HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1984-03-12 Agendas
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 12, 1984 - 7:00 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. Discussion of Community Development
Block Grant (Mackey Creek)
2. Discussion of Insurance Bids (Agenda
Item 1112 )
3. Discussion of Budget Adjustment (Agenda
') .... I' .._..
Item 1116) i.) í &:C)Jk \.<l-VL<, 1,.,
4. Discussion of ~S 84-14 (Agenda Item #8)
" ¿<Q<~ ¡jd.L / ' tjl
5. Discussion of 1984 Capital Improvements
Plan (Agenda Item #15)
6.
f~
vß}'v \,~
¡I' wr
,.1"\, .... t~
I I J !
-~
- - if
Discussion of Other Items
I-
I
Ie
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richlanâ Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
I 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
;1
I
I
I
Ie
I
NUMBER ITEM
.Y;- Call to Order
("
þ'~ Roll Call
~-. Invocation
~ Consideration of Minutes of the Regular
Meeting February 27, 1984.
5~' Consideration of Removing Item (s) from the
,............-
Consent Agenda LI .J- I ()
l
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 12, 1984
ACTION TAKEN
þ('
Consideration of Consent Agenda Item (s)
Indicated by Asterisk (#7, 9, 10, 11, 12,
/\
13,14,15,16 & 17~/7A)
*r(
v
.e,· ' <-£ . 'L."-t'
!}
-t', L r.-L k:~' jI 'w- J
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-117 - Request of
Gene Huggins for Replat of Block 42C-R,
Richland Terrace Addition (Located at the
Northeast corner of Northeast Loop 820
Service Road and Cloyce Drive)
/
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-14, Request of
TLBC-GSC Enterprises for Final Plat of
Lot 5, Block C. College Hill Addition
(Located at the Northwest Corner of Holiday
Lane and Bogart Street)
I-
I
Ie
For the Meeting conducted at the
I 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 12, 1984
North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
ITEM
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-17 - Re uest of
Burk Collins Investments for Final Plat of
Lot 3, Block 50, Nor'East Addition (Located
on the West side of Davis Boulevard,
bounded on the West by Roberta and on the
North by Lola Drive)
ACTION TAKEN
~
,
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-18, Request of
Gulf Oil Corporation and Cambridge
Companies for Replat of Blocks 2R & 4R,
Snow Heights North Addition (Located at the
Northeast Corner of Rufe Snow Drive and
Northeast Loop 820 Service Road)
~£
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-20, Request of
Sueann Flory for Final Plat of Lot 8, Block
1, Mollie B. Collins Addition (Located on
the North side of Odell Street and
approximately 225 feet West of Smithfield)
*~-:..<"-
Consideration of Bids for Auto Liability
Insurance
*~/
Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate
#3, to Steele-Freeman in the amount of
$145,370.16 - Northfield and Norich Park
Improvements
I-
I
Ie
For the Meeting conducted at the
I 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
NUMBER
*~
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
l1ARCH 12, 1984
North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
Consideration of Partial Payment~ Estimate
#6~ to M.A. Vinson Construction Company in
the amount of $31,333.35 - Walker's Branch
Draina~e Improvements
*~
Consideration of Adoptin~ the 1984 Capital
Improvement Work Plan
~
Consideration of Amending the 1983-84
Bud~et to add two Building Inspector
Positions and a Clerk II Position
*
Consideration of Resolution Certif in
Absentee Ballots for the April 7, 1984
Municipal Election
~.~ --~i.,'i.
ß__
18.
Citizen Presentation
Mr. Jack Roseberry
Re: Proposed Clean Up Campaign
Sponsored by ERA Realtors
19.
Adjournment
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I-
I
, '\
!,í~.
:)-l;f.i!iV'
/ '.I
v ~ \~
'~/
V
¡;
K NOWL TON-E NG LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC.
/ 7 /~\
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
March 9, 1984
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-546, CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS
DENTON HWY WATER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.2
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2 dated
March 9, 1984, made payable to Panhandle Construction Co., in the amount
of $146,429.30 for materials furnished and work performed on the
referenced project as of February 25, 1984.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $146,429.30, be made to
Panh~ndle Construction Co., P.O. Box 1500, Lubbock, Texas 79408.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you
may have concerning this project.
~ r2z-:-
P.E.
RWA/l1g
Enclosures
cC~Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
Mr. Scott Jenogan, City Inspector
Panhandle Construction Company
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
-I ~;i~m~~-~~546. w:2 Job No. -3-5¡6------------~:i~; Day~-- 0 -O~=NAR_:l{~~-
~oject Description: DENTON HIGHWAY WATER SYSTEMS W.O. Date: 09-DEC-1983
1 Contt'actor: Panhandle 0 con~tt:~~i7~~lg~~ F~t' Mat-:~~:~~I;~~~~:~-;~t~~~-~:~~~----7~MAY~1~84-
Owner: City of North Richland Hills Performed in Period Ending: 25-FEB-1984
ce~Dr.t.h_-Richlan d---Hiil s Ii me--Ch~ed-T.ht:u-.E'eeio d_JDa y-s) _: ,__ -------...1!L.
CON T RAe TOR'S
EST I MAT E
Page 1 of 1
------
- - - - - - - -
---------------------------- ---- --------- --------- --------- ----------- -----------
PREVIOUS THIS UNIT
ITEM_ DESCEUffID~ UNIT___.£SI IJ1iH~ESII MATE --HJIAL___PRl CE_______ AMOUNT _____
1 24" D.ia.....-D_.L-Wa..te~e L.£L-___Ct._O_ __ 2358._0____235.8...0_ _$4-4-.0.Q___$lQJZ52..Q(;L
2 16" Dia. D.I. Water Pipe L.F. 1825.0 . 937.0 2762.0 34.00 93908.00
3 6" Dia. Water Pipe L.F. 38.0 0.0 38.0 20.50 779.00
~~.L\L.--.Ìi14" B)$a.s;>_LBoxes EacH 0.0 ---.D---º----O-._9__]J:n.....s-º______._____º_.Q-º_
5 16" G.V. w/4" Bypass EACH 0.0 0.0 0.0 3898.47 0.00
6 10" G. V. & Box EACH 1. 0 0.0 1. 0 650.00 650.00
7__e~G.'Y a_8L B.o1< E.ACH_____Qa_-º__ -1-.-0-___LJ)____.9J5 .-ºº--__.____435 ._QO_
8 6" G.V. & Box EACH 1.0 5.0 6.0 285.00 1710.00
9 14" Gate Tapping Valve & Box EACH 0.0 0.0 0.0 1985.00 0.00
1 0 t,.J~~~_Than 16" P ie.e----.D-"~Ft gs L. ªL-47QLQ..----.2J2-0-"-º_Z3~Q._Q...____._1._!..Z5___2_~ªZ ~Q_
11 16" & Over Pipe D. I. Ftgs L.B. 3730.0 6770.0 10500.0 1.25 13125.00
12 Fire Hydrants EACH 1.0 5.0 6.0 800.00 4800.00
13 D. I. Fire Hydrant Lead Pipe t-.F. 6.0 13.9 19.0 -~ºLQ-º--~ª-2~;¡_Q_
14 Branch & Sump Manhole EACH 0.0 2.0 2.0 2242.00 4484.00
.~~_~~~e_~_~~:a~:~~:~:e & Vault ~:g~_~:L~:~___~:~__2~~_~~_:_____ ~~~~_
_7 B. or T. to< Pt'es. Grout 30"WSC L. F. 80.0 0.0 80.0 170.00 13600.00
18 Asphalt Pavement Replacement L.F. 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.00 0.00
tî....R,ªJº.c;ªt.e__S" G. V. & B_o~____t;aCI:L._ ---º~.º----_-l!..Q__.____t.Q__ ____.525.00___ _ o. ___5.25.00
20 Relocate Exist. 6" G.V.& Box EACH 1.0 0.0 1.0 525.00 525.00
21 Conc. Driveway Replacement S.F. 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.00 0.00
~ .cº1:Lc:r...etf;LEnccase!!LEIDI L. F. O. 0 1330. 0 IJ~O..~__t~. 0~.J_~_5.0_,,--º.Q_
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1~~~I~~~~f~~U~m~~--~-~-~~9li~~lO~S.~~---
I ~: (~~~~~~~i~) -~: ~
,;1 Date:
I
I
J-
,19_
Date:
--/'Pr¡u ,. ?
· 19-8.4--
:': --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total · · · · · · · . . . . . . . $261620.00
Les~e_r ~ent--.JXLRe.t_~tiD.eJ:L~__"_ J ()7____~_6_l!:l~!I_ 00
Diffet"ence · · · · . . . .. . . . . .. 235458.00
Plus (%) Materials on Hand 75% 0.00
Total......... ....~,..... .Z3545a.OO
Less previous payments . . . . . . . .. 89028.70
Difference Due This Estimate $146429.30
-----.J.Npt-~;-e-ay-Lc;i-$-t_êJ'oj;)_Ynt__Sh Q~J1.)~__. ==~_=?_~=:__
pt-a.LEa~ni 1195-1lnc.l---Behi 1:\. ) :
< ... Time Charged Thru This Period:
$261~~_LQº--~i_~_:~J_Q9_6_~~._~~~.r.çª_lJ~ :
79 Time: 150 Percent:
84.4S
52.67
j
:1
I
.-
j .
I-
t
:
j
I
-
I
-"
"1 . .-
.
..'
. ~:
)' ~ I
I E--
. : I
~
fI.)
I
:.
~.
~I
o
I .
~
u.
-(
0::
E--I
:z;
o '.
UI
I
1 .
:'.
I :
.9~o
...c
~ ~
co 'M ~ 00
co co
.0 .0
Q) t)~ Q)
~ ~~ ~
~ ~ co
N O')t- N <0
~
o
.. .... ....
Q> Q) \1.0
~~~18 ~~
..t5Q05:ö~
~ Q)~ .c:¡ c:o
~ -;;, q -~ 'g ~ --
Q.c. Q ~~iOj~"'8
~ "'0 -- --
o,<J)J..Lo
~oCQ)Q)
Orno..ø..
C c: ::s
~~~~I
::s, Q)
~~E~
~~Ob.O
CJ -- ~ 1.0
fI.) . 1.0 J.. Q: I
2~6
~ (1)
L E
o ~
~
~
?~
L ~ >.
6 0:: ã fI)
~ ~ ð~:: ~
.0 ~ -- x
03: 1::C~
>; c:~
~ 0 r::: ..
~~::~~ '
t:)oc)oC-
"""'4...-c ::s c). _
::c Cf.) 1.0 - - ::r:
æ.....t:t:
~~~~~
§ ai:213
;;~~
e:: 0
e:: a:I .c:
o or; ~+J
C +J &...
cø·- 0
~()Z
.I
. N J õ,
~ --
u;&..
Ö ~ì ~
Z Q)
Q
C1> ,
"c;j ~o ê;
-5 -~
+J 0
C'I). ....
~ Q.c
o
o
~ II
~ ~ I:
~ ~ ;:
ÇI). II
~ II
~~l
8~ II
-~ !,
~ E= I:
g: fß.
o =.- C\
I
E--t3I:
-- ,
58::
I
t
I
E-I
-,
5:
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
ð:
~¡
š¡
ÔI
. r
I
~J
--I
t
f
I
I
r
...J
~
I . I
000 OQ 0 0ô 0 ~oo 0,0 0 <::> <::> 0 0,000,1
o 0 0 0 ¡o 0 0 c an p 0 an 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0
. I. . . I~ . _ _ * * I.":: - · I· · - I· · · j. * . I
~ ~, ~ O.iO[ :¡; ~~,...O.~.'~ g g¡~.o o¡g <::) ~j~ c. ~
§r~ ~~r~~~Mr i~ .~I~. E
oboo OOOO~[OOOOObooboo
oO~~~OOOONNO~OOOOOOQOO
.~. ·1* * .!...~. .1-. .¡.. .1. ...
:M~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~O')~
~CO~~[' 0') co ~MN~ ~~
~r . - ,r N I , .
CONC:OO~~~ 000<00') oooo~~oo
Lt') <0 C"') I 0) O. ~ co M I
Mt- Mit') MIl
NN NO ~
.r
o ~ . 0 b tt') C"') ,...c 0
Nt- ,...c M
~t- MI
.N CO ~
~
I
I I, I I
~~~~i~~gg~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I I
~ ~ I I ~
~o 0 .- tt) Q) ~ Š ~ ;
~~_r Co Q), E' ¡
~ ~~z ~ ~ ~~ ~~
~~ ~I ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~
.- -- Cf.) c/) > .. I ct$ (1) > ,- 0 I_ 0..
c.. ~ Cf.) UJ ..... Q. CL>...... :: Q, CO C) _CU
t t' 4) ~ ~ I ~ 8.~ ~ ~ ~. ~ &! ~ rc :. d )
+J ~ 0. áJ ~ bð 0_. I C f > tJ) ....,.... · ¡ ~ ~
- r ø:.: d ><.~ ~ 8. ~ ~ ~ g ~ >: ~ ~ ~ .
: ~ · 0 ~ >< 0,,: ...... C'I) "0 > ~ &.. E; " C/) > ct$
· '.. c.. ~ ~ ~ _00 . 0. <0 ~ +J ~ . Lo CD Q) .... -_ C)
Þ-I ~ Q) ~ E': ¡:Q t:Q Cd,...c e:::c Q) ~ f >: >< Lo c:
· ~ +J .' ~ ~ .1. ~ c.. cø tf.) VJ ~ ~ a:s ex) (1) Q ~
Q '1 f > > · -tS. ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ Q.c (1) ~ (1)Q)
a:s c:e I > · · +J ,¡::, 0 ~ -- ~ C ["'"" +J .... +J .... +J
.-.... ~ · · · > > -~ E- I ::r: ~ .s::; ~ -- ¡ _ ~ ~ Q) Q) I
o Q .- 0 c (;) · ~ 0 ~ C) a::¡ ..... c.. a:s () c) 1.0 Lo
= :1 0': =' = 0 0 = ~:1 ~....: ; Lo ~ f "á.:: .£ g g
. ~ 1'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~:~,~~ 0 1 ~ ~ as ~ & 18 8
· l . .t. .1.. . .l. . . . .t. . . . . I
,...cNM~~~~~~C~NM~an~~CO~O~N
~ .,.Jc ~ ~ .,...104 ,...c 9""'4 ~ ~ ~ N N N
. i I
I
.... ....
"0 oW
C C
c9~
.t::J
O~
~ ct$
P-4
c.... I
O~
o
c ' .
o c
.- 0
.... .-
ct$..J
() Q:
.- E
~ Lo
c.,._
(1)~
>C
~8
(1)",:,
.- C
~a:s
I
I~ ~
, (1) c.,
I~ ~
......C
~.~
1f1) ~
t:b!)
!b!) e
c:.-
~.w
-ö !b ';
~ lS ~
~~8
0..10
.%ª
I,
VJi
C ~
o C1>
-_.__.~
.g.!) ZI Itr~&. ._........______..
I '
I :
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
!
I
I
10 0 0 :0 0 010
¡e:: e:: c: ~ c:: r: i ~
!~ ~ ~ I ~ ~:~
¡~t;;~1 ~~;:
ItO N ~ l CO") 00 ¡~
iN N Nrl
~ * ..,..
1'èR **j
I 0 , :U') 'II
,-.4 I to- * * III
I : I I :: I
* I * * I"
i : /. ::
*' I * * "
I : , q:
*' * I * * * III
I : ! I ::
* '(** II
I "C'. .1/
~: . * HI
~.;; : Ie 2 111 I
¡Q) +J I 'ej * e ill
;..- Q) I 1C ~ 'II I
tã. ~ : !e:: * ~ ~
ð" -.. I!O a:s ~
'èRrl ~~
-- I 1tI)* _
I ,~ CI)~I
~~I~*gfß
:.t: Q) !r- .- I
Lo () ~ ;.(1) >, .:en
f~~i*£~'
~Cf),in~cn~
~~~~R~P
.. ~
,:z. I
~
,co
Ie') I
~
.. I
, I
I
I
II
/. .
