HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1984-09-10 Agendas
I
I
I-
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 10, 1984 - 6:30 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER
ACTION TAKEN
1.
2.
*7.
ITEM
Consideration of Issuin~ Buildin~ Permit
Prior to Plattin~ for Residence for Mr.
and Mrs. Cecil Evans, 6800 Crane Road
Discussion of 1984-85 Construction
Pro;ects (A~enda Item #27)
3.
Discussion of Rece
Commission Members
~~. /7, Ó
for Board and
cilwoman Mood
4.
Discussion of Adoptin~ Ordinances on Two
Readin~s (Mayor Dan Echols)
5.
Discussion of PS 84-70, Request of
Collins & Colgan for Final Plat of
Blocks 27 thru 32, Fox Hollow Addition
(Agenda Item 118)
6.
Discussion of Other Items
Executive Session to Discuss Personnel,
*Closed due to sub·ect matter as
provided by the Open Meeting Law
I
I
I-
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
I 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 10, 1984
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
NUMBER
I ....-1'. Call to Order
J--.~"'/
Roll Call
I
I
I
I 5. Consideration of Removing Item (s) from the
Consent Agenda
I- /
.".'6. Consideration of Consent Agenda Item (s)
I indicated by Asterisk (7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, & 26)
Invocation
~.,3.
-,/^4'~ .
Consideration of Minutes of the Regular
Meeting August 27, 1984
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
,;..-""
;;r:
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-58, Request of
J. L. Watson Company for Replat of Lots 1A
and 1B, Block 2, Walkers Branch Addition
~~
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-70, Request of
Collins & Colgan for Final Plat of Blocks
27 thru 32, Fox Hollow Addition
*c/
,
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-71, Request of
Burk Collins Investments for Replat of Lots
4R-6R, Block 10 & Lots 8R & 9R, Block 29,
Fox Hollow Addition.
I
I
-
I For
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 10, 1984
the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
ACTION TAKEN
NUMBER ~ ITEM
~ PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-77ER, Request of
John L. & John R. Dreiling for Engineering
Review of the Recorded Final Plat of Royal
Oaks Addition
11. ~~LANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL HEARING-PZ 84-52, Request of Mr. &
Mrs. Do e S. B rd to Rezone Lot 3R, Block
23, Clearview Addition from C-1 (Commercial)
to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos
(Located on the south side of Maplewood
Drive at Grapevine Highway)
12."'\ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-52
/'
t..,~
/'
PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 84-58, Request of Northeast Drug,
Inc./Town and Country Drug #2 to Rezone Lot
lOR, Lonsdale Addition from C-2
(Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of
Beer for Off Premise Consumption (Located
at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard
and Harwood Road)
Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-58
v
I
I
I-
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
II 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
I
I
I
I
II ~ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-59
I_ ~¿ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 10, 1984
ITEM
PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
ACTION TAKEN
PZ 84-59, Request of F. Wayne Martin to
Rezone a Portion of Tract lA1A, John Condra
Survey, Abstract 310, from AG (Agriculture)
to R-3 (Single Family) (Located on the east
side of Douglas Lane, approximately 700
feet south of Bursey Road)
Consideration of Change in Zoning from R-1
(Single Family) to AG (Agriculture) Green
Valley Estates as Recommended by the
Planning & Zoning Commission
Consideration of Ordinance Chan
from R-l (Single Family) to AG
(Agriculture) of Property Described in
Agenda Item 1117
Consideration of Re uest of Mr. Richard
Leach and Mr. Tracy Loudon for a Variance
to the Sign Ordinance
20.
Consideration of Addition of Ta e Drive to
System 36
II
I
I-
I
I
I
1
:1
-I
:1.
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 10, 1984
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
NUMBER
*
*~
-", ....,.
*z3'~ .
//~
*24.
~r
*
*2~:
ITEM
Consideration of Authorization of Transfer
of Funds for Renovation of House on Bursev
Road for Senior Citizens Center
ACTION TAKEN
Consideration of Ordinance Creatin2 the
Position of Alternate Civil Service
Commissioner
Consideration of Partial Pavment~ Estimate
#l~ to Gibbons Construction Company in the
amount of $61~921.95-Calloway Acres Street
and Draina2e Improvements
Consideration of Partial Pavment~ Estimate
#2~ to M. A. Vinson Construction Company in
the amount of $47~543.31-Walker's Branch
Draina2e Imnrovements
Consideration of Bids for Oversizin Water
and Sewer Mains for Oak Hills Subdivision
Consideration of Bids for Streets. Curb and
Gutter for Oak Hills Subdivision
/.,
Consideration of 1984-85 Construction
Proiects
28. Citizen Presentation
29. Adiournment
I
I
lie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
r1
I
City of J(örth Richland HiUs, Texas
~.~;.'~
P:t'~
~
TO:
Rodger Line
City Manager
DATE: September 6, 1984
FROM: Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Platting & Zoning Cases for City Council September 10, 1984
PS 84-58 Request of J. L. Watson Company for
replat of Lots 1A & IB, Block 2,
Walker's Branch Addition.
PS 84-70 Request of Collins & Colgan for final
plat of Blocks 27 thru 32, Fox Hollow
Addition.
PS 84-71 Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lots 4R-6R, Block 10 &
Lots 8R & 9R, Block 29, Fox Hollow
Addition.
PS 84-77ER
Request of John L. & John R. Dreiling
for engineering review of the recorded
final ,plat of Royal Oaks Addition.
PZ 84-52
Request of Mr. & Mrs. Doyne S. Byrd
for an appeal hearing on their request
to rezone Lot 3R, Block 23, Clearview
Addition, from its present
classification of C-l (Commercial) to
C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos.
This property is located on the south
side of Maplewood Drive at Grapevine
Highway.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TX 76118
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Page 2
PZ 84-58
PZ 84-59
CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
Request of Northeast Drug, Inc./ Town
and Country Drug 12 to rezone Lot lOR,
Lonsdale Addition, from its present
classification of C-2 (Commercial) to
C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off
premise consumption. This property is
located at the northeast corner of
Davis Boulevard and Harwood Road.
Request o~ F. Wayne Martin to rezone a
portion of Tract 1AlA, John Condra
Survey, Abstract 310, from its present
classification of AG (Agriculture) to
R-3 (Single Family). This property is
located on the east side of Douglas
Lane, approximately 700 feet south of
Bursey Road.
Consideration of amending the zoning
map by correcting a clerical error on
all property north of Bursey Road
within the unplatted area known as
Green Valley Country Estates from R-l
(Single Family) back to the correct
designation of AG (Agriculture).
1-2
LOT A
. . . . . 1300<
ZONING MAP OF NORTH RleRLAND BILLS
AC
UP CWlREIIIT TMROUGH ORDllllAIIICE
1085 OR
......... LAST .DlI6.UICE LISTED.III REVISION !ROCK.
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
Ie
I
, .
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - AUGUST 27, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
I.
Mayor Echols called the meeting to order August 27, 1984,
at 7:30 p.m.
2.
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
Jim Kenna
Virginia Moody
Jim Ramsey
Present:
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
Gene Riddle
Richard Albin
Lee Maness
Press:
Mark England
David Doremus
Karin Gregory
Absent:
Harold Newman
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
City Attorney
Director Public Works/Utilities
City Engineer
Finance Director
Mid Cities Daily News
Northeast Chronicle
Citizens Journal
Councilman
3.
The invocation was given by Councilman Kenna.
4.
Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to approve the minutes of the August 13, 1984 meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
5.
Councilwoman Moody removed items 17 and 18. Mayor Pro Tem
Davis removed item 23.
6.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to
approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 6-0.
~
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 13, 1984
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
REMOVING ITEM (S)
FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM(S) INDICATED
BY ASTERISK (19, 20,
21, 22, 24, 25 & 26)
APPROVED
I·
I
Ie 7.
I 8.
I 9.
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I 10.
I
I
I
I
'Ie
I
No one was present - will be presented later
Joy Funiciello, representing the United Way Volunteers of
North Richland Hills, presented the City with a United Way
Flag. Ms. Funiciello asked that the City display the flag on
the pole in front of City Hall or in a public place.
Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and asked Mr. Line to
present the proposed 1984-85 Revenue Sharing Budget.
Mr. Line stated that the proposal for the expenditure of funds
in the Revenue Sharing Budget for 1984-85, plus hold-over funds
from the present year, which had ~~t ye~ been spent. Mr.
Line stated the total amount was ~~?~OOO~.,~~ich was to be
allocated for relocation of Fire Station No.~"--l·-afid-· purchase
of a pumper truck for the Fire Department.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of
the proposed Revenue Sharing Budget to please come forward.
No one appeared.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to
the proposed budget to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the
public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
approve the Revenue Sharing Budget for 1984-85 as proposed.
Motion carried 6-0.
Mayor Echols opened the Public hearing and requested Mr. Line
present the proposed 1984-85 Operating Budget.
Mr. Line stated that in general terms the proposed budget for
1984-85 was $16,878,364 which consisted of General Fund,
$7,673,867; Utility Fund $5,945,801; General Debt Service Fund
$1,493,996; Utility Debt Fund $1,558,200; Park and Library
Fund $50,000; Promotional Fund $156,000. Mr. Line stated
that in the General Fund, which was mostly tax supported and
was of most interest to the citizens, included several program
improvements; establishment of a separate Department of
Planning and Development to try and help accommodate the
phenomenal growth that the City had been experiencing. Mr.
Line stated that most of the additional money for 1984-85
would go into public safety, which would include five
additional patrol officers to establish a new patrol beat, two
additional clerks which would relieve patrol officers from
clerical work and an additional school crossing guard for
Harwood and Grapevine Highway intersection. Mr. Line stated
Page 2
August 27, 1984
SPECIAL RECOGNITION
OF FORMER BOARD AND
COMMISSION MEMBERS
SPECIAL PRESENTATION
TO THE CITY BY JOY
FUNICIELLO REGARDING
UNITED WAY
PUBLIC HEARING -
1984-85 REVENUE
SHARING BUDGET FOR
THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
APPROVED
7J-: f'-~ C)
Ô~ /JÒ ðï:rf:..\
C',J .:~ .f
PUBLIC HEARING -
1984-85 OPERATING
BUDGET FOR THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
that there would be two additional employees in the Park and
Recreation Department for improved park maintenance and an
additional Public Works crew for better storm drainage work,
ditch cleaning and mowing.
Mr. Line stated that the proposed budget for 1984-85 did
contemplate a reduction of the tax rate of approximately 30%
from $0.50 per $100.00 valuation to 34.5¢ per $100.00
valuation.
Mayor Echols stated he felt he could speak for the entire
Council in saying that Mr. Line and the Staff did an excellent
job in putting the budget together.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of
the proposed budget.
No one appeared.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to the proposed budget.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the
public hearing.
11. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Ordinance No. 1148.
Motion carried 6-0.
12. Mr. Line stated that Tarrant Appraisal District did a complete
reappraisal on real property in Tarrant County and the taxable
values in North Richland Hills increased substantially. Mr.
Line stated net taxable value for next year would be
$992,047,198 plus an additional amount, the precise amount
of which had not been determined because there were several
pieces of property that the value assigned by Tarrant Appraisal
District had been challenged.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve Resolution No. 84-23.
Motion carried 6-0.
13. Mr. Line stated the exemption for over sixty-five had been
increased from $12,730 to $15,000 plus a ten percent general
homestead exemption per residence of the appraised value of
the property, with a minimum of $5,000 per residence.
Councilman Kenna stated he would like for the Council to add
$15,000 exemption for the disabled persons in the City.
August 27, 1984
Page 3
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE ADOPTING
1984-85 OPERATING
BUDGET FOR THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 1148
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
TAX ROLL AS SUBMITTED
BY TARRANT APPRAISAL
DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 84-23
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION SETTING
EXEMPTIONS FOR
HOMESTEAD AND OVER
SIXTY-FIVE
RESOLUTION 84-24
APPROVED
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Councilman Kenna stated that Tarrant Appraisal District
showed there were 134 currently registered which would amount
to $7,300 expense to the City.
Mr. McEntire presented the following resolution:
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas that pursuant to Ordinance Number
499, there shall be exempt from City Ad Valorem Taxes for the
year 1984-85 the sum of Ten Percent (10%) General Homestead
Exemption from the assessed value of any exclusively
residential homestead within the City occupied by its owner;
and/or the sum of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000) from the
assessed value of any exclusively residential homestead within
the City occupied by an owner who is sixty-five (65) years of
age or older, as of January 1st of such year;
Mr. McEntire stated that the following should be
inserted: and/or the sum of $15,000 from the assessed value
of any exclusively residential homestead within the City
occupied by an owner who is disabled
within the meaning of Section 11.13(m) of the Property Tax
Code of the State of Texas, as of January 1st of such tax
year, provided by the terms and conditions set forth in Texas
Property Tax Code and in said Ordinance are fully complied
with.
Mr. Line stated the Council would need to authorize the staff,
if the resolution was approved to include the exemption for
the disabled, to adjust the contingency allowance because the
budget would be about $7,000 out of balance with the change.
Mr. Ralph Thrasher, 6704 Starnes Road appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Thrasher stated that he felt the $15,000 was a good goal
and asked about the 10% of the appraised value.
Mayor Echols stated that everyone that had a homestead would
take off 10% and then take off the $15,000 exemption for the
over sixty-five. Mayor Echols stated that if the total
proposal was agreed on, the next step would be to take off
$15,000 for the total disabled.
Mr. Thrasher stated he had run a survey on surrounding cities
and most of them were going to allow $50,000 for over sixty-
five.
Mayor Echols stated that he knew Tarrant County and Tarrant
County Junior College went to $50,000, but was not aware of
what the other cities were doing.
August 27, 1984
Page 4
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Thrasher stated Haltom City and Richland Hills were going
to try for $50,000; Watauga did not know; Hurst 20% but not
less than $5,000; Colleyville was going to $40,000 and Euless
undecided. Mr. Thrasher asked that the City give the senior
citizens a better break.
Mayor Echols stated that the total exemption for the senior
citizen, if they had a homestead, would be $20,000.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Resolution No. 84-24.
Motion carried 6-0.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
adjust the Contingency Fund to an equal amount needed for the
$15,000 exemption for disabled citizens.
Motion carried 6-0.
14. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve Ordinance No. 1149, setting the tax rate at 34.5¢.
Motion carried 6-0.
15. Mr. Ray Porter, 4830 Blaney, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Porter stated he was asking for a variance because he was
attempting to construct a storage shed in conformance with the
main property.
Councilwoman Moody asked what the square footage of the
building would be.
Mr. Porter stated it would be about 20' by 20'.
Councilwoman Moody stated the drawing appeared to look like a
garage. Would it be used for a garage?
Mr. Porter stated no.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the storage shed would be visible
from the street.
Mr. Porter stated no, only the roof could be seen.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if the building would be stained or
natural wood.
August 27, 1984
Page 5
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE SETTING THE
TAX RATE AND
DISTRIBUTION TO
GENERAL AND DEBT
SERVICE FUNDS
ORDINANCE NO. 1149
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF MR. RAY E.
PORTER, 4830 BLANEY
FOR A VARIANCE TO THE
BRICK ORDINANCE
APPROVED
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Porter stated it would be natural wood.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve the request.
Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilmen Kenna,
Ramsey, Fisher and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for;
Councilwoman Moody voting against.
16. Mr. Hubert Hawkins, 7269 Glenview, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Hawkins stated he was asking for a variance to the Sub-
division Ordinance that would require him to build a 40 foot
concrete lined drainage channel at a cost of approximately
$34,000.
Mayor Echols presented the following comments from the staff:
Mr. Hawkins is wanting to plat his land into two lots and not
build the concrete-lined channel as required by the
Subdivision Ordinance. We had told Mr. Stembridge that if Mr.
Hawkins would plat his land into a one lot subdivision that we
would recommend that the City pay one-half of the cost for the
concrete lining. Mr. Stembridge has stated that Mr. Hawkins
does not approve of this offer. Since this drainage channel
strongly affects the Morgan Meadows Addition and the channel
is only built for a ten year capacity rain at this time, we
would strongly urge that you deny this request and require the
concrete lined channel be built to handle the 100 year capacity
rain as required in the Subdivision Ordinance.
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Hawkins if that was a fair representa-
tion of his position.
Mr. Hawkins stated it would not be a feasible situation. Mr.
Hawkins stated the cost would be approximately $34,000 and it
was not feasible for only 2 lots.
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Hawkins if he understood why the
requirement was in the Subdivision Ordinance.
Mr. Hawkins stated he understood, if there was a subdivision
involved but not for just 2 lots.
Mayor Echols stated that if the City did not get a continuance
of the channel, then all the channels above it was lost.
Mr. Hawkins stated the channel was not lost from Chapman Road
to Loop 820.
August 27, 1984
Page 6
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF MR. HUBERT
HAWKINS FOR A
VARIANCE TO THE
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
DENIED
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mayor Echols stated that if the channel was not completed the
water could not flow through it. Mayor Echols stated the CIP
Committee had just discussed the expenditure of three quarters
of a million dollars at least in Morgan Meadows and this was a
vital part of the water that was coming down to try and get it
into the channels that were built and going to be built.
Mr. Hawking stated there was no way he could afford to build
the channel.
Mayor Echols stated the staff wanted to try and figure out
some way that the cost could be shared.
Mr. Hawking stated he could not even afford to pave the bottom
of the channel.
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Hawkins if he would be willing to
dedicate a drainage easement to the City.
Mr. Line stated that the City already had an easement from Mr.
