The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1985-10-14 Agendas ~ _/ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 14, 1985 - 6:30P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambørs, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. '"\ NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. PW 85-23 Engineering Services and Schedule for Street and Drainage ...·Capital Improvement Pro.1ects(.t\genda Item No. 48) 2. PU 85-42 Authoritation.før Agreement for Telecommunications Consulting (Agenda Item.No. 46) ~ ì ! 3. PW 85-22 Transfer of Ownership of Part of Big Fossil Outfall Sewer Line and Construction of Metering Station (Agenda Item No. 47) '- 'L- 4. GN 85-101 Propos.edBeautification Projects (Ag.ri~altem No. 33) '- 5. PW 85-27 Architectural Services for Library/Recreation Facility Remodeling and Police Facilities Construction (Agenda Item No. 52) "-- - "- 6. PW 85-28 Proposed Contract for Library Consultant Services (Agenda It. .No. 53) :.- Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. Future Land U.se· Map from the Comprehenaive Master Plan 8. *Executive Session to Discuss Land, Personnel, and/or Litigation 9. Other Items *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law ì I I i- I '- :. - '-" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 14, 1985 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting September 23, 1985 5. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by Asterisk (10, 15, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, & 57) 8. GN 85-98 Resolution No. 85-27, Special Presentation By Fire Department to Mr. Rodriguez 9. GN 85-102 Presentation of Certificate of Conformance - Clyde Womack of Peat, Marwick & Mitchell CO *10. PZ 85-102 Ordinance No. 1284, Consideration of an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding warehousing Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 11. PZ 85-103 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Erin's Foods to rezone Lot 6, Block 1, Jack M. Estes Subdivision from C-l (Commercial) to C-I-Specific Use Sale of Beer for Off Premise Consumption (Located at 3900 Rufe Snow Drive) 12. Ordinance No. 1285 13. PZ 85-104 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of B & C Oil Company to rezone Lot A2, Parchman Addition, from C-l (Commercial) to C-l Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off Premise Consumption (Located at 6955 Grapevine Highway) 14. Ordinance No. 1286 - *15. PZ 85-105 Ordinance No. 1287, Consideration of an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 1080 Regarding the Keeping of Livestock 16. PZ 85-106 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of World Class Motors, Ltd. to rezone Lot 5, Kips Big Boy Addition, from C-l (Commercial) to C-1 Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos (Located at 7755 Northeast Loop 820) 17. Ordinance No. 1288 Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 18. PZ 85-107 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Winn-Dixie Texas, Inc. to rezone part of Lots 16A, Block 5, North Richland Hills Addition, from LR (Local Retail) to LR Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off Premise Consumption (Located at 7201 Grapevine Highway) 19. Ordinance No. 1289 20. PZ 85-109 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Bogies Restaurant to rezone part of Lot lR, Block 1, Walkers Branch Addition, from C-l (Commercial) to C-1 Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages (Located at 8407 Grapevine Highway) 21. Ordinance No. 1290 22. PZ 85-112 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from R-6-T (Townhouses and Garden Homes) to C-l (Commercial) (Located on the north side of Chapman Drive, approximately 415 feet east of Rufe Snow) 23. Ordinance No. 1291 Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 24. PZ 85-113 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from R-6-T (Townhouses and Garden Homes) to C-l (Commercial) (Located on the north side of Chapman Drive, approximately 385 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive) 25. Ordinance No. 1292 *26. PS 85-58 Request of Johnston & Son Construction Inc. for Replat of Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition (Located along the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive at the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive) *27. PS 85-61 Request of J-Mc Oil Company for Final Plat of Lot 6, Block 9, Richland Heights Addition (Commercial tract located on the northeast corner of Glenview Drive and Booth Calloway Road) *28. PS 85-63 Request of Hanson Properties for Replat of Lots 12-21, Block I, Nob Hill Addition (Located on the west side of Precinct Line Road north of the existing Nob Hill Subdivision) Page 5 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *29. PS 85-65 Request of Heritage Development Company for Final Plat of Spring Meadows Addition (Located on the west side of Smithfield Road north of Chapman Road into Hewitt Street) *30. GN 85-97 Texas Water Plan, Resolution No. 85-26 *31. GN 85-99 Nomination for Membership on Tax Appraisal District - Resolution No. 85-27 *32. GN 85-100 Regulation of Alcoholic Beverage Sales, Ordinance No. 1293 *33. GN 85-101 Proposed Beautification Projects 34. GN 85-103 Appointments to Boards/Commissions 35. GN 85-104 Supporting Interim Improvements to IH 820/Airport Freeway Interchange, Resolution No. 85-28 *36. PU 85-32 Heavy Duty Truck with Tool Box Body (1 each) - Bid Award to Jack Williams Chevrolet *37. PU 85-33 Janitorial Services _ Award Contract to Jani-King *38. PU 85-34 Tandum Dump Truck (1 each) - Award Bid to Frontier GMC, Inc. Page 6 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *39. PU 85-35 Dump Trucks (3 each) - Bid Award to Jack Williams Chevrolet *40. PU 85-36 Office Supplies - Award Contract to E.L. White *41. PU 85-37 Blazer/Ram Charger Vehicle _ Bid Award to North Loop Dodge *42. PU 85-38 Full Size Marked Police Units (7 each) - Bid Award to Jack Williams Chevrolet *43. PU 85-39 One Full Size Vehicle - Bid Award to Jack Williams Chevrolet *44. PU 85-40 S-10 Type Pick Ups (6 each) _ Bid Award to Frontier GMC, Inc. *45. PU 85-41 Full Size Pick Up Trucks (9 each) - Bid Award to Jack Williams Chevrolet *46. PU 85-42 Authorization for Agreement for Telecommunications Consulting *47. PW 85-22 Transfer of Ownership of Part of Big Fossil Outfall Sewer Line and Construction of Metering Station *48. PW 85-23 Engineering Services and Schedule for Street and Drainage - Capital Improvement Projects Page 7 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN " *49. PW 85-24 Watauga Trunk Sewer - Phase II, Change Order III '- *50. PW 85-25 Watauga Trunk Sewer - Phase II, Change Order 112 ... *51. PW 85-26 Chapman Drive Paving & Drainage Improvements - Change Order #1 - *52. PW 85-27 Architectural Services for Library/Recreation Facility Remodeling and Police Facilities Construction - *53. PW 85-28 Proposed Contract for Library Consulting Services '-" '- *54. PW 85-29 Cardinal Lane Water Extension Bid Tabulation "'-' *55. PAY 85-50 Watauga Trunk Line Phase 2 _ Partial Pay Estiamte #4 *56. PAY 85-51 Hewitt Street Paving & Drainage Improvements - Partial Pay Estimate 113 ,..- .......- *57. PAY 85-52 Harwood Road Street & Drainage Improvements - Partial Pay Estimate 116 ...- -,'" .......,,~,~~,...-._-~ ~._~~::~~.~~.----.._------ /" Page 8 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 58. Citizen Presentation Mr. Keith Dodd Re: Police Department Gwen Bain Re: School Crossing at Grapevine Hwy. and Harwood 59. Adjournment City of J\9rth Richland Hills, Texas .'- wL ~~- MEMORANDUM October 9, 1985 TO: City Council FROM: Richard Royston Director of Planning and Development ø__, SUBJECT: Proposed Land Use Map - ---- As requested at the last Council meeting we have had the Future Land Use Map reproduced in color in order to provide you with a picture of what is being proposed. Please make any comments or revision you feel appropriate. We will discuss your revisions at the Pre-Council Meeting October 14, 1985. - (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 --,·,_..._._~.c ~ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. - 1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order September 23, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dan Echols Marie Hinkle Jim Kenna Virginia Moody Jim Ramsey Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Lee Maness Gene Riddle Richard Royston Richard Albin Marjorie Nash Press: David Ray Mark England Chris Williams Absent: Richard Davis Dick Fisher Harold Newman Mayor Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Finance Director Public Works Director Director of Planning City Engineer Planning & Zoning Member Northeast Chronicle Mid Cities Fort Worth Star Telegram Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman 3. Councilwoman Moody gave the invocation. 4. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of September 9, 1985. Motion carried 3-0; Councilwoman Moody abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve the minutes of the special meeting September 12, 1985. Motion carried 3-0; Councilwoman Moody abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 6. Councilman Kenna removed Items No. 8 and 12 from the Consent Agenda. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 9, 1985 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1985 APPROVED REMOVAL OF ITEM (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA ~ 7. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 4-0. 8. Mr. Line recommended that this item be postponed until the Staff could provide additional information. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to postpone PZ 85-56. Motion carried 4-0. 9. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the request for an Appeal Hearing to be heard October 28, 1985. Motion carried 4-0. 10. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to authorize condemnation proceedings and the cost to be borne by Hamm and Associates. Motion carried 4-0. *11. 12. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to postpone PS 85-58. Motion carried 4-0. September 23, 1985 Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, & 28) APPROVED PZ 85-56 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN POSTPONED PZ 85-100 REQUEST OF R.G.A. DEVELOPMENT CORP. FOR AN APPEAL HEARING PS 85-35 REQUEST OF ALAN W. HAMM, INC. FOR FINAL PLAT OF BRIARWOOD ESTATES, SECTION 6 (LOCATED SOUTH OF STARNES ROAD AND EAST OF DOUGLAS LANE) PS 85-55 REQUEST OF JOHN BARFIELD, HERMAN SMITH, AND THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOR REPLAT OF TRACTS AR AND B, BLOCK 2, CRESTWOOD ESTATES (LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAVIS BLVD. AND STARNES ROAD) APPROVED PS 85-58 REQUEST OF JOHNSTON AND SON CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR REPLAT OF BLOCK 6, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MEADOW LAKES DRIVE AT THE INTERSECTION OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) POSTPONED -- 13. Mr. Jim Callicott, Sales Representative, Tony Roma's, appeared before the Council. *15. *16. *17. Mr. Callicott stated that they would like to erect a second sign on the property. Mr. Callicott stated the sign would be at the restaurant entrance and would be 48 square feet and 15 feet tall. Mr. Callicott stated he did not feel the restaurant was properly identified. Mayor Echols stated that if the interchange for this location was approved, there was a possibility the City would need more right-of-way. Mr. Callicott stated there would be no problem with moving the sign at the owner's expense if more right-of-way was needed. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve SO 85-12. Motion carried 4-0. 14. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody to postpone GN 85-88. Motion carried 4-0. September 23, 1985 Page 3 SO 85-12 REQUEST BY FEDERAL SIGN FOR A SIGN VARIANCE AT TONY ROMA'S, 8010 BEDFORD EULESS ROAD APPROVED GN 85-88 REQUEST OF IRVING GROVES OF WILLIAMSBURG ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR TWO DRIVEWAY OPENINGS ON RUFE SNOW (POSTPONED AT THE SEPTEMBER 9, 1985 MEETING) POSTPONED GN 85-91 RESOLUTION NO. 85-23, REQUEST BY GENE HUGGINS FOR UTILITY EASEMENT ABANDONMENT IN BLOCK 42CR, RICHLAND TERRACE ADDITION APPROVED GN 85-92 ORDINANCE NO. 1282, ADOPTING SECTION 207(K) OF THE U.S. FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT APPROVED GN 85-93 RESOLUTION NO. 85-25, SUSPENDING LONE STAR GAS COMPANY'S SCHEDULE OF RATES APPROVED '- *18. *19. *20. *21. *22. *23. *24. 25. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to instruct the Staff to continue to negotiate for right-of-way for Hightower Street. Motion carried 4-0. September 23, 1985 Page 4 GN 85-94 ORDINANCE NO. 1283, LITTERING ORDINANCE APPROVED GN 85-95 ACCEPTANCE OF STATE GRANT FOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECTS APPROVED GN 85-96 ORDINANCE NO. 1274, ADOPTING TMRS BUY BACK PROVISION OF FORFEITED PRIOR SERVICE APPROVED PU 85-27 RATIFICATION OF EXPENDITURE OF $7,318.00 TO FERGUSON PUMP AND SUPPLY TO REPAIR ONE 150 H.P. PUMP APPROVED PU 85-28 RESOLUTION NO. 85-24, AUTHORIZING CONTRACT FOR LEASE/PURCHASE EQUIPMENT APPROVED PU 85-29 RENEWAL OF CITY'S LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE APPROVED PU 85-30 RENEWAL OF CITY'S AUTO LIABILITY INSURANCE APPROVED PU 85-31 APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF LAND APPROVED ~ *26. *27. *28. 29. None 30. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to adjourn the meeting of September 23, 1985. Motion carried 4-0. September 23, 1985 Page 5 PW 85-19 AWARD OF BIDS FOR ANIMAL CONTROL AND SERVICE CENTER APPROVED PW 85-20 BIDS FOR STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE APPROVED PAY 85-49 WATAUGA TRUNK SEWER LINE PHASE II CONTRACTOR'S PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3 APPROVED CITIZEN PRESENTATION ADJOURNMENT MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY -'~ \.' ", CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 D rt t Planning and Development epa men: Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 1 \.....Jubject: Zonin~ Ordinance Revision Section 14 and Section Agenda Number: PZ 85-102 Ordinance No. 1284 Section 16 Regarding Warehousing 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 This proposed revision to the Zoning Ordinance would remove warehouse uses, both mini-warehouses and storage warehouses, from the C-2 Commercial District and place them exclusively in the I-Industrial Districts. In addition, a definition has been added for wholesale activities and this use has been placed in the C-2 Commercial District. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the revision to the Zoning Ordinance regarding warehousing and further suggested that a grace period of six months be included during which projects which are currently being proposed be allowed to make application for building permits. - Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Oper . g Budget er I\..... ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM /J I< 1l/~ City Manager , Finance Director 1 Page 1 of 1 " Page 3 P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 ( ( '-- 5. PZ 85-101 _/ Request of R.G.A. Development to rezone Tracts 1, lA, part of Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, and part of Tract 1, A./Hòod Survey, Abstract 683, fromthéir present classification ~orAG (Agriculture) to R-6-T (Townboúses and Garden Homes District)~/ This property is located --- south/of Wilson Lane and west of jKéller-Smithfield Road. Chairman Bowen stated this case was postponed at the last meeting because of a tie vote. He stated the Public Hearing was held at that time. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-101. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 3-1 with Ms. Flippo voting against. 6. PZ 85-102 Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding warehousing. Chairman Bowen stated this request was postponed from the last meeting. He read the contents of the ordinance. Chuck Owen, 6129 Abbott Avenue, came forward. He stated he was against deleting mini-warehouses from the C-2 classification. Mr. Owen felt it would devalue the land zoned C-2. --. James R. Stephens, 3604 San Bar Lane, Colleyville, Texas, came forward. He stated he was in opposition to deleting the mini-warehouses from C-2. He stated they had purchased a piece of land on Davis Boulevard which is 600 feet deep and they plan to put retail on the front and mini warehouses in back. Mr. Stephens said he was not opposed to it in general, but they need it for this tract of land because they are unable to design it for a larger wareho~se. J I I " Page 4 P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 c_ PZ 85-102 APPROVED ( ( Mr. Stephens said he had never built mini warehouses before. He said this change would catch them in the middle of their study and plan. Mr. Stephens said he would request if the Commission does make the change, would they grant them time to complete their study. Mr. Wood asked about a grandfather clause. Mr. Royston stated any changes would not affect the grand father clause, but the Commission could add a time limit. Chairman Bowen stated he felt a 6 month time limit would be sufficient. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-102 subject to a grandfather clause of 6 months from the date of adoption to obtaining a building permit. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 7. PZ 85-103 '- ~/~ //" ../ ,,/ " /,- // Request of Erin's Foods to rezone Lot 6, Block 1, Jack M. Estes Subdivision, from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at 3900 Rufe Snow Drive. ,/~ " ,- ../'" Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing ,to speak in favor of this request to /// please come forward. ,,-' Kenneth C. Adcock, owner of Erin's Food, came forward. He requested approve of this request to be able to compete with the competition. He said customers are driving across 820 to purchase beer. Mr. Adcock said there is commercial all around him and Rufe Snow is to be widened. '. Page 13 ( P & Z Minutes August 22, 1985 Tract 7-Mr. Hallford made the mot to deny PZ 85-101. This mot· was seconded by Ms. Flippo. e motion to deny failed by a vot f 2-2 with Nash and Bowen votin gainst denial. '--- Chairma ap e PZ 85-101. This motion was econded by Ms. Nash, but the motion failed by a vote of 2-2 with Hallford and Flippo voting against. PZ 85-101 TABLED Ms. Nash made the motion to table PZ 85-101 until the next meeting until more Commission members could be present. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion to table carried 4-0. 11. PZ 85-102 Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding warehousing. Chairman Bowen requested this amendment be postponed until proper definitions are written. PZ 85-102 POSTPONED Ms. Nash made the motion to postpone PZ 85-102. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. 12. PZ 85-105 Consideration of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding livestock. \,-" Chairman Bowen said s amendment would allow the ping of livestock in resident· zoning if they have one ck Garvin, 6908 Little Ranch Road, came forward. He said the Morgan Meadows Addition is bordered by drainage ditches. He said if they cannot have horses, they could not sell their property; only a fool would buy 1 to 2 acres if they did not have animals. Mr. Garvin asked for the ones from Morgan Meadows Addition to stand. There were approximately 20 people. ~ ~ , .', " " Page 6 P & Z Hinutes August 8, 1985 ( ( .~ 10. PZ 85-94 Request of Jim Warren, Carry Beck, & Gail Douglas to rezone Lots 3K, 4K, & part of Lots 3 & 4, Calloway Acres Addition, from their present classification of C-1 (Commerc I) to C-2 (Commercial). This prop' ty is located north of Grapevin ighway, bounded on the west by ruggs Drive and on the east by Pa hman Street. Chairman Bowen 0 ed the Public Hearing and ca ed for those wishing to speak in vor of this request to please com forward. Carry eck came forward. He said he and r. Warren are in business t ether and they wanted to move their usiness next door. He said they found they could not because of the -~ zoning. Mr'~ Wood asked if they were changing their business. Mr. Beck said they were not. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request t~ please come forward. There'being no one wishing to speak, the Chair'fa~ closed the Public Hearing.', "', PZ 85-94 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-94 ,,"'1;~is motion was seconded by Mr. Tucke~,arid the motion carried 5-0. 11. PZ 85-102 Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding warehousing. -- Mr. Royston stated the warehouse use contained in C-2 zoning concerned the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council since there were so many mini warehouses going in. He said they requested he draft a change to take warehousing out of C-2 and put in the industrial zoning classification. r Page 7 P & Z Minutes August 8, 1985 '-- - '-' ( ( Jack Roseberry, 8912 Martin Drive, came forward. He said after two years and one month, he had finally got the platting done on his property on Smithfield Road. Mr. Roseberry said he felt this change would be detrimental to the city. He said his lenders say they need office showroom warehouse space. Mr. Roseberry said he would appreciate the Commission reconsidering this change. Tom Wilder, 5125 Davis Blvd., came forward to represent Alan Hamm who was unable to attend the meeting. He said he wanted to express serious concern about this change. Mr. Wilder said he had no problem with dropping the mini warehousing, but there is a large number of retail businesses that require some warehousing. He said they do wholesale out the back door and retail out the front door. Mr. Wilder stated that Mr. Hamm had just built a 10,000 square foot warehouse in C-2 zoning. He said if this change goes through it would be non conforming. Mr. Wilder asked what would happen to vacant land being developed into warehouses in phases. He asked if they would have to request industrial zoning next to residential to make it conform. Mr. Wilder requested the Commission take a closer look at this change. Burk Collins, 5228 Rufe Snow Drive, came forward. He said he doesn't have any property that this change would affect, but he does warehousing, subdivisions, and retail. Mr. Collin9 said one of the weakest areas in North Richland Hills is warehousing. He said this area is not ready for large warehousing but needs smaller warehousing. Mr. Collins said it would be tough to get industrial zoning. l' . .... Page 8 P & Z Minutes August 8, 1985 ( ( ......... Mr. Collins said he felt the City of North Richland Hills would suffer if this change is made. He said they could restrict mini-warehouses to industrial zoning. Carry Beck came forward. He said he and Mr. Warren's business would be affected by this change and he felt the Commission should reconsider. Mr. Royston said this change was to tighten up the large storage warehouses and the mini-warehouses. He said they have no intention to change the contractor' s warehousing. He said this would not affect them. Mr. Tucker said he would like to see some change. He would like to take out the mini warehousing and the large warehousing but not office warehouse. Mr. Tucker said they could change the definition. PZ 85-102 POSTPONED Mr. Tucker made the motion to postpone PZ 85-102 and return it to the City Staff for a change in the definition to take out the retail and leave it in C-2. This motion was seconaed by Mr. Wood and the motion to postpone carried 5-0. 12. PZ 85-40 Consideration of Thoroughfare regarding Starnes Road. Council felt be a C-2-U west of an M-4-U east of Mr. Tucker said Starnes Ro ould Ðavi ulevard and vis. Chairman Bowen called for anyone wishing to speak regarding this matter to please come forward. No one wished to speak. '- ORDINANCE NO. 1284 "'-- BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that Ordinance No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance), adopted January 9, 1984 and as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended at the following section: SECTION III Definitions Add the following: Mini-Warehouse-Enclosed space rented to the general public for storage of personal goods or belongings. Warehouse-Commercial storage, crating services, truck terminal operation. Wholesale Distributor - A distributor of goods for resale. SECTION XIV Revise the following: Section 14.2.8 Hardware and building materials retail and/or wholesale. Delete the following: 14.2.14 Warehousing 14.3.13 Accessory Apartment Add the following: 14.2.14 Wholesale Distributor SECTION XVI Add the following: 16.2.10 Warehousing 16.2.11 All uses of the C-2 Commercial District 16.3.8 Accessory Apartment In connection with the permitted use of a self-storage or mini-warehouse there may be permitted an accessory apartment with a minimum square footage of 650 square feet. Such apartment shall be specifically for the occupancy of a resident manager for the warehouse facility. No person shall be allowed to occupy the said apartment who is not an employee of the company operating the warehouse facility and no employee of said company occupying the on-site apartment shall be under (18) years of age. \---.- Page 2 '- APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. ~æ~ Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission ~~ß2--'-:7~ Secretpry Planni6g & ~Gft~iSSiOn PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1985. Mayor - ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney '..... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS T Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-103 "t- SUbject: Zoning Application 3900 Rufe Snow Drive Ordinance No. 1285 T This Zoning Application is presented on the existing commercial tract located on the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Harmonson Road. The requested rezoning is from C-l Commercial to C-l SU Commercial Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-Premises Consumption. The applicants operate an existing convenience-type grocery store at this location and wish to sell package beer with their grocery sales. T T RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-103. T T T T -' T T T T T T Finance Review T Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) , Operating BUdge~ ~J4. J2 T ~D.partm.n H~~d Slg-natur. L CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡21J1r/~ , City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 -'7 :J'~~ C-1· . A(~~f·'îONING MAP r/ I. / ~ -.-.- -{ ( Page 4 P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 ( '--- /'/ / .// PZ 85-102///' APPROVED /// ,,/ / / '- -- 7. PZ 85-103 Mr. Stephens said he had never built mini warehouses before. He said this change would catch them in the middle of their study and plan. Mr. Stephens said he would request if.·the Commission does make the change, would they grant them time to complete their study. / Mr. Wood asked about a grandfather clause ./ ,. / Mr~ Royston stated any changes would ,//not affect the grand father clause, but the Commission could add a time limit. Chairman Bowen stated he felt a 6 month time limit would be sufficient. Hr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-102 subject to a grandfather clause of 6 months from the date of adoption to obtaining a building permit. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Erin's Foods to rezone Lot 6, Block 1, Jack M. Estes Subdivision, from its present classification of C-l (Commercial) to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at 3900 Rufe Snow Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Kenneth C. Adcock, owner of Erin's Food, came forward. He requested approve of this request to be able to compete with the competition. He said customers are driving across 820 to purchase beer. Mr. Adcock said there is commercial all around him and Rufe Snow is to be widened. 4:. Page 5 ( P & Z Hinutes September 12, 1985 "-- PZ 85-103 APPROVED ( Chairman Bowen stated that since the bond program passed, Rufe Snow would be widened to 5 lanes. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Bowen said Mr. Adcock would have to furnish a name for the City Council for the Specific Use. Mr. Adcock said it would be his name. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 85-103. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 3-1 with Mr. Wood voting against. 8. PZ 85-104 /// /./// /// // ,/ # - ,/ // /' // ,/ Request of B & C Oil Company to rezone Lot A2, Parchman Addition, from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at 6955 Grapevine Highway. /// , Chairman Bowen/~pened the Public Hearing and' called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to ~~ßase come forward. / / ;//' Otis Campsey, operator of B & COil Company, came forward. He said this request would help his sales and would bring in more revenue for the city. He said he felt it would help sell other items. Mr. Campsey said there were some churches in the area, but he had a surveyor measure them and it was 1416.40 feet from the Northeast Assembly of God Church and 1184.40 from the North Richland Hills Baptist Church. -----__·_·________.___h__________ ( , \. '-- . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 9, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-103 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-l TO C-1-SU REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 148 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. UJ. ûtk:- P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '- Zoning Review PZ 85-103 page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 pz- <65-/ ().3 ,-*.. . ---....-..-.-- ~~ '-- " 2- 00. f ... '" -- 1\ $~ -f/ r I., '., " .. ~ ~ " .z1'£ "i' 11. £ ~#NC. '., ì\ . \¡ \~ ~ ~ ") z (; AS ~ PUM~.r \J /STORY ~ "I I ~ I{ J, a- 'I) \S T/¿E BL.06 \ ~ ~~ 27 r \) '" ~ .I;,~ . '. \ ~, '~ : \I~ ~I ') LOT ~ ~ \~ . --·--¿J00Ck---1 ~ , l.- "'J~ . ç ~ AJ',PHAI- í /J/'i/ek/A/(Ç '" ~ ~~ -~ ' --{ .~ /z 8. a- S" ¡{. I It ..~ " - .Po W''''-.€ "/N' F ,: ..., - ~"QG'" ~ -.......::.... " " '~~ " "I "I I"' ~a ..LT,:;;CN ~ I -- ~tJð~ IIAPA/ltJAlSON ROAD .zc' fi.5'P/ý/lL r s-r " .. .',. ........~_."._...,- PLAT OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, JACK M. ESTES, JR., SUBDIVISION 'OF 24.77 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE A. G. WALKER SU1,WEY, NOW IN THE ,~__ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT COùNTY, TEXAS. ACCORDING TO PLAT FILED IN BOOK 3S8-A, PAGE 113, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS .. .' n I, SCALf 1"~3d NO ENCROACHMEHTS OTHER THAN SHOWN ..,-.. ~ Co or ~.. ' . .'~'" '. r.f'.t'· I.~ '" * ...." -~ " ~ -:<....... '*.. "~ '. ,.' ... ............., ..., , . ~r";' t'''''·.tou,," "', .;I.a..........··· '. .of \ ~' 11';·3 .·9:f "',., ~. ,'0 .. ~, ...,."....~'" f . ., ~C SU",~,· '_IÞ L..EGENO Love BRAi\JEJ:('j..\., ~ REGISTERED PUBLIC SURV[YO¡~ 1028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVt . 834-3477 76 \11 . IRON PIN o IRON PIPE Å aOIS O'ARC ,5TAKE -X-X- FENCE _11_11_ POWER I..IN£ .,.~ _""""" 'LI_~J -~ -' _1·------ . l '.I ! I¡"":' _T_T- TEI..EPHONE L..INE C CQNCRETE MON Job #7464 DATE 4-16-73 '\ '~.""-'''1. l' '- ORDINANCE NO. 1285 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-103 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. BEING Lot 6, Block 1, Jack M. Estes, Jr. Subdivision, and addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-A, Page 113, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at 3900 Rufe Snow Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONI 1985. SEPTEMBER, CHA RMAN PLANNING AND ~~J2 ~ ~ SECRETA PLANNINÓ-""'" ~ISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-103 IS HEREBY REZONED C-1-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION THIS 14th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1985. MAYOR ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: '- ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS l Department: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 PZ 85-104 Agenda Number: l'-Subject: Zoning Application 6955 Grapevine Highway Ordinance No. 1286 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 This Zoning Application is presented on the existing commercial tract located on the north side of Grapevine Highway between Parchman Street and Vance Road. The requested rezoning is from C-l Commercial to C-l SU Commercial Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-Premises Consumption. The applicants have an existing Service Station-Convenience Store at this location and wish to sell package beer in conjunction with their food sales. In the Commission's deliberations regarding this application it was noted that written opposition was voiced by the North Richland Hills Baptist Church to this case. They indicated that although the existing church buildings are somewhat removed from the subject property the church owns property immediately adjacent to the subject property on the north side. The Commission did note, based upon submittals by the applicant, that the legal definition of the required separation between church "house" locations and liquor sales locations had been met without difficulty. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-104. 1 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~ ¿;2operat,ng BU~d9.t _ ¿ . i /.... :.ï4fl I? Øt ~ 1 Óepartme t Head ignature ' City Manager - CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 ~ ...... ~/ .,...-, /'1x:- --\. -r-c ~, Ii 1 ""v"" I < U---- .,.... : "\ 'C;" \.. ,,~T (~~.;¡~ 1 ~ j 'OOT. "CH"'O E"M~' I ,lj:: : ,_ _ c:r=:- ' I -;;~Î'::' " ~\ , .,~ ~,,-:-i ~l . 'UHlOO "'0. SCHOOL . . . -...~;} 1-_ ¡--: 'I ~....--............ .' ,I, "-L' .r~. 1 ~ , _\1.11 -., , \.. ' r'--.r-. .L, ~ ¡ " I - I 'I r-- ~~ ~'~~~ ,', ',"1 ',: Ii' I \ ~'~T '- 'I'" 1'1 . ,I 1c::==JJ i' ! ' Îl.' ~'~ ~_' --jL , '.,' J f.- . ~,',' " ~J I -II . I I I -' I ll! .f ' ' ' ~--'-.-,.¡..'..'" r f¡~ ,r- 'W L..JJ"" J 'r-'-~ 'T-- -._~ ' . _ - ( , c.. i tf' I I.: µ ~~3 ,l , .... _ ! L __~. .:::J'--: /' ~\" I. ~' 'I"~~~~'~>:L I . -4- . --::', - j:Î . - ,,---t' -- Ii"' _-t-" -~15 - ~~ ~ . ~I(""."'.'" ~!i --;, ¡I· , ¡- -~- - 'it~ __ 1---\ ---\.'-- '---' '-: ? ~~fJ.:::1 '/ J ',', ~:r::~~~% I Iii ,'\I - - _ :::- ~_~.-~~;-\\-~ ~ ~\ :~ ~~~': í SC~' .i: II! c-1-r=~~;rT.'~ Ii Þ.,f'1 II - ~.~\::.~~~~~ / ~~ 1l ~ -,J"~_ .Il ,¡ I~-- '! I .!----"'- ~\~ \ '\ l",~~_'''f-J..:, I I ---1~- '::J~~I 'III', ~R~- I, i I {Dx- IT~ " .: "y)- 71' ::.. ----it ........ Ff- c_ ? ,P u L... I" ..--'( . --=:J - 11'11 il" " ;~...J I I': ,~ .--( /! ! I II ' I , ; , !d I : I : Ic:::::1C -' - .---...........-..............., _' ,---,-~,-, ~ ---"----::----'--'- '-- . ~-,--,W . ·-I-i µP " !" ~ , 1 I I I B, 'I I I I":! .,! [TiT' ïTTl r I , I ! fE Cr:niTTTn n --¡-ff ~~ ~ ~ r-:.. ' 1./'0- 'I---'t· . -' ,,_~ . ~' < :::. '-' . '-~ ."P \I EJ !: ,to :;: 1 I 'I!: ¡ , ! , -----< -; .L. .- - . I I IJ ! ' ' ,-...., _~' .'<:,~...,. ,ttl., ,- .:...~\ ' " Ii! III I : i ¡-:-ï ¡: t", '. I' '. '. ~.~._-= ==.- . , ' ~ '. 1 I "ý=1ó-' ,., \1 - -~r- t~-----<_~ ::=r---il ,I:,! ¡ II~!! ¡ I: ~., C- E '...~~:/ I: ~ I: 1 I', ~__-=:=!II/J,.)~.\' I: ,,\/'V^," ~~I .~- -1",,'1 _ " ,'"-tJ.,'!; - - ;:mD::i~ / \ \ \ . I v~~ .-l ' ?'¡::, I , R~. -D~ R-7-MF 1 / ~~\~!r-T I: ,- ~ ,\ ! I : , \ '" ~ p~_ ! Xì..... I' If-- ..;-' ~ 'Y';, . ~ . r i ~ ";t):'- 'f.0~ -J - --,. /~:¡ b-- .', LRn;;.L éV"\'<~' \J, !. (/ C- ",.¡II ~ I=C 'OOTH M" I---!" --L -. /-... . ,,0 _ . \/' I i........, ~" C I -~ r--c- "CHC"O ' ..:::--- ,-1 - 1---, /' - ", ' .,',,- ~~ - -~ oo~ EL[M. . ~--- .,- ""-1- '----; /)., ---- ~\I ,'" I . h,\1' ;1t--'-.r.....-" - __ " ~ ~ U. R :"~~ ! ~.¡I ~1::5'1 /_ ¡- ..;...-~ 1 >' nl..~S-1O"1 I . ~~ùXL ~p.~ .:' f -~ ~ ¿ T ~O~:~ R-7- ~ ~c,y~ 1..~5U~ ~- I R-8 =~.I.3:: I - ~ --too... f-- .t= ~ol" ~F - \ I i""--1 , .. 'l~~C- l' .\... I- ~ .. '" 1247 ' I.~ ~ ~ ~ R-7-M~>:œ¡n: '-t~ ~_I , II -=:t'::::: I I i ¡ Ç.: - ~"- ~e-2- hit --~ ---- r= 9 -3' ¡L......J: -- r--- ~'~ Q"""'¡~ ~ - - -' I r---<;;..,.- 1-, I ~ c;:¡ =:= e-2 ~ "" q i ,¡ /(,+.... ~~. i}-o, f-- :. ~~~I ¡ ,I :; >--- c- -If rl ~ ! II f-I-- c-t¡ /j' ~W8 :'\.::.J. ---'J't:: -;;'\'oJ : "1l-~-¡OV 1 ~c-ìTMr 8;' ~~ - ~.~S-04- ~ - ~1"1 To J~~ LR - - 0-:::5- - . TO = ' ~ i : c,·z 1.( c:~ __ " C-I Su* --,..¡ ì : ! 'I- ,,).'" --- 7 ~ ~:;f~ 1 I lJ I Ii' , II! ! II II, ,:.' =¡- I-2 C -, : ~:;:: CO ffi' , . ~ ¡ 1 N<S) ill ~, ~ v;/, :: " I : . ¡; II i ,I~ ~ -- ',,~'\.~ . -- ~ .:::--1 f- ;CYk ~:.:,~ ,/, ¡ ~r-- --:---- -- ~" ... i-. "~/...< ")'J ! I i I II I I I r= -~=-..:::(- ~~ ~Y~.:ý/I!!':;·'" 1 ""'.J ~II . t::::., ~ -J~:';¡/ I I ! :. 'i II,: _J J ::_i-:.....:~'~f= ~~~/I'/^D_~ ',' ::7' ~ :;. __~.', \"-1.. f,-E E . ;~ tjr--!iL ~'<; , 1/'1 c- I G""!!.:~~~E'L?-~~ ....--- '---1-rE-i c~ , ".-, ~;--- ~~:r:~ ~~ ~ í --.r: . ,.- -~ - f-Þ~ __:r- . .. ~ , --, c------i : ~, I-- I ,1----11-" ~-: ,1 .. .. '--." ~ L... ho '" '., _ R-5-D III I!: !! ' I : , I . RI-1';~F I I _I .- I~ I -- 1-Þ- "Þ- ~ C-221 C- /1" (¡:¡ / ~ {;-ü! ZONING MAP OF NORTE I I " I ~Q -(.\} r-2 ~\V o 500 r-.,.¡-_- 1000 1500 2C i l ':'- . -/ G<~ L . ~ ,Î,'/k£- ~ ADOPTED ~Mß~.~,_ ('If;" Page 5 ~ P & Z Hinutes September 12, 1985 (- -'- -----.---.,..,.._-~_._-_. """"--------. -. ",-- ------.0.__._.--- _ _____~_ __ ___ __ ,. Chairman Bowen stated that since the bond program passed, Rufe Snow would be widened to 5 lanes. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. ./,JO / Chairman Bowen said Xr. Adcock would have to furnish a name for the City Council for the Specific Use. Hr. Adcock said it would be his name. PZ 85-'103 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 85-103. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 3-1 with Mr. Wood voting against. .. /' ./ /' ,/ /" 8. PZ 85-104 Request of B & C Oil Company to rezone Lot A2, Parchman Addition, from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at 6955 Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. ~ Otis Campsey, operator of B & COil Company, came forward. He said this request would help his sales and would bring in more revenue for the city. He said he felt it would help sell other items. Mr. Campsey said there were some churches in the area, but he had a surveyor measure them and it was 1416.40 feet from the Northeast Assembly of God Church and 1184.40 from the North Richland Hills Baptist Church. Page 6 P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 ( (- " - '--~ Mr. Wood said he thought there was a church across the street. Chairman Bowen stated there was a bank across the street. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Chairman Bowen stated the Commission received a letter from Phil Simmons, Pastor of North Richland Hills Baptist, in opposition to this request. He stated he would be present, but had to be out of town. Hr. ~'¡ood said he agreed with this letter. He said this property joins church property to the north and west. He said this property is used for church purposes on Sunday and during the week. Chairman Bowen stated they had a case in the Smithfield area that was 305 feet from the front door of the church which the Commission and City Council denied. He said it was taken to court and we lost. Chairban Bowen closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-104 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-104. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 3-1 with Mr. Wood voting against. 9. PZ 85-105 ----------------.....---.-----.-.-----.----- Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding the keeping of livestock. Chairman Bowen stated this request was postponed at the last meeting. He said the Commission agreed that livestock should not be kept in just any residential area and requested the City Staff draft a new category. He said the new category would be R-1-S. '- --~._---------- ._-_.._-'~--._._-'_."#_' £- , dVo'éth cVichtand cI!-ilt 23aþ~L2t Chmch ,.~/ ~~ ;;) v - / ~' '\'-I~ I - "-- 400 1 VANCE ROAD FORT WORTH, TEXAS 7 61 1 8 (817) 284-9206 September 3, 1985 Wanda Calvert, Coordinator Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hill, TX 76118 Dear Miss Calvert, I received your letter regarding the rezoning requested by B. & C. Oil Company to rezone Lot A-2, Parchman Addition from it's present classification of C-l to C-l, Specific Use, Sale of Beer for Off- Premises consumption, located at 6959 Grapevine Highway. I will be out of town on September 25th; however, because of the close proximity of B. & C. Oil Company to our church property, and with the potential of our building buildings almost adjacent to that property sometime in the future, I must strongly voice opposition to the sale of alcoholic beverages at that location. I am not sure of the normal zoning audience, but our property runs pretty close, I believe, to that site. I expect that if the membership of this church knew of the request, you would hear considerable opposition from across the city of North Richland Hills. I am planning to talk to Marie Hinkle, who is one of our Council persons, about this as well, since she is a member of our church. Thank you ,for the opportunity to express my opposition through mail, and I hope 'that it will be presented to the commission when you make your decision. Sincerely, /,)/' '7 /1 ( F/~ e5{¿, 7ll,/lzh'¿,:::/ Phil Simmons, Pastor PES/cjw - TOWER OF TRUTH, Symbols; STAR of David. - Old Testament- CROSS. New Testament and Christ - FISH, Christian and his work - FOUNTAIN OF WATERS. Living presence of Holy Spirit _ CROSS IN FISH, God's way of salvation (...Christ in you. Col. 1:27) ,/ t t - "-- . CONSUL TING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. August 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ONING ~ASE PZ 85-104 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-1 TO 'C-1 SU' REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 148 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. flduwit/, ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R~JA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development - Zoning Review PZ 85-104 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 \. J :Jhe Aonee,. '- Companie.1 - ',---- p, O. BOX 1838 3420 EAST VICKERY BLVO FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76101 PHONE 817/531-3776 August 6, 1985 City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Ms. Calbert, This is to confirm that Pioneer Oil Company is the owner of property located at 6955 Grapevine Highway. B & C Oil Co. _ Otis Campsey leases this location from us and operates a self- service gasoline station and convenience store. We have no objections to his obtaining a beer license for off premises consumption at this location. Should further information be required, please contact us. Sincerely, .f~4~ Sam H. Gann Asst. Secretary SHGllmh "--- 1'- 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,/ / 1 ",// --- I p:z R5-/tJ~ 51- tJ ~ tftþ. B~' / C~ ,'t'r pP~ 01 !Í- ~>Qo,~ '" / A( 9'ð 0 07' ¿5 "e. 144 ~ .- V¡ \S' ~ " " ~\ 1\ (J'\ ...... ./ """ ~ , ~ , ~ 1\ ~ ~ " . C9 J.1c, \j, ~ ~ ~ // " ~ ~ / FCJB,_ /7511 I . -.._.~--_._____.__..._____.:..._ '.·..A__._.__ ~_ _____._..__.__ , .s. 4.:5 þ ,-:~} . .£'. /50 I? S7:4Tê H~); A/? /2'/ FIE L D NOT E S T ALL that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the A. G, WALKi., SURVEY, Tarrant County, Texas, said tract or pdrcel of land bcinu d part of Lot ^ of ,T PARCH~IAN ADDITION as recorded in Volullle 3H8-Q, Page 149, Deed Records. TJrrant Count/, Texas, and further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a steel rod in the ì~esterly R.O.l·J. line of State Hiqh\'¡dY flo. 11.1, said 1 point being r~orth 48 degrees East a distance of 174.3 feet frol;! the 1:IO';t Southerly . corner of said Lot A, Parchn~n Addition; THENCE North 41 degrees 51 mi~utes 25 seconds West a distance of lQ3.G5 feet to a st~el rod in the Easterly R.O.H. line of Parchnan Street; 1 THENCE North 0 degrees 20 minutes 15 seconds East, with said Easterly R.O.W.. a oi5- tance of U.54 feet to a bois d'arc stake for corner; THENCE North 48 degrees 07 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 144.1 feet to it st~01 Trod for corner; THUICL South 41 deqrees 50 IlIinutes 50 seconds East a distance of 199.65 fed to (j steel rod for corner in Ole \·/esterly fLO,\'J, line of State ili'Jhl'lùy ~j(). 