. Mr. Barnett said it did pertain to this subject. He said one of the streets they propose will probably intersect Davis Boulevard where Randy's is located. Mr. Barnett said the last time he came before this Commission, he expressed gratitude and stated that the State was going to widen Davis Boulevard. He said this has now been done and Randy's drive encroaches into the State Highway. Mr. Barnett said this is a high risk intersection. He said he understands the State did the labor and the city furnished the material. Mr. Barnett said there has been much in the paper about changing the drinking age to 21; the Blue Ribbon Commission has recommended stricter enforcement. He said in order to compel the States to comply, the highway funds were withdrawn and they are not paving any new lanes. He said if we want the street widened beyond Randy's, we will need Highway funds. Mr. Barnett said there are 27,000 deaths attributed to driving while intoxicated; one out of every 10 cars drive while intoxicated; and the leading cause of death of the 16 to 24 year olds is driving while intoxicated. I Page 8 P & Z Minutes December 15, 1983 I Ie Chairman Tucker said we are here to discuss a zoning case, not who they can sell to. I Mr. Barnett said there are several stores which sell beer both north and south of this property and he did not feel there was a need for one at this specific site. He said he would like to see Mr. Stewart be successful but felt this would make this area a hazard. Mr. Barnett said his property was across the street from the 7-11 store on College Circle. He said someone in a white pickup came across Davis Boulevard, drove across his property and demolished a building. He said there were 6 packs left there. Mr. Barnett said he plans to file a complaint with the police department. I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I Mr. Barnett said Mr. Long's, Mr. Barfield's, and Mr. Cook's development will give this area more traffic. He said not one citizen of North Richland Hills or any mother who brings their child to this church needs the pain and suffering this could bring. He said he did not feel they had measured correctly; he felt it should be from the property line of the church. Chairman Tucker said the State law says it must be measured from door to door and that is how it was measured. Alletha Barnett, 6201 Smithfield Road, came forward. She said she did not want more traffic; the Green Valley traffic is enough. Chairman Tucker asked for a show of hands of the people who were in opposition to this request. There were approximately 17. Chairman Tucker asked if anyone else wished to speak in opposition. I Page 9 P & Z Minutes December 15, 1983 I Ie There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. I I' Mr. Bowen asked if Mr. Barnett was contacted. Mrs. Calvert said she measured 200 feet around this property~ but she was not above making a mistake. I ~. I I ~ II I I I I I I ~ I Councilman Davis said they could be contacted. He said this is only a recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Barnett said he was not here to cause a problem. PZ 83-68 APPROVED Ms. Nash said in light of the fact that this meets all the requirements, she would make a motion to approve PZ 83-68. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. Mr. Bowen said he does sympathize with the citizens, but he does not feel the Commission could turn the request down since it does meet all the requirements. The motion to approve carried 3-1 with Mr. Schwinger voting against. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:35 P. M. CHAIRMAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas December 5, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-68, L.R. TO L.R.-SPEC. USE-OFF PREM. BEER GRID 96 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. f' RWA/ra cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 ·1 '~ · 'I .f' 'I , ¡ i 11 I I 'I P'2 f3//:,j .. o\~ , ~ ~ ~. ". . t tJ ~ ~<J ~ f() \¡ " " ~" ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ ¡ \t) ~ I ..!11J ~ ~ ......-' - --r,,;;---l' ---- -.2 74i---------¡t, " 7ð ~o/ o/.5I<7/?C'e ~ C:;;8/ t;! ,v?o;,.) / Oððl" I S<.'r?k- /" =/ðO ' ·.Æ~ë~8LY ð,r 600 C#URCN Ie '1 'I,; ,....~'~...;i I I I I I t' I r SKETCH SHOWING DISTANCES FROM PROPOSED CONVENIE~CE STORE TO MAIN DOOR OF CHURCH BUILDING. I, ..