The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1985-07-08 Agendas L L L L L L L L L L L L L· L L L L L I ..L- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 8, 1985 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. PW 8S-l8-Chapman Drive Improvements Bid Tabulation (Postponed at the June 24, 1985 Meeting) - Capital Improvement Committee Recommendation-Mayor Pro Tem Richard Davis and Councilman Jim Ramsey (Agenda Item #28) 2. GN 8S-6l-Possible Reconsideration of the Request of Rick Tuggle for a Driveway Opening onto RufeSnow Drive (Denied at the June 24, 1985 Meeting) (Agenda Item 1123) 3. GN 85-67-Resolution85-16 Interchange Improvements and One-Way Traffic on Service Road at Loop 820 and Grapevine Highway (Agenda Item #26) 4. GN 8S-66-BankDepository Request for Proposal (Agenda Item #25) 5. PU 85-22-Lease/Purchase of Fire Vehicles (Agenda Item #27) 6. Other Items - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 8, 1985 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM 1. Call to Order ACTION TAKEN 2. Roll Call - 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting June 24, 1985 5. Removal of Item (8) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item (8) indicated by Asterisk (24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30) 7. PZ 85-36 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Hanson Properties to 'rezone Tracts 3A1 & 3A2, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from AG (Agriculture) to 0-1 (Office District) (Located at the southwest corner of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road) 8. Ordinance No. 1241 Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN -- ..... 9. PZ 85-60 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Roma Corporation to rezone Lot 3, Block 2, Cochran Addition, from C-2 (Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages (Located at 8010 Bedford-Euless Road) 10. Ordinance No. 1243 '-- 11. PZ 85-64 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Road) 12. Ordinance No. 1245 ...... 13. PZ 85-66 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Bill Fenimore to rezone Tracts 2Al, 2A2, 2A2B, 2A2A, 2A3, 2E1, 2E2, & 2E3, M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from R-3 (Single Family) to R-6-T (Townhouses and Garden Homes District) (Located at the southeast corner of Glenview Drive and Dawn Drive) 14. Ordinance No. 1247 Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 15. PZ 85-67 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Clifford A. Pearson to rezone Tract lA, Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399, from AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family) (Located on the south side of Bursey Road and the west side of Douglas Lane) 16. Ordinance No. 1248 17. PZ 85-70 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Roger & Joan Hanson to rezone Lot 4, Block 1, Martin Addition, from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located west of Precinct Line Road and adjacent to Nob Hill Addition) 18. Ordinance No. 1249 19. PZ 85-71 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Roger & Joan Hanson to rezone Tract 3Y and part of Tract 3U2, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located east of Crane Road and adjacent to Nob Hill Subdivision) 20. Ordinance No. 1250 Page 4 ...... NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 21. PZ 85-68 Request for Appeal Hearing - Earl McKinney, Trustee 22. PZ 85-69 Request for Appeal Hearing - Earl McKinney, Trustee 23. GN 85-61 Possible Reconsideration of the Request of Rick Tuggle for a Driveway Opening onto Rufe Snow Drive (Denied at the June 24, 1985 Meeting) *24. GN 85-65 Request for Easement Release 5113 Pearl Street, Resolution No. 85-15 *25. GN 85-66 Bank Depository Request for Proposal *26. GN 85-67 Resolution No. 85-16, Interchange Improvements and One-Way Traffic on Service Road at Loop 820 and Grapevine Highway *27. PU 85-22 Lease/Purchase of Fire Vehicles 28. PW 85-18 Chapman Drive Improvements Bid Tabulation (Postponed at the June 24, 1985 Meeting) *29. PAY 85-25 Palomar Drive Street and Drainage Improvements, Pay Estimate #4 and Final *30. PAY 85-26 Calloway Acres Street & Drainage Improvements, Pay Estimate #8 Page 5 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 31. Citizen Presentation 32. Adjournment "-- "-- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JUNE 24, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. -........... '-- ...... 1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order June 24, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Harold Newman Marie Hinkle Virginia Moody Jim Ramsey Jim Kenna '-- "-- '-- Staff : Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Lee Maness Richard Royston Richard Albin Rex McEntire Marjorie Nash '-- Press: Duward Bean Mark England Absent: Gene Riddle Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Finance Director Director of Planning City Engineer Attorney Planning & Zoning Member Northeast Chronicle Mid Cities Daily News Public Works Director 3. The invocation was given by Councilman Ramsey. - 4. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of June 10, 1985. '-- Motion carried 6-0; Councilman Kenna abstaining due to absence. 5. Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed item #18 from the Consent Agenda. 6. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the Consent Agenda. "-- Motion carried 7-0. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 10, 1985 APPROVED REMOVAL OF ITEM (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22 & 23) APPROVED '-- -.......... 7. Mayor Echols advised that if the Council granted the request it could be set for July 22, 1985. Councilman Ramsey stated that he thought some of the Council members would be absent at the July 22nd meeting and before the hearing was set to make sure all would be present. Councilman Newman and Councilwoman Moody advised they would not be present at the July 22nd meeting. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to grant the appeal hearing to be heard August 12, 1985. Motion carried 7-0. 8. Mayor Pro Tem Davis'moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve SO 85-9. Mrs. Virginia Rader, 5004 Oak Timber Ct., Colleyville, appeared before the Council. ...... Mrs. Rader stated she wished to have the sign at 8011 and 8013 Grapevine Highway. Mrs. Rader stated that two years ago a permit was granted for one sign, but another sign was needed. Councilman Ramsey asked Mrs. Rader if she would be satisfied with the size of the sign. Mrs. Rader stated yes. Motion carried 7-0. *9. *10. *11. '- June 24, 1985 Page 2 PZ 85-59 REQUEST FOR APPEAL HEARING - RICHLAND HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST APPROVED SO 85-9 REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIGN ORDINANCE - 8011 AND 8013 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY APPROVED GN 85-57 ORDINANCE NO. 1236 ADOPTION OF 1985 REVISED BUILDINC CODE APPROVED GN 85-58 ORDINANCE NO. 1237 ADOPTION OF 1985 UNIFORM PLUMBIN( CODE APPROVED GN 85-59 ORDINANCE NO. 1238 ADOPTION OF 1985 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE APPROVED June 24, 1985 Page 3 - ",--,. *12. GN 85-60 AMENDMENT TC ORDINANCE NO. 1811 REGULATION USE OF PARKS SYSTEM APPROVED 13. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve GN 85-61. Councilman Kenna stated that in the preamble to this item it seemed that the City missed the fact that the driveway would open onto Rufe Snow Drive. Councilman Kenna stated that if in fact the plans showed the location of the drive and the plans were approved, he thought it would be very wrong to come back and require someone to change the plans. Councilman Kenna stated he would recommend that in the future when construction plans were reviewed, more attention should be payed to such things as driveways. GN 85-61 REQUEST OF RICK TUGGLE FOR A DRIVEWAY OPENING ONTC RUFE SNOW DRIVE DENIED Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that if the driveway was overlooked he did not think the burden should be placed on someone to change their plans. Councilman Ramsey stated that the ordinance was clear concerning curb cuts on Rufe Snow Drive and just because the staff overlooked something that was in violation of the ordinance, it did not give everyone carte blanche to go out and do what they wanted to. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he did not think there was an ordinance against this, but it was at the discretion of the Public Works Director to approve curb cuts on Rufe Snow Drive. Mr. Line stated that the ordinance gave the Public Works Director the authority to review and approve curb cuts onto any street. Mr. Line stated the initial review of these plans was from the standpoint of looking at the construction of the house and it would have been very desirable if the driveway had been noticed. Mayor Pro Tem Davis called for the question. Motion to approve failed 5-2; Councilmen Fisher, Newman and Ramsey and Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody voting against; Councilman Kenna and Mayor Pro Tem Davis voting for. Mr. Rick Tuggle appeared before the Council. '- Mr. Tuggle stated that if had known he would not be allowed to make a curb cut on Rufe Snow he would not ---- -.......... '-- *14. '-- *15. *16. *17. '-- *19. *20. '- have built the house. Mr. Tuggle stated he had submitted his plans and they were approved and it would be a tremendous cost to change the driveway. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt Mr. Tuggle had done what he was suppose to and his reason for wanting to approve the request was because the construction was already started. Councilman Ramsey stated the discussion was out of order and the Council should move to the next item. 18. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to table PW 85-18 for two weeks to allow the Staff and CIP Committee time to evaluate the bid and possibly talk to the contractor about the long number of days. Motion carried 7-0. June 24, 1985 Page 4 GN 85-62 ANNUAL FUND TRANSFER APPROVED GN 85-63 CITY OF WATAUGA ANNEXATION REQUEST APPROVED GN 85-64 EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS FOR FLORY STREET PROJECT - RESOLUTION NO. 85-13 APPROVED PU 85-21 PREVAILING WAGE RATE DETERMINATION ORDINANCE NO. 1240 APPROVED PW 85-18 CHAPMAN DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS BID TABULATION TABLED PAY 85-20 PAYMENT FOR MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN MAPPING APPROVED PAY 85-21 MORGAN MEADOWS EAST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE 111 APPROVED -,-- '-- '- *21. *22. *23. 24. John Bushong, Deputy, Civil Air Patrol, 1357 Francis, Fort Worth, appeared before the Council. Mr. Bushong gave the Council a briefing on the emergency services offered by the Civil Air Patrol. Mr. Bushong stated he was offering the services of the Civil Air Patrol in any emergency the City might have. Mr. Bushong stated that anytime the City might need help, feel free to call. 25. Ramsey moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to adjourn the meeting of June 24, 1985. June 24, 1985 Page 5 PAY 85-22 WATAUGA TRUNK LINE PHASE I, PAY ESTIMATE 112 APPROVED PAY 85-23 HARWOOD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PAY ESTIMATE 112 APPROVED PAY 85-24 GLENVIEW DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS PAY ESTIMATE 112 APPROVED CITIZEN PRESENTATION ADJOURNMENT Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary . . , - CITY OF . NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 l SUbject: Zoning Application Amundson Road at Precinct 7/8/85 ~ COuncil Meeting Date: 1i~neROadAgenda Number: PZ 85-36 Department: Planning and Develqpment ~ ~ ~ ~~ L This Zoning Application is pT..ented on the existing residential tract located on the southwest corner of Amua4sonROad at Precinct Line bad.. . The subject property is 4.77 acres in size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agricultura.to 0-1 Office District. The applicants stated intent is to build sn office parkwñ:ichwould be compatible with their surrounding residential' de~elopment . - The Staff made several comments on the proposed request for the Commission's consideration. (1) Both Precinct Lil)e Road and Amundson Road are. proposed for widening in the Thoroughfare Plan. PrecinetLine Road is projected to be a six lane divided street. Amundson Road is projected to be a four lane undivided straet.Both these improvements will require additional street right of way dedication from the subject property and participation in the street eonstrúction. (2) In the proposed. laud use of the area no commercial Uses are projected. However, recently the Commission.:a.nd the City Council approved a si1nilar request for office zoning on the opposite'corner ofihis intersection. The Planning and ZoningCo'llimissionrø¢ommended approval ofZouing Application PZ 85-36. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufftcient Funds Available ~:~Slgnatu~ t~~r CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director P~np. 1 nf 1 '"';. , .' ~) Page 3 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 ( ( --- Chairman Bowen said some of the 1 show offsets of 30 foot sid rds 25 foot front yards, they must 25 feet. Mr. t said they would correct at. He also stated they would get sewer from North Richland Hills. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 85-34 subject to the Engineer's comments with the exception of item 1. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 3. PZ 85-36 Request of Hanson Properties tó rezone Tracts 3A1 & 3A2, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to 0-1 (Office District). This property is located at the southwest corner of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. David Barfield came forward to represent Hanson Properties. He said they had purchased most of the land from Amundson to Martin. He said they plan to build an office which will resemble houses. Mr. Barfield said they want it to match Nob Hill Addition which will have brick streets and old type street lights. He said they already have 0-1 zoning on the other side of the street. Mr. Barfield said he had talked with the neighbors and they have no objections. He said the office would look like the one on Harwood Road and it will be deed restricted. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. '-- · \.~.; Page 4 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 ( 4. ...... - ',-- PZ 85-36 APPROVED PZ 85-37 ( Gene Vinson, 3017 Oakridge Drive, came forward. He asked what they plan to do to improve the streets. He said they have traffic problems now, but he had rather have this instead of a 7-11 store. Mr. Royston stated that Precinct Line is proposed for a 6-lane thoroughfare and Amundson a 4-lane and Mr. Barfield will build half of the road. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-36. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Hanson Properties and Billy G. Mitchell to rezone Tracts 3B7, 3B3 3C3, and 3C4, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their prese classifications of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) and AG (Agr" ulture) to R-6-T (Townhouses and G den Homes District). This pro ty is located on the west side Precinct Line Road, approxima 1,100 feet north of Martin Dr Bowen opened the Public called for those wishing favor of this request to forward. David Barfield came forward. He said they had bought the Coulson property which had been zoned Multi-Family for about 15 years which allows 19.8 units per acre. He said they have added Mr. Mitchell's property to allow them to have from 125 to 128 units spread over more land. Mr. Barfield said they plan to build garden homes which will sell from $80,000 to $120,000. He said they will be 1,200 square foot minimum instead of the required 1,000 square feet and would be of the same structure as the Nob Hill Addition. f ( '- . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas Apri 1 1, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-36 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG 10 0-1 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 72 "- We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. CIJ, ~ P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works tvir. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works fv¡r. Richard Royston, Director of Development '- Zoning Review PZ 85-36 Page 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG::r:.:OFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METR0/267-3367 "- ~ Metro: 498-3242 (~ 'Job" BARFIELD REAtTORS Office: 281-1811 700 Harwood Road, Hurst, Texas 76054 May 14, 1985 Wanda Calvert Ci ty of North Richland Hills Wanda: We have sold our home and adjoining acreage at 9224 Amundson to Roger Hanson. He needs this put back on the agenda for rezoning. Thanks, 7/ZM.dn7í~ Mrs. W. N. Ratcliff '- I .:::::::::::..::: :..:.. .... ::::::..... '. ::::..::: .:.:.....: . .:~..- -.:.. .:. ~ . -. ~ .. ::::::::. :::: ..::::~::.:: ::::::.... :::::: e::::::.. ..:::::: .e. ..... . .....:.:.:.:... ........... ...:....... ....:.:.:.:.:..);:::::j ............... ........... ':':':':'.' .~.:.:........... :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.: ..:....:.:..:.:.:~~ . ".:.:," . ~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.: , , INCORPORATED Specialists in Construction APARTMENTS COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL LAN D DEVELOPM ENT ROGER J. HANSON, President May 10, 1985 (817)861-2611 . City of North Richlans P.O. Box 18609 North1Richland Hills, Texas Attn: Mrs. Wanda Calvert Dear Mrs. Calvert, We are now the record owner of the Ratcliff tract at the corner of Precinct and Amundson Road. That deed is recorded in Tarrant County Deed Record,~filed 05/02/85, clerk's file #540640. Please put us back op the adjenda for zoning. Thank you.. Sincerely, ~~ David Barfield .... . 2-fJ "-- ~. 100 EAST sour: . STREET, SUITE 500 · ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76010 ORDINANCE NO. 1241 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-36 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to 0-1. BEING a 4.771-acre tract in the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, Tarrant County, Texas; said tract being the same tract of land conveyed to William Ratcliff by Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 4696, Page 691 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; said tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of the Ratcliff tract and being the intersection of the west right-of-way line of Precinct Line ~oad and the south right-of-way line of Amundson Road; said point also being 22.92 feet South and 21.0 feet West of the northeast corner of the T.K. Martin Survey; THENCE South 00 degrees 25 minutes 36 seconds West along the said west line of Precinct Line Road for a distance of 419.85 feet to a point for corner; said point being the northeast corner of a 4.50-acre tract owned by Joe Bill Fox as recorded in Volume 7842, Page 1537 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 55 minutes 00 seconds West along the south line of the Ratcliff tract and the north line of the Fox tract for a distance of 494.77 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North for a distance of 417.18 feet to a point for corner in the south line of Amundson Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds East along the said south line of Amundson Road for a distance of 498.43 feet to the point of beginning and containing 4.771 acres of land. '- Page 2 ',--- This property is located at the southwest corner of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. f}_ /J;¿¿ A '\ ¡tfë11 ~/: ~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~ê~~ SEfR~T PLANNIN~ AÑD- ING-- MMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CA,SE NO. PZ-85-36 IS HEREBY REZONED 0-1 THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '- LW' ¡Ir.,....... . I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS L L L Department: Planning and DeV'fal9Ptnent COuncil Meeting Date: 7/8/85 SUbject: Zoning Applica.tion '.8010 Bedford Euless Road' Agenda Number: PZ 85-60 This Zoning Applicatiøn.isi'P;t'ê&e~t'4ton the existing res~"~~~n,.t .Site on the south side of Bedford-Euless ROad.,eEJt.()fi~.¥'POrt Freeway. The pre~1.o\t~/tenant was Jamie's Restaurant. The requelJ~~~)rezonìng l.s from C-2 Commerc:1.a,~t()C-2 SU Commercial Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholi.c~~"t!:rag.EJ. The applicants are reno1rfit;~1.:~g~he existing restaurant to house a Tony Roma' s/}tes~~1.1rant.., The Specific Use P~r1J11.t.:.,~Uld allow the Sale of Alcoholic Beverages wìttrt~e'opdservice. The previous iqceupant of this site had a Specific Use Permit for tbâ.t> restaurant. The Planning and Zoning Co.-issiónrecommended approvalof Zoning Application PZ 85-60. ~ ~~ t ~ Source of Funds: 8onds(GO/Rev,) Oper ng Budget er Finance Review Acct. Number. . Sufficient Funds AvaUable . 11 Ætr;(~ f t Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director \. Paae 1 of i 1 - Page 12 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 ---- RECESS BACK TO ORDER 7. PZ 85-60 '-- PZ 85-60 APPROVED \.......- ( ( Chairman Bowen called a recess at 8:30 P. M. Chairman Bowen called the meeting back to order at 8:40 P. M. with the same members present. Request of Roma Corporation to rezone Lot 3, Block 2, Cochran Addition, from its present classification of C-2 (Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located at 8010 Bedford-Euless Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Susan Riess with Roma Corporation came forward. She said they plan to have a Tony Roma restaurant which would serve Bar-B-Q and Chicken. She said they have three stores located in Addison, Dallas, and Houston. Ms. Riess stated that the previous restaurant located there sold alcoholic beverages. Chairman Bowen said they would need the name of an individual to put the Specific Use Permit in when they go to the City Council. Ms. Riess said that would be fine. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-60. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. - ( ( ----- . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 17, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-60 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-2 TO C-2-SU REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 133 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~ Oæ--:- RIC·n-- n. -- un /í.f' RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development .,-, Zoning Review PZ 85-60 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 - '-- ~~ ORDINANCE NO. 1243 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-60 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-2 to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.. BEING Lot 3, Block 2, Cochran Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-136, Page 66, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at 8010 Bedford-Euless Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONIN JUNE, 1985. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-60 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: "--- REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .. ..#I"~-. \.- . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and De'Velopment Department: Subject: Zoning Applicatio* Nortbeast Corner Rufe at ·¢b~maI1 J.oad Oouncil Meeting Date: 7/8/85 Snow Drive Agenda Number: PZ 85-64 This Zoning Application' :f.s·ipreSeJ'1te~on the vacant C01la\et'c~al/pJ:operty located on the northeast corner of Ruf.SnowÐriveaJ'ld Chapman Road~Tb,es'Ubject tract is approximately 1. 9 acres:f.nisi~e:. ~~:requested re~onitt'~~ f:rom C-1 Commercial to C-2 Commercial. The applicantbat!'ane>ption contract on a.~~1:'tiot\of the property with Mobil Oil Company. Tþe.intent/of /tbE!application is toa.1..¥wMobil to develop a Self-Service Station andconvieuce,..tore on the site inclu41nganautomatic car wash. The addition of the car wash requires the C-2 zoning. The Staff noted to the<:o1IUII.1.s~ion that the Thoroughfare P.1..a. for this area requires that Chapman Road be improvf!clto/a.68 foot right of way with,*!.£eetof pavement. The City is currently reconstructi118Q1ìapman/.R()ad under anasses~~p:r()gram to a 41 foot pavement section. Thedev.lopers<ofthis tract: havebeettiJladeaware of the additional requirements for the stì"eetaudbaveindicated their will.iugness to participate in the construction. The Planning and ZoningC01lllà:f.ssionrecommended approval of Zoning .' application PZ 85-64. ~ j~ ~ j Soutce.ofF"ods: l. So. odS~OIR.i e. Vo.).. ~ t ~~__.,)):£I1/~ J .'0' . ." 0 PeP 0 0 , enIH~I!Ct$l!l~ .... .. I City Manager j01TVySUNCIL' ACTION ITEM L Finance . Review Acct. Number" Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director - Page 1 of 1 .... Page 15 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 --- '-- 11. PZ 85-64 PZ ~,-64 AF VED ',,-- ( ( Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those w~shing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Peggy Krussell came forward. She said they wish to provide a carwash service for their customers. She showed a picture to the Commission of a Mobil Carwash. Ms. Krussell said it would be a self service, fully enclosed 35,000 square feet carwash. She said this property is surrounded by 12 acres of Commercial zoning. Ms. Krussell said the closest carwash to this proposed site is one block north of 820 on Lewis Drive. She said they had several studies made which show the carwash is preferred by their customers. She said it is free to customers who buy gas. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-64. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. j- ! ì -- '-- -- "---- (- ( . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-64 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-l TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 76 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we couid adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~~ RWA/ra Enc 1 osu res cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-64 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 55; :JFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ( ) -"~ City of North Richland Hills Attn: Wanda Calvert Richard Royston Planning and Zoning Department 3905 Diamond Loch E. North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 '\ 4900 Circle Ridge Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76114 May 14, 1985 Re: 34 acre tract of land at the Northeast Corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Road in North Richland Hills Dear Ms. Calvert and Hr. Royston: This letter serves as our permission for Mobil Oil Corpora- tion to request the zoning change on the Northeast Corner of Rufe Snow and Chapman Road from C-l to C-2. We appreciate your AVP:dm '- '-- Arnold V. Pent, III ì.... ~",- ORDINANCE NO. 1245 ..... AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 ..... I.... ..... AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-64 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-1 to C-2. ..... I.... BEING a tract of land lying in the William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: I.... COMMENCING at the Northwest corner of said Mann Survey; ì.... THENCE South a distance of 1355.09 feet to a point for corner; I.... THENCE North 89 degrees 47 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 37.55 feet to an existing ~ inch steel rod in the East right-of-way line of Rufe Snow Drive; ì.... THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds East along said East right-of-way line a distance of 1307.37 feet to an existing ~ inch steel rod at the intersection of said East right-of-way line with the North right-of-way line of Chapman Road for the point of beginning of the herein described tract: I.... I.... THENCE South 89 degrees 48 minutes 26 seconds East along the North right-of-way line of said Chapman Road a distance of 400.00 feet to a point for corner; , I.... THENCE North 00 degrees 20 minutes 49 seconds West departing from said North right-of-way line and parallel with the East right-of-way line of Rufe Snow Road a distance of 210.00 feet to a point for corner; ..... THENCE N- ':h 89 degrees 48 minutes 26 seconds West parallel with the North right-of-- -1Y line of said Chapman Road a distance of 400.00 feet to a point for corner in the East ri;o't-of-way line of Rufe Snow Road; l '--- THENCE South 00 degrees lÜ minutes 49 seconds East along said East right-of-way line a distance of 210.00 feet to the point of beginning and embracing 83,998.2 square feet or 1.928 acre of land. I.... ~ -~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 Planning and Development Counclf Meeting Date: 7/8/85 i .. Department: J'-~SUbject: J Zoning Applic.~ion Southeast Corner GlenviewDrive àCD._Drive Agenda Number: PZ 85-66 This Zoning ApplicationupréÞntedonthe existing residential tract located on the east side of Dawn Drivehétwèen GlènV.iew Drive and Harmona~nItoàd. The property is approximately 14.8 acres1;nsi~e.. . . The requested rezon1;ng~froa It-3 Single Fa1Dily to R-6-T Townhome. The applica1Î1t,súbtllitted a site plan with thespplication indicating a proposed development of 82 units. . The Staff review of thecproposèd devêlopment noted seve1;'alitemsfot the Commission's consideration. , ~ t r (1) The project proposedinth4!' .site Plan is not, byd.finition, a townhome development. The unitspl'opos.c:tatefree-standing indivt~Ualslngle family dwellings. The units could meet the~uilding .size.for single family.develo,..nt with the exception of lot size. The statedÖ1.1rp()sefo1!the Townhome distriçttstbedevelopment of "attached" unit construct1.on~ The proposed project conforms to the recently-approved R-8 Single Family Distriêt. / (2) The letter submitting th8,-pplication makes #hestatement that all units will have rear entry garagesandbe:Serilced by private alleys only. . However, the building layouts submitted with·theapplicat'ionindicate only front entry garages. (3) The subject tract<issuttounded by single family uses with the exception of the LR property on the southwestco.rner of Dawn and Glenview. J ~ The Planning and ZoningCommis.ionrecommended denial oftheR-6-T Townhome request and recommended that the CityCouncilapp.rove the suhstitutionofthe R-8 Single Family Detached Zero-Lot-Line Zone for this project. L· Finance Review Aoct. Number Sufficient FuAds Available - 12~ ant Head Signa,ture , . 