HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1985-08-26 Agendas
L.
l
I
¡
L
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 26, 1985 - 6:00 P.M.
.,j"".
i..-
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820.
L
1
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
"
\
I
i
-L-
1.
Review of Interchange Design
for SH 26,FM 1938, Loop 820,
& Bedford-Euless Rd.; and
Preparation for ~resentation
to State·Department of
Highways and Public
Transportation
~
~
2.
PS 85-32 Request of Terry Sisk, J.B.
Sandlin & Mike Sandlin for
Final Plat· of Lots 9 through
13, Johns Addition, Third
Filing (Located on the east side of
Davis Blvd. and south of the St. Louis
& Southwestern·· Railroad)
(Agenda Item #11)
'--
I
I
"-
I
i..-
'-
3.
PZ 85-4 Proposed Thoroughfare Plan,
Ordinance No. 1270
(Agenda Item #7)
'-
4.
GN85-80 Request of Dr. Alexander
Graham for Curb Cut on Davis
Boulevard (Agenda Item #18)
i..-
i
!.-
i..-
r--
Page 2
-
I
.... NUMBER
i
i..-
5.
L
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
GN 85-24 Self-Insuring the City's
Workers' Compensation Program
(Agenda Item #20)
I
..... 6.
.....
7.
.....
8.
PZ 85-56 Discussion of Proposed
Comprehensive Mðster Plan
Other Items
*Executive Session to Discuss
tand,Personnel, and/or
Litigation
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by
the Open Meetings Law
-
"-
L-
i
'--
L-
L-
"-
I
¡
.....
"-
~....._--...__..._.~ ..-~".,.-~.- - . --..-...... -~_.._--.-.
CITY O~ NORTH RICH1AND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
AUGUST 26, 1985
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
-..-.
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting August 12,
1985
5. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda
6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by
Asterisk (10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24 & 25)
7. PZ 85-40 Proposed Thoroughfare Plan,
Ordinance No. 1270
8. PZ 85-42 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
- APPEAL HEARING - Request of
B.H.& L. Joint Venture to rezone
Tract lOA, lOB, lOA 1, lOBI, T.
Peck Survey, Abstract 1210, & part
of Tract 5, Brentwood Estates from
AG (Agriculture) & C-1 to C-l
(Commercial) (Tract 1) (Located
east and west of Davis Boulevard
in the area of Shady Grove Road
and Wilson Lane.
9.
Ordinance No. 1254
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*10. PZ 85-90 Amendment to Zoning Ordinance,
Ordinance allowing Pet Stores in
C-1 (Commercial) & C-2
(Commercial) Districts, Ordinance
No. 1268
11. PS 85-32 Request of Terry Sisk, J.B.
Sandlin & Mike Sandlin for Final
Plat of Lots 9 through 13, Johns
Addition, Third Filing (Located on
the east side of Davis Blvd. and
south of the St. Louis &
Southwestern Railroad)
*12. PS 85-46 Request of Jack Roseberry for
Final Plat of Lot 9, Block 1,
Mollie B. Collins Addition
(Located on the west side of
Smithfield Road at Mickey Street)
*13. PS 85-50 Request of Burk Collins
Investments for Replat of Lot 3R,
Block 50, Nor'East Addition
(Located on the west side of Davis
Boulevard and extending through to
the southeast corner of Lola Drive
and Roberta Drive)
*14. PS 85-51 Request of Glenview Park Joint
Venture for Replat of Lots 10A-R &
10B-R, Block 1, and Block 2 and
Lots lOAR & 10BR, Block 1,
Glenview Park Addition (Located on
the south side of Glenview Drive
and west of Jackie Lee Lane)
Page 3
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*15. PS 85-52 Request of Williamsburg
Associates, Inc. for Replat of
Lots lR, 2R, 3, & 4, Block 7,
Industrial Park Subdivision
(Located at the southwest corner
of Rufe Snow Drive and Industrial
Park Drive)
16. GN 85-78 Public Hearing - Operating Budget
17. GN 85-79 Public Hearing - Revenue Sharing
Budget
18. GN 85-80 Request of Dr. Alexander Graham
for Curb Cut on Davis Boulevard
*19. GN 85-81 Resolution No. 85-18, Approving
Issuance of Industrial Development
Bonds for M & H Realty Company
*20. PU 85-24 Self-Insuring the City's Worker's
Compensation Program
*21. PU 85-25 Lease/Purchase Financing Fire
Department Equipment
*22. PAY 85-40 Payment of Architectural Fees to
Komatsu and Associates for the
Public Works Service Center
*23. PAY 85-41 Payment to Komatsu and Associates
for Architectural Fees for the
Animal Control Center
Page 4
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*24.
*25.
ff/ Æ:.zJ
Hewitt Street Paving & Drainage
Improvements Change Order #1
PAY 85-43 Big Fossil Creek Sanitary Sewer
Outfall Line Phase II, Pay
Estimate fI2
26.
Citizen Presentation
27.
Adjournment
City of JXórth Richland Hills, Texas
¡
, "
\....;. '"
-- .
7.;-; 'r"
J;/ I, i
August 23, 1985
PUBLIC NOTICE
Item added to the August 26, 1985, City Council Agenda
l5A. PS 85-60 Request of B. R. Nowell for Final
Plat, Lot 6, ßlock 1, Cater Addition
~~.
IIIIL.. ~
(8171 281-G041n301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS.TX 76118
- .
"
"
-- ;;:::o:::a
~
--
City of J\9rth Richland Hills, Texas
~-
MEMORANDUM
August 26, 1985
TO:
Rodger N. Line, City Manager
FROM:
Richard Royston
Director of Planning and Development
SUBJECT:
Proposed Comprehensive Master Plan
At their meeting of August 12, 1985 the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the
proposed Future Land Use Map to be placed in the Comprehensive Master Plan for the City
of North Richland Hills. The map which was under consideration had been revised to
incorporate all of the changes which had occurred as a result of zoning actions taken
since the map had been previously drafted. In addition the Base Map on which the land
use was placed was modified to conform to the same base utilized by the Thoroughfare
Plan. The Future Land Use Map is the last element of the Master Plan to be brought up
to date. With the compilation of the following items;
(1) Future Land Use Plan
(2) Thoroughfare Plan
(3) Master Drainage Plan
(4) Master Water System Plan
(5) Master Sewer System Plan
(6) Park Master Plan
(7) Analysis and Policy statement Text,
the overall Comprehensive Plan for the City of North Richland Hills is complete and
ready for adoption by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council
that they review and comment on the complete Comprehensive Master Plan.
(8171281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118
. ~.~~. . ~ '.....
. "i' . II)
"-
-
PROPOSED .
Cor¡1PREHENS lYE
PLAN
- ..........
.--..
-,
-. . ~ ..
"
,,~.
- ',-
-
COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN
SECTION I - ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
The analysis section of the Comprehensive Plan is a distillation of the
information gathered by the Planning and Zoning Commission of North Richland
Hills, Texas. The statistical information contained in this section
represents a combination of analysis of received statistics and subjective
judgements made by the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the City of
North Richland Hills.
POPULATION
Purpose:
The reason behind population analysis is that population
statistics are a measure of the condition of a community.
Population statistics are not an end to themselves, but are
community indicators. Information as to the total expected
population gives an approximation of what the overall demand
for City services might be.
Population statistics are often treated as if changes in
population numbers occur in a vacuum. Population changes are
interwoven with physical, political, economic, social and other
forces. The more these forces are changed in dramatic or rapid
form, the more dramatic and rapid are the changes in popula-
tion .
....
...
.,
--..
- '--
--..
History:
Holding
Capacity:
Historical population statistics for North Richland Hills
begins in 1960. The following is a tabulation of the Bureau of
the Census counts.
1960
1970
1980
1985
8,662
16,514
30,592
39,710 *
*North Central Texas Council of Governments Estimate
Since its incorporation, North Richland Hills has almost
doubled in population every ten years. The City has also
increased considerably in physical size through annexation.
However, most of the land annexed was very sparsely developed,
and the majority of the population growth has resulted from
increases in residential development.
Holding capacity is a term that refers to the number of persons
that can live within a given georgraphical area given a certain
. .
population density or, when North Richland Hills is fully
developed, how many people will live in the City. This is an
important issue because of the fiscal factors. The cost of
municipal services and sales tax as well as ad valorem tax
income can be estimated, if the number of people, types and
numbers of dwelling units. and business types are properly
projected .
Presently, North Richland Hills houses about ten persons per
acre within fully developed residential areas. North Richland
2
...,~
--..,
Hills will have an ultimate population of approximately 90,000
persons when the City is fully developed. This is based on the
presumption that about 85% of the land area will be used for
residential purposes, that no further annexation takes place
and that the density will remain the same, i.e. no major shifts
will be made in the Zoning pattern or within the zoning
categories.
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Retail:
The recent population growth and retail/commercial construction
has propelled the City from a minor role to a major role in the
economy of Northeast Tarrant County.
---..,
The retail sector has experienced considerable growth and
health in the past five years. This is primarily due to the
opening of North Hills Mall and retail centers along the Rufe
Snow corridor.
. .
With a continuing strong growth trend, ample room to grow and
new retail/commercial facilities the retail/commercial sector
should continue to grow.
Industrial:
While the retail/commercial sector has experienced extensive
growth, the industrial sector has lagged mainly due to a lack
of a coordinated effort by the City and others to attract
industrial users. Although the City has an Industrial
-'
3
"
..
.,
~
Conclusion:
~
~
Development Bond Corporation this group has not been supported
and encouraged to become more active in seeking clients.
Another factor is the lack of adequate thoroughfares to support
truck traffic in the Industrial areas. The adoption and
implementation of the Thoroughfare Plan included in this report
will answer those needs.
The general economy is strong at this time in North Richland
Hills. Recent developments have placed the City among the
major regional retail/commercial market competitors. While the
short term outlook is positive, the volatile nature of a retail
oriented economy is such that rapid change can be negative as
well as positive.
Several problem factors are:
o
Aging of the older retail facilities in the southern
portion of the City and of the population around them
o
Development of new superior regional retail facili-
ties in the surrounding cities which could capture a
considerable amount of sales dollars
o
Long lag time delay between development of new
residential areas and subsequent development of
retail facilities
The City should develop strategies to strengthen and diversify
the retail sector in order to prolong the positive cycles of
the retail sector.
4
..
~
- '--
'-
-,
PHYSICAL FEATURES
Drainage:
It is useful to determine the natural and man-made physical
aspects of an area. An analysis of these features indicate
their encouragement or discouragement of the use of lands by
man.
Environmental considerations are of significant importance.
This is based primarily on practical considerations.
The six drainage basin areas are:
o
Big Fossil Creek
Calloway Branch
Walker Branch
Little Bear Creek
Mesquite Branch
Mackey Branch
o
o
o
o
o
and tributaries. These drainage areas are shown on the maps
in Section III of this report.
Approximately one-half of the land in North Richland Hills is
drained by Big Fossil Creek, Little Bear Creek, and their
tributaries. The other one-half is drained by Walker Branch,
Calloway Branch, Mesquite Branch, Mackey Branch and their
tributaries. Big Fossil Creek and Little Bear Creek originate
outside of the corporat~ limits. The remaining branches
originate within the corporate limits of the City.
5
~
.,--,
Man-Made
Features:
~ '--'
''''"-
In the Drainage Master Plan of the City these channels are
proposed for full development. The solution ,of the flood plain
problem will add a significant amount of land area previously
unuseable to the development pool.
The significant feature is the large areas of residential and
commercial development. It is fairly apparent from the growth
rate of the community that residential development will be a
dominant feature of the area.
The available supply of treated water is a factor which can
limit future development and possibly restrict the use of
existing development if the City or its suppliers fail to plan
for the future needs.
To address that issue the City has directed the preparation of
Water and Sewer System Master Plans which detail system needs
, .
to support full development.
Another feature is the transportation infrastructure. Signifi-
cant ground transportation features are the highways and
arterial routes that are primarily based on long standing
routes that were established when the area was still primarily
agricultural. These features will have a major role in
determining the physical appearance of the City in future
years. (See Thoroughfare Map in Section III)
ñ
"
-
'-
--
..
LAND USE
General
Discussion:
Another significant transportation infrastructure component
that will play a role in shaping the community is a railroad
track that bisects the community from the southwest to the
northeast. The areas where this track crosses major auto and
truck routes will be likely candidates for industrial develop-
ment locations. The access to the existing Railroad is
under-utilized. Most existing light industrial uses are
designed around truck transportation.
The remaining significant transportation infrastructure
component is Mangham Airport. Suffice it to say that while
it is providing a transportation service, the existence of the
airport has an inhibiting effect on residential development
in the immediate area. Currently the property involved in the
airport operations has been sold to a developer whose plans
will not include use as an airport. The Commission and the
City Council will be asked to make specific decisions as to
the mix of uses on the Site and what percentage of the current
Industrial Zoning is to be retained.
Analysis of information gathered by the Planning and
Zoning Commission brought out the following points:
o
The most obvious, and as was discussed in the neighborhood
analyses, is that North Richland Hills is mostly undeveloped.
7
'-'
"-
'-
Even in the developed areas, there are large tracts and
numerous lots that have not been utilized.
o
A comparison of the land use map with a City zoning map shows
some indications of over-zoning. Over-zoning has been defined
by the American Society of Planning Officials (now merged with
the American Institute of Planners into the American Planning
Association) as "zoning more land area than can reasonably be
expected to be developed for a particular use or zoning for an
excessive population. Thus, over-zoning for industry would
permit industry to locate in scattered areas and preclude land
from being used for other purposes. This is one of the results
of not having or not using a land use plan."
o
The map also shows some evidence of spot zoning, another result
of not following a land use plan. Spot zoning is a relatively
small area zoned differently from the zoning of the surrounding
. .
area usually for an incompatible use and to favor the owner of
a particular piece or pieces of property. Spot-zoning can be
invalidated by the courts when it violates (a) the intent of
the comprehensive plan (b) the requirements of state enabling
legislation. The 'spotness' is in the arbitrary and
inappropriate nature of the zoning change rather than, as is
commonly believed, in the size of land area. The use of many
flexible techniques such as floating zones or conditional
rezoning have been prohibited by the courts, the argument being
that conferring narrow development permission is a form of spot
A
'-.
Urban Design
Definition:
-'-.
Positive
Aspects:
-
zoning. Special small-area zoning districts, however, have
been upheld where the comprehensive plan demonstrates a special
need, such as for a historic area or to preserve a sensitive
natural area.
Urban design is that branch of planning primarily concerned
with the functional and visual relationships between people and
their physical environment and ways in which those relation-
ships can be consciously improved.
Urban design has surfaced as an issue in North Richland Hills.
It is a difficult issue to address because so much of urban
design is subjective. But there have been a number of specific
urban design issues that have been raised by the citizens.
In general, it has been expressed that there are very
attractive portions of the City, such as some residential
subdivisions; that the many drainage areas offer opportunities
for open space; that much of the City is undeveloped and there
is opportunity to assure that new development reflects the
City's desire for attractive and functional development; the
citizens recognize the desirability of high urban design
standards.
~
'.
Improvements: There are a number of specific items that have been mentioned
as needing improvement. There will be some overlap between
--
some of these items such as urban design issues and transpor-
tation, housing and land use. These specific issues also
relate to existing situations and to situations that may exist
in the future.
o Uncoordinated street pattern. In several subdivisions,
the streets do not align with streets in adjacent areas
or deadend without provisions being made to continue
them in future development.
o Too much on-street vehicle storage
o Commercial and Industrial land uses not screened from
"--
adjacent residential uses
o Some property appears to be overzoned
, .
o Too much unscreened outdoor storage
o Some real estate appears to be deteriorating
o Some undeveloped properties have become unofficial dump
grounds
Housing
Discussion:
Concerns rCBarding housing can genp.rally be related to either
--
the number of units or aspects relating to the physical
attributes of housing.
10
'-
----
-
The housing concerns in North Richland Hills are primarily
related to the physical aspects: conditions (sound, deterior-
ating, etc.); type (single family, duplex, apartment, etc.);
density (how many dwelling units per acre); unit size (how many
square feet per unit); location (where are the units and what
is adjacent to them).
Most of these concerns can be expressed in terms relating to
the quality of the individual units and of the neighborhoods
created by groups of homes. The purpose of this planning
activity is to identify housing situations that can be
improved.
The following is intended to address those matters that have
been expressed by the citizens and have been noted by the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
o
There are several concerns relating to some of the older (30
years plus) existing housing. There are some isolated pockets
of deteriorating housing units. There is concern that this
deterioration might spread to adjacent property, or that it
would adversely affect adjacent housing.
o
There are concerns regarding conversion of residential areas to
commercial or industrial uses. Those concerns expressed here
are for those areas where spot commercial development can have
a negative effect on adjacent housing.
11
· .'
'-'
'-
o
Some of the medium aged housing (20 years ±) is also having
problems with encroachment from commercial and industrial
activities.
o
There is also some apprehension regarding new housing. Most of
these questions are regarding how can the quality of new single
family subdivisions be insured. There seems to be an equation
of size of unit and lot to the quality. This opinion is held
even though housing costs are pushing the price of an average
single fam~ly unit beyond affordability for most families.
Many feel that smaller units on smaller lots will inevitably
create areas of substandard quality.
o
There are also concerns regarding multifamily units. Most
agree that there is already too much multifamily development
under way at this time and would like to severely limit any
more multifamily zoning.
Transportation/
Thoroughfare
Introduction: Transportation is a major issue in North Richland Hills. It is
also a complex issue in that it involves various types of
ground transportation.
Automobile:
.-
A discussion of automobile travel from a government perspective
is a discussion of streets and highways. With auto travel, it
is generally the responsibility of the traveller to provide the
vehicle. It is the responsibility of various levels of govern-
ment to provide the surface on which vehicles may ride.
1 ?
'0
--
',-
'--
'.
Recommen-
dations:
Public
Transit:
During the analysis of automobile travel, all input from the
citizens emphasized concern on how rapid is the pace of
congestion.
The most obvious is the congestion on all major routes through
the City and at the borders. It is the opinion of the citizens
and the Planning and Zoning Commission that all routes with a
state designation are being utilized at or above capacity at
this time.
Presently congestion is centered around SH 26 on either side of
Loop 820; FH 1938 as it intersects with SH 26; Glenview Drive
at Loop 820; Glenview Drive at intersection of SH 26; and Rufe
Snow Drive at Loop 820 and the area immediately north of the
intersection in the Commercial area.
Although the North Central Texas Council of Governments
Thoroughfare Plan has been in unofficial use, it is imperative
that the City adopt a Thoroughfare Plan and begin reserving
right-of-way for future arterials. If not, development
undoubtedly will occur in the path of the arterials and the
City will then only be able to build thoroughfares at great
costs. The City has some catching-up to do in constructing
needed arterial facilities where development is now complete,
as is indicated by the Thoroughfare Plan includedin this
report.
There has been very little interest shown at this time for a
public transit system. As a practical matter, funding
1"3-
-
Rail :
CITY SERVICES
Public
Works:
',--
--
limitations and the high cost will limit the future of a public
transit system.
North Richland Hills is bisected by a rail line. The line is
important from an industrial development standpoint. The one
rail line is probably sufficient to provide the City with rail
service required for a reasonable level of industrial
development. The probable location for such rail oriented
industrial .development occurs where the rail line is also close
to potential truck routes.
Analysis of input from the City Staff and citizens leads the
Planning and Zoning Commission to the conclusion that the
present staff and supporting facilities are totally inadequate
at this time. Several factors are:
°Inadequate office and storage space
°Inadequate number of trained professional inspectors
°Lack of on-board professional city engineers and planners
°Inadequate number of support personnel to adequately
process zoning and platting cases
14
".
-
- "---
-
'.
Fire
Department:
Police
Department:
°Scattered maintenance facilities leading to
inefficiencies
As the City grows it is imperative that the City provide
adequate health and fire protection service to the citizens and
business establishments. Therefore in the opinion of the
Planning and Zoning Commission the City should adopt the plan
that has b~en developed by the City Fire Department. Key
requirements are:
°Fire Station to serve Northeast sector of the City
°Fire Station to serve Northwest sector of the City
°Fire Training Complex
°Animal Control Complex
°Ambulance Services
There is a need at this time and in the future to increase
personnel and to provide additional supporting facilities. Key
requirements are:
°Additional office and storage areas
1 ')
'.
.,-
- .'--
'-
'.
Library:
City Cable
Television:
Parks and
Recreation:
°Additional parking for police vehicles
°Increase in the number of training police officers will
be required as the population of the City grows
°Lack of proper traffic engineering
The plan submitted by the Library Staff appears to be well
thought out and the Planning and Zoning Commission supports the
removal of the Library function from City Hall to a stand alone
Library facility centrally located.
The Planning and Zoning Commission received little input from
the citizens concerning City Cable Television.
The Parks and Recreation Board presented the currently adopted
Park Plan. Recommendations of that report include:
°
Retention of existing parks:
Richfield
Northfield
Fossil Creek
Norich
°
Enlargement of Richfield Park if additional land can
be obtained
16
o
Construction of a central community recreational
center
-
Subsequent to adoption of the report the City conducted a
survey of citizens interest and found special interest in
additional items not in the parks:
o
A municipal swimming pool
o
Additional non-structured recreational facilities
Citizens input received by Planning and Zoning indicates strong
interest in a municipal pool and non-structured recreational
facilities such as bike and hiking paths, picnic facilities,
park benches and swings.
'--
The existing Park Plan for the City indicates a need for
approximately 45 additional acres of park land.
'--
17
'.
"
--
- '--
'--
COMPREHENSIVE }~STER PLAN
SECTION 11 PLAN POLICIES
INTRODUCTION
The Plan Policies Section of this document sets out goals and
policies regarding the existing and future needs and
aspirátions of the City of North Richland Hills as identified
by the City Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and
the citizens of the City.
The City of North Richland Hills is currently experiencing
significant strength in both its economy and overall growth
pattern. It is the intent of the City Council and the Planning
and Zoning Commission that every effort be made to encourage,
sustain and improve upon these strengths. At the same time the
growth pattern which is a product of this activity must be
coordinated and directed.
The following areas are identified as those in which the
efforts of the City should be directed in achieving the overall
goals stated above.
lR
1. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
\-
The overall health of a City is normally measured by its
economic activity. This activity takes place on two levels
which are of direct benefit to the citizens of the City.
The first of these is the level of commercial and/or industrial
activity. On this level a positive growth factor will provide
necessary services for the citizens and an employment base for
the City's ,economy. A secondary benefit of this activity is the
increase in sales tax revenue which follows increased business
growth.
- '--
The second area is the development and growth activity level in
both the Commercial/Industrial sector and in the residential
sector of the City. Again, a positive growth factor creates
economic health by adding value to the City tax base and adding
additional population to the City.
As stated earlier, the City of North. Richland Hills is
experiencing a positive growth factor in both these areas at
the present time. The Planning and Zoning Commission and the
City Council recognize the value of these growth factors. A
continuing positive growth pattern is both desirable and
essential. However, the intent of the City Council and the
Planning and Zoning Commission is that in encouraging the
continuation of these growth patterns every effort will be made
to maintain a balance between the various economic components.
'-
19
',-,
- '--
2. LAND USE
'--
Currently the development pattern of the City of North Richland
Hills is biased toward retail development both in current tax
income and in ongoing development activity. It is assumed that
the retail businesses created by this massive expansion will
continue to be an active and viable part of the community in
the forseeable future. It is the intent of the Planning and
Zoning Commission and the City Council to support the
Commercial activity of the City recognizing the significant
role it is playing in the economic health of the community.
The City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission also
recognize the responsibility they have to provide an economic
balance of activity in the community. To that end the City
will encourage the full utilization of the industrial zoned
property within the City. The establishment of a sound
industrial segment of the City's economy can be used to offset
the rapid changes which can occur in the commercial/retail
portion of the City's economy.
. .
According to current statistics approximately one-half of the
land area of the City of North Richland Hills is still
undeveloped. The direction in which the future land use of
that undeveloped area is pointed will be a major determinant of
the overall character and texture of the City for many years to
come.
20
'-
The Future Land Use Plan contained in this report is a
compilation of the expectations of the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council as to the direction of growth
in the City for the next several decades. It is the intent
of the Commission and Council that the Land Use Plan be the
basis for decision making in the guidance of that future
development.
The proposed Land Use Plan makes several basic assumptions
about the ~ity as it exists today in projecting the future
development.
(1) Existing uses in place will remain stable and viable for the
most part into the future.
- ,,"--
(2)
The Economic Development goals as stated in this report will
continue to reflect the expressed desires of the majority of
the citizens.
(3) The existing and proposed transportation facilities, i.e.,
thoroughfares for the use of automobile traffic, will continue
to be the primary mode of travel in the City.
"--'
A balance of uses is proposed. The Land Use Plan assumes that
the demand for low density, Single-Family property will
continue to be the majority of the City's development.
However. a sufficient amount of Commercial. Industrial, and
higher density residential (multi-family) areas are proposed to
satisfy the perceived economic development needs of the City as
? 1
..
--
-'-.
'-.
expressed in the earlier Economic Development discussion.
The Land Use Plan also addresses the concerns of the disparity
or non-compatibility of certain types of uses. Where possible
the proposed use areas have been placed with the idea of
providing separation or buffering between disparate uses.
This Future Land Use Plan is intended to be used as a guide for
future zoning and development decisions. The areas outlined in
the Future ,Land Use Plan are not exact nor or they dimensioned.
They cannot be identified as designating a specific parcel of
land. The intent of the plan is to provide a general outline of
each use type and to project the pattern of growth as it
relates to the overall development pattern of the City. In the
administration of the Plan it is also not anticipated that the
Commission and the City Council will undertake a comprehensive
rezoning effort covering the entire city. Rather, as any
development is proposed the Commission and the City Council
will approve, disapprove, or modify those proposals based on
their conformance or compatibility with the Land Use Plan.
REDEVELOPMENT
Within the City at the present time there are existing
co~~ercial and residential areas which are likely candidates
for redevelopment. Primarily these areas are situated in older
~ections of the City where circumstances of time, type of
construction, and/or changing use patterns in the area create
pressure for change. Redevelopment of these areas can occur in
22
"--
-,,--
--
one of two possible ways. First, the existing structures can
be renovated, remodeled, or reconstructed to current building
codes for the proposed new use. Second, the existing structure
may be totally demolished and a new structure raised to serve
the new use.
Within the framework of the proposed Land Use Plan this type of
re-use of existing resources will be encouraged.
3.
TRANSPORTATION/THOROUGHFARES
As stated earlier in this report one of the basic assumptions
of the preparation of the Comprehensive Master Plan is that the
individually-owned automobile will continue to be the dominant
mode of transportation in the forseeable future of the City.
Recognizing that fact the City Council has commissioned the
firm of PAWA-Winkleman and Associates to prepare a Master
Thoroughfare Plan of the City. This Thoroughfare Plan is to be
an outline of all of the major streets of the City both
existing and proposed. Included with the plan of the streets
is to be provided a functional classification system which will
designate the size and type of street to be placed in each of
the designated locations.
The basic objective of the Thoroughfare Plan is to provide a
complete circulation system throughout the City. This proposed
plan must both dictate and respond to the elements of the
'>3
Future Land Use Plan of the City. That is, the system must, by
necessity, address both new developing areas of the City and
the existing fully developed areas.
"--
In the approval of all new subdivisions the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council will utilize the Thoroughfare
Plan to direct developers in the requirement for additional
Right-Of-Way on existing streets and the necessity for
providing new streets on alignments as dictated by the Plan.
The developer will be responsible for construction of the
required streets in any instance where the street is wholly
within the proposed subdivision, bounding the subdivision, or
providing major access to the subdivision. The City Council,
in order to encourage the construction of the needed
,
thoroughfares on a timely basis will participate in the
- '-
oversize costs of the Thoroughfares. It is the intent of the
City Council and the Commission that, as much as is possible,
the thoroughfare system will be constructed at the same time
that development occurs in an area.
, .
The City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission also
recognize the absolute necessity to upgrade and improve the
existing system in existing developed areas. The providing of
and the improvement to Thoroughfares in developed areas will
accomplish two purposes. First, in areas where previous
commercial developments have overloaded existing systems
traffic jams can be alleviated. Second, improvements in
outdated and deteriorated streets which are functioning as
'--
24
"'-"
thoroughfares without the proper design capacities will improve
the accessibility to existing neighborhoods and aid in
sustaining these neighborhoods as a viable part of the
community. These type of improvements in existing areas
require specific committments of city funds, such as bond
programs, and an aggressive approach in pursuing funding from
other governmental sources such as the State Department of
Highways and Public Transportation, Tarrant County and/or the
adjacent cities.
- .'-...-
Very little has been said in this report or in the report
accompanying the Master Thoroughfare Plan regarding any other
alternative transportation methods such as Mass Transit or
Light Rail Transit. In the estimation of the City's consultant
and the City Staff the possibility of the City of North
Richland Hills participating in these types of alternative
transportation at a planning level is extremely remote. The
only possible route for any mass transit medium to be available
for City citizens use would seem to be as an off-shoot of
whatever system the larger cities develop in the future.
4. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE
Just as the Thoroughfare Plan provides the basic outline of the
City by providing the transportation network, the Basic
Utilities, water and sewer, dictate how the development of the
City is to proceed. The City of North Richland Hills currently
'-
')c;
has an adequate network of both water and sewer facilities.
However, to insure that the system will continue to perform
-, .
with a high degree of reliability even at a full development
level, the City has contracted for a Master Plan of both the
Water and the Sewer systems of the City. The purpose for both
- ''-.-
plans is to designate areas of the City in which additional
facilities will be needed to support the full development
improvements which could possiblily be built. It is on the
basis of these documents that the City will work with the
developers to install the major transmission, distribution, and
collection facilities necessary to serve the overall city. It
is the intent of City Council and Planning and Zoning
Commission that in the review of every proposed development in
the City the needs of the overall water and sewer system will
be addressed by requiring the developers to install the
oversize mains called for in the Master Plans for both water
and sewer. Under current subdivision criteria the city will
participate in the oversize costs of those required systems.
In addition, in fully developed areas the City will pursue an
active improvement and upgrading of facilities program. The
providing of proper utilities will enhance and support the
maintenance of existing neighborhoods. This in turn will
extend their useable life and keep them a viable part of the
community.
'--
The City has also contracted for and is receiving a Drainage
Master Plan for the entire City. This plan identifies all of
'Ie.
~
- ,,--.
5. HOUS ING
\-
the major drainage systems within the City and proposes a
minimum design criteria for each major channel required to
contain the 100 Year Frequency Flood. In addition, the minor
systems which contribute the run-off to these channels have
have been investigated and minimum design criteria have been
established for these systems. It is the intent of the City
Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission that the data
and design parameters contained in the Master Drainage Plan
be required as a minimum on all proposed developments within
the City.
The City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission also
recognize the necessity for improvements to existing drainage
systems within the established areas of the City.
Accomplishing the improvements in these areas of the City will
require specific committment of funds by the City. The
expectation is that priority issues will be developed for
future bond programs. Additionally the City will investigate
any alternatives abailable through other governmental
agencies, such as the Corps of Engineers, for aid in funding
these improvements.
Currently the City has a good crossection of types of housing
stock. Some concern has been expressed that in isolated areas
there are pockets of very old (30 plus years) structures which
cannot meet the existing codes and are deteriorating. The
location and number of these units is not yet a major problem.
However. the City cannot automatically assume that property
27
-
owners and the marketplace needs of the City will always
protect and/or replace existing housing stock. A vigorous
active program of Code Enforcement is necessary to assure that
older neighborhoods continue to be fully utilized. As stated
earlier in this report some areas of the City will be under
pressure to redevelop or convert housing units to other uses.
tihile some conversion is appropriate, the wholesale conversion
of established neighborhoods will be avoided. Any significant
efforts toward major conversion must be evaluated in terms of
its effect ~n the Land Use Plan of the City.
The assumption that all new housing being constructed will be
of such quality that it will assure long term value and
permanent occupancy is not necessarily accurate. It is the
function of the City to ensure that specific controls are
maintained and specific levels are met. The quality of housing
\...... .
construction will be in direct response to the level of
enforcement which the City exercises over its adopted Building
Codes.
Some discussion has been raised regarding the relationship
between minimum lot size and minimum house size to the long
term quality of construction. While it is to be expected that
a larger investment by a builder in both lot costs and required
minimum house costs will produce a higher value unit, it is
also true that this approach will produce less housing units in
any given subdivision. Therefore, these units will be
available to fewer people. Without the same level of required
'-
28
inspections as the smaller units no guarantee can be given that
any significant improvement in the quality of construction can
be expected. It is up to the City to strike a balance of
housing types which will generate sufficient housing stock to
support the crossection of population expected to reside within
the City.
".........,
--..
2q
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - AUGUST 12, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
\..-.
1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order August 12, 1985,
at 7:30 p.m.
2. Present:
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
Virginia Moody
Harold Newman
...
Staff :
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Gene Riddle
Rex McEntire
Lee Maness
Richard Royston
Richard Albin
Marjorie Nash
Don Bowen
-<
....
.....
Press:
Duward Bean
Mark England
Absent:
Jim Kenna
Jim Ramsey
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilwoman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Public Works Director
Attorney
Finance Director
Director of Planning
City Engineer
Planning & Zoning Member
Planning & Zoning Member
Northeast Chronicle
Mid Cities
Councilman
Councilman
"-
3. Councilwoman Hinkle introduced Jack Shepard, who gave
the invocation.
4. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
approve the minutes of the regular meeting of July 22, 1985.
Mayor Echols stated that on page 11 the name should be
Carlene.
Motion carried 4-0; Councilman Newman abstaining due to
absence.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to move Items 44 & 40 up on the agenda and they would become
Items 6A and 6B.
\"--,,
Motion carried 5-0.
.....
'--
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 22, 1985
APPROVED
August 12, 1985
Page 4
~
Mr. Line stated there was an election in 1980 for one
million dollars for parks and recreation. Mr. Line
stated it depended on who you talked to; some say it was
for a pool and others say that was not the purpose.
Mr. Line stated he had researched it and had not been
able to find any authoritative source on what the one
million dollars was actually for.
Ms. Brown asked what the citizens could do to get a
swimming pool.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated there were 17 citizens on the
Task Force Committee who set priorities. Mayor Pro Tem
Davis stated that some of the citizens wanted the
drainage problem solved so their homes would not flood
and others wanted street improvements. Mayor Pro Tem
Davis stated the Council put a lot of faith in the Task
Force to find out what the city's immediate needs were.
Ms. Brown asked if the citizens could ask for a special
election for a swimming pool.
Mayor Echols stated that would be an initiative which
the City Charter did not provide for.
--
Councilman Fisher stated the Council did put their faith
and concerns in the Task Force Committee to hear what
the citizens had to say and the priorities they wanted
in the City. Councilman Fisher stated he felt the
Council should stand firm on the Task Force Committee's
recommendation.
Ms. Brown stated that was a lot of money for a library
when the City already had one.
Mayor Echols stated that one reason for relocating the
library was to utilize the space for the Police
Department.
Ms. Vonnie Waiser, 7704 Perkins, appeared before the
Council.
Ms. Waiser stated what irritated her was that no one on
the Task Force was for the swimming pool. Ms. Waiser
stated they had a petition with 500 signatures in favor
of the pool and no one on the Task Force signed the
petition. Ms. Waiser stated that in her opinion that
was biased to her.
Mayor Echols stated he felt the Task Force did the best
for the most immediate needs of the city.
Ms. Edith Bartley, 7424 Continental Trail, appeared
before the Council.
l
'-.-
- ,-,"-
-
Ms. Bartley stated as she understood it the Task
Force did not specify what streets would be on the bond
program. Ms. Bartley asked if the city would release a
list of streets in regards to Item 1 on the bond issue.
Mayor Echols stated that there was a preliminary list of
streets.
Mr. Line stated there was a list of streets available to
the public.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that neither the Task Force
nor the Council was anti-pool. Mayor Pro Tem Davis
stated the Task Force felt that the immediate needs of
the city were priority. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he
hoped the citizens would support the bond issue.
Ms. Linda Morgan, 7533 North Richland Blvd., appeared
before the Council.
Ms. Morgan wanted assurance that Holiday Lane would not
be on the bond issue.
Mayor Echols stated he could not give any assurances,
but at the present time it was not on the list.
Motion carried 5-0.
7.
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Mr. Chuck Owen, owner, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Owen stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission
had voted favorably on this request and asked the Council
to also approve this request.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if there was an existing home
on the tract.
Mr. Owen replied yes.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the house would be vacated
and if it would be overall commercial.
Mr. Owen replied no, one acre where the house stood
would be left R-3.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
August 12, 1985
Page 5
PZ 85-63 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
COCO VENTURE TO
REZONE PORTION OF
TRACT 10D, J.H.
BARLOUGH SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 130 FROM R-2
(SINGLE FAMILY) TO
C-2 (COMMERCIAL)
(LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF DAVIS
BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF
COLLEGE HILL ASSEMBLY
OF GOD CHURCH
8.
Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis,
to approve Ordinance No. 1256.
'-..-
Motion carried 5-0.
9.
Mr. Line advised the Council that the City had received a
letter from the applicant asking that this case be withdrawn.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve the request for withdrawal.
Motion carried 5-0.
10.
11.
Mr. Line advised that there was a question of unpaid taxes
on this property. Mr. Line stated that the Planning & Zoning
Commission had approved the request subject to the taxes being
paid before going to Council, and as of this date, they
had not been paid.
- "--
Mr. Marty Cloin, 15206 Woodchester, San Antonio, representing
the applicant, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Cloin stated he was aware of this issue and the seller
had assured them that the taxes would be paid. Mr. Cloin
stated he felt that it was a bookkeeping problem and would
be taken care of.
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Cloin if this request was approved
in whose name would the permit be issued.
Mr. Cloin replied the permit would be issued to Joe Walton.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to please come forward.
No one appeared.
-
12. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher,
to approve Ordinance No. 1257 to be in the name of Joe Walton
and non-transferrable and subject to the payment of
delinquent taxes and the Ordinance not being signed until
payment was received.
August 12, 1985
Page 6
ORDINANCE NO. 1256
APPROVED
PZ 85-65 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
R & G ASSOCIATES TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT lA, JOHN C.
YATES SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1753, FROM
R-7 MF (MULTI-FAMILY)
TO C-1 (COMMERCIAL)
(LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF WATAUGA ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 500
FEET FROM RUFE SNOW
DRIVE)
WITHDRAWN
ORDINANCE NO. 1246
WITHDRAWN
PZ 85-77 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
DIAMOND SHAMROCK
COMPANY TO REZONE
PART OF TRACT 3A,
WILLIAM MANN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1010, FROM
C-1 (COMMERCIAL) TO
C-l SU (SPECIFIC USE
- SALE OF BEER FOR
OFF-PREMISE
CONSUMPTION) (LOCATED
ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF HIGHTOWER
DRIVE AND RUFE SNOW
DRIVE)
ORDINANCE NO. 1257
APPROVED
'"--
13. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Stembridge stated that his client wished to develop
the property with R-2 zoning.
Councilwoman Moody asked if the right-of-way for Starnes
Road had been granted.
Mr. Stembridge replied the right-of-way would be granted
at the time of platting.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
14. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman,
to approve Ordinance No. 1258.
Motion carried 5-0.
--
15.
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing on PZ 85-80, PZ 85-81,
PZ 85-82, & PZ 85-83 and called for anyone wishing to speak
in favor of these requests to please come forward.
Mr. Burk Collins, 5228 Rufe Snow Drive, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Collins stated that because of the high cost of developing
this tract of land, it had been sold numerous times.
Mr. Collins stated this property was located in the flood
plain and he would be required to put in a concrete lined
channel at a cost of $500,000. Mr. Collins stated he felt
this would be the best use of the property. Mr. Collins
stated that he would also develop Amundson Road adjacent
to his property.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to these requests to please come forward.
Mr. V. L. Gibson, 8333 Odell Street, appeared before the
Council.
.-
Mr. Gibson stated he felt the Council should postpone
this because the people in the area were not notified.
Mr. Gibson stated that a lot of people in the
Stonybrooke Addition were against these requests.
August 12, 1985
Page 7
PZ 85-79 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
JEFF MARSH TO REZONE
TRACT 4A, W.D. BARNES
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 146,
FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO R-2 (SINGLE
FAMILY) (LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF
STARNES ROAD AND
BOUNDED ON THE NORTH
AND EAST BY KINGSWOOD
ESTATES)
ORDINANCE NO. 1258
APPROVED
PZ 85-80 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
BURK COLLINS TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 1, T. K. MARTIN
SURVEY, ABSTRACT
1055, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO R-2
(SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED NORTH OF THE
ST. LOUIS AND
SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD
AND SOUTH OF THE
STONYBROOKE ADDITION)
August 12, 1985
Page 8
'-
Mr. Line advised Mr. Gibson that unless it was an Appeal
Hearing, property owners were not notified.
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Gibson if he was representing the
people in the Stonybrooke Addition.
Mr. Gibson stated no, only the ones on Odell Street.
