The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1985-10-28 Agendas L L... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 28, 1985 - 6:00 P.M. '"'- For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Councilman Jim Ramsey a. Consent Items -Rules/Regulations b. Council Meeting Decoruœ c. Televising.CoUt1cil Meetings Review d. Cable Buy Status '-- L -- 2. Other Items L 3. *Executive Session to Discuss Land, ,Personnel, and/or Litigation '- *Closed due to subject matter as provided by '"'- the Open Meetings Law I i L L... L Î i L '- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 28, 1985 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER 1. ITEM Call to Order ACTION TAKEN 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting October 14, 1985 5. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by Asterisk (7, 8, 9, 10, 13, & 14) *7. PS 85-18 Consideration of the Request for Authorization of Contract Agreement with State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for Bridge Construction on State Highway 26 *8. PS 85-69 Request by David Barfield and Roger and Joan Hanson to Replat Lot 3R-1, Block 1, Martin Addition (Located on the west side of Precinct Line Road immediately north of the existing and proposed Nob Hill Subdivision) Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *9. PS 85-70 Request by Charles D. and Patricia Bathman for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Bathman Addition (Located on the west side of Smithfield Road south of the extension of Bursey Road) *10. PS 85-73 Request by Burk Collins Investments for Replat of 1R and 2R, Richland Oaks Addition (Located on the northeast corner of Bedford Euless Road and Strummer Drive) 11. SO 85-13 Request of William R. Waugh Company for Variance to Sign Ordinance for Burger Street Drive-Thru Restaurant in North Park Shopping Center, 6440 Rufe Snow Drive 12. SO 85-14 Request of Dr. Alexander Graham for Variance to Sign Ordinance for 5409 Davis Boulevard *13. GN 85-105 Lone Star Rate Increase, Ordinance No. 1302 *14. PW 85-30 Award of Bid on Flory Street Improvements to Walker Construction 15. Citizen Presentation 16. Adjournment City of J(órth Richland Hills, Texas ~ ~. 11z1_ -f- October 28, 1985 TO: City Council FROM: Richard Royston //J/ Director of planning and Development ~ SUBJECT: Proposed Planning and Zoning Commission Rules and procedures ~"'-- In an effort to provide a more formal basis on which the operation of the Planning and Zoning Commission could be conducted the Commission directed the Staff to propare a set of rules and procedures for the Commission. These rules and procedures were distilled from the text of the Charter of the City and from the general practices of the meeting schedule and conduct. In addition the requirements of the State Laws governing the open meetings process have been addressed. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the attached Rules and Procedures for the operation of the Commission and requests that the City Council concur in the adoption of these Rules and Procedures. '"- '"- (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 z Cf. 0 ...:I H ...:I Cf. H Cf. ::c H Cf. ~ ¡,;:: ~ p:: ~ þ u ß s3 0 u u Z 0 H H p:: ~ p:: ~ p.¡ - ::c N ~ ~ '" ~ ~ 0 ~ Z Cf. t4 ¡,;:: ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 Z H ~ Z H ~ U ...:I p.¡ r r- r- r- ¡- c. r-- ~ ~ r-r- r-- r-- r-- r--. _ ~J ~ (~ ¡ ~ ---, ---, --, --, -:--.-. ~....., ....., ....., ....., -., Vice-Chairman, shall preside at all meetings, shall decide all points of order or procedure. All letters of trnansmittal from the Commission to the City Council shall be over the signature of the Chairman. , '" ( :1 'f I II . I- .. The Chairman shall call the Commission to order, and the members present and absent shall be recorded by the Planning and Zoning Coordinator calling the roll. The minutes of any preceding meeting shall be submitted for approval. The public shall be advised of the procedures to be followed in the meeting. The Director of Planning and Development shall publicly advise the Commission of any communication received pertaining to any matter before the Commission. I I ~ritten Request Required Every proposal submitted for Commission ilon shall be made in writing. Where ~___-____~opr1ate application forms are provided by the ~said proposal shall be filed on said forms, fll be accompanied by all prescribed fees, and ill be complete in all respects before being capted for filing. APPLICATION PROCEDURES I I Schedules and Instructions Every proposal or request for Commission ion or recommendation shall be filed, cessed, and considered in accordance with cific schedules and instructions adopted as êndices to these Rules and Procedures. The Commission shall then hear and act upon those proposals scheduled for consideration or public hearing together with such other matters of business and report as the Commission or Planning and Development Director finds to require Commission consideration. I I I I Submission of Supporting Information Information supporting a request or to approve or disapprove any the Commission shall be submitted Planning and Zoning Coordinator the Commission in public 'meeting. commendation oposal before ly through the !ìfwriting or to ,ji" B Presentation or Hearing of Proposals 't. The Commission shall call each proposal in such order as to be in accord with the hearing time specified in the notice of Public Hearing. 2~ The Chairman shall then call on persons present who wish to speak to the proposal and shall direct that they speak in the following order a The applicant or his representative b Those persons in support c. Those persons in opposition Whenever necessary the Chairman shall direct that all remarks shall be germane to the proposal. At the Chairman's descretion he may also impose a specified time limit for each speaker wishing to address a particular proposal. No rebuttal shall be allowed from either side, unless granted by a majority vote of the Commission. The Commission 5 ) ) . II 'J ;~J i~;,: ~: "HS- ,;{t' \'1;', ~~: I ~ I ell' J œ I œ ~ .. J Withdrawal of Proposal When any applicant desires to withdraw any proposal he may do so by filing a written request to ~hat effect with the Planning and Zoning COordinator. Such request shall be effective upon ~be date of its official receipt, provided, ~ever, that no such request shall be valid after .ö~~ces have been mailed, except on action of the ~"$mission. Withdrawal of a proposal at any stage ~ts processing shall terminate all stderation of it by the City, and the case shall be closed. file or in his absence the 4 DECISIONS if Order of Business '{; The Chairman, AND -' Page 12 P & Z Minutes October 10, 1985 ( PZ 85-118 APPROVED 14. PZ 85-119 ~'--- 15. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RULES & PROCEDURES ( Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to request to please come forward. There being no one wish in 0 speak, the Chairman ublic Hearing. Mr. Schwinger ade the motion to -118. This motion was second y Ms. Flippo and the motion car . d 5-0. Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding bowling alleys. Chairman Bowen stated that bowling alleys were left out of the present zoning ordinance and the Commission feels C-1 Commercial is the proper zoning classification. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-119. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Consideration of adopting Planning & Zoning Rules and Procedures. , Mr. Wood asked if they could put a time limit on the speaking. Mr. Royston said this states it would be at the discretion of the Chairman, he could limit to some time frame. Chairman Bowen said there was a blank in Section 1B regarding the election of officers. He said they need to list some month. Chairman Bowen said the Commission is appointed in May, but suggests they put September~ October, or November in the space to appoint the officers. Mr. Wood said he thought September would be good. ""-- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - OCTOBER 14, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order October 14, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dan Echols Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Jim Kenna Virginia Moody Harold Newman Jim Ramsey '-- Staff : Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Lee Maness Gene Riddle Richard Royston Richard Albin Stan Gertz Marjorie Nash Don Bowen Press: David Ray Mark England Chris Williams Absent: Richard Davis Rodger N. Line Mayor Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Finance Director Public Works Director Director of Planning City Engineer Fire Chief Planning & Zoning Member Planning & Zoning Member Northeast Chronicle Mid Cities Fort Worth Star Telegram - Mayor Pro Tem City Manager 3. Councilman Fisher gave the invocation. 4. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of September 23, 1985. Motion carried 6-0. 5. Councilwoman Moody removed Item No. 10 and Archie Smith, Frontier GMC Inc., removed Items No. 38 & 44 from the Consent Agenda. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 APPROVED REMOVAL OF ITEMS(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA --- 7. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. 8. Delayed because Mr. Rodriguez was not present at this time. 9. Mr. Clyde Womack presented the City with a Certificate of Conformance in financial reporting. 8. Mayor Echols presented Resolution No. 85-27 to Mr. Charles Rodriguez for rescuing a citizen from a burning structure. -----.. Fire Chief Stan Gertz presented Mr. Rodriguez with a plaque on behalf of the Fire Department. 10. Councilwoman Moody stated her concern was that the ordinance was not clearly defined. Councilwoman Moody stated she felt the City's future was in strip center type developments rather than large shopping centers. Councilwoman Moody stated that the strip centerš would be classified as mini- warehouse, office/showroom type warehoused and the way she read the ordinance they would fall into this category and have to be in industrial zoning. Councilwoman Moody stated she felt the intent was to try and get the storage warehouses in industrial zoning and not office/showroom type warehouses. Mr. Royston stated that in the proposed ordinance there were definitions in Section B which specifically addressed the type of uses defined as warehouse. Mr. Royston stated these were strictly storage and mini-warehouse self-storage. Burk Collins, 5228 Rufe Snow Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Collins stated he spoke in opposition to this ordinance at the Planning & Zoning Commission, but Mr. Royston had clarified his questions since that time. October 14, 1985 Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (15, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, & 57) APPROVED GN 85-98 RESOLUTION NO. 85-27, SPECIAL PRESENTATION BY FIRE DEPARTMENT TO MR. RODRIGUEZ GN 85-102 PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE - CLYDE WOMACK OF PEAT, MARWICK & MITCHELL CO PZ 85-102 ORDINANCE NO. 1284, CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING WAREHOUSING APPROVED '- Mayor Echols advised the Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval of the Ordinance with a grace period of 6 months for proposed projects being proposed. Mr. Royston stated that at this time there was no requests for mini-warehouses. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 1284 with the exception that the grace period of 6 months not be allowed. Motion carried 4-2; Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody and Councilmen Kenna and Fisher voting for and Councilmen Newman and Ramsey voting against. 11. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. -"- 12. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Ordinance No. 1285, permit to be issued in the name of Kenneth Adcock and non-transferable. Motion carried 6-0. - 13. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 14. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1286, permit to be issued in the name of Otis Campsey and non-transferable. Motion carried 6-0. October 14, 1985 Page 3 PZ 85-103 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF ERIN'S FOODS TO REZONE LOT 6, BLOCK 1, JACK M. ESTES SUBDIVISION FROM C-1 (COMMERCIAL) TO C-1-SPECIFIC USE SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION (LOCATED AT 3900 RUFE SNOW DRIVE) ORDINANCE NO. 1285 APPROVED PZ 85-104 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF B & C OIL COMPANY TO REZONE LOT A2, PARCHMAN ADDITION, FROM C-1 (COMMERCIAL) TO C-1 SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION (LOCATED AT 6955 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY) ORDINANCE NO. 1286 APPROVED *15. '-- 16. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. John Mattox, General Manager of World Class Motors, appeared before the Council. Mr. Mattox stated they presently had a business located in Grand Prairie and would like to move phase two of the business to North Richland Hills. Mr. Mattox stated they dealt exclusively in luxury European automobiles. Mr. Mattox stated they would not do any type of repair work at this location; they would operate a retail outlet/showroom. Councilwoman Moody asked Mr. Mattox if he was aware of the restrictions that the City generally placed on used car lots. ------- Mr. McEntire stated the Planning & Zoning Commission did not put any restrictions on the request. Mr. Mattox stated that it was brought to his attention at the Planning & Zoning meeting that a new interchange was planned near this location. Mr. Mattox stated they only signed a three year lease and would have no problem with the interchange being built. - Councilman Fisher asked appróximately how many cars would be stored at the location. Mr. Mattox stated there would be very few cars stored. Councilwoman Moody asked what the hours of operation would be. Mr. Mattox stated from 9:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Councilman Ramsey stated that he had difficulty in zoning the entire property for used autos. Mr. McEntire stated a contract could be worked out with the applicants or he could revise the ordinance so that it would pertain only to the property that World Classic would be leasing. October 14, 1985 Page 4 PZ 85-105 ORDINANCE NO. 1287, CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1080 REGARDING THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK APPROVED PZ 85-106 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF WORLD CLASS MOTORS, LTD. TO REZONE LOT 5, KIPS BIG BOY ADDITION, FROM C-1 (COMMERCIAL) TO C-1 SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF USED AUTOS (LOCATED AT 7755 NORTHEAST LOOP 820) Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 17. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve Ordinance No. 1288. Councilman Kenna requested that the motion be amended to guarantee that no other car lot would be placed on the property. After further discussion, Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to amend the motion to state that a contract between World Classic Motors, Ltd. and the property owner be drawn up so that only the portion being leased by World Classic would be used for a used car lot. Motion carried 5-1; Councilmen Kenna, Fisher, Newman, Ramsey, and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for and Councilwoman Moody voting against. 18. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. J.B. Oujesky, Real Estate Representative for Winn Dixie, appeared before the Council. Mr. Oujeksy stated they would like to sell beer for off premise consumption at this location. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one elsè wish~ng to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 19. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1289 to be in the name of J.B. Oujesky and non-transferable. Motion carried 6-0. 20. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Harris Hughey stated they planned to open a restaurant in the Harwood Plaza and would like to sell alcoholic beverages. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. October 14, 1985 Page 5 ORDINANCE NO. 1288 APPROVED PZ 85-107 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF WINN-DIXIE TEXAS, INC. TO REZONE PART OF LOTS 16A, BLOCK 5, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ADDITION, FROM LR (LOCAL RETAIL) TO LR SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION (LOCATED AT 7201 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY) ORDINANCE NO. 1289 APPROVED PZ 85-109 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF BOGIES RESTAURANT TO REZONE PART OF LOT 1R, BLOCK 1, WALKERS BRANCH ADDITION, FROM C-1 (COMMERCIAL) TO C-1 SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (LOCATED AT 8407 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY) 21. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve Ordinance No. 1290, permit to be issued in the name of Harris Hughe and non-transferable. Motion carried 6-0. 22. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Taylor Gandy, co-owner, appeared before the Council. Mr. Gandy stated that when the property was originally zoned there was a survey error on the east side of Rufe Snow where additional right-of-way was needed. Mr. Gandy stated the reason for this request was to correct a mistake that was made on the survey. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 23. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 1291. ~ Motion carried 6-0. 24. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Taylor Gandy, co-owner, appeared before the Council. - Mr. Gandy stated a Mobil Station was going in at the corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman and more property was needed for better access to the property and to meet parking requirements. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 25. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Ordinance No. 1292. Motion carried 6-0. October 14, 1985 Page 6 ORDINANCE NO. 1290 APPROVED PZ 85-112 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF CAMPUS HILLS JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 3A2, WILLIAM MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1010, FROM R-6-T (TOWNHOUSES AND GARDEN HOMES) TO C-1 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHAPMAN DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 415 FEET EAST OF RUFE SNOW) ORDINANCE NO. 1291 APPROVED PZ 85-113 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF CAMPUS HILLS JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 3A2, WILLIAM MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1010, FROM R-6-T (TOWNHOUSES AND GARDEN HOMES) TO C-1 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHAPMAN DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 385 FEET EAST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) ORDINANCE NO. 1292 APPROVED October 14, 1985 Page 7 *26. PS 85-58 REQUEST OF JOHNSTON & SON ----- CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR REPLAT OF BLOCK 6, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION (LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF MEADOW LAKES DRIVE AT THE INTERSECTION OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) APPROVED *27. PS 85-61 REQUEST OF J-MC OIL COMPANY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 6, BLOCK 9, RICHLAND HEIGHTS ADDITION (COMMERCIAL TRACT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GLENVIEW DRIVE AND BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD) APPROVED *28. PS 85-63 REQUEST OF HANSON PROPERTIES FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 12-21, BLOCK 1, NOB HILL ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD NORTH OF THE EXISTING NOB HILL SUBDIVISION) APPROVED - *29. - PS 85-65 REQUEST OF HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR FINAL PLAT OF SPRING MEADOWS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SMITHFIELD ROAD NORTH OF CHAPMAN ROAD INTO HEWITT STREET) APPROVED *30. GN 85-97 TEXAS WATER PLAN, RESOLUTION NO. 85-26 APPROVED *31. GN 85-99 NOMINATION FOR MEMBERSHIP ON TAX APPRAISAL DISTRICT - RESOLUTION NO. 8?-27 APPROVED *32. "-- *33. 34. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, that the following appointments be made: Civil Service Commission - Jeff Newsom, two year term; George Pederson, two year term; Bob Roark, one year term; Lyle Welch, one year term; Jack Frisque (Alternate), one year term; Cable T.V. Board - Ray Fulenwider, two year term; Nancy Gum, two year term; Parks Board - RonJ. Parks, two year term. Motion carried 6-0. 35. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Ramsey, to approve Resolution No. 85-28. Motion carried 6-0. ------- *36 - *37. 38. Mr. Archie Smith, representative of Frontier GMC, Inc. appeared before the Council. Mr. Smith stated they had made an error in their bid and stood to lose $4,000. Mr. Smith asked that Frontier GMC, Inc. be released from their bid on the tandum dump truck. Mr. Smith stated that Frontier GMC, Inc. was also low bidder on Item No. 44, (6) S-10 type pickups and if the Council would release Frontier GMC, Inc. from the bid on the dump truck they would forego the bid on the pick- ups. October 14, 1985 Page 8 GN 85-100 REGULATION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES, ORD INANCE NO. 1293 APPROVED GN 85-101 PROPOSED BEAUTIFICATION PROJECTS APPROVED GN 85-103 APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS/COMMISSIONS APPROVED GN 85-104 SUPPORTING INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS TO IH 820/AIRPORT FREEWAY INTERCHANGE, RESOLUTION NO. 85-28 APPROVED PU 85-32 HEAVY DUTY TRUCK WITH TOOL BOX BODY (1 EACH) - BID AWARD TO JACK WILLIAMS CHEVROLET APPROVED PU 85-33 JANITORIAL SERVICES - AWARD CONTRACT TO JANI-KING APPROVED PU 85-34 TANDUM DUMP TRUCK (1 EACH) - AWARD BID TO FRONTIER GMC, INC. APPROVED '-- *39. *40. .------ *41. *42. *43. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to re-bid the tandum dump truck. Mr. Horvath stated he would recommend that they not re-bid but go to the second low bidder. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to amend the motion to release Frontier GMC, Inc. from their bid on the tandum dump truck and award the bid to Jack Williams Chevrolet. Councilman Ramsey stated it was unfortunate that a mistake had been made, but a contract had been signed. Motion carried 4-2; Councilmen Kenna and Newman, and Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody voting for and Councilmen Fisher and Ramsey voting against. : 44. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to award the bid to Frontier GMC, Inc. Motion carried 6-0. October 14, 1985 Page 9 PU 85-35 DUMP TRUCKS (3 EACH) - BID AWARD TO JACK WILLIAMS CHEVROLET APPROVED PU 85-36 OFFICE SUPPLIES - AWARD CONTRACT TO E.L. WHITE APPROVED PU 85-37 BLAZER/RAM CHARGER VEHICLE - BID AWARD TO NORTH LOOP DODGE APPROVED PU 85-38 FULL-SIZE MARKED POLICE UNITS (7 EACH) - BID AWARD TO JACK WILLIAMS CHEVROLET APPROVED PU 85-39 ONE FULL- SIZE VEHICLE - BID AWARD TO JACK WILLIAMS CHEVROLET APPROVED PU 85-40 S-10 TYPE PICK UPS (6 EACH) - BID AWARD TO FRONTIER GMC, INC. APPROVED October 14, 1985 Page 10 *45. PU 85-41 FULL-SIZE PICK UP TRUCKS (9 EACH) - BID AWARD TO JACK WILLIAMS CHEVROLET APPROVED *46. PU 85-42 AUTHORIZATION FOR AGREEMENT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING APPROVED *47. PW 85-22 TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF PART OF BIG FOSSIL OUTFALL SEWER LINE AND CONSTRUCTION OF METERING STATION APPROVED *48. PW 85-23 ENGINEERING SERVICES AND SCHEDULE FOR STREET AND DRAINAGE - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPROVED *49. PW 85-24 WATAUGA TRUNK SEWER - PHASE II, CHANGE ORDER #1 APPROVED *50. PW 85-25 WATAUGA - - TRUNK SEWER - PHASE II, CHANGE ORDER #2 APPROVED *51. PW 85-26 CHAPMAN DRIVE PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - CHANGE ORDER #1 APPROVED *52. PW 85-27 ARCHITECT- URAL SERVICES FOR LIBRARY/RECREATION FACILITY REMODELING AND POLICE FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION APPROVED -, . *53. *54. *55. *56. *57. 