The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1984-02-13 Agendas I I I- I .1 1 I '1 . 1 I I I I I I I ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 13, 1984 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER 1. 2. 3. 4. ITEM Discussion of the Zoning Map - Planning and Zoning Commission Discussion of Water and Sewer System - Mayor Faram *Executive Session to discuss land, litigation and/or personnel Other Items ACTION TAKEN * Closed as provided by the open meeting law I I I- I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I , I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 13, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER L. Call to Order ITEM ACTION TAKEN ~. Roll Call t . .s; Invocation ~" Consideration of Minutes of the Regular Meeting January 23, 1984. ,j". Consideration of Removing Item (s) from the Consent Agenda ~ Consideration of Consent Agenda Item (s) Indicated b Asterisk (#12, 13, 14, 15, 6 I 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 & 30) j,/ . ...--' .-~; I '¡ :...;1- ./' ~/ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - PZ 83-66, Request of Gene Huggins to rezone Block 42C and Lot 21R, Block 5, Richland Terrace Addition from Multi-Family and IF-9 to Commercial (Located on the north side of Northeast Loop 820 Frontage Road and bounded on the west by Cloyce Drive) "'J Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-66 "I ,/~ ~ ll) .~; I I- I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 13, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM ~ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL ~ HEARING - PZ 83-54, Request of M & W Investments to rezone a portion of Tract 4, T.K.Akers Survey, Abstract 19, from Agriculture to Industrial (Located on the Railroad Property North of Northeast Loop 820) ACTION TAKEN ~ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-54 .,/ / PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-125, Request of .. Wayne Stewart for Final Plat of Blocks 13 thru 25, Fox Hollow Addition (Located on the South side of Chapman Road, bounded on the west by Richfield Park) *~ PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-1, Request of B & { M Development Company for Final Plat of Kingswood Estates, Section 3 (Located North of Starnes Road and bounded on the East by existing Kingswood Estates) /'~ *~ PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-2, Request of ,/ , Jack Cook for Final Plat of Lots 5 & 6, Block 1, Mollie B. Collins Addition (Located on the North side of Odell Street and West of Smithfield Road) I I. I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I r I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 13, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER .,~' ITEM *~ PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-9, Request of David Barfield for Final Plat of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition (Located on the West side of Precinct Line Road, between Amundson Road and Martin Drive) ACTION TAKEN *~/ PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-10, Request of , YMCA & Muhsen Shabout for replat of Lots 2R, 3R, & 4R, Block 11, Emerald Hills Addition ( Located on the East side of Davis Boulevard at Lynda Lane) * PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-11, Request of B & B Development Company for replat of Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition (Located on the West side of Strummer Drive, approximately 288 feet South of Grapevine Highway) ........- *~ PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-12, Request of M-W Development Company for replat of Lots 3R thru 14R, Block 42A, Richland Terrace Addition (Located at the Southwest corner of Maplewood Avenue and Cloyce Drive) / ~. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-13, Request of U-Tex Development Company for replat of Lots lR-l & lR-2, Block 6, Industrial Park Addition (Located on the South side of Browning Drive, approximately 184 feet West of Rufe Snow Drive) I I I- I I I I I I II I I I I I I I r I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 18, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER __- ITEM ~ PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-15, Request of Service Centers of America for replat of Lots 1R thru 4R, Block 5, Industrial Park Addition (Located at the Northwest corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Industrial Park Drive) ACTION TAKEN -µ(<' Consideration of North American Signs request for a variance from the Sign Ordinance m:- .. Consideration of Change to Capital Improvements Program .¿ -: Consideration of Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 722, Speed Zone Ordinance, Establishing Speed Zone on a Portion of Rufe Snow Drive *~ Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #2, in the amount of $145,370.16 to Steel-Freeman - Northfield Park Project .....,.....-.- ~ ./' Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #5, and Change Order #2, in the amount of $54,064.61 to M.A. Vinson Construction Company - Walker's Branch Drainage Improvements I I I- I I I I I I II I I I I I I I , I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 13, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM ~~".~...-~' *~ Consideration of Partial Pavment~ Estimate (' #11, in the amount of $66,765.00 to Universal Tank & Iron Works Incorporated - Elevated Stora2e Tank ACTION TAKEN * Consideration of Partial Pa Estimate #3, in the amount of $5,974.69 to M&D Construction Company - Morgan Meadows West Drainage Improvements ~- Consideration of Bids for Tractor and Mower -Public Works Department * Consideration of Bids for Conn Drive and Watauga Road Pump Station *~ Consideration of Ratification of Resolution No. 84-4, Glenview Drive (Added as an emergency item to the January 23, 1984 Council Agenda) *~ Consideration of Ratification of Resolution No. 84-5, Eminent Domain - Engler Property (Added as an emergency item to the January 23, 1984 Council A2enda) Consideration of Resolution Callin an Election for April 7, 1984, for the Election of a Mayor and Council Place 2, 4, 6, and Appointing an Election Judge I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I , I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 13, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 32. Citizen Presentation Re: Walker Construction Company's Operations Mrs. Bettv Beck 3801 Scru22s Drive 33. Presentation by City Mana2er - Testin2 of Civil Defence Sirens 34. Adiournment I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I ;- DATE: February 8, 1984 / APPEAL HEARING for SUBJECT: PZ 83-66 Zoning request from Multi-Family & 1F-9 to Commercial on Block 42C & Lot 21R, Block 5, Richland Terrace Addition. DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located on the north side of Northeast Loop 820 Frontage Road and bounded on the west by Cloyce Drive. This zoning change request is to allow the owner to have a new car dealership. The Planning and Zoning Commission denied this request on November 17th, 1983. There were 32 property owners contacted and several spoke in opposition to this request. Since that time, the owner has met with the property owners and now feel they are in favor of this request. Now they are requesting an appeal hearing. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zonin~ reqµest. BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO x ..2£~ (? ~- - ACCOUNT NUMBER: I Page 13 ~ P & Z Minutes I November 17, 1983 Ie 16. PZ 83-66 I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,.. Request of Gene Huggins to rezone Block 42C and Lot 21R, Block 5, Richland Terrace Addition, from their present classifications of Multi-Family and 1F-9 to a proposed classification of Commercial. This property is located on the north side of Northeast Loop 820 Frontage Road and is bounded on the west by Cloyce Drive. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Huggins. He said Mr. Huggins wishes to construct a Honda Dealership on this property. Mr. Hedgcoth said there would be 6,000 square feet of showroom and 11,000 square feet of parking. He said there would be a 6 foot screening fence along the east and north property line to Susan Lee Lane and the access to the property would be from the Access Road; none would be from Cloyce or Short Streets. Mr. Hedgcoth said it will cost approximately $550,000 to construct this facility which would be in operation 5~ days a week, 9 to 5 week days,half day on Saturdays, and closed on Sundays. He said they would sell approximately 125 cars per month and with the used cars, it would total approximately 175 cars per month. Mr. Hedgcoth said they have 6 other dealerships in Virginia and some in Florida. He said they have a Lincoln Mercury dealership in Washington, D.C. and a Datsun/GMC dealership in Lake City, Florida. Mr. Hedgcoth said in Phase I, they would expand the 7~ acre tract to the west and could later add a GMC/Jeep or a Lincoln/Mercury dealership. Mr. Hedgcoth said the present zoning is Multi-Family and one lot is single family. II' Page 14 ~ P & Z Minutes November 17, 1983 { I Ie I Roger Crownrich, Architect from Dallas, came forward. He said he had been the architect for Frank Kent Cadillac, Jack Williams Chevrolet, and Integrity Buick. I Mr. Crownrich said he had Solomon Peterson with him who is a design specialist. I Mr. Peterson came forward. He said they have designed approximately 8 dealerships in the Metroplex. He showed their proposal for this site. Mr. Peterson said it has been designed to integrate into the existing residential area. He said it would be a combination of painted brick and masonry; it would be one story with a metal roof or clay masonry roof. Mr. Peterson said they plan a landscape buffer on the north and east side. He showed the Commission and neighbors pictures of the proposed structure. I I I Ie I RECESS Chairman Tucker called a recess at 9:00 P. M. to allow the neighbors time to look the plans over. BACK TO ORDER Chairman Tucker called the meeting back to order at 9:10 P. M. with the same members present. I I Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I Jim Bowen, 4704 Susan Lee Lane, came forward. He said he was opposed to this property being rezoned to Commercial for several reasons: 1. It would cause excessive traffic due to the design of the on/off ramps of the freeway, thus forcing patrons of this business to cut through the residential streets; 2. The lights would make it difficult to sleep at night. Hudiburg Chevrolet already creates this problem; 3. The homeowners would be surrounded by commercial property which would lessen the property value; 4. Based on the I I I Ie I I Page 15 ~ P & Z Minutes I November 17, 1983 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( instability of the economy and the erratic success of the automotive industry, it could become a car dealership graveyard. Mr. Bowen said he did not feel they should take multi-family residential property, which is more compatible with the existing development surrounding this property and change it to satisfy one man or a corporation when they could move across the highway or down the road and would already have the proper zoning. Mr. Bowen requested the Commission re-evaluate this request. Mr. Wood asked Mr. Bowen if he had rather have high density rather than security controlled commercial. Mr. Bowen said he felt mulit-family would not lessen the value of their property as much as commercial would. James M. Wilson, 4705 Susan Lee Lane, came forward. He said he was against this request. He said they have interference from Hudiburg with the PA system, the lights and the traffic. Mr. Wilson said they are residential and would like to maintain the residential atmosphere. Philip Wacaster, 4708 Susan Lee Lane, came forward. He said he opposes this request because they already have excess traffic from Hudiburg. Lynda Sutphin, 5028 Maryanna Way, came forward. She said was against this request; she is not against the commercial zoning, but is against a car dealership. Ms. Sutphin said she would be more in favor of an office building. She said it would make the traffic in the area bad and she is against this type of development. Betty Grimes, 4813 Susan Lee Lane, came forward. She said she is against this zoning request. I Page 16 ~ P & Z Minutes November 17, 1983 I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Tucker said most of the time, the car dealerships are lighted for security and this does generate a light problem for the neighborhood. He also said they do generate traffic and if they develop this property into two dealerships, it would create more traffic. Chairman Tucker said Hudiburg Chevy is obnoxious. Chairman Tucker said if this property is developed as multi-family, there would be traffic, but it would not be all night and would be considered as residential. Mr. Hannon asked the architect if there are lighting systems they could use that would keep the light off the neighborhood. Mr. Crownrich said there are a number of lighting systems they could use. He said he also feels Hudiburg is obnoxious. Mr. Crownrich said their anticipated lighting would be 3 to 4 foot candles which would be 20 to 30 feet away from the poles. He said Hudiburg's is a general aluminated system and their's would be a directional system which would be from the property line in; they would have some mounted on the buildings at 40 to 50 feet. Mr. Crownrich said this dealership would not be as large as Hudiburg. Mr. Hannon said he would request an 8 foot masonry fence as opposed to the 6 foot wood fence. Mr. Crownrich said they have previously constructed fencing out of the same masonry as the building and they would agree to this. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 83-66 subject to the fence on the east property line being 8 feet. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I Page 17 ~ P & Z Minutes November 17, 1983 PZ 83-66 DENIED 17. PS 83-117 PS 83-117 DENIED 18. PZ 83-67 ( This motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PZ 83-66 subject to installing an 8 foot masonry fence on the north and east sides and subject to the approval of a sight lighting system which would have the direct lights into the property and away from the residential property. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood. The vote was 2-3 with Nash, Bowen, and Tucker voting against. The motion failed. Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 83-66. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion to deny carried by a vote of 3-2 with Wood and Hannon voting against denial. Request of Gene Huggins for replat of Block 42C-R, Richland Terrace Addition. Mr. Bowen made the motion to ny PS 83-117. This motion wa seconded by Ms. Nash and the mot carried 5-0. Request of Robe H. Martin to rezone Tract AlA, J C. McComas Survey, Abstract qO, from its present class! cation of Agriculture to a pro sed classification of IF-12-1800 e Family Dwelling. This property is located at 7600 Hewitt Street. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Martin. He said Mr. Martin requested a building permit to enlarge his home and found it had not been zoned nor platted. Mr. Hedgcoth said they are requesting zoning compatible to the surrounding area. I " I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I G r- KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 9, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PI 83-66 M.F. and IF-9 to COMMERCIAL GRID 131, 132 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the z~ning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. I~ RWA/ra cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I (e I 4IIf MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JANUARY 23, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order January 23, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim Ramsey Jim Kenna Richard Davis J.C. Hubbard Dick Fisher Harold Newman Marie Hinkle Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Moore Rex McEntire Richard Albin Gene Riddle City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary City Attorney City Engineer Director Public Works- Utility Purchasing Agent John Whitney Press: Mark England Katherine Woodard Mid Cities Daily News Fort Worth Star Telegram 3. The invocation was given by Rev. Bill Simmons, Richland Hills Baptist Church. 4. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to approve the minutes of the January 9, 1984 meeting. Motion carried 6-0; Councilwoman Hinkle abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. None 6. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 9, 1984 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEM (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA' CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (#9, 10, 11 12, 13, 14 & 15) APPROVED I' I 7. Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Steven Harrison, Attorney, 4708 Holiday Lane, appeared before the Council representing Mr. Randy Stewart. Mr. Harrison stated that Randy and Vickie Stewart were acting agents for a Texas Corporation, Dunway Oil Company. Mr. Harrison stated the Stewart's wanted to sell beer only for off-premise consumption only. Mr. Harrison stated that Randy Stewart did own and operate Randy's Handimart. Mr. Harrison stated the Planning and Zoning Commission heard this case and determined that the application met all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Harrison stated the question was not whether or not beer should be sold, it was not a moral question before the Council. Mr. Harrison stated there were approximately six places in close range of the Randy's that had permits to sell beer. Mr. Harrison stated the issue did not pertain to the use of alcohol. Mr. Harrison stated the question was whether the governing body would abide by the Zoning Ordinance and the applicant had complied with the ordinance. Mr. Harrison stated the other question was whether everyone would be treated equal. Mr. Harrison stated the use was compatible, there were no dangers, the Council would hear concerns about a school being near, traffic and litter. Mr. Harrison stated this was not the issue. Councilman Hubbard asked whose individual name the permit would be issued in. Mr. Harrison stated the permit would be in the name of Randy and Vickie Stewart. Councilman Hubbard asked if they would be the managers of the store. Mr. Harrison stated yes, the Stewarts owned the stock. Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Harrison if he was aware that if the Stewart's sold the store the Specific Use would automatically be removed. Mr. Harrison stated yes. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Mr. L.C. Barnett, Smithfield Road, appeared before the Council. January 23, 1984 Page 2 PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-68, REQUEST OF RANDY STEWART TO REZONE LOT 1, BLOCK 31, COLLEGE HILL ADDITION FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO LOCAL RETAIL-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION (LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND SMITHFIELD ROAD) I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ January 23, 1984 Page 3 Mr. Barnett stated he would suggest that there was a consider- able difference between this location and some of the other locations that were mentioned that were currently selling alcoholic beverages. Mr. Barnett stated the other locations were not directly in front of residences. Mr. Barnett stated the other locations had better access. Mr. Barnett stated that by the admission of the Council for the applicant, there were plenty of places in close proximity of this location for the citizens of North Richland Hills to buy alcoholic beverages. Mr. Barnett stated there was a problem with litter and hazards, as far as access to the location. Mr. Barnett stated there had been a number of accidents at this location. Mr. Barnett requested the Council deny this request. Mr. Barnett stated it would devalue his property if granted. Mr. Dawain Klopfenstein, Pastor of College Hill Assembly of God Church, appeared before the Council. Mr. Klopfenstein stated this was a hazardous intersection and the sale of beer would bring more traffic. Mr. Klopfenstein stated that the traffic had tripled in the last five years at this intersection. Mr. Klopfenstein stated there were at lease six other places to buy alcoholic beverages and he felt that was sufficient. Mr. Klopfenstein stated there had been countless accidents at this intersection. Mr. Joe Barnett, 6000 Davis Boulevard, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barnett stated that it had been determined that his property was not within 200 feet of the property requesting the zoning change to have been personally notified of the Planning and Zoning Meeting. Mr. Barnett stated his property was across the street, diagonal from this property. Mr. Barnett stated it was hazardous to try and get on Davis Boulevard because of the traffic. Mr. Barnett stated the question the Council was addressing was one concerning the police powers of the City. Mr. Barnett stated the Statues of the State of Texas gave Municipalities the right, the authority and responsibility to protect the interest of the citizens. Mr. Barnett stated the safety and welfare of the community was the question. Mr. Barnett stated he would like to point out that the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council recently approved the 4th filing of Sunny Meadows Addition, which would bring two major streets on Davis adjoining Randy Stewart's. Mr. Barnett stated there were already a number of accidents at this location. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. I' I Ie I 1 I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ 8. Mayor Faram advised the Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval of the request, however, there was a legal petition against the request and would require a 3/4 majority vote of the total Council. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to approve PZ 83-68, Ordinance No. 1085, permit to be in the name of Randy and Vickie Stewart and non-transferable. Councilman Hubbard stated he had heard the words signs, traffic, litter and previous danger and those problems seem to presently exist at the location. Councilman Hubbard stated that it had been stated that numerous location other than this location sold beer. Councilman Hubbard stated that he certainly intended to be as fair as possible to everyone in the City. Councilman Hubbard stated that the request before the Council had met all the legal requirements for Specific Use for selling of alcoholic beverages and he saw no reason to spend all the citizens or taxpayers money in court to contest a suit, if brought by the applicant, that the City could not win. Councilman Hubbard stated he had, over a period of time, seen numerous suits where the applicant's were legally entitled to sell alcoholic beverages, the City refused the permit, and the applicant won the suit. Therefore he made the motion to approve in trying to save tax money, because the City had not been able to win a suit in the past. . Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Faram advised the Council that two items, by emergency, had been added to the Agenda. Resolution of Glenview Drive would be item #16. *9. *10. January 23, 1984 Page 4 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-68 ORDINANCE NO. 1085 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION CASTING A JOINT BALLOT FOR TML BOARD OF TRUSTEES ELECTION APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTING BID FOR 7,050 TONS OF FLEX BASE AND 250 TONS AGGREGATE APPROVED I- I Ie I 'I I rJ I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. January 23, 1984 Page 5 *11. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #9, FINAL, TO STOLARUK CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,140.91 - NORTH HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *12. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #10, FINAL, TO STOLARUK CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,173.14 - HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *13. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT J ESTIMATE #2, TO M&D CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,125.20 - MORGAN MEADOWS WEST, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *14. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #11, TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,136.78 - SNOW HEIGHTS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT: APPROVED *15. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE 117, TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,248.43 - RUFE SNOW DRIVE, PHASE II APPROVED I' I Ie I 'I .1 .~ I III Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ 16. Mr. McEntire stated there had been two changes in the resolution: Section 4, second line, the word acquiring added before needed easements. Section 6, changed to read: this resolution supercedes any prior agreements and is void after three years from this date unless all right-of-way has been purchased and construction has begun. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he would like to thank Mayor Faram for his time and efforts put forth on the project. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that for the benefit of everyone that was not aware of what had been going on, North Richland Hills had a contract that was signed by a past Mayor of the City with the Mayor of Richland Hills, that basically stated that on the Glenview project there would be a 70-30 split. The City of North Richland Hills paying 70% and Richland Hills paying 30%. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that the portion of Glenview Drive the contract pertained to was situated in the city limits of Richland Hills. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated the contract had not set well with this Council because they did not feel North Richland Hills should be building streets in other cities. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated the City of North Richland Hills passed a Resolution and set it to Richland Hills stating that even though North Richland Hills was not in agreement with the 70%-30%, the city would go 50%-50%. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated the City of Richland Hills turned the Resolution down and since that time Mayor Faram and several of the Staff members had been working vigorously not to lose the State funding that was available for developing Glenview Drive. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated the resolution being considered tonight in effect, will have North Richland Hills paying 70% of the drainage but beyond that each city will care for its own cost. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated that because Richland Hills apparently did not have all the funding they needed to enter into this project, the business community had come up with $21,866 which they have provided to North Richland Hills to help Richland Hills incur their cost. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he thought the reason this project was progressing was because of the Mayor of North Richland Hills. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated that some of the Council members still believed that this was not a good agreement for the citizens of North Richland Hills and some of the members, like himself, believe that a citizen could come forward and stop the whole project as North Richland Hills was spending money in the City of Richland Hills. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he would like to again thank the Mayor and Staff for all the time and efforts that had January 23, 1984 Page 6 GLENVIEW DRIVE RESOLUTION NO. 84-4 APPROVED I' I Ie I 'I .1 , I I Ie I I I 16a. I I I I Ie I ~ been put into the project, and again, North Richland Hills had no assurance that the City of Richland Hills would accept the Resolution before the Council tonight. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated he felt Richland Hills had misjudged the cost of acquiring the right-of-way and that was one reason North Richland Hills had a date tied to the Resolution, if passed, that would become null and void three years from today's date, which would clear up some of the things North Richland Hills inherited because of the past contract. Councilman Kenna stated he shared Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey's thoughts on not being sure that the contract before the Council was totally in the best interest of North Richland Hills, but when you look at the alternatives of losing all of the State funding and keeping Glenview Drive a two-lane road that was very difficult to go down, even though it is not part of North Richland Hills, as far as real estate, it was highly traveled by North Richland Hills citizens and would provide rear access to North Hills Mall, which was in the process of some expansion. Councilman Kenna stated that he felt that if the resolution was approved and successful with Richland Hills accepting it, there would be a thoroughfare instead of a small road and the additional cost would end up benefiting North Richland Hills citizens. Mayor Faram stated Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey had been very gracious in giving credit for the progress made, but he had made no mention at all that he had spent five or six evenings in debates in trying to reach a solution to this matter. Mayor Faram stated that on behalf of the Council he would like to express his appreciation to Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey. Motion to approve carried 7-0. Mr. McEntire stated the City had previously made an offer to Mr. Louis Engler on 28.8 acres of land f~r the purpose of constructing a drainage project, a City complex for the purpose of providing fire-fighting services, public utility services and public street services. Mr. McEntire stated Mr. Engler turned the offer down at that time, and in the mean time Mr. Engler had passed away and the property was put into an estate. Mr. McEntire stated this resolution authorized him to proceed with eminent domain proceedings. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Resolution 84-5. Councilman Fisher asked why the property had to be condemned. January 23, 1984 Page 7 RESOLUTION ON EMINENT DOMAIN RESOLUTION NO. 84-5 APPROVED I" I Ie I 'I .J 'I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I "'If Mr. McEntire stated that Mr. Engler would not sell the property because he would have to pay a capital gain tax on it. Mr. McEntire stated that Mr. Engler was terminally ill at the time the City made the offer and the Engler heirs thought that if the property went into an estate they would not have to pay any capital gain, so they would not sell the property. Motion carried 7-0. 17. None 18. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of January 23, 1983. January 23, 1984 Page 8 CITIZEN PRESENTATIO] ADJOURNMENT Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I <6 ORDINANCE NO. J~\ ~ 1 (v AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 83-66 the following described property shall not be rezoned from Multi-Family and IF-9 to Commercial, C-2. BEING a tract of land in the Richland Terrace Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being recorded as follows: Block 42-C, Richland Terrace Addition, Volume 388-60, Page 146, and Lot 21R, Block 5, Richland Terrace Addition, Volume 388-10, Page 79, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas This property is located on the north side of Northeast Loop 820 Frontage Road and bounded on the west by Cloyce Drive. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 17th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1983. ~ ~~:~~ia~in~~ ~ommission ;;... /¿--.<, _.~.,J-,:,' , "-,~ -<.,. ~)A/ /J. ¡,,/ / v- " ,/ " , " - > ~ t» d.:.0-t~ Secretary, ~~n~¡ng ~ Zoning Commission BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.PZ-83-66 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1984. Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Rex McEntire, City Attorney I· I e I I I DATE: 1 February 13. 1984 SUBJECT: Appeal Hearing - 83-54 - M & W Investm~nt~ DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: Council granted an appeal hearin~ on December 9. 1981 for thi~ request to be heard on Januarv 9. 198~. One COlfficil WP~bPT w~s ah~PDr rhpTPfoTP the applicant asked for the hearine to b~ postponed, Ihp TeQllP~r i~ fOT a billboard at Loop 820 and the railroad track. e CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approv~/Di~~pprove e BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: NO N/A ,,, Air /' ( /l ~¿~:~ I I IL-- - - .~ ----- ,--- " '-, , /'" 1 C 1'ë. .\-!f, Ih . F. , L.1t.. To CO,",", ,. ,.". flt IF:' , -1.4-'" \ \ \ --- I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Bred L. Wilemon Robert Vv. Mahoney A' ,V M & W Investn1ents November 23, 1983 Ms. Jeanette Moore City Secretary City of North Rich1and Hills P.o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Ms. Moore, Thank you for your patience in our request for the postponement made October 24. I have had an opportunity to talk with Mr. Line, and have my questions answered. We are now ready for our appeal to be heard. I will await notification for when it is to be placed on the agenda. Once again, thank you for your patience and consideration. Sincerely, M & W ADVERTISING, INC. C;::::l'ÆJ~ C. Kirk Nance CKN:klb M . W Advert'alng, Inc. · M . W Development Co. . ExServ Co. 1211 South Bowen, Suite 212 · Arlington, Texas 76013 . 817/265-7095 /461-1600 l- Ie 7. I I 1 I II I I I' I I I I I I I Ie I ~ ( Mayor Faram advised the Council he had a request from the applicant to postpone this request. Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if the applicant would have to request a hearing date. Mr. McEntire stated yes. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to postpone action on this item. Motion carried 7-0. 8. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to postpone this item. Motion carried 7-0. 9. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. Mr. Thomas Elting, representing Dr. Anderson, appeared before the Council. Mr. Elting stated he was present to answer any questions the Council might have. Mayor Faram stated he had a meeting with Dr. Anderson and Mr. Elting and was under the impression that the Enginee had not finished his work as submitted with the plans, an yet later as researched, by the Staff and City Enginee every- thing had been satisfied. Mr. Elting stated that every care of. Mr. Elting stated he understood getting approval from the State water line on Davis Boulevard. problem in extend the Mr. Albin stated that it s his understanding that Dr. Anderson's engineer ha approached the State for the permit. Mr. Elting stated ey had contacted the State and the permit for the ater line and drive approach would be issued prior to co ruction. Mr. AI· stated that if the permits were in hand before uction began he would have no objections. r. Line asked if there would be anything to restrict the 8' main from going forward as far as the cost and engineering. Page 2 October 24, 1983 PLANNING & ZONING- PUBLIC HEARING- APPEAL HEARING - PZ 83-54, REQUEST OF M & W INVESTMENT TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 4, T.K. AKERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 19, FROM AGRICULTURE TO INDUSTRIAL (LOCATED ON THE RAIL- ROAD PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NORTH- EAST LOOP 820) POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-54 POSTPONED PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL HEAR PS 83-101 EQUEST OF DR. D. ANDERSON FOR FIN LAT OF LOT 1, B K It D.J. DERSON SUBDIVISION (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF SHADY GROVE ROAD) I· ( J?1tTE: October 20, 1983 IrBJE~~ I' .' I I DEP ARTMENT : BACKG~OUND: Loop 820. PZ 83-54 Appeal Hearing for Zoning Request from Agriculture to Industrial on a portion of Tract 4, T. Akers Survey" Abstract 19 Planning and Zonin~ This riro?ertv' is located on the railroad ~roDertv on the north side of Northeast .., I 1 I· I Ie I I I I I There was only one property owner contacted and there was no one who spoke in opposition. M & W Investments wish to install a billboard o~ this property. Their metes and bounds description shows the pròperty in question to extend to the middle of the roadway. The property is not platted. The Planning and Zoning Co~ission had a motion to approve this reque~t with the stipulation they provide the City Staff with a revised plat, b~t the mòtion failed to pa~ for a lack of a majority.vote. The vÐte was 2-2 with Mr. Bowen and Ms. Nash voting against approval. CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning ·request. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: ~/A I I I" I ------------------~------------------------------------------~~--~~--- I· 1 I I I I Photo Sheet 1 Northeastern view of surrounding area Northwestern view of surrounding area Western view of surrounding area I ': .:~~~.~-r~~- " . .í.~i~~~·:,:":· I : ~~~~.. --,~~ W: <t - I" . -- 1m .. ~...-.._<r .......... T'~'t~'.~~r-~' - , I .. ;,t.;..~~7~~r~~ .~.'.:.:( r:-.t.1.3j..¡~. .. _# ._ ~ ~*f~'{:' I . ~..¿ . ---:~::~~-_. ..~.. I .~.~ Photo Sheet 2 Southwestern view of surrounding area Southern view of surrounding area Southeastern view of surrounding area I Ie I I I I fl I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I It) ORDINANCE NO. (if . ",' " Il 1) IY\)~ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-54 the following described property shall NOT BE rezoned from Agriculture to Industrial. BEING a tract of land in the T. Ackers Survey, Tarrant County, Texas, said tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the centerline intersection of the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas Mt. Pleasant to Ft. Worth main tract and Interstate Highway 820: THENCE West, along the centerline of Interstate Highway 820, 58.795 feet to the Place of Beginning proper for this description; THENCE North 31 degrees 33 minutes East along the westerly St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company property line, 500 feet; THENCE East, 117.59 feet; THENCE South 31 degrees 33 minutes West, along the easterly St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas property line, 500 feet; THENCE West, 117.58 feet the the Place of Beginning property, containing 1.15 acres of land, more or less. I Ie I I I I I I Page 2 This property is located on the railroad property on the north side of Northeast Loop 820. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 25th DAY OF AUGUST, 1983. ¿£J~c ~r CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7?J ~~ Gf! t¿;~ SECRETARY P~NG AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-83-54 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1983. Ie I I I I II I Ie I I MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I Ie I 'I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 1 ( City of j\{8rth Richland Hills, Texas TO: Rodger Line City Manager DATE: February 8, 1984 FROM: Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Platting cases to be heard by City Council February 13, 1984 PS 83-125 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Wayne Steward for final plat of Blocks 13 thru 25, Fox Hollow Addition. PS 84-1 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of B & M Development Company for final plat of Kingswood Estates, Section 3. PS 84-2 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Jack Cook for final plat of Lots 5 & 6, Block 1, Mollie B. Collins Addition. PS 84-9 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of David Barfield for final plat of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition. PS 84-10 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of YMCA & Muhsen Shabout for replat of Lots 2R, 3R, & 4R, Block 11, Emerald Hills Addition. PS 84-11 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of B & B Development Company for replat of Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition. PS 84-12 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of M-W Development Company for replat of Lots 3R thru 14R, Block 42A, Richland Terrace Addition. PS 84-13 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of U-Tex Development Company for replat of Lots lR-l & lR-2, Block 6, Industrial Park Addition. PS 84-15 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Service Centers of America for replat of Lots lR thru 4R, Block 5 Industrial Park Addition. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118 I· I, p- I I I I I I Ie I ,I I I :1 'I I Ie iI I DATE: February 8, 1984 /1 I SUBJECT: PS 83-125 Final Plat of Blocks 13 thru 25, Fox Hollow Addition DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Chapman Road and bounded on the west by Richf ield Park. There bas been many problems with this property, and according to Richard Albin's letter of February 7th. there are still problems. The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the plat on December 15th, reconsidered it on January 26th, denied it again, but reconvened the meeting and recommended approval subject to the Engineer's comments and the staff's comments and that both parties reach an agreement regarding ·the road situation and the drainage. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of final plat. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x JÚ~~ ( L ,1. I e. I \~-~ AG ,I \ 1\ I' I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I -I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas I-ebruary 7, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-832, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOX HOLLOW ADDITION, BLOCKS 13-25, REVISED CONST. PLANS, PS 83-125, GRID 77 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would refer you to comments in our review letters dated December 6 and 15, 1983, and Jan. 8, 1984 PS 83-125, IIFox Hollow Adn.lI, Final Plat, regarding water and sewer prorata, street escrow considerations, and other comments pertaining to this platting. 2. Questions have surfaced regarding the adequacy of the topographic contours used in the drainage plan for this development. We would note that the city topo maps could be in error one to two feet in some places due to the errors created by plotting contours over the top of grass rather than natural ground -- a problem inherent in photogrametric topographic mapping methods and techniques. Therefore, city maps are suitable for establishing drainage flow patterns and delineating drainage area divides in general, but are usually not suitable for final construction grades. The developer's engineer has indicated that the topo shown in the construction plans is based on actual field survey data. Also the Engineer's certification statement affixed to the drainage plan states that the the topo information used is suitable for developing a workable drainage plan. 3. Another question has been brought to our attention regarding the adequacy of breaking sight distance on Chapman Road at the top of the hill near the intersection of Fox Hollow Lane. Technically, stopping sight distance is measured from the driver's eye, 3.75 feet above pavement to the top of an object six inches high on the pavement. For a 40 mph road, the minimum acceptable stopping sight distance is 275 feet and the desirable distance is 300 feet. The available stopping sight distance on Chapman Road for a vehicle February 7, 1984 PS 83-125 PAGE 1 !S!SO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I· I ~ I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ , traveling west and approaching the crest of the hill at station 15+00, as shown on sheet no. 8 of the plans, is only about 200 feet. In order to achieve the minimum stopping sight distance required by A.A.S.H.T.O. standards, a cut of about 2.5 feet off the top of the hill is necessary, and the proposed 50-foot vertical curve at the top of the hill should be increased to about a 500 or 600 foot curve. The other alternative is to require the developer to shift the proposed location of Fox Hollow Lane eastward to the top of the hill, which would alter the proposed lot layouts. We would note that requiring the developer to lower Chapman Road at the hill might also necessitate the lowering of some utilities which would no longer have the required minimum cover. 4. Since some questions may remain regarding the adequacy of the proposed lot sizes for some apparently marginal lots in this development, we would suggest that the developer's engineer be prepared to present calculations to you which verify that all lots meet the minimum area requirements. 5. Drop sanitary sewer manhole connections should be provided at the following locations: (a) Chapman Road, Station 9+20, (b) Chapman Road, Station 16+75, Little Ranch Road, Station 6+16, (c) Little Ranch Road, Station 9+29.5, (d) Jamie Renee Lane, Station 0+00, Jamie Renee Lane, Station 17+71.1, and any other locations where the connection drop exceeds two feet. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician February 7, 1984 PS 83-125 PAGE 2 I I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,: ( Barnett Teames & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers-Planners-Designers February 6, 1984 Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills P.o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: BTA Job No.=83-0124 Fox Hollow Addition Blocks 13 Thru 25 Dear Mrs. Calvert, Pursuant to the last Planning and Zoning meeting concering the drainage si tuation with Fox Hollow Subdivision, we have made some minor corrections to the plans. We deem that the drainage has been revised to the satisfaction of the P & Z Commission. We have checked with the Corp. of Engine- ers on the 100 year flood data, which is stated on the plans. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, ,#~ pø~ Phil~~Barnett, P.E. BARNETT TEAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. PB/bb P.o. Box 1485 e Mineral Wells, Texas 76067 e (817) 325-9417 I I r- I I I I I I ( Ie I I I I I I I Ie I P & Z Minu tes,. January 26, 1 , . PZ 84-10 APPROVED 1. PS 83-125 Denied 12/15/83 PS 83-125 DENIED 2. PS 84-1 , Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. /' State Representativ Charles Evans came forward to present Mid City Pizza. He sa! this property is already zone C-I and the restaurant is alread open. Mr. Evans said they need an/åpproval for liqour license which·/would be in the name of Dan / Colé. Mr. Wood asked how many other Specific Uses were there along Rufe Snow. Mr. Evans said there were probably three. He said their main business would be the sale of pizza. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 84-10. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Wayne Steward for reconsideration of the final plat of Blocks 13 thru 25, Fox Hollow Addition. Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny this plat without prejudice since the plans have not been reviewed by the City Engineer. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion to deny carried 5-0. Request of B & M Developme for final plat 0 swood Additio ction 3. Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 84-1 because the plans are incomplete. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash. PZ 84-9 APPROVED I 21. PS 84-5 I PS 84-5 APPROVED I I I I I~ ADJOURNMENT I BACK TO ORDER I I I I I I Ie I I Page 16 P & Z Minutes ~ January 26, 1984 - Mr. Bowen made the motion to rove PZ 84-9. This motion was conded by Ms. Nash and the motion rried 5-0. Request of Charle . Rutledge for Short Form PIa of Lot 2, Block 13, Meadowview ates. H on made the motion to approve -5. This motion was seconded by Nash. Mr. Bronstad said they already have water and sewer on the property, but if they need additional coverage, they will be required to pay pro rata. Mr. Bronstad sai! they will be required to sign a covenant or escrow money for both Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road. The motion to approve PS 84-5 carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:15 P. M. Chairman Tucker called the meeting back to order at 9:40 P. M. with the same members and staff present. MS. Nash made the motion to reconsider item HI, PS 83-125. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Tucker said the Commission, in denying this plat, was trying to protect the city and the public, but after discussing the matter and hearing both sides, the Commission has decided, since we do have a City Engineer and Staff to over see the needed changes, to reconsider so the plat may go on to the City Council. I I ~ I I I I I Page 17 P & Z Minutes 48¿ January 26, 1984 . ( Chairman Tucker said he would recommend the Commission approve the plat conditionally, subject to the Engineer's comments and the staff's comments and that both parties reach an agreement regarding the road situation and the drainage. PS 83-125 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 83-125 subject to the above stipulations. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:50 P. M. ( Ie I I II I I I I Ie I CHAIRMAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION I I W- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~ ~ ~ Barnett Teames & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers-Planners-Designers January 12, 1984 Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills P.o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 RE: Fox Hollow Addition Blocks 13 Thru 25 BTA Job No.=83-0l24 Dear Mrs. Calvert, The following comments are in response to Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. letter dated January 8, 1984. ITEM 1. The building lines on the cu-de-sac's of blocks 14, 15, 23, 24, and 25 have been revised to a uniform 25 foot. The cul-de-sac in Block 13 is 30 feet and tapers into the 25 foot building line as requested by the Public Works Director. The lots meet or exceed the minimum zoning requirements such as front, rear and side yards. ITEM 2. Lot 18A has been included in Lot 18 and meets the zoning requirements as to area and set backs. ITEM 3. The intersection of Dana Lane with Fox Hollow Lane has been shifted to the south to align with Teresa Court. ITEM 4. The front yard on Andrea Court of Lot 6, Block 23 has been changed to a uniform 25' building line. ITEM 5. One lot has been taken out of each cul-de-sac area to that the lots meet all requirements such as front side yard and rear yard, and area. insure yard, P.o. Box 1485 e Mineral Wells, Texas 76067 e (817) 325-9417 I ~ ,.' . · . I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~ , " Page 2 January 12, 1984 Wanda Calvert, Planning & Zoning Coordinator ITEM 6. A note has been added to the Utility Layout sheet that states that the proposed water and sewer lines in Little Ranch Road are to be connected to the existing utilities along the south line of this development. ITEM 7. The location of all proposed sewer taps are shown and noted on the Utility Sheet. ITEM 8. Single water taps have been provided for Lots 3 and 4 of Block 23. This addresses all of the comments in the above mentioned letter and the plans have been changed accordingly. I have met with the City's staff and reviewed the plans and believe they reflect what the City has indicated. We ask for approval of the plat and if there are any discrepancy we ask that the plat be approved contingent upon correction of any discrepancies. Sincerely, PB/bb cc: Wayne Steward I I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~ ,. ( ( K NOWL TON-E NG II SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 ;> Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-832, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOX HOLLOW ADDITION, BLOCKS 13-25, REVISED FINAL PLAT, PS 83-125, GRID 77 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: The Public Works Department has requested that the following items be noted for your consideration: 1. The building lot lines on all cul-de-sacs should be uniform. However, we have not found any specific provision in the Zoning Ordinance which would preclude the use of staggered building setback lines if the minimum setback complies with the requirements of the Ordinance, and if the side and rear yard mimimum requirements are fulfilled. In fact, Article XXV, Exceptions and Variances, Section II, Front Yard, paragraph D. states that ... such building line provides a front yard of 25 feet or more in depth and a side yard of 10 feet or more in depth and is part of a comprehensive plan for orderly development of a subdivision, either with a uniform or "staggered building line", no building shall be erected closer to the street than the building lines so shown... This reference to "staggered building line" would seem to imply acceptance of this practice under certain conditions. In any event, the developer's engineer should be required to demonstrate that all other zoning requirements are fulfilled for each lot that has a front yard setback greater than the minimum prescribed for this zoning. We would refer this item to the City Attorney for comment. 