The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1984-08-27 Agendas I I I- I ~ I . I I I I I I I- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 27, 1984 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER 1. ITEM Discussion Participation in Tarrant County Consortium for Community Development Funds (Agenda Item #24) ACTION TAKEN 2. Discussion of 1984-85 Operating Budget (Agenda Item #10) 3. Discussion of Official Newspaper Councilwoman Virginia Moody 4. Discussion of Sale of City Owned , f Property (Agenda Item #23) ......... 5. Discussion of City Owned House on Bursey Road - Senior Citizens Center 6. Discussion of Other Items - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 27, 1984 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I NUMBER 1. Call to Order ITEM ACTION TAKEN I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I- I 10. 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Consideration of Minutes of the Regular Meetin~ Au~ust 13, 1984 5. Consideration of Removing Item (s) from the Consent Agenda ..,...~-;J ,,~ ,..-. """'- /). ,.- .) ,;1; 6. Consideration of Consent A~enda Item (s) t' .:',0.4;-\ .,,""\ indicated by Asterisk (171 :18i 19, 20, 21, ..........-'P.",.-- . '- ...........¥ 22, ,23. 24, 25 & 26) !ot ,-,l 7. Special Reco2nition of Former Board and Commission Members 8. Special Presentation to the City by JOY Funiciello Re2ardin2 United Way 9. PUBLIC HEARING - 1984-85 Revenue Sharin2 Bud~et for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas /1' PUBLIC HEARING -1984-85 Operatin2 Bud2et for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas .-¡? .,-, :> --. :;¡() I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 27, 1984 - I For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I- I NUMBER ;'.3':,,/ ll{~ .-..;. £- .m: ITEM Consideration of Ordinance Ado tin 1984-85 Operating Budget for the City of North hland Hills, Texas ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Resolution Acce tin Tax Roll as Submitted by Tarrant Appraisal District v/ Consideration of Resolution Setting Exemptions for Homestead and Over Sixty Five ,} " ~' . i·' J ~ ' ./'''' ..... Qq ./ J , ~ ::..~ t Consideration of Ordinance Setting the Tax Rate and Distribution to General and Debt Service Funds Consideration of Request of Mr. Ray E. Porter, 4830 Blaney for a Variance to the Brick Ordinance Consideration of Re uest of Mr. Hubert Hawkins for a Variance to the Subdivision Ordinance PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-61, Request of James & Blake Cook for Final Plat of Lots 11-22, Block 7, and Blocks 14 & 15, Smithfield Acres Addition (Located on the north side of Turner Drive, approximately 200 feet west of Davis Boulevard) I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 27, 1984 II ~r the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, II 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER *18. I I I I I I I I I I I I I II- I *19. *20. *21. ITEM PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-68, Request of Wayne Stewart for Replat of Blocks 13R thru 25R, Fox Hollow Addition (Located on the south side of Chapman Road and bounded on the west by Richfield Park and on the south by North Park Estates and Fox Hollow Addition, First Filing) ACTION TAKEN PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-69, Request of Cambridge Companies for Replat of Lots 1R-3R, Block 2, and Lot 4, Block 13, Snow Hei hts North Addition (Located on the north side of Northeast Loop 820, bounded on the west by Gulf Oil) PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-72, Request of Dr. Phillip D. Abbott for Replat of Lot 6R, Block 2, Jack M. Estes Subdivision (Located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive, approximately 250 feet north of Grapevine Highway) Consideration of Ordinance Establishing Speed Limit on Highway 26 (Grapevine Highway) (Postponed at the August 13, 1984, Meeting) I· I I-For I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 27, 1984 the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER *22. ACTION TAKEN ITEM Consideration of Payment, Estimate #5, to Panhandle Construction in the Amount of $30,781.02 - Denton Highway Water System Extensions l~ Consideration of Sale of City Owned ..,---..../ .)"\.\. 1 J /¡ I" , l,,·,; " , ',' f ~ Property--", ð '",t \ '. .9 ,<,,'\~A~}. *24. Consideration of Resolution on Participation in Tarrant County Consortium for Community Development Block Grant Program *25. Consideration of Payment to TESCO for Street Lights on Rufe Snow Drive *26. Consideration of Delinquent Personal Property Tax Account 27. Citizen Presentation 28. Adjournment I I I- I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I ,I- I II MID CITIES 2 inch wide columns 1 column inch STAR TELEGRAM l~ inch wide column 1 column inch 1 ,i '* CHRONICAL 2.8 inch wide column 1 column inch vVE £ ~'Lr $3.00 , . ;Q {) $21.42 - $24.36 (depending on edition) '2 ,-,' $5.33 () I I I- I I I I 00 E-tZ 000 00 OH ~ ~E-t ~ Cf)~ = ~Þ< ~ ~~ ~Lf)ë3Lt1 ~oo~\O =0\ I ~~~~ . I E-t ~ ""~ E-t000C<S ø:::0"\ O~Z~ Z 0< H~ ~ E-t~ o <00 ....:¡~ ~ þ~ ~ UO tj ~= U~ o ~ I I I I I I I I I I- I s:: o ~ -,-4 CI) OJ -4-J CI) CI) p.. o Cd S ~ OJ OJ ~ >< >< CJ ~ Cd s:: E-tH..c:: ........, -4-J -,-4 ~ CI) s:: o "'d "'d -,-4 OJ Cd -4-J -4-J OJ p.. Cd -4-J S ~ CI) OJ OJ OJ >< s:: s ~ OJ 0 C!>=Lf) \0 CI)~ ~ 0 ~ Cd ~ OJ w-I > w-I 00 0 o s:: ~ -,-4 0 >< § g Cd CI) ~ ~CI)Lf) -<~ c<s "'dw-l OJ Cd -4-J s:: Cd 0 ~ -r-t OJ -4-J ~ -r-t CI) OJ "'d ~ C!> ~ _~ CI) -4-J ~ 0 p.. Cd Z S w-I OJ w-I bO >< o ~ ~ ~~ >< ::;S Cd CI) ~~ 00 LI) 00 00 00 · . 00 00 ~~ "" 0-0- ~N 00 00 ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ · . ("t") "" ("t") ("t") ~ 00 0\ ~ ("t") ........ o ~ ("t") Lf) o 00 00 · . 00 00 ...... ...... "" <J- 0- 00 00 NN ...... · . ("t") "" ("t") ("t") w-I w-I o ø::: >< Cd ~ "" 00 0"\ ...... OJ ::s w-I Cd > OJ w-I ..c Cd >< Cd ~ -4-J OJ Z OJ -4-J OJ Cd > ø::: -,-4 +J >< CJ Cd OJ E-t4-1 4-t OJ~ > -,-4 S +J ;j CJ S OJ -r-t 4-1 >< ~~ OJ +J ctI ø::: >< Cd ~ o o · o o ...... " Lt1 · ~ ("t") o o · o o ...... " 0- "" ...... · ("t") ("t") OJ +J Cd ~ >< ctI E-f "'d OJ CI.) o p.. o ~ ø... o o . o Lt1 N ~ ("t") 00 .qr ...... Ll)0 ~ ("t") N N 0\0\ ~ ~ ~ '" 0 ("t") ...... Noo ("t") Lt1 ("t") ~ ("t") ("t") ("t") .qr ...... 0"\0 0"\ ("t") N ~ \0"" ~ 0\ ~ LI) 0"\ 000 ("t") Lt1 M ~ ~ ~ M ("t") ("t") .qr "'d OJ +J Cd ~ OJ ç:: OJ C!> ~ 00 ~ ç:: f' -,-4 0\ S ::s 00t/.) ç:: t/.) -,-4 -< S........, ::s t/.) OJ t/.) +J -< ctI OJ ........,ø::: .¡.J ~Cd OJ OJ ç:: ~ .¡.J :> 0 Cd -,-4 -r-t >< ø::: ..... ..... Cd CJ CJ E-t OJ OJ OJ :>4-tw-lrc -,-4 4-1 .-I OJ .¡.J ~ 0 t/.) CJ U 0 OJ· p.. 4-I><~0 4-ICd~~ ~~O"\ø... CI.) ~ Cd w-I w-I o ~ >< ctI ~ . ~ N ("t") '" "" 0\ N 0\ ~ ("t") ~ 0\ 0\ ~oo ~ ...... \0 "" 0\ N ...:;t ~ N~ 0"\ 0\ ...:;tOO ~ ~ ~~ "'d ~ ::s ~ OJre CJ s:: -r-t ::s >~ ~ OJ.-I C/) ctI ~ +J OJ ..c ç:: OJ OJ ~C!> . . ~N o N ...:;t ~ Lt1 00 ("t") ~ ("t") ~ OO~ 0 000 0 · · 0 · 0"\ Lf'\. ...:;t ~~O 00 ~Lf'\0 0 ~ ~Lf) ~ 0\ Lt1 ~ 00 \0 M ~ 0"\ ........, ~ ........, .qr o N ~ ~ Lf'\ 00 M ~ ("t") 00 00 00 ~ ~O"\ I ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ON I N o ...:;t \0 ~ ~~ .qr ~ t/.) .¡.J ~ OJ S OJ ~ -,-4 ::s crt OJ ø::: CI.) OJ .¡.J ctI ~ OJ s:: OJ C!> OJ OJ .¡.J .¡.J ctI Cd OJ ~ ~..... Cd >< OJ ~ Cd > ~ -,-4 S .¡.J ::s ~ CJ S OJ 0 OJ -,-4 .¡.J 4-1 >< Cd .¡.J ~ 4-ICdø::: ~ .¡.J ~~ OJ -,-4 re U CJ s:: s:: OJ -,-4 0 0 t/.) ~ 4-t 0 0- OJ OJ OJ p.. ~ ~ CI.) CI.) 0 ........, ........, ctlctI~ ~~ø... OJ 00 ~ ::s 0 w-I ... p.. ~ N ("t") ..c:: ~ CJ ::s Cd 00 ~ .¡.J OJ bO "'d ::s ~ re OJ t/.) o p.. o J.i ø... w-I ctI .¡.J o E-f ~ ~ ........, o o . Lf'\ \0 N \0 00 .qr 00 00 o ....:¡ ~ ~ H o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o E-f o o Lt1 ~ Lt1 0"\ \0 ~ .qr . ~ .¡.J ~ ~ OJ o p.. 4-1 0 ~ rc p.. OJ .¡.J .¡.J ~ p.. Cd a ~ OJ 00>< OJ ç:: o s:: -,-4 0 .¡.J p..CI.) ~ ~ >< Cd OJE-t OJ("t") t/.)oo ::;SO"\ Cd~ CJ OJ 4-1 ..c 0 ·re o ~ ::;S C<S4-1 OJ . ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 04-1 4-1 ~ OJ 4-1 ..... -,-4 Cdw-l ~ Cd ::s >< crt Cd E-t ~ ctI ("t") S 00 0"\ ...:;t ~ 00 0"\ o~ .¡.J ~ OJ -,-4 rc Cd OJ S S -,-4 CI) ..... ..... s:: +J OJ t/.) s ~ ..... -,-4 004-1 ::s -r; OJ ~.z ~ ~ ........, I I I- I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I- I BASED ON 34.5¢ TAX RATE Exemption Off the Tax Roll Cost to Other Taxpayers 10% Homestead $39,800,000 $137,310 15,000/Over 65 14,200,000 48,990 Veterans 577,000 1,990 Total $188,290 . 10% Homestead 39,800,000 $137,310 50,OOO/Over 65 45,440,000 156,768 Veterans 577,000 1,990 Total $296,068 10% Homestead 39,800,000 $137,310 40,OOO/Over 65 37,914,000 130,803 Veterans 577,000 1,990 5,000 General Disability 2,120,000 7,314 Total $277,417 l!R CITIZEN SERVICES 1000 MACON STREET fORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 817) 338-4433 August 22, 1984 I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I- I .. ., ( , David Petika, Director Parks and Recreation Departmènt City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. Petika: I enjoyed meeting with you and discussing the possibility of a senior citizens center for North Richland Hills. The house which would serve as the program site looks ideal for such a purpose. Senior Citizen Services has 27 senior centers located throughout Tarrant County. A wide variety of social, recreational, educational and health-related programs and services are available at most of them. The largest portion of our funding is from the Tarrant County Area Agency on Aging, which provides funding for the pro- gramming and the daily hot noon lunch at the Centers. United Way, individual contracts with municipalities, and donations make up the remainder of our funding. Three of the 27 cent'ers were opened in the past few months, and we have already committed ourselves to opening one more this year. We are in the process of revising our participation rates, funding, and cost estimates and preparing our budget for 1985. Unfortunately, we cannot at this time make any further committments for assisting with operating additional senior centers. We are open to future discussions with the City of North Richland Hills should funding be available. Our recent agreements with the City of Crowley and the City of Watauga provide for a half day program three days a week around the noon hour. The City provides the center site and utilities and assisted with recruiting a volunteer senior center director. Senior Cit'izen Services provides training and program guidance and support to the volunteer and provides the hot noon meal. I ! .~ I I- I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I- I David Petika August 22, 1984 - 2 We regret that we cannot offer our assistance at this time in establishing a senior center in North Richland Hills. Your efforts are commendable, and we wish you success. Sincerely, ~ !:::: Hall Executive Director JLH:bk cc: Victoria Klinzing, Area Agency on Aging Rene Moquin, United Way I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I DATE: 8/27/84 ~ç " SUBJECT: Senior Citizens Center DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The City of North Richland Hills purchased a home and acreage in 1977 for the purpose of constructin2 a water tower. The acreage was sold earlier this year. The house is extremely well built and structurally sound. During the past several years various City employees have lived in the house and provided maintenance and upkeep. It is currently unoccupied. Durin2 the past two year we have taken bids for the sale of the house and the bids have been $20,000 to $30,000 lower than the appraised value. We would like to propose a discussion on using this house for a North Richland Hills Senior Citizen Center. Based on comments from citizens we perceive a real deficiency in meeting some of the special needs of our senior citizens. The most significant problem is that these citizens are often eating only one meal per day and face a life of loneliness. The house on Bursey Road offers a unique and relatively inexpensive solution to this deficiency. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: For Discussion Only BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A NO N/A N/A I ~ I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I Page Two There is some work that must be accomplished first, which could be funded by appropriation from the contingency account. John Whitney, our Purchasing Agent, has provided the following estimates: Rewiring of the entire building Replumbing Replace tile & repair walls New heating and AC system Painting (inside and outside) Repair, roof $ 4,250 1,950 500 2,350 1,255 800 $11,075 TOTAL The Tarrant County Committee on Aging would assist us in resolving the problems being faced by our senior citizens. Meals would be potluck or brought in by the Tarrant County Area Agency on Aging. Health checks and other services would also be provided by this agency. We can help them to help themselves through volunteer labor and self motivation for the initial modest cost of repair of this valuable building. City Council guidance is requested. While startup costs would be low and no additional operating funds are proposed for 1984-85, we could expect that there would be some ongoing operating costs in future years as the program grows. I , . I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I III il MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 13, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order August 13, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Jim Kenna Virginia Moody Harold Newman Jim Ramsey Present: Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Moore Rex McEntire Gene Riddle Richard Albin Press: Mark England David Doremus Karin Gregory Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary City Attorney Director Public Works/Utilities City Engineer Mid Cities Daily News Northeast Chronicle Citizens Journal 3. The invocation was given by Councilman Kenna. 4. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the minutes of the July 23, 1984 meeting. Motion carried 6-0, Councilwoman Hinkle abstaining due to absence. 5. Mayor Pro Tern Davis removed items 21, 28, and 35; Councilman Ramsey removed item 30. 6. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JULY 23, 1984 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEM (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (8, 27, 29, 31, 32, 33, & 34) APPROVED I. . I Ie I I I I 1 I I. I I I I I I I re I 7. Mayor Echols presented the following proclamation: WHEREAS, on July 25th, 1984, Jim Martin did display uncommon courage and bravery in helping apprehend and bring to justice a purse snatcher; and WHEREAS, Jim Martin acted without regard for his personal safety and well-being; and WHEREAS, Jim Martin was able to retrieve and return stolen property to its rightful owner; and WHEREAS, Jim Martin was a concerned citizen who should be commended for his exemplary public service for the City of North Richland Hills; NOW THEREFORE I, Dan Echols, Mayor of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, take great pride in joining with the Council in showing our appreciation to Jim Martin and proclaim Tuesday, August 14th, 1984 as JIM MARTIN APPRECIATION DAY in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. *8. 9. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward. Mr. Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, 1615 Precinct Line Road, representing Bursey Joint Venture, appeared before the Council. Mr. Long stated the tract contained approximately 7~ acres which was located south of Bursey road and east of a commercial tract and north of Southland Financial's next phase of Foster Village. Mr. Long stated there would be approximately 120 units which figured out to 16 units per acre. Mr. Long stated the request fell within the zoning classification of R-7-MF. Mr. Long stated they were trying to blend the apartment project with the commercial tract to the west. August 13, 1984 Page 2 PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION BY MAYOR ECHOLS PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-67, REQUEST OF SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICE FOR REPLAT OF BLOCKs 46R, 48R, LOTS 1R THRU 5R, BLOCK 20, AND LOTS 1R THRU 5R, BLOCK 49, FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION (LOCATED BETWEEN RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND MEADOWVIEW TERRACE, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NORTH PARK DRIVE AND BOTH SIDES OF CROSS TIMBER BETWEEN NORTH P ARK DRIVE AND PARKWOOD) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL HEARING, PZ 84-22, REQUEST OF BURSEY JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE TRACT lAl AND A PORTION OF TRACT lA, THOMAS SPROUCE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1399, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-7-MF (MULTI-FAMILY) (LOCATED ON THE SOUTE SIDE OF BURSEY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 843 FEET EAST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) I. I Ie I I I I I I I- I I I I I I 10. I I- I Mayor Echols asked if there had been any further development on the request since it was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Long stated they had met with Mrs. Pearson who owned the property to the east of the tract who was at the Planning and Zoning meeting and she no longer objected to the project. Mr. Long stated they had also been working with the masterplanning of the City of North Richland Hills and Keller, working on the Bursey Road thoroughfare and Wilson Lane. Mayor Echols asked if the major traffic would be diverted to Rufe Snow Drive. Mr. Long stated yes, they were also proposing a street through the commercial property over to Rufe Snow. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to please come forward. Councilwoman Moody stated the City wanted to try and blend in with what the neighboring cities were doing. Councilwoman Moody stated she was able to find out what the zoning was in Watauga but was unable to find out what the zoning was in Keller. Mr. Long stated all the adjacent property was zoned commercial. Councilman Fisher asked Mr. Long if they were going to build Cross Timbers Lane. Mr. Long stated yes, that would be part of the project. Councilman Fisher asked if there would be a road going over to Rufe Snow. Mr. Long stated yes. Councilman Kenna asked how the property to the east was zoned. Mr. Long stated agriculture. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the public hearing. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to deny PZ 84-22, Ordinance No. 1143. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated his concern was because the apartments would be within 60 feet of the residential property. Motion to deny carried 6-1; Councilman Newman, Ramsey, Kenna and Mayor Pro Tem Davis and Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody voting for; Councilman Fisher voting against. August 13, 1984 Page 3 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-22 DENIED I. I Ie I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I -- I 11. Withdrawn 12. Withdrawn 13. Withdrawn 14. Withdrawn 15. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward. Mr. Bob Hamm, representing Richland Hills Church of Christ, appeared before the Council. Mr. Hamrn stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had approved the request and requested that the Council vote favorably on the request. August 13, 1984 Page 4 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL HEARING, PZ 84-45, REQUEST OF JONCO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TO REZONE TRACT 3, J. C. MCCOMAS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1040, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-5-D (DUPLEX) (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SMITHFIELD ROAD, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY HEWITT STREET, AND APPROXI- MATELY 550 FEET NORTH OF CHAPMAN ROAD) WITHDRAWN CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-45 WITHDRAWN PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-44, REQUEST OF JOHN COOK TO REZONE TRACTS 4A, & 4D, J. D. MCCOMAS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1040, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHAPMAN ROAD, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY MCCOMAS ADDITION, AND A PORTION BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY HEWITT STREET) WITHDRAWN CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-44 WITHDRAWN PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-42, REQUEST OF RICHLAND HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST FOR A CHANGE IN THE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING IN ORDINANCE 111033 I. I Ie I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I. I Mr. Clark Smith, 5008 Surrey Court, appeared before the Council. Mr. Smith stated he was not opposed to the request, but was concerned about the exit and entrance on the property. Mr. Smith stated the street was a cul-de-sac and when he purchased the property he was under the understanding it would remain a cul-de-sac. Mr. Smith stated they would like to have the traffic limited on that street if at all possible. Mr. Hamm stated that when Brown was developing the lot for apartments the Fire Department requested that there be an emergency exit somewhere in the area for fire trucks and they did not know if the Fire Department would request that the church have the emergency entrance/exit. Mr. Hamm stated that if the Fire Department requested, they would want to comply. The church did not intend to make a thoroughfare out of it. Mr. Bails, 5009 Surrey Court, appeared before the Council. Mr. Bails stated his home was adjacent to the vacant lot and that he was told it was to be used as a back street. Mr. Bails stated he felt it would be an injustice to him, as a property owner, to place a back street there. Mr. Bails stated he owned property in the Snow Heights Addition and when a street was opened to the back of the existing church it was highly used by the public. Mr. Bails stated he was not against the church, but against opening up a back street. Mr. Bails stated that if the request was approved he felt that a stipulation should be put on it that a back street would not be opened. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that the lot was zoned for single family residences and the only way it could be opened up would be by street dedication. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the lot would have to be replatted if a street was opened and according to State Statue all property owners within that addition would have to be notified when a single family lot was replatted. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that there were probably deed restrictions on the property. The City could not enforce deed restrictions but the property owner could. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the public hearing. 16. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve PZ 84-42, Ordinance No. 1144, with the following stipulations: 1. The multi-family classification be changed to U-PD 2. The turn-around be deleted. 3. The masonry wall be constructed. 4. The one-way requirement for Colonial Parkway be under construction prior to granting a certificate of occupancy. 5. The street be a minimum of 48 feet of pavement on a 68 foot right-of-way. August 13, 1984 Page 5 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-42 ORDINANCE NO. 1144 APPROVED I. I Ie I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I- II Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he would like for Councilwoman Moody to amend her motion to include that any of the town-home condo development would be included and that the Colonial Parkway would be constructed before a permit was issued. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if an access road was going to be built along Loop 820. Mayor Echols stated it would be built only if the State warranted it. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the only way to get to the church would be for Colonial Parkway to be constructed. Mayor Echols stated the traffic would come off of Loop 820 and use the cross-over bridge. After further discussion, Councilman Moody withdrew her motion, Mayor Pro Tem Davis withdrew his second. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody to approve PZ 84-42, Ordinance No. 114 with the following stipulations: 1. The multi-family classification be changed to U-PD (Schools, Church, and Institution District); 2. The turn-around requirement at Rufe Snow and Loop 820 be deleted; 3. The one-way for Colonial Parkway be deleted; 4. That Colonial Parkway be under construction prior to any construction of the church property or the condos and be finished prior to granting a certificate of occupancy; 5. The street be a minimum of 48 feet of pavement on a 68 foot right-of-way; 6. The masonry wall be constructed. Councilman Fisher stated he could see no reason for the masonry wall being constructed. The residents behind the property had stockade fences and there was also a TESCO right-of-way behind it. Councilman Ramsey asked for a comment from Mr. Hamm on the wall since the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended it be deleted. Mr. Hamm stated they did not see a need for the wall since the property behind it had stockage fences constructed. Mayor Pro Tem Davis amended his motion to state "delete the masonry wall requirement:. Councilwoman Moody withdrew her second. Councilwoman Hinkle seconded the amended motion. August 13, 1984 Page 6 I. I Ie I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I- I anyone PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-54, REQUEST OF BILL MARCOM TO REZONE TRACT 4Rl, A. G WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1630, FROM R-7-MF (MULTI-FAMILY) TO C-2 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FLORY STREET, APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET NORTH OF HARMONSON ROAD) Councilman Ramsey called for the question. Amended motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis and Councilmen Ramsey, Kenna, Fisher and Newman and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Councilwoman Moody voting against. 17. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward. Mr. Bob Brady, 5057 Rufe Snow Drive, representing the owner, appeared before the Council. Mr. Brady stated he felt the request was justified because the property was not suitable for multi-family. Mr. Brady stated he felt the area was in transition from single-family to business. Mr. Brady stated the owner of the property planned to build an office warehouse and storage buildings. Mr. Brady stated the storage would be inside storage. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the public hearing. 18. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve PZ 84-54, Ordinance No. 1145. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Brady if he was aware of the landscaping requirements in C-2. Mr. Brady stated yes. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Echols called a ten minute recess. Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order. The same Councilmembers and Staff were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. August 13, 1984 Page 7 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-54 ORDINANCE NO. 1145 APPROVED RECESS BACK TO ORDER I. I Ie 19. I 1 I I I I I. 21. I I I I I I I I. I Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Burk Collins, 5228 Rufe Snow Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Collins stated he felt this request was in line with the other zoning in the area. Mr. Collins stated he had installed a 1,300 foot concrete lined channel to correct flooding problems in the area and planned to start on 500 more feet in the next few weeks, which would correct most of the flooding problems from Chapman Road down to Watauga Road. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the public hearing. 20. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PZ 84-55, Ordinance No. 1146. Motion carried 7-0. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to table this item. Motion carried 7-0. 22. Mrs. Sue Ammons, 2632 Carter, appeared before the Council. Ms. Ammons stated she was present to give a progress report on Kingswood Estates and what she wanted to ask the City to help with was the requirement of a cut every thousand feet. Ms. Ammons stated the problem was that the property was owned by a trust and really did not care. Ms. Ammons stated the development could not get around the problem area and stay within the one thousand foot requirement. Ms. Ammons stated that they were asking the City to start condemnation proceedings on the access. Ms. Ammons stated the engineer could verify there was not going to be any water damage from the drainage. Ms. Ammons stated they were willing to put up a bond or whatever the City wanted. Mayor Echols asked if there was an alternate plan. Ms. Ammons stated the only alternative was to ask for a waiver of the cut and if granted, the grading had been done for a street and been prepared for lime. It would cost many thousands of dollars and a lot of time, which the developer August 13, 1984 Page 8 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 84-55, REQUEST OF BURK COLLINS INVESTMENTS INCORPORATED TO REZONE BLOCKS 1 & 2, FOX HOLLOW ADDITION FROM R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY) TO R-5-D (DUPLEX) (LOCATED NORTH OF WATAUGA ROAD, BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE RAILROAD AND ON THE WEST BY NORTH PARK ESTATES) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 84-55 ORDINANCE NO. 1146 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 111080, ZONING ORDINANCE TABLED PROGRESS REPORT ON KINGSWOOD ESTATES, MR. CHARLES EVANS, ATTORNEY, HURST, TEXAS I. I Ie I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I. I did not have. Ms. Ammons stated it was imperative for the developer to get everything rolling within thirty days if at all possible. Ms. Ammons stated there were 97 lots in the development and the developer had 71 sold. Ms. Ammons stated the developer had another phase that he was ready to work on and financing depended on getting the release. Mr. Line stated that it was his understanding that the developer would be willing to pay whatever the special commissioners awarded in the way of condemnation to acquire the easement. Mr. Bud Austin, developer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Austin stated that he had paid Mr. Roy Davis, at the south of the property, $10,000 for access on the north, Mr. Tucker $11,000. Mr. Austin stated that because the property in question was in a trust, the trust would not deal with him. Mr. Line stated there was concern on this matter. It seemed to be coming up with increasing frequency, that people were not able to get approval of down-stream property owners. Mr. Line stated that as many items that were pending like this now, the City could get into a full-time legal staff if legal proceedings had to be pursued on each case. Mr. Line asked for an opinion from the City Attorney. Mr. McEntire stated the developer would pay all legal fees and the amount of the condemnation award. Mr. Line asked Mr. McEntire if such as easement was acquired through condemnation if it would be equal to or possibly exceed the protection the City had now. Mr. McEntire stated it would be better to have a letter from the adjacent property owners. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to authorize the City Attorney to proceed with condemnation proceedings, that Mr. Bud Austin reimburse the City for all attorney fees and pay whatever the award the commissioners granted. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt the City needed a concrete policy on this, that all could abide by and be constant. Mr. Line stated he agreed and felt that if this request was approved, the City would sort of be establishing a policy, but he saw nothing wrong with it. Mayor Echols stated the City had not had this offer in the past, the developer paying all cost for condemnation. Motion carried 7-0. August 13, 1984 Page 9 I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 23. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to grant the appeal hearing to be heard September 10, 1084. Motion carried 7-0. 24. Mr. T. J. Hubbard, 5816 Jean Anne Court, appeared before the Council. Mr. Hubbard stated the building was already built. Mr. Hubbard stated the building had brick pillars in front and he was asking the Council to allow siding on the sides and back. Mayor Echols asked what percentage of brick would the pillars give. Mr. Hubbard stated the only brick was the pillars in front. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked what the building was going to be used for. Mr. Hubbard stated it would be used for a garage. Councilman Kenna asked if the building was complete. Mr. Hubbard stated yes. Mr. Gene Wilborn, 6820 Meadow Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Welborne stated the house on the property was 100% brick and this garage would be to store antique cars. Mr. Welborne stated he collected antique cars. He did not work on them at the house. His son owned a paint and body shop and did the work on the cars. Mr. Welborne stated he did not know that the brick was required. Councilman Ramsey asked if the building was completely built except for the final inspection. Mr. Welborne stated yes. Mayor Pro Davis asked what the estimated cost would be to add brick. Mr. Hubbard stated between $7,500 and $8,000. Councilwoman Moody asked if they were not aware the City had a brick ordinance. Mr. Hubbard stated he obtained the permit with the plans he had tonight. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the plans showed the building to be brick. August 13, 1984 Page 10 CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING AN APPEAL HEARING ON PZ 84-52, DOYNE S. BYRD GRANTED CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF T. J. HUBBARD, 6820 MEADOW ROAD, FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE BRICK ORDINANCE DENIED I I Ie I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I. I Mr. Hubbard stated no. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that his concern was that siding was shown on the plans and he was not told at that time it had to be brick. Councilman Moody asked if it was customary for the City personnel to inform people, obtaining permits, of the brick ordinance. Mr. Riddle stated that the people were informed and that Mr. Hubbard had been a builder in the City for a number of years and was aware of the ordinance. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to deny the request. Motion carried 5-2; Councilwomen Hinkle, Moody and Councilmen Fisher, Newman and Ramsey voting for; Councilman Kenna and Mayor Pro Tem Davis voting against. 25. Ms. Arlene Stoermer, 6417 Diamond Loch, appeared before the Council. Ms. Stoermer stated she wanted to build a garage and use siding instead of brick. Ms. Stoermer stated the garage would be in back of the house and a breeze-way would be between the house and garage. MS. Stoermer stated the house was brick except for the back, which had siding and the garage would have the same type siding. MS. Stoermer stated the original garage had been made into an extra room. Mayor Echols asked if construction had begun. Ms. Stoermer stated no. Mr. Lloyd Belwood, 6413 Diamond Loch, appeared before the Council. Mr. Belwood stated that because of the location of th~ garage it could not be seen from the street. Mr. Belwood stated there was also landscaping and a stockage fence. Councilwoman Hinkle asked if the back of the house was completely siding. Ms. Stoermer stated yes. Councilwoman Hinkle asked Ms. Stoermer if she had enclosed the original garage. Ms. Stoermer stated yes. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve the request. August 13, 1984 Page 11 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF ARLENE STOERMER, 6417 DIAMOND LOCH, FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE BRICK ORDINANCE APPROVED I I Ie I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I. I Motion carried 5-2; Councilmen Ramsey, Fisher, Kenna and Mayor Pro Tern Davis and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Councilman Newman and Councilwoman Moody voting against. 26. There was no one present to present this request. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to postpone this request until the August 27th, 1984 meeting. Councilman Ramsey stated that the 75% masonry came up quite frequently. Normally it was like requests that were made tonight and the real intent of the ordinance was for fire protection. Councilman Ramsey asked if fire retarded wood would have the same fire rating as the intent of the masonry. Mr. ~cEntire stated no, treated wood only had resistance of about two years. Motion carried 7-0. *27. 28. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to postpone action on this item for further study. Motion carried 7-0. *29. 30. Mayor Echols stated that the City of Hurst was interested in improving Precinct Line Road from Highway 26 (Grapevine Highway) to Davis Boulevard. Mayor Echols stated Rodger Line Dennis Horvath and himself attended the last meeting concerning this project and the City of Hurst had asked for North Richland Hills' participation in doing the necessary right-of-way work (surveying, research, description preparation and drafting) showing 130 individual parcels of property. Mayor Echols stated North Richland Hills' share would be $5,000. Mayor Echols stated the total project was $18,000. Mayor Echols stated there would be three shares of $5,000 each, the City of Hurst, the City of North Richland Hills and Tarrant County. Mayor Echols stated Colleyville's share would be $3,000. August 13, 1984 Page 12 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF RAY E. PORTER, 4830 BLANEY, FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE BRICK ORDINANCE POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF TRANSFER OF GENERAL FUNDS TO CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE CHANGING THE SPEED LIMIT ON HIGHWAY 1126 (GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY) POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE #971 (CIVIL PREP AREDNES S ) APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION WITH THE CITY OF HURST ON IMPROVEMENTS TO PRECINCT LINE ROAD APPROVED I, I Ie I I I I I I I- I I I I I I *31. I Ie I Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the participation on improvements with the City of Hurst. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he had been advised that Colleyville was not going to participate and asked who would pay their share. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he would also like for a clarification of the agreement, paragraph three, where it stated that each city agrees to actively pursue donation of right-of-way by adjacent property owners and acquisition of the right-of-way through the platting of property. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he wanted it clear, for the record, that the City of North Richland Hills was not committing to buying right-of-way at this time. Mayor Echols stated that if Hurst was fruitful in making it a Farm-to-Market Road the County would buy the right-of-way. Councilman Ramsey stated he saw signs, in this agreement, as those that developed with the Glenview project. Councilman Ramsey stated he had concern because Precinct Line was not in North Richland Hills, but before the study was received, the City was committing to get the right-of-way and then start pursuing the State to commit this road. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt the City needed to get organized on how it was going to be presented to the State. There were three or four projects that the City was going to be discussing with the State. Councilman Ramsey stated the Davis Boulevard Intersection needed to be pursued. Councilman Ramsey stated he would not agree to such an open ended agreement. Mayor Echols stated that Precinct Line Road was on the City of Hurst Urban System and North Richland Hills would not be going to the State, it would only be the City of Hurst supporting this project. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt this agreement would be another Glenview Drive. Councilman Kenna amended his motion, Councilwoman Moody amended the second, to approve the agreement with the deletion of Paragraph #3 and #4. Amended motion carried 7-0. August 13, 1984 Page 13 CONSIDERATION OF PART IAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #1 AND FIN~ TO ASA HUNT, INCORPORATED, IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,752 - WATAUGA DRIVE PUMP STATION APPROVED I I Ie I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I *32. *33. *34. 35. Mayor Echols presented the following appointments: Board of Adjustments (Council appointment) Reappoint Bill Fenimore, Jack Roseberry, Ron Hubbard and Billy Cypert (presently serving as alternate). Appoint Forest Grubb as alternate. Board of Appeals (Mayor appointment confirmed by Council) Joe Coulson, Orville Baker, Gerald Stewart, John Larriviere and Robert Skinner. Appoint Erick Hill as alternate. Cable TV Board (Council appointment) Reappoint Marge Isbell and Tiffany Nourse. Appoint Thomas Fleming. Civil Service Commission (Mayor Appointment confirmed by Council) Reappoint David Phelps, Bob Roark and Lyle Welch. Appoint Jack Frisque as alternate. Library Board (Mayor appointment confirmed by Council) Reappoint Polly Brinkley, Jan Daniels and Lynn O'Day. Appoint Mickey Oxford to vacancy. August 13,1984 Page 14 CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE 118, TO STEELE-FREEMAN, INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF $242,744.83 - NORTHFIELD AND NORICH PARK IMPROVE- MENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE 113, AND FINAL, TO MICA CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,875.89 - SIGNALIZATION ON RUFE SNOW DRIVE APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #11, TO VINSON CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,179.95 - WALKER'S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO VARIOUS BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPROVED I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I Planning & Zoning Commission (Council appointment) Reappoint Don Bowen and Mark Wood. Appoint John Schwinger (presently serving as alternate). Appoint Carroll Brents as alternate. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve the Council appointments and confirm the appointments as stated by the Mayor's office. Councilwoman Moody stated the Council appreciated the citizens participating on the Boards and Commissions. Councilwoman Moody stated that the Council would show their appreciation to the members departing from the Boards and Commissions at the August 27th, 1984 Council Meeting. Motion carried 7-0. 36. Mr. Line stated the budget, including all four funds, was $15,388,130. Mr. Line stated this was an increase over the current budget, which was made possible primarily by the growth, development and economic strength of the community. Mr. Line stated the proposed budget did not include any tax rate increase or any other City fees. Mr. Line stated the budget included improvements that the Council had tentatively agreed to in previous discussions about the matter. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to set the public hearing on the budget for August 27th, 1984, to set a net effective rate based on a $15,000 exemption for the elderly and a 10% exemption for all qualified homesteads in the City. Motion carried 7-0. 37. Mr. Earl Region, 7200 Evergreen, appeared before the Council. Mr. Region stated he had two stock tanks on his property and Mr. Barfield was developing 40 acres above him and would be dumping the water on his property. Mayor Echols asked Mr. Region if he had granted Mr. Barfield an easement. Mr. Region stated no. Mayor Echols stated the City would look into it and find out exactly what the situation was. Mr. Line stated that Mr. Region did not own the property next to Mr. Barfield, there was a tract in between. Mr. Line stated this got back to the question of how far is a developer responsible for the effects of the drainage. August 13, 1984 Page 15 PRESENTATION OF PROPOSED 1984-85 OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING SET FOR AUGUST 27, 1984 CITIZEN PRESENTATION MR. EARL REGION 7200 EVERGREEN NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RE: DRAINAGE PROBLEM I I ~ I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I- I Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Region if he lived on the property. Mr. Region replied no. Mayor Echols asked Mr. Region if he had an engineering study that showed it would constitute a hazard. Mr. Region stated he had engineers tell him it would. He had not had a study made. Mayor Echols stated the City would pursue it and alleviate what the problem was. Mr. Grady Buck, 7629 Hightower, appeared before the Council. Mr. Buck stated that sometime back he had appeared before the Council about trash being dumped behind his house. Mr. Buck stated as of last Friday dumping was still going on. Mr. Buck asked if there was any plans for the property behind him. Mayor Pro Tem Davis advised that the City staff would check out the situation. 38. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to adjourn the meeting of August 13, 1984. Motion carried 7-0. August 13, 1984 Page 16 ADJOURNMENT Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I DATE: 8/27/84 SUBJECT: Revenue Sharin~ Public Hearin2 DEPARTMENT: Finance BACKGROUND: Federal Revenue Sharin2 2uidelines reQuire publication of notice on proposed Revenue Sharin2 Bud2et outlinin2 proposed use. The notification was published on Au~ust 15~ 1984. A summary of the proposed use is attached for your review. It is the recommendation of the City Staff that the Revenue Sharin2 Bud2et~ as submitted and amended~ be approved CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ADDrove/DisaDDrove 1984-85 Budget BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: X NO Revenue Sharing Fund I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I City of North Richland Hills Proposed Use of Revenue Sharing Description of Item Amount .. ..~ f ' Lß,.t..··~ 1\·1' J.t~ Restoration òf Fire Station 111 $200.000 Purchase of Pumper Truck for Fire Department $120.000 Total Proposed Expenditures $320.000 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I~ I PUBLIC NOTICE A budget hearing on Revenue Sharing will be held on August 27, 1984 for all interested citizens of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. The following budget is proposed for fiscal year 1984-85. CATAGORY TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS REVENUE SHARING FUNDS General Government $1,561,901 Public Safety $4,163,777 $320,000 Culture & Recreation $ 688,025 Public Works $1,501,530 The meeting will be held at 7301 Northeast Loop 820, for the purpose of discussion of the proposed budget at 7:30 P.M. All interested citizens will have the opportunity to give written and oral comments. Senior citizens are encouraged to attend and comment. I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I DATE: 8/27/84 II SUBJECT: Ordinance Adopting Budget DEPARTMENT: Finance BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the ordinance adopting and approving the budget for the City of North Richland Hills for the Fiscal Year 1984-1985. All public notices and budget hearings have been held on said budget. It is the recommendation of the City Staff that the budget, as submitted and amended, be approved. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove 1984-85 Budget BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO All Funds Summary I · I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I 'e I I ORDINANCE NUMBER {I L/ ß' AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND APPROVING A BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, T.EXAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER 1ST, 1984 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1985 WHEREAS, an annual operating budget for the fiscal year October 1, 1984 through September 30, 1985, has been prepared by the City Manager for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and WHEREAS, said budget has been presented by the City Manager in accordance with the City Charter, and WHEREAS, public notices of a hearing upon this proposed budget have been published as required, and the public hearing held on said budget, and it is the consensus that the budget, as submitted and amended, should be approved, to wit: FUND RECOMMENDED BUDGET AMENDED AND ADOPTED BUDGET TOTAL REVENUE (General Fund) $7,673,867 $7,673,867 EXPENDITURES: DEPARTMENT City Council City Manager City Secretary Legal Civil Service Finance Planning & Development Municipal Court Library Public Works Parks and Recreation Police Fire Non-Departmental 48,760 48,760 157,782 157,782 89,878 89,878 24,000 24,000 66,401 66,401 833,315 833,315 297,493 297,493 99,265 99,265 276,511 276,511 1,204,037 1,204,037 411,514 411,514 2,333,700 2,333,700 1,510,077 1,510,077 321,134 321,134 $7,673,867 $7,673,867 $1,493,996 $1,493,996 $9,167,863 $9,167,863 TOTAL EXPENDITURES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND TOTAL GENERAL FUND AND DEBT SERVICE FUND EXPENDITURES I' 4' I Ie I I I I 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. Page Two FUND RECOMMENDED BUDGET AMENDED AND ADOPTED BUDGET UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND Water Sewer Interest Income 4,461,001 2,843,000 200,000 4,461,001 2,843,000 200,000 TOTAL REVENUES $7,504,001 $7,504,001 Expenditures Public Works/Utilities Finance/Utilities 7,182,157 321,844 7,182,157 321,844 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $7,504,001 $7,504,001 OCCUPANCY TAX FUND Undesignated Fund Balance 10/1/84 Revenue TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 96,500 96,500 60,000 60,000 $156,500 $156,500 $156,500 $156,500 EXPENDITURES PARKS & RECREATION CONTRIBUTION FUND Revenue $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Expenditures THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills ratify, adopt and approve the budget as filed and amended for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1984 through September 30, 1985. PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City Council at a special meeting in the Council Chamber of the North Richland Hills City Hall on the 27th of August, 1984. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - City Attorney I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I lie I DATE: 8/27/84 IJ SUBJECT: 1984 Certified Tax Roll DEPARTMENT: Finance BACKGROUND: The "Truth-in-Taxation" of Chapter 26 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires that the Chief Appraiser of the taxing district supply each taxing unit within that county with certified totals of all appraised values within that tax unit. Mr. Nelson Eichman, Chief Appraiser of the Tarrant Appraisal District, has submitted totals of appraised values to the City of North Richland Hills for our review. The Net Tax~ble Value is $992,047,198. That value is $61,026,783 less than that presented to the City Council in the 1984-1985 budget process. The difference is the lower value of properties currently under protest to the Appraisal Review Board. Those properties will be listed on a subsequent tax roll after final review. The subsequent tax roll will be a minimum of $1,053,073,981., including the minimum of the protested values. It is the staff's recommendation that we accept the Net Taxable Value of $992,047,198. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove 1984 Certified Tax Roll BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES NO N/A N/A N/A I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I RESOLUTION NO. '(,";'; ,Þt C' WHEREAS, the City Council of this City received the Ad Valorem Tax Rolls for the year 1984 from Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of net taxable value of $992,047,198 plus current net taxable value of properties under protest; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Rolls and approved same on August 27, 1984. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The approval of said Tax Rolls received from Tarrant Appraisal District in August, 1984, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall collectively be considered the Tax Roll of this City for 1984 and it is hereby in all things adopted and approved. Passed and approved this 27th day of August, 1984. Dan Echols-Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore-City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire-City Attorney -I · I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I July 25. 1984 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS The certified value totals for your taxing jurisdiction. figures for. special-use loss, exemptions, and new construction values are attached. Effective for the 1984 tax year, Sec. 26.01(c) of the State Property Tax Law directs the chief appraiser to prepare I list of a11 properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board. These values are not included in the attached certified value totals. The current net taxable value of the properties under protest is ~1~0. 508.987 - and the protested value of the same properties is $61 f 026 ~ 783 . (The p-rotested. or lower value should be added to the certified value and used for calculation of the effective tax rate as prescribed in Sec. 26.04.) The appraisal rolls. magnet1ctapes. and listings of all properties pending before the ARB will be available to taxing units IS they are completed. . ./ I i "" I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Name of Taxing Unit I, Nelson F. Eichman, Chief Appraiser for Tarrant County, solemnly swear that the attached is "that portion of the approved Appraisal Roll of the Tarrant Appraisal District which lists property taxable by the above named entity and constitutes their Appraisal Roll. 1984 APPRAISAL ROLL INFORMATION . VALUATION SUMMARY $ 1, 018,812,129 TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE - Deferred Special Use Value Loss Agricultural S 13,928,413 - Partial Exemption Value Loss Veteran S 573.000 Over - 65 $ 12,263,518 Homestead $ -0- Disability $ -0- NET TAXABLE VALUE (School District Informat'ion - Includes property on which taxes are "frozen".) NEW CONSTRUCTION (Included in net taxable value) s $ ~/~ -rð~~ Chief Appraiser Nelson F. Eichman RECEIVED B~?A~ ~ U .I 992.047.198· 46,436,167 '7 ~~vr.."tI , , Date Date: '7.L¿þ 1/.7" "Ý" ~, ~'.¡5 ~ . "" 'I"' · A 110 V3.0 2S-JUL-8~ 15:54:52 FOR: ENTITY: NORTH RICHLAND HILLS REAL PROPERTY ONLY OM......... VALUE......... COUNT.. TAX........... 6ROSS.UAlUE... IfERRED SPECIAL APP ICtA.MAl EX 13928413. 48 -TOTAL EF SPC APP lJ92U13. 48 VAL SUBTOTAl 12 -.. 930625291. 12690 -PARTIAl EXEIFTIONS IEIWIS $1500 225000. 150 ~. II 2;&: fi r 6S 11871591. 934 JlþTAl PART EXEMPTS 12441591. 1161 NET TAXABLE VALUE 918183700. 12687 .IltTRUCTION 46436167. 642 IrT VALŒ LOSS 528903. 36 m NEW EXDf'TION LOSS 'U I" AlL EXEMPTIONS EXEIFT PRCfERTY a" DEFERRED SPECIAL plQl.MAL EX -MEU PARTIAl EXEMPTIONS ETERANS .1500 TERANS .2000 ANS .2500 ~RANS .3000 r6S JTAXABL£UAlŒ IZEN REtVlIHDER NET TAX. SUBTOTAL II Ie I 94669842~. 12922 9~6698424. 2144720. 30 2144720. 30 944553704. 12690 645621503. 10226 298932201. 12687 5560. 1192 2144720. 2144720. 944S537~. 14~69626. 14469626. 944553704. 9829829 . I#mU: 4209292. 52860303. 67577303. 944527743. 89907. 3 676953. , 24000. 16 8000 . 4 7500. 3 45000. 15 1489410. 117 --.;1 I .J40~ 71'0 m SCHOOL DISTRICTS ONLY at. 918183700. 12687 944527743. o. 0 918183700. 12687 0.00 944527743. / 2~-JUL-~ 09:02:01 ENTITY: NORTH RICHlAND HILLS FOR: PERSONAL PROPERTY ONLY COUNT.. TAX........... GROSS. VALUE... 74267380. 2487 7~267J80t o. 0 74258425. 2486 3000 . 2 6000 . 2 385927. 48 394927. 52 73863498. 2438 ISTRUCTION O. 0 OVE"ENT VALUE LOSS O. 0 Ie Þ. ID EXEtlPTION lOSS 1*. lUlL EXE"f'TIONS X T PROPERTY W DEFER~t[1 SPECIAl IARTIAl EXE"PTIONS 'ANS .1500 TERANS $3000 165 8955. 1 8955 . 1 '4~25. 2486 74258425. 2486 O. 0 o. 0 8955. 8955. 74258425. o. 74258425. 18315. 20126. 38592i. 42~36S. 73872498. ~Uv- ~~ ~ 8955. 1 3000 . 2 6000 . 2 385927 . 48 ¥c.j 5'7'- ... SCHOOL DIS¥RICTS ONLY .It tABLE VAlUE 21 REHAINDER TAX. SUBTOTAL 11 I I Ie I 7 t-f-~ y~~ ---G,~ 73863498. 2438 73872~9B. o. o 2438 0.00 73863498. 73872498. .;) I 3.yo ~ 17 C 4D~ iß'- / - f ~/ ?'f't ~J-'+- ~ I I NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND II~ Lee Maness, Direct::B::C:::::c:Ff::T:::T::t~::C:::::~i::::n:~::::~ in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.04, Property Tax Code, have calculated the tax rate which may not I be exceeded by more than three percent by the governing body of the City of North Richland Hills without holding a public hearing as required by the code. That rate is as follows: $ .3381 per $100 of value. II The estimated unencumbered fund balance for Maintenance & Operation fund: $2,064,040. The estimated unencumbered fund balance for Interest and Sinking fund: $1,595,688. I I I I. DATA I Ie I I II I I I I Ie II City of North Richland Hills Lee Maness, Director of Finance August 23, 1984 CALCULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE 1. 1983 Total tax levy from the 1983 tax ro 11 ....................... 2. 1983 Tax rate ($.28 M&O and $.22 I&S) ............................ 3. 1983 Debt service (I&S) levy..................................... 4. 1983 Maintenance and operation (M&O) levy ........................ 5. 1983 M&O taxes on property in territory that has ceased to be a part of the unit in 1984.........................................· 6. 1983 M&O taxes on property becoming exempt in 1984 ............... 7. 1983 M&O taxes on taxable value lost because property is appraised at less than market value in 1984 ................................ 8. 1984 Total taxable value of all property......................... 9. 1984 Taxable value of new improvements added since Jan. 1, 1983 .. 10. 1984 Taxable value of property annexed since Jan. 1, 1983 ........ 11. 1984 Tax levy needed to satisfy debt service (I &8) ............... 12. Rate to raise 1983 tax levy due to appraisal roll errors (rate should have been less rate that was levied) ($___/$100-$---/$100).. 13. Rate to recoup taxes lost in 1983 due to appraisal roll errors (lost dollars divided by 1983 taxable values) ($ % ___) 14. 1983 M&O Taxes used to regain lost 1982 levy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · · · · $ $ 3,448,582 $ .50/$100 $ 1,517,376 $ 1,931,206 $ -0- $ 90,924 $ 1,896 $1,011,181,858 $ 46,436,167 $ -0- $ 1,492,496 $ --/$100 $ --/$100 -0- .~. CALCULATION rINTENANC~ .AND ,OPERATION (M&O) TAX RATE 1. (A) 1983 Total tax levy (Data 1)........................................ I (B) I_C) (D) I (E) I (G) r. (A) (B) I (C) I. (A) I (B) Subtract 1983 Debt service levy (Data 3) ........................... Subtract 1983 Taxes on property no longer in unit (Data 5) ......... Subtract 1983 Taxes for exemptions (Data 6) ........................ $ 3.448,582 $ 1.517,376 $ -0- $ 90,924 $ 1,896 $ -0- $ 1.838,386 $1,011.181.858 $ $ 46,436,167 -0- Subtract 1983 Taxes for productivity valuation (Data 7) ............ $ 964,745,691 $ .00190556 (F) Subtract 1983 Taxes used to regain lost 1982 levy (Data 14) . . . . . . . . . Multiply by $100 valuation ............................ .00190556 x $100 $ 19.055C/$100 Add Effective I&S rate (4-E above)........................··.······· Add rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors (5-C above) ........... 1984 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE IS THE TAX RATE PUBLISHED AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 26.04, PROPERTY TAX CODE. $ 1.492,496 (C) Effective M&O rate for 1984......................................... ~EST AND SINKING (I&S) TAX RATE If. (A) 1984 I&S levy needed to satisfy debt (Data 11) ..................... I (C) Divide the 1984 I&S levy (4-A above) by the 1984 total taxable value (4-B above) ($1.492,496 : $1,011,181,858)........................... $ I (D) Multiply by $100 valuation............................· Adjusted 1983 M&O levy ............................................. $1.011,181,858 .00147599 .00147599 x $100 (E) Effective 1&S rate for 1984......................................... $ 14.159C/$100 ~PRAISAL ROLL ERROR RATE 1984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) .................. Subtract 1984 Value of new improvements (Data 9) ................... 15. (A) Rate to raise 1983 levy due to appraisal errors (Da ta 12) .......... $ --/$100 (B) Add rate to regain taxes lost due to errors (Data 13) $ --/$100 .............. I (C) Total rate to adjust for appraisal roll errors ..................... $ -/$100 Subtract 1984 Value of annexed property (Data 10) .................. TOTAL EFFECTIVE TAX RATE FOR 1984 116. (A) Effective M&O rate (3-C above)...................................... $ 19.055¢/$100 le(B) (C) (D) 1984 Taxable ~alue for M&O ................................ $ 14.759c/$100 $ --/$100 I (D) 1984 Effective Tax Rate........... ................................. $ 33.814C/$100 Adjusted Divide the adjusted 1983 M&O levy (I-G above) by the adjusted 1984 taxable value for M&O (2-D above) ($1,838,386 ~ $964.745.691)....... tt (B) 1984 Total taxable value of all property (Data 8) .................. I· · ~) I Ie I I I I I I Ie I II I I I I ,I Ie I /$ DATE: 8/27/84 SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizin2 Homestead and Over A2e 65 ExemPtions DEPARTMENT: Finance BACKGROUND: The City Council conducted a bud2et workshop on AU2ust 13. 1984. at which time the City Staff was instructed by the City Council to prepare the DroDosed ODeratin£ Bud2et based on 2rantin2 a ten percent (10%) General Homestead ExemDtion and increasin2 the over a2e 65 exemDtion from $12.730 to $15.000. The proDosed resolution that YOU have before yOU 2rants those exemptions. These exemptions will reduce the tax roll as described in a2enda item #13 by an estimated amount of $41.892.123 to $1.011.181.858. It is the Staff's recommendation that the proposed resolution be adopted. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ADDrove Resolution BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO N/A ACCOUNT NUMBER: NJA I .. - I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I. I RESOLUTION NO. f:"l ,") l., t',;· BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that pursuant to Ordinance Number , there shall be exempt from City Ad Valorem Taxes for the year 1984-85 the sum of Ten Percent (10%) General Homestead Exemption from the assessed value of any exclusively residential homestead within the City occupied by its owner; and/or the sum of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000) from the assessed value of any exclusively residential homestead wi thing the City occupied by an owner who is sixty-five (65) years of age or older, as of January 1st of such year, provided the terms and conditions set forth in Texas Property Tax Code and in said Ordinance are fully complied with. PASSED AND APPROVED this 27th day of August, 1984. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I / DATE: ~ 8/27/84 .. SUBJECT: Ad Valorem Tax Ordinance DEPARTMENT: Finance BACKGROUND: The "Truth in Taxation" requirements stipulated in Chapter 26 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires that each governmental unit compute the effective rate for the subsequent tax year. All legal requirements have been met. The effective rate for the City of North Richland Hills is 33.81¢ per $100.00 of valuation. The Texas Property Tax Code also specifies that a governmental unit cannot exceed the Effective Tax Rate by more than three percent (3%) without holding public hearing for proposed rate. We have not exceeded that maximum rate. The budget for fiscal year 1984-1985 was adopted based on a tax rate of 34.5¢ per $100.00 valuation. That proposed rate is two percent (2%) above the computed Effective Tax Rate. It is the staff's recommendation that the proposed rate of 34.5¢ per $100.00 value be adopted. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Ad Valorem Tax Ordinance BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO N/A N/A I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I 1 -- ·1 t.~ ORDINANCE NO. J I u,.. 1 It,.,..); AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF AN AD VALOREM TAX ON PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, ON THE FIRST DAY OF JANUARY, 1984, EXCEPT SUCH PROPERTY THAT MAY BE EXEMPT FROM TAXATION BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A DELINQUENT DATE; AND SETTING THE RATE OF PENALTY AND INTEREST AND PRESCRIBING ATTORNEY'S FEES TO BE COLLECTED ON DELINQUENT TAXES; DECLARING A FIRST AND PRIOR AND SUPERIOR LIEN ON ALL REAL PERSONAL PROPERTY AS OF JANUARY 1, 1984, TO SECURE PAYMENT; ORDAINING OTHER MATTERS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. That there is hereby levied and shall be collected as provided by law an ad valorem tax for the year 1984 on all property, real and personal, except such property as may be exempt from taxation by Constitution and the statutes of the State of Texas, and ordinances and resolutions of the City of "North Richland Hills situated within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on January 1, 1984, and that the amount to be applied to the value of such property shall be 34.5¢ per $100.00 valuation. 2. That the tax so levied and assessed shall be apportioned to the following accounts and funds in the amount set forth; General Fund: Debt service fund: 19.74¢ or 57.22% 14.76¢ or 42.78% Collections of taxes levied shall be deposited to the credit of each of the above accounts and funds in their proportionate share of the total levy and after taking into consideration a three percent (3%) uncollectable factor which is to be accounted for in the General Fund. 3. That the taxes provided for herein are in accordance with the appropriate State statutes. 