~
¡
f
~I
~
, I
I
!
J
J '"
, (1)
I >
J
I ....
I ~
,....
J C
t (1)
f ~
10.
f~
I
I+J
, ~
, ......
I~
I (I)
I (I)
~
f~
1--
~
00
~
,-.4
Lt')
N
.t::J
Q)
~
''0
Q)
>
(1)
CJ I
(1)
c..
~ I
00 +J
~ 0
,-.4 I s::
I..
f I
I
I
I
,
I I
I
,
I I
I
,
, I
I
I
f
I
, J
I
I
I . I
!-
.' "'~.'. .~. ._. - ...~, ---
. .
~~
OM
'OM
. .,-
H Ln .
[:
'C'·, c :' .
¡~ ~:.~::
:c.. 1.0'.::.
if ~..'\ .'
I .
. ¡
~o
M U') '.
ir;~ .
~
to·
0')
o
ï' ,
..... .
1\'
I .. .
'O~
~ ~..,..,..
I
!
.~()
I
I
I
i
¡
I
II .!
II a::
:1 ~I~
II 0 ::J
:: u: ~
/I .' <I:
:: b!
II h
II ~:
" en w
'01101-
C II U, <t
IJJ II IQ
II -.J
~ .. -g II ';=1 ~
OJ .... II 0:
ß ~ á; H 1-:
t-) Q Q..:: ¡
II CC'CC
IIUJW
" :>Q
II 0,2
II : ~
II 1-;
II en 0.:
II 0,0
H Ui
II I
II I
II .....Iw
" ZIt-
II W!LIJ
II U!..J
" Lr:rQ..
II Wi1:
:I Q.. 8
II i
U I
1\ I_
I: fš'l~
II
II CC,CC
II UJ'W
II :>iQ
II oiz
\I I :::J
If I
I: ~!~
1I~Þ-4
II :::J:I-
II aJ.Z
II 11«
II to;::)
!i ,e
" Q'>
" UJ!....
IIH.....
:: ~¡~
n ;:¡§
1\ tn!Ci
~ II wI :
UJ II
I- II .
en II....! UJ
>- II Þ-4; U
(J) "Z! .....
*' a: ~ \I :::JI æ
. UJ rti II
. to- D.. II
<r e "
t-:it 0 II
Q: U II
o > II
Q.. <r C II
Lú 3 0 "
trI.....
CD .., II
U'J ..... U "
::J :I: ::J "
t- ~ II
<1:%+0'11
t- 0 111 II
(J') I- C "
._~.I· , '~ t- æ 8 ::
; ; ~ W .0 QJ :f
P'") ..... II
0..'011
n:eclI
· I 0....2 ~ n
I ~ Z4JCII
; C c.ftí II
~ ~;: .~ 0.. II
U U II
:::;) 111 .. II
,~ Q:QlLII
t-001l
en oIJ II
Z ..., U II
OUrti"
U Ell L II
.~.... II
." : £ 8 Ii
; -.
10
-I. ;
I
.-
I:
I
~~
coO)
0--0'
~ ~
t I
crtrJ
<I:W
1:u.
I I
0'- 111
N
-0
q-
I()
I
M
·1
I
I
N
. "f '.
11
QJ
....
ftI
e
.....
....
U)
IJJ
'"
'. . ¡
, ,
'..:'.'1..1
" .. 1
~~. ~
'. I
.
, . ~ ..
I.j
'.: . .. f 6
'..1-1 u
. , 'r
- j
"1 ¡
!
,~
.;I··~
~
~
,."1' J
, f
-.1
o
"' !'
;
I-
~
Z
:::I
z
o
....
.....
~
.....
CC
U
to
W
Q
~
I~
I
o
z
I
I
I
I
I
I
, !
. I j ':
o 0 0' 0 ro 0' 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0' 0 0 0' 0
o 0 .." 1() 0 0' 0 0 O¡ 0 &t1 0: If) 0 c', 0 0 0 0 0 OJ 0
..ò 0 ò' r--: 0: ô! ò ¿. Ò' ¿ ,..: ô: M è ò; tl; ò ò' c~ IIÌ ,..:¡ iii
111 f") N, M q- C· IJ1 II:t 0; I" M 0' I" N b1 N N 0 0 I" ~j N
~ ~ I' ~ ~ :Q¡ ~ ~ ~¡ ~~. ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~: ~ ~ ~¡ ë
..0 ~ M N: ~ ~ 1'" 1"1 P1 ,.... M: I" N ¡ ~ ~ 'I ~
~ I ~ N, .."I l' q- ¡ ~ 1.-4
I Ii! : I
o 0 0' 0 0 010 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 o! 0 0 0: 0 0 0' 0
o 0 o¡ 0 0 0; 0 0 0 1f"J 0 0; If') 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0: 0
Ñ a5 o:! Ò Ö 01 1Õ Ò ò! ~ tñ Ö 0:. ~ ¿: ¿ Ö ¿ añ tñ 0' Ò
if) 0 ,....¡ 111' M.-4 ! CD N 0; CD OJ I 0 INN I lI1
'" 0'- ""'I ~; ~,.... i 0' - CD n ~ , ~ ; 111 111 ¡ 0'
M t") !..... ! \'~ M vi v ,; r') ¡ I D'
~ 0' I ¡ ¡.-4 I ..... ~ ¡ ~
I f I ! . I
I ì I I I I ,
,'I I I ¡ I
o 0 0 o·m 0: 0 0 0; 0 0 01 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 010
~ ~ U:: u: ~ ~i ~ ~ ~: ~ u: ~; ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~¡ ~
q- m 00: ...... D' c·: it) 0 0' ...... ,.... 0 q- ~ 0 if) 0 0: 111 0 ....... if)
o ,.... U1. M q- 1(') ~ M 0: ~ 00 C' OJ M 111, N N 0: ,.... If) ~ N
~ ..... I"! .-4 M CD ~ Lr.J 0--; 0' ~ 0' n M CD' M N v, 0' N ,....1 m
,......... ,...... 0' ..lJ 0 ...0 1": N N m. ...... ...0 il1, 0 ~ I ¡ 0-- 0 M ' 0"-
IJ1 M I M N! 0" ~,...., .......0........0 M. ,,~ I I ..... I
M ~ N' t t (".a~ ....; I v I ..... I ..... ¡
I f 'I Ii ,;, I I I
.... 0 0: 0 0 0-.1 m ..... 0; -() 0 m 0-- If') o! 0 0-- 0' 0 ...... 0 I q-
,t~ ~ ~¡ ~ ~. ("~j ~ r: ~¡ 0: ~ r--:¡ ~ 0: ~¡ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ':¡ ~
N 0' OJ 0 0 oj 0 ~ O!,.... 0 N; N 0 01 0 tr:t" 0: 111 0 c.! '"
N q- C " ..! 1..0 0 &11 ¡ ! 0--
..... ~ --I I ~ g 1-
o 0 01'000100 010 0 0,' 0 0 010 0 OJ 0 0 010
~ ~ ~¡ c:: ~ ~; ~ ~ c:¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~¡ ~ c: ~i ~ ~ ~'I' ~
..0 ,.... ......1 ~. q- . ~! ~ 00 oj v 0 oj to CD 111!...... ..0 O! 0-- 0 M if'
¥ ~ Mi.'771 ! ~ b? 71 E § 71 ~ ~ -J ~ -p 71 ï 7 =t ~
oooloooooo!ogdoo ooo~ooo,o
~~~¡~~~I~~~i~ .~~~~i~~~~~~I~
~ ~ '0 0 -1- ~ o¡ ~ ~J ~ N 10 ~ 01- - 01 å
o 0 0: 00 0] 0 0 J 0 :0, 0 0 J 0 0 o¡ 0 0 O· 0
,¢ II~ j ..: .¡. 01 ¿. ,¢ ö¡ ..0 Ô ..o! ~ ë ~ ,..: ..0 ¿. ô ...: M: .,;
...... q- I." ...0 "1~ .-4 ..0 ~¡ "1 if') ..-.: ~ - l' ,,.) q- N, N .... .-4, ,....
Š ~ ... -Mj N - M ï CD N ~ - I N <t! ~
o 0 0/ 0 ~o 0 0 J tn tn 01 0 0 j 0 0 01 0 0 J 0
~ ~ ~¡ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~I ('~ r-: ~! Ir~ ~ ~! ~ ~~j ~ ~ ~¡ ~
~ ~ 01...... CD O! tn If) 111,.... ~. O! 0 N 01 If) 0 Oi If') If) 0-.1 If)
q M N ~ M. D' 11'. '. M 00 001'.0; N q 0' ('-l ,.... ,~.¡; N N _
~ ~~~I<tNj ] ~T~-Itntn
~~~55~55~~~o~5~5~~55~~
J J Jj:¡j:¡j :¡jr:¡j ~ ~¡J J ~!J ~ ~:~ J J;~ ~ cñllJ
~ x! ~ ~I x
QJ Oi 0') GI 'u ei 0 I
ä CD, ~ ~ .~ oIJ ~ ~¡ CD"ti
~ ~ ~ ~I . ~ 0.. ~I 0 ~I ~ ~¡
.... .... ~ Q ! ~ LL. "0 to M 10; x > 111:
0.. CL. an an ~¡ ¿. æ ~ >¡ .... . ~ ~ m ~:
s.. L III in 1111 ~ ..J 0 ~ ::J QJ ....' ...,
III III ~ ~~ :> QI. .c. f O~~: ole
~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~",~J.~~~
3:at JtQ a.a co.. Ell '1J 1: ~ s.. · c:> . Q
..... C. L IIJ QI lit Q ...., >\ U'I
· · , : : 0 X X a.l: . .... "C ~:>{'.::t:. OJ S (!) U'I IU, rø
~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~I g ~ ~.~ Q.. ~ £ 5 OJ' ~ ct ~': .~ ~. ~ .
o~~xx~.~ · H L~ w~~ ~mw~w
3 ~~_telll~QI ~ ~~ ~
,ü.u J:>:> ~ . . ~ ~ ð"§.~ e1S ~ ~ ~.,! 2 2 5 2
.... .... IV. · .':>:> rø J- :c I.L. .J::. QI.... ~ f'Ø f'Ø j QI
o C ë: t!) to t!) ci cD ~ In ~ oJ . ~ 'I a; 6 ~ ~ ~ ú: b
~ ~ : I ~ ~ ò1 = : : ID:O.~ ~ ~ .:..~ . ~ 'ëÜ 'ëÜ ff §
N....4N.....~œ~ ¡~....~Q~5o..m~~~~u
-N~<ttn~~CD1~:lM<ttn~~CD~0-N
~ [¿j--l--l-NNN
- - - - - - = : = = ~ ~ : 2 ~ ~ = ~ ~ _ _
(~ c} C' 0 .' ()
G
(..> '.
I
I
I
I
Î
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
. ,
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
00 _I
o QJ'
.m
..0 "Ii
..... c:'
CD ....
~ fti
~~ ~
'i'5
~,
o I
M tn'
. L1
~ OJ!
è
Ill,
en
ci
to,
.c'
u'
.I
.....1
~I
~I'
~
u
~
.....
~
Q
Z
~
L.IJ
§
z:
<r!
~,
G!
01
~
5
UJ~
~~
c61
~ o
cn~
~m
~~
<r~
UJO
D
~<3J
~~
UU
<r<J:
ex:: 0:::
.........
ZZJ
00
U U,
.J...J
~~
~ß
CD,
0,
..ö'
~!
~
00,
,.~
I
o
o
o
,'~
..()
~
..0
N
00 ,
00 I
I
00 I
tA-N I
~ I
..... I
..0 I
N I
I
I
. . ¡
oIJ ..
"'401
o U)
U 0
u I ¡
c
.... L
rtj QJ
L ~
Q OJ
U'J
.;:J
.ti
~
QJ L
Ol QJ
L..,
~ 1'0
tn~
I~......
. '....... ..0
Ñ
..1
e.....
." c..
f1J E
E 0
OJU
cc
.
, an u
~L
fti QJ
co..
,:.)
~ ~ . ~ R R X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ; 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0
00
00
O~
111 ......
~
.. Q
111..,
S t'Ci
.... 0
I-
o
· l-
e
o .
WI-
CLI
...,
tCI
ClIO
~
iii .
Qr"'4
~
L e
QJ 0
"CU
L
o.
"0
.::t:. QJ
L.c.
o u
3en
.. ..
Mq-
co CD
0'-0--
..... ~
, I
u>-
W<I:
C~
I 1
~.......
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
. /j
017,
r(~/
DATE:
3/12/84
SUBJECT:
Community Development Block Grant
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: We are currently in the ninth year of funding for this grant. We
have concentrated these funds on the construction of Mackey Creek Channel. This
particular increment (ninth year) includes the relocating of a high pressure gas
line and the obtaining of several parcels of right-ot-way. After the gas line is
relocated and right-ot-way obtained it appears we will be $60,000 - $70,000 short
to complete the ninth year increment. The exact figures will be available for a
Council decision in mid-April.
By the 15th of March we are required to advise the County of our
desire to either continue the Mackey Creek Project or utilize available funds in
other areas for the tenth year program.
Richard Albin will be available Monday night to discuss the limits of
the Mackey Creek Project.
Our recommendation, at this time, is to cOntinue this project into
the tenth year.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: None
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES N/A NO
N/A
N/A
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
-I
!I
I
I
f'
I
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINE ERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
February' 29, 1984
Mr. Delton Thrasher, Program Coordinator
Tarrant County Planning Department
100 E. Weatherford St.
Fort Worth, Texas 76118
RE: 30-308, TARRANT CO./ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MACKEY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, PH. V
TRANSMITTAL OF PLANS AND SPECS.
PROJECT NO. B-83-UC-48-0001/B83-48-20
We are transmitting herewith one (1) copy of the construction plans and
specifications for the referenced 9th year Community Development Project
for your review and approval. Also enclosed is an Engineer's Estimate of
construction costs. Several permanent drainage easements and temporary
construction easements will be required for construction of this project
and these documents will be transmitted to you under separate cover.
The total estimated construction cost of this project, plus the cost of
relocating the Lone Star Gas pipeline and plus the estimated cost of
right-of-way acquisitions exceeds the,available funding of appro~imately
$100,600. We will be requesting that the City of North Richland Hills
participate in the difference in the total project cost and the $100,600
available through H.U.D. If the City of North Richland Hills has no
objection, we would recommend proceeding with the full scope project from
Onyx Drive North to Harmonson Road.
After relocation of the Lone Star Gas pipeline and your acquisition of the
drainage easements, we will establish an advertising and bidding schedule
accordin lYe Meanwhile, please call if you have any questions.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: 7Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
~ -Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
I
I-
I
:-1
-I
I
1-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
:.
J-3
KNO\NlTON-ENGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
'06LA'þ<: 1ÞQ.tII\,. ---..cw..
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
OWNER: Tarrant County/NRH JOB NO. 30-308
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Mackey Creek Channel Improvements, Phase V
2-29-84
DATE:
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM ITE~ UNIT TOTAL UNIT COST
HO. QUANTITY PRICE
Unclassified Channel Excavation 1. C.Y. 3,450 5.00 $ 17,250.00
Oenslty Controlled Compacted Channel Embk. 2. C.Y. 1,590 3.00 4,770.00-
2,000 PSI Cl ass "B" Unfo nned Cone rete fo r
Channel Llner Incl. Relnf. Steel 3. C.Y. 465 160.00 7¿~~400.00
3î' Dla. Weep Holes Incl. Fl1ter Medla 4. EACH 146 5.00 730.0cr
Remove. Reolace & Setback 6' H;qh
Chain link Fence 5. L.F. 660 9.00 5,940.00
Rpmnvp Rpnl nC~ ~ Sp In K 41 Hiah I
r.hñin I ink Fence ' 6. L. F. 120 8.00 960.00
^ " N~\..,¡ 4' Hiah Chain t ink Fence 7. L. F. 250 7.00 1,750.00
12" Oi a.. (DR-35). PVC SS Pi De
lncl. Excav Bnbd & Backfill 8. L. F. 522 30.00 15 660.00
4' nia Tvoe "A" Precast Cone. SS Manhole.
r.omnlp-te in Place 9. EACH 1 1200.00 1 200.00
SUB- TOT At . ... . . .. ... ... ............... ...... ...... ........... ........ $122.660.00
1611 Gas line Relocation (Bv Lone Star Gas) L.S. 1 35,000 $ 35,000.00
r'" -II ',... nrn;nnoe r- Acou;~it;on Cost S. F. 38.140 0.50 19.070.00
TI ~II /I ..... r- AcolJic;ition Cost S F 21.330 0.20 A~266 00
v " H
-
,
d-1on nnr nn
REVIEWED & APPROVED: SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST - ---
.:~~ PLUS -.
m
PROJ.ECT MANAGER TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $180,996.00
. .