121; 1 THUKE South 4ß degrees 00 minutes \'Jest, \'Jith said \'Jesterly R.O.;~. lifl{~. it distance of 150.0 feet to the place of beginning and containinc¡ 0.69 acre of land, I:ore or less. as surveyed by David C. Moak, Registered Public Surveyor flS6 in Aµril 1974, -- 1 1 The Pial h('It'OIl IS a Irut', correrl and accurale rcprcsenlaÙon of Ihe prOpt'rty as dcl('rmlllt'd h, sur\t'y, tht' IInl's and dlmenswns of said property ht'lnK as IIIdicatcd by the PIal, 1~1i'.A",..I',<:"II(JlI und 'HI<' "t huddlllll;. .111.1 lilt- "((Ji.f"U:Ht~~ an.. G...._ _,11u..", J.ll 1tRpr··"'''·ln(.nt~ h(ill,lJ( ...1111111 [ht L\JUlldf1l~' ..J ~..t th~1 J1L,pi. d,'t', \ .·d 1'~ Ât [,tH,\d~, ,....-r4 Q:.Id frr.~ lht, oIrwpefl:, hlll:lo lilll ÜH;lð',1 ",I \lid( dlul. ,wd (hat It\!' dlslance frum IIII' IH·¡¡.('~( 11111·.....('1(1111-: ~11t't'I (JI road IS as shoWIl 011 said Plat. There alcf)) en(lOarhm('nls, COil lilt Is. µrol Il¡.... 1011"', III ;ll>p<l1('1I1 (',¡.,eIlWIlIs, ('xc epl as shown. Ala- ;/ r;: ~L SCALE /": SO' LEGEND - .. . . . . . . . . STEEL RODS O. . . . . . . . . IRON PIPE -/ / - . . . . . . POWER OR TELEPHONE LINE -x-. . . . . . . FENCE o. . . . , . . . . BOIS D' ARC STK -....-------- Z'~ e. ~ REGISTERED Pl:nI.IC SURVEYOR P. O. BOX 641 ~68'221' HURST, TEXAS Date 4 - /ð-7r /~? ¿,? jl . . . -"- N SC"'L& 1"·200' ',- !-"'-. p Z- ?J5 _It) l' GLEHVtEW ORNE - CROe6 aT ... w ~ ~ ~ ,\Ø :) '" o f), (=.. =::.:.~ \r - -" .-. ~[ .. ~ . ~ 5MT"*-HC& NOIIITÞ\ ftté.H\..Ma H'........ ..".\.T C,...","C.M t- !.AI ~ ~ % ~ % U 0: t: o .' ..c ... 0 i cr: &.t.I \) Z ~ 4'~ / SKETCH SHC7WING DISTANCES 'tOM SERVICE STATION AT 6955 GRAPEVltfE HIGHWAY TO NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IAPTtST CHURCH AND NORTHEAST ASSEMlLEY OF GOD CHURCH IN THE A. G. WALK!. suaVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1630 IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TAa.IAJT COUNTY, TEXAS. 1'à.. pl.t......e8IIP.¡ø ......... ....I'8ØG~..~..~ from c:liatanc:e.s Qlq'._ eo 'the ground. ø-~ p/-~-Â~ Registered Public Surveyor Mo. 2014 Date 7' -'l¿J ~K 5 . ..,"- . "''''-\\.'*~'' ~~... þ...~...... '~:L ~ ~ 01/ .~ " ... ... . ."'...... . . ~ . .. ",......... ...1.... . WALrr.R w.. WARD . ".. -.. #.. . ~I. ....... .... ,..., .-0.... ~ ~. ( " . ~ . . ~~ð~·.!'.4 ......~. . f .. 'I;:"J.··~"" .. ....... ~u"~ ~ ..... ... ORDINANCE NO. 1286 '--- AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-104 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. BEING Lot A2, Parchman Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 75, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at 6955-Grapevine Highway. APPROVED 1985. CO~Iæ ~F SEPTEMBER, ~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION --"'if::2. I' ~ PLANNING AND ZONING C MMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-104 IS HEREBY REZONED C-I-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION THIS 14th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1985. MAYOR ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: '- ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning an~ Development Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-105 \ l"- Subject: Zoning Ordinance Revision -- Keeping of Livestock Ordinance No. 1287 l This proposed Zoning Ordinance revision deals with the provision for keeping of livestock, i.e., horses and cows, in residential zones. In the current ordinance the keeping of livestock is prohibited in all zones except the AG Agriculture District. In the AG District a tract had to contain at least (2) two acres in order to allow livestock. A group of citizens, mainly from the Morgan Meadows Addition had appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission asking that a revision to the ordinance be considered which would allow residences in the area to continue, or to begin keeping horses on their property. After some discussion with the Commission it was determined that the best approach for allowing this change would be the creation of a specific district which would combine the controls of the R-l District with a provision for allowing the keeping of livestock. The attached draft ordinance would create the proposed R-I-S Special Residential District which would incorporate these needs. The proposed provisions of the R-l-S District would create a district similar in character to the R-l Residential Single Family District with the addition of a minimum of (1) acre lots and the ability to keep livestock as an approved auxiliary use. RECOMMENDATION: The P~nning and Zoning Commission recommended that the Zoning Ordinance Revision creating the R-l-S District be approved. l 1 1 1 1 1 ",-. 1 T T T T T T Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) r~:¡:)ª~ I<W~ r· Departmènt ead Signature City Manager - CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review - Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director - Page 1 of 1 Page 6 ( P & Z Ninutes September 12, 1985 ( ',-- '-- / ,,/ /;/ / /' 9. PZ 85-105 '- Mr. Wood said he thought there was a church across the street. " Chairman Bowen stated there was a bank across the street. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. /' Chairman Bowen stated the Commission received a letter from Phil Simmons, Pastor of North Richland Hills Baptist, in'opposition to this , request. / He stated he would be presen~: but had to be out of town. ,// Mr;'Wood said he agreed with this ,letter. He said this property joins / ~. church property to the north and west. / He said this property is used for church purposes on Sunday and during the week. Chairman Bowen stated they had a case in the Smithfield area that was 305 feet from the front door of the church which the Commission and City Council denied. He said it was taken to court and we lost. Chairñan Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-104. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 3-1 with Mr. Wood voting against. Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding the keeping of livestock. Chairman Bowen stated this request was postponed at the last meeting. He said the Commission agreed that livestock should not be kept in just any residential area and requested the City Staff draft a new category. He said the new category would be R-1-S. Page 7 ~ P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 '-- PZ 85-105 APPROVED ( Chairman Bowen asked if anyone wished to speak regarding this matter. Mack Garvin, 6908 Little Ranch Road, came forward. He said he had read the ordinance and it looks good to him. Chairman Bowen said the individual would need to request the zoning change. He said the ones who are not grandfathered, may request the new zoning classification. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-105. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. 10. PZ 85-106 '- / // - ¿ -------~--_.._--....-.~,.~._-----.. _. -_.. Request of World Class Motors, Ltd. to rezone Lot 5, Kips Big Boy Addition, from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos. This property is located at 7755 Northeast Looi 820. ,../' Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor pf this request to please come fo~ard. ./ John R. Madd6x, General Manager for Worlà·Class Motors, came forward. He said they plan to sell fine European cars~ He said they have another place ;nGrand Prairie on 360 and requests ,/they be allowed to open World Class ~ Motors, Phase 2 in North Richland // Hills. Mr. Maddox showed the ~ Commission pictures of the type of ~/' cars he plans to have. He said they // desire to own and operate a retail ~/ outlet with a showroom and outside parking. Mr. Maddox said they would not take up the required parking spaces. Chairman Bowen asked if this would be a low volume dealership. Mr. Maddox said it would be, but said he has a waiting list for cars. · Page 13 ( P & Z Minutes August 22, 1985 ( Tract 7-Mr. Hallford made the motio to deny PZ 85-101. This motion seconded by Ms. Flippo. The m ion to deny failed by a vote of 2- ith Nash and Bowen voting against nial. .- '- Chairman Bowen made approve PZ 85-101 This motion was seconded by Ms. ash, but the motion failed by a te of 2-2 with Hallford and Flippo oting against. PZ 85-101 TABLED h made the motion to table -101 until the next meeting until ore Commission members could be present. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion to table carried 4-0. 11. PZ 85-102 Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding warehousing. Chairman Bowen requested this amendment be postponed until proper definitions are written. Ms. Nash made the motion to postpone PZ 85-102. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. 12. PZ 85-105 Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding livestock. Chairman Bowen said this amendment would allow the keeping of livestock in residential zoning if they have one acre. '-' Mack Garvin, 6908 Little Ranch Road, came forward. He said the Morgan Meadows Addition is bordered by drainage ditches. He said if they cannot have horses, they could not sell their property; only a fool would buy 1 to 2 acres if they did not have animals. Mr. Garvin asked for the ones from Morgan Meadows Addition to stand. There were approximately 20 people. Page 14 P & Z Minutes August 22, 1985 '- - .- ( ( Julie Stone, 6925 Meadow Road, came forward. She said she was a resident of Morgan Meadows and a Real Estate agent. She said the purpose for the acreage was to have livestock. Ms. Stone said she had a house sold until they found out they could not have horses. She said this ordinance is hurting the marketability of Morgan Meadows and she requests the Commission change it to allow livestock. Jim Keating, 6824 Little Ranch Road, came forward. He requested they be allowed to keep livestock. James Bellomy, 6912 Little Ranch Road, came forward. He said he loves horses. He said they bought their home 8 years ago and this is a nice area. George Tucker, 3907 Diamond Loch, came forward. He said there can be a real problem. He said he has one acre in Diamond Loch and if he decided he wanted a horse, his neighbors would shoot him. Mr. Tucker said he helped write this ordinance and feels this change could cause problems in other subdivisions. Charles Templin, Meadow Road, came forward. He stated this area was developed for a rural area and livestock. He said there would be lots of wasted property and it would be an eyesore. Ellen Smith, Little Ranch Road, came forward. She said the area had been flooded, but she moved there for the horses. She said if you take away the horses, they have nothing. Bob Grant, 7809 Meadow Road, came forward. He asked if there could be a variance to the ordinance. Chairman Bowen stated the Commission cannot grant a variance. Page 15 P & Z Minutes August 22, 1985 '- - - ( ( Marie Graham, 6916 Meadow Road, came forward. She said she had a Psycologist tell her to put her kids on horses and the live country life style and she will not have problems. She said this is a good American life style. Ms. Graham said let us keep what we have and we won't have to go to the Psyco ward. Jaunita Paxton, 6800 Little Ranch Road, came forward. She said most of the property owners have two acres and if they cannot keep horses, they don't need the land, they might as well sell and put lots of houses there. She said it is in a flood plain. Ms. Nash said she wondered if the Commission could postpone this until they can consider the subject further. Chairman Bowen said they might consider a new zoning classification. Lady in audience: "Why was the zoning changed?" Mr. Royston stated the property had always been zoned single family resid~ntial, but when the new ordinance was passed January, 1984, it stated only livestock could be in Agricultural zoning with two acres. Mr. Garvin came forward. He asked the Commission to come out and look at their area and see that they need a new ordinance. Wanda Kaufman, 6704 Meadow Road, came forward. She stated she has 3 acres and it would be useless if they cannot have horses. Page 16 P & Z Minutes August 22, 1985 ( ( - ',-- PZ 85~105 POSTPONED Ms. Nash made the motion to postpone PZ 85-105 and refer it back to the City Staff to consider what can be done. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:45 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission '- , .. ~ . ORDINANCE NO. 1287 ''-" BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that Ordinance No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance), adopted January 9, 1984 and as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended at the following section: SECTION VII R-1-S SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT 7A.l PURPOSE The R-1-S District is intended to permit the low density development of single family dwelling units in a quasi-rural setting. The District is specifically constituted to allow for the keeping of livestock in a residential setting. 7A.2 PERMITTED USES The following are the only permitted uses within the R-1-S District and are subject to the general conditions of this section and other sections as applicable: 7A.2.1 Single Family Detached dwelling units. 7A.2.2 Public Parks and Playgrounds. 7A.3 PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) USES 7A.3.1 Recreational facilities in conjunction with residential uses. '- 7A.4 CONDITIONAL USES 7A.4.1 Churches, Public Schools, Fire Stations, water wells, water storage and pumping facilities to the following conditions: 7A.4.2 Fences: see Section XXIV, Subsection 24.13. 7A.4.3 A minimum of (10) ten percent of the gross lot area shall be maintained in landscaped open area for each conditional use. 7A.5 GENERAL CONDITIONS 7A.5.1 Lot Area Requireménts: (a) Minimum lot area: Every lot within the R-I-S District shall be at least (1) one acre in size. (b) Minimum lot width: Every lot within this District shall be at least (85) eighty-five feet in width measured at the front building line. (See Section XXIV for lot widths of irregular and/or cul-de-sac lots). (c) Minimum lot depth: Every lot within this District shall be at least (120) one hundred-twenty feet average depth. 7A.5.2 Minimum Dwelling Unit Size: See Section XXIV 7A.5.3 Building Line Requirements: (a) Minimum Front Building Line: There shall be a front building line of at least (25) twenty-five feet. ',--, · Page 2 "- (b) Minimum Side Building Line: There shall be a side building line of at least (7) seven feet on each side of the bUilding. This shall be measured from the nearest exterior side wall of the building to the nearest property line. The side bUilding line of corner lots adjacent to a side street shall be at least 920) twenty feet. The side building line of corner lots having adjoining structures fronting on (2) two adjacent property lines shall be at least (30) thirty feet. (c) Minimum Rear Building Line: There shall be a rear building line established by using the formula of: (20%) twenty percent of the lot area must be behind the rear wall of the structure. However, in no case shall the rear building line be closer than (10) ten feet from the rear property line or closer than (5) five feet to any rear easement. 7A.5.4 Height Restrictions: No building shall exceed (38) thirty-eight feet in height. 7A.5.5 Fences: See Section XXIV 7A.5.6 Parking: Off-street parking space shall be provided on the lots to accommodate (4) four cars for each dwelling unit. At least two of such spaces shall be covered; however, nor supporting member of any garage, carport or other automobile storage structure shall be located within the required front building set back line. --- 7A.5.7 Accessory BUildings: Permanent accessory buildings requiring a foundation, including tool sheds, greenhouses, and stables, shall be permitted only in the rear yard which exceeds the minimum rear yard requirements. Location of stables and/or other accessory buildings associated with the keeping of livestock shall also be subject to the provisions of Chapter 4 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. 7A.5.8 Customary Home Occupations: The following home occupations may be allowed unless they become judged detrimental or injurious to the adjoining property by the City Enforcement Officer: (a) musician (b) care of not more than (4) four children not related by blood, marriage, or adoption. (c) dressmaking (d) washing and ironing (e) limited sales of household cleaning products, cosmetics, or jewelry. 7A.6 PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS PD uses shall be subject to R-1-S general conditions (see Section VII, Subsection 7A.5) with the exception of minimum lot area and minimum building lines which will be imposed by the Site Plan and the ordinance adopting said Site Plan. "-- "---.. ....- Page 3 ',-- Revise the following: Agriculture and livestock uses may be conducted in the AG-Agriculture and the R-1-S Residential zones, provided, however, that neither livestock nor fowl may occupy andy lot of less than (1) one acre in size. All such livestock or fowl kept in these zones shall be subject to all the provisions of Chapter 4 or the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. SECTION XXIV APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. Adil ~ Chaírman Planning & Zoning Commission -~ ~/ -.f, _ ._., ç,þ~~,,~/;:, ~ I " I' ~ ry Planning & Zoning C mmission PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1985. ATTEST: Mayor Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney '-' ( CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS J Department: I I _ ~)Ubject: Planning and DeV'eloþm.ent Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-106 Zonin2 Application 7755 Northeast Loop 820 Ordinance No. 1288 r I '. .... ...,...'.<..'_-_:......,' This Zoning Application i.s ¡>r;e"..nted on the existing C011\1D.'i.'¢.ia1..building located on the north side of Loop 820111\1D.é~iately.east of Grapevine.Hi8~way~nd1>ehind the Captain D's Restaurant on Bedford Eu~..s"<;&C?,~.>~~.req\J.(!stedrezon:tt'ta:tsifrømC-l Commercial to C-l SU Commercial SpeciflciU~~~~~.oftJ,,~~.A.u~01nobiles.. 'r1\e<p\J.rpC?se.for the request is to allow the applicant tO~~1:'..~'~~~~\J.s.in.ss,WorldClassJt~;?rs,<from this location. The applicant states that hisbuøitt.ss<ê:lealsexelusivelyln luxµrY<European Autos. i r ! r ! ~ ! r ì r I I r i i '-'" r ¡ I The Staff noted, that due to tn. relative inaccessibility of the site no high volume sales operation can be expected.. .In addition, the latest propòsed revision to the freeway interchange design as .it -relates to both Davis Boulevard and Grapevine Highway place this entire tract in future jeopardy because of needed right of way acquisition. RECOMMENDATION: Tbe Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-106. I ..... L í I L Finance Review Acct. Number Sufffclent Funds AvaHable Source of Funds: ; Bonds (GO/Rev.) 'Ll!:i"OBUdOg< .·.,i l/y~ . I .f.. ..... /~< .£Y.~ L ~artm." .ad~?/.IL . ... ....-(I yt,1~"ao.r ClfY.COt./NCIL ACTION7J'EM . Finance Director L Page 1 of 1 -' ¡~, 'L '",,- ~ ,. 1,~j,:.~tM~,\".~'V. ~~j.~~,I~~:~" ~-Hj:.i, CiB~ti~.~[!fn v 'J "11~8' 9= ,~~" I: ' :~I ,I~ T\ \ þil"f, ,¡,''c, I ".. -,! r' ' c.. _ 0,' ""- . HH I' C -, ," - _ ~.\l '/ ,.' I ,~"TI~;1 -8:1 _->J,;,è", " = ~~ i : 1 I~) I '¡llln¡ lilT "il:; l:o~ ~I· ~- ,~I"J!~¡ ~ .'~~'~-I! ~\\. ' T p;:::.jl \- I òT 1 ~ ,-' ,..,!.. _ µ"'t LJ '~';=. C-' -- ~ j1:"::: - LL.{I:'i, --.": \=; :-:1 ~~c:: _ ~ 1~2 *! ~ r:: lR 5-D C' V 57K11-O AJ':t- _ _~ r- \~A-' III I ---R-- :::-::¡:- :'t.:;"""';:'-' - ~~~ ~13I! / ~-1t"'i "- ,_ µI r-d V ,., f-C ~ ,-'2 ~ ,p';:' ~ ~.".~ . c - ./ /' -' r¡.: :-rr H! ~ n~' f=-- ~ ~ -, L o-i I, ì '- C- ~ ,. ~u 0,';.' ~'VF~¡"~~" \\ ~~\ ,_ . 'Sl ~' - '-I- C~ _ ~~lLm !Q-~~ "') ~ sJ· I(\~ ~..: ..f.~: .~.~ ~ ~ì~~ ~ \:1~.-_ ~~~~ ;::: u~Jf ,I ,'I I I ~\..- \ ~'" '\ ,\;;Ii ". :":~ 1 "",=,.J ,I n / 'L" , ,.. ,,'--. _ $~. E]S C) R~~ §"ill T;- t= h!~t~/'~-I ~-:= r ~ ~ .. --~' it ~(' ;j1 ''', 1\ al I -:- tt~.~.. çli ¡II rT'~':'~""" ~ ~ '- - - I--Jr-- ,- . If , -0 '" ~ \, ~ R-7'MF C /1 =!= _'v ~~,~. I . \ ~ " " -L_ ~.:....- .f. , "'1' PO ' -!.- ,.} L.. ~, .f .~ II,! :'T").\ .. _~ '_ -+- -- _,<7 ~ 7' III _ '.i ,r:- ~ C-2:::J-- -- C 2 C-ISU ' 0l. -+- - "" -- " '- . ~...... 1087::::" = __~ ,,0 .a., r/" ~+~' '" -ì --- ,- '~ ' ,I IT' 'T.JII"'" -¡: ,_ ,t"-' ,C'ó~ - ~.-":4-I ~j -t:¡ - T j I , -:;<¡'J -rl ~ - ,"LR S U .. ~,\, W" ..( ~ ... ^ '- ~i 1."" L ---,. I , ~ ,- '" ~ 1\)'" Co ~ ~<_ ~ ¡ l I I I , , , '''TJ rrTl' :::c ;: 5\ 0 CJ0 5,.' ff ' ~ 'T C"¡' . _ ' I " It ! I ~ -=re' ( N'::X: JR" \ """'''''' C~.J ì .."... \ (r > ,~ , f-- r --J'- 118Z--\ H' -¡- rn-= µE~ ~ J \ ,,~i S · ~š; ZI7 .\ I ! I , i' . ¡ _ ' ' ~" ' oJ. c~- ' 0' \ ! !11 T' L , ~,_ ~" "~-I to -I'~}I. 1~1I "c..'¡'T.}' 11 b\ ~- Î ¡ _, '""\.- _ ~ '- ~,-" .J. ' '1; S o"ICA'Ii J l.._ \;. 124 _..?-~ ~'-+- .. __. _ f-- --..:: C/"'''....... ~.' .U .\c -~" ~TO"'~' I ,)'{ C'2 . I -\'- -;y ~ '"F¿r:"... "'C""'4~ c;u" lfZ8S-IO(.}éo2Co1o" '! .'\~~' ,-I ".............. I c.-¡ To ~\... S u '-.J C-IS U "" ,I ,:',. C.¡.':;rc ~'\~ . "ž . " C-I Su 0.' "" gl!. .' JJ.... . -- ' "'. i., ~ 1'7 =- '= ~/ \ \ '", \ -- I o·r ....~... ---...... ¡ ~" i L '-=- =~ C-2~ ~\ \ '''J.., C-2" "~.:~:.. C-2 1"11; Ä, ~¡¡ i ~= ë:é', \ '':11.1 , ; ~I ' I TTIíTL:7;= ~ -... ' I, ~..jt:-= / " "- ~__-~"" rTln.I~Q~~ .,,,-//!---. ~\\\;~" Cool I,ll,:"'" \' , ¡----' H..P (''0'" I ~r ~ t-·.~~~, þ, PD , -,/ i . I --r- ']:f' '---!."_...... \ \ " 1 ~ ~: -~ C~I "'l'\ \ '. ;l L'r~t'r ~ ' _, V r I I ; f--l- u, ~~. CYL \ (j ,,~, c- \ ~ \Nj:: ¿' ~~'" ilt~ \FP\ -iT.--{~ i \ \ ---' ' ,L ?!= R-7-Mf' ~_ It, \ \ . \ _ ___L~ ,- ~ /, } /., ,"'~ "_, '" Il"" 'r-:::'~ ~. ~ ,0 , .' ,- I ~ - ,o~ 11°0- I.~ 0.' I ~ I ¡ (I ,~ 1 ,,0 ,v..-I. ': 'I M " ,,'...L :. ~ _ ~ ' 0 U § i ---.;: 1..-' .......;~~ I - . _'---- ~ ,~~ bJ' " ,';1 .... w. ~1'" - -..... ~_ _ . uc·ì' \ f1-¡: .~ .-- -~4 - --n ~ LR' . ~ ~ .. ~ ill" -- ,_ C-I FP R-2 ~of"'Q~~-I' FP '---- . -j ~ .' / / I / - ~ 2-21-85 . c . ~ I i c l , , j 1 I . ¡ .- _.:":e·!'! .~ I _ J..: : CAT! !, --- ~£\ ra..-.- _. ... ,. -.: ..." .... oS , ..:: ,:'.:......$ ~ 'J "<. , .- '" ... ... .'- 'i e ..ft.' '~·,I: .,- Page ï ( P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 ( PZ 85- ~VED 10. PZ 85-106 '- Chairman Bowen asked if anyone wished to speak regarding this matter. / Mack Garvin, 6908 Little "Ranch Road, came forward. __ He/~aid he had read the ordinanc~_~nd--it looks good to him. ---- / Çhairman Bowen said the individual ...;-//would need to request the zoning . change. He said the ones who are not grandfathered, may request the new zoning classification. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-105. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of World Class Motors, Ltd. to rezone Lot 5, Kips Big Boy Addition, from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos. This property is located at 7755 Northeast Loop 820. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those Wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. John R. Maddox, General Manager for World-Class Motors, came forward. He said they plan to sell fine European cars. He said they have another place in Grand Prairie on 360 and requests they be allowed to open World Class Motors, Phase 2 in North Richland Hills. Mr. Maddox showed the Commission pictures of the type of cars he plans to have. He said they desire to own and operate a retail outlet with a showroom and outside parking. Mr. Maddox said they would not take up the required parking spaces. Chairman Bowen asked if this would be a low volume dealership. Mr. Maddox said it would be, but said he has a waiting list for cars. Page 8 ( P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 ( Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Maddox if he was aware that this property will be in jeopardy when they build the new interchange. Mr. Maddox said he did, but he has a 3 year lease. He said their plans for Phase 3 is to build own their property. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one Wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-106 APPROVED 11. PZ 85-107 Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 85-106. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Winn-Dixie Texas, Inc. to rezone part of Lot 16A, Block 5, North Richland Hills Addition, from its present classification of LR (Local Retail) to LR-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at 7201 Grapevine Highway. . /" Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. ,/ " ,," /- /' //' // Buddy Ouj esky came forward. He said ",,/ they were requesting this for their building only, not the entire shopping center. Mr. Oujesky said they request they be allowed to compete with the other supermarkets in North Richland Hills. / / /' // .,,/;' Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Oujesky if he was aware the City Council would need the name of an individual for the Specific Use. / ,/ ./" Mr. Oujesky said he was aware of it. '- ~-~-_.__..._-_. --- ---. (: . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. .....,'-~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas August 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-106 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-1 TO 'C-1 SU' REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 132 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. o~ A/" ~ RI¿~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-106 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 '- ORDINANCE NO. 1288 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-106 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-1 to C-1-Sale of Used Autos. BEING Lot 5, Kips Big Boy Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-120, Page 92, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at 7755 Northeast Loop 820. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONI 1985. SEPTEMBER, ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE~CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-106 IS HEREBY REZONED C-I-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF USED AUTOS THIS 14th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1985. MAYOR ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: '- ATTORNEY ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - Department: Planning and Development . SUbject: Zoning Application 7201 Grapevine Highway Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-107 Ordinance No. 1289 at Blaney Avenue This Zoning Application is presented on the existing Winn-Dixie Food Store on the northeast corner of Grapevine Highway and Blaney Avenue. The requested rezoning is from LR Local Retail to LR SU Local Retail Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-Premises Consumption. The purpose for the rezoning request is to allow the applicants to sell package beer in conjunction with food sales at their supermarket. l RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-107. l 1 1 1 -- ì T T T T r r Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget p__ er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Rtft;t:; ead Slg~ature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director r Page 1 of 1 " Page 8 ~ P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 ( -'----..-- PZ 8s..:: 06 ~ROVED 11. PZ 85-107 - '-.. ~ // / /"" Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Maddox iLne was aware that this property wiT1 be in jeopardy when they bUild,the new interchange. _/"- ' / Mr. Maddox said/hé'did, but he has a 3 year lease.~Hé- said their plans for Phase 3 ;f.s/to build own their property. / Chsirman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one Wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 85-106. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Winn-Dixie Texas, Inc. to rezone part of Lot 16A, Block 5, North Richland Hills Addition, from its present classification of LR (Local Retail) to LR-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at 7201 Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Buddy Oujesky came forward. He said they were requesting this for their building only, not the entire shopping center. Mr. Oujesky said they request they be allowed to compete with the other supermarkets in North Richland Hills. Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Oujesky if he was aware the City Council would need the name of an individual for the Specific Use. Mr. Oujesky said he was aware of it. .'- - -- L -. .-..._..._~~_... . Page 9 ~ P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 ( Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-107 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-107. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. 12. PZ 85-108 Request of Bobby W. & Jerry A. Elliott to rezone Tract 2G2, M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from its present classification of R-3 (Single Family) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located on the north side of Harmonson Road, approximately 695 feet east of Honey Lane. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. /~.Y' Anita Snow, Residential Sales Manager for Century 21, came forward. She said this was an older community with older homes. She said there are commercial properties, a church, a trailer park close by, and a home with a life estate. Ms. Snow stated she felt no one would buy the property for residential R-3 and build 1400 square foot homes. She said North Richland Hills Furniture Company is there and another person has an office in her home. -' " ,/ //" / /' / / Ms. Snow stated there are several pieces of property on Harmonson Road being advertised for sale for over $2.00 a square foot. She said this 1~ acres backs up to Multi Family for townhouses. Ms. Snow stated this was located in the middle of an area being used for commercial. / ./ --------.-------.,.-.--- (" ,v { " ~',-- . KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ONING CASE PZ 85-107 REVIEW LETTER, LONING FROM LR TO 'LR SU' REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 149 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~UI.~ RICHAI<U . AL I , P.E. R~¡A/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '-- Zoning Review PZ 85-107 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267-3367 · . P-z.. 85--/IJ 7 ---.. LANDES &. ASSDCIATES. INC. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEVDRS 1107 E. FIRST STREET · FORT WORTH. TEXAS 78102 · (817) 870.1220· METRO 654-0590 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 0.7702 of an acre of land being a portion of Lot 16A, Block 5, North Richland Hills· Addition to the City of North Richlahd Hills as recorded in Volume 388/51, Page 89, Tarrant County Plat Records, also being a cinder block building occupied by the Winn-Dixie Supermarket.' Said 0.7702 of an acre of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a point being the most southerly corner of said Lot 16A, and also being at the intersection of the northeasterly right-of~way line of Blaney Avenue, a 60 foot wide public right-of-way, with the northwesterly right-of-way line of State Hwy. No. 121: THENCE N 48 ° 00' E, along said northwesterly right-of -way line, 40.6 feet: THENCE N 42° 00' W, leaving said northwesterly right-of-way line, 86.5 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the tract herein described: THENCE N 48° 00" E, 34.3 ~eet: THENCE S 42° 00' E, 11.0 feet: THENCE N 48° 00' E, 52.7 feet: THENCE N 42° 00' W, 11.0 feet: THENCE N 48° 00' E, 49.4 feet: THENCE N 42° 00' W, 63.8 feet; THENCE N 48° 00' E, 12.0 feet; THENCE N 42° 00' w, 79.3 feet; '- THENCE S 48° 00' W, 12.0 feet: THENCE N 42° 00' w, 63.5 feet; --.. THENCE S 48° 00' W, 162.2 feet: THENCE S 42° 00' E, 158.2 feet; -- . ". , -',,-- LANaES & ASSOCIATES, INC. REGISTEREa PUBLIC SURVEYORS 1107 E. FIRST STREET . FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 . (817) 870-1220· METRO 654-0590 THENCE N 48° 00' E, 1.4 feet: THENCE N 42° 00' W, 9.9 feet: THENCE N 48° 00' E, 24.4 feet: THENCE S 42° 00' E, 58.3 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 33552 square feet of 0.7702 of an acre of land. The property described herein was surveyed on the ground in the month of July, 1985. ? /J~ ~ . 4"1 co~ Lan es, R.PeS. 11886 "-- 185165 _ -'"'~:"..4~:~.;.;.;,..:;;"., ·."".~)~~iiJt:S<~.;~-,:/:'j·.fõ'ii.il'~¡,t<.:t:."!tiP.i!~}J,/Ñ.',}<.~'~.,;j;...:~~¡";";:n-~...~,t~-,G<..~,',¡:,;,;~.:''';'''-'';~Ó~~.""",,.!4.;~..j.~~i:.>",~-)."~,V"'~'A~-··~~_~C;"'-""c____~__~u~'--- 'Ii'I"·7·~ :+'f"-" ~,,__FI I t " I ' , Iì '~, .b..~-' ¡~ ~~i\". ~ ~y ~-t 'Or , /'". ....~. in, I ~, of~:: 89, , ) "- '.- \ -' I " !" .....~L. ~ -, ~ '"--' '-" r~ j ..... i i .. I ,'ì ..;\ \ -, ~\ L ^.! - ',.flinn-Di.xie 'Stc~e i 2107 ¡ loca':.e-d at 7201 Grapevine Highway, Lot. 16A f aloex 5 t Nort.n a~chj.and Hills Aådl tion to t.he City No:~h Richland Hills as recQcded in Voll.¿:pe 3.88-51, Page ~ðrcant County Plat Recordsl ~arcant County, Texas. " ii, ¡~ 4 . I ~ I ~ I ~ I - - y ;; ,'. .. '" '" ~ ..-( 1 i f'!; r .. . . 'j :- " ;..... .~ ;1 .~ . ~ , .~;, ~ I ..... t '1 I .. '.. / '. " ~- ... .¡ " " , , :-:. ./; ... '" ~ - .-~ :-';;~" ":':":~'- , ::?'I:<~.. /,' ~-"---.::~.----::'"'--_... .--.'. 1// ,""'¡ , ,.,/ ~ \$\' ~, ~ \~ \ ~~ 1''''- . ~ .. :.. ~;.~: 1 ,. ., - ~ '. . -'. 1 - , . , ~ -, I -¡ '.,,/ - i 4 ------ - '.... ' -' --""'--.0 I ., , , .-' : - \) >·r "- I " \ ~ ., ... ; ,. ¡/ ..-X".'- //.::p ".~". /' ',- ' / >/ .1 '. ~ t -.-.---- ~ ...........,_~ _" - io_· .- "'--, (_....-A, t""" . '-, , l' r--.....~~ , I I -~.... ! - / ....,.../., .""" -, ~ ._ ."iI, ,- -' .,' ¡ , / , , " " , ',,- e.............., .~ i .J "- /.~~ ", ./~A, ."..... "........ ':.-~- t "¡,~ r---. t~:-: --.."" ...... .:. i..,.o -- "......... '.- '~.- -. ............:- .,':: ...,. ............. - ........, ,- ~-:' ,; ~ ·--"2 ~:) . :,¿; '-'; - ;~_...:-~_. ........ e ':¡..~... Tt1f MN' t1~ W~pmMmrROM N1 ACTlW. SOIWfY 0" Tt1e LeGALLY DOCRIBfD PROPfRTY f45 SHOWN H~. ,THe utteAt1t) D1MC'I5IOt-I5 or 5AlD,~ ððNa'ftð INDICATeD m THe PlAT, ·N10 Tttf OI5TJV1œ f"~,ç~ ~~ ~~"'Rf5T 1r-rn=R5~tt(5 511".~fT OR ROAß 15 f45 SHOWN Ort SAlO PLAT. TtiER~ AP.f Me fMC~OACt1M~, PROTRUSIONS, OR APPAReNT EA5fMr:tITS. r:xCfPT 16 SHOWN. ""'¿ . '""' , ...... ..... 5CJ\l~: ~ . '-,.-', '-' --', ',-- \; . -.i.- r / "-,-- f"" c"- -~' " '- . ...... I , CEP\T¡F¡c.~ ¡ION: ..., -'" // ,f· \,?-" /, , '/~ .i.:.././7......:'J-o., k~ COY D, Lf\~O. 1\.".5. #1886 ; DATt: IN''I~ O. 1"ef\000000, I'.."-~. .19~6 L. #";:'1 I-kNC~9 So A&~":)CtJ1;es, f1\C. -~~ J'_~ . .-. - ,'- ..r1 ~.ai;:;~G"'\~ çh.í:.~= "'~·l-!S~'C S¡";;:I"',,{EYO'~9 ORDINANCE NO. 1289 - AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-107 the following described property shall be rezoned from LR to LR-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. 0.7702 of an acre of land being a portion of Lot 16A, Block 5, North Richland Hills Addition to the City of North Richland Hills as recorded in Volume 388-51, Page 89, Tarrant County Plat Records, also being a cinder block building occupied by the Winn-Dixie Supermarket. Said 0.7702 of an acre of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: - COMMENCING at a point being the most southerly corner of said Lot 16A, and also being at the intersection of the northeasterly right-of-way line of Blaney Avenue, a 60 foot wide public right-of-way, with the northwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 121; THENCE North 48 degrees 00 minutes East, along said northwesterly right-of-way line, 40.6 feet; THENCE North 42 degrees 00 minutes West, leaving said northwesterly right-of-way line, 86.5 feet to the point of beginning of the tract herein described; THENCE North 48 degrees 00 minutes East, 34.3 feet; THENCE South 42 degrees 00 minutes East, 11.0 feet; THENCE North 48 degrees 00 minutes East, 52.7 feet; THENCE North 42 degrees 00 minutes West, 11.0 feet; THENCE North 48 degrees 00 minutes East, 49.4 feet; THENCE North 42 degrees 00 minutes West, 63.8 feet; THENCE North 48 degrees 00 minutes East, 12.0 feet; THENCE North 42 degrees 00 minutes West, 79.3 feet; '- " Page 2 THENCE South 48 degrees 00 minutes West, 12.0 feet; - THENCE North 42 degrees 00 minutes West, 63.5 feet; THENCE South 48 degrees 00 minutes West, 162.2 feet; THENCE South 42 degrees 00 minutes East, 158.2 feet; THENCE North 48 degrees 00 minutes East, 1.4 feet; THENCE North 42 degrees 00 minutes West, 9.9 feet; THENCE North 48 degrees 00 minutes East, 24.4 feet; THENCE South 42 degrees 00 minutes East, 58.3 feet to the point of beginning and containing 33552 square feet or 0.7702 of an acre of land. This property is located at 7201 Grapevine Highway. APPROVED 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. - BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-107 IS HEREBY REZONED LR-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION THIS 14th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1985. MAYOR ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY '- .. ,~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: '- \.-subject: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-109 Zoning Application 8407 Grapevine highway Ordinance No. 1290 at Emerald Hills Way This Zoning Application is presented on the existing shopping center site on the northeast corner of Grapevine Highway and Harwood Road. One of the proposed uses in the center is a Bogies Restaurant. The requested rezoning is from C-l Commercial to C-l SU Commercial Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. The applicants who operate the restaurant wish to sell alcoholic drinks with their food service. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-109. l ¡ I 1 ' \ '-- l l 1 1 1 1 1 Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available ~ng.BUdg~T~) 1l-td/~ ~~....( ~{.~~~ad Signature - ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE.M ' . Finance Director 1 Page 10f 1 "- / I I ,I , , I ' ,\ \ \ \ " \ " \ ' \ \ \ ~F , \.f? , \ · [ r ñì I ' , 1-1 ' , [t11 ,."." I I , C-J t c.c.t"- ..,..,J I-I " .' ¿ & ~& :::,' ' " "'- ~ ,~ :; ~}, ~ · _..... r:-¡ ( l Ci .. ,Q-" ," .. \\1 I I ,:¡¡, I,.' ¡ lsv.r- " ' , · . I~ ~su I ~ I ./\~!' 11 , \ >-' I c-' ~- .' " ,"' I' I ' , '" _ ¡ . .. 'ff ........... ~' V'w' -0 ' - I I = . .'-;\~ " "'YT''rilFf( \ · ,=.c- 'IPO'~& T 'I '" nt: · \ ; ;;f(l;'.Æ' po' À T" " .;.;! iI "., ' ,ì 11' AG I '\ :-:.- _ T.c' II rZ '" ~\ 11.. TI F.P.~ , MF c, r::U "I . Hèi ' ~ I I ..... 1-'" "".,.' "- ' IT" ., II 1 '- I \ J .J I ' .,.. -'t't- t:-=E Di/i~li.J '- ~ _ _ Þ'Jt~ ~ ,-' '-C,r' - ,---.!!!L, -- f'+ " , ~ 0'11' ITT ¡.-., ,~ -¡.V ,I ~ F -~~fFjf~~8'J' 'T...u'e'., if: .~.~~,:/ / ~-~ J'. " .r.- ~E/" ",t::L --,.... 4., -. £ ,~t ,..---~~/ C-I :;;:L.. _ -, ~ I I R-7- ..: t" . _ -1:'~ ~_>''!c''''::~ ~,. ,,.,. R-3 ....'v / ' iF Y,v ~ ~--. E'" ...... F.p. ...Ir· I / ~ .. ,__~~\:-:: I........ ...... 'C' I I , ...... ...... \' I , :r ..."M .... ........ . \ I i " Q> . .............. I \ ' I ......,. ! ì .....: ,=~... I II I I II I " , I I ..... " ' \ ~ ...., it:-- ~ ':c '_ 17 /' 1/. . \ ï ?z1J$-/øi ' \ ã - t- ,~~/ K'r=ì y--v-A-.. ~ f- ~ \ Ii ,-, TÞ' , :-;¡':í/ S ,r- .- \ I! (;- 5¡)·' \ _ I --þ I-- -IIR 7 Jl I- '- R-7-MF \ t /1. \ = VR '- - - MF " ;:: ,'['. .( , ~,i__ :;; ",.; _. ~~ R-G-T R-G-T \::. .~ QC,,~Q I \/\\'- I ¡ ".. ~ ,,,. H- ;,' " , C· I , ::I;t - ~.--.. H ---'I Iii C - ,\ " I I-:-:--n -.." / ,'-:* ~ ~. ~ ~"" ' : H ~ ~R 5-0 %"...(1" 1/ S';þ' ~ ~'v~ ~"'l ~7,~,~~~~y£~~Jþg;· -PO ~,-~ .t-:;~o-- l , *_ ' " "'H:" ~~r J' X~\=.;"'·· "J<' -' \ (J,t;\~l ~~ II · _ ,,"~"1/' -+- ,'- ,'" .¡~" ~ C- i -..: I ' .,"",C", '-- '- f-- f-.i- -. h ~\ tyl ,::,..- I' I I JUT '~ ~ 1. 1-- L ~'- , \ 10" --- _ yo' h- .." - ., ! ' _ _ R-7-MF C /¡ ~ ~:!-,L , I , ~\/' '- ~_ ..", \ ~ I PO ': , h- -I- ." - / I ---"" ~ .' µ.. _ , :;v _ R-I I C ~....J....-j I- ;' C-ISU', rf P- 1--.. 'õ: __ l' ,i ; -I -<J." r- ,,---. c", - .r¡;~' It'" -' ....,. I' . ' "'- cj. , . C-I . ý_ _. ... , :;- , I .- ,-. ,1." ~ -'~ '"j s ~o. SU., \-' . .. _ - _C~¡ .. ,.". ,,_,'!R-'it "", '7 _ C-/- w,,- "1 .. >- i1='= .~~ ." + '-- "n,' ~, =./ ." '- .., r::z,.,if / ,f · ~~J. ~š ~ ,r ,~ ,I ..- C-1<-7 ;. I-- 1" (~ , ;> '" .'" ' " , I ",,' ., ~_ ~tle~~;~ š~Üj ~~o..'~ 1.<, ~;:~:~ ~ \ 124 kl~" c.z \ \ , -ç-j Ii - ,./ f-I¡? : C.,: ... .... C:U. t'Z8S-IO(,.'C'ZCol';) "J .17' .> 11L_ C-I ~:- C-I r. __ SU ' ~c~s u...' - - r . _ _ '-I suo , c·, ." " , ':: ,> ." suo C-IS U - ,_.' ,~ / C--I 'L · 1211.. 'J ~I ft \ ¡:?f!f~~ =!=¡-~;¡¡: , -7..1 \ r"' .~~~'~: ~__ ,~~_I ~ }.KV~~ ~ .. r-...lH' l R-21~;:\y > -2..,--, _ C - I ;;;;;;..- ~ (~I C"' R-7-MF '=1. U 7~3~· AG Ji' r I ~ :It: C-2 11411 \ \. í n A'.PORT\ '- R-3 10'0 , R-3 .. L I! '/ AG I-I su r 0' .." ,,~ ~ 'i' lJ ,,'" - ....... I-I ~ \.. AG I ~ ... .... +~ ,c. + Co U O'" y,~ (JÞ- t;~ ~+~~ ~o~ ~~ rl ~ .-J L.--I ~ - '-- Page 12 ~ P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 13. PZ 85-109 PZ 85-109 APPROVED ( Request of Bogies Restaurant to rezone part of Lot 1R, Block 1, Walkers Branch Addition, from its present classification of C-1 (Còmmercial) to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located at 8407 Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Harris Hughey, one of the owners, came forward. He said they plan a restaurant in Harwood Plaza and they need to sell beer to survive. He said they would sell the 60/40 ratio. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 85-109. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 14. PZ 85-110 '--- ~' /' ----// /// ---- ./ ./ ,-- Request of Sun Development Company, Inc. to rezone part of Tract 3,NRH Industrial Park Addition, from its present classification of 1-2 (Industrial) to R-7~MF (Multi-Family). This property,is located along IndustrialPark Blvd., east of Rufe Snow Drive, and south of the railroad. /' ,// ,r/ Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Larry Ortiz, owner, came forward. He said they bought this property about 6 months ago. He said they plan to name it Grand Central Business Park. (\ ..) - '- . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-109 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-1 TO 'C-1 SU' REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 115 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. The description of this zoning change seems to fall within R-7-MF zoning on our zoning map. ~d~~ RI HA D W. ALBIN, P.E. , RWAlra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '- Zoning Review PZ 85-109 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ORDINANCE NO. 1290 - AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-109 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-1 to C-1-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. -, The following described tract or parcel of land being a portion of Lot 1R, Block 1, Walkers Branch Addition, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas according to plat recorded on Page 1 of Volume 388-180 in the Tarrant County Plat Records and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING North 44 degrees 46 minutes East a distance of 42.03 feet and South 45 degrees 14 minutes East a distance of 32.0 feet from the most northerly Northwest corner of said Lot lR, Block 1, said Walkers Branch Addition; .. THENCE North 44 degrees 46 minutes East a distance of 45.0 feet; THENCE South 45 degrees 14 minutes East a distance of 75.0 feet; THENCE South 44 degrees 46 minutes West a distance of 45.0 feet; THENCE North 45 degrees 14 minutes West a distance of 75.0 feet to the place of beginning and containing 3375 square feet of land. "- Page 2 - This property is located at 8407 Grapevine Highway. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. ~tl~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-109 IS HEREBY REZONED C-1-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES THIS 14th DAY OF OCTOBER. - MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY -,,"-- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-112 Vubject: Zoning Application Ordinance No. 1291 North Side of Chapman Road East of Rufe Snow Drive l l l l l l -' l l 1 1 ì 1 This Zoning Application is presented on a portion of the vacant townhome property on the north side of Chapman Road east of Rufe Snow Drive. The requested rezoning is from R-6-T Townhome District to C-1 Commercial. The applicants wish to add this property to the existing commercially zoned tract to the west of the subject property which fronts on Rufe Snow Drive. Their stated plans are to construct a shopping center on the combined site. The Staff noted to the Commission that the Thoroughfare Plan for this area requires that Chapman Road be widened to a four lane Collector Street. The City is in the process of improving the street under an existing bond program and assessment program. However, this project was designed and approved prior to the adoption of the Thoroughfare Plan and as a result the construction is ,proposed to provide a 41 foot paving section which is not in compliance with the current requirements. The developer of the subject tract will be required to add additional right of way and participate in the additional construction required to bring the street in conformance with the Thoroughfare Plan. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-112. 1 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget o er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available l .~ ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM -7 .. ~ 1J1/~ City Manager . Finance Director 1 Page 1 of 1 -J,ffi: '--¡';-- I T 1 s= -======¡¡ -'1,~ I 1. ï --J ! I Ut-:l' n-, -' ~ " i - :=8 = H~í: I !l.J:tJL mTTT'ill i±lli = -" _ ,1 I d3 t;::, t:t:i'5m ï:, :¡Fir 'U:m' \ \=íJ tH ¡:: _ 'r-~' ,. ~ _ .~r:m = ~rJJnHhJf"ttL '"1\ rrttt tit, \=;::j", "',- '~I ~ R!, '~ ~ jQ' 'ÔlT !i I~-j'. , .... ~>-~ ~'-~:"II: WI~ 1~J...:.=,,-~ï1~~I:'~pr;JI~ITíìuç I~ ~¡::II 11"1 ...... hi :IuJ[.u~rTTT r- ~ ~:t= R3'Ïiii I J. ~"1 \11 ï'nTl:JB:¡ m h-m IlJ R 2 ~S~'I~'I'!II'IJ.-n\11~·~~\~~1-L7..J-t_ rlii ~, . r-", T'" ~" ~v D-l::-c11"W r:>-~ . I If II I.. ff~::-. ~q~, U' '<", ~~ "'~h-jb/~ ; n I rY ITI, . 'oIll. :::J.:: Æ 0'((",) .''--'-> '-, 2iiillffi·r. = ITDTlTI 'J.lµ i' ~~~~ III' I . . ITIIJTTm l i trr '....... H;n' 1 IJ..-<- AIL J-- IJIIIITIIJ UJ'~~ii'"~..'.: I¡î~~~.... T'¡::,' _ Æ'- ~ crn:µm: I ¡Q~~'~~~;¡'~ ;}HI-HI, 1.0;:: .......¡ :m:. I, ì J", 1 II U I LIITIIDJ ~L""" "., ~ " T r IJ " ~ TT 1'-1', ~ \.l-1 r<" 'r-v I ~ I, ,," IT ~ ~ \ ~tLÎm:I,=~ l t-1 ; IJ, f'"'" '" ,., , "'_jj . '- '-'1-:í¡JJ ~ , "'.'4-, ; _ _ .~~:' CJI. [k -<:m"-' R-7- MF ,~ _ , : >- ggwi ~~:I I \i'1\ ~ S- I. I 1_1 ~~.\"i ~:td'L i ,ª\ l' 1 R J---1- =1 -f U. ~ II J C· I I R-21 .=§', .::.. ""~H - I .." _ r- <; L.,-,' co t I~_~O _Ii h tIhiR , ..J v II u .W':'"," rTTii I", if-- ,~' _ rl rr 1 in UJ.: :..r-- _ >--- _ _ I' I f1, I . i:1 c- , R-' I _ 0- .. -"" ~ f:j _ r-"-' .. ~ ¡... "iUI·~~r-E lAG _ ~ ~+-- I I I ,"- if ~ M" 'sa i - ~. ¡" I _ AG . ~~,i.I"..'~~~rì,q--- I :::rrrr lL,,-i t-FI.(\~ '....= ·~~I H ,.,r-'T~~... :I'~ - I ~'T -- IF, '- 5t-.~, ~~ H -' r r- _ -- -.~ c-, 'i;!~;;r -. + -: tj r § lJ¡ I ft - '.~~~.. ~- .... -/n:;'" -[I j~·4~ : ~4 1 1<:1-¡-; 'I 11,7',;", IJtm#. " ~"" ~ '" mrn I Ff r¡" I . -' -Ii , II" ''''. 'oj +i'IJIIII . Y~A~ ~;.~ J "1 ~- f. ~f:\! I ?111III' " ',i I. jj:;¡!,.,. --' ~ Çf+ / ',-f::j rrt . ill· I ~ , I .~.....\ I' ?3 ¡if lTTTIfTl !J'l liLJ ¡ 11 \. I " ' ". - LR rR..I." ,., ~"f- I "" I::j' F.P. '-, JITIIIJJ:!~ - , . su I ~ ~ -- I ~ .ù ~ - I, [D>:. \ l N¡j!¡.;.,.¡ .\ 'I ;~ :j I \ " I '. ' \ .. ~ '.." -..., i=' .L..8 rc: ,I, ¡;, \ '6r~ v, "11. .~ 1 , ;: ~ . '. \L~~ ~ ~. ."-<-~ .u,L" :....'):L ~'- o. ~~' ~r- ,-' I " l1d~..!~"oill. ~ · ?i.(;)J~:::::. -'" c 'e;:::~iii:':;~ ~+ {J ,~r.c '1N::lf,ïT !±J'-.... "'~ ~ ,/1','.... > ,. . - --. H;'-mT "'-h ~,>,:, ~r Jj _ rT~ I- /.~\'-.'.;,~';::t! '~~'¡·t~~""~~~,,~CJJ'::' ~ '-;<; / "''''' v ~ I lL ~~1=' ~Æ ..,~'\ ,/'< -----~;:'G ¡~'~ .. .~, . --...+.. """ ., , 'b,. v: ~"-x . ^,,¡ _ " ,..... "."', '--. . ... .---...." ~~ .1.N~¡! .. "< ~,"""'-^;/ ,," >- 1 ~ '¡".x '~"h \ or- .. '-",'''.' '. · '" ,~! '-"'''' ~ ill ~/' ¥. 7,' -..¡ '.. - ~ ." ~" !.. --'-";c.::", >-. '''. r, :; , .L.LD '- . J: ~ .....J "'>~?',~" ---:?::~ :i.. '.~:::='':'''''''.' '~~1'ì[ ; , =: \'<i,ì;';!;¿ HiTr 'I ", . ~ "'J,\ ~. ,;:~-. =.. ., ~~"1!' -- -" I IT, 1~4J"''..:.\J...:::::j\ '. eLlL ~_ . ~~> / ~, . · .~~t---, ~ ...k-1 !I.n,; r'~""¡~=' '*- ~r- ~ . ... ' '~-, . . - ---' :. "---'. . '. c ~ "t::1. \Gt III î I I I , ... .. ,. - . '.. ... -.,.... ,',' ...;'" , . .. . . , .-S"V A;Y=. ~I.., .'. " . 'i ., ~ C-2 \ AG \ AG ~_ ~,.~:~ '. I C-211 .." \, _ ~ . ~~_. -- .. I 1116 \ F.P. \ ~ ..A c¡;'_ n \ R-7- 4? =- ~- - ~ -; R-7-MF AG ~ \ MIS - ...,---, . I 5.. - , , \ ~ ~. C--'u _ \. -'~.)--,t.~ .".,,~ ,. ".t.lf." ~ ~. ',-. ~ -{. -= -I~· . _ k' r"- r-;:: - "'>". \;...." '..j=-- c- ; c." , ~" . "'-, . ". ,,', \..} -'. ..,," a. ",- , .;" '.c.::: ::'.' .~:.~.~.:... "'{:: l '4c -I;~U' : ;~~:~~Iti ,,-:-- :::: AG [f R-2 1227 E'~I' .t~t E; l ---;o.-r.. T1 I J. ..LL. - I 1m AG R-2 I R-2 1118 ~ t= f:= = ~ ~ ~ t: - - - - = - . AG -l AG . ~ ~TD- 'R-) lec u - l - - " Page 16 ~ P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 '- PZ 85-110 DENIED 15. PZ 85-112 16. PZ 85-113 - ---..' " ( Mr. wtnger made the motion to deny Z 85-110. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion to deny carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together, but would be voted on individually. Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present classification of R-6-T (Townhouses and Garden Homes) to C-l (Commercial). This property is located on the north side of Chapman Drive, approximately 415 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present classification of R-6-T (Townhouses and Garden Homes) to C-l (Commercial). This property is located on the north side of Chapman Drive, approximately 385 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Taylor Gandy, 2501 Parkview Drive, Fort Worth, came forward. He said they received the present zoning in December from Agriculture to C-1 Commercial. Mr. Gandy said there was a 15 foot surveying error on the east side of Rufe Snow and the city needs 15 feet for the widening of Rufe Snow so that is the reason for the request for the 30 foot strip from Chapman to the end of their property line. He said they need 400 feet for a first class retail center. ~ Page 17 ~ P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 ( '-- Mr. Gandy said the other request, they have a mobil Service Station going in at the corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman and they need more area along Chapman Road for better access. He said he requests approval of these requests. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-112 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-112. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. PZ 85-113 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 85-113. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:30 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission '- () . KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas "-- August 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-112 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-6-T TO C-1 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 76 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. t{J.~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development -- Zoning Review PZ 85-112 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 '- ....., ~ ~ t:, " ,J:> "' <~ CI> ~f-< !~ J:§ 58 ~~ e ::: oS oS ::!f-< ~,;¡- iñ 1!i] "'-g õ .5 as '+-0 11=5:1 ~~ 11 " ,J:> '~"ê '5 ]0", Z CI> -.:J -õ >. ... - o ~~ ....... ::;:J :;¡u,:! :::.8 ~ cd .... ø. 00.9 Q) .510 c; Æ ë; e ...... c:: ~] ~ f-< ã5 :ë >< -w z o f ë:i! ~ Q '.. ~ o «)V ~ e ~ ~ .cCl> u.:: õÖ ~iI: iI: 8 .,!,VI ° CI> ~'; -Q,IX '=õ -5» ~ oS g ~ 1!? :¡- 0.;: c:: ... ,S! :1 t) CI> ~~ CI> ... ,51 -g CI> oS .c~ ...~ ~~ ,š... 08...:.:: æ'j'~ e co 0 e"'lX 8~õ _~ -r ë~ oS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ë: 'õ ~ ~ ~ o '8.. 0. 8 8 ~ ~ ; ~ oj ... "'f-4~ 8. 'a B .E .E ~ ~ 1! ... ] ~ ~2d u ,8.5 '§:8..1! () õ g ø:jasÞJ~ ~ as ¡:-d 8 8 8 ~ a: Bë~ ..!.. o~ ã) ã) ~ ~ o ãj<JO ~~'-~ ~ ~ ö CUC) 0", .c ~8~ "~~8"" ~ Nd1;;~ -;:: ,8. . t: t: .... '" .... '" -5 "'~~ M..-t'+ool\O"" .õa$'azzaS .....I+0oI0('1"') = 00 bO CI> B !P3 iI: CI> t g'~ oS ãj ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ ';¡ . bO~ J1 tL ~ t;; t).!!1 c: i2 §8~o~ :a:a-.:J8~ t; . <'d (-I ~ t'd (';$ «I 0 w~~~o (IJ(IJ~]~ ~... õ- 2 Z ..."~ ~;¡, t: 0e "'o~ i!fCl>"'<rê'Z õo CI> 0 1! 'S e ö- õ co Ž - .'IIt" S=!~.... d Oln......-:z] ~ ; g !f';: 0 ~ ~ 0\ - ~ co ,!ií 'a; iš .. <r 0 00 ~ .... VI-.:JZ,J:>C).EVlVlZCQO W (IJ W WW(IJ U U U uuu z z z zzz W W (IJ www :c :c :c :c:c:c f-< f-< f-< f-<f-<f-< 'r- ~ I \ I LLJ " "') r..¡ L-,_ --- _..J , r' \.~) «j() Or; 0(( 4,.4: " \ ~..!\ , I- , t;:¡~ ...J \ 3~ \ , \. \ 3 () ~,'II":--:.. \ ~ rJ' -z_ ~.- __'\,/" :1: p2- 0-0 <J 1-Y/~ 'Â F5-11~ '\ ~ ~,,\J ': \- to I ¡I:. .--;;r-!-", .. \ jr-:).;.... :..:>. l.U ;, '. ?1;;, \ :" 'j ~J,} " .. {j.~ --J \'v'v \>- -9t-JII-J;JCJlf"1 ';;¡..L'7 ;l2JnlP..d ,c" 'J.¡Nc;.-;I . ÎI..l[1/'Q~ ;1'¡¡n.l(\,, ,., \ ;;;1"W1 '-'9~::n;¡¡ I c,,~ l- I-- I l- I I:\~ t;:¡"" l- I-- ~{\ \ J I \)~ \}~ ...J ...J -! , -! _L ";¡~b-Þ 1°1.0.0-'" t~~) ("\ ,~ '" ' lilt ~ . «~ ~~ t<'-..r ""'I:"- ~ ~ \)~ ~ ~ ,(\ t _ I ' () l,;r C! ~ ' N ~ ~1 "¢ , r':l ~ - , (' z:. 't -~ I .. ~ ~ -- l0.om.;. ~ 'f'1I1"'1>,OI"oO'N JpNltJ¡..JI-9~<i3 ,dt::7 11,..I~d ~ ~ ..- \ ) 1- Ln I- ...,'" In '- 1:\ (, IJ u.J -!.. '" ul I\f\ __J LU II- <{ '" __J '" " --..,. < --> 1:\ OO'9Iþ ~ '';;1I1'''lZI~v"b¡;>'ý ..L"J~A-;¡?µ3~vJ07 ,Jo .Lf-Jld" - - C["1'o':;;Iosn '¿cj f1oNt;.--;I;:In2! -to u ... ~.g I ~ >- ;:: U ~ ;; -< a: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~ Z2 ~ . r It il c . ~(IJ ~ ~ ~~ = tl:J ~~ ~ ~ ~~ IJ /;- -:I ~ I/. ~ ,£ t w ~ I--- -0 ~ :::J I tù L'_ ~ 1--- u ~ T. « L tL <I.. "I \J ORDINANCE NO. 1291 \.- AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE /11080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-112 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-6-T to C-l. BEING a tract of land situated in the William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010 in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the north right-of-way of Chapman Drive (a 58-foot R.O.W.) and the east right-of-way of Rufe Snow Drive (an 80-foot R.O.W.); THENCE South 89 degrees 48 minutes 26 seconds East along the north right-of-way of Chapman Drive a distance of 415.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 5.00 feet to a point, said point being the point of beginning for corner; THENCE continuing North 00 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 320.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 44 degrees 59 minutes 38 seconds East a distance of 212.82 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 170.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 48 minutes 26 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 36,749 square feet or 0.8436 acres of land, more or less. · , , . Page 2 '- This property is located on the north side of Chapman Drive, approximately 415 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. ~æ~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~þ. t' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-112 IS HEREBY REZONED C-l THIS 14th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY ·. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PZ 85-113 Subject: Zoning Application North Side of Chapman Road Ordinance No. 1292 East of Rufe Snow Drive l l l This Zoning Application is presented on a vacant strip of property located on the north side of Chapman Road approximately 385 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. The requested rezoning is from R-6-T Townhome to C-l Commercial. The subject property is a 30 foot wide strip of land running north and south the entire length of the adjacent commercial tract. The purpose for the proposed rezoning is to realign the zoning pattern on the property to allow for the development of a proposed shopping center on the commercial tract. The applicant states the additional dedication right of way along Rufe Snow Drive which is required by the Thoroughfare Plan will reduce the depth of the commercial tract beyond an acceptable level for his proposed use. The proposed rezoning will retrieve the needed depth after the right of way is deducted. In addition the development of this tract will also require additional dedication of right of way for Chapman Road as stated in PZ 85~112 and the pavement will need to be widened to 48 feet. 1 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application 85-113 be approved. l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Finance Review ~ -' i J Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~- . . ~ Pj1/~ Departm t Head Signature ' City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM - Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director ~ Page 1 of 1 ç6t:§æ~r<~¡I\U±tl: bTTI _~'~'---¡';-II ~-rTTi. ' 'I' '. i f=1~·1 .;' ii~ i' ,1 ! ..~. "",; T ¡:~ ;:'-~ _~I=~I\\ \11\ ir' -:L i~: >--: : p:L1TrT1 T..... r- ~ :"ótiEEEB" , , i . .-I ,-' I JL;-,;-t., " ,.,!' , ~- ~illiÎ t:>-.~I-""":: ¡; I _ urr~' ;.::: -~ ': I , I: ~\ ...¡:::'\+mu I->-t" . II : 1l.(ß,"'i J ì _ -L J 'I II, i i í """"\ . .. ".-..-TC I -r ¡'J I Iii; \ \ i-' í._bJi¡-; \.1/ -. f...4J...Li - ' C - J ~ ~ ~T =~I 11\ ,..L.'~ J--- ~ J Q£:J. 1- ~=~_L', II, .1-! \ïH\ Ir-- \Ti I. ~.gyJlI[[JlJ ¡ll '!' \\¡ ~í'¡i> n III 5If--- '..d . ~~ ¡~tH\ì· I¡t:::r-\\J..\IIIII:- 1tt±8mE' '-\ \ -\, lJ \\.~>.- - _ ~ \ '(~>(\ ~·2 _ . \., ~1.-,r .u--m I~ >.. V;v"~ >-. 1132 , OJIfTTTTl p~ \......¡..¡,.-r ¡,;\ I I ,<. " arr2m II ~ T\ \ \J ,.....0: ul -r ~ -- "" >:;:< \.' r(W> '~}-t:'-r- a h\'~~i+n \ ï I, . ^ ~ '-'- 0'C .~ 1. tHttfHE + I~ YíTI.DJ. \ ~[fí I I ,...---~ ~ I 1111'\ I ¡I' rr -, .- ì Ii.. ~ r;r..... :LJ....: . --L. -:::: I I II! ' ' I \' ~ '. .. \, '- ¡; i 1m' ,I'" I ' l= ~w.. L.J II \ \ 1I1W- ,-; ~ ~,~ - H H - J -"'T1 i.--:tP' tt!IJ - , I I I I dl~'~~.'~Li jl C.~·7-MF ~..;:t~¡:.~ , 8fIæ~ E;~ F _ "'."'I'~C. ,. I __ ~ 1 [ If-;-- I I ; f- , f- ó\- 1.., _ :~r.I~~Ë: ,;¡.... ~Þ\ r, c""l. ' Ç:: t: 4~~:-:~':'M I- D r-·~~1. I.. :' ~.~ '*'~. ....... -- , L~"~:'(\i,;fTJR -~'I~~ ~ ',-3;' , ~ t>. 'V'I t(-~=!:: - ~~~~~ ~~.r~~K - ~~;\-/~ '-p L - ft1~P¡8S.tl2 ,- ~?~_-~ C-2 /I.~~'T - I ,-\- UTI _ .- , :-kY.st::s.:~y-c:..1- 1?4-,' C.'I ~ / T I- c::r-=: r- V. LR~ ;¡q;~I~1-::::J ~_ I -.J I ' .. ¡ ,T~ ,....~.., I"'" ~--+ -"" \"{. SU~ ~ ' 1 I 1-1 '- ~I I " ,...·c',::1. ~ I ¡ I Ii ~:.-I_~;- ~"'U .. c- ;:: = L I I IT- J-.J ,J ;-.\ :" I IT, II i I II II lU-lli -ê f (.. t~ i= t::;::¡ I T I ~ J. 1- -t=' I Z II! I ,IT iT ,Tl ffiffi /~";""l' ~),,' '1'1 I- II I LìO"" .....~~~'-'\ F.P. íN ø¡il..lìl.lll~I:,~I"i, ~ <Y ~ LJ.J."'_ _, I I I j::/ ~ í.' I ~, L ¡¿J i I \ t+ ~r:== \ ~ II II I,! i ~,I." '\ '7') \' \ / . .- ;0,.' .,' ~pa .! \ . ' / "~,, ~ 1 ,', I \=-=:; I i ~'1::-1 q,Jl,·"'::::' /6},i¡, -j, III! i II II 1HTT' ' , ';- ~ 0¡ J.- ..~,~tc-= \,;- -::. ......-¡ ~·I-~~!fiT IrD {1 t' ,t:::!- ~.t:::: >- J-....j....', / =1 = V /../1111 II 1:1 1, I 'II ~.('i-7l1::-{ ~\f.0J-i ' ~~~! I j LLl!¡llj I n I iËtï'~~ t::I I I -;:{.~' II, I ", I I II rNJ. I í ::r ",.r-t...:-..." i~'.\ì~ ' /': ~""" .. ' ~J~J-- I !"-.J.¡ 1(;\011 'T"'>f: ~ 0 ì \~ _--:- i ~ .~'~WI __I'"" { /,v-'~- .....,- ~ '..' (, _ __~_ ,-----,' /~~: r-: ' 1)0.::; , /, '?JJ ~¡ II I<.'-D'I ~' , ?:'--'~ :~:~ _ r--;~ ',,^ ;:JJ . vr II I r~/ T' ,c.l- "".- bo'\ // 'LLlJ L" I .Lf"- l' , Ií0. v: II I- ¡ 'I~~ í, \ \'<':.'~~\ ';ç., ',~ *_1 ~~:. :\:.~:,fXlJ í§J."~!t--J~ .f:::. '< .,' ~ ' Æ.t. ~~~ II - "; ..c _.~-..~~ ~" ,,~_.t:J~. I\SU' i ~ I 1¡,'-"I/' ~'...." y~ II ¡,mil (_~ ' . .. ~ 4 !îï1 '--' I ;-...... ....:¡ :x :r '~:_ : _~ /~l...LJ.,I~ \" I : I n 1,..,....1 " ,~.........."t. 'I-t, 'II '-~'~--' ~ _0:--= ~u. ~1- .;.....,\: ì, i I \."-.J~c\r¡.\~~ I .[Ll. II i-I \ '¿~~/!-I1::::Ir-. 1T h 1 ' %~r -::..=.lJ.-- ~ ~'. -;.\:\ I I '_"~"'::~li!lïr'lfí:rT:li=1 \'/ì~~T II I Ilfr,"', ~.?/ 1 U. C-2 C-2 I \ I ..~:~ 1176 1176 \, ~ . "'t::..:::r, \ AG \ AG - C+SlJ" ..~. R-7-MF AG \ F.P. \ ; ~"" .-dØ1\0~~~-~ - ~c-,-su..~l Vf/f '1'. " ~I .~ ~ ~~ ~--:y~ ~,~<t;\<.þ ~~:'= "v V ' . '. '" ~.,- ~",' ~ -o' .....:¡.__ '.. \0 .'~ ;)":.-'\'.J~-~ -. ...~ \' . ~.. 1- ;Ø!J ~..... ~ .. ...... '-\y "-- --....::;:,... '. . -::::::?" ..-~- ~., :_).-, . ,..-. .'tD1 - ...-- -=-... .... . _.._.... _........---- ...r:. . __::: AG f--."f-- - ---q~: . .~ ~' ~: \' )". .. II II;: R-2 1227 ~ AG -!.. = ;:= .-- I=: = = ~ ~ .,= t:: ~ - ~ - R-2 1171 AG ..."f¡';¡ " , ,," c; R-2 1111 R-2 r 1125 L...- AG - c- ; ....QO V ~I 'R-) ISC t;:1¡ II L >-~ AG Hili L J- _ ! f- ~ ~~ i- i- . >-~ i- I- i-. --; >-: - R-' I-- I-- ,~ c' (jl" I ,,~ .~ I" C- 1166 1US'/J ".,,-1 T' C.-L H-6-T 1167 ~ . F AG - - - ..-- - .-- - - u · l... Page 16 ( P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 '~ PZ 85-110 DENIED --- 15. PZ 85-112 16. PZ 85-113 --- ( M~~i~gèr made the motion to deny -----PZ 85-110. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion to deny carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together, but would be voted on individually. Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present classification of R-6-T (Townhouses and Garden Homes) to C-l (Commercial). This property is located on the north side of Chapman Drive, approximately 415 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present classification of R-6-T (Townhouses and Garden Homes) to C-1 (Commercial). This property is located on the north side of Chapman Drive, approximately 385 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to sp~ak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Taylor Gandy, 2501 Parkview Drive, Fort Worth, came forward. He said they received the present zoning in December from Agriculture to C-l Commercial. Mr. Gandy said there was a 15 foot surveying error on the east side of Rufe Snow and the city needs 15 feet for the widening of Rufe Snow so that is the reason for the request for the 30 foot strip from Chapman to the end of their property line. He said they need 400 feet for a first class retail center. ... .. <' '. Page 17 P & Z Minutes September 12, 1985 ( ( Mr. Gandy said the other request, they have a mobil Service Station going in at the corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman and they need more area along Chapman Road for better access. He said he requests approval of these requests. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-112 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-112. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. PZ 85-113 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 85-113. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:30 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission , ( {- . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-113 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-6-T TO C-1 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 76 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~ø~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoni ng Rev i ew PZ 85-113 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 -' l" . -'. õ ... o ... ó Z ,~ = II U" I!! ~ j~ <.- .ll >. !,! " II) . ~ Š :II-< e~ ;lg ¡u .8~ :5 '-1-< 1.. 00= !I'- iii oo::C _ '·1..2 ]:5] .- ~ '(jD::..., u1!J .0·:: :::z ~ td... II) 0"" :1t>.>- 'ii'~~ IOU:! II)(J ..c-- wt: .5 So I:: 10 s: ~ Z ,0 ~ .~ 8 :;¡... ei j:;¡ u~ 'õ .~ ~c ~ - ..!oS 'T'1 ~.! -:;;. "Ë'õ 8~ J~ :l .¡! II II .š1 .8-:- 0'31: ~ó .r: g õ 0... e I e~ 8~~ ¡j !!~ ~ ;5~ i5 II) (J ã ¡ :a II) (J i 0' ãc: c:: ....c toIM ~ G1 '-8. .!!1 0:- 8c "t:I('W') ~ õ"'O cd ~ II) c; (J ';¡ t:' ai'a .~ -... iñ 4).::""1 o 0'0 ·e..~ c::~1:oQc: c:: ·õ...,.... u c 0 II! 0.,5 8. c; oj (J !II a. oj8.oj....å.]l! l!(:jEojEil! .. U~ 0' E w.;::U~ 0 'õZ.!!w$C'õz~ ~~~.!!....;~~~ q ~ ~ 8 ~ 5.q ~ ] D::tl.,::¡ó;;::l!D:: _ ..co .......u..ctl.,... ~ 'S~............woo 8!Z 00°01-<1/1 lIõg88~:~~ ..c~tdãcó..c~oj .., t:! to!' II . w 0 ..c J :6 .~ .!I D::..c 11)..... .~.... "'0 -0 ..d .~ -s & - 0 oj oj oj 1::;a . ........... 0 00 ~ t}~(:ù"'tIrC:tIr: õ = Q):: =]=~.., $)......0\~0\....\C......C1) ..... ""1:''''' ..... II) õo8õ....õgõoo... :"",';t'!'r :"~ ~ $~8$8.š~",,~ Z'õZZenJ!en'õ go w¡,;¡¡,;¡ ¡,;¡ uuu u ~~~ ~ :x::x::x: :x: 1-<1-<1-< I-< r-...... \ ) .....-.... .,-' (',> --, ..-' \ , It' \ , « \ '.......J/ L\._ ..rr -z: T. ~ ) I~ IL luJ \J L > ~ "t. I ~ ^ ~ D "3. 'i: () "£ -:1. I Ii ~ C\ -~ 'L T. \I:¡ ::~:L~ J ~ . ~ "",.g.-_. I _ (T1'o';¡,17-;') 3^I'2IQ + f z.. 86 -II ~ IOO~'" ,;;;¡ ,t?)<;"<£c,,.biii -N , I \.:.,..~ 'y.--...." \ C-, ,~~ '\ ('c\ \" '--í f~ ( -{' If'" \r ~ .....y' r I \ \ \..-,,> ',- ì /, :z \r "it \'¡ . ~ I \J ~ ~ ÞI\L \I . C{Z ~- t$ \) ~ tC' \J " \J~ \,.:. L I{I \T ,w IÙ -z: '" '!:. ~ .J \Ù -r ~~~1; I'~ I!f .J- \\I I- \Ù II,) \Ù J\ ~ CI ~ \\01 'Z: ~ $ \L.. ëi /\ .J \IJ IÙ \J ":J ~ ~ t- 1O~t;-r -~ ~ ~ ï"V?2IØV..¡"~·t-J _ NVVJ~'Vl-r7 0: ~ 'tJ ~ {:'> IU (J \ I _"<t "-.t..- ~ ':;:.-- - ) .. .....r ~ \...,,, \J " (\ .--1" ,t...... ......1' þ...../ ^ Ll_ i~ ~ 1:\ Woe( ... \- cQ "'J: )( uJ ~..... /< L..I.._ u ~ Z <J :g ';.f5! r¡¡¡ >- .. j ~ ; ~ . ~ ~ <J w ¡;¡.- a: .... """- UJ :5 Z ~ "? o ~ ~~ ~ xii! ", . w.... "'" z'" Z <J -< _ a: (;;::í ... w "-.... ...¡<- rn a:.... ~ w ~~ ~ \U II... II \ ''\ ,.' : . ..-: '., ...... ' '. ,",', .. _....." '\ ~ ..--, _\ ..... -~ ..-..., .- L...;> ...... ¡OOI::7Ý-... . '3 u>?2,Øv "L.~ 'c;,. ~> .'"-!' . ORDINANCE NO. 1292 "- AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-113 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-6-T to C-l. BEING a tract of land situated in the William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the north right-of-way of Chapman Drive (a 58-foot R.O.W.) and east right-of-way of Rufe Snow Drive (an 80-foot R.O.W.); --- THENCE North 89 degrees 48 minutes 26 seconds West, with the north R.O.W. of Chapman Drive a distance of 385.00 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 1309.95 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 53 minutes 36 secoñds East, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 1310.08 feet to a point, said point being on the north R.O.W. of Chapman Drive for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 48 minutes 26 seconds East, with the north R.O.W. of Chapman Drive a distance of 30.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 39,301 square feet or 0.9020 acres of land, more or less. '- · ...' ~ Page 2 "-- This property is located on the north side of Chapman Drive, approximately 385 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1985. ~æ~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~~-;¿Q ~ ~ SECRET PLANNIN<f- M¡~:;;;;:~;~.USS ION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-113 IS HEREBY REZONED C-1 THIS 14th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1985. ~- MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY "-- .. ¥', r '.. CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS ! T j Department: ~ubJect: ~ ! I r r ! r Planning and Develø,.nt 10/14/85 Council Meeting Date: Block 6. Meadow La}tes Addition Agenda Number: PS 85-58 Plat Application This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Block 6. Meadow Lakes Addition. This property is an existing residential subdivision under c.onstruction on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive at the intersection of RufeSnow Drive. The purpose for the proposed replat is to realign the.lot lines on the plat· to correspond with the actual construction accomplishedou the sUe. . Apparently an error was made in the initial staking of the lots and the applicant is making the correctièmin the plat to compensate and show actual lot dimens;1ons'as they exist on the ground. The proposed lot changes will continue to conform to the minimwnlotcriteria for the R-l Single Family Residential Zone. ' Since the City's original .pprovalpf the plat for, this property the Thoroughfare Plan for the City has been off1.cJi.a.l"yado,ted. In the PlanRufeSa_Drive has been classified as a five lane adivi4ed Kãjor Collector Streat. . This classification requires r that the ultimate right of way for the street be 80 feet in.,,:td,t.h.W1u~n this plat was ' originally approved no adcU.tionaletreet dedication....ås;required. Iti the City Council's , deliberations at its last tieøtingitTlSs determined~hât~he applicant would not be ~ required to provide additional dedicat~.on on the cUIF'r.ntplat.However, the City Council I did determine that the plat should . provide a 3S foòt.building set-back line on the Rufe I Snow frontage lots in order tøprotect the future restdencesto be constructed on the r.. lots from the encroachment of '. th. .e.·... ne. e.ded right of W. aYi.n th.· efuture. The applicant has agreed with this stipulation and has made the necessary revisions to his plat. -RECOMMENDATION: The Pla~n1ng and <Zoning Commission approved the Replat Application on Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addttiotl as subtdtted. L I \ L. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) , Ope g Budget er FInance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds AvaHable I L tJt/~ ad Signature .. " City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM· . Finance Director Page 1 of-1-_ R-3 1-2 R-7-MF C-2 C-2 1164 = r , -'-...- - Page 2 ( P IS, Z Minutes September 12, 1985 3. PS 85-58 PS 85-58 APPROVED 4. PS 85-59 PS 85-59 APPRQVlm [ Request of Johnston & Son Construction Inc. for replat of Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-58. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Stanley M. Peskind and Lawrence R. Bnrk for preliminary plat // of Lot 2, Block 2, and Block 3, Tapp Addition. ~/ /..... '" John Burgess with Carter and Burgess, Inc. came forward. Chairman Bowen asked about the small piece of land at the~southeast corner of this property that was separated from this property by the TESCO transmission line. He said he requests theý plat this property or give it _to the city for street right of way.' /" Mr( Burgess stated that had been ~iscussed for a right turn, but it is ~ in limbo at present. He said they had ~ thought about putting a sign on it. ~ Chairman Bowen said it was not shown as part of this plat. Mr. Burgess stated that was an oVersight and would be corrected. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-59 Subject to the Engineer's comments and subject to the owner granting to the city the SOutheast corner of his property which is cut off by the TESCO transmission line. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. -- --------- ( r. '-.. ,- . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas Ãugust 12, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the fOllowing comments: Re: 3-912, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~EADOW LAKES ADDITION, BLOCK 6, RE P LA T , PS 85 - 58, GRID MAP 120 1 The scale of the plat should be noted. 2 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Drdinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the CitY-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Oeveloper or OWner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requjrements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. &~,tç1.~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '- 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ,7 Department: Planning and DeVelopment CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 \',.,4Ubject: 1 This Final Plat application is preSented for consideration of Lots 6, Block 9, Richland Heights Addition. The property involved is a commsrcial tract located on the northeast corner of Glenview Drive and Booth Calloway Road. The pnrpose for the proposed plat is to identify the previously nnplatted tract of land. The lot currently has an existing service station convenience store on site. The applicants propose to remove the eXisting structure and construct an updatsd convenience store on the lot. P l~ t A,pp lica t iOt¡ Lo t 6. Block 9 Ric hland Hd.h ts AddAAgenda Number: 10/14/85 Council Meeting Date: PS 85-61 ì T In the Preliminary Plat consideration it was noted by the Engineer that the lot is located within the flood plain of Calloway Branch. However, it was also noted that the location of this property in relation to the channel of the creek make it Possihle for this lot to be bUilt upon by raising the bUilding pad out of the flood hazard in compliance with the Flood Plain Ordinance and the Subdivision Ordinance. The applicant has complied with those reqnirements by providing a finish floor elevstion for the proposed bUilding on the face of the plat. T T In the reCently adopted Thoroughfare Plan Glenview Drive is classified as a five lane Minor Arterial Street. Thia atreet classification requires a total right of way dedication of 80 feet. The prOposed plat indicates an existing right of way on Glenview Drive of 56 feet and does not propose any additional dedication. Also the Thoroughfare Plan classifies Booth Calloway Road as a fonr lane Collector Street requiring a total right of way of 68 feet. The plat indicates a "future" right of way of 70 feet to be acquired from the adjacent undeveloped property on the opposite side of the street. This right of way status does not correspond with the recently constructed improvements to '- Booth Calloway Road. The Commission requested the applicants Engineer correct the plat T to reflect the correct existing right of way as it relates to the requirements of the Thoroughfare Plan prior to the plat's being submitted to the City Conncil. T T T RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Final Plat of Lot 6, Block 9, Richland Heights Addition with the stipulation thst the right of way of Booth Calloway Road be corrected. r r = Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.), Ope . g BUdget er - Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available - li~ Head Signature , City anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I .lln " ~ '" ~ '" '" ~ tJ !? " " " ~ · · ~ i ::; · I L I R'=Tl 51!' I R-2 j 5' I R-3 r f I R-4-sol Lft.2::r ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS SEPTEMBER 26, 1985 - 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members The meeting was called tb order by th~/ Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7: 30 P. M./- . / Dq.n/13owen ohn Schwinger Mark Wood Marjorie Nash Joe Hallford Richard Royston Wanda Calvert CALL TO ORDER Dir. PIa ng & Dev. P & Z oordinator CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 22, 1985 Nash made the motion to approve minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Schwinger and Mr. Wood abstaining since the were not present at the meeting. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 3-0 with Ms. Nash and Mr. Hallford abstaining since they were not present at the meeting. 1. PS 85-61 Request of J-Mc Oil Company for final plat of Lot 6, Block 9, Richland Heights Addition. Delbert Stembridge with Stembridge and Associates came forward. Chairman Bowen asked why the plat showed a future 70 foot right-of-way on Booth Calloway Road with all the right-of-way on the west side of Booth Calloway Road. Mr. Stembridge said he was not sure. Mr. Royston said the street has 45 feet of pavement but he was not sure of the right-of-way. He said the word "future" is misleading. Page 2 ( P & Z Minutes September 26, 1985 ~ PS 85-61 APPROVED ( Mr. Stembridge said he will check it out and get back with Mr. Royston as Soon as possible. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-61 subject to the engineer's comments and the resolution of the right-of-way. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. 2. PS 85-62 , .'"- Request of Roger & Joan Hanson for replat of Lots 20R-22R, Block 4, and Lots 1-9, Block 5, Nob Hill Addition. " /' " ../ Mr. Stembridge with Stembridge and ' Associates came forward. He said he had received the City Engineer's comments and have complied with them. , // Chairman Bowen asked iF'they were trying to save the ~xisting structure on Hyde street// Mr. Stembridgè stated they were. / Chairma~'Bowen asked which way the house/faced. He said there were some of~set building lines. Mr. Stembridge said the house faced north. He said this is a replat and he took the cuI de sac out at the City Staff's request. Chairman Bowen said he was aware that they needed the access, but he personally does not like the off-set building lines. Mr. Wood said he had rather have the cuI de sac. Mr. Wood made the motion to postpone PS 85-62. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. ¡ L r~ CQ , ~ ; ~ Stembridge & Associates, Inc. , " Consulting Engineers , September 17, , "--I... ; " "!'1 .~Planning' &Zoi1IngCommission ,City of North Richland Hills ,1301 N.E. Loop.820 'North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 .' . :.' --",'; .'. , ""':,:1 j , I. . .',".' . ,'. ,<.:,,'~'~' ;;.(:;,,_<,.~..~c,,(.,~ .,~.;::~\T',:~:·>:>l\í'ïi::",II>:.<, ,;':-:'.~.:'~ I:"! ".: _ .=, .,' '. ::';RE: 'Lòt' 6, Blodt9 ,RICHLAND HEIGHTS h , Fi na 1 PI at. P S 8 ~,~ 61 "0' '",,\,.,;,1',:'~ "'w', "i.,:" :~î~(,~~;~á~W~;(¡> In response to Knowl ton-English-Flowers l Inc. ',' le'tter dated ':'..¡,::<{:;~~~>' 1985, follow1ng comments :,:','t.¡ ~,.;,..u ,L:'! \~~I':: .j ..".' "'" "':, .::rit';~~\rft~!f~~1·1j·¡:;:}"·l1J~~;~~~Îjf,1t!'f!' The' Owner is"aware that he is responsible 'for 'all pr·ovisioris'~·.i<;!i of the Subdivision Ordinance; Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other icabl Ci 1-, ,'opmentCodes. Sincerely, ; : ' ~ . ! ¡ , i , ' , . ~ I , . < " I , ! 1 ~~.E. j' ( , ~ .\" .I,;, ,I ,~ "J ,'~ . ..'t ~, Rodger N. Line, City Manager " Gene Riddle, .Director of Public Wo rks Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Richard Royston, Director of Development - --------, -'.; ',--- -'; l. q - " -",,' , t.c', , :, ~. " , :~~s " .. .::,¡~?j·:'·:-ii:~ , .;;(;~~"~~~~~:f;f " : <'.. . ' ..' . - , , ')~;A'::;';J'~I'" ./ ":'.,:;< ,'.,. 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817)284-1363 '.~:P;~' :.< ~ -, :',:;~?,,~ .-': "~"" -. '.''': '.'- ' , , . ,. .':10(1'«, ,.; .~;':-"',·~'f.rl:· '-, ~'h'-4~';; ...~?,"\4;ø ~__.~~~...,., 1>2i'~~w~";;"'kt""~""'~¡QIifÏÎl1¡M;~ . ' '; "fj{d'.';,~);;~ .~ .1'",. ,,' ,.., ;,,0t~~'.(£ ( ( . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas ',--, September 10, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-825, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RICHLAND HEIGHTS ADDITION, LOT 6 BLOCK 9, FINAL PLAT, PS 85 - 61, GRID MAP 150 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 All suggested additions and corrections have been made in accordance with our letter dated May 2, 1985, and we have no further objections to this proposed development. 2 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. ' Ple~;:;;: ëíZ0nso RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA Ira Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ',--, 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367 -~_.._. , .-- ~':"-~'-~"---'''- , , .( ( , -~. KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 2, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-825, CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS RICHlAND HEIGHTS, lOT 5 BLOCK 9 PRELIMINARY PLAT, PS 85 - 27, GRID MAP 150 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The Flood Insurance Rate Maps show that a portion of this property is located within the 100-year flood way and all of the property is within the 100-year flood plain (See attached Map). Based on the plat submitted by the Developer, detailed field surveys show that the existing building structure and part of the area around the building is actually above the 100-year flood plain. Our surveys performed in connection with the Drainage Master Plan Report confirm that the existing building F.F. is above the 100-year flood plain. We would not object to improvements on this property if the new construction is located outside the floodway and the new finished floor elevations are at least 1.5 feet above the existing flood plain. (Minimum F.F. should be at least 558.90). We would note that if future improvements are made to the Glenview Drive box culvert and concrete channel liner construction is performed on Calloway Branch from Glenview to Booth Calloway Drive, then this property will be completely removed from the 100-year flood plain. The estimated cost of these improvements totals $560,000. Prorata will be required on existing water and sewer lines which front on this property unless tap fees have already been paid. The existing R. O. W. of Glenview Dr. and Booth-Calloway Rd. should be noted on the plat. Building setback lines should be provided on both Booth-Calloway Rd. and Glenview Dr. -2 3 4 5 We would note that fire hydrant coverage protection has not been shown for this lot based on the 300 foot radius requirement for commercial zoning. As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed 6 ',-- !S!SO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG_. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. BI7/283-6211. METR0/267-3367 '~'_4 ,,"' ............ _~_ . . .G Subdivision Review Letter continued f' RICHLAND HEIGHTS upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulato~ codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~t4dW,~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development '''--.. May 2, 1985 PS 85 - 27 PAGE 2 t J - 1&,.' 1) . (/) -...;; 0 ~' ) X ZO )I&J<.:J .) ¡ . U. J~ -~ZO ·~OUJ . _N · ""d) ~~ 'C STA, 155 +·OCl -- \2 \ '\ .I I '-- I ¡,..., h I / / I / I / / I , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS L- ¡ Department: i '- \,_.-/Jbject: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PS 85-63 Plat Application Lots 12-21, Block 1, f L Nob Hill Addition í ! '- This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 12 through 21, Block 1, Nob Hill Addition. The property is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road north of the existing Nob Hill Subdivision. The purpose for the proposed plat is to create additional single family lots to add to the existing approved subdivision. '- In the Engineer's review letter three areas were noted for the Commission's consideration: I ¡ I..... (1) The proposed extension of Nob Hill Drive adjacent to the proposed Lots 17 through 21 is not located totally on the applicant's property. To complete the street to the required width will require that the applicant secure right of way dedication from the adjacent property owner to the north. Without the additional dedication the complete street paving section could not be constructed. In order to by-pass this issue for the present the applicant is proposing to combine Lots 18 through 21 into a single lot and return at a later date with a further replat when the negotiations are completed for the additional right of way. L '- (2) Lots 14, 15, and 16 are shown with an extremely large front building set-back line. This is proposed in order to comply with the Ordinance requirement that the minimum width of the lot should be 70 feet, measured at the building line. The proposed 45 foot set-back will provide the minimum frontage required by the Ordinance. - (3) Lot 17, as proposed on the plat, is shown with a 15 foot side street building line. The dimension is required to be a minimum of 20 feet in the R-2 District. The applicant requested that the Commission give special consideration to this deviation due to the extremely rugged topography of the property involved. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the replat of Lots 12 through 18, Block 1, Nob Hill Addition with the stipulation that the side building line on Lot 17 be increased to 20 feet. ~ t I I r I Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Þ($t:.:: . Finance Director r ad Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 ~ ---:11 (r-- LI I.;, ~\ \ ,. -H~:r~ .~ ~ -~éV\ ~ _~-T\ &~ 21~.~. ~?? '"v~ ?2Y.r;-9 ! 4, '1:- . ~ø'- ,~+. ~- 1<:;-- ~r~ íìTi:'I"ÎII/jL < /%~~~~~t , '/~'~~ ~t,-" R-2 ,A':-ð/;<? ~~ ri 1 1 n "" .~~£ 0-' ¿ ~. 0>=-'"-:.... '¡"'.q - .. 1188 -~ÿ'/ ...ç;~hr~@ . ~: AG ?;i~, ~r, t";' ___ - ~. , l~~ ¡;:¡;¡,' _ .<.1 _. '.>¡~.ok' " ./, · ,,\', I - ~ ~ r~ "'.M' AG ff-L~___ \ ir-R_I.5'~·Jo~II.I-~:.o~_~~21 ,~ I PSfS'''~ '~ cc:r: - J' ~~", .., .j)' '''''=--, 11""- '~\ ~'l ,:,'\ ,;~- ¡·I·~"SI$' --1:; ~ il'l i! ~~fz-21f3.1 ' 'I < "'" ' y f , I"'. 'r " '- F" ~ A h- ,.",,,,..,,; . ,,. :~ ~ / I-2 ÞÁ',;, 1 \~&.'-;dil~~ I:' J h',:.,~ .;.r7'~ /' L I I /. ~"~,q .\. 'rj\ .,....... "', ,'T : -C-I I ¡I~~.~ su ~þ <;/£~::-: ~jJ.:..u---"I:.., _¿~rw= AG J lot· t:t:: ,} A ~f Q~..... r~_-1\ --'-~r R~¡:_-,G. .j{--jl!L _ _rl '~- /' r" : ;.:.c:.:E: - ~-:¡'::-:--jcp~' I I ,Q ~ ., '-'-'_--:.r--: ~ -=-.¡r : ... \ /..~ , ,,' /"" l'----'-~"... _~~..~ --/": './ _1":' ;,' %/ R-2 II~írl"'tl" I! ! -+-j]tL).[, ~r~'Ä! -~'ffr >=/ /1 . , ' , , "'\_ , "'rill "II ........ . C-2, V- /t'¡, ~ ~f--'_ --1.;1 ,~, _ -: n F... .... ""!:'.,. ~ R, '2 00' ,'- . . >--<'1 't:: .., ~I ;r-- ',:: :"'t;;( ·7p. ì-: \I ';, ,.t.~'.,~:. , ~,-;'2J '- _ _ 8 C;JiT-2 ~iJl ~~ "---">1 r- AG " , ,.,.,. ~..'- .' , . ~'~ H ~ . I ~ // ... ~ Ii ~' L[[~ 11 I )J11JI J I , I Ii" '. - .Q~ R-2- I ~~.r-L¡f,~ I R-2""'7;1:. f----, R-' < L.'- '- C-2 '600 R-, "'--t I, .?' p" Þ t'! :-2 ; ...... '! ~ ¡--I r.: ~ ~ -- " ' T ! 1-' -1 ,,*'1:1 ' '\ \ ! iJ ... -1 - '-. ..." .Gk ' r--j -- - AG p',1 .. II . C c- !' "_SlfOn I I-I l ' , AIRPORT ' i I I " "7 I -I ~ ; J9E R-3 ~ ¡ / ' - ,~~" I ;.~,¡ \SJ I;-- ,~, I / ~H I]~,~)~~~ \~ I " µ.J ~~~,y lit L R-2 ~~0»' LLc '+:'(>~-/~ê¡r: ~it~ I. , Ii .úJ J Ul ç., C.-2 ~ ffi) 1i--4'-",:: . - ,. j !é¥o I W -----:iFlj '!J~iæ ,-c --"-+L,: . r 7& ',' Jßôt:j; I :8.3\: G" I : i¡~MiiF ?;:?t ::-(~R~~i't, · ,- ~;;! c-, sud , R-' , LJ -'.:J:l ' I - -III:(~ c-' g, r - t=: j r:I, rTT~ ro. ~-2-__ I '-' :r. O\l~ -, 'J- I R-3- ~ L--~~~~O ..... , L-J.-"'"' "' , ' " 2000 ~- ~~>1~ ~D AG } - < /~ ~ \" ! ) 1jij "odO..- F"JT ..~. ~ . 2 " v:.<.>,Æ -= --;: i'fT- - ~ >',! I !.~lllJ:. ,,~ - --= / . 'T = I'.. i:'T~ -;¡.-- ..' ~ -", -~ ¡-~ ~f-5+D, ~y,."··".,f r .-<, ~-Jcl R- .~ i -...- I.,",~ I' ~J: .1"\.. '., ~.."...::.,. :~ m ~ ''i:: ~ "h'T' '- ',' 1 , ¡ .-V,.- I i'r-f:-L/ oi::: ' -', '-i -'--~ f- '-....&0... -...,.{ I ;r-x.;'- --.:1E ~ ,-:þ ~"! ;- 'c,. ,</1 '" "~' I·.. "'-:!f-;- ,¡..;~ :-0<""- - ....:~~ AGr-- ='" 8 'r~lt('bl ì ~ " ..J" I I /" L R __ .1. ~'. I ¡;,}\'r I i : '.(=8)-- AG c-, "~,Yu,¡¡, IT! ' -.,.... ì, I i\ .. L! -=-, ~:"- " I AI' ¡¡ T t-+ ~c::Jr ~~ª\..~ ..::....~.~ . """J. I I ===1 1-------1 - "I-' f- ~ ~ .1 - ~~ ~~:- '-i~ - -I-,I-----J. ~:*-ê',)-:. ~.ij 1_ .5;,: ~ "1'f§W' . !j.t3= I' , :;- -. '" , ~~"~/"í.~ ! '- . '''' /,.( 1+.-1--1.,\. ".-~/ = t=- ~, ... L ~" ,A,- :: y~ '-. '""'7t1y!'-~~r\ Í\\"tr- J ~~ , ~ V ~ ", ¡ i: ii) / :: " 1 'T'¡! 'I J , I.:' ¡: ¡ ¡: III i i i ' "¡~ hl,::U, , ~,t!---r I ~ - , lL~;I;I:li;ì III :; "¡!I ¡ I''; " I I ,0, Iii Iii ¡ I I I I I : ¡ , j I I ~ i , : , I {? --..:~._..... !-. - I ; AG - -----:::::. I - :-1 ¡----¡ I I .- AG ~ Page 3 ~ P & Z Minutes September 26, 1985 ',,- 3. PS 85-63 PS 85-63 APPROVED r Request of Hanson Properties for replat of Lots 12-21, Block 1, Nob Hill Addition. Mr. Stembridge with Stembridge and Associates came forward. Chairman Bowen said Lot 17 has a 15 foot building line instead of 20 feet. Mr. Stembridge said that was correct. He said because of the topography, the house must face the cuI de sac. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-63 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 4. PS 85-64 // // PS 85-64 APPROVED 5. PS 85-65 / / PS ~5~65 -ROVED "'- Request of Omega Southwest Energy, Inc. for preliminary plat of Fountain Square Addition. // / / ./ Jesse Vielma carne forward to represent Omega Southwest Energy and_to answer any questions. There were no . / quest~ons. ~ Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 857.'64. Jhi~ motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-/, Rsquest of Heritage Development Company for final plat of Spring Meadows Addition. Chairman Bowen stated the only question was regarding the assessments on Smithfield Road and this would have have to be decided by the City Council. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PS 85-65. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. ( ( . KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas '-- September 10, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-943f CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NOB H LL ADDITION, LOTS 12-21 BLOCK 1, REPLAT, PS 85 - 63. GRID MAP 72 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 We understand that lots 18, 19, 20, and 21 may be eliminated from this proposed plat. If this is the case, then comments herein regarding these lots should be disregarded. 2 We would note that street grades on Nob Hill Drive and Nob Hill Court range from about 8 to 13 percent. The maximum recommended street grade is about 6 to 7 percent. Since we are not aware of any official subdivision ordinance requirement which limits street grades, we would defer comment on the potential operation and maintenance problems associated with these excessive street grades to the Public Works Department. We would note that channel access ramps in North Richland Hills are normally designed for a maximum 16-percent grade (for reference purposes). 3 The Owner I s Acknowl edgement and- Dedi'cat i on Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. 4 Zoning Commission and Council Endorsement blocks should be affixed to the p 1 at. 5 The existing zon~ng for this development area should be noted on the Plat. 6 In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer's Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan: 6.1 I, , a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographic information used in this study is in compliance with said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this "~ 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367 ( Subdivision Review Letter continued ( NOB HILL ADDITION \~ workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper subsequent detailed construction planning. SIGNATURE , P. E. SEAL 1 The gate valve on the 6-inch water line should be moved from south side of Nob Hill Drive to the north side at the 8 X 6 inch tee. 8 The size of the water and sewer services should be shown. 9 The owners should be required to escrow their prorata share of street and drainage improvement costs on Precinct Line Road. If the owners proposes to construct such improvements at this time, detailed plans should be submitted to our office. 10 The minimum lot width at the building setback line on Lots 14, 15, 16, and 20 is less than the lO-foot minimum required for R-2 zoning. 11 The side building setback line of all corner lots should be at least 20 feet minimum according to the ordinance for R-2 zoning. 12 The owner should be required to obtain the additional right-of-way from Lot 3 Block 1, Martin Addition and the tract owned by Herman Salazar to the north of this replat in order to make the minimum 50-foot right-of-way for Nob Hill Drive. 13 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. if you hav~ ~S. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works '- September 10, 1985 PS 85 - 63 PAGE 2 ( Subdivision Review Letter continued Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ~ .... , September 10, 1985 PS 85 - 63 ( NOB HILL ADDITION PAGE 3 ; ~ .. I Nob Hill Addn. f Replat B. 1 ( r Page 2 '-- and we request special consideration on Lot 17 due to its irregular size. 12. We have submitted Lot 3, Block 1 for a Replat dedicating the additional right-of-way. Our client is in negotíation on the Salazar tract. ~:r:.,; 13. The developer has been made aware that he is all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and applicable City Development Codes. responsible for Zoning Ordinance, all other ¡. If there should be any further questions, please call. Sincerely, ~~ DRS/et .......... cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Dir. of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development . .~----- ',- ~, <;'i:'-.:.,. -- L\..~~L.............,"~,;(~..¡*...,~,¡¡¡a¡;.~.~~_:~~...."""",",..,,,..;..:<-",,,,,~ ~....,,,.,~-~,>,.....:\.J~~'~¡'~~~'~' 2~¡,;......j~;.~;~~~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ Planning and Development 1 Department: ~\ ~ Plat Application I ~ubject: i This Final Plat The property is running through family lots for 10/14/85 Council Meeting Date: Spring Meadows Addition PS 85-65 1 1 Agenda Number: Application is presented for consideration of Spring Meadows Addition. located on the west side of Smithfield Road north of Chapman Road and to Hewitt Street. The purpose for the proposed plat is to create single development. The property is currently zoned R-3 Single Family. I In the Engineer's review letter for the Preliminary Plat it was noted that Smithfield Road is classified as a four lane Collector Street in the recently adopted Thoroughfare Plan. The construction of the required street would require both street dedication and participation by the applicants in the funding of the future cost of the street. The applicants have responded that they are willing to provide the necessary right of way for the future improvements and have included the right of way in their Final Plat. However, they indicate that their property has already been assessed for the recent improvements made to Smithfield Road and they are unwilling to participate twice. , 1 '1 The remainder of the items in the Engineer's review have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Final Plat of Spring Meadows Addition. T T r T T T r r Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Oper ting Budget er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available r l rL ! I t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM A !{ Yl/~- City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 J~ ;.... '.': ..10112 ~ ~~)::: ~~B~ --j'f I .: J lit ~ \'-r I- ~ I-- '\ I " R-2 ~ . iJI3Z ') ~f- L..... / ._.{~[f- í7 _ j. ~ / "I ¡ ~ 'I ........ Q' ,-' .~-:;::;t:j:::;, ;';', ""f¡' '~.." 'Co, R-2 ' " '¡', ¡'I', 1';'1 ~{}¡f!-& ,:: i I ;-3 ~Bi: .oo~ 2 R->, "" - r" ~ 1£ I~ ~'<0;l:~ _ ~ t= ì..r;=- J 1-2 , C-2 ~&-0-~ _~.:~~-l _ ~ f- fl ! ¡ ,; ¡r .Ai f- ITTÎ ' """I '\-\ ~ ; 1 þ=, l~ r-", +- · \,- R..~·D C-I '.~' ~., ~.h1 \If- ':>.J...~ ~ r--- -' '" ;f.......y- --, -- /lfT I f- I,' '..:ú~'" _r'll I --.../'.,. :.= I I :. ..~ . - - =iíL.121~"- A~t ~L R-7-MF .:J~.¡.v-_. ~ -:rTT! I:¡- ......LR I~ "1'---_ \rlr- AG C-I r-- I I I, 180 I ¡Tn, ' , , .....,. l ===.C= -. ~Ÿ...ii-- f-- f-- !1~ ~u_ jr---:: " f-. t r--' , :.:.<--, I I ~. -=::[.""'--- -¡¡"~ , C I H -== ~'E -=it~, C-I ffl 'þ >-~, -- ~3 ~ rrr: SF R-2 ~ ~ rq: c::: , .--: , ~. t:=- ~ IT ~ --S~ _ ,~ , f:.~ t I::;;,;J I- .;, r- J ~~ ' ::; ID_ ~ t I·, : ': ,i' í, Ii! , t-).J' ~~:' ;'R~3', !;!~l V j¡¡j!\.h ¡Iii Iii I' G :....<:' I 'j , I I .... ~ ?r¡ ii' i· ; ¡I! I I ' - ,+ .'"' II I __:p; ¡ ¡ ¡ I Iii: : j i ; ¡ i ~ ¡ ;0, ! ! i I ¡ ; ¡ II j U I! t 4r. -: I if! i ~ R-31157 r- ~ Õõ a/ 1-2 I ~~~.. ....'M...LtC.O 'C-I /I~~af SUe . ~ '-------, Au - U 109. ff1- . v·} /~ ~ Qi; [u ~. -I I,Q /.. // ':Ç. ~ 'L'" 9LLR ~ =-Þ /~ 'R-2 ! I.P? '" I ';-;1,1 .' C-2 ~ / ø i- IF I' Ar. L' ç' t. '_ su* .,. ~ · , " , . , : ""-15"', ,.!" H '.<:-2 ',., _ / /.' , . , ¡:¡.. R-2 ....... : ~, IJ' I II. I i I , " '" ¡ ,, , " ;.:_ -' /' ~ l' II " : I (;' i'j, " ':','" , r , ..!I .L :. . C-2 ,-> /' AG [ ._ CT. · '- i', , , ¡'; f· , 11 , ~T l;t: ,", J /'/' /'., l' ;i \ F.P. / ~ Ii'" .." '.t' '1\ ( "'I r- ~ '" "-'in- '1-2 /.0/",,/ 0" R-2- I /, ; " ¡ " ,,," " \ " I 'J$ -, , " %?' ' C-2 1600 '-- ~.\'~' '6FÚÌ;' , '.. ' I!' '\\" r, "'," .. , 1"-:: ~ 1-2 0 R-'" :- \ / - ::1lJ~(¡" , '"'' '" i,' d!',/ e-: -~Jl.i~~;"~ --Þ ,..fi.:LR....~ ¡ . t- " " ~ I, ., "' , TT ~ _. "' .l :-$i.'- ~, ' < ..fWT "'''' I i I '" I' V" . 1./ ,~ >"" ,">0' ,0. 5-&':" :':::- L ' '. 1 ,l''''í::7i ~~C/ I ~:: ,:';~ " ?,,:; ~#fi2 -- :=-;..:::; rl -C-I ~,ì~~~~~' '::i" j": ,", -~.~~ I III t~fl r- J'ts on >;<-.,' tJ1.; 4< f,,';> ~ -= / , ~ ßV ~ '" '1='" -V'''. :v..___ -~ I È ....~ ' ~I '.0 ~ S-L!:t,I1::t: ~ III ' r Ie: ~ f ~;,~ , '~' J¿j f= f1 \, vJ¡llT": H,,, 'II!· ~ c-, " , ,"=--- /j I " _~¿*'" < IV t · \ i-- - , 'I" '-'- \\~ \ ~~ \ AG ~ '-----, '."'1:--1 i'l l R-2 -+«. ~0V ~\" \ ~-- - U <, '",:" c-, ~(\' -- \ R-7- A . '¡<:j' R-7-"" ' , ME '~ ,IX..} ~I I ~-~. AG ;::?~~\ u ~: ç¡u 1133 ~ R-3 _\:S/J~ ~:.;:; I ~ Co2 ,~ ~. -'I.J::\'tJl:iiJ I ~\ ~~ ,,,,,__ i ¡ I "'-, ::.u-" I M ~ - .. . 1: AG IL' æ 'I ,~ f-' L-- f= t-- r--- . ~ , f- - , or- - , .- C- AG R-2 1171 r-r-- ~ R-2 1/25 ---- AG ~ t--+- f::: ~V T ~~. ~ Ä\"" ~.~, - N__ rf' I ~ ......, I I -\:I , - \ I I-- 1~ -r-'j -¡.....: ¡- .......... I = ',i.k, ., t-Ir I F: I , h:' I ~ - " ~\" II> . tV J ,~.... '- - :=f R-2 III' - - ::r I c; 1",0 I ~i ---- R-, I .~ I ",~GY' ~ I ~ ~ I 1.1~j· ---- , .. 'R:-l~ Þ-~b-. 1800 ':;~Ro.? ~ "i ¡I"" AG 1=".:æ:.:.:.:: r- f-. I_'~ 1=l ~ l- f- -= ~ F - ;~I- :.-= . - , . ¡ ---. -- . ~ r: L: j ~ ~~ , J ¡. - I- AG I- L Page 3 P & Z Minutes September 26, 1985 (- ( '--- 3. PS 85-63 / / Request of Hanson Properties for /~ replat of Lots 12-21, Block 1, Nob' Hill Addition. /' ,/ Mr. Stembridge with Stembridge and Associates came forward../ / Chairman Bowen said/Lot 17 has a 15 foot building ;;né instead of 20 feet. Mr. Stembriß~ said that was correct. He said befause of the topography, the / house must face the cuI de sac. M~Od made the motion to approve S 85-63 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. PS 85-63 APPROVED 4. PS 85-64 Request of Omega Southwest Energy, Inc. for preliminary plat of Fountain Square Addition. Jesse Vielma came forward to represent Omega Southwest Energy and to answer any questions. There were no questions. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 85~64. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 5. PS 85-65 Request of Heritage Development Company for final plat of Spring Meadows Addition. Chairman Bowen stated the only question was regarding the assessments on Smithfield Road-and this would have have to be decided by the City Council. PS 85-65 APPROVED Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PS 85-65. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. , .\.. .'. ( Elliott & "Hughes, Inc. Engineers /Planners ( '-, September 17, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 North East Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: SPRING MEADOWS ADDITION, BLOCKS 1 and 2 Final Plat and Final Construction Plans PS 85-65, Grid Map 78 Chairman and Members of the Commission: We have received a copy of the letter addressed to the Commission from Mr. Richard Albin, P.E., acting in his capacity as City Engineer, wherein he provides four (4) separate comments relative to the above captioned subject. The purpose of this correspondence is to formally advise you of both our thoughts and those of our client as they relate to the City Engineer's recommendations. Item No.1: This item has been completed and the final plat submitted for approval. Item No.2: Item Nos. 6, 7, and 8 of the City Engineer's letter of July 18, 1985, were addressed and agreed to. (Please reference our letter of July 29, 1985.) Item No.3: All sanitary sewer services have been revised to reflect their locations in the center of each lot. - Item No.4: The owner/developer and his engineer fully understand the requirements and their respective responsibilities with regard to devel- opment of land in the City of North Richland Hills. As in the past, we will make every effort to comply with all the requirements set forth in the Rules, Regulations, Ordinances, Policies and Procedures of the City. We would also direct your attention to the City Engineer's comments on the preliminary plat of this addition in his letter of July 19, 1985 regarding future improvements on Smithfield Road; and further to our comments and response to this item in our letter to the Commission dated July 29, 1985. While we understand disposition of this item will be determined by the City Council as they consider the final plat, we wish to reiterate our position and that of our c 1 i ent wh i ch was set forth in the above referenced correspondence. 2275 Westpark Court, Suite 201 . Euless, Texas 76040 . 817/267-1303 ( ( Planning and Zoning Commission '~ Page 2 We trust the foregoing adequately presents both our position and that of our client in those matters addressed by the City Engineer. We repsect- fully request your favorable consideration of the final plat as submitted. Representatives of our office and the owner will be present at the regularly scheduled meeting of September 26, 1985 and will be available to expand on our thoughts presented herein, or to answer any additional questions you may have concerning this proposed development. cc Heritage Development Company; Mr. William E. Pasteur, Trustee Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Mr. Richlard Albin, P.E., City Engineer file "- r') (. EHictt &.HughesJ Inc. / Engineers /J:=lanners '- July 29, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 North East Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: SPRING MEADOWS ADDITION, BLOCKS 1 and 2 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Construction Plans PS 85-44, Grid Map 78 Chairman and Members of the Commission: We have received a copy of the letter addressed to the Commission from Mr. Richard Albin, P.E., acting in his capacity as City Engineer, wherein he provides nine (9) separate comments relative to the above captioned subject. The purpose of this correspondence is to formally advise you of both our thoughts and those of our client as they relate to the City Engineer's recommendations. Item No.1: This item will be completed prior to the submission of the Final Plat on the development. Item No.2: The telephone number of the owner has been included on the Preliminary Plat. _ Item No.3: We have corrected the metes, and bounds description to correspond with the Preliminary Plat and boundary survey of the property included in the development. Item No.4: Mr. Albin addresses the new Thoroughfare Plan, wherein Smithfield/Keller Road has been upgraded to a IC4U" collector with a minimum 68-foot right-of-way width and a 49-foot pavement width. Smith- field/Keller Road is an existing improved roadway (with curb and gutter) situated in a 60-foot right-of-way with a 41-foot pavement width. It was constructed in late 1973 under an Assessment Paving Program, and all requirements of the City of North Richland Hills at that time were complied with. We must, therefore, take exception to the comment that the Owner "'- 2275 Westpark Court, Suite 201 . Euless, Texas 76040 . 817/267-1303 Planning and zon~ Commission .,,- (\ ) Page 2 '--- escrow funds for the future widening of the street, since the property has already been assessed in the past. We feel such an additional assessment is improper; and possibly illegal. Our client will dedicate the additional four (41) feet of right-of-way along the west side of Smithfield/Keller Road for future street widening. We would ask, however that you waive the requirement for the developer to acquire additional right-of-way on the opposite side of the street. As noted previously this is an existing improved street, and should the City ever elect to widen it to conform to the recently adopted Thoroughfare Plan, the new section could be constructed within the present 60-foot wide right-of-way, or the additional four (41) feet acquired from the property owner by the City at that time. In addition, it is our opinion that Section 1-01 E. of the Subdivision Ordinance on which Mr. Albin bases the acquisition requirement, is applicable to unimproved roadways and not those which currently have permanent improvements in place. Item No.5: We have corrected the water layout sheet on the preliminary construction plans showing the limits of fire hydrant coverage as required for the zoning. Item No.6: The owner/developer will pay his pro rata share of the existing 8-inch sanitary sewer and proposed waterline in Hewitt Street as outlined in the Engineer's letter. The owner also understands he must pay for the street improvements on Hewitt Street in accord with the Paving Assessment Ordinance for that project. Item No.7: The owner/developer will pay his pro rata share of the existing 6-inch water line in Smithfield/Keller Road at the rate of $4.00 per linear foot, based on a total length of 272.40 feet. Item No.8: Representatives of our office have met with the Director of Public Works regarding the method by which sanitary sewer service will be provided not only to the proposed Spring Meadows development, but also to other propert ies on the east s ide of Hewitt Street. We are present ly in the . , Planning and zon~ Commission Page 3 r ~ '- process of working out a final design for these improvements, as well as an agreement with the City pertaining to the payment for the cost of the construction which wi 11 in all probabil ity be performed as "Extra Work" by the contractor currently working on the Hewitt Street improvements. The installation of the 60-inch diameter storm drain as a part of the Hewitt Street project effectively denies sanitary sewer service to those property owners on the east side of Hewitt. This proposed sewer crossing will therefore not only serve the proposed Spring Meadows Addition, but will provide service for other owners north and south of this tract. Item No.9: The owner/developer and his engineer fully understand the requirements and their respective responsibilities with regard to devel- opment of land in the City of North Richland Hills. As in the past, we will make every effort to comply with all the requirements set forth in the Rules, Regulations, Ordinances, Policies and Procedures of the City. We trust the foregoing adequately presents both our position and that of our client in those matters addressed by the City Engineer. We repsect- fully request your favorable consideration of the corrected Preliminary Plat as submitted. Representatives of our office and the owner will be present at the regularly scheduled meeting of August 8, 1985 and will be available to expand on our thoughts presented herein, or to answer any additional questions you may have concerning this proposed development. . cc Heritage Development Company; Mr. William E. Pasteur, Trustee Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Mr. Richard Albin, P.E., City Engineer File '- '---. <: ( . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas "--- September 10, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-906, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SPRING MEADOWS ADDITION, BLOCKS 1 and 2, FI NAL PLAT, PS 85 - 65, GRID MAP 78 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Please see our review letter dated July 18, 1985, PS 85-44, regarding differences in bearings and distances. 2 We would remind you of our comments in no. 6,7, and 8 in the above mentioned letter regarding water and sewer prorata and construction of sanitary and storm sewers. 3 All sewer services should be to the center of the lots. 4 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless sp~cific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Ple-g¡~e~ns. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works ',-- 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 , ~ ·0 cl) '- . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 18, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-906, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SPRING MEADOWS ADDITION, BLOCKS 1 AND 2, PRELIMINARY PLAT, PS 85 - 44, GRID MAP 78 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of the final plat. 2 The telephone number of the owner should be shown on the plat. 3 The bearings and distances in the metes and bounds description do not match those on the plat. 4 The new Thoroughfare Plan proposes Smithfield Road to be designated as a C4U Collector with a minimum 68-foot right-of-way width and a 49-foot BIB pavement width. The plat shows Smithfield Road with a 60-foot width. The developer should be required to dedicate an additional 4-feet to provide 34-feet for their half of this street. Techn~cally, the Subdivision Ordinance states that the developer could be required to acquire the additional right-of-way on the opposite side of the street in addition to his own dedication if you so direct. If you chose to waive this provision, then we would suggest that it be covered in the City-Developer agreement to avoid future problems. The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of the future construction of Smithfield Road or construct such improvements himself. Detailed plans and profiles of any such thoroughfare construction should be provided for review. 5 Circles of fire hydrant coverage have not been shown based on the requirements for this zoning. 6 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 8-inch sanitary sewer and the proposed 6-inch water lines in Hewitt Street. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for the sewer line and $4.00 per linear foot for the water line each at a length of 267.4 feet. Assessments for the proposed curb and gutter, paving, and storm drainage in Hewitt Street should also be paid. '- 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 .. ..........'..~, _;c:--!o.l.:....:_..............~~.~...:h.......: ...''''__'''-'~'¡''''_-~'''~~-Å;.''t'i(.~.....~;.- :;..,.._.,...-.-n-~, ~'.~_"J.. ~,' /--) 'Subdivision Review LetttJ continued .( S~ i'MEADOWS ADDITION .. ''-..- 7 The develope~ should pay his prorata share of the existing 6-inch water line in Smithfield Road. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for a total length of 272.40 feet. 8 The developer is planning to connect his proposed 6-inch sanitary sewer line in High Meadow Drive to the existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line located on the west side of Hewitt Street. The proposed 6-inch line will cross a future 60-inch diameter storm drain which is presently under contract by the City. The developer is proposing to construct a storm drain vault at the intersection of the 6-inch sewer line and the 60-inch storm drain and provide a ductile iron sewer span through the box, (See sheet 5 of the plans). We have no objection to this procedure if the Public Works Department approves the storm drain vault sewer span, and the developer should be required to pay for the cost of construction of the new manhole on the existing sewer line, the storm drain vault, new sewer line and any other costs required to cross the storm drain and tie the proposed sewer line into the existing main. If the developer wishes to have this construction added to the existing City contract with P&R Construction Company, then we would request that the developer's engineer prepare scale drawings and a change order for approval by the Public Works Department and City Council to amend the existing contract. Or, the developer may wish to work out a separate agreement with the contractor, P&R Construction Co., for this extra work if the Public Works Department has no objections. The developer may also wish to include the proposed -- water line crossing in the City contract at this time as well. 9 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. -- Pll11::Z;;~ ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development - - - -.... July 18, 1985 PS 85 - 44 PAGE 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Fire Department Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: GN 85-98 I ¡ , l.- .. ~ Subject: ~ I l I ~ I ~ I I ~ I ~ ~ , ~- I I 1 I ~ ~ 1 I I ì I : ì ~L I I , 1 Resolution No.· 8$...27. S~ecial Pre.entation Resolution No. 85-27 ift.tø~ip~esented toCharl.es.od~1.guezfto1l1 the City of North Richland HillEl commend~.hillJo:r:ir¡¡avingtbelifeofacitiZ~. Also, Fire Chief Gertz will present, on behalf of the Fi1"ieÐepartment , a. plaque to Rodriguez. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 8$-27 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget ~. her ........ . ...... .................... ... ... ............ .... ...IØt..................i.·..........·..>...../1. .. . . 1Z;..~ .....>...'i..~~. . ep ment Head"tgl'1.t!~> ... . ....... .... .. .';,/ .. .OUyManager crr:YCOtJNCIL··.ACT{ø"!Jrf.,1~· N/A Finance Review Acet. Number N I A Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director i I I L Page 1 of 1 "-.-}':',''-J:i.;.,;.,:'' ~. -'>:·'·:·:··T' " ;; ,;;, ,.:,:,~::;,::/,:..-, ::>j:'- 'i~.Æ\<'.<: RESOLUTION NO. 85-27 ~ WHEREAS, on September 2, 1985, Charles Rodriguez, ~n total disregard of his own safety, entered a burning residence at 7701 Buck Street in North Richland Hillsj and WHEREAS, while in the building he located a sole occupant who was unconsc~ous after being overcome by smoke and heat from the firej and WHEREAS, without aid, Rodriguez rescued the occupant by carry~ng him to safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: The City Council does hereby extend its commendation to Charles Rodriguez for his brave and unselfish feat in rescu~ng and saving the life of a fellow human being. Be it known that his ~/ humanitarian gesture in accomplishing this feat without regard to his own safety and well-being ~s an outstanding example of sacrifice by a man who placed the value of another's life above his own. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of October, 1985. Dan Echols, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary September 27, 1985 '- Mr. Rodger N. Line City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 180 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE SUITE 800 CHICAGO, IWNOIS 60601-7476 312: 977-9700 Dear Mr. Line: We are pleased to notify you that your comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1984 qualifies for a Certi- ficate of Conformance in Financial Reporting. The Certificate of Conform- ance is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomp- lishment by a government and its management. When a Certificate of Conformance is awarded to a government an Award of Financial Reporting AChievement is also presented to the individual des- ignated by the government as primarily responsible for its having earned the certificate. Enclosed is an Award of Financial Reporting AChievement for: ',-- Lee Maness Director of Finance The Certificate of Conformance plaque will be shipped under separate cover in about six weeks. We hope that you will arrange for a formal presenta- tion of the Certificate and Award of Financial Reporting AChievement, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. A sample news release is enclosed. We suggest that you provide copies of it to the local newspapers and radio and television stations. We hope that your example will encourage other government officials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an appropriate standard of excel- lence in financial reporting. If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if we may be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION )G.o{ «. ßk- David R. Bean Assistant Director/Governmental Accounting Programs ,-~B/pp Enclosures FOIMIILv tHE MUNICIIW. FINANCE 0fI'ICERs A5SOCIAJJoN WASHINGTON OFFICE: SUITE 200· 1750 K STREET. N.W . WASHINGTON, D.C. . 2000/, . ?n?"...... "". A -- \~ GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION NEWS RELEASE EXECUTlI,Æ OFFICES: 180 NORTH MICHIGAN AI,ÆNUE SUITE 800 CHICAGO,IWNOIS60601-7416 312: 977-9700 RE: Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting The Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting has been awarded to: City of North Richland Hills by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1984. The Certificate of Conformance is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomp- lishment by a government and its management. ,-By being awarded a Certificate of Conformance, the CAFR of a government has been jUdged to substantially conform to the programs high standards of excellence. Such standards encompass both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. To earn a Certificate of Conformance a government must demonstrate a con- structive "spirit of full disclosure" effort to clearly communicate its financial story, enhance understanding of the logic underlying the tradi- tional governmental financial reporting model, and motivate persons and groups in society to read and use the CAFR. Eligible CAFRs are evaluated by an impartial Special Review Committee composed of government finance officers, independent certified public accountant, educators and others with particular expertise in governmental accounting and financial reporting. When a Certificate of Conformance is awarded to a government, an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement is also presented to the individual des- ignated by the government as primarily responsible for its having earned the certificate. An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded to: Lee Maness Director of Finance NOTE: Further information concerning the Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting Program is available upon request. - FOAMERLYTHE MUNICIW. FINANCE 0fRCEIIS ASSOCIAJION WASHINGTON OFFICE: SUITE 200. 17M ( ~ f\ W. \'I""U'~""T,",,, ......... _ ,,^^^, - ',,-- PRESENTATION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE PROGRAM AWARDS As an element of the ongoing objective for the improvement of the Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting Program, your Government Finance Officers Association state representative or his/her designee can be available to present the Certificate of Conformance and the Award of Financial Reporting Achievement at a local function. This allows the recipients to be formally recog- nized for these outstanding accomplishments. If you would like to receive your award through this form of presentation, please contact your state representative. Your representatives mailing address and phone number is listed below: West Dale E. Schultz Director of Finance City of Hurst 1505 Precinct Line Road Hurst, TX 76053 817/281-6160 East Lance Lalor City Controller City of Houston P.O. Box 1562 Houston, TX 75080 713/222-3851 '- ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .... I i ... Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: GN 85-97 SUbject: Texas Water Plan, Resolution No. 85-26 ¡ I ~ The attached resolution supports the adoption of a new proposed Texas Water Plan that will appear as Amendments 1 and 2 on the November 5th statewide constitutional amendments ballot. Attached to the resolution is a memo from the chairman of the Texas Municipal League Water Task Force and a summary of the proposed plan provided by TML~ Also attached is an Analyses of Proposed Consititutional Amendments furnished by State Representative Charles Evans. Both our state representatives, Charles Evans and Bill Carter, support the adoption of the water plan as it could potentially be very beneficial to the cities. l l Recommendation: Adopt resolution supporting Texas Water Plan. 1 l 1 ~- 1 1 1 1 1 'ij/A Finance Review Acct. Number NI A Sufficient Funds Available 1 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other "-r " - 1 Kfd/~ Department Head Signature ' Ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 ---- RESOLUTION NO. 85-26 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ADOPTION OF THE NEW TEXAS WATER PLAN AT THE NOVEMBER 5, 1985 CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS ELECTION WHEREAS, rapid economic expansion and population growth are taxing the state's existing water resources to their limits; and to meet the current and mid-term needs of the state will require the construction of at least 44 new reservoirs, 200 major wastewater treatment systems and scores of large-scale flood-control projects; and WHEREAS, city governments, which historically have born the major part of the responsibility for financing water resource facilities, will be required to carry an even greater share in the future due to reductions in federal aid; and WHEREAS, the cumulative cost of the water resource facilities that need to be provided between now and the year 2030 could approach $100 billion -- an amount that far exceeds the ability of local governments to finance without state assistance; and WHEREAS, the 1985 Texas Legislature approved a new proposed Texas Water Plan that, upon voter adoption, will establish a sound methodology for addressing the state's diverse water problems, and create a major new role for state government in helping finance the solutions to those problems; and WHEREAS, the new Texas Water Plan will appear on the November 5, 1985 statewide constitutional amendments ballot as Amendments 1 and 2 and, if adopted, would: (1) Create a $400 million state fund to guarantee water resource bonds issued by municipal governments, thus saving city taxpayers tens of millions of dollars in interest costs; (2) Allocate $400 million in funding for state participation in the cost of oversize capacity of reservoirs and other facilities that exceed immediate local requirements, thus alleviating short-term financial strains on local governments; (3) Authorize the issuance of $580 million in state bonds to be used for loans to cities and other local governments, including $190 million for water supply facilities, $190 million for wastewater projects and $200 million for flood-control facilities; and (4) Establish a state loan fund to assist farmers with the purchase of water-efficient irrigation equipment, and provide state financing for agricultural water conservation research programs; and ~ Resolution No. 85-26 Page 2 \....... WHEREAS, state legislation that will be implemented upon adoption of Amendments 1 and 2 would enhance the preservation of the state's water resources by establishing safeguards for bays and estuarine areas; providing incentives for water conservation; and by authorizing the creation of voter-approved mechanisms to protect underground water supplies; and WHEREAS, voter adoption of Amendments 1 and 2 is essential to insure the state's future well-being and the continued prosperity of Texas cities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills endorses Amendments No. 1 and 2, and urges their adoption by the citizens of North Richland Hills at the November 5 constitutional amendments election. ADOPTED this 14th day of October, 1985. Dan Echols, Mayor ATTEST: - -- Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary '- TMi: TEXAS MUNICI PAL LEAGUE - September 18, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: Member Cities of the Texas Municipal League FROM: Alan Henry, Mayor of Lubbock and Chairman, TML Water Task Force SUBJECT: Request For Your Help in Passing the New Texas Water Plan As you know, the 1985 Texas Legislature adopted a new that will be submitted for voter approval this fall. Amendments No. 1 and 2 on the November 5 statewide ballot. proposed Texas Water Plan The plan will appear as constitutional amendments Acknowledging the critical importance of water resources to ci ties, the TML Board of Directors unanimously endorsed Amendments 1 and 2. Now, with the election just six weeks away, it is urgent that city officials take whatever follow-up actions are necessary to insure voter approval of the plan at the November 5 polls. As a first step, we ask that your governing body adopt a resolution expressing its support of the new water plan. (A sample resolution is enclosed.) Also, it would be very helpful if you would contact other governmental units in your area, as well as your chamber of commerce and civic clubs, and ask them to consider adopting similar resolutions. During the past several years, Texas voters have rejected a number of proposed state water plans, the most recent being Proposition No.4, which was turned down in November 1981. At least part of the reason for those defeats was lack of information, or misinformation, concerning the cost and other aspects of the various plans. This time, we need to do a better job of explaining the specifics of the new water plan to the voting public. As the enclosed news articles indicate, the proposed plan is being supported by numerous political and business leaders across the state. Conversely, the 20,OOO-member Texas Audubon Society has come out against the proposal, while the influential Sierra Club is taking a neutral position. I hope that you will find the attached information useful in explaining and advocating passage of the new water plan to your local media and others. Your assistance with this important matter will be greatly appreciated, please let me or the TML staff know what we can do to support your efforts. 211 East Seventh, Suite 1020 . Austin, Texas 78701-3283 . (512) 478-6601 --- Summary of the Proposed New Texas Water Plan - ..... Texas Municipal League 211 East Seventh Suite 1020 Austin, Texas 78701-3283 September 18, 1985 Background --- For years, Texans have been repeatedly warned about the seriousness of the state's water problems. Now, because of the state's rapid economic expansion and population growth, the day of reckoning is approaching. Scores of local water problems now are threatening to snowball into one enormous statewide crisis. Texas, of course, does not have a single statewide water problem. Rather, it has a variety of related, but distinct, problems that are as diverse as the state's geography, economy and culture--including frequent water shortages, flooding, pollution and subsidence. No area of the state is immune from one or more of these problems. Demands on Texas' limited water resource capabilities have grown geometrically-- to the point that meeting just the current and mid-term needs of the state will require the construction of at least 144 new reservoirs, 200 major wastewater systems and scores of large-scale flood control projects. The cumulative cost of these projects could approach $100 billion, a sum that exceeds the financial capabilities of the cities and other localities that will bear the lion's share of the cost of these facilities. In order to cope with the huge task at hand, what is needed is an orderly plan-- a new Texas Water Plan that establishes a sound methodology for addressing the state's diverse water problems, and one that creates a major new role for state government in helping finance the solutions to these problems. Fortunately, such a plan exists. It will appear on the November 5, 1985 state- wide election ballot as Amendments 1 and 2. In combination with enabling legislation that will take effect when the two constitutional amendments are approved, adoption of these measures will provide the framework for a coor- dinated approach to the state's multifaceted water resource challenge. Components of the Plan The proposed new water plan consists of five separate, though interrelated measures: (1) Amendment No. 1 - a "FOR or AGAINST" proposition on the November 5 ballot that, if approved, would amend the Texas Constitution to authorize the establishment of a local loan guaranty program and the issuance of state bonds to help fund reservoirs and other facilities; (2) Amendment No. 2 - a second proposition, whose adoption would amend the Constitution to authorize the establishment of agricultural water conservation programs; (3) two proposed constitutional amendments, approved by the 1985 Texas Legislature, setting out the specific language that would be added to the Constitution if Amendments 1 and 2 are approved; and (4) House Bill 2, also approved by the 1985 Legislature, that will, upon adoption of Amendment 1, amend the Texas Water Code to impose new responsibilities on the Texas Water Commission with respect to water conservation programs, bays and estuaries, and other water-related matters. In combination, these components form the 1985 Texas Water Plan. Highlights of the plan are summarized below. - 1 - 1. State Funding For Reservoirs "- Th~ most innovative aspect of the proposed plan is a provision for state participation in the cost of major water resource facilities. Under Amendment 1, $400 million in bond funds would be made available for state investments in the oversize capacity of reservoirs, wastewater projects and flood-control facilities which exceed short-term local or regional requirements. Under the proposal, the state could t as one example t provide a major share of the up-front funding for a reservoir designed to meet the water supply needs of a region for 50 years, but with respect to which local governmental units can only afford to construct a 25-year facility. Later, as the region develops and its financial base expands, participating localities would gradually buy back the state's portion of the project. Clearly, the state "buy-in" component of the 1985 water plan will be highly beneficial to ci ties. By providing up-front financing tit will significantly alleviate the cost to local governments of constructing large reservoirs and other water-related facilities. Also, by strengthening the ability of localities to establish regional water resource systems, it will discourage the further proliferation of the small, inefficient water and wastewater units that have become so commonplace throughout the state because of limited fiscal resources and lack of intergovernmental cooperation. 2. State Loans to Localities Amendment 1 also would authorize the issuance of $580 million in bonds to be used for state loans to cities and other localities for water resource projects. Of the total amount $190 million will be allocated for water supply facilities and $190 million for wastewater projects. The balance of $200 million will be made available for state loans on behalf of flood control facilities, which are being made eligible for state financial assistance for the first time. Under the various state water plans enacted over the past 20 years, state fund- ing for water resource projects was generally limited to hardship cases--i.e., localities which, because of financial problems, had trouble selling their water or sewer bonds on the open market. Therefore, as a practical matter the main function of the state's previous financial assistance programs was to provide modest loans to small cities for community sewage treatment plants, elevated water storage tanks and the like. The emphasis of this approach thus limited its usefulness as a vehicle for solving the state's broader water resource problems. Under the enabling legislation for Amendment 1, two significant exemptions are created from the hardship standard. The first is designed to foster the development of areawide facilities; the second will induce changeovers from underground to surface water supplies. With respect to the first exception, the legislation would allow the hardship requirement to be waived for any water supply, sewerage or flood control system which serves an area other than a single county, city or special district. The hardship standard also is subject to waiver for systems operated by individual cities if the plan is to reduce the number of local service providers by absorb- ing them into an areawide facility. - 2 - .