¥~_;q/ .øa-/ ,Registered Public Surveyor No. 2014, hereby certify the distances on the above plat are true and correct as surveyed on the ground. · Date 3 -,/4-83 .. ..~'.... W·ARD SURVEYING COMPANY . P. O. BOX 18253 'ORT WORTH. TEXAS 7611. Pf.fON' A ~ __ ~, "ft, ". , r, ~rr; \' i / 0 / \)~ I ~ . ~. ':. \. ~\ \ '( "". ..~ 't Q \.) / .~ . . " \ . ~'\. ,\ '- ~ , t' . ..' :1::\~'~ It..····' f ' ~;': .. -~ ';:;,~ . .},~:. .. . , :13·: '1 .,\' Q~ . . ." ) ; ( " , t '. ~ ~ , ~' " I·.. .\t ' '~.' ~.. " i (,'~: ; I ': '. " ..;_, , 'I ,. . ,..~.. I '\ , , ,. , I . ~, ,,' /" .,/ .. \' j .JA- ------ r " I"' , " -AI' 2 L r ...,:-; . ß\,;inu (J r,oct 01 ·pcHL.,1 of IUl1d du·r uf tf,~ J. t~. UOlluu~d, SUI Vt:) I A b s t f w.:. I Ii J 30 I S j h (J I (~d i n T u ( 1\ t ( 0 lllìl Y ,re)( ( ) S ,on d lh! i III) n,ol è particularly de~c' iblHJ Lv rnot,~~ (Hhi bounds Q~ tot JOVIS; ßCGlt..JNINC'; a1 un ¡fun pin in th~! .:n~t f~.O .\1.', lin~ of ~ll\i,th- field Road (County RooJ N30Ù'l}, suid point bùiny,C;outh, 597.9 .' (tJ¡)t from th" Soulhwc~d comer o( 0 trod Of land conv~yeJ r. om Louit.! L·. Chopmol1 tu Lotti e ßOI Li er und A. L. Borb; er, d) recorde ¡ n Vo I. 3673, POI) e 369 I Deed R t~(_ 01 Js , Tor (on t (au" ty I T e~o~i T ~ I r I'J C F. r. a'~ t I 96. 5 r l! e t too n ;. 01\ pin i" th e V/ 6~ t err y 'i n e ú í D n v i -) B 0 u It· V (H Iff r. f.', n n II d //1 ') J B \ ; f IIf r " j( . t ~ ( fl) " I " ' I y ,,' n t \ (I U .. U f V It full H' t" f, ,h, I t h (I \ U tf I d t ~' ( . r ï. Y ï :1 · ï I) I U l! J, (f d ¡ ) " II H ~" (J f / B ~ i "i ,.,,, It U (J f1 t I d" P ¡I) elf t h u i r \t e ¡" S l: l.. ti 0 n 0 f I h L' ,. n ~, R. (:' . '.. / n f .~ If. i , t I f i u t d ~ n C1 J ; T t i i' t 'J (~L ~'- t () t h , :~ 6 . ~ f L' ~ t t () t h t ~ r þ 0 ; , d 0 f ß F G U',~ NIt ,J G . .. , , ... . . ~ .."~: ')-. r~__ ~v ,4 .. ; I,. ,. ~. '\ t ~ ¡ .... SC Al t .',' J:~:~(~:~~8~l~~U:~~kY . I 5300 £DCrC1.1fr ROAD I roar WOkTH n:XAS PHON! WA ~·":n oa WA J o~o ~-. bdf:· b \'-^...." l..L\. ,. .1, ,.' I. - · - - -- _.':':..!'Y.. ~ - -......... ~ _ ~ _ .:erHI, Iha' Ihh (I1IJP "':JII 'UPO}I..J "oru h.lcJ nv..·. lJ .", .J:tU'll aUNU)' DhJJ. "r m,- ..r und", m, ~uµ-·("...~un no· I 011 tJ HII ~hr,_" d"J Cul'ItCI (1I,li pruþe' J II"tIl'Uh.t tu It", LtJa. uf M y ~ ovwl¡;d.,,,, r".J 1"'\1&' .1 h.,. cUe nu -ntlQ..J('hmwntl'l e- )f C t -: f d J J Jf.1t,! ,.,. " 'J o.,~ . ~;~. ;J~. " .' ..",. . f -_.~- o . . . I~ ON 'INI ,...C. tott D' UC IfI(. ¿ ': f l't . ,j .. ~ .-----..---.....--.. --,. .' - ..--.-.~ I JAN 1 8 1984 I. I I I I I I ;j/ffjJÝ) , .r- /"./} ~- f-1l1 d ~ iÃ cd 7 TO: City Council City of North Richland Hills DATE: Jan. 23, 1984 TIME: 7:30 P.M. CASE NO. PZ 83-68 We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE: "/- ~ /, )/1A--éJ~ - /J S ï C ,'J DATE: Barlough I f" -. ~ (1 ~ I ,--' , e I I I I I I I lilt I :1 I I I II II I I t" I '//f'!ð' ¿ / ' )f , ~;25 Pf1 I) I c:: ;~.r~:(~,i~ TO: City Council City of North Richland Hills DATE: Jan. 23, 1984 TIME: 7: 30 P. M . CASE NO. PZ 83-68 We, the undersigned residents and/or property owners in North Richland Hills not within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezoning of the said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. DATE: fJ ¿-YJ/l/7r/!{ '::--.Æ..J 8 1~18 4 ~ ~ Io.ðõoi ~J~~~_ ~Ð~ _r~ --- I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 83-68 the following described property shall be rezoned from Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-premise Consumption. BEING Lot 1, Block 31, College Hill Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hill, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 61, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This propery is located at the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Smithfield Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 15th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1983. r~··t ";<"/~;> ." /,. /\ ~".. /- 7--- n ,'. ._,/~ .' "-' :. . ~ '-..;0 .;·~~e Y"' <----Y"). _ C-.,.'.~,·.,.,",,_~i~,~.,.,,":,~ ~...~l~.ann)f__~n.'/f --". g & Zoning Commission (;?¡;) 7 A~'-<ï ."" ,', ~', ~--2?(-:t..