The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1984-07-09 Agendas I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 9, 1984 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Discussion of Resolution Regarding Membership in CONET and Appointment of Representative and Alternate - Mayor Echols (Agenda Item #11) 2. Discussion of Budget Workshòp,Schedule- Mayor Pro Tem Davis 3. Discussion of Joint Meeting With City Council and Planning and Zening Commission On Master Plan - Ge.rge Tucker 4. Discussion of Purchasing Right-of-Way Dennis Horvath (Agenda Items #17 & 18) 5. Discussion of ClP Projects in Relation to Chapman Road (Memo from Dennis Horvath to Rodger Line, July 5, 1984) (Agenda Item #19) 6. Discussion of Goals and Obectives of Park and Recreation Department - Dave Petika -~ .L fj, ,L · ¡ L-I ~.~ ~ I ì I I- I I I I I I I Ie I I I I II I I I- I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 9, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ··1. Call to Order ITEM ACTION TAKEN ~ ~. Roll Call ~r ~./ Invocation Consideration of Meetin June 25 1984 ~ Consideration of Removina Item (s) from the Consent Aaenda -' ~ Consideration of Consent A2enda Item (s) .,. indicated bv Asterisk (12. 13. 14. 15. 17. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-41. ReQuest of J.V. Frank Trustee to Rezone Lots 8A thru 17B. Block 33. Holidav West Addition from R-4~SD (Separate OwnershiD Duolex) to C-l (Commercial) (Located on the south side of Buenos Aires Drive and aporoximately 220 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-41 I I f I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY ~ AGENDA JULY 9, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Cham.ere, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBE~ 11 .t, I I I I ITEM PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-51. Reauest of Loren Pelton to Rezone a Portion of Tract 14B. W. W. Wallace Survey. Abstract 1606, from C-1 (Commercial) to R-5-D (Duolex) (Located on south side of Harwood Road. bounded on the south bv Graoevine Hiahwav, and aooroximatelv 304 feet east of Colorado Boulevard) ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-51 Consideration Membershio in CONET and Aooointina Reoresentative and Alternate ~~.. Consideration of Ordinance Amendina Ordinance No. 316 - Park and Recreation Board *~; Consideration of Ordinance Amendina Ordinance No. 324 - Library Board ~. Consideration of Ordinance Amendin2 Ordinance No. 797 - Cable TV ~Consideration of Resolution Establishina Policy on Purchase of Easements for Draina2e Imorovements ""')"Y. -, oêI;,..~:. ;-. ,"-' P"" '. '!!~"'<, ~;.,~.~,;, ;;"'·~".:-~~~i~~;A. 1!-"--,: '.7"~:';;a~~r.-: .::'#ó',. :..,-:. \t", '. . .....- u~:,~.,;·.' ~ ",~";,-{'~';--.,:,,":'~, ....;.;o.-'.It:~..., ,,~.'-! ....... ,,_,".b'~..(" ~-.(- ,~. I I- I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I {t I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 9, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER 16. ITEM Consideration of Ordinance Pertainina to the KeeDina of Bees ACTION TAKEN W:"" Consideration of Purchasin~ Ri2ht-of-Wav on Glenview Drive *~- Consideration of Purchasina Riaht-of-Wav on Florv Street Consideration of Cha man Draina *~/~ Consideration of Bids for Century Oaks Addition Water Lines ........"--- ~ Citizens Presentation 22. Ad10urnment ....\.:.. 'I- __--..¡;,ati..·'~_ ____"" ;r.:'~.;.~,.-~ . ",.." ',j ,",. I '4f/II I RIGHT-OF-WAY DATA - FLORY STREET I- ( $ 2 . 0O) ( . 2O) Purchase Temp. Con st. Estimated I Parcel Current Owner Sq. Ft. Price Ea semen t Assessment 2 Walker Construction Co. 500 $1,000 $1,798.00 I 2 TE Walker Construction Co. 500 $ 100 1 Bassiony Rhirna 1,093 2,190 3,813.97 1 TE Bassiony Rhima 1,093 220 I 3 TE Allison & Henry Contractors 1,498 300 11,013.00 I 7 Walker Construction Co. 328 655 7 TE Walker Construction Co. 328 65 I 8 Walker Construction Co. 328 655 8 TE Walker Construction Co. 328 65 9 Walker Construction Co. 345 690 I 9 TE Walker Construction Co. 345 70 10 TE Houseman Financial Corp. 1,000 200 2,972.00 1.11 W.F. Waites 1,000 2,000 2,220.00 TE W.F. Waites 1,000 200 I 12 TE Henry D. /Co1len 1'1. Besson 760 150 1,101.92 13 Mary Jo Gaston 1,000 2,000 I 13 TE ~..ary Jo Gaston 2,000 400 14 Mary Jo Gaston 1,000 2,000 I 14 A Mary Jo Gaston 1,575 3,150 14 TE Mary Jo Gaston 950 190 I 15 B & B Pest Con tro1 500 1,000 1,798.00 15 TE B & B Pest Con tro1 500 100 16 William E. French 500 1,000 5,616.63 I 16 TE William E. French 500 100 17 James C. Craine et ux 350 700 1,258.60 I 17 TE James C. Craine et ux 350 70 18 J. Craine 650 1,300 976.30 18 TE J. Craine 650 130 I 19 Mary Glady s Snow et vir 984 1,970 2,872.44 .TE Mary Gladys Snow et vir 950 190 I 21 Walker Construction Co. 2,524 5,050 21 TE Walker Construction Co. 5,149 1,010 I I -4 ¡. . . Page Two I I- ($2.00) ( . 20) Purchase Temp. Const. Estimated Parcel Current Owner Sq. Ft. Price Easement Assessment 122 TE B. J. Fanning 1,100 220 1,255.42 23 B. J. Fanning 395 790 463.10 123 TE B. J. Fanning 790 160 24 Ronnie D. Hutchens et ux 400 800 998.40 124 TE Ronnie D. Hutchens et ux 800 160 25 Lloyd Tabor 400 800 1,188.80 25 TE Lloyd Tabor 800 160 126 TE Joe V. Henry 950 190 713.45 127 27 A-I Approver Pool Sere Co. 500 1,000 1,798.00 TE A-I Approver Pool Sere Co. 700 140 128 TE Lowell B. Allison Con st. Inc. 1,071 215 5,616.63 29 Bertha Geneva Hansen 500 1,000 1,798.00 29 TE Bertha Geneva Hansen 500 100 I~~ Anglin Estate 500 1,000 Anglin Estate 500 100 131 TE Gene Stinunel et al 1,625 325 132 32 William T. Marcom, Jr. 500 1,000 1,110.00 TE William T. Marcom, Jr. 1,375 275 33 H. F. Perkins et ux 250 500 899.00 133 TE H. F. Perkins et ux 50 34 Larry C. Young 1,250 2,500 134 TE Larry C. Young 1,250 250 I Total Right-Of-Way Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Estimated Assessment from Property Owners Selling Right-Of-Way I Total Estimated Assessment for Entire Flory Project . . . . . . $43,590.00 51,281.66 90,057.88 I I- I I I I- I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I- I Oscar E. Reeder Biographical Data - May 20, 1983 Personal Married - Wife, Lena Mae - 6 children Born in Palmetto, Florida Graduate of University of Florida - BSBA Degree Resident of Texas since 1946 Active Military Service, World War II, 5 years Lt. Col. in Retired Army Reserve Certified Public Accountant in Texas since 1948 Employment Partner - Main Hurdman Co-Partner in charge of Fort Worth office Church Affiliation Member of Richland Hills Methodist Church Former Treasurer and Member of Board Organizations and Activities Professional Immediate past Chairman and Member of Texas State Board of Publ~c Accountancy Member and former Vice President of the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants Member and former President of the Fort Worth Chapter, TSCPA Member of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants I \0 ~.., ~ '~f-' ~ 0 t1 0 ~ OH ~r1' <:::J ..tj (") (") ~ ~oo I ~ m ~ 0 ~ ::c:X 0 m c:::. ~~ ~ -u> ~CJ Ie p.. 000 '- Z ~ t-3~ txj t1 ~ ~ ~t::1 N H C:::.. 0.. N t-3Z Z ~ '- txjCJ txj '-< '" ~. en \0 I--' 00 00 * \0 I -.....J U1 I--' \0 00 .t:'-- I I I--' t'Ut-3 txj::c V1 t1 0 c::. 0 t-£. r1' t"'4:X I (") ~ txj. (") m ~ 00 ~ oo::c I--' '- c:: m -u> ~ ~ ~ ~~ CJ 0.. H t-3 I ~ ~ ~ ttj t1 W ~Z ~ N 00 0.. ~ 0 :> ~ U1 ~ CJS '-< '" en U1 Zttj I OZOO \0 ~ t-3 ~ t-3 I--' t-3 c::: :> ::t: ~ H to ì-<t-3C::: ~ :>t"'4 Ie HO ~:> CJ:> .-< t-3 ::C~ H t"'4 00 00 0 > ttjz z:> ~ t; t::1 ttj 0 I '-J t"dt-3 ~~ t::1~1-%j 0 t1 0 00 ::t:H t-£. r1' ~~ Ht-3Hto (") (") ~ t"'4 H ~ H ~ m ~ t"'4 0 t; ~ ~ OOZ ~ 00 m oc:: '- 0 I ~ -u> ~t-3 <: 0.. ~~ t-3 txj ~ ttj :x t1 '- H ~ ttj ~ t-3 Z 0.. e t-3.-< 00 t-3 I ~ ~ ttj 00 ~ \0 ~ en e ~ 00 . N U1 I I 00 t"dt-3 1-%jt"'4 0 t1 0 o· t-£. r1' ~ (") (") PJ t-3t; ~ m ~ ~ ~ m on I ~ -(J'} :;:00 0.. t-3Z ~ ::c> t1 ~ ~ t-3 .t:'-- CJ) 0.. .t:'-- t-3txj txj ~t%j I PJ ~ txj:;:O c:: Zt"'4 ~ ~ ~ t"'4 GJt"'4 en \0 t%j HH 0 . 00 00 zo . CJ) t%jt-3 Ie e t%jt-3 e :::0 t-3oo~ txj " ~t-d::c t"'4C:: CJ)~£ Ztxj I t%jc/) :::0'- c/) H Z CJ . I ex> t-d~ "' ~~ 0 t1 0 ~ 0 H ~. rt .. t:::' n n Ø) · 0 00 I Ø) (t) ~ 0 t---' t-tj'-4 0 (t) O· E(~ ~ -(J) :::ot-t Ie 0- H· w Z Ø) t%1 t1 ~ ~~ '-tt:1 \J1 Ot%1 C:::.. 0- +:-- :::0:::0 Z Ø) w H~ t%1 '< w ~~ en t---' t---' \J1 \0 I Hw '-J t%1 \J1 ~8 ~ \0 OOZ ex> 00 +:-- ~ I . I (X) t-dH H~ 0 t1 0 ~t%1 ~. rt <:ø I n n Ø) HH Ø) (t) ~ ZO ~ ØZ ~ (t) w > (') ~ -(J) t-t H H 0- H ~ t%1 Ø) t%10 ~ I t1 ~ ~~ +:-- 0 ~ 0- N OOt-t ~ Ø) w H CJt:::' '< \J1 H Z t%1 en ~ H 0 Zoo I (J'\ trj :::0 H> ~ . 00 t-3 c::Z> N ::c ~ H td \J1 (') to< H c::: 0 ~ >t-t . H 0:::0 > CJ ~ to< 1-3 Ie ::c H t-t 00 00 0 ~ t%1Z t:::' ~ ~ 0 t:::' ~ ~ ::CH I N t"'dH ~~ H I-3H td N t1 0 >t%1 t-tH~H 0 ~. rt 1-30 t-t 0 t:1 n Ø) >z 00 z ~ 00 n (t) ~ c:::> ~ Ø) ø~ ~ >t:1 1-3 ~ I (t) -(J) w t%1 ~ t-3~ ~ trj 0- Z Ø) ~ t%1N 00 t-3 ti +:-- ~~ 00 (j'\ I 0- \Ø OO\Ø Ø) co '< ~ H en 0 Z (') '-J \J1 I I '-J t-dt-3 ê~ 0 ti 0 ~. rt t-tCJ n n ~ t%1~ Ø) (t) ~ ootrj t---' 00 to< (t) I ~ -(J) > 0- Ht-t Ø) t%1~ t1 ~ ~~ t'1j t%jtrj 00 c:: Zt""4 0. 0 OOw t-t GJt"'4 I Ø) w trj HH '< (X) H 00 ZO en (X) Z 00 t'1jH (J'\ CJ trjH . þd Ie (J'\ t-3 Cl)Q"\ lI'1 t'1j .......-. ~ t-d::I: t"'4C::: CI) ~~ H CI) Zw I GJ H Z CJ . I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I - ~7þe~ fJ City of Xórth Richland HiUs, Texas July 5, 1984 Ref: ACMM 54-84 Memo to: Rodger N. Line City Manager From: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Subject: Allocation of Unspecified Street and Drainage Funds We currently have $2,008,135 in unspecified street and drainage projects in the Capital Improvement Program. It i8 my understanding that the following projects were deleted from the CIP by formal Council action on February 27, 1984: Hewitt Street Drainage Morgan Meadows Mickey and Center Big Fossil $547,033 803,919 164.836 175.357 $1,691.145 (DC, QeÐ · O/tŸ\ "2 ~ tA/' J.Þ' - ~ ~ OÔÛ v- if 1 (J The Morgan Meadows project is now being reconsidered and Richard Albin is in the process of estimating the cost of the realigned channel. Richard is also estimating the cost of reconstructing Mickey within the existing right-of-way. The estimated cost to the City for the Chapman Drive Project is $753,611. We need clarification from the Council on the status of projects formally deleted. It now appears that we have sufficient bond money available for the Morgan Meadows and Chapman projects, however if the Hewitt drainage project, Mickey and Big Fossil projects are reconsidered we will hot have sufficient funds to cover all of these projects. 9~ DR/ gp (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I ~ø DATE: July 9,' 1984 SUBJECT: Goals of Park/Recreation Department DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The Council expressed a desire for Dave Petika, Director of Parks and Recreation to outline his goals and objectives at the budget work session. Due to the anticipated full agenda at the work session, Dave will have the opportunity to outline his program at the Pre-Council session. