The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1985-09-09 Agendas '- L L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 9, 1985 -6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted a~ the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambe~s, 7301 N.E.Loop 820. 1 i I '- NUMBER I L 1. I I I L I L 2. I t. 3. ¡ L i I L 4. L I L 5. I I I I L ¡ L 6. ITEM Long Range Water Supply - Mayor·Prò Tem Davis GN 85-87 Bank Depository Contract (Item #2.1) GN 8~-88 Request of Irving Groves of Williamsburg Associates, Inc. for Two Driveway Openings on Rufe Snow (Item #22) PU 85-26 Increase·· in Premium for General Liability/Property Insurance (Item #25~ . *Executive Session to Discuss Land, Personnel, and/or Litigation Other Items \ *Closed due to subject mattet as' provided by L the Open Meetings Law [ \ L- l ¡ I .... .;i;;; i I ACTION T~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 9, 1985 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. NUMBER ITEM 1. Call to Order ACTION TAKEN 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting August 26, 1985 5. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by Asterisk (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 & 30) 7. PZ 85-89 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Notre Damian Corp. to rezone a portion Qf Lot 1R, Block B, Calloway Farms Addition from C-1 (Commercial) to C-1-SU- (Specific Use) Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. (Birraporetti's Restaurant located in the North Hills Mall Shopping Center) 8. Ordinance No. 1275 Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PZ 85-91 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Pulido Association, Inc. to rezone Tract 11B3E, W.W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, from R-7 MF (Multi-Family) and LR (Local Retail) to LR-SU- (Specific Use) Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. (Located on Glenview Court at Loop 820, the existing Pulido's Restaurant) 10. Ordinance No. 1276 11. PZ 85-92 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Rojo Corporation to rezone a portion of Lot 1R, Block 1, Walkers Branch Addition from C-l (Commercial) to C-I-SU- (Specific Use) Sale of Beer for Off Premise Consumption (Located on the northwest corner of Emerald Hills Way and Grapevine Highway) 12. Ordinance No. 1277 13. PZ 85-94 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Jim Warren, Carry Beck, and Gail Douglas to rezone Lots 3K, 4K and parts of 3 and 4, Calloway Acres Addition from C-l (Commercial) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located on Parchman Street and Scruggs Drive, north of Grapevine Hwy. ) Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 14. Ordinance No. 1278 15. SO 85-11 Request by Carlisle Outdoor, Inc. for Billboard Sign on Lot 2, Block 10, Richland Heights Addition (Located at the Pilgrim Mini-Warehouse on the south side of Loop 820) *16. GN 85-82 Resolution No. 85-20, 1985 Certified Tax Roll *17. GN 85-83 Resolution No. 85-19, Authorizing Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions *18. GN 85-84 Ordinance No. 1279, Levying a Tax Rate *19. GN 85-85 Ordinance No. 1280, Adopting Budget for Fiscal Year 1985-86 *20. GN 85-86 Ordinance No. 1281, Adopting Revenue Sharing Budget for Fiscal Year 1985-86 *21. GN 85-87 Bank Depository Contract *22. GN 85-88 Request of Irving Groves of Williamsburg Associates, Inc. for Two Driveway Openings on Rufe Snow *23. GN 85-89 Resolution No. 85-21, Proposed IH 820/FM 1938 Interchange Improvements Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 24. GN 85-90 Appointment to Cable Advisory Board *25. PU 85-26 Increase in Premium for General Liability/Property Insurance *26. PAY 85-44 Oversizing Water Mains for Oak Hills Subdivision *27. PAY 85-45 Morgan Meadows East Drainage Improvements Partial Pay Estimate /13 *28. PAY 85-46 Hewitt Street Paving and Drainage Improvements, Pay Estimate /12 *29. PAY 85-47 Harwood Road Street and Drainage Improvements, Partial Pay Estimate 116 *30. PAY 85-48 Glenview Drive Street and Drainage Improvements, Pay Estimate 115 31. Citizen Presentation 32. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 26, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. "--- 1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order August 26, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Virginia Moody Harold Newman Jim Kenna Jim Ramsey -- Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Gene Riddle Mike McEntire Lee Maness Richard Royston Richard Albin Marjorie Nash Press: Duward Bean Mark England Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Public Works Director Attorney . Finance Director Director of Planning City Engineer Planning & Zoning Member Northeast Chronicle Mid Cities 3. Councilman Newman gave the invocation. 4. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of August 12, 1985. Motion carried 5-0, Councilmen Kenna and Ramsey abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed Item /121 from the Consent Agenda. 6. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. ~ ,CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 12, 1985 APPROVED REMOVAL OF ITEM (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (10, 12, 13, 14, 15. 19, 20, 22, 23, 24 & 25) APPROVED ."-- 7. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Ordinance No. 1270. Motion carried 7-0. 8. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Long stated that when this request went before the Planning & Zoning Commission they were asked to reduce the commercial zoning request. Mr. Long stated that they complied with this request. Mr. Long stated they had taken 11 acres out of the commercial zoning request and made it R-5~SD. Mr. Long stated they were trying to do some re-routing on Precinct Line Road and perhaps cul-de-sac Shady Grove Road. Mr. Long stated they would probably have mini-mall sites. Councilwoman Moody asked if the property backed up to Shady Grove Church. ~ Mr. Long stated yes, and they had been in liaison with church representatives. Mr. John Barfield, Owner, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield stated that they had been trying to add to their total land so that they would have more rooftops because they realized that without rooftops the commercial property would not be as valuable. Mr. Barfield stated that in the Cities of Bedford and Hurst he had commercial property and in the past when the needs changed they went back and changed the zoning to single family or multi-family. Mr. Barfield stated they felt commercial would be the best use of the land. Mayor Echols asked Mr. Barfield if he had considered some type of buffering next to the church. Mr. Barfield stated they had met with representatives of the church and advised them they would work with them. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the public hearing. .~ August 26, 1985 Page 2 PZ 85-40 PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 1270 APPROVED PZ 85-42 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - REQUEST OF B.H.& L. JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE TRACT 10A, 10B, 10A1, lOBI, T. PECK SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1210, & PART OF TRACT 5, BRENTWOOD ESTATES FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) & C-l (COMMERCIAL) TO C-l (COMMERCIAL) (TRACT 1) (LOCATED EAST AND WEST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD IN THE AREA OF SHADY GROVE ROAD AND WILSON LANE) - 9. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Ordinance No. 1254. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated this was a lot of commercial zoning and asked how many acres the Northeast Mall contained. Mr. Long stated that the City of Hurst had passed an ordinance that prohibited zoning over 50 acres for malls. The purpose of this was to have a scaled-down parking version. Mr. Long stated there was a parking problem at Northeast Mall and he would like to have enough property zoned commercial so there would be ample parking. Mr. Royston stated that North Hills Mall was approximately 50 acres and Northeast Mall was 60 plus acres. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that his concern was not knowing what was going to be there. Councilman Fisher asked if this zoning would be in compliance with the Land Use Plan. Mr. Royston stated yes, there was commercial at both intersections. .- Councilman Ramsey stated this was a lot of commercial; but they had to have their zoning before they could plan the development. Motion carried 7-0. *10. 11. Mr. Line stated there was a controversy on how the city's Subdivision Ordinance would apply pertaining to the storm drainage and the staff recommended postponement until the city and the owners could work out some type of agreement. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to deny PS 85-32 until an agreement by the City and owner could be reached. Motion carried 7-0. ~ August 26, 1985 Page 3 ORDINANCE NO. 1254 APPROVED PZ 85-90 AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE ALLOWING PET STORES IN C-l (COMMERCIAL) & C-2 (COMMERCIAL) DISTRICTS, ORDINANCE NO. 1268 APPROVED PS 85-32 REQUEST OF TERRY SISKo J.B. SANDLIN & MIKE SANDLIN FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 9 THROUGH 13. JOHNS ADDITION. THIRD FILING (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAVIS BLVD. AND SOUTH OF THE ST. LOUIS & SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD) DENIED August 26, 1985 Page 4 *12. PS 85-46 REQUEST OF JACK ROSEBERRY FOR ~ FINAL PLAT OF LOT 9, BLOCK I, MOLLIE B. COLLINS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SMITHFIELD ROAD AT MICKEY STREET) APPROVED *13. PS 85-50 REQUEST OF BURK COLLINS INVESTMENTS FOR REPLAT OF LOT 3R, BLOCK 50, NOR'EAST ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE WEST S IDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND EXTENDING THROUGH TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOLA DRIVE AND ROBERTA DRIVE) APPROVED *14. PS 85-51 REQUEST OF GLENVIEW PARK JOINT -- VENTURE FOR REPLAT OF LOTS lOA-R & 10B-R, . BLOCK 1, AND BLOCK 2 AND LOTS 10AR & 10BR, BLOCK 1, GLENVIEW PARK ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF GLENVIEW DRIVE AND WEST OF JACKIE LEE LANE) APPROVED *15. PS 85-52 REQUEST OF WILLIAMSBURG ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 1R, 2R, 3, & 4, BLOCK 7, INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE) APPROVED "- "-- 15a. Mr. Line stated the owner of the property did not want to dedicate right-of-way for Bedford Euless Road and Blackfoot. Mr. Line stated the developer was willing to sign a covenant which would dedicate additional right-of-way at such time in the future as actual street improvements were to be made. Mr. Line stated that in the opinion of the City Attorney the covenant would adequately protect the city. Mr. McEntire stated he had checked the covenant and it looked okay, but he would like to check it further. Mr. McEntire stated the Mayor's signature could be withheld until an agreement satisfactory to the staff was worked out. Mr. Long stated they had a crucial deadline and would like to have the plat approved so they could obtain a building permit August 27th. Mr. Long stated that they would work out an agreement with the staff and attorney. Mr. Line stated it was his understanding that the permit was not needed until September 3rd. Mr. Long stated he stood to be corrected, September 3rd was correct. ~ Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if they would be able to build any permanent structures within the right-of- way. Mr. Royston stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission had addressed structures within the right-of-way and that signs and so forth would needed to be addressed in the covenant. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PS 85-60 subject to a letter of agreement being worked out with the City Manager and Attorney. Motion carried 7-0. 16. Mr. Line stated that the budget contained what the City Council felt was priority needs of the City. Mr. Line stated that contained in the budget was a proposed 33.5 cent tax rate which would be a reduction from last year. Mr. Line stated that adoption of the budget would be on September 9th. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. '- There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. August 26, 1985 Page 5 PS 85-60 REQUEST OF B.R. NOWELL FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1 CARDER ADDITION APPROVED GN 85-78 PUBLIC HEARING - OPERATING BUDGET "- 17. Mr. Line stated the Proposed Revenue Sharing Budget was for replacement of the Finance Department's computer system, $67,000; purchase of modular ambulance unit and all associated equipment for the Fire Department, $54,000; Total Proposed Budget $121,000. Mr. Line stated that adoption of the budget would be on September 9th. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 18. Dr. Alexander Graham, 735 Oakwood Trail, Fort Worth, came before the Council. Dr. Graham stated his medical clinic was located at 5342 Davis Boulevard and he was requesting a second driveway opening onto Davis Boulevard. Dr. Graham stated he wanted a circular drive so his patients would not have to back out onto Davis Boulevard. Mayor Echols asked Dr. Graham if there was parking in the rear of the building. Dr. Graham replied yes. -- Councilman Kenna asked Dr. Graham if the circular drive would be one-way. Dr. Graham replied yes, there would be enter and exit signs installed. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to deny GN 85-80. Councilman Fisher stated that Dr. Graham had a valid concern. Without the double drive there would be a tendency to back out on Davis Blvd. Councilwoman Moody stated she was concerned for the safety of the patients but felt they could turn around in the back parking lot. Motion for denial carried 5-2; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilmen Newman and Ramsey and Councilwomen Moody and Hinkle voting for and Councilmen Kenna and Fisher voting against. *19. '- August 26, 1985 Page 6 GN 85-79 PUBLIC HEARING - REVENUE SHARING BUDGET GN 85-80 REQUEST OF DR. ALEXANDER GRAHAM FOR CURB CUT ON DAVIS BOULEVARD DENIED GN 85-81 RESOLUTION NO. 85-18, APPROVING ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS FOR M & H REALTY COMPANY APPROVED *20. "--- 21. Mr. Line stated that on August 12th a contract was awarded to First Continental Financial Corp. for lease/purchase financing for Fire Department equipment. Mr. Line stated that on August 22nd a meeting was held with First Continental Financial Corp. and representatives of the company informed Mr. Maness that a mistake had been made on the initial proposal and they wanted to change the bid amount. Mr. Line stated the representatives were informed that this was not acceptable to the City. Therefore, the Staff was recommending the second low bidder, First Union Leasing Corp., in the amount of $10,080.86 at an interest rate of 7.76%. Mr. Line stated the City would pursue action against First Continental Financial Corp. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve the bid of First Union Leasing Corp., Ordinance No. 1273. Motion carried 7-0. -- *22. *23. *24. *25. -- August 26, 1985 Page 7 PU 85-24 SELF-INSURING THE CITY'S WORKER'S COMPENSATION PROGRAM APPROVED PU 85-25 LEASE/PURCHASE FINANCING FIRE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT APPROVED PAY 85-40 PAYMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL FEES TO KOMATSU AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE CENTER APPROVED PAY 85-41 PAYMENT TO KOMATSU AND ASSOCIATES FOR ARCHITECTURAL FEES FOR THE ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER APPROVED PAY 85-42 HEWITT STREET PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER 111 APPROVED PAY 85-43 BIG FOSSIL CREEK SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL LINE PHASE II, PAY ESTIMATE /12 APPROVED '-- -- -- August 26, 1985 Page 8 26. Mr. Billy Williams, 7437 North Richland Boulevard, appeared before the Council. CITIZEN PRESENTATION Mr. Williams stated he would like to thank the City for getting the property next to his mowed. Mr. Williams stated that he would also like to thank the officers that had been patrolling Holiday Lane. 27. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to adjourn the meeting. ADJOURNMENT Motion carried 7-0. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY · L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and neve lopmen t Department: VUbje.ct: Zoning App lic$.t ion North Hills Shopping Center Ordinance No. 1275 9/9/85 Cóuncil Meeting Date: Agenda Number: . PZ 85-89 I L L This Zoning Application iSP1;esented on a portion oftÞe.NörthHills Shopping Center Building. The requested rezoning is from C-1 Commereialto (C."l~U Commercial-Specific Use-of Alcoholic Beverages. . . The applicants propose to operate a Birraporetti' s Restaurant in the Mall and wis1'1toserve alcoholic beverageswiditheir food service. I L This request for Specific t1se>.,,~thor~za.tion comes as a reS'-1ltØfthe favorable ruling given by the Tarrant Coun~y Distt:iC;tAttorney's Office ottth, entire City of North Richland Hills being "wet"regat:din¡the sale of alc.Oholi.c1:>eve1:'ages. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning a.nd Zoning commission recÓ1nmended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-89. L L ¡ ì '-- L L~/ L ¡ L L Source of Funds: Acct. Number ( Bonds (GOIAev.) SufflcièntFunds Available ~Y3l~~~~gn.l.r. / 1f:~~6 L CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review ; Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I"' /" PZ 8~460 c..~ To 820 (:,Z 5U# ()~TJ.I2.43 ,qP, 7-g·9S ../ ./ I / I R-7-MF ~ 2-21-85 1087, 1093, 1097, 1106,1 1110, I 1120, ~ 4 . ~ ¡¡ U .. = !I¡~I ; I. e ~ " , ~ . ~ ô ~ . e ~ ~ e ~ Q I PZ9S-Q I R-1·MF ~ L.~ To I..~ sv- 1124, 1128, - -".- /133, 1145, 1153, 1159, /163. 1168 1174, 117 DATE OR REVIS .. I R-I SINGLE FAMILY I R-2 SINGLE FAMILY I R·3 ] SINGLE FAM IL Y DIST I R-4-SDI SEPARATE OWNERSHIP. - . DUPLEX DISTRICT I R-5-D I DUPLEX DISTRICT·'· l R-6-T ¡ TOWNHOUSE AND GARD - HOME DISTRICT LR-7-MFI MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT I 0-1 1 OFFICE DIST~ICT I L R I' LOCAL RETAIL DISTRIC! -.-...."',....... LIABLE " iOO 2000 2500 3000 ~ "-- fH RICHLAND HILLS I ! L Page 2 ( P & Z Minutes August 12, 1985 \........ 2. PS 85-46 PS 85-46 APPROVED 3. PS 85-50 PS 85-50 APPROVED -- ..4. --. PS 85-51 PS 85-51 APPROVED 5. PS 85-52 APPROVED 6. PZ 85-89 "-. ( Chairman Bowen stated this also located on Smithfield Request of Jack Roseberry for final plat of Lot 9, Block 1, Mollie B. Collins Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion t approve PS 85-46 subject to the gineer's comments. This motion as seconded by Mr. Tucker and the m ion carried 5-0. Request of Burk llins Investments for replat of t 3R, block 50, Nor'East Add' ion. Mr. Wood ade the motion to approve PS 85- This motion was seconded by Mr. cker and the motion carried 5-0. Glenview Park Joint Venture for replat of Lots 10A-R & 10B-R, .Block 1, and Block 2, Glenview Park Addition. Due to a conflict of interest, Mr. Wood requested he be allowed to abstain from voting on this request. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 85-51. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0 with Mr. Wood abstaining and the ------ alternate member voting in his place. Request of Williamsburg Associates, Inc. for replat of Lots lR, 2R, 3, & 4, Block 7, Industrial Park Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-52. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Notre Damian Corporation to rezone a portion of Lot 1R, Block B, Calloway Farms Addition, from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. Thi9-property is located in the North Hills mall at 7624 Grapevine Highway. Page 3 P & Z Minutes August 8, 1985 '\...- ~' ( ( Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Michael Burkett, Attorney, came forward to represent Notre Damian Corporation doing business as Birraporetti's Restaurant. He stated this area has now been declared wet by the County officials and the location meets the requirements and the Corporation meets all the State requirements. Mr. Burkett said they are aware to the requirement of 3-2 ratio. He said he has Mr. Murphy, Manager of North Hills Mall with him. Rick Murphy came forward. He said they have 170,00 square foot Sanger Harris, 100,000 square foot Striplings Cox, and 117,000 leasable area for the mall. He said they had recently added much ar~a to the mall. Mr. Murphy said they had a study made which showed the need for an additional department store, an additional theatre, more tenant space, and additional restaurants. He stated Birraporetti's is an 8000 square foot high caliber restaurant. Michael Ferand, Houston, Texas, came forward. He stated they have 1.2 million dollar construction allowance. He said this restaurant would create 100 jobs for the area and 50% of their customers were American Express chargers. Mr. Ferand stated they have a 12 year history of service and gave the Commission copies of the menu. Chairman Bowen stated they would be required to give the City Council the name of an individual for the Specific Use. Mr. Ferand said they would take care of that. -" Page 4 P & Z Minutes August 8, 1985 ( ( ',,- Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. PZ 85-89 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-89. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 7. PZ 85-91 Request of Pulido Assoc., Inc. to rezone Tract 11B3E, W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, from its present classifications of R-7-M (Multi-Family) & LR (Local Ret I) to LR-Specific Use-Sale of Alco lic Beverages. This property located at 8014 Glenview Drive. Chairman Bowen opene the Public Hearing and called or those wishing to speak in favo of this request to please come ard. John Rodri es, Vice President and General nager, came forward. He stated hey had been at that location for years. He said it used to be th r number one store, but the last ree years it has hit the bottom. Mr. Rodriques said he felt the sale of alcoholic beverages with their food would bring the sales up. He said they have 13 stores in the area and alcohol is 10% of their gross sales. """-- '"", Chairman Bowen stated they would have to give the City Council the name of an individual for the Specific Use. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-91 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-91. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. "- /~ . (\ . CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth· Dallas K NOWL TON-E NG LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC. July 30, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-89 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-1 TO 'C-2 SU' REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 144 -"''''Wi We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development "--< / Zoning Review PZ 85-89 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 L ( '[ST "~ NORTH HILLS MALL 7624 Grapevine Highway North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 (817) 589-2236 May 10,1985 Mr. Michael Horan Notre Damian Corporation 1997 W. Gray Houston, TX 77019 Dear Mr. Horan: I As the Manager of North Hills Mall and as the authorized agent for JMB Centers, which is the operator of the Mall with full contractual control over the businesses to be operated in the Mall, this is to give you authority and permission to apply to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for a zoning change that will allow your business to operate a restaurant and bar within the confines of the Mall in space number 900 of the North Hills Mall expansion area. -'>'....'" Very truly yours, /2JJr!)~ Richard W. Murphy General Manager RWM: lad - '} A Project of Federated Stores Realty, Inc. Leased & Managed by JMB/Centers ',- ORDINANCE NO. 1275 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE /11080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 . AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-89 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. BEING a portion of the North Hills Mall Expansion designated as space 900 and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a concrete monument at the intersection of the easterly R.O.W. line of State Highway 26 and at the northerly line of the Texas Electric Company R.O.W.; '- THENCE North 82 degrees 58 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of 745.96 feet to a point of beginning, said point being the most northwesterly intersection of an interior wall with an exterior wall and continuing with said exterior wall the following calls: THENCE North 64 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 10.93 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 19 degrees 34 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 42.72 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 64 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 31.17 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 71 degrees 35 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 43.02 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 25 degrees 48 minutes 29 seconds East, a distance of 30.00 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 64 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 5.08 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 25 degrees 48 minutes 29 seconds East, at approximately 10.0 feet passing from an exterior wall to an interior wall and continuing, in all a distance of 32.08 feet to a point for a corner and continuing with said interior wall the following calls: "-- Page 2 THENCE South 64 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds West, a distance of 51.06 feet to an angle point; '- THENCE North 25 degrees 48 minutes 29 seconds West, a distance of 7.33 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 64 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds West, a distance of 59.36 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 25 degrees 48 minutes 29 seconds West, a distance of 47.92 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 64 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 2.0 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 25 degrees 48 minutes 29 seconds West, a distance of 6.83 feet to the point of beginning and containing 8107 square feet of area, more or less. This property is located in the North Hills Mall at 7624 Grapevine Highway. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF AUGUST, 1985. "-, £l~_,/~ /?¡",&llftJ-..'\ Iv <:}'þ L ~. ~., w:..v- ~ V CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~~ie~~ SE~ PLANNIN6~v ZO~;~ISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-89 IS HEREBY REZONED C-I-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES THIS 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '-- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and n,~elopment Department: / I UUbject: Zoning application Glenview Court at IH 820 9/9/85 Coun¢1I Meeting Date: PZ 85-91 Agenda Number: Ordinance No. u'76 ~ j ~ { ~ ~ ~'- ~ ~ ~ ~ Source of Funds: I L Bonds (GG/Rev.) ~~~ ÎfžljÍ{./-Ä ~ - Depa ent Head Signature 'ð1\y Mànagèr I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I J '- This Zoning application$sptesented on the existingP.tJlidQ'st~Staurant on Glenview Court at Loop 820. Thet:eques~ed rezoning is from R-7-MFMu.lti...Pamily and LR Local Retail to LR-SU Local Reta$l..,.Sipecifi~<pse-Sale of Alc()ho11C;B,,'!erages . The purpose for the proposed rezoning istQall!,,~he~2fisting restaur¡µitt()s.rvealcoholic beverages. Again, this request isbaseduponth,et:evised status of th$s'pattof the City. The Staff noted to theContm:i$siOJ:¡,tl1..tthe request included an area of Multi-Family Zoning apparently due t()~near.~~er_pp1ng error. Appro"lralof the current request will place the entire site in One .. zone. RECOMMENDATION: The Plattnin:g· and Zoning Commission recômlaendedapproval of Zoning Application PZ 85-91. ~ Finance Review Acct. Number Sufflclent Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 ~ ....~. V H§~~'ËåE' ~ 'PO ~><\AY Lk~' --.,,\. ,'- ~' ... -+..--.:x " Cf-2 C- :(', g ~r-- ":::...LI '\'\/1~ C-2;::: '-----'-- w su* ~ .;" / 'V~+--, .' 11, I Þ I 1087 -L- t: .:.~' A ('\)<..)/61- , f----. \- f- LR s.u. I": 4 C-I ~^ I- h--i '-: L- ~. o' S.u.Jt. W- TiYffRLl" Iffrf / ~ì' ~ jr"'~:.~., I....'··· ir r'! I r ¡ , ...... "-4" .......... ~. ~ñ211 .! I, I, I \ .r-c. ..... '... "oo~' q ,,()MT. I I I c:: U '... N R .......... \'~ Pš'ü o':~/~ poor"" ... I ~ I--~ ...........c ..'G......, ~.R. ,-P185-$' C'2CŠ1uo ....~. ~ S.u.· MC, -, 1'0 ~-, su· " Hr."'-m·j{~ --........ 7ff-=ì-- -' - , 11- f- r-- ,....'- .-- - I .....¡,¡. ~= - --\......., I-- . 'I-- Y0= ~ I-- -::-i ~j C I J'~'. c·~ f? 8~·60 c.·Z it> 820 "2 Su· cflf·'2.43 II~~J···~ , "I: , ~ O/FW \ \" C-2 c.onu. C-2 - C-2 \ l- i I I 1 I ! , ' lillliF-t: ..., '/ t-î J Çf'I¡~ \ \ ~~';':, L....t:: I c:~~ ~\ C-I\ .}»::v- , .' Corm/. / \, FP \ -~ -71 \ \ I I \ ' ~v...... - \ \ _ . )J...è?¡; U( I '>-If . '\ \ . -:: : , I '...._ , 1 ~r\ \ U ~ -ç--h !I Inn ~.' y Ilf g '; E' -: c- FP .~ . ~ ~ ~ I I I I ¡ I I I .... rwr I I: I I Ii, ,Wg I I I r- - I' " 4- - il ~ =t= ç = -! = '- PD //\ t:~þ U , R-7-MF 11i ·~~11"~IL .... ... C·lr. \ :¡ . ! I , I I I ILR I " R-2 FP -' --- ------ -.-------- - ------- ~- -- ------ -~-------- ---------~--- ----.-- I -II- ..;-- ..- " T 100 1500 2000 2500 3000 ;;;;;;¡...- 10RTH RICH LAND HILLS - ,/_1 ,~ " I f---- ; 1- - 1- L-~~r! -: , II t-1! rc:it ", ~ \ i l bO-- ":1 T - ¡ C·IS.U. . .- /" /' / I / / I '. --..- : 2-21-85 tOe IO~ 10£ 110 III( 112 112 II< II: II' II~ II: II II' ' II ~ · · % '" ;: w. · M I pa.~5-q I R-7~MF 'i L.f To I..~ SU· DATE RE\ THIS "'AP ..."S "CCOIIO..NCE wI' OCT. 4, 1t77. T 'OlE CITY Of ~IAB~E fOil' -- I R-I SINGLE FAMILY DIS I R·2 SINGLE FAMILY DIS ! R-3 I SINGLE FAM IL Y DI~ I R-4-SDI 6G~~~:T~I~i'R~~~S.. I R-5-DI DUPLEX DISTRICT' I R-6-T I TOWNHOUSE AND G - HOME DISTRICT !R-7-MF! MULTIFAMILY DI51 I a-I! OFFICE DIST~ICT ~ L R ~ LOCAL_~=~~IL "'~~. , Page 4 P & Z Hinutes August 8, 1985 ( ( "- Chairman Bowen called for wishing to speak osition to this request ase come forward. made the motion to approve PZ 85-89. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 7. PZ 85-91 Request of Pulido Assoc., Inc. to rezone Tract 11B3E, W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, from its present classifications of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) & LR (Local Retail) to LR-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located at 8014 Glenview Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request. to please come forward. "-- John Rodriques, Vice President and General Manager, came forward. He stated they had been at that location for 15 years. He said it used to be their number one store, but the last three years it has hit the bottom. Mr. Rodriques said he felt the sale of alcoholic beverages with their food -----------------------·------~------wouIêIDrìng tnesiles up:-He saicr-- . they have 13 stores in the area and alcohol is 10% of their gross sales. Chairman Bowen stated they would have to give the City Council the name of an individual for the Specific Use. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-91 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-91. This motion was -5~onded by Ms. Nash and the motion carr~ed 5-0. "--- ,. t \. ( . K NOWL TON-E NG LI S H-F LOWE RS, INC. "- CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 30, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-91 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM 'R-7-MF, LRI TO 'LR SUI REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 11511 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~------------ , ~ ' RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. - ----- ------ R\1A/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public lrorks Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development "- Zoning Review PZ 85-91 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ..... . ~. . . ;; - -~ à~ rrJt'1 :Z:Z 0.0 f"I1rrJ AI .., AI 'c - .... ~.~ '() VI ~.,.~:... -' c '1/1 \D ..' DI'V' ,. t", ~ 0.0' ..... DI n, '"" ·C .... ., 'It> AI <: 111 0. n¡ ,.. ... t.D C t", ,.. \,.J 1/1 ::I 0 "'-- N ë5~:;:; ~ 0 AI 'AI ¡...::~. ',: ~:~. ::i:... ~ .... Z PO ···n,¡·,~'\,.J!t.D~ J'D ~ g ~'. .. :,.. '''''''/0'0 ,..,:3 . 't"fI ~;" n.·' ::r t'f '/O.'/O:J'D .:.,;,) C. J'D....J'D 'n n' O./D:O ",'", O' 1/1.:;) . ". . '"",,. 'n . It '/0 :AI .::r ro,·.., ,It:'" - n '.. '< c /0,:. ... :3 . 0. .c: 0.. i~ Þ"" It ~;~ n '''' ~ ,$'00 · O;,J " J: ~ ........ ~- " ,.... 1"1. ~. <: ... "., ~. ..., I I I I . "II ;: c ¡ i: ~ ,~ ~;~·.i!~:..·· :.! )~.,...\.~,.. '''',,"':-''''; '<:. ":" fh·;· .~ . ..,. Ii '", ,~ "'-- AI ::I 0. I .1 ,. :r .111 :::5...:'. , 00· '. ....~. , :3 ::I t", .:3 ':00 o .... .' 'j ..... II ~,~-"_." .. . . ":~ . "-~-'-' ,,--..-........ I' .,'E.~ III;',,..' ".OQ. . . ","'t. ..... ' 111 ::I ::1::1 ~ .... "'::1 Ooc O' . ,., "CI 5 ~. ,.,/ '< ',,.. :r ~ ... II>;.~ ~ 0 11/....., 1/1 ,.. ':7 /1 = 'v. n o ." ::I III. ... o .... III roo ., III 'n' ,.' o ,...., ;, :-:- ;... E r. ... r-- ";., '3\' < O' ~ § ~, ,,~~.:,' '~f:.:' "". III ~ /1 '-oJ 'l' o o " ;¿/ .. '. '. ~~~~·f~~( -~ ~ -~ \\ ~, ....~ ~ -~ " : I ;~ ¡ . ¡ ; -r.- :c: AH..r ,.' , " ! ' , " " , , ¡, 4 Zl .......',' ,; .. 'fi:.' ,'I ' '" '.""1.. ~ II --.-- .... " 'i ~,~~ o~ "1 ~t) ~ "\ I , -1 (p , - ~ , ('\.' ~ )( '" ~ ~ t 'C\ )~ ~f~ ..0 "" '~ -~ ~ ,~ '\ N ~' t, ~ '~ ~ s ~' f\ )., = ~~ '"'t> ~(\ ~ C' ~ I 'i " t) :.....{) ,\/11 ? \ l ~ ~ t---- I 's:,,' ~~6 ~ ~ ~.~ t + -1 -- --- 1<:> I fit ~~ ~"i ,~ )~ ~t ~() . . :'-~'''"'t' -- ''''I x '" - ~ 0 "4 t1 , ... ' , \ N~ ()'( è C-....., tI\~ --- -+ I I ~ !.J) ,- ie ~ I Jr t I \------1 ',J '~ () ... " 't ... { .r.. ~ /loT '"', -.. - "'-_.. .... .....~'... ......-. --- / (7 ?: 7?.J 'J .~ \ì",,~\ Y ,,_ '", \ \.\ ~ ~ \ ~ (y-.( - , \ ' 'f' , ~ .,~, 't., :. ".,.,.)' "-J"-.J - ---.....r -~\.~ > "" ,,{1\ l.. ( ~""\" II ), I . ~~ ,I.;:::) ( í'\ -.. 5.:\.S,). <) r, ',."7 ~~_~) ~ ~ \ , ~ 'r ~ "¿ ..\\.)3_-<, \' ,,~,;"'~, - ~ ¡ , ~ \. -. --ÎP \ .' .. / \.... ~ \ }." ð 7 ¿;:; ~l?ee\V4 y ORDINANCE NO. 1276 ~ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE 111080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-91 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-MF & LR to LR-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. BEGINNING at the northeast corner of a tract of land as recorded in Volume 4584, Page 340, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE West 195.67 feet to a point on a curve with a radius of 440.20 feet; ''-- THENCE along said curve in a northwesterly direction 4.62 feet to the end of curve and the beginning of a curve to the right with a radius of 390.20 feet; THENCE along said curve 93.53 feet to the end of curve; THENCE North 00 degrees 03 minutes West 12.79 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 40 minutes East 211.79 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 58 minutes West 108.93 feet to the point of beginning and containing 22,579.25 square feet or 0.518 acres of land more or less. '- Page 2 - This property is located at 8014 Glenview Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF AUGUST, 1985. ~v1 æ ð{J~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~~~ SECRET Y PLANNI£JlliV ZONING' OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-91 IS HEREBY REZONED LR-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES THIS 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. ',- MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ',-- L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS L Department: Planning and DevelQptnent Council Meeting Date: 9/9/85 ubject: Zoning Ap-plicatiotl Northwest Corner El11era1.d\Hills Agenda Number: PZ 85-92 L Ordinance No. 1277 ätGrapevine Highway ¡ L This Zoning Applicationis.p:t'esentediøn a portion of the.newCommercial building on the northwest corner of EmeraldHillsWay.andGrapevine Highway-.TÞe requested rezoning is from C-1 Commercial to. C-l StJComJ».etc.ial-Specific Use-SaleofJ\Beer for off-premises consumption. The applicatltsa1;eeonstructing a convenience store in the center and wish to have off-premises beer·sal.'~ L ¡ L RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and. Zoning COmtnission recOmmended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-92. I '- L L LL L ¡ I l ~ 1 ~ Source of Funds: ~ Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ ~ingBU~_ Z ' ý~~ «- y"':JhÞ J 1df1. ~ ~ De~H~ãture . Clly Managar ¡ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM L- Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 , .""i:'<}::;;',"" ,,~ ~~~·I: )--~ ~~ ' ~~ '/ ~Q~ ~ C- ~ ' ,~ --~ I ~' ~~ ~- ! C-I ~~ ~ C-ls,u,.~tI.Rt1~ - I--- C-I.,~ ... s;ø ........ : ,Ì¡u. 1 Á ~ ~- ~ V I- ~ ý~ c-rL. /~ Sl - I- L r '''I~ , ~ I ~ ~ ¿~ Coil VI, : ~ C-I S.U. t1.i(-·'" ~ 'f'. h' , -c;..-Z¿ i.~ j ¡ / "::I" 0·,' 1-' I I -~ : t: r; \\ \ i ~S!. I' -t:I .., ~ i ! i I ./~ 4t/i"~'IWI ~ 't:1Z y. \ \, :~~\~ c:.L:! ~ ~~~'Y/('í I ¡IITl: I ,~ 1 \ .~ J ~JI-'l I Ii' I I I I I I" , . " PDt I I ¡I! I ! II I! I F.P. I" ) L -11~: T ~ 1\ C/' ST I \ ~ - r- II11 '!I: i J-:. 1 ¡I 1;- . . I ' I' , , " "I ! i rº-lOIo\II : , .... , '/....,' C- f _!~ ~ I I i ¡ 'I I 1'1 I I ~' ==l - I F.P. . '-.J1': æs=? ~ , "t::: c. r, T.OUS .L.... ,~~ ,,~-' .. :J'C :! ~,'. :...-..~""....c ¡ , f I" C-I ~f=CrL>" I ......_--J...... ~"',:¡\- B Þ:::~"C,'C ='- ~ f-..~' I R-7 - "F /~r- ~ 't-;--tÞ- " I fYI' , ' " t' L,U..':'! ,~. t... .... R-3 , , , ¡=VTíTTi"I~~ E .. .... F.p. \1 II -:- . ' , . ~t:J ~,.........:.~ ~, -.... , ...... ....... , ....~ " \ ........... '... \ " i-- !!IIIII-11 I II I( ~¡~ ;;ç ~;;.ï= - R-7-MF \L/Í \\~ ~ JR-7-MF ~.~~ ,- ! X~M~-' '" pi!.ß$-1~ ~R"'6-T ~!g-T ¡:: 1/\, ~I I C-I ......... 2 \ , I I TO T ~ î::::::f!!I II 8 .- II ' " J c-I SLJ':;' i ~I t- C-I I, -.-......,., ~ 1_ . " - I II I , i- ~ ¡ I -- .~-'::-/\.."l"':-I I JcL I I '1!: -rrr = C-I .. ~}.. '\ ri'ï't'i '" 11 I , r- . ,,((/~0"- . . ~. --:: t~ ~LlT ~'R 5-D' c-~ ~~t7)f r-PD ~ ~~ ~r - ~ X~ IYÎ '1 -:Ir II ~ ~ == ~lh~c_~'L F{<ç?,~': ~ " , -~ II i II I !ie ~'" I' : i I :2 I /~~~. ~ ~ i I '- ,lìll ~~' '/...,~ 'r- I '''.'hll , -. I-¡L..Y - ... L:., II I~ ~C-I '//11- 1-1- ~I- ,-' I; I I II u.. Y ~L J 1-,- - I \ rr 'M..... '''~'....ð. - ,- --,4 I I I I I T ~v~~.ç::I, _ _,-'! R-I -I- , ..... " TY' p;UøÞ ,....; .. , -7-MF CAt(': :1~, i- T'/ -,' ~~:S<'Ç ',-, ct ~ = ~ _ J'! V~~.. ~ C- - , I, I "'-f ~..' =~-~-- j u.~~ 0. _ ~;y¡W W = - ~.:.~ ! S~~"" ~"-~ ;- f- _ IIrot ! ....... 1 ( " , , i ; , ~- ,:;:J~ "!:J: - ¡ ~VlS,U. . ~, B?I WORICH ,... I \l..:----f1-Il 5J[ ~'I ",Hot L.O"... SJJ ":~/,J, ..... I.. -~l8S-3' C, vi 0 C -I To C~I SUe s.u. )[&,. "'9 S" ,8l0 ---..... ' ~'. '-" c- IJ.¡". C·2 'fZ 8~·60 c. -~ To 'þ'Z SU" 01f.I2.4-3 . !>:'~7-"'S I / / I 'I ,. /' " ,/ C-2 = I : I ; I ..... ,! I' ì PDÂ ~ I IT -: @ u 1 ~ gI1=i:r: ! 'l![ >- T I : gjl [l~ R·7.",,' = 2-21-8511087, 1090, 1091, 1092 ~ 01'\". .""'" ,,,,,,,", """""~ , - ~- ._. - \ -~._- ! I I , ~~§ ~r H / III i '/'\ 1111111 ,> I-I '" P2BS-;14- A/i¡ T'Þ I-I AG-- ~ ... ..... +'" -' -<. ,<S ~ I u I I ~ -, Page 5 P & Z Minutes.._. August 8~ 1985 ( ( \..,.... c· _........ __..... __.'_...~, '_".' __ - ,,",, ---,.,,-~.._- ~~. "'--'-"-~-"-.' -- --.. ~_. ",,-........ ~..,--,.- ---. 8.·:PZ 85-92-- -" Request of Rojo Corporation to rezone -- .... .. ---.._ -- _ a_ portion of Lot 1R, Block 1, Walkers ..-----......---....-..-- Branch Add.ition,. from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off p'r~mise consumption. This property is located at the northwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Emerald Hills Way. "_ '_"'.'__"'-""'-'w.. """ "'-.T._~ Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. -_. -- -.- '----.-- -- - -.---.............".......-.-.... .. <.L..__..___...........________.... _ ___. --.- -..,----.---_. Joey Lichunstein came forward to represent Rojo Corporation. He said this would be a clean, well run :Qperation and ~hey meet all the qualifications. ._. -0 ____..._ ',--- Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request_to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-92 APPROVED Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 85-92. This motion was seconded by _Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried ---S-o--.: ..- -- Request of Richmond Bay Devel . rezone Tract D, Meadow es Addition, from its present ssification of R-1 (Single Fa' to 0~1 (Office Dis This property is located n the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive and bounded on the south and west by Meadow Lakes Addition. 9.- PZ 85-93- -- ..... ....- - .... _..,- This request was withdrawn prior to the meeting. "-- r: " ( . KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. "- CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 30, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-92 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-1 TO IC-1 SUI REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 115 ',-- We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~ .~ Rl~HAJ.{U . ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development -- Zoning Review PZ 85-92 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 1\ \/ '~ Folsom Investments. Inc. Bent Tree Tower, Suite 800 16475 Dallas Parkway Dallas, Texas 75248-2661 (214) 931-7400 July 11, 1985 Mr. Red Coleman Red Coleman's 7560-A Greenville Avenue Dallas, Texas 75231 Re: Harwood Plaza Shopping Center North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Sir: '- Please let this letter serve as our authorization for you to proceed with application for a Special Use Permit in order for you to sell beer in your convenience operation within our Harwood Plaza Shopping Center. Sincerely, FOLSOM-McMILLAN JOINT VENTURE, FOLSO INVESTMENTS, INC., MANAGING PARTNER RWK/ck '~ ''-... ORDINANCE NO. 1277 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE /11080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-92 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-1 to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. The following described tract or parcel of land being a portion of Lot 1R, Block 1, Walkers Branch Addition, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas according to the revised plat recorded on Page 1 of Volume 388-180 in the Tarrant County Plat Records and being more particularly described as follows: '-- BEGINNING North 45 degrees 14 minutes West a distance of 78.13 feet and South 44 degrees 46 minutes West a distance of 113.48 feet from an iron rod at the Southeast corner of said Lot lR and the intersection of the West R.O.W. line of Emerald Hills Way with the North R.O.W. line of State Highway No. 26; THENCE South 44 degrees 46 minutes West a distance of 60.0 feet; THENCE North 45 degrees 14 minutes West a distance of 40.0 feet; THENCE North 44 degrees 46 minutes East a distance of 60.0 feet; THENCE South 45 degrees 14 minutes East a distance of 40.0 feet to the place of beginning and containing 2400 square feet of land. "-- Page 2 '-- ,,~ This property is located at the northwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Emerald Hills Way. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF AUGUST, 1985. ~tl~ CHA1RMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-92 IS HEREBY REZONED C-1-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION THIS 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. ',,--- MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '--- ( \ L I ! L CITY OF NO~RTH RICHLAND HILLS, ( Planning and Deve~o,.ent 9/9/985 Department:Q<>uncil MeetIng Date: Zoning Application ',' pa-r¢l1man Street and Scru&&$iDr~ve, PZ 85-94 Subject: Agenda Number: Ordinance No. 1278atGTapevine Highway I' ' t L f I L This Zoning ApplicationisPl'e~ent~c10tl five eXisting:Lotr,:löcated on Parchman Street and Scruggs Drive north<ofGl'apeyineliighway. The reque~t~r~~oning is from C-1 Commercial to C-2 Commercial:., .~ep;u~ose for the proposedl'~4JtteBt is to allow the ' applicants to construct a eonstructio'11 equipment sales wareÞouse on the site. L The subject propertyconsists.C)ffi"¡e>:t.nc1ividual lots which Will Tequire replatting prior to any development. f L RECOMMENDATION: The Platining and Zoning Commission :bac~ended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-94. I I ¡ L '- L L L L L L ( L ! ~ í L Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Oper gBudget er --.....-- Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds AvaUable L e'l1z~ ead Signature . City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director L- Page 1 of 1 ) ('~>/~~~í I ,; I ~ rlhï~3~ I' ---:--1m4~ I ~ '../ ~;" . i f-H I' I' '-1 -11 =r-J I ~, '- - ~~ /lìfurrfrn~~~¡·"~:"7·" ¡:I ,ì : ' - ~ ~j-'~ ~~hT~~~~- ::;:::;:::;-(1 r-\ . I " I I I I f-- -4'1 I 1 I i I I - - ç--',- ~ ì I \ '\1 , - R::' ~ ;: I I ~ ~ 1 . T " .. .' I I. , , I , : 1- =8.\:~ ' I" I I ~r- - II I I LlLJ II I 1- II1I ~:-.¡: ~=\\\)~ 7[ T I i II fT1= = '- ..... ~\:í[7 u' 1_ IIII , - __ _ -. ¡ I I I ,J}TN. L,..l.[ _lJ._LL " , ., I, "L1L CIE7& ~ -d II J::. - 8~I í I I ~ I IT I I I ',..,...,... rrrr:trtlIB BIIIIIIIIJ · "1 'T!j i <Y~< - ffi T ¡ ~ : " ,I I I I I n· 2 1 I I I 1, -r I 7~~ J I, = --'--~ \! ì I I I I ! II I I I I I }--J I- t:i 1 I I I ~ .: I _ ~ - .' .. - T \, I =S t I I I ~ I 3: c- ~ '/ . 