HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1985-06-24 Agendas
~,
!
).
4
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
1
It
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 24, 1985 - 7:00 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chamb,rs,
7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER
1.
ITEM
ACTION TAIfEN
City of Wataugå Annexation Request
(GN 8s-63-AgendaItem 115)
2. Chapman Road Improvements Bid Tabulation
(PW 8s-18-Agenda Item 118)
3. Reminde~-Capital Improvements Program
Task Force Meeting June 25, 1985 - 7:00
p.m. - Council Chamber
4. Other Items
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 24, 198s
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
NUMBER ITEM
1. Call to Order
ACTION TAKEN
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting June 10, 1985
5. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda
6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by
Asterisk (9, 10, II, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
19, 20, 21, 22 & 23)
7. PZ 85-59 Request for Appeal Hearing -
Richland Hills Church of Christ
8. SO 85-9 Request for Variance to Sign
Ordinance - 8011 and 8013
Grapevine Highway
*9. GN 85-57 Ordinance No. 1236 Adoption of
1985 Revised Building Code
*10. GN 85-58 Ordinance No. 1237 Adoption of
1985 Uniform Plumbing Code
*11. GN 85-59 Ordinance No. 1238 Adoption of
1985 Uniform Mechanical Code
.....,
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*12. GN 85-60 Amendment to Ordinance No. 1811
Regulation Use of Parks System
13. GN 85-61 Request of Rick Tuggle for a
Driveway Opening onto Rufe Snow
Drive
*14. GN 85-62 Annual Fund Transfer
*15. GN 85-63 City of Watauga Annexation Request
*16. GN 85-64 Eminent Domain Proceedings for
Flory Street Project - Resolution
No. 85-13
*17. PU 85-21 Prevailing Wage Rate Determination
Ordinance No. 1240
*18. PW 85-18 Chapman Drive Improvements Bid
Tabulation
*19. PAY 85-20 Payment for Master Drainage Plan
Mapping
*20. PAY 85-21 Morgan Meadows East Drainage
Improvements Partial Pay Estimate
111
*21. PAY 85-22 Watauga Trunk Line Phase I, Pay
Estimate 1/2
*22. PAY 85-23 Harwood Road Improvements Pay
Estimate 112
Page 3
---
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*23. PAY 85-24 Glenview Drive Improvements Pay
Estimate 1/2
24. Citizen Presentation
.....
25. Adjournment
--,
......
'"-
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JUNE 10, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
"'--
ì.-
1.
Mayor Echols called the meeting to order June 10, 1985,
at 7:30 p.m.
2.
Present:
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
Harold Newman
Marie Hinkle
Virginia Moody
Jim Ramsey
'--
Staff :
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Gene Riddle
Lee Maness
Richard Royston
Richard Albin
Press:
Duward Bean
Mark England
Absent:
Jim Kenna
Rex McEntire
3.
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilwoman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Public Works Director
Finance Director
Director of Planning
City Engineer
Northeast Chronicle
Mid Cities Daily News
Councilman
Attorney
The invocation was given by Councilman Ramsey.
4. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of May 13,
1985.
'--
Motion carried 6-0.
.....
s. Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed item #39, Mayor Echols removed
item #46 from the Consent Agenda.
"-
6. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 6-0.
"-
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 13, 1985
APPROVED
REMOVAL OF ITEM (S)
FROH THE CONSENT
AGENDA
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM
(S) INDICATED BY
ASTERISK (36, 37, 38,
40, 41, 42, 43, 44,
45, 47, 48, 49, 50 &
51)
APPROVED
....
"----.
Mayor Echols advised that Councilman Ramsey requested that
Item #33 be removed to 6A because he would have to leave the
meeting early due to a prior engagement.
'--
6A. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
send the Thoroughfare Plan, with amendments, back to the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
--
-
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that since many concerned citizens
had contacted the Council he felt it necessary to make the
following statements. The first matter that came to attention
was Susan Lee Lane which is shown as C4U had been changed
to C2U, collector type street. Vance Road was shown as a C4U
and is recommended to be a C2U. There would not be any houses
torn down on Holiday Lane to make it a four lane street.
There were some undeveloped portions of Holiday Lane that
needed to be widened, particularly south of Chapman in the new
Fox Hollow Addition, and between Chapman and the railroad
tract and as it goes further north into undeveloped areas
Holiday Lane may be widened to meet the criteria of M4U.
There was no way Holiday Lane could be widened around Richland
High School and along Holiday West Addition because homes were
there. Holiday Lane needed to be widened as much as possible,
however the City was not in the habit of tearing down houses
to put new streets in. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that
Starnes Road was another concern of 'the citizens. There were
some developed areas on Starnes that were not going to change,
but there were also some undeveloped areas on Starnes Road
east of the Stoneybrook Addition, where the street could be
widened. There was no way Starnes Road could be widened where
it was already developed and it should stay an C2U.
Mr. Richard Boykin, 7605 North Richland Boulevard, appeared
before the Council.
'--
Mr. Boykin stated that he had been informed that North
Richland Boulevard would be widened.
--
Mayor Echols stated North Richland Boulevard was not on the
plan to be widened.
"--
Mr. Dan Anderson, 7201 Lola, appeared before the Council.
'--
Mr. Anderson asked what was meant by Holiday Lane being
widened as permitted to M4U and if so how is it going to
affect the traffic where it is not a M4U? Mr. Anderson stated
it would be a bigger mess around the high school than it was
presently.
'-
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he felt all would agree that
if Holiday Lane from Loop 820 to Lewis Lane was wider it would
be beneficial but the easiest route is to take the additional
right-of-way from the high school property. Mayor Pro Tem
',-
June 10, 1985
Page 2
PZ 85-40 REVISED
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
Davis stated that he was not sure of the answers, and the
Council was going to send it back to Planning and Zoning for
further study. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it was not in the
plans right now to widen Holiday Lane.
-
Mr. Anderson stated if was not in the plan why was it shown as
a M4U street.
....
Mayor Echols stated the City hired a consultant to help with
the Thoroughfare Plan and the shortages of north-south
thoroughfares had been identified. Mayor Echols stated that
Holiday Lane was the only possibility for creating a north-
south thoroughfare, which was probably less than desirable
because of the way it had to curve around to reach the north.
--
.....
Councilwoman Moody stated she did not know where all the
citizens were when the Thoroughfare Plan was advertised in the
newspaper. Councilwoman Moody stated this Thoroughfare Plan
was a road map for the City to go in the right direction
because it was only half developed. Councilwoman Moody stated
it did not mean the City was going to start tearing down
everyone's house. Councilwoman Moody stated she felt the
citizens needed reassurance that the Thoroughfare Plan was
something to give the City direction and safe growth for the
future.
Councilwoman Hinkle stated that this was simply a plan for the
future and certainly the City had neither the money to start
widening streets or buying peoples homes. Councilwoman Hinkle
stated that without a plan you have no direction and she saw
this as a plan for the future.
Mr. Lee Miller, 5124 Holiday Lane, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Miller stated he had a concern on the widening of Holiday
Lane but had also heard the property was all going to be zoned
light commercial.
Mayor Echols stated he knew of no plans to make the property
commercial, maybe somewhere where it was not developed.
Mr. Miller asked if Holiday Lane was widened how much
right-of-way would the City take?
Mayor Echols stated the requirement was 68 feet of right-
of-way with 48 feet of pavement.
Mr. Miller stated the street was 40 feet at the present time.
'--
Mayor Echols stated the street would remain 40 feet except in
the area of Fox Hollow Addition.
June 10, 1985
Page 3
ì.-
----
Mr. Miller asked if the 40 foot street in his area would stay
the same.
"-
Mayor Echols stated that this Council had no intention of
widening it in that area.
--
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he did not feel the Council
could state that it would never happen. Mayor Pro Tem Davis
stated it was possible that in 10 years or so if a traffic
count indicated that Holiday Lane needed to be widened, it
might happen; but there were not any plans in the near future
to do so.
--
Mr. Miller asked if the street had to be widened would the
right-of-way come off one side or both.
Mr. Line stated a detailed engineering plan would have to be
made before that question could be answered. Mr. Line stated
the logical thing would be to take it from each side but then
it might be more practical to take it all from the school
property.
Mr. Miller asked if the Thoroughfare Plan came up again if
there was any way besides reading it in the newspaper that
the people on Holiday Lane could be notified.
--
Mr. Line stated the City would do the best they could to
notify everyone involved. However he could not promise
specifically that it could be done, because every action that
was taken at City Council Meetings affected the lives of the
people of the City to some degree. Mr. Line stated it could
not be anticipated who exactly would be affected, and in what
manner, and it would be hard to send a personal notice to
40,000 people.
"-
Mr. Miller stated that if the citizens were going to lose
property he felt they should be notified.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that if right-of-way was needed
the person affected would be notified.
Mr. Billy Williams, 7437 North Richland Boulevard, appeared
before the Council.
'-
Mr. Williams stated that he had spent time talking to the
people in the area and was surprised at how very few knew
about the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Williams stated
that he felt some of the things that had been said tonight
was indecisive and that is why he was here. Mr. Williams
stated that he and his neighbors were here for one or two
reasons. One reason was due to very clearly indicated
changes in the Thoroughfare Plan and the other reason was
that some changes were indicated graphically but were not
properly annotated. Mr. Williams stated that additionally
June 10, 1985
Page 4
June 10, 1985
Page 5
"-
more than one of them had been told something different about the
street situation and they wanted to get a consensus from the
Council. Mr. Williams stated he had been assured by the City
Staff over the last three years that Holiday Lane would never
be widened and therefore was upset when he saw the Master
Plan. Mr. Williams stated that the City did need a plan for
orderly growth but not at the expense of the citizens that
had bought homes and settled here. Mr. Williams stated the
plan, as it stands now, was incomplete. Mr. William stated
the plan addresses the streets and not the people or their
investments. Mr. Williams stated he was personally concerned
because Holiday Lane was on one side of his property and
North Richland Boulevard on the front. Mr. Williams stated
that some of the citizens were here because the graphic
charts show North Richland Boulevard as a collector street
but did not indicate if it was C2U or C4U and some had been
told varying opinions. Mr. Williams stated he and his
neighbors were against the widening of Holiday Lane and
North Richland Boulevard.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Williams if he thought North
Richland Hills Boulevard should be shown as a C2U on the map.
Mr. Williams stated yes, he had attended the Planning and
Zoning Meeting and the people on Riviera got a consensus from
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
ì.-
Councilwoman Moody stated she agreed that the people on
Holiday Lane had the same rights as they ones on Riviera.
Councilwoman Moody asked Mr. Williams if it would make his
happy if C2U was designated on both ends and M4U in the
middle and put the responsibility on the Council and Staff to
find another way to deal with the congestion and traffic.
'-
'--
Mr. Williams stated it would make all of us happy to show
Holiday Lane, all the way to Watauga Road, and North Richland
Boulevard as C2U.
Councilman Ramsey left the Council Meeting at this point.
Mr. Ray Yoakum, 6808 Starnes, appeared before the Council.
'"-
Mr. Yoakum stated he felt Starnes should not be widened where
it was already developed.
Mr. Jim Cato, 6729 Corona, appeared before the Council.
'--
Mr. Cato stated he had heard rumors that Redondo had been
added to the Thoroughfare Plan.
'-
'-
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Redondo had not been added.
--
....
"-
Mr. Cato asked what the City policy would be on the
implementation of the Thoroughfare Plan pertaining to new
development or new zoning.
....
Mr. Line stated that if it had to do with undeveloped
property, the Thoroughfare Plan would be a guide to the
Planning and Zoning Commission in terms of determining
right-of-way widths to be dedicated for street purposes and
construction standards to be adhered to by developers.
Mr. Robert Taylor, 4724 Mackey, appeared before the Council.
.....
Mr. Taylor asked what the designation for Redondo was.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it was a residential street.
....
Mr. Jack Roseberry, 8912 Martin, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Roseberry expressed his appreciation to the Staff and
Council who had worked long hours on this plan for the City.
Mr. Roseberry stated he still had concerns on the route of
Crane Road.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
.....
'--
Mayor Pro Tem Davis amended the motion to send the
Thoroughfare Plan back to Planning and Zoning with the
following amendments: Susan Lee Lane designated as C2U;
Starnes Road west of Davis C2U and east of Davis M4U; Holiday
Lane north of Loop 820 M4U (consideration to be given to
physical restraints as it is not the City's intention to
displace people).
Motion carried 5-0.
'--
Mayor Echols called a recess.
Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order, the same
Council and Staff present as recorded in the roll call
except Councilman Ramsey, who left the meeting.
7. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and presented the
following information:
This Zoning Application is presented on the restaurant lot
located on the south side of Bedford-Euless Road east of
Grapevine Highway. The requested rezoning is from C-1
Commercial to C-1 Commercial - Specific Use - Sale of
Alcoholic Beverages. The applicants are completing the
renovation of the restaurant at this location known as
"Senor Chick's" and they wish to sell alcoholic beverages
with their food service.
'-
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of
this request to please come forward.
June 10, 1985
Page 6
RECESS
PZ 85-39 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING REQUEST OF
SENOR CHICK'S OF
TARRANT COUNTY TO
REZONE LOT 3, KIP'S
BIG BOY ADDITION FROM
C-1 (COMMERCIAL) TO
C-1 - SPECIFIC USE -
SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (LOCATED AT
7762 BEDFORD-EULESS
ROAD)
Mr. Dennis Bloat, 9009 Hunters Glen Trail, one of the owners,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Bloat stated he was applying for the specific use permit
so he could be competitive with surrounding businesses.
Councilman Fisher asked Mr. Bloat in whose name the permit
was to be issued.
Mr. Bloat replied the permit would be issued in the name of
John Bloat.
Mayor Echols called for anyone in opposition to this request
to please come forward.
....
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols
closed the public hearing.
8. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve Ordinance No. 1217, permit to be in the name of
John Bloat and non-transferable.
Motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Rex McEntire, Attorney, is recorded as now being present at
the meeting.
9. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. William Stolberg, representing NRH Joint Venture, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Stolberg stated this was a 12.145 acre tract with 3;5
acres of agriculture between two pieces of commercial
property and they wanted it to match the rest of the tract.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
10. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve Ordinance No. 1218.
Motion carried 5-0.
I..,.,.
\......
June 10, 1985
Page 7
ORDINANCE NO. 1217
APPROVED
PZ 85-41 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING REQUEST OF
NRH JOINT VENTURE TO
REZONE TRACT lIE, J.
H. BARLOUGH SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 130, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) AND C-1
(COMMERCIAL) TO C-1
(COMMERCIAL) -(LOCATED
AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SMITHFIELD
ROAD AND WATAUGA
ROAD)
ORDINANCE NO. 1218
APPROVED
v
11. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. John Barfield, 416 Louella, Hurst, appeared before the
Council.
'--
Mr. Barfield stated that when this request was presented
previously the people in the subdivision along Timber Drive
objected to the commercial zoning because it would be abutting
their property. Mr. Barfield stated that at the property
owners request he went back and cut the tract in half and
made a portion commercial and there was no objection to this.
Mr. Barfield stated he made the property adjacent to their
homes 0-1. Mr. Barfield stated he would be happy to answer
any question the Council might have.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
--
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
12. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
approve Ordinance No. 1219.
Motion carried 5-0.
13. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. John Barfield, 416 Louella, Hurst, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Barfield stated that they were asking for O-l zoning
because they felt it would be a better zoning for this
property.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Barfield if he would have any
problem with the stipulation that Wilson Lane be constructed
before any buildings were built.
Mr. Barfield stated no.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
!
'\
'-
14. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to
approve Ordinance No. 1220 with the stipulation that Wilson
Lane be constructed prior to any building.
Motion carried 5-0.
.....
June 10, 1985
Page 8
PZ 85-43 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING TRACT 3 -
REQUEST OF B. H. & L
JOINT VENTURE TO
REZONE TRACTS A2, B,
C2, & 7A2, STEPHEN
RICHARDSON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1266, FROM
AG (AGRICULTURE) TO
C-l (COMMERCIAL)
(LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF DAVIS
BOULEVARD AT THE
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
WITH WILSON LANE)
ORDINANCE NO. 1219
APPROVED
PZ 85-44 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING TRACT 5 -
REQUEST OF B. H. & L
JOINT VENTURE TO
REZONE TRACT 15A2A
AND PART OF TRACTS 9
& 9A, STEPHEN-
RICHARDSON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1266, FROM
AG (AGRICULTURE) TO
0-1 (OFFICE DISTRICT)
(LOCATED ALONG THE
SOUTH SIDE OF THE
PROPOSED EXTENSION OF
WILSON LANE MIDWAY
BETWEEN DAVIS
BOULEVARD AND
PRECINCT LINE ROAD)
ORDINANCE NO. 1220
APPROVED
15. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. John Barfield, 416 Louella, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Barfield stated that they had considered putting multi-
family on this property and decided it would be more suited
for offices.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
16. Councilman Newman moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Ordinance No. 1221.
Motion carried 5-0.
17. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. John Barfield, 416 Louella, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Barfield stated that the original request was for R-3 and
the Planning and Zoning Commission felt that R-2 would be a
better zoning.
Mr. Nelson Miller, Richland Hills Riding Club, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Miller stated that at the Planning and Zoning Commission
there was discussion of a buffer zone being put in between
the Riding Club and the residential zone property.
Councilwoman Moody asked what his idea of a buffer was.
-
Mr. Miller stated anything but residential.
Mr. Roger Martin, 8633 Timber, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Martin stated he would like the Council to take the
buffer zone into account.
Mr. Norman McGlowen, 312 Sheffield, appeared before the
Council.
'-
June 10, 1985
Page 9
PZ 85-45 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING TRACT 6 -
REQUEST OF B. H. & L
JOINT VENTURE TO
REZONE PART OF
CHEROKEE ESTATES FROM
PD (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT), C-l
(COMMERC IAL) & AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO 0-1
(OFFICE DISTRICT)
(LOCATED WEST OF
DAVIS BOULEVARD,
SOUTH OF PROPOSED
WILSON LANE)
ORDINANCE NO. 1221
APPROVED
PZ 85-46 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING·TRACT 8
REQUEST B. H. & L.
JOINT VENTURE TO
REZONE TRACT 4 & PART
OF TRACTS 3 & 4A,
THOMAS PECK SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1210, & PART
OF TRACT 3A, STEPHEN
RICHARDSON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1266, FROM
AG (AGRICULTURE) TO
R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED SOUTH OF
SHADY GROVE ROAD,
WEST OF DAVIS
BOULEVARD)
.....
~
Mr. McGlowen asked the Council for consideration for the
riding club's request because they did use their facilities.
Mr. McGlowen stated that he worked with 4H Clubs on a
county-wide basis and they used the riding club facilities.
After further discussion Mr. Barfield stated he would
like to withdraw or have this request tabled so that
he could work something out with the people.
Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing.
18. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
table Ordinance No. i222.
Motion carried 5-0.
19. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. John Barfield, 416 Louella, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Barfield stated this would be a buffer zone between the
single family and the commercial. Mr. Barfield stated that
the Planning and Zoning had requested they reduce some of the
commercial zoning and they were therefore trying to comply.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
of this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols
closed the Public Hearing.
20. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Ordinance No. 1223.
Motion carried 5-0.
21. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. John Barfield, 416 Louella, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Barfield stated this was located next to commercial
property and they wished to make it 0-1.
.....
Ms. Carol Bentley, 3637 Timber, appeared before the Council.
Ms. Bentley stated she would request that the street be
constructed before any building.
'-
Mr. Roger Martin, 8633 Timber, appeared before the Council.
ì.-
June 10, 1985
Page 10
ORDINANCE NO. 1222
TABLED
PZ 85-47 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING TRACT 17 -
REQUEST OF B. H. & L.
JOINT VENTURE TO
REZONE PART OF TRACT
5, BRENTWOOD ESTATES
FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO R-4-SD (SEPARATE
OWNERSHIP DUPLEX)
(LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF DAVIS
BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF
SHADY GROVE ROAD)
ORDINANCE NO. 1223
APPROVED
PZ 85-48 PLANNING &
ZONING-PUBLIC HEARING
TRACT 18 - REQUEST OF
B. H. & L. JOINT
VENTURE TO REZONE
LOTS 12 THRU 18,
HOLDER SMITHFIELD
ADDITION FROM R-3
(SINGLE FAMILY) TO
0-1 (OFFICE DISTRICT)
(LOCATED EAST OF
DAVIS BOULEVARD AND
SOUTH OF THE EXISTING
SUBDIVISION ON TIMBER
DRIVE)
.....
Mr. Martin asked what could be built in 0-1 zoning.
"'-
Mr. Royston stated that professional offices could be built.
.....
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
22. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to
approve Ordinance No. 1224 with the stipulation that Wilson
Lane be constructed before any development.
Motion carried 5-0.
23. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. John Barfield, 416 Louella, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Barfield stated the Council had previously approved office
zoning with the stipulation that the street be a break between
the zoning districts.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
24. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Ordinance No. 1225.
Motion carried 5-0.
25. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Benny Cardona, one of the owners, appeared before the
Council.
.....
Mr. Cardona stated that the restaurant had previously sold
alcoholic beverages and was recently sold to him and he wished
to continue to sell alcoholic beverages.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
'-
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
June 10, 1985
Page 11
ORDINANCE NO. 1224
APPROVED
PZ 85-49 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING TRACT 19 -
REQUEST OF B. H. & L.
JOINT VENTURE TO
REZONE PART OF TRACT
9A, STEPHEN
RICHARDSON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1266, FROM
AG (AGRICULTURE) TO
R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF PROPOSED
EXTENSION OF WILSON
LANE AND EAST OF
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
ALONG TIMBER DRIVE)
ORDINANCE NO. 1225
APPROVED
PZ 85-50 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING REQUEST OF
LOS HOMBRES
RESTAURANT TO REZONE
PART OF LOT 4R-2,
BLOCK 10, SNOW
HEIGHTS ADDITION FROM
C-2-SPECIFIC USE -
SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES TO C-2
-SPECIFIC USE - SALE
OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (CHANGE OF
OWNERSHIP) (LOCATED
AT 5344 RUFE SNOW
DRIVE)
'-
~
'--
....
--
'--
--
......
......
"-
'-
'--
'-
26. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve Ordinance No. 1226, permit to be in the name of
Bennie Cardona and non-transferable.
Motion carried 5-0.
27. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. John Jackson, representing Mr. Ray Hawrylak, trustee,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Jackson stated the request contained 16.582 acres and they
were requesting R-2 zoning. Mr. Jackson stated the lots would
be 9,000 square feet or larger.
Mayor Echols presented the following comments from the staff:
(1) Starnes Road is included in the proposed Thoroughfare
Plan as a four lane street requiring 70 feet of right-
of-way. This requirement will need to be included in
the Preliminary Plat.
(2) Holiday Lane is shown in the Thoroughfare Plan as a two
lane collector street which also will need to be included
in this plat.
(3) John Autry Road is also designated in the Thoroughfare
Plan as a collector street. It is shown to be extended
west to Douglas Lane. To accomplish this routing a
portion of the required 60 foot right-of-way will have
to be included in this plat. In addition an existing
lot in the Kingswood Addition must be modified to make
the street connection.
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Jackson if he would have any problems
concerning the comments.
Mr. Jackson replied no.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
28. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
approve Ordinance No. 1227.
Motion carried 5-0.
June 10, 1985
Page 12
ORDINANCE NO. 1226
APPROVED
PZ 85-52 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING REQUEST OF
RAY HAWRYLAK,
TRUSTEE, TO REZONE
TRACTS 3B & 3C, JOHN
CONDRA SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 311, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO R-2
(SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF STARNES ROAD,
BOUNDED ON THE EAST
BY KINGS WOOD ESTATES)
ORDINANCE NO. 1227
APPROVED
ì.-
"-
29. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Ordinance No. 1231.
Motion carried 5-0.
30. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve Ordinance No. 1232.
Motion carried 5-0.
31. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Ordinance No. 1233 with the deletion of 9A.6B.
Motion carried 5-0.
'--
32. Mayor Echols presented the following information:
'--
This proposed Zoning Ordinance revision modifies the number
and size of parking spaces required for disabled parking.
In reviewing the requirements of the Ordinance in relation
to the adopted State of Texas guidelines, the Staff discovered
the City's requirements were significantly more stringent both
in the number of spaces required and the size and location of
those spaces. The proposed revision would bring the City's
requirements into conformance with the state guidelines.
'--
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Ordinance No. 1228.
Motion carried 5-0.
33. Moved to item #6A.
'-
'-
.....
34. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
'--
June 10, 1985
Page 13
PZ 85-53 ORDINANCE
NO. 1231 - AMENDMENT
TO ORDINANCE NO. 1080
- ZONING ORDINANCE TO
ADD THE APPLICATION
OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS
TO THE COMMERCIAL
DISTRICTS
APPROVED
PZ 85-54 ORDINANCE
NO. 1232 - AMENDMENT
TO ORDINANCE NO. 1080
- ZONING ORDINANCE TO
ADD SECTION 14.3.13
TO ALLOW THE ADDITION
OF AN APARTMENT TO
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
SELF-STORAGE OR
MINI-WAREHOUSE
PROJECT
APPROVED
PZ 85-55 ORDINANCE
NO. 1233 - AMENDMENT
TO ORDINANCE NO. 1080
- ZONING ORDINANCE TO
ADD SECTION 9A - ZERO
LOT-LINE SINGLE
FAMILY DETACHED
HOUSES
PZ 85-57 ORDINANCE
NO. 1228 - AMENDMENT
TO ORDINANCE ~O. lb80
- ZONING ORDINANCE TO
MODIFY THE NUMBER AND
SIZE OF PARKING
SPACES FOR THE
DISABLED
PZ 85-40 REVISED
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
POSTPONED
PUBLIC HEARING -
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
....
~
....
'--
'--
ì.-
.....
......
.....
'--
.....
"-
"-
'-
Mayor Echols stated the City had the write-up on the Master
Plan proposal which was the rationale for the Master Plan and
there was some essential elements to the Plan. Mayor Echols
stated this narrative was one of them, others were the Master
Drainage Plan, the Master Thoroughfare Plan and the Master
Land Use Plan. Mayor Echols stated the Master Drainage Plan
had already been approved. The Narrative Plan will be sent
back to Planning and Zoning for further consideration and
then submitted to the Council for approval.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher to
send the Comprehensive narrative back to the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Motion carried 5-0.
35. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve the request for an appeal hearing, to be heard July 8,
1985.
Motion carried 5-0.
*36.
*37.
June 10, 1985
Page 14
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
HEARING - PZ 85-42 -
B. H. & L. JOINT
VENTURE
APPROVED
PS 85-25 PLANNING &
ZONING - REQUEST OF
R. W. WRIGHT FOR
SHORT FORM PLAT OF
LOT 5, BLOCK 7,
BRIARWOOD ESTATES,
2ND FILING (LOCATED
ON THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF HEWITT LANE
AND POST OAK DRIVE)
APPROVED
PS 85-26 PLANNING &
ZONING - REQUEST OF
JAMES W. BROCK FOR
REPLAT OF LOTS 7R &
15R, BLOCK 1,
PARKRIDGE ESTATES
APPROVED
.....
'-
*38.
....
......
.....
'-
*40.
'--
*41.
......
'--
*42.
.....
....
\'"--,
.....
.....
39. Mr. Jim Saylor, 4509 Shady Lane, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Saylor stated the Planning and Zoning approved this plat
based on two items; one, the easement which has been granted,
and second a requirement to put in a concrete channel liner
which would cost approximately $90,000. Mr. Saylor stated he
would like the Council's consideration for removing the
requirement for the concrete channel.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
approve PS 85-31 subject to the engineers comments as
recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Motion carried 5-0.
*43.
*45.
June 10, 1985
Page 15
PS 85-30 PLANNING &
ZONING - REQUEST OF
NEW CENTURY
DEVELOPMENT FOR FINAL
PLAT OF SUNNYBROOK
ADDITION, 2ND FILING
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF CARDINAL LANE
WEST OF SMITHFIELD
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL)
APPROVED
PS 85-31 PLANNING &
ZONING - REQUEST OF
H.C.A. HEALTH
SERVICES OF TEXAS,
INC. FOR FINAL PLAT
OF LOT 1, BLOCK F,
CALLOWAY FARMS
ADDITION (LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF
BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD,
SOUTH OF NORTH HILLS
MEDICAL HOSPITAL)
APPROVED
GN 85-51 ORDINANCE
NO. 1229 - CHANGING
BRIDLE PATH LANE TO
TEXIAN TRAIL
APPROVED
GN 85-52 ORDINANCE
NO. 1030 - PROPOSED
CLOSING OF MABELL
STREET
APPROVED
GN 85-53 LONE STAR
GAS COMPANY'S REQUEST
FOR RATE INCREASE -
ORDINANCE NO. 1234
APPROVED
GN 85-54 APPOINTMENTS
TO LIBRARY BOARD
APPROVED
GN 85-55 EXTENSION OF
AUD IT CONTRACT
APPROVED
'--
'-
"--
*47.
"-
46. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody to
approve GN 85-56, Ordinance No. 1235.
Mr. Jim Cato, 6729 Corona, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Cato stated the Ordinance stated that disabled people
with a doctor's certificate could obtain tub-out service
at curb-side rate. Mr. Cato stated that his mother-in-law
would not be able to take her garbage to the curb but would
not qualify by the Tarrant County requirements for the
disabled. Mr. Cato asked what kind of proof the City would
require as far as bei~g disabled.
Mr. Jeff Peckham, Regional Manager of GSX, advised that a
letter from a doctor once a year would be required.
Mr. Cato asked how the citizens would be notified.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis advised the City would do their very
best on notification. It would be put in the quarterly
newsletter and probably notices would be sent with the
water bills.
Mr. Cato asked if the letter from the doctor would go
to GSX or the City.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the letter would need to go
to GSX.
Motion carried 5-0.
*48.
*49.
*50.
June 10, 1985
Page 16
GN 85-56 FRANCHISE
WITH GSX CORPORATION
FOR REFUSE SERVICE
ORDINACE 111235
APPROVED
PU 85-19 BID - NEW
FIRE STATION -
REPLACEMENT FOR
SMITHFIELD STATION
- .
APPROVED
PU 85-20 BID -
IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR
NORTHFIELD PARK
APPROVED
PW 85-16 BID - WATER
AND SEWER LINE IN
BRIARWOOD ESTATES
APPROVED
PW 85-17 BID - HEWITT
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
---.
*51.
....
.....
.....
'-
52. Mr. Dan Anderson, 7201 Lola, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Anderson asked on what authority was the stop sign
at Holiday Lane and Lola removed.
Mr. Line stated it was by his authority which was based on
recommendation from the Planning and Development and Public
Works Departments because cross traffic did not warrant
a stop sign.
Mr. Anderson asked if they didn't feel the school traffic
warranted it.
Mr. Line stated that since school was not in session it
would have to be checked when school was back in session.
Mr. Anderson stated that the speed limit signs were also
missing.
Mr. Line stated only the school speed limit signs were
supposed to be taken down and he would check on the other
signs.
Mr. Steve Miller, 7301 Spurgeon Court, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Miller stated he felt it was not worth the danger with
the stop sign down. Mr. Miller stated it would be very
good if a light could be put there.
Mr. Line stated he did not know if a light would be
warranted according to the guidelines the City had to
abide by.
June 10, 1985
Page 17
PAY 85-19 CALLOWAY
ACRES STREET AND
DRAINAGE
IMPROVE~1ENTS ,
ESTIMATE 117,
$lls,794.07
APPROVED
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
-'-
'"-
'--
'---
53. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to adjourn the meeting of June 10, 1985.
Motion carried 5-0.
June 10, 1985
Page 18
Adjournment
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
L
"
CITY OF
NORTHRICHLAND HILLS
[ . Department:
"""-'
Subject:
Administration ....
·····QØUncll Meeting Date: 6/24/85
Agenda Number: PZ 85-59
Request fo;4p'Deal Hearing; - PZ 85-59
Richland RU'lsChurch of Christ
If Council approves the request.ror an Appeal Hearing, thet:t.e~d.ngcan be set for
July 22, 1985.
U Recommendation:
l Approve/Disapprove AppealHearÌ1'1g~
~
j~
~
~ Source of Funds:
~ Bonds (GO/Rev.)
. l Operating Budget
~ Other
~
L
N/A
Finance Review
Acet. Number " N/ A
Sufficient Fùnd$ Available
-
Department Head SiGnature.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
R'flJMÙ
City Manager
. Finance Director
Paoe 1 of
1
,.....
..~,~ ~ RICHlAND HillS CHURCH OF CHRIST
6720 N.E, LOOP 820 · FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 . (817) 281-0773 Metro 498-6970
-,-
June 18, 1985
Mr. Roger Line
City Manager
P.O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Appeal PZ8559
Dear Roger:
-
As per our telephone conversation today, the Richland
Hills Church of Christ requests an appeal to the North
Richland Hills City Council of the Planning & Zoning
denial of our zoning request PZ8559.
I understand that this will be placed on the agenda for
the council meeting of July 24, 1985.
Sincerely,
~J ¿&¿c¿~<-j
Charles L. Owen
CLOjdea
'-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Subject:
j
~
(
L
Planning and1)eveløþ1åent
Request forV"~4.an.ceto Sign Ordinance
8011 and 8UU,,{i~.'P:~Yine H1.gfiway
CQuncll Meeting Date: 6/24/85
Agenda Number: SO 85-~
The applicant in this reCJ:!,lleat haa an existing commerc;t.â~E~~tldingon Lot 12 Block 23
Clearview Addition loc~~~~«åti/8ql1Grapevine Highw.Y~~/,~~.\,1t\sthas been submitted to
Building Inspection reqt$~~t~J;1.j~~einstallation o.f ia.~~bsi~'for the two businesses
at that location. The1:'~~\,1e't~~r{)ermit was deniedbs~4¡~p:()1:\'Section 4.1(f) of the
Sign Ordinance which sts~$í~.ini1nutaof 100 feet ofc¡u~~f;:f.~..treet frontage is
required for a grounds;p.. Theapplicants/lot, is 9Z~2.'fe~tinwidth. .
The applicant is requesting{t~atJthe,City Council apprÓ'\Î'e<åvariance to the Ordinance
allowing this lot to erec.t a;ground.sign.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Fund&Available
". ~f<l;&~
~_ " ' -¡ty'Manager
. CITY: COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
'''',:',i'' ~'~'):<\'>:
'- -
'--
5004 Oak Timber Ct.
Colleyville Tx. 76034
June 5, 1985
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Tx. 76118
Attention:Jeanette Rewis
Honorable Mayor & City Council:
Subject: Pole Sign for June 24, 1985, Docket
I have requested a permit for a pole sign at my_
building located at 8011 and 8013 Grapevine Hwy. The
City Staff refused that permit based upon the sign
ordinance.
I would request that you consider allowing me a
variance to the sign ordinance to allow a Pole Sign
at my building.
Please put me on the docket to be reviewed June
24, 1985.
Sincerely,
~..~ ~
6-~~ .
(Mrs.) Virginia Rader
'-
6,
.:ì~ '-'
. ,1 !o 5
..
.. '3
ò 4 <I ~
1 '" OJ'
,...
~ Z
,.. 8 & 1
l!J ..
ð '27 18 1., ~
" ~
oJ 'Z~ . '" ð
\j , : ç.
"0 " '0
, ø 7 , .\0
'" ~ "I A
W 0.; \ ~
.. Z 1 ~ 4-
... '"
, tJ
.. g H
,0 93, .,
Q
\\ \.b ' ::
..
,+ AI
d1
1(,
c
"
:3
4<
'1
'6, tS·\("
,<
'-
...
g,
70 , -3
r . . ,
<- . 7 ~ '2.~ \ ..
, '"
7. ...., .:: ,
.'
r (, 5 4 ::3 ~
, -
.'
"3
4.
5
{,
'\
Q
,
,
.,
~. '2.c.~ woo t:> ~
.n
1 3 ~
s
<- ~1
." ,
---,
I
I
I
I
I
I
-__--1
..... ~
~ \\Q.
0-
,.
J lOll
t/J.
0
P
'-
'\~ ø.
0
.. .;
0 I,. 1/1
~ \I "
lR In CøR
\Sa. ~
'2<
,\!ø R ~Q. \Nt)\
1
\ìR. 'DR. .. SA.
'
W
.u.. ~ 411. 4(
0 \&Q.
01. \...;
\J
3R. \ , ~ ~
..
~....... ~
L ~
"
>'\.,i' ..
CITY OF
NOFfrH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and D-.velq"1.1t
>.COuncil Meeting Date: 6/24/85
Agenda Number:GN 85-57
Subject:
Ordinance No.12~6i Mop,t1øn of 1985 Revised
luilc1tng Code
The City of North RichlandHillshas adopted as its criteT.'ia·for all building
construction the Unif uildiq'Code as published by t ternational Conference of
Building Officials. publication is updated on a repl)a$is and periodically a,
new edition is issued . 'porates all of the revisi~. approved by the
organization in construct1.onteniques and materials. The 19a5 Edition of the UBC has
now been issued and ready for adoption. ".'
In addition the Building n.p~rtm_nt. has incorporated &ev.èral items~ related to the
Building Code which are,uniqué:·tothe City, to changes in the State Law or to create
specific construction cr1te~ta.
(1) Changes in State 'Law nowallów misdemeanor fines to be levied up to $1000.00.
(2) The Department of Planning ànd Development and the Building Official are
identified.
~
~~
f
~
L
(3) The current fee schedule in,the UBC is adopted.
(4) Specific details regarding fire rated construction are added .
The Staff has prepared an analysis 'Of the current fees chargèct.for building permits and
the fees charged under thepro,osed schedule for three typical ~e permits. One of
these is a typical single £81II.11y re8~dence. Under the !currentscbedule the building
permit would amount to $265.00. Under the proposed schedulethè fee would be $649.00.
The second building is an office structure of 34,000 square feat. Under the current
schedule the building pemitfee'would be $2949.75. Under the proposed schedule
the permit would amount to $6990.85. '
RECOMMENDATION: It isrec_ended tbat the City Counei1approye Ordinance No. 1236
adopting the 1985 Edition of thèUaiform Building Code.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GQ1Rev.)