Hawkins. Mr. Line stated the easement was acquired in
connection with the construction of the Morgan Meadows West
channel.
Mr. Hawkins stated that the easement was acquired by the City
in January, 1983.
Mayor Echols asked if the earthern channel was in place on the
property.
Mr. Line stated the earthern channel was there, but it was not
concrete-lined as required by the Subdivision Ordinance when a
piece of property was sub-divided. Mr. Line stated the
channel had to be concrete lined so that it was capable of
handling a 100 year flood. Mr. Line stated that whatever the
outcome of this request, the channel needed to be lined. Mr.
Line stated that the City was talking about spending $750,000
to correct a situation that was created years ago, because no
one anticipated these kinds of problems. Mr. Line stated that
if the Council wanted to relieve Mr. Hawkins of the obligation
of lining the channel, he felt that $34,000 should be
appropriated to pave the channel because it needed to be done.
Mr. Line stated that Mr. Hawkins had been offered a compromise
if he took himself out of the position of being a developer
even though it was only one lot, he was still considered to be
a developer. Mr. Line stated the Subdivision Ordinance did
not specify one lot or ten lots as being a developer. It
stated "when the property was sub-divided".
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Hawkins if he was going to live
in one of the houses he planned to build.
Mr. Hawkins stated he was going to live in one and sell the
other.
August 27, 1984
Page 7
I·
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to
deny the request, but the City continue to work with Mr.
Hawkins to see if there was something feasible that could be
worked out.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he wanted it to be on record that
he did not want the City to get in a posture of developing
land for someone.
Motion carried 6-0.
17. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve PS 84-16.
Councilwoman Moody asked if item #12 in the City Engineers'
letter had been met.
Mr. Albin stated the money had been allocated for the
construction of the line and the question was how much was the
developer going to participate. Mr. Albin stated he had
recommended the developer participate in the amount equivalent
to an 8 inch line.
Councilwoman Moody asked if item #13 had been agreed upon.
Mr. Albin stated yes, the developer would construct the off-
site sewer line.
Councilman Ramsey stated that just as a point of
clarification, this was a recommendation from the Planning
and Zoning Commission and their recommendation was subject to
the developer meeting all the engineering comments.
Councilman Ramsey stated the Council was just approving the
Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation which
included all the comments being met. Councilman Ramsey
stated all the requirements had been met and that was why it
was a consent item.
Motion carried 6-0.
18. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve PS 84-68.
Councilwoman Moody stated she understood there had been some
problems with the alignment of Holiday Lane. Councilwoman
Moody asked if the problem had been ratified and did it
meet the Masterplan Thoroughfare Map.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if this was not the purpose of the
replat.
Mayor Echols stated it was the realignment of the south end of
Holiday Lane in order to get an eleven foot mismatch. Mayor
Echols stated he thought what Councilwoman Moody was referring
to was the north end of Holiday Lane.
August 27, 1984
Page 8
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-61, REQUEST OF
JAMES & BLAKE COOK
FOR FINAL PLAT OF
LOTS 11-22, BLOCK 7,
AND BLOCKS 14 & 15,
SMITHFIELD ACRES
ADDITION (LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF
TURNER DRIVE, APPROX-
IMATELY 200 FEET WEST
OF DAVIS BOULEVARD)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-68, REQUEST OF
WAYNE STEWART FOR
REPLAT OF BLOCKS 13R
THRU 25R, FOX HOLLOW
ADDITION (LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF
CHAPMAN ROAD AND
BOUNDED ON THE WEST
BY RICHFIELD PARK AND
ON THE SOUTH BY NORTH
PARK ESTATES AND FOX
HOLLOW ADDITION,
FIRST FILING)
APPROVED
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I-
I
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that when the plat was presented to
the Council previously, there was no Master Thoroughfare Plan
in hand.
Mr. Horvath stated that the plat showed 1F-8 zoning and when
it was previously approved by Council, there was a stipulation
of 1,500 square feet. Mr. Horvath stated he would check the
Council minutes of the meeting for verification.
Mayor Echols stated one of his concerns was that a 60 foot
right-of-way was shown for the street and at the present time
it showed a 68 foot right-of-way. Would this pose a problem?
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the plan was approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission at the time of the original
platting and the Council could not require the developer to
give additional right-of-way for a replat.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the original plat was approved in
1983.
Mayor Echols stated his point was that the plat was before the
Council again.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the only reason the plat was back
before the Council was to realign the south end.
Mayor Echols stated there were other concerns.
Councilman Ramsey asked if he was referring to Chapman Road.
Mayor Echols stated no.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that on the proposed Thoroughfare
Plan it showed Holiday Lane to be a 68 foot right-of-way and
the plat was approved long before the proposed Thoroughfare
Plan was drawn up. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it would be
unfair to the applicant to require an additional 8 foot
right-of-way. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the preliminary plan
and final plat was approved prior to any Thoroughfare Plan
proposal. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the developer had met
the Subdivision Ordinance.
Mayor Echols stated he felt a lot of hard questions as the
Master Plan was pursued.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it was still a proposed Thorough-
fare Plan and he did not want to subject the City to
litigation by forcing someone to dedicate right-of-way when
the Subdivision Ordinance had not been changed.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis called for the question.
Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Fisher,
Kenna and Ramsey and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for;
Councilwoman Moody voting against.
August 27, 1984
Page 9
I·
I
Ie *19.
I
I
I
I *20.
I
I
I. *21.
I
I
I *22.
I
I
I 23.
I
I-
I
Mr. Line stated that North Richland Hills owned two lots that
had water wells on them. Mr. Line stated the wells had not
been used for several years and two neighboring cities had
shown interest in obtaining the lots with the wells. Mr.
Line stated that bids were received from the City of South
Lake, $20,000 and the City of Colleyville, $20,002. Mr. Line
stated that even though the bids were virtually identical, the
staff recommended that the bid be awarded to the City of
August 27, 1984
Page 10
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-69, REQUEST OF
CAMBRIDGE COMPANIES
FOR REPLAT OF LOTS
1R-3R, BLOCK 2, AND
LOT 4, BLOCK 13, SNOW
HEIGHTS NORTH
ADDITION (LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF
NORTHEAST LOOP 820,
BOUNDED ON THE WEST
BY GULF OIL)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-72, REQUEST OF
DR. PHILIP D. ABBOTT
FOR REPLAT OF LOT 6R,
BLOCK 2, JACK M.
ESTES SUBDIVISION
(LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF RUFE SNOW
DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY
250 FEET NORTH OF
GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY)
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE ESTABLISH-
ING SPEED LIMIT ON
HIGHWAY 26 (GRAPEVINE
HIGHWAY) (POSTPONED
AT THE AUGUST 13,
1984, MEETING)
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #5,
TO PANHANDLE
CONSTRUCTION IN THE
AMOUNT OF $30,781.02
- DENTON HIGHWAY
WATER SYSTEM
EXTENSIONS
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF SALE
OF CITY OWNED
PROPERTY
APPROVED
I. *25.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
City Secretary
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Colleyville because the wells were located in the City of
Colleyville and had water distribution lines that went out
from the wells to serve the surrounding area. South Lake or
North Richland Hills did not have distribution lines. Mr.
Line stated the sale of the wells would be consistent with the
agreement with the other four cities that were members of the
TRA Water Compact that North Richland Hills do nothing that
would reduce the water supply capacity in any of the four
cities and in effect would be if the wells were sold to South
Lake.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve the bid of the City of Colleyville.
Motion carried 6-0.
*24.
*26.
27. None
28. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
adjourn the meeting of August 27, 1984
Motion carried 6-0
August 27, 1984
Page II
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION ON
PARTICIPATION IN
TARRANT COUNTY
CONSORTIUM FOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PAYMENT TO TESCO FOR
STREET LIGHTS ON RUFE
SNOW DRIVE
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
DELINQUENT PERSONAL
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT
APPROVED
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor
ATTEST:
I
I
.
~~
I
7
DATE: Sept. ,6, 1984
rBJECt:
PS 84-58 Replat of Lots lA & 1B, Block 2, Walker's Branch Addition.
f'ARTKENt: Planning and Zoning
IACKGROUND: This property is located on Emerald Hills Way and is bounded on the west by
~riSh Meadows Addition.
Engineer's comments have been met including the plans for the retaining wall.
I
The Planning and Zoning Coinmiesion recommended approval of this fèplåt.
I
·Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lit COUNCIL ActION I.IQUIJ.ED: Approval or denial of repJ,at I
.. -
!I J/b ~~
,.'1
L'!~~-tr. ~~~,,.~..'...~.,U
~.
:...~
I
I
-
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
(iF
c
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
AUGUST 23, 1984 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting was called to order by the
Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:35 P.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Secretary
Kember
AI t. Member
P & Z Coord
G 8e Tucker
rjorie Nash
John Schwinger
Carroll Brents
Wanda Calvert
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
Don Boven
Hark Wood
OATH OF OFFICE
The new members took the oath of
office. They were John Schwinger,
previously an alternate, who vas
appointed as a regular member and
Carroll Brents who was appointed as an
alternate member.
N OF THE MINUTES
9, 1984
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This ~tion
was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and tbe
motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Brents
abstaining since he was not present at
the meeting.
1.
PS 84-58
. Request of .J. L. Watson Company for
replat of Lots lA &,lB, Block 2,
Walker'. Branch Addition.
PS 84-58
APPROVED
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PS 84-58. This motion vas
seconded by Ms. Nash and the aotion
carried 4-0.
2.
PS 84-62
Request of Cary Vollin
preliminary ots 3,
BIo app Addition.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-62. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
4-0.
~Ie
I
jJ
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I-
I
(G
.' .
I),):::;
; ~ ~ ~ : : ~ . :
;~::;'
~
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 17, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-959~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WALKE 5 BRANCH ADDITION,
LOTS lA AND 18 BLOCK 2,
REVISED RETAI~ING WALL DESIGN.
PS 84 - 58. GRID MAP 106
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 We have reviewed the reference materials which have been prepared by a
Registered Professional Engineer. and we have no objection to the proposed
retaining wall design.
all if you have any questions.
,~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
August 17. 1984
PS 84 - 58
PAGE
1
!S!SO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021· 817/283-8211 · METR0/287-3367
~~~~~~~;~~~~(';"¡,",~~~~#'
~, .:' r ~"'_ ~\~' ..-.',,'\S'<~~.r_-!.~ -··.·l,~~-(l:,-· ~..,. \ '
I · ~ 8~-~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I _ Yours truly,
I ~~---- ~
t/ .,., -- -- ---, IC
Dennis R. Eby, P.E.
I Project Manager
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
([
.1 L.'WtItson
C
tW
. ~
J.L. Watson Company,lnc.
Investment Bu11ders
7707 Fannin. Suite 200
August 8, 1984
Houston. Texas 77054
713 790-1206 1WX 910-881-1609
Mr. Richard W. Albin
c/o Ms. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: Emerald Park Apartments
N. Richland Hills, Texas
Dear Ms. Calvert:
Please find enclosed the design calculations and detail drawings for the retaining wall
on our Emerald Park Apartments project as requested in your letter dated July 31,
1984. .
DRE:ki
enclosure
,/
I . : · - '
C,', Œ·
>:..' .}(::
.... . "'¡'W .
.,. .
I SHEPARD CRANE a ASSOCIATES, INC'.
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS . ,
e
IWAL KE.R5
I·
I
I
I
I
I'
,I·· .
e
I '
I
I
I
I
I' ..
I
I ~ .: . .
f;r<AHC H- ADD I TI DN
· . AU4-ð, I~b+
~tfP OR á~v~ ~FIL.I-
- r ,,,. . - . . ..~ '.
~.f ~N;-~~
. ... ........ . ~ . .
" . .
l'
~
-.,
-
\L\
. .. ..
~. . & : :
.... ......,.
t·, ;:
;J ' . ,.' 1:
,_:. .. t. .:.:.
,.. ..
.
:. ..
, .
...,..... .
. . 1;.:. . .
.. ..............-. ..,..
." ".:' ;.....: '"
.
.. 4{j!/~~ .
t1 . .
-
~
,.' J.
~ ~
.~(¿ 1&- AG.·
~ :.
.~' ~ .! .. :>
.. ~" ¡~ ,;.. ~.. :.r
~i" :..~. " .
. t .. ,. ,
. : . ¡.. .
.' .
: . ! ~
.:.,. T +;~~'r
~ f ' : ~.. '.;' :.;"
.\! !
I'/+.U)EP ~4æ
e.lol-o Do G.
'. - ..': ¡. : '. .
1....~ &ÞHT.
.;1." .ok
ALL- GOt-ICJt.t:.rE --rb Te~1 5""' f'lSJ
a., 2.& PA-rs
r, .. .~
. l
... . ~
. . . ...... ". ,"" ~. '" '. . . .,'", ", ~ ..;' .,....~.'" ..' .. . -~'··I~. ~~~~~, ,,' -~A'o;;~:"~3":J',-.~,i~D1 . ~ - .
I fjG:::;'
.. (:i.. '';i
~ : ',' · SHEPARD calm: a ASSOCIATES,ÍNC.
I . CONSULTING ENGINEERS . . 0 .
. '0
..... ,
'^"'£.~ ~" A1>p,TÌl»J-J) e'5Þlt1Þ,N COt.../sc::t7~. I
" '1<~'I,JIJG- WALc-.: .~.:'..,., ·
H¡'''JIUIif'f' SIl~tj,fØJE - ~þ. BY ~/TÝ ~ /il1C&fttJø ·AILU. '
SM/p ~ ~r--41kJ'¡; 1/ " ,
:; ", ~ ".. to
-- ?:'~Sf21( ~~LU~¡;" :-;-.-:' ....:._~.~. *.,~~. ~\.
?H~I~C74/3)~3.1~! ! : ; , · ":' . * .~."~
o IlADL .
. .! 0 " : ' , ! ....:I
... .. WI\L.L - . II" -rI,,~1 : . · : ' . W
.. · · ~ ".$4 ~ y~ . · - . t.~ ~
E= .D~'. , ,
:K.. ~ ISO -c::::¡Þ ¿tIII':, ~ 3D. ; .
,4s~ .21¡,~"'JfI:: ~ : : ,
WA-Ll. w+. ~ ,'7(S.sJl.~":.srkj. . '
13A~ f;
S'LI.'·x 10" ~ "'" ~ ,.'~h
?'lilt. .... 1, ï"H -~ s, ¡::, : I~S Q/t:...
ž- H·Î~-~,I')¡f"'t-.ç~ - 1.;z."7'
£'L ~~)-1,2" ::- 1,41'
!"#.2(../,e¡'Þ) 13~~~ /.%77) , ." ~ /:sf ~.rt:
WI4Ll flOft.I!ÞVML- a,.es.
T~twaI"l'"& f ~e:E12.
/=.00'& ~v.qrc..k
. A C' · Z :. 112.':"~ ...", 8 I~."
· :7Sì. ~¿:M.1SI1"; 0 r~
~ :::'. ¡ · " .".: . 0;. ..' , I':: 0'" ,.' ¡. -j '. '~:' : .~ ~ .': ..;' ." ; r ~ ~ r ~
· . " ...:.. . : ~ f ~ . -, '. r .. .
." ; .". . . . 0 ¡ , " o. . I .
-" .... ,&; ~ ': . :"; :
. . t
.' .
... .. .
.." '. . A~\.2 s4
(1 &,' .. :'"
'i -* .
I
/
?~
L....._
. t '
. . ,
. .:.
..... .
.-
~4f~H"
".."..
.... .
'.. ... I .. . .
,
. .. . ..
. . .,., .. ..
. .
. .
.. '. : -., ..
! : .
\ ~ :~9: ~;'
...~. ¡:.:?:'L '..: °o~
... ....- . '. . .
· t ·
. . ~ ' .
. .
, '. I .
. I
. , . .
. . ,
. ... ..
. .
.. HJ' . . I": ..:...', ~ .
~ . ..J . . . _, . . .' . ! , . .
....~.,
. . : .. ~
.' ..; j. '.
.. . .
. a'
: ;.; ',' .'}'
. ......... ..
, .'
'-~
,c,
,~,
~ -,.
·~~~,h~y.!ti¡öì\.~..ail.!~1I ',.",,-
'~""""3k.~JI<."'.~-~,,,"- 1111 ..___.....
BUIT ~':1'i::~~~·~~.~:i1D~·.~f':r:o;.~~Jl!é'~¿;';'.· ,¡,
1
I ·
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.2
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I-
I
·tJ···,::·,·,.:".·
,;<,.;.; .
.: i ~:: :
~
¡T--:j
,,-_t_~_)
KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 31, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North R1chland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
. .
RE: 3-959J CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WALKERS BRANCH ADDITION ,
LOTS IA AND lB. BLOCK 2.
RETA IN ING WALL PLANS.
PS 84 - 58. GRID ",P 106
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1
The retaining wall plans should be signed and sealed by a registered
professional engineer or architect.
Based on design standards presented in the CRSI Handbook, dated 1978 or
later. for cantilever type retaining walls with highw~ surcharge. we would
recommend that the wall thickness be increased from 8 to 10 inches. Also the
base should be increased from 3 feet to 41-1., (the outside footing dimension
should be 1'-5" and the inside dimension should be 1'10· -- under the parking
lot). The horizontal retaining wall bars should be '4 at 10· o.c.,~·:and the
top footing bars should be #3 at 1Su. These minimum dimensions should be used
unless the engineer (or architect) can ptesent calculations justifying reduced
dimensions and reinforcing steel. Concrete strength is assumed to be 3000
psi.