1t I ~IR ;;;;~~ I \>~'111 ~\¿ I R-7-M i / ~ I 11 I I =f- f-~ I I \ \);,$ ~~. ,to( ?ðY1"\: I - A~:Q·=Ë ~? "vR '~', '. ,\~. 'I! I V,/' C- NOIITM '\ _ l- . j r 1 I 11""- C-I == f-,- 'oCMUNO t::= - r- ~ ,/ '" \ I- '..IO, 'F ~ -., '" "¿¿¡~4-R I I ~ ~ r-- I ,I r! ~¢>'~I ~[ tl~ TTþ I T ~ I ·~F1~, "T~ç.~~ ~ ~ï§E ,I I == W=R~'¡'7 .J.. t;::;:: ~~ .~RJF y/' .-~/ CIvi. ío = = ~ r- f-- " .. C-I' , .......' R-,,-T := = I. mS1 ,/=. '" -I- -, i'\ - - I r -3 ~~~ ... ¡o.,.- , (t~....~ :: - 1'0 - . -'¡::õ I h...· ::{ r- I- ().(D./2t¡j:: TI ,-4~" .. C-2 -" C-t- V~~ . >( - 7-g-gS i ' 'C-~ 0 ! .~ II I II -r ~ ' t t3 '- ~ .1 I c- Tmr ~ T( ')./.:...¡' E3 ~~. C-2,--J I ....1/ P ~ 'lS-'1q. TI~ f-j 1 I _u..,.. /~ '-I - - ~ C To ~ j' II I' I ,II r 1II1 /, II I' ¡!: __ I-2 ,.~ ..¿jFRQ=.· JJFh I I- --< ::J:::¡'6;::. ~ <'§ 'V'} :y / ~ I- ~ ::g t:Þ.D- ~ - .¡:::. f::. JiTx" / I ¡ -=- V ~ -: ',a, ~,........ ~ ,,--Y'l I 'T ~ -:I I " '\... t>- ':Y'/ I Ii/' ~~ 1.1. ~:: 'r Ii "'/ I \;;7 .....;~_ ~ ~ r-"f- .~ I 1-,.1 'f-'f-+ II~{.A c ~ ."" "'¡' ~= -êJT í· '\ ....... r-t-- fi~] ¡ _01· I III : I I I 1111 I I. I I , ." w C~z~r/fi~ .'- -. 0 500 1000 1500 20 I~ Af~¡~ONING MAP O;--NORT~ / - l.J ' ...., - '"" '" ,'-- .(. . c/1 /7 .' a£' ,Æ/WAff./ , v MAYOR ADOPTED Fß¿7; V 19;1/ , (DA E , :E NO. 1085 0 R . 9l1~ION RLOCK, 'CHAIRMAN, PLANNING a ZONING Page 6 P & Z Minutes August 8, 1985 ( ',,-- 10. PZ 85-94 PZ 85-94 APPROVED 11. PZ 85-102 [ Request of Jim Warren, Carry Beck, & Gail Douglas to rezone Lots 3K, 4K, & part of Lots 3 & 4, Calloway Acres Addition, from their present classification of C-l (Commercial) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located north of Grapevine Highway, bounded on the west by Scruggs Drive and on the east by Parchman Street. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Carry Beck came forward. He said he and Mr. Warren are in business together and they wanted to move their business next door. He said they found they could not because of the zoning. Mr. Wood asked if they were changing their business. Mr. Beck said they were not. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-94. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 5-0. Consideration of Zoning Ordinance warehousing. Mr. Ro the warehouse use ained in C-2 zoning concerned the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council since there were so many mini warehouses going in. He said they requested he draft a change to take warehousing out of C-2 and put in the industrial zoning classification. ''- ( r . KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. ''"- CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 30, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-94 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-1 TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 148 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ,~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ',,- Zoning Review PZ 85-94 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 w ~ ~ -<. ~ c t: ~ --.. ~r:>o FlORY \. 0 t r.. I i- " t.,.f ! 'n ¡,) -. '1 - " ~, g ~ ~ ~, ; J~. . ~' " ~ t .' ~ ~", i ~ --" - õ ¡ ~ ... " . , ¡. ÞR.. ... - 11\ .~ '.,. -- ... .... " ~ ~ ~ '- ~ '- \V AlUtAN',n V~JI1D (With JUIDt. SID11e awl Corporate Åckoow~&8) ,. -1'0'. No. ___...... STATE OF TEXAS, ~ " County of $1(:.11... ~ Know All Men By These Presents: TARMNT That Kr\RREN INVJ!:a'DŒl~T COMPANY, a '1'exa8 oorporatloD" acting herein by and through its duly authorized attio.r., of Bdar County, Teul, for and in conaidcraûoQ of the .UID of Ten and nO/100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dol1~r. and other valuable coDlideratioD to it cash in hand paid by the Grantee her_fter named, the receipt of which it hereby ackDowiedgec1 '-' . . have GRANTED, SOLD and CONVEYED, and by thcl>c pre.ent' do GRANT, SELL and CONVEY uaco C. L. DOUGLAS and wite, GAIL DOUGLAS ........."":........ ..... fa.: ...... l·tltI~ of Tarrant . .au.. COunty~~~~:,orTëba.~....~ the following described real estate, together with aU ilÇrovementa thereon, IÏtuated in- B_¿CcIÛ1ty, Topua, -.. 'V~. ' being more particu¡¡rly described a. follows, to-wit: ". ) ~ .... ~ 'Ç).V ~~. ~- Two tracts of land out of and part ot Lots Three (3 and Fo~:.(4) t A;tt i;:"-': CALLOV~AY l\CRES, in Tarrant County, Texas, desoribed by mete&.:~h4 1)ouìi~p':':Y"' f 11 to it. .. ./"'." ...... ~ as 0 ows, -w . .... ". ...:...... '.. ..' Tract 1: BEGINNING at a point in the East line of Soruggs D~1~ej-~~1d point being the ::)outhwest corner of said Lot 3; THENCE North alonsutlle East line of Scruggs Drive, passing the property line of Lots 3 and 4 at 144 feet, 160 feet to a'point; THENCE East 125 teet to a point; THENCE ::.>outh 160 feet to a'i"p~nt in the South line ot said Lot 3; THENCE West alon~ the ~outh line of said Lot 3, 125 teet to the point ot beginning. 'Eruct 2: lWGJNNIHG at fl poi.nt in the West line of Parchman street, )0 feet North and 14.5 feet West ot the Southeast corner ot said Lot 4; TIfENCE North along the West line of Parohman Street 80 feet to a point; TIi~NCE West 125 feet to a point; THENCE South 80 teet to a point; 'rHENCE ~ast 125 feet to the point ot beginning. '1'0 HAVE AND TO HOLO the above described premises, together with 'aU and .ingular the righta and appulteuam:es thereuuto ill anywise belonging unto the ¡¡aid GranteeS, their grantor oorporation does heirs or assigns, forever. And / èo. hereby bind itself its 4IiMr , ' ~~QI;,jþ.o;wJ~w.ö6, succel>sor. and a.signs, TO WARRANT AND FOREVER. DEFEND aU and .ingular the said premises unto the said Grantees herein, their heirs, a.,iglll and succeasora, .,aÌDIt every perlon whomsoever lawíully claiming or to claim the lame or any part thereof. .EXECUTED this r-:::'·~'l'T1!;~~:V#. -~. - 'Ll,k±.[ 24th day of May , A. I).. 1961. ~~--~. -- ,. ....... }!.~'\.~- LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE "'-, I /2.5 ï;,. ßO· 41< 80· " " ." '--.,... CI...() , ,", v .3k Qif', -, N ! 1 ' /4' 1'1' '/ 2. LOT Sï¿ETCI-I LOT.5 SF:. ~L¡.jC. C¡Q¿.LOWAY AC12ES AODN. MJet/:.¡ '\X '---" Mayfield REALTORS - APPRAISERS 1908 CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE "A" BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . . 267-2444 (METRO) 283-0841 PLAT SHOWING :~llrvcy of a p.:lrt of Lobì 3 ~¡nd 4, CALLOWAY ACRES, being an Addi tion to ~ he Ci ty of fort Worth, (no....' in lh(' Ci ty of North Richlùnrl Hills), Tarrant - ~l~ounLy, Texa~; accordinq to the Plat recorded in Volume 1481, Page 285, iJl'CÙ rÜ'corùs of T.:lrrant County, Tc.'xds and described by metes and bounds cI ~.; ! 0 11 ow ~ : UEGINNING at an iron roù in the West line of Parchman Street, said iron bl..: i. fie¡ 14.:J l(~c t ~ves t f I-om Lhe :,ou theas t corner of said Lot 3: TIIENCl: WC'~ t 12 tj . 0 [eet along the Sou th line of Lot 3 to an iron rod for corner; TIIENee North, pas:;inq the North line of Lot 3, the South line of Lot ·1 at H4. 0 fCt,t, in ..l11 2')4.0 [cr·t to an iron rod for corner; '1'¡¡I:N\.·J: J:d:jl I:~~.O fC'('l to ;¡n iron r'Oll in t.he West line of Parchman :;lr('ct: '¡'IIENC!: :;O\1t1. donq the ~'il'st line of P;¡rchm'-ìn Street, passing the South J In\' u!' ; ,)t ·1, thC' NOt-Lt-) 1 inC' of Lot '3 Lit 110.0 feet, in ù11 254.0 :Cl'l tü thc' >L..Icc~ of BC\Jl.nnjnc¡. "- E.A-.~T _5 O' o O' ~ ú) N \ \ \ ~ I. t- ~ o 2 '- ~ - o· "'" E. ~ T -... -:L OF 1;. · ... \ ': ï§i' ~..,. ." l "wo;.' "':"'1 , "..' '..IS' , ...: . e,. , ,. . . -, .. . ..... . . . . . ....:. ... \ "2.& ~ :.,N 0- ---'j O' ¡() o' t- ~ W to uJ ('I ~ ~ I ... Õ tP 2 4- ~ :! (J OJ 4- 0.. " ..q "¢ ~. O' q. "'''I' PI.t "-~" " . trw. tor-rfit 1M ."",rete re,,.,_tltlOft of "" pr'ONrty 11 dlPt.,..,,..d b)' ,urwI"" t..., 'tN' IN ..,...,t_1 of 'It. prop,"" HH\Q U '"dh.ted b)' th. "et. the S'It. locltl"" 1M b.. of b",11ðttlQ\ .",t 1.pl"Ov_nt, .,.. " ,Þo.n. ,II t.,u'Ow-..U Nt", .fthln tp.. bOund.r1n of the pro"rt)', ..,..,t Ai \NJwft. I.t twin, ,... th. property ¡ ,,,., th. d1H.nc" tnd'elt". and t,,1t tM "flu",. ,,. th. .....,..u Inl.",.( t Inq ",...t or F"O.d h n ,..... Oft U1d 'III, l"-e,...,... no tNr"O'l."-nh. CClnflh;U, prot"",., or ~,...t ......nt'. ta...,t U \ftown." O......................./RON ROD -x 1.-...... ....FENCE L 'NE -7 £-..........UrILITy LINE . T. W. BARROW. ,.. ................ .........., ""0". 19 9 4 /9:, ~ ~. . .'.0..1 , ð;··!!'.U"~·';;"'-. . ...'C··..··ð~".. ',~ SUT',.' ........,.- , , /1, , /þ ì..l, (A.l."d~g< i-' DATE' (ê - \ ~ ·ðS T.W. BARROW REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR 1614 NORTH BEACH STREET FORT WORTH, TEXAS 16/1/ 831- 3743 SCALE' ,".: 40 0554 L ORDINANCE NO. 1278 ',,-- AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE /11080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-94 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l to C-2. ..... PARCEL I BEING two tracts of land out of and part of Lots 3 and 4 of Calloway Acres, in Tarrant County, Texas, described by metes and bounds as follows: Tract 1: BEGINNING at a point in the East line of Scruggs Drive, said point being the Southwest corner of said Lot 3; THENCE North along the East line of Scruggs Drive, passing the property line of Lots 3 and 4 at 144 feet, 160 feet to a point; THENCE East 125 feet to a point; THENCE South 160 feet to a point in the South line of said Lot 3; THENCE West along the South line of said Lot 3, 125 feet to the point of beginning. Tract 2: BEGINNING at a point in the West line of Parchman Street 30 feet North and 14.5 feet West of the Southeast corner of said Lot 4; THENCE North along the West line of Parchman Street 80 feet to a point; THENCE West 125 feet to a point; THENCE South 80 feet to a point; THENCE East 125 feet to the point of beginning. - "--- PARCEL II Survey of a part of Lots 3 and 4, Calloway Acres, being an Addition to the City of Fort Worth, (now in the City of North Richland Hills), Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Volume 1481. ~age 285. Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod in the West line of Parchman Street, said iron being 14.5 feet West from the Southeast corner of said Lot 3; THENCE West 125.0 feet along the South line of Lot 3 to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North, passing the North line of Lot 3, the South line of Lot 4 at 144.0 feet, in all 254.0 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE East 125.0 feet to an iron rod in the West line of Parchman Street; THENCE South along the West line of Parchman Street, passing the South line of Lot 4, the North line of Lot 3 at 110.0 feet, in all 254.0 feet to the place of beginning. "--- Page 2 '- This property is located north of Grapevine Highway, bounded on the west by Scruggs Drive and on the east by Parchman Street. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF AUGUST, 1985. Avill ~ CHA1RMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION = (f2S7¡¿t2 I' ~ ZONING C ISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-94 IS HEREBY REZONED C-2 THIS 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS "-- ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~, 4., r t , L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS r Department: Planning andDC!velopment L '-subject: Request for. ~illboåt."dS:lgti Approval Council Meeting Date: 9/9/85 Agenda Number: SO 85-11 ¡ L Pilgrim Mini~WaréhoUse South Loop 820 i.... The accompanying requestþas<beett_.déby Carlisle Outdo()rIllc. . They wish to construct a billboard sign of 672.quarefee1:~n. the west side ·of LOQP8200n Lot 2 Block 10 Richland Heights AdditiQll_ '., Thetfac~currently contains a..int"'warehouse project belonging to Pilgrim Min~....W,reÞouse\Corporation. TheIJign,isproposed to be located along the north propert:ylineof.t:hetract 25 feet\ba.ckfromtÞestreet frontage. This would place the proposed $ign approx:lmately 250 feet l101¡'thof the adjacent church property and some 2250 feC!t.north of the nearest exis.t1.ngbillboard sign. The property on whichtb.ebi¡l~oat'dis.proposed to be placedi,currently zoned PD Planned Development. Th:lszonin8\isacarry-over from tÞe\pre",iousZoning Ordinance when a mini-warehouse project FeqtSireda specific SitePlanapp;roval. However, neither that earlier ordinance.n()r tftepre.s·~tordinance require a tþe location of the proposed signs be shown on the approved Sit:ePl,an. r---" I , L ( L f f , L- L RECOMMENDATION: The Staff hasdete~1.Iìed that theproposedbil1board sign meets all the criteria in the ordinance for t:he location and constructiotlatidmay be approved if the City Council chooses. i.... I I ì .... .... f L , t L .... L ¡ t ! . L.- I ¡ L Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) g Budget - Finance Review Acct. ~umb.r Sufficient Funds Available - , L . tlV~ Signature' City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 '-- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SIGN PER}IIT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST "- PERMIT NUMBER TYPE OF SIGN OFr ?/?RÞ("S..e ( '6;d&Util^) DATE NAME OF APPLICANT/BUSINESS t A7tL ·.'ÞJ ~-Id~ ~,,~. tJ /2'/ A-J- I , ' , ADDRESS 1:1:1 "/0 -:T.-v t.:JDOÅ L:>A //".s . /;( 7'::>~';'./ PHONE dIe¡" 9'1/. / '7// . LOCATION OF SIGN '?Zo JJ. ~ tt.úú;.lú:J bil .~.. ì::/t¡1?""M /tl'd.' t:)JII,7;!.1dJ./ SIGN LOCATION ON LOT ¡.{i/?'lft. tr.i.IÒ ~ ~ /P.M ¡t{,Äk' UA1?;l.øq~ ..700 I ~7_ ßk,eL NAME OF CONTRACTOR l/9';¡ 7 ~ ~ (lD. . ADDRESS ?I IJM7£ PHONE WIDTH OF LOT FACING QUAlIFYING STREET cJ rlo I' SIGN TAKING UP PARKING SPACE(S) YES NO __' BLOCKING FIRELANES YES "-- NO V' ESTIMATED SIGN VALUE $ ';;0 000 . PERMANENT OR BILLBOARD FILING FEE $50.00 + ESTIMATED COST WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURE OR LAND TO WHICH OR ON WHICH THE STRUCTURE IS TO BE ERECTED OR SIGN TO BE PAINTED. YES ~NO -- *************************************************************************** THE UNDERSIGNED AGREE TO CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE SIGN ORDINANCE #1001, 1-24-83" AND OTHER ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, AND ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITI~~~OR ERECTING THIS SIGN. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ~ ib APPROVED BY DATE SIGNED ~ /2'I/<¡?c- APPROVED DATE I PLEASE ATTACH ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO THE BACK OF THIS FORM. ',,-- bl S~I~'~12CV E..t~ Í1z~~SU;fè- - .--.-.", -- 1:- èi ~ .. ... :>\ ~ lID , - ~1 ~ ~ ;y '" Ù\ '.. ':t;::. ~r, \:) Cb......., Ct ~ ,~ . ;; ....... ......... .; (jJ ~ ~ IQ' ~ ;)- 1>1 ..... !J) '-- - 4 , . . , ., t 1 ~ - f , . .~ .'C: -J '-- J .... :zr')¡ ~.\) ::::~ ~;) ."" Q "b'" '<) " .' 1.0 " ;;; '-"t () Ò ~, " ~;) "'II'. :'b '-"t ::I !() ~ /O'/éS c-, ésrn" ~ . ~ Vo/3;''''' Fg r; 72). ~ ~ :--··¿·.,b....lh-- .- -í~?f¿~L-~ . I--=-=·-~-~- _ _ .. _ _ L _ . J ,(I' / . ~ "" .1 ® .. '" ::: 10 '.0 ..... ... -:. I;) ;.: ,: .. ~ ~ --- --" . .-=1 ~=; Z .,. , .. ~I -I '0, , ~ .... ---.----- - KEETER DR. I., 1>' o <:) ~. ~ .... ø o " ÖI <2 3'. :) 5' ~I .---. . ".. /~ " :b ~ ~ ~; '\ i \.\ ~ ~ "- ~ 3 , I l·:_· ~ -J,~ u-:s' C)C1Io'O -< . U) c.j ~ ~t:. -..... -0 '::IC\' U;-:S~ .Jc>~ <. -. -. ~~~. þ.~ \1'\J\Ì,j> ():> C. _. ~\J\U\ - _-:f -0 c-- C) ~ ~u \).) ~ " \1'~'V ~.......... ~ , };. I\..