'"I ~".
'. ,
,... J.!r"'
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called the meeting to order February 27,
1984, at 7:30 p.m.
2.
Present:
Jim Ramsey
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
J.C. Hubbard
Jim Kenna
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Ginny Pierce
Mike McEntire
Richard Albin
Gene Riddle
Lou Spiegle
John Whitney
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Acting City Secretary
Acting City Attorney
City Engineer
Director Public Works-
Utility
Finance Director
Purchasing Agent
Planning & Zoning Commission:
Marjorie Nash
Press:
Mark England
Catherine Woodard
David Doremus
Absent:
Dick Faram
Harold Newman
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
3.
Mid Cities Daily News
Fort Worth Star Telegram
Northeast Chronicle
Mayor
Councilman
City Secretary
City Attorney
The invocation was given by Councilman Davis.
4.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
to approve the minutes of the February 6, 1984 emergency
meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
5.
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve the minutes of the February 13, 1984 meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
l'
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
EMERGENCY MEETING
FEBRUARY 6, 1984
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 13, 1984
APPROVED
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
6. Councilman Davis removed item #38 from the Consent Agenda.
7. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
8. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that Mayor Faram would like to
appoint Mr. Lyle Welch to the Civil Service Commission.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher to
approve Mr. Lyle Welch to the Civil Service Commission.
Motion carried 5-0.
*9.
10. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Mr. John Cook, 4901 Pebble Court, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Cook stated that he was the owner of this tract of land
and he would like to ask the Council to grant this zoning.
Councilman Davis stated that it should be recorded that the
Council did receive a letter of opposition from Mr. Charles
Mangham.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey
closed the public hearing.
February 27, 1984
Page 2
CONSIDERATION OF
REMOVING ITEM (S)
FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF to
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM
(S) INDICATED BY
ASTERISK (#9, 14, 25,
33, 34, 35 36, & 39)
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
APPOINTMENTS TO
BOARDS AND
COMMISSIONS
APPROVED
PLANNING AND ZONING -
PS 83-128,
RECONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF MARTIN
DEVELOPMENT FOR FINAL
PLAT OF LOT 18,
BLOCK 1, MEADOW RIDGE
ESTATES, PHASE 2
(LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF RUFE SNOW
DRIVE ACROSS FROM
NORTH RICHLAND JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING - PZ
84-2, REQUEST OF JOHN
COOK TO REZONE TRACT
2A, L.C. WALKER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT
1652, FROM
AGRICULTURE AND
INDUSTRIAL TO
R-3-SINGLE FAMILY
(LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF CARDINAL
LANE, BOUNDED ON THE
WEST BY SUNNY MEADOWS
ADDITION AND ON THE
EAST BY MANGHAM
AIRPORT)
I-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
11. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard to
approve Ordinance No. 1090.
Motion carried 5-0.
12. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey opened the Public Hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Ms. Marsha Hill, tenant of the property, appeared before the
Council.
Ms. Hill stated that she was requesting that the plat be
zoned commercial so that she could put in an accelerated
learning center. Ms. Hill stated that she had a set of
plans if anyone would like to see them.
Councilman Kenna asked Ms. Hill if she had a learning center
there now.
Ms. Hill stated yes.
Councilman Kenna asked if she wanted to expand the present
learning center.
Ms. Hill stated that she did.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to the request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey
closed the public hearing.
13. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna to
approve Ordinance No. 1091.
Motion carried 5-0.
*14.
February 27, 1984
Page 3
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-2
ORDINANCE NO. 1090
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 84-3, REQUEST OF
CARL POWELL TO REZONE
TRACTS 10 & lOB,
J.C. McCOMAS SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1040, FROM
AGRICULTURE -
SPECIFIC USE TO
C-1-COMMERCIAL
(LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
SMITH FIELD ROAD AND
CHAPMAN)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-3
ORDINANCE NO. 1091
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-3, REQUEST OF
CARL POWELL FOR SHORT
FORM PLAT OF LOT 1,
BLOCK 26, FOX HOLLOW
ADDITION (LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF SMITHFIELD ROAD
AND CHAPMAN ROAD)
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
;1
I
I
Ie
I
I
15. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Mr. Marvin Smith, 7609 Douglas Lane, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Smith stated that he was buying this property from his
father, Lucian Smith, for development. Mr. Smith stated that
he had platted 7 lots on Cimarron Drive on the east side of
the street and this basically would be the same type of
zoning as was presently in the area. Mr. Smith stated
the only difference would be in block 4. The corner lot would
have a duplex, as it would adjoin duplexes. Mr. Smith stated
that they would require a garage instead of a carport.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to the request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey
closed the public hearing.
16. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to
approve Ordinance No. 1092.
Motion carried 5-0.
17. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Mr. Marvin Smith, 7609 Douglas Lane, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Smith stated that he was developing this property for
his father, Lucian Smith. Mr. Smith stated that they were
requesting a duplex be put on the corner lot, as there were
duplexes to the west of this lot. Mr. Smith re-stated that
a garage would be required instead of a carport.
Councilman Davis asked if this zoning was approved, would
there be any problem in requiring a stipulation that a
covered garage be a part of that zoning.
Mr. Smith stated that he would not be opposed, however he
would rather hold it to a one car garage to prevent difficulty
in finding a plan that would fit that lot.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to the request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey
closed the public hearing.
Motion carried 5-0.
February 27, 1984
Page 4
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 84-4, REQUEST OF
LUCIAN SMITH TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 2, JOHN CONDRA
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 311,
FROM AGRICULTURE TO
R-2-SINGLE FAMILY
(LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF DOUGLAS LANE,
BOUNDED ON THE WEST
BY MAROAKS ADDITION
AND ON THE SOUTH BY
WINDCREST ADDITION)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-4
ORDINANCE NO. 1092
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 84-5, REQUEST OF
LUCIAN SMITH TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 2, JOHN CONDRA
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 311,
FROM AGRICULTURE TO
R-D-5-DUPLEX (LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
DOUGLAS LANE J BOUNDED
ON THE WEST BY
MAROAKS ADDITION, AND
ON THE SOUTH BY
WINDREST ADDITION)
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
18.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna to
approve Ordinance No. 1093 with the stipulation that at
least a one car garage be on that plat. Councilman Davis
stated that he felt that the future homeowners in that ,area
needed to be protected and Mr. Smith was not in opposition
to this.
19.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Bob Price, 1713 Chisolm Lane, Euless, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Price stated that he was an engineer for the firm of
Teague NaIl & Perkins, which was the firm representing Mr. Bill
Flories. Mr. Price stated that the current zoning of the
property was Agricultural and the request was to change to C-1.
Mr. Price stated that the property boards Smithfield Elementary
on the west and the present development plans were to build a
retail shopping center with an anchor store and smaller
perimeter shops. Mr. Price stated that no development plans
had been conceived at the present time.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to the request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey
closed the public hearing.
20.
Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Davis to
approve Ordinance No. 1094.
Motion carried 5-0.
21.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Mr. Emory Bellard" Jr., 968 Simpson Terrace, Bedford, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Bellard stated that this request was a positive and
compatible addition to the area.
Councilman Kenna asked what the side yards would have - a
fence or just a 20 foot yard, and what was planned for the
yard that faced Glenview.
Mr. Bellard stated that there were no specific plans at this
time.
Councilman Davis asked how many lots were on this ~ract of land.
February 27, 1984
Page 5
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ
84-5.
ORDINANCE NO. 1092
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 84-7, REQUEST OF
BILL FLORIES TO
REZONE TRACTS IB &
3B, J.M. CROCKETT
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 273,
FROM AGRICULTURE TO
C-I-COMMERCIAL
(LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF DAVIS
BOULEVARD AND BOUNDED
ON THE WEST BY
SMITHFIELD ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-7
ORDINANCE NO. 1094
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 84-8, REQUEST OF
EMORY BELLARD TO
REZONE TRACTS 2B5,
2CI, 2C2 & 2C4, M.
LYNCH SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 953, FROM
IF-7 TO
R4-SD-SEPARATE
OWNERSHIP DUPLEXES
(LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF GLENVIEW
DRIVE AND
APPROXIMATELY 120
FEET WEST OF JACKIE
LEE STREET)
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Mr. Bellard stated there were 29 duplexes or 58 townhouse lots.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey
closed the public hearing.
22. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to
approve Ordinance No. 1095.
Councilman Davis stated that as he recalled this piece of
property came up for a zoning change to commercial before and
it was denied. Councilman Davis stated that it would be
better suited for commercial and asked the chair to ask the
applicant why it was previously denied.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that it was not pertinent and
that the applicant had come forward in good faith.
Motion carried 5-0.
23. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak on this to please come forward.
Mr. Charles Rutledge, 6409 Sunnybrook, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Rutledge stated that he was asking for commercial on this
property. That the property to the north was zoned commercial,
to the west multi-family, and residential behind. Mr. Rutledge
stated that he thought the commercial building would fit in
well. Mr. Rutledge stated that it would be a brick building.
Councilman Kenna asked what type of business was planned.
Mr. Rutledge stated that it would be five office buildings,
most of which would have inside storage.
Councilman Davis stated that the Planning and Zoning minutes
stated that he was going to tear down the two small houses that
were presently on the property and he wanted it recorded that
this would definitely be an improvement.
Mr. Rutledge stated that the two houses would be removed.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey
closed the public hearing.
February 27, 1984
Page 6
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-8
ORDINANCE NO. 1095
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 84-9, REQUEST OF
CHARLES D. RUTLEDGE
TO REZONE TRACT 12C,
S. RICHARDSON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1266, FROM
AGRICULTURE TO
C-2-COMMERCIAL
(LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF
DAVIS BOULEVARD AND
RUMFIELD ROAD)
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
24. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna to
approve Ordinance No. 1096.
Motion carried 5-0.
*25.
26. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Mr. Charles W. Evans, attorney, 729 Bedford Euless Rd.,
Hurst, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Evans stated that he representing Mid City Pizza
Corporation and they were asking that a special use permit be
granted for the sale of alcoholic beverages.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked if Mr. Dan Cole was the name that
would be on the permit.
Mr. Evans stated that was correct.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey
closed the public hearing.
27. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to
approve Ordinance No. 1097.
Motion carried 5-0.
28. Mr. Charles Evans, 729 Bedford Euless Road, representing
Mr. Bud Austin, appeared before the Councit.
Mr. Evans stated that a problem arose in complying with the
City Engineer's Comments to receive letters from all the
down-stream property owners, as far as water was concerned,
regarding the property that Mr. Austin was developing.
Mr. Evans stated that there were three letters required, and
that Mr. Austin had received one. Mr. Evans stated that
one of the other property owners was Mr. Roy Davis, an
February 27, 1984
Page 7
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-9
ORDINANCE NO. 1096
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-5, REQUEST OF
CHARLES D. RUTLEDGE
FOR SHORT FORM PLAT
OF LOT 2, BLOCK 13,
MEADOWVIEW ESTATES
(LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF
DAVIS BOULEVARD AND
RUMFIELD ROAD)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 84-10, REQUEST OF
MID CITY PIZZA
CORPORATION TO REZONE
LOT 1, BLOCK 10, SNOW
HEIGHTS NORTH
ADDITION FROM
C-1-COMMERCIAL TO
C-I-SPECIFIC USE SALE
OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (LOCATED AT
THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE
AND MEADOW CREST
DRIVE)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORD INANCE FOR
PZ 84-10
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF
ENGINEERS' COMMENTS
CONCERNING KINGSWOOD
ESTATES PHASE III
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
attorney who owned 12 acres to the west, and they were very
close to reaching an agreement with him. Mr. Evans stated
that they were going to have to build a fence, put in a water-
line, clean up the property and build a pad for a barn, etc.,
but they were about to settle and should have an agreement
shortly. Mr. Evans stated that the property which was
presenting the greatest problem was a 72 acre tract which
was directly to the west of this property. Mr. Evans stated
that the property was owned by the Continental National Bank
Trust Department. Mr. Evans stated that the Trust Depart-
ment's Attorney, Mr. Walter Cook, and he had discussed the
problem of receiving a letter. Mr. Evans stated that at the
present time the problem was that they are in the process of
selling the property and had it under contract of sale and
did not want to give a letter of approval. Mr. Evans stated
that the Bank did not want to go to the prospective owners
as it would appear there was a problem. Mr. Evans stated
that they could go one of two ways. Mr. Austin stood ready
to give the City a hold harmless letter so that the City
would not be responsible for any damages, or the City
Council could waive one of the two letter requirements. Mr.
Evans stated that Mr. Austin would like to get on with his
development. He had a tremendous amount of money involved,
his engineering was done, he had his interim money borrowed
and would like to proceed with the development. Mr. Evans
stated that Mr. Austin needed to get his plat filed.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked if the main thing was to put in
the water and sewer line.
Mr. Evans stated that they wanted to get the water, sewer,
streets and curbing in.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that the recommendation of the
Staff was for them to submit a hold harmless letter to the
City and allow them to proceed up to the point of putting in
the water and sewer lines.
Mr. Evans stated they would issue a hold harmless letter and
bring the two letters in as soon as possible.
Mr. Line stated that the letters should be given to the
Public Works Director. However, just so there was no
misunderstanding, this would allow them to go ahead with the
water and sewer improvement, but not the street and drainage
improvements. Mr. Line stated that putting in the street
and drainage improvements would divert the water onto the
property before obtaining a letter stating that it was
alright with the property owner. Mr. Line stated that he
didn't feel there was anyway Mr. Evans or his client could
indemnify the City against possible law suits that might
occur if water is diverted from this property onto someone
February 27, 1984
Page 8
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
else's property without consent. Mr. Line stated his
understanding was that the hold harless letter would protect
the City from any action in the future from his client. Mr.
Line stated that if they permitted them to go ahead with the
water and sewer and for some reason they didn't get the
letter they would be able to put the water on to someone
else's property. Mr. Line asked if this was correct.
Mr. Evans stated that they were prepared to hold the City
harmless from any damages that may occur in the future from
that property owner. Mr. Evans stated that he didn't know
how long it would take for a contract of sale to go through.
Walter Cook had indicated it would take approximately 90
days.
Mr. Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, 1615 Precinct Line Road,
Hurst, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Long stated that he was requested by Mr. Evans to
generate facts about the number of acres that were involved,
regarding the discharging of water. Mr. Long stated that on
the one piece of property, where the 12 acres was involved,
they were dumping approximately 4 acres of drainage into
that area, that it would take a ditch six inches deep and
thirty feet wide, so there was not a major water discharge
concentration. Mr. Long stated that on the other property,
the CNB Trust Department, that there was approximately 3.8
acres and it also could take the same type of ditch, that
there would be approximately the same water that was going
onto the property. Mr. Long stated that if Mr. Austin could
only put in the water and sewer, that would not be
accomplishing anything because that only takes 30-45 days.
Mr. Long stated that Mr. Austin would need to cut his
streets first before putting in the water and sewer. Mr.
Long stated that he, Mr. Evans and his client would like to
state that they didn't feel that the water would create any
damage.