~ The purpose of this change obviously is to encourage regionalization. Under the best of circumstances, regional water facilities are difficult to plan because they involve extensive cooperative efforts between local governments. While the new legislation is by no means a panacea, it will at least offer substantial financial benefits to localities willing to involve themselves in regional efforts. The second exception is for cities which convert from groundwater to surface water supplies. Many cities currently rely on inexpensive groundwater supplies that will eventually become unreliable because of depletion, contamination or land subsidence. Hopefully, state financial assistance will provide an incentive for localities to shift to surface supplies in time to avoid emergency situations. 3. Local Bond Insurance Program A third provision of Amendment 1 would create a state bond guaranty program to underwrite bonds issued by cities and other localities. Under the program, which would resemble the municipal bond insurance services offered by private firms, the state would pledge its credit to guarantee the payment of principal and interest on up to $500 million in bonds issued by local governments to finance water development, flood control and sewerage proj ects. Backed by the state's promise to pay in case of default, bonds issued by local units would command a higher rating--and consequently, lower interest rates--on the municipal bond market. For smaller issuers, use of the state's leverage could decrease bond interest rates by as much as 1.5 or 2 percent; for larger issuers, the decrease would be somewhat less. But even a modest reduction in interest rates would mean considerable savings for local taxpayers. If, for instance, a city has a Ba bond rating, the state guarantee would raise it to A. If the city has a Baa rating, the state's backing would increase it to Aa; and so on. In the current bond market, each bond rating grade is worth about 75 basis points--in other words three-quarters of one percent of the rate of interest payable on the bonds. Therefore, if the state were to guarantee $500 million worth of local bonds issued for 25 years, the state guarantee would produce savings of about $50 million over the life of the bonds. 4. Water Conservation The enabling legislation for Amendment 1 would require each applicant for state financial assistance to adopt a water conservation program. In this connection, the Texas Water Development Board would be authorized to mandate cities and other applications to enact a variety of conservation alternatives, including plumbing code standards requiring water-efficient devices, universal water metering, conservation-oriented water rate structures, drought contingency plans and community education programs. Conservation planning also will be incorporated into the state's water permit- ting procedures. Under the new legislation, prior to granting a water use - 3 - permit, the Texas Water Commission must first determine that the applicant has provided evidence that he/she will utilize the requested allocation in an .'- efficient manner. 5. Groundwater Management The enabling legislation for Amendment 1 will require the Texas Water Commission to study conditions in each of 25 designated regions in the state; identify regions experiencing critical underground water problems, such as water short- ages, gas, pollution or subsidence; and prepare a plan of proposed actions for overcoming these problems. Upon reviewing the situation in a particular region, if the commission determines that a regional underground water conservation district is the appropriate vehicle for implementing corrective actions, the commission may call an election on the question of creating such district. A district could only be created upon approval by a majority of the qualified voters voting on the question. If local voters turn down a proposed district, no further action by the commission is authorized. At the same time, however, upon voter rejection of a proposed district, all of the localities within the district will immediately become ineligible for financial assistance from the state for water resource projects. 6. Protection of Bays and Estuaries The new water plan contains extensive provisions to protect the state's coastal bays and estuaries. Under the legislation, the water commission, in the course of granting permits for the construction of reservoirs within 200 miles of the Gulf Coast, must establish requirements necessary to maintain the ecological health of affected bay or estuary systems. Additionally, the proviso requires five percent of the water in reservoirs constructed within 200 miles of the coast be made available for release in order to maintain the wellbeing of down- stream bays and estuarine habitats. 7. Agricultural Water Conservation Amendment 2 on the November 5 ballot establishes a $10 million trust fund to finance agricultural water conservation research, technical assistance to farmers, and desalinization and weather modification programs. Additionally, the amendment creates a $5 million pilot loan program to assist farmers with the purchase of water-efficient irrigation equipment. If the pilot program is successful, the Legislature will be authorized to follow through by issuing $200 million in state bonds to finance a full-scale equipment loan program. Conclusion Historically, local water users and local taxpayers have paid, and will continue to pay mos t of the cos t of water supply, sewage treatment and flood control facilities. For local officials, the problem is that the billions of dollars needed for water projects is in addition to the tens of billions cities will have to spend during the next several years on other public works, such as roads, parks and libraries. These many demands far exceed the cities' financial - 4 - \",---- abilities; therefore, without assistance from the state, the job simply will not be done. For cities, and for the state generally, the new Texas Water Plan represents the best proposal yet devised for bringing cooperative solutions to bear on our critical water resource problems. For the first time in decades we have a balanced alternative that people in all parts of the state can support. If Texas is to arrive in the year 2000 having achieved the twin goals of economic development and a clean, healthy environment, adoption of Amendments 1 and 2 on the November 5 ballot is a necessary first step. - 5 - '~t IJallas ".rwil' ]fr.. August 23, 1985 '--. Water campaign off, running A USTIN caD telephone bulb also will be lie- - TÐ the de- Umed to support the water plan. upt of The idea is not that politidaDs maDY '!'ex- caD pass a water plan. IDstead, the au who h.s idea of that part of the eurdse II "'n Der- limply to show there is nothiD¡ par. ...., tbere tisaD about the water plan, which .. now will cast S1.2 billion iD state credit Ii¡Da tb.It (most of that will be repaid) if both the paUtic:a1 propos1tioDS Ire approved at the campailD polls. for the water plan OD the "ov. S bU- KJJCh more IDbtle. Don-public lot 15 about to be geared up. work will be done iD behalf of the That is an ilDportaDt deYelo~ water plan by local organizations aeDt. if only because we can now and indiViduals who have an inter- comfort the previously v.ncomfort- at iD the vote. able: Before about DOW, there .. A how-to campaign manual wU1 prec:1ous little that c:ouJd haft beeD F to the more than 100 legislators cIoDe publicJy, a)'WJ. _ who haft YOIuntee!"ed to help pass 'I'aans do DOt. cracefally. deal :u w:'~P::~~ ~ with anythiD¡ overtly political until aDd other orpnizatioDl that u.. Labor Day or later. B~e it em the shown npport for the water plm. heat or sloth or tradition or what- The IIWUJal wW give silDple iDJtnIc. ev~, b~t in modern times. s1Dce the UODI on what can be done to hast1e pnman~ were moved out of the YateS for the water plan, iDc1Dd1D¡ summer U1 ~960, it 11 a silDple fact IImple leuer.to-the4ditor. that rou can t ge~ much doDe before At the same time. wort iD tbe the fU'St Monday U1 September. BoustoD area wW be redoubled .. That does not mean the prc>...ter - cause em Nov. S that dty's voterl plan forces have been dormant dur· alIo will elect . mayor ad dty 1D¡ the summer. On the contrary, council Yajor CODtestants, 1Dc:um. they spent the time getting ba1c or· bent Kathy Whitmire ad chal· ganizational wort out of the WIY.m. lenger Louie Welch. alrudy are cluding list-gather1D¡, fund-raisin¡ committed to the ...ter Plan. . 11 ,and big·name-identifying. the active Houston Chamber of Com- Within the next few weea, you merce. will see the first results of that ef· Mast of the TV -radio money ...u- fort, if you are on one or the other of able for the pro....ter plan cam- about a dozen state-Wide political p.ign alJo wW go to the HoustbD m.ailing lists. area. where for the flrst time the Democrats, for example, migh\ AFLaO probably wiU live the get I letter from Gov. Mart White, bond-issui.ng amentl",.."ts its ID~ Ll Gov. Bill Hobby or House Speaker port. Gib Lewis, all of whom helped get Statewide, of coune, the biggest the water plan through the Legisl. problem faced by the pro-water plan tu.re and all of whom are contribut· team 11 the lact of money to pro- 1D¡ their political mailing J..ists. mote the constitutional amend- Republicans. on the other ments, but .ctivists in the fund-f'Ii&. hand, will get I quadruple hit, an 1D¡ drive say that while money endorsement by the State RepubU- hasn't eucUy fiowed into campaign can Eucutive Committee and by all headquaners. promises of monetary three prospective gubernatoriaJ can- support are legion. - - . didates, Bill Clements, KeDt Hance IM11as computer magnate Ross and Tom Loeffler. 'Perot, for example, prol!l.13ed Closer _to the election. Republi- $100,000 for the campaign. and leV· .&11 KINCH. era! companies aDd buiD_ tnde aaodationa have lILIIde s1IDJJar com- mitments, becauaeit is aD issue cam- paign, nther than aD electicm for" public office, 10 corporate money . caD be contributed. . Still. the pro-water plan forces . are aware that all the money in the' . world won't wiD the special election . . If there is I uniform low 'VOter tt1J'Do : out. Withoat ~ersimp1ifying any· th1ng, historically a low turnout is a . Deptive turnout on constitutional .: amendments. So the prc>waterpllD campaign . .. a fairly simple Ipproach: Pay the , man attention to Houston. wbere up . to 3S percent of the vote may be geDr . eraled; CODceDtrate the next effon'_ OD Da.Uas, where a local bond elee- .. Uœ may draw a higher-than-normal tvDout; str.- the natural iDc~ UoD of West ad South Tau 'VOters 11) IDpport water supply ad conser- Yation programs; and tr)' to miDi- =- the oppoIitioD iD water·rich ... Taas. It all IOIIDds easier thc1 it wiU be, pIZ't1cularlyif the money deem't . came iD from special·iDterest Ind other affected organ.tzations. The 1ceDI110 is complicated by concern that Gov. Kark White, dedicated though he is to the wlter plan. mi¡ht louae up the campaign With the ""wrong" appointment to tha.. ~ Teut Wlter Com.m.ission iD the.· DUt couple of weeks. . U White Ippoints IOmeone o~'. DOXious to the Sierra Club or the Leape of Women Voters, for exam- . pie, it 11 quite likely one or both of. . th~ lfOups. "Which otherwise might remain neutral. or It lust' . quieUy opposed, will get out front" . ad actively oppose the two wlter·: ~ted const1tutional amendments. ' White reportedly is 10 sensitive to that possibility, he is more litely to bend the other WlY, flvoriD¡ the environmentalists, than to take a chance of bloWing the wlter·plan e1ecticm. Søm Kinch Jr. edits ø uwsleuer, Texas W~t.II,'" AusttPL The Houston Post September 11,1985 , Fourth time tor state water plan might be the charm filtårí'~ '11Ø~" . ;,~..~~ ..;~, ..... '!"1-"'l - -: .;'1If ...r._ '- The third time's the charm. the saytDg 10e5· But for those leeldn¡ a statewide water plan for Teus, it wasn't. Now. for a fourth time, they're c::ranIdDg up a campaign to sell the voters on such a plan. And while there are still eigbt weeks before the voters go to the polla, aDd the outlook c::ou1d certainly cbaqe in that time. so far i.t appears the fourth time wUl be the charm. " . " In 1969, voters narrowly re'ected (31S.793 to &,516) a $3.5 billion propœed ltate water p1an that c:alled tor trauport-,- In¡ Missiaippi RØer- water'·act'I* the state by canal to." West: Tu.u Irrlption areu. : "". ': >,,' ',: : _' :.:' '. , , . , ' , ID 1976. growing more ,lDspidöùi 01 gi. ant water developments aDd propo&a1s to, move water across the state, voters went " 1,243.451 to 937,9%1 agaiDst a-proposaUo Issue S400 mDlion In water boAdI. :':',:, : In 1981. egged on. by'numeroua oppclliq organizations aDd tnnueaced by a IpUt In the ranks ,of the state's top ,teaœrs, the citizens voted 458.721 'to 339.816 apiDlta multi-bWion-dóliar' '..tel' development plan promoted by tben-Houe Speaker BW Cayton, a West Teus irrigation farmer. On Nov. 5, voters wUl be asked to ap- prove a statewide water plan ca1I1ng for Iauing an additional $980 mil110n in water development bonds aDd $200 mil110n in ..- "cultural water coaaervation boDda, plUl authorizing a program to guarantee _ million in local water project bcmds. Tbe plan bu nUmerous conservation features and provisions aimed at prot.ectin¡ bays and estuaries. , 'Ibese cbanges are embodied in two ~ pœed constitutional ameDdmentl (1 aDd 2) on the Nov. 5 ballot. . A blgb-powerec:l campaign tor voter ap- 'þrova) Is being mountec:l, by a Water for reus' Future Committee 'nm by former , Texas Secretary 01 State John FaiDter, who is volunteer treasurer. and state SeD. ,John Montford. D-Lubboc:k, SeDate JPOD- ,lOr of the water plan. ,', " eo.cbairmen 01 the committee are Bob Lanift' of Houston. cbairman of the State Highways and Public TraMportation Commission; Ed Cœ Jr. of Dallas. chair, man of the Parks and WUdl1fe eomm... !lion, and LouJa Beecherl 01 Dallu, c:ba1r. man of the Teus Water Deveiopment Board. A prestigious list 01 committee mflDbers ill beina assembled. Gov. Mark White. House Speaker Glb x..wts and Lt. Gov. BW Hobby are cam- £'-.':"~""~'.'.~'" paì¡ning for the amndmentl and money to advert1.le them. This ia in marked con- trut to 1B8l, when Gov. Bill Clementi aDd Speaker Clayton worked for voter approv- al at Clayton's plan aDd Hobby was cam- paigning against It. Clementi aDd U.S. Rep. Tom Loemer and fCll"mer U.s. Rep. Kent Hance. a11 fZ' pected to leek oat year'. RepubUc:an go- beruatorial nomination. are 1Uppar'tiDc this ytar'. plan. So ia the State Republi- can Eacuttve Committee. Numeroua legislators are being Uned up to "''''p&i.gn for the plan in their districta. Tbe Wate!' for Tezu' Future Commit- tee bas _t a goal of tais:IDg $1.25 million for itl campaign. to be spent priDcipally on radio, tfolevtsion and newspaper ads and some direct-mail appeals for IUpport. More than $250,000 in caab aDd pledges bas already been raised, Fainter says. Dallas multimillionaire businessman H. Rou Perot reportedly bas pledged $100.000. #' A speakers' bureau and a traveliDg team to promote DeW3paper" editoriallU~ port for tbe amendmenta are being formed. Tbe campaign wUl be eoocentrated pri. marfIy on Houston, which wUl have ita aty CouDctl and mayoral elect10na Nov. 5; Dallas. wtúc:b wUl haw a city bond election that day; and San ADtoD1o, which al80 bas an electton that day on ahnl....!"g the otr:Ice of county treuurer and on fluo. rtdation of the city water IUpply. Fainter anticipates a stateWide voter tumout of only about 800.000. Twenty-five to 35 percent of that wUl be in Houston and about 10 percent in Dallas. be ¡uesøes. He blames defeats of put statewide wa- ter plans mainly on the perception that they would take East Teu.a' IUrplus wa· te!' and give it to West Teua. He says the new plaD appeala more to the whole atate. Although environmental grou~ are DOt particularly happy about tIds year'. plan and it 11 being opposed by the Audubon Society and the Texas Committee on Natu· ral Resources. there 11 mucb _ oppoli- don so far - "en from envtronmentaUsta - than there was to the 1B8l plan. The $Ierra Club, a major environmental group whicb fought previous plana. bas opted not to fight or endorse this plan. So far. the plan seems to bave a much better chance of Winning voter approval than did the last three. '-- Houston Chronicle 9/4/85 -Audubon blasts wàter plan, vows to oppose bond issue By JAN RICH Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau AUSTIN - The National Audubon Society has become the first major en- vironmental group to oppose a '1 billion-plus water financing plan that goes before state voters on Nov. 5. The plan would allow the state to issue water development bonds to 1m- pJement a conservatioD and manage- ment plan created by the Tens Legislature in May. But the Audubon Society believes the water plan does DOt provide enough protection for environmentalJy sensi- tive marine We in coastal bays and estuaries, a spokeswoman for the group said Tuesday. Tbe society has about 20,000 members in Texas. The water plan also would promote more dam construction On Texas riv- ers, said spokeswoman Dede Armen- trout. These additional dams could dry up some rivers, she said. "There are ambitious plans to put a lot more reservoirs in Texas," Armen- trout said. "111 Texas, if every single dam that emts right DOW were actu- ally holding the water that they are empowered to hold there wouldn't be a drop of water to hit the bays." Tbe Audubon Society, like other envi- ronmental groups. also objects to the immense power that the three-member Texas Water Commission would bave over water projects. The commission is ap~inted by the governor. Projects can be premature, entirely unnecessary, ineffIcient, ill-desi~ned and environmentally and financIally disastrous, and yet still be allowed at the discretion of the Texas Water Com- mission," Annentrout said. Environmental groups like the Sierra Club have threatened to oppose the wa- ter plan if they do not like Gov. Mark White's appointment for an upcoming openin~ on the Texas Water Commis- lion, White is expected to announce his replacement for Commissioner Lee Biggart this week. Fonner Gov. William P. Clements Jr. announced his support for the water plan, as have the Texas Association of Business, Houston Mayor Kathy Whit- mire, and the Houston Chamber of Commerce. Opponents concede that they are not likely to raise the $1.25 million that their supporters hope to raise for their campaign_ John Famter, fonner secre- tary of state and the treasurer of an umbrelJa supporc group for the water plan, said be has finn commitments for about $2SO,OOO in funds, and "good" commitments for about $500,000. Much of this money will be used for television advertisements targeted at the Dallas and Houston areas, wbere most of the voter turnout is expected for the Nov. 5 election. The water financing plan wID be di- vided into two parts on the November ballol Proposition 1 autborizes $980 million for construction of reservoirs, ßood-control projects, treatment plants and other water projects. It also iDcludes a proposal for $250 million in state-backed guarantees for water bonds to be issued by cities and other local governments. Proposition 2 would allow the state to issue $200 million in bonds for low· interest loans to farmers for water- efficient irrigation equipment. ~ AusUI\ AUll'r&( on ~- itntl'suUm September 10. 1985 Sierra chapter stands neutral on water plans By ArDold Garcia Jr. AmerIcIr ...atateMlln Staff OttIcfaJs of the Lone Star Cha~ ter of the Sierra Oub said Monday that they wtll neither suppon nor oppose the water amendment proposttions on the Nov. 5 ballot. The two water propositions total '1.4 billion. "The Sierra Oub Wanta Texas citizens to evaluate d1e water package closely and then 4etermlDe on an Indvtdual basis wtlether they vote for or agaIDSt," IÌlid Howard Saxion. chairman of ae state cbapter of the Sierra COub, at a press conference. :: Detend.1D&the club's neutrality, Iren Kramer. lobbyist tor the pup, said an endorsement would 'Wnd a ta1Ie message that every- ta1Da II oay With tbJI packqe:' ~ Kramer and water lawyer Stuart JleDr)' expressed doubt that better I~tion could be written In the Den legislative lelSton. In 1987. they and Saxton said the proposl· tiOns contain &OOc1 and bed "'emenD. ~ Kramer ..d the organization Uå1nb the real battle wtll be In put- tU1& provisions ot the water propo. Jk10ns Into effect. The Sierra Oub would rather spend money and re- ~urces on a "lot of dltterent envl· 1IOmnental Issues that Deed to be ·ltddressed" th8D on a neptive campaign. Kramer "d. .', The three representatives of the 'Bub I81d tbey bad DOt made up Ibelr mlDds oa bow they wtll vote on the measures. "I could literally filp" a colD at this point." said Kramer. Among the provisions the club Identltled as gOOd In the water proposals: · Additional funds for con. struCUon of wastewater tacllltles. · Funds tor bu1Jdlng desaliniza- tion plants as "an alternative to the buUding of dams and reservoirs In c:ertaID areas of the state." Among the proVisIons tailing to meet organization approval: · Funds tor more reservoirs, ' _ The club said: "Many water supply - needs can be met through conser. vation Without having to build some of the reservoirs that may be funded through this package." · Authorization given to the LegIslature to approprtate funds for water projects. The measure "may enable the Legislature to cir- cumvent the voters In getting a~ proval tor large amounts of funding tor water proJects." the club said. MondaYt September ~ 1985 e~r ~llat Jtorlll'lC Jfrlu$ --.. Water Means Business By Ann Melvin 14i1øri4/ Slatl Wriler BUSINESS and industry are throwing their weights behind the Texas Water plan. Chambers of commerce, in- surance exec- utives, subur- ban secretar- ies, computer programmers, tool and die makers, truck drivers, the man at the neighborhood cleaners - urban, suburban and downtown Texas are coming out in support of th£ November vote for Propositions 1 and 2 that would fund a com- prehensive, if not perfect. water plan for Texas. How, in a spring and summer that has not been particularly Doted for either flood or drought, for neither water trage- dies nor water shortages, have Texans developed a heightened interest and awareness of water? And how has tbe water issue maturtd, seemingly overnight, from a weedy, rural issue to a so- phisticated, complex statewide issue? Tbere have been several fac- tors at play here. TO BEGIN with, the current water plan is good enough to at- tract some following on its own. It does extend beyond water sup. ply concern:; of agricultural wa- ter supply: It includes water treatment, water storage, water distribution, ecological con- cerns, water conservation and provides alternative ways for funding of water planning for small cities and suburbs. But more important, even, than the inclusion of this'wide range of water concerns is the fact that those affected by the concerns - businessmen. bome- owners, developers, ecologists - as well as farmers, had a hand in shaping legislation that created the curren 1 water plan. This time the unique prob- lems of each area of the state were taken into consideration when framing a water plan in Austin. Subsidence - the sinking of the land because of overpump. ing of groundwater - in the Houston area added urgency and dimension to groundwater legis- lation. WATER SHORTAGES in Aus- tin and other cities caused, not by a lad: of water. but by a lack of treatment and distribution fa- cilities. heightened interest in the funding portions of the wa- ter plan. Small rural and suburban communities - unable to ex- pand their treatment facilities to keep up with growth, or to switch over to reservoir water storage instead of relying on wa- ter wells (groundwater) - saw light at the end of the tunnel via this water plan's proposal to form water districts that would be eligible for bond insurance and could use state credit rating to help fund water resources. Well. that bad to help. And so response to regional needs has strengthened support of this water bill. But that isn't the bottom line. The bottom line in support for this water bill, as always, is money. It begins in the sophistication of urban businessmen who real- ize much of the state economy rests on agriculture - despite the fact that many jobs like in- surance salesmen, computer pro- grammers. mechanics are Dot immediately IinJr.ed to agricul- ture, But, as the saying goes at a major bank in Dallas, "If we don't plan for the future of West Texas agriculture. dozens of bankers are going to wind up driving secondhand tractors." In other words, just how many banks in this state have huge sums of loans out based on the value of agricultural land WITH WATER. And how many insurance salesmen, clerks, computer whizzes, etc., do you suppose would be pinched for work if the ag-related industries began to fold? Oh, but the economic clout 80es farther than ag-related in- dustry_ Expansion and development of the cities, suburbs and grow- ing towns of Texas would slow down - maybe even stop - dra- matically, if water shortage be- came a problem. Look at it this way: For over 2,000 years habitat for human be- ings has been based first and foremost on water supply. Gas. electricity. telephone, insurance, furniture, wallpaper, paint. diet colas and school clothes all fol- low. All developers. contractors, real estate people, insurance and finance folks ultimately depend on the constant availability of water. Shut the water off, and watch their jobs disappear. OUR PROGRESS, our expan- sion, comfort, ambition, security - all are served first by the availability of water. And the availability of water for Texas over the long haul stands to be served well by our first beginning a water plan. Such a plan is now on the ballot for November. It isn't so unusual, after all. when you think about it. to find more than just Farmer Brown drumming up the vote for water. It has become evident that we are all in this together. '",- WATER PLAN FINANCING · $980 mtUion bOnd issue tor wa- ter SupPly. quahty ano control. · $200 million in loans to t'rmet. 'or wal'Y's.1I~ing equipment. · $250 millIOn Slale insurance tund 10 guarant.. ,.,at.. CONSERVATION · Ulna.lory conserv.ûon plans ' in cities _~Ing slala wal~õ aid. · Local elections to cre,te S)&- Qal dlSlricts tor gfOU!ld_I8f control, · ReseuCII and educallon.1 pro., grama 10 promote conaerv.tlo!\ ont'lIns ENVIRONMENT --..- . limits orl rflSar~o". to pres_ !iVAler flow to Foaslal ~ellands., Dallas Morning News 9/2/85 State leaders prepare to sell water plan to Texas voters By Bruce Tomaso Enll'ironmcnl4ll wnc.r 01 TIle Ne",. Two months before the election, Texas leaders are preparing to launch a $1.25 mil· lion campaign to sell a statewide water plan to voters. The plan, passed by the Legislature in May, would provide 51.43 billion in state aid for water construction and conservation projects - but only if the voters agree on Nov. 5 that the money should be spent. Under the Texas Constitution, any mea- sure requiring an extension of the state's credit - such as the issuance of bonds to finance water projects - requires a consti· tutional amendment approved by voters. . "If it doesn't pass, we've got big prob- lems," said Reg Arnold, manager of the Texas Water Development Fund, the state's pool of money for water projects. The fund has not been increased by voters since 1976. All but about SIOS million of the S600 mil· lion in bonds previously authorized has been spent, Arnold said, adding that the bal· ance "will only keep us going for three or four more years." . ' The campaign, led by Gov. Mark White, Lt. Gov. Bill Hobby and House Speaker Gib Lewis, D-Fort Worth, has received an early boost from billionaire Dallas businessman H. Ross Perot, who has pledged $100,000 to the effort. . "Water and education are the two biggest priorities in the state," said Perot. who last year headed a governor's study commission that pushed successfully for education re- forms. "When we TUn out of water in Texas, the growth stops," Perot said. "About the only thing more important than water is air." Tbe package, if approved, would consti- tute "the most comprehensive water man. ngement program that has ever been at. tempted in any of the United States," said state Sen. John Montford, D-Lubbock. the. Senate sponsor of the legislation. "The -biggest problem right now is to get the money rounded up for the campaign,", Montford said. "I'm going to stan working on that the day after Labor Day. l'U be on the phone continuously next week." , Besides Perot's pledge, about $300,000 has been promised from sources throughout the state, said John Fainter. the former Texas sec- retary of state who is treasurer of the Water for Texas' Future Com· mittee, the umbrella group orches. trating the campaign. Contractors, engineering firms, other busi· nesses, chambers of commerce and civic groups have offered suPPOrt. he said. . "At this point, we've got a lot more pledges than money in the bank." said Fainter, an experienced fund· raiser and longtime political ally of White'S,. _. "Normally, I discount pledges very heavily until ~get the check in hand. But my experience With Mr. Perot is that when he says some- .thing Will get done. it'U get done." , The plan, intended to ensure ad· equate water supplies for Texas (arms and cities into the 21st cen· ~~, includes two ballot measures. :.. Proposition 1 would authorize Øke issuance of 5980 million in bonds for construction of reser· . ",irs. pipelines, treatment plants 'and fiood<ontrol projects through. ~out the state. It also would create a ·S2S0 million state insurance fund to : guarantee water bonds issued by :cities and other political subdivi. ~SiODS. Tbe state guarantee would_ -enable local governments to seU . their bonds more easily. and at ; lower interest, rates, since the ; chance of default would be virtu. 'aUy non~xistenL Proposition 2 would authorize "- s~oo million in bonds for low. inter. . e:st loans to farmers who buy water- ,saving irrigation equipment. Agri- culture, which accounts for nearly .70 percent of all water used in Texas, is causing the slow depletion . of underground water supplies, es- pecially in the High Plains of west Texas. ~ A separate statute, which be- 'comes law only if the first of the "two propositions passes, would im. . pòse water conservation require- åi.ents on all cities seeking state aid . for water projects, It also would pro- !!de for the creation of special local (listricts to control ground water pumping, and restrict reservoir œllStrUction near Gulf Coast bays io protect fish and shellfish that de- ~nd on rivers to carry fresh water and nutrients to the sea. ',.. White said last week he is confi~ ;tent voters will approve the plan, ' which was among his top priorities Guring the last session of the Legis- :1iture. ..:.: White said he's not worried that ::l#Ore money hasn't been collected . far the teleVision commercials, . new5¡)aper ads and mass mailin~ that Will be needed to seU voters on the plan. "Vou don't need the money to- day." he said. "U they were to have it today, they wouldn't have any- thing to spend it on. The important thing is that they have it when they need it. And it's going to be there. I am confident, in the last few weeks of October." To meet the campaign's target of 51.25 million. Fainter said. fund- raising efforts are planned by Hobby, White and Lewis. all Demo- crats. who will send a joint letter to their supporters; by the state Re- publican Party, whose three lead- ing gubernatorial prospects - for- mer Gov. William Clements. U.s. Rep. Tom Loeffler and former U.s. Rep. Kent Hance - all endorse the plan; by legislative sponsors of the water measure, and by business and ciVic groups. "There's a lot of bipartisan grass. roots support that I wish I could take credit for," Fainter said. "But the fact is, it's just happening:' Backers of the plan nonetheless acknowledge concern over what role. if any, environmentalist groups Will play in opposing the wa- ter package. Those groups, led by the Lone Star Chapter of the Sierra Club, are credited widely with have ing helped defeat past water plans, which they claimed were little more than blank checks to finance the wholesale damming of rivers. Since statewide turnout in No- vember is expected to be low - per. haps 800,000 voters, according to Fainter - organized opposition by any group threatens passage of the plan. "When you·re dealing with a constitutional amendment, any time there's opposition, the chances are the amendment Will fail," said Lewis. "People can always vote against something. A 'no' vote is a safe vote:· . Despite the provisions to encour. age conservation and protect coastal wetlands, no major environ. mentalist group has endorsed the November proposal. In several leg- islative hearings on the plan, repre- sentatives of the Sierra Club, the " National Audubon Society. the League of Women Voters and other groups pressed for more stringent enVironmental safeguards than those in the final package. Many of those groups are ex- pected to announce in the next few weeks whether they wiU campaign against the propositions. ''The Audubon Society does not intend to support the water plan;· said Dede Armentrout, the group's Austin·based southwest regional vice president. "The only question now is whether we will ~ctively opo poseil" The Sierra Club has said its deci- sion on the plan Will depend on who White appoints ~o a new va- caney on the Texas Water Commis- sion. Under a reorganization bill passed by the Legislature, the three- member commission assumed con- trol Sunday of most responsibilities, including enforcement of environ. mental statutes. preViously as. signed to the Water Resources De- partment The department ceased to exist as a state agency. And the six. member Water Development Board. which used to be the policy.making arm of the depanment, becomes a separate agency, responsible only for long-range planning and disper. sal of state aid for water projects. "The Water Commission is going to have the major role in determin. ing water policy in this state," said Stuan Henry, an Austin attorney who represents the Sierra Club. "Before we agree not to fight the water plan, we want to make sure the governor appoints someone to the commission who is environ- mentally sensitive." White said a successor to Com- missioner Lee B.M.. Biuart, a Clements appointee whose term ex- pired Sunday, will be made in the next few days. Most attention and money in the election campaign will be focused on Houston, where a mayoral race between incumbent Kathy Whit- mire and former mayor Louie Welch is expected to draw a large voter turnout. , "Very easily 30 to 40 percent of the vote on the water plan could come from Harris County," Fainter said. To appeal to those voters, su~ poners of the plan, led by Ho¡¡ston resident Hobby, will emphasize the program's ßood<ontrol proVisions. Much of the low.lying city, espe. cially along the Houston ShipChan. nel, is subject to periOC!ic flooding, ,Both Whitmire and Welch have endorsed the water plan. "1 feel pretty optimistic," uid Steve Stagner, Hobby's chief adviser on water-related issues. "There's still some hard<ore organizing that needs to be done, in Houston and elsewhere. But I think we'U; get there. " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .... -. Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 } , . I l ! l l SUbject: Nomination for Membership on Tax Appraisal District Agenda Number: GN 85-99 Resolution No. 85-27 The attached letter has been received soliciting nominations for members of the Board of Directors of Tarrant Appraisal District. It is recommended that Mr. Gaylon Mayfield, who is presently serving in this capacity as our representative, be renominated. Recommendation: It is recommended that the attached Resolution be adopted nominating and subsequently casting our 46 votes for Gaylon Mayfield as a Director of the Tax Appraisal District of Tarrant County. l l 1 1 1 1 T T T Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available T ~ ! ""-' T - ~'jÂ/~ Department Head Signature ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director '-- Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 85-27 "-- BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: The City of North Richland Hills does hereby nominate and cast its votes for Gaylon Mayfield as the Director for the Tarrant County Appraisal District. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of October, 1985. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary 46 ',- MADRIN HUFFMAN COUNTY CLERK ,.). . ....... ..- COU~., ·ø·~~ ~"J-'. (l*~¡ ..~ .. OJ: -. ... -. . . .- ... . * . .... ........ TARRANT COUNTY FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0401 October 1, 1985 Honorable Mayor Dan Echols P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mayor Echols: This is to notify you that your taxing unit under the Tax Appraisal District of Tarrant County will receive the number of votes listed on the attached exhibit in the selection of the 1986 Board of Directors. Please furnish this office your nominees before October 15, 1985. Sincerely yours, ty¡~ J/~{lyJ MADRIN HUFFMAN TARRANT COUNTY CLERK MH:c CHARLSIE FITZGERALD CH'EF DEPUTY ~ VOTING STRENG1~ tOR TARRANT COUNTY VOTING ENTITIES FOR 1985 TAXING YEAR "- VOTING ENTITLE}ŒNT 1. ALEDO I.S.D. NONE 2. ARLINGTON 1. S. D. 732 3. AZLE 1. S.D. 27 4. BIRDVILLE I. S.D. 204 5. BURLESON 1. S . D. NONE 6. CARROLL 1.S.D. 23 7. CASTLEBERRY I. S.D. 14 8. CROWLEY 1. S . D . 66 -9. EAGLE MOUNTAIN SAGINA"W 1. S.D. 74 10. EVERMAN 1. S . D . 47 II. FORT WORTH I. S.D. 939 12. GRAND PRAIRIE I. S.D. NONE 13. GRAPEVINE 1. S . D. 111 14. HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD I. S.D. 271 15. KELLER 1.S.D. 64 16. KENNEDALE I.S.D. 12 17. LAKE WORTH 1.S.D. 14 18. MANSFIELD I. S.D. 55 19. NORTHWEST I. S.D. 1- NONE 20. WHITE SETTLEMENT I. S.D. 37 21. GODLEY 1. S.D. NONE 22. CITY OF ARLINGTON 374 23. CITY OF AZLE 6 24. CITY OF BEDFORD 51 25. CITY OF BENBROOK 28 26. CITY OF BLUE MOUND 1 - 27. CIrl OF BURLESON NONE 28. CITY OF COLLEYVILLE 11 29. CITY OF CROWLEY 6 30. CITY OF DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS 2 31. CITY OF EDGECLIFF VILLAGE 2 32. CITY OF EULESS 43 / ~ ~ VOTING ENTITLEMENT 33. CITY OF EVERMAN 5 34. CITY OF FOREST HILL 15 .,.35. CITY OF FORT WORTH 987 - 36. CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE NONE 37. CITY OF GRAPEVINE 52 38. CITY OF HALTOM CITY 32 39. CITY OF HASLET NONE 40. CITY OF HURST 52 41. CITY OF KELLER 8 42. CITY OF KENNEDALE 4 43. CITY OF LAKESIDE 1 44. CITY OF LAKE WORTH, 3 45. CITY OF MANSFIELD 21 46. CITY OF NOR¡n RICHLAND HILLS 46 47. CITY OF PANTEGO 4 48. CITY OF PELICAN BAY 1 49. CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS 9 50. CITY OF RIVER OAKS - 6 51. CITY OF SAGINAW 13 52. CITY OF SANSOM PARK 2 53. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE . 4 54. CITY OF WATAUGA 11 55. CITY OF WESTLAKE NONE 56. CITY OF WESTOVER HILLS 7 57. CITY OF WESTWORTH VILLAGE NONE 58. CITY OF WHITE SETTLEMENT 9 59. TARRANT COUNTY 494 60. TARRANT COUNTY RURAL FIRE DISTRICT NONE It . I - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: GN 85-100 ..... ~"Subject: Re~ulation of Alcoholic Beverage Sales, Ordinance No. 1293 I , Some of our ordinances dealing with hours of sale of alcoholic beverages vary from the state law. The state law has preempted the field of regulation of alcoholic beverage sales. This ordinance adopts the state law. l 1 Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1293 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T , T T N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N I A Sufficient Funds Available lure K ~~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM T Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ,/ T~ , Finance Director 1 Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1293 '-- WHEREAS, the State of Texas has, by statute and departmental regulation, preempted the regulation of liquor, wine, beer and all other alcoholic beverages; and WHEREAS, there are certain variances in hours of operation and hours of sale of alcoholic beverages between city ordinances and state laws. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The hours of operation and sale of establishments selling liquor, wine, beer and any other alcoholic beverage shall be governed by the applicable state law. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of October, 1985. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney ~- ~J CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration 'Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: GN 85-101 '-- Subject: Proposed Beautification Pr01ects At the Budget Work Shop on July 27th, the City Council asked proposal for additional beautification landscaping projects. been developed by the Parks and Recreation Director and will established by the City Council. the staff to develop a The attached proposal has fall within the guideline Recommendation: If City Council sees fit, approve the proposed project and appropriate $10,000 from the L Contingency Fund to provide its financing. - 1 "-, l l I' 1 1 ì ì l , '-- r Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ----Ã- Acct. Number 01-99-01-5970 Sufflcie~s Available ~,~;;:.: -~ City Manager . Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ....... Page 1 of 1 City of J\9rth Richland Hills, Texas ,~ I:' ~,J \~ , .cL ---- ----,-=- --==-~ ......- Pl;/"-::.... "~I f September 30, 1985 TO Rodger N. Line, City Manager FROM: David M. Petika, Director, Parks and Recreation SUBJ: Proposed Additional Beautification Projects RE P&R-M-96-80 On July 27, 1985, City Council requested a proposal for additional lancscape projects that may be included in the '85-'86 Budget. Our proposal is one that will have great visual impact on our City and can fall within the $10,000 guidelines established by City Council. The following is a list of plants to be used along Harwood Road's three islands. Each island is 16 feet wide and ranging from 436 feet long to 920 feet long. 200 - 5 gallons Crepe Myrtles @ $12.00 each $ 2,400.00 450 - 5 gallons Lantania @ $ 2.50 each $ 1,125.00 350 - 5 gallons Pampus Grass @ $10.25 each $ 3,587.50 40 gallons Bluebonnets @ $10.50 each = $ 420.00 Fertilizers, weed control, soil stabilizers $ 2,467.50 $10,000.00 ~=y Dave Petika Director Parks and Recreation Council on this matter would be appreciated. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.0. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 '- '-- City of J\9rth Richland Hills, Texas 4k,¡ -, .::::,- ,it'~ r September 25, 1985 TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: City Secretary The following Board Members terms will/have expired: * Civil Service-Terms expire October 1, 1985 Jeff Newsom - Two year term George Pederson - Two year term - Bob Roark - One year term Lyle Welch - One year term Jack Frisque (Alt.) - One year term * Cable T.V. Board-Terms expired May 1, 1985 Ray Fulenwider - Two Year Term Nancy Gum - Two Year Term Park Board Milt Brockman (Moved out of the City-term expires May, 1987) * All have expressed willingness to serve another term. ',,-- (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.0. BOX 18609/NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TX 76118 -- , ¡"'\1 Date Received: Received By: .