1 City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director - I Page 1 of 1 '-- Page 16 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1?85 ( ( '--. 12. PZ 85-65 Request of R & G Associates a portion of Tract lA, John Survey, Abstract 1753, from its present classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-1 (Commerc ). This property is located on e south side of Watauga Road, appr imately 500 feet east of Rufe Sn Drive. Chairman Bowen opene the Public Hearing and for those wishing to speak in fav of this request to please come ward. F rar, Dallas, came forward. his property lies between C-I zoning with R-7-MF to the He said they propose to nnect their street with the street across Watauga Road, but the cuI de sac will be temporary. Mr. Farrar said they will dedicate an additional right-of-way for the widening of Watauga Road. He said they would work with the City Staff since it will be a divided street. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-65 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-65. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. 13. PZ 85-66 Request of Bill Fenimore to rezone Tracts 2A1, 2A2, 2A2B, 2A2A, 2A3, 2EI, 2E2, & 2E3, M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from their present classification of R-3 (Single Family) to R-6-T (Townhouses and Garden Homes District). This property is located at the southeast corner of Glenview Drive and Dawn Drive. "- Page 17 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 '-- ( ( Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He stated this property is located at the corner of Glenview and Dawn Drive; it is 1,185 feet along Dawn Drive and 540 feet along Glenview Drive. Mr. Stembridge said there would be.80+ lots of high quality, detached garden homes with a masonry fence. He said they would range in size from 1,200 square feet to 2,400 square feet; Pat Marin, 6412 Harmonson, came forward. She asked if it run along Dawn Street to Honey Lane. Mr. Stembridge said it runs along Dawn Drive and is bounded by Harmonson Road and Glenview Drive. Ms. Marin said she is very much in favor of this request. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Edmond Howell, 4033 Honey Lane, came forward. He said this area consists of the young adults and the elderly folk. He said they have a very nice view of the Fort Worth sky line. Mr. Howell asked if there would be a private alley. He stated that others see them as low income people, but some have lived there 23 to 30 years and do not wish to be encroached on. Mr. Howell said the plat looked like there were quite a few lots and feel they would have a box car effect. Page 18 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 '- '-- ( ( Mr. Tucker said there would be drives in the back with rear entry garages. Mr. Howell said he felt there would be noise and they would disrupt the view. He said when their peace and quiet and the view .go, we will have to move. He said he is for progress as long as it does not infringe on them. Mr. Howell said he felt they would be rooted out and he is against this rezoning. Russ Borson, 6408 King Arthur Court, came forward. He said this is .an exclusive, nice residential area and they have 4 apartment complexes. He said this is a mixed use and enough is enough. Mr. Tucker stated these will be single family detached houses that will range from 1,200 to 2,400 square feet with rear entry garages. He said they propose to build single family detached houses similar to Diamond Loch and at the prices they will be, they would not buy for a rent house. Thomas Jacques, 6513 Memory Lane, came forward. He said the Valleyview apartments did not do good as townhouses so they went as apartments. Vicki Borson, 6408 King Arthur Court, came forward. She said she wanted to buy one for her mother, but they were never for sale. Mr. Tucker said the ordinance has been re-written since then; they must show a site plan and lots which is protection for the property owners. Mr. Howell asked how many units per acre is R-3. Mr. Tucker said approximately 4 per acre. Page 19 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 ( ( '- Mr. Howell asked how many there would be in this zoning. Mr. Tucker said there are 82 lots in 15 acres. Mr. Howell asked if they thought it could be developed in nice homes as Diamond Loch. Chairman Bowen said R-3 zoning is the smallest single family dwelling. Larry Martinez, 4025 Honey Lane, came forward. He said he is in opposition to this request. He said he came here from the John Petersmith area to get away from this. He said it is now a field and this would invite more traffic and crime in the area. Pat Marin came forward. She said someone has a misunderstanding, the value of these houses will be in excess of $100,000; they will not increase crime, they will raise the value of the homes in the area. Ms. Marin said they would be a plus for the neighborhood and she had nine people stand who are for the rezoning. Mr. Tucker said he figured and they would run from $92,500 to $250,000. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-66 DENIED, BUT REQUEST BE SENT TO CITY COUNCIL Mr. Tucker said this request does not meet the R-6-T zoning, but does meet the R-8 zoning. He made the motion to deny PZ 85-66 for R-6-T, but recommend R-8 and be placed on the City Council agenda. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash. '-- ..." .. , Page 20 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 ( '-.. 14. PZ 85-67 '-- ( Chairman Bowen stated it does better fit the zero lot line zoning. This gives more protection, but it allows homes with small lots and puts a 1,200 square foot minimum instead of the 1,000, requires them to have garages, and they can be attached or detached. The motion carried 4-0. Request of Clifford A. Pearson to rezone Tract lA, Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399, from its present classification of AG _ (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Fá This property is located on t south side of Bursey Road and th est side of Douglas Lane. Chairman Bowen open the Public Hearing and calle for those wishing to speak in fav of this request to please come rward. Delbert embridge, Consulting Engin r, came forward. He said to the outh of this property is R-3 zing, to the west is Commercial, and across the street is in Keller and they request a zoning change to R-3. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-67. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together but would be voted on separately. (, r '- . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-66 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-3 TO R-6-T REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 147 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. R~~ '-- RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '-- Zoning Review PZ 85-66 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . . c:OFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ',-'> .; _', )- 'J:; ~ In regard to o'ur \tli'ent' s zoning application a 14.787-acre tract in North Richland Hills. ~t is our client's intention to dedicate to the public all the streets. We would note that the Elevations, Floor Plans and Typical Lot Layout are only indicative of the type of construction and approximate size. It is our client's intention to place a deed restriction allowing ,only rear entry garages from an alley to be construct~d~ :"~-.~:.;i;:;:-,, ,:' ,':' _J': '" r, ':.::~: ".\ ': '. , iç':J;:,,~)\-~t,~~;"~"J:-.':h :" "There will be no ~umpsters on the project as tras~~i~kui curbside. J.F./et '-- ~-': 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 -- ORDINANCE NO. 1247 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-66 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-3 to R-6-T. BEING a tract of land in the M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all that tract conveyed to E. E. Jeanes as recorded in Volume 3670, Page 112, and tract conveyed to E. E. Jeanes and recorded in Volume 3670, Page 115, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point at the intersection of the south right-of-way of Glenview Drive and the East right-of-way of Dawn Drive, said point being the Northwest corner of said Jeanes Tract, Volume 3670, Page 112; THENCE South along the east R.O.W. of Dawn Drive for a distance of 1210.00feet to a point in the centerline of Harmonson Road for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 37 minutes East along the centerline of Harmonson Road for a distance of 540.12 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North along the east property line of Tract 2E for a distance of 1210.00 feet to a point for corner in Glenview Drive; THENCE North 89 degrees 37 minutes West along the said south line of Glenview Drive for a distance of 540.12 feet to the point of beginning and containing 14.787 acres of land more or less; SAVE AND EXCEPT a 0.2163 acre strip dedicated for street along Glenview Drive. -- Page 2 '-' This property is located at the southeast corner of Glenview Drive and Dawn Drive. . DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. ~¿~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZðNING COMMISSION I' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-66 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ',-- --..-~ . ¡ L r" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . 7f8f8~ CounCil Meetmg Date: 5 I PZ 85-67 Agenda Number: Planning an<1ÐeV$;¡,optll.$t1t Department: SUbject: Zoning Applic..tionSotttbSide of Bursey Road ~ndWê.t Side of Ðduglàs~*~ L I L This Zoning Application>is p!:,e.t!t.'fted.on the "tacant 25 plqs acre tract located on the southwest corner of Burs.y 1{oa4..t1d1>ouglaè'/Lane.. '.l'her,:q,tJested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-3 Sing~~ F~;I;;I,:Y~e.:f.dential. Thepurp()~eif0J:'the request is to allow the applicants to developa<singl$fami1ysubdivisioniinaeeordance with the R-3 criteria. . r L L L L l The Staff review of the:ton:t.tl.tequ..~tnoted that· both Burseyltøad and' Douglas Lane are shown on the proposed T~oro~gbf'ate~~.an. Bursey is t.o btlamajor collector street requiring 70 feet of right(t~"ay"nd48feet of pa"te.men.t. .>Douglas Lane is to be a secondary collector with60féet.ofright of way. and 37 feet of pavement. , .' . . -". ...- . ~ It was also noted thatt_é.subdiVisiQn1mmediately.oqth()fthis property is zoned R-3-1S00 Single Family The Planning and Zoning CòtInI1issi()n recotmnended thatZonihg(Applieation PZ 85-67 be approved. I L-- r-- I , ~ ~ L ,/ j I Bon9s.(ßOlRev,) - ~. Operating Budget . ---- ......·i·· '.. i... ..._ j<;:¡?.L··~;¡S(~ha\üre, . . ../~~r L -CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Source of Funds: Finance Review Acct. Number . Sufficient FundS Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 ! '- '-- ',- ....--> .. Page 20 P & Z Hinutes June 13, 1985 « 14. PZ 85-67 PZ 85-67 APPROVED [ Chairman Bowen stated better fit the zero 10 e This gives m rotection, but it allows s with small lots and puts a 1,200 square foot minimum instead of the 1,000, requires them to have garages, and they can be attached or detached. The motion carried 4-0. Request of Clifford A. Pearson to rezone Tract lA, Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399, from its present classification of AG _ (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Fámily). This property is located on the south side of Bursey Road and the west side of Douglas Lane. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He said to the south of this property is R-3 zoning, to the west is Commercial, and across the street is in Keller and they request a zoning change to R-3. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-67. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen st two would be heard together but would be voted on separately. ( ( -- '-... . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas May 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ,¡ RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-67 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-3 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 40 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. '-- R~0ÛL RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '- Zoning Review PZ 85-67 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . '::;:::,)FORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 '-- '- ORDINANCE NO. 1248 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-67 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-3. BEING a 25,409 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399, Tarrant County, Texas, also being all of that certain tract of land as described in deed to Clifford & Verree Hawkins Pearson and recorded in Volume 6489, Page 279, County Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a ~ inch iron pin, found, being the intersection of the south line of Bursey Road (County Road No. 3194) with the west line of Douglas Lane (County Road No. 3051); THENCE South 00 degrees 26 minutes 02 seconds East, 873.26 feet along said west line to a 7/8 inçh iron pin, found, being the northwest corner of North Richland Estates Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills and recorded in Volume 388-119, Page 24, said County Records: THENCE South 88 degrees 00 minutes 40 seconds West, along the north line of said North Richland Estates, at 793.05 feet passing the northwest corner of said addition, and continuing in all 1460.56 feet to a ~ inch iron pin, found, being the southeast corner of the remainder of that certain tract of land as described in deed to Morgan D. Hawkins, etux, recorded in Volume 3472, Page 224, said County Records; THENCE North 00 degrees 03 minutes 48 seconds West, 923.52 feet along the east line of said Hawkins tract to a 5/8 inch iron pin, set, being the northeast corner of said tract, from which a ~ inch iron pin bears North 00 degrees 1 minutes 48 seconds West 2.03 feet, said 5/8 inch iron pin being on the s th line of the aforementioned Bursey Road; Page 2 '- Thence north 89 degrees 59 minutes 02 seconds East, 506.00 feet along said south line to a 5/8 inch iron pin, set, from which a ~ inch iron pin bears North 46 degrees 04 minutes 48 seconds West, 0.79 feet, said 5/8 inch iron pin being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Pearson Subdivision, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills and recorded in Volume 388-141, Page 95, said County Records; THENCE South 00 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West, 392.11 feet along the west line of said Lot 1 to a ~ inch iron pin, found, being the southwest corner of said Lot 1; THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes 22 seconds East, along the south _line of said Block 1 at 220.21 feet passing the southeast corner of said Block 1, also being the southwest corner of that certain tract of land as described in deed to Raymond D. Fried, etal, and recorded in Volume 7122, Page 1338, said County Records, and continuing along the south line of said Fried Tract in all 515.25 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin, set, being the southeast corner of said Fried Tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 02 minutes 38 seconds East, 392.47 feet along the east line of said Fried Tract to an ~ inch iron pin, found, being the northeast corner of said Fried Tract, also being on the south line of the aforementioned Bursey Road; Thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 02 seconds East, 432.96 feet along said south line to the point of beginning and containing 25.409 acres of land, more or less; "- Page 3 '- This property is located on the south side of Bursey Road and the west side of Douglas Lane. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. f)~Vltj? ~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ¡' ~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-67 IS HEREBY REZONED R-3 THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '-- . :.. . .. , L" [I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning andD.eVeJ,.optDent Subject: Zoning Application West of Precinct Line Road·. '. . North of Nob Hill SUbdivision ÇouncHMeetlng Date: 7/8/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-70 L L This Zoning Applicat1on.ispr..ent~d..on the residentialt.t'açtlocated west of Precinct Line Road and north 0t<tbee~*~ti"giN'Ob.Hill Subdivis10n~'.rherequested rezoning:Ls from AG Agriculture. .to"'72..~~g~~>!'amily . The purpose!Çlri~Þ~'t"eques t is to allow the applicants to develoPS~~.leFa1l~~Y<.10ts on the tractin~0'Ð.f'o~ance with the R-2 Zone. The proposed SubdivisionWQUldbe litn extension of the Nab <Hill Plat. r L r L The Planning and ZoningCOlDIDi..iottrsc:ommended approvalo~Zol1i.ngApplication PZ 85-70. r L i L. r- ! f fi l ) , ¡ ~ ~ \..,. ! J ~ I i l r~ T L - Finance Review Acct. Number. Sufficient Funds Available .....~~ O~pa\1ménl Heé4;~Ij¡í\~I~'e . ' . ... ·IIY Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION· ITEM . Finance Director PaQe 1 Of 1 .""'" .. . JiI (' Page 23 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 - "'-- PZ 85-68 DENIED 17. PZ 85-70 '-- ( Chairman Bowen said he does not feel this would be spot zoning because there is Commercial all along Dav' Boulevard. V. L. Gibson, 8333 Odell forward. He said he had for 33 years and he bel' ves it is spot zoning and feel ey should keep Commercial away fro residential. Mr. Gibson said they ve 28 acres of Heavy Industria to the south of his property and is would make Commercial the north. He said they have reta' across the street and in between s residential. Mr. Gibson said ey are only asking R-3 .for 270 fee of the 1000 feet which is no b fer. He said he felt this was oing against the Master Plan. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Bowen said he was not sure R-3 was a good plan for the small tract because there was no entrance to it. Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 85-68. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 3-1 with Mr. Tucker voting against denial. Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 85-69. This motion was seconded ~y Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 3-1 with Chairman Bowen voting against denial. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together but voted on separately. Request of Roger & Joan Hanson to rezone Lot 4, Block 1, Martin Addition, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located west of Precinct Line Road and adjacent to Nqb Hill Addition. .:-' J~ " . . Page 24 P & Z w~ June LJ 18. PZ 85-71 PZ 85-70 APPROVED PZ 85-71 APPROVED '--- r ( Request of Roger & Joan Hanson to rezone Tract 3Y and part of Tract 3U2, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located east of Crane Road and adjacent to Nob Hill Addition. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. David Barfield came forward to represent Mr. & Mrs. Hanson. He said these would be part of the Nob Hill Addition and is located at the top of the hill. He said they plan to deep a large oak tree in the middle of the cuI de sac. He said the street would be made of brick. Mr. Barfield said the other request, they had to buy to have access into the addition. He said they bought 1~ acres, but got only one lot out of it. He said the lots would be the same size and criteria as Nob Hill. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to these requests to please Come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-70. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-71. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. -' ,.. .. --.. ( ( -'-- . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLANDHILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-70 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 72 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ¿¿J.~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enc losures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '-- Zoniryg Review PZ 85-70 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 - ~' .. ---- ORDINANCE NO. 1249 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CIty COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-70 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. The following described tract or parcel of land situated in the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of a tract as recorded on Page 720 of Volume 6932 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod and being the northwest corner of said tract as recorded on Page 720 of Volume 6932 in the Tarrant County Deed Records said point also being the Southwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded on Page 73 of Volume 388-172 in the Tarrant County Plat Records and being by deed South a distance of 1055.65 feet, West a distance of 733.99 feet, and south 00 degrees 34 minutes 05 seconds East a distance of 35.01 feet from the Northeast corner of said T.K. Martin Survey; THENCE North 89 degrees 01 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 257.29 feet to an iron rod at the southeast corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin Addition; THENCE South 50 degrees 07 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 37.90 feet; THENCE South 00 degrees 52 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 307.55 feet t an iron rod; THENCE North 89 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 78.87 feet to an iron rod; THENCE f;crth 89 degrees 54 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 208.90 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 00 degrees 34 minutes 05 seconds West a distance of 327.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 2.163 acres of land. '- · ".. . Of .-. ...'" '-- Page 2 This property is located west of Precinct Line Road and adjacent to Nob Hill Addition. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. ~æ ~;j CHAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-70 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: -- . REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - "'\~ .... CITY OF ¡'lanning an<!DII;'!la~~:;RTHRICH LAND HILLS Council Maallng Date: 7/8/~ Zoning Applicatiøn~.!tQfCrane Road andaa~acent Agenda Number: PZ 85-71 ' tQ.tÞ...!tObH111 SUl:>41V181Qn Department: Subject: I L L This Zoning Application is presented on an existing residential tract located east of Crane Road and north of the existing Nob Hill Subdivision. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to 1-2S1ngle Family. The purpose for the request is to create additional single famlltlots as. an extension of the Nol;J"HillPlat. The addition of these lots to the eXisting plat will require modificatl'cm to', some lots and street in the approved plat. Also dedication of .dditional right of way outside this plat will be required in order to carry 'the propoe.ed street to Crane load. ¡ L. I The Planning and ZoningCotl1Øliseion recommended ·appro~111·j:i)f ~oning App~ication PZ 85-71". L. L I L- f I ~ I ~ Source of Funds: Acct.Nl.JrnÞ~t - Sufficient FunÔ$AvailabJ.e LCITYCOUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance RevIew . Finance Director Paoe 10f 1 '" .. ~. . .. .. Page 23 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 ( ( - Chairman Bowen said he does not feel this would be spot zoning because there is Commercial all along Dav· Boulevard. v. L. Gibson, 8333 Odell St forward. He said he had ved here for 33 years and he bel' ves it is spot zoning and feel ey should keep Commercial away fro residential. Mr. Gibson said they ve 28 acres of Heavy Industria to the south of his property and is would make Commercial the north. He said they have reta· across the street and in between s residential. Mr. Gibson said ey are only asking R-3."for 270 fee of the 1000 feet which is no b fer. He said he felt this was oing against the Master Plan. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Bowen said he was not sure R-3 was a good plan for the small tract because there was no entrance to it. PZ 85-68 DENIED Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 85-68. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 3-1 with Mr. Tucker voting against denial. Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 85-69. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 3-1 with Chairman Bowen voting against denial. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together but voted on separately. - 17. PZ 5-70 Request of Roger & Joan Hanson to rezone Lot 4, Block 1, Martin Addition, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located west of Precinct Line Road and adjacent to Nob Hill Addition. '-- - Page 24 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 18. PZ 85-71 PZ 85-70 APPROVED PZ5-71 AL ]VED "-~ ( ( Request of Roger & Joan Hanson to rezone Tract 3Y and part of Tract 3U2, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located east of Crane Road and adjacent to Nob Hill Addition. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. David Barfield came forward to represent Mr. & Mrs. Hanson. He said these would be part of the Nob Hill Addit~on and is located at the top of the hill. He said they plan to deep a large oak tree in the middle of the cuI de sac. He said the street would be made of brick. Mr. Barfield said the other request, they had to buy to have access 1nto the addition. He said they bought 1~ acres, but got only one lot out of it. He said the lots would be thé same size and criteria as Nob Hill. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-70. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-71. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. - ~ . , I .. -" -.' . ' -\ . ~r ( ( KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS,INC, CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 22, 1985 j ¡ I Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ~ , ì i \ ì ~\ RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-71 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRIDSHEET NO. '71, 72' i ; -: .,... _! We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. L//_ 'tv ~ R~. P.E', ! ì I I 1 \ \ ,,--I ! ! RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development " Zoni':19 Review PZ 85-71 Page 1 1901 CÉNTRAL DR., SUITE 55e . 8EDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267-3367 - .1-' ~ ~- ORDINANCE NO. 1250 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-71 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. BEING a 1,6885 acre tract of land in the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, Tarrant County, Texas; said 1.6885 acre tract being the residue of a 3.2085 acre tract of land conveyed to Willis Davis by Warranty Deed recorded in Volume 7013, Page 2301, of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; said 1.6885 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: ---.t BEGINNING at the most westerly north corner of Nob Hill Addition as recorded in Volume 388-183, Page 54, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; said point also being a southwest corner of the 1.6885 acre tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 02 minutes 26 seconds West along a west line of the 1.6885 acre tract for a distance of 128.06 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 55 minutes 04 seconds West along a south line of the 1.6885 acre tract for a distance of 134.89 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West for a distance of 29.95 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 53 minutes 29 seconds West along a south line of the 1.6885 acre tract for a distance of 329.82 feet to a point for corner in the east line of Crane Road; THENCE North 00 degrees 01 minutes 06 seconds East along the said east line of Crane ~oad for a distance of 30.02 feet to a point for corner; THENCE: cth 89 degrees 55 minutes 55 seconds East along the north line of the 1.6885 acre tract for ~ distance of 329.81 feet to an angle point; "- THENCE North 89 degrees -'] minutes 09 seconds East continuing along the north line of the 1.6885 acre tract for a distance of 94.75 feet to an angle point; ..... ft- . ,. Page 2 ',-- THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes 02 seconds East continuing along the north line of the 1.6885 acre tract for a distance of 39.91 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 89 degrees 17 minutes 06 seconds East continuing along the north line of the 1.6885 acre tract for a distance of 269.50 feet to a point for corner at the northeast corner of the 1.6885 acre tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 40 minutes 07 seconds East along the east line of the 1.6885 acre tract for a distance of 59.16 feet to an angle point at the most northerly northwest corner of Nob Hill Addition; THENCE South 00 degrees 24 minutes 44 seconds East along the common" line between the 1.6885 acre tract and Nob Hill Addition fir a distance of 108.23 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 68 degrees 24 minutes 11 seconds West continuing along the common line for a distance of 91.71 feet to a point for corner; -- ..... THENCE South 31 degrees 32 minutes 26 seconds West continuing along the common line for a distance of 56.50 feet to a point for corner in a curve to the left whose radius bears South 31 degrees 32 minutes 26 seconds West, 50.0 feet; THENCE along said curve to the left in a westerly direction for a distance of 53.39 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 29 degrees 38 minutes 27 seconds West continuing along the common line for a distance of 65.11 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 57 minutes 34 seconds West continuing along the common line for a distance of 73.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 73,550 square feet or 1.6885 acres. '-- - _...)~ ., , Page 3 ',,-- This property is located east of Crane Road and adjacent to Nob Hill Addition. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. ~æ~ CHAr PLANNING AND'ZONING COMMISSION . =fl2~.ß2 ~~ S~ PLANNI~~U ZONIÑG q~MMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-71 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '-- L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS L Department: "-SUbject: L Administration Request for.Ap~al.HearinR· - PZ 85-68 Earl McKinney, Trustee Council Meeting Date: 7/8/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-68 If Council approves the r~quest.for.an Appeal Hearing, theh:ea~irtg can be set for August 26, 1985. Recommendation: Approve/Disapprove Appeal Hearirtg. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Source of Funds: ~ Bonds (GO/Rev.) L Operating Budget Other _ ~ L ~J;.gd~ ¡¿-f-U;<¡t) .... . .ii.