58. Mr. Keith Dodd, 7201 Hightower, appeared before the Council. Mr. Dodd expressed his dissatisfaction with the Police Department on the procedures used in the arrest of a friend. -: Mayor Echols advised Mr. Dodd of the procedure in filing a formal complaint against the Police Department. Councilman Ramsey stated that he felt the Staff needed to give the Council some feedback concerning Mr. Dodd's complaint. Mr. Gerald Stewart, 8840 Main, appeared before the Council. Mr. Stewart stated that he took exceptions on Mr. Dodd's comments. Mr. Stewart stated he felt a deep appreciation for the North Richland Hills Police Department. Mr. Stewart stated that in his opinion the North Richland Hills Police Department was one of the best in the State. Ms. Gwen Bain, 5636 Newman, appeared before the Council. Ms. Bain expressed her concern on the children that had to cross Grapevine Highway at Harwood. Ms. Bain presented October 14, 1985 Page 11 PW 85-28 PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR LIBRARY CONSULTING SERVICES APPROVED PW 85-29 CARDINAL LANE WATER EXTENSION BID TABULATION APPROVED PAY 85-50 WATAUGA TRUNK LINE PHASE 2 - PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE 114 APPROVED PAY 85-51 HEWITT STREET PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE 113 APPROVED PAY 85-52 HARWOOD ROAD STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE 116 APPROVED CITIZEN PRESENTATION MR. KEITH DODD RE: POLICE DEPARTMENT GWEN BAIN RE: SCHOOL CROSSING AT GRAPEVINE HWY. AND HARWOOD the following petition to the Council: "I the undersigned do hereby petition the City of North Richland Hills and the Birdville Independent School District to come to an agreement on how to fund and with what methods to make the crossing at Grapevine Highway and Harwood safe for the students of Carrie Frances Thomas Elementary and implement their plan immediately before one of the children is seriously injured or killed". Mayor Echols advised Ms. Bain that their had been a lot of correspondence on this matter. Mayor Echols stated that this matter would be pursued. 59. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Newman, to adjourn. Motion carried 6-0. October 14, 1985 Page 12 ADJOURNMENT Mayor ATTEST: -'-.- City Secretary - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 10/28/85 Subject: Request for Authorization of Contract Agreement Agenda Number: PS 85-18 with State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for Bridge Construction on State Highway 26 In April 1985 the City Council approved the Replat Application of Roan/Allen on Tracts 1 through 4 Block lA and 3 Richland Terrace Addition. This replat covered the undeveloped commercial tracts on the south side of Loop 820 west of Grapevine Highway. l One of the major items which the developers proposed to improve in order to develop these tracts is the existing channel of Calloway Branch. The channel is currently earthen construction immediately adjacent to the south service road of Loop 820. The developers have proposed to completely enclose this channel in an underground structure. This proposal had to include enlargement of the existing drainage structure under State Highway 26, Grapevine Highway in order for the drainage system to function properly. Since Grapevine ~ighway is a State-maintained highway it was necessary to gain the approval of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for the proposed project and to allow the State to control the contracting of the enlargement of the bridge structure. The State Department of Highways and Public Transportation cannot, by law, contract with a private developer. Therefore, they have requested that the City of North Richland Hills enter into an agreement to authorize the improvements to the bridge and provide the necessary funds. The Staff has received the enclosed letter signed by Mr. George Allen, partner in the proposed project, agreeing to provide the funds required to satisfy the proposed contract with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. The developers are anxious to proceed with the development and have requested that the City expedite the handling of the proposed contract. l l l l l'- RECOMMENDATION: 1 It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the contract agreement with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for the bridge improvements to State Highway 26 subject to the developers of the Richland Terrace Subdivision providing the necessary escrow funds for completion of the project. 1 :. 1 1 1 ~ Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1 1 , Finance Director _~l"Y\. ~- ~~. \\. \. . ......JJ City Man ger CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 1 Page 1 of 1 ~~D --r NATHAN D. MAIER CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. '~;""" October 22, 1985 Richard Royston City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 Richland Hills, TX 761i8 RictùaDi 'l'errace MU.ti.an Bridge at C'allœøy Branch an state Highway 26 The owner is interested in proceeding with the site development - plans he proposes for Richland Terrace addition. Since the bridge improvements on State Highway 26 are a condition of approval of the site development~ we request that the City of North Richland Hills sign the agreement to the state, agreeing for the reconstruction of the bridge at Calloway Branch on State Highway 26. . , , , - \ The owner agrees to fuÌ1d the said improvements to the _ bridge. The cost of such bridge shall be based on the preliminary, estimate ¡:ut together by the State - Highway Department from plans submitted by us. . Please execute the agreement as soon as possible so that we may begin the ,process of getting state highway approval. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, --:-~......_../ PJB/rp OWner' s Approval --..; -~~, ~~ George'1d:len, Partner 820 Mercantile Association, a Joint Venture NortbPa..k/8800 N. C.ntnl E.pwy./SaU. 300/Da"a.. T.... 75231/(214) 739-.7.1 · COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION P. O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, Texas 76115 July 8, 1985 ENGINEER-DIRECTOR MARK G. GOODE -'- ROBERT C. LANIER, CHAIRMAN ROBERT H, DEDMAN JOHN R, BUTLER, JR. -'- IN REPLY REFER TO FILE NO, .. Control 363-1 Tarrant County SH 26 @ Calloway Branch Mr. Rodger Li ne City Manager, City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Dear Sir: Enclosed are three copies of the agreement for the proposed construction on SH 26 at Calloway Branch. Please execute these three agreements and attach a copy of the City Council Resolution to each agreement. After these agreements have been fully executed, we will return one for your files. - Yours very truly, &r4;;~ Billy A. Hardie District Design Engineer GKT:am - .'t0111 1836 ~!M\ 1986 c¡.~c¡.~Il\t~'" """'''- , ..~ , . ,,, AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE BRIDGE AT CALLOWAY BRANCH ON STATE HIGHWAY 26 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TRAVIS § THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the State of Texas, hereinafter called the -'- IIState, II represented by the Engineer-Director of the State Department of Highways and P4blic Transportation, acting for and in behalf of the State Highway and Public Transportation Commission, and the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, hereinafter called the IICity,1I acting by and through its City Manager, whose authority is evidenced by the City Resolution attached hereto and made a part hereof. !!lI!:!I~~II!:! WHEREAS, the State owns and maintains a system of highways for public use and benefit, including a segment of State Highway 26 which lies within the City of North Richland Hills; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enlarge the bridge over Calloway Branch; and WHEREAS, the State acknowledges the common benefits of the City's proposal. 1 of 3 ----- , .~\ . --------- A G R E E MEN T -'---- NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual con- venants and agreements of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: 1. The City shall prepare or cause to be prepared complete plans and specificiations for the bridge, and work incidental thereto. No construction work shall be performed on the State's right of way until these plans and speci- fications have been approved and accepted by the State. 2. The City shall include in the plans provisions for such detours, barricades, warning signs, flares, flashing light signals and flagmen as are deemed necessary by the State to direct and protect vehicular traffic while the construction work, as hereinabove described to be done on the State's right of way, is in progress. Details of these traffic control measures, conforming to the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, shall be shown in the plans. 3. The City shall be responsible for the actual construction cost to perform all work associated with the reconstruction of the bridge which is authorized herein, with the exception of construction inspection. The City shall be responsible for the cost of any field changes that may occur. 4. The City shall provide any additional right of way or easements required for this project. 5. The State shall grant a permit to the City to construct an 8-10'X 10' MBC, upstream of SH 26, on the State's easement, after the approved plans, with a warrant for the estimated construction cost, are received by the State. 6. The State shall be responsible for the actual cost of contruction inspection for this project. Th~ inspection shall be accomplished by State personnel. 7. The State shall be responsible for advertising, receiving bids and award of the contract. 8. The State will maintain all work within SH 26 right of way. The City will maintain the proposed 8-10'X10' MBC. The State retains right of enter to this easement. In the event, the terms of this agreement are in conflict with the provisions of any other existing agreements and/or cont~acts between the City and the State, this agreement shall take precedence over the other agreements and/or contracts. All other provisions of said existing agreements and/or contracts not in conflict with this agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 2 of 3 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have cause these presents to be executed on the day of , 1985 by the City of North Richland Hills and on the---- day of , 1985 by the State of Texas. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS THE STATE OF TEXAS By: City Manager Certified as being executed for the purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, established policies, or work programs heretofore approved and authorized by the State Highway and Public Trans- portation Commission. ATTEST: City Secretary By: Engineer-Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Executed and approved for State Highway and Public Transportation Commission under authority of Commission Minute Order No. 82907. ------ RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Deputy Director, Design and Construction : District Engineer - District 02 Chief Engineer, Highway Design ""--.~ 3 of 3 ì .' ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 ! Department: ~JUbeCI: PIanuing and Dev,lopment Council Meeting Date: 10/28/85 Plàt Ãppli4ation Lot 3R-1, Block 1, Martin Addition Agenda Number: PS 85-69 1 I ï 1 , 1 i '1 1 T This Replat Applicatiemi is presented for consideration of Lot 3R-1t Block 1, Martin Addition. The property ,isloeated on the west side of Precinct Line Road immediately north of the existing and - proposed Nob Hill Subdivision. The purpose for the proposed replat is to provide the dedication of the street right of way on Nob Hill Drive and Precinct Line Road and to re-or-.ienate the frontage of the lot to Nob Hill Drive rather than to the access strip out to Precinct Line Road currentlyil1 use. The additional. dedication along Nob Bil1;Drive supplies the missing element' ,the Coaission noted in considering a replat of '4 portion of the Nob Bill Subdivi810tî at the Commission's last meeting. All of the Enginèer'scomments are satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Plamdng and Zoning Commission approved the replat of Lot 3R-l, Block 1, Martin Addition as presented in Plat Application PS 85-69. " ì .y- T~ r ~ : T T ¡ ! T ! T Source of Funds: Sands (GO/Rev.) _ 1-.. gferating S~)dget _ _ - _ ~~Zl~um . ~~ ì CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM L .", ' , -"-,' ',-,-'":,, Flnancð Review Ac.ct. Number . Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director /? j' ¡( I ~ J' L-, I I c__J - . PS 95· ,"'1 fo.\ARTIN L..~RI ð, .~ AG ~ :t" PS f~·/" NOt} HIl..I.. 1../1.-2' t3 ,/ R-I . ~.Jl ." I ....t ..:..¡ _¿. ..J Q L -1 I AG R-3 '090 . L Page 2 ~ P & Z Minutes October 10, 1985 PS 85-70 APPROVED 3. PS 85-68 4. PS 85-69 PS 85-69 APPROVED '-- 5. PS 85-72 PS 85-72 APPROVED - 6. PS 85-73 [ Mr. Wood made the motion to ove PS 85-70. This motion seconded by Mr. Hallford and motion carried 5-0. of Jeff Marsh for preliminary plat of Lots 1-16, Block 23, Kingswood Estates. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 85-68. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0 with Mr. Wood abstaining. Request of David Barfield & Roger and Joan Hanson for replat of Lot 3R-1, Block 1, Martin Addition. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 85-69. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Hanson Properties for preliminary plat of Lots 1-7, Bloc Nob Hill North Addition. Mr. Wood made the mo on to approve , PS 85-72. This ion was seconded by Mr. Hallford the motion carried 5-0. st of Burk Collins Investments, for replat of LotslR & 2R, Richland Oaks Addition. Jackie Fluitt with Stembridge and Associates came forward to represent Mr. Collins. He stated he talked to Mr. Royston and found they have a problem with platting a portion of a lot. He said they would just replat Lots 1, 2, and 3. Chairman Bowen said that would take care of it. ( ( . KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-941, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MARTIN ADDITION, LOT 3R1 BLOCK 1, REPLAT, PS 85 - 69. GRID MAP 72 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should be noted on the plat. Iron pins should be set on the most westerly property line segment. Also, the lower southeast corner is not monumented. 2 The right-of-way width of Precint Line Road should be shown. 3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed p]at is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the"Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I . ,( CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Developalertt Council Meeting Date: 10/28/85 , , SUbject: Pla.t App1ie.tion'tot I,·· Blo,ck 1,Bathltan Addition Agenda Number: PS 85-70 l f i I ~ : 1 1 ) 1 i 1 I ~ ! 1 f , ] J 1 ~ f ! r ~ T í i L... This Final Plat" Appll,cat:ton ispres.nted for.. consideration of . Lots 1, Block 1, Bathman Addition. The pròpertyiIJløeat_on the w,at side of, Smithfield Road south of the extension of Bùrs~"~~<"'e,subject tract.is 3~OO acres in size. The purpose for the proposed plati";tòa¡1ot::the applicant to construct à.resid.enctt on the site. The size of theprope-rty, 3.0 8Cr$IÌ, Will allow the development 'of the property for residential use in the AG Agriculture zone. In the Engineer's rertewlétter three items were noted for theC08Iission's consideration. (1) ineeraM. not indiCéte that. . prob1_ exists, he notes that the pbY'. :1nformad,on as required by the ordinance was not provided on ." " . (2) The applicantprÖpoaeatosene th~r.àidenceon the site by the installation of a . septic t.nka e t'be City currently 408S not have .any sewer faèilities within a;,:T" . . . stance.of the proposed lot. . The Ordinance requires that f the applicant's Enlineersubmit·tbe propéT tests for tbeuse of a septic system to Tarrant County forspp.TOVal. The testa were åccolIP'1ished for the lot and the Engineer provided~napproVed copyo! the report to t¥eCommission at the meeting. (3) The applicant:', s-hownon the plat the ded1esU.on of ,tñeadditional right of way along Smithfield ~das. required, by ,the Thorøu&hfa:. ,Pun. He also proposes to enter into a çoven&ì1t .greement with the City'to p . his portion of the costs of the future tmptovements to the street when ft- i. :1.mproved to a four lane Coll~ctor Street. . , . RECOMMENDATION: The Plann:J,.n.8: s~dton1ng COI8i.sion approvedtheq Final Plat of Lot 1, . ,. , ) " Block 1, Bathman Additiona8pre.eutedin.Plat Application PS8S-70. \. J Finance Review Acct. Number . Sufflcl~nt Funds AvalJable 'K'!!1~(~ . Head Slgnature'''¡~anager CITY COUNCIl.. ACTION I~~M '. '':' ~': . Finance Dll1Iclor .":: :-"<.:';"Y' >':. ,'.. "v,<, " > ,: ~ ,\:;;;:~::\~:t:f~tL~N~~¡::,~t:~::: :"_:~;,'k:~ 'iL;;:;, 1 .., \ '. - . ,,-.:, 1109 "\.. R-2 r - ;~ ". - - II II II Ii ¡ a., I i Q' : ¡ : : : ¡ ! ! ¡ I ~I ~ ; ; : , .;. _."';::P'rL I U--' t:: : : ~ : '..--' _:__ -:- I-i L "'-i >- _________-'-..__.,' H" ,......, >- £Q....!'!SC'.IA>-_- _ _.., -..', ' ~, L '- : :AG', " " ,~" : ~____...:' " :. t:~ I :--: 10 : 11153 ..', _----- R I r-¡-;\r I -__i_ i---u-~~~,~~------ ~ tjti'F1 ~ R-2-1~1 --~-.-------.:: t:!=ª ¡---r-i;- "" : 1:;1-------- ~'t'J-. I I ~ ~----- ___:: :a:: I ~ ~.' I~+· ~~·~~mT! ~ ~~oo I~_ ' ,T~: I i I J}' I ."w, , '..l, L,Ld~1 I'E ¡R-, ,k~ 1 i 'I I,~ /'-'v': I lo~ I ! ! ¡ I í I, V ,-,;:-'f-- -LLL' , L.'OO.O'oo 0 ,-< ~ t--I "~ , I ! I ,''-Tl~ ¡....::~l: ,.-c ì- ~ ~__! . ~~ "~'. ~_7~ =_ ç ~ '----, r---r--i----s:.::·~ - Þr--H :-: . 'h-:;,.L~ = -.1--l--4 :- ~ ('~..r - = ,L--L-.; ------; ........~ì~ :::: = ~ f ""'çT1}:~-t:- ImR =t:=i ' J . hO,...... :~ R-2 ~ 'J.:..¡ -~t--~ 1175 ~~ ' il-\\'t ~ ! ='CI:: ¡ . I ~::J., = AG I , ~___ -=t:::: - i :1 -,-,...:- - .. , I .~' " i ~: !,+.......j/~..-J--:' I H-. :=\.l /!;E:::;t;¿.--.::::: T -~~¡ I ~, ~... .,.. ~'v[ ,..~--.. ¡t.-...¡--' -~\ .. I .1. , : I ,,! ':-a~ -....... 1-..,- F,;~ :i'J¡;::':" --' '2>:- h"'2 . . !þ;=I t~!,'" ~: _ ~: ~~~~.. --:------. -' i' I; ;-3 ~:i- :--=--\ e.ZJ ~ !~-+1:: .~ ~~_.. ~ ' -r--!"- ....., ;"-~" ~ L . _03_ I~!i "1~- I -ç-v ./'"' , :;; 1--1 ,~_-¡¡-'-----:-:r-- ,- 1/' C - 2 dr~9 . I . I I '~---< I I - 2 J.....t::;:.:\"....-:. ~H-i.1 ' ,L !:L..-Y·:'., A G t::= t::J--.; I . ,r- I ~ ,.::: /' . .' R-2 ' . - êl..'.:l.'·i.:'=.' C- I' C-I ~:~..'.ict-~~r..-:.: 117' ~.¡;; :~L j'i. L~. - ~ :: ~~i '{ .~r- -- ~~2' ....,.,.---- !', ~i.::1 . ..~ t:!:'121' :..:..;~ ,~~- ~ ___~. R-1-MF ~_~.,.', '~~-:~ J ~-:H-- ~ ~~~ ., III ...-,.,-~ ~ _::1t. =- ¡.......;' V !...,.~: i _I' .~R-2 '-"--,,-----;1'·-- ~ ; "I".: I Ii: I: I I !)- ~'80 ' '., h J t ~~7ffi·'~~-·-L-; ~~=~-- E112 \ ~-\-_............. - I-----i ~=-: c.._._ ' : =- ,I~" ~.-t'=sç:~- a~~C: I.~ { _~. .. _~¿...._.:--- i ~ ' 1~: 1-, '--. _ [ Ç;\ _ "r- ' ' ---- "~ ~ [_:.......1....;, -.' _ H ., .. -=,- :'".ï....--.:.~ -~, _ !<r-' - ~ - ¡---<' ,J' ~ .,: - .-.=. ;.Jit"E.;k" - ç----< I- - ~.- -;. , .... - ~ --,-- ¿] .. -"-. . t=:.~i}_/ .5= ~ R - 2 t::.-~;:R~ -~~:_=-:t"'1 -;, I ! J-...! - _ I==,-~~::'-- ' ,V~ "I L..¡J : I 1--1....'- __ - - c=:=-'.', , ~J-;;";/'.../ ..("~ ¡pi T>~i.... 0 --:~ ~ ,.¿:::- ......:... t"¡<; ~ AG W= ~¡~ I ~=-~F: r: ......;~ 0 -.; -i--.....t-! LJ ~..............-.--- .,.+'0 ~.. . ...,rL.- ~ ~ - kg- '" L....,j I .- ~j -:H" -- ,.--- I' . , ' - "" - ~ _~ , "6 I ',~:\. ;··-·16... 'I --- R-3 ~" :J i '.h! ' :,; T - . ... I \ '('.." ., '.... 1T ~·(~t..,..-1""""": ~-I. ,_rlf'-.L ::;--_ _ R-I- ~f~-. < ,- -?,' .--L.. ~ 1800~c;"\~ R_?' ---:7 - '==1 I . I R-31151 , ~ ~ rJõõ èf - - - - ,;;;; - ." ~u ~~ ~' ~ I I . ~ ~ ?$-wT1-- ' , .~~lf ' I., ':{"'f.J~ AG ! I R-2 AG - R-3 IZ.8 ~~, ,,.z "'1 - >-\ - .\:~~i -~~ F~; ~ , 'J r ~ r ·..~ot~~! I'~ ~' '¡......I'.,,'1 ,[r=-; - . f- -.J~ E:~:-t: - _.t:: :¡;...Jtr¡ : - r,. . ~=~~~~~ ~--;"Tì 'I, - , . ;'I--J L.k.Jrr Å:~ .' .. ~ ~-nTl.-11 U .=rD~ oo¡ i.Ü~o;~J::~=S>- ~....... .~,,>-<-'u"'y:":" J=11- ; .~ :'Lj tu ¿ : 'it rj" ilt ~ -1 _ --rm. .' I ' --CI r-c.~ ~ L J l I _ ~"-L] III L I, "-'-'..:. ;-.. I : ' i . tj-j, ""'ill flt I ~~>-f)\~~.'- I -; \. \' i I.L...._, /~ H'-- R-211 :: ~....... ~_~ "0 1/321! _ ~ ~ ~ò '-/;-( ~U¡--:I ~_.i ¡ i. :¡ \'\ ~r--!1.) ____HI I ~~~;:A~ -f'1 " . '.~:-j '\-.~~~fC~ ~ ~ ~~~~~I Þ~::: -~LW.-L-r -\ G . I .!'~ ~ .....-1'.j ii' :-, 'r-: 1----.,.......... _ _ - ·illTT"IJ t: ' 4Y : _ ~""""l~ :::~_: I !li ¡ I~ I r--- ~--$IH I J:5 -'4:r IT ; ~ \"" ~ -==' -=~- ~-.:~~~~ ~·--"T-F,-r-~ f--.' r--~:-r--- ~ , .~.....f'I-¡--:-- t::. ::::~--:H;' :::::: ' . .~!/ r I ¡ = -=- . \ - AG '~ Ii 1 ! . iT! ~ -, AG ~ AG - . - AG R-2 "'8 . R-2 liZ' - i I! [Ii ~ . ¡ I~ r: ,,>I ..¡ - -- - , , AG .~I:j:~ ! ~ R-I œ¡ r: (.~ _ ::¡ t'1G . _ , , f\t' I ~ .., -e' ~.I'I(. ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, OCTOBER la, 1985 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. Don. Bowen John Schwinger Mark Wood Joe Hallford Carole Flippo Richard Royston Wanda Calvert ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members ember of Planning/Dev. P & Z Coordinator ABSENT: Marjorie Nash Mr. Wood made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0 with Ms. Flippo abstaining since she was not present at the meeting. -- Chairman Bowen stated the first two requests is on the same piece of property and would be heard together. 1. PS 85-67 Request of Charles D. & Patricia Bathman for preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Bathman Addition. . 2. PS 85-70 Request of Charles D. & Patricia Bathman for final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Bathman Addition.. Scott Stewart with Levitt Engineers came forward. Chairman Bowen asked about the percolation test. Mr. Stewart stated he had it with him. PS 85-67 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 85-67. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. ~ . .,\~, Page 2 ( P & Z Minutes October 10, 1985 PS 85-70 APPROVED 3. PS 85-68 PS 85-68 APPROVED 4. PS 85-69 PS 85-69 APPROVED '- 5. PS 85-72 PS 85-72 APPROVED 6. PS 85-73 --- Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-70. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Jeff Marsh for preliminary plat of Lots 1-16, Block 23, Kingswood Estates. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 85-68. This motion as seconded by Mr. Hallford and he motion carried 4-0 with Mr ood abstaining. & Roger and Lot 3R-1, Joan Hanson for Block 1, Martin Ms. Flippo PS 85-69. Mr. Schwi 5-0. the motion to approve is motion was seconded by er and the motion carried Req st of Hanson Properties for p liminary plat of Lots 1-7, Block 1, ob Hill North Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve , PS 85-72. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Re,quest of Burk Collins Investments, Inc. for replat of Lots ,lR & 2R, Richland Oaks Addition. Jackie Fluitt with Stembridge and Associates came forward to represent Mr. Collins. He stated he talked to Mr. Royston and found they have a problem with platting a portion of a lot. He said they would just replat Lots 1, 2, and 3. Chairman Bowen said that would take care of it. - (/ . KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Rich1and Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-809. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BATHMAN ADDITION, LOT 1 BLOCK 1. PREL. AND FINAL PLAT. PS 85 - 70. GRID MAP 42 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Utility companies should be contacted to determine if any additional easements are required to serve this development. 2 The plans indicate that an existing water service line crosses the Lone Star Gas Company easement which is located along the north side of this easement. If an easement, or agreement with Lone Star Gas for permission to locate the water service line across their easement does not exist, then such permission or easement should be obtained for the record. 3 One foot contour intervals should be shown on the proposed development area based on an actual field survey of the property. The USGS 10-foot contour interval map is sufficient only for delineating drainage area divides. 4 Plans for sanitary sewer servfce to this property have not been provided. If a septic system is to be used then plans showing spreader field layouts should be provided and percolation tests taken with results furnished to th e Hea lth Department for revi ew and approva 1. 5 The distances on the north and south line should be made to the new right-of-way line on the plat and the metes and bounds description. 6 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing 12-inch water line along the north of the lot. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of an equivalent 8-inch line for a total length of 634.98 feet. 7 The owner should escrow his prorata share of future improvements on Smithfield Road. - 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 - Subdivision Rp.view Lett\;'Î continued 1 j BATHMAN ADDITION 8 We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been provided for this lot based on the 500 foot radius requirement. 9 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Pl~~nY~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: t4r. Rodger N. Line,City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development - September 19, 1985 PS 85 - 70 PAGE 2 ( JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC. f ~ ENGINEERS · PLANNERS 39Z1 VANCE ROAD . FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 . Z84-0981 October 1, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lot 1, Block 1 BATHMAN ADDITION Dear Mrs. Calvert: Pursuant to the City Engineer's letter dated September 19, 1985, we offer the following replys: 1. No exceptions taken. 2. The exisiting water service has been shown incorrectly. The plans have been revised to reflect the actual location where the service enters the subject property. 3. As no public works improvements are being planned for the subject property, the Developer is respectfully requesting that the requirement for two feet (2') contours be waived. 4. Percolation tests, along with a septic system application, have been submitted to the Tarrant County Health Department. 5. The boundaries as described in the dedication agreement are to the existing title boundarie~. We are of the opinion that any additional land being dedicated for:public right-of-way must be included within the described boundaries for title to pass to the City. 6. The pro-rata for tne water line has previously been paid for the portion of the eight inch (8") water line along Keller-Smithfield road as is evidenced by the enclosed receipts. 7. The developer is requesting that he be allowed to enter into a covenant agreement concerning the future improvements to Keller-Smithfield Road. 8. The exisitng fire hYdrants near the sUbject property have been added to the water layout sheet and adequate fire coverage is presently being provided. 9. No exceptions taken. ,-' .. (" ( Planning and Zoning Commission October 10, 1985 Page 2 We trust that tnese comments are sufficient to allow the City to process our application for Preliminary/Final Plat approval. Should you need any further information, please dO not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC. Stewart, E.!.T. cc Mr. - H-~y GPC-0664 (, ..I ps !ó-70 SOIL TEST REPORT r .1 L ^b~·~~ DATE: -.J SEPß,S APPLICANT: Name ;}DHN. Street or P.O. Box City ·_NOR!\-{ PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot ~ Block ~ Subdivision ~) Street/Roaå Address Ø+) 5E.. ßv"'tSE'f tt f:-EL1-~- Unincorporated Area (..¡) _ or City ~œ.\h 'R\.Q-l\A~.tI Additional Information l:tù.l\.\\)\ (qJo LDCA-C-e:ò B ~ {ÜJ.£Jt.- SMl lE.l..~ RoAA.5 E. Ls,\TT &GINffR.S. -::W-c.. , 392.1 \/ANc..E. ' RU:".H.lA tv D H \ L..l-S Phone Z84-0981 State TE.-,(As Zip 76:>1/8 SCHEMA TIC OF LOT OR TRACT reflecting the following: :rs Ec- '"'( !. Compass North, adjacent street(s), direction of slope, property lines with linear footage. 2. Location of (numbered) soil percolation and subsoil test holes (show distance of each hole from property line or other easily discernible point). ' dl- ø£e~ B\)~ 1/5 SCA<...E : .1"~jrol (t;.l.G?E \ AfrM'I.J N f -¡ 3. Location of existing or proposed water wells. , J::::=,.". s~ 'B_1 ~, ~ e,- z. 5. Additional infnrmation that muy influence the function of proposed system - W::."T.51BE ':. 2·15 Ac.Rß - "bES\c..CATlvN Ç.AAck .:5\1SÇ>€L.-u:ð :vJ ~~R.\~6. ß-"Z... C"'.IJ\ o~SEr_\l~) ~~-3. 4. Location of natural, constructed or proposed drainage ways, water impoundment areas, cut or fill banks, buildings. r Goo1 5.;---..1 PERCOLATION RESULTS: (If Cree or seep ground wa ter is encountered, show location and indicate approximale deplh.) Test No. '8-\ 'D-2.. ß-.3 Depth of Hole 34'\ 28\1 28" Minutes per Inch FaIl IlJ 20 j t)' x -5 III I/} Go :J: Percol..ti.II' lests to be executed within proposed lateral fj"ld areu. arlequutely defining soil conditions exi!'ting in area tu " deplh of proposed lateral ditches (21\ inch min. 10 36 inch max.). Tests 10 he conducted us specified in A GI.lJDE TO THE DISPOSAL OF HOUSEHOLD SEWAGE (Texa:; Departm('nt of Heallh Re~ources) or as w- Cuired br !he Tarrant County lI.,alth D"partm('nt. Ovcrnir,hl Hnd .tCll'qlwte soil swelling must be allowed prior to ony mt'CH¡u·"ments of record. SUBSOIL TEST RESULT: ( If Cre... or ""up ground water is ellclIunl,·red, indicate depth Cound alld Cinal static level.) Depth of Texture , , Q.C) to I.s \.S' ~ b.\;)' Classificatio ~Ro.NN S\L"'t"t "StN.D SM-S-t> - ~('t.aVVN 'slWO"t CL)(\-t CL SUb!!oillest(s) to be executed within the proposed lateral field area 10 a minimum depth of six feet. The Unified Soil Classifkation Sustem or other approved reporling melhod shall be used. Ð. S\"TJi... ÞRP4Ñf\6.'l.. 'To "'t1--IE 'BI\s-t SITE COMMENTS: Signature Firm James Address 6935 à Yes Yes Yes Yes ./ No =$ No No No Presence of upper water shed Presence of adjacent ponds, streams, water impoundment area. Existing or proposed water well in nearby area. Organized sewage disposal service available to lot or tract ATTESTED BY: s· Eng~neer Texas 76112 State Registration No, 37ï81 Phone 817-429-2346 It should be understood that the test data and other information given in this report does not cover nor infer approval for the in$tallation of the individual septic hink system(s). The design. construction and installation of each system is based upon the specific conditions affecting each lot or tract and must be sUbsequently reviewed and approved by the Tarrant County Health Department. (Report to be submitted in duplicate with appropriate application and filing fee to the Tarrant county) Department of Public Health, 1800 University Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76107. Phone 335.8551 r ./ ( - TARRANT COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 300 square feet minimum lateral bottom trench area required per bedroom (two bedroom minimum). Lateral system to encompass soil percolation test area. Mini- mum safe distances and grade compatibilities must be observed. Although soil percolation test mean is ac- ceptable, submitted subsoil test reflects soil condi- tions that are poor for septic system implementation. Favorable consideration for additional lateral line square footage over the required minimum may preclude possible subsequent costly system repairs and/or addi- tions. Should free or seep water be encountered at any point during system excavation, that area must be blocked off, refilled with impervious soil, compacted in an approved manner, and another approved, dry area found and utilized. This De artment stron 1 recom- mends that se tic tank sand lateràl field be ro- tecte in an approved manner from possiblestòrmdrain- age surface or subsurface flow from any eXisting upper watershed. Lot surface cuts and/or fills disallowed after execution of soil tests without prior approval of TCHD. System design and construction materials to comply with established standards. If additional in- formation or clarification is indicated, please con- tact Tarrant County Health Department. -- NOTE: 1. Septic system lateral line trenches should not exceed 30 inches in depth. 2. Surficial sands should be used to backfill lat- eral lines. 3. Due to the size of the proposed residence, it is recommended that the system be installed for a five bedroom house and 1500 gallons septic tank capacity. APPROVED: ð~ (}.~) R.~ LawrenceC. Prine, R.S. September 18, 1985 df : - ; l L I L... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Develop'lJlent vubject: Plat ,~~liCatiou liots l-R and 2-R., Richland Oaks . !t:í.~ . Council Meeting Date: 10/28/85 Agendé Number: PS 85-73 L- I l I l I ~ i ì 1 This Replat Applicat1,ou 18 presented for consideration of Lots 1-1. and 2-R Richland Oaks Addition. The p~ope~ty ,is 1,oèated on the northeast comer of Bedfo~d luless Road and Strummer Drive. The-purpose for the proposed replat is to COIDbine the existing residential type lots'i-n,to,two commercial tracts for developmènt. The applicants plans are to construct a commercial center on the site. In the zoning deliberâtious .on this tract the applicant cOllll81ted to several improvements to the adjacent street. Bedford Ruless Road. and to the signal system. which is adjacent to his property and. provide.aceess to Loop 820 at this location. These improvements have been included in the.ensineering submittal accompanying this plat. All of the street modifications proposed 41'e within the City of Hurst and within the right of way of the freeway which is. the responsibility of the State Departm.ent of· Bigbwqs and Public Transportation. . Both c>f thse agencies must also app1'o"le thè. proposed improvements prior to construction.. Att" tl'emod1f1eations to the street have' ba4aa completed the Commission and the City Council shouldíive serious consideration to the possibility of a City boundary adjustment whieh.:would al4a place all of the street right of way in the City of Hurst as is the ease attheyresent time. The Staff noted one significant p1'oblem with the proposed plat· as submitted. The '1 applicant's ownership is shoWn as all of the existing Lots 1 t 2, and 3 and a portion of . Lot 4. The appl:1canthas included .all of his holdings in the proposeü plat. However, he í has not accountedfor.t~eré1llainde1' of the existing Lot 4, as required by the Ordinance. , '-.,.,./ The applicant has :1ød.1catéd that the adjacent owner of the retnainder of Lot 4 is not I willing to cooperate in the nec.ssary replat based upon his opposition to the entire i commercial proposal of the app.licant. At tlJe hearing the applicant agreed to revise his replat to include only those lots, 1,2, and'3, which he has under his control in order not to delay the consideratiftof his'plat. This proposal was acceptable to the Commission. I I I I T I I T ¡ T I I r t 1- ~ All of the Engineer's comments have been satiEtfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Plaœ1n¡ añd Zoning Commission approved the RepIat of Lots lR and 2R, Richland Oaks Addition aspresent~d in Plat Åpplicat~011 PS 85-73. Finance Review Acct. Number SufflcJent Funds Available II J/ L ¡(14/~ nt Head Signature . 