ÒperatlngBudget
o
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Suffièlent ,":undsiAvsUable
, . l(14L~
Head Slgnatute City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Direcfor
!
\
Page 1 of
City of j\(8rth Richland Hills~ Texas
~,~,
~1I"_,~
~-
r'~
MEMORANDUM
JUNE 24, 1985
TO: City CounciJ
FROM: Richard Royston
Director of Planning and Development
SUBJECT: Building Permit Fees
The following is an evaluation of the impact of the proposed updated fees
for building permits in the City on three typical structures. The current
fee schedules, with the exception of the Electrical Permit Fees have not
been revised since 1979.
(1) Single Family Residence (1764 square foot living area, 420 square
foot garage)
TYPE PERMIT CURRENT FEES PROPOSED FEES
Building $ 190.00 $ 504.00
Plumbing - 0 - 35.00
Htg/Air 0 35.00
-
Electrical 75.00 -
75.00
,
,
TOTALS 265.00 649.00
(2) Strip Shopping Center, Shell only 34,000 square feet Est. cost
$1,325,000
TYPE PERMIT CURRENT FEES PROPOSED FEES
Building $ 2895.75 $ 6911. 85
Plumbing - 0 - 25.00 (Min)
Htg/Air - 0 - N/A
Electrical 54.00 54.00
-
'- TOTALS 2949.75 6990.85
(8171281,0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLANO HILLS, TX 76118
· "
.....
(3) Food Store 46,000 Square Feet Est. Cost $1,600,000
TYPE PERMIT CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE
',--
I Building $ 3968.25 $ 5047.57
Plumbing 0 123.00
Htgl Air - 0 - 125.00
Electrical 168.00 168.00
TOTALS 4136.25 5463.57
'-
'-
'--
ORDINANCE NO. 1236
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, that Ordinance No. 784, adopted September 24,
1979, Building Code for the City of North Richland Hills, be amended
so that the following amendments to the said Building Code be and they
are hereby made as follows:
Section 5.1.
Aùoption of Building Code and Standards.
The Uniform Building Code, 1985, the ICBO Installation Standards
and amendments and revisions thereto as adopted by the International
Conference of Building Officials, a copy of which is attached hereto
is hereby adopted and designated as the building code of the City, the
same as though such code were copied at length herein except as-
amended, added to or deleted in this chapter. Three (3) copies of the
code and amendments are on file in the office of the City Secretary.
Section 5-2.
Penalty; enforcement
(a) Any person, firm, or corporation violating any portion of
this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not
less than fifty dollars (50) nor more than one thousand dollars
($1,000.00). Each day's violation shall be considered a separate
offense.
(b) (to remain the same)
Section 5-3.
Amendments to specific building code sections.
Section 201 of the Uniform Building Code is héreby amended to
read:
Section 201(a) There is hereby established in this jurisdiction a code
enforcement agency which shall be under the administrative of the
Department of Planning and Operational Control of the building
official.
(b) The building official shall be appointed and dismissed by
the City Manager.
Section 205 of the Uniform Building Code is amended by adding the last
sentence thereof to read:
Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for
each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of
any of the provisions of this code is committed or continued and upon
conviction of any such violation such person shall be fined not to
exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).
"'--
Section 301(b) (to remain the same)
.....
Section 307. Table No. 3-A is reinstated and the Fee Schedule
adopted by Ordinance #784 paragraph 1.10 on September 24, 1979 shall
be deleted.
\.......
Section 2516(f)s of the Uniform Building Code is amended by changing
the first paragraph to read:
5. Draft stop construction. Draft stopping materials shall be
not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction.
Section 2517(g)2 of the Uniform Building Code is hereby amended
to read:
2. Framing details. Studs shall be placed with their wide
dimension perpendicular to the wall. Not less than three studs shall
be installed at each corner of an exterior wall.
---
EXCEPTION: At corners a third stud may be omitted through the
use of wood spacers or backup cleats of 3/8-inch-thick plywood,
1-inch-thick lumber or other approved devices which will serve as an
adequate backing for the attachment of facing materials.
All wall studs shall be capped with double top plates installed
to provide overlapping at corners and at intersections with other
partitions. End joints in double top plates shall be offset at least
48 inches.
When bearing studs are spaced at 24-inch intervals and top plates
are less than 2 by 6 or two 3 by 4 members and when the floor joists,
floor trusses or roof trusses which they support are spaced at more
than 16-inch intervals, such joists or trusses shall bear within 5
inches of the studs beneath or a third plate shall be installed.
Studs shall have full bearing on a plate or sill not less than 2
inches in thickness having a width not less than that of the wall
studs.
Section 5-4.
Relationship to zoning.
In the event that Ordinance No. 1080, zoning ordinance, in any
way conflicts with this chapter, building code, then in such event,
Ordinance No. 1080, zoning ordinance, shall govern.
Section 5-5. (to remain the same)
Section 5-6. (to remain the same)
Section 5-7. (to remain the same)
Section 5-8. (to remain the same)
Section 5-9. Certain residential buildings required to have
percentage masonry, brick, etc.
'-
"-
All multifamily, two-family, one family dwellings and permanent
structures on a residential lot shall have exterior walls constructed
of seventy-five (75) per cent brick, stone, or if apprived by the City
Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics.
Exterior wall shall mean that exposed portion of the building from the
foundation up to the ceiling line of the first floor of the building.
.....
Section 5-10. (to remain the same)
Section 5-11. (to remain the same)
Section 5-12. (to remain the same)
Section 5-13. Fire protection and separation between zero lot line,
two-familYr and multifamily dwellings.
......
(a) Zero lot line and two-family dwellings shall have a one-hour
fire separation from each other continuous from the floor to the bottom
of the roof deck. Where the roof-ceiling framing elements are
parallel to the walls, such framing and elements supporting such
framing shall be of not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction
for a width of not less than four (4) feet on each side of the wall.
Where roof-ceiling framing elements are perpendicular to the wall, the
one-hour fire-resistive construction shall extend not less than four
(4) feet on each side of the wall with fire blocking between the
rafters.
(b) Multifamily dwellings shall have a one-hour fire separation
between each unit. If trusses are used in the floor-ceiling assembly,
then they shall be protected by one-hour fire-resistive materials
enclosing the entire truss assembly on all sides for its entire length
and height. Draft stops shall be installed in the attics above and in
line with the walls separating each unit from another unit.
.....
'-
'-
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of
, 1985
Mayor
ATTEST:
'-'
City Secretary
'--
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
'--
City Attorney
'--
L or -
II Department:
I.... ........
Subject:
CITY OF
HORTH RICHLAND HILLS
L
Ordinance No~ 1231··· Adoption of 198s Uniform..
. .PIU1Jl.b1~g Code
. ,'. .", 6/24/85
C()Uncll Meeting Date:
GN 85-58
Agenda Number:
Planning and Devel~pment
The City of North Riehlaad Bills has adopted as its criteria for plumbing construction,
the Uniform Plumbing Code.ás published by the InternatiQnal Association of Plumbing and
Mechanical Officials. ~is.p\1blication is revised on a lar basis and periodically a
new edition is releasedwhicb'1n<:orporates all of the edchanges in the Code. The
1985 Edition of the UPC hås nowheen issued and is readYfðr'adoption.
In addition the Building1>ep.ärtment has incorporated several items related to the
Plumbing Code which are unique. to the City, to changes in State Law and to create
specific construction criterià.·· '
~
~
~
I
~-
~
~
~
l
(1) Changes in State taw a 11.ows misdemeanor finestô:bèlevied up to $1000.00.
(2) Permit fees are established to reflect current (iosts.
(3) Specific construction details are added.
Prior to this proposed o~c1inance the City had not specifically collected any fees for
plumbing work. The costs, were considered to be subs:Ldiaryto the general building
permit. Under the terms:of the proposed fee schedule: the specific items involved in all
plumbing work will be permitted. ·'rhe Staff had made an evaluation. of three types of
typical permits regarding tñe additi-onal fees. A typical reeidential structure would
pay a plumbing permit fee of $35.00. On an office structure of 34,000 square feet the
plumbing fee would be $2.5.00~
RECOMMENDATION: It is rec01llllended.that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1237
adopting the 198s Edition of tha Uniform Plumbing Code.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Op ngBudget
er
Finance Review
Acct. Number·
Sufficient f'j.lnds Available
. r~/~
ent Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
City of j\(8rth Richland Hills, Texas
~~
MEMORANDUM
JUNE 24, 1985
TO: City Counci~
FROM: Richard Royston
Director of Planning and Development
SUBJECT: Building Permit Fees
The following is an evaluation of the impact of the proposed updated fees
for building permits in the City on three typical structures. The current
fee schedules, with the exception of the Electrical Permit Fees have not
been revised since 1979.
(1) Single Family Residence (1764 square foot living area, 420 square
foot garage)
TYPE PERMIT CURRENT FEES PROPOSED FEES
Building $ 190.00 $ 504.00
Plumbing - 0 - 35.00
Htg/Air 0 35.00
Electrical 75.00 75.00
-
TOTALS 265.00 649.00
(2) Strip Shopping Center, Shell only 34,000 square feet Est. cost
$1,325,000
TYPE PERMIT CURRENT FEES PROPOSED FEES
Building $ 2895.75 $ 6911.85
Plumbing - 0 - 25.00 (Min)
Htg/Air - 0 - N/A
Electrical 54.00 54.00
"'-- TOTALS 2949.75 6990.85
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118
;>
(3) Food Store 46,000 Square Feet Est. Cost $1,600,000
TYPE PERMIT CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE
Building $ 3968.25 $ 5047.57
Plumbing 0 123.00
Htg/Air - 0 - 125.00
Electrical 168.00 168.00
TOTALS 4136.25 5463.57
'-
......
ORDINANCE NO. 1237
--
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, that Ordinance No. 873, adopted February 9,
1981, Plumbing Code for the City of North Richland Hills, be amended
so that the following amendments to the said Plumbing Code be and they
are hereby made as follows:
Section 19-1. Adoption of Plumbing Code and Standards.
The Uniform Plumbing Code, 1985, the IAPMO Installation Standards
and amendments and revisions thereto as adopted by the International
Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, a copy of which is
attached hereto-is hereby adopted and designated as the plumbing code
of the City, the same as though such code were copied at length herein
except as amended, added to or deleted in this chapter. Three (3)
copies of the code and amendments are on file in the office of the
City Secretary.
Section 19-2. Code construed as remedial.
(to remain the same).
Section 19-3. Scope; applicability.
(to remain the same).
Section 19-4. Violations and penalties.
'-
'--
Any person, firm or corporation or agent who shall violate a
provision of this code or fail to comply therewith or with any of the
provisions thereof, or violate a detailed statement or plans submitted
and approved thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Each such
person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every
day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the
provisions of this code is committed or continued,' and upon conviction
in the court of jurisdiction for any such violation such person shall
be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) and not
more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). Each day the condition
exists constitutes a separate violation.
Section 19-5. Plumbing Official and Inspection Department.
(to remain the same).
Section 19.6 Right of entry.
(to remain the same).
Section 19-7. Liability of enforcement officers, board, etc.
(to remain the same).
Section 19.8. Requirements not covered by code.
(to remain the same).
---
Section 19-9. Licensing and bonding of plumbers.
(to remain the same).
--
....
-
Section 19-10
~
Section 19-11.
Section 19-12.
Section 19-13.
Section 19-14.
Section 19-15.
Section 19-16.
Section 19-17.
Section 19-18.
Allowing name, license or bond to be used to obtain
permit fraudulently.
(to remain the same).
Illegal work; revocation of license.
(to remain the same).
Plumbing installation or maintenance by homeowner.
(to remain the same).
Alternate materials, methods of installations.
(to remain the same).
Maintenance. (to remain the same).
Mandatory sewer connections. (to remain the same).
Test of suspected defective plumbing.
(to remain the same).
Unsafe installations. (to remain the same).
Floor drains required.
All commercial businesses shall install a floor drain for both
public and employee restrooms. They will be equipped with a P-trap as
set forth in the Uniform Plumbing Code Section 706.
Section 19-19.
Approved materials for water service.
Copper tube for water piping shall have a weight of not less than
Type L.
PVC Schedule 40 pipe may be used for the water service from the
meter to within two (2) feet of the structure.
Sections 19-20 ---- 19-34. Reserved.
ARTICLE II. PERMITS
Section 19-35. Required; exceptions. This section of Ordinance
#873 paragraph 104.1, adopted on February 9, 1981 shall be
amended to read:
Permit required. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to
install, remove, alter, repair or replace or cause to be installed,
removed, altered, repaired or replaced any plumbing, gas or drainage
piping work or any fixture or water heating or treating equipment in a
building or premises without first obtaining a permit to do such work
from the Administrative Authority.
(b) A separate permit shall be obtained for each building or
structure.
--
.....
(c) No person shall allow any other person to do or cause to be
done any work under a permit secured by a permittee except persons in
his employ.
(d) Ordinary minor repairs my be made with the approval of the
plumbing official without a permit provided that such repairs shall
not violate any of the provisions of this code.
(e) Work not requiring a permit shall be subject to Part I,
Administration, Section 20.5 of the Uniform Plumbing Code.
.....
Section 19-36. Application. (to remain the same).
Section 19-37
Drawings and specifications. (to remain the same).
.....
Section 19-38. Fees. This section of Ordinance #873 paragraph
106.1, 106.3 (A) (B) adopted February 9, 1981 shall be amended to
read:
No permit shall be valid until the fees prescribed in this
section shall have been paid. The City Council may increase these
fees or establish such additional fees as it deems necessary.
PERMIT ISSUANCE
(1) For issuing permits (3) through (16) $15.00
2) For issuing each supplemental permit
"- One bath 25.00
One bath with gas appliances 35.00
Two bath 35.00
Two bath with gas appliances 45.00
Three bath 45.00
Three bath with gas appliances 55.00
UNIT FEE SCHEDULE
In addition to item (1) or (2):
(3) For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap
(including water, drainage piping and backflow protection
therefore) 4.00
.....
....'-
(4) For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer 15.00
(5) Rainwater systems, per drain (inside building) 6.00
(6) For each cesspool (where permitted) 25.00
(7) For each private sewage disposal system 35.00
(8) For each water heater and/or vent 7.50
(9) For each gas piping system of one to five (5) outlets 10.00
.....
./'
(10) For each gas piping system over five (5) outlets, per
outlet
1.50
(11) For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor
including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type
grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps
12.00
(12) For installation, alteration or repair of water piping
and/or water-treating equipment, each
3.00
(13) For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping each
fixture
3.00
(14) For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in item
(4) :
1 to 5
over 5, each
7.50
1.50
(IS)
For each backflow protective
type vacuum breakers:
2 inches and smaller
Over 2 inches
device other than atmospheri~-
--
7.50
15.00
(16) For each lawn sprinkler system on anyone meter including
backflow protection devices therefor shall be fifteen
dollars ($15.00) plus estimated cost based on Table No.
3-A of the Uniform Building Code.
Section 19-39. Issuance or refusal. (to remain the same)
Section 19.40. Conditions of the permit; effective period shall
be amended to read:
-
A permit issued shall be construed to be a license to proceed
with the work and shall not be construed as authority to violate,
cancel, alter, or set aside any of the provisions of this code, nor
shall such issuance of a permit prevent the plumbing official from
thereafter requiring correction of errors in plans or in construction
or of violations of this code. Any permit issued shall become invalid
unless the work authorized by it shall have been commenced with six
(6) months after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such
permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of six (6) months after
the time the work is commenced; provided, that for cause, one
extension of time for a period not exceeding ninety (90) days, may be
allowed in writing by the plumbing official. An extension may be
granted if a request is submitted in writing to the plumbing official
before the permit expires. After the permit expires a new, full
permit fee must be paid before the permit is renewed.
-
Section 19-41. Failure to obtain a permit. (to remain the same)
-'--'
Section 19-42. Revocation. (to remain the same)
Sections 19-43----19-57.
Reserved.
......
ARTICLE III. INSPECTION AND TESTING OF WORK
¡.,... ,."
This section of Ordinance #873 adopted on February 9, 1981 is
included in the Uniform Plumbing Code and need not to be repeated.
This section or Ordinance #873 shall be amended to read:
Section 19-58. Inspection and related fees.
.....
[The following shall be paid for inspection and related reviews]
(1) Inspections outside of normal business hours, per hour
30.00
(Minimum charge-------Two (2) hours)
'--
(2) Reinspection fee assessed under provisions of Sec. 305(g)
of the Uniform Building Code 30.00
(3) Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated,
per hour 30.00
(4) Additional plan review required by changes, additions, or
revisions to approve plans, per hour 30.00
(Minimum charge----one half hour)
Section 19-59. Stop-work orders.
Upon notice from the plumbing official that work on any plumbing
installation is being done contrary to the provisions of this code or
in a dangerous or unsafe manner, such work shall be immediately
stopped. Such notice shall be in writing and shall be given to the
permit holder, or to his agent, and shall state the conditions under
which work may be resumed. Where any emergency exists, oral notice
given by the plumbing official shall be sufficient.
-.,
---
'--
.....
PASSED AND APPROVED this
...... .....
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
~
,.....
-
--
.....
.....
....
-'-.-
.....
day of
, 1985
Mayor
L . ^ ~- .
L
L
L
L
L
CITY 0 F
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Ordinance No. 12.38 Mopt1on of 1985 Uniform
. t{êclJânical Code
Council Meeting Date: 6/24/85
Agenda Number: GN 85-59
, Subject:
The City of North Richl_dRi1ls has adopted, as itscri
construction, the Unifo:ntMechanical Code as publisbe4
of Plumbing and Mecbantcal, Offic:ia1s. This publica
and periodically a new editi~n1..re1eased which inc.: à all of the approved
changes in the Code. Tb. 1985Uit1on of the UMChasnowheen issued and is ready for
adoption.
.... ,
In addition the Building,Deparþ1enthas added two changes"q,The first raises the maximum
fines to $1000.00 whichi.scønjÜtent with current Statê,Làw. .The second adds a fee '
schedule for permitting.ec~nica1 work. Previously the City besnot required a fee or
permit for this work eJtcè:ptas a subsidiary to the gener.al.permit.
RECOMMENDATION: It isr"C01IIUnded that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1238
adopting the 1985 UniforaMeèhanica1,Code.
L
~
~ .
{ . Finance Review
( Source of Funds: Acct. Nllmbet:
1~ ~ _~==. . Sufficient Fúllds ¡"'ÍI~Hable
[ ~-t'~ .j Æ:.1!. ~
1 ! Depa,rtmè HMSIonalUfe.' · ty Manager
L CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Paae 1 of
',--
City of j\{8rth Richland Hills, Texas
~. r4=-.
~~~
y
MEMORANDUM
JUNE 24, 1985
TO: City CounciJ
FROM: Richard Royston
Director of Planning and Development
SUBJECT: Building Permit Fees
The following is an evaluation of the impact of the proposed updated fees
for building permits in the City on three typical structures. The current
fee schedules, with the exception of the Electrical Permit Fees have not
been revised since 1979.