-- Secretary, ~~n:~::~ Zoning Commission BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERY IN CASE NO.PZ-83-68 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Rex McEntire, City Attorney I.. I f I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I DATE: Januaiy 23, 1984 q SUBJECT: TML Board of Trustees Election DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The attached letter from TML lists five members currently serving on the Board of Trustees who are candidates for re-election. The Council is required to adopt a resolution casting a joint ballot for these (or other) candidates. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve Resolution BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO N/A N/A I. I , I I I I I I Ie I 1 I I I I I -- I RESOLUTION NO. Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: The City of North Richland Hills does hereby cast its vote for the following Board of Trustees candidates of the Texas Municipal League Workers' Compensation Joint Insurance Fund and the Texas Municipal Joint Self-Insurance Fund: Carl L. White R. Marvin Townsend F. William (Bubba) Hoermann L. Don Dodson Alfred H. (AI) Koebig Passed and approved this day of 1984. Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary I I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- -I ;ÆlW TML R I S K & 1 ~ S L~ R :\ ~ l" E ~-\_~-~~G E\ 1~ ~-l~---S_E R\Tl(~E_$ January 4, 1984 ELECTION NOTICE TO: All Fund Members FROM: Nominating Committee SURJECT: Board of Trustees Election A Board of Trustees composed of 15 members governs the TML Workers' Compensation Joint Insurance Fund and TML Joint Self-Insurance Fund (liability and property insurance coverages). Fund members elect five of the Trustees each ye?r (a complete list of current Board members can be found on Page 4). The following five candidates are currently serving on the Board of Trustees and are up for re-election. Please consider the five candidates listed on this ballot and indicate your choices by placing a check in the slot next to the name. Write-in candidates may be listed in the spaces at the end of the ballot. Please mail your ballot to: TML FUND 1020 Southwest Tower Austin, Texas 78701 All hallots must be returned by Friday, January 27. Carl L. White Director of Finance, City of San Antonio, since 1971; has served on the Board of Trustees since inception of the TML Fund in lq74. He is currently President of the Municipal Finance Officers As@.o- ciation (MFOA-National) and has liKewise served as President of the MFOA-Texas Chapter. Mr. White's department includes the risk management division which has responsibility for all City of San Antonio risk and insurance matters. R. Marvin Townsend City Manager of Laredo; has served on the Board of Trustees since 1 q7 4 and as Chairman of the Board for the past four years. He has 28 years of munic- ipal management exp~rience having previously served 1020 SOUTHWEST TO'X'ER · ALJSTI~¡, TE'XAS iB70l · (512) 478-6601 I I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I Page 2 ELECTION NOTICE as City Manager of Corpus Christi for 14 years. Mr. Townsend likewise distinguished himself as President of the Texas City Management Association (1980-81). F. William (Bubba) Hoermann Councilman, City of Andrews; is completing two years of service on the Board of Trustees. He is President of the First National Bank of Andrews and provides the banking and investment management insights to the Board of Trustees' de1iherations. L. Don Dodson Mayor of Bedford since 1972; has a rich hackground in municipal policy leadership and business manage- ment positions. In addition to his Tarrant County civic leadership posts, he has served on the TML Board of Directors for eight years, and as President of the Texas Association of Mayors, Councilmembers & Commissioners. Mayor Dodson is a Baylor graduate and owner of a nationwide oil marketing firm. Alfred H. (Al) Koebig One of three citizen members on the Board of Trust- ees. He brings more than 30 years of local govern- ment, general insurance management, and civic leadershi p skills to the Board's decision-making process. His 16 years as Mayor of Seguin, 12 years on the TML Board of Directors, tenure as President of the Texas Municipal League (1971-72), and owner of a Seguin all-lines general insurance agency are examples of his broad-based experience. WRITE-IN CANDIDATES CERTIFICATE I certify that the votes cast for