HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1985-09-23 Agendas
L
L
¡
L
i
L.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 - 6:00 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820.
L
I
i
\
L.
NUMBER
ACTION TAKEN
ITEM
1.
ì
¡,...
i
!
L.
2.
L
L
3.
I
L
¡
L
4.
:\
\
I
5.
L
I
L-
L
I
i
'--
i
L
PZ 85-56 Proposed Comprehensive Master
Plan (Agenda Item No.8)
PS 85-58 Request Qf Johnston and Son
Construction Inc. for Replat
of Block 6, Meadow Lakes
Addition (Agenda Item No.12)
GN 85-92 Ordinance No. 1282, Adopting
Section 207(K) of the U.S.
Fair Labor Standards Act
(Agenda Item No. 16)
PS 85-35 Request of Alan W. Hàmm; Inc.
for Final Plat of Briarwood
Estates, Section 6
(Agenda Item No. 10)
GN 85-93 Resolution No. 85-25,
Suspending Lone Star Gas
Company's Schedule of Rates
(Agenda Item No. 17)
L
L
"
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
f
L
¡
L
6.
L
L
L
I
L
7.
*Executive Session to Discuss
Land, Personnel, and/or
Litigation
Other Items
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by
the Open Meetings Law
L
L
L
L
L
i
i
L
I
L
I
¡
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 23, 1985
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
NUMBER ITEM
1. Call to Order
ACTION TAKEN
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting September 9,
1985
5. Minutes of the Special Meeting September 12,
1985
6. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda
7. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by
Asterisk (B, II, 12, IS, 16, 17, 1B, 19, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, & 2B)
*B. PZ 85-56 Proposed Comprehensive Master Plan
I 9.
PZ 85-100 Request of,R.G.A. Development
Corp. for an Appeal Hearing
10. PS 85-35 Request of Alan W. Hamm, Inc. for
Final Plat of Briarwood Estates,
Section 6 (Located south of
Starnes Road and east of Douglas
Lane)
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*11. PS 85-55 Request of John Barfield, Herman
Smith, and the City of North
Richland Hills for Replat of
Tracts AR and B, Block 2,
Crestwood Estates (Located on the
southwest corner of Davis Blvd.
and Starnes Road)
*12. PS 85-58 Request of Johnston and Son
Construction Inc. for Replat of
Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition
(Located on the south side of
Meadow Lakes Drive at the
intersection of Rufe Snow Drive)
13. SO 85-12 Request by Federal Sign for a Sign
Variance at Tony Roma's, 8010
Bedford Euless Road
14. GN 85-88 Request of Irving Groves of
Williamsburg Associates, Inc. for
Two Driveway Openings on Rufe Snow
(Postponed at the September 9,
1985 Meeting)
*15. GN 85-91 Resolution No. 85-23, Request by
Gene Huggins for Utility Easement
Abandonment in Block 42CR,
Richland Terrace Addition
*16. GN 85-92 Ordinance No. 1282, Adopting
Section 207(K) of the U.S. Fair
Labor Standards Act
Page 3
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*17. GN 85-93 Resolution No. 85-25, Suspending
Lone Star Gas Company's Schedule
of Rates
*18. GN 85-94 Ordinance No. 1283, Littering
Ordinance
*19. GN 85-95 Acceptance of State Grant for
Beautification Projects
*20. GN 85-96 Ordinance No. 1274, Adopting TMRS
Buy Back Provision of Forfeited
Prior Service
*21. PU 85-27 Ratification of Expenditure of
$7,318.00 to Ferguson Pump and
Supply to Repair One 150 H.P. Pump
*22. PU 85-28 Resolution No. 85-24, Authorizing
Contract for Lease/Pur~hase
Equipment
*23. PU 85-29 Renewal of City's Law Enforcement
Liability Insurance
*24. PU 85-30 Renewal of City's Auto Liability
Insurance
25. PU 85-31 Approval of Purchase of Land
*26. PW 85-19 Award of Bids for Animal Control
and Service Center
Page 4
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*27. PW 85-20 Bids for Street and Drainage
Improvements - Municipal Complex
Site
*28. PAY 85-49 Watauga Trunk Sewer Line Phase II
Contractor's Pay Estimate No. 3
29. Citizen Presentation
30. Adjournment
I--
'--
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 9, 1985 - 7:00 P.M.
1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order September 9, 1985,
at 7:00 p.m.
2. Present:
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
Harold Newman
Jim Kenna
Jim Ramsey
Staff :
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Lee Maness
Richard Royston
Richard Albin
Marjorie Nash
Press:
David Ray
Mark England
Chris Williams
Absent:
Virginia Moody
Gene Riddle
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
Finance Director
Director of Planning
City Engineer
Planning & Zoning Member
Northeast Chronicle
Mid Cities
Fort Worth Star Telegram
Councilwoman
Public Works Director
3. Mayor Pro Tem Davis gave the invocation.
4. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve the minutes of the regular meeting of August 26, 1985.
Motion carried 6-0.
5. None
6. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 6-0.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 26, 1985
APPROVED
REMOVAL OF ITEM (S)
FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM
(S) INDICATED BY
ASTERISK (16, 17, 18,
19, 20, 21, 23, 25,
26, 27, 28, 29 & 30)
APPROVED
'--
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
delay Items 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 because the City
Council meeting time had been moved to 7:00 p.m.
Motion carried 6-0.
15. Nick England, Vice President of Carlisle Outdoor, Inc.
appeared before the Council.
Mr. England stated that this billboard would be located
at the Pilgrim Mini-Warehouse on Loop 820 and would be
double-faced, 672 square feet and 50 feet high.
Mr. England stated the request met all the criteria
in the Sign Ordinance.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve SO 85-11.
Motion carried 6-0.
22. Mr. Line advised the Council that the applicant had requested
that this item be postponed until September 23rd.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to postpone GN 85-88.
Motion carried 6-0.
24. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to appoint Bobby D. Langston to serve a two-year term on
the Cable Advisory Board.
Motion carried 6-0.
7. Mayor Echols opened the Public , Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Michael Burkett, Attorney, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Burkett stated that Birraporetti's had been in business
for over twelve years. Mr. Burkett stated that the
restaurant would be located in North Hills Mall
and he had received permission from the Mall for the
application. Mr. Burkett stated that they had met all
the city and state requirements.
Mayor Echols asked in whose name the permit would be
issued.
'-
Mr. Burkett stated the permit would be in the name of
Michael Horan.
September 9, 1985
Page 2
SO 85-11 REQUEST BY
CARLISLE OUTDOOR,
INC. FOR BILLBOARD
SIGN ON LOT 2, BLOCK
10, RICHLAND HEIGHTS
ADDITION (LOCATED
AT THE PILGRIM MINI-
WAREHOUSE ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF LOOP
820
APPROVED
GN 85-88 REQUEST OF
IRVING GROVES OF
WILLIAMSBURG
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR
TWO DRIVEWAY OPENINGS
ON RUFE SNOW
POSTPONED
GN 85-90 APPOINTMENT
TO CABLE ADVISORY
BOARD
PZ 85-89 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
NOTRE DAMIAN CORP. TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
LOT 1R, BLOCK B,
CALLOWAY FARMS
ADDITION FROM C-l
(COMMERCIAL) TO
C-1-SU- (SPECIFIC
USE) SALE OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
(BIRRAPORETTI'S
RESTAURANT IS LOCATED
IN THE NORTH HILLS
MALL SHOPPING CENTER)
'-
Mayor Echols advised that since the meeting had started
early he would delay in calling for opposition at this
time.
Mayor Echols advised that there would be a special
council meeting at 5:30 p.m., September 12, 1985 to
canvass the results of the election.
Mayor Echols called a recess.
Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order and
the same Council members and Staff were present as
recorded at the beginning of the meeting.
Mayor Echols stated that the hearing on PZ 85-89 would
resume at this time.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
8. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Ordinance No. 1275 to be issued in the name
of Michael Horan and non-transferable.
Motion carried 6-0.
9. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
John Rodriques, Vice President and General Manager of
Pulido's, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Rodriques stated that they had been operating at their
present location for 15 years. Mr. Rodriques stated that
they would like to sell alcoholic beverages to compete
with their competitors.
Mayor Echols asked in whose name the permit would be issued.
Mr. Rodriques stated it would be in the name of John
Rodriques.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
10. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Ordinance No. 1276, to be in the name of John
Rodriques and non-transferable.
Motion carried 6-0.
September 9, 1985
Page 3
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
ORDINANCE NO. 1275
APPROVED
PZ 85-91 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
PULIDO ASSOCIATION,
INC. TO REZONE TRACT
11B3E, W.W. WALLACE
SURVEY, ABSTRACT
1606, FROM R-7 MF
(MULTI-FAMILY) AND LR
(LOCAL RETAIL) TO
LR-SU- (SPECIFIC USE)
SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (LOCATED ON
GLENVIEW COURT AT
LOOP 820, THE
EXISTING PULIDO'S
RESTAURANT)
ORDINANCE NO. 1276
APPROVED
'--
11. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Mr. Joe Lichunstein, representing Rojo Corporation, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Lichunstein stated that this was a convenience store and
they would like to sell beer for off premise consumption.
Mr. Lichunstein stated that they had met all of the
requirements.
Mayor Echols asked in whose name the permit would be issued.
Mr. Lichunstein stated that it would be in the name of
Ron Coleman.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
12. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman,
to approve Ordinance No. 1277 to be in the name of Ron
Coleman and non-transferable.
Motion carried 6-0.
13. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Mr. Carry Beck appeared before the Council.
Mr. Beck stated that they presently own a business
next door to the property in question. Mr. Beck stated
they wanted to move their business to that location and
the property would have to be rezoned to comply with the
Zoning Ordinance.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
14. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Ordinance No. 1278.
Motion carried 6-0.
*16.
September 9, 1985
Page 4
PZ 85-92 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
ROJO CORPORATION TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
LOT 1R, BLOCK 1,
WALKERS BRANCH
ADDITION FROM C-1
(COMMERCIAL) TO
C-1-SU- (SPECIFIC
USE) SALE OF BEER FOR
OFF PREMISE
CONSUMPTION (LOCATED
ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF EMERALD
HILLS WAY AND
GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY)
ORDINANCE NO. 1277
APPROVED
PZ 85-94 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
JIM WARREN, CARRY
BECK, AND GAIL
DOUGLAS TO REZONE
LOTS 3K, 4K AND PARTS
OF 3 AND 4, CALLOWAY
ACRES ADDITION FROM
C-1 (COMMERCIAL) TO
C-2 (COMMERCIAL)
(LOCATED ON PARCHMAN
STREET AND SCRUGGS
DRIVE, NORTH OF
GRAPEVINE HWY.)
ORDINANCE NO. 1278
APPROVED
GN 85-82 RESOLUTION
NO. 85-20, 1985
CERTIFIED TAX ROLL
APPROVED
September 9, 1985
Page 5
*17.
GN 85-83 RESOLUTION
NO. 85-19,
AUTHORIZING AD
VALOREM TAX
EXEMPTIONS
APPROVED
'--
*18.
GN 85-84 ORDINANCE
NO. 1279, LEVYING A
TAX RATE
APPROVED
*19.
GN 85-85 ORDINANCE
NO. 1280, ADOPTING
BUDGET FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1985-86
APPROVED
*20.
GN 85-86 ORDINANCE
NO. 1281, ADOPTING
REVENUE SHARING
BUDGET FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1985-86
APPROVED
*21.
GN 85-87 BANK
DEPOSITORY CONTRACT
APPROVED
*23.
GN 85-89 RESOLUTION
NO. 85-21, PROPOSED
IH 820/FM 1938
INTERCHANGE
IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*25.
PU 85-26 INCREASE IN
PREMIUM FOR GENERAL
LIABILITY/PROPERTY
INSURANCE
APPROVED
\
\
*26.
PAY 85-44 OVERSIZING
WATER MAINS FOR OAK
HILLS SUBDIVISION
APPROVED
*27.
PAY 85-45 MORGAN
MEADOWS EAST DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS PARTIAL
PAY ESTIMATE IF3
APPROVED
September 9, 1985
Page 6
*28.
PAY 85-46 HEWITT
STREET PAVING AND
DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS, PAY
ESTIMATE /12
APPROVED
--
*29.
PAY 85-47 HARWOOD
ROAD STREET AND
DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS, PARTIAL
PAY ESTIMATE /16
APPROVED
*30.
PAY 85-48 GLENVIEW
DRIVE STREET AND
DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS, PAY
ESTIMATE IF5
APPROVED
31. None
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
32. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis,
to adjourn.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion carried 6-0.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
'",--
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 12, 1985 - 5:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order September 12, 1985, _ CALL TO ORDER
at 5:30 p.m.
2. Present:
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Marie Hinkle
Harold Newman
Jim Kenna
Jim Ramsey
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Jeanette Rewis
Richard Royston
City Manager
City Secretary
Director of Planning
Absent:
Dick Fisher
Virginia Moody
Dennis Horvath
Gene Riddle
Rex McEntire
Lee Maness
Richard Albin
Councilman
Councilwoman
Assistant City Manager
Public Works Director
Attorney
Finance Director
City Engineer
3. Mayor Echols presented the following resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 85-22
A RESOLUTION CANVASSING THE RETURNS AND DECLARING
THE RESULTS OF THE BOND ELECTION HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1985
WHEREAS, an election was held in the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas on the 10th day of September, 1985, for
the purpose of submitting certain propositions for the
issuance of bonds to the resident electors of the City; and
WHEREAS, it is hereby found and determined that
notice of the election was duly given in the form, manner and
time required by law, and said election was in all respects
legally held and conducted in accordance with applicable laws
of the State of Texas and the proceedings calling and
governing the holding of such election; and
WHEREAS, the returns of said election have been duly
and legally made and submitted to the City Council for
canvassing, and the returns, as canvassed and tabulated by
this governing body, reflect that the votes cast and counted
ROLL CALL
RESOLUTION NO. 85-22,
CANVASSING THE
RETURNS AND DECLARING
THE RESULTS OF THE
BOND ELECTION HELD
SEPTEMBER 10, 1985
APPROVED
--
at the election with respect to the propositions submitted
were as follows:
PROPOSITION NUMBER 1
"THE ISSUANCE OF $14,475,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
BONDS FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS"
"FOR" 1,491 votes
"AGAINST" 285 votes
TOTAL VOTES CAST 1,776 votes
PROPOSITION NUMBER 2
"THE ISSUANCE OF $16,870,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS FOR FLOOD CONTROL/STORM SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS"
"FOR"
1,407 votes
"AGAINST"
359 votes
TOTAL VOTES CAST
1,766 votes
-
PROPOSITION NUMBER 3
-
"THE ISSUANCE OF $1,755,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
BONDS FOR FIRE FIGHTING FACILITIES AND
EQUIPMENT"
"FOR"
1,493 votes
"AGAINST"
270 votes
TOTAL VOTES CAST
1,763 votes
PROPOSITION NUMBER 4
"THE ISSUANCE OF $1,900,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
BONDS FOR POLICE/DETENTION FACILITIES"
"FOR"
1,463 votes
"AGAINST"
306 votes
TOTAL VOTES CAST
1,769 votes
September 12, 1985
Page 2
PROPOSITION NUMBER 5
--
"THE ISSUANCE OF $5,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
BONDS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF LAND AND FACILITIES
THEREON FOR LIBRARY/COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX AND
PARK/RECREATION FACILITIES"
"FOR"
1,394 votes
"AGAINST"
373 votes
TOTAL VOTES CAST
1, 767 votes
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
SECTION 1: That all of the recitals contained
in the preamble of this resolution are found to be true
and are adopted as findings of fact by this governing body
and as part of its judgment.