(1) Single Family Residence (1764 square foot living area, 420 square
foot garage)
'- TYPE PERMIT CURRENT FEES PROPOSED FEES
Building $ 190.00 $ 504.00
Plumbing - 0 - 35.00
Htg/Air 0 35.00
-
Electrical 75.00 75.00 -
-
TOTALS 265.00 649.00
(2) Strip Shopping Center, Shell only 34,000 square feet Est. cost
$1,325,000
TYPE PERMIT CURRENT FEES PROPOSED FEES
Building $ 2895.75 $ 6911.85
Plumbing - 0 - 25.00 (Min)
Htg/Air - 0 - N/A
Electrical 54.00 54.00
-
TOTALS 2949.75 6990.85
"--
-
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118
¡-
! .~
I
(3) Food Store 46,000 Square Feet Est. Cost $1,600,000
TYPE PERMIT CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE
Building $ 3968.25 $ 5047.57
Plumbing - 0 - 123.00
Htg/Air - 0 - 125.00
Electrical 168.00 168.00
TOTALS 4136.25 5463.57
.....
'-
· .
.....
'-
ORDINANCE NO. 1238
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, that Ordinance No. 806, adopted March 10, 1980,
Mechanical Code for the City of North Richland Hills, be amended so
that the following amendments to the said Mechanical Code be and they
are hereby made as follows:
Section 14 1/2-1 Adoption of Mechanical Code and Standards.
The Uniform Mechanical Code, 1985, the IAMPO Installation
Standards and amendments and revisions thereto as adopted by the
International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, a copy
of which is attached hereto is hereby adopted and designated as the
mechanical code of the City, the same as though such code were copied
at length herein except as amended, added to or deleted in this
chapter. Three (3) copies of the code and amendments are on file in
the office of the City Secretary.
Section 14 1/2-2
Violations and penalties. Shall be amended to
read:
Any person, firm or corporation or agent who shall violate any of
the provisions thereof, or violate a detailed statement or plans
submitted and approved thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each
and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of the
provisions of this code is committed or continued, and upon conviction
the in the Court of Jurisdiction for any such violation such person
shall be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00)
nor more than one thousand dollars ($1000.00). Each day the condition
exists constitutes a separate violation.
Section 14 1/2-3
Amendments to specific sections of the code.
Section 306, Table No.3-A, of such code is hereby omitted and deleted
in its entirety and shall be replaced by the following:
1. A mechanical permit is required on all construction.
2. Mechanical permit fee schedule:
MONETARY VALUE OF BASE PLUS PERCENTAGE
PROPOSED WORK OF ESTIMATED COST
$ o - 500 $ 20.00
501 - 1,500 25.00
1,501 - 3,000 30.00
3,001 - 5,000 35.00
5,001 - 50,000 0.00 + .009
"---' 50,001 - 100,000 100.00 + .008
100,001 - 500,000 200.00 + .006
500,001 - or more 700.00 + .004
3. Other inspections and fees:
PER HOUR
--
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours
(Minimum charge -- Two (2) hours)
$ 30.00
2. Reinspection fee assessed under provisions of
Section 305(g)
30.00
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically
indicated
30.00
4. Additional plan review required by changes,
additions or revisions to approved plans
(Minimum charge --- one-half hour)
30.00
The rest of the Ordinance is to remain the same.
, ~
',-
\,'~
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of
, 1985
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
-",
"
\"--':'- ,.
L·
~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Parks and Recreàticm
Amendment t~ Orò1:(w1ce U81
Regulation U.eof"arks
,Council Meeting Date: 6/24/85
L LDepartment:
SUbject:
~
t
,1239
Agenda Number: GN 85-60
It is believed that the·Ord1.nance establishing rules a~d reg1Jlations for use of City
parks should be amended tospee·1f1.ca1.ly authorize the C:t.tY~nager or his authorized
agent to close any port1on.or .Uof, the City's parks when weather conditions (wet
grounds, storms, etc.) WuldmakehuArdous the use,óf these facilities. The Park
Director's authority to cloSe wet ball diamonds~a8reeentlyquestioned. Therefore, it
is proposed that an ato Ordinance 111181 beádoptèd;stating, "The City Manager or
his authorized agent :Ve the ,authority to close all or any portion of the City's
Parks to use when weather or other conditions make the ¡rounds hazardous or unfit for
activities. The City Manager, òr his, agent shallmak..'good fáith effort to notify all
interested parties at the earl:1est:possible time. tI ' ,
This wording should be inserted {ollowthg the fitst séntenceof Section VII.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that theC1t;yCcJ11ncil authorize the~ndment to Ordinance H81 as
described above.
Finance-Review
Source of ..Funds:
~~
Deparyment He~dSignature,
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
I?/!I¿~
City Manager
P;:¡OP. 1 nf
I
L'
lL
I.
l
t
l
t
l
l
l
L
L~
L
r
L
L
L
L
L
l
L
L
ORDINANCE NO. 1239
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that ORDINANCE NO. 1181, establishing Rules and Regulations in
City Parks, adopted February 11, 1985, and as heretofore amended, be and the
same is hereby amended at the following section:
SECTION VII.
The City Manager, or his delegate, is hereby authorized to establish hours
of operation for City park facilities where buildings and structures are
involved in the public enjoyment of said facilities. The City Manager, or
his authorized delegate, shall have the authority to close all or any
portions of the City's parks to use when weather or other conditions make
the grounds hazardous or unfit for activities. The City Manager, or his
delegate, shall make a good faith effort to notify all interested parties
at the earliest possible time. The procedure and presumptions outlined in
Section V. above hereby incorporated and prosecution under this ·Section of
the offense will be known as "Facilities Trespass".
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE
DAY OF JUNE, 1985.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
,,~ 5 ~~5
f~ r'Yl ' t(1~{:: ~J I..'G-G-te 6 C::;b - D7 () :f
?ßDÖ¡ I?eclw{)(J-Þ (f
lVClrd-l t2ch/~J Hd&/x ?blð'2)
~ T 0-JuMT t- ~ -;taæcl ~ ~_ 4lrJ~1
-tk- ~ ZCfM Æ~ef=~ ~ Ik- {{~ {J~e/
.....~~~
_ d u.-iYff M ó:- j;u¡µwar (la-I- twl-G 2þ ~ A.
-JÆn71 ~ JJ~"'i¡ 1trl:¿LÉ at' G70¿; /U£~ 12ti..
~A-0 ~.~ ul- /vcw ~/ Þf ~
j!ci¡ wi.Þ7 -1M r~ tdMR- ~ð-1H/ a-.-c(l .Lie-
~L? ij47l-¿1 tff¿UJ. ~4^ J- A~ µæ
~f ~ j~ CZo/-I ~ ~ /uh1 Z;#
1JJ cPi~ #cc¿" -fk:f ~ ø~Y tc aL/tud#
* µI -tf.¿ þ¿tI-f~. ~ ~tt-~
~~y to~ (!d;; ifc[~ wdI {l~f M.¿
~ JdJ s Ið '7 ;d~aJl /~ cu-I
~ ú ¿rd~ +k rðJr(· ~ /'~r-l- ~
û,(-¡yc ð-- 1/~L.
~J ;::~¿¿ ?.1-0.
~(j-ls-lt¿V ~ m.-:- JrÇ n1e'.5
;,LNC-
L '
Ll. De~artment:
L SUbject: ' Request of Rick
[ Rufe Snow Driv~
~
~
~
~
~
~
y~
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works,
Ooun,cll Meeting Date:
Agenda Number:
6-24-85
GN 85-61
TU2~¡e'for .þrivewav OÐenin2 onto
Driveway openingsaX'~a~p1:'ovedbythe Public Worlœ])tapart~nt and we
usually do not concern Qur$elves with the openingsi)lnless they happen
to request one onat.þorougbfare ora collector,st.reet. In the case
of Rufe Snow, we a;t'ta1imit;j.ngdriveway openingst;Qasfew a~possible.
As you know Rufe Sn()Wonit:ij~\soµ.tb.end has become véryàongtasted and
it is important thati~~l¡{,ttdna.~faasmuchconflictonthen():r;th end of
Rufe Snow as possible,and,totTYtt)"eliminate traffic congestion and
hazards.
The Building InspectiÞni~p,Æirttllent;reviews, a, set, of.. Plans ,brought in
by the builders an~wben.t~eyreview theplanstbeYÆJr~mainly looking
at the constructionoftbe>~u:l.lding to see t1iat~t11\eetsthe building
code and do not pay atten~t01\, to the site planwnic;husua:tly shows
where the driveway is gOing..
This house is not completeat.tih:fs time and was just under construction
when I observed thatithad>a<!:,f!a.r garage. lmac1e An inquiry to the
building inspectiondepartaentiand looked at the site plan and observed
that it showed thattherewQuld. bé a driveway onto Rufe Snow. I informed
the inspector that,reviewe4 the plan to tell,thebu.ilder that he would
have to run his driveway to the front of the house on North Park.
I do not agree that t'h.ed:r;iv8W'ÆiY is going to ,cQstanaddit,ional 5 to 7 thousand
dollars as Mr. Tuggle has~tated in his letter and it w:f.ll not devalue the
property. I had told. Mr.>'r'u$g¡e ithat 'there are ,plenty of other houses that
have garages on the baçk of:itheh()use with driveways running ,along the
side of the house and. s.uggeste~tþat he could. ,run his driveway along either
side of this house to getiI1tQ<tbegarage which is ,o.nthe rear of the house.
Rufe Snow in this areåiri the future is going to carry a lot of traffic
and if we caneliminatea.i,traffic hazard by not allow1ng a driveway opening
onto Rufe Snow, wewillbebètter off in the future. I do 'not feel that
this creates a hardshipontbis builder.
Recommendation: Thei· staffr~CQ111\JIéndation is to deny. the request of Rick
Tuggle for a driveway opening onto .Rufe Snow.
-
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufflc.lent Funds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other ~«, U
Depariñiont'SlI<Iattk
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
-----
\
/
R~~
Oity anager
, Finance Director
Page 1 Of
1
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance
In order to comply withge....rtilyaccepted procedureafórtawicipal finance, the City of
North Richland Hills _kes .n lUµlual transfer from Gei1eral'Fund Reserves to the General
Capital Improvement Fund's UUPèc;Uied Projects account. tthas been determined that
$900,QOO is the apprC?Ptiat~ sum for the 1984-85 fiscal year's transfer.
Council Meeting Date: 6/24/85
Agenda Number: GN 85-62
..( ,""
Subject: Annual Fund Tranafèt .
Recommendation:
It is recommended that-the tr.ansfer described above be approved.
(
~
~-
¡
~
~
~ Source of Funds:
t Bonds (GO/Rev.) ---.,;...
ope, r, ating Budget , -,.-....,..,' ,
L Other _ ... £). ~,.',"
I ---r::-ev ')¡; ,.~ ~.,~
r Depa~ment Head Signatore '"
L ,C/TYCOaNCIL. ACTION ITEM
Finance Review
Acct. Number 13-00-99-6150
SUffl':!.ent~~
R~'~·
City Manager
./
-- ,Finance Director
PaQe 1 of
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~
~
~
~~
~
~
Department: City Manager
Subject: City of WatauaaAnnexation Request
Council Meeting Date: 6/24/85
Agenda Number: GN 85-63
As indicated in theat*=ac~e~i:J..t~erthe City of Wataugawantêto annex a church located
in the City of Fort'Worthne~rthe Watauga City Limits. .,l10tlt!ver, the City of North
Richland Hills' waterJ:~8erv~:I.:randpump station, whichi:l.s a.1.so in Fort Worth's
jurisdiction, lies' bettl~~n)iJi.litaJ.\~a.lsboundary and the.chuFe.ltproperty. Accordingly the
City of Watauga hasre9ueste4tJ:tat~e join them in request:l.ngtlte City of Fort Worth to
deannexour propertys() that *t eanbe annexed to Wataugaalot)'gwith the church. The
staff can see no reason to objec::ttothis request.
Recommendation:
It is recommended
of Fort Worth for
it can be annexed
tha~/~heC~tyCoûnc::il authorize the5:1.t~Manager to petition the City
deannexationo£ the water facilities property on Watauga Road so that
by.., Watauga.
Bonds (GO/Rev .)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
SufffclehtFundsAvaHable
---
~11/~'
City Manager
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONtTSM
,Paae'1 of
7101 WHITLEY ROAD * WATAUGA, TEXAS 76148 * (817) 281.8047
June 11,1985
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
N. Rich1and Hills, Texas. 76118
ATTN: Roger Line
-
Dear Roger:
This is in reference to the item which I discussed with
you on 06-11-85. The property in question is circled
on the attached map. The ownership of the land in ques-
tion is somewhat confused at the present time. Different
sources contacted at the City of Ft.Worth state the land
lies within the city limits of Ft.Worth, other sources
state that it is in Tarrant County but bound by a fifty
(50) ft. easement. The church is requesting annexation
by the City of Watauga because the majority of the church
members are citizens of Watauga and due to its close
proximity to the City's boundary.
In order to annex the church, the City of Watauga would
have to take in the property owned by the City of North
Rich1and Hills which lies between the church and Watauga's
western boundary.
The question I have posed to you is, would the City of North
Rich1and Hills join in with the church to seek annexation
by the City of Watauga?
Thank you very much for taking your time to consider this
matter.
Sincerely,
13#
Bill Keating
City Manager
BK/rms
Enclosure
~"I· ~ ~ -~:
/;
=
- þ
~L. ~ I ~
Nl"'i4L Tn AD n
., ;f i
_~~m ~
ASPI", C!,~ ~
i5.. ~ ~ D
: nn ~/
ESTu.4C~ ;;~! ,L r \J
:.:D n ~ I
..: ~Î'\ -- i
...., - ~'" ~-;',IID,No\, DA ~ : ~ ~~O ENOENT SCHOOL O~STRICT BOUNOAItJ
i , ::;~ ~ fiV I --
,I;I~ ~ Clilf I~
~,l-;!ti~£~p D. ~ I~
IsT01!!~, K j~ ¿~." -r-Y.Sf.!!j ~ Q
i~!:! UD'l!S ON.T : ¡: ~
\:11}", /", "'~'::; ,_
~ .. : ¡~ ,CI> !
...... r ~ II>
H~__ -...; 212 C
I JJo I¡ e :... '.. i ,;; g e_~
PLUMST ~ e i ii I~ T~!cT ~ · n
~ ~çgivl8 .. I; .. z r:. GA NflLD ~ ~ E j ~"' ~..
l.L ~CT- ..... "AAH !:f!: EN [liNN A~ !! ~ !! i ~
~!:' :; æ¡ 0 % Õ _ft _ JO.NNII ST", Ilt~ð). ~e i
I: !:g: ~ ¡ r: _1-0. ~!: ill !I Þ 0).1 0 ~.n
. jp 0 ! O!".) 1_. .. z 8 z 'fi I'Í.J:
..... J"' Z !Do Z ~, IS.. ! Þ is I!HUQHESD t!7' 5Ii''!''
1 ':i¡¡j · ... :!i Sc ~~ - ~'\ ~
IE D D I))~ ,i ."' = PATSY LN II ywl.lIW.11 ~ tor ~
' "' i D ;: Z Þ ¡PA,., ~ 13 '~ c::;
J ~ ~ ~H~ ~D Š i Q ITII:.).- t/ ~~~~~ 8; ~ f AD :J>
'f~! ~ a Cli ~ .~~ D 1= p-",= ~ an.' ........ D "';: Z .~ IðIUIlACT -t, _
º!¡ > z Z" "'"' .. D k.':, ~ J
Z I! -i i 0 Z lit "';I:!!: YIHII"":r i! Z II i ,..ILCT #' ~
;¡ I~ "' i ~ it SA iA~DIIZ> 1i~i:Ÿ¿!; "' ~I lea Ii !!! IE ä i"'~ c: is
~ ~~ 2~ J ~ ~ ~ '"':ëJ>ö J;..!!!!Y DII § II I i = j HC ND[f~~ ,~~ G) Þ
> ..~ .. > ~ A ECT = Ie ~ = i;¡ þH II\' ~þ~ :J> ~
~ · !!I ,", Z ~n õ"" .- 10 IA., II ~ ~O' ~
c ,...:~~Yrp'!~1- . ..2..l!! ..! . ,- I!IJ.!:. ~.-. ~. f
r ) STY ADifi.,,,~ ¡ 1 ,. . Oil II~ Ct.":An. Þ j~ j ~~ WHITLlYIID CI!:' æ ... ::¡
~ ...... ~ 6 ~ ..-.- - ~ '" ~ qt.... ..("
A A", ft: '" ~ Oil ~ YNuA.... DII ,.. u, ".,-. ~ m);- <:. to. æ '. ~ æ z II: I~ ::¡ %
J x"'~ ~ ~~.. \~, DII "' !1 WOODALE DII æ", -C :n ~...~1Moanllll~ g = ~ C) .. : a ì ~ ~ WlLLSL "
,.~, ~ ~-~~. 0·4 ~ ~~" ~ ð ~ !1 IEIINADINElT "' ~ - rLII~i C" N1 lIaA01:) ~ E ~ ~ j I I ~ ; J MAlIK 11 1.1 ;¡i~i:
· ~ cr f) ..~~H¡ >ji MIEIIOIIY LN VAIL MEADOW 2 ft. j .., )'ftuII.. ~- ~ ~" Aa J ~ : ; i i i J j u...
~~ ~I i ., ('I "y~~ f ~ g i 0 _~~3 ~: N ~~ I !aM AD~fU!! I ~ a MÌÃ~OJ...,IO. 011 I ,_',~,t
I Ii i ~ ~.. ~ ~ 'S .. ~- ~. \ .c ~ ~\r~, IIY II! i I ! '8 Ii " KATIE LN E,'),
~I~ ~ ~ \~.I}¡n- \ ~ ~~ + """- t. - OH,LHN ! ~8 ~ 11 ~ ~ LAZYIllDOK " I /' =,:<,.
'YlAo" );~O ~i ~- ~ (~ ~ .L...L., - t--. 1& "k. I III i J _IEIIIIY'"OftK'" r I 'i
~ · a i=~ ~'fUfÐ Z · º«I~ ~ ~A~~." 3 04 I OOIC 011 .I ~_ -i:'",i" J
= en ' i 0; 1 6J:>~ '" Mlcn iD __ If' ',¡';it;': >-;.
~ :. ~ , \- ,;:, ~ ""........- II VlLLAQ Iii'. - '-",
\d~' D' \ \i .... 011 Is _,
1. enD ¡2 'If Þ Þ i I '¡/fI,!
. \. ' l' - '!i.; WATAUGA C I'Y LIMITS I! .. ..._ ..."'... "'" "' _
¡ I.\. i ~ ! NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CI LIMITS ,.
...¡¡
A
-...;:<,:<,~ ,
i
~
II
.
B
l
I
Y
--
HALTOM CITY CITY LIMITS
~
~
J
.. ..
lIt pi
~ :D
ñ
~ :z:
C ~
Ii) Z
> 0
E :z:
C ¡::
Z ,..
ñ (I
;:¡ n
> ::¡
,.. ~
n :z:
0 >
E ,..
" ,..
,..
m
)C
................
