HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1984-09-24 Agendas
.~.''''.''..'.'~'
~..f.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 - 6:00 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
Work Session on Amendment to Ordinance
No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance) - ParkingtlA·~ IJ....~
,
Requirements
/1 It? ~
{J:. '1
Update of Public Works Projects
Discussion of Granting Sewer Service to
First Baptist Church of Haltom City
(Agenda Item 1115) ( Ct~·~.... ç:~ J~-~",,)
Discussion of Bids for Police Uniforms
(Agenda Item #22)
Discussion of Contract for Computer
Software-Police Department (Agenda Item
#16)
Discussion of Repayment of Property
Taxes on Bank Shares (Agenda Item #23)
Discussion of Other Items
/) -
{¿¡~ { -¿'-~.r
I
I
.
I For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
NUMBER
1/
// '
,/
~/.
/ ,
I
j.
/
*$.
/
*9t
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 24, 1984
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
Call to Order
Roll Call
Invocation
Consideration of Minutes of the Re ular
Meeting September 10, 1984
Consideration of Removin
Consent Agenda
Item (s) from the
,'.
Consideration of Consent Agenda Item (s)
indicated by Asterisk (8, 9, 10, 11, 15,
16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, & 23)
/
~.
Presentation of Five Year Service Award to
Duane Hickman of the Fire Department
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-4, Request of
James R. Phillips for Short Form Plat of
Lot 2, Block 32, College Hill Addition
(Located at 6300 Davis Boulevard,
approximately 93 feet west of Ross Road)
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-74, Request of
Ruth Hodges Blessing for Short Form Plat of
Lot 1, Block 1, W. A. Blessing Addition
(Located on the north side of Glenview
Drive (Hobby Horse Corral)
I
I
.
I For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 24, 1984
ITEM
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-75. ReQuest of
Carv Vollintine for Final Plat of Lots 1
I .?'- thru 3, BI~Ck 3. Ta~![~ AdditiO~ (Located on
.... .. ~~_. · \ the west s1de of Rufe Snow Dr1ve.
It. ,?- 300 feet south of Brownin
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
NUMBER
/'
,I
*10.
,/
ACTION TAKEN
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-102, ReQuest of
F. Wayne Martin for Final Plat of Lots 1 &
2, Block 4, Londonderry Addition
(previously submitted as Martin-Withers
Addition Located on the east side of
roximatel 700 feet south
of Bursey Road)
Consideration of Grantin
on PZ 84-72 - Jeou Hock Lin
eal Hearin
Consideration of Grantin
Charles Owen
eal Hearin
Inc.
Consideration of Re uest of Richard Leach
for a Variance to the Si~n Ordinance
(Denied at the September 10, 1984 Council
meetin~)
I f ~
I
.
II For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
* Consideration of A ro riation of Funds for
I Street Seal Coating Program
. /
I 4.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 24, 1984
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
NUMBER __
/'
~¥5. Consideration of Grantin~ Sewer Service to
First Baptist Church of Haltom City~ 5825
Whitley Road
*¡,¿
Consideration of Contract for Computer
Software - Police Department
Consideration of Bids for Camera Equipment
for City Cable
Consideration of Bid for Oversizin~ Water
Mains for Summer Hills Addition - Watauga
~
Consideration of Bid for Oversizin~ Water
Mains for Foster Village, Section 17 -
Watauga
*
Consideration of Partial Pa
#1 to ISl Contractors & Engineers
Incorporated-High Service Pump at Conn
Booster Station
Estimate
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 24, 1984
II ~ the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
I NUMBER
I
I
I
I
I
I.
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II-
I
*
Consideration of Bids for Police Uniforms
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
/
*2~ Consideration of Repavment of Pro~erty
(/
Shares
;'75-
24':
Citizen Presentation
25.
Ad;ournment
I
c- /' </'
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
"""'''J'''~~~''
"It
.';.~
<,;,.:
.Ç?
-} /'?¿' I
ORDINANCE NO. 83
MY ORDINANCE FOR THE REGULATION OF PARKING AND STORING OF
VEHICLES lJPON THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, DEFINING TERMS, PROHIBITING PARKING OR STORING
VEHICLES IN SPECIFIED PLACES: PROVIDING FOR IMPOUNDING OF
VEHICLES: PROVIDING RULES CONCERNING ARRESTS FOR VIOLATION:
PROVIDDlG A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED. t200~OO FOR THE VIOLA.TION
OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS ORDINANCE: CONTAINING A SAVING
CLAUSEs AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDmANCES
MJD DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the existing ordinances regulating parking end storing
vehicles on the public streets and highw~s of the City of North Ridhland
Hills, are inadequate and obsolete in the term and application, are in-
valid because of conflict with existing law of the state; ,and
WHEREAS, the governing body has caused the preparation of and has
carefully considered this code and desires to enact it now, therefore
. -.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. THATt
ARTICLE I.
SECTION 1. Definition of words and phrases. All words emd
phrases used in this Article which m~ require a definition shall be ex-
pressly defined as set out in Article 6701 D, Vernon's Annotated Civil
statutes, Section 1, Sub-division 1, Sub-division 2 and Sub-division 3,
by adopting the definition as set out in Article 6101 Dj this is intended
that the said definition shall be the same as if' contained in the body of
this ordinance.
.. ,...
SECTION 2. Vehicles commonly known as piok-up trucks, 3/4 ton
and under, and panel delivery trucks and station wagons are specifically
excluded from the definition of truok as defined in the preceding section. \
ARTICLE II.
STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKrnG PROHIBITED IN
SPECIFIED PLACES
SECTION 1. Stopping, StAnding, or Parking Prohibited, no. Signs
Required. (a) No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle except when
necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with law
or the directions of a police officer or traffio oontrol device in any of
the following placess
(1) On a sidewalk
(2) In front of a public or private drivew~
(3) Within an intersection
(4) Within 15 teet of a fire hydrant, unless otherwise marked
(5) On a crosswalk
I
I
I'e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
-
(6) A.t an intersection within thirty (30) feet of an existing
intersecting curb line or projeotion of an intersecting
curb line, unless otherwise marked
(7) Between a safety zone and the adjaoent curb or within 30
feet of points on the curb immediately opposite the ends of
a safety zone. unless the Chief of Police has indicated
length by signs or markings.
.
(8) Within 20 feet of the nearest rail or main line railroad
crossing.
(9) Within 20 feet of the driveway entrance to any tire station.
(10) Alongside or opposite any street excavation or obstruction
when stopping, standing or parking would obstruot traffic.
(11) In the roadway side ot any vehiole stopped or parked at the
edge or curb ot a street.
(12) Upon any bridge or other elevated structure upon a highway
or within a street tunnel or underpass.
(13) At any place where official signs or markings prohibit a
stopping.
(14) Beside any curb painted red in color.
(b) No person shall move a vehicle not lawfully under his control
into ~ such prohibited area or aw~ tram a curb when such distance is
unlawful.
SECTION 2. Parking Not to Obstruct Traffio. No person shall
park any vehicle upon a street, other than an alley, in such a manner or
under such conditions as to leave available les8 than 10 feet ot the width
of the roadway for free movement ot vehicular traffic.
SECTION 3. Parking In Alleys. (a) No person shall park a
vehicle within an alley in such a manner or under such conditions as
to leave available less than 10 feet ot the width of the roadway for the
free movement of vehicular traffic, and no person shall stop, stand, or
park a vehicle with an alley in such position as to blook the drivew~
entrance to any abutting property.
(b) No person shall park a vehicle which is not commercial vehi.cle
as defined in Section 5 (as below, within any alley situated in the eentral
business distriot.
SECT ION 4. Parking on Streets Under Repair. In any case
where any street in the City of North Riohland Hills is being torn up_
repaired, or paved, or where any work is being done upon same, making
neoessa~ the regulation of traffic thereon, the Chief of Police is here~
authorized to prevent parking either altogether or to any extent deemed
wise by him for any certain period of time that may be neces8a~. or to
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
close the street to traffic altogether for such period of time, by erecting
thereon official signs with the parking restrictions clearly stated on
such signs.
SECTION 5. Parking of Commercial & Farm Vehicles. (a) It shall
be unlawful for any person, or any owner. to leave, park or stand any truck-
tractor, road-tractor, trailer, semi-trailer, bus or any other oommercial
or farm motor vehicle bearing commerci~l or farm license upon any public
street, alley, parkw~, boulevard or public plaoe, provided this section shall
not apply to street construction. maintenance and repair equipment, trucks,
rollers and implements, and trucks equipment, trailers and vehicles used
by public service utility companies engaged in repairing or extending
public service utilities, and to motor buses when taking on or discharging
passengers at the custom~ bus stops and except all other vehicles
designated herein when actually parked at a designated loading zone, in
those areas of l~ited parking where loading zones are designated.
Provided, further, that this section shall not apply to any vehicle defined
or designated herein developing a mechanical defect after such vehicle
has commenced to run, enroute, making it unsafe to proceed further, and in
this event, it shall be lawful to stand or park the vehicle during the
time made necessary to make emergency repairs.
(1) It shall be unlawful tdr any persons or any owner, to leave,
park or stand any truck-tractor, road-tractor, semi.-trai1er, or any other
connnercial vehicle in any alley situated within the oentra1 business
district tor more than fifteen (15) minutes, other than for the pur~ose
of loading or unloading.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person or any owner to leave,
park or stand ~ truck-tractor, road-tractor, semi-trailer. bus, truck
or trailer with a rated capacity in excess of one (1) ton, according to
the manufacturer's classification, upon property' within any zoned area
zoned as either a dwelling district, or apartment distriot, according to
the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills. This section
shall not prevent the parking or standing of the above described vehicles
in such ~oned areas for the purpose of expeditiously loading and unloading
passengers, freight, or merchandise but not for otherwise.
(1) It shall be unlawful tor any person or any owner to leave,
park, or stand any truck-tractor, road-tractor, semi-trailer, or .'other
commercial vehicle on the driver's side of any one-w~ alley situated
within the central business district.
SECT ION 6. Parking for Certain Purposes Prohi bi ted . No pers on
shall park ~ vehicle upon any street for the principal purpose of
(1) Displ~ing such vehicle for sale.
(2) Washing. greasing. or repairing such vehicle except repairs
necessitated by an emergency.
(3) Disp1~ing for sale or selling any merchandise.
(4) Daily and/or regular storage of such vehiole·.
I
I ~,
.-.
I
I '.
I
I
I
I
I
I'e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--.
I
,,~!~..
.' "
I
ilz:c<
t· >-:.., :,
;.J:
~Z
'<$
~
Io.,¡.j
SECTION 7. Parking Adjacent to Schools. (a) The Chief of
Police is hereby authorized to erect signs indicating no parking upon
tll8.t side of any street adjacent to any school property when such
parking would interfere with traffic or create a hazardous situation.
SECTION 8. Parking in Front of Entrances to Certain Buildings.
No person shall stand or park a vehicle in front of any entrance whioh pro-
vides access to hotels. to theatres or to the upper floors of any buildings
four or more stories in he~ght. Such entrances shall remain open for fire
or other emergency purposes.
SECTION 9. Parking Prohibited on Narrow Streets. (a) The Chief
ot Police is hereby authorized to erect signs indicating no parking upon
any street when the width of the roadw~ does not exoeed 20 feet. or upon
one side of a street as indicated ~ such signs when the width of the
roadway does not exceed 30 feet.
(b) When official signs prohibiting parking are ereoted upon narrow
streets as authorized herein, no person shall park a vehicle upon any
such street in violation of any such sign.
SECTION 10. Standing or Parking on One-Way Roadways. In the
event 8. highway includes two or more separate roadways 8.'ld trdfic is
or park a vehicle upon the left-hand side of eny such one-way roadway.
SECTION 11. No stoe!ing, Standing or Parking Near Hazardous or
Congested Places. (a) The Ch et of Polioe is hereby authorized to
determin and designate, by proper signs, plaoes not exoeeding 100 feet in
length in which the stopping. standing, or parking of vehicles would create
~~ especially hazardous condition or would cause unusual delay to traffic.
and to erect signs giving notice thereof.
(b) When official signs are erected at hazardous or congested places
as authorized herein, no person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle in
any suoh designated place.
SECTION 12. Owner Not to Permit Car Registered in His Name to be
ILLEGALLY PARKED. No person shall allow, permit or suffer any vehiole re-
gistered in his nwme to stand or park in any street in the City of North
Richland Hills in violation of any provision of this Ordinance regulating
the standing or parking of vehicles.
SECTION 13. Owner Responsible for Illegal Stopping. Standing or
Parking: Evidence of Ownership. If' a vehicle is found unattended or un-
occupied upon a street. highw~. alley, or other public place. in violation
of any provision of the ordinance regulating the stopping, standing or park-
ing of vehicles. the same is hereby declared a nuisance per se, and the fact
tha.t such vehicle is unattended or unoccupied by any person shall be prima
facie evidence that the owner unlawfully stopped, placed or parked such
vehicle.
SECTION 14. Officers Authorized to Remove>- Illegally Stopped
Vehicles. (a) Whenever any police officer finds a vehicle standing upon
a street or highway in violation or any of the foregoing provisions of this
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
,_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
...~..,.~
J
article such officer is hereby authorized to move such vehicle. or require
the driver or other person in charge of the vehicle to move the same to a
position off the paved or main travelled part of such highway or street.
"'t
(b) Any police officer is hereby authorized to remove a vehicle from
a highway to the nearest garaße or other place of safety, or to a storage
place designated or maintained by the City, under the circumstances here-
inafter enumerated:
(1) When any vehicle is left unattended upon any bridge, viaduct
or causew~ or in any tube or tunnel where such vehicle
constitutes an obstruction to traffic.
(2) When any vehicle is illegally parked so as to block the
entrance to any private driveway and it is impracticable to
move such vehicle from in front of the driveway to another ¡:art
of the highway.
(3) "When any vehicle is found upon a highway and report has pre-
viously been made that such vehicle has been stolen or compl~ int
has been filed and a warrant thereon issued, charging that
such vehicle has been embezzled.
, ,
(4) When any such officer has reasonable grounds to believe
that any vehicle has been abandoned.
(5) When a vehicle upon a highw~ is so disabled that its
normal operation is impossible or impracticable and the persons
in charge of the vehicle are incapacitated by reaSon of
physical inju~ or other reason to such an extent as to be
unable to provide for its remo~Tal or custody, or are not in
the immediate vicinity of the disabled vehicle.
(6) When an offioer arrests any person driving or in control ot
e vehicle for an alleged offense and such officer is by this
code or other law required to take the person arrested immediately
before a magistrate.
(7) A reasonable fee for removing the automobile and for storage
shall be charged against the vehicle.
(c) Any vehicle ata..'1ding unattended may be moved by any member of the
police or fire department and any policemen or fireman ~y require the
moving of such vehicle if it obstructs the free movements of such persons in
the actual discharge of their duties.
(d) Any member of the police department is hereby authorized to remove
any vehicle parked or standing in or on any portion of the highway when
in the op~ion of the said member of the police department, the said
vehicle constitutes a hazard, or interferes with a normal function of a
~overnmental agency, or by reaSon of e~ catastrophe, emergency or unusual
c-ircumstance the safety of said vehicle is imperiled.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I r....·
~-' .
?
I IK
Ã:
I ~~
I
I.:~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.~.
I .
¡ ~';...,
I j~C~ ¡
,i....
~. ....
.~-
.:;
ARTICLE III.
PEl~ALTY
Any person who violates any of thé provJ.B lons of this chapter shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined not lesa
than one and no/1oo (.100.~ Dollars and no more than 1)Jo-H~dre<:i end noflCD
($200.00) Dollars.
SECT IO!\! 2. Confl;ctin~ Ordinances Repealed. All ordinances or
parts of ordinances. of this City inconsistent or in conflict herewith. are
hereby repealed.
SECTION 3. On lie at ion Thereof to An Person or Circumstance.
If aD¥' portion of this ordinence sha be found or he d to be inva id or
unconstitutional by a Court. such invalidity shall not affect the remaining
portions or applications of this ordinance which can be given effect without
the invalid portions or application. provided such remaining portions are
not determined by the Court to be inoperatable. and to this and the various
parts ot this ordinance are declared to be severable. and the Ci~ Council
declares that it would have enacted such remaining portions without the
invalid portions.
SECTION 4. If there be a conflict between any of t he provisions
of this ordinance and the Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways. as
enacted qy :he 50th Legislature of Texas in 1947, of the orders, rules,
regulations and requirements of the Interstate Commerce Commission or
the Railroad Commission of Texas, relating to the equipping and other
safety requirements of vehiclesþ motor vehicles, truck-tractors. trucks.
buses, trailers, semi-trailers or pole trailers. compliance by the ovmers
or operators of such vehicles with such statute orders, rules and regulations
of the Interstate ßommerce Commission and the Railroad Commission of Texas,
shall be deemed a compliance with this ordinance; excèpt that any require-
ment of this ordinance in addition to. but not in oonflict with. said
statute or the requirements of the Interstate Commerce Commission or the
Railroad Commission shall be complied with.
SECTION 5. In a~ prosecution for my violation of this
ordinance, it shall not be necessA~ for the prosecution to prove the
installation or authority therefore. of ~ traffic control device or
signal, but any person charged with a violation of this ordinance shall
have the right to prove the s sme was not 80 installed or authorized as a
defense.
SECTION 6. The fact that there does not now exist a parking
ordinance in and for the City of North Richland Hills end that the existing
traffic ordinances are in some cases obsolete and in other oases oontra~ t6
the provisions of state law. creates an emergency in the preservation of
public peace, health. safety and general welfare and requires that this
ordinance take effect immediately from and after its passage.
APPROVED AND PASSED the
23
day of January
, 1960.
ATTESTs
APPROVED:
Laura Rs.y
CITY SECRETARY
MAYOR
I'
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO.
BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that Ordinance
No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance), adopted January 9, 1984 and as heretofore
amended, be and the same is hereby amended at the following sections:
SECTION III - DEFINITIONS: Add the following wording:
Vehicle, Commuter: Passenger Automobiles, motorcycles, trucks
and vans not exceeding 3/4 ton nominal capacity; pickup trucks
not exceeding one ton nominal capacity; busses and vans deed for
mass commuting and not exceeding one ton nominal capacity nor
having seating for more than twelve persons including the driver.
Vehicle, Recreational: Self propelled motor vehicle or "motor
home" "intended to provide mobile living quarters for one or more
persons and used for recreational purposes; "Winnebago" or
similar.
Truck, Pickup: A vehicle in factory original configuration and
being designated by its manufacturer as being a pickup truck; not
including vehicles with special purpose bodies or beds installed
by dealers or customizers.
Trailer, private: A travel trailer, boat trailer, cargo trailer
or any non-self propelled wheeled vehicle intended to be towed
behind a commuter vehicle and used for recreational purposes or
to transport goods and materials for home use; not including
commercial trailer or house trailer.
Trailer, Commercial: Any trailer not "qualifying as a private
trailer or commercial trailer.
Vehicle, Parking of: The temporary and short term stationary
placement of an unoccupied vehicle on a paved surface where the
vehicle is fully operational and used on a frequent basis; does
not include storage.
Vehicle, Storage of: The temporary or permanent long term
placement of an unoccupied vehicle on a paved surface where the
vehicle is either not fully operational or is not used for
commuting purposes at least monthly.
Parking: see Vehicle, Parking of.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
Storage: see Vehicle, Storage of.
Residential District: Any zoning district whose classification
allows as a permitted use or as a legal nonconforming use the
construction or maintenance of dwellings for human habitation;
including, but not limited to: R-l, R-2, R-3, R-4-SD, R-5-D,
R-6-T, R-7-MF, AG, and any and all portions of planned
developments allowing residential construction; includes mobile
home parks and special use residential property whether
conforming or not.
SECTION 9.4.1: Delete all wording and add the following:
District area requirements: one acre.
SECTION 24.15: Delete all wording and add the following:
24.15 PARKING AND STORAGE OF VEHICLES
24.15.1 This section applies to all residential districts.
24.15.2 Parking of Commuter Vehicles: Commuter vehicles may be
parked on paved driveways located anywhere on a platted
lot or tract of land within a residential district
~_within required front, side and rear yards
~:t~_ thè ~.!~h~_of waroetw~rb
/~-Df-',..lLç_UJ"be~~!-,...~.~~_~..e!. and i:lië ~ne_of said
lot or tract provideº tìiatsucn- paved drivewa.Is .»!!~-L@
co~si:-ructëd"'pur·s·~';nt ·to··~'a~-'v aIT~f· "b'uifd-[ng·"·~permitr. Wh ere
curb does not exist on the abutting public street,
vehicles parked in driveways shall be positioned such
that no part of any vehicle is closer than 25 feet from
the centerline of said street or the right of way line
whichever is less. Commuter vehicles may also be
parked along the curb on paved public streets for
periods not to exceed 16 hours per day and provided
that such location is not a designated no parking zone
or upon a street designated as a collector, major or
arterial thoroughfare on the most recent city master
thoroughfare plan. Where curb does not exist on the
abutting public street, vehicles parked along the
street shall be positioned such that no part of any
vehicle is closer than 25 feet from the centerline of
said street. Vehicles ~ay not be parked so as to block
any sidewalks which exist in public right of way.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 3
24.15.3 Storage of Commuter Vehicles: A maximum of two
commuter vehicles may be stored on any platted lot or
tract in a residential district. Such stored vehicles
must be placed on paved!Y.Ú.A.~.~.~.,.~,l1d ~~"...~,cr~en~~d from
all public view. Such stored vehicles may be' located
anywhere on said lot or tract behind the front building
line including within required side and rear yards,
provided however that._._~()_~y~JJ..~ç¡e may be sto:red witbin
~en feet of t~~...principa·lstr~cture on~11f!2~~p~rt.y
unlèss' '''it is aaraged with<iri"'said""'príncipál' structure.