Please call if you have any questions.
~ N~ß:~ ~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler. Engineering Technician
July 31, 1984
PS 84 - 58 '
PAGE
1
!5!50 FIRST STATE 8ANK.LÐG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 · 817/283-8211 · METRO/287-3387
".
^ '
.. ~ ~ -¡.~ JI,... ;o,..,¡¡,'" :,\",~~..-t~ ,~.
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
.-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
(i;.;,:-:-:..
.. :"". '
;:;:~:;n ~~ .
'!Z
~G:'
KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 6, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-9591 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WALKERS BRANCH ADDITION.
LOTS lA AND 18 BLOCK 2
REVISED CONSTRÔCTION pLANS.
PS 84 - 58. GRID MAP 106
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 The revised plat has not been submitted to our office for review. only the
revised construction plans. Please see our comments regarding suggested plat
changes in our review letter dated June 14. 1984. However, the Planning and
Zoning Secretary has indicated that all suggested plat revisions have been
accomplished. We would request that a copy of the revised plat be transmitted
to our office for our files.
2 Details of the proposed retaining wall located on the west line of Lot I-A
have not been included in the plans as requested in our June 14 letter.
Please call if you have any questions.
ß¡~. ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN. P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line. City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad. Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
July 6. 1984
PS84 - 58
PAGE
1
I'
~- ¡OIo
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 · 817/283-8211. METRO/287-3387
I
I
',::::,:oe
li)'··'·-:
:::;:;:;;::'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
e:·:·:-
,0,",'#:'
. *::; ~F: ~.: ,
.'¡.. .............
¡:H:;':- ~I
'''y d1Y
J.L. Watson Company, Inc.
Investme:'1t BuDders
, 7701 Fannin, Suite 200
Houston, Texas 71054
713790-1206 1WX 910-881-1609
June 26, 1984
.'
Mr. Richard Albin, P .E.
Plaming and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.W. Loop, Suite 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: PS 84-58
Walkers Branch Addition
Replat, Block 2
Dear Mr. Albin:
Please find enclosed Sheet A-2 of our revised construction plans of our Emerald Park
Apartment project. This sheet includes the detail of the retaining wall proposed for
portions of the western line of Lot I-A as requested in your review of our replat.
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at (713) 790-1206.
Very truly yours, , ./)
D~ !¿ ¿ c¿.Oß" .,/,
. Demis R. Eby, P.E. ---- /
Project Manager
.,.....
4P'
MDF:ki
enclosure
cc: Joe Watson
Ear I Jespersen
Mike Nadolski
Archie Dishman
~, '#J'r"
'.//
.I'
I"
I
I>:;·:·~:·:"
. ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
«'
. ...Ghnen Engineering, 1rC':
Jun. 20. 1984
Planning and Zoning Co..i..ion
Ci~y of North Richland Hill.
7301 N.E. Loop 820
Rorth Richland Hill.. Texa. 76118
Re: PS 84-58, Walker'. Branch Addition Replat, Block 2
Gentl...n:
We ere in receipt of Richard Albin'. Letter o£ June 14. W.
take no exception. to hi. co..ent. and all reque.ted chang..
have be.n aade wi~h the exception of it.. ei9h~. The retaining
well i. being de.igned and detailed by the developer'.
.rchi~.ct. D..ign Collective, who will forward the required
detail to you .. aoon a. it i. r.ady.
Sincerely.
HAMNON ENGINEERING. INC.
.........
- --~
"ark B.
~
.. :..~:.. 4"
1245 Southridge Court Suite 204 Hurst. Texas 76053 817 282-8186 (Metro) 817 268-6600
. J t'"
,
.,..::~:
. . ~. . '.' ., . .
; ~~~J"
~'"
~¡
. .
,iI,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I The Owner and Engineer's names and addresses should be affixed to the plat
original.
I 2 The existing zoning (R-7-MF) should be noted on the plat.
'3 Mini.. finished floor elevations at least 18-inches above the lOO-year flood
plafn should be noted on the plat. .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
íê
I June 14, 1984
..0 PIRST .TATE .ANK .'LDO. - .IED'ORD. TEXAS 78021 - .17/28.-8211- METRo/2e7.ase7
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
dune 14. 1984 '
'11nnfn9 and lonin, Commfssfon
Cf~ of North Rfch 'and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
lorth Rfch1.nd Hflls, Texas 76118
1£:
3-959, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WALKE S BRANCH ADDITION~
LOTS lA AND IB BLOCK 2,
REPLAY AND CON!TRUCTION PLANS,
Þs 84 - 58. &RID MP lOti
We have reviewed the referenced ..terials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
~~.. ...
4
The acreage of each lot should be noted on the plat along with the proposed
densi~ -- (should not exceed19.8units per acre for R-7~ zoning).
Proper1\Y corner IIOnLnentation should be noted on the plat. ~
En,ineer's or Architect's Seal and Certification should be affixed to.the
or ginal of a11 engineering drawings associated with this proposed
develo,.ent. "
In ICcordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirelents the Developer's
Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan:
7 .1 I , , I professi OM 1 engi neer regi stered in the
State of Texas, have prepared this drainage stuctY in cœtpl iance
wi th the latest pub 1 i shed requi relents and cri teri a of the Ci ~ of
North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographic
information used in this stuctY is in cOIIp1fance with safd
requirements and is otherwise suitable for developfng this wortab1e
overall Plan of Drainage which can be f.,le.ented through proper
subsequent detailed construction p1annfng. . '.
5
Ii
7
PS 84 - 58
PAGE
1
~
.1
if ¡,:
I·
1
I
1
I
I
1
I,
1
I
I
1
1
1
I
I-
I
,
{
c
Subdivision Review Letter continued
WALKERS BRANCH ADDITION
SIGNATURE
,P.E. SEAL
8 Details of the proposed (or existing) retaining wall located on the west line
of Lot I-A noting material and dimensions should be included in the
construction plans for review.
9 A note should be affixed to the plat stating that the sanitary sewer system
lõcated within the platted area is a private system. This includes the the
proposed line off-site from phase I (lot I-A) which ties into the existing
21-fnch line passing through lot I-B.
ff you have any questions..
.~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Ci~ Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
June 14, 1984
PS 84 - 58
PAGE
2
I
I
:?
DATE:
September 6, 1984
e
SUBJECT:
I
PS 84-70 Final Plat of Blocks 27 thru 32, Fox Hollow Addition
IEPARTKENT:
~ACKGR.OUND:
Planning and Zoning
This property is located on the north side of the railroad, approximately
300 feet west of Smithfield Road and bounded on the west and north b Fox Hollow Addition.
There is a problem with the drainage. Mr. Collin's engineer, Mr. Stembridge, is working
I to correct the problem and Richard Albin's response to Mr. Stembridge's letter dated 9-5-84
will be presented at the council meeting Monday night.
I
Le
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final plat.
III4IÞCOUNCIL ACTION R.£QUIR.ED:
Approval or denial of final plat.
.~
I
J2/~ (?~
. , "' '" ...... r9'\ .. '" rw .
YJ'C
.0
x
1
I ~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(~
(;"
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
September 5, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: Blocks 27 thru 31, FOX HOLLOW
ADDITION, Drainage Study and Plans,
PS 84-70
In response to Know1ton-Eng1ish-Flowers letter dated September
3, 1984, we offer the following comments:
1. We will provide copies of the "Floodplain Hydraulics Study"
for both FEMA and TDWR for their review and map updates.
2. In regard to the existing 10' x 5' box culvert and proposed
10' x 8' box culvert located in Holiday Lane, the existing
10' x 5' box culvert will be upsized to a la' x 8' and a
parallel 10' x 8' box culvert installed. This construction
is part of the update of another section of Fox Hollow Addition
currently being replatted.by another engineering firm. The
construction of the box culverts will be completed prior to
completion of our portion of Fox Hollow Addition. We would
note that our client currently owns that section being replatted~
3. The superelevation of 0.21 of ·:a foot will be indicated on the
plans and the embankment construction will be accomplished
during the construction of the proposed rip-rap on the down-
stream of the railroad. .
4. This item was simply for clarificatiop that our client fully
intended to construct the concrete rip-rap downstream from .the
railroad. We also have made application for a permit with the
railroad for the drainage improvements and they have acknow-
ledged receipt of the application
If there should be any further questions regarding these plans,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
~Q~J
e ert R. Stem r1~E.
DRS/et
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363
I ~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~
r
FOX HOLLOW ADDITION
Blks. 27 thru 31
Page 2
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
· tI
'1
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~
e
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
September 3, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North R1chland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-8321 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
FOX HuLLOW ADDITION,
BLOCKS 27 THRU 31,
DRAINAGE STUDY AND PLANS,
PS 84 - 70, GRID MAP 87
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following
cOl1l11ents:
1
We have reviewed the uF1oodp1ain Hydraulics StudyU report prepared by Anderson
Engineers, Inc., P.O. Box 814846, Dallas, Texas 75381 dated 1984, along with the
construction plans prepared by Stembridge and Associates, Inc., 4028 Daley Ave.,
Suite 103, North Richland Hills, Texas 76118, for the referenced subdivision. The
drainage study presents computer models showing the effect of proposed concrete
channel and box culvert improvements on the limits of the 100-year flood plain in
the project vicinity. The report is very comprehensive and we would recommend
that copies of this report be furnished to FEMA and TDWR for their use in future
flood plain map updates. Copies of the construction plans should also be
included.
2
The current Subdivision Ordinance states that the developer is only responsible
for channel improvements lOO-feet downstream from his development. However, we
would note that even with the proposed concrete channel improvements within the
limits of this subdivision a portion of the subdivision will remain in the
IOO-year flood plain without improvements to the downstream culvert located at
Holiday Lane approximately 230 feet downstream. The report indicates that the
existing 10'x5' (60-foot long) culvert should be enlarged to a lO'x81 section and
an addition 10'x8' box should be constructed parallel to the existing stuctur~.
(The enlargement of the existing box should be noted on the plans on sheet no. 7.)
We would not recommend approval of this development without downstream off-site
culvert improvements in addition to the on-site channel improvements. Additional
riprap construction downstream from the box culvert a distance of about 30-feet is
also required to return discharge velocities to a range acceptable for a grassed
lined channel section.
3
As the report indicates, concrete channel superelevation of at least 0.20 feet is
required in the curve at R.M. Station 51+81, and should be so noted on the
plans. Also downstream off-site embankment construction near the St. Louis
Southwestern Railroad south right-of-way line will be required (approx. 1.7 feet
extra) to contain the 100-year flood within the channel.
September 3, 1984 PS 84 - 70 PAGE
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367
1
I · ~
I
Ie 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
Sûbdivision Review Letter continued
(
FOX HOLLOW ADDITION
Additional downstream off-site improvements within the railroad right-of-way
include construction to provide a smooth flow line from the paved trapezoidal
sections upstream and downstream with only shaping and slurry concrete or riprap
paving. No structural improvements to the existing railroad trestle is indicated
in the report. However, any construction within the railroad right-of-way should
be approved by the Railway Company.
Please call if you have any questions.
Ouw~
. ,.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
September 3, 1984
PS 84 - 70
PAGE
2
I
J
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
,_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
'I_
I
Page 3
p & Z Minutes
August 23, 1984
c
5.
PS 84-70
PS 84-70
APPROVED
6.
PS 84-71
r
Request of Collins & Colgan for final
plat of Blocks 27 thru 32. Fox Hollow
Addition.
MS. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-70. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
4-0.
Request of Burk Collins Investments.
Inc. for replat of Lots 4R thru 6R,
Block 10, and Lots 8R & 9R, Block
Fox Hollow Addition.
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Tucker said sin
replat in duplex zonin , there must
a Public Hearing. opened the
Public Hearing a called for those
wishing to spe in favor of this
request to ase come forward.
Jackie uitt with Stembridge &
ABso ates came forward to represent
Mr Collins. He said this replat was
eeded to realign the street, Holiday
Lane, for a better traffic pattern.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approvè PS 84-71. This motion was
seconded by MS. Nash and the motion
carried 4-0.
The meeting adjourned at 7:50 P. K.
CHAIRMAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie 2.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
,-
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
August 17, 1984
planning and Zoning Commission
city of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. LooP 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re:
FOX HOLLOW ADDITION, Blocks
27 thru 32, Revised FINAL
PLANS, PS-84-70.
In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated July 31,
1984, we offer the following comments:
1.
A block 31 does exist on this plat and it consists of
four lots on the west side of Sable Drive.
3 .
The building lot lines have been labeled.
A note has been included on this plat that refers. to
the proposed replat of these lots.
All sewer cleanouts have been changed to manholeson the
Sewer Layout sheet.
Items 1, 4, and 8 from previous review letter: Item 1:
A complete Flood Study ha's been prepared by Carl Anderson
Engineering and has been submitted to the City's Engineer
for his review; Item 4: Plans for drainage improvements
affecting the Railroad have been sent to them for their
review also a construction permit has been applied for;
Item 8: See Item No. 6 below.
4.
5 ·
6 .
The calculations for all downstream "drainage improvements
are included with the Flood Study prepared by Carl Anderson
and Associates, Engineers.
7 .
The requested Engineer's certification has been affixed
to the drainage plan.
The existing zoning has been added to the plat.
8.
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 · (817) 284-1363
,.i'
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
r-
r·--
FOX HOLLOW ADDN.
Blk. 27-32
Page 2
Sincerely,
~Q~~
e ert . S em r1. ge, . E.
DRS/et
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
July 31, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-8321 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
FOX HuLLOW ADDITION,
BLOCKS 27 THROUGH 32 (31),
REVISED FINAL PLANS,
PS 84 - 70, GRID MAP 87
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1
It appears that Block 32 should be changed to Block 31 since a Block 31 is
not shown on the plat, unless Block 31 is used in another installment of Fox
Hollow.
3
The building lot lines along Holiday Lane, April Court, and Connie Court
should be labeled on the plat.
Since lots 8 and 9 of block 29 are included in a replat (PS 84-71), we would
suggest that these lots be excluded from this plat and the boundary of Block
29 adjusted accordingly. Or a note should be included on this plat that
refers to the proposed replat of Lots 4R, 5R, 6R, Block 10, and Lots 8R, 9R,
Block 29, of the Fox Hollow Addition. (See item no. 6 of our March 14·, 1984,
revi ew 1 etter) .
4
All seven (7) of the proposed sanitary sewer cleanouts should be changed to
manholes on the Sewer Layout sheet.
5
We would refer you to our comments regarding drainage requirements in our
review letter dated March 14, 1984, specifically items 1, 4, and 8.
The construction plans ShO~f proposed improvements on the downstream railroad
bridge as well as "future" widening of the existing lO·xS· box culvert
downstream from the railroad bridge. Calculations have not been included on
the plans which indicate that these proposed improvements are sufficient to
provide a IOO-year capacity in this reach of the Calloway Branch tributary.
Recommendations regarding improvements required to provide IOO-year capacity
in this channel will be forthcoming in our drainage master plan report
scheduled for completion in November. Until our study is complete, we cannot
6
\.luly 31, 1984
PAGE
I
PS 84 - 70
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
f
Subdivision Review Letter continued
FOX HOLLOW ADDITION
7
determine if the developer's proposed channel improvements are adequate
without more detailed engineering hydraulic calculations.
In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer's
Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan:
7.1
I, , a professional engineer registered in the
State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance
with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of
North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographic
information used in this study is in compliance with said
requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this workable
overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper
subsequent detailed construction planning.
SIGNATURE
, P.E.
SEAL
8
The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat.
all if you have any questions.
~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
July 31, 1984
PS 84 - 70
PAGE
2
I·
I
e
q
('
(
DATE: Sept. 6, 1984
IBJECT:
Ip ART KEN T :
ItCKGJlOUND:
lailroad.
PS 84-7l Replat of Lots 4R thru 6R, Block lO, and Lots 8R & 9R. Block 29&
Fox Hollow Addition.
Planning and Zoning
This property is bounded by Jennifer Lane and Sable Lane. north of the
he need for this replat was to realign Sable Lane. All comments have been met.
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this re lat.
!-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1fT COUNCIL ACTION IIQUIRED:
Approval or denial of replat.
.~
I
3/~~
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I-
II
I
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
August 23, 1984
5.
PS 84-70
Request of Collins & Colgan for final
plat of Blocks 27 thru 32, Fox Hollow
Addition.
PS 84-70
APPROVED
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-70. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
4-0.
6.
PS 84-71
Request of Burk Collins Investments,
Inc. for replat of Lots 4R thru 6R,
Block 10, and Lots 8R & 9R, Block 29,
Fox Hollow Addition.
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Tucker said eince this is a
replat in duplex zoning, there must be
a Public Hearing. He opened the
Public Hearing and called for those
wishing to speak in favor of this
request to please come forward.
Jackie Fluitt with Stembridge &
Associates came forward to represent
Mr. Collins. He said this replat was
needed to realign Sable Lane.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
PS 84-71
APPROVED
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PS 84-71. This motion was
seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion
carried 4-0.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:50 P. M.
CHAIRMAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
I· ·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
--
I
(.t.
..)
1;.,
\J
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
August 17, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: Lots 4R-6R, Blk. 10 and Lots
8R-9R, Block 29, FOX HOLLOW
AIDDITION;~Rèplät,3PS-84-71.
In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated July 31,
1984, we offer the following comments:
1. The existing zoning has been shown on the Plat.
2. Corner monumentation has been noted.
3. All requested easements have been added to the Plat.
If there should be any further questions regarding this plat,
please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
~~~·~~P.E.