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: N/A BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I -- I .' 'r' " .~.. : ,__ . .,.'; ··;~~':(,:..··.::f.\~..¡f.i".".".. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JUNE 25, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order June 25, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Jim Kenna Virginia Moody Harold Newman Jim Ramsey Present: Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Moore Rex McEntire Gene Riddle Richard Albin Lou Spiegel Marjorie Nash Press: Mark England David Doremus Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary City Attorney Director Public Works/Utilities City Engineer Finance Director Planning & Zoning Comm. Mid Cities Daily News Northeast Chronicle 3. The invocation was given by Councilwoman Hinkle. 4. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the June 11, 1984 meeting. Councilwoman Moody s~ated thåt on page 4, item 113, the name was Bartclay. Mayor Echols stated that on Page 8, 4th paragraph, the word "stated" should be "started". Motion carried 6-0; Councilman Fisher abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. Mayor Echols stated he had a request to speak on Item 113, therefore he would remove item 113 from the Consent Agenda. CALL TO ORDER ROLL C~L INVOCATION r-- CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 11, 1984 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEM (8) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA ':\.'·~~~~W~~__"~~;t~~..t~1jd,,~Þfj\~~t~Â~~·,~6Ä~~_-:;;~~'.~'i~.7'.::.~.~:":~,..'- .'~/.~.t-~-k"~\..~"~:~';C'J.::~~::·."k~~~~.~~.-1ìt~1'~-'"..~::,:;:.r:';¡~'!'!~,J:~~'~~':'."""~~~~;¡,:"~":':"" I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 6. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. *7. *8. 8a. Mayor Echols advised the Council that Item 8a had been added to the agenda. Mr. Line stated it was not brought to his attention until today that this item was supposed to be on the agenda. Mr. Line"stated that according to the minutes of the May 14th meeting action on the request was postponed until the June 25th meeting. Mr. McEntire advised the Council that this item should be taken up in executive session. Mayor Echols advised that the Council would retire to executive session to discuss this item, after the Citizen presentation. June 25, 1984 Page 2 CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (7, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, & 29) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-65, REQUEST OF JOHN COOK TO ABANDON FINAL PLAT OF SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION, 5th FILING (LOCATED EAST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY EXISTING SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION AND ON THE SOUTH BY LA CASITA MOBILE HOME PARK) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-113, REQUEST OF JOHN COOK TO ABANDON FINAL PLAT OF SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION, 4TH FILING (LOCATED ON THE EAST S IDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD, BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY NEWMAN DRIVE AND LA CASITA MOBILE HOME PARK ON THE SOUTH) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING PS 84-27, REQUEST OF AUBREY BROTHERS FOR FINAL PLAT OF FLAMINGO ESTATES, SECTION 2 (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FLAMINGO ESTATES, SECTION I AND I APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ED EN ROAD AND RUMFIELD ROAD APPROVED I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .... . ,'- ,.~t¡~'?:;~.;~.:· ;'-.'L.c:. ,: ~.." ..;. -:.; " . '. :;.;.. '~::1~' '.,\' "'.,~' :'.~ .'^ rc j'~~{'-" ~.;~ -;':~'.~_~_~ ;~... ~~Ä~;·.4f~f'lP ~'.-:,o';' :~~:~~~:--ia_'\'~·((~~W::-,,'l~. "1. ~.::.~ ~ ."..... ...~~;'t-,,_ 9. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There was no one present to speak. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the the public hearing. . 10. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to PZ 84-35, Ordinance No. 1128. Councilman Fisher asked if the problem of obstructing traffic on Bob Drive had been looked into. Mr. Line stated he would certainly look into it. Councilman Kenna stated that to change from R-7 MF to R-6-T, seemed to him that the city and everyone else got a good deal when zoning in this direction. Councilman Kenna stated that these were all 1,100 square feet, according to the agenda. ~ouncilman Kenna stated that he thought any time there was a chance to move' in this direction it was a good deal. Motion carried 7-0. 11. Mayor Echols stated the background on this request was that they wanted to have two pole signs at the location of Oyster's Restaurant, 8026 Bedford Euless Road. Mayor Echols stated there was one pole sign already in place in the rear of the location. . Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to deny this request. Mr. Steve Waldrum, Irving, representing Waldrum Sign Company, appeared before the Council. Mr. Waldrum stated the reason they wanted the additional sign was for entrance awareness. Mr. Waldrum stated it would also increase safety to the entrance and also would give more light so the people would be more aware of the entrance. Mr. Waldrum stated Oyster's was suffering a hardship because of a need for this signage based on being able to compete with other restaurants on the same street, which already had an entrance sign. . June 25, 1984 Page 3 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-35, REQUEST OF HARWOOD HILLS PARTNERSHIP TO REZONE THE SOUTH PORTION OF BLOCK 4, NORTHRIDGE ADDITION FROM R-7-MF (MULTI-FAMILY) TO R-6-T (TOWNHOUSES) (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HARWOOD ROAD AND BOB DRIVE) (POSTPONED AT THE MAY 14, 1984 COUNCIL MEETING) APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-35 ORDINANCE NO. 1128 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF OYSTER'S RESTAURANT FOR A VARIANCE TO THE SIGN DENIED I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I "'..··.·;.~~4C~f::~~....~,~·.~~~~~..F.·.,:· ::......:..,,;..;,~,~.¡.1.:.~>:: '>:';"."-. ,~~J:""':'~~~"'~"-J(;~~~.~'''''''''''~~.''''",:~,.¥':·~.~'!''"~-'-:¡'A;~'1~~;.#:~~.".,.... ,,'f: Mr. Dan Burben, 7617 Valverde, Fort Worth, Te~as, appeared before the Council. Mr. Burben stated the only information needed to give the Council other than what Mr. Waldrum had given was that the building be set back a little bit further than the other restaurants on the street, so when driving by it was not noticeable. Oyster's sets between Daniels and Dos Gringos. Mr. Burben stated that on occasions people came into Oyster's thinking they were at Dos Gringos. Councilman Ramsey stated that the City did have a Sign Ordinance and the Cóuncil had been very protective of the Ordinance and had not given out too many variances. Councilman Ramsey stated that according to the Staff there were several restaurants standing in the wings wanting to ask for sign variances. Councilman Ramsey stated he would have to vote against the variance, but at the same time, Councilman Kenna was working on reWTiting the ordinance and he would request that this be one of the items taken into consideration in the new study. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that regarding the other establish- ments that had two signs, there was a time schedule in the present Sign Ordinance under non-conformance and they would have to remove one of them at some date. Motion carried 6-1; Councilmen Fisher, Ramsey, Kenna and Newman and Councilwoman Moody and Mayor Pro Tem Davis voting for; Councilwoman Hinkle voting against. 12. Mr. McEntire stated he recommended the Cou~cil take no action this item. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, that no action be taken on this item. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the letter from Lone Star Gas stated that whether the Council took action or not, they were going to do it anyway. Mr. McEntire stated..yes. Motion carried 7-0. 13. Mr. Ratts, 4921 Wedgeview Drive, appeared before the Council Mr. Ratts stated he just wanted to know what the North Texas Commission was. June 25, 1984 Page 4 CONSIDERATION OF LONE STAR GAS COMPANY'S REQUEST FOR INCREASED CHARGES FOR MAIN EXTENSIONS (POSTPONED AT THE June II, 1984 MEETING) NO ACTION TAKEN CONSIDERATION OF RENEWING CONTRACT WITH NORTH TEXAS COMMISSION APPROVED ~~~~~~ ~,~~~~~~~~~~.~.~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~Ä~~~~~~~~~q,,' " I I Ie I I I I I *14. I Ie I *15. I *16. I II I *17. I I Ie I Mr. Line stated that the North Texas Commission was an agency that was created in about 1971, with the idea the DFW Regional Airport was to be opened about that time and there would be a very vigorous, area wide, far reaching program put in place to promote the benefits of the airport to capitalize as much as possible on the economic stimulus to the economy of the entire North Texas area. Mr. Line stated that in his opinion the North Texas Commission had been instrumental in bringing the Dallas/Fort Worth area and its airport to the attention of economic decision makers on a National basis they certainly could not be given all the credit, but a lot of the credit for the very strong economy that the area had enjoyed over the last ten or twelve years. Mr. Line stated that in his opinion it was very appropriate that the City ,of North Richland Hills participate in the effort to continue a strong economy. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the contract with the North Texas Commission. June 25; 1984 Page 5 CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE NO. 310 REGARDING ELECTRICAL CODE ORDINANCE NO. 1036 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR MACKEY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE V APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #9, IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,148.60 TO M. A. VINSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - WALKER BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED CONS'IDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE 110, IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,260.91 - RUFE SNOW DRIVE PHASE II APPROVED '~';~.¢'\'~~¡¡'~~~~':~':{:~~~~';:¡;~-.'<...~,. <"'~·~:::·~'~_::)~~~'_;"'~-;;'~"'..~~-W>t:.~:'iI':'¡I"::;:;"~,.:3'~~~,'¡..J..~~.~_.¡ ,;>:....';7.9-.,.; I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 18. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to grant the appeal hearing to be heard August 13, 1984. Motion carried -7-0. 