Councilman Fisher asked Mr. Gibson if he objected to the
proj ect.
Mr. Gibson stated he felt the Council should hold a re-
hearing and notify the people.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the Council was aware of the
opposition; they had the Planning & Zoning Commission's
recommendation and also a copy of the minutes when the
request went before the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Mr. Gibson stated his concern was the increase in
traffic on Stonybrooke and Odell that this development
would create.
Councilwoman Moody stated the developer planned on
constructing another street leading out of the
subdivision which would help the traffic flow.
-...........
Mr. Gibson stated he felt there were too many duplexes
and was hoping it would be zoned R-2. Mr. Gibson stated
there was also a drainage problem in the area.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the drainage would be taken
care of at the time the property was platted and the
developer would also have to meet all of the city
ordinances.
Mr. Don Chaille, 8405 Timberline Court, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Chaille stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission
did approve all five zoning requests and he felt the
traffic problem had been resolved.
Mr. Robert Chaison, 1606 Cypress Drive, Irving, Texas,
owner of the property in question, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Chaison stated that approving this request would
give the city an opportunity to improve the drainage
problems and the reconstruction of a portion of Amundson
Road.
-
'-
18.
--
19.
20.
-
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols
closed the Public Hearing.
16. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Ordinance Nos. 1259, 1260, 1261, and 1262.
Motion carried 5-0.
17.
August 12, 1985
Page 9
ORDINANCE NO. 1259
APPROVED
PZ 85-81 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
BURK COLLINS TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 1, T.K. MARTIN
SURVEY, ABSTRACT
1055, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO R-2
(SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED ALONG THE
ST. LOUIS AND
SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD
TRACKS NORTH OF
GLENANN ADDITION AND
SOUTH OF STONYBROOKE
ADDITION)
ORDINANCE NO. 1260
APPROVED
PZ 85-82 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
BURK COLLINS TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 1, T.K. MARTIN
SURVEY, ABSTRACT
1055, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO R-8
(SINGLE FAMILY
DETACHED ZERO LOT
LINE) (LOCATED
GENERALLY NORTH OF
THE ST. LOUIS AND
SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD
AND SOUTH OF
STONYBROOKE ADDITION)
ORDINANCE NO. 1261
APPROVED
21.
',,--
22.
23. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
Wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Frank Bradley, owner, appeared before the Council.
-'-
Mr. Bradley stated that this tract contained 2.0 acres and
the purpose for the rezoning was to construct a second
residence.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
24. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman,
to approve Ordinance No. 1263.
Motion carried 5-0.
25. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. David Barfield, representing Roger and Joan Hanson,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Barfield stated this would be an addition to the existing
Nob Hill Subdivision and would meet all of the requirements
of the existing Nob Hill Subdivision.
-
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
oPposition to this request to please come forward.
There be~ng no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the
Public Hearing.
August 12, 1985
Page 10
PZ 85-83 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
BURK COLLINS TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 1, T.K. MARTIN
SURVEY, ABSTRACT
1055, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO
R-5-D (DUPLEX)
(LOCATED GENERALLY
NORTH OF THE ST.
LOUIS AND
SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD
AND SOUTH OF
STONYBROOKE ADDITION)
ORDINANCE NO. 1262
APPROVED
PZ 85-84 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
FRANK S. BRADLEY TO
REZONE PART OF TRACT
4B3, J. CONDRA
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 311,
FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO R-l (SINGLE
FAMILY) (LOCATED ON
THE EAST S IDE OF
DOUGLAS LANE,
APPROXIMATELY 303
FEET NORTH OF
HIGHTOWER DRIVE)
ORDINANCE NO. 1263
APPROVED
PZ 85-85 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
ROGER AND JOAN HANSON
TO REZONE TRACTS 3,
3K, 3M, 3H, 3Q, 3U,
3R, 3S & 3T, T.K.
MARTIN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1055, FROM
AG (AGRICULTURE) TO
R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
CRANE ROAD AND
AMUNDSON DRIVE)
Motion carried 5-0.
"--
26. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Ordinance No. 1264.
27. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Jesse Vielman, 68~5 Manhattan Boulevard, Fort Worth,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Vielman stated they planned on having 84 units with
rear parking and screening fences between the single family
residences and the townhomes. Mr. Vielman stated the
drainage problem would also be solved.
Mayor Echols asked if the stipulations recommended by the
Planning and Zoning Commission had been taken care of.
Mr. Vielman stated they were getting their engineering plans
together and the items would be provided on the preliminary
plat.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
',--
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
28. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to approve Ordinance No. 1265.
Motion carried 5-0.
29. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
-
30. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Ordinance No. 1266.
August 12, 1985
Page 11
ORDINANCE NO. 1264
APPROVED
PZ 85-86 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
CENTURY BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
TO REZONE PART OF
BLOCK 4, NORTHRIDGE
ADDITION, FROM R-6-T
(TOWNHOMES) TO R-6-T
PD (TOWNHOMES PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT) (LOCATED
AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF BOB DRIVE
AND HARWOOD ROAD)
ORDINANCE NO. 1265
APPROVED
PZ 85-87 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TO REZONE A PORTION
OF TRACT lA, J. YATES
SURVEY, ABSTRACT
1753, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO U
( INSTITUTIONAL
DISTRICT) (LOCATED
SOUTH OF WATAUGA
ROAD, EAST OF RUFE
SNOW DRIVE, AND
BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH
BY THE RAILROAD)
ORDINANCE NO. 1266
APPROVED
Motion carried 5-0.
.~
Mayor Echols called a recess.
Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order and the same
Council members and Staff were present as recorded at the
beginning of the meeting.
31. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Marion Massey, Attorney, representing the applicant,
appeared before the Council
Mr. Massey stated he was representing the applicant and
the purpose of this zoning request was to allow a small
tract that had become isolated from the applicant's main
project site because of the realignment of a street be
utilized as single family lots conforming to the
adjacent development.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
'-
32. Councilman Newman moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to approve Ordinance No. 1267.
Motion carried 5-0.
33. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve PS 85-40 subject to the engineer's comments and
the city participating in the oversizing of the drainage.
Motion carried 5-0.
*34.
-
August 12, 1985
Page 12
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
PZ 85-88 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
RICHMOND BAY
DEVELOPMENT TO REZONE
PART OF TRACT 1, W.
A. TRIMBLE SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1520, FROM
PD (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT) TO R-1
(SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF MEADOW LAKES
DRIVE AT THE TESCO
RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT)
ORDINANCE NO. 1267
APPROVED
PS 85-40 REQUEST OF
DON STORM (BROWNSTONE
HOMES) TO REPLAT LOTS
11-22, BLOCK 7, LOTS
1-36, BLOCK 14,
SMITHFIELD ACRES
ADDITION (LOCATED
EAST OF LOWERY LANE
AND NORTH OF TURNER
DRIVE)
APPROVED
PS 85-45 REQUEST OF
HARSTON GRAVEL
COMPANY TO REPLAT
LOTS 5R, SRI, AND
5R2, BLOCK 3,
INDUSTRIAL PARK
ADDITION (LOCATED
BETWEEN BROWNING
COURT AND BROWNING
DRIVE ALONG WULIGAR
WAY)
APPROVED
*35.
.,,--
*36.
37. Mr. Line advised this was not a Public Hearing; that the
Council needed to set a date for the Public Hearing.
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to set the Public Hearing for August 26th, at 7:30 p.m.
Motion carried 5-0.
*38.
'-
*39.
41. Mr. Line presented the following proposed use of
revenue sharing: purchase of a modular ambulance unit
and all associated equipment for the fire department,
$54,000; computer system for finance, $67,000; total
proposed use $121,000.
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to approve the proposed use of revenue sharing.
Motion carried 5-0.
-
August 12, 1985
Page 13
PS 85-48 & PS 85-49
REQUEST OF CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT
1, BLOCK 1, CIVIC
CENTRE ADDITION.
THIS FINAL PLAT
COVERS THE MUNICIPAL
COMPLEX SITE ON
WATAUGA ROAD
APPROVED
GN 85-70 TRANSFER OF
FUNDS IN CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
APPROVED
GN 85-71 PUBLIC
HEARING - OPERATING
BUDGET
GN 85-72 BANK
DEPOSITORY BIDS
APPROVED
GN 85-73 ORDINANCE
NO. 1269, FINANCING
OF FIRE DEPARTMENT
EQUIPMENT
APPROVED
GN 85-75 PROPOSED USE
PUBLIC HEARING
APPROVED
August 12, 1985
Page 14
*42.
GN 85-76 APPROVAL OF
PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ANIMAL CONTROL
SHELTER AND PUBLIC
WORKS/UTILITY SERVICE
CENTER
APPROVED
'-
43. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to reappoint Hans Kossler and Harold Schubert for two year
terms to the Board of Adjustments.
GN 85-77 APPOINTMENTS
TO BOARDS &
COMMISSIONS
Motion carried 5-0.
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis,
to reappoint Orville Baker, Joe Coulson, John Larriviere,
Robert Skinner, Gerald Stewart to the Board of Appeals and
to appoint Erick Hill as an Alternate to the Board of Appeals.
Motion carried 5-0.
Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis,
to appoint Joe Hallford to replace George Tucker who had
resigned, reappoint Marjorie Nash, and appoint Carole Flippo
as an Alternate to the Planning & Zoning Commission.
-"- Motion carried 5-0.
*45. PAY 85-32 CALLOWAY
ACRES STREET &
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
PAY ESTIMATE #9 &
FINAL
APPROVED
*46. PAY 85-33 MORGAN
MEADOWS EAST DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS PARTIAL
PAY ESTIMATE /12
APPROVED
*47. PAY 85-34 WATAUGA
SEWER TRUNK LINE
PHASE I PARTIAL PAY
ESTIMATE /13
APPROVED
*48.
PAY 85-35 HARWOOD
ROAD STREET AND
DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS, PAY
ESTIMATE /14
APPROVED
-
--
*49.
*50.
*51.
*52.
*53.
-,-,
--
54. Ms. Linda Morgan, 7533 North Richland Blvd., appeared
before the Council
Ms. Morgan stated she would like to thank the City for
the policeman that had been on Holiday Lane the last
few weeks. Ms. Morgan stated she had learned that there
had been 62 citations issued on Holiday Lane in July,
and if Holiday was widened there would be a bigger
problem.
Mayor Echols stated they did not intend to change the
speed limit on Holiday Lane.
Ms. Morgan asked what the City intended to do about
Lola, were they going to put the stop sign back up.
Mr. Line stated the City was planning to install a
traffic signal at this location prior to the opening
of school.
August 12, 1985
Page 15
PAY 85-36 GLENVIEW
DRIVE STREET AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
PAY ESTIMATE 114
APPROVED
PAY 85-37 HEWITT
STREET PAVING &
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
PAY ESTIMATE 111
APPROVED
PAY 85-38
MISCELLANEOUS PAVING
AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS PAY
ESTIMATE 117
APPROVED
PAY 85-39 PAYMENT FOR
GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPROVED
PAY 85-40 PAYMENT TO
ESTATE OF LOUIS
ENGLER
APPROVED
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
'--
-'--
-
55. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to adjourn.
Motion carried 5-0.
August 12, 1985
Page 16
ADJOURNMENT
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
f
I
L
8/26/85
Council Meeting Date:
Ordinance No. 1110 PZ 85-40
Agenda Number:
r
1
L
Planning and ~.v.lo~nt
Department:
3ubject:
Proposed Thoroughfat:e Plan
L
L
L
At the City Council·s last review of the proposed Tho1;'oughfarePlan the various
recommendations of the plunin,and. Zoning commission ware discussed and the concensus
of the City Council was that ~11 areas of the Plan were acceptable and could be
approved with the exception of the. d.esignation of Starnes Road. The City Counc;l1
. directed the plan back to the C~1.sion with instructionsjto reconsider the designation
of Starnes Road. The City counc11.was·of the opinion that the street would more
properly function as a C2U CollectOr Grade Street west of Davis Boulevard to Rufe Snow
Drive. .
RECOMMENDATION: The Platm1ng. and ~Qning Commission reco..ende4 to the City Council that
the Master Thoroughfare Plan be· adOpted with the revision of Starnes Road from Davis
Boulevard to Rufe Snow Drive tobedesiptated as a C2U Collectcn" Street.
~'-.
I
I
J
I
J
I
1
~
~
I
~ Source of Funds:
I
i . Bonds (GO/Rev.) _
~~¿;;:~iínamœ
I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
I .
L-
finance Review
Acet. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
Page 1 ~f
1
\. ') -'-~
Page 8
P & Z Minutes
August 8, 1985
(
........
....
- "--'
. . ~~
12. PZ 85-40
-..
(
Mr. Collins said he felt the City of
North Richland Hills would suffer
this change is made. He said t y
could restrict mini-warehous to
industrial zoning.
Carry Beck came forwa He said he
and Mr. Warren's b would be
affected by this ange and he felt
the Commissio should reconsider.
said this change was to
the large storage
ware uses and the mini-warehouses.
H said they have no intention to
hange the contractor' s warehousing.
He said this would not affect them.
Mr. Tucker said he would like to see
some change. He would like to take
out the mini warehousing and the large
warehousing but not office ,warehouse.
Mr. Tucker said they could change the
definition.
Mr. Tucker made the motion to
postpone PZ 85-102 and return it to
the City Staff for a change in the
definition to take out the retail and
leave it in C-2. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion
to postpone carried 5-0.
Consideration of Thoroughfare Plan
regarding Starnes Road.
Mr. Tucker said the City Council felt
Starnes Road should be a C-2-U west of
Davis Boulevard and an M-4-U east of
Davis.
Chairman Bowen called for anyone
wishing to speak regarding this matter
to please come forward.
No one wished to speak.
f . - r
Page 9
P & Z Minutes
August 8, 1985
(
.,--,
PZ 85-40
APPROVED
13. PZ 85-56
PZ 85-56
APPROVED
ADJOURNMENT
--
ecretary Planning & Zoning Commission
-
(
Mr. Tucker made the motion to redesign
the Thoroughfare Plan showing Starnes
Road to be C-2-U west of Davis
Boulevard and M-4-U east of Davis
Boulevard. This motion was seconded
by Mr. Wood and the motion carried
5-0.
Consideration
Plan.
Mr. Tucker made the mot
the Comprehensive Ma er Plan and to
send it to the C Council for review
and approval. his motion was
seconded b s. Nash and the motion
carrie -0.
The meeting adjourned at 8:20 P. M.
Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission
(
(
'-
7. Becky Lewis presented the Mayor with a $500
B. Dalton for t
8. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna,
to return the Thoroughfare Plan back to the Planning &
Zoning with all the recommendations approved except for
Starnes Road and Mayor Pro Tem Davis to meet with the
Planning & Zoning Commission and convey the Council's
thinking in regards to Starnes Road.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated that Starnes Road west of
Davis Blvd. was developed and would be treated like
Susan Lee and Vance Road where no additional right of way
could be acquired.
Motion carried 6-0.
Mr. Patrick Bradberry, 7320 Spurgeon Ct., appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Bradberry asked if he understood the Council had
approved the Plan.
Mayor Echols stated it was approved to return it to the
Planning & Zoning for further study.
--
Mr. Bradberry asked if the Planning & Zoning had the
option to make changes.
Mayor Echols replied yes.
Mr. Billy Williams, 7437 North Richland Blvd., appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Williams stated that his understanding was that the
Council was sending the Plan back to Planning & Zoning
and had basically accepted the Plan with the exception
of Starnes Road. Mr. Williams asked if there had been
any changes since the June 10th Council meeting with the
exception of Starnes Road.
Mayor Echols stated there were several planned changes
and the best way for Mr. Williams to find out precisely
what was on the Plan was to work with the Director of
Planning and Development.
Mr. Williams stated he had talked with the Planning &
Zoning Commission and was advised they only recommended
and the City Council had final approval. Mr. Williams
stated his concern was Holiday Lane. Mr. Williams
stated that if the street was widened there could be no
--
July 22, 1985
Page 2
PRESENTATION OF B.
DALTON GRANT CHECK TO
LIBRARY
PZ 85-40
CONSIDERATION OF
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
....J..... ...
(
(
-.
on street parking and an increase of danger to
residents, teachers and students at the school on
Holiday Lane. Mr. Williams stated it would also
decrease their property value.
Mayor Echols stated the Council had taken note of all of
the suggestions in the area.
Mr. Williams stated that if the residents could be
assured that only "x" number of feet for right-of-way
would be taken and there would be on street parking,
they would be satisfied.
Mayor Echols stated that no one said there would be
parking on the street anymore than there was parking on
Bedford-Euless Road. Mayor Echols stated that he did
not think parking should be allowed if it was not safe.
Ms. Lee Miller, 5124 Holiday Lane, appeared before the
Council.
-
Ms. Miller stated her concern was the widening of
Holiday Lane north of IH 820. Ms. Miller stated it was
encouraging to hear that consideration would be given to
taking the right-of-way from school property. Ms.
Miller stated that she had asked the Planning & Zoning
Commission if it would be their recommendation to take
the right of way from the school property and was
advised they did not make recommendations along these
lines; they only suggested widening it to four lanes and
someone else would determine how to do it. Ms. Miller
stated she knew that nothing could be set in concrete at
this meeting tonight, but she would like to have
something to look forward to; that they were not going
to put the street right next to her home.
- '-
Ms. Linda Morgan, 7533 North Richland Blvd., appeared
before the Council.
Ms. Morgan stated her main concern on widening the
street was the speed limit. Ms. Morgan stated that at
the present time you could not drive 30 m.p.h. without
endangering your life because someone behind you wanted
to go faster. Ms. Morgan asked if anyone had thought
about making the street around the school one way.
Mayor Echols stated the whole picture was being looked
at to try and improve safety.
-
July 22, 1985
Page 3
;. ..
Page 6
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1985
(
~.
-~
PZ 85-58
APPROVED
8. PS 8
.>./
PS 85-47
APPROVED
9. PZ 85-40
-
(
Mr. Byrd
Mr. Byrd said the lighting would shin
on the cars, not the neighborhood.
Mr. Schwinger asked if
would be brighter than
Chairman Bowen sa the City Ordinance
requires the Ii ting be kept within
their boundar .
owen called for those
wishin to speak in opposition.to this
st to please come forward.
here being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PZ 85-58 and lift the restrictions of
lights and business hours. This
motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Wood
voting against.
Consideration of changing the name of
the street, Linma Lane, to Daytona
Drive.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-47. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
Consideration of proposed Thoroughfare
Plan.
Chairman Bowen said the City Council
has requested the Commission review
the following areas:
1. Susan Lee Lane-Change from C4U to
C2U.
2. Vance Road-Change from C4U to C2U.
3. Holiday Lane-Question: Is M4U
appropriate in areas where
development restricts R.O.W. and
ability to widen paving to 48 ft.
Page 7
p & Z Minutes
June 27, 1985
--
- --
-
(
(
4. Starnes Road-Question: Should it
be reduced to C2U between Rufe
Snow & Davis Blvd. since so much
of the area is already developed.
East of Davis is not developed and
C4U can be accomplished.
5. Crane Road-Show realignment at
Martin Road & eliminate route
through Roseberry & Bonham
property.
6. Every street on map should be
specifically labeled.
7. Include in the document and/or on
the map a statement: "if physical
development restraints occur, the
City Council's intent is not to
displace homeowners."
Walter Couch, 6064 Holiday Lane, came
forward. He said if they widen
Holiday Lane to 48 feet, it will cut
into his property line and will
devalue his property. He also stated
the city has not looked at all
alternatives and he is against this.
Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Couch if he
was asking that Holiday Lane be
realigned.
Mr. Couch said he was. He requested
it be realigned to go on the west side
of the drainage channel.
Mr. Tucker stated they could change
the alignment.
Alan Levie, 6060 Holiday Lane, came
forward. He said he was a neighbor to
Mr. Couch and they live on "suicide
lane". He said he has 4 teenagers and
7 autos. Mr. Levie said they can not
park at the curb because they have had
accidents. He said all his cars are
running and inspected. Mr. Levie said
there was a drainage problem at Bogart
and Holiday Lane. He said there are
also lots of children in the area.
P.age 8
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1985
","--
- ''-.-
-
(
(
Mr. Levie said coming out of the
intersections, one can not see around
the brick barriers (or fences). He
also felt the widening of Holiday Lane
would devalue his property.
Pat Bradberry, 7320 Spurgeon Court,
came forward. He stated he had bought
his new house 4 months ago. He
requested the Commission look at the
change in the street that Mr. Couch
recommended.
Bill Williams, 7437 North Richland
Blvd., came forward. He said he lives
on the corner of Holiday Lane and
North Richland Blvd. Mr. Williams
said the City Council stated that
North Richland Blvd., Lola, and Susan
Lee Lane would be C2U.
Mr. Royston stated they would be C2U.
Mr. Williams stated if they take 4
feet off his property, his pickup
would stick out into the street. He
requested they consider the
realignment that was submitted along
the west side of the creek.
Mr. Williams stated traffic would be
worse if the street were widen. He
said M4U allows a speed limit of 45
miles per hour, now it is 30 MPH.
Mr. Williams stated it would devalue
his property to widen the street.
Dan Anderson, 7201 Lola, came forward.
He said there has to be something done
with the traffic, but at the corner of
Lola and Holiday Lane, there will be
no off-street parking on either
street and if they widen the street,
his car would be out in the street.
Mr. Anderson said he felt they were
going to compound traffic by adding
more. He said the city should buy up
the houses in the southern portion of
Holiday Lane and put in a park.
Pàge 9
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1985
'--
--
'-'
(
(
Mr. Anderson said he would not be able
to get fair market value for his
property.
Lee Bonham, 8920 Martin Drive, came
forward. He stated that if Crane Road
goes through as planned, he would get
run over in his bedroom.
Mr. Tucker showed Mr. Bonham and Mr.
Roseberry the change made in Crane
Road. They were pleased.
Tony Whitworth, Susan Lee Lane, asked
what C2U was.
Mr. Royston said it was a local
collector street and there are no
specific plans for widening Susan Lee.
R. P. Vinal, 6816 Meadow Road, came
forward. He said he heard that Meadow
Road was soon to be Holiday Lane. He
said he had lived here since 1968 and
this is the first he had heard if it.
Mr. Vinal said if you take a straight
shot from Starnes Road, it would be
worse than the Daytona Speedway. He
asked when this would happen.
Chairman Bowen stated this is a plan
for the future to get the traffic
through and the city does not have a
time table as to when it will be done.
Mr. Tucker said it probably would be a
bond issue.
Mr. Royston said the city is proposing
a bond package and asking for input
from the citizens regarding
$100,000,000 in needs.
Chairman Bowen said Holiday Lane would
be an M4U, 48 feet curb to curb. He
said it changes at Starnes Road to a
C2 and ends at Bursey Road.
Pàge 10
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1985
"'-
--
-.
(
(
Erick Hill, Precinct Line Road, came
forward. He asked what was new on
Precinct Line Road.
Chairman Bowen said the Thoroughfare
Plan shows for it to be a 6 lane
divided road.
Mr. Royston said it would be a
cooperative effort from the adjoining
cities for right-of-way. He said they
would like to interest the State in
building it from Grapevine Highway to
Shady Grove Road.
Mr. Hill stated the road was already
carrying 6 lanes of traffic now. He
said traffic is terrible and he is
looking forward to it being widened.
Gloria Anderson, 7201 Lola, came
forward. She said the school board
and citizens wanted the overpass at
Holiday Lane and 820, she did not
think it was the state. Mrs. Anderson
said 8 feet could be taken off the
school property.
Chairman Bowen said that would be
looked into.
Mrs. Anderson asked that they be given
time to sell their house.
Robert Morris, Starnes Road, came
forward. He asked what size Starnes
Road was.
Mr. Tucker said it would be an M4U.
Mr. Morris said he thought the City
Council talked of changing it.
Mr. Royston said the 4 lanes can be
squeezed in there without more
right-of-way. He said it is already
41 feet and would only need 7 feet
more.
Page 11
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1985
--
- --
PZ 85-40
APPROVED
"-,
(
(
Mr. Morris said there are already
several east-west streets and he is
against widening Starnes Road.
Marilyn Miller, 5124 Holiday Lane,
came forward. She asked why they
didn't take 8 feet off the school
property.
Mr. Tucker said the Planning and
Zoning Commission does not have that
authority. He said they recommend how
to take care of the traffic, but where
the money comes from is the City
Council's responsibility.
Ms. Miller asked how much right-of-way
is needed for a 48 foot street.
Mr. Royston said the goal is for a 70
foot right-of-way with 48 foot of
pavement.
Bob Grant, 6809 Meadow Road, came
forward. He asked to see the route
Holiday Lane would go. Mr. Grant said
Meadow Road would be good for
improvement, but would cost a lot of
money.
Dennis Horton, 6032 Holiday Lane, said
he wanted to voice his objection to
the widening of Holiday Lane. He said
Mr. Williams stated all his
objections. Mr. Horton said he has a
pretty bad incline and it is very
difficult to park in the street. He
said he would be in favor of running
Holiday Lane west of the drainage
channel.
Mr. Tucker made the motion to:
1. Agree.
2. Agree.
3. Yes, M4U is correct, but would
like to consider a realignment.
4. Starnes Road should remain C4U.
5. Crane Road-stop at Martin Drive
and realign & downgrade to C2U.
6. Agree.
7. It is always a City Council
policy.
Page 12
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1985
(
(
'--
This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash
and the motion carried 5-0.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 P. M.
Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission
Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission
--
-..
r
'[
f
',,---
-'
i
-
'.
(
(
Mayor Echols advised that Councilman Ra e that
Item #33 be removed e e would have to leave the
me ue to a prior engagement.
6A. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
send the Thoroughfare Plan, with amendments, back to the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that since many concerned citizens
had contacted the Council he felt it necessary to make the
following statements. The first matter that came to attention
was Susan Lee Lane which is shown as C4U had been changed
to C2U, collector type street. Vance Road was shown as a C4U
and is recommended to be a C2U. There would not be any houses
torn down on Holiday Lane to make it a four lane street.
There were some undeveloped portions of Holiday Lane that
needed to be widened, particularly south of Chapman in the new
Fox Hollow Addition, and between Chapman and the railroad
tract and as it goes further north into undeveloped areas
Holiday Lane may be widened to meet the criteria of M4U.
There was no way Holiday Lane could be widened around Richland
High School and along Holiday West Addition because homes were
there. Holiday Lane needed to be widened as much as possible,
however the City was not in the habit of tearing down houses
to put new streets in. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that
Starnes Road was another concern of the citizens. There were
some developed areas on Starnes that were not going to change,
but there were also some undeveloped areas on Starnes Road
east of the Stoneybrook Addition, where the street could be
widened. There was no way Starnes Road could be widened where
it was already developed and it should stay an C2U.
Mr. Richard Boykin, 7605 North Richland Boulevard, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Boykin stated that he had been informed that North
Richland Boulevard would be widened.
Mayor Echols stated North Richland Boulevard was not on the
plan to be widened.
Mr. Dan Anderson, 7201 Lola, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Anderson asked what was meant by Holiday Lane being
widened as permitted to M4U and if so how is it going to
affect the traffic where it is not a M4U? Mr. Anderson stated
it would be a bigger mess around the high school than it was
presently.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he felt all would agree that
if Holiday Lane from Loop 820 to Lewis Lane was wider it would
be beneficial but the easiest route is to take the additional
right-of-way from the high school property. Mayor Pro Tem
June 10, 1985
Page 2
PZ 85-40 REVISED
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
(
(
r
Davis stated that he was not sure of the answers, and the
Council was going to send it back to Planning and Zoning for
further study. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it was not in the
plans right now to widen Holiday Lane.
r
Mr. Anderson stated if was not in the plan why was it shown as
a M4U street.
Hayor Echols stated the City hired a consultant to help with
the Thoroughfare Plan and the shortages of north-south
thoroughfares had been identified. Mayor Echols stated that
Holiday Lane was the only possibility for creating a north-
south thoroughfare, which was probably less than desirable
because of the way it had to curve around to reach the north.
r
Councilwoman Moody stated she did not know where all the
citizens were when the Thoroughfare Plan was advertised in the
newspaper. Councilwoman Moody stated this Thoroughfare Plan
was a road map for the City to go in the right direction
because it was only half developed. Councilwoman Moody stated
it did not mean the City was going to start tearing down
everyone's house. Councilwoman Moody stated she felt the
citizens needed reassurance that the Thoroughfare Plan was
something to give the City direction and safe growth for the
future.
''"--
Councilwoman Hinkle stated that this was simply a plan for the
future and certainly the City had neither the money to start
widening streets or buying peoples homes. Councilwoman Hinkle
stated that without a plan you have no direction and she saw
this as a plan for the future.
Mr. Lee Miller, 5124 Holiday Lane, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Miller stated he had a concern on the widening of Holiday
Lane but had also heard the property was all going to be zoned
light commercial.
Mayor Echols stated he knew of no plans to make the property
commercial, maybe somewhere where it was not developed.
Mr. Miller asked if Holiday Lane was widened how much
right-of-way would the City take?
Mayor Echols stated the requirement was 68 feet of right-
of-way with 48 feet of pavement.
-I
Mr. Miller stated the street was 40 feet at the present time.
Mayor Echols stated the street would remain 40 feet except in
the'area of Fox Hollow Addition.
-
June 10, 1985
Page 3
(
(
r
Mr. Miller asked if the 40 foot street in his area would stay
the same.
r
Mayor Echols stated that this Council had no intention of
widening it in that area.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he did not feel the Council
could state that it would never happen. Mayor Pro Tem Davis
stated it was possible that in 10 years or so if a traffic
count indicated that Holiday Lane needed to be widened, it
might happen; but there were not any plans in the near future
to do so.
Mr. Miller asked if the street had to be widened would the
right-of-way come off one side or both.
Mr. Line stated a detailed engineering plan would have to be
made before that question could be answered. Mr. Line stated
the logical thing would be to take it from each side but then
it might be more practical to take it all from the school
property.
Mr. Miller asked if the Thoroughfare Plan came up again if
there was any way besides reading it in the newspaper that
the people on Holiday Lane could be notified.
f
Mr. Line stated the City would do the best they could to
notify everyone involved. However he could not promise
specifically that it could be done, because every action that
was taken at City Council Meetings affected the lives of the
people of the City to some degree. Mr. Line stated it could
not be anticipated who exactly would be affected, and in what
manner, and it would be hard to send a personal notice to
40,000 people.
- '-'-
Mr. Miller stated that if the citizens were going to lose
property he felt they should be notified.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that if right-of-way was needed
the person affected would be notified.
Mr. Billy Williams, 7437 North Richland Boulevard, appeared
before the Council.
-'
.
~
Mr. Williams stated that he had spent time talking to the
people in the area and was surprised at how very few knew
about the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Williams stated
that he felt some of the things that had been said tonight
was indecisive and that is why he was here. Mr. Williams
stated that he and his neighbors were here for one or two
reasons. One reason was due to very clearly indicated
changes in the Thoroughfare Plan and the other reason was
that some changes were indicated graphically but were not
properly annotated. Mr. Williams stated that additionally
--
June 10, 1985
Page 4
(
(
r
more than one of them had been told something different about the
street situation and they wanted to get a consensus from the
Council. Mr. Williams stated he had been assured by the City
Staff over the last three years that Holiday Lane would never
be widened and therefore was upset when he saw the Master
Plan. Mr. Williams stated that the City did need a plan for
orderly growth but not at the expense of the citizens that
had bought homes and settled here. Mr. Williams stated the
plan, as it stands-now, was incomplete. Mr. William stated
the plan addresses the streets and not the people or their
investments. Mr. Williams stated he was personally concerned
because Holiday Lane ~as on one side of his property and
North Richland Boulevard on the front. Mr. Williams stated
that some of the citizens were here because the graphic
charts show North Richland Boulevard as a collector street
but did not indicate if it was C2U or C4U and some had been
told varying opinions. Mr. Williams stated he and his
neighbors were against the widening of Holiday Lane and
North Richland Boulevard.
T
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Williams if he thought North
Richland Hills Boulevard should be shown as a C2U on the map.
I
Mr. Williams stated yes, he had attended the Planning and
Zoning Meeting and the people on Riviera got a consensus from
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
- .'-'
Councilwoman Moody stated she agreed that the people on
Holiday Lane had the same rights as they ones on Riviera.
Councilwoman Moody asked Mr. Williams if it would make his
happy if C2U was designated on both ends and M4U in the
middle and put the responsibility on the Council and Staff to
find another way to deal with the congestion and traffic.
Mr. Williams stated it would make all of us happy to show
Holiday Lane, all the way to Watauga Road, and North Richland
Boulevard as C2U.
Councilman Ramsey left the Council Meeting at this point.
Mr. Ray Yoakum, 6808 Starnes, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Yoakum stated he felt Starnes should not be widened where
it was already developed.
Mr. Jim Cato, 6729 Corona, appeared before the Council.
-I
Mr. Cato stated he had heard rumors that Redondo had been
added to the Thoroughfare Plan.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Redondo had not been added.
-,
June 10, 1985
Page 5
(
(
r
Mr. Cato asked what the City policy would be on the
implementation of the Thoroughfare Plan pertaining to new
development or new zoning.
"
Mr. Line stated that if it had to do with undeveloped
property, the Thoroughfare Plan would be a guide to the
Planning and Zoning Commission in terms of determining
right-of-way widths to be dedicated for street purposes and
construction standards to be adhered to by developers.
Mr. Robert Taylor, 4724 Mackey, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Taylor asked what the designation for Redondo was.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it was a residential street.
Mr. Jack Roseberry, 8912 Martin, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Roseberry expressed his appreciation to the Staff and
Council who had worked long hours on this plan for the City.
Mr. Roseberry stated he still had concerns on the route of
Crane Road.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
r
Mayor Pro Tem Davis amended the motion to send the
Thoroughfare Plan back to Planning and Zoning with the
following amendments: Susan Lee Lane designated as C2U;
Starnes Road west of Davis C2U and east of Davis M4U; Holiday
Lane north of Loop 820 M4U (consideration to be given to
physical restraints as it is not the City's intention to
displace people).
- --...
Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor Echols called a recess.
Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order, the same
Council and Staff present as recorded in the roll call
except Councilman Ramsey, who left the meeting.
7. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing
following information:
-'
This Zoning Application is presented the restaurant lot
located on the south side of Bed -Euless Road east of
Grapevine Highway. The req ed rezoning is from C-l
Commercial to C-l Comme al - Specific Use - Sale of
Alcoholic Beverages he applicants are completing the
renovation restaurant at this location known as
"Senor Ch' and they wish to sell alcoholic beverages
with service.
called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of
to please come forward.
June 10, 1985
Page 6
RECESS
PZ 85-39 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING REQUEST OF
SENOR CHICK'S OF
TARRANT COUNTY TO
REZONE LOT 3. KIP'S
BIG BOY ADDITION FROM
C-l (COMMERCIAL) TO
C-l - SPECIFIC USE -
SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (LOCATED AT
7762 BEDFORD-EULESS
ROAD)
-" ... ..
r
l
- {
- --~
- -
-""
(
(
29. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Ordinance No. 1231.
Motion carried 5-0.
Motion carried 5-0.
30. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve Ordinance No. 1232.
31. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved,
approve Ordinance No. 1233
b Councilwoman Hinkle, to
eletion of 9A.6B.
Motion carried 5-0.
32. Mayor Echols presente
This proposed Z~ni g Ordinance revision modifies the number
and size of park' g spaces required for disabled parking.
In reviewing tþ requirements of the Ordinance in relation
to the adopt State of Texas guidelines, the Staff discovered
the City's equirements were significantly more stringent both
in the nu er of spaces required and the size and location of
those s ces. The proposed revision would bring the City's
requi ments into conformance with the state guidelines.
cilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
approve Ordinance No. 1228.
Motion carried 5-0.
33. Moved to item #6A.
34. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
fon.¡ard,.
-----.-
June 10, 1985
Page 13
PZ 85-53 ORDIN E
NO. 1231 - AM DMEN1
TO ORDINANC NO. 10E
- ZONING INANCE T
ADD THE PLICATION
OF PL ED
DEVE PMENT CONTROLS
TO HE COMMERCIAL
D STRICTS
PROVED
PZ 85-54 ORDINANCE
NO. 1232 - AMENDMENT
TO ORDINANCE, NO. 108
- ZONING ORDINANCE T(
ADD SECTION 14.3.13
TO ALLOW THE ADDITIOl
OF AN APARTMENT TO
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
SELF-STORAGE OR
MINI-WAREHOUSE
PROJECT
APPROVED
PZ 85-55 ORDINANCE
NO. 1233 - AMENDMENT
TO ORDINANCE NO. 10SC
- ZONING ORDINANCE TC
ADD SECTION 9A - ZERC
LOT-LINE SINGLE
FAMILY DETACHED
HOUSES
PZ 85-57 ORDINANCE
NO. 1228 - AMENDMENT
TO ORDINANCE NO. 1080
- ZONING ORDINANCE TO
MODIFY THE NutffiER AND
SIZE OF PARKING
SPACES FOR THE
DISABLED
PZ 85-40 REVISED
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
POSTPONED
PUBLIC HEARING -
co~œREHENSIVE PLAN
r
r
f
t
-J
"""r..~.". ~
(
(
Mayor Echols stated the City had the write-up on the Master
Plan proposal which was the rationale for the Master Plan and
there was some essential elements to the Plan. Mayor Echols
stated this narrative was one of them, others were the Master
Drainage Plan, the Master Thoroughfare Plan and the Master
Land Use Plan. Mayor Echols stated the Master Drainage Plan
had already been approved. The Narrative Plan will be sent
back to Planning and Zoning for further consideration and
then submitted to the Council for approval.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher to
send the Comprehensive narrative back to the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Motion carried 5-0.
35. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve the request for an appeal hearing, to be heard July 8,
1985.
Motion carried 5-0.
*36.
*37.
June 10, 1985
Page 14
PS 85-25 PLANNING &
ZONING - REQUEST OF
R. W. WRIGHT FOR
SHORT FORM PLAT OF
LOT 5, BLOCK 7,
BRIARWOOD ESTATES,
2ND FILING (LOCATED
ON THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF HEWITT LANE
AND POST OAK DRIVE)
APPROVED
PS 85-26 PLANNING &
ZONING - REQUEST OF
JAMES W. BROCK FOR
REPLAT OF LOTS 7R &
15R, BLOCK 1,
PARKRIDGE ESTATES
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 1270
'-
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission
have received a tentative Master-Thoroughfare-Plan from its professional
Engineers and Planners; and
WHEREAS, such tentative plan has been the subject of public
hearings held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council;
and
WHEREAS, after receiving citizen imput at public hearings and
receiving additional professional guidance from professional Engineers the
Planning and Zoning Commission, after many months of study, has compiled a
Master-Thoroughfare-Plan which it has presented to the City Council with
its recommendation for adoption and approval; and
WHEREAS, all procedural and substantive requirements of law have
been met to effectively approve and adopt a Master-Thoroughfare-Plan for
the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
The following document, dated August 8, 1985, be and is hereby
approved and adopted as the Master-Thoroughfare-Plan for the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas.
PASSED AND APPROVED
DAY of
, 1985
--
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
City Attorney
~ ------ -.........
-.-J --.J ...-J --1 ~
L- L- L- L- L- L--
....
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
t~
~
L ~:o
. ?:~
C/);x>
L 0 .
. ~~
<D::S
L·· ~~
::s-
p3
Q)
" ::s
L ::s
pz. ps- t.jtJ
n
....
....
'C:
o
~
2:
o
Þ"C
....
::r-
::a
....
n
::r-
....
C»
='
Q.
:I:
....
....
....
(I)
----_......._~.~..._..._~,... ""'""'--."-
'--
o
t:J:
C..¡
I:%j
o
1-3
>-<
<:
I:%j
U}
1-3
::I:
o
I-3Q\:d;:d
::r (!) 0 0
CDOP:¡,.....
~So.~
..... ~ 0
§~p:¡::r:
:3.« I-:tj
nO>
tn;' \:d
œ~1:%j
aq' :::; ~
::s ...... t""
U}@>
,..,.,..,.Z
§ õ'
o.::s
~
c..
en
f-'
<.0
~~CJ1CJ1
-
Z
0--3
Z\:d~~~
~œ.§."1t:1
c.. ~«'8 c::
..... ...... en 0
Og>CD0--3
"1 en "1 >-<
o a: ¡g 0
0'0 Z
~,..,.
.....,0
::s,..,.
S::::r
B,CD
~\:d
-~
§ .....'
::sO
......::s
::s P:¡
oq-
I-:Ij
"1
P:¡
3
~
o
"1
...
þÞ. ~ ~ f-' f-'
o
o
Z
1-3
I:%j
Z
1-3
U}
...... >-3 ::E ..... ~ >-3 ....... Z ~ ....... =r: >-3 U)
0 ::r ::r to ;:)' ::r ::r 0 tTJ ::r ....., ::r >-3
>- Ci¡ .....' w ('!) 0 >- ('!) ....... ('!) d
>- t"" .......