~ ... I\. " '" " ~ ...; ':. "- .... '" II, .'" .~ ... \, '\:0' ~~ --"...~:...\ ··''''·_«'d_.... '(: ······.0...- _ _ ~.~ ~ ~ \.) .0 'R. _\:~ _ .. -~G , ~ ~ ~ . .. } ~ t~'J ~.~ ~ "<.' c.., "'Þ......~ 4· ,~ ~ ~'~ i .~, - -~ ~ -~ í ... ~ { 0'Ò \)~ OJ l-- Q lÎ /'- ~. ':( ". ~ ~ ~ r:)~ -:» ') sS 1- c) I --I l\1 I . , ' ... ~ :- ~:~ '. '" - '. . - Q~~ ~ . . 'i. . ~"',~'::: 1\'~~<:)6 "I~::~.",,:" ::~ . .~'" ..'" . a. .'" ~ " J ., .~ lei , "I, ~ (j ... .. I I I I I I I 'ì".. I I~.... I ~~ , I ~~ I ..Z$ (.t) --........... I...~ \::.\ . I~~ 'š- I '3 I:)-;.y -.........-- " I~ I ,'), , ::I I~ I I I , I I I I I I I ~r r," I I I I I I I I ~ ..... '" 0° 2> u- (7')... ~ ~ ~- Ò. Ç> ..... ~ =---" VI ...... c..3 VI ,~~ ~ 'tI ~~ Oò.'" ........\ Q.f) ~ -. , ~. ~r·_. ~ L rl A}/ 11/./ 1 ~ ,1." ~ / f{/' August 21, 1985 Ms. Jeanette Moore City Secretary City of North Rich1and Hills P.O. Box 18609 N. Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Ms. MOQre: Purpose of this letter is to request that we, at Carlisle Outdoor, Inc., be granted an appearance before the City Council of North Rich1and Hills for the purpose of applying for a billboard permit. The location we intend to apply for is on Loop 820 between G1enview and Booth-Calloway Drive, more precisely described as Pilgrim Mini-Warehouse tract. Engineering plans and the sign location were submitted with the written permit request on August 21, 1985. I would appreciate it if you could notify me of the next City Council Meeting, or possibly when we might appear on the agenda for the next meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. ~Àb Stan Ha 11 SH/prb 1 " l 1 ~ 1,-- ..... i CARLISLE OUTDOOR, INC. 12340 Inwood Road· P.O. Box 802636. Dallas, Texas 75380-2636' 214/991-1911 48-0 (Pl'(WOOD FACE) -<' ..______._~.,~ u~ .. '..~.... ~'" ,., , "..~~. ... 14~~ ~ ~~';t---'Z,<. - ~-~t~l..: 3 - -L~ -(. - I I . Cil -;a;----- ..--- , , , " VE~T\CAL PI PE. CoL. 10 I':"':"~¡ ß£. LEANE..D Ýic:." PER F';;;.)T Nf ¡~ fo~ DEAD LOAD DE>·-LE(.T. -! 1. ~ 12!3 ~r==- .. .t --;fiiÏ,f r-; I 1?:11~, I:;¡~ I r I t ~Fbl ~ °1 ' ¡JI~ì -III .. ~I il 'j _ lyre --·-----..·-PIPE~·$ -F66-TI N¿~----s-ë HEOÜ LC r I , CEN G: ----..--~·---~-----;L-: -'-- -- ~L L;~ . \:JIND ~. \ R Mou NI" l )1.___ , c~._.._._,._.._~~.._ HAG L I- Q::>\ I N ~ c.., ~ ¡-; !',.L..... I ¡ . . . · LoAD P I p~ 5 :lE DE [::J)\ D\ ~.M. pt PE ~\ZE D::: PTH E' ~~,\ A""':-' :--- 3 3C í's¡:-3cÞ', ,~75" lCD' 4J '0" c:: 'S _ o -r:~ 0 35 ,.., I', ...... -; _.. ~-~"'--:..._._,._. ~..;.. ¡ .:s.~':...:.:.~ \7' -r- ~ n ..., A I I 3() 50', ;+~. 171 ::~;-::;t H k H !Je, 30 - 35 3S 3~', .5orJ I 'r-~- -0" "__ __ L I i 30 ~.¡;')t .4~<:S 17t~·~ä" _t-," 35-40' 35 ~2.>.~,·r,'õ \a'..,~,,· -- 5',1',)" I 4 t -L' ,- ~ -~ 0 ~ ¡...;- ::_>-----1='-- -- -~---! I /I (' - 4 51 i 3.:> 3io', .:='(~:)" , 1'- 'Õ' I '= ',,"< II .- =r ____, .... ~_ .__ _n_~ L- r\ "1 J 1:35 ,1'0' '4-='71 I'"' ~ I .--: .. ( ~I'- I -r..J v -;.-J ::; - ..:J I - ." ,:::. I IIi I <~-- ., . - I" ., ':;¡; -0 " ".; , - r," ¡---- ~1'~' - F: 1== I,' 'I' < 4 c:: 5 I ,3·') .k: ¿,I ~ - - ~ I ..J' .~ 3S ..'f.'~'. ·:-:':1 Iê)":' -+ ;,,-~~----¡--------·-t--_·_-~_... ------! 5r~:L I 3 4 .. ~ ...., ~ -,' r-"I ~ II ' f . I' ~ I I ~ ¡ 2- > ..-+33, , r - :.J ! I --(~ , .'. i! . ¡ I 50 55. ! ¡ I', - 3S 4~"~ .5 oe1 ,";,1_- r " I e:/-Q'I t , ..) I i ~ I ~ --- ¡- 3--, ¡ 4(:"" :::')':1 I; '-::; ! ~' ,. I ;. ! .' 'J ! 55- ;' , '- -- .-' ~) N I , ;J -.- i .- " '.'> 35 I I , T . 42·" ,~(0::! .:r-:)' , /::;'·0" t- T I ¡ t--...-- ~ ¡ ./)' .3~ ! 4~"( .4::¿" I Ib'-:) ," c" &'Q-1 O· J I ¡ ..., ~ - ; 4b"t .5oj'L~~~:j" _-1 8 '.()- I i ... -. ...- --- --------- ·r -¡~...~-'.-;.:,~t~~~':'-~..~~·..· : . . t,; ~ " 'r ',,- w v < 1L t) . ~ J-- 1--' I 1 '-. -( ¡ I I ¡ , ¡ .....i¡ ·f ~I 'J Ii f i ; ~f~¡, o I uJ 2:,....2i a..;.j cillO. Q'~ '"-I 1 , - ~:~4~~ .:.:.~~7Â- 10. -. ->i I -----11- I - " JI ' ~ >,,; ~- . --r--- , ~ -- L'-- ~ -=-=, rt------- ..... 'Ì" 'N A L. \0( W A'(...J ,47- S (TI FFEN) ......... ',¿--~ --r', I ¡ II II II , I t, , ! __ i ~''*'¢ Roo BRAŒ,/";! . .--- ""-.... 'I ~/ I " / .. ¡ ! I ! , / 'v' . // '",- Î / I, / II _______11__./ _ _._ -=-=-==-iV _ _______ _ , I u ~ l' ~I oJ I I!I Jû-<-- STEt; ~ ·Lt....()D~R. T C3~5' I'-fULL FLAG PIPE C'L.U''''\l''J I ~ ~ ~ t~ ; ]:~: ::~ :~~~,- .: ::- _1 I. ~/ .- . ----- .' --'- - ! 1e;L- ~! _ë.¿~ s;,L Tilt" -;.:~ . I I / r L~ ~7- ..~~- ì ril ~/ :¡LJ,r -L-- 'I "/' I r I ,J /un I ,.;1 , r ~ 'b::dJ I...DIA ..I o C. E.~,jT:'r. -,"'\ ',.' U N ~ 5/¡ ¡¿," '" I' - 0" ... . ~ ____.. ~6-_.'___. ___..__ ...._ __., ----.. ---. -. -_._-~.....- --- -.....--.....- ._-- : I , 1 I' ! , :._---- , I ,.. .'" - ~i L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: GN 8S-82 9/9/85 Subject: RESOLUTION 85..,.20.Cei'tifiedTax Roll L The "Truth-in-Taxation" of Chapter.26<of the Texas Prø,e~tyTaxCod.e requires that the Chief Appraiser of the tQJtingdistriç.1:supply each taxinsunitwi.thin that county with certified totals of alla~raised,"'alues within that tax unit. Mr.. Nelson Eichman, Chief Appraiser of the TarrantA.ppraisal District, has subtnitted totals of appraised values to the City of North RichlandHills for our review. The Net Taxable Value is <$1,138,91S,489. That value is $6,718,196 lower than the value presented to the Cit,yCo\1ncilin.tbe .l985-86 budget process.. Thé..difference :l.sthe lower value of properties currentlY'-111der.p:.()test to the Apprai8~lRe"iew Board. Those properties will be listed onasubse,,,,,ent tax roll afterf1nalreview. The subsequent tax roll will be a minimum of $1,145,633.685, including thentinimumvalue of the protested property. I L { \ L r I ¡ L I L r i L L ì L L L L L L L L L RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation thattheCi~yaccept the Net Taxa'61e Value of $1,138,915,489. ,~ ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev:) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number. N/~ ----,. Sufficient undsAvaHable ..xL.:. ' i.e~ 7JY1..~~ .~ .'--'< ~~ilif7~ Department HeadSlgr'lature ' I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of "- RESOLUTION NO. 85-20 WHEREAS, the City Council of this City received the Ad Valorem Tax Rolls for the year 1985 from Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of net taxable value of $1,138,915,489 plus current net taxable value of properties under protest; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Rolls and approved same on September 9, 1985. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hill, Texas, that: 1. The approval of said Tax Rolls received from Tarrant Appraisal District in August, 1985, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall collectively be considered the Tax Roll of this City for 1985 and it is hereby in all things adopted and approved. Passed and approved the 9th day of September, 1985. ."'"'-- Dan Echols-Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis-City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire-Attorney -- ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~I L D rt t Finance epa men: Council Meeting Date: 9/9/85 Subject: RESOLUTION 85-19, AUtttc:î*i.J::l.tl.g Ad Valorem TaxExemp~ion.' Agenda Number: GN85-83 r I L r·~ , í ì L During the budget processforf1.sca1.Jrear 1985-86,Ci~tiCC:>\tpè.iliñstructed the staff to prepare the operating bb~getassUming an increase in~t1~~e'.t'/65and the Disabled Citizens exemptions from $15,000~~<$25,000t and to maintainth_i~~e""'liHomestead exemption at 10% or a minimum of $5, OOOfqral1. owner occupied residentsofi~~r.t::h tlichland Hills. The attached resolution gran~~.those exemptions. By state law;tt_pwnet"resident may not have both the over/65 and theD'$sabl_drCitizen exemption. The cwnerresident must choose which exemption. L r ¡ L L r - L r" ! L r L r- I ....... f L r i..... RECOMMENDATION r' Approve Resolution 85-19 granti¡;tgexe111þtions. L I L r- ì L L [ Source of Funds: Bonds (GOlRev,) Operating Budget Other, - Finance Review Acct. Number N I A SUflct~ÌI Avall$bte , ~.:; , City Manager . Fin.nte Director -XX- i i \.- ~ ~~..,. Î' ., Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ...:.JI Page 1 Of "- RESOLUTION NO. 85-19 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. There shall be exempt from the City Ad Valorem Taxes for the year 1985, ten per cent (10%) (with a minimum of $5,000) of the assessed value of residental homestead within the City which is occupied by the owner as his homestead. 2. -.. Persons over the age of 65 years, claiming an exemption pursuant to Ordinance No. 676 shall have a $25,000.00 exemption from the assessed value of a residential homestead. A person who is disabled within the meaning of Section 11.13 (m) of the Property Tax Code of the State of Texas, as of January 1st of each year shall be entitled to a $25,000.00 exemption from the assessed value of property owned by such disabled persons and used exclusively for homestead purposes by such disabled person. No person may claim both the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption and no homestead shall be subjected to both the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption. 3. Persons claiming the exemptions must comply with the City Ordinances and Texas Property Tax Code. PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of September 1985. Dan Echols-Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis-City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: "- -- Rex McEntire-Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS LI L Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 9/9/85 Agenda Number: GN85-84 Subject: ORDINANCE 1279.. LeVYin¡.a'l'ax Rate I L [ ! L The attached Ordinance set$the 'l'ø.Xø.lilte at 33.5¢ forBudgetYe~rJ1985-86. r- ¡ i L ['- L , ,> ( L f ~ L r . I I L L r ¡ L r L r 1 '-- RECOMMENDATION í 1 L Approve Ordinance 1279. f L f L Finance Review Souroe of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other .n....-- - ¿ -m~~'V~ Acct. Number > N I A SU~Ic~nd4! Available . ~2· . :Æ ~ Department Head Signature· I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ~ . Finance Director Page, 1 qf '- ORDINANCE NO. 1279 AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS FOR THE YEAR 1985 BE IT ORDAINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS THAT: We, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills do hereby levy or adopt the tax rate on $100 valuation for this City for tax year 1985 as follows: $ .197 for the purposes of maintenance and operation. $ .138 for the payment of principal and interest on debt of this City. $ .335 Total tax rate. The tax assessor-collector is hereby authorized to assess and collect the taxes of the City of North Richland Hills on this 9th day of September, 1985. ----- 1. - That there is hereby levied and shall be collected as provided by law an ad valorem tax for the year 1985 on. all property, real and personal, except such property as may be exempt from taxation by Constitution and the statutes of the State of Texas, and ordinances and resolutions of the City of North Richland Hills situated within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on January 1, 1985, and that the amount to be applied to the value of such property shall be 33.5¢ per $100.00 valuation. 2. -...... That the tax so levied and assessed shall be apportioned to the accounts and funds in the amount as set forth above. Collections of taxes levied shall be deposited to the credit of each of the above accounts and funds in their proportionate share of the total levy and after taking into consideration a three percent (3%) uncollectable factor which is to be accounted for in the General Fund. 3. That the taxes provided for herein are in accordance with the appropriate State statutes. - '-- 4. Ad valorem taxes levied by this Ordinance shall be due and payable on October 1, 1985, and shall become delinquent on the first day of February, 1986. Payment of such tax is due in one full installment. 5. If the tax is unpaid after February 1, 1986, such tax will become delinquent and penalty and interest will attach and accrue as provided by the Statures of the State of Texas including Articles 1060a and 7336, V.A.T.C.S. 6. In the event the taxes become delinquent and in the event such delinquent taxes are referred to an attorney for collection, an additional amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the total amount of tax, penalty and interest then due shall be added as collection costs to be paid by the taxpayer. 7. Taxes herein levied and uncollected shall be a first prior and superior lien against the property, and the said lien shall be superior liens, charges, and encumbrances, and such lien shall attach to personal property with the same priority as to real property. 8. The lien provided herein shall be attached as of January 1, 1985. 9. Should any section provision or clause of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. 10. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its approval and adoption as provided by law. '---.... '--- '- Passed and approved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, upon first and final reading, at a regular meeting on the 9th day of September, 1985. Mayor-Dan Echols ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis-City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire-Attorney ¡ I I L.. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS r I L.. Department: Finance COuncil Meeting Date: 9/9/85 Agenda Number: GN85-85 SUbject: ORDINANCE 1280, Adopting )ù.dget FY 1985-86 ¡ L f ¡ L The attached Ordinance i"i~hefinal step in the budget pro<;easfor.fiscal year 1985-86. It is a summary of all funds operating revenues and proposed.e"penditures. f I i L- ,. I L ! I , L- ¡ L L I' I i L ¡ L L RECOMMENDATION r L Approve Ordinance 1280 ad.opt:f.ì'lgprOpos.ed Operating B1.u:lgetfor fiscal year 1985-86. r - L r I , L r L Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget A- Other 2. '7iÎ.....,:.... Department Head Sign,ture ' . CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number N/A Sufficient F nds Available L , Finance Director -. ~ City Manager Page 1 of ¡" "',,, , ·~·.,·:.'·.'i,' .