Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1984-02-27 Agendas . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 27, 1984 - 6:30 P.M. I I' I I I I I. I I I I I I I f I For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Discussion of Flory Street Pro;ect and Assessments , -, 2. Assessments Discussion of Calloway Acres Proiect and Ai1 )' 3. Discussion of 1984 Capital Improvement Program ,A, \ \..1 , \'\ 4. Discussion of Cable TV 5. ~ Discussion of Revenue Sharing Handicapped Regulations 6. Other Items //) \ ",,_.,,_-' .' JÍ4,~ f:'U,i..~J:'{' ) ·C..Á"<·it'k · ( /:) id;) (\ f:1 t./I :::~ ¡_~' ,;:LLj . .I{ "f' /- . - --7" !-~ /--/'~' + ,.1 , ( 1'L>\;-'t"-;/ ( ....) /~I,., I {( { r ',.....' , ~-.,~....-.,' ..~.. . L. :.../~'. t" :,..,:. . '- I I. I For the Meeting conducted at the 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I NUMBER ,../'" ,-1/: Z"';-- -3: . 1("';' _:s--:/ .Jt: .~ 8. *9. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 27, 1984 North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, ITEM ACTION TAKEN Call to Order Roll Call Invocation Consideration of Minutes of the Emergency Meeting February 6, 1984. Consideration of Minutes of the Regular Meetin~ February 13, 1984. Consideration of Removin~ Item (s) from the '., Consent A2enda )~< Consideration of Consent A~enda Item (s) Indicated b 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, Consideration of A Commissions ~-l¡l ,I, --I c: /! < ,A í . J;"ô~'1 u~ c,v\J... ...)", /Yl~t~~~ LL(~ t ointments to Boards and PLANNING AND ZONING - PS 83-128, Reconsideration of Request of Martin Development for Final Plat of Lot 18, Block 1, Meadow Ridge Estates, Phase 2 (Located on the west side of Rufe Snow Drive across from North Richland Junior High School) I I. II For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 27, 1984 I II II I I I NUMBER ITEM PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 84-2, Request of John Cook to Rezone Tract 2A, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652, from Agriculture and Industrial to R-3-Single Family (Located on the south side of Cardinal Lane, bounded on the west by Sunny Meadows Addition and on the east by Mangham Airport) ACTION TAKEN .~ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-2 II I I II I I I I· II I ~~PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - 4IÞ PZ 84-3. Request of Carl Powell to Rezone Tracts 10 & lOB, J.C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from Agriculture-Specific Use to C-1-Commercial (Located at the southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Chapman) r~ # Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-3 *14. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-3, Request of Carl Powell for Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 26, Fox Hollow Addition (Located at the Southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Chapman Road) I I . I For I I I I I I Ie~ I I I I I I II I· I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 27, 1984 the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER .JI' ITEM / PLANNING 6. ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - ACTION TAKEN PZ 84-4, Request of Lucian Smith to Rezone a Portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from Agriculture to R-2-Single Family (Located on the south side of Douglas Lane, bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition and on the south by Windcrest Addition) Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-4 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 84-5, Request of Lucian Smith to Rezone a Portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from Agriculture to R-D-5-Duplex (Located on the south side of Douglas Lane, bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition, and on the south by Windcrest Addition) ~'Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-5 jJr; .- , . PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 84-7, Request of Bill Flories to Rezone Tracts IB & 3B, J.M. Crockett Survey, Abstract 273, from Agriculture to C-I-Commercial (Located on the west side of Davis Boulevard and bounded on the west by Smithfield Elementary School) I I e I For CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 27, 1984 the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, I 7301 N.E. Loop 820. at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM ~ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-7 ACTION TAKEN I I I I I ~ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 84-8, Request of Emory Bellard to Rezone Tracts 2B5, 2Cl, 2C2, 2C3, & 2C4, M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from IF-7 to R4-SD-Separate Ownership Duplexes (Located on the south side of Glenview Drive and approximately 120 feet west of Jackie Lee Street) I I I I I I I Ie I ILIIÞ ~ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-8 ~ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-9, Request of Charles D. Rutledge to Rezone Tract 12C, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from Agriculture to C-2-Commercial (Located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road) ~ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-9 *25. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-5, Request of Charles D. Rutled~e for Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 13, Meadowview Estates (Located at the northeast of corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road) I I e II For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I II I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 27, 1984 NUMBER :ur:' ITEM PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 84-10. Reauest of Mid City Pizza Corporation to Rezone Lot 1~ Block 10~ Snow Hei2hts North Addition from C-I-Commercial to C-I-Specific Use Sale of Alcoholic Bevera~es (Located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Meadow Crest Drive) ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-10 Gßt ~- ~ Consideration of ReQuest for Waiver of En2ineers' Comments Concernin2 Kin2swood Estates Phase III Presentation of 1982-83 Com rehensive Annual Financial Report and Mana2ement Letter 30. Consideration of 1984 Capital Improvement r~Jt~ Pro~ram ~Consideration of Florv Street Pavin~ & Draina2e Improvements ,_.{..r(. :rlf -~ Consideration of Calloway Acres Street 13 \L/ Draina2e Improvements '-f - ¿. *33. Consideration of Partial Payment. Estimate #12. Final, to Austin Road Company in the amount of $67.084.32 - Snow Hei2hts Street and Drainage Improvements 1- . · I . I For CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 27, 1984 the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I I I I I I NUMBER *34. *35. *36. *37. I I I I I I I ~ I *39. 40. 41. ITEM ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #1, to Panhandle Construction Company in the amount of $89,028.70 - Denton Highway Water System Extensions Consideration of Bids for Hot Mix Asphalt Consideration of Bids for Motor Fuels Consideration of Bids for One K.W. Emergency Generator Consideration of Ordinance Correcting the Zoning Map Consideration of Ordinance Authorizing the Micro-Filming of Various City Records Citizen Presentation: Gary L. Nickelson, Attorney Re: Doyne & Myrtis Byrd & Claude Byrd, Property located at 8017 Grapevine Hwy., North Richland Hills, Texas Adjournment I I~'t ~ I I City of J{8rth Richland Hills~ Texas ~~ .... ' ~/?f I 1,1, '~,I,__ - -_.~ \~~(/ f I I- I February 22, 1984 I To: Mayor Faram and City Council Members I From: Beverly Riley, Chairperson North Richland Hills Community Cable Advisory Panel Re: Recommendation of The Weather Channel I I The Cable Advisory Panel met in special session on Tuesday, February 21, 1984, at the request of CBS/Black Hawk Cable Corporation to view a video tape of The Weather Channel. This service originates from Atlanta, Georgia and presents national and local weather information. It will track any severe local weather systems. Ie I CBS/Black Hawk wishes to subscribe to this service, as part of the Basic Service, for its customers in lieu of the weather radar channel. The Weather Channel will fulfill the requirements set forth during the rate hike discussions in July, 1983. This service is more expanded than the weather radar channel. I Action Taken: The Cable Advisory Panel voted to recommend The Weather Channel to the City Council. I mse I I I I -- I (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I INFORMATION ONLY DATE: 2/27/84 SUBJECT: Federal Revenue Sharing Handicapped Regulations DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: Federal Revenue Sharing has long been one of the least restrictive Federal Grant Programs. However, an amendment adopted in 1983 placed new restrictions on revenue sharing and contains specific deadlines for compliance. Most of these deadlines pertain to auditing requirements, administrative matters, and public notices. The most significant requirement that the Council should be aware of involves a rather complicated self evaluation of policies and building facilities aimed at removing physical and other barriers to the handicapped. This self evaluation must be completed by October 17, 1984, and any needed non-structual changes to our facilities must be completed by that time. Also, by October 17, 1984, we must prepare a "transition plan" for any structual changes needed in our public buildings to accomodate the handicapped. These structual changes must then be in place by October 17, 1986. Dennis and I will be working the next couple of months with the State Commission for the Blind and the Handicapped Association of Arlington to assess our physical plant to insure compliance with the new federal regulations. A transition plan, with any needed structual changes, will be presented to the Council at the earliest possible opportunity. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: None BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A NO N/A I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I MINUTES OF THE EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP' 820 - FEBRUARY 6, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order February 6, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim Ramsey Jim Kenna J.C. Hubbard Dick Fisher Richard Davis Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Staff: Rodger Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Moore Rex McEntire Gene Riddle City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary City Attorney Director Public Works/Utility Press: Mark England Catherine Woodard Mid Cities Daily News Fort Worth Star Telegram Absent: Marie Hinkle Harold Newman Councilwoman Councilman 3. Mayor Faram stated he had several requests to speak on this item and would take them in order received. Mr. A.T. Cain, 9017 Valley View, appeared before the Council. Mr. Cain stated that originally there were four new homes built in Valley Park Estates and the restriction was 1,800 square feet. Mr. Cain stated these homes were built on the assumption that no smaller homes could be built. Mr. Cain stated he was not notified of the zoning change. Mr. Cain stated that when Mrs. Darlding wanted to build a house ~n two lots on Cain they were notified of the change. Mr. Cain stated that when they found out that houses were being built smaller than the required 1,800 square feet and they were not notified they felt something was trying to be put over on them. Mr. Cain stated that if the smaller homes were allowed to be built he felt their homes would be devaluated because the surrounding property would go down in value. Mr. Cain stated that Mr. Murray went down to where the houses were being built and the builder told him he was building 1,600 square feet houses. Mr. Cain stated that Mr. Murray called the City and an L\ CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSIDERATION AND ACTION ON ORDINANCE NO. 1086 CORRECTING A CLERICAL ERROR ON THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 1086 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I 1_ I inspector was sent out, and forty-eight hours later the builder was back at work on the lots. Mr. Cain stated the City was called again and the lady that answered stated she was sorry, but Gene Riddle was her boss and she had to do what he said. Mr. Cain stated it was odd to him that there were only two people that knew anything about it, that being Gene Riddle and the guy building the houses. Mr. Cain stated he had been advised that the zoning change had been published in the newsletter and advertised in the Mid Cities Daily News. Mr. Cain stated he checked the newsletter and did not find it. Mr. Cain stated he did not get the Mid Cities and if the City had anything to publish they should use a major newspaper. Mr. Cain stated that this had left a bitter taste. Mr. Cain stated he called several people and no one knew about it. Mr. Cain stated he also called some of the Council members and they had no idea what was taking place. Mayor Faram stated that what Mr. Cain was referring to was a zoning change and this was a total change to the entire Zoning Ordinance. Mayor Faram stated that to his knowledge it was properly advertised in the official newspaper of the City, which was the Mid-Cities Daily News. Mayor Faram stated that the reason the City used the Mid Cities was because of the tremendous difference in the cost of using the Fort Worth Star Telegram. Mayor Faram stated that no attempt had been made to put anything over on anyone, this was a zoning for the entire City. Mayor Faram stated that it was his impression that there was no attempt to change any zoning up or down, simply updating the Zoning Map and adopting it as part of the overall Zoning Ordinance. Mayor Faram stated he further had the impression that this was a clerical error and he was sorry it had occurred, but that was the reason for the meeting tonight to make sure that the Council felt it was a clerical error or take whatever action was needed to identify whatever the problem was. Mayor Faram stated that if corrective action was needed, take it. Mayor Faram stated that everyone was capable of human error. Mr. Cain stated that he felt if someone did not make a mistake, then they were not doing anything. COUNCILWOMAN HINKLE NOW PRESENT. Councilman Kenna stated that it was not the intent of the Council to downgrade any zoning, particularly residential zoning, with the zoning changes just made. Councilman Kenna stated there was a Lot of changes made, the new Zoning Ordinance was completely different and as the changes were made and the Zoning Map corrected apparently the wrong note was placed on the map on what existed on February 6, 1984 Page 2 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I the property in question tonight. Councilman Kenna stated everyone in the City was notified by the City's official newspaper that the Zoning Ordinance was being rezoned, but there was never any intent to re-do the zoning in Mr. Cain's neighborhood. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey advised Mr. Cain that he felt the reason he could not find anyone that knew anything about what was going on was because it was a clerical error on the map. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that it was not the Council's intent to change any zoning. Mr. Mary Enox, 6512 Parkway Ave., appeared before the Council. Mrs. Enox stated that construction began on two homes in the 6500 Block of Parkway with no permits and she called and notified the City. Mrs. Enox stated that construction was stopped because there were no permits and forty-eight hours later construction began again. Mrs. Enox stated that she was told that Mr. Riddle had issued the building permit. Mrs. Enox stated that the Building Code of the City stated that if a permit was issued in error it was void. Mrs. Enox asked if the permit was issued in error was it void. Mr. McEntire stated that if the permit was issued in error it was indeed void. Councilman Davis stated that the Zoning Ordinance, Section 29, 2.4 stated that issuance of a building permit did not waive any provisions of the Zoning Ordinance or any other City Ordinance, and a permit issued in error would be void ab initio. Mr. Paul Cook, 6263 Basswood, Fort Worth, appeared before the Council. Mr. Cook stated he was a partner with J & P Building Corporation and they had a house at 6516 Parkway that would be completed in about a week. Mr. Cook stated that Article 2.6 of the new Zoning Ordinance stated that replacement of the new Zoning Map corrected drafting or other errors or omissions in the prior Official Zoning Map, but no such corrections shall have the effect of amending the Official Zoning Map. Mr. Cook stated he could understand the builders position on this, but could not understand the City Officials' stand when they were notified of the sub-standard housing, size-wise. Mr. Cook stated the subdivision had no streets, curbs or gutters and problems with septic systems. Mr. Cook stated that at the time he applied for a building permit he had to get his pert test and everything approved by the County. Mr. Cook stated that when the County Agent saw the size of the February 6, 1984 Page 3 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ II Lot he made them stop construction on the house and upgrade the Lot, even though the pert test was good. Mr. Cook stated that from a builders standpoint he would appeal to the Council to take all these things into consideration. Mr. Cook stated he felt 1600 square feet would devalue what was already there. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Cook when he started construc- tion and the size of the house he was building. Mr. Cook stated the house was 1,900 square feet and when he bought the Lot he was told there was an 1,800 square foot restriction. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Cook that if it was his opinion that the houses should be 1,800 square feet. Mr. Cook replied yes. Councilman Kenna stated that Section 2.6 referred to a replacement of the Zoning Map and he did not think what had occurred fell under that category because it was a new Official Zoning Map and not a replacement. Mr. Cook stated that was true, but the reason for the new map was not to change the zoning. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that the City had been advised late today that the County had turned down the pert test on the lots in question tonight. Mr. Gary Watson, 6520 Parkway, appeared before the Council. Mr. Watson stated he had built his house four years ago and it was 2,300 square feet. Mr. Watson stated he thought he was protected by the Zoning Ordinance and it was a real shock to the people in the area when this all happened. Mr. Watson stated that when he came to the City Hall to check on the houses under construction the people in the Zoning Office knew nothing about it. Mr. Watson stated he was informed there had been no zoning change on the property. Mr. Watson stated the City Inspector knew nothing about the construction. Mr. Watson stated he was told that the man over the office, Gene Riddle, had made a mistake and everyone was sorry, but there was nothing anyone could do about it. Mr. Watson stated as homeowners they were real concerned that the City could do nothing about the situation. Mr. Watson stated it had been very soothing just being able to come down and talk to the Council about the problem. Mrs. Janet Cain, 9017 Valleyview, appeared before the Council. February 6, 1984 Page 4 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mrs. Cain stated that she had lived in the area for thirteen years. Mr. Cain stated her house was one of the older houses in the area and was smaller than 1,800 square feet. Mrs. Cain stated that when she tried to get construction stopped on the lots in question she got no where and did not feel the neighbors should have to suffer for someone's error. Mrs. Cain stated she had talked with Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey several times and appreciated his time and help. Councilman Davis asked if there were five lots in question that someone was trying to get a permit on. Mr. Line stated yes, there was a meeting last week and the builder indicated that he had taken his planning and potential sales to the point that he would be damaged financially on three of the lots if he were not able to continue with the plans. Mr. Line stated it was agreed to give permits on three of the five lots and the builder agreed to build 1,800 square feet or larger on two of the three lots. Mr. Dan Offield of Dan Offield Custom Homes, appeared before the Council. Mr. Offield stated he was the one causing all the flack, but he thought it should be recognized first and be aware to the homeowners that it was not Dan Offield Custom Homes that caused all the flack, it was the City. Mr. Offield stated that in December, 1983, before he purchased the lots, he met with Mr. Riddle about the pro-rata on the water and Mr. Riddle told him there would be no pro-rata. Mr. Offield stated he also asked Mr. Riddle what the new changes were going to be in that sub-division and he said that because of the size of the lots that they did not meet City standards per Lot size for an 1,800 square foot house it was going to be downgraded to 1,600 square feet. Mr. Offield stated he waited to purchase the lots until the Council approved the Zoning Map, which was approved on January 9, 1984. Mr. Offield stated he met with Mr. Riddle after the meeting and he assured him there would be no problem with the 1,600 square feet, after that he secured the lots and proceeded to obtain building permits. Mr. Offield stated he went to the County for the pert test. Mr. Offield stated that Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey had said the permits had been denied by the County, but he was not aware of the denial. Mr. Offield stated that the people were trying to put the monkey on his back and he would like it clarified that the City made the mistake. Mr. Offield stated he had agreed to work with the City as he had not asked to build five 1,600 square foot homes. Mr. Offield stated that on Lot 8, 9 and 10, 1,800 square foot homes would be built. Mr. Offield stated that the forms were set on Lot 11 for a 1,856 square foot home which would be his February 6, 1984 Page 5 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I personal home. Mr. Offield stated he did the site work before he obtained a permit because Mr. Bill Rice had advised him he could do site work without a permit. Mr. Offield stated he was trying to build good homes that would be compatible with what was already in the area. Mr. Offield stated he had been shut down on Lot 11 on a house that was 1,856 square feet and the house was legal by all the City codes. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Offield what was the smallest plan he had designed. Mr. Offield stated the forms set on Lot 10 was for 1,650 square feet. Mayor Faram asked what the expense would be to add 150 square feet to the house. Mr. Offield stated approximately $40.00 a square foot. Mayor Faram stated that the houses in the area were selling for $47.50 a square foot. Councilwoman Hinkle asked what was set on the five lots. Mr. Offield stated the forms were set, piers drilled and the plumbing was roughed in. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Offield if he had a buyer for Lot 10. Mr. Offield stated no. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Offield when be began construction. Mr. Offield stated he began construction on Monday. Councilman Davis asked when he took out the permit. Mr. Offield stated the letter was signed by Mr. Line on January 31, 1984. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Offield how many houses he had permits for. Mr. Offield stated he had permits for Lots 10 and 11. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Offield why he was shut down on Lot 11. Mr. Offield stated he did not know. February 6, 1984 Page 6 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. Riddle stated Mr. Offield had been shut down because he did not get an inspection on the steel. Mr. Riddle stated that the County had cancelled the permits on the septic tanks and that revoked the building permit until the problem was cleared with the County. Councilman Davis stated he felt Mr. Offield had done everything he was supposed to but there was a mistake made on the map and it was never the intention of the Council to downgrade any of the residential zoning in the City. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Offield what he had planned for Lots 8 and 9. Mr. Offield stated that on Lot 9 he planned 1,686 square feet and Lot 8 he planned to have 1,650 square feet. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Offield if he planned 1,800 square feet for Lot 11 and over 1,800 square feet for Lot 12. Mr. Offield stated that was correct. Councilman Fisher asked Mr. Offield how much work he had done on Lots 9 and 12. Mr. Offield stated he had the dirt work done. Councilman Fisher asked Mr. Offield if he still contented that 1,650 square feet was all he could build on the lots. Mr. Offield stated he had already bid the house at 1,685 square feet. Councilman Fisher asked Mr. Offield if he had proposed 1,650 square feet for Lot 8. Mr. Offield stated he had proposed 1,650 square feet on Lot 8, which was for his partner. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Offield if he had a contract on Lots 8 and 9. Mr. Offield stated he had a verbal contract. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey, to approve Ordinance No. 1086. Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if the Ordinance was approved if it would correct what had been judged a clerical error. Mr. McEntire stated yes. February 6, 1984 Page 7 I. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Councilman Davis stated he wanted the homeowners to know it was not the Council's intent to lower the residential zoning but in fairness to Mr. Offield he would be willing to let him proceed with Lot 10, but lots 8, 9, 11, and 12 would need to be 1,800 or more square feet. Councilman Davis stated he did have a permit for Lot 10, there was some question of whether the permit was issued in error. Councilman Davis stated he did not know if that would be fair or not because the ordinance was very clear that if something was given in error the permit was void. Mr. McEntire stated that was not the problem, the error was on the part of whoever issued the permit and at the time it was given it was not an error. Mr. McEntire stated that if the Council took action on the proposed Ordinance to clear up the Zoning Map, then there was no error involved. Councilman Kenna asked what alternatives could be taken if the Ordinance was approved. Mr. McEntire stated there was problems but felt it could be cleared up. Motion to approve carried 6-0. Mayor Faram adjourned the emergency meeting to executive session. Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council and Staff were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. Mayor Faram adjourned the February 6, 1984 meeting. February 6, 1984 Page 8 ADJOURNMENT BACK TO ORDER ADJOURNMENT I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - FEBRUARY 13, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. 1. I Mayor Faram called the meeting to order February 13, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim Ramsey Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle J.C. Hubbard Jim Kenna Harold Newman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Moore Rex McEntire Richard Albin Gene Riddle John Whitney Press: Mark England Catherine Woodard David Doremus 3. Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary City Attorney City Engineer Director Public Works- Utility Purchasing Agent Mid Cities Daily News Fort Worth Star Telegram Northeast Chronicle The invocation was given by Councilman Davis. 4. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the January 23, 1984 meeting. Motion carried 7-0. 5. Councilman Davis removed item 116 from the Consent Agenda. 6. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. . ,ç CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 23, 1984 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING .ITEM (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF to CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (8) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (112, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 & 30) APPROVED I' I 7. Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I 1 1 I I Ie I Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Steve Harrison, Attorney, 4708 Holiday Lane West, representing Mr. Gene Huggins appeared before the Council. Mr. Harrison stated that Mr. Huggins desired to put a Honda Dealership at this location. Mr. Harrison stated the Planning and Zoning Commission had denied the request because they wanted a more restrictive C-2 Zoning, which was the zoning now under the new Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Harrison stated he made application for the C-2 zoning and was advised they would have to wait six months because the request had been denied. Mr. Harrison stated they checked with the City Attorney to see if this was required and because the six month period was critical to them, they asked for an appeal hearing. Mr. Harrison stated they had met with the property owners and tried to alleviate all their concerns. Mr. Harrison stated he felt the commercial zoning would be more compatible than the present zoning of multi-family. At this time the Council was presented with a slide presentation. Mr. Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Hedgcoth stated they had met with the property owners in the area and their main concerns were traffic, a buffer area and the general safety of the residents. Mr. Hedgcoth stated they planned to construct a concrete six foot fence on the north-south property line. Mr. Hedgcoth stated the traffic would enter the lot along the west bound lane of Loop 820. Mr. Hedgcoth stated there would be no drive access from the lot on Susan Lee to the east or to Cloyce Street to the west or Short Street to the north. Mr. Hedgcoth stated there would also be twenty-four hour security on premises and there would be no one entering the northern portion of the property after 6:00 p.m. Mr. Soloman Peterson, Architect, 16816 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, appeared before the Council. Mr. Peterson stated the dealership had been designed to be as compatible as possible with the surrounding residential property. Mr. Peterson stated that some of the concerns of the property owners was the lighting, however the directional lighting was away from the residential area. Mr. Peterson stated the PA System would be designed to a number of small boxes throughout the building to keep the sound away from the residential property. Mr. Peterson stated they had talked with the property owners and addressed their concerns and hoped that all was satisfactory. February 13, 1984 Page 2 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - PZ 83-66, REQUEST OF GENE HUGGINS TO REZONE BLOCK 42C AND LOT 21R, BLOCK 5, RICHLAND TERRACE ADDITION FROM MULTI- FAMILY AND 1F-9 TO COMMERCIAL (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NORTHEAST LOOP 820 FRONTAGE ROAD AND BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY CLOYCE DRIVE) I' I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I Mr. Steve Harrison appeared before the Council. Mr. Harrison stated their primary concern was Mr. James Wilson, the property owner that would be the one most affected and Mr. Huggins had made the following commitments to Mr. Wilson: 1. There will be no drive access from the auto dealership to Susan Lee Lane; 2. The service area will be closed and locked at or before 6:00 p.m. each day; 3. There will be a twenty-four hour on-premises security to protect against theft and vandalism; 4. All lighting will be directional lighting only designed to provide light only in display areas and to minimize diffused light on adjacent property. A majority of the lighting will be cut-off during off-business hours and only minimum security lighting will remain on during off-business hours; 5. The exterior public address system will be mounted such that all speakers are directed away from residential areas to mute the effect on adjacent property owners. No buzzers or bells will be used on the exterior public address system; 6. The north-south fence on the back property line of adjacent property owners will be concrete fence with a painted brick pattern toward the residential property side, at a height of either six foot or eight foot, as determined by a consensus of the property owners; 7. The side-yard fence running south-easterly along the side-lot line to Mr. Wilson's property will be a six foot concrete fence with a painted brick pattern toward Mr. Wilson's property to the front building line of Mr. Wilson's residence; from the front building line southeast to Susan Lee Lane the property line will be landscaped with shrubs from three foot to four foot in height and small trees sufficient to provide a visual barrier; and, 8. Landscaping with shrubs and small trees will also be provided on the tracts' frontage to Susan Lee. Mr. Harrison stated that Mr. Huggins wanted him to express to the Council that the name of the dealership would be North Richland Hills Honda and would employ local people. February 13, 1984 Page 3 I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Harrison if he understood that the property would fit in the new zoning classification of C-2. Mr. Harrison stated yes, that was what they wanted. Mr. James Wilson, 4705 Susan Lee, appeared before the Council. Mr. Wilson stated that based on the commitments that had been made, he would be in favor of the rezoning. Mr. Billy Griffin, 4801 Susan Lee, appeared before the Council. Mr. Griffin stated that he had talked with the property owners in the area and four of them on Susan Lee were in favor of the rezoning and he would ask the Council to approve the request. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to please come forward. Mrs. Linda Sutphin, 5012 Mary Anna Way, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Sutphin stated that she was not in opposition to the rezoning of the property to commercial, but was against the type of development being proposed. Mrs. Sutphin stated there were several dealerships in North Richland Hills that backed up to commercial developments and not in a residential area. Mrs. Sutphin stated she was not contacted about the rezoning change. Mr. Alf Brekke, 5020 Mary Anna Way, appeared before the Council. Mr. Brekke stated he did not feel the dealership would last, that there had been dealerships in the City that only lasted a short time. Mr. Brekke stated it would add more traffic in the area. Mr. Brekke stated he had no objections to the way it was going to be built, but did not think it would be a lasting thing. Councilman Kenna stated that as alternatives, the property could become apartments or a shopping center. Mrs. Dorothy Porter, 4928 Mary Anna Way, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Porter stated she was for commercial development, but did not want a car dealership. Mrs. Porter stated she felt it would cause more traffic in the area. February 13, 1984 Page 4 I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I II 8. I I I I I Ie I Mrs. G.S. Osborne, 5014 Mary Anna Way, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Osborne stated that no matter what was built on the lot it would add more traffic. Mrs. Osborne stated a dealership would make Grapevine Highway and Davis Boulevard, which was already unbearable with traffic, more hazardous. Mr. Eric Lilley, 4906 Mary Ann Way, appeared before the Council. Mr. Lilley stated that he was against the rezoning because of the lights and the noise the loud speakers would cause. Mr. Charlie Banks, 5022 Mary Anna Way, appeared before the Council. Mr. Banks stated he had no objection to the rezoning, but would rather have a professional building that would have a lower noise level. Mr. Banks stated he felt the dealership would lower the values of the property on Mary Anna Way. Councilman Fisher asked Mr. Banks if he was concerned about the traffic in any way. Mr. Banks stated no, the only concern he would have as far as the traffic would be on Short Street. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Mayor Faram advised the Council that this was an appeal hearing and would require a 3/4 vote. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve PZ 83-66, Ordinance No. 1087. Councilman Davis stated that because of the concerns of the homeowners he would like for the motion to include the commitments that had been made by Mr. Huggins and have them attached as part of the Ordinance. Councilman Kenna and Councilwoman Hinkle agreed to the commitments being a part of the motion and Ordinance. Councilman Davis asked what would be on the property by Short Street. Mr. Harrison stated it would be landscaped with trees and shrubs. February 13, 1984 Page 5 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-66 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 1087 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Councilman Kenna stated that several speakers indicated they were in support of the commercial zoning and once a commercial zoning was given there were many things that would be less attractive than a dealership. Councilman Kenna stated that multi-family could be built on the property and he felt with the commitments that had been made, everyone knew what would be placed on the property with the C-2 zoning. Mr. McEntire stated that from the standpoint of objections, he had noticed that there were not any objecting to the commercial zoning only the car dealership. Mr. McEntire stated that he wanted to point out that the Council was not voting on a dealership but the C-2 zoning. Motion carried 7-0. 9. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Kirk Nance, 1100 Greenpoint Circle, Fort Worth, appeared before the Council. Mr. Nance stated this request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission August 12, 1983 and was denied by a tie vote. Mr. Nance stated the main reason the Commission denied the request was because of the footage requirements for a sign on this property and he did not feel the footage should have been a bearing in the zoning case. Mr. Nance stated that the property to the west was industrial and the property to the east was zoned commercial. Mr. Nance stated that the last time he had reviewed the Zoning Map it showed the property in question to be zoned industrial. ' Councilman Kenna stated he understood that the request shown on the plat, which exists, is to the center line of Loop 820. Mr. Nance stated yes, from the center line of the railroad to the center of Loop 820. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mr. Nance how he could request a rezoning change when he did not own the property. Mr. Nance stated he had authorization from the railroad for the rezoning and also had a lease on the property from the railroad. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposi- tion to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. February 13, 1984 Page 6 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - PZ 83-54, REQUEST OF M & W INVESTMENTS TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 4, T.K. AKERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 19, FROM AGRICULTURE TO INDUSTRIAL (LOCATED ON THE RAILROAD PROPERTY NORTH OF NORTHEAST LOOP 820) I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 10. Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if the applicant could represent the railroad as ownership and seek this change in zoning. Mr. McEntire stated the applicant could if he had a lease, but he had never seen the lease. Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if it was within the legal rights of the Council to pass this zoning based on what had been presented. Mr. McEntire stated he would advise the Council not to approve the request. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to deny PZ 83-54, Ordinance No. 1088. Motion carried 7-0. 11. Mayor Faram stated he had a request from Mr. Phillip Barnett to speak on this request. Mr. Phillip Barnett, 2813 Michael, Mineral Wells, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barnett stated there were a number of items in the Engineer's letter that needed to be taken care of. Mr. Barnett stated that items #1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were all corrected. Mr. Barnett asked that the Council approve the request. Councilman Kenna asked if the Staff and the City Engineer were satisfied with the answers provided in the February 7, 1984 letter. Mr. Albin stated he had not seen the letter, but had spoken with Mr. Barnett about stopping site distance at the intersection of Fox Hollow and Chapman. Mr. Albin stated that Mr. Barnett had done some calculations and felt he could meet the criteria. Councilman Kenna asked if everything else was satisfactory. Mr. Albin stated yes. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked the Staff and Engineer if all requirements had been met. Mr. Riddle stated yes. Councilman Davis stated that the City Engineer had stated that the Consulting Engineer had agreed that a l~ foot cut would help, did that mean they were going to do that. Mr. Line stated it was not planned. February 13, 1984 Page 7 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-54. DENIED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-125, REQUEST OF WAYNE STEWART FOR FINAL PLAT OF BLOCKS 13 THRU 25, FOX HOLLOW ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHAPMAN ROAD, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY RICHFIELD PARK) APPROVED I I Ie I I I I *12. I I I Ie *13. I I I *14.' I I I I Ie I Mr. Albin stated they were going to meet the existing street grade on Chapman. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to approve PS 83-125. Motion carried 6-1; Councilmen Kenna, Newman, Hubbard Fisher, and Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey and Councilwoman Hinkle for; Councilman Davis voting against. February 13, 1984 Page 8 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-1, REQUEST OF B & M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR FINAL PLAT OF KINGSWOOD ESTATES, SECTION 3, (LOCATED NORTH OF STARNES ROAD AND BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY EXISTING KINGSWOOD ESTATES) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-2, REQUEST OF JACK COOK FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 5 & 6, BLOCK 1, MOLLIE B. COLLINS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ODELL STREET AND WEST OF SMITHFIELD ROAD) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-9, REQUEST OF DAVID BARFIELD FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 3, BLOCK I, MARTIN ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD, BETWEEN AMUNDSON ROAD AND MARTIN DRIVE) APPROVED I I Ie I I I -I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I *15. 16. Councilman Davis stated it was his understanding that on a replat of a single family residential lot there had to be a public hearing. *17. Mr. McEntire asked if there was a public hearing at the Planning and Zoning Meeting. Councilman Davis stated yes. Mr. McEntire stated that was sufficient. Mrs. Dorothy Bulter appeared before the Council. Mrs. Bulter stated that at one time this was one lot and they wanted to make it back into one lot for future development. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to approve PS 84-11. Motion carried 7-0. February 13, 1984 Page 9 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-10, REQUEST OF YMCA & MUHSEN SHABOUT FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 2R, 3R & 4R, BLOCK 11, EMERALD HILLS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AT LYNDA LANE) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-11, REQUEST OF B & B DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR REPLAT OF LOT 3R, BLOCK F, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STRUMMER DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 288 FEET SOUTH OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-12, REQUEST OF M-W DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 3R THRU 14R, BLOCK 24A, RICHLAND TERRACE ADDITION (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MAPLEWOOD AVENUE AND CLOYCE DRIVE) APPROVED I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I *18. *19. 20. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to deny the variance. Mr. Noel Yarger, North American Signs asked to speak. Mayor Faram advised him that this was not a public hearing, but if the Council had no objections he would let him speak. Mr. Yarger stated that his company represented Wolf Nursery in asking for the variance. Mr. Yarger stated the sign he wanted to put up was a sign that was a total of 210 square feet. Mr. Yarger stated that one reason he wanted to appear before the Council was because of the freedom of speech amendment of the Constitution. Mr. Yarger stated that the amendment pertained to the fact that if the speech was commercial did not eliminate it from the protection of the First Amendment. Mr. Yarger stated he understood the need for sign codes and signs were very important to businesses. Motion to deny carried 7-0. February 13, 1984 Page 10 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-13, REQUEST OF U-TEX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR REPLAT OF LOTS lR-1 & 1R-2, BLOCK 6, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BROWNING DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 184 FEET WEST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-15, REQUEST OF SERVICE CENTERS OF AMERICA FOR REPLAT OF LOTS lR THRU 4R, BLOCK 5, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION (LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE) APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF NORTH AMERICAN SIGNS REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM THE SIGN ORDINANCE DENIED I February 13, 1984 Page 11 I Ie *21. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM APPROVED I *22. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING I ORDINANCE NO. 722, SPEED ZONE ORDINANCE, ESTABLISHING SPEED I ZONE ON A PORTION OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE APPROVED I *23. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #2, IN THE I AMOUNT OF $145,370.16 TO STEELE-FREEMAN - NORTHFIELD PARK I PROJECT APPROVED *24. CONSIDERATION OF Ie PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #5, AND CHANGE ORDER 112, IN I THE AMOUNT OF $54,064.61 TO M.A. VINSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - WALKER'S I BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED I *25. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, I ESTIMATE #11, IN THE AMOUNT OF $66,765.00 TO UNIVERSAL TANK & IRON WORKS I INCORPORATED - ELEVATED STORAGE TANK APPROVED I *26. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, I ESTIMATE #3, IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,974.69 TO M&D CONSTRUCTION Ie COMP ANY - MORGAN MEADOWS WEST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I *27. *28. *29. *30. 31. Mayor Faram advised the Council that on page two of the Resolution the name Mrs. Aline Parker should be inserted as Judge and Mrs. Rolan Storkey as Alternate Judge. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Resolution No. 84-6. Motion carried 7-0. 32. Mrs. Sherry Arnold, 6821 Linma Lane, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Arnold stated the neighbors had some problems with Walker Construction Company and would appreciate the Council's consideration. Mrs. Arnold stated that in the Code of Ordinance it stated: February 13, 1984 Page 12 CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR TRACTOR AND MOWER - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR CONN DRIVE AND WATAUGA ROAD PUMP STATION APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 84-4, GLENVIEW DRIVE (ADDED AS AN EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE JANUARY 23, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA) APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 84-5, EMINENT DOMAIN - ENGLER PROPERTY (ADDED AS AN EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE JANUARY 23, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA) APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION CALLING AN ELECTION FOR APRIL 7, 1984, FOR THE ELECTION OF A MAYOR AND COUNCIL PLACE 2, 4, 6 AND APPOINTING AN ELECTION JUDGE. APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 84-6 CITIZEN PRESENTATION RE: WALKER CONSTRUC- TION COMPANY'S OPERATION - MRS. BETTY BECK - 3801 SCRUGGS DRIVE I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I February 13, 1984 Page 13 Section 2-62; Consideration of zoning matters - The City Council shall consider matters referred by the Planning and Zoning Committee only after the following steps have been taken: All Property owners within 200 feet of the property to be rezoned shall be notified in writing, by depositing such notice, properly addressed and posted, in the U.S. Mail at least ten days prior to the planning and zoning hearing, stating the time and place of such hearing. Mrs. Arnold stated the notice was placed in the Mid Cities News and was told it was not feasible to notify everyone of the proposed changes because of the massive changes. Mrs. Arnold stated the City of Richland Hills was in the process of the same type of city-wide changes and was planning a mass mailing to notify their residents. Mrs. Arnold read the following: Charter of City of North Richland Hills, Article VI, Section 6; City Attorney "He shall approve the legality of every ordinance before it is acted upon by the Council." Mrs. Arnold stated her question was that if he knew we were not notified was it a legal matter that was acted on. Mr. McEntire stated what the City passed was a new Zoning Ordinance and simply followed the State Statues. Mrs. Arnold stated that in the Charter, Article XVIII, Section 17, it stated: The City of North Richland Hills shall have the power to prohibit the erection or construction of any building or structure of any kind within the City of North Richland Hills without a permit first having been issued by the City for the construction or erection of such building or structure, and may authorize a fee to be charged for such permit. Mrs. Arnold stated there was a suit brought against Walker Construction Company for not getting a permit. Mrs. Arnold stated the case had died because of the lack of prosecution. Mrs. Arnold stated she would appreciate the Council's consideration on this matter. Mr. McEntire advised Mrs. Arnold that the case was still pending and was set for April. Mrs. Arnold stated it was her understanding that Walker Construction had been rezoned under the new Zoning Ordinance to 1-2, which permitted the following: I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 17.2 Permitted uses .1 Manufacturing and assembling operations of commodities except Large steel structures. 17.3 General Conditions .1 District area requirements: (b) Minimum frontage: Every parcel of land within this district shall have at least fifty feet of frontage on a public street. 17.4 Special Conditions .1 At lease ten percent of the lot shall be maintained in permanent open landscaped area. All landscaping shall be properly maintained throughout the life of any use of the lot. 17.5 Environmental Standards .1 In this district normal business activities conducted shall not create a sound pressure level on the bounding property line that exceeds 75 decibels A scale. Mrs. Arnold stated she wanted to know when she could expect the ordinance to be enforced against Walker Construction Company. Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Arnold if she was reading from North Richland Hills Ordinances. Mrs. Arnold replied yes. Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if he concurred. Mr. McEntire asked Mrs. Arnold if she was talking about the new Zoning Ordinance. Mrs. Arnold replied yes. Mr. McEntire stated he would have to amend the City's plea. Mrs. Patricia Pettet, 3736 Kris, North Richland Hills, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Pettet stated she would like to thank the City Council for spraying for mosquitos last summer. Mrs. Pettet stated she would like to know when the drainage job between Kris and Charles would be finished. Mr. Albin stated it should be completed in less than a month. Mrs. Pettet stated she was still having cat problems and wanted to know what she could do. Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Pettet if she had discussed the problem with the Animal Control Officer. February 13, 1984 Page 14 I I Ie I I I I 33. I I Ie I I 34. I I -I I Ie II Mrs. Pettet stated yes and was advised nothing could be done about it, there was no cat ordinance. Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Pettet if she had talked with the Animal Control Officer recently. Mrs. Pettet stated no. Mr. Line advised that the new Animal Control Ordinance became effective October 1, 1983 and did cover cats. Mrs. Pettet asked if she could put out cat traps. Mr. Line stated the Animal Control Officer had traps available and if she would call she could pick one up. Mr. Line advised the Council that the new Civil Defense Sirens would be tested during the week of February 13th at the follow- ing locations: 1) Dawn Drive and Chartwell; 2) Rufe Snow and Loop 820; 3) Ken Michael Drive and Deville Drive; 4) Emerald Hills Way and Newman Drive; 5) Buckingham Drive and Watauga Road; 6) Martin Drive and Simmons Drive; 7) Davis Blvd. and Park Drive and 8) Douglas Lane and Starnes Road. Mr. Line stated every effort had been made to inform the citizens and he wanted to inform the Council in case they received calls from citizens that were not aware of the testing. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of February 13, 1984. February 13, 1984 Page 15 PRESENTATION BY CITY MANAGER - TESTING OF CIVIL DEFENSE SIRENS ADJOURNMENT I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: DATE: 2/·27/84 ~ppointment to Civil Service Commission Administration Due to the recent resignation of Mr. Ed Szol, a replacement is needed. /, '. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: Appointment to Civil Service Commission YES N/A N/A NO N/A I~ I Ie I I I I I Ie I I I I I 1 il Ie ~I 4' City of Xðrth Richland Hills, Texas TO: Rodger Line City Manager DATE: February 23. 1984 FROM: Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Zoning & Platting Cases for City Council February 27. 1984 PS 83-128 DENIED BY CC 1/9/84 Reconsideration of request of Martin Development for final plat of Lot 18. Block 1, Meadow Ridge Estates, Phase 2. PZ 84-2 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of John Cook to rezone Tract 11, T.K. Martin Survey. Abstract 1055, and Tract 2A, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652. from their present classifications of Agriculture and Industrial to a proposed classification of R-3 (Single Family). This property is located on the south side of Cardinal Lane, bounded on the west by Sunny Meadows Addition, and on the east by Mangham Airport. PZ 84-3 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Carl Powell to rezone Tracts 10 & lOB, J.C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from their present classification of Agriculture-Specific Use to a proposed classification of C-l (Commercial). This property is located at the southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Chapman Road. PS 84-3 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Carl Powell for Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 26, Fox Hollow Addition. (817) 281-0041n301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 I, Page 2 I Ie PZ 84-4 APPROVED BY P & Z I I I PZ 84-5 I APPROVED BY P & Z I I Ie PZ 84-7 APPROVED BY P & Z I I I PZ 84-8 APPROVED BY P & Z I I I I Ie I Request of Lucian Smith to rezone a portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of R-2 (Single Family). This property is located on the south side of Douglas Lane, bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition and on the south by Windcrest Addition. Request of Lucian Smith to rezone a portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of R-5-D (Duplex). This property is located on the south side of Douglas Lane, bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition, and on the south by Windcrest Addition. Request of Bill Flories to rezone Tracts IB & 3B, J.M Crockett Survey, Abstract 273, from their present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of C-l (Commercial). This property is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard and bounded on the west by Smithfield Elementary school. Request of Emory Bellard to rezone Tracts 2B5, 2Cl, 2C2, 2C3, & 2C4, M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from their present classification of IF-7 to a proposed classification of R-4-SD (Separate Ownership Duplexes). This property is located on the south side of Glenview Drive and approximately 120 feet west of Jackie Lee Street. I~ Page 3 þ I Ie PZ 84-9 APPROVED BY P & Z I I I I Request of Charles D. Rutledge to rezone Tract 12C, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of ,C-2 (Commercial). This property is located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road. PS 84-5 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Charles D. Rutledge for Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 13, Meadowview Estates. PZ 84-10 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Mid City Pizza Corp. to rezone Lot 1, Block 10, Snow Heights North Addition, from its present classification of C-l (Commercial) to a proposed classification of C-1-Specific Use Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Meadow Crest Drive. ~ I I I I I I I I_ I I I Ie I I I -I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I I DATE: February 23, 1984 r SUBJECT: Reconsideration of PS 83-128 Final Plat of Lot 18, Block 1. Meadow Rid2e Estates. Phase 2 DEPARTMENT: PlanninQ and Zoning BACKGROUND: This prODertv is located on the west side of Rufe Snow Drive across from the North Richland Junior Hi¡h School. This case was denied by City Council on January 9th since there had been no drainage study made. Since then, a drainage study has been submitted and Richard Albin has reviewed it. The corrections have been made to the plat. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the plat and waived item #7 of the Engineer's comment letter dated 12/7/83 regarding the need for an extension of the existing 6 inch sewer line because Mr. Bronstad stated that Mr. Martin stubbed out for this lot when he put in the utilities for his subdivision to the west of this lot. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of final plat. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO ~~~ x I I I I' I I I I IF - 8 lee I ItS 3&-2 CIAÞØcf ~tI' .1-., 8."1. I :p~ · I I I I' I~ 1\ I I I- I 'I I ') ~ I 'I Ie I I -- II :1 I ~ I- I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas February 23, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-962, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES, LOT 18, BLOCK 1, SUBMITTED AS (JOHN VANDUSEN ADDITION) DRAINAGE PLAN, PS 83-127/8, GRID 129 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We have no objections to the proposed drainage plans for development of this lot. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician February 23, -1984 PS 83-127,8 PAGE 1 SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 I I Ie I I _________ I ~ I I I Ie I I I I I I I I· .~ t ( January 9, 1984 Page 3 .-" ,.- ~-- PL~ZONING - --::- ~_ _ _---PS" 83-124 , REQUEST OF -. SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR FINAL PLAT OF FOSTER VILLAGE, SECTION ELEVEN (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE EXISTING FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION) *10. ~,'# I ...-- ~- ~---.__.- -.... -----' ----- 11. Mayor Faram advised the Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval, but the City Staff had recommended denial. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to deny PS 83-128. PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-128, REQUEST OF MARTIN DEVELOPMENT FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 18, BLOCK 1, MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES, PHASE 2 (LOCATED ON WEST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE, ACROSS THE STREET FROM NORTH RICHLAND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL) DENIED Councilman Davis asked if a drainage study was required for this one lot subdivision. Councilman Davis stated the reason he asked was because one of the comments from the Staff was there were no construction plans submitted and no drainage study shown. Councilman Davis stated these problems were not brought up at the Planning and Zoning meeting. Mr. Albin stated part of the problem was the owner's acknow- ledgement and dedication was not executed. Mr. Albin stated there was no fire protection shown and a couple of other items not complete. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, representing Barfield, appeared before the Council. ING PS 83- ,REQUEST OF W. BARFIELD FOR FINAL PLAT OF SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION 5TH FILING (LOCATED EAST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY EXISTING SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION AND ON THE SOUTH BY LACASITA MOBILE HOME PARK APPROVED 12. Mayor Faram advised the Council he had two people who wished to speak on this item and with the Council's permission he would depart from the rules and let them speak. Mr. Long stated the request tonight was approval of Sunny Meadows, 5th filin Long stated this had been previously submitted ov I in two pieces. Mr. Long stated they had received a ent letter stating that they would have to obtain p ssion to be able to discharge drainage water on adjacent owner's property so they came back in split the 4th filing into two pieces. Mr. Lon ated the 4th filing was the one that discharged the or amount of water to the property to the south, · Barnett's property. Mr. Long stated he thought an agreement had been worked out with Mr. Barnett for discharging BUDGETED ITEM: I. ACCOUNT NUMBER: ~ I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie DATE: f ( Jan. 5. 1984 SUBJECT: PS 83-128 Final Plat of Lot 18, Block 1, Meadow Ridge Estates DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located on the west side of Rufe Snow Drive, across the street from North Richland Junior High School. There are many things wrong with this plat. There wer e no construc t ion plans submitted. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedications is not signed. No drainage study wa s shown for this lot. No fire protection was shown. They al so need to show on the plat what surrounds the lot, such as streets, buildings, intersections, etc. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval and waived item #7 of the City Engineer's letter which stated the need for an extension of the existing 6 inch sewer linE but Mr. Br.onstad said Mr. Martin stubbed out £or this lot when he put in the utilities for his subd ivision to the west. The Staff recommends denial of this plat until all comments have been complied with and all corrections made. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of final plat. YES N/A NO x ~~ (}~ I I I" I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ';; ''\ Page 3 ( P & Z Minutes December 15, 1983 ( PS 83-126 APPROVED Bo e the motion to approve 3-126 and waive items 4 and 5 of the Engineer's letter of December 7th. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Tucker said the Commission would hear the next two requests together. 4. PS 83-127 Request of Martin Development Company for preliminary plat of Lot 18, Block 1, Meadow Ridge Estates (previously submitted as Lot I, John Vandusen Addition). 5. PS 83-128 Request of Martin Development Company for final plat of Lot 18, Block 1, Meadow Ridge Estates (previously submitted as Lot 1, John Vandusen Addition). Chairman Tucker said there was a question regarding item 17 of the Engineer's letter regarding a stub out for this lot. Mr. Martin came forward. Mr. Bronstad said Mr. Martin stubbed out for this lot when he was putting the utilities in on his subdivision to the west. Mr. Martin said that was correct. PS 83-127 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 83-127 with the exception of item #7 which they would waive. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. PS 83-128 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 83-128 and waive item 17 of the Engineer's letter. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 3-129 I I f I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ps ð'3-1:l? ( P S K -r3 - /;1. 3 ( JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS ENGINEERS · PLANNERS 3921 VANCE ROAD · FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 . 284-0981 December 12, 1983 Mrs. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Commission CTIY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-962, City of North Richland Hills MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES, Lot 18, Block 1 Prel. & Final Plat, PS 83-127/8, GRID 129 Dear Mrs. Calvert: We have reviewed your letter of December 8, and offer the following comments: 1 . No Objection. 2. No Objection. 3. No Objecti on. 4. No Objection. 5. No Objecti on. 6. The developer, Mr. David Martin, has agreed to pay the $400.00 prorata for the existing water line. 7. The sanitary sewer line was built just this past year. This line was furnished by Mr. David Martin, Developer of MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES for the expressed purpose of serving not only the proposed lot 18, but to provide sanitary sewer for the 3 existing residences to the north of lot 18. This would allow the residents to abandon their septic tanks, which would not function properly during the wet season of the year, thus overflowing sewage into Mr. Martin's development. Needless to say, this would make Lots 9, 10, & 11 B1k. 1 of MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES, unattractive to buyers as well as the possibility of a dangerous health hazard. The line inclu- ding the 4" sewer stubouts for connections was furnished at no cost to the existing residences by Mr. ~ðrtin. The extension of the sewer line would serve no further purpose as Lot 18 is at the top of the service area and the area south of lot 18 drains in the opposite direction. I I {' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I ( ( Page two Mrs. Wanda Calvert 12/13/83 8. No Objection. We trust this information is sufficient to complete your files. have any additional questions, please call. cc David f/iirtin Shoul d you I I f I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENCINE ERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 7, 1983 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-962, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEADOW RIDGE ESTATES, LOT 18, BLOCK 1, SUBMITTED AS (JOHN VANDUSEN ADDITION) PREL. & FINAL PLAT, PS 83-127/8, GRID 129 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would recommend that the name of this proposed subdivision be changed from the "John Vandusen Addition" to the "Meadow Ridge Addition" since this development is contiguous with Meadow Ridge. Also the lot and block number should be changed accordingly, (Lot 18, Block 1). 2. The existing zoning of this development should be noted on the plat, (IF-12). 