~ .1 (j Dep~rtment Head Sign_ILlre '.. . 'City Manager L CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ) N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 '-- June 24, 1985 Office of the City Manager 7301 N.E. Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, Tx 76118 Re: Request for appeal hearing Dear Sir: We would like to request that we be granted a hearing to appeal the '- June 13th ruling of the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to our 15 acres on Davis Blvd. near Odell St. Sincerely, ~ A-Earl McKinney, Trustee -rr5525 ~1acArthur Blvd. #615 Irving, Tx 75038 '- - L r' .... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 7/8/85 Subject: Request f()rA~J'êa7/Heªring - PZ 85-69 Earl McK:f.nney,.Trustee Agenda Number: PZ 85-69 L L If Council approves thereqt.1èstfor/sn Appeal Hearing, the ,hearing can be set for August 26, 1985. f f L Recommendation: Approve/Disapprove AppelilHearing. ~ 1- ~ ~. I ) ~ ~ ~ ¡ ~ l Source of Funds: Bond$ (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ..~J7Æ~fJ~)i< .. .. · . ... ..... r<~ 9'.-{Department HaaQ..~Ig?IIju,r~<. . .... ....... ..... City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM NIA( Finance RevIew Acet. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Avai lable - . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 .,... j~ - '--- June 24, 1985 Office of the City Manager 7301 N.E. Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, Tx 76118 Re: Request for appeal hearing Dear Sir: We would like to request that we be granted a hearing to appeal the June 13th ruling of the Planning and Zoning Board with respect to our 15 acres on Davis Blvd. near Odell St. Sincerely, ~ A.-Earl McKlnney, Trustee ~ 5525 MacArthur Blvd. #615 Irving, Tx 75038 '- - L., CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS l(:epartment: Public Work. Subject: Request of Rick Tu2¡le for a DrivewQ.v OÐeninsæ: onto L Rufe Snow Drive r L I L L I L I ~ I I ~ ~~ ~ ~ I ! ¡,.... i. . . 6-24-85 . ·GN 85-6l Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: Driveway openings areappro.vedby the Public Works Dep.rtment and we usually do not concern ourselves with the openings unle:ss they happen to request one on a thoroughfare or a collector street'~Inthe case... of Rufe Snow, we are limiting 'driv~way openings toasfew.s possible. ! As you know Rufe Snow on the south end has become very congested anq it is important that we eliminate as much conflict on the. north end of Rufe Snow as possible. and to .tT:yt:Þeliminate traffic congestion and ,hazards. ,",;,~,\.~.",;;,::~,.;~,~,.. This house is not cOD1p;Lete at thi$;ùtime and was just under construction when I observed thatitha4a rear ..rage. I made an inqui:t'y to the building inspection depart1Uêl1tandlooked at the sitepl.t\ ætd observed that it showed that there would'bea driveway onto Rufe;$now. . I informed the inspector that rev:tewed the plan to tell thebuilderthttthe would have' to run his drivew.yto the hont of the house on North Park. f·· I do not agree that the driveway is going to cost an additional 5 to 7 dollars as Mr. Tuggle has stated. .1n·his letter and it will not devalue property. I had told Mr. Tuggle that 'there are plepty of other houses have garages on the back of the house with driveways running along the side of the house and suggested that he could run his drivèWáY along either side of this house to get into the aarage which is on tlie raar of the house. Rufe Snow in this area in the future is' going to carry. lot of traffic and if we can eliminate' a traffic hazard by not allowing a driveway opening onto Rufe Snow, we willbè better off in the future. I do not feel that this creates a hardship' on this bùilder. Recommendation: The staff reCOllllDandà,tion is to deny the reqùest of Rick Tuggle for a driveway Opèning onto Rufe Snow. Finance. 'Review Lsource of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev,) Sufficient Funds Available t "'oerating Budget . . '-<he, ~ -e ' ~ ~.~ìñèntl2gnat~ ... CItt1l~ ¡ L CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director PaQe 1 of 1 L, . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ! ¡ I l.. Department: '-, Subject: I ~ , ~ ) 1~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ L )- I ~ Planning and DeveloPment ). .. Request for Easement·ltelease Resolution No.85-1~ '. 5113 Pearl Street Council Meeting Date: 7/8/85 Agenda Number: GN 85-65 . .. - The owners of the residentiall()~l.~ted at 5113 Pe81."lS~t'eet identified as Lot 4R Block 3 Richland Oaksl\ddit10n\iave<~ttquested the relea$eofa>S foot by 100 foot utility. easement on theirprqper~Y~/'rt1eellsement. 1s.1()c~tttd.on . the north side lot line of the lot and apparent~ywasin~ea~'4ias Ilnanchor ease..n~()fsome .sort. The applicants have contact~al1o:f<~~e~ranchise utilitycOD1P~niesand håve provided letters from each oneagreeingtot.\i.proposedrelease..'rt1eCit.y Utility Department has no facilities in the ea$..ent anclh,as no objections to tnerelease. The applicant's purpose fòl' 'tequestiing the release ofth../e¡¡'sè111ent is to clear an encroachment of the sidebµ1.1~1a. line by. the existingre$:f.d.etlq.e. The release. of the easement will allow tneâpplic:ant>topetition the Zoning Board of Adjustment for relief of the existing encroacb1aetít. RECOMMENDATION: It istec01J1met1d~e1ç~atthe C.ity Council.ap'Tove the easement described above on.Lot~tt1J1.ctçk 3 ltichland Oaks Atle1itic:m by Resolution 85-15. ' . release of the approval of Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~i} ~~/~ · Dep ent Head~gn~~ City Manager cJrvcouNC/L ACTION ITEM -- Finance Review Acct. N.umbsr . Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 · - '--..- 4.-- .~-!-,.-~~ -..~..' .. ......--. I ; '\ r~I\1\ ..Ir-t ~""" ðR __ <I), Òo,. ~ ¡' ¡ I [ ¡ ß¡'J I/tJ r ~ i ,.,. l,.. ¿ , I . 'oIt(; -!fiR '"I" ,,;;;¡ ~ r 1'- - - ~_ _d'S DRIVE ~Õi-- N BL.O - y- - _JI II Sf? ~6 I '" Q'!.J1:LL "9 ¿.,nl ,:;--- ~ 'S/)..1 ,~ DR " /'ztâ NO' 07',l. 10'& . _ .!94' , /" - -\...- '-.. . - June 27, 1985 City of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas Re: 5113 Pearl Street North Richland P.ills, Texas lot 4R Block 3 Richland Oaks to the City of Richland Hills, now an Addition to North Richland Hills, Texas To Whom it May Concern: This letter will serve as our request to have the utility easement located on a portion of the North property line of the above captioned property abandoned. ~tVe have enclosed a copy of the recorded Warranty Deed, a copy of the plat of the subdivision, and letters from the following: Texas Electric Service Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, lone Star Gas Canpany, and Blackhawk Cable Company terwill be greatly appreciated. please let me know. 'Zj 17----"1' c - ~".Þz~ Nancy . McIn re -'- @ Southwestern Bell Telephone HEB Engineering Unit 1901 Central Dr Rm 425 Bedford, Texas 76021 June 19, 1985 City of North Richland Hills, Texas Planning and Zoning Department 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Richland Oaks, Lot 4R Block 3, 5113 Pearl Drive Ci ty of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas Southwestern Bell Telephone Company agrees to abandon the five foot easement along the north property line of the lot captioned above. There are no telephone utilities now located in or planned in this easement. Any questions may be referred to J~y Clark on 267-6741. J~~~é~Sign) '- '--- Lone Star Gas Company K, N. WATKINS General Superintendent of Distribution FORT WORTH DIVISION OF DISTRIBUTION 100 W. Morningsid. Dr. . Fort Worth, T..ol 76110 June 19, 1985 Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Encroachment of 5' Public Utility Easement at 5113 Pearl Drive North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Ms. Calvert: Please be advised, by this letter, that Lone Star Gas Company offers no objection to the encroachment into the 5' public utility easement at 5113 Pearl Drive in the City of North Richland Hills. Lone Star Gas Company, presently, has no facilities within the said easement. If further information is required, please advise. Sincerely, ¿]:771~ J. M. SEALS Sectional Supervisor II Engineering Records Group bdm '--- CJ3S '-- Black Hawk Cable Communications Corp. 1664 Norwood Plaza Hurst. r....a'l 76054 (81l) 268·0911 Jerry H. McIntire 1321 Greenway Dr. Suite 250 Irving, Texas Dear Ms. McIntire: RE: The dedicated 5 foot by 100 foot easement ~long the north property line of lot 4R Block 3, Rich1and Oaks addition. CBS/Blackhawk Cable Communications Corp. has no objections to abandoning the subject easement on said lot. If you have any questions please call this office. Sincerely, ð~~·~ Carl Savage Plant Manager c'--- '- ~ TEXAS . ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY June 20, 1985 '-- Jerry H. McIntire 1321 Greenway Dr. Suite 250 Irving, Texas 75038 Dear Ms. McIntire: RE: The dedicated 5 foot by 100 foot easement along the north property line of lot 4R Block 3, Richland Oaks addition. Texas Electric Service Company has no objections to abandoning the subject easement on said lot. If you have any questions please call this office. Sincerely, /J~m, ~ Gaylon M. Hicks Senior Right-of-Way Agent '-- P.o. . BOX 9 7 0 . FOR TWO R T H, T E X A S 76 1 0 1 TEL E P H 0 N E ( 8 1 7) 336 -9 4 1 1 A DIVISION OF TEXAS UTiliTIES ELECTRIC COMPANY .- . - ,. .' - \- j'~ ... - }:. ~ , '- "- '- I.... L .. iI' _ l~t,.· 1:· ::)¡~.: : 'H'.' ) '.., ~\ d~~:. , ~...... :. ... . ..... "'-:¡¡ 'r " ~' . .j. ..... - '"- f f r ~ , I .'21 IS& I" v \~ ~ ..~ . '. ,... ..... II> , .~ . \ u ' . . . II> () .. t,. i . "~ · tr: g ð'· ,ç,.. .. \'''' /JI..OCK 2' . (t¡ '.... tAa ~ ; , ,'~"I)~" , IlJ ø...=" '"' U"¡Ç IV '. Ii: '. .,. ,'6' I~~' . . ':"," :"IJ'Ú~fIO' .... , \'~.. P.'" . ..... ...'i ~~.: o.a ""= t:. ...¡ \,\.. ~ i ~ : ';"~ ~ ~ ~; : '" . . '" .. ,.' JL' . " . . ! ~ '" ~ C). ~ OR/V£. vO ¡,ø. t .. JfRR.lf '-'~ . ~,tI'¿ç'" , ~, ...~ ~r~' _ .. . " ;IQ (/) -i i\) ~ ~ ~ M, ~i \ I. '. ~ .. 10'" f." "I... ",' ..'" <J. "" ... ~é )Q l ...·S· :C~S' ,. ..J~~' _ ,~, . d"~' IV 6n c: 10,J"" . Sø·,ç/t ilïq.-~-· ... \.) .. - ~ ... ;: '" tI\ ~ '. õ:t. .. () a. -,: ~ 0; ~ 'f.)' t ~ ~ ~~ .. '.. LO. ~ ~"!/,!, ~ !: . ..... )Q ~ .", ... v ~ - ~ ... .. .. , ~ H~ ~~ ~ "f,f,,~ 56'·"~W ç( I'; II a .. .. \ . 'It: . '~'" . :.~ ....' ~~. .~ '.: J..... ,. - ~ '~~'I"_.'" . j : . , i-"'Y fi'4 ~)-~ ,,)- ~O\y. to" ~ .. ... q ... '. ~ ~ ;¡ .. "'- f~ /. ... \ì\ ~ (b' ~ ~Æ' .. . ~ ~ ¡Q n· ..., '""I"" [}1 < ,.,.. r - , ,i ~ (/) » ~ (T' ¡zU)O '0- ~"O .....õ O ~;p p> ICO- -t 7' 0 , "'0 (J) " .. " ¥ ð"~".. , ofJI· ,COlJ/IITV Ro...ø p~OJ. NtíI. ~,?JI ~N ~.~i~ ~ ~ ~~' ~ ~ ~ 1\ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ 'co ,/ ~ ~ ~ S Ii ~. ~ . 0.; I ("eR S' 'i' '~â ~ , ( :Þ~ '_:J "1 .1Ii U .µ'R: '0 :; t() ~ õ' ~ 1°;J ~ ~it t :T~ C\ -. Irß ''''' n ,,- .' :! ~ It).. 0# !'::R iiõ '110 2; I_IX ;~~ :~ ~,. i< ¡¡;t ~~, t . . .t.... ,. t'. I ,\ . I __. . . i.. . ;. . ".; .' ; 1', .' . ~ \.. )" q, .. RESOLUTION NO. 85-15 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS A RESOLUTION ABANDONING AN EASEMENT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LOT 4R, BLOCK 3, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, finds that it presently owns a five foot by one hundred foot easement, previously dedicated for general utility use purposes, on property described. below; and Whereas, the City Council further finds that the City of North Richland Hills no longer needs, uses or anticipate& a need or use for such easement. Now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills that: I. The City of North Richland Hills shall, and does hereby, abandon all right, title or interest in and to that certain five foot by one hundred foot easement along the north property line of Lot 4R, Block 3 of the Richland Oaks Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, such easement having been previously granted and dedicated to the City of North Richland Hills by platting of said Richland Oaks Addition in Vol. 388-8, page 80, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. II. By passage and adoption of this Resolution it is the intent of the City of North Richland Hills to relinquish any and all claims to such easement or to any future use of such easement. This Resolution shall be filed with the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, as evidence of the "- abandonment of such easement by this City. ..... PASSED AND RESOLVED this day of , 1985 APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY \.....- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS J L L Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 7-8-85 Agenda Number: GN 85-66 -'Subject: Bank Depository' Request for Proposal The current bank depository contract expires September 30. 19.85. State laws require the City to initiate a biddinlproCIiJSs and ,select a bank as depos:ttoryof City funds. Another legal requirement of the State requiTes the City to send proposals to only local banks if there are two or more bankS TesidiD8 within the corporate City limits. Highlights of the REP The Request for proposa1.'iestructured to be a fair proposal for the City and Banking Institutions. However, ~". is a pro-city contract. It iei1eèisnedtomaximize every aspect of the depository relationship in favor of the Cityaad yèt compensate the bank 'for services rendered on a sèt fee S.trocture. Services requø.sted are outlined as follows: 1. Payment of services rendered by the bank' are ,considered separate from investtllent.services. ~ ~'- ¡ ~ Recommendation ~. ~ ~ ~( ~ 3. 2. Competitive rate on investments in Ce'ttiftcates.of Deposits compared to the TreasuryBtll Yield. If the ratas are lower than market, the City is establishing up front that they w1111ikely decide to invest directly in T-Bills or other legal investments. . 5. The use of Super Now Accounts for operatinl funds. Extentiou of a line of c.redit in the 8IIOt1'nt of $500,000 for short term purcnases such as Fire Department'equipment with rates quoted as percentage of prime rate. 4. It is the staff's recOlDll1endation tbat the RFP be approved and bids taken for the proposal depository agreement for fiscal years 1985/86 and 1986/87. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) NIA Operating Budget NI A Other~ ~~....