Po? (") 00 ::r ....... ;n
::r ..... ('!) 0 ::r > 3 (J) tj
(") '0 - Po? ....... c:: >-3 Po? ....... >-<:
0 0 (") tj :;: ('!) aq ......., >-3 r-
:;: ....... 0 Q. 3 ::r ~ ....... 0 Õ.
Po? 0 ::r >
....... ('!) c:: <: ........ .....' >- ('!) '<
5' :;: ....... Ci¡ =r: ('!) Po? (") Z >- ::u
....... Q. ...... :;: >- ::r U) ('!) Po? tTJ
c: ...... ....... ....... ('!) ....... >-
a.3. >-
0 Po? CT tJ: ...... (J) Po? =r: ('!) ('!) >
....... (J) :;: .......
c: ('!) 0 :;: ....... 0 Po? Po?
0 ('!) 'i::
!f1 >- (") c:: Po? ...... ....... Q. :;: .......
0 0 ....... >- ::E >-3 Po? ....., .....'
:;: Po? 3 ('!) ('!) ....... ....... 0 :;:
0 Q. <: ::r 0 =r: 0 :;: (")
:;: ::E ('!) Po? U) ('!) >- ...... ('!) (J) .......
~ ....... >-3 :;: ::r c:
I >- ....... .......
...... Po? Po? Q. Po? ('!) (J) =r: :S. ...... Q.
>- '< -- ....... :>< 0 >- '0 ('t)
('t) <: ('!) ........ tTJ 0 (J)
('!) (jj' ('t) (jj' ....... ....... :;: 0
::E >- > ::s ....... ::r ::r ~ ........ Po?
'< .....' 0 (J) .......
Po? Po? :;: :;: ('!) >- tTJ ...... .......
(It¡ .......
'< Q. 0 (It¡ >- 0 0 (J) ::r .......
(") ('!) ....... ::r ('t) c:: ....... Po?
>- 0 ::E (J) ('!)
(J) ::r >- 0.3, aq 0 ::r :;:
0 0 ('t)
::;' ('t) Po? ::r Z 0 Q.
Po? '0 Po? >- '< 0.3, 0 ........ () (J)
Q. ('t) :;: Po? > ::E ......
::E >- CT 3 0 :;: ....... (")
Po? ....... 00 :;: >- t'" '<
Po? :j': ('t) Po? to,:) Po? ('!) ...... c:
'< ......., 0 ....... I-tj :;: >-
<: ...... 0 ~ ::u 0 >-
Po? ('t) c: >- :;: :;: I-tj ........ ('t)
(") ....... U) ('t) ('!) > :;:
>- ('t) c: ('t) ....... ....... ....... aq Z .......
0 >- ....... PJ ::E ::E ;s: c: ......
...... 0 '<
(J) ...... ('!) ('!) ....... 0 tTJ >-
I\:) (J) 3 ('t) 0 ('t) >-
0 ........ >- >- :2 ....... ......
....... >- Po? ('t) ....... ~ ~ ..... ::r :;:
::r ....... (") :;: ....... 0 (")
('t) 0 ....., ....... aq' ....... 3 ~ ~ 0
..... ::r >-
:;: ........ ....., ::r Po? ;¡:: .....' '0
....... ::E c: (")
0 IQ '< ::E ....... (J) 0
>- ::r ....... ::r >-
Po? .....
....... (jj' .....' Q. Po? Po?
::r ....... (") '< .....' .......
('t) ....., ::r >- CT :;: ('!)
>- ('t) ....... to,:) ('!) ('!) Q. Q.
:;: (J) ::r (jj' m (")
10 ('t) ....... =r:
'0 ........ ...... (") CT
Po? (J) 0 '< 0 ...... '<
........ ::!" ......
>- () >- .....' 3 ......
....... Iz ..... (J) .......
0 ....... Po? :;: '0 ::r
0 0 '0 ........ ::E ('t)
...... >- z 5' ('t) ....... Po?
....... tTJ :S, c:: .......
>-3 ::r ('!) .....' ....... ()
Po? >-3 ....... :;: :;: CT 2:
::r ..... .......
>- ItTJ ('t) (") ('!) :;:
>- ('!) ('!) '<
PJ PJ >-
:;: (J) 0 (") =r: ....... ::E ....... 0
....... Po? 0 aq' ::r ::r ........
....... Q. .....' ('t)
H :;: ('!) .......
() ::r Z
Po? 0 (") ::E ::r
0 ('t) () ...... 0
>- >- >-
c: >- '0 PJ .....' ....... Po? >-
:;: PJ (") ....... '< ....... ::r .......
....... :;: 0 -- '< ('t) 3 ::r
'< ....... :;: (IJ Po? ('t)
....... 0 ~
:;: Po? :;: ........ aq ::E
() ('!) aq Q. 0 .....'
('!) (")
0 (") ('!) z :;: >- ::r
c: ....... I-tj 0 ~ .......
....., ('!)
:;: 0 CT >- >- Po?
....... :;: c: ;s: ....... Po? 0 :;:
'< ....... ::r ....... ...... Q.
r-
o
('")
»!!
-lei)
-c:
0:0
zm
~
»
-c
.....
1-36W
r-""
:> (?"\.
z '. \....
-t )'.1 '-......
o : "', '
p c;::-/ "~~..JJ
CA)
....
/'
I
...
C»
Co)
,"'f"'::::J'
r'~
. '/
. ,
f/
'.. ~
)',~
;..,
...... ::s ;J> UJ p:¡ p:¡ ;J> '0 en' en' 0.. :;" >-3 z
0
::s ('!) ::s ::T UJ ...... ...., ('!) ::T
('!) 0 '0 r+ 0 9: tTj
aq 0.. '< c:: 0 ...... :J ........ p:¡ r+ <: ('!) tT'j
I 0 ('!) CJ
UJ ...... ~, ::s 0 ('!) CJ ...... tj
...., 0.. P. ........ UJ CJ 0 p:¡ aq
p:¡ 0 r+ ...... c:: UJ '0 r+ ....,
.....' aq 0 '0
::s 0 ~ <: ('!) .....' ...., ('!) 0 ""lj
aq ........ :J ~, :J 0 3 0 3 UJ ~ 0
::s 0 ('!) ::s
('!) aq ~ 0" r+ 3 <: ('!) r+ r+ ~
r+ p:¡ :J p:¡ õ.: ::s ::T
...... :J ...., ...... ...... 0 :J
0 p:¡ ('!) ::s ('!) en' ...... 0.. ('!) r+ ('!) 0
0 ('!) <: 0.. '<
0.. p:¡ ....,
^ (!) (!) >-3 p:¡ :.:;, p:¡ 0
CJ ~...., 0.. r+ r+ r+ ::s r+
p:¡ '< ...... :J ...., (!) :J Z
0 r+ p:¡ 0.. r+ ('!)
r+ 3 3 0" ::s 0 5' 0.. (!) p:¡ >-3
0 (!) p:¡ UJ ...., r+ t=: 0 ......
r+ 0 '0
:J 3 0.. 3 :J c:: (!) - :J r+ ........ Z
(!) c:: ...... ::s .....' 0 aq 0.. ;J> p:¡ (!) '< c:
:::; 0 CJ c:: ::s r+
'0 ::s (") r+ ...... ::T '0 ::s r+ 0 :J tT'j
0 ....., (!) ...., 0.. ........ ...... 3 :J ........ (!) tj
r+ p:¡ p:¡ p:¡ ......
r+ '< r+ 0.. (!) ...., ::s p:¡ ::s 0
(!) UJ 0" (!) ::s ......, c¡q ...., r+ 0 '"d
::s p:¡ 0 '0 ('!) ('!) 0 0 :J r
r+ ::s >-3 0 '"d ...., p:¡ c:: ('!) r+
...... ::s ::s ...., '< ;J>
p:¡ V1 :J ...... ::s c¡q
0.. UJ ...., p:¡ 0 UJ ::T CJ Z
- (!) (!) 0..
r+ ('!) :.:;, ::s ::s r+ ........ 0 0
CJ ::s 0 r+ ('!) p:¡ 3 ........ z
0 0 ...., r+ (!) en' UJ '0 3 ...., ......
::s r+ p:¡ 0 ,...,. ('!) 3 z z
,...,. ~ p:¡
UJ :J ........ ,...,. ...., ::T '0 c:: 0 0
(!) (!) ::::! ::T (!) (!) ........ p:¡ ...... ::s ....,
.D 0" 0.. :-+> ('!) ::s
(!) CJ (!) CJ UJ 3 (!) ,...,.
c:: '"d 0 ,...,. ,...,. :J
(!) ...... 0.. (!) '0 3 0" ('!) ~ '<
::s CJ p:¡ (!) <: ('!) (!) ::s 0 ~
(") :J ::s 3 ('!) ...., 3 (!) ,...,. ...., p:¡ ......
(!) p:¡ ...., õ' (!) ::s p:¡ ^ ::s ()
.þ. UJ ::s UJ p:¡ r+ 0.. :J
aq :J ::s CJ 0.. ::s õ' ......
0 0 0.. :J .....' 0.. ,...,. UJ p:¡
........ (!) c:: UJ p:¡ CJ (!) p:¡ ::s >-3 c:: ::s
0.. - ::s p:¡ 0.. ^ :J 0" 0..
UJ ~ ...... (!)
c:: 0.. 0;3, ...... ::s (!) UJ
CJ 0 ...... '< ...., ::s ('!) (!) ::r:
...., ...., - ::s 0 CJ .D
:J (!) ...... aq ...., 3 ......
p:¡ 0" (!) c:: ......
p:¡ ,...,. ........ ....., ::s ,...,. '< UJ 0 (!) ......
...... ::s ::s UJ
...., :J UJ UJ ::s
CJ p:¡ (!) CJ ('!) 0.. p:¡ r+
CJ ...., ('!) ,...,. r+ .....'
:J ........ ,...,. (!) (!) c:: :J ...., ...... ::s
p:¡ ::::! 0.. 0 (!) '< p:¡ '<
::s p:¡ UJ '0 '0 0"
CJ ,...,. UJ 0.. ....., ,...,.
aq ,...,. ,...,. '0 0
(!) :J (!) 0 p:¡ '< 0 0 ...., ::T ,...,.
CJ (!) ....., ...., r+ 0 (!) :J
0 ::s ,...,. ('!) ....., ,...,. p:¡ '0
...., 0 :J 0.. ,...,. '< UJ J, S' '0
J. <: ,...,. UJ
(!) :J (!) UJ ~ c:: p:¡ :J 0
0.. ...., (!) p:¡ :J ...., r+ (!) '0
0 p:¡ CJ UJ 0 (!) (!) ...., c::
0 ,...,. (!) ......
...., - ........ c:: :J
UJ ...... c:: 3 ::s - ,...,. ::s p:¡
,...,. ('!) 0.. :J p:¡ ,...,. r+
crq 3 ,...,. CJ ......
CJ ...., c:: CJ ::s :J p:¡ ,...,. '0 0
...... ...., c:: (!) r+ ...... ::s
0 0 (!) 2, UJ 0 (!) 0 ....,
UJ ~ UJ r+ 0 ::s (!) p:¡
(!) ,...,. ,...,. p:¡ ....., ...., UJ
0.. :J ::s '< ...., 0" ::s 0.. UJ ::s
0 (!) CJ ........ c:: 0..
'< (!) 0
r+ ,...,. ...... ....,
~ ...., () c:: ...., ...., (!) CJ
0.. ;J> ,...,. 0 UJ -
...... (!) 0 '< UJ 0
(!) ::s õ' ,...,.
,...,. ::s CJ :J 3
:J 0.. CJ ~, ::s aq 0
0 UJ ...., p:¡ p:¡ 0.. ...., (!) ::s 3
c:: (!) c:: UJ 0
,...,. p:¡ p:¡ ,...,. UJ ('!) 0 ~ 0 ...... (!)
UJ ....., c:: ...., ........ ....., p:¡ ....,
::s (!) 0 ...., (!) ,...,. r+ ::s CJ
p:¡ 0.. ::s (!) 0.. p:¡ :J '< 0.. (!)
-
.-+ ...., :s ::I .-+ ...... t%j þj . . . >-3
::r .-+ ::r ('þ
..... 0 ::I ø:> 0 ::r
('þ 0- .-+ .-+ 0 (',) ('þ
..., ::r ..., 0- ;:Þ
('þ « 00 0 00 ::r >-3
0 ..., ~ ~ 00 d 0 >-3 ('þ >-3 :s ;:Þ ::r
:-" 00- ....' aq ...., :is
0 .-+ .-+ .-+ ..... ::r ...... ::r ::r 0
ø:> 0 ø:> ::r 00 ..., ;:Þ CD ('þ ...,
~ ..... ('þ ('þ .-+ CD 3 ..... ..... 0
0.. ::I 0- ø:> ...... CD t-<: ::r (',) ~
:s ...... >-3 ::r ~
~ ('þ ..., ..... .-+ ('þ CD CD ::I
ø:> CD (') ::r ::I 00 .-+ (',) aq
« ..... .-+ :s < 0 .-+ .-+ ::r .-+ ::r
0 ::I 0 ..... t"" ø:> ..., 00 ø:> ('þ õ' .....
~ '0 ..., CD .-+ ;:Þ ..., 0 ø:> 0- « ø:>
...... ::r ....' ...... ::I ...,
00 ø:> .-+ .-+ C/J 0 ~ 00 ëñ' CD
('þ ~ ~ ::r ..... aq 00 '0 ø:>
::I ::I C/J ~
..., 00 ('þ 00 ::r 0 ::r ('þ ...... '1:
::I 0 ......
00 ....' ('þ ..., ø:> t,j ..... (',) 3 ..., ......
::I .-+ ø:> ..... ..... (',) ø:>
'" ......
ø:> aq ..... ('þ (') ::r ..., ø:> ('þ 0 ...... ::I
::I ::I 00 (') 0 ('þ .-+ ::I ..., ø:>
0- 3 .-+ ..... ;:Þ ..., ('þ .-+ 3 00 (',)
'0 00 ø:> .-+ 0 0- 00 0
ø:> 0- « >-3 ~ '1: ....'
'0 ..., 0 ...... 0 ..... ::I
5' « ...... ...... aq :s
..., 3 ..... 0 ø:> ..... ....' 00
('þ 00 ø:> ::r ::I ..... (',) ....'
(',) ('þ 0- ::r 00 Z ..... .-+ ø:> 00
< ..... aq .-+
('þ "0 ('þ 3 00 ø:> 3 ::r .-+ 00
::I ...... (',) < ~ ..., ('þ .....
('þ ...... ('þ 3 ('þ ø:> .-+ 0 0 0
.-+ ('þ ::r ::I
00 ø:> ...... ::I 00 '0 3 .....
ø:> 00 0 .-+ ('þ ('þ
00 '0 00 :s ('þ 00 .-+
ø:> ..... 0 ....' :s < .-+ « ::r
0- ::I :::? ø:> .-+ 2: ø:> ..., CD
..., 0- ..... ::r ..., ..... 00
(',) ....' (',) .-+
CD ø:> ;:Þ (',) ..... (',) 0 CD .....
ø:> ø:> ::r ::I ::r 0
'" 0- .-+ ~ 0- 3 :::::
..... ..... ø:> .-+ 00
0- ..., 0 3 (',) ..., ::r 0- ('þ 0
0 ('þ ::I ...... ø:> ('þ (',) 00 ~
~ (',) ~ 0 ø:> (',) CD t::: ...... ~. ~
(J1 .-+ 00 00 .-+ ~ ø:> ::r 5'
::I ..... .-+ 00 ::I 00 .....
0 ..... ('þ ..., ('þ 00 (',) aq
0 ::I >-3 ..... ..., 0- ø:> ..... 00 ::r
3 ..... ..... ø:> :::? ('þ
..... ::r (',) 00 ::I .-+ .-+ ......
~ ('þ "0 ø:> .-+ ('þ (',) ø:> 0- CD
....'
.-+ 0 .-+ (',) ('þ 00 ø:> ::I 3
::r ..... ..... 0- ....'
('þ ...... (',) ..., 0 ::I .-+ .-+ .....
...... ...... .-+ ....' ø:> ..... ('þ
ø:> ø:> ::I 0- < ::r 0 ..., ('þ ::I
ø:> .....
.-+ 00 00 ::I ..., ('þ ::I 0- ..., .-+
0 ø:> 00 .-+ ::r 00 0 00 00 ('þ 00 ...J
.-+ .-+ ..... ..... ('þ ::I aq ::I
ø:> ..... ('þ 0- ('þ 0 :c
ëñ' ..... '0 00 :s .-+
...... (',) ..., ::I ..... ....'
.-+ ..... ø:> 0 ø:> ~ 0 ('þ 00 ::r ø:> 0
::r « .-+ 5' ..., "0 ..... ..., .-+ ..... .-+
0 ....' .-+ (',) 0 ø:> ..., (',) ('þ ~
.-+ 0 ::r .-+ CD ::r 00
..., ::I ::r ......
0 ::r ::I ..... « ('þ 0
('þ 00 .-+ CD ...... .-+ 00 00
~ 00 ::r 0 ~ '0 .-+ c:
aq « .-+ ~ ('þ (') (',) CD ...,
::r 0- 00 ::r '0 ....' ø:> 8, CD G')
..... CD .-+ ø:> 0 ~ .-+ .-+ CD
ø:> 3 CD .-+ ::I « ..... :::? .-+ :c
..., 3 ø:> . 0 00
CD ø:> 00 « ::I CD
::I 0 ~ 00 0- ."
00 0- 2: ..... ø:>
« 00 :s 3 .-+ ::I aq « :Þ
00 ::r CD (',) ëñ' 0- CD ~
.-+ '0 ('þ ::r ::I .-+
('þ ...... ::I 00 ..., ('þ ::r m
3 ø:> .-+ ø:> ~ ('þ ..., CD
(',) (',) ..., ::I 00 ...... ø:>
('þ ('þ ø:>
0 CD 0 0- .-+ ...... ..... "'tI
..., 0- 3 ('þ 0 õ' ~
. r-c
.-+ < 0- ::I
'0 ~ 0- 00 ('þ ::I ('þ (',) :Þ
ø:> ....' >-3 00 00 :!'.
'0 ::I ø:> ...,
..., ø:> ::r 2: ..... 2:
.-+ 0 CD ..., ...... ..... aq 0
00 ::I 0- CD ...... 00 '0 ::I ::I
..... .... (t) 0 0" $):I (t) ..... I-rj "0 (JJ 0" () $):I $):I $):I c: 2::
0 0 3 < $):I () $):I .... c: ..., .... c: ..... () (JJ
..., (t) ..... () () f.ñ' ::3 0 ..., .... $):I () 3 ..... (t) $):I
$):I "0 ..., A:> (t) ::r aq (t) (JJ 0 c: 0. ::3
< 0. ::r ::3 (JJ () ..., (t) 0. (JJ $):I ::3 '<
$):I ....... $):I () $):I .... $):I .... 5 3 .......
..., $):I () 'f1 0 õ' 0 0 () S'
õ' (JJ 0 (t) ..... :E 3 3 ..., .... (JJ
() f.ñ' ::3 ::3 ::3 () õ' ....
c: (t) (JJ 0" ;:0 :E (t) $):I 0 (t) ::3 $):I 0 ..., .... ...,
(JJ ::3 0 -, (t) 2: ..... ..... .... 0 .... 0. 0 ::3 ::r (t)
.... 0. 0 ..... ..... :E .... õ' A:> (t) (t)
::3 .... I c:
.... (t) :E $):I () $):I 0 0 ::3 .... .... :E ....
'< "0 .... ..., 0. ::r () ..... 3 ..., ::3 (t) (t) "0 (JJ
"0 ..., $):I (t) :E $):I (t) 2:
(t) 0 ::r 0" (t) () (JJ "0 ;>;'" () $):I ::r
"0 ..., $):I "0 (t) (JJ ..... .... () (JJ
(JJ 0 ..... ::3 (t) (t) 0 .... $):I
(t) (t) « ..., "0 -. 0" r:n ::r ::r
c: 0 ~ 3 (JJ c: (t) ..., <
0 ..., (JJ .... (t) (JJ
aq 3 3 (t) () (t)
..... .... C". () (t) $):I -, c: ....
..... '< ::r 0 0 0 0. A:> ::3 () ..., ::r 0. ..... (JJ ::r
3 ..... $):I -, (t) 0"
$):I .... < .... "0 .... .... ..... (t) .... c: (t)
() ..., (t) (t) 0. (t) õ' $):I ..., '< $):I 3 ::r $):I -,
..., (t) ..., ()
-, ;1> $):I -, (JJ -. .... .... .....
t=: 3 ..... ::3 ::3 õ' ..... .... $):I (t) ..... 0
..... 0. '< .....
.... ~ (t) ..... $):I () c: (t) ::3 ..., (t) 3
-. ..., >-3 (t) >-3 ::3 ..... -, 0. (t)
(t) ::3 -. ..... (JJ 3 ::3 (t)
(t) ..... () ::r .... ..., 9: "0 ::r '< () 0" aq
(JJ $):I (t) (t) ..... (t) < 0 "0 f.ñ' (t)
3 ::3 ..... (t) -, .... ....
-. .... $):I 0 aq (t) c: -. () ::r 3
(JJ -, () .... ..... ..., (JJ .... (JJ 0
< 0 ::3 (t) .... 0 ~ ..., $):I
~ $):I _. 3
(JJ (t) < 0. .... ..., ::r ..., I!:I 0 -, aq ......,
::r (t) .... « (t) ~ 0 3 aq (JJ 2. (t) A:> 0
0 () 3 (t) ~ "0 ::3 .... c: (t) ::3 (JJ ::3 ...,
aq .....
:E 0 (t) .... (JJ -. « ..... 0.
(t) 0 () A:> ..... ::3 (JJ (=;' ....
::3 3 () (JJ ..., '< (t) .... C". "0
::3 ::t ::r (t) ...,
"0 .... (t) ~ $):I ..., 0. .... ..... A:> (t) < $):I
S' (t) (JJ .... '0 "0 (t) (t) ..... ::3 ..., .....
$):I (JJ (JJ ..., -, A:> c: 3 ::3 .... 3 (t) ~
..., .... (t) 0 0. ..., A:> < ::3
I-rj f.ñ' 0 ..., :E (JJ 0. (t) ..., $):I ()
åCi' 0 $):I S' 0 c: ::3 ..., (t) ::3 (JJ
..... ::3 < ..... I!:I (t) ..... .... (JJ (t) c: ...,
c: ::3 0 .... (t) '<
m aq $):I (t) '< 0. .... 0 f.ñ' ::3 ..., 0
..., (t) ....
(t) 0 () (t) ..., ::3 :E .... ;" ..... c:
$):I õ' 3 (JJ -. 0. $):I
..... 0. '< (JJ "0 $):I ....
~ ..... ..... 0 -, () (t)
.... (JJ ..., c: (t) "0 (JJ ..., 0 ..... ::3 ..... (t) (JJ
..., .... 0 (JJ 0. ::r .... ;>;'" .... ..... () .....
$):I $):I (t) 3 (t) -. (t)
..., 3 () () 0"
..... (t) () .... (JJ 3 () "0 ::3 c: .... 0 '<
~ 0 f.ñ' .... ....
(t) ~ ..... 0 -, ..... 0 ::r ::3
() .... ..... .... (JJ () ~ ..., $):I .... $):I 8: <
(JJ ..., (t) 0 0 (JJ .... ..... ....
(t) (t) (t) -,
3 aq ::3 ::3 f:!J. A:> ..... .... .... ...,
:iE (t) ..., '< ~ -,
0 < .... ..... ::3 0 (JJ ....
0 ::r :iE ..., (t) .... $):I _. .... "0 .... 0 c:
< 0 $):I -, ..., -. () 0. I!:I ..., ::3 (t)
(t) (t) $):I ::3 $):I ..., ::3 (t) ,
(JJ '< 0. f.ñ' (t)
3 (t) (JJ (JJ (t) ..... (JJ .... .... 0. (t) 0
~ õ' ::r ..., < -, .... r:n
(t) 0 ..... $):I (t) c: (t) ::3 .....
"0 S' () c:
::3 ;:3, :iE ..... a: ::3 ..., "0 ..., aq f.ñ' () ....
.... (t) (t) .... .... ::r
3 2: ..., 3 $):I ..... .... ::r
0. (t) ::3 (t)
< $):I () 0 0 ..., (JJ 0 (t) ::+ ::r (JJ
(t) ::r A:> ::3 < $):I (JJ ..., ~ (JJ (t) 0 .... :iE
..., ..., 0. åCi' (t) ....
'< (t) (t) ..., f.ñ' ...,
(JJ :E () ..... (t) $):I
(t) "0 (t) 3 ::r ::3 =. c: $):I "0 (t) '<
(JJ ..... ..... $):I 0. (t) .... (JJ () ...,
c: $):I '< (JJ (t) '< 0. ::r ::3 $):I -. 0 ....
::3 () ::3 aq (JJ ....
"0 (JJ 0 $):I aq t=: "0
..., () (t) :iE .... $):I .... (t) .... (t) ::r
0 .... -. ..... '< .... (t)
::r $):I ::3 .... ..., (t)
"0 õ' $):I $):I .... () .... ..., ..... '<
(t) ..... ::r ::3 0 0. ::r $):I .... .... '< ::3
::3 3 < 0. 0 0.
..., (t) 3 (t) ..... 0 ::r
.... $):I $):I ~ (JJ I!:I
« f.ñ' 0 "0 "0 $):I "0 S. ....
(JJ (t) (JJ "0 (t) () 0 <
.... "0 ..., 0 ..., (t)
$):I $):I < 0 ..... ~ 0 ....
() () 0 (t) "0 ::3 $):I -. ..... ..... (t) $):I
.... (t) ::3 (JJ (t) "0
() () 0 ..... () (t) .... ..... (JJ (t) 0. 0. 0"
(t) < -, ..., ::3 ::3 -. 0 (JJ 0 (t)
(t) .... (t) ~ .... .... (t) ::3 :E (t) ..., "0 (t)
(JJ (JJ $):I !fl ..... A:>
(JJ (JJ ..... 0. () '< 0. aq (JJ ..., « (JJ .... ::3
......
(FJ
"0
(1)
(1)
0..
(FJ
0 0
...., ..,
I!' .....
..,
(j I!'
(j ....,
(1) ....,
(FJ (S.
(FJ
(j ~.
0 .....
=' :::r
.....
..,
0
......
I!'
='
0..
ëiï
='
o
..,
:3
I!'
.....
.....
'<
1
--3
:::r
(jj'
(j
.....
I!'
(FJ
(FJ
~,
~
c: .....
(FJ 0
(1) I!'
0.. 0..
'-'.
...., I!'
o (j
.., ([)
..... ='
o .....
='
aq
(1)
..,
(j
I!'
.....
~,
o
...... ='
I!' 0.
=' ([)
0.. <
..... 0
.., ...... .....
ii' ..... ~
ÞOO-I Ü;. ,-+
([) 0
=' (j .....
aq :::r I!'
..... I!' ......
:::r .., ([)
VJ ~ :3
I!' ..... "0
=' ~ :::r
0.. ~. ~
I!' ~ 00'
..... 0. .....
aq r;;;r 0
~ '< :;
(1) (FJ (1)
.., 0
e:. :3 :3
«' ([) ~
:::r ~ ([)
dëi' aq :3
:::r .., ([)
~ ~ ~
-I
:0
-C»
:0."
O:!]
-Co
m
:os:
-10
-«
»m
oS:
Om
mZ
en-l
en<
en
~-
11
-
Ci)
C
JJ
m
I\:)
r-
o
o
>
r-
o
o
r-
r-
m
o
-4
o
:IJ
~-t
0:0
<>
m.,..
~.,..
m-
zO
-t
>
:0
-4
m
:IJ
);
r-
.,..
:0
m
m
:e
>
-<
'-
üi' ..... >-3 ..... 0 >-3 p.:¡ :;t> ct> 3 p.:¡ en- ......, -
..., ..., ..., ::3 ~ ..., ..... 0 .....
p.:¡ ::r .....' ::r ..., 0 ct> t: ...,
aq ......, ct> "0 ct> ct> 0.. ..... "0 < p:¡ 0.. 3 en
ct> en ct> ..., ct>
::3 ~ 3 a'ëi' ..... ::=, ct> ct> '< ct> ...,
-- (') "0 "0 ..., en ::E <
ct> ...... ct> ::r ::=, p:¡ p:¡ en ::r :;t> p:¡ 0.. ct>
..., ::3 ..... ......, ...... ::E 2: ..., ...,
p:¡ (') 0 ..., ::3 ~ a'ëi' ..... ct> CiJ en
...... 0 ..., 0.. ...... 8, en p:¡ ::r ...... ct> p:¡
...... ::3 p:¡ (') ..... ct> ......
'< p:¡ '< ..., .
..... p:¡ ::3 '0 ..., ¡¡;. 5' ::r
...... ..., ..., '< ct> p:¡ < ct> ::3 < en ct>
0 0 ..... ..... 0 ct> ct> 0 ..... ..... .....
..... ...... ct>
::E :-' ct> "0 9: ..... ..... ..... ..... 3
..., ..., p:¡ t: en ::E t: ..... aq
ct> (') ...... 0 :S. ..., 3 3 :;t> ..., p:¡
..., p:¡ ..... p:¡ 0 "0 p:¡ ......
p:¡ ..... < 0.. ct> ct> ..., ..., ct> ..., ::3 ..... 0
p:¡ ::3 ...... ~ ct> en 0 ct>
0.. ct> ..., ;>:;" ...,
::3 {jj' ct> 0.. ...... :S. p:¡ 0..
0.. p:¡ p:¡ 9: 0 ..., (')
(') ::3 0.. ..... >-3 ......, 0.. ..... p:¡ ct>
..... ..., <
::r (') 0 ..... 0 (') ::r .....' S' ct> ::3 ::3
ct> 0 ..., ..., p:¡ p:¡ ct> 0.. ..... aq ::=, 0.. .....
3 3 p:¡ 0.. ct> ..., ct>
......, ..., p:¡ p:¡ p:¡ ...,
..... p:¡ ::E ..., 0.. en ..... aq
..., 3 ~ ...... ..., ......, 0 ct> en
...... ..... p:¡ ct> ..... ~ en
'0 0 ..... (') ct> S' 3 ..... ::3
'< '< en (') 0
..... 0.. (jj' ..., ..... ct> ..., ct> ......,
ct> p:¡ p:¡ ::r .....' 0 ct> ...,
..... p:¡ ..... ct> p:¡
::3 ..... "0 ::r a'ëi' ..... ::r 0.. p:¡
ct> ......, ..... ..... .....
aq 0 ..., ct> en ::E ..., ct> ..... (')
..... 0 ::r t: 0 aq en '< r-+
::r ...... t: "0 ct> 0 t: ct>
en 0 ..., "0 ..., 0" ..., "0 :S,
I ct> ::=, (') aq ct> ...,
..... en < ..., r-+
en t-.:) p:¡ ..., < p:¡ t: ::r ct> 0
::r CJ1 ..... ::3 r-+ en ct> '<
::3 '< (') 0 0" en :S.
0 ~ ct> ...... ..... ct> (') r-+ p:¡
..., 0 (') "0 t: aq p:¡ ::r 0 3 0.. ::3
r-+ 0 9: 0 p:¡ 3 0 ct> ......, ct>
ct> r-+ p:¡ 0..
0 ::3 ..... ..., ct> en
(X) ..., :S. ..... ct> ...... aq CJ p:¡ ......
r-+ r-+ ..., p:¡ en ct> 0 (') 0 (') ::r
::r ::=. 0.. 0 ..., en ;::+: (') ..., 0 ......
ct> ..... r-+ ::E ..., '< ct> aq
p:¡ "0 ..... ct> p:¡ .....' 3 ::3 ::r
::3 en 0.. ct> ...... ..., ct> en ::3 I
0.. ::=. r-+ ct> !fJ p:¡ en 0 ct> <
r-+ 0.. 0 p:¡ ::r ::3 < (') 0
::r ..., "0 r-+
~. ..... 0 0.. 0 ct> c: .....
ct> ..... ::=.
..... t: ::r 0 ..., 3 0 t:
"0 '< ::3 p:¡ ::3 ::3 r-+ '0 p:¡ ct> ::3 3
::=, 9: aq (') '< ..., 0..
en 0 ::3 en ct>
ct> ...... "0 ......
::3 >-3 :S, p:¡ "0 :S, p:¡ r-+
8, ..., p:¡ ct> (') en ..... r-+
::r 0.. !fJ 0.. 0 ...,
(') ..... ct> 0 p:¡
"0 ct> ct> r-+ ct>
p:¡ 0.. p:¡ ..., p:¡ 0" ::3 ......, p:¡ ......,
en "0 ...... ., ..... ..., ~
..... "0 p:¡
"0 ......, p:¡ r-+ p:¡ r-+ ct>
p:¡ ct> en (') "0 ..., (')
ct> p:¡ 8. ..... ct> (') p:¡ p:¡
..., ct> 8, ct> ..., ..., ......, en
r-+ r-+ ¡¡;. 0.. ct> 0 (')
ct> 0.. ~ '< ::3 en '0 ......, 0 0
::=. aq ..... 0 en .....' ...,
0 ..... ct> (') t:
0 r-+ p:¡ ::3 ::=,
p:¡ ......, '< ::r r-+ ..., r-+
~ ......, ~ ::3 r-+ 0 r-+ ::E ~, 0..
r-+ ::E w 0.. ::=, '::: ...... 0.. 0
::r r-+ ...,
::r 0 3 r-+ 2: ct>
ct> ....., I >-3 "0 ::r ~
(') .¡::.. 5' ..... ct> >-3 ::3 r-+
3 ::r CJ1 '< ct> ::r ::r
....., "8, 0 ::3 ....... ct> p:¡ ct> >-3
::3 ::E 0 ..., aq ..., '< ::3 ::r
(') ct> .....'
0 ....., 0 p:¡ p:¡ ..... 3 ct>
..., r-+ 0 ..., ::r ct> aq t:
..... ::E ...,
-- ::r ..... r-+ en ct> 3 ::3
p:¡ < '< ct> p:¡ ::3 0" ct>
..., "0 en p:¡ ct>
r-+ ..., ct> ..., ct> '< ct> 2. r-+
ct> 0 ::r p:¡ ¡¡;. ..., ..., 0.. ::E
..., "0 .....' ..... < p:¡ p:¡ N ¡¡;. 0
.....' (') ~, ct> ::3 ..... ct>
p:¡ ct> ..... ..... r-+ ...,
"'- ..... ..., ct> ~ 0.. 0.. '< 0.. ct> ;>:;"
'-
-
t"'" (') (') ;Þ ;Þ "'Ij (') () (')
......
0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ...... II' :::.
() ...... ...... ..... ..... (1) II' (fJ .....
II' ...... ...... (1) (1) (1) (fJ (fJ (1)
...... (1) (1) ~ "'1 :E (fJ _.
S' S' -. ~ :::,
() () II' ~
..... ..... ...... ...... '< () II'
0 0 () II'
"'1 "'1 ,-... II' ..... II'
:.>. -, :::I
~ 'i: 0 0..
~ 3: 5' ~ 0 :::I
S' :::I crq
S' II' 0 () (¡i' E.
......, "'1
0 0 '-" -6' (fJ 0..
"'1 "'1 II' ::T (1)
'-" '-" 0
...... :E :=:
:::I
:::I (1)
-, (fJ
:::I
UJ .....
>-3 >-3 0
~Z II' ~
(j') ,þ. ~ 0'
I .....
N N ,þ. ,þ. I :::I 0 tr:1 ...... ::T
,.... (1)
00 0 (1) tr:1 (1)
(fJ >-3 ,....
0..
(') (1)
t"'" (fJ
'i: 'i: ('):;:.. ;Þ ãq'
II' II' o () UJ :::I
Z Z Z "'1 "'1 K: :::I () UJ II'
:.>. ..... (1) .....
0 0 0 .....(1) ..... >-3 -,
-. (fJ "'Ij
II' II' "'1 (fJ :;:.. 0
...... ...... ~(fJ ..... :::I
- (') tJ:
0 ;Þ t"'" 0
>-3 tr:1 .....
..... (fJ
0 ,.... '0
UJ Z (1)
(1) ()
~ UJ '0 Q Q -,
Z Z Z 0 K: II' "'1 ~
(1) 3 (1) "'1 II' e ()
0 0 0 :E (fJ ~o.. .....
(1) _.(1) t:I .....
0 tr:1 II'
:::I t"'" ()
-,
..... :=:
Z .....
K: 3: tr:1 '<
UJ
(1) K: K: (1) .....
z z z (fJ '<
0 0 0 "- (1) (1) 0.. '0
Z (fJ (fJ S' (1)
0 :::I (fJ
:E
c:: e .....
:::I :::I 2:
0.. 0.. ,.... '" ~ ,.... :::I
(1) (1) I I I 0
~ ~ '" ~ ,.... + t"'" (1)
0 (1) >-3 II'
,.... '" ~ ~ 3: :::I ~ ()
"- "- 3: aq -. ::T
N ,þ. -, .... ....."0
...... ...... ...... ...... ::T (fJ
(1) (1) (1) .....
3: 3: (fJ (fJ (1) (fJ ~
_. _. (fJ (1)
...... ...... (1)
(1) (1) .....
-
.
JJ
I\)
c:
I
~
CD
(/)
c:
CD
::J
...
ji)'
..
r-
r
o
()
»
r
en
-i
:c
m
m
-i
I\)
ø;
::J
CD
(/)
..
c:
::J
Q.
<'
õ:
CD
Q.
L
G)
m
0
s:
m
-i
:IJ
-
",,0
.... ~oo
I\) ~-i
~:IJ
em "
~m -
G')
en-i e
';0 :c
m
zm ú)
000
»-
:OG)
oz
en
'-'00
--f
»
z
0
»
:IJ
0
00
. . .
003:
I\)~~
c:c:c:
I I I
3:3:3:
5' I» 5'
o õ' 0
-. -. -.
. .
3:"0
~O)
00
I I
~~
::J ::J
Q ()
> '6'
-. I»
... -
~ >
-, -.
~;
.. -.
~ ji)'
..
~ 0)
CD
(/) I»
.. ::J
OCD
-, (/)
< ..
C:o
~ ~:
Q.
CD
Q.
r
>
z
m
(/)
»
JJ
-f
m
JJ
-
»
ï
en
I
(")
o
ï
ï
m
(")
-f
o
JJ
en
e
z
c
-
<
-
c
m
c
:c
o
»
c
~
»
-<
en
c
-
<
-
c
m
c
:c
o
»
c
~
»
-<
en
:0
Ci)
r :t
> 7
Z 0
m ."
en I
:E
>
-<
00>
o 0 ;:¡
--CD
œœ-.
() () -,
......1»
o 0 ..-
:' ..-' ~
I\)~ø;
ø;-::J
::J I» CD
CD ::J en
CD ..
!J!Jc:
c:c:&.
::J ::J -,
!2: Q. :5.
< -, Q.
-, < CD
Q. -,
CD Q. Q.
Q.~
»
JJ
'-f
m
JJ
-
»
ï
en
:0
Ci)
3:: :J:
m -I
o I
o
> ."
Z I
:E
>
-<
:0
Ci)
:t
r -I
> I
Z 0
m ."
en I
:E
>
-<
r
>
Z
m
en
< :J:
1J r- 0
> > m JJ
JJ -t ~ - °en
^ 3: m -i N ëi)-i Z 0
m ~ 0 0 0 JJ C m
z -~ > ~Z -to - m . I 3: (JJ
e;) :fir- -> >-t >1J 1J (JJ 0 > OJ
"T1> "T1r- z1J me;) -(5 -. -z (j)
1J mz mo mo 0> oz JJ:O "T1:E "T1m 1m z
m m mr- =r- 0> :Š::Z m· m >:tI
mr- ~o m(j) 1J z
~ ~~ -im -im mo :J:(JJ ~:E m:E m-t m
:š:: -> -> -iC: -en Zm -1J -t- I
0 -- -0 en:tl m
:tI ,-,:tI "T1_ -i C
-i -t :0 me;) - m -t > :š::
-i :x: > » < m:x: m -i :x: "T1
Z > 0 :J: "T1 m
m Z ~-t Z
C 0 0 -t 0
m c: -t
m :tI
m
z .... .... ~Õ o1~ ~
0) 01 ~~ ....
0 Q) 1\)"", 001 I .... 1J
èJ, 010 ....
~.~ 00 0) I 0 I\) 0) 0)
.... 0
Z .... .... ~Q) ~~ ~
0 Q) 0) 01 1\).... ~o I ~(..) CD .... :š::
én ~CD 010 0) O1<r 0 I\) ~ ,þ. :tI
.... " 0
Z .... "CÞ ~~ 0 »
I 0) 01 ~.... ~ ~(..) 3:
0 én 1\)(0 ~o I "'" .... 0
~.... 010 0) 0101 0 I\) ~ ~ :E
" I c:
Z .... '01 ~I\) 0) »
0 I 0) 01 I\)~ 0101 I ~~ 0) .... 0 -<
én 1\)0) 00 to 00 to I\) ,þ. ,þ.