3. The subdivision acreage should be noted on the plat. 4. The proposed 25-foot building setback line should be increased to 30-feet for IF-12 zoning. 5. In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer's Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan: I, , a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographical ;nformation used in this study is in compliance with said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper subsequent detailed construction planning. December 7, 1983 PS 83-127,8 PAGE 1 !SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I ( ,P.E. SEAL 6. We would suggest that the owner be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 8-inch water line on the east side of Rufe Snow. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for a total length of 100 feet for one-half of an equivalent 6-;nch line. Otherwise we would suggest that the owner be required to construct at least a 6-inch water line along the full frontage of this property on the west side of Rufe Snow from the existing a-inch pipe located at the south corner of this property, to the north property line of this lot, at which point a water valve and plug should be constructed. 7. An extension of the existing 6-inch sanitary sewer line along the full rear (west end) of this lot should be constructed from the existing cleanout located at the northwest corner of this lot to the southwest corner of the lot, at which point a manhole and stub-out pipe should be constructed to facilitate future extensions. 8. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please not hesitate to call. , RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician December 7, 1983 PS 83-127,8 PAGE 2 I~ I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I I ~ DATE: It! February 23, 1984 ~ SUBJECT: PZ 84-2 Zoning request from Agriculture & Industrial to R-3 (Single Family) on Tract 11, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, & Tract 2A, L.C. Walker Survey Abstract 1652 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Cardinal Lane. bounded on the west by Sunny Meadows Addition. and on the west east by Mangham Airport. There were 21 property owners contacted. but no one spoke in opposition. Charles Mangham sent a letter stating he was opposed to the zoning change. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDCETm ITDI: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x 2J'~~ (!~ I '/ If I , \\ " Ju. \ " , \ 1 \ iF.1? .J _ -:-~ .- "'-,. I , I ) , I I I , I f \ I . I I , , \ \ AG I \ F.P.} 1 I , J \ I AG 1 AG F-12 I .. \ I I I II I I I I I, I I I I I I I Ie I Page 6 ( P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 r Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He said he was here represent Stembridge Engineers wh did this plat. Mr. Hedgcoth said t ey will submit plans for the st et when they get approval by the C ission for the plat. Mr. Hannon sa could understand why Mr. Ste ridge waited to see if he got appro a1 of the plat; he did not want t spend the money if the Comm sion did not like the layout. is a replat, Chairman Tucker sai not a preliminary . Hedgcoth said they would be glad to list the lot area on the plat, but would like to know how the Commission feels about the layout. Mr. Hannon said the Subdivision Ordinance states a replat is to be handled as a final plat. Mr. Bowen said regarding item HI, the Commission feels they can not require them to plat property they do not own. The motion for denial of PS 84-12 carried 5-0. Request of U-Tex Development Company for replat of Lots 1R-1 & 1R-2, Block 6, Industrial Park Addition. PS 84-13 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 84-13. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-'0. 11. PZ 84-2 Request of John Cook to rezone Tract 11, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, and Tract lA, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652, from their present classifications of Agriculture and Industrial to a proposed classification of R-3 (Single Family). This property is located on the south side of Cardinal Lane, bounded on the west by Sunny Meadows Addition and on the east by Mangham Airport. , 'I· "- <. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I I Page 7 r- P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ( Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Cook came forward. He said he purchased this property which is adjacent to the Sunny Meadows property he is developing. Mr. Wood asked if it was R-3. Mr. Cook said it was. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Councilman Davis said they have a letter from Charles Mangham who is in opposition to this zoning request. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. PZ 84-2 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 84-2 as requested. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon. Mr. Bowen said he will vote for approval, but felt it needed to be stated that this property is very close to the airport. Chairman Tucker said that was correct. He said there is a cross runway which points to this property, and they will definitely be a nuisance. The motion to approve PZ 84-2 carried 5-0. 12. PZ 84-3 Request of Carl Powell to Tracts 10 & lOB, cComas Survey, Abstract , from their present fication of Agriculture-Specific Use to C-l (Commercial). This property is located at the southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Chapman Road. , í·, I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I J, ( ( MANGHAM AIRPORT 8650 Cardinal Lane Fort Worth, Texas 761 80 (817) 281....1~~ Certified - Return Receipt Requested ¡ January 13, 1984 City of North Richland Hills Planning and Zohing Board 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Gentlemen: I would like to register my opposition to the zoning change applied for by John CO~F- to rezone Tract 11, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, and Tract 2A, L. C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652, from their present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classific.. ation of :R-3 for single famity homes. My reason for opposing this change in zoning is because of its close proximity to the airport for obvious safety reasons which I have pointed out to you in the past. ;¡;¡~~ Charles H. Mangham cc: Allen Howeth Cantey, Hanger, Gooch, Munn & Collins Attomeys at Law I .,. ~~ I Ie I :1 I I I -I Ie I I I I I Ie I r ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 ;> Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-02 REVIEW LETTER, AGRICULTURE & INDUSTRIAL TO IF-8 OR R-3 (New Ordinance) REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 88 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PZ 84-02 PAGE 1 !5S0 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I /1 ORDINANCE NO. 'Q)~(J AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE 11080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-2 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture and 1-2 (Light Industrial) to R-3 (Single Family). SITUATED in Tarrant County, Texas and being a tract of land out of the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, and the L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod in the south R.O.W. line of Cardinal Lane, said point being also in the west line of said T.K. Martin Survey, and being 1,043.66 feet north of the southwest corner of said T.K. Martin Survey; THENCE along the west line of said T.K. Martin Survey, South 0 degrees 52 minutes 24 seconds West, 711.96 feet to an iron rod at a fence corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 24 minutes 58 seconds East, 126.58 feet to an iron rod in the Northeast corner of Pearl Street; THENCE South 01 degrees 39 minutes 32 seconds East, 50.36 feet to an iron rod in the Southeast corner of said Pearl Street; THENCE South 0 degrees 25 minutes 13 seconds West, at 154.76 feet passing the Southwest corner of said T.K. Martin Survey, said point being also the Northwest corner of the said L.C. Walker Survey, and continuing in all a distance of 442.97 feet to an iron rod at a fence corner; THENCE South 0 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds West, 1,031.23 feet to an iron rod for corner at a fence corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes 02 seconds East, 996.45 feet to an iron rod for corner at a fence corner; THENCE north 0 degrees 09 minutes 47 seconds East, 1,0410.33 feet to an iron rod for corner at a fence corner; THENCE South 86 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds East, 180.25 feet to an iron rod for corner in the West R.O.W. line of said Cardinal Lane; I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 THENCE along the Westerly and Northerly R.O.W. line of said Cardinal Lane the following courses and distances: North o degrees 52 minutes 31 seconds West, 669.16 feet; North 04 degrees 02 minutes 42 seconds West, 86.61 feet; North 18 degrees 59 minutes 47 seconds West, 58.81 feet; North 32 degrees 00 minutes 40 seconds West, 58.59 feet; North 44 degrees 41 minutes 11 seconds West, 78.27 feet; North 64 degrees 55 minutes 44 seconds West, 76.77 feet; North 81 degrees 14 minutes 25 seconds West, 98.86 feet to an iron rod for corner in the South R.O.W. line of said Cardinal Lane; THENCE along the South line of said Cardinal Lane, South 89 degrees 59 minutes 27 seconds West, 874.38 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 57.300 acres, more or less, or 2,495,988 square feet. This property is located on the south side of Cardinal Lane, bounded on the west by Sunny Meadows Addition, and on the east by Mangham Airport. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. ~ðeC ..~r- CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7)) A~,'l~[) 7:-~"ë @ L;?¡ ¿$'~ SECRETARY PL~ING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-2 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF February, 1984. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I, > I Ie 1 I I I 'I I Ie I I I I I I I -- ~ / .:;--/" DATE: February 23, 1984 SUBJECT: PZ 84-3 Zoning request from Agriculture-Specific Use to C-l (Counnercial) on Tracts 10 & lOB, J.C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zonin~ BACKGROUND: This property is located at the southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Chapman Road. There were 10 property owners contacted. but no one spoke in opposition to this request. The Plannin~ and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. IUDGETm ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: Nt A .0 X .z~ (?~" I , / ,. I, Ie I I AG I . , I , I I : . ( \ , -I. .~ Page 7 C P & Z Minutes· January 26, 1984 Ie I I I I I I 16 'I I PZ 84-2 APPROVED I I I I I fI I 12. PZ 84-3 { Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wish to speak in favor of this reque please come forward. Mr. Cook came forward. purchased this propert~ hich is adjacent to the Sunn~ eadows property he is developing. Mr. Wood R-3. Mr. Cook was. Tucker called for those to speak in opposition to this to please come forward. ouncilman Davis said they have 8 letter from Charles Mangham who is in, opposition to this zoning request. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 84-2 as requested. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon. Mr. Bowen said he will vote for approval, but felt it needed to be stated that this property is very close to the airport. Chairman Tucker said that was correct. He said there is a cross runway which points to this property, and they will definitely be a nuisance. The motion to approve PZ 84-2 carried 5-0. Request of Carl Powell to rezone Tracts 10 & lOB, J.C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from their present classification of Agriculture-Specific Use to C-l (Commercial). This property is located at the southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Chapman Road. / I· ~ · I ,e I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I t' I Page 8 ( P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ( Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Marsha Hill with Pre-School Enrichment came forward. She said this is a Learning Center mostly for 3 to 5 year aIds and they are requesting C-l zoning. Ms. Hill said this is a Learning Center which consists of Pre-school and Kindergarten. She said there are classes going on all day long. Ms. Hill said they work real close with the school teachers and they work on a 1-10 basis. She said they have all accredited teachers. Mr. Hannon asked if they have transportation for the kids. Ms. Hill said they did not furnish transportation. She said they now have after school enrichment, but no older than the second grade. Ms. Hill said the children are being brought to school. Ms. Hill said they plan to enlarge the present structure to 3,500 to 3,800 square feet. She said they teach Spanish and Remedial reading. MS. Hill said they would like for the Commission to come by and see what they are doing. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 84-3 APPROVED Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 84-3. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. I: I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I /" I r KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-0021 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONIN6 CASE PI 84-03 ~!Irw LETTER, AGRICULTURE-SPECIFIC ~S~-ÕAY ~ÃRË TO COMMERCIAL OR C-l (~ew 2rrlinance) REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEËT NO. 78 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PI 84-03 PAGE 1 / !5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METR0/267-3367 I, I Ie I I I I I I -P~-8Lj-3 NON£ MAN DR A N 9 w ~ ~ i en ODELL ST r SITE VICINITY MAP N.T.S. METES 6a BOUNDS Being a tract of land out of the J.C. McComas Survey, Abst. No. 1040, Tarrant County, Texas, and described by metes and bounds as follows: corner in the West line of Smithfield Road, West, from the Southeast corner of said I_BEGINNING at an iron pin for ..,being 27.0 feet South 89° 24' McComas Survey; I I THENCE South 89°24' West, for corner; a distance of 371.60 feet to an iron p1n THENCE North a distance of 188.36 feet to an iron pin for corner 1n the South line of Chapman Road (County Road #3060); THENCE North 89°24' East along the South line of Chapman Road, a distance of 371.60 feet to an iron pin for corner at the West line of said Smith- field Road; THENCE South along said West line of Smithfield Road a distance of 188.36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 1.607 acres; I I I I ft I I, " I"- # 1 Ie I·.. '. I' · ." .... . I I I #.,., )-., - I Ie I I I I I I t' I .\ ~.)J .: "'1 >.,\- '. · J-.: . ... ~. . ...., '.. ..~.. (..-' ,.:) \.)., .. .' \ .""... · r'i '" j " .' :. . ..,:, . . < '. 1-... . .' .... ....... . .. <J!!..... J2~:a ... oaR.- "'~> "'''' u :.1 m'" . .... > ~ã ... .... . :' .". --- . '. . . .' . ..~ .~:, '. '.. .. . . . .. .. . cPt.... or-~ r- .... · , > ... ...11:.- .~> ..."'... CD · 5 -v:u en'" · r; ~~ '" .... ,. ~ , -c o CD \............ . U) (]I) to o '" .Þ ~ uJ ~ .... en o I . Þ-4 ." ~ " .f!' .. .' . ,.,. . : .,. NORTH - 188.36' "'V o :0 .... .... o % o '"" ... :0 ~ ,., ... I- o .... · .. · .. · ) -- .. . ... · 7 ... .' .' , , .. ... . .' .... . . .'. .. ~.:. .;.: ...... : , .... z C» CD 6 f\J ~ ".., uJ '-J .... en o '. eo .. - .... 50UTH - 188.36' ~ .. ., . .. .. ....' .... , .... .., .. , ...., .... ...... .. .... ....... ,.. .... , .. , .. , .. SMITHFIELD ROAD c:...c.n nflt En no n:o I~ c.n UI c: XJ < fit -< -- . .' ~." Å'-;Þ ..' :...¡ .. .." : I '.. ......! \. - -:., . .. ,. ...·r .. .: ... ~ '.' .., r, '.J · f·· I ~ '.) ~. ,. ........ ..... .e. . ...., .' . .1' I..··· N.... ø· Zfft ",0 OOooJ .. n i~ ~ :0 n .... > r ( 60 ' R. 0 , W . ) en n ~ r- ".. "... n o i ~ -< ~n >~ 0> ~." .~ ~> ~z ",X) °0 .> 00 c o. 0.. . . . ÞOOI . -0 U) ~_~v .. J CA o I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ ORDINANCE NO. \ vi{\ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-3 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture-Specific Use to C-l (Commercial). BEING a tract of land out of the J. C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, Tarrant County, Texas and described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin for corner in the West line of Smithfield Road, being 27.0 feet South 89 degrees 24 minutes West, from the Southeast corner of said McComas Survey; THENCE South 89 degrees 24 minutes West, a distance of 371.60 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North a distance of 188.36 feet to an iron pin for corner in the South line of Chapman Road (County Road #3060); THENCE North 89 degrees 24 minutes East along the South line of Chapman Road, a distance of 371.60 feet to an iron pin for corner at the West line of said Smithfield Road; THENCE South along said West line of Smithfield Road a distance of 188.36 feet to the point of beginning and containing 1.607 acres. ' '''j'~>,~:,:;. . ;, ''; ~ . .... -' ..~~~'r".. t. ~...~: .~ I ~ Ie I Page 2 This property is located at the southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Chapman Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. . I I I I ·1 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ¿:£J~ C ~r CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Gf? L;J¡ ~ NING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-3 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF ,1984. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I e I I I I I I I ·Ie I I I I I I I f I I DATE: Februar'( 23, 19a1 L/ J' SUBJECT: PS 84-3 Short Form Plat of Lot 1, BI.ock 26, Fox Hollow Addition DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Chapman Road. Planning and Zoning This property is located at the southwest corner of Smithfield Road and This plat was denied by Planning and Zoning Commission Januarv 26. 1~84 be~ause there was not adequate fire protection and because there was conc~rn tÞat ~QqitiQnal right of way was needed to connect with the property to the west. All these problems have been resolved. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this plat on February 2nd subject to installing a fire hydrant and granting any easements needed for Chapman Road. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of Short Form Plat. BUDGETm ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x .4/~ (!~ ,/ / i:} ~ ~ ð ~-11 LR " >-i:=::"'~:= >-Pt1\t~ --ï "'T .:..... i~ ... ~ ~I ,~-, 10 :=:-~:._ ~ IIi ::! "'~TJ].~.~. ~t ~ ~ ~elJT1'fL'I 0 r:~" H>-~ >- -~- ~_f-':E3I= -~~'7 0;., o 0 CeeJÞ04:~~¡)~) I II,:"~>-:" '::: :íu........¡'r:67v I '::l'~ ' i ' ~' :.' I ~Ð~-I-:= _-·i',~ _O:'~_'..! lAù. (I;IY In, ~ -=, . ~...' MF ~' I ---_ 10- }o.ir¡:;_.... I#ln: .r---~ L...-.:~ ~_ _ ~. C - L..il&:. ..- ./ C . I ~ i. " '. L:':-;'Ç;: \- a. ,Af. !rcr-fl!> 'c h'! ~ CI AG r-- I 'i 1 r<' . sr.U5"I~ ::::~' !Þf':~" ~ ' ~..- -....-- r-I ~$Z-3Ø ~~;- 7'\ '" \ "''''\J I ......"'\ j ,..........~ >--~- 1-_ h AG .... _, '"'\ ~ \....:. f-( ~:¡;r.....~ ~ i- :=:~ :::::~, 1-- f- L. '-12 " , ~. .. . I ¡j\, /' 11 J:~.....tj 11 ""I.. - Co" r1§- ,--=~:=='" f- T .. A 4 ,t.... . i-. ---= ~~ I rlr- L....I)- E~t~ E;~ ~2 :=:: ~ A ..B.,J I f t..~. rIll r~' I lIi I"'t-- ~ - -~tY¡L....r--- ~ P. "i,~ ~I-I f- ~ 11='.. a t- ~ Co >-->--........ - - I- f-- · -i- i--- ~~] r~rs'.." r--~I~!:~___~~ -/1 I ... >- &.. .,, A,.. >-1../' T n~~ . =~~_._ '" ... ~ "teA" -:. ~r 'ii~ - v.~ j~ ' -= R T· "'~~J -15 >--0-- .....::"':'" ~ ~ {II \) AA ::Ii1IIm II::::; ~§.. ~ '- IÞ.J.'ri.~ __ ps g,-"r} :; l~ ~ - t:=t=1..-=~ , r TI \ 1J~tr'f6 ~ - 0':........ ~ ''J. ~- ~v fS 13 ~I I.. (·s, S.G ps = J JL ""=!J^ I !!,~,;91j 1 Inr: ....-,~::::- / r ()Pf;Ll.. APPt1 . '\ (9'-"1.0 ~, 2~ I I r.J.o It~" ~:rv.o r " I I "'{ ,-. 3D"~ .. I II L. 21 ". r ..I l5I1iIr[ 7M: I--=--Jr I I ! ~ I Y T ~ I !..LA...:.- ~ I ...... l!!,1IIJi ~ ~~~r~ ÇT HLÆ1' r -;: ~ ~~ ~-I I~ ::(:~II~ ~ II I. I -. - I .. r ~ "-III. .. AT ~ J /III UP';IJMt.. IUi~ ~~.~:r'__ ~,,~-..t9 C; ~ If{ AP.4..IJ"13 / 1\'1',1\:""'- AP. ~-Z$-ß~ r\~ r ~~J~3~.cÞwAØ \. _ ps 8J- z~(, ., NO" N · FOltTY ItOAn- /(' ~ L" 6.' "'- PS g~-11 (,CULP 4DOIJ. ... t-- ~r-- t-- ~ lap 'Dl~9/e~ ..~FI~ 1,.. IßZ~ 8.1 .. ...... ..... "- ...... II' iG -~ '1t':t~ ~ "2 T ,~ ¡ . I ~ . = "'C',-a~,~ ~~. """'10'~~ '" . - ~'/' ·,.e~·1f ~ 1 f PS S1!41 10 >-I~ - '- ~:~ :,:! . G,\. ii). ~r- II "n ....IIi I..JIt,S.4-· . >-1, ¡ L.t, e1~ . :., ., . ~~~ -, ~ ¡ , I ¡]I!- N. U/%7I'~~ I<~~...... _v. ""$,;~. r"'~~ .._ _~ //'.Á" ~F-9f¡ ,'..- r" ¡ Ii: · ( F' ...' -- L r n- ;;;"'~.... ~ I 1,-- R I I i I I I r ~ 1_ i ' PS '1- SS/i, --..-, .,,~_-' .l:'.. L'R -: ~.'~: I MQ '" IIII ¡ ~ ~ V~ MAIM (:I- 'r-9 - - ! r¿ 't:J~~~AÞ6" s-. ..·"r-:~" ~'~ .~- · I~·. ~ "../ _' f ': _........ ]~ / ÞP. r&l'1G'z- . . '. ,~k,S1;i;~:;, ,., , . ~ ~.. ...." ICMDOL 21=-9' r -, ~ ~ f P$ 83 -4-4- " ' ..,." -,_ ... fIlS .. _ ,.,.1", ID . ,,' hC (.f:D)( Hcu.Oc.t.J ~ØØN.., Ire..IU;:oIJ611 iA~'lþ~---1__+- ~"'IO/B.I IF-'2-= I " H;:: F,,,,A.t.. p~ 93 -J'LS If",ib-t, LlhUJla), ~~ -: ~1....trFrR >-- ...' 8 ~ Li..:.:.;,c 1I, tYJ '. 1 T 1 Fit' A... PLA1" ,...- ...... ~ ¡i:¡ '~ ~ r-- ~ _0....._ ~ t . r~<JT7 ~~D 1= >- r I '.lJl ~- ~t. /' II!! . " _} ...~~~~ ~ -'Ii " i:::= J I MT fS .~"J ~ ¡¡; -, 'c AG ~I~" ì·~7..:.~~~JoL'~,_........ 1-- m.. :- è-S'I'~n ~ ".. -iUM''''~: : 'It::- ~~'~~- .....J... AG-'- LR 'F-9; >, · ¡ 't-r J I I ~ 1f I i J I i/ lR l}~ ~I . . ~ TU, rs'N-/..J It - LR [,-e-I"I-....-- ~ IIJ I ~ " AG J-) rn-~::: e~ ~:A~' I . rT- .'- "' '?.IJ.#:.' þ. - . I ----- In' ~n ",..LR ItZ.I.'~i, ,1F-9 ~, ,_ . ~ ~,' MFA 'J . 1'511-55 ", _. . '" " \ 11:..'" f~ 92~~ ~ I n· on . F: ...... - . 1,8 ,~~ ~ \, --, CÞ!.te~f.:' IF-g "" 'tÞAl2-I2.U}.~¡ AG ,$ SJ- ~ ~ · Nlt.LS .....S.U. '. = .... B40-4 t AP- ØJ:2: "'.3 - ~øtlJJ'i . :: ~. Za. H-C., .. · .- ~ ,..... ~ ~, . . C . ¡ . .I t- r::s;:., ~.. p, ~ . - . ~. '.., ->0 \ ~ :::'. fÌ>øti. - - '" -",- -'.. - /1 \ - ' · r.' -.....r: - tf11f .'FItJ~· ~, , ~'!- I ( ~ ïII::: ::: ~'~/B.J F ~ Jr,,J.A-L ~.I - \ - , . \ fÞS S3-,tA --1 oJ I Tl PS la.' i .. 0: ; · 17m - , , C ReÞ~ ~":;'.. r' ?=~: J 1ì ríIT j):h~ ~ ~,. ~.~~i! 8".1'" '\ I I I 'I'· 5.\11. ~~Pi/IJ:.r1 ' 1 I I Ill!.. 1.11 .... :J::] I'S ,i· ''''-::;;' =---- M i '---'-~' \ . '.Q'I'n r I r r 40UIN ~c - L s.u. - ,,~ ~ 'J I II!=- T!iT1:.J] j I 11"'1' ,... I Ii r I I I ~~~JIIf. ..~ ~lZ \17.1 \JlJ I ~¿ ~i '~r1_~tiðltTt4 ItICMLAN ~r-"vï I . ~-.--.~ i' I !L~ --." I 'rï......~.I-ß1t= "' ~ ,,'....,-,. ~7.1=1 -=::IJI ..J.... ~ ~~ £ "HI I I I II J M- ~Iullf I \ , r, ~, ~_ ! 4: I ~ 11 I L I I ,"r g I I I I I II ¡ IIII 1"1- _I AP. 4-"-~~ ;' '." PS S~- 2.1,Zf. ~-'I' (i.~~~f'ø.J' ~ .~--=-.J _ AG '--=-~ ~ ~ ~ fg =I I- -II I -:- ~II Ii' .an I~ CI ~ - - - ~'IF I- ~ III I - I I. I I I I I I -I ler I I I I I I I ! i'~ I Page 3 P & Z Minutes ( February 2, 1984 ( ....- Mr. Long said they would try, but would rather they not make s a requirement. He said know they can not concentra ater; if the easements ar ot available, the Council n refuse to allow us to b Mr. Hannon said the Commission approved the preliminary plat and feel they should approve not hold them up on this plat. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 84-1. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 2. PS 84-3 DENIED 1/26/84 Reconsideration of the Short Form Plat of Lot I, Block 26, Fox Hollow Addition. Chairman Tucker called for the Engineer of this plat to come forward. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He said he understood the reason this plat was denied was the lack of fire protection. Mr. Stembridge said the owners have agreed to provide adequate fire protection. Chairman Tucker said there was also concern about the right of way for Chapman Road. He said the owners of the property to the west of this property had to agree to take off 20 feet of a reverse curve and the Commission felt to align Chapman Road might take some extra right of way off this property. Mr. Stembridge said the owner agrees to give additional right of way if it is needed. PS 84-3 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 84-3 subject to installing a fire hydrant and granting any easements needed for Chapman Road. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 5-0. ,...'\. . ,." '.~~' / /' ~~ ~:-. -. . '1 '.~ " or . - ' . I Ie I I I I Page 9 ( P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ( 13. PS 84-3 Request of Carl Powell for Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 26, Fox Hollow Addition. PS 84-3 DENIED Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 84-3. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash. I I Mr. Hannon said the plans are incomplete. He said the property to the west of this property has a reverse curve which they had to flatten out and this will probably affect this property. He said they will need to extend the slant through this property. 'I -- I I I I I I I {' I Mr. Hannon said this property is not covered by adequate fire protection and they will expect them to put in a fire hydrant. Mr. Hannon said they will also have to agree to participate in the development of Chapman Road. Doris Powell, owner of the property, came forward. She said 4 years ago, she spent $4,000 to install a fire hydrant. Mr. Bronstad said they must have a 300 foot radius and he does not think the entire property is covered. Mrs. Powell asked for clarification about Chapman Road. Mr. Hannon said they might have to dedicate more right of way to make Chapman Road correspond with the property to the west. Chairman Tucker said the Commission does not mind setting up a special meeting to re-hear the cases that are denied tonight. He said they do not want to hold up anyone. The motion to deny PS 84-3 carried 5-0. r _ 6.1") Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers January 23 , 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills , Texas 76118 Re : Lot 1, Block 26, Fox Hollow Addn. , Short Form Plat, PS 84-03 In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated January 10, 1984, we offer the following comments ; 1 . A 5-foot dedication has been shown on the plat for future widening of Chapman Drive. 2. All easements requested by the utility companies have been added to the plat. 3. It has not in the past been City policy to require show- ing the location of structures on plats which are to be recorded as Final Plats with the county. Since this is a short form plat and must meet the requirements of a Final Plat, we do not feel it appropriate to show existing structures . This lot is presently served by water and sewer and no new services are being proposed at this time. Again, the short form plat does not require showing the location of existing utilities . 4. No new utilities are being proposed for this lot. No utility plans are required for a short form plat. 5&6.This lot is already served by water and sewer services. 7. No additional water and sewer services are anticipated at this time. 8 . The owner would prefer to sign a letter covenant agreeing to participate in any furure improvements in Chapman Road. 9 . See item Number 8. 4028 Daley, Suite 103 • North Richland Hills,Texas 76118 • (817) 2841363 I · ~ ~ · I e Sincerely, I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I {' I ,. i ( , " ," I If there are any further questions regarding these lots, please do not hesitate to call. ~WR~ e ert -. ·St m r1 ge~Þ.E. DRS/bb cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I " " . ~ . ( ( KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas January 10. 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills. Texas 76118 RE: 3-832. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~~~ HOLLOW ADDN., LOT 1, BLOCK 26, SHORT FORM PLAT. PS 84-03. GRID 78 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would request that an additional 5 feet be dedicated on Chapman Drive to provide for the future widening of this street to a 41'-88 section. The total future right-of-w~ minimum width requirement for this section is 60 feet. 2. Utili~ companies should be contacted to determine if any easements are required to serve this lot. 3. The subdivision ordinance requires that all existing permanent structures be shown on the plat. Also, if this lot is presently served by water and sewer then we would request that the location of these services be shown or noted. 4. Although water and sewer plans have not been submitted to our office for review, it appears that adequate fire hydrant coverage has not been provided for this lot based on the 300-foot radius requirement for Commercial Zoning. 5. The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing 8-inch water line in Chapman Drive. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of the existing line for a total length of 371.6 feet, if tap fees have not alreaqy been paid. 6. The owner should be required to p~ his prorata share of an existing 6-inch sewer line in Smithfield Road. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for one-half of the existing line for a total length of 188.36 feet, if tap fees have not alreaqy been paid. January 10, 1984 PS 84-03 PAGE 1 SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 .817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I {' 7. If additional water and sewer services are required for this lot then open cuts will not be permitted across Chapman or Smithfield Road unless approved by the Public Works Department. 8. The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street improvements on Chapman Road or construct any required paving improvements along the frontage of his property at this time. We would estimate prorata at $53.85 for one-half of a future 40-foot collector street for a total length of 371.6 feet. 9. If the developer agrees to provide curb and gutter and paving improvements on one-half of Chapman Road along the frontage of this development in lieu of escrowing the funds for future street improvements, then we would request that construction plans be submitted to our office for review. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 10, 1984 PS 84-03 PAGE 2 .' r I I I i I \ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I (~ Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer TESCO Region Engr. Mgr. P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-3 Fox Hollow Addition, Block 26, Lot 1 Address or Location: Southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Chapman Road Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than January 11, 1984. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. x Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: 5' FOOT EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES, AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED SKETCH. TESCO: /1..- .... l- ~ - S? ~ [~. Q ~cvL) ?E DATE SIGNATURE CITY: ..¿J~ e~ DATE: December 20, 1983 SIGNATURE I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I DATE: February 23, 1984 IS:- SUBJECT: PZ 84-4 Zoning request from Agriculture to R-2 (Single Family) on a portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311. DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Douglas Lane. bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition and on the south by \Jlindcr.est Addition It There were 6 property owners contacted, but no one spoke in opposition to this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO X ~~o~ I ¡I f , t: '~~"~:'f¡ II i- '<1- ~I I .J pa e.-"s. ... (, a ...c.+ ÂðÞ."" t F·C:¡.. .4ÞCD 2.F-4 aJ.R.. AG' I I _ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I_ I . Page 10 P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 14. PZ 84-4 Request of Lucian Smith to rezone a portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of R-2 (Single Family). This property is located on the south side of Douglas Lane, bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition and on the south by Wind crest Addition. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Owen D. Long, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Smith. He said it was residential to the south, east, and north and duplexes to the west. Mr. Hannon asked if they plan to ever subdivide the other property of Mr. Smith's. Mr. Long said that at this time Marvin and his Dad live on the property and do not plan to subdivide it. Marvin Smith, 7609 Douglas Lane, came forward. He said someday they might do something with the land, but he has been there 36 years. He said the reason for platting this area is he had rather look at the front of homes instead of the rear as it is now. He said these will be expensive homes and this will back up to the same type of zoning. Mr. Wood asked about the duplex lots. Mr. Smith said in the next request, he ~s just asking for duplex zoning on one lot which joins the present duplex zoning. Mr. Wood asked how many duplex lots there were already there. 1- . . Page 11 P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 I Ie I I I Mr. Smith showed the Commission where the duplex lots were and where the single family lots were. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one Wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 84-4 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 84-4. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. I I I 15. PZ 84-5 Request of Lucian Smith to rezone a portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its pr classification of Agriculture t a proposed classification of R- -D (Duplex). This property i located on the south side of Dougl Lane, bounded on the west b aroaks Addition and on th south by Windcrest Addition. er opened the Public called for those wishing favor of this request to forward. I~ I I I Chairman Hearing to spe pIe e I I I I Ie I arvin Smith came forward. He said he had pretty well explained their request in the previous case. Mr. Smith said they are requesting duplex zoning for one lot which joins the present duplex lots. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 84-5 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 84-5. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. Ip I Ie I I I I II I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 / Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-04 REVIEW LETTER, AGRICULTURE TO IF-9-1600 OR R-2 (New Ordinance) REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 50 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PZ 84 -04 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I~ I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 1& ORDINANCE NO. \ C;qij AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII. AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS, PASSED. APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-4 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to R-2 (Single Family). BEING a tract of land out of the John Condra Survey in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin situated at the Northeast corner of Lot 8. Block 4, Maroaks Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 0 degrees 32 minutes West 50.0 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 52 minutes 17 seconds West 50.0 feet to an iron pin for corner in the Easterly R.O.W. line of Cimarron Drive; THENCE North o degrees 32 minutes West 607.67 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 39 minutes 13 seconds East 112.01 feet; THENCE South o degrees 32 minutes East 597.37 feet; THENCE Easterly along curve to the right with a radius of 1376.8 feet a distance of 59.96 feet to the P. T. of said curve; THENCE South 85 degrees 57 minutes 29 seconds East 10.0 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left with a radius of 1326.8 feet; THENCE Easterly along said curve to the left a distance of 98.12 feet to the P. T. of said curve; THENCE North 89 degrees 52 minutes 17 seconds East 335.76 feet; THENCE South 00 degrees 40 minutes 35 seconds East 162.0 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 52 minutes 17 seconds West 475.7 feet; I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I 1 I I I I I I- I Page 2 THENCE North 0 degree 32 minutes West 118.13 feet; THENCE Westerly along curve to the left with a radius of 1326.8 feet a distance of 70.52 feet to the P. T. of said curve; THENCE South 89 degrees 52 minutes 17 seconds West 19.82 feet to the place of beginning and containing 3.43 acres of land, more or less. This property is located on the south side of Douglas Lane, bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition and on the south by Windcrest Addition. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. ~s;e C. ~ß.r CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7?J ~ c'-¡-'? (;;7 a:-~ SECRETARY ~~I;;~ ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-4 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1984. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I- I Ie I I I I- I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I DATE: February 23, 1984 /1 SUBJECT: PZ 84-5 Zoning request from Agricult_ure to R-5-D (Duplex) on a portion of Tract 29 John Condra Survey, Abstract 311 DEPARTMENT: Plannin~ and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Dou~las Lane9 bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition and on the south by Windcrest~Addition. This is only for one duplex lot. There were 6 proEerty owners contacted. but no one spoke in opposition to this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. CITY COUNCIL ACTION IlEQUIR.ED: ADDroval or denial of zonin2 reauest. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x ~~g~ I' I' . ! . -ie I I I I ) ..., A~ p& eJ·I,t, .. C,i -c+ A6. Tb I F-C¡. '~c:Þ %.F-4 JJ." . I IIi ~ :, I : , I· I : I I I I I ': I I : ~__~ I I : : , __J:!.~)._-~ ¡ : J ~--:"f-- : : ' l. __J.- - r'- \ '. I - .f~ftÚ'w.,- - -l " " ~ : I : \ \'" \ ---~-i : r----....,,'~--.. I 'I , \ __ -: : r-------\ 1------ , I L_ ---- __.~ : I -__L_ - - ï ~L.._ ______... I I ¡------)1- ---.----{ L--r--~ ~----~___.... :. '~ AG AG AG ''; . ¡ - ,~..;.. .: . '. . ',~ '. : ,.": '~'- .,.:.··.004·_~~~ Aû : .~, - ~~_..~-~. .. ~ . II ~ . . . .., .: . AG I' I Ie I I I 1 I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I Page 11 P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ( Mr. Smith showed the the duplex lots were single family lots Chairman er called for those wis to speak in opposition to this equest to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 84-4. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 15. PZ 84-5 Request of Lucian Smith to rezone a portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of R-5-D (Duplex). This property is located on the south side of Douglas Lane, bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition and on the south by Windcrest Addition. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Marvin Smith came forward. He said he had pretty well explained their request in the previous case. Mr. Smith said they are requesting duplex zoning for one lot which joins the present duplex lots. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 84-5 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 84-5. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I - ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-05 REVIEW LETTER, AGRICULTURE TO 2F-9 OR R-5-D (New Ordinance! REF. UTILITY SYSTEM ~ID SHEET NO. 50 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PZ 84-05 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 ~ I- ~. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-05 REVIEW LETTER, AGRICULTURE TO 2F-9 OR R-5-D (New Ordinance) REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 50 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PAGE 1 PZ 84-05 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 It I ~ I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I /~ /" ORDINANCE NO. \ Glt } AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE 11080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-5 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to R-5-D (Duplex). BEING a tract of land out of the John Condra Survey in the City of North Rich1and Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of Lot 8, Maroaks Addition to the City of North Rich1and Hills, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 0 degrees -32 minutes West 120.0 feet; THENCE North 89 degrees 52 minutes 17 seconds East 19.82 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right with a radius of 1326.8 feet; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the right 70.52 feet; THENCE South 0 degrees 32 minutes East 118.13 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 52 minutes 17 seconds West 90.3 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.25 acres of land, more or less. / I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I II I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located on the south side of Douglas Lane, bounded on the west by Maroaks Addition and on the south by Windcrest Addition. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-S IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF .1984. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE. CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS / I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I lê~ DATE: February 23, 1984 ¡ SUBJECT: PZ 84-7 Zoning request from Agriculture to C-1 (Commercial) on Tracts 1B & 3B. J.M. Crockett Survey, Abstract 273. DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This propertv is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard and bounded on the west bv Smithfield E1ementarv school. There were 24 propertv owners contacted. but no one obiected to the reQuest. One property owner asked if thev wòuld be reauired to put up a fence between this property and the residences and school. After beinQ. told "ves". he said he would not obi ect to the zoning. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: x YES N/A NO .21~ {?~ /' I I. I I IF I 1 SU ,[ I Ie I I I I I I I. I I I I I Page 13 P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ( , I 17. PZ 84-7 Request of Bill Flories to rezone Tracts IB & 3B, J.M Crockett Survey, Abstract 273, from their present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of C-l (Commercial). This property is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard and bounded on the west by Smithfield Elementary school. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Dick Perkins with Teague NaIl & Perkins came forward to represent Mr. Flories. He said they plan a retail shop complex consisting of a grocery, drug, hardware store, and some small shops. Mr. Perkins said some of this property was zoned on the old map as "c" when it was in the old town of Smithfield. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Billy Walker, 8024 Mickey Street, came forward. He asked if this request is passed, would they be required to put up a fence between it and the residences and the school. Chairman Tucker said there is a requirement that they must put up a screening fence between it and the residences and the school. Mr. Bowen said it had to be a 6 foot. Mr. Walker said he would not object. I I I_ I Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. PZ 84-7 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 84-7. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 5-0. I I Ie I I I I I I I_ ii I I I I I I Ie ~ r- KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PI 84-07 REVIEW LETTER, AGRICULTURE TO COMMERCIAL OR C-1 (New Ordinance) REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 78 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. " RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PZ 84-07 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 ~ I- I I- I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I- I / /1 ð"'\V ORDINANCE NO. I (ì q ({ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NpTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-7 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to C-l (Commercial). Boundary description for a tract of land out of the John M. Crockett Survey. Abstract 273. within the City of North Richland Hills. Tarrant County. Texas. being that certain 1.1386 acre tract of land as conveyed to H. T. Worthington by deed recorded in Volume 3048. Page 352. of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas. and being a portion of that certain 15.01 acre tract of land as conveyed to H. T. Worthington by deed recorded in Volume 1935. Page 91. of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas and being m~re particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the west line of FM 11938 (Davis Boulevard). said point being the northeast corner of said Worthington tract (Tract 3B). and said point also being the southeast corner of Lot 18. Block 3. W. E. Odell Addition. an addition to the original town of Smithfield; THENCE South 18 degrees 27 minutes West along the east line of said Worthington tract and the west line of said FM 11938 for a distance of 45.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 2924.79 feet; THENCE continuing in a southerly direction along said curve to the left and the said west R.O.W. line of FM 1938 and the east line of said Worthington tract. a distance of 708.10 feet to the end of said curve to the left; THENCE West 10.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 210.84 feet to a point for corner; THENCE West 130.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 75.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE West 164.45 feet to a point for corner; I I I- I I I I 'I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 THENCE West 164.45 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 200.56 feet to a point for corner; THENCE West 184.72 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 573.89 feet to a point for corner; THENCE East 152.31 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 03 degrees 12 minutes East for a distance of 821.98 feet to a point for corner, said point being in the south line of said W. E. Odell Addition; THENCE East along the said south line of W. E. Odell Addition for a distance of 277.00 feet to a point, said point being in the west line of Mickey Court; THENCE South 178.00 feet to a point, said point being the southwest corner of said Mickey Court; THENCE East for a distance of 160.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 10.9986 acres of land, more or less. This property is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard and bounded on the west by Smithfield Elementary school. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND Z~NING OMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF January, 1984. C. Cn ~ ~er ~ ,'~,...... ~I~L~I~ AND ZONING COMMISSION t/?7 d4;1 2, ~/i/; L'; ~. ¡;/( ~ SECRETARY PL~ING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-7 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF ,1984 . MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I" I I DATE: February 23t 1984 SUBJECT: PZ 84-8 Zoning request from 1F-7 to.R-4-SD (SeDarate Ownership Duplex) on Tracts 2B5. 2Cl. 2C2. 2C3. & 2C4. M. Lynch Survey. Abstract 953. DEPARTMENT: P1annin2 and Zonin2 BACKGROUND: This Droperty is located on the south side of G1enview Drive and annroximately 120 feet west of Jackie Lee Street. There were 22 DroDertv owners contacted. but no one spoke in opposition. The P1annin2 and Zonin2 Commission recommended annrova1 of this zonini reqµest by a vote of 3-2 with Mr. Bowen and Mr. Hannon votin2 a2ainst. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x 0<Í~ (J~ I' Page 14 ( P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 Ie I I I I I I I I. I I 18. PZ 84-8 I I I I I f I PZ 84-8 APPROVED 19. PS 84-7 PS 84-7 APPROVED ( Request of Emory Bellard to rezone Tracts 2B5, 2Cl, 2C2, 2C3, & 2C4, M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from their present classification of IF-7 to a proposed classification of R-4-SD (Separate Ownership Duplexes). This property is located on the south side of Glenview Drive and approximately 120 feet west of Jackie Lee Street. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Bellard came forward. He said they plan low density garden type homes. Mr. Bellard said this is a transitional area and feel this would be a good buffer to the Multi-Family. Mr. Hannon asked if Mr. Bellard requested a zoning change for garden homes or for duplexes. Mr. Bellard said he applied for the separate ownership duplexes. He said some people call them garden homes. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 84-8. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 3-2 with Bowen and Hannon voting against. Request of Emory Bellard fo preliminary plat of view Park Addition. · Hannon made the motion to approve This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen asked if all the lots were the correct size. I" Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-08 REVIEW lETTER, IF-7 TO R-4-SD (New Ordinance) REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 147 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ( RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PZ 84-08 1 PAGE S!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 .817/283-8211 . METRO/287-3387 I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I e I I #/ ORDINANCE NO. (D t() AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE 11080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-8 the following described property shall be rezoned from IF-7 to R-4-SD (Separate Ownership Duplexes). BEING a tract of land out of the M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, Tarrant County, Texas and being a part of the 110 acre tract of land described in Deed recorded in Volume 29, Page 441 Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod being a deed call of 844.0 feet West of the Northeast corner of said 110 acre tract and being in the south R.O.W. line of Glenview Drive; THENCE South 00 degrees 51 minutes East, 580.0 feet to an iron rod; THENCE South 89 degrees 22 minutes West, 540.0 feet to an iron rod for a corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 51 minutes West, 580.0 feet to an iron rod in the south R.O.W. line of Glenview Drive for a corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 22 minutes East, 540.0 feet along said Glenview Drive R.O.W. line to the point of beginning and containing 7.19 acres of land. I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I Page 2 This property is located on the south side of Glenview Drive and approximately 120 feet west of Jackie Lee Street. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF January, 1984. ¿£J~ C ~Y"' CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION <---Yh -- ~ r:;?J L--:r, ~ _ /J t7 ¿/ / ~'l O~-¿e Gí _ ¡P( ~ SECRETARY PL~ìNG AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ- IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF . MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I· I' , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I II I I DATE: February 23, 1984 SUBJECT: PZ 84-9 Zoning re9uest from Agriculture to C-2 (Commercial) on Tract l2C, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This ro erty is located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road. There were 8 owners contacted, but no one spoke in opposition. The Plannin and Zonin Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x JJ~ (]~ /' r:l ~ AG IF-8 ..e,lIT.....LÞ ..... .AG I~ I , I I I I I ,I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I -. Page 15 (' p & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 ( Tom Vogt with Vogt E forward to rent Mr. Bellard. He said were 3800 square feet and e smallest is 35 foot wide. Mr. Vogt said the ones on the cuI de sac have a 50 foot radius. The motion to approve PS 84-7 carried 5-0. 20. PZ 84-9 Request of Charles D. Rutledge to rezone Tract 12C, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of C-2 (Commercial). This property is located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Rutledge came forward. He said he was requesting this zoning change so he could have his business there. Mr.Rutledge said the area is all going commercial. Mr. Rutledge said there are two small houses on this property which is an eye sore and he plans to tear them down and build a nice office building. Mr. Wood asked why Mr. Rutledge requested C-2. Mr. Rutledge said he needed C-2 for outside storage. He said he has a vehicle and two trailers, but there would not be very much storage. Mr. Rutledge said he plans to build an approximately 3,700 square feet building. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ir, I {to I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I ~ I . Page 16 / P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 PZ 84-9 APPROVED 21. PS 84-5 PS 84-5 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT BACK TO ORDER - ( Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 84-9. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Charles D. Rutledge for Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 13 Meadowview Estates. Mr. Hannon made the motion PS 84-5. This motion was Ms. Nash. Mr. Bronstad said th already have water and sewer on he property, but if they need add tional coverage. they will be requir to pay pro rata. Mr. Bronst ä sail they will be require to sign a covenant or escrow money or both Davis Boulevard and Rumf eld Road. to approve PS 84-5 carried The meeting adjourned at 9:15 P. M. Chairman Tucker called the meeting back to order at 9:40 P. M. with the 'same members and staff present. MS. Nash made the motion to reconsider item #1, PS 83-125. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Tucker said the Commission, in denying this plat, was trying to protect the city and the public, but after discussing the matter and hearing both sides, the Commission has decided, since we do have a City Engineer and Staff to over see the needed changes, to reconsider so the plat may go on to the City Council. I· I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ft I ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1984 ~ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-09 REVIEW LETTER, AGRICULTURE TO COMMERCIAL OR C-1 (New Ordinance) REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 52 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ALBIN, P.E. ~, .' RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 8, 1984 PZ 84-09 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 .817/283-6211 . METR0/287-3367 I I II I I I I I I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I , ~~ fz R~-7 VICINITY MAP :.=:: p'P' METES & BOUNDS SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, and being a tract of land out of the S. Richardson Surv('y, Absl. No. 1266, Tarrant CUUllty, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes & bounds a~ follows: BEGINNING at a point in the exi::;ting North line of Rumfield Road (3D' R.O.W.) said point also being the Nurtheast corner of the intersection of Rumfield Road and Davis Blvd. (S.H. 1938); THENCE North 00° 25 East along UIl· Nonh line of said Davis Blvd. a distance of 10 feet to an iron l.>ill Sl't fur the proposed Norlh R.O.W. line of Rumfield Road, and ccntinuing (III 334.40 feel for a total distance of 344 · 40 fee t t 0 ani r on pin set for cor II e r ; THENCE North 88° 37 00 East a distance of 168.0 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE South 00°05 West a distance of 338.48 [cpt to an iron pin set for the proposed North R.O.W. line of HUlllil(dd Road, and continuing on 10 feet for a total distance of 348.48 feet to a point for corner; .¡HENCE West along the existing N?r~h H.O.W. line of Rumfield Road to the POINT OF BEGINNING and contaInIng 1.344 Acres of land; I ~ II I I I I I I I (' I I ,I I I I -- I , , :, J.P.S. . ........ QCX> >~ :..J>- CD~ ::I: U)~ - % >LtJ «~ Q~ ......- -. q: ~ I: rt) II) LLJI -101 N o o o ~'iitr.:r¡þ \r¿(¡\ CV·~ ~~. ~~. ~\~ ~"':J'ö ~,¡. "¡O\· ,/ I68D1 N88°37100IlE LOT 2, BLOCK 13 1.3qq AC. ZONED - COWWERCIAL -. .: ...:~I ...... : '. .. . . JI'. I. . . .. ........ . .. '. .. . . ". ~ ..... .... .. . . .,:. '.. . . ... ....::"... I. ..- . .: . ... . : . '... ; ... \ I.,.... . - . ..:: -.. . ..-- . .... . -. . .,' P.O.I. I.' .1. . -..i ~ ".' ". - , .. ., .' . '. ',.' '. . ..... .... " .\.. '.': ' ...~... .~' J ..' . · ...: ..: " . . - .... .. '.- <.- .':., .. '. . .:. '. ",.- . ,. "(' CD . cD -CO ~ ~ I Q)I~ ~I- It) o , 0 o o en WEST 170.0' -------.1. _-_ IO'STREET DEDICATION../ RUMFIELD ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 3050 ) EXIST. 30' R.Q W. ,- or 1 .. . S' . ---~~~ ." . .-. r ..¡..: . ".. ..... . .... .... : .' ".,' -' 1. \,~',,1;)1 \'/,CJ :i~~ ~. "f¡.~ ~. ~ 'ö\\\ ~I ~\. I.' . .. I' I I- I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I ~1 ý ORDINANCE NO. i {)C{ c,c AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-9 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to C-2 (Commercial). BEING a tract of land out of the S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the existing North line of Rumfield Road (30'R.O:W.) said point also being the Northeast corner of the intersection of Rumfield Road and Davis Boulevard (S.H. 1938); THENCE North 00 degrees 25 minutes East along the North line of said Davis Boulevard, a distance of 10 feet to an iron pin set for the proposed North R.O.W. line of Rumfield Road, and continuing on 334.40 feet for a total distance of 344.40 feet to an iron pin set for corner; THENCE North 88 degrees 37 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 168.0 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 05 minutes West a distance of 338.48 feet to an iron pin set for the proposed North R.O.W. line of Rumfield Road, and continuing on 10 feet for a total distance of 348.48 feet to a point for corner; THENCE West along the existing North R.O.W. line of Rumfield Road to the point of beginning and containing 1.344 acres of land. I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. /4,,-.- ~ ( - /.~ ,a...-. ,. . ~ ....-. ;.~ ...'..;. - w·~~....~,-;,.r~ '- , ~ ~;. CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION L--y-h -- '- (~2> C---::/ /,,~.. /J i//Þ I ¿:,";;"';':c .-: ;; · -<:.:: ',-- - l - ~.,.:.-.... ¡;¿~ SECRETARY PL~ING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-9 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1984 . MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I I, Ie I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I I DATE: February 23, 1984 ).~ SUBJECT: PS 84-5 Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 13. Meadowview Estates DEPARTMENT: Plannin~ and Zonin~ BACKGROUND: This property is located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumf ield Road. All Engineer's comments have been corrected and they agree to si2n a covenant for future street improvements. Mr. Bro~stad said no pro rata for water and sewer would be reQuired since thev alreadv have water and sewer unless they need additional coverage. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this Short Form Plat. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of plat. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A .2J~ (!~ NO x ,./ I I I Ie I I I ~ J'1S Bi-7ø PAaJL" 'EpJ AÞ..,. AG I.. '..n, &. , .c.ItT.....U;/ ..... AG AG J 1 Î . AG f tJ4L. rs R ...1 (, Þ.f. ,.-10--" rS &'-4 FLAI\t\IIJ60 \ 1i6T. ~\ (81).'" AlM-¡ \ ç, ~"&".4- I' I e I Page 16 P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 I I I 21. PS 84-5 PS 84-5 APPROVED I I I 14 I I ADJOURNMENT BACK TO ORDER I I I I I Ie I ( r. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 84-9. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Charles D. Rutledge for Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 13, Meadowview Estates. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 84-5. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash. Mr. Bronstad said they already have water and sewer on the property, but if they need additional coverage, they will be required to pay pro rata. Mr. Bronstad sail they will be required to sign a covenant or escrow money for both Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road. The motion to approve PS 84-5 carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:15 P. Chairman Tucker called eeting back to order at 9:40 with the same members and f present. e the motion to reconsider PS 83-125. This motion was se ded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Tucker said the Commission, in denying this plat, was trying to protect the city and the public, but after discussing the matter and hearing both sides, the Commission has decided, since we do have a City Engineer and Staff to over see the needed changes, to reconsider so the plat may go on to the City Council. I' I Ie I I I I I il Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I / ( Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers January 24, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lot 2, Block 13, Meadowview Estates Short Form Plat, PS 84-05 In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated January 10, 1984, we offer the following comments: 1. An additional 5 feet has been added to the original 10 feet dedicated on Rumfield Road. 2. All easements requested by the utility compan1es have been added to the plat. 3. It has not in the past been City policy to 'require show- ing the location of structures on plats. which are to be recorded as Final Plats. with the County. Since this is a short form plat and must meet the requirements of a Final Plat, we do not feel it appropriate to show existing structures. This lot is presently served by water and sewer and no new services are being proposed at this time. Again, the short form. plat does not require showing the location of existing utilities. 4. Although utility plans are not required to accompany short form platting, the owner assures the City that a fire hydrant does exist on Rumfield approximately in the center of his front property line. S. If any additional taps are required for this lot, the owner will pay his prorata share for an equivalent 8-inch line. 6. This property has sewer service existing. 7. We agree with this requirement. 8. In lieu' of escrowing the money for future street improvements, the owner prefers to sign a letter covenant agreeing to pay his prorata share at the time the improvements are made. 9. See item Number 8. 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North R ichland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 I' / I í/ ~ If there are any further questions regarding these lots, please do I'" not hesitate to call. Sincerely, I I I 1 I I Ie I I I I I I I 1_ , I ( 10. ( Highway permits will be obtained pr10r to any construction within Davis Blvd. right-of-way. ,/ G'\ 0 1\ 1I Q "t:""" t _". 9.,A. ~.'~'lf, P,E, DRS/bb cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician I I e I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 10, 1984 /7 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-850, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEADOWVIEW ESTATES, LOT 2, BLOCK 13, SHORT FORM PLAT, PS 84-05, GRID 52 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would request that an additional 5 feet be dedicated on Rumfield Drive to provide for the future widening of this street to a 411-88 section. The total future right-of-way minimum width requirement for this section is 60 feet. 2. Utility companies should be contacted to determine if any easements are required to serve this lot. 3. The subdivision ordinance requires that all existing permanent structures be shown on the plat. Also, if this lot is presently served by water and sewer then we would request that the location of these services be shown or noted. 4. Although water and sewer plans have not been submitted to our office for review, it appears that adequate fire hydrant coverage has not been provided for this lot based on the 300-foot radius requirement for Commercial Zoning. 5. The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing 16-inch water line in Davis Blvd. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of and equivalent a-inch line for a total length of 344.4 feet, if tap fees have not already been paid. 6. The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing 10-inch sewer line in Rumfield Road. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of and equivalent a-inch line for a total length of 170.0 feet, if tap fees have not already been January 10, 1984 PS 84-05 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I paid. 7. If additional water and sewer services are required for this lot then open cuts will not be permitted across Rumfield Road unless approved by the Public Works Department. 8. The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street improvements on Rumfield Road or construct any required paving improvements along the frontage of his property at this time. We would estimate prorata at $53.85 for one-half of a future 40-foot collector street for a total length of 170.0 feet. 9. If the developer agrees to provide curb and gutter and paving improvements on one-half of Rumfield Road along the frontage of this development in lieu of escrowing the funds for future street improvements, then we would request that construction plans be submitted to our office for review. 10. Written permission should be obtained from the State Highway Department for any proposed construction within the Davis Blvd. right-of-way along the frontage of this development. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 10, 1984 PS 84-05 PAGE 2 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I / ~ Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer TESCO Region Engr. Mgr. P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-5 Meadowview Estates Addition, Block 13, Lot 2 Address or Location: Northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than January 11, 1984. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. ;r Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: r-- ,,":> rOOT EASEr\~ENT FOR ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION FACiliTIES, AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED SKETCH. TESCO: DATE/2- 2),- r3 SIGNATURE ~~. Q ~~ j)F SIGNATURE JJ ~ c~ CITY: DATE: December 20, 1983 I I Ie I I I "I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I DATE: February 23, 1984 SUBJECT: PZ 84-10 Zoning ReQuest from C-1 (Commercia') ~n C-l-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages on Lot 19 Block 109 Snow Hei2hts North Addition. DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Meadow Crest Drive. There were 3 property owners contacted. but no one spoke in oDDosition. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zonin2 reauest. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x ~~o~ l I I _ I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I_ I I « (' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS JANUARY 26. 1984 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, George Tucker. at 7:40 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members Alt. Member George Tucker Marjorie Nash Don Bowen Mark Hannon Mark Wood John Schwinger Councilman Asst. Dir. PW/U P & Z Coordinator Richard Davis Allen Bronstad Wanda Calvert State Representative Charles Evans CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 15, 1983 Mr. Wood made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Hannon abstained since he was not present. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 27, 1983 Mr. Wood made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Mrs. Calvert stated that State Representative Evans requested the case he is representing, agenda item 122. be moved to the first on the agenda since he has another appointment. Mr. Wood made the motion to move item 122 to the front of the agenda. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. 