The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1985-07-22 Agendas L· L L L- L L L L L ~L L 'L L L L I L. . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 22. 1985 - 6:30 .P.M. . <{ For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chamb~~s, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM i ! ACTION T~ 1. PZ 85-40 Consideration of Thoroughfare Plan (Agenda Item #8) 2. GN 85-69 Adoption of Flood Plan Management Criteria Ordinance No. 1252 (Agenda Item #21) 3. SO 85-10 Request for Billboard Sign Loop· 820 at St.Louis & Southwestern Railroad (Agenda Item #19) 4. PS 85-35 Request of AlanW. Hamm, Inc. for final plat of Briarwood Estates. . Section 6 (Located > south of Starnes Road and east of Douglas Lane) (Agenda Item 1/16) 5. Other Items I L I L- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 22. 1985 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting July 8, 1985 5. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by Asterisk (16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 & 26) 7. Presentation of B. Dalton Grant Check to Library 8. PZ 85-40 Consideration of Thoroughfare Plan 9. PZ 85-?8 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of D.S. Byrd to rezone Lot 3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, from C-2 Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos to C-2 Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos (Located on the north (or west) side of Grapevine Highway at Maplewood Drive) 10. Ordinance No. 1253 Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 11. PZ 85-61 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Bill J. Fenimore & J.V. Frank to rezone Tracts 2G5, 2G6 and 18A, Mahaly Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from R-3 (Single Family) to R-4-SD (Separate Ownership Duplex) (Located on north side of Harmonson Road and west of Rufe Snow Drive. ~ 12. Ordinance No. 1244 13. PZ 85-65 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of R & G Associates to rezone Tract lA, John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753, from R-7 MF (Multi-Family) to C-1 (Commercial) (Located on the south side of Watauga Road and east of Rufe Snow Drive) 14. Ordinance No. 1246 15. PZ 85-46 Zoning Application South of Shady Grove Road, West of Davis Boulevard Ordinance No. 1222 (Postponed at the June 10, 1985 Meeting) *16. PS 85-35 PLANNING & ZONING - Request of Alan W. Hamm, Inc. for final plat of Briarwood Estates, Section 6 (Located south of Starnes Road and east of Douglas Lane) Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *17. , PS 85-41 PLANNING & ZONING - Request of Marcus H. Roberson for final plat of Eden Meadow Estates (Located on the east side of Eden Road and the north side of the St. Louis & Southwestern Railroad) . *18. PS 85-42 PLANNING & ZONING - Request of The Cambridge Co. for replat of Lots 1R & 2R, Block 2, and Lots 4 & 5, Block 13, Snow Heights North Addition (Northwood Plaza Joint Venture) (Located on the north side of Loop 820 and east of Rufe Snow Drive) 19. SO 85-10 Request for Billboard Sign Loop 820 at St. Louis & Southwestern Railroad *20. GN 85-68 Stre~t Name Change - Linma Lane, Ordinance No. 1251 *21. GN 85-69 Adoption of Flood Plan Management Criteria, Ordinance No. 1252 *22. PAY 85-27 Miscellaneous Street & Drainage Improvements - Estimate #6 *23. PAY 85-28 Watauga Trunk Line Sanitary Sewer Construction - Estimate #1 *24. PAY 85-29 Street & Drainage Improvements on Harwood Road - Estimate #3 Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *25. PAY 85-30 Glenview Drive Street & Drainage Improvements - Estimate 113 , *26. PAY 85-31 Street Paving Improvements for Hightower Drive - Estimate 111 27. Citizen Presentation Mr. J. Richard Perkins Consulting Engineer Re: College Hills Addition Lot 5, Block B & C 28. Adjournment -- -- ., . . '.' r~ I City of J\8rth Richland Hills, Texas . "t July 19, 1985 ITEMS ADDED TO THE JULY 22, 1985 AGENDA *27A. Executive Session to Discuss Personnel, Land and/or Litigation 27B. PS 84-14 Consideration of Approval of College Hills Addition, Lot 5, Block B & C. (Also listed under citizen presentation) *Closed due to subject matter. / ( 18171 281-OCM.1n3O'1 N.E. LOOP 8201P.0. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS.TX 76118 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY' HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JULY 8, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. ~ 1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order July 8, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Jim Ramsey Staff : Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Gene Riddle Lee Maness Richard Royston Richard Albin Rex McEntire Marjorie Nash Don Bowen '"--'..' ""-- Press: Duward Bean Mark England Absent: Harold Newman Virginia Moody Jim Kenna CALL TO ORDER Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman ROLL CALL City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Public Works Director Finance Director Director of Planning City Engineer Attorney Planning & Zoning Member Planning & Zoning Member Northeast Chronicle Mid Cities Daily News Councilman Councilwoman Councilman 3. The invocation was given by Mayor Pro Tem Davis. INVOCATION 4. Councilwoman Hinkle moved. seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of June 24, 1985. Motion carried 4-0. 5. None CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 24, 1985 APPROVED REMOVAL OF ITEM (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 6. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 4-0. -- CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (24, 25, 26, 27, 29 & 30) APPROVED ~ 7. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing t~ speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. David Barfield, representing Hanson Properties, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield stated that this piece of property contained approximately five acres and was located at the southwest corner of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road, across from Nob Hill Addition. Mr. Barfield stated they felt there was a need for 0-1 zoning. Mr. Barfield stated the office they planned to build would resemble the houses in the subdivision. Mr. Barfield stated there would be a brick wall surrounding the property and brick streets leading into it. Councilman Ramsey stated that with the adoption of the proposed Thoroughfare Plan there would be a requirement for additional street right-of-way and more participation in street construction. Councilman Ramsey asked Mr. Barfield if that would be a problem. - ~ Mr. Barfield stated that he still had not gotten a price but it would be in the neighborhood of $100 per foot for participation on Precinct Line Road and $50 per foot for Amundson which he had agreed to pay. Mr. Barfield stated they had no problem with the additional right of way requirement. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 8. Mayor Pro rem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Ordinance No. 1241. Motion carried 4-0. 9. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Susan Riess, representing Roma Corp., appeared before the Council. Ms. Riess stated they planned to have a Tony Roma Restaurant at 8010 Bedford-Euless Road and wished to sell alcoholic beverages. Mayor Echols asked Ms. Riess in whose name the permit would be issued. -- Ms. Riess stated the permit would be in the name of Robert F. Murchison. July 8, 1985 Page 2 PZ 85-36 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING ~ REQUEST OF HANSON PROPERTIES TO REZONE TRACTS 3A1 & 3A2, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO 0-1 {OFFICE DISTRICT) (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AMUNDSON ROAD AND PRECINCT LINE ROAD) ORDINANCE NO. 1241 APPROVED PZ 85-60 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF ROMA CORPORATION TO REZONE LOT 3, BLOCK 2, COCHRAN ADDITION, FROM C-2 (COMMERCIAL) TO C-2-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (LOCATED AT 8010 BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD) Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. -- There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 10. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve Ordinance No. 1243 to be in the name of Robert F. Murchison and non-transferrable. Motion carried 4-0. 11. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Ms. Peggy Krussell appeared before the Council. Ms. Krussell stated their request was for a car wash to better serve the community. Ms. Krussell stated it would be self-service and fully enclosed. Ms. Krussell stated that the closest car wash to this proposed site was one block north of Loop 820 on Lewis Drive. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. '-- '~ There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 12. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1245. Motion carried 4-0. 13. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Bill Fenimore, 610 Allied Northeast National Bank, appeared before the Council. Mr. Fenimore stated they were asking for R-6-T zoning for the property located at the southeast corner of Glenview Drive and Dawn Drive. Mr. Fenimore stated the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended R-8 zoning but R-8 was not available at the time of his application. Mr. Fenimore stated that the lots would be 5500 square feet and the minimum unit would be 1350 square feet, more than the ordinance required. Mr. Fenimore stated the only request that he had in addition to granting this zoning was that the minimum side building line be reduced on corner lots from 20 feet to 15 feet. - Mayor Echols asked Mr. Fenimore why he wanted to reduce the lot sizes. July 8, 1985 Page 3 ORDINANCE NO. 1243 APPROVED PZ 85-64 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF CAMPUS HILLS JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 3A2, WILLIAM MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1010, FROM ITS PRESENT CLASSIFICATION OF C-l (COMMERCIAL) TO C-2 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND CHAPMAN ROAD) ORDINANCE NO. 1245 APPROVED PZ 85-66 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF BILL FENIMORE TO REZONE TRACTS 2Al, 2A2, 2A2B, 2A2A, 2A3, 2El, 2E2, & 2E3, M. LYNCH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 953, FROM R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY) TO R-6-T (TOWNHOUSES AND GARDEN HOMES DISTRICT) (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GLENVIEW DRIVE AND DAWN DRIVE) ~ Mr. Fenimore stated that in this type of zoning with a 20 foot building side yard requirement and a 6 foot easement on the other side, it would leave only 30 feet for the building, which would not be very attractive. Mayor Echols asked if this was brought up at the Planning and Zoning meeting. Mr. Fenimore stated no, because at that time with the R-6-T zoning he did not have that problem. Mayor Echols stated the suggestion from the Planning and Zoning Commission that he apply for R-8 zoning caused his problem. Mr. Fenimore replied that was correct. Mayor Echols stated that Mr. Royston and the Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission were present and might like to comment. Mr. Line stated that this might be a procedure question that the City Attorney needed to resolve as to whether or not the Council could grant a variance from the ordinance or if it should be considered by the Board of Adjustment. i-- -............. Councilman Ramsey called for point of order and stated that this particular zoning case was in his opinion not a real star in the city's crown and he thought it would be better to get on with the business at hand and not cloud the issue anymore. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 14. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1247, R-8 zoning and allow 15 foot side yard lines on corner lots. Motion carried 4-0. 15. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forwàrd. Jackie Fluitt with Stembridge & Associates, appeared before the Council. - Mr. Fluitt stated the purpose of this zoning change was so his client would be able to construct single family dwellings on this tract. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. July 8, 1985 Page 4 ORDINANCE NO. 1247 APPROVED PZ 85-67 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF CLIFFORD A. PEARSON TO REZONE TRACT lA, THOMAS SPROUSE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1399, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH S IDE OF BURSEY ROAD AND THE WEST SIDE OF DOUGLAS LANE) There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. '- 16. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 1248. Motion carried 4-0. 17. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. David Barfield, 6825 Precinct Line Rd., appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield stated this would be part of the Nob Hill Addition. Mr. Barfield stated the lots would be larger in size than what was required in R-1 zoning and the house size would be 3,000 to 5,000 square feet. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 18. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve Ordinance No. 1249. ,-. Motion carried 4-0. 19. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. David ~arfield, representing Roger and Joan Hanson, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield stated this tract consisted of approximately onè and one-half acres and that Mr. Hanson planned to retain the house. Mr. Barfield stated the reason he purchased this property was to try and get access from Nob Hill South to Nob Hill North. Mr. Barfield stated he was going to try and get two lots out of the property that would be left and they would meet the R-2 zoning. Mr. Barfield stated that he would ask for consideration from the Council duri~g the platting process because the lots would be odd shape and may need some special requests. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. -- There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. -- July 8, 1985 Page 5 ORDINANCE NO. 1248 APPROVED PZ 85-70 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF ROGER & JOAN HANSON TO REZONE LOT 4, BLOCK 1, MARTIN ADDITION, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED WEST OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD AND ADJACENT TO NOB HILL ADDITION) ORDINANCE NO. 1249 APPROVED PZ 85-71 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF ROGER & JO&~ HANSON TO REZONE TRACT 3Y AND PART OF TRACT 3U2, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED EAST OF CRANE ROAD AND ADJACENT TO NOB HILL SUBDIVISION) '- 20. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve Ordinance No. 1250. Motion carried 4-0. 21. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to grant the appeal hearing for August 26, 1985. Motion carried 4-0. 22. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to grant the appeal hearing for August 26, 1985. Motion carried 4-0. 23. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to reconsider GN 85-61. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Rick Tuggle appeared before the Council. - '- Mr. Tuggle stated he had constructed a house at 6700 North Park Drive with the entrance on Rufe Snow. Mr. Tuggle stated he did try to comply with the building codes and his plans showing the driveway cut onto Rufe Snow were approved by City Staff. Mr. Tuggle stated that not only would it be costly to change the driveway, but the house would be difficult to sell. Councilman Ramsey stated that he went by over the weekend and there were approximately 45 residential openings onto Rufe Snow and at least eight other openings had been approved in the last year. Councilman Ramsey stated he believed that if this had been caught at the right time it would not have caused Mr. Tuggle the dilemma. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve GN 85-61. Motion carried 4-0. *24. *25. -- July 8, 1984 Page 6 ORDINANCE NO. 1250 APPROVED PZ 85-68 REQUEST FOR APPEAL HEARING - EARL MCKINNEY, TRUSTEE GRANTED PZ 85-69 REQUEST FOR APPEAL HEARING - EARL MCKINNEY, TRUSTEE GRANTED GN 85-61 POSSIBLE RECONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST OF RICK TUGGLE FOR A DRIVEWAY OPENING ONTO RUFE SNOW DRIVE (DENIED AT THE JUNE 24, 1985 MEETING) APPROVED GN 85-65 REQUEST FOR EASEMENT RELEASE 5113 PEARL STREET, RESOLUTION NO. 85-15 APPROVED GN 85-66 BANK DEPOSITORY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL APPROVED *26. '- *27. 28. Mr. Line stated that Mayor Pro Tem Davis and Councilman Ramsey had met with the contractor and the contractor had given the city a letter reducing the number of days from 400 to 365 at no additional cost to the city. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the bid of APAC-Texas, Inc., to be completed in 365 days. Motion carried 4-0. *29. '- *30. 31. Dr. Tom Duer, 7312 Londonderry, appeared before the Council. Dr. Duer stated that Londonderry Addition was bounded by Bursey Road which had a bad construction problem and was also a death trap. Dr. Duer stated this was a potential problem for the new Senior Citizens Center which was located in the 7300 block of Bursey Rd. Dr. Duer stated therè was a very high upgrade and he knew the City was aware of it because they just put up 10 m.p.h. speed limit signs where the Senior Citizens Center was. Dr. Duer stated that cars were speeding and drag racing up and down Bursey Rd. Dr. Duer stated he was not against the Senior Citizens Center but felt a better location should be found. -- July 8, 1985 Page 7 GN 85-67 RESOLUTION NO. 85-16, INTER- CHANGE IMPROVEMENTS AND ONE-WAY TRAFFIC ON SERVICE ROAD AT LOOP 820 AND GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY APPROVED J:.1U 85-22 LEASE/PURCHASE OF FIRE VEHICLES APPROVED PW 85-18 CHAPMAN DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS BID TABULATION (POSTPONED AT THE JUNE 24, 1985 MEETING) PAY 85-25 PALOMAR DRIVE STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, PAY ESTIMATE #4 AND FINAL APPROVED PAY 85-26 CALLOWAY ACRES STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, PAY ESTIMATE 118 APPROVED CITIZEN PRESENTATION July 8, 1985 Page 8 '-- Mayor Echols stated an effort had been made to control the speed.and was Dr. Duer suggesting some other type of control. Dr. Duer stated yes, and if not some type of control over the speed, then the center should be moved. Councilman Ramsey stated that it seemed that since the decision was made to have a Senior Citizens Center in North Richland Hills, the City had received nothing but criticism about it and the criticism was respected. Councilman Ramsey stated that maybe some things were overlooked, but keep in mind the city's enthusiasm at the opportunity to do something for the senior citizens when the City did not have the money or total authority to do it right. Dr. Duer stated he was not against the Senior Citizens Center, his problem was the location. Ms. Linda Wycrhause, 7308 Bursey Rd., appeared before the Council. Ms. Wycrhause expressed concerned about the traffic and condition of Bursey Road and felt that a 10 m.p.h. speed limit did not help. -- .......... Councilman Ramsey asked that the staff look into the situation and report back in two weeks. 32. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to adjourn. ADJOURNMENT Mayor ATTEST: . City Secretary - L' L í I L L L L L I L L L L L L L L L L -- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development At its meeting of June 10. 19&,5~t)eC:lty Council reviewe~abdconsidered the proposed ThorQ,11ghfarePlanof ~eC$ty. ··.'the . version of theplanlfhich was under consideration was t.Þe latest recommendationC>fthePlanning and Zonin¡Commission including several suggested revisions wb:fchlUade.eòutof the hearings bef'ore the Commission. At the City Council hearing several citizens appeared to speak abOut various aspects of the plan. . At the close of the City Council hearing the Council directed the plan be returned to the Planning and Zonina Cømid:s..:fon for consideration of seven specific items prior to final adoption of the plan.' theitè1ns involved were as fo11ows: Subject: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 7/22/85 Proposed Thoroughfe.rePlan .Counþil Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PZ 85-40 C4U designation arid replace with C2U Vance Road Remove C4U designation and replace with C2U Holiday Lane ~WSTION:. Is M4U des:L...tion appropriate in areas ..mer.edevelopment restric,ts¡right of way and ability to widen . paving· to ultimate··48 foot width? Starnes Road QUESTION: ShouldStarnesRôad be reduced to C2U des1þation betweenl.ufeSnow and Davis Boulevard since a significant percenta,e of the area is fully developed? East of Davis BoUlevard development is not advanced and M4U can beaccamplished. Show alignment at MårtfnRôad to eliminate route tbrou,gh Roseberry and Botthamproperties. Every streetnot~d'pn''1'ñ()roughfare Map should oespecifically labeled, such as North RichlandBoulevard. Crane Road - Include in the text of the document and/or on the face of the map a statement: "If pbys~cal development restraints occur. the City Council's intent is not to di.plaee Homeowners." The Planning and ZoningCQmmissionopened the discussion of the Thoroughfare Plan to a public hearing and severalcit$z.ens.spoke relating to the items of concern from the City Council as well as generalcOlØllta11tS"bö'Utthe pH.n. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) f;2grerating BUd~get _. ~ ~ø.d-~ ..( - é.;part ;1;~ÌllU\lure I City Managar CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM L l Finance Review Acct. Number. Sufficient Funds AvaUable . Finance Dlrec,or Page 1 of 2 L" L LL I I.... L ¡ L L L I L r :L,-. L L L L L L L L- L The Planning and Zoninge~.....tØ1).1!Ì8a1n1:f!commendedtøtheCity Council .that the Thoroughfare Plan for the C:l.t}' <be adopted with the following comments: (1) (2) H( 3 ) '" Susan Lee Lane be redu'ced to C2U. Vance Road be reduced to C2U. Holiday Lane should 1:ema:l.n an M4U designation.north of Loop 820. The Commission cOlll1Ìented 'that several citizens mentioned rerouting of Holiday in the area of the College Hill Subdiv:l.sion. ThéCOIIJ1I118s:l.on suggested that the Staff considef ~yfeal!l:ible alternatives to. the current alignment in working with developers In· the area. (4) Starnes Road should rema:l.n an M4U des:l.gnation.·· Any improvements undertaken in developed areas should be des:l.gned t01liin:l.1I1ize :l.mpact on existing properties. (5) Crane Road shoul~ be reduced to a C2U designation from Amundson Road south to Mart:l.n Drive. Thesect:l.on from Martin Drive to Watauga Road be eliminated and the C4U designation be retained from \latauga Road south. (6) The streets will btt labeled. (7) Although the stated intent of C:l.ty Counc:l.l policy is appropriate, placing the statement on the map 1Ii&ht limit future Councils in their efforts to implement various areas of the Thoroughfare Plan. - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '\ I Page 6 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 ( ( '- Mr. Byrd said the lighting would shin on the cars, not the neighborhood. Mr. Schwinger asked if would be brighter than Mr. Byrd Chairman Bowen sa the City Ordinance requires the Ii ting be kept within their boundar . Chairman owen called for those wishi to speak in opposition. to this req st to please come forward. 