,.,.. fIt:-" !:I"":'" lIt lIt,.,.. fIt:-"
ZZZZ:Z::Z::Z::Z:III~!!!~~
gggg¡!!:¡!!:¡!!:¡!!:~¡::~OmÞ
~~~~aaaa:5~:5Q~E
E E E E ,..,.. Ii). ,.. -I ñi m
:D:D:D:D ;;ñi~:D
££££~~~~:C~ (I 0
,..!"",..,..~~~~_O;!:!!Š'"
>Þ» -EIII:D(In
~~~~!$$~~~~~~~
:Z::Z::Z::z:mmm~(I (I:D>E
¡::¡::¡::¡:::D(I(I:z:n~n~"'m
,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. ,.. >-1 ~ > :z:. :z: Z :D
(I(I(I(I~-I-I"'OnO- n
-. "'OOOZ m
:!!:!!:!!EOõÕ ,..Ii)
:D:D:DCþ:DZZ Iñc(I
(I n
mmm!Ii)__ >mþm
(I(I(InmN.. OC-IZ
~~~:o I:I:F;
:!:!:!,..", Z m:D
OOOn$ ~ ~
ZZZOm :D
---!~ ~ ~
WN....r:¡: Õ ~
m-l Z 0
)Cõ
Z III ûì
C -I
¡:: >
o 0
Z c:
Ii) .!
-- .. .,.
':4
m
E
"
o
:D
>
:D
~
,..
o
n
>
-I
Õ
.!
-a%
O~
-~
ZO
-t~
tn,
O::D
-nñ
-%
Z'"
-t:Þ
mZ
::DC
m:þ
tn::D
-tm
:Þ
-
w
...,;;:-;'YM
TEJ!i4S 4 PACIFIC
- ~~
- ~ T
"- -----.. ~ ~ ,0 DENTON
~_l.~ _~~
'Ç./ -'- ~-
'--
-,.....
I -I
j;~('
.J
CITY OF WATAUGA
INTER-QFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
TO
City Council
DATE 6-11-85
FROM
Mayor Anthony
SUBJECT
Annexation
-
d
The letter attached is from the Pastor ~f Spring Valley Baptist
Church who's congregation has voted unanimously requesting
annexation by the City of Watauga.
So that each of you are aware, I am a trustee of Spring Valley
Baptist Church. I voted for annexation to the City of Watauga.
In no way, will I monetarily benefit from any action the Council
takes concerning the church's request.
Prior to receiving the attached request, the City Attorney advised
me that annexation research had taken a lower priority because
of the latest lawsuit against the City and individual Council
Members. I agree with his advise.
However, the City of Watauga may not have another opportunity to
annex land on the City's west boundary. I believe it will behove
the Council to act on this request as soon as possible. I am
requesting the City Attorney to advise the Council if the requested
annexation can be discussed in closed session at the June 24,1985
council meeting.
cc: City Manager
City Attorney
poMtor:
[ N DARTER
: )8 RultV Dell
~Worth, TX 76111
Phone:
I 71838-157157
("I/II4t
~ 1~
7h~
jßpriug ~aIIe~ ~apti5t C!tlyurrly
5179 WATAUGA ROAD· FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76137
May 29, 1985
City of Wautaga
Attention: Mayor Virgil Anthony
Dear Mayor Anthony:
The members of Spring Valley Baptist Church have voted
unanimously to petition the city of Watauga for annex-
ation.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
May God Bless You.
Sincerely,
ß II Ii4A~i:¡-
~r ~ ..
\ .~ -r-- ",//
/¡( )-1'~f',017 ¿ I
Secretary
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
L .'. Department:
'-'SUbject:
Administration CoUncil Meeting Date: 6/24/85
Eminent D0nl4inPÌ\~.éd1nS'for Flory Street.~tø,¡J.¢.t-Agenda Number: GN 85-64
Resolution No¡.>8s,..13
The Staff has been abl~~i..o~~cn.seiåll right-of"'waY~P1">t1)~·iFlory Street project with
one exception. We ba!i~<notbeenable to reach any agX'e"l1twitb Mary Jo Gaston, who
resides in San Antonio.
Council authorizationisrieqÛ1.reò,toc:iirectthe City·Att()t.'t1~Y.t() proceed with eminent
domain proceedings.
Recommendation:
Authorize City Attorney to iøittate etninent domain pr()(:e~èI;ln¡sfor property belonging to
MS. Mary Jo Gaston.
¡
~
~'-
~
L
Bønds(GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other>
----
Finance Review'
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
----
ti~~, \....'
. ./ ..., ,., ...
Department HeadSlgnatute J City Manager
CITitCOtJNCIL ACT/ONi/rEM
~
. Finance Director
Paoe 1 of
I
-'-
RESOLUTION NO. 85-13
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that:
1.
The City Attorney is hereby authorized to acquire right-of-way for
the Flory Street project by eminent domain proceedings against the following:
(a) Lots 9 and 10, Jack M. Estes Subdivision owned by Mary Jo
Gaston:
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of June, 1985.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
"-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Purchasing./i
prevailing~~~.)~å.teDetermination -
Ordinance Np"v1240
Council Meeting Date: 6/24/85
AgendaNumber: PU 85-21
SUbject:
On June 10, 1985 Coünc:i+;,~.rde~aCQntract for constructiOt\0f the new fire station to
be located on Starnes.~d.iitot.angI;~tz"'Wilkerson in the. a1!1()'Ontof$229, 800.
~
~
!
~
~-
~.
~ Source of Funds:
~
~
!
L
Inadvertently, theest.D~i$htn~~~>()faPrevailing Wage aate'Wa.;not included in the
request for City co~Ç~J.~~it~~~.< :rnaccordance with.Art1e~e~159a of the Revised Civil
Statues,. the COUnCiltnUjtJPpr!~eaXtordinance establishingaiprevailing rate.
Attached is a proposedP~trY'áil1~11l.,ge Rate determinat1011(.t1bic~is identical to rates
established by the City~fF~t~~~~'"and is believedtot)e~pplicable in North
Richland Hills. The contractorha$i~dicated that this wage rate determination is
acceptable to him. '
Recommendation: It ist~*o"eI14e~t:bat the City Counci!adoptOrdinance No. 1240
establishing a Prevai11ngWage.~te.
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/A
Sufficient Funds Available
Ü1Ø~~~r
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Dlrec'or
Paqe 1 of
1
--
ORDINANCE NO. 1240
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, that:
1.
The wages shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part
hereof, be and are hereby approved and adopted as the Prevailing Wage Rate for
those occupantions shown on said Exhibit "A".
2.
The Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of June, 1985.
Mayor
Attest:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
"-
-
EXHIBIT "A"
------.
City of North Richland Hills
Prevailing Wage Rates
Trade/Craft Recommended
Standard Rates
1. Bricklayers & Stone Masons
Bricklayer $8.71
Precast Erector 6.27
Helper/Laborer 5.52
2. Carpenters
Acoustical/Drywall 8.27
Finish 8.71
Form 8.27
Rough 7.57
Helper/Laborer 5.07
3. Cement Masons
Finish 6.88
Rough/Form Setter 5.50
Helper/Laborer 5.07
4. Electricians
Electrician 9.59
Helper/Laborer 5.07
5. Elevator Constructors
Mechanic in Charge 8.64
Mechanic 7.25
Helper/Laborer 5.52
6. Floor Covering Workers
Journeyman/Craftsman 8.71
Helper/Laborer 5.07
7. Glaziers
Journey/Craftsman 7.25
Helper/Laborer 5.07
"- 8. Insulators/Asbestos Workers
Journeyman/Craftsman 6.27
Helper/Laborer 5.07
-- '''"--
Trade/Craft Recommended
Standard Rates
9. Iron Workers
Structural $7.25
Rebar 6.27
Helper/Laborer 5.07
Boilermakers 9.59
Helper/Laborer 5.07
10. Labors
Skilled 5.52
Unskilled 5.07
11. Lathers
Journeyman/Craftsman 7.57
Helpers/Labors 5.52
12. L.W. Concrete Roofdeck Workers
Purnpman 6.88
Tank Operator 5.54
Hoseman 5.54
Finisher 6.88
Laborers 5.07
13. Metal Building Assemblers
Journeyman/Craftsman 7.25
Helper/Laborer 5.07
14. Millwrights
Journeyman/Craftsman 7.25
Helper/Laborer 5.07
15. Painters
Craftsman(brush & spray) 7.57
Craftsman(tape & float) 8.71
Helper/Laborer 5.52
16. Plasterers
Journeyman/Craftsman 8.71
Helper/Laborer 5.52
~-
'-- Trade/Craft
Recommended
Standard Rates
17. Plumbers and Pipefitters
Plumbers
Pipefitter
Welder
Helper/Laborer
Air Condo Mechanic
$9.59
9.59
8.71
5.07
9.59
18. Power Equipment Operators
Operator(crane,cherry picker)
Operator(tampers, mixers)
7.04
6.08
19. Roofers
Craftsman/Journeyman 8.71
Helper/Laborer 5.07
20. Sheet Metal Worker
Journey/Craftsman 8.75
Helper/Laborer 5.07
?/
21. Sprinkler Fitters
Journeyman/Craftsman 9.59
Helper/Laborer 5.07
22. Sound/TV & Alarm
Chief Technician 7.97
Sr. Journeyman/Craftsman 7.25
Journeyman/Craftsman 6.27
23. Terrazzo Workers
Journeyman/Craftsman 8.71
24. Tilesetters
Journeyman/Craftsman
8.71
L
L
I
II CITY OF ~
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
Public Works
Department:
6-10-85
Oøuncll Meeting Date:
PW 8s-18
L
L
L
\ Subject:
L~ The bid tabulations for
the original estimates.
Holiday Lane.
Bid Tabulation
Agenda Number:
"......'\:',,
Chapman· oad, attached to the engineer '.s . letter , were higher
Also i'n luded as an alternate bid itèmwas the widening of
than
'," ' , ' " , - .
,--. .. ." . -
'>,"1 , , ' , '",' "':""',::-}~_"_'::,"
APAC-Texas, Inc. isthei~~~1ct4.t' on the job at 400 calendar days which is probably
excessive time and theYi~v_!a11.'Wed themselves plenty oft~lIetoavoid the $500 a day
liquidated damages. Tb,e<'~sc~ll neous street and drail14,ei'79t1f:1:actwhich APAC has at this
time includes the street~111;)NQ'r.hHills Addition. Eveø.~lt~u,ghtl1ey have plenty of time
left on that job we arei\4l.V1:n$a,ha't'dtime keeping themon<~hejob on a day-to-day basis.
/
/':,',' :"':'>.' -" ---':'::".- '- -,',,:. ','"
If this bid is awardedtC)i~A¢"'1'.JCa...tnc., in all probab111.tY~he C.ity Manager and/or
myself will sit down. and>'~ave.an.underøtanding with APACthåt they must stay on the job
when it is possible to .doso.
Staff's recommendationl~~()a'ppovè the bid. of APAC-Texs.s,>J;ne.in. the amount of
$1,592,207.88 for rebuil~111gCha man Road and the widening..ofjioliday Lane south of
Chapman Road and the all~~a'tion. . ffunds for bothprojectø to include engineering and
right of way as summari~eèi below
A sU1IDI1ary of the originalibud_et.s.1:\dthe proposed funding sou.rce·is listed as follows:
Chapman Road
~~
~
~~
L
1.
2.
3.
4.
Engineering
Right of Way
Construction
Utility Adjustment
Holiday Lane
1.
2.
Engineering
Construction
Total
Original Budget
Contract Amount
$
125,360.75
13,509.42
1,054,277.83
-0-
$
149,200.00
13,509.42
1,332,075.48
140,677.50
-0-
90,000.00
$1,283,158.00
$
15,000.00
119,454..90
$1,769,917 .30
Proposed Funding Source. ......,<. ., ".'...., , ,.. .', .
The original budget asspe~ifie($bYthe.CIPCommitteeOnMarch>l2,. 1985 as
above is not sufficient. to cover the contract amounts plus engineering and
way costs.
Depa.rtment Head Slgnàtu e
C TY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Both
described
right of
Finance Review
See Above
. Finance Director
PaQe 1 of
2
L.
Total
to determin_tf/funds1l.re available for the
nt funds are availab:i._..but <a realignment of budget
j_cts.use of escrowfurui~.tor Chapman Road, and use
A summary is list_da.follo1ls:
I
L
¡\......
L
L
An analysis of the.CIP
two proposed projects
appropriation for
of interest
L
¡
I
'--
1. Chapman R~ad
2. Holiday Lane
$1.193,148.00
90,000.00
,148.00
L
Funds held in escrow
for Chapman Road
717.55
I
L
Misc. street overlay
paid by General Fund
000.00
¡
L
Appropriation of General
CIP unspecified balance
135,919.35
Utility CIP unspecified
L fund balance
· - Total proposed alloèationi
lAO, 677.50
$1,775,462.40
L
Cha man Road
L
L
13-00-48-4200
13-00-48-6050
13-00-48-6150
09-00-76-6700
Enjineering
R::f.ght of Way
Construction
Utility Adjustments
$ 149,200.00
13,509.42
1,332,075.48
140,677.50
Total appropriation Chap~n
$1,635,462.40
Holida Lane
~.
L
L
13-00-55-4200 Engineering
13-00-55-6150 r Construction
Total appropriationHOliday~ane
Total allocation both.,pt'ojecs
$ 15,000.00
125,000.00
$140,000.00
L
Recommendation:
It is recommended that.theCi
1) Award a cont:!:act; f()r.ëI.¡>nta;n~oad and Holida,y,t,a.näwideningand improvements
to APAC Texas ili the a ()untof $1,592,207.88, ð.íld
2) Approve the fundili9',~ 11Ócations described·above
$1,775,462.40
L
L
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
L
,}
.
/ _;;rJ8
~c;
KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
June 4, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-334, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CHAPMAN DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
BID TABULATION
In accordance with your instructions, bids were received on June
the referenced project. This project includes paving, drainage,
improvements on Chapman Drive from Rufe Snow to Smithfield Road.
individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the
indicates, bids were received from three (3) contractors.
4, 1985, for
and utility
The
tabulation
The low bid submitted was from APAC - TEXAS, INC., P.O. Box 1807, Fort Worth,
Texas 76101, in the amount of $1,592,207.88, for a period of 400 calendar
,days. The engineer IS estimate was $1,316,000. The second low. bid was'
submitted by Austin Road in the amount of $1,656,634.35, (a difference of
~ $64,426.47), for a period of 425 calendar days. These bid totals include an
additive alternate for widening Holiday Lane from a 36-foot section to a
49-foot section just south of Chapman Drive. For your information the pre-bid
engineer IS estimate tabulation is also attached for comparison of the
estimated unit prices with the actual bid prices. The largest differences
appear to be in higher than expected asphalt and storm drain pipe costs.
The low bid consists of the following sections:
Street and Drainage. .
Utility Adjustments. .
Miscellaneous. . . .
Holiday Lane Widening
. . . .
$ 1,297,455.98D-
140,677.50
34,619.5
119,454.90
$ 1,592,207.88
1332- ð/7..s: ~~
I , /
· . . . .
· . .
TOTAL AMOUNT BID . . .
· . . . .
The low bidder, APAC - TEXAS, has worked extensively throughout the Metroplex,
and we are not aware of any engineering considerations sufficient to preclude
award of the project to this Contractor. APAC is presently under contract
with NRH for work on Miscellaneous Street and Drainage Improvements in the
North Hills area and other locations.
Therefore, on the basis of the bids submitted, we would recommend that this
Page 1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG,. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
',-
"
Mayor and City Council
Chapman Bids
June 4, 1985
contract be awarded to APAC - TEXAS, INC. in the amount of $1,592,207.88 for
a period not to exceed 400 calendar days. The Public Works Director has
suggested that you may wish to negotiate with the Contractor to lower the
Contract Completion Time if you feel it is excessive. We would note that
liquidated damages have been set for $500.00 per day for each d~y over the
Contract Completion Time of 400 days.
Because the bids were higher than anticipated, you may wish to consider
deleting the Holiday Lane widening from this Contract if funds are not
presently available for this project -- please consult with Lee Maness in this
. regard.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may
have concerning this project.
RI~f:!:-/fr ~
--
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager " , ,
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works" nilSC()EGfQß
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of P~lic Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
, Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Page 2
Z
0
l-
e::
--'
=>
CO
-, - e::
I-
0
CO
u
z
-
V)-
c¿
UJ
~
0 '"
w~ ~
8
I
.,- .:;
v, ,:;
~-! $
U
,...<- ,
1..'~ if>
t:
7- Z
0 C5
t::; '6
'-',
3; z
¡:
0 ~
-/
..- :;
,,..
..... u
,
ftt·\?:_r.~ :~..~
" , )',.~ ~fr...-II
t,;~_:,~·)~::':·";.
if:hYjfi
.~':d_ ~:.J)
...;
> 0 I-
« .- V)
·0 0
zxU) U
~ Ol-r--....
I- V1 '"
'-'- --' .- '"
0 «O::Z N
:J: 0:: 0 I
.... 0- « I- ....
V1:J:(! '" lJJ
I- « z: N I-U
w r-- .- I --
W 00--' r-. zcr::
:J: cr::oo:: .... ::J a..
V1 V).... « co
M
....
o .....
W L() >< \.c
COI-r-.M
ON r--
cCN _ M
o :z:: N
O:XI- I
o 0:: U)
ZCOO M
- :;¡¡: M
1-. I
~O.. ,......
~a:t;: ;:ri
....
o
.-
r-. X '"
V10¡.....,.....,......
«CO N
X~ .. U"')
w :z:: 0
I-XI- I
o 0:: '"
IceO (Y)
:3: M
U· I
c( 0.. ,......
~a:t;: ;:ri
?)w
o <.!:I
.... «
z
,. .-
w «
:2:0:
_0
I-
~I~
¢<.!:I
I Z
'" .-
>
..«
lJJ c..
I-
e::W
0>
.-
OO::Z
~il-
--' 0- 0::
_«a..
:Z:::J::2:
u
o
Z 0'
« z
--' 0
:J: .-
U I-
.- 0-
cr:: .-
cr::
:J: U
I- V)
0:: W
00
Z
~~I
>- I
I-M
-
U..
..0
cr::Z
W
Z CO
3: 0
0'-:>
l1)
~
...........
\J)
'-....
~
~ Z
0
-
I-
a..
.-
0::
U
V)
W
0
0 25
LJJ
:><: I-
U -
~
U
0
Z
e::
V) >-
o CO
.-
CC
W
l-
e::
o
OOOO~OOOO~OCO~OOOO~~O~OOOOO 0
~OOON(y)O~OMO~~OOm~O~(Y)~qMO~O 0
· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,.....,qOOM~~~~O~~NOOOO~ro~~~~MN~~O a
MqOOMNM,.....,~NNMOOOOM~,.....,~~~~OOO~O ~
o~ro~~aM,......Nrn~~mmMOONONOO~~NNa,....., ~
.. " .. .. .. 1ft .. .. 1ft .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1ft ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ..