.....
SECTION 2: That it is further found and
determined that the results of the election are as
canvassed and tabulated in the preamble hereof and, a
majority of the electors voting at said election having
voted in favor of propositions numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5,
the City Council is hereby declared to be authorized and
empowered to issue bonds of the City in the amounts and
for the purposes stated in said propositions numbered 1,
2, 3, 4 and 5; all as more fully set forth and identified
above and in the proceedings calling said bond election.
Passed and approved this the 12th day of
September, 1985.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
approve Resolution No. 85-22.
Motion carried 5-0.
4. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to adjourn.
Motion carried 5-0.
September 12, 1985
Page 3
ADJOURNMENT
MAYOR
ATTEST:
--
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~
Department: Planning and Development
Council Meeting Date: 9/23/85
.......
:f Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Master Plan Agenda Number: PZ 85-56
At their meeting of August 12, 1985 the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the
proposed Future Land Use Map to be placed in the comprehensive Master Plan for the City
of North Richland Hills. The map which was under consideration had been revised to
incorporate all of the changes which had occurred as a result of zoning actions taken
since the map had been previously drafted. In addition the Base Map on which the Land
Use was placed was modified to conform to the same base utilized by the Thoroughfare
Plan. The Future Land Use Map is the last element of the Master Plan to be brought up
to date. With the compilation of the following items;
~
~
,
1
¡
,
1
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Future Land Use Plan
Thoroughfare Plan
Master Drainage Plan
Master Water System Plan
Master Sewer System Plan
Park Master Plan
Analysis and Policy Statement
Text,
~r
l¡
1-
i
~.
I
the overall Comprehensive Plan for the City of North Richland Hills is complete and
ready for adoption by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council that
they review and comment on the complete Comprehensive Master Plan. It was also the
Planning and Zoning Commission's opinion that the Plan was ready for adoption should the
City Council choose to do so.
1
ì
I
)
!
I
,
ì
~
¡
r
~i
¡ .~
T
I
L-
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
If 1I1h
t Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~ . .~
Department: Administration
Council Meeting Date: 9/23/85
Agenda Number: PZ 85-100
Subject:
Request of R.G.A. Development Corp. for an
Appeal Hearing
L
~
If Council grants the request for an appeal hearing, the hearing can be heard
October 21, 1985.
"-
Recommendation:
Set date for hearing.
~
L
l-
l
I
I
~
¡
~
i
1
1
1
~
! ~
1
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/A
Sufficient Funds Available
-
-
¿/ -.¿¿
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
t< fI/~
City Manager
, Finance Director
-
Page 1 of
1
'-
"/'
R.G.A DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, .
8053-E Grapevine Hwy, ",
FORT 'NORTH. TEXAS 76118
Iv1etro 498-2203
September l8, 1985
Mr. Roger Lyon
City Manager-N.Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
N. Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: PZ85-100
Dear Mr. Lyon,
R. G. A. Development Corp. wishes to appeal the
Planning & Zoning Boards decision on PZ85-100 to
the North Richland Hills City Council at your earl-
iest convenience.
:;LZY'
G. W. Austin,
President
GWA/bch
City of JX8rth RichlandHills'l Texas
~ ~~
-4f~
September 18, 1985
Memo to: Rodger N. Line
City Manager
From: Denms Horvath
Assistant City Manager
Subject: Briarwood Estates Right-of-Way Acquisition
--........
Reference the attached memo dated August 2,2nd pertaining to right-of-way
acquisition in Briarwood Estates. Our City right-of-way negotiator has been
unsuccessful in his negotiations with the property owner, Mr. Griffin. A
condition set by the Council on the final plat was for the developer to acquire
the necessary right-of-way for Holiday Lane. The remedy to the current
impasse is for the City, at the developer's request and expense, to condemn
the property.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.0. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TX 76118
~ . J ,
. -
~.-~---t.
¡. Department: Planning and D,ev.lopment
l\".3Ubject: Plat A.pp11cat:Lò~ Inatwòod Estates Section 6
I
1
~
~
1
j
I
1
~
t
1
¡
:
J
I
~
1
!
~
T Source óf Funds:
¡ ,
L Bonds (GOm...)
! ! ~~BUdget, ~,', '
~~ ~~,.'
¡ ·otrY,
L-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
,COuncil Meeting Date: .7/22/85
Agenda Number:PS 85-35
This application is preaenteø for Final Plat consideratj;on ~f Briarwood Estates
Section 6. The property is 10eatèd south of Starnes ltóad·'~ east of Douglas Lane.
The property is zone.'ll-2:Single Family. The platpr01>Qs.sa lot layout in
conformance with tþ.e I{....2 crit.eria. '
" :'" -'-,\; " :-.,', ,'. , .' -,', ',- ',' - " :--"'-< - '- - " ''': ' ,'-.~
The Staff and the Cit"In&lùeer noted several coe4u1ltcr. for the Planning and Zoning
Commission considerat1(jn:
(1)
A. small portiOt1.:Q,t tlø.lt4åy Lane is shown on the south end of the plat
connected to,., e. ''t~.d 'plat of Br~ 't..'to the south. 'The plat
proposes an'. . etch removes' the applicant's property.
The applic 'has 8ubm1tto~~the future routing of
Holiday La". ' ,vérifies that the' " ., ~ 'on, the plat will conform
to the Thorøu,hfar. "Ian and will lint up wtth· the' other proposed and
approved suWivt,$.tonsin the area. Høwe '¡,&ihis proposed alignment does
present a01liei·jtfficulties. Most of the: . 'ilht of way, even for the
intersectioltahown the plat 18 off the t's property. The
Commission should' Uarinvok1ng the subdiviø.1ôa provision requiring
the develo,er' to ' t~e eff-site right of way; at:: least to the extent that
the intersection 'seCQred 'and the al:1gnment'isprotected.
(2)
Starnes Road, t8,p~..4.as a four lane Collec:tor Street in the
Tho roughf ar. , 'Ian requiring 70 feet 0$ ript: of wa1and 48 feet of
pavement. 'f,be .1'p!i,cants have indicatetfthei, willingness to dedicate the
necessary ript ofwây and escrow their' 1'ort:l4:>n of t,he funds to improve the
street. Thèplatindicate:s an àdditional dedication of 29.5 feet which
should be aùff1cient.
RECOMMENDATION: Zon.'ing Commiss:1on '.PPí~..d ~he Final Plat of
Briarwood Estates Section , ,e' atipulatiott' th.atthe applicant secure the
off-site right of way aeededto.Cònatruct the Holiday Lane intersection.
"
. Finance Revl.
Acct~Nurnþer ' ,
Sufficient Fond. Available
, Finance Director
, ,
NCIL ACTION ITEM
1
Page 1 o~
','
1
I
I t::::::t:J .----f- ;}-::-I H-; r ì
t-1l ......), N- 'f:BtE:-
ì 11 I I I I I lill f- t-r- _ .. ¡
- -1-1 ~,
-"'--
" . ....
I! I ~ I' ~ I !ti-
::1' I~'d
'R-3 f-J~ ~
.L i H I ~?~ Ø,o--
~ C-2 Dk",;: .«f!3
1-2 I f(~& ~=-
...... : ~
t::í rï , -1- ~ ~
=,:- ¡plY
~
-
',,--
I'"
1= I
'-
jj~~
/'(-2
.r- t- ~¡~
"-
7:
~
r
r, '
~
-':-
!+ai
,
R-7-MF r-"'"'I J I t-
oo I- I r:¡: ~ /f'1-~L.l- t At
Ë f- .v /ïfh- , I II r-r _ , r1::¡ ~;
, -4\1 ~ ~ ~ '-
::;:,.,~ø "",.;oL --' >-+-::::::: = tßm:
r:9 ß(~ , ~ 'T - f:::i::;; ,.~ ,;;
-;:::r ';;;:T , -.-,..., -+- ~ ~ C
¡::= Ë¡:,p- H :::¡ ~:=c ~_\
>:: Ë -:b· ,H R-2 ,¿ §I~
1- n !=;::;' 4' ... H ::¡
- ti r I l::Il-fffi ~:J t- '-"i' -I
¡::= , ~~- if
- ~''1! It, 1;:= . H t= ,
-~ -' J
:-- ~ psss-· / I--
>: ~ .,.. .~. '" ,,- V JlIII
~ '1 1..5e. ~ Hili l.IJ..W.
~. rg. LU I' I I II II! ~r' ie $H~ I 11l,{ffiñf
.- [I]f:..~
I K f , "'I I 1 J ~ "IIi'1 1=7
'R-'-O 1;[., R-3"" :r- ~ Õõ
= 180 IT 1 -
I - l H _..1 ""' 'C-I
AG - AG U"'-h
H ::',,¡2 - '1;1 -u g¡: r¡ ,
¡- :ì+; T;- -< J;:;- n LRJI~~_9': ;¿
'~ L : "'.1 I-- I Ag_2J.. rrm Ij' 1V!~ V / I"""":::
I ,] '; ,,',',~fi:l 1 ,I j " H C-2 li-~ v/~~ =-__
/ ~ IT~I'I': ~', '''l: ~'" >- // / .
· ~ , ., L\ í "in- [-2 ø rsp-,¡;.
'I 4,i+r++ ,~~.w'.è.' ,r-t ...." L.l I ,~I-2 ~ i.~._
_. .- " ,,\ r , I - '[..0 t::::::j '--;;¡- r
I. "ITT " 11/ H -,- _~""~ ~''''''''''''I
¡K 111 " " I Un""", ~ .,. .~ "",,' ""'¿¡ _.~ , _
"" \ :=; II' " I , " - ,,:-;ø ... _ __
j c:=t... '~ / ~ <=µ. r ., , , 'I!L: , " . = J I I
-B ,KI!1= t--H'" ':: 5' '.' --' v;W~ _ _- - --I , rl C-
~~Ï" h,,; I"Á.U 'I, ':J - -.""'. '~;:¡:?"', ,", H C 51j' 0 -, _
~' U 'I'." ~ I ~ -.k
~Y/ ~ M (J.'*"'''' , , '~,fiG' r III
~ HI' , ""'" 71- 1111,.- - ~ t AG C - , i.I.1.-. i>-.'
-¡PI '<:;.): c-¡·1.lD'UJi:: ~ I C-I 1../ "'J r~<\\~.
=Ë \ \:'I0m HI" " , I ' , """ " , '"" LI C-I LL _J'-~~ \
1 \ I r}' fJ....N, . =- '
'\ ~~ '\ AG ~' ~~, 'YO ¡-, C-~:' R-N" AG I
\ '", ~~I I s.U,
\ R-7- .!.-- lRi!z1 =1 I ".. f--
.dß \M~ I LJ ~~'Çt--~_ í
?"'. -{ ~~ ~~~i~\ ~~ ~~
) . ~rr' I~ ~ '
I, ~~-1"
.
1:1Jx:'1- AG
T 1\
-
-
-
- -
-
n',
-
-
I
-
t-~
·25
-
P5~ ... w.
'IT...íš
R-2
lIT,
-- ¡-.-
C-
C-
-
-
I
I'
-
R-2
illS
¡
---J
AG
~-I
=--
'"
T -.2
~
t~
r-
...
1,
,
,
F.p.
..
.
. ,
,
...
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1985
(
(
r
\,--
Chairman Bowen there were two
street nam hat needs to be changed
since ere are already similar ones
e city.
Mr. Long said he would get with the
owner and make the changes.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-33 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
4.
PS 85-35
Request of Alan W. Hamm, Inc. for
final plat of Briarwood Estates,
Section 6.
Mark Long, Engineer, came forward.
,
Chairman Bowen said the proposed
alignment of Holiday Lane has been
accepted by the City Staff and
requests additional right-of-way be
acquired for the alignment so it will
connect to the street"Plumwood".
Mr. Long said Mr. Hamm would have to
addrèss that.
Alan Hamm came forward. He said he
had contacted Mr. & Mrs. Griffin who
have agreed to the alignment worked
out by Mr. Long. He said he asked if
they would agree to dedicate the
right-of-way and also asked them if he
could purchase the right-of-way, but
they did not agree. Mr. Hamm said
they would try again.
PS 85-35
APPROVED
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PS 85-35 and if they can not come up
with the right-of-way, he feels the
City Council should use their
authority and go ahead and approve it.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood
and the motion carried 5-0.
--
"-
I--
-----
~
(
I
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, I NC~
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
June 5, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-847, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BRIARWOOD ESTAfES,
BLOCKS 14 AND 15,
FINAL PLAT,
PS 85 - 35, GRID MAP 150, 591
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 This plan indicates that the future alignment of Holiday Lane will pass
through the southwest corner of the proposed plat. Holiday Lane is shown
to curve northwestward from its intersection with the southwest corner of
the plat across the contiguous F.E. Griffin property. This curved
alignment is not consistent with the alignment shown on the Thoroughfare
Master Plan. We would request that the developer explain his reasons for
proposing this particular alignment and show how it would extend northward
across Starnes Road and ultimately to Bursey Road.
2 We would note that this section of Holiday Lane is designated as an M4U
Thoroughfare. A minimum 70-foot wide right-of-way width is required along
with a 49-foot BIB pavement width. The developer is responsible for
obtaining the full right-of-way width for the section of Holiday Lane
which would be adjacent to his property in accordance with Subdivision
Ordinance requirements.
3 The developer should pay his prorata share of future paving improvements
on· Holiday Lane or construct such improvements at this time. Detailed
plans and profiles of the future Holiday Lane alignment should be
submitted for review.
4 The existing and proposed right-of-way width of Starnes Road should be
noted on the plat. Starnes Road is designated as an M4U Thoroughfare and
the same right-of-way and pavement width requirements as Holiday Lane
would apply along with requirements for obtaining all adjacent
right-of-way for future widening, escrow, construction plan submittal,
etc.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
,
; (
Subdivision Review Letter continued
(
BRIARWOOD ESTATES
'-
5 The developer's engineer should verify that 100-year drainage capacity is
provided in the proposed street within the building setback lines.
Cross-sections and calculations should be provided.
6 The proposed 6-inch water line in Holiday Lane should be changed to an
8-inch water line.
7 We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been
provided for this subdivision based on the 500 foot radius requirement for
residential zoning.
8 The developer should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing
16-inch water line in starnes Road. We would estimate prorata at $5.50
per linear foot for one half of an equivalent 8-inch water line for a
total length of 300.29 feet.
--
9 We would recommend that the proposed 6-inch diameter sanitary sewer line
extension through this property be upsized to an 8-inch diameter to
provide sufficient capacity for future extensions north of Starnes Road,
unless the developer's engineer can provide calculations which show that
the proposed 6-inch line has sufficient capacity to provide service for
the full tributary drainage area based on a minimum of 9.5 people per
acre, 100 gallons/capita/day, peaking factor determined by Harmons
coefficient, infiltration-inflow allowance of 1500 gallons per acre per
day, and if approved by the Public Works Department.
10 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
~Please ~ll if yo.u hav~ any questions.
~~~
RICHARD. L IN, P. .
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
June 5, 1985
PS 85 - 35
PAGE
2
~
, '
1
....
-
\
',--
OweÇl D. Long and Associat¿, Inc.
CONSUL TINGENGINEERS
June 17, 1985
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Briarwood Estates, Block 14 & 15
Final Plat
PS 85 - 35, Grid Map '50, 59'
Dear'Mrs. Cavlert:
We have received the City Engineer's (Mr. Richard Albin, P.E.) letter
dated June 5, 1985, pertaining to the aboved referenced addition and
have the following comments:
1. The developer has talked to Mr. & Mrs. F. E. Griffin and they
prefer the alignment of Holiday Lane to go in front of their
house, instead of in the rear as it would if the projection was
due north. We are enclosing a drawing showing how this aligment
could extend northward across Starnes Road and ultimatèly to
Bursey Road.
