HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1984-10-22 Agendas
I.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 22, 1984 - 6:30 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER
*1.
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
Executive Session to Discuss Personnel,
Land and/or Litigation
2. Discussion of Re-appointment of CIP
Committee
3. Discussion of Request from "On Stage" -
Trinity Arts Foundation for Financial
Support (Agenda Item #11)
4. Discussion of Joint Meeting With
Planning & Zoning Commission on October
25, 1984, Regarding Master Plan
5. Discussion of Can-Am/Trans-Am Race at
Green Valley (Texas Challenge)
6. Discussion of Other Items
* Closed as Provided by the Open Meeting
Law
I.
I
-
II For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers.
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
I_~consideration of Consent Agenda Item (s)
indicated b Asterisk
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
~I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 22, 1984
NUMBER ~ ITEM
~ Call to Order
~
ACTION TAKEN
".../
~ Roll Call
/'"
;r: Invocation
r
I¡
Consideration of Minutes of the Re ular
Meeting October 8, 1984
Consideration of Removin
Consent Agenda
from the
PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL HEARING - PZ 84-61. Request of
Charles Owen ComDanv to Rezone Tract 10D~
J. H. Barlou2h Survey. Abstract 130. from
R-2 (Sin2le Familv) to C-2 (Commercial)
(Located on the west side of Davis
Boulevard. bounded on the west bv Colle2e
Hill Addition. and aDDroximately 100 feet
north of Ross Road)
Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-61
I.
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
¡I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 22, 1984
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers.
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
ITEM
PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL HEARING - PZ 84-72, Request of Jeou
Hock Lin to Rezone a Portion of Lot 2,
Block 13, Snow Heights North Addition from
C-2 (Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale'
of Alcoholic Beverages (Located on the east
side of Rufe Snow Drive and bounded on the
south by McDonald's Restaurant)
ACTION TAKEN
Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 84-72
*fi. Consideration of Request from "On
Stage" - Trinity Arts Foundation for
Financial Support
*tz'~ Consideration of Bids for Self-Propelled
Striping Machine
~,.
*13. Consideration of Bids for Partitioning for
the Municipal Complex
",/"'
* Consideration of Ratification of Purchase
of IBM Displavwriter. Diskette Unit and
Printer
Consideration of Re uest for Authorization
to Institute Eminent Domain Proceedin2s for
17. Adjournment
I
I
II-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
J
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
-'
DATE:
10/22/85
SUBJECT:
Can-Am/Tréns-Am Race at Green Valley (Texas Challenge)
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: The promoters of the Grand Prix Race, held in Dallas last July, are
conducting a Can-Am/Trans-Am Race at Green Valley on October 27th and 28th. As
you know, the courts have enjoined the City from interfering in the conduct of
racing on this site. The promoters expect between 20,000 - 30,000 spectators for
this race. The promoters have been very cooperative with the Police Department in
arranging for off-duty Dolice support for traffic control and security.
Approximately 100 lette~s have been sent by the Police Department to residents in
the Green Valley area e<plaining our situation and offering to assist in
minimizing inconvenienc~~.
Chief McGlasson will be present at Pre-Council to brief you on steps
that have been taken to attempt to avoid a situation similar to the one we were in
a few years back during the rock concert.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
FOR INFORMATION ONLY
BUDGETED ITEM: YES
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
NO
I.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
f
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - OCTOBER 8, 1984 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
Mayor Echols called the meeting to order October 8, 1984,
at 7:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
2.
Present:
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
Jim Kenna
Virginia Moody
Harold Newman
Jim Ramsey
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
Gene Riddle
Richard Albin
Lee Maness
John Whitney
Press:
Duward Bean
Mark England
3.
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
ROLL CALL
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
City Attorney
Director Public Works/Utilities
City Engineer
Finance Director
Purchasing Agent
Northeast Chronicle
Mid Cities Daily News
The invocation was given by Mayor Pro Tem Davis.