19. Mr. Jim Ratts, 4921 Wedgeview, appeared before the Council Mr. Ratts asked if the bonds had already been voted on. Mayor Echols stated that these were revenue bonds which were refunded through the process of the water and sewer revenues. That was'where the term revenue came from. Mayor Echols stated the bonds were sold in view of the revenue that would be produced from those items. Mayor Echols stated that these were not general obligation bonds. .Mayor Echols stated that these bonds were for the construction of a sewer outfall line, which would satisfy a portion of the City's obligation in regard to the Watauga sewer system. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Resolution No. 84-18. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Echols recognized Mr. John NaIl, representative for Flamingo Estates, and advised him that item would be taken up in executive session. Mr. John NaIl appeared before the Council and advised that he would be happy to answer any questions. Mr. McEntire asked Mr. NaIl if his client was willing to execute a letter of indemnity. Mr. NaIl replied yes. Mayor Echols asked 1f there was any guarantee that could be put on this where it could be enforced over a period of time. Mr.McEntire stated it would be a general indemnity and was good for ever. 20. Mr. R. R. Childs, 412 Crosstfmber, Hurst, appeared before Council Mr. Childs stated he had a rent house at 4208 Keeter, North Richland Hills, and had a drainage problem because a neighbor had put up a fence with concrete under it. Mr. Childs stated the people that rented his house were afraid to leave when a cloud came up because it might flood. Mr. Childs stated it was his understanding that the fence was installed without a permit. Mr. Childs stated he would like to know if there was something the city could do about the situation. Mr. Childs stated the City Inspector had come out and the man would not talk to him. June 25, 1984 Page 6 CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING AN APPEAL HEARING TO JONCO DEVELOPMENT - PZ 84-45 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE OF INTENT TO PROCEED WITH THE SALE OF $2,000,000 IN WATER AND SEWER BONDS RESOLUTION NO. 84-15 APPROVED CITIZEN PRESENTATIONS 1) R.R. CHILDS 412 CROSSTIMBER DRIVE HURST J TEXAS RE: DRAINAGE PROBLEM AT 4208 KEETER 2) JOHN HITES 7405 FORREST LANE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS RE: KEEPING OF PIGEONS NOT PRESENT &~~;io.~f:'~~~,~~{·~¡..~_~~..~"-4~".':.~';""¿'~þ'·"t~~...,:..~'(-~<,,;~~~~'~;.,:1;''''''''''~' .'" .:....~J.!_.~.".,...4-·..".:v .i.,':.>:.·.,:.",.i.;~.. ...~~;,. . .....~~". ~"";';~\~"~"'f'.' , I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mayor Echols asked Mr. Childs if he had considered filing a complaint other than asking the inspector to come out. Mr. Childs stated he had talked to an attorney about it, but had rather not go to court. Mayor Echols stated he would have the City Staff investigate the situation further. Mr. Line stated he had discussed this with Mr. Childs earlier and would be glad to' investigate it, if Council so directs, but needed some specifics as to what is supposed to be investigated. Mr. Line stated as he understood the situation it was a problem betw~en two privately owned pieces of property where one had erected a fence which Mr. Childs felt was causing problems for his property. Mr. Line stated that even though the fence may not have been permitted when it was erected, he did not think the courts would allow the City to tear the fence down. Mr. Childs asked if there was not a law that you could not interfere with the natural flow of water. Mr. McEntire stated the City did not enforce that law, the courts did. Mr. Childs stated he did not want the fence torn down, only a hole in the cement so the water could go through. Mr. Childs stated the man had fenced off an easement in the back. Could he lower his yard and let the water run out the easement? Mayor Echols stated he could if it did not incur liability against someone else. Councilman Kenna asked who the easement belonged to. Mr. Childs stated it was a utility easement. Mr. Riddle stated he had looked at this problem about two years ago. One of tþe problems was the house itself. Mr. Riddle stated the house was built almost flat on the gro~nd and then came up to the back of it. Mr. Riddle stated he had talked with Mr. Childs at that time and Mr. Childs had mentioned cutting the easement down and he advised him he should make sure he did not damage the apartments behind him. Mr. Riddle stated there were several problems there. He had also looked at the fence. Whether there was a permit or not he could not determine, but the fence was weathered and old and not erected at that time. Mr. Riddle stated that Mr. Childs' house was built low and water would tend to get in it even if it did not come from someone elses property. June 25, 1984 Page 7 3) RAY HALL 8108 TIMBERHILL CT. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS RE: KEEPING OF PIGEONS NOT PRESENT I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I L~.,;e¥~···~, ;"':"~""" #~~.--'t.:~:">:w.. .~<$.~:.I~.~~~~~.~\o.I',,:~..,~~~;~~'o.'!Ì.':!~"~"~~~'A:-".~~,,~ ...,......--~..<'.:....'1"', .;::>,..... '. Mayor Echols asked Mr. Childs if he could drain the water off with out harming someone elses property. Mr. Childs stated there was one house below him and he was not sure if the water would bother him or not. Mayor Echols stated he felt Mr. Childs should exercise his judgement on whether or not he could solve the problem without harming someone else. 2) John Hites - not present 3) Ray Hall - not present Mr. John Townsend, 5021 Nancy Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Townsend stated he had received his tax notice and he was speaking for himself and other people on fixed income. Mr. Townsend stated he thought his tax rate with the City was frozen, but according to the form he received there was a 65% increase for next year. Mr. Townsend asked the Council if they had thought about any kind of relief for people like himself. Mayor Echols advised Mr. Townsend that the tax rate for next year had not been set. Mayor Echols stated the statement that Mr. Townsend had received was merely a projection of what it would be if the tax rate stayed the same as it was and it would not be able to do that because of the requirements of State Law, which would require that thè tax rate be adjusted to where it could be no more than 3% above the previous year unless there was an election. Mayor Echols stated the figures that Mr. Townsend was looking at was not accurate as far as what his tax would be next year. Mr. Townsend stated that in that case his taxes could be more. Mayor Echols stated no, it c~uld be no more than 3% over last year without an election to"'permit it. Mr. Line stated that he understood that what Tarrant Appraisal did was that they computed the rate for the City of North Richland Hills that would produce the same amount of income from taxes exclusive of new construction and base their calculation on what the tax bill would be on that so called calculated rate. Mr. Line stated their calculated rate alreády presumed a reduction in the tax rate. Mr. Line stated the 1983 tax rate was $0.50. The notices that were going out presumed a rate of about $0.39, so there was already slightly more than a 10% to 20% reduction. June 25', 1984 Page 8 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. Townsend stated his taxes went from $75.00 to $116.00 so that was a 65% increase in his tax. Mayor Echols asked what the percentage of increase was on his property. Mr. Townsend stated from $28.000 to $42.000. Mayor Echols stated the Council would take this into consideration when the tax rate was set to try to do the best they could. Mr. Roy Burks, 68~1 Corona, appeared before the Council. Mr. Burks stated he was here tonight representing his neighbors on a zoning problem on Corona. Mr. Burks stated the neighborhood was made up of $75,000 to $150,000 homes located behind the church. Mr. Burks stated the church purchased one of the homes adjacent to their own property and the property owners were told the church needed the house for living quarters for their janitor and for storage for donated goods. Mr. Burks stated they were supposed to keep the yard up and maintain the house for residential use. Mr. Burks stated that two weeks ago desks and office equipment were moved into the house and they were told the church intended to use the house for an office. Mr. Burks stated that the 1984 official Zoning Map showed that 6809 Corona was zoned R-2-Residential, which prohibited the use as office space. Mr. Burks stated the Chief Zoning Clerk of the City was notified of the problem two weeks ago and no action was taken until three other complaints were made. Mr. Burks stated he W4S advised the church had been contacted and intended to request a variance from the Zoning Board of Adjustments and could continue to use the house in violation of the Zoning Ordinance until a hearing was scheduled. Mr. Burks stated that all of the church property, including this house, was put up for sale, presumably to the highest bidder. There- fore, those who were present tonight would like to be on record as opposing any action by the City that would allow office space in their neighborhood. Mr. Burks stated they would like to also object tó·the slow reaction on the part of the City. The unconcerned attitude of the City Staff and the apparent reluctancy of the City to put a stop to an obvious violation of the Zoning Ordinance. Mayor Echols stated that he assumed that if further complaints were made something would be done. citations issued or whatever was necessary. Mr. Line stated that normally when someone had made the request for a variance. the Staff did not issue citations to anyone until the request was heard. June 25'. 