M~MN,.....,a~~N~OO~~OM,.....,~~OM~~,......~,.....,O rn
o ~ ,.....,~~qro~~~~~NM~O~,....., M~
~ M~ ~~
-
oooo~~ooo~o¢~oooo~~o~o~ooo 0
"'ooo"''''~'''o~~r-.r-.OO....M'''__CO''''''O~O 0
~~ÒONÒM~OOÓO~M~~~~~~~å~~~~~ 0
00 ,....., M ~~OOOM~~,....., U"')
oo~ ~~N,.....,~ ~
MN rl~N m
l-
V)
o
U
"'NOO~~N...."''''CC'''~OCC~'''COM....'''r--OOOO
Nr-.COq~M~CCCr-.~r--ON...."'O....~r-."'....OOO
· .. . .. . , . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . ..
"'CCOONON"''''M....M'''MMMNN....OMM~~r-.N
~,.....,~~~~N~~N~~~~N~~~N~~OO~OOO~
OO~MMOO~M~~~~~~M~ro~ooo~mo~~~~
.. .. .. .. " till .. " .. .. .. " .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '" .. .. 1ft 1ft .. "
~~v¢~roMOON~OO~M~MN~~OOOO~~~~v
o ~~~ rn~ NMNNN~OOM~ ~~
~ N~ ~ ~
o
o
o
c:o
N
·
~
-
W
1-<->
--
zcr::
::J a.
NCCOo~r--CCr-.r-.M~r--¢O"''''....NMr-.....M~OOO
NMOOO~....~~~OCC~O"''''r-.r-.OCO¢NOOOO
· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~~OONON~OOOONM~~MMN~M~~M~~OO
~~ ~ M M¢~~NOVM
MM ~~N~
~~ ~NM
o
o
·
o
CO
N
¢
l-
V)
8
"'OOO~OO~OON~OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
~roOON~CCr-.O"'~CC~OO"'M~OOOOOOOO
M~åå~~~~ò~~~~~~oo¢~~~~ååòåo
~~OOOO~~~~q~NroONNOOOMMOOO~OOO
¢~NN~~mOOOO~~MN~~~~~~~~~~~¢¢
" .. .. .. .. .. 1ft .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. ... ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. A
mNv~~~N~rn~~¢NOOOO~N~N~NN~ao
~ ~ v~~ ~~~OMNNM~~v~ ~~
M.....-4 f'"""4 ~
o
o
o
o
r-.
·
'"
W
I-U
........
zcr::
::J a..
-
~~OO~~~~OO"'~OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
MNOOror--~NOMOO~OO~r-."'oooooooo
· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~NOO~O~~~OOMM~~MMN~N~O~OOO
00 r-- M ~~~ONOOO
NN f'"""4~~¢~
~~ ....NN
o
o
o
o
r-.
'"
~
Z-
e::1-
--' z
a..«
::J
MV~~~N¢MOOM ~~MOO~mm~M~mN~~~ ~
M~ ONNOOmNN~OOOf'"""4~MM~¢~NOO N
~.... CO~~COr-.CO¢OOM~~COro"'NM~~
"'N A.......
-.::t~ N~"""O'I 0"1 ..("I'jN I,,(')C()LOCQ ~~
...... r-t M MI..DOM ......
'" ....
I-
....
Z
=>
........ .... .........:r::r::z:
>->-V)V1~'-'-~>Z»>->-Z~~'-'-'-'-~'-'-'-'-~'-'-UUU
· . . . . . . '0 . . . '0 . . . , . . . , .«<cc:c:
UU--'--'~V1~V1I-V1V)V)V)I-~V1V1V1--'~~~--'WWW
.::.!
):
+>
V)
--'
.... .
+> ....
V) +>
V).... ....
VI ..:J. ..::,¿4-
.:J.(. QJ ..- '+- . cQ 'to- 4- C!) ~
U '-"r-QJc:4--....~~.........ca
.,.... :::> QJ Q)'''''' C "0 co co '"0 .........
,C: <1J ;.> <1J.....t:J ........ .0 "0
~ CO I- û~V1œ&~]]Æ~+>tt~
:5 "0 ~ .~ ....:....: .-;:-JJ~"'">~~c~~
o ~ c~ ~~~~ur-m"~>c~~>
~~ ~ ~~~u ~·,....cuu»u~~
~~L~ ~ ~ow·_~·-w~cx~~xu ~~~
c ~~m ~ -....u~~ ~~ ~wuuwx~~~·_r-
O~ ~V) r- ?:: ut-'-"C:C: fill xx L.&.J~::s='~QJ
'r- c: -IooJ +-J +oJ >-. V> Q) .::,¿ I'tI C . '" ... . W w. ::J U U ~ QJ
+J CU fti ttS ::J,- +oJ "0 +oJ U 0..= 0 .,...... t.. VI __ ..-' u c +..>
rc =: t.!' >..- QJ rtj rö ~ F N ._ r- U QJ.:¥. U . . U,- (1) Q) V")
~ ~ r t"O ...~.;§ ~8 t- 8"C ."': ~ ~ t m ~ u u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t: ,
u~w~c~~~~ ~ wV)~ ~~ ~c ~~___O~
x..o > > rO >,V1.........:;, aJ...-U+oJ ~ At.,!) OJ .........Þ-I A _a.. a... +.J c:
W¿]r;'";.c Ec.( ~V1.~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~f:j ..a...~c.."'¡ J: bV')'Q;
-IooJ UULO~~~~~z~~~~_~~a...u~ucÞ-lÞ-lw~
æÞx ><8 ,,0 ~ ~a..~_å...~ E> (lJ_~cx..-..cx7Þ~ ~ .
~.,... 0 0 VI QJ 0,.. .,.... V') = U 0 ::3 c::¡ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ +-J V') V'I r- ..-
~~ro~~~~'-r-~~OO ~~ oW~_>Þ-I>~rO~a...u
V') C c::: r- QJ._.,.... > 0:: =" . Cot- ~ --. > Þ-I ~....... rd U U I c::
Cl) . ,.,.... ~ t.....CJ..o=> uu= u u U CÞ-I
"Oc~~.µ-o u ro rQ I::r: '-CX:<:I:~ c= . C:-I-I--I-1--1 ""O~~
C1J I/'IV'lV')V1C::.4-J~<IO~:ENaUOUUUUU"'O~t...I"
._~._._.,... o~~wc.(_~X ucu_____~~m+JM
~C1Jxxx+..>u w ~ 0 ~~~~~
.- __ LU W LJ.J V'I Q.J \... '- ... _ _ ~ u ..::,¿ . . "'0 t:: t= ~ +
11'1..- ·_-IooJ""Ooo~<co~u U~~~~~cro~u~
Lf) 0 (lJ QJ CIJ >( ::3 rc 4- 0 = = = Ç...._ ..,...._.,...,....,.....,... rtj ~ ~ ......
1'1:1 \.., > > >\.J.JU \... 0 :::J..c~J::coooc~V')V')=
....+>000 rn~MN~<1J~UI-I-I- V) N'
UC:"'EE>J:.cE,'a.a.a. ===== -- I/O
58~&~Æ~a~~~ççç~~~~~~~~~~~~ro~
....
lL.
--
.::.!
U
00
o~
++
.... r-.
"" '"
U
c:
o
U
.s:;
I-
+>
/0
~N~~~~~oo~ó~~~~~~~ro~å~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~"""~NNNNNNNN
.....
----.
v
~
V)
r.>:
u.J
~
9:
Wt (5
ï.::;
v;~
:J -
LJ .0
Z -
~~
0,"'- ()
z
Su
3: ~
o~
Zo
~L v
~}~~Wf~jl:1
~;J¡\"~ \J ·~:S;V
<!I"
lL.
o
N
f-
LL!
LL!
:r:
V1
.
LL!
::> 0
e:( ....
·0
Z><<D
0)- ,.......1"""'4
f- V1 rn
--I....... " C"'I
e:(O:::Z N
:r:o::o ,
0... c:r: t- .......
V1:r:W <D
e:( :z N
....- I
00-1 ....
0:::00::: 1"""'4
(/)..-ic;( co
M
. ....
o .....
ULnXIO
COf-....M
ON ....
c:(N ~ M
o :r: N
0:: >< f- I
o 0:: <D
:ZCOO M
- :3 M
f-. I
V') o. ,...."
~a:t;: ~
:z
o
....
o
.....
.... >< lD
V)0f-.......
e:( CO N
><..-t #II L.{')
LL! :r: 0
f-><f-
o 0:: <D
I c::J 0 (V)
:3 M
U I
C::::C:O· ,....."
~a:t;: ~
f-
e:(
.;.J
:::>
CO
""
f-
o
~!LL!
at.!]
.--. e:(
z
~~
:Eo::
_0
f-
~I~
-=rW
I Z
lD .....
::>
.. e:(
LL! "-
f-
e:( LL!
o ::> V1
..... f-
oö:::z
-ow
CO ,:E
:zu.¡
~~~
.;.J t:L IX
.....<:(0-
:r::r:::'.:
w....
CO
o
Z
e:( :z
-10
:r: ....
W f-
- "-
cr:: ....
cr::
:r: w
f- V1
cr::w
00
Z
~~I
>- I
f- M
.....
W
..0
0:: Z
LL!
Zc::J
:30
0'-:>
o
w
,,¿
w
w
:r:
w
o
:z
<:(
o
w
V1 >-
o CO
....
CO
~
"'-
~
...........
~
LL!
f-
<:(
o
~
f-
V)
8
LL!
f-U
..........
:z 0::
:::> "-
l-
V)
8
LL!
f-U
-.....
:z 0::
:::>"-
l-
V)
o
U
LL!
f-U
..........
:z 0::
:::> "-
~
:z .....
<:(f-
-I :z
"- e:(
:::>
f-
.....
:z
:::>
o
o
o
o
lD
M
.....
o
o
o
o
lD
M
o
o
o
....
N
M
-
o
o
o
-
N
M
o
o
.
o
o
co
M
.....
o
o
o
o
co
M
....
V)
.J
o
o
·
o
U">
o
.;
o
o
o
Ln
o
<!I"
o
o
·
o
.....
N
M
o
o
o
....
N
M
o
o
o
o
co
M
o
o
·
o
o
co
M
....
.ñ
·
.;.J
o
o
o
o
-
.;
o
o
Ô
o
-
<!I"
o
o
o
-
N
~
M
o
o
o
-
N
M
o
o
å
o
-
~
<!I"
o
o
å
o
-
<!I"
-
.
V1
.
.;.J
o
o
.
o
o
U">
.;
0000
oU">oo
QI"'---MU")
O-=:tor:::tN
00 co r--.
.. t'\ .. ...
¢\..O~c:;T
0....
oCO
NN
r- co
M '"
.... rn
co
<!I"
~
-
-
o
co
o
~
QJ
I/) '"
<-''-
QJ-I
-'" '"
<-. 0
<t1~ "
~ c: o.
o ",lL.
uU >.'
'r- U V>
t~ ....0
c'Or- CJ'10
~,...... VIa
f-QJ <t1_
~ I'd ra /'OaJl'O >- s...........
~,....t..r-\...,-~QJL,-QJ ~
OQJOQJOQJO,,",OQJ>QJ I/)
OJ OJ OJ (/) QJ 'r-' r- I'd ..D
C~C~t:t;t: .ct;t-g -g-J
o 0 0 0....0 QJO <=N
.µc ..¡....I ".µ ..µ C:.¡..J .,.-0 C
V') "+- VJ 4- V1 ~ V> Or-' V> 4- 4- ......... OJ +J
c:: c: c: OJ CaJ CCtO
QJ.,... QJ'r- Q)'r- Q) 0::: Q)'r- e::= en
UQJUQJU<UU UQ) '" "'''
res 0::: I'tI 0::: CCI 0::: to "1"0 e:::: _'r- 0 C1J
r- r- ....- r- r- r- co c.. E 'r-
'T ,..: '7 -= '; -= O¡- ~ 7 -= co'~ ~ ð 0.0
c: u c: u c u c: -. c: U L. +.) to U a........
........c........c........c:¡o....¡ _c::oV>,- c(CCI
I-I........'-INI-......... a...r:
.µ .µ .µ .µ...µ ~oðl-
VI M VI OJ V'i L.(') VI f...O VI co c(..¡...J c ',- Z
to -q- n:I CT\ t'CI 0'\ to I.D IT.'I Lf") CJ:: E'r- ::..-..::J
uòud;u~UrtU;t;~6::_ rng~
_ -d" = oc:t = \D = ...0 = ,....... - .- c:,...... c:::(
o 0 0 <:) 0 , 0'"" >,
'7 ~ '7 ~ '7 ,; '7 ,; '7 ,; ~~ ~ ã3 t eï!
_ +J. .µo_ +-'- ~- .+-J :;:o.,C,1 0 Q) rot-
Ll>V1Ll>V1Ll>V1Ll>V1Ll>V1f-cr::f-V100
f-
I
co
:::>
V1
:z
o
-
f-
"-
.....
0::
W
V1
LL!
o
25
t-
.....
...
<t1
...
--
'"
<t1
>
'"
.
co
N
...
<t1
...
--
'"
<t1
>
'"
rn
N
...
<t1
...
--
'"
<t1
>
'"
.
o
M
o
o
.
o
o
U">
<!I"
00Ll>0
O_NO
· . . .
O<!l"OLl>
o N
o
<!I"
o
o
<!I"
'"
-=r
M
OLl><!I"_
0"" co 0'\
0"".... (;0
~....-tN q.
NC'\I..ON
.. .. ... ..
(Y')L(') r-'I ("'I'")
o
o
<!I"
N
<!I"
M
O....NO'I
OON....
· . . .
Ovo....
- -
N
M
o
o
o
o
U">
<!I"
0Ll>00
ONOO
Qr-'lMO
o M<;t co
r-t I..l1 a::> ,......
~ LO r-'I M
o
o
o
o
U">
<!I"
OLOLOO
a,...."NO
· . . .
OMOO
o N
.-.
<;t
-
.... Ll> N rn
.... .... co
<!I" (V) -
~ ~
r-'I""'" r-'I t
V1
.J
·X . .
V1UlL.>-
· e:(
.;.JLL!-IW
...
<t1
...
<t1
...
""'
--
::J
<t1
>
....
'"
<t1
>
'"
'"
.
-
M
.
N
M
. . . .
("¥"') -=:t L/') '-0
MMMM
Ll> 0
0....
· .
<;t 0
N \0
r- M
rn lD
U">
M
~
....
-
r--
\0
·
Lt')
OCO
00'1
· .
o Ll>
M Ll>
<!I" <!I"
~ ~
M....
rn
N
-
-
o
o
N
Ll>
-
r-
~
>-
·
V1
Ll>00000000
NLt')_OOOOOO
~c:Öååoåoåo
N<!I"NOOO<;tOO
N"d"NLONNoe;;;r.......N
.. .. .. .. .. ... .. ... ..
MML.f')oq-MLO....-t....-tL.{')
lD
-
Ll>Lt')OOOOOOO
,N...._OOOOOO
~oo-=ôòòåoå
N_NOOO<DLt')O
LnI.Qt""')MI.OC"'l
c::t r-I r-'I r-I
Lt')OMCOONCOCOO
<DLt')CO-MO'\<!I"rnO
· . . . . . . . .
<!I"NN <!I" 0 MCOrnN
N........-iLONNOON
o;.~~~~~~~m'"
NNLONMLONr-'I<e::T
<D
.....
....Lt')MCOLt')CONrnO
......f"'oo,....................cnr-to,,\Ln
· . . . . . . . .
OM_<;tOLt')N<;tO
N_NLt')'D0 Lt')Lt')M
........<!I"Lt')r--N
N..........- rl
000000000
00Lt')000000
· . . . . . . . .
00....000000
COO<!l"OOOCOOO
<!I"COLt')....NCOCONN
'" .. .. .. .. .. .. " ...
MMO"iNNMr-'lr-'lL[')
lD
-
000000000
00Ll>000000
';o~ååoóoå
NNNOOLl>....OO
r""'Il'""'1(j\.q-I..OC"">
N- -
Ll>O__N<!I"VNV
<!I" rn rn
........0
~
M
· . .:I::l:X:r=:z::r=
lL.1.L.lL.UUUUUU
· . .o<r:e:(<:(o<:(e:(e:(
-J-I-Ju.JWLLJWLJ.JW
x
oxx
COOo
c::J co
........""
.:,¿.>.f. "" ""
QJ ,..- co co OJ
C..-................>QJQ)
OJ 'r- "t:I "'0.....- :> >
r-4-..c~rør-r-
~~Jjt5>~~
.µro..................01
QJ a:> > > '" en en
>. ronj·_Cc
r- oð U U 0..''-'_
o xxc.o.o.
a.. .WL.I.JtöQ.c.
......" f-<t1<t1
3: .0 f- f-
OJJJ~uCo=
0. "''''......CO<D
0: =~t-4 ~~~
>QJQJQJ xx
~ C'Ø c.. 0.......- OJ OJ 0 0
OJ U'r- 'r- "0 > > ca CCI
~x"-"-"Q)Q)
ro:LL.I ro Q) QJ-,:J""O
3 LLV>r-""'-CC
.~~ V>V)fCitd
V') .,..... 3::3: C')
~t-4U c:rntnQJQJ
z . c: u U 'r- c: c: > > ~
L..LJ 0 ....... ::> :> 0..''- 'r- r- r- c:
:E: a.. 0.. 0.. C. C. ro n::I ro
f- 0 <t1 0. 0.::>::> <-
V1 Ll> enco co f- <t1 <t1 "
:::> "'.-._ f-f-QJQJ>,
'J . .,.... = .+-J µ :r:
C),..... 0.0:: 0:: co = ro nj
e:( U 0.0 0 X co <D W t.!] QJ
ITj X >< L
>-- ~ - - '-C - - - - 'r-
=~:3:~ëor-lëo~~ë.oLa...
.;.J
..... .
t- ....
:::>M
. . . . . . . .
OOC7'O.....NM"d"Ln
M(V)<!I"<!I"<!I"<!I"<!I"<!I"
-
u
Z
VI'
c¿
w
>
~.,.
9 -~
w..~
1
I-5
lJ¡
-oJ ~
U
Z ~
~~
Z5
O~
SD
> 2;
-- ""
0:5
Z9-
~8
--
o:t
LL.
o
M
I-
LJ.
LJ.
::r:
U)
.
I.LJ
:> 0
e( -
'0
Z >< ""
01-"....
I-U) 0'\
--I ~ .. '"
e(O::Z N
::r:0::0 I
o..C'(1- _
U)::r: '-" ""
e( Z N
,,- I
00-' "
0:: 0 0:: ....
U)_e( 00
M
. -
o .-
ULOXc..o
OOI-"M
ON "
C:CN -- M
o ::J:: N
0::><1- I
00:: 1.0
zooo M
- 3: M
I- I
V') O. ,.....
~c.:G: œ;
Z
o
-
o
.-
,,>< ""
~ g I- " ~,
>< r-I .. L.O
UJ :z: 0
f-><f- I
o 0:: lD
leno M
3: M
U· I
c:( 0" ,....."
~~t: ~
l-
e(
-'
:::>
en
e(
I-
o
?~
0<.!1
-
Z
\.I)
~
"-
1.0
"-
~
00
w<
::;::0::
_0
I-
~I~
o:t '-"
J,I~
>
..e(
UJ 0..