'.'..""'1_,..~.:...~_-..:;r"'~'"7' ~.__.,,,.-~.- '~'. ",,-, R
24.15.4 Temporary Parking: Recreational vehicles and private
trailers may be parked within residential districts on
the same basis as commuter vehicles for periods not to
exceed 24 continuous hours nor more than three full or
partial 24 hour periods in any consecutive seven day
period.
24.15.5 Storage of Non-Commuter Vehicles: Recreational
vehicles and private trailers may be stored in
residential districts on paved surfaces located behind
the front building line and screened from all public
view including within required rear and side yards but
no closer than ten feet from the principal structure on
a given lot or tract unless garaged within said
principal structure. Recreational vehicles and private
trailers in storage may not be occupied nor connected
to any utility that would permit, facilitate or enhance
occupancy.
24.25.6 Agricultural Exemption: The requirements of this
section will not apply to any portion of an AG zoned
tract actually in use for farming or ranching. A valid
agricultural exemption from the Tarrant Appraisal
District will be considered as proof of agricultural
use.
24.15.7 Other Vehicles Prohibited: Parking or storage of any
vehicle except as above permitted is prohibited in a
residential district. .
24.15.8 Variances: The Zoning Board of Adjustment will hear
requests for variances from these requirements and such
variances, if granted, will specify a specific
individual vehicle by VIN number and Texas registration
tag number, a specific individual person by name and a
specific individual platted lot or tract of land by
street address and either lot and block or metes and
bounds, and the specific date no more than five years
after the effective date of the variance upon which
said variance will expire. Said variance will expire
upon the earliest of the following: expiration date of
variance, disposal of the specified vehicle by the
specified individual, at any time when the specified
property ceases to be the principal residence of the
specified individual.
I-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 4
CREATE THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS AS RECORDS OF COUNCIL ACTION AND
ADMINISTRATIVELY ADD WORDING AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED FOR:
28.13
RECORD OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
28.14
RECORD OF ZONING CHANGES
28.15
RECORD OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
The amendments contained herein and the amendments adopted under
Ordinance Number 1112 as well as all future amendments to Ord~nance
Number 1080 are to be àdministratively incorporated into the body of
the Zoning Ordinance book published by this city and available for
purchase by the public. Revisions to the Zoning Ordinance book are to
be accomplished as follows: pages containing amended sections are to
be revised and the date of the most recent revision shown on the
revised page. Fractional page numbers may be used if necèssary to
insert large bodies of additional text. Where large bodies of text
are deleted, pages will be consolidated and resulting blank pages will
remain with page numbers and the notation "This page intentionally
left blank."
Section 28.13: Record of Ordinance Amendments will be revised after
each amendment to the general requirements of Ordinance Number 1080.
Sections 28.14, Record of Zoning Changes and 28.15, Record of Planned
Developments shall be revised subsequent to the passage of this
ordinance to reflect all such changes approved by council between
January 9, 1984 and the effective date of this ordinance as well as
all existing planned developments recognized in the adoption of the
zoning map in Ordinance Number 1080. Sections 28.14 and 28.15 will be
subsequently revised every time the official published zoning map is
revised or more often as determined by the city manager, but no less
often than once per year.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS
DAY OF
, 1984.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Hoore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 10, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
Mayor Echols called the meeting to order September 10, 1984,
at 7:30 p.m.
2.
Present:
Dan Echols
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
Virginia Moody
Harold Newman
Jim Ramsey
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
Gene Riddle
Richard Albin
Lee Maness
Press:
Duward Bean
Mark England
Mike Towle
Absent:
Jim Kenna
Richard Davis
3.
Mayor
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
City Attorney
Director Public Works/Utilities
City Engineer
Finance Director
Northeast Chronicle
Mid Cities Daily News
Star Telegram
Councilman
Mayor Pro Tem
The invocation was given by Councilwoman Moody.
4.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to approve the minutes of the August 27, 1984 meeting.
Motion carried 4-0, Councilman Newman abstaining due to
absence.
5.
None
6.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
1
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 27, 1984
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
REMOVING ITEM (S)
FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM(S) INDICATED
BY ASTERISK (7, 8, 9;
10, 20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 25 & 26)
APPROVED
I
I *7.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
*8.
*9.
Ie *10.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
11. Mayor Echols advised that since this was an appeal hearing
and required six votes the case would be postponed until
October 8, 1984.
Page 2
September 10, 1984
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-58, REQUEST OF
J. L. WATSON COMPANY
FOR REPLAT OF LOTS lA
AND IB, BLOCK 2,
WALKERS BRANCH
ADDITION
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-70, REQUEST OF
COLLINS & COLGAN FOR
FINAL PLAT OF BLOCKS
27 THRU 32, FOX
HOLLOW ADDITION
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-71, REQUEST OF
BURK COLLINS
INVESTMENTS FOR
REPLAT OF LOTS 4R-6R,
BLOCK 10 & LOTS 8R &
9R, BLOCK 29, FOX
HOLLOW ADDITION.
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 84-77ER, REQUEST
OF JOHN L. & JOHN R.
DREILING FOR
ENGINEERING REVIEW OF
THE RECORDED FINAL
PLAT OF ROYAL OAKS
ADDITION
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL
HEARING-PZ 84-52,
REQUEST OF MR. & MRS.
DOYNE S. BYRD TO
REZONE LOT 3R, BLOCK
23, CLEARVIEW
ADDITION FROM C-I
(COMMERCIAL) TO
C-2-SPECIFIC USE-SALE
OF USED AUTOS
(LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF MAPLEWOOD
DRIVE AT GRAPEVINE
HIGHWAY)
POSTPONED
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
12. Postponed.
13. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward.
No one appeared.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to the request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the
public hearing.
14. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to
approve PZ 84-58, Ordinance No. 1151.
Motion carried 5-0.
15. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward.
Mr. Jack Fluitt, Stembridge & Associates, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Fluitt stated the zoning change was being requested in
order for Mr. Martin to build two single family homes on the
lots.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the public hearing.
16. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve PZ 84-59, Ordinance No. 1152.
Motion carried 5-0.
Page 3
September 10, 1984
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ
84-52
POSTPONED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING PZ
84-58, REQUEST OF
NORTHEAST DRUG,
INC./TOWN AND COUNTRY
DRUG #2 TO REZONE LOT
lOR, LONSDALE
ADDITION FROM C-2
(COMMERCIAL) TO
C-2-SPECIFIC USE-SALE
OF BEER FOR OFF
PREMISE CONSUMPTION
(LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF
DAVIS BOULEVARD AND
HARWOOD ROAD)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ
84-58
ORDINANCE NO. 1151
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING PZ
84-59, REQUEST OF F.
WAYNE MARTIN TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 1AlA, JOHN
CONDRA SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 310, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO R-3
(SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF DOUGLAS LANE,
APPROXIMATELY 700
FEET SOUTH OF BURSEY
ROAD)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 84-59
ORDINANCE NO. 1152
APPROVED
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
17. Mayor Echols stated that an error had been made on the Zoning
Map and the Planning and Zoning Commission has asked that it
be corrected.
Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak in favor or in opposition,
Mayor Echols closed the public hearing.
18. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Ordinance No. 1153.
Motion carried 5-0.
19. Mr. Richard Leach, 7659 Northeast Loop 820, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Leach stated he owned the commercial property located at
7659 Northeast Loop 820 and wanted to place a billboard sign
at that location. Mr. Leach stated that he was in compliance
with the Sign Ordinance with the exception of the requirement
that a billboard could not be within 100 feet of a residence.
Mr. Leach stated there were only two residences within 100
feet and he had signed letters from them stating they had no
objections to the billboard.
Mr. Line stated it had been brought to the City's attention
that the sign would be within 500 feet of an existing
billboard which would be in violation of the ordinance.
Mayor Echols asked the size of the sign.
Mr. Leach stated it was 14 X 28.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody to
deny the request.
Motion carried 5-0.
*20.
Page 4
September 10, 1984
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING be
CONSIDERATION OF
CHANGE IN ZONING FROM
R-l (SINGLE FAMILY)
TO AG (AGRICULTURE)
GREEN VALLEY ESTATES
AS RECOMMENDED BY THE
PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE CHANGING
ZONING FROM R-1
(SINGLE FAMILY) TO AG
(AGRICULTURE) OF
PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN
AGENDA ITEM #17
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF MR.
RICHARD LEACH AND MR.
TRACY LOUDON FOR A
VARIANCE TO THE SIGN
ORDINANCE
D~Im
CONSIDERATION OF
ADDITION OF TAPE
DRIVE TO SYSTEM 36
APPROVED
I Page 5 i
September 10, 1984
I
I -*21. CONSIDERATION OF
AUTHORIZATION OF
TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR
I RENOVATION OF HOUSE
ON BURSEY ROAD FOR
SENIOR CITIZENS
CENTER
I APPROVED
*22. CONSIDERATION OF
I ORDINANCE CREATING
THE POSITION OF
ALTERNATE CIVIL
I SERVICE COMMISSIONER
APPROVED
*23. CONSIDERATION OF
I PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE Ill, TO
GIBBONS CONSTRUCTION
I COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT
OF $61,921.95 -
CALLOWAY ACRES STREET
l_ AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
I *24. CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE 112, TO M. A.
I VINSON CONSTRUCTION
COMP ANY IN THE AMOUNT
OF $47,543.31 -
WALKER'S BRANCH
I DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
I *25. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR OVERSIZING WATER
AND SEWER MAINS FOR
I OAK HILLS SUBDIVISION
APPROVED
*26. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
I FOR STREETS, CURB AND
GUTTER FOR OAK HILLS
SUBDIVISION
I APPROVED
I_
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
27. Mayor Echols presented the following proposed CIP Projects for
1984-85:
On August 27, 1984 the CIP Committee met and discussed
various options available concerning Morgan Meadows East,
Chapman Drive and Hewitt Street. The CIP Committee recommends
approval of the following projects: Morgan Meadows East -
Construct channel in 37.5 Foot Easement, $654,000 -
Construction of ditches along both sides of Hightower Road to
direct runoff water into the east and west channels and to
prevent the flooding across Hightower and Little Ranch Road,
$49,830 - Construction of ditches along both sides on North
Forty Road between Meadow Road and the east channel to direct
the water into this channel and prevent flooding of this road
and area, $75,020; Chapman Drive - Construct 41' street, Total
Project Cost $1,300,000 - property owner participation
$546,389 - Net ultimate cost to City $753,611; Hewitt Street
and Drainage - Construct underground storm drains in Hewitt
Street and 31 foot standard residential street - Total Project
Cost $460,000 - Less utility adjustments $35,000, Total Hewitt
Street $425,000. Total of all projects $2,503,850.
The current fund balance in the Unappropriated Street and
Drainage Account is $2,708,440. There will be property owner
participation in the Chapman Drive and Hewitt Street Projects
which will reduce the City's cost as indicated above.
However, it will be necessary to appropriate the total
estimated costs, and all future assessment and other property
owner participation amounts will be credited back to the
unspecified account.
Councilman Ramsey stated he was against passing 1.3 million
dollars for Chapman Road even though the road was in desperate
need of repairs. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt this was
the type of issue that should go to the public in the form of
a bond issue to be voted on by the community at large.
Councilman Ramsey stated he was in deep support of Morgan
Meadows East and Hewitt street drainage.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher to
approve the Morgan Meadows East and Hewitt Street project,
delete the Chapman Road project.
Councilman Fisher stated he also expressed Councilman Ramsey's
concern, and wondered what the City was going to do with
Chapman.
Councilwoman Hinkle stated she believed that the Council had
fulfilled almost all if not all of the comments concerning the
bond money and she felt the City should go ahead with Chapman
Road.
Councilwoman Moody stated she would like to remind the Council
that Mr. Riddle had advised that all the repairs that could be
done to Chapman would not do any good until the drainage was
fixed.
Page 6
September 10, 1984
CONSIDERATION OF
1984-85 CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mayor Echols stated that if the Chapman project was denied the
appropriation for Hewitt would have to be increased some
$80,000 to cover the culvert which would otherwise have been
included in the Chapman project.
Motion to approve Hewitt Street and Morgan Meadows East, delete
Chapman Road, failed by a vote of 3-2; Councilman Newman and
Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody voting against; Councilmen Ramsey
and Fisher voting for.
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve the appropriation funds for the Chapman Road, Hewitt
Street and Morgan Meadows Ease projects.
Motion carried 3-2; Councilman Newman and Councilwoman Hinkle
and Moody voting for; Councilmen Ramsey and Fisher voting
against.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher to
remove from the table the proposal for the off-street parking
ordinance.
Motion carried 5-0.
28. None
29. Mayor Echols adjourned the meeting of September 10, 1984 and
advised that the Council would go into Executive Session.
Dan Echols - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
Page 7
September 10, 1984
r
.
I
ITEM REMOVED
FROM TABLE
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
ADJOURNMENT
I
I
I-
I
I .
I
[-
7
I
II
'I
I
I
I
I-
I
eity of ~orth -rochland Hills '
Star of the ~etroplex
((!ertifitate of ~erbite
THE STATE OF TEXAS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TO:
VUANE HICKMAN
IN RECOGNITION OF
F,¿ve.
- YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE
TO THE CITY IN THE
Fbte.
DEPARTMENT.
DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS 24th
DAY OF
Se.p.tembVL, 7984
City Manager
Departlnent Head
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
City of J(8rth Richland Hills, Texas
TO:
Rodger Line
City Manager
DATE: September 20, 1984
FROM: Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Platting cases to be heard by City Council September 24, 1984
PS 84-4 Request of James R. Phillips for Short
Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 32, College
Hill Addition.
PS 84-74 Request of Ruth Hodges Blessing for
Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 1,
W. A. Blessing Addition.
PS 84-75 Request of Cary Vollintine for Final
Plat of Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3, Tapp
Addition.
PS 84-102 Request of F. Wayne Martin for Final
Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 4,
Londonderry Addition (previously
submitted as Martin-Withers Addition).
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118
AG
AG
R-3
¡
DATE ORDINANCE NO.
REVISIONS AFTER
LEG E N
-bQ!.
ZONING MAP OF NORTH RICBLAND RILLS
TH1S M·AP CURRENT THROUGH ORDINANCE NO. t085 OR
-.UGH LAST ORDINANCE LfSTED IN REVISION BLOCt<"
I
I
-e
I SUBJECT:
DATE: September 20, 1984
PS 84-4 Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 32, College Hill Addition.
I
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
I BACKGROUND: This property is located at 6003 Davis Boulevard, but does not have any
frontage on Davis. It is approximately 93 feet west of Ross Road. They received a
I variance from the ZBA for no street frontage.
I
There was some question as to fire protection, but Mr. Bronstad found that it was
I
I
covered.
All corrèctions have been made. The owner does feel it is unnecessary to get a new
I 4IÞercolation test since the existing septic system is performing adequately.
I
I
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this Short Form Plat subject to
the Engineer's comments with the exception of items 2 and 5.
I
I
I
I
IWY
I
COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial of plat.
.~
...2J~ ð-__
()~
IUDCETED ITOt:
YES
10
x
· {þ ,
I RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
_ RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
..
("'
('
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
September 2, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-804, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
COLLEGE HILLS ADDITION,
LOT 2, BLOCK 32,
DRAINAGE STUDY AND UTILITIES,
PS 84 - 4, GRID MAP 96
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following
comments: See comments in our review letter dated July 26, 1984.
Please call if you have any questions.
September 2, 1984 PS 84 - 4 PAGE
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-e211 . METRO/267-3367
1
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
r
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
August 22, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lot 2, Block 32, COLLEGE HILL
ADDITION, Short Form Plat,
PS 84-4
In response to Know1ton-Eng1ish-F1owers letter dated July 26,
1984, we offer the fo11uwing comments:
1. The owner of this property believes that the responsibility
of providing a fire hydrant lies with the adjacent
property owner on the East who originally platted his
lot and agreed before the City Council that he would
provide the necessary fire protection. Our client feels
that the City should insist that Mr. Parks live up to his
agreement to install this fire hydrant.
2. The owner of this property feels that a percolation test
is unnecessary at this time since the existing septic
system is performing adequately.
3. Property corner monumentation has been shown on the plat.
4. We note the existance of the variance granted June 26, 1984.
If there should be any further questions, please do not hesitate
to call.
Sincerely,
DRS/et
cc:
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363
I ,.~~
. Jr
II
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
('
r-
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 26, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-804, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
COLLEGE HILL ADDITION,
LOT 2, BLOCK 32,
SHORT FORM PLAT,
PS 84 - 4, GRID ~AP 96
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1
We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been
provided for this property.
Although this property is presently served by septic sewer system, we would
recommend that percolation tests be taken and results furnished to the Health
Department to confirm that the existing system complies with Health Department
cri teri a.
2
3
In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should
be noted on the plat.
We would note for the record that a variance has been approved for this lot
dated June 26, 1984, waiving the requirement for street frontage.
Please call if you have any questions.
.~
4
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
July 26, 1984
PS 84 - 4
PAGE
1
S!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
"t" __--:-_c,"'""""'" -,- ·--"·~-___."'M ,~..,.....' ,.~-......-
Page 5 (
P & Z Minutes
July 26, 1984
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie--
I
........~.íW~~~:....~~~;-...;,¡¡·..._I~...,....,.~ ..ø,.~
>'~ ··..¡.,_ct.......·_ _--........_\;.....~.. ~'.~..........-..·..·_....'...I".'_...._u .~.. j.ò........._,... ......
(
2.
PS 84-4
Request of James R. Phillips for
reconsideration of a request for Short
Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 32, College
Hill Addition.
Delbert Stembridge came forward to
represent Mr. Phillips.
Mr. Hannon said that in the letter of
January 10th, they objected to
providing fire coverage. He asked if
they still do not plan to provide fire
coverage.
Mr. Stembridge said an adjacent
property owner was supposed to install
a fire hydrant, but they never did so
Hr. Phillips does not feel he should
have to either.
Mr. Hannon said it was up to the City
Staff to see that the requirements are
met.
Mr. Stembridge said since it had been
so long in getting the plat approved,
they would agree to install the fire
hydrant.
Mr. Hannon said since the Commission
denied the plat in January because of
no street frontage, the Zoning Board
of Adjustment granted a variance from
the SO foot road frontage requirement.
PS 84-4
APPROVED
Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve
PS 84-4 subject to the Engineer's
comments with the exception of items 2
and 5; 12 requiring they show existing
structures on plat and #5 requiring
street frontage. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion
carried 3-1 with Ms. Nash voting
against.
3.
PS 84-66
Request of Wayne Wal
f ary plat of Blocks 13-16,
Briarwood Estates, 5th Filing.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
Ie
I
{'
( '.
r
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
APPLICATIONS FOR VARIANCES
I, THE UNDERSIGNED APPLICANT, HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION FOR A VAR1ANCE OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE ON THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED I~TY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
~/(Jb-;L OF~ /JeJ IN
TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS.
ADDITION
BUILDING PERMIT WAS REJECTED BECAUSE:
I AM THE ~- LESSEE -
) OF THE PROPERTY.
(OTHER, SPECIFY)
~
:??/¿¡
~RE OF AP LICAN
s;Þý 8Y
DATE
THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN APPROVED
x
ADJUSTMENT THIS 26th DAY OF
JUNE
DATE FOR FILING - 15TH OF MONTH
$ 75.00 for Residential
$150.00 for Commercial
10 copies of plat or site plan
~~F~ ~J
f S-~- c:¿;) ç/S-
TELEPHONE
DISAPPROVED
BY THE BOARD OF
, 19 84
T
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 4
Z B A Minutes
June 26, 1984
2. BA 84-11
r
r
Request of James Phillips to vary from
the Zoning Ordinance #1080 on Tract
10D2, J. H. Barlough Survey, Abstract
130, to allow him to plat the property
without the required street frontage.
This property is located approximately
133 feet West of Davis Boulevard and
approximately 93 feet from Ross Road.
Chairman Roseberry appointed Mr. Hans
Kossler to act as Chairman during this
request due to a conflict of interest.
Mr. James Phillip came forward. He
said the land was developed during the
1960's and there had been a business
there ever since then. He bought it
in December, 1983. It had never been
platted. When he tried to ,plat it he
found out that it didn't have enough
road frontage. He said he had tried
to buy adjacent property in order to
have adequate road frontage, but the
owner would not sell.
Mr. Kassler asked Mr. Phillips if he
was aware of this road frontage
problem prior to buying the property.
Mr. Phillips said he was not aware of
the problem.
Mr. Cypert asked if there were any
buildings on the property now.
Mr. Phillips said there was a 35 X 30
foot brick building in the southwest
corner of the lot. He said the
building had been there longer than
the utility easement.
Mr. Kossler asked Mr. Phillips if he
had deeded access to his property.