4. Ad valorem taxes levied by this Ordinance shall be due and payable on October 1, 1984, and shall become delinquent on the first day of February, 1985. Payment of such tax is due in one full installment. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I ,I I I I -- I 5. If the tax is unpaid after February 1, 1985, such tax will become delinquent and penalty and interest will attach and accrue as provided by the Statures of the State of Texas including Articles 1060a and 7336, V.A.T.C.S. 6. In the event the taxes become delinquent and in the event such delinquent taxes are referred to an attorney for collection, an additional amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the total amount of tax, penalty and interest then due shall be added as collection costs to be paid by the taxpayer. 7. Taxes herein levied and uncollected shall be a first prior and superior lien against the property, and the said lien shall be superior liens, charges, and encumbrances, and such lien shall attach to personal property with the same priority as to real property. 8. The lien provided herein shall be attached as of January 1, 1984. 9. Should any section provision or clause of this Ordinance be . declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. 10. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its approval and adoption as provided by law. Passed and approved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, upon first and final reading, at a regular meeting on the 27th day of August, 1984. Mayor-Dan Echols ATTEST: Jeanette Moore-City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire-City Attorney I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I City of North Richland Hills 1984 - 1985 Ad Valorem Tax Revenue and Proposed Distribution Net Taxable Value Tax Roll Assessment Ratio Assessment Valuation Tax Rate Per $100.00 Valuation Estimated Tax Levy Estimated Percentage Collection Estimated Current Collections $1,011,181,858 100% 1,011,181,858 34.5¢ 3,488,577 97% 3,383,920 Proposed Distribution Rate Percent General Fund Debt Service Fund Total Distribution 19.74 14.76 34.5% 57.22 42.78 100.0% Debt Serivce Summary Estimated Balance October 1, 1984 Proposed Distribution of Revenues Less Debt Service Requirement $1,625,718 1,492,496 1,493,996 Estimated Balance September 30, 1985 1,624,218 Amount 1,891,424 1,492,496 3,383,920 · - ~. '" -... - ... - - . ..._~. -.....-........... 'þ.....- .'.--- . II.? I DATE: 8-1-84 e IUBJECT: Request for Variance From the Brick Ordinance for An Out Building at 4830 Blaney IUARTKENT: Inspections To be consistent with the enforcement of this ordinance the staff rACKCROUND: recommends that you deny this request. There are other citizens throughout the city that have had to comply with this ordinance. I I I· I III I I I I I I CITY COUNCIL ACTION IEQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the request for a variance from ~ ~he brick ordinance. l.wCETED ITD!: YES ACCOUNT IIUKBEI: 10 ~D .~ I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I , I -~ -. --- . -..-. - ..-- - , ,.y rPo~t£~ Comþan!} 4830 BLANEY ÂVENU~ P. O. BOX 18768 FORT WORTH. TEXAS 78118 Ò/FW METRO 817 498-3389 July 31, 1984 Mr. Rodger Line, City Manager City of North Richland Rills P.o. Box 18609 North R1chland Bills, Texas 76118 SUBJECT: BRICK ORDINANCE VARIANCE PROPERTY: 4828-4900 BLANEY AVE. Dear Mr. Line: It is hereby requested that the City of North Richland Bills allow the exterior facing of an out building, herein identified as "Carriage Shed", to be constructed of 1" x 8" lap and gap Cedar siding, applied over 1/2" double foil faced thermal board. · The enclosed Architectural rendering depicts the general appearance, which is such to conform with the Architecture and Construction of a Heritage 'replic1a, and is in keeping with the general appearance and styling of the principle dwelling structure of Georgian Colonial design. This building will compliment and enhance the quality of the surroundings and in DO manner could be considered 8. undesirable or substandard. Your affirmative consideration will be appreciated. REPlns t, I I Ie . _,t:- (-....._ ....... -b' ...A ....1f'~ ...,,~.'~' -~ . '~l I Lj ....,,, , \" II",·, ' w. .",' U" '-d ) ..:a ... I / :~~ f/j"' ;ft.'.;.( \ " "·7 /. i' ((I ~ .it'~~r-~ 'J(4 ~. I I ,\ ,JI~r~'j J 1 ~, .,~' ,.....'1...4 I ¡. ~ . " P- J>~. . , ~ ,. ! . , .' I ' \ .... I .. .- Ie i ~'~ " \",:,,\~~ I I ·1 I ! f.;. I ',1...,. - ~~ I I " .ll·M ,,' ,. ' , ,. ."" , ---. ~ :,. ~.' , . '.. . }_04- '''~7 I~: .J; ~ .. _-I I ..-- ' wi' , . " ,'. T\.\G: CARJZIAC:¡E S~E:D CO~STRUG"O~ DETAILS ·1·· ,,' .- ..~"'" .~- ~ i';,,~:':~:~;'· ..>~-' . " "\,' ,,"'\, 'Iff "'1"1 ~\', C 0 /"1 ~,'\ ~ ~ Ii ¥ t:'- II'/~ ~ L '" .......... " C''' ~ $ ~~ ø'-~. TO,,;.... // ~ ;:: ~ ø#~ f..;' '.. ("') ~ gt;/~ ~ ~'.~~ - .~ ~ ~. ~ = . {:J: ~~~.:s. õ: * :: s __ , No. 8950 ¡ ^- : -::; ~ \ .A ' -....;;- ... ~ ~ "7""~' ~<::> " ~ ~ ~ ~ ',,_ -/STE."ø-" ~ S ~ ~~ '--.--..... -.\~" ~ ~J"l lONAll" ~,,~ '~", 1111111'1I""\\\\~ IiLI TOWNSEND t SOtJ P. o. ao)t &00. .w"..,.,.OIll.T. GT. 0...0 PE~SPECT\VE VIEW , .~ 'C' "In _ c::"",' . a., &.. -An DATE: 8-21-84 !(¿ I· · .:J -- eBJECT: I Request of Mr. Hawkins for a Variance ~o the Subdivision Ordinance I DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Planning and Zoning Mr. Hawkins is wanting to plat his land into two lots and not build the concrete lined channel as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. I I I We had told Mr. Stembridge that if Mr. Hawkins would plat his land into a one lot subdivision that we would recommend that the cit a one half of the cost for the concrete lining. Mr. Stembridge has stated that Mr. Hawkins does not a rove of this offer. Since this drainage channel stron 1 affects the Mor an Meadows I I -Addition and the channel is only built for a ten rain at this time, we would strongly urge that you den uire the concrete lined channel be built to handle the lOa rain Ie I as required in the Subdivision Ordinance. I I I I I II CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the request of Mr. Hawkins not to build the concrete lined channel. Ie IUDCETEJ) ITEM: I ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO N/A ~ ~ I r I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ) Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers August 16, 1984 Mr. Rodger N. Line City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, MORGAN MEADOWS ADDITION, PS 84-40 & 41. Dear Mr. Line: Our client, Mr. Hubert Hawkins, has been trying to plat his two- acre tract of land on Hightower Drive so that he can have two lots on which to build two residences (Lots referenced above). The eastern most lot contains a 40-foot wide drainage easement. During the platting process the City staff and City Engineer requested that Mr. Hawkins build a concrete-lined drainage channel within the easement. This concrete channel would cost approximately $34,000.00. Mr. Hawkins feels that this places an undue financial burden on him as an individual. Mr. Hawkins requests that he be allowed to appear personally before the City Council to present his case and to request a release from the burden of financing and building the concrete channel. Please let us know your decision regarding Mr. Hawkins' request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, DRS/et 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 I I I_ I I I II I I I_ I I I I I I I re I )1 City of j\{8rth Richland Hills~ Texas TO: Rodger Line City Manager DATE: August 23, 1984 FROM: Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Platting Cases to be heard by City Council August 27, 1984 PS 84-61 Request of James & Blake Cook for final plat of Lots 11-22, Block 7, and Blocks 14 & 15, Smithfield Acres Addition. PS 84-68 Request of Wayne Steward for replat of Blocks 13R thru 25R, Fox Hollow Addition. PS 84-69 Request of Cambridge Companies for replat of Lots lR-3R, Block 2, and Lot 4, Block 13, Snow Heights North Addition. PS 84-72 Request of Dr. Phillip D. Abbott for replat of Lot 6R, Block 2, Jack M. Estes Subdivision. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 1-2 DATE ORDINANCE NO. REVISIONS AFTE~ LEG E ZONING MAP OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS THIS MAP CURRENT THROUGH ORDINANCE NO. 1085 OR 1MROUGH LAST ORDINANCE LISTED IN REVISION BLOCK, I· I -e ISUBJEcT: /7 DATE: August 23, 1984 PS 84-61 Final plat of Lots 11-22, Block 7, and Blocks 14 & 15. Smithfield I Acres Addition. DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning IBACKGROUND: This property is located on the north side of Turner Drive. approximatelv 200 feet west of Davis Boulevard. I All Engineer's comments have been corrected and the owner a ro rata and requests he be allowed to si n a covenant for future street I The P1~nning and Zoning Commission recommended a roval of this final I Engineeer~s comments. Ie I I I I I I I IWt COUNCIL ACTION I.EQUIRED: Approval or denial of final plat. I IUDCETED lTOt: YES 10 x I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (' ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS AUGUST 9, 1984 CALL TO ORDER '\ The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members George Tucker Marjorie Nash Don Bowen Mark Hannon Mark Wood John Schwinger Alt. Member Mayor Councilwoman P & Z Coordinator Dan Echols Virginia Moody Wanda Calvert CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF JULY 26, 1984 MS. Nash made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-0 with Mr. Tucker abstaining since he was not present at the meeting. Chairman Tucker said items 5 & 6 had been withdrawn and would not be heard tonight. 1. PS 84-61 Request of James & Blake Cook for final plat of Lots 11-22, Block 7, and Blocks 14 & 15, Smithfield Acres Addition. PS 84-61 APPROVED Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-61 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. , \~ 2. PS 84-68 Request of Wayne Steward Blocks 13R thru 25R, Fox Addition. n Tucker said since this is a replat in single family zoning, he would open the Public Hearing and call for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (' f' Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers August 9, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Rich1and Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-901, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SMITHFIELD ACRES ADDITION, LOTS 1-22, Blk. 7 & BLOCKS 14 & 1S,REVISED FINAL PLANS, PS 84-61. In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated July 31, 1984, we offer the following comments: 1. The street named Timberlane Drive is an extension of the existing Timberlane Drive. Timberlane Circle will be changed to one that will not duplicate any existing street name. 2. This item has been resolved. 3. The fittings list has been corrected. 4. The owner agrees to pay his prorata and to s1gn a letter covenent on future street paving. If there should be any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. DRS/et cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 I' I I I I I I I I Ie 2 I I I I I I I I I Ie I ( (~ KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas July 31, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-901, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SMITHFIELD ACRES ADDITION, L.11-22,B.7, L.I-14,B.14, B.15, REVISED FINAL PLANS, PS 84 - 61, GRID MAP 61 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Street names T;mberlane Drive and Timberlane Circle are duplicates of existing NRH streets in Crestwood Estates. The existing right-of-way width of 50-feet on Turner Drive may be insufficient for future widening plans. The preliminary street master plan should be consulted. 4 Water line fittings list items 3 and 6 should be switched. We would refer you to our comments regarding escrow and prorata in our review letter dated April 18, 1984. Also see our June 18 letter regarding Highway Department permit requirements. 3 Please call if you have any questions. .. {jj. t1ffi-:- RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician July 31, 1984 PS 84 - 61 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 I- ~. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ('.. r Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers July 6, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lots 1-22, B1k. 7, and Blocks 14 & 15, Final Plans PS 84-61. In response to Know1ton-English-F1owers letter dated June 18, 1984, we offer the following response: 1. The zon1ng (R-2) has been shown on the plat. 2. The right-of-way width of Turner Road has been noted on the plat. 3. The drainage plans now show the calculated capacity of the existing box culvert in Turner Road and the existing down- stream channel south of Turner Road. 4. The owners agree to pay their prorata share of existing utilities, but would prefer to sign a letter covenant agreeing to participate in any future street improvements. 5. The proposed 6-inch water line 1n Timberlane Drive has been upsized to an 8~inch. 6. A detail showing the water line an4 sewer line crossing under the existing box culvert has been added to the plans. 7. The off-site swer line has been shown to connect to both of the existing parallel 8-inch downstream line. 8. Permission from the Highway Department will be obtained for the offsite sewer line boring under Davis Blvd. If there should be any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, f)/ÆJtt ~~ Delbert R. Stembridge, P.E. ~ ~~ 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North R ichland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 1,·/ I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ('> ,. Smithfield Acres PS 84-61 Page 2 DRS/et cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician I' I I I I June 18 t 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills I 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Richland Hillst Texas 76118 I I We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the II following comments: 1 The zoning for this proposed subdivision should be noted on the plat (R-2). 1I4IÞ The right-of-way width of Turner Road should be noted on the plat. 3 As noted in item no. 1 of our review letter dated April 18t 1984, the I developer's engineer should provide calculations in the drainage plans which show the capacity of the existing box culvert in Turner Road and the existing downstream channel south of Turner Road. I 4 We would refer you to our escrow and prorata comments in our April 18 letter. I 5 The proposed 6-inch water line in Timberlane Drive should be upsized to an a-inch diameter. I I 7 We would request that the proposed off-site sanitary sewer line be connected to both of the existing parallel 8-inch downstream lines at Station 0+00 and Station 0+05 to provide overflow relief capacity. II 8 A permit from the Highway Department should be obtained for the offsite sanitary sewer line boring under Davis Blvd. II Please call if you have any questions. Ie II June 18, 1984 . ~ ( ( KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas RE: 3-9011 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SMITH~IELD ACRES ADDITION, L. 1-22,_B. 7, AND B. 14, 15, FINAL PLANS J PS 84 - 61, GRID MAP 61 6 The proposed water and sewer lines in Turner Road should be constructed sufficiently deep and wide of the existing box culvert to provide clearance for a future IOO-year box culvert at that location. A detail should be included in the plans which shows the water as well as sewer line crossings. PS 84 - 61 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I II Subdivision Review Letter continued Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie II June 18, 1984 ..... r \ (' SMITHFIELD ACRES ADDITION RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line. City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler. Engineering Technician PS 84 - 61 PAGE 2 I- I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I Ie I c ( (' K NOWL TON-E NC LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas April 18, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-9011 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SMITHfIELD ACRES ADDITION, L. 11-22, B. 7, & B. 14, 15, PRELIMINARY PLANS, PS 84 - 39, GRID ~AP 61 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The size of the existing box culvert under Turner Road should be noted on the drainage plan. Also the developer's engineer should provide calculations on the storm drain plan which verifies that the box culvert has sufficient capacity to handle at least a la-year discharge, otherwise the culvert may require enlarging. In addition, the channel downstream from the culvert should also have at least a la-year capacity in accordance with Subdivision Ordinance criteria. If improvements on the downstream channne1 are required, then written permission from the downstream property owner should be obtained for any required offsite grading. 