1984 Page 9 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. Burks asked if they could continue to run the office. Mr. McEntire stated that if there was a case pending before the Board of Adjustment, normally citations were not issued and the case should be heard within about 30 days. Mr. Burks asked if the property owners would be notified when the case was to be heard. Mayor Echols stated they would be notified and the Staff would check and see if such a case had been filed. Councilman Ramsey stated he disagreed that the case should go to the_Zoning Board of Adjustments. He felt if the house was being used as an office it was not in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and should go to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Councilman Ramsey stated that someone needed to check into it and if the decision was made that it should go to Planning and Zoning, then someone needed to issue a citation. Mr. Line stated that if the church was not taking action to get it resolved, then the Staff would proceed. Councilwoman Moody stated she had some calls on this problem and called and talked with one of the Inspectors. Councilwoma~ Moody stated the Inspector advised her that a meeting was to be set up with Mr. Riddle and the representative of the church to try and resolve the problem. Mr. Riddle stated he had talked with the minister on Thursday and he wanted to set up a meeting but he left town. Mr. Riddle statèd he would be leaving town by the time the minister returned. Mr. Riddle stated the minister was suppose to have a meeting with the neighbors. Councilwoman Moody asked if it would be two weeks before a meeting could be set. Mr. Riddle stated the church could file a zoning case anytime. Councilwoman Moody asked if they could continue to operate out of the house until they filed for rezoning. Mr. Riddle stated that the City normally lets a person have that much time until they went through a zoning process. Mr. Riddle stated that as far as he knew they had not filed an application with the Board of Adjustments. Mr. Line stated the City would not let it drag out two weeks. If the church was unable to resolve the problem and not take action to get the zoning changed, then the City would act and use whatever authority the City had. June 25, 1984 Page 10 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I 8a. Ie I Mr. Burks asked if the longer the church used the property for an office, did it damage the homeowners case. Mr. McEntire asked how long the church had been using the house for an office. Mr. Burks stated about two weeks. Mr. Burks stated that the neighbors had met with representatives of the church several times before the office was moved in and they assured them it would be used for residential purposes. Mr. Line asked Mr. Burks if they had met with them since the office had been moved in. Mr. Burks stated they had tried to but had no luck. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that even though the Council could not take action the Council did support this fact; the Council was not in favor of someone running an office in a residential area. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated that he agreed with Councilman Ramsey that this was not a case for the Board of Adjustment, it was changing the use of the land. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt there was grounds for issuing a citation, but they would have the right to go before the Planning Zoning Commission for a public hearing and everyone within 200 feet would be notified of meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the Planning and Zoning Commission would make their recommendations to the Council. There would be two public hearings that the property owners would be notified of. Mr. Burks asked how long it would be before action was taken, how long did the church have to file. Councilwoman Moody stated that Mr. Line had said if the church did not take action soon, then the City would be forced to take action. Mr. Line stated that if the church had not taken action by the end of the week the City would proceed to force the issue. Mayor Echols adjourned to executive session. Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order. The same Council Members and Staff were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PS 84-27 subject to an indemnity agreement being received by the City and approved by the City Attorney and City Staff. June 25, 1984 Page 11 EXECUTIVE SESSION BACK TO ORDER I " I Ie I I I I I I Ie I !I I I I I I Ie I Motion carried 6-1; Councilman Ramsey, Fisher, Newman, Kenna and Mayor Pro Tem Davis and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Councilwoman Moody voting against. 21. Councilman Kenna moved~ seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to adjourn the meeting of June 25, 1984. Motion carried 7-0. June 25, 1984 Page 12 ADJOURNMENT Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I r7 / City of Xrth Richland Hills, Texas ~/\:1- ~ ~~ ~ TO: Rodger Line City Manager DATE: July 5, 1984 FROM: Wanda Calvert p & Z Coordinator SUBJECT: Cases to be heard by City Council July 9, 1984 PZ 84-41 Request of J. V. Frank Trustee to rezone Lots 8A thru 17B, Block 33, Holiday West Addition, from their present classification of R-4-SD (Separate Ownership Duplex) to C-1 (Commercial). This property is located on the south side of Buenos Aires Drive and approximately 220 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. PZ 84-51 Request of Loren Pelton to rezone a portion of Tract 14B, W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, from its present classification of C-1 (Commercial) to R-5-D (Duplex). This is a 124 foot strip of land located on the south side of Harwood Road, bounded on the south by Grapevine Highway, and is approximately 304 feet east of Colorado Boulevard. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 + JI ) ~, II -1 !1~¥4t [/ i '\ -:l k-: [1 ~ ~ II I I ~I I I . I I I I -I ¡ I I f-- ITJJ¡ fEß ~ ¡Ð ~ -~ 1 r- /I '- II .I /¡ I i Ir----~i , I J__ ,~ I ' I I I I I ì ~ffi~ Ef I I I I II -~ n--- J ~ I r-~ ~ ~ ...~ ,. II I ¡ t." -- .ILUR ~ r L I I SHADY '.~L 1101\0 AG ;- \ , ..1/ rrr 1TTT 1- -L:LLm-::=r- .l.. 1 -~ ~L- /¡ ~ -- -- r- r--- R-2 ~ r--" ~ :~¡ ~N ~ --m 'C-I ~, ~ lAG -- 'r, l_~..._!.;; _.c_. . Ji........,...._. lR-t .- ,- : _'.n .- -.. -," -. .0.... I I .......' ....... 1 ./l RI ,~ 'j --/ }--~ AG ~i R-2 I - ~ AG R-3 W- /L 1 ç-r U , \:J .JIr ~ 'tP-"~I(U, ~A.II AG 'Ç C-2 L--=. ~- S.U.* .J.., ~ VD.!.. -}" ~IT ..... --L- T ì T ~ >?:~ ~-~ >rr r ~~: ~l C-ISU..' ~ ~~ t ~. It rft¡i R-3 3~:\ c~~..~ Ell "->- T cO- iCC- £ _ 3N~~~ ~ rö~ 1- 2 J C 2 :Jlli ~i~ ~ c- :Jr- g; ~H. ~. . f rTrffi'f'f,--~-i ',- AG \ '= C-'" ~ .~.~ ~.~ ~ ~~ ~ '::"þ Æ w-~~!!t "':.:1 :iì{l)~t' -=~~ - . Ei ~Œ?I¡r~G LL. 12~ ÇI[1~jf tiE i_~õ R-7-MF ~~E l~t..{; -"Ji~:7~~rm~ l _ V I . ~ C-I. ,.,,,. ~ilý ~ _ ~~:.. .j TilT t~~!jS_1~r- ~ ~Ih1 -- ... . fJJf~~ ~=Ht-~ cr ~ -~ 'v lit.:t:~ AG E.: 1= f=)--1 1 t ~ ~ 1~ c-' C-I Eli, ~~., ..-;;:~~",.. Il~ -=-~-F ' R- 2 == == . ~ Ptrn::ri~ç I ;;;,¿ :!r ~'d ~ < ~ n r¡ t~i" II \U J Afß =m]E - ~Cl Y ~ 'R-I- ---r-- ~ ~. 1800 _ ~- '7 ,.. C-2" ~~~õ ~ - ~dc OL J /x'~_\. [ - 1_ ~ 1~~"£Lt T-~ ~~ 1TRì ~ 0; II ~r .7ri- J~ ~;;o í ~ it!jl c~~rt ~~~r I ~~=~\\Tr~ ;~u.· - I LR ~ -/ ~~ ~-2 !'~- ~~~ _. . Y{R ~I L":WJ.I /0/ 1,-] n - ,~~t::= H I I ::-:J . I, t f,' 't - I" - . · , R-2-ISOO ., *¿i rl ~_:~t I ,IIUdt-=-=-~(fji~;I'~~~;:~J; ru,~,~ ~IY/: //~ lt~ . _ í.JJ ~~' \ I ~l~ ' ¡ j ,,(i}7\ F.P. ;' C-2 Vy./ - Li ,u"::':'::[~~.OOL ~ == jj I, r'lll,... \ ·r....... _ ' <",'" /'\ R-3- R-5-0 .~ ./ i::- -;:: UH\" II'tN/~,.. ,j ~~:,' ~\ trr '500 ....... !;,~ k:~ ---c:. r,¡Sõ - Wb..N Jill, n ~ ~ """ d_ ,-~~Y'~ '-~ ,I c~~ v::= 1-2 R-' .w_ ee ;~ -<. ;Ù'b~ ,þg~tJ " I M ~l1' _ ~ ¡;¡¡~, ~~ml , ¡I, -=-~ ~ 1 lLL ~ rr(I~'~~/?:/f~~~~~+JJ~ ~~ ~[[ ~2 ~ ~-+--- ~~ Aß GJ.,iJ ..... ." ~: '1 r-1 ~ --1- [ f 1. I"L'-"AI. '-»0. r.. ,¡--~ c: !:JfJ ¡j¡~ .k C I P. I -..J-I.~{]~ ~ i 'ff ~~ ~,~ ql~~' I~ r~~ ~:~~:;~"-----r1~ : : ~ ~ r-- ~-Æ~S' I ~µ:q -i.-,~. ~ '¡¡"i!t"ttht \'0~(JN¿ '-H--{'·;'" /: ~ AGj _ I ¡'j " A~;O~T J' -).' ~ \ lTl t- I , , Ì\ -,J¿! C-I AG C 1 t . H I ~ R-3 , \ Io~_'-D- (><~t ; ß¿¡;:. R-7-IIF AG \ ~ \ AG ... - ) L mtll c-I'~ ~ 2-~~~~ , ' c-, \' \ ~-r: ~~þ~~~' IR-7-W:~ "..', § r-I_2 Q ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~~!~ðlU / - R-3 n" - jl \3i ~,~~ ~ ~~7 L (c- 1-1 I ¡ ¡ sií ~ ~ ~r-: -; R-1-~ ~.u' - ¡ \ ! ~ \v~, ~.~ ~~¡, NTN 'c.. ~c ~ r-i ~ ~ 0-' ~~- 1='~\ ..,. ~ f!jJ :'-r~ ~ p 'y R-Jr-= PO I ...~ I ~ !Ç\::i 1 BoP-' ! .... 3~ ~ C-1 r 'TI rr -r"!' '¡::' H ~.,.~ R-7-MF' ~ : ~ ..>- ç ~ c.~.~ t---- r:' I ¡---j .. ::f ~,,~ ¡;~ .7 ¿j · ~ ;'-'=~l - 'I ~ \~~~ ' 1iFr:n ~ r~ ~ R-1-:: nI1 y ~~ . r; ~ '!-~~1-IIF I' rl(j¡~-, rHE - ~~ 9, I ,,. .. LR v - b.dñ':r:tÎ ~'('::::~~..........,::>,~ 1 2 ,L QJ R f.... , m~~ l\"X:« '" 1+ -'" ~., Ii -" ~ ~ ~ ~ A \ H:ì.~. A \ .~ ~ fJIIÌ -I-SU· ~,\ H , , Lit-- I: - ý-- ~ " R-2 \ ~ (\ À;; R 7 MF \ ... S i ~ ~ \ F.P., R IT V f-- R-7 "'F - - 'r"'" , r-- IC- ~ L ~ '-+'RT n I-l!! R-6-T \\ ~ ~ ~~~. ,~)~ ì\ xm~~ >-¡ fù .,,",,'~' Ci~~¡':z ;~;:= c-,.lJ - .'C.L..O _ 'fT\ ~/\ I ....-' [L[II. ~ V R-7-MF .'0. - ¡ . 1 ! - ____-:'/ Ii C -I ':00' ~ ~ ~~. _, w, _ LR S.U. * ------.............. ß r R U ~~I \ ~ ~~~~~, ~ H. ~ c 19 II lì/-;?'"'i't ~ ~~ R i-.. rr f-.. /, rJI-FlJ-Lt c-R ~ $. ~,. ~\ -: fil r{'i11~ f-~ ~ JÏfi ~~r ~ I I Fti I t-'N t H~ ~.-L ell -.-- t- 1-+ I LL ~ ~nB ~ rT~ 1- j I I t ¡ hl EîîÍ!lB 11 \i[' II I I --: ~~It= 1'1 -\~ J\\1\l1 ~ =" ;' 8~\\'~-~n._ ~\\~.. j ~! ~. i;- .~ C-2 L ,_ r \\~J~ 'Ff \ ~ TnT '-___ _ t-' ~\ . . ,ì l1fì Jl 1 i ! I· !,:.:: rî. U L:ù.. -j l-L.L \ ' J [llJ L jJ¿ ~ I' J- ~ - rmfîfÎTRRTITTTlmnTtftr~i' f ) ~' 5~ ~1' : ~. l,~:t ~lll I 11.1 ¡ E , t= n- J r- ._ - "--1:' i ' "V <.~: .T f- -¿-- :=~ I....,I,! 11,1 411: I ~ ~ - ~ 10::' I i .:= ~ ._,r~.~/ \ 1, ~ ~~.I ~>?~, R-1-M ~ ~,"I J±:~ ~ ~jp L:~ A .-; ~ i"I. C-I C-' -~e'- ~;:;:.~~ ~.c: l..,_F r ~r : II ~ Ii ,~~ C~~~ . R-..t ~ ~d.. ' .,__~ \R-~ ,I 'i ~ 0 /~ ~§R-3~ ~l~:-:t..r>f: C-I~ ~ ê s rm ~ r- ~t= ~þ ~..~ bJlEt: III ôJllID ::\1 ~~¡ ~ ~ (" \'í ~~ 5~~ \ I I AG R-3- Isea .. 11~ ~ ~ AG AG -- ..... ".... n\j H ;. t - tr; _ ~~ J c IJ II! rlUtttt¡ n/if7 rr ~~ÎI U\ \ \ l~~IT ~ J Li1l I 1Tr\ U-l.c-..J-.J,-:r:.= m t-'- 0 - \u '. Imfl ~ m, ¡ttfi1~~~~í1 ::'À~~ II '~~ 'ffiffifft m:n.,\\ ~'ì'\' r- ~ ~ ! I l~lT ~1-\ \ \\~~1\\.U~~ := ~-v 1 I r' UIIIIIII: I U .\~ ...--- I I --.lJJJ:rrnf i 'I ~ ~ ~ ~~ )I)- r--I, - - - ~ ~ I Rt- ~'d:~~-r3i = ~f, ~ -H±UW'Ulkt ! : , . ; ¡J¡; ~ -Jj OmTn~ 9:=:-fT:]TIl r-: Wi, ,ID I ~~ ~IITr ~ I FHtHTF !iTHlT[U]B ~~illJ¡ ~ íìT~'-- AG ~ R-7- MF · := IT t-t r H C -I , H T :~ '-' ,m rmn p - atfST 0" C- l;EtãB dtlli R-I r-- AG II¡ 1 a I--- - AG H R-3- ISOO ¡ ! ~ ~ '-lX H :1 7.~~ 1\ mEE r-'-'-'~~éTJ~ ~ 1 ~'H~ ~i~~,1, F-:~ -tl~~ r#;:,~ ' ~F-f--~~~~~2~t :-::::. r ,,"'.\\ :::C~0~1.~' ;-v~~\~ ~ ·NLN~^ ___ III j ,'z; ~~ì~\Ld ~ I~ ~ ~ t}. ~ ~ : '\ ~~ 1.1. illJJ ).-'- ~~ ~ ; \ =~t' >-..--; ----~.- --" -- - r ~~ rr , ~ \v ~ Qt¡~ 0 III t-Î H1<:r :; ~ z 7; I"h - í¡ t ~ \', I-I \', su. \ ' \ -Th P. I , , , ) , I , I I I , , I \ l I \ \ n~ \ i i , 'I .,r--- .'I-'(~ /í /"--.::-- " I,' R-7 - ~F f ( I 1 \ \\ \ r- l- t-. h. s::17l" r- x:8!~ " ~ ^- y J... ~. >-f..: - ¡; " illl ~~ TIt ~~ Ë --¡ n ----I rï1TTTlTR r- --- 1-\ ~ ~~) ~ -r -i ","VI u. R-3 kJ 1-2 0------- C- ¿,,J fz ¿ r C-' ~~¡;, >-PO I]~[ w~;-;; l~~ ~þ-O ~ 0,):7 ~ ~ ~~~ h~r~' ~ J ~~ ~f~ ~ r--.- t<~ II I I ~ '\ .,~~~/'::' --"., --fJ:~ ~1! I iT+- rl. ~r~-' / ~,-:_ _~ -- \ ~ L. [~ ~~.~ fjP'/' ..l 'I ~J IR~~M~ ~:::~=:: -;;'/4~~~~ R-1-MF ~ cs-~* ~'~l-t c- ---{ : / r~"=-/' " ~ LR S.U. "~'~..1(").<\ r- .-\; I >--!--L-J ~ ~ s~üo~~~~y!>)::: ( ~ - = ~}-- -1t=. ~ - ~~ \ .""_. J;~ Il \. ~- c-tr "... NR ~t(,~\ rš~ ~?i.11 L~:: ~~.. . r~ . .' --- ~ '... "'G"_.t L~.ÍJ.' - e'~ rs~u~ - C-tS.U.· 'e-I S.u. I R-7-MF C-2 ~ OC l£fi~HtI i(i~ ) R-1-IIF-PO ~ I I ~W~s: ~~):'~ ~ ~ ~Vj~';: ~ ~~~ .~ w- -'" · ~ " n _'" .,,""~ R-6-T-PO ~II! '....'....~' I \§R1TITI __ ~~~t1JTÐ. _ I- H ./flrlll rlm¡JTìl\A \~ " C-2t: :-- ~ '\\ " c- ~-L ¡ t.4 rt PO \ ,'\.. //~ . \ \ " \'V ~....... '. \ \ +- H- I ~- H= U \¿C-I rf. . ~ , ~~ \ ~ ~~ __ ~_ , J . \ \ Tf~ ~ /' L R-7-tE ~= \ \ - I, ~ r:: I \ \__ 1]1' ~ - I ~ I I - ~ ~R ~~\ rp~ :J: ~ ~ c- ;p n ~ ¡- (l(M ..... 