The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1984-08-13 Agendas I) I I. I I I I I I I. I I I I I !I I I. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 13, 1984 - 6r30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Discussion of Various Tax Exemption Options Mrs. Lou Spiegel 2. Discussion of Street Sweeping Program Gene Riddle, Director Public Works/Utilities . ' I' i '!, '. (/'Jj _ (j ,'f \ () ~"" '. II... /,' II:' ., .~ .J l ¿- /;rt~. L.- .1'--<-'- ('-"-.. ¿'( ~ i { ~ .,., \,.-' - -----, . - -, ...- - Executive Session to Discuss Persònnel, Land and/or Litigation *3. 4. Discussion Other Items 11 3 )- '¿-~ " ___~: - ~""",-",,-.J . ",.i' /' -. r'~:" ,~"./ - /1:. ··1 ... - . , (~. :j .., { '., ~ *Closed due to Subject Matter as Provided by the Open Meeting Law Al ....( .- ~ 'f ' , " ),/ ..,-. . / . . '. ~ '---- (4," ._./ .It, : ~ l" ' I, I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 13, 1984 I 4Itr the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, II 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER /...~... ~ Call to Order ,,¡. ITEM ACTION TAKEN II II II II I I I I I I I I I I. I 2':~' -4: Roll Call ~,'" Invocation Consideration of Minutes of the Re ular Meetin~ July 23, 1984 Consideration of Removin Consent A~enda from the Consideration of Consent indicated b Asterisk 8 ~ 31, 32, 33, 34 & ~ ~/presentation of Proclamation by Mayor Echols *8. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-67, Request of Southland Financial Service for Replat of Blocks 46R, 48R, Lots lR thru 5R, Block 20, and Lots 1R thru 5R, Block 49, Foster Villa~e Addition (Located between Rufe Snow Drive and Meadowview Terrace, on the North side of North Park Drive and both sides of Cross Timber between North Park Drive and Parkwood) II, I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 13, 1984 14Itr the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I NUMBER/ I / I I I I ITEM PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL HEARING. PZ 84-22. Reauest of Bursev Joint Venture to Rezone Tract lA1 and a Portion of Tract 1A. Thomas SDrouce Survey. Abstract 1399. from AG (A2riculture to R-7-MF (Multi-Familv) (Located on the south side of Bursev Road. aODroximatelv 843 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive) ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-22 I ¡ ~ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING ~ APPEAL HEARING. PZ 84-45~ Reouest of JONCO I Development Company to Rezone Tract 3, J. C. McComas Survey. Abstract 1040. from lAG (Aariculture) to R-5-D (DuDlex) (Located on the west side of Smithfield Road, I bounded on the west bv Hewitt Street. and aooroximatelv 550 feet north of Chaoman Road) I ) I tv I . vJ~ I I I. I Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-45 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-44. Reauest of John Cook to Rezone Tracts 4A. & 4D. J. D. McComas Survey. Abstract 1040. from AG (A2riculture) to R-3 (Sin2le Familv) (Located on the north side of·ChaDman Road. bounded on the west bv McComas Addition. and a Dortion bounded on the east by Hewitt Street) I. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AOENJA AUGUST 13, 1984 114Itr the Meeting conducted at the North Richlani Hills City Hall Council Chambers, II 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I I II I I ~ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING I ' Ie I I I I I I Ie I ..... . ITEM Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-44 ACTION TAKEN PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-42, Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ for a change in the Multi-Family Planned Development Zoning in Ordinance 111033 Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-42 PZ 84-54, Request of Bill Marcom to Rezone Tract 4R1, A. G Walker Survey, Abstract 1630, from R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located on the east side of Flory Street, approximately 450 feet North of Harmonson Road) ....~.,... Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-54 /' ~ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-55, Request of Burk Collins Investments Incorporated to Rezone Blocks 1 & 2, Fex Hollow Addition from R-3 (Single Family) to R-5-J (Duplex) (Located north of Watauga Road, bounded on the south by the railroad and on the west by North Park Estates) Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-55 I. II CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 13, 1984 114Itr the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I I ~ NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Amendment to Ordinance #1080 Ordinance ~- Progress Report on Kin2weeã Estates. Mr. Charles Evans, Attorney, Hurst, Texas I I Consideration of Grantin on PZ 84-52, Dovne S. Byrd eal Hearin ({-IDe{ Lf I I. I I ,. () "\ f'~' I I I I I. I Consideration of Re uest of T. J. Hubbard 6820 Meadow Road, for a Variance from the Brick Ordinance ~~ ~ Consideration of Request of Arlene Stoermer, 6417 Diamond Loch, for a Variance from the Brick Ordinance Consideration of Re uest of Ra E. Porter 4830 Blaney, for a Variance from the Brick Ordinance *27. Consideration of Transfer of General Funds to Capital Pro;ects Fund Consideration of Ordinance Chan in the evine *29. Consideration of Ordinance Amending Ordinance #971 (Civil Preparedness) I. I I~or the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 13, 1984 ITEM ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Participation with the City of Hurst on Improvements to Precinct Line Road ¿; Ô·-v----<J!.-f4'() \ Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #1 and Final to Asa Hunt, Incorporated, in the amount of $14,752-Watauga Drive Pump Station ~-- ~. Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #8, to Steele-Freeman, Incorporated in the amount of $242,744.83-Northfield and Norich Park Improvements * µ-;/ .,. "!x:/ ~. £' Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #3, and Final, to MICA Corporation in the amount of $19,875.89 Signalization on Rufe Snow Drive Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #11, to Vinson Construction in the amount of $50,179.95-Walker's Branch Drainage Improvements Consideration of Appointments to Various Board and Commissions Presentation of Proposed 1984-85 Operating Budget for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and Setting the Public Hearing I. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 13, 1984 I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I 14Itr the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, I 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM 37. Citizen Presentation Mr. Earl Re~ion 7200 Ever2reen North Richland Hills Re: Draina~e Problem ACTION TAKEN 38. Ad;ournment I II Ie 10: Irom: August 1, 1984 Rodger N. Line City Manager )1~ ftl/ Lou Spiegel Director of Finance lIubject: Tax Rates Attached are calculated effective tax rates tables: I I I I Ie 1) Tax Rate with no exemption change 2) Tax Rate with $15,000 over-65 exemption 3) Tax Rate with $15,000 over-65 and 10% residence homestead 4) Tax Rate with $15,000 over-65 and 20% residence homestead 5) Tax Bill Effect at Effective Tax Rate 6) Tax Bill Effect at Maximum Effective Tax Rate 7) Effect of Rates on Budget In Table 1 - no exemption change - the calculated tax rate would drop to .3328/$100 assessed valuation. This change from the .4095/$100 that we used at work session due to IIhe new figures that we received on July 26 from TAD which had higher increases in assessed values ,on 1983 properties than previously reported to us, to the extent of approximately 11200,000,000. In Table 2 - over-65 Ex.emption $15,000 - the tax rate would be .3329/$100. II In Table 3 - over-65 $15,000'+ 10% Residence Homestead - the calculated Tax Rate ould be .3432/$100 and this will not cover the amount needed for the budget. We will lie approximately $104,837 short. The reason for this is that in the year that you IIrant a new exemption, State law requires that you must reduce the amount of tax revenue raised in the prior year associated with this exemption. To figure this we used 1983 lingle family appraised value $411,067,182 X 10% = $41,106,718 X .28/$100 (M&O Rate 1983) = $115,098 revenue lost due to new exemption. To arrive at amount of exemptions lIor 1984 I took the Total Appraised Value X 62% X 10% to arrive at Taxable Value for calculations. (The 1984 Tax roll is estimated by TAD to be comprised 62% of single lIaiY I residences.) I figured the revenue lost for the over-65 change also. All of I I lI~evenue lost due to new exemptions is the number in DATA ITEM #6. To come close to the amount required for the budget, (within $7,269) you need to set the rate at the lfaximum Effective Tax Rate (3% limit without Public Hearing) which is .3534/$100. In Table 4 - over-65 $15,000 + 20% Residence Homestead - the tax rate would leo .3558/$100 and this will be approximately $215,375 short of budget. This is due same reason as explained in Table 3 and we used the same method except we used ílO% instead of 10% in the calculations. Compare the effect to DATA ITEM 6 of the ~emptions to revenue. To give 20% Residence Homestead exemption you would need to raise the tax rate approximately 6.5% above the effective tax rate, thereby forcing II public hearing on the tax rate, which would have to be advertised in the City's official newspaper in a one quarter page ad as a tax rate increase. II In Table 5 and Table 6 - I have summarized the effect of each of the methods of exemptions on the tax bills at the Effective Tax Rate and the Maximum Effective ~x Rate. Table 7 will show the effect of each tax rate on the Tax Levy and the ~fect on the budget. II The 11·1) 2) 3) exemptions are deducted in the following order: Percentage Residence Homestead Over-65 Disabled Veterans II If you do decide to give the Residence Homestead exemption, the citizens that have filed with TAD for homestead for County or School district would also qualify for the Ifty exemption. Per State law a citizen can file for a homestead exemption up to one year after the delinquency date for that tax year and the refund is retroactive. (For Ifample 1984 tax year, a citizen could file an application up to January 31, 1986 and Ipeceive a refund for taxes paid on this exemption amount.) l When the tape for this year is received from TAD the programmer can run different tail information for each of the different methods for exemptions to determine the __ctual effect on the tax rate. The tape may be received by August 10th. Then you lÞuld have more actual information on which to base the calculation of the tax rate. The information contained in this report does contain several assumptions which could Irfect the tax rate up or down. I have discussed this with the programmer and he said that the needed information is in the tape and he could pull the information together II. I II I I. a relatively short length of time. If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact I me. I Sincerely. I ({(-(~ ~L'f£' Lou Spiegel I I I I I- I I I I I I I. I I, I ".... - - .. I . Ie Cltr or Specl. r District : I NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE·AND I PUBLICATION OF ESTIMATED UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCES ~ . . ... -<II ... _~.... ..<tÞ~ TABLE 1 NO EXEMPTION CHANGE '4' j~--=~~;..:...._-;....þ~\" _:..iw....~.......'-......""_....béI.....__.;.-..__.' . ~'.__~'......:..... . .'t . __ ._ .~.... .. ....,......... ~"# (n-meJ I. fnome~ . fUtJe/r!os'jfion' for fiurisdicUon' . in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04, Property Tax Code. have calculated the tax rate which may not be Ixceeded by more than three percent bY, the governing body of the (jurisdictionl without holding a public earing as required by the code. That rate is as follows: . per'100 of value. . The estimated unencumbered fund balance for Maintenance a Operation fund: . . The timated unencumbered fund balance for Interest a Sinking fund: S I CALCULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE I. eA. t· 1983 Total tax IeVY'from the 1983 tax roll ....................................... 2. 1983 Tax rate ($ ...:1!L M&O and $ ..:.B..I&S) . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . .. totel .. 1983 Debt servIce ('&S) 'evy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 1983 MaIntenance & Operation (M&O) ......................................... ,j. 1983 M&O taxes on property In terrItory that has ceased to be a part of unIt In 1984 ... Is· 1983 M&O taxes on property becomIng exempt In 1884 ......................... 7. 1983 M&O taxes on taxable value lost because property I. appraIsed at less than market I val~e In 1984 ................................................................ · 1984 Total taxable value of alf property . . . .... .. . . . . .. . . . . .... . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . .. rI· 1984 Taxable value of new Improvements added .'nce Jan. 1. 1983 .............. I· 1984 Taxable value of property annexed since Jan. 1. 1983 ...................... 11. 1984 Tax levy needed to aatisty debt aervice (I&S) . .. .. .... .. ...... .. . .......... I· Rate to ral.e 1983 tax due levy to appraIsal roll errora (lost dollars divided by 1984 I taxable value) ($ + . )( 100) ........... I Rate to regain taxes lost In 1983 due to appraIsal rolf errors (lost dollars divided by 1984 taxable values)($ + $ )( 100) ..... 4. 1983 M&O Taxes used to regain lost 1982 levy .................................. I. I $ s , $ S S $ , , 3,448,582 · 50 /$100 1,517,376 1,931,206 . 4,659 , 1,896 $1,053,073,981 $ 46.436.167 $ $ 1,492,496 -/$100 -/S1oo . I I I. ---........~ ~.. .. ....-.-. -~ ..~- .'-:.~- IALCULA TION TENANCEAND OPERATION (M&O) TAX RATE I> 1983 T ota I tax levy (Da ta 1> ...........-.................... : · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ) Subtract 1883 Debt aervlce levy (Data 3) ...................................... (C) Subtract 1883 Taxes on property no longer In unit (Data 5) ..................... I Subtract 1 983 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) ................................... Subtract 1983 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) ......................... I) Subtract 1983 Taxes used to regain lost 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... ) Adjusted 1983 M&O levy ...... '. . . . . . . . . · . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I> 1984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) .. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. ) Subtract 1984 VI!'ue of new Improvements (Data 9) ............................ (C) Subtract 1884 Value of annexed property (Data 10) ............................ I> Adjusted 1884 Taxable value for M&O ........................................ ) Divide the Adjusted 1983 M&O le~ (1-G above) by the Adjusted 1984 taxable valueforM&O(2-Dabove).($ 1,924,651 +, 1,006,637,814 ).. I> Multi ply by $1 00 val uation ................................................... I (c.ctive M&O rate for 1984 ................................................. IREST AND SINKING (I&S> TAX RATE , (A) 1884 I&S levy needed to Ntisfy debt (Data 1 1) ................................. .> 1984 Total taxable value of an property (Data 8) ............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Divide the 1984 I&S le~ (4-A above> b~ the 1984 Total taxable value . (4 - B above) ($ 1 , 492 , 4 6 +, 1. 53. ° 73 . 981 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . t> Multiply by $100 valuation ......................................,............. (E) Effective I&S rate for 1884 ................................................... ] $ -$ -$ -, -, -S $ $ -$ -, S 3,448,582 1,517.376 4,659 1,896 1,924,651 1,053,073,981 46,436,167 1,006,637,814 $ . 001911 )( $100 $ .1911 IS100 S 1,492,496 S 1,053,073,981 s · 00141 7 )( $100 $ .1417 15100 IRAISAL ROLL ERROR RATE ,,> Rate to raise 1983 levy due to appraisal errors (Data 12) ....................... .) Add rate to regain taxes lost due to errors (Data 13) ........................... + $ ,lib) Total Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors .................................... $ I . I : £LE:::~T::oT:e R:: :::e;·~.~........................................... . .1911 1$100 II> Add Effective I&S rate (4- E above> . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. + $ · 141 7 1$100 ~) Add Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors (5-C above) ......................... + $ 1$100 ..1984 Effective Tax Rate ................................................... .3.% $ · 3328 15100 o .uu~~ 1984 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE .................................... .3427 1884 Effective rax Rate Is the tax ,ate published as required by Sec. 26.04, Property rax Code. I s 15100 IS100 15100 I ·1,· ~.". .~ .' ., -.. -~... ..~...".. ....-"-"....:.........--:-......--... .-. ,. ~ ........~---~__.__. ,__"'-.....~_.. ,'. ~~_I:~._ ~.......__ 14IÞ $15,000 OVER-65 EXEMPTION y or Specl.1 D'.lrlct: InameJ I NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND IUBLICATION OF ESTIMATED UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCES .....-... ... (namel , (title/r>,os'iHonJ for fjurisdicHonl . n accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04. Property Tax Code, have calculated the tax rate which may not be leded by more than three percent by the ¡overnin¡ body of the OurisdjctionJ without holdin¡ a public in¡ as required by the code. That rate Is as foHows: . per'100 of value. he estimated unencumbered fund balance for Maintenance a Operation fund: . . The [ated unencumbered fund balance for Interest a Sfnkln¡ fund: S me Titlel osition ' I CALCULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE D~ . . 11983 Total tax levy from the 1983 tax roll ....................................... 2. 1983 Tax rate (S ~ M&O and $ .:E.-I&S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J 1983 Debt aervice (I&S) levy · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · 1883 Maintenance & Operation (MAO) ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. 1883 MaO taxes on property in territory that has ceased to be 8 part of unit In 1984 ... .1983 M&O taxes on property becoming exempt In 1984 ......................... 7. 1883 MAO taxes on taxable varue 108t because property I. appraised .t less than market 'JYaf~e In 1884 ................................................................ · 1984 Total taxable value of .n property . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -'1984 Taxable value of new Improvements added Ilnce Jan. 1, 1883 .............. ,.1984 Taxable value of property annexed .Ince Jan. 1, 1883 ...................... 11. 1984 Tax levy needed to aatisty debt .ervlce (I&S) .............................. l6.te to raIse 1983 tax due levy to appralaal roll error. (lost dollara dIvided by 1984 lllaxable value) (S + . )( 100) ........... 3þte to regain taxes lost In 1883 due to appralsel roll error. (lost donars divided by .984 taxable values)($ + S )( 100) ..... 4. 1983 MAO Taxes uled to regain lost 1882 levy .................................. I. I $ S S $ S $ 3,448,582 · 50 1$100 1,517,376 1,931,206 . 10,296 $ 1,896 $1,051,060,491 S 46,436,167 $ S 1,492,496 s - 1$100 $ S - 1$100 I I I. -,~--.-... .. . ..' . . . . . ~ .'-....-.-. -----........-. ......- "--"~- I CALCULATION AINTENANCE AND OPERATION (M&O) TAX RATE I (A) 1983 T ota I tax levy (Da ta 1) .......... .. · · . · · · . · . · . · · · · · · · · .: · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · (8) Subtråct 1983 Debt aervlce levy (Data 3) ...................................... (0) Subtract 1983 Taxes on property no longer In unit (Data 5) ..................... I (D) Subtract 1983 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) ...........................:...... , _ . (E) Subtract 1983 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) .... .-'.- ... . . · . . . . . . . . . . · . . . I (F) Subtract 1983 Taxes used to regain lost 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... (G) Adjusted 1983 M&O levy .................................................... I (A) 1884 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) .. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. (B) Subtract 1984 VI!'ue of new Improvements (Data 9) ................... . . . . . . . . . (C) Subtract 1984 Value of "annexed property (Data 10) ............................ I (D) Adjusted 1984 Taxable value for M&O ........................................ 3. (A) Divide the Adjusted 1883 M&O levy (1-G above) by the Adjusted 1884 taxable I valueforM&O(2-Dabove).($ 1.919.014 + S 1.004.624.324 ).. ~ Multiply by $100 valuation ................................................... Ir~:;c~~: :::K:t: :::~~AX· ~~~~........................................... ~. (A) 1984 I&S levy needed to I8tisfy. debt (Data 11) ................................. I (8) 1984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... (C) Divide the 1984 f&S few 6 (4-A above) by the 1984 Total taxable value . (4 - B above) ($ 1 J 492 , 49 + S 1 !I 0 51 !I 060 !I 491 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . I (D) Multiply by $100 valuation ................................................... ] 3,448,582 1,517,376 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -S $ 1,919,014 $1,051,060,491 46,436,167 -$ -S S 1 ,004, 624 , 324 10,296 1,896 $ .001910 )( $100 S . 1910/S1oo $ 1.492.496 $1,051,060,491 s · 001419 )C $100 (E) Effective I&S rate for 1884 ................................................... s · 1419/S1oo IpPRAISAL ROU ERROR RATE 5. (A) Rate to raise 1983 levy due to appraisal errors (Data 12) ....................... S IS100 I (8) Add rate to regain taxes lost due to errors (Data 13) ........ ........... ......... + 1 - /1100 (0) Total Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors .................................... S - IS100 ~~LE::::~T~~oT~eR~~~~:e:·~.~........................................... 1 .1910/$100 I (8) Add Effective 1&8 rate (4-E above) . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . · . .. + 1 · 141 9/1100 (C) Add Rate to .djult for appraisal roll errors (5-C above) ......................... + $ - 1$100 -.> 1984 Effective Tax Rate ..................................................... $ · 332 9/S1oo 3% .0099 . 1984 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE ..................................... . 3428 7884 Effective Tax Rate Is 'he 'ax r.te published as required by Sec. 26.04, Property rax Code. I I· I. -...,.." · Ie 10% RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION 15,000 OVER - 65 EXEMPTION Tl\BLE 3 .-....... ..~.... .., .~- ..... ..'4..I""-":"~-.::IJ..~_,,-...~þ......~, --'~~"'~""~"'-"""-.__"''; ~__'"'''''':'_''''.''' .....~ __ 04......_ ... ,"",'~ ~._ ICIty or Special ~'''rlct : In-me) NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND 1 PUBLICATION OF ESTIMATED UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCES _. (nomel , (tHle/pos'Hion) for liurisdiction1 , in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04, Property Tax Code, have calculated the tax rate which may not be Ixceeded by more than three percent by the governing body of the (jurisdiction' without hoJding a public earing as required by the code. That rate is 8S foUowa: . per $100 of value. The estimated unencumbered fund balance for Maintenance a Operation fund: . . The IStimatedunencumbered fund balance for Interest a Sinking fund: $ (NomeJ. fTjtle/DositionJ Ivoter I CALCULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE * ~:8~ Total tax levy from the 1983 tax roll ....................................... 2. 1983 Tax rate ($ ~ M&O and $ -=.3!.,&S) .................................. 13. 1983 Debt lervice (I&S) levy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. 1983 MaIntenance & Operation (M&O) ......................................... I S. 1983 M&O taxes on property In territory that has ceased to be a part, of unit In 1984 ... 6. 1983 M&O taxes on property becoming exempt In 1984 ......................... 7. 1983 M&O taxes on taxable va'ue lost because property II appra/eed at less than market I I val ~e In 1984 ................................................................ 8. 1984 Total taxable va'ue of all property . . . . .. . .. .. ... . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. 19. 1984 Taxable value of new Improvements added Ilnce Jan. 1, 1983 .............. I O. 1984 Taxable value of property annexed Ilnce Jan. 1. 1983 ...................... 11. 1984 Tax levy needed to aatisfy debt lervlce (I&S) . .. .. .. .. .... .... .... ......... 12. Rate to rall8 1983 tax due levy to appra/eal roll errorl ('ost dolla,. divided by 1984 taxable value) ($ + , )( 100) ........... f· Rate to regain taxes lost In 1983 due to appraleal roll errors ('ost dollars divided by 1984 taxable va'ues)($ + $ )( 100} ..... 14. 1983 M&O Taxes uled to regain lost 1982 levy .................................. Ie I $ 3,448,582 $ .50 1$100 $ 1,517,376 $ 1,931,206 , . $ 125,395 , 1,896 $ 986,123,969 $ 46,436,167 , S 1,492,496 $ - IS100 $ - IS100 , , I I Ie :=----. '..~~.:~--,-'. ..~- I~ALCULA TION IINTENANCE 'AND OPERATION (M&O) TAX RATE ..) 1 983 Total tax levy (Data 1) .......... '.' . . . . . . . · . · · · · · . . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .> Subtract 1983 Debt eervlce levy (Data 3) ...................................... ,1C) Subtract 1983 Taxes on property no longer In unIt (Data 5) ..................... F) Subtract 1983 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) .................................. (E) Subtract 1983 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) ......................... r) Subtract 1983 Taxes used to regaIn lost 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... -ro> Adjusted 1983 M&O levy .................................................... ~) 1884 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... Ie> Subtract 1 984 V~Iue of new Improvements (Data 9) ....... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · (C) Subtract 1884 Value of annexed property (Data 10) ............................ ID) Adjusted 19&4 Taxable value for MIO ........................................ . (A) Divide the Adjusted 1883 M&O levy (1-G above) by the Adjusted 1884 taxable valueforM&O(2-Dabove).($ 1.803.915 + $ 939,687.802 ).. Ie) Multiply by $100 valuation ................................................... ,i!;C=~::~~K:t: ::::~AX· ~~~~........................................... 4. (A) 1884 I&S levy needed to aatisfy debt (Data 11) ................................. a8) 1984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... ~C) Divide the 1984 I&S 1m (4-A above) by the 1984 Total taxable value . (4 -B above) ($ 1 , 492, 9 Ó +, 986 . 123 . 969 ) ............. . ID) Multiply by $100 valuation ................................................... (E) Effective I&S rate for 1884 ................................................... I . ~ $ 3,448,582 -$ 1,517,376 -$ -S 125,395 -$ 1,896 -$ $ 1,803,915 $ 986.123.969 -$ 46,436,167 -$ $ 939,687,802 $ .001919 )( $100 $ .1919/5100 $ 1,492,496 S 986,123,969 $ . 