~' '-..' '- PROFILE FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS NAME Ron J. Parks ADDRESS 6268 Glenview Dr. EMPLOYER Self OCCUPATION Contractor NUMBER OF YEARS 5 PHONE: HOME 656-8122 OFFICE 232-1350 WIFE' S/HUSBAND' S NAME Lisa G. Parks CHILDREN'S NAME AND AGES N/ A RESIDENT OF THE CITY SINCE May 1980 PREVIOUS RESIDENCE Pueblo, Colorado I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON: (CHECK ONE OR MORE) - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION BOARD OF ADJUS~ŒNTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CABLE TV BOARD MEMBERSHIPS, ORGANIZATIONS AND PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE ON CITY COMMISSION: X PARKS/RECREATION BOARD BOARD OF APPEALS LIBRARY BOARD None COMMENT (ABOUT YOURSELF, SPECIAL AREAS OF INTEREST, WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE, QUALIFICATIONS AND OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION.) was born and raised in North Richland Hills, and wouldn't live an where else. I share her activities. I was also res onsible for the develo ment of some of the facilities. Lisa I served as youth l? Rthlptir nirprtnr in Pl1phln r.nlnr~nn ,.rhprp T I"nnrn;n<>t-art· y~<>r ¡¡rQ'HHl happy to share and help in any capacity. enthusiasm. I do not know how ualified I a ear to be on a er, but I would be more than "-- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS T i Department: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 T \..Jubject: Subiect Resolution 85-28 Supporting; Interim Agenda Number: GN 85-104 Improvements to the Loop 820/Airport Freeway Interchange r The Fort Worth District Office of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation has undertaken an effort to improve the traffic flow in the Loop 820/Airport Freeway Interchange by constructing a second lane along the ramp from west bound Airport Freeway to west bound Loop 820. This construction is to provide additional capacity for this ramp on an interim basis until such time as the overall redesign project for the entire interchange can be approved and constructed. r r r It is proposed that the City of North Richland Hills express its appreciation and support of this project by adopting the attached resolution. r RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 85-28 supporting the District Office in this project. r r r r i I ~ r I r Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ! Operating Budget _ r~¡'dðd¿ ~ t· Departme Head Signature ,- CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡Cf1/~ City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 85-28 '~- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS A RESOLUTION FOR THE SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REGIONAL INTERCHANGE AT LOOP 820, STATE HIGHWAY 121, STATE HIGHWAY 26 AND FM 1938: WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, working in behalf of all the cities in Northeast Tarrant County and working with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for the solution to the problems associated with the Regional Interchange at Loop 820, SH 121, SH 26 and FM 1938 has in cooperation with the District Office of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation and the Traffic Engineering Firm of DeShazo, Starek, and Tang submitted to the State Highway Commission a proposed redesign of entire interchange for inclusion in the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation 10 Year Plan and; WHEREAS, this plan identified several problem areas currently exist in the interchange at this time and; WHEREAS the most significant problem which currently exists is the back up of traffic which occurs with west bound Airport Freeway traffic exiting to west bound Loop 820 being served by a single lane ramp and; WHEREAS, the Fort Worth District Office is of the State Department of Highways a~d Public Transportation is making interim modifications to this particular ramp to improve its capacity by '- providing a second lane; NOW BE IT RESOLVED that the City of North Richland Hills supports and is in full agreement with the District Office of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation in its interim improvements to the Loop 820/Airport Freeway Interchange. PASSED AND RESOLVED this day of APPROVED: , 1985 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTORNEY '- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS y I I \ ¡ [)epartment: Purchasing 10/14/85 _ Council Meeting Date: Heavy Duty Truck With TOoLBox Body (1 each) .. Agenda Number: PU 85-32 Bid Award to Jack Williams Chevrolet ~ Subject: ì 1 I 1 I ¡ 1 I I ~ ~ I I lr~ i 1- ~ J I T I ~ ~ ì ~ ~ \ On September 24, 1985, at 10:00. a...., bids for the abovementioned item were opened and are outlined below: VENDOR EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT Hudiburg Chevrolet 1 $17,499.00 Gateway Ford ° 16,548.54 Graff Chevrolet 2 15,332.00 Frontier GMC, Inc. 2 15,246.68 *Jack Williams Chevrolet 2 15,077.00 This vehicle will be usedhy the Fire Department for1l18.intenance~f all Fire equipm.ent by "one mechanic" on cal124 hours a day. Havingthetoolbo'X body he will be able to carry a full compliment of tools and equipment for on sIte repair of Fire equipment. Jack Williams Che,vroletsttwo. (2)excep,tions are 10,500 lbs.gross vehicle weight instead of 11,000 Ibs. and 6.3 liter diesel engine instead of 6.9 liter. I researched both items care,fully.and can find no reason not to wave the exceptions and award the bid to low bidder Jâc~Wfllíams Chevrolet. Recommendation: Approy.e/ll1s,:ppro'Ve th_ purchase of one Heavoy Duty Truck with Tool Box Body from *Jack Williams Chevrolet in the amount of $15,077.00. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot Finance Review - ..!...- . Finance Director '-- , Page 1 qf 1 . ;< ," ..-,." CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS ,-~tar of the Metroplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM ~ , VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: 1 Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. Request For: Heavy Duty Truck with Tool Box Body 9101 Highway 80 West Fort Worth, Texas 76116 Bid Opening Date: September 24, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. 1 Date: 560-0500 Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. September 24, 1985 1 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041 ITEM DESCRIPTION . QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL I 1 Heavv Dutv Truck with Tool Box Body 1 Each 15.017.00 15 077.00 .. :, Per Art-""hQrl ~ . ~. ations I ".1'" . Make 1)/tj6 Chevrolet Model 1 Ton Chassis Cab / Service Body ! I CC31403 / ZW9 ! . ¡ - I - I I '-r I I ~- I .,... I ""r' I SUB-TOTAL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 15,077.00......1 TERMS Net % 20 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 60-90 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas. - ; . ~ Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive forma¡· .'-....- ' or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its Dest interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD. ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF ~ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI::i BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC. CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR. CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH. LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI. TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY' Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. . ""Dale' E. Hed~b~th - A~leet Sales Mg PHONE NUM"~ ~ ' SIGNATURE: . DATE: '7-Z4-tj) THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER I ---~. ---- --._-----.. - -- ------------~------ .. GENERAL CONDITIONS - PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. --. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS - After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. '- --~-- 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS -- Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) .Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. . 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mañager! Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) ",,"-- · . '- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Únless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. "-- GENERAL CONDITIONS '-' VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in ~tters shall be conclusive. Vendor Initial . ~ - 3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel. 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) miles. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. .'-.- This specification is intended to describe the minimum requirements for a heavy duty, dual wheel truck with a utility service body. Truck 1. Wheel Base: 160" 2. Cab to Axle: 84.0" 3. Gross Vehicle Weight: ll,aaa Lbs. IO,s-øo GVW 4. Axle, Front: 4,000 Lbs. 5. Axle, Rear: 7,000 Lbs. 6. Springs, Front: 3,000 Lbs. 7. Springs, Rear: Combined 8,000 Lbs. 8. Engine: Diesel, V-8 Design, ~iter '.Z llTI:1l 9. Transmission: Automatic 10. Steering: Power 11. Brakes: Power, Disc/Drum 12. Battery: Dual ~CCA fir, I: CCA-..1:>UA¿.. 13. Alternator: 80 AMP 14. Spot Light: Left Hand Mounted 5" or 6" 15. Mirrors: Dual Below Eye Level 16. Air Conditioning: Factory Installed 17. Interior: Vinyl, Brown or Tan 18. Exterior: Red ~S.9G--'lEnma~ N'~.-l;feKt£> 19. Windows: Tinted 20. Tires: LT215/85R-16D (7 each) 21. Heater: In Block 1800 '- YES NO ~ V' /' V- ./ V' V V V V V" v' ~- / ,.// /' V" V-- ~ /' ~ 22. Side View as Per Drawing A A. ----1 -- Œi--= 38 --- J 32 ----1-- 24 :1 ¡ I 23. Construction: All body components except treadplate, floor and channel frame are fabricated from Jalvanneal coated steel. Basic body is of welded construction. Front and rear of body are solid welded at top. Outside body surfaces are flush with no exposed edges to rust. Doors are double paneled type with inner panel drawn on a die. The paddle handle is made of stainless steel and all other parts of the lock mechanism are cadmium plated. All locks on each body are keyed alike and can be replaced. Hinge rods are 5/16" diameter, full length and are cadmium plated. Zinc hinge castings are used with nylon bushings and ball bearing rollers. Double strikers are used on all locks. All doors are sealed with an automotive type rubber sealer on four sides. Curb side horizontal doors are equipped with chains and may be used as work tables. Street side horizontal doors have rubber bumpers to protect paint finish. 24. Materials: 25. Finish: "-- Floor cross channels front and rear 4" hi x 7 ga. formed steel. Floor Cross Channels intermediate - 4" x 7 ga. formed steel. Floor reinforcing channels, three full length longitudinals 2~" wide x 14 ga. formed steel. Floor- 12 ga. non-skid steel, checker plate. Doors- outer panel 20 ga.- inner panel 20 ga. Doors reinforced with a 20 ga. hat section. Compartment sides and bottom 16 ga. auto body steel. Tops, end panels and fenders - 14 ga. & 16 ga. auto body steel. Tailgate 11 ga. formed steel, with chain covers. All bodies are steamed cleaned phosphate coated and primed with a high grade non-sanding automotive primer. All lapped surfaces are primed prior to assembly to minimize corrosion. ~/ YES NO v' YES NO /' YES NO 26. Standard Equipment: Basic Body with 11" tailgate Front panels are lowered for improved driver visibility. Material tray in right side horizontal compartment, with adjustable partitions for every other slot, slots are 4" centers. Each front vertical compartment has one adjustable shelf and one adjustable material tray. Floor cutouts and wheel housing are furnished with all dual wheel (D-Models). YES NO Eæ3 - 27. Color: Amron Red 576590 "Enmar Euflax. 28. Number of days from date of order to delivery: 60-90 ARO 29. Warranty Offered: Truck 12 months or 12.000 miles plus 12/ 12.000 on powertrain ($100.00 deductible) Body 12, months or 12,000 miles "-- , .. The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) Jack Williams Chev. Inc. complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) 2 exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. Signed Asst Fleet Sales Manager Title September 24, 1985 Date Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. Company Name THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name ',--- (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" ~ ¡ Department: Purchasin~ l~Ubject: i 1 ! I I 1 I T ~ ~~ ~ l ~ y Y SourcéofFunds: ~. ,L T CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Janitorial Services"<Award Contract to Jani-1C.$tt.g Council Meeting Date.! 10-14-85 Agenda Number:! PU 85-33 ¡ On September 24, 1985.iat .10:/00..... bids for the aboV'è mentiøned. service wer, opened and the results are outlinedbel.ow: VENDOR Cyclo Services I / EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT 0 $31, 714J 76 0 27,428~OO 0 25,000.100 0 23,400~00 0 23,244.:00 0 22,746~70 EL-Amin Enterprise Original Building Maint.nance TM& Associates Nesbitt Building Maintenance * Jani-King The Janitorial Services shall. in¢ludethe entire Municipal.iComplex and the Redreation Center on Glenview Drive. I Recommendation: Approve/nts.aJlÞ1:'~V. awarding the low bidder *Jani-King a one-~ear contract in an amount 11Ót toe~c..d $22,746.70. ---. Finance Review Acct. Number 01-20-0'5-4800 SUfflCI~S""Y ti$Þt. . Finance Director -X...- W'ttt ! ,~ Department Head $Igoatu. ... Oy COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 o~ 1 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ~tar of the 'Metroplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM ~ VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: '\ 1 JANI-KING OF FORT WORTH Request For: Janitorial Contract 1112-A East First Street Bid Opening Date: Fort Worth, Texas 76102 September 24, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. ; T Date: Requisition No. i I Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. September 24, 19851 T City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 I North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817( 281-0041 ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL - I 1 Initial Clean Up * 1 Job 2 406.70 2.406.70 v 2 Monthly Charge Each Month 1,695.00 20,340.00 ...... I * Initial clean-up to consIst of the following: strip, sea I and wax a II I hardwood and tile floors; shampoo all carpets; plus clean and deodorize all - bathrooms floor to ceiling. I - - I ...... I - I ... r 'T- r "T- , SUB-TOTAL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 22 746.70 ~ TERMS % DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DEL/VERY IN DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- _inQ Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its b..... interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF _NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI:s BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANy~~G OF FORT WORTH BY: ~ _....4z:~__--4' PHONE NUMBER: (81l) 338-1203 SIGNATURE: PATRICK Go BEACH DATE: 9-18-85 THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER GENERAL CONDITIONS ',- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: I. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the '- work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves th~ right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF 'BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: . (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) '-- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. - ",-- ',- City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tx. 76118 281-0041 Request For Janitorial Services A. Initially 1. Beginning of contract period, lobby floors to be stripped and waxed; floor to be properly cleaned and maintained throughout contract period. Contract period to be for one (1) year. 2. Floors will be dust mopped, swept or vacuumed, whichever is applicable; Council Chambers not included in daily vacuuming; all vacuuming to be done after 5:00 p.m. 3. Trash receptacles emptied; plastic liners to be replaced as needed. 4. Furniture and fixtures dusted . 5. Ashtrays and cigarette urns will be emptied, damp wiped where applicable. 6. Glass entrance doors will be cleaned and dry polished; doors and panels will be squeegee-washed as needed. 7. Emergency cleaning will be accomplished. (i.e. spillage, tracking, etc.) 8. Drinking fountains will be washed, disinfected and polished. C. Weekly 1. Low ledges, sills and rails will be dusted. '- 2. Light switches and immediate wall surfaces.will be spot cleaned if needed. 3. Break room to be mopped weekly, more often if necessary. 4. Metal 'strips surrounding entrance doors, etc. will be cleaned and polished each week. 5. Council Chambers to be vacuumed and dusted weekly prior to each Council meeting. Vendor responsibility to obtain schedule. D. Monthly 1. Carpet will be spot cleaned as needed, and regular complete carpet cleaning shall be preformed no less than three (3) times per year. Vendor shall include in his bid type of carpet maintenance (i.e. steam, chemical) and cleaning schedule. 2. Walls to be spot cleaned as needed. '-- 3. High ledges, sills, rails, molding, ducts, door frames, window frames, etc. will be vacuumed and/or dusted quarterly. 4.,Tops of book shelves in Library to be dusted. E. Quarterly 1. City Hall windows to be cleaned, both inside and out. 2. Panel walls to be wiped down. 3. Tile walls to be washed. F. Restroom Sanitation Schedule 1. Floors will be soap mopped, rinsed and disinfected. 2. Commodes, urinals and basins will be cleaned and disinfected. 3. Mirrors will be washed and dry polished. 4. Bright metal work will be cleaned and polished. 5. Stall partitions will be dusted and/or cleaned. 6. Low ledges, sills and rails will be dusted and/or damp cleaned if needed. 7. Sanitary napkin receptacles will be specially handled for cleaning, waste, disposal and disinfecting. 8. Expendable restroom supplies will be placed in the proper receptacles, such supplies to be supplied by the City. 9. Trash receptacles will be emptied and cleaned. 10. Tile walls to be spot cleaned as needed and washed quarterly. NOTE: Restroom to be properly marked when cleaning is being accomplished. G. Miscellaneous 1. Contractor will furnish trash removal bags and trash can liners. 2. Contractor will furnish all cleaning supplies. 3. The owner or a supervisor will inspect building service a minimum of once per week. 4. The price for services will not include the service of dusting books in the library. It does include dusting the top of book shelves, other high dusting and normal services. 5. Contractor shall maintain a printed work schedule that will be signed off each week and left in the Purchasing Agent's office. Failure to comply with this item shall be grounds for withholding payment. The City of North Richland Hills, Texas requires that the contractor carry Workmans Compensation Insurance and Public Liability Insurance in a minimum amount of $300,00 per incident in order to be eligible for bid consideration. ~·~·-:····'I~"',>":'.-' The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, -- on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by <a) ~ -~_ complies with all the specifications as # outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) "'-/7..-()" exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. - ~~~ Signed PATRICK G. BEACH Title Marketing Director Date September 18 , 1985 Company Name THIS ~ BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name .--- (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Purchasinp; COuncil Meeting Date: 10-14-85 Agenda Number: PU 85-34 UUbject: ~ ~ ~ I ! 1 Î ì ~ ¡ I ì..¡ The Tandum Dump will be used by the;PublicWorksDepartøep.t "Streets Repair" ánd . I "Drainage Crews". ~ L Recommendation: Appr.....jDi..å¡;¡.r¡",., ~I\e. purche...of ..C1ù4 (1) or.tub.. Dump truck . from low bidder, Frontier GMC, Inc. in the. amount of $28,326.75. ~ SOurCe of Funds: i Bonds (GO/Rev.) LOperatingBUdget I~Other Tandum Dump . Truck (leach) - Award Bid to FrQntier"GMC. Inc. On September 24. 1985, at ¡0:00a.m. bids for thø above1D.ênU:ôned item were opened and results are outlined below: VENDOR EXCEPTIONS , AMOUNT Gateway Ford o $36,363.05 Hudiburg Chevrolet o , 32.674.00 Graff Chevrolet ) 32,452.00 31.918.00 o Jack Williams Chevrolet o *Frontier GMC, Inc. o 28.326.75 finar'ICe Review Acct.Numbe( SufffclentF ¡I\al\ce Oirector COUNCIL A CTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 1, t' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS '--- £tar of the 'Metroplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: 'I ~ Frontier GMC, Inc. Request For: Tandum Dump Truck i P.O. Box 1260 l Ft. Worth, TX 76101 Bid Opening Date: September 24, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. Date: Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 a. m. Se~tember 24, 1985 l City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18 09 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: Cit Secretary Phone: (817) 281 -0041 ...... ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 Tanillll11 n11l11n 'T'r11...k 1 Each $28.326.7~ ~ Per At't'<I{'hor1 C:no{'ifir><>ri",.,,,, $28,326.75i ¡ Make rouro Model 11 .. I 'I , . i ...... - - I . , " --'- r---' '-' I SUB-TOT AL ... ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 28,326.75 TERMS NET % 20 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN l20-150 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas. - ¡~q Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- " or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its '15est interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD. ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF -- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, 'T'EXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI:s BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR. ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: Frontier GMC, Inc. BY: Marie Baldwin PHONE NUMBER: ~2048' SIGNATURE:~""'£ rATE: 9-20-85 THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER .' GENERAL CONDITIONS '-- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: I. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS - After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. '- ~ --.--. 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS ',-- Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager! Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) ',-- ~ ',-- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a lib rand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an lIequal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. - - '--- This specification is intended to describe one tandum axel dump truck equipped with a Galion 500 FDA Body and Hoist Package. I. Truck Chassis 1. Engine: 8.2 Liter 4 Cycle Turbo Charged Diesel 2. Air Cleaner: Dry Element 3. Exhaust: Dual Horizontal Stainless Steel System~/µ6l~ 4. Transmission: Clark 5 Speed 551 5. Fuel Tank: 2 Each 50 Gallon Rectangular, Mounted on R.H. and L.H. From Rail Under Running Board 6. Rear Axel: Eaton DT 341 2 Speed, 3400 Lb. Capacity 7. Ratio: 6.14/838 8. Front Suspension: 9,000 Lb. - 9. Wheel Base: 167" 102" C to A 10. Brakes: Air Assisted 11. Tires: 10:00 X 20 12 Ply (10 each) 12. Gauges: Oil, Amp, Temperature, RPM and All Standard Factory Supplied Gauges 13. Color: Silver Metallic (Dupont D.T. 1603) 14. Unit Shall Be Equippéd With A Pindal Hitch 15. Steering: Power Assisted 16. Alternator: 60 Amp /''5' 17. Battery: 12 Volt Heavy Duty b c.( ~ L..- 18. Wheels: 20 X 7.5 Cast Spoke 19. Dump Body: Galion 500 FDA with FD 63108 Hoist (16 to 23~ Ton Range) "-- YES NO /' ,/ ./ a./ ./ ~ ./ / "'-- Jr "'-- -- , . II. 1. Vendor shall furnish operator training, at North Richland Hills at time of delivery *2. Vendor must furnish maintenance manual on truck and dump body at time of delivery YES NO 3. Warranty Offered: 12 M th 1" t d '1 Chas';'l' s- P t on s, un lffil e ffil age; ~ ar s 2 -4 Honth!:!, un1i:æi t:cd :æila~c Labor 4. Total Number of Days From Date of Order To Delivery 120-150 Days ARO LV I ¿..V /!;G SUPVJLIte.b µøpJU!Þt,,- f( V ff f £., f1- ð t..~ f{2OÞ1 ? f2' )J\tøQ . Wtte~ .j The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, ,-. on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) Frcmt: ier GMC. Inc. complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) NO exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. - /tJ·/ .,' /'. \ (t (. { (. //) , , . .·:,/~.),t.CI/. " ,<. ! /1 , Signed Fleet & Municipal Sales Title Q-20-85 Date ~ront;~r ~MÇ. Tn~ Company Name THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" r r { CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Dump Trucks (3eacl1)- Bid Award to,Ja:~kWill:f.ams Chevrolet 10-14-85 COuncil Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PU 85-35 Department: ~SUbject: ! I 1 i li )R Purchasing On September 24, 1985. at 10:00 a.m., bids for th~ abóve1ne:ttt1.ønedequ1.pment were opened -- ........ ····'···.·..c and are outl1.ned below: VENDOR EXCEPTIONS UNIT COST AMOUNT i -, t t t \ *Jack Williams Chevrolet o $21,629.84 19,578.00 19,427.00 18,795..25 18,685.00 $64,889.52 58,734.00 Gateway Ford o Hud1.burg Chevrolet Graff Chevrolet o o 58,281.00 Frontier GMC o 56,385.75 56,055.00 i It .> ........ .... ... .... .............. .... .' .\. ~Ä J One dump truck w1.l1 be µ~e~b,."Park. and Recreat1.on"J)epaJ:t1l1ent, .'. Qne will be used by ,t-, '~ti1ity Department" anðj'e>4Ube:~ili.ed in the "Public Wó~fl Department. . i ...\ .. ..... . ... .......... .. < ..' i Recommendation: Approve~~i.~p~'ÇJ>V'eth..purchase of three dump trucks from the low ~ bidder. *Jack Williams ~¡.t¡>:ln the amount of $S6,OSSj,II(), It I I r ~L L 1- 01-70-01-6600 1- 01-60-04-6600 1- 01-02-01-6600 -x:-- f Finance Review ( See Above Acct. Number SUf~ld~~~. I City Manager - ------ . Finance Director ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 , .r: \ ~ CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS .> '-~tar of the MetTOplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM ¡r "' VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: 1 Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. Request For: Dump Truck 9101 Highway 80 West Bid Opening Date: September 24~ 1985 at 10:00 a.m. Fort Worth, Texas 76116 1 Date: 560-0500 Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. September 24, 1985 1 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: Ci 'V ~ -.. Phone: (827) 281-004i ......ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL i I 1 Dump Truck 3 Each 18,685.00 56,055.00 Per Attached SDecific.<lt-inn¡:: ...... .. I Make 1986 Chevrolet .. Model IU ~er~es Lnass~s Lab / uump t10ay I - Model CC7D042 I ..... L - 'T I .,- I ~~ T I I I I I r L SUB-TOTAL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 56.055.00 ~ TERMS Net % 20 DAYS F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 60-90 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- -i,.n Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its Snt interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF -NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI:S BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR. CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HI LLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. BY: Dale E. Hed eth I Asst Fleet Sales t-'1g PHONENUM ~ 05 SIGNATURE' DATE: 9 24-85 THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER GENERAL CONDITIONS '~'-- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contractt the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposalst or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called fort unauthorized alternate bids~ or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF ,BIDDERS '- (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. . 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mariager~ Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) r l \'''-- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. GENERAL CONDITIONS '-- VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the exceptions. ~ Cit~ of North Richland Hills reserves ~ right to evaluate variations from ~ specifications and its judgment in ~t;.te1:S shall ~ conclusive. Vendor Initial _ 3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a iöll tSBlt af ftiel. ~ ~c.C.C^,.c 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) milés. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. ~ NEW 1986 HEAVY DUTY TRUCK WITH A DUMP BODY ''"- This specification is intended to describe the minimum requirements for a heavy duty truck with a five (5) to seven (7) yard steel dump. I. TRUCK 1. Engine shall be a minimum of 360 C.I., V-8 gasoline powered 2. Gas Tanks: Two (2), 50 Gallon 3. Transmission: 5 speed, Manual 4. Rear Axle Capacity: f.8, S06'"'Lb., 2 Speed I 9, O(!) 0 5. Rear Spring Capacity: 23,000 Lbs. 6. Aux. Spring Multileaf 7. Front Spring Capacity: 12,000 Lbs. 8. Front Axle Capacity: 9,000 Lbs. 9. Wheel Base: 149" 10. Cab to Axle: 84" 11. Steering: Power ¡\I.'A. q~~o Ffl.o~'" AXL': 12. Brakes: Power (hydraulic)Uíth '18ettt1m-R-eeerve Ta~ 13. Alternator: %AMP 70 14. Battery: Heavy Duty 15. Gauges: Oil, Temp, Amp, RPM, all Standard Gauges 16. All Grab Handles To Be OSHA Regulation 17. Wheels: 20 x 7.5 Cast Spoke 18. Tires: 10:00 x 20, 12 Ply, Highway 19. Air Cleaner: Paper Element Type 20. Color: Silver Metallic, Dupont DT1603 21. Hood: Til t Type Pre f ered - S--rb Hcx:iD 13 1/::> A. ¡::;. 771. T ~ J::} fIt. StJ . 22. Unit Shall Be Equipped With a Pindal Hitch Dell (7Nlr YES NO 1/" V V' V- V· ~ ~ V·- .......- L-- V' V-' V-- V ~. ~ V- ~ V" V- ;..,,/ V .- II. DUMP BODY 1. Front Head: One Piece Construction 2. Horizontal U Bend Reinforcement 3. Pockets For Side Board Extensions 4. Full Depth Corner Post 5. Cross Members Lace Section On Understructure for FLoor 6. Positive Acting Tailgate Control 7. Tailgate: Box, Braced 8. Tailgate Chains: Heavy Duty 9. Metal Gauges As Follows: Floor - 10 Gauge Sides - 12 Gauge Front Headboard - 12 Gauge Tailgate - 12 Gauge Long Members - 8 Gauge Cross Members - 8 Gauge 10. Size: Capacity: 5 Yard Minimum, 7 Yard Maximum 10 FT. Long and 7 Ft. Wide Front Headboard: 29" in Height Tailgate: 29" in Height Cab to Axle: 84" Heavy Duty Hoist with Heavy Duty Acuators YES NO t/ ~ t...-/" ~' V V--' V- i.,.-/' V ¡..-/ £/'" V L--' j,./' ~ V (.../' L..--'"' L./' ~ - l ~ '- ',,- III. 1. Vendor must furnish operator training, at North Richland Hills, at time of delivery. 2. Vendor must furnish maintenance manual on truck and dump body at time of delivery. 3. Total number of days from date of order to delivery 60-90 Days Aro 4. Warranty offered: Parts Labor The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general '---,. conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) Jack" Williams Chevrolet complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) 1 exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept any and all proposals, or any part thereof. A Signed Asst Fleet Sales Manaqer Title September 24, 1985 Date Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. Company Name ~ ~ BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION '- Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" .- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS \ '. Purchasing ! I Department: l ,~ Subject: I 1 ¡ ~ ~ 'E.L. White Office Sup.plY r ~L I I L... 10-14-85 Council Meeting Date: Office Supplies - Award Contract to E.L. White Agenda Number: PU 85-36 On 'September 24,. 1985,åtl(}:()()'a..tn. bids fo·r the\>aboveD14!ìtti01ieditems were opened and the results are outlinedbel<>w~ VENDOR EXCEPTIONS 'AMOUNT 0' DISCOUNT Tarver Office Supply o 20% Central Office Supply o 32% 35% Southwest Office Supply o East Side Office Supply o ,36% General Office Supply o plus 5% 5 days 3% 10 days 2% 15 dàýs o 40% This contract will be rortity....wtdeøff:i.ce supplies,'c:opy,i.nåciline supplies and word-processing supplies~ Forty percent (40%) represents a4.iscount on all items in-the office (approximately 30,000) and not a limited few high use items. Office machines are bid on an indiv1dual,bases. supply line furniture and Reconnnendation: Approvel;n:i.sJPprÔV'eatltardingE.L.Wb:i.tea.>åhe(year contract for the purchase of office supplies. Source of Funds: Bonds· (GO/Rev.) OperatlngBudget Other -x-:- 01-00-00-0705 ~. , Finance Director ... ACTION ITEM Page 1 of r ',- CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ltar of the 'Metroplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: ""I "- Request For: Office Supply Contract Bid Opening Date: September 24» 1985 at 10:00 a.m. Date: - Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. September 24, 1985 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 - North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 - ATTN: Citv Secretarv Phone: (817) 281-0041 · . GENERAL CONDITIONS "-- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. ,~./. 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS ~ Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mariager~ . Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delay~ng or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immedi~tely give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) ',,-- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. · II) . GENERAL CONDITIONS ',- SUPPLIES I. Periodic deliveries will be made only upon authorization of the City of North Richland Hills Purchasing Agent, and shall be made if, as, and when required and ordered by the City of North Richland Hills, at such intervals as directed by said Purchasing Agent. 2. Deliveries shall be to the location identified in each order within the City of North Richland Hills. 3. The quantities shown on the bid are estimated quantities only. The City of ~¡orth Richland Hills r~serves the right to purchase more than or less than the quantities shown. In any event, the unit bid prices shall govern. 4. The contract will be awarded at the prices bid, for a period of approximately one year. 5. Bidder warrants that all deliveries made under the contract will be of the type and quality specified; and the City of North Richland Hills Purchasing Agent may reject and/or refuse any delivery which falls below the quality specified in the specifications. The City of North Richland Hills shall not be held to have accepted any delivery until after an inspection of same has been made and an opportunity to exercise 'its right of rejection has been afforded. ' 6. All mãnufacturers' warranties shall inure to the benefit of the City of North Richland Hills, and replacement of defective materials shall be ,made pr?mptly upon request. 7. Failure by the contractor to make reasonable delivery as and when requested shall entitle the Purchasing Agent to acquire quantities from alternate sources wherever available, with the right to seek reimbursement from the contractor for amounts, if any, paid by the City of North Richland Hills over and above the bid price. 8. All materials delivered shall be free of any and all liens and shall upon acceptance thereof become the property of the City of North Richalnd Hills, free and clear of any materialman's, supplier's, or other type liens. 9. Regardless of the award of a contract hereunder, the City of North Richland Hills retains the right to purchase the same or similar materials or items from other sources should it be determined that doing so would be in the City of North Richland Hills best interest, based on cost and quality considerations; however, in such event, the contractor will be given the first option of meeting or rejecting the proposed alternate source's lower price or higher quality. IO. Acceptance by the City of North Richland Hills of any delivery shall not relieve the contractor of any guarantee or warranty, express or implied, nor shall it be considered an acceptance of material not in accordance with the specifications thereby waiving the City of North Richland Hills right to request replacement of defective material. '-- The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions, and the specifications and any other conditions and the prices quoted and discount allowed for a period of one year. A. All purchases shall be discounted 40 % (excluding furniture) * B. Terms and Conditions: Net 30 days C. Supplies will be delivered within what time period - Stock items and items available from United Stationers will be next day delivery, if ordered by 3:00 p.m. D. Invoices will be submitted with each delivery yes E. Vendor must have open accounts with local wholesalers, McKesson Stationers Dist., S.P. Richards, United Stationers. Miller Business Systems Company Name Vicki Binney, Sales Representative Name and Title *A1so excluding office equipment, ie. calculators, copiers, paper folders, paper shredders, typewriters, etc. l The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, "- on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) Miller Business Systems complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) one exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. Sales Representative Title 9/12/85 Date Miller Business Systems, Inc. Company Name ~ ~ BE SUBMITTED ~ VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" r i ! l CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS r Department: Purchasing J l-Subject: ì Blazer/Ram Charger Vehicle - Bid Award to North Loop Dodge 10-14-85 Cøuncll Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PU 85-37 On September 24, 1985,bi:dsion the above mentioned item.'Wè'te.opened and the results are outlined below: VENDOR. EXCEPTION AMOUNT Graff Chevrolet o ,'. $12,224.00 Jack Williams o 12,209.00 *North Loop Dodge o 11,919.10 This vehicle will be utilize~þ.Yi1;h~ Administration ServieeDivision of the PoU.ce Department, specificallythecrimepr.evention officer·. Recommendation: Approve/bisapprove the purchase of one tamCha;tger from *North Loop Dodge, in the amount of $11,919.10. r ¡ I r T ¡ r ~ I I TL i Y f I I I '-- Finance Review Acct. Number . 01-80-02-;6600 Sufflc/en ,unds Available . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS .,- ~tar of the 'Metroplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM ( ¡ -1 VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: North Loop Dodge Request For: Blazer/Ram Charger Type Vehicle 7740 N. E. Loop 820 Bid Opening Date: September 24. 1985 10:00 a.m. Richland Hills, Tx. at N. 76118 Date: Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. September 24. 1985 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041' ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 Blazer/Ram Charper Tvne Vehicle 1 Each 11,g-I~.TC TT'919.10 -- Per Attached Specifications Make 1986 Dodge I I Model Ramcharger - - .. '- .. .. . - -- ll,919.1Œ - SUB·TOTAL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 11,919.10..;1 ;~MS % DAYS, F,O,B. CITY OF NORTH) ~HLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 90-12 ° DAYS FROM) CEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas. , Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive forma/j. or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its nterests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ~FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F,O_B. CITY OF ::¡TH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS. f..,¿J n '~ If at Chrys .IIN SUBMITTING THI:> BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC. Plan t by CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR. 10- 21- 8 S:;HASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH. LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONS'. TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT, COMPANY: North Lóop Dodge BY: W~lhy Smith, Fleet Mgr. PHON' NUMBE"!ijŽ.~184 : SIGNATURE: lIh ~~ DATE: 9-16-85 THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER This specification is intended to describe the minimum requirements for a Blazer, Ram Charger type vehicle, 2 wheel drive. ',,-- YES NO 7. Battery: 550 CCA Heavy Duty 8. Steering: Power with Cruise Control and Tilt 9. Transmission: 3 Speed Automatic 500 A lbs V8 lbs. lbs. Yes Yes mp Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 days 1. Gross Vehicle Weight: 5,300 Lbs. 5600 2. Engine: 5.2 Liter (300 CID) V-8 Design (unleaded gas) 318 3. Front Axle: 3,00 Lbs. 3,000 4. Rear Axle: 3,600 Lbs. 3,600 5. Brakes: Power, Front Disc, Rear Drum 6. Alternator: 60 AMP 10. Tires: P235/75R15 (5 each) 11. Radiator: Heavy Duty 12. Body Style: 2 Door (Blazer/Ram Charger Type) 13. Left Hand Mounted Spotlight, 5" or 6" 14. Interior: Vinyl, e ß \ lI\e. 15. Exterior: Silver Metallic (Dupont DT1603) Dodge Silver 16. Mirrors: Dual Below Eye Level 17. Air Conditioning: Factory Installed 18. Wheel Base: 106" 19. Radio: AM with Clock 20. Glass: Sun Screen, Rear and Lift Gate 21. Molding: Body Side Vinyl (color Coordinated) 22. Total Number of Days From Date of Order To Delivery 90-12 Warranty Offered: See Exhibit (/1 attached. ''''- L GENERAL CONDITIONS '-- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF ·BIDDERS '- Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation . with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mariager~ ' Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) ',.- '. '- (a) I · ~ ~ ~~ Á1~í 1 9aff POW£RTRAIN LIMITED -4RR.IU\4TY (b) , Sì l~j '. h bids have bee~ e , , If items for wh1e e uaI" desenpt10D 'A......p. co......., ",h';'.,,: " "brand name ~r q not restrict (·,.,...."...;11..................... UpOn ",Dk..ionof 'he '2 """ a b deseript1ve, but ducts ttv :12.""".. 'In... i/G, Bas..IC'Newvv. ehiCle Limited Warranty,thls P. OWertr to e ri s tics of pro . dreW.,,,,,,,, ''''.'''00'''1>0'_ ",te~ be'o", fOS Y"" 0, so.ooo "'", and characte will be conS1 e ¡.Wh.,.ì.C. heveroc.CtI,'. '3. ft~. 't..:. ThIS.Powertra¡n t;mitðd War. fnntJr.¡$ sUbJect t< " uaI" p rodue ts he b ids and '~'''~''"''''b'' '0'...., '.D'" >I'it" ",: ' eq iden ti Hed in t. respec tA, ,..... ,.",. fe,,,, ,"Ft"" R..." p,,"'....... mea"" !be II,,,, '''' clear 1 y 1 in all mate naI I' ''''~''Dof '''h",',o;;~~!'''':'fO~ '''''!ebyo. .~?"'''Ct?''.){ to be equa ¡Co""''''..n Co"e"':~"'n '. "'"" '" '." .. ced I 'ndicat,. re f eren '. dder clear y 1 ,. '.", ..............""'..... ... """"", "-., ,. FI.... l..., UnIe ss the b1 h . s bid shall be a........." ......, '.... ._,...... JlIn.,. .."',.., .""n ."""'0' " aI" p rodue t , 1 . the Invita t 0'",. 12_,""..... m~ 80010 N"" ....... ...".. W ......." th. equ f ereneed 1n p.....,..", "'_ eo_ _on..". """ ....w '0" "'0.... 0' produe t re 2',..., "'''''' ""_.._ II".. Thb ._~,.", limit,. "''''''''y!, 'Ob~ -..,... ""-b "'''''''0''' , , , " ' srEAA/SO,.......~ CO""'NENTO '" . ! ......... CYlin.,., b",~ ..~ '"'nto",,, Pa"" ",,,..., bo". "'."'bli", i 00".'001;".,.. Ç""i~Oil D.n, ""'i,. .ea, d""" """, andl."h~", ' '''d'"""" 011 .U"'.; 10,... an. 0".." ."';'O'd" ...., """'D "d i boo~n.,.u_",.... ~OU"'g, .... "'''n" p»" .... '"'boeb".,,, ' ! w""..". "'...at/a...... and "'b '0' "",. '."'Pc.enla.., " , ' ""'-'.-,.,........c-.. ,C'''' 'nd '" ''''0",.' D'o" Oil pen, ' I To,.,. .""..~., wit" ...~..'~.. go.r, Ft" D'''., e." "".".., ' i PI"."oo" a",.., .,.,..... '0' "..", Com"""",,,. ' """Wb." 0o.. .. r..",,,,,.. oa,. "d """,,,,,, ""0" 0'' D'" "'d dlll"."'i" "'.r, T °"'00 CO.,."., and d'i.. DI"o w'th """,, "~nO .ear, "01' bOO~n,,, Flyw...." D,"", "'N ""'mh!i,,,, U'i,.~., iOi,", ho""" 211d boots; G;¡sketa .and seals fOr list{'d comp':rl('nts. 0",. Sb.WC"", A'Ia(., - e_ ,.. . Wb.." O,~. .. C'''' 'haN ""mbly 1"0'" 'nd '0"', U"..~" jo'n" <nd 'Ok., 0".. "'" ''''',, b·"'n,,, A"o hOO"n. an. .11 ''''..n" Da"~ O".on",,, hOO".9; ""mb'y¡ A". 'b'N, "d 0>,. 'bon "''''0'' G",oI' on" '.'" fo' , Ii"", 0"," Don'n ". '. ; TIll, w''''''1y .0"" "D"~ m'de _e,,,,,, duo 10 Od."« 'n "'.t",,, j 0, WO""'''''hlD. " eDDIi.. '0 C,,,,,,,, ""'CI.. ''''''''e,," i, 10. 50 , Unli.d .'"'' '''d nO'm."y 0D.",,,, In 10. 50 Unile. 0'''''.0' CO""., II Th', w'''''''YdO", nO"im'"he 'e,,,,. "d cOnditio", 0' 0"" w"""'i" II '.:ontained in this bOOklet, , I WNAn. NOT COV'REO ! I 'hi, W""'>nt, do" no, "''"' ""y It,", """" UOd" 'Wb" " No' :, C"""d" in Ii, "M', N", d'bic', 1.1"'''.0 W",,,,,y : i OWN'.'. A'SpONO'.'l'TY , I To obi". """c. "'de, 'bi, "'''.nly. ",. You, "h'", '0 yoo, "'iing / I d,,'.,. y O">co" Ie", '0," '"0,"" cO""d U'd,,,,,., w"'MIy i, lim iI'd , 'I 10 Ih," 'D"'Ii'd "'dUct'b', '0' 'eo" 'eD'" ""I. ¡ THE "VI"e" TEe,..,. STATED '" THe 5Aè"" ,'''W VEH'CI.E ' , , '.