Mr. Phillips said he did have deeded
access to his property.
Mr. Schubert asked Mr. Phillips what
his plans for the property were.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 5
Z B A Minutes
June 26, 1984
(
( \.
( ("
Mr. Phillips said he owned Northeast
Fence Company, which is presently
located on Davis Boulevard, and has
plans to move it to the property in
question.
Mr. Schubert asked Mr. Phillips if he
felt the 15 foot entrance way was
adequate for his business.
Mr. Phillips said it was much larger
than the lot he is presently using.
Mr. Schubert asked if the lot and
entrance way was paved or gravel.
Mr. Phillips said it was gravel.
Acting Chairman Han Kossler opened the
Public Hearing and called for those
wishing to speak in favor of this
request to please come forward.
Mr. D. Phillips of 6208 Abbott Drive
came forward. He said he had owned
all of the property at one time, but
he broke it up into three lots and
sold it. He said he felt his son's
business would benefit from the move.
Mr. Schubert asked if the inspector
came out to look at the easement when
it was being built.
Mr. Phillips said the inspector at
that time made the inspection and told
Mr. Philiips to put the building on
the building line.
Mr. Schubert asked Mr. Phillips what
would happen if the request was turned
down and a 50 foot egress be required.
Mr. Phillips stated that it would
cause his son's business to fail.
There is no one that will sell their
property for them to use as an entrance.
Mr. Jack Roseberry, 8912 Martin Drive,
came forward. He said the shape of
his property was unusual and it would
be very impractical for him to sell
the corner of it to Mr. Phillips.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 6 (
Z B A Minutes
June 26, 1984
BA 84-11
APPROVED
OLD BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
SECRETARY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
("
Councilwoman Virginia Moody, 7720
Cedar Park Avenue, came forward. She
said she thought Mr. Phillips
represented a very important part of
the City, meaning the small
independent businessmen. She said she
hoped the Board Members would vote in
favor of this request.
Mr. James Park, 4733 Redondo, came
forward. He owns the property which
is adjacent to the north side Mr.
Phillips property. He said he had no
objection to the variance.
The Acting Chairman asked for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the acting Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Schubert asked MS. Moss if there
had been any correspondence received
on this request.
MS. Moss said there had been none.
Mr. Cypert made the motion to approve
BA 84-11 to allow Mr. Phillips to plat
the property without the required
street frontage. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Hubbard and the motion
carried 4-0 with the following vote
recorded: Schubert, yea, Kassler,
yea, Hubbard, yea, Cypert, yea,
Chairman Roseberry abstaining.
None.
The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M.
CHAIRMAN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 3 ~
P & Z Minutes
January 26, 1984
(
3. PS 84-2
I
I
PS 84-2
APPROVED
I
I
Ire
I
I
4.
PS 84-4
PS 84-4
DENIED
I
I
I
I
I
5.
PS 84-8
6.
PS 84-9
I
The motion
Chairman Tucker stated
needs more information
drainage.
Request of
Lots 5 & 6
Additio .
for final plat of
Mollie B. Collins
. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-2. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen.
Mr. Hannon asked how they plan to
handle Odell Street.
Mr. Bronstad said Odell Street is
already in and they will have to bore
under the street for water and sewer.
The motion to approve PS 84-2 carried
5-0.
Request of James R. Phillips for Short
Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 32, College
Hill Addition.
Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny
PS 84-4 since this lot has no street
frontage. He said the Subdivision
Ordinance requires 50 feet of street
frontage.
The motion to deny was seconded by Mr.
Wood and the motion carried 5-0.
Chairman Tucker stated they wou
the next two cases togeth ut
vote on them separat
Barfield for
of Lot 3, Block 1,
Request of David Barfield for final
plat of Lot 3, Block 1, Martin
Addition.
Chairman Tucker stated that regarding
item #4, the pro rata had already been
paid.
I
I '
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
r
\
('
Æ'
:'
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
January 24, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lot 2, Block 32, College Hills
Addn. Short Form Plat, PS 84-04
In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated January 10,1984,
we offer the following comments:
1. All easements requested by the utility compan1es have been
added to the plat.
2. It has not in the past been City policy to require show-
ing the location of structures on plats which are to be
recorded as Final Plats with the County. Since this is
a short form plat and must meet the requirements of a
Final Plat, we do not feel it appropriate to show existing
structures. This lot is presently served by water and
sewer and no new services are being proposed at this time.
Again, the short form plat does not require showing the
location of existing utilities.
3. No new utilities are being proposed for this lot. No
utility plans are required for a short form plat.
4. This lot is already served by an adequate septic tank
sewer system. The building existing on this lot will
not require any upgrading of this facility.
5. The property located just west of this lot was mistakenly
identified as Tract 8 in the City tax map. The property
actuallyis a part of tract lOB belonging to G.R. Montgomery,
and the tract has frontage on Davis Blvd.
If there are any further questions regarding these lots, please do
not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
~iM~ ~ -(/Â
~bert R. Stembr1~-ðp.E.
DRS/bb
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363
I.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(;~
r
KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
January 10, 1984
~ Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-804, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
COLLEGE HILLS ADDN., LOT 2, BLOCK 32,
SHORT FORM PLAT, PS 84-04, GRID 96
We have reviéwed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. Utility companies should be contacted to determine if any easements
are required to serve this lot.
2. The subdivision ordinance requires that all existing permanent
structures be shown on the plat. Also, if this lot is presently
served by water and sewer then we would request that the location of
these services be shown or noted.
3. Although water and sewer plans have not been submitted to our office
for review, it appears that adequate fire hydrant coverage has not
been provided for this lot based on the 300-foot radius requirement
for Commercial Zoning.
4. Plans for septic tank sewer system should be submitted to the County
Health Department for review and approval, and the results of
percolation tests should be furnished to the City before this
development is approved.
5. Consideration should be given to requiring the developer of this
property to provide an ingress/egress easement to Tract 8 located
just west of this lot if necessary. If a dedicated right-of-way is
required then such right-of-way should be improved to city
standards, and plans for these improvements should be submitted for
review and approval.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
January 10, 1984 PS 84-04 PAGE 1
!5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
r
r
i
r
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
January 10, 1984
PS 84-04
PAGE
2
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I_
I
(
(
Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer
TESCO Region Engr. Mgr.
P.O. Box 970
Fort Worth, TX 76101
RE: City File Reference Number: PS 84-4
College Hill Addition, Block 32, Lot 2
Address or Location: 6003 Davis Boulevard
Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the
proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office.
Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning
Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland
Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than January 11,
1984.
Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office.
~ Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor
corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments)
Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made.
(See Comments)
COMMENTS:
S P' -.- .... ~-, ~~'!T r!,\p) ELECTRIC
__--. \01" ¡ [. "-.. . , _. . . v 1\
D!STR!?)U:¡:~:~ ~'\~.~" !¿S, !~.S SHO\VN
ON THE AI Tt\C~ 1£0 SKETCH.
TESCO: DATE /~...,,~ - ~~ SIGNATURE {~.~. ';;ie-J~ ft?
.. /'
CITY: DATE: December 20, 1983 SIGNATURE .¿/~Ca Q~44;T
r
I
q
I
-e
IUBJECT:
DATE:
September 20, 1984
PS 84-74
Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, W. A. Blessing Addition.
I
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
~ACKGROUND: This property is located on the north side of Glenview Drive (Hobby Horse Corral).
The owner wishes to use her deceased husband's name for the name of the subdivision.
II The pro rata for water and sewer was paid at the time the taps were made.
existing building.
This is an
I
The P~anning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this Short Form Plat subject
to the Engineer's comments with the exception of item 1.
Ie
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
IIC4ìj COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of Short Form Plat.
I
IUDCETED ITOt:
-2J~
r!~
YES
110
x
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
('
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 'OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
SEPTEMBER 13, 1984 - 7:30 P. M.
PRESENT:
Chairman
Secretary
Members
CALL TO ORDER
........ ----......- -----...... ""'\ 'C........-.._..........; ".:4Þ_~.~,,~-""""_ ............_'-. .....~'..........;.-..-r"............-.._,...,..___ -'~~"~'..N'"".
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF AUGUST 23, 1984
1.
2.
//
//
/
PS 84-66 /~
Denied 8/23/84~/
,/
,,/
//
/-
//
PS 84-66
APPROVED
PS 84-74
The meeting was called to order by the
Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:35 P.
George ucker
ie Nash
Wood
ohn Schwinger
Carroll Brents
Alt. Member
Councilwoman
p & Z Coordi
Virginia Moody
Wanda Calvert
ABSENT:
Don Bowen
Ms. ash made the motion to approve
e minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the
motion carried 4-0 with Mr. Wood
abstaining since he was not present at
the meeting.
Request of Wayne Wall Builders for
reconsideration of the preliminary
plat of Blocks 13 thru 16, Briarwood
Estates, 5th Filing (previously
submitted as Willow Park Addition).
Chairman Tucker stated they have
complied with all the Engineer's
comments and letters.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 84-66. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Ruth Hodges Blessing for
Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 1,
W. A. Blessing Addition.
Chairman Tucker stated they have
answers to the Engineer's comments and
they request the name of the
Subdivision be allowed to remain for
personal reasons. He said he had no
objection to that.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2 (
P & Z Minutes
September 13, 1984
(~'"
PS B4-74
APPROVED
Ms Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-74 subject to the Engineer's
comments with the exception of item
#1. This motion was seconded by Mr.
Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0.
3.
PS 84-80
Request of Kingswood Estates
Inc. for preliminary plat of
Addition.
Charles Evans, Attorney, came f
to represent the owners. He
Engineer, Mr. Long, has re onded to
all the comments with ex ption to the
name change. Mr. Evan stated they do
not wish to change t name of this
subdivision. He s~~ they are east of
an area call~. d G en Valley Country
Estates which not a recorded plat
so they do n feel they should have
to change e name of their
subdivi ·on.
Cha an Tucker said he agreed there
,~. " no reason to change it to Green
/alley.
PS 84-80 ~ Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
APPROVED ~~' PS 84-80 subject to the Engineer's
~ comments with the exception of item
// #1. This motion was seconded by Ms.
,/' Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
,,//1 Chairman Tucker stated they would hear
/; the next two cases together.
/
4. PS 84-101~ Request of F. Wayne Martin for
preliminary plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block
4, Londonderry Addition (previously
submitted as Lots 1 & 2, Block 1,
Martin-Withers Addition).
PS 84-102
Request of F. Wayne Martin for final
plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 4,
Londonderry Addition (previously
submitted as Lots 1 & 2, Block 1,
Martin-Withers Addition).
-- ~'!II!1-----.~~'~·~W~~~'Ot...~, ~
I
I ENGINEERS ·
_ 3921 VANCE ROAD
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
(/
JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS
PLANNERS
· FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118
.
284-0981
August 28, 1984
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. BOX 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lot 1, Block 1
W.A. Blessing Addition
North Richland Hills, Texas
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
We have reviewed Mr. Richard W. Albin, P.E.·s letter dated July 31, 1984 and
offer the following comments:
1. The subdivision ordinance under Section 1-03, paragraph D, item 2, page
15 states: "Proposed name of the subdivision, which shall not have the
same spelling or be pronounced similar to the name of any other
subdivision located within the City or within the extra-territorial
jurisdiction of the City, unless subsequent filing of existing
subdivision. II We respectfully request that the name IIW.A. Blessingll be
allowed to remain unchanged, as requested by his widow Mrs. Ruth
Blessing and family.
2. The owner's address and phone number has been added to the plat.
3. The exisiting zoning has been added to the plat.
4. & 5. The pro-rata for water and sewer was paid at the time the water
and sewer taps were made.
6. The contractor is required by the plans to contact Lone Star Gas prior
to construction.
We trust our response is sufficient for placement on the agenda. Should
additional information be required, please call.
Mrs. Ruth Blessing & Family
Mr. Richard Albin, P.E.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 31, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-899f CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BLESS NG ADDN., L. 1, B. 1,
(DIAMOND LOCH ADDITION),
SHORT FORM PLAT,
PS 84 - 74, GRID MAP 147
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 We would recommend that the name of this proposed subdivision be changed from
the IIBlessing Addition" to the Diamond Loch Addition" since this development
is contiguous with Diamond Loch. Also the lot and block number should be
changed accordingly.
2 The Owner's address and phone number should be noted on the plat.
3 The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat.
4 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing a-inch
water line in Rufe Snow Drive. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear
foot for one-half of the existing line for a total length of 219.11 feet.
5 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 6-inch
sanitary sewer line located at the rear of this lot. We would estimate
prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for one-half of the existing line for a total
length of 220.51 feet.
6 Lone Star Gas should be contacted, as noted on the plans, before any
construction in the vicinity of the existing gas main in Glenview Drive.
Please call if you have any questions.
{1¿aJ-cÆ/. ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
July 31, 1984
PS 84 - 74
PAGE
1
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I
I
-e
IsUBJECT:
/c')
I '-"
DATE: September 20, 1984
PS 84-75 Final plat of Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3, Tapp Addition.
~£P ARTKENT:
Planning and Zoning
~ACKGROUND: This property is located on the west side of Rufe Snow Driver approximately
300 feet south of Browning Drive.
I
All the Engineer's comments have been met with the exception of item 1 of his letter of
I
September 2, 1984 regard ing the extension of the 8" water I ine to the west.
They say they
feel no need for this as the property to the west of Lot 3 is currently developed into
Hilltop Apartment complex and a loop could not be completed.
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final plat.
I.-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of this final plat.
-- .
~Ía-~ þJ ~
I.UDGETED ITEM:
YES
110
x
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
(
r'"
~ )
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
September 13, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lots 1, 2, & 3, Block 3,
TAPP ADDITION, Revised Final
Plans PS 84-75
In response to the letter from Mr. Albin dated August 29, 1984,
we have made the change indicating \ the reinforcing steel in the
back of the wall instead of the face.
In response to the letter from Mr. Albin dated Sept. 2, 1984, we
feel no need for the extension of the 8" water line to the west
as the property west of Lot 3 is currently developed into Hilltop
Apartment complex and a loop could not be completed.
If there should be any further questions regarding this project,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
~
DRS/et
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363
I'
/ ~
I
Ie
I September 2, 1984
I Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
I North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
I
I
I 1
(
('
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
RE: 3-937Â CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TAPP DDITIO~J,
lOTS 1!2~ AND 3tABLOCK 3,
REVISED IHAL P NS,
PS 84 - 75, GRID MAP 111
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following
cOlllnents:
The proposed a-inch water line located along the south line of lot 3 should be
extended fully to the west side of this lot for future extensions.
lI~lease call if you have any questions.
~ t2I&:-
I - -- -- - -. - - - -- -, -. -'.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I September 2, 1984
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
P S 84 - 75
PAGE
1
!SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
IJ
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 29, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-960. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TAPP ADDITION,
LOTS I, 2, AND 3, BLOCK 3,
REVISED FINAL PLANS,
PS 84 - 75, GRID MAP 111
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 With reference to the proposed retaining wall design on sheet no. 7 of the
plans, we would recommend that the vertical wall reinforcing steel be moved
from the face of the wall to the back of the wall where the section will be in
tension from the backfill load. The face of the wall will be in compression
and only temperature steel would be required in the face. The plans should be
revised accordingly.
2 All other revisions have been made as recommended in our review letter dated
July 31, 1984.
if you have any questions.
~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
August 29, 1984
PS 84 - 75
PAGE
1
!S50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I·
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
August 23, 1984
r;:'
\"
C'
3. PS 84-75
Request of Cary Vollintine for final
plat of Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3, Tapp
Addition.
PS 84-75
APPROVED
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PS 84-75. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Brents and the motion
carried 4-0.
4. PS 84-66
Denied 7/26/84
Request of Wayne Wall Builder, Inc.
for reconsideration of the preliminary
plat of Blocks 13 thru 16, Briarwood
Estates, 5th Filing (previously
submitted as Willow Park Additio
Chairman Tucker stated he h a
request to speak on this at, but the
Commission does not usu ly debate on
platting with anyone her than the
engineer of the pI He said if
there are proble , they should be
brought to th attention of the City
Staff.
_
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
lie
I
,
MS. Nas said she would recommend
post ning this plat until the next
me ing, giving the client time to
rk out the problems.
Mrs. Calvert said, for legal purposes,
the Board should deny the plat instead
of postponing it.
Chairman Tucker said that was correct.
PS 84-66
DENIED
MS. Nash withdrew her first motion and
made the motion to deny PS 84-66
without prejudice and request it be
put on the next agenda which would be
in two weeks. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the
motion carried 4-0.
Chairman Tucker stated there is not an
engineer's letter since the plat has
been revised. He asked Mrs. Calvert
to check into this before it is heard
again.
I'
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I_
I
("
r
Stembridge & Associates, I ne.
Consulting Engineers
August 8, 1984
Planning and' Zoning Commission
City of North Rich1and Hills,
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-960, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TAPP ADDITION, LOTS
1, 2, & 3, BLOCK 3, PRELIMINARY
AND FINAL PLANS, PS 84-62.& P$ 84-75
In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated July 31,
1984, we offer the following response:
1. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the
Notary Certification has been fully executed.
2. It appears that the line dividing the property zoned C-2
(this zoning includes only Block 1, Tapp Addition) and the
property zoned 12 has been incorrectly placed or the
sketching of the property now being platted has been
incorrectly placed. The entire acreage of this proposed
Block 3 is within the 1-2 zoning.
3. The proposed 6-inch water line located along the south line
of Lot 3 has been changed to an a-inch line.
4. Complete design plans have been submitted for the proposed
retaining wall. The design conforms to CRSI design criteria.
If there should be any further questions regarding this project,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
~R,~)~
belbert R. Stem r1 ge, .E.
DRS/et
cc:
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
('
('
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
July 31. 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills. Texas 76118
RE: 3-960Ã CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TAPP DDITIOH,
LOTS 1,2 AND 3, BLOCK 3.
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANS,
PS 84 - 62, GRID MAP III
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat.
1~2 It appears that a portion of the property included in this proposed plat is
~ zoned C-2 based on the location of the I-2/C-2 dividing line shown on the
I zoning map. We would request that the developer's engineer confinm that the
entire proposed platted area is zoned 1-2 as noted on the plat.
I
I
I Please call if you have any questions.
m~~
II RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
I
I
I_
I July 31, 1984
3
The proposed 6-inch water line located along the south line of lot 3 should
be upsized to an a-inch diameter.
4
Plans should be provided for our review showing the dimensions and
reinforcing of the proposed retaining wall located along the south side of
Hilltop Drive. We would recommend CRSI design criteria with minimum highway
surcharge.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
PS 84 - 62
PAGE
1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
I
I
-e
I SUBJECT:
;1
DATE: September 20, 1984
PS 84-102 Final Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 4, Londonderry Addition (previously
submitted as Martin-Withers Addition.
I DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
I BACKGROUND: This property is located on the east side of Douglas Lane, approximately 700
feet south of Bursey Road.
I
I
All corrections have been made and all comments have been agreed to with the exception
to the fire coverage. They have fire coverage where the houses will be built so Mr.
Riddle suggested they put a building line on the back so no structure could be built there.
I
I
They wish to sign a covenant for future street improvements.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final plat subject to the
I_ngineer's comments.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Ie
Approval or denial of final plat.
'I.UDCETED ITEtS:
JJ~ ()~
YES
110
x
I~~
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I_
I
Page 2
p & Z Minutes
September 13, 1984
PS 84-74
APPROVED
3. PS 84-80
4. PS 84-101
5. PS 84-102
(
~
~-~~---
Ms Nash made the motion to approve
PS 84-74 subject to the Engineer'
comments with the exception of em
#1. This motion was seconde y Mr.
Schwinger and the motion ried 5-0.
Request of Kingswood
Inc. for prelimina
Addition.
Venture,
Fair Oaks
/..
Charles Ev~š, Attorney, came forward
to repreø€nt the owners. He said the
~ngin ~, Mr. Long, has responded to
a1 he comments with exception to the
me change. Mr. Evans stated they do
~not wish to change the name of this
~/ subdivision. He said they are east of
~ an area called Green Valley Country
/~ Estates which is not a recorded plat
so they do not feel they should have
/' to change the name of their
subdivision.
Chairman Tucker said he agreed there
is no reason to change it to Green
Valley.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 84-80 subject to the Engineer's
comments with the exception of item
II. This motion was seconded by MS.
Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
Chairman Tucker stated they would hear
the next two cases together.
Request of F. Wayne Martin for
preliminary plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block
4, Londonderry Addition (previously
submitted as Lots 1 & 2, Block 1,
Martin-Withers Addition).
Request of F. Wayne Martin for final
plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 4,
Londonderry Addition (previously
submitted as Lots 1 & 2, Block 1,
Martin-Withers Addition).
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
. . -.
Page 3
p & Z Minutes
September 13, 1984
~
PS 84-101
APPROVED
PS 84-102
APPROVED
6. PZ 84-60
\"
Jackie Fluitt with Stembridge &
Associates came forward to represent
Mr. Martin.
Mr. Wood asked about item #8 regarding
signing a covenant for street pro
rata.
Chairman Tucker asked Mrs. Calvert if
she had Staff recommendation regarding
this.
Mrs. Calvert said she did not, but
that since that was only two lots,
they might allow them to sign a
covenant, she was not sure.
Mr. Wood asked about fire coverage.