001513 )( $100 $ .1513/5100 tPRAISAL ROLL ERROR RATE 5. (A) Rate to raise 1883 levy due to appraisal errors (Data 12) ....................... S - /$100 P) Add rate to regain taxes lost due to errors (Data 13) ........ ..... ...... .... ..... + $ - 1$100 (C) Total Rate to adjust for appral8al roll errore .................................... S - /S1oo I:LE:::~T::oT:e~: :b::e:'~.4............................................ $ .1919 11100 1(8) Add Effectivel&S rate (4-E above) ........................................... + $ .1513/5100 (C) Add Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors (S-C above) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + S - IS100 -.(D) 1884 Effective Tax Rate ................................................... ,,~ S · 3432 /$100 .)0 .UIUl 1984 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE .................................... ' · j~j4 , '884 Effective T.x Rate Is the tax rate published as required by Sec. 26.04, Property Tax Code. I I· -I- '. . ..., ... .'''. . Ie CIty or Specie r DJ.trlcl: I I I, -;:r. , ".. , 4 .. '.-.' ....,,,... ....~ ."'..;. .....;.~"\_:I'\.~......._~.......~'...~~4ÎL-...""'~.,\O..............-..__.. ........__~___#:_... .¡AJ}t..~_ _......~~ 20% RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION 15,000 OVER-65 EX~MPTION In-me) NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND PUBLICATION OF ESTIMATED UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCES (nome] , lritle/pos'irionJ for (jurisdictionJ , in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04, Property Tax Code, have calculated the tax rate which may not be Ixceeded by more than three percent by the governing body of the (iurisdictionl without holding a public earing as required by the code. That rate is as follow.: S per $100 of value. . The esUmated unencumbered fund balance for Maintenance A Operation fund: S sUmaled unencumbered fund balance for Intere.t A Sinking fund: S IDotel I CALCULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE l·eTA 1'. 1983 Total tax levy from the 1983 tax roll ....................................... 2. 1983 Tax rate ($ _ M&O and $ _I&S) . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. ... ... .. . . . . . . . . . .. 13. 1983 Debt service (I&S) levy .. . . . .. . . .. .... . . . . ..-.. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . 4. 1983 MaIntenance & Operation (M&O) ......................................... 5. 1983 M&O taxes on property In territory that has ceased to be a part of unIt In 1984 ... Ie. 1983 M&O taxes on property becomIng exempt In 1884 ......................... 7. 1983 M&O taxes on taxable yalue lost because property I. appraIsed at less than market I Yal~e In 1984 ................................................................ 8. 1984 Total taxable value of all property .. . . .'. . . . . . .... . . .. . . . . .... .. .... . . ..... 19. 1984 Taxable yalue of new Improvements added alnce Jan. " 1883 .............. O. 1984 Taxable yalue of property annexed alnce Jan. " 1983 ...................... I 11. 1984 Tax levy needed to aatisly debt aervlce (I&S) .. . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . . I t. Rate to raIse 1983 tax due levy to appraIsal roll error. (loat dollar. divided by 1984 taxable Yalue) ($ + . )( 100) ........... I· Rate to regain taxes lost In 1983 due to appraIsal roll errors (lost dollars dIvided by 1984 taxable values)($ + $ )( 100) ..... 14. 1983 M&O Taxes u.ed to regain lost 1982 levy .................................. Ie I $ 3,448~582 S · 50 IS100 S 1~517.376 , 1,931,206 S S - . 240,494 1,896 , $919,173,956 $ 46.436.167 , , 1,492,496 s - IS100 $ - IS100 , ....-..... ... . The . I I ...:- ~...... Ie ....~....-.-... . . .. .. ...-...-....~... ~--...-.--- .~ - -IALCULA TION TENANCE AND OPERATION (M&O) TAX RATE I) 1983 T ota I tax levy (Data 1) .......... '.- · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · : · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ) Subtract 1983 Debt aervlce levy (Data 3) ...................................... (C) Subtract 1883 Taxes on property no longer In unit (Data 5) ..................... I) Subtract 1983 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) .................................. I> Subtract 1983 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) ......................... I) Subtract 1983 Taxes used to regain lost 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... ) Adjusted 1983 M&O levy .................................................... .,) 1884 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ) Subtract 1884 VI!'ue of new Improvements (Data 9) ............................ (C) Subtract 1884 Varue of annexed property (Data 10) ............................ 11» Adjusted 19M T aX8ble val ue for M & 0 ........................................ .~) Divide the Adjusted 1983 M&O levy (1-G above) by the Adjusted 1984 taxable valueforM&O(2-Dabove).($ 1.688.816 + $ 872.737.789 ).. I) Multiply by $100 valuation ................................................... (.ective M&O rate for 1984 ................................................. REST AND SINKING (1&5) TAX RATE ) 1884 I&S levy needed to aatisfy debt (Data 1 1) ................................. .) 1984 Total taxable value of an property (Data 8) .... '.......... .. .. .. .. .. . ...... ~) Divide the 1884 I&S levy (4-A above) by the 1884 Total taxable value . (4-Sabove) ($ 1,492,496 + $ 91-g,173,956 ) .............. t) Multiply by $100 valuation .................................................... (E) Effective I&S rate for 1884 ................................................... S -$ -$ -S -$ -S $ $ -$ -$ $ ] 3,448,582 1,517,376 240,494 1,896 1,688,816 919,173,956 46,436,167 872,737,789 S .001935 )( $100 S .1935 /$100 $ 1,492,496 $ 919,173,956 $ .001623 )( $100 , .1623 15100 .RAISAL ROLL ERROR RATE Þ.") Rate to raise 1983 levy due to appraisal errors (Data 12) .. . ... . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .... -1$100 f3) Add rate to regain taxes lost due to errors (Data 13) ........................... + , -/S1oo ~) Total Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errol'l ..................................... -'$100 :rLE:::V~::oT:e~: :b::e;·~.~........................................... . .1935 1$100 Jf> Add Effective I&S rate (4-E above) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . .. + . · 1623 If100 1:) Add Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors (5-C above) ......................... + . -1$100 Ie> 1884 Effective Tax Rate ..................................................... $ · 3558 /S1oo 3% .UIUó aximum 1984 Effective Tax Rate ............................... .3664 18S4 Effective Tax Rate Is 'he '.x r.te published as required by Sec. 26.04, Property Tax Code. I I- I Ie I OF SIDENCE 41000 50,000 61 000 70,000 81000 9~ 000 01 000 I ~e 51 000 I I I I Ie I TABLE 5 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1984-85 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE .3328/$100 .3432/$100 .3558/$100 TAX BILL WITH TAX BILL WITH TAX BILL WITH NO EXEMPTION 10% RESIDENCE SAVINGS 20% RESIDENCE SAVINGS CHANGE EXEMPTION EXEMPTION $133.12 $123.55 $ 9.57 $113.86 $19.26 166.40 154.44 11.96 142.32 24.08 199.68 185.33 14.35 170.78 28.90 232.96 216.22 16.74 199.25 33.71 266.24 247.10 19.14 227.71 38.53 299.52 277.99 21.53 256.18 43.34 332.80 308.88 23.92 284.64 48.16 OVER - 65 TAX BILL WITH EXEMPTIONS STATED ABOVE, PLUS INCREASE IN SENIOR CITIZENS EXEMPTION TO $15,000 $ 90.75 $ 72.07 $18.68 $ 60.49 $30.26 124.03 102.96 21.07 88.95 35.08 157.31 133.85 23.46 117.41 39.90 190.59 164.74 25.85 145.88 44.71 223.87 195.62 28.25 174.34 49.53 257.15 226.51 30.64 202.81 54.34 290.43 257.40 33.03 231.27 59.16 I' I Ie I IE OF ESIDENCE 10 , 000 50,000 10,000 70,000 10 , 000 'eo ,000 r'OOO Ie I 10,000 0,000 liO , 000 10,000 80,000 I 10,000 100,000 I I I Ie I TABLE 6 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1984-85 MAXIMUM CALCULATED EFFECTIVE TAX RATE .3328/$100 .3534/$100 .3664/$100 TAX BILL WITH TAX BILL WITH TAX BILL WITH NO 10% EXEMPTION 20% EXEMPTION EXEMPTION 3% MAXIMUM SAVINGS 3% MAXIMUM SAVINGS CHANGE INCREASE INCLUDED INCREASE INCLUDED $133.12 $127.22 $ 5.90 $117.25 $15.87 166.40 159.03 7.37 146.56 19.84 199.68 190.84 8.84 175.87 23.81 232.96 222.64 10.32 205.18 27.78 266.24 254.45 11.79 234.50 31.74 299.52 286.25 13.27 263.81 35.71 332.80 318.06 14.74 293.12 39.68 OVER - 65 TAX BILL WITH EXEMPTIONS STATED ABOVE, PLUS INCREASE IN SENIOR CITIZENS EXEMPTIONS $15,000 $ 90.75 $ 74.21 16.54 $ 62.29 $28.46 124.03 106.02 18.01 91.60 32.43 157.31 137.83 19.48 120.91 36.40 190.59 169.63 20.96 150.22 40.37 223.87 201.44 22.43 179.54 44.33 257.15 233.24 23.91 208.85 48.30 290.43 265.05 25.38 238.16 52.27 I I Ie I I TABLE 7 TAX RATE & EFFECT ON BUDGET OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE NO EXEMPTION CHANGE $15,000 OVER-65 'M & 0 RATE . & S RATE lAX RATE .1911 .1910 .1417' .1419 .3328 .3329 3,504,630 3,498,980 97% 97% 3,399,491 3,394,010 1,492,496 1,492,496 1,906,995 1,901,514 1,895,186 1,895,186 1,906,995 1,901,514 11,809 6,328 [LEVY GET :DEBT fNERAL FUND PROPOSED BUDGET .FFECTIVE IFER{UNDER) BUDGET I. I $15,000 OVER-65 & 10% RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD $15,000 OVER-65 & 20% RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD .1919 .1513 .3432 .1935 .1623 .3558 3,384,377 97% 3,282,845 1,492,496 1,790,349 3,270,420 97% 3,172,307 1,492,496' 1,679,811 1,895,186 1,790,349 (104,837) 1,895,186 1,679,811 (215,375) TAX RATE & EFFECT ON BUDGET OF MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE TAX RATE , & 0 RATE .2010 .2009 .2021 .2041 & S RATE .1417 .1419 .1513 .1623 lAX RATE .3427 .3428 .3534 .3664 AX LEVY 3,608,884 3,603,035 3,484,962 3,367,853 97% 97% 97% 97% IUDGET 3,500,617 3,494,943 3,380,413 3,266,817 EBT SERVICE 1,492,496 1,492,496 1,492,496 1,492,496 GENERAL FUND 2,008,121 2,002,447 1,887,917 1,774,321 ~POSED BUDGET 1,895,186 1,895,186 1,895,186 1,895,186 !MUM EFFECTIVE 2,008,121 2,002,447 1,887.917 1,774,321 OVER(UNDER) BUDGET 112,935 107,261 (7,269) (120,865) I 1ç EFFECT ON TAX RATE 105,307 105,106 98,612 91,917 I Ie I .. , ... ~ -wu r .............-...... ..., . ............ .. .. Ian J "" " ,1 . I ")... ~i ,I. ,., Special D18Irtct: (nameJ .... '. I NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE ,AND PUBLICATION OF ESTIMATED UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCES ~. (nome) , (title/position) for (jurisdiction) , _: ·n accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04. Property Tax Code, have calculated tlie tax rate which may not be xceeded by more than three percent by the governing body of the [jurisdictionJ without holding a public , earing as required, by the code. That rate is as'follows: S per $100 of value. ' · ,lhe estimated unencumbered fund balance for Maintenance I: Operation fund: $ Istimated unencumbFred fund balance for Interest I: Sinking fund: $ 1 , 724, 782 (Nome). fTitle/Dosition) . , . IDote) 2,907,373 . The '=- I CALCULATIONS tI~ED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE J -.ATA ,,~ ~ '. , 1883 Total tax levy from the 1983 tax roll ........................................ 1983 Tax rate ($ .1.L M&O and $ -4L I&S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. ~, . . . ~ I 3. 1983 Debt service (I&S) le';;/~ .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . .' ' 4. 1983 Maintenance & Operation (M&O) ...... ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 5. 1983 M&O taxes on property In territo.ry that has ceased to be a part of unit In 1~ ' .. . . 6. 1883 M&O taxes on property becoming exempt In 1884 .................. .'. .. ... 7. "883 M&O taxes on taxable value lost because property Is appraised at less than market I ' ' val ue In 1984 ................................................................ 8. 1984 Total taxable value of all property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 9. 1984 Taxable value of new Improvements added since Jan. 1, 1983 . . .. . .. . . . ~ ... 10. 1984 Taxable value of property annexed since Jan. 1, 1983 ...................... 111. 1984 Tax levy needed to satisfy debt serVice (I&S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . 12. Rate to raise 1983 tax due levy to appraisal roll errors (Ioat dollars divided by 1984 taxable val ue) (S + S )( 100) ........... 13. Rate to regain taxes lost In 1983 due to appraisal roll errors (lost dollars divided by. 1984 taxable valu8s)(S + S )( 100) ..... 14. 1983 M&O Taxes used to regain lost 1982 levy .................................. I . I ~ )I;;(,,~. - $ 3.448.582 .$ .50 IS100 S 1~517.376 $ 1..·931..206 S ---- $ 991' $ 6.858 . $852..858..727 T- ~ $ ~?fl\~R.??¿ $ $ 1,492.496 $ 1$100 $ S IS100 <f C;,,) ~) 3// {)c{? t t: e I I . - ~ -............._NL '. . ~~,......,.:-, II A. ~."~"I..r .... ~" ... ~""',... ,.,' .', "' .. .".... '. ," . - . . . . ),. ~' ,.. .IIlliALCULATION "'TENANCE AND OPERATION (M&O) TAX RATE 1. (A) 1983 Total tax levy (Data 1) .................................................. I (B) Subtract 1983 Debt service levy (Data 3)' .... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. · · · · · · .. .. · · · · · ,(C) Subtract 1983 Taxes on property no longer In unit (Data 5) ..................... I (D) Subtract 1883 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) .................'................. (E) Subtract 1983 Taxes for' productivity valuation (Data 7) ..........:.............., (F) Subtract 1983 Taxes used to regain lost 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... I (G) Adjusted 1983 M&O levy .................................................... 2. (A) 1984 Total taxable val ue of all property (Data 8) ... . . . . . . . · · . . . . · . . . · . · · · · · · · · · I (B) Subtract 1984 }Value of new Improvements (Data 9) ............................ (C) Subtract 1984 Value of annexed property (Data 10) ................ ~ . · · · · · . . · . · t· , ' . (D) Adjusted 1984 Taxable value for M&O ...,..................................... þ. (A) Divide the Adjusted 1883 M&O levy (1-G above) by the Adjusted 1984 taxable value for M&O (2-D above) ($ 1.923.357 + $ 820..220,c;O~ ).. I (B) Multiply by $100 valuation ................................................... (C) Effective M&O rate for 1984 ................................................. ~EREST AND SINKING (I&S) TAX RATE WA) 1984 I&S levy needed to satisfy debt (Data 11) ............................... '. · I (B) 1884 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... (C) Divide the 1984 I&S leyy (4-A above) by the 1884 Total taxable value (4-Babove)($ 1,492,496 + $ 85218581727 ) .............. I . " (D) Multiply by $1 00 val uation ..............................................'..... , (E) '··Effectlve I&S rate for 1984 .................................................'.. APPRAISAL ROLL ERROR RATE, . Is. (A) Rate to raise 1983 levy due to appral~ errors (Data 12) ....................... (8) Add rate to regain taxes 108t due to errors (Data 13) ...................... ~ . . . . I (C) Total Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors ..: ~ · · . . · . · · · . · · · · · . · . · . . · · · · · · · · · · · TOTAL EFFECTIVE TAX RATE FOR 1184 Ie. (A) Effective M&O rate (3-C above) ~. ,. . · . . . . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · (8) Add Effective I&S rate (4-E above) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I . I (0) Add Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors (5-C above) ........................ . (D) 1884 Effective Tax Rate ..................................................... ... $ . ,3.. 448.. 582 -$ 1~517.376 -$ '- $ 991 - $ 6,858 .- $ --- $ ,1,923,357_' $ 852!t858.727 - $ 32.. 63~.. 224 -$ $ 829,220,503 $ .OO?~Ú~ )( $100 $ .2345 1$100 $ 1.úQ'.L..QI; $ 852,858,727 $ .001750 )( $100 $ .175(1$100 " . $ --- 1$100 +$ --- 1$100 $ - IS100 $ .2345 1$100 +$ .1750 IS100 +$ IS100 $ .4095 -/$100 3% 1984 Effective Tax Rate Is the tax rate published as required by Sec. 26.04, Property Tax Code. Maximum .0122 /$100 .4217 /$100 lr I I' . I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ,. I City of j\(8rth Richland Hills, Texas August 8, 1984 Memo to: Mayor/City Council From: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Subject: Sound System in Council Chambers John Whitney has recently finished a complete reworking of the sound system in the Council Chambers. Improvements include: 1. 24 speakers are now in place - before we had six.: 2. An automatic mixer has been added which was custom made for the room size and acoustics. 3. There is now an individual sensitivity adjustment for each microphone. A word of caution - the new system is extremely sensitive and private conversations will not be possible at the Council table. You no longer have to speak directly into the microphone. There may be some feedback at first as the sound engineer could not adjust the system properly with an empty room. John will be present at the next few meetings to troubleshoot any problems. J~ ( i' <~.,/~ DH/gp (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E, LOOP 820/P.O, BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 - I I ,. I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~-L.) DATE: August 13, 1984 SUBJECT: PZ 84-44 and 45 - John Cook's Proposal on Hewitt Street DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Administration Richard Albin and Delbert Stembridqe. John Cook's enqineerr hñVP been unable to meet due to Mr. Cook's absence from the Ci~y. It is unclear, at this time, if Mr. Cook wants to pursue hi~ development. Legal notices have been published and his appeal appears on the formal agenda. Mr. Cook will be back in town on Monday and I will contact him and ask if he wants the matter heard, postponed or withdrawn. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: N/A BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A I I I- I 1m: . I , /?ß ~p ¡(!( #/ . August 1, 1984 Rodger N. Line City Manager Lou Spiegel Director of Finance Iject: Tax Rates calculated effective tax rates tables: Attached are I 1) Tax Rate with no exemption change 2) Tax Rate with $15,000 over-65'" exemption I 3) Tax Rate with $15,000 over-65 and 10% residence homestead I 4) Tax Rate with $15,000 over-65 and 20% residence homestead 5) Tax Bill Effect at Effective Tax Rate 1_6) 7) I Tax Bill Effect at Maximum Effective Tax Rate Effect of Rates on Budget In Table 1 - no exemption change - the calculated tax rate would drop to .3328/$100 assessed valuation. This change from the .4095/$100 that we used at work session due to tit new figures that we received on July 26 from TAD which had higher increases in assessed alues on 1983 properties than previously reported to us, to the extent of approximately $10,000,000. In Table 2 - over-65 Exemption $15,000 - the tax rate would be .3329/$100. I In Table 3 - over-65 $15,000 + 10% Residence Homestead - the calculated Tax Rate w ld be .3432/$100 and this will not cover the amount needed for the budget. We will b¡approXimatelY $104,837 short. The reason for this is that in the year that you g nt a new exemption, State law requires that you must reduce the amount of tax revenue raised in the prior year associated with this exemption. To figure this we used 1983 S~gle family appraised value $411,067,182 X 10% = $41,106,718 X .28/$100 (M&O Rate 1983) = $115,098 revenue lost due to new exemption. To arrive at amount of exemptions fit 1984 I took the Total Appraised Value X 62% X 10% to arrive at Taxable Value for calculations. (The 1984 Tax roll is estimated by TAD to be comprised 62% of single ~ residences.) I figured the revenue lost for the over-65 change also. All of I I I e IIrevenue lost due to new exemptions is the number in DATA ITEM #6. To come close the amount required for the budget, (within $7,269) you need to set the rate at the IJmum Effective Tax Rate (3% limit without Public Hearing) which is .3534/$100. In Table 4 - over-65 $15,000 + 20% Residence Homestead - the tax rate would 113558/$100 and this will be approximately $215,375 short of budget. This is due !lame reason as explained in Table 3 and we used the same method except we used linstead of 10% in the calculations. Compare the effect to DATA ITEM 6 of the ptions to revenue. To give 20% Residence Homestead exemption you would need to I- e the tax rate approximately 6.5% above the effective tax rate, thereby forcing blic hearing on the tax rate, which would have to be advertised in the City's fficial newspaper in a one quarter page ad as a tax rate increase. I In Table 5 and Table 6 - I have summarized the effect of each of the methods f exemptions on the tax bills at the Effective Tax Rate and the Maximum Effective alRate. Table 7 will show the effect of each tax rate on the Tax Levy and the f ct on the budget. I_he I 1) 2) 3) exemptions are deducted in the following order: Percentage Residence Homestead Over-65 Disabled Veterans I If you do decide to give the Residence Homestead exemption, the citizens that have iled with TAD for homestead for County or School district would also qualify for the ~ exemption. Per State law a citizen can file for a homestead exemption up to one ear after the delinquency date for that tax year and the refund is retroactive. (For iIFple 1984 tax year, a citizen could file an application up to January 31, 1986 and eceive a refund for taxes paid on this exemption amount.) J When the tape for this year is received from TAD the programmer can run different ail information for each of the different methods for exemptions to determine the la1 effect on the tax rate. The tape may be received by August 10th. Then you ld have more actual information on which to base the calculation of the tax rate. contained in this report does contain several assumptions which could down. I have discussed this with the programmer and he said could pull the information together ¡ttòe I ,I I ItIt relatively short length of time. If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact ,e. lincerelY, /' I ,a) ~<{., Jpu-rf[' . Lou Spiegel I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I ·1 I·~·, -, Ie CIIy or Specl., DI.trlcl: I NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND IUBLICATION OF ESTIMATED UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCES t .._________1-- TABLE 1 NO EXEMPTION CHANGE ,.' ~~--""'="-~'~-_''''''.''''''') - -~&.....;a.""",_",_~."",___.__, . ......._ ...,....-... . ,., ,__._ 4.0... . ... '-..Þtt" ...-..... .... .. ..,. .#. ........ ..,.~ InameJ (nome' . (ti,Je/pos'i,ion' for (jurisdiction' . n accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04, Property Tax Code. have calculated the tax rate which may not be leeded by more than three percent by the governing body of the (jurisdictionl without holding a public rins 81 required by the code. That fate jl al fo]lows: S per $100 of value. he estimated unencumbered fund balance for Maintenance a Operation fund: I . The '.mated unencumbered fund balance for Interest a Sinking fund: S lime Titlel osition IjALCULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE DATA 11983 total tax levy from the 1983 tax roll ....................................... 2. 1983 Tax rate ($ ~ M&O and' dL I&S) ... ...... . . .. ........ .... .... ..... J 1883 Debt aervlce (1& S) levy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · 1883 Maintenance & Operation (M&O) ......................................... .1883 MaO taxes on property In territory that has ceased to be . part of unit In 1184 ... .1983 M&O taxes on property becoming exempt In 1184 ......................... 7. 1883 M&O taxes on taxable va'u.'olt beeaus. property I. appraised at less than market IvaI ~e In 1884 ................................................................ ~1984 Total taxable value of all property ........................................ '-1884 Taxable value of new Improyements added .Ince Jan. 1, 1183 .............. .1984 Taxable value of property annexed alnce Jan. 1. 1183 ...................... 1. 1884 Tax levy needed to ..tisly debt "Me. (I&S) ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. . . ....... ~te to FIIlae 1983 tax due levy to appral..1 roll error. (lOIt dollar. divided by 1884 llfaxable value) ($ + . )( 100) ........... ."te to regain taxes 10lt In 1983 due to appralsar roll errors (lost dollars divided by .884 taxable values)(S .. , )C 100) ..... · ì. M&O Taxes u.ed to regain 100t 1982 levy .................................. I , S S , , , 3,448,582 · 50 IS100 1,517,376 1,931,206 . 4,659 , 1,896 S1,053,073,981 , 46.436.167 , , 1,492,496 $ -/5100 S -/1100 , t ·1 I 1-- ~~-----.... ...-.- . ~ ~_ 1IIIIIIII-"-'" . -.. .. .83 Total tax levy (Data 1) ...........'....................:.................. ) a.btract 1883 Debt aervlce levy (Data 3) ...................................... ) Subtract 1883 Taxes on property no longer In unit (Data 5) ..................... ) IUbtract 1983 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) ........................... .'. ..... Subtract 1883 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) ......................... ) ~btract 1983 Taxes used to regain 108t 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... ).djusted 1983 M&O levy ..... .". .. · · · · · · · · · · · · .. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. · · · · · · · ) ~84 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... ) lubtract , 884 V~'ue of new Improvements (Data 8) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ) Subtract 1884 Value of annexed property (Data 10) ............................ )Ljusted 1984 Taxable value for M&O ........................................ )~Ivide the Adjusted 1983 M&O leVï (1-G above) by the Adlusted 1984 taxable yalue for M&O (2-D aboveUS 1.924.651 + $ 1,006.637 ,814 ).. )-'IY by S 100 valuation ................................................... ) Effective MIO rate for 1884 ................................................. 1ST AND SINKING (I&S) TAX RATE " 1884 I&S levy needed to ..tisty debt (Data 1 1) ................................. 884 Total taxable value of an property (Data 8) ....... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Ivide the 1884 I&S ~ (4-A above) ~ the 1884 Total taxable value (4-Babove)($ 1,492,4 6 + $ 1. 53.073.981 ) .............. JUItiPIY by $100 valuation ................................................... Effective 1&5 rate for 1884 ................................................... ....................... ] s -S -$ -$ -$ -I $ $ -S -$ S 3,448,582 1.517.376 4,659 1,896 1,924,651 1,053,073,981 46,436,167 1,006,637,814 S .001911 )( $100 S .1911 IS100 , 1,492,496 S 1,053,073,981 , .001417 )( '100 I .1417 /S1oo , .1 I IS100 IS100 IS100 I .1911 /S1oo d Effective I&S rate (4-E above) ........................................... + $ .1417 "100 dd Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors (5-C above) ......................... + $ IS1{)O ~. Effective Tax Rate ................................................... _3.