2 The Public Works Department has requested that the Street name Tara Drive be changed. 3 Zoning Commission and Council Endorsement blocks should be affixed to the plat. 4 The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat. 5 All contiguous platting and/or ownership should be shown on the plat. 6 Utility companies should be contacted to determine if any easements are required to serve this lot. 7 The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street improvements on Turner Road or construct any required paving improvements along the frontage of his property at this time. April 18, 1984 PS 84 - 39 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 I, I Ie I I I I I I Ire I I I I I I I Ie I (( f( Subdivision Review Letter continued SMITHFIELD ACRES ADDITION B If the developer agrees to provide curb and gutter and paving improvements on one-half of Turner Road along the frontage of this development in lieu of escrowing the funds for future street improvements, then we would request that construction plans be submitted to our office for review. 9 The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street improvements on Hightower Drive or construct any required paving improvements along the frontage of his property at this time. 10 If the developer agrees to provide curb and gutter and paving improvements on one-half of Hightower Drive along the frontage of this development in lieu of escrowing th~ funds for future street improvements. then we would request that construction plans be submitted to our office for review. 11 The Developer should be required to pay his prorata share of the portion of the existing 6-inch water line in Turner Road which fronts on this development and which section is not being replaced by a new line. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for one-half of the existing 6-inch line for a total length of approximately 410 feet. 12 We would suggest that the owner be required to pay his prorata share of a future 24-inch water line in Hightower Drive. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for a total length of 861.33 feet for one-half of an equivalent a-inch line. Or you may wish to require the Developer to construct the portion of the 24-inch line which borders the north end of this development at this time with City participa,tion in oversizing between an 8 and 24-inch line. Additionally, if, the" Developer is not required to participaté in the future 24-inch line or if the 24-inch line is not constructed before this development is complete, then we would recommend that all proposed 6-inch lines in this development be upsized to a-inch diameters. However, we would encourage authorization of construction of the 24-inch line as soon as possible to provide proper looping for the water system which will serve this development. 13 . Because of the numerous problems reported in the Smithfield Acres area relative to the existing overloaded sanitary sewer system. we would recommend that consideration be given to requiring the developer to construct a parallel off-site sanitary sewer line with sufficient capacity to handle this development without overloading the existing off-site 6-inch line located in Davis Blvd. Paralleling may be required all the way to the existing IO-inch line located near the railroad east of Davis Blvd. We would recommend further study in this regard. April 18, 1984 PS 84 - 39 PAGE 2 I- , I ·e 1 I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ("", .' ¡, ( 14 All proposed sanitary sewer cleanouts should be replaced with manholes. Please call if you have any questions. ,.~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician April 18, 1984 PS 84 - 39 PAGE 3 I .. ~ I SUBJECT: fi' DATE: August 23. 1984 PS 84-68 Rep1at of Blocks 13R thru 25R, Fox Hollow Addition. I DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning I BACKCROUND: This property is located on the south side of Chapman Road and bounded on the west by Riêhfield Park and on the south by North Park Estates and Fox Hollow Addition, I First Filing. I This replat was needed to re-align Holiday Lane. I The Engineer's comments have either been corrected or answered in a letter dated 8/3/84 II to the sa~isfaction of the City Staff. ~e Planning and Zoning Counnission recommended apprøval of th:J:s replat. I I I I I I I tin COUNC~L ACTION IEQUIJlED: A('proval or denial of replat. I IUDCETED 1101: YES 110 x .~:..:.-..->~~~.-.,~~¡ ~ .' ,_ t.__~ ~r""·_*~....:....~L-:...t~. ~ :.- ~..'"' it;~.l"'- _~.~',,'~"~~:r;.:;-,,~~;.!'>"~~~~"-v".'- :':o!It~:.: ~~~?t~'" I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I II I t' I ( r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS AUGUST 9~ 1984 CALL TO ORDER , The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members George Tucker Marjorie Nash Don Bowen Mark Hannon Mark Wood John Schwinger AI t. Member Mayor Councilwoman P & Z Coordinator Dan Echols Virginia Moody Wanda Calvert CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF JULY 26, 1984 MS. Nash made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This mo n was seconded by Mr. Wood and e motion carried 4-0 with . Tucker abstaining since he w not present at the meeting. Chairman T er said items 5 & 6 had drawn and would not be heard 1. PS 84-61 James & Blake Cook for final plat of Lots 11-22, Block 7, and Blocks 14 & 15, Smithfield Acres Addition. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-61 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. 2. PS 84-68 Request of Wayne Steward for replat of Blocks 13R thru 25R, Fox Hollow Addition. Chairman Tucker said since this is a replat in single family zoning, he would open the Public Hearing and call for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I Page 2 p & Z Minutes August 9, 1984 ( ( Jim Teames with Barnett Teames Associates came forward to represent Mr. Steward. He stated the reason for this replat was the miss-alignment of Holiday Lane. Chairman Tucker stated that Lot 9 in Block 18R and Lot 16 in Block 14R, look as though a house might not fit on them. Mr. Teames said he has done considerable study and a house would fit on those lots. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PS 84-68 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 84-68. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-1. ~3. PS 84-69 Request of Cambridge Companies for replat of Lots lR-3R, Block 2, and 4, Block 13, Snow Heights North Addition. PS 84-69 APPROVED Mr. Hannon made the m on to approve PS 84-69. This mo on was seconded by Hr. Bowen and t motion carried 5-0. 4. PS 84-72 Request Dr. Phillip D. Abbott for repla of Lot 6R, Block 2, Jack M. Es s Subdivision. PS 84-72 APPROVED Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 84-72. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. 5. PZ 84-56 Request of Phil Vakharia to rezone a portion of Tract 3A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present çlassification of AG (Agriculture) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Road. I_Barnett Teames & Associates, Inc. I Consulting Engineers-Planners-Designers I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I· ,""-' p s r;~ -6 ! ('-' August 3, 1984 Wanda Calvert Planning And Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills P.o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Tx. 76118 RE: 3-832 City of North Richland Hills Fox Hollow Addition Blocks l3R through 25R Replat PS 84 - 68, Grid Map 77 Dear Ms. Calvert; The following comments are in response to the letter from Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. dated July 31, 1984. 1. The zoning on the plat is as it was approved at the the time of submittal on the original plat. 2 . The developer's under contract to construct one-half of Chapman, reference our letter of reply dated December 14, 1983, Item 11. 3. The street name Sudbury Road was discussed at a previous meeting and was decided to be left alone. 4. Sani tary Sewer taps are shown on the plans wi th a note, stating that all taps should be placed in the center of all lots. 5. The Texas Electric and Southwestern sent a copy of the proposed replat. Bell have been If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, /' L /./..-7 ././ ß¡/~ ',ø/J ij. Úz~t-µ.-ø£- PhilYÍp~. Barnett, P.E. BARNETT TEAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. PB/lt P.o. Box 1485 e Mineral Wells, Texas 76067 e (817) 325-9417 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I ( K NOWL TON-E NC LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 31, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-8326 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOX H LLOW ADDITION, BLOCKS 13R THROUGH 25R, REPLAT, PS 84 - 68, GRID ~AP 77 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 We would note that the zoning shown on the replat does not correspond with the new zoning classifications. 2 The developer should be required to escrow cost of curb and gutter, paving and storm drainage for one half of Chapman or sign covenant for participation in such cost based on actual as-built construction costs at time of construction, if the developer does not plan to construct one-half of Chapman himsel f. 3 We would note that the street name Sudbury Road changes to Steward Lane at the intersection with Little Ranch Road -- this could cause confusion. 4 Sanitary sewer service taps should be placed at the center of all lots and so shown on the plans. 5 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. if you have any questions. ~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician !SSO FIRST STATE BANK SLDG,. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I" I II?! DATE: August 23. 1984 e LBJ£CT: PS 84-69 Replat & final of Lots lR-3R, Block 2, and Lot 4, Block 13, I DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning IIACKGROUND: This property is located on the north side of Northeast Loop 820t bounded on the west by Gulf Oil. I Snow Heights North Addition ~l Engineer's comments have been corrected. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this plat. I --- I I I I I I I ~y COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of plat. .. ~ I IUDGETED lTOt: YES 110 x I I _ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I -- I Page 2 P & Z Minutes August 9, 1984 (' ( Jim Teames with Barnett Teames Associates came forward to represent Mr. Steward. He stated the reaso or this replat was the miss-alig nt of Holiday Lane. Chairman Tucker stat Block 18R and Lo 6 in Block 14R, look as thou a house might not fit on them. Mr. ames said he has done siderable study and a house would fit on those lots. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 84-68. This motion was seconded by MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 3. PS 84-69 Request of Cambridge Companies for replat of Lots lR-3R, Block 2, and Lot 4, Block 13, Snow Heights North Addition. PS 84-69 APPROVED Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 84-69. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. 4. PS 84-72 Request of Dr. Phillip D. Abbott for replat of Lot 6R, Block 2, Jack M. Estes Subdivision. PS 84-72 APPROVED Mr. Hannon made th tion to approve PS 84-72. Th motion was seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried 5-0. 5. PZ 84-56 of Phil Vakharia to rezone a of ~ract 3A2, William Mann Abstract 1010, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Road. "'..: I I I I I I I I I I I (~ Graham Associates, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS 520 Avenue "H" East Arlington, Texas 76011-3195 - (817) 640-8535 r August 9, 1984 Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 RE: Replat of Lots 1R~3R & Lot 4, Block 13 Snow Heights North Addition Northwood Plaza II GAl W.O. No. 9182-1014 Dear Ms. Calvert: Transmitted herewith please find nine (9) copies of the revised plat for the above referenced project as requested in your letter of August 1. In response to Mr. Richard Albin's comments, we offer the following: 1. We have not been able to have the Owner's Acknowledgment executed and notarized since there are two owners involved. However, we will not object to a conditional approval sub- ject to satisfying the aforementioned requirement. 2. The City, to our knowledge, has notified all the utility companies. 3. Curb cuts within the Loop 820 R.O.W. will be approved by the State Highway Department prior to construction. Approval for the 30 foot access road curb cut was obtained. 4. Building setback lines have been added to the plat. 5. The Owner's address and telephone number, and the engineer's telephone numbers have been added on the plat. Arlington-Dallas-Ft. Worth-Houston ',,- -- .....;...,,:.:.-. I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -- I .' ('~ Ms. Wanda Calvert City of North Richland Hills August 9, 1984 Page Two Should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, GRAHAM ASSOCIATES, INC. tl?C2~tiàt Adel Zan," t, P.E. Project Manager --- AZ/cb enclosure cc: Mark Sager Garry Kraus r ..1 I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I 'I I -- I ~ ( ( K NOWL TON-E NC LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 31, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION, L. lR-3R, B.2, AND L.4, BL.13, REPLAT, PS 84 - 69, GRID MAP 112 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. 2 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 3 Any curb cuts or other construction within the Loop 820 right-of-way should be approved by the State Highway Department. 4 Building setback lines of 25-feet should be provided along the 820 frontage road and on Lewis drive as required for C-2 zoning. 5 The owner's address and phone number should be noted on the plat. Also, the engineers phone number should be noted on the plat. 6 A surveyor's seal, certification, and signature should be affixed to the pl at. if you have any questions. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG,. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3387 (' Graham ~_Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS 520 Avenue "H" East Arlington, Texas 76011-3195 - (817) 640-8535 July 30, 1984 (" ) Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 RE: Replat of Lots 1R~3R, Block 2 and Lot 4, Block 13 Snow Heights North Addition GAl W.O. No. 9182-1014 Dear Ms. Calvert: We have added the easement to the above referenced plat as requested by TESCO per your letter of July 25 and are transmitting herewith four (4) blueline prints of the revised plat for your review and approval. ' Should you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely, AZ/cb enclosure cc: Lane Cavin w/one copy Mark Sager Garry Kraus Arlington-Dallas-Ft. Worth-Houston I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I (' \ -\ -J ¡ ,,'Î ~y~ , ~j r Mr. H. W. Raines TESCO Region Engr. Mgr. P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-69 Snow Heights North Addition, Block 2, Lots lR-3R, & Block 13, Lot 4 Address or Location: North side of Northeast Loop 820, bounded on the north by Lewis Drive and on the west by Gulf Oil Company Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than 7/31/84. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. :/ Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: n'~~ ~~~ , J - --.. ." ./ "'I <::' l ~ . - -... /) ,~, ) '.~' ". . þ ,/ ~' · / c. c. . ---': , t: (....' - ;d ; , / -:1 , " / -- , I ...- - / . .*' . ,. __ / /'. /.J "..,' :;OJ aI C /,/ ~: ~ /" , ~. ~, 11'" ~- .'" -,' '- -' .. ~ ~ J . S' /:"' ..~:~ ,..,' I.. ",::' · .···0 r I (~~.Q~~ /) ~ TESCO: DATE ',/ /'. SIGNATURE ......- . - . (-..) , CITY: DATE: July 17, 1984 SIGNATURE .