Mr. Fluitt said Mr. Riddle had
suggested they put a building line on
the back so no structure could be
built in the area not covered.
Chairman Tucker said that would be
sufficient.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 84-101 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 84-102 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
MS. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of J. D. Scott with Sc
Burton to rezone Lot c M,
Smithfield on, from its present
cl cation of AG (Agriculture) to
-2 (Commercial). This property is
located on the north side of Main
Street and bounded on the north by
Amundson Drive (8209 Main Street).
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
r
r-
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
September 10, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: Lots 1 & 2, Block 4, LONDON-
DERRY ADDN., Subm. as MARTIN-
WITHERS ADDN., PREL. AND FINAL
PLAT, PS 84- 101 & 102.
In response to Know1ton-Eng1ish-Flowers letter dated September
2, 1984, we offer the following response:
1. As requested, the subdivision name has been changed.
2. The Surveyor's Seal of Registration now shows clearly on
the Final ,Plat.
3. The appropriate endorsement blocks now appear on the Final
Plat.
4. The existing zoning has been added to the Final Plat.
5. A vicinity map has been added to the Final Plat.
6. All contiguous platting and/or ownership has been shown on
the Final Plat.
7. No additional easements have been requested as of this date.
8. In lieu of escrowing his prorata shar~ of future street
improvements, the owner would prefer to sign a letter covenant
agreeing to pay his share at the time such improvements are
made.
9. Although the SOQ-foot radius ~oes not cover all of lots 1 &
2, the radius more than covers the area for the proposed
residential houses on each of these lots.
10. The owner agrees to pay his prorata share of the existing 6-inch
water line in Douglas Lane.
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
II
(~
~
I
I
Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 4
LONDONDERRY ADDN.
Page 2
Prel. & Final Plat
11. Percolation tests have been completed on both of these lots.
The results have been.furnished to the County Health Department
for their review and approval of the septic tank sewer system
is expected soon.
If there should be any further questions regarding these lots,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
DRS/et
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director or Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
I,
I
I
I September 2, 1984
I Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
I North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
I
I We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following
conments:
I 1
14IÞ The Surveyor's Seal of Registration is not clearly visible on the plat.
I 3 The Zoning Commission Endorsement block and Council Approval block should be
revised to comply with the format presented in the Subdivision Ordinance on the
final plat.
I 4
I 5 A small scale vicinity map should be included on the Final Plat showing the
general location of the development.
II 6 All contiguous platting and/or ownership should be shown on the Final Plat.
7
I 8
¡I
I
Ie
I
r:
('
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
RE: 3-851. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
LONDONDERRY ADDITION,
Subm. as MARTIN-WITHERS ADDN.,
PREL. AND FINAL PLAT,
PS 84,- 101 5 102, GRID MAP 40
We would recommend that the name of this proposed subdivision be changed from the
Martin-Withers Addition to the Londonderry Addition since this development is in
the vicinity of the Londonderry Addition. Also the lot and block number should be
changed accordingly.
The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Final Plat.
Utility companies should be contacted to determine if any easements are required
to serve this lot.
The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street
improvements on Douglas lane or construct any required paving improvements along
the frontage of his property at this time.
9
The existing fire hydrant located in Douglas Lane does not provide full coverage
of the proposed platted area based on a 50D-foot radius.
September 2, 1984 PS 84 - 101 & 102 PAGE
!SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 · 817/283-8211 · METRO/2e7-3387
1
I·
f
('
r
I Subdivision Review Letter continued
LONDONDERRY ADDITION
Ie
I
111
II Please call if you have any questions.
~W,~
I RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
10
The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing 6-inch water
line in Douglas Lane. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for
one-half of the existing line for a total length of 194.42 feet.
Plans for septic tank sewer system should be submitted to the County Health
Department for review and approval, and the results of percolation tests should be
furnished to the City before this development is approved.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
I September 2, 1984
PS 84 - 101 & 102
PAGE
2
I
, 6--.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE:
9/24/84
I~
SUBJECT:
Appeal Hearing - PZ 84-72
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKCROUND: If the Council grants Appeal Hearing, the hearinq can be heard
October 22, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION lIQUIkED:
Approve, Disapprove Appeal Hearing
IUDCETED lTOt:
YES
N/A
110 N/A
I
~ þ
I
Ie
I
I
I
September 14, 1984
I
I
Rodger Line
City Manager
City of North Rich1and Hills
I
Re: PZ 84-72
Special Usè Permit
Ie
I
I
Dear Mr. Line:
I would like to request an Appeal Hearing on the above
referenced zoning request. I wish to sell alcoholic
beverages with Chinese Food on Rufe Snow next to McDonald's.
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied my request on
September 13th.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
I
Sincerely,
.~
-" ,,-ø
- j.J2~ (;bet ('
Aeou Hock Lin
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
(
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
,
DATE:
9/24/84
/:3
-..
SUBJECT:
Appeal Hearing - PZ 84-61
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: If the Council grants Appeal Hearing, the hearing can be heard
October 22, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION lIQUIRED:
l1rra~' H~drinQ
ApDrove.
Di ~~~ppr(""\'uA
tUDCETED 1TOt:
YES N/A
N/A
110
I
I
t¡;
Charles Owen Companies, Inc.
_ 1200 COPELAND ROAD, SUITE 400, ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011, (817) 274·1200, METRO 265-4000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1_
I
CHARlES OWEN COMPANIES, INo.
September 14, 1984
Mr. Roger Line, City Manager
North Richland Hills City Hall
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Zoning Case PZ-84-61, Request for Change
to C-2 Commercial on a 6.8 acre tract of
land on Davis Blvd. at Ross Road,
Charles Owen Companies, Inc.
Dear Roger:
The zoning request for the case referenced above was rejected on a vote
of 3-2 by the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 13th. We
were totally surprised and shocked at the denial of C-2 zoning on this
tract, since there was only one very passive citizen objection as
opposed to three very positive citizens speaking for the zoning.
We respectfully request an appeal hearing for this case at the earliest
possible date. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
~~~ r---
-charles L. Owen ~
CLO/dea
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE:
Ii
9/24/84
SUBJECT:
Variance to Siqn Ordinance
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: THIS IS A REHEARING OF A REOUEST THAT WAS HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 10th.
1984 FOR A VARIANCE TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE.
Mr. Leach and Mr. Loudon reauest a variance from the sian Ordinance.
A billboard is proposed to be located at 7659 Northeast LOQ9 820 at the corner
of Nancy Lane and the access road (see attached letter). At the first hearinq
the staff erroneously stated that it was within 500 feet of an existing bill-
board. This provision of the ordinance does not aDDlv in this case. However.
the billboard is within 100 feet of a residential district and the staff
recommends denial of this reauest.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Den;ñl
nf Vñr;~n~A rrnm rnø ~;~n O~ð;n~n~~
BUDGETED ITEM: YES N In. NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
N In.
.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
August 23. 1984
City Council of
North Richland Hills
Dear Councilmembers.
, .
This letter is tn regards to the billboard to be placed on the property
at 7659 N. E. Loop 820. I am a homeowner at 4704 Susan Lee Ln. I have
been contacted by Richard A. Leach and Tracy L. Loudon concerning
this billboard and have no objections to 1ts~e 'n~he property
at 7659 N. E. Loop 820. ~/ j ~
~~
Tim S msill
. à~'f6n!me, personally appeared 0;'" 512 A1'f1..// ,this 1 <¡fA
I 1 /~' ...
day of /, t~ 3 ¡J¡I _ r , 1984.
II,,¡.:¿.-..;~;/a~ ' Notary Public, Tarrant County, Texas.
cY COß1mlssion expires / d - ( - 2 ~
,I
I
Ie
I Ci ty Council of
North Richland Hills
I Re: variance to Sign Ordinance
I
I
I
I
August 29, 1984
Dear eounci1Jœnbers,
We, the \mdersigned, hereby request to be placed on tl1e Sep't:eItœr 10, 1984
Ci. ty Council agenda for a variance fran the sign ordinance pertaining to
billboards. OUr property is located at 7659 N. E. I.Dop 820, cxm1er of Nancy
Lane am access road I.Dop 820. Billboard to be placed on property is single
pole, do\Dle faced, 14 feet by 48 feet, exterior lighted. Plaœnent of
billboard on property is in c:x:q>1iance with all requirerœnts except distance
fran single family property line. Both property owners within affected
distance have been ex>ntacted. Ietters fran each are attached ~tifying
they have no objections to the billboard. Both property a.-mers are behind
our property and face away from IDop 820. We feel this warrants a variance
fran the sign ordinance.
.JI We hereby request a penn:it to place a billboard on our property located at
1I4IÞ 7659 N. E. I.Dop 820.
Respectfully subni tted,
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
,'tf
I
4/ //:7~J~
Rièhard A. Ie
·1
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
re
I
August 23, 1984
City Council of
North Richland Hills
Dear Councilmembers,
This letter is in regards to the billboard to be placed on the property
at 7659 N. E. Loop 820. I am a homeowner at 4705 Nancy Ln. I have
been contacted by Richard A. Leach and Tracy L. Loudon concerning
this billboard and have no objections to its placement on the property
at 7659 N. E. Loop 820.
(2g~~¿~ß&);;~ ~)
A. Jewel G rner -
,!/BE'~OI;e me, personallyappeared-LJ J~I{'P/ tC.lffiJJ£:~· , this .:J....<?h.....
day'df .A J.L~ ¡. t'.,L , 1984.
(1J~l ,ß¡h ' Notary Public, Tarrant County, Texas.
Commission expires J);; - -Š" ~ ç
1-
_UBJECT:
I
DEPARTMENT:
I BACKGROUND:
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
DATE:
9-19-84
r-
/~
First Baptist Church, Haltom City (Re: Sewer Tap)
Utility
The First Baptist Church of Haltom City, 5825 Whitley Road has requested
to tie into the sewer line south of Whitley Road in the City of Watauga.
The City of Haltom City cannot serve this tract because no sewer line
is available.
The church has agreed to pay their pro rata share of existing sewer
line and sewer tap if you approve their request.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove request of First Baptist Church of
J-C ·
t~ to tie into sewer main.
BUDGETED lTOt:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
N/A
_0
x
/1Þ~fL/ bf¿ ~
I.
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
DATE:
9/24/84
J~
SUBJECT:
Police Software Contract
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: The Council approved hardware and software purchases for the
computerization of the Police Department on November 14. 1983.
Several "off the shelf" pr02rams for specialized police operations
were evaluated and found to be both extremely expensive and mar2inally suitable
for our Ðurposes. From AU2ust '83 throu2h January 1984 several meetin2s were held
with mana2ement personnel from North Richland Hills. Grapevine. Euless. as cities
with like needs, and Multi Information Systems, Inc. (MISI), and Municipal
Software Consultants, Inc., for the purpose of formalizin2 the relationship
between concerned parties.
The primary purpose of the Users Group was (1) develop a customized
police packa2e suitable for mid-size cities: (2) utilize existin2 data currently
in the micro-system in the Police Department (Incoterm): (3) share development
costs between cities and consultants: and finally (4) use two consultin2 firms
whose pr02rams have been found reliable and whose service has been 200d.
Once the Users Group was officially formed. ne2otiations on the
content of the Police Packa2e were continued for several months with police and
finance personnel from the three cities and a cost sharin2 a2reement was reached.
Our initial contract called for three (3) Dhases of imDlementin2 the police
system. The total cost for each DarticiDatin2 city was set at $15.000. In the
initial contract each DarticiDatin2 city was to receive a 7% royalty on any future
sales of the Dr02ram. We now have a substitute contract.
This new contract is a result of ne2otiations between MISI and the
Cities of Snyder. LaMarQue. and Bedford. These cities have contracted for an
enhanced Computer-Assisted Dispatch (CAD) system and for an interfacin2 of the IBM
System with the state and federal Law Enforcement Telecommunications Networks.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
DATE:
9/24/84
The new agreement calls for no additional funding from the initial
three cities and, upon completion of the development the two packages will be
combined. This combined effort provides all six cities with a complete Law
Enforcement Package and greatly enhances the marketability of the system. Royalty
from the total system will, however, be reduces to 3~% per city on any future
sales. The end result of this cooperative effort is that each of the six cities
will benefit from a $90,000 system while only paying one-sixth of the cost
($15,000).
Currently, both vendors and the five other cities have signed a
contract agreeing to this revision. It appears to be in the best interest of the
City to participate in this substitute contract. We recommend approval.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Software.
Authorize City Manager to sign contract for Police
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
'I
. . 'f'\' "
II )
_ Where~5, MISI hereby agrees to program the software defined in
appendix A to the IBM System 34/36 for the accepted fee structure as
4I5pecified in the following, as full compensation as specified.
I I. ~£2g~__2f__~~~~i£~~ MISI shall write the application software
on the IBM System 34/36 Computer System 50 as to enable the
Police Users Group to perform data processing, police
dispatching and reporting activities as outlined in Appendix A,
attached to this Agreement.
I
I
I
I
I
I
ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
--
I
I I I.
I I.
APPLICATION SOFTWARE - RIGHTS AND DOCUMENTATION
. .~
MISI shall provide suffi~ient program documentation
of the following:
consisting
A.
'"
File layouts to include record length, field
description, starting position, .ending position.
name,
B.
Technical documentation
appl i~at ion.
to
in~lude
books
of
run
each
c.
Narrative outline of each application.
D.
User documentation to include .pecifi~ instructions per
menu item included in.ea~h application.
Application software as described in this contract converted to
the System/34, System/36 mode was designed spe~ifically for the
Police Users Group and ownership shall be retained by MISI.
1.
The Police User's group shall receive 21~ royalty fee from
ea~h sale. Royalty fees to be split equally between the
three (3) entities.
2.
MISI sh~ll receive the remalnlng balan~e after
Users Group's royalty is paid.
the
Police
3.
All royalties paid shall exclude
conversion services as supplied .by
sub-contractors.
implementation and
MISI or MISI's
LIABILITY & CONTRACTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES
MISI agrees to hold, save, and indemnify the Police Users Group
free, clear and harmless of, f~om, and against any and all
liability including, but not limited to, court costs, attorney
fees, and investigation expenses which may arise out of or
result from MISI agreements entered into by MIS! and/or
separate entities, clients, competitors, or colleagues.
25c
. .~..
'1 " ' .. \ ...... "
. .
--I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
)1
--
I
MIS I shall be solely responsible for the negotiations,
execution, and performance of any ag~eement entered into by
MISl with potential clients. MIS I shall be responsible for
~ontract specifications, collections due MISI, or the
enforcement of any provisions as outlined in that contra~t
against such potential clients. In no event shall the Police
Users Group have any obligation pursuant to the MIS I license
agreement to maintain, support, or remedy any error in the
Application Software described in this Contract.
IV. TERMS OF CONTRACT AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
This Agreement is for a term of five (5) years, with options
for the Poli~e Users Group and MISI to extend this marketing
arrangement for a period of two (2) additional years. The
Police Users Group will not register or make application for
any patent, copyright, or reserving in the Police Users Group's
or any other party's name any information, data, or system
furnished by MISI -hereunder. The Police Users Group shall
safeguard all copies of the Application Software against
unauthorized disclosure And take su¿h steps as are neces6ary to
insure that the 'provisions of this AgreeMent are not violated
by any employee or Agent of the City. This Contract may not be
assigned, but the benefits of this Contract shall be deemed
extended to those separate entities with which
Multi-Information Systems, Incorporated has interfirm, nominee,
or ~.pr.s.ftt.tion .gr....nt. or Nhi~h compris. the MISI
organízat ion.
Termination of this ~ontra~t prior to expiration of its
duration must be by mutual ~onsent of all entities.
MISI shall report all sales of the Rpplication Software to the
Police Users Group. MISI shall furnish the Police Users Group
an itemized' list of all ApplicatioYI Software sales for each
fiscal year of MISI. Remittance of royalty fees shall be made
quarterly. MISI's fiscal year shall be January 1 to December
31.
v. MISCELLANEOUS
Multi-Information System, In~., the Cities of Bedford, LeMarque
and Snyder Are independent contractors. _ Neither shall Act as
agent of the other and neither has the authority to make any
representations to enter into any agreements as to bind or
obligate the other.
Nothing herein is intended to establish a partnership or Joint
venture of any sort between the parties hereto.
25d
',' '~. ,.
"I. I :
,
This Agreement ~onstitutes the entire agreement between the
partie. relating to the subJect matter herein.
Ie
I CITY OF BEDFORD
I :; -_ÜøutÚ,-~________
~~ - ------
I
0,
Ie__~~_
I TITLE -Ç..1.t,,_m ...". ~LL.
---...~---
I ATTEST : <' \'1,
------ ,
, .
I ' \, II /1/1
-_-:J~_~_~____
,_~~TE__~~~~_j9j(~_______
. \ .. ). '
II ): , II
I
I
--
I
MULTI-INFORMATION SV TEMS, INC.
CITY OF SNYDER
. BY --~~J!..º~_~____
TITLE _~~__~/~
ATTEST
~~~~~~_g-~11~~_--_---_
DATE___~l~_!J~~~___________
25e
'Ie ·
I
APPENDIX A
I
I
I
I
I
J
4IÞ COMPUTER ASSISTED DISPATCHING
I The CAD System will allow the dispatchers or telephone clerks to receive
info~~Mation froM the citizen pertaining to requests for Police Service.
This information will be keyed into the computer through a video terminal.
The computer will check the request for a valid signal code and address.
Upon acceptance the computer will assign the next sequential Service #, the
date, the time call was received, ~~ecommend what unit(s) shc,uld answer the
call and if one man or two man uy.its will be needed. T,e computer will also
assign the District (Beat) and Grid (Reporting Area) to the call record and
also check the Grid for any Hazardous Addresses in the at~ea. This
information will be sent to the dispatcher for his handling. Information.
will continually be sent to the compute~ file until the officer is cleared
from the call. At this time all of the call information will be in the file
arid the need for a IICall Card II elin,iy.ated.
This is only a brief summary and complete design details will be done as
a corporate effort of the three cities and possibly all six cities as
defined in Appendix B.
TCIC/NCIC STATE INTERFACE
This program will allow Entry, Modification and Search of the TCIC/NCIC file
from any terminal authorized by the user agency through the
~re..nt lee 40+ line.
COOPERATIVE EFFORT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
Three other cities, Grapevine, Euless and North Richland Hills a~e presently
funding the conversion of our Computerized Management Information System to
the IBM 34/36. When their efforts and OUt~S are complete we plan to merge
both conve~sions into one complete Law Enforcement Packa~e for small to
medium sized aQencies.
The details of how this effort will affect eac~ city is outlined in Appendix
B.
25£
I
./
. APPENDI X B
.. e Deve1 o DrneYlt and Re'yal ty
I The MIS conversion will be supported by the cities of Grapevine, Euless
North Richland Hills with each city funding $15,000.00 of the proJect.
I
I
a rid
The Computer Assisted Dispatching and the TCIC/NCIC Interface will be
supported by the cities of Bedford, LeMarque and Snyder with each city
funding $15,000.00 of the proJect.
Ity
At the t irl1e
module each
conversions
Ey,f orcer.1er.t
of
the software sales,
cackage is sold.
of conception each city was to share 7~ of their particuliar
time the software was sold. However, we now propose that both
be me~ged into a complete Law
Package and that each of the six (6) cities receive 3 1/2 ~ rOyë
I
I
I
whether only a portion of the system or the entire
We also propose that during the conversion that all si~ cities, along with
MISI and MSCI,
be present at all meetings for defining and testing the entire system.
In summary this means that:
1. All six cities will receive a complete Law Enforcement Package for
$15000.00 each, plus any additional training required.
Ie 2. Each city "ill receive 3 1/2~ of each sale of funded software.
3. The length of the contract wou~d be for five (5) years with an
.xtension of anoth.r two (2) years if all parties agree.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
CITY OF BEDFORD
æ~_______
ú7'
MULTI-I~FORMATION ~TEMS, INC.
By~¿l2fj-'t!¿=~T----
TITLE_~ž¿¿{~~______________
TI
eII~§!
_12
DATE_~~4Æ~_____
.
25g
r'
I
4IfTY OF L~ARQUE
I BY __~~
I TITLE -~~j1l.~~--------
I eIIg~n ~ c:f ¿d1.~
I
------
I º8I~__~~~~T-J9J[4_______
I CITY OF GRAPEVINE
I BY ____Ç)~_~_~_____
I..i.lITLE FIIJAIJU p,££OTdI'(.
~ ------------------------
I
I
I
I
I BY
I
I
8II~§I
--¿4~\;~-~~~~~A:lhi:~~______
,-. 1 I
< ..¡.- c.'l ~
DATE__':.J£_~Jc:LuJ¿..£~tzT.LLf '
/
TITLE
8II~§I
,/-j
fA L':1. ' r'\ þ ,
/ ). . '. ~ .' " "
" ( - -,'- L(
_...._~LL r-- - - - _.- _J -'.- ---. T~ - - -----
I .' , .-
, " I .-
DATE.' J' '. 1,-"\ /1 ../ ~ L7/
- ~ L ( (,; L (.. .'" . /, ,/ (
:<1
I
CITY OF SNYDER
BY_____~~~______
TITLE ::ø~~--~-r.rh~
8rrg§! ''1_.,,- ~~·t---'·~·"..1/):I\
"
DATE ,~ w -?__ ~ ,1)- l , ) ), ,}-'
---~-------~---~----------~
MUN Ie I'PAL SOFTW8,~ ÇONSUL TANTS, INC.