8. ',,- PS 85-47 APPROVED 9. PZ 85-40 here being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-58 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-58 and lift the restrictions of lights and business hours. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Wood voting against. -- Consideration of changing the name of the street, Linma Lane, to Daytona Drive. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-47. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Consideration of proposed Thoroughfare Plan. Chairman Bowen said the City Council has requested the Commission review the following areas: 1. Susan Lee Lane-Change from C4U to C2U. 2. Vance Road-Change from C4U to C2U. 3. Holiday Lane-Question: Is M4U appropriate in areas where development restricts R.O.W. and ability to widen paving to 48 ft. ...... Page 7 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 '- -- -- -- ( ( 4. Starnes Road-Question: Should it be reduced to C2U between Rufe Snow & Davis Blvd. since so much of the area is already developed. East of Davis is not developed and C4U can be accomplished.' 5. Crane Road-Show realignment at Martin Road & eliminate route through Roseberry & Bonham property. 6. Every street on map should be specifically labeled. 7. Include in the document and/or on the map a statement: "if physical development restraints occur, the City Council's intent is not to displace homeowners." Walter Couch, 6064 Holiday Lane, came forward. He said if they widen Holiday Lane to 48 feet, it will cut into his property line and will devalue his property. He also stated the city has not looked at all alternatives and he is against this. Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Couch if he was asking that Holiday Lane be realigned. Mr. Couch said he was. He requested it be realigned to go on the west side of the drainage channel. Mr. Tucker stated they could change the alignment. Alan Levie, 6060 Holiday Lane, came forward. He said he was a neighbor to Mr. Couch and they live on "suicide lane". He said he has 4 teenagers and 7 autos. Mr. Levie said they can not park at the curb because they have had accidents. He said all his cars are running and inspected. Mr. Levie said there was a drainage problem at Bogart and Holiday Lane. He said there are also lots of children in the area. -- Page 8 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 '- -- - ( ( Mr. Levie said coming out of the intersections, one can not see around the brick barriers (or fences). He also felt the widening of Holiday Lane would devalue his property. Pat Bradberry, 7320 Spurgeon Court, came forward. He stated he had bought his new house 4 months ago. He requested the Commission look at the change in the street that Mr. Couch recommended. Bill Williams, 7437 North Richland Blvd., came forward. He said he lives on the corner of Holiday Lane and North Richland Blvd. Mr. Williams said the City Council stated that North Richland Blvd., Lola, and Susan Lee Lane would be C2U. Mr. Royston stated they would be C2U. Mr. Williams stated if they take 4 feet off his property, his pickup would stick out into the street. He requested they consider the realignment that was submitted along the west side of the creek. Mr. Williams stated traffic would be worse if the street were widen. He said M4U allows a speed limit of 45 miles per hour, now it is 30 MPH. Mr. Williams stated it would devalue his property to widen the street. Dan Anderson, 7201 Lola, came forward. He said there has to be something done with the traffic, but at the corner of Lola and Holiday Lane, there will be no off-street parking on either street and if they widen the street, his car would be out in the street. Mr. Anderson said he felt they were going to compound traffic by adding more. He said the city should buy up the houses in the southern portion of Holiday Lane and put in a park. Page 9 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 '- ~-- - ( ( Mr. Anderson said he would not be able to get fair market value for his property. Lee Bonham, 8920 Martin Drive, came forward. He stated that if 'Crane Road goes through as planned, he would get run over in his bedroom. Mr. Tucker showed Mr. Bonham and Mr. Roseberry the change made in Crane Road. They were pleased. Tony Whitworth, Susan Lee Lane, asked what C2U was. Mr. Royston said it was a local collector street and there are no specific plans for widening Susan Lee. R. P. Vinal, 6816 Meadow Road, came forward. He said he heard that Meadow Road was soon to be Holiday Lane. He said he had lived here since 1968 and this is the first he had heard if it. Mr. Vinal said if you take a straight shot from Starnes Road, it would be worse than the Daytona Speedway. He asked when this would happen. Chairman Bowen stated this is a plan for the future to get the traffic through and the city does not have a time table as to when it will be done. Mr. Tucker said it probably would be a bond issue. Mr. Royston said the city is proposing a bond package and asking for input from the citizens regarding $100,000,000 in needs. Chairman Bowen said Holiday Lane would be an M4U, 48 feet curb to curb. He said it changes at Starnes Road to a C2 and ends at Bursey Road. Page 10 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 .,,-- -- -- - ( ( Erick Hill, Precinct Line Road, came forward. He asked what was new on Precinct Line Road. Chairman Bowen said the Thoroughfare Plan shows for it to be a 6 'lane divided road. Mr. Royston said it would be a cooperative effort from the adjoining cities for right-of-way. He said they would like to interest the State in building it from Grapevine Highway to Shady Grove Road. Mr. Hill stated the road was already carrying 6 lanes of traffic now. He said traffic is terrible and he is looking forward to it being widened. Gloria Anderson, 7201 Lola, came forward. She said the school board and citizens wanted the overpass at Holiday Lane and 820, she did not think it was the state. Mrs. Anderson said 8 feet could be taken off the school property. Chairman Bowen said that would be looked into. Mrs. Anderson asked that they be given time to sell their house. Robert Morris, Starnes Road, came forward. He asked what size Starnes Road was. Mr. Tucker said it would be an M4U. Mr. Morris said he thought the City Council talked of changing it. Mr. Royston said the 4 lanes can be squeezed in there without more right-of-way. He said it is already 41 feet and would only need 7 feet more. Page 11 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 "- - PZ 85-40 APPROVED ( ( Mr. Morris said there are already several east-west streets and he is against widening Starnes Road. Marilyn Miller, 5124 Holiday Lane, came forward. She asked why they didn't take 8 feet off the school property. Mr. Tucker said the Planning and Zoning Commission does not have that authority. He said they recommend how to take care of the traffic, but where the money comes from is the City Council's responsibility. Ms. Miller asked how much right-of-way is needed for a 48 foot street. Mr. Royston said the goal is for a 70 foot right-of-way with 48 foot of pavement. Bob Grant, 6809 Meadow Road, came forward. He asked to see the route Holiday Lane would go. Mr. Grant said Meadow Road would be good for improvement, but would cost a lot of money. Dennis Horton, 6032 Holiday Lane, said he wanted to voice his objection to the widening of Holiday Lane. He said Mr. Williams stated all his objections. Mr. Horton said he has a pretty bad incline and it is very difficult to park in the street. He said he would be in favor of running Holiday Lane west of the drainage channel. Mr. Tucker made the motion to: 1. Agree. 2. Agree. 3. Yes, M4U is correct, but would like to consider a realignment. 4. Starnes Road should remain C4U. 5. Crane Road-stop at Martin Drive and realign & downgrade to C2U. 6. Agree. 7. It is always a City Council policy. -- Page 12 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 ( ( '- This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:15 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission -- '- ( ( ~ Mayor Echols advised that Councilman Ra Item #33 removed e e would me ue to a prior engagement. e that have to leave the 1 6A. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to send the Thoroughfare Plan, with amendments, back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. . ,.. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that since many concerned citizens had contacted the Council he felt it necessary to make the following statements. The first matter that came to attention was Susan Lee Lane which is shown as C4U had been changed to C2U, collector type street. Vance Road was shown as a C4U and is recommended to be a C2U. There would not be any houses torn down on Holiday Lane to make it a four lane street. There were some undeveloped portions of Holiday Lane that needed to be widened, particularly south of Chapman in the new Fox Hollow Addition, and between Chapman and the railroad tract and as it goes further north into undeveloped areas Holiday Lane may be widened to meet the criteria of M4U. There was no way Holiday Lane could be widened around Richland High School and along Holiday West Addition because homes were there. Holiday Lane needed to be widened as much as possible, however the City was not in the habit of tearing down houses to put new streets in. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Starnes Road was another concern of the citizens. There were some developed areas on Starnes that were not going to change, but there were also some undeveloped areas on Starnes Road east of the Stoneybrook Addition, where the street could be widened. There was no way Starnes· Road could be widened where it was already developed and it should stay an C2U. f ~ Mr. Richard Boykin, 7605 North Richland Boulevard, appeared before the Council. Mr. Boykin stated that he had been informed that North Richland Boulevard would be widened. Mayor Echols stated North Richland Boulevard was not on the plan to be widened. Mr. Dan Anderson, 7201 Lola, appeared before the Council. Mr. Anderson asked what was meant by Holiday Lane being widened as permitted to M4U and if so how is it going to affect the traffic where it is not a M4U? Mr. Anderson stated it would be a bigger mess around the high school than it was presently. I Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he felt all would agree that if Holiday Lane from Loop 820 to Lewis Lane was wider it would be beneficial but the easiest route is to take the additional right-of-way from the high school property. Mayor Pro Tem L June 10, 1985 Page 2 PZ 85-40 REVISED THOROUGHFARE PLAN ( ( ..- Mr. Cato asked what the City policy would be on the implementation of' the Thoroughfare Plan pertaining to new development or new zoning. T Mr. Line stated that if it had to do with undeveloped property, the Thoroughfare Plan would be a guide to the Planning and Zoning Commission in terms of determining right-of-way widths to be dedicated for street purposes and construction standards to be adhered to by developers. Mr. Robert Taylor, 4724 Mackey, appeared before the Council. Mr. Taylor asked what the designation for Redondo was. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it was a residential street. Mr. Jack Roseberry, 8912 Martin, appeared before the Council. Mr. Roseberry expressed his appreciation to the Staff and Council who had worked long hours on this plan for the City. Mr. Roseberry stated he still had concerns on the route of Crane Road. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. f Mayor Pro Tem Davis amended the motion to send the Thoroughfare Plan back to Planning and Zoning with the following amendments: Susan Lee Lane designated as C2Uj Starnes Road west of Davis C2U and east of Davis M4Uj Holiday Lane north of Loop 820 M4U (consideration to be given to physical restraints as it is not the City's intention to displace people). _ "'c.. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Echols called a recess. Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order, the same Council and Staff present as recorded in the roll call ex~ept Councilman Ramsey, who left the meeting. 7. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing following information: / '--I This Zoning Application is presented the restaurant lot located on the south side of Bed -Euless Road east of Grapevine Highway. The req ed rezoning is from C-l Commercial to C-l Comme al - Specific Use - Sale of Alcoholic Beverages he applicants are completing the renovation of restaurant at this location known as "Senor Cho s" and they wish to sell alcoholic beverages with service. called for anyone 'wishing to speak in favor of to please come forward. June 10, 1985 Page 6 RECESS PZ 85-39 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST OF SENOR CHICK'S OF TARRANT COUNTY TO REZONE LOT 3, KIP'S BIG BOY ADDITION FROM C-l (COMMERCIAL) TO C-l - SPECIFIC USE - SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (LOCATED AT 7762 BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD) '-- r- '1 - J -- - - ( ( 29. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1231. Motion carried 5-0. 30. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve Ordinance No. 1232. Motion carried 5-0. 31. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, approve Ordinance No. 1233 Motion carried 5-0. b Councilwoman Hinkle, to eletion of 9A.6B. 32. Mayor Echols presente the following information: This proposed Zoni g Ordinance revision modifies the number and size df park' g spaces required for disabled parking. In reviewing tþ requirements of the Ordinance in relation to the adopt State of Texas guidelines, the Staff discovered the City's equirements were significantly more stringent both in the nu er of spaces required and the size and location of those s ces. The proposed revision would bring the City's requi ments into conformance with the state guidelines. cilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, approve Ordinance No. 1228. Motion carried 5-0. 33. Moved to item #6A. 34. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forwar~. ----- June 10, 1985 Page 13 PZ 85-53 ORDIN NO. 1231 - AM DMEN1 TO ORDINANC NO. 10E - ZONING INANCE T ADD THE PLICATION OF PL L ED DEVE PMENT CONTROLS TO HE COMÞfERCIAL D STRICTS ~PROVED PZ 85-54 ORDINANCE NO. 1232 - AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 108 - ZONING ORDINANCE T ADD SECTION 14.3.13 TO ALLOW THE ADDITIO: OF AN APARTMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SELF-STORAGE OR MINI-WAREHOUSE PROJECT APPROVED PZ 85-55 ORDINANCE NO. 1233 - AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 108C - ZONING ORDINANCE TC ADD SECTION 9A - ZERC LOT-LINE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSES PZ 85-57 ORDINANCE NO. 1228 - AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 1080 - ZONING ORDINANCE TO MODIFY THE NUÞffiER AND SIZE OF PARKING SPACES FOR THE DISABLED PZ 85-40 REVISED THOROUGHFARE PLAN POSTPONED PUBLIC HEARING - COÞœREHENSIVE PLAN ( ( r- Mayor Echols statéd the City had the write-up on the Master Plan proposal which was the rationale for the Master Plan and there was' some essential elements to the Plan. Mayor Echols stated this narrative was one of them, others were the Master Drainage Plan, the Master Thoroughfare Plan and the Master Land Use Plan. Mayor Echols stated the Master Drainage Plan had already been approved. The Narrative Plan will be sent back to Planning and Zoning for further consideration and then submitted to the Council for approval. 1 There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher to send the Comprehensive narrative back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 5-0. 35. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the request for an appeal hearing, to be heard July 8, 1985. Motion carried 5-0. f *36. _""'<.... *37. 1 ....., June 10, 1985 Page 14 REQUEST FOR AE AL HEARING - P 85-42- . JOINT PS 85-25 PLANNING & ZONING - REQUEST OF R. W. WRIGHT FOR SHORT FORM PLAT OF LOT 5, BLOCK 7, BRIARWOOD ESTATES, 2ND FILING (LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HEWITT LANE AND POST OAK DRIVE) APPROVED PS 85-26 PLANNING & ZONING - REQUEST OF JAMES W. BROCK FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 7R & 15R, BLOCK 1, PARKRIDGE ESTATES APPROVED r ..... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS L Department: Planning and Ðe¥e.1öpme.nt Council Meeting Date: 7/22/85 ¡ L Subject: Zoning Applièã~~on Grape¥ine Highway At: Màplewood Agenda Number: PZ 85-58 ¡ L This zoning applicationls,·pt'åsented on the commercialtt.'~(:J: located on the north (or west) side of Grape¥ine~!,IiWåy,..~.1otaPlewood Avenue. The·ret.l~ested rezoning is from C-2 SU Covnnercial Specific-UseSaleø~tJ8ed Autos to C-2SU Commeroial Sale of Used Autos. The applicant wishes tOJ';etainth.Specific Use Permit. . However he requested t1)at the Commission and City Cøuncil.re...cons1der the specific contra!s teq~ired under the original approval. L L L L L L The stipulations listed On lí:beprt!¥ious. approval which .theapplicant requests re-consideration are: (1) No outdoor lighting (2) No cars more thantwó ,.e~rs old (3) Business hours 8A.M.toS P.M. The applicant appeared at the hearinÎ and stated that he could accept the stipulation regarding the age of the autos. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Commission rec~endedthat Zoning' Application PZ 85-58 beapprt)V .. . .'ntttbat the stipulations regarding the lighting of the lot and the hoursoføperatiô1tberemoved. ¡ ! i.- L ! 1¡. Source of Funds: 1 Bonds (GO/Rev.) ¿;Z:BUdge~ Q er ~ [ ~ ~ 57 '/:if/. ~. 1 DepeÌtme ::d~lgnature~. Olty Manager . CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance· Review \ Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Fin/ilnce Dlrec'or \ '- Page 1 of 1 '- "- \...... d '~~~~~~ ~~~ =c1ffÇ \~~r~¡ +:': "::':i1fft ~ r /::it- ¡,~t ~ ~ ~ý "'->-;::. ]J!;f:-::DI ¡¡", I II II ] I '-...- ~ ~H- ;.... ~\ ::";;¡~7 . 'A. , ~ I, W ,TT ¡ ·8:.6-111: E!it .~ If('T ~V¡ C-¡. +11 I l" 'T II II, ! ~: ,J;û ~~~~~ .R'I-~ ~ ....... ~l Tn, ~_ I I! IT, 1 ~~' ~ ;.-~ ,~........~ ¡:~.* ~- I T' I .R:.l!wf 1 'C) '<. ~ R ~I V-- ......~r- I ¡ ì : ~r I I I I _ ' , Hil ~ ~~ ~~J Hr _ _ I.i....i../ DS3 v c. r.T.ou........__ , If m1l'::¡ >->-" · R 7 MF . dt=!=r Vr' ~'7-'M1. F .- == i- ' I II iH' ~'¡.IJ: ... ~--I~ !. '. ¡ s. - ¡.. R-3 : ~ / ~.y"" I I I I"'~ ~n.¡ :"FC: r.....~~......... F.p. Co, I ~ - - . ~ . }.Rs.... ..........:............... ~r'- ,_~~~....-ç: ~ n- /" _,0." ~...~ ........, '''. .----::.---- , ;:;,:A~~~-'V y ~ --I .. .. R ....... / , -~¿ ~-- ~ I I r/ r I I TIT 1/ ' , J......"y X . I , ~"Y ~.....x -\\,; ~ -.--. ¡.¡ T , I \ \.YV~ t'\o'~~....-\ ~¡;-, ~"-,II . ~ ' , R-2 \ ~ ,~~, .- f'J- f- 7f\ R-7-MF \ F. P. I ¡\ i \' :::\ Y\=-\ m w.. t:::I"1 I- ~ 'I Il.....J ~ ¡- '''~u 1=3JR-7-MF = _ ~,---- T:TTT II r í .r- I F=a.1 ~J~"'", ' "\: ($ ~ 1. 1.1- TI .. þ::RR-S-T R~~;T =: -t \ r-\' L~""""'. \~ Y... '\ ~ T :- HOLlDAT ¡;r C 2 I "':J'--..""E3I!I _ J V~I._~, ~:..., ~:: HI'GHTI š.J.'~ ~ : _ _ t:f T " "LJ 1-". ~ . _ ~If ' , ¡ ¡---¡: +-1 µ ';- I '- lUll. ì ,. -7, ,.... I i..l~ I- ~_ I I~ ij., ¡I, '. [ :~I- Rl ,p I- :: C-~ I I~; '" J I I T I I I IlL .. I- T - J..-=KI I- _ " . == I t: ---' ~r- >- '- f-t/..,k:: - IJ~«.r j- = . I\R 5-0 c- 1--"1' .1.. .' ~ ~ ~. ¡¡¡a I 1131 h/JÆ~- ./11 '-L...-" '-!I-. \ '-- -< ¡ " R= - ./ '-I-- '- c- '- ¡ . / ~ I-- r ~ ¡= r~':ï - H- ~ -~_ '- I- - I ..£.. \1- I I-- V ~ C- I~ \... I-e-~- ~·t ~_ IIII 11ti..t ill ~~~~~ : ' II t' n ~ v_ ~ "-r--.L.._ L-L- ¡..;;O . I I v ....... f"ë'[: " 'I . '" I-LJ)) _~ ~~ ~~~' ~':' .- =~ u~ ,¡if :z:~é\.~' ~:::= =~ =: -- ¡ifT LA I -- ~ ~..... == =:: t I-- R,-7-MF..I ~ (-, ~.~ :,' ~ "T ;:: --s~ ~......- f ,-,< ~y ~',)')Ioo. C-2 __ = -':'1-2... C-I * _ ~} 1--= T ~ 1087 = - t:: "------.~ s.~. Y0.< ~~ _ .,.,.... T.. , I I I HI LR s.u, '" ~ c-, ~ _ I ' .' i 1·1 T I . c Õ ~ s.u. *" "( ~ '" f- ,'[ ,"'f '::~i ',_ "'~:~Jè/6'~'i:~ ' f-- ~ ......¡:; "'GIt_..y !!.R. ""'8$-3' C'20-1 0 ...... ~ - s.u. * C -I To C·/ SUe S.u. - ~-,/ ~ f-t- I-- - ~\/. L, ,- t= l ~ .--..- -- '-- J ,\ ¡ ¡ ,- ~"ë---- ~ ~ C-2 -tm~ !.¡.OClE1~ ~~ ID-777R rTl I // \W 1 ì~~ --C V (C- ill ~ ~ C-~~ ~. l" CH Rl\~.)c'~ I. ~~ ~Y' ~= I '--- --- :1 .r,., I c- j. J. . !C'2 (fZ 8~·60 c..1. T'ø '·Z 5U· 820 ---.. '~ \ \ ~ \ ~ \ \ ¡ D/F. c""""...r.. C-2 C-2 I~-, = PD/À u\ " " \ \ """ c- ......... IS )~\ \ \ \ \./ ! , , \ c- , \ FP \ \ , \ \ f-. I-- \ " ~- !- , f-- '. \ I r 1- '.... I'JTTT ~ v-il ~;\ ,,/ . ~ c- FP FP . j J ¡ I T I I r f- f-. f- Jl. -- - -T R-NE !- I-- Ii ~ '*= L.-" rom l- I I I I ~ ,LRr u "t, . I·,~} ~ . : - . " .. ~ .. ~ t .. .. . .. .. .. 0) C- - - -- - ~ 0\1.. r...1.~.u.~ / / : ~ c . ,. .. i .. c .. Page 5 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 '- 7. PZ 85-58 '-- .\.....- ( ( Chairman Bowe will be worked o e it is put on a City Council agenda. The motion carried 5-0. Request of D. S. Byrd to rezone Lot 3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, from its present classification of C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos (with restrictions) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos. This property is located on the south side of Maplewood Drive at Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Chairman Bowen said the restrictions were: no outdoor lighting, no cars older than two years, and hours from 8 to 5. Doyne Byrd came forward. He said there were only two restrictions they are requesting to be lifted: the lighting, he said they need to keep down thefts, and the hours, they request the same as their competitors. Chairman Bowen asked if he did not wish the restriction removed regarding the age of the cars, two years old. Mr. Byrd said they could live with that. Mr. Schwinger asked if there were other businesses adjacent to them that have later hours. Mr. Byrd stated there were. Mr. Schwinger asked if there would be complaints from the residents on Maplewood about the lights. Page 6 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 ( '- PZ 85-58 APPROVED 8. PS 85-47 PS 85-47 APPROVED 9. PZ 85-40 '--... ( Mr. Byrd said the lighting would shine on the cars, not the neighborhood. Mr. Schwinger asked if the lighting would be brighter than Showbiz. Mr. Byrd said it would not. Chairman Bowen said the City Ordinance requires the lighting be kept within their boundary. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-58 and lift the restrictions of lights and business hours. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Wood voting against. Consideration of changing the name 0 the street, Linma Lane, to Day to Drive. Mr. Wood made the mo . n to approve PS 85-47. This ion was seconded by Ms. Nash and e motion carried 5-0. of proposed Thoroughfare Chairman Bowen said the City Council has requested the Commission review the following areas: 1. Susan Lee Lane-Change from C4U to C2U. 2. Vance Road-Change from C4U to C2U. 3. Holiday Lane-Question: Is M4U appropriate in areas where development restricts R.O.W. and ability to widen paving to 48 ft. Page 6 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 ( - 5. PZ 85-58 6. PZ 85-59 "-~" ( Request of D. S. Byrd to rezone Lot 3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, from its present classification of C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos (with restrictions) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos. This property is located on the south side of Maplewood Drive at Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen said due to illness, this request will be postponed until June 27th, 1985. Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ to rezone a portion of Lot 1, Block 25, Snow Heights Addition, a Tract 2B, W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, from their pres t classifications of U (Schoo , Church, & Institution District) a R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-1 ommercial). This property is loc ed on the south side of Northeast op 820 and bounded on the west by t Richland Hills Church of Chr' Chairman wen opened the Public Hearin and called for those wishing to s ak in favor of this request to p se come forward. Charles Owen, 5425 Martin Drive, came forward to represent to church. He said they had outgrown their present facility and had purchased more property and had already started on the street. He said they plan to take Industrial Boulevard down into Meadow Lakes. Mr. Owen said they have 12 acres with 6 acres in parking lots. He said they put in a temporary parking lot on this property because they hold three services on Sunday morning and all parking is full. Mr. Owen said they have had some groups interested in purchasing the church, but they do not want to purchase these 6 acres. He said it makes the package too large to be feasible. . . ( ( '- . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 17, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-58 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM 'C-2-SU' TO 'C-2-SU' REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 123 '- We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~t¡{~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development "-- Zoning Review PZ 85-58 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 pz" ·····.f!:5~5R !woulµap-pteolate your reviewing 'Z,oniDg T\:C' 11·r-,(.. 1"'\þ"..t·""{""1:,··';'¡··g· +0 t'hLê;""i·"'':ëO'''J." n'y OJ.(:',.... Tot 1:::, "", " -~ ":"'" ,,;...l~"" ',:.:,~,v~., .,'¿,-l.,,¡'l ",~',I. "....,':", _.ok"" .....,""",.~! .1 ,..ole., _ ...... .... r 1 ';:"!:1 .,,,,,,.; '''" 'A.. ,'" "'. ,,·1 d· ;.,1., J.. .0··..., '.'." + "'. d· Q J·a· r·· U"" ¡' " ., q ,Qk. ,~.- ti".,.;... "... "''' Co.,\,.<. _ t.. .¡. ,{ '" ',". ""'''' 7 . ".I,.,.. ;¡ 1 ...,,_.,.,.. o:cc1ir~f:;,tj,CC JI.(J(;k ?~; ì.- ~he ~~ipulations placed on the zoning fer sale o~ C?!'3 are unfair, disçrimalltory and prc)-;itd tiVEè to "', f'lJl"\ c-,··t ·1' 0""'1"'1"'1 ¿~ ··.···a '<:::1 ··ai iT ~""hJ· c;,) 'hu~ ~ n e c: co. \.:,.; ....".L ',,~ '~ ,,~>.f, ,,:~,~:t? :": ~i~0 (~, ,,J..;~,""'- ,~~ ~ ..."..1.. ",-",¡.,;,;).. ':2he specific ctipulatiorœ thR.t shonlè. ae follows:. . I" err;o~re Òe 8. re 'T'.TOL' ~d1..t'·.... - '·;f1"'t'ho"t'·1J."(,.n+<::: +}l':> CR"~<'~ Cl~t:'''''''''''n1q..1 , '- ·......,e"r,t: ,..,,,.~ " ,,:",: """ ,:'. .' :"~" ~". t..;¡ ':'.. v J...<',' i.;,,,- ~ c,,'.!;;. \,,) ~,,_. '''_' ::::' ..¡," ~""tj \;.i.. v.. . fO.r Ë~,le!l!1,re an lnvltatlon to "theft T''')c} V2,üC)[:;'}::"S¡:l. r~,,·<~trJ· rd'l~ ""·,,,to ca ,., "" not ¡·Ylo,r C· t'h ~ '''\ t¡Hn :,\'¥'~" ( , "",,,,* ~~ ," ~,I,'J;,,'J, " ,,' :..," ,-Ji;.):.::) .' -./ '. :,," L "J.!,iq,.. " '," +;!.,.,; .vcars01d ... '¡'h.at :i.S morE: reDtrit:t:1 Vç~ tha.n ::1n:/ necw..car def,3.1er or any other dealer iI', '1'\",.. "'~"lt·, f"1"un ty ~ ~,..f....,¡,."C.~..L , ,I,: ~....,), ,,' . !5u;~Jness HdÜps of 8 to 5.Je sho ulù be 8b1e to function asa11;yretal1. used ca.r·' facility vd th tbesame hours as our competition. ""'1.. 1 "t'l ,to . . , 1 .....'oË' rC<:T;8. TIlng s~pu 2.il.ons a.rè 8,c:reeao e p1 eas!J,nt a:ppenrance and orderly traffic and conducive to fl O'N . ::;¡.nd .cOmmer:ts are appre elated. s. E'~"rlèt, "~i' '",-:$,1; i?~';;" '.... " _., _..., -.,;;,_ _. '. ..... ., _ . _. ... '. .."_ ~; ~i;·"j;::iì«;..,ç'r.¡";"~';"¡ :,,:".! .; .' :,<,\:'~i:";~1?:!,;i\,. .:'{ ',i .~<. ; \ . i, . . .... . . . . I""'" '... oW , ..' ~___".,~.__."""""""","" ,.~_... ....,..,,~. ._. ..... ".____~.__... .~_... _ ',.. . jy,:'~ ,. n. _.. ,". ,0. __,_, .. ... . _. ~_""'''''. ,¡:h .!' L), :\."'1 A',.j.i '1 I' ) ,/1 .:) 7 \. -j:1 {:~ ~ .r. f~:' ~(iþ,~ "RA";""I"p r I " 1\, ¡ Ii 511 T"'f.;¡;;";~'I"" . .. "," . "", :,- '),f~ ~" : ,,:}, \ ' 'Q/tr Wori':¡:. ' .. '. . I¡ j _I TI!T it) 1~ ,~; IJS,;.,', ;,).~li~·:á ,'~' .... ;. " "",' ~ ~"J ð:'¡ . " le; ¡ri,:" ~'~ j ~ n .,'.ï B .. , ;1 ~ ~ ~ .1 .,' " $." "";\-t: 1ft' ,. ."'. . -) I , .J... .,;Jy"¡.J,;;,.~ £ Vi-:-..,.....-· ~ ~ I: 0'0 C...¡ l.r¿ ~¡: ~,~11 ~ ~ö ,/ :::c~ <;.J. 't C( ..... CO ?~~ GJc,~!. ) ~ ~ :(~- \ 11 ~;. ~~~ ~~)) _--.~~:q.::;':.,-,..,,:..,.,¡~ \j ~;;.¡..¡'~ ' ' ';.~.i"l (J - T~'" .". tot.. Z. ~ j~, ,....... ,....~ .¡ ¡~': !~':' ~. w .~, ......... cr Q 1.iè :~~"'-~ ¡~ ~', '(~ ''i, l,:r , j ~ loJ . " ;¡~'ó '.f#. !/)" ~ II¡ to: "i ... 3 .. It Q <0 ~ " ~ ~ ~ ... ~ 41~ -Jo It " ~ J ~\ '1 1 , .. ~ ;1 t~ . ii '___'ij ~ - t ~ . j ~ i .~ /9J3 _J.J.J.J.:l, :W,1.I.'N IiI J."J , H ICHWAY . " ~~.3,~ ~,:~ Plat ShowinL : Iî .. ; .!,í :1 ··11 t~ !ì .~. ;¡ ¡J ~~ .~ 'f'''' ." ",.,,¡ : !""'l l'r, ~J "'..' \4' .., l1J;. .i '."H ,J ,I.D t~· i.' :",} ;";:J, '""'C ~'. '.. .- . --. 1 ,. ... .. . __._ r, I" . ,. ,i. '~~"')I':"·(..~. ',;4",',("" . I\)::¡;,.J~ ... ~ ..,~ ! ;i ,i",. .j! ., ~t. ,.e 1 "~~Î ~ ...:-~, v.. 3locl( 23 CLEA..~VI¡'::t.¡ ADDITION . - w·...··.. '.. ,'!U, 1..'; , 'l'~';X . ~., t ì :'.; Jcing a revision of Tràet .1., nlocl~ 23, Clenrvi(H/. Add ition ~n addition to the city of. North Rieh.. land Hills, Tarra.nt County, TexAs. ",:', }."\.. ... '. . . ". "1I'r m -< i I : (, ....-. " ¡ (", . ..'/. . c, ~. . : c . or)'~':"··!:A.r;¡ : z~ ,~." :"'%')('Î· ~ _ ! ~c, ;; ~~ '''';'.Qr '" ,1-.". . : r: :ó ~ :; 0 ." Aie"" · \~...:-f:l.,-, --- í jiiS ;;;:; ~ .i.:,:¡, . \1 ,.". ;~!',;ì"W" ·~i, . . .:;:.;:- 0 .... 'r¡ '~r\' "<~rl*r tk.(w·i¡JO'~~W"<o'n·"F~"ho.... ....~. .f/;. /.," ,>. o. , . 2'''"'''''.;; · ~~~;~~'!i;~''''~'''!'I1l~ 1!I!¡Id"'Q.'U~.. "to 0, !hoy,OPP..' on ."id map of 'oeo'd o'¡'¡ tho,. Qf. no Yi'ibleoncrqachmcmts e~copt 0$ shown. s.col.j~·;·:7;;:· - ':~Õ""~~~T7~"" . ~..:¡;.;r:;-~.:z;:.:;.;"z-' '," .. _..~ <':"'J ':r),am¡;¡J10n .. , '. ~~ir ..J >..") /1' ,. { '(i.. '" " .,r.r"-" .'. " .:.;. \.....;. ~7.~ ';'/'¡ -:'," \. '. 'f!/¡· " :;:;:k ":+) : r ':~ '!ii ' ;' ~¡ ,. ;¡>"",ìj \{}" ,,iJ~~:';:t; Wr3:\~or:Z!!..L NANCOC~ 0._"__. "ON PlNI reøi1tørød pu,bliciuruc:;orno. 1326 ·x.x -..,...... F[¡..;G 234..$243 .1 ...__..... ¡;'O¡S O'Ai\C STAKES 6144 a E~STC!;:I,..~NAP STRE;ZT .T.e ___ uTIliTY LINE - ( . ,..!>.~ ~TH. .f?<"~ ~?r' _; ....,:-- IAN"....Y »Wii ~ ;< C ')1\....., .~ 't \... (, r~ \'. ) .. : ""Jr ~.. .... ð 11:,...... I..~. -.....' "'!' it \ -"·or'~-··~,.r~--;"",,_._.~, "'-17 '-r ....._..,.. ...,....... ._'"-,, ¡~ vql.38~rhc£173 . '1'1 ~,. .~~ if"~ :t'. ~¡i ~> ~: t~ ft' ; At' ti' ~l îJ " ~'. u, / " <. f ~ . ,i) . [' . .. ;1 I,.! oj ~J ~ " '''-0 ~', ........ ;1 .4 ~ " . " tJ .1 ;i :, ;' a " ;, J. =-, :¡ ..... ;1 - I; ,I r: r :¡ ., " ., " ~ ! ì: ., " .; .. (.1 ~ " .. ~. I' " " 'I ! .1 .) : I ¡. , , t: :/ .. ,. i! ',! ;, ;1 \ t' ,.; ~ ' .. '. t~ ..¡ I t. " " 'i ," ., I, r" ! :' , ".- ;""..- ORDINANCE NO. 1253 -- AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 .. ,,' "'. AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ..... ....- RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ85-58 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos (with restrictions) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos. ......... BEING Lot 3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-48, Page 173, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. ,-. This property is located on the south side of Maplewood Drive at Grapevine Highway. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 27th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. -- '- Chairman, Planning & Zoning Commission ...... Secretary, Planning & Zoning Commission '- BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY éOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND'HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.PZ-85-58 IS HEREBY REZONED C-2-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF USED AUTOS THIS 22nd DAY OF JULY, 1985 WITH THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS:. -- Mayor ATTEST: '- Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY '- Rex McEntire, City Attorney '- '- '-' L' L L L L L L ~. ,~\.,_. ~ ,. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning· and·. Driêløpment North Side of Harmonson Boac1 West of Rufe Snow 'Council Meeting Date; 7/22/85 Agenda Number; PZ 85-61 SUbject: Zoning. Application· Ordinance No. f244. This Zoning Applicatiònts pÙsented on the existing r.sidential tract located on the , north side of Ha-rmonsonR.øad west of Rufe Snow Drive..rbe roperty is 3.75 acres in size. The requested rea:cmtng·u.from R-3 single Famllÿ 4SD Duplex Separate OWnership. The applicants stated purpose is to build' a d ex project on the site. The Staff noted to the e~dssion that the subject tract was sur.rounded by residential zoning with the exception.oftbe rear where a tract facinS(;le'I.'Ì-view Drive is also zoned R-4 SD Separate OWnership. Thè.p'toperty also appears to be in· the flood plain of Mackey Creek which is unimproved' in thláa:rea. . .,~jr.,:. ,"" -,'- ..".> The Planning and Zoning.CoiÏmti.sion reconunended approval of'PZ 85-61 as submitted. I L L L L L L L L L L L L Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ;;:Ing B:d1 iI#ù .. . I!JI. '-~ ~~ HtIIIíI SIQIIaIure City Manager . CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. N",mbðr . Sufficient Funds Available - , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 - ~~ f " . (I~"¡" I I '. _ ~ LR U --........;. ~1211/(. 2 I 'I! ..-.- tu'f'J:l-Y'1~ I' ~~I . IITTt I I l . _I L _ _ ! ill III ".. ^ " "l ¡::::r:::)] · I '" viT\i ~ '-'- "", ~ --J.' ~' ~ ~' ./' ~JI Tit' 'fJ ,,~~" I IÇ;qp;¡' ~~~:::~> ~~t t: \J _~ I, " ~,",' : ~ ,_:-1- '~~;.. '11[1::.i~(L--r=; ," ........... ~ y\..... ~;'l 1...... I ~ I. Yff)~-X~'-'- ~"""( I 111·lTw- i 11~' 'Á" '''''''0/ ~ I ! . _ '\ }r:- '- ;- ( (~' \ ~:Il .' I It: PT 1 V/" Wf±±±±J ,! 0- '-,,. , ! ' H'"' Ul. .J I FñrTT\~ ~~l.ll /. / ',n:ífF~ri ~;. "II"... >- !! I r iF CI- _'_~ I=- ,=.~ \f '\ ' _ ,. '" I 11= _I-. I-- - '- ~ I "l'J--j',I!,. " --... ,- 'lTt1 · ii" ~ ~ '_'~' '1 "'L..,:¡~'d-r+IFR~ 11111~{13~~~.~~" ,-}V ^ ,,1:" ,~_CT I ,::ì~ u· I' ì ',,\'-..<11f'" ~,i ii' , IT Tf-- I IC.lrr I' IT " . \rl~~t--- hjlH-1 I, ""0 I [I"l lilT rrnfWl,"H 0 Ii ~.~ ,:~'-'r' '\ ~.T ",'1'0 H"" I ¡:" ~ì .': \ . 'L '-/iJ~\' ',!iTT I "I . ~,~_T TI .. t- ,T ·'t I I " >-IH . I I i ?"Ç" Iii ~I-- r-I ~:.<.. i: ,þ.., 'R :::t::¡ !~I!) ~~:, M'< R-7-Mf 1 "'." ~ i 1ì1 TTTT1 e:;-:;:: ~;=' r+ ~'ì \"<! 1 í)'¿..- L - ,,, 1 -¡::: H \ -'/' c- f-- L 1- HI--· - .-. -' \ ¡ _ I! I ' r....... }-~.'-- ''--? .Á '- C -+- '-'- -. . 1- '- \~~~' 0-i ~ I " I -, ± t!= :~~:~ ~ <-t= ~ I-i os.::. U >- II . W9::L ~ ~ .r-j'1 _ -K~I~ ~§ .~I ~ ~ ~~.¡, L I, --1 ,0;/).'(.I,..- § !§ . R-7- fj:1---.\::/"ê: t=_ S Iii;; 11-' '- -! "7-','" U '~II.F V ,y/ ~>- ,...., II '3 1-.' I · C-' b t'--L - I- - Tlil' 1 ~ ¡ i-J- - .,q_ f-- ; II ..:. 1>-2' >-<= I // ,.:jf ~~t:: I ,-, 'I ~ II 11 I=t: Cr /~ } "77"->= l rv -; n If'f- := -- - ic- - '" '=::: IY,; ~ I'T C-~ ¡ ~~ """. __ -' I IT.I I "'" I ~- Y q~-Ir~:~; H/:::r J.- '~ I ¡. I !I':: ¡I.: =-' 1-2 C t:::::::::. ! i.....1= 1--1- 1-, I.YV.;< ,....../,,¢ // I 11 l- ==- ....,... ,:;:J:: ~Ë ~.~ ~ --Y LI I 11; .:... '- --,;: L- ,-- J' ~i. · --...,,?" ~ _'. L- '~I -:~ ./ . ';¡ ~-,...... ~~.y Ir-~'I I--n::::~ __ '-00-< >-- 1"'1--1 7L'V~/ l :1,11 i I .. , I---::J '"'101 I- I- ' . I ~'< \ >-+- i= l~~ f-:k- ~~I I/)J C "<4-B ~.~ 1<' %l I '::J¡¡,t;. I" ',.~ í IL I ~"1 ~ I ¡ I [ 1m I Ii, l I .. I~ C-I ~ l~ /3;0 (£ì ~^/ tZ ~~~~ ~ C.-I .,.. C°'l ---" U-PD "- '.......... "- - - ....... /R;;,' - - - R- "- c:'" , " -- - - - - > ,/ - - == S.u. - - '- '- -.. · , ...... --- .1\ \ , - "i- ., R-I F.p. · · . l' c;.". yþ J."~" ...... ,1If J.~~ ~.. ..... .. .. . ....,. __ i . I-2 .. - -- - Page 13 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 '-- 8. PZ 85-61 '-- PZ 85-61 APPROVED ---- é ~ ( Request of Bill J. Fenimore and J. V. Frank to rezone Tracts 2G5, 2G6, and 18A, Mahalya Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from their present classification of R-3 (Single Family) to R~4-SD (Separate Ownership Duplex). This property is located on the north side of Harmonson Road, approximately 650 feet west of Rufe Snow Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He said this property is 270 feet wide and 605 feet deep and is 3.7 acres. He said they plan the same type separate ownership duplexes as is on Westchase Drive. Mr. Stembridge said Mr. Fenimore is a quality builder, building in areas such as Parkridge Estates. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There'being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-61. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker, but said there is already some R-4-SD in the area and hope to see more mixed uses in the area. Chairman Bowen agreed since that is a re-development area. The motion carried 4-0. " ( ( . KNOWL TON-E NG LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC. "- CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 17, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-61 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-3 TO R-4-SD REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 147 '-- We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-61 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR.. SUITE 550 · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 -- ') ,Ii C' pz- 8f;-bJ () .--.. FULTON & MIZELL SURVEYING. INC. 1 115 ST. LOUIS AVE. FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76104 (81713315·36215 May 2, 1985 Description for Zoning Change Being 3.750 acres situated in the J.L. LYNCH SURVEY, Abst. No. 953, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all of those certain tracts of land conveyed to Larve Atmentrout by deed recorded in Volume 1310, Pages 381 and 385, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and to John Wywias by deed recorded in Volume 7092, Page 1464, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 3.750 acres being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a point in the centerline of Harmonson Road, said point being the southeast corner of said Wywias tract; THENCE WEST, along the centerline of said Harmonson Road, 270.00 feet to the southwest corner of said Atmentrout tract; '- THENCE NORTH, along the west line of said Atmentrout tract, 605.00 feet; THENCE EAST, along the north lines of said Atmentrout tracts and said Wywias tract, 270.00 feet to a point; THENCE SOUTH, along the east line of said Wywias tract, 605.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 3.750 acres of lanà. Job No. 85117 ORDINANCE NO. 1244 ',- AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-61 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-3 to R-4-SD. -- BEING 3.750 acres situated in the M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, City of North Richland Hills, T&rrant County, Texas, and being all of those certain tracts of land conveyed to Larve Atmentrout by deed recorded in Volume 1310, Pages 381 & 385, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and to John Wywias by deed recorded in Volume 7092, Page 1464, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 3.750 acres being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the centerline of Harmonson Road, said point being the southeast corner of said Wywias tract; THENCE West along the centerline of said Harmonson Road, 270.00 feet to the southwest corner of said Atmentrout tract; THENCE North along the west line of said Atmentrout tract, 605.00 feet; THENCE East along the north lines of said Atmentrout tracts and said Wywias tract, 270.00 feet to a point; THENCE South along the east line of said Wywias tract, 605.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 3.750 acres of land. '- Page 2 '- This property is located on the north side of Harmonson Road, approximately 650 feet west of Rufe Snow Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. ~æ~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND--ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-61 IS HEREBY REZONED R-4-SD THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1985. -- '- MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '- r -- L ... L L CITY OF . NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and D~'V~l()pment Subject: Zoning Application.$óûthside of Watauga Road Ordinance No. 1246 !astOfRufe.Snow Drive .. CouncnMeetlng Date: 2/22/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-65 I L L L L L L This Zoning Applicationls presê~t~4~~the vacant mult:~"~~~1.~#ract located on the south sid.e ,of Watauga Ro~dappr()2t~~tely500feeteastof~~e<Sn.ow Dri.ve. The subject property .is approximatel,.12.~e¢;-es<~t\ sbe. .. Thereque..~~4rezon:t.ng is from R-7 MF Multi-Family toC-l Co~rci"~'~e:purposefor the re<¡uestistoallow the applicants to develop a strip shopp:t.ngçet'l.~et <on. .tbe site. . The Staff noted several items fromtbe request for Commiss:f...onQonsideration. L '" (1) 'the proposedThor()u;g~far.Plånshows Watauga R~~d,,\afietJix lane· divided street· requiring 110 feet ·of rightof~~Y.'..r,rl:1e developers oft~~.~1:~c:~are aware of this requirement and have indiQatedefutUr$dedication in tbeirzOtatng description. (2) . The proposed de'V¡~Op1lt.ntofia.8.trip¢enteralon$.Wetau8aR.oad could present some difficulty in tbedesign.of adiyi.de:d;-oadway section. ..:tfthedevelopmentis divided into individual "pad" sites mult~?~~..d1:ive openings Tlill bctireque:sted. With tbe median control ofa divided roadway on.1y e<li1R:t.ted number of points can. be granted two way access. (3) In the originalla)l'out<~ft~~<Pt"opertY,tbe.ap?~i¢"t1jssketcbed a proposed location for a street tht"ougb,·ttt~:tt",p-roperty which. didn.ot1:'C!ltIte ... to the existing street pattern on Watauga Road.Subs~quentl}'.a.more definitive 8~~cbwas submitted which indicated the proposed street.elign1ngwith tbe existing street on tbe north side of the road. L L L L L L L The Planning and Zoning Co.d.$s1onrec_ended approval of Zon:f...ng Application PZ 85-65. . Finance RevieW ( Source of Funds: L Bonds (GO/Rev.) operating Budget L'[~~,~{~jtj";L;<i ." ; ". .... <.....j>¡¿f¡/~ -, .. .... (D$p~rtnt Hea~~.Qn~...r!,". ..' I City Manager L .. · .. .. ...... ... ·..CITYCOt.JNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct~ Number Sufficient Funds Available ----- , Finançe Dlreçtor Page 1 of 1 "-......"------,.- -<-LJ....I./ \,~. '~I I I r i 7'j~ I ';; I ~~~ /íH::: I-Ë u I~·.:;o.r J< Y - ~d,q-~..- ,"~-- " , "'II! ~ rl \ T \- I i---' I- 'I 'I 1 II ¡I \ II I I i \ r rm rL '-HR . ill-~ .. .' I::W t::t: - - f- -- I~ I R-7- MF {:::, ~tjlTl.J..W to- .L! I ¡ I I \ . F r ! Þ\" f-....j r..- ; - 1-1- - '1t"f- -.. " \ ::: i---' I"'~ ~.y..t: __; èr: I- H 11°' ..0- '~".T". O. ~ C-I E= - l- I- :: = /ITTi l- f- . '- f- f-f-- R-2 1125- L..... _ tEST DR '-- -- II. ' , I ,-r Tl:iE ~ L.. ,-nT r1 f- r l TT ... A==- t:: 'TITilUJ/~ . ~ II t::::~ I~~ ~ "I< ~ì 'I Ef :;'v~;>, ""V "("./'r/_y ~ .--~ ,,:;:,__._ .""\'" '" I c:::t::J r-r--'" ,""1 :v~'?j R = 1=1- I I (::::/ N /. :)Jff\?>... U - = >-t: 'L ¡ Y,?iF+-"'->X'\. C-I = f=1:: I T -~ .-v~li.I¡:::I::iß).\ ~ L-:: I T H .... ~ ~,w~<gJ~~ II..J III I ~§; f _~ _ 'i~~~. ~~',,-v.::: ~'Y~); S=~I 1,1 ~f....\ __ I-k>:<:- ,,'\ "''' ,>"^ '.?'J::j '-L.ln' ...... S - I / A.. .,....::;:r !,... t::::I:=!~ ~y ,~tl' ;~¡, tI'~~" '" 'm,~ì~~ '- ;::'bl- ~ y ". ~~.-1 lJ...1,¡ - ~0("1 ~ II I .., f--, "'fH 1b-. ~!il ~¿, Till -¡ I- I I I L.-\t~· ~ . \ II' Ri -'\.~" 11 J:::: I b\' ,',:r' ~ I, ¡\ ~ill Pr-,'-::?·... ··r.~ III H ¡ II T \~~i ì \ \ .lJ-I :::J ~ , I II '=i<i:>!!!!! III . gl-l 'TIT ~6 ~~~* ~...' I III~\~ "~I I: I j -?-1["""'"T"<; TrIT 'w¡ v..... 1111111/ t:. 'T j /,,,,y.; ~ .,.., 1"1.. Pi J~-"ç j .;(\~V1(~ I . µ 'C-I;, R-7.¡.!,P c- c-, ,"" 1 -&~~~ ~~ ¿ . ... ~)UI ~< .-Co-' 1176 1176 \ AG kr,,;~x~.-, ~ '-1-(ç..~20~ = ~ tl~ R-7-M;':-'-- AG \ F.P. ~.' f.,:? ~,x<' ;-.., yV~ 'YA.. = I:k ! \ t::=l.~ '\' ^ 7TT ...,Æ\ 'Çj II\~ i \ N-i ~.( .~ I -, ~.yrQ~ ~~ý7 - ~. \ :¡ ~. ,fi(.~t3J l~..: \~~~II ~ [1:~~'c.¡r. >¿S: T 1W=¡i=- f ,~- <.j SO' r! ~;Î"fill --....; .;..~~~~JlJ~fL?[!¿; =T~·t ~ 1V~ -lli.U )< \ ').' ~b ~ -"'- X '>..v...¿ , i I 'T . - ~n- ~~ ']" -r í'í/"\ "'< ;<k ì I riTl .~~ -- 9 '---.:11 ;nK "A \ TT Q-:)..:: -¡ n,_", .. .. ~ - ~,,~.,~2 :1~~,~ 'T ;~_ 1-2 ~ ¿~I ~II .....¡".q ! =r \ I!- 1-_" :-+-11 ~c:t;-; H r-- _ i ...- I- c. ~ ~ ....".... .... ...0 O¡;II ...j , ~.ï~' I 1 1'- II I- :: ~ 1-, \11 "I I 1 '~I" ".:Ir~r ~"U"I¡I:;","_il~~~03.\L II ;~clii ~ ~ f---j . ~~ I- .,-~~~ T t-I \11 ~ r' ~~ t- I-tJ/~ß~ .f- c- '-'()¡,. . T r ~ l- . '<:ð. - ,~-.. '/:: . ~ ..........:~ ,....// -..... ."":1: ~ . I ¡ ¡I~('\\/T '-V ¡~~"m UjJ:P -1ìT\ \ ), I Ii" I , I -, t+-iP ~ -T ~-7-MF '~þ:'t±J ~~~- i:mIl Im~ ~ff'H-J 4-k -k T ,yy c- ''''~I EI=~~+-'~~-' h, =-¿ª I - - .£:=F= d;:J:-H 1-; -\ ~"r1 I ""Y\~ I" " r'OT ~W. '~)-'r C-I - r--- - ¡::f1 II 1 I-- ~ AG ~ 1IIII , I - I---- ~ , I I I r-,- I 11- C-I 1166 R-6-T 1167 - t--- ....fa '5-"'" / ' e.-I f-- LRM ... f' s.u:" G·.z. I .-..- U.l II I-; I T ~ , ¡,..¡ I ,I- ",:1 ::::¡, ~~\. )<)..0 Jt ~ É\ t--?~ ,,( -)) '~, i- t:-,~' I, 't:. '¡g/~ I r '-, f I I II I , I \ I -!! \ F. R-3 . - - - ~o ," ..+ ." .~~ ..,...... .... " ~ Page 16 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 ( ( -- 12. PZ 85-65 Request of R & G Associates to rezone a portion of Tract lA, John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753, from its present classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-l (Commercial). This property is located on the south side of Watauga Road, approximately 500 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. '-. Richard Farrar, Dallas, came forward. He said this property lies between C-l and C-2 zoning with R-7-MF to the south. He said they propose to connect their street with the street across Watauga Road, but the cuI de sac will be temporary. Mr. Farrar said they will dedicate an additional right-of-way for the widening of Watauga Road. He said they would work with the City Staff since it will be a divided street. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-65 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-65. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. 