INVOCATION
4.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve the minutes of the regular meeting September 24,
1984.
Motion carried 7-0.
5.
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 24, 1984
APPROVED
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve the minutes of the special meeting September 27, 1984.
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 27, 1984
APPROVED
Motion carried 6-0; Mayor Pro Tem Davis abstaining due to
absence.
6.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed items #34 and #35.
CONSIDERATION OF
R~IOVING ITEM (S)
FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA
I.
1
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
7.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 7-0.
8.
Mayor Echols advised that this item would be passed until the
recipient was present.
9.
Mayor Echols advised that the following recommendations had
been made:
Reappoint Davis McGilvary (term exp1r1ng 10/8/87). Place 2;
J. Douglas Davis (term expiring 10/8/87), Place 3; Don Tipps
(term expiring 10/8/87), Place 4; Neil McCombs (term expiring
10/8/86, Place 5; Bill Burk (term expiring 10/8/86), Place 6;
Howard Nix (term expiring 10/8/85), Place 7, vacant.
Mayor Echols stated that Councilwoman Moody had a recommenda-
tion for Place 7.
Councilwoman Moody recommended the appointment of Vonnie Waiser
for Place 7.
Councilman Ramsey called for point of order. Councilman Ramsey
stated this was a Mayor's appointment.
Mayor Echols stated that he was the one that gave Councilwoman
Moody the profile sheet on Vonnie Waiser.
Councilman Ramsey asked that in the future all Council members
be furnished profile sheets on perspective board members.
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher to
approve the appointments as recommended.
Motion carried 7-0.
October 8, 1984
Page 2
CONSIDERATION OF
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM (S) INDICATED BY
ASTERISK (22, 23, 24,
25, 26, 27, 28, 29,
30, 31, 32 & 33)
APPROVED
PRESENTATION OF
PROCLAMATION BY MAYOR
ECHOLS
CONSIDERATION OF
APPOINTMENTS TO THE
PARK AND RECREATION
BOARD
APPROVED
I,
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
October 8, 1984
Page 3
10. Mr. Gary Nickleson, representing Mr. and Mrs. Byrd. appeared PLANNING & ZONING _
before the Council. PUBLIC HEARING-APPEAL
HEARING, PZ 84-52,
Mr. Nickleson stàted that the Byrd's had lived in the City REQUEST OF DOYNE S.
since 1959 and started their business. Byrd's Automotive, in BYRD FOR AN APPEAL
1961. Mr. Nickleson stated the first request the Byrd's made HEARING TO REZONE LOT
for a zoning change was considered by the Planning and Zoning 3R, BLOCK 23.
Commission in June. 1983 and at that time was approved. Mr. CLEARVIEW ADDITION
Nickleson stated that when the request went before the Council FROM C-1 (COMMERCIAL)
for approval it was denied. Mr. Nickleson stated that the TO C-2-SPECIFIC
Byrd's were issued tickets by the City for parking vehicles on USE-SALE OF USED
land that was not paved so the lot was paved. Mr. Nickleson AUTOS (LOCATED ON THE
stated'the request was brought back before the Planning and SOUTH SIDE OF
Zoning Commission and was denied, therefore they asked for an MAPLEWOOD DRIVE AT
appeal hearing before the Council. Mr.. Nickleson stated he GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY)
realized that the zoning laws were for a purpose, which were
approved by the Council and enforced by the City Staff. Mr.
Nickleson stated that all the property owners within 200 feet
of the property in question had been contacted just to see what
the reaction would be on the zoning request. Mr. Nickleson stated
he had a petition that had been signed by 75% of the property
owners that were in favor of the request. Mr. Nickleson stated
the petition was signed not only by the businesses in the area
but also the residential residents. Mr. Nickleson stated that
they found no one who opposed the request, 25% that did not
sign the petition were not against the request. Mr. Nickleson
stated that the surrounding property was zoned C-1 or C-2.