/ ,.,
BY__~~~~~-----:---
TITLE_~~-~----------
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BY
------------------------------
TITLE
--------------------~-----
8II~ªI
~-~-------------~-------------~-
______º8I~
Ø')C'ï
I
I
e SUBJECT:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
-- BUDGETED ITEM:
I ACCOUNT NUMBER:
DATE:
September
/7
24 t 1984
Camera Equipment for City Cable
DEPARTMENT: Purchasing
BACKGROUND: On Wednesday, September 12, 1984 at 10:00 A.M. bids were opened for the
above mentioned equipment and are outlined below. (8 Bid specifications were mailedt
and 4 returned.)
Vendor
Texas Video Systems
Victor Duncan, Inc.
Siboney Communications
ECl/Video
Exceptions
5
o
o 27.838.00 Less 1%
1
Amount
$31.381.83
29..164.00
27..559.96
27.423.29
Texas Video System no bid items 113.4.5. and 13.. ECI/Video has Stlh~t"it11t"pn
on item 11 offering a Harris 550TBC in Dlace of Microtime T-120 ~~ ~pprif;pn
Staff feels the Microtime T-120 is by far the superiòr equipment as detailed 'in'
our specifications. Combined with the superior repair facility at Sibonev
Communications and the Harris 550 TBC not meeting specifications. makes Siboney
low bidder meeting specifications. ( Cost differential is $136.67 )
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove the purchase of Camera
equipment in the amount of $27,838.00 less 1% ($27,559.96) from Siboney
Communications.
YES X NO
01-99-01-5970
I
I
Ie
I
I I.
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
non consideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which non consideration is properly requested may be returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2.
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Rich1and Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3.
IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
4.
REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are sdbject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced value of any items.
(d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
I
I 5.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie 7.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of adåitional work
if awarded.
6.
AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
ASSIGNMENT
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Mariager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8.
NOTICE OF DELAYS
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely perfo~nce (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9.
BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand .name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
I
I
Ie
I
I
1
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
Ie
I
(a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
I'
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
!I
I·
re
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASE
1.
Delivery shall be to the location identified on th~ purchase order within
the City of North Richland Hills.
2.
The contract will be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications at
the price bid.
3.
In the event of partial shipments or multiple deliveries, the quantities
shown on the bid are estimated quantities only. The City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to purchase more than or less than the
quantities shown. In any event, the unit bid prices shall govern.
4.
Bidder warrants that all deliveries made under the contract will be of the
type and quality specified; and the City of North Richland Hills
Purchasing Agent may reject and/or refuse any delivery which falls below
the quality specified in the specifications. The City of North Richland
Hills shall not be held to have accepted any delivery until after an
inspection of same has been made and an opportunity to exercise its right
of rejection has been afforded.
All manufacturers' warranties shall inure to the benefit of the City of
North Richland Hills, and replacement of'defective materials shall be made
promptly upon request. ·
6.
Failure by the contractor to make reasonable delivery as and when requested
shall entitle the Purchasing Agent to acquire quantities from alterna~e
sources wherever available, with the right to seek reimbursement from the
contractor for amounts, if any, paid by the City of North Richland Hills
over and above the bid price.
7.
All materials delivered shall be free of any and all liens and shall upon
acceptance thereof become the property of the City of North Richland Hills
free and clear of any materialman""s, supplier's, or other type liens.
8.
Regardless of the award of a contract hereunder, the City of North Richland
Hills retains the right to purchase the same or similar materials or items
from other sources should it be determined that doing so would be in the
City's best interest, based on cost and quality considerations; however, in
such event, the contractor will be given the first option of meeting or
rejecting the proposed alternate source's lower price or higher quality.
9.
Acceptance by the City of North Richland Hills of any delivery shall not
relieve the contractor of any guarantee or warranty, express or implied,
nor shall it be considered an acceptance of material not in accordance with
the specifications thereby waiving the City's right to request replacement
of defective material.
I'
II The undersigned here by offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills.
.n the ,te~ms and conditions contained in this proposal. the general conditions
I nd the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further
certify that our attached proposal submitted by .5jE~;,),Jt.,y Co/t~(t1. \~ .)(~'.
complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North R;chland's
I bid specification, be it further specified that any non compliance with the .
City of North Richland Hills specifications is to be outlined in detail stating
. said vendors ~-::~t)µ'èY {.ok~1 ~::rJJ( . exceptions.
And further understánd that t e City of North Richland Hills acceptance ·
II of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
I all proposals, or any part there of.
I
II
I
Ie
I THIS MUST BE SU3MITED WITH VENOOR QUOTATION.
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I· · I - · "-
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
lItlf the "Metmplex NOR TH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: ~
I Request For: Camera and Editing Equipment
Siboney Communications, Inc. Bid Opening Date: September 12, 1984 At 10:00 A.M.
P.o. Box 165328
I Irving, TX 75062 Date:
Requisition No.
Sealed bids wi II be received unti I 10:00 A.M. September 12,1984
I City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: John Whitney Phone: 281-0041
TEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
. JVC BYU 110 Up Cameras/lOX Servo Zoom Lens. 2 Each 3255.00 6510.00
II Camera Head, 1" View Finder and Carring Case
2 JVC AAC-llU Adapter/Battery Charge for BYU110 2 Each 190.00 380.00
CJ Si2ma PS-50l Svstem 500 Power Supplv , R;:i~h 118.00 118.00
Sigma FR-500 Module Mounting Frame 1 Each 315. nn 3]~ on
5 Sigma EX-505 Extender Card for System 500 1 Each 24.00 24.00
J SiQma BBG-550 Adíustab1e B1RCk Rtlr~t Mnn111p 2 Each 290.00 580.00
Davis and Sanford FM-25 D&S 100% Fluid Heads 2 Each 149.00 298.00
~ Davis and Sanford Mark II Gear Elevating TriPod 2 Each 172.00 344.00
~~ Davis and Sanford W-4 Dolly with 5" Wheels 2 Each 64.00 128.00
Vf-400 U View fi.nder for BY-110 UD 2 Each 388.00 776.00
LII Microtime T-120 Heterodvne Digital Time 1 Each 6430.00 6430.00
Base Corrector
¡: Hitachi v-059B 3.5" Waveform Monitor 1 Each 1100.00 1100.00
w1th Portable Osc1111scope AD 058 B
-
IJ Installation and 4 Hours Training 1 Job 360.00 360.00
'Sony Va 5850 Recorder/ Player/Editor 1 Each :.0,475.00 10,475.00
~ ~onv RM-440 ~ m;-t ir Frlit;np C 1 1 RR~h INC.
VDC-5 Dubbing Cable 1 Each INC.
RCC-SF 33- Pin Cable 2 Each INC.
1H.. ~nnv VO-c)ROO 'R_ ~- / P'~vpr/F~~~p- ] F~rh INC.
. ., .,
1(~ Number of Days For Delivery ARO 30 davs
~ Warranty Offered 1 year parts/90 davs labc r
Installation Of Items 1-12 To Be Preformed
By S~boney Communicat1ons, INC.
'- Training To Be Preformed Bv 2.7. S-51."
Siboney Communications, Inc. SUB-TOTAL 27,838.00
ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 27,838.00
Þls 1 % 10 DAYS, F.O,B, CITY OF NORTH
II LAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 30 DAYS FROM
~ECE IPT OF ORDER. The City of North Rlchland Hills Purchas-
nl!eserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formall-
i award purchases on an individual Item basIs when in Its
e Interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
:D FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
'1TH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS.
IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR·
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH-
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI·
TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT.
COMPANY: n_ª-iboney Communicati.QnS, _Inc.
BY: _-.Jam.e..5-~.~cGowan __._.__.__ ..
PHONE NUM,\R: ,METRO 256-2589__ _
SIGNATURE: O~( ~}~ '(,~'I" DATE: Slefä\_lO
THIS IS NC)T A PUHCHl\SE ORDER
I·
I
,~
./ ':,
DATE:
9-12-84
r
_BJEtT:
1
Street Seal Coating Program
1 DEPARTMENT:
BACKCROUND:
1
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
1
I
I
II CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve the appropriation of $65,000 from the
Contingency Account for street seal coating.
I"
Public Works
As indicated in the attached memorandum, severe weather conditions
last winter and this summer have caused serious deterioration pf many
residential streets.
Unless corrective action is taken before next
winter, additional damage will probably occur to the extent that costly
rebuilding of the streets might become necessary.
Funds are available in the City Council's 1983-84 budget
contingency account to finance this project.
BUDCETED 17DS:
I ACCOUNT NUHlER:
YES
10
x
Contingency Fund
I,
I
Ie
I
I>
I
1
I
I
.
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
9-11-84]
TO
Rodger N. Line. City Manager Äi. rTE
Gene Riddle. Director Public Works SUBJECT
Fog Sealing Program
FROM
REF: PWM- 0039-84
I would like to request that $65.000 be appropriated from the Contingency Fund to
fog seal some streets that 1 feel need immediate attention.
As you know, we did not plan on any sealcoating programs this year because we
were ordering a new distributor in the 1984-85 budget. We had plan on öoing the
sealing with our own maintenance crews after we received the new distributor.
Since we had such a harsh winter and we are having such a dry summer, I do not
feel that some of the streets can make it through another winter without completely
coming apart. I have attached a list of the streets that I would recommend
the fog sealing be applied and showing the amount of lineal footage on that
street. The total length of the streets listed is approximately 8 miles.
I estimate that we can do between 9 and 10 miles of street for $65,000 with
competitive bidding.
I would also like to point out that fog sealing is a new process here in the
City and basically it is the same as our regular seal coating except we do not
use the gravel cover after the asphalt oil is sprayed on the street. This is
a quicker process and more economical than the old process.
After the bids are in we will add some other streets that are not on this list
if they can be funded within this $65,000.
I' ·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
FOG SEAL
Footage
RICHLAND HILLS WEST ADDITION
Onyx Dr. N.
Dawn
Venice
Blende
Jannie
Bonzer
Dawn to Rufe Snow
Onyx N. to Onyx S.
Onyx N. to Onyx s.
Onyx S. to Jerrell
Charles to Rufe Snow
Onyx S. to Jerrell
2600
1600
1600
650
950
800
8200
RICHAVEN & RICHLAND OAKS
Grove
Laura
Lazy Ln.
Wyoming
Nevada
India
Hwy 26 to Bedford Rd.
Ash, to Colorado
Ash to Colorado
Hwy 26 to Bedford Rd.
Bedford Eu1ess to Jerri Jo
Colorado to Nevada
1200
1450
1275
1850
1650
600
8025
CLEARVIEW ADDITION
Bob
Colorado to Harwood
1050
COLLEGE HILLS
Whitfield
College Cir.
Price
Abbott
Johnson Ave.
Johnson Ct.
Holiday to Deaver
Ross to Bogart
Terry to Watauga
College to Watauga
Abbott to Price
All
1050
1450
, '1750
1275
325
375
6225
FOSTER VILLAGE
Green Acres
Green Dale Ct.
Shady Dale Ct.
Crosstimber
Rufe Snow to Crosstimber
All
All
Starnes to Fair Meadow
1350
825
425
900
3500
BRIARWOOD
Briarwood Post Oak to Briardale 700
Briar Cliff Ct. All 550
Noneman Post Oak to Smithfield 1525
Briardale Hewitt to Briarridge 1900
Sweetbriar All 575
5250
'I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
Cox
Cross
Chat am
Harwick
Winchester
Oldham
Buckingham
Little Ranch
Sudbury
SMITHFIELD ESTATES
Cross to Turner
Payte to Davis
NORTH PARK ESTATES
Yarmouth to Buckingham
Yarmouth to Winchester
Yarmouth to Buckingham
Yarmouth to Buckingham
Watauga to Oldham
Watauga to Sandhurst
Dorchester to End
TOTAL
700
1100
1800
1050
1075
1175
, 1275
1175
1200
· 1450
8400
42450 feet
8 miles
127,350 sq. yds
.'''Ii
."
, ........... . ..- ~ ~.
v ' r I .........-......__. .._
1 ..
'1-
I_UBJECT:
/ (
r
DATI:
9-19-84
Oversizing Water Mains for Summer Hills Addition - Watauga
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I DEPARTKENT: Utility
BACKGROUND: This subdivision is located north of Watauga Heights East, south of
Foster Village and West of Rufe Snow. The reason for the long delay in awarding
the bids is the developer was waiting for the City of North Richland Hills to
release the contract due to the overloaded sewer line. I checked these bids and
found that W. A. Harrison's bids was the lowest for the city's participation.
The City's share of the water lines is $60,886.00 (the difference between
an 8" ,main required for the subdivision and a 16 main as required by our masterplan).
I CIn COUNCIL ACTION IlEQUIJlED: Approve/disapprove the bid for water oversizing for
~ Summer Hills Addition - Watauga.
I
I IUÐCETED ITDI:
ACCOUNT "UHlER:
YES
x 10
02-11-01-6700
J!i/JU~ ¿;/fA) ~
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
r
~
Dale Riley and Associates
3900 Acapulco Irving, Texas 75062 (214) 255- 2154
September 19, 1984
Mayor Dan Echols
Members of the City Council
City of North Richland Hills
Re: Summer Hills Addition
Watauga, Texas
Developed by OTX, Inc.
Gentlemen,
Thank you for considering the release of the work orders
for the subject property. Due to the delay of the last year
we are very anxious to start this project. We feel that our
work will parallel the off site sewer work being done by the
City of North Richland Hills and that we will finish about
the same time. However should there be any question regarding
use of the sewer, we agree that no homes will be occupied
until the outfall portion is completeQ.
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
,.
o T X, I NC.
3900 ACAPULCO
IRVING, TEXAS 75062
256-2372
Mr. Gene Riddle
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Reque~ted City Participation
Summer Hills Addition - within the
City of Watauga for the City of
North Richland Hills - Oversize Water Mains
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the city participation we are requesting
as prepared by our engineer, Owen D. Long, for the oversize water mains
within and adjacent to the Summer Hills Addition. Our bids were taken on
February 20, 1984 at your City Hall.
As shown on the participation breakdown, the oversize water is the
difference between a 16" main and an 8" main for an amount of $60,886.00.
Please review our request and forward it to the City Council for their
consideration and approval. If you have any questions, please give me
a call.
We appreciate your consideration.
ISi nc{;~\~((I·
, ,;t If ( (
. l,
l ,.., ~
Dale Riley, V. P.
OTX, I NC ~
.' "rr...
ODL/ml
encl.
I ','
~
I
re
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~
, .
Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
September 17, 1984
REQUESTED PARTICIPATION - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
PROJECT: SUMMER HILLS ADDITION (WATAUGA)
(Using W. A. Harrison's Bid - Bids Taken 2-20-84)
OWNER:
OTX, INC. - DALE RILEY, Vo Po
OVERSIZE WATER MAINS
2820 L.F.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 8" and 1611
3 Each
1 Each
2.72 Tons
75 L.F.
1 Each
1 Each
1 Each
Main @ $14.25 per LoF. ---------------- $ 40,185.00
Gate Valve @ $3,605000 Each ----------- 10,815.00
Tapping Saddle @ $750øOO Each ---------- 750.00
Fittings @ $1,925.00 per Ton ----------- 5,236.00
Street Bore @ $10.00 per L.F. ----------- 750.00
6" Blow-Off @ $1,375.00 Each ------------ 1,375.00
41 Dia. Sump Manhole @ $725.00 Each ---- 725000
111 Air Release Valve @ $1,050.00 Each---- $ 1,050.00
TOTAL OVERSIZE WATER ------------------ $60,886000
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone (817) 281-8121
I
I-
. _SUBJECT:
I
_~ r:-
r;'~ t' ../
DATI:
9-19-84
Over sizing Water Mains for Foster V~llage, Section 17 Watauga
1
DEPARTMENT: Utility
BACKCROUND: This section of Foster Village is located on the corner of Whitley Road
and Bursey Road. The reason for the delay in awarding the bids is the developer
was waiting for the City of North Richland Hills to release the contract due to the.
overloaded sewer lines. I checked these bids and found that Huffman Construction's
I
I
I
-I
bid was the lowest for the city's participation.
The city's share of the water lines is $36,260.40 (the difference between an
8" ma.in required for this subdivision and a 12" main and a 16" main as required
by our m~sterplan).
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the bid for water mains oversizing
for Foste.r Village Section 17 - Watauga.
BUDCETED lTDI:
ACCOUNT tfUKBEI:
YD X 110
02-11-01-6700
I.
.. ,
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
.,
r
SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
901 Summit Avenue
P.O. Box 470337
Ft. Worth, Texas 76147
334-0686
Mr. Gene Riddle
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Requested City Participation
Foster Village - 17th Filing - Within the
City of Watauga for the City of North Richland
Hills - Oversize Water Mains
Dear Mro Riddle:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the city participation we are requesting
as prepared by our engineer, Owen D. Long, for the oversize water mains
adjacent to the Foster Village 17th Filing. Our bids were taken back on
August 8, 1984, at your City Hall.
As shown on the attached copies of our breakdown for participation,
the oversize water is the difference between a 16" and an 8" main
(for an amount of $22,649.50) and the difference between a 12" and
an 8" main (for an amount of $13,610.90) - making the total request
for oversize water mains of $36,260.40.
Please review our request and forward it to the City Council for their
consideration and approval. If you have any questions, please give me
a call.
We appreciate your consideration.
I.
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
r
Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
September 17, 1984
REQUESTED CITY PARTICIPATION --- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
PROJECT: FOSTER VILLAGE - 17TH FILING- WATAUGA
(BIDS TAKEN 8-8-84 - USING HUFFMAN CONSTRUCTION CO. BID)
OVERSIZE WATER MAINS
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 8" AND 16"
1150 L.F.
1 Ea.
1 Ea.
1 Eao
Main @ $16.53 per L.F. = $19,009.50
Gate Valve @ $2,790800 Eao = 2,790000
1" Air Release Valve @ $800.00 Eao = 800.00
1" Threaded Outlet @ $50.00 Ea. = $ 50000
Sub Total Oversize ----------------$22,649050
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 8" and 12"
1910 L.F.
4 Ea.
0.505 Ton
Main @ $5.99 per L. F. = $11,440090
Gate Valve @ $290.00 Ea. = 1,160000
Cast Iron Fittings @ $2,000. per Ton 1,010.00
Sub Total Oversize --------------- $13,610090
Total Oversize Water ----------------------------$ 36,260.40
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone (817) 281-8121
I.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
p, o. BOX 470337 . FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76147 . 901 SUMMIT AVENUE . (817) 334- 0686
JAMES R. HARRIS, JR.
VICE PRESIDENT
Mr. Alan Bronstad
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
Dear Alan:
September 18, 1984
We appreciate your consideration in issuing the work order for
Section 17 of Foster Village. We understand that no homes will
be allowed occupancy until the subdivision has been connected
to the new sewer main to be constructed in ~his area.
JRH:ga
Very truly yours,
r
/
/
.t" .).~ '-. - -.,. "-;:'t.' ¿ k ---:)
J?mes R. Harris, Jr.
-.1~
r-
~, I
I
.
1-
e;UIJECT:
1
DATI: 9-19-84
Installation of High Service Pump at. Conn Booster Station - - Partial Ppv
Estimate III
I DEP AJlTHENT:
BACKCROUND:
Utility
I
I
I
I
I
I,l-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Installation of high service pump at Conn Drive Booster Station a~proved
by City Council on June 11. 1984.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/dispparove contractor's partial estimate 111 to
ISI Contractors & Engineers Inc. in the amount of $17,286.00 for materials furnished
and work performed.
BUDCETED ITDe:
ACCOUNT NUKBEI:
YES
x
10
,} /Î
(!/
/D-!¿
Revenue Bonds
I·: "
, "'.-'F.''','._~'
. _~ ó
~
.
"
IW
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~,··..:.o.,;"':'·-·'~·''''''JI'-'''''''. ;~i.J':'þ1A~'·'·~~;I.._.,(_. '.'~ "","~
KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
Se~tember 12. 1984
Mr. Rodger N. lifte. City Ha...ger
C1ty of North R1ch11nd Ht11s
7301 N.E. Loop 820
*-,rth Rfeh1.nd Hills, TexIs 76118
Re:
~nclosetJ 11 one copy of Co.-tractor·s ParUal Pay [stiNte No. One (1), dAted
August 30, U84. ...de payable to 1St Contrlctors .nd Engtneet'l. Inc., in the
àUIOU"t of $17,286.00, for IUterhh furnished 1M work perforated on tile r.""-
ttl1ced project as of iltgust 30. 1984.
We nave verified the qviAt1t1es and condition of tbe work on-s1te as well as the
1te~ extensions and additions on the est1mtte.
we recOMmeftd that this PA~nt fn the .....t of $17,266.00. be made tQ ISl COq-
tractors and Engineers, Inc., It p.O. 80x 11375, Ft. ~orth. Texas 75109-0375.
&-- ~~
~(NjAHIH s. SHA~KlIN
BSS/1jc
Enc1osure.
CC: Mr. lee ~ness. Director of Finance
~. Gene R1dd1e. Director of Publlc Works """""'--
.\1t'. ;~11 en c;,-ons tad. l\s s 1 s ta"t 01 rector of Pub lie Workl~ THIS COpy FOR
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 .817/283-8211 . METRO/287-3387
~
~
,.