13. PZ 85-66 Request of Bill Fenimore to rez 2Al, 2A2, 2A2B, , 2A3, 2El, 2E3, M. Survey, Abstract eir present classification -3 (Single Family) to R-6-T (Townhouses and Garden Homes District). This property is located at the southeast corner of Glenview Drive and Dawn Drive. ( ( ',- . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-65 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-7-MF TO C-l REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 85 -- We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ,~ P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoniryg Review PZ 85-65 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 - CHARLES E. BELEW ( P. O. BOX 602 '- ADDISON, TEXAS 75001 HAND DELIVER May 13, 1985 The City of North Richland Hills TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This letter shall grant my permission to R&G Associates -~ to rezone the frontage of a plus (+) or minus (-) 49 acre tract of land on the south side of Watauga Road and east of Rufe Snow Drive in North Richland Hills, Texas. ~ ct, R1~ North Richland Hills Joint Venture CHARLES E. BELEW --- \\ (' '-. May 7, 1985 R & G Associates 3131 McKinney Avenue, Suite 450 Dallas, Texas 75204 Attention: Mr. Randolph R. Perry North Richland Hills Joint Venture 15820 Midway Road Dallas, Texas 75234 Attention: Mr. Charles E. Belew -RE: Approximately 70 acres of real property located near the Southeast corner of Watauga Road and Rufe Snow Drive, City of North Richland Hills, Texas, more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property") Gentlemen: - The undersigned is the holder of a first lien deed of trust (the "Deed of Trust") encumbering the above-described Property. The Deed of Trust contains a provision prohibiting the rezoning of the Property. It is our understanding that R & G Associates ("R & G") has contracted to purchase approximately 49 acres of the Property from the current owner of the Property, North Richland Hills Joint Venture ("NRHJV"). R & G is not obligated to perform under such contract unless and until a portion of the Property is rezoned. The undersigned hereby consents in all respects to the rezoning of the following described portion of the Property to either the zoning classification "C-l" or "C-2" under the applicable zoning ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas: all or a portion of that contiguous part of the Property within 350 feet of the southern right-of-way line. of Watauga Road. The undersigned further agrees that paragraph ll(c) of the Deed of Trust shall not apply to the rezoning herein described; provided, however, this waiver letter shall not apply to the rezoning of the Property to a classi fication other than C-l or C-2 nor shall it apply to any other portion of the Property except that portion herein described. Very truly yours, TRUSTEES, E-SYSTEMS, INC. POOL TRUST 065lQ '-- or ~ ( 1'-. l -- "--... h '!It.'" v ,,\)~ I ~ Z "8 « .. ..J Q. ~ Z. _ 0 z= 0: 'g N· N- W 8 I- ~ - _c (I)~ 0 @z . 011. I!! ! HI J u: --- · j.., . '\( I . '- ORDINANCE NO. 1246 '-- AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-65 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-MF to C-l. BEING a tract of land situated in the John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of a tract of land as recorded in Volume 8114, Page 1203, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of a 49.159 acre tract of land as surveyed by Carter and Burgess, Inc. on April 11, 1985, and being more particularly described as follows: -- '--- BEGINNING at a point located South 02 degrees 57 minutes 46 seconds West, 85.00 feet from the northwest corner of said 49.159 acre tract, said point being 85.00 feet south of the existing centerline of Watauga Drive; THENCE North 89 degrees 49 minutes 54 seconds East, 1383.81 feet to a point for corner, said point being in the east line of said 49.159 acre tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 08 seconds East, 300.00 feet with the east line of said 49.159 acre tract to a point for corner; THENCE_South 89 degrees 51 minutes 00 seconds West, 1399.33 feet to a point for corner, said point being in the west line of said 49.159 acre tract; THENCE North 02 degrees 57 minutes 46 seconds East, 300.00 feet with the west line of said 49.159 acre tract to the point of beginning and containing 9.58 acres (417,160 square feet) of land. - ·,; ~ Page 2 '- This property is located on the south side of Watauga Road, approximately 500 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive.. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. ~¿~ . "'~\.. CHAI PLANNING/AND ZONING COMMISSION t' SECRET~Y PLANNI ~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-65 IS HEREBY REZONED C-l THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1985. -- '",,--, MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS y' L: L -.,. "_~_ ,.1 '-. "1".. ,-':... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning ancl'>Ðev~løpinent . Subject: Zoning Applicati~~$~t;h .of Shady Grove.Road. Wàs¡;;ofÐavis :Boulevard 7/22/85 Council Meeting Date: r I L PZ 85-46 Agenda Number: L On June 10, .1985 the C1.t,COU1\~~li1'te~dapublic hearing 01\ttit$ rezoning request by B.H. & L. Joint Ventures. Th.prP1)"'r7~'i'Jlocated.on thesout1î8"~~of Shady Grove Road west of Davis Boulevard. Th-i<apPI1Ç~n.t;t~<tequesting.. rezonin$ frØtltA~Agricul ture to. R-2 Single Family. The subjéctt't!a~ttøial.7 acres in size. At the earlier publiche~r~n~\.qu.EJt;onwas raised aø<t~~1îeproblems which might arise because of theP:rf)1C~~:f..~YOft~..<~chlandAreaRidin.Çlu1>to the proposed residential area. The"'PPJ.tc4.tlt_!!".Ba'rfield, asked .tha.t.th'e<lity Council table action on the zoning requesttoallowhimt()negotiate with the/1.'idtnaclub officials. Mr. Barfield has askedt~t:tnt!'>rØ,ql.\..øt be brought back to the City Council at this time. It is Staff'suncle1':s~~nctt~a~1\~tthe negotiationsar'$tillincomplete and in order to proceed withh:ts(te'Y'e~t\Jc~'I1F'Mr. Barfield willpropose;to<delete a portion of his tract adjacent to the Ridin~.<ll~J)'"s a reserve. Thisrese.rve.will be submitted at a later date when final decisions arelllade between the Riding:Clu1> and. the applicants. L L L L L L L L L L ~ u ~~~~ :, Source of Funds: - Acct:~ÎI1)!!?II1 ¡ I Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ SufflctentFunds ~vaifable 't~ ~ Ç4~~ ~ Depa~ead Signature CJ\yManager ' CITYCt!N:NCIL ACTION ITEM , Finarn:e Director P.age 1 of L~· .' L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L Source of Funds: L Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating. Budget ~~- LI~¥:'¿'-h~ Depa en1 Head $Ignature ' L . CITY CØUNCIL ACTION ITEM CITY OF >NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Devalopm.int Subject: Zoning Application ., Sbådy Grove Road West of Davis Boulevard , Council Meeting Date: 6/10/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-46 This Zoning Application is also one of the eight requests· by B~ H. & L. Joint Venture. This J:ract is located sooth of Shady Grove Road west of ;Davis Boulevard. The tract is 81.7 ~cres in size and 1ilabeiedtract 8 in the app;Licant·s submittal. The requested rezoning is from AG Agr1,è.ultu1:'eto 1,.2 Single Family Residential. In the earlier series o£:reque$ts the ¡applicant's had requested 1-3 Single Family zoning. The Commission c1isapproved that request and indicated their preference for R-2 Single Family zoning in.:thisarea.. 'Î'he applicant resubmitted this current case based upon that action and enlarged the area within the tract. . The Planning and Zoning(.:~s.$'iOttrecon:unendedthat Zon:l.ng~lieation PZ 85-46 be approved. Finance Review --..... Acet. Number Sufficient Funds Available - 1241L~ , City Manager , Finance Director "'11 "j" ., "~" ~~ J t --' Page 1 of '- -'---- '-- ORDINANCE NO. 1222 .. .. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS. OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 ... ... AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-46 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, and the Thomas Peck Survey, Abstract 1210, Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a point at the Southeast corner of Lot 17 in Block 1, Cherokee Estates, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, as recorded in Volume 388-68, Page 19, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 08 minutes West with the East boundary line of said Block 1, 956.7 feet to a point in the center line of a Continental Pipeline Company easement for the point of beginning of the herein described tract: THENCE North 00 degrees 08 minutes West continuing with the East boundary line of said Block 1. 371.9 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 55 minutes West continuing with the Easterly boundary line Qf said Block 1, 34.5 feet to a point; - THENCE North 01 degrees 06 minutes East continuing with said East boundary line, in all a total of 1778.8 feet to a point; THENCE NOrth 89 degrees 09 minutes East, 866.7 feet to a point; THENCE North 01 degrees 33 minutes East, 822.5 feet to a point in the right-of-way of Keller-Shady Grove Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 51 minutes East, 824.3 feet to a point in said right-of-way; T~ENCE South 00 degrees 29 minutes West, 716.7 feet to a point in the South right-of-way line of said Keller-Shady Grove Road; THENCE South 19 degrees 01 minutes West with the center line of a proposed road, 38.0 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the left whose radius point bears South 70 degrees 59 minutes East at 800.0 feet; v, . Page 2 "-- THENCE Southerly continuing with said proposed center line and with said ~ curve, a total arc distance of 222.6 feet to a point at the end of said .... curve; THENCE South 03 degrees 05 minutes West continuing with said proposed.' center line, 43,3 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius point bears North 86 degrees 56 minutes West at 1000.0 feet; THENCE Southerly continuing with said proposed center line and said curve, a total arc distance of 658.8 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 40 degrees 49 minutes West continuing with said proposed center line, 402.6 feet to a point; THENCE South 60 degrees 00 minutes East, 157.6 feet to a point; THENCE South 00 degrees 24 minutes West. 628.6 feet to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 36 minutes East, 84.4 feet to a point at the Northeast corner of a 41.7 acre tract of land as described in deed recorded in Volume 847, Page 436, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; - ---- THENCE South 01 degrees 21 minutes West with the East boundary line of said 41.7 acre tract, 93.0 feet to a point in the center line of a Continental Pipeline Company easement; THENCE South 78 degrees 49 minutes West with the center line of said easement, 1384.5 feet to the place of beginning and containing 81.7 acres of land, more or less. This property is located south of Shady Grove Road and west of Davis Boulevard. - ~ ~ , , .. '- ~ '-- '- Page 3 : APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF MAY, 1985. CHAIÆ~N~ ~ION .. , ~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE.NO. PZ-85-46 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS DAY OF , 1985.' MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ~ REX McENTIRE. CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . L L L I L ¡ L L r L r I L- L LL ¡ i L L L L L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Dévelopaent Council Meeting Date: 7/22/85 Agenda Number: PS 85-35 SUbject: ... ',' ...-.... .. ",' -, Plat AppU·C:.~10nlriarwood Estates Section 6 Thisapplica t ioni8þre8et1tè4~()rir:f.nal· .Pla t .t:onsider~~1.on.<of Briarwood Estates Se~tion 6. Thepro~~tYiJloça~edsouth of Starnes Road. and east of Douglas Lane. The-property iszonedl-2>~~tt.:l.e>'_llY. The plat proposesa.lotlayout in conformance with thel..2c:ri~er:ta,. The Staff and theCi~y.¡ng1n.et'.nQted several comments for the Planning and· Zoning Commission considerat1011: . ·0.." (1) A small port1Qnrø~~oti4.Y..Lane is ·shownøn\if~'~1uth end of the plat connected.~o~~e~p~r0'Veciplat.ofBriarwo~~·i'~ta~es t.o the south. . The plat proposes~~li~e~~..b1cl1re~()Ves . Holi4a~A'~~()D1'i~beiapplican t ' s property. The-apPliCant·8¡tlgin'er.hassubmittedala"~~f()t'/the future routing of Holiday LaneWl1:tcl1,verifies that the sma11 "'gfØnt on the plat will confonn to the Thorou.ghf~re.Pl~nand wi11link uP.~t.títhe other proposed 'and approved subdivis1()n~!nthe area. However. this proposed alignmet1t does present somed1ffif;:.u.l~1e~. . Most of the needeclright of way, even for the intersection ... sh01:f1\<9D:the'iPlat is off the.applit:ant' s property. The Commissiot1 should consider invoking thesu1)41V1.si~n.provision requiring the develoPêrto.c.q~1rei()ff-siterightiofway.atleast to the extent that the intersection.1s,secured and the alignment.t.s protected. (2) Starnes Road is propo.eci asa four lane Collector Street in the ThoroughfarePlanrequtring70 feet of right of ~Yand 48 feet of pavement. TheappltC:-t1~,,~ave indicated their willingness to dedicate the necessary right ()f way and escrow theirpor~ion.of the funds to improve the street. Theplat.:f.t1d±c.ät,s an additional dedication of 29.5 feet which should be sufficient. RECOMMENDATION: The P1.an:n1n~i~4iZøningCotnmissi()n appt'avedthe Final Plat of Briarwood Estates. Sect1oni6,,1tht~e stipulat1on.thatit)¡~applicant secure the off-site right of wayneeded.toc:onstruct the HolidaŸLäne intersection. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Nurnbef' Bonds. (GO/Rev.) SufficlenfFundsAvaUable ~_~~nåf~. ~~~~r r CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ..... , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 '., i' t={l L-........,...., -,;¡¡--r¡n- I ffi r::::.:"'M.. H .-.. 11111 II If 'I-"'" lr-t,"> _}-7t-1::.:'¡"::;"'U -L1/ . It: J-J- 0... r I ì _ ~ ¡... f-- -¡ '"1'!..J r- - "- ~ Z-I -9 1-- - ...... II esr. 1= r- i- - '- I.- ~M;\ ~~ W f- '\.\ ~ !::f~rL-,-'\)-/ ~. =-~ n-~ ~ IL. ï '- ~ 17~-Iti R-7-MF "-' T' 0: - . ~ '-j I t-.,\T~~ - t+<-,./'" _ r ...I P'''-- -f =--"-, rç:: .:.:-"'1 \..J..... \ f1T' ~ ; ì ¡ -. TTTl rTi-< 'I ~ .. ~ L ~_ ¡::::::I:::' ,-- - AG I -I ~ i.;::' c = <=8 >-i- [I:: II TTT'J ~ L-" " ~ == -:... "- -ôf- '3 _ "I'rl, ~ E -='~' 51..# ~ ~ I '11' t=: - ±:::l +- J ~ I I- ,UI T f1 - I:=: - 7.Z _ '- ~ .1 R - 2 - ~ C· ......~ j c::: /. ~ ,_ j" \--1 1111 ê..l n ,;: 'þ .53'~f(f ~V ill " ..)' pS ", n ~ 11-"- ,...., H,,,, >1 ,-c .. .. .....u f-- --¡ .!...~ _ 't T TT '- I J ~, IlH-illJ L II Tl ~ .u.w I IT ~ II -!Ill I V iTTT ., "R-I- 1£ I T ~rlJlI1. T ,.,...1 J U4 II 1800 Ie]; L.... W1 ~ rl J [.;7 AG D II 7 _ Lll lR-3,., ::::¡.~r= f: - ~:¡t;,:.2 ~_- _ AG _J '~L 0 ..- lJ];i \ ..·"t C _1->- _ .u LJ-I - ~ . . _ _ ~ ,_.~ . "" u !;!! - L- --4-' I '-'-' ";' . ...; -j , r: ,I ' 1/ ' I "- ,Till <ññúl I - \ F.p. I L, IIITI '~ll' 11 .-< ~ · I YÕ., LR j .... ~ ~ / SI I IT I I rttt1.h +,\-' ,m ~~ Ç-2 ,=, :r ~ ~/ // ¡:...J\ I' :i -¡ .... 'n: 'n 'J'm'Y . 7 Id--JI- J ..::::L. \::: \ ,. -<-II " \J I r':. (~ 'Yr '""1 ~ - C-2 r:=!, ~ i/" /' .. = ~ il J' I '.\ _ _ Y..~ -'.I- ~~.-Y- ...1/ ' /' ~WlJ.J.IJ..W.Jl ~? /, / ,_ '-' ~-: -'-'" + 11 Tl1"\ '\ ' >- 'C" I...... _/ - / r-c £Z ~i): ~¡, "I:: =>' mhi\' "" _f- J.. """"¡M 1-2 /¿"./ -- r, ~~/ .' .~~ -+- '7' ~.- :v " þ-$ ON' T (" "' ~ Å~ - ¡ "" "^ y þ' T'n " ~ " , I..... " I.. ~ .-;7. I::=:J 1-2 i":,P-¡':-': I . a"?S 'tf:.~ {< >":'1/-.. ~~ w- ¿. i----=1 ,.--J .:f!.1. E' ~ ~"~. 1-'11. II 0 '" - - I-tft ~ j'- : H N- '" Y' 1 ,. 'û"" .~ .. ~ / /<:) !\\ \.?':: 7""-. ~ rsu ~J.l1 :}=, \~~ '7Yf '(' + J' M· - '1C1< ...~ CL" .J.!::; -t·-= Jt::1 \"V<?~;~I- LIt::~ÞN"'" ~L.I 'III ~ ~ f/h I I t1l" IT îf""]TT1"'<" ...~ ~ ¡'G' - ß C-I .. \ 'L' ~ I cs. 0 \ ~~ \ ÞG ~ L c-' AG C-I / / \ \.~~ I. I 'j I ~ ~~'ß'7~ 'J (~Æ- ,/b', · R-2~. ) . . 7::1.. ~. ,¡"".n' " .~ 1 - c-, -[).. . ' ~. ,.,., ,. ....., ~ ~. R-7'" , ~ -:;....., ~ ~,I U J "., AG ~~LT1ll\\~ '\ \ - f:l1 · I' ."í'~ ,,- 0' ~ ~_"""'\ rll-! C-2 - ,....., 'H 1/61 "" fiit \.'¡:: ~~ ~~ '1_ E::I5:2 L - ~ì~: .J-I iiii;;ö; .D I ~ m-R-i - ...: 't"fUI , II r, ~- r. UI R-3 I- uTi ~ ., L....' b 1-;' C·2 1:.......... - . - - AG ~l!3t J,'4.ìS R-2 nT' '= i- C-I -- - - L.... C·I - - - =:=J - I - -.... ! ~ >--,-=~ ~~ß---; Y' I :: .<~ _ t:= D. '- -- - ~ -== R-2 1118 - - - - I t-21 - I 25~ --- - f--~ - - ~~ ~ -- -- ~'-- - '- _ ~ _ :--IL ~_ --L ---' _ f-- - AG - - '- ~ L.... -- .........." .- :.;¡ .=a¡¡, ~ J- ~ I....-.- n ,L- - _I - - lJl~ ~ -4 ... -- . . , 'I Page 3 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 ( ( '- there were two hat needs to be changed already similar ones Chairman Bowen street since e Mr. Long said he would get with the owner and make the changes. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-33 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 4. PS 85-35 Request of Alan W. Hamm, Inc. for final plat of Briarwood Estates, Section 6. Mark Long, Engineer, came forward. '- Chairman Bowen said the proposed alignment of Holiday Lane has been accepted by the City Staff and requests additional right-of-way be acquired for the alignment so it will connect to the street"Plumwood". Mr. Long said Mr. Hamm would have to address that. Alan Hamm came forward. He said he had contacted Mr. & Mrs. Griffin who have agreed to the alignment worked out by Mr. Long. He said he asked if they would agree to dedicate the right-of-way and also asked them if he could purchase the right-of-way, but they did not agree. Mr. Hamm said they would try again. PS 85-35 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 85-35 and if they can not come up with the right-of-way, he feels the City Council should use their authority and go ahead and approve it. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. "-- ( (,I) . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. ',- CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 5, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-847, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BRIARWOOD ESTAfES, BLOCKS 14 AND 15, FINAL PLAT, PS 85 - 35, GRID MAP 150, 59' ~ We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 This plan indicates that the future alignment of Holiday Lane will pass through the southwest corner of the proposed plat. Holiday Lane is shown to curve northwestward from its intersection with the southwest corner of the plat across the contiguous F.E. Griffin property. This curved alignment is not consistent with the alignment shown on the Thoroughfare Master Plan. We would request that the developer explain his reasons for proposing this particular alignment and show how it would extend northward across Starnes Road and ultimately to Bursey Road. 2 We would note that this section of Holiday Lane is designated as an M4U Thoroughfare. A minimum lO-foot wide right-of-way width is required along with a 49-foot BIB pavement width. The developer is responsible for obtaining the full right-of-way width for the section of Holiday Lane which would be adjacent to his property in ,accordance with Subdivision Ordinance requirements. 3 The developer should pay his prorata share of future paving improvements on Holiday Lane or construct such improvements at this time. Detailed plans and profiles of the future Holiday Lane alignment should be submitted for review. 4 The existing and proposed right-of-way width of Starnes Road should be noted on the plat. Starnes Road is designated as an M4U Thoroughfare and the same right-of-way and pavement width requirements as Holiday Lane would apply along with requirements for obtaining all adjacent right-of-way for future widening, escrow, construction plan submittal, etc. - 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 , ( Subdivision Review Letter continued ( BRIARWOOD ESTATES -- 5 The developer's engineer should verify that 100-year drainage capacity is provided in the proposed street within the building setback lines. Cross-sections and calculations should be provided. 6 The proposed 6-inch water line in Holiday Lane should be changed to an 8-inch water line. 7 We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been provided for this subdivision based on the 500 foot radius requirement for residential zoning. 8 The developer should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 16-inch water line in Starnes Road. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one half of an equivalent 8-inch water line for a total length of 300.29 feet. --- 9 We would recommend that the proposed 6-inch diameter sanitary sewer line extension through this property be upsized to an 8-inch diameter to provide sufficient capacity for future extensions north of Starnes Road, unless the developer's engineer can provide calculations which show that the proposed 6-inch line has sufficient capacity to provide service for the full tributary drainage area based on a minimum of 9.5 people per acre, 100 gallons/capita/day, peaking factor determined by Harmons coefficient, infiltration-inflow allowance of 1500 gallons per acre per day, and if approved by the Public Works Department. 10 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in, writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements ~s written in the regulatory codes. ~ve any questions. -~ R H D. , P. . RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '- June 5, 1985 PS 85 - 35 PAGE 2 f ' 1 (' r OweC D. Long and AssociateC Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS June 17, 1985 - Mrs. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Briarwood Estates, Block 14 & 15 Final Plat PS 85 - 35, Grid Map '50, 59' '- Dear:Mrs. Cavlert: We have received the City Engineer's (Mr. Richard Albin, P.E.) letter dated June 5, 1985, pertaining to the aboved referenced addition and have the following comments: 1. The developer has talked to Mr. & Mrs. F. E. Griffin and they prefer the alignment of Holiday Lane to go in front of their house, instead of in the rear as it would if the projection was due north. We are enclosing a drawing showing how this aligment could extend northward across Starnes Road and ultimatèly to Bursey Road. 2. The Right-of-Way width for Holiday Lane will transition fron 68' wide to 70' wide thru the curve to the west. 3. The developer proposes to build his half of Holiday Lane as shown, if this alignment is accepted by the city. 4. The Right-of-Way width of Starnes Road will be shown on the Final Plat and the developer will escrow his share of the con- struction cost at that time. 5. The 100-year drainage capacity will be verified and will be shown on the plans. 6. The water line in Holiday Lane will be ";ppsized to an 8 inch line. 7. The fire hydrant coverage will be shown on the plans. 8. Statement of City policy on water line pro-rata. '- 1615 Precinct line Road - Suite 106 I Hurst, Texas 76053 I Phone (817) 281-8121 } " '- - .--. '- ... Mrs. Wanda calver± - letter , June 17 t 1985 ( 9. After discussing the upsizing of this line with Mr. Albint it was determined that a 6 inch sewer line was sufficient to provide the capacity needed at this location. 