820 / ~ M --1::::¡ ¡..... .7' I ~,tì-7- u ~ R-7 M U AG AG R-!- 1500 1-' í I , l \ \ 1-1 \"" su. , \ \ ~.p. , , , j , I , , I f , I I \ I 1 i' II:::: ~(\'ý ~ l~ H~ /'Y:A 1 1 ~~ I I , I 1 -y -6' ! .y '--:~ y'-= ~ C-' T\ ~ ~ ~ I ...JJ. ~Ll, > - v ;..r-"F ,I ....,..~ R-7-MF' w, ~ \.). A/ ~ Cot' ~ I .2:-" ¥ 1 'I I '\ X \( I '- \ ~ ~y ~ 5 U · fWWL ~["'OAL. "OLLS [L[. _ ~ I r,.:: L ~ R' 01~~ i1 R-7-MF t-:fH - t- ~I .~. II l f>.!J:l ]L]/-<- c- ~ IIC-u.' . -/ J ì [;KHIF . r~ LR V 't- ..... ~J-:3; ~ " R-3 1 2 C-2 m ~rs A'7-"F ,. H~: C-I r ~>M ~ ~T lEd~ - <:::::>-- -,1-- ~ ,- I-< ::-- - \ >X y ~,.. (( "1', .5 ~ _1-50· \III ,,~ \ ,-,'~ ~ ~ ~ .. " ...- (~A \ \ ~ ,:..", , 1::1- ~ /'" \ R-2 " R ~ tyÀ .-L~ ~,. ~- .N><. R-7-MF \ I L n T ~ . ~ ::.-- \ F.P., R ~ ~;ç '--I'"\- \-t r- ~ R-7 ~F r.. " \ , >::::-:::' ~ '-' '.-In:7TV' '-I it ~ A-6-T \ \ C-I C-2 S.· ~~'~ _, ~_ ,,~~ .11L ìTI.~~'-:::~- ' · ./ fz _ __ _ =ca / " ~.~.);:~ ~""W> ."m ~'" i< c.ß.e... S .. ~- C -I ,-_J ' ~-' ~~ ~c- ~.~. .-- I.! '\ ~ ¡ >--' .... :a . . · C-2 i I [ I"""' I Co, ., ~ ~¡.:o 111 ............ C-I ,~._' ".~. l II >-.---' IlMtc. LLJ--J ì r ~D 'f!/d3~'~If"¡. >-PD m LR~I.. ----L U f+ >- >-~I~ - ~ I j~~J~~ ,;r 1'~~1 Ë: IjV;~_I~~~" ~ ____ v. '- .... ~ Y: · If ~1\-tt1 idJ A I u ~ ---. i" \ I<~ 'I IIII ..,., 1.1 ¡,. P ..~ ~, , l-tt::: -2 Î ïìîTl T I~ ~:"Ç~?~",\ '-EU~[ l'l,rl ~ ~~.I I j \ 1I-7-"F-PO ~~----=--_ --1 ..: "l~"¡.¡W~ ~'t{r0/~~ .~~~~\R w :lf~ E ~ C~~Y""'·"'~ ~ -~P'/I-f Iff 1 T <. ~~F=f~¡:: r::: rrr . ~ 'I'f-t[:l..=" IL J',-+- fTf-h"o.' cD "'...\\' It R-7-MF ~y/),;/ r- ~. -¡ " ~-r I " __ X" /2-'tV.... t: >- \7I\7l . -i -i ï I 1,";::01.' 1=\ <"!:f.:¡. ."., PO / ~Á'>~' H'H ,~>- ·,/1 / ~ ~ SC,-ul- "'" X" -..,: "'"'" >- ~H I III I 3-i ,-, ,I - ,\ r C 2 C ,c<Y'^-<'Ml.:'f " I ~ ~y +~.o ~'X.À~~ ~~ .L \\~ ~~¡.--A11 ff~ R-1-Mf ..~~U.* ~":-'~~.~-ut 1--'--: . I --dt:=--~ I. \f-I-- _," .'C"'... <L[. ~Þi:J ~~ _ L-- I- . . ~. LR I.,J! ;./~:V -' '- t: ~,.' \ Ii ,.-1- V T. ..._ .n" .- ¡=f¡1 ,11T1l ~,fLf ~!;~V\( .ar >- H-- '-1lL: ~ R-6-T-PD [ ill II! l~t:::'J;I¡j, r I UTIIHJ I ¡III[ I II III F - \.. '"'~~~~I~f::'1 .:.':':':.1 i~. H ~ ./16( / ~(_\< ~/./ / l1.' lli I-- 1--1-- H \ b ~ \ > ~¡ U ]rl t--- ~" .... S. CoI - VlS.U, . -- s u _ rlllr1l'T1¡iT~~::?7:m ITI __ ,t- ~~~,';1\1\\\\\ ~l),\\;~ r~K ", ,<""~"ïa~~." /~' .-' ,>- ,-" ,~~. . 1\" C-2 \' C-2 C C-2 Ii'-. : '- I Jj u 1 Ie:: ~ ". ~01Iill\ !ì'trTmlT ¡t= t: ' '----'1 ~ ~ , " l' rr IíUlli~\LImJJI' 1,1 11 1 00- '--:', C-I ULl ~ b4 A PO \ /11-~I-1R%LiJLI fTTltmTRBT1'lT!mn-n-1ìi'~i r ~w~...., .s, \ \ ! I ';:::+= \ ~6~t- ~\ -H11 T I", ,'1~ tJ [jWi 1 ITT.' ~ '.r-'t-- t' I+- I-+- U A-7 ~~~_IT· 1]: t£'£Hjf~pi}~'wr~Æ~~~1 C-'r-' \~~\ ~;:~'=-/ ~ A-J " ,~1~V>- 0-7-" Â'\! ~ k HI 1 ~ '1,' l'~lt~~ \ \111:~: ::~ <)~~,.. C-I c., ~i~t= :-;.:.. rTD8- ·i r ~A 7 / ~ 1- \,' ~r,::~~ ; , Á j --< ~l R \ E"'· 'fi ._.- t - 1 // / / ff1\,. U - 1 ..2 ,~:- ffl ~ =L1. /1 . I " fo- I r---: H v I I I I I \ ;·iJ!:l,' I c:::!]L L-. "".; ; _-, Þ\ :='~ R.o. -¡:= è, f ---I, l-U- U'~7- - ~ ,11; ~.; 1 1 ;' C-I ~p n ¡-. ,m- c= ~ so ~ n~~C- "F IY/ ' . ø~ :15 ~ S, RIT-3 ~ jj... _. ,- ~,...,.¡....I - ~ ~ c-' · " V' , þ¡¡ >-- '~ ~~ C-2 ~. ( ~~.. R ~ I c-=2 0 -l R JJT~ lf~ l ~ ~' ~::íJ;II./\ 1n \ ~ ~ ~ .'..::~ I,i 111'- I A,-~2 - >---, l-cJt~ I ~ v/ ~ t= ~ 1 CITTII...~.IIIII II ÎJ-l~ n ~ : H' I c: 1-2 c- v.... " Ë ëßJ A ' _1. í§~~r tl ~ ~ ~ ;. .., - <" s. u i:::::. -J .1:' t. T 1 T ¡ '=I-c- >Ii >0> ~ýcx.l/. ~~ ~. ..::4..-:: (Jq "" 'T"j :1. ~ ß ;¡<,i: X 7-1'1 'iI ~,,>, >'t-. ._ ~J~ ~ '~' , J .I ~j -" V ì=1~= ~1;:;i~'1~ . ~ -'¿" u1- " ~q I ~~1~lJ ....... I ß=im;~' - ",. CR-"'-"'- .-...-0 c, -IV Y · EÐ¡ R-I ~ ~ >- F. p c- · ~ ~~ t 1-2 ~ ~ONING MAP 0; ~;R~; ;I~HLAND HILLS ~~~7 '¡¡¡y d u/ II!Iiõ II- ," 1\ I' /'---- ,~ I " R-7-~F I ! , \. l¿ \, C- R-3 C-, I F.P. ...~+ .:t:'''~~ --- - '\~.. I R-7-MF 1-2 ~-- C-2 ~ --- c- OC - -:.. . . L DATE ORDINANCE NO. REVISIONS AFTER THIS ItAP WAS PREPARED IT ItN ACCORDANCE WITH UPOATlNi PRO OCT, 4, InT. THIS IIAP IS PUlL THE CITY Of NOIITH RICHLAND HIL LIAlLE fOR OIlISSIONS ANO lOR E LEG ADOPTED --- .,... J'~/';S'~TARY -1J ŒD SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT-'··· 'I ŒÐ SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT- - - . . c:ÆÐ SINGLE FAM IL Y DISTRICT- - . - . I R-4-SDj ~5~t~:T~I~~R~~~SHIP. . , . - . . , I R-5-Dl DUPLEX DiSTRiCT'··"'·,' , I R-6-T I ~g~~H~~~~Rtc~D GARDEN, , , , . IR-7-MF] MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT' , . , , . , ŒIJ OFFICE DISTRICT m=:J LOCAL RETAIL DISTRICT CB=:J COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~ OUTDOOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT UTI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ŒÐ MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT CD fNC~~~~+lg~UR;I~T~~~ [!Q:J PLANNED DEVELOPMENT m:::J SPECIFIC USE. PERMIT ITU FLOOD PLAIN DISTRICT ~ AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT :Ë L 1 ,¡"" ~I"'>"-' MAYOR ~ . 'A I.., CJ as ~ r DATE THIS MAP CURRENT THROUGH ORDINANCE NO. 1085 OR THROUGH LAST ORDINANCE LISTED IN REVISION BLOCK. CHAIRMAN I PLANNING a ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY. PLANNING a ZONING COMMISSION ~.~'I '/ i I DATE: July 9, 1984 e I SUBJECT: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIR.ED: I- I DEPARTMENT: !ACKGROUND: approximately 220 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. PZ 84-41 Zoning request from R-4-SD to C-l on Lots 8A thru l7B. Bloc k 33.. Holiday West Add it ion. Planning and Zoning This property is located on the south side of Buenos Aires Dr ive and Mr. Fenimore, co-owner of property wishes to build sttiD shoppin¡ center for offices and retail space. There ~ere none who spoke in opposition to this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of -2 with Ms. Nash and Mr. Hannon votin a ainst. Approval or denial of zoning rPQl1P~t BUDCETED ITÐf: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO x ..2/~ (!~ I- Page 2 p & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 I Ie I I ---'---~----~---;;~~:~b eon. He stated Mr. Gideon is a 70 year old man and said he must withdraw these requests because he was not financially able to do all the Engineer's letter required. ---------- ----------- ~ ......___.._ _.. ..._~............... ·..w·....-... ___.~.....__...__________ _ _,._...~__ ....~-~.......,. ....-.......~ 4. PZ 84-41 I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Request of J. V. Frank Trustee to rezone Lots 8A thru 17B, Block 33, Holiday West Addition, from their present classification of R-4-SD (Separate Ownership Duplex) to C-1 (Commercial). This property is located on the south side of Buenos Aires Drive and approximately 220 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Bill Fenimore, one of the owners of the property, came forward. He stated he felt this zoning is compatible with the surrounding zoning. Mr. Fenimore said this property joins C-1 on two sides, Multi-Family on one side, and was close to Rufe Snow. He said they plan to build a strip shopping center for lease space for real estate and insurance offices, etc. Mr. Fenimore said the type of office buildings they usually build are 9 to 5 parking and he feels this would be a pleasant shopping center off Rufe Snow. Chairman Tucker asked if this was to be office space or a strip retail center. Mr. Fenimore said it would be an office center with office buildings to the rear and adjacent to it, but it could have some retail shops. Chairman Tucker said if it is a shopping center, it could have more than 9 to 5 parking. I- I Ie ...... Page 3 P & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 I I I I I I Ie I PZ 84-41 APPROVED I I I I ______ I _-- I Ie I 5. PZ 84-42 Mr. Fenimore said that was correct. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hannon said this would be a 1,000 foot finger of Commercial in a residential area. He said there is duplex zoning on the east side and only 4 or 5 lots abut Commercial zoning. Mr. Hannon said he does not feel it would present a problem if it stayed residential. Mr. Wood said there are office buildings joining this property and he does not see a problem with this request and he is in favor of the request. Chairman Tucker said since this would be just a strip center, the difference in traffic would not present much of a problem. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 84-41 as requested. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 3-2 with Ms. Nash and Mr. Hannon voting against. Request of Richland Hills Church Christ for confirmation e R-7-MF zoning in Ordina 033. This propert ocated on the south side rtheast Loop 820, west of Rufe Snow Drive, and bounded on the south by the TESCO right-of-way. This case was withdrawn until June 21, 1984. I' · I Ie I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I f f- KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, , NC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas May 31, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZON!NG CA~£ ~Z 84-41 REVIEW LETTER, 2ðNINf, ~BºR R-4-SD TO C-1 ~EF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 112 We have received the referenced zoning case for Our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ø,~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician May 31, 1984 PZ 84-41 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METR0/267-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. l \ -¿ l AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-41 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-4-SD to C-1. Being Lots 8-A through 17-B, Block 33, Holiday West, Section 9, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, being described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of Lot 18, Block 33, Holiday West, Section 8, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, also being in the South R.O.W. line of Buenos Aires Drive; Thence South 89 Degrees 41 Minutes East 761.48 feet; Thence South 00 Degrees 25 Minutes 55 Seconds West 110.0 feet; Thence North 89 Degrees 41 Minutes West 761.33 feet; Thence North o Degrees 20 Minutes 26 Seconds East 110.0 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1.92 acres of land. I~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located on the South side of Buenos Aires Drive and approximately 220 feet East of Rufe Snow Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. r". '. -.f 6{~~~ C ';:;;:;Br CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION <---J"1-7 " ,.- ~~,:;; ~ /J SEC~T~Y ;ZZ~~:;~ ~{N~ CO;::~~~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-81 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1984. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I- I SUBJECT: I' I I I I I I 91 DATE: July 9. 