DRS/et
cc : Mr. Rodge N. Line, Ci ty Manager .
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363
1""
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
("
("
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 31, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-8326 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
FOX H LLOW ADDITION,
L.4R-6R,B.I0, L.8R-9R,B.29,
REPLAT,
PS 84 - 71, GRID MAP 87
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1
The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat.
In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should
be noted on the plat.
All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance
with standard City procedures.
3
Please call if you have any questions.
~W--W, ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
July 31, 1984
PAGE
1
PS 84 - 71
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG,. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-8211 . METRO/267-3387
I· ·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
--
I
(.
{>6
~/~··
("
Mr. H. W. Raines
TESCO Region Engr. Mgr.
P.O. Box 970
Fort Worth, TX 76101
RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-71
Fox Hollow Addition, Block 10, Lots 4R thru 6R, &
Block 29, Lots 8R & 9R
Address or Location: South of Chapman Road and north of railroad
between Jennifer Lane and Sable Lane
Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the
proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office.
Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning
Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland
Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than 7/31/84.
Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office.
L
Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor
corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments)
Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made.
(See Comments)
A f .
COMMENTS: _ t·,it· f i ' ¡.. .w.
""1'
\""'-' ¡
¡ I
¡ ,
/' .... ..~ ~
~ (I ~...) j / .. I
, ,t,,,"",,
w
.-
i\-.;
(
TESCO: DATE t2«{ /;" /? tI',("
SIGNATURE#Þ~
SIGNATURE ~ iG- J (l ~
CITY: DATE: July 17, 1984
I'
;1 ()
I
Ie
DATE: Sept. 6, 1984
TJEtT:
PS 84-77ER Engineering review for the recorded final plat of Roval Oaks
Add it ion.
TARTKENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKCROUND: This property is located on the east side of Glenann Addition and intersects
Jhil ton Dr ive.
his property was platted in 1978 but was never developed. Ordinance #773 states if a
iece of property is not developed within 4 years there must be a new
review
one and approved by the City Council.
I
The Engin~er's comments have been met.
I .
-e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I COUNCIL ACTION IlIQUIR.ED: Approval or denial of engineering review.
I ..2J~ (!~
. ."" ,....... P9'\ . ....., .
YI'C
.0
x
I-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Owe~ D. Long and Associatet Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
September 4, 1984
Mrs. Wanda ,Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Royal Oaks Addition
Final Plat & Engineering Review
PS-84-77 ER
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
We have received a copy of the City Engineer's (Mr. Richard W. Alvin, P.E.)
letter dated August 30, 1984 pertaining to the captioned project and
have the following comments:
1. The plans have been revised to show the additional gate
valve at point 3.
2. The existing zoning of R~2 has been added to the plat
and plans.
If you have any additional comments, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
Owen D. Long, P. E.
Consulting Engineer
ODL/ml
cc: Mr. John l. Dreiling
6632 Ki tty Dri ve
Ft. Worth, Texas 76148
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone (817) 281-8121
I'
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie 2
I
I
I
I
I
!I
I
Ie
I
. .
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
August 30, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-911, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ROYAL OAKS,
FIRST FILING,
ENGINEERING REVIEW,
PS 84 - 77ER, GRID MAP 80
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1
A valve should be provided on the north end of the proposed 6-inch water line
in Royal Oaks Drive just south of the plug.
Although this plat has already been approved by Council on February 13, 1978,
we would still request that the existing zoning, R-2 be notéd on the plat or
in the plans.
Please call if you have any questions.
ili~r ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
August 30, 1984
PS 84 - 77ER
PAGE
1
!S!SO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I
I
I
·1_
(
(-
II
I
DATE:
Sept. 6, 1984
IIJECT:
IP AkTKENT:
'BACKGROUND:
I
PZ 84-52 Appeal Hearing on zoning request from C-l to C-2-Specific Use-Sale
of Used Autos on Lot 3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition.
Planning and Zoning
This property is located on the south side of ~~plewood Drive at Grapevine Hwy.
There were l5 property owners contacted, but no one spoke in opposition.
I
"he Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of this zoning request.
.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
lIilÞCOUNCIL ACTION kEQUIRED:
Approval or denial of zoning request.
..
I
~~O:.l~
~."' #IIt.....~
.. ... .... .
YI'C
.0
x
I·
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
·e
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
I
I
'I
I
(
('
23. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
grant the appeal hearing to be heard September 10, 1084.
Motion carried 7-0.
24. Mr. T. J. Hubbard, 5816 Jean Anne Court, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Hubbard stated the building was already built. Mr. Hubbard
stated the building had brick pillars in front and he was
asking the Council to allow siding on the sides and back.
Mayor Echols asked what percentage of brick would the pillars
give.
Mr. Hubbard stated the only brick was the pillars in front.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked what the building was going to be
used for.
Mr. Hubbard stated it would be used for a garage.
Councilman Kenna asked if the building was complete.
Mr. Hubbard stated yes.
Mr. Gene Wilborn, 6820 Meadow Road,
Council.
Mr. Welborne stated the house on the pro erty was 100% brick
and this garage would be to store ant e cars. Mr. Welborne
stated he collected antique cars. did not work on them at
the house. His son owned a paint d body shop and did the
work on the cars. Mr. Welborne ated he did not know that
the brick was required.
Councilman
except for
if he building was completely built
ction.
Mayor Pro Davis
brick.
what the estimated cost would be to add
between $7,500 and $8,000.
Counci oman Moody asked if they were not aware the City had a
ordinance.
. Hubbard stated he obtained the permit with the plans he
tonight.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the plans showed the building to
be brick.
..... ..................'t'.~........ _...___~~ wr~·" ...... WOt'" ,J... -. ........: """II!_ _"' - ..",.......
August 13, 1984
Page 10
CONSIDERATION OF
GRANTING AN APPEAL
HEARING ON PZ 84-52,
DOYNE S. BYRD
GRANTED
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF T. J. I
HUBBARD, 6820
ROAD, FOR A V
FROM THE BRI
ORDINANCE
DENIED
I·
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
1/ /
_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Page 9
P & Z Minutes
July 26, 1984
('
(
-- -_.. --~.- -- ..
Acting Chairman Bowen said since this
is a replat in single family zon~ng':
he would open the Public Hear~8~and
call for those wishing to Ji11'êak in
favor of this request/u/'please come
forward. ~
,/'
There bein~ó one wishing to speak in
favor of/1this request, the Acting
./"
Cha rman called for those wishing to
eak in opposition to this request to
please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Acting Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood stated all the Engineer's
comments have been met.
MS. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-67. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-0.
/
.///,/
/"
./
/"
///
/",/
./-
,/'
//
/"'
-,,..,.
PS 84-67
APPROVED
5 PZ 84-52
Request of Doyne S. Byrd to rezone Lot
3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, from
its present classification of C-l
(Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale
of Used Autos. This property is
located on the south side of Maplewood
Drive at Grapevine Highway.
Acting Chairman Bowen opened the
Public Hearing and called for those
wishing to speak in favor of this
request to please come forward.
Myrtis Byrd, 8320 Dude Court, came
forward. She showed pictures of the
area in question and the area which
surrounds this area. Mrs. Byrd said
they would like to put an iron fence
around the property to make it look
nice. She said she had spoken with
two adjacent property owners who
stated they did not object to this
request.
Mrs. Byrd said they had owned the
property for several years and had
paid taxes on it and now they would
like to receive some income from it.
1'·' ~
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 10 (
P & Z Minutes
July 26, 1984
(
Mrs. Byrd said they will not have any
abandoned vehicles and they will keep
the place clean. She said they feel
this zoning would upgrade and beautify
our city. Mrs. Byrd said since it is
adjacent to Byrd Automotive, they feel
the best use for it would be for a car
lot.
Doyne Byrd, 8320 Dude Court, came
forward. He said he would like to ask
the Commission's consideration of this
request. Mr. Byrd said he did not
feel there could be a better use of
this property and it would not be an
eyesore to the highway.
Acting Chairman Bowen called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
.There being no one wishing to speak,
the Acting Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood said this is the same request
that was denied previously.
Mrs. Byrd said the Planning and Zoning
Commission approved it the other time,
but the City Council denied it.
Mr. Hannon said there are other
problems with this property.
PZ 84-52
DENIED
Mr. Wood made the motion to deny
PZ 84-52. This motion was seconded by
MS. Nash and the motion to deny
carried 4-0.
Acting Chairman Bowen said they have
the right to appeal to the City
Council.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:25 P. M.
Acting Chairman, Don Bowen
Secretary, Marjorie Nash
I-
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
July 12, 1984
('
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
6.
PS 84-59
PS 84-59
APPROVED
7.
PS 84-63
PS 84-63
APPROVED
I
I
I
8.
PZ 84-52
9.
PZ 84-53
I
I
Ie
I
(
Request of Tom Cunningham for Replat
of Lot 13A-R, Block 5, North Richland
Hills Addition.
Mr. Hannon a
portion of the er's
dedication needs to b amended to
state the metes an ounds of this
property.
Mr. Hanna made the motion to approve
PS 84- subject to the owner's
de cation being amended to state the
etes and bounds of the property.
This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash
and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Jeff Marsh for Final Plat
of Block 22, Kingswood Estates.
Mr. Hannon said in regard to the
request for the City to participate in
the oversizing of the water line from
6 inches to 8 inches, it is not the
City's policy is to participate.
Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve
PS 84-63. This motion was second~~9Y
Mr. Wood and the motion carried ~~O.
Request of Doyne S. Byrd to rezone Lot
3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, from
its present classification of C-l
(Commercial) to C-1-Specific Use-Sale
of Used Autos. This property is
located on the south side of Maplewood
Drive,at Grapevine Highway.
Acting Chairman Bowen said this
request had been postponed until July
26, 1984.
Request of M & W Investments
a portion of Tract ers
Abstrac om its present
ssification of AG (Agriculture) to
1-2 (Industrial). This property is
located on the north side of Northeast
Loop 820 at the railroad.
I
t
KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
July 10, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 84-52 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM C-l TO C-I-SU-AUTOS
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 123
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
We would note that this proposed zoning does not comply with the
new ordinance requirement that all C-1 rezoning shall be a minimum
of one (1) acre, (See p. 81). This lot is only about 1/3 of an
acre.
r r::kk:-
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
July 10, 1984
PZ 84 -52
PAGE
1
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-e211. METRO/267-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I~
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 84-52 the following described property shall
be rezoned from C-1 (Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos.
BEING Lot 3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, an addition to the City of
North Richlarid Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-48,
Page 173, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas
This propery is located on the south side of Maplewood Drive at Grapevine
Highway.
DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF JULY, 1984.
&~~ C -4,....~-.
~ ~. ~ ~i~ Plann~g & Zon ~g Commission
¿;7?J ~~1 f).~~ l/ ¡' -: - ~¿'( ~
Secretary, P~ning & Zoning Commission
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE
NO.PZ-84-52 IS HEREBY REZONED
THIS DAY OF
Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
I
#'
~
/3-!
I
1_
fECT:
DATE: Sept. 6, 1984
PZ 84-58 Zoning request from C-2 to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off
premise consumption on Lot lOR, Lonsdale Addition.
rTKENT:
ACKGROUND:
Planning and Zoning
This property is located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and
rwood Road.
is is a new conce t. Mr. Hamm wishes to have a convenience store within his drug store.
ere were 10 owners contacted and there were some who spoke in opposition to the
que~t. They are a ainst the sale of beer. One also was against it because he felt there
be-more trash and more transients in the neighborhood.
_
he Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request.
~
COUNCIL ACTION lIQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request.
e
..
'. , "" "" t- 'P rt'\ , .,..... .
YJ:~
.0
x
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
August 9, 1984
6. PZ 84-57
. ~
7. PZ 84-58
"
,
('
('
f
This case was withdrawn prior to the
meeting.
Request of Phil Vakharia to rezone a
portion of Tract 3A2, William Mann
Survey, Abstract 1010, from its
resent classification of AG
(A ulture) to R-4-SD (Separate
Ownersn Duplex). This property is
located on f north side of Chapman
Road, approxímat 370 feet east of
Rufe Snow Drive.
This case was withdrawn prior
meeting.
Request of Northeast Drug Company/
dba/Town and Country Drug, #2 to
rezone Lot lOR, Lonsdale Addition,
from its present classification of C-2
(Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale
of Beer for off-premise consumption.
This property is located at the
northeast corner of Davis Boulevard
and Harwood Road. e
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Alan Hamm came forward. He said he
operates the Town and Country Drug and
they plan a new concept; they plan to
combine a convenience store with their
drug store. Mr. Hamm said the demand
is mostly for food and drug sales and
they hope to attract more customers by
providing this service. He stated
they may offer gasoline also at a
later date.
Chairman Tucker asked what name the
Specific Use would be in.
Mr. Hamm said it should be in his
name, Alan W. Hamm .
e
I
I
1_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Page 4
p & Z Minutes
August 9, 1984
r
(
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
Don Waldrop, 5309 Tiffin Drive, came
forward. He said he would like to ask
a question of Mr. Hamm. He asked if
he was the owner or the developer of
the property.
Mr. Hamm stated he was both. He said
he was the principal owner of Town and
Country Drug and also the developer of
this property.
Mr. Waldrop said he attended a Zoning
Board of Adjustment meeting where Mr.
Hamm asked for a variance and he
understood Mr. Hamm to say this area
would be for offices.
Mr. Hamm said it is a shopping area
with 8,500 square foot drug store
combined with a convenience store.
Mrs. O'Donnell, 5313 Tiffin Drive,
came forward. She said they do a lot
of shopping at the current Town and
Country drug store. Mrs. O'Donnell
said when they received the letter
about this request, they had to decide
whether they wanted to shop with their
children where they sold beer. She
said she contacted Mr. Hamm about
their feelings, but Mr. Hamm said he
felt there was a need for this type of
service.
_
Mr. Hamm said Town and Country Drugs
are like other merchants, they want to
supply the wishes of their customers.
He said all the grocery stores
located within the wet area of North
Richland Hills sell beer.
Mrs. O'Donnell said she does not
understand why they feel they have to
sell beer in their drug store.
_
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 5
P & Z Minutes
August 9, 1984
("
(
Chairman Tucker stated the wet-dry
election was done by Precinct and
there are probably some zig-zag lines.
He said he had been in California and
Florida and the drug stores there not
only sell beer but also wine.
Chairman Tucker said North Richland
Hills does not allow the sale of wine
for off-premise consumption.
Chris O'Donnell, 5313 Tiffin Drive,
came forward. He said if Mr. Hamm was
so interested in making money, he
should also sell pornography. Mr.
O'Donnell said Mr. Hamm claims to be a
fine upstanding christian man but is
requesting to sell beer. Mr.
O'Donnell said he was in opposition to
the sale of alcoholic beverages. He
said he was a Christian and did not
buy from any place that sold alcoholic
beverages.
Mike Snootag, 7813 Harwood Road, came
forward. He said he was not
necessarily against the request, but
there would be potential problems:
1. Late night operation;
2. Close to a large apartment complex
which has transients;
3. It will cause me to have to
request a variance to put up a fence
in my front yard;
4. The stocking of goods past 11:00
P. M.
e
Mr. Hamm said they would not stock
after 11:00 P. M.
Chairman Tucker closed the Public
Hearing.
Chairman Tucker thanked everyone for
their opinions, but stated the
Commission must abide by the State
law. He said the store will not be
within any restricted area (next to
churches or schools) and other stores
in the area are already selling beer.
e
I
I
1_ ¡
.,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Page 6 (~"
P & Z Minutes
August 9, 1984
PZ 84-58
APPROVED
8. PZ 84-59
9. CO IDERATION OF AMENDING
E OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
("
..
Mr. Bowen said if Mr. Hamm meets the
legal requirements, the Commission
must approve the request.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PZ 84-58. This motion was seconded by
Chairman Tucker and the motion carried
5-0.
Request of F. Wayne Martin to rezone a
portion of Tract lA1A, John Condra
Survey, Abstract 310, from its pres t
classification of AG (Agriculture to
R-3 (Single Family). This pro~ ty is
located on the east side of D glas
Lane, approximately 700 fe south of
Bursey Road.
Chairman Tucker open the Public
Hearing and called or those wishing
to speak in favo of this request to
please come fa ard.
Jackey Fl tt with Stembridge and
Associa s came forward to represent
Mr. tin. He stated Mr. Martin
wis es to zoning this for two single
ily homes.
_
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PZ 84-59. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
Consideration of amending the zoning
map by changing the zoning on Valley
Drive and Continental Trail from R-l
(Residential) back to AG
(Agriculture). This property is
located in the unplatted area known as
Green Valley Country Estates.
_
- r~. -' ,," ',' " , ,., -''-_,Ú. ,.. ·
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
:....·.-.;.vt·,·.· 'Ia.........,.. .~.~.A. ...,;...4tr'.:a, , \r',;,.....t..:.. ..J.'.'j.,1.. ,4";, ~ .if «A- ,"'Ior_,"
(
(r
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 23, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 84-58 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM C-2 TO C-2-SU-BEER
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 114
_
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
tv,
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
_
July 23, 1984
PZ 84 -58
PAGE
1
!5S0 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO/2e7-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
/J.",..;
ORDINANCE NO. {' 5 \
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE 111080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ84-58 the following described property shall be
rezoned from C-2 (Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for
off-premise consumption.