Councilman Davis asked how many lots were in this sub-
division.
Mr. Long stated 97.
Councilman Davis stated that they had received one letter
and were close to receiving another. Would it be agreeable
that his client only rough-cut the street within 100 feet
of their property line to prevent dumping any water?
Councilman Davis stated this would allow them to go ahead
with their water and sewer, give them approximately 45 days
and then if additional time was needed they could come
before the Council again in 60 days. Councilman Davis
stated that, even though it was in good faith, he had some
concern.
February 27, 1984
Page 9
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Evans stated that he and his client would be happy to
cut the street within 100 feet of the other property line.
Councilman Kenna asked if there were any houses on the 72
acres that anyone was concerned about.
Mr. Evans stated that there was one house on the 72 acres,
on the opposite end of the property, that was being sold for
development property and they want to meet with their street
and go on. Mr. Evans stated they could cut the street to
grade and there would not be as much water discharged.
However, this would not be best thing for the down-stream
property owners because they would have to match the street.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mike McEntire if the hold harm-
less letter would protect the City.
Mr. McEntire stated that if Mr. Evans would put in enough
stipulations it would probably suffice.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve the request with the stipulation the developer be
allowed to cut all the streets, except the two in question
and cut only half of those, to construct all the water and
sewer lines within the subdivision and if at that point and
time they did not have permission from the downstream owner,
come back before the Council with the reason permission was
denied, determine what action could be taken and submit the
hold harmless letter to the City before any construction
began.
Motion carried 5-0.
29. Mr. Clyde Womack, and Mr. Jake Murrah, Peat, Harwick, Mitchell
and Co., appeared before the Council.
Mr. Womack stated that they were here to formally present the
results of the 1982-83 Annual Audit. Mr. Womack stated that
from a stand point of the City Council and City Management,
the important thing, as far as the accounting reports were
concerned, was what the CPA's referred to as a clean opinion
of the Standard Accountant's Report. Mr. Womack stated that
they did not have any qualifications or exceptions. Mr.
Womack stated that the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
for this year was something the Council could be proud of,
as the goal of the City was to obtain the certificate of
conformance from the Municipal Finance Officers Association
and they believed this report has all the qualifications and
should receive this certificate. Mr. Womack stated in
receiving this certificate the City would be one of just a
few cities in the United States that had this excellence in
reporting. Mr. Womack stated that the
February 27, 1984
Page 10
PRESENTATION OF
1982-83 COMPREHENSIVI
ANNUAL FINANCIAL
REPORT AND MANAGEMEN~
LETTER
APPROVED
I-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I 30.
I
Ie
I
City's Finance Department worked very hard to put together a
lot of these numbers and the Council could see that there is
a lot of expanded financial schedules. Mr. Womack stated
the City worked, strived and had continued to improve the
internal controls and accounting procedures the past year.
Councilman Davis asked if the majority of the recommendation
that were made last year had been addressed.
Mr. Womack stated that if the Council would compare the
amount of comments this year versus last year they would be
able to see that the number of recommendations had been
reduced. Mr. Womack stated that there was always things
that could be improved, but the City was doing all that they
could with the personnel they have, to try to continue to
improve the controls, and some of the comments they had come
up with were from more of an ideal standpoint. The City
management would have to determine what is practical.
Councilman Fisher asked what the excellence in reporting
actually meant.
Mr. Womack stated that the procedure was to apply with the
Municipal Finance Officers Association and to send five
copies of the report to them and it would go through a
review procedure. Mr. Womack stated this meant that the
organization's goal has been to improve and strives to have
the upmost reporting of city government and municipalities
and therefore any outsider (bonding rating companies, etc.)
would look at this report and see that according to the
standards set by the governmental body it was at the top of
its class. Mr. Womack stated that it was something to be
truly proud of. According to the number of cities in the
United States there are not very many that have this.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey thanked Mr. Womack and Mr. Murrah.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve the report from Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co.
Councilman Davis stated that he would like to thank the
Finance Director, on behalf of the Council, for doing an
outstanding job and stated that it was professionally done
and she should be commended.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis to
postpone this item until the next regular City Council Meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
February 27, 1984
Page 11
CONSIDERATION OF 1984
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
/
./
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
31. Mr. Line stated that Flory Street was badly in need of
improvement and the Staff's recommendation was to seek
authorization to proceed with the administrative work prior
to the improvement being done. Mr. Line stated that it was
specifically recommended that a benefit hearing date be set
for April 9th, and the Staff be authorized to send out the
assessment paving notices prior to the benefit hearing.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to
authorize the Staff to prepare for a public hearing date of
April 9th, 1984.
Motion carried 5-0.
32. Mr. Line stated this was a proposed paving of three streets
that are badly in need of improvement Parchman, Scruggs, and
Cross Streets in the Calloway Acres Addition at an estimated
cost of six hundred thousand dollars. Mr. Line stated that
the Staff was requesting authority to proceed with preparations
for the benefit hearing, which was proposed to be established
for April 23, 1984.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
authorize the Staff to prepare for a benefit hearing date of
April 23, 1984.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Council Hubbard to
amended the motion to include the transfer of $145,500 from
unspecified projects to the Calloway Acres.
Motion carried 5-0.
*33.
*34.
February 27, 1984
Page 12
CONSIDERATION OF
FLORY STREET PAVING &
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED - SET FOR
APRIL 9, 1984
CONSIDERATION OF
CALLOWAY ACRES STREET
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED - SET
APRIL 23, 1984
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE #12, FINAL,
TO AUSTIN ROAD
COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT
OF $67,084.32 - SNOW
HEIGHTS STREET AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE HI, TO
PANHANDLE
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$89,028.70 - DENTON
HIGHWAY WATER SYSTEM
EXTENSIONS
APPROVED
I-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
*35.
*36.
*37.
38. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that this ordinance corrected the
Zoning Map on the tracts of land that were discussed in a Pre-
Council Meeting before the last City Council Meeting. Several
parcels of land that were previously zoned commercial needed
to be changed from C-2 to C-1 in order to change the Zoning
Map.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Ordinance No. 1098.
Councilman Davis ask for clarification of the change.
Mr. Line stated that what was on the map was the closest
possible zoning to the old commercial zoning.
*39.
40. Ms. Diane Martin~ 1808 Chattanooga, Bedford, appeared before
the Council.
Ms. Martin stated that she had appeared before the Planning
and Zoning Meeting on Thursday regarding the ordinance that
stated there was a ceiling on child care facilities of 75.
MS. Martin stated that she was concerned about what steps
could be taken to have an amendment to this ordinance and was
told to appear at this Council Meeting and speak with the
City Attorney. MS. Martin stated that apparently there was a
stipulation as to whether or not they were a private school
and an educational facility.
Councilman Davis stated that he would like to clarify what
MS. Martin was saying because he had attended that meeting.
Councilman Davis stated that the intention of the ordinance
February 27, 1984
Page 13
CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR HOT MIX ASPHALT
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR MOTOR FUELS
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR ONE K.W.
EMERGENCY GENERATOR
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE CORRECTING
THE ZONING MAP
ORDINANCE NO. 1098
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING
THE MICRO-FILMING OF
VARIOUS CITY RECORDS
ORDINANCE NO. 1099
APPROVED
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
I-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
when written was to limit the attendance to 75 students,
because the majority of day care centers are located in
residential areas, and trying to limit that number was to try
to limit the traffic for those areas. Councilman Davis
stated that Ms. Martin's property was located in a commercial
area and this was not addressed in the Ordinance. Councilman
Davis stated that there was concern about the classification
of this center because they did not have benefit of legal
counsel. They advised her to come before the Council for an
interpretation. Councilman Davis stated that Mr. McEntire
might want to check into their curriculum. Ms. Martin did
want to buy the property and start building, but they weren't
sure if she fit under private school and if not possibly go
back in and amend the Ordinance so that if a day care
facility is located in a commercial area then it might not
need the ceiling of 75 students.
MS. Martin stated that was correct and asked what the next
'step would be to get an amendment to the ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that the next step would probably
be to get Mr. Line to meet with Mr. McEntire and then see
what options were available.
Councilman Kenna stated that if the ordinance was not broad
enough with respect to a private school versus a day care
center then that could be a subject for the Council to reopen
that section of the Zoning Ordinance for study.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that if it did not fall within
the present Zoning Ordinance then the Council would have to
bring the Planning and Zoning Commission back into it to
amend or change the ordinance.
Councilman Davis stated that if the City Attorney felt
Ms. Martin did fit under a private school, under the
ordinance as written, then Ms. Martin would not have a
problem. Councilman Davis suggested Ms. Martin meet with
Mr. Line.
Councilman Kenna asked Ms. Martin the number of children she
proposed.
Ms. Martin stated 120.
Mr. Ernest Hedgcoth, Consultant Civil Engineer, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Hedgcoth stated that he was present with Mr. Huggins,
representing Gene Huggins Hondo Dealership, and that the
Council graciously granted zoning. Mr. Hedgcoth stated that
since that time Mr. Huggins had a little architectural change
and wanted the Council to be aware of it. Mr. Hedgcoth
stated that Mr. Soloman Peterson would show the new
rendition.
February 27, 1984
Page 14
I'
I
Ie
1
1
I
I
I
1
I_
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
--
I
Mr. Soloman Peterson, of Crown, Rich and Associates,
Dallas, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Peterson stated that this was basically a fairly minor
change. The only change was in the character of the
showroom. Mr. Peterson stated that they were upgrading the
showroom and showed a rendition to the Council and explained
the changes.
Councilman Fisher stated he was concerned somewhat because
the Council approved the concept and now was seeing something
different and wondered how the neighbors would feel when they
saw that building.
Mr. Peterson stated that they were certainly willing to
go back and talk to them and canvass the neighborhood. Mr.
Peterson stated the reason they appeared tonight was to bring
the issue before the Council and see what their comments
were.
Councilman Davis stated he agreed with Councilman Fisher and
felt that the change in the roof made it look like a
dealership and felt the Council was misled. Councilman Davis
stated that it may not have made a difference in the way he
voted but it was different than what they had seen at the
last Council meeting. Councilman Davis stated that he was
appreciative in their being open, but thought the homeowners
would also want to know the changes.
Mr. Peterson stated that they were not trying to mislead
anyone and that was the reason for appearing tonight, to
bring the issue up for conversation.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated they had the zoning, that it was
a moral commitment, and they would have to live within the
ordinance.
Mr. Peterson stated that they planned to live within the
ordinance and the civic commitments that were made.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that he appreciated their coming
before the Council and informing them of the changes.
Councilman Fisher stated he agreed with Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey
and thank Mr. Peterson for showing the Council the changes.
41. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey adjourned the meeting of February 27,
1984.
ATTEST:
Mayor Pro Tem
Acting City Secretary
February 27, 1984
Page 15
ADJOURNMENT
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
City of X8rth Richland Hills~ Texas
TO:
Rodger Line
City Manager
DATE: March 8, 1984
FROM: Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Platting Cases to be heard by City Council 3/12/84
PS 83-117
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of Gene Huggins for
replat of Block 42C-R,
Richland Terrace Addition.
PS 84-14
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of TLB-GSC Enterprises
for final plat of Lot 5, Block
B, and Block C, College Hill
Addition.
PS 84-17
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of Burk Collins
Investments for final plat of
Lot 3, Block 50, Nor'East
Addition.
PS 84-18
APPROVED
Request of Gulf Oil Corp. and
Cambridge Companies for replat
of Blocks 2R & 4R, Snow
Heights North Addition.
PS 84-20
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of Sueann Flory for
final plat of Lot 8, Block 1,
Mollie B. Collins Addition.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
7
DATE: March 8, 1984
SUBJECT:
PS 83-117 Replat of Block 42C-R, Richland Terrace Addition
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This property is located at the northeast corner of Northeast Loop 820
Service Road and Cloyce Drive. This is the property where the proposed Honda Dealership
plans to bu i1d .
All corrections have been made to the plat.
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied this plat on November 17th, 1983 because they
had denied the zoning on this property. After an appeal hearing, the City Council
approved the zoning so they asked for a reconsideration of the rep1at on February 23, 1984.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the replat subject to the
Eng ineer 's comments.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Auurova1 or denial of reD1at.
BUDGETED ITEM: YES
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
NO
x
~J1-, (!~
Ie
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF THE
OF JANUARY 26, 198
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
FEBRUARY 23, 1984 - 7:30 P. M.
CONSID TION OF THE MINUTES
RUARY 2, 1984
1.
PS 83-117
DENIED BY P & Z 11/17/83
PS 83-117
APPROVED
The meeting was called to orde
Chairman, George Tucker, at :35
PRESENT:
Chairman
Secretary
Members
George Tucker
Marjorie Nash
Don Bowen
Mark Wood
John Schwinger
ncilman
sst. Director PW/U
p & Z Coordinator
Richard Davis
Allen Bronstad
Wanda Calvert
ABSENT:
Mark Hannon
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Ms. Nash and the
motion carried 5-0.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the
motion carried 5-0.
Request of Gene Huggins for
reconsideration of the replat of Block
42C-R, Richland Terrace Addition.
Chairman Tucker stated they had turned
this plat down because they denied the
zoning, but the City Council approved
the zoning and they need to reconsider
the replat.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 83-117 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
,
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I .""-
·1
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ta
I
Page 17
P & Z Minutes (
November 17, 1983
17. PS 83-117
PS 83-117
DENIED
18. PZ 83-67
(
This motion died for lack of a
Mr. Hannon made the motion to
PZ 83-66 subject to insta ng an 8
foot masonry fence 0 e north and
east sides and sect to the approval
of a sight 1 ting system which would
have th rect lights into the
pro ty and away from the residential
roperty. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood. The vote was 2-3 with Nash,
Bowen, and Tucker voting against. The
motion failed.
Ms. Nash made the motion to deny
PZ 83-66. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion to deny
carried by a vote of 3-2 with Wood and
Hannon voting against denial.
Request of Gene Huggins for replat of
Block 42C-R, Richland Terrace
Addition.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to deny
PS 83-117. This motion was seconded
by Ms. Nash and the motion carried
5-0.
Request of Robert H. Martin to rezone
Tract AlA, J. C. McComas Survey,
Abstract 1040, from its present
classification of Agriculture a
proposed classification 0 -12-1800
One Family Dwelling. is property is
located at 7600 H tt Street.
Chairman cker opened the Public
Hear and called for those wishing
speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer,
came forward to represent Mr. Martin.
He said Mr. Martin requested a
building permit to enlarge his home
and found it had not been zoned nor
platted. Mr. Hedgcoth said they are
requesting zoning compatible to the
surrounding area.
,
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
(
(
ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers
PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING
November 16, 1983
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
RE: PS-83-117 Replat Block 42C-R
Richland Terrace Addition
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
This will acknowledge the receipt of the engineers November 9, 1983
letter of comments concerning the replat for Block 42CR Richland
Terrace. The following are referenced in order of the engineer's
letter:
1. The OWner's Acknowledgement and Dedication statement has been
executed and notarized.
2. The Owner's phone numbers have been placed on the plat.
3. The description of the water easement has been placed on the
plat.
4. The acreage has been placed on the plat.
5. The City staff has contacted the utility companies.
6. Iron pins are placed at all corners.
7. The Texas Highway Department has issued necessary permits.
8. The surrounding property has been placed on the plat.
If you need any additional information please contact me. Your coopera-
tion is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
. ---(""'''' /
'~;ÞÜ¿1T- ~~¿'//;:5/
Ernest Hedgco~, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
235 Livestock Exchange Building · 131 East Exchange Avenue . Fort Worth, Texas 76106 . 817-625-5504
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ttt
I
...
I
(
K NOWL TON-E NG LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
November 9, 1983
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-800, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
RICHLAND TERRACE ADN., B~~~K ~~C-R,
REPLAT, PS 83-117, GRID 131,132
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat.
2. The telephone number of the Owner/Developer should be noted on the
plat.
3. A metes and bounds description including bearings and distances of
the water line easement should be noted on the plat.