þ
~
I
I
I
I
I
,
f~
!5i
!!
i
.~
~'
",:'
~~-~ ., 151 CONTRACTORS
""'I':' · & ENGINEERS, INC.
P. O. Box 11375
_ FORl WORTH. TEXAS 76109-0375
I-
o City of North Richland Hills
I c/o Knowlton-English-Flowers," Inc'~-'---
550 First State Bank Building
Bedford, Texas 76021
I
TERMS
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
'.F .i :..
- .......~~~...,...~~......- '-,ft
(817) 926-9294
per contract.
DESCRIPTION
PROGRESS BILLING NO . 1
Contract Amount - Original
Change Order No. 1
Contract Amount to Date
Percent Complete - 95%
10 % Retainage
NET DUE
DATE
JOB NAME
JOB LOCATION
,--..
,: '".::> -' :
'-'
.J' '
r
.,#. ¡ø---' - ~ ..-~'""_....
- ...... - ......._,.,.....
1-1t?-lY
1020
August 30, 1984 106
--, JOB NO.
Installation of High
Service Pump
Conn Drive Booster Station
North Richland Hills,.Texas
PRICE
AMOUNT
$ 17,930 00
+ 2,288 00
$ 20,218 00
$ 19,207 00
1,921 00
$ 17,286 00
~. ÐW
I.
Ie
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
i_
,
I
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO.
1
TO:
City of North Richland Hills
c/o Knowlton-En glish-Flowers, Inc.
550 First State Bank Building
Bedford, Texas 76021
Date August 30, 1984
o 1- i µ j n ;11 Co J1 t.e é\ C t
A III 0 II n t ............................... $
17,930.00
No. or Date
Change Orders &
Extras Amount
OIle
$ 2,288.00
Net Total Change Orders
............................ $
2,288.00
Contr~ct An10unt to Date
$
20,218.00
Per CeJlt Co(nplele to Date
95
9-
o
................... $
19,207.00
Less
10
% Retainage
.... .... .... ....... ........ .....
1,921.00
Less Previous Billings
-0-
................................
Alll0l11l t Due This Billil1g
................................ $
17,286.00
SuI) I nit t e (I ß Y :
COlnpany Name
rvtailin g ^ (}tlress
City &r State
IS I Contractors & Engineers, Inc.
P. O. Box 11375, Fort Worth,' TX 76109-0375
Fort Worth, Texas
Project
Type of Work Perforlned
Conn Drive Booster Station
Installation of High Service Pump
CEl, 1-1F lCA 'r E OF 1"1 I E CON TR^ CI'OR :
1 he)-('by c\.'rtify t11;1t the \\'pl-k ]1f'rf())-1I1('d and the .nflteri;ds ~upplipd to clatf'. ;,~
5110\\'n on t ht.:) above )-t:'1)re~('"nt the ac1ual value of acC'ompJishrnent undt")J" tht- tt.·I-I1I~
oft h e C () J1 t 1- act ( rl n d a 1 ] aut 110 r i zed c h an g ~ 5 the r e to) bet \\' E' e nth e u n ò (' r ~ i µ n t:' d it 1 . d
City of North Rich1?nd Hills ' r~]étting to the rcf~rpnc('d p1-ojttÇt.
1 é\1~() cel-tify t]1;)1 pi'ynlcnts. ll~ss apl)lic-able r£'lention, have bpC'n rn;¡dt' th'-"'J~h
the pf'J-jod CO\"C'J-ed by 1))·eYious pC\)'ments recei'-f'd f}eOln th(' O\\"npr, to (1) ;dl Iny
S\11)contJ-é\ctors ;\11'<1 (2) for a)) materials and 1abor u~ed in 01- in connpction ":llh
the p~1·fol-'11:lnC'E» of thi5 Contract. I further certify] havE:' complit'd \\-jth Ff',:1t'ra1.
St;-\t-e ;\nd ]pC'~l t;.¡x 1;:\\\°5. inclûding Socia} Security ](\\,OS and lln('rllplnynH'nt (~(tlnp('n-
5 a t i () n 1 ;¡ \\0 5 ;t Jl d '\' 0 r k 111 en I 5 C 01 n pen 5 ñ t ion ) a \y 5 ins 0 far . rt sap p Ji c ;1 b ) t" t nth e p p r f () J.' Ii a J1 c e
of this Contr~ct.
F\1)-t hp1'".l1Cn·p. in C'oJ15ideJ-ation of th~ p;¡ytnents rpceivpn. an'd upon }-pceipt of t I1p
rt In 0 n ,,~ C' r l h i ~ r €' fl \1 est, the 11 n de r 5 i g n e d doe shE" r e b y \\~ a i v e. r e 1 e t\ S ~ a 11 d r ~ 1 i n q u j s h
~'1 c1:\inì or ~-l}~ht ()f 1i~n \\OhiC'h the unc1(,I·~ignE-ò mrty no\\' have upon t h~ rr~mi~("~
~l)n\of? df'~CI-i¡",,'>d p""C'ept for claims or right of He,n for contract anrl/())- ("hr¡ng~ ord('r
\\"n}-k pp,-(n'-'·1pd to p~tpnt 1h:1t r~ymf\nt i~ hf'ing rf.'t;:¡inen or \\'ill ~11h~p(1\1pn11\' hpcolnp
dtJP.
r1 ;) 1 (' : ^ U g U s t 3 0 , 1 9 H 4 Con t r act 0 r : I SIC 0 n t r act 0 Ie S & E ~ ~l~tj~~~ ~ ~ s, I n c .
S'11'~c.:)·i1H'd .\nd ~\\'nrn tn hf'fp,·e tne
I ¡i~ _s:_ d:JY of,_S:-f~ I qg ¢. . By: _D. é · ~ _
I.~' /Î c.. D. C. KCJ111CÙY
'I '\ 1- \" r.llt. ~ ie.£: ...,-L~J.J.L~~ ,,~¡1Tjl h': V i~~_fx~s.Ld_el} t_
,,,..,,..,..--,...,,.-. . , ,...."'
-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
DATE:
9/24/84
PI'I
~/élJ
SUBJECT:
Police Uniforms
DEPARTMENT: Purchasin2
BACKGROUND: Durin2 the bud2et work session in Salado the Council aDDroved. at
Chief McGlasson's reQuest. a uniform chan2e for the Police DeDartment. Bid
soecifications were written and mailed. On Seotember 17. 1984 bids were opened
and are outlined as follows:
Motor Short Long
Cycle Sleeve Sleeve
Vendor Trousers Trousers Shirt Shirt Jacket Hat ExceDtion
Donovan 45.00 125.00 40.00 45.00 67.50 19.95 0
Exception
J.B. Battle 36.50 85.00 33.50 47.50 68.95 19.95 to all terms
Ladd Uniform 30.75 38.95 25.15 29.25 61.25 19.95 " "
Factorv Sales 25.65 NIB 23.80 26.35 67.95 NIB " "
J.B. Battle~ Ladd and Factorv Sales are all offerin2 a uniform that
is inferior in Qualitv~ workmanship. design and the wear life of the uniform is
less than the reQuired 3 years.
Our soecifications were carefully researched and written to match the
City of Dallas Police Uniforms for Qualitv. workmanshio. desi2n and esoeciallv
lon2 term wearabilitv. The Dallas Police DeDartment's ooinion on this uniform~
oer Quartermaster D. Thorv. "we have not found a better and more durable. lon2er
wearin2 material in todavs market olace. we have Datrol officers that have
uniforms that are over four years old." I have Dersonallv talked to three Dallas
patrol officers and their opinions were all the same "the uniforms are
comfortable. durable and it ~ave them ~ersonal and Drofession oride".
(CONTINUED)
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.,
I
Date :.
9/24/84
It is evident that the initial change over will be expensive, but we
will be able to achieve the change over within the allotted budget. Our greatest
savin~s will come from future purchases, by not having to meet minimum orders, and
we will no lon~er be in a sole source situation.
I have already been contacted by some local security services who
have expressed an interest in purchasing our old uniforms.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the purchase of new uniforms
from Donavan Uniform in an amount not to exceed $25,634.91
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
wRt
YES X
80-2200
80-2200
NO
4 608.91
$21,026.00
I
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
IOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
Request For: Police Uniforms
Bid Opening Date: September 17, 1984 At 10:00 A.M.
iQ{¡~
Date:
Requisition No.
Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 A .M. September 17, 1984
City of North Richland Hills, P. Q. Box 18609
North A Ichland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: John Whitney Phone: 817-281-0041
PRICING
SUMMER UNIFORM
Short Sleeve Shirt $ 40.00 Ea.) X 106 = 4,240_00 Total
With Buttons
Trousers $ 45.00 Ea. X 103 = 4,635.00 Total
Motorcycle Breeches $ 125.00 Ea. X 3 = 375.00 Total
WINTER UNIFORM
Long Sleeve Shirt $ 45.00 Ea. X 106 = 4,770.00 Total
With Buttons
Trousers $ 45.00 Ea. X 103 = 4,635.00 Total
-
Motorcycle Breeches $ 125.00 Ea. X 3 = 375.00 Total
Winter Jacket $ 67.50 Ea. X 106 = 7.155.00 Total
Navy Blæ D-117 Round Style Cap 19.95
Delivery Time From Date Of Order
120 Days
" Delivery time is the period of time elasping from the time the order is presented
to the contractor, until such time as the Police Department receives the order
at 7301 Northeast Loop 820."
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
1.
WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
non consideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which non consideration is properly requested may be returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2.
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3.
IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
4.
REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
Proposal containing any irregularities.
Unbalanced value of any items.
Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie 7.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r"
I
5.
DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6.
AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
ASSIGNMENT
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Mariager~ Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8.
NOTICE OF DELAYS
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however. may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9.
BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
(a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
I
I
_0. BID QUOTES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
--
I
Uniform items specified herein shall be considered as one (1) contract and
will be awarded to onlY'one (1) bidJer. Only the total overall bid cost on
items specified in this contract will be considered. However, a breakdown
of prices for each type of garment must be submitted with the bid.
11. BID SAMPLES
On the opening date of the bids, vendors being considered for the contract
will be contacted to submit one (1) each sample of each style of garment
specified in the contract. The deadline for submitting the samples will be
no later than the bid opening date. These items will be examined for quality
of workmanship, materials used, style, and contract compliance, as provided
for in the outlined specifications. These garments shall be retained by the
Police Department for the duration of the contract to be utilized as a
standard of comparasion, for the future orders rendered by the contractor.
Upon completion of the contract, the aforementioned samples shall become
the property of the North Richland Hills Police Department. Samples submitted
by vendors who do not receive the contract will be retained by the North
Richland Hills Police, for a period of ten (10) working days after awarding of
the contract. At the end of that period, any samples not picked up by the
vendor will become the property of the Police Departmant to be disposed of
as it sees fit. Further, in conjuction with the submission of the aforemen-
tioned samples, the bidder will submit written certification as to the identity
of the mills providing the piece goods utilized in the construction of thèir
samples.
Failure of bidders to submit samples and piece good certification by the deadline
date indicated above, may result in a bidder being disqualified regardless
of the quality and/or cost of the merchandise bid upon.
12. UNIFORM PATTERNS
The contract bidder shall provide uniform items in both male and female design
and size ranges. Uniform orders will consist of the following clothing items:
1 . Male Shirts
2. Male Trousers
3. Female Shirts
4. Female Trousers
5. Motorcycle Breeches
Trousers shall be provided in short, regular, and long rise patterns according
to the ordering individuals need. Shirts will be provided in semi-form or form
fit patterns as dictated by the ordering individuals need. Shirt sleeve lengths
on winter shirts will be provided in one (1) inch gradiants on male and female
patterns.
I
I 13.
Ie
14.
I
I 15.
I
I . 16.
I 17.
I
I.S.
I
I 19.
I
I
I
I
I
r"
I
The contractor will maintain at the contractors place of business, at no
additional cost to the City of North Richland Hills, competent personnel to
preform any and all alterations, repairs, make ready, or miscellaneous sewing
as needed. Further, the contractor must be in a position to begin operations
on the opening date of the contract.
Contractor shall begin measuring as soon as a contract is awarded at the City
of North Richland Hills Police Department, located at 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
New personnel hired during the year or other personnel with special uniform
needs» will be measured at the contractor location.
The delivery date of uniforms is a critical matter to the Police Department.
Therefore, the delivery dates bid will become part of the contract. Failure
of the contractor to meet these dates will result in the invocation of the
penalty clause specified in this contract.
PENALTY CLAUSE: Failure of the contractor to complete delivery dates as
prescribed in their quote, will subject the contractor to the penalties
of $1.00 per item per working day.
The fabric supplied by the contractor must be guaranteed as to a) color,
b) non-Pilling or frosting, c) minimum normal'wear of the fabric for three
(3) years, d) where the material has been specified, the material shall be·
stamped Kaumographed in such a manner as to identify the mill/or material.
Each article furnished must meet the approval of City of North Richland Hills
Police as to material, workmanship, and fit.
Contractor will not accept orders from or sell any uniform items and/or
accessory to any person without proper authorization from the City of
North Richland Hills Police_Department. Proper authorization shall be:
Captain of Uniformed Patrol, Chief of Police or his designated representative.
This information shall be furnished to the contractor receiving said contract.
Mandated inventory amounts will be maintained in stock at the location of the
contractor at all times. On hand inventory of stock in this contract means,
"the prescribed number of uniform items depicted herewithin, and an adequate
number of buttons required to make the shirts maintained in the inventory
serviceable within the prescribed delivery time." Uniform Inventory stock
to be maintained on hand will be computed as follows:
An amount equal to 30% of the total orders received by the contractor
during a contract year based on the anticipated usage amounts furnished
by the Police Department, excluding the number of uniform items ordered
during the spring and fall mass orders. Pursant to the figures provided
in this contract, the following inventory minimums are established:
527 Total Items To Be Ordered
x .30%
158 Total Contract Inventory
One-half (~) of the total contract inventory , or 79 uniform items shall be
maj.ntained on hand at all times. The "in-stock" items shall be maintained
in a pro-rated per centile range of types of items (male and female shirts,
trousers, etc.), and in size ranges proportionate to the quantities to types,
sizes, and designs.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
~
I
Upon 24 hours noticet the Purchasing Agent reserves the right to conduct
an on site premise audit of the distributors inventory to insure that said
distributor is in compliance with the above mandated inventory requirements
of the contract. Failure of the distributor to have an amount equal to
90% of the mandated minimum inventory on hand is grounds for termination
of the contract.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
.
MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASE
1.
Delivery shall be to the location identified on the purchase order within
the City of North Richland Hills.
2.
The contract will be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications at
the price bid.
3.
In the event of partial shipments or multiple deliveries, the quantities
shown on the bid are estimated quantities only. The City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to purchase more than or less than the
quantities shown. In any event, the unit bid prices shall govern.
4.
Bidder warrants that all deliveries made under the contract will be of the
type and quality specified; and the City of North Richland Hills
Purchasing Agent may reject and/or refuse any delivery which falls below
the quality specified in the specifications. The City of North Richland
Hills shall not be held to have accepted any delivery until after an
inspection of same has been made and an opportunity to exercise its right
of rejection has been afforded.
All manufacturers' warranties shall inure to the benefit of the City of
North Richland Hills, and replacement of'defective materials shall be made
promptly upon request. ·
6.
Failure by the contractor to make reasonable delivery as and when requested
shall entitle the Purchasing Agent to acquire quantities from alterna~e
sources wherever available, with the right to seek reimbursement from the
contractor for amounts, if any, paid by the City of North Richland Hills
over and above the bid price.
7.
All materials delivered shall be free of any and all liens and shall upon
acceptance thereof become the property of the City of North Richland Hills
free and clear of any materialman"s, supplier's, or other type liens.
8.
Regardless of the award of a contract hereunder, the City of North Richland
Hills retains the right to purchase the same or similar materials or items
from other sources should it be determined that doing so would be in the
City's best interest, based on cost and quality considerations; however, in
such event, the contractor will be given the first option of meeting or
rejecting the proposed alternate source's lower price or higher quality.
9.
Acceptance by the City of North Richland Hills of any delivery shall not
relieve the contractor of any guarantee or warranty, express or implied,
nor shall it be considered an acceptance of material not in accordance with
the specifications thereby waiving the City's right to request replacement
of defective material.
I
I
Ie
I
I Material:
I Style:
Tailoring:
I
Collar:
I
I Yoke:
Ie
I Sleeve:
I Facings:
I
I Pockets:
I
I
Badge Tab:
I
~
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
UNIFORM SPECIFICATIONS
SHIRTS - SUMMER
8 to 8-1/2 ounce tropical Polyester (55%) and wool (45%),
two-ply in warp and filling, pre-shrunk and stock-dyed;
the fabric to be Raeford Style '561-96 or approved equivalent.
Semi-military cut.
All edges to be single-stitched 1/4 inch, and all seams shall
be double-stitched 1/4 inch.
Shall have 3-1/8 inch points and be inner-lined with collar
canvas. Collar band is to be lined with a good grade of rayon
or silk. Collar is to be equipped with collar stays of suit-
able rigidity and proper length to have a single button collar
band with no overlapping ends.
There shall be an inside yoke of appropriately colored twill
with a point in the center, to be stitched with two (2) rows
of stitching 1/4 inch apart, to show on the outside of the
shirt and imitate yoke.
Short, to be finished length of nine (9) inches from the top
shoulder seam and six (6) inches long at the inseam. To have
one (1) inch hem when finished. Hem to be turned under, with
an additional 1/2 inch turned under to eliminate raw edges.
To have inside and outside facings. Inside facing to be one
(1) inch wide, and to conta1ne five (5) stud holes with under-
flap made of good grade twill. Outside facing to be 1-1/2
inches in width and to contain six (6) buttonholes. The bottom
button 1s to be 24 ligne bone.
Shall have two (2) pockets, patch-type, size five (5) inches
in width, and 6-1/2 inches deep. Pencil pocket to be sewn
to inside of left pocket, and finished with opening at top
of flap one (1) inch wide. Flap to be 3-pointed military
style, finished with no raw edges showing on outer or under
side. Top of pocket to be seven (1) inches from front shoulder
seam to top center of pocket flap.
Overall length to be 2-1/2 inches. Bottom of tab to be 1-1/4
inches above pocket flap on left breast. Eyelets will be 1-1/2
inches apart on badge tab. Eyelets to be 1/2 inch from the
top and the bottom of the badge tab.
I
I
e
IIshirt
Tail:
Turned under hem around entire bottom of shirt and not to
exceed 5/16 inch in width. The length of the shirt shall be
in proportion to the sleeve length, and will be measured from
the neck band down middle of back to crotch.
I
Epaulets:
I
To be of same material as shirt. Stitched into sleeve seam
and cross-stitched to shoulder. Buttonhole at collar end.
Epaulet button protector tab will be sewn inside the shirt.
It will be stitched to the shoulder and sewn inside the collar
band.
I
Buttons:
II
I
There will be seven (7) locations for buttons on the front of
the shirt, including one (1) at the collar. All will be evenly
spaced, approximately 3-1/2 inches apart. The button on the
collar and the bottom button on the shirt will be color-matched
bone. All other button locations, including cuffs, epaulets
and pockets, will have button shank holes for detachable metal
buttons. All buttons will be furnished by the contractor (see
contract guidelines for button speèifications).
I Sizing:
Semi-form fitting pattern, form fitting pattern, or made-to-
measure pattern, as ordered (see requirements for made-to-
measure in contract guidelines).
Ie
I
II
II
I
I
II
II
~
I
Female shirts shall be the same pattern cuts as described above
and will not have darts, but shall be cut to female sizes and
proportions.
I
I
Ie
I Material:
I Style:
Tailoring:
I
I
I Yoke:
I
SHIRTS - WINTER
11 to 11-1/2 ounces tropical Polyester (55%) and Wool (45%)
3-ply, in warp and filling, pre-shrunk, stock-dyed; the fabric
is to be Raeford Style #3933-96, or approved equivalent.
Semi-military cut.
All edges are to be single-stitched 1/4 inch, and all seams
shall be double-stitched 1/4 inch.
Collar:
Shall have 3-1/8 inch points and be inner-lined with collar
canvas. Collar band is to be lined with a good grade rayon
or silk. Collar is to be equipped with collar stays of suit-
able rigidity and proper length to have a single button collar
band with no overlapping ends.
Shall have an inside yoke of appropriately colored twill with
a point in the center, to be stitched with two (2) rows of
stitching 1/4 inch apart, to show on the outside of the shirt
and imitate yoke.
I.leeve:
Long, shall have conventional-type reinforèed elbow patches.
Cuffs are to have two (2) buttons and buttonholes, and the
placket will have one (1) button and buttonhole. Four (4)
stud holes are to be placed under the armpit; two (2) in the
body and two (2) in the sleeves (see contract guidelines for
sleeve sizing).
I
I Facings:
I
Pockets:
II
I
I Badge Tab:
I
--
I
Are to have inside and outside facings. Inside facing is to
be one (1) inch wide, and to contain five (5) stud holes with
under flap made of a good grade of twill. Outside facing is
to be 1-1/2 inches in width, and contain six (6) buttonholes.
The bottom button is to be 24 ligne bone.