BEING Lot lOR, Lonsdale Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland
Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-163, Page 31, Deed
Records, Tarrant County, Texas
This property is located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and
Harwood Road.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF AUGUST,
1984.
~~c. ~r
<........-::r-- ~ Gf'i~ Plann~g & Zoning Commission
t7?J ~"P-7--t.e ::YJ~ /( ~
Secretary, P ning & Zoning Commission
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE
NO.PZ-84-58 IS HEREBY REZONED
THIS DAY OF
Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
I,
I
-e
~UBJECT:
+
IS-
DATE: Sept. 6, 1984
PZ 84-59
Zoning request from AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family) on
I
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
~ACKGROUND: This property is located on the east side of Douglas Lane, approximately
700 feet south of Bursey Road.
I
a portion of Tract 1AlA, John Condra Survey, Abstract 310.
I There were 6 property owners contacted, but no one spoke in opposition to the request.
They wish to build two single family homes on the property.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IWY COUNCIL ACTION Jl£QUIR.ED:
I
.~ BUDCETED ITOt: YES 110
Approval or denial of zoning request.
.~
JJ~ (}~
x
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 6 (
P & Z Minutes
August 9, 1984
8. PZ 84-59
PZ 84-59
APPROVED
9. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
----------
.---.....--...--------.--
(
Mr. Bowen said 1f
legal re u nts, the Commission
mu prove the request.
Hr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PZ 84-58. This motion was seconded by
Chairman Tucker and the motion carried
5-0.
Request of F. Wayne Martin to rezone a
portion of Tract lAIA, John Condra
Survey, Abstract 310, from its present
classification of AG (Agriculture) to
R-3 (Single Family). This property is
located on the east side of Douglas
Lane, approximately 700 feet south of
Bursey Road.
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Jackey Fluitt with Stembridge and
Associates came forward to represent
Mr. Martin. He stated Mr. Martin
wishes to zoning this for two single
family homes.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PZ 84-59. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
Consideration of amending the
map by changing the z on Valley
Drive and Co tal Trail from R-l
(Res al) back to AG
griculture). This property is
located in the unplatted area known as
Green Valley Country Estates.
_________ -...-0_....... _.. .. _____-...-._________________..
I·
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I"
I
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 23, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 84-59 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM AG TO R-3
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 40, 41
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
.~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
July 23, 1984
PZ 84-59
PAGE
1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
It,
ORDINANCE NO. (/5r
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE 111080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-59 the following described property shall
be rezoned from AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family).
SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and
being a tract of land out of the John Condra Survey, Abstract No. 310, and
also being a portion of a 15-acre tract conveyed to John D. Spicer, James
C. Leeth, and Ray Roberts by deed recorded in Volume 3645, Page 543, Deed
Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes and
bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a steel rod at the Southwest corner of said 15-acre tract,
heretofore mentioned, in the East right-of-way line of Douglas Lane (County
Road No. 3051);
THENCE North along said R.O.W. of Douglas Lane, 194.24 feet to a point for
corner;
THENCE South 89 degrees 55 minutes 40 seconds East, 453.52 feet to a point
for corner;
THENCE South 194.24 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE North 89 degrees 55 minutes 40 seconds West, 453.52 feet to the
point of beginning and containing 2.0224 acres of land.
I-
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
This property is located on the east side of Douglas Lane, approximately
700 feet south of Bursey Road.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF AUGUST,
1984.
ð~ c Æ~;ß
CHAIRMAN PL ING AND ZONING ~ISSION
7l7~~~ GP ~?~
SECRETARY P~~8 AND ZONIN~COMHIS$i~
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-84-59 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS
DAY OF , 1984.
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I'
/r¡
1
e
+....."'.
. "
\J '
\
DATE:
September 6, 1984
~UBJECT :
Consideration of an amendment to the Official Zoning Map.
1£'ARTtŒNT:
BACKGROUND:
Planning and Zoning
This property is located north of Bursey Road, the property which is known
1 as Green Valley Country Estates.
This property was Agriculture until the new zoning map was approved in January, 1984.
I
At that time it was changed to R-l (an error). We have had many complaints about this.
Most of the area is made up of two-acre tracts with livestock.
I
TIlis is to correct a clerical error.
e Planning and Zoning Commission recommended a revision of the Zoning Map to correct
a clerical error on all property north of Bursey Road within the Green Valley Country
I
I
I
I
Estates.
I
I
I
JtÞf COUNCIL ACTION U:QUI~: Approval or denial of amendin~ the zonin~ map.
II -2J~ ¿~
110 X
I'" Page 6
P & Z Minutes
I August 9, 1984
Ie
I PZ 84-58
APPROVED
I
8. PZ 84-59
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I PZ 84-59
APPROVED
I 9. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Bowen said if Mr. Hamm meets the
legal requirements, the Commission
must approve the request.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to ~prove
PZ 84-58. This motion was "conded by
Chairman Tucker and the m ion carried
5-0.
Request of F. Wayne artin to rezone a
portion of Tract lA, John Condra
Survey, Abstrac 310, from its present
classificatio of AG (Agriculture) to
R-3 (Single amily). This property is
located 0 the east side of Douglas
Lane, a roximately 700 feet south of
Burse}!;' oad.
:~~~an Tucker opened the Public
~~~~ and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Jackey Fluitt with Stembridge and
Associates came forward to represent
Mr. Martin. He stated Mr. Martin
wishes to zoning this for two single
family homes.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PZ 84-59. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bow
Consideration of amending the zoning
map by changing the zoning on Valley
Drive and Continental Trail from R-l
(Residential) back to AG
(Agriculture). This property is
located in the unplatted area known as
Green Valley Country Estates.
I~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 7
P & Z Minutes
August 9, 1984
Chairman Tucker stated that in January
of this year the Commission drew up a
new Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map.
He said they placed certain
designations on the map and they made
a few errors, one being the property
north of Bursey Road in Green Valley
Country Estates area. Chairman Tucker
said this area should not be R-l, it
was previously AG and has been used as
AG with animals.
Chairman Tucker said the Commission
is recommending to the City Council an
amendment to the zoning map to correct
the Commission's error.
Mr. Wood asked if the property to the
north of this property would be
included.
Mrs. Calvert said it would not
because they asked and received a
zoning change of R-2 on that property.
Gene Martin, 7300 Continental Trail,
asked to speak. He said the
homeowners appreciate what this
Commission did and also their
correction of the map. Mr. Martin
said there is another piece of
property that is not on Valley Drive
or Continental Trail, but was
purchased as AG land. He said it was
the property previously owned by the
City of North Richland Hills.
Chairman Tucker said it was
Agriculture at the time of the bidding
on the property, but in the mean time
the R-l designation was placed on the
map which was an error on this
Commission's part. He said he felt
this should also be included in the
correction.
I~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
? 4\
Page 8
p & Z Minutes
August 9, 1984
Mr. Hannon made the motion to
recommend to the City Council a
revision of the Zoning Map to correct
a clerical error on all property north
of Bursey Road within the Green Valley
Country Estates. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion
carried 5-0.
Chairman Tucker said he would like fo
the public to know that Mark Hanno
who's term has expired, has be of
great assistance to this Co ssion
and the City. His exper e as a
Civil Engineer has b invaluable to
us in working on Zoning Ordinance
re-WTite and 0 e Comprensive Plan.
He has put many hours, worked long
and har nd deserves to be commended.
We w miss him.
ADJOURNMENT
he meeting adjourned
~
& Zoning Commission
.... .... ... ........ .._.~ .-- .
I'
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
/ìr
ç' ')
ORDINANCE NO.~
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas that the zoning on the City's Official Zoning Map, approved
and adopted January 9, 1984, shall be corrected on all property north of
Bursey Road within the unplatted area known as Green Valley Country Estates
from R-l (Single Family) to the correct designation of AG (Agriculture).
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS
DAY OF
, 1984.
Mayor Dan Echols
ATTEST:
City Secretary Jeanette Moore
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
City Attorney Rex McEntire
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE:
9/10/84
II
SUBJECT:
Variance to Sign Ordinance
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: Mr. Leach and Mr. Loudon request a variance from the Si2n Ordinance.
The billboard is proposed to be located at 7659 Northeast Loop 820 at the corner
of Nancy Lane and the access road (see attached letter). The proposed billboard
is within 500 feet of an existin2 billboard and is within 100 feet of a
residential district. The staff recommends denial of this request.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve/Deny Variance
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES N/A NO
N/A
N/A
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
August 29, 1984
Ci ty Council of
North Richland Hills
Re: Variance to Sign Ordinance
Dear Counci1Irembers,
We, the undersigned, hereby request to be placed on the September 10, 1984
Ci ty Co\mcil agenda for a variance fran the sign ordinance pertaining to
billboards. OUr property is located at 7659 N. E. IDop 820, corner of Nancy
Lane am access road IDop 820. Billboard to be placed on property is single
pole, dowle faced, 14 feet by 48 feet, exterior lighted. PlaœIœnt of
billboard on property is in canpliance with all require.rrents except distance
fran single family property line. Both property owners within affected
distance have been cx>ntacted. letters fran each are attached certifying
they have no Objections to the billboard. Both property Ofmers are behind
our property and face æway from IDop 820. We feel this warrants a variance
fran the sign ordinance.A
We hereby request a permit to place a billboard on our property located at
7659 N. E. Loop 820.
Respectfully submitted,
4/ / /7. .~--'~
Ri.èhard- A. leaéh
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
August 23, 1984
City Council of
North Richland Hills
Dear Councilmembers,
This letter is in regards to the billboard to be placed on the property
at 7659 N. E. Loop 820. I am a homeowner at 4705 Nancy Ln. I have
been contacted by Richard A. Leach and Tracy L. Loudon concerning
this billboard and have no objections to its placement on the property
at 7659 N. E. Loop 820.
(2 g~~¿~I&);y~ ~
A. Jewel G rner
, ! ~ 'B~~ox;e me, personally appeared...if J e li/ f' I ~~ fi ¡j/Ç ~ , this .. J:. <? 1(,
day'df .11 ~ 1f ù ~-I- , 1984.
/!./96¡'. Wk , Notary Public, Tarrant County, Texas.
(~ y
Co.mmission expires I))" -S ~ ¿¡,Ç'
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~ : i ~
~
August 23, 1984
City Council of
North Richland Hills
Dear Council members ,
( ,
This letter is in regards to the billboard to be placed on the property
at 7659 N. E. Loop 820. I am a homeowner at 4704 Susan Lee Ln. I have
been contacted by Richard A. Leach and Tracy L. Loudon concerning
this billboard and have no objections to its~e nt on he property
at 7659 N. E. Loop 820. ~/ j
~
Tim S ms ill
· B~'¡óré.rne, personally appeared 0<Y1 S1241 {/// , this :J <¿fÁ
day of '17 Ú. ~ ~ _ ~, 1984.
/1 /.-l~~¡: £k~ ' Notary Public, Tarrant County, Texas.
~/ I /
cY Co~mission expires / d - ç - 2 S
I ·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
tl
I
I
Ie
I
,1'
--~-~~._--- -
I,
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE:
9/10/84
,2CJ
SUBJECT:
Addition of Tape Drive to System 36
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: To avoid potential loss of data and to insure proper accounting, all
data on the computer are "backed up" on diskettes. This process now takes
approximately one hour each day and all the terminals tied to the computer are
down during this back up period. To avoid customer inconvenience, we do not start
our back up procedure until 5:00 p.m., which results in excessive overtime costs.
When the Library system become fully operational this winter, the time required
for creating back up diskettes will nearly double.
The requirement exists for a tape drive attachment to our computer
system which will require no back up time as all transactions are recorded
simultaneously on the tape. This system involves the integration of a compatible
software and magnetic tape drive (IBM 8809 Cl Tape Drive and 7960 magnetic tape
attachment.) Prices for the needed equipment have been obtained from IBM in the
amount of $17,010 which includes the equipment and engineering support, and from
Mr. David Johnson, of Municipal Software, who has been providing this support for
us the past two years at no additional cost. IBM Corporation has designated Mr.
Johnson as a "valued added remarketer". This allows Municipal Software to obtain
IBM equipment for their customers at a reduced amount. We still maintain that IBM
maintenance contract and guarantees. Mr. Johnson has bid for the needed equipment
for $16,250.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove bid in the amount of $16,250 to
Municipal Software for a tape drive and appropriate this amount from account
number 02-11-01-6700 to account number 02-20-01-6500. Approve attached resolution.
BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 02-20-01-6500
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
'I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
RESOLUTION NOo
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF AN IBM SYSTEM/36
MAGNETIC TAPE UNIT MODEL 8809-lC/7960 TAPE ATTACHMENT: FINDING THAT
AN EMERGENCY AND URGENT PUBLIC NECESSITY EXISTS THAT NECESSITATES
THE PURCHASE OF SUBJECT EQUIPMENT: FINDING THAT THE CITY'S EXISTING
SYSTEM IS COMPATIBLE FROM AN ECONOMIC AND REALISTIC STANDPOINT TO
BE IMPROVED UPON AND MODIFIED BY THIS SUBJECT EQUIPMENT DUE TO ITS
UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS: FINDING THAT THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE
CONTRACT AS BID IS THE LOWEST COMPETITIVE PRICE IN THE MARKET PLACE
FOR THIS TYPE OF EQUIPMENT: FINDING THAT THE SAVINGS TO THE CITY AND
ITS TAXPAYERS ARE SUBSTANTIAL: PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY: AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, in November 1983 the City authorized and did purchase an
IBM System/36 Computer System to upgrade our computer system of 256 Kb of
memory and 256 Mb of mass storage; and
WHEREAS, it was initially anticipated that the above described
upgrading would be sufficient to address the City's need in the foreseeable
future; and
WHEREAS, the City's needs for this type of equipment have increased
dramatically and it is necessary to expand the systems capabilities to meet the
ongoing and ever increasing needs of the City's citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City Staff that works with the computer system daily and
has experienced the problems brought about as a result of the rapid growth has
concluded that the needs of the City created an emergency condition and an
urgent public necessity to immediately purchase equipment to expand the system
and the City Council so agrees and finds; and
WHEREAS, the IBM 8809 Tape Drive is the logical migration path for
the City due to its cost, its capacity, its speed and the fact that the 8809-1C
is directly compatible with the System 36 computer which will eliminate any
conversion and/or modification cost; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the said 8809-lC has unique
characteristics that are not found in other equipment in so far as a conversion
is concerned; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the sales price bid by Municipal
Software for the 8809-lC with all attachments is the lowest and best bid available
in the market place and the City, its citizens and its taxpayers savings are
substantialo
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills:
Section l~ That all of the statements contained in the preamble are
found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein as if copied in their
entirety in the body of this Resolution.
Section 2. That the City Council does hereby find, based on the above
recited facts, that all competitive bidding requirements of State Law have been
duly and reasonably satisfied and that the bid of Municipal Software for a
System/36 capacity system, which system is described in detail in the bid proposal
which proposal is incorporated by reference into the body of this Resolution,
is the lowest and best bid and that the City does hereby award a contract to
Municipal Software for the following amount:
System 8809-Ie
All required Equipment and Engineering
$16,250aOO
I
f..
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,Ie
I
Resolution No.
Page Two
Section 3. Severability. If any section, article, paragraph,
sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereto to
any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of
competent jurisdiction such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of the ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it
would have passed such remaining portions of the ordinance despite such
invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 4. Emergency. The fact that there is an immediate and urgent
need to purchase an 8809-lC/7960 Magnetic Tape Drive and an urgency and an
emergency in the preservation of the public health, safety and welfare requires
that this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passageo
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, this the day of , 1984.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
. .
j '1
DATE:
9/10/84
SUBJECT:
Renovation of House on Bursev Road for Senior Citizens Center
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: At the AU2Ust 27. 1984 Pre-Council Meeting the Council authorized the
Staff 0 roceed with renov tion of the house on Burse Road for a senior c tizens
center. Council action is re uested to transfer 11 100 from Reserve for
01-99-01-5970 rovement Pro ects
( 13-00-00-3820)
:'1
l
.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Authorize Transfer of Funds
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES N/A NO
N/A
N/A
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
A~
DATE: September 10, 1984 ~L~
,.
SUBJECT:
An ordinance creating the position of Alternate Civil Service Commissioner
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: This ordinance is required to appoint an alternate Civil Service
Commissioner.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Adoption of Ordinance
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
N/A
NO
x
I .
I
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO.
t~REAS, there are five members of the Civil Service Commission of
the City; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for three members to be in attendance at
meetings of the said commission in order to constitute a quorum; and
WHEREAS, it is sometimes impossible for three regular members of
the commission to meet at a particular time in order to conduct commission
business.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas that:
1.
created.
An alternate position on the Civil Service Commission is hereby
2.
The person appointed as alternate member shall only sit as a member
of the commission on such occasions when a quorum of three regular members
are out of the city and cannot attend the meeting orin the case of sickness
of other members whereby their attendance is not possible.
3.
The position of alternate member shall be for a one year term
which will expire on April 15th of each calendar year or until his successor
is duly appointed and qualified.
4.
The first alternate member, Jack Frisque, has been appointed by
the Mayor and confirmed by two thirds of the City Council and he shall serve
until April 15, 1985 or until his successor is duly appointed and qualified.
Passed and approved this
day of
, 1984.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
.Aþ
I·
I
e
I SUBJECT:
1"
r~
DATE:
9-4-84
Calloway Acres Street and Drainage Improvements Pay Estimat2 01
I DEPARTMENT: Public Works
I BACKGROUND: This contractor has iust started on this -eroiect; and "P ";:¡f: qJ]it"f' ;:¡
bit of the utility adiustments alread~ mgQ~~ Thi~ Drojeçt ~ovpr~ P;:¡r~hm;:¡n ;:¡nd
II Scru~gs Street between GraDevin~ Hi2hwqy aDd Çl~uvi~~.