2. The Right-of-Way width for Holiday Lane will transition fron 68'
wide to 70' wide thru the curve to the west.
3. The developer proposes to build his half of Holiday Lane as
shown, if this alignment is accept~d by the city.
4. The Right-of-Way width of Starnes Road wi1l be shown on the
Final Plat and the developer will escrow his share of the con-
struction cost at that time.
5. The 100-year drainage capacity will be verified and will be
shown on the plans.
6. The water line in Holiday Lane will be ';ppsized to an 8 inch line.
7. The fire hydrant coverage will be shown on the plans.
8. Statement of City policy on water line pro-rata.
-
1615 Precinct line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst. Texas 76053 / Phone (8171 281-8121
J.
"
1
~r
\.~
"'"
--
..
Mrs. Wanda calve~ - letter
"
June 17, 1985
(
9. After discussing the upslzlng of this line with Mr. Albin, it
was determined that a 6 inch sewer line was sufficient to
provide the capacity needed at this location.
10. Statement of City policy of all city requirements.
Sincerely,
ð ~ j}. I "d';
Owen D. Long, P. E. " .
Consulting Engineer
OOL/am
encl.
cc: Mr. Alan Hamm
TO SEE MAP FOR AGENDA
PLEASE CONTACT CITY
SECRETARY'S
OFFICE/MUNICIPAL RECORDS
I CITY OF
l NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department: Plann1nganò~"'1..pment
lV'ubject:
~
¡
1
I
)
~
I
~
1
~
1v'
¡
,
~
~
1
~
~¡
Finance..ReVi.ew .,
ì Source of Funds: Acct:N.umber
I Bonds (GO/Rev.) ---....... SufficJent Funds Available
1 ,"ngBudge~ "--¡;¡-;t/
y - ~...( ~t~~nature · ~;tyid
I Cð'Y: OQf:JNCIL ACTION ITEM
L ... /
Council Meeting Data: 9/23/85
Replat ADÐ1:tcatlon
Tract AR· & B. Block 2 '
Agenda Number: PS 85-55
Crestwood Estates
This Replat Applic~tionitlpr~s~nt.dfor consideration ofTra~~.AR and B, Block 2,
Crestwood Estates.The~':QPertY~~J()Cated on the southwest.ccrrner of Davis BC)ulevard
and Starnes Road. Thetr"ct ·:ts«:~,:rentlY zoned C-2 Camme'r'«:lal".. The purpose fQr the
prQPosed replat is. to dj:":tdethe~:It:t$ting tract tc) s~parat:e<th.tract on Starnes Road
which belongs to the CitY;'>OfNo,t.'thJ;t:t«:hlandHillsft.'()Iß:her.~:tn~er of the property..
The City is in the proce..of.«:onlJ~X}1ctinga Fire Stat1-0J;lontheproposed Tract B. No
other development oftbe.property:ts~ontemplated atJ:h:tst~lI1tt. . Tþe remaining.
commercial tract was pro"idedWi.th:~eprop.er engineer:tn.Cov~rage ·for development when
it was previously platt..... .. Therefot.'eno additional plansweresub1nitted with this
proposed replat application.. .
RECOMMENDATION: ThaPlanninga~dZ~~1ig C01IImission apprOved;he<Replat Applic~tion for
Lots AR and B, Block 2, CrestW9ðd.>I$t:tt,tes as submitted.
. Finance Director
'<-'4'
"-'.,
'~,~~,~
;:~~,;.;¡> ~"
';;.:0;''>,)
"X.,<f: ':"'i·-ie.',
.. .. :"::<!::-,:f!:¡~tÄ,,:;-~:";:O
?,h:;Y/T:,,;.,.~¡+~,};.';',r
\i·"'·~.i-:'-·".<
':"\i..<,:,-,{...,,;
Page 1 of 1
,
'~~"~:;;;Ji;d.;,~'~:,~\.:-::Ù
-:\~~~,':.?Xi*t:,,)..i'-< ~:,
't'..5( t>,·., -,,~;;- ,:,'0- ;:\~r
:~-~
, ,
- g.ffi.:. w - ~
..........~~ t- AG
-...-~ - f--
rl't::ì:J t::D1L - '-
-~~l )1~i$I;
. II 1'1 ïïll'" ¡..J L:¡'! '-f-ï::1.œ ¡
~ .~ 'I t:t:::
~
,
.'
-
- -
r-
~.i(~ ....-',.
o;¡"lf. O.£C:$
-
---
R-2
"~I
Lr-
IPS r~·~'
~A t OAG
E!oT. $'Z.
l't, ~~~ ~~
P".ø,'Jjl. 'fp\
&.10; ~!.'2'=ià""00
1178
.
-
.,
----
----
- .....
,
RI
_ '¡ ,II;
n ..:::,- r ~Ti II II I;::
........ --'~-f'M\ ill ~
'~~æ3¡-
I I -~~ t::
. ~
t::\- ~
-
, '
s
~
-r~
-.
'.
. I
11\
-l~- .J '-
---1C "--
.~
~,
.":
~
/1 l 1-
f-Ì~
T '..~
'-C-I
~
--;.!~
- - -~
>--.R4
'---
1/7
þ\...
AG
R-3
'LJ
C-2
.
1
IIoGtr.'..· [UI .......
~8~-3J \
CHA5EWM:ø A1:>oW.
.~.¡~ S
R-2
1175
¿Ç-I S. U.*
~ ~
1
I H)j<~TI T
l [70"~ - -
¡i:~~'
,; ,)'4'-
. '/-
~
I I
1_1
~1
U-
-
III
I
-
-
I
Á.l..
I / _ 0'
I I T I
14 AG II,;-CT ,,7J~+ ,~~_
I: III \ '. ' ",.J^i.1"-..... ï
."\ c- sU.· , R-I . ;/d f-
I ;-~ r ~~~~;; ~ C~=~3-
h f1W'~1r' "L: t:31OífÆ1~ ~ <-J... 1 2000
J 1- 21 C-2 tt-ð:>k~ _ __ _<-j;¡...i-_ !- or-- ~; L
.. ::....\~~=- -- /, I~ - ~"i' ""'iT ;:
r--:'--. '1.R92=- T , ;::: h j- ! W .1, 1.. 1 t-
t-' n >:~ R I.. I a:u- .,:,;-~!...c""~ .
C - I- - ,,\' =' >- 'f" , IJ I l 'T 1/!",---¡..:::r-
1-' __ 7-' I- K\ i IT, : ,~~ I--::i." '\ ~ I-AJ
¡ .. " - I ~~ /y( T:::!J ,*.rr'~~/~-!ë"Q/dtL""':-n R-
- 1 I I ~.. f ,:....:: ~
~, ';'1"'& ~ L:=-T'-;';-;- ~t~;f
R-E/'f:: ~\CE ~ ," LR =, ~ ; ,
I rç: J iTfl' I AG C- -j '"ff!#.._::t.r /'
-_-_ - _'~_,,,~ / ) ~0lU I IT' I
\ :::::::: " ::;:: . --- ev' j ~",~ çrj
1-1- ± -
~~I''-r-
;:::~ -¡- ~ Ir I
>:;;:':;:- I- ~ C-I c- fi~ \--,~\\ u::.;:
/ / \. ~.,'" ,~
~ '
v/ ::: ll>"~...........
L-L- /f'L == Ù~~
ì7 ........ ê-= r"-' .....~ :J..{..:!' ~'
t-'-""'r' - '- - I ~ TI I: I I \
;, = = t- I
. :\} _ m ,
,.. ''''' TTTT I __.,. - : I' J
. ~i i iil I/! i II
I I II <>
Î V r ~ ~ ~J I~~ f~~ ~tS"t ~1 : ¡ II I
íiI:¡qi'è. ¡'; I IR .'
~r,sõ í/
=
1--- ...:..
k-
V-
n-[
·1
f
¡¡
'-
'-
- I' I 1 I, ,-:-11,
AG
I...~ þoø esr.
/.¡.;ís
rR-2
117'
......¡....-ffi
;=1=-
I-- ¡""i- ;m:¡:¡ ~
¡-
-
r
=!=h
--'- T
~~~
:::- I,~~
- --
r
r
II
t-
"-
c' _I
R-2
I/IB
=
"
AG
ï
=H
- 'I -
- '"J.,.'. IT, -
- 'T P$ BS
~ IAí I .jI~
~ L.&8
, .. Co-/6
1:-
:¡-
~ I 17ttr I
-. _IE
\~_I_ I
1800 l..'.b,
T
--r
AG LiJII/
[, "
C-
R-7-MF
..
±
.hi
I -....,..:::
T
AG
R-2
-
I
i
AG~~
~I~
~ ' ~I
I--.~
\L...LlI U LM-D~
~
-
I R-31157
¡- f"S . ~·44
~AW~ ~.(4¡IoWS
(
(
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
SEPTEMBER 12, 1985 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
/'
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF AUGUST 22, 1985
-~
1.
PS 85-54
2.
PS 85-55
PS 85-55
APPROVED
~ ~""".- -to -.t".-_ ._
The meeting was called to order by the/
Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M. //
./
./
/'
PRESENT: ///
Chairman Don Bowen
Secretary John Schwinger
Member ~rk Wood
Alt. Member ~ ~arole Flippo
Dir. Planning/Dev", Richard Royston
P & Z Coordinatdr Wanda Calvert
/
/'
ABSENT: /'
/
~pþroval of the minutes was postponed
~ùntil the next meeting.
Marjorie Nash
Joe Hallford
Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture
for preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block
7, Richfield Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-54 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0.
Arno14 Pent came forward. He stated
the applicant should be Campus Hills
Joint Venture instead of G. L.
Cummings, Jr.
Request of John Barfield, Herman
Smith, and the City of North Richland
Hills for replat of Tracts AR & B,
Block 2, Crestwood Estates.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PS 85-55. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion
carried 4-0.
(
,)
I.
'O(",.~~
1
2
1
-'
,
4
5
"-
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, J NC.
CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth· Dallas
August 12, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-871, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CRESTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION,
TR. AR1, AR2, BLK. 2,
REPLAT,
PS 85 - 55, GRID MAP 52
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat.
The telephone numbers of the owners should be noted on the plat.
In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation
should be noted on the plat.
All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in
accordance with standard City procedures.
As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Plea~:;; ~.
RI~~RD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
1901 CENTRAL DR.. SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
.;
('
Subdivision Review Letter continued
(
CRESTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
-",..,
August 12, 1985
PS 85 - 55
~~""..' ....It- ~~,,,,,,,,~.~,:,,,,,._<, ;~¡,:¡..".,.'~.~.
PAGE
2
('
(
~avid C. Moak, R.P.S.
.-'President
David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc.
Registered. Public Surveyors
\\. .'
\~,
.
· Subdivisions
· Loan Surveys
· Topography
· Construction Layout
· Acreage
August 16, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Attn: Wanda Calvert
RE: 3-871, City of North Richland Hills
Crestwood Estates Addition,
Tr. ARl, AR2, Blk. 2,
Replat,
PS 85 - 55, Grid Map 52
Dear Ms. Calvert:
We've received the City's Engineers comments and offer the following response:
I-The only signature missing is the City of North Richland Hills, the owner of
Tract AR2. I assume this will be taken care of through your department.
2-We've added the telephone numbers of the owners, under their name and addresses.
3-We've added a circular dot for each property corner which is found in the legend
in the title block (lower right hand corner).
4-1 assume you have circulated copies to each of the utility companies.
5-The developers are aware of City policy pertaining to these items.
Respectfully submitted,
f¿~(';p~
R.P.S. 11156
DCM/ d t
105-B Bedford Rd. · Bedford, Texas 76021 . Metro 268-2211 . (817) 282-0401
_ 7_j~~~~:;:.';,":,
~_""",.....~;.¡t.,.~....
l~t; ,
¡ '':~'~f~~;t1,~~-~~ ~~¿-~~~~:~...~ø~ ~r~ "" ~~"'.
'. ,-" '..~. . .-
.-. -,~_,' .Ii' ,
.....;..,- ~J:....~-{ !'~~.-.J~~;"t. ';r"!1."'-:;"\~:t"è~ ,~:; <ff",t-.~ . ~- -~ .-¡ _.. "';'.- ~,- \ _ _., ;',,'¡',¡ :'i,- It :'. ".._: .
. ,-
~ CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
, Planning and Ðevelopment
I Department:
I
TL 'ubject: Plat Application "Block 6, Meadow Lakes AdcU:.ttôn Agenda Number: PS 85-58
~ This aepla t Applica U01\is pr..,¡....ti\<l for cotÌaidet a U01\ of Block 6. Meadow Lake.
Y Addition. This is an exilJ1:tng1:esidential. subdivision\l.nder construction on the south
side of Me..adow L.akes D.riV.·...e...·at....t,h. e,.'>tntersection of RU.fe........'.s,ow. ....D...r...·.iv..e. The purpose for the
proposed replat is to,reaJ;ign the lot lines on the plat to correspond with the actual
! construction accomplishe40n'the.site. Apparently an error,.- made in the initial
T staking of the lots and ...t...h. e a.'......P...l...1..c.....an.......t........i..S Dlaki...n.g. the.correc...tiO. n...·..·.......i.n...the plat to compensate
and show actual lot dimens:l.onsas.thê,.èxist ontheground.Tlteproposed lot changes
will continue to confom to the1Qin!tlûm lot criteria for the R-l Single Family
! Residential zone.
r
i
r
. 9/23/85
Council Meeting Date:
r
t
r~
I
r
Since the City's original apprOval of. ,the plat for thispropert,. the Thoroughfare Plan
for* the City has been officially adopted. In that plan Rufe, Sftow Drive has been
proposed as a five lane undivided Collector Street. To accomplish this construction
will require the acquisition of additional right of way from. the adjacent properties.
The City Council shouldconsider·wbetbet it is appropriate to require that the
additional right of way sbould be exacted from this plat. No reference is made on the
proposed plat as to the existing rigbt of way on Rufe Snow Drive. Therefore the Staff
was unable to make a determination as to the additional right of way required.
RECOMMENDATION: The Plann:tng and Zoning Commission approved the Replat Application on
Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition assubm:ttted.
r
r
F,nanceRevlew
Source of .Funds: Acct. Numbel
Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ SufficIent Funds Avallåble
Operating Budget _ '. .' .... . "
~¥¿~~gna~N æ~
L ~- CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE.M
. Finance Director
L
Page 1 of
-. ..... . ¡
, I U.IJ, IG.J
;. ../ /' !. '. '¡i, LL! 'Yi~·iïTD.H Root
--; ~ 'r ~w ';.... i~ :.-\V~~:'-K ''j-
- a ttt:u3 . ,1.1'---, '=' "'"" -1ffi IT,;--,-,: '=.<':\;",. ~ C-' .
H ). ~;:lei--,-; .,,, . I JJjt , .. ,hjJ I I=>i=E I <~ R=*= ~ \Fç?f;: x , ~. .
~'v~~~-~. ...,. ----;; "1- CL ~ iF=$E~.,t¡~~,!E
:--;v_ . 1-& r- rJ ~J .<=k~ ,.~llim· ~~n;P-ïï'4 J
t rs '~'4' ... . ...... "ï " -w ;~..ç~~ '~,
. .....T~~~..,~, ;. -." 'J1l ''''~~~; 'ti:J .--rt::J7i >¡.