4. The subdivision acreage should be noted on the plat.
5. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in
accordance with standard City procedures.
6. In accordance with County requirements, property corner
monumentation should be noted on the plat.
7. Written permission should be obtained from the State Highway
Department for any proposed construction within the I.H. 820
right-of-way along the frontage of this development.
8. All contiguous platting and/or ownership should be shown on the
plat. Existing lot lines in the adjacent subdivision on the east
side of this development should be shown on the plat.
November 9, 1983
PS 83-117
PAGE
1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG-. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367
,
I,
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
(
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
November 9, 1983
PS 83-117
PAGE
2
I
. _ SUBJECT:
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
""
f
DATE:
March 7, 1984
~
PS 84-14 College Hills Plat
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: We do not have on site construction plans for this plat as required by
the Subdivision Ordinance. We do not have the corrections called for in Richard
Albin's review letters. Part of this subdivision is still shown to be in a
flood area. I suggest you ask Dick Perkins, who is the engineer on this project,
to comply with Richard Albin's comments and then come back for reconsideration of
this plat after the plat and plans have been corrected to comply. Recommend you
deny.this plat.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove plat of case PS 84-14.
BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO
ACCOUNT N~ N~
I'
I
-_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
,"'1fIF" '
DATE: March 8, 1984
SUBJECT:
PS 84-14 Final Plat of Lot 5, Block B, and Block C, College Hill Addition.
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This is located at the northwest corner of Holiday Lane and
Bo art Street and runs behind Fort Worth Christian School.
The did not submit water and sewer 1ans for this property. The owner said he is not
sure what he can ut on this he be allow to wait to submit the
water and sewer lans until ·ust before obtaining a building permit.
There was a mixup between the owner and our tax office which showed de1iquent taxes on
the property. This has been cleared up and all taxes are paid.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final plat subject to the
Engineer's comments and with the stipulation that no building permits are issued until
the water and sewer is in and that all taxes and assessments are paid prior to going to
the City Council.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Aeprova1 or denial of final plat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
N/A
NO
x
~~..&~
I'
e-I
I
I
AG
I
AG
R-3-
1500
I'
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
February 23, 1984
2. PS 84-14
(
(
Request of TBL-GSC Enterprises for
final plat of Lot 5, Block B, and
Block C, College Hill Addition.
Dick Perkins with Teague, NaIl and
Perkins, came forward to represent
Mr. Theron Bonham with TBL-GSC.
Chairman Tucker said he understands
from the City Staff that delinquent
taxes are due on this property and
due to Council Policy, the Commission
cannot approve this plat.
Mr. Perkins said he felt sure his
client would be glad to pay the taxes
and requested the Commission hear and
approve the plat subject to the taxes
being paid prior to going to council.
Councilman Davis said he felt Mr.
Bonham would pay the taxes and
although it is a Council policy, he
asked the Commission to consider the
plat and he would take the
responsibility.
Mr. Perkins said he had visited with
the City Engineer, Richard Albin,
about not submitting on-site water and
sewer plans because his client is not
sure what he can do on this property.
He said when a developer comes in to
develop this piece of property, he
will submit his plans for the water
and sewer. Mr. Perkins said they have
done this previously in Industrial
zoning on Rufe Snow.
Mr. Perkins said they had submitted
the final plat. the paving. and the
water and sewer plans in Holiday Lane.
He said the water and sewer within the
property and the drainage along the
railroad would come later.
Mr. Perkins said when he first talked
to Mr. Albin, he agreed to allow them
to do that, but now he says it does
not meet the city ordinance.
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I_
I
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
February 23, 1984
(
(
Mr. Perkins said Mr. Bonham got the
backing of the neighbors to build a
channel to alleviate the flooding of
the Fort Worth Christian school and
Bogart Street. He said he obtained a
current Corp of Engineers study from
Mr. Albin which shows none of this
area in the Flood Plane if he leaves
it the way it is now, but Mr. Bonham
has agreed to go ahead and build the
channel. Mr. Perkins said Mr. Bonham
plans to cut a channel along the
railroad to divert the water into the
existing channel.
Mr. Perkins said he knows this is a
very unusual request, but they request
the Commission approve this plat with
the stipulation they get with Mr.
Albin and the City Staff and finalize
the plans prior to obtaining a
building permit.
Mr. Perkins said the project would
have a private sewer, but the fire
hydrants would need to be shown so
they would need to have a replat for
the water at a later date.
Councilman Davis asked the Commission
1f they had any problem with approving
this plat with these stipulations.
Chairman Tucker said he did not see
any problem with it. He said they
have no problems with the other
comments from the City Engineer.
Theron Bonham came forward. He said
he felt there was a mix-up in the city
tax office; he said he thinks he can
furnish receipts where he has already
paid the taxes on this property. Mr.
Bonham said he would get it all
straight tomorrow.
I'
I
I_
I
I
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
February 23, 1984
,-
\
(
PS 84-14
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 84-14 subject to the Engineer's
comments and with the stipulation that
no building permits are issued until
the water and sewer is in and that all
taxes and assessments are paid prior
to going to the City Council. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger
and the motion carried 5-0.
I
I
3. PS 84-16
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for preliminary plat of Lot 3, Block
50, Nor'East Addition.
I
I
,_
I
4.
PS 84-17
Request of Burk Collins Investme
for final plat of Lot 3, Block
Nor'East Addition.
Delbert Stembridge with
Associates, came forwa
Mr. Collins. He sta ed they had
received the City gineer's comments
and take no exc tion to them.
I
Mr. Stembri e' said his client was
told by t Director of Public Works
that th property was already
plat so Mr. Collins purchased the
pr erty, but when he applied for a
ilding permit, he found it had
not been platted. Mr. Stembridge
said they have been rushing to get the
plans ready and since his client has
already invested so much money, they
request approval of these plats.
I
I
I
Mr. Wood asked how long ago was it
that Mr. Collins was told this
property was platted.
I
I
I_
I
Mr. Stembridge said he was not sure
but it was after the deadline for
filing the plats.
Councilman Davis asked if they plan to
discharge the storm water to Lola
Drive.
Mr. Stembridge said they plan to build
the storm drain down Palomar to Susan
Lee.
I'
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
(
(
817 336-5773
H~ !l}~C:l!~ T 1'fp:~L AI'ff! GP'ENRfí!1'f~
February 21, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: College Hills Addition
Lot 5, Block Band C
Dear Commission Members:
We are in receipt of your engineer's letters of February 15
and 17, 1984 relative to the review of the subject
subdivision.
We are in basic agreement with the request of your engineer;
however, we would respectfully request that the items related
to on-site drainage, water, and sewer not be required as a
condition of the platting. Our client is certainly willing
to comply with this request; however, he does not yet have a
finalized site plan for the multi-family development on this
property. He has been placed in a situation with his lender
in which he must have the property platted prior to making
final arrangements for the site plan.
Therefore, we
subdivision be
engineer with
letters.
would
made
those
request that your approval of this
contingent upon our satisfying your
comments he has made in both of these
We will be present with our client at your February 23, 1984,
meeting to give you further information regarding this
situation. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
We look forward to your favorable approval.
Very truly yours,
TEAGUE NALL AND
JRP/rdk
Perkins, P.E.
cc: Mr. Theron Bonham
210 West 6th Street, Suite 600
Executive Plaza Building
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
I'
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
~
(
KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
February 17, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-8041 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
COLLEGE HILL ADDN., LOT 5, BK. B & C,
UTIL. AND STORM DR. PLANS, PS 84-14, GRID 95
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. See our letter dated February 15, 1984, regarding requirements for
submittal of drainage plans to F.E.M.A. for approval of channel
improvements on the Calloway Branch Channel which passes through
this development.
2. A note is included on sheet 5 of the plans which states that onsite
drainage area (A-2) will be addressed when plans are submitted for
Block ICI improvements. Since Block ICI is part of this proposed
platting request, then the additional drainage plans should be
submitted for review at this time before consideration of plat
approval.
3. The existing zoning for this development should be noted on the plat
( R-7 -MF) .
4. A 25-foot setback lines should be provided along both the front and
rear of Blocks Band C, (see p. 69 Zone Ord.).
5. All construction plan sheets should be signed and sealed by a
Registered Professional Engineer.
6. See our review letter dated May 18, 1983, regarding prorata, fire
hydrant coverage, and other drainage considerations not addressed on
the final plans submitted for our review.
February 17, 1984
PS 84-14
PAGE
1
!S!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-621'· METRO/267-3367
I'
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
(
\,
(
Please call if you have any questions.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
February 17, 1984
PS 84-14
PAGE
2
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
(;
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
February 15, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-804~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
COLLE E HILL ADDN., LOT 5, BK. B & C,
FINAL PLANS, PS 84-14, GRID 95
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. As shown on the new Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps prepared
by the Corps of Engineers, a significant portion of the referenced
plat lies within the F.I.A. designated 100-year Floodplain. We do
not know if the proposed Calloway Branch Channel improvements
located within this property have been considered by the Corps in
their delineation of the lOO-year Floodplain. In any event,
insufficient downstream channel or culvert capacity could cause
backwater effects impacting this plat and thus precluding the
development of an unspecified portion of this platting. Mr. John
Gerrity with the Corps of Engineers should be contacted regarding
flooding potential in this vicinity.
If channel improvements are proposed which would reduce the 100-year
flood plain limits on this property, then plans for such
improvements should be submitted to the F.E.M.A. for review and
approval. In accordance with its Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance,
the City may approve construction of proposed channel improvements
subject to submittal and review of data prepared by the Developer's
Engineer to the City and F.E.M.A.
Concurrent construction of channel improvements and issuance of
building permits may be accomplished with F.E.M.A.ls approval. That
agency will issue an amendment to the Floodplain Map or a letter of
Conditional Map Amendment only after approved completion of channel
improvements which can be shown to reduce the floodplain limits on
the subject property.
Planning materials should be set to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, State and Local Programs and Support, Natural Hazard
Division, Engineering Branch, Washington, D.C., 20472. Phone
1-202-287-0230.
February 15, 1984
PS 84-14
PAGE
1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267..33fJ7
I'
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
(
(
2. The materials submitted to our office for review include only the
proposed final plat and paving construction plans. Drainage and
utility construction plans should also be submitted and reviewed
before consideration of approval.
3. Please see our review letter of the Preliminary Plans for this
development dated May 18, 1984, regarding items not addressed by the
Developer1s Engineer or covered in the final plans.
4. A number of clerical items need to be corrected -- please see the
attached check list prepared by the City Staff.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
plea 0 ~not heSi~O
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
February 15, 1984
2
PS 84-14
PAGE
,:: ._~. '.. . .-.. -'~J\I~"6 "VA.,.. ......_.. _..__.~< ~.,~. r~
I '../ Prepared by K( lton-English!..F1owers. Inc.. tt ~ulting Eng.
- PRELIMINARY PlANS.~ FINAL PLANS, RE-PLAT
lIs check list is to be used only as a supplemental guideline for subdivision reVh
The Developer should consult the following sources for a complete explanation of tit
development policies, procedures, and requirements:
IIA. Subdivision Ordinance
B. Zoning Ordinance and Map
1 C. Water and Sewer Policies
D. Council Policies
E. Water and Sewer Master Plan
I REFERENCE
I A.l-04. D.4
I
.1
A.1-03, E.4
A.I-03,oD.13
1 +1-03, D.
1-03. 0.1
.1-03. D.2
I A.I-03, D.3
A.l-D3, 0.4
A.I-03, D.4
I A.1-03, D.S
A.I-03, D.6
A.I-03, D.7
I A.l-03. D.8
A.I-D3. D.9
1 D. COUNCIL
A.I-D3. D.l1
A.I-03, D.12
II 8.
I
I
S.XI-
B.XII
S.XIII
B.XIV
8.XV
B.XVII
B.XVIII
1-. XIX
.XX
B.VIII
I
A.I-0S. A
A.I-0S. B
A.I-04. A
F.
G.
H.
I.
Thoroughfare Master Plan
Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
FIA Flood Insurance Study and Rate Ma~
Other City Authorized Sources
DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENTS
PLAT
REMARKS
P -1 U CYr -S I t'... kJ €,b
P-Z ND
P-3 ÅJ Ð
P-4 Y €S
P-5 ~~
Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedications
Surveyor's Certificate
Engineer's Certificate
Commission and Council Endorsements'(Final Plat)
Complete Construction Plans
Part of preliminary plat finaled within one year
and all of plat finaled within three years
Preliminary layout of entire area to be subsequently
subdivided P-7
Plat proper size and scale P-8
Names and addresses of Owner, Engineer, Surveyor, etc. P-9
Proper subdivision name P-IO
Contiguous ownership and/or platting P-l1
Metes and bounds of subdivision boundary .. P-12
Vicinity map" ·"P~13
Commission Endorsement block "(pre1. plat) P-14
Subdivision acreage shown p-15
Show existing streets, easements, lots. structures.
watercourses, etc.
. Location and dimensions of proposed streets,'ease-
ments, drainage., etc.
Date. scale and north arrow
Zoning should be shown on plat
Lots and blocks numbered
Building setback lines
MINIMUM lOT REQUIREMENT
ZONING WIDTH DEPTH AREA SETBACK
AG 150· 200· , TAt. 50·
I-F-15 90 110 15,000 S.F. 30
I-F-12 80 110 12.000 30
I-F-9 70 110 9.500 25
I-F-8 60 100 8.000 25
2-F-9 70 100 9.000 25
MF 70 100 25
NR 100 25
lR 100 25
PD requires topo. buildings layout, site plan.
parking layout, landscaping plan, etc. P-31
Property fully owned consent of all owners for replat P-32
Advise all utilities of re-plat P-33
No lots fragmented in re-platting to size below
minimum for applicable zoning
P-6
, .
yG*s
y~~
-5
~
--s
i¿S
I
P-16 '16.5
P-17 ~S r ~
~:~~ ~~ ltJD1S\~
])-20 ~ b"S
P-21 JJD
P-22
P-23
P-24
1>-2~
P-26
P-27
p-~~
P-29
P-JU
~
P-34
I·...~..~' '·~T ." ~;_,':::r"';'~~t:.^'~""""" ~~,..' , . "I ~_:~" ;;',~~" "~"~:, "!t;;.~,:ri'~i.", ......:." ' " '::.... .....~'- :i.\':.}~"~"'''::'' ¡", ~..,
, ·,_..:.l!ú......1r;¡::.\~:,:;~.~_:'_ ," ,"V'.. ..'
~. · U··
, . )- J _u....J.v.. ......-.. -..-
I .J Prepared by Kn( ton-English-nowers. Inc.. Cor-'lting Engineers
PRELIMINARY PLANS. FINAl PLANS. RE-PLAT
I~s check list is to be used only as a supplemental guideJine for subdivision review.
The Developer should consult the following sources for a complete explanation of City
development policies. procedures. and requirements:
JI A. Subdivision ~rdinance F. Thoroughfare ~~ster Plan
. B. Zoning Ordinance and Map G. Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
I C. Water and Sewer policies H. FIA Flood Insurance Study and Rate Hap
D. Council Policies I. Other City Authorized Sources
E. Water and Sewer Master Plan
I REFERENCE
I A.I-03. A.
A.l-03. 0.10
I
A.I-03. D.14
I A.2-05. A
... A.2-05. B.1
I ~.2-05. B.18
~.2-05. B.17
I G.5.1-4( 4)
G.5.2-2(3)
I G.4.3-4(1)
I
I
I
I -G.5.2-1
t A.2-05. B.12
I
G.l.4(1)
G.l.4(2)
G.l.4(3l
G.I.4(4)
G.l.4(5)
H.4.2
A.2-05. B.13
A.2-0S. B.15
I.AES
. eA.2-05, B.3
I A.2-05. B.4
A.2-0S. 8.5
A.2-0S. B.7
A.2-05, 8.8
A.2-05, 8.9
I
DESCRIPTION OF REQUIRÐ~ENTS
DRAINAGE
PLANS
Drainage study by registered engineer
On-site and off-site topography with appropriate
contour interval and engineer's seal and certifi-
cation of topography and drainage study accuracy
Drainage criteria and calculations
Proper runoff computation method
Proper runoff coefficients
Proper times of concentration
Proper design stonn frequency
Proper accomodation of off-site drainage through
development
Downstream channelization a~d easement requirements
100 year flood data required on plans for developments
with at least 50 lots or 5 acres ·
Engineer's Certification of Compliance with "Flood
Damage Prevention Ordinance- on Plans
Alteration or relocation of watercourse requires
notification of Texas Department of Water Resouces
and Federal Insurance Administration .