ì ..~, :- · " '-- GENERAL CONDITIONS VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment i~~ matters shall be conclusive. Vendor Initial ~~~ r 3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel. 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) milés. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. . . . The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, "--- on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) North Loop Dodge complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) None exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. by Smith Fleet Manager Title 9-16-85 Date North Loop Dodge Company Name THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" I 1 ¡ L ~ I 1 ~ I T ¡ i ì T ! CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Purchasing 10/14/85 Council Meeting Date: AgendaNumber: PU 85-38 Subject: Full Size Marked P01tce Units (7 each)- Bid Award to.JackWill:1.åms Chevrolet On September 24, 1985 at 10:00a..m,bids for the above mentioned item were opened and are outlined below: VENDOR EXCEPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Graff Chevrolet 0 $11 ,630.00 11 ,428.00 11,358.00 11,357.00 $81,410.00 79,976.00 Meador Chrysler Plymouth 0 *Jack Williams ChryslerlJ:ymouth 0 79,506.00 l r ~- r- ! T ~ ~ ¡ r r ¡ r I r r- Jack Williams Chevrolet 0 79,499.00 These vehicles will be used by the u.niformed Patrol Bureau at the Police Department to effectively service the cOtmnunityan~provide dependable, .safeEmergency equipment for the Patrol officers. The cost difference of $1.00 between Williams ChevrQlet.nd<Williams Plymouth dcpes make the Chevrolet the low bi~vehicle.Bo".ever, there would be a large additional cost of change over from our present Plymouth to the Chevrolets, ·i.e.. .. (F1;ont Bumper Push Bar, Inside Prisoner SeparatiQt1Cages) and. by buying the Plymouth we are able to use our present equipment. Recommendation: Approve.lÐisapprove,the purchase of 7 marked units from Jack Williams Chevrolet, in the amount of $79.506.00. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other -r- Acct. Number SUffIClen~~~~ _ City Manager CITrCQUNCIL ACTlQN·'TEM 01-80-04-6600 - ~. Finance Director Page 1 of 1 " '" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS '\t '- ~tar of the 'Metroplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM ( VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: Request For: Full Size Marked Police Units WILLIAMS CHRYSLER· PLYMOUTH, INC. Bid Opening Date: September 24, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. 1 9101 Highway 80 West - 560·0500 Date: FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76116 Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 a. m. September 24, 198 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 T North Richland Hills. Texas 76118 ATTN:Cit, Secretar17 Phone: (817) 281-0041' ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL T J 1<',,11 <:-r'70 - P....1-r,,"" TT....¡..., 7 F..<Irh ! $11.358.00 $79.506.00 I . Per Attached Specifications ., I Make 1 Q8,ç PT .YMOU'T'H Model GRAN FURY I I - r I L - - .-..- - ..... f- SUB-TOTAL \ ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ~ 1 TERMS NE.'l' % 20 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH ICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN DAYS FROM "CEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- ìñ"g Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- tir . to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its .......nterests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ) FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF I'roRTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC. CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY, WILLIAMS CHRYSLR~ PtyMOUTH BY: RAY C. MYERS PHONE NUMBER' 560-0500 SIGNATURE, :v.¡;yy¡,& ........ THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER ' DATE: 9-24-85 - \' "- ," GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for .... opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, . :.. the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may' be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things. true and accurate and' free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. ..~ ." ,. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all'proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids~ or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reason~, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. '> - , 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF ·BIDDERS -- (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mariager~ ' Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) -. " (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. . , " '- GENERAL CONDITIONS VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specific~tions, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in~ matters shall be conclusive. Vendor InitialJ:il:ÿ)I1AÚ r¡Ýt.~ The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel. 3. 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) milés. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. - . '- " I. Vehicle - Full Size 1. Wheelbase: 112" Minimum 2. Overall Length: 205" Minimum 3. Overall Width: 74" Minimum 4. Wheel Tread: Front - 60" Minimum 5. Wheel Tread: Rear - 60" Minimum 6. Headroom: Front - 39" Minimum 7. Headroom: Rear - 37" Minimum 8. Leg Room: Front - 42" Minimum 9. Leg Room: Rear - 36.6" Minimum II. Chassis 1. Heavy Duty Police Front and Rear Springs 2. Heavy Duty Shock Absorbers, Front and Rear 3. Heavy Duty Front and Rear Suspension 4. Heavy Duty Anti-Sway Bars, Front and Rear 5. Heavy Duty Wheels, 70 x 15 5 Lug 6. Complete Factory Undercoating 7. To Have H.D. Front and Rear Brakes with H.D. Disc Brakes on Front. Brake Booster To Be Extra Heavy Duty with Dual Master Cylinder and Equipped With Warning System In Instrument Panel. ' III. Engine and Transmission 1. Engine To Be Police Heavy Duty Type. To Have Special Heavy Duty Crankshaft and Valve Train Components in Addition To Other Special Components Designed For Sustained High Speed Pursuit Application. 2. Engine To Have A Minimum Rating of 300 Cubic Inch Displacement, Rated At 165 Net Horsepower At 45 RPM 3. Engine To Be Equipped With A Four Barrel Carburator. 4. In-Line Fuel Filter (accessible from engine compartment) NON COMPLIANCE IN COMPLIANCE /' / / / v ,/ I / / /' , /' /' / / ~ ./ / ,/ /' / ,/' \/ " Non Compliance 5. Factory Power Steering ~ 6. Factory Air Conditioning, Heater and Defroster with High Speed Compressor Cut Off Circuit 7. Dual Exhaust (if available from manufacturer) 8. Transmission To Be Automatic, Heavy Duty, Three Speed, Low Speed Lock Out. IV. Cooling System 1. Radiator To Be Heavy Duty with Maximum Capacity Offered By Manufacturer 2. System To Include 5 or 7 Blade Fan, Fan Shroud, and Clutch 3. System To Be Equipped With Sealed Coolant Recovery System 4. Engine Oil Cooling Unit 5. Transmission Fluid Coolant Unit 6. Silicone Radiator and Heater Hoses 7. All Hose Clamps On Engine cooling and Vehicle Cooling System To Be A Positive Closure Type, To Hold Hoses Securely In Place and Position Under High Pressure and Rough Road Conditions. The Clamp Shall Consist of Stainless Steel Band Having Slots and Worm Screw Drive To Permit Tighting and Reuse V. Electrical 1. Alternator To Be Nominal 12 Volt, Heavy Duty 110 Amp, With "Built In" Silicone Rectifiers Transistorized Regulator. Dual Belt Driven. Output At Engine Idle Speed To Be 50 Amperes By SAE Recommended Method SAE Rated and Minimum As Measured 2. Alternator Must Have Fusible Link Or Equal Safety Device In Charging Circuit 3. Battery To Be Nominal 12 Volt, 500 Ampere Heavy Duty - Maintenance Type 4. To Have Special Suppresser Spark Plug Wiring and Wiring Brackets 5. Ignition Coil Must Be By-Passed To Ground With At Least .5 MFD 100 Volt Capacitor IN Compliance ,/ i / ( / I / / /- // '/ .// / / / / /F/'/ / / , / / / / .,' 6. Quartz Halogen High Beam Headlights '- 7. Trunk Compartment Lamp 8. Under Hood Lamp 9. Extra Dome Lamp Forward Mounted, Separately Switched 10. Dome Light Door Switch Control Deactivation 11. Spotlight Unity No. 225 (or equal) 6" (15.24 cm) Clear Lens 12 Volt, For Current Model Automobile. To Be Equipped With Aircraft Landing Light Quartz Halogen Type Bulb. To Be Mounted On Left Side of Windshield Post Spotlight and Outside Rearview Mirror Must Not Conflict. Spotlight Control Handle and Steering Wheel Must Not Conflict. 12. To Have Dual Horns 13. Factory Installed Push Button AM Radio With Digital Clock 14. "Radio Bounding" Kit To Body VI. Body 1. To Be Four Door Sedan 2. Color: Top, Supporting Post, Hood and Trunk Lid To Be Burnished Silver Metallic Dupont DT1603. All Other Exterior Surfaces To Be Painted Navy Blue Metallic DT8834 In Color. (Vendor's responsibility to verify color and color codes)~~ Initial , I \. 3. To Have External Chrome Moldings That Are Standard Equipment On Delux Model Vehicles. To Have Vinyl Inserted Body Side Moldings. Moldings To Be Of Rivet On Type 4. To Have Remote Control Outside Rearview Mirrors On Right and Left Sides Adjustable From Driver's Seat 5. Windshield and All Windows To Be Fully Tinted 6. Inside Mounted Rearview Mirror Suspended From Above, Free of Vibration, and Mounted At A Height and Position To Provide A Combination of Best Rear and Forward Vision. To Be Adjustable For Day/Night Driving. To Be Glareproof and Free of Optical Distortions Non Compliance In Compliance / /' ,/ //' /- ,/ / / /'~ / / \I .r- / / // / ,I /' / ! .' .. "--- " VII. Interior 1. Interior Trim Including Seat Covering To Be Cloth and Vinyl Color Coordinated With Exterior Colors 2. Floor Covering Must Be Carpet With Drivers Side To Have A Vinyl Insert 3. Front Seats Must Be Bucket Type (40/40) 4. Rear Seat Bench Type, Heavy Duty I=- 0 ( eo .d: r ð h Þ ~'f (' "... q s t\ d.d f i (. '$ I {;.;¡ cdl 5. Tilt Steering Wheel 6. Armrests on All Doors 7. Covering for Luggage Compartment To Be Vinyl or Rubber 8. To Have Pop Out Cigar Lighter and Ash Tray Within Drivers Reach VIII. Equipment 1. Five GR70 Police Special High Speed Textile Cord Radial Black Sidewall Tires (steel not acceptable) 2. Jack, Handle, Lug Wrench 3. To Have Heavy Duty Intermittent Variable Speed Windshield Wipers 4. Certified Speedometer As Offered In Police Equipment Package 5. Remote Control Trunk Release Within Drivers Reach 6. Full Instrumentation, Oil Pressure, Temperature, Ammeter Gauges 7. Fast Idle, Manual Locking Type Throttle Control Within Drivers Reach 8. "Single Key" Fleet Keying (Universal Key) Non Compliance Stee í !3eited In Compliance // / V /- / /' / ,,/ '/ ,/' // ,/ /J /'-/ , / I I .' '- IX. Each car(s) delivery will be checked for completeness at the point of specified delivery by a City designated representative before acceptance. X. Warranty Offered: , ,,_ I"'" c." / I L '-J 0 i~ M. i,:J 'ì (Any warranty exceptions, limitations or exclusions must be noted) Location warranty work to be performed: Î1 ~ f'1 ~:> '1 ! ' ". ~ ( ( I..,. f Vendor must be able to insure that all Police vehicles will receive priority status for repair. JO~~ Initial _ XI. Total Number of Days From Date of Order To Delivery (:·o-().) .' ~ .~ The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills. on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. Signed Title Date Company Name THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION --- - Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" I 1 l Department: I ,. Subject: ~ í I I ~ i 1 I I 1 I 1 ~ I 1 i CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Purchasing 10/14/85 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PU 85-39 One Full Size Vehicle~ Bid Award to JackWill:J.áms Chevrolet On September 24, 1985, at 10:00a,.mbids for the above ntentioned item were opened and are outlined below: VENDOR EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT \ I Hudiburg Chevrolet Graff Chevrolet o o 1 $10,549.00 10,330.00 *Jack Williams Chevrolet 10,117.00 Graff Chevrolet, the low biddertbidabench/seat and ourspeci~ications required a 55/45 seat or equal. This isan/e.bso,lute must due to this<vehicle being for the Chief of Police. We must be abletoinstàll a Police radio and Cellular car phone. This is an item that cannot bee1(empted. Recommendation: Approire/Dise.pprQve the purchase of one (1) Full Size Vehicle f~om *Jack ~ Williams Chevrolet in the amount of $10,330.00. 1 ) I 1 ~ [ 1 ~ I ~ L ¡L ~ Finance Review -x--""" 01-80-01-6600 , Finànce Director Department He;¡crSigâture CITV,COONCI L ACTION ·,TEM .. ~ City Manager L Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS -'- itar of the MetToplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM r SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: "' VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. Request For: Full Size Sedan 9101 HIghway 8D. West September 24. Fort Wovth, Texas 76116 Bid Opening Date: 1985 at 10:00 a.m. 1 Date: 560-0500 Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10 :00 a.m. September 24. 1985 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 1 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ¡ ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041 ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 1 Full Size Sedan 1 Each 10,330.00 10,330.00 I Per Attached Specifications , 1 I Make 1986 Chevrolet Model Caprice Classis 4 Door Sedan IBN69 T I T I - T I I I I I I , I , I SUB-TOTAL I ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID lU,))U.UU ~ l TERMS Net % 20 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 60-90 DAYS FROM ~ECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- ng Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formal i- or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its ",-, interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ,D FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF 10RTH RICH LAND HILLS,TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI~ 81D, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BIND.ING CON-TRACT. Ch 1 t JaCk Wllllams evro e , Inc. COMPANY: BY: Dale He eth PHONE NUMB SIGNATURE: 9-24-85 THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER GENERAL CONDITIONS '- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: I. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS '-- Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager. , Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) - "- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. ,- ""-, GENERAL CONDITIONS VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment ~~matters shall be conclusive. Vendor Initial ~ 3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel. 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) milés. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. ',- This specification is intended to describe a "4" door vehicle equal to or exceeding the following specification. 1985/1986 acceptable. These specifications represent the minimum requirements. I. 1. Wheelbase: 115" 2. Engine: V-6 L/.. '3 ~Liter 2 BBL Gasoline 3. Transmission: Automatic U/O~~rdrive (1) AJ A /AJ FrH V" 4. Tires: P215/75R15 (5 each) 5. Battery: Heavy Duty 6. Radiator: Heavy Duty 7. Brakes: Power Disc/Drum P :to51'1S~ IG' :s~1AJ 8. Body Style: 4 Door 9. Mirrors: Dual Below Eye, Remote Control, Left & Right 10. Air Conditioning: Factory Installed W/EI~~tIðI,i~ Tð~ch Climate Control 11. Molding: Protective, Body-Side, Color Coordinated 12. Radio: AM/FM Stereo/Clock 13. Seats: Cloth 55/45 or Equal 14. Wipers: 2 Speed With Low Speed Delay 15. Steering: Tilt With Power and Cruise Control 16. Odometer: Standard With Trip Indicator 17. Carpet: Front/Back With Carpet Savers 18. Trunk: Electronic Lock Release 19. Maintenance Manual Supplied With Each Vehicle 20. Total Number of Days From Date of Order To Delivery ft:;ð-Cf'e> YES NO v V V' V" V V " V V V v/ V' /' V ~ V /' /' V V - '- If bidder is bidding a vehicle that is in stock, color will be chosen from available stock. If bidder is bidding a vehicle that will be factory ordered, color shall be Silver Metallic with Blue interior. Bidder must hold an in stock vehicle until purchase is approved by the Council of the City of North Richland Hills. Approximately 10-15 days. II. Warranty Offered 12 months or 12,000 miles plus 12/ 12,000 on powertrain ($100.00 deductible) _ - · . .- The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, "--- on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) Jack-Williams Chev., Inc. complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) None exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. Signed Asst Fleet Sales Manaqer Title September 24, 1985 Date Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. Company Name THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION --- - Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" ~ ' ¡. Department: ~ Subject: ~ I ~ I 11 1 I .1 i 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ L ¡\- ~ L. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Purchasing ¢ouooll Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PU 85-40 S-10 Type Pick Ups (6øs..) _ Bid Award to FrontierGKC'.<Inc. On Septembe'r 24. 1985 at.10:00ä"m.b:1.ds for the above mentionød item were opened and are outlined below: VENDOR EXCEPTIONS UNIT PRICE AMOUNT North Loop Dodge 5 $8,649>.89 $51.899.34 Hudiburg Chevrolet o o 8,289.00 5 @ 8,057.00 1 @ 8,227.00 7,899.00 7,891.66 41,445.00 Graff Chevrolet Jack Williams Chevrolet o o 48,512.00 47,394.00 47,349.96 *Frontier GMC, Inc. Two (2 ea.) will be used'byPlannlng.artd Development Building Inspections "Replacement", one (1) is for Buildinglnsp~tions"!4ew Position, one (1) for Building Inspections "New Position, Code Enforcemel1t.u,one{l) for UtilityServ1ce''MaterReader'' and one (1) for Fire Administration "Re.p¡ace1Jténtu. Recommendation: Approve!DisaPPì'Qye the purchase of six (6) S-10Pick Up Trucks from low bidder *Frontier GMC, Inc. in tb.eå,.ount of $47,394.96. 1- 01-90-01-6600 1- 02-20-02-6600 4- 01-30-02-6600 .·Flnance·Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other --r- Acct Number SufflclentF. dsAvaUabte ì SaeAbove - , Finance Director CIty COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 /" CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS "-- Star of the MetTOplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: '\ 1 Frontier GMC, Inc. Request For: S-10 Type Pickup P.O. Box :L260 Ft. Worth, '.j:'X 76101 Bid Opening Date: September 24, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. 1 Date: Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 a. m. September 24,1985 T City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 28 1 0041 --,--ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL I 1 S-10 Type Pickup C:;1"ør 5 Each $7,891.(6 Per Attached ~T'\Q,,4f; .... '-- $39,458.30 -. Make GMC I Model TS10603 2 $-10 TVDf> 1';,,1-,m Rør1 1 Each $7,891.66 $7,891.66 "T'" Per Attached SDecification~ I Make ~Mr T Model TS10603 I - .,... I ï I T I I I I I r I SUB-TOT AL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID $47,349.9 TERMS NET % 20 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 60-90 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- -' 'Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- ,,-' or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF -,'IJORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: Frontier GMC, Inc. BY: Marie Baldwin PHONE NUMBER: 817-626-8291 SIGNATURE:~Á1";~ C-!.~'~~DATE: 9-19-85 THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER ¡,\. .-.,-. GENERAL CONDITIONS ""-- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasonst for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. ~ ------- 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS "- Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c).Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation 'with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mañager! Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in ~ny way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) "-' '-- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. '-- GENERAL CONDITIONS VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. Vendor Initial ~~ 3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel. 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) milés. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. ---------- ',- This specification is intended to describe the minimum requirements for a half-ton (~) Pick-Up Truck that is equal to or exceeds a Chevrolet S-10. ---'------ I. YES NO 1. Cab Type: Conventional ./ .I .I .I 2. Payload Capacity: 1500 lbs. 3. Engine: V6 2.8 Liter 4. Front Suspension: 2500 lbs. 5. Rear Suspension: 2600 lbs. 6. Steering: Power, Factory Installed 7. Transmission: Automatic 4 Speed ~ / 8. Tires: P195/75RI4, 5 each 9. Rear Bumper: Step Type, Painted 10. Gauges: Voltmeter, Temperture and Oil Pressure 11. Paint: 1 Color, Red Amron 576590, "Enmar Euflax" 12. Battery: Heavy Duty 13. Radiator: Heavy Duty 14. Alternator: 55 Amp, Heavy Duty :Sf:, IJM~ / 15. Brakes: Power, Disc/Drum / 17. Wheel Base: 108 Inches 108.3 16. Body Style: Fleet Side 18. Rear Axle: Standard Gear Ratio ./ 19. Left Hand Mounted Spotlight 20. Knitted Vinyl Trim Interior ./ 21. Cab Heater and Defrost System 22. Dual Below Eye Swivel Mirrors 23. Air Conditioning: Factory Installed II. '- Warranty Offered 12 Months - 12.000 Mjles Total Number of Days From Date of Order To Delivery 60-90 Days ARO .'.- '--- The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) Frontier GMC, Inc. complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) NO exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. ~~ Signed Fleet & Municipal Sales Title C}-]C}-RS Date Frontier GMC, Inc. Company Name THIS ~ BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION ~ Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" " " GENERAL CONDITIONS ',-- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and'free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF 'BIDDERS '- Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mariager~ Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) "- "- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. ""- GENERAL CONDITIONS VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right !£ evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. Vendor Initial ~ 3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated. adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel. 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for paym~t shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) miles. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. ',- This specification is intended to describe the minimum requirements for a half-ton (~) Pick-Up Truck that is equal to or exceeds a Chevrolet S-10. I. YES NO 1. Cab Type: Conventional 2. Payload Capacity: 1500 lbs. 3. Engine: V6 2.8 Liter 4. Front Suspension: 2500 lbs. 5. Rear Suspension: 2600 lbs. / ,/ J j J j J /, 6. Steering: Power, Factory Installed 7. Transmission: Automatic 4 Speed 8. Tires: P195/75RI4, 5 each 17. Wheel Base: 108 Inches IO~.~ j / / j j j j ) J ) ) J J J J. 9. Rear Bumper: Step Type, Painted 10. Gauges: Voltmeter, Temperture and Oil Pressure 11. Paint: 1 Color, Silver Metallic, Dupont 1603 12. Battery: Heavy Duty 13. Radiator: Heavy Duty· 14. Alternator: 55 Amp, Heavy Duty 5(P f1I4P 15. Brakes: Power, Disc/Drum 16. Body Style: Fleet Side 18. Rear Axle: Standard Gear Ratio 19. Left Hand Mounted Spotlight 20. Knitted Vinyl Trim Interior 21. Cab Heater and Defrost System ',-- 22. Dual Below Eye Swivel Mirrors 23. Air Conditioning: Factory Installed II. \--- Warranty Offered 1? Monrhs - 12,000 Miles Total Number of Days From Date of Order To Delivery f\O-qO n;:¡ys ARO ',- The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, ~'- on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by . (a) Frontier GMC, Inc. complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) NO exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. ~A: ~L Signed Fleet & Municipal Sales Title 9-19-85 Date Frontier GMC, Inc. Company Name THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION --- Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name "-- (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" - ,l 1: . l)epartment: ']. Sui)Ject: -" " '" ' '~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Purchasing ,., ' ,: 10/14/85 Council Meeting Date:; PU 85-41 oPiened and AMOUNT .~ ~ L *Jack Williams Two of the full size four will be used· for In addition to the abo increase the quantity fiscal year budget. authorized position !'C later in the fiscal y~ beneficial to purchase 'Ug Agent be allQWéd to ka are in the 8~/86 èement and onel for new duled to be puirchased would be more' Recommendation: Approv. Chevrolet in the total 4- 02-11-01-6600 3- 02-11-04-6600 2- 02-11-02-6600 . Source of Funds: .) t . Finance Director Page 1 ~f 1 , I! ) '. f .1 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS _ .ßtar of the'Metroplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM r VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: ... 1 Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. Request For: Full Size Pickup 9101 Highway 80 West Fort Worth, Texas 76116 Bid Opening Date: September 24, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. 1 Date: 560-0500 Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. September 24, 1985 1 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041 ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL I 1 Full Size PickuD Truck 6 Each 9,047.00 54,282.00 .. í .. Per Attached Specifications I Make 1986 Chevrolet -T Model 1/2 Ton Pickup CCI0903 - E63 I : .. I I i I ,- I 'T I T I T I T I T I SUB-TOTAL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. , TOTAL BID 54,282.uO ~ TERMS Net % 29 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 60-90 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- - i"" Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF -NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI:S BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI. TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: Jack Williams CheN. Inc. BY: Dale E. Hed peth A t Fleet Mgr PHONE NUMBE 560-0 0 SIGNATURE: DATE: 9-2- THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER · , GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for .' _ opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. -.---- 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF 'BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) -Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT -- The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) -- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Únless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. ~- GENERAL CONDITIONS VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of ~ Richland Hills reserves the ri ht to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in matters shall be conclusive. Vendor Initial 3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel. 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) miles. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. This specification is intended to describe the minimum requirements for a half-ton (~) Pick-Up Truck that is equal to or exceeds a "C-10 Chevrolet". 1. YES NO 1. Cab Type: Conventional 2. Gross Vehicle Weight: 6100 lbs. 3. Engine: 300 cu. in. V-8 Equipped to Operate on Unleaded Gas ~ 4. Front Suspension Capacity: 2950 lbs. v V ~ 5. Rear Suspension Capacity: 3750 lbs. 6. Steering: Power, Factory Installed 7. Transmission: Automatic 3 Speed 8. Tires: P235/75R15 5 each ¡/'" ~'I 9. Rear Bumper: STD Step Type, Painted, 6" v V'" V-' t/ ~ / V / ,V -' V' ~' V' V' V -.........., 10. Gauges: Voltmeter, Temperature and Oil Pressure 11. Paint: 1 Color, Silver Metallic 12. Battery: Heavy Duty 13. Radiator: Heavy Duty 14. Alternator: 55 AMP Heavy Duty 'GANJp 15. Brakes: Power Disc/Drum 16. Body Style: Fleet Side 17. Wheelbase: 130 to 140 Inches 18. Rear Axle: Standard Gear Ratio 19. Left Hand Mounted Spotlight 5" or 6" 20. Knitted Vinyl Trim Interior 21. Cab Heater and Defroster System 22. Dual Below Eye Level Swivel Mirrors 23. Air Conditioning: Factory Installed · . II. Warranty Offered 12 months or 12.000 miles plus 12/ 12.000 on powertrain (100.00 deductible) Total Number of Days From Date of Order To Delivery 60-90 ARO The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a)Jack Williams Chev, Inc. complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) None exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. /~, If; / Lk ¿: l~LN! - Signed Asst Fleet Sales Manager Title September 24, 1985 Date Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. Company Name --- THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" I ì 1 L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ,~ I Purchasing Department: , L \-- Subject: Authorization for Asreemant for Telecommun1cat1ons Siinaer 10/14/85 CounCil Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PU 85-42 1 Due to the dynamic.growth/ofiouT Cittand the Citizens, endoX'se1åeutof the 40 million doll.ar bond package, we8¡re..abquttoembark on a major construction program. Our telephonecommunications,s.t:e1Iat this time is at maximum c.padity. Subsequently we are in . a position to modify, .upgra<te or i. pµrchase . a new system. .. I believei t would be extremely beneficial totheCi~yøtNoTth RichlandHi1.~sto hire a professional Telecouimunication Engineertøl1t1vi",us not only ofo..r~",rrent ne.ed but our future needs, and to design theCityC)fiNorth,Richland Hills asYstêmthat we can grow into. I have spoken to numerousCøn.ê~lt:I1~t:.'/iother Cities anðCq~tiesand feel that Ben Sanford and Associates W()uldprope't.'~Yiserveour purpose (pr~}Josa.l~ttached) and in accordance with SB802, SC!c:t:t~l1il,S1.tbs,ction4 ExemptedPr~~..rement, procurements that are exempt from competitive.b~ding,"procurements for.per~~1\SlC)r professional service". Mr. Sanford~~iaiJ:'.Sistered Communication Ens~tt.erand is not affiliated with any company, agency or m~ufacturer. ' 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 ¡ I 1 I I 1- ì 1 ! Recommendation: Authori~e.th';,Pu.'t.'~ing Agent to.enter!n.~oønagreement with Ben Sanford and Associates f(nrprøfessiC)t'l4l consultation service for· . telecommunication in an amount not to exceed $IQ,~30. 1 I 1 T I T I I T ~ ~~ l \ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operati ngBudget Other ~ Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient F. n . Finance Director epartment HeådSignatu IT'COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 Ben Sanford & Associates, Inc. Telecommunications Consulting '-- October 3, 1985 Mr. John Whitney, Purchasing Agent City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. Whitney: Thank you for the opportunity to present our Proposal for Consulting Services. The enclosed agreement provides for a turn-key approach to analyzing the City's needs and assistance in selecting an appropriate system and vendor. Having worked with many cities, we at BSA understand the importance of equipment reliability and maintenance response, particularly in regards to emergency services. In addition to the references provided, you may wish to check with Parker County Purchasing Agent Mike Bedwell (817/599-6591) and City of Weatherford Finance Director Bill Davis (Ft. Worth - 441-8212). These are both current projects. Estimated time frame for Phase I is two months. for bidding and decision, and three to implementation. Phase II would be five weeks four months thereafter for We look forward to working with you and the City of North Richland Hills on this project. ~~S6~ I.'IOt WESTRIDGE DRIVE · GRAND PRAIRIE. TEXAS 75050 . 214/642-2900 ',-- CONSULTING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT. dated the 4th day of October. 1985, by and between Ben Sanford & Associates. Inc., hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT. and the City of North Richland Hills. Texas. hereinafter referred to as CLIENT. WITNESSETH WHEREAS. CLIENT is desirous of obtaining advice. counsel and assistance in the definition and solution of certain telecommunication and/or data problems it has now. or anticipates in the future, encountering; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT possesses the experience, expertise, familiarity with the industry and capacity to fulfill said need of CLIENT, and is willing to assist CLIENT as herein described for the fee set forth; NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of these premises, the mutual promises and covenants contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: I CLIENT HEREBY engages CONSULTANT for the period of six (6) months to render the CLIENT such consulting services as are more particularly described in the attached "Exhibit A", which services CONSULTANT agrees to render to CLIENT on the terms and conditions set forth and as CONSULTANT may, at its sole discretion, deem advisable and necessary with respect to the needs of CLIENT. II CLIENT AGREES to pay CONSULTANT, for said consulting services, a fee as enumerated in "Exhibit B". CLIENT shall authorize CONSULTANT to deal with applicable vendors by written Letter of Agency. III A CREDIT CHARGE of two percent (2%) per month on the unpaid balance shall be charged to CLIENT on all invoices remaining unpaid for more than thirty (30) days, and all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney fees and expenses, shall be borne by the CLIENT in the event any invoices are not paid in a timely manner. IV THIS AGREEMENT SHALL constitute the entire agreement of the parties. shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs and assigns forever, and any amendment, modification, or alteration shall be of no förce and effect unless embodied in writing and executed by the parties concerned. Signatures below must be dated within sixty days of one another. Name Date President Tl tle Title Ben Sanford & Associates, Inc. Company City of North Richland Hills Company ~ EXHIBIT A Services To Be Performed ---------------------------------- PHASE I ----------------------------------- Hours Fee I. Station Equipment A. Inventory B. Review Inventory C. Establish Files D. Tariff Analysis E. Audit Bills F. Pursue Rebates II. Station User Requirements A. Interviews B. Evaluate Interviews C. Explore Alternate Methods 10 650 20 1300 III. Toll A. B. C. D. Analysis Material Preparation Computer Time Evaluate Data Formulate Policy 12 780 ~ IV. Traffic Study/Operator Evaluation A. Order Telco Studies B. Conduct Operator and Busy Studies C. Evaluate Studies V. System Design A. Outline Departmental Requirements B. System Engineering C. Submit Design Proposals D. Prepare Bid Documents ---------------------------------- PHASE II ---------------------------------- 9 585 40 2600 VI. Equipment Acquisition 56 3640 A. Release Request for Proposals B. Pre-Bid Conference C. Evaluate Vendor Proposals VII. Approve Implementation 12 780 A. Cable and Station Equipment B. Switch and System Features C. Trunking D. Peripheral Equipment E. Training and Documentation VIII. Policies and Procedures 3 195 A. Develop Material B. Personnel Training TOTAL 162 10,530 ',-- EXHIBIT B Fee Schedule Ten percent (10%) shall be due upon signing of Contract ($1053.00). Remainder of fee shall be invoiced upon presentation of Final Report. Fee includes all expenses and a twelve-month followup for any recommended products or services. '- CONSULTING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, dated the 4th day of October, 1985, by and between Ben Sanford & Associates. Inc., hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT, and the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, hereinafter referred to as CLIENT. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, CLIENT is desirous of obtaining advice, counsel and assistance in the definition and solution of certain telecommunication and/or data problems it has now, or anticipates in the future, encountering; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT possesses the experience, expertise, familiarity with the industry and capacity to fulfill said need of CLIENT, and is willing to assist CLIENT as herein described for the fee set forth; NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of these premises, the mutual promises and covenants contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: I CLIENT HEREBY engages CONSULTANT for the period of six (6) months to render the CLIENT such consulting services as are more particularly described in the attached "Exhibit A". which services CONSULTANT agrees to render to CLIENT on the terms and conditions set forth and as CONSULTANT may, at its sole discretion. deem advisable and necessary with respect to the needs of CLIENT. II CLIENT AGREES to pay CONSULTANT. for said consulting services, a fee as enumerated in "Exhibit B". CLIENT shall authorize CONSULTANT to deal with applicable vendors by written Letter of Agency. III A CREDIT CHARGE of two percent (2%) per month on the unpaid balance shall be charged to CLIENT on all invoices remaining unpaid for more than thirty (30) days. and all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney fees and expenses, shall be borne by the CLIENT in the event any invoices are not paid in a timely manner. IV THIS AGREEMENT SHALL constitute the entire agreement of the parties. shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto. their heirs and assigns forever, and any amendment, modification, or alteration shall be of no force and effect unless embodied'in writing and executed by the parties concerned. Signatures below must be dated within sixty days of one another. ~;S'ðQ {ù+rc: . en an or Date President T1 tle Name Date T1 tle Ben Sanford & Associates. Inc. Company City of North Richland Hills Company ~ EXHIBIT A Services To Be Performed ---------------------------------- PHASE I ----------------------------------- Hours Fee I. Station Equipment 10 650 A. Inventory B. Review Inventory C. Establish Files D. Tariff Analysis E. Audit Bills F. Pursue Rebates II. Station User Requirements 20 1300 A. Interviews B. Evaluate Interviews C. Explore Alternate Methods III. Toll Analysis 12 780 A. Material Preparation B. comyuter Time C. Eva uate Data D. Formulate Policy -- IV. Traffic Study/Operator Evaluation 9 585 A. Order Telco Studies B. Conduct Operator and Busy Studies c. Evaluate Studies V. System Design 40 2600 A. Outline Defartmental Requirements B. System Eng neering c. Submit Design Proposals D. Prepare Bid Documents ---------------------------------- PHASE II ---------------------------------- VI. Equipment Acquisition 56 3640 A. Release Request for Proposals B. Pre-Bid Conference c. Evaluate Vendor Proposals VII. Approve Implementation 12 780 A. Cable and Station Equipment B. Switch and System Features c. Trunking D. Peripheral Equipment E. Training and Documentation VIII. Policies and Procedures 3 195 A. Develop Material B. Personnel Training TOTAL 162 10,530 '-- EXHIBIT B Fee Schedule Ten percent (10%) shall be due upon signing of Contract ($1053.00). Remainder of fee shall be invoiced upon presentation of Final Report. Fee includes all expenses and a twelve-month followup for any recommended products or services. :1 ~r Subject: ~ i 1 i 1 ~ I 1 1 ~ ~- ~ ¡ ì ~ ~ .~ t t~ L CITY Of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ¡; Department: Utility CQunciJ Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PW 85-22 10-8-85 TranSfer of OwnershipøfPå~t of Big Fossil Outf'¡l). Se'Wer Line and CQnstructfë»ï.ofMetering Station Our.contract with F0:x-tWorth>srates that if andw1:1ê.n.tllê.:yrèquest a metering station be installed'on.th~<FQsSil Creek OutfallSe~1:'I.,fnE!thenwe must engineer and installthie¡¡ s:t~ti9n. For the past,fewm.onthsthe staff has been meeting with thè.Cityo{Ført .Worth to trYtø'['ee¡¡oJ""e the problem of three cities being on.one o'Utfa).l sewer) line. . Th:e¡¡ugges;tión'was made that the cities involved.relÍI1<11fts~()'Wnership of the FossilÇree}tOutfal1 Sewer Line from its southe'['n.connect:(.onto the Fort Worth $eWeJ:' trunk line to North Richland Hills'southc1tylimits near Rich land Plaza. There are several ad-v;antages<to.the City of North,lUchlø.n;<iHills to give up ownership of this.+~e~Qne advantage is thatthis.t~ano1d line and is probably prettYba~lYi~etet'iorated on the south'en.d~disprobably going to require so~mai.nte~~çe, in the near future,~>A.t10ther advantage is where it passes through>thE!iC~t:y.of Richland Hillswelt~v.eto pay that city 6ç per customer per tl\onthfora.llof the customers.t~a~we't1ave ón the . line. By Fort Worth takingQYerthe01tlD.e~ship of the line.tþ'~siT!1ouldeliminate the payment of 6¢ per C\1støJnerto~c.bland Hills. 'l'hj.swoufda,1.0 put Haltom City directly into aFortWortll.line and would elimitt8:te.thenecessity for Haltom, City to pass tl1ei,ri sewagetbrough our lÍI1e.san~it.iwould help considerably to eliminate a lot..of monthly bookkeeping that we have to do at this time. However, Haltom CitYW()\1ld~til)"be tied into our lin~,jU$it Watauga city limits and.w~Wi¡lprobably transfer them over 30" outfall line coming,jfromthe city of Watauga~ south of the to our new In conjunctioIl with. ti1e-;transfê:X-0f ownership ofthi.sotttfaU. line from Rich1and Plaza south~01:1earth~Trinity River ,wE!~rê.?,ommitted to build a metering station in the area. of Grapev,ine Highwa.y and lUchland Plaza. Recommendation: The'{/iftaffre¢ø1DJlènds to approvetbe transfer of ownership of Fossil Creek Outiâ}lSewerLtne to the City of Fort Worth south from 'Richland Plaza and, toa.pprQve f~r the city engineertoengtneer the metering station on thisq.ine and receive bids on same. FtnanceRevlew \ , Source Qf'uflds: eOnds(.G~/Aev.) g=ting!I!U~ ..¡C.i/t>~i..... .......> >, ~~ :¡~j'» ....~.. .~~~ Depertment He~_. iSJ~~t"r~> ..·...i..·i . '.. Oi y Manager .. '·CITYCQf.JNCIL ACTION ITEM - Acct. Number ' Suffich~nt Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 _FORT ~ ~~'::~M~TMENT FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76101 1- I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1- ADMINISTRATION DMSION (817) 870-8220 August 14, 1985 Mr. Gene Riddle Director Public Works/Utilities City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. Riddle: REGIONAL SEWER METERING - LOWER BIG FOSSIL DRAINAGE BASIN Thank you for your letter on metering of wastewater from North Richland Hills, Haltom City, and Richland Hills. For background information, Fort Worth's relatively new Big Fossil Creek Collector was designed for uniform capacity throughout. Its primary purpose is to provide capacity in the upper reaches of the drainage basin inasmuch as the lower area was already served by the older Tarrant County Water Supply Corporation (TCWSC) sewers. As you can see any flows diverted from the older sewers to the Big Fossil Collector would reduce its use fullness in the upper reaches of the drainage basin. Certainly small, unanticipated diversions could be accommodated but the North Richland Hills and Richland Hills flows of the lower basin should remain on the older sewer main. Understanding your interests, however, we have developed an alternative which may meet several desirable objectives. Fort Worth would be willing to extend our regional wastewater authority role to include the operation and maintenance of metering stations and the billing of individual cities if the Richland Hills and North Richland Hills meters are installed on the old TCWSC sewer as previously planned. To enable us to assume this role, title and ownership of TCWSC sewer and easements from its downstream connection with the Fort Worth river outfall through Richland Hills up to the proposed North Richland Hills meter at the city limits line would need to be transferred to Fort Worth at no cost. Maintenance and operational responsibilities could then be assumed by Fort Worth with the title transfer. In addition, the existing Haltom City flow in the TCWSC line could be diverted to two metered connections on the Big Fossil Collector with our capacity charges offset by the transfer of ownership mentioned above. The suggested alternative would provide additional capacity in the TCWSC sewer because the Haltom City connections would shift wastewater from the older sewer to the Big Fossil Collector. This arrangement would also allow most of the Big F~ssil Collector capacity to be reserved for the upper drainage basin as originally planned and transfer the maintenance responsibility of the older sewer to the Fort Worth regional system downstream from the proposed North Richland Hills meter. ....... 