candidates on the ahove ballot have been cast in accordance with the will of the majority of the members of the governing body of the City of , as expressed by resolution of said governing body. I I , I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I -- I Page 3 ELECTION NOTICE Witness my hand and seal of the City of day of 1984. , this the (City Secretary/City Clerk) City of (SEAL) I I {' Page 4 ELECTION NOTICE I TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE WORKERS' COMPENSATION JOINT INSURANCE FUND AND JOINT SELF-INSURANCE FUND I BOARD OF TRUSTEES I I Place 1 --Carl White, Director of Finance, San Antonio Place 2 --R. Marvin Townsend, City Manager, Laredo Place 3 --F. William Hoermann, Councilruember, Andrews Place 4 --L. Don Dodson, Mayor, Bedford Place 5 --Alfred H. Koebig, Seguin (Citizen Member) I I Place 6 --Ed Wagoner, General Manager, Texas Municipal Power Agency Ie I Place 7 --Georgia Langston, Director of Personnel, Bryan Place 8 --Rutha Waters, Councilmember, Waxahachie Place 9 --Donald S. Henderson, El Paso (Citizen Member) I Place 10--Evelyn M. Lord, Mayor Pro Tern, Beaumont Place Il--John C. Ross, Jr., City Attorney, Lubbock I Place 12--N. Alex Bickley, Dallas (Citizen Member) I Place 13--Barbara Litchfield, Director of Personnel, Houston Place 14--Cesar Gonzalez, Mayor, San Benito I Place lS--Richard D. Brown, TML Executive Director, Austin I I -- I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I If' I DATE: 1-23-84 It) SUBJECT: 7,050 Tons Flex Base and 250 Tons Aggregate DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: On January 9,1984 at 10:00 A.M. bids were opened on the above mentioned material, and are outlined below. (5 Bid Specifications were mailed and 3 ~returned) VENDOR EXCEPTIONS o AMOUNT $59,220.00 Flex Base $2,700.00 Aggregate $55,275.00 Flex Base $3,290.00 Aggregate $54,919.50 Flex Base $2,505.00 Aggregate Whites Mines Collins Sand & Gravel o Texas Industries Inc. o The above material will be used to add the south bound lane on Davis Blvd. from Smithfield Rd. to Emerald Hills Way. This project was approved by Council on December 12,1983, and has been included in the CIP Program by the CIP Committee. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove the purchase of Flex Base and Aggregate from Texas Industries Inc. in the amount of $57,424.50 BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO Capital Improvement Funds I CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS Ie I $,tar of the "Metmplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM ( VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: "' I Texas Industries, Inc. Request For: Flex and Aggregate P. o. Box 400 Bid Opening Date: January 9,1984 At 10:00 A.M. Arl ington, TX 76010 I Date. Attn: Stan Dacus ReQuisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 A.M. January 9,1984 I I City of North Richland Hills, P O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: Ci ty Secretary Phone: 281-0041 i IT E r~ DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL II I See Attachments , ¡ I 1 ~ I I I I I I I ~ SUB·TOT AL ""- ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID I TERMS Net % 30 DAYS. F.OB. CITY OF NORTH IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC RICHLAND HilLS: DELIVERY IN 7 DAYS FROM CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR· f RECEIPT OF ORDER The C,ty of North Richland Htlls Purchas· CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH ,ng Dept. reserves the right to reject anv or all bids, wallie forma¡· LAND HillS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CO~SI ties, or to award purchases on an IndIvidual Item basIs when In Its TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. best Interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD· COMPANY. _ Texas Indt1~t,,;pc;J Tnr .-- - --- ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED FO.B. CITY OF BY. __u Stan Dacus -- -- I NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS. PHONE NUMBER ~40-¡700 SIGNATURE: .&::.-1.JL:J DATE: l.:.5..~ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I II I I I I I {' I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS P.O. BOX 18609 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 The undersigned hereby offers to sell the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions, and the specifications, and other conditions attached hereto the following. Flexible Base Item #249 4,700 Cubic Yards = 7,050 Tons Cost Per Ton $ 7.79 7,050 Tons = Total Cost $ 54.919.50 x Aggregate Item # 322 Cost Per Ton $ 10.02 200 Cubic Yards = 250 Tons x 250 Tons = Total Cost $ 2,505.00 Terms % 30 Days Net Flexible Base and Aggregate for the above are estimated requirements. Owner reserves the right to purchase more/less than quantities shown. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I The undersigned here by offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, . on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by Texas Industries, Inc. . complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland's bid specification, be it further specified that any non compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications is to be outlined in detail stating said vendors exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all· proposals. or any part there of. ~fj~ Signed Stan Dacus Sales Rep. Title 1-5-84 Date Texas Industries, Inc. Company Name TH IS MUST BE SLBMITED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION. I I eSUBJECT :, I . · I I I I I. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I / DATE: 1-16-84 North Hills Street & Drainage Improvements, Partial Pay 'Estimate 119 -' Final DEP ARTMENT : BACKGROUND: Public Works We have finally reached the final payment from Stolaruk Corpor~tion on the North Hills project. As you can see from the engineer's letter. they did ~ . not receive.$l6,84l.10 because of poor workmanship and slowness in ·getting the iob done. CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: amount of $l6,l40.9l. Approve/disapprove payment to Stolaruk Corp. in the BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO GO Bonds ------------------~----------~-~---------~--------------------------- ~. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I be~~ . KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, ..1 NC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 12, 1984 Honorable M~or and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-325, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS' NORTH HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE. IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.9, FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor1s Partial Pay Estimate No.9, and Final, dated January 12, 1984, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation, in the amount of $16,140.91, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of August 8, 1983. This project includes curb and gutter, asphalt pavement and ut;li~ line reconstruction on the following streets: North Hills Drive, Circular Drive, Reeves Street, Northcut Drive, and Orient Court. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item ,extensions and additions. We would note that this final estimate includes deductions for Public Works Department costs associated with this project in the amount of $4,141.10; a penal~ for deficient pavement thickness at several locations in the amount of $9,500; and liquidated damages for 32 days over the scheduled completion date in the amount of $3,200. Additional paymeRts to the Contractor were made for change orders and extra quantities of construction as noted on the attached ·Construction Project Status ReportU which accounts for differences in the original estimated quantities and actual as-built quantities. We recommend that this final payment, in amount of $16,140.91, be made to Stolaruk Corporation at P.O. Box 612226, D.F.W. Airport, Texas 75261. In accordance with Section 3.2.11(a) of the ,Contract, the two (2) year tenm of maintenance will begin on this date, and therefore, will terminate on January 12. 1986. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, fire hydrants, and other equipment furnished and installed under this Contract along with sewer line breaks or stoppage. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing January 12, 1984 North Hills S. & D. Page 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021. 