'City Manager - CITY 'COUNCIL ACTION ITEM. \ , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 ~ u J -I I I , , , I I , I I I , , I I , I I I -I , ,4 .:-\ /" ~ flTlffi~~ I ! ¡ 1 F~"~' I-I ~ .t"· ~ - : ...~ . . ~ ,..~ \\.~ ~.....'~ ... ..l(;~W "," t~'" ~'f"':>.,!.,... ~ c.(,; ,,! . 1 \0.... d ^,...~ \ \ , , , , AG: \ F.p.~ I I I I I , , , AG u ~'.J~ ;..",. (J ~\ r ~ c.' t>.i ~~Ý;' \O~ " .~". ~ \ ; .-- ! 1 ! I II I ; I Ii I ~ / I ~ " ~ , / I I - I 2-21-S5 IOS7, 1090, 1091, 1092 1093, 1094, 1095, 1096 1\ 1097, 1100, 1104, 1105 1193,1194,1I~5.1196 1197, IlgS, 1200,12011 ' 1202,1203,1204,120S: ~ \ . . .....'\~ '("'" f ~ I. Page 2 () P & Z Minutes October 10, 1985 '-- ----.-.- -_. .-----. . -- - ---- ~ ~. ____.... _.....õ._ . _. - ~.- --- PS 85-70 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 85-70. This motion was seconded Mr. Hallford and the motion carri 5-0. 3. PS 85-68 Request of Jeff Marsh for plat of Lots 1-16, Bloc Estates. PS 85-68 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger ma approve PS 85- This motion was seconded by r. Hallford and the motion ca ied 4-0 with Mr. Wood abstai "ng. 4. PS 85-69 R est of David Barfield & Roger and oan Hanson for replat of Lot 3R-1, Block 1, Martin Addition. PS 85-69 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 85-69. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 5. PS 85-72 Request of Hanson Properties for preliminary plat of Lots 1-7, Block 1, NOD Hill North Addition. - Mr. Wood made the motion to approve - PS 85-72. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried __ ~D.. 6. PS 85-73 Request of Burk Collins Investments, Inc. for replat of Lots 1R & 2R, Richland Oaks Addition. Jackie Fluitt with Stembridge and Associates came forward to represent Mr. Collins. He stated he talked to Mr. Royston and found they have a problem with platting a portion of a lot. He said they would just replat Lots 1, 2, and 3 instead of Lots 1, 2, 3, and a portion of 4. Chairman Bowen said that would take care of it. i\_" ;t~.'" . Page 3 ~ P & Z Minutes October la, 1985 PS 85-73 APPROVED 7. PS 85-74 ( Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 85-73 with the amendment. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of JPI Land, Inc. for preliminary plat of Foster Village Addition, Section 19. Owen D. Long, Engineer, came f He stated they had responded 0 the City Engineer's comments. e said a portion of this plat i a replat. Mr. Long stated they a requesting a change in the Thorou fare Plan. He said Starnes Road an east-west collector. He s d they request that Crosstimbers b used instead of Meadowview T race because it does not get out to ightower. He said they do not w to have Valley View wider to joi John Autrey Road. ' Mr. ong said they do not wish to d Bicate additional right-of-way on ufe Snow Drive. He said Rufe Snow has already been widened to 80 feet and do not feel they should have to give more. - Mr. Long said they would work with the : City Staff regarding the water lines. / . Chairman Bowen stated the Thoroughfare Plan calls for Rufe Snow Drive to be 110 feet. Mr. Long asked if they plan to tear out what has just been finished. Chairman Bowen stated he was not sure of the timetable, but it would have to be done someday. Mr. Long stated his client had rather not give the right-of-way. " -No comment ~ '.: .,,-.,,",,-¡".. ,.!,' afire hydrant at the northwest corner to provide the necessary fire coverage. ;,.' "," , ".1. (~ 1 We have added our project We are correctly preparing all the necessary documents and will provide the city with executed documents prior the beginning construction of the project. ; , 1 ! " ';'; ,<;. 7. The Developer is aware that he is responsible for all ¡, provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning i.. Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures and all other applicable City Development Codes. '"! , . , ~ ,! ¡ .-, ',"J .:!~ . j:.. ·-:"t :~' " v .. ( ( .. there should be any questions~ please call. , , -;.t:''X. - -~- 'f;~~~~-I:~, ,i -~:~'~;'~~l~ ~ . ...... ~- "ti.. -....~.~ ";',f~~,::i~~~¡~<::~ ,'~1 ...._.,,~;.iL~::c~,~~. "~...,~,,,_-w_,,--1¡ii,~~;Æ[.?:~ ·"'i't.-; ~ ~ ,'" :. ,...... ~ '\ , ~....- ( ( . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas October 1, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-890, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION, LOTS 1R and 2R, REPLAT, PS 85 - 73, GRID MAP 133 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 A hydraulics study of the Walker Branch which crosses this proposed development site has been prepared by Anderson Engineers, Inc., and a detailed report has been submitted to our office for review. This report, along with construction plans should be submitted to FEMA for review and approval. A sample transmittal letter has been prepared by the Developer's Hydraulics Engineer, and a copy is attached to this review letter. This letter should be retyped on North Richland Hills letterhead stationery and signed by the City Manager. This letter along with the Hydraulics Report and approved final construction plans should be transmitted to FEMA at the address noted on the letter, after approval of the plans by the Commission and City Council. 2 The Bedford-Euless Road traffic, detQur plan sheets should be sealed by a registered professional engineer. 3 Traffic signalization modification plans for the Bedford-Eu1ess Road improvements should be submitted to the City and the State Highway Department for review. Consideration should be made regarding integration of the proposed signalization plans with future interchange improvements plans. Immediate as well as long range planni~g considerations should be made. 4 An existing 10-inch sanitary sewer line located along the existing channel is being abandoned and replaced with a new 10-inch line to clear the drainage easement for construction of the proposed multi-box culvert. We would recommend that this line segment be replaced with an estimated 15-inch sewer main and that the City participate in the difference in a 10-inch and 15-inch line. If this larger diameter line is not constructed now, the City will be required to construct a future parallel line when the watershed becomes fully developed and existing sewer line capacity is exceeded. Additional future capacity may also be required if sewerage 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRD/267-3367 I"',~ ,. , ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION flow from all or part of the Mesquite Branch watershed is diverted to the Walker's Branch watershed when the Mesquite Branch area develops. The recommended 15-inch line size is tentative. The actual size required depends on the results of a demographics study of the Walker's Branch watershed which the City should have prepared, and the results of the Mesquite Branch study which is presently in progress. 5 We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been shown for this addition based on the 300 foot radius requirement for commercial zoning. A fire hydrant, on a 4-inch water line, is located approximately 500-feet south of the northwest corner of this plat on the west side of Strummer Drive. We would suggest adding a fire hydrant 300-feet south of the northwest corner of this plat on the proposed 8-inch water line. 6 An area outside the proposed platted area along the east side of this proposed development is shown to be used for construction of an underground six barrel box culvert and for a parking lot area. An easement outside the platted area for drainage, sanitary sewer, and parking is required from each of the adjacent property owners. Executed copies of these easements should be furnished to the City. 7 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~VJ.~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development October 1, 1985 PS 85 - 73 PAGE 2 If·" ~ ) ( ( September 6, 1985 Mr. R. Dell Greer, PE FEMA - Region VI Natural & Technological Hazards Division Federal Center Denton, Texas 76201 re: Walker Branch - North Richland Hills, Texas Request for Map Revision Review " Dear Mr. Greer: The City of North Rièhland Hills is part of the rapidly growing Fort Worth Dallas Metroplex area and as such is in a constant state of change. This submittal is a request for FEMA reviews and determinations for approval of proposed changes in alignment, floodplain, and designated floodway of a segment of Walker Branch in the effective· Flood Insurance Study (FIS) in the City of North 'Richland Hills, Texas. Walker Branch is a part of the City's effective FIS; additionally, future improvements are proposed in this ~tudy reach as o~tlined in a report to the City of 1985, entitled, "North Richland Hi lls Drainage Plan," by Knowl ton-English-Flowers, Inc. of Fort Worth. The accompanying report of September 6, 1985. prepared for Stembridge & Associates, Inc., of North Richland Hills, by Anderson Engineers, Inc., of Dallas, includes full information on both the existing . conditions and the proposed revisions. The report has been reviewed by our City engineer, Knowl to_n-English-Flowers of Fort Worth, and has been approved by the City- of North Richland Hills and found satisfactory in support of a development permit to revise the channel and floodway as proposed. We support these revisions as presented. The following technical data are included in the report for your use in making the necessary determinations of compliance with FÈMA standards: 1 . Printouts of HEC-2 computer models representing the current FIS model, 2. Floodway HEC-2 computer models of both existing and proposed floodways. 3. Proposed channel improvements HEC-2 computer models, 4. Floodway data tables for existing and, proposed conditions, ~ . ~ .' ( ( 5. Workmaps showing deliniations, and both the current and .. base flood 6. Narrative prepared by a registered professional engineer explaining the parameters of the study. In addition, you should note that a portion of the improvements are based on future development; however, this future work is not necessary at this time to eliminate impacts upstream, but erosive velocities are expected. The City of North Richland Hills will maintain the channel until the future work is completed or require the developer to post a maintenance bond with which the City will obtain fµnds for maintaining the structure as designed. Since the City of North Richland Hills is a participant in the Federal Insurance Program, it is not required, that the State of Texas approve the proposed channel improvements which we have approved in principal; however, upon receipt of construction documents from the developers, the City of North Richland Hills will submit copies of the proposed channel improvements to the the Texas Department of Water Resources. , We would appreciate your review and comment on this request for determination of compliance for a map reV2S2on as soon as possible. If you need further information or supporting documentation, please advise. Sincerely, City Manager City of North Richland Hills, Texas : 2 . 1-- L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS D~partment: \ Planning and Devel()pment SUbject: Request for Sign Or4inance Variance . 6440 Rufe Snow Drive Council Meeting Date: 10/28/85 Agenda Number: SO 85-13 William R. Waugh Company is currently developing a tract in the North park Plaza Shopping Center as a Burger Street Drive-Thru Restaurant. They wish to be able to erect a pole sign on the site. The Sign Ordinance requires tbat a lot or tract have at least (100) feet of street frontage in order to qualify for a pole or ground sign installation per section 4.2-fof the Ordinance. The sUQject property is only (94) feet wide. The proposed sign will meet all of the other criteria of the Ordinance as to location, size, and etc. l I ~ l l 1 I 1 , I i i 1 1 RECOMMENDATION: The Staff has determined that the proposed, sign can be permitted should the Council approve the variance to the minimum lot width required. 