\' ' ''''''''',,',W' 'r'" "-- ORDINANCE NUMBER 1280 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND APPROVING A BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER 1ST, 1985 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30TH, 1986 WHEREAS, an annual operating budget for the fiscal year October 1, 1985 through September 30, 1986, has been prepared by the City Manager for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and WHEREAS, said budget has been presented by the City Manager in accordance with the City Charter, and WHEREAS, public notices of a hearing upon this proposed budget have been published as required, and the public hearing held on said budget, and it is the consensus that the budget, as submitted and amended, should be approved, to wit: FUND RECOMMENDED BUDGET AMENDED AND ADOPTED BUDGET TOTAL REVENUE (General Fund) $ 8,855,286 $ 8,855,286 EXPENDITURES: DEPARTMENT I City Council City Manager City Secretary Legal Civil Service Finance Planning & Development Municipal Court Library Public Works Parks & Recreation Police Fire Non-Departmental GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 58,950 58,950 181,236 181,236 109,403 109,403 45,000 45,000 64,337 64,337 851,132 851,132 443,353 443,353 158,081 158,081 358,256 358,256 1,356,792 1,356,792 451,059 451,059 2,618,809 2,618,809 1,915,878 1,915,878 243,000 243,000 $ 8,855,286 $ 8,855,286 $ 1,585,748 $ 1,585,748 $10,441,034 $10,441,034 TOTAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL GENERAL FUND AND DEBT SERVICE FUND EXPENDITURES ------ ',-- ORD INANCE NO. Page Two 1280 FUND RECOMMENDED BUDGET AMENDED AND ADOPTED BUDGET UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND Water Sewer Interest Income & Misc. $5,507,750 3,355,500 250,000 $5,507,750 3,355,500 250,000 TOTAL REVENUES $9,113,250 $9,113,250 EXPENDITURES Public Works/Utilities Finance/Utilities 8,670,982 439,060 8,670,982 439,060 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $9,110,042 $9,110,042 OCCUPANCY TAX FUND Undesignated Fund Balance 10/1/85 Revenue 52,500 78,000 52,500 78,000 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 130,500 $ 130,500 $ 130,500 - EXPENDITURES $ 130,500 PARKS & RECREATION CONTRIBUTION FUND Revenue $ 54,000 Expenditures $ 54,000 $ 54,000 $ 54,000 REVENUE SHARING FUND Revenues $ 124,382 Expenditures $ 121,000 $ 124,382 $ 121,000 THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills ratify, adopt and approve the budget as filed and amended for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1985 through September 30, 1986. - "-- ORDINANCE NO. Page Three 1280 PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City Council at a special meeting in the Council Chamber of the North Richland hills City Hall on the 9th of September 1985. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - Attorney - t L L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Department: Council Meeting Date: ORDINANCE 1281, Adopt:fugRevenue Sharing Budget for FY 1985/86 9/9/85 , Subject: Agenda Number: GN85-86 r i l A budget public hearing on Revenue Sharing Entitlements was hf!ldon Monday, AuguSt 26, 1985 at City Hall. CityCôUncil set Monday, September9.1~85 as the date for final budget adoption forfis~alyear 1985/86 Revenue SharingJSudget. L L ¡ L ( I , I L- L ¡ "- ¡ L L L RECOMMENDATION i L Approve Ordinance Number 12.81 L I L L Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating<Budget N/A 01~er~ )r¡~.~... .? Finance Review AcCt.Nurnber.. .. .N/A SU~fICI~ø~Avallable ···/~iljt;/:~ Department Head<$lgnature ' City Manager Ç/TYÇOtJNCIL ACTlONITfM , Finance Director L Pag, 1 <)f \....... ORDINANCE NO. 1281 WHEREAS, the City Council has held public hearings to determine the proposed use of Federal Revenue Sharing funds for the period of October 1, 1985 to September 30, 1986; and WHEREAS, after receiving public input and after considering all eligible uses the Council finds that the Revenue Sharing Budget Expenditures should be as set out below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The total anticipated revenues of the said budget are: $121,000. 2. The funds in said budget are appropriated for the following uses: --' a. General Government (Computer System) b. Public Safety (Fire Department Equipment) $ 67,000.00 54,000.00 $121,000.00 PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of September, 1985. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex Mc Entire - Attorney ~ U!" I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance COuncil Meeting Date: Agenda Number: GN85-87 9/9/85 '- ÞubJect: Ba:Í1kDepositoryContract ! L The comprehensive requestfot'bank depository bid forms were authorized by City Council at the August 12, 1985 counciLmeeting. The City's consultant, Mr. LeW1s.McLain's, evaluation is attached fof yoúr review. In summary his evaluation>i$ listed as follows. The City received bids fromAltiè4N~1:'theast,. Interfirst Bank,. and Texas Commerce Bank-Hurst. All three bank$s.1"faed .·~()perform allreque$t'edse~ices and to all points outlined in the RequestforP.;t'()})osa~. The focus of the,. analY'siswa.s ,therefore to weigh costs versus benefits of those, services compared to reve.ueSigenefated in excess of service fees. The City'.al1ersgeoperating cash requirètl1ettt1Jis.aliJsumed to be $';00,000 and those funds will be.in~ained in an interest bear:f:n.a..cpeckit1g account. That analysis is summarized'as fol16ws: L L I I L SOURCE OF INCOME OR EXPENSE INTERFIRST BANK ALLIED BANK TEXAS C~CE I I I ~ , L' Super NOW Checking Account Interest Earnings $ 26,250 (' $ 15,556 $ 18,000 Service Charges Account Maintenance LJ ~et Revenue (Loss) over Super NOW Interest Earnings 15,989 16,385 19,819 11,161 (829) (1,819) CD Rates greater than $100,000 20,228 (187,S()0) 37,500 Combined Net Increase in Earnings (Loss) $ 31,389 $ (188,329) $35,681 The assumption made on the SuperNQWDemand Accounts are based on each individual bank's definition of balances required. ...Intèrfirst Bank's bidhaS1:he.sreater return. The investment services are ..acomp.1:'isonotbid amounts in relation to what could be earned if we invested allourtll.()p~Jitsd.irectl.,. in Treasur.,.Bills. Only the difference in CD rates currently quoted0Jti1'1"JitliJtments compsredtoeacbi~d.ividual bid is considered. The bid of Texas Commerce Bank....Hurst na,s the greater retu,.;n on CD rates. For a more detailed analysis, please r.evie.,..M1,:'. McLain's attachedanatysis. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating8udget Other -------. Finance Review Acet. Number till A :.Funds Available . Finance Olrector N/A ~ '--'7fJ~.... .. ~- .... Department Head Stgnature --" ACTION ITEM I , U Page 1 Qf L LL L L L L RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation that the City of North RichlaJ1dHi1.1s award contracts to the following: \ 1. BankingSer"l,cés béawarded to Interfirst'Jank,North Richland Hills. 2. InvestmentSèrviç.~>^beawarded to Texa~ p01í1Du~rce bank ,for amounts in excess of the $6.7 million to be maintained in th~,Interfirst Banking I System. L L L L L L ¡ L L L L L Ll L CITYOP NORTH RICH1.ANQHILLS Lewis F. McLain, Jr. - Administrative & Fiscal Consulting Services 2300 Highland Village Road, Suite 240 Lewisville, Texas 75067 (214) 221-7591 I NTRODUCTI ON This purpose of this report is to explain the attached analysis of the submitted Proposals for Banking Services from InterFirst Bank, Allied Bank, and Texas Commerce Bank. Since all three banks agreed to perform all " requested services and to all points outlined in the Request for Proposal, the focus of the analysis is to weigh costs versus benefits. There are actually two parts to the proposals. One is to handle the City's operating monies, and the other is to handle part of the City·s investment monies. The format used to present the analysis is that of an income statement. The reason for using this concept is to show the net benefit/cost of the contract for each of the two years during the contract period. Revenues will be considered first. -. SOURCES OF INCOME Interest Paid on Certificates of Deposit. The City's average daily operating cash requirements will be $500,000. This is to meet demands for cash on a daily basis. The RFP calls for these funds to be in interest bearing accounts at all times. The remainder of the City funds can be invested in longer term instruments which will pay a higher rate of interest. Thus, the City will have large sums to invest since the combined operating and bond fund monies will exceed $25 million at peak times of the fiscal year. The City could, of course, invest directly in T-Bills since State law now provides for that priviledge. However, each bank was asked to submit its proposal based upon the rate it would pay on $100,000 Certificates of Deposit. Because cities can alternately invest in T-Bills, the rates paid by the banks were requested to be based upon T-Bill yields. The bank was asked to quote investment rates as basis points (100ths of 1%) added to or subtracted from the T-Bill yield for a comparable maturity length. The bank was to specify the maximum amount of CD's they could sell us. InterFirst had a ceiling of $1,500,000. The other two banks had ceilings of $15,000,000. The banks were told that investment monies would be spread evenly between the different CD maturity brackets. Therefore, $1,153,846 was allocated between the different brackets ($15,000,000 divided by 13 categories). InterFirst had $115,384.60 allocated between the 13 different categories. ($1,500,000/13). '- "- InterFirst also bid what is known as it's PAC Program. PAC is an acronym for Packaged Affiliate Certificates of Deposit. Each of InterFirst's 67 affiliates can sell us a $100,000 CO and have it insured by the FDIC. Thus, InterFirst can sell us $6,700,000 of CD's and have them protected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, eliminating the need to have collateral. This is a savings to the bank which can be passed on to us through the paflnent of higher interest rates. This is a new and innovative concept that is also being used by other banks that are part of a large bank holding company. The results are expressed as a benefit or lack of a benefit when compared to what we could earn if we invested all our monies in Treasury Bills. InterFirst bid rates that were from minus 15 basis points to minus 5 basis points on $1,500,000 and approximately plus 32 basis points on the $6.7 million PAC program. Allied bid a minus 125 basis points on all maturity brackets. Texas Commerce Bank bid a range of plus 5 basis points to plus 25 basis points. The net results were as follows: InterFirst, $20,228; Allied, minus $187,500; and Texas Commerce, $25,385. Benefits of Borrowing Funds from Banks. The second source of income is the benefit of borrowing up to $500,000 from the depository bank. Each bank quoted a rate based upon prime, which is now 9.5%. For purposes of analysis, the rate of 7.76% recently negotiated by the City in a lease agreement involving some equipment was used as a comparison. InterFirst and Allied bid 85% of prime and Texas Commerce bid 80%. As it worked out only Texas Commerce bid an equipment loan rate that would be lower than 7.76%. (9.5% x 80% = 7.6%). The benefit over a one-year period would be $457. Supernow Account Revenues. Finally, each bank was asked to bid a rate ',- they would pay on operating deposits. Also, they were asked to determine whether the bid was based upon the ledger balance or the collected funds (ledger balance less the float) balance. The ledger balance is expected to average $500,000 and the collected balance is expected to be 60% of that, or $300,000. InterFirst bid on the ledger balance and included a schedule that revealed their latest rate on SuperNow's as 5.25%. Allied included an analysis that was interpreted to be based on an average collected balance of $261,000, at minus 125 basis points off T-Bill yield. Since T-Bill yield is now 7.21%, 7.21%-1.25% is 5.96%. Texas Commerce bid on a collected balance of $300,000 at 6.00%. Since InterFirst bid on ledger balances, they had estimated earnings of $26,250 to the City. Allied and Texas Commerce had $15,526 and $18,000 in estimated SuperNow earnings respectively. Total Revenues. Earnings totaled $46,478 from InterFirst, and $43,842 from Texas Commerce. There were no revenues shown for Allied Bank since the proposed reduction in investment rates from T-Bill yield greatly offset the other revenue sources computed. EXPENSES The City clearly specified it wanted all items associated with the depository agreement to be charged by the bank and paid by the City. This was by design so the bank could be compensated for the services provided and so the investment rates could be viewed without the confusion of "free" services. The service categories relate to regular banking services, direct investment in securities services and safekeeping charges. '- - Account Services. The costs associated with the daily depository were bid at an individual rate per item. The volume of activity used in the analysis was determined by the Finance Director based upon current levels. The volume was extended by the rates to produce the following annual costs: InterFirst bid a total of $15,089, Allied bid $16,385, and Texas Commerce bid $19,819. These are competitive rates and compare with similar contracts in the metrop1ex. They do not include the cost of check printing which was bid at the bank's direct cost by each of the three banks. Securities Purchased. In the event the City wishes to invest directly in T-Bil1s, the proposal asked that the banks bid a price to execute each investment transaction. This consists of making three bids for rates and recording the results for the independent auditors to examine. The determining factor in the analysis was the transaction fee. Texas Commerce Bank bid $100 per investment block transaction. Allied bid $250 per block transaction. InterFirst bid $50 per $1 million. It was assumed the City would average two purchases a week, all done in one buying transaction. Texas Commerce bid $10,400 ($100 x 2 purchases x 52 weeks). InterFirst bid $2,600 ($50 x 1 purchase x 52 weeks). Allied bid $26,000 ($250 x 2 purchases x 52 weeks). Safekeeping Charges. The securities shall be held in a separate and different bank other than the Depository Bank. The bank has to provide the Finance Director with an original safekeeping receipt. The proposal allowed for a safekeeping receipt charge to be priced by the bidding banks. Texas Commerce Bank was the only one that submitted a charge for this service. The bid was for $10 per safekeeping receipt. Total Expenses. Total expenses were InterFirst, $17,689, Allied, $42,385, and Texas Commerce Bank, $31,719. - NET REVENUES The evaluation was made in ,accordance with the RFP guidelines. A critical assumption made was that the investments would be made evenly across the maturity brackets. Under this approach, the following net revenue numbers would result: InterFirst Bank, $28,789; Texas Commerce, $12,123; and Allied, a negative $214,329. It is only fair to add that the depository bids could be viewed in terms of how the City could maximize each one. For instance, since the City can invest directly in T-Bil1s, none of the minus C.D. bids would be used; the City would earn T-Bi11 yield as a minimum simply by investing directly in T-Bil1s. A second schedule is attached to show the differences in the bids under maximization assumptions. These changes result in the following net revenues: InterFirst, $30,001, Allied Bank, minus $26,829, and Texas Commerce Bank, $24,239. An analysis of the bids leads to the conclusion that the best overall strategy is to maximize the bids by combining the best of InterFirst and Texas Commerce Bank proposals. The banking services cost of InterFirst was the lowest of the three proposals. The 32 basis point proposal on $6.7 million is better than most C.D. bids in the area. Texas Commerce is also offering excellent C.D. rates, especially on maturities of 180 days and longer. It can ',- be concluded that the City received two excellent bids. RECOMMENDATIONS "-- o That the banking services contract be awarded to InterFirst. o That the first $6.7 million of investment funds be used to purchase 67 Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 each from InterFirst Bank through its PAC Program. o That the next $15 million of investment funds be used to purchase Texas Commerce Bank's Certificates of Deposit, placing as many as possible in the 180 day and long maturity brackets. o That any investments over the combined $21.7 million be bid at the time the money becomes available and be awarded to the highest bidder if the bid exceeds the yield on Treasury Bills. o That in the event there are no bids in excess of T-Bi11 Yield, then the City should go through InterFirst to purchase T-Bi11s at the market rate. o That the City execute a safekeeping agreement as soon as possible between the depository banks and the trustee bank. - Clearly, these three proposals submitted prove the value of the bidding process. After the City awards the banking services contract to InterFirst and the investment portions to InterFirst and Texas Commerce, there is a potential earnings benefit to the City of North Rich1and Hills of $67,501 in each year of the two year contract. Discussions with InterFirst and Texas Commerce indicate a spirit of cooperation and a willingness to serve the City of North Richland Hills. I will be available to answer any questions regarding the bidding process and the resulting analysis. Sincerely, ~M/~ 1. J/J< t~_ f- Lewis F. McLain, Jr. '- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ANALYSIS DF BANK DEPOSITORY PROPOSALS '- SDURCES OF INCOME: ----------------- INTERFIRST BANK ALLIED BANK TEXAS COMMERCE ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- BASIS PTS UU BASIS PTS U$$ BASIS PTS $$U 1. C.D. RATES> $100,000 --------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 14 - 29 DAYS' $1,153.846 Wi) n73) (125) ($14.423) 5 $577 30 - 59 DAYS r, 153'.846 (15) (173) ( 12S) (lt423) 5 577 60 - 89 DAYS 1;153;346 (10) (Wi) (12S) (14;423) 5 577 90 - 119 DAYS 1',153',846 ( 10) (115) (125) (14',423) 10 1,154 120 - 149 DAYS 1;153;346 ( 10) illS) (125) (14;423) 10 1;154 150 - 179 [fAYS 1 ~ 153~ 846 (10) ( lIS) (125) (1·f,423) 10 1 ~ 154 180 - 209 DAYS 1;153;846 (5) (58) (125) (14;423) 25 2;685 210 - 239 DAYS r.153~B46 (5) i58} (12S) (14,423) 25 2,885 240 - 269 DAYS 1;153;846 (S) (58) (125) (14;423~ 25 2;885 270 - 299 DAYS I', 153',846 is) (58) (125) (14,423) 25 2~885 300 - 329 DAYS 1;153;846 (5) (58) i12S} (14;423) 25 2;885 330 - 365 DAYS r, 153',846 (5) (58) (125) U4',423} 25 t, aas 365 DAYS 1;153;846 is} (58) (125) (14;423) 25 2;885 iPAC PRDGRA!'!) 6', 7Q(I', 000 32 21,440 ' 0 ü -------- -------- -------- $20,228 ($187,500) $25,385 2. LOAN CHARGES: $5009000 85.00I 85.00I 80.00% BENEFIT .50Y. -0.31ï. -0.31ï. 0.167- SAVIN8S 7.76Y. $0 $0 $457 .. 3UPERNOW REVENUE: J. AVERAGE MONTHLY BALANCE $500.000 $261,000 $300,000 W.JERA6E RATE t:- ryr., ~.96Z b.OÚi. -..i...,J.. ESTIMATED EARNINGS $26.250 $15,556 $IS, 000 -------- -------- -------- TOTAL REVENUES $46.478 ($171,944! $43.842 - -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- EXPENSES: --------- 1. IIHERFIRST 8ANK ALLIED BANK TEXAS COMMERCE ESTIMATED ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ITEii VOLUME RATE CaST RATE COST RATE caST ----------------------- --------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE 48 $5.00 $240 $5.00 $240 $10.00 $480 DEPOSIT TICKETS 1,584 0.05 79 HIC (I 0.40 634 ITEiiS DEPOSITED 240;000 0.05 12,000 0.05 12,000 0.06 14.400 ITEKS PAID 13'. 20tj 0.05 600 0.10 1',320 0.15 1~ 980 RETURÞI ITEMS '480 2.00 960 3.00 1;440 2.00 ' 960 PRINTED CHECKS 15,000 HII'! 0 MIA 0 N/A 0 WIRE SERVICES 85 10.00 8S0 15.00 1,275 10.00 850 STOP PAYMENT CHECK 3 N/C 0 15.00 45 15.00 45 COIN WRAPPERS FURNISHED N/A N/C 0 NiC 0 NfC 0 NISHT DEPOSITORY BAGS 10 W/C 0 HIC (I 10.00 100 CANCELLED CKS RETURNED IN NUMERCIAL ORDER 12,000 0 300 HIC 0 0.025 300 SAFE DEPOSIT BOXES 1 N/C 0 65.00 65 70.00 70 -------- -------- -------- $15,089 $16,385 $19,819 2. SECURITIES PURCHASE CHRG 2,600 26,000 10,400 3. SAFEKEEPING CHARGES 0 0 1,500 -------- -------- -------- TOTAL EXPENSES: $17,689 $42,385 $31,719 NET REVENUES $28~7B9 ($2H,329) $12~123 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- '- "- SDURCES O~ INCOME: ----------------- I ~HEF:F rqST EANK ALLIED BANK TEXAS CO~MERCE ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- BASIS PT3 U$$ BASIS PTS U$$ BASIS PTS un L c 1\ RATES $100.000 --------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- . ~. 14 - 29 DAYS $1.153.846 \15\ 0 (125) $0 :; Sü ~rl - 59 DAYS 1.153.246 ( 15} (> 1\'<;\ I) ~ 0 ........ ''''''''''l 60 - 99 DAYS 1;153;846 (W) 0 i125} í} 5 Ú 90 - 119 DAYS 1.153,846 (10} 0 i12S} 0 10 (I 120 - 149 DAYS 1;153.846 (!O} 0 í125} 0 10 0 150 - f"'Q DAYS 1~153.846 dO} 0 (125) 0 10 0 .1 , 180 - 209 DAYS t;! 53 ; 846 (5) (, (125) 0 25 1) ....: 210 - 239 DAYS 1'.153,846 (S} í) (125) 0 25 r, -' 240 - 269 DAYS L 153; 846 (5) t) {125} 0 25 0 270 - 299 DAYS 1 ~ 153'.846 (5} 0 f12S} 0 25 0 300 - 329 DAYS 1.153;846 (5} Ü 025} 0 25 0 330 - 365 DAYS 1'.153.846 is} 0 !125} 0 25 0 365 DAYS L 153; 846 (5} 0 í125¡ (I 25 37,5£}0 (PAC PROSRA!1) 6,700,(100 32 21,440 0 0 -------- -------- -------- $21,440 $0 $37,500 2. LOAN CHARGES: $5ÚO.OOO 85.0n 85.00% 80.00~ BENEFIT 9.507- -(!.311. -0.317. (I. m; SAVINSS ì.76~ $0 $0 $457 3. SUPERNOW REVENUE: AVERAGE !'!ONTHLY BALANCE $500.000 $261. 000 noo.ooo AVERASE RATE r; Jf~I( 5.96% 6.00I .....L,...l. ESTIMATED EAR~INSS $26,250 $15.556 $I 8~ 000 CITY DF NORTH R!CHLAND HILLS ANALYSIS OF BANK DEPOSITORY PROPDSALS -------- -------- -------- TOTAL RE\lENUES $47.690 $15.556 $55,957 - -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- EXPENSES: --------- ! INTERFIRST BANK ALL! ED BANK TEXAS COMMERCE .. ESTI~ATED ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ITEM VOLUME RATE COST RATE COST RATE COST ----------------------- --------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE 48 $5.00 $240 $5.00 $240 $10.00 $480 DEPOSIT TICKETS 1.584 0.05 79 H/C (I 0.40 J.~4 ...',) ITEMS DEPOSITED 240;000 0.05 12~(9) 0.05 12.000 0.06 14.40(1 ITEMS PAID 13; 200 0.05 660 0.1(1 1 ~ 320 0.15 1; 980 RETURN ITE!'!S ' 480 2.00 %0 3.00 1,440 2.(10 ' 960 PRINTED CHECKS 15,000 NJA 0 NíA 0 li/A 0 WIRE SERVICES 85 10.00 850 15.00 I! 275 10.00 850 STOP PAYMENT CHECK 3 NIC (! 15.00 45 15.00 45 COW WRAPPERS FURNISHED N/A NfC 0 NIC 0 NíC Ij rH6HT DEPOSITORY BAGS 10 rue 0 ruc 0 10.00 100 CANCELLED CKS RETURNED IN NU!'!ERCIAL ORDER 12~000 (I 300 N/e 0 0.025 300 SAFE DEPOS IT BOXES 1 NIC <) 65.00 65 70.00 ìO -------- -------- -------- $15,089 $16,385 $19,819 2. SECUR HI ES PURCHASE CHR6 2~600 26,000 10,400 3. SAFEKEEPINS CHARGES 0 0 1',SOO -------- -------- -------- TOTAL EXPENSES: $I 7 , 6B9 $42,385 $31,719 NET REVENUES $10.001 í$26,829) $24,239 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- '-- t ~epartment: Subject: L L L L L L L L Source of Funds: L Bonds (GO/~ev.) Operating Budget /_ L L OI~L ¡¿¡~, Department Head SignatttFØ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM L L I L.... L ¡ I L ! L L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works" , , " Qouncll Meeting Date: 9/9/85 Request,of Irving Groves ,of Williamsburg Associates, Inc. for Two»r~vewav OpeninSl;s on Rufe Snow í Agenda Number: GN 85-88 A developer has purchased,ap.t.rceJ;.of,land from a large~'tr~ctof land at the southwest corner of Rufe Snow and Industria.1Park Blvd. The parcel.has465 feet of frontage along Rufe Snow and is appro1d.uaåtely 2()()feet deep. This owner,hâs Ênibdivided this land into three separate lots and,IU~såâk.ed.fOr two driveways to be split equally between the three lots. ( The developer has been 'advised that we are attempting to,_intain a standard øf one driveway for every 500;ftlet or major portion thereof1rbere,atract of land is taken from a larger tractofland~ ,~ere is still, quite a bitôf31a~d left in this tract after this developer remove&åts lots frOØ1the ,largertract''J'h.reisalso approxi1nately another 500 feet of frontageonR.u;feSnow for thelarger,iract of land andsevèral thousand feet of frontage on Ind""a;trial Park Blvd. " The developer has su~ttedtotb.Pl1blic Works Department a traffic study which was done by Barton-AschmanAssociates,Inc. of Dallas, Texas. Tlter.port states that two driveways would not 'have, a negative effect on the traffic Ocn'llufe Snow. This, is not believed to be correct, because all openings onto Rufe.Snow uveanegative e~fect on the traffic. By way of comparison, the OûtletMalls of America Shopþtt'l:gCent.er and four fast food restaurants share oneentrmce,Wh1'ch is a,t Lewis ,Drive. ,'1'hÉl previous south entrance to the Outlet Mall, whichÞasrecentlyb~enclosed, had a hig1t accident rate. A$ a matter of fac:.t, there were 43accidènts,àtthat driveway in oneyeàr and seven of these accidents were major:i:ø.>uture, This single entrance does not appear to have been detrimental to these business,es and it is believed that it would work for the subject property at Industrial Park Blvd, and Rufe Snow. Further, the owner of the tract of land at the north....st,c:orner of Rufe Snow and Loop 820 has about 1,000 feet of frontage on Rufe Snow .d¡:....as)required to spend over $100,000 to put in newsipa.1s .and<tC1 tie the signa1stogether plus widening pf the lanes in the area of McDona.1ds in order for hi1nto have one entrance onto Rufe Snow. In addition, on RufeSno"northof'Cbapman on/the east side of < the street the:re are two developers at this t11l1etryingto.develop shopping centers with almost 1,400 feet of frontage on Rufe Snoweacb, They have been told that tbeymayhave three driveway openings for the 1,400 feet. Recommendation: It is recommended that the <fity Council deny the request for two driveway openings onto Rufe Snow. Finance RevieW Acct. Number Sufficient Funds A vall able tf{~ City Manager . Finance Director 1 Page 1 9f WILLIAMSBURG ASSOCIATES, INC. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT SUITE 660 eLB-68 - 4144 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY DALLAS. TEXAS T5204 (214) 821-0396 IRVING ~f. GROVEH, III PRESIDENT August 30, 1985 Mr. Rodger Line City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Curb cuts to Lot 2R, Lot 3 and Lot 4 located at the southwest corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Industrial Park Boulevard, Industrial Park Addition in North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Mr. Line: The purpose of this letter is to present the request of the owners of Lots 2R, 3, and 4 in City Block 7, Industrial Park Addition of North Richland Hills, Texas for curb cuts for access to Rufe Snow Drive from these lots. A copy of the plat approved by the North Richland Hills City Council on August 26, 1985 is included as Attachment 1. As indicated thereon, I am the owner of lots 2R and 3 of this addition. Lot 2R currently is under contract for sale to Kentucky Fried Chicken. Williams-Silverthorn Development Company, Inc. is the owner of lot 4 of this addition. I have met on two occasions with Mr. Gene Riddle, the Director of Public Works for the City of North Richland Hills, concerning curb cuts for this property. He has informed me that only one curb cut will be allowed for all three platted lots. He explained his reasoning for this conclusion as follows: o More curb cuts are more dangerous than fewer curb cuts; and o The City has an unwritten policy that only one curb cut is allowed for every 500 feet along Rufe Snow Drive. In response to Mr. Riddle's comments regarding the issue of safety, I engaged the nationally-known traffic consulting firm of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Their assignment was to recommend that number and placement of curb cuts along Rufe Snow Drive which would, in their opinion, satisfy the dual objectives of (1) orderly development of the property and (2) reasonable access and sufficient distances between the access points to allow safe and orderly traffic flow. The owners' original desire was to obtain three curb cuts, one for each platted lot. Mr. Rodger Line August 30, 1985 Page 2 A copy of Barton-Aschman's technical memorandum is included as Attachment 2. Based on their professional analysis of the area's traffic flows and the pro- posed uses of the lots, they recommend two curb cuts for the three lots. They conclude that "... two access drives will not cause any detrimental affect along Rufe Snow Drive." The placement of these two curb cuts is indicated in Attachment 2, with the northernmost cut some 120 feet south of the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive and Industrial Park Drive. Further, they state that "any further reduction of the number of access drives will not provide sufficient access to allow the properties to develop in a quality manner and should not be considered. " In order to test the success of Mr. Riddle's policy on one curb cut five hundred feet of frontage along Rufe Snow Drive, I have driven the that road from Interstate 820 to Bursey Road a number of times. my conclusion that, given the number and distance between these curb this unwritten policy has not been applied in an entirely consistent manner. for every length of It is cuts, that Mr. Line, I desire to develop this land so as to ensure that the safety citizens using my development and Rufe Snow Drive is not impaired. I that our proposed plan using two curb cuts will satisfy this objective. allow only one curb cut will present the following problems: of the believe To -- o Barton-Aschman Associates has indicated actually be more dangerous than two, as for a longer period of time going into increasing congestion and driver anxiety. orally that one curb cut may traffic is required to queue up and out of the site, thereby o If placed in the center of the parcel, the impulse-driven patrons of the Kentucky Fried Chicken estab,lishment will be required to travel some 220 feet beyond that establishment to access the facility. This, in my OPI- nion, renders the corner lot, (2R), virtually useless for its highest and best use as a fast food, convenience store, or gasoline service station operation. As evidence of this, Kentucky Fried Chicken has indicated that it will break its contract with me if one curb cut is not allowed somewhere along its frontage. I am not as confident as Mr. Riddle that " someone will buy the property" within a reasonable period at its proper price if this contract were to fall through. o The owner of lot 4 indicates that a property will not adequately service ment, given its impulse nature. tenants have indicated that if this their lease commitments. single curb cut in the center of the his auto sales and service develop- In fact, certain of his prospective occurs, they likely will not honor -- Mr. Rodger Line August 30, 1985 Page 3 '"'--, o Finally, my attorney finds no City Ordinances which give Mr. Riddle the authority to arbitrarily limit access to the three parcels. In summary, to arbitrarily limit the right of access to the three lots will cause unneccessary traffic congestion, severely curtail access to the property, create an inefficient access system as compared to the recommendation of my con- sultant, and cause great economic detriment to both owners of the subject pro- perty. For these reasons, I believe it is in the best interest to the development of the property and for the City of North Richland Hills to follow the recommendation of the professional transportation planner and allow two curb cuts as recommended in the enclosed study. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, ho/ Irvmg M. Groves, III Enclosures IMG/ln '- ~ ~ '- "v --- f> 1\ ~\( - -Dl\ ~ /~1'~ L , ~/0 , -(" 00'5 89°lf2' 20" E ~\'" ~60. lflf.36' ./ \ J'I y ~..~ , ~ .. '16 u.s. -/ ,/ 'P.O. B . ~~0'5 . ""--- . 15' 8LDG~LINE~ o! \.... ~ -- .-.....:::::- ------/ L ---= ............... .: "~.;...--:::, I ' ~ ,- ~ ,: /:/. .. I~ ~ LOT 2R ffi ' -/ a~1 / / ZONED - 1-2 _ Y~ 26. 302. 0999 So.. FT. I&JI&J , I (06038 AC.) ,,/; ~~o/ ~- . ~55.2'') I .~~+ ~I I //Ø:f?~ i I //.~~ ~ I ~' / ~~ v~ ~, I ,~" ;:, 1 y~~<> ~ ~,' J , -' lID II~ f I : I ~ I : , 8 I 120' , 60' ~<v ~~ ' () w > H a:: o 'S 89·06'00u E. 278.28' -- 223.00' !~ p "::)J:::J '-J~ f,- :;>t..", ~W ~~ ~Ct.) -p::- c( A I ~ I i I :~ I&J ,- :i z = ~ I..; õ c; '2 0 Q - if' ~ - 0 11'1 0 Pi 1 ~ I I LOT 3 ZONED - 1-2 46.'72.6272 So.. FT. U.0692 AC.) -........ - ~ a z (f) r lR .. - 1-2 .8131 so.. FT. ~ ACRES) .. Pi . o o z I I I J. I ; I ï I 110,' lr- I I , " UTIl. ES"T.~.... -==- -N~9·06~O·" II~ ~O~~;- - - - ::~. DO' - - - ~~U"":='''~41.... ;';';:. .. . ¡,..>..~. " S 89·06'00" E -- 223. 001 1JJ 4. ::> ~ LOT 4 ZONED - 1-2 28.098.00 SQ. FT. (0.64:5 AC.' - .' ':0": . ~'., 'c.:..:" .". " ' .' . -i'~-~~~f:'''i~,:~.,~-);~~~;'¡1;.·'~;7 I :';'.,;~·;"¡;,i:.&.L'.å_',';'.:. L ...., . j;,··.··:·«,··.:···-r:"':,··.-c"':,:.,··,·. :,c:.;.'¡;;'i'-',,·"'':-:i2,....,.,,~;, ' , .. ",:., . c: .,.:' ~':., .." .,;. : _ .,. 71< L· '''! -CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS L. Department: Uubject: Administration Resolution 85-21:"'}1:'0posed IH 820/FM 1938 Interchan~e Im~ro~ements COuncil Meeting Date: 9/9/85, Ag~nda Number: GN 85-89 I.... L Final preparations are:noW'UI).4erway for the Septe.b~'J;:2i~~þpresentation to th. State Department of Highways.. and .P\&bl;c Transportation, for'~Þ'\proposed interchange improvements at Loop 820,flt]'938. aJ)d. State HighwaY~6. " ,Part of the document$tion requir.{d is a resolution from tÞe Cö1Ulcil petitioningtÞeState for the needed funds. L Recommendation: Approve the attached Re801u~ion. (' ¡ I.- ¡ I.- r L L ¡ t I.... ¡ . . I.- f l.. I I L L t I I.... L L , Finance RevIew r L Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ operatlnø¡'tdget" .... ., ' Otber..~¡JI~.. . ~~~ Department HeådSIg!1!l,t~~. < ..... . ... . ; City Manage, CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avaitable . Finance Director ¡ L Page 1 <IIf 1 RES 0 L UTI 0 N "- WHEREAS, there presently exists a serious and hazardous traffic congestion problem due to inadequate street and highway facilities in the intersection complex made up of Interstate 820, State Highway 121, State Highway 26 and Farm-To-Market Road 1938; and WHEREAS, these facilities are inadequate as they were designed to meet 1975 traffic flow and cannot handle current or projected future traffic conditions; and WHEREAS, by vehicle count and State Highway Department District Office calculations the most serious and hazardous traffic bottlenecks in Tarrant County exist at the above described interchange; and WHEREAS other cities in Northeast Tarrant County are affected and have resolved to support improvements; and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills has been working with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation and DeShazo, Starek and Tang and various consultants and professional people since 1983 to develop a suitable design; and WHEREAS, the Tarrant County Commissioners Court has unanimously and wholeheartedly endorsed and supported a proposed project which would help solve the above described problem; - NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of North Richland Hills do hereby petition the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation to accept the design of an interchange system at this location and to approve funding for said interchange at its September 26th, 1985 Meeting. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 9th day of September, 1985. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney ,~ L I L L r- I L ,- \.... l L ¡ L I I "- r L r-- ¡ ..... ,". t , I \- (' I L L L ¡ ..... i L " ( Lr ¡ L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Personnel Council Meeting Date: 9/9/85 Agenda Number: PU 85-26 Subject: Increase in PréDIìumfor General Liability/Property , Insurance Home Insurance CompanYi1ta.s.~d.vt.~d.>t~at .our General r..;.âJ.)ility,and Proper tv insurance premium fot:theP~·~;(:y·y~ar 6/23/85 - 6/231~~J:la$increased from $15.642 to $35.919. ~e,pai4thE!$1~,642 in June so anaddi:tional ,$20,277 must be paid to keeP..tbepp~içY~t.lforce. This is unu$~l()nly because Home, increased the premiumra1:het:t~an<cancel the policy in..mid...st'ream. Home has advised they will not'bidour liability. or any municip~1..1.iab:i.li ty coverages in the future. In the/insurance industry this is the~l~~ather than the exception. Municipal«±iability is no longer a~tr~ctiv.¡)ecause of several developments: the dt:()pin<~nterest .rateswhicb' ha;s<:µt.into ,insurers I profiit; the erosion by theco\l.'rt.s()~C.itiEUJtilDØ1unity from lawsl1itsand;theincreas!e in the size of judgme~ts,..aß~if1st,ci~ie$S1:emming from~~()se·suits. Insurers consider municipal l~bilÎity~,,~~l_~ky.and thereforec:j.i~ies~it.hercan' t get insurance at all or are receiving bids aVeraging LOO-4CIO percent higher than last year. There are funds avai1"ble ,iri.: the 1984/85 operating!)udget to pay the $20,277, in additional premiumsta~ed above. Reconunendation It is reconunendedthatt.ÞeÇityCounci! authorizetñ.êpaYInent of $20.277 in additional prem1wn<ciue for the/City's General Liability' and Property insurance for the policy year.6/2318S- 6123186. . F,nance Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget X Olh.~.~ , Department HeWSignat"re , ' CITY OOUNCIL ACTION ITEM . ~ City Manager 1 Page 1Cþf , , ;>~''';''.':;¡/' '0 '';''.,y,..~, ;.'¡i;,j",,:<,;:;~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ¡ L ¡ i ..... Department: Utility Subject: Oversizing Water Mains forOâkHills Subdivision Council MeeUng Date: 9-9-85 Agenda Number: PAY 85-44 r ._~ \ l... r l The water lines have'b~~ì\iáSt.al1è.din the Oak.HillsSn'bdivision to the city's satisfaction.a~t1l.i,s time. The developeri~nC)wire<1uesting the city's participation in this overs iz ing of a couple of these water lines. r \ l. Bids were receiVêd and>J$.pproved for this project. the City Coun¢ilinSêptember of 1984 I l. Recommendation: The staff rec~nds approval of payment to Oak Hills Joint Venture in the amount of $124.532 for the city's participation in the water lines for Oak Hills Subdivision. ¡ l.. ! ¡ L.. L r t l.. L L r l L ¡ ¡ 10..- I- i L i I '- ! t L Source of Funds: Bonøs (GO/Rev.) Operating, Budget Other' R.ev. Finance Review Acct. Number 09-00-80-6700 SUfl~AV~ RiL~i City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director ! "- Page 1 Of 1 '- , . August 22, 1985 OAK HILLS JOINT VENTURE 700 Harwood Road Hurst, Texas 76054 281-1540 - Mro Allen Bronstad Assistant Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Oak Hills Addition - North Richland Hills - Oversize Water Mains Dear Mr. Bronstad: The water mains within this addition have now been installed and we hereby request the City to pay their agreed upon participation, for the water mains only, in the amount Of¡¡$-J2~5J~~$.)9.. J" ;~--- If I 2. I 53;¿ . ~ I A copy of the breakdown from the contract is enclosed for your use in reviewing our request. We would appreciate your assistance in taking the necessary steps to obtain approval of this request so that we might receive payment as soon as possible. Sincerely, ~~. '1Ikt~J1 Kenneth C. Whitel~Ý'~ Attorney at Law Trustee for Oak Hills Joint Venture ODL/ml cc: John Barfield -. .'..... r L' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , I , L Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date~ 9-9-85 r L Subject: Morgan Meadows East, DraÌì1å,e ItIlprovements Partial Pay Esti1î\llte#3 ' Agenda Number: PAY 85-45 r- L This contractorha4clea;edall of the right-of-way on this project and the electric company hasn1Qvedall of the poles that were in the way on this project. They should get their wires moved from the old poles in the nextfew~ays and the contractor will be able to start construction on the box culvert on GhapøanRoad and the box culvert at North Forty. L L L L After these box for the rest of Recommendation: The staff: recQmmends approval of payment :in the amount of $47,306.24 tol,CH Construction Co. in place he will start his channel liner Funding Source:09-00~15-6700 - $13,l77.ll 13-00':'51-6150- $34,129.l2 I L r L I L L L L f I.... L Finance RevIew L Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~ Rev. g¡::~lng 8U~ ==,.1W,. ,',' .~,:_ t,,,, ',' . , ----.~/.', ""',,'," ',' '-,' .'~- " , Department HeW 1IIÌIIùe. . CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct Number See Above Sufffctent ds Available ,/ . Finance Director L . ,. ',,' ·~~;~ii\:~<,·;~"-'.:,:,t.;.:r~3'';'~:':'~·',ì,'' - Page 1 qf I I r I L -/ . KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. "- CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 27, 1985 '-- Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 '-- Re: -- Enclosed is one ~o"y of Contractor's Partiál Pay Estimate No.3, dated August 27, 1985, made payable to L C H Construction Co., in the amount of $47,306.24, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of August 23, 1985. The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by his signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $47,306.24, be made to L C H Construction Co., P.O. Box 227, Decatur, TX, 76234. . Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ~!A/, ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWAllld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ~ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works~ iD::iIScœ.'lEOR Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of .Finance L C H Construction Co. -/ -- 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 '. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 L ;- , L L L L f L ! L L L I L L r L f L L L L ¿ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Hewitt Street PaV':l.ngç4.I>rainage Improvements SUbject: Pay Estimate 12 Council Meeting Dater: 9/9/85 Agenda Number: PAY 85-46 This project is well ahead of s.chedule and proceeding w:l.~houtdifficulty. Recommendation: Approve payment in the)tÞl1ount of 309,373.27 to P & RPaV':l.n.8,Inc. Funding Source: 109-00...¡s...670() 09-0o-75...~7~ø 13-00;.,50..6150 $ 2.185.00 "'18,167.71 , 289,020.56 Source of Funds: Bonds (GOJRev.) ºperatlngBudget Other GØ/RJ!;'i Finance Review Acct. Number: S~~ ~bove S~flc~~1\Y""abI. -c~m~ , City Manager r.. . Finance Director \...../ L L~~ Department Head Signature' , CITY COUNCIL 1 ".- "-,- . '- ~:.., ~ K NOWL TON-E NG LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 4, 1985 ..... ...... Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ...... .. ... Re: 3-210, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HEWITT STREET PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.2 ....... Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2, dated September 4, 1985, made payable to P & R Paving Inc., in the amount of $309,373.27, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of August 31, 1985. ...... The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the ~ '- estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. - We recommend that this payment, in amount of $309,373.27, be made to P & R Paving Inc., 2040 Loop 336, Suite 125, Conroe, TX, 77304. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: Please use this form for submitting next month's estimate for processing. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. '""' - ..... ~ -. -- RWAl1l d Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance P & R Paving Inc. ---. - --.. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 l CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Harwood Road Streit:, and Dt.inage Improvements Pay EstiIpatel6 Council Meeting Date: 9/9/85 Agenda Number: PAY 85-47 SUbject: L Although not the final~a~e~t,ttñisproject is virtual1y~oDîpleted with the exception of minor touch-up and stripping~ r l Recommendation: Approve payment in thel:þl1ount .of $14,754.75 to AustitlR.oad Company. r L l L I L L L ! L L L L f I L L Source of Funds: Bonds (GOJRev.) Operating.Sudget GO Othèra~ii ¿partment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL Finance Review . Finance Director f L '-- . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 4, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-229, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON HARWOOD ROAD FROM BOB DR. TO HIGHWAY 26 CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.5, dated September 4, 1985, made payable to Austin Road Co., in the amount of $14,754.75, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of August 31, 1985. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd A. McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. - We recommend that this payment, in amount of $14,754.75, be made to Austin Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Ft. Worth, TX, 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. Rl~.tf( ~ RWA/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Austi n Road Co. "-- 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 L' L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administrat:LOD Glenview DriveiStreet, and Drainage Improvements Pay Estimate #5 ' Council Meeting Date: 9/9/85 Agenda Number: PAY 85-48 SUbject: ¡ L ] Although behind sc:hedu1.ê tb:LsproJèc~, is now substa-nt:Lally" complete. L L L Recommendation: Approve payment in theamouneqfi$24,062.48 to Aust:LnR,oådc01npany. L L L y I ¡ ~ J ¡ \ i- Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating BUdget Other ~Wtr)1,. .. ·74,;>i" Departmen1l:dsioné1ture 01rYOØfJNclL ACTlONI"fEM GO 'U-00-04-6150 ,s Available ---. , Finance Director ... .:c'·, :,;}."" . Page 1 011 1 -/ "---~ . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas September 4, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-230, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON GLENVIEW DR. FROM HONEY LANE TO RUFE SNOW DR. CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partia1 Pay Estimate No.5, dated September 4, 1985, made payable to Austin Road Co., in the amount of $24,062.48, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of August 31, 1985. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd A. McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. - We recommend that this payment, in amount of $24,062.48, be made to Austin Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Ft. Worth, TX, 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may h e c.oncerniøi~ RI RWA/ll d Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Austin Road Co. -. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367