¿J~ e~ I I -e IUBJECT: ~CJ DATE: August 23, 1984 PS 84-72 Rep1at of Lot 6R, Block 2, Jack M. Estes Subdivision. I D£f ARTKENT: Planning and Zoning IACKGROUND: This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive. aDDroximatelv 250 feet north of ,Grapevine Highway. I I All Engineer's comments have been corrected. The Planning and Zonin Commission recommended a roval of this r I Ie I I I II I I I IfitTY COUNCIL ACTION IEQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat. . -- I IUDCETED ITÐI: YES 10 X I- I Ie I I Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 II Fort Worth, Texas 76118 IRe: 3-880, Jack M. Estes, Subdivision Lot 6R, Block 2, Replat PS 84-72 I I Ie I I I I I Respectfully, I I r r êtA GERRY CURTIS ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYORS August 15, 1984 In reply to the comments from consultant Richard Albin concerning the above referenced plat, we have made the requested changes on the plat, and in addition, as directed, address each comment as follows: . 1. Zoning has been verified and adjusted on the plat as requested; we don't feel th"at zoning should be shown on a plat of records since zoning can be changed many times without the plat being re-filed. 2. Monumentation has been noted in accordance with Texas Board of Land Surveying requirements. .. 3. Utilities have been noti~ièd by the architect designing the proposed improvements to be constructed on the subject lot. 4. Owner's phone number has been noted. 5. Permit applications have been submitted to the Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation. We trust that the adjusted plat and these answers to comments will satisfy the requirements of the commission for plat approval. We are happy to answer further questions, if any. ~c/as I POBox 9668 Fort Worth. T..as 76107 817/334-0381 I- I I I I I I I I Ie I I II I I I I ~ - I Page 2 p & Z Minutes August 9, 1984 (' ,.. , Jim Teames with Barnett Teames Associates came forward to represent Mr. Steward. He stated the reason for this replat was the miss-alignment of Holiday Lane. Chairman Tucker stated that Lot 9 in Block 18R and Lot 16 in Block 14R, look as though a house might not fit on them. Mr. Teames said he has done considerable study and a house would fit on those lots. Chairman Tucker called for those ishing to speak in opposition to this r uest to please come forward. There ing no one wishing to speak, the Chai n closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made t PS 84-68. This mo on was seconded by MS. Nash and the mot Request of Cambridge Compa replat of Lots lR-3R, Block Lot 4, Block 13, Snow Heights Nort Addition. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 84-69. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. '\ PS 84-68 APPROVED 3. PS 84-69 PS 84-69 APPROVED 4. PS 84-72 PS 84-72 APPROVED 5. PZ 84-56 Request of Dr. Phillip D. Abbott for replat of Lot 6R, Block 2, Jack M. Estes Subdivision. Mr. Hannon made the motion to .pprove PS 84-72. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Phil Vakharia to portion of Tract 3A2, Willi Survey, Abstract 10 rom its present c cation of AG culture) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Road. I · , · I I I I I I I I 2 Ie 3 I I I I I I I fI I r r KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 31, 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-880, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS JACK M. ESTES SUBDIVISION, LOT 6R, BLOCK 2, REPLAT, PS 84 - 72, GRID MAP 157 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat -- zoning L-R should be changed to C-2. In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should be noted on the plat. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. The Owner's phone number should be noted on the plat. A permit is required from the State Highway Department for connection of a proposed storm drain to the Highway Dept. system, as noted on the utility layout plan. In addition, a permit for boring a 6-inch water line under Rufe Snow is required as also noted on the plans. if you 4 5 RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician July 31, 1984 PS 84 - 72 PAGE 1 SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ¡ r I DATE: 8/27/84 SUBJECT: Speed Limit - Highway 26 (Grapevine Highway) POSTPONED AT THE AUGUST 13, 1984 MEETING DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The State has made a traffic study on Highway 26 (Grapevine Highway) and made the following recommendations regarding the speed limit: Reduce the speed limit from 45 MPH near the intersection of Highway 26 and Ash, a distance of approximately 0.317 miles; reduce speed limit from 50 MPH to 45 MPH at Grove Street through Emerald Hills Way; Speed limit will be 50 MPH from Campus Drive to Hurst City Limits. The attached memo from Captain Shiflet explains the process of further reducing the speed limit North of Emerald Hills Way to Precinct Line Road. The City of Hurst and the North Richland Hills Police Department concur with the State's recommendation. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve Ordinance BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO N/A N/A I PDM/478-84 1 r;=- INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM eW 'I TO Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager DATE August 14, 1984 FROM 1 1 I I I I Ie I 1 I I I I I -- I R. C. Shiflet, Captain SUBJECT Speed Limit Change on S.H. 26 As per your request, I contacted Mr. J. R. Renfro with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation in reference to lowering the speed limit from 50 MPH to 45 MPH on S. H. 26 between station 535+00 and station 7+28. This area is located from just north of Emerald Hills Way to Pre- cinct Line Road (area C on attached map). Mr. Renfro was very receptive to the idea of lowering the speed limit, how- ever, prior to any change a speed survey must be conducted to establish the fact that the average speed of the vehicular traffic is at or near the existing posted limit. The last State survey was conducted in 1983 and showed the average speed to be 56 MPH. Mr. Renfro advised that they would conduct another survey in 30 to 60 days and that if the average speed was near 50 MPH, he would recommend lowering the speed to 45 MPH. If the speed in this area is reduced to 45 MPH, it would create a continuous 45 MPH zone from 7900 block S.H. 26 (Showbiz Pizza) northeasterly through our City and Hurst to just north of Mayfair Village Shopping Center. Respectfully, R. C. Shiflet Captain kd I I~· .~ '. . ., ,. " ¡ Ii' \. · '. . ~_:-»r:-- C· ,~ I~F ~~~-'~-=f ~ ì .f1~~ ~ . .Le./::: .mz r J..j,J.. 111;T~1 ~~ ~ I 1'&--- =-=--~ L'l ¡ : \ð ,0-1 ~J ~-- ._-'~. /~~t·'·.. ~~~ V ~~~Æ I·l~.:~ \ ~~'LJ1" ~~ ~.;..~ ~w l·t~I~Ó: § . · "~ ~ f : r - . .. \\1 ~ \- 7f7 I \\ Ii ' ~ n~t-_ I~L j) t.!. i I~. J " -__. .-l ~/I,I:n '/- I ~ \, J::::j r = ~.rP- .,. r, -~- I f !TITTrrll1'ITü~~': ~~~ f ,...~~:- i. /'L~,Wtil~lI.L IUII:l. ~µJ", 8~' - k"... ~ - f,BF ITTrllr-m~llH11 1\11 I~~~ò~~ J k1IT ~t~~ 'C¡ 11 íl:fif". . ~ ~).~~~ . · · n~.J.im 1't.:I~~ it .¡. · I ~il~ ,)~~~ . ~ ~ ~ ;J, -..\ .1 , I =r:::::r=: "....... -.L.e "'.... fJ ~ ~\IIIIIII 1111 II J..::f...LJ...J.L.t" \, ~ , \. ~~,*->+..L ~ .... ..... ~~\~~ ~~ I .... ,:tt :=: I- - . -..2.' '- '.2.1 U ~ - . - ~\I - ' ~_. == W m- ~\. T'J(" ~, ~:/ - - 5 -:....L.J'i\. .1.. J~ - ~YY}.1...I ¡ := ~_ ~_ _ ~. Þ""" ~y-Ç _"., J - ~ - =-'! - _ _ , Itl- _ _ _ _ ..._ J .... - == -:- ;:.' I ..I -~ --::::: - ~ - I I ,- ~ ,...... ~_ ~ . L- ¡ __ ~ ;:: :: . _ ..... -- 4 -- _ AJ cAt. - ~ .. ......;.... at.. -- _. I ~ ~ ~ -1 V ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ H- ~j ~-:: ~ J¡~ = ... . ~- ~V'. ' - " , >-... .~ + ::::: ::LJ-: t: "Îi ff- ~ftr~:::fi: ::I' (tf· 'r · I ~ ~tl '~ .....t.lU~;: U'rllLÌ~ ~WrYt u 11 '" "& ' :\'. ~ I I I I I II = ~ - i: I..ll[ ... H~ ~ ~ =-- >-;- .~ I = I - ~. - -Fi-LnJ= r I J "~ . ~. _t ,....:. . J j I, a:~". ~ W-;:),dU I .); -: -=t.= '1' L. · L~ ,. ~ ~- t '1. I ~- ..'}- - =-~ ~.~. : , .,..~ - . ~ ~~ - ~ -J ' ".,' , · ·~t - ~- f ~ : . ---- ~< '\o~, ..... m~ '1 t :.ul . ~. _ _ k,:. -:'~'- / ~I_. fl 11 ~ 'TlìTT\'-~ I ,,.~ Œl.LJ~~ L-J -~... -L1j-J-~ ...,. .... , IIÍ' . " r~ ~ r----.. I ... / A: REDUCE FROM 45 MPH TO 40 MPH ~-' .- ~ 1 n- n: ,-. . _ .I B: REDUCE FROM 50 MPH TO 45 MPH ~. ~ I I ¡ I ~ / I' ~~ ~J - - -- -- -- - - - -- '-- .- ~ 'f [¡TTT 1 ~JILJ , ':~I \... c 4 ... ..~ -..' ~~ ~ -~ ~ \ _ '~8JL ' ïr II / I J \.- -} ~ ; L.--- ---- ~ ~/ L,..~ t ~ ..J ,.- II . ._ t ±- ~ ~ .'- .....,~. ., ~- -~;7 -~~- ~ -:= f- - . r - t--. - .- ./ ~ ~ --'- ~ ;. f! -- ~ ,. c: REMAINS 50 MPH I I Ie I I I .1 I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I .. . ~~ SPEED ZONE ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE ALTERING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED FOR VEHICLES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 167 AND 169 OF ARTICLE XIX. R.C.S. 670ld, UNIFORM ACT REGULATING TRAFFIC ON HIGHWAYS, UPON THE BASIS OF AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION UPON CERTAIN STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, OR PARTS THEREOF, WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF North Richland Hills AS SET OUT IN THE ORDINANCE: AND PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $200.00 FOR VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, Section 167 and 169 of Article XIX, R.C.S. 670ld, Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways, provides that whenever the governing body of the City shall determine upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that any prima facie speed there- in set forth is greater or less than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist at any intersection or other place or upon any part of a street or highway, with the City taking into considera- tion the width and condition of the pavement and other circumstances on such portion of said street or highway, as well as the usual traffic thereon, said govern body may determine and declare a reasonable and safe prima facie speed limit thereat or thereon by the passage of an ordinance, which shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected at such intersection or other place or part of the street or highway. now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills t Texas: Section 1. Upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation heretofore made as authorized by the provisions of Section 167 and 169 of Article XIX, R.C.S. 670ld, Unifo~ Act Regulating Traffic on Highways, the following prima facie speed limits hereafter indicated for vehicles are hereby determined and declared to be reasonable and safe; and such speed limits are hereby fixed at the rate of speed indicated for vehicles traveling upon the named streets and highways, or parts thereof. described as follows: I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I " I . .. ''Control: 363-01 S. H. 26 · -2- ~ (A) From Station 464+94 (at the centerline of Interstate Highway 820) north- easterly to Station 481+70, the inte~section of S. H. 26 and Ash Street, a distance of 0.317,mile at 40 miles per hour. (b) From Station 481+70, northeasterly to Station 535+00 (approximately 750' east of Walker's Branch Creek) a distance of 1.009 mile, at 45 miles per hour. (C) From Station 535+00, northeasterly to Station 7+28 (city limits of North Richland Hills, being also the southwest city limits of Hurst) a distance of 0.990 mile, at 50 miles per hour. Section 2. Any person v101at;ng any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any sum not more than two-hundred($200.00)do11ar~. This ordinance supersedes all previous ordinances pertaining to the above referenced highway. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS ATTEST: 19 DAY OF APPROVED: Ci ty Secretary Mayor I I .. I SUBJECT: 'f, CY0 DATE: 8-22-84 'Denton Highway Water System Extensi.ons, Pay Estimate 115 I DEP AJlTHENT: Utility II BACKGROUND: This job is IOO% complete and has been complete for a number of months. The change order was added to this project so that the City of Watauga might I I I I I- I I I I I I utilize this contractor to do utility adjustments along Watauga Road before they rebuild it. This part of the contract is also complete. I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: I- I BUDGETED ITEM: Approve pavment to Panhandl e. Con~trt1('t"; nn in thp ;:Imn11n r of "$30,781.02 YES X 10 ACCOUNT NUMBER: I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 22, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 ~.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-546, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DENTON HIGHWAY WATER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS, CONTR. PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 5 AND FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.5, and Final, dated August 22, 1984, made payable to PANHANDLE CONSTRUCTION CO., in the amount of $30,781.02, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of June 20, 1984. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. In the absence of any negative reports by the City Staff concerning the condition of this project, we would recommend that this final payment, in amount of $30,781.02, be made to PANHANDLE CONSTRUCTION CO. at P.O. Box 1500, Lubbock, Tx., 79408. This project includes IS-inch and 24-inch water main construction in Denton Highway, from Watauga Road to Prewett Road. Also included are additional construction items requested by the City of Watauga totaling $21,085 as covered in Change Order No. 1 to this contract. Additional work included in this $21,085 is $1,485 required for service replacement ~o a 7-11 store above the original $19,600 change order estimate. This amount of $21,085 is for utility adjustments on Watauga Road and should be reimbursed to North Richland Hills by the City of Watauga. The two (2) year period of maintenance will begin on this date and terminate on August 22, 1986. As noted in Section 3.2.11, p. 3.2.5 of the Contract, the maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, fire hydrants, and other equipment furnished and installed under this Contract. August 22, 1984 DENTON HIGHWAY WATER LINE Page ~50 FIRST STArE BANK BLDG.. .BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283·6211. METRO/267·3367 (,,(Z, 1 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I C; ty Counc; 1 ,Final Contractor's Esitmate continued This project was substantially complete before the contract completion date of June 6, 1984, therefore no liquidated damages were incurred. A "Reconciliation Change Orderl' is included for your infonnation which accounts for differences in original estimated and actual as-built construction quantities. The original contract amount was $330,750.35, including change orders, and final Contractor earnings total $347,882.66. We w)ll be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. , RWA/llg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line. City Manager . ~ Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Scott Jenogan. City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness. Director of Finance Panhandle Construction Co. August 22. 1984 DENTON HIGHWAY WATER LINE Page 2 I I tit SUBJECT: I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I DATE: August 27, 1984 Sale of Land DEPARTMENT: Purchasing BACKGROUND: The City of North Richland Hills has title tQ two lots with water wells, located within the corporate City limits of Colleyville, being lot 14 and lot 4, block 2 of the Fairway Addition, #1 out of the H.J. Allen and J. Harrell Survey, Tarrant County, Texas. (Location map attached) The above mentioned land being surplus to the City needs, has been advertised and sealed bids taken. They are outlined as follows: Amount Per Lot Total City of Southlake $10,000.00 $20,000.00 City of Colleyville $10,001.00 $20,002.00 The above mentioned property has been appraised by the Tarrant Appraisal District and is valued at $7,500.00 per lot. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Consideration of the sale of said land in the amount of$20)002.00~ to the City of Colleyville. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A NO X I'· · I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t" I /'1 \" CITY OF COLL£YVI L1E August 3, 1984 Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills Po~t Office Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Attention: Roger Line, City Manager Dear Roger, Please accept this document as the City of Colleyville's bid on the two water wells in the Fairway Ad~ition in our City. The City bids $10,001.00 each for a total of $20,002.00 for the wells, pumps, land as is, where is. If this City is successful these wells will be pledged to the TRA water system of which we are both members. Payment will be immediate at time of closing. This action has been approved by the Colleyville City Council. C.R. Ballenger City Manager CRB/lvj P. O. BOX 185 COLLEVVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 281-4044 I X:/' I /" ",- \ "------ --- le(~) City of Sô-uthlake " ,..d)¡"'f··C Cr,,·,·t.