Control of flood damage due to increased velocities
or erosion
Flood damage protection measures
Controlled alteration of natural flood plains
Controlled filling. grading, dredging
Divers10n of flood waters by encroachment or
obstructions
Encroachment within floodway fringe allowed or max.
I-foot increase in 100 year flood
Structures min. of IS-inches above 100 year flood
Proper structure for discharge from street to open
channel
Concrete channel lining requirements
Adequate drainage channel easement width
Potential maintenance and operational problems
Spread of water in residential streets below top of
curb
One clear lane in collector streets
Two clear lanes in thoroughfares
S-year UQderground stQrm sewer system required when
spread Ilmlts exceeded
Overland swale required for 25-year discharge
Proper number and size of inlets
RÐ~ARKS
D-1 AiD 36AL
D-2
0-3
D-4
0-5
0-6
D-7
NO
y~
D-8
D-9
D-10
0':11 NO
0-12
D-13
D-14
D-lb
D-16
0-17
D-18
0-19
D-20
t 0-21
0-22
0-23
0-24
D-~~
D-26
0-27
D-28
D-29
I'
...-... ':-..:.~_M~"'!"!\·.ñf,..-..~.
. ,"_ ..... ;)UDUj'¡.)IUI' f\C.'¡L" ""L'-" .....&J.
I ..J pr~pared by Kr( 'ton-Engl ish-.F1ow:rs. Inc., C« ,,1 ting Engineers
e · PRELIHINARY PLANS. FINAl PLANS. RE-PLAT
I This check list is to be used only as a suppl~~ental guideline for subdivision review.
The Developer should consult the following sources for a cn~plete explanation of City
development policies, procedures. and requirements:
~I A. Subdivision Ordinance
B. Zoning Ordinance and Hap
I C. Water and Sewer Policies
D. Council policies
E. Water and Sewer Master Plan
I REFERENCE
I E.
·C.-VI. . A.3
I C.VI. E.2
I C.V. E.
C.II, 1.1
, C.II, 1.2
I~.II. 1.3
_.VII, B.1
I C.VlI, 8.2
I C.VII, 8.4
I C · VII. 8 · 5
I
I
C.VII. C.7
I C.VII. C.ll
I C.II. R.
C.JV. B.3
I e:: ~:~~: :
A.2-03, C
C.VII, 8.3
C.VII. 8.6
A.2-02. A
A.2-02. 8
C.II, P.
I.AS
I.SG
C.VII, C.l3
I
A.2-03, D
A.2-03. E
A.2-03. F
,~ ····IIIIIIiIICI_~..!!'.'\·--*I.~~.. ".- 0"'# . ...:>~.. ~ "."':"/þ:'~_-4~',- ....:...:. '''!._:''Y'!'~.:~'.." -' ~ .... ~"""'''''~ . ,.I -" 'fII-
;"'., :~'''''''''.~~'''''. .7.:...,....«....
r
.~ ~~.,......_.....
F.
G.
H.
I.
Thoroughfare·Master Plan
Flood Damage Prevention Ordin~nce
FIA Flood Insurance Study and Rate Map
Other City Authorized Sources
DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENTS
WATER
AND
P l A N S
SEW E R
Confonnity with Water & Sewer Master Plan
City participation in water or sewer oversizing
in·dicated
Water or sewer pro rata along property line
installed by City
Pro rata for two or more lines based on longest
line only .
No structure over existing water or sewer line
Relocation of existing utility indicated
Easements provided for utility relocations
Water and sewer in compliance with AWWA Specs,
City specs, Texas Dept. of Health
Proper type and locatio~t and adequate number of
gate valves .
Full platted area should be provided with fire
hydrant coverage .
All fire hydrants must have cut off valve and be on
6-inch min. line
4-inch water lines: looped 20 customers max.,
1000 feet long max.. deadend 4 customers max.
All water lines 0.1 or PVC only
Proper water system supply rates and pressures
Water lines extend to borders of subdivision
Water system within service area limits
Avoid double water services on easements
12-inch water lines in industrial areas and min.
8-inch in apartment areas for fire protection
All sewer lines D.I, PVC or. vitrified clay
Min. sewer size 6-inches except service lines
4-inch min.
Top manhole cone IS-inches below finished grade
with brick or grade rings used to level
No sewer service unless water service also available
Percolation tests required for septic system
Criteria for septic systems must be met
Sewer system designed to serve full drainage area
Proper population equivalent and infiltration con-
sidered in sewer system design
Extend sewers to borders of subdivision
Economic study required for lift stations
No drainage and sewerage cross-connections
Re'ARKS
W/S-l
W/S-2
W/S-3
\~/S-4
W/S-5 µo
'~/S-6 ~o
\~lS-7 ,,~
W/S-8 ~JJ 0
_. _~/.S-9 y¡;s
'~/S-IO JJöT ~N-¡;-
W/5-11JJðT S~O\kJJJ
W/S-12
W/5-13
W 5-14
W 5-15
W S-16
W/S-l
y~s
}Jb
W/S-18
~ IS-19
6S
V6'S
W/S-20 Y bS
W/S-21 ..:)J.~
\-l/S-22 ~O€-S'T")D,J
\~LS-23 AJJ.1J
~J/S-24 }J! Þ\
'~I S - 2 5 C>lJ EST-, D1\J
~J/S-26
W/S-27 Àlpï ""ÞoNG'
W/5-28 ~J ¡4
g7~-~~ AJ ()
I:" :
I
4IÞ PRELIMINARY PLANS. FINAL PL~S. RE-PLAT
I· This check list is to be used only as a supplemental guideline for subdivision review.
The Developer should consult the following sources for a complete explanation of City
development polic~es. procedures. and requirements: .
",I A. Subdivision Ordinance
B. Zoning Ordinance and Map
I c. ~Iater and Sewer Pol icies
D. Council Policies
E. Water ~nd Sewer Master Plan
I REFERENCE
I F."
I A.2-D4. A.1
A.2-04. A.2
A.2-04. A.3
I D.CPNO.6
. "t, .'. '. .
. .
~
I D. R. 79-28
.AES
I.AES .
I A.2-05. 8.16
A.I-03. E.2
J . n~L
I
I
I
I
I . Tl·'L
I . TML
I . ll-iL
I. THL
A.I-01. D.7
A.2-04. A
A.2-0S. B.2
A.2-0S. 8.10
A.2-0S. 8.11
A.2-04~ B .
I · A.2-04. C
A.2-04. D
I
,14IÞ
I
-...-.-... .'- .-..--....,.-
.. - - ~ .---............ - --..-..,..~..., .... - ---~......_..4-,..~,:·~.~..'.;;ÌlI.........! ..~_.~- . ~
,.
¡~......:~.'..'
:., .:-h,~.,.J¡ ."".::;,:...a...:......-,. _·~«..t,_~>_- ¡ ...' "'.,
\
CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS.
( SUBDIVISION REVIEW CHECK llS(
Prepared by Knowlton-English-Flowers. Inc.. Consulting Engineers
Page 1
F.
G.
H.
I.
thoroughfare Þ~ster Plan
Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
FIA Flood Insurance Study and Rate Map
Other City Authorized Sources
DESCRIPTION OF REQUIRÐ~ENTS
REJ.1ARK5
STREET
PLANS
Confonnity with Thoroughfare Master Plan
Ci.ty partie; pation in res ide~ti al areas for streets
greater than 36' 8-8
Street oversizing required, no City participation
Street oversizing required, City participation
indicated
Developers along State maintained highways must
pay for curb and gutter and drainage
Assessments for curb. gutter. paving and drainage
Special penmit requirements for railroad, State.
pipeline and other rights-af-way encroachment 5-7
Street name conflicts 5-8
Bridges required on streets crossing channels 5-9
Confonmity with accepted engineering practices 5-10
Consider indirect street routes through sub- ·
division to connect bordering arterials S-11
PrQvide street access to adjacent undeveloped propertyS-12
Suggest staggered intersections not less than 100 feetS-13
limit. intersection skew to 7S degrees ,5-14
Hin. cul-de-sac radius 45-feet to curb 5-15
.. Distance between intersections shall not exceed
1000 feet
Residential streets min. 31' B-B
Curb height max. is S"
Proper street grades
Valley gutters
Proper street pavement thickness
Subgrade tests to City Engineer
Proper subgrade treatment
5-1
YËS
kiD
~YES
µO
S-2
5-3
5-4
5-5
S-6
N/~
S-16
S-17
5-18
5-19
5-20
5-21
S-22
S-23
I· ·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
( (
((
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
May 18, 1983
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-804, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
COLLEGE HILL ADDNÑÃ LOT 5, BLOCKS B AND C~
PS 83-48, PRELIM! RY PLAT, GRID 95
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1. The existing zoning (MF) should be noted on the plat.
2. A 25-foot building setback line should be shown on the plat along each
side of Holiday Lane.
3. The Subdivison Ordinance requires that the width of drainage easement
provided exceed the width of the top of channel by at least 20 feet as
required for channel access and maintenance. The proposed 25 foot wide
easement along the west line of Block C should thus be increased to 45
feet. The Public Works Department may, however, agree to waive this
requirement if the Developer provides an ingress-egress easement to the
channel at some point on Block C and constructs a concrete channel access
ramp to permit Public Works vehicles to enter the channel for maintenance
operations.
4. Concrete riprap extension or rock rubble should be provided at the con-
fluence of the main Calloway Branch Channel (Area A-I) and side tributary
(Area A-2) in the vicinity of the railroad trestles to help protect the
railroad structures against erosion. Also, plans for any work done on
or near the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad right-of-way should be
approved by the railroad company and written evidence of such approval
provided to the City.
5. We would request that the hydraulic grade line of the proposed 39-inch
RCP from the Calloway Branch Channel to Holiday Lane be shown on the final
plans to confirm that the proposed storm drain size is sufficient to handle
at least a 5-year discharge. Also, adequate overland relief capacity should
be provided over the storm drain to handle at least a 25-year frequency
stonn.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-8211. METRO/267-33fS7
I '.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
'I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
,
(
Page 2, Planning & Zoning Commission, May 18, 1983
6. The Developer should be required to construct street improvements to
City Standards in Holiday lane from Bogart at least to the north line
of lot 5. Block B. We would further suggest that the Developer escrow
his share of a future street extension on Holiday lane north of lot 5.
Block B. along the remaining frontage of Block C. or sign a covenant
running with the land agreeing to participate in future curb and gutter.
paving. and drainage construction on Holiday lane in accordance with
the City's Street Assessment Policy.
7. Adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been provided for the
entire platted area based on the 30D-foot radius criteria for MF zoning.
Additional water line extensions and fire hydrant installations in Block
C will be required.
8. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the existing
21-inch sanitary sewer which crosses Block C. We would estimate pro rata
at $11.00 per linear foot for an equivalent 8-inch line for a total length
of approximately 400 feet.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision.
please do not hesitate to call.
RICHARD W.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE: March 8, 1984
9
SUBJECT:
PS 84-l7 Final Plat of Lot 3, Block 50, Nor'East Addition
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard, bounded on
the west by Roberta Drive, and on the north by Lola Drive.
erty with the understanding that it was already platted. When
he found out it had not been platted.
he a lied for a buildin
There was a uestion about where they planned to discharge the storm water and they said
they would build the storm drain down Palomar to Susan Lee.
They agreed to the Engineer's comments.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final plat subject to
the Engineer's comments being corrected prior to going to the City Council.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial of final plat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
N/A
NO
x
~~ {?~
1-'
R-3
I-I
,.-
,
I
"
,
,
.
I
,
,
,
\
\
\
,
"
,.
"
/
#'
I'
I
I
I
Ie
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
February 23, 1984
(
(
I
made the
s ct to the Engineer's
co and with the stipulation that
no building permits are issued until
the water and sewer is in and that all
taxes and assessments are paid prior
to going to the City Council. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger
and the motion carried 5-0.
------------
I
PS 84-14
APPROVED
I
---- --- -- --"---".--'. -.-.----...-------..--.--..----..... ---...---....- .---....--...- --"
3.
PS 84-16
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for preliminary plat of Lot 3, Block
50, Nor'East Addition.
I
I
4.
PS 84-17
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for final plat of Lot 3, Block 50,
Nor'East Addition.
I
Delbert Stembridge with Stembridge and
Associates, came forward to represent
Mr. Collins. He stated they had
received the City Engineer's comments
and take no exception to them.
~e
I
I
Mr. Stembridge said his client was
told by the Director of Public Works
that this property was already
platted so Mr. Collins purchased the
property, but when he applied for a
building permit, he found it had
not been platted. Mr. Stembridge
said they have been rushing to get the
plans ready and since his client has
already invested so much money, they
request approval of these plats.
I
I
Mr. Wood asked how long ago was it
that Mr. Collins was told this
property was platted.
I
I
I
Ie
II
Mr. Stembridge said he was not sure
but it was after the deadline for
filing the plats.
Councilman Davis asked if they plan to
discharge the storm water to Lola
Drive.
Mr. Stembridge said they plan to build
the storm drain down Palomar to Susan
Lee.
I'
I_
I
Page 5
P & Z Minutes
February 23, 1984
(
I
Mr. Wood said he felt the Commission
should try not to delay Mr. Collins
and felt they should act on both the
preliminary and final plat.
I
I
I
Chairman Tucker said he had no problem
with the preliminary plat, but would
want a stipulation on the final that
all be corrected prior to going to the
City Council.
Councilman Davis said he agreed with
Mr. Wood; he does not feel it was any
fault of Mr. Collins and also, he has
agreed to all the Engineer's comments.
I
I
p_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
PS 84-16
APPROVED
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-16 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0.
PS 84-17
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 84-17 subject to the Engineer's
comments being corrected prior to
going to the City Council. This
motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion carried 5-0.
5.
PS 84-18
Request of Gulf Oil and Cambridge
Companies for replat of Blocks
4R, Snow Heights North Add
PS 84-18
APPROVED
Ms. Nash made the approve
PS 84-18 sub to the Engineer's
comments his motion was seconded by
en and the motion carried 5-0.
6.
PS 84-19
Request of Sueann Flory for
preliminary plat of Lot 8, Block 1,
Mollie B. Collins Addition.
~~
~/
~/
.~....-
MS. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-19 subject to the Engineer's
comments with the exception of items 1
and 3. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0.
I·
Ie
I
I
I //
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
(
KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
March 7, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-927, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
NOR'EAST ADDN., LOT 3, BLOCK 50,
SITE IMPROVEMENTS PLANS, PS 84-16,17, GRID 114
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. The developer has agreed to construct a storm drain line in Palomar
Drive which will discharge runoff from this development underground
to the existing storm drain line in Susan Lee Drive, as we
requested. The proposed pavement replacement consists of an 8-inch
thick 2:27 concrete cap with a 2-;nch HMAC surface course. We have
no objection to this plan.
2. The developer has made all other revisions requested in our review
letters dated February 9, 1984, and February 23, 1984. We would
remind you of our comments regarding pro rata in our February 9
1 etter.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
ple e do not hesitate to call.
,...
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
March 7, 1984
PS 84-16,17
PAGE
1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367
n-_
~ - c:......:r- x
I r ~:- -
I .:'
f· ~
-- c~
\J\
y.
~ ~
C> c::..
..) ~"
~
'-"6 .: -~.
o-t<" c .
o r -:L
~ ó o· ,
~..) . .