CD.... " I C -i
en .... 01 ~I\) -<
0 I 01 I\)~ 0) ~~ 0
3: 0) . 1\)0) 0101 I 0) .... 1J
m 01 CD.... o~ CÞ 09 0 I\) I\) I\) m
c:
-< .... 1\)01 Q)
m I I 01 I\),þ. I I (..)1\) 01 :0
en (n CD 0) .... 09 0 I I\) I\)
" 0 c
. . .
.,,~ ..or- 0
Om ..om :D
:DC -."
~-I ø
~> _I -I
!Z Z-I :D
-c m
z~ ~:D m
()- Cz -I
;;e ~ø
>-1 ~
r-:::t -I
0 e
>..... :D -I
zø > :::t
em Ci) +
m
~Ci) m
0:1
zm >
00 :D ."
m m
:D~ > m
>m -I
:D-I ~
-i! e ~
m() -I :::t
:D
-e :::t ()
>m
r-ø ..o :::t
OJ _ I\) m
Ci) <
z e m
ø m :D
ø
-I ø
> :D
Z m Ci)
e > :D
~~ !XI
r- m
....... m >
(A) me -I
I m
0 :D
OJ
-
»
z
0
m ."
en -
- Ci)
G> c
Z :JJ
m
en ~
-I
».
Z
0
»
:rJ
0
en
3: 3: 3: 3:
-. 5' Cb
::J ::J ::J "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0
0 0 0 0 "'" "'" "'" "'" ~
"'" "'" "'" "'" 5' -, :0 -
::J ::J ::J Z
> > > > (') (') (') (') m ~
"'" "'" "'" "'" '5' m m
- - - - '0 '0 '0 ~
CD CD CD CD IU IU IU IU :0
"'" "'" "'" "'" - - - - >< Cb
ii)' -,
IU IU IU m
- - - - 0
~
Z
Ci)
Cb
~
:0
r- 3: r- 3: m
m
0 0 :;' 0 0 5' Cb ~
(') 0 "'tJ (') 0 "'0 ~
IU 0 "'" IU 0 "'" -4
"'" "'" :0
...... 5' ...... - ::J -<
"'tJ CD > (') "'0 CD > (') m "'0
"'" (') "'" -, "'" (') "'" m
<' - - '0 - ... '0 ~ m
0 CD IU < 0 CD IU
IU "'" "'" - IU "'" "'" -<
- ii)' ...
CD CD IU
-
(,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 3:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z
3:
c:
co <0 <0 co co <0 co <0 3:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OJ
r-
m
z
~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I\) Ci)
(7) 0 en en 0) 0 en 0 0 ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :I:
. -
"T1
m
en en en en en en en en 0 m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -t
III -
J ~L
o
Cb
-4
:IJ
m
m
-4
><
T
>
OJ
+-
o
L
STREET Y
) ...J
0 Z
'1 ì ~ w J] a: ø
z t- -(j)
...J <C Z (j)z
. . :r: ...J 0
N N Wo
,.. ,.. CJ 0
I I ::J Z C_
,.. ,.. 0
,.. ,.. a: a: en LO zJ-
:r: ~ en
l- t- ===> W 0«
w a:
I 0 _c::
t- ~ ....W
u. II 0 ~
W <C - UC
...J U. w-
>- (j)(j)
z ...J <C c::Z
< <C ~
0 ~ wO
w w
~ c l > J-U
- Z 'lit
a: ...
c -
W
...J
~ W
z I z I Z
<C III <C 1 a:
- a: I
a: I ::J ...J w ~
0
t- 1 Z z t-
w ...J I
w t- z a: t-
z ~ > III
J: ...J I- J:
...J t- a:
~ > a: ::J C)
> III l- I wi 0
I- a: - a: t- a: 11.1 -
a: ::J en w . OJ a:
w 0 11. J: o a:
11.1 >- 01 ~ 10 11. en
01 I
J,. <C a:1 - 0 ~
J a: ..,.
~ ) ~/ -
w C
I <C
u. t- -_/ a:
0 . <C
" 10 ,..
, ,.. a: w
/ ._.J'" I ,
--_--/ I
0 t- O <C ~
,.. J: ,.. a.. a:
~ w <C
en -
- ...J
a:
,"·--..·,._.,..:-c-~·..........'.v,.-..
CLJ ¡:.. c: » c: Q)
c: 0 ¡:.. > ~ +-' ¡¡)
c¡j - =' CO CO E
...... '0 +-' Q) 0 .....
c: I ..c: ..c: '0 CLJ
rn CO +-' rn Q) ......
'.... ..c: .0
..c: » bD » rn E 0
Eo-< ..... ...... '0 E ¡:..
c: > ¡:.. Q) ¡:.. 0..
0 CO Q) E c¡j
..c: '.... CLJ +-' Q) '0 Q) »
bD +-' ..c: CO ¡:.. c: ..c: .....
..... Q)
:2 rn ¡:.. ..... c¡j ..... .....
c: Q) CO >: .....
c¡j ¡:.. 0.. Q) rn E CO
Q) CO rn
¡:.. Q) 0
¡:.. ..... rn ..c: ~ ¡:.. '0
CO rn rn .t:: 0 ..... c:
=' c: CO ~ ...... CO
rn ¡:.. ...... '0
Q) ...... 0
0.. =' ..... Q) c:
E ..... =' rn ..... > .~
..c: I 0 c: 0
;:¡ ..... +-' ..c: 0 '0 E .....
...... bD ..c: c: rn
0 ..... :;: Q)
c: bD ..... CO Q)
> Q) .¡: ~ C) ¡:.. bD
bD ...... Q) ..c: c:
.5 ¡:.. rn C) Q) 0
.5 Q) 0 ¡:.. c¡j .0 C)
¡:.. Q)
c: +-' Q) ..c: ..... Q) '0 '0
¡:.. Q) ..c: ..... c: ...... Q)
=' Q) ~ '.... '.... Q) =' '0
..... ..... ~ '0 0 '0
I c: ..... ..c: co
..... 0 rn 0 ~ rn
..c: '0
bD U") co Q) rn '0
...... Q) .; » '....
.¡: rn ..... bD 0
¡:.. =' ¡:.. Q)
..... co ..... co .5 >
=' CLJ
Q) Q) c: rn ..... c: co I()
0 0 rn
¡:.. .0 c: .0 Q) Q) 0.. ....
Q) co '.... 0.. C) C'J 0.. ......
.c: » =' Q) ...... 0 Q)
~ » Q) co '0 c: I ..c:
...... rn E ...... »
...... =' Q) ...... co 0
rn c¡j I C) Q) .....
co =' Q) rn co E ~
Q) rn c: :2 ...... CLJ Q) rn
¡:.. =' 0.. 0 .0 c:
co co Eo-< C) > .~
...... rn '....
'0 '0 Q) '0 ¡:.. .....
.5 c: bD . c: .0 ...... Q C)
co c: ..... co =' CLJ
Q) ..... c: » 0 rn
Q) c: co E co ..c: ...... ¡:..
c: '0 ¡:.. C) Q) E rn 0 Q)
.....
co ~ =' c;:: '0 ¡:.. .....
...... ..... rn ..... .5
..... c: rn CLJ ..c: c:
c: ..... c: 0 Q) c: ..... 0
Q) ..... .~ bD »
¡:.. ..c: 0.. c: co C)
=' Q) bD rn c¡j ..... c: co
..... ..... =' ...... Q) rn ~
...... .r:: c: bD Q) ...... rn '0
..... ...... ..... c: c: ..c: ¡:.. Q) co
.c: I rn ~ ¡:.. Eo-< 0 C) 0
bD 0 =' C) =' ..... C)
.¡: c;:: ¡:..
...... '.... c: ..... .,¡< co
'0 ..... Q) I rn .....
Q) Q) co c¡j 0.. ...... c: Q) » 0
.0 ¡:.. ¡:.. ..... c¡j
..... CLJ Q) ¡:.. ¡:.. »
c¡j ..... '0 =' =' ~
'0 ...... .....
¡:.. ...... Q) ~ ..... .~ Q) :5
co ;:¡ bD C) CLJ ...... >
0.. ¡:.. co ..... ~
Q) 0 co =' c: =' ..... .¡: C)
ifJ ..c: ,..:¡ ¡:.. co Q Q) c: Q .S:
rn +-' ...... ...... .....
. . . .
.c - c: Q) » CfJ :... c: c: c: ..... Q) bD
,~ 0 Q) "0 ..... Q) 0 0 CO :... - .D c: E
:... Q) 'S: '.... ..... ..... :s =' 'S '5. ='
~ ..... c:
c: .D 0 :>, bD ..... .D ..... E
0 0 =' E ..... c: Q) I .c 0
Q) :... ..... ..... '.... E ..... :>, - :Š
ü CfJ 0.. :... 0 - - Co-o ,~ Q)
u CO 0 :... ..... :... Q) - >
.D ..... E
c: .c - 0.. 0.. <t: :... - c: Q) E
CO u - 0.. CO CO
<::: '.... CfJ Q) '0
E c: ~ 0 0 be Co-o :;::: =' CfJ :>, CO
Co-o CO CfJ 0 E 0 Q) CO :>,
:... CO - c:
0 :s Q) Q) CO ..... =' :... ~ - CfJ
:... :>, 'ëi) 0.. ~
Co-o E-o Q) c: .c :>, ,~ c: I <t:
c: CO ..... :... ..... Q)
E ..... ..... Q) c.....,
0 - ..... :... Ü CO c::
E CfJ CO c: E 0
u c:: ,~ vi u 0 I rñ
:... CO Q) c: 0 ..... .....
0 :... U CO c::
c: =' E Q) .c CO CfJ .c CO
'.... c....., u ..... CO bD .c
c....., ..... :... :;:: .c :s
'2 0 I <::: ..... ..... ,.... .....
Q) ..... Q) :... c: Co-o CO :...
~ 0.. Q) Co-o Q)
.D c....., CO ..... :... 0 :... '0
Q) Q) 0.. Q) Q) '0 Q) E
u - '0 0 :... CfJ Q) '0
"C c....., ..... Q) .c c: Q)
0 CO c: :... CfJ ..... c::
- - CfJ 0.. :s bD =' Q) '.... .c ,
=' - 0.. =' CO Q) :.a bD E Q) ..... .c
0 CO 0 .c =' bD E '.... .....
.c CfJ ..... ..... c: ..... ~ ~
=' .5 =' Q) c: ..... c: - E
CfJ .5 CfJ Q) :e -
c:: c: Q) c....., E 0 "C ~
CfJ CO Q) ..... CO U 0 Q) :... "C Q)
c: :E c: - CO E ,.... CO c: c:: u c:
c: ..... Q) .....
bD 0 ...... bD 0 CO .....
CO - "C c:: 0 :... U
'ëi) CfJ - U Q) CO ,~ 00 Q) Q) ..... =' .....
.....
CO > Q) :... CO CfJ ,~ :... Q)
><: c:: CO CO ..... :... ..... ..... Q)
'0 Q) :... :... 0 CO rñ .c CfJ u =' CfJ Co-o
- 0
c: E-o =' Q) ..... ..... '0 ..... - u ..... c:
CO - CO c: '.... - '.... 0 -
..... ..... CfJ ,~ ::t:: M
Q) I .c bD CfJ :... ,~ U .D ..... U '""' co
CfJ ..... 3: c: bD '0 <::: :... =' -
- .c c....., 'ëi) Q) Q) Q) "C =' .D Q) ,..
CO ..... Q) u - c: '.... c:
c: - 0 U '0 E CO CO U U .D Q)
bD ,5 rñ 0.. CO '.... - Q) CfJ Q)
CfJ a:s ..... .c 0.. CfJ Q) CfJ
'ëi) =' Q) 0.. .c c: =' c:: :>, .....
..... 0 u ..... Q) u CfJ :...
c: 0 ..... '0 ..... æ 0 CO a:s :.a
bD ~ Q) =' '8 <::: c: ~ ..... "C :... - ~
c: 0 c: c: c: Co-o CO 0 c:: Q) "C .....
CO Q) 0.. c::
,.... .c ..... :>, CO ..... .c CO E CO Q)
"C ~ ..... Q) :... :...
=' CfJ c: c: CfJ Q) ..... ..... =' =' 0 .D
~ ..... :... :...
- c: 0 CO ..... Q) c:: 0 0 c: ..... :... '0
CfJ ..... c: :...
U "C :... U E Q) c....., ..... Q) Z ..... I -
.5 =' 0 Q) CfJ '0 U ..... '0 ='
:... E-o .D "C ,.... CO .c '+-< Q)
CO CO 0 '.... CO U c....., c....., ..... Q) '0 0
"C I Q) U 0 '.... - .c
CfJ c: ..... ..... c: Q) u ~ 'S: CfJ
Q) c....., bD 0 u CfJ CO :>,
U CO Q) c: Q) :... CO Q) :>, ..... CfJ :s CfJ
:;:: bD ..... ='
'S: ..... ~ ..... u 0 Q) ..... Q) :>, 0 Q)
CJJ '0 c: CO Q) :... '0 .c Ü c....., CO c:
Q) CJJ ..... CO :... "C 0 ..... CO ~ =' "C a:s
"C "C =' > CO c: Q)
0 ..... c....., c: Q) CJJ -
c: 0 :... 0.. :... '0 .....
CO :... 0 Q) Q) a:s ..... .c Q) CO ..... CO c:
- - =' - CO c::
0 ~ 0.. 0.. CJJ .c CO .c ..... .c 0 c: :...
.5 ..... .c 0 ='
:... CfJ Ü E bD ,.... ..... » ..... :... U bD .....
..... ..... ..... c....., c....., :.a ..... 'ëi)
- c: c: E-o c: 0 0 c:: Q) .D :... '+-< I
0 U '0 :... Q) .....
0 Q) ~ 0 Q) ..; Q) 0 c.....,
:... U E c: ..... CO ..... 'S: Q) CfJ "C 0 '0
..... Ü c: Q) ..... Q) c:: '+-< Q)
c: Q) :E .~ CO Q) 0 :... CO Q) 0 'ëi) CJJ -
0.. '+-<
0 U :... E-o rñ ..... u :... Q) Q) U :... :§ c:: c:: '0 0 CJJ
Ü <::: '5 - > CfJ <::: bD '0 CJJ :s ..... 0 0 Q) ='
c....., Q) Q) 'S: :... I CJJ U U ..... :... 0
0" CJJ ..... Q) '+-< ,5 ..... CJJ
U CO c:: =' c: "C "C Q) Q) c: ='
Q) Q) 0 .c 0 u
<::: :... U CO 0" ,~ bD I Q) '0 "C Q) "Q 0 c:
..... :... :e Q) :... - '0 - '.... '.... .....
c....., 'S: CJJ 0.. '.... Q) Q) :>, =' CJJ CfJ ..... .....
CO - Q) Q) E .c > > 'S: 0 c: u c:
Q) Q) .c c:
:... - .c c....., 0 0 CO .c 0.. 0 Q) 0
E-o <t: ~ :E E-o Q) B <t:
..... 0 CfJ ..... CO - .c CfJ =' U CfJ U
'"' "0 ~
0 ¡:: '"'
...... ¡;¡ 0
~ U) ?=
...
'"' ¡:: Q)
0 0 ¡::
?= .....
...
... ¡;¡ ...
Q) u Q)
¡:: ;;:: Q)
'"'
Q) ëñ ...
'"' U) U)
¡;¡ ¡;¡
...... ...... "0 Q)
..c: u ¡::
bD ¡;¡ bD
::J ... ¡;¡
0 Q) 0..
'"' Q) Q) bD
0 '"' U)
..c: ... ::J .5
U)
... ?=
"0 "0
'"' ¡:: 0
Q) ......
0 "0 ¡;¡ ......
....., ...... 0
¡;¡ ¡:: ......
E Q) Q)
E Q)
'"' ..c:
Q) E ::J ...
...
..c: 0 ::J ¡::
... u ...... 0
U) Q) ¡::
'"' 0
... ?=
u U) ...
'õ.. ... 0
¡:: Q) ..c:
Q) Q) "0 U) .....
"0 U) '5 ,~ ..-
Q)
>. '"' bD 0..
...... a.
...... ¡;¡
¡;¡ ... ¡;¡ E
u -
:2 U) ¡::
a. vi ¡;¡ ¡;¡
¡;¡ ......
...... t:l..
'"' ...... "0
bD .....
:I:: Q) Q)
U) '"'
0.. ::J ¡;¡
¡;¡ "0 ......
E ¡:: Q) ..c:
¡;¡ .D bD
...... ::J
¡:: ..c: 0
¡;¡ U "0 '"'
..... ...... 0
...... ~ ::J
t:l.. ..c:
0 E-<
..c: ..c:
Q) ... U) Q)
'"' '"' ..c:
¡;¡ 0 "0 E-<
...... Z
..c: ¡::
bD ¡;¡ ~
::J ...... ¡::
z 0 0 U) Q)
~ '"' ... E
0 >. ¡::
~ ..c: ... Q) 0..
t:l.. E-< '.... E 0
ü ......
~ ¡:: Q)
:I:: Q) Q) ,2,0 >
..c: ..c: ...... Q)
E-< E-< ... ¡;¡ "0
-
TO SEE MAP FOR AGENDA
PLEASE CONTACT CITY
SECRETARY'S
OFFICE/MUNICIPAL RECORDS
--
tfJ 0
tfJ Q) 0) ....
"0 Q) t:: .... tfJ
t:: .D ~ ;:j .... tfJ
"0 .... ~ ~ Q) .... .... ....
0 0 :;: ~ t::
t/) t:: ...... .... ~ .... 6 ...... Q)
~ 0 "0
Lù ~ Q) ~ tfJ Q) Q) Q) 6
.c. :;: Q)
;> () t:: .... 0 J¡ :;: ;;- .c. 0) Q)
.... ,... Q) ,... t:: .... ..... t:: ()
- ~ ~ t:: .... ~ ,... ;:j
Q) .....
~ ~ Q) ..... ~ ,5 Q) "0
"0 ;;- t:: .c.
U .c. .... Q) .... t:: t::
.... :;: .... ~ 0 .... Q) .... ....
Lù .... bD ~ Q) ~ () Q) () tfJ
0 ...... .c. ~ .... t:: ~ tfJ tfJ
~ .c. ~ ~ ~
z ~ .... .... - ~ ~ ....
CC bD .... .... ..... C) c::
...... tfJ ;:j ...... t:: ~ .... '... ~ Q)
0 0 ~ 0 0 Q) .... 0 ~ Q) E
.D
.... "0 "0 Q) 0.. :;: ....
» "0 0 tfJ '... t:: .c. 6 :;: 0)
tfJ 0..
.... Q) .c. "0 Q) ~ .... .... ;;-
.... tfJ ..... Q) 0 ~ 0
ü .... ....
:;: Q) en .... Q) c ¡:..,
en t:: t:: .... "0 Q) tfJ 0-
Q) Q) ¡.. 0 t:: .... :;: ¡:.., E
.c. .D .... Q) t:: ~ ~ .
f/) ....
..... .c. ..... 0 Q) Q) 0) Q)
» "0 bD .... C) .... bD .... .c. - .c. t::
~ C ~ ...' bD .... .D .... 0
.D :;: .... ~ t:: ....
0 "0 t:: 0.. ..... '... .... tfJ '...
t:: .c. .... 0 6 .... ~ .5 0 ~ .... ....
0 ~ 0.. 0 () ...... Q) Q) ~
en » ~ ....
'... bD :;: 0.. C) bD ...... ';> !,.¡
..... » Q) C) f/) c:: Q)
~ '... c:: 0
Q) .... "0 '... c:: .Q ,9 ....
.... ...... 0 0-
.c. ~ "0 ~
Q) Q) ...... .... ..... .... tfJ
"0 E-< tfJ tfJ ~ 0 ~ ..... .c. c:: 0)
..... .... ~
.... ~ .... bD 0 .... ~ aj
tfJ C .Q .... = .!:: .... +-' .... .....
= Q) ..... ....
0 ¿ 6 Q) 0 ~ ;.::: 0 0 .....
, 0.. ..
C) ~ Q) c:: N ..... Q) .... 0. f/) to.
- 0 ,... Q) ~ f/)
Cl. ..... E :::t. c:: c:: tfJ .... 0
¡:.., .... '0 s: ;.::¡ Q) c ¡;;; .......
0 aj +-' aj
....... Q) ..... aj :ê 0 ,5 .... aj Q) en
en - 6 - .... .... 6 0)
.... :;: .... -
"0 aj 6 ~ ~ 6 .... Q) r...
() .......
Q) ....... » ...... .c. 0 u :> ~
.... .c. () .... c:: 0 .
tfJ .... r... r... .... r... .... 0 .c ...,
bD .... C) 0 ~ .... 0.. ..... '...
Q) ;::I - f/) .D ~ .-. '0
bD 0 0 "0 E .... Q) I:: ;::I ~ =
bD 0.. () :;: - ~ E
r... 'õ '¡: ::::: r... 0.. 0 0)
:;: 0 ;.;:: .Q 0 Q) r... 0..
tfJ .c. () = ....... ;;- 0.. ~ E 6 tfJ bD ><
E-< .- 0 a:I a:I Q)
0) ..... ~ c: ~
.- .... r... Q) Q) Q) Q)
r... () .... .... 0 .c: - '- tfJ ø 0
aj Q) :.õ Q) Q) ;;- "" -
00 Q) aj ..... .... E :p ;::I aj
~ .c: 0.. "" - "0 ;;- E :p .... ....
tfJ ..... Q) - 0 aj aj
> Q) tfJ 0.. aj = '.... E "" 0 aj "0 .... ;::I '5.
...... > bD 0 "" aj aj ..... () = = "" ..... a:I
E-< .- .S 0.. Q) .c: 0 Q) "" ~ 0 C/) C,)
..... 0 '0 ';> » .... ..... r... Q) a.
ü () ..... - = 0 ..... ;:j 0 .c ..... E ~
~ Q) = ( ) .... - f/) Q)
'J '.-0 > aj ü Q) aj = ø Q) c ~ .....
.D Q) Q) t\I ...... .9 '0 aj Ü aj
co Q) ""
0 E '0 = > ( ) '2 Q) 0 ...... Q) r... ,S
0 Q) 0 0 .c: ...... tfJ '0 Q) ..... Q)
bD bD aj 0.. .c: '0
- ,- "" ...... 0 tfJ Q) '~ .s::;
Q .S 0.. 0 ...... 0.. ';> b.o ..... Q) ""
E ..... aj ..... () '¡: c::: 0 ..... 0
~ E c::: CI:i CI:i
3: ...... ~ 0 Q) aj "" aj ;::I Q) 0
E-< 0 ...... = r... 0.. "" 0 0. 0. ()
00 Q) CI:i ...... ()
- ,S :!:: Q) "0 ~
~ - E 0 0 0 = ~ 0
0 en ...... ..... en .c:
0 ...... ü Q) E-< ;::I E-< .D 0 aj E-< aj en E-<
0 ~ -
Q) Q) 0..
::J ..c - E
::a ..c
00 E-< ..... . . . . .
. . . .
>-3 ~ >-3 ......, >-3 >-3
3 ¡::
0 ::r 0 .., 0 0
"C (1) aq' .....'
.., "C m (j
0 :::1 ::r .., 9: (j 0
< (j (1) 0 0
(1) 0 -- m (j 0 ...,
(1) r+
3 ¡:: (1) ...... .., 0-
.., < .., 0 0- S'
(1) ~ (1) < :::1 5'
-- ~
::::I aq I (1) ~
r+ (1) 0 ~ r-+
(1)
~ ....... ~ r-+
:::1 r+ I ::::I (1) m
::r m «
0- (1) (1) 0- m
"C .., r-+ r+
.., 0- < (1) ::r (1)
0 (1) .....' :::1 (1) 3
::;, < (j ::r
(1) (1) ~ (j
0- - ::::I 0
(1) 0 (j "C 0
"C (1) (1) :::1
r-+ 3 r-+
::r .., 5'
(1) r-+ ~
(1) :::1 ::r r+ =,
Cl r-+ (1) õ' r-+
::+ 0 ~ ::::I «
« ....... g m ~
~ ~ =: r-+
0
...... r-+ r-+ ....... ::r
r+ ::r «
::r --
I\) 0 0 0
...... ..., r+ (j
0 0- 0 ....... .., ~
(1) ¡:: ~ --
::::I aq r-+ :::1
r+ ::r ::r m ~
...... ....... 0 "C :::1
r-+ ~ .., 0 0-
« .., 0 ..,
~ (1) ¡:: r-+ ...,
aq ~ (1)
::::I ::::I ::r r-+ aq
0- (1) ....... ...... õ'
~ r-+ ~ 0
~ ..., ::::I ::::I
m (1) ~
(1) 0 m --
::::I .., ....... r+
m ;>:;' r-+ ~ ...,
(1) r-+ 0 (j ~
I ::r .....' :::1
0 ~ 3 ::-: m
r+ "C
....... r-+ .....'
I 0 (1) 0
"0 ~ < m ...,
-- .....' (1) r-+
~ -- ~
(j -- r-+ :::.
(1) "C ..., CT
.., ~ (1) 0
r-+ ::::I
0 ....... ~
3 ~ "C
0 (j (1) --
(1) ~
r-+ :::1 :::1
(1) < ~
0
~ -- ~
(1) ¡::
m 3 0-
r-+ .......
::r (1) ~
(1) m (j
:::, (1)
~ ::::I
(j r+ r+
-
-
")
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLANtJHILL$
PlanningandJ>'eVielop1llent 8 p. 6;{ 85
Department: Council Meeting Date:
Zoning Appl1<ts.d.on Shady Grove ltoad East of,.ns.vis PZ 85-42
Subject: ., Bêtt1e....""8ra<.tta_èlt &f Prccil'let LiMBeaa . Agenda Number:
Ordinance No. 1254
"',
L
L
í
I
L
This zoning application was oriltnal1y submitted as one of ej,lht rezoning requests
submitted by B.R. & L,Jo·!ntVèntures on properties generally locat~deast and west of .
Davis Boulevard in the area of:Shacly Grove Road andWl1son Lane.
This particular, tract is located 'on either side of the propôsed realignment of Shady
Grove Road east ,of Davis 'Boulevard and west of Precinct Line Roael. The requested
rezoning is from AG Agricultureanel C..;l Commercial to C-1 C0D8ercial. The tract
involved is 72.5 acres iJ,1 size. . ,
L
¡
L
The Staff noted t.o the Comm1ss1.onthat this request was a ..cond attempt to rezone this
tract to Commercial use. The earlier request had contained&3.S acres~ The earlier
case was denied by theComm1ssion.,
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that zontna ·çpU,cs.tion PZ85-42 be
denied. They cited the size àJ1d .'th. fact that several large tracts in the area had
already been approved for CommerclaIzoning.
The applicants areapp.âling that elenial by the Commission1to the City Council.
L
L
¡
¡
L
)
L
¡
L
L
I
L
L
I
L
L Finan.. R..lew
L Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) . SuffJcleot Funds Available
L ~~:g:~g:aw~ 1¿~Z~r
II' 'CITYCOUNCìL ACTION ITEM
I
---
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
,..,.',4~·
I,
"'¡ -,
".
II
p! 85-4'-
"GoT. R·2
);
!
,
I
, '
1
!
I
1/
~/
¡
.j
I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
~ I
, I
P£ 8S-4t¡ ~ . !
A4 i.¡;¡·~ . ~
[[[[[j
''"--
$1"11,0"
ç-O\l[
L,U
r
·U
_---l
- ',--
AG
'-
-----
------
'! 8>-44-
AG¡ 'Tø 0-1
J\¡tlll'T~.I€.L.I: 50._111.
I .
r' --
,-
~G_..
_.
---AG
-~
----¡:.~ ~
~ ...
.&"'íl.
fj
I
~
r,-I
(
(
"040 ~OO
~
,',
!.- .
I '.
c.. ,
. S,U.
i
\
'...........
lllIId
AG
R.,3
5
~GP!"~I[lU '''~If
C-2
AG
AG
... .----~-------þ_.._~------~._-_.-
···--··mm
~
.. ~~~¥:'1A.'.,.;~~--' ."';'~"'~'_ ,
-,--~~,--_-.ð«t.lj~., .bo/ iJC)__.
I I.·
-.;t-------~ ~.. -----.------;/-r~éJ -., --._.__.__¡t
_--LjC-:-L_______~___L4Z,.4A~ Z?,4
¡ I
., .--'r~---.'.- __u._ .,. -__,..___.__,. -" _.,__._._,__ ,.-,.' ____u____ ..____
i,
¡o-/ __,
_C¡(l. 2 I¿.u ____..l9. 8____
,.. -. _.~ .. -...
--.-..-.-. --._.
,....__.. __··.-____.·_40
_:.R2
_..-.~-_...._- .~ ---------.--------
/.30.2 k
2?,fJ__._.__
----_.~- '-..- .~.-
. '."0- _._.. .._..
___/8¢_
I
.:£3 _''''___ .k. _./tJ.'7 ___
i I
.. ¡~!.___.~ ... ._._.,.._._". _.__..._"",..__...__ __._..._~.__u_~~_ __.__..,,_ _..______ _~_..._____..._
: I
_ .:;".f?¢so_____,,55.tJ _//L_m_~,B.___
i 1
. ! I
_. .¡..t "--.-...- _....-~.."'-~..~...-._- -~.-...-_....----- .,-- ---'--'-~' ~'",.- ._..n___~____.___.__~_
.~e"..t4
, I
: i
: I
#7t/:3 Æ- ..__.,8,3.________-_
...---...-.-.. _._._-'-~~" ---.....-_.._-._- .---.------
'. /ö--;tè / ___ _
_ 5õ/24.3 ,___ IO?._., _____
v
-_.__.-----~-- ..-. .-_. .-------...--.
, -.---.'
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
c
(
"
·1
Mr. Wood said Mr. Grove's property
already backs up to commercial.
Mr. Grove asked if
could control what
Mr. Tucker sai
can go in t e are listed under C-1
in the Z ng Ordinance. He said C-l
is b cly retail.
hairman Bowen stated that Watauga
Road is planned as Conet Boulevard
which will be a divided 6-lane road
and Smithfield Road is planned,to be 4
lanes and he felt commercial was the
best use of the land.
Chairman Bowen closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PZ 85-41. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 5-0.
Chairman Bowen stated the following
eight (8) zoning requests are located
in the northern part of the city
generally east and west of Davis
Boulevard at its intersection with
Shady Grove Road. He said they would
have one Public Hearing, but each case
would be voted on individually.
4.
PZ 85-42
Tract 1
Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to
rezone Tracts lOA, lOB, 10A1, lOBI,
Thomas Peck Survey, Abstract 1210, and
part of Tract 5, Brentwood Estates,
from their present classifications of
AG (Agriculture) and C-1 (Commercial)
to C-1.
5.
PZ 85-43
Tract 3
Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to
rezone Tracts A2, B, C2, and 7A2,
Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract
1266, from their present
classification of AG (Agriculture to
C-l (Commercial).
"
'--
.'
-
-
!
Page 5
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
- 6.
PZ 85-44
7.
PZ 85-45
8.
PZ 85-46
-~
9.
PZ 85-47
10. PZ 85-48
11. PZ 85-49
'-
(
(
Tract 5
Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to
rezone Tract l5A2A & part of Tracts 9
& 9A, Stephen Richardson Survey,
Abstract 1266, from their present
classification of AG (Agriculture) to
0-1 (Office District).
Tract 6
Request of B. H. & . Joint Venture to
rezone part of Cherokee Estates from
its present classifications of PD
(Planned Development), C-1
(Commercial), & AG (Agriculture) to
0-1 (Office District).
Tract 8
Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to
rezone Tract 4 & part of Tracts 3 &
4A, Thomas Peck Survey, Abstract 1210,
and part of Tract 3A, Stephen
Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from
their present classification of AG
(Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family).
Tract 17
Request of ~. H. & L. Joint Venture to
rezone part of Tract 5, Brentwood
Estates, from its present
classification of AG (Agriculture) to
R-4-SD (Separate Ownership Duplex).
Tract 18
Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to
rezone Lots 12 thru 18, Holder
Smithfield Addition, from their
present classification of R-3 (Single
Family) to 0-1 (Office District).
Tract 19
Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to
rezone part of Tract 9A, Stephen
Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from
its present classification of AG
(Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family).
Chairman Bowen opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of these requests to
please corne forward.
Page 6
p & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
'-
(
(
Owen D. Long, Consulting Engineer and
part owner of the property, came
forward. He said on Tract 1, they
reduced the size and are asking again
for commercial zoning; Tract 3 is
another tract they are requesting
commercial on where Wilson Lane comes
through; Tract 5, they are requesting
office zoning which they feel will be
more appropriate; Tract 6, they are
requesting from C-1 to 0-1 to square
up the area.
Mr. Long said on Tract 8, they
previously requested R-3, but revised
it to R-2 and added 13 more acres to
it; Tract 17, they are requesting
R-4-SD to use as a buffer. He said .
they had previously just used the gas
line as a buffer; Tract 18, they
revised to office zoning after talking
to the adjacent property owners; and
Tract 19, they are requesting R-3.
Cliff Stevens, 9201 Kirk Lane, came
forward. He said he did not know if
he was for or against this request
until he found out what plans they
have for the drainage of this
property. He showed pictures of high
water in the area around bear creek.
Mr. Stevens said he and his sister own
40 acres and Bear Creek goes across
the corner of their land. He said
they have gone into Stonybrook and dug
a line and now Stonybrook drains down
there. Mr. Stevens said he had the
property since 1944 and had no problem
with the drainage until development
started. He said his main concern was
what they planned to do with the
water. He said he might have to get
him a houseboat.
Chairman Bowen stated the drainage
would have to be resolved during the
platting process and they would have
to satisfy the City Engineer and Mr.
Royston.
Mr. Stevens said nothing had been done
in the past.
Page 7
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
(
(
Mr. Tucker said the city now has a
Mas~er Drainage Plan and asked Mr.
Royston to explain what would be
required.
Mr. Royston said when they platted the
property, they would be required to
submit drainage plans for the site
which would have to meet the city's
requirements.
Mr. Royston stated the city now has a
Master Drainage Plan to go by and now
knows'what must be done. He said the
city spent $150,000 to obtain this.
Mr. Stevens stated he was not against
development, but did not want to be '
flooded out.
Carol Bentley, 8637 Timber Drive, came
forward. She said the side of her
property will be across the street
from this office zoning request. Ms.
Bentley said she appreciated the way
the Commission had worked with them in
putting the stipulation that the
property not be developed until Wilson
Lane is in and they request this same
stipulation on number 6.
Roger Martin, 8633 Timber Drive, came
forward. He said he would like to
speak in favor of Tract #18 and would
like to express his appreciation to
the applicants who changed their
request from commercial to office
zoning. He said he would like for
them to put a little further into the
C-l. Mr. Martin stated they are
without sewer and they would like to
work with them and the city to get the
sewer to their property.
John Barfield, part owner of the
property, came forward. He said they
are well aware of the water. He said
he had been trying to buy land all the
way to the creek. He said, in North
Richland Hills, if you own the top of
the hill, you need to also own the
bottom of the hill. Mr. Barfield said
Page 8
p & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
,~
'--
-
(
(
even though Mr. Stevens and Mr. Morrow
are not willing to sell, they said
they would work with us and we feel
the water problem will be solved.
Chairman Bowen called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to
these requests to please come forward.
Frank Yarbrough, 8144 Red Rose Trail,
came forward to speak in opposition to
a portion of Tract 6. He said when he
bought his property in 1975, he knew
some of the property there was zoned
commercial. He said he does not
object to commercial, but do not feel
that anymore would benefit the
neighborhood. Mr. Yarbrough said the
homes in Cherokee Estates are
approximately 2,000 square feet. He
said the property is already platted
and feel they should build homes
there. Mr. Yarbrough said he felt
this request would devaluate his
property.
Frank Balch, 8148 Red Rose Trail, came
forward. He said he had some
questions to ask: If most of the
people are for this request, would it
pass.
Chairman Bowen said the Commission has
to look at what is the best use of the
land.
Mr. Balch asked if most of the people
are against it, would it be denied.
Chairman Bowen said it would be the
same token.
Mr. Balch asked how much office zoning
do we need.
Chairman Bowen said the Commission has
just submitted a Master Plan to the
City Council and there will be a need
for office space.
Page 9
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
,"--,
''..
"~
(
(
Mr. Balch asked how many office spaces
are vacant in the city.
Chairman Bowen said he could not
answer that.
Mr. Balch presented pictures of vacant
office space in the city.
Mr. Tucker said they have to make
plans to construct the proper size of
,water and sewer to serve all this
area. He said they have to anticipate
the use for 10 years from now.
Mr. Balch said they did not send him a
correct plat. He said his home is on
Lot lOR. He said Mr. Barfield bought
property that was zoned and platted
for single family.
Mr. Wood said Mr. Balch's house would
be to the north of the proposed Wilson
Lane, the property in question is to
the south of Wilson Lane.
Mr. Tucker said the road will split it
up from the'other property in the
subdivision.
Mr. Balch asked if this request is
approved, would the Commission be
personally responsible for the
devaluation of their property. He
said he knows a lot of property in
the city where they have zoned
commercial near it and the people
could not sell it.
Mr. Balch said he is against cutting
any residential lots out of a
subdivision. He said they knew they
were zoned and platted for single
family when they bought them.
Nelson Miller, 8516 Shady Grove Road,
came forward to represent Richland
Hills Riding Club. He said he wants
to speak in opposition to #8. Mr.
Miller said they purchased this
property which is zoned C-l Commercial
. Specific Use for a riding club in
Page 10
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
(-
(
1975. He said they already have 30
events scheduled. He said they must
use lights for shows and practices.
Mr. Miller said they have 100
families, approximately 300 people in
the riding club which is also used for
the 4H Club and the County 4H Club
Horse shows.
Mr. Miller stated the property is
mostly used by youth. He said their
motto was to promote the youth. Mr.
Miller said they are 40 feet from
their property line which would be the
east side of this request. He said
they use the lights till 11:30 P. M.
and some time as late as 2:00 A. M. .
Mr. Miller said it was stated at the
City Council that there would be a
trade. He said he had not heard of a
trade and no one has made an offer.
He said they would want to stay here.
Mr. .Wood asked if they would be
agreeable to a trade.
Mr. Miller said he would have to see
it in writing. He said they do not
want flood land.
Mr. Long came forward. He said they
would be glad to work with them, but
are not sure where they would
relocate them.
Mr. Tucker said the Commission had to
look at it as it is now.
Mr. Miller said they feel their
commercial property would not be
compatible with this residential
zoning.
Mr. Tucker stated they were running
under a grandfather clause now. He
said the Zoning Ordinance has been
changed. He said if they asked for a
building permit, they would find they
have a problem.
Page 11
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
h__
(
(
Mr. Miller asked if the Commission
preferred the riding club be out of
this area.
Mr. Tucker said no, but he was just
telling them of the ordinance.
Mr. Miller said he did not feel that
residential would be compatible to
them and would rather have commercial
all around them.
CaroI'Bentley came forward. She said
she wanted to speak in opposition to
Tract 8 and she had a letter to read
from Susie Jo Beebe, Organizational
Leader for the Bronc Buster 4-H Club~
who was unable to come tonight: " I
regret that I was unable to attend
this meeting tonight because of a
district 4-H meeting. However,
because of the importance of this
issue, I have asked that this be read
to the council. I serve in a
volunteer capacity as the
Organizational Leader of the Bronc
Buster 4-H Club. This club is the
only r-H horse club in North Tarrant
County. Through this club we have
greatly increased the horsemanship
skills of numerous 4-H and non-4-H
members. Not only does 4-H teach
horsemanship skills, but also teaches
a child to be a responsible leader and
a service to his or her community.
Without the Richland Hills Riding Club
and its facility, the task of 4-H
would be much more difficult. The
arena serves as a place at which the
children can meet and practice
learning the training skills they have
learned. In addition, we use the
arena for our annual horse show, and
other countywide and even districtwide
horse activities. It is used by Texas
A & m University at least twice a year
for horsemanship clinics. I do
understand that if the riding club is
pushed aside or driven out in the name
of progress, that it could relocate.
Page 12
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
~
(
(
But the issue to us is the centrality
of the facility. As I mentioned, the
Bronc Buster 4-H Club is the only 4-H
horse club in North Tarrant County.
The others are in Arlington and
Crowley. Our membership is made up of
children from Keller, Colleyville,
Smithfield, Watauga, North Richland
Hills, Hurst, Haslet and even Euless.
Nowhere else is there as nice a
facility or a club as supportive of
our 4-H club as the Richland Hills
Riding Club. The 4-H club takes the
responsibility of keeping the grounds
clean and painted in appreciation for
the riding club's support. .
Additionally, the riding club is in
the process of trying to upgrade the
facility to accommodate the many new
members that are drawn to the club by
its convenience and present
facilities. The Bronc Buster 4-H Club
would like to go on record in asking
that the council consider allowing the
Riding Club to continue operating at
its present location. It serves too
many citizens of Richland Hills, as
well as surrounding communities to be
forced to move to a remote corner of
the county. Therefore, we would like
to ask for a buffer zone between the
R-2 houses that are proposed and the
RHRC. This would keep the RHRC from
becoming a nuisance."