22. PZ 84-10 Request of Mid City Pizza Corporation to rezone Lot 1, Block 10, Snow Heights 'North Addition, from its present classification of C-1 to a proposed classification of C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Meadow Crest Drive. I I Ie Page 2 P & Z Minutes January 26, 1984 I I I I I I I, I I I I I I I Ie I PZ 84-10 APPROVED .. ......-....-...---....- 1. PS 83-125 Denied 12/15/83 PS 83-125 D~IED 2. PS 84-1 ( Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. State Representative Charles Evans came forward to represent Mid City Pizza. He said this property is already zoned C-l and the restaurant is already open. Mr. Evans said they need an approval for liqour license which would be in the name of Dan Cole. Mr. Wood asked how many other Specific Uses were there along Rufe Snow. Mr. Evans said there were probably three. He said their main business would be the sale of pizza. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 84-10. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Wayne Steward for reconsideration of the final plat 0 Blocks 13 thru 25, Fox Hollow Addition. motion to deny this plat wit t prejudice since the plans ha not been reviewed by the Cit gineer. This motion was conded by Ms. Nash and the motion to deny carried 5-0. Request of B & M Development Company for final plat of Kingswood Estates Addition. Section 3. Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 84-1 because the plans are incomplete. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash. 'I I Ie I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I /...... I r K NOWL TON-E NG II SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 23, 1984 Planning and Zoning Co~mission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-10 REVIEW LETTER, C-1 TO C-1-SPEC. USE-ALCOHOL REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 112 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician January 23, 1984 PZ 84-10 PAGE 1 SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211. METRO/287-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I P I Vþ.- q f--(7) . o . .. . .. ----- 300.Q-1-- ---------------- - ---N 8ge42'1lfuW------¡ 150.0' : I I " L.OT 1 .-- ----- I I I I I . :; I 0. 0-- ~ 0 U) · N,O . In 0.-. o :. Zl I I I I -t I I I . LtJ ---. > ~ M · ~ ~ o & =- - o ~ z ~ In ~ W LL ~ C en ~. --- I I ]I õÕ 0·"& _ 0 . U)1ft N'" · . g o o BLOCCK .10 .. .. P.O.8. S 89·~2'1q" E .. MEADOW CREST DRIVE (10' R.O.W.) SKETCH SHOWING LOT It BLqCK 10 SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH Metes .:& Bounds SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills) Tarrant CountYt Texas, and being all of Lot 1, Block la, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH, as recorded in Vol. 388-156, Pages 2 & 3, P.R.T.C.T.) and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point at the intersection of the north line of Meadow Crest Drive (601 R.O.W.) and the east line of Rufe Snow Drive; THENCE South 89° 42114" East along the north R.O.W. line of Mead9w Crest Drive, a distance of 150.0 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 00°26100" East along the East property line of the herein described Lot 1, Block 10 Snow Heights North, a distance of 150.0 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 10; THENCE North 89°42114" West along the north property line of said Lot 1, Block 10, a distance of 150.0 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot) and being in the east R.O.W. of Rufe Snow Drive; THENCE South 00°26'00" West along tl~e' east R.O.W. of Rufe Snow Drive, a distance of 150.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.517 acres of land. ~ \ \ ac. a W aL ¡ LEWIS 011. , VI CI NITY MAP N. T. s. I II I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 'I I ORDINANCE NO. I f)q 1 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ84-10 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages in the name of Dan C. Cole and be non-transferable. BEING Lot 1, Block 10, Snow Heights North Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-156, Pages 2 & 3, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This propery is located at at the Northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Meadow Crest Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY, 1983. ~'~.J!. C ç:£", ~~,-., /~ .... I . L-~~;>--) ,. .- , '_ (:C,~i~~;:.., ~:n~g & Zoning Commission /./ /, 7 ,. " r . . . .' -, ,-.,) './ (' ~- ~ -" l/ t/ ¿' . / /" -' ~ . to~.:.. -/ ¿ ~.. ~ Secretary, Pl~bning & Zoning Commission BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERY IN CASE NO.PZ-84-10 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1984. Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Rex McEntire, City Attorney I DATE: 2-23-84 ImBJECT : ·e I DEPARTMENT: Public .Works ~A~K~ROUND: This is a plat that you approved at your last meeting and the comments that are requested to be waived concern the discharge of drain water Request for Waiver of 'Engineer's Comments Concerning Kingswood Estates Phase III I . ontp property abutting Kingswood Estates III. The engi~eer's letter stat~d that the developer must obtain letters of pe~~ission from the owners of these properties' before construction can begin'.. .. 'I If a waiver" is granted, the developer of Kingswood Est~tes should submit a hold harmless letter to the city that the city would not"be I liable for any loss of materials or workmansh~p in this subdivision I and that they could only put the water and sewer lines in th~ ground and then stop if. they do not obtai~ these letters by that time. Ie I , I 'I I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: , Kingswood Estates Phase III. Approve/disapprove waiver of this comment pertaining to I BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO I :::::::_::::::~~--~---------------------~--------------------------- I I Ie -I I il Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I CHARLES W. EVANS ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O.Box8 Hurst. Texas 78053 (817) 282·9811 February 21, 1984 City Secretary City of North Richland Hills City Hall North Richland Hills, TX 76117 Dear Jeannette: I wish to be placed on the agenda for the City Council meeting on February 27, 1984, to discuss the possibility of obtaining waivers to the engineers' comments from the property owners around Kingswood Estates, Phase 3. Your courtesies in this matter will be greatly appreciated. CE/mfk I DATE: February 27,1984 I SUBJECT: Ie DEPARTMENT: II BACKGROUND: Presentation by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co of the 1982-83 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. This report, upon acceptance by the II City Council, will then be presented to the Municipal Finance Officers II Association for consideration for the Certificate of Conformance. This report was prepared with this goal in mind. II II 1982-83 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (Audit) Finance I I, I I I I I I I I- I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Acceptance BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO N/A ~~~ I ~ I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I re I DATE: ef¿' February 27, 1984 SUBJECT: 1984 Capital Improvement Program DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The ClP Committee met on November 3, 1983 and February 9, 1984. Attached are the minutes from those meetings, and a report on the status of various ongoing projects. The Council is requested to set priorities for the 1984 Capital Improvement Program. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Establish the 1984 Capital Improvement construction program BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: I I 'e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE CIP MEETING FEBRUARY 9, 1984 Present: Jim Ramsey Richard Davis Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Gene Riddle Richard Albin Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Ci ty Manager Assistant City Manager Public Works Director City Engineer Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked the Staff if they were satisfied with the construction job on Rufe Snow, specifically two areas: one was the asphalt approach to the railroad crossing and the other was an apparent cosmetic problem slightly to the north of the railroad. The problem with the railroad track is that the engineering specifications required that the road be built to the same grade as the existing railroad track. This was done by the contractor, however, the railroad changed the grade of the track. Gene Riddle and Rodger Line will work with the railroad to attempt to resolve the problem. Richard Albin confirmed to the committee that the North Hills Street project was apparently finished with inferior asphalt, which will hasten its deterioration. Documentation has started with the contractor for restitution. It is necessary to call their bond, we are faced with probably several years of litigation. Richard Albin was asked the status of the storm drainage master plan. He stated that it was approximately 30% complete and the contract with KEF requires that the plan be finished six months after the Corp of Engineers have finished their study. Rodger Line will contact l\1ilburn Smith, with the Corp of Engineers, to check on the status. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked the Staff to consider signalization of Smithfield Road and Davis Blvd. The discussion that followed centered around the possibility of constructing Watauga Road and signalizing that intersection. The southbound lane currently under construction on Davis Blvd. will ease the problem somewhat. Rodger Line briefed the committee on the need to acquire right-of-way and easements on Flory Street. Richard Albin will have all the details on Flory and the Calloway Acres projects for presentation to the Council on February 27th, 1984. It was decided that Center Street be dropped from the CIP and the details pertaining to the construction of Mickey will be presented at the Council Meeting of February 27th. Richard Albin was given authorization to proceed with design and engineering with the unpaved portion of Lola, including necessary drainage. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CIP Meeting 2/9/84 Page Two Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey and Richard Davis will recommend priorities for the final 13 streets identified under previous bond programs. They will also recommend which of those 13 streets should be deleted from the CIP. This priority listing will be available February 13th and presented to the full Council on February 27th. Richard Albin will prepare pre-design estimate on correcting the serious street and drainage problem at Lynn Terrace. This will be completed by the meeting on February 27th. By the 27th of February the Staff will prepare comments on the advisability of proceeding with either Glenview, Harwood or Watauga Road. The pros and cons of each project was discussed. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS STREET AND DRAINAGE TAX SUPPORTED PROJECTS FEBRUARY 9, 1984 Completed Projects Projects in Progress Projects to be Initiated - Under Design Other Street and Drainage Projects Unspecified Street and Drainage Other Building Projects $ 3,090,161 3,802,573 974,180 1,152,459 1,826,833 1,155,286 TOTAL $12,001,492 SOURCE OF FUNDS 1980-1982-l983 Bond Sales Transfer to CIP in June, 1983 Transfer to CIP in August, 1983 Interest Construction Fund Transfer/Pre-1980 CIP Miscellaneous Income Assessment Income TOTAL $ 7,000,000 1,000,000 1,842,000 1,082,750 705,933 229,581 141,228 $12,001,492 I I Ie I I I I I I Ife I I I I I I I I'e I I. COMPLETED PROJECTS Projects completed as of October 31, 1983 Additional Completed Projects October 31st North Hills Holiday North Davis Blvd. (Northbound Lane) TOTAL PROJECTS COMPLETED $2,270,355 to Present: Actual Transfer to Budget Cost Unspecified $ 619,575 $512,453 $107,122 324,833 268,979 55,854 72,000 38,374 33,626 $1,016,408 $819,806 $196,602 $3,090,161 I I Ie I I I I I I ¡Ie I I I I I I I Ie I II. PROJECTS IN PROGRESS - CONTRACTS AWARDED Construction (I)Engineering Expended Project Name Cost Fees Total To Date Rufe Snow II $1,647,395 $139,974 $1,887,544 $1,716,394 Fair Meadows C/O 49,275 (2) Contingency 50,900 Walkers Branch 600,000 58,500 676,500 274,288 Contingency 18,000 Morgan Meadows West 139,000 19,327 162,497 125,274 Contingency 4,170 Snow Heights 554,120 74,735 755,746 604,377 Windell C/O 107,056 Contingency 19,835 Rufe Snow Signalization 120,000 16,686 140,286 1 0 , 1 06 Contingency 3,600 Storm Drainage 80,000 80,000 15,967 Master Plan Davis Blvd. 100,000 100,000 20,000 (Southbound) TOTAL $3,413,351 $389,222 $3,802,573 2,766,406 (1) Includes standard engineering fee (5.5% to 9.5%) plus 5% for right of way and site acquisition, layout, field control, assessment procedures, redesign, processing grant/loans, etc. (2) 3% Contingency on all Street/Drainage Projects. I I I_ I I I I I I -_ I I I I I I I I- I III. PROJECTS TO BE INITIATED IN 1984 - CURRENTLY UNDER DESIGN Project Name Calloway Acres (1) Contingency Mickey & Center Street Contingency Flory Street Contingency Glenview Contingency (Booth Calloway to Willman) Lola - unpaved section/ including drainage Contingency TOTAL Estimated Construction Cost Estimated Engineering Fee 246,700 7,401 33,033 141,000 4,230 19,606 200,000 6,000 27,810 210,000 6,300 -0- 65,000 5,000 2,100 $888,731 $85,449 (1) Scruggs, Parchman and Cross street paving Total 287,134 164,836 233,810 216,300 72,100 $974,180 I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ; ßYClenView - Rufe Snow to ~~ Haltom City Limits II arwood - Bob to Grapevine lie II IV. OTHER STREET/DRAINAGE PROJECTS - 1984 PROGRAM TO BE DETERMINED Project Name Estimated Construction Cost Estimated Engineering Fee 8,635 12,070 6,680 7,163 4,845 7,19l 7,790 3,600 4,826 8,ll3 10,944 5,529 5,823 286 $93,495 0 4,674 $98,169 $1,152,459 Total From Prior Bond Programs ~ .J.,~ ~f.) , ' 'i':.;/ -.~~ Harmonson Phase II .,-- .j' J.., . ,'-' ../ ~"'\ ,_ . It/' Sheridan Drive {j,,/,. t' · y,..1'" Terry y~~, J J .i....' VLÞ'yv'\) $90,900 99,535 l42,000 154,070 70,400 77,080 Matson 75,400 82,563 55,845 Dent 51,000 Paramount (\~ ~; '0 l:,~ !~ ft~\ LJ 40,000 75,700 82,891 Garwood 82,000 89,790 Laurel 36,400 Linma I; " 55,626 50,800 Bewley ~ 93,513 85,400 Keeter II ...., \\ ) \.../ 126,144 l15,200 Arnold Terrace f." \:) 63,729 58,200 Cloyce t~ \~,~'\) 67,123 61,300 Cynthia " \ 28,886 28,600 Sub-total $l,023,300 3% Construction Contingency 5% Engineering Contingency 30,990 o TOTAL $l,054,290 Unspecified Street & Drainage $1,826,883 Future Bond Programs Watauga Road (Rufe Snow to Davis) ." {}M.~ ~ $ 935,000 included $935,000 Hwy. 388,000 included 388,000 1,820,000 included 1,820,000 I I _ I I I I II I I ,_ I I I I I I I I_ I v. OTHER PROJECTS - PUBLIC BUILDINGS Project Name Public Works/Utility Service Center Police Facility Animal Control Shelter Unspecified Building Projects TOTAL Estimated Construction Cost $466,000 Unknown Unknown 689,286 $1,155,286 I I I_ I I I I I I -_ I I I I I I I Î- I VI. RECOMMENDED CHANGES Total Budget Hewitt Drainage Morgan Meadows East Big Fossil Drainage Right-of-way Purchase Establish Unspecified Street and Drainage Fund $547,033 803,919 175,357 200,000 -0- Change Recommended delete delete delete delete 1,827,823 I I I_ I I I I I I ,_ II I I I I I I '_ I I MINUTES TO THE CIP MEETING NOVEMBER 3, 1983 Present: Jim Ramsey Richard Davis Rodger Line Dennis Horvath Gene Riddle Richard Albin Mayor Pro Tern Councilman City Manager Asst. City Manager Public Works Director City Engineer The following priorities were established for projects in the CIP: Richard Albin was directed to proceed with final engineering, assessment rolls and all necessary documentation for priorities 1-3. Items are to be ready for bid but not bid until approved by the full Council. Priori ty 1. Priori ty 2. Priori ty 3. (1) Priority 4. (2) Priority 5. Calloway Acres Flory Street Hewitt Drainage Big Fossil Drainage Mickey & Center Streets (1) It was decided that any action on the Big Fossil Drainage project should be held in abeyance until our next meeting. (2) The Mickey and Center Street project will be put on hold until the final determination is made by the City Council if this item should be dropped from the CIP. Gene Riddle was asked to explore the possibility of vacating the right-of-way on Center Street. Richard Albin was directed to prepare cost estimate for M,ickey within the next 60 days. Included in the estimate will be all drainage work and right-of-way acquisition costs. Note: Morgan Meadows East - RNL will contact Mac Garvin in one final attempt to secure necessary easements. This project will be discussed by the City Council to determine if it will also be dropped from the CIP. Richard Albin was directed to proceed with the reinspection of College Hills tank and take whatever corrective action is necessary. The Harmonson project will be deleted from the CIP and the $99,535 will be allocated to Public Works for overlay projects next spring. Richard Albin was directed to prepare a change order to the Rufe Snow contract to add Fair Meadows. The Staff was directed to proceed with the bids on the Rufe Snow signalization and to have these bids ready for Council approval in January. I I Ie I I I I I I 161 I I I Page Two The remaInIng $34,000 in the Davis Blvd. project is to remain avail- able for a future southbound lane currently under negotiation. Richard Albin was directed to obtain cost estimate for that portion of Lola that is uncurbed for all drainage and pavement work necessary. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey requested a 15 minute session in Pre-Council to review CIP progress with the full Council. Next CIP Meeting is scheduled for early December. II I I I Ie I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I, Ie 1- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS STREET AND DRAINAGE TAX SUPPORTED PROJECTS Completed Projects Projects in Progress Projects To Be Initiated - Under Design Other Street/Drainage Projects Other Projects TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS 1980-1982-1983 Bond Sales Transfer to ClP in June Transfer to C.IP in August Interest Construction Fund Transfer/Pre-l980 CIP- Miscellaneous Income Assessment Income TOTAL $2,270,355 4,825,190 2,412,089 1,152,459 1,155,286 $11,815,379 7,000,000 1,000,000 1,842,000 976,648 705,933 229,581 61,217 $11,815,379 ,I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I. COMPLETED PROJECTS Project Name Lewis Drive Industrial Park Glenview, Phase I (820 to Booth Calloway) Rufe Snow, Phase I Dawn Drive Jerri Jo/Eldorado Davis & Main Signals Topographic Mapping Overlay Projects Seal Coating - Contract Seal Coating - County Loop 820/Rufe Snow Turn Lane Sale of GO Bonds TOTAL Budget $ll4,4l6 13,503 107,400 1,089,519 429,454 82,114 32,646 39,800 l20,141 107,493 66,520 8,252 59,097 $2,270,355 Expended To Date $114,416 13,503 107,400 1,089,519 429,454 82,114 32,646 39,800 120,141 107,493 66,520 8,252 59,097 $2,270,355 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I, II. PROJECTS IN PROGRESS - CONTRACTS AWARDED Project Name Rufe Snow Phase II (2)Contingency Walkers Branch Contingency Morgan Meadows West Contingency North Hills Contingency SnÐW Heights Contingency Holiday North Contingency Rufe Snow Signalization Contingency Storm Drainage Master Plan Davis Blvd. Highway TOTAL Construction Cost (I) Engineering Fees Total Expended To Date $1,647,395 49,421 $1,874,981 $845,268 178,165 (3) 800,000 24,000 9l4,640 59,104 90,640 139,000 4,170 19,327 162,497 31,756 539,489 16,184 63,902 619,575 494,291 554,120 16,623 65,635 636,378 449,094 279,091 8,372 37,370 324,833 198,988 120,000 3,600 16,686 - 140,286 6,206 80,000 80,000 3,439 72,000 o 72,000 38,374 $4,273,465 $551,725 $4,825,190 $2,088,558 (1) Includes standard engineering fee (5.5% to 9.5%) plus 5% for right of way and site acquisition, layout, field control, assessment procedures, redesign, processing grant/loans, etc. (2) 3% Contingency on all St~eet/Drainage Projects. (3) $455,840 currently under contract. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I III. PROJECTS TO BE INITIATED - UNDER DESIGN Project Name Estimated Estimated Construction Cost Engineering Fee Right of Way Purchase Hewitt Drainage 470,000 62,933 Contingency 14,100 Calloway Acres 246,700 33,033 Contingency 7,401 Big Fossil Drainage 150,OOO 20,857 Contingency 4,500 Morgan Meadows East 700,000 82,919 Contingency 21,000 ~lickey & Center Street l41,000 19,606 Contingency 4,230 Flory Street 200,000 27,810 Contingency 6,000 TOTAL $1,964,931 $247,178 Total $200,000 547,033 287,134 175,357 803,919 164,836 233,810 .. $2,412,089 I I Ie I I I I I :1 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I IV. OTHER STREET/DRAINAGE PROJECTS Proj ect Name From Prior Bond Programs Harmonson Phase II Sheridan Drive Terry Matson Dent Paramount Garwood Laurel Linma Bewley Keeter Arnold Terrace C10yce Cynthia Sub-total 3% Construction Contingency 5% Engineering Contingency TOTAL Future Bond Programs G1enview - Rufe Snow to Haltom City Limits Harwood - Bob to Grapevine Hwy. Glenview - Booth Calloway to Willman Watauga Rd. - Rufe Snow to Davis Blvd. Estimated Construction Cost $90,900 142,000 70,400 75,400 51,000 75,700 82,000 36,400 50,800 85,400 l15,200 58,200 61,300 28,600 $1,023,300 30,990 o $l,954,290 Estimated Engineering Fee 8,635 12,070 6,680 7,163 4,845 7,191 7,790 3,600 4,826 8,ll3 10,944 5,529 5,823 286 $93,495 0 4,674 $ 98.,169 Total 99,535 154,070 77,080 82,563 55,845 82,891 89,790 40,000 55,626 93,513 126,l44 63,729 67,123 28,886 $1,152,459 I I lie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I v. OTHER PROJECTS - PUBLIC BUILDINGS Project Name Public Works/Utility Service Center Police Facility Animal Control Shelter Unspecified TOTAL Estimated Construction Cost $466,000 Unknown Unknown 689,286 $1,155,286 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I \ NORTH HILLS HOLIDAY NORTH Briley Circular N. Hills Drive Reeves Orient Northcutt Windall Susan Lee Randall Mary Francis Cummings Dr. E Orient SNOW HEIGHTS OVERLAY ED Victoria Holiday Lane Vance Redondo Oakland Lola Riveria College Circle Emerald Oaks Lynn Terrace Roberta Nor East Holiday Lane Willow Crest CALLOWAY ACRES Parchman Cross Scruggs SEAL COATED CONTRACTED/County COMPLETED Eden Road Rumfield Road Kirk Lane Crane Road Martin Dirve Cardinal Lane Valleyview Parkway Amundson Walter Cliff SiDDIlons Smithfield Rd. Starnes Green Valley Douglas Lane Higþtower Meadow Road Hewitt Street College Circle Valley Drive Continental Trail Bursey Road Rogene Jerrell Marie Charles Ash Colorado Clark Gibbons Joreen Grove Standley Maplewood Birchwood College Cr. S Maple Deaver Terry Owen Post Oak Briarridge Ct. Noneman Payte Crabtree Lowery Lowery Ct. Odell Lancashire Yarmouth Dorchester I' DATE: 2-23-84 ~I II ~JECT~ Flory Street Paving & Drainage Improvements I' DEPARTMENT: Public W~rks I BACKGROUND : , I~ I I I" I I_ I I II CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: I I BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: I -----------~------------ I I- I This .project is estimated to 'cost $400,000. Of that amount $81,318.68 will come from assessments leaving a net of $318,681.32. This cost would þe·reduced by '$157,305.00 by utility adjustments leaving a net cost from general obligation bonds of $164,376.32. . . On this project we are going to need 34 parcels of extra right of way in order to·<;io·.th·is project.:' I estimate the cost of purchasing these parcels to be $20,000 which would < need to be added to the cost of the project. ,'1/1 A·'-:>.Af'Lh_ D.L (,. l,~·:µr,......v-_-V í1 --. , '¡ /é L) L~< ill ~a-- ~., LV' ( . c~·· -rt Set the date for benefit hearing, authorize bids to be taken and set a date to awarp the contract on Flory Street Paving & . " ,~J ~.....)v'-( Drainage Improvements. YES x NO General Obligation Bonds -~~-~------~-~--~~~~~-~~------~~~-~---~---~~~--~-~-~-~._~ I- ·1" Ie I I I I 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I K NOWL TON-E NG LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas February 23, 1984 Mr. Gene Riddle, Dir. of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-219, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FLORY STREET PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT ROLL TRANSMITTAL In acordance with your request, we have prepared an Assessment Roll for the referenced project based on estimated construction costs and in accordance with the provisions of the City's Assessment Resolution No. 79-28. All assumptions made in Assessment Rate calculations are included in the material transmitted herewith. Also included is an Engineer's Estimate of construction costs tabulation. This project includes curb and gutter, paving, and storm drainage construction on Flory Street between Grapevine Highway and Glenview Drive. Thirty-seven (37) separate parcels of property front along these streets and the associated Assessment Roll enclosed herewith is based on a compilation of the latest available ownership information recorded at the Tarrant County Courthouse. We have also prepared documents for acquisition of thirty-four (34) parcels of new right-of-way along Flory Street as required for widening to a 3D-foot section, and these documents are being transmitted under separate cover. We will be available at the February 27 Council meeting to answer any questions you or the Council may have concerning preparation of this Assessment Roll. Meanwhile, please call if we can be of further service in this regard. ~~,~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 ~ I' i t t I] I· I I ~ - .. i : ! : ~ ! ~ 1: :: .J ~ : i i I . J , .,) I i i .a ii : I~j:: !Ijli I~':~I .. I' ¡ : e '~ :' I 1:5 . .... II' .. ,,'I :~ , it ~w I : I I I I 1 .. ~; '. .¡ @" I ~ ~ ~= i,; C - ~ ~~ J =. r~ r '- _ ¡ : ~¡ j; ~ ¡ ~ t IF :i j Iii "~i jl.š ¡ J.: I ~ ~ "I! ~ ! ii~~c: :¡ J _~""~if~ ¡~.. I' .... ,·~":Q·1 § ~ :." .'ID!. i ~... A "~,.,,,~ . ' I ' .. 1ft... "" I I ' , -.:------ ""It ..... '-- · t I . . e ~ ~ r "~ ;r- I ; I .1 0, I' ~ .' i~.:!~ ·.ûla . ,!",:Æi iï ~ii , j i .~= 4U -.. ¡¡ rq, e I I I I .1 ¡ I ~, ~- 4- ~ ! 1 I~ I 11 .. J ~~¡;ZT ~ ¡! -. +.~... .,. .. . " ~. / ~.04 , , .. I , '. I :1 ... .. ."'.., . ')e..-s If"" _.~:'~... ~ It I ~ -.......,.., ~ I' I '¡rr-'- '.. .... · · h :1":: 1': I " i ,¡ "' :i OO.,t '.15 ~n 1<:11.... ~ ; &'~ ~ ~Ii;f~'! ! I ~~! ii ~; ~ @.' n III ¡ ~ !' j ~ Ii i¡ ~ o. ~: š :; @ ;' :v _ _ ;; ! ':-: 1'1 '-.,-.4 : · ~ 0 ¡;,.. ..0 . ,'-J.W I!~ ! ~ ~f~I,t$'\.- _ I' -0 · r ' -:- -~ ~- ~ : - .:-~.: 2 · _: 'CJ L- ~ ' ... .; ! ..', , _ ¥.. ~ ',. ~:: 0 - ...~ - ..e ,- --, -- -- ~_O- · - ,- J '" ;;; i~ ¿., i:' ~ -" ... :~i-:j-:¡e .,.. -, !' ~: -;;- i- ! ' . _ . . I --1 .. .- ¡E,'-:f'-,:=,:" ~ \ 'I :::; v ª ~i.,· . I to'\...v. .:¡. ," .. ¡ · _ _ .. ~ ',\()J g .". I ~.,. ...! I· = ,; ~ ~æ ~ c " - .. .- .. -, i~ ~ ~ . t' · : - i : ~ tð'I I. --........ II" . ! : r I." - ~ ! . ,. . ... . i . '~. .,.. ....... L.... " e .. : - f ,",0 . ~. ~ · ~ ¡Jf~ , .: j.,.,= 1~~1!:t ii ! 5 Hi~~~ @¡OL' ¡ -"-~ ' : ... ¡ i iLi':~~ ~f·~':~:· .. ..:: ¡ I~:; -.. " W _I; !~. 0 E..~~¡i ~ ;: ',.'j" .. .. !:E I: I ' ~ t&J H ~ I: ª - ¡ 5 = ¡ . , ¡ , ~ i ....: .. ~¡; - I . ~ ~Ol- ~' , ò ~! r ,I: -: .. .. I u z eo- In- ~ !! i & 'i ~' 1"'" :. ~: ~ ;,! : ~-:; :1 -' ~ - ¡ ~ ~ ,I~ ~ ~ f . Jo, ¡"" - ~ = ; ~ .:8 iii' i.' . . _ "':W! . ~ u" I r ~ · ~ ,! ~ ¡; ~ ~¡I ~ , ", .' .J: !: :: ¡ i! (§) ~ ¡ 5 d ~ ;«: ¡¡. I ' I ~ ; "I : S -! ì j .. i = :;; @) li~.j J~:.;; ~ro ~ ~ ~i~~;i i ~ .. ~ I ,'~ ; I. ~.i.~i'" ~ V if -= ~~ . ~ It" I ¡ ! - . I I I i ~ j j' '. , " i: U : e I '. I \ ;.1 3,.\1..0 "31/i1131'J ¡ . OWO¥ Þ()$ÞOc...., ... i ~...~ Þ 1___- H @ :i ·1 ~"" .! i : i-li·C ;.1· ..I~ :.¡ i ~ I i . ~tO ! I .. Ë . 'µ ~ ..... . . -j., ' ' :: t": ~ ' , ~ : š -1M I ¡j i.' :: as ! .1....- : 1:::1 ~ I ..,1= T - 1--·...1:..& ï . i ;'1" I ¡:-. æ ~ ~ : .!ifrri ~: : : IS:: / . 0 i¡: ; !¡:~ææ~ I!' ¥ ......~ ..:'. ! ,/ =1!.:..,.......::l1 . ! ~ .~.i ~ I ~. i ~ i i ~ tfih i & it. 'f~ I:: '=~Ió ~ .~. ;~ - 'C) 5i;~!~~- Ii! ¡:t-ii; ~I= 0,,,, =~ .'~ I -:' =;.¡ · ~" ~ ' 'I;:~!¥ Ii to-. W·. i' I' ¡ .~ i : i ~ : ! : .: I 'òI - , rl .., .~; ,. t:t~ :W;" ~ IÕ) !IÌ~I f J ¿.... " .. ana ;.; ~ ,r)'" ¡ ..'lllt: I... r @ ¡. ~;crï" IS)_ a :''''1U'';-: Sit ... :J" I ~ '. "'I ~ ¡:-I. ~ I;i: ; __..~f.. I -!' ~-' t I. . Š @ ;, I ':~_J- oo·gt "1S 3N11 H:)1WW : ! E1 . ~ L~: . =¡ : .~ @ .... .. I ¡ I . : .. -~I"J.. ~::'J ;I§ ~ I 'I 1;1;::1: t ;tl.~~ ,_;i I ~I ~!~~! ! -5 I ¡ ~t.·:,5 _I ~~'"' " : '1 !", ..... ..- i~ ,¡II I,-'~ § : ... --: ¡ e' ~ Ò ~ ¡ : ~ let I;~i~e (II! ~i[~ I' : I I : , I-f ~.., ...., - . I I '.. .. I'" .S ~."" t I !I ~_ ~ ¡i·' : ..!~~.:" ~ .~u -~ .: I. I ~¥~!~~;": ~:: - OJ t : I i ~ . ::~;!~:~i æ . ~~; ,: ; I 1:1 ~,' .'\ · 1I1~ ~.: ~to"; I ~I ! ~. "1!'. I : " I tt't\ e- . \' ,.,~ 00·' ·".1S ::fiIll Þ01'" ,. . . i~ i It . ¡ ji - i - Ii I~ ... ji å . Ie ¡ ~ . I: e .1 """1' I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS FOR FLORY STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FEBRUARY, 1983 TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS: 211 Type 1'011 HMAC on 6" of Type IIAII HMAC (Total Pavement Thickness = 8 inches), on 8" of lime stabilized subgrade, with 6-inch curb and 24-inch gutter, and underground storm drainage on Flory Street. Improvements extend from Grapevine Highway to Glenview Drive. ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATIONS 1. Based on' estimated construction prices and quantities of construction by Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers, November 16, 1983. 2. Assessment Rates based on Resolution 79-28: For Non-Residential Zoning, Curb and Gutter Assessment Rate is 100% of the cost of construction, and Paving and Storm Drainage Assessment is 40% of construction cost. 3. Appropriate credit is granted for existing curb and gutter depending on the amount of repair and realignment required. CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT RATES 6-inch Curb and 24-inch Gutter Estimated Unit Price = $5.00 Plus 10% for Contingencies = 0.50 TOTAL CURB AND GUTTER COST PER F.F. PAVING ASSESSMENT RATES = $5.50 ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION OF ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST Unclassified Street Excavation C.Y. 5000.00 $5.00 $25000.00 Stabilized Subgrade S.v. 9045.00 1.25 11306.25 Lime for Stabilized Subgrade S.V. 181.00 75.00 13575.00 Prime Coat S.Y. 8405.00 0.25 2101.25 Tack Coat S.Y. 21153.00 0.05 1057.65 Type ItAII HMAC, 21. Course S.V. 22487.00 2.60 58466.20 Type liD" HMAC, 2" Course S.V. 7054.00 2.60 18340.40 TOTAl ASHPHAL, PAVING CONSTRUCTION COST. $129846.75 Plus 10% Contingencies . . . . 12984.68 TOTAl ASPHALT PAVING COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $142831.43 PAGE 1 I I Ie I I I - I I I Ie I 'I I I I I I Ie I ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS FOR FLORY STREET, continued. TOTAL PAVING FRONT FOOTAGE ON FLORY = 2 X (STA. 24+81 - STA. 0+27) = 2 X ( 2454 ) = 4908 F.F. GRAND TOTAL PAVING FRONT FOOTAGE IN THIS PROJECT = 4,908 F.F. TOTAL PAVING COST PER FRONT FOOT = $ 142,831.43 / 4,908 F.F. = $ 29.10 PER F.F. TOTAL PAVING ASSESSMENT RATE PER FRONT FOOT = 0.40 X $ 29.10 = $ 11.64 PER F.F. DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT RATES DESCRIPTION OF ITEM ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. EACH EACH 1811 RCP 21" RCP 24" RCP 2711 RCP 5' Curb Inlet la' Curb Inlet 32.00 40.00 32.00 20.00 3.00 1.00 TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . Plus 10% Contingencies ......... TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE COSTS ....... GRAND TOTAL PAVING FRONT FOOTAGE IN THIS PROJECT TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE COST PER F.F. = $ 10,348.80 / 4,908 F.F. $23.00 24.00 26.00 29.00 1500.00 1800.00 $736.00 960.00 832.00 580.00 4500.00 1800.00 $9408.00 940.80 $10348.80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT RATE PER F.F. = 0.40 X $ 2.11' FULL COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY TOTAL CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT RATE TOTAL ASPHALT PAVING ASSESSMENT RATE TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT RATE GRAND TOTAL COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT RATE = 4,908 F.F. = $ 2.11 PER F.F. = $ 0.84 PER F.F. = $ 5.50 PER F.F. = $ 11.64 PER F.F. = $ 0.84 PER F.F. = $ 17.98 PER F.F. ~-------------~-~---~----~~ ~----------~---~~---------~ PAGE 2 I I 'e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS FOR FLORY STREET, continued. BASED ON THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS ASSESSMENT POLICIES THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ASSESSMENT RATE REDUCTION FACTORS ARE APPLIED (SUBJECT TO . CITY COUNCIL MODIFICATION): CURB & ASPHAL STORM ZONING OR LAND USAGE GUTTER PAVING DRAINAGE Commercial (Front) 1.00 0.40 0.40 Commercial (Side) 1.00 0.30 0.30 Commercial (Rear) 1.00 0.20 0.20 Residential (Front) 0.60 0.25 0.25 Residential (Side) 0.40 0.17 0.17 Residential (Rear) 0.30 0.13 0.13 THE REDUCTION FACTORS TABULATED ABOVE ARE APPLIED TO THE FOllOWING ESTIMATED UNIT CONSTRUCTION COSTS PER FRONT FOOT: CONSTRUCTION ITEM: CURB & GUTTER $5.50 STORM DRAINAGE $2.11 ASPHALT PAVING $29.10 ADJUSTED ASSESSMENT RATES BASED ON THE UNIT PRICES AND FACTORS TABULATED ABOVE: CURB & ASP HAL STORM TOTAL ASSM. ZONING OR LAND USAGE GUTTER PAVING DRAINAGE RATE/F.F. Commercial (Front) 5.50 11.64 0.84 $17.98 Commercial (Side) 5.50 8.73 0.63 $14.86 Commercial (Rear) 5.50 5.82 0.42 $11.74 Residential (Front) 3.30 7.28 0.53 $11.10 Residential (Side) 2.20 4.95 0.36 $7.51 Residential (Rear) 1.65 3.78 0.27 $5.71 Note: See Assessment Roll Tabulation for Front Foot Rates applied to each property unit along Flory Street. I· FLORY STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel imi nary Ie ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 I UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * F LOR Y S T R E E T * * * ( West Side) I 1. Bassiony Rhima Jack M. Estes, Sub. 5411 Sandusky Ct. Pt. of Lot 8 I Arlington, Tx. 76016 YOL. 7364, PG. 2002 221.30 $17.98 $165.00 $3813.97 2. Walker Con st. Co. Jack M. Estes, Sub. I P.O. Box 18397 S 1/2 Lot 9 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 7424, PG. 405 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 3. Allison & Henry Contr. Jack M. Estes, Sub. I 3725 Flory Drive Lot 10 R Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 388-161, PG. 38 300.00 17.98 0.00 5394.00 Ie 4. James M. Walkers, Inc. Jack M. Estes, Sub. dba Walker Const. Co. S 1/2 of S 1311 Lot 11 P.O. Box 18397' VOL. 5347,' PG. 974 I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 65.50 17.98 0.00 1177.69 5. James M. Walkers, Inc. Jack M. Estes, Sub. dba Walker Const. Co. N 1/2 of S 1311 Lot 11 I P.O. Box 18397 YOL. 5529, PG. 756 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 65.50 17.98 99.00 1078.69 I 6. James M. Walkers, Inc. Jack M. Estes, Sub. dba Walker Const. Co. N 69' Lot 11 P.O. Box 18397 VOL. 5354, PG. 36 I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 69.00 17.98 27.50 1213.12 7. Houseman Finane. Corp. Jack M. Estes, Sub. 3809 Flory Street - Lot 12 A 1 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 7543, PG. 1994 200.00 17.98 0.00 3596.00 8. W.F. Waites Jack M. Estes, Sub. I 3821 Flory Street Lot 13 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 1762, PG. 487 200.00 17.98 0.00 3596.00 I PAGE 1 OF 8 Ie I I FLORY STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel im; nary Ie ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L l February, 1984 II UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * F LOR Y S T R E E T * * * ( West Side ) I 9. Henry D. B.esson & Jack M. Estes, Sub. Colleen N. Besson Lot 7 B I 4005 Scruggs YOL. 388-93, PG. 511 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 152.00 $17.98 $39.60 $2693.36 I 10. William T. Pratt & Jack M. Estes, Sub. Pauline Pratt Lot 8 D 3911 Flory YOL. 5331, PG. 97 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 50.00 17.98 100.00 $799.00 I 11. William T. Pratt & Jack M. Estes, Sub. Pauline Pratt Lot 8 C Ie 3915 Flory , YOL. 5331, PG. 98 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 50.00 17.98 0.00 899.00 I 12. R.W. Jackson Jack M. Estes, Sub. 3917 Flory Lot 8 B Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 2553, PG. 244 50.00 17.98 0.00 899.00 I 13. Jerry P. Birdwell & Jack M. Estes, Sub. Carroll L. Birdwell Lot 8 A 3918 Rufe Snow YOL. 4425, PG. 445 I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 50 . 