___ Depa.rtment He'adSignature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Re,view Acct. Number N/A Suf11CI~nd8 Awllable . Finance Director Page 1 of "-- Lewis F. McLain, Jr. Administrative & Fiscal Consulting Services 2300 Highland Village Road, Suite 240 Lewiwük, Texas 75067 (214) 221-7591 July 1, 1985 l1r. Lee Maness, Finance Director City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.R, Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tx, 76118 INTRODUCTION '-- The following document is a request for proposal (RFP) for bank depository services to be approved by the City Council and to be sent to eligible banking institutions in the City of North Richland Hills. The current depository contract expires on September 30, 1985. State laws empower the City to initiate a bidding process and to select a bank which, in the sole opinion of the City Council, is the best overall proposal. The request for proposal is being sent only to banks within the corporate City's boundaries.. a legal requirement if there are two or more banks residing within the City. This is a format and a process which has been used and accepted by at least ten cities in the State of Texas and has received favorable response from over two dozen banks in regard to its completeness and its professional approach. It is structured to be a fair proposal, taking into consideration most of the safeguards and concerns of a majority of banks, However, it is a pro-city contract. By that I mean that it's goal is to maximize every aspect of the depository relationship in favor of the City of North Richland Hills, It is for that reason that this RFP needs the review and approval of the City Council and that authorization be given to the staff and consultant to proceed with the bidding process as outlined. HIGHLIGHTS One of the more significant aspects of this depository approach is that the City is not asking for any free services from the banking community. The banking services are viewed separately from the investment services. The City is offering to pay for any and all of the services provided by the bank based on defined rates, considered to be the cost of providing those services to the City. '-- The City then expects the banks to bid a competitive rate on investments in certificates of deposit, The bids are compared to a widely used market rate indicator, the treasury bill yield for similar maturities. If the rates "- are lower than market, the City is establishing up front that they will likely decide to invest directly in T-bills or any other legal investment, a prerogative provided by the State Legislature several years ago, In the event this investment path is selected, the City is asking the proposing banks to handle the placement of these investments on a fee basis. Texas law is very one-sided in favor of public funds having maximum protection. For instance, all of the bank accounts plus any investments in certificates of deposit must have an equal amount of securities held in safekeeping by a third party which is collateral put up by the depository bank, This RFP outlines the required trustee arrangement so that there will never be a circumstance when the City's funds are jeopardized, regardless of the financial condition of the depository bank. The RFP calls for SuperNow accounts, interest bearing accounts which are offered to individuals, sole proprietorships and governmental bodies, In essence these accounts were created to allow unlimited deposit and check writing privileges while providing a yield that originally was established to compete with the money market funds. Although the bank. rates are less competitive than when the SuperNow accounts first became eligible, -they are nevertheless comparable to a reasonably good market rate and allow for the City to be earning money on all funds at all times, - The RFP also includes a number of bidding and operating requirements which are designed to minimize confusion in the review process and to provide for a good relationship throughout the contract period. Almost all of these characteristics are welcomed by the banking community, Some of these features have actually been at the request of interested bankers during the bidding process over the past few years as this current RFP format has evolved. The tone of the RFP reveals that the City is mainly interested in being treated like a corporate customer, one who wants to have a good business relationship in which all parties can be pleased over the contract period. SUM1'1ARY This approach is the product of working with over ten cities and various banks in the State, The RFP is structured to make this a pro-city arrangement while being fair to the financial community. The bidding process can yield a superior contract when there is true competition within the banking community. This is not always easy to determine because of the multiple factors involved, However, the standards of measurement are published service fees from other banks and the market rates on investments as established by treasury bill yields. The support of the City Council is vital to the success of the bank depository bidding process, I look forward to the opportunity to explain this approach to the City Council and, subsequently, to meet with the bankers at a bidders conference. '--- Sincerely, ;j~.; llJJ'ó!~f Lewis F. ncLain,Jr. '- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT JULY, 1985 "-- '-- - TABLg QE QONTgtlT2 "-- I . Introduction . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 II, Calendar of Events ......, ,.. ,.. ... .....,..,.. ,.... 2 III, Criteria for Evaluation ",...."",., "..., ,....., 2 IV. Account Activi ties .,.,..,..,..."..""...."...,. 3 A, Number of Accounts .,...,..,.,...,.."......". 3 B, Services and Fees ,."..,.,....,.....""....,' 3 C, Other Services .....,.,.,...,.,..,.."..,....,. 4 D, Bank Statements ,.",.......,.,..,...,.""..,. 4 E, Method of Payment and Reporting.". .",., ,..., 4 F. Availability of Funds ..,.".,. ..,...,... ...... 4 G. SUPER NOW Rates ..",..,..",..,.......",..". 4 - V. Investment Activities.",..,."..., ,.,.,...... ,... 5 A. Securities Pledged ,..,.,..,.... .,..",.,.".,. 5 B, Reporting Requirements.......", .,...,.,...... 5 C, Safekeeping ",..,....,...,.....",."......... 5 D. Substi tutions .,....."...."...,..,...,....,., 5 E. Interest Rates Paid ....,...".,.' ,..,.,.., .". 6 F. Investible Funds ,.,..,.......,..""..,....... 7 G. Interest Rate Calculations...". ",..,...,. ,., 7 H. Direct Investment Alternative,."...,.,.,...., 7 VI, Overdrafts & Loan Provisions ",..".,......"...,. 8 VII. Other Stipulations ....,.."..".,...,...,.,..,.... 9 A, Regulation Notices .."" ...,.......' .".. .".. 9 B. Wire Transfers "."..."....,.,........,.,.,.. 9 C. Right To Cancel Contract ..."", .....,.,....,. 9 D. Right To Audit Records ", ..,.... ""...,....., 9 E. Financial Reports ,."",....",..,.,.....,.", 9 F. Term of the Agreement ".,.....,..,., ,...,..". 9 VIII. Bidding Instructions/Requirements.... .,."" .'".. 9 A. Date, Time, Location ".. ,.."... ,.,.,.. ....", 9 B, Responding To This Request .....,.",.....,..., 10 C. Additional Information ,. .,.,....".....,...... 10 D, Right To Reject Bids,.,....,...,....... "..." 10 E, Other Stipulations. .......,.."......, "...... 10 IX. Other Miscellaneous .., ."", ..,.,.,......,....".. 10 A. Periodic Review....,.., .,.,..,.....",........ 10 B. RFP and Resulting Contract,..,.".,.........,. 10 C. Bid Advertisement ..,....,.".....,..,..,....,. 10 D. Authority To Issue RFP . .."".",..,..,. ,..... 10 '-- X. Appendices.,.......,..,..,..,......,......,....... 12 I. IHTROJ;mQT'!Qtl "-- The City of North Richland Hills is seeking applications from eligible financial institutions to be the depository for public funds of the City. The contract period will be two years beginning October 1, 1985 and thereafter until the successor depository shall have been duly selected and qualified according to state laws, At the outset, the City wishes to communicate the primary objectives of the depository agreement, an important component of the overall treasury and debt management program of the City of North Richland Hills: o To seek a bank that is both capable of providing banking services and willing to be attentive to the City's money matters; o To maximize the total dollars earned by the City on invested monies in order to be prudent and effective custodians of the taxpayer's financial resources; o To maintain a good working relationship with the Depositor Bank; and - o To adequately compensate the Depositor Bank services provided and to allow a reasonable profit be earned. for to This Request for Proposal, or "RFP", is intended to serve as the bid form for the depository agreement. There are several blanks to fill in and questions to be answered. The depository agreement will be prepared based on the bidder's response to this RFP. All points outlined and materials requested should be incorporated into the bidder's reply to be considered for evaluation. Attachments will be appropriate in order to answer some of the enclosed questions. '-- To assist in the preparation of the RFP and in the review of the resulting proposals, the City has engaged Mr. Lewis F, McLain, Jr. to serve as an advisor. The depository review process will be coordinated by Mr. Lee Maness, Finance Director. The City desires to enter into a contract that will maximize the City's interests, yet will be viewed as a good agreement on behalf of the Bank. City staff and advisors will be happy to answer any questions pertaining to this RFP, 1 II, CALENDAR OF EVENTS --- - --- .......... TARGET DATE Jul. 08, 1985 DESCRIPTION OF EVENTS ---------- -- ---- Present RFP to City Council for approval. Jul. 12, 1985 Host a bidder's conference at 10:00 a.m, to review RFP approach and content. Jul. 13, 1985 Advertise bank depository notice in the newspaper, Aug. 02, 1985 Receive proposals from interested banks. 10:00 a.m. at City Hall. Aug. 12, 1985 Review recommendation with the City Council and award the contract, Oct. 01, 1985 New bank depository contract period begins. III. QRITERIA FOR EVAkUATION The City staff and advisors will review the submitted proposals very carefully, The recommendations will be based on the bid determined to be best on behalf of the City and the taxpayers. As an indication of what will be considered in the evaluation of the proposals, the following areas are listed: 0 0 0 0 0 '- Ability to perform the requested services. Agreement to points outlined in this RFP, Interest rates paid on time deposits. Cost of banking services. Financial stability of the bank, 2 IV. ACCQ1!NT AQTIYITIES '--- A. The City intends to establish the following bank accounts: ACCOUNT NAME TYPE Consolidated Account Payroll Imprest Fund Revenue Sharing Insurance Imprest Account SuperNow SuperNow Super Now SuperNow The Consolidated Account consists of all of the City's operating funds, capital improvement funds, and interest & sinking funds except for those previously established with other institutions by bond ordinance. The Payroll Imprest Account is a clearing account for payroll and is maintained at a low level. The Revenue Sharing Account is to separately account for Federal Revenue Sharing monies, The Insurance Imprest Account is a clearing account and is drafted monthly to cover disbursements for insurance claims, The City reserves the right to open or close any number or type of accounts throughout the period, if necessary. B. The services which should be made available to the City include but are not limited to the following: FEE CHARGED/ ESTIMATED PER 1!tllT YOL.!Jtl~ º~2QRl~TIOtl QE 2~RVICE l. _L_ Account Maintenance, 2, ------ --11.fLm~ Deposit Tickets, 3. ---------- _125LmQ.... Items Deposited. 4, ----------- 1J..1 O.Q/mo.... Items Paid, 5. --------- ~ºLmQ.... Return Items, 6. __1.2..1.ººº_ Printed Checks. 7. -------- _-ª.2LY.!:.... Wire Services. 8. ----------- __lLy.L.. Stop Payment Request. 9. ----------- __Y.§..§_ Coin Wrappers Furnished. 10. -------- ___1º__ Night Depository Bags 1l. ------------ lººº-LmQ.... Cancelled Checks Returned in Numerical Order, '-- 12, _1_ Safe Deposit Boxes -------------- (12 x 12 x 10) 3 ',-- C. D. E. ...... '-- last Fund the the for The by These are estimates that represent volumes for the year. The Consolidated Account and the Payroll Imprest will require continuous form checks that are run on computer. Check style and format will be specified by City of North Richland Hills. There will be no checks the Revenue Sharing and Insurance Imprest Account. transactions for these two accounts will be accomplished wire transfer or by internal transfer advice. Please specify any other services available to the City of North Richland Hills which may be thought to be beneficial or that may apply to the City, State all related fees, ~gRYICg Egg ------------ ----------------- --------- Bank statements should be rendered within 5 working after the close of the calendar month, The statement include deposits made on the last day of the period. accompanying checks must be arranged in numerical order. days must The The City intends to pay for all account services provided by the Bank as set forth in section IV-B, The method expected to be used for the payment of these services is the direct payment method, The City will require an account analysis each month which will clearly show volume counts, fees charged, and total price for servicing the account, The account analysis should also show average ledger balances, average uncollected funds, average collected balances, interest rates and the amount of interest paid. The City of North Richland Hills will require an analysis even if the Bank were to bid the services cost. Please submit a sample of the monthly analysis statement that will be provided to the North Richland Hills, account at no account City of F. The City desires to receive same day credit for all funds deposited by 12:00 Noon and drawn on a bank located in the City of North Richland Hills, and next day credit for all funds deposited by 4:00 p.m., The funds should be investible for any investment transactions that can be executed, If not invested, the funds should earn interest at whatever rate is being paid for SUPER NOW accounts, G. Please provide a detailed explanation of the Bank's policy and methodology used in the setting of rates paid on SUPER NOW accounts. Also, provide a schedule of all rates paid on SUPER NOW accounts since January 5, 1983. Specifically indicate if the rates are applied to ledger balances or collected balances. Indicate when the rates change and if they are based on a market rate such as T-Bill discount or yield rate. 4 '- v, INY~STtl~~T AQTIYITl~~ A, As security for the deposits of the City of North Richland Hills, the bank shall pledge to the City securities equal to the largest total balances the City of North Richland Hills maintains in the Bank. The securities comprising the pledge shall be valued at par or market, whichever is lower, The securities so pledged, the amounts thereof and the time for pledging same must satisfy the requirements of Article 2560 Tex, Rev. Civ, Stat. Ann. B. The Bank shall provide the City a report of securities pledged at the end of each month or at any time requested by the City Manager, the City Treasurer or a designated representative. This report should reflect the following information at the end of each month: Total pledged securities itemized by: o Name. o Type/Description. o Par Value. o Market Value at Month End. o Maturity Date. o Moody's or Standard & Poors Rating, C. The securities pledged shall be held in safekeeping by a separate and different bank other than the Depositor Bank. The original copy of all security receipts shall be filed with the Finance Director of the City of North Richland Hills. The City will reimburse the Depositor Bank for safekeeping charges, if any. Specify the safekeeping charges that will apply: Please submit a copy of the safekeeping agreement and the name of the Trustee Bank to be used in the event you are awarded the bank depository contract. The safekeeping agreement must clearly state that the Trustee is instructed to release the collateralized securities to the City if the City has determined that the Bank has failed to pay on any accounts, including matured investments in certificates of deposit, or the City has determined that the City's funds are in jeopardy for whatever reason including involuntary closure or change of ownership, and if the instructions for release have been formally requested by the City Council by ordinance or resolution. The Safekeeping Trustee Bank, Richland Hills. Agreement must have signatories the Depository Bank and the City from the of North '-- 5 D, Any substitutions of the securities or reductions in the total amount pledged may be made only by and with proper written authorization approved by the City Manager, the Finance Director, or a designated representative. The City must approve all securities pledged, In the case of a reduction, the Bank must provide in writing that collateral will be available when needed to meet normal City balance increases throughout the year, Any state or local government bonds pledged must have a rating of "Baa" or better by Moody's Investor Services. ',,-- E. Subject to government regulations, the following is a schedule of bids for single maturity time deposits or certificates of deposit to be completed by the proposing financial institutions: Certificates of ºªEosil - ~1ºº.1.