'-J .
I
x
:2 0.1 [
CD .
~
--4
I.D I~
.j-. q
x~
I
I
-0 [
- ----
-
r
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
/
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
February 23, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-927, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
NOR'EAST ADDN., LOT 3, BLOCK 50,
REVISED DRAINAGE PLANS, PS 84-16,17, GRID 114
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. We would refer you to our comments regarding storm drainage
requirements for this development in our letter dated February 9,
1984.
2. The developer is proposing to discharge stormwater from a portion of
his development area by diverting stormwater northward into Lola
Drive through a proposed new underground storm drain; however, most
of this drainage area presently drains southwestward into Roberta
Drive. The existing storm drain in Lola was not designed to handle
the drainage area included in this development, therefore, we do not
believe that the existing 42-inch storm drain line in Lola has
sufficient capacity to handle this additional drainage area. The
storm drain line in Susan Lee, just south of the intersection of
Palomar Drive, a 54-inch pipe, was designed to include runoff from
the development area south of Lola and west of Davis Blvd. This is
the reason why we recommended in our Feb. 9 letter that the runoff
from this development be taken underground in a new storm drain down
either Palomar Drive or Sybil Drive to Susan lee where the existing
storm drain has sufficient capacity to handle the drainage area
south of Lola and west of Davis Blvd.
3. We understand that the intersection of Lola Drive and Greenwood Way,
where the developer is proposing to tie his storm drain into the
exsiting system, has been observed to be subject to frequent
flooding. If this is the case then this proposed new tie-in would
probably increase local flooding in the area. We would recommend in
any event that the storm drain in Lola be inspected and cleaned if
silt or other obstructions have diminished the storm drain capacity
in thi s a rea.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this
February 23, 1984
PS 84-16,17
PAGE
1
!SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
(
please do not hesitate to call.
~~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
February 23, 1984
PS 84-16,17
PAGE
.
2
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
>1
I
--
I
(
(
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
February 9, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-927, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
NOR'EAST ADDN., LOT 3, BLOCK 50,
PREL. & FINAL PLANS, PS 84-16,17, GRID 114
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. The computed stormwater discharge from this property onto Roberta
Drive, as presented on the preliminary plat, appears to exceed the
capacity of the street in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance
criteria. The nearest underground stonm drain in the area is
located on Susan Lee, as shown on the attached storm sewer map. We
would recommend that the developer be required to extend an
underground storm drain line from Susan Lee in either Palomar Drive
or Sybil Drive to the Southwest corner of this development.
2. Finished contours should be shown on the Site Grading Plan which
reflect topographic changes resulting from fill material brought to
the project site. Also the drainage plan should be revised if the
fill material will change the surface runoff flow patterns.
3. Easements should be provided for all the water meters 'ocat~d on
private property.
4. Fire hydrant coverage should be shown on the water layout plan based
on 300-foot radius criteria.
5. The a-inch water line connection on Davis Blvd. should be made to
the existing 12-inch line on the east side of Davis Blvd. rather
than the 6-inch line on the west side. A bore in lieu of open cut
will be required across Davis Blvd., and a permit from the State
Highway Dept. will be required.
6. The developer should be required to p~ his prorata share of the
existing 6-;nch water line in Lola Drive and the existing 12-inch
line in Davis Blvd. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear
foot for one-half of the 6-inch line in Lola for a total length of
306 feet; and $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of an equivalent
February 9, 1984 PS 84-16,17 PAGE 1
S50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-8211 . METRO/267-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
. ~
(
8-inch line in Davis Blvd. for a total length of 207 feet.
7. A building setback line should be provided on Lola Drive and on
Roberta Drive in accordance with the requirements for Comnercial or
C-2 Zoning. A building setback line on Davis may also be required.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please 0 ot hesitate to call.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line. City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler. Engineering Technician
February 9. 1984
PS 84-16.17
PAGE
2
o
I ) U) I\D I
600 , . (1. " --.J /
.-- ¡:J. ( .
_ .__ ~x
~
d
~
LO
)(
__, _ tD
t:,."/~,, ~ .~\ "" ~
~~. F c?
I
Dil C
L-
, ~
~.
¡
x
:2 O!
CD
Lt)
~
~ [
~-
::,s
_I 1_ · ï ·
I t
~I
LPO:
- -, ,
,,0/
¡-'N
x
.;' 0 [
)( ê::P
~
¡o0=
.--
~--
I I
t
\t.?
~
CD
U")
,.
/'
I
I
IÓ
.r
DATE: March 8. 1984
. _SUBJECT:
I
I
PS 84-18
Replat of Blocks 2R & 4R, Snow Heights North Addition
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This property is at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Northeast
I
I
looP 820 Service Road.
The reason for this rep1at was Gulf needed more property to allow them a carwash.
I
The a reed to the En ineer's comments and all corrections have been made. They will
I
I
obtain written permission from the State Highway Department before any construction is
begun within the Interstate Highway 820 right-of-way.
I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this replat subject to the
e Engineer's comments.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
re
I
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial of replat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
x
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
~/~ev
(J~
R-7-MF
~I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 5
P & Z Minutes
February 23, 1984
Mr. Wood said he felt the Commission
should try not to delay Mr. Colli
and felt they should act on bo the
preliminary and final plat.
Chairman Tucker said no problem
with the prelimin plat, but would
want a stipula on on the final that
all be corr ed prior to going to the
City Cou 1.
PS 84-16
APPROVED
cilman Davis said he agreed with
Wood; he does not feel it was any
fault of Mr. Collins and also, he has
agreed to all the Engineer's comments.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-16 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 84-17 subject to the Engineer's
comments being corrected prior to
going to the City Council. This
motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion carried 5-0.
5. PS 84-18
Request of Gulf Oil and Cambridge
Companies for replat of Blocks 2R and
4R, Snow Heights North Addition.
PS 84-18
APPROVED
MS. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-18 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
6. PS 84-19
Request of Sueann Flory for
preliminary plat of Lot
Mollie B. Colli tion.
PS 84-19
APPROVED
made the motion to approve
subject to the Engineer's
comments with the exception of items 1
and 3. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
,I
~'
(
(
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
February 22, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop ,820
North Richalnd Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Blocks 2R & 4R, SNOW,HEIGHTS
NORTH ADDITION, Replat, PS
84-18.
In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated February
15, 1984, we offer the following comments:
1. The Owner's Ackrtowled~ement and Dedication Statement
and Notary Certificat10n have been fully executed.
2. A vicinity map has been added to the plat.
3. All easements requested by the utility companies have
been added to the plat.
4. The correct zoning has been shown on the plat.
5. Written permission will be obtained from the State
,Highway Department before any construction is begun
within the I.H. 820 right-of-way.
If there should be any further questions regarding this matter,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
DRSlet
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
'Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler ,,-.Engineering Technician
,':,.:,·5~' '. .
~j;','
.~ '.
'.. . ..-, ,. .~. .
>: ! :: > ~~ - .. "<~ '. ~
. ;...
; , , 'r ~:0' . ':.)-' . ';"
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
February 15, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
SNOW HEIGHTS N. ADDN., BLOCKS 2R & 4R,
REPLAT, PS 84-18, GRID 121
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. The Owner1s Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat.
2. A small scale vicinity map should be included on the plat showing
the general location of the development.
3. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in
accordance with standard City procedures.
4. The zoning noted on block 2R should be changed from LR to C-2.
5. Written permission should be obtained from the State Highway
Department for any proposed construction within the I.H. 820
right-of-way along the frontage of this development.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
pleas not hesitate to call
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
February 15, 1984
PS 84-18
PAGE
1
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
I · - '
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
o
Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer
TESCO Region Engr. Mgr.
P.O. Box 970
Fort Worth, TX 76101
RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-18
Snow Heights North Addition, Blocks 2R & 4R
Address or Location: Northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and
Northeast Loop 820 Frontage Road
Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the
proposed· layout in terms of the requirements of your office.
Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning
Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland
Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than 2/8/84.
Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office.
,¿/"
Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor
corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments)
Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made.
(See Comments)
COMMENTS:
.s- FOOT Et~SEMENT FOR ElECTRIC
DISTRIBUTION FACJLITIES, AS SHOWN
ON THE ATTACHED SKETCH.,
TESCO:
d-.-<ó-8<f
SIGNATUR~( ~
C? ~~: /) (=
I
DATE
CITY:
-&J~J.- G~
DATE: February 1, 1984
SIGNATURE
I'
I
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
/1
DATE: March 8, 1984
SUBJECT:
PS 84-20 Final plat of Lot 8. Block 1. Mollie B. Collins Addition
DEPARTMENT: Plannin2 and Zonin2
BACKGROUND: This property is located on the north side of Odell Street and approximatel V
225 feet west of Smithfield Road.
There was a question regarding fire coverage for this lot. but they say there is a fire
hydrant within 220 feet of the southeast corner of this lot.
They agree to pay the pro rata share of the water line~ but there will be no pro rata
for the street as it is already constructed.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final plat subject to
the Engineer's comments with the exception of items 1 & 3.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of final plat..
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
N/A
x
NO
~~(}~
/~
r
,/
/
/
,/
AG
ER
AG
·~~~..~' ,-:. -";:.:·~~~b::iJ~::"';;,.;.;·- ",ê~~·~'.~: *,~~#~_ ~.~. -. ~t·,:,·,,~?iY~t¡.\...~~,'~~~:~~,;e..~_:-:-;~;~~ .-;~,~:~··.;,,~:~<··:I:'~· ~;-., '- ~;,~~~,¡,.;·o;1f·r,i;.,;~. ::;r~:·-, /" ~---~' ..",;.,-~~;~. ':~"'t ..
I
I
-e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
1<_
I
Page 6
P & Z Minutes
February 23, 1984
7. PS 84-20
PS 84-20
APPROVED
8. PZ 84-11
. ~.
Request of Sueann Flory for final plat
of Lot 8, Block 1, Mollie B. Collins
Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 84-20 subject to the Engineer's
comments with the exception of items 1
and 3. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Southland Corporation to
rezone a portion of Lot 1, Block 13,
Snow Heights North Addition, from
present classification of C-2
(Commercial) to a proposed
classification of C-2-Specif c
Sale of Beer for off-prem e
consumption. This prop ty is located
at the southeast coar r of Rufe Snow
Drive and Lewis Dri
Chairman Tucker pened the Public
Hearing and led for those wishing
to speak i favor of this request to
please c e forward.
Davi Olschwanger with Southland
Co oration came forward. He said
ey have four stores in North
Richland Hills and plan to build this
one at Rufe Snow and Lewis. He showed
pictures of the proposed structure.
Chairman Tucker said if this Specific
Use permit is granted, they will need
an individual's name from Southland
Corporation to put the Specific Use
in.
Mr. Olschwanger said they had rather
have it in the corporation's name.
Chairman Tucker said it was the City
Council policy to put it in an
individual's name.
Mr. Olschwanger said he would check
and have a name prior to going to the
City Council.
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;1
I
I
I
I
~·,..~~.:yy...::.,'1f~1;.-r;\";''''..._ ~ ~"'-""'-, ~"'~:. ',"...~;,:~.'~.: "14"'-
-' ,",:,~;UI;¡c., <~.,~, ~~,"!'. ",~~1" ~r; ;
, c ",_, ,..'".
Consulting
~(6
NGINEEAING, INC.
t"
. )
·r
(
")
./
Lend Planning, Surveying and Design
February 22, 1984
Planning and Zoning commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: MOLLIE B. COLLINS ADDITION, LOT 8, BLOCK 1
PS 84-19,20
Dear Sirs:
The following is in response to the City's Engineers letter.
dated February 15, 1984.
Item 1. There is a fire hydrant at the southwest corner of
Odell street and Smithfield Road. The fire hydrant is
within 220 feet of the southeast corner of the lot. The
total lot is within a 500 feet radius of this hydrant.
Item 2. The owner agrees to pay her prorata share of the 6
inch water line if the plat is approved.
Item 3. Odell Street has been constructed by the previous
owners of this property, therefore we feel the owner should
not be required to pay for additional improvements on Odell
Street.
If any other items need to be answered conserning this plat
please let me know.
Respectfully,
-7~~.
~~w. V~~~;~E.
Registered Professional Engineer
1500 N. Norwood Dr.
Blvd. B. Suite 201
Hurst, TX 76053
Phone 268-4306
I
~_~'~'~~.l-:-L;Zëtl:>-i~l:;~~"~~~~:~:!:~"-~,, _~~., "'~'-:""'~' ·1:~<~:,.: ~)::;~'., .:~;.,. '-·.J:;&:,rt'~~~",-~':¡~~.~~";~:.f.i:;'Ir>~_".' #-:(~~~~:·~_..~""N.~,·.·-_,-_ :1""'«-.""'- . :#.<'.;; . -~"~.~':~:' " .'::;";-;)Í:!>;' ~¡¿-~. -.
I :,' ·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(,:
\
(
KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEE~S / Fort Worth-Dallas
February IS, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-906, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MOLLIE B. COLLINS ADDN., LOT 8, BLOCK I,
PREL. I FINAL PLAT, PS 84-19,20, GRID 69
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. Adequate fire hydrant coverage is not provided for this lot based on
Subdivision Ordinance criteria.
2. The owner should be required to p~ his prorata share of a future
6-fnch water line in Odell Street. We would estimate prorata at
$4.00 per linear foot for one-half of the future line for a total
length of 81 feet.
3. We note on the plans that there is existing curb and gutter fronting
along this lot. The developer should be required to escrow his
prorata share of future paving improvements on Odell with
appropriate credit given for the existing curb and gutter based on
the Ci~'s Street Assessment Policy.
ou have a~ questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
not hesitate to ca .
.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line. Cf~ Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
February IS, 1984
PS 84-19.20
PAGE
15150 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021. 817/283-8211. METRO/2e7-33e7
-
1
,./
. I
,/ ://
! "
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
11M
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
I
I~I
DATE: March 12, 1984
SUBJECT:
Bids Received for Auto Liability and Police Liability Insurance
DEPARTMENT: Personnel
BACKGROUND: Our current policies expire March 23, 1984. We advertised for bids
with four prospective bidders picking up the specifications. We received bids
from only two companies - one of which bid only the Auto Liability. Also, one of
the Auto Liability bids is in violation of the State Board of Insurance regulations
regardin~ the treatment of premium dividends. Premium dividends must be applied
at the expiration of the policy. The illegal bid had applied the dividend up
froQt at the inception of the policy. Therefore, the recommendation is for the
CounciI to reject all bids and call for new bids. We believe that resubmitting
these insurance coverages to bid is in the best interest of the City. Our current
carriers have agreed to give the City a thirty-day binder agreement extending our
current policy to April 23, 1984 which will give us enough time to rebid the
coverages.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Reject all bids and call for new bids.
~
Q
BUDGETm ITÐI: YES
ACCOUNT Nt7KBER:
NO
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
e
......
.....
?
DATE:
3/12/84
SUBJECT:
Northfield and Norich Park Projects
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: These park construction projects are progressing satisfactorily.
Total project is 29% complete.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Freeman, Inc.
Approve Payment of $145,370.16 to Steele and
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES X NO
Park General Obligation Bonds
1/
I
e..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
March 7, 1984
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-333, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
NORTHFIlED AND NORICH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor1s Partial Pay Estimate No.3 dated
March 7, 1984, made payable to STEELE-FREEMAN, INC., in the amount of
$151,116.13 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of February 28, 1984.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Greg Wheeler, as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $145,370.16, be made to
STEELE-FREEMAN, INC.,at 990 Blue Mound Road, Ft. Worth, Texas 76131.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the March 12 Council Meeting to answer any questions
you may have concerning this project.
(~
RWA/bvg
Enclosures
cc:~Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
~ Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
STEELE-FREEMAN Inc.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
'I
'Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE:
3/12/84
SUBJECT:
Northfield and Norich Park Projects
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: These park construction projects are progressing satisfactorily.
Total project is 29% complete.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve Payment of $145,370.16 to Steele and
Freeman, Inc.