Mr. Wood said the Commission is not
against the riding club.
Ms. Bentley said someone made the
statement at the last meeting that the
property was too valuable for a riding
club. She said you have your city
parks, but no livestock are allowed.
Ms. Bentley asked that there be a
buffer zone to keep the riding club
from being a problem to the
residences.
Mr. Wood said he felt it should stay
and no one wishes them to change.
Page 13
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
4.
PZ 85-42
DENIED
5.
PZ 85-43
APPROVED
6.
PZ 85-44
APPROVED
(-
(
Adriana Bellomy, 6912 Little Ranch
Road, came forward. She said she was
President of the Bronc Buster 4-H
Club. She said you learn a lot being
a member of this club. Ms. Bellomy
said she had been a member for 4
years. She said she hoped they would
always have a riding club and
requested a buffer between the
residential and the riding club.
Roger Martin came forward. He said he
wanted to ask one question about Tract
18. He asked if they planned to come
in later and ask for commercial zoning
on this tract.
Mr. Long said they would not.
Chairman Bowen closed the Public
Hearing.
Tract 1
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PZ 85-42. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood. The motion failed by a vote
of 2-3 with'Bowen, Nash, and Schwinger
voting against.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to deny
PZ 85-42 because of the excessive
amount of land. He said he felt they
should reduce the property north of
Shady Grove Road. This motion was
seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion to
deny carried 3-2 with Tucker and Wood
voting against denial.
Tract 3
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ
85-43. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 5-0.
Tract 5
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PZ 85-44. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
Page 14
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1985
r
f
'\
(
"""-
7. PZ 85-45
APPROVED
Tract 6
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ
85-45. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
8. PZ 85-46
APPROVED
Tract 8
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PZ 85-46 with a stipulation that they
work out a buffer with the riding
club. This motion was seconded by Ms.
Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
9. PZ 85-47
APPROVED
Tract 17
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PZ 85-47. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0."
10. PZ 85-48
APPROVED
Tract 18
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PZ 85-48. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion
carried 5-0.
11. PZ 85-49
APPROVED
Tract 19
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PZ 85-49. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0.
RECESS
Chairman Bowen called a
P. M.
BACK TO ORDER
The meeting was called back
by the Chairman at
same members prese
12. PZ 85-50
s Hombres Restaurant to
rezone rt of Lot 4R-2, Block 10,
Sn eights North Addition, from its
resent classification of C-2-Specific
Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages to
C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic
Beverages (Change of Ownership). This
property is located at 5344 Rufe Snow
Drive.
Chairman Bowen opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
(-
,}
(
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, I NC,
CONSUL TlNG ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
Apri 1 24., 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 85-42 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM 'AG & C-1' TO C-1
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 117,181
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
a¡tW-tI/. Ût/t-:-
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
",---
-.
Zoning Review
PZ 85-42
Page
1.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
þ ~'~ ...'
ORDINANCE NO. 1254
".......~
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION A1~ THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-42 the following described property shall
be rezoned from AG & C-l to C-l.
ALL that certain tract or parcel of land out of the Thomas Peck Survey,
Abstract 1210, Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes
and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a point at the intersection of the South right-of-way line of
Keller-Shady Grove Road (a public right-of-way of approximately 50.0 feet
in width) and the Easterly right-of-way line of Farm Market Road #1938,
Davis Boulevard (a public right-of-way of 120.0 feet in width);
- "--
THENCE North 31 degrees 32 minutes East with said Easterly right-of-way
line 942.0 feet to a point at the Northwest corner of an 11.03 acre tract
show as Exhibit A in Volume 4777, Page 837, Deed Records, Tarrant County,
Texas;
THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes East with the North boundary line of
said 11.0 acre tract, 467.4 feet to a point;
THENCE South 00 degrees 05 minutes West with the East boundary line of said
tract 801.4 feet to a point in the Southerly right-of-way line of said
Keller-Shady Grove Road;
..
THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes East with said right-of-way line, 402.2
feet to a point at the Northwest corner of the Shady Grove Baptist Church
tract;
THENCE South 00 degrees 14 minutes West with the West boundary line of said
Church tract, 417.6 feet to a point at the Southwest corner of said tract;
--
THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes East with the South boundary line of
said Church tract, 316.3 feet to a point;
THENCE South 02 degrees 43 minutes West, 866.8 feet to a point;
THENCE West, 1034.1 feet to a point;
J-' ..,.;"~
Page 2
THENCE North 60 degrees 00 minutes West 74.4 feet to a point;
."
THENCE South 79 degrees 47 minutes West being Northwesterly 300.0 feet at
right angle from and parallel to the center line of a 25.0 foot Continental
Pipeline Company easement, 1442.0 feet to a point in the Easterly
right-of-way line of said Farm Market Road #1938;
THENCE North 30 degrees 37 minutes East with said right-of-way line, 1734.0
feet to the place of beginning and containing 72.5 acres of land, more or
less;
This pröperty is located in the northern part of the city generally east of
Davis Boulevard at its intersection with Shady Grove Road.
.'
DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF MAY, 1985.
~æ~
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
I'
~
OMMISSION
- '--
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-85-42 IS HEREBY REZONED C-1 THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1985.
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
. .
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
i...
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'-
Planning and Deve1.opaent
Department:
SubJect:
Proposed Zoning ,Ordinance Amendment Section III
8/26/85
COuncil Meeting Date:
, " PZ 85-90
Agenda Number:
L
and Section XnI ORDINANCE NO. 1268
f
L
At the request. of a representative ot North Hills ~lltbe Commission directed the
drafting of a Zoning Ot:din.nce Revision to allow a Pet Stè?re use in the Commercial
Districts. The Commission noted that, the denial of this use as a retail trade was
probably an oversight in the Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission t'e.commènded that Section III and
Section XIII of the ZoningOrdlnance.be revised to include the Pet StQre use.
L
r
L
f
I
L
I...
L.
t ~
I
, '
i...\.-
/'
, I
J
!
~ Source of Funds:
¡, .I,
, Bonds (GO/Rev,)
~ L gper~tlnll BU~
~ -z;2,¿ ~z.~e!urø
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Avattable \
I
,
i
:......
RJ(/~
I City Manager
CITy COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
D..,.,.. 1 ^f 1
,., ( ; ,rrll\;
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
July 25, 1985
(
(
Mr. Tucker said he could not disagree
with Mr. Long, but he would not want
the city to have to pay for the
dedication.
show the
and will sign a
Mr. Royston stated
covenants signed.
Mr. Long stated they w
dedication on the pI
covenant.
PS 85-43
APPROVED
Mr. Tucker mad the motion to approve
PS 85-43 wit the stipulation that the
owner sign covenant or legal'
document tating they will dedicate
the ri t-of-way on Bedford-Euless
Road nd Blackfoot Trail when it is
ne ed for widening. This motion was
conded by Mr. Schwinger and the
motion carried 4-0.
"
·~·.l
4.
PS 85-45
Request of Harston Gravel Company for
replat of Lots 5R, 5R-1 & 5R-2, Block
3, Industrial Park Addition.
Rick Work came forward to represent
Harston Gravel Company. He said they
will show on the plans fire hydrant
coverage and will dedicate an easement
on the south side of the property. He
showed a copy to the Commission.
Chairman Bowen said they will have to
satisfy the City Staff.
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PS 85-45 subject to the late arrived
plans being approved prior to going to
the City Council. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Hallford and the
motion carried 4-0.
5.
PZ 85-90
Consideration of an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance No. 1080 regarding
allowing Pet Stores in C-l zoning.
Chairman Bowen stated this had been an
oversite on the Commission's part in
not making provision for Pet Stores.
f"
!
L
-~
~,
CITY OF
'NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
! Department: Planning and DevelopJaent
.....
~ubiect:
!
L
[
L
L
L
I
L
[
¡
'--
L
L~,
I
L
,:..;,.. 'I M ' 0·8 /z6./85
vuunCI eetlng ate:,
Agenda Number: PS 85-32
Plat Application ·.'jôh'eAddition Third Filing
This Application is pre.ented for Final Plat consldérat1.ori of the John's Addition
Third Filing. The property ~s located on the east side of'I)avis Boulevard south of
the St. Louis and Sout:bwestern Railroad. The property inv~l"'ed is zoned C-2
Commercial. The purpose for th..proposed plat is to divide the property into
commercial tracts for 'Clevelopment. The plat proposes a total of 5 lots situated
around a cul-de-sac street off Ðavis Boulevard. .
The Engineer's review of the plat contained two it.mà 'for,Coumdssion consideration.
(1) Located alOl\g the north and east boundaries of the tract are existing
earthen drainage channèls which" the Engineer has 'dictated DlUsthe improved by the
installation of concrete lining.. ,Based upon the contention$' that the existing
channels are covered by perpetual ,maintenance agreements<withotner parties and the
subject property contributing an insignificant amount of ~ff especially to the
north channel. cthe developers 40 not accept the responsibility for either channel.
The Engineer and the Staff disagtèe and suggest that the ,applicant be required to
provide at least one-half the cost of both channels in compliance with the
Subdivision Ordinance.,
(2) The proposed Highway Department improvements to Davie-Boulevard will
include the construction of curb and gutter and perhaps underground storm drainage
along the Highway. The applicant should be required to provide a contract of
voluntary assessment f01;'these items when the improvement project is undertaken.
RECOMMENDATION: The Plttnnin81lnð.Zeming Commissionapproved·~he final plat of John's
Addition Third Filing with the stipulation that the CityCout\cilshould make a
determination as to the'distrtbutlon of costs to each of the adjacent property owners
for the channel construction.
Finance Review
í Source of Funds: Acct. Number
! Bonds (GO/Rev,) _ Sufficient Funds Available
l Operating Budget _, ..' , "
~~'~UM f-!f¿~
I , , ..
L CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance DItector
Page 1 of 1
- .'...==è <1...
u., :.t.~-~.
_____Po..=--:. -
, -~:-:. cr.
PS 85-39 \i =~ 'I
J. :! ~!'~/) 'Î
~~--:~ 7.
-,:::::::-~-=~~ ,;';1; ~ ;~'b :"';~' ',' " !-~¥'~.~
;~-~.~-~!t, · ~~}±t" '. ~-'~-"; _i~,,=
~p~~~~£ ~ Ps 85-35 ·~~·,~.·N;fJ$ifii7 ,'~ª e;~:" ;n' ~EJ niL. £I
~~~= ~~:.~'~:' \. r¡; :~er ,il-:,,~f~,~, . ~ ... 1,1 ..
--:::~ .' -§oJ-=-==".,..~¡:p, '. -..1 JI I"j ~'tI~':1:'" ", ,'-" '..
-""'----~~=-:-cci!Q~~~'-'~" . -'.' ,·:ô:>Æ:·;¡ ~ -~.;, ."_
'l\'.,"""~~ª~ª~~~~~~~ " Ór-~è¡ IC"'!e"I~--p~·,."t~ ""'ïç:-' '~,~ I
\'·"y...,\,?=i§'êu . S '~ ;~~~\:~ ....' .. ~§j :~ 1~tÞ. ~~~ 2::: E:,,:t~ ~... Eþ-ï;O'-4 11h'
; - -:\\~':->{¢~~=::::.:t ~:~¡!~'.\,~r~~~::,1,"r:'~~~~~~~~'" ~.~.'.+.·~i III·N.. -:J~--:~.:- .=-.....Æ;, -~...1' I~~ _ .,ff' . A~
~-" ---':'", . -·-cP·",',1....._. ~"",...-:.~'-J: .~,M~?,.. --7'1\.::¿." ,. .. :~!ltU _ l-I-"',",[ff'.~~
¡=- - - ,=c<:=='=+---=---...::::=~i1M"~." "-,'~ '----, ,,::,..--,'. -(...:, "=.'=":.."'~-..~..'..." /' ~. ._''o.:_~ '1~::,j ~(¡.'!:J1 '<>~1i'"
'...~.1-,I".~,,~':1-~"~'~ ;:;.....~ ---'.;:..."'" - :~=R·' ~- ~. -~-._' I.~ --......u.L."1T f::Â
=:t=:'--~;._,~_~'1C;:':::;;; > ':.:,;;~ ~_= ~~~:-~~¿oSc ~~~:¡E~f!t.'tfl---= - - ~,.",..~
~~1.·-~.-~:s=:.~ =:::---~I .."~MI' "';4· ~ ~ ...~ _ t=?~-:-~}-_~ ~~-F'$:r ;;.;~H A& ~.~ ~...r ~'''Ç.
_::--~'<,\::-?~~~E~~~ "--, : ~~ =§e,.~:,,; !::'oJ;''''IE;I~ C" e. ~!: PS 85-41:~ ",'0i'-"~.:r-
~:::c<:;:;1~:;;;:;.=-J~~=~:, c·, I '. ~"' :~".~::.:,~~. .'. ~~~~~. .:.~~~_,". ~ ~~E~:j
-~==:.~ JjC:~~ ¡ , ';,--~_~.. i~( ,J~ ~~[7/ "",En ii
-- .. .~.,'~ :~=c 't.~ ~ i c·, ps 85-29 I =¡ -'- -/1 "h" -.-: '"' ..J v' /#:?r-'-:~ _ Jï
. ;;:~~~-: J -- III-I ~ . =-:\""1- n.. I l - ,::: :." ~ ~, jGIII-4 I";~ I "'-
..t ~- ," ,... '·.,.'1 ~ .<. L/ _,,\ .',. 'i ..
._;~-- c_ -~ , '=-.:--"'''':''' -;--~' _¡r:=",: -~g~ Ii /" " 'f""-j;~ l§
"==--~ ..;.""=]:::',,, ,- -'~==- ""P.é;' , ./c-"... . "-:¡:::= \.FÕ' .'.
'-'¡ òO~~ ;~(tz:.>~LI'e;: ~;T ~~'= 3--.,: ~j j,.~~ Þ¡.. rüi~' ],. ;,.f-.'iR-~-~;:;7;~:~;., ~
=¡;~~y~~..,.. . '", ~~ "I, ..'-L '';J_L..-...!.::[!.~, ¡:'. ~:~~;1'" "-=cii::~::"",.~ I
,~~~I:'~~- ;:""" t;:~~~\.. hJ§¿;~~1~~3~::~Æ¿:-:~f-::~ij~~j R~
_-·,,·t "'~"-~ ,.~...;'.,~;:;.'...'. .<::.. ¿:""'. ~, ¡,;g.. - =-=""'.. ,~,-,,"';;"':Ft,-,. -ë". //,..) ~ ".!õ::tr:::- ~d1" I ._
~:.~.'C"=--...~="-'E~_.I,,;;,.<~~~~ ""'=-". " o.VL_iÄ~' .,.., ~,...~ i~" ,"_1"" .'1_\' " --' ..._ ~ __
~~:2~.:2~§?}t¿,'?/;:?f:ftL~~~f~Jj-:.,-$¿ .~;;:¡::...~;;,'fYc:.; c~~'" . <". §. P.
.-_~51 E:l;~~ ::::.2E~·~.,.....~N. ~! ~'S ~,'. ....~7 $-' ....~ f:"1~__' .'~ ;.._::;~/""" .-l _ ,__:_ ...... i '~~"'" . ç::
.~R3~ ~~~'~?;~:~~2¡¡;:'~='£!. .>;' <?d X~:.=~ ,~ þÝ . ''rh c·, PS 85-32 n' ~
n '~:¡;;1. ~-==......é ,.,~:~.. :::;1" i _,~ W/" "--''-~l -'"y .~ Ile"ll' II' ~-== [1' .!~, ¡;;
-~,;',~d'-=€ '~~-:7""F ~:~y,~ ~"""ê:\~,,::"'~' / e-, ;~q: J)~?$]t ~ íí I" --¡
.~~-::.... -~£~"'~~~~~--=~~7;~ ! ~ ."'.F AG f.~"" ç~~~- -¿¿-'~:-;;:;-¡ r~ ft-Z 6:-,\\' '\
...:..¿:-==- -:;{j'JS:>':?é'~2~·.':·,\,~;~';'~ "I'" ~ .,:'l;" U "'~"'l¡i~;" N-" ·~T' '\, \ t: [.1,
~~."'~~;;jþ;~:'~--= ;....:.=:::..~~ ;iy.- \ ~ \.'. " ~ ~.-?IfJ=b ~H· AG "-:I
,-~F·~<,*::¿;~;:'-~~,:~1 : ~ ~P'-a~ .~-!. ¥ \ 11'" ,~'
--," ,.f1~;;".~~':.B.·:·<~':~"//~__~~ ."' /~ V "':';¡0.~~S,.~~y;;:-".hI ),} ~ ~!,
i )~~'-r----L~.~ ~;;...;:;:;.: ~ ~-;- ~ ~ j ~·::-f ~~f-.o~~~< ", 1·1 H: I //:.,
-"_J~-t,~t'-;.....~,< ---~::.." ~'': I' . '^'-.... -_vy,~,=-~ ~c·' . , , , I H /,.::::
:--¡:; t;:,'-.",co- :-'I-~::'f~'-::;3 =--h~- . -;;';;.t:t::tr~t=-:..:" H~..r.. I I ." ¡ , ~ __':
--""'; "."= ._!t=', =~.~ --, fi2:J,.-. "'.~ ,-. :::.:;:r¡:~ -_........'-J:»"'~... ' ! j,/ _"..;;.-.
. . "-r]" R-·-:.,..u..:~~:'r-t--" ..,"i!:-"ftð .~~" òu·c·, ._~".~".. \: ,,;/"
- ~"bJ// . d , " '~~1-¡(;,-~f~:: )/ ~~Y:¿-'~~I~~ì.{~ c7!'-~. _ ..~~-::i;i~::::;: n~ \ .. /J' ill
..J .t / t~. -::::~.¿-;-;¡:¡;: 'f p.';;;;::~:-~~I2'~~.f;.::' --,,-0.-----.. . ..~ : ¡ . I,
i' ß' /' J'~ ~:,';I~..:,;,:,:.~ ',t': I'r':':e-,,,,:~~~;Z, I c" if: ~L~~ - : ~., :,'
,'" ......, . ~;"::2:--';t' ~.:..-~=ø..:.:~' ~<..~~.'¿~. ._~.~? .-:.....,7.~!:- .--- .::;; ...-_...J '4..f~ ~
// / , ; .~: T~:.:-'~:;;;';" ""'<" ;1 '¿:~:,.i'~ """<:(-C' ". '......">' _' "'=- ,), ._._. ::,,:'" ,"____.- ,'. .
_-;-:.7 // CI1:1 -= '~-_Jl~..-......:..~ISV I ~~1:::::.....:.\;\:r:~.'t~1·"1_"" h-~-.r...--! ! ,-1}___-d_. l1li-"',""
,ý"\....// ~ ~ 11'. " ;::~~:;" ~::. :r~.... ~~~\Ç....._~~ '" ~ --": OJ ~..,.! " 1,',,1
/7 ''---. J..:..:.=. q ~T'''' ':rm:'!t.'g;· co' ,;.;;:."c'....." ~U . '..:::: "<>__.
: ;'!-=--l~r~' ~ :;.:=-7.. :1'·,·... \ =;~~...."~\":.:.;~....'t'.'~ ~--', u
. ' ¡ Ie'·... "'r,~¡¥:-I~ '\ \ :~':);-'\' \..[]~ I ~':'·~-¡¡:~L-;' , \i ~,\, !~
'" ~ ; >000:, ~'- .. ~I \ ,~~..'\' ~ ;:, . ,;. ~ ,..,'... '.'. y .....,__~;~~~r
H.. ..:~~ ~..- ~r~~ I~->" \';:;;;"'~:::~~]"...J ~; ',;,r ~~.' j: 1\ c"",,I_ ' .
-':'-;;t..;.¡.¡. ~.rl' :t.:.l..''''',\ \;.<:,'1·-- ~,"==,e"",,'.' ~ . ~ __"
/ c", I c.! I ~ .. .., ~_; ~ ~·;;::V·:~ ~,-=:~~ ~~i ~=-=':;~~2:J .~c.~,b~~i--.. - -:-, ~ !..; .:_~:
--" . ~n a-r ~- u ~~~~' <I t~:- .;'~-=..::.::.~ ... -i ç¡- "" .~ t." 1','$ .-Þ-". -r .........1[ ,
.~ ,.... -........... ':~ L '"-)'~.AI" '. ~.;1 ' 't>rl L.j-" " "co 'Ji¡'" ~-6' L-
~ -............. ~·~if(\' '··~\PJ '-""-"~- "'_..,¡;..~~ c, J _ -
'-- ~r. ''',':':'<U.'..: ,., . ' . .->""-- ~~';;".l.." ,",' )'~<h~.,~.:>c, ",....., ~~I. __ _ - _----',-.
I..,... t-·· ··..~F·u.....:s---....:.~. ~ -;"~ ¡;"!f _~.. ¡ .~.:a-;'" (:2.-"" 4 ...,' I ............... __ j
". .... ....'. -,. -'~ -J. !i;'~;>i'/"ii//..l":ñ; ¡ ". ,p J.~\' ';'" .~~[i ¡W" .~,:~. ~ ':, ...,YJ ¡-' ~':I 'i~( .', c". . '-. I
>-.. ~ ...... ¡.... --- ~ .",I"~":-:'; i - \..:.- ' _ ~, ¡ ." 'I~"_ '"", ~ '
........ \ ".', .\ ~.,,'ï· ..;...~, ~'::"-''';'~_: ,~:::._. <. ,-. ... ':. .'. ,..... . ( !, ! ':' 'r.'''o
~. \ .~,,\. \. \: . ': -. ::.. .....~" .~.~= .. ,..,~', PZ 85-58 f , i : " . "'t'
--- \ , . .: f -.::::-:- -=-=~_t_, ; '~~"'~:';" ........... _::'~, . . :., "'. : ' . . '
'< \~ '.'.,.. '. -';~,: :-:. F§;:.;:;þ~--;;j:;~-~~i::\:;-j "'." -~':' iT î:' ,~, I rp ".. ¡" -_ -
" ~,_ . "1 ':~.:.~ .-:~: I,:~t:~ ~ ,'1 : ., . ;. ~ ,-':'-,.~ _ ~
.
.,
.I
--
"',"-
J
"
-ì
.
-
"'-
"
,\
!
"
:¡
.i
:i
'I
.!
,:
,¡
!
¡J
'I
.
,
Ii .
:1
I, ,.. "
J
'.
,
,
~
-
,
VI ..
-t/751' - ~C=ë
.
-~---~-.
- --.----.-"--.-
_ow
.,
'"
--
..
-- - ~
. -. ~
._0'
.--
:)
..
-
~""2_
.'.
o
~
.--- -~--
"
" ,
.1
ITIIIC
.-
~~~:
~-
~
'---.;
{
e~r"
bn
..
"
:
"
¡
--
"{'..i"
('
(
'-'
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
JUNE 27, 1985 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF JUNE 13, 1985
'-- "'--"
1.
PS 85-29
2.
PS 85-32
-
PRESENT:
Chairman
Secretary
Members
The meeting was called to order by
Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:35 P. M.
Al t. Member
Dir. Planning & Dev.
P & Z Coordinator
Don Bowen
John Sc inger
Georg Tucker
Mar rie Nash
M k Wood
oe Hallford
Richard Royston
Wanda Calvert
Ms. Nash made e motion to approve
the minutes written. This motion
was second by Mr. Schwinger and the
motion cried 4-0 with Mr. Wood
abstai ng since he was not present at
the eting.
Request of Richland Village Joint
Venture for preliminary plat of
Hightower-Multi-Family Addition.
David Whitaker, Engineer, came
forward. He said they have submitted
their plans which were approved by the
City Engineer.
Chairman Bowen asked if they had the
water retention approved.
Mr. Whitaker said they had on a
preliminary basis.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PS 85-29 with the condition
that the City Engineer and Staff are
satisfied with the comments of June
17, 1985. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Terry Sisk, J.B. Sandlin
and Mike Sandlin for final plat of
Lots 9 thru 13, John's Addition.
~
-: ". <1.
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1985
'--
PS 85-32
APPROVED
'- .
3.
PS 85-33
('
(
Mark Long, Engineer, came forward.
Chairman Bowen stated there seemed to
be a disagreement on the drainage in
the channels.
Mark Long said they calculated the
amount their development would
contribute. He said they figured 6%
which they will agree to pay for.
Owen D. Long came forward. He said
this is an unusual case. He said the
develo~ment to the west of this
property put a culvert under the
highway and bought a 25 foot strip of
land for the easement and now sold the
other 25 feet to our client. Mr. Long
said the land was there but no
drainage ditch. He said the developer
is coming back now wanting to put in
another culvert and needs more
easement. Mr. Long said they would be
happy to participate if they would
improve the ditch or work a deal with
him. He said his developer has no
obligation on the north ditch and feel
they should only pay their share. Mr.
Long said let us have a perpetual
maintenance agreement. He said he would
be happy to handle our water but
please don't make us take care of
their water.
Mr.' Tucker made the motion to approve
PS 85-32, but feels this is a legal
decision and request it be passed on
to the City Council to make a
determination as to how the
distribution of the cost should be
made to each owner. This motion was
seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion
carried 5-0.
Reques evelopment Corp.
or preliminary plat of Chasewood
Addition.
(
(
.
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
\"-"
May 3, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-844, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
JOHN'S ADDITION,
3rd filinf-LOTS 9 THRU 13,
FINAL PLA ,
PS 85 - 32, GRID MAP 88
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following
comments:
1 The preHminary results of our Drainage Master Plan Study indicate that the
existing earthen drainage channel which is located along the north side of this
proposed development should be concrete lined with a 6-foot bottom, 2:1 side
slopes, 3-foot minimum depth, and an 18-foot top width, with a flowline slope of
0.60-percent and a 100-year discharge of about 150 cfs. An equivalent section
based on more detailed field data and analysis would be acceptable. The existing
channel is presently located in a IS-foot Perpetual Drainage Easement in the
property adjacent to this proposed development. If widening of the existing
channel cannot be accomplished entirely on the adjacent property, then we would
recommend that this developer be required to participate in part of the widening
cost by constructing the improvements at this time or escrowing his prorata share
of the construction costs. If this concrete channel liner construction is not
accomplished, all or part of the lots adjacent to this channel could be subject to
potential flooding, especially when upstream development continues on the west -
side of Davis Blvd. We will be recommending that future developers west of Davis
Blvd. be required to enlarge or parallel the existing 48-inch storm drain pipe
under Davis Blvd. which discharges into this unimproved earthen channel. We
estimate the cost of the concrete channel liner from Davis Blvd. to its
intersection with the east line of this proposed development to be about $127,000.
2 The developer is proposing to construct concrete channel liner improvements of
the channel located along the east end of this subdivision as required by
Subdivision Ordinance. The Subdivision Ordinance further requires that these
improvements be carried at least 100-feet downstream from the proposed
development. We are recommending that the downstream channel be concrete lined
with a 20-foot bottom, 1.5:1 side slopes, 5-foot deep, with a 35-foot top width
(or hydraulically equivalent section based on available flowline slope and a
100-year discharge of about 680 cfs). Preliminary preposed design of this channel
is shown on sheet W-5 of the Drainage Master Plan. An easement or permission for
the off-site construction will be required.
......
,
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG,· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
"'- ..
(
Subdivision Review Letter continued
(
JOHN I S ADDITION
3 Zoning should be shown on the plat.
4 The survey name is misspelled in the title.
S The proposed 12-inch water line in Davis Blvd. should be shifted eastward and
located in a dedicated easement within this proposed subdivision since the Highway
Department is planning improvements in the near future which might conflict with
the water line if it is located within the Davis Blvd. right-of-way. Also, the
"existing" 12-inch line in Davis Blvd. shown north of Hollow Wood Court may not
yet be constructed, according to the Public Works Department. If this is the case
then the proposed 12-inch line should be extended fully to the north line of this
proposed subdivision within a water line easement parallel to the Davis
Blvd. right-of-way.
6 The developer should be required to escrow his prorata share of future paving and
drainage improvements in Davis Blvd. along the frontage of this proposed
subdivision. The proposed new Thoroughfare Master Plan calls for a future P6D
section. We would estimate the total construction cost of this section to be
$253.19 per linear foot. Escrow should be in accordance with Subdivision
Ordinance requirements or City Pol icy. (See Cost estimates in Thoroughfare and
Drainage Master Plan Cost Estimate Report, dated March, 1985).
7 Any construction within the Davis Blvd. right-of-way should be approved by the
State Highway Department. We would suggest that the owners be required to pay
their prorata share of a future 12-inch water line along Davis Blvd.
8 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is
responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance,
Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development
Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed
upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in
writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if,this proposed plat is approved. If no
such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains
responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the
regulatory codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
TfI~É.~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
May 3, 1985
PS 85 - 32
PAGE
2
·' "\ ~ .,.,
\---
-"'-
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, I NC,
CONSULTINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
December 3, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-844, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
JOHN'S ADDITION,
LOTS 9 THRU 13,
PRELIMINARY PLANS,
Þs 84 - 111, GRID ~~P 88
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following
conments:
1 A portion of this proposed development was previously submitted as Tracts 9 and
10, Block 1, PS 83-74. A block number designation should be assigned to this
proposed subdivision along with the lot numbers 9 through 13.
2
The limits of the offsite drainage area which discharges into the existing
48-inch storm drain pipe from the west side of Davis Blvd. should be shown on a
topo map on the drainage plan to verify the 34.74 acre drainage area size. We are
presently in the process of studying the drainage in this area as part of the
City-wide drainage master plan, but have not yet completed the design of the
drainage facilities which are located on this development. Although our study is
still in progress and our recommendations may not agree exactly with the developer
engineer's design, we would not recommend delaying approval of this proposed
development on the basis of drainage considerations. We would, however, recommend
that the City reserve the right to require ,the developer to modify his proposed
drainage facilities design after approval of the plat if our study reveals that a
major change is required.
3 A note on the drainage plan states that a Perpetual Maintenance Agreement will be
granted to the City for drainage channels "All and IIBII located on this proposed
development site. It appears that most of the channel IIAII drainage easement is
located on the adjacent property north of this proposed development, but a portion
overlaps into lots 9 and 10 of this subdivision. The dimension of this overlap
should be noted on the plat. We would not recommend that the City accept a
Perpetual Maintenance agreement unless the channels are concrete lined. As
required by Subdivision Ordinance, channels shall be designed for 100-year
capacity.
4 The drainage plan contains a note which correctly states that a letter of
permission will be obtained from the downstream owner and the downstream channel
will be checked for a 10-year capacity as required by Ordinance. This letter
should be furnished to the City before approval of the plat and the downstream
December 3, 19,84 PS 84 - 111 PAGE 1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
4. '.,
, (
Subdivision Review Letter continued
"
"---...-.
~
JOHN'S ADDITION
channel capacity check should be included in the plans.
5 The developer should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 8-inch
sanitary sewer line located along the east side of this proposed development. We
would recommend prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one half of the 8-inch line
for a total 1 ength of 497.84 feet.
Please call if you have any questions.
~W.~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
December 3, 1984
PS 84 - 111
PAGE
2
OweGD. Long and Associat,f}nc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS-
June 17, 1985
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Plånning and Zoning Coordinator
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: John1s Addition - 3rd Filing
Drainage Ditch
Dear Mrs-.- Ca 1 vert: .-~..
The developer has agreed to pay his pro-rata share of the cost of
the drainage ditch improvement based on his percentage of run off
that his tract will put in the ditch. We have computed that our
client1s share of the cost of the ditch to the north would be
approximately 6% of the total. His share would be approximately
1.7% of the ditch to the east and 3.8% of the downstream channel.
~'-
Sincerely,
//~?~
Charles F. Schulze
CFS/am
.
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 I Hurst, Texas 76053 I Phone (817) 281-8121
-._"-e:'P
.'&. ....~
,..;......,........
., ',' ,;~_ i:'".....
"'-" , (
-~......-
"
-
,A
OweC·D. Long and Associate( Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
...
''to~. ·
June 3, 1985
Mr. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: John's Addition - 3rd Filing
Lots 9 through 13
Final Plat PS-85-32
'.
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
We have received the City Engineer's (Mr. Richard W. Albin, P. E.),letter
dated May 3, 1985 pertaining to the above referenced additon and have the
following comments:
1.
With the existing drainage channel located to the north in a 15 foot
Perpetual Drainage Easement Agreement, we were aware that some added
easement might be necessary so we set off an additional 10 feet for
their use. My client does not feå that he should have to improve or
pay any of the improvement costs as the channel is not on his property.
He further feels that all of his proposed pad sites can be set above
the potential flood elevation. We have tried to work with the developer
to the west through his engineer but have been unable to come to an
agreement.
2. We have not proposed a concrete channel liner on the channel along
our east property line because part of this channel is also within a
dedicated easement and carries a perpetual agreement. Our proposal
was to expand on the perpetual agreement by agreeing that the channel --
along our east line either be escrowed now or concreted in conjunction
with the development of the property along our east property line when
a final acceptable plan can be prepared.
3. Zoning is shown on the plat.
4. The misspelled survey name has been corrected.
5. I understand the the Texas Highway Department has already issued a
permit for the 12 inch water line in Davis and also that the existing
12 inch water line as shown on our plans is in the ground.
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone (817) 281-8121
·..,;.'.'4.,.....'.
," -t-.,..~
! ''';-~ ". #- .
..., ,è"
.....
_/
-.
~
.....
.1<
. fl
(
(,
"".:/'
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
-2-
June 3, 1985
6. The Developer is prepared to pay for the lateral storm drain if
any is required and the curb and gutter adjacent to his property
as required by the Highway Department.
7. . Any construction within the Highway right-of-way will be approved
by the Highway Department. We also propose to install the 1211
,water line as per our engineering plans.
8. The Developer has been made aware of this statement.
Please give me a call if you have additional comments.
t;JelY, £)
Owe~ng, P. .
Consulting Engineer
1/£
ODL/ml
cc: Mr. Mike Sandlin
. . ... J~'~'" '_',."
.
... ,,_~.'......4'
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
This Final Plat applic:aciontEÌpresented for consideration of tot 9 Block 1, Mollie B.
Collins Addition. Thep"ttop08ea8u1:i~1vision is one lot loc:atedon the west side of
Smithfield RoadatMickeyStreetò~.tract is currently~oned,C-1 Commercial. The
purpose for the plat is to allowde'Velópment of the tract.
The Staff noted that the,proJ)Ø8f!dp+atinclqdesa (lO)foòt:¡dêdic:ation of right of way
along Smithfield Road. The Thórou8tlfare Plan requires a tQtalóf 68 feet of right of
way on SmithfieldRoad.\~eproposed dedication is moret~anadequate to accomplish the
needed right of way. Smfr'thfield Road is improvedadjacett.t>to,thisproperty to 41 feet
of pavement with curban~>sutter. The ultimate designwtJthis: 48 feet of pavement. No
provisions are made on, th1isplatto widen the street .Hòwe:~.r,.the City has set no
specific priority onthe'wideningnorestabl1shed a polic:yregatding the developer's
participation in this 8itl1~tion.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
8/26/85
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PS 85-46
Mollie B. Collins Addition
i
L
.~
In the Engineer' 8 c:onuae.nts it was 'l1otea that drainage from this tract is to accumulate
at the west endatld flowontoth~.ac1~acent open tract. The applicant must secure
written permission from theac1jace'J.Jt'land owner to outlet the ProP'osed drainage.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approvec1 the Final Plat Application
PS 85-46 subject to the Engineer's comments.
r
L',,-
L
r
L.
,
L
L
r
¡
L
,
¡
L
Finance Review
. Source of Funds:
L Bonds (GO/Rev,) -
,'Operating BU~dget' ,'. .. .,.,' ,..
" .. ........ .. Z
L¡~¥~~~ß~o~.:(. ., . . ·~~ ty~r
L ,". ',. ClfYCQUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
, Finance Director
Page 1 of 1
'-f6[~~;:=III·~t--i I b
J.Llu L 1/
"-tTEÍbE I
"'X;'[-tg'-'-' "~.'_. ~.
.... '-1::1_.' ,,-2
,,/ ( ,. - :~",i~~
:~~.- LJI·~1t·f/·1--
'10(, .~
.' .
,'(,,"-' TTì\
_~ì
--¡-..-
: -,.,. ---
' ~~~':.rM==
~r
J:cl
~~ r
-J
==I' R-I
--1
~
Tn}-
f I p~.....>'f\-- ';;:"-t5Õ~'-i:
¡ ",/:",;/ ~I ' 8 I ·t~;¡t:¡-i+-t=r ¡ [;C; 'U~;- -0 ~ E
¡2:/i,~,~~~:,~~ 111-2 C-2 fj;r~~~",~~ l
¡.J. ...J 1,.,In."~, YJ {~ - / liT.... ~
,~~Þøø ~ ~ ~~I Ed Ë c- 1/1 ffi~i:E!~êi ¡", ",.i.)L[ "
~. ,> r'r'-"\f- I c-,. -~ ,I,. ::t:,-¡'=H'~.. \""- j~'. q~ .::
! . =~,-i- f-t-J;:: ,--", :." -i--.{f--1 v I- _ "'- 1 iT! I-
'R-2 ~~I- 1--..=',' +2t.J-Í-I'--:Î~[j I-- ,_AX::::tt '-
; ':,71, '- ': "H27-q_L..~'-, ¡' J T /71 I I: _,
, " ~~R=~2-:(t+t: R. -7-M. F '--:-'L~~:~GL ut=2 f~, '1"lL.. -A.J A~G ! ¡;;!
. '~I- .... ",=:::= ~-=t=h- fTTT. , ' I '. I
! ~, ~ ==ti LUL I ¡ I I I r I ,,~ ;R-2 ·;"ìètÎt~+:J~ t' , i I LR
I I r ¡H Ii, ". ¡ n- ,'RO I !Tn~ AG .. c-
H~\.-- ". (-¡"t"i'"f R\)"~-
~. JJ. ;J.LlJ f-+..." i 't.:.J?SjZS';".!~n>--:Ÿ"" \for. . ....;
........ '/"'!lJw r H-::~r--r-N-' '::>/!1 '];#./% 11ft] _:...fl--...:c
-- -+- J:T¡ LI1H. -n .'."¡L.::; .....¡~~í. I., \1
= - ; j I rÚJ)1.~ ==f-J _I~ o::j~ / -- jf
~ :-/fiCi"n'f- :=-~ ~': 1i ~ ~ C·, c-, ,ii:
I- I, H f:: R- 2 -& v/' i-' ..' :Jl
:::- l:il R r= -.r' t:::
= n , l _,¡ I rn ;:::mm jII: r-"'-"',..2~ ,I-/- ==j I r
~ PJ~t..,. -I ~ f-- r-I ¡...::'- . I ,,;Ì¡t
'- -dJ-J' "\ f-- r-, r- -. V
- ..;; PS8S- z~,;.\ r..l - I- r- _,1--
..... £ RIARIW ),,"~isr: - ~
" ~.5I3'·'''1..f '/'1 _.,.- I Ijl 11
'frP "'"/0 is;~~'':rr7'''' ~~l I 1 i ¡ r I ' 1
~ I Ii' i r~cr H' 1--'..1._ =-il I f:3l i IV A
R<rc.,ry' III r +-ç¡. ¡I,': IJI /1. ! ,. i 1..1 ' 1/:r:.'7'f. ,"
'E Mr' ·L!·i~~'~_~tZ&'1'>lJt!o~ I i I
. ,; -7 L~ ,!'i1~~rh~lf~~~ I
-, I
R-3/157 ~ R 2- 1
. ,~OO
¡ 7.. - ,..- PS tt~'44 "
AG I- ~ I' $PR~ú MßAØIIWS: /'
L ~r::: f-- .j '"
o of-
~~~~ ~ ~
- c-_ ~ !It- J~ nTl 1094 n ~A:-
-~ ~3 U ~ I ~ '
, =:f-I-;f- I! I..:J~, J.LR c=- I~/~/ I 1:(2I..
- -- I-.. v~ J Cd, ~ R-2 ~l-'-L.
;/-:; 1091 "'..? 7--;V I ~n-n.
I j í I I f ~ - nl I I ¡ I T J.=:J·W!:IF.: L Ii, ,~* ::t/"./ ,~ ¡¡H-H-
I '''J.. I ¡ I II T 1 I u---O,'- I C-2 ê- ' ~ M"N I , I
I <-1. r I llr I It II I ~I ~:-..I ""'~ I fTIT "I ¡;P [,/ l:P-R-2
' 1"1" I I T15/. IT';': ./J.. fL I- I r: e;;v l I III~I
/ p'''I' T ì t r! I '-;Ii!!. ,,- J2'....h t: C-2,.-,.-:2- AG 0 ~I .
' ""- L Tr. ,~r::rrn 1 I '" (h.... Y.~ r V./ >--__ PSS)-,].. JUNI.'
-.~ / - r~ I iT . II;, t:fID. '\ 1/' _(t'" '-f ~~ 1-2 - ~~t",'j SIJN':Y~/ tl:.