2. Lot 18A, block 18, has a side yard fronting on Fox Hollow Lane with a front yard on Dana Lane less than the zoning requirements for this development. We would suggest that lot 18 be enlarged to include lot 1SA. 3. The intersection of Dana Lane with Fox Hollow Lane should be shifted to the south to align with Teresa Court. January 8, 1984 PS 83-125 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I \ A- t ~ 4. The front yard on Andrea Court of lot 6, Block 23, should be uniformly 25 feet, or a front yard on Little Ranch Road instead of on Andrea Court should be considered. 5. All of the following lots appear to be in nonconformity based on minimum area, front yard, side yard or rear yard requirements: Lot 5, Block 13; Lot 17, Block 13; Lot 9, Block 14; Lot 21, Block 15; Lot 1BA, Block 18; Lots 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 of Block 23; Lot 6, Block 24; and Lot 10, Block 25. The developer1s engineer should be prepared to demonstrate that each of these lots conforms to all minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. A note should be provided on the Utility Layout Sheet which states that the proposed water and sewer lines in Little Ranch Road are to be connected to the existing utilities along the south line of this development. 7. The location of all proposed sewer taps should be shown or noted on the Utility Layout Sheet. 8. Two (2) single water services should be provided for lots 3 and 4 of block 23 since a double water service should not be located on an easement between two lots. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. £¿~, RICHARD w. ALBIN, P.E. , RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PAGE 2 PS 83-125 1-', I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,.. ~ Barnett Teames & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers-Planners-Designers December 20, 1983 Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Fox Hollow Addition Blocks 13 Thru 25 BTA Job No. 83-0124 Dear Mrs. Calvert, The following comments are in response to Knowl ton-English-Flowers, Inc. letter dated December 15, 1983. Item 1. Please refer to BARNETT TEAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. letter dated December 14, 1983, in answer to the prorate comments. Item 2. Jamie Renee Lane and Edinburg Drive have been made to align properly so there will not be an offset in the street aligment. Edinburg Drive has been changed to Jamie Renee Lane to match the extension of the name from the adjoining Subdivision. Item 3. Mr. Gene Riddle, Public Works Director, called on December 19, 1983, and asked that the street names stay as submitted reflecting cul-de-sac names be different from the through streets. Item 4. The lots stated in the letter dated December 15, 1983, have been changed to the required 8,000 square foot minimum area. All cul-de-sac lots meet or exceed the minimum required area of 8,000 square feet for IF-8 zoning. Attached is a list of all cul-de-sac lots wi th their respective area in square feet. P.o. Box 1485 e Mineral Wells, Texas 76067 e (817) 325-9417 .Þ , I I ,. I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2-December¡ao.), 1983 Wanda Calvert ~ The revisions should correct all previous questions that have concerning Fox Hollow Addition. If there are any questions, call. arisen please Sincerely, Phil BAR J. Barnett, P.E. TT TEAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. PB/bb cc: Wayne Steward Richard Albin, Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Gene Riddle-City of North Richardson Hills I ~ ATTACHMENT I ~ The following are lots around the cuI-de .:;ac showing the I square feet in each lot. BLOCK LOT AREA(S.F. ) p- 13 3 8,680 I 4 8,320 5 10,470 I 6 8,274 7 10,547 8 8,126 I 9 8,243 14 7 8,401 I 8 8,144 9 10,764 I 10 8,521 11 11,064 I 12 8,332 13 8,130 15 19 8,248 Ie 20 8,871 21 8,220 I 22 9,696 23 10,351 I 24 8,479 25 8,483 I 23 I 8,198 2 8,108 3 8,069 I 4 9,974 5 8,244 I 24 2 8,178 3 8,570 I 4 9,361 5 8,329 I 6 9,356 7 8,569 Ie s 8,167 I ·. ., . I· I BLOCK 25 W- I I 22 I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,. ATTACHMENT I CONT. LOT 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 .'" ARMCS.F. ) 8,178 8,570 9,361 8,329 9,356 8,569 8,167 8,023 I f." · .. I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~ ~ r ! I i I ~ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS DECEMBER 15, 1983 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:30 P. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Member AI t. Member Councilman Asst. Dir. U P & Z Co äinator Georg ucker Ma orie Nash on Bowen John Schwinger Richard Davis Allen Bronstad Wanda Calvert Mark Hannon Mark Wood CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 17, 1983 Ms. Nash made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. 1. Request of Southland Financial Services for final plat of Foster Village Addition, Section eleven. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 83-124. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 2. PS 83-125 Request of Wayne Steward for final plat of Blocks 13 thru 25, Fox Hollow Addition. Chairman Tucker said after reviewing this plat, the Commission has some problems with this plat. Phillip Barnett with Barnett Teames & Associates came forward to represent Mr. Steward. Chairman Tucker asked why they changed the names of the Courts on the final plat. Mr. Barnett stated it was at the suggestion of the Public Works Director. 1.' . . ~ I W- I I I 1 I 1 Ie I I I I I 1 I Ie I Page 2 P & Z Minutes December 15. 1983 ~ ( Chairman Tucker stated there were off-sets on the streets '~ana Lane and Teresa Court" and asked why. Mr. Barnett said that was the way the preliminary plat was approved. Chairman Tucker stated there were some 15 lots which do not have the required 8.000 square feet. Mr. Barnett said he would look into that and could easily change them. , Councilman Davis stated they need verification that all lots have 60 foot frontage. Mr. Barnett said he would take care of that. Mr. Bronstad said Edenburg Drive and Jamie Lane in the subdivision to the east do not line up. Mr. Barnett said that could be changed. PS 83-125 DENIED Mr. Bowen said he did not feel that this final plat was ready so he made the motion to deny PS 83-125. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion to deny carried 4-0. 3. PS 83-126 Request of Jack S. Cook for preliminary plat of Lots 5 & 1. Mollie B. Collins Addit Mr. Bowen made t otion to approve PS 83-126. s motion was seconded by Mr. winger and the motion ed 4-0. Councilman Davis said they should have stated they would waive items 4 and 5 of the City Engineer's letter. MS. Nash made the motion to reopen PS 83-126. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. I I w- I I I I I I Ie I I II I I I I Ie ~ ... , ~ ~ KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 15, 1983 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-832, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOX HOLLOW ADDITION, BLOCKS 13-25, REVISED CONST. PLANS, PS 83-125, GRID 77 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would refer you to comments in our review letter dated December 6, 1983, PS 83-125, IIFox Hollow Adn.lI, Final Plat, regarding water and sewer prorata, street escrow considerations, and other comments pertaining to the plat itself. Although revised construction plans have been submitted for our review, the revised plat is not included in the materials transmitted to our office today. 2. Attached is a xerox copy of a composit map which we prepared showing a portion of Fox Hollow, Blocks 12-25, and Fox Hollow, 2nd Addition. taped together, which reveals an apparent offset in the alignment of Edinburg Drive and Jamie Lane. Note that the depth of Lot 18, Block 16, is 100.86 feet and the depth of Lot 1, Block 4, is 125.0 feet. The offset error thus appears to be about 24.14 feet. We would suggest that a revision of Lots 17 and 18 of Block 16, and Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 15 would be required to properly align the streets. Also we would recoßl11end that the name IIEdinburg Drivell be changed to IIJamie Lanell to match Fox Hollow, 2nd Filing. 3. Some concern has been expressed by the Public Works Department that the the street names IIKimberly Courtll, "Teresa Courtll, and "Doris Courtll, could cause confusion since they are essentially extensions of "Sean Drivell, IIDana Lanell, and IISteward Lanell," respectively. We would therfore recol1l11end that these streets be renamed "Sean Court", "Dana Courtll, and IISteward Courtll. 4. As requested by the Public Works Department, we have checked the area on a number of lots in this development to determine if any of them are below the required 8,000 square feet minimum for 1F-8 December 15, 1983 PS 83-125 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 8,7/283-621,· METRO/267-3367 I I ~ I I I I I -I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~ ~ ~ ~ Zoning. Coordinate geometry calculations are attached for your infonmation along with a computer generated plot of the lots checked. The following lots appear to have less than the minimum required 8,000 square feet: Lot 9, Block 13; Lot 5, Block 13; Lot 20, Block 15; Lot 1, Block 22; Lots 2 and 3, Block 23; Lots 2,3,7 and 8, Block 24; and Lots 6,7, 11, and 12, Block 25. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician December 15, 1983 PS 83-125 PAGE 2 I I W- I I I I I I Ie I, I I I I I I Ie ~, .--... . . ,- I ..- . -- , .. . ~ , .,.. . " ...,..""1:" nD -Pc... _______ _ _ ___ McCOMAS SUBDIVISION VOL. 388-90. PG. sa N f0- E \oW W "'" '" Q: ~ Þ- V) cr 0 ..J S >- ..J ~ LI.I CD Q: ct ct ~ CD 1.00 7Õ~0 70.00 70.00 25' BUILDING LINE I~ 8 6 5 4 :3 2 .~ ~ @, .- ),00 70.00 70.00 70.00 61. 00 61.00 61.00 61.00 12 13 14 15 25' BUILDING LINE ~-~~--. 61.00 6.. 00 61.00 61.00 ~DJNB()f<G- DRIVE 61.00 -- 8 ~- 61.00 --- " I I r- 'I I I I' . I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MADE ... U.S.A. ~ ~ 24 23 L, 2 "/ .ßr IS, I' ~ Z 'fa S.¡:tJ .. ' ~:) C" ,- , o o o m o o o 00 o o o "- ((.'ô/ S, Z ~ 7//00 $',,¡:'. \ 26\ 29 31 L,Z'-J ß. IS I~ ~oo3 $,F, næ I I I -30.00 -20.00 -10.00 X-EAST/WEST -10' COGO TABLE NAME: CGC011 p S 8 3 - 1 2 5 " FOX H 0 L LOW, LOT ARE A S C H E C K 1 2 / 1 5 / 8 3 R 'W A o o o (0 , (,,8, ¿, /~ 8 f.2/ ~,r, I - o -0 wo o L/') :r: ..... ::) °0 (/')0 "' . :r:~ ..... 0::: o z Ig >- . o P') L, 2 I 8" 2. '3 7, løz I S,r, I.. I'll e,/¢. ---~ q 013 S,r. ., 108 o o o (\J L, ~ ß,13 ~ Z97 s:r: o o o gl å' , '-.9, B.,a 7,/48 S.F. o o o - 1-60. DO I -so. DO I -40.00 ,--' 1 5 4 \ / + *1 J I \ )1 '. 12 7 -.. \ I 4 1\ 's' J ~ 2 I -0.00 I 1D.DD I 2D.00 CALIFORNIA COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC. ANAHEIM, C~LlF - - ---.-..- - -- -- I I I ' . I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ie ~, .-.~ ~ ... I t._, . '. ~ . . 114t....' I tfWl\ ~ ,,~t 1:1 ~ r _...(tlS I(JbO)NfdUtOGOFIL~S)J_~031~.~ -.- -.-- -_____._, __, _____ __._____.__._______ ___._.___ I 'I ............ .......... ................... ........ ..... .... ..... ...... ..... ......... ..... ... .... ...... ...... .................... ..... . ,__-, ..... ..,........ ...... ..... ... ~............. ........ ............. ,... ..... ...,....... ~-'-"" .....,. t_·,·.~,.. .t.".,.,!,. ~ ..."...".......... t" ~., "..J"---_. · ...·r---wwww__w..__w. www_____.,__________ _____ ·:1 : =:.. ~: : I ',---- IliWk'W __ W W.W ...owwww _ __ __._._.__________ · ww wwww w ,. w w "'OW WW tit W -.---w__.. w.._ w.w_._w__________. , - :, . tll-_______ _______________ ________ .. ,. · ww ww.AI www www www w www wwww ww www www WNW .. _W_,_w._ _ W II _ ".W _.w....__w__......_JL_..,w_._ __W__ w.w.__w,..._w.w_.._ .... "I w w w.. w w w w .. "'...w . .. w w w .. W L -¡ W ""'WWW www www w w .. ... w w w w w w tlL-..w__w___..w_____w w__.w_.._ w__w___ w__w_ w__ w__w_w_ww..W_W · iii W w" ww ww w w W " W W W ww ww ww w ,.. II ww NWWWW W WWW"''WW www t-::..IW "'~',r.W www ww ~'k'W www WWW'oiI www It a:¡--- _____u ------.- - -.- .-..---... ---.--..---.-- _. .--'-------_________ , J ": .... ........ ............... ....... .... ............ ....,..... ........ ............... ,......... ... .... ..... .... ...... ... .............. tli-'" .It. t.t.. ,. .~... ~'.·.U··.' '-' ~. '.' ~ ~ -'.... ._.,..~.. ,.........'.. ..~. .....,...... t. ~,._, .,..._~. '.' ...,..t~.! ~ '." ~_......... f f'" "'.'!.'.'J.I' tn, '~." U'" '0' 'I._.~ ___... · . \." L..b.l: PRTOOl -fer. a ~ ", P.thn..~: ·ëDiiõ60U4RH)ëõGõFILES)J_PsB3125.COGO C a¡ Fj 1. h5t IIOd1U.d: 13-12-1~. 13: 12:~. Thu at.-. .. Spool.d: 83-12-15.13:14:28.Thu (Spool... ,..v 1'1.1.) ....:;. St..rteø: 13-12-1~.13: 14:32. Thu on: AP'LC by: CI II .., Knowlton-Ens) S5h-Flo.e"., Inc. eon5ult in9 Enlin..... l'··, '" · .:;. · II' . I '- :~------_.._---- .' '. ,. :1 -' , :; -- --------- (.:: 0:' :L- - .....-.... .....- ..-......... -- .. ........-........-- ---.....--...........-................ ..........-.... (. USER: R" IILLING: IfKBNA CON9LL TlNG ENGINEERS COORDINATE 6EOrIETRY 13: 11:44 12/1:5/13 fÞME -------------------------------------------------------------~----------_.-.-...--------~ c· · ... FOX HOLLOW ADON.. ØLOOCS lJ-~. LOT AREAS CHEOC ... . "' '¡-STAAT OF JOB t ' '1 3 832 11 'i.--.... _ 'U FIGURE MEA _.74___., __COOf(['INATE.ARE"-__J3_ . . , C I , LOT ". PLOCK 13 _-:r;ï~E'--"'----' ~.:!. 1 0 0 1---__1 '_______.._________ · LOCATE ft£ARING . II 1 2 N " ~3 OS E ~. SB :: 2____0.1909_".57,.._ . :; 2 3 N 2'1 50 :51 W 13:5.7:5 3___ _ 117.,9341.___2B.0180 · .~' U LOCATE LINE .,---- 3_ 2 4. :-50_ _ It¡ 4 1'1.3018 L ~LLCX:ATE BEARING__. ...u I:5N01042Ellt.88 \.....:! 5 111. ti7~ ,. ( . :,-- STåkE ·'FIGURE - .." II! 11: 2 3 C4R :5 U · 0" · II' Cui · II o· II ,- :1, - ..! - C" ,~ 3.1333-- 0.3482 -- ------- - -- --. MEA BEAR I NGS 1 J__ 0.0000_0.,0.000 N "-53- 8.0 E .". S800 2 0.19<19 ". :5798 - -. _N. 2'9~SI.0_W_13:. 7~ ~.0180 117. '341 N 2'9-50-51. ° " 3. 1333 DEL.TA~~j fit L- SO. 0000 cc US.3011 28. :5734 TAN- 14. .971 --otDRo--S-77-:J9-25. 8-W----2I. 3245- c' -. I L:~_ ~.: ,.:1------------ , '-' :L-___ ù: II' L:, -----...----- .." I I w- I ; .. I I I I 'I Ie I I I I I I I Ie - ... .,,~ ~ ~ ".,. , I . .., . ,-' ~. . L':.~ .,: hi.... 1'. ..., . i.,.~ lelC Lit.." L.& II 4;'" ,~. t H~ lHf,HW.LIC!j CIJUlf[IIr.I,., ,: '.I: I'':' 1 h V t"~ 13:11:44 J2IJ~/t:lJ ------, -----------------------------::-~:-:~~:-~-------::~:~~----h------~r------------------------ :5_ --, 111.U79:5.___. ~"82_____._____ - -..- ---. -"-.. ".____.'__ ___ __ ---'----..-.____h_. _____. S 0-10-42.0" 111.88<JO 'r---- -, I, I 0.('1000 O.~ ... :~-' -- -- ~M£A;" .¡ 14e. 2Ša ' SO~'FT .-; - o. I~ IÕ212ms t-' ·:I-:LõT-;:~.iJ------· -- ------, I'f . '~_LOCATE &EAAIHG____._ _____.'_.___________ · " 6 H 3 1 ~ ~4 E so n . ~.OOð6 D r-----.--------_____'__'_____________________ ';, LOCATE LINE If, 6 . 7 -134.63 :~ ---7--_31B.'93~__.__99.J622 ___'__..__ __ II LOCATE 8EARING :r-7.: ,S_B9-~i~2~0~OO- - ~.-i3~2 ----------.- l'.~ JI~8_9_S_0 _10_~2.W ,106. 73__ ________________ D 9 211. ~407 -1.1674 ('D "r_STORE FIGURE... _____, . '..__ ______ ________.____ .', III 2(8 9 C4A , 7 8) \..... h, 2 "___AA£A..I£ARIHGI________ _, · 2 e.. . 311.2702 . .. ~. 1391 -0.13S2 5._0=10-:42.0. "__106..1300 "I ell, .~ _,. CC V· :r---6__204.0066__ .2'.1391 c·~ . . e- II 41; 9 211. ~407 -1.1..74 S 4-~3-34.2 E ~.4227 l- 31.6192 TAN- ~O. 0000 134.6300 161.3õïi~:133jDELTÃ;_j¡:i3:;e:·2 It N 31-20-24.0 £ 16.3584 --cHORD--S-76-2-21.1-£------31.2289- N 31-20-24.0 £ ..------- --------------. - I -, ---~-_.- " I . __ I " : . 0: Itl a:! ,.....-. --_. -- _.. .---- ..------ ... .. . -.-........ - --. - - . ... --.. _._..._-~-_....__._- USER: "*' . -.. ....-.-.... II L.L.ING: ICICIøNA CONS.J.. TlNf3 ENGINEERS COORDINATE GEOPtETRY IÞMr 3 J3: 11:44 12/1~/13 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C 7 :UI.n3~ 99.1622 ,.---'---.----... .--S-"=3~=_1,,0_W_l()(1.,oøoo C :¡ 8 -I 318.2702 -0.83'2 t' r :~---.J -MEA·_._7297.020SQ.FT.~__0.1'7~16:;3 ACMS_ _-- \. . .~ _~_LOT, 12.. ILOCK 14. __._ _ _____ 'I· · " LOCATE LINE ''----_J 1,10 120___ _________.,._ __----..:____ .. 10 31'1. 12S~ -20.8346 , " .,. :r-_lOCAI~ :~":I:a iõ4i-Ë-š-i;:61- -_. t. ,e; 1 J 4:!3.734' -20.4748 uL-.____ _'___,__ ______ __..________ II 7 J 2 H 30 28 II .. 132. 37 12 433.('80.. 32.0358 .. .. ! I I....", 12 3 13 -~ tti___._ 13__.. "83.076~____, 32.6732. . Cft STOR[ FIGURE ~~'---_.. - -..-,. , 3(~O.7,t2.Ct3A II 10).._ _________ ( . "; MEA BEARINGS ' 11------=___ 3___._____ .. 10 311.12'5' -20.1346 e" N M-35- 1.0 £ :r---'---:--.318."3'-".1622---~...¡-18.0 W Clli 12 433.0806 32.03:58 ., ---.--------.--.. LOCATE LINE 120.0000 132.3700 N _ 0::43:.4'. ~_ E_SO. 0000 .. C: CC 13 '. ." 11 C·' .1 I · C: G, ( ..I '" I · 483.07'" 32.6732 DELTA- 4'-23-47.:S R L- :SS.7256 TAN- 31.0e00 -tHDRÐ--H-89-17--4f.7-W--"'--52.:514':- - - -__.S _47=--'-37..1 W_72. :S211 -20.4748 ":D. 7349 I ,., · "r---- ....':. : · \... : J'I l,tt! :' ,. I" --- -------.---.---.- ---.--.. -------- I I r I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie - I - .. .- ; ... I -. ~ -. . .. ~. .. j U~~i.ti: "..,. ÙH.L~Uù:.. I(I<UI",\ ~J'~~ûl_1 tNÿ LN'J'Nt_tJ~ COOIWJNI\Jr. CLIJf1t.JRY tJ: it:.... 12/1~/IJ ...~ 4 ,-- -'--, - --- ----- -" - --------~---- ---: -:::::::~::"- ---::~~::------------~-------,..------------ .------- -------- .r--·---' 10.____. _Jt8.1~5 - __.:-2\1."346____.._.._ __.___. _.___ _'_____________,_____.__.___._,____ ( :~ J MEA- 9M3.I(I" so. FT. - 0. 2(t814e~ ACkES L . . · LOT 8. IlOCIC 14 .,-. .~ '¡-LOCATE' KARI~ .. (' Ii 1 J .4 N 3 I 1 0 :57 E 50 .~- _14___._ :525.8'26 _ __._ 58.5615 . (. .--- ...---- _. -- --.---. , , LOCATE LINE :r-'-- _1:; 1.3 J 5. ~1~~: ;~Jj-' -12ã-:ï-9Ò'-- ---- ____. ... "L_LOCATE BEARING __________,. It 15 16 S 89 3:5 oe W 110 C · 16 6~0.107. 18.1935 . , .", "r-ï617 'ï-õïõ-4'2W s'Õ,:7 '- --- '...."i 17 :530.4081 17.e20 "L-___ ,- --_ ._______ ___.__ u_ · STORE FIGURE ô:'. 4 U:5 14 CI3L. 17 16- 15) It,___ __.. _.. ,__4.. ._____ .._'._, __ .___ _'____._, (: :~ AREA ~EAA I NGS 4 aI~..JS.__._ 6!O. .OJ:J-----J2tJ.I'~_ _ ___~_ 0: 14 525.~26 58.5615 8 :U-'0-57.0 W 134.4800 :. --_S_JI:.l~57.0_,W_~O.OOOO C:¡ CC ,13 483.0765 32.6732 DELTA- 48-34-10.6 L L- 42.0..42 --_~_17~23:-13. 6 .W_ 49_ 59" (): 17 530.4081 17.8520 N 0-10-42.0 £ 10'.7000 It ¡---_16__ ,640. 107'--J8. 1'3'_.__ l· :' . N 89-3'- 8.0 E . "I TAN- 22. 3785 --QCJRo-~83-36-53. 9-W-----40. 9b36- i ,. 110.0000 · c· · 4)1 C:: · .. .~. · ..¡ Lit: Jil 0» It II' c-,..i , . -:1 ---.-....,,- --,- ." ...-....... <II _..........10....... ......_..._.....___..__.......--._..... \. USER: RWA .ILLING: . . ICICl'NA CONSUl TJNG ENGlNE~ COORDINATE GEOPIETRY 13: 11 : 44 I V I ~/.3 pÞAGE S --------~-.-._..~...-------~-----~..._-------------------------------------- ...---.-.-~-------------~ IS 640.'033 121.1'06 - f----·- -:¡-"AAËAO - 8420. 612ŠO". FT:-:-Ó-:ï93Ji¡¡¿;- Œ-S· t '. :~~----_._--_.__._-----_._--_._------ · LOT 24. BlOCK 15 -',.---.LOCATE LJNE____ ____ ___ ______ . " ' 15 16 18 106 '\ 18 6~0.1365 22.1934 " --- --------_. LOCATE feEARING 18 19 NOlO 42 E l(aS.31 .. r--19_ __.7"8. ~460_ __ ..22. :i305 _____ _____ u, ", LOCATE BEARING "~._15.~0 N 30 38 04 W.131.SL._m________ _,___ It 20 754. 0592 61 . 1 78S v .,___ LOCATE LJNE_ .____ ___._____.________. ____._ . f.:! 2~11S 21 -~7 .08.0 35.7006 ,,1-___,___ ____ ._____________. · STORE F J GUR£ :I SClS 20 C2IR 19 18 15' It ,--__.._____..__ 5:__ _ __ '._____._,_ hi Ar.:EA BEARINGS , . ". 5 . :~15_. 640.9033__ 128.1906 ( " 20 7:i4.0592 61. 178S :¡-- ----_N_30=38:..~.0_W_5/).OOOO ()I:¡ CC 21 797.0810 35.7006 DELTA- 4:;-47-11.2 R L- 4~.2652 · S_I:;:':...9~7.:LW_50.3867 · 19 748. ~460 22.5305 c· S 0-10-42.0" :r--18_640. 1365_22. 1934_Ñ 8'-35- 8.0 E O:¡ -~.---..-.- - N 30-38- 4.0 W 131.5100 TANe 21.2772 --Q4(JftD--S-eJ -44-10.4-..----3'. œ36- 108.3100 1 (16. cÞ<tOC) ú" · :1 . \....' '-: ,-.----.---------_. -- -, (':: · v: c:, . .,1 --~._--- -....------- ----- · '.. I . ' I ,. I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~- .: ---. I ~ , . .- ":..,, '\; , t o. : :"~·.1..""": "KI-/., ..V.;..;... 1.,- ~:. "'" ;.I\:.j LIJ[J:'ll¡r.141L ~I ~It. ¡tH' ,',,!~ 1.s: J1:~4 J211~/ttJ -- -~-~:---~--:;~~~-~~~~,~~~~------=-----~~---~-~=~==-~=-~~----c==~=~=-===~____ _t_~:A- 8003.272 SO.FT.- 0.18372'P84 ACRES. . - ,! - I' l '.~._... --- . --.---- -- -- -----.---- --- -. ----------- · · LOT :!O. kOCK I' '.- . . --..----- __-:r- LOCA~~ ~A:J;:13-ÕËSO------~_. :~ 22 842.31ól 57.0027 ----- ~-------------- -- -------.- --- _ LOCATE LINE \. .. 22 21 23 -11 0.61 :;--.-~3,_.._942.4411____10:4.157L_______ __ (' Ifj LOCATE 'BEARJNG b;___ 2JJ4.N 1~.33.47_W_9S_______ ___.'__..___'_.__..________ It 24 948.1439 9.J~80 c" :r--24.'~2ŠI_O-l0-:~9~ :i;:.e -e. 9893--·---------- ("Poj "L.-.-ST.œ£.FlGURE,_____ __.,__ _.__ · 6C:!3 22 C2ll 25 24 23) (~. , :r-~A £tE~JNGS6 _______._______ .______ ___ ______._____.__, C :.~ 2:1 '42..487 104.1571 "------ '.----..--..-----, . -__.1. a=s:s~ 0.0. w ____J &0..&100_ · 22 142.3161, 57.0027 () II · "r-cc:---¡¡--797.0810 3,.7006-DELT¡;S':30-37.0 L l- :SO. 1142 TAN- 27.4351 --CHORD---S-86-27-JO.0-W-----4B.l0:5J_ c-¡ N J~-17-J7.0 W 49..,70 .; ~_8J9.3!4'_.8L9B9J_____' .~If N 0-10-42.0£ -. 24 941.1439 9.3280 If ----~.................-..-....~-- ~ .~-.......~------..-.. 5 ~-13- 0.0 .. ~. 0000 108.8000 S_86=3J~1. 0_£_'5..~ .' ,...! '-''', .: · C'· · · ~: L·"; .. a.....-________ · 23 942.4487 104.1571 ,~. · ..~--- ------ -----..-. :-- :¡ .' '->: .¡ (..,., .' ----------------._- r .- ._----- .- .-.....-...-.. .....-. .-. ---- . ...---- . -.. .. c USER: RWA BILLING: I(( r.NA CONSU. TJ N6 ENG J MEERS C[)()F([t J NATE &E0fE'TItY 13: 11:44 12/1~/83 "AGE .._---~-------------------------------._-------------------------- -~--~ ,.., ... ' lMEA~_7~J.201 SQ.~T.~_O.16742'" IICr<Es_I_----- .r- ('1 · 1____'!_lO:L3._II..OCK23_.___._ _. .__________ (' : ;TORE ....,-_ .,_26.;30_ =:5oø " ' 26 ( " LOCATE HARING .~- _ ___26 27,.5 30. :54.42 E_132.,03 _" .. _.. __.n_ · ~1 :516. 72J~ -432.1741 eM ·~_LOCATE_LINE_________ ._ , 'II 27 26 28 -so .~':¡ 2B 473.B25~ -406.4813 ~--- -----..--.-------.--- It LOCA'E ilEARJNG -" 26 29 N 19 44 58 E 100 -,--_ 29_____ 630.4J73-----=4.øo.0010__ "I C··, LOCATE l'EAfU NG ilL-- __~'_30,_S_ 2_ 22 24. W.l06.65 _. __. · 30 ~6:3. B788 -404.4174 -.-. ---- \."'u If r-- .STtmE F"J6URE_ .'___ _. ___._.__ _,.__ r.1 7 (26 27 C28R 30 ~9 2ó) ("". 7 - t:~_AREA_8EMINGS · 7 CII 26 '30.0000 -~.OOOO · ,---------------5 .30-~~~2.0_L-.132.0JOO ., . 27 ~16.123~ -432.1141 c·¡ S 30-54-42.0 E SO.OOOO ., I' I~ cc 2B .73.1255 -406.4883 DELTA- 3J-16-~1.0 R l- N 2-~- 9.0 E 29 . cm!9 50. 0Cf62 o· :r---. 30_~23.B7BI--=404.4174 o·! . .' TAN- 14. 9728 -otORÞ--"-7~-32-40. 8-£-28. "42- N 2-22-24.0 E t 06. ó~ 0: .r I L:": · '-': r---- c-¡ to ; · c...: -¡--_. t·-: :~----- - --------- I . . I ',... .. - ,. I I I .. I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie .. -~ ; .... I .....; ~ . ..' . \ . .. l,.,t" ,.:: ,...,. ¡. .:... ~ ;\.....; ",,,,.,... :.-Lr.4~J'..t J~ L'.:"Jlctt"I':;¡ L·Ut."'~'IN'U( ULU"'¿" 'Ii)' I.~ W I J: J I : ".. 1 U 1 :,/ bJ - - -- -:- - -----:::~::::---,.~:~:-- - - --------- ---- ---------------- ------ -------------"{----------------------------- r-----i.-- - "30.0000 -:íOO.oooo s 89-"-~.0 "- ,- 100._______ _____-_____----:. :~--,- -- -1 "qEAa__ -, 7100.034 SQ.FT.~ -0.1~'35 ACO£S ,1___ " . -Ir-'__. LOT 2. ILOCIC 23__.___.,__________._ .-', . " LOCATE LINE 'L..___ 29 26 31_-61________,_ ___ .__ ______ ___._ _.__ _,___. _______ '___ · 31 ~. 7041 -339.001~ .p_'. LOCATE.I6EARING._____________ ____.__________'__._._._________ :~ 3'~23:¿ 5 0 ::,~;o:/3J.~-339.41cÞ8 uL-_ _ ,_. __ __ __,.._ _____._ _____ _ _ . ____ __.___ -----, , ' .. LOCATE IEARING '-' u 32 33 I S9 44 sa iii 23." ·,-----33_.___,4".1004...___=363.2706________. ¡' ':¡ STORE FIGURE .IL--__ __.. (29 30 .C2BR 33_32 31 29J,_ D 8 ---. '. II MEA IEARINGS ,:,---- --29' ----8..JO-:-.-373-- ---=-.õö-:-õõio ~ -----,----- ------------ _________________~" '. It, ' I 2-22-24.0 W IO..6~ IJ~ 3()___S2J.87"----=-4~.~174___,___ .____ __ ._._ ... · B 2-22- '.0 W 50.0962 C" ------ - ... =¡ct....JØ_473. 82S:5~~06.~883 ,DEL.TA~ _;~:~::~~: :_~_L~ -~:.~-'t~~t..;J5,~'-=Ct1ORD~S:::~;56=;11..S=E----~e&.OJ16- ......... -. 33 ~99. 1004 -363.2706 · ----- .-.. _Þf _":-.44=.58. O_E-__2J. 8600 II 32 4".2047 -339.4101 C · N 0-10-42.0 £ 131. ~. .. r--31__630. 7041._~339.00IS________ (.,:~ 5 89-44-:58.0 W 61.0000 -L · , I. 'J. I I' , 11 ,~ =: ., f :' '-. ., · ·1 .......~; :; '..'" : , III ~ ·~:L f · ---------- --.---- (" . - -_. .~~ .. .. . US£R: lit..,. BILLING: ICIC~ COHSu..TJHG EN6JNEERS CooRDJNATE 6EDr£Tlty 13:11:44 J2/1:5/13 f'A8£ , ---~_..._-..-.------------------.-----------_-.-.,.----_.....-_....- ---------------------------------.------ -------~.. ( ~ 2'f 630.4373 -400.0010 , :r----1MEÅ;;--,¡~B.ï82-Sô~FT:;__ õ:ï7Sïiê9..- ..o.E-'¡ I~ .L__.____..,.______,_ _______. .' · Pt.OT LOTS ,~ . . -:r--F-L.DT LlNES¡_______ _____ -./ . 2 ·~__3_____ ________ ___ ______ __._ II 4 CII :5 · I. _ "1-'7 ... 8 :~-;",;o OFRÜN------ - _. -------- '':' U FIGURE MEA 74 COQF([lJNAT£ AREA 33 . ·,___,.J08__ 3___832 -CDr1e1.ETED_____.O_ERfcORS__ l':~~~~~~~.':I~ED_~ ~~[: 28 D ~ BILLING FOR THIS RUN: .~. 50 ....': 11 APF-fcOX. Cor.'t\'ECT T HE CHARGE: ''". 16 II "r--' __"'.,h -. -. .---. ..-----.-----.- -------.. ("'at. ... .,! . 0" . III ('I .J:, --.--------- - -_.....--.--. :.> ;. 0: -, ' C:¡ - C: -: C:! \....H' ! . :r-----·----- -----.:------- j' .~~! - , .:r---~- I C:L-________.._______ -________ .------- --.-.-.--_-- --.--.