·, I ,;. ,j "f ('( ~. ~ Y'I ¡ '- , ''-.I ' , , ¡.~ ~. I '.' , , . .' ~, . . I I I I I I r PHONE 481·5581 ---. " 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, T exa. 78092 LLOYD O. LATTA JR., Mayor JOHNNY H. WESTERHOLM, Mayor Pro Tem DAVID W. BRADLEY, Council person BRUCE McCOMBS, Councilperson LOYD A. EUBANKS, Councilperson MARION R. BONE,Councilperson SANDRA L. LeGRAND, City Secretary July 12,1984 City of North Richland Hills Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. Riddle: Reference is made to your letter dated July 11,1984, to Louis Johnson, Director of Public Works, City of South lake, concerning the sale by I North Richland Hills of two (2) unused wells within the City of Colley- 4IÞville to the City of South lake. I I I I ,I I I tI I ~~ The City of Southlake is desirous of purchasing these wells and associat- ed equipment at the price stated of $10,000 per site, total, $20,000 and understands that purchase is made on an as is basis. We are desirous of effecting this purchase at the earliest date possible and therefore request that your city council be polled to ascertain if they are agree- able to the purchase. The City of Southlake is prepared to enter into a formal purchase agree- ment upon official action by North Richland Hills city council. If at the time your council is polled, they are agreeable to the sale of the wells and sites the City of South1ake would like to accomplish preliminary test- ing and effect the necessary hook ups, electrical, processing and piping prior to the accomplishment of a formal sales contract if this is accept- able to you. Your earliest consideration of this matter is requested as the City of South lake is currently experiencing a critical water shortage. 1,1 i i __~ ____. ! ----= I r~ I I I I I ~~ ~~ I II I jl I I ~ ': .... ~,: ',' .. ,¡:~:~:~:: f:·:·::: . ;:;;~~:i' j :'.:;.:~:~¡:...: : ,d ::; ~ :-i' tHHJi~ -I 'f -, . I ·1 . =i-+" . ~._ : Z,::Ë~~'i;:,r~·~T~. F~l~!Î~ ; l I. " . . . ~' '. . I _, ~,., ..' ; ;:"//F;Hf~! /-.?$~~~¡TT}t::!j:: ~ . t ; I '. . j. ;' . ¡,.,.. . ,1. . ',.-": .. I; . . __-'·jj(rU; I¡. ¡ Þr~:~{:~;~~~ 7:~!J.tï::~~~\~ ml;·~~¿t~· -., L."",-- " Mnk I. I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I DATE: 8/27/84 c:¡~ ., SUBJECT: Participation in Tarrant County Consortium for Community Development Block Grant Proqram DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: The attached resolution is proposed to be adopted to commit the City to an additional three years in a cooperative agreement with the Tarrant County Consortium. The Consortium, throu~h the Mayor's Council, disburses community development block ~rant funds. As you know, we have participated in the Tarrant County program for several years and the latest action was in early spring when the Council made the decision to ~o ahead with the channelization of Mackey Creek tenth year funding. In mid-July the Mayor's Council allocated these funds. Through the Tarrant County Consortium we have received approximately $100,000 each year all of which has been dedicated to the Mackey Creek Drainage Project. However, we could have applied for $125,000, of which $75,000 would be used for Public Works projects, including Mackey Creek, and $50,000 for housing rehabilitation and/or a weatherization program. In the spring of 1984 the staff identified four areas in our City that we felt would qualify under the target area criteria established by HUD for low and middle income families. The County's survey determined that we all four target areas are eligible for CBDG fundin2. There is another option outside the Consortium, that the Council should be aware of, although we do not recommend this oPtion. The other option outside of the County program is the small cities program. In the small cities program we would compete with other small cities on a pro1ect-by- pro1ect (Continued on next pa2e) CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Resolution BUDGETED ITEM: YES ACCOUNT NUMBER: NO x I. I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page Two basis. If we were to compete with other small cities we might receive more money, however unlike the County Entitlement Program we stand the chance of getting nothing. In the Entitlement Program we virtually are assured of receiving funds each year. The staff recommends the Council approve the Resolution for our continued participation'in the Tarrant County Consortium. We also recommend that we consider applying for $125,000 each year, and if approved, $75,000 be dedicated to the Mackey Creek Project until it is completed. The additional $50,000 might be used for housing rehabilitation and/or weatherization programs in the qualified targeted areas. Planning is to begin with the County in mid-October. I," I Ie I Clete McAlister Director I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I TARRANT COUNTY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH SERVICES July 24, 1984 COMMISSIONERS' COURT County Judge Mike Moncrief Commissioners R. T. "Dick" Andersen S. J. Stoval1 A. Lyn Gregory B. D. Griffin To Mayors and City Secretaries of the Mayors' Council of Tarrant County: It is time once again to secure cooperation agreements from all cities participating in the Tarrant County Consortium. These agreements will again enable us to obtain Community Development Block Grant Funding under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. Although the cooperation agreements are basically the same as the ones used in the past, the 1983 Amendments to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 required a few changes. These changes are fully discussed in the enclosed HUD Notice CPD 84-4. The principal change is that the agreement must cover a three year period. During the three year period of qualifica- tion, no included unit of general local government can be removed from the urban county for Community Development Block Grant pur- poses, nor can any units of general local government covering additional geographic area be added to the urban county during that period. As in the past, a city is ineligible to compete for funding through the Small Cities program as long as it remains a part of the consortium. Enclosed for City Council review and adoption is a copy of the required cooperation agreement. Please consider the agreement as an agenda item for your next City Council meeting. The agree- ment must be executed and returned no later than August 31, 1984 to the Management Research Services Department. HUD requires that the exact language contained in the agreement be stated. Therefore, the wording cannot be changed. We recommend that you complete and adopt the resolution instead of re-typing it. Tarrant County will receiv~ approximately $2,820,497 for the 1984- 1985 program year. By approving the agreement, your city will be 100 E. Weatherford Street, Fort \\'orth. Teus 76196-0134 817/334-1267 I~ I I· I I I I I I Ie I I I I II I I Ie I """l1lI ": -2- To Mayors and City Secretaries of the Mayors' Council of Tarrant County: July 24, 1984 ãssured of having a voice in deciding how to spend a guaranteed amount for each of the next three years. Should you have questions concerning the above matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Cd-~ Clete McAlister, Director Management Research Services Enclosures (2) /jb I'. I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I -::: .SOLUTION REGARDING CITY OF North Richland Hills'S PARTICIPATION IN TARRANT COUNTY'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE THREE YEAR PROGRAM PERIOD, FISCAL YEARS 1985, 1986, 1987 WHEREAS, the 93rd Session of the Congress passed and the President of the U. S. signed into law, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 for the specific purpose of developing viable communities, and WHEREAS, Tarrant County has been designated as an "Urban County" by the Department of Housing and Urban Development en- titled to a formula share of program funds provided said County has a combined population of 200,000 persons in its unincorporated areas and its included units of general local governments with which it has entered into cooperative agreements, and further THAT, Article III, Section 64 of the Texas Constitution author- izes Texas counties to enter into cooperative agreements with local governments for essential Community Development and Housing Assist- ance activities, North NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Ci ty of Richland Hills that the C~ ty Council of North Richland Hills , Texas supports the application of Tarrant County for funding of the Housing and Corn- munity Development Act of 1974. To this end: the City of (1) North Richland Hills, Texas asks that its population be included for three successive years with that of Tarrant County, (2) Texas; authorizes Tarrant County and the Ci ty of North Richland Hill& Texas I. · I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifi- cally urban renewal and publicly assisted housing, and all other activities listed as "Community Development Program Activities Eligible for Assistance" under Public Law 93-383, liThe Housing and Community Development Act of 1974," as amended, (3) authorizes Tarrant County and the Ci ty of North Richland Hills , to take all required actions to comply with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and North other applicable laws, (4) authorizes the Mayor of Richland Hills Texas to sign such additional forms as requested by the Department of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to the purposes of this Resolution, and further the Ci ty of North Richland Hills , Texas understands that Tarrant County will have final responsibility for selecting projects and filing annual grant requests. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day of , 1984. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor Commissioners' Court Clerk County Judge I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I DATE: 8/27/84 o1.Ç SUBJECT: Payment for Street Lights on Rufe Snow Drive DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: On June 11, 1984, the Council approved street lighting for Rufe Snow Drive, and appropriated $20,000 from the Capital Improvement Budget. Poles are now on order and will be installed in early September. The total cost of the project will be $17,145 which, according to TESCO policy, must be paid in advance. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve payment of $17,145 to TESCO BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO GO Bonds I I e V 6 I al I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I . INVOICE TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY c/o Field Accounting Services P. O. Box 970 Fort Worth, Texas 76101 August 9, 1984 r l City of North Richland Hills L ..J To bill you for 45 steel poles to handle 200 watt high pressure sodium vapor street lights up and down Rufe Snow from 820 to Chapman Road in North Richlsnd Hills. Pleue Return a Copy of this Invoice with Payment Invoice No. FTW-626 Our Order No. 204-K 626(Stephens) Your Order No. Account No. 14~-1 Q~-'OOO $17 145.00 I Page Two I INDIVIDUAL/ ACCOUNT TAX DOLLAR Ie BUSINESS NUMB ER YEAR DISPOSITION AMOUNT THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS ARE UNDER SUIT, HOWEVER, WE WERE NEVER ABLE TO OBTAIN SERVICE AS WE ARE UNABLE TO LOCATE A GOOD ADDRESS: I Country Cottage P9900-03-007 1978 C-I0565 26.62 Alan Cartner M9000-03-003 1978 27.54 I THE TWO ACCOUNTS SHOWN BELOW WERE UNDER SUIT SEVERAL YEARS AGO, HOWEVER, BY LETTER DATED APRIL 16, 1979, TO YOUR OFFICE, YOU WERE ADVISED TO CANCEL THE TAXES AS THE BIRDVILLE ISD HAD CANCELLED I THEIRS AND THE SUITS WERE DISMISSED: R.G. Earp M9000-05-001 1976-77 C-6699 53.24 I Ray E. Paddock M9000-15-001 1975-77 C-6039 85.84 I Mike Atherton M9000-01-001 1975 Unable To Locate 24.48 Kathy Haley M9000-08-002 1979 Unable To Locate 42.43 Nanette Randall M9000-18-001 1979 Unable To Locate 49.47 Delores Thurston M9000-2o-004 1975-76 This name is also not 56.61 I on any of the previous tax rolls sent to our office Ie Raymon J. Tinkle M9000-20-005 1976 Unable To Locate 28.61 1977 Unable To Locate 26.83 Bob Voight M9000-22-002 1977 Unable To Locate 21.42 I Lloyd Weaver M9000-23-004 1979 Unable To Locate 42.43 The Swinging Pot P9900-20-008 1976 Unable To Locate 5.61 Am. Garage & Tool P9900-01-003 1979 Unable To Locate 39.27 Auto Collision P9900-01-007 1977 Unable To Locate 11.22 I Bollinger Ind. P9900-02-002 1979 Unable To Locate 56.10 Duncan Tower Co. P9900-04-005 1968-73 This name was on an old 314.83 -"mail returned" list I from your office, there- for, we are not sure a file was ever set up in I our office GSW Petroleum P9900-07-003 1978 Unable To Locate 2.81 1979 Unable To Locate 2.81 GSW Petroleum P9900-07-005 1978 Unable To Locate 5.61 I DBA Skelly 1110 1979 Unable To Locate 5.61 J.B. Harvill P9900-08-004 1967-73 A 1975 delinquent list 79.22 from your office shows I suit IIC-3950, however, we are unable to locate it. Mr. Harvill is also deceased. I Liberty Equipment P9900-12-003 1975 Unable To Locate 2.04 1976 Unable To Locate 2.04 ~ Pioneer Co. P9900-16-002 1979 Unable To Locate 2.86 SUB-TOTAL $1,015.55 I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I .. . DATE: 8/27/84 SUBJEC~: Delinquent Personal Property Tax Accounts DEPARTMENT: Finance BACKGROUND: On June 22, 1984, a list of delinQuent personal property tax accounts was sent to the tax attorney, Mr. Wayne Rohne, for review and disposition. Those accounts were for tax year 1979 and previous. Attached you will find a list of those accounts and updated information re2arding those accounts as supplied by Mr. Wayne Rohne. It is the opinion of Mr. Wayne Rohne that the amounts are too small to bring legal action and/or the individual or business could not be located to bring action against and therefore should be cancelled. The City Staff concurs with that recommendation and formally reQuest that the City Council approve the cancellation of those amounts. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Dismissal of the Attached DelinQuent Accounts BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: 01-00-00-3900 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I Page One INDIVIDUAL/ ACCOUNT TAX DOLLAR BUSINESS NUMBER YEAR DISPOSITION AMOUNT Sandra K. Bishop M9000-02-003 1979 UtI. No Good Address 9.44 Larry Denton M9000-04-004 1979 UtI. No Good Address 15.05 D.J. Fields M9000-06-001 1979 Utl. No Good Address 33.92 Jackie Fulenwider M9000-06-003 1979 Utl. No Good Address 64.11 Harley P. Gardner M9000-07-001 1977-79 UtI. No Good Address 113.17 (1977 is under judgment) Joe Gardner M9000-07-002 1979 UtI. No Good Address 30.29 John Habeson M9000-08-001 1979 UtI. No Good Address 39.58 C. Hamilton M9000-08-005 1979 UtI. No Good Address 31.52 Bonnie Hicks M9000-08-009 1979 UtI. No Good Address 26.27 Anthony Kojis M9000-11-002 1979 Too Small To Sue 24.23 Alice Lackey M9000-12-001 1979 UtI. No Good Address 20.20 Jo Ann Kee Long M9000-12-004 1978-79 UtI. No Good Address 77.78 Dickey Perdue M9000-16-002 1979 UtI. No Good Address 13.46 Rod Peterson M9000-16-003 1979 UtI. No Good Address 56.56 Roger L. Taylor M9000-20-002 1977-78 UtI. No Good Address 41.31 Saint Agency Realtor P9900-19-002 1979 Too Small To Sue 5.71 2nd Dubut (Perry) P9900-19-005 1979 UtI. No Good Address 5.61 Bill Stevens & Assoc. P9900-19-007 1979 Too Small to Sue 8.42 Sunrise Donuts P9900-19-009 1979 UtI. No Good Address 16.83 Texas Music Co. P9900-20-003 1979 UtI. No Good Address 5.61 The Watch Box P9900-20-009 1979 UtI. No Good Address 22.44 Yank Sign Co. P9900-25-001 1976-78 UtI. Owner Name - Our 277.71 file also shows only 1977-78, No 1976 C & M Sales Co. P9900-03-001 1979 UtI. No Good Address 16.83 Gunter & Mackie P9900-07-007 1979 Too Small To Sue 13.46 Laughlin Real Est. P9900-12-001 1979 Too Small To Sue 6.07 THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS ARE UNDER JUDGEMENT AT THIS TIME: Patsy Ruth Cross M9000-03-004 1978 C-8352 40.80 C.G. Carter M9000-03-002 1978-79 C-I0815 27.54 Rickey Main M9000-13-001 1975 C-6707 32.18 Thomas Discount Gas P9900-23-006 1973 76-78784 - We also 25.19 show 1974-75 in this judgment Regional Properties P9900-18-002 1977-79 78-87855-1 229.50 THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNT WAS IN BANKRUPTCY, HOWEVER, THE CASE WAS CLOSED ON JULY 21, 1981 WITH NO ASSETS: Edward Huddleston M9000-08-011 1978-79 BK#4-79-54 & #4-79-55 86.44 SUB-TOTAL $1,417.23