J\ -- /6¡¡~y/LITI . rrTT\~· K~~~,;.,ì I ·".ØI~,,"T~FIUÞ -PS!!~~ ðÁ~2~:"I_
r \ I~Sf-.D~(J111 I/iTTll\\ W : Tf{ en J 7f---¡I-2Am,! i"f..~S" 1600 ~
,{Ø>-.- ~ t=,_, T T II! rrTfT1 r' 'R- =,' ~,~~ ¡-----¡L~/ ~~ ~ .P,'~/R-I'~
"./</ //~~~J¡~ ~ EtEmLqIIuèBT 'Ilç IWÆ/ '::-M,...4 ,~~<~*;~ "'R'L..5-Œ~~;!hLul'~111 I .-'-,It:¡ '-
'.., '.',. '''.0,,' f-, ~ð 1\ é- / 1 ~~
'/ {f'<"¡;l'ì",""Y~,),1::Sf( m - 4 ,.,.Y'-~ ,I '-,. .--f
;" .~.,,, ¡(:y,/>..;;,<. y 'U 1111-.. .., .",;- ,i,'à¡, ~~./:;'¿-:i JJBz: f-- -i---J AG
J .1_' .,' ........;/J:.:;f:i"....y(1 T l t:, I I ~n T I-{ ---'--~ITfT"71'· T '/ 1':":"'1 . 1;/' c-
.~ \//~"."¿:'~~ ;Tri~.:;·,~p~~,~~/AG{111 ~.-.¡ C~5' 0h' ..'- ~.-
'//Ì'ì 'Î'~ f-L..-< ... ~--;:::::::: T
"-i~~, llDi'· T II "·~f~\::---'-- --.; ! c-, _ AG c- . ~.' ~~h~ ~E
\ AG ' ~ tøJl I- ',1 /.../ I, I~Ç "~., ,"\ ~l- R-;:
'.,/,p.\AG _~ , ~ ,,:tllt~~1 kf·' ~ LLft-''''''~.:,.'' X ~-¡-f '0"
\ ~~v - ~, ,"A, J·.ln ~.,,, R-2 .\~; ~
J~// R-7- ~ U q." ~ I TTT "\ ~~'
:-::~, \ MJ"/ ' ,\ ~~_.~ C- ¡;;:;;;.... ,\.7
.., \: \ 1-::, .. \\~ \. r...'I' ~~r-: C" R-7-~\~
') ~.(. . ().... U '5~ R, -, S.U," - Ù
,1, "It· ,', 1 U___I ~ U 1/33 -, R-3
y, ,... '4'. :b~-o:
--l);~r·filt§è ___ , ~~ - -\ IJ~ J 7 - ~
i -~j~\3i~Cf{iJl1Rill tiJ1lt\~~"~]~ ~;~ 1 !
-,ITì-r¡ ~_.. ,_q 1 \ .
~. ~
.--"
AG
1
'.
~..~
R-2
1118
,.-. .-
..
AG
"
r
It! IT
'R-I-
'800
I ï I iT¡
I ,II i I r i I
t--
.
c
I----
~
"õ
\
¡
F.P.
Page 2 ~
P & Z Minutes .
August 12, 1985
',--/
2.
PS 85-46
PS 85-46
APPROVED
3.
PS 85-50
PS 85-50
APPROVED
4.
PS 85-51
-'-
PS 85-51
APPROVED
5.
PS 85-52
PS 85-52
APPROVED
6.
(
Request of Jack Roseberry for final
plat of Lot 9, Block 1, Mollie B.
Collins Addition.
Chairman Bowen stated this plat was
also located on Smithfield Road.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-46 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lot 3R, block 50,
Nor'East Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to
PS 85-50. This motion was econded by
Mr. Tucker and the motio carried 5-0.
Request of
for replat of Lots
Block 1, and
Addition.
rk Joint Venture
OA-R & 10B-R,
2, Glenview Park
Due to a c flict of interest, Mr.
sted he be allowed to
from voting on this request.
Tucker made the motion to approve
85-51. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0
with Mr. Wood abstaining and the
alternate member voting in his place.
Request of Williamsburg Associates,
Inc. for replat of Lots 1R, 2R, 3, &
4, Block 7, Industrial Park Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-52. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
Request of Notre Damian Corporation to
rezone a portion of Lot 1R, Block B,
Calloway Farms Addition, from its
present classification of C-l
(Commercial) to C-I-Specific Use-Sale
of Alcoholic Beverages. This property
is located in the North Hills mall at
7624 Grapevine Highway.
,In response to ,. now ton-English-Flowers
':"1~ 85, we Offer;thefollowingresponse:
:., i~iiJ~#;¡,L~~~~~);~~M~i~.yj¡,il1~~¡~~~~~~~it[~~~t;j~~(fì~~iiï~¡r~Wì· .
1~¡(Theowner or this' property Isagreeab
~;:~?;'prorataonexisting uti,li ties .;>;,;",y:,:c
;l\~:^;:~fAt:;t~~~'fi~j;þ;,~~~h{i¡~(~j~~~~}~¡g!.~w,j:H~¡t:N:):~¡: i;';;;:i;!;~~~':(/(; i'~;t, ,
.;'~The··owner'-of this proposed lot hasbeenn . contact :with;
, F\the adjacent property owner to the west,'andálthoúgh"thi
>"0)a.djacent property owner has stated verbally"'that, heéioes,
' ' ,',. - " . -,'. . " . ~, - ' ., ·-\1 ", ,.'." _. "': '~". d·jl - .¡,'
not have any objection to the development, of-~his'lot ..
refuses to~ign any' letter or grant any eas emei1t: 2
,¡. . I _.,' "',".- , i _<_: . _ "", '
'Concentrated~low condition is existing and wil:.J.::.
,:. " .' -- ., .,.,"} T ";. :' I''''':' " ,';....~ I,~'i·.
:,::,continue,~o,.~exist.. ,until downstream impro,vemel1~~'d~,J."~'
i:1?'he Oi:ty .is"çontributingto the flow by. discharging
;/iwater ~out of, the strèètwhich also contributes 'to"
flow'èoncentrå'tion': ',t~f" .,\: '
,i \1J,:.i¡;.4,~!~~.tWfíi#;':1.t.l"'.:; (.,.:lf¡¡¡.·~."J..·'~."~i¡; .. , .. .. . .~''''.'~.j~ . . :;;
/~l·."~,1~;~~.~t~U~-1~(~,,~l(~:~f,;r.1~1~~~~,,~,:, ,Y., ...., :,t~·t:f, _~, .'~~. ,
,The ownè'r 113' awáre"thàthe 'is "-responsible or 'a
-.,<¡,.\.70rdinanceâ.nd 'Policy "requirements as writen
,:J"t';",; 1 t' d · :",;¡,;,¡:~~1i:;""i,,'):H-,~:/'."i'Ì,,~r:>f.ìi,L~¡".,,",;,'1/'
':t~r~ ,-;, ;¡q~;~ ~ .í;~:"i{·::r,~e0jg~j:;4~?:';~~¡;'~17fc~:;~·;~',::::;?:f:;5~W,'~:'f)~*~;~i~~1J~~)¡~~S;-}:(f, "~I,:: .\;;'. ":'" ....
:F';/}fgif.::W'If there 'should be any further 'questions, 'please call.
-~¡i.~~!~';'~f,;~~~&~~~~{TI~~f~~iJj(~~t?I'I'~j,!Bì!¡:~'í~r;~;;'ik;:+
, ;t',,;'¡.., ',.' , ~R . Stembr Idge E ' ."."" ·,>,'>~,~h"·,,·c:,,,,"J>,", "">"""4"'",,1"','" '"
- ,,~;;~I~~~, ,',D~~let, .'k:¡·~j~,"::;~fl~:j¡,?¡¡,;;,".;¡;;;¡f{¡·" \~;~1~¡¡'~.."/{~,~/~f;:...?i:[¡~'~:j:
;;:¡'''''''''':J~;i;'''cc, : Mr., Rodger N . Line, Oi ty Manager "';';'i~f0~;'\i;,e~;',.;¡~~!~
';:~;,:;+;;;;, Mr. Gene Riddle, Dir. of Public Works':;>'il;':';:,:>;r
t,.!,t;:;¡.'~~,.Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Dir. of Public 'Wor
~'7'1-'.?~,~¡7!-t~Mr. Richard Royston, Dir."of Development"j:~
~~;~;l;~h~Wl~I¡;,¡~~~tl't~Î~i:~i~:~¡~'\.~:;·¡;¡~ì~t~~ fc%
t::",'",,;:~-;_'!i 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland,HiIIs,Texas 76118e ,(817,) 284-1363 '
~..~~,;'.:~~_·~~:;~~~~.,<~L;·t~èlk~~i+~_ti~~Ä~l~~~\¡;~~~;~~~L~,Jk¡.~;~~~i: ~~~~~iM,~~~~~:,
"--
- .,,-,
"
(
(
"
;
.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
July 23, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-906, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MOLLIE B. COLLINS ADDITION,
LOT 9 BLOCK 1,
FINAL PLAT,
PS 85 - 46, GRID MAP 69
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 Please see our review letter dated May 2, 1985, PS 85-28, regarding
prorata and escrow considerations.
2 We would remind you of comment no. 6in our May 2 letter regarding
permission from the downstream property owner for concentrated discharge
on his property.
3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
R
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Djrector of Development
1901 CE'NTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267,3367
-
.
(,.
(j
"
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
'--
May 2, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North -Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-906, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MOLLIE B. COLLINS ADDITION,
LOT 9 BLOCK 1,
PRELIMINARY PLAT,
PS 85 - 28, GRID MAP 69
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the fOllowing
comments:
1 Platting on the North has different block number on plat from block number in
metes and bounds description.
2 Utility companies should be contacted to determine if any easements are required
to serve this lot. .
3
-^",,---,
We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been
provided for this lot based on the 300 foot radius requirement for commercial
zoning.
4 We would suggest that the owner be required to pay his prorata share of the
existing 6-inch water line on the west side of Smithfield Rd. We would estimate
prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for a total length of 92.92 feet.
5 An existing 2-inch galvanized water line is located -along the south property
line. This line should be shown in the utility layout plan. We would note that
the Utility Department has indicated that this line will be abandoned when the
Hewitt Drive water line is constructed.
6 Concentrated stormwater will be discharged on the adjacent west end property
owned by F.J. Karlick from the southwest corner of this proposed development. An
off-site easement or letter of permission from F.J. Karlick will be required for
this concentrated discharge. Storm drain inlets will be provided on Hewitt Drive
to pick up this flow when it reaches Hewitt.
7 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is
responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance,
Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development
Codes unless specific discretiona~ variances and exceptions are made and agreed
upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in
writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no
such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains
550 FIRS': STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
S ' b'd' .. R . L tt ('t . d
u lVlslon eVlew e er con lnue
'--
({
MOLLIE B. COLLINS ADDITION
responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the
regulato~ codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
R&i::trø~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
- .'-,--
May 2, 1985
PS 85 - 28
PAGE
2
L'
~ " "
CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS,
¡
I
L
D'epartment: Planning and Develop1a8nt
L..ubject:
L
Plat Application
Lot, 3RBlock 50
. 8/26/85
Council Meeting Date: .
Agenda Number:PS 85-50
Nor'East Addition
L
I
I....
r
L
This Replat Application i$presented for consideration of Lot ~i, Block 50, Nor'East
Addition. The·property ialoeated on the southeast corner. of Lola Drive and Roberta
Drive. The tract is zoned C-2Co"~ci.a1. The purpose for proposed replat is to
dedicate the necessary easements. and fire lane to allow for development of the tract.
All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat Application PS
85-50 as presented.
,
, I
~
~
I
~
I
~
~
¡,-"
~
L
---........
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. 7:f1.f ~
ent Head·/Signature City Manager
CITY CÒUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Dlrec;tor
Page 1 of 1
ì(. '~. ~;~~~~~\I~ r61/~ ,1-1-- ·
.oJ . ~. ~ Ji~ ~ ~hí ill) ~ -47-./ · ;
..... ~ \."'1 . . ~ N-r4Lì ~ I"IT r I)-//-.- I/'!.::./ J i r
¿ -, ~). T ç.(. Y~m -1 TTTl' ~ R-7-Mr- ""'7 : ¡
, II, I I \ , IT~ ~ . I D It,,- -J;~~S.u, I~ .
-+-J 0 ~\ I I I "R-- r I I I I I I I 1 I :¡; tl- ~ ¡.....¡... '. [C-I _ ~ t5-f/í"'-Vl\.
~' ..... ':' '" 'I- H , \ I -.. .' I .....- "--11 ....,
=t:. .T ,;.r .:.. ~ :-' L.J. J. \ Y' :---- ''----'1f;! \ \ ~
Lþ..., ~~:!Y r- C-I \ ~v = __-< ~ ~ "f- » I II
ï ..>.r - ~ ---L:I.. l::( \/1"'\ ,~ 'I] c- ž PJX ~ ,~ I I I
, .L ~~.::~i-µ = .Y. ¡... r\K~ c~ ~-&v ___ - ~ E ~ PD -7 I ì I
I i ~ ~~ ,..... 'ÍÍ t:::. ¡.. '\..¡~ ~).., ~ '- - ?,,'" ..;r¡ :. IT II / \
, \ "\,\ \.TT I 1\ f J' r-- ~ ~ ?\ &~ II C-I J-I! Till
J; \; \~ ~ ,I ~;P' I I- "'í kJ - --:r I ~ M F ~ f-. if1 I III
. iì~"- . t4 ~~.~ 0 I I- . ..(t:1. ~ ~ý...v-........... C-I~:"- ~_ r- 1 11 0 " _ i:.0!
; i..r¡::::R ~ / À~, ,..- ~: ,._r i\ yJ. ~ ~ ~ Y\...y-___)~ .,_. _ S.u,·.. ~'. . I II I 1 = c
,'f...+-:!!-' !::..\ ~¿...... . ~~ k·..-I\,7 ~ 0 ' \"--; ~=r::::J!-T'.., ,.....
. ~ H-:f- J!' ~~~-- {L \ ~' ::<:'~/ I, 'EB~H-i" .....
=1 .J!L 1'·'(: . r ~ ---y 'R=:i 'R.-7-MF- . ....p..j~ ' _
::::::c; ~ ! I! ~l": I If I In _ v d )-\---i 1- V~~ E3~! ,. ~
71 I! .........(~T II H I I! 11, ¡fHO-D' r'" I-r-:' . 1".... .....
!LIIlI: I I (\, ~!R'7.!MF ./ 1 ,~ III 'I ::I.... c::::y r I: I '~ ..........
_. I~ 1--' c- I,.' . ~ ~y~~ r- ¡:; _.0.....
I - ~ /~, o~ k-~k\'Çx Yt'".Å ~~
/- ~.... ~ --" , \.~ X /ry ~.A [I.. 1 II I II II I I _
~ r-~ f- :;~...,!:::~/--" \ _ ~ ~~x:;y)."('~ L !:::.tí:- ~ - T "
-, ~ . \ =..... ~"\::v x .I.\,. _ 1=
-=- :v~~ \ \ '- ~'Ç "~~.À~ -ý\ ; ~- t::!/ K!- ..... +
~~ 'R 2 \ ~ ~\~ r I-- a ~! =
:.J ~~~.. ;::..- \ F.-P. ~ ~y I.- , - _' R-7-MF _
1 ~ ~~ '" \ \ I ¡.-jt;: R-6-T R-s.T ~
~\ 'I '-/ I I I, . í ' ! I rsr&.b. J "l"'oU . ~ 1128
~o ....... Y1.. ~ """ , ) A../-~ -, ~L- ... r-;-'-"" __
? "'\ .1......... ,~. '\<A, "- "'....._ -- 00...... I I C-2~ : 11151 "1 ':": -:-;-
I \ 1!iI I .o-,.......~, ,¥2I~/'9.I ~::: ..":::... I ~ff,'~..,~ ~ '- _ i I II ; ¡ ~ H.l H =
L """~ 1'--,""" I 2 ~ II r KT H-
l' III, ,~ It'!:'= =
T II ,/! III I 1 I I t i I ~ I- ¡I L If-'-" F
T LllJ I \ I\..' h.......~ \(! f- t:::: "
'-"').. I ¡::i-I rTï ,-.' ~I I .. I .. 0 I- II'
U 1 II -1l-î-1""-, - '~- ~ __ 1--1- ~. ~ J ~~,..... I- -
~'- - ,/~ ~. r,¡ _ f-1--J t:~ _? mn- ï ;\ ~~ t:. V
-........-. 1--- -. __ _'- -g I- I L -1 "'f- ;1
- ...~I- , ~,'~~ +" rr\-~ -It h~ ill illll~.c. 111'IJ)it' \\000
"" -- f-. ~ I 1 . ...-.:... 'I I I I ~ r 1 ~ / ¡...; L...
-J~..~ n;;;;>-::,~\ Î I I~ i ~~_I I.. ~
Jf lillll/~ ., ~~\r~~i-\. ~;::.~ I~ tË; ~ II I~.&~ j_E
. r 1<19 I ì~f',. <#~ k' '\ R 1>- t .. (\--:1-"'-- I II I I X. ~); ~
r IL r-/'.i;' -= i"o..... '. ~~ .~. "\ '7 H~ ~ t---t- ¡ 'II ",<c Y ~
rr::f- 7,.7J. x"X "~l' '. H~I~t:: _ R-7-MF ~-f,~~
H- I !ì"í ~ _ ~ \\ ~I~I ~I= '....._ ~ ,. ~~ )... =
T I r,- ..J..' _1';( " .~ V~y. < __
¡ I \.. I I == y : \ -i~ ¡::. _C 2 C-I * - ).x~ '¥ -= ~
..,...1 "1J 1Er T
I ii, / '- I, i ~ ~ 1017 _ LR s,u,lt: ~ C- ~:r:
"I IL ~I~' ~ Cõ S.U.'II-\-·~ EI >
I I' ¡-f-;-I--r-,r-, ,1211 .....,~"-ª:~~. ¡.."... t"¡( ~I
'T I ' , ,'" \ t- " Î I I III ¡ I ,.......~ ....._. 5 e,.,;...... 1121J ì l C
¡I -" ..'J'oI. ~' ..*-'\ (..0..... I' -.r...
,! I \ I I I! r 1 c: \ N R ........ '''C ~ "št Of'''' .."''''' I.. \ S ~,
nT -', 1\ .
i If> I - +.\ r- = ~ "'''¡; If"".....,. C.R. . t-2 cs~u~ .
I ~- ..-f- 1"'-' ,~~ s.u. ezo
i~ -£~ -2§ t--r-- _l"~ )::z,m =:E t: ",~: - 0". ---.......
-T J) ~ ì ì~ --- .- ',~., C-2 c.......... C-2
~~~J ,,' J. !' I''::; C-2 " ..:-
)~ ,: 711 IT !; " '"
~~. WL IUIT5'G ~ "~' ~:~I
;" All" llll'TIJ , · . ¡¡-r7F r---..-, - ~ ~cA,';,I;A'f ,....,..,.
, ! /, \) I ....... " V,,11l(f,.6
~ / t ' , /.,-J \1J.,:
Æt£ I I !. I , ~r- ~ I~-I _ ,.-~c~~ bi1" ¡
~ H' ! I I I \ :.1 ' I ï '., v I' c~ \ ~ ~
'_~I 1,1 II 1.'_ !~">o..~ c~~~ \F \ . -111
r -7/ \ \ ' 1 ~ ;;rJ \ \ )
-r: I! /\..k=.. '?(v ~.i. _ '- \ :
~,
Jo
.,
I·'
-
~
r R:7-M,F
JUCM\,.....D
"18M
SCHOOL.
f'Ä
I
f":
~
PO "À
u~
I
r-
r-
, I-
=
= R-7-M
--
E
. -.-
Page 2 ~
P & Z Minutes
August 12, 1985
2.
PS 85-46
~
Request of Jack Roseberr final
plat of Lot 9, , Mollie B.
Collins Add
3.
PS 85-50
PS 85-50
APPROVED
4.
PS 85-51
'~
PS 85-51
APPROVED
5.
PS 85-52
PS 85-52
APPROVED
6.
airman Bowen stated this plat was
also located on Smithfield Road.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-46 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lot 3R, block 50,
Nor'East Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-50. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Glenview Park Joint Venture
for replat of Lots 10A-R & 10B-R,
Block 1, and Block 2, Glenview Par
Addition.
Due to a conflict of inter t, Mr.
Wood requested he be al wed to
abstain from voting 0 this request.
Mr. Tucker made e motion to approve
PS 85-51. Th motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash a the motion carried 5-0
with Mr. ood abstaining and the
alter te member voting in his place.
quest of Williamsburg Associates,
Inc. for replat of Lots lR, 2R, 3, &
4, Block 7, Industrial Park Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-52. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
Request of Notre Damian Corporation to
rezone a portion of Lot 1R, Block B,
Calloway Farms Addition, from its
present classification of C-l
(Commercial) to C-l-Specific Use-Sale
of Alcoholic Beverages. This property
is located in the North Hills mall at
7624 Grapevine Highway.
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, I NC,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 23, 1985
.
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-927, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
NOR EAST ADDITION,
LOT 3R-1, BLOCK 50,
REPLAT,
PS 85 - 50, GRID MAP 114
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in
accordance with standard City procedures.
2 Fire hydrant coverage protection of the entire platted area based on
300-foot radius criteria should be shown on the water layout plan.
3 The note on the water plan which indicates that all water services are
2-inch should be changed. The water service to serve the proposed
building just east of Building "C" should be 2-inch. The eight (8)
services to serve the building on Davis Blvd. should be 3/4~ and so noted
on the plan.
4 The proposed 6-inch water line which is to be located behind the building
on Davis Blvd. should be looped around the building and tied into the
existing 6-inch water main on the west side of Davis Blvd. We would
recommend that the existing fire hydrant on the southeast corner of this
development be removed and a tee installed at that location. The proposed
6-inch line could be connected to this tee along with the relocated fire
hydrant.
5 The proposed on-site sanitary sewer service lines should be privately
owned and maintained and so noted on the plans.
6 Any construction within the Davis Blvd. right-of-way should be approved
by the State Highway Department.
7 In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer1s
Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan:
,.
1901 CENTRAL DR" SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267,3367
(
(
Subdivision Review Letter continued
NOR EAST ADDITION
.,
7.1 I, , a professional engineer registered in
the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in
compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria
of the City of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the
topographic information used in this study is in compliance with
said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this
workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented
through proper subsequent detailed construction planning.
SIGNATURE
, P.E. SEAL
8 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed .upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
- PleE1=htü:nYãk:-
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
,
July 23, 1985
PS 85 - 50
PAGE
2
,
Lf . " .
/'.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HIL4S
L
!
¡
~.
Planningan4D4ivelopment
~bject:
Plat Application . Lots lAB. through 10BR,
, . :, ' : ¡ , ~ ; '- , .
and Lot. 10AR and 10BR,
Gleuvièw Park Addition
i
\...-
8/26/85
Öouncil Meeting Date:
BI'Ð~1f>2 Agenda Number:PS 85-51
This Replat Application is presented for consideratio.n ,of, Lots tAR through 10BR, Block 2
and Lots lOAR and 10BR. Block 1 Glenview Park Addition. ~eproperty is the duplex
project site on the south side .of Glenview Drive west of Jackie Lee Lane. The purpose
for the proposed replat ,is tò correct the dimensions of the lots shown on the plat to
correspond to the physical layout of the property.
All of the facilities constructed p~eviously serve the proposed subdivision and no
additional engineering is required. " .
I
L
,
I
I
,,-.
L
~'<
. " ' ,,~ ~ "', .
RECOMMENDATION: The Platu):1na and Zoning Commission approved l.eþlat Application PS 85-51
as submitted.
I
I
L..
I
~
LL
f
L
f
I
L
Source of Funds:
Bonds. (GO/Rev.)
Oper Ing Budget
a er
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds AvaHable
'~'fli~
Departm nt Head Signature ity Manager
ClTY COUNCIL ACTION/rEM
~,,' ' ,
[
L
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
-;::::::::.-- /:f ~..::~)0')V<.Q r,,&: <' U A ..-.-our t--f'- - "~ -.-
. lÒ . ~+~.~~\'f~ = psaS-'Zl ....TM .,CML..O ~:~TS _1,,1 I! 1\ II II·" '=t~'T~~
- ,., > 'r\y, Pl'~ ¡f~i e:.s: 'UM'O. M'GM SCMOOL i \ \ i :, ¡:. ,~-+- t
~ / Tl I I'\. 1A' ~I.·,r æ±HB 'F
R-6-T-PO (" \ I I :::D·~II!I~ ø: I I I I! I 111 I \ 1 1 -; r
__ ~~~-- ~ ,-' liT ;;'~Eff T ,I; ~'I
"- (~~= ;' T I~I- I~ ~ Jr-~4 I
f!:t ( ,n ~~/ÏlìT'frrrñ "--j ,. '. - ' , , , I r :I- ir ~1;
~ Ilìrnn !iTli .1 I \ If'. -'~~ ,,' \\'~'~3~:-C' ,r' ~'. ,,_~¿_
.' . . _ -, II" ,~~c-< U "'+-j~ : %B~ ' rn
~~~~r ~:Jr=8I- f ii' i ! I . I' ~ IT II !' I 0JIÖÏÌlE BJIlIIIII] W'
i /'.... ~ .. T I I : I! i n-rr -L 1 tl- 2! ~
...... .- I I I ¡ í Tel
~ I ~~ ' I I , I i---
-\
~ r- ; , I I ~ II R 1-..- :¡¡¡¡;; r-.J._~[, ¡ .
~<l'c I \ ~., / ~.. ~ ¡ ! ! I ! T --~I-- r- /~1"-' -'
\ í ;:x. '--' R-7-M ¡ f-l,- _....; 7
\Y"'" I 'V '-- -= tu --' rB ~
yo ).y~.1 Ii] V C-I - _ _TM \. I- - '~
~.~ C-I _= :~;~~.O '~=:::._, -.,>J
~ ,_ AS !lN4 'r ----:
_~ ~ ,~ ;~ R I ~~ ~~t~?~~, - -~- -4 ,
\<?~.-1'6?>1 1= T II L \.. Î"" i 1 W
..... \'~-J7Z'--'"""'J( - ::1-_ - r---r- ---_~ ~ ~ 1 RM-7F-
"\~,~~~ç\J-, ~ ~, I I Rt'7o-l- c::: _ ~
~c:;//v " ~ .:: _ ~ f-1 ow C-I.
/\W ,-- - iF':3 i~:~-5 -<__~! .~ ~-, ~..
~v r- - I,'DA~\IÞ&( ~I C-2. _ï= )-- ~~..
-.>'^r / C -j :. J- 'I I ,Z '-;1- C- ./"
[) CÞí- = . c- ' ;;;;I!t \ I --"I-
--¡,/~'w ~ I I' g I.,C_ 0 -mr ~r- ~ y
I~ ~ :- I .-,/~
_I,')..... 'rí IY~ = I LA: C-2 ----' 1 '1/
_ X IJrï\/\ \ I -_-.=! V
:..u I I I T 11 I I1II T I I /J I I I' II I I I __ I-2 C
l'~~,c:E: ~t ~ILl~VAX7,0~v I III -
~~;:r- ~t:: ~~~~ "~-=--
r--:, I- ~__ __ ~ '\.~
,£ f.... I
, -" L~n
, , _" - f'~ I 'I I'
, ~:--1 ¡- ~ '7,
. ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ii ',1/ Ii. I I I
~þ.:j LE 1--- :::: .,L' ! II~'A C
<" -t'N3", ...,,' f -G -t;::.::"1t' r
'fCJ, ' .~ ?--J.¡J
W. ..... JJJ:J ~ 1'I-i.A
I , ~ It -i. 11 II I I , I If I I I I 1·\ I tI
t::c.-I~
C-I ~.;'
~/. '- ¿ /,"~I
""
~
--
R-
--
, "
,
,
-',
-
-
--
'-
-
~
\=
v~
.U ,.....
==i tMl_
-i.~ ....
,
\
\ '-'"
, -
~r 'L~ CT MO,
R-I
~ F.p.
T-
,1. yþ
1
.
( ..' ..--~C1 .0·
..... ""
..
,
I' ,"
11.. -MF ..,,'"
11 \\7
1~ ?:
s.u.
"""T )
br'
- ---
-'
-¡:¡ _ ,,_ n
.
.,
-
o
~
I-2
.
~
-/
ZONING MAP OF
/
: ..
/i c/1
L'k ;
/') I // .d¿JAA¥/
Page 2 (
P & Z Minutes .
August 12, 1985
(
\..-
plat was
Road.
2.
PS 85-46
Request of Jack Roseberry
plat of Lot 9, Block
Collins Addition.
PS 85-46
APPROVED
Mr. od made the motion to approve
85-46 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 5-0.
3.
PS 85-50
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lot 3R, block 50,
Nor'East Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-50. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 5-0.
4.
PS 85-51
Request of Glenview Park Joint Venture
for replat of Lots 10A-R & 10B-R,
Block 1, and Block 2, Glenview Park
Addition.
',-
Due to a conflict of interest, Mr.
Wood requested he be allowed to
abstain from voting on this request.
PS 85-51
APPROVED
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PS 85-51. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0
with Mr. Wood abstaining and the
alternate member voting in his place.
5.
PS 85-52
Request of Williamsburg Associates,
Inc. for replat of Lots 1R, 2R, , &
4, Block 7, Industrial Par dition.
PS 85-52
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made
PS 85-52.
Mr. Sch
5-
th tion to approve
motion was seconded by
and the motion carried
6.
PZ 85-89
Request of Notre Damian Corporation to
rezone a portion of Lot 1R, Block B,
Calloway Farms Addition, from its
present classification of C-l
(Commercial) to C-I-Specific Use-Sale
of Alcoholic Beverages. This property
is located in the North Hills mall at
7624 Grapevine Highway.
',--,
·
(
)
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
(
..,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
'-
July 23, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-975, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
GLENVIEW PARK ADDITION,
L. 10AR-10BR B. 1 AND B. 2,
REPLAT,
PS 85 - 51, GRID MAP 147
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in
accordance with standard City procedures.
2 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
'- ',-- applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Plïë:~ Û;~n~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
1901 CE-NTRAL DR" SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267-3367
¡ .,
l
CITY OF
·"NOFlTH RICHLAND HILLS
L Department:
/~
r Lßubject:
L
Plat Applicati,.~ "Lots lR, 2R, 3 and 4 Block 7
,..,. 8/26/85
" qGuncll Meeting Date:
PS 85-52
Agenda Number:
~ - zo'" '_ '_:,' "".:.;
Industrial Park Subdivieiòn
This Replat Application 'is prësented.fQr consideration of'Lots1í.l, 2R, 3 and 4, Block 7,
Industrial Park Subdivision. The rty is located at thesQU:thwest corner of Rufe
snow Dd.ve and Industrial Park . ~.The purpose for the.ed plat is to
re-subdivide the lots along cur t . crimership lines to al1~ òr development.
,One comment was noted fr. tbe Engineer's letter for C~·fs8i01).consideration.
Originally the plat ~a8 àub1Ú;.tted with no additionaleqineëting. However, the
applicant's Engineer reepo114ed to the comment in the,,:téf~èr by providing the necessary
plans. At the Commission. he.ring the City Engineer 'indicatêd that the plans were
satisfactory. . , . '..... .
- ',,;:,t .;--.-~:
,:_>::;;.-,,",':, _ :'_:,;~'\:c>:_" " "
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning ari4Zoø1\\g Commission approved the Replat Application PS
85-52 as submitted.
r
l..
L
L
L
I
L
r
L
LCj
i
¡
L
L
L
Finance Review
Acct~ N).Iff)!,er .
Sufficient Fl.Jnds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
~ng~ _ ....
C e . "E~
· . . ~-:_ --f . _ _ -- _ . m _
~ ~ ·~I Hetìslgnat~, c,.- ~anager
L ' CITY'COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
-
,Finance Director
Page 1 of 1
:i.Si~ r ~__. ~
' ., U I LR 'I':~:r. ,It I I I I I U T ~ . i:!'
~twi li"L-1- fit!! T1Wl ~lrrg'~' '2:.~ ;::!~"4~('
~ 'j'" 1 I iI. <"'t j I I 7!:- -t-, r: -< , "-'>-'"
- 2 II I - I ~TT ~ u..L "-f.. .. "i 1 __= ¡::' IT' CI :J-:h..
/' -~ ~ ~rrr 'í t:.., ~ ~'-" r.. I r èJ;" d= v""": i ~
~ ~ TI.l!l.é., LJ-- 1.11 \" T I t-i.....1t'!!! I IbL
H ::¡ ~ ~ T I I I . I · '- u..L , , Frl'1=\ :r r-rn TT LL.i.S:
>-- . ::tJ>-" l \.lJ 'In I !" I uJ '-=-= 'i Jr+ H ~r i ~
. -1t ~'Y.J..; B I ~"::." .. T I ~ '...L H-iF.T I ~
J..41.- .. ""ITIL.. n .... It t I ". r 1- '1 . . I . I I I .. -¡-
.~ I- .. .""ø. II , . l,Lj '- ".! I '-,-
~ rc=::: ~I~f "f:. ::'... .... «ø" _I Þ1rn '1 r I I JJ I '"...,. ]I
n r L, \- ,~~ .";} ri"rTTT ! +1 b::t:rnu " I In I I , . , -'_
IT ~L 'C' ,-"0. ",! JI[l~ , -"T I I I I ffi~ -I c::t= -'.-
[~.. 1..1 '.LL ~R+rt 1 If T I- "~ ct: o//~.
I'" ~ 1e .J 1r ~ II- _ rl:::. u-.z:r:
'~ IT' . -J- :T, ...r L [ ì""[. C-
. ". ....". t: TT Tr. - 1\ lí Y. "- ..._
¡' : I I . fJ31Wj:: ¡, It if- - :::.:;- .. --', .. J-- 7J ;
- -
- .J.' q::¡., " ~~.. -...\.--w Wr~ Þì' II, . I . I Iil.e
~, fj.E8:'¡:¡\' I .lJ3~ "'J ¡::'H't l~' u-fB~.. .... nmtPTì¡:
- -;D- If-J! -h' -ffii:i. ~, U~, t . 11" I '~~ EITIJJII.IJ:I 'iT !. 11Jf...~
- ;~;:: " I!~TTI" '" Il,""[ TI~II,I,!,111I Ii T .lj]::!f~ _, 'I: ¡ ~
- -. oJ '0·"" TTI l' IT" I T,·!P_ --' _ .lL¡ III w~):!,
:::- -ilH:]~~_l]li+l-!+i HTr.J.';:' ., 1111 ->- -::~ h-17il .!ilLV'~
,'-. . 'I)J-i 't rTl LII¡:: T1' IT ilD..Jt"'H T -' 't- iTf-. \-- - L.U I r"":' 11 ,\\~_
~\ " ~ ~Tlli..,~, æ-~ 11\
~. I. >- ''I .1 I r ,I 1 i T 1:: T i ð"':J r I r........,
\ ~ '- ~ ]" T ,\ , I : ¡ U- ii' Tf I -r.,.,.
;r IïT i..+-Í >-J ·I...-L- ~~h __.
\ \ ~I / : L.J
. ~\IIII!II~
R-3
I
"'~ L ,.
1-'
_/,
::...---,
./ ,
/ \
\
R-2 \
F.p. \
-~
R-7-MF
C-2
C-2
C-2
1164
--- --
.
---
..
-
--14
'0 .~#... I
"'..' ",.\.
.0
~.
..
~)
.........
-
-r-pc
Page 2 (
P & Z Minutes
August 12, 1985
(
--,
2.
PS 85-46
Request of Jack Roseberry for final
plat of Lot 9, Block 1, Mollie B.
Collins Addition.
Chairman Bowen stated this
also located on Smithfield
PS 85-46
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the mot approve
PS 85-46 subject to e Engineer's
comments. This m ion was seconded by
Mr. Tucker and e motion carried 5-0.
',-
PS 85-50
APPROVED
. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-50. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 5-0.
3.
PS 85-50
urk Collins Investments
for rep t of Lot 3R, block 50,
t Addition.
4.
PS 85-51
Request of Glenview Park Joint Venture
for replat of Lots 10A-R & 10B-R,
Block 1, and Block 2, Glenview Park
Addition.
Due to a conflict of interest, Mr.
Wood requested he be allowed to
abstain from voting on this request.
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PS 85-51. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0
with Mr. Wood abstaining and the
alternate member voting in his place.
5.
PS 85-52
Request of Williamsburg Associates,
Inc. for replat of Lots 1R, 2R, 3, &
4, Block 7, Industrial Park Addition.
PS 85-52
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-52. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
6.
PZ 85-89
Request of Notre Damian C ation to
rezone a portion ot lR, Block B,
Callowa s Addition, from its
sent classification of C-l
(Commercial) to C-I-Specific Use-Sale
of Alcoholic Beverages. This property
is located in the North Hills mall at
7624 Grapevine Highway.
"-
"'"
',--
- "--
~
(
(
,)
.,,'
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 6, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-897, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION,
LOTS lR, 2R, 3, 4 BLK. 7,
WATER AND SEWER PLANS,
PS 85 - 52, GRID MAP 102
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 We have no objection to the proposed water and sewer construction.
Before boring Rufe Snow Drive, however, the contractor should verify the
exact location and depth of the existing 16-inch water line in Rufe Snow.
We note that the proposed boring will be within one-foot of the estimated
depth of the water line and, therefore, unusual care should be taken
during the boring operation to avoid damaging the water transmission main.
2 As a general reminder, the Developer or OWner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
~) (JÁ
RW AI r a
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
.
1901 CENTRAL DR" SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
-----.--,--
~}1¡I;ti;~~;t 't:"tt~iii~¡id~~iili[f~tJ'~~~~i~lr~~~¡,!~
;':,~ p:j!~,.L¡cc :,:.L.,Mr .",.R,odger ,N .',Llne, ~l ty Manager;,:~:,!!<:.1':,;;:j',~'J'
~:iØ, 1J;~ fdk;Mr·i,,~Gene Rid~le, ;,Di~,ector of )?ubl~c Works :~:~Íi ,. .". '.
j't.~,;.¡!,~.¡;,:;t'fi\;":i,:,-:,,:,Mr .,;:,;Allen B~o~stad,Asslstant Dlr. of Publlc Works ':;,Ln~i';.'
Y,;',.*t, ''"','''.,' 91 l,\::~r,Mr. Richard Royston, Dlrector of Development ,,¡.i: ;""¡" I: 1¡'¡~~
-.." ,,,.. .' ; --', ',. ,". I' , . ...-< . ~! .~ . ,.r". v ' .. Ý.
.1;'1,:4 ~'~i¡f;i~/,~¡J¡~':!' .',;;! ,,<·.,.,,/¡¡r,:'·rJ¡'H~íI'j~·¡~'~Hi '~"j1~h~'j"':'" <I',·, ¡.. ", i""",'1-'~1~1.!,:A¡\" ,~I . d'(";,
(tf¡;1¡~~B~I¡itr 3\;, : ~VtI\;f:~;t'1:¡ ¡¡,j \¡ :::,] :,i;i;~¡J':,:;¡¡{:.;: :;;':t1IT;;:!!1¡~¡ii:-~r1::;}'f;
i~>·:·~·,.,~..L;.,f,{{1¡j'~.·~:l¿:'J;~', ~ lXii, ·t"Z~!. '~'~1'~..:¡~t 1t....'~,'·'1.~c·,~··,~·-·.~~j';.1~f:~~1 i,~'¡~f,~t~.a[ ¡~ì..,~.~.. ..t....;,,-~,..~ þ,ot: ,·~.t1
ii-::C :,::.:·~L-¡'»;~ ";":;:'-.<' .., ~ J;"'~.";~~;/ X.'t'~(~I:(~ '~'!/' :'~ ". ,1,J ~. '" '\' .:~..; ...<~';...~~.;.~ I ,~-;:, .t.~ t~(~'<~"J/''':~ ., ;-~.~
f. ;·':::{ '-~".ii.~.j-gf!I;~·· ..¡i+.~ :~:~:;;¡ I~ J r" ~~~ ~~ i~\!~)t~' ,,~~~..1~'~ ~~t'~~ ~;"¡1 -::,.J,.\j;-. J.i} IN.t·~ )t~Á:' ~.. 1'. ,IJ ¡ "',,',f; J:.,\ ,,1'1~
~_:i~1";:~::',:jf·:::;~!~::"-'-':-T;·:·:!~ ;;}~~~~'.. 'ft"''f't1j'~""..; ..~: ,l,"t~~::~;¡·"L:¡t~'\..'i.r·t. '. ' . .....~;¡~ I -;'-f".~
-~"~ # ",,' 'i·' " , ''''11' -','U' h"""1 ~" ,. " '1;,..,., .....·'I'..,"'.',¡,·. .~.. ,'. , '_
;.¡1~V_~~,~':;·.-'f ~'-Y;:~' .' ,f . ;(' . . 4,J \~'1t.;. ~:rf1!;"{ í.~~:;'1 ~ï ~ }..¡r/::' ~<'1 "i'f ';';\1 ¡¡~j,h~~~~:: ~ .,fr~ '::
!~íl,H"; " P',(1 :¡f~ ~·~;f :HH1:~;.:(.;g~'{¡ i} ·1 ;f~' f' "-,~r:'f 1#1' ;;:',; I,
~r.,., j1j~~~SJi~~}r;',; ,:~,~:';'}~t:r~~2>;,,;: ;;' <~~ijL~;:f/ {?~~,_~ ;'\':~:~:~~~
'i!1(~~h 'f'.[<;;'"~.:~t 1;i;I." '·'t'i" ' ',(.>1 tj¡'!",t" ' ,"~ 't;fl, '~" , ;Wt.,:tr'" ...)~, ;'_.,;t . :.~\"~
;""¡{'~;;1¡~~~;t'¡~: .}¡iir¡~~~~~t,t~t:::;,,~¡~:,;:,... .... . ,~;, .~~rJ'¡r' "'¡"~
"",11;; ",·,,'·4028Daley. Suite 103e. North Richland Hills, Texas 76118.e(817) 284-1363 ,. ..,.'~,j, . '.' '''è.'