~ I I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ra. ,.. Barnett Teames & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers-Planners-Designers December 16, 1983 Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Fox Hollow Addition, Block 13-25 Dear Mrs. Calvert, It is our understanding that the Planning and Zoning Commission will meet on December 27, 1983, according to Mr. Davis, member of the commission. After talking wi th Mr. Davis on December 16, 1983, we are requesting that the Fox Hollow Addition, Blocks 13-25 plat be put on the agenda for re-review. It is our intention to have the final plat revised in accordance with the comments of Knowton-English-Flowers, Inc. letter dated December 15, 1983. We have contacted Mr. Richard Allbin of Knowton-English-Flowers, Inc. and he assured us that he would have enough time to review the plat if we have it in the hands of the Ci ty on Tuesday December 20, 1983. If there is any problem or any questions please call. Sincerely, ~~~a~.· BARNETT TEAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. PB/bb cc: Wayne Stewart P.o. Box 1485 e Mineral Wells, Texas 76067 _ (817) 325-9417 I I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I. f&; ,.. BURK COLLINS INVESTMENTS P. O. BOX 518 BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 (817) 268-2658 INVESTMENTS · SHOPPING CENTERS · REAL ESTATE · WAREHOUSES · OIL & GAS BUAK COLLINS OWNER December 15, 1983 Wayne Steward 201 E. Bridge Granbury, TX 76048 Dear Wayne; Please be advised you are hereby given the approval to dump water out of your three or four cul-de-sacs onto our west property line. At the time we construct our drainage channel, you have hereby agreed to direct your water into the channel. Very truly yours, q¿:~~ BC/se I I W- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I 1- ì\ \ ~ p.s P 3 -/~5 ~ Barnett Teames & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers-Planners-Designers December 14, 1983 Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills P.o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Fox Hollow Addition Blocks 13 Thru 25 BTA Job No. 83-0124 Dear Ms Calvert: The following comments are in response to your letter dated December 7, 1983, concerning Fox Hollow Addition. The name of the subdivision has been printed on the plat in large letters as you requested. The following comments pretain to Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. letter dated May 17, 1983. Item 1. The name of the subdivision has been changed from "Chapman Ridge Addition" to "Fox Hollow Addi tion" . The Lot and Block numbers have been set from Block 13 to Block 25. Item 2. The address and telephone number of the Owner has been noted on the plat. Wayne Steward 201 E. Bridge St. Granbury, Texas 76048 Item 3. The street name "Kirk Drive" has been changed as requested. Item 4. A five foot utility easement has been added along the East line of the subdivision. Item 5. Agreement has been reached by the two parties concerned on the discharge of concentrated storm water onto the "Central Park Addition" as indicated on the drainage layout sheets. A letter is forth coming to that agreement indicating no objection to the proposed drainage. Item 6. The elevations of the topographic on the West side of the subdivision corrected to 624, 626 and 628 as on the plans. P.O. Box 1485 e Mineral Wells, Texas 76067 _ (817) 325-9417 contours have been indicated I ¡' I W- I I I I I '1 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Item 7. Item 8. f""a .~ A storm drain extension requested across Little Lane now called Dana Lane. has Ranch been designed as Road on Priddy The proposed 6-inch water line Lane has been increased to an indicated on the plans. in Fox 8-inch Hollow line as Item 9. The Developer is prepared to pay his pro rata share of the existing 8-inch water line in Chapman Road. An estimate of pro rata share at $5.50 per linear foot for a total length of 1,988.49 feet. Item 10. The Developer is prepared to pay his pro rata share of the existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line along the East side of this subdivision and also on the existing sani tary sewer lines in Chapman Road. Item 11. Location East Property Line Chapman Drive Chapman Drive Size Length 1,209.47 922 312 Pro-Rata 8 8 6 $5.50 $5.50 $4.00 The Developer plans on constructing the one-half of Chapman Drive as indicated plans and in accordance with the Specifications. South on the City's The following are comments pretaining to Knowl ton-English-Flowers, Inc. letter dated December 6, 1983. Item 1. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Item 5. Refer to above comments of letter dated May 17, 1983, from Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. The address and telephone number of the Owner/Developer and Surveyor has been indicated on the plat as requested. The existing zoning been noted on the plat of this development IF-8 and IF-9 ). has A small scale vicinity map has on the plat showing the general the development. been included location of The drainage certification has been on the drainage plan (Drainage Area the construction plans sheet lB of 28. affixed Map) of I I w- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I r ... ~. ,.. ~ Item 6. Flow arrows are shown on the drainage layout plan and on the street plan to show the proposed direction of the storm water flow at each intersection. Concrete valley gutters are shown to be constructed at all intersections where stormwater will cross intersecting streets. An underground storm drain has been designed to collect water at the intersection of Doris Court and Fox Hollow Lane picking up area "N-I II as indicated on the plans. Concrete valley gutters have been designed in Fox Hollow Lane across Teresa Court, Kimberly Court and Edinburg Drive as requested. Item 7. Design calculations for concrete flumes are presented on the plan sheet IB of 28 showing pertinent hydraulic information such as hydraulic radii, wetted perimeters, cross-sectional areas and Mannings Roughness Coefficients. The Hydraulic grade lines of all underground storm sewers are shown on the profile sheets as requested. If you have any questions concerning the above comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ~£L/£r9- £~ Philli¡'YBarnett, P.E. BARNETT TEAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. PB/bb cc: Wayne Steward I I W- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( r KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 6, 1983 ~? Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-832, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOX HOLLOW ADDITION, BLOCKS 13-25, FINAL PLAT, PS 83-125, GRID 77 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would refer you to comments in our review letter dated May 17, 1983, PS 83-44, "Chapman Ridge Adn.", Preliminary Plans, regarding water and sewer prorata and street escrow considerations. 2. The address and telephone number of the Owner/Developer and Surveyor should be noted on the plat. 3. The existing zoning of this development should be noted on the plat, (IF-8 and IF-9). 4. A small scale vicinity map should be included on the plat showing the general location of the development. 5. In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer1s Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan: I, , a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographical information used in this study is in compliance with said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper subsequent detailed construction planning. ,P.E. SEAL December 6, 1983 PS 83-125 PAGE I SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I I r- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. \ . , 6. We would request that flow arrows be shown on the drainage layout plan and on each street plan to show the proposed direction of storm water flow at each street intersection. Concrete valley gutters should be constructed at all intersections where stonmwater will cross intersecting streets. For example, from the plans, it is not clear if Area IIN-llI will drain along Fox Hollow Lane and cross Doris Court discharging into the adjacent existing subdivision or if the flow in Fox Hollow will turn the corner at Doris Court and discharge from the end of the cul-de-sac out the proposed 81 wide concrete flume into the adjacent channel. In either case, we would recommend that an underground storm drain be constructed in Doris Court from the open channel at least to the intersection at Fox Hollow Lane, and designed to pick up area uN-III. Also valley gutters should be constructed in Fox Hollow across Teresa Court, Kimberly Court and Edinburg Drive. 7. Design calculations should be presented on the plans showing the basis for the sizing of the proposed concrete discharge flumes. Pertinent hydraulic information such as hydraulic radii, wetted perimeters, cross-sectional areas, Manning Roughness Coefficients used, etc., should be included in the calculations. Also the hydraulic grade lines of all underground storm sewers should be shown on the storm drain profile sheets. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. R ,~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician December 6, 1983 PAGE 2 PS 83-125 I I w- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I t ,~ \ (~ KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING £NGINEERS / Fort Worth-Oallas May 17, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-832, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CHAP~1AN RIDGE ADON., ( FOX HOLLO~J ADOITIOi~), PS 81-44, PRELIMINARY PLANS, GRID 77, 78, 86, 87 We have reviewed the refe~enced mate~ials for this subdivision and offer the fo 11 ow; ng C()T1tnents: 1. We would suggest that t1e name of this subdivision be changed f~om "Chapman Ridge Addition" to "Fox Hollow Addition". The tax office should be consulted rega~ding the approp~iate lot and block numbers to be used for this addition. 2. The add~ess and telephone numbe~ of the Owner should be noted on the plat. 3. We would suggest that the street name "Kirk Drive" be changed since there is a Kirk Lane already in North Richland Hills. 4. An additional 5-foot utility easement may be required along the east line of this subdivision. All utility companies should be contacted regarding any additional easement requirements. 5. The Developer should be required to obtain a letter fr~ the Owner of the future proposed "Central Park Addi tion" confi nning that he has no objection to the proposed concent~ated stormwater discharge points shown on the drainage layout sheet. 6. The elevations of the topographic contours on the west side of the subdivision appear to be incorrectly labeled: 634, 636, 638 should be 624, 626, and 628. 7. The grade of Priddy Lane appears to be too flat to carry the conputed 5-year discharge at Little Ranch Road without exceeding the curb and gutter carrying capacity. A stonn drain extension across Little Ranch Road 1nay be required. 8. We would request that the proposed 6-inch water line in Fox Hollow Lane be increased to an 8-inch line. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG, · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METR0/267-3367 I I , '~ -'I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I Page 2, Planning & Zoning Comrnission, May 17, 1983 9. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the existing a-inch water line in Chapman Drive. We would estimate pro rata at $5.50 per linear foot for a total length of 1,988.49 feet. 10. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the existing a-inch, sanitary sewer line along the east side of this subdivison and also on the existing sanitary sewer lines in Chap- man Drive: LOCATION SIZE 8 8 6 LENGTH East Property Line Chapman Drive Chapman Drive 1,209.47 922 312 PRO-RATA $5.50 5.50 4.00 11. The Developer should be required to sig~ a covenant agreeing to participate in the cost of future curb and gutter, paving and storm drain construction alon~ Chapman Drive in accordance with the City's street assessment policy. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works ~ I' I, Ie I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I DATE: February 8, 1984 I) SUBJECT: PS 84-1 Final Plat of Kingswood Estates, Section 3 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located north of Starnes Ro.ad and is bounded on the east by the existing " Kingswood Estates All corrections have been made and the Engineer's comments have been met except for item #1 of the Engineer's letter of February 2, 1984. Their Engineer, Mr. Long, said they would have the..', letters prior to construction. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final plat. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of final pIa t · BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO X d~~~ r '- , ~, , , Il r II' --'!!!! -..-- ~ 1"1 . . I . , . " 1- ~ . , .::.. -. -'''''wo·'' IF-7' ~ / _:: I~ ~ I - .- .- .."'- , Ii· ~ : t 1 i . ¡ t_, I I ~.. ~t~~"'; > i : : ~ _1.- I , í f ~ j ¡,.- ~ L _ ....--= \ ~......, I ,j..._... ' - : AG ~ . I c - ~ 11 Jf I > I 1 I I ,_ ~ T r I I Ilil AG \, ~ Lt: MAl2o~~~ . '. ft I r 4DÞ~"" 0 ~ IfÏrrT Ps í4:'!;1f'T< ~~.~~~, i~, ::~) I ~ ~ ~~.... ~8 [j ,.-.... -~ \ j 1--- ; f f - ,- I --¡ ..... .- - _J I ; 1__-, r-- "r ~---- I .000 ¡ _~ I 1 1 I - I I I .. <:J ~~t~~;:;- ,- I ,,----L...:!. 'f mtni --¡ r I I ~I ' --..,¡ AG ". ..i{,.: ,~ . ~ I I - ;1 1"- 1-- Ii-- - t-- '-- - , 1..:1 t~ ---J - - -1 I .::.-, 83~? 1iR- c IL,/ ef4í:'-.-:' J f)Oø~~ '.;." . ,,":,¥ ,.::~8J :"",__.-i L ~?:. r r- -.::¡ r---r ........I ~ ~~ r to-- I -= A' .4..J¡"t~ p.s ~3- Zi,lf . a........ . (iTð'-'&r AÞ'!"''' ;~; ~ L- ' L.t, &.1.. r~'.",~ " ~'- '.' ~ - --' AG' , : < t: ~ ~"._,,,":~",:Þ;~~J ~ ~ p ... - I~ - = - - ur.o~ a.. I', .., - I II ~ j I¡ .~ I I -- - ~ - II: f r - - I ~I I .. lr--. - - 1 11 ~,,::;~ ; '~II':. I.. 1-_, ..'- PS l'~ I ¡ .. "". f)-' lu 'i JI \ ( . ~.. - I , " ._ .1 -1 I..--í , ~ I I - - I PS B i .~ P..w." Iii I.. 1-". e AG --=:11 1 J 1J it :..*1 'L "1 l 1_ -r ;1 II t I I I 1'1 '1 J 1.1. f( ;:::- -m:;:--' . u~1 AI; ;,.- ~I C !I. _. _I 1"1. I ~D 1"5. ¡.. A L. - .. La., A'. ,. ~ ..C~~;~"e ~$T'-- -158 j~ - AG..!; -1---1 ~ .~~. -ria. ~- NR Sk~~ ~ r _I I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ ( MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS FEBRUARY 2, 1984 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:35 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT Chairman SECRETARY Members Alt. Member Councilman P & Z Coordinator George Tucker Marjorie Nash Don Bowen Mark Hannon Mark Wood John Schwinger Richard Davis Wanda Calvert 1. PS 84-1 DENIED 1/26/84 Reconsideration of the final plat of Kingswood Estates, Section 3. Chairman Tucker called for the engineer of this project to come forward. Owen D. Long, Consulting Engineer, came forward. Chairman Tucker asked about item #1 of the City Engineer's letter of February 2nd regarding the letters from the adjoining property owners. Mr. Long stated that the owner, Mr. Austin, had talked to all three and sees no problem. He said one lives in North Carolina and one is an attorney. Mr. Long said if they could not get the letters, they could have the runoff go into an existing easement, but there are several trees they would like to keep. Mr. Long said the lady to the south has had a problem of water in her house and we will be helping her to protect her house. He said they have avoided a problem there and she wants to keep her stock pond. 1°' Page 2 ~ P & Z Minutes Ie February 2, 1984 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Long stated they should have no problem with the two property owners to the west. He said there will be a 30 foot wide ditch, 6 inches deep. Mr. Austin came forward. He said he had met with one of the property owners today, Mr. Davis, who has agreed, but he wants some dirt work done. Mr. Austin said he agreed to do anything he needed to do. Mr. Austin said he had talked to the attorney of the other property owner and they do not feel there would be a problem, but it just takes time when they live out of town. Mr. Long said he stated on the plat that they would obtain the letters before construction begins. Mr. Long said in regard to item 2 of the Engineer's letter, he had talked to Mr. Albin and stated he would provide him with the calculations, but Mr. Albin said he did not need them. Chairman Tucker said the Commission feels they should have the letters before approving the plat. Mr. Long said they were not aware they would be required to have the letters at this time. He said that would cause them to have to deal with the property owners under pressure. Mr. Long said the staff still has the control. He said all we can do on the property is a little farming, grading and removing trees. Councilman Davis asked if there would be a problem with drainage to the west. Mr. Long said there would not be a drainage problem. Councilman Davis said they should try to have the letters prior to going to the City Council. I~' Page 3 ~ P & Z Minutes February 2, 1984 Ie I I I I I PS 84-1 APPROVED I 2. PS 84-3 DENIED 1/26/84 I Ie I I I I I I II Ie I { Mr. Long said they would try, but would rather they not make this a requirement. He said they know they can not concentrate water; if the easements are not available, the Council can refuse to allow us to build. Mr. Hannon said the Commission approved the preliminary plat and feel they should approve not hold them up on this plat. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 84-1. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Reconsideration of the Short Form of Lot 1, Block 26, Fox Hollow Addition. Chairman Tucker called for the Engineer of this plat to co Delbert Stembridge, Co Engineer, came forw He said he understood the re on this plat was denied was the ck of fire protection. r. Stembridge said the owners hav agreed to provide adequate fire pr ection. Ch rman Tucker said there was also ncern about the right of way for Chapman Road. He said the owners of the property to the west of this property had to agree to take off 20 feet of a reverse curve and the Commission felt to align Chapman Road might take some extra right of way off this property. Mr. Stembridge said the owner agrees to give additional right of way if it is needed. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 84-3 subject to installing a fire hydrant and granting any easements needed for Chapman Road. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 5-0. I' . . Ie I I I I I I -I I. I I I I I / / .. ·1 I Ie I Page 2 ~ P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ( Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wish g to speak in favor of this reque to please come forward. State Representative Char es Evans came forward to repres t Mid City Pizza. He said this roperty is already zoned C-l a the restaurant is already open. r. Evans said they need an approv for liqour lisence which would b in the name of Dan Cole. Mr. Woo asked how many other Specific Uses w re there along Rufe Snow. Mr Evans said there were probably ree. He said their main business / ould be the sale of pizza. / // /' Chairman Tucker called for those ~. wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. 1. PZ 84-10 //' APPROVED / / / / / PS ¥-125 D".-1ed 12/15/83 / There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 84-10. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Wayne Steward for reconsideration of the final plat of Blocks 13 thru 25, Fox Hollow Addition. PS 83-125 DENIED Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny this plat without prejudice since the plans have not been reviewed by the City Engineer. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion to deny carried 5-0. 2. PS 84-1 Request of B & M Development Company for final plat of Kingswood Estates Addition, Section 3. PS 84-1 DENIED Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 84-1 because the plans are incomplete. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash. I·- . . Ie I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 3. PS 84-2 PS 84-2 APPROVED 4. PS 84-4 PS 84-4 DENIED 5. PS 8 8 6. PS 84-9 ~ // / / / 1/ /' /' ./ ~ Chairman Tucker stated the Commission needs more information regarding the drainage. The motion to deny carried 5-0. Request of Jack Cook for final plat of Lots 5 & 6, Block 1, Mollie B. Colli Addition. MS. Nash made the motion to app ove PS 84-2. This motion was sec ded by Mr. Bowen. Mr. Hannon asked how th handle Odell Street. plan to Mr. Bronstad said dell Street is already in and ~ ey will have to bore under the stre~ for water and sewer. / / The motion.¿ approve PS 84-2 carried 5-0. // Requ~t of James R. Phillips for Short FoniPlat of Lot 2, Block 32, College ¡µ:il Addition. ".I .I I #/ Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 84-4 since this lot has no street frontage. He said the Subdivision Ordinance requires 50 feet of street frontage. The motion to deny was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Tucker stated they would hear the next two cases together but would vote on them separately. Request of David Barfield for preliminary plat of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition. Request of David Barfield for final plat of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition. Chairman Tucker stated that regarding item 14, the pro rata had already been paid. // I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I ,I I Ie ~ #4 . ~ , { KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas February 2, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Rich1and Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-840, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS KINGSWOOD ESTATES, SECTION 3, REVISED FINAL PLANS, PS 84-01, GRID 41 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. The developer's engineer has indicated that he is in the process of working out agreements with downstream property owners regarding stormwater discharge on their properties. Upon finalization of these agreements, written letters of confirmation should be furnished to the City before approval of this development. 2. The developer's engineer has also indicated that calculations have been performed and are available, but not all are shown on the plans, demonstrating that downstream capacities are in compliance with subdivision ordinance requirements. We would recommend that the deve1oper1s engineer be prepared to furnish you with these calculations if you request them. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician February 2, 1984 PS 84-01 PAGE 1 !5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 · 817/283-8211 · METRO/287-3367 I Ie I I I I Ie I I I I I ~ I Ie I " -:<"-~_.!'- -,~ -~-)~... - ~- I' , KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, \NC. CONSUL 11NG ENGINEERS I Fort worth- Dallas February 2, 1984 ¿ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. LooP 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-840, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS n~~W%OD ~~JA~i' - SEC~I~N ij' ~ "REVISED FINAl PLANS, P~ 84-0!, GRID We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision the following comments: 1. The developer's engineer has indicated that he is in the working out agreements with downstream property owners r stormwater discharge on their properties. Upon finalizé these agreements, written letters of confirmation shoulc furnished to the City before approval of this developme' 2. The developer's engineer has also indicated that calcul been performed and are available, but not all are showr plans, demonstrating that downstream capacities are in with subdivision ordinance requirements. We would recl the developer's engineer be prepared to furnish you wi calculations if you request them. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this please do not hesitate to call. , "''I:. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Wor Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician February 2, 1984 PS 84-01 !5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · B17/2B~ i· Ie I I I I I Ie I I I I I .- I Ie I Owe~+D. Long and Associate[Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS January 25, 1984 Mrs. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Kingswood Estates - Section 3 - Final Plat and Plans - PS-84-01 Dear Mrs. Calvert: We have received a copy of your eng;neerl..s (r~r. Richard Albin) letter dated January 8, 1984, pertaining to the Kingswood Estates, Section 3 and have the following comments: 1. The contiguous platting and ownership has been shown on the plat. 2. The existing zoning for this development has been shown on the plat. 3. The engineer's certification has been added to the drainage plat layout. . 4. The dev~loper is making contact to obtain letters from the adjacent owners of the property to the west and to the north for the street stubs and storm water discharge on to their property. The engineering plans are being revised to show the routing and channel capacity of the discharge outside of the existing pond to the ·north. Some additional surveying has been required to complete the routing of the discharge outsi,de of the existing pond even though there is an existing drainage easement because the owners of the pond have requested that it not be filled. We feel that all items have now been addressed and request that the City approve our fianl plat. Thank you for your assistance. _ · CerelY'~ w . ~ong , P. . Consulting Engineer -If¿ J ODL/ml cc: Mr. G. W. Austin, Jr. 1616 Precinct Une Road - Suite 106 I Hurst, Texas 76063 I Phone (817) 281-8121 I I Ie I I I I Ie I I I I I f I Ie 1"',0-< '~'I""'.""",-;·- ......."...~..Q."-...,......:r-~:."~,.-......"""'~,.*-"......, ( (' KNOWl10N_ENGl\SH-FlOWERS, \NC. CONSUL11NG ENGINEERS I Fort worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 ~ Planning and 10ning commission City of North Richland Mills 7301 N.E. LooP 820 North Richland Mills, 1exas 76118 RE: 3-840, Cl1'l Of NOR1M RICMLAI ~&W~ ~1W~' ~C1~0~ TI--AL PL~NS, ~ ~~Ol, GRTI We have reviewed the referenced materials for this sub the following comments: 1. All contiguoUS platting and/or ownershiP should pl at. 2. 1he existing zoning for thiS development area ': Pl at. 3. In accordance with the subdivision ordinance t Developer's Engineer should affix the followi' drainage plan: 1, ' a professional eí the state of 1exas ,nave prepared thi s ' compliance with the latest published r~ of the City of North Richland Mills, ar topographiCal information used in thiS wi th sai d requi rements and i s otherwi s this workable overall Plan of Drainage through proper subsequent detailed cor _, P. Eo SEAL #' t";" 4. 