10. Statement of City policy of all city requirements. SincerelYt ð~ f) /~ Owen D. Longt P.E. ., . Consulting Engineer ODL/am encl. cc: Mr. Alan Hamm '!::. ~ b. ~ i..,. b.V i..,. L.. L". I L" L" f I b. .... i0 I '"- L ',- \ --..........- j .--.---. --_··..h. if 0 '. '\ ' . , ....'. ~ 0 it .; , I " . " ' ./ . ~ , \... --,., , 0 .¿- ~_..2-': ." ~ I' -.J, -- --, ~ ._-- --.-- .... Il,n o !¡:! l_J -1 ! ¡ , ;1 t 1 ' , , . .. , '\ '. ~ )\, '.. \ : . \ '. .... '. , . . ... . r j" ~ I' \ .. I .¡ I'~"_ i ; "' oJ èJ, I J'i '> )~:. · ;"--D'-~~2> r,~::'8{ '¡ \- , 1-0· I ¿ ,~ , , '/ . I r; " , .; ~ ,- .J' ì..L¡ . ':,' ¡ '~ì,21 '~:1 . - '. , x, \ \ . , ~--.._....~l:!: L' L L L í '- L L I .~ L L L L L L I L- L r L L'L I L CITY OF NORTH RICHLANDHILl.S Planning andOavelopaerit Department: 7/22/85 Councif Meeting Date: PS 85-41 Agenda Number: Subject: Plat This application is.p;resented.f,or Final Plat consideiationof Eden Meadow Estates. The property is located ontbe:eas1: side of Eden Road ònthe north side of the St. Louis and Southwestern· Ra,tlR9&4. '. The tract is z01'1ec!~R';'2· Sinsle Family. The purpose for the plat is to de'Velop the ,property into Single Family lots in compliance with the R-2 zoning. the Planning and (1) The design . for the concrete lined chal1nel suba1tt.'d with the plat did not agree with the crit ' in'tJ\eMå_ter Drainage Plan. The a9plicant' s Engineer was to consult with the City ïineertoresolve the1rdifferences. . c. .: (2) The 'applicf111tsbave áþeèdto dedicate the necessary right of way for the improvement of Eden Road toa, lane collector statu.. 'However, they should also be required to escrow funds fo the'future improvement of the street. RECOMMENDATION: The'lanníng'ánd Zoning Commission ,approved the Final Plat of Eden Meadow Estates witht!J.e,stipulation that the Engineer's comments especially on the drainage channel be com¡>lied with. ~ Finance Review Acet. N,umber Sufficient Fund8Avallable Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) gpe; lAg eu;;~' ~ . .ý} (/ ..P . ~ . ~ ¡:i\ . F~«\r.I ~ 'tDeP en! Head Slgneture . City Manager -~ 'CITYCOUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director 1 Page 1 of .. p..-.y.......o "- '. ~§.~/$ R-O. , -i3 I I JJLJ I::i 1 C.2 ¡ 't 0- " ,,' __ 1""'0J '. ~. _ ~ ~, 'R-3- ='- c,^ H" :::,-,I.-L ~ c ,. p 2000 -'ïl- ~...,...,_ ~ ->.. / I _ ,_ P'''''''' 1=,' 'I:: '- >- 0;;::;: = ;¡""'I IT ''fH''t - AG I ':, ~ ;0- , , "- ' ~~ _, ,; ,.,J ¡;;r . ,...., r ' ~ j,~ ..' ' t: -' ..., _ ,'" ~ -J''j= · , , r~~",.,,----t:fï::-- h Y.J... ~- r'~ . 4-:..' ! '-"- _ :¡'~ ,oJP ,;"t:;Lk---I;lP;:1 ~ T "{" "IC:\ i ~ AG --' "" /1 T I H ~ --4--il] R- ~ = dJ ~ ,J, _, ,_-r1 ~ · "' IIJJ1ITK" 1- LR I t:I :Tfrj-~. - -1'1'1 - - \ ~ t::F ;- ~. AG UJ C-' 1=1;;t±±:I-LL ,lll, I I \ 'Þ='~ '<r -.~ Iltl~ 'vt-,p< ..... C1 .T~-::r:~ Z",Jm '" ....- :~~LIiliHlfrlliJ - -, -. 1\ ~:/. ~ ." --I:::¡ '" _ crvy/-r:--:\ kt ~g:w 1 I" t. .. -rt ~ ~ ~ _>--'~ '.t'. II JJ I " 1 _~-vµ L _." C-I 1 .11 "'" TTJAl'~..;«I';'1tW .. ~ 0/ C-' n_ rs ~,-" ~ ~/ ::I L...:;¡ '[ / ' E:- ' n .;D-':;: AG ~ ~ ..,.. ""'~ y -<,y ~~ >-1: -"§r:+-]C~---+-.L _ L r '0-:.' l' r l·--iS "7,B.1 /-'Ø. )('.\!!(~~ J ._J --11 / " / /¿~-:yo ~11- ¡:::¡ rI 1::r..' \" v ðß~' .->;i y? "-Lr IT =r L---,", '- " l/ r. ¡ - 11 \ , .;;:- '!G -:?7 -KY ~~ x' ~ - :J r1 " ~ ~...../'j."'>: \: lli: II 11/ Aiii I /~ P-I 'r;-I-Ht:::i::j'5 fT11 II 1- 11? ill IiI ,¡.!.!dl III ,IV 1 I' _ R-2 ,'4i.,.' <--T I " ~ - ~fiSO;~ñ,1/ w /h~;rJrO>.L~~8 ' l "C-' / ""','" >- r: rr rvC ~I... Ì- . _ _ ~ . = ,..., m L'" ..... I I R-2 ... r- tl llly $r'::-- : ' 'T ~) - ... "l"'1:'" '"'"'-- r IOU' 1"-- , II h" h ;.:¡ P 'UI I "T1"" ~~~ l. >-i, ' '- - \ --= - L,----' _ W~ '..--2 /' L I ,r:-r-m C ' 1'...... ., ",-" - R-2 lß:;2'ii74 , _ ........ /~ .~~L .\1. T l \..L . =-R-2 ::J!~ _ ~ Gr' ~ r-2 . ;eHEJ:f! :.. :¡ \\f'-- /:¡b;'-: h!'-',7T' - - ! .:.lilI'''' V -:::... _... ,~ti " :. IT; ~f]:J ìH I r "'7-M F ~ ~,L/ . L I ., 11 l'i.:¡t2 I : 'I T .1 [;::. l rl :::f::f ::¡~t~t~\'\ \ I!: /.v 1 AG- Il. --- T :!IT1 -~ ~ __ 'rs'S". . oW ,¡ ,,¡""', - . . ,_, ."...n. n ' _ PS~.-.~ ð~l:" Ii" _. _. - //-,< ~ -', ~...r .! " -I =:j I_ 2 J ¡¡>;.- R- 2 · ..:..i- =J - - ""', --I ,-1 ,~_,. '60Ò 1 L - ,R -~, .it 0:; :::' t: J-tft. =rn_~.J ,,~.~ :j '" R-2 ~ ~_ J~~/7::t II I --I- R-'- ~ -::A...J; ~..J -I I T - Il[' fi êL -::1. MIl ~L .;. , R-2-IJ ill " II I " -ÂC"'š. 0 h c- AG "" ).Gl'P: 1-' =: =< R-I --i 11 " \ I --i =1 1--'_ _ .P. ;1 ~= - ,'" I' - r- T ~_~II ~I~II~ ~~J~T,~,;:qF1 i ;-;r1 f-- I / I u... JL ¡>-t 0,\.\S:1R R-3 '--.1 I''"~~ r R-2 \\ ~ .~ " II --:;1\ 7 c-, $iv' ). I , t ~ IÞ ,co, R-7- _ y : I v L ~ · ., AG \ \ AG ~ 1 ,I W R-3 \ '-- §¡1 - t - \ ' . \ 1- _ I \ -'-'F --.. " .F.' I \ I , I ) I I I I I I I I I I I .. . a ' ~III //~ ~// - -III . -, I 1 V A L I - --.... I-I .. '- I ìTT1 I-I Page 4 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 ( '-. 5. PS 85-39 - "-- 6. PS 85-41 PS 85-41 APPROVED '......... ( Request of R.G.A. Development Corp. for preliminary plat of Fair Oaks Estates, 2nd Filing. Mark Long, Engineer, came rding the "open-end" Bursey Cour , Mr. Royston states it should be designed to the regular size 0 a cuI de sac. Chairman Bowe also stated there are names of st ets which are similar to ones we a eady have that need. to be changed said they would take care of Mr. Tucker asked if they were working with the City Engineer regarding to the eastern boundary. Owen D. Long, Engineer, came forward. He said if the land were to go Commercial later, he would not want to agree to a concrete drainage ditch, but if it goes residential, they will take care of it on the final plans. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 85~39 subject to the Engineer's comments being satisfied by the time of final platting. Mr. Schwinger said he would second the motion and include changing the street names. This motion carried 5-0. Request of Marcus H. Roberson for final plat of Eden Meadow Estates. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-41. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash. Scott Steward, Levitt Engineers, came forward. He said he requests approval subject to working the problem out with the City Staff. Page 5 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 '--.. 7. PZ 85-58 ~ '-- / // >/ --- / //> ( ( Chairman Bowen said it will be worked out before it is put on a City Council agenda. The motion carried 5-0. Request of D. S. Byrd to rezone Lot 3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, from its present classification of C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos (with restrictions) to C-2-Specif c Use-Sale of Used Autos. This p. operty is located on the south side Maplewood Drive at Grapevi Chairman Bowen opened t e Public Hearing and called fo those wishing to speak in favor this request to please come forw Chairman Bow said the restrictions were: a tdoor lighting, no cars older two years, and hours from 8 to 5. e Byrd came forward. He said ere were only two restrictions they are requesting to be lifted: the lighting, he said they need to keep down thefts, and the hours, they request the same as their competitors. Chairman Bowen asked if he did not wish the restriction removed regarding the age of the cars, two years old. Mr. Byrd said they could live with that. Mr. Schwinger asked if there were other businesses adjacent to them that have later hours. Mr. Byrd stated there were. Mr. Schwinger asked if there would be complaints from the residents on Maplewood about the lights. ( JOHN E. LEVITl lNGINEERS r ENGINEERS · PLANNERS 3921 VANCE ROAD · FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 . 284-0981 ,-. June 20, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Rich1and Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills. Texas 76118 Attn: Mrs. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator Re: FINAL PLAT EDEN MEADOWS ADDITION Dear Mrs. Calvert: In reference to the City Engineers's letter dated June 18, 1985, we offer the following comments: 1. No exceptions taken. The plans will be revised to show a concrete lined - '- overflow swale in this area prior to submission to the City Council. 2. We would refer the Commission to the City Engineer's letter dated January 22, 1985, Comment No.4, granting tentative approval for the concrete lined channel design. As we are not in receipt of the mentioned Drainage Master Plan, we are not able to evaluate this request at this time. We also fail to understand the reasoning that our clients were not made aware of any potential problem until this time. Our design is based upon prior drainage information which had been approved and accepted by the City. 3. No exceptions taken. The plan and profile requested is being prepared at this time and will be submitted with the Engineering Plans prior to submission to the City Council. 4. No exceptions taken. 5. We would refer the Commission to their action granting approval of the name EDEN MEADOW ESTATES for the Preliminary Plat, and are requesting that the name be accepted as submitted. 6. No exceptions taken. The final plat will be revised to reflect the additional right-of-way dedication. '-- ----_.._--.- ( r ~ \'-- Mrs. Wanda Calvert June 20, 1985 Page 2 7. The City Engineer's letter dated January 22, 1985 requested an additonal manhole at the intersection of Jason Court and Eden Road for the future extension of the sanitary sewer system which has been provided. We feel that the proposed clean-out will be adequate to serve the 1.29 acre tract directly south of Mr. Roberson's tract. 8. The area in question is the rear portion of Lot 14. As was previously stated in our letter dated February 18, 1985, this area lies within the 50' drainage and utility easement such that no structure could be built in the area due to the proposed concrete line drainage channel. We feel that this problem had been worked out in a meeting with the Planning and Zoning Commission wherein'we agreed to construct the proposed cul-de-sacs with a 45' pavement radius in lieu of moving the fire hydrant locations. 9. Water services are not presently located in an easement, but are in the City dedicated parkway. 10. No objections taken. The plans will be revised to reflect the existing ten inch (l 0") sani tary sewer. 11. No exceptions taken. ~ '- 12. No exceptions taken. We trust that these comments are sufficient to have our request for Final Plat placed upon the agenda for the next regularly scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, Thursday, June 27, 1985. Should you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC. Scott Stewart '- ( ( . KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. "- CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 18, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills. Texas 76118 Re: 3-945A CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS EDEN EADOW ESTATES ADDTION, LOTS 1-35 BLOCK 1, FINAL PLAT, PS 85 - 41, GRID MAP 62 --'-- We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 In accordance with the provisions of the new drainage requirements in the Subdivision Ordinance, the developer is required to concrete line the overflow swale above the proposed storm drain between lots 13 and 14. Also, 100-year capacity should be provided in all streets between the building lot lines. Cross sections and calculations should be provided as required to verify compliance with these requirements. ,-. 2 The results of the recently completed Drainage Master Plan indicate that the proposed concrete channel located on Little Bear Tributary LB-3 does not have sufficient capacity to handle the 100-year discharge based on discharge values furnished by the Corps of Engineers. The Corps existing 100-year discharge in the vicinity of this proposed development is 876 cfs. The ultimate expected discharge is 1,133 cfs, which is about a 3D-percent increase over the existing discnarge computed when the tributary area was less developed than it is now. The recommended channel size for this reach is a 15-foot bottom, with 1.5:1 side slopes, 3-foot deep (with 1 foot freeboard) and 3D-foot wide at the top based on an approximate flowline of 0.75-percent. The developer is proposing a 7-foot bottom channel, with 3:1 side slopes, 2.3-feet deep and 20.8-feet wide at the top based on a 100-year discharge of 455.09 cfs and a flowline of 1.00-percent grade. Using the 1,133 cfs discharge, the normal depth of flow in the 7-foot bottom channel would be about 3.48 feet. We would recommend that the proposed concrete channel liner depth be increased to 4 feet with a 1 foot freeboard above that depth. We would note that because the downstream channel had not been sized to handle the new 100-year discharge values computed by the Corps of Engineers, backwater effects from the downstream channel will still cause a portion of this proposed development is remain in the 100-year flood plain. Therefore, we would recommend that the minimum finished floor elevations on lots 12, 13, 14, and 15 be at least 633.5 based on the existing 100-year flood elevation of about 632 at the north railroad right-of-way line. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ( ( EDEN MEADOW ESTATES ADDTION Subdivision Review Letter continued - 3 A plan and profile of the proposed concrete channel improvements should be included in the final construction plans based on the recommended channel dimensions noted above. - -- 4 The surveyor's certification should be affixed to the plat. 5 Since this proposed plat is contiguous with the "Eden Addition", we would recommend that the subdivision name be changed from "Eden Meadow Estates Addition" to the "Eden Addition" and the lot and block numbers revised accordingly. 6 The new Thoroughfare Plan proposes Eden Road to be designated as a C4U Collector with a minimum 68-foot right-of-way width and a 49-foot BIB width. This plat has dedicated 28.51 to 28.57-feet for their half of this street. The developer should be required to dedicate an additional 5.5-feet for the right-of-way to provide 34-feet for their half of the road. Technically, the Subdivision Ordinance states that the developer could be required to acquire the additional right-of-way on the opposite side of the street in addition to his own dedication if you so direct. If you choose to waive this provision, then we would suggest that it be covered in the City-Developer agreement to avoid future problems. The owner should be required to ecrow his prorata share of the future construction of Eden Road or construct such improvements himself. Detailed plans and profiles of any such thoroughfare construction should be provided for review. 7 We would suggest that the proposed sanitary sewer line designated on the plans as Line 1.1 be terminated with a manhole in lieu of a clean-out, and a stub-out be constructed at the end of the line to facilitate future extensions. Also, we would request that the grade on the segment of this line from Station 6+8.94 to Station 8+13.4 be flattened somewhat and the flowline at Station 8+13.4 be lowered to provide 4 to 5 feet of cover over the pipe as required for future extensions to serve off-site areas. 8 We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been provided for this addition based on the 500 foot radius requirement for residential zoning. We would suggest the fire hydrant on Jason Court be moved to the east and another fire hydrant added to the west on the corner of Eden Road. 9 Water services should not be located on easements. Two single services should be used to serve lots 28 and 29 of block 1 in lieu of the proposed double service. The single service between lots 24 and 23 should be moved closer to the center of lot 23. 10 The size of the existing sanitary sewer line (IO-inch) located along the east side of this proposed development should be noted on the plans. -- June 18, 1985 PS 85 - 41 PAGE 2 ( Subdivision Review Letter continued ( EDEN MEADOW ESTATES ADDTION - 11 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing a-inch water line in Eden Road. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of the existing line for a total length of 329.5 feet. Also, the developer should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 10-inch sewer line located along the east side of this proposed development. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one half of an equivalent 8-inch line for a total length of 229.04 feet. 12 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific . variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~I48-W. ~ - '- RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '- June 18, 1985 PS 85 - 41 PAGE 3 , ¡ L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning andD,vel~pmentCoûn(;lfMeeting Date: 7/22/85 lsUbject: Plat Application . LÔ~$ .~~{~1'\d 2R, Blocki2.'~~ Agenda Number: PS 85-42 LOt:S 4 and 5. itJ,.ock13)sn-ÒwHe1gllt:s Nort:b.:~.~'t.$.t)n ~ ¡ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Finance Revléw L Source of Funds: Acc".~~!Rl!tì T . .~~~~=~t .. .-4..i>Z ..... SUfffClent~~>Avålläbl. ~L~&~;. .~"ito~r L·. . ......C1TYCOUNCIL ACTION/TEM This replat application i~/Pt"éŠ.~~.~i}før considerationiio(~þ~s .1Ra~d 2R, Block 2. and Lots 4 and 5, Block 13Sn~ l!e~gbt...N.o,~th Addition. Tñ~."~Go.perty . is located on the north side of Loop 820e.~t('Qf.Rufe Snow Drive. The trac;~..i~'I;'ezo~ed C-l Commercial. The purpose for the pro"(J~edreplatis to dedicate thene(;es~~'.tY'utility easements and fire lanes requiredto.e~ethe existing and proposecii~YtJ.lopmeJ1ton the site. There is currently a Wal-Mart.st.oreup.c:ier construction on Lot. 21.. The Planning and Zoning~1sl'~0tJ.i.Pp:';-oved the Rep1.åt of Lôts lRand 2R. Block 2 and Lots 4 and 5, Blockl3 SnO'tJl!eigbtsNorth Addition. "... . finance Director Page 1 of 1 ~~~ ' ~-~ ì( ~ m- \~..;~t8T~ ' 'Tmm" I \-2 ~ t''Lr,:~/,~. . ,¡çm'"&rl ~~ T i";'~" J \ I ¡::;;~ rr ,ITT! --., 1:::::.' ,j~ §j ~-".,., .... \'1 ~li~T~~~ t' Tr~... em , ,., ,/ " "w.y.. ' TI I ,,' ";:" ,"l I " .. JW!.. -n: '~E. . ~ .':{ ~ ~ .. ' yo .)..,-?f 1- ~_ " '" ,íTT : I 1 J. ' . . '$ ~,'~:A ~ !=La; >-+- ~~ - c;,,,y> ~ '!- To ~ I- Ù \7.... \: 0\. ,-' '-~ ~ ,.' 7~. BEE,~: >-\~:~Yr--.;;C-I --ii I--.. \~ -r...y p\~~ '-=': . ~. '-f-'r. 1-- [II t::::~~'t'.Á~'.J:" ,....·v J 'n;~\~ \~~v¡= , , . -<.,. '- 1-: \ ~ \ , , k'< , '- r . ~H :'-1/ -'Ç-: V t t.:, ).... ~ Q þ~ )-- r;:-"-= 1 D- . " , \'i¡J;." I· I .< it '<:ç::. '-~~~ ~ ." ..,..... ,." , :;. h.rTì. f ncp,. . ..¡:::::U...I .l.~~ + I ~ I f3;..6-: ....; :d). ~ ~ :<;::: ¡: ,;'~S'2!5 iT I~I :.d + ~-'::! ~ 3.0..-,.::(. r~" : . ~1.\ ~ ,",\ }< ,Y.) Y' ..... "OLlSTRI~ I~'EP~- . "t-::í:::J j:::/ >.. ~1 -- W......¡ar - ~ \ ~ ~ ..A<f:...~ - ....,..,~::_~"...,,&8:. R-7-MF II3=;~it±' . .. $~. ~ ~~. V)~ ~ ~.~~~/ HJ= ~ 1I"§§c: +H-i .' II, n=, I ~ .W>: "',_ ..0 IEb ¡:µ cF R-':! ~:t::;TT :-ö \-J-:: .' If I iI.· -f: I ' , ' C-I '''_I 1If- : r ì :1'1 'I. II . ·~./L , [V?'7"MF...... ç:::s:TII I' - , iii "J J..,1]11 '\ : /. >:?T 1\-1 lid-I J'I!IIII·~ (~ e-I '~ C-2!\ þJf~c-~':- "~~7-M' ~ e- ~ ~f.::. -?/\ . ~. "~Ir-\~ / "" ~ '-'- 0"'~/ , . " :, 112 ~~ c:u_e 'I--~' ~~~~q \, .~:..\.~~~.~\ t-- 1097i I -~ -~ ~:\ '. ~....... l ' -'\ ""3 c-t·su· ~ '- t' !LJ ~/ V" \ R-2 \ I r I :::' - """ I I [ -- : LL ":f! 0 ... \ F.P. \ )\ r . I¡-,- , <-- - '-"'+', II.: "'--0'..1 I . - ._ ti ¡If.':," ~~ y ~. ~...,,,:... '\~, Y. ~. ~ -2 .o":~'"1S if, Q,-o ... ~ ~ l ! 7 .~, ~'Ú i I j.: I,U'. tt C-2 [š"j:f === gü2; I ----{./ . C\' f=' F- , 1.11 r ¡ , qu' C-2 ~.l/" -' ¡ I t Tl \ I "f . i . ¡ t. .. ,'" IP'. ¡ ."..... . "~ II II. l.~ I ¡;;d I..--::; ,. ~ ..7.... ,;;::.. 1\ LJ.j LJ."t ~ T I i _, ;:.~,! 6 /~ ~'I::~"" U' b,¡ II. -w 'i'_ . ---:: ..~ JL1 I ~"'" ~/ II - , . -+= ± L-_ \~pN ... U- j:~t-..~. n ~ LR S,U." ...-., ............... . _ T 1-1-1 I..,..:. ~ ~ j¿- .. , ' I I J ~~i ¡ ~1l IR-~, --, ~~~~~\~'.; l~_ - R. ~=1' i~ ~~ I.J.!.. I LR -r:il T I I II I I I i 7~ ~~ "") ~ì i- n 1 I I . Ie[, ~'U.U ì:::::'-- _____...... ~ J .'7 R~ ~, \ I~~r f-Ì-, I I 'T In" !{T[V'!", " I " -'(1; -=t-., "., " t:F , = ::i= 1 Y H , I-+JIJ. 'I'i', -"f ~""-', '- t!' "', F µ.- :¡µ 'iI' 'I-,Ll 'I J- c;.:, t..... Y ~ ""'- , .......... ,\ , J -. 1'[ ~~. [::, -7-. --'-' ,. T , ,_, . \ " I 'I ~.7 I r \ f " y r",,' ~ I I I \ L- Ji. 1 \ ~ n...J.- \'{~"", I T I I III \, J"i+I \-rt-~ i3:' swow ---t- ~ .! q " ....:. ¡ "'- It('..u I--t ~: ! T i ': -.l gJ' ~ [L[M. ~ r ¡- f- ~ '-- ,. ., I I 'n. I _ I ............. - - .- - 2 . - 1?1 r iT - ----"l _-1 -:r ---< '( ., f- 1-'\1 '1./ 1-~1= ~ ~ï 1 I T"--. k - 1\ C-2 1017 ~ ~t: , t- JfC)lltTH 'tlCHLANO t;J:f:j """'~ NR ( ( "-- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, JULY 11, 1985 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to orde Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7' P. " ROLL CALL Alt. Member Dir. Planning & Dev. P & Z Coordinator Don Bowen John Schwinger George Tucker Mark Wood Joe Hallford Richard Royston Wanda Calvert ABSENT: Marjorie Nash 1. PS 85-42 Request of The Cambridge Company for replat of Lots lR & 2R, Block 2, and Lots 4 & 5, Block 13, Snow Heights North Addition. ,--. PS 85-42 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-42. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 2. PZ 85-62 Request of Growth Investors, Inc. rezone Lots 12 thru 22, Block 13, 1 thru 5, Block 14, & Lots 1 thr Block, 11, Windcrest Addition, om their present classificat of R-2 (Single Family) to R-4 (Separate Ownership Duplex). is property is located on both des of Starnes Road and bounded the north by Maroaks Additio '-- irman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mike Stephens, 1550 Norwood, Hurst, came forward. He presented pictures to the Commission. He said he was requesting to change single family detached to single family attached. Mr. Stephens stated there were 43 lots north of Starnes that abuts duplex zoning. co { FA PEARCE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers '-- June 26, 1985 O.N. 84-051 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-929, City of North Richland Hills Replat, PS 85-42 Grid Map 121 In response to the review by Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc., letter dated 6-18-85, we have made the following changes: .' 1. 2. 3. -- 4. 5. '- The subdivision name has been changed from "Northwood Plaza Joint Venture" to "Snow Heights North Addition". The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification have been fully executed. The phone number of the owner is now shown on the plat. The Surveyor's seal and signature is affixed to the plat. The existing zoning for this development is noted on the plat. 6. The proposed 6-inch sanitary sewer line shown on sheet no. 2.6 has been upsized to be an 8-inch line. We hereby submit to you fifteen (15) plats to be considered for final approval and subsequent filing of same. Please call if we may be of further assistance in this matter. Very Truly Yours, PEARCE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. lJ~.k.J~;LD~c1?3A~___________ KIMBERLY DICKËRSON 1820 HWY 35E . SUITE 102 . CARROLL TON, TEXAS 75006 . 214/245-3568 '-.- 2 - 3 4 5 6 7 8 ( " . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 18, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NORTHWOOD PLAZA JOINT VENTURE, LOTS 1, lA, 2, 3 BLOCK 2, REPLAT, PS 85 - 42, GRID MAP 121 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Since this proposed plat is contiguous with the "Snow Heights North Addition", we would recommend that the subdivision name be changed from "Northwood Plaza Joint Venture Addition" to the "Snow Heights North Additon" and lot and block numbers revised accordingly. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. The phone number of the owner should be noted on the plat. A surveyor's seal and signature should be affixed to the plat. The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat. The proposed 6-inch sanitary sewer line shown on sheet no. 2.6 should be up~ized to an 8-inch line as required for commercial zoning. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ( ( NORTHwuud PLAZA JOINT VENTURE Subdivision Review Letter continued ~ Please call if you have any questions. Oi f W ~ RIC~=P.E. . RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development -- June 18, 1985 PS 85 - 42 PAGE 2 ( ( -- Mr. R. S. Williams TESCO Region Engr. Supervisor P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 85-42 Snow Heights North Addition, Block 2, Lots 1 & 2 Address or Location: north of N. E. Loop 820, south of Lewis Drive Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert. Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than June 20, 1985. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. ---- v Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: ---rÉSCQ W, L~ NEEd A j) D J T I "^' A L {:; /-l S E 11 E IV ìs. /-f ì TAe-H t:-IJ PL /-1-1 ¡:; 5 c::; rI 0 ~ AI ItV ZeD () N Tr-IE CITY: DATE: June 11, 1985 SIGNATURE ¿~. Q. ~01.-li? E ..ú~ (J~ TESCO: DATE: Ct, -I\-- 8') SIGNATURE , L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Request 7/22/85 L Department: Planning and Develoþ1Îè'rit r L Subject: SO 85-10 Agenda Number: L L L ',":-_ " ó" The National Advertising (::01Iipany. - J!iJ,has made applicatioJ,\,to the Building Department for erection of a Billboát'd Sign to bé:located on the sc:Jq-thside of IH Loop 820 within the rtght of way oftheS~t.LOu.i8' SoUthwestern Rail Roàa.~This sign is to replace an existing non-conforming. .t¡n at the same location. The pl,"opose-d sign will conform to all the criteria of the sign 0 '.1:nan~e as to size, height,~detc. The locat~on is adjacent to the westerncityb" ary and does conform to the spacing criteria in the current ordinance. . RECOMMENDATION: It is r~oDII..ì1de4 that the City Counetl.approve tbe application of National Advertising Compåny.';"3H for installation of tb...above noted Billboard Sign. I L L L L , L L - i L I I L L ! '- í I \..... Finance Review Acct. Number .. . . Sufficient Funds Avàilable ! L ,L '/ nt He~S'Ôniture. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 National Advertising Company -- 11233 N, Stem mons Freeway Dallas, Texas 75229 214/243-1100 July 2, 1985 3IVI City Secretary City of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Sir or Madam: By means of this letter we are requesting to be placed on the City Council's agenda at their first meeting available to consider our request for a billboard permit upgrading one of our existing displays in your community. Mr. Greg Wheeler of the City Staff has inspected the site and reviewed our application and has found that our request conforms to your ordinances in all respects. '''"-- We sincerely appreciate your assistance in this matter. Yours truly, 21;lø~ ~avid D. Simpson Real Estate Representative DDS:sb '- -- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST PERMIT NUMBER TYPE OF SIGN J3, l....lROAI2D DATEJ;¡flk,:2/ I ¡qÆS' NAME OF APPLICANT/BUSINESS ~nO¡JAL Al\11E"Rl1s"/1\J6; ~~<1~ -.3A1 ADDRESS 1I.Q33 Noflll./ gº"tI:IONs Fi.~I~ 7S'UjP f1," ¡;2cf3-{/()(!j LOCATION OF SIGN ~ S,ffow¡V ON '2DIJ¡N¿' /J11tP~ SfLodt'5.fnait..ÞJ'~{ø0 f2t2 f L;:t SIGN LOCATION ON LOT AS .5lfóä/.A/ ON ZJbm/t.. ZJ,v¡.a//U(Ø. NAME OF CONTRACTOR '11;;.'1 St,iN aMp~N:J 1 INC!-. ADDRESS Ii I;¿F! ~()uT1l P,P£t./Al6~ Eu/...6$S ?~31HONE l.IJ'J-26?- /ssLj WIDTH OF LOT FACING QUALIFYING STREET /~C) I SIGN TAKING UP PARKING SPACE(S) YES ® .;I:- BLOCKING FIRELANES YES 'ÑÕ'if ESTIMATED SIGN VA¡.UE $ /.,s; 000 ~ . 'S-r¡"f/eN~e4. PERMANENT OR BILLBOARD FILING FEE $50.0 + ESTIMATED COST WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURE OR LAND TO WHICH OR ON WHICH THE STRUCTURE IS TO BE ERECTED OR SIGN TO BE PAINTED. NO *************************************************************************** THE UNDERSIGNED AGREE TO CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE SIGN ORDINANCE 111001, 1-24-83, AND OTHER ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, AND ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITI F~~~~Tlyé THIS SIGN. ~ . tØø:Á4--)JRØ2 SIGNATURE OP AP~~ ~. "r;- APPROVED BY .. '/t (/e¡z/l$//L/¡ {<;- ¡1-t DATE SIGNED 0t . 2~~ .5~ APPROVED DATE PLEASE ATTACH ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO THE BACK OF THIS FORM. '-- National Advertising Company '- 11233 N. Stemmons Freeway Dallas, Texas 75229 214/243-1100 6-20-85 3M C¡ ty Counci 1 City of North Richland Hills North Richand Hills, Texas Dear Si rs: We presently have an existing outdoor advertising display on the South side of Loop 820, located on the property of the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad, a subsidiary of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company. At this time we are making application for a sign permit for an outdoor advertising display to improve and upgrade the location we presently have. Upon approval of our re- quest, and prior to the installation of the new display, the existing sign would be removed. The display we propose to erect is an illuminated, 14'x481 double-faced, centermount monopole, 672 sq. ft. in area and 501 in overall height. The proposed sign would be in a "V" configuration to provide for primary viewing from 1-820. It would be located on the east side of the Rail- road's Right-of-Way as shown on the enclosed drawing and would be set back behind the highway right-of-way line and would not project over any public property or right-of-way. The display would be located entirely within 1001 of the freeway boundary line. Our upgraded location would be approximately 2000' from residential zoning or development and is not located anywhere near any public recreation area, public or parochial school, '- -- "- .- City Counci 1 City of North Richland Hills 6-20-85 page 2 Public library or church. The owners and developers of the adjoining property have stated that they intend retail, commercial, or shopping center development of the freeway frontage. The nearest outdoor advertising display is approx- imately 2500' from our proposed location, well in excess of your 1760' standard. Illumination of the display will be of an indirect type and will not face toward any residential building. No flashing or intermittent lights will be used. We also enclose the following information for your use and consideration: A copy of your zoning map, showing the proposed location, a detailed drawing of the site; two sealed engineered blue-line drawings of the proposed display and a letter of consent from the owners of the p rope rty. In conclusion, we find that our display is compatible with proposed development in the area, will not interfere in any way with the orderly development of the city as provided for in the official land use plan and will contribute to the welfare of the city by meeting the needs of local businesses in North Richland Hills for outdoor advertising on Loop 820. As we are also in conformance with every requirement as stated in your sign ordinance #1001, as amended, we ask for approval of our permit request. Sin ce re 1 y you rs , 3M National Advertisin #t~ Real Estate Representative '-- Santa Fe Pacific Realty Corporation 12850 Spurling Drive, Suite 100 Dallas,Texas75230 214/980-7707 June 11, 1985 N. RICHLAND HILLS - National Advertising Company City Council City of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, TX Dear Sirs: This letter is to confirm that the National Advertising Company is currently a lessee of the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, a subsidiary of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company, for the purpose of erecting and maintaining an 8 ft. X 20 ft. outdoor advertising sign on the south side of the intersection of our right of way with Loop 820 in North Richland Hills, Texas, assigned SSW Lease No. 6009. I would be willing to recommend to our management that the lease be upgraded for National Advertising to erect a 50 foot high 14 ft. X 48 ft. monopole outdoor advertising display. '- Should you have any questions, please advise. Yours very truly, ¿./J4 H. G. Walter, Regional Manager Property Management Services HGW:ms '- A Santa Fe Southern Pacific Company -, '- - To Ff. WO(' - - . /LJ~IiCJN OF ;])ISP LA Y ~ ~ ~ tJ * ~ ~ ~~. \. .~ LEGEND : Exhibit "A" aT. LOUIS Sot1l'HWESTERN RAILWAY LINES Near SMITHFIELD. TEXAS Plat of Industrial Lot No. "C" 625. 781¡..R To aCK!OIIIp&ny agreement between St. Louia Southweatem Þilway Company . and MTIœaL ADVERTISING COMPANY Office of Division Engineer Pine Bluff. ArkaMa. r-:;:-::;:':¡:G: - Right of way covered by lease - 100 sq. ft. NOR.mRI~J.,.t..ANb .¡.fiLLS, "'7'tx;1-~. . /-oOP8'20' "- Saale: 1" · 100' July 1967 I L':'- .~.l.__ ., L ~ ...~..~.'. -- .-.'..-- ,~_.-.-.,,_.....-...- - - ..'-..,,; ·I~. . 1:- ~ f ' I ,.. ' . . " . "'-"-'cr' . , ,m 1- J rr"~""'" -"' ~T l' " ! I·· . , '" ~'J" . I. _,' . '.4 'r' I 0. ..<: f.f,¡n·,,: .-'''.- I . " P I '_,,, _ J II ¡ í L- ¡ I .... L ~i¡ \).. ~ ::t r" Cð 0 ~§~ o " ! L l \ \ ¡ L I ¡ ! L i I , I.... f L~ L C I ,. " .. 0 I L ", ~~\',.f. ,~~, "'!}\ . -X ).o'::tji ç , 'J...~,' '., \ "~,,,_, '~f' .".. \.J .~:." . _<"" .-' þ .~~, . .. \.. . 4!t~.. . . "~ft', y".4.:'''', ,,", I. \,~~~.\ ')0 \.~' ~ ...... V / ~ "," ," ,.;1 ~#\, '" -',' ....~t C'.' ..... I 1 ,.> \ \...... ./" \.!( , ....is 10- :; -~~ ,,'\ -,...,.' . ~'~. " 6'" ,," ~\ i 1" , .\ . ~¡ ..\....~"\t\., d'.~ :,( : .J.: ;;c : ~ [ ,\. ''1..' I, .' .; \ I ~ . i j, ill T \f i .-.; ¡ ~ " : ~. ¡ r: : --'. : ~Jr ~. I~[: t.~tt[ :. \ . I I 'L" , ¡ I "L I _~L L ;'. j: +;:~ ~_:_J:l_:.~~-=-:.: . -......-..~.~-.:"_. ·-:--r l' ·---r-....--.--.!r-· '-';'~'- ____ ~_. .. ......._J....-of l t, .. ..- , . ".',1 [~. ¡ I ¡ j . 4~~.. :' ; ,J . I::" " I Z\I ,-...-l _ ':~L .~. !- :' - I ' 'f?!- I F [1 .., . }.'Î . J;;.. , ,~ I . " ',. , ~. . . ., .f.' . " ! ii¡:.,.Á.,i.<¡,: \..~. . 1:.· -f" u1f ~ ¡::- -l,r-l ~- l· - q' ~ ~ > ;1 '. r:~ . ''::r l' , - --~t: f If · - ,,7; 1\', ~~ I .. .... ¡ . - -- -i1 - -- ø I I, "..... J L' I:-=- -:-. --~. ': t" ¡ l JtL' ,;~ ~J I ., . I I '1- ', ....A1 C ~) -, '¡ +T'"J w: ,-: -! ~~lJt:::~.' - .:~ -J l I // "'" ~ . . , . "l -l . , I It ~ L_ ,:,' r- ~ ¡ . b ,---'. ,,-.. I ~ ]':1:,. \' ~ '.~.J _I. [! ..,' :~]J; ! \... - .-' '__Ii' -"1.[ ]'----~..... I J \::?----.. .. i: f"! L- .-~~~r-- ~ ;~~.d~-i . ~ · ([l;~":'l ' ,f.',~~; I C-~:j . ft.' -~! JJ~~--==)I r-~J' \¡ ">:~:ll ",:"'ì/ i0~1L~~~JL<_: .' ~r-~nr" . r!1 .H~ Mil \ " .~ ~ , ~ ~ j o è. ~ r- ~ ~ -\ ~ , ....... ~ o ) 1 A.....C ..... I '" , " (') I N .:''':''.... , ........ :0 I !.II . , \ , '. ~\ ';~ '\ .' '".,\, \ \ -0 ii. , "I\) :JJ I i' 3: ." '~,;' -? ..... - .<\ .:,fF ~ ~ '.".' ~ ~~ - ¡(."~~,, :~ \ , . I "- ....... '. . .', I '" I "-"{~ "'" ~" I 1'm' ~\~......,.~)...... I o'~ . --~~. ~ I 7 ¡ '~" ' o ~ ' ' , ~.' I " ...J I , l f r", ;0. iO , i'" VI C. ,., ¡-H \ " (') I I i_ , _ :1 f:\lfr~: :'.; ,~ . I', t ¡ I I I .. \ I ' " ',. ~:-\l"·~·t··~":·'" ~.. .' IYI.~Q~" ..' :.'. ,~,,(!a>'11 ~~:;;.;.~.,:.;::: : ,~,;,;: ~\ !, f . ' . ~ . 1 ~ ~ . I"'··· 1 - . \ I . ._~,. '. tf.Utio.._,~ . . 1 . . I . " ~., .. . .... , I I. t' . . . . ," t ... ~ . a , " . . . ';' :0 '! 1 < 1 f I ¡('?to . ~.c; ~,,'II'~'" ....',....1 - ',1. ' T , ·"'1 Ylc,.'.l . ;f~ ¿ . __ t,. ,. . t. ., . \ .. 1. , , " . , '. \It; ~ . ..('''00- 10". : ,I ~ J" . I ~. '",1... "\ . \ '~~~I:'~' :.~Þ~·'": ; ·¡t:·~ . . ......,., ..: i~\·'··~'·<·1 ,.,' ;M~~' ....~'"~~ : <." .' r. ::;~,::::: I . ", r"" '" \.> ¡ 'I; . .. r~<o, . 1~ ;'..1., . t ~\. 'I.~~'··~ ~ t·J·. ¡ ; ·t\ .;h . I . I ~~.,.. r"' '" , '.." , Ii :JJ ..:" 3: ." r.~¡ ."1~ :':1 :'raJ r.òbm -:--ð" c ~ r. ':'t'.~ - _.=-.-2iI'.,,:...ç,': !I;'· c t~·=--:·· ..._- P: ,." .... ',*' ,.. , ',,:'';' ....., :"1::0 , '. . / :'0", , ! :, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS L Department: Planning 811.diiJ)é;vèlø,,_nt I L Subject: Street Name Change Linma Lane Ordinance No. 1Z51 Council Meeting Dat~: 7/22/85 Agenda Number: GN 85-68 L The property owners.· ()f~llt:he property along thenortb.s:f.~e<of Linma Lane from Flory Street to ScruggSDriveh,g,vere~ueeted that the n~e~f'the1r street be ch~nged to Daytona. Drive. Theapp.tics.ntsownall.the propertYf'aC~8the.one block street. The south side of the street$sthesideof the.WalkerC()ns~ruct:f.on Compound. RECOMMENDATION:Thel'lan.11.it).8$11.d.~on1ng Commission ree_ended tbat the st1teet name of Linma Lane be changed<to.DaYJ:011.$DJ:'ive. t I L f I -- L f I I L I L , L L ¡ L L L FfnanceReview I Source of Funds: , .Bonds (GO/Rev.) :L0rat'nge~dget·i>i>i r i;2~..P'~~__/~ft.£;'é li .... <. Depart . tHee¡¡!ltgn~t\1f~i ..... ....... .. . ....L OIWMa"aoer ¡ ICIT'Y.ØOf!JNCIL ACTION/rEM ¡ L Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Page 1 or 1 ""'... .,/ . ¡ .,/!. " K,.' '0·: , \.\\ ì <... . ,.(, , - y \) ---- . -" ~ :L-"¡ -' ("', ~~JU ] ( i , \ - : \ I Ji/O i \, ~/ l~tJ . ~......J \, I ~tJ ' I 0,\ ; ~ i -~ A ~~ -. -0 -'~~). ¿ -[] ; " A X)\ '. -.~. \ . .-- -.--------------- Page 6 P & Z Minutes June 27, 1985 ( ( '--- Mr. Byrd said the lighting would shine on the cars, not the neighborhood. Mr. Schwinger asked if would be brighter than Mr. Byrd said '-- Chairman the City Ordinance requires lighting be kept within their undary. airman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition..to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-58 and lift the restrictions of lights and business hours. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Wood voting against. 8. PS 85-47 Consideration of changing the name of the street, Linma Lane, to Daytona Drive. PS 85-47 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-47. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 9. ·PZ 85-40 Consideration of Plan. Council review Chairman Bowen. request f wing Susan Lee C2U. 2. Vance Road-Change from C4U to C2U. 3. Holiday Lane-Question: Is M4u appropriate in areas where development restricts R.O.W. an.d ability to widen paving to 48 ft. C4U to '- '-- Proposed street name change trom Linma St. to Daytona Dr. ~~ Jj 4~t~d ,.~ ¿;J I '-../ -~~ C ~ 12~ ¡jtÚ ~ . ( R~;--t:V':/ øß-. ' ø . ~~æ. Þ/7~~ ? 'L'õl'õCKErr R-o-3iæ... L~5 LABAOIE DR..... no,.., J-12 LAKE CHARLES AVe N. F-II LAKE CHARLES RD. .... F.18 lAKE HAVASUTR ...... E-11 LAKElANO .-........... ß..'3 LAKE LOUISE. .... ..... F.I' LAKE MARIL't'N CT ..... F-I, LAkE MARILYNN DR.... f-I' LAKESJOE ............. F..O WEVIEWC1R......... ',10 ~~~-r~~:::::::::::~: I LAMONDCT··..........0-12 LAMPE DR............... E-7 LANCASHIRE DR ........ H-I LANCE CT ............... E-I "LANOVOR.............. .1-12 LANNY IN '. .................3 LANTANACT ............+-1. LANTANA DR ........... H-1' lAAALN ................ f'5 LARIAT DR .............0.10 LARIAT TER ............0-11 LARK ...-_.............. '-14 LARKSPuR LN.......... H-14 LARRY AVE.. ..... ...... C-'2 LARUE CIA ............. 0.'0 LATHAM OR ....... ..... G~12 LA(JRAST .............. J-10 LAUREL IN............. H.10 LAVERDA OR ...........0-13 LAVOHOR··..··........GoI3 I LAYTON...,. ........... C"2 LAYTON.. ... ...... ..... C.15 LAlY8A:OOKQft........G·S: LAZ'YlANE AD ......... J..O . LEAWSIOE DR .....~.... 8-11 ; LESliE DR............. J-11 I . LEONA LN... ........... 0.14 LEONA S1 .............. 0-'4 L£VINLN............... f'15 lEVI11CT ............... F-a LEWIS. ......... ..........J-8 LEWISDA .,......,......Q-. i I.IlLlANST .............A.I$ , LIMERICK LN....... ......H. LINCOlNSHIRE LN . ... .. 0.7 LlNDACT ..............tc..11 lINDADA ..,..........,. E", LINDSAY LN ............ C-13 LlNMA5T ..............G-I. LINTON ................ F-14 lIPAN TER ............. K.ID LISA MIKE ST............ L.S UTTLE FOSSIL AD...... F'I" LiTTLE RANCH AD ...... tHI LIVINGSTON DR........ L.11 LOLA OR .. ............. Hog LOMAVISTAOR......... F.5 LONOONlN···.........H-11 ¡ LONG AYE E............ A.12 , LONG SOONE OR ....... L-8 LORAINEST·...........C·,.. I LOTUS AVE............. A-I" LOWER ÐIRDVILLE RD.. C~ 18 LOWERy LN ............. .Hi LOWERY RD............ L'16 LUCillE................ E-11 lUTHERCT ............. H-e I LYNDA CT..... ._....... ..J.e LYNOA LN..... .......... .J~II LyNNTER.............. J~111 LYNN DALE DR.......... F... N .:..- 6..,. 'In.. l" .' .... _ ii ';-"._._..__._.,,_ ~ . '!>-t. ~_........ 'a: :I: . ,j. ~ . 'I('! ~¡,O 0 ' ~ œ. !!1\'¡;R~1t1 ..QLIV£II.AV~, :~ \r- \' ~ J1p ..' Cp. t;: wt ;:._, 0 (\ .., . Ui. .... \~ : ::j. ~ ...!..ctl:!ff.!l~! !.._~Pfllil"'.V ~'. ',1ft..... '. 0' i~I:5; ;:, \ ..; .''¡'"''&\~ J ~... '. ~i e' ..'- ¡V1CTOII'" "VII ~., \ '~{ dt;....: :'. iõJ~!I!C~".V.l~W DR CYUND4 SU. -"._ ¡...J< !tr"';', (t)t ~ ~ . CIA ~ ~ ~ i Q 'nOR ,cl ... 0, j ~ z !ë Slli~ ". ...... .a: . BRILU_........'I,.OIl. CJj..··· 7f. ¡ 00 æ' i CIt. Q ~~$g; ¡ ·l9 -~I T....OII.l!! -.TMOII S' ~. TVfimiLÆ Jm... \' .", c Õ Qf.YQ. NSHIRE DII '~!!'L'T g u' ...; '~"'(J , i Z ~¡ n-/L'lltO/l Q!\~ ....Ç.I ~.\, . H&Iqt:lBURG CT ¡"'t~Q/f 4_VE g' ¡ t ~)f¡'~ ¡ . <.. .1. ''''I <.>,:;,,1:', &6"" i ¡æ, ."\ ,~. -..., , C' .. M~'~-' O~ - -. . ~ - ... ¡:E' a: ,. ,¡t- .. ~ I 2' ..( . r .~c<\ z .. t; . a: g..} co iQ~:." .~'" '~ a:." ..~GLutY~.JU!; ~ .1>\:1. ,.... .,. ! Œ<.Jo.. ..~~,,~' ~ Q' ~ !!! ::I; ALLENE MULLENDORF ~:...... :~\ ~. g U.. ...c, El ME~'TAElr..:r: i!!:O' RDI' I' j!. ·1 t ....a:-.' ..: CROSS!~ v'" ,;\'ÏI.. . ..,. US,, i>:\," ,~_,... '. Ct4RTWE~L ST ã :; ~:;; . ~O ~ ... v " ~4 o I . ut ~ t-~ ~ ... "(' , ¡; ¡ HAIINONSON ã RD /fAtlYOHIOH II) g :I: O<-v '" <ì / ,.~~ £ ~ ~ .,,, ~ ~ ~ "!o.,-"'" -:- 0\t.' ~ !!¡ lIH,!,A.H..:, "'O~ \. -:;.9'/ .' . 0,,- :1:. II: ; ~v" '!J<'9. . O~ .~. \ O«Q . '-' Of:jYII D~ ,lj .' 'Ò~ ...4" )' rt" ~ "r" . ....' ¡p~ ~... ~" ~.' " ~'Ir>.~~j .,. ~.... ...' .'9" ~"'. .... 0'" 1 ..I'" 4". ",,~...QQ' -#oßIi. ~ (J 9 a:,.....~. "., MAIII¡ ST o,.··,....¡r a\r:.'f! :( Q ,..; . :if ;¡.... . p. ~ ,.,\\.!!' z !j' ~'- ~ ,~!!ll H... .Z,.... ''o~!'' . "~ .--- , '<:"!IoO ~: !~ g: ..' <f:'" ... . \ os. J.'. ¡J)º¥~!\ ~- i\ \1".':" Q, >1 a::-'~ Q' kJ Q r- ",I ~o'" c"" .I ø~y· 11~ i ~:- BIIOQKjf>1 'ó ;>(¡ i ¡¡I\.OQU..fJ!f: ..,. 'to \' r ~ :if ~,i ~. .u,~. øp.1-~;{t\P!i_ .... ~. ..110lr'i.!'!KA.,fAV¡;.. .~ ~._L_"_'''.--~n~ {I. SCHOOL , If ¡ f I ¡, PROPERTY ~",.., J,1õ ...!Wive¡ ~ S~ rEI R Ie H lA NO 1 ~(I4~~~ti ~ HillS' ¡-.. 6'fZ/ '-..-- 3ROI ~ 6cf 2S- 63 /'7 6;l/3 6 f éJ /, ---.-.-. OODOMRO ..........A-l1 OAIS'tlN ...........1.. DALE HOllOW RD ..... f-11 OALEvlEw fR .... . . ... H.' DALEy AYE ....HII OALFORO. ...........A.I~ DAllAS ..................".. DAMON ................8.'. DANCIR................ J.IJ DANA OR .... £'1' DANA ST ........... .. C.I' DANiEl ."'.,..........J., DÞ.N11EL CT .... ......... J.1 DAYIS ULVD".......... ..J-7 DAVID CT ............... H-I OAYID DR.... '" _.. e.I..."'. DAYIDSON 51 ........,. Q-12 DAWHOA. ....F.II DAYTON ST .. .......... 0.1" OEAVER DR ... ..... ........-1 DEBORAH............... F... DESOAAHLN........;.. J-'2 OEClARATlOfrI .......... E.1 OfC051AST ...........c... DEE LN....... .... ...' ..0.., OELANTEAVE.......... '.14 DEll ST.. ..............-.$ D£NAIR. ...........;..8-1. DENISE DR.............. E.I )4- DENT RO ............... f. OENrONHWY........... E DEREM: .. .......... .... F OESlAEELN............ K. DEVilLE OR. ...........0. DevONSHIRE DR ....... f. DEWSBuAYST ..........0 DIAMONOlOCH........ ,. OtAMOMHOCHE...... F.' DIAMOND LOCH W ..... '_1 DIAMOND OAKS Cf .... ,. DIAMOND OAKS OR N.. E.' D'AMOND OAKS DR S .. E·' O'ANADR ..............Q.) O'...NNAOR_............ L·¡ OOElINt Sf.....,...;.. 0- ¡ DOGWOOD PAlIK. ""'3.J-1 DONEGAL LN.............J Ø()NNA .............. L.1 ~NADR ._........... k OONWELL SOtOOL AD .. L OOOLfHQST ........... A-I OOAAL CT .............. G.I OOAALOR .............G~I DORCHESTER TA ....... H· DORYCt.... .......... f'l OOUGLASDA .......... F DOvE c;T ............ .... O. DOVER LIf. ...... ..~.". H-l DOYLE ..............;0.' DOYLE Sf .-............ C-I ~E"'MLH ........... f· ORUlffHDR ...... ... ',1 Du8l1N CT ....'.. .. .. ..J. OUOf C.T ........ .. t(¥1 DUOU:.Y. _ .. A-I DuNSON DR....... E. Du5T1HCT. .. (j DuSTlND,.............. G DuSTY AD...,........... F· ORDINANCE NO. 1251 "--- AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF A CERTAIN STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, COUNTY OF TARRANT, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the name of the following listed street located in Parker Subdivision, Henry Addition and Bryan Plaza is now and hereby changed to the following listed name: EXISTING NAME - Linma Lane NEW NAME - Daytona Drive SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills providing for the re-naming of streets, and this ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any of such other ordinances except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions, if any, in such other ordinances or ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. - -- If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance, and all of the remainder of this ordinance not so held to be unconstitutional shall continue to be in full force and effect. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1985. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ,~ City Attorney I .~ L CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS Department: Planning and Deve1.O'PIØn.t L For some time the City of N d Hills has been cooperating .with the F,deral Emergency Management Agency administering the cOntrol of designated ilOOd 'plains within the City. Thes ins have been defined ae those areas s sceptible to flooding in the event of a t. or once in låO'Yea-r rainfall ihtens ty. This administration was based upon f10 which was first classified "emergency', and then "preliminary". At. this t~F!Ki bas issued their final determination of:the flood plain elevations for all the major creeks in the City. This determination was . based upon data developè" by the U.$.;Á,rmy Corp of Engineers. This informatioI1 was first provided to the City ~ NØ!abtf 984.and à. ninety day period of evaluat~on was provided in which the City or an", ty 'owner could ,C)bj.ect to the assignmen~s of the flood plain. Since no protest ., ,. 1stered and the remainder of the requit1ed paper work by FEMA has been accompli . ,data has become of~icial. ! I ~ "- .<"/,';<- '<:,':',-":::'-" " ' -" " _: In order that the City can cmi~. _o"participate in the Flood Ineurence Progr"", the Flood Plain data must be adopte,d by.the City and the C1ty must agree to comply -Fith the FEMA rules established fòr Ù1.