.:, -, '::~T~~~~~Æ¡;~~,~";;~'U~ti;.,¡¡¡;z;åt~H¡~~~"~~~~~'µ~~·:·":'\
e,
(
(
'I
"
.
KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS,INC,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 23, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-897, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION,
LOTS 1R, 2R, 3, 4 BLK. 7,
REPLAT,
PS 85 - 52, GRID MAP 102
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in
accordance with standard City procedures.
2 Construction plans have not been submitted to our office for review,
therefore, we cannot comment on any engineering considerations regarding
this proposed replat.
- .''''-.-
3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is apptoved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Pl~:eaz:.
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
'-----
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
---
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
r
I
L
-,;;
Planning and Deve1.opment
Department:
~ubject:
Plat
Council Meeting Date: 8/26/85
Agenda Number: PS 85-60
,
,
I
L
L
This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 6, Block 1, Carder
Addition. The property 1slocated on the northeast corner of ßedford Euless Road and
Blackfoot Trail. Thepurþose for the proposed plat is to identify the tract by Lot and
Block Number in order' to re-deVelop the, site.' Thé applicant has indicated that his
: prospective tenant is to be a fast foo4 restaurant.
,In the Engineer's letter the', questiòU is raised reaardirigthe proposed right of way
dedication on both Bedford Euless.1.Oadand Blackfoot Trail for future improvements to
. this intersection which includes Melbourne Road in Hurst. The City of Hurst had
requested that right of..ybept0v1ded.for the widening of.Bedford: Euless Road. The
'Engineer's comments support this.reques,t and also suggest a niÌ1e foot dedication on
·):Blackfoot Trail in order to plan for a future extension of Helbou1;:ne Road to intersect
/with the Freeway Service Road. The applicant has suggested in U.eu of actually
dedicating the right of way at this t1me that the'propert, be identified as a "Reserve
.~rea" which would be dedicated in ,the·future at sucht1me as' the plans are fully
"developed for the intersection. In the mean time 'theapp11cánt would be able to utilize
the proposed right of way as a part. of the site pIan. Wh.n this proposal was first
made at the Preliminary Plat hearing the Planning and Zoning Commission agreed with that
approach with the provisio that satisfactory documentation'could be worked out with the
City Attorney to protect the City's interest in the property. At this Final Plat
hearing no proposed document was sub1J1itted but the applicant did note that his attorney
has contacted the City Attorney àndthat a document would'be provided prior to the City
Council hearing.
1
L
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commissionapP1;:ovê4 the Final Plat Application
for Lot 6, Block 1, Carder Addit10nwith the followi1;\lstipulations:
L.
'..:...
(1) That the proposed "tu!serv:eArea" futurededicatión béaccepted subject to the
appropriate documents befnaexecuted and approved by the City Attorney.
.\
(2) That the Plat reflect a37footb~ilding li.ne On the Bedford Euless Road
frontage and a25foot,building line on the Blac:kfootTrail frontage.
i
l
L
¡
L
!
L
L
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Oper ing Budget
er
Finance Review
Acct, Number
Sufficient Funds Available
f
I
L
--r--
. Finance Director
¡
L
Page 1 of
'. J
....
- ... ,R-3
- .......... F.P.
-¿ ..... ........' ,
~.. .... ......
. . '1liio, _..
---'-.. -.....,
. ................,
1/'. ,\ I b
"\ 1 '
R-7-MF \....... '
)<,\
\\
, ,
I I
C-I I.. J '....
~ .'. ,I~^",\;:-I "
\~ c-r ~a/" ~ .j
1=1 ="IIR 5-0 'e~ V~~: I t ~PO
'J:.1:j ~ . I\: ..i'í ¡we ...... "'ft-J "-.
; Ë' 1131 ¿'¿I \ r;. i4! ~
]~/;;ç¿~ ,-:', ,,~; -
P}/Ò~ - ...
JJ :: >- >->- '\
~ -: :;
~ : ~ - t~
;1!" I--
..~
~~..
~~.
\
) ~-- ~ ~"='
'~
.~. ~L---
.J C-I L----
(v---~ -----
t:! -¡.. ,/ : 'P585' ~ ~
ï' / 'P~I ~~~L~I 6- I- - i-
~. ~_¡I. - 1.,:F.If!J ~ .......1-
_~' / l I IÃ9:£ .~ -IS.U....... - ~ ~_
II J_ t ~~,l1. \~ f-~
: I ! _ / I~ ': ~//
\' ~ All-f--
; C~r! -, , I - i rr
\11 " ...r" ~ t- ~~ r0-
C '. 'S ..-/~ ~~I I;:
" .I ,.,~
....c-IS,U.· C-I S,U.
'-ÃAG I,
,Ò;-~
-2 ,~'.
..
· R-3.}. ..
-
>- " ..' :: ~
..
i :I ..
I ï 5.".
-+- I
d
,. ,
, ./I'\.Vl \..V 1 \JI' B
.....r 1 ,'J
II I II
III IIIIII
; II I I
..L \ I
1 1111,
I :, I I ¡
MI..
Lli. f-
:~
-....
Co r. T......II,.Þ.
..
I I'll/,
,
-
_c
~.,
L
-
i::
Ë
i-
S·T
21
.wi
%
I
I C-
S.[I,. c·;
-
...
À
PO /"'\
~~U
/:
I
l
J
'\ "
" \
\ ~
\ ,F.P.
, ,
t ,
1 ,
'J }
I I
, ,
I I
, 1
I \
: I
, .
\ \
~~~ \
I I
. 1 ,
I \
, . "I.e-I
-_ , F.P.
, ,,"
t "--......_.,,,
~ if,' R-7 - '-1F
I I
',J t
,
,
\
,
\
\
\
\
\,
u
-
I-I
~
f'E
'" I--
-
f rTTI ,
'/"1 II liD
I-I
\...
AG
C-I
~
...
~'Þ
+'"
,<-
+
C- ,
, I
_,,' J
00-'
~L,
8J~
:r r II
n . - M
I
--
/'
./
PS 85-43
C.A.Off~
I.."'"
~S-J ~.("D
'CA~;>e¡e
L.t- 8.1
,
/
f/~
~
-
,
, .
';
, .
.' ,
-
-
, .
,
.
-'-'
"j
(
(
')
..\
.
KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS,INC,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 9, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hi11s,Texas 76118
Re: 3-898, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CARDER ADDITION,
LOT 6 BLOCK 1,
FINAL PLAT,
PS 85 - 60, GRID MAP 134
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 The 300-foot radius circle of fire hydrant coverage should be shown.
2 The new Thoroughfare Master Plan proposes Blackfoot Trail to be
designated as a C4U Collector with a minimum 68-foot right-of-way width.
This plat shows 5-feet additional right-of-way dedicated, making Blackfoot
Trail 55-feet wide. The developer should be required to dedicate an
additional 4-feet, to provide 34-feet for his half of the street.
Technically, the Subdivisiona Ordinance states that the developer could be
required to acquire the additional 9-feet right-of-way on the opposite
side of the street if you so direct.
3 The plat notes that a portion of this property is being "reserved" for
future widening on Blackwood Trail and Bedford-Eu1ess Road. We would
suggest that the wording be changed to "d~dicated".
4 We noted in our review letter dated July 2, 1985, that the Thoroughfare
Plan shows Melbourne Drive to be extended northward from Bedford-Eu1ess
Road to the Airport Freeway and the future alignment could pass through
this lot. We understand that an alternate alignment has been proposed
which would shift Melbourne westward to line up with Blackfoot Trail south
of Bedford-Eu1ess Road within the City of Hurst. If this alignment is
approved, then only dedication along the west side of this lot adjacent to
Blackfoot Trail would be required for the future Melbourne Drive
alignment, as indicated above.
5 Metes and bounds calls on the lot lines of lot 6, block 1, should be made
to the new right of way lines on Blackfoot Trail and Melbourne Road and a
metes and bounds call should be noted on the new right-of-way line. Also,
the right-of-way line should be drawn with a heavier line weight to
distinguish it from the old right-of-way line.
.
1901 CEN'rRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
"
(
Subdivision Review Letter continued
(
,o'
CARDER ADDITION
',--
6 The 25-foot bUilding set back should be measured from the newly dedicated
rights-of-way of Blackfoot Trail and Bedford-Euless Road, rather than the
present rights-of-way.
7 We would remind you of our comments in the review letter dated July 2,
1985, PS 85-43, concerning prorata on existing sanitary sewer and water
lines.
8 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
,
-'- RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
'~
August 9, 1985
PS 85 - 60
PAGE
2
OweC D. Long and Associate{ Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
August 13, 1985
'-
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Carder Addition - Lot 6, Block
Final Plat - PS-85-60
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
'.";":'\'<.¿'. ~'.
.. .~
The 300-foot radius circle for fire hydrant coverage has been
· added to the water layout sheet.
The Owner is willing to reserve for future widening the total
"of nine additional feet for Blackfoot Trail but due to the exist-
ing lease agreement he does not want to dedicate the nine feet
until the City needs the additional right-of-way for widening
when, and if, it takes place.
3. Again, the Owner is willing to reserve the additional requested
right-of-way for future widening - 9 feet for Blackfoot Trail
and 12 feet for Bedford-Euless Road - until the City of North
Ri ch1 and Hill s and/or the adjoi ni ng city works out an agreement
for the proposed widening.
4. Engineer's statement of possible change in plans or realignment
which may require less right-of-way and which may be revised
even further in the future until some final engineering design
can be performed.
5. If the R.O.W. dedication were to take place today, or with
approval of this plat, then these revisions should be made.
6. The Owner would like to keep building lines as shown, tied to
the old R.O.W. rather than the proposed R.O.W. just in case the
additional R.O.W. is never needed.
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 I Hurst, Texas 76053 I Phone (817) 281-8121
,~"""",,..,.............,....<.- ";._""'..;..,.,..,.....',,~'...,:..~:~:.: ,.);.:c:-=.....~!i "''- .,..:¡;~:."..
.' .. . "
,'D'-'~. :...·'N'-~'>;___~'..,,·.~;.:....t.ír>;:~,',;.~-I~';...,,:)j··4:: (.'t:-:.<';tZ...- j; ",,".i"; -:...,J.;:~1':""'~~~~.:,.-,:~;,Z""~:,,,,.~,,,,
Mrs. Wanda calv~
-2-
c.
August 13. 1985
,'¡, .
'--
7. The Owner plans to use the existing water and sewer taps that
serve the property and does not feel the prorata should be
required.
8. The Owner is aware of the general reminder about City policies.
The Owner i.s wi 11 i ng to work wi th the Ci ty to do the best poss i b 1 e
planning for the City and this area. The major problem is that
this site is under a net ground lease and any early dedication
,right-of-way far in advance of when it is to actually be used will'
cause him a major monetary, loss. We are willing to make any addi
binding notes on the plat that the area reserved for street widening
will be dedicated at no cost to the City if you will allow the Owner
,to continue to use said area for the present time.·.",;~,,\'
If there are any additional questions, please give me a call.
. ere1y, n ~
en . n9, P~. {I.E.
Consulting Engineer .
.
-'"
ODl/ml
cc: B. R. Nowell
2215 Pipeline Rd. - Euless
~~
~
.
i"
..~".., ~""Æ"'~_)"'~~~~~~.h~_:'::~~;~:~;-; ./,>,' è ~:;:.,},;..
,. -<.-~.'! "...."" '-. ;. -', .-
.;.....i::.;:~~~~i.:~;;':~:: .;~,"-';', '1.:~...<,_;; L.,~,:;¡_..~,¥:...b~~,."".~
i
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
L.
Finance
Department:
Subject:
Public HearingoioQperating Budget
ì
¡
L
8/26/85
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Numbe~: GN 85-78
, ~
¡
L
The City Council at the last l'egulat;Ly scheduled Council meeting set August 26, 1985 as
the Public Hearing for the City of North Richland Hill's Operating Budget. Attached are
summaries for all operat1~g f1,U1dB as approved from tbè" Budget R.etreat held on July 27th
and 28th, 1985. .
Open public hearing onrthe/DQ.(t..tas submitted and allowal11nterested persons to be
heard for or against any1temttierein.
It is also recommended thåtSeptßd>er 9. 1985 Deestabltsheø. as the date for adøpting
the operating budget, granting()faddit1onal exemption amounts, and setting of the tax
rate for fiscal 1985/86.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
Operating Budget ---!-
Other p ,
~ /J1~1t -
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONJTEM
,
I
ì
L.
I
L
L
i
I
I-
í
L
L
Recommendation
r
i
I
L
I
L
L
L
¡
L
I
L
L
LL
L
'--
, Finance Director
Page 1 ~f
.. I
,
"-
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Calendar for Tax Year 1985
July 24, 1985 Chief Appraiser's Certifies Tax Roll
August 15, 1985 Publish Notice of Public Hearing on Operating Budget and
Revenue Sharing Budget
August 26, 1985 Public Hearing for Operating Budget -Separate Agenda Item
August 26, 1985 Public Hearing on Revenue Sharing Budget - Separate Agenda
Item
September 9, 1985 City Council to adopt new exemption rates for Over/65 and
Disabled Citizens at $25,000 each
September 9, 1985 City Council to set tax rate
September 9, 1985 City Council to adopt Operating Budget - Separate Agenda
Item
- '-^
September 9, 1985
City Council to adopt final Revenue Sharing Budget -
Separate Agenda Item
'--
City of J\9rth Richland Hills, Texas
,
',--
July 22, 1985
Honorable Mayor, City Council
City of North Richland Hills
North Richland Hills, Texas
In accordance with Texas Revised Civil Statutes, Article 689a-13 and City
Charter, the proposed budget and activity of service for fiscal year beginning
October 1, 1985 is herewithin submitted for your consideration and appropriate
action.
- '-
The budget document is the single most important report presented to the City
Council during the year and although it is primarily intended for City Council
policy determination, it also serves as an aid to the citizens in providing a
better understanding of the City's operating and fiscal programs. The proposed
budget document is the product of several months of effort involving all
Departments, City Management, Staff and City Council to provide the priority
needs of the City within certain revenue constraints.
GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS
The General Fund proposed revenues for the 1985-86 fiscal year totals
$8,855,286, an increase of 15.4% above the 1984-85 budgeted revenues. The
amount of revenue from various sources and the increases over last year are
shown as follows:
1984-85 1985-86 Percentage
Revenue Source Budget Proposed Increase (Decrease)
Taxes $6,105,517 $6,855,786 12.3
Fines & Forfeitures 187,100 199,000 6.4
Licenses & Permits 489,250 803,750 64.3
Charges for Service 169,000 184,350 9.1
Intergovernmental 711,000 772,400 8.6
Miscellaneous 12,000 40,000 33.3
Totals $7,673,867 $8,855,286 15.4%
~
(817) 281-0041/7301 N,E. LOOP 820/P,O, BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118
As indicated above the anticipated increases are due primarily to Taxes and
Licenses and Permits. The City is experiencing tremendous increases in growth
and the Ad Valorem Tax generated from new construction will be approximately
$297,500. Also included in the proposed budgeted revenues are the new fee
structures for building permits estimated to be approximately $230,000.
',--
The proposed Ad Valorem Tax Rate for fiscal year 1985/86, based on Certified Tax
Roll numbers supplied by Tarrant Appraisal District, is calculated to be 33.5¢
per $100 valuation. Which in affect lowers our present rate from 34.5¢ to 33.5¢
or a reduction of l¢. This assumes the same Homestead exemption of 10% or a
minimum of $5,000, an over-65 exemption of $25,000, disabled citizens of
$25,000, and the standard veterans exemptions as mandated by State Law, will be
granted for the proposed budget.
---
Proposed expenditures for the General Fund purposes totals $8,855,286, an
increase of 15.3% over 1984/85 fiscal year. Increases in levels of expenditures
by department over the preceding year are shown as follows:
Department
--''"-'
City Council
City Manager
City Secretary
Legal
Civil Service
Finance
Planning/Development
Municipal Court
Library
Public Works
Parks & Recreation
Police
Fire
Non-Departmental
Totals
i984-85
Budget
$ 48,760
157,782
89,878
24,000
69,296
854,315
314,197
99,265
279,807
1,259,037
411,514
2,333,700
1,510,077
228,239
$7,679,867
1985-86
Proposed
Percentage
Increase (Decrease)
$ 58,950
181,236
109,403
45,000
64,337
851,132
443,353
158,081
358,256
1,356,792
451,059
2,618,809
1,915,878
243,000
20.1
14.9
26.2
4.2
(7.2)
(0.04)
40.0
59.3
25.1
7.8
(1.4)
12.2
25.9
28.4
$8,855,286
15.3%
The proposed General Fund budget also allows for a Budget Reserve for
Contingency of $200,000 to be used at the discretion of the City Council for
unanticipated expenditures.
'--
--
The 1985/86 budget reflects staffing adjustments for several Departments, a
proposed pay adjustment for selected personnel, and a cost-of-living adjustment
of four percent.
Fire
Police
Park & Recreation
The increase in personnel is summarized as follows:
5 Firefighters
1 Clerk II
1 Animal Control Supervisor (Upgrade)
1 Animal Control Officer
1 Traffic Control Officer
1 Narcotics Detective
4 Maint. Workers (Part-Time Summer)
2 Park Maintenance Workers
4 Maint. Workers (Part-Time Summer)
1 Cable T.V. Transmitter (Part-Time)
1 Clerk II (Part-Time)
1 Clerk II
1 General Building Inspector
1 Code Enforcement Official
1 Assistant Director of Finance
1 Buyer/Expeditor-Purchasing
1 Part Time Tax Clerk
1 Micro Film & Record Retention Clerk
'--
Public Works
Library
Municipal Court
Planning/Development
Finance
City Secretary
UTILITY FUND
The proposed operating budget for fiscal year 1985/86 totals $9,110,042, an
increase of 21.2% above the adopted budget for fiscal year 1984/85. This budget
includes the following additional services not included in the budget for fiscal
year 1984/85.
-- .'"--
Public Works/Utility includes significant increases for payments
to Trinity River Authority and Fort Worth Water District for the
purchase of treated water.
Public Works/Utility also includes significant increases anticipated for
the treatment of wastewater to Trinity River Authority and Fort Worth sewer
treatment facilities. That increase is estimated to be in excess of
$600,000 over prior year's expenditures.
Public Works/Utility also includes the addition of equipment needed
to maintain the water distribution and sewer collector systems, and
training aids for maintenance personnel.
Utility/Finance: In an effort to improve the operations for utility
billing and service we are proposing an additional customer service
clerk and the implementation of hand-held metering devices and
associated equipment and programming fees.
The Utility Fund's proposed budget sets out an aggressive program of
services provided to the Citizens of North Richland Hills and Watauga
without an increase in water and sewer rates. However, funds are
allocated for a rate review to assure that net income for debt
coverage requirements for future revenue bond sales will remain
sufficient for those future sales.
The 4% cost-of-living adjustment proposed in the General Fund is also included
'- for employees in the Utility Fund.
REVENUE SHARING FUND
Total funding of Federal Revenue Sharing Funding at present levels is uncertain
at this time. We have anticipated a funding out of the program over a two year
plan. Therefore at this time we are proposing funding of $121,000 to be used
for the replacement of a modular ambulance for the Fire Department and the
replacement of the IBM System/34 for the Police Department.
DEBT SERVICE FUND
The expenditures for payment of principal, interest and agent's fees on the
City's outstanding debt for fiscal year 1985/86 amounts to $1,583,308. This
amount includes payments for the fire pumper truck and aerial ladder truck.
OVERALL SUMMARY
The fiscal year 1985/86 Proposed Budget sets out an aggressive program of
services for the citizens of North Richland Hills. We recognize that we have
much to accomplish next year. We stand ready to begin this next year with
energy and enthusiasm.
R;?~l1Y SUfi2 . .
iOd~e; N.~e ~
City Manager
-'~
--
~
t.!>
< ~ ,.... 0"1 ,.... 0"1 0 00 0
E-i C""I 00 N 0"1 I.t"I 0"1 0
ZOE-i . . .
,--, ~E-iO I.t"I N ...::t 0 0"1 ..c 0
~ E-i C""I C""I - 0
-
~
p..¡
I.t"I ..c N ...::t 00 - ..c
N 00 ..c 00 ,.... ...::t ,....
I.t"I I.t"I N I.t"I ..c 0"1 I.t"I
~ .. .. .. .. .. ..
M ...::t 00 C""I - ...::t ..c
E-i N ,.... ...::t I.t"I ,.... 00 I.t"I
0 0 I.t"I 00 - 00 C""I 00
E-i .. ..
,.... ..c C""I - 0"1
-
-flIT -flIT
~ 0 0 0 0 0
I.t"I I.t"I 0 0 0
- 0"1 ...::t 0 I.t"I
0 .. ..
Z H C""I ,.... 0"1 0
0 E-i ..c I.t"I C""I
H ~ -
~ -flIT
U
H p..¡
~
H
tI)
tI) ~t.!> 0 0
< ~~ 0 0
tI) ,...:¡ 0 0
,...:¡ U ~p::: ..
,...:¡ ..c :>~ - -
H~OO N N
::X:P::: I ~tI) - -
þl.t"l -flIT
fêE-iOO
HO"I
<~-
53~~ ~ 0 0 0 0
- o.ð 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
~ ~~~ ~ .. .. ..
,...:¡ p:::~þ-< ~~ N 0"1 C""I ...::t
~ - C""I I.t"I
~ Þ-<E-i p..¡,...:¡ -flIT
E-i ø:I~
p::: t.!>
OE-i§
Z~ 00 00
t.!>ø:I ~ ...::t ...::t
~§p::: U ,.... ,....
E-i H ..
ø:lO ~n~ I.t"I I.t"I
~t.!> ~ 00 00
~~ I.t"I I.t"I
HZ tI) .. ..
UH - -
~ -flIT
~
p..¡ ,.... 0 0 I.t"I 0 0 N
0 ~ ,.... I.t"I 0 0"1 C""I 0"1 ...::t
C""I 0 I.t"I 0'\ I.t"I I.t"I 0
~ H .. .. .. ..
,...:¡ 0 ...::t I.t"I ,.... 00 C""I 0
E-i H ...::t ...::t ...::t M ,.... ..c -
0 E-i - - N 0 0 ...::t -
E-i Þ ..
- I.t"I N 0"1
-flIT
00 ..c N 0'\ 0 - ..c
~ ...::t 00 ..c M 0 I.t"I 00
- C""I ,.... \0 0 C""I N
.. .. .. ..
~ C""I 00 C""I - 0 00 I.t"I
~ 00 - 0"1 I.t"I 0 0 I.t"I
00 ...::t I.t"I 0 N ,.... 00
t.!> ..
I.t"I - 00
-flIT -flIT
U)
CII
CJ
~
CII ~
CJ CII
r-f ~ tI) r-f
CII U) tU tU
-l ~ CII ~ r-f r-f 4-1
~ ~ CII tU :>. tU 0
0 r-f 4-1 .... .... 4-1 E-i
U) c:4 ~ CII 't:I ~
.... c:4 ~ ~ ~ c:4
CII ::I tU CII ::I tU
p..¡ tI) ~ t.!> tI) U
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TABLE 2
~
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
EXPENDITURES BY ACTIVITY & DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
PROJECTED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL PROPOSED
1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86
Mayor and Council $ 31,453 $ 32,974 $ 48,760 $ 48,760 $ 58,950
City Manager 157,059 146,270 157,782 162,629 181,236
City Secretary
Administration 97,824 30,013 64,265 64,645 79,704
Public Information 22,010 24,056 25,613 25,613 29,699
Sub-total $ 119,834 $ 54,069 $ 89,878 $ 90,258 $ 109,403
Legal $ 14,728 $ 22,798 $ 24,000 $ 25,000 $ 45,000
Civil Service 50, 171 58,233 69,296 65,765 64,337
Finance
Administration 148,117 227,092 235,029 248,505 251,841
Purchasing 61,951 191,620 273,482 269,260 268,112
Central Cashier 42,831 46,972 62,506 64,306 58,839
Tax 85,889 89,901 106,448 101,575 133,190
Building Maintenance -0- 119,664 170,850 168,855 139,150
Sub-total $ 338,788 $ 675,249 $ 848,315 $ 852,501 $ 851,132
- '-
Planning & Development
Mgmt & Technical Services $ -0- $ -0- 141,941 132,370 169,719
Building Inspections -0- -0- 172,256 142,123 273,634
Sub-total $ -0- $ -0- $ 314,197 $ 274,493 $ 443,353
Municipal Court $ 66,162 $ 91,993 $ 99,265 $ 98,577 $ 158,081
Library
Administration 27,327 28,475 30,436 32,077 56,067
Adult Services 19,502 20,093 21,732 21,732 24,606
Children's Services 19,664 20,604 19,579 19,579 22,025
Technical Services 172,512 162,983 160,684 160,684 186,237
Municipal Cable TV 12,911 22,519 23,674 23,673 42,284
Audio Visual -0- -0- 23,702 23,732 27,037
Sub-total $ 251,916 $ 254,674 $ 279,807 $ 281,477 $ 358,256
Public Works
Administration $ 73,759 $ 99,223 $ 104,751 $ 100,490 $ 113,123
Traffic Control 200,410 206,351 230,484 234,788 215,481
Service Center 83,649 78,425 89,948 91,160 95,911
Street & Drainage 604,149 634,478 833,854 741,700 932,277
Engineering 101,425 210,844 -0- -0- -0-
Building Maintenance 135,454 119,664 -0- -0- -0-
Sub-total $1,198,846 $1,348,985 $1,259,037 $1,168,138 $1,356,792
- ~j CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PROJECTED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL PROPOSED
1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86
Park & Recreation
Park Maintenance $ 110,671 $ 158,797 $ 369,968 $ 369,264 $ 400,646
Recreation 33,272 31,929 41,546 40,228 41,988
Senior Citizen Center -0- -0- -0- -0- 8,425
Sub-total $ 143,943 $ 190,726 $ 411,514 $ 409,492 $ 451,059
Police
Administration $ 89,256 $ 92,759 $ 96,988 $ 96,079 $ 92,477
Administrative Services 249,919 308,193 564,747 540,981 612,417
Criminal Investigation 223,528 277,287 310,889 309,852 364,002
Uniform Patrol 924,633 1,083,858 1,301,670 1,323,937 1,461,348
Animal Control -0- -0- 59,406 59,372 88,565
Sub-total $1,487,336 $1,762,097 $2,333,700 $2,330,221 $2,618,809
Fire Department
Administration $ 853,162 $ 953,431 $1 , 155,060 $1,150,598 $ 136,371
Suppression 105,601 119,009 164,510 144,089 1,441,430
Ambulance 167,067 168,621 190,507 193,633 211,219
Fire Inspection -0- -0- -0- -0- 35,651
Fire Investigation -0- -0- -0- -0- 91,207
Sub-total $1,125,830 $1,241,061 $1,510,077 $1,488,320 $1,915,878
Non-Departmental 271,487 164,775 234,239 209,934 243,000
Total General Fund $5,257,553 $6,043,904 $7,679,867 $7,505,566 $8,855,286
-1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
,...... ,......
~ ~, I' I' ~O N \0 -::t-::t0 Lf'I \00 ON 0\ 0\ 00 00 \0
CI) CI) ~ I' NO 0 0\ CO~O ("/") Lf'ILf'I OCO OCO 00 Lf'IO Lf'I
< < I
~ ~ I NOO("/")\o ("/") 0\ -::t 0 0\ O\N O~ 0\ ~ ON N I' I'
N ø:: ø::, ~ ......~ ~ ~ ("/")~ ("/") 0\ N ~ N
U U I
Z ~ ,
'-- H ~ I
...... I
\000-::t\O \0 000 0 0000000000 0
~OO~Lf'I CO 000 0 OOLf'lOOOOOOO Lf'I
\0 H OOLf'lCO-::t I' OLf'lLf'l 0 OONOLf'lLf'lOLf'lOO I'
CO ~ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
I C,!) \OLf'lr-.Lf'I~ Lf'I <""\ -::t ~ 0\ Lf'I-::t O-::tCOLf'lN -::to ("/")
Lf'I ~ CO\O-::tOLf'l Lf'I CO ~ 0\ -::t Lf'IO ~ \0 ~ 0
CO :::> ~ (,,/")N CO ~ ~ Lf'I~ CO
0\ :Q 0\ 0\
~ N ~<""\ \0
OOO~O ~ 000 0 0000000000 0
~ OOONO N 000 0 OOLf'lOOOOLf'lOO 0
~ Lf'I ,...:¡ OLf'l\O~Lf'I I' OO\Lf'I -::t NLf'lNOOLf'lOO\Lf'I("/") N
H CO < 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
U I :::> O-::tr-.\OO CO Lf'I("/") ~ 0 I' <""\ Lf'I Lf'I ~ Lf'I ~ ("/") 0\ N
~ -::t H N\O-::t("/")("/") 0\ \0 ~ CO N I' 0\ \0 CO
~ CO U 0\ ~ I' CO ~ ~ ("/") Lf'I
0 0\ < 0\ 0\
ø:: ~ ~ ~N Lf'I
p..¡
CI) -::t000("/") I' 000 0 0000000000 0
,...:¡ NOOOO\ I ~ 000 0 OOLf'lOOOOOOO Lf'I
,...:¡ Lf'I H -::tOLf'lOLf'l I Lf'I OLf'l\O ~ OONOOOOLf'lOLf'l N
H CO ~ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ I 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
:z: ~ I C,!) ~ONCO ("/") I Lf'I CO CO I' Lf'I ~ OLf'lN 0 NLf'lCO 0\
:::> -::t ~ O\Lf'I-::tCO ("/") I 0 I' CO N N I' Lf'I CO
~Z CO :::> CO 0\ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ("/") -::t
Z~ 0\ :Q 0\ I 0\
<:> ~ ~ ("/") I \0
,...:¡~ I
("/") :Z:..::
u
~H~ ~r-.CO~~ CO COLf'lO ("/") NNLf'lLf'I(,,/")OCO~CO-::t CO
,...:¡..::Z CON\O-::tO\ 0 ~\O CO O\\O\OCOLf'l-::tLf'lLf'lLf'lCO -::t
~ :::> -::t ,...:¡ Lf'I-::tCOOO\ 0\ ~("/") -::t ("/")O~-::t~~r-.("/")COLf'l 0\
~:Z:~ CO < 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
'-HH I :::> CO~\O OCO Lf'I CO 0\ I' \0 ~ NO ~("/") ("/") Lf'I 0\ ("/")
..::,...:¡ ("/") H Lf'I\O-::t ~O CO CO 0\ N -::tCO N 0\
0< CO u CO OLf'l -::t ~ ~ ("/") ~ Lf'I
Z..:: 0\ < 0\ 0\ 0\
~ ~ ~ ~N Lf'I
~Z
O~
C,!)
:>< CO 0\1'\0 ("/") I <""\ CO ("/")0 ~ Lf'I(,,/")Lf'I-::tO\OLf'l-::tr-.~ ("/")
H ("/")("/")1' CO 0 I -::t ("/")0 -::t ~r-.r-.~Lf'I\O-::t-::tON ~
H ("/") ,...:¡ r-.COLf'l(,,/") 0\ I -::t O-::t -::t O\-::t-::t~COCONCONCO CO
U CO < 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ I 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
I :::> O\O~Lf'I 0\ I -::t CO I' Lf'I I' N Lf'I~ 0\ I' N~~ 0
N H ~\OLf'I-::tr-. I Lf'I Lf'I \0 ~ I' Lf'I Lf'I N
COU N 0\ ("/") \0 ~ ~ N -::t
0\< 0\ I 0\
~ N N I Lf'I
I
CI)
~ CI)
..:: H
.µ :::> H
¡:: H ;:;::
CU H ø::
1-1 CI) ~ CI) ~
1-1 CU ~ .µ p..¡
::I CI) ¡:: ..:: .,..¡ CI)
U ~ 'M CI) 0 CI) S CU CU CI) o-ð
..:: ~ CU ~ H 1-1 CU CI) .µ
:::> CU H CU ~ ¡:: CI)""¡ CI) CI)
CI) H .µ ~ o-ð ;:;:: p..¡ CU .µ S .µ CU ,..... ~
CI) CU CI) H 1-1 ..:: ,..... CJ 'M 1-1 'M öO CU '" CI)
CU >< ~ ~ ::I CI) CI) ~ CI) 0 OM S CU S '" CI) ¡:: ~ Z
>< '" :>< ~ 0 CI) ::I ~ p..¡ ::I 1-1 ,...:¡ I-Ip..¡ 1-1 ¡:: ¡:: 0 CU ~
'" H CI) < ..:: u CU 0 Z 0 .µ CU CU.,..¡ CU 'M ¡:: U
H .µ CU H 0 CU CU H o-ð CU ¡:: CI) p..¡,..... p..¡ '" CJ .µ CU H
¡:: CU >< ~,..... ~ ¡:: ~ ¡:: 0 1-1 '" I-I.,..¡ CJ ..:: ,...:¡
:>'cu CI) '" ,...:¡ CIS CIS CI) '" U 0 öOCJ öO~ ,...:¡ CU
.µ ::I .,..¡ H < o-ð ø. :>.,..... ,...:¡ ~,..... .µ ¡:: 'M ¡:: ø. CU ,...:¡
1-1 C" ,..E:: H 'M I-I,..... < CI),..... ,..... .,..¡ .,..¡ I-I.,..¡o-ð ,..... CI) CI) <
U) CU ¡:: 1-1 CJ CI) 0 U) CJ '" CU H Z CU '" CJ "t:J.µ..o '" ¡:: ¡:: H
~ ø..,..¡ CU ¡:: CU H ~.,..¡ 1-1 CJ 0 ~ CJ S OM ,..... CJ S..o S .,..¡ CU 0
:>< Q"",, ,..E:: "',..... z ¡::..o CI) H U CI) 'M ,..... .,..¡ CU ::I I-I.,..¡ I CJ H
< 1-1 CU .µ 1-1 '" H ::I'M .,..¡ H""¡ ¡:: 0 ::I ,..... ,..... ::I ¡:: cu.,..¡
H p..¡~O~U) ~;:;::,...:¡;:;:: "":¡;:;::<CI) :Q~p..¡U<"::"":¡
- -
~~ 0'\ 0 MMO'\O'\ 0'\ M ...-t ...-to N -.::t MO Lf'I \0
U)U) 000 M...-tOO OM \0 Lf'IO M 00 MO ...... Lf'I
«
~~ 0'\ Lf'I 00 M 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ M M MO ...-t 0'\ MOO M -.::t
~ø::ø:: '-' ...-t ...-t ...-t ...-t M...-t N ...-t
Uu
Z~
',-- HQ
'-'
00000000 0 0000 I 0 00 0 \0
Lf'IOOOOOOO Lf'I 00 0 I 0 00 0 00
\OE-I O'\ONOO\O\OO M -.::to 0 I -.::t 00 0 N
OO~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I
I t..!J \0 0'\ ......NM\O\OM -.::t ......0 Lf'I I N Lf'I Lf'I 0 Lf'I
Lf'IQ N \0 MM 00 0 \0 I ...... ...-tN -.::t Lf'I
ooÞ ...-t Lf'I N I ...... 00
O'\~ I ..
...-t I 00
I
00000000 0 0000 0 00 0 ...-t
Q 00000000 0 0000 0 00 0 N
~Lf'I"":¡ Lf'IO\OOOOO\O ...... -.::to 00 -.::t OLf'l Lf'I 0'\
E-IOO< .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
U I Þ -.::tLf'l \O...-t\O\o\oN ...... \OOLf'lLf'l \0 00 0 Lf'I
~-.::tE-l N\O M<""'I ...... Lf'I M 0'\ ...-tN M \0
'JOOU ...-t -.::t N \0 Lf'I
00'\<
ø::...-t ......
p.,
U) 00000000 0 0000 0 00 0 ......
,...:¡ 00000000 0 0000 0 00 0 \0
,...:¡ Lf'IE-I OOOOOLf'lOLf'l 0 0000 0 00 0 00
H OO~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
::c ~ I t..!J 000 Lf'IOMLf'lLf'lN 0'\ \0 0 Lf'IO ...-t ON N M
Þ -.::tQ ...-t\O...-tMM \0 Lf'I Lf'I ...-t ...-t ...-t ......
Q Z ooÞ ...-t -.::t N ...... \0
Z ~ O'\~
< :> ...-t ......
,...:¡ ~
M ::c ø::
u
~ H Q 000 00 MO'\ 0 0...... Lf'I OOO'\...-t 0 OM M ......
,...:¡ ø:: z \OOOOO\Lf'lOO...-tO 0 OOMLf'I 0'\ \00 \0 0'\
Þ -.::t"":¡ \OLf'lMOM\OM-.::t -.::t OOON N Lf'I Lf'I 0 0
~~ rz. 00< .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
I Þ O'\MOOOO Lf'ILf'IM \0 \OO\ON -.::t -.::t 00 M ...-t
IX: ,...:¡ ME-I N\O...-tNM ...... Lf'I N 00 0'\ ...-t ...-t Lf'I
0< OOU ...-t -.::t M ...... ...-t M
Zø:: 0\< ..
~ ...-t ......
rz.Z
O~
(!)
>< 00 Lf'ILf'ILf'IO'\Lf'I......O'\ I M 0 00'\0 0'\ 0'\ Lf'I -.::t M
E-I -.::to'\\O\ONOOO'\ I ...-t OM...-t -.::t -.::tM 00 -.::t
H M"":¡ 00...... Lf'INNMLf'lN I 00 OOLf'l Lf'I \0 N 00 0'\
u 00< .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I .. .. .. .. .. ..
I Þ Lf'I......OOMO-.::t 0'\ I 0'\ 0\00\ Lf'I ...-t ...... 00 -.::t
NE-I ...-tLf'l MM I Lf'I Lf'I ...-t ...... MN Lf'I M
ooU I ...-t -.::t -.::t 00 ...-t ...-t -.::t
0'\< I
...-t I ......
I
U)
~
U
H ,...:¡
CI) :> ,..... <
.u ø:: CI E-I
CI) ..¡ ~ ¡:: Z
QI 0 U) 0 ~ >. U)
U) QI :l. '''; >. ~ .u Þ
~ rz. QI ø:: .u .u Z ..¡ 0
U ø:: 0 0 '''; ø:: QI ~ Q
H òO rz. ,...:¡ S ,..... >. ~ :l. Z Z
:> ¡:: .u CI) < 0 '''; ..¡ :> 0 < Þ
ø:: òO CI)"'; ¡:: (J U) E-I ..¡ .u CI QI 0 ..¡ ,...:¡ rz.