I-
e(UJ
0>
-f-
OO::Z
_OUJ
~~I~
-'::;::
-' 0.. 0::
_e(o..
::J::X:I:
U~
o
Z
e(Z
-' 0
:::r:_
Uf-
- 0..
0:: _
0::
:::r:U
I- U)
0:: LJ.
00
Z
~~I
>- I
I-M
-
U
··0
0:: Z
UJ
ZOO
3: 0
0.-,
U) >-
o 00
-
en
I.LJ
l-
e(
o
l-
V)
o
U
OOOOOOOOOLO
00000000000
· . .. . . . . .. . .
OOOOOU">LOOOo:t
ooaCC,......,t..nNOOl.O
OU")COCOONNI..DOCO
,. ft ,... '" .. .. .. ..
- 0'\
I..ON~L(')(Y)OU")
_M
-
-
I.LJ
I-U
-....
Z 0::
:::> 0..
000000000
000000000
· . . . . .. . -a
O_OOLOLOLOO
o OM.....-t~,.......OO
o <Q"lIII:Tr-I...-tC'\J('t'")r-4
....
l-
V)
o
"-'
000000000000
NO<.Do:tONOOOo:t
· . . . . . . . . ..
NOMOOONLOOOO
O"IO"I.....,....,CO.q-I.OY')OO
<1'~I.O~~~~c.;.~~
"
-
U">NMo:tMOcYJ
_M
-
-
LJ.
I-U
--
Z 0::
:::> 0..
ONOO<Do:tOOO
NOOOO'<l'LOo:tOOO
· . . . .. . . -0
N_<.DNU">OOU">U">
0'\ LO-.:tr-lO'\Ç"L.C:IO
q- N(V")r-I NNr-I
l-
V)
8
0000000000
OOOOOOOOOU">
· . .. . . . . . . .
000000000"
OOOOONU">OO"
NMT'-.vNNCOI.QOI..O
.. ,. .. .. .. .. ..
_M
-
\D"NNMOO
- <:T
....
-
UJ
I- U
--
Z 0::
:::> 0..
000000000
0o:t0000000
· . . . . . . . 0
0....000000
o U">OO<.DLOOO
N Mqoc:T _H"f')r-I
-
>-
I-
z-
e(1-
-' Z
o..e(
:::>
t"""40N\DOO"O"IN...-f
o r-I r-I M r-t .......
LO
0'\
I-
-
z
:::>
::z: :r:::I::r: .:r:::r: .
U .UUU>UUV1
e(OOe(<I;e( .e(e( .
L.I.J-JI.J.JL.LJw.JULUL.L.J-!
z
o
~
I-
0.
-
0::
U
U)
UJ
o
QJ
"
<1J
<-
<.!1 QJ
QJU
,,"c
OJ ft:I f'C
.c<-3:
VI '-" 0
~
'-"CI) C-eJ......
~ ~ or- CU c::(
QJCJ u...c
'+-'+- VI'µ
C ~ ~ o·~ C
OIllCC 'µCQJ
0'1 rt:I ~ .,... E
~C:L-c;... VlU-.p.)
I'C .,... ....- t-- c:: QJ Vl
U+J 0 XO:::J
o +J <1J Q).,... 0 +J 't"""')
r-''''' U U +.J ca "C
QJ LJ.. .,....,... I'tI :I: c:( V"J
0:: > > U +oJ ,,- I--
-t-~Or-:::J .z
. ð) ClJr-r- 0 Cr-W
> ...... U') V') Q)'r- c: 'r- 'r- Z
O::::4-r(:1nj+.J1-
t!:IU~t.. ..::at::QJt...:::>V1
1lJCU)(u,...-c :::J
"'C\...~+.JOrcU oðr--:>
cQl'UraOOro E 0
ro.....-:s: ~ oði ~ c:n~
ol::IQJ ac;
'µCQJQJ +-'>4-1'"",>-
c: o~_ \... a.\r-U')n~
rei s.... CJ"I.Q aJ ~ > ;.: _
~"""'C::::5~U oð5--1
-0 .,.... 0 QJ c: ~ r- _
>,CJU)V)::S:o.µV)o..f-
:r:_ U3'v;:::J
.,... +J ~ ~
~ t ~ ð 2 ~ .,.;.,.; ~ <i
'r- :::J ..c ~ rtS .."'t:I ""0 .,..... ~
u.,OV')V)3Nc:Cc:::(:E:a
t-
I
. . . . . . . . . aJ
W""cx)O'IO~N("I")-d":J
q-q-oc;;T'IQ"'LJ")L.OL.nI..(")LOV1
~
I-
~
....
-
....
o
o
o
lO
co
M
~
00
U"> 0
· .
coo
_0
<3'.. ~
NM
....
o
LO
.;
00
LO 0
· .
\D 0
o
0'\
M
o
N
0'1
M
....
MO
MO
WÒ
\D U">
L('¡M
· .
o:t LO
\D
-
-
o:t
N
·
U">
......0
....0
00
.... U">
M
U">
o
o
·
co
o:t
N
"
....
00
LOO
~o
lO 0
NO
.
o:t_
-
-
o
""
LÒ
00
U"> 0
'0
0'\ .
....
....
o
00
o
M
0'\ ....
o:t
o:t
·
L1..
~
LL. V)
-' -'
III
.....~
010
U'r-
<-
,:,¿<1J
U'µ
'r- 10
<-::s:
en ,
~
M
<1J
oðU
C
<1J <1J
uu..
c:
XCJECJ':'¿
WurdLJ...C
c: .c:. 'r- .c
· C) It].-...-J U
~u- ~.,... \...
I/) (.!;Itet::::sVl
c: r- 0::: 'r- .µ ~
o 'r- >, (Ij VI L..LJ
UtOr-C.s:::. I--
aJO:::.- <UU~........
0::: .,... "0 0
.-- co 0 ..c --I (/)
'!- t'CJ 0 en :;j
o.µ .:;¡:.,.... .0
rut.. :r:t..lLI
V')<lJ:E::=:: ~z
::;::.µ .µ- <I;
W m . >, VI L.O >t-'
I-- U U .CJ c: .CJ --J
¡-...OClJ 03: w
r- 0."0 U Q) "'0 U
V) <1JV)QJ<1JZ<1JV)
::JeY-: .c:::o::: ..c........
o . V1 . VI ~
LJ..J oð .µ .,... oð .µ 'r-
______ VIe: VI¡=:...-J
a::C>~t...>ct...c:('
::U~8¿:æ8¿:b
UJ I-
U I
U1 .. ca
I--1LnI..O """'00 ::J
:;:EL.{")l.(') l(")U1 (/)
CJ
U
C
<]Jill
LL. ~
<1J
CJ'r-
<- <-
'r- OJ
3:..,
'"
.::;::
.."
III ~
00
U"> 0
00'\
MO
0'\ lO
_N
N
-
o
LO
·
LO
" 0
<.D N
MO'>
.0 ~
o:t L('¡
- "
N
-
......
....
·
o:t
00 00
OLO 0'\
.. .
lD 0'\ N
0.... LO
_.0 "
·
No:t N
M "
o:t
·
-
.... ....
o
o
<D
....
LO
M
·
LL.
~
N
"
.
<.D
U">
o:t
co
o:t
lD
-
<7>
o
M
o
CO
oct'
·
N
N
LO
-
....
~
o
-
00
UJ
U)
e(
en
I-
Z
:::J
CJ
~
f-
U
e(
0::
f-
Z
o
U
-'
e(
f-
o
f-
00000
00'\000
co_ooo
NOoo::rl.D
M 0'\ 0'\ 00
· .
U"> N
-
-
0,......,00
O-OOLO
· . . .
.oo:tOM
00 \D N o:t
<.D o:t M \D
· . . .
-\DOO
NlQ,.....,q-
c.t' oc:r ~ LO
· .
0'\ lD
-
~g)G:;~
ONON
-
0000
O'<l'o:tlD
· . . .
N"OOLO
00 0'\ u; o:t
COo:tOLO
\D <.D _
....
LOOOO
""""r--4mN
· . . .
"""NON
OOo:tlDOO
000'\ " o:t
OOO_N
M....
<.!1
Z
....
Z
UJ
o
-
3:
· . . .
>-LL.LL.LL.
· . . .
u-,V)-,
,:,¿
3:
.µ
~
u..
U
C
o
U
<-
CJ
.c
.µ
o
L.oð
C<1J
o .., VI
'r- .., >,
-t-I::Ir-'µ
rdt!J:>,.-
> <1J
.,,"0 ...c
UCV1O-
><<1J>'1II
UJ ~e(
.C><-
..µ ~Q t..
QJ:::J 0
QJU
<- III CJ
.¡..J cn~ .µ
V') c: r- <1J
'r- 3: t...
".µ"U
WV')V>c:
.,-.,.... 0
'+-x.µu
",...w V')
V') 'r-"µ
1/)0)(:;:)
rtj>LLJU
~O
UE>3:
:5~~~
UJ
Z
e(
-'
>-
c(
o
--
-'
o
:r:
UJ
l-
e(
z
c:r:
LJ.
f-
-'
e(
I.LJ
:>
-
I-
-
o
o
e(
<<-rd.d.
~LO\D""'"
----
u
z
-
'--
VI
c¿
LW
3:
o x;
W:¿
I
I-=
III .c
:.:
°2
z ,_
W¡1f2
z,z
Og
~
¿"
.--;::
O~
Z
~8
0:1'
LI-
°
0:1'
I-
UJ
UJ
:I:
V!
.
UJ
:> °
e( ..-<
'0
Z X 1.0
Ol-r---..-<
I- V! 0>
-l ~ 0>
<co::z N
:I: 0:: ° I
0-e(1- ..-<
V!:I: t!:> lO
<C Z N
r--~ I
OO-l r--
0::00:: ..-<
V! ..-< <C co
M
. ..-<
o '''-<
ULOXlO
co I- r--- M
ON r---
c:(N .. M
° :J: N
O::XI- I
° 0:: lO
ZCOO M
- 3: M
1-' t
(/) 0:. ,......
~~t: a;
z:
°
..-<
°
...-<
KXIC
V!01-r--..-<
e(CO N
>< I"'"'"i ... L.(')
UJ :J: °
I-xl- t
o 0:: lO
,CQO M
3: M
U. t
<CO r---
~o.:t;: éÕ
l-
e(
-l
::>
CQ
e(
I-
o
?UJ
Ot!:>
..-< e(
Z
W~
::::0::
_0
I-
~I~
'<:t t!:>
,Z
lO _
>
..e(
W 0-
l-
e( UJ
0> V!
-I-
OO::Z
-OW
CO ::::
Z W
j~ð
-l 0- 0<
.......q:a...
:J::I:::::
U_
o
z
e(Z
-l °
:J: _
~16:
0:: ~
0::
:J: U
I-V>
0< W
00
z:
CO
\í\
~
~
~
~
ê~
td~
:I:
U
~~I
>- ,
I-M
-
U..
..0
0< Z
UJ
Z CO
30
° 'J
V!
o
-
CO
w
I-
<C
o
>-
CO
l-
V!
°
U
OOLnOONOOOaOI.,()
o>Oo:l'Oooo:l'O'<:tOCOOLO
~~~cÖ"":~~~òóå~
Nr"""'40L..(')o:::t'L.C)N,...."..-tCOON
O:~~~~~~~(V)~~~
LO'd"'.....-INI..D,.......COOJ
NN _
MNN
N
..-<
-
w
I-u
--
Z 0::
::> 0-
OOLOOo:l'",,"OOOOO
"'"'o-.:;:tL.(').......,-.....0..-1 r-IMO
.-:c:ÔåÖM~~~MMÓ
r--- M °
M
l-
V!
C>
U
O"-<M",,"O"-<OOOlOOLO
LOlOO'<tCOooOCQoo>oo
~~Ñ~LlÍ~';cÔå~ó';
Nq-Ilõt'MI.t')('\JU')Lf)OI..OI.OLO
C'\rnML.(')COCONU1U"')M~1"""'1
.. ...... ............ .......
O-=::t~ """'L.C)r---......-t 'd".....-t'd'"
.....-t NN M (Y)
..-<
-
UJ
I-U
--
z: 0::
::> 0-
Or--Mo>",,"r---OOO..-<O
LO""",,,,"OO>LOONOr---O
· . . . . . . . . . .
MCOOOMM..-<OLOMLO
,...." M r-t "d'"
N
l-
V!
8
OOMNOLOOOOOOO
"""00_0,,,,"00>01.000>
~lÒN~-:óóòår-:å~
I.OM'd"'r-tOOQ)<:TI.ONOl{")
MI.OM'd"''d''''d'''.....-tr--...\0U1Nq-
... .... ........ ......
"d"'c::t.....-t OWCCN e;:Tr-t0'\
MN N r-t
r-I
-
w
I-U
--
z: 0::
::> 0-
OOMr---OLOOLOOLOO
o:I'Oo:l'OMlOOMLOooO
....:~óO.;~~,....:M~å
r--- M LO
..-<
~
z: -
d::1-
-lz:
O-e(
::>
"-<Mr-I\COMo:I'",,"OlOoo
NIr.ON.............MMO"'IO.......
...... .-t~ONNO,....r-t
~
M
CT) L/') ,......, .......
M
..-<
I-
-
Z
::J
· .... ... :r:
>-Z:>->->->-ZLl-Ll-Ll-U
'0 . . . .0 . . .e::(
V! I-V!V! V! V! 1--lV! V!UJ
z:
°
-
I-
0-
0::
U
V!
W
o
::::
W
I-
-
QJ
-0
'"
<-
>- . (..!:I
· VI
V') QJ ,....,µ-o,
--...... l./),.....aJt./")O)
~ :::)CJQ)..c,
o Q).¡-i . If f
¢ . .µ V) I+--'~ I
UV> c:c:,
tn . 'r- or- I
.::,¿ -C ',- . 4- (lJ u.. I
U C:+-J .::.l~4-~O::: I
ro It)'::'¿ U c: 'r- 0 I
..c V) 0 U·"" oð'r- (l) ..µ r
I- ........ u ''- .J:; C.J 0::. ,.... I
]: .<:I-V1<>:: UVI,
- QJ ~..- c: 'C(1) I
CO"'Oµ U 0 'r-~ >< ,
- I'C ro ro = N'r- r- U a t
t..O~N +->UC Ace t
(1) O'IU "C .,... c:: ~ C1J
"0.0 'µ""CQJV"t~ ""Q.¡..JLJ.J
."t ::s QJ _ Q.J.µ c: A''- :::3 I--
~V'E"'.p.Jura ft.3:oc:(
C"I ''-' -c LI ra \... .... V) c: Z
..Q "'0 ~ a. /'0 0..1-- QJ ~- cO 0:::
~ ~o...~ C-'l.Ö~::3 tl.O~~
.,.... C,/'} ð u 0 ~ Q ftU....J
""O....-:;:(,/')(...) It-~ V1 c::(
(]J 'r- :> 0::: . >,oð
N..o:r:>UUU= u.....- I..LJ
.,.... ra I ::x:: <C « c:( c::t c: > > >
_+Jc:(IZ:E::'::NO __......
o"'V")UJ<C:J.:::r::r: UU>I-
..c l.LJ oð c: ~
"'~iE... .. _.. ~OL.ð
....oo<-cnoo.C>UU....o
V") 4-0 0 = = = ~ or- 3= or;:x;
° ::>.<:.><
OJ CUMN QJ QJ aJU1-1-- .-J
EEl I a. c.. 0. 'r-')c::(
.,... 'r- U U ~ >t >t= = = "0 t--
-l-l::;:O::I-I-I-ICLO<.D<C°
t-
. . . . . . . . . I
. <C <C <C e( <C <C cr: <C e( en
C(C:X::O~NM~Uìl.O""""'N::)
Q)C)~.........-4~I""""'I"""~r"""1l.i)U)
-
-
-
r---
N
M
co
o
.-<
r---
r---
~
..-<
-
LO
M
'<:t
M
lO
\C
LO
CD
~
..-<
-
co
co
r---
o
N
.
N
0>
LO
r-I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
UJ
l-
e(
Z
0::
UJ
I-
-l
<C
w
>
-
I-
-
o
o
cr:
V!
::J
-l
C-
o
-
CO
W
V!
e(
CO
I-
z:
::J
°
à:
I-
U
<C
0::
I-
z
°
U
-l
e(
I-
°
t-
o
Z
e(
0::
t!:>
°
M
M
<t'!
LO
LO
N
0:1'
~
°
°
0:1'
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
t
I
I
I
t
t
t
I
t
t
t
I
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
V!
>-
e(
o
0::
cr:
o
~
-l
<C
u
o
:z:
°
CQ
o
-
CO
,
-." . KNOWlTÓN:'ENGLlSH-FlOWERS, INC. ~;&;:;:
< ~'IC .......,... __~0rII.I
.. .. - .. . ..
. ...... ..
OWNER: City of North Rich1and
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE@¿f
JOB NO. 3-334
=-
~PROJECT DESCRJPTIOH~ Chapman Drive Paving and Drainage Imorovements
~nc1assified Street Excavation
t"nl"ltrolled Densitv Embankment
, J:xi <;1: Rnx Cu1 vert at Sta. 41+00
L-~emove Exist. Box Culvert at Sta. 67+50
Remove Existina Curb and Gutter
1mv Exist. Sdw1ks. Drwvs. V1vs & Other Conc F1twk
)aw Cut Concrete or Asoha1t
<:., .J ~~ni Î7ed wI! ;me Slurry (8" Thick)
l.ime for Stabi 1 i zed Subarade
1C-30 or EA-HVMS Prime Coat w/Sand
~C-2 or' EA-HVRS ASDhalt Tack Coat
TVDe "A" (or "B") HMAC Comoacted 2" Thick
rvne "n" ~MA(, I' .J ?" Thick
-\Ina "n" I-INlAr ';1"1" T,.;:Inc:i'tinnc "Mic,. lI"ec:
~ il t"1I,.h " ?4" - Tn,.l Rp in¡: ,tpp 1
-:;11 Thi,.¡" rnn,. - Tn,.l Reinf' ,'taal
:;" Thi,.¡" t"n-n,. f'n,. Vl \I - '-' r;;-,.1 Rein1 ,tl
4" Thirk r <;i~1 kc: Tnt"'l_ Reinf .~_
1~" ni;:¡ 'rl T'T DrD Tn,.l :'Y";:I\I/:,~i'\ti7Rk'
)ßII ni;:l '('I \( !t"P Tn,.1 ~Y";¡\I¡~;"~ IRkf'
y~" ni~ 1"1 Tin Rr.P Tnr-l J:xr-i'lvIFmnn'Rkf
4R" Dia. CL III RCP. Incl. Excav/Embd/Bkf
IQII Di a. CL IV) RCP. Incl. Excav7Embd/Bkf
'~ Standard Cast-In-P1ace Curb Inlet
1 n' Standard Cast- In-P1 ace Curb In1 et
15' Standard Cast-In-Place Curb Inlet
~'-2"- Cast-In-Place Stann Drain Vault @ Sta.
T1+53, IncT. Relnf. Steel
15'--10" Cast-In-P ace Stann Draln Vau I t @ Sta.
. m+,43 Inc . Re1 nt. Steel
"-:j~-lU' ~ast-In-Placestorm uraln -Vault \9 ~ta.