ìp.g,-eat of the Flood Plain. ~esè rules are contained in the proposed ordinance and are produced from the program regulations of the Nat~onal Flood Insurance Act. These rules specify how development is~oòccur in flood þrone areas and provides the administl'ative process by which Flood Plain data can be altered when development occurs which" .sa-reas from the desiønated flood zone. Th, adopted ordinance must be returned,to .certify1ng that .the City1s in compliance wi*h the required rules. The certified copy of the Ordinance must be provided to FEMA p1fior to October 1. 1985. . COuncil Meeting Daté: 7/22/85 Age. nda Numbe~.: GN 85-69 . . Subject: Ordinance No. 1252 Adoption of Flood Plan Ø8naøement ~rìter1a L . '-- r L . , RECOMMENDATION: It is rec.ommendedthat the Cit,y Council apProve Ordinance No. ~252 adopting the Flood Plain Management criteria réquired to continue in the Flood 1!nsurance Program. i 1 l r I I l 1 1 1 -.--' T Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ¡;llng~ .k. ~ Deped I Head SlgnelUltl CITY' COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available· . Finance Dlrec,or Page 1 of l 1 Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED IA-RA-RS: 162-19 A 480607 May 1 5, 1985 Honorable Don Echols Mayor of the Ci ty of North Richland Hills Tarrant County P.O. Box 18609 North_Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mayor Echols: - -- The Agency did not receive an appeal from you during that ninety-day period, therefore, the determination of the Agency as to the base flood elevations'for your community is considered final. The proposed rule for base flood eleva- tions was published in the Federal Register at 50 FR 6645 on February 6, 1985. The final rule for base flood elevations will be published in the Federal Register as SOon as possible. On December 10, 1984, you were provided copies of the preliminary Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) fòr your community. Since that time, no significant changes have been made to the FIS and FIRM provided to you on the da te ci ted above'. Therefore, those copies will serve as your proof copies. The FIRM will become effective six months from the date of this letter. Before the effective date, FEMA will send you final printed copies of the FIS and FIRM. On December 10, 1984, you received notification of proposed elevations of the flood having a one-percent chance of occurrence in any given year (base flood) for certain locations in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas. The ninety-day appeal period that was initiated on January 18, 1985, when the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) published a notice of proposed base (100-year) flood elevations for the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, in the Mid-Cities Daily News has elapsed. Since the Flood Insurance Study establishing the foregoing base 100-year flood elevations for your community has been completed, certain additional require- ments must be met under Section 1361 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended. The community is required, as a condi tion of continued eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), to adopt or show evidence of adoption of flood plain management regulations that meet the standards of Section 60.3 (d) of the enclosed Program regulations (44 CFR 59, etc.) within six months of the date of this letter. These standards are the minimum requirements and do not supersede any state or local requirements of a more stringent nature. 2 '--- The standards of Section 60.3 (d) which your community is required to meet are explained in the National Flood Insurance Program's Regulations. It must be emphasized that all of the standards must be enacted in a legally enforceable document. Some of these documents should already have been enacted by your community for participation in the Regular Phase of the National Flood In- surance Program. Therefore, compliance by your community with the additional flood plain management requirements may be accomplished in a number .of ways. For example, your community may: (1) incorporate existing regulations by reference in any new regulations adopted to meet the addi tional requirements of Section 60.3 (d) or (2) adopt all of the 60.3 (d) standards in one new, comprehensive set of regula tions, or (3) show evidence that regulations have previously been adopted which meet or exceed the minimum requirements of Section 60.3 (d) Communities that fail to enact the necessary flood plain management regula- tions will be suspended from participation in the program and subject to the prohibitions contained in Section 202(a) of the 1973 Act as amended. If your community is encountering difficulties in enacting flood plain man- agement measures, we urge you to contact FEMA. You may contact the Chief, Natural and Technological Hazards Division of the Federal Emergency Management Agency in Denton, Texas, at (817) 387-5811. Sincerely, ~-\n fl.· tt"t:_ ?"....;.t.^ · t/V4...'1 ""(,~ ~n L. Matticks v.;¢{..... Acting Chief, Risk Studies Division Federal Insurance Administration Enclosure FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE , OUTLINE '-- Cross Ref. NFIP Pg. Regulations ARTICLE 1 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION, FINDINGS OF FACT, PURPOSE AND METHODS 1D SECTION A STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION 1D SECTION B FINDINGS OF FACT 1D SECTION C STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 2D SECTION D METHODS OF REDUCING FLOOD LOSSES ARTICLE 2 DEFINITIONS 2D 59.1 ARTICLE 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS 4D 60.3(d) SECTION A LANDS TO WHICH THIS ORDINANCE APPLIES 4D 60.3(d) SECTION B BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD 5D 60.3(d) (1) SECTION C . ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 5D 60.3(d) (1) SECTION D COMPLIANCE 5D - ----- SECTION E ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS 5D SECTION F INTERPRETATION SECTION G WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OR LIABILITY 5D ARTICLE 4 ADMINISTRATION 6D SECTION A DESIGNATION OF THE FLOOD PLAIN ADMINISTRATOR 6D 60.3(d) (1) SECTION B DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF 'THE FLOOD PLAIN ADMINISTRATOR 6D 60.3(d) (1) SECTION C PERMIT PROCEDURES 6D 60.3(d) (1) SECTION D VARIANCE PROCEDURES 7D 60.6(a) ARTICLE 5 PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION 9D SECTION A GENERAL STANDARDS 9D 60.3(d) (1) SECTION B SPECIFIC STANDARDS 9D 60.3(d) (1) 1 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 9D 60.3(d) (1) 2 NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION 9D 60.3(d) ( 1) 3 MOBILE HOMES 9D 60.3(d) (1) SECTION C STANDARDS FOR SUBDIVISION PROPOSALS 10D 60.3(d) (1) SECTION D STANDARDS FOR AREAS OF SHALLOW FLOODING (A)/AH ZONES) llD 60.3(d) (1) SECTION E FLOODWAYS llD 60.3(d) (2)-4 ARTICLE 6 SAVINGS CLAUSE AND CIVIL ENFORCEMENT 12D-13D ORDINANCE NO. 1252 BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: The following Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance be, and in hereby, adopted as the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, to be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage and approval. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE ARTICLE I STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION, FINDINGS OF FACT, PURPOSE AND METHODS SECTION A. STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION The Legislature of the State of Texas has in Vernon Annotated Civil Statutes Article, 962, delegated the responsibility to local governmental units to adopt regulations designated to minimize flood losses. Therefore, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas does ordain as follows: SECTION B. FINDINGS OF FACT -.'-.- (1) The flood hazard areas of the City of North Richland Hills are subject to periodic inundation which results in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, and extrao!dinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety and general welfare. (2) These flood losses are created by the cumulative effect of obstructions in Flood Plains which cause an increase in flood heights and velocities, and by the the occupancy of flood hazard areas by uses vulnerable to floods and hazardous to other lands because they are inadequately elevated, floodproofed or otherwise protected from flood damage. SECTION C. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety and general welfare and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed to: (1) Protect human life and health; (2) Minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood control projects; (3) Minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public; ID (4) Minimize prolonged business interruptions; (5) Minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains, electric, telephone and sewer lines, streets and bridges located in flood plains; '- (6) Help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use and development of flood-prone areas in such a manner as to minimize future flood blight areas; and, (7) Insure that potential buyers are notified that property is in a flood area. SECTION D. METHODS OF REDUCING FLOOD LOSSES In order to accomplish its purposes, this ordinance uses the following methods: (1) Restrict or prohibit uses that are dangerous to health, safety or property in times of flood, or cause excessive increases in flood heights or velocities; (2) Require that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction; (3) Control the alternation of natural flood plains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers, which are involved in the accommodation of flood waters; (4) Control filling, grading, dredging and other development which may increase flood damage; -',--... (5) Prevent or regulate the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert floodwaters or which may increase flood hazards to other lands. ARTICLE 2 DEFINITIONS Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance shall be interpreted to give them the meaning they have in common usage and to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. APPEAL means a request for a review of the Flood Plain Administrator's interpretation of any provision of this ordinance or a request for a variance. AREA OF SHALLOW FLOODING means a designated AO, AH, or VO Zone on a community's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) with a one percent chance or greater annual chance of flooding to an average depth of one to three feet where a clearly defined channel does not exist, where the path of flooding is unpredictable and where velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow. AREA OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD is the land in the flood plain within a community subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. The area may be designated as Zone A on the FHBM. After detailed ratemaking has been completed in preparation for publication of the FIRM, Zone A usually is refined into Zones A, AO, AH, AI-99, VO or VI-30. 2D BASE FLOOD means the flood having a one percent chance of being equalled or exceeded in any given year. DEVELOPMENT means any man-made change in improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations. EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK OR MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more mobile home lots for rent or sale for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lot on which the mobile home is to be affixed (including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads, and the construction of streets) is completed before the effective date of adoption of flood plain management regulations. EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK OR MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION means the preparation of additional sites by the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the mobile homes are to be affixed (including the installation of utilities, either final site grading or pouring of concrete pads, or the construction of streets). FLOOD OR FLOODING means a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from; (1) the overflow of inland or tidal waters. (2) the unusual and rapid accululation or runoff of surface waters from any source. --- ""-"" FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) means an official map of a community, on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY is the official report provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The report contains flood profiles, the water surface elevation of the base flood, as well as the Flood Boundary-Floodway Map. FLOODWAY (REGULATORY FLOODWAY) means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height. HABITABLE FLOOR means any floor usable for living purposes, which includes working, sleeping, eating, cooking or recreation, or a combination thereof. A floor used for storage purposes only is not a "habitable floor". HIGHEST ADJACENT GRADE means the highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure. MEAN SEA LEVEL means the average height of the sea for all stages of the tide. MOBILE HOME means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. It does not include recreational vehicles or travel trailers. 3D NEW MOBILE HOME PARK OR MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more mobile home lots for rent or sale for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lot on which the mobile home is to be affixed (including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, either ,-. final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads, and the construction of streets) is completed on or after the effective date of this ordinance. START OF CONSTRUCTION means the first placement of permanent construction of a structure (other than a mobile home) on a site, such as the pouring of slabs or footings or any work beyond the stage of excavation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading, and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers or foundations or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation of the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not as part of the main structure. For a structure (other than a mobile home) without a basement or poured footings, the "state of construction" includes the first permanent framing or assemble of the structure or any part thereof on its piling or foundation. For mobile homes not within a mobile home park or mobile home subdivision "start of construction" means the affixing of the mobile home to its permanent site. For mobile homes within mobile home parks or mobile home subdivisions, "start of construction" is the date on which the construction of facilities for servicing the site on which the mobile home is to be affixed (including, at a minimum, the construction of streets, either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads, the installation of utilities) is completed. STRUCTURE means a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground as well as a mobile home. -'-- SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT means any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50% of the market value of the structure either, (1) before the improvement or repair is started, or (2) if' the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred. For the purposes of this definition "substantial improvement" is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether nor not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not, however, include either (1) any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assure safe living conditions, or (2) any alteration of a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a State Inventory of Historic Places. VARIANCE is a grant of relief to a person from the requirements of this ordinance when specific enforcement would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance, therefore, permits construction or development in a manner otherwise prohibited by this ordinance. ARTICLE 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION A LANDS TO WHICH THIS ORDINANCE APPLIES This ordinance shall apply to all areas of special flood hazard with the jurisdiction of the City of North Richland Hills. (local unit) 4D SECTION B BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD The areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in a scientific and engineering report entitled, "The Flood Insurance Study '- for the City of North Richland Hills, " dated November, 1985. with accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Boundary-Floodway Maps and any revision thereto are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. SECTION C ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT A Development Permit shall be required to ensure conformance with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION D COMPLIANCE No structure or land shall hereafter be located, altered, or have its use changed without full compliance with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. SECTION E ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS This ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, convenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this ordinance and another conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more stringent restrictions shall prevail. SECTION F INTERPRETATION In the interpretation and application of this ordinance, all provisions shall be; (1) considered as minimum requirements; (2) liberally construed in favor of 'the governing body; and (3) deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under State statutes. SECTION G WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OR LIABILITY The degree of flood protection required by this ordinance is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations. On rare occasions greater floods can and will occur and flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. This ordinance does not imply that land outside the areas of special flood hazards or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of the City of North Richland Hills or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. 5D ARTICLE 4 ADMINISTRATION '-- SECTION A DESIGNATION OF THE FLOOD PLAIN ADMINISTRATOR The Director of Planning and Development is hereby appointed the Flood Plain Administrator to administer and implement the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION B DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE FLOOD PLAIN ADMINISTRATOR Duties and responsibilities of the Flood Plain Administrator shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Maintain and hold open for public inspection all records pertaining to the provisions of this ordinance. (2) Review, approve or deny all applications for development permits required by adoption of this ordinance. (3) Review permits for proposed development to assure that all neGessary permits have been obtained from those Federal, State or local governmental agencies (including Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 U.S.C. 1334) from which prior approval is required. (4) Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazards (for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions) the Flood Plain Administrator shall make the necessary interpretation. ~'------ (5) Notify adjacent communities and the Division of Emergency Managment Texas Department of Public Safety prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. (6) Assure that maintenance is provided within the altered or relocated portion of said watercourse so that the flood carrying capacity is not diminished. (7) When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Article 3, Section B, the Flood Plain Administrator shall obtain review and reasonable utilize any base flood elevation data available from a Federal, State or other source, in order to administer the provisions of Article 5. SECTION C PERMIT PROCEDURES (1) Application for a Development Permit shall be presented to the Flood Plain Administrator on forms furnished by him/her and may include, but not be limited to plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the location, dimensions, and elevation of proposed landscape alterations, existing and proposed structures, and the location of the foregoing in relation to areas of special flood hazard. Additionally, the following information is required: 6D (a) Elevation is relation to mean sea level, of the lowest floor (including basement) of all proposed structures; (b) Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any nonresidential structure shall be floodproofed; "-- (c) A certificate from a registered professional engineer or architect that the nonresidential floodproofed structure shall meet the floodproofing criteria of Article 5, Section B(2); (d) Description of the extent to which any watercourse or natural drainage will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development. (2) Approval or denial of a Development Permit by the Flood Plain Administrator shall be based on all of the provisions of this ordinance and the following relevant factors: (a) The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; (b) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; (c) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others; (d) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; (e) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; -'-- (f) The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions including maintenance and repair of streets and bridges, and public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems; (g) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the flood waters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site; (h) The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable; (i) The availability of alternative locations, not subject to flooding or erosion damage, for the proposed use; (j) The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan for that area. SECTION D VARIANCE PROCEDURES (1) The Board of Adjustment as established by the City of North Richland Hills shall hear and render judgement on requests for variances from the requirements of this ordinance. 