~ CI) ¡:: QI ¡:: QI '''; ~ Z p., Þ ..¡ S t..!J p., ,...:¡
U) QI"'; QlO't .u t..!J ~ ,.0 0 IX: U) ~ ,...:¡
QI,..... CI) rz.N"'; CI) ø:: ~ 0"; (J ~ Þ>. QI U <
ø:: rz.,..... QI (J"'; < Z ,...:¡ ¡:: H O.u S U) ø::
0 .,.;'t ¡:: c.ð (J .u ::c ø:: QI QI H Z ~.,.; 0 H ~
rz. QI ~ 0 0 < CI U ~ QI QI H ZU (J ~ Z
(J U .,.; òO .u :>rz. rz. .u < ¡:: ~
U) ¡:: QI .u¡::~U) ,...:¡ 0 QI CI) ,...:¡ ,...:¡~ H ,...:¡ t..!J
~ CI òOc.ð CI "'; 0 òO < (!) . ;:3 QI < ,...:¡ 0 <
~- t..!J,..... CI QI ¡:: ,..... ¡:: E-I IX: ¡:: ¡:: ¡:: ..¡ E-I ~ ..¡ E-I ,...:¡
ø:: ;:3,.0 CI) ..¡ ¡:: QI CI .,.; 0 ~.,.; 0"; QI QI 0 U QI QI 0 <
<,.0 ..¡ :l.(JCI ,..... .u ~ E-I E-I S S :> .u E-I U),..... ,¡:: E-I E-I
::c S CI CI QI,..... CI "'; 0 Z't 't QI ¡:: HCI .u 0
U<t..!J~ø::p.,U):>~ H«ø:: H ~U)O E-I
TABLE 4
'--
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
UTILITY FUND
BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED PROPOSED
1983-84 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86
Public Works - Utilities
Water Distribution $3,792,323 $3,650,280 $4,758,788 $4,825,726 $5,498,470
Sewer 2,089,614 1,684,989 2,314,519 2,236,562 2,996,152
Water Service -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
Planning/Development 103,755 89,310 108,850 117,324 176,360
Total Public Works $5,985,692 $5,424,579 $7,182,157 $7,179,612 $8,670,982
Finance - Utilities
Water Billing $ 133,781 $ 129,777 $ 157,314 $ 154,486 $ 230,812
Water Service 121,636 111,576 176,530 182,152 208,248
Total Finance Utility $ 255,417 $ 241,353 $ 333,844 $ 336,638 $ 439,060
Non-Departmental $ 34,891 $ 34,891 $ -0- $ -0- $ -0-
Total Utility Fund $6,276,000 $5,700,823 $7,516,001 $7,516,250 $9,110,042
- ~j
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
""'
~ ~ 0'\ 0'\ O'\MO'\OO 0'\ O'\\OMO'\O M 00 0 -::I"
tf.I tf.I 00 OMOOOO ~ O~~OO 00 ON 0 ~
< <
~ ~ 0'\ 0'\ O'\MOOOO 0'\ O'\O'\M 0'\ 0 00 00 N 0'\
~ p::: p::: M N N O~ ~
I".) I".) ~
Z ~
'-- H ¡:::¡
'-'
0000000 0 00000 0 00 I 0 0
0Ll'\0000 Ll'\ 00000 0 00 I 0 Ll'\
\0 H ONLl'\OOO r-. 0000Ll'\ Ll'\ 00 I 0 N
00 ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Ll'\ .. I
I 0 0-::1" OMLl'\Ll'\ r-. 0-::1"0 -::I" r-. Ll'\ Ll'\ I 0 M
Ll'\ ¡:::¡ r-.r-. r-. -::I" -::I" 0 00 \0 \0 -::I" Ll'\ -::I" I Ll'\ ~
00 þ ~ ~ Ll'\ 0 ..-I M N I N ~
0'\ p:¡ I
..-I Ll'\ Ll'\ M M I 0'\
I
0000000 0 0Ll'\000 Ll'\ 00 I 0 Ll'\
¡:::¡ 000000 0 OMOOO M 0 I 0 M
~ Ll'\ ,...:¡ 0Ll'\0000 Ll'\ 0..-1000 ..-I 0 I 0 \0
H 00 < .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I
I".) I Þ Or-. Ll'\N~\O ..-I 000 Ll'\ 0\0 0'\ 0 I 0 0
~ -::I" H 0\0 Ll'\ -::I"M 0 OLl'\Ll'\-::I" Ll'\ N I N 00
...., 00 I".) r-. ~ 0 00 ..-I 0 N I N N
0 0'\ < I
~ ..-I -::I" Ll'\ N M I 00
p.., I
tf.I ..-1000000 ~ 00000 0 00 I 0 ..-I
,...:¡ 000000 0 00000 0 0 I 0 0
,...:¡ Ll'\ H 000000 0 00000 0 0 I 0 0
Htf.I 00 ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I
::t:r,.;¡ I 0 0Ll'\0~Ll'\ 0 ~ MO 0 Ll'\Ll'\ M 0 I 0 -::I"
Þ -::I" ¡:::¡ O\OLrI -::I" 0 \0 0'\ \0 N N-::I" -::I" 0 I 0 0
¡:::¡Z 00 Þ ~ ..-I ..-I -::I" Ll'\ ~ 00 N I N Ll'\
Z~ 0'\ p:¡ I
<> ..-I -::I" -::I" N N I r-.
,...:¡~ I
Ll'\ ::t:p:::
I".) ""'
~H¡:::¡ \ONON~ 000 LrI NLl'\Ll'\LrlM 0 0-::1" I -::I" 0'\
"":¡P:::Z r-.LrI..-IM\O r-. -::I" MNOOr-.O N ~ I ~ r-.
-q Þ -::I" ,...:¡ M~OM~ M r-. O~OOMr-. ~ LrI I Ll'\ M
:::t: ~ 00 < .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I
'-c:""I H I Þ O-::l"-::I"-::I"Mr-. -::I" LrI M 0'\ 00 r-. -::I" \0 I \0 LrI
P::::>< M H O\O..-I..-I~\O -::I" \0 ..-I M-::I"-::I" ~ M I M 0'\
OH 00 I".) -::I" N'-'~ 00 Ll'\ ..-I ~ 0'\ -::I" I -::I" ..-I
ZH 0'\ < I
,...:¡ ~ -::I" -::I" N N I 00
~ H I
0 H
Þ
:>< r-.N Ll'\0'\..-I \00 0 Ll'\..-I..-I-::I"N M 0 N I N LrI
H 00'\ NO'\N 00 M r-.NO'\-::I"Ll'\ 00 0'\ I 0'\ 0
H M ,...:¡ r-.Ll'\MMLl'\O'\ LrI Ll'\M~MN \0 M I M \0
I".) 00< .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I
I Þ 0-::1" 00\0\0 N 0'\ 00 r-. -::1"0'\0'\ 00 ..-I I ~ 0'\
NH r-.\OOO -::I"Ll'\ N r-.oo MM-::I" 00 ..-I I ~ N
001".) Ll'\ ..-I 0'\ N ..-I LrI -::I" I -::I" 0'\
0'\< I
.... M M N N I \0
I
,... >.
s= QJ .µ
,... 0 ) ,...
QJ 0.-1 QJ QJ ¡:::¡
.µ .µ tf.I ~ Z
tIS tIS I 0 Þ
CIJ ~ .µ CIJ ,... QJ ~
QJ ,... I ,... QJ ,... p.., 13
0() QJ QJ CIJ ,... o QJ QJ ,... 0 ,... :><
,... QJ .µ QJ ::s QJ ~~ ) QJ >. U QJ H
CIJ tIS 13 tIS ~ 0 .µ to CIJ QJ ) .µ s= ..r::: H
QJ ..r::: CIJ 0 ~ QJ tIS QJ CIJ s= CIJ tf.I QJ or-! H .µ ,...:¡
..-I I".) ~ U ,... s= ~ ..-I ~tIS ,... tf.I I".) 0 H
tIS tIS s= tIS QJ tIS tIS tIS ,... QJ tIS .µ H
tf.I QJ H H .µ ~..-I ..-I tf.I HH ~.µ ..-I 4..¡ CIJ ..-I Þ
U tIS 0..-1 tIS o tIS tIS 0 QJ tIS
'- ,... ,.-I ,... ,... P::: ..-I QJ .µ ,... ,... ,.....-1 P::: .µ ,... .µ ,...:¡
QJ I> QJ QJ I QJ U 0 QJ QJ QJ QJ I 0 QJ QJ 0 <
.µ ,... .µ..r:::0I>CIJ H ) ) ) I> ° H ..-I .µ H H
tIS QJ tIS'µ""QJor-! QJ QJ QJ QJ ,... tIS s= 0
~ tf.I ~Op..,¡:::¡):: tf.Itf.I tf.I¡:::¡p.., tf.I H H
TABLE 6
"--
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT
PARKS, LIBRARY & PROMOTIONAL FUNDS
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED PROPOSED
1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86
Park & Library Fund
Park $ 9,592 $16,420 $25,000 $24,650 $27,000
Library 32,226 24,422 25,000 24,650 27,000
Total Expenditures $41,818 $40,842 $50,000 $49,300 $54,000
Hotel/Motel Occupancy
Tax Fund
èromotional
$32,950
$40,306
$156,500
$132,928
$130,500
Revenue Sharing
Capital Expenditures
$320,000
$343,789
$121,000
~l
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
',,--
Occupancy Tax Fund
Proceeds
Park & Library Donations
Contributions
.'--.-Revenue Sharing Fund
Revenue Sharing
Entitlement EP-17
-1
ACTUAL
1982-83
$ 67,299
$ 44,352
$224,865
TABLE 7
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
REVENUES
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985-86
ACTUAL
1983-84
BUDGET
1984-85
$ 63,918
$ 60,000
$ 46,220
$ 50,000
$244,844
$245,000
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PROJECTED
ACTUAL
1984-85
$ 67,500
$ 49,300
$235,018
PROPOSED
1985-86
$ 78,000'
$ 54,000
$124,382
TABLE 8
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
SUMMARY OF AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985-86
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED PROJECTED
1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1984-85 1985-86
Taxes Levied
-
Original Levy $ 3,721,975 $ 3,452,788 $ 3,488,577 $ 3,573,373 $ 3,837,873
Current
Collections 3,651,680 3,403,989 3,431,705 3,484,039 3,722,737
Delinquent $ 70,295 $ 48,799 $ 56,872 $ 89,334 $ 115, 136
Tax Collections
Current $ 3,651,680 $ 3,403,989 $ 3,431,705 $ 3,484,039 $ 3,837,873
Delinquent 86,476 61,427 47,067 48,813 65,000
Int. & Penalty 51,577 46,868 26,704 30,124 47,500
Total
Collections $ 3,789,733 $ 3,512,284 $ 3,505,476 $ 3,562,976 $ 3,950,373
Net Taxable Valuation
- ~
Real Property $593,189,950 $620,006,241 $ 931,318,658 $ 956,061,089 $1,045,957,057
Personal
Property 59,788,103 70,551,270 79,863,200 79,699,307 99,676,628
Total $652,978,053 $690,557,511 $1,011,181,858 $1,035,760,396 $1,145,633,685
Tax Rate Per $100 Valuation
General Fund $0.35 $0.28 $0.1974 $0.1974 $.197
Debt Service 0.22 0.22 0.1476 0.1476 .138
Total $0.57 $0.50 $0.345 $0.345 $0.335
Current
Delinquency 1.9% 1.4% 1.6% 2.5% 3%
~j
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~I
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Finance
Department:
,'t
, Subject:
Public Hearing;'R:evenue Sharing Budget
8/26/85
Agenda Number: GN 85-79
¡
L
 budgét hearing on Revenue.ShartngEut1tlements was advertised to be held on August 26,
1985 for all interested' citizens of the City of North Richland ªills. The proposed budget
is summarized as follows:
Recommendation
Conduct Public Hearing on propose4 tevénue Sharing Budget8J\l request citizen input. It
is recommended that September 9,. 1985, 'be the date for finalÞucl'get adoption for fiscal
year 1985/86 Revenue Sharing Budget.,
L
L
1. Replacement of'l'mance's
Department Computer System
2. Purchase'o,f Modu,lar , Atnbulance
Unit and a).l'å..oc.iat'êd
equipment for the 1.1:reDepartment
I
I
L
r
L
L
L
¡
I
L
L
L
L
l
I
L-
. Finance Review
'--- Acct. Number N/A
ods Available
l
L~
L
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,) _
Operating Budget _
Other - ~ '7i1~.,.~~
Depa.rtment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
'--f.',';;:'
,,- ;~/:~:";~r~~~:,,\.:,, >.
,"_'::~ '~>"-'.\"_f<'
"*.;";.,.,__1
Page 101
1..
L
I
¡
L
L
L
L
lr-
í
I
~
l
!
~
~
i
1
~
1
~
CITY OF
>NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Council Meeting Date: 8-26-85
Agenda Number: GN 85-80
Department:
...
SUbject:
Dr. Graham's Reques t ' for,.á Second Driveway Opening .
on Davis Blvd.
As you can see from Dr. Graham.' 8' letter t he is requesting to put in a circular
driveway which would necessitate another driveway opening on Davis Blvd.
Dr. Graham has purchased one. of the single family h01nf!s on the west side of
Davis and north of the Davis Blvd. Church which is approxiinatelya 75' wide
lot. In the remodelingprocéss Dr. Graham is opening up'a drive thru to tàe
backyard and is putting parking for patients in the'rear of the building.
Since the lot is so narrow if' lit circular driveway was placed . in, front of the
building and one car parked·there,it'would block anyone· else from going thru
the circular driveway as Dr. Graham Jias suggested.
Anyone pulling up in front of ~the'buÚ,ding could back up into the driveway
going into the rear yard and would not have to back out onto Davis Blvd.
. and I feel like this would be the' traffic pattern in front of this'office.
There are about six lots along Davis Blvd. at this location that are approximately
70' wide and if all six oftbose 10t iJ have double driveways then you can see
that we would create several unnecessary points of conflict.
All openings along thoroughfa.l'etypestreets are potential points of conflict
for automobile traffic and more accidents occur. As the City grows, Davis
carries more and moretr:affic and traffic hazards need to be eliminated as
much as possible.
Recommendation: The staff reco~endà ~o deny the request of Dr. Graham for
a second driveway opening onto Davis Blvd. at the ,1ocatiol1 of his new
medical office.
Finance Review
Acct. Number (
Sufficient Funds AVáilable
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,) _
Operating Budget _ ,
~her ~_ .~k- fJ!rL~
DepaRment Head Signat~re. City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of 1
í
~I
::;-,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
, Ðépartment:
Admimlstratiot1
Council Meeting Date: 8/26/85
Agenda Number: GN 85-81
SUbject:
':>.',', -'., : . ",'"
Re~olution l'tp.S,S-U~.. '4pþt-Qvin¡ Issuance of
Industrial Development'RéVenue Bonds forM& H
Realty Company
I
L
I
¡
L
,
,
I
L
The Industrial Developme~t,CÞmmitteè_t on August 20, 1985 and approved the issuance of
Industrial Development~ônds eM &H:Q,ealty).
I
¡
L
L
I
L
I
i
L
¡
44
¡
,
L
!
I
L
L
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
Op'&ratlng Budget
, Other
N/A
Finance Review
Acct.Number NJ A
Sufficient Funds Available
ff//4f:A
City Manager
, Finance Director
f
i
¡
~
\ Department Head Signature
, CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
1
RESOLUTION NO. 85-18
--
A RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE BY NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF AN ISSUE OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS
(M & H REALTY COMPANY PROJECT) SERIES 1985; APPROVING
THE RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUER AUTHORIZING THE BONDS,
THE ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS AUTHORIZED THEREBY AND THE
PLAN OF FINANCING APPROVED THEREBY AND THE BOND
DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills (the "Unit") has approved
and authorized the creation of North Richland Hills Industrial Development
Corporation (the "Issuer") as a Texas nonprofit corporation, pursuant to the
development Corporation Act of 1979, as amended, Article 5190.6 Vernon's
Annotated Texas Civil Statutes (the "Act"), to act on behalf of the Unit to
promote and develop industrial and manufacturing enterprises; and
WHEREAS, the Issuer is authorized by the Act to issue its revenue
bonds on behalf of the Unit for the purpose of paying all or part of the costs
of a "project", as defined in the Act, and to loan the proceeds thereof to
finance all or part of the costs thereof; and
'--
WHEREAS, the Issuer, by resolution (the "Bond Resolution") adopted
August 20, 1985, has authorized the issuance and sale of its Industrial
Development Revenue Bonds (M & H Realty Company Project) Series 1985 (the
"Bonds"), in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $2,500,000, and by
the Bond Resolution has also authorized a Loan Agreement with M & H Realty
Company (the "Company") wherein the Issuer agrees to issue and sell the
Bonds to provide funds to finance a certain project of the Company (the
"Project") located within the Unit, and certain other agreements of the Issuer
in connection therewith (collectively, the Loan Agreement and such other
agreements shall be referred to as the "Bond Documents"); and
WHEREAS, the Act requires that the governing body of the Unit
approve, by written resolution, any agreement to issue bonds approved by
the Issuer; and
WHEREAS, Section 103 (k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as
amended requires the Unit's approval of the issuance of the Bonds and
authorizes its approval of a plan of financing additional facilities related to
the Project after a public hearing following reasonable public notice; and
WHEREAS, the Issuer conducted such a public hearing on August 20,
1985, following publication of notice thereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Bond Resolution and the
minutes relative thereto and, by adoption of this Resolution, intends to
approve the Bond Resolution, the issuance of the Bonds, the plan of
financing approved by the Bond Resolution and the Bond Documents and to
make the findings required by the Act to approve the Project;
''-...
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
Section 1. The Unit, acting by and through this City Council, hereby
approves:
(a) the Bond Resolution and the plan of financing approved thereby;
(b) the issuance of the Bonds in the amount and for the purposes
referred to in the preambles hereof and as described in the Bond
Documents; and
(c) the Bond Documents, copies of which are on file among the records
of this meeting.
Section 2. The Unit, acting by and through this City Council, hereby
assigns to the Issuer that amount of the state private activity bond ceiling,
available to bond issuing authorities in the State of Texas under Section
103(n) of the Code, that is allocated to the Unit with respect to the Bonds
pursuant to Executive Order MW-27B, (Executive Department, Office of the
Governor, March 8, 1985) or pursuant to state law, as applicable.
Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after
its adoption.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1985.
,--.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
¡
}
L
L..
(
i
L
I
L
í
,
L
!
\
L
¡
L
L..
r
L
¡ ,
L
L
I
L
r
,
L
I
I
L
¡
L
L
f
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Personnel
Council Meeting Date: 8/26/85
Subject: Self-insuring the City's Worker's Compensation program. Agenda Number: PU 85-24 '
As a member of the Teps Municí.palLeague's JOintWorke1;"'Collq)ensation Fund,
the City's cost forWorke1;"sC<>apensation Insurane~ln198S186 will be $170.000.
With the success ofou1;' sel:€-inøred health progrø,it.wa, felt that a similar
program could substant.í.ally reaUeethe City's cost forWorker's Compensation.
An "Administrative Sønices Only"(ASO) contract was put out. ~o bid for an
administrator of a sel£"'insuredW,orker's Compen$8tionprogr_~ Three bids were
received from ESIS, DC ,Dallas;_rican Home InsUranceCQlltP8ny , Dallas; and
Alexis Risk Manag~ttDal1as. Of the three, Alexis'bldwas the only
proposal received th.t lncludeds~cif:tc Stop,.Loss insurance,which is most
critical to the Clty£or sel£-¡i~ringany program. The ~l fixed cost of
the Alexis plan is $UJ,822.1!h.is,eovers a $150,000 sþecificSt.op-Loss plus
Alexis' Service Fee foradlU, , ing our program. Ina.dd~t.ion. to the $18,822,
the City's total cos:t,.for19ª, .' 'will be determined by claims paid. It is
estimated that the 198.5/86 e1\JUJa ,.will be $40.000, which ià a liberal estimate.
Total projected cost. for Worker's·Compensation.in1985186'Wit.h t.he Alexis plan
is $58,822. The est:i1lated cost savings for 1985/86 would be about $100,000.
Alexis has an excellentrecor4o:f administ.ering self-lnsuredWorker's Compensation
programs in Téxas...AmØng..theirclients is the WesternCom~nYt Fort Worth; ARA
Living Centers. Hôust:con;Btowning-Ferris Indu:stries,Ho~t.on;and Dart Container
Corp., Waxahachie. T!1eCity'..¡initial cost to illq)lementA1.exis' plan would be
the $18,822 in fixed cost plus a $10,000 reserve deposited in Alexis' bank from
which claims would be paid. ~City would be required t,òmaintain the $10.000
balance by depositing' an amoUnt equal to the claims paid each month.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
(1) Authorize the City' swithdrawal from the Texas Municipal League I s Joint
Worker's Compensation fund effective October 1. 1985'.
(2) Award a two-year Profeàsional Services Contract t.o Alexis Risk Manage-
ment, effective October 1, 1985 as the Admini.strator of the City's
self-insured Worker's Compensation program.
Finance Re¥iew
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.) _
Operating Budget -Ã-
Other _,
~~aArgnajure
'C(TY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number. ~p_ft.menta1ized in account 111190
Sufficie ,unds AvåUable '
_",..~V ''', '
. Finance Director
"':-'>'d
1
Pagé 1 of
¡
L
L
r
L
r
L
L
(
I
¡
L
I
L
r
I
L-
¡
I
L
1
i
ì
I
L
¡
I
L
I
L
¡
i
L
í
L
~
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance . . . ....'
Lease/Purchase Fina~cing -
Fire Department E..uipunt
I
At the Augus t 12, 1985\ÇityC0\1ucilmeet ing the fiu..t1c:tø.g.. proposal was awarded to Firs t
Continental Financial~ørJ)oration for the lease/pur.el1aseofthe.Fire Department pumper
engine and aerial ladd~l'truck.in the amount of$50~.OOO.. First Continental Financial
Corporation was the lo'W percentage bidder (6.89%)with.payments in amount of $9.875.00
per month.
Council Meeting Date: 8/26/85
Subject:
Agenda Number: PU 85-25
Pursuant to that award,>amee.tin~?".1I held on August~2.198.5with First Continental
Financial Corporation .<Ms. Barb4l".Carlson, Marke.tU111«1:presen.tative, and Mr. Phil
Rector, Legal CouncilfC).r the~~),to discuss the·finaø.cj.å.!contract and the
amortization schedule c.oncernil't8' the monthly payment .UpønT~View of the proposed
cont.ract it was discovel'edthattbe.payment amounts Wer~ch~ed to $10,124.00 monthly
with an, interest rate of> 8.24%..<. Ms. Carlson and Mr., _..etor tiereadvised of the
discrepancies and the contract tl'as not acceptable. 'Th~liinfg1'D1ecime that a mistake had
been made on their initiæil prof"8.al! The correct amountIiF.h9.uJ.dhave been the amounts
indicated in the propo.ed contrae~.. The original amountlJ~9.'tldhave placed them in a
loss position becausetbe fi1U1l\ei....1..placement fee percent~leWasnot built into the
original proposal. First Cont1.ne"~~l Financial Corpol"at19."<.1.~unwilling to enter into
contract per the original quot~s,al\cJwanted to negotiatethe.&1IIounts. They were again
advised that was not acceptab.1.'e.aucithe City's position 'Was to. reject their alternate
proposal.
Mr. Ed Esquivel, partt1erwi.thD'C1~S,Huguenin, BoodunaIî, ~ci.M<>rrow, was contacted and
informed .about the disc1."epancies ~dasked what the City's>aJ.ternatives were. Mr.
Esquivel informed metb~ttheCity could legally hold First OOntinental Financial
Corporation responsible for the 01"1ginal bid. However, that process could take between
18 to 24 months to reach asettlêmeu.t. In the mean t~.we.are setting out there with a
new fire station with noeq'U1pment.
Mr! Esquivel's recommendatiot11.åtoreject the originalcønt~act award and to approach
the next lowest bidder todetel"..ine if the originalþid-.o\1û,t· is still acceptable. If
it is. then award the contract to that f'Unding co't"pora.t"Qn. If not, reject all bids,
readvertise, and startbidd:f.n.gproces. over again.
The second lowest bidder,~ieh isno'Wthe lowest quali!i~d..bidder. is First Union
teasing Group with payulentaJa .0\U1ts>of$10,080.86 monthly, and an interest rate of 7.76%.
Mr. Hall Barnett, Munie:J.pal.Le."~>4$sociate for FirstUni01.\L~asing Group, was contacted
concerning the orginalproposal.tød~termine if the amo\U1ts 'Wer~ still acceptable. Mr.
Barnett has agreed totheQri~±n.lte.rms and has agreed to send a transmittal letter by
courier to confirm that original proposal.
Recommendation:
It is the recommendation that the orl.'ginalcontractawatdandOrdinance No. 1269 be
amended, and Ordinance!fo.>12}3J;>e approved awarding the bid to First Union Leasing in
the amount of $10,080..86< at an !nterest rate of 7..76%.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,) _
Operating Budget _
Other Þ. Debl~"~.C... e
. ~ "'-¡JJ~,..<.~.......~..~
Department Heað.Signatu',ê
CITVCQUNCIL .ACTION/TEM
Acct. Number U-Oo-Oo-$3,S5
S~ndS AveJ able . '""-~
¡¿~
City Manager
& 12-00-00-5555
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
ORDINANCE NO. 1273
WHEREAS, the City Council has received sealed bids for the sale and
purchase of a Fire Pumper Truck and Aerial Ladder Truck, for use by the City
Fire Department, by using a Lease-Purchase Contract; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing all sealed bids the City Council finds that
the First Union Leasing Group is the lowest responsible bidder and in fact is
the lowest bidder with an APR of 7.76% over a five year period with 60 monthly
payments of $10,080.86.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
accepted.
The attached bid of First Union Leasing Group be and is hereby
2.
This Ordinance shall constitute evidence of indebtedness of the City
for payment of the obligations imposed by acceptance of the low bid for
financing said Fire Department Equipment. The obligation is secured by the
City's pledge of future Ad Valorem Property Tax sufficient to meet the
obligation and said obligation shall not be payable from revenues budgeted for
current maintenance and operating expenses and shall be payable solely from
Property Ad Valorem Tax Revenues necessary to discharge this obligation be,
and are hereby, appropriated for payment of said obligation.
3.
The first monthly payment shall be made on October 1, 1985.
--~~-
PASSED ~__~_PROVE~ _tÈis~6t_~_~.Y-º.f_Augt!$~1-19~_ _______
~--------~._--------
-~- ----
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
I
L
Council Meeting Date:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
L
¡'
L
. Department:
8-26-85
Subject: Payment of Arch:1.te<:tural Fees to Komatsu andAssòc~atesAgenda Number: PAY 85-40
for Public Works Service Center
These architectural fees are for the·Public Works SerViçe Center.
amount earned is $35,696.13 of whi~h$16,658.20 has been paid.
,
The total
í
L
Recommendation: The staffrecO'Øll11ends to pay KotD.atsuandÂ$8'oc~ates $19,073.ll.
I
L
I
I
L-
!
L
L
L
I
I
L
f
I
i
L
f
¡
L
L
L
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
Operating Budget
Other
09-60-00,...4200
Avaltable
f
L
-
Operat g 'l'ra
~ Q~"
Department Head 8ig~atu... · ' \
.. . CiTY OOUNCIL ACTIOJillTfM
A/YtJl.
,City Manager
Page 1 of I
. Finance Director
KOMATSU
ALBERT S. KOMATSU'" ASSOCIATES, INC.
Fi 1 (::!!:
J C)B . 1\10. :I. :332
l=i\.l.(]U':3t :1.4, 1.':;;85
M~. Dennis Horvath
Assistant City Manage~
City of North Richland Hills
F. O. Be:-: 18<::)09
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
Re: Public Works Service Center
(~~;!< ,} (::¡/::¡ Nc). :I. 332
r-· <:\<,;" (:: :I.
C:F3.1. ~;85
STATEMENT for Architectural and Engineering Services
___~.___..__._.M._W.NM.___.______.__"_.____.___...__..._.________.._..,...,__.____..u._____.__....."._____M__.____._____.~
_____.____.___.__._...._.______._.,.__._.__.,___._.........__._.____.___.....____.___._....___.___.N.__.________.~_______
Fe(~ (:('fiClunt:
Estimated Construction Cost $744,212.00
Fee = 7% ~()7 X $ 74L~212u()O - $52~094~84
Credit from Master Plan Study
50% of $12,000.00 = $6000.00
Three Quarter p~o~ate this facility $4,500.00
.._ ..... __ .__ _.. .._ _ R_ _R _. ~
Tot,:::\:t Fe£.;:
1; ii· 7' ;. 5 r..¡ .i~. " ~::3 ij.
E;chE::mat.:l C:S,¡
Ff!:!¡:~ Eii.\(·l'1ed
:l.OO'.~~
Cump], (;?te
1. ~5;r (:¡()~~~
,..
4'l'5S!4" 8/.1·
x
..-
Design Development
F E!E~ Ei.'lnì E~d -.
100~':: Compl(f:te
20.00:'.: X
4T5C14.84
.-.
Cont~act Documents
1 OO~~: Comp], \:~tf.."
4 (I" (H)'% )(
--
F:" ':::~ f':'~ I:: ,::'~ (' n F:~ d
;:¡'7::j9i~" f:34
.-
;:;iu.b t: Dt. ¿.~ 1
Less Paid to Date (Fee Only)
(."ïnD1...i.n t, o·f F ":::'0.~ Du. E?
FÚ;' i i1I L:n,\ i~ \:: :i. b 1 ~,~ s
¡':jì"'DUhIT I\!Ov.J DUE
F €~\.::~ (.':¡mDunt !.>'Ú 11 b0..~ <::\c:ij u",t.ed to Fi n iEt], C,]I"', ::itr·"I...\C t i Dn C>:!:st
,t:hj ./CJr'j
ARCHITECTS· ENGINEERS' INTERIOR DESIGNERS
P.O. BOX 2079
FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76113 ' 817/332-1914' METRO 429-7463
-¡i.7!, :1.:3 ':1 . :2 :::;;
~;(:>j, 5 L ~3 -, <'::):7
~f.: :I. ':i " (ì :.~~ '7 II C;} ..::t,
__ _,., ._.. _ ...,. ..._ ..... ._. ~._ __ "ft'
'$ :~:; ~5;! {;~ \i ~.).. t ~5
:i~ J ¿~ :' ;:~~ ~:,:"; ~3 >I :';;':: ()
..............._..,·...··_··..·....___R...··_
1~ :I. C? ~1 r) ::. '7 II ':7' ~~;
.;.. ":I':~:" i ,-'!
:P'..)...] ø J. C
.... -.- .- ..... .-- ..... ..- - ~... ..- .....
.,þ 1 f? n C '7::::; ~ J 1
.."-.._.-.-~.'-_.--.-~~--. .--.--
_....._,.._,..~._- -~ ..-- ......-...-
~-, Albert S. Komatsu
Associates
Architects + Engineers
Charge To
.
$ ¿s~(".
Office Use
..
Remarks '
Date <:3 ~
Project No.
Requested By:
Cot) ~c IL
¡&t:J/Z,'
tE'vll::?.oJ. ;ð LJ 0 .4
o t?:. -
77:J
/0,
(
J
Total No, of ORIGINALS
Total No, of Prints EACH
REPRODUCTION ORDER
(
L-~
Size of Prints·
7730 x 42) 24 x 36 I
J
I--- 8Vz x 11 Spec la I Size
I
'-
. .
Type of Reproduction
)
)
Xerox . (i~luelln~
J
BLACK LINE Paper Sepia
Mylar Sepia $tlck·On
I
....
,
L
)ert S. Komatsu
,ociates
:tiitects + Engineers
hsuge To
ffiee Use
f ~~~~ectto~ 13~:; ]
Requested By:
Remarks
(
]
al No. of ORIGINALS
~al No. of Prints EACH
REPRODUCTION ORDER
(
]
Size of Prints·
_ ,x~ ~x~
~
Special Size
'--
Type of Reproduction
. .
r'T xerõi ") Bluellne
. 1/
BLACK LINE Paper Sepia ,
J
Mylar Sepia $tlck-On
....,
~'.
;;:::"3
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Police
COuncil Meeting Date: 8-26-85
I
L
"\- ",,' .", ',:'>
Payment to Komatsu and <Associates for Architectural
Fees for the Animal Control.Center
- . - >-
Agenda Number: PAY 85-41
¡
L
This is a partial paymeIJt for arch1tëctural fees for thean1ma1 control center.
The total fee earned todate is $13,329.25 of which $6.220.32 has already been
paid.
I Recommendation: The ståff<recommends to pay Komatsu and: Associates $7,144.ll.
!
L
I
I
L
¡
I
L
I
L
L
L
f
I ) ,
L
I /)
L
I
I
L
L
Finance Review
Acct. 'Number 13-90-01-4200
de Available
L
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
-
-
LL
I
L
. Finance Director
Depa.rtment Head Slgnafúre
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
City Manager
Page 1 of 1
j
-----~- --
KOMATSU
ALBERT S. KOMATSU" ASSOCIATES, INC.
F":i. ], (-::.:':
,lDE'" !'-ICJ" :I. :::;~:, 1
til.i q ì...t ~=:. t. 1 ,~:~ ~I 1. ':y' Eš 5
Mr. Dennis Horvath
Assistant City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
F' . o. Bc;.; 1 :3609
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
RE'~ ':::¡f"iÍ iTI¿Ü Control Cei"'ltf?l~
(~\~31< Job 1\10. :I. ~.:;;:::; :!.
F' ":, ""1 .,:,,:,~
')f.:.1:! ':::~<::¡
STATEMENT for Architectural and Engineering Services
======:;~=======::========:=:===:====::====:===:~=~::====:~=:=:::=::=~:=:=:::===:=:~;::::::::::=:.=:=~:;=:~===
I::' ,.,::.~ f:~ l~ in C) tJ r't t. ~
Estimated Construction Cost
':þ ~~~ '7~S ~ :~:::t 9 II (~()
F; e (.~~ ;~::: ~? i~
II ()7
"... '~f;~ :~. ~? :; :':~ 7 ~2 ¡\ ::.;; 3
x ·~s 2 TS::: :t 9 . 00
'~
C:J1"2c:!:it +r"(~)fJ~ ~:aster' Plan Study
50% of $12~OOO.()O = ~;6()00~OO
One quarter prorate this facility
(.~:: l 0; :.~(j() II <)()
..... ,-~ ..... ..... -,.. .-- _.. ..~. ..... '"'' .....
TDt.<;~.l FC2",'
~j 1 ï'!, :7:/~2. ~~::~)
f:~cl-'!ern~3t i c:s;
:!. () () ~!~
C \Jinp], f~t. E
1;5 " OO~:
......
;:.- E~(·:'·:I E¿1!'~' n f..:'cf
1 '7'7)~:~ r. ~:.~::)
x
.-.
I)esign Devclop,nent
:tOO~í. Com¡:::lE,t¡??
2(). ~)~);.!': :'1.:
""
F' i.:::{~:~ E:: ¿3.ì.... n ed
1 }'77:2 II :2;~:3
...-
C:c)nt¡l-ac:t [)(JCuß1ents
:l.OO~1. Cc::mplc,:,t:.:.:'
.{.ji)" (0):; "
.....
F E' E~ C ,;:\ :r· n E'~ ci
:!. '7 '7"72:; :~:; :~:~
~:¡ub t, Dt.~ 1
1.... (,::~ ~:::. -::'5
p·:,::!,:id
t C) :D i9. t f:-:-
( F fi:\ (":~ D 1'''( ], Y )
Amount oi' Fee Due
¡:;~ E~ :i·. en!J t,i, ¡r' ~::. i b 1 E'::' s;
(~¡'¡fJi .n,rr 1\'0\:) DUE
F~~e AmO\.lr~t w:i.:t:t be ?djl.~~5·tec! t{~ Fil"~al (:~c)ns·t!'-L\ct:i~:~r1 C;~~:.~·t
fhi /c:r',
ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, INTERIOR DESIGNERS
P.O. BOX 2079
FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76113' 817/332-1914' METRO 429-7463
$ ::~ !f ê:':> \.~¡ 5 " E~S
~~. :~) II ::.5 ::.:.:; ·{f· " l\··7
.:*;}' ;¡ 1. () ~3 I' '7:;
."-_... ..... "...,-.....-. -. -- ,----
.:~. l :3 :.' ~~;:? I~..~ Jt :::'~ 5
:f ~7.>:;
...,.-...~.. 7',-'\
.- .'.. ..'
'_ri ,.... .... ~ .....,:_
--., ~- - ...- _.. --. ..." .þ.. .~.. --- ,.--
;~5·7 q .l. () ¡:::; .. {~' :~;
;~; ~~~ :~J I; C'
..... ~- -~. ..~..- -.. _. -" ...- _. y-
;j; / . 1. ·~f .¿~ ;:
,,_.0 "._"__'.~" _._ .... ~ ...._...~"_,,...... ..._. ., _. _....~_.__.__. _..._.._ _._ ~..... ._~~_, __..
'~; Albert S. Komatsu
Associates
Architects + Engineers
Project Name , ¡z, ¡.¡ .
4 ¡() ¡.-nJC.. 0 zJ
Purpose: CO(.M/C/L
Charge To M /2, 1/,
$254("
Office Use .
.__~.~ -.. ",,0_. . _
Requested By:
- ð,6-
.3.3/
Remarks l ßzELIH/~Arz
/
CðU ~c 1(..
µ.o
(
)
Total No. of ORIGINALS
Total No, of Prints EACH
/
REPRODUCTION ORDER
(
(
Size of Prints·
({30 x 42 1\
24 x 36
"
81h x 11
Spec la I Size
Type of Reproduction
. .
J
)
Xerox ( Bluellnêl
BLACK LINE Paper Sepia
Mylar Sepia $tlck-On
...
Albert S. Komatsu
Î - ~ssociates
IVchitects + Engineers
.
~ Project Name á
,
....
l Purpose:
Charge To
Office Use
-,,---
Date ¿,-
Project No. /3.
Remarks
(
]
REPRODUCTION ORDER
(
]
I
Total No. of ORIGINALS
~~T' 'al No. of Prints EACH
"-
Size of Prints·
24 x 36
30 x 42
Spec la I Size
.,
.Type of Reproduction
. .
)
((' . v .,ftr ~ BlueUn.
¿/
BLACK LINE Paper Sepia
Mylar Sepia $tlck-On ...
L
, CITY OF
NORTH ÎRICHLAND HILLS
¡
L
Pepartment:
Public Works
Council Meeting Pate:
l_
L
The city engineer has recommended'tb~t we move the sewer line; out from under the
concrete lined channel on thé:J_ tt'eet project. The main reason for moving
the sewer line is because theol lÚ1e wOuld be up .in the channel approximately
six inches and would càuse water .to back up inv·'c the channel.
Recommendation; The staffrecoDlllJeÌ1ds to approve change order Ìll in the total
amount of $18,823.90.
Funds are available iniþeUt::LlityCIP Unspecified account number 09-00-99-6700.
The staff recommends the t'tartsfer of$18,823.90 from th4t account to 09-00-75-6750.
Agenda Number:
8-26-85
~ ~-eJ
l_
Subject: Hewitt Street Pàving & Drainage Improvements Chànge \
Order 111 . . , '
r
L
I
L
r
L
l_
¡
L_
[
l_
¡
l_
¡
L_
L
l_
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct~ Number See above
Sutfiele ncls Avaitable
. Finance Director
l
Rev.
! ¡L"
l
L
"U> - ~;ec
Department Head Signa
.: é,TV COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 ot
I
,.,!, '
--/
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, I NC,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 14, 1985
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-210, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
HEWITT STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPVTS.,
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
Enclosed is Change Order No. 1 to the referenced project which has been signed by the
Contractor. This change order covers the cost of labor and materials required to
relocate the existing sanitary sewer main from Station 4+16 to Station 9+32 as shown
on the enclosed drawing.
After uncovering the existing sanitary sewer line it was discovered that the main is
located farther to the west and closer to the channel bottom than our records
indicated. Since the existing sewer line will be in confict with the proposed
concrete channel bottom construction, the Owner's Project Representative has requested
that the line be relocated to the east edge of the existing drainage and utility
easement. A concrete cap over the section of the proposed main which crosses under
the proposed channel will be required to protect the sewer siphon during channel
construction.
Please place this change order on the next Council agenda for consideration of
approval. After approval by the Council, please send an executed copy of the change
order form to our office for our files.
Meanwhile, please call if you have any questions.
~tvo OøÃ~
R HRD. L N,P.E.
RWAlra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
L r~
L[
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Utility
Subject: Big Fossil) Creek.Sanitat;Y'S~Wer OUtfä.llLine
Phase II, Pay Estlmateì2
,
t
l
,
L_
Cõûncil Meeting Date: 8-26-85
Agenda Number: PAY 85-43
r - This is çme of the newse.wer3¡1IIe.s::gping into the City· ·cif··Watauga and it is
L approximately 60% complete at this time.
[ Recommendation: The staff1:'.ecommends to approvethepaY1J1e.nt to P & R Construction
! Co., in th, e amount o£$62,843ó21.
L_
L_
l_
L
I
L
L
¡
L_
¡
L
l_
¡
¡
L
I
L
I
L
Finance Review
Acct. Number ...
Sufficient
09-00-74-6750
s Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Rev.
gr:;~et ~ ~~(JU;
. ... DepaTtme~re,
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
i
l_
L
í
l
L
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
--~~-,._,.,
~-/
.
KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
'--
CONSUL TlNC ENC INEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
August 13, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-421, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BIG FOSSIL CREEK SANITARY SEWER
WATAUGA TRUNK LINE - PHASE 2
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2
¡",-'~
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2, dated
August 13, 1985, made payable to P & R Construction Co. Inc., in the
amount of $62,843.21, for materials furnished and work performed on the
referenced project as of July 31, 1985.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the
original submittal, and we have checked the iten extensions and additions.
We reconmend that this payment, in amount of $62',843.21, be made to P & R
Construction Co. Inc., 2040 Loop 336, Suite 125, Conroe, Texas 77304.
". Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you
may have concerning this project.
Q~
DONALD H. CANTON, P.E.
DHC:bvg
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works v
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Scott Jenogan, utilities Inspector
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
P & R Construction Inc.
.~
550 FIRST ST ATE BANK BLDG. . BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211· METRO 1267-3367