Shall have two (2) pockets, patch-type, five (5) inches in
width and 6-1/2 inches deep. Pencil pocket is to be sewn to
the inside of left pocket and finished with opening at top of
flap one (1) inch wide. Flap to be 3-pointed military style,
finished with no raw edges showing on outer or under side.
Top of pocket to be seven (7) inches from front shoulder seam
to top center of pocket flap.
Overall length is to be 2-1/2 inches. The bottom of the tab
is to be 1-1/4 inches above the pocket flap on the left breast.
Eyelets will be 1-1/2 inches apart on the ba~ge tab. Eyelets
are to be 1/2 inch from the top and the bottom of the badge
tab.
I
I ~irt Tail:
I
Epaulets:
I
I Buttons:
I
I
I Sizing:
I
Ie
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
~
I
Turned under hem around entire bottom of shirt and not to
exceed 5/16 inch in width. Shirt measurement for length to
be taken from neck band down middle of back to crotch.
Same material as shirt. Stitched into sleeve seam and cross-
stitched to shoulder. Buttonhole at collar end. Epaulet
button protector tab will be sewn inside the shirt. It will
be stitched to the shoulder and sewn inside the collar band.
There will be seven (7) locations for buttons on the front of
the shirt, including one (1) at the collar. All will be evenly
spaced, approximately 3-1/2 inches apart. The button on the
collar and the bottom button on the shirt will be color-matched
bone. All other button locations; epaulets and pockets, will
have button shank holes for detachable metal buttons. All
buttons will be furnished by the contractor. See contract
guidelines for button specifications.
Semi-form fitting pattern, form fitting pattern, or made-to-
measure pattern, as ordered (see requirements for made-to-
measure in contract guidelines).
Female shirts shall be the same pattern cuts as described above
and will not have darts, but shall be cut to female sizes and
proportions.
I
I
Ie
T~OUSERS
.1 STANDARD UNIFORM
rial:
11 to "-1/2 ounces tropical Polyester (55%) and Wool (~5%),
3-ply, in warp and filling, pre-shrunk stock-dyed. The fabric
is to be Raeford Style 13933-96, or approved equivalent.
I
The trousers shall be made by a full-cut uniform pattern with
a modified flair bottom. They shall be plain in front and
made with side pockets, having a minimum of 6-112 inches open-
ing, and two (2) back pockets with six (6) inches opening.
The left pocket shall have a buttonhole and button.
, e!-tband:
To be '-3/~ inches wide, and lined with 1-1/2 inches Snug-Tex.
I
Ie
To be made from 1250 Sa11 Drill or a 50% Polyester and 50%
Cotton material, black harmony trim, 2.70 weight, minimum 72 x
60, and each garment is to have four (~) pockets; two (2)
side and two (2) hip pockets. Side pockets shall be six (6)
inches in depth from bottom of the opening. Hip pockets shall
be seven (7) inches in depth. All pockets are to be bar-tacked
at the end of the openings.
It Loops:
Keystone type, seven (7) in number, '-3/~ inches wide by 1-3/~
inches long, to accommodate 1-1/2 inch wide belt.
F
Inseam L~d outseam are to be open with unfinished edges serged.
The seat seam is to be open and serged. Inside of the seam
is to be taped and double-stitched.
laid:
Braid for trousers (including supervisors) 1s to be gold colored
piping with 1/8 inch showing, American Thread Color Shade 1938,
sewn to the garment and into the outseam to the bottom of the
pocket. All braid is to extend from the bottom of the pocket
to the length of the garment.
,I
ry:
To have French fly and heavy-duty brass zipper with a positive
lock.
Ihread
The thread used in the manufacture of each garment shall be
Filco VNS black thread. or an approved equivalent or better.
I
--
I
I
I
Ie
RIDING BREECHES
taterial:
11 to 1'-112 ounce tropical Polyester (55%), and Wool (45%),
3-ply, in warp and filling, pre-shrunk, and stock-dyed. The
fabric is to be Raeford Style 13933-96, or approved equivalent.
!stYle:
Officer's riding breeches, full peg, reinforced at the calf
opening around the metal zipper.
!waistband:
Pockets:
I
I
To be 1-3/4 inches wide, and lined with 1-1/2 inches Snug-Tex.
To be made from '250 Sail Drill, or 50% Polyester and 50% Cotton
material, black harmony trim, 2.10 weight, minimum 72 x 60,
and each garment is to have four (4) pockets; two (2) side
and two (2) hip. Side pockets shall be six.(6) inches deep
from the bottom opening. Hip pockets shall be seven (7) inches
deep and 1/2 inch below the waistband. All pockets are to be
bar-tacked at the end of openings.
IBel t LOOf-S:
Keystone type, seven (7) 1n number, 1-3/4 inches wide by 1-3/4
inches long, to accommodate a 1-1/2 inch wide belt.
Ir
Inseam and outseam to be open with unfinished edges serged.
Seat seam is to be open and serged. Inside of seams are to
be taped and double-stitched.
IBraid:
Braid for breeches (including supervisors) 1s to be gold colored
piping with 1/8 inch showing, American Thread Color Shade #938,
sewn to the garment and into the outseam to the bottom of the
pocket. Braid is to extend from the bottom of the pocket to
the length of the garment.
I
I
I
Supervisory officer's braid is to be black mohair, 1-3/4 inches
in width, and is to extend from the waistband to the length
of the garment.
I
Fly:
I
I
--
I
Rank designation shall be noted on the uniform order form.
The braid 1s to be supplied and sewn on by the contractor prior
to delivery.
To have French fly and heavy-duty brass zipper with a positive
lock.
I
I
e
I FEMALE PATTERN
Iterial:
IYle:
I
listband:
fCkets:
I
~
tams:
I.aid:
I
Ilacket :
tread:
I
I
--
I
" to '1-'12 ounces tropical Polyester (55%) and Wool (~5%),
3-ply, in warp and filling, pre-shrunk, stock-dyed. The
fabric is to be Raeford Style '3933-96, or approved equivalent.
The trousers shall be made by women's uniform pattern, with
a modified flair bottom. They shall be plain in front and
made with side pockets with e minimum of 6-1/2 inches opening.
They shall have two (2) back pockets with six (6) inches opening.
The left back pocket shall have a buttonhole and button.
To be '-3/~ inches wide, lined with '-112 inches Snug-Tex.
To be made from 1250 Sa1l Drill or a 50% Polyester and 50%
Cotton material, black harmony trim, 2.70 weight, minimum
72 x 60, and each garment is to have four (~) pockets;
two (2) side and two (2) hip pockets. Side pockets shall be
six (6) inches in depth from bottom of the opening. Hip pockets
shall be seven (7) inches in depth. All pockets ãre to be
bar-tacked at the end of the openings.
Keystone type, seven (7) in number, 1-3/4 inches wide by 1-3/4
inches long, to accommodate 1-1/2 inch wide belt.
Inseam and outseam to open with unfinished edges serged. Seat
seam is to be open and serged. Inside the seam is to be taped
and double-stitched.
Braid for trousers (including supervisors) is to be gold colored
piping with 1/8 inch showing, American Thread Color Shade 1938,
sewn to the garment and into the outseam to the bottom of the
pocket. All braid is to extend from the bottom of the pocket
to the length of the garment.
To have a placket opening on the left side. with a heavy-duty
brass zipper ,with a positive lock.
The thread used in the manufacture of each garment shall be
F1lco VNS black thread. or an approved equivalent or better.
I
I
BUTTONS
I~ button and button fasteners shall be supplied by the contractor. Buttons and
fasteners for uniform shirts shall be Gold and affixed to each summer shirt and
winter shirt.
I Any and all other buttons noted throughout the uniform specifications are in
addition to the buttons described herein.
I Buttons and fasteners are as follows:
All buttons are to have the words "State of Texas" around the diameter of the
button. with the letter "p" for "Police" stamped in the center of the button.
I All buttons described in these specifications are to be metal shank type buttons,
twenty-four (24) ligne.
These buttons are available from the Waterbury Companies as per the following
I stock numbers:
Gold Tone Buttons
Watcos Stock Number
I Button Toggles
Watcos Stock Number
01-00-90-2434-19906
03-00005-00-00-42800
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
WINTER JACKET
I
I e Style: Lawman
Manufacturer: Fetchimer or Equivalent
I Epaulets: None
I
Color: Black
I
Buttons: All buttons shall be gold with the words "State of Texas" stamped
around the diameter of the button. with the letter "p" for "Police"
stamped in the center of the button. (same specifications as the summer
and winter shirts). All buttons seal I be affixed to each jacket before
delivery.
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r-
I
I ~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
lie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
DATE:
9/24/84
~, ....-'.2
('.:'~ \..- -
SUBJECT:
Repayment of Property Taxes on Bank Shares
DEPARTMENT: Finance
BACKGROUND: There was a lawsuit filed in 1981 by American State Bank Questionina
the validity of the City of Fort Worth's method of taxation of Federal Obli2ations
held as investments by the Bank. The bank won the lawsuit in 1982 and the
attached aareement is a settlement of that lawsuit.
Pursuant to the above lawsuit the City Council passed Resolution 82-3
dated January 11~ 1982~ whereas the City aareed to abide by the outcome of the
above lawsuit and escrowed funds in the amount of $60,620.75 to refund a portion
of taxes paid under protest.
The City of North Richland Hills reached an aareement with the banks
in September of 1983 as to the amount of taxes for the tax years 1981 and 1982~
but held that if any entity in Tarrant County neaotiated "a more favorable
astreement" we would be aranted the same provisions prior to the settlement date of
October 15. 1984. This is the reason for the Droposed amendment we are askin2 to
be reviewed. The terms of the aareement previously approved bv the City Council
are as follows:
(1) The City shall refund to each respective bank seventy-five
percent (75%) of the funds paid to the City for the tax year 1981 and
1982;
(2) All refunds payable to the banks shall be due and payable no
later than October 15~ 1984~ or the City may elect to Day back over a
three year Dav-out:
(CONTINUED)
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
Date:
9/24/84
(3) If the City elects to pay-out the tax refunds, interest will be
due to the banks at the rate of 70% of the prime rate as charged by
the Texas American Bank on October 15th of the year preceding,
commencing October 15, 1985.
The City of Fort Worth and Fort Worth Independent School District had
provisions in their agreements that were more favorable than ours, as listed
above. Those terms are listed as follows:
(1) Retainage of thirty percent (30%) of taxes for tax years 1981 and
1982 instead of twenty-five percent (25%);
(2) Pay-out refund in five yearly installments instead of three
yearly installments,
(3) Interest rate on installment pay-out - same as original
agreement.
The attached Schedule "A" is an analysis of the Fort Worth Agreement
To summarize Schedule "A" the net savings to
compared to our original agreement.
the City is listed as follows:
1981 Taxes
1982 Taxes
1983 Taxes
Total Savings to NRH
$2,052.16
978.89
452.77
$3,483.82
(CONTINUED)
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
Date:
9/24/84
Also an analysis was made to determine the interest income 2enerated
versus interest expense paid out to the banks during the five year pay-out of the
$48,773.34 as calculated amount due from Schedule "A". Several assumptions were
made using the criteria as outlined in the Fort Worth Agreement. Those are listed
as follows: (see attached Schedule B)
(A) That the Prime Rate as charged by Texas American Bank will remain
constant at 13.5%;
(B) The City will pay 70% of 13.5% = 9.45%. That figure will remain
constant;
(C) Interest received on investments will be the amount currently
Quoted on investments in T-Bill's in the amount of 10.25%. The
estimated net savin2s to the City (see Schedule "B") is projected to
be $780.34 if paid out over a five year period is all my assumptions
remain constant. Historically interest rate charged on Prime Rate
and on investments have not remained constant.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Based on the minimal savings of $780.34, time
require to maintain the bookkeeping, and the uncertainty of interest rates, it is
the staff's recommendation that the City of North Richland Hills utilize the "more
favorable a~reement" clause contained in the Fort Worth A~reement to refund to the
banks the total amount of $48.773.34 due on October 15. 1984.
BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO N/A
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
I Þ< N ....;t 0 \0 N
tØ CO \0 0 ....;t CO
E-t . .
CO M M 1.11 N CO
I M \0 N \0 1.11 0 M
CO \0 CO 1.11 0 ........ M
0\ ~ ~ ~
...... "'" M 0'\ \0
Ie .u; .u; .u;
\0 \0 N M
Þ< ........ co \0 M
C\1
I ...... I 1.11 ........ ~ "'"
\0 0 ...... '" 0 0
N I M 1.11 '" ........
~ ~ ~
\0 M 0\ M
...... ...... ......
.u; .u; .u;
I
...... ........ M 0\
I Þ< N N 1.11 ...... ......
cø . \0 . .
E-t ...... 0\ M ~ 0
0 N N "'" 0 M
...... ....;t 0 ...... 0 '" '"
co ~ ~ \0 ~
0\ 1.11 ...... ~ ...... co
I ...... ...... N ....;t "'" N
.u; .u; <l)-
I Þ< N "'" 0 \0 0
cø co \0 0 "'" \0
E-t . .
co M M 1.11 iN! ......
M \0 N \0 Lrt Lt'\ 0'\
I co \0 00 1.11 0 ........ ........
0\ ~ ~ ~
~ ...... ....;t M C'\ \0
<I)- <I)- <I)-
~
Ie s
f;3 \0 \0 N N
= ........ co \0 N
t.)
00 ...... I 1.11 ........ ~ M
I \0 0 ...-4 '" 1.11 00
N I M 1.11 ........ \0
~
\0 M C'\ "'"
...... ...... ...... ........ "'" M
<J)- .u; <I)- ...... M 00
I . .
~ '" M M
.... Lrt '" 00
0 N '" "'"
~ ~
N 00 M
...... ........ 1.11 M 1.11 1.11 "'"
I Þ< N N \0 ...... M <l)- I <I)-
cø .
E-4 ...... C'\ N M ~ N
0 N ...... "'" 1.11 00
...... "'" 0 \0 0 ........ ........
00 ~ ~ ~
0\ ""' ...... "'" ...... 0
I ...... ...... N -4' M ~ ~
<I)- <I)- <I)- <U <U
~~ ~~
= u = u
=' cø =' C\1
~.o 4-I,.c ~
I QJ I QJ I .u
~ ~ ~ ~ -M
ct1 cø t.)
QJ ~ <U ~
.0 ..c 0
N ~ .u
~ 0 1.11 00
I ~ .u '" .µ'" CI)
CI) òO
ct1 M M CI) òO en òO =
>< C\1 ..c: QJ c:: Q) c:: .,...
cu d u >< -rot Þ<-M >
E-4 0 -rot <U ctS CI) C\1 tI) ctS
.,... ~ ....... .µ :s .µ:s U)
I ..c: .µ "'0 ..c
.µ Cd ~ Q) C\1 ....... C/) ....-i en .......
~ z cu .µ ~ ctS~ Cd~ Cd
0 .µ u C\1 .µ = .µ c:: .&oJ
Z .µ -M QJ ø. o C\1 o C\1 0
t- en c:: ....... H cu E-f~ E-4~ E-f
~ C\1 Þ ....... p::
0 Q) 0 ~
..c: .µ u c:: .......
~ .µ co :s C'd
c:: .... .... Þ< ~ .&oJ
C\1 0 .,... C\1 cu 0
~ z ~ E-f ~ E-t
I
I "......,
.µ
-M
~u
S "" 0 \0 M ...::t
I o 0 ...... ...... 0 0 M
U .µ . . . . .
= N ...::t \0 00 0
H ~ ...... M "" ....... 00
Ie f/.) M N ...... .......
.µ = .q; .q; .q; .q; .q;
~ C1J
Z
><
~
'-"
I ~
s CI)
0 .µ
u = co 0\ 0 N 0\
= ~ ("I') ...::t \0 ....... ......
I H S . . . .
.µ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ co
.µ f/.) 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
f/.) C1J 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
~ > ... ... ...
~ = ("I') N ...... 0\
~ H .q; .q; .q; .q; .q;
I .µ
= =
H 0
I ~I w
""
N
.
0
......
I "......,
~
s
I ~..-t
f/.) ~
c:Q =~
~ ("I') 0\ ...::t 0\ ""
f;EJ ø..~ N ("I') "" \0 co
:3 >< 0 . . .
~ ....... "" ("I') ...... .......
Ie ~ ~ co \0 ~ N ......
~ .µO \0 ....... 00 0\ N
= (I)....... ... ... ...
u ~'-" ("I') N ...... 0\
CJ) ~ .q; .q; .q; .q; .q;
C1J
I .µ .µ
= ....
H U
0
.µ
I ~I w
""
~
.
I 0\
CIJ
~
C1J =
I ..c Cd
c:Q '-ð
0
.¡.JM ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
M ("I') 0 ('f") 0 M e ('f") e M ("I')
.¡.J Cd . . . . . . . . . 0
= M "" 00 "" ("I') "" 00 "" M M U
I :s 0 ....... "" ..... "" \0 ~ 0 "" ~ "" z
o .µ ....... ....... e ....... N ....... "" ....... ....... ....... H
J!~ ... ... ... ...
co 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ E-4
QJ ~ M N ..... CJ)
r-I"'Ø .q; .q; .q; .q; -ø- f;EJ
Cd r:: ~
I .µ :s f;EJ
O~ E-4 ~
E-4 Q) Z E-4
~ H H
U
...
~ 0
I .µ .µ +J +J +J cnE-4
= = = = = ffi~
Q) Q) Q) ~ Q)
Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:s ~o
-- ~ Cd Cd Cd Cd Cd ~u
~ ø.. ø.. ø.. ø.. z
r-f ~ H
Cd ~ "" \0 ....... 00
+J 00 00 00 00 00 E-4 E-4
0 0'\ 0\ 0\ 0'\ 0\ 0 ~
E-4 ..... ..... ..... ...... ..... E-4 Z
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 27, 1984
1., Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 84-87, Request of Esther Edwards Evans
for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Three E Ranch Addition
3a. Consideration of Ordinance on Promotion of Drug Paraphernalia
3b. Resolution Commending Pat Moffatt
4. Adjournment
There will be an executive session following this meeting to discuss
personnel, land and/or litigation.
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS
ENGINEERS · PLANNERS
3921 VANCE ROAD · FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118
.
284-0981
September 27, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lot 1, Block 1
Three E Addition
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
In reference to Knowlton-Engl ish-Flowers I letter of September 24, 1984, we
offer the following comments:
1. Present zoning is agricultural.
2. The metes and bounds description as shown on the plat is the proper legal
description of the subject property. It is the developerls intention to
dedicate the area in question to the City at the time of plat acceptance.
3. No exceptions taken.
4. The apparent right-of-way appears to be fifty feet (501) based on existing
County records.
5. Drainage certificate has been affixed to the plat.
6. & 7. The developerls are prepared to dedicate to the City the required
amount of rignt-of-way for future improvements in lieu of any escrow money
or paving.
8. No exceptions taken.
9. It is the developerls understanding that the purpose of escrowing their
prorata share of the future twelve inch (1211) water main is to provide them
with adequate fire protection at SUCh time that the proposed water line is
constructed.
10. & 11. Enclosed is a copy of the approved permit from the Tarrant County
Health Department.
Should you have any questions or need further information, please do not
hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
Scott Stewart
~ncl0sllrø~
I
I
I-
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I,·
I
I
I
I
I-
I
ORDINANCE NO.
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that:
In order to control illegal use of controlled substances within the
City the following is hereby adopted and approved as an Ordinance
prohibiting promotion or sale of drug paraphernalia within the City limits:
SECTION I. DEFINITIONS:
(A) The term "Drug Paraphernalia" means all equipment, products and
materials of any kind which are used or primarily intended for use, in
planting, propagating, cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing,
compounding, converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing,
analyzing, packaging, repackaging, storing, containing, concealing, injecting,
ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled
substance in violation of this section. It includes, but is not limited to:
(I) Kits used or intended for use in plating, propagating, cultivating,
growing or harvesting of any species of plant which is a controlled
substance or from which a controlled substance can be derived;
(2) Kits used or intended for use in manufacturing, compounding,
converting, producing, processing, or preparing controlled substances;
(3) Isomerization devices used or intended for use in increasing the
potency of any species of plant which is a controlled substance;
( 4) Testing equipment used, or intended for use, in identifying, or in
analyzing the strength, effectiveness or purity of controlled substances;
(5) Scales and balances used, or intended for use, in weighing or
measuring controlled substances;
(6) Diluents and adulterants such as quinine hydrochloride, mannitol,
mannite, dextrose and lactose, used, or intended for use, in cutting
controlled substances;
(7) Separation gins and sifters used, or intended for use, in removing
twigs and seeds from, or in otherwise cleaning or refining, marijuana;
(8) Blenders, bowls, containers, spoons and mixing devices used, or
intended for use, in compounding controlled substances;
(9) Capsules, balloons, envelopes and other containers used, or
intended for use, in packaging small quantities of controlled substances;
(10) Containers and other objects used, or intended for use, in storing
or concealing controlled substances;
I
I
I-
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
.Page 2
(11) Hypodermic syringes, needles and other objects used, or intended
for use, in parenterally injecting controlled substances into the human
body;
(12) Objects used, or intended for use, in ingesting, inhaling, or
otherwise introducing marijuana, cocaine, hashish oil into the human
body, such as:
a) Metal, wooden, acrylic, glass, stone, plastic, or ceramic pipes
with or without screens, permanent screens, hashish heads, or
punctured metal bowls;
b) Water pipes;
c) Carburetion tubes and devices;
d) Smoking and carburetion masks;
e) Chamber pipes;
f) Carburetor pipes;
g) Electric pipes;
h) Air-driven pipes;
g) Chillums;
J) Bongs; and
k) Ice pipes or chillers
(b) The term "promote" as used herein shall mean manufacture, sell,
transfer, offer for sale, or display for sale or transfer knowing, or under
circumstances where one reasonably should know, that the drug paraphernalia
will be used by the recipient or intended recipient to plant, propagate,
cultivate, grow, harvest, manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process,
prepare, test, analyze, package, repackage, store, contain, conceal, inject,
ingest, inhale, or otherwise unlawfully introduce into the human body a
controlled substance or dangerous drug.