% $ · 3328 /S1oo .uu~~ ] 1984 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE .................................... .3427 1884 Eftective rax Rate Is the tax rate published as required by Sec. 26.04, Property rax Code. I I 1-- ] ~=........~.-... . . ~...-.-..--- . -.- 3,448,582 1~517~376 s -S -S -S -S -S S S -S -, $ 183 Total tax levy (Data 1) .......... '." · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · : · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · btract 1883 Debt aervlce levy (Data 3) ...................................... ~ Subtract 1883 Taxes on property no longer In unit (Data 5) ..................... ) Jbtract 1983 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) ............................-...... Subtract 1883 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) ......................... I'btract 1983 Taxes used to regain lost 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... ) 'djultad 1983 M&O levy .................................................... ) "84 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... ) lubtract 1984 V~lue of new Improvements (Data 8) ................... · · · · · · · · · ) Subtract 1884 Value of annexed property (Data 10) ............................ >tjUsted 19&4 Taxable value for M&O ........................................ ) Divide'" Adjusted 1983 M&O le~ (1-G above) by the Adlusted 1984 taxable _~e for M&O (2-D aboveHS 1 ~ 924.651 +. 1 ,006 ,637 .814 ).. ) .Iy by S 100 valuation ................................................... ~:;c=~: ~~~K:t: ::::~~ ~~~.......................................... '884 I&S levy needed to ..tisfy debt (Data 1 1) ................................. >1984 Total taxable value of an property (Data 8) ....... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ~Ivlde the 1984 1&5 leVY (4-A above) by the 1984 Total taxable value (4-BaboYe)($ 1,492,496 +. 1.053.073.981 ) .............. I ultiply by S 100 valuation ................................................... 4,659 1,896 1,924,651 1,053,073,981 46,436,167 1,006,637,814 $ . 001911 )( $100 $ .1911 IS100 , 1,492,496 . 1,053,073,981 , .001417 . $100 , .1417 11100 Effective liS rate for 1884 ................................................... ISAL ROLL ERROR RATE ) Rate to ra'.. 1883 levy due to appraisal .rrorl (Data 12) ....................... .d rate to regain taxes lost due to errors (Data 13) ........................... ~'otal Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors .................................... EFFECTIVE TAX RATE FOR 1". 11100 11100 11100 I +S S .1911 11100 .1417 IS100 11100 .3328 15100 .uu~~ S +$ +$ S ffectlve M&O rate (3-C above) .............................................. I ,I ·r, 'e I . ... -~.. .." '~....;. . ,. jW"'-=""~""'__'.'-''''''''J . _'I: " TABLE 2 - -' ~ "~--............._.__, ~ .........0-.__,,___. .'... _ __ 0#_.. .. ,þr..~ ...-... ... $15,000 OVER-65 EXEMPTION or Specl.. Dlltrlcl: In.meJ I ' NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND iLLICATION OF ESTIMATED UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCES nome . 'ti"e/Dosi'ionJ for (jurisdictionJ , ccordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04. Property Tax Code. have calculated tbe tax rate which may not be .d by more than three percent by the 80verning body of the (jurisdiction) without hoJding a public . 81 required by the code. That rate is 81 follows: S perStOO of vaJue. eltimated unencumbered fund balance for Maintenance . Operation fund: I ed unencumbered fund balance for Interest . Sinking fund: S I . The f,.CULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE ATA 183 Total tax levy from the 1983 tax roll ....................................... 1883 Tax rate (S ..:1!.. MAO and S ..:lL I&S) ... ...... .... ...... . . .. ........... .3 Debt ..rviee (I&S) levy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 183 Maintenance a Operation (MaO) ......................................... .3 M&O taxes on property In territory that has ceased to be . part of unit In 1884 ... . M&O taxes on property becoming exempt In 1884 ......................... I~~~:~:;e~ .~~ ~~~~ ~a.'~~.I~~ .~~~~~.~~~~~.J~.~~~:~I.~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~. ~~~ 4 Total taxabl. value of all property . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · · . · .. . Taxable v.'ue of new Improvements .dded Ilnee Jan. 1, 1883 .............. .. Taxabl. value of property annexed Ilnee Jan. 1, 1883 ...................... 1184 Tax levy needed to Ntilfy debt I.Mee (I&S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . · · · · . . · · Ie to ralae 1883 tax due levy to appral.., roll error. (Jo.t dollar. divided by 1884 taxabl. value) (S + , x 100) ........... "e to regain taxes Ioat In 1983 due to appral..1 roll error. (lost dollars divided by ,~ taxable v81ues)($ + $ x 100) ..... 1"'0 Taxe. u.ed to regain 100t 1982 levy .................................. I S I S , I , 3.448.582 · 50 IS100 1.517,376 1,931,206 . 10.296 I 1.896 ,1,051,060,491 , 46,436,167 , , 1,492,496 s - IS100 , - IS100 , I 1--"., · .' · Ie 10% RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION 15,000 OVER - 65 EXEMPTION TABLE 3 .-......, .."... ..,....;. "..~"'-..:.~.;:a.,..~_._.._......., .....~~..~.....~~.__.';~_._,,-.;... ..., ...<1#...__.... ..~.'~ ....-....., r or Special ~I.trtct : InameJ . NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND .UBLICATION OF ESTIMATED UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCES ~ {nome} . (title/Dos'i,ion) for (iurisdictjon) . In accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04. Property Tax Code. have calculated the tax rate which may not be Iceeded by more than three percent by the ¡overning body of the (jurisdiction) without holding a public aring 8S required by the code. That rate is 8S follow.: S per 5100 of value. IWALCULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE I DATA I. 1983 Total tax levy from the 1983 tax roll ....................................... 2. 1883 Tax rate ($ --:l! M&O and S ..:l! I&S) . .... .... .. .. .. ........ .. ......... I. 1983 Debt .ervice (I&S) levy . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. 1883 Maintenance & Operation (M&O) ......................................... The estimeted unencumbered fund balance for Maintenance a Operation fund: S 'imated unencumbered fund balance for Interest a Sinking fund: . (Nome). ITjtle/DositionJ loteJ .- 1883 MAO taxes on property In territory that has ceased to be. part of unit In 1884 ... .. 1983 MaO taxes on property becoming exempt In 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ì' ~:~~ ~:~=e~ .~~ ~~~ ~~f~~.'~.'~ .~~~~~~.~~~~~.'~.~~~~~I.~ ~~ ~~ ~~. ~r~~t 8. 1884 Tota' taxable value of an property . . . . .'.. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. I- 1884 Taxabl. value of new Improvements added .Inee Jan. 1. 1M3 .............. . "84 Taxabl. value of property .nnexed Ilnce Jan. '. 1883 ...................... I- 1884 Tax levy needed to Utilty debt ..rviee (I&S) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · . Rate to raise 1183 tax due levy to appr.'aa' roll error. (lOlt dollar. divided by 1884 taxabl. value) (S + , )( 100) ........... I Rate to regain taxes 10lt In 1883 due to appralsa' roll errora (lolt dona,. divided by 1884 taxable values)(S + , )( 100) ..... 1_3 Mao Taxes uHd to regain lost 1982 levy .................................. I . The $ I $ , , S 3,448,582 .50 IS100 1,517,376 1,931,206 . 125,395 , 1,896 S 986,123,969 , 46,436,167 , , 1,492,496 $ - 15100 $ , - IS100 , I I ~... I .-.~.-.. .....- ...-... .. . . . . . . ... . ...-.-.~.....-.-.-. . -... - _¡ALCULA TION TENANCE AND OPERATION (M&O) TAX RATE _I) 1883 Total tax levy (Data 1) .......... '.' · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .: · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ) Subtract 1883 Debt lervlce levy (Data 3) ...................................... (C) Subtract 1883 Taxes on property no longer In unit (Data 5) ..................... t Subtract 1983 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) .................................. _ , Subtract 1983 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) .- .-.-...... · · · · .. · · · · .. .. .) Subtract 1983 Taxes uaed to regain 10lt 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... ~) Adjusted 1983 M&O levy .................................................... . JI) 1984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... ~) Subtract 1984 Vl!lue of new Improvements (Data 9) ............................ (C) Subtract 1884 Value of annexed property (Data 10) · - · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 1» Adjusted 1984 Taxable value for MiO ........................................ .'rA) Divide the Adjulted 1983 MiO levy (1-G above) by the Adjusted 1984 taxable value for MiO (2-D above) ,($ 1 , 919,014 +. 1 t 004 ,624 t 324. ). · IeUltiply by '100 valuation ................................................... '~::;=~::~:K:: f;:~.,; ~~~. · .. .... · · · · · · · · · · .. · · · · · · · · · · · · .. · · · · · · · · · _ (A) 1 884 I&S levy needed to aatisfy debt (Data 1 1) ................................. þ) 1984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... life> Divide the 1884 I&p aer 6 (4-A above) by the 1884 Total taxable value , (4-S above) ($ I, 92,~49 +. 1.051.060.491 ) .............. ID) Multiply by $100 valuation ............. -... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .. ... · · · · · · .. · · .. .. (E) Effective I&S rate for 1884 ............ - · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · :" 3,448,582 1,517,376 s -, -, -S -, -I , 1,919,014 S 1,051,060,491 46,436,167 -, -S ,1,004,624,324 10,296 1,896 $ . 001 910 )( $100 S .1910'5100 S 1.492.496 $ 1 ,051 t 060 t 491 $ .001419 )( $100 s . 1419/S1oo RAISAL ROLL ERROR ItA TE 5. (A) Rate to r.... 19831eYy due to .ppralsal errors (Data 12) . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . ... .. .. . - /S1oo 18) Add rate to regain taxes Iolt due to errors (Data 13) ........................... + . - /S1oo .,C) Total Rate to .djult for appraisal roll errors .................................... . - /S 1 00 ~~LE::::~T~~oT~.~~~~b~e:~~............................................ . .1910/'100 fIl8) Add Effective.iS rate (4-E above) ........................................... + . . 1419/S1oo .C) Add Rate to adIust for appraisal roll err!?,. (S-C above) ......................... + . - /$100 984 Effective Tax Rate ..................................................... . · 3329/$ 100 3% .0099 MUM 1984 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE ..................................... · 3428 1884 Etlectlve rax Rate Is the lax rate published as required by Sec. 26.04. Property rax Code. I I I 1- -r~"""""''' . . ..' . - . . ...--- ---.......-. . . ... . ...... ILCULATION I ENANCE "AND OPERATION (M&O) TAX RATE ~ 1983 Total tax levy (Data 1) .......... '. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · : · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · (. Subtract 1983 Debt eervlce levy (Data 3) ...................................... (C) Subtract 1983 Taxes on property no longer In unIt (Data 5) ..................... (I Subtract 1883 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) .................................. ( Subtract 1983 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) ......................... .. Subtract 1983 Taxes ueed to regain 108t 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... (I Adjusted 1883 MAO levy .................................................... (i 1984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... . Subtract 1984 V~Iue of new Improvements (Data 9) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · (C) Subtract 1984 Value of annexed property (Data 10) ............................ . Adjusted 18&4 Taxable value for M&O ........................................ Divide the Adjulted 1983 M&O levy (1-G above) by the Adjusted 1984 taxable value for M&O (2-DaboveH$ 1.803.915 +. 939.687)802 ).. 1_ItiPIY by $100 valuation ................................................... (C) Effective MAO rate tor 1884 ................................................. EST AND SINKING (I&S) TAX RATE (A) 1884 I&S levy needed to aatJsfy debt (Data 1 1) ................................. . 1984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... II> Divide the 1984 1&5 ~ (4-A above) by the 1984 Total taxable value , (4-Babove)($ 1,492, £» + S 986.123.969 ) .............. I) Multiply by '100 valuation ......................................,............. (E) Effective I&S rate tor 1184 ................................................... s -S -, -, -, -I S , -, -S $ 3,448,582 1,517,376 125.395 1,896 1,803,915 986.123.969 46,436,167 939,687,802 S .001919 )( $100 , .1919/1100 , 1,492,496 S 986,123,969 , .001513 )( $100 I .151311100 .AISAL ROLL ERROR RATE . ,) Rate to raise 1983 levy due to appraisal errors (Data 12) . . . . .... . .... .. ..... ... S - 11100 I) Add rate to regain taxellost due to errors (Data 13) ........................... + S - "100 ~ Total Rate to adjust for appralaal roll errors .................................... S - 11100 ILE::::T=:OT~ ~~: :b:e:·~~.........................................." S .1919 '.100 r Add Effective I&S rate (4-E above) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · + $ · 1513 "'00 ) Add Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors (5-C above) ......................... + . - '.'00 .- - 84 Effective Tax Rate ................................................... "", S · 34~~ 11100 ~/o .UIUl 1984 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE .................................... · j).:S4 1884 Effective rex Rete Ia the tex rete published 8S requIred by Sec. 26.04, Property rex Code. I I . ] ,I .-----~ . -I, , .... .. . Ie y or Specl.1 Dlatrlct : I NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND IUBLICATION OF ESTIMATED UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCES .. · - , -' ,,_.. . . - ~, .~..;. ". ';'~I~_= ~.;.:a.,.~ - -- r_~"""" . -~~..,.. .......,.'\0................_ _.' . ~ ____-.;.. # _.', , 1M :t,,~_ _4....-........., 20% RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION 15,000 OVER-65 EXEMPTION (name) ......-..,,= I (name' , IHIle/Dos'ilion) for (iurisdicUonf , n accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04. Property Tax Code, have calculated the tax rate which may not be leded by more than three percent by the ¡overnfn¡ body of the (jurisdiction) without hoJdin¡ a public ins a5 required by the code. That fate is 88 follow.: S per $100 of value. he estimated unencumbered fund balance (or Maintenance a Operation fund: S . The rated unencumbered fund balance for Interest A Sfnkfn¡ fund: . me Titlel osition I CALCULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE DIA . , 883 Total tax levy from the '883 tax roll ....................................... P'883 Tax rate (S _ M&O and $ -1&8) .................................. 11883 Debt aerviee (1& $) levy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · 1883 Maintenance & Operation (M&O) ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \i 1883 MAO taxes on property In territory that has cea..d to be a part of unit In 1884 ... .1883 M&O taxes on property becoming exempt In 1884 ......................... 7. 1883 M&O taxes on taxable value lost because property I. appraised at less than market lal~e In '884................................................................ 884 Total taxable value of an property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~'884 Taxable value of new Improvements added .'nee Jan. 1, 1183 ..... .... ..... .1884 Taxable v.lue of property annexed .'nee Jan. 1, 1883 ...................... 1. 1884 Tax levy needed to ..tilly debt .eMe. (I&S) ....... . . .. .. .. .. ............. 2Þate to raiN 1883 tax due levy to appral.., roll error. (loat dollar. divided by 1884 'uble value) (S + . )( 100) ........... ..te to regain taxes 10lt In 1883 due to appraIsal roll error. (Iolt dollars divided by 1884 taxable values)($ + I )( 100) ..... °ii MIO Taxe. u.ed to regain 10lt '882 levy .................................. I , 3..448~582 I · 50 11100 1 1~517~376 I 1,931,206 , , - . 240,494 1,896 , 1919,173,956 , 46.436.167 , , 1,492,496 I - 11100 , - 11100 , . I I :-e- I -.,...-.......-.... .. .. . ..-....-...---... ~--- ..--.--- .~ .. ) ~983 T ota I tax levy (Data 1) .......... '.- · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · : · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )Iubtract 1983 Debt aervlce levy (Data 3) ...................................... ) Subtract 1883 Taxes on property no longer In unit (Data 5) ..................... .ubtract 1983 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) ...........................:...... )'ubtract 1883 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) ......................... Wubtract 1983 Taxes uaed to regain lost 1982 levy (Data 14) .................... ¡~dju.ted 1983 M&O levy .................................................... >. 1884 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · IUbtract 1984 V'!lue of new Improvements (Data 9) ............................ ) Subtract 1884 Value of annexed property (Data 10) ............................ .djusted 1984 Taxable value for M&O ........................................ ~Ivlde the Adjusted 1983 M&O levy (1-G above) by the Adjusted 1984 taxable valueforM&O(2-DaboveUS 1.688,816 +. 8721737.789 ).. B~PIY by $100 valuation ................................................... C) Effective M&O rate tor 1184 ................................................. +ST AND SINKING (laS) TAX RATE A) '884 I&S levy needed to ..tist)' debt (Data 11) ................................. "984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) ............................... dIolvlde the 1884 I&S levY (4-A above) by the 1884 Total taxable value (4-aabove). 1.492.496 +. 919.173.956 ) .............. .UItlPIY by $100 valuation ......................................,............. Effective I&S rate for 1884 ................................................... :" s -S -S -S -S -I S S -S -S S 3,448,582 1,517,376 240,494 1,896 1,688,816 919,173,956 46,436,167 872,737,789 S .001935 )( $100 I .1935 1$100 , 1~492~496 S 919,173,956 , .001623 )C '100 , . 1623 IS100 .ISAL ROLL ERROR RATE ~te to raise 1883 levy due to appraisal errors (Data 12) .. . .... ... . .. .. .. . . . .... -/$100 .Add rate to regain taxes lost due to .rrors (Data 13) ........................... + . -/1100 ~otal Rate to adjust for appraisal roll .rrors ..................................... -"100 IE::::T::oT:e ~~: :b::e:·~~. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . ... . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . ..... .... . · 1935 /1100 ~ Add Effective I&S rate (4-E above) . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . . . . .. .. · . · .. .. .. · + . · 1623 11100 ~dd Rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors (S-C above) ......................... + . -/S1oo D.-' 4 Effective Tax Rate .................................................... & . · 3 5 ~ 8 11100 3% .UIUb aximum 1984 Effective Tax Rate ............................... .3664 1884 Ellective Tax Rate Ia the tax rate published., requIred by Sec. 26.04. Property Tax Code. I I I Ie JOF IDENCE 0100 0,000 0100 0,000 01>00 O~OO 100 I Ie 01°00 00 0,000 too 0,000 .00 ~OO I I I I -- I TABLE 5 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1984-85 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE .3328/$100 .3432/$100 .3558/$100 TAX BILL WITH TAX BILL WITH TAX BILL WITH NO EXEMPTION 10% RESIDENCE SAVINGS 20% RESIDENCE SAVINGS CHANGE EXEMPTION EXEMPTION $133.12 $123.55 $ 9.57 $113.86 $19.26 166.40 154.44 11.96 142.32 24.08 199.68 185.33 14.35 170.78 28.90 232.96 216.22 ~' 16. 7 4 ~ 199.25 33.71 266.24 247.10 19.14 227.71 38.53 299.52 277.99 21.53 256.18 43.34 332.80 308.88 23.92 284.64 48.16 OVER - 65 TAX BILL WITH EXEMPTIONS STATED ABOVE, PLUS INCREASE IN SENIOR CITIZENS EXEMPTION TO $15,000 $ 90.75 124.03 157.31 190.59 223.87 257.15 290.43 $ 72.07 102.96 133.85 164.74 195.62 226.51 257.40 $18.68 21.07 23.46 25.85 28.25 30.64 33.03 $ 60.49 88.95 117.41 145.88 174.34 202.81 231.27 $30.26 35.08 39.90 44.71 49.53 54.34 59.16 I I Ie I OF SIDENCE .000 50,000 tooo 70,000 1000 ,000 1000 Ie I 1000 ,000 6&,000 ii, 000 80,000 1,000 00,000 I I I -- I TABLE 6 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1984-85 MAXIMUM CALCULATED EFFECTIVE TAX RATE .3328/$100 .3534/$100 .3664/$100 TAX BILL WITH TAX BILL WITH TAX BILL WITH NO 10% EXEMPTION 20% EXEMPTION EXEMPTION 3% MAXIMUM SAVINGS 3 % MAXIMUM SAVINGS CHANGE INCREASE INCLUDED INCREASE INCLUDED $133.12 $127.22 $ 5.90 $117.25 $15.87 166.40 159.03 7.37 146.56 19.84 199.68 190.84 8.84 175.87 23.81 232.96 222.64 10.32 205.18 27.78 266.24 254.45 11.79 234.50 31.74 299.52 286.25 13.27 263.81 35.71 332.80 318.06 14.74 293.12 39.68 OVER - 65 TAX BILL WITH EXEMPTIONS STATED ABOVE, PLUS INCREASE IN SENIOR CITIZENS EXEMPTIONS $15,000 $ 90.75 124.03 157.31 190.59 223.87 257.15 290.43 $ 74.21 106.02 137.83 169.63 201.44 233.24 265.05 16.54 18.01 19.48 20.96 22.43 23.91 25.38 $ 62.29 91.60 120.91 150.22 179.54 208.85 238.16 $28.46 32.43 36.40 40.37 44.33 48.30 52.27 I II Ie I~ I TABLE 7 TAX RATE & EFFECT ON BUDGET OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE NO EXEMPTION CHANGE $15.000 OVER-65 & 0 RATE S RATE RATE .1911 .1910 .1417 .1419 .3328 .3329 3.504.630 3.498.980 97% 97% 3.399.491 3.394.010 1.492.496 1.492.496 1.906.995 1.901.514 1.895.186 1.895.186 1.906.995 1.901.514 11.809 6.328 lLEVY ET EBT EIRAL FUND ROPOSED BUDGET \¡I~~ER) BUDGET Ie I $15.000 . OVER-65 & 10% RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD $15.000 OVER-65 & 20% RESIDENCE HOMESTEAD .1919 .1513 .3432 .1935 .1623 .3558 3.384.377 97% 3.282.845 1.492.496 1.790.349 3.270.420 97% 3.172.307 1.492.496 1.679.811 1.895.186 1.790.349 (104.837) 1.895.186 1.679.811 (215.375) TAX RATE & EFFECT ON BUDGET OF MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE TAX RATE .2010 .2009 .2021 .2041 .1417 .1419 ~ .1623 .3427 .3428 , . 534 .3664 3.608.884 3.603.035 3.484.962 3.367,853 97% 97% 97% 97% 3.500.617 3.494.943 3.380.413 3.266.817 1.492.496 1.492.496 1.492.496 1.492.496 2.008.121 2.002.447 1.887.917 1.774.321 OSED BUDGET 1.895.186 1.895.186 1.895.186 1.895.186 !MUM EFFECTIVE 2.008.121 2.002.447 1.887.917 1,774.321 ,(UNDER) BUDGET 112.935 107.261 (7.269) (120.865) ç EFFECT ON TAX RATE 105.307 105.106 98.612 91.917 I -- I .. , - I Senior Citizens Alliance of Tarrant County Incorporated .III0norable Mayors, City Councils. County Judge l-nnd County Commissioners of Tarrant County: On behalf of the nearly 50 member organizations of the Senior Citizens Alliance of Tarrant County, we want you to know our great concern about pos- I sible large tax increases on the homesteads of older citizens which may re- sult from the recent tax appraisals by the Tarrant Appraisal Distriçt. Our members, most of whom are living on low fixed incomes, cannot pay increased II homestead taxes. Undoubtedly, you are hearing the dismay of many older cit- izens at the 100% and more increases in their homestead tax valuations. While we recognize that tax rates may be reduced, the large increased I tax appraisals, especially on the older homes owned by most older citizens, will increase their tax burden beyond their ability to pay, unless the tax exemption on the homesteads of those over 65 years is increased in an amount II proportionate to the valuation increase. We respectfully urge an increase in the homestead tax exemption for those over 65 to not less than $50,000 - the exemption extended in Dallas, Brazos, Galveston, Orange, Travis and perhaps lather counties. We believe such action b:)' the County Board and all City Coun·- cils is necessary to avoid tax increases older homeowners cannot afford. While some older citizens are well off financially, the large portion I are dependent on Social Security or other limited retirement annuity. In- cluding the recent modest cost-of-living adjustment, the average SS retired worker receives only $430 per month and the average for an elderly couple is only $744. A study by the National Council on Aging concluded that 75% of ~all persons 65 and over depend on Social Security or other limited pension. Texas Senate study found that the income level of persons over 65 in Texas , s about half that of those under 65 years. Already faced with escalating II utili ty, medical and other Ii ving costs, mo,st senior ci tizens have no margin for increased taxes. I I I I I June 6, 1984 The Texas Constitution and laws recognize that older citizens who have paid full taxes during their working years, in fairness and equity, are en- titled to relief from increasing taxation on their homesteads upon retire- ment. In enacting th'e Peveto legislation, special authorization was included to increase exemptions to avoid hardship. Sec. JJ. 06 of the Texas Tax Code authoriz,es those over 65 to stop pay- ing homestead taxes by filing an affidavit with the Appraisal District. This is not a yery satisfactory solution to the taxing agencies nor to the older citizens. Taxing agencies would be deprived of needed tax revenues for sev- eral years, and, while the older citizens would have relief ~s long ~~ +hOH kept the property as their homeste~n- +~V ,~-~- imately by the heirs or future ~ tion is the collection of rea~ Texas is paying more tr elderly in nursing homes. saved by helping the eld' I health care and other ~ their homes. Accordj- izens live in their ~der citizens wa~ ~ their homes - costs will incr public expens I #~(1···' ) ~I I .