1 1 1 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) OQ ng Budget her - Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ 1 I I I 12~ , .. Ignature ... City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM' . Finance Director \ I . I L ;, ,···y;;;.,'\:;<~";?':0'\,» >"t-; Page10f_~ -r- I \ \ I J I ) ~) 1')'\)\))\1\ (\" / \ J \ / J \, I"~ . \ \ ¡ I 1\ July 19, 1985 City Council of North Richland Hills ',-, - p .0. Box-18609 -- -.--. 'I 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 .. ,......- , , Dear Council Members: -1 Please place us on your agenda at the first oppor- tunity in order for us to present a formal request for a sign variance of ordinance #1001. We are purchasing Lot 4 in the North Park Plaza addition. The lot is 94 feet (front) by 125 feet. Our request is for permission to erect a pylon sign on this lot. , If you need additional information prior to the meeting don't hesitate to call me at (214) 934-9340. Please notify me as to when you will be meeting to discuss this request. Thank you for yo~r ~ime and cooperation. ,"¡ : -¡ I ' l ! ! ¡ Sincerely, ~~~7 ! TM:bay ., ", ---..-....-.......-. O~l1 GR.. CWlfugh ." rum .@a.1ltl6èlllre O:Ølllle 18-¡0 . S4.2o.(,13 J :Jiœnnp ~ 'L(mrf ?J24O " (24);-J34:9.340 .~-~_. -- .---. ~.. . . "~_.'-"'. ._. _._,._-~.- - ....-.'.- ~._.- - --"'---'7-- .;,.... . '. o - ~ I (n )-1- riD m'm .. I ¡ ~¡\\\ "\ ~ m c;< ::: ,» i-i 1- ilO IIZ h !it'} ¡' Ii \II r- .:Q I {í\ !J\J\ I! .1- J:\J i~ j:7 L~ j'() I' ~,~ ;'r ~ ., I I C', ~ 01 , ! , ~'\ I IZ" 21" ;~\-JI I ,.....,; --,r i~1 ¡ I JL ! ~~ I , 0"1 ---1FJt!t':¡ \ ~I 0 :: , I' , I " I toO :: , ! ¡I i '. l- '''. -L ': I .¡ :. ~: ilt~ "~ . ~t I' ; , , þ~-==-_._-- ¡~~ ¡ , I ! II; . , ' , Ir ¡.-----' i' "- I '. ; ,- 'N !j)' Î\ (J\ ,. 7\ í '" \'ti r ., m \)\--\ ~c ,,7- II -: , o » " 1-< ¡C> IC I~ :: T 10 ; ,- :..J ::. J, [t U\ "" II' í C!< ~ ! ¡ ~ , I 1\.9 " ì l ,- I '. V1 , - ,0 -: I I '\- - _ q-" ----.- 7" -- --_._-~_.,--p..- - ~ --~ -.J ,; r"\< \, \/ ~ ',,-./ -~- rJ ! ¡ -! ··-___s ~ "::7 - -.--...- .~-_. - . .,.. i I ! -'- - , I ) I;, , .:--\../ 1---· -----; ~-~ '-~~=_ .10- I I ¡ If) ! " , " II: " t i, ['I I' 1r " L: ~ ~j ¡ !I I ,i,l+- ¡ I ! , \: i , ' I ¡ I' ¡ II ! ! I' ¡ Hrl'I' . , i >--- , '.. i n " r: " Ii " II " jl , , " ¡ ,I :: I' ,I :: ¡' ~ I \I ! :: llJ i I 104 I b=-;.~ - ;~--~: ---~~j: E=::-=------. ----- o ¡.-=:_=-._.__--:-.~_.-=-~ o /.--- ..... -- f:I.-l..-~1<- fl..L c:¡1o~<\ \(~ì...L'{ ~K.¿~N ,t>.;)L(,:<'W' ~ 2.\ c.;K.~e.,,1 ~~O~.\ 0'J'1LIH-¿ (GO 1-'\") WHlí~ M~1^L. f}..CI£ Cf-\.,Io.,t-1Nf..L. t..;TRS. W/L.74-034 K~L-L-Y Cì<'ISt:H :)UT'S\f)~ R¡:;'íV1<..ÑS, í'JJO 1'0 ít\1<-(,~ -ru¡.-.:v:::, ;+ ~c:.D Ñ¡¿ð,..J Il...LUM _ MIS1'AL 13~¡:;', f'l---\, 00+033 ¡KOPIC C....!<'£t~.! A\lJL- ~ ¡¿IF, -- ~OI-iCí 5íR.\\"~;' fll"j, PM? 4e,~ RËP . MIi/~<;"íRtF~S f!t--L í"'MS Ie;: ORANG¿ St-\Of'-í ";1~lf~':- FI~. FM5 1~7 Yt::L.Lð'µ FII.-L.¡¿¡<' &- ~1}--"1"~:¿'r::- rl¡..\. PM$ \:Þ5 ORAt--1G-t!:E 73t8 Wr\\í~ r-[,~)< f=,KC,\/. .¡J!H,Aí C. .Ii 0 n' 2\08 G.~E-N PL..IE,Y-CD['y. INí(n~Å.:- i36:;MA F~ÙD~, (...N-\'f' \L.L..U/-..\I....I^íið~-l, i..--·-----P. 4>?Ù ¡"¡-'DKí fi N, C;-'1 r) ~,+ K¡;ó LL'( ~ R:';:.E"I.J I, I I I ,) -_/~ --... \ j ~;z:>~ ~~ '-.ÎI '("ð -.. ~ '£ " VI.\... 1 [1' I f 1 JJ C .,., m en z o :E ~ ~ -~~ IJ\ CJ :D - < m }- 1'-- r-= :t= ~ f-- f-- ~ , r- , ~-..- ' ~--- , ,I .r- r-- r-- ~~- ~-- r- f \' . /25-À .,~ .....\.../ ,,\ \ '. ,. , " . , , ;" .. .. ..._À.'. .. ./,,,,,'À.\', ,/ /',,\ '. . /'.' ;' '\" , '. \ ;... . ~, ~ -\-¡ =".1, 3\ ~ N 0. @ ~ CD 0. \ \ , \ íLLWJ\ ' d r - - -~ \' \ \ I \ I' , ~ ' ~f / ~ . .\~ 7 \ \ : " '",\. ;&.\ " \ , , \ . " \ "\, , '\ \\ :1 : I " .(, y \ \: Ir[~ II I I I ¡ l.l11 I I ¡ I, : i Ii 1\ : :'. ·l\ : .-J [J]I ~J r' ' l ,"- \ - \ '---, ' [\ L~_~-~ l_ \,',' , , .... ..- '.. ~ .. ~ ~ . .. .. .. S'O ~S-13 \ \ ( '. , <..: \ " \ \ \ ) .( CIJ ::I: ,~ 0 "tI CIJ , r m -. \ 0 (') -, JJ " ) l c m C> JJ 0 CIJ ::I: 0 ) "tI . CIJ -- . _. I .. i ~ 22 f;e-f ~m ,,- ~ -C ,- r- 0= » z' :c c " m (J) z @; m ö"d >~ >-30 t:z:1~ .. t:z:1 o t-3 Z, ~ .. Z'~ o ," \JIll þ:;' d· ¡.;;¡' ::q .: þ:;. þj. õ~ ~ t1j: t-t. > š~ ~. ~·rn '"~~ ~g; oo~ ~ ~oo 101 t.;)o 000 c:,cø 01 ~. ,- Z', P 0' '-~ j~f h. ~~.' I ~rJi xç I ~ tJ ':'::; ::-plliI, z5 _: 'I i ;;:C ~= 1 i . .. ~ ~~! ..c:--.:L,0 ~~ ~~ &r; "1<: 24'·0" ~ 11r¡' ~ : ~ . 0- ! .. I ¡ . ¡ I l " - ~ 12'2~~ :n ~ I ~ r:--:: ~ ~! » 1:¡ ~.\!~~> ~ ~ ~ e Š ~ ~ ! ~ ~ > > .... Vt f Q :; J. ':' )00 > ssw N ß Ii ë ~ * å ! ! ~ ~ n p Iii II! II II!;""" ¡ nn ¡ dill: I!IIPdllPPPP iil I/!!!'!" ¡gi '¡! ! ~ i ' · ¡ ¡ ¡ ! ' ! ~_ ~-!. ia ~ ~ ~§ ¡PH" '~ w_ß2sè~~ZZ'%' t: q. "",,¡"..'~ !S;aii~¡¡i!i! w.ei!!!~~*!.'~ ¡ ¡ ¡ . I ' , ; ¡ ¡ ¡ " " ~ ' Ii; ; I ~ ~ f ~ ~~ ~ ~ '~ I ~ ~ ! J ~;.~ ~ § ~ I ! ~ ~ ~ .' ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ! ¡ II ~d ¡!¡¡: . . ~ i ~ ~ . ~ ;-___ .J.. _ ë1 > JJ m > ~' > -C CD CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ....CD VI ;>..,¡ VI tn tn :'1 :'1 RUFf '5J..è1ol I ~ *~ I-' t\J .: . C7\ ..,¡ \J:) ~ ?" tn r ~ CITY OF W Department: P~IIIIIIfHì,vel~:RTH RICH /.AN D HILLS \ . Subject: ¡""-' I R.ec¡ueJ&t. of· Dr. Uexander Graham for Variance to s1àftoiè:ì!1iance tor 5409 Davi. Ioulevard. COuncil Meeting Date: 10/28/85 Agenda Number: so 85-14 l. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ¡ ! l~ i 1 : 1 ì ; i 1 , ~ , r ì T Dr. Alexander Grain the proce.s of renovating a residential structure on Lot 5, Block 33 Nor'east tton at 5409 Davis Boulevard into an off tee for his medical practice. This lot was re.ce.nt1y rezoned to allow for thls conversion. ì A request has b.en made to the Building Inspection Of (ice to allow the erection of a ground sip l1aquarefeet in size and 6 foot tall on thia lot. The permit was rejected based upon Sectic!m 4.2(f)òf the Stan Ordinance which specifies that a lot must have a . minimum 100 foot . frontaae in order to qualify for a groundaian. The subject lot is only 72 feet wide. The. applicant is requesting tbat the City c.ouucil/consider a variance to the Sign Ordinance to allow. the plàcing of a ground sign on the lot. RECOMMENÐA.TtON: i It is Staff's opinion that àpproval of this variance request. waul,,, set a precedent for several adjacent lots in the same area. ".,'~:: ':i:i'~':; .,~" .' 1"1 r <) -: Finance Review Acct, Number Sufficient Funds Available . Fin,nee Director P$ge 1 of 1 >..^..<' North Richland Hills Family Practice Clinic Association Alexander Grabam, M.D. A.A.F.P. ¥" S342A Davis Blvd. · Fort Worth. Texas 76118 · Phone 48S-3030 ....... o¥ _ ,~.: -......,...... 1985 ~blic Works Department North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ,',>! :: ~,; ,'¡ _:. .' i·j " ;;,,'{! "iT -:'.: " ¡. ¡ ,.- :<,'; , !,. :~, ' ,~¥ 1 The tssuewe wish to discuss pertains to Sign Ordinance #1001, Section 4.2 Ground Signs, Sub Section (F) which reads: '( A minimum qualified frontage of 100 feet shall be required to e~ect a ground sign. With this in mind we have listed these pertinent reasons that there should be an exception made in this code: 1. Since this lot was rezoned commercial from residential, a variance should be considered since the lot has ,only 72 feet of frontage. ' 2. This facility will serve .the community as a place for people to seek medical attention, therefore, it is crucial that ,ongoing traffic on Davis Blvd. c'an visibly tell that it is a . Doctor's office. - ,". Thank you for your cooperation on this urgent matter. Sincerely, yIft h.P, Alexand Graham, M.D. & Brian Mead Construction . - .."'~~'"-~~~....._\l'$It'~~_~,--",,,_~_. "-- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST PERMIT NUMBER ,,.,.... ... TYPE F f -: !"'j." "~r'"' c [', I' o SIGN l...,' I'''::, U ,I.... _.J ~;. (." r j NAME OF APPLICANT/BUSINESS t. ¡ r 'iF lJ C E t;,-- ADDRESS J:;4-C1 D4VI'S. P:.; ~\I(,\ LOCATION OF SIGN PT~-b~T SIGN LOCATION ON LOT c).ç:: q),~ ~.<:.> IJ G ·:rp;¡:::-RPr- k}{)\( fA I At?- -\-f) ~~ V 1.5- . ~G~H ~1'-\ YI1.Û S~~: ~HONE 4-8 ç - ~) 5 ,; (f..... ..... ""'.. ~ , DATE \..-.J - ¿. ¿. ~- r::~ NAME OF CONTRACTOR ADDRESS ~() I M t '.A, '0.: '!'-),; { t, '(!€ '01 WIDTH OF LOT FACING QUALIFYING STREET SIGN TAKING UP PARKING SPACE(S) YES .-1 . r : . ¡~ -of- --. ....." ,I /, .j' ~~. ...--..." -..,.... r --' PHONE..~ :' ". ,'f. -- BLOCKING FIRELANES YES NOX NOY ESTIMATED SIGN VALUE $ / () '"')/ì C (\ , L· '__" PERMANENT OR BILLBOARD FILING FEE $50.00 + ESTIMATED COST ~ITTEN CONSENT OF THE OIlNER OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURE OR LAND TO ¡¡¡¡ICH OR ON WHICH THE STRUCTURE IS TO BE ERECTED OR SIGN TO BE PAINTED. YES NO -- *************************************************************************** THE UNDERSIGNED AGREE TO CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE SIGN ORDINANCE #1001, 1-24-83, AND OTHER ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, AND ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITHS FO~ßR:'CTI\~ )'JS SIGN. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/~~, h '¿",_,Y-, APPROVED BY DATE SIGNED /() - 23 ,....~. ,t;> ç- APPROVED DATE PLEASE ATTACH ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO THE BACK OF THIS FORM. -~?/;r <tic ê~ M~ 'e.¡¿~1 "---- -- - - ! - _.~ - - ------ / V}/ i.» 2 -1~ I ~~ "'tl ~ j A -J ,::,. ~ \ n '--' I -~ __1 ~ ,tu ~ z :t ~ ~ ( I '~ ¡.... I /' ¡ ':\I ". N ./ \,; I ~ ,;- ... tV ~ S'3~ ': ~..i.~\'::;:H¿ Q~¿' ??o--:a. V,\ 'V, ~ -:t ~, Q '-~ ~~.... "'" '-D a . ~ l ~~~ - ~~ ~ ~": .J L1i '\I.. <i -J ri. þJ r- Z .q: .j I~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ -', ,. \ ~ i' ¡ fi I'!' I / /. I I ! I I ,i ~ j f , ì t . ~ 17// f / i -....¡ ., \ \ ~ ~ ~". ~ ':7 .",.. w Z ~ , ,.1 ..;.c.. ../, ~ ""... ;" < ~ J., - ~ in - ---_./ · "'-- ~ ".-"" · I · , f \ [ ...--\. I · : ,rýì il~,1 ',- , ¡ t " "\ i \.:: . J .r\ 1/ \ , I 'L-~ ,. , ¡ : I<:~ I ! \ I :' '-() 01 ~ ~ L V) ~ h.' '5.L I.1J -'''''......" V \,1' 0iV} -r: f./) [~ 03': ~ ~ r£. 0 ::) \...,' '~ .z ~ 0 ,..) 3= ::J - I -I '-. . U ~ 0 .J ~ ~ u-' ) ',~ ) \ .~ \ \.J ~ '",. ' (..J V) :::J:Q ~ "3 C£ -9 CD ! 0 () ¿: LU ':.. .! z: W ,j' c::¡:: - I <C ::!: i-- ~ <C L> I ··~l c:L. -< I ~ l£> a::: \ 0- ex:: w :J , /' . , 0 I -,-- I :z I I <C - I I >: I >< - I ill ~ .--1 -<:( ~ ~ ~ --. ¡ -I' I . 1- I ¡ I , ¡ I Ii II_ 1,_ ~! . ~ 1 J----! :--r,. i I L~ - r---; ,---, ! - ¡~ ~-J. ~ 1-- I-l. --.. -- , -; . I \; j - : -¡ -¡ I tJJ¡ ,-~~ '" "~.,." ¡ <-... '\~ "---.~ ..-:." ,~ , -. i ," j ~ ¡---~ '-~ ,--.-"'...... i Î _ '..--..~ ~---- I I , -......-.; . I ! .-.4 I -- u ,_ ~ i I I i 1 ·...ruW~~l ': I I! l . . ....... - '........ ,/. <C \/ -: I 'f l.....UI '§' 4. t5 .'--/ "* ..; ~ \.u <: J ~ \i E '2 1l 2 . ~ 0 t;-J m -0 ..- .\:; ..,.. - ¿. ~ ..3 - ~ ~ ?~-:\ < - <~< Pr- þ - ù:> ~ V \'> ~ ~---a ¥ ï 0 ~ I\. ~ N 0 ...) -0 Q cl él -::::t:" l.L :s '^ ( C\ ~ ~ I ~ \ 4..-- ¡ ài : ,~. "r , fÐ::: - - - - I , ~ ---::::..-- '. .' I - -~, ' I : '. II' I ,\, ' " I ( .,') '. ," \ ' ~___ " I} ... , - -:- -:- ::.' -= = = =-Ói 'h.; Ñ ,.' .,'-:...) I i --- : -~ : I ~\\ \ \\.~ \]\ \ \~i ·llllil~ \\\\\~((m I ::::1\ \ \ \: I . I ; ! i 1/ ! ¡ I ) ;"'" I I ' ! î '-' ./'. ¡ ! ....~ 11<1)-11 '-' - , :"i \ I ,. ,)'- {J \.;: --! <: ! Wi ill I I ¿ \ -"I 4: 2 . 11 -t 'VI rJ)¡ cJ. tQ >- l'J - ¿ ~ ~ ..... ;,.J .~ Cl ~ --t ~I wI ~! i . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 10/28/85 Agenda Number: GN 85-105 ~ubject: Lone Star Rate Increase. Ordinance No. 1302 This ordinance establishes the same rates adopted by the City of Fort Worth. These are the rates that were recommended by the rate analyst which was hired by Fort Worth with our approval. The ordinance cuts the Gas Company's request by some 60 to 70 percent. The City Attorney recommends adoption of this ordinance. Recommendation: ' Approve Ordinance No. 1302 I l l --I l -~ I 1 1 1 1 T T T '~' T N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds; Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other £f(~ , , ~¡t Department Head Signature . City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1302 . '- WHEREAS, on May 29, 1985 Lone Star Gas Company made application for an increase in Residential and Commercial Rates; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Staff have studied the rate package filed; and WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth has adopted its Ordinance No. 9491 on the 24th day of September, 1985 which sets rates in that city in answer to the same request made by Lone Star Gas Company. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The rates and terms adopted by the City of Fort Worth, Texas in Section 2 of Ordinance No. 9491 dated September 24, 1985 be, and here hereby, adopted for this city. 2. For the purpose of assuring rates to be charged by Lone Star Gas Company which are just and reasonable to the consumers of natural gas within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills as well as Company, - '- City reserves unto itself the right and privilege at any time to increase, decrease, alter, change or amend this ordinance or the rates herein established and provided for, or to enact any ordinance or adopt any such rates which would effectuate such purpose. In so doing, City further reserves unto itself the right and privilege of exercising any power granted it under statutory law, administrative rule or regulations, or otherwise. 3. By acceptance of this Ordinance, Lone Star Gas Company agrees that the rates set herein are sufficient to reover past losses resulting from its 1978 case styled Gas Utilities Docket No. GUD-1604 Consolidated presently pending before the Railroad Commission and will dismiss that case. 4. Lone Star Gas Company shall pay all reasonable rate case expenses to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas not to exceed $700.00. 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction and shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Ordinance No. 1302 Page 2 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect for billings after November 1, 1985. PASSED AND APPROVED this 28th day' of October, 1985. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: - '--- Attorney .' d. That the rates hereinafter fixed are determined to be fair, just and reasonable; and that all previously adopted rates and charges for gas service to residential customers in the City of Fort Worth should be and are hereby re- pealed effective November 1, 1985. SECTION 2. That for all gas consumed on and after November 1, 1985, and billed on and after November 1, 1985, all persons, firms, corpora- tion or associations of persons engaged in the business of furnish- ing, distributing or delivering natural gas to residential and commercial consumers in the City of Fort Worth are hereby authorized to charge for their product and service in accordance with the following sched ules: A. Residential & Commercial Rates The following rates are the maximum applicable to residential and commercial consumers per meter per month or for any part of a month for which gas service is available at the same locat ion. Summer rates shall be appl icable between the meter reading dates in May and October (five months). Winter rates shall be applicable at all other times. 1. Residential: Winter Summer Customer Charge All Consumption @ $6.00 $5.2846 Per Mcf $6.00 $4.9346 Per Mcf If the serv ice period is less than 28 days the customer charge is $.2143 times the number of days service. 2. Commercial: Winter Summer Customer Charg e All çonsumption @ $9.00 $ 5 . 2846 Per Mc f $9.00 $4.9346 Per Mcf If the service period is less than 28 days in the winter months, the winter customer charge is $.3214 times the number of days service. B. Gas Cost Adjustment Each monthly bill at the above rates shall be adjusted for gas cost as follows: 1. The City gate rate increase or decrease appl icable to current billing month residential and commercial sales shall be estimated to the nearest $0.0001 per Mcf based upon: a) A volume factor of 1.0294 determined in establishing the above rates for the distribution system as the rat io of adj usted purchased vol umes d iv ided by ad- justed sales volumes. -2- '~ b) The City gate rate estimated to be appl icable to vol wnes purchased during the current calendar month, expressed to the nearest $0.0001 per Mcf (shown below as · Re W ) . c) The base City gate rate of $4.0200 per Mcf. 2. Correction of the estimated adjustment determined by Item B 1. above shall be included as part of the adjust- ment for the second following billing month. The correct- ing factor (shown below as ·CW) shall be expressed to the nearest $0.0001 per Mcf based upon: a) The corrected adjustment amount based upon the actual City gate rate, less b) The estimated adjustment amount billed under Item B 1. above, divided by c) Distribution system residential and commercial sales Mcf recorded on the Company's books during the prior year for the month that the correction is included as part of the adjustment. 3. The adjustment determined by Item B 1. and Item B 2. above shall be multiplied by a tax factor of 1.06213 to include street and alley rental and state occupation tax due to increasing Company revenues under this gas cost adjustment provision. In summary, the gas cost adjustment (GCA) shall be d~termined to the nearest $0.0001 per Mcf by Item B 1., Item B 2., and Item B 3. as follows: GCA = (Item B 1. + Item B 2.) X Item B 3. GCA· (1.0294) (Re - $4.0200) + C) X 1.06213 C. Tax Adjustment The tax adjustment shall be an amount equivalent to the pro- portionate part of any new tax, or increased tax, or any other governmental imposition, rental, fee or charge (except state, coúnty, c.ity and special district ad valorem taxes and taxes on net fncome) levied, assessed or imposed subsequent to January 1, 1985, upon or allocable to the Company's distribu- tion operations, by any new or amended law, ordinance or contract. D. Special Provisions and Adjustments 1. Bills are due and payable when rendered and if not paid within 1S days of the date shown on the bill as the ·present meter readingW date or the wfor service throughW date, subjects the customer to immediate termination of gas serv ice unless they have made other payment arrange- ments with the Company. 2. Restorat ion of se rv ice is subj ect to the followi ng sche- dule of reconnect charges: In addition to the charges and rates set out above, the Company shall charge and collect the swn of: -3- Schedule Charge 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday Night, week-end and holiday $20.00 $30.00 as a reconnect charge for each reconnect ion or reinaugura- tion of gas service, where service has been discontinued at the same premises for any reason, with the following exceptions: a) For a builder who uses gas temporarily during con- struction or for display purposes. b) For the first occupant of the premises. c) Whenever gas service has been temporarily interrupted because of system outage, service work or appliance installation done by Company; or d) For any reason deemed necessary for company opera- tions. 3. A returned check handling charge of $7.50 will be made for each check returned to the Company for reasons of non- sufficient funds, account closed, payment withheld, in- valid signature or improper preparation. 4. A charge of $5.00 shall be made whenever it is necessary to send a company employee to a customers premises to collect amounts owed for gas service. SECTION 3. For the purpose of assuring rates to be charged by Lone Star Gas Company which are just and reasonable to the consumers of nat- ural gas within the corporate limits of the City of Fort Worth as well as Company, City reserves unto itself the right and privilege at any time to increase, decrease, alter, change or amend this - ordinance or the rates herein established and provided for, or to enact any ord inance or adopt any such rates which would ef feet uate such purpose. In so doing, City further reserves unto itsel f the right and privilege of exercising any power granted it under statu- tory law, administrative rule or regulations, or otherwise. SECTION 4. By acceptance of this Ord inance, Lone Star Gas Company ag rees that the rates set herein are sufficient to recover past losses re- suI ting from its 1978 case styled Gas Ut il it ies Docket No. GUD-1604 Consolidated presently pending before the Railroad Commission and will dismiss that case. -4- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works 10-28-85 Council Meeting Date: Subject: { l l l l l l J 1 1 Award of Bid on Flory Street Improvements to Walker Construction Agenda Number: PW 85-30 Walker Construction Company is the low bidder for this project by approximately $6,000. The bidding on this project has been held up for quite a long time for the purpose of obtaining more right of way for this project. Walker Construction Company's bid is approximately $17,000 below the engineer's estimate. Recommendation: The staff recommends to approve the bid of Walker Construction Company in the amount of $382,896.58. Funding Source: The CIP allocated the following budgets for the Flory Street improvements. Budget Actual Bid Street & Drainage $ 324,017.79 $ 265,321.58 Water Adjustments 40,000.00 58,717.00 Sewer Adjustments 40,000.00 58,858.00 Total $ 404,017.79 $ 382,896.58 Although the budgeted amounts for water and sewer adjustments is not sufficient, funds are available in the Unspecified Utility CIP account. It is recommended that funds be transferred from Unspecified Utility CIP to Flory Street Water & Sewer Adjustments in the amount of $37,575.00. l- 1 1 1 Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Rev & GO U9-00-27-6700 Acct. Number 13-00-?7-6150 Sufficient Funds Available 09-00-27-6750 1 -~ D.partm~Slgnature - ~ ,J¡-¡ · ~,íy MR:rt.f ~ , CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director T Page 1 of I -/ . KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas October 21, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-219, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FLORY STREET IMPROVEMENTS BID TABULATION In accordance with your instructions, bids were received on October 16, 1985, for the referenced project. This project includes paving, drainage, and utility constructi on on Flory Street between Grapev i ne Highway and Glenv i ew Dr ive. The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the tabulation indicates, bids were received from six ($) contractors. . 7 The low bid was received from WALKER CONSTRUCTION CO., 4028 Daley St., Fort Worth, Texas, 76118, (Joe Walker, 284-9208), in the amount of $382,896.58. The total construction time bid was 150 calendar days. The paving and drainage bid totals $265,321.58, water improvements totals $58,717, and sewer improvements totals $58,858. The engineer's estimate is about $400,000. The second low bid submitted was from Gibbins Construction CO.t 441 Haltom Road, Ft. Worth, Texas 76117, (834-4932) in the amount of $388,777.35 for a period of 190 calendar days. We have requested references and financial statements from the low bidder, Walker Construction Co. but have not received any documentation yet. Although we are not familiar with any paving and drainage type work performed by Walker Construction Co., we are not aware of any engineering considerations which would preclude contract award to this company. We will be available at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. Meanwhile, please do not hesitate to call. RI&:~ ~ RW AI r a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Li ne, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gene Ri ddl e, Di rector of Pub 1 i c Works """"'- ¡)"HIS COiPY FOR Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of ~lC Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267-3367