(c) Controlled substance and dangerous drug as used in this section
refers to those substances defined by the "Texas Controlled Substances Act",
Vernon's Ann. Civ. St., Article 4475-15 and the "Texas Dangerous Drug
Act", Article 4476-17.
(d) "Person, association, and corporation" shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 1.07 of the Texas Penal Code.
. (e) "Intentionally, knowingly, recklessly and criminal negligence" shall
have the meaning set forth in Section 6.03 of the Texas Penal Code.
(f) "Presumption" shall have the meaning and procedural effect set
forth in Section 2.05 of the Texas Penal Code.
I
I
re
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I'
"Page 3
SECTION II. EVIDENTIARY RULES:
(A) In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia, a court or
other authority should consider, in addition to all other logically relevant
factor, the following:
(1) Statement by an owner or by anyone in control of the object
concerning its use;
(2) Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control
of the object, under any State or Federal law relating to any controlled
substance or dangerous drug;
(3) The existence of any residue of controlled substances or
dangerous drug on the object;
(4) Circumstantial, as well as direct, evidence of the degree of
criminal responsibility as set forth in Section 3.03 of an accused under
this Article to promote drug paraphernalia.
(5 ) Instructions, oral or written, provided' with the object
concerning its use;
(6) Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain or
depict i t8 use;
(7) The manner in which the object is displayed.
(8) Direct of circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the
object (s) to the total sales of the business enterprise;
(9) The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in
the community;
(10) Expert testimony concerning its use.
(B) A person or corporation who possesses six (6) or more drug
paraphernalia items it presumed to be possessing for the purpose of promoting
drug paraphernalia. Identical items shall constitute one item for the purpose
of determining the six (6) i terns.
(C) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution that the charged party's
conduct was authorized by V.A.C.S., Articles 4476-15.
SECTION III. OFFENSES:
It shall be unlawful for any person, association, or corporation, to
intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence promote, or
possess for the purpose of promotion, or permit, allow, or suffer to be
promoted, or possess for the purpose of promotion, on property for which he
has a greater right to possession that the general public, drug paraphernalia
as defined by this ordinance. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or
corporation to sell, or offer for sale, barter or trade and drug paraphernalia
within the City limits.
I
I
--
I
I,·
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
.. Page 4
SECTION IV. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDUCT OF ANOTHER:
(A) A person is criminally resporlsible as a party to an offense if the
offense is committed by his own conduct, by the conduct of another for which
he is criminally responsible, or by both. Each party to an offense may be
charged with commission of the offense.
(B) A person is criminally responsible for an offense committed by the
conduct of another if:
(1) acting with the kind of culpability required for the offense, he
causes or aids an innocent or nonresponsible person to engage in
conduct prohibited by the definition of the offense;
(2) acting with intent to promote or assist the commission of the
offense, he solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the
other person to commit the offense; or
(C) In a prosecution in which a person's criminal responsibility is based
on the conduct of another, the actor may be convicted on proof of commission
of the offense and that he was a party to its commission, and it is no
defense:
(1) that the party belongs to a class of persons that by definition
of the offense is legally incapable of committing the offense in an
individual capacity; or
(2) that the person for whose conduct the actor is criminally
responsible has been acquitted, has not been prosecuted or convicted,
has been convicted of a different offense or of a different type or class
of offense, or is immune from prosecution.
(D) If conduct constituting an offense herein is performed by an agent
acting in behalf of a corporation or association and within the scope of his
office or employment, the corporation or association is criminally responsible
for such offense.
SECTION V. SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE:
Any drug paraphernalia, as defined in this section, shall be subject to
seizure and civil forfeiture by law enforcement authorities acting under either
a valid warrant or pursuant to a violation observed by the seizing officer.
Such actions shall be subject to the applicable sections of State law
SECTION VI. FINES FOR VIOLATION:
Any person, firm or corporation violating any portion of this Ordinance
shall be punished by a fine not in excess of One Thousand Dollars ($l, 000) .
Each day of operation shall be considered a separate violation.
I
I
re
I
I--
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
.. Page 5
SECTION VII. SEVERANCE CLAUSE:
If any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid for any reason, it
shall not affect the remaining valid portions.
SECTION VIII. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES:
All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith, shall be,
and the same are hereby repealed.
SECTION IX. DECLARING AN EMERGENCY:
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication as provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 27th day of September, 1984.
Dan Echols - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire - City AttorIley
I
I
{I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
RESOLUTION NO. 84-27
WHEREAS, Mr. Pat Moffatt has served as City Manager of Haltom
Ci ty for the past 21 years; and
WHEREAS, he has served in that capacity with wistlom, "
professionalism, compassion for his fellow human beings, steadfastness and
integrity; and
WHEREAS, the citizen of North Richland Hills as well as Haltom City
have benefitted from Pat Moffatt's leadership due to their sharing of a common
city boundary; and
WHEREAS, the bond of friendship and goodwill between the cities
has been strengthened by Pat Moffatt's willingness and desire to provide
support and assistance for worthwhile area projects; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the North Richland Hills City Council
to extend gratitude and best wishes to Pat Moffatt upon his decision to enter
into his well-deserved program of retirement and other pursuits;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of North Richland Hills, Texas, recognizes and commends Mr. Pat Moffatt
and extends its appreciation for his service to the Northeast Tarrant County
community.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 27th day of September, 1984.
Dan Echols - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
I
I
Ie
I
I.
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO
Rodger N. Line, City Manager
9-11-84]
Ãi ~TE
Gene Riddle, Director Public Works SUBJECT
Fog Sealing Program
FROM
REF: PWM- 0039-84
I would like to request that $65,000 be appropriated from the Contingency Fund to
fog seal some streets that I feel need immediate attention.
As you know. we did not plan on any sealcoating programs this year because we
were ordering a new distributor in the 1984-85 budget. We had plan on aoing the
sealing with our own maintenance crews after we received the new distributor.
Since we had such a harsh winter and we are having such a dry summer. I do not
feel that some of the streets can make it through another winter without completely
coming apart. I have attached a list of the streets that I would recommend
the fog sealing be applied and showing the amount of lineal footage on that
street. The total length of the streets listed is approximately 8 miles.
I estimate that we can do between 9 and 10 miles of street for $65,000 with
competitive bidding.
I would also like to point out that fog sealing is a new process here in the
City and basically it is the same as our regular seal coating except we do not
use the gravel cover after the asphalt oil is sprayed on the street. This is
a quicker process and more economical than the old process.
After the bids are in we will add some other streets that are not on this list
if they can be funded within this $65,000.
I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
FOG SEAL
Footage
RICHLAND HILLS WEST ADDITION
Onyx Dr. N.
Dawn
Venice
Blende
Jannie
Bonzer
Dawn to Rufe Snow
Onyx N. to Onyx S.
Onyx N. to Onyx S.
Onyx S. to Jerrell
Charles to Rufe Snow
Onyx S. to Jerrell
2600
1600
1600
650
950
800
8200
RICHAVEN & RICHLAND OAKS
Grove
Laura
Lazy Ln.
Wyoming
Nevada
India
Hwy 26 to Bedford Rd.
Ash, to Colorado
Ash to Colorado
Hwy 26 to Bedford Rd.
Bedford Eu1ess to Jerri Jo
Colorado to Nevada
1200
1450
1275
1850
1650
600
8025
CLEARVIEW ADDITION
Bob
Colorado to Harwood
1050
COLLEGE HILLS
Whitfield
College Cir.
Price
Abbott
Johnson Ave.
Johnson Ct.
Holiday to Deaver
Ross to Bogart
Terry to Watauga
College to Watauga
Abbott to Price
All
1050
1450
, '1750
1275
325
375
6225
FOSTER VILLAGE
Green Acres
Green Dale Ct.
Shady Dale Ct.
Crosstimber
Rufe Snow to Crosstimber
All
All
Starnes to Fair Meadow
1350
825
425
900
3500
BRIARWOOD
Briarwood Post Oak to Briardale 700
Briar Cliff Ct. All 550
Noneman Post Oak to Smithfield 1525
Briardale Hewitt to Briarridge 1900
Sweetbriar All 575
5250
'I·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
SMITHFIELD ESTATES
Cox
Cross
Cross to Turner
Payte to Davis
NORTH PARK ESTATES
Chat am
Harwick
Winchester
Oldham
Buckingham
Little Ranch
Sudbury
Yarmouth to Buckingham
Yarmouth to Winchester
Yarmouth to Buckingham
Yarmouth to Buckingham
Watauga to Oldham
Watauga to Sandhurst
Dorchester to End
TOTAL
700
1100
1800
1050
1075
1175
~ 1275
1175
1200
· 1450
8400
42450 feet
8 miles
127,350 sq. yds
/If' ,
..'
, ......... . ~ "'" -~ .
I ..
'1-
I_UBJECT:
c
(
r
, r I l.h ...... ......... .'__ .._,
DATI:
9-19-84
Oversizing Water Mains for Summer Hills Addition - Watauga
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I DEPARTMENT: Utility
BACKCROUND: This subdivision is located north of Watauga Heights East, south of
Foster Village and West of Rufe Snow. The reason for the long delay in awarding
the bids is the developer was waiting for the City of North Richland Hills to
release the contract due to the overloaded sewer line. I checked these bids and
found that W. A. Harrison's bids was the lowest for the city's participation.
The City's share of the water lines is $60,886.00 (the difference between
an 8"main required for the subdivision and a 16 main as required by our masterplan).
I CIn COUNCIL ACTION aEQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the bid for water oversizing for
4IÞ Summer Hills Addition - Watauga.
I
I lonGUED ITEK:
ACCOUNT NUHBEI:
YES
x 110
02-11-01-6700
Ii/~~ ¿:/IA~ ~
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
~
,
Dale Riley and Associates
3900 Acapulco Irving, Texas 75062 (214) 255- 2154
September 19, 1984
Mayor Dan Echols
Members of the City Council
City of North Richland Hills
Re: Summer Hills Addition
Watauga, Texas
Developed by OTX, Inc.
Gentlemen,
Thank you for considering the release of the work orders
for the subject property. Due to the delay of the last year
we are very anxious to start this project. We feel that our
work will parallel the off site sewer work being done by the
City of North Richland Hills and that we will finish about
the same time. However should there be any question regarding
use of the sewer, we agree that no homes will be occupied
until the outfall portion is completed.
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
r
1-
. ,
o T X, I NC.
3900 ACAPULCO
IRVING, TEXAS 75062
256-2372
Mr. Gene Riddle
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Reque~ted City Participation
Summer Hills Addition - within the
City of Watauga for the City of
North Richland Hills - Oversize Water Mains
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the city participation we are requesting
as prepared by our engineer, Owen D. Long, for the oversize water mains
within and adjacent to the Summer Hills Addition. Our bids were taken on
February 20, 1984 at your City Hall.
As shown on the participation breakdown, the oversize water is the
difference between a 1611 main and an 811 main for an amount of $60,886.00.
Please review our request and forward it to the City Council for their
consideration and approval. If you have any questions, please give me
a call.
We appreciate your consideration.
¡Si nc{;~\~((/ ~
, ,;I,t ( (
: L,-.
l ".~
Dale Riley, V. P.
OTX, I NC 0
" , r t ...
ODL/ml
encl.
I ','
~
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~
, ,
Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
September 17, 1984
REQUESTED PARTICIPATION - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
PROJECT: SUMMER HILLS ADDITION (WATAUGA)
(Using W. A. Harrison's Bid - Bids Taken 2-20-84)
OWNER:
OTX, INC. - DALE RILEY, Vo Po
OVERSIZE WATER MAINS
2820 L.F.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 8" and 1611
3 Each
1 Each
2.72 Tons
75 L.F.
1 Each
1 Each
1 Each
Main @ $14.25 per LoF. ---------------- $ 40,185.00
Gate Valve @ $3,605000 Each ----------- 10,815.00
Tapping Saddle @ $750eOO Each ---------- 750.00
Fittings @ $1,925.00 per Ton ----------- 5,236.00
Street Bore @ $10.00 per L.F. ----------- 750.00
6" Blow-Off @ $1,375.00 Each ------------ 1,375.00
41 Dia. Sump Manhole @ $725.00 Each ---- 725000
1" Air Release Valve @ $1,050.00 Each---- $ 1,050.00
TOTAL OVERSIZE WATER ------------------ $60,886000
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone (817) 281-8121
I
dr:-
C~:, t ,/,
DATI:
9-19-84
I-
. _SUBJECT:
I
Over sizing Water Mains for Foster V~llage, Section 17 Watauga
I
I
DEPARTMENT: Utility
BACKCROUND: This section of Foster Village is located on the corner of Whitle~ Road
and Bursey Road. The reason for the delay in awarding the bids is the developer
was waiting for the City of North Richland Hills to release the contract due to the .
overloaded sewer lines. I checked these bids and found that Huffman Construction's
I
I
bid was the lowest for the city's participation.
The city's share of the water lines is $36,260.40 (the difference between an
-I
8" ma.in required for this subdivision and a 12" main and a 16" main as required
by our m~sterp1an).
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the bid for water mains oversizing
for Foste.r Village Section 17 - Watauga.
BUDGETED ITat:
ACCOUNT IfUKIEl:
YD X 110
02-11-01-6700
I.
,. ,
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
..
r
SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
901 Summit Avenue
P.O. Box 470337
Ft. Worth, Texas 76147
334-0686
Mr. Gene Riddle
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Requested City Participation
Foster Village - 17th Filing - Within the
City of Watauga for the City of North Richland
Hills - Oversize Water Mains
Dear Mro Riddle:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the city participation we are requesting
as prepared by our engineer, Owen D. Long, for the oversize water mains
adjacent to the Foster Village 17th Filing. Our bids were taken back on
August 8, 1984, at your City Hall.
As shown on the attached copies of our breakdown for participation,
the oversize water is the difference between a 16" and an 8" main
(for an amount of $22,649.50) and the difference between a 12" and
an 8" main (for an amount of $13,610.90) - making the total request
for oversize water mains of $36,260.40.
Please review our request and forward it to the City Council for their
consideration and approval. If you have any questions, please give me
a call.
We appreciate your consideration.
I.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
r
Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
September 17, 1984
REQUESTED CITY PARTICIPATION --- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
PROJECT: FOSTER VILLAGE - 17TH FILING- WATAUGA
(BIDS TAKEN 8-8-84 - USING HUFFMAN CONSTRUCTION CO. BID)
OVERSIZE WATER MAINS
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 811 AND 16"
1150 L.F.
1 Ea.
1 Ea.
1 Eao
Main @ $16.53 per L.F. = $19,009.50
Gate Valve @ $2,790$00 Eao = 2,790000
1" Air Release Valve @ $800.00 Eao = 800.00
lit Threaded Outlet @ $50.00 Ea. = $ 50000
Sub Total Oversize ----------------$22,649050
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 8" and 12"
1910 L.F.
4 Ea.
0.505 Ton
Main @ $5.99 per L. F. = $11,440090
Gate Valve @ $290.00 Ea. = 1,160000
Cast Iron Fittings @ $2,000. per Ton 1,010.00
Sub Total Oversize --------------- $13,610090
Total Oversize Water ----------------------------$ 36,260.40
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 I Hurst, Texas 76053 I Phone (817) 281-8121
I.
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
p, o. BOX 470337 . FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76147 . 901 SUMMIT AVENUE· (817) 334-0686
JAMES R. HARRISt JR.
VICE PRESIDENT
Mr. Alan Bronstad
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
Dear Alan:
September 18, 1984
We appreciate your consideration in issuing the work order for
Section 17 of Foster Village. We understand that no homes will
be allowed occupancy until the subdivision has been connected
to the new sewer main to be constructed in ~his area.
JRH:ga
Very truly yours,
,'"
/
/
. .... ' ,./. -': . .
.r ~~ \.... - --.., ,/ t. '- ~ ----:)
J~mes R. Harris, Jr.
I
1-
e;UIJECT:
I
,;:¡.~
r-
~, I
DATI: 9-19-84
Installation of High Service Pump at. Conn Booster Station - - Partial Pav
Estimate 111
I DIP AJlTKENT:
BACKGROUND:
Utility
Installation of high service eump at Conn Drive Booster Station a~Droved
I
I
I
I
I
·1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
by City Council on June ll~ 1984.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/dispparove contractor's partial estimate #1 to
ISI Contractors & Engineers Inc. in the amount of $17,286.00 for materials furnished
and work performed.
BUDGETED liD:
YES
x
10
('J¡J ¿ "
'~~¿~l// :Jll~
ACCOUNT NUMBEI:
Revenue Bonds
I
.
...
I~
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
-'." --:...·..·J¡.-,·...~-...,Æ~;,r:~..t;~,..~.. ';,'/;,..(,_. ~_.,.; r""':
KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
Se~tember 12. 1984
Mr. Rodger M. l1fte. C1 ty Ha....ger
C1ty of North R1ch1and H111s
7301 N.E. loop 820
~rth Rfch1.nd Hills, rexls 76118
R.:
-ç:nclosed 11 one copy of CORtr.ctor's P.rUII '11 Estilnlte No. One (1), dated
August 30, 1984. _de PAYlble to ISI Contr.ctOl'$ 'M Engtneers, Inc., in the
.",ou"t 01 $11,2'16.00, for nuterflh fvrnhhed 1M work performed on tile re"".
ttncad project as 01 AMgust 30. 1984.
We nave verified the quantities and condition of the work on-site IS we11 as the
ite~ extensions .nd additions on the .st1~t..
we reconmeftd that this PI,..nt in the .....t of $11,266.00, be mede tQ ISI COq-
tractors and Engineers, Inc., It p.O. 80x 11375, Ft. ~orth, Texas 75109-0375.
~-- Æ~
&ENJAHIH S. SHA~KlIN
8SS/1jc
Ene 1 osure.
CC: Mr. l@e M.nesl. Director of Finance
~. Gene R1dd1e. Director of Pub11c Works """"""-
,"if" . ,'11 en ~rons tad. .1\$ 5 1 s tékl1t D1 rector of Pub He Works~ THIS COpy FOR
!S!SO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 .817/283-8211. METRO/287-3387
ì
I
i
J
~
I
t
,
I
j
~
f.'
l~
:1
I
~
¡~.
:~
1- · · ,to ".
-;~-:-.,. .~ 151 CONTRACTORS
I · & ENGINEERS, INC.
P. O. Box 11375
_ FOR1 WORTH. TEXAS 76109-0375
I-
o City of North Richland Hills
I c/o Knowlton-English-Flowers," Inc'~-----
550 First State Bank Building
Bedford, Texas 76021
I
~.. .:...'~ '
~"t
.....~ M: ........ .
~_l.......~~.....-~ ,.....; "',', .....~ .~....'_....
(817) 926-9294
TERMS
per con tract.
-
.
DESCRIPTION
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I-
I
PROGRESS BILLING NO . 1
Contract Amount - Original
Change Order No. 1
Contract Amount to Date
Percent Complete - 95%
10 % Retainage
NET DUE
DATE
JOB NAME
JOB LOCATION
,,--......
,: ,..~, : :
"""~ '
r- -;
.J' .
r
. .... ~
"-"".'-"
.. 1"--'. :.
- ....'-
..... .,- ,", "'.
....-
"'1-/ð-l.y
1020
August 30, 1984 106
,q., JOB NO.
Installation of High
Service Pump
Conn Drive Booster Station
North Richland Hills, .Texas
PRICE
AMOUNT
$ 17,930 00
+ 2,288 00
$ 20,218 00
$ 19,207 00
- 1,921 00
$ 17,286 00
~. Ðw
· .-'
Ie
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
Ie
I' CEln-lJ--
I J .
I 5J
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO.
1
TO:
City of North Rich1and Hills
c/o Know1ton-English-Flowers, Inc.
550 First State Bank Building
Bedford, Texas 76021
Date August 30, 1984
o I- j g j 11 ¡¡ I C 0 J} t t4 rt C t
No. or Date
A III 0 It n t ............................... $
Change Orders &
Extras Amount
17,930.00
OIle
$ 2,288.00
Net Tota1 Chan ge Orders
............................ $
2,288.00
Con tract An}oun t to Da te $
20,218.00
Per CeJlt COlnplete to Date
95
<l
o
................... $
19,207.00
Less
10
% Retainage . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,921.00
Less Previous Billings
................................
-0-
A.nOlll1 t Due This Billillg
Sui) I nit t e () ß Y :
COlll(Jany Name
l\·Jailin g ^ (1(Ires;
City & State
Project
Type C"