1 Subject: 1 l l l l l i l I l 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 ì~ ì CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Engineering Services and Schedule for Streets and draina~e - Capital Improvement Projects Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 Agenda Number: PW 85-23 The Capital Improvement Program Committee met on Monday, October 6, 1985, and approved for City Council consideration the initial projects for the five year Capital Improvement Program in accordance with the attached chart and printed schedule. The Committee also proposed that the Council authorize Knowlton-English-Flowers to begin engineering on all street and drainage projects. The long lead time associated with surveying, engineering and right-of-way acquisition dictates that we begin this process immediately. The attached proposal to provide such engineering services has been received from Knowlton-English-Flowers. A thorough discussion with Mr. Dick Knowlton has provided assurance that the firm is capable of providing the required services on a timely basis. The Capital Improvement Program Committee will be provided each year with a recommended list of residential streets to be included in each years construction program, subject to City Council approval. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to contract with Knowlton-English-Flowers for engineering on all street and drainage projects. It is further recommended that the attached schedule for construction work be approved for 1986/87, to be modified in subsequent years as circumstances warrant. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other . ance Director as needed -----Ã- Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager I i 1..- 1 Page 1 of 1986 CAPITAL PROJECTS Public Buildings '-- Library/Community Center Purchase Architectural Fees/Initial Remodeling Sub-Total $4,300,000 400,000 $4,700,000 Architectural Fees for Future Construction of Fire Stations, Administrative Offices, and Training Facility 100,000 Architectural Fees/Preliminary Construction of Police Facilities 300,000 *Streets/Thoroughfares Watauga Road Engineering $408,605 Right-of-Way Acquisition 0 Construction 0 Sub-Total $408,605 Davis Boulevard Engineering 44,791 Right-of-Way Acquisition 0 Construction 0 Sub-Total 44,791 Starnes Road Engineering 114,000 Right-of-Way Acquisition 21,596 Construction 0 Sub-Total 135,596 Hightower Engineering 20,000 Right-of-Way Acquisition 2,007 Construction 0 Sub-Total 22,007 Martin Drive Engineering 15,250 Right-of-Way Acquisition 0 Construction 0 Sub-Total 15,250 Unspecified Engineering 49,931 Right-of-Way Acquisition 1,227 Construction 33,209 Sub-Total 84,367 ',,- Drainage Calloway Branch I Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total $41,544 o o Mackey Creek II Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total 83,609 o o Big Fossil Creek Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total 64,231 o o TOTAL 1986 PROJECTS *This estimate includes all associated drainage work -. $41,544 83,609 64,231 $6,000,000 1987 CAPITAL PROJECTS Public Buildings Completion of Police Facility $1,600,000 Completion of Library/Community Center 300,000 Construction of Watauga Road Fire Station 400,000 *Streets/Thoroughfares Watauga Road Engineering $41,395 Right-of-Way Acquisition 640,873 Construction 0 Sub-Total 682,268 Davis Boulevard Engineering 209 Right-of-Way Acquisition 10,000 Construction 2,186,228 Sub-Total 2,196,437 Starnes Road Engineering 0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 78,404 Construction 77 ,958 Sub-Total 156,362 Hightower Engineering 0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 7,993 Construction 113,956 Sub-Total 121,949 Martin Drive Engineering 37,750 Right-of-Way Acquisition 14,033 Construction 0 Sub-Total 51,783 Unspecified Engineering 50,069 Right-of-Way Acquisition 2,927 Construction 345,185 Sub-Total 398,181 - Drainage '---- Calloway Branch I Engineering $50,456 Right-of-Way Acquisition 2,255 Construction 0 Sub-Total 52,711 Mackey Creek II Engineering 391 Right-of-Way Acquisition 13,333 Construction 0 Sub-Total 13,724 Big Fossil Creek Engineering 24,769 Right-of-Way Acquisition 1,816 Construction 0 Sub-Total 26,585 TOTAL 1987 PROJECTS $6,000,000 *This estimate includes all associated drainage work '- 1988 CAPITAL PROJECTS Construction of Fire Administration Building $300,000 Construction of Fire Training Center 655,000 Davis Boulevard Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total *Streets/Thoroughfares $ 0 115,127 1,384, 172 $1,499,299 0 0 17,920 17,920 50,000 447,568 0 497,568 26,467 0 0 26,467 41,641 0 0 41,641 0 0 842,452 842,452 0 0 56,044 56,044 Watauga Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Precinct Line Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Bedford Euless Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Bursey Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Starnes Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Hightower Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Bewley/Onyx Drive Engineering 80,000 Right-of-Way Acquisition 59,676 Construction 0 '-- Sub-Total 139,676 Lola Drive Engineering 21,000 Right-of-Way Acquisition 19,892 Construction 0 Sub-Total 40,892 Martin Drive Engineering 0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 5,967 Construction 344,315 Sub-Total 350,282 Newman Engineering 23,000 Right-of-Way 6,889 Construction 0 Sub-Total 29,889 Unspecified Engineering 50,206 Right-of-Way Acquisition 2,935 Construction 1,304,934 Sub-Total 1,358,075 Drainage Calloway Branch I Engineering 0 Right-of-\vay Acquisition 17,745 Construction 322,112 Sub-Total 339,857 Calloway Branch II Engineering 376,912 Right-of-Way Acquisition 0 Construction 0 Sub-Total 376,912 Mackey Creek II Engineering 0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 6,666 Construction 622,177 Sub-Total 628,843 Big Fossil Creek Engineering 0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 183 Construction 799,000 Sub-Total 799,183 '- TOTAL 1988 PROJECTS $8,000,000 *This estimate includes all associated drainage work 1989 CAPITAL PROJECTS .~ Fire Station 2 Relocation $300,000 *Streets/Thoroughfares Watauga Road Engineering $ 0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 0 Construction 1,851,055 Sub-Total 1,851,055 Precinct Line Engineering 0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 2,432 Construction 0 Sub-Total 2,432 Rufe Snow Drive Engineering 150,000 Right-of-Way Acquisition 101,099 Construction 0 Sub-Total 251,099 Bedford Euless Road Engineering 26,033 Right-of-Way Acquisition 30,000 Construction 73,885 Sub-Total 129,918 Bursey Road Engineering 72,359 Right-of-Way Acquisition 83,152 Construction 0 Sub-Total 155,511 Bewley/Onyx Drive Engineering 0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 324 Construction 654,570 Sub-Total 654,894 Lola Engineering 0 Right-of-Way Acquisition 108 Construction 164,700 Sub-Total 164,808 Emerald Hills Way Engineering 19,317 Right-of-Way Acquisition 0 Construction 0 Sub-Total 19,317 -.. Martin Engineering Right-of-Way Construction Sub-Total Unspecified Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total 0 0 112,685 112,685 0 13,111 188,153 201,264 49,794 2,911 106,672 159,377 Drainage 0 0 477,889 477,889 112,088 10 ,000 3,881,834 4,003,922 291,506 0 0 291,506 0 0 104,823 104,823 264,000 30,000 825,500 1,119,500 $10,000,000 Newman Engineering Right-of-Way Construction Sub-Total Calloway Branch I Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Calloway Branch II Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Calloway Branch III Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Mackey Creek II Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Walkers Branch Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total TOTAL 1989 PROJECTS *This estimate includes all associated drainage work Bedford Euless Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total 1990 CAPITAL PROJECTS *Streets/Thoroughfares 0 0 66,883 66,883 $ 0 98,901 865,417 964,318 0 0 368,215 368,215 0 16,848 846,844 863,692 91,000 80,000 47,017 218,017 18,683 10,000 147,294 175,977 t'¡atauga Road Engineering Right-of-Way Construction Sub-Total Rufe Snow Drive Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Bursey Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Smithfield Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Emerald Hills Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Drainage Calloway Branch II Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total o o 498,581 498,581 Calloway Branch III Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total 51,494 10,000 823,232 884,726 Mackey Creek I Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total 53,000 5,000 40,173 Walkers Branch Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total o o 1,518,501 North Hills Miscellaneous Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total 33,000 10,000 23,424 TOTAL 1990 PROJECTS TOTAL 1991 TO COMPLETION TOTAL *This estimate includes all associated drainage work 98,173 1,518,501 66,424 $5,723,507 4,276,493 $10,000,000 1991 TO COMPLETION CAPITAL PROJECTS *Streets/Thoroughfares Rufe Snow Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total $ 0 0 283,227 $283,227 0 0 78,599 78,599 0 0 691,605 691,605 0 0 182,306 182,306 Drainage 0 0 9,585 9,585 0 0 2,253,768 2,253,768 0 0 432,828 432,828 0 0 344,575 344,575 $4,276,493 Bursey Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Smithfield Road Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Emerald Hills Way Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Calloway Branch II Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Calloway Branch III Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total Mackey Creek I Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total North Hills Miscellaneous Engineering Right-of-Way Acquisition Construction Sub-Total TOTAL 1991 TO COMPLETION PROJECTS ',~ *This estimate includes all associated drainage work Project Name Watauga Road Davis Blvd. Precinct Line Rd. Rufe Snow Drive Bedford-Euless Rd. Bursey Road Starnes Road Hightower Smithfield Road Bewley/Onyx Drive Lola Drive Emerald Hills Way Martin Drive Newman Drive Unspecified Calloway Branch I Calloway Branch II Mackey Creek I Mackey Creek II SUMMARY TOTALS Limits From Rufe Snow to Davis From Emerald Hills Way to Colleyville City Limits From Grapevine Hwy. to Davis From Grapevine Hwy. to I.H. 820 From Grapevine Hwy. to Airport Fwy. From Rufe Snow to Keller-Smithfield From Shady Hollow Lane to Keller- Smithfield From Meadow Road to Existing Hightower From Turner to John Autrey From Tourist to Billie Faye From Green Meadow to Scott From Davis Blvd. to Cork Lane From Cardinal to Precinct Line From Davis to Shirley Misc. Residential Streets From Glenview to North of Booth Calloway From Holiday Lane to RR From Grapevine Hwy. to Onyx S. From Harmonson to Rufe Snow Notes Includes $3,084,220 for Streets, $744,000, $392,000, $110,000, $152,890 and $25,000 for Misc. Associated Drainage Includes $1,999,148 for Misc. Drainage -- Engineering For Assessment Roll Only Right-of-way Engineering and Acquisiton Only $800,000 for Street, $284,410 and $50,000 for Misc. Drainage $859,622 for Street and $50,000 for Misc. Drainage $595,000 for Street, $34,310 and $165,260 for Misc. Drainage $177,000 for Street, $28,700 for Misc. Drainage $400,000 for Street, $48,000 and $82,000 for Misc. Drainage $887,000 plus $25,000 for Misc. $481,000 and $51,000 Misc. $731,000 and $100,000 for Misc. '~ '- Project Name Walkers Branch Big Fossil Creek North Hills Misc. Limits Notes Cardinal to Stoneybrook $997,000 + 976,000 + 615,000 and $50,000 for Misc. Bank Erosion Protection Misc. Storm Drains in North Hills Area $225,000 plus $50,000 and $50,000 for Misc. 4' . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TlNG ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas October 10, 1985 Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-200 CITY DF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS 1986-1990 CAPÌTAL IMRPOVEMENTS PROGRAM PROJECTS AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES Upon Council consideration and approval of this proposal for Engineering Services, and in accordance with the provisions of Section III, ,lI,uthorization of Services, of our "Agreement for Engineering Services" Contract, dated June 13, 1977, such action shall constitute authorization by the City Council of North Richland Hills for Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc., to perform engineering services for design and administration of the Capital Improvements Projects included in the attached tabulation. The Engineer agrees to complete the authorized services in accordance with the attached approved schedule or such schedule as may be later modified by the City Councilor Staff and agreed upon by both the City and Engineer. The Engineer is authorized to begin work on any or all projects before the scheduled commencement dates on the CIP schedule, however, the Owner is not cbligated to compensate the Engineer for work performed on specific projects until engineering for these projects is scheduled to begin. Engineering services required to be performed for this assignment by Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc., Consulting Engineers shall be as outlined in Section II, (B), (C), and (0) of our "Agreement for Engineering Services" Co~tr~ct dated June 13, 1977, and shall consist of (1) preparation of construction plans and specifications, (2) preparation of easement, right-of-way and permit descriptions, (3) coordination of the obtaining of 50il borings and foundation investigations as required, (4) preparation of assessment rolls as required, and (5) performing the construction administration along with the furnishing of support services consisting of field surveys for layout and grade control. Compensation to the Engineer shall be in accordance with Section VI, (B) and (0) of the aforementioned Engineering Agreement for each specific project included in the Capital Improvements Program. Please call if you have any questions regarding this assignment. continued, next page sso FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021·817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 ~-- ~ October 10, 1985 1986-1990 CIP PROJECTS Page 2 &aufØ ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/bvg Enclosures cc. Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assist. Dir. of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance '- .. v I ~- J l ex: I 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::it I II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q: I II 0 0 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 c ~ 0 0 111 , ..J II Õ ,.; .;. ~ ,.; In I ~ II 0 In 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ;; III I") I") 0 N 0- I") ... III I l- II In ... In In 111 ... - III I") In N 0 0- a:¡ ~ If) a:¡ .0 III I") ... III I 0 11' ~ - - - - ... - - - '" - '" - - N - ... I") ... - N - - 0- Ct- , l- II' - ... - '" - - - - ... I II I N 1 II '" Ñ I II I II 0 I l- II: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 I In II, ... ... '" '" - '" - . - '" - - - . - - - - - - ... - - I Z 11 ... , I 0 II I U I U II i ¡ 0 I II: I Q: IIi I I ' I IJ.J IIi r ..... , I Q III r 0 I Z II I 0 , I ::J II I I I I II I I") , I IIi O· 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'I") 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ..... i I IIi _. '" ,. '" '" '" ... '" 0 . ... ,III - ... '" - ì ., ., 1 l l , ') l '") } } ~ -.--. - _.i__.. } l } } l ., } ") , ., <t I II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o· 0 0 3 I II C 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c:: I II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ..J II Ö Õ Õ Ñ I <t II .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 0 ,., In I l- II 111 - In 0 ,., 0 0 - CD .0 N - N N - N - - ... N ,., ... - CD ---' CD I 0 II " ... ~ N ... - - ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ [l- I l- II ... ,... ... ... ... ... I II - I \I ... Ñ I II I II 0 I l- II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I tn II ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... I z: \I .... I 0 II. u I U II' 0 I II. I c:: II' I LLI II " I Q II 0 I z: II 0 I =:J II Û I \I ,., I II 0 0 0 - 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r. 0 ~ .... I II' ... ... .... 0 ... <:' ..., ... 0 ... OIl 0 OIl ... ... ... ... 0 0 OIl OIl .. 0 ~ LLI I II' [I- CD 0 0 0 0 0 " õ' I 0 II ai Õ añ Õ ,; I [l- II o( 0 0 0 t. I [l- II [1-, - CD - - OIl ,., Q.. t. I ... II OIl ;... ... OIl ... ... N I I II ... ~ I II LLI <t I II I II ...J .... I II' U I /I 0 0 N [1-' ... 1<# J 1 ~ . . It Lj <r: I II 0 II) 0 ~ 0 M 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 c- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 I II ... '<t '" ~ 0 ~ 0 N " 0 c C In 0 C- O 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 a:: I II ... - ..0 ~ '<t C ..0 ~"' " ..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 In- - I ..J II Ñ .; Ñ IIÍ Ö Ö ri- cD Ö Ö Õ ~ ~ .; cD I <r: II II) II) ~ ~ " M 0- M In I l- II 0 0 ~ '<t N N " M In ..0 N ~, OJ 0- 0 0- " " N '<t 0- ..0 - II) J 0 II M N ... '<t 0- 0- - " ..0 - ,.., '<t " OJ M 0 ~ ,.,. M ,.,. M '<t 0- I l- II ... ... ... ... '" '" ... '" '" '" . '" .; ,.; ... ... ... ... .õ ... I II M N ... - N I II ... ... ... ... ... ... ... N Ñ I II ... I II 0 I l- II 0 0 0 " 0 D- O 0 In 0 0 ..0 C 0 0 0 In II) ,.,. 0 0 0 In ,.., I UJ II ... ... ... N ... 0- ... ... 0 ... ... 0 ... ... ... ... OJ ..0 N ... ... .. ,.,. D- J Z II 1'1 In ..0 M In ,.,. OJ In ~ .. I 0 II ,.; Ñ ri- ,.; U I U " II) ... N '<t ..0 0 I II II) ." 0- OJ ... In M '<t ,.,. J a:: " N ¡", ..0 N '<t M N I UJ II ... .... ... Ñ ... ... " I Q " or 0 I Z " ... ... 0 I :=¡ II I I I II M I " M 0 0 " In ~ 0 0 ',.,. 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 - N M 0 0 In I II II) ... ... ... Ñ .or ... ... - ... ... 0- ... ... ... ... OJ M ,.,. '" 0 ... N OJ I II II) ~ II) 0 N In N In '<t In 0 I 0 II IIÍ ' - ~ cD Õ ,.; I 0- Il ..0 II) '-0 " M II) n L I 0- Il ..0 ..0 ..0 'It" ~ ~ 0- N '<t - N ~ 0.. I ... II '" II) M II) ... - '<t OJ ... In ... N I " '" ... .", ... ... ... I II ... n UJ I " ... .. I II' ;...J I " --- , .. w ~ ., ") ., "' . " <t I n 0 III 0 ..,. 0 F" 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 r"] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 :;t I II .... ..,. 0 ..,. 0 ..,. .... 0 N r0- O 0 0 If) 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0..:>.;:. cr: I II .... .... 0 .0 .0 ..,. ..,. 0 .0 I/') ro- .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 OOc. I -1 II a5 ,;. Ô a5 .;. ,;. ,;. .; añ r.: . a5 I <t II ..,. 0 0 - 0 N 0- 0 .... ... 0 V'J1f)0 I/') I .... II 0 k1 0 0- N F" F" 0 0 0- 0 " F" r"] 0 - a¡ M r"] r"] r"] 0- ~ if) C III I 0 II I/') N ~'1 ..,. If) .... N 0- ro- (- M I/') N 0 0- a¡ ..,. If) a¡ .0 a¡ ..,. M.oc. 0- I .... II Ñ '" '" '" II> '" '" '" '" .. Ñ '" ,.:¡ .. ... Ñ ... .. I II ..,. - ... ... ..,. - QJ C' I " ... ... ... '" .. ... ... ... ... r"]...~ Ñ I II ... .. I II 0 I II' 0 0 0 r0- O 0- 0 0 Þ1 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 If') a¡ r0- O 0 0 If) F" I II' '" .. ,'" N '" 0- '" II> 0 II> '" 0 '" '" '" '" C) .0 N .. .. ... " 0- f " N I/') .0 M If) " III If) ..,. ..... I II, ;Ñ ,.:¡ .;. .õ u I II' M ce .... 0- N 0 I II, ce r0- O- ce '" 11"1 r"] ..,. r0- t II: N '" .0 .... N ..,. r"] N I W' '" '''' ,,,, ... .. ro- I n, N ..,. 0 I II; '" .. 0 I " I I II M I II M 0 0 ce If) N 0 0 r0- O 0 " 0 0 0 0 .... .0 r"] 0 - 0 If) "0 C. I II' ce II> ,'" - 0- ... ... .... ... ... ro- '" ... '" '" a¡ N " .. 0 '" N C... C I II ce M N .0 0 '0- k1 " If) ..,. 11"1 C '0 I 0 II .õ ,.; .; a5 .õ I 0- Il: ..,. III III If) ce III r"] O' L I 0- Il .0 .0 .0 .0 ... " 0- ce 0- .0 N 0 Il. I ... II '" 0- r"] ce N .... ..,. ce ... n ... r0- O I II '" ... '" '" '" '" '" .ñ I II - 0 W I II '" .. - I II .. ,-1 I II --1 I ) 1- -... c:r 3 a: I I I I I I I , I 1 I , I I I 1 I I I I , I : 1 I I I I , I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I , 1 i : E: , I c:r I UJ I ..J.a: 1 ..J 1 ....[!) 1 I I a I o I Zex: I c:r In I ..J~OIllI I 0-....1 U 0-01 ..... -ZI O::UJ I I I 1 II- I I- ..oln. O::ZCD I CO-lli I ZLU__I .01 r¡¡ I 1-, , I I I I 1 I I I I I , , I , I , I I I I I , 1 I I I I I ; I , I I I , I I I , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II " II II '" II· IIi II' II' II, " II II II II II' II II II II II II II II 'I II il: II' ", II II' II II II II n; II II II II· II' II II II II II II II " II UJ II ILl II I- II C II Z II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II " II II II II II II " II " " II Z II a II ... II I- " ~ II ... " 0:: II U II UJ " ILl II e " II I- II U II UJ II .., II C II 0:: II ~ II II " ~, CD 0- ... N o .... U C ,... o o 1 M õ' I.. ~ 'UJ -I ::I e ·w J: U UJ an I.. III III c: ... en e: w II> e: - .... ... :1 an e: o u u..I: C UJ > 1-:> ... Ua ex: ,~ E: -I c:r I- U e: ... ~ 'c:r U an I.. III ~ o ... u.. I .c In .... ... II> e: w I e: o .... ... 3: o e: "" ) ) .) o CD ... v ... ... CD ~ o In III N o:t N ... ... o o o o I.. ... 0 ... '+- "'111 >' eno ... . III 0 e: o e: 0 C, 0_.. 0""0_ ~it1_ NO... 0 0- 0:: >. M"C"Q .... ... III e: e: ""111 ana III an O-OQle: Ouoano OOoan_ .. IJt .. <I ....,. c:r-lnO .... iIIf"<t-s..1.ft ,..... NO_ ..,. . tA- ..... :J U c- an enu ......-oIJCq III E: QI '.. QI IIII.'C s.. _ !. QJ C .... 0.... III III U)'+-Ule: -II> 1..01.1I>c: 000 e:- -"O"'UJL QI OInCD'QI NNvle: NtFt_ ..... III In "'"'Co-ene: CDe:o-IIIUJ o III 0- e: .. .. .... ~ M .... III III ... C'... I. ~ 0- CI In CD In '+- OJ III. e 'CN'CUI :1 ~, :J. an .... - - -.... ~ u... UI: en e: e: .... ... ... ex: In - > III e o .... ~ o e: UJ QI '+- :1 ex: e o I- u.. an .... > e In III ........e - >. e 0 111-.... 3...1 an>.>, .......3: ......... :t: ... U I OJ III e: 'C....... -...> rø·... III - > e... III >. III e III I.. w...[!I e Õ e pup ¡¡: ¡¡: 'C III o 'C 0:: ~ III CD en :1 In III ... .... > III III 3 e ) ) 'C III o 0:: QI e: - ...J .... U e: ... u ~ It o o o o o In ... o N CD X ..: o .... >. ~ I QI e: ... > QI Il. III r1i e o I- u.. QI > ... .5 ~ o e: UJ QI '+- :1 0:: ) o:t o:t .{1 m 0- o:t ... ... l- ll. - c:r o .... ~ I III c: - > QI Il. III r1i e o I.. u.. 'C III o 0:: In In III ... :1 W I 'C I.. o '+- 'C III CD ) >. ~ u.. o o ..0 o:t N In ... M "'" "'" 0- M ... ... ... I.. o '+- c o o o In ... 'C e: III o ... o:t o:t CD N * .... III QI I.. QI ....en UJ ra e: ð-;;¡ '+- I.. e o o o U an o ... OE: m * .c .... - e UJ I L. QI - - Q/ "" o .... I.. III 3: o .... .c en X o .... .... an - III x e: w ra ...J'CO ... .... ~~'C "''+-ra ....co 0....0:: I ... e ~ >'UJ 0 'CI'C ra I.. ra .c III III UJ"'E: ... e III e 0"" 0 I.. I.. u.. u.. 3: o e: UJ QI '+- :1 0:: e o I.. u.. 'tI '" o ex: >. QI an L. :1 CD 'C III o 0:: I.. III an ~ III 0 e: .... I.. .c III II> û) X ) ) o 0 o v 0 o:t 0 M 0 - N ... N N ..0 D- O D- ... o 0 ,... 0 ~, ,... o:t In 0- 0 ,... ~. ... ... e: ... III I.. e I.. o e: '+- '.. III o I.. ..0 e r. In U ..0 In ... I: 'tI I.. e: 0 III '+- o 0 ... 0 M ,... o:t CD M N ... ... U In - E: I- o '+- o o ;0 o In ... 'tI e: r¡¡ ..... III III I- .... UJ I.. o '+- .... .... III III QI III .. ¡ .. .... 0'>.... Ulr¡¡UI e: ð -;;¡ ð '+-..... o o 0 o .0 o U 0 In 1f) .~ " o-I:,... In _ ... ... N N ..0 0- ~, CD ... >. III I.. .... :1 c:r e: .c o ... o .... III >. III u.. III - ... ... .... CD o .... .. III e: .. :J l- e o I.. u.. .... an - .. :1 o I- a .. u.. 'tI r¡¡ o rr: 'C ... III ... '+- .c .... Q/ > ... I.. e e UI x >. III e: > C - .... .. >. 0 III ... III ~ ... III 0 CD ..J ) ) .... .... o U UJ o .... ~ o 'C r¡¡ III I: e: III III .. [!I e o .. u.. o o ..0 ,... ,... M ... '111 ...J .x .. o U o :.... -ë > - CD an - > III e e o .. u.. >. III 3 an - - J: 'C - III I. QI e w ) III e: - ...J ¡ U e: - U III .t o .... ... III e: ... 'C ~ U e o .. u.. III > .. e e: - .... ;¡¡ I: ., .. o '+- o o o N CD ... 'C e: III o o o m "'" ... .... III ~ III ....en UI ra e: á .; '+- I. e o o . o U In 0_ OI: v ... o o o o M In ... M In ... M N ... >. III ... I.. - .c UI o .... 1/1 ... > III e e o I.. u.. III > 'tI III I- o '+- - U III Il. 1/1 :5 1.0. ~ .. ) e: III e ~ III Z \' o o o o o o N ... ~ > o 'C III III l- e... In 'e: .0 - .... U :1 l- i..... 1/1 e: e ,U 'tI e: ·ra ·0 311-1n .11-:1 a__ . e... ex: 0 ....0 o ...0 0 e:m -11-,... 0'> - CD e: CD w ... an .... III Q/ I- .... UJ -ë ... an III ex: !ü III - I: ) ... I: 1; .... o o o In N .... .... e % o >. III ....111- 3: 0 :r 0 ..J 111_ .... - 0 >111.... e:u ¡ 0 -.eN [!I....m o eo. OCDI J: ...: ! Î, ¡;; U e: III I.. CD >. III ~ o - ... III U. o o o N - 11- ... U an " ... ... ¡;; U e: III I- CD >. III ~ o ... ... III U ) o o o ,... M III - ... + o o o ,... ... v - ... + o o o In M ..0 - ... o o o 11- !D !D o o o o M v M ... v ... rr: ri e .... III ..J >. III 'C ... ... o I e o .t ... ... ... .c u e: III I- CD >. III ~ e ... ... III .u ) ) . U an - I: o o o o III * 'tI e: ra o o o - !D v '" UJ x >. e: o o .... >. ~ I III e: '.. > III e... r¡¡ l- t.!) e o I- u.. .x "" III III QI III I- I- U U >. >. III III .x "" U U III III E: I: o 0 .:;. 0 c 0 - - M M L" !D ... '" - U In ... I: I- o '+- o o o o o - ... 'C e: III o o o M ,... '" ~ o e: UI III '+- :1 0:: o .... "" o o I.. '.0 >. III e: e .... UI e .... e: o an c: e e I.. III I e o I- u.. ... III e: :; l- ra ·u I i I , .... ... .c u e: III I.. CD an L. :111 '.x ... ra 3 'tI e: III o o o In - ..0 ,+ o Ù o In 0_ 'I: ..0 ,... I.. 11- 0 '+- + o 00 00 o ·0 ,... ~, 11-... 11- ... 1 , . o o o CD M ..0 N ... c c c . o 0- C) ... o 0 o 0 o 0, - In - o:t v M ... . ... ,., ... . u an ï: I.. e - o o o Õ In ... 'tI e: ra o o o o In '" In :J ... e... o o o In N N * e: e ... .... U III .... o L. ~ e: o '.. an o I.. W .x c: ra CD ¡;; .... L. o Z e: III e: - ra I.. o ra e QI L I- oe¡: .... tp~ . ... U- IIIJ: ... E: "" III QI I- U U In I: III ... - I .c .... I.. e Z ... an III e u.. II> CD ) ) . . ". -'-~-----"'-",-----,-_.,-- -~---~------_. -.-----.-..-.-'.---....--- TO SEE MAP FOR AGENDA PLEASE CONTACT CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE/MUNICIPAL RECORDS ¡ i L- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ;, Department: Utility Council Meeting Date: i .i- i r Subject: w I Watuaga Trunk Sewer - Phase II, Change Order #1 Agenda Number: 10-14-85 PW 85-24 'I l The purpose of this change order is to put in some water service along Wa~auga Road where Watauga is rebuilding the street. The City of Watauga had requested that we accept this change order and they would pay the amount of the change order. .".. l Recommendation: The staff recommends to approve change order #l for P&R Construction Company in the amount of $11,550. 1 1 i r 1 i L-- 1 1 i 1 T T I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) :.L.- Operating Budget r'-...- Other ~fL- ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Rev 6700 1 - . Finance Director 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 'Department: Utility bI ,SubJect: Chapman Drive, P".ittg ,...., Change Order (Jl ~ 1 1 , , , 1 1~ ~ ~ ~ I f f r fz.. ï l Council Meeting Date: &Drainas~'Improve.ments Agenda Number: 10-14-R'J 'PW 85-26 This change order is to extend a sewer lin~ to the east along Chapman Drive near Hewitt Street. This sewer line will serve several vacant tracts of land in the future and will also serve the new.chu~ch building that the Methodist Church is building on the corner of Cbapman and Smithfield Road. Recommendation: The staff recommends the approval of change order #l to APAC-Texas, Inc., in the amount of $13,813.75. Funding source: It is the recommendation that funds be tran~ferred as follows: From.: 09-01-99-6700 $l3,813. 7S To: 09-00-76-6700 $13~813.75 Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number ~:;itl~?~ ~~ su~'c;e~Mifl1 ~ Department Head Signa ure 'City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM See above . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 KOMATSU ALBERT S. KOMATSU & ASSOCIATES. INC. ,--. October 3, 1985 Mr. Roger Line City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 13305 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Dear Roger: We propose to provide architectural and engineering services including construction observation and administation for the Police Administration and Jail Facility Remodel and Addition (Budget $1,850,800) for a fee of 7.162% of the construction cost and for the Library/Recreation facility remodel (Budget $500,000) for 8.25%. We have reviewed the proposal of beginning construction on the addition to the Municipal Complex before the library is vacated and find that the construction could start as much as nine months prior to vacating the building. The cost impact would be approximately an additional $4,000.00 if the existing wall can be left basically intact. The impact on the library during construction would be minimal. There would be an increase in traffic and noise which we believe can be tol erated . It was a pleasure meeting with you and we look forward to working on these projects. We're most grateful for this opportunity to serve the City of North Richland Hills. Sincere 1 y, G~ ,;J. -f~ Albert S. Komatsu /\' Chairman of the Board AS K: vd ARCHITECTS' ENGINEERS' INTERIOR DESIGNERS P.O, BOX 2079 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76113 . 817/332-1914 . METRO 429-7463 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 10/14/85 --, Subject: l I l Proposed Contract for Library Consultant Services Agenda Number: PW 85-28 The Library Director has made an exhaustive study to select for the City Council consideraton a library consultant which is needed to assist in detailed space needs planning in connection with remodeling the Richland Hills Church of Christ building for library purposes. The attached proposal has been received from Mr. David M. Henington to provide such services at a fee of $3,000. This proposal has been coordinated with Mr. Komatsu, the recommended architect for the project. 'l Mr. Henington is believed to be one of the outstanding experts in library design and the proposed fee is believed to be reasonable. l Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Månager be authorized to enter into an agreement with Mr. David M. Henington for the services described above. -l l 1 ! 1 1 1 1 'T 1 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1 l,- 'T I ! ,e~~ . Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager L Page 1 of 1 '---- §) -ð ¿S '-- October 4, 1985 Ms. Arlita Hallam North Richland Hills Public Library 7301 NE Loop 820 P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Ms. Hallam: Thank you for calling me regarding the possibility of HBW Associates, Inc. providing building consulting services for the North Richland Hills Public Library. We appreciate being asked to respond to your request. From our conversation, I understand that you wish to renovate a building of approximately 50,000 square feet into a functional public library. For this task you have asked HBW to respond on specific duties to be performed with the accompanying costs for the service. HBW will provide the following consultant services: 1. Space needs study/analysis. 2. Preparation of basic building program (not including many of the detailed points generally shown). 3. Work with architect on initial planning stage of the project. I will be prepared to begin this project soon after acceptance for the assignment with the understanding that I must accommodate schedule here in Houston. For the task I will make two site visits, the first to review the needs of the library, visit the current and visit the new building site. The second site visit would principally include discussions with the design team on the plan development. For this project our fee will be $3,000. This fee will include all reasonable expenses. I assumed in this figure the library staff could provide trans- portation from the airport and back. I will look forward to hearing from you after the proposal has been considered by city officials and you. Thank you. Sincerely, ~w, David M. Henington President DMH:nab cc: Mr. Waters Mr. Brawner Please reply to: 6225 Son Felipe Rood Houston. Texas 77057 713/780-3798 HOW Associates. Inc. Library Planners and Consultants 2510 Telegraph Dallas. Texas 75228 214/321-5973 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS \l Department: Utility 10-14-85 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PW 85-29 -1- Subject: Cardinal Lane Water Extension Bid Tabulation l This not only includes the Cardinal Lane water main but also the replacement of the water lines in Glenann Addition that the Council authorized several months ago. '-1 As you can see the low bidder did not include the calendar days in his bid for this job but he had agreed with the city engineer to do the job in 200 calendar days. In talking with the city attorney about the legality of leaving out the calendar day bid in the bids, we should negotiate with the low bidder to reduce the calendar days below 200 calendar days. l l The staff has made telephone contact with the owner of Mid State Utilities and presented this information. He has stated that he will talk to his superintendent and get back with the city before the Council meeting. 1 The next low bidder on the job was approximately $37,000 higher but his bid time was 120 calendar days. 1 If we can negotiate the calendar days to something lower than 200 calendar days then I think the city attorney would be in a more comfortable position to defend awarding the bid to Mid State Utilities. 1 Recommendation: The staff recommends to award the bid to Mid State Utilities in the amount of $435,410.04. , - 1 Funding source: The amounts associated with this proposed contract is $336,224.00 for Cardinal Lane and $99,186.04 for Glenann extensions and other miscellaneous water line extensions. The budgeted amount for Cardinal Lane is $328,535.98. A proposed budget has not been established for the Glenann project. The recommended funding source is listed as follows: 1 To: 09-00-16-6700 $106,874.06 $106,874.06 1 From: 09-00-99-6700 'T T Finance Review T Acct. Number ~fficie unds Available ~H - 1Jl/;:¡; City Manager See above Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ _ t L~~ Department Head Sign e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Rev T~- . Finance Director l Page 1 of 1 · ~ ~." ~ KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. '~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas October 9, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-548, (!.TV OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CARDINAL LANE WATER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS BI D TABULATION In accordance with your instructions, bids were received on October 3, 1985, for the referenced project. This project includes water system extensions on Davis Blvd., Cardinal Lane, Amundson Drive, and miscellaneous water line replacements in the Glenann Addition near Main Street. The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the tabulation indicates, bids were received from sixteen (16) contractors. 'the low bid was received from MID-STATE UTILITIES, P.O. Box 1160 Waco, Texas, ï6ì03, (no phone number given), in the amount of $435,410.04. This contractor neglected to bid a contract completion time, therefore, if you choose to award the contract to MID-STATE then a contract completion time will have to be negotiated. The contractor has verbally agreed to 200 calendar days. The sp.cond low bid submitted was from CIRCLE IC' CONSTRUCTION CO., P.O. Box 40328, Ft. Worth, Texas 76140, (817/293-1863) in the amount of $472,742.00 for a period of 120 calendar days. The MID-STATE amount associated with the Cardinal Lane line is approximately $336,224 and the protion associated with the Glenann water line replacements is about $99,186.04. The amount budgeted for the Cardinal Lane portion is $328,535.98. We do not have the budget figures for the Glenann portion. Attached are reference letters and lists of recently completed projects furnished by MID-STATE for your information. We have not yet had an opportunity to check all the references but will report to you on our findings at the Council Meeting. We do not know of any engineering reasons ',.¡hich would preclude award to either of the two low bid contractors. We w'ill be available at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you mav have concerning this project. Meanwhile, please do not hesitate to call. SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 Cardinal Lane Water System Extensions, continued '- ~.~ RICf1ARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance - October 9, 1985 I L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS i I I L Department: Utility Council Meeting Date: 10-14-85 Agenda Number: PAY 85-50 SUbject: Watauga Trunk LinePhasø 2....Pårtial Pay Est;1.mate#4 Our part of th;1.sjob;1.~complete at this timenOWé\1er, we are still holding the retainage for the Job and also themoñet tnatWatauga owes for change order #l. Reconunendation: The staff recommènds to pay $43,994.69 to P&R Construction Company. I I I . ~ I l ¡ l i , l~ i \ ~ 1 I , , i 1 I 1 I 1 ( I 1 ~\~ ~ Finance Rev.lew Source of Funds: Acct. Number 09-00-69-6750 ~~!iti~ _Â SUf1¡Cf~1i-:~ ~ '~~".'K'K Department~nai11&e . ........ ... ··City.Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I L Page l' of I · KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. ~- CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas October 4, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-421, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BIG FOSSIL CREEK SANITARY SEWER WATAUGA TRUNK LINE - PHASE 2 CONTRACTOR IS PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.4 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.4, dated October 8, 1985, made payable to P & R Construction Co. Inc., in the amount of $43,994.69, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of September 30, 1985. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the original submittal, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. The indicated quantities reflect revisions of Change Orders No. 1 and 2, subject to Council consideration and approval. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $43,994.69, be made to P & R Construction Co. Inc., 2040 Loop 336, Suite 125, Conroe, Texas 77304. Along with a copy of this letter, -the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ,c2-: P .E. RWA!11 d Enclosures cc: Mr. ROdger N. Line, City Manager _ , Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works ~~ Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Scott Jenogan, Utilities Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance P & R Construction Inc. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283·6211 . METRO/267·3367 ¡ '- .,.' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS i L Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 10-14-85 Agenda Number: PAY 85-51 Subject: Hewitt Street Pavin2 & Dr a iìÜttte Itnprovements Partial Pay EStitnate 13 ~ I ' ! ~ l Most of the drainagew()rk.h~$been accomp1ishedfor/~h±sjob and the contractor is(nowW'()rk.ingon the reconstruction ()f.the street. This contractorhas.dQtletanoutstanding job in keepingithe.neighborhood satisfied as farasg~ttingin and out on this job. I hope that this continues. I i Ll l l i \ 1 I __ Î It appears at this time tbat if the weatbernöldsthat this contractor will complete thisjob>way ahead of schedule. Recommendation: 'The s.táff recommends to approve,aY_ntto P&R Paving, Inc. in the amount of $95,448.40. 1 ì I I 1 ! 1 ~/ I ì 1 I i 1 ! T ~~- ~ L Source of Funds: ACct.Number 13-00-50-6150 ~:;itl(~gO~~~_ ~ SUlfš~!I;ri7;:- Department Headßlg"ature.i ... ' '. .. .. >//,' . City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION/rEM - / Fln~nce RevieW . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 / . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas October 8, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-210, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HEWITT STREET PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR IS PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.3 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's partial Pay Estimate No.3, dated October 8, 1985, made payable to P & R Paving Inc., in the amount of $95,448.40, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of September 30, 1985. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: Please use this form for submitting next month's estimate for processing. We will be present at the next Council Metting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. .~ RWA/lI d Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works ~s [tUSCOf...tEO.R Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr~ Scott Jenogan. Utility Inspector Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance P & R Paving Inc. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I ~ S!.Ibject: Harwood Road Street & Dtaina.ge Improvements Partial Pay Estimate #6 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PAY 85-52 10-14-85 Department: Public Works \ t-' I l I ~ i ; l j I l ¡ ~ ~ ~.~ I 1 ~ I 1 ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ L This job is IOO% complete at this time however,thi$ is not the final payment for this job. The city is still holdin~ the retainage on this job. Recommendation: The staff recommends, to approve the payment of $10,671. 27 to Austin Road Company. ,.J Finance Review . Finance Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ -:-~ Department HeadSlgnatÚrê·· . CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM GO - - Page 1 of 1 / . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas '~ '-,- October 8. 1985 ~.. Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 .....,- -.' Re: 3-229, CITY OF'NORTH RICHLAND HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON HARWOOD ROAD FROM BOB DR. TO HIGHWAY 26 CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.6 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.6, dated October 8, 1985, made payable to Austin Road Co., in the amount of $10,671.27, for materials furnished and work performed in the referenced project as of September 30, 1985. The Quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Larry Jones, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $10,671.27, be made to Austin Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Ft. Worth, Tx, 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing neyt month1s estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any Questions you may have concerning this project. RI~<1 r2lA:- RWA/lI d Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works + iJ:HISCOP.:.'tFOF? Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Austin Road Co. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283·6211 . METRO/267-3367