,.S 0, S. '. ~ "" ". . .s," ' .......... ~ . , ~ ".
e.3 I t~5\q A .' "...,~ "... "'."-1. = . :;--µ ~ b -, ,. ~ '2...(
R-3 , ' . "I.:t';¡';~~ Ri;f..... . H--$" ~\\\.j ,
".....~,.. '\ · · , C::J1+i i;k:"";n" G \---1':
m'~r::iœ P .-£L
i I C-' '"-' '-;' . ,,:, I' " 'i ¡ il- I I I J ,\
~ ~5 I .,U, ~ . w::.!! C"
I .. ~,..,. , --To _~ f-¡
- ....,:~. tj"" ~¡::¡- J... .. ~.... /
C-2 :-r-, ."1 R-7-MF R. r'FF F l.N.... ".../
I .LL .5,;h- "1 FF t: _~. ~,,, ,
4 !::-, I ï 'f-T z:r r--........ \ "
'f . . Wt--t- ~ ~, l \ R
J I 2 ""i. 1 . ::::1'r-d " ~ ~~:¥' \.
-~ ~¢->su. -. 'R,R::.'- =~ .' \'. "
~ ...:>-~ R'> t--õ , , I..", I ~
~, ":,1- 19 -¡. ~, y ~.
- sr-, l~,~ l ì Llß.:
R-7-MF 1s4,,,, C-2- /:/ ffi' C
C-2 LS1l ==== SU" f ' iJ .'CHLA.. t "-::-~!
- , I C-2 ,,,. . L .... '" ,
- ¢.!= . ,. '$'" R-7-MF, .,_, '::;-=--
;Sl ,.~ --r~"i'" , . U ~_
~6;:;;t11".... ~I':¡V~' I I' ~~ I~
/1 " H- c-
o _........... . ,- >-
LR S.U., ......... L.~ 1 .1.
. >o~ I~' ~
'..: IILR I ~;; ~'~1.~,~~! ,TIII'-';.!' II ì ~ .
--, - -;¡;fil11' ,-I." "1 I ~.! LlI II' /.~~,
~ 'TT'r- T I I ....,. 'l · X . L uÝ', "]2.
d - 2 II . - I TI /" ~ ....,.. Z·:¡:' '-r-. ~ -., '"'i.;:::: t- , :::c~, rJ
~ ~ ..,. W '" I I J-j.-I-< L-4-- r T l'¥;: _' ! ,,~"": ~
-- 'PO -- 1--"", ~---;;n.:¡;..~,. ,'1 . I; 0-- f-f":'- rn:r \' 'TI.LL =! '1QIl.!.
u ~ ø ~3.J - e·. IÎ';' I "'~rr' I' J \ :'Tlr+1~ K . 'i
- '~.. 'í\ \.'{- ~q j 0-- ::s:z:: ;:.. rrttlrrrrr ;::: I H-n-r I' T r-t-1' H-:'--' ":f" ~
\ ~y~ ~ LH - t '-'--7" I --1::J - I ::::." Irf . II J.q¡.. ::- :=::' ..;- . . '"
..,.~!! )¿--'-t.j/.Æ . "''''' ..~, , . '.. I<'t. II" ~ 1---!. -'--- _
~ I· · '~J:- '.. .... .."'.~ .~, 1m.. '~.lJ T' ;::!
7§j:; .... · ,'(' t: --- ,:~tfi:'~I'! ....... '" _ ~ t, I I I II ¡j.u . ,r
; 0 .Y 1t·.L > S~-,,. " " IUb:ttrr.u, , '..k I ! I,
~-- nTll ~,t .~ .. " =1. mii"fîlrT: II II '-T ..D-
ç~o, 11 I II L ~ iT! '..0; 'IH I~: T I :r .-+--," j ¡::\:::
,: ~ --<- I IT LU= 't J 'H . >--' ...1- ~'\.'j-,~ L f-
_-.-T-PD . '<~." ==EfHm. 1= ,,,,.;- I> "t"-Im:::::";"'- i~'-æ[.[-
!'~ :::=:tJ.i.l.l,U\= T I I, , 'L--~,-- -->.Ví' . '--.
..r - ~\3(I1ìfrTTrry6L:::TI:\, ~II, II u.m:rt :. . /~¡-,-, ___ 17lTl.
:TI"" ' -.. ~r\ - 'T'::r III f- T..' ..~ m Iii ~~\. . IT' I.J~
~ñ'l;. I. lL r'T' °lm TC, LL1:±JUJl:ô.. '. nTH II
· - " ~R H I U I r- _LU:I.I I Ll J n-".-f-'ffl-,-,,¡ EillJJJII±] ~
-. .:¡-¡-.- ';rT""~ ...JL--. 11111111J~Rit +H'1 T \
h r T , -'-'l~t~· " I I IT, ! ! í \ 1:±!J ----i=' '. I T I _ I . I I I --.
---- L~'DT r II - T , 1 I. I' L-J : "; II í I,
' -·-.~~Hjµ~' ...!-,ILIIj- rr JJ.lT1Fttt ¡I -jJ-'.L.J1- '--Iê£1- ,I' I IL~ III ¡....:..,
-.... .t---. TTTTT,r '" I fll " 1 L. ! ~ 7 T~ ' .....
\ 'I' ,--' ,-" 'TT I; ID~I , - T J' 1" ITL¡~ --"-LJ / ,(4" 11 i.-
\ . j-- )'1. . " I!: 1 I T 11-1 = -l ,l./' , t R
~ .' I I I III f11illl -'--'~t---> ~~~
- \ ~ r..JR I / ....." . . : . , w to:;:::! "
. . r' I 0,--< R-7-M' . 1,'=i~'t'1 r ~,J+-I.- ....., "7 I
;, ·.,.iit f-- ¡- _," I:] :j..- 1--1" ']:3 ~
':d~}"C <'--' IJ j ,,- . ~~~".. 't-IOr-t:.-It-::L., I J
~ ,¿:; 1, P'v I C -, C·, t T i , H1:.;;.. .""'"
. , ítT:IT I II ~ I I
~ /" .
-
-
::. --
--
----......
-
'~~t'.
'"
.
""
-
-
.
/.
-
-I-
""
-
( ,
r
C-2
I ,
-
C-2
.....! 164
I
- ...
.......
-
Page 2 ~
P & Z Minutes
September 12, 1985
-
3.
PS 85-58
PS 85-58
APPROVED
(
Request of Johnston & Son Construction
Inc. for replat of Block 6, Meadow
Lakes Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-58. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
4-0.
4.
PS 85-59
/
-.~~_.. .....
Request of Stanley M. Peskind and
Lawrence R. Burk for preliminary plat
of Lot 2, Block 2, and Block 3, Tapp
Addition. //
,-
/
John Burgess with Carter and ~urgess,
Inc. came forward.
/
./
Chairman Bowen asked about the small
piece of land at the~šoutheast corner
of this property ~håt was separated
from this property by the TESCO
transmission ~{~e. He said he
requests they plat this property or
".
give it t6 the city for street right
of wa~./'"
/
M . Burgess stated that had been
iscussed for a right turn, but it is
,in limbo at present. He said they had
thought about putting a sign on it.
Chairman Bowen said it was not shown
as part of this plat.
Mr. Burgess stated that was an
oversight and would be corrected.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-59 subject to the Engineer's
comments and subject to the owner
granting to the city the southeast
corner of his property which is cut
off by the TESCO transmission line.
This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo
and the motion carried 4-0.
-------
i
I
¡
¡
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-E NC LISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 12, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-912, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MEADOW LAKES ADDITION,
BLOCK 6,
REPLAT,
PS 85 - 58, GRID MAP 120
--
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 The scale of the plat should be noted.
2 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in
accordance with standard City procedures.
3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy"requirements as written in the regulatory
codes. '
Please call if you have any questions.
~.t{1.~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
~~:-......~ ..... < \fI.f""'........;:..J;..:.:.~,~ .......,....,,.. ..... '.'
(
,
Rady & Associates, Ine.
Engineers· Architects· Planners
August 21, 1985
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
Attention: Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
RE: Meadowlakes, Block 6
North Richland Hills, Texas
R&A Job No. 8510
PS 85-58
Dear Ms. Calvert:
In response to the comments in the letter dated August 12, 1985, from
Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc., I offer the following:
1. The scale of the plat has been added.
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours, '
RADY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
~ úJ. 7t/~
Stanley W. Mabee, P.E.
SWM/ pb
910 Collier Street Fort worth. Texas 76102 817/335-6511
·.~ß~. ~~.."......~.-.,__.~..~-,.........-: .-_ . ,1..." "
-----
·-,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning andI}ev~l()pment
Council Meeting Date: 9/23/85
Ljubject: ReQuest for Variance-to S1Rn Ordinance Agenda Number: SO 85-12
Federal Sign Compan, ofAr11nlJ~on.has submftteð a request for variance to the Sign
Ordinance for the Tony Roma's ll,st4U,,4nt site ~t8010 Bedford Euless R.oad. The
applicant is requesting,appr()valfor~ocat10n.of two ground sips on the lot, one each
on the Loop 820 frontag~,aitdth.BedfDrd Eules$Road' frontage~ The Sign Ordinance
I prescribes in Section 4 ..2 that only one ground: sign is allowed for each lot of less than
L, 300 foot frontage.' ,
I I The Staff has been preserttedwithan4pplication fòrtheêonstruction of the two signs.
¡ In the review of that application seve~al items were noted for City Council
1 consideration:
¡ (1) The main pylon sign <is to be>locatedortthe ~oop820 írontage. This sign is
L., proposed to be 160 squarefee-tin. .81. whichi$ .1n..o_l1anceWith the Ordinance.
I However, the sign is shown at .alocation on the property U~newhich would restrict the
I,· maximum height to twenty-fiv.e feet. ¡The proposed height on the application is 42 feet
requiring the sign be set backanàd4itional 17 feét, from the property line.
L1 (2) The proposed 1~t1on sft¥ llign on the L""" ./lZOfr"!'tsge will place 1t 1n
future jeopardy when th.modif1cat.;io~ to the Bigh:wayInterchauge are begun. It is
expected that additional righto!:'wayWill be required in order tð'expand the Service
I Road/Ramp improvements in thiS area. . The . City . Council may wi$h to consider requiring
~ the applicant to agree. t...o.........r..em.. ov.' .....e.. O.r......... r.e....locate t~. eprò".sed s1gn at his own expense at
'-'" such time as the righto,f> way.Ürequred. This would preclude the sign becoming a
bargaining issue in the value of the property.
~ (3) The second sign proposedf.o:r ,Bedford E1ilessR.oad is 48 square feet in size and
15 feet tall. These size~are well~thintheparameter80fthe size of allowable
ground dgns. The CHy.1!óund1 is _re thst .ever.1 'sf :the restsursnts in this sres ae
¡ . well as the motel have second.si8nsow Bedford EulessR.oad.
1 RECOMMENDATION: The Staff'1sof tt..eopinion t1!latthere1sprecedent for the approval
¡ of this request for two ØtoundSignsø.tthis l~cation. It is recommended that City
1 Council inform theapplicantoftbe future rigñt of way considerations for Loop 820 and
take appropriate steps to require the removal óf thes1gx1at the applicants expense at
~ such time ss the right óf way ls.requlred.
~
, Finance Aeview
1 Source of Funds: . .... . .' Acct.NJmbe~
~ËI~gO;>Z~ ....:.. SUfflC~IFUØd~I"b~~
~ -sr Æ-. DS~I HøådSIIJlllll~ .. ..... ... c~anager
r '·.OI'1"¥CtJtJNCIL ACTION ITEM
L..
. Flnançe Dlreçtor
Page 1 pf
1
III FEDERAL
SIGN '
Division Federal Signal Corporation
.,,-
September 3, 1985 .
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills
7301 North East Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas
RE: Tony Roma's, 8010 Bedford Euless Road
Dear Sir:
I would like to request that we be included on the agenda
for the next City Council Meeting for the purpose of an
ordinance change concerning the free-standing signage at
the above referenced Tony Roma's location.
Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this
request.
{dial~ ,~
~ rat&t?$/
im Callicott
Sales Representative
JC:gh
"-
P. O. BOX 6069, GREATER SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK . ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 . PHONE (817) 261-2341
'-
r
r~\
~, ~
r~
;ty
~
',,1'
~
.)\
.~~
l~
r-'~
,~ ~ .
t'
o
~~
.
'"-
.
If
~.
~,~
.
;"f
t......
.
-
I
\
-
.
I
/
, t
I
~'
,.t:
~
~
. w'.o;;.-
. .. ."'1.
-
I
--
-
-
-
,.
-,
-
.-
r-
....
(S~
~
~
~~
c;) .
()
-
,~
~
o~t
~.
-~
..~
-~
I
>,,~ '
;:11:1.", ,
"n 'I ip~ i
U I ~CD~
: ~Or-
, ->c
-_ _ f J i2gf!!
o gmfA.
-\\~~
, ...
'-....-.
,..~t:l:í K~ ~f~V-:
~ ": . i t ~t..
Ii':' ¡;^'It:i ~"-I
t.\\'¡,¿A'Jí' 1"1¡.¡{4~
r-At..f¿r·" :z.~~
f~)('
¡j:.;~::
: !
';' i~ :-
>, '., ["C,
'~~
---.".-.'-jg. ;"
,".,!.'Ii
~ '
¡"~1<
1':;-
¡:;;V
---.-----
-r-
f'.,.k:.t:.. ,·'At.o.,,-'
'I~'" ,~T.¡ \V4t·~ ;..;\4-..;
'''''''><-<1' f"'"
':'í4.f'G. ....,~ ·..if'I,:....
1 ¡'J.., 1\ "~I. ¡ tff" ;,\t.u..¡
1"r HM"H ~... ,,'¡"¡~:,
p ÌOI.' ":-E: I ~
¡
¡
¡
i
.A
,.,..,..,8
C
'D .
.... .", -....-
,. .-
-...4--..__ .
- ..---.--- ---- .----._--
"0.
('¡~A' Htm /i:'~,
VA:~<',rT' H ",i"""
,-'\AI"-i ,;:..¡1.
"
... ---....--.-. ---
-.~--
.~~y ,
. .--'.- --_._~._--
t
"
\
,
. ..
! :;0"';; -;. ........r.:::.
-11-_-
- -.;:;¿¡:".~ ~~--
\V:IIt5-~::::
,
~,.,."
,.
:cl:.;:x FÄ::.= .
,~
5< ~-:- ~ ,>....'
+-... ..- .
'...
i
---/ ~--
'----- -
..
_..
"~_4_ __
-- - -,
..---,---+,_....~
i
I .-
\1 '/
)~::
.- .~-------_._-
--..' ~ - ----.-
--- -
---,----. ---.--.
----
.-----------------. -
"-
¡<
II
CJ
~.P~
-- -"-_.------..,~.
~p
..
...;
:.._.,~< -
.. ~'"'-,;",,,,"~
\v¡;R{~
c~ l;fe-
\V/ ,~4 ~¡;;-
'-'<;:"'\...ì ',u..u\-'l.
tl.u:'tl"O:ll ~~
"""~t.A.~¡:;"->
M.M£: JA" :t.C?;t7 t;" fí ¡.¡.
WI{,
~ !l1'1.k¿1 r
IX'Kr~ 1T
I'A'Z!k 2.'1'1!7
rt-:? f'1t >+ .y:ú
~¿J_,~'''''
I>
¡,~
i~----~
)
/
---.
. -é~~,~:.:lt',:·_j-i~~~~~~t·_~:i'T4;~·~~·i, ,\~' }"-".,
Ø14~ :V~i' ~m:l.