1984 PZ 84-51 Zoning re~uest from C-l to R-5-D on a portion of Tract 14B. W. w. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606. DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning 8ACKGROUND: This property is a 124 foot strip of land located on the south side of Harwood Road, bounded on the sou tn, bv Grapevine Highwav. and approximately 304 feet east of Colorado Boulevard. There is R-S-D zoning to the west of this Dronertv. but is not wide enou~h to develop. so they are requesting this zoning to allow them to build a street and have duplexes on both sid es . There were none who spoke in opposition to this reQuest. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this reQuest. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or ñpn;~l nf 7nn,ng roq"9~t BUDCETED ITD!: ACCOUNT NUKBER: YES N/A NO ~~ (!~ x I- Page 17 P & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 ~ I ~'"'-S-&.~............... ~_ 11. PZ 84-48 I I I I 12. PZ 84-49 I I Ie I I 13. PZ 84- 50 J',.J A;~ I I I 14. PZ 84-51 I I Ie I .../" ./'. ... ~ /' ..' ~ IJI~"""" ,,/ -/ / Request of California-Texas Properties, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 4Al & 5, Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to C-1 (Commerci This property is located at e northwest corner of Davis oulevard and Green Valley Drive. This case was withgrawn prior to the meeting. / .'~ I' ,,"" Request of ~lifornia-Texas Properti~~; Inc. to rezone a portion of Tra~~s 4A1 & 5, Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from their pr~sent classification of AG ~<Ágriculture) to R-7-MF (Mulit-Family) ~This property is located on the north side of Green Valley Drive, bounded on the east by Davis Boulevard, and on the north by the TESCO right of way. This case was withdrawn prior to the meeting. Request of California-Texas Properties, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 4A1 & 5, Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-6-T (Garden Homes). This property is located north of Green Valley Drive and west of Davis Boulevard. This case was withdrawn prior to the meetin . Request of Loren Pelton to rezone a portion of Tract 14B, W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, from its present classification of C-l (Commercial) to R-5-D (Duplex). This is a 124 foot strip of land located on the south side of Harwood Road, bounded on the south by Grapevine Highway, and is approximately 304 feet east of Colorado Boulevard. 1- Page 18 p & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 Ie I I I I I I I Ie PZ 84-51 APPROVED I I 15. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 1080 I I I ADJOURNMENT I I I I SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of tl1is request to please come forward. Mr. Pelton came forward. He said he needs the 156 feet to be usable so they can have two sides with a street to Grapevine Highway. Mr. Schwinger asked if it will go from Harwood to Grapevine Highway. Mr. Pelton said it would. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak in opposition to this request, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 84-51. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. Consideration of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1080. Chairman Tucker said he wou the Commission postpone is they have more time study re-write this dment. ade the motion to table this This motion was seconded by and the motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:25 P. M. CHAIRMAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ................-.- _.....T~... -.~.....~ ,..~...~....... I~ II e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . ... ( ( K NOWL TON-E NG II SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 31, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-0021 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONIN~ CASE PZ 84-51 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-l TO R-5-D REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 124 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. u;, Oa-:- RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician May 31, 1984 PAGE 1 PZ 84-51 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG,. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ,I I I I I Ie I ,/t) ORDINANCE NO. I ( .; g AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-51 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-1 to R-5-D. A Tract or parcel of land out of the W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract Number 1606, situated in Tarrant County, Texas, and more particularly a part of that certain 20-5/8 acre tract in said Survey as described in Volume 5252, Page 764, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and this part is described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin which bears South 89 Degrees 48 minutes East a distance of 156.0 feet from the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Clearview Addition to the City of North Richland Hills according to the Plat recorded in Volume 388-11, Page 106, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said corner being in the West line of said 20-5/8 acre tract and in the South line of Harwood Road; THENCE South 89 degrees 48 minutes East along the South line of said road 124 feet to an iron pin for corner; Thence South 902.55 feet to an iron pin for corner in the Northwesterly line of State Highway Number 26; THENCE South 52 degrees 15 minutes 10 seconds West along the North line of said Highway, 156.82 fee~ to an iron pin for corner said iron pin is the Southwest corner of a 3.79 acre tract; THENCE North along the East line of said 3.79 acre tract 998.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 2.69 acres more or less. I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This is a 124 foot strip of land located on the South side of Harwood Road, bounded on the South by Grapevine Highway and is approximately 304 feet East of Colorado Boulevard. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. 4~ c h~r CHAIRMAN ANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ,e:{) ~ ~/ /J "-' .: - :;/( ~~~ ING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-51 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I II . .,. DATE: July 9, 1984 I I e SUBJECT: Appointment of Representative and Alternate Representative to CONET I DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Administration The attached Resolution is needed to appoint a Representative and I Alternate Representative to CONET. I CONET was first established in 1974. On March 21, 1984, the cities and chambers of Northeast Tarrant County met to discuss the reorganization of I CONET. On April :25, 1984 a second meeting was held and member cities and chambers voted to reestablish the organization~ Mayor Echols was voted as I temporary Chairman. Annual dues are $25.00. I CONET'S purpose is the formation of cities/Chamber of Commerce of Northeast Tarrant County into a united effort primarily aimed at obtaining Ie I needed funding for development of thoroughfares in northeast Tarrant County. I I I I I I f' CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Resolution appointing Representative and Alternate Representative to CONET I BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A NO N/A I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I (I J <-)q RESOLUTION NO. Ò RESOLUTION APPOINTING DIRECTOR TO CONET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that be and hereby is appointed Representative to CONET and is hereby appointed Alternate Representative to represent the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on the Board of Directors of Cities/Chambers of North East Tarrant (CONET) effective from this date and until their successors have been appointed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the payment of a membership fee of twenty-five ($25.00) Dollars is hereby authorized. PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of July, 1984. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary I .' . Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I i' I 12.. DATE: July 9, 1984 SUBJECT: Amending Ordinance 316 - Park & Recreation Board DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The duties and responsibilities of the Park and Recreation Board, as currently written in Ordinance 316, are believed to be inconsistent with the Council/Manager form of government. The attached amendment to Ordinance 316 has been rewritten to indicate that this Board serves in an advisory capacity to the Council. These changes were discussed and approved at the Pre-Council Meeting on June 25, 1984. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Ordinance BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A I .' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ORDINANCE NO.' BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that ORDINANCE NO. 316 J "Establishing a Parks and Recreation Commission" J adopted April 27th, 1970 J and as heretofore amended J be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. The Parks and Recreation Commission of the City shall hereafter be known as the Park and Recreation Board. 2. Ordinance 316 of the City is amended to substitute the word "Board" wherever the word "Commission is used. 3. The Board shall act in an advisory capacity to advise the City Council and City 1\1anager concerning the acquisition, development J maintenance and use of parks, playgrounds and open spaces in the City and shall conduct its business at such times and under such rules and regulations as it may prescribe. It shall be the duty of the Board to immediately and at all times thereafter make continuous study of the needs of the City for the establish- ment of public parks and recreation facilities J to investigate and recommend the locations or sites at which public parks and recreation facilities should be made available within the municipal limits J suggest means of acquiring and developing such facilities and furnish the City Council and City Manager with over-all plans for development and improvement of all such facilities and to report to the City Council and City Manager the results of its studies, recommendations J and plans. In the performance of these duties said Board shall act in an advisory capacity. It is specifically provided that said Board shall have no authority to spend nor to commit the City to the expenditure of any funds or monies whatsoever J except under the specific authorization and direction of the City Council and City Manager. PASSED AND APPROVED, this 9th day of July, 1984. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Hex Mc.t;ntlre - CIty Attorney I .". . IE DATE: July 9, 1984 I I eSUBJECT: Amending Ordinance 324 - Library Board I DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: The duties and responsibilities of the Library Board, as currently written in Ordinance 324, are believed to be inconsistent with the Council/ Manager form of government. The attached amendment to Ordinance 324 has been rewritten to indicate that..this Board serves in an advisory capacity to the Council. These changes were discussed and approved at the Pre-Council Meeting on June 25, 1984. Administration I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ,I ,- I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ADprove/Di~a~rovP nrn;nrln~A BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A I, .' · I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that ORDINANCE 324, "Establishing a Library Board", adopted June 22, 1970, and as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended at Section IV to read as follows: The Board shall act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and City Manager with reference to the development, equipping, expansion and operating of the Library system. It shall be the duty of the Board to immediately and at all times thereafter make continuous study of the needs of the City for the establishment of public Library facilities, to investigate and recommend the location of public Library facilities, suggest means of acquiring and developing such facilities and furnish the City Council and City Manager with over-all plans and specifications for development and improvement of all such facilities and report to the City Council and City Manag·er the results of its studies, recommenda- tions, and plans. In the performance of these duties said Board shall act in an advisory capacity. It is specifically provided that said Board shall have no authority to spend nor to commit the City to the expenditure of any funds or monies whatsoever, except under the specific authorization and direction of the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of July, 1984. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - City Attorney I.. I I e SUBJECT: Ii' DATE: July 9, 1984 Amending Ordinance 797 - Cable TV I DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: As discussed at Pre-Council Meeting, June 25, 1984, Section 29 of Ordinance 797 is amended to more currently define the duties and responsibilities of the Cable TV Board. This amendment also changes the name from Community Cable TV Advisory Panel to Cable Television Board. I I I I I Ie I I 'I I I I I Ie I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Ordinance BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A I . . 1 I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that: 1. The Community Cable TV Advisory Panel shall hereafter be known as the Cable Television Board. 2. Ordinance No. 797 of the City is amended as follows: Section 29 - Cable Television Board There is hereby established a 7 place Board whose function it shall be to monitor the operation of the cable television system to insure compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. The Board shall handle citizen complaints and be empowered to hold hearings to verify allegations and arbitrate citizen/company differences. In addition, the Board shall aid the cable company in screening applicants for time on the public access channels which are designated for the exclusive use of citizens of North Richland Hills. The Board shall act in an advisory capacity to the Mayor, City Council and City Manager with reference to the development, equipping, expansion and operating of the municipal cable channel, currently identified as CITICABLE 36. It shall be the duty of the Board to immediately and all times thereafter make continuous study of the needs of the City for municipal cable TV facilities, to investigate and recommend the location of an adequate municipal cable facilities, suggest means of acquiring and developing such facilities and furnish the City Council and City Manager with over-all plans and specifications for development and improvement of all such facilities and to report to the City Council and City Manager the result of its studies, recommendations, plans and specifications into effect, but only upon the specific approval and under the specific directions of the Council. In the performance of these duties said Board shall act in an advisory capacity. It is, nevertheless, there specifically provided that said Board shall have no authority to spend nor to commit the City to the expenditure of any funds or monies whatsoever, except under the specific authorization and direction of the City Council. The Board shall hold regular monthly meetings at such time and place as it may fix, and such special meetings as may be called by the Chairman or at the request of any tow (2) members of the Board. The Board is hereby authorized to provide for the election of a Vice Chairman, who shall preside in the absence of the Chairman, and is further authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations governing its own proceedings as it may deem advisable. I~ . I Ie I I I I I I Ie I :1 I I I I I Ie I Page Two The Board members shall be appointed by the City Council for a term of two (2) years and shall include at least one member from each of the following vocations: Place (1) local clergy, Place (2) Birdville Independent School District, Place (3) Tarrant County Junior College, Place (4) City Staff and Place (5-7) three (3) citizens. Place 1, 3, 5 and 7 shall be appointed in June of each odd numbered year, and places 2, 4 and 6 shall be appointed in June of each even numbered year. Vacancies for any unexpired term shall be filled by City Council appointment as heretofore provided. The Board shall elect its own chairman, vice-chairman and secretary from among its membership and shall schedule at least one meeting per month. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1984. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - City Attorney I ,~ I I- SUBJECT: I~ DATE: July 9, 1984 Resolution - Policy on Obtaining Drainage Easements I DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: This proposed resolution details the City policy on obtaining drainage II CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: II- I I I I I I- I ,I I I I I I I easements for proper flood control and drainage system. This resolution establishes the policy that citizens donate the necessary easements and not expect monetary compensation when the City expends funds to relieve neighborhood flooding and drainage conditions. Approve/Disapprove Resolution BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A I , .. I I- I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I- I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A GENERAL POLICY CONCERNING THE PURCHASE OF EASEMENTS Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The City shall not engage in the practice of purchasing drainage easements for the purpose of solving flooding problems. 2. Where flooding exists and there is no city drainage system installed and when one is needed, the City will attempt to obtain drainage easements from property owners in order to install adequate drainage at City I S expense, but the property owner in the affected area will be expected to grant such easements at no expense to the City. 3. This policy ,is established on the premise that citizens of North Richland Hills should help to solve and/or relieve flooding conditions and in the spirit be willing to make the necessary drainage easemen~,s conveyances' without expectation of actual monetary compensation. PASSES AND APPROVED this 9th day of July, 1984...~,~. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore ~ City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex' !et:Entire ... City Attorney I. I I e SUBJECT: /íÞ DATE: July 9, 1984 Bee Ordinance I I I I DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: This ordinance establishes rules for keeping bees within the City. The Council directed that this item be placed on the agenda for discussion and consideration. I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove ordinance BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A I. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the keeping of bees within 300 feet of a residence is a nuisance and is dangerous to the health and general welfare of the City and its inhabitants. THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. No persons shall GSn&trygt, plaoo er maintain any beeâ~ within 300 feet of any residence other than that of the ownere QXCQpt wi th t.he ~0.u3cnt of 'the oecupant.s of a-ll --suc-a ~esidel~Ce5~ '2. c' i~ , , ? . ~- .';'JJ-..~ . þO-", ..... . i I - . 2·'· I rY'- -/ .. ,~~ (:.c4-V~L.._- . - .." t.... ; I ',,:' (.I . t,' .,.,t ,(\"'t ~ ,; ---¿"~" I L-',~(ß~·""'~ y" This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from the date of passage and approval and publication as required by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of July, 1984. Mayor Dan Echols ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - City Attorney I I Ie I I I I I I Ie 'I II I I I I I -- I 17 DATE: July 9, 1984 SUBJECT: Right-of-way Acquisition, Glenview Drive DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: Notification letters to property owners, appraisals and offer letters have been completed for property owners fronting Glenview from Booth Calloway to Willman. Request Council approval to purchase ROW in the amount indicated: Harold Pollman $1,950 ANTA Co. (or current owner) 815 Catholic Church 8,675 Methodist Church 4,325 Michael Grant 1,085 TOTAL $16,850 Cost of ROW for this project is $2.50 to $4.00 per square foot based on independent appraisals. Q /~ t.~/}1/t1^' ?7fd.& CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval 'to pnr~h~ ~p r; ghi--nf -w~y f ~l t:)n'\T; t:)W n,...; 'tTO BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: GO Bonds I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I; DATE: July 9, 1984 SUBJECT: Right-of-way - Flory Street Project DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: Right-of-way for the Flory Street Project has been negotiated for Parcels 2, 7, 8, 9 and 21, belonging to Walker Construction Company. Request Council approval to purchase this right-of-way in the amoW1t of $9,360. Mr. Walker's estimated assessment is $21,164.31. Request Council approve an additional $31,300 for purchasing the right-of-way on the remaining 32 parcels of property. Total right-of-way acquisition costs for this project is $40,600. Estimated assessment is $90,057. ( .. d(/J¿j~.1~ j ! ~ø CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Project Approval to purchase right-of-way on Flory Street BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO GO Bonds I I .ECT: I DATE: 6-26-84 I~ Chapman Road Street and Drainage Improvements Public Works DEPARTMENT: IACKGROUND: I The consensus of opinion at the Pre-Council meeting on June 25, 1984, was for the Council to consider approving the rebuilding of Chapman Road at the next council meeting. The major reason for requesting the rebuilding of this I road at this time is because Chapman Road is in such bad sha e that we are not going to be able to maintain it in a proper manner in the comin months. There are quite a few developers developing along the frontage of this road and they will be responsible for their share of the rebuilding of this road where it fronts their subdivision. The balance of the road does not have I good drainage so therefore it makes it impossible for us to keep any type of surface on the roadway. I As you can see from a copy of the engineer's letter, the estimated cost for rebuilding the road is $1,300,000. With the developers paying their cost up front this would reduce the project cost $753,611. Also another item I that would reduce the cost or another item that is included in another project would be the box culvert on Chapman Road. The cost of this culvert is included I in the Morgan Meadows East project. This estimated cost is about $85,000. I Another item that would reduce the cost to the city would be the assessments that come in immediately and in the future. I I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the rebuilding of Çhapmap Ro~ð I ~GETD> ITEM: I ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES NO x General Obligation Bonds ~'(~ I. f Ie I I I I I I I Fox Hollow __ Carl Powell C"ommercialFront I I I I Project Cost Less Property Owner Participation I ~~·'.P ~~... I ~ 4··oÆJ' . I , I JUNE, 1984 CHAPMAN DRIVE STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY RECOUP COST CALCULATIONS SUBDIVISION/OWNER ESTIMATED LENGTH Tract 3A2 1,200' Richfield Add. Sabine Valley 1,300' Fox Hollow Wayne Steward 1,988 Fox Hollow Burk Collins 702 372 4,726 Residential Front 1,472 Residential Side 2,880 Park 1,360 TOTALS 16,000 Precent of Total Estimated Project Cost Total Estimated Project Cost PRELIMINARY COST/FOOT $ 62.83 62.83 62.83 62.83 62.83 28.76 17.83 12.07 0.00 .;-.~"'..,_. ' ~... . T . , \ ......... ,\,. ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $ 75,396 81,679 124,906 44,107 23,373 135,920 26,246 34,762 0 $ 546,389 42% $1,300,000 $ 753,611 I " I' s ,) I Ie I I I 1/ I I I . II I I I I I I r I K NOWL TON-E NG II SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 30, 1984 Mr. Gene Riddle, Public Works Director City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-007, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CHAPMAN ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PREL. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE & ASSESS. CALCS. In accordance with your request, we have prepared a pre-design Engineer's Estimate of the cost of paving and drainage improvements on Chapman Road. Attached is a cost estimate tabulation and preliminary assessment calculation tabulation. A sketch is also included of the proposed street and drainage improvements along with a preliminary right-of-way strip map sketch showing additional right-of-way requirements. The design and right-of-way sketches are very preliminary and subject to further detailed study. The estimated street and drainage construction costs total ðbout $1,300,000. The esttmated construction cost per front foot for escrow purposes totals about $62.83, which includes $6.05 for curb and gutter, $31.41 for paving, and $25.37 for storm drainage construction (box culvert improvements not included). Assessment rates per front foot for various zoning categories are shown on page 3 of the assessment calculations, attached, and range from $28.76 for commercial (front) to $9.20 for residential (rear). The total length of the project is about 8,000 linear feet or 16,000 front feet. Please note on the attached right-of-way sketch map which properties are subject to escrow payments and which are subject to assessment rate R~ments. We stand ready to proceed with field surveys, assessment roll preparation, right-of-way research and further detailed construction planning upon Council authorization. Meanwhile, please call if we can be of further service in this regard. ßI:w~i. RWA/ra Enclosures cc Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assist. Dir. of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3387 . ~. J(,~wtT~-·ENClI~-FlOWERS.I~.·- J-' ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE (" - . .._ -s-':':' _-~ . . . _HER: Ci t.y of North Ri ch 1 and Hi 11 S JOB NO. 3-007 DA TE: 5-24-84 ~~T DESCRIPTION: Chapman Drive Street and Drainage I~provements II DESCRIPTION OF ITEM ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT COST NO. QUANTITY PRICE bAVING IMPROVEMENTS: ~et Excavation 1 C.Y. 15,CTOU 0.00 $ 90,000 lme Stabilized Subgrade 2 s. Y. 29,000 1.50 43,40a Jle 3 TON 1,200 80.00 96,000 tt TIe Coa t 4 S. V. 24,000 0.30 7,200 ·"ë~k Coat 5 S.V. 47,000 0.10 4,700 \' e "All HMAC 211 Thick 6 -S.V. 47,000 ~.OO 141,000 ,\ e 11011 Hr·1AC 2" Thick 7 S.V. 24,000 3.10 74, ~~OO ,I e liD" HMAC Transitions 8 TON 050 3-rr. 00 19,500 II Curb and 2·411 Gutter 9 L.F. 13,200 5.50 72,600 IliIT-hi ck Concrete Va 11 eys 1-0 -S.Y. 270 30.0U 8,100 . pi nQ 11 L. F. 8,000 1.50 12,000 ~c iust WV Boxes 12 EACH 24 250.00 6,000 = "fst Manholes 13 EACH 35 300.00 10,500 ;t ~-TOTAL -------------____________________________ ------ ------ ----------- ------- -f 585,500 I ~ nRATN IM"'KlJVI:MI-NIS~ RU RC:P 14 L. F. 920 28.00 $ 25.760 ~ P 15 L.F. 1,200 50.00 60,000 P 16 L.F. 2tOOO 75.00 150,000 rQ II RCP 17 L. F. 230 90.00 20,700 51 . Inl et 18 EACH 2 2000.00 4,00-0 0 I In 1 et 19 . EACH 20 2500.00 50,000 : ~. Inlet 20 EACH 2 3000.00 .. 6,OGO IU þoftion Box 21 EACH 15 3500.0U t>l,~UO- ..... ,- D' x61 Box Cul vert {Rorgan Meadows} 22 r. s. r H~,UUU ~b,UUU ...., :e Dve ExistinQ Fox Hollow Box -Culvert 23 I. S. 1 6UUG.OO 6,000 ~ Q·xSI Box Culvert {Fox Hollow) 24 L.S. 1 .55,000 55,000 (TOTAL -------------------------________________ ------ ------ ----------- ------- .~ -s14 ,-900 -- - . . =- .. WED & APPROVED: SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST - --- $1,100~460 W, PLUS Engineering & ~ ~ Contingencies 199,540 OJECT MANAGER TOTAL'ESTIMATED COST $1,300,(' I' I I'CT : ~,o ,P DATE: 6-26-84 Century Oaks Addition Water Lines Ir ARTMENT: Utility, rCKGROUND: This is a water line which will run in Hightower Drive from Sm;r'hfiplc1 . . Road'west into the B'riarwood Estates. The size of the line is 24" q,Dd the . adjoining developer ,is paying for 8" of this 24". Bids were taken recentl and the total bid was $127,606.70. Of this amount the developer is paying $74,361.30 and the city's portion is $53,245.40. I recommend thåt you approve these bids and this project because it is I I II I I· "I CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: part of our water master pla~. Approve the bid of M-CO., INC., Hurst, TX in the amount of $127,606.70 with a comp1et~on t~me of 90 calendar days. 'UDGETED ITE.'i: YES X !\O ~CCOUNT NUMBER: 02-11-01-6700 It-----------------~-- 1ft I ... -- -- --- - -- - --- - ~ - -~- -- ~ ---~ --- - -. -.. ---- - ------. - ~ -~ - -. -. ....----- I· , Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I , I · Elliott & Hughes. Inc. Engineers/Planners , Mr. Gene Riddle Director of Public Works P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas Re: Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements To Serve CENTURY OAKS ADDITION City of North Richland ~;lls, Texas Dear Mr. Riddle: In accordance with your earlier insutructions, we have reviewed each of the sealed bids receiv_ed on June 19, 1984 for construction of the above captioned project. In addition, a line item IIBid Tabu1ationll has been prepared, anå a copy is attached to this correspondence for your review and file. As you will note on the IIBid Tabu1ationll and as provioed for in the Proposal Documents, a IIBase Bidll and an IIAlternate Bidll were sol icited for the project. The primary difference between the base and alternate bids pertains to the type of material used for the 24-inch water line. The Base Bid was for Reinforced Concrete Pressure Pipe, (Steel Cylinder); and the Alternate Bid provided for the use of Ductile Iron Pipe. It is our recorrmendation that award of a construction contract be for the IIBase Bid"; utilizing the Reinforced Concrete Pressure Pipe. The low bid for the water line improvements was submitted by M-Co, Inc. of Hurst, Texas and is in the net amount of $127,606.70. Completion time for the work was bid at 90 Calendar Days. Since the City of North Rich1and Hills previously ~greed to participate in the cost of the water 1 ine improvements in excess of an eight (8") inch main and appurtenances; we have prepared a separate tabulation which delineates the pro rata portion of the overall project that is the responsibility of the developer of Century Oaks. Based on the low base bid we compute the developer's share to be $74,361.30; with the City's part being $53,245.40. No participation is requested of the City for the cost of Sanitary Sewer Improvements which were included in the bid proposal. We trust the foregoing will be beneficial to you as you consider proceeding with thi s project. We respectfully invite you to contact us at your earliest convenienc~. shou11i- "you have questions or require additional information. Pas teur; Qu adrang 1 e Deve 1 oprnent Company Enclosures 1004 W. Eul... Blvd., .ul~. 103 . Eul..., T.x.. 7&039 · 817/2&7-1303 I- TABULATION FOR PRO RATA PORTION Ie FOR QUADRANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ... WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE I CENTURY OAKS ADDITION NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT/PRICE TOTAL I 1. N/A -0- -0- -0- 1A. N/A -0- -0- -0- I 2. 8" P.V.C., OR-I8 2715 L.F. 9.75 26,471.25 3. 6" P.V.C., -OR-I8 1820 L.F. 7.75 14,105.00 4. N/A -0- -0- -0- I 4A. N/A -0- -0- -o- s. 8" Gate Valve & Box 4 EACH 425.00 1,700.00 I 6. 611 Gate Valve & Box 8 EAC,H 295.00 2,360.00 7. Fire Hydrants 5 EACH 850.00 4,250.00 I B. Road Bore W/811 W.L. 40 L ..F . 36.00 1,440.00 9. Road Bore W/6" W.L. 40 L.F. 34.00 1,360.00 Ie 10. 16" x 811 Tapping Sleeve and 811 Gate Valve 1 EACH 1450.00 1,450.00 11. 16" x 6" Tapping Sleeve I and 6" Gate Valve 1 EACH 1450.00 1,450.00 12. 811 x 8" Tapping Sleeve and Valve 1 EACH 1100.00 1,100.00 I 13. I" x 3/4" Double W.S. 33 EACH 265.00 8,745.00 14. 3/4" Water Service 8 EACH 225.00 1,800.00 I 15. Cast Iron Fittings 2.3 TONS 1900.00 4,370.00 15A. N/A -0- -0- -0- I 16. N/A -0- -0- -0- 17. N/A -0- -0- -0- I 18. Extra Sand Embedment 100 C.Y. 3.00 300.00 19. Extra Gravel Embedemnt 30 C.Y. 5.00 150.00 20. Extra Concrete Encasement 10 C.Y. 45.00 450.00 I SUB-TOTAL AMOUNT BID $ 71,501.25 I INSPECTION AND PERMIT FEE (4%) 2,860.05 GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT BID FOR f' WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS· $ 74,361.30 I