- SUBJECT: I DATE: An ¡?1 ~ t- 11 f 1 QAL... Off-Site Storm Water Drainage rl EP ARTHENT : IøACKGROUND: Administration During the past few months there have been several cases where developers are unable to obtain a letter from downstream owners the The most recent case is on the a enda for action Monda 1 Evans, re Bud Austin Kin swood Estates · A similar situation now exists with the Foster The downstream owners have refused I Surveyor to enter the property. Referencè Gene Riddle's memo to Rod er Line on his surve of cities II on the way the handled this roblem. Gene's recommendation is contained in of his memo. II Request this item be discussed in Pre-Council and the staff directed to h re are II an appropriate ordinance based on the Councils desire. I I I I I I_Y I COUNCIL ACTION lIQUIRED: IUDCETED ITÐI: YES 110 I. '- INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM Rodger N. Line, City Manager DATE AU2ust 2 1::4 SUBJECT Off Sit: D . inaie ~urvey for Subdivisions f;I tROM Gene Riddle. Director Public Works REF: PWM-0032-84 I As you had requested, I have surveyed five different cities in the Metroplex .oncerning their policies on off site storm water discharge. After talking to he directors of Public Works in these five cities, I have changed my opinion nd recommendation concerning what we should do with the developers in our City. Ii now recommend that we require more than just the letter of approval that we have been requiring. My recommendation is that we require a minimum of I temporary drainage easement and that the developer's engineer design the ischarge so that it will not cause any off site erosion. fy recommendation is based on the comments that I received from the five ities involved in the survey. Also, the City of Hurst is sending me some ecent literature that they obtained in a training session on this matter. The following is the results of a survey of the five cities. ~4IÞ Hurst - Requires the developer to obtain an easement from the downstream property owner. They feel like that I if they 'do not have an easement from the downstream property owner, the downstream property owner could block the flow legally. This also makes the down- I stream property owner more aware of what's taking place across his property. I I I I I Ie I Haltom City - They also obtain an easement plus they require the developer's engineer to show that they have designed a facility that will not cause erosion downstream. If they cannot control the erosion problem downstream in a proper manner then they must improve the downstream drainage facility until the erosion problem is taken care of. Bedford - Handles the problem in the same manner in which we do. They simply require a letter from the downstream property owner stating that he has given his permission for the discharge of storm water onto his property. Euless - Requires a letter from the downstream property owner that he gives his permission for the storm water to be discharged across his property and that he also understands that erosion will probably take place across his property. Arlington - Requires that the upstream developer must obtain a detailed ' letter signed by the downstream property owner stating that he is aware of all of the drainage facilities that are going in and how they are going to effect his property. Or instead of the letter, the upstream developer can obtain an easement from the downstream property owner. I .. ... ... Mr. Rodger Line I August 2, 1984 ""'"'ge 2 - IIThere are two cities of this five that Knowlton-English-Flowers represent for engineering purposes and they are Bedford and Euless. Sometimes K-E-F Idoes special projects for the City of Hurst. I I Gene Riddle I I I te I I I I I I II I_ I- I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I . ~ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS. HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JULY 23, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order July 23, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Jim Kenna Virginia Moody Harold Newman Jim Ramsey Staff: Dennis Horvath Ginny Pierce Rex McEntire Gene Riddle Richard Albin Lou Spiegel Marjorie Nash Press: Mark England David Doremus Karin Gregory Absent: Marie Hinkle Rodger N. Line Jeanette Moore Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Assistant City Manager Acting City Secretary City Attorney Director Public Works/Utilities City Engineer Finance Director Planning & Zoning Comm. Mid Cities Daily News Northeast Chronicle Citizens Journal Councilwoman City Manager City Secretary 3. The invocation was given by Councilman Newman. 4. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve the minutes of the July 9, 1984 meeting. Motion carried 5-0, Councilman Kenna abstaining due to absence. 5. None 6. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve the Consent Agenda. MOtion carried 6-0. ¿/ ,- CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JULY 9, 1984 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEM (5) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM ( S) IND ICATED BY ASTERISK (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19) APPROVED .. I I Ie 7. I I I I II I Ie II I I I II I I I_ II Mayor Echols read the following Resolution: RESOLUTION APPOINTING DIRECTOR TO CONET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City North Richland, Texas, that Virginia Moody be and hereby is appointed Representative to CONET and Dennis Horvath is . hereby appointed Alternate Representative to represent the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on the Board of Directors of Cities/Chambers of North East Tarrant (CONET) effective from this date and until their successors have been appointed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the payment of a membership fee of twenty-five ($25.00) Dollars is hereby authorized. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Resolution 84-19. Motion carried 6-0. 8. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve the bid from Prudential for the issuance and sale of $2,000,000 waterworks and sewer system revenue bonds, Series 1984, at 'the net effective interest rate of 10.1823%. Motion carried 6-0. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Ordinance No. 1142 authorizing the issuance of $2,000,000 for the City of North Richland Hills waterworks and sewer system revenue bonds. Motion carried 6-0. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Resolution No. 84-21 approving and authorizing the execution of a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement in relation to the bonds. Motion carried 6-0. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Harold McInroe, who went on the bond rating trip to New York, was present tonight and might have something he would like to say. Mr. McInroe appeared before the Council. Mr. McInroe stated that he felt that the City was doing a great thing. July 23, 1984 Page 2 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION REGARDING MEMBERSHIP IN CONET AND APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVE AND of ALTERNATE (RESOLUTION NO. 84-19 - POSTPONED AT THE JULY 9, 1984 COUNCIL MEETING) RESOLUTION NO. 84-19 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $2,000,000 "CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, WATERWORKS AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1984" ORDINANCE NO. 1142 RESOLUTION 84-21 APPROVED I II Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I II I I Ie I ~ . *10. *11. *12. 9. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to postpone this item until the next Council Meeting. Motion carried 6-0. Councilman Kenna stated that Mr. Hubbard needed to be notified that his presence was necessary. July 23, 1984 Page 3 CONSIDERATION OF to REQUEST OF T. J. HUBBARD, 7708 BUCK STREET, FOR A VARIANCE TO THE BRICR ORDINANCE POSTPONED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-55, REQUEST OF J. C. GIDEON FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BRADFORD ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF KELLER-SMITHFIELD ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 425 FEET SOUTH OF SHADY GROVE ROAD) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-56, REQUEST OF GARRETT SHERMAN FOR FINAL PLAT OF BLOCKS 2-8, EDEN ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EDEN ROAD AN] BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE RAILROAD AND ON THE NORTH BY FLAMINGO ESTATES) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-57, REQUEST OF BILL FENIMORE FOR REPLAT OF LOT 19, BLOCK 33, HOLIDAY WEST ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUT SIDE OF BUENOS AIRES DRIVE AND APPROXI- MATELY 220 FEET EAST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) APPROVED I July 23, 1984 Page 4 I *13. PLANNING & ZONING - I_ PS 84-59, REQUEST OF TOM CUNNINGHAM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR REPLAT OF LOT I 13A-R, BLOCK 5, NORD RICHLAND HILLS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF I GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY ~ 210 FEET SOUTH OF TURNER TERRACE) I APPROVED *14. PLANNING & ZONING - I PS 84-63, REQUEST OF JEFF MARSH FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 THRU 10, BLOCK 22, I KINGSWOOD ESTATED (LOCATED ON THE NORT} SIDE OF STARNES ROAD I AND APPROXIMATELY 50( FEET WEST OF RED OAK STREET) APPROVED 1_ *15. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION GRANTING I APPROV AL TO TARRANT COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION I TO ADMINISTER HOME MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS APPROVED I *16. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, I ESTIMATE 87, IN THE AMOUNT OF $149,893.1: TO STEELE-FREEMAN - I NORTHFIELD AND NORICI PARK IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED I *17. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #11, IN THE I AMOUNT OF $11,215.98 TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY - RUFE SNOW 1_ PHASE II APPROVED I I I _ *18. I - . I I I I I I I_ I II I I I I I I_ I *19. 19a. Mr. Horvath stated that the City Secretary's position was a unique position and that person was not always available to sign certain legal documents that require her signature. The City Council needs to appoint an alternate, an Assistant City Secretary. Mr. Horvath stated that the staff recommends Ms. Virginia (Ginny) Pierce as Assistant City Secretary to sign legal documents. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Ginny Pierce as Assistant City Secretary. Motion carried 6-0. 20. None 21. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to adjourn the July 23, 1984 meeting. Motion carried 6-0. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Ginny Pierce - Assistant City Secretary July 23, 1984 Page 5 CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE H10, IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,560.29 TO M. A. VINSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - WALKER'S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY FOR A SEWER LINE CROSSING RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSISTANT CITY SECRETARY APPROVED CITIZEN PRESENTATION ADJOURNMENT I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I DATE: 8/13/84 SUBJECT: Presentation of Proclamation to Jim Martin DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Administration See attached letter from Steve Kamprath of Classic Cleaners. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: N/A BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A ~k46ic ~ka--11~ 7809-Ä Grapevine Hwy. F.t. Worth, Texas 76118 (817) 281-7939 August 1, 1984 The Honorable Dan Echols Mayor of North Richland Hills P.o. Box 184)8 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Mayor Echols: As per our phone conversation, I am including a brief synopsis of events that took place in regard of our alteration lady being accosted. I would appreciate any recognition that the city could provide for this act of a concerned citizen, Jim Martin. Hazel Bowlby, our alteration lady, was leaving work around noon, Wednesday, July 25. She had reached her car when out of no where, a car pulled up beside her and a man jumped out to~atched her purse. Hazel didn't give it up and struggled with the man. In the meantime, Jim Martin of Martin's Barber Shop saw this happening and ran to aid Hazel. Just before reaching her, the man was able to e~cape with the purse. He had been successful in wrestling Hazel to the ground. Mr. Martin ran to his car and proceeded to chase the purse snatcher. This lasted for some time when finally the man made a wrong turn and was cornered on a cul-de-sac. He drove up to Mr. Martin and asked if he could give the purse back, and in turn be let go. The man sped. away. Mr. Martin returned the purse and money intacted. The action of this one man is, partly along with an excellent police department, responsib16 in retrieving the purse and apprehended the criminal. It is even nicer to help Hazel Bowlby, who is 79 years old. It is exciting to me that there are still people around that will "get involved" in this day and time of "I don't want to get involved." ~'~s¿,/ ,.- 1(, U If/ " C:t ~J Jf2 -- "~teve"--K ~rath . Owner -, -... I I ~ I_ I I I , I I Ie I I I I I I I P City of ~orth 1tichIand Hills ~ I ii, , ! \ , " S f ,~ : J~ :/ - · tar 0 the '-Metroplex \ WHEREAS, on July 25th, 1984, J.ún MaILUn cUd c:Li6play unc.ommon c.oUltage and bJLaVVLY ,in hetp,ing apPlLehend and bJÚYLg .to j(.U)ÜC-e apuJLðe -6na.teheIL; and WHEREAS, J.ún MaJLtúL ac.ted w.{;thou;t lLegaJui 601L ~ peJL.6onai .6a6e:ty and well.-bUng, and WHEREAS, J,Ún MaILUn lAXL6 a.ble to lle.Á:lLi.,eve and lletuJtn -6toien plLopeJt:ty to Œ JLight6ul awneJL; and WHEREAS, J.ún MaILUn lAXL6 a c.anc.eJu1.ed c,U:,¿Ze.YL who .óhould be. c.omme.nde.d 60Jt ~ e.xe.mplaJr.y public. .6eJz.v-i.c.e. 60Jt the. Cdy 06 NoJLth 1U.c.heand H~j NOW THEREFORE 1, Van Ec.haL6, f.K.tYOIl 06 the Cdy 06 NolLth fUc.hi.a.nd Hill..6, T e.xa..6 , tak.e. gJtea:t pJLide. ,in j o-úU..ng wäh the COW1.æ ,in -6how,inr . plLoc.W1n Tuuday, AI VAY ,in the Cäy 0/ I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of Xrth Richland Hills~ Texas TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 1. PS 84-67 2. PZ 84-22 3. PZ 84-45 4. PZ 84-44 Rodger Line City Manager DATE: August 9, 1984 Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator Cases to be heard by City Council August 13, 1984 Request of Southland Financial Service for replat of Blocks 46R, 48R, Lots lR thru 5R, Block 20, and Lots lR thru 5R, Block 49, Foster Village Addition. Request of Bursey Joint Venture for an Appeal Hearing to rezone Tract 1Al and a portion of Tract lA, Thomas Sprouce Survey, Abstract 1399, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-7-MF (Multi-Family). This property is located on the south side of Bursey Road, approximately 843 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. Request of JONCO Development Company for an Appeal Hearing to rezone Tract 3, J. C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-5-D (Duplex). This property is located on the west side of Smithfield Road, bounded on the west by Hewitt Street,· and approximately 550 feet north of Chapman Road. Request of John Cook to rezone Tracts 4A, 4C3, & 4D, J.C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family). This property is located on the north side of Chapman Road, bounded on the west by McComas Addition, and a portion is bounded on the east by Hewitt Street. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 I I. I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 5. PZ 84-42 6. PZ 84-54 7. PZ 84-55 8. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ for a change in the Multi-Family Planned Development zoning in Ordinance #1033 to read: If church related uses are constructed on the property, the requirement for a turn around bridge over Loop 820 and the masonry wall abutting the single family to the south will be waived. If any part of the 53.8861 acre tract is developed as Multi-Family, the original stipulations on Ordinance #1033 will apply. This property is located on the south side of Northeast Loop 820, west of Rufe Snow Drive, and bounded on the south by the TESCO right-of-way. Request of Bill Marcom to rezone Tract 4Rl, A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630, from its present classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located on the east side of Flory Street, approximately 450 feet north of Harmonson Road. Request of Burk Collihs Investments, Inc. to rezone Blocks 1 & 2, Fox Hollow Addition, from their present classification of R-3 (Single Family) to R-5-D (Duplex). This property is located north of Watauga Road, bounded on the south by the railroad and on the west by North Park Estates. R-3 1-2 ZONING MAP OF NORTH RICHLAND IJI.LLS AC THIS MAP CURRENT THROUGH ORDINANCE NO. 1085 OR THROUGH LAST OI!tDtNANCELtSTED IN REVISION 8l0CK. COMMISSION I I :1IÞ I SUBJECT: (' C:' DATE: August 9, 1984 PS 84-67 Replat of Blocks 46R, 48R, Lots lR-5R, Block 20, and Lots lR-5R. Block 49, Foster Village Addition, Section 11 I DEPARTMENT: Plannin~ and Zoning I BACKGROUND: This property is located between Rufe Snow Drive and Meadowview Terrace. on the north side of North Park Drive and both sides of Cross Timbers between North Park Drive I and P.arkwood Drive. I This replat was need in order to realign a street. I I All corrections have been made. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this replat. I. I I I I I I ,I ,.~TY COUNCIL ACTION IlIQUIRED: I IUDC£TED JTat: . YES 110 Approval or denial of replat. x 0Í~ ~~. ~---- - ~ r - .. ~ J" .....~. _' t\ "J'(~ ,c.\,~4' ~Ji':~ ~_Jo'Í~~ .........~""'~~......".... Io[:..~".·~~·..·~..I.._,....-t,.",¡." ";"(".;,',.," "'..:1"·,..·~·,.,,~..~........1.......~~~..,....~...~~ ,.I. ~""1 ..1..'.·t....t..~~:::..,..)¡\{,.o~..:t¡"':~.~,;~:~~""'O:.Y'...~~ .. I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I Page 8 P & Z Minutes July 26, 1984 ( (' ~ PS 84-66 DENIED 4. PS 84-67 Mr. Martin said if they put the street along the west side of the property, they would have to reduce the size of the lots and would have to build a portion of the street on another person's property. He said he di not feel this would be good. MS. Nash asked why they sho three Willow Lanes. Mrs. Calvert stated t have a different n y would have to for each street. Mr. Martin said hey could change that. /' Mr. Bowen~aid there are several lots which s 6w off-set building lines which he Subdivision Ordinance does not llow; the building lines must be t e same. Mr. Martin said they would correct that. Mr. Wood said if they moved Holiday Lane to the west, he felt they would not lose any lots. Mr. Martin said to alige Holiday Lane with Meadow Road, the street would come to the window sill of an existing house. Mr. Wood said there should be some way to change it. He said he has problems with houses opening onto a collector street. Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 84-66 without prejudice. This motion was seconded by Ms~ Nash and tbe motion to deny carried 4-0. Request of Southland Financial Service for replat of Blocks 46R, 48R, Lots lR-5R, Block 20, and Lots lR-5R, Block 49. Foster Village Addition, Section 11. .. ....... ... -t"':' . > .,.,' ..:...' ,~,-:-../'t'o¡··!·71.··:,:"~-·;,":'>~'~ :V:~;'~fi.;:;.·.:.,::~-;:,,,(~.~j:~.:1:~:'./~\'o.;~ ;:-:t'~,~t~:;;d:'!-·"',·":~ I~ I II_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I II I I I_ I Page 9 P & Z Minutes July 26. 1984 PS 84-67 APPROVED 5 PZ 84-52 (" ( Acting Chairman Bowen said since this is a replat in single family zoning. he would 'open the Public Héaring and call for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak in favor of this request. the Acting Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak. the Acting Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood stated all the Engineer's comments have been met. MS. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-67. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Doyne S. Byrd to rezone Lot 3R. Block 23. C1earview Addition. f m its present classification of C- (Commercial) to C-2-Specific e-Sale of Used Autos. This prop y is located on the south s e of Maplewood Drive at Grapevine hway. Bowen opened the ng and called for those speak in favor of this please come forward. yrtis Byrd. 8320 Dude Court. came forward. She showed pictures of the area in question and the area which surrounds this area. Mrs. Byrd said they would like to put~an iron fence around the property to make it look nice. She said she had spoken with two adjacent property owners who stated they did not object to this request. Mrs. Byrd said they had owned the property for several years and had paid taxes on it and now they would like to receive some income from it. " ,-t.,;"', ,..-. . . ...;-....,;:'..,:'-""'"........... ;_~a..'1:';'-":"'d. "',\-", .:"-,: " I ( ESTAeLISHED 1880 /",' r .~ I GAREY W. GILLEY DON W, HICKEY BROOKES BAKER SU RVEYORS A PROF'ESSIONAL CORPORATION C, RICHARD DAVIS, -.JR. erRED .... ...ORRIS I TITLE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING BROOKES BAKER (l902-19!5!5) -.JOHN F". BAKER, CONSULTANT S. -.J, BAKER, CONSULTANT BROOKES BAKER BUILDING -!SII E, BLUF"F" STREET 817- 33!5-71!51 METRO <429-eI19 f"ORT WORTH) TEXAS 76102 I I July 26, 1984 I I Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 I RE: PS 84-67 foster Village, Section 11 I Dear Planning & Zoning Commission Members: I In response to letter dated July 20, 1984 from Mr. Richard Albin, P.E. ~regarding the replat of the above reference property, we offer the . following: I 1. The dedication has been fully executed. 2. Existing zoning is shown on map. 3. Adjacent platting and ownership is shown on map. 4. Property corner monumentation is shown on map. 5. I understand the City Staff has informed the utility com- panies of the replat. 6. The existing utilities already in will be shown ,on an "as built" plan and forwarded to the City. I I I trust that this information satisfies all the comments and ask for I your favorable consideration of approval. Sincerely, I BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS ~~~~~:> Garey W. Gilley II I Ie I GWG:bam I I Ie I I I I I I _Ie I I I I I I I Ie I "'" (~. .... ~ .,. ( Mr. H. W. Raines TESCO Region Engr. Mgr. P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-67 Foster Village Addition, Blocks 46R, 48R, Lots lR-5R, Block 13A, & Lots lR-5R, Block 49 Address or Location: East of Rufe Snow Drive, South side of North Park Drive and both sides of Crdsstimber Lane from North Park Drive to Parkwood Drive. Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than 7/31/84. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. ~' Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: ~aJ ~/ ~ a,-~ ~ U~~~ TESCO: DATE hJ L,.I ~ 5'. /? ~~ f/~ ' rL¡ SIGNATURE~~~ SIGNATURE ~~ (?~ CITY: DATE: July 17, 1984 I' I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I c~ \. (:. J '7- ~ /I..; ~JI F'I. w(J~;H I T~ , UJAAJDA t!~J..LJ¡:M C I '''Y ð F AID. RI-c,.I. J :1 ~ JI,).J.. $ A! C'õJs-e,-M ?.s"ð~-¿'7 i~ s:r4.~~~~ ~~~ ~~~/I/~~V~~~~ . .~~~~~~ '~~¡J~.ø~~ · ~ ~~~~.~ -<-Gdl-u-dL a" ~ ~ß~~~ ci¿¿·~~ "1~~ ~ ',' -;~~~ ~~~~~~~~ {J~~~ ~&d~~~ , ß.R~ ,/.;I!;P~ $-":ã7R ~õ7$ ~o C~· {)~ ~ ~ g;? ~4~~, I I I I I Ie I I I I e (' (" ~, :: KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 20, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-841, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION, BKS. 46R,48R,13A, AND 49 (11), REPLAT, PS 84 - 67, GRID MAP 49 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. 2 The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat. 3 All contiguous platting and/or ownership should be shown on the plat. 4 In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should be noted on the plat. 5 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 6 We would request that utility layout plans be submitted which show the revised location of all water and sewer services in the replatted area. if you RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician July 20, 1984 PS 84 - 67 PAGE 1 !S!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-8211· METRO/267-3367 I I -e ~UBJ£CT : o { ,l I DATE: AU2ust 9. 1984 Appeal Hearing on PZ 84-22 Zonin~ request from Agriculture to R-7-MF on Tract 1AI and ,a portion I of 1A. Thos. Sprouce Survey. Abstract 1399. DEPARTHENT:Plannin~ and Zonin~ IIIACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Bursev Road~ approximatelv e43 Ifeet east of Rufe Snow Drive. IThere were 2 owners contacted 1us a letter was sent IThere was one ~roperty owner who spoke in opposition to this reaQe~t. She was concerned with th~ drainage. She has since sent us a letter stating she and her husband do not I object to the request. I I Planning and Zoning Connnission recómmenðed denial'of' this zoning request. ~ COUNCIL ACTION kEQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. .~ - ¿Í~ {!~ IUDCETED 1Tat: YES 10 y I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I e I l \ r 7012 Bursey Road Fort Worth, Texas 76180 June 6, 1984 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RE: PZ 84-22 Request of Bursey Joint Venture to rezone Tract lAl, Thomas Sprouce Survey, Abstract 1399, from their present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family). This property is located on the south side of Bursey Road and approximately 843 feet east of Rufe Snow Dr. Gentlemen: The above-described item was heard and unanimously denied at the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills on May 10, 1984. I spoke (and in behalf of my husband, Clifford Pearson) against the requested apartment zoning for two reasons: 1. We believed the cons truction of apartments in addition to the already granted commercial zoning for a proposed shopping center would create water runoff on our adjoining property to the east. Our property is located on Bursey Road immediately below the proposed zoning change. 2. Also, we believed that the mere fact that apartments could be located adjacent to our property would lower our property's value significantly. Inasmuch as we have been assured by Doug Long, engineer/developer on ~he apartment project, that every effort will be made to construct quality apartments with adequate green belts for water absorbtion¡ we withdraw our objection to the apartment zoning with one stipulation: That both the property adjacent to the south of our property and the property adjacent to the west of our property (both of which Mr. Long is involved in developing) be considered Very carefully by the City Engineer as to proper drainage. It is our desire now, as then, that any displaced water be channeled property to avoid future problems. If planned adequately, it may be that our property value will be in- creased rather than diminished. In that respect, we certainly have no objection. Thank you for your kind consideration of the appeal before you. Yours~ery trUlY~ 2/£~~ ~~~ Mrs. Verree Pearson Mr. Clifford A. Pearson I, I Ie>· I I I I I I Ie I I I I I CONSIDERATION OF ACTION ON TEXAS UTILITIES ELEC IC COMPANY RAT ASE ORDINANCE O. 1034 APPROV~ /' / // / WHEREAS, the City Council and Staff have made a study of//' this rate schedule and have determined that the fOllow¿::eng . action be taken. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Counçt of the City of North Richland Hills, that: ( ,.... , Mayor Echols advised the Council that this request could be heard July 9, 1984. Councilman Ramsey stated there would be a problem having the hearing on July 9th because there would not be a full Council present. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to set the appeal hearing for August 13, 1984. Motion carried 6-0. ........ .....-~..~ ."'...........--.-.-.. ............ ~ ......... 21. Mr. McEntire presented the following Ordinance: WHEREAS, Texas Utilities Electric Company filed an application for increase in rates with the City of North Richland Hills on March 9, 1984, as shown by the schedule of rates filed on such date; and WHEREAS, such rates was suspended for 90 days for study; and The schedule of rates filed by Texas Util Company on or about March 9, 1984, be and ar things disapproved and denied. ~ ies Electric hereby, in all Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded b approve Ordinance No. 1034. Councilman Ramsey, to Motion carried. 