I
II
II
Ie
I
I
I
I
!I
I
I
~TY COUNCIL ACTION lEQUI~ED:
I~o Gibbons ~onstruction Co.
Approve/disapprove the payment of $61.921.95
I IWGETD ITEK:
[It:
YES X If 0
General Obligation Bonds
(1 () ~()
I·
~
I"
I
I
I
I
I
°1
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
'1
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 28. 1984
.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills. Texas 76118
RE: 3-330, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CALLOWAY ACRES 1983,
STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.1
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. I, dated
August 28, 1984, made payable to Gibbons Construction Co., in the amount
of $61,921.95, for materials furnished and work performed on the
referenced project as of August 24. 1984.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
. your, representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the'
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $61,921.95, be made to
Gibbons Construction Co. at 441 Haltom Road, Fort Worth, Tx., 76117.
Along with.a.copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you
may have concerning this project.
RWA/l1g
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager .
Mr. Gene Ri ddl e, Di rector of Publ i c Works ItiIS COft fOR
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
Mr. le~ Maness, Director of Finance
GIBBONS CONSTRUCTION
I ~'
I
--
I SUBJECT:
DATE:
9-4-84
Walker's Branch Drainage Improvemen~s Pay Estimate #12
I DEPARTMENT: Public Works
I BACKGROUND: This project is almost complete. The contractor has pretty well cleaned
up the upper end of this project and is working on the earthen channel on the lower
I end at Walker's Branch.
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the payment to M A
lI~ompany in the amount of $47,543.31
Vin~nn ~nnc:::t-T11,...t-;on
II
BUDCETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
x 110
General Obligation Bonds
I, ·
~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
·1
Ie"
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
.
August 30, 1984
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Rfchland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-323, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WALKER I S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 12
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 12, dated
August 30, 1984, made payable to M.A. Vinson Construction Co., Inc., in
the amount of $47,543.31, for materials furnished and work performed on
the referenced project as of August 29, 1984.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the ftemextensions and additions. ',..,
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $47,543.31, be made to
M.A. Vinson Construction Co. at P.O. Box 18520, Fort Worth, Tx~, 76118.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you
~ have concerning this project.
RWA/llg
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager + coPV FOR
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works ŒtUS
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. M.A. Vinson, Contractor
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I
CORRECTED COVER SHEET '--~i
r------. -l·
,¥~ \
,-;/ ¿ ..,)
9-10-94
DATE:
.,-----
fPi£T:
Oversize Water and Sewer Mains for Oak Hills Subdivision
fP ARTMENT:
BACKGROUND:
Utility
This subdivision is located between Amundson Road and the railroad tracks
at Precinct Line Road. The reason for the long delay in awarding the bids is that
the developer has been waiting for the railroad company to issue a permit for the
sewer line across the railroad. I checked these bids and found that Leonard'Hazel
Construction bids were advantageous to the City but the actual low bid overall
was from Birdwell Construction Company. The developer has agreed that the Cit
parti~ipation will be based on unit prices bid by Hazel Construction, but he
requests'that Birdwell Construction be awarded the bid. I recommend that you award
the bid to Birdwell Construction for water improvements to Oak Hill Subdivision in
the amount of $216,925.50, and for the construction of a 10" offsite sewer line in
~e amount of $26,255.00, totaling $243,180.50.
I
The City's share of the water line cost is $124,532.00 (the difference between
an 8" main required for this subdivision and a 12" main and a 24" main as required
I by our Masterplan. The attached tabulation shows the City's cost for the sewer line
to be $3,826.90 (the difference between a lO" line and the 8" line required for
'I
this subdivision.) This calculation was based on the assumption that the Oak Hills
I
Addition would pay for the 8" line and the City would pay for the oversize 10" line.
I
I
I
I
I
CIn COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Ap~rov~/dieappro)lp' rrf' hiil for :\o1<=1rpr ;mprmTPmpnrs <>nr1
offsite sewer lines for Oak Hills Subdivision
from
~ater and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Unspecified Pro'ects Account to finance the Cit 's
share of the cost.
BUDGETED ITÐt: YES NO x
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
Revenue Bonds
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.,.
DATE:
c~2 ;5''--
9/10/84
SUBJECT:
Oversize Water and Sewer Mains for Oak Hills Subdivis~n
/
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND:
Utilit
This subdivision
ecinct Line Road. The reason for the
been waiting for the
the railroad. I
Road and the railroad
in awardin the bids
to issue a permit
these bids and found that
to the City but the actual low
The develo er has agreed that
bid by Hazel Construction, but
be awarded the bid. I recommend that ou
for water 1m rovements to Oak Hill
925.50, and for the construction of a 10"
totalin $243,180.50.
line cost is $124,35~ (the
subdivision and a 12" main and a
attached tabulation shows the City's
ifference between a 10" line and the
c lc~lation was based on ~he
tracks at
is that the
for the sewer
Leonard Hazel
bid
the
he re uests that Birdwell
award the bid to Birdwell
Subdivision in the amount
off site sewer line in the
difference
24" main as required by 0
cost for
8" line required for
Approve/disapprove the bid for water improvements
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO X
Revenue Bonds
I
I
I-
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
fJoÁ~
~CtM 1~
KENNETH C. WHITELEY
Attorney at Law
700 Harwood
Hurst,Texas
August 30, 1984
Mr. Gene Riddle
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Requested City Participation
Oak Hills Addition - City of North Richland
Hills - Oversize Water and Sewer Mains and
Oversize Street
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the requested city participation as
prepared by our engineer, Owen D. Long, for the oversize water and sewer
mains and the oversize street within and adjacent to the Oak Hills
Addition. Our bids were taken back on October 18, 1983 after having
been advertized through the City. Mr. Bronstad attended the bid opening.
We have now received our sewer crossing permits from the St. Louis
Southwestern Railway, our material is on the site and we are ready to
proceed with construction.
As shown on the attached copies of our breakdown for participation, the
oversize water is the difference between a 24" main and an 811 main, for an
amount of $109,956.75 - the difference between a 1211 and an 8" main for
an amount of $14,575.25 - making the total request for the oversize water
$124,532.00.
The oversize sewer is the difference between a 10" main and an 8" main,
for an amount of $3,826.90, bringing the total oversize water and sewer
to $128,358.90.
The oversize street is for improving one half of the total Amundson Road,
the difference between 18.51 and 26.751, for an amount of $20,441.52.
Please review our request and forward to the City Council for their
consideration and approval. If you have any questions, please give me
a call.
We appreciate your assistance.
Sincerely, ~~~
~ð. ,--,~-- (
Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee for
Oak Hills Joint Venture
ODL/ml
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
August 30, 1984
REQUESTED PARTICIPATION --- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ---
PROJECT: OAK HILLS ADDITION (BIDS TAKEN OCTOBER 18, 1983 - USING
LEONARD HAZEL, INC. BID)
OVERSIZE WATER MAINS
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 811 AND 24"
3105 L.F.
1 Each
9.0 Ton
1 Each
1 Each
Main @ $22.25 per L. F. --------------------
Gate Valve @ $7,410.00 ------------------------
Fittings @ $3,355.00 per Ton ------------------
2" Air Release Valves @ $905.50 -------------
6" Blow Off in Inlet @ $2,360.00 -------------
$ 69,086.25
7,410.00
30,195.00
905.50
$ 2,360.00
$109,956.75
Sub Total Oversize ----------------------------
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 8" AND 12"
1800 L.F.
3 Each
2 Each
0.55 Ton
Main @ $6.10 per L.F. -----------------------
M.J. Gate Valve @ $350.00 Ea·,------------------
Flg. X M.J. Gate Valve @ $350.00 Each ---------
Fittings @ $3,355.00 per Ton ------------------
Sub Total Oversize ---------------------------
$ 10,980.00
1,050.00
700.00
$ 1,845.25
$ 14,575.25
TOTAL OVERSIZE WATER -------------------------------------------$124,532.00
1562 L.F.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 81t and 10"
OVERSIZE SEWER MAINS
Main @ $2.45 per L.F. -------------------------
j 3,826.90
$ 3,826.90
Sub Total Oversize -------------------------___
TOTAL OVERSIZE SEWER -------------------------------------------$ 3,826.90
TOTAL OVERSIZE - WATER AND SEWER ------------------------------ $128,358.90
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst. Texas 76063 I Phone (817) 281-8121
I
I · ~
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
-
Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
August 30, 1984
REQUESTED CITY PARTICIPATION --- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ---
PROJECT: OAK HILLS ADDITION (Bids taken October 18, 1983)
FITTINGS BREAKDOWN
DI FFERENCE BETWEEN. 8t. and 24"
Pounds
Pounds
2850-350 = 2500
2165-320 = 1845
1075-160 = 915
4360-640 = 3720
1090-160 = 930
6755-1075 = 5680
2830-430 = 2400
Total ---------- 17990 / 2000
9.0 Tons
2-2411 900 Bends
1-2411 55° Bend
1-24" 450 Bend
2-24" 0
35 Bend
1-24" 12° Bend
1425
1075 1-450
1090 l-ll~o
1075
1090 2-11~
1090 2-22~
1090 1-11~
1351 5-24" X 6" Tee M.J. X Flg.
1415 2-24" X 12' Tee M.J. X Flg.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 8" and 12"
2-12
o
90 Bends
670-350 = 320
395-215 = 180
530-260 = 270
166-106 = 60
590-320 = 270
Total ------------ 1100 / 2000
0.55 Ton
1-12" X 6" Tee M.J. X Flg.
1-12" Tee M.J.
1-1211 X 6" SEB Reducer
2-1211 45° Bends
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 I Hurst, Texas 76053 I Phone (817) 281-8121
1-4~cn
OCðC
.... ... ~ ..
I ~ 111 _
r- n -t'.:
I -._
.....', ~,~
ë: I~
" '"
"':
.. '"
, '
...-- ,
+
..
---
-
~ ~
t~~
" III.
~~è;
~~!'W
'" '-
~~U\
""-,,,"";
~ ~~. :
~.. ~ 'It
Þ- ~ ~\.
o If""
'" ~ IV, r··
~.i"
'" ~ 0
~ f\
~ lÞI.~
~~...
~ ¡.. ~
~~t
D--.~~
~~~
a ~ 0
rv rv
\.Þ.I ru
~~~
r--- ,...
..þ.t)~
~~~
~ -J .
~""~
~- ....... 0
rù ru
tb~'J
~,o ~
~~t\.»
~ ~ '-"
!~~
I,
tI
I _
'-.
.{
:
f
~ ~
~ .J
'-.f
....
.....,J
.~
-
"""
c~ ,.
-¡
'"
~~-·~·~~~.~~'~~~~~~.~~~~r·~~~~~~~'r
IL~ ~ Z
....... tI'I '. ft.... ' - (t) \.u I ;::
- \I) ~ "" - ..... '--' -- rv .... t;: ¡..,. ~ "". ~ ~ ~1. _ ". -Þ IN _ ã' () I~ i" ;::
o I'"' 0.. 11). lilt 0 It\ 00 ~ Q
~t:=~~~~~~~'~"t~'~~~~~~~~~ .
/~
\
\
j
~
,
, J
"
~ -, rJ
.. --.. r-
'( .
\. t V
JI
~. ~~~~~_~~~~N.:~~~O
~ !'- v f""> Î" ,~"VI' ~...." ... ... 1_" ...."~ " ..., '" '" _ ,. __ m
1ft. "" ~ ~ 0 --.., ",,-'r ¡r - _....~. ~ (/)
''I "'^ - [v·....... ~~' . zÞ t ~ 0
.,.. 1'1- ~ t; b ~ a . . Þ- Cb "",,"...... ~ ~ ~ XI ....
~ '" ( I"t> I -..; ~ t ~ ...... ...:s oS ~ 6' t-f::Z
A> ... ~ :::;::, ;.. ,. ~,1íiP ~ .;- ¡Þ 4 '-t ~ ' ~:. "0
~ "" - ". if" ~ ~ "^ þ '-". ~~ '" i/:. ... ~ .... .... !t .. ~ 3: ::0
0- ... ~ . 10 ~'~ IL- I -. .. .)( '. ~ " ... F-I 0
~ ..- () ,,~ ~ ' ~ ~ It: ~ ¡......~ (;' iC' ~ 0 <
! " ~ ~ . -~ ~ ~ ~ rt- : ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~
tor (' "11 ... t'f ~"" . '""' ~ ~ ~ ..., "b T
oS! fb ~ ~ .. ~ "" ~.:'b 0 Z
~ 1'I-'b1Þ- ~ ~~r-r-~t'~;r:-, t)\~~~~ ~~~"T) ëri
' .)" ~ ~ ~ =r- () ~ 8' ~ 0: ~ : '" 9 ' 9 "
- ~~: ~ '"" r, ~ ~ ~,~ '"" f,þ ........ ~ ___
~ t ~ f oc r ~ ~ ~ .. ~~tø_ ~~ ~: '- ~ ~" ,."
- ~.. 9 ~ :~_'1t~ ~ , ~
~... .... ) ~ :- :. ~ ::. '!t. ...... p _ ~ ....
...... ~ ~ - " t.. ~ ,.
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
F Q ~ 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ("\,. ~ rv ~
"':- ~1--~ l'
t ~ ~
th
ff~!:::
f' l' !' C"'
~ ~ ~. ~'
--of
,.
~
~.
~
~
~
1\
'" .......
fV~-()
..o~~
"" ~ e '"
~ ~ à 0
, 0 6 C)
::'b
~
fit
.. " '-............,
~ ~~\f;',(,µ~c-..f'~~,
g~:O~~~t:v~~~~~~
i 1& IR. .~ 2. j~ ¡g ~ t;: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
'.J~~~w......,
~?\.è\-="Qt...t\I~
- ~ åo-. ""f\I o~,
~ C) Õ a ,~ /. ()
-
......
~ ,~ ~
~ ~-,.. ~ - ;:- .... .... ..... - \II> wI':::::", "" - ..... '" "" ICb ~ ""
~,.. ~ 1'10' I"- ..... "'" ~ "'- ~ ,,'-' _... "-
o~~~t~~~~~,~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~O~~~O ~O~O~f_~~O...~~
"' ~ ~ ~ ~;''' C) Di ~ 0 V'1 Cb ..
g ::~~:~~~~g~~~~~~~~g~~o~g~g
'~~ rw~f'V
~~~'~~~~~~~~~~~~'~~~þ~~cz
~ g. C,' (;! ~. ,- '" It: ,,:,, VI" () 0 ""\ () VI V') r.... _
,- J ~. I~ ~ 0 ~ () ~ · . ò ~ ...0 ~ ...... ~
~ i; ,g ,* ~ ¿; ~ 12 Ii ì ~. 2 g ~t g g & ~ 0 0 IH 0 -i ~
~h\ ~ ~ V
~ ~ I'~ ~~~-\~ ru -I
~~~w, ~""~~n~~~ ~~~ ~~ o~
"'" ';;.. ~ ' ~'... .. I). :0 lib .... ~ "'V "" ~ \.. "" ~ > ::::
,~ \., 0 ~;;; "" ~ ~ t; ::: t èt' ~ ~õ ~ 10 ~ '" f-Þ. " \I'¡ ~'!. ~ 0 :.' r
~~~~ogao~~()~~~O'ä~~()Þ~o,~~o~~
() ,=. <) 0 à t\ ~ 0 ð () ;.. Ò () 0 1,1,. J () () 0 <:> () () <:) () () 0 <:>
(> ~ co 0 g (> \) <> 0 Co 0 (> co 0 01 ,g¡ 0 0 c. 0 0 () 0 () 0
: ~~W~~~ ~ ~ ~õ~~~~~, c
~~~~g~~~~~~~~~88~~;g~~~~~~~3
ò~~~12~'~~'2~'~~~~~~~~~lg~oaooao~
~
'0 w
,.... .......
""
~ f'v , ...
'- "V ""'1
0'10
~ \It ?
o 0 ~
o
~ "-
Cb
~ ~ 0.- ..... \I)
~ !::> ~
~ 0 C) c :2
~ () a ()
\
n.,
tþ.-t
tl;;~
\I) () >
~ <) r
o ()
~w_~_~~ ~~~~~~~~'~N~
'" r--- r- r-v r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 C' N ~
o~~~gg~~~~~~~~g~ã~~o:g
O~~OÞoo~ö~~~~~oo?O~() ,
~ ,0 0 '" '" ,ó· ~ '" ~ '0 0 () (') 0 ~
I~O 0 ~ 0 0 0 Q ~ ~ 0 0 Q 0 0 a 0 0 0 e 0 0 0
o ~ 0 ð ~ v - ~ 0 000 0 00'
~ ~ '-c Iw w w ,~, ~ -- n.. ~ 1"\1 ~ ~ " (& " !ù " rv IN
~ lÞ' (} ;:; ~ ~ 0 v., rv -',J \.ÞJ ~ ~ ~ . \I., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --o~ ~
() !) ( () r-' () ..... '" "" ..... ,- ~ ~ .,.. -- ..., r,:.. ''''' ,- "" !.II I-Þ> \0. 041
l&gg~l~bt~t'~I~~t~12Ii¿2~~~~g~oo~~
~
~
'"
-1 ,.
o~
-t
>
r
-.orv ~
N~'~~ .....~ ~~~""~ ~~~ ~N~~
'" ~ 'I b v.. "0 '-C l... ~ ':.. Q) -- "".. , .. ~ - ~ I.J.. '" ('\) ~ ¡..o ;:¡: ~ 'J
~ 0 \) <:> c.. ,~ 0 \" 'f'.. -- -() '" N ,..., ~ ~ f.() f.o 1"-- Z 0 ~ ~ 0 ':" N
~o~aQ~Þ~~~~~o8~ot~o~~~ ~v c~
"; C I ro <:) C> ~ ~ I-f' ~ ~ ~ r.-.. . () ~ ~ 0 '" () 0 0
.1;) oQ o()Ujo( (JC)~\"~o 0 ~o :o~o \:> ø~o
OO~ 0 ~ O~IOð ~ I~
~,~ ~~~~
~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~ CO
~ ~ '~g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Z \"
~~~g~~2;1&~~~~~~~~I~~~g~~~~~~~~
~
......