WI r::.;.,.f, 1'.."87 .;'4 I£.
r\..~x ,rr1,
+__.._.·._r
.(·n~~J.,.. ..~/f~~/
A:;.. f1tÙ?f? '1';' ",æ;:
r~,\~..~\>' '\' ¡-¡:,)~¡;
tr 1-I~\.1 :J.r);1-þ
.·~Eíto..L
'~r
I
L
i
~
f
!
J
,
~
l
~-
(
I
I
~
~
I
~
~
)
~
1~-
I
~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works COuncil Meeting Date: 9/23/85
Request of Irviug·..'t'ove..,..of Williamsburg Assocutes,
Inc. for Twó Ðr1:vewalOpemngs on Rufe Snow Agenda Number: GN 85-88
Subject:
A developer has purchasad apar:c::el of land from aJlarlaT tract of land at the southwest
corner of Rufe Snow and Industrial Park Blvd. Theparcal<nàs465 feet of frontage along
Rufe Snow and is appro: Cimåtely 200 feet deep. ThtJlj)1merhassubdiv.ided thi$ land into
three separate lots an~has asud for two dr:(veways to be split equally between the
three lots.
,- - ,
The developer has been advised that we are attempting to JDainta1n a standard of one
driveway for every 500 feet or ma~ør,portion thereof where a tract of land is taken from
a larger tract of land. There is still quite a bit.of land left in this tract after
this developer removes his lots from the larger tract. There is also approximately
another 500 feet of f1'ontáge on Rufe Snow for the la1'g.1' tract of land and sèveral
thousand feet of frontáge on Industrial Park Blvd.
The developer has submitted to'the Public Works Department. a traffic study which was
done by Barton-Aschman AssOC1ate8~ Inc. of Dallas, Texas. The report states that two
driveways would not have a negative effect on the tl'affi~ on Rufe Snow. This is not
believed to be correct, because all openings onto Rufe Snow have a negative effect on
the traffic.
By way of comparison. the OUtlet Malls of America Shopping Cènter and four fast food
restaurants share onee1.'ltr,ance, which is at ~ewisll1:'i'Ve. The previous south. entrance to
the Outlet Mall, which has recently been closed. hadå<high accident rate. As a matter
of fact, there were 43 aecidentsatthat dri"eway in one. year and seven of these
accidents were major innature.Tti1s single ,entrance does nøt appear to have been
detrimental to these busineS8e$.~d it is beJ;ieved that it would work for the subject
property at Industrial Park Blvd. and Rufe Snow.
Further, the owner of the tract of land at the northwest corner of Rufe Snow and Loop
820 has about 1,000 feet of frontagè on RufeSnow and ,he was required to spend over
$100,000 to put in new signals and to tie the signals together plus widening of the
lanes in the area of McDonalds in order for him to have one entrance onto Rufe Snow.
In addition, on Rufe Snow north of Chapman on the ,east side of the street there are two
developers at this time tT)'ing to develop shopping centers with almost 1,400 feet of
frontage on Rufe Snow each. They haVe been told that they may have three driveway -
openings for the 1,400 feet.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City C,ØU11cil deny :thè request for two driveway openings onto
Rufe Snow.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ ' Sufflciènt Funds Available
Operating Budget _ . I
~her~nt~~ . ~I~~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION iTEM
, Finance DIrector
L
.-.-~
-(
WILLIA~ISBURG ASSOCIATES, INC.
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
SUITE 660 eLB-68 -4144 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
D,\.LLAS, TEXA8 7'3204
',,-
(214) 821-0396
IRVISG ~I. GROVEPI. III
PR¡';SIDEST
August 30, 1985
Mr. Rodger Line
City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Curb cuts to Lot 2R, Lot 3 and Lot 4 located at the southwest corner
of Rufe Snow Drive and Industrial Park Boulevard, Industrial Park
Addition in North Richland Hills, Texas
Dear Mr. Line:
The purpose of this letter is to present the request of the owners of Lots 2R,
r 3, and 4 in City Block 7, Industrial Park Addition of North Richland Hills,
Texas for curb cuts for access to Rufe Snow Drive from these lots.
A copy of the plat approved by the North Richland Hills City Council on August
26, 1985 is included as Attachment 1. As indicated thereon, I am the owner of
lots 2R and 3 of this addition. Lot 2R currently is under contract for sale to
Kentucky Fried Chicken. Williams-Silverthorn Development Company, Inc. is the
owner of lot 4 of this addition.
I have met on two occasions with Mr. Gene Riddle, the Director of Public Works
for the City of North Richland Hills, concerning curb cuts for this property.
He has informed me that only one curb 'cut will be allowed for all three platted
lots. He explained his reasoning for this conclusion as follows:
o
More curb cuts are more dangerous than fewer curb cuts; and
o
The City has an unwritten policy that only one curb cut is allowed
for every 500 feet along Rufe Snow Drive.
In response to Mr. Riddle's comments regarding the issue of safety, I engaged
the nationally-known traffic consulting firm of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
Their assignment was to recommend that number and placement of curb cuts along
Rufe Snow Drive which would, in their opinion, satisfy the dual objectives of
(1) orderly development of the property and (2) reasonable access and sufficient
distances between the access points to allow safe and orderly traffic flow.
The owners' original desire was to obtain three curb cuts, one for each platted
-( lot.
-r
Mr. Rodger Line
August 30, 1985
Page 2
'-
A copy of Barton-Aschman's technical memorandum is included as Attachment 2.
Based on their professional analysis of the area's traffic flows and the pro-
posed uses of the lots, they recommend two curb cuts for the three lots. They
conclude that "... two access drives will not cause any detrimental affect along
Rufe Snow Drive." The placement of these two curb cuts is indicated in
Attachment 2, with the northernmost cut some 120 feet south of the intersection
of Rufe Snow Drive and Industrial Park Drive. Further, they state that "any
further reduction of the number of access drives will not provide sufficient
access to allow the properties to develop in a quality manner and should not be
considered."
In order to test the success of Mr. Riddle's policy on one curb cut
five hundred feet of frontage along Rufe Snow Drive, I have driven the
that road from Interstate 820 to Bursey Road a number of times.
my conclusion that, given the number and distance between these curb
this unwritten policy has not been applied in an entirely consistent manner.
for every
length of
It is
cuts, that
Mr. Line, I desire to develop this land so as to ensure that the safety
citizens using my development and Rufe Snow Drive is not impaired. I
that our proposed plan using two curb cuts will satisfy this objective.
allow only one curb cut will present the following problems:
of the
believe
To
r
o Barton-Aschman Associates has indicated
actually be more dangerous than two, as
for a longer period of time going into
increasing congestion and driver anxiety.
orally that one curb cut may
traffic is required to queue up
and out of the site, thereby
o If placed in the center of the parcel, the impulse-driven patrons of the
Kentucky Fried Chicken establishment wi._ be required to travel some 220
feet beyond that establishment to access the facility. This, in my Opi-
nion, renders the corner lot, (2R), virtually useless for its highest and
best use as a fast food, convenience store, or gasoline service station
operation. As evidence of this, Kentucky Fried Chicken has indicated that
it will break its contract with me if one curb cut is not allowed
somewhere along its frontage. I am not as confident as Mr. Riddle that
" someone will buy the property" within a reasonable period at its
proper price if this contract were to fall through.
o The owner of lot 4 indicates that a
property will not adequately service
ment, given its impulse nature.
tenants have indicated that if this
their lease commitments.
single curb cut in the center of the
his auto sales and service develop-
In fact, certain of his prospective
occurs, they likely will not honor
-I'
_._-_.~-_._- -_._-
-r
Mr. Rodger Line
August 30, 1985
Page 3
'-
o Finally, my attorney finds no City Ordinances which gIve Mr. Riddle the
authority to arbitrarily limit access to the three parcels.
In summary, to arbitrarily limit the right of access to the three lots will
cause unneccessary traffic congestion, severely curtail access to the property,
create an inefficient access system as compared to the recommendation of my con-
sultant, and cause great economic detriment to both owners of the subject pro-
perty. For these reasons, I believe it is in the best interest to the
development of the property and for the City of North Richland Hills to follow
the recommendation of the professional transportation planner and allow two curb
cuts as recommended in the enclosed study.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
p.
no.'
Irvmg M. Groves, III
,
Enclosures
IMG/ln
-;
/-,,-- ;D A ~\<.
/~ 1 f\ L r
, .---/? -(" \ 5 89°q2'2011 E
// \) V _OZ60.00 qq. 36' r
I t1 ~- 1&' ...... --/ / """P.O. ~
\-~.~..'2.05 . '- 1:5 ' BLDG:-LINEl o!
/- -------~.......... ---'--¡ ~
,,'" ~~ I'
ç jig
~ 1°
~ LOT 2R æll~
,/ . a!!? ,
./ / ZONED - 1-2 __
Y~ 2ô. 302. 0.9.99 SQ. FT. 1&.1 , I
(06038 AC.) 1&.1
'/-
~,.,/ /
~~'~"
~-
?".21') I
. «-+~~ '..: I I
//~t?~ 2 I
/<..,~~ ~ ~ I
-,' ~~~V ~t I
~ / ~~ ~
I // ~ -, I
I· ~ ~'
/ J I -'
y ~
J'i
f I
: I
::: I
~t
o I
DR.
~ç
"-
"
120
60'
~<v
· ~'" .
~
·w
'", >
H
,..rv
. .-" ';~- L.I-
"0
'S 89·06'00u E. 278.28'
--
223.00'
!~
p
'":;)~
~~
f-
~""
~W
~~
,~
~û)
-p:::-
ee
A
I ~
I ~
I :-r
1&.1 1- 3"
:z co
~ I~ ð
~ IN ~
~I ~
~./ ~
I
I
LOT 3
ZONED - 1-2
46.'72.6272 SQ. FT.
U.0692 AC.)
(
:;:
a
z
(f)
lR
J'-: 1-2
;8.8131 SQ. FT.
, ACRES)
.,.
~
.
o
o
z
I I
I J.
I ~
1 ï
1 1101
li
S 89·06'OOu E
223.00'
1l..}
L..
:::>
Q:
I
I _ t
I g.
I
I
I
LOT 4
ZONED - 1-2
28.098.00 SQ. FT.
(0.64:5 AC.)
e·
-.,.
· .=::.-----_J L-----223.00.~!!.!.'.~s~""".._=_
· .. --1--
--
N 89°06'0011 W. 605.36'
~d;~_.~ ,:. :~.. -,.:.
,
.~~.~.. -. L
. ...
<~.....,;"'¡"-.:.,~:-,":' ..,.
. _.',,_ -.__.Ie
:......., ,. .
~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
¡
~
[ Department:
~SUbject:
¡
I
Planning and P~velopœe~~
Council Meeting Date: 9/23/85
Agenda Number: GN 85-91
ProposedEasement.Vac"tión Cloyce Lane
Resolution No. 85...23 North of Loop 820
~
~
I
1
¡
)
~
~
T
¡
I ~'
1
~
T
¡
!
J
I
!
i
!
I Finanoe Review
T Source of Funds: Acet. N\,Jl'J'lber
Bonds (GO/Rev.) $uffioieht Funds Available
Op~tratlng Budget
r
Depa otHeaøSigna1\,Jre<.. .... .,> ... ..... . .. C ty anager
LC1TY Or:JUNCl1.. ACTION;'TEM
Mr. Gene Huggins ower of Huggtns Hon<la has reqüéste4.tbatthe City of North Rj,chland
Hills release and abandon a tet\ (10) foot wate~ line.ea......ntrunning south from Short
Street along the frontag~of Cl~yce.Lane and turn1ng.~nt9¡tbecenter of the tract on the
east side of Cloyce whichc\1rrentl~ conta1nst~ea()nctacie~let'sÞip. The easement is
located such that the exist1\1s4ealerstiip.isnotaffectedby the easement. However, Mr.
Huggins is now proposing to de'Ve~oPJ'second 8'ftO. dealet,'sþ,ipo11the western half of his
tract. This will placetþe' pt'()poseclbuilding tn.conflictwith the existing easement.
As Mr. Huggins'engineerstatesi:t1'lþiSi;etter t~eea..Ø1entwas.originally dedicated as a
water line easement. . '.t1:1eitttendedusewas for:a"at~r11U11ntoserve a fire hy4rant.
The fire hydrant locationwasdetet'snined by the .site·. plan· ofa. propº_sed apartment
complex which was never·constructed.
The Staff has investigated the.requ~r.1I1ent of¢hew.tersystemand the proposed auto
dealership layout and have.4etet,'minedthat the!easement: iø no longer needed. Since the
easement was dedicated specific:al1yfor water $ainuse.no other utilities have been
located there.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recO'lDlJ1~nd~d ttla.tthe Ci~yCounc:tlapprove Resolution 85-23
abandoning the water main <easement on Jlock 42CR as desiCt'ibed in the attached documents.
. Finance Director
\'i";,>;4.~;~;':;:\;
" ,;::;;j;;Ä'~;;:',:j;'Ú;¡i<!'~~;f.'J.)
,::':;,::-;,,:¡':i
-;,{;:,!;::,,;:~::-':';>'
Page of
ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers
'--
Richard Royston
City of North Richland Hills
NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING
Ref: Vacate Water Easement
Dear Mr. Royston;
Mr. Gene Huggins owner of Block 42CR, Richland Terrace Addition,
Volume 388-174, Page 46, Tarrant County Plat Records request that
the existing waterline easement recorded in Volume 4640, Page
927, Tarrant County Deed Records which is on Block 42CR be
vacated. This easement was granted in 1968 by the previous
owner. At that time the property was zoned multi-family and this
easement would provide water for the project. Since that time
Mr. Huggins has purchased the property and rezoned it to C-l
commerical. During this rezoning and the construction of Huggins
Honda, an eight inch waterline was constructed along Cloyce
Street to the Loop 820 frontage road then east to Susan Lee
completely looping Block 42CR. This easement is not being used
and with the new line in place it is not needed.
Mr. Huggins plans to expand onto the western portion of Block
42CR and request that the easement be vacated. Please place this
request on the City Council agenda. Please find enclosed a copy
of the easement recorded in Volume 4640, Pg. 927 and a sketch of
the portion to be vacated.
If you need any additional information please call me.
Sincerely,
~~
encl: '·Vol. 4640, pg. 927
Sketch of vacated area
._~.
222 West Exchange Avenue · Fort Worth, Texas 76106 . 817.625.5504
'-
'/
-.
r
,1..-
',~ I
J
_I
I
l
, !'/
'
TI
l~
T
..
If
r
.": ..
. '.
.~~
. I·'
I .
"
-
. . ~. .. ... ;'.-. \'~~":.'-
. .I.
.
.'_.... ,.........-. '"""--
!
,
&
,
....... I
~....
,.....
, .
'. . .
':~. ,.
'-,
,f
~
. . ,~, .
".
'-""
'J .
. .
'-.
t'
"
, ,
~
, .
.,~.. "' ";""'_''''_''''__:._;,
.
I
, ,
'1
'"I ~
.'
.
.
,I4SEMEHI
eþ;~l
~t)' ~(()~ )
-C:Ost 'Û{Or' .
...... ·to \, .
,~
~ THE STATE Of TEXAS X
'X
COUNTY Of TARRANT X
THAT (') c.h::),..JOHN R. CnWQEN. .1R
c. JAr~ WIlSON. ~FnR~F P MACATE£.
III
'Oft ANO IN CONSIOt:RUION or TtiC SUM or ONt ($1.00) DOLLAft CAsH TO Mt IN H^NO '410
'Y T.....T C.U'TY "'T'. Su..,y C......TI..; """T ., W.". I. ""OW"..", ...
rUftTHCftCONSIOCR^TION or THC leNcrlTS TO Ie DeftlVeD IY HC ON ACCOUNT or THt
C.'IT .uey , .', .ce ... T'Uey I .', ... .AI .n...u IV T .....T C.Ù'TT. "AT" SU.~.. c......