6-0. 22. Mr Line stated that he had orwarded the letter from Lone Star Gas Company to ~ City Council with the recommendation that t City Attorney be asked to indicate whether or not the uncil had any jurisdiction over this matter. Mr. McEntire ated that the Council might want to let the representa ve from Lone Star Gas either at this time or sometime n the future review what the company's current policy as in respect to charges in distances for these exte sions. Mr. McEntire stated the Council might want t now what the cost would be for new customers. Mr. Al Singletary, Representative, Lone Star Gas Company. appeared before the Council. _~_..........-.-...-...._~._,'_"-W.~....- - ............~:.....~~~ June 11, 1984 Page 7 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF BURSEY JOINT VENTURE FOR AN APPEAL HEARING ON PZ 84-22 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF LONE STAR GAS COMPANY - CHARGES FOR MAIN EXTENSIONS POSTPONED I· I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I _ Page 2 P & Z Minutes May 10, 1984 3. PZ 84-22 (' ~ Request of Bursey Joint Venture to rezone Tract lAl & a portion of Tract lA, Thomas Sprouce Survey, Abstract 1399, from their present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family). This property is located on the south side of Bursey Road and approximately 843 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Owen D. Long, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He said this is the first request for this classification in the new zoning ordinance which requires site plan approval. Mr. Long said he hoped they had provided all the information the Commission needed. He said their site plan exceeds the minimum requirements. Mr. Long said this property is adjacent to commercial zoning and is north of Southland Corporation's property who sent a letter of approval. Chairman Tucker asked if the complex would empty onto Bursey Road. Mr. Long said it would, but they are extending Crosstimbers which follows a double gas line. He said they might want to swing this road a little farther to the side. Mr. Long said they had problems with the sewer and the reason for putting the sewer where they did was the crest of the hill. Mr. Long stated they have the parking and lighting directed internally so they would not be too close to the adjacent property owners. Mr. Wood asked if they plan to dedicate enough right-of-way for the widening of Bursey Road. ·1, I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I _ Page 3 P & Z Minutes May 10, 1984 ~ ~ Mr. Long said they would. He stated they would be constructing their half of Bursey Road. Mr. Schwinger asked if they plan to dump 300 cars onto Bursey Road with this development. Mr. Long said they plan to develop the commercial to the west in conjunction with this tract. He said there are plans for Bursey Road to go west to Highway 377 and Crosstimbers will be a 37 foot collector street to Hightower Drive. Mr. Long said people going to work would use Bursey and Rufe Snow. Mr. Long said there are plans to develop the property to the south of this property at a later date and also there is a church interested in purchasing the property to the east of this property. Mr. Long said they would like to develop the commercial and apartments at the same time. He said this is sort of like a Planned Development; if they had to change any elevations, they would have to come back for another site approval. Mr. Long said they already have someone who is interested in developing this property and they are working on the engineering now. Mr. Wood said he agreed with having the commercial to the west, but he did not feel this property was ideal for Multi-Family. He said apartments should be located on major thoroughfares. Mr. Long said Bursey Road is planned for a major thoroughfare. Mr. Wood said that will not be for several years. Mr. Long said the City of Watauga's plans are for it to go to Highway 377. I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 4 P & Z Minutes May 10, 1984 PZ 84-22 D~Irn ( ( Mr. Long said they considered duplexes on this site, but they feel the apartments would have more amenities. He said there would not be as much open space with duplexes. Mr. Long said they will build half of Bursey Road which would probably be 60 feet for their half. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Verree Pearson, 7012 Bursey Road, came forward. She said she owns 25 acres adjacent to this property on the east which is separated by a wooden fence. Ms. Pearson said there are three existing homes and their property circles around them to Douglas Lane. She said if apartments are built on this property, it would limit 'their use of their land. Ms. Pearson stated they had a drainage problem. She said the commercial area is on top of a hill and all the rain drains down to their property and with this apartment complex with all the cement, their property would flood. Ms. Pearson said they object to the apartment zoning. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen stated he agrees with Mr. Wood that this is not the best use of this property at this time and he made the motion to deny PZ 84-22. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion to deny carried 5-0. Page 12 P & Z Minutes ,. March 22, 1984 (' J' I_ I I I I I I f-._ I I PZ 84-21 I APPROVED I 15. PZ 84-22 I (" Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request please come forward. Owen D. Long came forward. this is a 30 acre tract requesting approximate commercial and 7~ ac s for R-7-MF. Mr. Long said the operty to the west is commercial, the north is commercial, t Mill~r Property to the south is L al Retail and Southland Corporat n property is single family. He sa this would be a good tax base for orth Richland Hills. Long showed the Commission some sketches they have made of the property. Councilman Davis said they have a letter from Jim Harris with Southland Corporation stating they were in favor of this request. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 84-21. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Bursey Joint Venture to rezone Tract 1A1 and a portion of Tract lA, Thomas Sprouce Survey, Abstract 1399, from their present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family). This property is located on the south side of Bursey Road and approximately 843 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. . ,;:"-~'~'. "~f "-":~""~>'.i1'.""""~ ~f"·· .,.p:"~~-'; ~"':C-~'" . I I (' e I I I 11' I 1_( I I, I I I . ~;~ '. ~ . t~',!':,. ' ~: " ' ,",' ..,' '. ~' ;::::i::: .'::;-:-' '" ff~·.', ~~',~ : "~·,(ri4. :. ~~~$ .,.,," '~, Page 13 P & Z Minutes March 22. 1984 RECESS f'~' ( Chairman Tucker said he felt this request should be tabled because they did not submit all the requirements for this zoning classification. He read the requirements from the Zoning Ordinance 11080. PZ 84-22 TABLED MS. Nash made the motion to table PZ 84-22 until such time all criteria are submitted. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Long asked if a site plan was sufficient. Chairman Tucker said they could not deviate 100% from the plan. Chairman Tucker called a recess at 8:50 P. M. BACK TO ORDER Chairman Tucker called the meet in back to order at 9:00 P. M. same members present. Request of Northeast struction to rezone portions of ocks 20, 25, 26, 27, & 33, Holid est Addition, from their presen lassification of R-3 (Single F 1y) to a proposed classif ation of R-4-SD (Separate Owne ip Duplex). This property is 1 ated on both sides of Cancun Drive rom Sierra Drive southward to Buenos Aires Drive. 16. PZ 84-23 Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. J. B. Sandlin came forward. He said the lots to the west and north of this property are already zoned for duplexes. He said there are 179'lots zoned R-3 to the east. Mr. Sandlin said there are two streets for outlets for the traffic which would go out to Rufe Snow. ..T-: . . . '.~>.;;' I I Ie f· r- SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. P. O. BOX 470337 . FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76147 ' 901 SUMMIT AVENUE . (817) 334-0686 JAMES R. HARRIS, JR. VICE PRESIDENT I I I I March 19, 1984 Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Ie I I I I I ~~- I Ie I Re: PZ 84-21 84-22 Tracts lA2, 1A3 & 1A Thomas Sprouce Survey Abstract #1399 Dear Sir: I am writing you to support PZ84-2l & 22, rezoning the southeast corner of Bursey Road and Rufe Snow Road from agricultural to commercial and multi-family. As the owner and developer of Foster Village which borders the subject property on the south, we feel the intersection of Bursey and Rufe Snow will be a prime commercial corner in the near future. The growing population of this area will need a convenient shopping a service center in its midst without the necessity of driving far to the south. There is no question that the other three corners which are in Keller and Watauga will be co~ rical and multi-family. Let's keep some of the tax revenue in North ichland Hills. Very ,:7 Harris, Jr. JRH:ga I- II I I I I I I I I_ I I I ( r KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas March 13, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-21Â 22 REVIEW lETTER, AGRICULTURE TO C-l AND R-7-MF REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 40 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. I RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician _ I March 13, 1984 PZ 84-21, 22 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I I f I I I I I I Ie I I I . '\ " {) ORDINANCE NO. jl tl ~ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS , PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-22 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to R-7-MF (Multi-Family). BEING a tract of land out of the Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399 in Tarrant County, Texas, and being a part of the same tract of land recorded in Volume 2072, Page 528, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin in the south line of Bursey Road (County Road No. 4093), said iron pin is 30 feet south and 1475.43 feet west from the northeast corner of said survey; THENCE South 923.93 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 00 minutes 34 seconds West 353.13 feet; THENCE North 8 degrees 52 minutes 11 seconds West 694.5 feet; THENCE East 260.0 feet; THENCE North 250.0 feet; THENCE East 200.0 feet to the place of beginning and containing 7.5 acres of land, more or less. I I f I I I I I I Page 2 This property is located on the south side of Bursey Road, approximately 843 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 10th DAY OF MAY, 1984. 61~ c. ~~ CHAIRMAN LANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ?7 .- ~,. ~- ~ ttI'! ~ .' .. . ~",,17 ...... ..,'.' ",/, ~ /::.,.;;.~;,-., ¿,: ';-' ~.~. "-.-' I _ Þ ( d- ING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-22 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF _ I I I MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I I_ I I" . 1 e IU!JECT: c' c' , , ~ DATE: August 9, 1984 PZ 84-45 Appeal Hearing on ZoninR reQuest from A2riculture to R-S-D on Tra~t ~I ' T ~ ~~~nm~Q 1 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning ItACKCROUND: This property is located on the west side of Smithfield Road. bounded on the west by Hewitt Street, and is approximately 550 feet north of Chapman Road. I Survey, Abstract 1040. here were 15 property owners contacted osition to the re uest. The ere all concerned with the drainaRe in this area. 1 The dev~loper states he lans to correct the draina e roblem if he receives this zonin hange and-the next case, PZ 84-44. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of this zoning request by a vote of '-1 ',I I 'I I ~ with Mr. Wood voting against denial. \Y COUNCIL ACTION IIQUIJlED: Approval or denial of zonin¡ r~Qtt~~t JTDf: YES 10 x ~~,(?~ I·' I 'I_ II II I I II I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I Page 8 p & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 8. PZ 84-45 ( ( Request of JONCO Development Company to rezone Tract 3, J. C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-5-D (Duplex). This property is located on the west side of Smithfield Road, bounded on the west by Hewitt Street, and approximately 550 feet north of Chapman Road. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. John Cook came forward to represent his JONCO Development Company. He said he understands there is a drainage problem in this area, but he plans to correct that. He said he had discussed this with the City Engineer and he said it would take a 60 inch line from the bridge to Chapman Road. Mr. Cook said the cost to do this is almost prohibitive. He said that is the reason he has requested the duplex zoning for this tract. Mr. Cook said if he could work with the property owners, he could take the bend out and take it straight to Chapman; if not, he may have to put it at an angle. Mr. Cook said along Hewitt Street, there are large drainage ditches, but small culverts which are about 1,000 feet from Chapman Road. He said he would like to bring Hewitt Street straight south to Chapman Road. He said he had contacted adjacent property owners. Chairman Tucker asked if he felt this would help the drainage on Mabell Street. Mr. Cook said it would if larger culverts are put in. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I,,' . ( Page 9 ( P & Z Minutes I June 14, 1984 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (" J. D. Richmond, Jr. 6737 Hewitt Street, came forward. He said the drainage in this area has been studied for 19 years, but never fixed. He said if you put any deeper ditches than is already there, someone is going to drive off and drown. Mr. Richmond said the road gets covered up as deep as 18 inches when it rains. He said if it comes a good hard rain, you can not build ditches large enough to handle the water. Mr. Richmond said he does not desire to have duplexes across the street from him. William Gideon, 7717 Chapman Road, came forward. He said they had no problem with the water until houses were built around them. He said he had seen the water 3 or 4 feet, not 18 inches. He said if you go in there and build apartment houses, you will have real serious problems. Mr. Gideon said they have already laid too much concrete now. He said there needs to be a way to get the water from the elbow in Hewitt to Chapman Road. Marvin Miller, 6717 Hewitt Street, came forward. He said the drainage ditch goes behind his property. He said nothing has ever been done about the drainage. Mr. Miller said one culvert on the east side of Hewitt Street which is 36 inches deep and 12 feet wide, 36 square feet, would not even carry the volume of water. He said if water runs on grass and weeds, it will be absorbed, but more concrete will increase the drainage problem. Mr. Miller said as far as the duplex zoning, he did not know they were asking for it. Mike Dean, 6725 Hewitt Street, came forward. He said there was wrong information as to the location. I, ' ~ Page 10 ( P & Z Minutes I June 14, 1984 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mrs. Calvert stated there was a sign on the property stating they were requesting a zoning change. Mr. Dean said he had seen 18 inches of water in the street in front of his house. He said he has a 50 feet wide and 18 inch deep berm to keep the water out. Mr. Dean said he is opposed to the development of this property due to the drainage. He said when the water hits Chapman Road, it has to make a 90 degree turn down Chapman. Mr. Dean said his house almost flooded because a trash can had stopped up the culvert. Mr. Dean said he is opposed to this request because of the streets. He said North Richland Hills has the worst streets around. He said there is already congested traffic at Smithfield Road and Davis Boulevard and at Main Street and Davis Boulevard. Mr. Dean said he was not in favor of duplexes; he does not like rental property. He said he would not be in favor of residential either because he likes the open area. Mr. Dean asked what they could do to stop this development. Chairman Tucker said if he could get a petition with signatures of 20% of the property owners within 200 feet of this property, then it would take a three-fourths majority of the City Council voting affirmative to pass it. Mr. Bowen said if this request is approved, it would go to the City Council on the 9th of July, but if denied by P & Z, Mr. Cook would have to request an Appeal Hearing. Mr. Dean said if the Commission would come out to this area, they would know that a 5 foot drainage system would not take care of it. I· ' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I 'I I I I I I Ie I ~ Page 11 P & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 ( ( Chairman Tucker said to not consider the 5 feet because the developer would have to put in whatever the City Engineer says it would take to carry the drainage. He said this Commission must decide the best use of this land and the only way there can be improvements made, the city must rely on the developer to provide it. Chairman Tucker said this Commission takes a hard look at the platting of a piece of property. He said they must satisfy both the City Engineer and this Commission. Chairman Tucker said it would be from 30 to 60 days before they could come back to the Planning and Zoning Commission with the platting. Mike Thompson, 6704 Habell, came forward. He said he was opposed to duplexes. He said the City Engineer may look at the platting, but someone allowed Marvin Smith to build his house several inches below the curb. Mr. Thompson said there are small culverts and the water can not get across Chapman Road and the water backs up and someone is going to sue someone one of these days. Ed Pruitt came forward. He said he lives at 6709 Mabell and owns 6717 Mabell and he is in opposition to this request. Charles Cundiff, 6721 Mabell, came forward. He said he is opposed to this request. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hannon said he would like to make it clear that the drainage problem is different than zoning. He said the drainage will be considered at the time of platting. Mr. Hannon said 5 people have been opposed to this request because of the type zoning. He said he feels Chapman Road should be the boundary for duplex zoning and does not feel it should be allowed at this time. I· ' . ., I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I I Page 12 P & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 (' PZ 84-45 DENIED RECESS BACK TO ORDER 9. PZ 84-46 ( Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 84-45. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion to deny carried 4-1 with Mr. Wood voting against denial. Chairman Tucker called a recess at 8:40 P. M. Chairman Tucker called back to order with the present. Request of portion of Tract lA1A, Jo Survey, Abstract 310, f m its present classificatio of AG (Agriculture) to R- (Single Family). This property is cated on the east side of Douglas ane and approximately 649 feet sout of Bursey Road. Chairman cker opened the Public Hearing nd called for those wishing to sp in favor of this request to pIe e come forward. elbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Roberts. He said they wish to build two houses on the property and need to rezone. Chairman Tucker asked if Mr. Roberts owns the tracts around this property. Mr. Stembridge said he owns Tract 1. He said Mr. Roberts has some relatives who wish to purchase some of his property to build homes on. Ms. Nash asked if the 20 feet shown on the plat was all the property he has to get to his house. Mr. Stembridge said it was. Mr. Hannon asked how many acres will Mr. Roberts have left. Mr. Stembridge said 2~ or 3 acres. I- II Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 31, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-45 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-5-D REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 78 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. WI RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician May 31, 1984 PZ 84-45 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXÁS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 " I ~. Ie I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I · 'OJ(' . .'" ic ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-45 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to R-5-D (Duplex). The following described tract or parcel of land situated in the John McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, Tarrant County Texas and being a portion of a tract as recorded on Page 443 of Volume 1211 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a fence corner in the West line of Smithfield Road and being South 89 degrees 24 minutes West a distance of 27.0 feet and North 00 degrees 10 minutes West a distance of 760.83 feet from the Southeast corner of said John McComas Survey; THENCE West, at a distance of 196.42 feet an old iron rod at the Northeast corner of a 2.58 acre tract as recorded on Page 816 of Volume 5651 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and at a distance of 392.34 feet an old iron rod at the Northeast corner of a 2.5 acre tract as recorded on Page 303 of Volume 2476 in the Tarrant County Deed Records, a total distance of 950.0 feet to an iron rod in the East line of Hewitt Street; THENCE North 00 degrees 26 minutes 40 seconds East along the East line of said Hewitt Street and generally along a fence a distance of 267.44 feet to a fence corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds East generally along a fence a distance of 947.15 feet to a fence corner in the West line of said Smithfield Road and being South 00 degrees 10 minutes East a,distance of 79.0 feet from an old iron rod at the Southeast corner of a tract conveyed to Helen Alread by deed recorded on Page 7 of Volume 4042 in the Tarrant County Deed Records; THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes East along the West line of Smithfield Road a distance of 272.42 feet to the place of beginning and containing 5.878 acres or 256,041 square feet of land. I· · Ie I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ II Page 2 This property is located on the west side of Smithfield Road, bounded on the west by Hewitt Street, and approximately 550 feet north of Chapman Road. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF JUNE, 1984. ¿£J~ c ~~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~' .~~G£-~ SECRETARY P:zt~iT--zoNING ~l~~J.Ol(¡--- BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84~45 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS II I -e ISUBJEcT: I; \ -' DATE: August 9, 1984 PZ 84-44 Zoning request from Agriculture to R-3 on Tracts 4A, 4C3. and 4D. I DEPARTMENT: I BACKGROUND: J. C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040. Planning and Zoning This property is located on the north side of Chapman Road, bounded on the I west by McComas Addition, and a portion is bounded on the east by Hewitt Street. IThere were 28 ~roperty owners contacted and 2 spoke in opposition to the request. They were concerned with the drainage problem in the area and they just wanted it to stay I agr !cuI tur e · liThe Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. Ie I I I I I I I __TY I COUNCIL ACTION kEQUIIlED: Approval or denial of zonin~ reQuest. IlTDCETED 1TOt: YES 10 X -2/~ {?~ -. I I Ie I I I II I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (' ( August 6. 1984 Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills Re: PZ 84-44 - Zoning request for Tracts 4A. 4C3, & 4D, J.C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040 Dear Mayor & City Council: We are the owners of one of the above referenced tracts, Tract 4C3, J.C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, and do hereby give John Cook permission to request this zoning change with the following stipulations: If development of this project is not started within twelve (12) months from the date of approval of this zoning change, that our property , Tract 4C3. revert back to AG (Agriculture); AND That Tract 4C3 be allowed to be used for agricultural purposes until such time development is started. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. ~Cer~lY r f,.l ~ ' / .~ ,,,,-i é ¡z&¿ ~~ ~ cI~ (}0.1..~ Billy B. & Wanda Calvert 6721 Hewitt Street North Richland Hills, TX 76180 cc: John Cook I, II Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 6 P & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 7. PZ 84-44 (' ('" .,';"" Request of John Cook to rezone Tracts 4A, 4C3, & 4D, J. C. McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family). This property is located on the north side of Chapman Road, bounded on the west by McComas Addition, and a portion is bounded on the east by Hewitt Street. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mike Thompson, 6704 Mabell Street, came forward. He asked if they plan to build houses or duplexes. Chairman Tucker said they would be houses like Mr. Thompson's addition. Mr. Thompson stated there is a drainage problem in this area. Chairman Tucker stated that would be addressed when the property is platted. Mr. Thompson asked how he could be sure they make the proper drainage. Chairman Tucker said for him to keep in touch with Mrs. Calvert in the Planning and Zoning department. Mr. Hannon stated it takes about 3 months for the platting process. Mr. Bowen stated that the R-3 zoning classification requires a minimum of 1,400 square foot homes: Mark Fuller, 6708 Mabell Street, came forward. He said he was concerned that the "quiet" of the area would change. Mr. Fuller said he would not object to the change, but he would like to see it tied to providing adequate drainage. He said they have ditches dug from their property to this property to drain their back yards. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 7 P & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 PZ 84-44 APPROVED ( ( Mr. Wood said Mr. Cook will have to take care of the drainage on his property, but he cannot be held responsible for their drainage problems. Mr. Hannon said this Commission has to decide if this request is the best use of the land. He said if the zoning request is approved, Mr. Cook will have to come back before this Commission for platting approval. Mr. Hannon said the City has special engineering guidelines on what to do with the drainage, the streets, how close they are, etc. He said if all the City's requirements are not met, his plat will not be approved. Mr. Hannon said if the zoning is approved, it might be 20 years before it could be developed. Mr. Fuller said he might solve the drainage on this property, but create one on the adjacent property. Mr. Fuller said he was against the zoning change, he would rather it stay Agriculture. Mike Dean, 6725 Hewitt Street, came forward. He said he was against this zoning request. Mr. Dean said there is an open drainage ditch and drainage problems which was to be fixed in the approved bond issue, but understand it has been cancelled. He said they did not have a drainage problem until the property was developed around them. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood stated this request is for zoning, but the drainage problem will have to be taken care of if and when it gets to the platting. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PZ 84-44. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. I II Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I il_ I (" ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 31, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 84-44 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-3 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 78 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. r~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician May 31, 1984 PZ 84 -44 PAGE 1 !5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I r' · Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-44 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-3. SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and being a 6.84 acre tract of land out of the J. C. McCommas Survey, Abstract Number 1040, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin 1235.90 feet South 89 degrees 46 minutes East, and 36.5 feet North 00 degrees 15 minutes East, from the Southwest corner of said McComas Survey, said point being the North line of Chapman Road; THENCE North 00 degrees 15 minutes East, a distance of 722.25 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 50 minutes East, a distance of 425.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 15 minutes West, a distance of 117.50 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 05 degrees 34 minutes West, a distance of 89.50 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 01 degrees 31 minutes East, a distance of 515.00 feet to a point for corner in the North R.O.W. line of Chapman Road; THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes West, along the North R.O.W. line of Chapman Road for a distance of 433.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 6.84 acres of land more or less. I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located on the North side of Chapman Road, bounded on the West by McComas Addition, and a portion is bounded on the East by' Hewitt Street. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. ~~~ c ~~~~ CHAIRMAN--í1ÍiÑNING Z . - IN'G COMMISSION ~f)-~ GP ~ ~ ING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-44 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF 1984.. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I- I e . 'UBJECT: J:;- I' DATE: August 9. 1984 PZ 84-42 Zoning request to change MF-PD in Ordinance fll033 if used·' for I DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning IIACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Northeast LOQD 820. ~~s~ gf Rufe Snow Drive, and bounded on " the south by the TESCO ri2ht-of-wav. I church. ere were 78 property owner contacted the same one's who were t request for the Planned Development. There was only one who snoke in opposition. H~ was loncerned with traffic in the area. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this reauest with the followin~ 1. t~e MF be changed to U-PD; 2. the turn around be deleted: 3. the masonry the one-way rèquirement for Colonial Parkway be under construction Drior o granting a certificate of occupancy; 6. the street be a minimum of 48 feet of 68 foot right-of-way. I I I I I ~I ;__~ COUNCIL ACTION IlIQUIUD: Approval or denia~-, ~f ël IDDCETD JTDt: T øqn ø:Q~ IES 110 x -2/~rY~ - c ~ ......- , - , ' .. .. . .J. .....~ ;....<I.!.:;...,....~ ~ ... " ~ ..... _~ '" . ¡,;~ r 1').1 ~~..'~I ~. _:..:.". ~.. t_.... I ". ~ .1 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PZ 84-42 c (; MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS JUNE 21, 1984 - 7:30 P. M. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, George T~c~er, at 7:35 P. M. PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members George Tucker Marjorie Nash Don Bowen Mark Hannon John Schwinger Alt. Member Councilwoman p & Z Coordinator Virginia Moody Wanda Calvert ABSENT: Mark Wood Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ for a change in the Multi-Family Planned Development zoning in Ordinance 11033 to read: if church related uses are constructed on the property, tbe requirement for a turn around bridge over Loop 820 and the masonry wall abutting the single family to the south will be waived. If any part of the 53.8861 acre tract is developed as Multi-Family, the original stipulations on Ordinance #1033 will apply. This property is located on the south side of Northeast Loop 820, west of Rufe Snow Drive, and bounded on the south by the TESCO right-of-way. Chairman Tucker said before he opened the Public Hearing he wanted to know 1f the applicant wished to continue the hearing of the case or did they wish to withdraw. He said Ordinance I- 11033 was approved June 13, 1983 and adopted as a Planned Development with some as single family, some condos, and 53.8 acres as Multi-Family. Chairman Tucker stated 1f the 53.8 acres were used for church uses, that would take the multi-family out of the neighborhood which he feels the neighbors would rather have. ,,/ / / /' I '. · I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 P & Z Minutes June 21, 1984 c: .~ Chairman Tucker said 1f this happ~ns, there probably would be no need for the turn around and the masonry screen, but in order to protect the citizens of Meadow ~ak~s, the owner of the property, and the church, this Commission would need to strike out , some of the restrictions and give the 'church the proper zoning which would be U-PD. Chairman Tucker said if they take the restrictions off this portion, the developer can go ahead and do what he wishes with the balance .pf the Planned 'pevelopment. He said the Commission does feel they must put -in the street. The representative of the church said they wished to continue. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Bob Hamm came forwàrd' to represent the church. He said Chairman Tucker had expressed their desires and it sounded good to them. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request or if any wished to just'ask questions to please come forward. Larry Smith, 5005 Skylark, came forward. He asked if the roadway from Meadow Lakes Drive would still be required to be' one-way. Chairman Tucker said it should go both I. ways. He said it would be of help to people coming from the east to go past the Rufe Snow exit and go across and back up to Meadow Lakes. Chairman Tucker said the Commission will have the turn around in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Smith said he felt there might be a need to have a study made regarding signalization of Meadow Lakes Drive and Rufe Snow. I .,. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 p & Z Minutes June 21. 1984 PZ 84-42 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT c C· Mr. Smith said when they put the road through. would the speed limit stay the same on Meadow Lakes? Chairman Tucker said it would. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Tucker said he felt most citizens would rather have the church there than multi-family and it would give the church a nice piece of property. He said if the Commission puts it under a Planned Development, they can plan as they go and the Commission would help in their planning. Chairman Tucker said the street is a major concern of the Planning and Zoning Commission because of the congestion at Rufe Snow. He said they might be able to get help from the State for a bridge and a ramp someday, but the street would give passage to the freeway. Mr. Hannon made the motion that Ordinance 11033 be amended as follows: 1. the MF be changed to U-PD; 2. the turn around be deleted; 3. the masonry wall be deleted; 4. the one-way requirement for Colonial Parkway be deleted; 5. Colonial Parkway be under construction prior to any construction of the church or the condos and be finished prior to granting a certificate of occupancy; 6. the street be a minimum of 48 feet of ' pavement or 68 foot R.O.W. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen ~ and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Tucker stated this would be heard by the City Council on July 9th. The meeting adjourned at 1:50 P. M. CHAIRMAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Iv' Page 3 p & Z Minutes June 14, 1984 r" \:):: .: '~ . C· There being no one w1shin Chairman Tucker closed e Hearing. Ie I I I I I I ,Ie I I Mr. Fenimore said that was correct. Chairman Tucker called f or those ' wishing to speak in opposition to request to please come forward. ·Mr. Hannon said is would be a 1,000 foot finger 0 Commercial in a residentia area. He said there is duplex zing on the east side and. only or 5 lots abut Commercial zo g. Mr. Hannon said he does not el it would present a problem if it stayed residential. Mr. Wood said there are office buildings joining this property and he does not see a problem with this request and he is in favor of the request. Chairman Tucker said since this would be just a strip center. the difference in traffic would not present much of a problem. PZ 84-41 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 84-41 as requested. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 3-2 with MS. Nash and 'Mr. Hannon voting against. 5. PZ 84-42 Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ for confirmation 'of the R-7-MF zoning in Ordinance #,1033. This property. is located on the south side of Northeast Loop 820, west of Rufe .Sno~ Drive, and bounded on the south , by the TESCO right-of-waý. I I I I Ie I This case was withdrawn until June 21, 1984. ,I" I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I "'0:. \U:/~, c' KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas .' ,,' May 31, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-0021 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PI 84-42 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-7-MF TO CLARIFICATION REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 128 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for 'updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. Wf , P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works~ Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician May 31, 1984 PZ 84-42 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 · 817/283-8211 · METR0/287-3387 I ~' II Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I ,Ii ORD INANCE NO. ¡ l Lf1 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS , PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-42 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-MF-PD to U-PD with the following stipulations: 1. The Multi-Family classification be changed to U (School, Church, and Institution District); The turn around requirement be deleted; The masonry wall requirement be deleted; The one-way requirement for Colonial Parkway be deleted; That Colonial Parkway be under construction prior to any construction of the church or the condos and be finished prior to granting a certificate of occupancy; The street be a minimum of 48 feet of pavement ~ 68 foot R.O.W. 2. ...,..,._-q" '~ ," . 5. 6. BEING a tract of land in Tarrant County, Texas out of the T. Akers Survey, Abstract 19, and the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, and the R.P. Barton Survey, Abstract 175, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod for corner in the south line-of Interstate Loop 820- (350-foot R.O.W.) and the east line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad (100,.foot R.O.W.); THENCE North 89 degrees 03 minutes 57 seconds East, along the south line of said Loop 820, a distance of 2595.37 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 11 minutes 09 seconds East, l~aving south line of said Loop 820, a distance of 254.82 feet to an iron rod for corner; said point lying on the north line of the TESCO easement (a 75 foot easement) as recorded in Volume 2868, Page 449 of Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 65 degrees 37 minutes 06 seconds West, with said north line of TESCO easement, a distance of 390.93 feet to an iron rod for an angle point; THENCE South 71 degrees 58 minutes 07 seconds West, with said north line of TESCO easement, a distance of 1808.'96 feet to an iron rod for corner; said point being on a non-tangent curve to the right, said curve having a central angle of 05 degrees 07 minutes 36 seconds, a radius of 1009.79 feet, a tangent length of 45.21 feet, and a tangent bearing of North 13 degrees 16 minutes 06 seconds East; I I .' I I- I I I I I I -- I I I I I Page 2 THENCE along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 90.35 feet to the south line of the TESCO easement; THENCE South 71 degrees 58 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 1141.44 feet along said south line of TESCO easement to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 02 degrees 27 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of 41.54 feet to the centerline of said TESCO easement to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 42 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 255.49 feet to the south line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad; said point also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a central angel of 16 degrees 25 minutes 51 seconds, a radius of 1702.95 feet, a chord bearing of North 38 degrees 57 minutes 57 seconds East, and a chord distance of 486.69 feet; THENCE in a northeasterly direction along the south line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad along said non-tangent curve to the left, an arc distance of 488.36 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; THENCE North 30 degrees 45 minutes 01 seconds East, a distance of 892.16 feet to the point of beginning and containing 53.8861 acres of land. This property is located on the south side of Northeast Loop 820, west of Rufe Snow Drive, and bounded on the south by the TESCO right-of-way.. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 21st DAY OF JUNE, 1984. CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-42 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: ~ Ie I JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I, II -e I SUBJECT: 1 \1 DATE: August 9, 1984 PZ 84-54 Zoning Request from R-7-MF to C-2 on Tract 4R1, A.G. Walker Survevp I Abstract 1630. DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning I BACKGROUND: This property is located on the east side of Florv Street ~ approximatelv 450 feet north of Harmonson Road. I I There were 9 property owners contacted and one spoke in opposition to th~ request. I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zonin2 reauest. I Ie I I 2,1 I I I I flY COUNCIL ACTION lEQUIJlED: Approval or denial of zoning reguest. ;1 r~l.tJI)C£Tm ItÐl: ~~'G~ ' YES 110 X ., -' '-"- - .2: ..'......... _ L ... f' ~ ::.: " . -" _ .-". \I' f ',!~ Page 4 P & Z Minutes July 12, 1984 G Ie I I I I I I Ie 10. PZ 84-54 I I I I I I I Ie I C' Acting Chairman Bowen said after checking the zoning map, the Commission has come to the co usion that this property is air y. 1-2 and this request is not n ssary. Kirk Nance wi &,W Investments came forward. stated he approached the City ncil for a permit to build a s and was granted the permit, but as told to come back before Planning and Zoning to see if there was a problem with the zoning. Ms. Nash said the zoning map was approved January 9, 1984 which shows 1-2 for this property. MS. Nash made a motion that there would be no need for this zoning request. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Bill Marcom to rezone Tract 4R1, A. G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630, from its present classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located on the east side of Flory Street and approximately 450 feet north of Harmonson Road. Acting Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Bob Brady, Real Estate Broker and agend for Mr. Marcom, came forward. He said he was asking for the change from Multi-Family to C-2 because this property is unuseable as Multi-Family, it is too small. He said it was only 100 feet by 353 feet.· Mr. Brady said this area is in transition from Single Family to Business. He said this is not being zoned fqr speculation, the owner plans to build an office warehouse and storage building. I: · ,.'" I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I Page 5 P & Z Minutes July 12. 1984 ç' ('". Mr. Brady said there could be as many as 12 residents. He said the owner would have his office there and his Subcontractors and some wholesalers. Mr,. Brady said there would be' no provision for outside storage. He said some tenants would fit in C-l. but would need addit~onal storage. Mr. Brady said he has discussed this zoning change with the adjacent property owners and none opposed it, but there are some present tonight. Mr. Barron, 801 Erwin Drive. Hurst. Texas, came forward. He said he bought 3936 Flory Street and the property in question is across the street. Mr. Barron said he would like to know what type of commercial or industrial building he plans to build. He said he bought his property with the intent to restore the house and live there. Mr. Brady said it would be offices and warehouse. Mr. Wood said he has C-2 on the other side of his property. Mr. Barron said he has Mr. Allison on one side. He asked if this zoning would affect his property. Acting Chairman Bowen said he would be the only one who could request a zoning change on his property. Acting Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request 'to please come forward. Carroll Birdwell, 3921 F~ory Street, came forward. She said she does·not want it rezoned. She said she lives across the street and can look out her window and sees Allison over there tearing up the road. . t" '...., II Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I I Page 6 P & Z Minutes July 12, 1984 c (' . ~ Acting Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hannon said he' understands there is concern when one asks for a heavier usage, but he feels this is the appropriate zoning for this area. MS. Nash said she agreed with Mr. Hannon. PZ 84-54 APPROVED Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PZ 84-54. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 11. PZ 84-55 Request of Burk Collins Investments-, Inc. to rezone Blocks 1 & 2, Fox Hollow Addition, from their presen classification of R-3 (Single Fa ly) to R-5-D (Duplex). This prop ty is located north of Watauga Ro , bounded on the south by the rail ad and on the west by North Par states. en opened the Public Hearin nd called for those eak in favor of this please come forward. Burk ollins came forward. He said he w requesting the change from R-3 to uplex for a higher yield. He said there had been flooding problems in this area and he has corrected most of it. Mr. Collins said he had built 1,500 foot concrete lined channel and would build another 500 feet. He said this' is very expensive and if he could .get this zoning, it would help with this added expense. Mr. Wood asked how he plans to get access to this subdivision. Mr. Collins said he and Doug Long plan to build a road to Watauga Road. Acting Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. , I ~ ~ · · I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I ~~ I c KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 10. 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills. Texas 76118 RE: 3-0021 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PI 84-54 REVIEW LETTER. ZONING FROM R-7-MF TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 148 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. , RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line. City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assistant Director of Public Works: Mr. Greg Wheeler. Engineering Technician July 10. 1984 PZ 84-54 PAGE 1 ISBO F,IRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 .817/283-8211 · METRO/287-33fS7 I' II Ie I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I C)' ORDINANCE NO. Ii ~/ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE 11080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 ; AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-54 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-MF to C-2. BEING a tract of land out of the A. G. Walker Survey, and described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod 834.5 feet East of and 640.7 feet South of the Northwest corner of the A. G. Walker Survey, said point lying within the Will Sn~e property; THENCE South 100.0 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE West 354.1 feet to an iron rod for corner in the East line of Linda Lane, the West line of the Snow property; THENCE North 00 degrees 06 minutes 53 seconds East with the said line of said lane 100.0 feet to iron rod for corner; THENCE East 353.9 feet to the point of beginning, and containing 0.8 acres of land more or less, being the same land described in a certain warranty deed from W. L. Anglin and wife, Juanita Anglin, to Milton Charles Cranfill and wife, Dorothy J. Cranfill, dated January 31, 1946, recorded in Volume 1765, Page 80 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. , - . ~ ~ ....... .. ~ ~.l., 'II: C t.......~:....... ~J..... :.... .'tt~....:~~ '" ~ I '. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 ',9. " V \ This property is located on the east side of Flory Street and approx~ately 450 feet north of Harmonson Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 12th DAY OF JULY, 1984. .,; "-~ ¿;J~ C. ~Y' CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7?J .~~ Gf: ~~ SECRETARY P~NG AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-84-54 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF 1984. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I. I -e IsUBJECT: . J. t &ì i ¡ ¡ DATE: August 9, 1984 PZ 84-55 Zoning Request from R-3 to R-S-D on Blocks 1 & 2. Fox Hollow Aññi~ion. I DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning ~ACKGROUND: This property is located north of Watauga Road, bounded on the south bv the railroad and on the west by North Park Estates. I here were 30 property osition to the request. I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 4-1 ~ith MS~ Nash voting against. --- I I I I I I I I_Y COUNCIL ACTION IlEQUIu:D: Approval or denia~~ of zoninß reQuest. I IUDCETED 1TOt: YES 110 x .¿Í~ ()~. ·,,<>,1 ,Ct.".":" , I. II Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .- Page 6 p & Z Minutes July 12, 1984 (" 11. PZ 84-55 (' Acting Chairman Public Hearing. Mr. Hannon said erstands there is concern w one asks for 'a heavier usage, e feels this is the a priate zoning for this area. MS. Nash said she agreed with Mr. Hannon. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PZ 84-54. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Burk Collins Investments, Inc. to rezone Blocks 1 & 2, Fox Hollow Addition, from their present classification of R-3 (Single Family) to R-5-D (Duplex). This property is located north of Watauga Road, bounded on the south by the railroad and on the west by North Park Estates. Acting Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Burk Collins came forward. He said he was requesting the change from R-3 to duplex for a higher yield. He said there had been flooding problems in this area and he has corrected most of it. Mr. Collins said he had built 1,500 foot concrete lined channel and would build another 500 feet. He said this is very expensive and if he could get this zoning, it would help with "this added expense. Mr. Wood asked how he plans to get access to this subdivision. Mr. Collins said he and Doug Long plan to build a road to Watauga Road. Acting Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I, I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,- . Page 7 P & Z Minutes July 12, 1984 (' ( There being no one wishing to speak, the Acting Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hannon asked when it was 'zoned. Doug Long came forward. He said he had owned this property approximately 10 years. He said it was originally IF-7 (Single Family) which was done away with. He said they had intended to put 235 houses on it. Mr. Long' said then they zoned it Industrial since it was close to the railroad which was in 1973 or 74, but the financing fell through. Mr. Long said when the new ordinance and map was adopted, he was told he could not use it, it would be non-conforming and said it could go to R-3. He said they thought the Industrial zoning might not be the best so they allowed it to be changed to R-3. Mr. Long said he paid for the railroad crossing 10 years ago and he will assist Mr. Collins in bringing the street through to Watauga Road. He said they already have a culvert there and water and sewer, but it has been there so long, and so much has developed, they will have to increase the size of the culvert. Mr. Hannon asked if North Park Estates was built at the time they received the Industrial zoning. Mr. Long said he did not think the houses were built, but the property was zoned. He said the City Council said we would have to put a lesser use of Industrial next to them. Mr. Long said the property to the south of the property in question was previously Local Retail but is now C-l. Mr. Hannon asked how many property owners were contacted. I '." I Ie I I Page 8 p & Z Minutes July 12, 1984 (> '),< \_~~ Mrs. Calvert said 30. She said she had several calls stating they had seen the sign and wanted to ~now what they were asking for and when it would be heard. PZ 84-55 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the mo,tion to approve PZ 84-55. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-1 with Ms. Nash voting against. 12, CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE 11080 Acting Chairman Bowen stated this amendment was regarding definitio and the parking and storage of vehicles. He asked the Commi members after having read t s amendment, were there an~ questions. I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. Hannon said he w ld like to add motorcycles to th irst line, page one, under Vehi e, Commuter definition. Mr. Ha n made the motion to reco end to the City Council the a roval of this amendment. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:10 P. M. ACTING CHAIRMAN PLAN~ING & ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - '<" _",,_....:,:- -.,#"'...... "".,. ~ - -.,.;..>;"'~~·:-.7'.··-- '.,.,~ .1 · I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I -I ",I e I 1 #<' ..