1he developer should be required to obtai: of the property west of this subdiviSion objection to the proposed concentrated st property from Brooke Drive and Keno Lane~ this development for discharge from the lots 3 and 4 of the Oakvale Addition out easement. furthermore, the developer's --- pS 84-01 January 8, 1984 550 FIRST STÞ.TE Bþ.NK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TE){Þ.S 7 l- Ie I "I I I I I I Ie I I I I I ·1 I Ie I .. ( to present on the drainage plans calculations which show that the offsite downstream drainage channels have sufficient capacity to handle at least a IO-year stonm at each discharge location. Also, the developer1s engineer should show routing calculations for the discharge into the existing pond in the Oakvale Addition based on SCS or other acceptable criteria and methods demonstrating that flooding of the structure and adjacent property will not occur for the IOO-year storm. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PS 84-01 PAGE 2 /1 I, I I (.,') February 8, 1984 r;.) ." DATE: I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I SUBJECT: e I DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located on the north side of Odell Street and west of Smithfield Road. PS 84-2 Final Plat of Lots 5 & 6, Block 1, Mollie B. Collins Addition All corrections have been made. The owner agrees to pay the pro rata. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final plat. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of final plat. BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A NO x ..E -:Ë=:= ' t I ¡, I I t I · I ; -~ = = 1 ~.,..1,1 I .1 ~: JI-....-'7_'.[ IF ,tL :J I' :- - ~ - ;: if:/: - ILII-I...-= - I II~ , XI 7c=.'~ . P-::: t J 1It-ll 7 )'L-. --u - ~ A~ I I I'" ~ ~ ~_ _ . IIIIRi - ~,.,.. T ¡ , .. : "-.0 '~'~~m' ~ -':L, :uw,¡ :.D ,,,7'; r' " Lt ''\~\ "". 't J:I:],,~]¡1L, -~.. J -I J::biE=1J+i'"1 r J L, t~ [:·"....-(.B .. -,.'._, LIt~~ ~J .r~TI :!:~« II !J." 'R::::Jf:3::I p:::¡, - ¡o; I a. , - ~ 90 p ør. s.u. 7.,1 ~ . ....... , L.r" 'rY __I- ~ LI£. . ~-l If'IttIA'- C '4 ,~~.... ~ ~ - ~:_~ ~~ R-l- -DI IP 1"'1" )F-7' ~ PS Ð~;' '''A II! 4- =1'1::: I ~,-~ r-r- I _ =. ~ - , H ~.. '. ~ ~ L1 ~ \ M~ ~ - ~~ \. ~1 _ j~. c: -VLW LR =. ì r~·J"'~.LS ,......, ... _ II l - ~ - - ')I:.L..L~ ~ 5' I " I II I T - I - ~~' r- _.~ i - . ~ òij ~IC.&'" ..,j I ~()(J - .-( .ill -='I: - r ~ ~ .. I --1 1(~:- - /' - . - e..: - . b........;-"- '-~..::! 1 '(ál"--: -- I' -),. I TTl '1 !! ·c e.elJT1 ,(l..J c 4~, - , .r\~ ~ - 1'9 (4"11...1.. t'~... ~." 0 - ---iD - ~-~!., :::!.. A"'Jl....~ ,- Q 17" ,.... V"'VVIlt' ~. J ~ - ~U' ~¡ ~ - ~ 'J:;::.,...t'! '.... ~ ~ .... ~, LJõõ..... = J ,4 7r~" .... ~ ~ '...... þ ..~~ cae:.., ,', ,MF. I " OJ = :-IIjif~".¡::! lAG ( ~ Y "! r-r'" . oJ C . . ,. - . .. - a 0- -r . ~·Th.]'.. ,...... -...... L , ~., ) "~-J ../ C to- : - ~ - . ~ .' . .._ AG ',;.' _ nL~~"-,):- 8.1 A'. 5-4 ~..]I~ C ::;.. ..J...~ìTT1 .- ' _ '.. - I 1 ¡-C;" Sf"""'"*' ~J >- .!I_~ ~;:»:' '~r'\JJ...lL:' :,\ I ::::1= ::¡:: r fS 't.-Ø b-j::-r-~ . tþ\....A ~~. _....., 1: T . -J:= ~~ r AGL ,-12' ~'Q §- :~ /,11 IIJ:H.=~ll\ ~ ¡¡;¡ ~1~- ~[:: ,.&. A~ 1· n r ~ , C - J iii ..rffI I A _I-- , I- þ- . I- . ~. .~ - I~ .... -~ tt:jt--- . ~ - ,. ., ~:.. 1-,1 II~U I r- r- n YI ~ .. or_ ..--:::E... t::'-' - A" ,I: ' ::j , = ~[~ \. - T r tl~"·"C. '-~ I~~ -;::L: IV~.~'.. -1= i-I hj~ - e&l~uICIOl P!4Iã. ~~ - ~ ~-- --,~:...V"I ,-,~".&J,al dE'-- i~-v,~ NR C m~1r\~1.~ :::i~ I 1 .... = _ AG A" .. IV V" Ii: ..... ~ [Il]-;:::- ~ \, .J..[ =30 II I ~= ~~-1S == ....~ ¡,::= . Hlrr (.~ -~ P$ ø,.~ -l.r II - I >7' ~II~ §-~~--r W-_ ::::::; ~ 1 )~ .- u .r: - .~ - ~ ~-I ~ü I - · ...-.....--..::- ..~~ . ~' = T r.. =~ ..,.:::~:" { ~ 1.''2-L/ r 71 I' 1\ .. · .. PS -t-JIL. - ^7 'fJlltþ"~~ f-rï~~ f r-' ~~ . ~ /Ð lie. :::.:. - -...r \..( MølJ.' , m·... 0 PEU AJII1tI. . :. ' , \ L-i/t. to: - "'_m-"Ð II ~ ,~.' r,'~ ~ I I III &.. ,.-~.. , pS &3 18 _ = -- . .. 1 I~ *..' .J If ~ U I ~~ r p r\ 1 U~ - i, ~ 1'1' l:-m -I~ I · I Jf7. II j I tF-'2 Fiüu.. 1/ IPS eð-'Z," r r Jrl AG 7- = I II , 1\ I I 11 I _ ~n-'1~ -~ ~~. ~...~ 9( I I I~. ..,:.....~, , , I· f\f. ~#,,-'; AP. ~.îs:s~ -r'l~' ~ P$ 11-51 C' " . .. , 1'( AP. 4#1I.,B ~'" .1II1r I ~ ~~ "OLut o.~ ..~. PS 13- ~" . - >-.... (... L", 6.. ........ fS 1)-"11 r(;ðltll.' ~";¡,,,.," ~ ~ ~~ to- AI'. '01*1'/81. ..,.....J~ftet. /.. 162" &1.. .." ~ . . 1= YS 81'.' =~~'-: ~ .=-,~ ":G\. iii' ,~;;¡::11J "'~"""';; ~~~ ~: ~ Ë~ __ &~.''i~j'" - ..... s.U., 1. · ' /72r- t" I , -i. ! ·-IT C.,I ,.. U/,~tþ ~u L.£' LR øØt~ j. I T ~~ io...- - ~ I _' ] '1 ~ ~~ IF-8 ..- ~ -'. _,." - ___.... ~ ~ ., t' I!' I =-~I , ,ll'5 ft. ss/" ~ - " '. :.,'~'.".. . ~~ 1: 1~1I III""I~ ~, r-i · f.. T ~~I I j ( M/~ "..,....,s . ~-:.-:~' ,- LR .: .. -- · IlH lIí~ V ~, , r". '. . If 1~-9 ~ i t;.~,,···:ft4J'2-' \ ,¡~,' C I ~/ ~ , . : :~,. ~ - _I ...,.-'-. ~ /_ Ad'....J . ,IS "SI":.-'-"· I a ' ';'- - · - - - 1 I. /'ÆrT . ~~~~~ ~j_~~~lb*~I7iõ;M:~ r '~~~-~~.1S - IJ _.~ I ~ <. frD" tfcr,.c.ow ~. "). I:~- ~ ~ I "/ ~ .:...- I ¡ ~..." -, ~....~ ....... :;:¡ ~ I..:J) ~"ID,I.I F-12 I,', · (.~ · 1__ ," A9 ., I I I' II :: AI'· 4·' I-g~ III1 PS 13- z',Zf. ç". ~'-eør A,ÞØtJ· L.I I e., II~~ _ AG 1I II!" _1 Iê II . . : ,oJ ß / / / Page 3 ~ P & Z Minutes January 26. 1984 I ' ',.,..... e! I .' .... 3. PS 84-2 I ,I I \:' I PS 84-2 APPROVED 4. PS 84-4 le( I I \1 ·:1"'" , ' II t- I i,'. I· ~I PS 84-4 DENIED 5. PS 84-8 6. r-- Chairman Tuck the Commission e information regarding the drainage. The motion to deny carried 5-0. Request of Jack Cook for final plat of Lots 5 & 6, Block 1. Mollie B. Collins Addition. MS. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-2. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. Mr. Hannon asked how they plan to handle Odell Street. Mr. Bronstad said Odell Street 1s already in and they will have to bore under the street for water and sewer. The motion to approve PS 84-2 carried 5-0. Request of James R. Phillips for Sho Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 32. Col Hill Addition. Mr. Hannon made the mot to deny PS 84-4 since this 1 has no street frontage. Be sai he Subdivision Ordinance requ es 50 feet of street frontage. Ion to deny was seconded by Mr. and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Tucker stated they would bear the next two cases together but would vote on them separately. Request of David Barfield for preliminary plat of Lot 3. Block 1. Martin Addition. Request of David Barfield for final plat of Lot 3, Block I, Martin Addition. Chairman Tucker stated that regarding item 14, the pro rata had already been paid. .,~¿/ _ . _..,~,,"',1f~ I,- I Ie I I I I I Ie I I I .·.·1 ... I "I' e I T ~ ~ lh~ KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 9, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-906 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MOLLI£ B. COLLINS ADDN., ~~T~ 5 I 6, BL.1, FINAL PLANS, PS 84-02, GRID 69 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Please see our review letter dated December 7, 1983, PS 83-126, regarding prorata and escrow considerations. 2. See item no. 5 of our Decembrer 7 letter regarding a request for construction plans on Odell Street. Should you have a~ questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 9, 1984 PS 84-02 PAGE 1 !5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 · 817/283-8211 · METR0/287-3387 J I ..' _ I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ,1_ 1 ~ r:" KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 7. 1983 / Planning and Zoning Commission Ci~ of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Rfchland Hills. Texas 76118 RE: 3-906. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MOLLIE B. COLLINS ADDN.. LOTS 5 & 6. BLOCK 1 jpRELIMINARY-PS 83-126. GRID 69 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Utility companies should be contacted to detenmine if any easements are required to serve this lot. 2. A Surveyor's Certification Statement should be affixed to the plat. 3. We would suggest that the owner be required to pay his prorata share of a future 6-inch water line in Odell Street. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for a total length of 196.9 feet for one-half of a 6-fnch line. 4. The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street improvements on Odell or construct any required paving improvements along the frontage of his property at this time. 5. If the developer agrees to provide curb and gutter and paving improvements on one-half of Odell Street along the frontage of this development in lieu of escrowing the funds for future street improvements. then we would request that construction plans be submitted to our office for review. ' 6. We would suggest that the proposed sanitary sewer line in Odell Street be terminated with a manhole in lieu of a clean-out. and a stub-out be constructed at the end of the line to facilitate future extensions. December 7. 1983 PS 83-126 PAGE 1 850 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 . .,7/28.-8211. METRo/a87..a..7 r'; ,. ~ ~ """···.1.. .- ..... .. I I ,.e I Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enelosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler. Engineering Technician Ie I .::,1 .··:··,'.'··'.··.,··1' .. <I ,I I -- ,I Ie l December 7. 1983 PS 83-126 PAGE 2 1 I, Ie I 1 I I 1 -I Ie I 1 I I I I I Ie I I DATE: February 8, 1984 SUBJECT: PS 84-9 Final Plat of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road, between Amundson Road and Martin Drive. All corrections have been made. There is no fire protection for this property due to the size of the water lines in that area. The pro rata for water has already been paid per Allen Bronstad and they will have to provide us with an approved perc test. The requested they be allowed to sign a covenant for future street improvements. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final plat. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of final plat. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x --2J~ ~ .. I · I Ie I I I I I I IfI I I I I I I I Ie I '. I Page 3 ~ P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ('--- 7' / Chairman Tucker stated the Commission~ needs more information regarding th drainage. The motion to deny carried 3. PS 84-2 Request of Jack Cook Lots 5 & 6, Addition. plat of Collins PS 84-2 APPROVED e motion to approve motion was seconded by Mr. annon asked how they plan to dIe Odell Street. Mr. Bronstad said Odell Street is already in and they will have to bore under the street for water and sewer. The motion to approve PS 84-2 carried 5-0. 4. PS 84-4 Request of James R. Phillips for Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 32, College Hill Addition. Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 84-4 since this lot has no street frontage. He said the Subdivision Ordinance requires 50 feet of street frontage. The motion to deny was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Tucker stated they would hear the next two cases together but would vote on them separately. 5. PS 84-8 Request of David Barfield for preliminary plat of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition. 6. PS 84-9 Request of David Barfield for final plat of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition. Chairman Tucker stated that regarding item 14, the pro rata had already been paid. I Page 4 ~ P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 I Ie I PS 84-8 APPROVED I I I I I lec I PS 84-9 APPROVED I I I I 7. PS 84-10 I I Ie I ~ Mr. Bronstad said that was correct. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-8. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood. Mr. Hannon said this property does not have adequate fire protection. Mr. Bronstad said they are aware of that, but the water lines are too small to carry a fire hydrant. Mr. Bronstad said they will need a percolation test. Chairman Tucker said it would need to be stated that when fire coverage is available, they would tie on. The motion to approve PS 84-8 carried 5-0. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-9. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. Councilman Davis asked if they should have stated about the pro rata. Chairman Tucker said all engineer's comments must be complied with or waived by the Commission. Mr. Hannon said the collection of pro rata or requiring covenants is a staff function. The motion to approve PS 84-9 carried 5-0. Request of YMCA & Muhsen replat of Lots 2R, 3R, & Emerald Hills Addit Mr. Bow aid the Commission has a r from the Director of Public Works/Utilities requesting they sign a covenant for future improvements on Lynda Lane. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 84-10. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. f.,.··~· . . \ ~ 'f I I" I I I I I Ie I I , I I '1 , :,·e I ',,1. .~:, , ..' ,'C ~., ,. '04 .~ * ~, ~ ~ .~ ~ Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers January 24, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition, Preliminary and Final Plat, PS 84-08 9 In response to Knowlton-English-~lowers letter dated 'January 11,1984 we offer the following comments: 1. The owner of this lot would prefer to negotiate with TESCO to provide alternate easements to those requested. 2. The existing permanent structures have been added to the preliminary plat. . 3. The owner is awar~ that this lot is not within the SOO-foot radius cover of a ,fire ~ydran t. 'The lot does have exis ting 'water service and no ,additional utilities are proposed. 4. The water service for this lot is already existing. 5. No additional water facility is proposed. 6. The o~elL would prefer to sign.8 ,'letter covenant agreeing :t,o ,partic'i.pate ,in 'the, cos t 'of future street improvements ·onPrecinct 'Line Road in lieu of escrowing this money. 7. See item number 6. . 8. The existing Beptic~éystem is adequate and no improvements are proposed "at this ~im~' 9. The properties to the west of this platting belong to Mr. Gray and to Mrs. Oggier. Both Mr. Gray's and Mrs. Oggier's properties front existing roads. Mr. Gray's property extends 'to Amundson Road and Mrs. Oggier' s property extends to Prencinct Line Road. . , ~ - ",;. ..; J,. i I' I Ie 1 I I I I Ie I I I I I i I Ie I ". " '. .., r.,·.... ." r· ~ ~, p. ~ ( If there are any fuither questions regarding these lots, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely. ~ ~~.~f ~ert -. -tem- r-l. g , P.E. DRS/bb cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( K NOWL TON-E NC LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 11, 1984 ;> Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-941, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MARTIN ADDITION, LOT 3, BLOCK 1, PREL. AND FINAL PLAT, PS 84-08/9, GRID 72 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Utility companies should be contacted to determine if any easements are required to serve this lot. 2. The subdivision ordinance requires that all existing permanent structures be shown on the plat. Also, if this lot is presently served by water facilities then we would request that the location of these services be shown or noted. 3. Although water plans have not been submitted to our office for - review, it appears that adequate fire hydrant coverage has not been provided for this lot based on the 500-foot radius requirement for this zoning. 4. The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of a future 12-inch water line in Precinct Line Road. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for one-half of an equivalent 6-inch line for a total length of 60 feet, if tap fees have not already been paid. 5. If additional water services are required for this lot then open cuts will not be permitted across Precinct Line Road unless approved by the Public Works Department. 6. The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street improvements on Precinct Line Road or construct any required paving or driveway improvements along the frontage of his property at this time. The City of Hurst Public Works department should be consulted to determine the future proposed width of Precinct Line January 11, 1984 PAGE 1 PS 84-08,9 SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEX,AS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I - I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I ~ f ( Road along with street grades and other controls. 7. If the developer agrees to provide curb and gutter and paving improvements on one-half of Precinct Line Road along the frontage of this development in lieu of escrowing the funds for future street improvements, then we would request that construction plans be submitted to the City of Hurst and to our office for review. 8. If improvements to the existing septic system which serves this lot are proposed, then we would request that they be sent to the County Health Department for review and approval, and the results of the review be furnished to the City. 9. Consideration should be given to requiring the owner to dedicate a portion of this property for ingress/egress to property west of this platting. If a dedicated right-of-way is provided then it should be improved to City Standards. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 11, 1984 PS 84-08,9 PAGE 2 I' I' e I I I I I I -I Ie I I I I I I I {I ~ DATE: February 8, 1984 15 SUBJECT: PS 84-10 Replat of Lots 2R thru 4RI Block II. Emerald Hills Addition DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This proEerty is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard at Lvnda Lane. This is the YMCA proEerty and they have sold a ~rtion of it to Mr. Shabout. We required them to replat. All corrections have been made. They request the~ be allowed to sign a covenant for future street improvements on Lynda Lane. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this replat. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat. BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A NO x .,.g~ O~I.J- ~ I L - AG )- T7 1)11 ., ,. ~ 1/ ~ 8~ -4-4- J _~F;9..,.._', I · I~, - -. Ie...... L.LL ',<-r:[ IZA"'PMIWJ. f2.&pdt8 6.DøtJ. ~A~ j..:; b..... ;is: C .......,. fS 1f-14,1S lL .' t.! .. (. ~O" t+Q..LouJ .,6.ØØfo,t.") 00r , I~ '\ I // I:/' I ' ~IW 'oS ADP'" ~ ~ I if. d: . . == "t F....."..c.. p~ t~ -1'2..S ~£~~~ ADDÑ'../~~ 9 ~ r.1,10, S., IF-12-~ ~ L....,hf¡. ,-- EG ~~.... tfl .' fJ"At.. f'LAí ..........k:J I ~j.... ~NR ....-lk I _to '._".,. .or f-~ 'b- , , ,. E::l! ¡tJ~ r5 f~"J ~ ~l~ R I: ~7 '¥~ I I I' t _ r1 .J', ~ .A ' 7 C AG ~G~\ : tr,~' ~c~",. :i~=f~~~ AG) I - LR I~~~S~:; n T ~ II ¡ T T .P. ! \ _I H ; ; I I I· · I T T\. - ~ lR AG L"[ AG r "" ..... 'ßT II ' ~ 0-- .""".. j \ ; P== ~ I I u",~ l.-~ I L __~;'S IN-/.,J_ ..,.... . J ~ \ t · I' ) ~ 1 LR ~~ L- 2Fr9- CoOl-£-' ILl - l I I "'I__./--.J~ J'-¡ IDIt-' ~ " ~ .f.-:~-,-- ~ :.-. um I~ At:" JIZ. i IF-9 : l MF 11- ~ . ~ G. / LR I ~ \ \, 1& ~.c' f$ g%~4-0 '\' ~ f'S '~·5S ~F I \\ " \ / cÞ'..LE(,£.;· IF-9 \ &ton \, _ UH,LS -S.U. _ " ,ÞAQ.,2AC ¡.IÞ AG ,~ '3-1,8 ~ \ " , - ~"'J-""''''COLLEGE __ - f'$84,-+ AP. -J-,¡~·..9..5 ~o~~i -,- \ '::);. C"",SlorJ_ Ap, ','/$/Il. _._ ~, : .~~tL~..a !'5 93:!~~ ~~-::=.... lAEApoW$ \ ·~I' (~. ~ :: ~i:~3 -" - ~~~~~~~ - ) AP. %-Z3183 ;J. I ~ , ,~, PS ,~, -_. " , IK'~;--~~IT:tr, "'~j~~~~ C ::~~\ I i ¡ ~ si, I ~ ~\. L.LLJ J.b-IITl . 40~ -¿'~C. ~su · I· i 5 I. - I :.1. ~ j I 1,. 1 ~ 1 ., L 1 ..J" . ....I- g , ,;"'1§!:} , ·¡"'hi "OC"."'D ~ 1 ïi l ~~~..& I ~ - .' I :~ \Þ lB7 -= \ ~ Ë~~ k\7 j::=: ~: .,.....::: - Jrn/ ! ~. rYll:.J..3'[. ~ " ,., ~_~ ~ 1- r".. ~ yA" rf TI I ~f- AG I (::_t¡=. --:- = ~ "L-rl I .-ïl T I I -p;~ ro' , f- ~ - ~ ~ - ríì - ~r: I ~ '-., ~ _1A"<~_~~~t \ T II If 1 - I ~ ~ fl t~: ~ - 'TI I 'i T T J -r-..: -~ II '1 T _ J . . ~ ~ . ~i f ~ ~ I ,- -~. I -~ . / LLl I i I T T 1--: - -, I I I I 1 f- , ~ , . -it,\ L R.~ '::1h p~i;·' "f._J...AIí£ -= ,Q:~ :f - I .,----- ~ II t ~ s.u.. .L'~ I III 1i:'-1 -"7+~' '~-"1:: " .-~I I I \¡ I _ _ I I~~ ò:J -~ ~ == N=1 IJ..þ: 2t:!,1L~~~¡= ,'1 , '1')-.. ~ '~~ MF - '- f---+--1 ~.~- ~ " .- I' (I r:rr "\ "" L ~ r - - _ ,......, ~ ~ '" DŒ"AL ... c wnw- '- , , ,/' ~ --' ~ _m r I !lIÞ~ 'ûJJII· =:; 1',............fP. I ~ F I .J> / \" ' >- ] =1.1 .1.' I Cr::J · IM:--~-'O ~ ........ ............ "P. , I~J i -=~~' TËR. li""øl!tU'o IJ&L.~S ~'..... ~', I,' ,'2.:-83 = ~W:r L. 'Z£.,. è,4-, S." '--, " ' , C , iŸ..... ; AP II~ 7I7t= j f' f d, I f I II ....,-~~ I / '" L ~ · J ~ .,/ , ..- , L .....~h" 1'V - :: r1~ ,r"·~l~ ~ -, I " " \ ~ , .. Q = H-Œ}-.I.!.! ~~~ ~ '\', ' I \ ~ \ ~:1\J=Y: C 1- ..~ .~~II:-- , " Þ-- .....- ~ffi1Iffi~ 0 .-.- .. I.... - , I , ~ ~ '~ I· I-~- '!L ,. . - \ . ~ __ ~ = MFAf',...,-g ~ ,'"- l)"'(l í I "J '==---, D" I"' ð.- ~.. MI. ~ ~ ! PS S'" 103 LR0, L .. ~~1....'1l ~ ~ ~:- ~I'""" -. .r'~ ..t ~ ~ : Fð~ ¿riP"" ~ð'''' : ~ -- ~ I ii!i~~ ...- ADftJ' .-; r; , , , I' ~(ù :: ~JttJi. ; C!,U,. ~ -- ..., ~~ao~ _,. ...., :;: -=,.L~~A~~'EW -,G- ' __;~-' \ ':- ¡ II"" ilCU.E¥ß ' is esC dø ,~-~ i I I i-~~~ i i=L-- # ~ I ~ Š I~\' /I","j I "'It ,L.-j!,'.1 -<~ ,_ : t..F-i.1·/tl ~==!t:::::i ~II., --hIT H:: LR LR ~ i Uti L ~~ i n r , /' ~~~,. '" - I L- -.- 11-· ~ ~ H ~.... -,--, ~'-If- aJtJ~. n::....: _ íT7L.. Ii.....!! ~ =-1 ~ ~ -.. 2F-9 L. I.... - PD I ~ II ~-.., -,---j _. -j. .....:: ~~ - Q-L~ ~ - ·H B+." = r I ~ I~I W ~----1 -+-1 - -1- :¡=~ = -Ú==- =~- USia , ~ - ~I ~H· 0 < ' ::r. ì --I II I -~ I FF= -- ~ C- -t-~~i-.' / = L,3ft, , !tH.....~ M -I ¡ J ~- ~ 1 ~ ." - .., , . L ....... ~ - ~ ~ . ,E;"'_ ~Ii'~~j T' \ : - À. ~, -.... · --:Tl - -. I It. "t -- rl '/. e I ~ i -L--L_~:~~J I r~ S2"~'L ~ ~ - ~--i _ I[ · ".,£ ___ I +1 - - l ,--... OWJV, PL I , 7 f rs 3-'(; ~ :: Ë:= ! _ L ~ -T-ït Hil ~' = ~ -L..-..- ='- 1 '. \ ++.!I ~IL: . ~ -r -gsl ~ - - ~- ~ rr~~a - J I' ~"' ts....~ tl.- ); . IF-12~ Ii ' I , r'f '- I ~ ~ Q · ~ 1ii: - -- ., ~ : ~ ð, , · ~ I ~ j I ~ ~~ IK,V r ---j- - --., r; , , , I ~.~ 12 L. - - - -....j--.j - 4'.... ... - 11 -+- ---0- \ / -' I i I ~ ~/~ 8'J.. '. ~:: ~ 4 ~~ = --- PDLR ( .. a ~I!.. Ii! -+4 :::- f~ l' ,I- ; Ijo. 'I~. I t,i:. )',.~ , 'IF"'" '- - -.I ~--.J r- I "'1 ~~ I 1111 IDA ~i >~~~ ' M~~ I,i';;, ri '--'~. lS~ C '" tr. t- =F -= ~ + I r·' - ~I J~ "r ~ ,Il. _"..s. 11.t:rJ."'I"1E1t.... .- ~ ---- '---- W_ LR * X -,J:: - - =c . J,I_ ---- S u. .. /"v"Y~ --....- "- _ =r= I I .. MF I I I' Page 4 ~ P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 Ie I I PS 84-8 APPROVED I I I I I lec I PS 84-9 APPROVED I I I I 7. PS 84-10 I I .~ I PS 84-10 APPROVED ~ Mr. Bronstad said that was correct. Ms. Nash made the motion to appro e PS 84-8. This motion was seco ed by Mr. Wood. Mr. Hannon said this pro erty does not have adequate fire Mr. Bronstad said are aware of that, but the w er lines are too small to a fire hydrant. Mr. Bron ad said they will need a percol ion test. rman Tucker said it would need to e stated that when fire coverage is available, they would tie on. The motion to approve PS 84-8 carried 5-0. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-9. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. Councilman Davis asked if they should have stated about the pro rata. Chairman Tucker said all engineer's comments must be complied with or waived by the Commission. Mr. Hannon said the collection of pro rata or requiring covenants is a staff function. The motion to approve PS 84-9 carried 5-0. Request of YMCA & Muhsen Shabout for replat of Lots 2R, 3R, & 4R, Block 11, Emerald Hills Addition. Mr. Bowen said the Commission has a letter from the Director of Public Works/Utilities requesting they sign a covenant for future improvements on Lynda Lane. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 84-10. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I II I I ~ I ~ r KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 11, 1984 i7 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-803, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS EMERALD HILLS ADDN., LOT 2, BLOCK 11, REPLAT, PS 84-10, GRID 114 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. 2. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 3. The existing zoning for this development should be noted on the plat. 4. The Surveyor's Certification Statement should be signed. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 11, 1984 PS 84-107 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 78021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I' e;ity of ~orth WchIand Hills Ie I . . ~..:. ~ it ~tar of the Metroplex I TO: Planning and Zoning Commission REF: PWM-0001-84 FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works DATE: January 9, 1984 I SUBJECT: Plats to be Considered in January I Replat of Emerald Hills - Lot 2, Block 11 The new lot numbers is Lot 2R, 3, and 4. All lots should have the letter R after them because all of the lots are being revised. I would like to also point out that Linda Lane is opened only b~tween Davis Blvd. and Tiffin Drive and a portion between Tiffin Drive and North Richland Blvd. is not opened or improved. Even the part between Davis Blvd. and Tiffin Drive is not a permanent improvement. I would recommend that the owners sign a covenant that they will pay for their portion of the street if and when it is improved. Some of the lot corners on this plat do not indicate any monuments, his surveyor has not signed the plat and one of the owners has not signed the plat. I I I Ie Richland Oaks 4th Filing - Lot 3R Strummer Drive shows to be only a 40 foot dedication at this location so I request another five feet be dedicated off of this lot. Also, the owner has not signed the dedication on this plat. I I Richland Terrace Addition - Lot 3R - l4R, Block 42A I recommend that you deny this plat for a number of reasons. The two main reasons are: 1. This is a portion of Lot 2, Block 42A and if a replat is to take place, all of Lot 2 should be replatted. 2. It also appears that there is a 6 1/4 ft. strip in the 60 foot right of way that this owner may not own and cannot dedicate as right of way. This plat does not indicate any monuments for the entire replat or the individual lots. I would suggest that this tract be surveyed and lot pins placed at the lot corners. I do not know what the owner intends to build on these lots but Lot lOR appears to not have enough depth. I I I I I f' Replat of Lot lRI and lR2, Industrial Park This replat appears to be in order. The city engineer may have further comments on these plats and he may mention things that I have missed. ~D W9-e Gene Riadle I (817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76118 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I~ I ,.. ,.. ( Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer TESCO Region Engr. Mgr. P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-10 Emerald Hills Addition, Block 11, Lots 2R, 3, & 4 Address or Location: The YMCA property on the east side of Davis Blvd. Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than January 11, 1984. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. J/ Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: ~FOOT EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES, AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED SKETCH. TESCO: / -- ...¡ - ~ ý ~. 9';'~~. p¿ i 2J~ {}~ DATE SIGNATURE CITY: DATE: December 30, 1983 SIGNATURE I' Ie I 'I I I I I -I Ie I I I I I ~'I I t- I ( Southwestern Bell First State Bank Blèg. Room 425 1901 Central Drive Bedford, Texas 76021 January 6, 1984 City of North Richland Hills, Texas Planning and Zoning Coordinator North Richland Hills, Texas Wanda Calvert, Reference to your letters dated December 30, 1983 and January 3, 1984, concerning the following; Replats - Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition 2R, 3, & 4, Block 11, Emerald Hills Addition Lots 3R thru l4R, Block 42A, Richland Terrace Addition Lots lR-l & lR-2, Block 6, Industrial Park Addition Request for a 5' Utility Easement as shown on attached plat on 2R, 3, & 4, Block 11, Emerald Hills Addition. There are no objections to the remaining plats. QUestions on these matters may be referred to Jimmy Clark on 267-6741. \ ?fl- ,;eJJ¿.:~..-- M.E. Williams Mgr.-Engr. (Design) H.E.B. Unit I I e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~ DATE: February 8, 1984 SUBJECT: PS 84-11 Replat of Block 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located on the west side of Strummer Drive and approximately 288 feet south of Grapevine Highway. All corrections have been made and they have agreed to pay the pro rata. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this replat. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO X ~t:4J- ~ e~~~&.:v- i " '.-- ~~~. AI'· %·Z81&3 t, j \ tt~3F'~'''~ I I I I' · .' PS I~...' I _:.' ~ I : ¡ C ~eÞ ~ ~ :; to" :f I i loa~~ ~ SIC.""\ ~ ¡ I I 5.¥. t I ~L_ '-><:. ~ i ~ i-I . I L ~c.tI ~S.U.. · a tit , . ~ - U ~ ~ " ., 7 '\ '. .i. "I ~1\.1,7Jl r--f / ' '-- ~ - · ¡ -;¡ .' I I J::¡' (':!:::ú~:Ì:rt: ,or ,.!,..C1 t ' I - ~ ff y A1 I Ell II T ~- AG' '\ I,~ ....-1-- :=: ~ 'L-n : I n¡ I I I , I .,., I 1"= F. p.~ Jt~1-- .- r 7 -".. tf I I I I "I " - I : 'j- ~ - ~ I "Eli' ~ ,'II 11_ I , ~ UR - 11 : " fT 'J::1~;::::ci ï'j I I: I = ..-_-_~J \ I ~ a ~ -1 j I I w) H ~Bll , ,l I I ..j, 1 ::: /' _--- V - II~ L R.~ I ' h Tf'~fr1: T II -l::;l.tJ.rßj"-S I 1 ::: I,' __~~ '-.. s. u. · ¡¿;:¡~ -s.J.J..1 I ' I I I i \ I , I I ¡~... I '-12~ e4'~~- I- , f . . . " M'~E:Rr. -:r n r-r-~~ fJ,rtþ: ,~,1~!~ ::: I lR ,tot :] AL-J '~-+-1,-'~j-~~"'" , I·MF r-r--E:1 r---:¡:::r---~ 1-!-2 r---, -.-...-" - · _T ::: ~' I MF LR ,~, ~ ~~ -+'-:r- ~t-f ~ : 2Fr-9 ~-- ÌI SU ~ ¡::::P"tJ.J..!.l trl=- \,-...... IF-7 ~F I +~." i : I , IA~ ps n-31~LI.ÍJ:::;L¡j]JTIqc r ...~..........~~ / ~. J +'~ I ....-~I .fi~r,¡I~a>~ rS84·,o .... ...... I l ~;;- IUI.I.S '1.-f't TÊR ~ ¡¥jt!"fUItt!Þ U II. L S ............. ........, I ( - tþ ,.. 'l., '.11 L. "ZI!., .,4-. s. u ........ " I , 1 ~......; lAP "" ':1i? - I I i ::., " .......' / :-"', \~ ,- - · I " f-·îrr.- .1"' ~ I-- ......."..., ' IV'....... !' ; ~ ~~:::::: \ I .\ \ IF-12 ~ > ~ t- :1/T'\J- ~-v~ ~~ , " \ \ ~ "- - - I . S.u. ~ ~J \ ~~:::: MFAf',lð-IO-S ~ '- \ COLLEGE. T!1f .. ' ð.oz;;;--faD MI . :::::.J P$S"o3 LR\-'... L I ~I ~ .-~ ~~o;r'~A,,·t.' ::: ~ ~ Fð)( App,J, E~, , J ' Þ- _ ::.... .., ~ \ .... -' , , ~ - :-... ~ - ~ . Od ~ ;= II~ ~&..eA"'t'~ ..__--- Ir - · ~.-- 1\,.1 _ I" ...,.' _ -: ~,. è ~I--u-: " i ¡ '¡ f- ~~ ¡ll-{,.-- -, 1" I ' J~~ 1 'S.~.'Dlø =L=![-! Î I - HTn--i::: , LR LR ' SJI · ,....../ó·R I ::. ~t- ..,:= MF L ,. . . I I .... ~ PD - IZ.I '. ,~,........ - ~:..1 F- ~ ::: ,~ n-I\ , .....,. rI ï ... - Ë~. ;:=:: :.~" :::~ ~'. 0 . ~î3~ . '.L . MF ./ ~ "" ~~~J.... -... ~ l ' ~~ TNBJe.AM'\ ~._~ -- -If, '. - IIItW I' .- IS¡ ~ :¡ rs,;-n3 >-- '-r-- ......: ...~". .....', '. no '- AP, I ~/,'tJ&2- It¡ ~"'VÅ.~' · .u.. -.... I UI !-t j n I '/ - ~ ',~ ,.u'v ð, 100. . ~ l------ I· .., n l I -......... '...., ,,_v.. 'r.., ~"&."., ~ þ ~, = ~t'!"~JI~~, ~\ -_= ->-0--1-- II .\++l1~IL. o...!Þ,e.s) ~ I j T J I..¿ i.l . ~'- It i- ~.- I-- _ ~ r! LIt.\. f1.....~ c: ",a I. I,f! LA I ~ - __ L- i: --= F? , - I fl. J. ~ _...-- II I:: r -.- 1--_ . . / ' ~ >-- ~ '" -~ ./ 4 I ~ _~ PO , ~ rr I a ...., .4 'aI1nã.& ')~ s.u~ ~ H <~ ~~ ,- - r- _f-- , i- I ~ LR h" " ~ L..4 Ie LR ..;:II J- ~ I--~Ii -.- -- , I I S.u . oil _ ~ "---- ~... 0{ J::::r:::. I- - - - ¡..... >-- - , I i 0 .~~ - - tIE -- ~ S.u. ...... H- '1II11r :w ~ ~ - ! I ~ _'L..~.... ~. \ ... .... __ ~:. (~!~ -. - I!~Þ ~ SJI ~ · ~ LR S.U....-.. LR ¡..... I' ~ .- \ I ~ ~ ~ '6! .~ L'~. I-- >-:: >- l"- e I -.. S U ~ '-";;; ï i- ~ ¡ ~ _ ~ .....( r, . at ~ I -r I S.I):O ....i.,¡., r i '"' ~ ~ ~ ~ '-'- .- \ I r-~ I ~~ rLJ- c -:::: i _ ~._I KI~"~C_I~""ST II -.:. ~.. I S ¡f C '--I ~ /E1t:m LR¡;:! :: \ S I ~ OI"Q t-oT~ "... I . þI. · 1 ~ .1 ... -I:'"'1..¡...... " j I~ L~~ · C·O "C S.U. · /".. C S.u. . , N'GIt...~ S.ÎJ. S.U. P..3·J4.-B3 ' 120 . / ~ ~I Vi-,!S" · ::---.......... . , ' I~ \ ~"., ~ tfU ~ ° \\1 ,.oDf,J. D/,. AtP. S-1"~ ~PS 83.. , ø-z.. . ~i ..I=,~~~ U:ps rza-4 ,k ~'~i~pw, j" 'l I~ - t.---- \.ØfS A.fl-I~ ~f~ t, IAft J. ,..tt., It ,0 """"lS Ø2·5~ +¡~'h'; I ~. re PDÀ. ' CA~W"'' ',! r I ' i \ F LR I j' " \ UUIIO JJ' . ""'lL..I ,. -§ 4- p~ Jj · 17 \ ~.tI~\'" :. J I ~ . ~c.~ Þ ~TS, AÞÞ,J. \ ps ,! r ~ I f J I:: '; L.. ~ IS.' 0 \AP. ~ li-~~ H'''''' I I ~W<I "--w . -\ A. P. I a ~I 14{8 ~ LR I aD, If; J I 'J\~þ \\ rMm~~ _t~),.: I I\... --.., -.eel , # I - ~ AG ~I '-' ~~II .----:: r$ 83 -, I 8 C.~£pell AptJ, '-. t; I e. I $, F. f, ~ -, . -. - . , I I Ie I I I I I --I lec I I I I I I I Ie I Page 5 ~ P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 8. PS 84-11 PS 84-11 APPROVED 9. PS 84-12 PS 84-12 DENIED (A Request of B & B Development Company for replat of Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition. Chairman Tucker said since this is a replat in single family zoning, there would need to be a Public Hearing. He opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this replat to please come forward. Dorothy Butler with B & B Development came forward. She said they want the two lots made into one for future development. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this replat to please come forward. Dr. Lynn Barnes, 5105 Pearl Drive, came forward. He asked what the purpose was for combining the two lots; what do they plan to put on the lot. Chairman Tucker said the lots are zoned residential. Dr. Barnes said the neighbors requests it stay residential. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hannon said there is pro rata due on Strummer Drive. MS. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-11. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of M-W Development replat of Lots 3R thru 14R Richland Terrace Ad n made the motion to deny because they did not submit construction plans for Winder Court and also they need to check the lot area to make sure they meet the multi-family requirement. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I \ ... i ~. KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 12, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-890, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RICHLAND OAKS ADDN., LOT 3R, BLOCK F, REPLAT, PS 84-11, GRID 124 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. The Owner1s Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this replat. . 2. Zoning Commission and Council Endorsement blocks should be affixed to the plat conforming to the format presented in the subdivision ordinance. 3. The existing zoning for this development area (IF-12) should be noted on the Plat. 4. A building setback line of 30-feet should be provided on Strummer Drive as required for IF-12 zoning. 5. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 6. The developer should be required to p~ his prorata share of the existing 6-inch water line in Strummer. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for a total length of 178.48 feet. January 12, 1984 PS 84-11 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .... I ~ Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 12, 1984 PS 84-11 PAGE 2 I .... City ot' ~orth ~ch1anh Hills I Ie ~tar of the ~etroplex I TO: Planning and Zoning Commission REF: PWM-0001-84 FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works DATE: January 9, 1984 I SUBJECT: Plats to be Considered in January I Replat of Emerald Hills - Lot 2, Block 11 The new lot numbers is Lot 2R, 3, and 4. All lots should have the letter R after them because all of the lots are being revised. I would like to also point out that Linda Lane is opened only between Davis Blvd. and Tiffin Drive and a portion between Tiffin Drive and North Richland Blvd. is not opened or improved. Even the part between Davis Blvd. and Tiffin Drive is not a permanent improvement. I would recommend that the owners sign a covenant that they will pay for their portion of the street if and when it is improved. Some of the lot corners on this plat do not indicate any monuments, his surveyor has not signed the plat and one of the owners has not signed the plat. I I I Ie I Richland Oaks 4th Filing - Lot 3R Strummer Drive shows to be only a 40 foot dedication at this location so I request another five feet be dedicated off of this lot. Also, the owner has not signed the dedication on this plat. I Rich1and Terrace Addition - Lot 3R - 14R, Block 42A I recommend that you deny this plat for a number of reasons. The two main reasons are: 1. This is a portion of Lot 2, Block 42A and if a rep1at is to take place, all of Lot 2 should be replatted. 2. It also appears that there is a 6 1/4 ft. strip in the 60 foot right of way that this owner may not own and cannot dedicate as right of way. This plat does not indicate any monuments for the entire rep1at or the individual lots. I would suggest that this tract be surveyed and lot pins placed at the lot corners. I do not know what the owner intends to build on these lots but Lot lOR appears to not have enough depth. I I I I I Ie I Rep1at of Lot IRI and lR2, Industrial Park This replat appears to be in order. The city engineer may have further comments on these plats and he may mention things that I have missed. ~o~ Gene Riadle (817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. LOOP 8201 P. O. BOX 186091 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS 76118 I I Ie I I I I I -I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ ( Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer TESCO Region Engr. Mgr. P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-11 Richland Oaks Addition, Block F, Lot 3R Address or Location: On the west side of Strummer Drive and approximately 288 feet south of Grapevine Hwy. Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than January 11, 1984. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. ~ Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: s- , It> FOOT EASE!'[¡ENT FOR ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTiON FACILITIES, AS SHO'~JN CN THE ATTACHED St\ETCH. L ~ ~~ð-vt I Jif~ ~ ?E TESCO: DATE I I S--~f SIGNATURE CITY: DATE: December 30, 1983 SIGNATURE I I Ie I I I I I -,I Ie I I I I I I I Ie II DATE: February 8~ 1984/-; SUBJECT: PS 84-12 Replat of Lots 3R thru l4R, Block 42A, Richland Terrace Addition DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located at the southwest corner of Maplewood Avenue and Cloyce Drive. All corrections have been made and they agreed to the Engineer's comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this replat. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x ~~,{?~v- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 4 ~ P & Z Minutes February 2, 1984 ~ 3. PS 84-12 DENIED 1/26/84 Reconsideration of the replat of Lots 3R thru 14R, Block 42A, Richland Terrace Addition. Mr. Stembridge came forward. He said he understood that the size of the lots and the zoning needed to be added to the plat which he has done. Mr. Stembridge gave corrected copies of the plat to the Commission. Mr. Hannon asked about the street running against the grade. Mr. Stembridge said the street will drain to the north to Maplewood. PS 84-12 APPROVED Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-12. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. 4. PS 84-15 Request of Service Centers of America for replat of Lots lR thru 4R, Bloc 5, Industrial Park Addition. Mr. Stembridge came forward He said they just needed to remo the utility easement on the cause they moved the sewer from the back of the property to e front. Mr. age said he had also shown the ng of the property on the pIa. He gave corrected plats to the mmission. PS 84-15 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 84-15. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P. M. CHAIRMAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I ,I I I I Ie I \. \ AIIIIIa. ~ KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas February 1, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-800, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RICH. TERRACE ADDN., LOTS 3R - 14R, BL. 42A, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, PS 84-12, GRID 122 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. The "new" existing zoning for this development (R-7-M.F.) should be noted on the plat. 2. The proposed 6-inch water and sewer lines should both be upsized to 8-inch diameter as required for Multi-Family zoning. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, pleas do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician February 1, 1984 PS 84-12 PAGE 1 !S!SO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I Ie I Page 5 ~ P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ~ 8. PS 84-11 9. Request of B & B Development Company for replat of Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition. Chairman Tucker said since th s is a replat in single family zo ng, there would need to be a Publi earing. He opened the Public Hear g and called for those wishing to peak in favor of this replat to pIe e come forward. Dorothy Butler ith B & B Development came forwar. She said they want the two lots de into one for future develop nt. Cha an Tucker called for those w shing to speak in opposition to this replat to please come forward. Dr. Lynn Barnes, 5105 Pearl Drive, came forward. He asked what the purpose was for combining the two lots; what do they plan to put on the lot. Chairman Tucker said the lots are zoned residential. Dr. Barnes said the neighbors requests it stay residential. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hannon said there is pro rata due on Strummer Drive. PS 84-11 APPROVED Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-11. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. PS 84-12 Request of M-W Development Company for replat of Lots 3R thru 14R, Block 42A, Richland Terrace Addition. PS 84-12 Drnrrn Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 84-12 because they did not submit construction plans for Winder Court and also they need to check the lot area to make sure they meet the multi-family requirement. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash. I' Page 6 .. P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 I Ie I I I I I "I le( I I 10. PS 84-13 I I I I I I I PS 84-13 APPROVED ("--- Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He said he was here to represent Stembridge Engineers who did this plat. Mr. Hedgcoth said they will submit plans for the street when they get approval by the Commission for the plat. Chairman Tucker said this is a replat, not a preliminary plat. Mr. Hannon said he could understand why Mr. Stembridge waited to see if he got approval of the plat; he did not want to spend the money if the Commission did not like the layout. Mr. Hedgcoth said they would be glad to list the lot area on the plat, but would like to know how the Commission feels about the layout. Mr. Hannon said the Subdivision Ordinance states a replat is to be handled as a final plat. Mr. Bowen said regarding item #1, the Commission feels they can not require them to plat property they do not own. The motion for denial of PS 84-12 carried 5-0. Request of U-Tex Development Compan for replat of Lots 6, Industrial Park Mr. Bowen made the ion to approve PS 84-13. Th otion was seconded by Ms. Nash the motion carried 5-0. 11. PZ 84-2 uest of John Cook to rezone Tract 11, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, and Tract 2A, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652, from their present classifications of Agriculture and Industrial to a proposed classification of R-3 (Single Family). This property is located on the south side of Cardinal Lane, bounded on the west by Sunny Meadows Addition and on the east by Mangham Airport. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I e IJr .~ '-, ~ I) Stembridge & Associates, Inc.. Consulting Engineers January 24, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland HilLs, Texas 76118 Re: Lots 3R thru 14R, Block 42A, Richland Terrace Addn., Replat, PS 84-12. In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated January 11, 1984, we offer the following comments: 1. The owner of the property on the east and south boundary of these proposed lots resides out of this country. Our office has contacted a banker and an attorney who represents him in an attempt to reconcile questions regarding his property. Neither the banker nor .the attorney kn~w how to get in_touch . with the owner. Our client bought this land in good faith and is_trying to get it replatted. We feel we have made a ' reasonable effort to contact the :adiacent property owner to. get him to. join in a Replat.. We do~,not believe that.this replat should be denied because we cannot contact an adjacent property owner who lives outsige this country. . 2. The existing zoning (M. F .) has been added to the plat'. ,3. ,Upon planning.andzoning approval ;of ,this replat complete.. paving construction plans will be prepared and submitted~for review ~nd approval. 4. All contiguous existing lot lines have been shown on this replat. 5. The developer agrees to upsize both the water and sewer lines to ,8-inch pipe. 6. Any additional fire hydrant coverage will be added to th~ final construction plans. 7. All requested easements have been shown on this replat. 8. street bores will be used in I I Ie I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~ \ ,. ./If there are any f~r"""'r questions ,~regarding th' lots, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ,DRS/bb cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, D1rector of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician I- I Ie I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 11, 1984 7 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Rich1and Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-800, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RICH. TERRACE ADDN., LOTS 3R - 14R, BL. 42A, REPLAT, PS 84-12, GRID 122 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. This rep1at covers only a portion of Lot 2, Block 42-A. We would recommend that all of lot 2 be included in this replat, and each section renumbered accordingly. 2. The existing zoning for this development (M.F.) should be noted on the plat. 3. Paving construction plans for Winder Court should be prepared by the developer's engineer and submitted for review. 4. All contiguous existing lot lines should be shown on the plat. 5. The proposed 6-inch water and sewer lines should both be upsized to 8-inch diameter as required for Multi-Family zoning. 6. Fire hydrant coverage does not appear to be adequate based on a 300-foot radius criteria for M.F. zoning. 7. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed rep1at in accordance with standard City procedures. 8. Open cuts for water line construction across Maplewood Drive will not be permitted without approval of the Public Works Department. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, pleas 0 not hesitate to call. January 11, 1984 PS 84-12 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I -, ... ( (L RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 11, 1984 PS 84-12 PAGE 2 I City &. ~orth ·chlan\i Hills I Ie tar of the ~etroplex I TO: Planning and Zoning Commission REF: PWM-0001-84 FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works DATE: January 9, 1984 I SUBJECT: Plats to be Considered in January I Replat of Emerald Hills - Lot 2, Block 11 The new lot numbers is Lot 2R, 3, and 4. All lots should have the letter R after them because all of the lots are being revised. I would like to also point out that Linda Lane is opened only between Davis Blvd. and Tiffin Drive and a portion between Tiffin Drive and North Richland Blvd. is not or improved. Even the part between Davis Blvd. and Tiffin Drive is not a permanent I would recommend that the owners sign a covenant that they will pay for their portion of the street if and when it is Some of the lot corners on this do not indicate any monuments, his surveyor has not the plat and one of the owners has not I I I Ie I Richland Oaks 4th Filing - Lot 3R Strummer Drive shows to be only a 40 foot dedication at this location so I request another five feet be dedicated off of this lot. Also, the owner has not signed the dedication on this plat. I I recommen that you eny t 1S reasons. The two main reasons portion of Lot 2, Block 42A and if a is all of Lot 2 should be 2. that there is a 6 1/4 ft. strip in the right of way that this owner may not own and cannot dedicate as right of way. This plat does not indicate any monuments for the entire replat or the individual lots. I would suggest that this tract be and lot pins placed at the lot corners. I do not know what the owner intends to build on these lots but Lot lOR appears to not have enough depth. 'I I I I I Ie I Rep1at of Lot 1Rl and 1R2, This rep1at appears to be in order. have further comments on these things that I have Park The city engineer may and he may mention (817) 281..0041/7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18809/ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I DATE: February 8. 1984 // SUBJECT: PS 84-13 Replat of Lots 1R-l & lR-2. Block 6. Industrial Park Addition DEPARTMENT: PlanninQ and ZoninQ BACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Browning Drive ~nd approximately 184 feet west of Rufe Snow Drive. There were no corrections that had to be made. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this replat. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat. BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: N{ A NO X J/~ {'~ c I fS BJ-2 AtiAOØIIf u.ta' <..1 &.-z. ,.p",~ , I.. I I' I Ie I I I I I I IJ I I I I I I I I I Page 6 ~ P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ~ Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Enginee came forward. He said he was her to represent Stembridge Engineers 0 did this plat. Mr. Hedgcoth sa they will submit plans for the treet when they get approval by t Commission for the plat. Chairman Tucke said this is a replat, not a preli ary plat. On said he could understand · Stembridge waited to see if he approval of the plat; he did not ant to spend the money if the Commission did not like the layout. Mr. Hedgcoth said they would be glad to list the lot area on the plat, but would like to know how the Commission feels about the layout. Mr. Hannon said the Subdivision Ordinance states a replat is to be handled as a final plat. Mr. Bowen said regarding item #1, the Commission feels they can not require them to plat property they do not own. The motion for denial of PS 84-12 carried 5-0. 10. PS 84-13 Request of U-Tex Development Company for replat of Lots lR-l & lR-2, Block 6, Industrial Park Addition. PS.84-13 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 84-13. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 11. PZ 84-2 Request of John Cook to rezone Tr 11, T.K. Martin Survey, A ct 1055, and Tract 2A, L.C er Survey, Abstract , rom their present c ìcations of Agriculture and Industrial to a proposed classification of R-3 (Single Family). This property is located on the south side of Cardinal Lane, bounded on the west by Sunny Meadows Addition and on the east by Mangham Airport. I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,.... i, r ~ TEÉLECTRIC ~>RVICE CDMPAIIY January 25, 1984 Ms. Wanda Calvert City of N. Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Ms. Calvert: Texas Electric Service Company agrees to relinquish all easements requested on Industrial Park Addition, Block 6, Lots lR-l & lR-2. WGS/mjg cc: R. L. Fain Sincerely {'f C S"tcv,,"':<' , . l,~ ".. L 1 "\ . Wm. G. Stewart P. E. Fort Worth Region Engineering P. o. BOX 970 - FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76101 - TELEPHONE (817) 336 _ 9411 I- I Ie I I I I I Ie I I i~ í f" I I 1 I :, ~ ~. r Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers January 23. 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lots l-Rl & l-R2, Block 6, Industrial Park Addn., Replat, PS 84-13. In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated January 12, 1984, we offer the following comments: 1. The~Developer has contacted TESCO and they are writing a letter to the City withdrawing their request' for any additional easements on this Replat. ' , If there are any further questions regarding ~hese .lots, pfeasedo not hesitate to call. Sincerely, DRS/bb cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director òf Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of,Public ~orks Mr. Greg Wheeler, <Engineering Technician I I Ie I I I I I -I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I " ( K NOWL TON-E NG LI S H-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 12, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-897, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION, LOT 1-R1 & l-R2 REPLAT, PS 84-13, GRID III We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, plea do not hesitate to call. , RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 12, 1984 PS 84-13 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ . ~ ...' ~~ " Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer TESCO Region Engr. Mgr. P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-13 Industrial Park Addition, Block 6, Lots lR-l & lR-2 Address or Location: South side of Browning Drive, approximately 184 feet west of Rufe Snow Drive Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than January 11, 1984. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. ~ Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: TESCO: DATE I - - ~,-- ~u ð f- {~. [{, V~{(~~ I fE SIGNATURE CITY: DATE: January 3, 1984 SIGNATURE -.2/'~ 12a~ I' I , I I I I I -I . I I I I I I I , I. DATE: February 8, 1984 " SUBJECT: PS 84-15 Rep1at of Lots 1R thru 4R, Block 5, Industrial Park Addition DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located at the northwest corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Industrial Park Drive. The only reason for this rep1at is to vacate some utility easements. All utility companies have agreed to this. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this rep1at. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat. BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/ A NO X {!~ ~~ I I I I I , c 1='C ....... '>~ AG I I r .... I I I I I I . I I I I I I I , I rage 4 P & Z Minutes ~ f February 2, 198.. { 3. PS 84-12 DENIED 1/26/84 Reconsideration of 3R thru 14R, Block Terrace Addition. Mr. Stembridge c e forward. He said he understoo hat the size of the lots and e zoning needed to be added to~ plat which he bas done. r. Stembridge gave corrected copies of the plat to the Commission. Mr. Hannon asked about the street running against the grade. Mr. Stembridge said the street will drain to the north to Maplewood. PS 84-12 APPROVED --------..- ......._....ao.. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-12. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. 4. PS 84-15 44·-'" ___..._____ ".___.. __._____ ___._____ Request of Service Centers of America for replat of Lots lR thru 4R. Block 5, Industrial Park Addition. Mr. Stembridge came forward. He said they just needed to remove the utility easement on the plat because they moved the sewer line from the back of the property to the front. Mr. Stembridge said he had also shown the zoning of the property on the plat. He gave corrected plats to the Commission. PS 84-15 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 84-15. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P. M. CHAIRMAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION I I , I I I I I I . I I I I I I I , I KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas February 1, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-897, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION, LOTS 1R-4R, BK. 5 REPLAT, PS 84-15, GRID 102 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We understand that the primary reason for this replat is for elimination of utility easements no longer required by the utility companies to serve this development. We have no objections to this procedure. 2. We would request that the new zoning for this development be noted on the plat, (1-2). Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, plea do not hesitate to call. . RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician February 1, 1984 PS 84-15 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I I r I I I I I 'I . I I I I I I I , I .. ,. ) TEÉfECTRIC ~)RVICE CDMPAIIY DeceIT~er 14, 1983 Wanda Calvert City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Ms. Calvert: This to affirm that Texas Electric Service Co. will not require an easement on the North/South property line common to Lots lR, 2, 3 and 4, block 5 of Industrial Park, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as shown on the attached sketch. (Ref. PS83-88) Sincerely, /c~ . ? ~~lL--J t?:vL Wm. G. Stewart, P.E. cc: J. H. Parsley, Att. P. o. BOX 970 - FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76101 - TELEPHONE (817) 336 - 9411 I ~-~ 1 ~ ~1 I~ r I I \LE I": 100' , I I I I ~ " L;/ C~C:J ·v I- ,~\" I . , I 0' I 'I I' I- I' , I / 110' "'t ,A... 0' ..~ .. - .----... . ;r / / / / ~ 27,029.40 SQ.'1: ~ ~<:;) II'i 0.6205 AC. ~ ~o /Š/C, ~ 2 - ~ ~ 1.1 140' ~~ ~ 111.j1.. N89°4S3SW ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~A~·t:J~8'J-8121.~80SQ.FT. C;' {f'''Ÿ 'V""" r J ~ 0.633 AC. -~ ~ ' ~«; .~ BLOC K 5 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~~ // -~ ~~ ,,~, /:~. 162,016.80 SQ. FT. ~ C:JV ..0" ¿.~. 3.719 AC. 0 140' ~ .~",. /,"J CI) N 89°45 35 W ~ ~~ Õ ~fJi.?Jþ.. --r.¡&), ~Tf'; Þ ~,~It 28,112,66 SQ. FT. ~ ...1.-. 0.645 AC. ~/ ,4 liP I rill,.) ~ /¡ l' 00 C"9:o0~~ . ?{r. ~ '<.~ "?' , 4 ·0 r--: en S FOOT EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION FACILJTIES, AS SHO'/JN ()N THE ATTACHED SKETCH. ~ ./ ~ ~/ /..#. ~/ ' ,~ STATE o~ TEXAS ~ . I l J ! ! 4 . I I ¡ J I I f I · I . ¡ . ¡ . I I r "I I II I I -I . I I I I I t- I , I (' (' Southwestern Bell 1901 Central Drive Room 425 Bedford, Texas 76021 November 17, 1983 Delbert Stembridge Suite 103 4028 Daley Ave North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Attention: HE: Block 5, Lots lH, 2, 3, and 4 Industrial Park Addition Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, Tarrant County, Texas. We agree to the abandonment of the 10' utility easement along the west property line of Lots 2,3, and 4 in Block 5 of The Industrial Park Industrial Park Addition, North Richland Hills, Texas. This location is for Commercial Development and agreements are being made with Builder to provide conduit to the street right-of-way along Rufe Snow Drive for Telephone Service. Any further questions concerning this matter may be referred to Jimmy Clark on 267-6741. ~ç.(,/~~ Mgr.- Engr. (Design) CC: City of North Richland Hills Planning and Zoning Dept 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 I I r I I I I I >1 . I I I -I I I I , I ~~~ (-', , \ Lone Star Gas Company HAROLD V. McKINNEY General Superintendent of Distribution ~ CJ r: '..: ) i~ : H f v'S JON 0 ¡ .' ; _' : F i ~~ t .: T ,( ì1 j 100 W. Morninglide Dr. · Fort Worth, Te.al 76110 November 22, 1983 1\1r. Delbert Stembridge Stembridge & Associates 402R Daley Snite 103 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 RE: 10' Easement Lot lR! Lots 2,3, and 4 Block Industrial Park Addition Dear :Mr. Stembridge: Pursuant to your correspondence of November 18, 1983, please be advised that Lone Star Gas Company does not have facilities located in the referenced easement. We o~fer no objection to the proposed abandonment of the same. If further information is required please advise. Sincerely, tf:¿ d!á¿~ A. E. FAUBION AEF:mlb CC: W. L. Simmel DATE: 2-8-84 /,7,1 v~" ¡ \,"./ I ~UBJECT: I" ' DEPARTMENT : .' North American Signs 'Request for Variance from the Sign Ordinanée Public ýJor:ks I This request is for a sign on'Rufe Snow for Wol~Nursery. Their request is BACKGROUND: . .. confusing'because they have asked for a 4 ft. by 40 ft. sign in the cover letter and I ~ I in the diag~am they show it to be 8 ft. by 20 ft. What they ar~ asking for is an . . 8 ft. by 20 ft. sign plus another sign ón the same'pole 5 ft. bylO ft. The smaller . . pc;>rtion would be a changeable message area." They are askipg- for a total of 2lD sq. ft. I I I I. I I I I I I I I- I of sign area and they are allowed by the ordinance to have only 135 sq. ~~. total. They could erect the 135 sq. ft. sign and put their message sign on the side of the building and be within the allowable sizes allowed in the ordinance. This would be safer because people would not bè traveling 40 m.p.h. or more on Rufe Snow trying ;1 to read a message sign. CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Recommend you turn down this, request. BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: ,~~ -----------------~--------------------------- ~~--~~--~~~-~-----~---- ~-~-~~-- ~-~-- I I I I 215 west garst street - south bend. indiana - 46624 - p,o box 30 - 219/234-5252 I I I I Ie I I I I I I I 're I nortïh amøriUBn signs February 2, 1984 Ms. Jeanette Moore City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Ms. Moore: Enclosed is a request for a variance as per our discussion. I plan to fly to Dallas to attend the variance meeting on Monday, February 13th, at 7:30 p.m. We do plan a single face sign which is 4 ft. by 40 ft. I believe that no variance is needed for that sign. If you lack any information or have any problem scheduling this variance for that meeting, please call me toll free at 1-800-348-5000. I have included a sketch of the sign and a plot plan showing where the sign would go and provided 8 copies for your convenience. Thank you for your help. NHY/jd I If If II II ¡I il I ~ II I; I ¡ il ¡I i I : I i I I i I I J ! Enclosures I I f' I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I- I REQUEST FOR \/ARIANCE FROl~ SIGN ORDINANCE RE: WOLFE NURSERY Located on Rufe Snow Road on the second lot south of Browning Drive immediately south and adjacent to Arby's Roast Beef location. We respectfully request the City Council consider granting a variance from the sign code restricting us to 135 sq. ft. of sign area to allow us a total of 210 sq. ft. of sign area as per the print attached~ DISCUSSION OF SIZE VARIANCE We feel we need this extra area for two reasons: 1. We prefer to include a changeable copyboard on which we can list special featured products, hours that we're open and special services offered. Research studies have revealed that 68.7% of the general public want special sale and pricing information from signs along their route, 60.5% want to know about special services offered and 6l.9% wish to know what hours a business is open for their convenience. We feel that it is in the public interest, as well as our commercial interest, to provide this information. Since it is a commercially zoned property. We feel it is appropriate to communicate in this way satisfying the desires of our customers and the general public for this needed shopping information. 2. When we deduct the 50 sq. ft. from the 135 sq. ft. we are left with only 85 sq. ft. for our main identification sign. This is not an adequate area to use our trademark and project our name far enough I I fI I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I- I -2- down the highway to allow a customer looking for our facility to make a safe entry. A motorist needs adequate time to identify the facility he's looking for, check his rearview mirror and side window for traffic that would prevent him from changi~g lanes, decelerate his car at an appropriate rate, signal and make a proper turn. The 85 sq. ft. on this particular highway does not afford us the viewing distance we need to obtain a safe entry by our customers. We, there- fore, respectfully request a variance to allow this portion of the sign to be l60 sq. ft. which will allow for a safe entry. We plan to tliscuss this issue in more detail and answer any questions you may have at the council meeting. GENERAL INFORMATION ON SIGNS The u.s. Department of Commerce, Small Business Administration advises business in a brochure attached that "most businesses regardless of size depend heavily on their signs. Signs are one of the most efficient and effective communication media available to the small business. Signs help people find you" ... it goes on to say "a sign must be noticeable." and "a sign must be readable." This is a commercial area. Information presented by Ray Anderson in the Economic Value of On-Premise Signs reveals that more than 60% of the public seek and appreciate information presented to them on signs in order to make them a more informed shopper and to make shopping more convenient to them. We feel that the variance requested here is reasonable. It does not change the commercial character ot the street or area. It does serve the general public' as well as our legitimate commercial needs to communicate. Perhaps most important I I I- I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I- I -3- the sign requested permits a substantially safer entry to our facility. We respectfully request an affirmative vote on the granting of this variance. Thank you for your time and effort spent in considering it. Submitted by, NORTH AMERICAN SIGNS, INC. NOEL H. YARGER, President I e t - SIw.rn 1 . .I b , 2l 'V . hits 19 E -..Nc I F drat..... -f_ i T c I 3 E d ,S,.IST W'A ii,A,t GO K NATE2 L A > ri A ia ms 1 c_ .� c .4_____ __ . _____t-- I 1 ,i ;Jyiiti.__ 4 c. I > REw is - sir\I ,...1:4 -; I I 1 , gam.„Di;,..? 13 yr CI Irg N. tie 7„; a_'..?, 41 •C' 0 ■'.:a T - - L- r ~~-1 :1 0_ /1 ~ \J\ .. o . - e_ N ~ @ f~ æ (c==)J @íV~ ~ L-v1J ~ [f-u-u l-~~ ,M= ca' 3 is¡ -.=-.. i = ! I I · I - I· I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I· I THE ECONOMIC VALUES OF ON-PREMISE SIGNS by Raymond T. Anderson A Report Printed and Disbibuted b}1 the , NATIONAL ELECTRIC SIGN ASSOCIATION as a Public Service Project I CHAPTER III I ' , _Types of Information I..,he Public Would Like To See on Signs I I I I I The Independentfs Problem I I. I I I I I I I I- Brand Consciousness 6 I In the public opinion surveys cited, as weB as in the Inuch greater bank of proprietary studies, the publiC' is very articulate in terlns of the kinds of information it would like to see dispJayed on, or adjdcent to, on-premise signing. This varies with the type of product or service sought by the shopper and offered by a particular business trade. It can also vary between the needs of the public as resident shoppers versus shopping in unfamiliar areas such as on a trip away from nome or in another part of a metropolitan area. The shopper \vants, and needs, to . know the name of the establishnlent, and very specifically what is sold at that place of business. Businesses that are a part of a large regional or national group, such as chain stores, franchise agents for fast foods or other products or services, or company-o\vned outlets of\vell-known brands, must use a uniform type wording and graphics to identify their businesses if they are to take advan- tage of the accumulated image and current advertising for that business. Sign restrictions which interfere with or restrict the use of these uniform graphics limit the value of the dealership, franchise operation, chain store or similar national/regional business. Independent competitors have even a greater problem in identifying their businesses to the public. The McDonald's arches type sign is so highly advertised there is no need to say "we sell hamburgers," but any independent competitor in that market, not having that advantage, nlust clearly identify not only the name, but also that it is selling that type of fast food if he expects to build awareness, which will attract the public looking for that type service. While the general public may not clearly understand the psychology behind it or be articulate on this subject, Dlany studies reveal that creativity of the on-premise sign can do a great deal to build a favorable inlage for that particular business. This type of graphic information i~ important to the public in deciding the "quality" of a particular establishment. Beyond these identification needs, the public is explicit as to certain kinds of information which would be helpful in shopping and in making buying decisions. Table 1\' summarizes four basic kinds of infonnation the public would like in regard to retail stores in general. TABLE IV Summary of the Types of Information the Public \\1ould Like To See Displayed on or Adjacent to the On-Premise Sign of Retailers in General Information Desired Vnaided Re~ponse .-\ided hesponse I. Brands'carried by the store 2. Sales/pricing information 3. Services offered 4. Hours of operation 41.4 38.2 38.9 21.9 ~ote: The above infonnation is in addition to the norma1 name identificr{tJon on th~ sign. \Ve are a society very much influenced by advertising and therefore most people are brand conscious. This applies to all types of products and I I I· I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I· I SUBJECT: 021 DATE: 2/13/84 Chan2e to Capital Improvements Progr~m DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: An a2reement with the City of Richland Hill~ h~~ hppn ~pp~nvøñ hy ~hø Council. Council authorization is requested to ~m~nd th~ C~pi~~l TmpTnvømøn~ Budget to include the followin2 expenditures for the constru~tinn nf Glpnvipw Drive. $ 21,866 180.000 30,000 6,300 120,000 $358.166 Sidewalks/Driveways in Richland Hi]]s, frnm rnn~Tihl1~inn~ bv businesses North Richland Hills Drain~g~, at 70~ nf p~~im~~øñ ~n~~l costs. from CIP funds. unspecifj~d prnjp~~~ Ri2ht-of-way Acquisition - Prop~rty in Nnr~h Ri~hl~nn Hills. from CIP funds. unspecifi~d prnj~r~~ Contin2ency Utility Adiustment - Lines in North Ri~h]and Hill~, frnm Revenue Bonds TOTAL CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve allocation nf $3~R,1~h in ~~p;~~l Improvement Pro¡ram from sources as indi~~t~d for rnn~~~I1~~inn nf ~lønviøu nr;vø BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N / A N/A NO N/A I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I .... DATE: 2/13/84 SUBJECT: Amendment to Speed Limit on Rufe Snow Drive DEPARTMENT: Police Department BACKGROUND: Careful consideration has been given to the traffic situation on Rufe Snow Drive and the following recommendation is made: 1) That the seeed limit be forty (40) miles ~er hour from the 5100 block through the 7400 block inclusive. 2) That the speed limit be thirty five (35) miles per hour from the 7500 block through the 7900 block inclusive. 3) That the speed limit be twenty (20) miles per hour for the school zone from the 6800 block through the 7000 block inclusive. Due to the fact that the five laned roadway has been completed and much of the new construction in the area has been finalized, it is in the best interest that traffic flow not be further impeded as to speed. A speed of forty (40) miles per hour is recommended as a prudent and safe speed for the 5100 through 7400 blocks of Rufe Snow Drive inclusive; the speed limit from the 7500 through the 7900 blocks of Rufe Snow Drive, inclusive, be set at thirty five (35) miles per hour due to the narrowing of the roadway into a two lane, unmarked condition. It is further recommended that the school zone be set at twenty (20) miles per hour from the 6800 block through the 7000 block due to pedestrian traffic on school da~s. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Attached Ordinance BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: N / A (l¥7: ~) .r- ~#;/,¿[J (~4~~"L¡r N/A I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 722 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIl\IIT OF 40 MILES PER HOUR FROM THE 5100 BLOCK THROUGH THE 7400 BLOCK OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE; ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 35 MILES PER HOUR FROM THE 7500 BLOCK THROUGH THE 7900 BLOCK OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE; AND ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 20 MILES PER HOUR FOR THE SCHOOL ZONE FROM THE 6800 BLOCK THROUGH THE 7000 BLOCK OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF A FINE NOT IN EXCESS OF $200.00; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DA TE WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has caused an engineering and traffic investigation to be made to determine a proper prima facie speed limit for the 5100 block through the 7400 block of Rufe Snow Drive; and a prima facie speed limit for the 7500 block through the 7900 block of Rufe Snow Drive; and a prima facie speed limit for a school zone for the 6800 block through the 7000 block of Rufe Snow Drive inclusive. WHEREAS, such investigation shows that the prima facie speed limit for the 5100 block through the 7400 block of Rufe Snow Drive should be 40 miles per hour; and the prima facie speed limit for the 7500 block through the 7900 block of Rufe Snow Drive should be 35 miles per hour and the primá facie speed limit for the school zone for the 6800 block through the 7000 block of Rufe Snow Drive inclusive should be 20 miles per hour. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. Ordinance No. 722 of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, be and is hereby amended by the adding of the 5100 block through the 7400 block of Rufe Snow Drive to Section 3.04 of said Ordinance and establishing a 40 mile per hour speed limit in the 5100 block through the 7400 block of Rufe Snow Drive; and Ordinance No. 722 of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, be and is hereby amended by adding the 7500 block through the 7900 block of Rufe Snow Drive to Section 3.04 of said Ordinance and establishing a 35 mile per hour speed limit in the 7500 block through the 7900 block of Rufe Snow Drive inclusive. 4þ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I 'I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. Page Two 2. Ordinance No. 722 of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, be and is hereby amended by the adding of the 6800 block through the 7000 block of Rufe Snow Drive to Section 3.05 of said Ordinance and establishing a 20 mile per hour speed limit in the school zone from the 6800 block through the 7000 block inclusive. 3. Any person operating a motor vehicle upon said described sections of Rufe Snow Drive, in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, at a speed in excess of 40 miles per hour where indicated, in excess of 35 miles per hour where indicated or in excess of 20 miles per hour where indicated shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not in excess of $200.00. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effective 10 days from passage and publication. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1984. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORr~1 AND LEGALITY: City Attorney I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I DATE: 2/13/84 ~i .-., c:;~/ ~:j SUBJECT: Northfield and Norich Park Projects Pay Estimate #2 DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The contractor has completed site grading; park roads and permanent buildings are now under construction. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: $145,370.16 Approve payment to Steele-Freeman in the amount of BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO General Obligation Bonds I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. .. KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 31, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 .North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-333. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NORTHFILED AND NORICH PARK IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2 dated Janu~ry 30, 1984, made payable to STEELE-FREEMAN. INC., in the amount of $145,370.16 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 25, 1984. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Greg Wheeler, as indicated by signature on the . estimate, and-we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $145.370.16, be made to STEELE-FREEMAN, INC.,at 990,Blue Mound Road, Ft. Worth, Texas 76131. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the February 13 Council Meeting to answer any' questions you may have concerning this project. RWA/llg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ~Mr. Dennis Horvath, Ass~stant C~ty Manager . - Mr. Allen Bronstad, ASs1stant D1rector of Publ1c Works Mr. Floyd McCallum. City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician STEELE-FREEMAN Inc. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I II i; ~ ff"i.:I'I' m I,; ( Ie I .'}:~ .. ;ø¡ ...--,' DATE: 2/13/84 SUBJECT: Walker's Branch Drainaae Improvements Partial Pay Estimate 15 and Change Order 112 DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: This contractor has comoleted the ma10r Ðortion of the concrete linin2 in the channel between Jerrie Jo and Jennin2s. This 10b is oro2ressina smoothly without oroblems. Three additional easements have now been obtained. makina it Ðossible to extend the channel imDrovements further to the south toward Bedford Euless Road. The cost esttmate for this additional channel work is $136.000. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Aoorove Ðavment to M.A. Vinson Const. Co.. in the amount of $54.064.61 and aDDrove Chan2e Order 12 in the amount of $136.000. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO General Obl12ation Bonds I·- I Ie I I I I I I I~ I I I ,I I I I Ie I, ... KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas February 6. 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 .North Richland Hills. Texas 76118 RE: 3-323. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HJLLS WALKER'S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.5. dated Febr~ary 6.1984. made payable to M.A. Vinson Construction Co...in the amount of $54.064.61 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 31. 1984. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative. Floyd McCallum. as indicated by signature on the ' estimate. and we have checked ·the itemextensi'ons and additions. We recommend that this p~ment. in amount of $54.064.61. be made to M.A. Vinson Construction Co. at P.O. Box 18520. Ft. Worth. Texas 76118. Along with a copy of this letter. the Contractor is being furnished I blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the February 13 Council Meeting to answer any' questions you may have concerning this project. C" RWA/llg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line. City Manager 7Mr. Gene Riddle. D;rector of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel. Director of Finance Mr. Greg Wheeler. Engineering Technician Mr. M.A. Vinson. Contractor SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 · 817/283·8211. METRO/287·33&7 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 30, 1984 Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assist. City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-323 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WAlKE~'S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 In accordance with your request we have prepared a Change Order to the referenced project for Council consideration of approval for continuing channel improvements downstream from the Chapman property to the Wiley property. This work includes channel improvements across the Earl Cribbs, Bruce Norris, and Carl Helm properties which were not included in the original contract. We understand that you now have obtained easements from each of these downstream property owners and written agreements have been made with each one covering the improvements included in the Engineer's Cost Estimate tabulation attached herewith. Items 1 through 35 listed in the attached Engineer's Estimate represent increased quantities of construction for items included in the original Contract based on Contract unit prices. Items 37 through 40 represent new construction items added to the contract based on estimated quantities and estimated unit prices -- we have not discussed this proposed change order with the contractor, therefore we do not have his proposed prices for these new items. This proposed change order includes additional earthen channel excavation from the Wiley property to the Chapman property; construction of concrete channel access ramps across the channel on the Earl Cribbs and Bruce Norris properties; an access ramp into the main channel for Public Works maintenance operations from Oakridge Terrace near the Chapman property; rock rubble riprap embankment protection at areas subject to excessive erosion; utility adjustments; and other miscellancous construction operations. Upon Council approval of this proposed Chan~e Order, we will prepare a formal Change Order form for the Contractor s consideration and signature. Based on our cost estimate of $136,000 for this change order, the total Contract amount will increase from $459,457.89 to about $596,000. The original amount budgeted for this project as presented in the 1982-1986 Capital Improvements Program report on pages 37 and 41 totals $1,430,000. January 30, 1984 WALKER'S BRANCH Page 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 - -- ------- ~. I I Ie I I I, I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. Walker's Branch CO. 2. continued Please call if you have any questions. RWA/ra Enclosures cc. Mr. Rodger N. Line. City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assist. Dir. of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler. Engineering Technician January 30 t 1984 WALKER'S BRANCH Page 2 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I' .... ---- . ----.-- . . "'-' -- .. I · r~"·, KNOWLTON-ENGlISH-FLOWERS,INC,: ENG I NEER I S EST I MA TE ' b~.~ '~I~ I~"\/I.. _....o.a.. OWNER: City of North R;chland Hills JOB NO.3-323 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Walker's Branch Drainage Improvements J-3 D ATE: ---ºl::lº=-ªL DESCRIPTION OF ITEM ITEM UNIT TOT A L UNIT COST NO. QUANTITY P R Ie E PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Unclassified Channel Excavatlon 1 C. Y . 3~910 10.90 $ 42.619.0C Controll ed Dens i tv Embankment 2 C.Y. 523 3.00 1,569.00 3000 PSI Unformed Concrete Channel 13 C. Y . 60 16 6. 40 9,984.0C 3000 PSI Access Ramp Cone. 15 C. Y. 69 250.00 17,25lJ.-mJ 3 D1a. Weep Holes 16 EArn 48 3.00 144.0C Setback 4' Hiah Chain t ink Fence 21 l . F 645 6.60 4.257.00 18" Rock Rubbl e Ri DraD 23 C. Y . 560 50.00 28,000.00 6" Rock Rubble Beddina 24 C. V. 187 35.00 6.545.00 10" Ductile Iron Sewer Pipe 30 L.F. 123 27 . 50 3.382.50 2500 PSI Concrete Encasement 33 C. Y. 15 110.00 1.650.00 4' Dia. Sanitary Sewer Manhole 35 EACH 1 1650.00 1 650.00 NEW ITEMS TO BE ADDED TO CONTRACT: 30" Dia. Cl. III RCP Stann Dra;n 37 L.F. 110 40.00 $ 4,400.00 30" Dia. Precast Cone. Headwa'ls 38 EACH 4 1000.00 4.000.00 Remove Reo 1 ace and Relocate Electric Patio t iaht on Bruc@ Norr; s Prooertv 39 L. F. 1 500.00 500 00 Remove. Reolace and Relocate Exist. 2" Dia. Water Line Across Channel at Bruce Norris Property 40 L.F. 140 20.00 2,800.00 I I . 4': REVIEWED & APPROVED: SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST - --- ~128 750.50 PLUS Co nt; ngen ci es ],,249.50 ~ ~A~ JJ.A j , , - PROJECT MANAGER . TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $136,000.00 I DATE: 2-8-84 I SUBJECT" Davis Blvd. 2.0 M.G. Elevated Storage Tank Partial Pay Estimate #11 . ", I I DEP ARTMENT : Utility BACKGROUND: This elevated storage tank is· 100% complete at this time and is I~ operating and in the systèm. This is not the final payment however~ we still hav~ the retainage on this job and after a final inspection of the job I the retainage'wil1 be paid. Since thïs job ran overtime there wili be)( liquidated damages deducted from the final pay. I I' I Ie I I: ! I I CIn COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: in the amount of $66,765.00 Approve payment to Universal Tank & Iron Works Inc., I I BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: I I I· I YES x NO Revenue Bonds . /J 1_ __ _ __~___________________..:._________________________.__ ___________________~_ I- ~. /' I I· I I I I I I I. I I I ·1 I I I I· I KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas February 6, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-540, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DAVIS BLVD. 2.0 M.G. ELEV. STORAGE TANK CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 11 . . Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 11, dated January 31, 1984, made payable to Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc., in the amount of $66,765.00, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 30, 1984. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Greg Wheeler, as indicated by signature on the e~t;mate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $66,765.00, be made to Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc., at P.O. Box 31156, Indianapolis, Indiana 46231. We would note that the Contractor has gone over the scheduled completion date of December 31, 1983. Liquidated damages have been set at $200.00 per day after substantial completion in accordance with the provisions of this Contract. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may e concern; n9 th is project. ~ ~F.~· ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/llg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ~Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Ronald J. Scott, Universal Tank & Iron SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I DATE: 2-8-84 I SUBJECT: I- ' DEP ARTMENT : II BACKGROUND: This job is about 90% complete but the contractor is being held up by a developer's contractor putting in a sewer line and sóme storm drain" t1.r lines for'" subdiv'ision. Morgan Meadows West Drainage Improvements Partial Pay Estimate 113 Public Works I., II I I I I- I I I I I I I I- I CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approve payment to M&D Construction Co., in the ::Imnl1nr of $5,974.69. BUDGETED ITE.t{: YES X NO :::::::_:::~__-~e:~::: ______________~___________________________ I I I- I I I I I I I- I I I .1 I I I I- I # KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas February 6, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-317(A), CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MORGAN MEADOWS, WEST, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3 I Enclosed is one copy of Contractor IS Partial Pay Estimate No.3, dated Febr~ary 6, 1984, made payable to M&D Construction Co., Inc., in the amount of $5,974.69, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of February I, 1984. The quantities and condition of the prOject have been verified on-site ~y your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estima'te, and we' have checked the item extensions a~d additions. We recommend that this p~ment, in amount of $5,974.69, be made to MID Construction Co., Inc., P.O. Box 8047, Fort Worth, Tx., 76124. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ,. RWA/l1g Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager />Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. David S. Humphrey, M&D Construction Co., Inc. SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 7e021 .817/283-8211 . METRO/287-3367 I I - I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SUBJECT: New Tractor and Mower DATE: d( February 13,1984 DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: On January 31,1984 at 10:00 A.M. bids were opened for the above mentioned equipment and are outlined below. (7 Bid Specifications were mailed , 1 picked up and 6 returned ) VENDOR Goldthwaites H. L. Peterson Co. Colonial Motors Clemons Tractor Trinity Equipment American Lift Truck & Tractor EXCEPTIONS o o o o AMOUNT NO BID NO BID $14,430.00 $11,926.17 $11,600.00 $10,406.70 This equipment will replace a unit that is worn out, and will be used for mowing City right of ways. The tractor and mower are both part of the 1983-1984 fiscal budget. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove the purchase of one tractor and mower from American Lift Truck and Tractor in the amount of $10.406.70. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO 01-60-04-6400 ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NOR TH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS I·, _at- of the "Metn:>plex I I~ INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: "' I Request For: Tractor & Mower Bid Opening Date: Januarv 31.1984 At 10:00 A.M. I Date: Requisition No. 11180 10:00 A.M. Sealed bids will be received until January 31,1984 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 I North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: ..Tonn tJhi ~n~v Phone: 281-0041 Ext. 187 ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL I 1 Tractor Model ¿Æ, j h ML .J Q.' (J ll- l Each ¡-i' 7. I ç¡ r ,-It I, I q ? Rotarv Cutter Model /""- ç LrC 1 Each qI'Ilfrl e, .J 'Ì q f-, OJ.ë.... L ~ l/ L;' 1'\,,- 7'" tA.., ~ 7- /~ / r-, 2,-- CJ."I Y J Warranty Offered Parts r. ~ ø AA 1$110 ~~ Labor ~~ , , eft) Unit Can Be Repaired At 'IJfJ/J /£ (,ððP 6~~C J. Location !J~ ~ JI&~ ÎYJ~ ¥ SUB·TOT Al J /J 1-1 C C '1' ~ ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID Ie ,~" l, .IL I I I I I I I I I TERMS % DAYS. F.O.B, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The C'ty of North R.chland Hills Purchas- ing Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- I-ies. or to award purchases on an individual item basIs when in i.ts Wtest interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES 10 BE E XCLUD· ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID. VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR, CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HilLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BIN~G CONTRACT. COMP AN Y: ./1~ ~ It I r" r- 7 A-~.. í~ "- BY: ____ PHONE NU SIGNATUR I /J7iY , . I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Ric~land Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are open~d and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated' for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of' form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best' interests of the' City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to tbis reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among otber reasons, for any of tbe following specific reasons: (8) (b) (c) (d) Proposal received after tbe time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. Proposal containing any irregularities. Unbalanced value of any items. Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation witb tbe City of Nortb Ricb1and Hills, or where sucb litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. I I Ie I I I I I 'I Ie I I I I I """I I Ie I j. DI'SQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation 1s contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, e~c. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6 . AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7 . ASSIGNMENT ' The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the wri.tten consent of the City of North Richland Bills City Mariager~ Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay ~imely performance (including actual or potential 'labor disputes). the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent. stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term ''brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . ...... (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal".description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if ~uch products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. (b) I I e' I I I I I I I Ie I I ! II I I I I" Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS EQUIPMENT BIDS 1. Equipment other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It 1s the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to tbe equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series identifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of equipment desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications may be acceptable provided such variation, in each instance, is noted on the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. 3. The unit shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the unit made ready for operation. 4. Bidder must fill in all information asked for in the blanks provided under each item. Failure to compietely describe the equipment may result in rejection of the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. s. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the equipment he proposes to furnish. 6. Manufacturer's standard warranty for parts and labor must be included in this bid. 7. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. / I I I Ie I I I I I SPECIFICATION FOR WHEEL TRACTOR This specification is intended to describe a general purpose Wheel Tractor with minimum equipment and features considered necessary to accomplish the desired results. Equipment offered must be new and of current design and regular production. Tractor lec I I I I I "'I I Ie I Engine: Diesel operated; Net IEHC HP-40; Dry type air cleaner; Horizontal (underslung) muffler and exhaust system; cold weather starting aid; direct electrical starting. 4 Ii Clutch: Single plate, dry type, 11" dia disc with "Dyna Life" or comparable lining material; foot pedal operated. 0,; "" ß'- e 'L ArtZ Transmission: Syncromesh; 8 speed forward; 2 speed reverse; pressure lubricated. (. () f'ot J or A I'Y ï "" l l!i .) ,." Power-Take-Off: Live; independently operated; 540 RPM; Rear 1-3/8" output shaft. () 1\ Rear Axle: Standard Ratio with manually operated differential lock; adjustable tread; disc wheels with 14.9-24 6-ply modified grader tread tires. 01£ Brakes: Rear only, hydraulic disc, wet type, individual or simultaneous operation; parking brake with warning light. OK Front Axle: Straight front axle with adjustable tread, disc wheels with 750 X 16 lo-ply tires., () 1\ Steering: Power or power assisted. 11, Hitch: Three Point, Cat 1 with draft cont~ol; swinging drawbar. of-'\. Electrical: Keyswitch cranking, safety starting switch, two headlamps; red tail lamp; two amber flashing lamps on rear. Olf Instruments: Ammeter; fuel guage; beat indicator; oil pressure guage; tachometer; hourmeter. #/\ . Seat: Upholstered; delux suspension. 011 Safety: ~S; §MY emblem o~ re~r; fe~rs over rear wheels. , I\. Y General: Color to be manufacture origin; operator and shop repair manuals to be furnished with equipment; estimated delivery date to be stated. Front counterweight to offset mower weight. 0" I I Ie I I I I I -'I I. I I I I I I I Ie I . \ SPECIFICATION FOR A FIVE FOOT ROTARY MOWER 1. Minimum five foot cutting width CJf( 2. special top link to relieve pressure off 3 point hydraulic 4t:.. 3. Minimum wieght at 550 pounds "k.. 4. Safety requirements: Ø/i A. Front and rear chain type deflection guards III B. Shielded or covered PTO drive line oA C. Rear tail wheel (rubber) solid 5. Warranty: Minimum of six months for defective parts and workmanship 01\ 6. Availability: Bidder must furnish date of delivery at the time of bidding 0(1 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I~ -I I Ie I . }'> ¡:'-- -.~ . . The undersigned here by offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the,t~rms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certi fy that our attached proposal submitted by AMr,..., , .,... '''F7 //l.....,. l' 7/1"".7...< /,,, complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland's bid specification, be it further specified that any non compliance with the ' City of North Richl nd Hills specifications is to be outlined in detail stating . ,sa i d vendors -4-[ except ions. And further unde st nd that th City of North Richland Hills acceptance' of any proposal om any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part there of. S· ~~ 7. Titl (~~(-ð' Da~ / ' ~4(1Jv- ltr- ~t (/ ~r~~. Campa ny Name THIS MUST BE SUBMITED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION. . ..·."'r,T. .. . .- "'';~~i:·· -.. . I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I ,I I I I I I Ie I ftnassey Ferguson MF= Massey Ferguson I I .ECT:, I· DATE: 2-8-84 Conn Dr. & Watauga Rd.' Pump Station Bids I DEP ARTME~: BACKGROUND: Utility. I .. I I I I I. I I I CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: I as follows: Item 1 - Smith Pump Co. Item 3 - BIF Vemco Equip. Co., Inc. I BUDGETED ITEM: I I I- I As you, can see from the engineer's letter, we have taken bids on updating . our two pump s·tations. This will give us a backup pump at Conn Dr. and '~lso give us more pumping capacity at Watauga Rd. st~tion~ . . This work is part of the ClP program and is recommended by the committee. Approve the bids as outlined in the eniineer's letter) $7,411.25; Item 2 - Asa Hunt, Inc. $12,762.00; $4,955.00 YES x NO ACCOUNT NUMBER:~ Bonds . ' ---------------~--~--------~--------------------------------------------------- I I I· I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I· I KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas Februa ry 3 J 1984 '~norable Mayor & City Council City of North ~;chland Hills 7301 H. i. Loop ()20 NQrth Richland ~ills, Texas 75118 Re: 3-500 CONN DR. PlJIfP PURCHASE AND WATAIJGA OR. fUMP ~E-WORK & METER-CONTROLLER CAPACITY INCREASE In accordance with your instructions, bids were received February I, 1984, on the referenced project and a bid tabulation is attach~d. This project includes the purchase of a pump to be installed at the t::onn Drive ;>Ul'lp station; also th~ purchaSt: and instal1ation of new rotating elements and motors on two pumps as well a~ purChase and installation of i:1eterinq and control CO'11Donents /!t the Watauga flrive PIli11p Station. The bid of $.'1Jith Pump Co. on Iteï:'1 1 is the best in all res~cts _ price, efficiency, and ti~e, and thus should be awarded to Snith Pu~p Co. for th~ hid of $7,411.2S. The single Mds received on Items 2 ð!')d 3 were fro";) tho. ct.)¡)pdrJi es ¡.¡h¡J are f¿¡ctory representatives of the ex1sti~g equi~me"t t~at is to be re-worked and thus are the best, and possibly the only local firms in position to handle these items. The amounts of their bids are in line wit~ our prior estimates, thus we recOMmend awarding Item 2 to Asa Hunt, Inc., for their bid of $12,762.00 and Item 3 to BIF/VEMCO Equipment Co., Inc., for their bid ~f $~,955.Ca. We will conti"ue with the separate contract r~q~fred to inst~11 thr: CO~~ Drive pump as Soon ðS you 8ward the Contract for Ite~ 1 abov~. As previously mentioned, there will "0 doubt be oth~r imprcvenants nee1ed dt both of these pump stations to adapt the;, for future demands, however, the best approach to these long range needs cannot be properly developed until the other potential supplies of t,<ater and thE! long ritnge demog"'Dhics of the City are resolved. We will be pleased to respond to any questions you ~ig~t have about these bids. ~ .. ~11' r.r:.. - RlK/ljc CC: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ~'r. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 4~ Te-US CCD\! FOR Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of PÛblic Works Mrs. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG,. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METR0/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I DATE: 2/13/84 ,~ SUBJECT: Resolution Calling an Election DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: This resolution is calling an election to be held on April 7th, 1984, for the election of Mayor, City Council Places 2, 4, G,and the appointment of election judges. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Resolution BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A NO N/A N/A I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I ~I I ~ I RESOLUTION NO. 84- te A RESOLUTION AND ELECTION ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, CALLING AN ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 1984, A.D., FOR THE ELECTION OF A MAYOR AND THREE (3) CITY COUNCILMEN OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, SETTING THE TIME, PLACE AND DATE OF SAID ELECTION, ESTABLISHING A DEADLINE FOR CANDIDATES TO FILE, APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES AND ALTERNATES, PROVIDING FOR THE TIME MANNER FOR VOTING ABSENTEE, BOTH IN PERSON AND BY MAIL, DESIGNATING WHO SHALL BE ENTITLED TO VOTE AT SUCH ELECTION, AND OTHER PROVISIONS OTHERWISE INCIDENT TO SUCH RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the City Charter of the City of North Richland Hills in Article V, "City Council," Section 3, "Date of Election," provides that the regular municipal election of the City of North Richland Hills shall be held on the first Saturday of April of each calendar year, and the same shall be conducted and the results canvassed and announced by the election authorities prescribed by the general election laws of the State of Texas, and said general laws shall control in all Municipal elections except as otherwise herein provided; and WHEREAS, the City Charter of the City of North Richland Hills in Article V, "City Council," Section 4, "Hours of Election," provides that the polls shall open at said election from seven o'clock a.m. until seven o'clock p . m.; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has, on its own motion, called said election and fix the date thereof and other provisions necessary in calling said election in accordance with said Charter and the laws of the State of Texas, providing for and governing such election. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of North Richland Hills, County of Texas, that said City election be called as aforesaid for the election of a Mayor and three (3) Councilmen for said City as provided by said Charter and as prescribed by the laws of the State of Texas; Section 1. That said election be held on the 7th day of April, 1984, A.D., as provided by the City Charter of said City, between the hours of seven o'clock a.m. and seven o'clock p.m. Section 2. Qualified persons may file as candidates by filing with' the Mayor, in the office of the City Secretary, between the hours of eight a.m. and five p.m., on or before March 7, 1984. Section 3. That said election will be held at the following place for the eleven (11) precincts in said City as recognized on January 1, 1984: Precincts 3072, 3209, 3063, 3049, 3177, 3041, 3214, 3191, 3215, 3140, 3289, - City Hall Council Chambers I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I Section 4. That the following named persons shall serve as Judges and Alternate Judges at the respective voting places: Ci ty Hall - If /. "/:;. ./.,') /1 ~. (.,l~{,l~"'VU: ..' t{..~~ /1-: 'l '~!) I ~ t:Cé '-~ ~-; i £l,.l~ If the regularly appointed Presiding Judge is unable to serve at the election, the Alternate Presiding Judge therefore shall serve as Presiding Judge. Such Election Judges shall choose such other election officers as the Judges may deem proper. Section 5. a. Absentee voting by personal appearance shall commence March 19, 1984, at 8:00 a.m., and shall continue through April 3, 1984. Such absentee voting shall take place in the office of the City Secretary in the City Hall. by paper ballot. (Room 124 shall be considered an extention of the City Secretary's office for absentee voting) b. Absentee voting by mail shall commence on March 19, 1984. The marked ballot must be mailed to the City Secretary in an envelope postmarked no later than midnight April 3, 1984, and must be received in the Secretary's Office before 10:00 a.m. on April 7, 1984. Section 6. All qualified voters residing within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, County of Tarrant, State of Texas, shall be entitled to vote at said election. Section 7. The election shall be conducted pursuant to the election laws of the State of Texas. The City Secretary is directed to procure voting machines, if available, for the election on April 7, 1984, and voting machines are hereby adopted as the method of voting at such election. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills this day of , 1984. ATTEST: Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney I I Ie -I I I I I I Ie I I I I I ~I I Ie I ."t~ - /' , ~' r,,; February 7, 1984 TO: Mayor and City Council North Richland Hills This letter is a formal request to be placed on the February 13, 1984. Agenda to discuss Walker Construction Company's operations. Sincerely, Mrs. ~e~ty Beck ,þ, /, ~~ ::§$({)/~ß11 ~- I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I , e .. DATE: 2/13/84 SUBJECT: Testin~ of Civil Defense Sirens DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The ei2ht Civil Defense Sirens previously approv~d by ~h~ Ci~y Council are bein2 installed and will be ready for testina individuAl]y during ~h~ week of Februarv 13th. The sirens are installed at the followin¡ lo~a~inn~! 1) Dawn Drive and Chartwell 5) Buckin¡ham Driv~ and W.A~.A11g.A Rn.Ar1 2) Rufe Snow Drive and Loop 820 6) Martin Driv~ And SimmnnA nT;VØ 3) Ken Michael Dr. and Deville Dr. 7) Davis Blvd. And PArk nriv~ 4) Emerald Hills Way and Newman Dr. 8) Dou¡las Lane and StArn~~ ROAd Every effort has been made to inform the citizens about thi~ prngr.Amj hnw~v~T, V~ expect that there will be numerous calls from peopl~ who Arp nor AW.AT~ ~h.A~ ~hø soundin2 will be a test. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: No Action Required BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A