00 17.98 0.00 899.00 14. Mary Jo Gaston Jack M. Estes, Sub. I 2346 Benrus Lot 9 San Antonio, Tx. 78228 YOL. 4693, PG. 388 200.00 17.98 0.00 3596.00 15. Mary Jo Gaston -Jack M. Estes, Sub. I 2346 Benrus Lot 10 San Antonio, Tx. 78228 YOL. 4693, PG. 388 140.00 17.98 0.00 2517.20 I 16. B&B Pest Control Jack M. Estes, Sub. 4023 Flory S 1/2 Lot 11 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 5736, PG. 488 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 II 17. William E. French Jack M. Estes, Sub. Rt. 1 Box 45A N 1/2 Lot 11 Ie Chico, Tx. 76030 YOL. 3786, PG. 528 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 :1 PAGE 2 OF 8 I FLORY STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Ie Prel imi nary ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L I February, 1984 I UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * F LOR Y S T R E E T * * * I ( West Side) 18. James C. Craine & Jack M. Estes, Sub. Jean B. Craine Lot 12 A I 6900 Meadow Rd. YOL. 4703, PG. 965 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76180 70.00 $17.98 $0.00 $1258.60 I 19. J. Craine Jack M. Estes, Sub. 6900 Meadow Rd. Lot 12 B Ft. Worth, Tx. 76180 VOL. 4588, PG. 658 130.00 17.98 0.00 2337.40 I * * * F LOR Y S T R E E T * * * ( East Side ) Ie 20. Mary Gladys Snow & A.G. Walker Surv. Lonnie R. Snow Abst. 1630, Tr. 4U1 2300 N. 19th VOL. 1794, PG. 2 I Springfield, MO. 97477 193.30 17.98 0.00 3475.53 21. Bryan M. Mitchell Jack M. Estes, Sub. I 6813 Grapevine H~. Lot 1 less N.W. Cor. Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 6680, PG. 325 25.20 17.98 41.58 411.52 22. Walker Canst. Co. Bryan Plaza Addn. I P.O. Box 18397 NW Corn. L. 1, B. 1 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 7103, PG. 1760 74.80 17.98 0.00 1344.90 I 23. Walker Canst. Co. Bryan Plaza Addn. P.O. Box 18397 Lot 3, Block 1 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 388-127, PG. 03 502.61 17.98 330.00 8706.93 I 24. F.J. Fanning A.G. Walker Surv. 7040 Hovenkamp Abst. 1630, Tr. 4Z Ft. Worth~ Tx. 76118 YOL. 5806, PG. 133 110.00 17.98 363.00 1614.80 I 25. F.J. Fanning A.G. Walker Surv. 7040 Hovenkamp Abst. 1630, Tr. 4Z1D I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 4751, PG. 624 79.00 17.98 165.00 1255.42 26. Ronnie D. Hutchens A.G. Walker Surv. t' etux Sharon R. Abst. 1630, Tr. 4Z1 4112 Yance Road VOL. 7044, PG. 1791 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 80.00 17.98 440.00 998.40 ~I PAGE 3 OF 8 I FLORY STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS I City of North Richland Hills, Texas Prel imi nary 1_ ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 I UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. 27. Lloyd Tabor A.G. Walker Surv. I Rt. 2, Box 57 Abst. 1630, Tr. 4Z1A Decatur, Tx. 76234 VOL. 4319, PG. 416 80.00 17.98 0.00 1438.40 I 28. Joe V. Henry Henry Addi ti on 125 Cooper Lot lA, Block 1 Hurst, Tx. 76053 VOL. 388-177, PG. 63 95.00 17.98 0.00 1708.10 I 29. A-I Approver Pool Serve A.G. Walker Surv. 2654 Gravel St. Abst. 1630, Tr. 4Q Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 7547, PG. 1811 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 I 30. Lowell B. Allison Henry Addition 3725 Flory Lot 2, Block 1 1_ Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 388-133, PG. 42 153.00 17.98 0.00 2750.94 31. Bertha Geneva Hansen A.G. Walker Surv. 3208 Glenda Abst. 1630, Tr. 4R I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76117 VOL. 5678, PG. 483 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 32. Anita Louise A. Snow, A.G. Walker Surv. I Jerry Dean Anglin, etal. Abst. 1630, Tr. 4Rl 3601 Labadie VOL. 5769, PG. 283 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 I 33. Jesse A. Sawyer A.G. Walker Surv. 2933 Gumwood Park Abst. 1630, Tr. 4P1 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 4908, PG. 416 165.00 17.98 0.00 2966.70 I 34. William T. Marcom. Jr. A.G. Walker Surv. 4020 Flory Abst. 16~0, Tr. 4P3-4P1B I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 7511, PG. 1200 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 35. H.F. Perkins & Jeanette A.G. Walker Surv. I 5303 Northridge Blvd. N. Abst. 1630, Tr. 4M Ft. Worth, Tx. 76180 VOL. 2761, PG. 476 50.00 17.98 0.00 899.00 36. Larry C. Young A.G. Walker Surv. I P.O. Box 3488 Abst. 1630, Tr. 4Kl Irving, Tx. 75061 YOL. 7357, PG. 2101 50.00 17.98 0.00 899,.00 1_ PAGE 4 OF 8 :1 I' I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I f' I FLORY STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Pre' imi nary ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. 37. Larry C. Young A.G. Walker Surv. P.O. Box 3488 Abst. 1630, Tr. 4Kl Irving, Tx. 75061 VOL. 7357, PG. 2101 250.00 17.98 0.00 4495.00 G RAN D TOT A L S 4621.21 1770.68 81318.68 PAGE 5 OF 8 I' I_ I I I I I I I il_ I I I I I I I t' I FLORY STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Prel imi nary * * * * * ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L SUM MAR Y * * * * * February, 1984 * * * * CALCULATION OF APPARENT CREDITS * * * * UNIT PROPERTY OWNER CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT APPARENT TYPE NO. DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS USE 1. Bass;ony Rhima Exist. C & G 30.00 $5.50 $165.00 CF 5. James M. Walkers, Inc. Exist. Cone. Drive. 18.00 5.50 99.00 CS 6. James M. Walkers, Inc. Exist. C & G 5.00 5.50 27.50 CS 9. Henry D. Besson etal Exist. Cone. Drive. 18.00 2'.20 39.60 RS 21. Bryan M. Mitchell Exi st. Cone. Drive. 25.20 1.65 41.58 CR 23. Walker Const. Co. Exist. Cone. Drive. 60.00 5.50 330.00 CF 24. F.J. Fanning Ex; st. C & G 110.00 3.30 363.00 CF 25. F.J. Fanning Exist. C & G 30.00 5.50 165 . 00 CF 26. Ronnie D. Hutchens Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF PAGE 6 OF 8 I- CALLOWAY ACRES'STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel im; nary lie * * * * * ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L SUM MAR Y * * * * * February, 1984 I TOTAL (AVG. ) TOTAL TOTAL UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. A. Bassiony Rhima Unit No. 1 221.30 $17.98 $165.00 $3813.97 I B. Walker Const. Co. 2, 4, 5, 6, 22, 23 877.41 17.46 456.50 15319.33 C. Allison & Henry Contr. 3, 30 453.00 17.98 0.00 8144.94 1 D. Houseman Financ. Corp. 7 200.00 17.98 0.00 3596.00 I E. W.F. Waites 8 200.00 17.98 0.00 3596.00 F. Henry D Besson 9 152.00 17.72 39.60 2693.36 I G. William T. Pratt 10, 11 100.00 16.98 100.00 1698.00 H. R.W. Jackson 12 50.00 17.98 0.00 899.00 Ie I . Jerry po. Birdwell 13 50.00 17.98 0.00 899.00 I J. Mary Jo Gaston 14, 15 340.00 17.98 0.00 6113.20 K. B & B Pest Control 16 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 I L. William E. French 17 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 M. James C. Craine 18, 19 200.00 17.98 0.00 3596.00 I N. Mary Gl adys Snow 20 193.30 17.98 0.00 3475.53 I o. Bryan M. Mitchell 21 25.20 16.33 41.58 411.52 P. F.J. Fanning 22, 23 189.00 15.19 528.00 2870.22 I Q. Ronnie D. Hutchens 26 80.00 12.48 440.00 998.40 R. Lloyd Tabor 27 80.00 17.98 0.00 1438.40 I s. Joe V. Henry 28 95.00 17.98 0.00 1708.10 I T. A-I Approver Pool Serve 29 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 u. Bertha Geneva Hansen 31 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 Ie I PAGE 7 OF 8 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie :1 * * * * * CALLOWAY ACRES STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Prel imi nary ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L SUM MAR Y * * * * * February, 1984 TOTAL (AV G. ) TOTAL TOTAL UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. v. Anita Louise A. Snow, et 32 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 w. Jesse A. Sawyer 33 165.00 17.98 0.00 2966.70 x. William T. Marcom, Jr. 34 100.00 17.98 0.00 1798.00 Y. H.F. Perkins & Jeanette 35 50.00 17.98 0.00 899.00 z. Jarry C. Young 36, 37 300.00 17.98 0.00 5394.00 TOT A L S 4621.21 17.60 1770.68 81318.68 Total Estimated Construction Cost: $400000.00 Tota"' Estimated Assessments: 20~ 81318.68 -...--------- ----------- Total Estimated Const. Cost Less Assessments: $318681.32 PAGE 8 OF 8 I I Ie I I I I I' I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I - . - - -- ----- -...---. ... -------- -- --.--.- ----. - r- o. __.~-~.--_., ----:-- - ---, II~! ~T~-~~.IIIC. ¡ ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ~ '. ~1IoC ~I" -..... '. 0. . '~... -.' ;.-------..-~....- . --............-.-.~. -......-. OWN E R : C ; tv of 0 No r t h 'R; c h , and Hi'" s JOB "0 · PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Florv Street PavinQ and DrainaQe ImDrovements J'" ... 3-219 DÄ TE: ?-22-84 ~ DESCRIPTION OF ITEM ITEM UN IT ' TOTAL UHIT COST NO. ·QUANT I TV PR IC E PAVING AND DRAINAGE: Unclassified Street Excavation 1 C Y 56000 Ii nn· ( ?~ nnn nn Remove Exist. Curb & Gutter 2 L F 4.541 .. 4 no , R 1 fi 4 00 Remove Exist. Drives Sdwlks & Other Flatwork 3 S.F. 7.153 0.60 4 ?91 80 Lime Stabilized SubQrade 4 S.Y. 9'.045 1.25 11..306.25 lime for Stabilized SubQrade 5 TON 181 75.00 13~575,OO Prime Coat 6 S.Y. 8,405 0.25 2 101.25 Tack Coat 7 S.Y. 21.153 o 05 1 057.65 Type nAil. 2" Thick Course 8 S. Y. 22.487 2.60 58.466.20 Tvpe "D". 2" Thick Course 9 S.Y. 7.054 2.60 18.340.40 6" Curb and 24" Gutter 10 L.F. 4,541 5.00 22.705.00 Saw Cuts 11 L.F. 2,039 2.00 4.078.00 Tvpe "011 HMAC for Trans1tions 12 TON 604 ' 30.00 18,,120.00 6" Thick Concrete Drivewavs 13 S.F. 1 .. 89 5 3.00 5.685.00 6" Thick Concrete Valleys 14 S.F. 830 3.00 2.490..00 An; IJ~ t ~C\ Jw C\n M~nhnl p~ 15 FArH R ,,,n on ,., nnn nn At1ill~t wv ~ f" ... 1" ~ArH l' 1'c; nn 1 ~nn 'nn rr'u~hpt1 ·~tnnp (#;II Thi("k) 17 ~ V ñq7 ~ nn ~ !A'\ nn '?7" n;~ Tvnø TtT Qrp 1R , r: ,n ?q nn ' "Rn on '411 n;~ Tvnø TTt Qrp , 1Q I 1= ~, ?F\ nn A~? nn ?1" ni~ Tvnø TTT JH~P ?n , F' 4n >4 nn qF;n no 18" Dið ' TYnp lIT.. RCP 21 l A F 6 32 )3 on 736.00 , n I ~td Curb Tn1pt 2? EACH 1 1At ,n ...nn ' 1 Rn n on 51 Std.. Curb In1 et 23 EACH 3 15' ~O..OO 4 500 00 SUB-TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .......0............. ...... ...... .......... ... ... $221.773.55 - . WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS: · 1211 (C1. 50) 01 Water line 24 L. F. 455 35.00 $ 15,925.00 8" (DR ·18) PVC Wa ter p, pe 25 l.F. 1 .-~85 22.00 j2.670.00 61\ -t r.l ~ ~ 0' 0 T Wa t e r t ; n e 26 0 l.F 41 . 15 00 ",c; no 1?" hðt@ Vð'V~ &oBox, 27 EACH ? 1500 on 3 nnn no 'Bu. Gate Valve & Box 28 EACH 3 750. UO 2 250.00 6" Gate Val ve &' Box 29 EACH 6 350.00 2.100.00 Fi~e Hydrant 30 EACH 6 750.00 4 500.00 Duct,le Iron F,ttlngs 31 TON -2 3000.00 6,000.00 .S~ort S, ng 1 e . Wa.ter Se rv, ce l, nes 32 EACH 13 160.00 2,-080.00 Io{'lo S1nQle·1f[ater SerVlce r1nes 33 EACH 17 220.00 3 740.00 o 8 "...: (r.l c;o) or Watpr Pinp 34 , F '~n . ?? nn ñf\n nn ~ · SUB-TOTAL 0.:...........0............. 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . .. . $ 73·540 00· , SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS: . W' O,a. (OR 35) PVC 5S P,pe 35 L.F. 2,177 " .00 $47 t 894.00 811 Dia. eCl. 50) Dl SS P'De 36 L. F. 130 22.00 -2 ~860. 00 4" Di a. San; tary Sewer Service L; ne 37 L.F. 850 6.00 5,100.00 Unclassified Trench EKcavation (0'-6') 38 L.F. ]1 7.00 637.00 í-- ; . ~ .~ ( ~:' ", .¡ I I I- I -I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie :1 _.- - .-. ~ - ,--- _._. --------.- --_. .---- .---. .-.......... '_.~._-_._, 11~ ~ÓN..:~~.ftOWW.b.c. . ~ ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE \.:........ -.----- --.- - - -----. OWNER: City of-North· Richland Hills JOB HO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Flory Street Paving and Drainage Improvements I . J-' 3-219 DATE: 2-22-84·... ! DESCRIPT.ION OF ITEM ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT COST HO. ·QUANT tTY PR IC E Unclassified Trench Ex'cava ti on 6'-81) 39 L. F. 1.187 8.00 9.496.00 Unclassified Trench' Excavat10n 8 ..10') 40 L, F, 489 9.00' 4..401 00 Unclasslfled Trench Excavatlon 10 -12 ), 41 L. F. 213 .. 10.00 2,130.00 Unclasslfled Trench Excavatlon 12 -14 ) 42 L.F. 277 11.00 3,047.00 Std. TVDe II A" S.S. MH 51 DeeD 43 EACH 9 750.00 6 750.00 Extra DeDth S.S. MH 44 V. F. 19 50.00 950.00 Connection to Exist. 5.5. 45 L.S. 1 500.00 500.00 SUB-TOTAL . ...... ........ .... ................. .... ...... ...... ........... ....... $ 83.765.00 ~ . ~ . ~' . ; . ':" .' ' - · ~ · . ~ · , . . . . - , . . ~ . . -¡ . . . . . ~~7q n7A c;" ' :RE~& APPROVED~ SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST - --- . .. PLUS CONTINGENCIES 20,921.45 :~'-. .:: ... ad- (j). ~J p~ '";:"PRO~ECT ~MAGER TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $'400,000.00 ~ -- . . . .. . / , ." ! i~ - r :' ""0/ ¡ ., . ---- --- -- -.-. .. --.-.. -.. ----- .._- ..-~ - ," " I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I .....- DATE: "- -..... February 27, 1984 SUBJECT: Calloway Acres Street & Drainage Improvements DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: This project includes Parchman, Scruggs and Cross Street between Grapevine Highway and G1enview Drive. The estimated cost of this project is $600,000, estimated assessments is $116,681.43 which makes the project net cost to the city of $483,318.57. The utility adjustments on this project amount to approximately $92,645.00. This leaves a net cost on the project out of bond funds of $390,673.57. At the present time we are not requiring any extra right of way for this project. If the Council directs that this project go forward, authorization is needed to transfer an additional $145,500 from Unspecified projects to the Calloway Acres project. '6~ 71, ~~/ - - &( = ~ ' CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Set a date for a benefit hearing, authorization to bid the project and set a date to award the contract on Calloway Acres Street & Drainage Improvements and transfer $145,500 from Unspecified projects to Calloway Acres. BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: General Obligation Bonds I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas February 22, 1984 Mr. Gene Riddle, Dir. of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-330, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CALLOWAY ACRES STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT ROLL TRANSMITTAL In acordance with your request, we have prepared an Assessment Roll for the referenced project based on estimated construction costs and in accordance with the provisions of the City·s Assessment Resolution No. 79-28. All assumptions made in Assessment Rate calculations are included in the material transmitted herewith. Also included is an Engineer·s Estimate of construction costs tabulation. This project includes curb and gutter, paving, and storm drainage construction on Scruggs, Parchman, and Cross Streets between Grapevine Highway and Glenview Drive. Sixty-four (64) separate parcels of property front along these streets and the associated Assessment Roll enclosed herewith is based on a compilation of the latest available ownership information recorded at the Tarrant County Courthouse. We will be available at the February 27 Council meeting to answer any questions you or the Council may have concerning preparation of this Assessment Roll. Meanwhile, please call if we can be of further service in this regard. ~~, , RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. line, City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 ·1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I :1 1 ~ -tl,_ II ·f~ :.. t ~ (~ ). w > c: ;:) ~ '" \Ø Œ W x ... ~ y ~ c ~ ~ &I) CI) ~ c « I @!! i ¡; : ' ; 3 " ® ! ~~ J;. !~~~ - i _;= ~~~~ 0 .l . .. -- ~ a · i ® :i=~ ,--~;j~ Ii ~:~,·o~ ::= :; g8 i I ::I~i i ' · I - I;~ ~ ~ · r~:~-- ;:f: -t r" g~~~ -I .. I' W '~ ~;~ : , " . W I i~ I > ~.. .. I : :: : ;2.::= -_-+- -- \ : :i r.· .- c ~: n !i " I ta' 5 ~:::;:i~~ I ~ !if 3:tl~-'; I =..: r:=l..... .. I Eiij .. : ¡~ ": ¡¡ ~ " _ _ _ N ~! ªgl ~" :: ~ ~~ 5 ; ~ ! &,: --"' ~ :; :; ~ ~ ::: - : II - - \ ~ ~ : -::Mi® :;":~ ..-' .. t12h :: ;~¡~ :.-: r': '& _ i""a~ :=.:~ ~ ::::¡û ' . a :.~ ~ 'II ~ '" N ~:::=: If! ~-~---+- ; Mi : (§) I -- i ¡. . :5 ,¡ _ _ ~ r9I I = ¡¡ ~ - ri . !~....ri'; I .... "0' I · · .. . I::;:-û ::-.: - - Z.._·~ .å ~';I'-: i;!t.: 1 ~ ~.. ii u:=: h=...::::::I ¡. ~ :;¡ .;..:co '. : ~! ~ = =-.": .c - " - - I · _-----------1 "!ti.;;¡ .!C_ 'I ~~i ;.~;.: " "N t.;·· - :;:!=: ~ ~~ ~r ® ";;iM:::UÛ @' J I o=~M_~>'-----I: h~~ - -I : ,.' -.- n :~~~~ 0 ~~~::~ I // : ¡;i~ · ~:,=f: :: I~k& . : w~ai:; ;, 5 hi~j .: ! ,/ i5 ! w:' ï .. " / ¡~ ·w ,/ ''- i;~. I / I~ ,~::'~8: I!~!~I ~... ~ï' ..¡;.... ~8ï! ..~ .. ..."'.... ; ~ ! s J;>' · -:;, " .::> ~ ' ~:; ~ oo! ~-4..' . ~~.¡" ð'~ t. ~ .;; I ~ ... :. ¡: i lID ,,' J H!;~·~ ~I . ! 3NI1 H:).1 ~H ¡¡~~:: @J .1 ~ ~ ~ i ~ ; ÈI .0';: '. I K ~ -. . __.=-o e 1 01 ~¡ - . ." - .... - 8~!; : ! if Ë ~ ~ =~~i~ !~§:~ ... o z ~I ~ NOSNOWtIt~ 8- ~ ~: ~ ~i~; e ¡~!~.-: :: ... ~ Z t, ' ~ ;!i~~ : ~i~ : ~I! .I ..., ~., I I ¡~ ~ e [ I E;i:~ : ~ I i~t, ... - · "'. ö ~;.~ =.' .5. .. "-i~.- · · ;3~ tV .1 ;!!;.-: õ .:if~ :J~: ..f...:: ; ~ .~ · e I ~t =. I , . ~ ~. -~ .;............. i ~~~B = ~I I ~ I ~" ~I' .¡ è¡;¡ ~-:Q= -- ....'" : e :;~i ~ =:.;~- :I) ... .J: 0 &. ~ ~ ¡ ~ ~ ~ ; ~~ ~ ; õ - .. 5 k ¡ ~! ~ s - M e t, ;: !~:~..:: i"·&~- ;¡ f~æ35 /~ ~ ~f!¡I' ..;!= ...~.... "" .. ... .. ~ . ®}~ i ~ Ñ!! !~I:, 14~'''''¡ , I · I . I . I I I . , I I I I 1 I ! : ~ .: ~ I; ~ ~ ¡ I 0 1 I I IL '1 I I j I . i - . . : :::i~~ ~n~J' !:i!~i· !~:i:~~ /' . " '\\ " I I ·1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , " j 1:- ~ . ;; 'f8' ~ :. ~ aa-~ ':!~~--:ã ~~!:::~.. - a .... ........ .. .... ;!::~ ~ ~on @ ~:~ 0 I a ... f' 8_' ~š~ij . ....ON . t .. a _ ~Š..:~~= ··...0 -..--.. )0... '" > a: 0 ~ ~ en .0 ~¡ e J :::i~~..;_ õ ~:f::~1 8 c!!..:ëi~= - ....~. - . ---¡- ®~. ~ . .a Š ~I u - . c :! i~ ~ ~ t: ...~-~ ¥ ~: !!¿¡.-: -' c '"1:- ã~'=~ -:_u ~ ~ :: i:: ~:i" ..; . ..; -- ~ ~ -1- . : ~~~ : ~ =rr · .;lés:i";":_: 2_1''' .- ::::&....=~. i§:';ëi~= "'....~.. . -.. - ~ = ... !=~~ ~ ..;!~~~- :. .~a~~" ..; ; ~ : ~ ~ = ~: a'"''''.D @J .. [-.. /i ~ i ~HIO rt3INHYI' i r - -:l""\t ~ ~j ! I I ®, .¡ J t s - - i ~ ::2.: ;' ~ i o -.. -~ I' J ~~~"'5 : : ;;:i ~¡:: I "t --1. ;; ~;!: , " .. Jet) ':=. \'111 " ~: ~ --: ':Iš ;: "'ÞO-\ þoJ I ... .1 : ~å"'--: =2~ : . ~ : i ª ~ :¡~., ., .. . ~.. o , . ._~ ..: ë: 'Co) ; H ~3 ~Ih ~¡ oJ _ 8 § . ....'on ~ I ~'I : .. ~. it: I . ~ I :... £!S ~..: ~ 1, f~ ..I §~... ~: _I' ~ ~ "", -- ,~ ;..:~ I . '" g~ ~~~: : > ~. ~ ~ .O·UI " ~ " ~ o · - - --.:.. .~ = ¡_. on I ...... I1ih :; :J~!=r I(S ) .0.... It. :':~=I~' .:::å":": : - ~ Z ......:...:: û i I ~~¡ææ:~I§iª~~:~ " 1 ....r....... ~ :~l~ · 0 , @ 1 @ . _._J__.~__ ~. K I . \, =T ~ "\, . ... .. .o'n' , ... õ: ~ .,; , @ -'\ .. O\~ ~ 0\ - .., 8 5 ~: : i = ~ ..,. , :~:;:A-- 1-........· ·I.:a~; 1.,,-::;' i ~ i z:, L..~_:j 1 - ::s Õ . @ oJ .: ,. . -~ ¡ @ . r õ : ~ i ! · . · : · ::s ~ - I t I I ¡ i I !' -¡ I rg) õ : lit ~ -\ @ . : i . 00·6 '..1$ ~n 104:».1." (Z 'ON .13~ 3]s) .- . - ~ 4. · . .... . .- . . .133t1lS @ ..~ I : I Ie ~ I 1-- I ~ ~ I -:> ...: IU ~ I '" ¡ . ..~ I JS,) ~ '-I ~ $ $ 0 ~ :» I I .O·UI !~ ~~ ;:~; "'~ ... .. . '"'0 "'a_.. . ::.~...~ þ\ ::.:" ;;; ~i ~ ~ =-=I! -:..:... ::... ~~= õ : :: ·":S 0 = $-!oJ. ... .. . f ~ i¡@ : '·:i . :1... :: ~ .~~:-: ~ I Ë~~~: ~ I "C=::_ !; ® I~::r :ï~i~ .. ..... . :=~..;~ "--'-0 . -'-....... III Õ .. i . ~ ~ OO·L . US ~I' H:>J.t Oj (l "ON J33HS 33$) ....------- ~:----- Î ~ I . o . ~~-~~,..- ··l--~---·l---- - t-w_-- _ ~~ :: ¡ I I . ~.!: :~.: ~~,' ~~:~. _=:.:~ ~....~' = T i· ® ~ ~ ~ : : : ~: ~ : - - I r~ : ~ ~ ~ g i I ~~~~ ; J~r~ j : a: I c I I : ~ rg¡ ~ I ~ !' a: . ì ~ i I = r~ '~ :;1 :~~~Èr ,M - . ~." ..: 8;- - - v ~.: .1 ~~ ¿~ ~ 5 - . , ~ .,.. . i~ .. !ö ~ :I: c,:; , ~ .. . ~~ æ: ---~--- ~ o ¿ ~ i i: S t a . u ~ ~ ¡ ~, n ~~.- ~_ L ¡ : a: :: ; 10 :..,.... :... .it '!::__~ ... 1~ ,¿ z ¡ ~ õ ~. ,Y .-~..J ~ :/ I!.;:' := 3 /.1 ' oJ - IS ® ... 11 xI. J;~ ~~ o JK ¿ ~ ~ ;: o -§ . i z z :~® % = c..) .. 0 a: ~~ ~ . ~ -1 Õ ~ ¿ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ o = .. ~~ ... .. . '"' . " ~ ~ 0 e ~. ~~ ~: .... ~ ~ z o . . . ~3 · · ~ · = 0 __:L - .' '" .. · :i ~~ ª .. ~ô ~ ! f ,.. -- ~ -- \ .. ,.. . ~3 ¡- .J . ~ .. ",. ,.. .. . ~'" i: f ~ 5 --- W :: r i ¡ !~ i ¿?~: w . 'f\ I.~: ~;: ·1 I Ie I I I I 'I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS FOR CALLOWAY ACRES STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS February, 1984 TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS: 2" Type "DII HMAC on 411 of Type "A" HMAC (Total Pavement Thickness = 6 inches), on 8" of lime stabilized subgrade, with 6-inch curb and 24-inch gutter, and underground storm drainage on Scruggs, Parchman, and Cross Streets. Improvements extend from Grapevine Highway to Glenview Drive. ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATIONS 1. Based on estimated construction prices and quantities of construction by Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers, November 16, 1983. 2. Assessment Rates based on Resolution 79-28: For Non-Residential Zoning, Curb and Gutter Assessment Rate ;s 100~ of the cost of construction, and Paving and Storm Drainage Assessment is 40% of construction cost. 3. Appropriate credit is granted for existing curb and gutter depending on the amount.of repair and'realignment required. CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT RATES 6-inch Curb and 24-inch Gutter Estimated Unit Price = $5.00 Plus 10% for Contingencies = 0.50 TOTAL CURB AND GUTTER COST PER F.F. PAVING ASSESSMENT RATES = $5.50 DESCRIPTION OF ITEM ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST 4828.00 $5.00 $24140.00 12730.00 1.25 15912.50 254.00 75.00 19050.00 11826.00 0.25 2956.50 23652.00 0.05 1182.60 23652.00 2.60 61495.20 11826.00 2.60 30747.60 . . . . . . . . $155484.40 . . . . . 15548.44 . . . . . $171032.84 PAGE 1 UNIT Unclassified Street Excavation Stabilized Subgrade Lime for Stabilized Subgrade Prime Coat Tack Coat Type II A II HMAC., 2 II Cou rse Type liD" HMAC, 2'· Course C.Y. S.V. S.v. S.v. S.Y. S.Y. S.Y. TOTAL ASHPHAL PAVING CONSTRUCTION COST . Plus 10~ Contingencies TOTAL ASPHALT PAVING COSTS ...... ·1 I Ie I I I II I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS FOR CALLOWAY ACRES. continued. TOTAL PAVING FRONT FOOTAGE ON SCRUGGS = 2 X (STA. 17+81 - STA. 0+38) · = 2 X ( 1743 ) = 3486 F.F. TOTAL PAVING FRONT FOOTAGE ON PARCHMAN = 2 X (STA. 15+13 - 1+06) = 2 X ( 1407 ) = TOTAL PAVING FRONT FOOTAGE ON CROSS = 2 X (STA. 2+84 - 0+13) = 2 X ( 271 ) = GRAND TOTAL PAVING FRONT FOOTAGE IN THIS PROJECT 2814 F.F. 542 F.F. = 6.842 F.F. TOTAL PAVING COST PER FRONT FOOT = $ 171.032.84 / 6.842 F.F. = $ 25.00 PER F.F. TOTAL PAVING ASSESSMENT RATE PER FRONT FOOT = 0.40 X $ 25.00 = $ 10.00 PER F.F. DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT RATES ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST DESCRIPTION OF ITEM UNIT L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. EACH EACH L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. 1246.00 97.00 778.00 514.00 20.00 38.00 18.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 18" RCP 2111 RCP 2411 RCP 27" RCP 30" RCP 33" RCP 51 Curb Inlet 10' Curb Inlet Vault @ Scruggs Sta. 4+42 Vault @ Scruggs Sta. 9+40 Vault @ Scruggs Sta. 13+23.5 Vault @ Scruggs Sta. 13+61.54 Vault @ Parchman Sta. 10+56.93 TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . Plus 10% Contingencies ...... TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE COSTS ............ $23.00 24.00 26.00 29.00 35.00 43.00 1500.00 1800.00 2150.00 2400.00 3150.00 3300.00 2400.00 . . . . . . . . . . . GRAND TOTAL PAVING FRONT FOOTAGE IN THIS PROJECT . . . . . . $28658.00 2328.00 20228.00 14906.00 700.00 1634.00 27000.00 14400.00 2150.00 2400.00 3150.00 3300.00 2400.00 $123254.00 12325.40 $135579.40 = 6,842 F.F. TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE COST PER F.F. =" $ 135,579.40 / 6,842 F.F. = $ 19.82 PER F.F. TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT RATE PER F.F. = 0.40 X $ 19.82 = $ 7.93 PER F.F. FULL COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY TOTAL CURB AND GUTTER ASSESSMENT RATE TOTAL ASPHALT PAVING ASSESSMENT RATE TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT RATE GRAND TOTAL COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT RATE = $ 5.50 PER F.F. = $ 10.00 PER F.F. = $ 7.93 PER F.F. = $ 23.43 PER F.F. =========================== PAGE 2 ·1 I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS FOR CALLOWAY ACRES. continued. BASED ON THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ASSESSMENT POLICIES THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ASSESSMENT RATE REDUCTION FACTORS ARE APPLIED (SUBJECT TO" CITY COUNCIL MODIFICATION): CURB & ASPHAL STORM ZONING OR LAND USAGE GUTTER PAVING DRAINAGE Commercial (Front) 1.00 0.40 0.40 Commercial (Side) 1.00 0.30 0.30 Commercial (Rear) 1.00 0.20 0.20 Residential (Front) 0.60 0.25 0.25 Residential (Side) 0.40 0.17 0.17 Residential (Rear) 0.30 0.13 0.13 THE REDUCTION FACTORS TABULATED ABOVE ARE APPLIED TO THE FOLLOWING ESTIMATED UNIT CONSTRUCTION COSTS PER FRONT FOOT: CONSTRUCTION ITEM: CURB & GUTTER $5.50 ASPHALT PAVING $25.00 STORM DRAINAGE $19.82 ADJUSTED ASSESSMENT RATES BASED ON THE UNIT PRICES AND FACTORS TABULATED ABOVE: CURB & ASPHAL STORM TOTAL ASSM. ZONING OR LAND USAGE GUTTER PAVING" DRA rN'AGE RATEIF.F. Commercial (Front) 5.50 10.00 7.93 $23.43 Commercial (Side) 5.50 7.50 5.95 $18.95 Commercial (Rear) 5.50 5.00 3.96 $14.46 Residential (Front) 3.30 6.25 4.96 $14.51 Residential (Side) 2.20 4.25 3.37 $9.82 Residential (Rear) 1.65 3.25 2.58 $7.48 Note: See Assessment Roll Tabulation for Front Foot Rates applied to each property unit along Scruggs, Parchman. and Cross Streets. ·1 CALLOWAY ACRES STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel imi nary Ie ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 I UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * S C RUG G S D R I V E * * * II e West Side) 1. Sigmor Corp. Parker's Subdivision P.O. Box 20267 Lot lR less NPT I San Antonio, Tx. 78220 YOL. 6560, PG. 438 67.77 $23.43 $372.74 $1215.12 2. James M. Walkers, Inc. Parker's Subdivision I dba Walker Con st. Co. Lot NPT lR P.O. Box 18397 YOL. 7214, PG. 797 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 67.73 23.43 372.52 1214.40 I 3. Curtis L. Kemp A.G. Walker Surv., 707 Steger Abst. 1630, Tract 4L2 Duncanville, Tx. 75116 YOL. 5136, PG. 797 114.30 23.43 628.65 2049.40 Ie 4. A.W. Webb A.G., Walker Surv.~ 3803 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4AAl I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 2496, PG. 386 70.00 14.51 231.00 784.70 5. F.O. Buckingham A.G. Walker Surv., I 3805 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4AA2 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 3805, PG. 468 65.00 14.51 59.40 883.75 6. Lonnie Bearl Throop A.G. Walker Surv., I 3825 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4AA Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 3825, PG. 441 101.90 14.51 0.00 1478.57 I 7. Minnie Throop A.G. Walker Surv., 6833 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4Yl Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 1786, PG. 251 200.00 9.82 0.00 1964.00 I 8. Harvey E. Russell A.G. Walker Surv., 3921 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4T Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 1775, PG. 479 263.60 14.51 0.00 3824.84 I 9. Charles W. Smith A.G. Walker Surv., 4005 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4T1 I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 3965, PG. 617 87.00 14.51 59.40 1202.97 10. B.A. Nikirk A.G. Walker Surv., Ie 4013 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4S Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 1900, PG. 251 200.00 14.51 0.00 2902.00 I PAGE 1 OF 11 I CALLOWAY ACRES STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel imi nary Ie ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 I UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * S C RUG G S D R I V E * * * ( West Side) I 11. B.D. Hall. A.G. Walker Sur v., 6200 Abbott Abst. 1630, Tract 4Wl I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 6693, PG. 543 100.00 $23.43 $0.00 $2343.00 12. Walter B. Watkins A.G. Walker Surv., il 4021 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4W Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 2263, PG. 415 100.00 14.51 330.00 1121.00 13. William V. Hill A.G. Walker Surv., I 4027 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4Nl Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 2912, PG. 529 73.00 14.51 0.00 1059.23 Ie 14. R.L. Fortenberry A.G. Walker Sur v., 4037 Scruggs Abst. 1630, Tract 4N Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 1674, PG. 18 128.50 14.51 0.00 1864.54 I * * * S C RUG G S D R I V E * * * ( East Side ) I 15. Paul C. Mason Calloway Acres Addn. 6900 Grapevine H~. Lot S 226.3 W 125.0 1 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 4092, PG. 215 226.30 23.43 0.00 5302.21 I 16. James L. Fleming Calloway Acres Addn. 3800 Scruggs N 36.0 W 125.0 1 I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 S 54.0 W 125.0 2 VOL. 3303, PG. 253 90.00 14.51 297.00 1008.90 17. Gail Douglas Calloway'Acres Addn. I 3804 Scruggs Lot N 90.0 W 125.0 2 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 4485, PG. 46 90.00 14.51 297.00 1008.90 I 18. Gail Douglas Calloway Acres Addn. 3804 Scruggs Lot 3K Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 4485, PG. 46 94.00 23.43 517.00 1685.42 I 19. Gail Douglas Calloway Acres Addn. 3804 Scruggs Lot 4K Ie Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 4485, PG. 46 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 I PAGE 2 OF 11 I CALLOWAY ACRES STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Clty of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel imi nary f ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 I PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. UNIT PROPERTY OWNER I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * S C RUG G S D R I Y E * * * ( East Side ) I 20. R.H. Assemb. of God Calloway Acres Addn. P.O. Box 13352 Lot 5K I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 3166, PG. 73 80.00 $23.43 $440.00 $1434.40 21. R.H. Assemb. of God Calloway Acres Addn. I P.O. Box 13352 Lot 6K Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 3209, PG. 58 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 22. R.H. Assemb. of God Calloway Acres Addn. I P.O. Box 13352 Lot 7K Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 3519, PG. 308 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 Ie 23. Turner M. Gauntt, Jr. Calloway Acres Addn. 1306 W." Euless Blvd. Lot 8K Euless, Tx. 76039 YOL. 5453, PG. 942 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 I 24. Turner M. Gauntt, Jr. Calloway Acres Addn. 1306 W. Euless Blvd. Lot 9K Euless, Tx. 76039 YOL. 5453, PG. 942 80 . 00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 I 25. Turner M. Gauntt, Jr. Calloway Acres Addn. 1306 W. Euless Blvd. Lot lOK I Euless, Tx. 76039 YOL. 5453, PG. 942 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 26. Turner M. Gauntt, Jr. Calloway Acres Addn. I 1306 W. Euless Blvd. Lot IlK Euless, Tx. 76039 YOL. 5453, PG. 942 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 27. Turner M. Gauntt, Jr. Calloway"Acres Addn. I 1306 W. Euless Blvd. Lot I2K Eul ess, Tx. -76039 YOL. 5453, PG. 942 80 . 