~ ,... ('t. , , l"~ -:, t ~ ..... r KNOWL TON-E NGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 10, 1984 Planning and Zoning commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 10N~NG ~ASE PI 8~-5~ RE~IEW LETTER! ZON NG ROM R-3 !Q R-~-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 86 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enc10sures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician ' July 10, 1984 PZ 84-55 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 · 817/283-8211 · METRO/267-3387 ~~4!!~~~r."r.,~JI~~..~~,~~~ II II Ie I I I I II I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I JfJ I f ii,'? ORDINANCE NO. I ' Y "f' AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII. AMENDMENTS. OF ZONING ORDINANCE 11080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS. PASSED. APPROVED. AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. JANUARY 9. 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND-- PUBL~rC- HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 84-55 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-3 to R-5-D. BEING Blocks 1 and 2. Fox Hollow Addition. to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas. as recorded in Volume 388-110, Page 17, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at north of Watauga Road. bounded on the south by the railroad and on the west by North Park Estates. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 12th DAY OF JULY. 1984. ¿£J~ C ~Y" ??i~~ G;?£~:::X; Zoning Conunission Secretary, ~ing & Zoning Conunission BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.PZ-84-55 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Rex McEntire. City Attorney I II- I ~UBJECT: ði DATE: Augus·t 9. 1984 " Amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 j,"~ \ 1) ¡ 1 "t- < I I II I I I I_ I el I I I I I CIn COUNCIL ACTION Ju:QUIJlED: Approval or denial of amendment. Ie I DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Commission was asked to draw up an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regardinK the parkinK of vehicles and the stQra~e of ~~hicles. Therhave'drawn up this amendment for your consideration. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this amendment. BUDCET!]) ITÐt: ACCOUNT NUKBER: YES If 0 x 4~{)~ I· I Ie I I I I I Ie I I I II I' I I Ie I Page 8 P & Z Minutes July 12, 1984 (" \ 12, CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 ADJOURNMENT ( "'. , Mrs. Calvert said had several call seen the and wanted to know what t ere asking for and when it would be heard. Mr. Wood made the mQtion to approve PZ 84-55. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-1 with Ms. Nash voting against. Acting Chairman Bowen stated this amendment was regarding definitions and the parking and storage of vehicles. He asked the Commission members after having read this amendment, were there any questions. Mr. Hannon said he would like to add motorcycles to the first line, page one, under Vehicle, Commuter definition. Mr. Hannon made the motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of this amendment. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:10 P. M. ACTING CHAIRMAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION .. . I· II Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that Ordina~ce No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance), adopted January 9, 1984 and as hereto'fore amended, be and the same is hereby amended at the following sections: SECTION III - DEFINITIONS: Add the following wordi~g: Vehicle, Commuter: Passenger Automobiles, motorcycles, trucks and vans not exceeding 3/4 ton nominal capacity; pickup trucks not exceeding one ton nominal capacity; busses and vans used for mass commuting and not exceeding one ton nominal capacity nor having seating for more than twelve persons including the driver. Vehicle, Recreational: Self propelled motor vehicle or "motor home" intended to provide mobile living quarters for one or more persons and used for recreational purposes; "Winnebago" or similar. Truck, Pickup: A vehicle in factory original configuration and being designated by its manufacturer as being a pickup truck; not including vehicles with special purpose bodies or beds installed by dealers or customizers. Trailer, private: A travel trailer, boat trailer, cargo trailer or any non-self propelled wheeled vehicle intended to be towed behind a commuter vehicl,e and used for recreational purposes or to transport goods and materials for home use; not including commercial trailer or house trailer. Trailer, Commercial: Any trailer not qualifying as a private trailer or commercial trailer. Vehicle, Parking of: The temporary and short term stationary placement of an unoccupied vehicle on a paved surface where the vehicle is fully operational and used on a frequent basis; does not include storage. Vehicle, Storage of: The temporary or permanent long term placement of an unoccupied vehicle on a paved surface where the vehicle is either not fully operational or is not used for commuting purposes at least monthly. Parking: see Vehicle, Parking of. I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 Storage: see Vehicle, Storage of. Residential District: Any zoning district whose classification allows as a permitted use or as a legal nonconforming use the construction or maintenance of dwellings for human habitation; including, but not limited to: R-l, R-2, R-3, R-4-SD, R-5-D, R-6-T, R-7-MF, AG, and any and all portions o~ planned developments allowing residential construction; includes mobile home parks and special use residential property whether conforming or not. SECTION 9.4.1: Delete all wording and add the following: District area requirements: one acre. SECTION 24.15: Delete all wording and add the following: 24.15.1 24.15 PARKING AND STORAGE OF VEHICLES 24.15.2 This section applies to all residential districts. Parking of Commuter Vehicles: Commuter vehicles may be parked on paved driveways located anywhere on a platted lot or tract of land within a residential district including within required front, side and rear yards and within the public right of way between the curb face of a curbed street and the property line of said lot or tract provided that such paved driveways were constructed pursuant to a valid building permit. Where curb does not exist on the abutting public street, vehicles parked in driveways shall be positioned such that no part of any vehicle is closer than 25 feet from the centerline of said street or the right of way line whichever is less. Commuter vehicles.may also be parked along the curb on paved public streets for periods not to exceed 16 hours per day and provided that such location is not a designated no parking zone or upon a street designated as a collector, major or arterial thoroughfare on the most recentLcity master thoroughfare plan. Where curb does not exist on the abutting public street, vehicles parked along the street shall be positioned such that no part of any vehicle is closer than 25 feet from the centerline of said street. Vehicles may not be parked so as to block any sidewalks which exist in public right of way. ~ I Page 3 I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 24.15.3 Storage of Commuter Vehicles: A maximum of two commuter vehicles may be stored on any platted lot or tract in a residential district. Such stored vehicles must be placed on paved surfaces and be screened from all public view. Such stored vehicles may be located anywhere on said lot or tract behind the front building line including within required side and rear yards, provided however that no vehicle may be stored within ten feet of the principal structure,~n the property unless it is garaged within said principal structure. 24.15.4 Temporary Parking: Recreational vehicles and private trailers may be parked within residential districts on the same basis as commuter vehicles for periods not to exceed 24 continuous hours nor more than three full or partial 24 hour periods in any consecutive seven day period. 24.15.5 Storage of Non-Commuter Vehicles: Recreational vehicles and private trailers may be stored in residential districts on paved surfaces located behind the front building line and screened from all public view including within required rear and side yards but no closer than ten feet from the principal structure on a given lot or tract unless garaged within said principal structure. Recreational vehicles and private trailers in storage may not be occupied nor connected to any utility that would permit, facilitate or enhance occupancy. 24.25.6 Agricultural Exemption: The requirements of this section will not apply to any portion of an AG zoned tract actually in use for farming or ranching. A valid agricultural exemption from the Tarrant Appraisal District will be considered as proof of agricultural use. 24.15.7 24.15.8 Other Vehicles Prohibited: Parking or storage of any vehicle except as above permitted is prohibited in a residential district. . Variances: The Zoning Board of Adjustment will hear requests for variances from these requirements and such variances, if granted, will specify a specific individual vehicle by VIN number and Texas registration tag number, a specific individual person by name and a specific individual platted lot or tract of land by street address and either lot and block or metes and bounds, and the specific date no more than five years after the effective date of the variance upon which said variance will expire. Said variance will expire upon the earliest of the following: expiration date of variance, disposal of the specified vehicle by the specified individual, at any time when the specified property ceases to be the principal residence of the specified individual. I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 4 CREATE THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS AS RECORDS OF COUNCIL ACTION AND ADMINISTRATIVELY ADD WORDING AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED FOR: 28.13 RECORD OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS 28.14 RECORD OF ZONING CHANGES 28.15 RECORD OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS The amendments contained herein and the amendments adopted under Ordinance Number 1112 as well as all future amendments to Ordinance Number 1080 are to be administratively incorporated into the body of the Zoning Ordinance book published by this city and available for purchase by the public. Revisions to the Zoning Ordinance book are to be accomplished as follows: pages containing amended sections are to be revised and the date of the most recent revision shown on the revised page. Fractional page numbers may be used if necessary to insert large bodies of additional text. Where large bodies of text are deleted, pages will be consolidated and resulting blank pages will remain with page numbers and, the notation "This page intentionally left blank." Section 28.13: Record of Ordinance Amendments will be revised after each amendment to the general requirements of Ordinance Number 1080. Sections 28.14, Record of Zoning Changes and 28.15, Record of Planned Developments shall be revised subsequent to the passage of this ordinance to reflect all such changes approved by council between January 9, 1984 and the effective date of this ordinance as well as all existing planned developments recognized in the adoption of the zoning map in Ordinance Number 1080. Sections 28.14 and 28.15 will be subsequently revised every time the official published zoning map is revised or more often as determined by the city manager, but no less often than once per year. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF· , 1984. Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney .I / / ,/ 't!~ I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ) ~J- DATE: August 13, 1984 SUBJECT: Progress Report on Kinqswood Estates DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: This request to appear pertains to an update by Charles Evans on his progress in obtaining a letter from the downstream property owner for Mr. Bud Austin. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: N/A BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: NO N/A N/A N/A I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I -- I CHARLES W. EVANS A TTORNEY AT LAW P.Q, Box 8 HURST, TEXAS 76053 (817) 282,9811 August 1, 1984 Ms. Jeannette Moore City Secretary City of North Richland Hills North Riehland Hills, TX 76118 Re: Kingswood Estates Dear Jeannette: I would appreciate it if you would place Mr. Bud Austin and myself on the agenda at the August 13 meeting of the city council in order that we may update the council on the progress of Kingswood Estates and request continuation of the project and the pos~ibility of condemnation proceedings. Thank you for your consideration. Sine r CE/mfk cc: Mr. Walter Cook Attorney at Law (Certified Mail) I I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ 073 DATE: August 13, 1984 SUBJECT: Appeal of PZ 84-52 DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: Planning and Zoning denied PZ 84-52 on July 26, 1984. The applicant, Doyne S. Byrd, has requested an Appeal Hearing. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Set Appeal Hearinq date for September 10. 1984. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A I I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I " L"T ul Y J 0, 1 9 2 !~, City of r'Jorth Richlar.d Eills i. C. Jox 18t09 TTorth Ricr~larld :-!ills, rrexas 7tl1~ l\. t tn: f," s. lrIfinda C al ver t ]e: lot JR, Block 2), Clearview Addition (rZ 84-52) ='ear :')~s. Calvert: i'lease be advised tha.t I would like to a.ppeal to the council the decision of the Flanning and Zoning Comm- ission on the date of July 2t, 1984. ~!ery truly yours, L)oyne S. :3yrd t~}· · 1- 1~øf ~,...... - t DATE: 7-30-84 ,SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: Citizen Request for a Variance From the Brick Ordinance Building Inspections 1 1 BACKGROUND: We have an ordinance that requires that all multi-family, two family and single family residences must have 75% brick or stone or other materials ---a-sa-pproved by the'-City - Council. This requirement stipulates that 75% 1 must be on the lower floor only. The enforcement of this ordinance has been that the garage is included as part of the residence and the requirement I has been that they must have 75% brick or stone also. I As I understand it, Mr. Hubbard is requesting a variance on a five bay, -two story detached garage with an upstairs storage room. There is also 1 a two bay garage attached to the house by a covered walkway which will be masonry. Because of the enforcement of this ordinance in the past Ie I 1 by the Inspection Department there are other people in the area that have been required to use 75% brick, I would recommend that this request be denied. 1 I I I I Ie CITY COUNCIL ACTION R£QUI~ED: Approve/disapprove the request for a variance from the brick ordinance. JUDGETED ITEM: II ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N / A N/A N~~ ~', I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Fort ~orth, Texas July 13, 1 984 ì~r. Roger Lyon City of North Richland Hills Dea,r S1 r, I [:.!T1 sending you this letter in re~uest of ê;. vó.rinnce from the Brick Otd;inance for Lüt 3, Block 4, Eewitt Estate5, North Richland ¡:ill s. This re'luest concerns a garagp and/or storage building buil t at the back of the lot that. ,,·e did not plan to put brick on. \,'e d.id not realize it was against the ordinance since it was at the bAck a.nd behind the house. Sincerely, ~ ~ Jf.jA L-t~i I---J , , T. J. Hubbard "I'" if - I ... I SUBJECT: ..." ._...----_........,~........,..._. .,-.........;...~.)"~....;..,...,...".........~,... ~-' ~,..........-..- -~~................~~.................-~~ ~""""~..,........ .#'''~. ..-,.., I;?~ DATE: 8-1-84 Request of Variance From Brick Ordinance for the Residence at 6417 Diamond Loch I DEPARTMENT: Inspections I BACKGROUND: To be consistent with the enforcement of this ordinance the staff recommends ----that -you -deny this request. - There are other citizens throughout the city I that have had to comply with this ordinance. I I I Ie I I I I I I I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the reQuest for a variance from II 4IÞ the brick ordinance. I JUDGETED ITEM: T NUMBER: YES -1'-'· I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I ,I I I I Ie I July 30, 1984 City Managerl Please consider my request to be given an opportunity to speak to the City Council at the August 13 City Council Meeting. I am requesting a variance from the 75% brick ordinance. I am planning to add a 2 car garage to the back of my home. It would not be viewed from the street and blends with the exterior of the rear of my home which is siding. None of my neighbors object to my adding such a structure to my home. ~espectfully submitted, ~~ Arlene Stoermer 6417 Diamond Loch Ft. Worth, Tx. 76118 498-6646 to ~ I I ~ ~'" II » I SUBJECT: DATE: 8-1-84 Request for Variance From the Brick Ordinance for An Out Building at 4830 Blaney I DEPARTMENT: Inspections I BACKCROUND: To be consistent with the enforcement of this ordinance the staff recommends that you deny this request. There are other citizens throughout I I I I Ie I I I I I I the city that have had to comply with this ordinance. I CITY COUNCIL ACTION IEQUIJlED: ~ the brick ordinance. Approve/disapprove the request for a variance from 1-I1JØCETED ITEM: YES CCOUNT IfUHBER: -I~ I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (PO'l,tE,'l, Comþan~ 4830 BLA.NEY ATENU:K P. O. BOX 18768 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 Ò/FW METRO 817 498-3389 July 31, 1984 Mr. Rodger Line, City Manager City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 SUBJECT: BRICK ORDINANCE VARIANCE PROPERTY: 4828-4900 BLANEY AVE. Dear Mr. Line: It is hereby requested that the City of North Richland Hills allow the exterior facing of an out building, herein identified as "Carriage Shed", to be constructed of 1" x 8" lap and gap Cedar siding, applied over 1/2" double foil faced thermal board. · The enclosed Architectural rendering depicts the general appearance, which is such to conform with the Architecture and Construction of a Heritage 'replicia, and is in keeping with the general appearance and styling of the principle dwelling structure of Georgian Colonial design. This building will compliment and enhance'the quality of the surroundings and in DO manner could be considered as undesirable or substandard. Your affirmative consideration will be appreciated. REP/ns l t, I- I' Ie ~~: I I I I I Ie I I ,~I. . I , ! ,. ... I ......,/...r .. ~. I I ,1,_ . _...... __". ..... ..... .h_ .... þ ('W~"'_ ~' ,,,, .. ~ ,~..~~~~~f.. ~-.'..~.}:.'.~.~;.. f - .... .( \~ .~ YtY'-"~'~. .;' ,,\" "d ) e-.~' ~ _I", ~ Zþ "V ~ ...~ .f'/¡iJ .,ft.~( \ / "·7 ,. /' ((I # .ir~~r-~ ïJ(4 ~. ; ,I ,...11 ~r~ 'j J ! ': ,,' Þ.'\'-.4 i: · ,~, ~f . ~f . , i . r. t t I \ .... I " . .... l /':a. "I~! \, - -'). , . J) ~ ~.. ' ~I ;.'..tf .-"" . . -. I: . .~ .1.... , " ,. , -' -'" ' :,. ";' '. . ..,,' , '"' .iI' ' ...1 { . . ~ . " . , ' -' .. ,! . ....Ii T~~ CAR~IAGE S~ED CO~STf<UCT'O~ DETAILS I~ ~ .ðiÍI'" .;,,<: . ' ... '~"-'r-:;, . ,'. :r. .... . ~,}, ' ~~;f~~~~}-;~~:~;:;,J: . ,.. ":(~: """" Ifr """1 ~\', C 0 /"1 ~,'\ ,,~ Ii ~, /:' I' I/~ ~ ¿ "'_---.......... C'.. ~ ~ ~~ø.· s· TO~;:,,// ~ ;:: ~ # ~ æ '" '. ~ ~ ~ "- l~ ,..I ~" ~ ~ ...~. i': .... - :: .~ ~-:"'I~:A ... :: = * t~ ~..,., 0' * = S __ , No. 8950 ; ^- ~ ~~, , ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~~. ~<:> .' ~ ~ ~ ~ "'" "/STE".,,' ~ $' ~ ~~ '--.-..- ~~" §- ~¡#'l IONAl ~ ~,,~ ,'~', llllll'''U''\\\\\~ ~'-I TOWNSEND t SOW ... o. ..O~ Z.OOfi. ~ _w....,.~OA.T. CT. 06.S0 t·, PE~.& PECT\ VE n ". V I E W . No.· 1'9 ' I IWCT: I DEPARTMENT: ICKGR.OUND: DATE: 8/3/84 ,.., r' ex'/ TRANSFER OF GENERAL FUNDS TO CAPITAL PROJECTS Ftmn ,I ¡ ~-- fAt FINANCE With the revenues collected above bud2et and the expenditur~R under bud2et it is staff recommendation that we transfer $1,000 000 to the General Capital Projects Fund from the General Fund. This will be unspecified appropriations to be allocated to pro ects at a future CIP meetin . I I I Ie I I I I I I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval/Disanproval of transf~T of '"F11nti~ I I!GETED ITEM: rCCOUNT NUMBER.: YES NO N/A 1~(J0- ¥(~~~) I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I- I DATE: 8-13-84 d2 SUBJECT: Speed Limit - Highwav 26 (Grapevine Hi2hwav) DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The State has made a traffic study on Highway 26 (Grapevine Highwav) and made the following recommendations regarding the speed limit: Reduce the speed limit from 45 MPH near the intersection of Highway 26 and Ash~ a distance of approximately 0.317 miles; reduce speed limit from 50 MPH to 45 MPH at Grove Street through Emerald Hills Way; Speed limit will be 50 MPH from Campus Drive to Hurst City Limits. The Police Department concurs with the State's recommendation. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Ordinance BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A NO I ROBERT C, LANIER, CHAIRMAN ROBERT H. DEDMAN JOHN R, BUTLER, JR, I I f I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I , ~G~tt ,o~ ~ þ ~ w.r .' * )( :t' > ~ .. '.. ,.... . '. COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION P. O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, Texas 76115 (817) 292-6510, Ext.325 July 5, 1984 _e_ _e_ ENGINEER-DIRECTOR MARK G. GOODE Control: Highway: County: 363-01 S. H. 26 Tarrant IN REPLY REFER TO FILE NO, Subject: Speed Zoning in North Rich1and Hills Honorable Dan Echols Mayor, City of North Rich1and Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mayor Echo1c~ We are enclosing two (2) blue1ine prints of the strip map for State Highway 26 within the City of North Rich1and Hills. Based on recent traffic surveys in this area, we recommend the following speed zones: (a) From Station 464+94., northeasterly to Station 481+70 near the intersection of S. H. 26 and Ash Street, a distance of 0.317 mile, at 40 miles per hour. (b) From Station 481+70, northeasterly to Station 535+00, a distance of 1.009 mile, at 45 miie ,... per hour. (c) From Station 535+00, northeasterly to Station 7+28 (city limits of North Rich1and Hills, being also the southwest city limits of Hurst), a distance of 0.990 mile, at 50 miles per hour. Please review the strip map, and if you concur with our recommendations, we would appreciate your passing an ordinance establishing the proposed speed zones. We are enclosing two copies of the typical speed zone ordinance for your consider- ation. If you elect to pass the ordinance, please return the original to this office. You may retain a copy of the ordinance and both maps for your files and use. We appreciate your help and consideration in this matter. RB/dk Enclosures Yours very truly, c¡k!. ;$~ J. R. Stone District Engineer ~ J r\' \~\\\\ · i ~ \ \'-> 183(; ! ' ",- 1"8(; stS~\l\ tE~1 {;.n...", I I f I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SPEED ZONE ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE ALTERING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED FOR VEHICLES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 167 AND 169 OF ARTICLE XIX, R.C.S. 670ld, UNIFORM ACT REGULATING TRAFFIC ON HIGHWAYS, UPON THE BASIS OF AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION UPON CERTAIN STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, OR PARTS THEREOF, WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF North Richland Hills AS SET OUT IN THE ORDINANCE: AND PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $200.00 FOR VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, Section 167 and 169 of Article XIX, R.C.S. 670ld, Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways, provides that whenever the governing body of the City shall determine upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that any prima facie speed there- in set forth is greater or less than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist at any intersection or other place or upon any part of a street or highway, with the City taking into considera- tion the width and condition of the pavement and other circumstances on such portion of said street or highway, as well as the usual traffic thereon, said govern body may determine and declare a reasonable and safe prima facie speed limit thereat or thereon by the passage of an ordinance, which shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected at such intersection or other place or part of the street or highway, now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills ,Texas: Section 1. Upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation heretofore made 8S authorized by the provisions of Section 167 and 169 of Article XIX, R.C.S. 6701d, Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways, the following prima facie speed limits hereafter indicated for vehicles are hereby determined and declared to be reasonable and safe; and such speed l~its are hereby fixed at the rate of speed indicated for vehicles traveling upon the named streets and highways, or parts thereof, described 88 follows: I. . I f I I I I I I lit I I I I I I I -- I .. C6ntro1: 363-01 S. H. 26 -2- , (A) From Station 464+94 (at the centerline of Interstate Highway 820) north- easterly to Station 481+70, the intersection of S. H. 26 and Ash Street, a distance of 0.317,mi1e at 40 miles per hour. (b) From Station 481+70, northeasterly to Station 535+00 (approximately 750' east of Walker's Branch Creek) a distance of 1.009 mile, at 45 miles per hour. (C) From Station 535+00, northeasterly to Station 7+28 (city limits of North Richland Hills, being also the southwest city limits of Hurst) a distance of 0.990 mile, at 50 miles per hour. Section 2. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any sum not more than two-hundred($200.00)dollars. This ordinance supersedes all previous ordinances pertaining to the above referenced highway. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS ATTEST: DAY OF APPROVED: 19 Ci ty Secretary Mayor I I DATE: August 13.1984 Ordinance "971" Civil Preparedness DEPARTMENT: Purchasing BACKGROUND: An Ordinance creating the office of Civil Preparedness Director and Coordinator, and providing the duties and responsibilities of those offices. Creating an operational organization; Granting necessary' powers to cope with emer- gencies threatening life and property in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; Authorizing cooperative and mutual aid agreements for relief work between this and other cities or countries and for related purposes; ProhibitingJ unauthorized warning and all-clear signals and making violations a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not not exc~eding $200. In Fiscal year 83-84 Council approved the purchase and installation of the Civil Defense Siren System. This system has been purchased, installed, tested and any future needs will be yearly maintenance, electrical service, repairs arising from vandalism and miscellaneous inspections.' Ih the above mentioned Ordinance "971" Section 9 as it now reads "No person shall have the right to expend any Public funds of the City in carrying out any disaster service activity authorized by this Ordinance without' prior approval by the City Council, nor shall any person have any right to bind the City by contract, agreement or otherwise without prior and specific approval of the City Council." As written this Ordinanee requires any Purchase made for the Civil Defense System be approved by the City Council, whether it be in any amount. Section 9 as written does not fall within the guide lines set by City Charter or State Law. To enable the Director, Assistant Director or the Coordinator of Civil Preparedness to expend funds for electrical service, re airs and maintenance Section 9 should read " No person shall have the right to expend the Public funds of the City in carrying out disaster service activity authorized by this Ordinance without (CONT t) Page 2 I I I I I I Ie I ¡I I ;1 jl \1 roval by the Director, Assistant Director or the Coordinator of Civil Preparedness." This pertains to amounts less than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) This will bring Ordinance 971 in line with the City Charter, State law and insure fast and efficient operation of the Civil Defense System. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Ordinance 971 Approve/Disapprove Amendment to Section 9 of Ie BUDGETED ITœ: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A NO (;JIJl I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 971 of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas Be it Ordained by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. Section 9 of Ordinance No. 971 of this city be and is hereby repealed. 2. Section 9 of Ordinance No. 971 shall hereafter read as follows: "Section 9: No person shall have the right to expend the public funds of'the City in carring out disaster service activity authorized by this ordinance without prior approval of the Director, the Assistant Director or the Coordinator of Civil Preparedness." Passed and approved this day of ,1984 Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney SECTION 1: There is hereby created the office (function) of Civil Pre- paredness Director of the city of North Rich1and Hills, which shall be held by the Mayor of North Rich1and Hills in accordance with state law. I' , I Ie I I I I TEXAS: I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NUMBER 971 AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE OFFICES OF CIVIL PREPAREDNESS DIRECTOR, AND COORDINATOR, AND PROVIDING THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THOSE OFFICES: CREATING AN OPERATIONAL ORGANIZATION: GRANTING NECESSARY POWERS TO COPE WITH EMERGENCIES THREATENING LIFE AND PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: AUTHORIZING COOPERATIVE AND MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS FOR RELIEF WORK BETWEEN THIS AND OTHER CITIES OR COUNTIES AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES: PROHIBITING UNAUTHORIZED wARNING AND ALL-CLEAR SIGNALS AND MAKING VIOLATIONS A 'MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINE NOT EXCEEDING $200.00. ' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, (a) An Assistant Civil preparedness Director may be appointed and serve at the pleasure of the Director; A Civil preparedness coordinator may be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Director; The Director shall be responsible for carrying out the duties and responsibilities set forth in section 4 of this ordinance. He may delegate authority for execution of these duties to the Assistant Director and/or the coordinator, but ultimate responsibility for such execution shall remain with the Director. (b) (c) SECTION 2: The powers and duties of the Director shall include superv1.s1.on of the development of a disaster services plan for the city of North Richland Hills, and the recommendation for adoption by the city council of any and all mutual aid plans and agreements which are deemed essential for the i~lementation of such disaster services plan. The powers of the Director shall include the authority to declare a state of emergency, but such action may be subject to confirmation by the City council at its next meeting. The duties of the Director shall also include the causing of a survey of the availability of existing personnel, equipment, supplies and services which could be used during an emergency, as provided for herein, as well as a con- tinuing study of the need for a~endments and imProvements in the disaster services plan. SECTION 3: The duties and responsibilities of the Civil Preparedness Direc- tor shall include the following: (a) The control and direction of the actual operation or training of the disaster services organization of the city of North Richland Hills. The determination of all questions of authority and responsibility that may arise within the disaster services organization of the City of North Rich1and Hills. (b) ,,~," ",~~;,;,,,,~~~~~~~,t~~".;¡&o/~~~';~~;~'''~"~ SECTION 4: The operational disaster services organization of the City of Richland Hills shall consist of the officers and employees of the City of North Richland Hills so designated by the Director in the disaster services plan, as well as all organized volunteer disaster relief associations or groups. The functions and duties of this organization shall be distributed among such'officers and employees in accordance with the terms of the disaster services plan. Such plan shall set forth the form of the organization, establish and designate divisions and functions, assign tasks, duties, and powers, and designate officers and employees to carry out the pro- visions of this Ordinance. Insofar as possible, the form of organization, titles, and terminology shall conform to the recommendations of the state Disaster Emergency Services council of the state of Texas and of the Federal government. I· I Ie I I I I I I I~th I I I (c) The maintenance of necessary liaison with other municipal, 'district, State, county, regional, Federal or other disaster services organizations. (d) The marshaling, after declaration of an emergency as provided for above, of all necessary personnel, equipment or supplies from any department of the City of North Richland Hills to aid in the carrying out of the disaster services plan. (e) The issuance of all necessary proclamations as to the existence of an emergency and the immediate operational effectiveness of the disaster services plan. (f) The issuance of reasonable rules, regulations or directives which are necessary for the protection of life and property in the City of North Richland Hills. (g) The supervision of the drafting and execution of mutual aid agree- ments, in cooperation with the representatives of state and of other local political subdivisions of the State, and the drafting and execution, if deemed desirable, of an agreement with the county in which said City is located and with other municipalities within the county, for the county-wide coordination of disaster services efforts. (h) The supervision of and final authorization for the procurement of all necessary supplies and e9uipment, including acceptance of private contributions. (i) The authorizing of agreements, after approval of the City Attorney, for the use of private property for public shelter and other purposes. I SECTION 5: Any unauthorized person who shall operate a siren or other device so as to simulate a warning signal, or the termination of a warning, shall be deemed guilty of a violation of-this Ordinance and shall be subje~t to the penalties imposed by this Ordinance. SECTION 6: At all times when the orders, rules, and regulations made and promulgated pursuant to this Ordinance shall be in effect, they shall supersede and override all existing ordinances, orders, rules, and regulations insofar as the latter may be inconsistent therewith. I I SECTION 7: This Ordinance shall not be construed so as to conflict with any state or Federal statute or with any military or naval order, rule or regulation. I Ie I -2- I' - . ~ I SECTION 8: This Ordinance is an exercise by the City of its governmental functions for the protection of the public peace, health, and safety and neither the tltity of North Richland Hills, the agents and representatives of said City, or any I individual, r,eceiver, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or trustee, or any of the agents thereof, in good faith carrying out, complying with or attempting to comply with, any order, rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to the provisions I of this Ordinance shall be liable for any damage sustained to persons as the result of said activity. Any person owning or controlling real estate or other premises who voluntarily and without compensation grants to the city of North Richland Hills a license or privilege, or otherwise permits the City to inspect, designate and use the 1 whole or any part or parts of such real estate or premises for the purpose of shelter- ing persons during an emergency or disaster shall, together with his successors in interest-, if any , not be civilly liable for the - death of, or injury to, any person I' on or about such real estated or prernisehs under such lficenhse, privilege or other per- .mission or for loss of, or amage to, t e property 0 sue person. I SECTION 9: No person shall have the right to expend any public funds of the City in carrying out any disaster services activity authorized by this Ordinance without prior approval by the City Council, nor shall any person have any right to bind the City by contract, agreement or otherwise without prior and specific approval of the City Council. I SECTION 10: It shall be unlawful for any person willfully to obstruct, I hinder, or delay any member of the disaster services organization in the enforcement of any rule or regulation issued pursuant to this Ordinance, or to do any act forbidden by any rule or regulation issued pursuant to the authority contained in this Ordinance. It shall likewise be unlawful for any person to wear, carry or display any emblem, II.-insignia or any other ~eans of identification as a member of the disaster services ~rganization of the City of North Richland Hills, unless authority so to do has been granted to such person by the proper officials. Convictions for violations of the II provisions of this Ordinance shall be punishable by fine. SECTION 11: If any portion of this Ordinance shall, for any reason, be declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions hereof. II SECTION 12: The immediate passage of this Ordinance is deemed essential to the public health, safety and welfare and it shall take effect immediately upon passage. I PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 9th Day of Au¡ust ;\ ___--1 . ,r-, I~; ,I~. ,_ ~/.~';-r/ ~ick ~aram - Mayor , 1982. II II ~EST: J . ./ I 1~ - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGA ITY: !I }eL I..ex McEn1-'íre - City Attorney -3- I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie 30 DATE: August 13, 1984 SUBJECT: Ri~ht-of-Way - Precinct Line Road DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The City of Hurst is interested in imDrovin~ Precinct Line Road from Hi~hway 26 (Grapevine Hiihway) to Davis Boulevard. Mavor Echols. Rodger Line and Gene Riddle attended the last meetini concerning this Dro;ect. The Citv of Hurst has asked for our participation in doini the necessarv ri2ht-of-wav work (surveyini. research. description preparation and drafting) showing 130 individual parcels of property. ililr share of this project is $5.000. ¡#¡~1l¡/ CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Agreement BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES NO X 01-99-01-5970 /'~~ r'~ .1,º--" ,t,l e" ... · ,. ,-...,j.'i'-":;:.:").""~ I I -, .'J~' ~,",,'''ú t'" .... ~~·t\ ~ !:;;.;.. ~ ~"', , r~ .~~~ ~ f ~¡y f' ,'~:Ki ~lt~D' nurst memorandum TO: Mayor Dan Echols, City of No. Richland Hills DATE: July 31, 1984 \Rodier Line, City Manaier. City of No. Richland Hills Mayor Robert E. Neely, City of Colleyville Dick Ballinger, City Manager, City of Colleyville Commissioner Lyn Gregory, Tarrant County FROM: James R. McMeans, P.E., Director of Public Works Attached is a draft agreement for the preparation of the right-of-way descriptions for Precinct Line Road from Grapevine Highway to Davis Boulevard. This was requested at our meeting last Friday. Since Jim Starr is on vacation this week, I am taking the liberty to forward this draft to you for review. Please mark-up the draft agreement as you see fit and return it to Jim Starr at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your assistance. Attachment cc: Jim Starr, City Manager Allan Weegar, Asst. to the City Manager George Staples, City Attorney File - Project No. ,118-ST "- I I David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc. Registered Public Surveyors I_ c. Moak. R,P,S, resident · Subdi\'ision~ · Loan Surveys . Topography . Construction Layout . Acreage Michat.a) J, Nels{)n~ R.P,S. ISOciðte' June 26, 1984 I City of Hurst 1501 Precinct Line Road Hurst, Texas 76053 I I I Attention: Jim McMeans, Director of Public Works Dear Jim: At your request we have made an examination of the requirements for right of way aquisition for the widening of Precinct Line Road from State Highway 26 to F. M. Road 1938 thru the Cities of Hurst, Colleyville and North Richland Hills. I You suggested the new right of way width probably will be 100 feet in which event you already have some of the dedication along Prestondale Estates. With that in mind, we feel there will be approximately l30 parcels to be aquired for a length II of nearly four miles. ~we propose to do necessary surveying, research, description preparation and drafting, showing individual parcels for a fee not to exceed $18,OOO.00 ~ I I I feel confident we could have your office assistance of the plats you have and the access of your tax department records for other data needed. ~e certainly would consider it a privi1edge to work with you on this project. I I I I I Ie I »::;;:;ç,J David C. Moak / . ,jp TNc..LÙDéS t>ít£P~ON er= A- '5T/'2...IIJ MfrP PÐL eo~ ,-,en. $ ~"I\J W ~ IW- Jÿ - ~n . r,:,J,¡:,~' : - "11 : I ~:, \,', '. ~" ¡ ~ € N t=L..~ÐN . , , 1 ,t,,~ 2 7 fq~::: :~: L-. 105-8 Bedford Rd. . Bedford, l'exas 7602] · Metro 26R-221) · (817) 282-0401 I I ae I I I I I I -. I I I I I I I Ie I Agreement 1) íUt-Pr -------- 7- 30-84- WHEREAS, Precinct Line Road from Grapevine Highway (SH 26) to Davis Boulevard (F1\1 1936) is an important major thoroughfare route for northeast Tarrant County and; WHEREAS, Precinct Line Road is designated as Farm to Market Road No. 3029 and; WHEREAS, the Cities of Colleyville, Hurst, and North Richland Hills and Tarrant County are vitally interested in the widening and improvement of Precinct Line Road and; WHEREAS, the improvement and widening of Precinct Line Road is needed to relieve existing congestion, improve safety and meet future north/south traffic demands and; WHEREAS, a 100 foot right-of-way is needed for the widening of Precinct Line Road and; WHEREAS, the early acquistion of the needed the right-of-way is an essential first step toward seeking approval of funding for the widening of Precinct Line Road; Now Therefore, the Cities of Colleyville, Hurst and North Richland Hills and Tarrant County do hereby agree as follows: . 1. The firm of David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc. shall be engaged to prepare a right-of-way strip map and individual parcel descriptions for a 100 foot right-of-way for Precinct Line Road - from Grapevine Highway (SH 26) to Davis Boulevard (FM 1936) for a fee not to exceed $18,000. 2. The Cities of Colleyville, Hur~t, and North Richland Hills and Tarrant County agree to share the expense of this surveying as follows: Colleyville Hurst North Richland Hills Tarrant County TOTAL $ 3,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 $18,000 Should the total expense be less than the stated amount the participation of each entity shall be in the same proportion to the total as that stated above. 3. Upon completion of / pursue donation r- of the right-of-" 4. The Cities ~ agree tÞ· ;~ fundeci \'J) i:rJY I ~ . DATE: 7-30-84 -~./. ....... . I SUBJECT : e ' I Watauga Drive Pump Station Contractor's Estimate #1 and Final DEP ARTMENT : Utility I I~ BACKGROUND: The n~w pump work at the Watåuga pump station is complete and in operating condition. . This installation has made the difference between running'short of water . . and.not runhing short òf water. With these new pumps running it has meant that we I can gain water in our system during' the 'peak hours 'of operation. ,We are one of the few cities in the area that has not had, to control our, water usage this:'summer. I During our high usè days we have used about 12 to 13 million gallons in one day. I' I Ie I I I CIn COUNCIL AC'!ION REQUIRED: of $14,752.00 Approve/disapprove payment to ASA HUNT, INC. in the amount I BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO I I I 1'_ I :::::_:::~__::::Å_~------------------~--------------------------- I I I· I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 23, 1984 Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-500, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WATAUGA DRIVE PUMP STA. IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S EST 1M. NO.1 AND FINAL Attached is Invoice No. 12749 from ASA HUNT, INC. in the amount of $14,752.00 for work performed on the referenced project. This work includes furnishing and installing two pumps and motors, along with removing two existing units from the pump station. We have verified that this work has been completed in accordance with the Contract Specifications and the new pumps are functioning properly. We would recommend immediate payment of this first and final estimate to ASA HUNT, INC., 1850 West Commerce, Dallas, Texas, 75208, in the total amount of $14,752.00. Please call if you RWA/ra Enclosures cc. Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assist. Dir. of Public Works Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Asa Hunt, Inc., Contractor SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I I ~ I SUBJECT: ~'" ...~ "\ ---' DATE: 8/7/84 Northfield and Norich Park Improvements, Contractor's Part;~l I DIP ART KEN T : I lAC KG ROUND : Payment, Estimate #8 Parks & Recreation The contractor, Steele-Freeman, Inc., has completed approximatelv 95% of the con~trl1rt-; nn ~r r'h9 't\TQrtbfiglà Parl~ :aRe is 'LIell sa 6<:ß~àl1I1.. II Contractor has completed approximately 90% I Park and expects to be completed on schedule. , t I I Ie I I of the irnprovpmpnt~ to Nor;rn I I I I I ii." COUNCIL ACTION lEQUIJlED: I ~ Steele-Freeman, Inc.', 'in the Approvp In; ~;:¡pprn"1ø partial payments, Estimate #8 amount of $242J1~~.83. I IUDGETED ItDt: YES X 10 Go Bonds I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 6, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-333, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NORTHFIELD AND NORICH PARK IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 8 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.8 dated August 3, 1984, made payable to STEELE-FREEMAN, INC., in the amount of $242,744.83 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of July 31, 1984. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Greg Wheeler, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $242,744.83 be made to STEELE-FREEMAN, INC., at 990 Blue Mound Road, Ft. Worth, Texas 76131. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. RWA/11 9 Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician STEELE-FREEMAN Inc. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG,. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I t- .BJEeT: I I ~~ dV'" DATE: 8-7-84 Final Pay Estimate for Signalization. on Rufe Snow I. DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: I II I I I Ie I I I I I :1 I CITY COUNCIL ACTION aEQUIJlED: Approve/disapprove payp¡ent to MICACorEoration in the , _ · amount of /7. 5' /~-. gc¡ I I :::: ø:::, YES Gen:ral O::igation Bonds~ ,~ Public Works The signals under this contract at Lewis Drive and Rufe Snow~ Watauga and Rufe Snow, and Chapman and Rufe Snow are complete and --. -in place and operating at this time. .I I · ( Ie I I I I I 1°1 Ie I I I I I I I I- I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 8, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-321 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TRAFFic SIGNALIZATION ON RUFE SNOW DRIVE AT LEWIS DRIVE, WATAUGA ROAD AND CHAPMt\N ROAD CONTR. PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3 AND FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor1s Partial Pay Estimate No.3, and Final, dated August 1, 1984, made payable to MICA Corporation, in the amount of $19,875.89., for materials furnished and work performed' on the referenced project as of May 20, 1984. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site.by your representative, Floyd McCallum, .as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. In the absence of any negative reports by the City Staff concerning the condition of this project, we would recommend that this final payment, in amount of $~Jlfe.oo. b, e made t~~I_CA Corporation at P.O. Box 14350, Fort Worth, Tx., 761l7~# I Ç"75 iSl.t, . This project includes traffic signalization installation on Rufe Snow Drive at Lewis Drive, Watauga Road, and Chapman Drive. Our latest report is that all signals are functioning properly. The Contract provides for a 3D-day test period which shall commence on this date and end on September 7, 1984. Any failure of equipment will require repair or replacement of defective units by the contractor and initialization of another 30-day test period. The two (2) year period of maintenance will begin on this date and terminate on August 7, 1986. This project was completed well under the contract completion date of September 26, 1984, therefore no liquidated damages were incurred. A hReconciliation Change Orderh is included for your information which accounts for differences in original estimated and actual as-built construction quantities. The original contract amount was $104,761.25 and the final Contractor earnings totals $100,275.81. July 8 t 1984 RUFE SNOW SIGNALIZATION Page 1 . ~50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 7e021.. 817/283-621'. MET~O/2C57-3367 ,I. 'I Ie I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I- I City Council Final Contractor's Esitmate continued We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. Bd-t4S-W. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ll 9 Enclosures . cc : :~: ~~~;e~; ~dl ~ ~ n~i r~~~~r M~~a ~~~ 1i c Worle s + BUS COEt fOR Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance MICA Corporation July 8 J 1984 RUFE SNOW SIGNALIZATION Page 2 ',. I ;, I .- i,-~ I 1- _BJECT: 1 DATE: 8-7-84 , ! Walker's Branch Drainage Improvement ray Estimate #11 1 DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: I 1 1 II 1 I. ,I I 1 1 1 I I CIn COUNCIL ACTION aEQUIJtED: .Co., in the amount of $50,179.95. I- I IUDCUD> ITEM: ACCOUNT NUHB£R: General Obligation ~ondS~ ~ Public Works This contractor is in the process of doing his fin~l clean ~D on the upper end of this project. He is attachin2 the brid2e rail to the bridge at Jennings Drive at this time. On the downstream end of the channel they are in the process of doin2 the earthen work at this time. Approve/disapprove payment to M.A. Vinson Construction YES x 110 .. I ( I- I I I I I °1 Ie I I I I I I I I- I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas Augus~ 6, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-323, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WALKER'S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 11 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor1s Partial Pay Estimate No. 11. dated August 1, 1984. made payable to M.A. Vinson Construction Co.. Inc.. in the amount of $50,179.95. for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of July 31. 1984. . The,quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representa~iv~. Floyd McCallum. as indicated by signature on the. . , " estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $50.179.95, be made to M.A. Vinson Construction Co. at P.O. Box 18520. Fort Worth, Tx.. 76118. Along with a copy of this letter. the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the ,next Council Meeting to answer any questions you m~ have concerning this project. ~. RWA/llg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line. City Manager ........ Di\S cOP.Y. E.OR Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works ~ Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum. City Inspector Mr. Greg Wheeler. Engineering Technician Mr. lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. M.A. Vinson. Contractor ~so FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 .817/283-8211. MET~O/267·3367 I I I I I I I I l- I I I I I I I -- I SUBJECT: Board Appointments DEPARTMENT: City Council The following appointments to various Boards and Commissions were BACKGROUND: 3¿;- DATE: August 13, 1984 agreed to at the Budget Worksession. Recommend the following appointments: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Council appointment) Reappoint Bill Fenimore, Jack Roseberry, Ron Hubbard and Billy Cypert (presently serving as alternate). Appoint Forest Grubb as alternate. BOARD OF APPEALS (Mayor appointment confirmed by Council) Joe Coúlson, Orville Baker, Gerald Stewart, John Larriviere and Robert Skinner. Appoint Erick Hill as alternate. CABLE TV BOARD (Council appointment) Reappoint Marge Isbell and Tiffany NourseL ~c!.t~e · , ..."' f ' . '1i', . ~. ~<, ; j./' i.~Ait7 '¥ r¡Ii"':-\~ Thomas Fleming iit'5'- CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION (Mayor appointment confirmed by Council) Reappoint David Phelps, Bob Roark and Lyle Welch. Appoint Jack Frisque as alternate. LIBRARY BOARD (Mayor appointment confirmed by Council) Reappoint Polly Brinkley, Jan Daniels and Lynn O'Day. Appoint Mickey Oxford to vacancy. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Council appointment) Reappoint Don Bowen and Mark Wood. Appoint John Schwinger (presently serving as alternate) Appoint Carroll Brents as alternate. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Appointments BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO N/A ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A I ~BJECT: I I I I II I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I 3~ DATE: August 13, 1984 Proposed 1984-85 Budget DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: Proposed 1984-85 Operating Budget will be presented by Mr. Line to the Mayor and Council this evening. The additions agreed to at the Budget Work Session are included. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Set Public Heaing for Auqust 27th, 1984 BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A N/A NO