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES X NO
Park General Obligation Bonds
I
/-
I
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
K NOWL TON-E NG II SH-F LOWE RS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
March 7, 1984
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-333, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
NORTHFILED AND NORICH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor1s Partial Pay Estimate No.3 dated
March 7, 1984, made payable to STEELE-FREEMAN, INC., in the amount of
$151,116.13 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of February 28, 1984.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Greg Wheeler, as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $145,370.16, be made to
STEELE-FREEMAN, INC.,at 990 Blue Mound Road, Ft. Worth, Texas 76131.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the March 12 Council Meeting to answer any questions
you may have concerning this project.
(~
RWA/bvg
Enclosures
cc:~Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
~ Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
STEELE-FREEMAN Inc.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
òd'
1?ATE:
March 7, 1984
SUBJECT:
Walkers Branch Pay Estimate #6
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: This project is about 80% complete based on the original contract.
We did have a change order for more dirt work downstream. This payment is 67% of
the original bid.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve the payment of $31,333.35 to M.A. Vinson
Construction Co.
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES X NO
General Obligation Bonds
1-' ,
/"
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth. Dallas
March 5, 1984
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-323. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WALKER'S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAl PAY ESTIMATE NO.6
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.6, dated
March 5, 1984, made payable to M.A. Vinson Construction Co., Inc.. in the
amount of $31,333.35, for materials furnished and work performed on the
referenced project as of February 28, 1984.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Floyd McCallum. as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $31,333.35. be made to
M.A. Vinson Construction Co. at P.O. Box 18520. Fort Worth, Tx.. 76118.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate fonm for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you
may have concerning this project.
RWA/l1g
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
7Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum. City Inspector
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
Mr. M.A. Vinson, Contractor
- ,
!Sso FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 .817/283-8211 · METR0/2e7-3387
~
I"
./
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE:
3/12/84
SUBJECT:
1984 Capital Improvement Work Plan
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: The Council was presented with an update on the current status of the
CIP Project at the February 27, 1984 Council Meeting. CIP Committee met on
March 7th and approved the 1984 work program. Request Council authorization to
implement the 1984 Capital Improvement Program as outlined on the attached page.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Adopt the 1984 Capital Improvement Program
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES X NO
GO Bonds
I.
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Recommendations to ClP Committee/City Council of remaining streets/drainage
projects in Capital Improvement Program:
I. Authorize City Engineer to proceed with design and bid the reconstruction
of the following streets:
Estimated Cost
Sheridan
Paramount
Linma
Bewley
Arnold Terrace
$172,645
80,300
56,210
92,345
68,255
$469,755
II. Authorize Public Works Director and Purchasing Agent to Contract overlay
of the following streets:
Matson
Dent
Garwood
Keeter
Cloyce
$ 6,240
4,200
6,800
9,300
5 , 1 00
$31,640
III. Appropriate sufficient CIP Bond funds to overlay, with City manpower, the
following streets:
Harmonson
Terry
Laurel
Cynthia
$3,400
2,900
1,500
1,200
$9,000
IV. Include the following projects in the 1984 Capital Improvement Program
and give City Engineer authorization to design engineer and bid the
following projects:
Harwood (Grapevine to Bob)
Glenview (Rufe Snow to Honey) 1,900 ft.
Lynn Terrace
Lola (unpaved section)
$ 290,000
258,500
435,000
72,100
$1,055,600
V. Previouly Approved - To be Contracted
Calloway Acres
Flory Street
Glenview, Phase II
$390,673
164,376
216,300
$771,349
I·
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
VI. Total 1984 Program
$2,337,344
VII. Unspecified Projects
$1,546,694
Delete the following projects from the CIP Program.
Hewitt Drainage
Morgan Meadows ~ast
Mickey and Center
Big Fossil Drainage
Page Two
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
lit
I
I
1)£ L£T)()J
-- Hewitt Drainage
$550,000
This project has been determined not to be cost effective. The development
currently in progress on the South side of Chapman Drive will relieve a major
portion of potential flood problems. Currently one or two houses would be
directly effected by this improvement and the half million dollar expenditure,
is not cost effective. The City can further relieve the potential problem
by better maintenance of existing drainage easements.
Morgan Meadows East - $804,000
This project has been pending for several years and the Council had
agreed to construct the drainage channel provided necessary easements
could be obtained from the property owners. Of the 17 property owners
contacted, only two agreed to give the easements.
-- Mickey and Center Streets
$165,000
Mîckey Street could not be built to City specifications in the existing
right-of-way. An adiitional ten feet of right-of-way on both sides of
the street would have to be obtained to complete this project. Some
residents have indicated their desire that the street not be improved.
Center Street will probably be abandoned as the church as indicated
their desire to purchase the land.
;1
I_~ ~ (OtU JII!t
I
I
I
I-
I
~
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
DATE:
3/12/84
SUBJECT:
Staffing of Building Inspection Services
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the memo from Gene Riddle which I sent to you
on February 20, 1984 concerning the need for an additional clerk to handle the
overwhelming building inspection workload. Subsequently, the Building Official,
Mr. Bill Rice, has resigned, which makes this critical situation even more acute.
We are requesting permission to replace the Building Official with
two Building Inspectors, as outlined in Mr. Riddle's attached memo, dated
March 5th, 1984.
It is anticipated that the cost of the two requested new positions
can be absorbed within the present General Fund Budget appropriation. Increased
revenues from building inspection fees, due to the high level of building
activity, will more than offset the costs.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Authority is requested to amend the 1983-84 Budget
to add two Building Inspector positions and a Clerk II position at salary ranges
of $1,314 - $1,892/mo. and $981/$1,281/mo., respectively.
BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
City of ~orth W.chland Hills
~.
t ~ \
\-i : \ ;1
-~\~i~=-- Star of the ~etroplex
~'
OFFICE OF
CITY MANAG~R
February 20, 1984
Ref: CML 0046-84
Re: New Clerk Position in Public Works Department
Dear
Attached is a memo from Gene Riddle concerning a difficult problem that is
being experienced due to the continuing growth of the City. It appears that
I may have been unrealistic in cutting his request for a new clerk position
out of this years budget. In addition to the workload information described
by Gene, please consider that, at the present time, we have approximately
339 single family dwellings, 62 commercial buildings and 1,000 apartment units
under construction in the City. It is particularly pertinent that, tradi-
tionally, this is the "slow" season and we can expect even greater activity
this summer.
Please review Gene's memo and I will contact you in a few days to get your
feelings about making a mid-year correction in our budget. Financing will be
no problem since building permit income is far exceeding budget estimates,
due to the high level of activity which is causing the demand for another
position.
Respectfully submitted,
Rodger N. Line
Ci ty Manager
RNL/gp
(817) 281·0041 / 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH R ICHLAND HI LLS, TEXAS 76118
I:
I
lie
City of ~orth 1lichland Hills
f
1 i /
.. ':.II ,.._
~
· i
"~
Star of the ~etroplex
I~
I
MEMO TO: Rodger N. Line, City Manager
REF: PWM-0011-84
I
FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works
DATE: February 10, 1984
SUBJECT: Request for a New Clerk Position
I
As you remember during last year's budget request along with
the request for a city engineer, I also requested a clerk.
I placed a priority one on the clerk ahead of the engineer's
position anticipating the clerical work in the planning and
zoning department and building inspection department was
going to exceed what the two people we now have can do.
I
I
The final results of this request is now history and I
again must request this clerk position. I will give you
statistics pertaining to building permits and planning
and zoning cases that go all the way back to October 1, 1981.
From that date forward to September 31, 1982 we issued 437
building permits and a total valuation of $21,049,537.
In that same year we had 39 zoning cases, 67 platting cases
and 18 cases before the Zoning Board of Adjustments. We
also had 4,485 inspections for that year.
I
Ie
I
The year from October I, 1982 through September 31, 1983,
we issued 982 building permits for a total value of $103,138,816
and we had l3,614 inspections, The zoning cases amounted to
76, 126 platting cases and 32 cases going before the Zoning
Board of Adjustments.
I
I
I
Since October 1, 1983 through January of this year, we have
issued 320 building permits for a total value of $30,002,767.
We have made 5,667 inspections, handled 20 zoning cases, 38
platting cases and 4 Zoning Board of Adjustment cases.
I
I anticipate that we end the year on September 31, 1984 with
about 150 million dollars in new property valuation if not
more. I feel that the number of permits will probably exceed
1,400 and the inspections will exceed 20,000.
I
I
I-
I
I would anticipate that we will probably have about 100 zoning
cases and also approximately ISO platting cases. I anticipate
that the Zoning Board of Adjustment cases will be less than
what we have had in the past.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
I j I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Memo: Mr. Rodger N. Line
Page 2
February IO, 1984
As you can see based on my projection, the number of cases
and permits will be tripled and quadrupled from 1982 to 1984.
Starting this week in the inspection department we have had
to change our system to make inspections the next day after
a request is made for an inspection instead of the same day.
The two ladies we have doing this work at the present time
are at their limit.
I request that I be allowed to hire another clerk as soon as
possible to help do the clerical work in both areas. I do
not consider this as a temporary position because I anticipate
our growth in the city to grow year after year for a number
of years. Of course, if something happened to slow down the
growth we would do like any other company and have to lay
the person with the least senority off. I would say that the
funds to pay this person would have to be appropriated from
some type of contingency fund as I do not have the funds in
my budget for this person.
~~
Gene Riddle
I
I
Ie
City of ~orth ~icWand Hills
'.
/
. ..
Star of the ~etroplex
. . I ...
i .
I
TO: Rodger N. Line, City Manager
REF: PWM-0013-84
I
FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works
DATE: March 5, 1984
SUBJECT: Inspection Department
I
As you are well aware, the Inspection Department and the Planning
and Zoning Department is just exceeding all expectations in
activity and I have had to request another clerk to keep up
with the paperwork in these two departments.
I
I
In the 1984-85 budget, one of my decision packets included
adding another building inspector but when checking the
statistics for the past five months, since October I, I do
not fee1that we can wait until October to add a new inspector.
I
Ie
I
As you know, March 16th will be Bill Rice's last day so I
have a proposal to make at this time. Since Greg Wheeler is
a jack-of-all-trades, I propose that the supervision of all
the inspectors come under Greg and instead of hiring a
building official in Bill Rice's place, I would like to have
permission to hire two building inspectors.
I
The first five months of this year we have issued 450 building
permits. This includes February which was estimated at this
time. For the same period last year we had issued 340 permits.
As you can see this is a little over one third more in increased
activity. The total permits issued last year were 982, this
year for the whole year I think we can easily anticipate 1,500
permits to be issued.
I
I
Even if we are allowed to hire two inspectors in place of Bill,
I think that we ought to leave another inspector in the 1984-85
budget for one-half year. If it is determined in March 1985 that
this person is needed then we would have it budgeted and we would
not have to go back and ask the Council. If this person is not
needed then we do not have to fill this position.
I
I
I
Ie
If this is not permissable I would ask that you still consider
the other part of that decision packet requesting a vehicle,
radio and map cabinets.
We have budgeted $2,348 a month for Bill Rice's salary, if we
hire two inspectors we will have to spend approximately $3,200
to $3,300 a month. This would increase our payroll budget
approximately $7,000 to $8,000 including benefits.
I
(817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. lOOP 820/ P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
I
Memo: Mr. Rodger N. Line
Page 2
March 5, 1984
I
1-
At the present time our income for five months has been $18l,447
with February being estimated. For the same period last year
our income was $84,000. The 1983-84 budget estimate of income
for the inspection department is $315,OOO. I anticipate that the
next seven months will bring in another $180,000 and that is a
conservative estimate.
I
I
I regret to have to request this during the middle of the year,
more especially since I just requested a new clerk but I did
not anticipate losing Bill Rice and I felt like that with his
experience that he could keep things going for the balance of
the year with Greg and myself helping when needed. But as you
can see from the statistics mentioned things are just getting
out of hand and we are not going to be able to make all the
inspections that we need to make with a new person coming in.
I
I
I might mention in closing that I may have problems trying
to hire two new inspectors because most of the cities in
the area are experiencing the same type of excellerated growth
that we are experiencing.
I
I
An early decision would be appreciated.
I_
I
~ ftJIt
Gene Riddle
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
'I
'I
..,. e
.··1
I
I
~...I
'I
,\ ,',
'~':I
,
Ie
tl
~.:I
II
rl
I
~,(
;~:.
~
II:'·. e
~.
~
(
P,··,I· .
~: ; . ,~; ;;
,,",' _>I!II'IIf"I'~.. , . ',"," ...",'~.'--(-,:."'. ....'".....
/7
DATE:
March 12, 1984
~
SUBJECT: Resolution
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: . According to State law absentee ballots must be certified. This
resolution certifies the number of ballots for each votin2 precinct.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Deny Resoluttion
.UDCETEDIT~~ . YES
·Accòl.Îti"JiUHBÖt;i·,j,N/A . . '
N/A
,JlO:
".,/,...)ì
. ":>'j<Z'
, ·f ','\ ,
~:~1~~~':,:: ',,' .·';::;¡'~\lff::i"'· "~'
I ~_ . ,L
, . .
)~,./
, :I
t;:¡,i_ ~'.,:~æ~~,î(';;·'-'f~~;'f%~1~¿[1:?(::' .
,.,,: ;:)::~,'±~~~'"i;~i;f~~?~éf. r ...
,'- ""'--"~·.,,'."'l;i-~ . .._~,). ,-~i~r"';·.... ~, )'I "'..~.çi:..,':~
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, will hold its
general City Election on April 7, 1984; and
WHEREAS, the official absentee paper ballots have been counted and
sealed up with instruction cards, poll list, tally sheets, distance markers,
returning blanks, stationery and a certified list of voters and the number of
each endorsed on the package.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it Resolved by the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
I.
The Council finds that the above has been accomplished and so certifies.
2.
The number of absentee ballots for each voting precinct and the range
of serial numbers on these ballots are as follows:
PRECINCT NUMBER
RANGE
3209
3072
3063
3049
3177
3041
3214
3140
3215
3289
3191
I - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
III - 120
l21 - 130
3.
meeting.
This resolution shall be entered as a part of the minutes of this
Passed and Approved at a regular meeting of the City Council
this 12th day of March, 1984.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL ITY :
City Attorney
I.
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
. --
DATE:
1/12/84
SUBJECT:
Citizens Presentation Regarding Clean-Up Campaign
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: Mr. Jack Roseberry has requested time under Citizen's Presentation
to discuss a proposed clean-up campaign to be sponsored by ERA Realtors.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
BUDGETED ITEM: YES
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
NO
I
I
[H
REAlYOR·
~Iarch 7th, 1984
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Rodger Line
City Manager
I:brth Richland Hills, Texas
Dear Rodger,
The Electronic .Realty Associates (ERA) Broker's Council of
I:brtheast Tarrant County has a campaign planned for Private
Property Week which we thought might appeal to your City.
As you know, April 8th through the 14th was nmœd Private
Property Week several years ago. Since that time, various cities
and private organizations have prcm:>ted the pride of ownership,
and encouraged people, not only to own, but to take pride in the
appearance and upkeep of their property.
Most of these efforts have been through Public Service ads in
local newspapers and over radio and T. V. .Certain Papers devote
entire sections to this effort. Radio stations to "spot" ads
all during the day each day of that week.
This year, the N. E. T . C . Broker's Council of ERA 'WOUld like to
propose a cooperative effort between the cities of ~rth Rich~.
Hills, Bedford, Hurst, lliless, Watauga" and Keller for a unique
pìãnror-spruc1Iïg'~-OUr-"atY~-II possiDle:wë would like to dis-
cuss this with you at your earliest convenience.
I
"I
I
I
I
I
I
I especially appreciate your ÿJQrk in behalf of I:brth Richland Hills.
Sincerely,
Ø!- Ro eberry J
for the Broker's Council
ROSEBERRY, INC.
5013 Davis Blvd.
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
817-281-5397
Metro: 498-5107
I
Each office independently owned ¡¡nd operated.