00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 I 28. Thomas D. Nelson & Calloway Acres Addn. Dean F. Nelson Lot G-1 4001 Yance Road' YOL. 6277, PG. 467 I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 75.00 18.95 0.00 1421.25 29. N.R.H. Baptist Church Calloway Acres Addn. Ie 4001 Vance Road Lot F Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 6829, PG. 102 75.00 23.43 0.00 1757.25 I PAGE 3 OF 11 I CALLOWAY ACRES' STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel imi nary f ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 I UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * S C RUG G S D R I V E * * * ( East Side) I 30. N.R.H. Baptist Church Calloway Acres Addn. 4001 Vance Road Lot E I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 6800, PG. 99 75.00 $23.43 $0.00 $1757.25 31. N.R.H. Baptist Church Calloway Acres Addn. I 4001 Vance Road Lot D Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 7136, PG. 1554 63.00 23.43 0.00 1476.09 32. William F. Hall Calloway Acres Addn. II 6912 Glenview Dr. lot A Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 . VOL. 2887, PG. 450 131.70 18.95 724.35 1771.37 Ie * * * PAR C H MAN D R I V E * * * ( West Side ) I 33. Alfred A. St. Arnold Calloway Acres Addn. 6913 Grapevine H~. Lot l-R Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 388-156. PG. 55 105.00 23.43 577.50 1882.65 I 34. L.t. Urbanovsky Calloway Acres Addn. ' 220 Fanning St. Lot E 139.5 N 75 2 Hurst. Tx. 76053 Less E 14.5- I VOL. 5646, PG. 459 75.00 23.43 0.00 1757.25 35. N.E. Chap. Assb. of God Calloway Acres Addn. I 5640 E. Belknap St. Lot 22K Ft. Worth. Tx. 76117 VOL. 6371, PG. 169 94.00 23.43 517.00 1685.42 36. N.E. Chap. Assb. of God Calloway· Acres Addn. I 5640 E. Belknap St. Lot 21K Ft. Worth, Tx. 76117 YOL. 6371, PG. 169 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 I 37. N.E. Chap. Assb. of God Calloway Acres Addn. 5640 E. Belknap St. lot 20K Ft. Worth, Tx. 76117 VOL. 6371, PG. 169 80 .00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 I 38. R.H. Assemb. of God Calloway Acres Addn. P.O. Box 13352 Lot 19K Ie Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 3209, PG. 58 80 . 00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 I PAGE 4 OF 11 I CALLOWAY ACRES' STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel iminary f ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 I UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. I NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * PAR C H MAN D R I V E * * * ( West Side ) I 39. R.H. Assemb. of God Calloway Acres Addn. P.O. Box 13352 Lot 18K I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 3209, PG. 58 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 40. Jerry Marlin Vaughan Calloway Acres Addn. I 3917 Parchman lot 17K Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 6528, PG. 971 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 41. La rry G. Wood Calloway Acres Addn. I 1330 Summit Lot 16K Ft. Worth, Tx. 76102 YOL. 7086, PG. 1657 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 Ie 42. Jerry R. Trimble Calloway Acres Addn. 3925 Pa"rchman Lot 15K Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 5442, PG. 831 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 I 43. Jehovah's Witness Riehl. Calloway Acres Addn. United Kingdom Hall Lot 14K 6900 Cross St. YOL. 4977, PG. 418 I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 80.00 23.43 440.00 1434.40 44. Jehovah's Witness Riehl. Calloway Acres Addn. I United Kingdom Hall Lot 13K 6900 Cross St. VOL. 3931, PG. 250 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 80.00 23.43 0.00 1874.40 I 45. N.R.H. Baptist Church Calloway Acres Addn. 4001 Yance Road Lot G-2 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 6277, PG. 467 75.00 $23.43 $412.50 $1344.75 I 46. H.R.H. Baptist Church Calloway Acres Addn. 4001 Vance Road Lot F I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 6829, PG. 102 75.00 23.43 412.50 1344.75 47. N.R.H. Baptist Church Calloway Acres Addn. I 4001 Vance Road Lot E Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 6800, PG. 99 75.00 23.43 412.50 1344.75 Ie I PAGE 5 OF 11 I CALLOWAY ACRES' STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel im; nary f ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 I UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. I * * * PAR C H MAN D R I V E * * * ( West Side ) I 48. N.R.H. Baptist Church Calloway Acres Addn. 4001 Vance Road Lot D I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 7136, PG. 1554 63.00 $23.43 $346.50 $1129.59 49. N.R.H. Baptist Church Calloway Acres Addn. 4001 Vance Road Lot C I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 7199, PG. 763 131.70 23.43 724.35 2361.38 * * * PAR C H MAN D R I V E * * * I ( East Side ) 50. William D. Parks Parchman Addition Ie Rt. 1, Box 141 Lot A-I Burleson, Tx. 76028 VOL. 7557, PG. 1756 261.06 23.43 1435.83 4680.81 51. Pioneer Oil Co. Parchman Addition I 6955 Grapevine Hwy. Lot A-2 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 388-123, PG. 75 8.54 23.43 46.97 153.12 I 52. Ron lusk, Trustee Parchman Addition 7001 Grapevine H~., Lot 17 Suite 434 VOL. 7047, PG. 335 I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 417.20 23.43 2294.60 7480.40 53. N.R.H. Baptist Church Parchman Addition 4001 Vance Road lot 16 I Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 7055, PG. 254 75.00 23.43 412.50 1344.75 54. N.R.H. Baptist Church Parchman "Addition I 4001 Vance Road Lot 15 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 7047, PG. 329 75.00 23.43 412.50 1344.75 'I 55. N.R.H. Baptist Church Parchman Addition 4001 Vance Road Lot 14 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 VOL. 4501, PG. 658 75.00 23.43 412.50 1344.75 I 56. N.R.H. Baptist Church Parchman Addition 4001 Vance Road Lot 13 1_ Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 YOL. 3297, PG. 187 75.00 23.43 412.50 1344.75 PAGE 6 OF 11 I II I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I 1 I I I Ie I CALLOWAY ACRES' STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas UNIT NO. PROPERTY OWNER AND ADDRESS Prel imi nary ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February, 1984 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * PAR C H MAN D R I V E * * * ( East Side) 57. N.R.H. Baptist Church 4001 Vance Road Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 58. H.R.H. Baptist Church 4001 Vance Road Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 59. N.R.H. Baptist Church 4001 Vance Road Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 60. N.R.H. Baptist Church 4001 Vance Road Ft. Worth', Tx. 76118 61. Thomas D. Nelson & Dean F. Nelson 4001 Vance Road Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 62. N.R.H. Baptist Church 4001 Vance Road Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 63. Turner M. Gauntt, Jr. 1306 W. Euless Blvd. Euless, Tx. 76039 Parchman Addition Lot 12 VOL. 3388, PG. 280 75.00 23.43 412.50 1344.75 Parchman Addition Lot 11 VOL. 3991, PG. 621 75.00 23.43 412.50 1344.75 Parchman Addition Lot 10 YOL. 3991, PG. 621 75.10 23.43 413.05 1346.54 A.G. Walker Surv. Abst. 1630, Tr. 4Al VOL. 3968, PG. 564 207.4023.43 1140'.70 3-718.68 * * * C R 0 S S S T R E E T * * * ( North Side ) Calloway Acres Addn. Lot G-l YOL. 6277, PG. 467 125.00 23.43 Calloway Acres Addn. Lot G-2 VOL. 6277, PG. 467 125.00 $23.43 * * * C R O'S S S T R E E T * * * ( South Side ) Cal1ow~ Acres Addn. Lot 12K YOL. 5453, PG. 942 125.00 23.43 64. Jehovah's Witness Riehl. Calloway Acres Addn. United Kingdom Hall Lot 13K 6900 Cross St. YOL. 3931. PG. 250 Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 G RAN 0 TOT A L S 125.00 23.43 6611.80 0.00 2928.75 $0.00 $2928.75 687.50 2241.25 0.00 2928.75 23265.55 116681~43 PAGE 7 OF 11 I CALLOWAY ACRES' STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas 1 Prel im; nary Ie * * * * * ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L 5 U M MAR Y * * * * * February. 1984 * * * * CALCULATION OF APPARENT CREDITS * * * * I UNIT PROPERTY OWNER CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT APPARENT TYPE NO. DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS USE I 1.0 Sigmor Corp. Exist. C & G 67.77 $5.50 $372.74 CF 2.0 James M. Walkers Exist. C & G 67.73 5.50 372.52 CF I 3.0 Curtis L. Kemp Exist. C & G 114.30 5.50 628.65 CF 4.0 A. W. Webb, Exist. C & G 70.00 3.30 231.00 RF 5.0 F.D. Buckingham Exist. Cone. Drive. 18.00 3.30 59.40 RF I 9.0 Charles W. Smith Exist. Cone. Drive. 18.00 3.30 59.40 RF 12.0 Walter B. Watkins Exist. C & G 100.00 3.30 330.00 RF 16.0 James L. Flemming Exist. C & G 90.00 3.30 297.00 RF 17.0 Gail Douglas Exist. C & G 90.00 3.30 297.00 RF I 18.0 Gail Douglas Exist. C & G 94.00 5.50 517.00 CF 19.0 Gail Douglas Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 20.0 R.H. Ass. God Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF I 21.0 R.H. Ass. God Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 22.0 R.H. Ass. God Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 23.0 Turner M. Gauntt Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF Ie 24.0 Turner M. Gauntt Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 25.0 Turner- M. Gauntt Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 26.0 Turner M. Gauntt Exist. C'& G" 80~OO 5~50' 440.00 CF 27.0 Turner M. Gauntt Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF I 32.0 William F. Hall Exist. C & G 131.70 5.50 724.35 CF 33.0 Alfred A. St. Arnold Exist. C & G 105.00 5.50 577.50 CF 35.0 N.E. Assem. God Exist. C & G 94.00 5.50 517.00 CF I 36.0 N.E. Assem. God Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 37.0 N.E. Assem. God Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 38.0 R.H. Ass. God Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF I 39.0 R.H. Ass. God Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 40.0 Jerry Marlin Vaughan Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 41.0 La rry W. Wood Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 42.0 Jerry R. Trimble Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF I 43.0 Jeh. Witness Rich. Exist. C & G 80.00 5.50 440.00 CF 45.0 N.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 75.00 5.50 412.50 CF 46.0 H.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 75.00 5.50 412.50 CF I 47.0 N.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 75.00 5.50 412.50 CF 48.0 N.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 63.00 5.50 346.50 CF 49.0 N.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 131.70 5.50 724.35 CF I 50.0 William D. Parks Exist. C & G 261.06 5.50 1435.83 CF 51.0 Pioneer Oil Co. Exist. C & G 8.54 5.50 46.97 CF 52.0 Ron Lusk Exist. C & G 417.20 5.50 2294.60 CF 53.0 N.R.H. Bapt. th. Exist. C & G 75.00 5.50 412.50 CF I 54.0 H.R.H. Bapt. th. Exist. C & G 75.00 5.50 412.50 CF 55.0 N.R.H. Bapt. th. Exist. C & G 75.00 5.50 412.50 CF 56.0 N.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 75.00 5.50 412.50 CF Ie 57.0 N.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 75.00 5.50 412.50 CF I PAGE 8 OF 11 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~I CALLOWAY ACRES· STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Pre' imi nary * * * * * ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L SUM MAR Y * * * * * February. 1984 * * * * CALCULATION OF APPARENT CREDITS * * * * UNIT PROPERTY OWNER CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT APPARENT TYPE NO. DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS USE 58.00 N.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 75.00 5.50 $412.50 CF 59.00 N.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 75.10 5.50 413.05 CF 60.00 N.R.H. Bapt. Ch. Exist. C & G 207.40 5.50 1140.70 CF 63.00 Turner M.. Gauntt Exist. Cone. Drive 125.00 5.50 687 . 50 CF PAGE 9 OF 11 I CALLOWAY ACRES STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas I Prel imi nary Ie * * * * * ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L SUM MAR Y * * * ,* * February, 1984 I TOTAL (AVG. ) TOTAl.. TOTAl UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. I A. Sigmor Corp. Unit No. 1 67.77 $17.93 $372.74 $1215.12 I B. James M. Walker 2 67.73 17.93 372.52 1214.40 c. Curtis L. Kemp 3 114.30 17.93 628.65 2049.40 I D. A.W. Webb 4 70.00 11.21 231.00 784.70 E. F.O. Buckingham 5 65.00 13.60 59.40 883.75 I F. Lonnie Bearl Throop 6 101.90 14.51 0.00 1478.57 I G. Minnie Throop 7 200.00 9.82 0.00 1964.00 H. Harvey E. Russell 8 263.60 14.51 0.00 3824.84 Ie I . Charles·W. Smith 9 87.00 13.83 59.40 1202.97 J. B . A . N i k i rlc 10 200.00 14.51 0.00 2902.00 I K. B.D. Hall 11 100.00 23.43 0.00 2343.00 I L. Walter B. Watkins 12 100.00 11.21 330.00 1121.00 M. William V. Hill 13 73.00 14.51 0.00 1059.23 I N. R.L. Fortenberry 14 128.50 14.51 0.00 1864.54 o. Paul C. Mason 15 226.30 23.43 0.00 5302.21 I P. James L. Flemming 16 90.00 11.21 297.00 1008.90 I Q. Gail Douglas 17, 18, 19 264 .00 15.64 1254.00 4128.72 R. R.H. Assemb. God 20, 21, 22, 38, 39 400.00 17.93 2200.00 7172.00 I s. Turner M. Gauntt, Jr. 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 63 525.00 17.93 2887.50 9413.25 T. T.D. & D.F. Nelson 28, 61 200.00 21.75 0.00 4350.00 I u. N.R.H. Baptist Church 29, 30, 31, 45, 46, 47, 1490.20 19.18 6337.10 28578.29 1_ 48, 49, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62 I PAGE 10 OF 11 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie :1 CALLOWAY ACRES STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Prel imi nary * * * * * ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L SUM MAR Y * * * * * J=ebruary, 1984 TOTAL (AVG. ) TOTAL TOTAL UNIT PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. NO. AND ADDRESS DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. v. William F. Hall 32 131.70 13.45 724.35 1771.37 w. Alfred A. St. Arnold 33 105.00 17.93 577.50 1882.65 x. L.C. Urbanovsky 34 75.00 23.43 0.00 1757.25 Y. N.E. Chap. Assb. God 35, 36, 37 254.00 17.93 1397.00 4554.22 z. Jerry Marlin Vaughan 40 80 . 00 17.93 440.00 1434.40 AA. Larry W. Wood 41 80.00 17.93 440.00 1434.40 BB. Jerry R. Trimble 42 80.00 17.93 440.00 1434.40 CC. Jehovah's Witness Richl. 43, 44, 64 285.00 21.89 440.00 6237.55 DD. William D. Parks 50 261.06 17.93 1435.83 4680.81 EE. Pioneer Oil Co. 51 8.54 17.93 46.97 153.12 FF. Ron Lusk, Trustee 52 417.20 17.93 2294.60 7480.40 TOT A L S : 6611.80 17.65 23265.55 116681.43 Total Estimated Construction Cost: $600000.00 Total Estimated Assessments: 19~ 116681.43 ...---..~----- ~--------- Total Estimated Const. Cost Less Assessments: $483318.57 PAGE 11 OF 11 I I Ie I I I I I' I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . , ----_.~----- --- ---- E<r~. ~~v.:l.~.:.E~~~~FlOWERS.INC. ENG I NEER S EST I MA TE'.~·-! · . 'O~ Ci~~~; NOl"th Richl and Hill 5 JOB NO. 3-330 OA TE: 6-24-83, C " A 1983 S t t & D· lot 5 ~ffiJECT DESCRIPTIOH~ a oway cres - ree ra1nage mpr vemen ""'- iTEM TOTAL UNIT . DESCRIPTION OF ITEM HO. UN IT ,QUANT I TY PRtCE COST PAVING IMPROVEMENTS: Unclassified Street Excavat10n 1 C. Y . .~.828 5.00 $ 24. 140. 00 RelTlove Ex;st,ng Curb & Gutter 2 L.F. ~.251 ·'1.00 lj,UU4.0D Remove Existing S,dewalks, Drwys., Valleys. t ntnpr" rnnt'" F='l ~ 1"wn,..1l 3 S F 15.153 0.60 9 091.80 ";;\y- ., 4 L.F. 1.655 1.10 1 820 . 50 ~t~hi,;.,prf II'> n I,. WIt ;me S1 u rrv (8" Thick) 5 S.Y. 12.730 1.25 15 912.50 , ; mp J: n,.. c: t ~ h ,. 6 TON 254 75.00 19050.00 Mr_~n nr" FA-HVM~ Prime Coat W/Sand 7 S.Y. 11 . 826 0.25 2.956.50 Rr:-? nr F'A-HVRS Ac:;nhalt Tack Coat 8 S.Y. 23.652 0.05 1.182.60 Tvop tI ~ It H~\AC 2" Thic k 9 S. Y . 23,652 2.60 61,495.20 fV02 II )" HMAC 2" Thick 10 S.Y. 11,826 2.60 30,747.60 T VD Þ " )11 For Transitions & Misc. Uses 11 TON 138 30.00 4,140.00 611 Cu r ") & 2411 Gutter 12 t. ~. 7 ,483 5.00 37,415.00 4" Thick C1. UB" 2000 PSI Cone. for Median & ,-1 ; ~c Uses" I ncl. Steel 13 S.F. 130 3.00 390. 5" Thick Cone. for OWYs. Incl. Reinf. Steel 14 S.F. 11,430 3.00 34,290. 6" Thick'":aConc for Valley Gutter, Incl. Steel 15 S.F. 1.764 3.00 5,292. ) 4" Thirk Cone: Sidpwa'k~ Incl a Steel 16 S.F. 3 , 329 2.00 6.658. ) C;TnRM ORA N -CONSTt :U(TION· rf~ D,a. Cl. I I I RCP, Incl. Excav., Emb. & Bkfl. 17 L.F. 1.246 23.00 28 t 6 S-S-.-olY ,- -'", Di a . C1 .. I 1 I RCP Incl. Exc!v." Emb. !. Bkfl.. 18. L.F. gl· 24.QO,. Z..3lH..Oo. . 24" Oia ' C1 a I I I RCP.. Ine1. Excav. Emb. & Bkfl. 19 L.F. 778 26.00 20,228.00 ?711 nii4 rl tTT Rrp Tnr1 -=-):~av Fmh " Bkfl I?O L F 514 29..00 14.906.00 30" OiB. Cl I-I I J RCP lnel. Excav.. Emb. & Bkfl. 21 l.F. 20 35.00 700.00 ,3 3 II Di a . Cl. I I I ) RCP. Incl. Excav.. Emb. & Bkfl. 22 l.F. 38 43.00 -1,634.UU ":ChI! n;~ rl T T T \ Rrp Tnrl Fxr~v Emb P, Bkf1 23 l . F 547 46.00 25.162.00 · 5' 'Std. Cast-;n-Place Curb Inlet 24 EACH , 18 1500.00 27,000.00 , 0 I S td Cast-;n-Place Curb Inlet 25 EACH 8 1800.00 14.400.00 V~tJlt 'fa ,. \JIÜ~ Sta 4+4? 26 l.S. : 1 2150.00 2.150.00 Va tJ 1 t ta ~c r U Q 0 S S t a 9+40 27 L.S. 1 2400.00 2.400.00 V~u't @ ScruQQs Sta. 13+23.5 28 L.S. 1 3150.00 3,150.00 'Vault @ ScruQQs Stat 13+61.50 29 L.S. 1 3300.00 3,300.00 · V~u't (è Parchman Sta. 10+56.93 30 L.S. 1 2400.00 2.400.W WATER UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS: , ?" rl t;n n T P 31 l F. 223 35.00 7..805.00 ,'11 ~i\tp Vñ1vp ~ Box 32 EACH 4 1500.00 ,6.000.00 n T P Fittinos 33 TON 3.95 3000.00 11.850.00 611 DR 18 PVC Wa ter Pi De 34 L.F. 3 , 318 15.00 49.770.00· 6" Gate Valve & Box 35 EACH 5 350.00 1.750.00 ?" nR 1 R PVC Wa ter Pi De 36 L.F. 2S 20.00· 500.00 2ft Gate Valve & Box ,37 EACH '1 200.00 200.00 '-F\xf\T~;tnn;no ~'~ve & 6" TaoD;no Va1ve W/Box 38- EACH 2 900.00 1 800.00 ~~~~~ate Ex;stina :ire Hvdrant 39 EACH 1 500.00 500.00 4. .___... ____ -- .--..-... I I I'" I I I I I I Ie I I I ·1 I I I Ie I .-------- .-... ------. ~- "7 ,-- 0_________ 0\... r &.7CN-èl'CUXi-rL~·vvi.,~,.aN:. :- . 'j'" -:~-'-:-. '" .. '--...- ~~ /~R: City 'of, North Richland Hn 15 , , ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE "-) JOB' NO. 3- 330 6- 24-83 DA TE: . ' /" ECt. OESCR I PT ION: Ca oway Acres 1983 - Street & Dra nage Improvements r , ITEM TOTAL UN IT DESCRIPTION OF ITEM HO. UNIT' ,QUANT I TV PR IC E COST WATER UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS CONTID. Rmv. Exist. Stm.' Dra;n in Drwv. @ Sta. 7+86 (Pa rchman) 40 l.S. 1 15{)U-. mr 1,500.00 Short SinQle Wtr. Se r'I . line Replacement 41 EACH 10 16-0-. DO- 1,600.00' Lono <\inolp Wt,. S p t""V Line Reolacement 42 EACH 10 220.00 2 200.00 Ad; S S MH & Stonn Dra;n MH to Fin. Grade 43 EACH 9 250.00 2,250.00 Ad,; Wtr. Va' ve Boxes & 5S Cl eanout to Fin. Grade 44 EACH 12 125.00. 1,500.00 AC\nh~'t p Jfpo-' ð~pmpnt 4S S.F. 855 4.00 3.420.00 " - . - - - 0 - - -. -- -- - , -- -.J -, - I - - - - .- -. _. -.-.- - .-- - , . .. - -_. . - - , ~ ,- . ,- ~~:5 ' . . - ,- - - -, - 0 -, - - - ¡....:~:::==. . - - - - R.tz;~~_:V;:~ SUB-TOTAL COHSTRUCT10H CO S r- ..: -..=- -~ -:.. -1S-08.646.10 ·~LÞ?E. PLus;nQi neeri nQ & ContinQencies 91"',353.30 . -. PROJ.ECT ~tUGER ____.___ ..$6. qo, OQ9 !ºO -------. .~ .--- -- - --- .... ----~...._.. -. --. - --- - . --- TOTAL ESTJ MATED ,CO$J__ · I I .JECT :. I, DATE: 2-22-84 ., ,~' ...., 1,1, -.::>. Snow Heights Streec and Drainage Improvements Pa . I drainage improvements and also Wendell Drive street improvements. ., I J j DEPARTMENT: Publi~ ~orks II BACKGRO~: . This is, final payment to Austin Road for the Snow Hei~hts street and II~ I I I· I I_ I I I CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approve/disap¡>rove payment to Austin Road ,Co., in the amount of $67,084.32. I I I I Ie I BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO :::::::_~~-~~~::::_::::~-------------------~--------------------------- I. I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,~ ... ".. t:, f. tJ t;; KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas February 21, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-326, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SNOW HEIGHTS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 12, FINAL Enclosed ;s one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 12, and Final, dated February IS, 1984, made payable to Austin Road Company, in the amount of $67,084.32, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 31, 1984. This project includes curb and gutter, asphalt pavement and utility line reconstruction on the following streets: Holiday Lane, Vance Road, Victoria Drive and Briley Drive. In addition, change orders have been added for water system improvements on lariat Trail and Briley, and paving improvements on Wendel" Drive. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. All additions and changes to this contract are noted on the attached "Construction Project Status Report" which accounts for differences in the original estimated quantities and actual as-built quantities. We recommend .that this final payment, in amount of $67,084.32, be made to Austin Road Company at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. In accordance with Section 3.2.11(a) of the Contract, the two (2) year term of maintenance will begin on this date, and therefore, will terminate on February IS, 1986. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, fire hydrants, and other equipment furnished and installed under this Contract along with sewer line breaks or stoppage. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures. (See p. 3.2.5) We will be present at the February 27 Council Meeting to answer any questions F~bruary 21, 1984 Snow Heights S. & D. Page 1 !5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I. I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I ,. t#' ~ FINAL CONTRACTOR IS ESTIMATE, continued. you may have concerning this project. ~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager 7Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road Company F~bruary 21, 1984 Snow Heights S. & D. Page 2 I I _BJECT~ I, · DATE: 2-22-84 ;;:) l ~,..'-t Denton Highway Water System Extensions Pay Estimate #1 I DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: I .. I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Uti1~ty. This contractor is about halfway complete with this waterline on Denton Highway at this time. However the payment is for about a·third .of.the job less the retainage. . . CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Anprove/disaDprove Dayment to Panhandle Construction Co.. in the amount of $ 89.028.70. . BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: ~~ . ~~-~------~--~--~-~~---~--~-~--- ---~-~-----~~-~-~~--------~--~~-~-------~-~~--~-~---~-~ Revenue Bonds ". ,t. 'II ~. I I_ I I I I I I 1"_ I I I I I I I I_ I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas _ February 6. 1984 Honorable ~or and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-546, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DENTON HWY WATER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.1 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 1 dated Janu~ry 31, 1984, made payable to Panhandle Construction Co., in the amount of $89,028.70 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 25, 1984. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site .by your representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the estimaœ, and."' we' trave"-cnecked'the f'tem extensions a~d addftf'ons. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $89,028.70, be made to Panhandle Construction Co.,· P.O. Box, Lubbock, Texas 79408. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month IS estimate. ' We will be present at the February 13 Council Meeting to answer any' questions you may have concerning this project. _ ~ RWA/llg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager ~Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Scott Jenogan, City Inspector Panhandle Construction Company _ SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I Ie 'I I I I I Ie I 1 I I I ~I I 'Ie I DATE: February 27,1984 ;Þ) ;Þ c~~ SUBJECT: Hot Mix Asphalt DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: On February 13,1984 at 10:00 A.M. bids were opened on the above mentioned item and the results are outlined below. (6 Bid specifications were mailed and 4 returned.) VENDOR Southern Asphalt SRO Asphalt A-Pac - Texas Inc. Austin Road EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT No Bid $20.50 Ton $20.50 Ton $19.15 Ton o o o The above material will be used to repair and retop City streets. All bids are based on availability and current oil prices. Recommendation: The City of North Richland Hills contract with Austin Road at $19.15 per ton, and in addition be allowed to buy on the spot market at the best price and availability, in an amount not to exceed $227,310. The approximate useage for one year is 12,000 tons. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove the purchase of asphalt from Austin Road-and the above recommendation. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO 01-60-04-3080 /1 "-- I I )\L. ~\~ 1:. of t hc- ·MerropJex CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS INDOR.S NAME AND ADDRESS INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: "'" I Request For: Asphaltic Concrete Bid Opening Date: February 13, 1984 At 10:00 A.M. .--"q.t I ~ DESCRIPTION ~ 7;;~ D ~t ,I/,'r ~;lIfl'c. lT~{r~-k I' , j I .Jê I ,I Date: Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 A.M. February City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richl.nd Hills, Tex. 76118 ATTN: Ci t' Secretary Phone: 281-0041 QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE 15,000 Tons ~9 ~..;- 13,1984 TOTAL ?~7 .....,~~ tr- , ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. I Net /ð7l, tlf,-,""fl, MS " DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH HLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas· I' ~ reserves the right to reject any or aU bids. waive formal.· t ~ award purchases on an individual item basis when in its interests. All SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-, ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF IRTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. SUB-TOT AL TOTAL BID - IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID. VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE Of ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR· CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI· TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY COMPANY: AUSTIN ROAD BY: PHONE NUMBER· SIGNATUR THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and a~rees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and" free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud,' the proposals will be tabulated' for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise i~ the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. ~ I 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of 'form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the 'City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminen~; in the sole opinion of said City. I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie 7. I I I I I I ,I Ie I 5. DtSQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reaso~s, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. ' (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent. in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, e~c. (f) Uncompleted work which in thè judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or ~inder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. ""~ 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibiliti~s of the low bidders. ASSIGNMENT The suècessful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mañager! Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) I / I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (8) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such produ.cts are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal'" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASE 1. Delivery shall be to the location identified on the purchase order within the City of North Richland Hills. 2. The contract will be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications at the price bid. 3. In the event of partial shipments or multiple deliveries, the quantities shown on the bid are estimated quantities only. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to purchase more than or less than the quantities shown. In any event, the unit bid prices shall govern. 4. Bidder warrants that all deliveries made under the contract will be of the type and quality specified; and the City of North Richland Hills Purchasing Agent may reject and/or refuse any delivery which falls below the quality specified in the specifications. The City of North Richland Hills shall not be held to have accepted any delivery until after an inspection of same has been made and an opportunity to exercise its right of rejection has been afforded. 5. All manufacturers' warranties shall inure to the benefit of the City of North Richland Hills, and replacement of" defective materials shall be made promptly upon request. 6. Failure by the contractor to make reasonable delivery as and when requested shall entitle the Purchasing Agent to acquire quantities from alternate sources wherever available, with the right to seek reimbursement from the contractor for amounts, if any, paid by the City of North Richland Hills over and above the bid price. 7. All materials delivered shall be free of any and all liens and shall upon acceptance thereof become the property of the City of North Richland Hills free and clear of any materialman's. supplier's, or ot~er type liens. 8. Regardless of the award of a contract hereunder, the City of North Richland Hills retains the right to purchase the same or similar materials or items from other sources should it be determined that doing so would be in the City's best interest. based on cost and quality considerations; however. in such event, the contractor will be given ~he first option of meeting or rejecting the proposed alternate source's lower price or higher quality. 9. Acceptance by the City of North Richland Hills of any delivery shall not relieve the contractor of any guarantee or warranty, express or implied, nor shall it be considered an acceptance of material not in accordance with the specifications thereby waiving the City's right to request replacement of defective material. I ,I / 'I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CONTRACT FOR ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS Each bidder must fill in all information called for in the blanks provided beside each item. Failure to do so or to fully describe the supplies being bid could result in rejection of the bid. An "X" should be placed in the appropriate space when the supplies offered meets or exceeds the City's specifications. Exceptions which cannot be avoided should be fully described in the appropriate blanks beside each item or on a separate page. Exceptions to the requirements listed below should be avoided, and bidders should make every effort to offer no less than the features, standards and quality levels described which are the minimum requirements. GENERAL This contract shall be for the period of 12 months , or until such time as contract amount is reached, for the supplying of :)lant delivered asphaltic concrete on an as needed basis for the City of N:,rth Richland Hills in accordance with the following requirements. I. CONVEYANCE A. All conveyance from the plant to the City of North Richland Hills shall be by others and is excluded from this contract. II. DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS A. All asphaltic concrete supplied under this contract shall comply with Standard Texas State Highway Department Specification No. 340, Type D. III. gUANTITIES A. It is estimated that the total volume of this contract will be approximately 151000 ton~. However, the City of North Richland"Hills reserves the right to adjust this volume to meet the City's actual requirements. All asphaltic concrete shall be supplied and paid for based on actual quantities of each individual order. CHECK INDICATING COMPLIANCE OR DESCRIBE AS APPROPRIATE V'- 1,,/ v I / 'I I" I I I I I I I" I I I I I I I I" I B. Except as otherwise agreed, all asphaltic concrete shall be supplied during normal plant runs of this type of asphaltic concrete. IV. SPECIAL BID CONSIDERATION A. It should be noted that hauling distance represents a considerable factor in determining ultimate costs of plant delivered asphaltic concrete. As such, each Bidder ~hould be aware that bid evaluation will include consideration for the hauling distance, and realized costs attendant thereto~ Low bid, in this instance, shall be computed on the basis of ultimate on-site costs. v. ADJUSTMENTS FOR ESCALATION/DE ESCALATION A. An adjustment clause is hereby made a part of this contract to grant equitable relief from currently unpredicatable petroleum by-product prices. This adjustment will be allowed after the Supplier has submitted in writing to the Purchasing Agent, proof of change - either increase or decrease - in excess of 20% of crude oil prices established at the bid date. Additional adjustments, if any, will be in like increments of 20% of the established base rate. As the basis for this adjustment, Bidder's crude oil cost. at time of bid, is ~~ v v ,t:¡" I'~ t" ¡'.J ~'Y' J+1 fAl17,'/ ~. lJJ'/'fS I 'I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I 1 TO: THE CITY SECRETARY. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. P. O. BOX 18609, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118. The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills. on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal. the general conditions. and the specifications. and other conditions attached hereto the following: CONTRACT FOR ASPHALTIC CONCRETE. In making this offer. the independent vendor, agrees to sell the products set forth at the following prices hereby bid: CONTRACT FOR ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PER SPECIFICATION. ITEM 1. Contract for Asphaltic Concrete. meeting Texas Highway Department No. 340, Type D per City of North Richland Hills specifications ;¥ ¿..~ ~ 'J ~~_.~" c¿ /J Cost for /:,>.~() Tons ~ /9, I·~- Unit Cost Terms: .A4-f % / oil, PIn'"' Hy&. All prices quoted will be F.O.B. plant locations. I 'I Ie I I I I I I Ie I 'I I I I I I Ie 1- The undersigned, in submittin& this bid, represents that he is an equal opportunity employer and will not discriminate with regard to ra~e, religion, color, nati9nal origin, age, and sex in the performance of this contract. SUBMI TTED BY: AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY (Firm Name) . ~ ~ .