~f"\J lJ.,
~~ ~^~~~~~ ~~ ~~
-' '- '-.. b- ¡.... ~ "~ i'V ~ ct..!-C> 1" ~" .. , ... 0 ~
- ~ 0 2' ~ ~ '.J ~~ ~ r-- ru ~ UJ () ~ .~ h -i
- ê' ~ "~, () 0 ,~ :) t...· ~') 117- 0.. ð '" () Q) iO Qj ~ "1" -4 () C; > ~
" r, C) Q 0 ;' (') ", r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ? g n ~ 0 '" ("¡ 0 Ç'. r Q..
gocooO\;)oocC'c ()oò~oolO~Q~Oo~~() ,.
C')O()OO()O()("">~I~:OO"OObOoO 00 0
--
c:
z
.......
--f
~
0
-i
: »-
t . r
.. ~.,
\
\
í
¡
~
,
"
! -:-\
Î ....."
\ - ,.
, ,
:" ~."";
i'~
~~
~
~~.
----.-----------
~ -.-------.------..------..
~
,.
.......
I'
.,
--)
! Q ~
~ e
!1 "1
n
....
I z
>
:z
"1
,~~
~:
::~~
-
,~ ......:..
~
~
~
.,...
~
t1:
~
't+- 4
~
el I
I
~ "'.~ ~..
~ ~'
~
~
~
o
:0
(J)
c I
z ~
~ " I
-i ~
a...
~
-t
0
-i I
>-
r o. J
~I
... Z
.
} :t)' I
.0
...~ ,...
!:3! 0 I ,
~z- :t
~~: f)
· :J
'" "
~...~ ,. I
."'z
~ 5E~ ,
... ... .
~ "~fI1 I
::- .0:1 0
r" o· ~ n
::.; ....
c:. :. I
.... ....
....., ."
III (I)
... .
Ii ~ I
n
.
I
I
c I
>
-t
", I
"-
~
I
Cè.
) I
..~
~
. I
..
~ '"' I' 6 ~:- .# ,,~ ~ .. "",' 1'\, .... ~ C).. ~ . .,.. ~ ,~ f\. _ I V ... r ~ ....., I" U\~"",~ "'- " ~
- ~
, ~ "
....... '- ...... ~,
¡o... () ", ..... () r/}",,- ~ ~
~ ,... .0 l,.\ 'v 1 \J ~ __ ~
o 0 0 0 () 0 ~ f"L-.
11
',-
" r) 'f't-.. "- I..... t-- t- "
~~' -< II y' 1 ~;! ~ ..... 'J\ ~ \,
~
t»
t'i).J\. 0 '- '" "- '- "-
~ ,-......",,-, ~ ~ 0 0 c::. 0 O·
o ~)~- :
~ ? 9 ~
~~ b~
n - -
~ þ S ..,
C' ~ ~
'"'-, p
;r~~ ~ :: ~ ~~
~t~ ~
¡;o 0'
~ rt;-' '.
Cb
~
,
r.
I ....
-1 :z: (J)
~ 0 en c
z ...... " aJ
. >- ",
r- n -t ~j --
~ ...... 0
-C .... -i
.. 0 >
Z ,-
." , .
ITI.
, ",
, ..-..
,
l'
M
-.......
-
~
'?
'J
(t)
('.
P
'"
=-'
R
<...
--
~
~
""°h~'~_l"\.
J CI . V ~ ...,... '-J
o..<>--~ ¿~~. I
~, '", .... rv (;J (þ t')...
- ... - --
~ ~ b
-:- ~ ~ "'::. ~
~
t'i \"-'
>- '")-
~ 1\1
O:--~
...'-~
A'-J~
~CbC1)
~;:~
~~
g~
'-.J
<>-- ~~~~?''-C c:
l:') ~ v- Z
() <:> <:> ~Cb C> ~ ~
Oc>ú\'-J('\JNf'J-t
~
'1>
-t("()
00....
-i"<
>
r
'- ~~ '-~
t'~ ~~t\,~ '-
l1)~Q:,~C)~~~~~
.. <:) V1 () Ò .... 0J .
()l,., 0(J 0 0 ~O Q:)fù
()C}O<, 0 0000
(\J rv
'J,-~
"""
Wpru
~~Ú)
.Ú)
~ ~ ...
() 0 C>
o
~~('>.~,,~~.. ~~ C
.,()~() ~ . "..1 Z
b <) () C> () 0 CJ ~ (~ ~ ¡ H
c5 0 c> 0 0 () 0 0 00 -i b:>
~N ~--t~
~, ~ C\I ¡,.... ~ () 0 ~
~ ()... ~ r'-"\ 0 ". ~ V (... -t <p
o v., r\I. ~ <.\ 'V 0 'V) ~ (J » -::::
oo0ç,OÇ>9?O "'r
OÒ C-)Ò c::> C> ~O 00
OOC1C)°CÞ'-IOOC:1
"-' W
~'rv
.... ~
::0
~~~~~~~\;¡~ç,~
O()(:jÚ<>OCOOO~
(> (::t (J 0 C> C> <::) 0 O(J--t
~r\JO
~~\,.J
~ 0
(\, ~ ~
() 0 0
'-.
'- u-.... ~ "'- ~ -i
-.... ~,..) rv 'w rv ~~. 0
~~~8orv<bg~~-t
a~()()9~O -(»
() 0 0 . r
g0C>OO C>O~()V
<:> 00 (>" 0
~ IN
1t\Þ--.........
~~~
~~ ø.
N(\IO
0.-
~~~~~~~~~)~~
OQ Q C:") <:) "'~~~:i-'...~
fi () 0 c.~ (:) ~ ~ '" '\ r\--i
,- "
"'" ~ ;:...:-: Ç; -t ~
~ r... ~ C> ~ (\J () '"^' 0 ~
o ~ r\] \~,' 0 V') ~ -..Q )) " ~
o ~ ? ~~ 0 ~ ~ lJ) ~ ~ > ~
ÒOOlf) O() Ò C)OL)r
O(jOOOOOOOO
~,~
Cbh(\,
~~~
.~~ ~ ~
I,
"
Ii
en
~~~?~t;\;;~~G~
oç.oOQÙ;;~~DI-I~
OU()~C100,,()(;J--f()
Q
~ '-C> '- ~ :--.. ")
hJ ~ ~\. Ct ~ W U, '- \'J 6 ~
o (v,· g () û V <J ~ () --i 'b
~ t'ì ~ ~ 0 ~ ? ? ' " > (
Oò <JÇ) ogggc;gr'L
OOOQO .Þ
, . ,
\
..lit
-4
~ \
--
~
----_.~--
_._._-~----_._--",._---_.-.
I t1 ~
e ~ 0
lit c.
" ",
... t")
....
I z
ÇI >
f :x
",
0
rT1 ~. 0
C/)
(") ..... ?
Ã) ::t ~
~
-v -0
-i ::0 ~
.... 0
0 < .1t> ::J::::
z ", ~--
:x ---
rrJ \..--"
0 Z
-rJ -t
(J)
.....
-f g
rTl
::t
Z ,
~ I
»
0
-t
0 el
:0
en
I
I
I
~I
... z
oÞ
...
CII ?I
"On
::DO
:z:~~ r
c....c 01
:DZ- %
~~: CD
· :J
N tQ
Q) r ,.
,!E~ I
~ ~t..
tr> ...
1 ,,~'" I
~ OtO:J 0
'-- o· t) n
(b ell.. .....
w~~ >
..... -II
;;., IT1
en
... -
O·
.i ~I
...
.
I
I
c
z
......
-t
,
,-;
rrJ
I
'-
)
~
< 6 I
-;
o
--f
>
r
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE:
9/10/84
/ì /'
~y '~,":
SUBJECT:
Street~ Curb and Gutter for Oak Hills Subdivision
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: Bids were taken for the streets in Oak Hills Subdivision alon2 with
water and sewer lines for the subdivision in October~ 1983. However~ the
develoDer has been waitin2 for a Dermit from the railroad comDanv to put a sewer
line under the railroad track~ which delayed awardina these bids.
In accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance~ our
~artici~ation in the cost of streets is $20~441.52~ which covers the extra width
of Amundson Roadl The reason for this DarticiDation is a 2rade differential in
Amundson Road which causes the 18~ foot of roadway for which the developer is
responsible to not meet the existin~ 2rades. Therefore. Amundson Road will have
to be cut down and we will need at least 26 and 3/4 feet for a drivina surface
for two-way traffic. This is not a bud2eted item. however it does follow the
reauirements of the subdivision ordinance~ and this is the first participation we
have had in several years. The funds for this extra width can be taken from
Reserve for Contin2encies.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ADDrove/disaDProve the bid of Austin Road Company
for $396.604.30. and appropriate $20.441.52 from Reserve for Contin2encies to
finance the City's share of the cost.
BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X
ACCOUNT NUMœER: R~g~rv~ for Con~ini~n~i~s
I
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
f)cJ~
~
KENNETH C. WHITELEY
Attorney at Law
700 Harwood
Hurst.Texas
August 30. 1984
Mr. Gene Riddle
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills. Texas 76118
Re: Requested City Participation
Oak Hills Addition - City of North Richland
Hills - Oversize Water and Sewer Mains and
Oversize Street
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the requested city participation as
prepared by our engineer, Owen D. long, for the oversize water and sewer
mains and the oversize street within and. adjacent to the Oak Hills
Addition. Our bids were taken back on October 18, 1983 after having
been advertized through the City. Mr. Bronstad attended the bid opening.
We have now received our sewer crossing permits from the St. Louis
Southwestern Railway, our material is on the site and we are ready to
proceed with construction.
As shown on the attached copies of our breakdown for participation, the
oversize water is the difference between a 24" main and an 811 main. for an
amount of $109.956.75 - the difference between a 1211 and an 8" main for
an amount of $14,575.25 - making the total request for the oversize water
$124.532.00.
The oversize sewer is the difference between a 10" main and an 8" main.
for an amount of $3,826.90, bringing the total' oversize water and sewer
to $128.358.90.
The oversize street is for improving one half of the total Amundson Road,
the difference between 18.51 and 26.751, for an amount of $20.441.52.
Please review our request and forward to the City Council for their
consideration and approval. If you have any questions, please give me
a call.
We appreciate your assistance.
Sincerely, 2I~1~
~ð. ,--,--- (
Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee for
Oak Hills Joint Venture
ml
.1· ,
Ie
I
I
r' ~..,
/ '~. :
... _ ____. _ ... -' ..~ . ~ ..,.. _.. _. . ." _.' __ .......... '''.> ......,... _ _ 4.
~\.;;~!~~:;' "'~' )C,~;:J~â':~,~' . .
:¡~~tt~~. ''.:Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
; " CONSULTING ENGINEERS
, ,.. ~ -
August 30. 1984
. -~"-"-' . ,..__...-...,,-~ ---~ ............ ---..
It" ,:..' it " .
. ., '. . ~'. t'
" \:'; ',:." :~~\ :;\"
'.:~..;~.':~ ".
" ';' ~ . <'~( .
'.~' ~ ~. .,
. ..
,. .....
: '; .
..'.. ',.
. ';' ~ .\ . , ,
"'REQUESTED CITY PARTICIPATION ---. 'CITY ,OF tl)RTH RICHLAND HILLS" tEXAS ---
. PROJECT: OAK HILLS ADDITION --- '~.(8IDS TAKEN OCTOBER 18, 1983
: ,~ING AUSTIN ROAD 810)
I
I
OVERSIZE STREET
IJA"UNDSON ROAD - 2500 L.F. {~ Only~
IDIFFERENCE BETWEEN 18.5' and 25.75'
'e .
116 H.M.A.C. Pavement 2292 S.Y. , $7.13 per S.Y. -----------
6" lime Subgrade 2292 S.V. @ $0.96 per S.Y. -----------
ITYpe ~A" Lime 25.5 Ton , $74.48 per Ton ------------
$ 16,341.96
2,200.32
$ 1.899.24
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Sub Total Oversize -------------------
$ 20.441.52
TOTAL OVERSIZE STREET ------------------------------------$20.441.52
1616 Precinct Une Road - Suite 108 I Hurst. Texas 76063 I Phone (817) 281-8121
~
I
Ie
.., 1'1 tv f., f\. .. " '"
". "'~ ~t\I -. 0
---.-.-- --.- .-. .--- .. ...-
! .,
... J
...
-c e, ,
~ ~
~ -4
'" I
; ~
=-
~
,.
....
:z
."
XI
0
< -
", ..
.... :% ~
"'
~ Z ----
-t ......
.. (I) ~
..
"
...
.... ....
~
~ l -t
fTI
.. . :z
1
I
II~
~
-c
I-
....
Zen
cnc:
-om
fT1
n....
-iQ
.... ....
0>
Z,...
" "
",:
",
I
, '
........
1-
"
-.....
1
w
-=~
ð'
Ú)CbO'
a ...c 0 ,
"'-1'
~~UI
~ 0
~
~
~
~~~ ~
~~U) t:
a~~
Ï\,"~ ~
_.~ ta
0
1
1-
I
I
-
I
I
~ ~
~~~
" o·
\H~~
f'\,~..
Q)' U\
Cb~a
1
I
~~~
o"'N
"-
o~U)
Icb"''''''
"O--v.
~~~
~~()
I
o
E
fI1
... Z
.
e-
e. 0
.. .
.~
i~~ r-
to4C 0
z-z
...~: CD
. ~
N e
=...~ ,.
'IIIZ
.)f'"
...~
.... >
U\'" " (I)
-1 ~ "f", cø
o ~ .O:J 0
-i O· D n
> ~.= ...
r c¡)-
.... ...
...., fI1
III fn
e- ..
o
. ...
Z
o
.
ru '- t'\I ~ ~ "
~"'o ã~~"-,~~,,, ~~Q~"'zC::t>
" ~ 0 ~~~.... a",
\,0. ~ ~ 0 ~: Q ~ ~ _ ~:.~o-- -t.....~
o ~
~~
~ ....~~ .....~~~t::...~-tt
Q) ¡:;... Cb 01 ~ N ..... 0'- 'J ~o ~ ~: ~
~~r;~~9~~t~?~t: r-~
¡.... 0 ~ a C) ~ à () ~ Q. C) 0 a 0
~ 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 ~ a
:--... " ~ 0" e... 'I c:
... ~ \II õ' 1&. C) 0 g . ~ ~ ~" Z
~ .. () ø :- () c.. · 1·-'- c> · ~ .....
.1: ¡ .~ i % ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ .. -: () -I ~
~ ~
~.. ~ r\, ~ ~ .... '" -t ':b
~~ '" ~ ~ '" ~ ~,,~ ;0 a " II) ~ ~ ,..
,~ ..Q ~ " 0 ~ 'oJ () a Cb \Þt !Þ ~ w '; >
.,. ~ '" '" ~ ~ 0 0 0 a ~ 0 0 '-'\ C) r-
4W ~ ~ n 0 Q 0 ? Q 0 V) () -? C) ~
tJ () 0 c 0 a c 0 a ~ ~ Co 0 ~ 0
4C>OOoOOOOOC) 0_
~~"
~~~ "'Q~cr-- c:
~~U\~ o~Bo $) 0 ~:--~!'Iz
~~¡»g~i&~a~~t~~
'-
~ ru ~:::~~~~~
'" -- rv ... ~~··1
11,,- ~~rv~"'~~a.~~
Ú\~r"U~c08°()o-.u,()O~
'" 0 lJo. ,..... 0 0 0 0 ~ ..... () ..
r'\t. -, '-J ~ 0....
~O~~CoO()Oao~og
I~ (") IÕ 0 0 <:) 0 t> 0 0 0
~
~~'" '!\~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ 0 ~ ~ . ~
...c è. ~ ~ ô è () If\ () () ()
() ~ I~ 0 0 i(:) ~ I~ Ir"\ 0 ~
'J '-~~
~ Q-Þ VJ
.... ~fV~ ~ 0
~~;:;;~t~~~~~g
~c.~oo?~~O~Ò
~ ~ tot ~ ? ~ ~ & ~
C
":",-Co Z
'" '" ..... lI\
o U-\ -i 0
;t~} ~
~ -t ~
o "-' t'Þ 0 "
o ,,¡.... -1 f\
0""....>'"
Oar ft-
() 0 ~
-.
. . .
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE:
9/11/84
/' /7
c-" I
Ji'
SUBJECT:
1984-85 Construction Projects
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: On August 27, 1984 the CIP Committee met and discussed various
options available concerning Morgan Meadows East, Chapman Drive and Hewitt Street.