. """ " " ,
. . .
T I.. ., ~ X-X «'XC( »UWKJ\X KII(, . W.." "", KK»»XK, I. ... T...u.. 'Y "'TAI. ..
. , . . . . " .' -....,' .
.;
",.,," "·""'TC' .C'C""', .. ""'Y .,VC ... ."'Y T. T'c ,.,. T.....T C.U"T
K'T'. SU"'T C·.....T,... . ,......T'.. .r T.....T C.U'T', Tc..., T., "..T T.
\
'.""u'" .ce.'IT.UCT ... "..nu.... 'AI 'TAI. J\ì( XU,1\:U; I\I\X,U x,¡,~X~ . WATU "Nt.
~X~~~ T..CT',. WIT. ." .C'C..... "TC..,. I', v... ... .,.... T"T C"T". '.T.
T'A'T .. ".T ., ,... 'C·""C. .. TH' "'T 'TT"HC' H"CY., WHI'H "'T 'H' .,.C.,..
T'.. ,. H··C · "'T 'C".r .. 'v"Y .. TH'V.H 'CT .VT 'C'C'H, T.c ""H"T .c.".
""Y,. "'H' · ''''T'V'YI.H C"""T .r,.urr"'CHT W"TH T. '."T'U'T TH' ......,.
»XK~jX~~~K W'TC. "'C 'Y '.'H., '."T'V'TI.. H'TH... ... . "'MAN"T
eASt'""NT
1 0 _ 'T. VIOt,
5 rT CACH SlOt or A CtNTCR LINt AS SHOWN ON THt
-
"AT ATTACHCD 'H. "."",. AI r.".Va: BEGINNING at a point in tbe Sovth
line of Maplewood Avenve, said point being Nag"15'M a dlstan,. of
413.0 fe.t from· the North...t corner of Blo'k B. fiichland Tor..,.
Addition to tho City of North Rlchllnd H111s,T,,"s,
THENCE So u th a dh ta'nclt of 1119.13 feet to & point:,
THENCE S86'00'E a distance of 125.0 feet to a point;
THENCE S61'00'E a d1::~4nc8 ~f 170.0 feet to a point.
...
TO HAVE AHO TO HOLD YH, "H' ""'TU."y T. r""'T C.UNTY H'T" $u..,y
C··...'T'.H 'N. IT. .UC,,·...O ... """" T."TH" WltN TH' "'"T ... "'VI""
'. I
'T "Y 'N. ." YIH,. T. 'HT,. "'0 "'HI"" .. 'HY "'T TH'.'.r, roo YH, .u....,
.r 'O"T.VCTI.O. ·"."T'V'YI'. ,.. ..,.T.'.I.....). .'u,. .. WAT,. '"'C, .. '.TH.
AN. r.. MAHI.. '·'HeCTI... T"NeWITN, .H" U... tHe C.H."".. YHAt T....HT C.U'TY
.HA'" $uP"y C··'.'ATI.H UI," 'T A" TIH", .ry,. '0'.. '.y W"K I. '.N'C'T'..
VIT~ TH, 'O"T'U'YI.', "'.'O"U'T'.H .. """ .. '.,. "W" O, "Y ,."..,
TH'.,or, "OT·.C ",. """" YO TH' C.H.'T'.H I. UH"H ".C U,., r.UH' .,...,
I
,¿
--
, '
. . ~. .
'". ".
. p. r:.·... . .:....:. ..~~ ..:: .
& . '.. .-¡ ...."~,:~;:...¡.......;
'. ...... ....1'. "'~" ',0 "eo
-1-
I
I.
I
V0l4640 ~92?
"¡¡¡-
~
--
'-<
- -.
",--.. í
I
.
-. '.
... -------
-..
.. '"", ;." ":::.,.:'.::; :;; ;. .'~ '"
. :--.-:,.:::., -.- ~-;...: ~''":"'; .-;.:-
.; . . ..":.:,. ... ~ '. .. ~. ..:....
, , .
~ . ... .. . . - .
.~..,...
.. _., '''''',J
.... ...
yo' . . J
.. .
'.
, .
'." ;"'-fI ~ ..'..... .,.,
..' . .. '~'.
I
vOl4640 PAc,928
., ..
SUCH WORK W~~ UHO&RTAKCN, AND THAT. IN T~C USE 0' SAID RIÇHTS AND PRIVI~EÇCS MERlIN
CRANTCD TARRANT COUNTY HATeR SUPP~Y CORPORATION WI~L NOT CRCATe ^ NUISANCC OR DO
ANY ACT THAT WI~L DC oeTRIMENTAL TO SAIO PRCMISES.
ijlTKESS OUT H^HDS, THIS
196 l'
THE STATE OF TEX^S X
COUNTY OF T^RR^NT X
..' BEFORE HE, THE UNOEr.SICNED AUTHORIT~ ~OrAñY PUBLIC ~ ANOrQR SAID. CO~~TY T I
. . -(.) -J. c,1. C .......A: '<I.t.4:__ .~r./,.,~,¿<,(,/
", ...···~'~9..·S,T..,TE, ON THIS DAY PERSONA~~Y APpeAR CO . .... ""'a..<-A.//./ " KNOWN TO MC TO BE .iZ!.. ¡
...<~;~~~Ht·~.~i~Q~ '..HOSE NAMe IS SUBSCRIBeD TO THE 'OReCOINC INSTRUMCNT, A"'D ACKNO\l~EDCèD TO ¡
. !.<i < H ~ T~At~F\ HE EXE M ED THE SAHE r D. T~t PD~P~~ C:/,~~ ,.~.~,~~:~,~'~ T :'~O TO ERE '0 EX PRCSs< D. !
. \!S \. . \: (. r&1M tiHOEK MY NAND AND SiAL OF OFFlêE, .;~ s·3I,"'.;;' Drð7:;z;7<.GV !
\? ....~196~..f.. . . <.J .. '.J! '. . I
.. ()::- ........ "<: ,,' .""~ Ó)~ 'I
'.' D ""..- __
\... :\_~,~......... ~ . NOTA'T rDOL Ie, .T A' "OT CDDon ì' TexAS ,
\HY COMMISSION eXPIRES;c::::::.. . 1~L.
'--
THE SThTE OF TEXAS X
COUNTY OF TMRMlT X
BEFORE ~IE, THE UNOERSIGNED AUTHORITY, A HOTARY PUB~IC IN AND F"OR SAIO Coulln'
AND STATE, ON THIS DAY PCRSONALLY APPCAReD ANO
, HIS WIF"t, BOTH KNOWN TO He TO Be THC P~RSONS
~HOSE HAMCS ARt SUBSCRIBED TO THC 'OREGOIHG INSTRUHeNT, ANO ACKNOWLCDceD TO MC TH~7
THEY EACH eXECUTED THE SAME 'OR THE PURPOSES AND CONSIDERATIO~ THEREIN EXPRESSED;
AHO THE SAID ,WIF't 0' THe SAID
HAVING BEeN EXAMINED BY HE PRIVILY ANO APART rROM HER HU$DAND, AND HAVING THE SAME
rUL~Y EXPLAINED TO HeR, SHE, THE SAID . ACKNOWLeOGEO
SUCH INSTRUIIEI:T TO Be HER ACT AND DEED, AND SHE DECLARED THAT SHE HAO WILLINGLY
SICNeD THE SAME F'OR THe PURPoses AND CONSIDeRATION THEREIN EXPREsseD} AND THAT
SHe 010 NOT VI~~ TO RETRACT ~T~
196
GIVEN UNDER MY HhND AND SE^L OF OFFICE"TH'~
DAY 0'
NOTARY PUB~lt, TARRANT COUNTY, TeXAS
My COkMISSION eXPIRes
'. t.S6
I
\
f'
I
:\
I
-2-
..,
'.
. :.:
II
"
I.',
.
,
~_..JI
"',
~
1
-.':.".".:'.:"
,,,.. ~~ "-'.
--
-
EWOOD
AVE-
-',
---~
. . . ~ . .' .
.: ~- :- -'. . .
. . ~.' .
I
I
-,-~
I
I
I
I
II
'I
, I
~ I~
~ I lU
I~
I~
~ I~
" II~
Q'I'
Q I~
~
~ I ~
~ I~.
LL I ~
'0 I~·
~ ~
ç:) . I I
¿j I I
1
I
I
I
I
I
J
-,
I'
I
..,.:'t..... .
.t
--
. I
" '. .
-'
, ..
.. ~ ..'
. ...' ,- >,0",.,. ':'~,,: '.... ',' ,'t,:
°1,. ':".
" .. ...,...
. ".
. ..- ....'
!-2~q:;i~::;!:;?ft~~~~;:,:"
-~..:t".:- ...~~"(_.~f1ì}~....'....~ .
~~:'~~~f!S~~ti~ j
13 t. OCJ.) 42
RICt./LLìN/J . 7Ë/(/(t:)CE-
,QODIT/ON
CITy O¡:- nORTI-I alC J,/t.'ìND
/I¡~.l. S I ~RS
SI-IO/::?T'
ST
r:
I I
I I
I
I
I
¡I
'kl_s 8(¡,.
/-- -.::: -...!?o' ~
,"'- ---
"':;.Ò7-.~"
I '"
)ol4640 rau929. \~~~,
. ,.., ......."... - 0.
j
I
/
I
I
/'
-
1/
. :J _.. .' ..~
:. ,".:'".:
'. I
.,~
"
-,:¡
...-
, .
¡
,!~ -
..:
. -
--
'. '
.
!
....- ---.----..-
I-
)
i77,' 7'j¡ -tf J/*
'!J /'1'
151 . J., MN-" '
r' ~acIWIIS II 'S""l 'AIUno::J IUI"'l'/O
3'd PI" llUnfO" '~I u, 030Ho:m,
"'1 podWflS '1Ur¡ '~I I' pu, ~'p
"-<4IU' 'I~I )lIU '<¡1¡Je~ Aql/II I
{' lnYijijYJ. ~ AlNno:;r
&\?GJ. 110 i.a'.Ls ..
: "0
'. "~
.. ...
.
~ . .
. -,.. .' ~.
.' .....:.
r
. 'i\ t~~<···~·
f ~ r; ~
R Q ~r '. t~ n
'\, ~ ~ œ ~
~ '\ <.0
\ ~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~"
'-~ "
:\
~.
"T'
",
"
- .
..,
.
~
.'
--,
:1~~#~~{}r}~~~;~~.~*[S~.~§~~!~~~i
. ~
, '
.. ~
'!'--
. '
.
. '
-:.
.-.;W"~:#Y"':)f! .
i. ;. ::~~:.; '~:!:jr: -;,~T~~'
" ,
:
"
,!~
'l\W L-
~l!bllX_~e§s~s~l=~açallº~
STATE OF TEXAS
CUUNTY U~ lARRANT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
lhat lhe City of North Richland Hll1s, Tarrant County, Texas does
vacate and abandon the portion of the easement recorded in Volume
4640, Page 92/, Tarrant County Deed Records in and along a
certain tract of land described as follows for purposes and
consideration herein expressed:
The following described tract or parcel of land situated in that
certain tract recorded as ~lock 42Ck, Richland lerrace Addition,
Volume 388-174, Page 46, Tarrant County Plat Records. And being a
portion of said easement recorded in Volume 4640, Page 927
T.C.C.R. being a ten (10) foot utility easement with center line
described as follows: '
B~GINNING at a point in the north property line of said Block
42CR, said property .line also being the south right-6f-way line of
Short street, said point being b.OO feet from the northwest
corner of Block 42CR;
lHENC~ North 00 degree 41 minutes 1~ seconds ~01.23 feetparallel
to and five (5) feet from the west line of said Block 42CR;
- ----
THENCE South 86 degrees 00 minutes East 125.00 feet to a point;
THENCE South 61 degrees 00 minutes East 170.00 feet to the end of
the easement and containing 4963 square feet.
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
E:·:ecuted in North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Te>:as, in
triplicate original on this the ___ day of ________________, 1985.
-----------------------------------
STATE OF TEXAS )
COUNTY OF l'ARRANT )
BEFORE me, ----___________________________________, on this day
personally appeared ______________________________________, known
to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing
instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same
for the purposes and ,cQnsideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the
---------------___________, 1985.
---,
day of
----------------------------------------
NOTARY PUBLIC, ___________ COUNTY, TEXAS
.........-~..'-.
~ ..¡1II.''-';'
~
.----~
I
-.
- èõ
..;
")
'"
.,
.
"t ~
~ -
~ ~
J.) .Q
IU "J
~
0
.J
V
7
L
r \
ExHIBIT
II I
A
5E.~ A.TrAG.HE.D FI~Lp Noïe:.~
--"---..-
. '~~O (T ~T~ee..T
S &1- ~Sl ~O· f:
....0.77'
I
I
I
1"'('
I~
Ii
11\1
I
I
I
I'
,_ ~(,. 00' 00· ¡;
--..-
.ø
~
U/
~
-
;.
\11
42-~
c.~ Wt/líloµ
~.s
" ::-...fo.,.
~ 0.,
';> .....::::-.. 0,,"
(:) " ::-...
'0, -....;: ~<!t'
" .
.....
~
...
..
't
~
30' MOtll ,. PIP E L-I.....
f!A!oI!.,..,.NT
III
... 100'
~,
....
1"1
.
...
.0
<-0
010
6'¿o
....
~'O
. tv.
~
~'LH LAhJ t?
AS
VOLU\4E
BL..a::.~ 42.-G~
íl::..~~Ac..t=..
t<.E:C..O~E-.þ
'2ðe,-174 '
,
T. C.T. F. ~.
..- ... .
At::>t/li I 0 ~
ItJ
r'Ac;, t::.. _. ,A~
I,
--
RESOLUTION NO. .85-23
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
A RESOLUTION ABANDONING AN EASEMENT SOUTH FROM
SHORT STREET ALONG FRONTAGE OF CLOYCE LANE AND
TURNING INTO THE CENTER OF THE TRACT ON THE
EAST SIDE OF CLOYCE CURRENTLY CONTAINING THE
HONDA DEALERSHIP AND DESCRIBED AS BLOCK 42CR,
RICHLAND TERRACE ADDITION.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, finds that it presently owns a ten foot utility
easement, previously dedicated for general utility use purposes, on
property described below; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the City of
North Richland Hills no longer needs, uses or anticipates a need or
use for such easement.
Now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of North Richland Hills that:
1.
The City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas
does vacate and abandon the portion of the easement recorded in
Volume 4640, Page 927, Tarrant County Deed Records in and along a
certain tract of land described as follows for purposes and
consideration herein expressed:
'-
The following described tract or parcel of land situated
in that certain tract recorded as Block 42CR, Richland Terrace
Addition, Volume 388-174, Page 46, ,Tarrant County Plat Records.
And being a portion of said easement recorded in Volume 4640, Page
927 Tarrant County Deed Records being a ten (10) foot utility
easement with center line described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the north property line of said Block 42CR,
said property line also being the south right-of-way line of Short
Street, said point being 5.00 feet from the northwest corner of
Block 42CR;
'-
THENCE North 00 degree 41 minutes 12 seconds 201.23 feet parallel,
to and five (5) feet from the west line of said Block 42CR;
THENCE South 86 degrees 00 minutes East 125.00 feet to a point;
THENCE South 61 degrees 00 minutes East 170.00 feet to the end of
the easement and containing 4963 square feet.