-----.. By: . ( , . .u.'t' ~__ _ ___>... (Ti tIe) l --'-. . ertram Vice Pres. Address: P. O. ßo~ 2285 FoRT WORTH. TEXAS 76} J 3 Phone: Ce/~ 33~ - e3 73 TO BE COMPLETED BY BIDDER 1. Is company a corporation, partnership, or sole proprietorship? G'f\~IJY"Q-f,,~ , 2. Full legal name. of company or corporation: ~V571V lé?ðR,j) C'OJ«P¡tJII/Y 3. If a corporation, what is its state of incorporation? ~~)1~ I I . Ie I I I I I -I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . DATE: Februarv 27.1984 Page 1 S~ SUBJECT: Motor Fuels Public Works DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: On February 13,1984 at 10:00 A.M. bids were opened on motor fuels and are outlined below. ( 7 Bid specifications were mailed and 4 returned ) VENDOR EXCEPTIONS o AMOUNT Regular . .86 Unleaded ' .94 Diesel 112 .95 Regular .8160 Unleaded .8470 Diesel 112 .9150 Regular .8320 Unleaded .8716 Diesel 112 .9310 Regular .7945 Unleaded .8245 Diesel 112 .8945 Delta Petroleum J-Mc Oil Company o Industrial Fuels o Reeder Distributors o All of the above vendors bids are based on curre.nt market prices, and reserve the right to increase/decrease as the market does. Recommendation: City of North Richland Hills purchase all their gas on the spot market at the best price based on Platts Oilgram. (Copy Attached) Platts Oilgram reflects the current wholesale prices for motor fuels and is published every working day. (Due to the continuing increase/decrease in the oil market.) Our goal is to buy our gasoline as close to wholesale price as possible. I I . e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I ''''I p. I Ie I DATE: February 27,1984 Page 2 The Citv of Fort Worth and PIano have ione -'to thi~ t"ypP of Procurpmpnt" on gasoline and found it to be extremlv beneficial. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove the above recommendation to purchase on the spot market in an amount not to exceed the budgetary limits as set forth by the council. BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: 01-60-04-2850 e I I I .. '. I!'" '\J ,,' t':\' t t' ,.: IJ (' \< ~. I~ I, ~.; '; p ~ ) '~r I ,'T', V"'O~~S:i!t r>r¡(~\, rOB r~t¡'·f~rj.·'.. P· i:..·l:·n~~~'~-:·::~:~lrt-:¡:-I~f-i~:-'::-;J-w-~',:~:y-·'r;-.ü '..:~ ~ermjn,t¡s. ,"t mo..t points bulk "on'jl,;nl,ti :)f;('~\ ;\"r <h:··d~· .~,,~\' (. r,",r:¡itr pO·:d~rl~"~.. '-\ c:.\-C\l"t~ CH tf~~11rH)(.1Iry J:'OW,1fU:C) which .nay be offered by ind:vidu.l: (.0"\fJ.1:til··, .H(' ~h,:' ;,...:c:cj..:d in p\l~tc'd p ¡~,~~. t~ t ~ lJ L.. r L os An g c! ('~ x' '(~ ~·~)~:1r.,~ (~.)-f~ x ¡> {)rtland ~'Ai,', .....!,~. i '.~. ~;tn Fr.inci\co-l: .t..t Ray ·/:,.O....!II.\,n " ,. .¡ t t ; e /T ~ (; () ".~ ~i .J'.' . ),; - hO.. ~) ... }" k a; ì ,. ~n . / '.,~ 'J ~ .. ! ,.'j t .,' M J. J( 1. 0 % S \J , ~. u r F:" J". ,. \ ! ! .. i, I': ~ n ~ : d w r-: ') T C (J ,,\ '-) r Unfe4H1t-.? -'·;~nl. Un:~41c1('"~ ~ti:(jpr..-~) f. ~ it ~ ~·:~~::~r-:6.));,-;- ~'x. ìO-.\J.tJ.. ..; ,1\\ \,.1 . 7C)_(I(). 00 ,( 7~ì . (x>-~.r} . If) 'j ~ . o.}-.'{4 .9'J Hl . '.)5~~,'. 'Ÿ,I ;~ -:. ,~1-H9. 2'; ..;~: .. ~r¡;_:~(~. r.f· r.B . ·:n ..1)1 . ("J pric:e ldtt'II ~'. 7S-2.o' lowçr. N Q. 2f2J.!..r,.e' x7~-:Œ-78.0.f£x ,~7('. 70-78. 75 :..:71. SO-7<J .45x 7(,.00-78. 75 ~: . OCJ-86. , 5 A Ibuquer que U ,.! i 811: ~ Bois e C..~per D ~n'icr f) hoc n i ~ S it! t L a k e C it y ~~lf..' :t.~_ s' ~ . Cj ).....' ~ ". . ()) r Hl.()},";:~.~·, ~6. ~}-J\ I p 'J.) ~.1. ~,,) ,~4,.j . 'JI.) p,o. ~N~i} . fU IX. rJJ-þ). ')() 81 . ~~~·1.:iI R () C I( Y M t) U ~ T "I N ~~(r---_. ij"'1~Ó""':fi~:!lf¡; ~. (X)-lt1. ~S H'J .. ~')..t)().. SO HI... S()-.M / . ~ Mi.OO-HS.OO H7.. 50~n. ~ ~1..S5-H6.2Q A,k-,n~as Chl(a~~o C /)ttJrn bus D o~ Moinc\ f) .,tro1t M ,)f'i~t. P .:sur t H: I" h 0 n11 St. Louis No.1 ;and ,.. ~ u 1 '2 ~¡, . R r" u L~ r ~fj: >':~:';~'!-:''l)1 J'). HO-H! . '1:,1 Itl . ..>.:() . :~ If} . ~)..J~¡. (A) ~ ~1 . ~'~~)7 . (JJ :r.. 'O-HJ. t~.,~ 7'1.. 7'--H 1 .. 5~, ..,~) . :)()~2 . 1 i x keroseno (....', c;t~ \)v,r Nu. MIOC(tN"! INf:N r tJ nleadt;J-.-...._'-p,~;ñ. U nl~aded ~~r:-1:~M:-r¡rt Itft.. ?':-:A1r:t;l;r-- l(J . HO....· to ~ .. IS J .. i 't_'i () . . ~ " '¡,.1. ::0 -H:i. l~ .' H9. ~)- )O .15 HS. ~..¿jJ.OO~ )t(jO :20 . IV: . 7~...Ji~.. rlJ H9. 7.'\-90.15 ~\tj. lO-Ht,. 1.ì5 x "ij9.. ~)..90 .4~ x ~¡1. 7~~. ~~J _ ... _ ... .' . :- ;~ , ~.. 1 5 " 2 0 iI. l; U I fur W J; t. 0 n N Q, t' C) II Pre m. Unleaded xQ8. HOt JUi.~9..00 &~ . f~)-ð K. 'j() No. '2 FUfJ! xP,7;~'b¡; x~k. 50-91 .40 H9.6J-93 . tJD )(k7.7S-89.25 x90.00-94.3S M~."'S-8R.25 xfi"l. ~90. ~ ~7.00-91 .90 In Chh;4i¡o 4ntl Detroit T E '( A '\ ~ ~ U' F C I) .\ ~ r D ", c t R ( -t!;;: l:";j:,~~-?'.7\....·-'·...... ...:~:,I_'__,- .~e'":--,,\~..:. . ...'" I e u¡,'~;~~'~~¡m, AI. .~~.~~:i~~ ~:~~.:~:~' .' ,.~~. "~'~.""~,__~~~#'.; __.,.øqLlb-jJ-~,~i :' J.,.,."..,. '-..-i, '~".--,~, , -. ' '~.,~ _71 . ',.. .~. _ r..... "'_ f.U\ tfÞn ' a-i-'. ,')"";:1'. I) -'~1. -,,}.-,1. rJ I ~: 0 r Ie;, n s Arc- it :-:::. .. ':~: _.>~~.. (~J , d ,,, P 3 ,. J.. ...1 _~. . ¡ r,' ~.Jq. 1 itnd kero··~f';"t wJ",r¢ 'n.H~~vt 'd, g"")f'raf!y 6 ,t\ ()~fH p\:(), 2 ull. I I' I I I I Ie I D i ) tr I {; ! M;;¡;;Jt~ . y . N. r~ow Jersey i\ 'b~n y ,\ t I ~ '1t a, G A H~11inlore Uo:.lon ( t t .., ¡ e s r fJ n, S C (;'~(~n..oorc.'. NC '\í i.t ; n i f~ (". w H a ve£1 ;" ',f( ,. C) 1 k ' h II .Hi (' I ph ¡ .1 ' I: , " ( ~ ; r !: ~, ;' ~ i' 1 I ; II tj ..'" I'tfL: I~ ~ p... L 4" b ur g ~V"rr';l1gton, N.C. R e"~~I:~t( · ~ ,'I " i '. t ! , &1 Rf :1~,/).:ni1 : (:t ,t ';0. "'~,-;i t .4' ~ ~,: . ·,0.....;·, .l~) 7t}. ..')-.:~ '. "JS H1 .. t,J.ì_L. 1 . '/0 tr_~ . ():~\. i . (t) x~q .. '/l_'f} . ')') J\]'(). .~"J-: .'! . ~ ~~n. '~J~~!. }.: i ~~ . h1-i ; .' .. (I.) "'> 1 . t,~~t . : '\ ~n . f'{)~1 . 'Â) J(Hl..;i!~_ti". )-\ K~.-~,; ):; -:~I '.¡ MO. (l..H.' . 7 ~ uJ . t ~ ; I, ~ . 2·, -'St1 . (KJ ~:i . }',-t,' .(,,} P r t: rn.. U n I e a d e d -.. ~ .-...-............ - - _.......-.......-- x81) . 5O-H t) . (X) t, x ..~~~~~ ~~....., ';0 U T H ., r: A'.! 1 ': f~ M r N ;\!. 5 -u-;ïlc~r;l'-" -'r~( ~ ;":üm t~ .l ~ ~~ ¡ ; " r. 111; lYS~..t)"1~ 00 t H:~ . 25-.'~lÞ . ~) X ~p . <x')..Jo'8 . 1~ tt' . 'l.,~, . i'~. lÿ! . (1}~6. 10 h") . ¿~.....'i 7 .00 x~. ~J-'t). 80 x~3 .. ~.o..JS~'. ~ I(j . ~)_~ S . (I') h' .li~)l . '"j) X~). :1~-'i7 .15 ij.-: . OJ-S5. ?{) xRt). 4l)-.'i9. :is ffl .I',Ü '('!, ! . >. )·.P,I~.. "'l1 bIOi. O>-J;" 'IS 85.6~ "nl"4dcd f)~,~Ü:cJ~oot HI. "';--'f2 . SO X '1;' . ().~ 100. 2S HI). :!\-Hq. 75 Xljl). 6()-91 . ~ ')~ . ()~~96. 2~ ~UH. ~9.&> "H7, <J)-Jt9. ~ Ä~~1ì. (X1-x9.00 00. 71."\..4.)7 . ~ ~ ~ H . ':' ,·~·11 . 1 5 n';. n ._.ijt). 70 xiii ,.fi{)-';'~.. 5S 9/ . fj,J xHH. ~::)-'>O. ~1 1\li1.~9.7S ~'J. r,.; 1'{,. ~~~.!:~~. CO ;¡!.. ·,O...{,'i. (.D K erose no , No.1 I ue! )(1 Öi3T.:rf,-."t'Î.>,C )(1 OlS. 35-111 . ·~.o J\ )t 1') 7 . ~ 11 S. (,X) X t)ß.30 xl 04.00-107 .ßS xl OH. 7~ 1 ,,,. H')C ~i9. 7S-tuJ. 25_ 96.00-.104..00 xl 09,. 50-113. 7~ 96.00-10d .(Y)x x'O~.OO-110.00 xl 04 .«J.-I O'"¡.oo )" ( ~ f~ . 00-11 ~ . ~ ~ ,1(,)s.::r_l0 ~ 4 q) ~')ij. OCJ-l 00. ~ ~~.80 No.6 Fuel (~) ~1a~17.00· 26.2S-26.~ 27.00-30.25 No. '2,/Dlestr 81 .~.25t M6. 00-87 .00 87 . 50-91 . SO 87.00-87. SO 83.30-84.æ 78.75-81.00 87 . OC>-87 . SO No.6 Fuel 73.00-78.00t 71 .00 66.00 1$ M a x 1 %, M pi s/S t . No.2 Fuel xrfs. ~v~t xRR. 1)1)..93 . SO X 88 ~O~:-sW ~.'. - JL xR~.00-90.1S x~a . 00-91 . SO No.2 Fuel x1Õ2·::~1õS.9Stx x101.35-102.oo en. 65-1 05.oox ~8~00-93.~x 1(96.00-101.70" x, 00. 35-104. 55 )(90. 75-92.2'5 x x90.~7.00 xs().OS-91.4S 99.00-103.10 x93.35-98.oox .100.00-101 .80x 92 . SO- 102.00 x101.00-104.65x xRQ.4S-91.00 ßð. 7>-93. SOx 90.. 50-91 . SO ATLANT:C AND GULF COA-;r RESID D t ~ t r let No. ~ F u e I --1\f'; t. ....,.> rue f D ¡-:~ l( No.. 4 F u t. , No. 6 F u e I "j, y. H~rbor $:~~':()",j7::it~.~"~ $~;r>,:S~;:;:-RSah M"'[t'·¡2~"í-· ~29.SO-- ,'\It.~ny ,,·ri.~~ot\-J4"'~~·;h 't<J.~~Rh,·1O."15th Now tiavcn 14.c.x)ch-37.00çh 31.9Jch-34.70ch Ii.ftirnore J~,.-':"~h :~, .'t~c-3~.~..och N. é)(t"~n~ Area 26.70h fh~~ton 0.5"5 T/ .;JÞh-]7 ..~bh :J6.~x)bh-3t).30b Norfolk 33.9Sçh 29.S4fh-30.OSfh Max 1 (~~ ~i(t. :l·H~h-jh .-;1; c 34 . (j)c-34. ""J~ It ~ hit ~.~ r.1 pnll )~. 75bh-3S. ~bh 33. ~bh-33. 7Sbh ~.' 2.2%5 j". ~~a¡~h-:'n ..tX)g ~ort'_f,J 34.CJóc 30.20 C h ;,.rlo~ tun, SC :1-'. (~oh-'3'5. 4;'t e ~'.I, .~~ 1 tt-JO. O:,fh 'i~ v 4rro.ah 33. 35 ~3S. 981 28.58,29.98' J .Lc:ksonviiro J4.l,,()t1h ~·¡).(}.),"1O."/~;(HI ~vil'n'n~tl)n, NC 33.Cj5eh-35.98e 29. 98, 29.49fh Whon aV,~iI4~1~ rtrlcð. ¡, for low pfJfJr" tL~:h :>Qur gener.lly 10-1'jt bhl :ess. Key to nl~X ~u'fur content: (~) 0.3" lu\ 0.5'11; i¡;, ¡.., .~! :.:","1 !d ;.;.:'~ it! ';.J'.'~. 11:1 'l.1'1j.., ÇÝr\h!m!"r /lri,~s r~t:.:cl"d by (II). Some supp!lers I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I · tar of t Ile ~1ehupJex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: I VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS Request For: Gasol ine I ReedeJl f)~tJvibu.toJ(l" Inc.. BOx8231 Ft. Wo~h, Tex4ð 16124 BidOpeningDate:February 13,1984 at 10:00 A.M. I Date: ReQuisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 A. M . February 13, 1984 City of North Richland Hills. P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills. Texas 76118 ATTN; City Secretary Phone: 281-0041 liTEM 1 2 DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 50,000 90,000 7 000 UNIT Gallons Gallons Gallons UNIT PRICE TOTAL I Re ular Gas Unleaded Gas iesel 112 6267 50 I . . I I I I I I I I TERMS Und %75 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 1 DAYS FROM I RECEIPT OF ORDER. The 'City of North Rlchland Hills Purchas- ing Dept. reserves the right 'to reject any or all bids, waive formali- ties. or to award purchases on an indIvidual item basis when in Its ~st interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- I We FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.S, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. SUB-TOTAL TOTAL BID I IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAi AC CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NOR1H RICH LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: -Rt' C! fit' Jt 1>] ðtJtÆ. huto tL6 BY: (..,,6 f!. Y J.1· ~ e f ¡) E t( PHONE N UMB~: ~'l9-159 51 SIGNATuRE~'t'171 r'þ7 · r~~E: ~2:::.s i THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER V I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie 1- GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Ricþland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the 'City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) (b) (c) (d) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. Proposal containing any irregularities. Unbalanced value of any items. Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation ~ith the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered _ t among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, e~c. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6 . AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7 . ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the wri,tten consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager! Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay ~imely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9 . BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the' term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) I I_ I I I I I I (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive~ and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product. his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I 1_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I GENERAL CONDITIONS MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASE 1. Delivery shall be to the location identified on the purchase order within the City of North Richland Hills. 2. The contract will be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications at the price bid. 3. In the event of partial shipments or multiple deliveries, the quantities shown on the bid are estimated quantit~es only. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to purchase more than or less than the quantities shown. In any event, the unit bid prices shall govern. 4. Bidder warrants that all deliveries made under the contract will be of the type and quality specified; and the City of North Richland Hills Purchasing Agent may reject and/or refuse any delivery which falls below the quality specified in the specifications. The City of North Richland Hills shall not be held to have accepted any delivery until after an inspection of same has been made and an opportunity to exercise its right of rejection has been afforded. 5. All manufacturers' warranties shall inure to the benefit of the City of North Richland Hills, and replacement of" defective materials shall be made promptly upon request. 6. Failure by the contractor to make reasonable delivery as and when requested shall entitle the Purchasing Agent to acquire quantities from alternate sources wherever available, with the right to seek reimbursement from the contractor for amounts, if any, paid by the City of North Richland Hills over and above the bid price. 7. All materials delivered shall be free of any and all liens and shall upon acceptance thereof become the property of the City of North Richland Hills free and clear of any materialman's. supplier's, or other type liens. 8. Regardless of the award of a contract hereunder, the City of North Richland Hills retains the right to purchase the same or similar materials or items from other sources should it be determined that doing so would be in the City's best interest, based on cost and quality considerations; however, in such event, the contractor will be given the first option of meeting or rejecting the proposed alternate source's lower price or higher quality. 9. Acceptance by the City of North Richland Hills of any delivery shall not relieve the contractor of any guarantee or warranty, express or implied, nor shall it be considered an acceptance of material not in accordance with the specifications thereby waiving the City's right to request replacement of defective material. I I I_ I I I I I -I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS P. O. BOX 18609 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions, and the specifications, and other conditions attached hereto the following. Annual ~iotor Fuels Contract per City of North Richland Hills Specifications In making this offer, the undersigned, as an independent vendor, agrees to sell the products set forth at the following prices hereby bid: Annual Motor Fuels Contract per City City of North Richland Hills Specifications. Item ~ Unit Description Unit Cost Total Cost 1 50,000 gal Regular gas. ,7Q '1~- .'1'7 7J ;-~ (0 2 90,000 gal Unleaded gas . ~;. 4 S- "7 '-I '1 (j ';-, ,: L 3 7,000 gal Diesel 112 . A94 S- C ~ c· I , ~ (' Terms N 1-:" T' % . ~. days Total J J ¡) I q I. S ..' I ~ Annual Motor Fuels Contract for the above are e~timated requirements. Owner reserves the right to purchase more/less than the quantities shown. I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I The undersigned here by offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the t~rms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the s·pecifications and any other condition's that may be attached and further cert i fy tha t our at ta ch ed pro posa 1 s ubmi t ted by 7?P~ r/pJt 1>i. J..:/"Jt.1 hu:/"nJt.A complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland1s bid specification, be it further specified that any non compliance with the ' City of North Richland Hills specifications is to be outlined in detail stating said vendors exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills acceptance' of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part there of. '>{~ 'Îl1, ~,/. Signed T' 1 P#tu idelQt It e ~~tf'C4 'J _1 fJ- Rd Date f)DDrlDh 1)] ~1-",1 fUl1-nhA. Campa ny Name TH IS MUST BE SlJ3MITED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION. 1 I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I t DATE: February 27,1984 i-1 SUBJECT: One K.W. Emergency Generator DEPARTMENT: Fire Department BACKGROUND: On February 13,1984 at 10:00 A.M. bids for the above mentioned item were opened, and the results are outlined below. (5 Bid Specifications were mailed and 3 returned) VENDOR Lightbourn Equipment Casco Industries Waukesha-Pearce Ind. EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT NO BID $7,980.00 $6,550.00 o o The above equipment will be installed at Fire Station #3. It will replace the emergency generator now in use at station #3, which will be relocated to Station #1. ( Station #1 does not have an emergency generator) The generator will be used to supply emergency power to emergency lighting, fire radios and station doors at Station #3, in the event of a power failure. The generator now in use at Station #3 will not power all that is required, but once it is relocated to station #1 it will more than supply enough emergency power for the smaller station. This item is part of the 1983-1984 Fiscal Budget, as approved by the City Council. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve /Disapprove the purchase of one(l) K.W. Generator in the amount of $6.550.00 from Waukesha-Pearce Ind. BUDGETED ITEl-I: YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: -' I ~"'\, '\ " ..... .i.:' t" s I Ie CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND .HILLS, TEXAS r VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS tNFOBMAu..aH..DUNVELOPE: ---- -'---- "-"- --~ I Waukesha-Pearce Ind. R ~uest For: E - ----..- , mergency Generator P.O. Box 2365 Bid Opening Date: February Irving, Texas 75061 13,1984 at 10:00 A . }1 . Date: I Requisition No. 11327 Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 A. M. Fe brua r 13,1984 City of North Richland Hills, P. Q. 80x 18609 y North R ichland Hills, Texas 76118 I ATTN:Cit7 Secretarv Phone: 281-0041 ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 model 10RHM61 Kohler 120/240 volt sinQ1e Dhase 1 Each $6,550.00 $6,550.0( I gasoline fueled eli?c-tric n7~n+- ~r1mn7ÞrÞ Lri-l-'h all standard accessories and the f~llowing options: Weather Housinq (air vac) with I battery, battery rack, battery cables, block neater, unit filled with lube oil. (1) K2 242 31-o07n Xn'h 7 Þ T 7?n / ?~() trr. 7 r -I-L'r. ~ 7 0 I 70 amr> automatic transfer swi tch in a Ner:a Onp enclosure with delay on engine starting, automat~c plant exerciser. With freight allowed I to location. I I I I I I I I SUB-TOT AL $6,550.0 I '-... ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOT AL BID $6,550.0 TERMS Net 151fc> prox. DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID. VENDOR AGREES THAT I RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 60 DAYS FROM CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE t RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH R ing Dept. reserves the fight to reject any or all bids, waive formati- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD C( 1_ ties, or to award purchases on an individuar item basis when in its TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE E XCLUD" COMPANY: Waukesha-Pearce IndJa ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF BY: ;:::::¡;;-~..,¡ ,7Ã,.", ÁA c·t ¡; In\; NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. PHONE-NUM -;J.~ 214/445-nn"n4 , .J 77,,1.4 -r _1L~' · ?11n I SIGNATURj7 í I ~ / '" DATE: - It THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER / ~tar of tile ~etToplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I. II. Page 1 of 5 SPECIFICATIO~S FOR k~ E}ŒRGESCY GE~ERATOR Information, General Generator is to be capable of supplying ten (10) K.W.. gasoline fueled. 120/240 volts, single phase, remote starting, 41.5 ampheres. Engine Specifications Casoline Engine, 60 Hertz 4-Cycle Type V4-Cy11nder Arrangement Displacement - 108 in.3 Bore and Stroke - 3~ x 3~ in. Piston Speed - 915 ft/min. Bearing.: Main., Number - 2, taper roller type Rated rpm. - 1800 rpm. Maximum HP at rated rpm. - 22.5 HP Cylinder head type and material - L head, aluminum Piston type and material - 3 ring, aluminum Crankshaft material - drop forge iron Valves material - stellite faced Rotors - 4 Covernors - gear driven centrifugal Regulation and frequence, no load to full load-5 Steady state regulation ± 0.5% frequency CHECK COt-1PLIA~ YES NO G 0 G) 0 ø 0 G 0 G 0 o 0 o 0 G 0 o 0 ® 0 ® 0 €) 0 €> 0 €) 0 Ð 0 €) 0 €) 0 Û 0 I of 5 I III. Engine Cooling YES NO Cooling air - 1220 CF}! G> 0 Ie Maximum air intake restriction in. water - . 5 in. ø 0 I IV. Engine Fuel System I Maximum lift of fuel pump - 4 ft. ø 0 Fuel Consumption - load I Casoline, when full 2-gal./hr. ® '0 I v. Lubricating System Oil pan capacity - 1 gal. ® 0 I 011 filter - bypass type ® 0 I VI. Engine Electrical System Ie Voltage - 12 D.C. 0 0 ø 0 Battery - 90 ampere hour I I VII. Generator Insulation - Class F ø 0 I Number Bearings - 1 ø 0 0 0 Rotor balancing - dynamic I Exciter - rotating type Û 0 Voltage regulation. no load full + Ð 0 I to load - - 5% Wave form deviation factor, no load - full load 0 0 NEMA MGl-22.42 I Telephone influence factor - TIF - NEMA t-1GI-22.43 0 0 I Ie I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 of 5 VIII. Remote Mode Must provide electric starting by means of a start/stop switch located on the controller or by two-wire remote control. Overcranking protection arranged to open the cranking circuit after 30-90 seconds. Includes over- cranking reset button and alarm circuit contacts IX. Additional Accessories, Engine and Generator Low Oil Pressure cutout High Temperature cutout Air vac cooling Crankcase heater Weather Housing x. Exhaust System Accessories Residential exhaust silencer, mounted and installed XI. Fuel System Accessories 6-881. gasoline tank, installed XII. Additional Accessories, System Bidder to supply automatic transfer switches with following features and accessories: Features: All switches are UL-l008 listed and CSA certified. They meet the voltage ~pulse withstand test in accordance with the proposed NEMA standard ICSI-109 and voltage. surge withstand capability in accordance with ANSI/IEEE C37.90-l978. Rated for all classes of load, both inductive and non-inductive. 100% equipment rated. Suitable for continuous duty at the rated current, either open or enclosed, without derating. YES NO ø o Q G Q G o o o o o o @ o ø o ~ o ø o o G ~ o I . of 5 YES NO Q 0 0 0 ø 0 0 0 ø 0 G 0 G) 0 'Features (Con't) ,I Ie ~techanically held on nOf::1al and e::1cr;ency. True double throw construction, innerently mechanically and electrically interlocked. UL component recognized accessories available for field installation or factory installed. I High speed transfer, 1/6 second or less, including relay operating time for all capacities. I Engine start contacts (close on power failure). Gold flashed contacts. I Full phase aenaina of no~l source individual phase relaya set for 70% dropout. 90% pickup. I Modular type construction I All funct10dal adjustmenta. both standard equipment and a~ce.sories. are lockable or recessed to make them tamperproof. Locking does not affect adjustments. Q o I All relays, either standard or accessory, are of the plug-in type with sprin¡ retainina clips (except normal .ouree voltaae sen.in¡ relays which are bolted to the paael ~ o Ie I I Engine .tart contact. (close on pover failure). Cold flashed contacts. Q o Accessorie.: Frequency voltage relay for emergency source, non-adjustable. Monitors I phase only. o o I Test button for seperate mounting. The momentary test switch shall interrupt power to the normal source relay and simulate a power failure on normal as long as the switch is held in the test position. ø o I Time delay on engine start shall be fixed at three (3) seconds. ® o I Plant exerciser for periodic exercising of the emergency generator set. Timer is adjustable over a 336 hour (14 day) period in increments of 30 min. Timer does not simulate a normal source failure. The automatic is not to be affected. The generator set is signalled to run unloaded for the set time period. All features and accessories of the transfer switch, time delay devices and exerciser are to be so arranged so that they form one complete unit installed in a NEMA-l enclosure for easy installation and maintenance. Q o I I Ie I o o I XIII. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 5 of 5 Bidder shall furnish all warranty information, parts and maintenance publications and all necessary wiring diagrams needed fçr install- ation and maintenance of unit and accessories. YES NO ø o . I I Ie I I I I I I 'Ie I I I I I I I Ie I The undersigned here by offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, . on the terms and conditions contained in thi5 proposal. the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by Waukesha-Pearce Industries, Inc. complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland's bid specification, be it further specified th~t any non compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications is to be outlined in detail stating said vendors exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part there of. THIS MUST BE SlBMITED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION. I KOHLER Ie GENERATORS I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I HOUSINGS 6.5-20 KW prime power/standby system accessory When indoor installation space is limited, a Kohler weather-protective housing makes outdoor genera- tor set installation both possible and practical. Kohler housings are built to withstand severe weather. They are made of reinforced steel and painted inside and out with rust inhibitors to assure long life and maximum protection, then finish coated in "Kohler gold." Each housing is designed to match specific Kohler models so that the controller and all service points are easily accessible. To add to the protection provided by a Kohler weather housing, locking kits are also provided. Each housing has a system of fixed louvers for effi- cient air flow. Other standard equipment includes a mounted fuel tank (except 20 KW size), battery rack, industrial silencer and hinged controller access door. GENERATOR SET TANK MOUNTED HINGED KW Inches Centimeters (CAPACITY BATTERY INDUSTRIAL CONTROLLER H W L H W L IN GAllONS) RACK SilENCER ACCESS 6.5 (air/gas) 293/. 26% 46 '/. 75.57 68.25 117.48 8 X X X 7.5 (Ie/gas) 26% 30' '/, 6 58718 67.63 77.95 149.54 7,5 X X X 8.5 (ai rId i) 37 '12 303/8 60!>/8 95.25 77.15 153.99 6,75 X X X .1Q.1aWM.§L ..1.Z1~ 11- .~ ~ 68.58 143,51 ..§.15 -X _Þ- -þ 12.5 (Ie/gas) 44 3/. 27 54 '12 113.67 6ã58 138.43 8.25 X X X 12.5 (d ille) 443/. 27 65'1& 113.67 68.58 165.42 6.75 X X X 15 (air/gas) 44 33 '12 673/. 111.76 85.09 172.09 22.5 X X X 20 (Ie/gas, di) 3671s 33 62 93.7 83.82 157.5 X X X KEY: air. , . . , . . . . . . . . air-cooled Ie ' , . . . . . . . . . liquid cooled x . . . . . , standard equipment gas......,. gas or gasoline di . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , diesel I I( Ie I KOHLER lronsfer Switches 30 through 800 amperes single coil solenoid actuator, relay logic I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I \ Ie I Series R38™ automatic transfer switches standard features · All switches are UL-1008 listed and CSA certified. They meet the voltage impulse withstand test in ac- cordance with the proposed NEMA standard 1 CS1-109 and voltage surge withstand capability in accordance with ANSI/IEEE C37.90-1978. · Rated for all classes of load, both inductive and non-inductive. · 1000/0 equipment rated. Suitable for continuous duty at the rated current, either open or enclosed, without derating. · Mechanically held on normal and emergency. · True double throw construction, inherently mechan- ically and electrically interlocked. · UL component recognized accessories available for field i nstallat ion or factory installed. · High speed transfer, 1/6 second or less, including relay operating time for all capacities. · Engine start contacts (close on power failure). Gold flashed contacts. · Full phase sensing of normal source individual phase relays set for 700/0 dropout, 900/0 pickup. · Modular type construction. · All functional adjustments, both standard equip- ment and accessories, are lockable or recessed to make them tamperproof. Locking does not affect adjustments. · All relays. either standard or accessory. are of the plug-in type with spring retaining clips (except nor- mal source voltage sensing relays which are bolted to the panel). · Engine start contacts (close on power failure), Gold flashed contacts. standard accessories C For a complete listing of standard accessories. see page 3, I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KOHLER GENERATORS 10 K,^ ac air-cooled, natural gas, LP gas, gasolin 60 HERTZ MODELS Model 11L~ 10RM81 Gasoline KW/KVA 1.011.0- 10/12.5 Natural Gas· KW/KVA 10/10 10/12.5 LP Gas KW/KVA 1.QL1 0 10/12.5 Voltages 120/240 120/208 Phase -1._.. 3 Starting ~Remote Remote Amperes --4.L5 35 All single phase units are rated at 1.0 power factor. 3 phase units at 0.8 power factor. Derate approximately 3,5°'0 per 1000 ft (300 m.) above 500 ft (150 m.) above sea level. Derate 1%, for every 10<0 F (5'.2 C C) above 85° F (300 C). · Derate 500 watts when using natural gas with air vac cooling, RATINGS: All models are continuous standby rated Unit will operate at this rating for the duration of any power outage. '" . ~ .- .:-1-:.:.. -: ¡.. ... " , .... . 1', .{ t )I. , í.... ~~t.r-- ..a - . "tLc-_= Availability is subject to change without no- tice. Kohler Co. reo serves the right to change the design or specifications with- out notice and with- out any obligation or liability whatsoever. Avai labi Itty can be determmed by con- tacting your local Kohler Co. Distributor. , .. ,. -::.'J~ . à-:' -. : (: .J --, -0 . . -I-~j ~, , . ì . : ~ 1 c 1 .<- __ ._+. 1_ .-' t _...¡ ,.(7 - (í1r¡tf;~: \ Et.s~, -..,. - .iifi· ~~~----:,..: - .. _ í I .; - . .~~ I." "_"I . ~ - .. - ...... .', ...,. till; . po . --, . ---...j . (.: f - ..,. =. ·..l .. ( ;..... Approximate net weight: 696 Ibs. 316.3 kg. Nominal dimensions: 381~1'''' long, 29~8" high, 21 V2" wide 98.9 em long, 75.8 em high, 54.6 em wi I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~f DATE: February 27, 1984 SUBJECT: Ordinance Correcting the Zoning Map DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: This ordinance corrects the zoning map on the tracts of land that we discussed in the last Pre-council meeting. The tract of land identified as Item 6 on the list was previously zoned commercial; therefore it is not necessary to change it from C-2 to C-l. The zoning map is therefore correct as published. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: adopted on January 9, 1984. Approve the ordinance correcting the zoning map BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. i Ð q 1 WHEREAS, on January 9, 1984, the City Council passed a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 1080); and, WHEREAS, the City Council, in such Ordinance adopted a Zoning Map; and, WHEREAS, certain clerical errors were made in the preparation of such Zoning Map which have now been discovered; and, I WHEREAS, such errors involved the zoning of certain below described subdivisions and tracts as R-2, C-2, and R-6T Districts when in fact the Council had no intention of changing the zoning of such subdivision and tracts and the classification that should have been on the Zoning Map is AG and C-1 as stated in Section 1 had a clerical error not been made. I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Rich1and Hills, Texas that: I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 1. The Zoning Map of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, adopted by Ordinance No. 1080, is ordered corrected to reflect the following zoning of: Tract 1 of Abstract 1266, Stephen Richardson Survey to AG instead of R-2; Tract 2H, 2H1, and 2HIA of Abstract 1040, John McComas Survey to AG instead of C-2; Tract 2A2 of Abstract 1606, William W. Wallace Survey to C-l instead of C-2; Block 2, Snow Heights North Addition to C-1 instead of C-2; Tract 2B of Abstract 1588, J. M. Vandusen Survey to C-1 instead of R-6T. 2. In order to correct the clerical errors in the Zoning Map adopted by Ordinance No. 1080 the City staff shall treat the above described subdivision and tracts as being zoned as outlined above. 3. The City Council specifically adopts all of the above findings as being findings of the City Council. r I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ lie 11 Ordinance No. Page Two 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and approval. day of ,1984. PASSED AND APPROVED this Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney I rT::-~: ~-~-,'--~'~~~·-1~~~-:;~.{-!·l , ., ' , ' !'. .... "', .. I _! , -.. --: .------- i .', I· , --.-----.,-- t e - _H .----- : I' f··d- i':,:' - ------ 1 I I: ~: i=i___ 7. \ \- _ "I 1 Dí-.TE mED ] I I 1 I Ie I I I I I I I (e I 1 LAW OFFICE OF " flU J I- /JA. ':'~ r" j ¢ GARY L. NICKELSON 1405 FIRST UNITED BUILDING 410 WEST SEVENTH STREET (817) 332-4000 FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102 February 22, 1984 Ms. Jeanette MOore City Secretary, No. Richland Hills P.O. Box 18609 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Re: Doyne & Myrtis Byrd & Claude Byrd, Property located at 8017 Grapevine Hwy., North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Ms. MOore: I represent Doyne & Myrtis Byrd aOO Claude Byrd the owners aOO operators of the property at 8017 Grapevine Hwy., North RichlaOO Hills, Texas aOO Byrd' s Automotive. We would like to cane before the pre-coun- cil meeting on February 27, 1984 to discuss laOO use of the above-de- scribed property aOO other matters of mutual concern. We appreciate your iOOulgence in allowing us time to meet with yoo at that time. Please notify me at the above address or phone number if this is acceptable. GLN/eIm Sincer y y~ --~ ckelson ~ cc: Mr. & Mrs. Doyne Byrd Mr. Claude Byrd