817/283-6211 . METRO/287-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I DATE: 1-16-84 WI I~ SUBJECT: Holiday North Street & Drainage Improvements, Pay Estimate #10 - Final Public Works DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: As you can see this is for Stolaruk Corporation a2ain. and thpy had deductions on this job also and ran over 12 days on their time. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove payment to Sto1aruk Corp. in the amount of $ 28,173.14. BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: ~ ~ I~ Ie I I I I I I 1 -- I, 1 1 I I I I , I ~ G~~~ KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 12, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-328, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HIllS HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIM. NO. 10, FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 10, and Final, dated January 12, 1984, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation, in the amount of $28,173.14, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of September 23, 1983. This project includes curb and gutter, asphalt pavement and utility line reconstruction on the following streets: Susan Lee, Cummings Drive East, Randle Drive, and Mary Frances Drive. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We would note that this final estimate includes deductions for Public Works Department costs associated with this project in the amount of $1,040.28; and liquidated damages for 12 days over the scheduled completion date in the amount of $1,200. Additional payments to the Contractor were made for change orders and extra quantities of construction as noted on the attached "Construction Project Status Report" which accounts for differences in the original estimated quantities and " actual as-built quantities. We recommend that this final payment, in amount of $28,173.14, be made to Stolaruk Corporation at P.O. Box 612226, D.F.W. Airport, Texas 75261. In accordance with Section 3.2.11(a) of the Contract, the two (2) year term of maintenance will begin on this date, and therefore, will terminate on January 12, 1986. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, fire hydrants, and other equipment furnished and installed under this Contract along with sewer line breaks or stoppage. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures, along January 12, 1984 Holiday North S. & D. Page 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 : .;:.,.;.~c":0¡::~t'::~~'í';;;~~;:~i,:~i~~~'-:""-;:"t.':',"<P.;:~~t~~~~>f1?ì~~~~~A~~~.::rtP.;(~'~/~':~"'~~,;;;!<'l'iJjl~~i';¡W.J..i.:tV~1~y,~.q:,~è;'W""J1""\'1:~r'·~Ø:r.'7~~"~"'T:!'''''''l'~~~''''~;'#~;;';·,.~;i'~:'>';;..··;,"".'" '/'i' '0'.·'··;:....", ". .,";''''''''''_ ,_. ..... w.........,....> ~ I DATE: 1-l6-84 \'2 ,..J I ~UBJECT :, I· · Morgan Meadows West Drainage Improvements, Pay Estimate'#Z I DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: This project is about 70% complete at this time. The· contractor is I still using the bypass road·and 'waiting for a developer on the north side 'of' .... . .' . Chapman to ,lay. some storm drain and sewer pipe before he proceeds to open up I the permanent ròadway for traffic. I I I Ie" I I I CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove payment to M & D Construction Co., I in the amount of $26,125.20. I I I -- I BUDGETED ITEM: . YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: GO Bonds ------------------~----~---~ ' ----------------------------------------- V· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 6. 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Rfchland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-317(A), CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MORGAN MEADOWS, WEST, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor IS Partial p~ Estimate No.2, dated January 6. 1984, made payable to MiD Construction Co., Inc., in, the amount of $26,215.20. for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of December 31. 1983. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the . estimate-, and ~ have checked·· the'itetll~ ex·tensions . and ·additions. We recommend that this p~ent. in amount of $26,125.20, be made to MID Construction Co., Inc., P.O. Box 8047, Fort Worth, Tx., 76124. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month IS estimate. We will be prësent at the next Council Meeting to answer a~ questions you ~ have concerning this project. RWA/llg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Ci~ Manager ~Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works- Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd MCCallum. 'City Inspector Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. David S. Humphrey, MiD Construction Co., Inc. !5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I , ,SUBJECT:, DIP ARTMENT : BACKGROUND: For all practical purposes the Snow Heights project is complete but the contractor is still working on a change order for Wendell Drive. ~ Wendell Driv~ is almost complete at this time but they have been.hel~ up because of the bad weather. DATE: l-l6-84 ) t Snow Heights Street & ·Drainage Improvements, Pay Estimate #ll I I I I Public. WQrks I, I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove payment to Austin Road Co., in the amount of $l7,l36.78. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X GO Bonds ------------------~---~-------------------~--------------------------- NO v· I , I I I I -I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 5, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-326, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SNOW HEIGHTS 1982, STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 11 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor1s Partial Pay Estimate No. 11, dated January 5,1984, made payable to Austin Road Company, in the amount of $17,136.78, for materials furnished and work perfonmed on the referenced project as of December 31, 1983. The quanttties and ccmdftton- of- the- project have' been- vertftecl on-site- by' your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $17,136.18, be made to Austin Road Company, at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month1s estimate. We wi11 be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions y~u may have concerning this project. RWA/llg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ~Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road Company 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-8211 · METRO/2457-3367 - - --- I I F} DATE: l-l6-84 '.SUBJEr:r:, Rufe Snow Drive, Phase II, Pay Estimate #7 DEPARTMENT: Public W.orks I I I I I I BACKGROUND: Rufe Snow is opened all the way and pretty well completed except for some traffic·markings, manhole adjustments, and the completion of one l~ne ~t the . . ,. railroad c·ròs~ing. The contractor had hoped to complete ....th~s job by the end of 1983, but because of the bad weather it was delayed and he is missing o~t on $600 per day bonus. I would like to say that Austin Road has done a f.irst ciass job on this project and they are· to be commended for their workmanship. Ie" I I I I I I I Ie I CITY COt.:"NCIL A~ION REQUIRED: amount of $90,248.43. Approve/disapprove payment to Austin Road .Co., in the BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO ~-~------~_... ______~~o_:~~~~_ ~________-_-___-----~--------------------------- I (' I I I I I' I Ie I I I I I I I -- I KNOWL TON-E NC LISH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas , . ~ : January 6, 1984 ~ . Honorable M~or and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 t f. : RE: 3-218, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RUFf SNOW DRIVE PHASE II, STREET AND DRAI~AGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.7 Þ! ,1 ,J t¡ . iii I ,,,¡ ¡!.ji ; ':;~ ;1J ~! ~ ! ·1 ! i I : I i ! ! i ~ I I Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 7~ dated January 6, 1984, made p~able to Austin Road Company, in the amount of $90,248.43, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of December 31, 1983. The quaRtitie-s·aFKI condition of·the pro.ject have been· verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $90,248.43, be made to Austin Road Compa~, at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. . We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer a~ questions you ~ have concerning this project. RWA/llg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager .?Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road Company 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ ! : ~ t l : f r !5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3387