--i
~~-'+"'~''''~''''..:p¡,..'.'';'±:'' '._~....~."...:~:-. ~,.r'
1
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'" Department: Personnel
}-SUbject: ~~i.nance No. 1282 Adopting Section 207(K) of the
U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act
Council Meeting Date: 9/23/85
, GN 85-92
Agenda Number:
1
A U.S. Supreme Court decision on February 19, 1985 makes local governments subject
to the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is basically
a federal minimum wage and overtime act. To comply with the Act will require the
following changes in our current policies:
J
T
1. A change in our method of calculating overtime pay for firefighting
personnel.
T
2. Abolish the practice of awarding compensatory time in lieu of earned
overtime pay.
T
Although the Act states that overtime pay shall be paid to all covered employees at
one and one-half times their regular rate for hours worked in excess of (40) hours
per work week, Section 207(K) of the Act provides ~ities with the option of selecting
a different standard to compute earned overtime for Firefighters and/or Police
Officers. Section 207(K) requires that police officers be paid overtime for hours
worked in excess of (43) hours per week. Our current policy is to pay overtime to
police officers for hours worked in excess of (40) hours per week and it is suggested
that this policy remain in effect. However, Section 207(K) should be applied to
firefighting personnel. This section allows a city to adopt a work period of not
less than (7) days nor more than (28) days for firefighting personnel. For the
various work periods there is a different maximum work hours standard after which
overtime hours shall be earned. It has been determined that a (28) day work period
should be adopted for firefighting personnel. An ordinance to that end is attached.
T
T
r~
I
Under the Act, the work hours standard for a (28) day work period for firefighting
personnel is (212) hours which computes to a weekly average of (53) hours. Our
firefighters, working their regularly assigned shiftst work an average of (56)
hours per week. Thereforet the City has a built-in overtime liability of (3) hours
per week per firefighter. Since our firefighters are already being paid straight
time for (56) hours, the (3) hours 'of additional pay will beat a half-time rate.
T
T
I
On June 24 of this year, the U. S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued its enforcement
policy applicable to local governments. The DOL has established a compliance date
retroactively to April 1St 1985 with an enforcement date of October 15, 1985. This
was to allow cities adequate time to prepare compliance policies and to make the
necessary budget adjustments to fund the additional overtime expense associated
with the requirements of the Act.
r
Since comp time was no longer allowed as of April 1St 1985 some comp time had been
accumulated by Police and Fire personnel when the DOL policy was received in July.
These comp hours will need to be converted back to overtime hours and the employees
Finance Review
T
I
---L-
Acct. Number See Page 2
SUffi~dS Available
~~
City Manager
T
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
r. '. Operating Budget
I, ,Other
'--,~ ~
~~natur.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
'-
PaQe 1 of_~_
I
,
.....
paid accordingly. The impact of the "No Comp" Rule in all other departments is
mimimal since most of those employees are already being paid for their overtime
hours and have no comp time on the books.
',,--
COMPLIANCE COSTS:
1984-85 F.Y.: April 15 - September 30
Police Department:
Fire Department:
Total:
$18,000
45,000
$63,000
1985-86 F.Y.:
Police Department:
Fire Department:
Total:
$33,000
52,000
$85,000
The additional $85,000 in overtime expense for next year has been included in
the 1985-86 operating budget.
'--
For 1984-85, $54,000 will be needed by the departments to meet the $63,000
compliance cost. The police department can absorb $9,000 of its cost in their
current operating budget.
Sufficient funds are available in the following accounts of the current operating
budget to fund the additional $54,000.
FUNDING SOURCE:
ACCOUNT
AMOUNT
01-70-01-4800
01-70-01-1060
01-90-02-1010
01-90-02-6600
Total:
$ 13,000
12,000
23,000
6,000
$ 54,000
'--
There are currently two bills before Congress. Senator Don Nickles (R-OKLA)
is sponsoring a bill, S. 1570, which would exempt state and local governments
from the provisions of the FLSA. Representative John Porter (R-III) has
introduced an amendment to an appropriations bill that would prohibit the DOL
from using federal funds to enforce the FLSA on cities and states until after
March 31, 1986. If either of these, or any similar bills, are enacted prior
to the enforcement date of October 15, 1985 then our required compliance with
the FLSA will not exist or else be delayed if Porter's amendment is approved.
The Council is asked to approve the steps necessary to comply with the FLSA
in the event no congressional relief is forthcoming. However, if no congressional
action is taken in this regard then the City needs to be prepared to comply with
the FLSA.
"--
~
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Page 2 of 3
,-,--,,-<>...
~
L....
L Recommendation:
L
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve Ordinance No. 1282 adopting Section 207(K) of the U.S. Fair
Labor Standards Act.
2. Establish an escrow account with the $63.000 identified above for the
payment of the 1984-85 compliance ,cost. retroactive to April 15, 1985
in the event no congressional action is taken to relieve the City from
the FLSA requirements.
'--
'--
I.-
1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Page 3 of '\
\....._....-
ORDINANCE NO. 1282
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1.
The City has adopted, and by these presents, does adopt the
provisions of Section 207 (k) of the United States Fair Labor Standard Act for
all firefighting personnel in the City Fire Department.
2.
A twenty-eight day work period has been, and is hereby,
established for those personnel in the Fire Department who qualify as actual
fire fighting personnel, such twenty-eight day period to be effective as of
April 13, 1985 at 7:30 o'clock a.m.
3.
Those firefighting personnel falling within the purview of this
ordinance shall receive overtime pay at one and one-half times their normal
rate of pay for hours worked in excess of 212 during any twenty-eight day
work period.
"-
PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of September, 1985.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
L -Á
L
I
L
~
~
I
~
t
~~
L
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating :Budgèt
Other
CITY OF '
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS·
~ ,'- ,
¡!êo\.lnCII Meeting Oat,: 9/23/85
increase f~r 30 days.
. Finance Director
~
1
RESOLUTION NO. 85-25
'--
WHEREAS, on June 10, 1985, by Ordinance No. 1234, the City
Council suspended for 90 days the Schedule of Rates filed by Lone Star Gas
Company on May 29, 1985; and
WHEREAS, additional time is needed to study the rate package.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of North Richland Hills that:
1.
The Schedule of Rates filed on May 29, 1985 be and are hereby
suspended for an additional 30 days.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of September, 1985.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALTIY:
Attorney
~r
L
I
I
'--
I
I
'--
r
I
I
L
!
I
~
~
~
L
\-..
1
I
~
I
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.. Department:
MU'Qicip3l Court
Ordinance NO. U~3~ J,.t~t;~fin2 Ordinance
Council Meeting Dat~: 9/23/85
Agenda Numbelr: GN 85-94
Subject:
The current Ordinance(~o..46il)t'èøulating dumping of t~.ab.s.nd refuse in the City of
North Richland Hills~.va.~,n~u.~clear, and does.notçQV.,rdumping of vegetation. In
the past citizens ofNo;:rth.ltc.ã~s.n~Ø1.lls ha~e wantedtcrf1.1ecomplaints against people
who d.ump refuse on the.ir>.pro.·.pet'tY·Ød Qrdinance No. 461 ijasnot been completely
.. ',' .... ,', ..... ..... .. .. .... ... .... ,
effective.
The proposed ordinanefl~t't.~~~1.~a.r·.under.tandabl.el'.~ast!. that no citiz~n or firm
can dump refuse on pub~~cørpr1'V.t;eproperty within our.cit,>l1mits and increases the
penalty to $1,000.00. .
Recommendation: .. .
Approval of the attached Ørd1nanceNo. 1283 :l:srecOmmeJ,\ded.
: .. .. .... ',1
N/A
I
Finance R~v ew
Acct.Number N/4.
SOfflolent FundS Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other /,
,~~~?
, ",,", ' "', ",¥,,'-:
¿ Department Head Signature,. .
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
-------
/)
~'ffa{~
,.. .. ,".. \
City Manager
. Fi nance Direç'or
-'tL
"-> ,:.....:-.. '.'> : ',- .... ",:,",. .. .,.,' ,:: , '
.,'.....-.....................:..,.._..,. "', '_0.0.. ..
.',:~:·¡~:;¡;~'~i_~~~¡~4.::,,;,.,~,,-;i:+~~j};/,..:~....·,:-:}'...~~;:~~"
,::5~,,;.;;':),;~"::¡::':.;>~;: "
~:.., < '-i::" :,,: . :,:,_.':,;i_:': :"-~"
,-~ .,;,,-~'f:.;,:i'~).~:',)~:<;J\\'::? ::i;;: , '.;,' :',
1
Page 1 o:f
-:v-~;:r(\:ç;>,:':':",·.,;·;
r :::'¡o.:,:~~\.{,;;_:<,t^
<-;., "."'.,
ORDINANCE NO. 1283
"~
AN ORDINANCE MAKING IT UNLAWFUL TO DUMP OR DISTRIBUTE
TRASH OR REFUSE, INCLUDING VEGETATION UPON ANY PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS AND PROVIDING FOR A FINE NOT IN EXCESS OF $1,000.00
FOR VIOLATION OF THE ORDINANCE.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
ORDINANCE NO. 1283
',--,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1.
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to dump or
distribute any form of trash, refuse or garbage, including vegetation, upon
any public street, alley, thoroughfare, sidewalk, easement or any public
right-of-way within the city.
2.
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to dump
or distribute any form of trash, refuse, or garbage, including vegetation,
upon the property of another without written permission of the owner of such
property, which permission must have been given in advance.
3.
--
Any person, firm or corporation violating any portion of this
ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not in excess of
$1,000.00. .
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
',--
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Parks and Recreation Department
Council Meeting Date: 9/23/85
í Subject:
Acceptance of State Gr.ant for Beautification Projects Agenda Number: GN 85-95
The Parks Department has been in contact with Mark Matthews, Landscape Architect for the
State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, since February, 1985, concerning
the availability of matching funds ,for highway beautification projects.
-
On September 17, 1985, we contacted Mr. Matthews for an update. He informed us that
everything is in place and that we should write Mr. Davis a letter stating just how mu~h
money we are prepared to commit.
There are two projects that we have in mind. One is the island located at the northeast
quadrant of Loop 820 (north frontage road) and Holiday Lane.
This project is the most expensive and requires a sprinkler system, mounding and
extensive planting of post oaks, crepe myrtles and purple honeysuckle.
The estimate cost of this project is $18,000 to $19,000. A breakdown is as follows:
-
Irrigation System
Plant Material
Top soil and stabilizer
Sod and ornamental rock
(Approximately 10,000
Labor
$ 5,000
4,500
3,500
1,800
sq. ft.)
4,000
$18,800
The State grant will provide 50% of this cost, or $9,400.
l
The second project will be the strip of land across Holiday Lane west of the above
described project, bordered by the north frontage road. This area is 528 feet long by
20 feet wide. No irrigation is needed in this area, due to the fact that the plants are
suitable for arid areas (lantana, etc..). 'The cost of this project will be approximately
$4,000, 50% of which will be funded by the State. The plans are not available because
they are under review by the State Highway Department.
l
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Staff be authorized to accept State grants totalling
approximately $11,400, and that $11,400 in City funds be committed for these projects.
These funds were allotted in the 1984-85 Budget.
l
1
1
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number 01-70-01-4800
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
1... _.~~ ~.~ _.,:t X
. -~ .~7j;:¡--
~r Department Head """SIgnature · City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
L-
Page 1 of
1
r-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
. Oepartment: Personnel
["'-sUbject: Ordinance No. 1274 Adopting TMRS Buy-Back Provision of
Forfeited Prior Service.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
"'--
r
r
r
r
r
I
Council Meeting Date: 9/23/85
Agenda Number: GN 85-96
The Texas Municipal Retirement System Act provides that a City may adopt an
ordinance to allow current employees the option of buying-back forfeited prior
TMRS service. TMRS members forfeit their service time in the system when they
withdraw their deposits upon termination of their employment. The City currently
has eighteen employees who have such forfeited prior service. A study was
conducted by TMRS to determine the additional cost to the City to provide this
option. TMRS has advised that the City's contribution rate would increase by
one-tenth of one percent (.10%) of gross payroll which represents an additional
cost of about $6000 for 1985/86. This increase in the City's cost can be absorbed
without any budget adjustment to the 1985/86 operating budget. With the adoption
of the ordinance, an employee may buy-back his/her forfeited service at any time
after having completed (24) months of consecutive service with the City. Twelve
of the eighteen employees with forfeited service would be eligible upon the adoption
of the ordinance.
Reconunendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1274
adopting the buy-back provision of the Texas Municipal Retirement System
Act.
r
Source of Funds:
i Bonds (GO/Rev.)
f\ Operating Budget --1L-
. '--' Other _
r I~t H~~ignature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Review
, 'inance Director
Departmentalized in account 1160
Available
Page 1 of
1
,~
ORDINANCE NO. 1274
AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY
WHO HAVE TERMINATED PREVIOUS MEMBERSHIPS IN TEXAS
MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, TO DEPOSIT THE SUMS SO
WITHDRAWN, PLUS ANNUAL WITHDRAWAL CHARGES, AND
ALLOWING AND UNDERTAKING THE COST OF ALLOWING ANY
SUCH EMPLOYEE CREDIT IN SUCH SYSTEM FOR ALL SERVICE TO
WHICH SUCH EMPLOYEE HAD BEEN ENTITLED AT DATE OF SUCH
WITHDRAWAL, WITH LIKE EFFECT AS IF ALL SUCH SERVICE HAD
BEEN PERFORMED AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THIS CITY.
WHEREAS, the actuary of the Texas Municipal Retirement System has
determined that all obligations charged against the City's account in the
municipality accumulation fund, including the obligations arising as a result of
this ordinance, can be funded by the City within its maximum contribution
rate and within its amortization period; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this
ordinance is in the best interests of the City; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 63.003 of Subtitle G of Title 110B,
Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, as amended, the City of North
Richland Hills hereby elects to allow any member of Texas Municipal Retirement
System who is an employee of this City on the day of
, 1985, who has terminated a previous membership in said
System by withdrawal of deposits while absent from service, but who has at
least 24 months of credited service as an employee of this City since resuming
membership to deposit with the System in a lump sum the amount withdrawn,
plus a withdrawal charge of five per cent (5%) of such amount for each year
from date of such withdrawal to date of redeposit, and thereupon such
member shall be allowed credit for all service to which the member has been
entitled at date of termination of the earlier membership, with like effect as if
all such service had been rendered as a employee of this City, whether so
rendered or not. The City of North Richland Hills agrees to underwrite and
hereby assumes the obligations arising out of the granting of all such credits,
and agrees that all such obligations and reserves required to provide such
credits shall be charged to this City's account in the municipality
accumulation fund. The five per cent (5%) per annum withdrawal charge paid
by the member shall be deposited to the credit of the City's account in said
municipality accumulation fund; and the deposits of the amount previously
withdrawn by the member shall be credited to his or her individual account in
the employee~ saving fund of the System.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective on the day of
, 1985, which is a date on or after the date set forth
in Section 1, above.
Ordinance No. 1274
Page 2
0'--.-
PASSED AND APPROVED this the
1985.
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
day of
MAYOR
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~~
L
I
~
1
~L
L
..........
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Purchasing
CouncH Meeting Date; 9/23/85
Subject:
Ratification~f Jbt'P!ft4iture of $7 ,318.00 to Agenda Number: PU 85-27
Ferguson PuaJ> 8tld.Supply to Repair One 150H;pi.. P't.Qàp
On August 2, 1985, purçÞ....in.....sadV!lsed by A1len.~r(J~sta.~,tbat the 150 H.P. pump at
the College Well Stati()nh~di~1J:rned\1P. I in turn~ø.~il:led.Mr.»ennis Horvath, who in
Mr. Line's absence"de~~~red"~rgency in accord.anc~~th<our .procùrement System and
in accordance with St..t~Lf.W:i'~J~2t'~ection 2 I1Exe1Jl.J>~e<1~roc1Jremetlt", Subsection 3,
"Emergency Procurement..adenecesl:la.ry by unforeseen damagetoiPublic property,
machinery, or equipment .f'
The emergency rep8iro~<~bewellpuap was handledbyFer~~s~P'-p and Supply who
all necessary equiij1Jl.ent>andt(Jp.~sto facilitate thefas.test~\J.rn. around time and
uninterrupted water service for; the citizens of North :&.ichlandHills.