7D (2) The Board of Adjustment shall hear and render judgement on an appeal only when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the Flood Plain Administrator in the enforcement or administration of this ordinance. (3) Any person or persons aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Adjustment may appeal such decision in the courts of competent jurisdiction. (4) The Flood Plain Administrator shall maintain a record of all actions involving an appeal and shall report variances to the Federal Emergency Management Agency upon request. (5) Variances may be issued for the reconstruction, rehabilitation or restoration of structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the State Inventory of Historic Places, without regard to the procedures set forth in the remainder of this ordinance. (6) Generally, variances may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, providing the relevant factors in Section C (2) of this Article have been fully considered. As the lot size increases beyond the one-half acre, the technical justification required for issuing the variance increases. (7) Upon consideration of the factors noted above and the intent of this ordinance, the Board of Adjustment may attach such conditions to the (appeal board) granting of variances as it deems necessary to further the purpose and objectives of this ordinance (Article 1, Section C). -............. (8) Variances shall not be issued within any designated floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. (9) Prerequisites for granting variances: (a) Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. (b) Variances shall only be issued upon (i) a showing of good and sufficient cause, (ii) a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant, and (3) (iii) and a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. (è) Any application to whom a variance is granted shall be given written notice that the structure will be permitted to be built with the lowest. floor elevation below the base flood elevation, and that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the increased risk resulting from the reduced lowest floor elevation. 8D ARTICLE 5 PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION SECTION A GENERAL STANDARDS In all areas of special flood hazards the following provisions are required: (1) All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure: (2) All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage; (3) All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; (4) All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system; (5) New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharge from the systems into flood waters; and, (6) On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. SECTION B SPECIFIC STANDARDS -""-... In all areas of special flood hazards where base flood elevation data has been provided as set forth in (1) Article 3, Section B, (2) Article 4, Section B(?); or (3) Article 5, Section C(3), the following provisions are required: (1) Residential Construction - new construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the base flood elevation. A registered professional engineer, architect, or 'land surveyor shall submit a certification to the Flood Plain Administrator that the standard of this subsection as proposed in Article 4, Section C(I)a, is satisfied. (2) Nonresidential Construction - new construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial or other nonresidential structure shall either have the lowest floor including basement, elevated to the level of the base flood elevation or, together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. A registered professional engineer or architect shall submit a certification to the Flood plain Administrator that the standards of this subsection as proposed in Article 4, Section C(I)c, are satisfied. (3) Mobile Homes (a) No mobile home shall be placed in a floodway, or if applicable, a coastal high hazard area, except in an existing mobile home park or existing mobile home subdivision. 9D (b) All mobile homes shall be anchored to resist f1otation, collapse, or lateral movement by providing over-the-top and frame ties to ground anchors" Specific requirements shall be: '-- (i) Over-the-top ties at each of the four corners of the mobile home, with two additional ties per side at intermediate locations and mobile homes less than 50 feet long requiring one additional tie per side; (ii) frame ties at each corner of the home with five additional ties per side at intermediate points and mobile homes less than 50 feet long requiring four additional ties per side; (iii) all components of the anchoring system be capable of carrying a force of 4,800 pounds; (iv) any additions to the mobile home be similarly anchored. (c) Require that an evacuation plan indicating alternate vehicular access and escape routes be filed with appropriate Disaster preparedness Authorities for mobile home parks and mobile home subdivisions located within Zone A. (d) All mobile homes shall be in compliance with Article 5, Section B(I). (e) For new mobile home parks and subdivision, for expansions to existing mobile home parks and subdivisions where the repair, reconstruction or improvement of the streets, utilities and pads equal or exceeds 50% of the value of the streets, utilities and pads before the repair, reconstruction or improvement has commenced; and for mobile homes not placed in a mobile home park or subdivision require: -"-,.. (i) stands or lots are elevated on compacted fill or on pilings so that the lowest floor of the mobile home will be at or above the base flood level. A registered professional engineer, architect, or land surveyor shall submit a certification to the Flood Plain Administrator that the standard of this paragraph complies with Section B(I) of this Article; (ii) adequate surface drainage and access for a hauler are provided; and, (iii) in the instance of elevation on pilings: (1) lots are large enough to permit steps, (2) piling foundations are placed in stable soil no more than ten feet apart, and (3) reinforcement is provided for piers more than six feet above the ground level. SECTION C STANDARDS FOR SUBDIVISION PROPOSALS (1) All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with Article 1, Sections B, C, and D of this ordinance. (2) All proposals for the development of subdivisions shall meet Development Permit requirements of Article 3, Section C, Article 4, Section C and the provisions of Article 5 of this ordinance. -,.~ 10D (3) Base flood elevation data shall be generated for subdivision proposals and other proposed development which is greater than 50 lots or 5 acres, whichever is lesser, if not otherwise provided pursuant to Article 3, Section B or Article 4, Section B(7) of this ordinance. (4) All subdivision proposals shall have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood hazards. (5) All subdivision proposals shall have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage. SECTION D STANDARDS FOR AREAS OF SHALLOW FLOODING (AO/AH ZONES) Located within the areas of special flood hazard established in Article 3, Section 3, are areas designated as shallow flooding. These areas have special flood hazards associated with base flood depths of 1 to 3 feet where a clearly defined channel does not exist and where the path of flooding is unpredictable and where velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow; therefore, the following provisions apply: (1) All new construction and substantial improvements of residential structures have the lowest floor (including basement) elevated above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as the depth number specified in feet on the community's FIRM (at least two feet if no depth number is specified). (2) All new construction and substantial improvements of nonresidential structures: _··h...._ (i) have the lowest floor (including basement) elevated above the highest adjacent grade at least as high as the depth number specified in feet on the community's FIRM (at least two feet if no depth number is specified), or; (ii) together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities be designed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydroynamic loads of effects of buoyancy. loads of effects of buoyancy. (3) A registered professional engineer or a~chitect shall submit a certification to the Flood Plain Administrator that the standards of this Section, as proposed in Article 4, Section C(I)a, are satisfied. (4) Require within Zones AH and AO, adequate drainage paths around structures on slopes, to guide floodwaters around and away from proposed structures. SECTION E. FLOODWAYS Floodways - located within areas of special flood hazard established in Article 3, Section B, are areas designated as floodways. Since the floodway is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of flood waters which carry debris, potential projectiles and erosion potential, the following provisions, shall apply; llD (1) Encroachments are prohibited, including fill, new' construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certification by a professional registeréd engineer or architect is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in an "adverse effect" on the carrying capacity of the 100-year flood plain during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. (2) If Article 5, Section E(I) above is satisfied, all new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Article 5. (3) Prohibit the placement of any mobile home, except in an existing mobile home park or subdivision. ARTICLE 6 SAVINGS CLAUSE AND CIVIL ENFORCEMENT A. If any portion of this ordinance is declared to be invalid it shall not affect the remaining valid portions. B. The reference in this ordinance to regulation of any activity which is precluded or regulated by the Zoning Ordinance or other ordinances of the City shall not be construed to allow such activity or to alter the terms of the Zoning Ordinance or other ordinances pertaining to particular land use or development. -"~,,-..- C. The City shall have the right to enforce this ordinance by civil action in a court of compentent jurisdiction. It is hereby found and declared by The City of North Richland Hills that severe flooding has occurred in the past within its jurisdiction and will certainly occur within the future; that flooding is likely to result in infliction of serious personal injury or death, and is likely to result in substantial injury or destruction of property within its jurisdiction; in order to effectively comply with minimum standards for coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program; and in order to effectively remedy the situation described herein, it is necessary that this ordinance become effective immediately. Therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance, being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval. 12D THIS PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DAY OF , 1985. APPROVED: ATTEST: Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, , do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of an ordinance duly adopted by the (local unit) , at a regular meeting duly convened at the on (Secretary or Responsible Person) (Seal) ~. 13D r. I I r Lf L L l L L , , L r L L L I ¡ L ( ì L f L f L ! L I L --- ifI' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Dep~rtment: P1Ihl'j.r WQrks Council Meeting Date: 7-22-85 Subject: M;f..sce 11 ;:¡neo1ls St:f'eet: &J)t~iT)1'1~ TTl\PTovem~nt:a Pay Estitnate <116 Agenda Number: PAY 85-27 This contract: includesSh7rida'/),>Linma Lane, Bewl~y anøA'rnold Térrace. This pro.j ect is now complereexcep,"t for the final course of asp1}alt on Sheridan and Bewley and the final ¢l~~n~upon these streets. Recommendation: Thesta.ff's 'recommendation is to apprövepayment in the amount of $24,658.42 to APAC....1'-exas, Inc. " Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) GO OI).rat.lng........ElUd.G..t.. ... . ... . .--................................................................... Oth.r·.i~ .<·i:r((yii. DepartmentRe_c:tSignatµrei. ..... ... .... CIT'lCOUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number 13-00-03-6150 I . Sufficient e. ds Available . Finance Director L City Manager Page 1 of I / II KNOWL TO'N-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth· Dallas -- July 11. 1985 ~ Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 - ..::.;;....;~;-~- - Re: 3-228, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MISC. 1984 PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON SHERIDAN DR., PARAMOUNT DR. LINMA LANE, BEWLEY ST. AN6 ARNOLD TERRACE CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.6 . . . . . . Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No'. 6, 'dated July 11,1985, made payable to APAC-Texas, Inc., in the amount of . $24,658.42, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of June 23,' 1985. . - --. The Quant ities and condit ion of the project have been verified on-s ite by your representative, Floyd A. McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We reèommend that. this payment, in amount of $24,658.42. be made to APAC-Texas, Inc. P.O. Box 1807. Ft. Worth, TX, 76101. Along with a copy ,of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any Questions you may have concerning this project. ,. ~ t Ç2/Þ- P.E. RWA/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddl e, Director of Publ ic Works + iD:US Copy FOR Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector (Street & Drainage) Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Apac-Texas. Inc. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283·6211 . METRO/267·3367 ~r" L L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Utility Council Meeting Date: 7-22-85 Sanitar Agenda Number: PAY 85-28 ¡ L Th:Ls is the sewe.r linetn~t.$tart$at the south cityUDdts of Watauga and goes nor,.th up the eastslo~eof Watauga. It will tie into the 30' line that we started at Loop 820. and went north to the Watuaga south city limits. This project is nowabout3Ò%complete. Recommendation: The s~aff'$teco_ndation is to apPt.'oyepayment of $48,328.20 to P& R Construction Company. L ¡ L f L ! i L..... L f LL L I L - f L L L L Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) Operating Budget Other Rev . Finance Director - ------ ¡ ì L ~~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of I _/ . KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas '-- July 10. 1985 ... Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Rich1and Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-421, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BIG FOSSIL CREEK SANITARY SEWER WATAUGA TRUNK LINE - PHASE 2 CONTRACTOR1S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.1 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.1. dated July 10, 1985, made payable to P & R Construction Co. Inc., in the amount of $48,328.20, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of June 30, 1985. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by - '-- your representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the original submittal, and we have ,checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $48,328.20, be made to P & R Construction Co. Inc.. 2040 Loop 336, Suite 125, Conroe, TX, 77304. Along with a copy of this letter. the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month1s estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. DDN~.E~ ~ DHC/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager / Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. A.llen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Scott Jenogan, utilities Inspector . Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance P & R Construction Inc. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267.3367 L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS L Department: Public Work.S Council Meeting Date: 7.,...22-85 Agenda Number: PAY 85-29 L C,. ""., Subject: Street & Draina2e ImproVê1Ilèntson Harwood· Road Pay Estimate 113·· L This street is about.~.5%(!()1'i1plete. All of the asphalt~d<cutb and gutters are in... Balance of the wd~J.to be done is to move a signal póleand the final cle.an-up. L /. ',' , Recommendation: The staff's~eêó.ndation is t.o app~ðve .páymént of $951.52 to Austin Road Co. í ¡ I L I L L f L I L ¡ L. I L 1 L , , i L. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~_ ~ ~4..L,. /J , Dpartment Heaò-S,Qns-- re CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM GO , Finance Director ---- - r IL ~ r . I...... Page 1 of I /. . K~OWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TlNG ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas '- July 10. 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-229, CITY OF NORTH RICHlA~D HIllS SIREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVE ENTS ON HAR~OOD ROAD FROM BOB DR. TO HIGHWAY 26 CONTRACTOR1S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE Np. 3 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.3, dated July 9, 1985, made payable to Austin Road Co.. in the amount of $951.52, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of June 30, 1985. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative. Floyd A. McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. -.'- We recorrrnend that this payment. in amount of $951.52, be made to Austin Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Ft. Worth, TX, 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ~W. l1t~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works6. THIS COP...)'; EOB Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Directorof~ublic Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. lee Maness, Director of Finance Austin Road Co. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267.3367 L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ¡ L Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 7-22-85 Subject: Glenview Driveßtre,~ &iÐ1!'ainaae Improvements Pay Estimate ii3 Agenda Number: PAY 85-30 L í f I L This street has the.base~8pþaltonitat this timE! and1.s>Ii1Pproximately 80~ complete. The main..thi.ng.lefttobe done on tljisstreet is the final course of asphalt. i L Recommendation: Thestz.aff's recosnmendation is to apprOVe the payment .\ of $66,573.26 to Austi.n>ioad.Co. L Funding sources are listed. as f911o'Ws: r I ! L 13-00-04-6150 - $'66~117.26 09-00-66-6700 - 4~6.oo Total $66.573.26 I L L ¡ I\.- L- L í L - I L ¡ I L. ¡ I L Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) Operating Budget Other gJ ~ t,... '\:Sl .' · , oépartm nt _' _Ie , CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM GO & Rev See. Above ..L ¡ ! l ! I L . Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of I / . KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas '-- July 10, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-230, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~T~~Er AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS O~ §LENV!EW DR. FROM HONEY LANE TO RUFE SNOW DR. CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.3 - Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.3, dated July 9, 1985, made payable to Austin Road Co., in the amount of $66,573.26, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of June 30, 1985. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd A. McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $66,573.26, be made to Austin Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Ft. Worth, TX, 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ~aJ-W, ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/11 d Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works ~ i1}USCOPY.FOR Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of P~lic Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Austin Road Co. ',-- 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267.3367 -.._--_..__._--".._~ r. ...... ;¡ ~·I·iDepartme",: PubUC WOrks "- Subject: Street Paving.. 11I1{>rov~nts 'fôr' H:i.ghtow-er· Drive Pay Estimate #1 ,- I L l L L r '-- I I ì L ¡ '-- ¡- L r I L L r~ ¡ i- L r L L L r [ i '-- CITY OF NORTHRICHLAND HILLS 7-22-85 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PAY 85-31 As ~ou know, we purch4~C!~tl1~h01U7<ºf.Mr...·..and.Mrs. ..'¡0l'anParker at the. corner of S.mithfield Road andWh!t'W(t1.11d1)C!;i:a18htower.J)rive..a.ndwe now. have all of the right of way thlitWenee;d<?to?'participate With the developer to the north on this street .!i:hu . , .,.....:. We took bids and the>CQ~t17~1.2¥l>þrÇ)~..dSRO Asphalt"Inç. as.contractor on the street. So. far t~~t~~.on1.YdOne the roughgJ;'ad.i11gontnis street. At the present timetqcæyaJ;'ew-aiting'£or the telepbonec.atnpany to move in and lower one of their cables . before they go back to start .. the stablization. Recommendation: Tbeš'~a:ff'sréç011lt1M!ndat:i.on is to approve the payment of $7,336.85 to SRO Aspba.lt,Inc" -' Finance Review Acet. Number 13-00-56-6150 Sufficient ds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) _ Operating Budget _ Other ~ Ð~v& Department .t~ SItl_ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fll'lance OIfeClor ' "\. Page 1 of I .'-- Elliott & Hughes, Inc. Engineers /Planners July 9, 1985 Mr. M.E. Gene Riddle Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas Re: Street Paving Improvements HIGHTOWER DRIVE City of North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Mr. Riddle: We transmit herewith the original and two (2) copies of Periodical Estimate No. 1 for work completed on the Street Paving Improvements to serve HIGHTOWER DRIVE, in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. The estimate, in the net amount of $7,336.85 is drawn in favor of S.R.O. Asphalt, Inc., and is submitted for payment in accordance with the terms of the construction contract between S.R.O. Asphalt and the City of North Richland Hills, dated May 23, 1985. ì.- ~ We would appreciate your issuing a check to S.R.O. Asphalt, Inc. in the amount stated above and mail ing same to them at their address of 1007 Harrison Street, Arlington, Texas 76010. We appreciate your cooperation and assistance in this matter and respect- fully invite you to contact us should you have questions or desire additional information. alter A. Elliott, Jr., P. . /sa cc Quadrangle Development Company; Mr. W.E. Pasteur S.R.O. Asphalt, Inc; Mr. Gary Keetch file Attachments 2275 Westpark Court, Suite 201 . Euless, Texas 76040 . 817/267-1303 .- '-- ....... - -- '-- 817 336-5773 Metro 429-8306 ~~ TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS fi/&!JL, CONSULTING ENGINEERS July 16, 1985 .. .( Mr. Rodger Line, City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills. Texas 76118 Re: College Hills Addition Lot 5. Block B & Block C Dear Rodger: The plat for the subject property was approved last year subject to review of interior water, sewer and drainage plans. The plans for this property have now been submitted to the City and a review letter has been received by our firm. In reviewing the engineer's letter with our client. he has some major concerns relative to some of the items in the letter which he believes to be outside the scope of the original intent of the Council in their motion to approve this subdivision. Therefore. we respectfully request to be placed on the July 22, 1985. Council agenda to discuss this matter. Due to previous commitments relative to meetings on that same night, we would request that this item be placed toward the end of the agenda. Thank you for consideration of our request. Should you have any questions concerning this matter. please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. Perkins, P.E. JRP/kfs cc: TLB-GSC Enterprises, Inc. 915 Florence Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102