ººº QI: mQ~ _tlATURITY_ ªAS~ ADJUSTMENTS TQ ªð~L__ 14 - 29 days * plus/minus basis points 30 - 59 days * plus/minus basis points ------- 60 - 89 days * plus/minus basis points ------ 90 - 119 days * plus/minus basis points ------- 120 149 days * plus/minus basis points 150 - 179 days * plus/minus basis points ------ 180 - 209 days * plus/minus basis points - ----- 210 - 239 days * plus/minus basis points ------ 240 - 269 days * plus/minus basis points ------ 270 - 299 days * plus/minus basis points ----- 300 - 329 days * plus/minus basis points ----- 330 - 365 days * plus/minus basis points ----- Over 365 days * plus/minus basis points ------- (strike one) * tlQl~ The base will be the Treasury Bill ~l§lg for the maturity closest to the desired certificate of deposit maturity date as published in the ~~ll ~1I:ªª1 JQ~rnªl for the preceding day of the investment transaction. In case of a publication error, the City will accept any corrections from the Bank if they are in writing with the source cited, The base specified have C.D. above. used in the bid cannot be changed from that above. The City may reject any bid that does not rates measured against T-Bill yields as prescribed '--- The bids will be evaluated by evenly weighting each investment bracket based on the ceiling, if any, proposed by the Bank in section F below, 6 "- F. Inv~ª1ible Eunds. In addition to the normal operating revenues deposited and the operating monies disbursed, this depository agreement will cover all investible proceeds from the issuance of construction bonds, as long as the rates bid for investments exceed the Treasury Bill yield for an investment of similar length. If the interest rates paid on C.D,'s are lower than the Treasury Bill yield for an investment of similar length, then the Direct Investment Alternative defined in section V-H may apply. This contract will not cover interest and sinking funds or debt reserve funds covered by separate paying agent agreements under eXisting and future bond covenants, Please state the maximum amount, if any, securities which the Bank is willing or able to collateralized investments and SuperNow accounts the contract period ____________________. of pledged commit for throughout G. Int~~es1 Calculations. Interest on all certificates of deposit shall be computed on an actual day basis, and the interest will be paid to the City of North Richland Hills on the last business day of the month or the maturity date, whichever is earlier. Payment will be made by crediting the bank account, The City Treasurer shall be notified by the Bank of the interest amount on or before the last day of the month. Interest calculations will include the first day in the investment period but will not include the day of maturity. H. ºireç1 Inves1men1 Alte~Dª1ive. The City of North Richland Hills desires a depository agreement which enables all investments to be in the form of certificates of deposit issued by the Bank. However, since the state law now allows the City to invest in direct debt securities of the U. S, Government, the City will possibly select this permissible alternative in the event the proposed C. D. rates are not greater than the yields for Treasury Bills, In the event the City elects to invest directly in T-Bills, or any other allowable government securities, the City may desire for the depository Bank to execute the order and effect the transaction, The City will desire for the Bank to show that at least three (3) telephone bids were taken and a summary provided showing rates, bidders, time of bid and any other information that will provide documentation of the bidding process which may be reviewed by the City's independent auditors. Should this alternative be selected, what charges, if any, would be made to the City's account? ',-- Proposed Fee _________________ 7 ...... '- If the City decides to invest directly in Treasury Bills or any other allowable security, the Depositor Bank will be allowed to match the yield on the investment yield at the time of each investment decision. VI, OVERQRAETS ~ ~ºAtl .eRºVISIºtl~ A, The City does not intend to have a net throughout the course of the contract, defined as a negative demand balance in collectively, not by individual account. overdraft position An overdraft is the City accounts Should an overdraft occur in the aggregate, the following stipulations shall apply: 1. The maximum number of days the overdraft will be allowed is 2, The maximum amount of the net overdraft to be allowed will be $______________ 3, The interest rate will be _____________ per annum computed on an actual day basis. In the event a check or checks shall be presented for payment on any account or accounts maintained by the City of North Richland Hills, where there shall be insufficient funds for the purpose of paying checks, then the Depository Bank agrees to promptly notify the Finance Director of the City of North Richland Hills, by telephone or other means, of the existence of the overdraft situation, and to provide the Finance Director a period not exceeding one business day to respond to such overdraft. B. The Bank agrees to loan funds to the City of North Richland Hills on a short term basis, if needed, for operational purposes and for capital expenditures only, The short-term loan amount that will be assumed for bid evaluation purposes is an eighty percent (80%) equipment loan of $500,000 set up on a five year payback schedule which must be rolled over at the end of the two year contract period. The payment period will be monthly. If the interest rate is stated as a percentage of prime, you must indicate how closely your bank's prime interest rate tracks the accepted New York prime rate which was 9.5% on July 1, 1985. What is the basis for computing the rate to be paid the Bank by the City of North Richland Hills is as indicated below: ",- ------------------------------ 8 "-- VII. OTHER ~TIPULATloN~ A. The successful bidder will notify the City in writing within ten (10) days of any changes in Federal or State regulations or laws that would thereafter affect the depository agreement. The Bank shall also notify the City of any services that become available to the City throughout the contract period. B. Notification of wire transfers shall be made within one hour of the transaction and a duplicate copy furnished to the City within twenty-four hours. C. That in the event it would be ruled illegal under the provisions of any Federal Statute or regulation for the Bank to pay interest in the manner outlined in this RFP, then the City expressly reserves the right and privilege to cancel the contract and to re-bid the depository services. D. The Bank's records relating to the City of North Richland Hill's accounts shall be open to review by either City staff members or City appointed independent auditors during normal business hours. ~ E. The proposing Bank should submit a copy of the last annual financial statements along with the last four FDIC call reports, F. The term of the contract period will be for two years beginning October 1, 1985, and ending September 30, 1987, or thereafter until a successor depository has been selected. VIII. BIººING 1!§TRUQTIQNSLREQ!JIREMENTS A. Sealed bids or proposals clearly marked "Depository Application" should be delivered to the following person by 10:00 am, August 4, 1985: \~ Ms. Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary City of North Richland Hills 7301 N,E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 tlQ ßIº ~ILL ßE REQEIYEº ðETER 1~00 ð.:..tL. 9 '- - A. B. The proposing Bank should use this RFP form as the OFFICIAL BID FORM to submit rates and to answer questions. Any alterations, changes or deletions to this RFP may be grounds for the City to disregard and reject the RFP and the bid. C. The City reserves the right to request additional information or to meet with representatives from proposing organizations to discuss points in the proposal before and after submission, any and all of which may be used in forming a recommendation. D. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. E. The Bidder states that it is a banking institution chartered under laws of the United States or of the State of Texas. The Bidder states that its banking house is locatèd in the city limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. IX. QïHgR tlISCELLAtlEOº~ The City of North Richland Hills shall require a review meeting at least once every six months to evaluate the working relationship between the City and the Depositor Bank, The objective will be to address any problems and to seek a responsible solution. B, The final appointment of a depository Bank will be made. by the North Richland Hills City Council, This request for proposal has been reviewed and approved by the City Council, The bidder may be required to enter into a contract which incorporates all of the obligatory points in this RFP. Otherwise, an ordinance will be adopted accepting the Bank's RFP as the OFFICIAL BID FORM with accompanying related shedules and materials called for in this RFP. C. D. "-- This being inside Hills, Request for Proposal has been duly advertised and is offered for consideration to financial institutions the corporate limits of the City of North Richland as permitted by state laws, Upon being awarded the contract, the Depositor Bank shall designate an individual to be the official contact person for all correspondence. The City of North Richland Hills shall do the same. The Bank shall be responsible for training and communicating the terms of this contract to Bank Employees. 10 ',--. This proposal is submitted by the following person duly authorized to act on behalf of the Bank: Officer's Name and Title (Please Print) ------ Officer's Signature ---------------------------- Name of Bank ------------------------------ Date ------------------------- Address and Telehone Number ","---- 11 '~ '-- \...... x , ~EPEt!IU CES A. Summary of Cash Balances, B. C, Summary of Investments. Schedule of Bond Issues 12 A. ~!JtltlðRX OF CASH BALAìjQ~~ '--- GENERAL FUND: DATE DEPOSITS CHECKS HIGH LOW ENDING AVERAGE ------ -------- ------ ---------- -------- --------- ------- 06-84 125 766 382,473 ( 8,141) 95,237 202,410 '-- 07-84 120 750 540,662 ( 74,632) 113,311 174,226 08-84 152 743 2,290,820 42,734 265,603 268,281 09-84 125 620 861,453 ( 36,387) 861,453 229,431 10-84 133 734 861,453 ( 74,655) 86,002 151,501 11-84 126 760 248,826 ( 75,200) 43,815 53,289 12-84 108 735 142,967 ( 61,685) 91,547 72,129 01-85 133 738 593,666 48,751 717,058 233,408 02-85 113 756 717,058 59,341 932,075 226,396 03-85 108 778 1,156,458 ( 16,536) 465,106 427,633 04-85 136 927 668,233 ( 39,297) 170,330 180,990 05-85 126 899 1,827,773 33,079) 154,086 355,392 -------- ------ TOTAL 1,505 9,206 -------- ------ --------- --------- --------- ------- AVERAGE 125 767 857,653 ( 16,886) 332,969 214,591 -------- ------ --------- -...;;..------- --------- ------- "- 13 "- B . ~ºtltlARX QE It!YE~It1EHI~ JºNE~ l~~i = MAY. 19~~ LENGTH OF MATURITY NUMBER HIGH LOW AVERAGE -------------- ------ ---------- ---------- ---------- 14 - 29 DAYS 27 375,000 150,000 233,519 30 - 59 DAYS 29 400,000 150,000 235,345 60 - 89 DAYS 12 350,000 150,000 225,000 90 - 119 DAYS 13 2,000,000 175,000 630,769 120 - 149 DAYS 11 500,000 150,000 295,455 150 - 179 DAYS 4 375,000 200,000 266,861 180 - 209 DAYS 14 1,000,000 200,000 320,714 OVER 210 DAYS 28 1,575,000 96,000 340,878 ------ ~ TOTAL 138 ------ --------- ------- ------- AVERAGE 821,875 158,875 317,318 --------- ------- ------- "- 14 "-. C. 2Q!:i.~ººL~ OF BONº ISSU~â THE FOLLOWING BOND ISSUES ARE ANTICIPATED SUBSEQUENT TO VOTER APPROVAL: 1985 - $5,000,000 - $8,500,000 1986 - $6,000,000 - $9,000,000 1987 - $5,000,000 - $6,000,000 ',- 15 L r L r'¡ l r ~ j ! , - I ~ ! í L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administrat:J;on .' . . 'Council Meeting Date: 7/8/85 Resolution 85~16·.Interchange Improvements4tad One';'Way Traffi.c':'-O#:.'.~j.C$. Road at Loop Agenda Number: GN 85-67 Grapevine Highway . '. . .. Subject: One of the most critiêâl issues facing the City of Northl:ichled Hills is solving the traffic congestion probleuíatthe Davis Boulevard/Grapevine Htghway/Bedford-Euless Road! Interstate 820/Airport ~tt section, and the City;Council has given top priority to working with the State . _. of Highways and Pub-licii2!t'ansportation to find a solution. The City Co i1. . the firm of DeShazo.$tarek & Tang, Inc. to assist tQ.e State Highway Dep n ._ ins the needed·intèrchange improvements, and reaction from the State Highway iala indicates that· the timetable for construction of the interchange hasbee¡):advancèd considerably by thi'àction. At this time, there isonè 1m~wn ~ëm.aining action that the City can take t~ further encourage an, early start on construction of the interchan¡.~and that is to assure the State Highway Department that tl). will cooperate in· r...oving a traffic impediment which is considered to be of hi& rity; that being the elimination of two-way traffic flow on the service road' 820 between Gt's: . è 1I1.ghway at a point just west of Booth Calloway Road.' gly, it is proPQtbat the attached resolution be adopted by which the City of; .'þ:þ Richland Hills commits to support the conversion of this service road to one';"way operation at such timeaathé fOllowing two events have occurred: . 1) Bids have been received on the first increment of .the interchange revision. 2) Reconstruction/of GlenviewDrive between Booth Calloway Road and the Grapevine Highway has been cømpletedand is in opet'ation. Recommendation: It is recommended that the attacheci1tesolution 85-16 be addpted. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) Operating Budget Other .... Finance Review Acct. Number' Sufficient- Funds Available - 1('I1I'~ Department Head 'Signature City ~anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM - . Finance Director ~ Page 1 of 1 '-- RES 0 L UTI 0 N 85- 16 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills (hereinafter "the Ci ty") has worked diligently for a number of years to cause major interchange improvements to be made to the intersection complex of IH 820~ SH 121, SH 26, and FM 1938 (hereinafter "Interchange") ¡ WHEREAS, the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation (hereinafter the "State"), through the actions of the Highway Commission and of Mr. J. R. Stone, District Engineer of Highway District No.2, have expressed keen interest in working with the City, other municipali ties and concerned ci tizens to redesign the Interchange so that the present and anticipated traffic congestion will be eliminated¡ WHEREAS, the State and the City are in agreement that all traffic movements in and around the Interchange must be closely studied and corrected no later than the completion and operation of the redesigned Interchange ¡ WHEREAS, the State has requested that the City agree to support and cause the frontage road traffic adj acent to and along the southwest portion of the Interchange to be oriented in a one-way southbound movement as opposed to a two-way movement by such time as the bids are received on the first increment of the Interchange revision¡ WHEREAS, the City agrees that said one-way movements are appropriate for the efficient and safe flow of traffic in and around the Interchange, but recognizes that said goal cannot be accomplished without great inconvenience to a large number of motorists prior to the completion of several maj or road improvement proj ects in the area immediately to the southwest of the Interchange¡ and WHEREAS, the State acknowledges and understands the need for the above mentioned road improvements to occur prior to the frontage road directional movements being changed¡ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, by the authority vested herein, do hereby recommit their support to work with the State and any and all other appropriate persons and entities to facilitate the redesign, construction, and operation of the northeast Loop 820 Interchange as quickly as possible, FURTHERMORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City supports the one- way southbound orientation of frontage road traffic adjacent to and ',-- -'- along the southwest portion of the Interchange by such time as the bids are received on the first increment of the Interchange revision and the Glenview Drive improvements in the area to the southwest of the Interchange have been completed and are in operation. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 8th day of July, 1985. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney ',-- -2- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Department: SUbject: Lease/Purchase of Fit'e Vehicles 'COuncil Meeting Date: 7-8-85 Agenda Number: PU 85-22 L L Municipal lease-purchasfngfinancing is becoming a.widely accepted financing technique: presant'ly. being used by ma1'1ý state, County, and 'municipal governments to acqtì1re'es8ential equipment withpu.t significant capital outlay in anyone fiscal year. A lease-purchase is vie"edaa an ,'accrual of equity in the equipment ,with .ach payÍaent to the point wherethe,mun1cipality owns the equipment after -~ l~st rental payment. The key characteristic that makes lease-purcha in¡ legal and exempt from Teferendum requirements is the fact that thetr&'Ø ,1'1 is structured in a way not to obligate the municipality to makepaY'lll8ì1ts for more than one fiacal year at a time. During the budgat proce.af9r fiscal year 1985-86. it' became apparent because of the ,:hveto ta..tJtat the City of North ,Richland Hills effective tax rate for Debt Service purposes would decline significantly from 14. 75~per $100.00 to approx1mately12.75¢ per $100.00 based onprelfminary numbers supplied by TAD..' 'By utilizing '~, - - " ", - '- -,' - ,-' - ( -, :",' i ; the lease-purchase arrangement and financing a fire pumper truck and aerial ladder trttekw1;tb a total budgeted cost'of.approximate1y $520,000 the fit'st yearfbumcing cost would be appToximate1y $75,000 and additional years Ýoulctbe approximately $132JOOOannu~lly. /' ""-, _'_I, i The impact on the'Effective Tax Rate for Debt Service purposes for 1985/86 would be 55/100 of. 1¢ or an effective rate of 13.3¢ with subsequent years funding requiring an estimated additi~nal 45/100 of 1¢. ' Recounnendation ~ ~ [ 1 I ~ I I l~, í 1 L It is the recomrìendat:1on that approval be granted to advertise for competitive bids for lease"'purchase financing of Fire Department equipment in the amount of $520,000 and approve the'èoneept of funding for fiscal year 1985/86. J Source of Funds: Bonds (GOJRev,) Operating' Budget --X-..... Oth~o, _' ~ '7J1 ~"".'...~ Dep8;rtment HeacfSfgnåture CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number NI A Sufffef ' Fun(lsAvaUabie . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 ..,'. "io CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS L L .... .'. 'Public Works Department: '. ,y: .. . .·:.;::¡!~t\~';;;,:~::' C~unclI M~etlng Date: .. 6-10-85";.",.: .. '. ,.e.".,!>;;"!.;,.,,,: "PW 85-l8 . '. Subject: ,~, ';:" ': : ,>" ,:'~::,' >:'-:"', -' Chapman Dr1.v8·Imptovements Bid Tabulation : "'~-~' \'-;';/ ,;' . ' L '. -,...... ',.. , . ., .~ . ,.'., '.' " ," .". .. " . ,',; ,'.;". " " ". ";:"'~,~~.'~.\>t:~}~~,r~~~,.":,~,, . :';:c'''",;,'",. " < . The bid tabulationa fO'J:>:i:!t.ip¡íÒ,a, \load, attached to the enllÞleu'a letter, were higher "" the original estimatê$,~UIJO;1nc1uded as an alternate bicl1tem was the widening of Holiday Lane. \.:'. r I L 1¿,,::2 .", APAC-Te~aa, Inc. ia tha low ~ on the job at 400 eaJ.....,.;:¡!ayJl which is probably Ó'" exce..ive time end they.IîàYe..u,. th....elve. plent¡r ot. t:!ole, to avoid the $500 a day .,' liquidated dam.ge.. Tha ...., -. atreet and draiu", 'C""_t which APAC has at this" ;'ié time include. the .treeea ÌII !>':th;RUls Addition. Evsn t . they have plenty of tiiae, ;,¡,~;. left on that job we are -:llla's barel.time keeping them on . job on a day-to-clay ba.is. ¡ , ""<'" ',-' ~'::-': i; -.- }~'-".'~,.;"" ',. ',. '. . " ...., . " ,. ,. .. ; . , " ."<'. " . .:"'.:, ,.'" '.' ..C", ....:...t...·.,~<>,;..".:.. .,.;,:;.../.:~?;:;.::..;.,:.~.;. If this biel is a';arded to~ÀP,AC...T. IDe." in .U probability the CitY Hanager andlor' my.elf wiU ait down anel'_ atanding with APAC tbat .they mu.t .tay on the jo when it is PO.sible to eI~,ao.. . ' .' . ""'::':;;'{"~:f~:/;::!,~~¡~~;;,~}~ Staff'. re~OIIIIIIendaUon is ~ the bid of APAC-Texaa,' IDi:. in the alDO"'!t of " $I, 592. 207 · 88 for rebu:Ucll"g !lpael enel the wielenina of Holiday Lane .ou th of 'ê Chapman Road and tha aU.....Uøn of ,fun4.' for both projects 'to 1nelude' engineering and right of way as summarized b~;~~~;, ;':~\,.\"'~~',~..:y;.., . " A summary of the original budget,and L L L L Chapman Road ,.,',~,/"-;:-" '", ~'';':, , . :::'.: ,:". "'", $ 125,360.75 d') . ~'.' 13,509.42 '., ~;' ::' , 1.054,277.83 ':,"",.'.., '" ' . ç -0- L L L L 1. Engineering 2. Right of Way 3. Construction 4. Utility Adjustment L . :, Holiday Lane , ~;'. , 1. 2. '~ :-,.: '/' , '. "0' C:. .},', ~.., ~ '", _ . -. , -~','". "-.' ~':~.~;.;~?<~':'J-,:';-:<;:': :'~./~ ." '.~, . ' ',..: '.- " ~,,"" "'} ":",~-. '::'::,:',':',,", ";.'~-,' , .' i:';:, ':,¿:i'';;; ~:i;::/:.,~:1,_¡,,:. ,~ >. ~- 'h-:~_', /::_:'" :ì-,:'~'; .- I . L ~,' ',.', .'-," -- -' ;' .::, -.- ,,/-,;;;" . , ,.,. '. , '-,', ,- ~ ~'>-.. ::,~> .<-:":- -- '->'~~-,'-' -:' l L I ~ L Source of Funds: ... , ~:~:II<;gO~~~~t Both ',' '... ¡~ qthar -. ~~o~Jt ~_ Ð.epa.rtment Haa~ SIgnature, . CtTY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . . , ¡ Proposed Funding Source The original budget as speC!if:1.cI by theCIP Committee on March 12, 1985 as above is not sufficient to èOver thecoBtract amounts plus engineering and way costs. described ?=,ight of \ Finance Review Seé Above ~ . Finance Dlreclo. PaQe 1 of 2 L L L l L [ L L L L [ L L L L l. Utility CIP unspecified" fund balance",::~, .::,d ;'::> "'. .. Total proposed allo~4tionl' '''';.. ",.0,. ".';: ""'~' . J-'V-'· ,". . -'+.",1 '", ',-."< '"".' ;~~~.~:¡~~~.' /(., 13-00-48-4200 13-00-48-6050 13-00-48-6150 09-00-76-6700 . . >,-.:..,.,:_': .,',-". '". /':': -' ......'.." 'J..- ". ,,:. ~ ,'1.. _'_. 13-00-55-4200 13-00-55-6150 ·,.;tk,$1',6~5 '7::ï~j~' '$ 15,000.00 ',,' 125,000.00 $140,000.00 Holida Lane ,. .[ ir~ èl L L ~ Recommenda tion : , It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Award a contract foréhaptNim' Road and Holiday 1;ane wideñing and improvements . to APAC Texas in, the 'aMOUnt of $1,592,207r.S8, and 2) Approve the funding rÞl1ocations described above. $1,775,462.40 CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS L, I ·Department: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , Subject: L Council Meeting Date: 7/8/85 Agenda Number: PAY 85-25 I I L ','.' This job is now lOO%comp¡.. " cl all final clean up 1S~One. ,The Public Works Department held up final 'pat until the contractoráât1.sf'1éd Davis Boulevard Baptist Churcho that their rear lØ:tW'a$.·,~1.aaed up. We nOW have ,II : letter from the Church stating they are satisifed With,theêle'anup. I L Recommendation:..", Approve the final paymeÐ.ttoGibþins Construction Co. in th. amount of $5,109.63. ¡ ~ ~~ r I ~ ¡ ~ ~ I 'Finance RevieW I Source 01 Funds: Acct. NIl",. .' U"'OD-49-fi15Q 1L æ:itl~gO~L ~~R SUlflClehtFun;~ I Depar;tment Head SlglIaIift . .,. ,:.. City Manager L CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM L .~~ {,:~:{~¡~y~l._ .;" " fr,:";:'" ,., . . Finance Director <' ',:,', _:~?;~~~'~1~~~;::~~':-' Page 1 of 1 ~ '"--, II KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas April 25, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-231, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PALOMAR DRIVE -, STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.4, FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.4, and Final, dated April 17,1985, made payable to Gibbins Construction Co., in the amount of $5,109.63, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of March 31, 1985. This project includes curb and gutter and paving reconstruction of Palomar Drive as required because of construction of the off-site storm drain in Palomar by Burk Collins in connection with the Nor'East Addition Development. Also included in this project is construction of a 12-inch water line as part of a future extension from Davis Blvd. to Lola Drive. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. A "Construction Project Status Report" is provided which accounts for differences in the original estimated quantities and actual as-built quantities. We would note that the total contractor earnings are $9,860.75 less than the Contract Amount based on contract unit prices and original estimated quantities. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $5,109.63, be made to Gibbins Construction Co. at 441 Haltom Road, Fort Worth, T~., 76117. In accordance with Section 3.2.11(a) of the Contract, the two (2) year term of maintenance will begin on this date, and therefore, will terminate on April 24,1987. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, and other equipment furnished and installed under this Contract. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures, along with 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METR0/267-3367 '- - City Council, cont. Palomar Drive Final April 25, 1985 ',-- failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures. (See p. 3.2.6) Although the total contract completion time of 100 calendar days was exceeded, the Contractor was delayed by weather and other problems in the area which were beyond his control, therefore, we do not recommend that liquidated damages be assessed. (See attached letters) We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. Rr~f!I' ~ RWA/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ,J IlilS CQEt E.QR Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works '..~ " - Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance GIBBINS CONSTRUCTION '-- Page 2 " - "- ,- City of J(órth Richland Hills~ Texas "'-J~\..- '" ~.....- -E-__._-. ,~ -I7\' ' " - ~ /"-" 1 May 23, 1985 REF: PWL-0025-85 Mr. Oscar Huston, Pastor Davis Boulevard Baptist Church S20l Davis Blvd. N. Richland Hills, TX 76118 .', . '. . :',: .~~..~~~- r~~~t~~~·):t·~;', .,-.' :'~!··:::I.~1j,+ "'~Þ~"j'r~~~~'Ì1i' ',;;(.' ~ . Dear Pastor Huston: As we discussed on the telephone a few days ago, I have told Gibbins Construction Company that they would not receive their final payment until the church is satisfied with the condition of their back lot. If Gibbins Construction Company did not make arrangements with the church to dump on your property, and you do not want the material there, then he will have to move it all out to your satisfaction. I am enclosing an extra copy of this letter with a statement on the bottom for the church to sign as soon as they are satisfied with Gibbins Construction Company taking care of the problem on your lot. Sincerely, Gene Riddle Director Public Works/Utilities ds encl. h-:27~fS' Date Davis Boulevard Baptist Church is now satisfied that Gibbins Construction Company has taken care of the material on our back lot to our satisfaction and we feel that he should be paid his final payment at this time. ~;,1/uJ;:; ~re" ."" 1811' 281-0041/1301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O, BOX 18609/NORTI-i RICHLAND HILLS, TX 1~118 Lb' L[ ..... .··...Department: SUbject: ~ ~ ! l ~ ! ~- ~ ~ ~. ì r~ r L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Calloway.Acref¡·Stl'eet 41\d Drainage Improvements Pay Estimate 18 Council Meeting Date: 7/8/85 Agenda Number: PAY 85-26 > ' ,-' ~': - - I ,', This project includes,arc1uun.Scr\J:lg8 and Cross Streets be:tween Glenview and Grapevine Highway. These streets are!QO%c:omplete except for finøtl clean up and about 10' of curb to be poured. This .is not a final payment. Recommendation: Approve the payment of.$102.228.32 to Gibbins Construction Company. Funding Source: 09-0Qr71";;6700 - $11.533.00 13-00;;.;23-6150 - 90.695.32 '~ / ( t).. Finance Review Acct. Numb(¡r ." See Above Sufficie ndaAvanable Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) OperatfngBudget Other. ~.'. .. .... .~............Q..................... -~ .....~ Department HeadSfgnature CITY COUNCIL ACTION/TEM Go/Uv . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 >' "(ß.>è·'" > · KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, I NC, CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas '---- July 2, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 8 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor IS Partial Pay Estimate No.8, dated July 1, 1985, made payable to Gibbins Construction Co., in the amount of $102,228.32, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of June 28, 1985. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd A. McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recömrnend that this payment, in amount of $102,228.32, be made to Gibbins Construction Co. at 441 Haltom Road, Fort Worth, TX, 76117. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month IS estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. &aufUJ.~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ll d Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works~ ID:iISC~EDa Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of~llf io~~ Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Gibbins Construction "'-- 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . ,817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367