The total cost for pick~p,<t().taloverhaul and deliverý_as$7,318.00
had
Reconnnendation:
Ratify the cost of repåtr 1D.the amount of $7,318. OOasout,l:1.hedabove for. one 150 H.P.
pump. l
Finance Review
\
/
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Bud et
Other
Acct. Number 02-11-01-3110
Funds Available
. Finance Director
1 bf
1
·-
\
'--
--
'--
ORIGINAL
--e
FERGUSON PUMP & SUPPLY COMPANY
Phone (817) 767,4371
P,O. Box 2219
MANUFACTURERS AND AGENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. DOMESTIC AND INDUSTRIAL PUMPING UNITS. WATER TREATEMENT EQUIPMENT
Office 1515 Eastside Drive
WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS 76307
SOLD
TO
CITY OF NO. RICHLAND HILLS
P. O. BOX 18609
NO. RICHLAND HILLS, TX. 76118
SHIP
TO
o
~
2 . 00/1 0 DA Y S
59!
SALES TAX
EXEMPTION
nu FARM 0 RESALE
uSE
1
1
S"~::EO þ~~T~D I ITEM NUMBER I DESCRIPTION I UNIT PRICE DISC I EXTENDED'
7,318.
Repair on 150HP VII Motor
SUB TOTAl.
SALES TAX
lABOR
7,318.00
THIS INVOICE IS PAYABLE AT WICHITA FALLS, WICHITA COUNTY. TEXAS
.ALL GOODS INVOICED AT PRICES IN EFFECT ON DATE OF SHIPMENT...
.THERE WILL BE A RESTOCKING CHARGf OF 25% ON ALL RETURNED MERCHANDISE'"
.1 V.a¡. PERCENT INTEREST PER MONTH ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS'"
.ITEMS "BACK ORDERED'· WILL BE SHIPPED AND CHARGED LATER...
.ANY VARIATION IN INVOICE MUST BE REPORTED WITHIN 10 DAYS FOR CORRECTION'"
7,318·tO
I
7,318.
. ANY MERCHANDISE RETURNED MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED WITH THIS INVOICE WITHIN
~ DAYS OF PURCHASE DATE...
WE AT
FERGUSON PUMP
& SUPPLY APPRECIATE
YOUR BUSINESS
~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~-..
Finance
D~partment:
Resolution NO,<ªr..24, Authorizing Contract
f or LeaseIPure'hase.':a<t1J.1p..n~
9/23/85
Council Meeting Date:
I Subject: Agenda Number: PU85-28
U~ 'rI1- City Council bashêt'~~~~""é:.~<o;I ths award of the1í~~J~:rirst Union Leasing
II ~:~i;~::~~n ~~gr~~:;:c~~.t.~.%~:c~r~:r~:e~e:~:l~~~:(~«i:~:';:~:/~~: ::~i;~nt
L; transàction. The purpose.....o.f th.....~~>~esolution is to authorize the execution of the
I lease/purchase agreement and related documents.
I
l
¡
~
I
1
i
I
ì
~
1
I
I
1'--'
r
,
i
~
I
~ ::::::::::<1on
~
!
1
~
~~
L
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Sonds (GO/Rev.)
operatl:z!ngSUdet
Other _
.. . '71k'
-,/ .~/
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
----.....
Aoct. Number. N/A
S~fic&ndS Available
~7;¡
City Manager
oJ
. Finance Director
;.:;-:~~~Ú"!";"::'i^~"'>'
~~~~i~Äi~:'/',,',~,;c~,:';\:":<~'-';'
';~:~>.f:#;! :::~- "
"' ;.~, ;\*:,~~~j;Jt~,¡f,~'~b~:1:~~:;f·:-:F
'i',':·_'
:;~:,<::-};;?<ê:"':-(i{'~:'" -',
RESOLUTION NO. 85-24
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore accepted
the bid of First Union Commercial Corporation for the
financing of a lease/purchase of Fire Department equipment
to be delivered on or about September 1, 1986; and
WHEREAS, the funds to pay for such equipment have
herefore been appropriated
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
The Mayor be, and is hereby, authorized to execute
the attached lease/purchase agreement as the act and deed of
the City.
1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of September,
~
Dan Echols - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanett Rewis - City Secretary
1
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Personnel Council Meeting Date: 9/23/85
1LsUbject: Renewal of City's Law Enforcement Liability Insurance Agenda Number: PU 85-29
1
T
Our current Law Enforcement Liability Insurance policy expires on 10/1/85. We
submitted this coverage for bids and received one bid from City Insurance Company.
Their bid was for a premium of $27,550 which is not considered to be. out of line
in light of the current trend in the insurance industry regarding municipal liability.
This past year, our premium was $8,000 for the same liability coverage. City Insurance
Company has an industry rating of A+XV which is a top rating that indicates the
company is financially sound and provides excellent service to its policy holders.
T
Recommendation:
T
It is recommended that the City Council award the City's Law Enforcement Liability
Insurance to City Insurance Company for FY 1985-86 at a premium of $27,550.
T
T
r
I
r-
I
r
r
,
r
!
)
r
r Source of Funds:
ì Bonds (GO/Rev.) _
r ... gf:;~ting Budget -L
~ ~ ~lgnatuŒ
, CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Review
, Finance Director
--
Page 1 of 1
)
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
! Department: Personnel
l~subject: Renewal of City's Auto Liability Insurance
Council Meeting Date: 9/23/85
Agenda Number: PU 85-30
1
ì
I
The City's Auto Liability Insurance expires 10/1/85 and was submitted for bids.
One bid was received, that from U.S. Fire Insurance Company. While the bid of
$29,556 by U.S. Fire is less than anticipated, their bid has excluded eight
employees as insured drivers based on the employees driving records in comparison
to the acceptable criteria established by U.S. Fire. In the past, these employees
would not have been excluded based on their current records. Because of the
attitude of insurance companies regarding any type of municipal liability, the
companies have re-defined an "acceptable" driving record and have applied these
new standards in determining the insurability of our employees. We believe the
criteria used is too strict and unfair to our affected employees and that these
employees should not be penalized because they are unjustifiably excluded as
insured drivers. Of necessity, the City will be a self-insurer for the eight
employees excluded in U.S. Fire's bid. We will be studying the feasibility of
the City self-insuring its Auto Liability for all employees with regard to funding
requirements, claims adjustment and plan administration.
T
T
T
T
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
T
1. To award the City's Auto Liability Insurance to. U.S. Fire Insurance
Company for FY 1985-86 for a premium of $29,556.
2. To approve the City as a self-insurer for those employees excluded
by U.S. Fire's bid.
T'-
I
r
r
r
I
r Source of Funds:
. Bonds (GO/Rev.)
I . Operating Budget ~
I ~ Other hAd -
~~
I Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Review
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I.-
Department:
Finance
Council Meeting Date:' 9/23/85
L.
Subject:
Award of Bids for Animal Control and Service Center
Agenda Number: PW85-19
l- The City Council on January 14, 1985 authorized the allocation of funds for the partial
construction of the Municipal Complex to consist of the following projects:
~
UTILITY
CIP
GENERAL
CIP
TOTAL
Service Center
$465,365
$344,216
$ 809,581
Animal Control &
Vehicle Impoundment Area
310,645
310,645
Total Allocated
$1,120,226
~
Formal bids were accepted from six construction companies on September 17, 1985. The bids
received are very competitive based on the number received and the relative closeness of
the lower bids. The tabulation is listed as follows:
ANIMAL CONTROL/ SERVICE
BIDDER IMPOUNDMENT AREA CENTER TOTAL
Cope Construction $419,800 $ 973,100 $1,392,900
Pete Durant 474,400 962,400 1,436,800
Ed S. Wilson 422,500 1,055,000 1,477,500
Walker Construction 484,500 1,018,000 1,502,500
~. G. C. I. 583,800 992,300 1,576,100
The De Moss Company 502,982 1,174,218 1,677,200
The low bidder is Cope Construction in the amount of $1,392,900. Mr. Fred Johnson, an
associate of Albert S. Komatsu, has reviewed the low bidder specification and has
recommended approval of that bid.
I
I
l
l
RECOMMENDATION
Although the total amount budgéted is $272,674 less than the lowest bid, we have a budget
savings of $144,573 for the site improvements bid that is proposed to be awarded to Austin
Road. The net balance needed from Unspecified CIP Funds is $128,101. It is recommended
that:
l
ì
1. The construction contract be awarded to Cope Construction in the
amount of $1,392,900.
1
1
I
Finance Review
1
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
operatJJ;:: fEþø¿
Other
......
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number See Above
nds Available
, Finance Director
/)-1
City Manager
'-
Page 1 øf
L
2.
L.
L 3.
\-
'-
'--~
L
~
'-
.....
.....
~
Funds be reallocated from the sîte improvements account in the amount of
$144,573 to the facility construction account.
Funds from Unspecified CIP Fund in the amount of $128,101 be
allocated to the facility construction account.
.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
i CITY OF
~ID.partm.nt: Public Works NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Subject: Bids for Street and Drainage Improvements- Municipal
Complex Site
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PW 85-20
9-23-85
i....
Bids have been taken for the improvement of the Public Works Service Center
and Animal Control site. These bids include both on-site and off-site
improvements. The bids include the internal roadway system, water and sewer,
and storm drainage.
An alternate bid was taken for concrete streets in lieu of asphalt streets.
The difference between the low bid for asphalt streets and concrete streets
is approximately $l3,OOO. The low bidder for asphalt streets was APAC-Texas
but their bid could be questionable since they did not bid a completion time.
Although it was not a requirement, APAC-Texas did not bid the concrete streets.
--
Since the traffic in and out of the service center will be heavier type
truck traffic, the concrete streets would be a definite asset to this
complex.
Recommendation: The staff recommends to approve the bid of Austin Road
Company in the amount of $557,180.72 for proposal B which includes the
concrete streets.
,
"-
Sufficient funds were allocated for those improvements and the award
of the bid should be distributed as follows:
09-60-00-6700 (water)
09-60-00-6750 (ßewer)
13-90-0l-6150 (S&D)
Total
$ 49,322.56
$ gz,187.64
$415,670.52
$557,180.72
i
l
¡
~
I
l
-
Finance Review
Acct. Number
5~ICI~7Ji~
a~ -
Ignature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
l
~
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating udget
Other
1
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
·
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
& E,J&
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
"---
September 13, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-335, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE IMPROVEMENTS
BID TABULATION
In accordance with your instructions, bids were received on September 11,
1985, for the referenced project. This project includes paving, drainage, and
utility improvements on the Municipal Complex site as. required to serve the
proposed Public Works Facility and Animal Control Shelter. The individual bid
tabulations are attached for your review. As the tabulation indicates, bids
were received from five (5) contractors.
The low bid was received from APAC-TEXAS, INC., P.O. Box 1807 Fort Worth,
Texas, 76101, (817/336-0521 E.E. Alford), in the amount of $544,388.13 for
Proposal "A" (Asphalt Streets). APAC did not submit a bid for concrete
streets. Also, APAC neglected to bid a contract completion time, therefore,
if you choose to award the contract to APAC then a contract completion time
will have to be negotiated.
The second low bid submitted was from AUSTIN RŒAD COMPANY, P.O. Box 2285, Ft.
Worth, Texas 76113, (817/336-237J Dwight Smith) in the amount of $551,820.65
for Proposal "A" (Asphalt Streets), and $557,180.72 for Proposal "B" (Concrete
Streets) for a period of 240 calendar days. The engineer's estimate was
$700,000.
We would note that the time bid is for all work excluding the railroad
drainage channel. After a permit has been obtained from the St. Louis
Southwestern Railway Company, then a change order must be issued for the
additional time required to complete the channel work. If a permit has not
been obtained within one (1) year from the work order date then the Contractor
can negotiate for extra compensation for the channel work. However, the City
also has the right to delete any and all of the channel work from the contract
if desired at that time.
A request for permission to construct the offsite channel improvements on the
railroad right-of-way was transmitted to the Railway Company on July 11, 1985,
along with easement documents. We telephoned D.R. Andrews, Area Engineer,
with the Railroad Company today to check on the status of the permit. He
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
---., -"..,
-.
Municipal Complex Site Improvements. continued
September 13, 1985
'-'
indicated that this agreement would probably have to wait until other pending
agreements with North Richland Hills were resolved such as the Rufe Snow
Crossing, the Holiday Lane Crossing, the Main Street Crossing, etc. Also, he
indicated that some fee for use of the railroad right-of-way for Dff-site
drainage may be required. In addition, he has worked with both APAC and
AUSTIN ROAD and has no problem with permitting either of these contractors to
do the drainage work on their right-of-way, if the permit is approved.
Both APAC and AUSTIN ROAD have worked in this City and throughout the area for
many years. We do not know of any engineering reasons which would preclude
award to either of these contractors. If you prefer asphalt streets then
APAC's bid' of $544,388.13 is $7,432.52 lower than AUSTIN ROAD's bid of
$551,820.65. If, however, you prefer concrete streets, then AUSTIN ROAD's bid
of $557,180.72 is the lowest -- $45,568.05 lower than the next lowest of
$602,748.77 by M&D CONSTRUCTION CO~
Based on operation and maintenace considerations along with experience with
both of these Contractors, we would defer recommendation of contract award to
the Public Works Department.
We will be available at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you
may have concerning this project. Meanwhile, please do not hesitate to call.
~
RW A / r a
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, A~sistant 'City'Manager
/Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
APAC-TEXAS, INC., E.E. Alford
AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY, Dwight Smith
~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Utility
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PAY 85-49
9-23-85
Subject: Watauga Trunk Sewer L:l.ne Pbas~ .11 Contractor's Påy
J:<.;sJ.mate NO. .3
At this time, this job $s<P1ióbably about 95% compJ..ete and within the next
month will be lOO%complete.
Recommendation: The.~ta.~frecommends toapprov~the payment to P & R
Construction Compan.y in the amount of $68,191.80.
I ,
~
ì
I
~.
~
j
f
,
l-
f
¡
~
~
f
~
t
~
1:
~-
L
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Rev
,Finance Director
-----...
~<~
epartment Head ¡;~ ""> ,I!t
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
...
~
City Manager
,., '.' .........
".........,_",'O.~.,'
Page 10f
I
..
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
'--
September 12, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-421, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BIG FOSSIL CREEK SANITARY SEWER
WATAUGA TRUNK LINE - PHASE 2
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.3
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.3, dated
September 12, 1985, made payable to P & R Construction Co. Inc., in the amount
of $68,191.80, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of August 31, 1985.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your
representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the original
submittal, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. Please note
~- that 69 linear feet of 18-inch diameter pipe at 16-18 foot depth has been paid
for in Bid Item No. 19. We will negotiate a change order to include this pipe
depth and reconcile quantities before final payment.
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $68,191.80, be made to P & R
Construction Co. Inc., 2040 Loop 336, Suite 125, Conroe, Texas 77304.
Along with a copy of this letter, the C~ntractor is being furnished a blank
estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may
have concerning this project.
DQ~
DHC/lld
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager /
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Scott Jenogan, Utilities Inspector
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
P & R Construction Inc.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367