The CIP Committee recommends approval of the following projects (see attached KEF
letters)
Morgan Meadows East
- Construct channel in 37.5 Foot Easement
(Option A2) $654,000
- Construction of ditches along both sides of
Hightower Road to direct runoff water into the
east and west channels and to prevent the
flooding across Hightower and Little Ranch Road
(Option C) 49,830
- Construction of ditches along both sides on
North Forty Road between Meadow Road and the
east channel to direct the water into this
channel and prevent flooding of this road
and area (Option E) 75,020
Total Morgan Meadows
Chapman Drive - Construct 41' street
Total Project Cost
Property Owner Participation
Net Ultimate Cost to City
$ 778,850
$1,300,000
546,389
$ 753,611
(SEE PAGE TWO)
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE:
9/1./84
Hewitt Street and Drainage - Construct underground
storm drains in Hewitt Street and 31 foot standard
residential street (Alternate 2)
Total Pro;ect Cost $ 460,000
Less Utility Adjustments 35,000
Total Hewitt Street * $ 425,000 ·
TOTAL $2,503,850
*Property owner assessments are not known at this time.
The current fund balance in the Unappropriated Street and Drainage
Account is $2,708,440. There will be property owner participation in the Chapman
Drive and Hewitt Street Projects which will reduce the City's cost as indicated
above. However, it will be necessary to appropriate the total estimated costs,
and all future assessment and other property owner participation amounts will be
credited back to the unspecified account.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: It is recommended that the City Council authorize
transfer of $2,503,850 from Unspecified Street and Drainage Projects to the
projects and in the amount as listed above and transfer $35,000 from Unspecified
Utility Projects to the Hewitt Street project. Authorize the City Engineer to
proceed with preparation of assessment documents, final engineering and bid
preparation.
BUDGETED ITEM:
N/A NO
N/A
YES
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
N/A
.1
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I¡
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth· Dallas
July 18. 1984
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills. Texas 76118
RE: 3-317, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MORGAN MEADOWS EAST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS.
PRE-DESIGN COST ESTIMATES OF ALTERNATIVES
In accordance with your request, we have prepared estimates of construction costs
for the various suggested drainage improvements in the Morgan Meadows area as
outlined in the attached letter to Dan Echols from James and Maureen Keating dated
June 21. 1984. Cost estimate tabulations are enclosed for your review.
A. CONSTRUCTION OF A CONCRETE CHANNEL WITHIN THE RECENTLY DEEDED 37-1/2 TO 50
FOOT EASEMENT OR. SECONDLY. WITHIN THE ORIGINAL 25-FOOT EASEMENT:
1. 50-FOOT EASEMENT: The estimated pre-design cost of constructing a
100-year drainage channel within a 50-foot wide easment is about
$695.000. This includes box culvert construction on Chapman, North
Forty, and Hightower. Storm drain extensions in Chapman, North
Forty. Meadow Creek, Meadow Road. or Hightower from the proposed
channel are not included. If storm drain extensions are proposed
along with curb inlet construction, then we would also recommend
street reconstruction including curb and gutter construction along
with the storm drain. However. these improvements would constitute a
significant increase in project cost.
037.5-FOOT EASEMENT: The estimated pre-design cost of constructing
~ channel improvements within a 37.S-foot easement is about $654.000.
An approximately 90-year frequency storm capacity is provided. This
cost estimate also includes culverts. but no storm drain extensions.
3. 25-FOOT EASEMENT: The estimated pre-deisgn cost of constructing
channel improvements with a 25-foot easement is about $486,000. Only
about a 3-year frequency storm capacity is provided by this channel.
Again, this estimate does include box culverts but no storm drain
extensions.
B. REPLACEMENT OF THE SMALL CULVERTS ON LITTLE RANCH ROAD WITH LARGER ONES:
Driveway culvert replacement on Little Ranch from Chapman to
July 18, 1984 MORGAN MEADOWS Page 1
FIRST STATE BANK BLDG' BEDFORD. TEXAS 7&021 · 817/283-&21" METRO/2&7-33&7
.1
I Gene Ri ddl e
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
)
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
Continued
Hightower includes eleven (11) culverts on the west side and eighteen
(18) culverts on the east side, including the culvert under North
Forty Road. All existing culverts are too small and we would
recommend the use of low-profile CGM pipe arches at all driveways
(minimum 36'· X 58" = 48" Dia. equivalent). Our replacement cost
estimates include 5-inch thick concrete driveways over each culvert
along with 5-inch thick, Class "B", unfo~ed concrete riprap end
sections placed at 1:1 slopes to provide errosion protection on
either side of each driveway. We would estimate the cost of
replacing all driveways and driveway culverts on Little Ranch at
$81,070. This cost does not include cleaning and grading the
existing drainage ditches along each side. About a 2 to 3 year
frequency storm capacity would be provided locally by these
improvements. An underground storm drain system with curb inlets
would provide the optimum protection. however.
C. CONSTRUCTION OF DITCHES ALONG BOTH SIDES OF HIGHTOWER ROAD TO DIRECT
RUNOFF WATER INTO THE EAST AND WEST CHANNELS AND TO PREVENT THE FLOODING
ACROSS HIGHTOWER AND LITTLE RANCH ROADS:
We would concur with this recommendation. The ditch along the north
side of Hightower is in very poor condition and should be enlarged
and cleaned out. Due to the limited working area between the
pavement and the right-of-way line, very little significant
additional stormwater carrying capacity can be achieved in the ditch,
but routine maintenance will help. Between Windhaven and Meadow Road
there are eleven (11) driveway culverts which need replacing on the
north side of Hightower, and five (5) culverts on the south side need
replacing, including the culvert under Meadow Creek Road. We would
estimate the cost of replacing these driveway culverts on Hightower
at about $49.830. This cost does not include ditch cleaning or
grading.
D. CONTINUATION OF THE CONCRETE DRAINAGE CHANNEL FROM THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE
NORTH TO HIGHTOWER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE:
We would definitely concur with this suggestion. Construction of
this channel will direct virtually all of the Windcrest Estates and
Foster Village runoff to the west channel where it belongs.
Presently much of the runoff from these developments bypasses the
Morgan Meadows West channel and discharges overland to Little Ranch
Road. Your attention is directed to the attached discharge channel
plans which shows the profile of Hightower Road in this vicinity.
Note that the low point in the road ;s located east of the Morgan
Meadows West drainage channel culvert on Hightower. Overland runoff
north of Hightower is thus directed across this low point east of the
channel and then southeastward to little Ranch Road.
July 18. 1984
MORGAN MEADOWS
Page
2
I"
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
The attached copy of the discharge channel plans prepared by Carter
and Burgess shows the general alignment of the proposed earthen
channel. It appears that easements will be required from about 8 or
9 property owners downstream from the existing concrete channel to
Hightower Road. Based on the section shown in these plans, earthen
channel construction would cost about $15,000. Concrete channel
liner would cost another $165,000 for a total of about $180,000.
E.~CONSTRUCTION Of DITCHES ALONG BOTH SIDES OF NORTH FORTY ROAD BETWEEN
MEADOW ROAD AND THE EAST CHANNEL TO DIRECT THE WATER INTO THIS CHANNEL AND
PREVENT FLOODING OF THIS ROAD AND AREA:
In addition to this suggestion we would also recommend driveway
culvert reconstruction and roadway ditch maintenance along both sides
of Meadow Road as well as North Forty. Nine (9) driveway culverts on
the east side of Meadow Road require improvements, including a
culvert under Hightower on this side. Also, nine (9) driveway
culverts on the west side of Meadow Road require reconstruction,
including the culvert under North Forty Road on this side. We would
estimate the cost of the driveway culvert reconstruction on Meadow
Road at about $49,830. This cost does not include ditch maintenance.
Five (S) driveway culverts on the south side of North Forty Road
between Meadow Road and Little Ranch require improvements. Also,
another three (3) culverts on the north side should be replaced. We
would estimate the cost of driveway culvert improvements on North
Forty Road at about $25,190. Again, ditch widening, cleaning, or
grading is not included in these costs since the Public Works
department can do most of this work.
If the Council elects to construct the 37.S-foot wide channel along with all of
the other recommended improvements outlined above, the total estimated
construction cost of these improvements is about $1,060,000. Please call if you
have any questions concerning these estimates.
.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assist. Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
July 18. 1984
MORGAN MEADOWS
Page
3
I.
I
·e
I
I
II SUBDIVISION/OWNER
I Tract 3A2
Richfield Add.
II Sabine Valley
Fox Hollow
Wayne Stewa rd
I Fox Hollow
Burk Collins
I
JUNE, 1984
CHAPMAN DRIVE STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY RECOUP COST CALCULATIONS
ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY
LENGTH COST/FOOT
1,200' $ 62.83
1.300' 62.83
1,988 62.83
702 62.83
372 62.83
4,726 28.76
1,472 17.83
2,880 12.07
1.360 0.00
16,000
Estimated Project Cost
Fox Hollow
Carl Powell
Ie Camercial Front
· Residential Front
II Residential Side
I Park
TOTALS
! I Precent of Total
Total Estimated Project Cost
II Project Cost Less Property Owner Participation
I
I
I
Ie
I
ESTIMATED
TOTAL COST
$ 75,396
81,679
124,906
44,107
23,373
135,920
26,246
34,762
0
$ 546,389
421
$1,300,000
$ 753,611
·1
.
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
vG~~~ \s
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTINC ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 24, 1984
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-334, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CHAPMAN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPVTS.
AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES
Pursuant to Council action at the regular meeting of July 9, 1984, this ;s
to confirm that the City Council has directed us to proceed with
preparation of Construction Plans and Contract Documents for the
referenced project.
This project includes curb and gutter. paving reconstruction, and drainage
improvements on Chapman Drive between Rufe Snow and Smithfield Road. The
proposed street section consists of a 41-foot back-to-back width with
6-inch concrete curbs and 24-inch gutters, and 8-inch thick asphalt
pavement on 8-inch thick lime stabilized subgrade. Drainage improvements
consist of a new box culvert between Little Ranch Road and Meadow Road
just east of the existing box culvert. if the Morgan Meadows channel is
constructed north of Chapman Road, and also included ;s a new box culvert
west of Hewitt Street to replace the existing undersized culvert at that
location. Underground storm drains and curb inlets are also proposed in
Chapman Drive. Construction o~ these improvements will be within the
existing street right-of-way if possible. The estimated pre-design cost
of these proposed improvements totals $1.300.000 including engineering and
contingencies.
Engineering services required to be performed for this assignment by
Knowlton-English-Flowers. Inc., Consulting Engineers shall be as outlined
in Section II, (B), (C), and (D) of our NAgreement for Engineering
Services" Contract dated June 13, 1977, and shall consist of (1)
preparation of construction plans and specifications. (2) preparation of
easement. right-of-way and permit descriptions, if necessary. (3)
coordination of the obtaining of soil borings and foundation
investigations as required, and (4) preparation of an Assessment Roll in
July 24, 1984 CHAP~AN DRIVE Page 1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 7e021· 817/283-621,· METRO/267-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I¡
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
II.
AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES, continued
accordance with the provisions of Resolution 79-28. Performing the
construction administration along with the furnishing of support services
consisting of field surveys for layout and grade control is not included
unless authorized at a later date by Council.
Compensation to the Engineer shall be in accordance with Section VI, (B)
and CD) of the aforementioned Engineering Agreement.
Please call if you have any questions regarding this assignment.
ß¡~~, ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc. Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assist. Dir. of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
July 24, 1984
CHAPMAN DRIVE
Page
2
:1.
.
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
, ~ .
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINE ERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 21, 1984
Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-210 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
HEWITt STREET PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPVTS.,
PRE-DESIGN COST ESTIMATES
As instructed yesterday. persuant to our meeting with property owners on Hewitt
Street. we have prepared cost estimates for construction of paving and drainage
improvements on Hewitt Street for various alternative designs.
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
Alternate No.1 and No.2 are the same except for the alignment of the off-site
drainage channel as shown on the attached sketches. · The lengths of the off-site
channels are about the same. but the box culvert configuration at Chapman is
I different. Both Alternates. not including the box culvert on Chapman. are estimated
~o cost about $460,000. This includes a 5-year underground storm drain in Hewitt,
~ombined with street capacity for a 25-year total, and off-site concrete channel
capacity of 100-year frequency. This $460,000 estimate also includes an allowance of
about $35.000 for utility adjustments. A temporary earthen off-site channel the same
size with about a 10-year capacity would reduce the total cost some $66,000. The
proposed off-site channel would require at least a 30-foot wide easement.
The Chapman Drive box culvert is not included in this estimate because it is included
in the Chapman Drive cost estimate of $1.3 million. The Alternate No. I culvert would
cost about $44.000. The Alternate No.2 culvert would cost about $62,000 since it
would be constructed on a skew to the road and the length of the culvert is greater.
We would suggest that negotiations be initiated immediately with downstream property
owners to determine which alignment of the off-site channel ;s more feasible. Unless
instructed otherwise, we will proceed with the previously authorized Chapman Road
Design based on the Alternate No.1 culvert.
Please call if you have any questions.
. {ùL-'
RWA/ra
Enclosures
~cc. Honorable Mayor, Dan Echols
I~ Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
_~Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assist. Dir. of Public Works
Mr. lee Maness, Director of Finance
I
550 FIRST STArE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METR0/267-3367
I
.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.,
~
~
,
.~
'i ~~
" t,-^-"'
~ -" II -
It \ 0 ;'
I \ [
,; ,
\¡; \, (J
.~! ~
I 1'\ '-...~ '7
l¡\ 1./ I
~~ ; ¿~
/ \ !
. . \'
j
(
; \ \ ", ".
\ \ '\ \
,,<" 'ì '
f I ",
. . ..,
, )
"'~
" \
',,- '
"
"
I. ,.~~~~E~~-li.OWERS.INC. ENG I NEER I S EST I MA TE
WHER: ç /r'( OF N()2.TJ./ RICJ..II.A,JD /-JII..LS JOB NO.. 3-2/0 DATE: 8-2/-1'4-
~OJECT DESCRIPTION: fjEwlrr S-rø PA\loIG & D2.AINAGE IMPROVEMEAlTS
j!
~ . ..
_ H l- I ~ /tC. A./ A 'c IV 0 # I ~d ~
IIÆE - t>ESJ6N ~t).5r S5Tlh1ATE
-
~
81 .. 8-8 S-rANÞAeD £eS/ÞE1JTIA L.
--. ST~"'6T S.C,-r,O,J. &;1 ~ rll~(;,K. HMAC.
.... CAJ B " - '-IMe .s-rABI ì..I z e-Þ .sl/StJÞÆA Þ6
lVlrl-l ~/¿~Ií!. A4IÞ ~4"(i,II"T"-ø-IZS.
II/AJGI- ClIÞE5 AAI ,4 LL."WðAJCE ¡::()fI!.. ~OIJ~.
II ÞR., VEWA~ REPt.AGSI'nEAJ'TS.
r
DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
ITEM
NO.
I
~Þ£R(;'IlOUf..1() S7'()/ZM O/2.AI,v
.:.wu J./ EW I rr ..
/ g - ß c-¡P
5/1 #c G.~
~~~ )~GP
7~" ~p
/0' G {¿I£ß ~NL.ET.s
D/~~ilA.L2...,¡; ~EAD~~¿:j~ J 1'=RDI"Y'1
72" ~c, 7D' (;DAJC, CN A AJ Jt:L.
~ 71:rTAL DRA/µA6ÞE /1oJ HEWlrï
~ J _ I . I
. .- porG: "16~1 ~DD 1/4<Jo # ~ 13J~ IIU=
II ..
·OFF.,. 5/ r£ ßOµG£ Ere (! J.lAIVNE L
10 ~ - Y E7412.. DE$/(;, J:
.. SerrTD"". / 0 '
SS :I. ,:,
DCPrH ., S"
II To P =- :2~'
II E$Þ?T. ¡z.o.'D a 80" (A1/N')
~
CI
~
5
4-
S
("
7
II
II
x
...
tJ'
A./D'Te l EAILTJlE/J CHt4NAJI=' DP
.:5AAA IF $ /Z.ø r /0 - Y EA~ CA~)
.. ~21-/L.'-.. _2/../Zo.t:JÐ
.
~. n"s~, U'r,¿./ÎÝ Arxrv.s7MêJ./TS
TOTAL
UNIT QUANTITY
¿,F.
It¡". Q ()
,-, F.
L,P.
'-,F.
LøF.
EAGI-!
I., S I
=-" 0
~ 4-0
3 "0
(¿,Df)
ß
I
l,F,
.8,10
q 1.., ¡r. I~ÞO
,
~
tI
J-'
UNIT
PR ICE
COST
u
EO. DO ~ / 12~0f)(),()D
r
2 I> . 00 '11 ~, () . ()D
Ie D , ø" J. ~. Dt} () . DO
II/). D (J ~.. (, ÐØ " () D
, 4-tJ . ø C) ~ .4.' D DO . D 0
/ 71JfJ. f)D I~.. fø øIJ . Ð 0
~ðþtJ.ðD ~ Ð.Ø.OO
, 18~"S'(),ðtJ
~
/O().þ(J'fI rKß DC (;)
..
~
z'S. tJD " ~ 5.. DDI.O
..
SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCT! ON COST - - - ; 4 1!;560.c"
PLUS €1J61IJEE£IN6, &.
(!,þAfr 1,vG, ENCI £.s 4-J. f4.O,
.
~ED & APPROVED~
to, ~ p~
PROJECT MANAGER
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
." 4-6~'