46+98 Inc. Relnf. Steel
! i'-10" Cast-In-P1ace Storm Drain Vau t @ Sta.
'-0,)4+95 Inc. Relnf. Steel
, -ST,:,,10" Cast-In-P- ace Storm Draln Vault \9 Sta.
;7+66.2 Incl. Re1nf. Steel
L', -10" Cast-In-Place Stonn uraln vault \9 Sta.
73+58 Incl. Kelnt. steel
Tvne TT-AA (or BB) Reflective Traffic ~1arkers
tefl. Pvmt. Strioina (Double Yellow Cant. liner
~oDsoi1 in Place
Seed; n9 wI Common Bennuda Grass {--C-ynodon Dactylon}
. ( Applled at 2 Lbs./lOOO S.F. 36. S.Y. I,ll::> U.4U
'-o:iUB-TOIAL LlMUUNI I:SIU -------------------------____ ______10_________________ ______ ;)
-
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
ITEM
NO.
l.
2.
:f
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
11.
14
, 11:\
lli
17
18
1<1
?n
?1
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
¿ö.
79.
30.
-n-.
J¿.
33.
34.
35.
'--
REWED & APPROVED:
UNIT
C.Y.
C Y
LS
L.S.
L. F.
S. F.
L. F.
S.Y.
TON
S.Y.
S.Y.
S.Y.
~ Y
Tn-N
I 1=
-~- 1=
, F
S F
I F
I 1=
I F
L.F.
L. F.
EACH
EACH
EACH
L.S.
T.~.
L.S.
L.S.
c.s.
L.~.
EACH
L. F.
C.Y.
TOTAL
OUANTITY
14-933
1-144
1
1
2.805
15.422
1.524
39 .883
798
39.823
96,242
103,057
':t? n~'
~(f,:!
11:\ 1:\1A
R. q7q
5.839
8.839
F\71
?4~
1.:llq
1.429
582
1
21
4
1
1
l.
1.475
7.372
189
DATE:
UNIT
PRICE
4.00
4 on
.¡:;nnnnn
5000.00
1.70
0.50
2.00
1.60
77.50
0.22
0.07
2. >0
3- 0
~ ,n
~ F\n
~_ 1"
3.:ln
3.00
?4,nn
10 nn
"n-_n-o
55.00
60.00
1200.00
1500.00
2000.00
1
2500.00
1
.:::::>uu.uu
1
ÖUU.UU
2500.00
¿::>UU.OU
Z500.UU
4.00
0.25
12.00
-
SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
PLUS
- ---
-:~w. ~
_tOJECT MAH4GER
'--
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
.
J--'
5-13-85
Paqe 1 of 3
COST
$ 59 732 00
4"7F\ on
",OnO 00
5.000.00
4.768.'50
7 . 711. 00
3.048.00
63 812.80
61.845.00
8.761.06
6,736.94
267,948.20
102-1i59 2n
A Q; M
1O?1 Rn
)~ IQ' QC::
9 268.70
26.517.00
1 F\ -, nil nn
7?Qn nn
6" 950 00
78.595.00
34.920.00
1,200.00
31.500.00
8,000.00
.
2,500.00-
¿,:>UU.UU
Z,5OU.Du-
2,500.00
2,5OU.UU
¿,::>UU.UU
5.900.00
1.843.00
2,268.00'
böb.UU
,u::>::>,EZl .-u5
.
.., ·"~~WlTóN-ENCLlSH-FlOWERS.INC. 6iii:i:
. ~111C ~/'" .....CIrIIr. ...~...
~' ," '..... - . "
OWNER~ r.it~ of North Rich1and
ENG I NEER I S EST! MA TË0ii:;
J-'
JOB NO. 3-334
DA TE:
5-13-85
__ PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Chapman Drive Paving and Drainage ImDrovements
Paqe 2 of 3
r_ DESCR I PTI ON OF ITEM ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT COST
NO. OUANTlTY PRICE
n-ITT I HY AD,] TMENTS:
h" r1 "n-n T W;¡tpr pinp w/Pn1vethv1ene
i Tnd Fxr:i'lV Embd. &- Bac ~fi 11 37. L F. 145 . 17.00 1$ 2.465.00
II nR 1Ã pvr ';- Pi De Incl. Excav Embd/Bkf 38. L.F" 190 17.00 3 230.00
I R" nR 1 R pvr.W;ttpr Pi De Tnc1. Excav Embd/Bkf 39. L.F. 3 .091 18.00 55.638.00
r461xR" Tannina Saddle with 8" TaDDinq Valve & Box 40. EACH 1 400.00 1,400.00
\"y~" T; ,lppvp with RI' T;¡nnina \/;¡lVP J!. Box 4 . EACH 2 700.00 1.400.00
D:;lIv':::lI T:o <::100\10 I.,;+n ':::" T:onn;nn v;:¡1\10 1 Rnv -ii II='A('I-I 4 hnn,nn ? M In nn
1t:¡1I ,f:;:¡+o "~l\l~ ;:¡nri Rnv 4~ II='Ar.H 4 £:innnn 2 01 1n.00
II C:o+o V;¡l\lO :onri Rny 44 I='ArH 2 550.00 1 1( )n 00
1"1=';"0" . 4£:i EACH 4 1000.00 4 000.00
Il='i..o ., -' Inn ~ V n,,'--_6;nn 46. EACH 1 850.00 850.00
illt-+ilo T,..nn 'M' (' T , I='i . 47 R. 9.500 1.50 14 250.00
'"
1.--. ~;nnlo l ;,;:¡ to'" 'O"V i,. ø T,..;:¡ ~, 4 II='Ar.H ? 170.00 340.0n
r 'hn,.t 'nllhl p W;:¡to.. ,. . T,..;¡ ~ 4' EACH 16 85.00 2.960.00
'.
r'1;:¡to.. .. 1 Rnv Dø1o,.;¡tion ¡; ,. IF Ar.H lR 50 00 2 700.00
'.?7 (' R;:¡,.kfi11 51 C Y 37 30.00 1.110.00
Ïãri; Wt,.. V;¡1vp J!. rlp;¡nnlltRnypc: to Finic;hpd r,rade 52. EACH 19 130.00 2 470.00
r /lri; ~~ 1 n..;:¡;n MH tn I=';ni c:hprl - ~~1 FA (j. 1? ?'in nn 3nnn,on
,;.,,.. Dlllmn';nn :on,. IItilitv Ani AP "4 , 1 , n nnn 1 n ,nnn- nn-
hllR_ TnTAI IITT TTV AII.III'IM..-NTS _____________________ ------ ------ ----------- ------- $111 313.00
r
I T ~CELLANEOUS ITEMS:
',-- & Relocate or Reconstruct Exist. Wire Fence 55. L. F. 3,080 10.00 1$ 30,800.0a
I,", ,~ ,no(" Mpti\l Rail Fence w/Materia1 s
''''u'rnis'hed by Mr. Billy Graham 56. L. F. 449 10.00 4,490.00
mv & 'Reconst. Wooden Rail Fence & 3 Brick Col. ST. loS. 1 ~OOO.OO 4,000.00
rr.nnc;t New £:i-foot Hiah Chain Link Fence w/Materia1 s
l~urnished bv Mr. Loy Sturch 58. lo F. 351 10.00 3,510.00
UB-TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS -----------__________ ------ ------ ----------- -------- ::> 42,1::!00.00
r-' .
IADDITIVE ALTERNATE -- HOLIDAY LANE WIDENING:
nc1assified Street Excavation lA. C.Y. 888 6.00 $ 5,328.00
~emove Existing Curb and Gutter ~A. ..../-. j,U!:I4 1./0 ~,'!)9.1::!0
-I Rmv. Exi st. Sdwl ks. Drwvs.. V1 vs & Other Cone F1 tk 6A. S.F. 1.176 0.50 588.00
aw Cut Concrete or Asphalt 7A. L.F. 248 2.00 496.00
ime Stabil i zed Subarade (8" Thick, 40#/ S. Y .) . 8A. S.Y. 3,121 2.00 6,242.00
II imp fo,. <\ti'lhi1i7Pd Subnrade 9A. TON 63 80.00 5.040.00
/ur...30 or I='A_HVM, Prime Coat w/<\and lOA. S.Y. 3.121 0.25 780.25
C...2 or EA-HVRS ASDha1t Tack Coat lIA. S.Y. 5.916 0.15 887.40
rr'vDe liB" HHAC ComDacted 2" Thick 12A. S.Y. 7,070 3.20 22,624.00 .
fType liD" HMAC, Compacted 2" ThlCk 13A. s. Y. 7,233 3.60 ~b,u.:SI::!.8¡r
!\lno IIn" HMAr fn... r"i'lnc;itionc; "Mic;r: Ike~ t4A. irON 234 30 00 7.020.00
1-10\'11 rll,.1-\ " ?4" r,lIttp,. 1nc1 Rpi nf Steel 5A. LF 3.094 6.60 20.420.40
r ~II Thi("\( rnn,. n,.wvc: Tn,.1 <\tppl hA S. F 10n ~ 1 £:i 31£:i on
....
If 'EWED & APPROVED: SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST - ---
-~. PLUS .
~
_ROJECT MANAGER ~. - TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
., .
; .,., KNOWlT6N-ENClISH-,FlOWERS, INC. {;;@;;
ÇÞ#IU'IC ~,'-'.......~ .
. . - . . .
-'. -. . .~ .
/~~~~::':
ENG I NEER I S EST I MA TE ':;;;;;;:'
J-'
OWNER: Citv of North Richland
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ha man Drive Pavin
JOB NO. 3-334
DA TE:
5-13-85
I~ I ITEM I I TOTAL UNIT
DESCR I PTI ON OF ITEM NO. UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST
6" Thick Cone. Valleys. 61 Wide. Incl. Reinf. Stl. 17 A. S.F. 1.176 3.30 $ 3.880.80
I Ad,i. Wtr Valve & Cleanout Boxes to Finished Grade 52A. EACH 8 130.00 1.040.00 '
' SUB-TOTAL ADDITIVE ALTERNATE _____________________ ------ ------ ~---------- -------- $105.960.45 I
,
¡-
I SUMMARY
~UB-TOTAL STREET & DRAINAGE ______________________. ------ ------ ----------- ------ $ ,'U4,~~/.~u
I )UB-TOTAL WATER & SEWER ----_______________________ ------ ------ ----------. ------ .$ 11l,313.UU
-
'--
,
I..-.. ~
.
'"-
.
r
:--;
I
L
-
'"-
,
-
'"-
-
-
-
~f"'tWED & APPROVED: SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST - __ ~ .315 qnn¡:;n
~:~~ {j), . PLUS;NGINEERING & CONTINGENCIES 64-,099.50
~
,
i )JECT MANAGER TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ ,380,000.00
-
Page 3 of 3
l
i
L
If
[
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
"<
Department:
Subject: Payment for MafJ,ter Drainage Plan Mapping
~
1-
~
-;
']
'lì
~-
[
'ÖólIncil Meeting Date: 6-24-85
Agenda Number: PAY 85-20
The master drainag~ plan study authorized 30 sets of all <locuments from
Knowlton, English, & FI~rs'.The plan inlcudes 39 individual drainage
maps and the overall: drainage master plan map which'wi~lbè ulJeful for
many years to come .tothe ,City, . developers , engineers, ,·etc.. Accordingly,
200 additional sets,oftbesemaps have been ordered:fromKnoWlton, English,
& Flowers ata cost.of.$12,OOO. A fee schedule for sale of these maps
to the public will». recommended within a short time.
Recommendation: Tt:1è~staff ,'rec01llQendation is to' appr()'Ve t~payment to
Knowlton, English, &J1Lqwersinthe amount of $12,OOO.formaster drainage'
plan mapping.
Funding source: It is the staff recommendation that funds be appropriated
as follows:
From Amount
Budget Reserve
Contingency
To
Plats & Maps
$12,000
$ 12,OOO
\.
. Finance Review
Acct. Number See
Sufficient·' ods Available
above
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget X
Other _, _
Depart~n~~Uril . :
.. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. FinanCII OiÆctor
~,_ . _ _ _ ' . t'
~
City Manager
Pace 1 of
1
·
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
June 14, 1985
Project: 3-224 - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
STATEMENT
For the Month of
MAY, 1985
3-224 - DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN
""-"-
Phase 500 - General Consultation & Special Studies:
Printing & Reproduction (Additional report copies
over Contract Amount)
$12,000.00
$12,000.00
TOTAL BALANCE DUE
$12,000.00
NOTE: Authorized by Gene Riddle 6/13/85.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.' BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
Çr
q ,:::::e::rgan P::::~O:~,p±einage
Pay Estimatet/l
r
~
~
~.
~
~
~
\
J
¡
f
1
Tn
t~
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
6-24-85
Improvements Partiàl'.'
Agenda Number: PAY 85-21
The contractor on this
started his channel
along the channel on s
because the utility poles,
electric company. "
completed the utility adjustments and
so removed and reloçated the fences
,",However, . at this U.. ~. have a hangup
'otbeen moved by the phònecompany and ,the
It was discovered seve:ral;:Wëeks ago' that another five foot of. utility
easement was needediri'or D1Øve these poles. .t\t:th:ls U.me most of
these easements have been, , hÒlíJever, we are havin8' a problem getting
one of the easements that tSnèeded. '
This job is approximately; 15% co1àp1.eted at this time.
Recommendation:
$101ts80.09.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
. , ," , -.
,', " ,'_ -, J
The staffrec~1Dmendation is to pay·LCU·Construction Company
Finance Review
Acet. Number l3-00-s1-6Is0
~gn~um, ~ff,~~
CITY: CtJUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
1
Page 1 of
I
r
.'
KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS,INC:
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
June 10, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re:
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.1, dated
June 10, 1985, made payable toL C H Construction Co., in the amount of
$101,580.09, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of May 31, 1985.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $101,580.09, be made to L C H
Construction Co., P.O. Box 227, Decatur, TX, 76234.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you
may have concerning this project.
~a-J-?1I. ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P:E.
RWA/lld
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 4. iJ1tlSCOPY FOR
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of ~blic Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
L C H Construction Co.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
L
.
L
t
L
..
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Utility
S· Watauga Trunk, !kin. e,,', p., ha.se 1, Pay Estimate 112
'. . ubJect: ,
6-24-85
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PAY 85-22
This is the 30 inch outfalls.ewer line that we are, installing from south of
interstate 820 to the,Watau$'ìci.ity limits line. This prqject is about 70%
complete at this time. Tl).e. contractor is proceeding without any hangups
on this project.
Recommendation: The~taff recplnmendation is to approvè the payment in the
amount of $246,089.79. to Secure Resources Inc.
r !
~
~
J
~
!
f
L
r
i
L
L
Source of Funds:
L·· Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
L _olher ~ßI'He~~~
.,' .': ',. ,-', .,'" ,
[ . CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Rev
. Finance Director
-
Paae 1 of 1
- -/
K NOWL TON-E NG LI S H-F LOWE RS, 1 NC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
June 10, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-420, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BTGFOSSIL CREEK SANITARY SEWER'
IMPROVEMENTS: WATAUGA TRUNK LINE - PH. 1
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.2
,
Enclosed is one coPy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2, dated
June 10, 1985, made payable to Secure Resources Inc., in the amount of
$246,089.79, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of May 29, 1985.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your
representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and
we have checked the item extensions and additions.
-
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $246,089.79, be made to Secure
Resources Inc. at 807 Texas American Bank Tower, Dallas, TX, 75235.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank
estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
be present at the next Council meeting to answer any questions you may
cerning this project.
~IJ~
C A In 0 N, P. E .
DHC/lld
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager /
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works ~
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Secure Resources, Inc.
, en' ,I='NTR A.L OR.. SUITE 550 . REDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
Department:
Subject: Harwood Road IJilproYeIÌet'lts
f
~
~
¡
~
¡
T
~.
~.
~
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works
,Council Meeting Date: 6-24-85
Agenda Number: PAY 85-23
Pay Estimate 112
This project is approximat~ly l00~ complete at this time. However, the
contractor has been waiting for thê developer at the corner of Harwood
and Grapevine Highway to com.pletehis channel work sa that they may move
the signalization and'guardr.iJ.,.'ot'lthe northeast eornerof Grapevine Highway
and Harwood Road. This áhoUld,', bè aeco$plished within. ,the next month.
Recommendation: The staffreeommendation is to approvèthe payment to
Austin Road Company in 'the amount of $113,7s4.27.
Funding Source:
13-00-02-6150 ". , $ll;t, 694.67
09-00';"70-6700:. $,2.059.60
GO& Rev
Finance Review
Acet. Number.
Sufflclen unds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other ~. ~º'.
Department Head IgnatUf'e, If
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
See Above
. Finance Director
,.
City Manager
PaQe 1 of
I
I
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
June 10, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-229, CITY OF ,NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON
HARWOOD ROAD FROM BOB DR. TO HIGHWAY 26
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2, dated-
June 10, 1985, made payable to Austin Road Co., in the amount of
$113,754.27, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of May 31, 1985.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Floyd A. McCallum, as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $113,754.27, be made to
Austin Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, TX, 76113.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you
may h e concerning this project.
.~
RWA/ll d
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works+ [HIS COPY FOR
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Austin Road Co.
i D -;:
5
cJ~
tç 9 c/o b 1
(I fJ Q fø é)
~ f·
d-f 0
-
...
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283·6211 . METRO/267-3367
l.' .'. NQRTH ß'J~L~~D HILLS
J Department: Public Works
) Subject: Glenview Drive ImtJ'rovemeµ.ts Pay Estimate. 112
I
~
~
o
1
.~
t
~
I
~
~
1
~
r Source of Funds:
L Bonds (GO/Rev.)
J" ' Operating Budget
.~Other ~~i~
~ Department Head Signature
L C/TY.eQ.{JNe/t. ACTION ITEM
6-24-85
Agenda Number: PAY 85-24
The south half of this stree'tis completed except fQr the final asphalt course.
The contractor is now work1ugon\the north half of th1sstreet and he should
have asphalt on the north half by the time the next. pay estimate comes due.
"" -:-,,',-",
This job is over 50% complete~t t~1.s time.
J :'.:I::"_,
Recommendation: The staf,frecommendation is to approve the payment to
Austin Road Company in.the-amount of $sl,63s .27.
GO
Finance Review
Acet. Number ~"00-04-6Is0
Sufflcle !, Funds Availabte
-
-
. Finance Dlrec'or
Paae 1 of
1
I
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
June 12, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-230, CITY OF NORTH RICHLA~DHILLS
STREET AND DRAINAßE IMPROVEMENTS ON
GLENVIEW DR. FROM HONEY LANE TO RUFE SNOW DR.
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.2
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2, dated-
June 10, 1985, made payable to Austin Road Co., in the amount of
$51,635.27, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of May 31, 1985.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Floyd A. McCallum, as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
Werecorrmend that this payment, in amount of $51,635.27, be made to Austin
Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, TX, 76113. -
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
Meeting to answer any questions you
RWA/lld
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager """- iIJ::US~Eœ
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works~ --
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Austin Road Co.
f V/,··
L ,/
A ~ ~///
~ Y/,//'
/
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367