Mr. Nickleson stated he felt the C-2, Specific Use would be
the highest and best use of the property.
Councilman Ramsey asked if cars were currently being sold at
the location.
Mr. Nickleson stated no.
Councilman Kenna asked if there was a City policy on an age
limit of the automobiles.
Mr. Line stated it was not written in the Zoning Ordinance,
but there had been stipulations placed on this type of
business in the past.
Mr. Nickleson stated there was not a written policy in the
City that he could find. Mr. Nickleson stated that on the
last car lot that was approved the stipulation was a car could
not be over two years old.
Councilwoman Moody stated that her understanding was that any
reasonable stipulations the City placed on a Specific Use
would be agreeable with the applicant.
Mr. Nickleson stated that was correct.
Councilman Fisher asked where the sales office would be
located.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
Mr. Nickleson stated that the office would be in Byrd's
Automotive. Mr. Nickleson stated that as soon as possible
they could put a building on the site.
Councilwoman Moody asked if they would be building an office
on the site.
Mr. Nickleson stated yes.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked if there was a limit of the number
of cars that could be parked on the lot.
Councilman Ramsey stated that a stipulation could be placed on
the specific use on the number of cars that could be kept.
Mr. Nickleson stated they would agree to a stipulation.
Councilman Newman asked if the lot was large enough for a car
lot.
Mr. Nickleson stated yes, it was going to be a small used car
lot.
Councilman Fisher asked if there would be an entrance from
Highway 26 into the lot.
Mr. Nickleson stated no, the entrance would be from Maplewood.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Nickleson if he could estimate
the number of cars that would be on the lot.
Mr. Nickleson stated there would probably be less than 30
cars.
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Nickleson if he would like to propose
the number of cars.
Mr. Nickleson stated less than 25 cars.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Nickleson if he was aware that
there was a minimum percentage of the property that had to be
landscaped.
Mr. Nickleson stated there would be no problem with the
landscaping.
Councilman Fisher asked what would keep the people from
parking in front of the lot in the bar-ditch.
Mr. Nickleson stated they would do everything possible to
discourage it and the business would not be open at night.
Mayor Echols asked if they would be willing to post no parking
signs.
October 8, 1984
Page 4
I
I
Ie
I
I
I 8.
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
Mr. Nickleson stated yes.
Councilman Newman asked how close the nearest residence was
and what hours the lot would be open.
Mr. Nickleson stated the nearest residence was across
Grapevine Highway and the hours would be from 8:00 a.m. until
5:00 p.m.
Councilman Ramsey stated that he would like to ask the Council
to depart from the rules so that item number 8 could be
presented since Dr. Williams was present.
Mayor Echols presented the following proclamation:
WHEREAS, on Friday, September 28, 1984 a heavily armed
man entered Richland High School in North Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, this young man randomly, recklessly and without
regard for life, fired a submachine gun throughout the lobby
of Richland High School; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Ray E. Williams, Principal of Richland High
School, with total disregard for his own safety, did verbally
subdue this felon by demanding the immediate surrender of all
weapons; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Ray E. Williams, through his immediate and
decisive action, prevented further injury to the 2,000
students under his care; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the bravery inherent
in this action; and
WHEREAS, the professional bearings and stature of Dr. Ray
E. Williams has been long noted;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Dan Echols, Mayor of North Richland
Hills and upon behalf of the City Council and the citizens of
this City, do proclaim October 17, 1984 as
"DOCTOR RAY E. WILLIAMS DAY"
in North Richland Hills and call upon all citizens to share in
this day of recognition and appreciation.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the
public hearing.
October 8, 1984
Page 5
PRESENTATION OF
PROCLAMATION BY MAYOR
ECHOLS
CONTINUATION OF
ITEM 10
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
11. Councilman Ramsey moved to deny PZ 84-52, Ordinance No. 1156.
Motion died for the lack of a second.
Councilwoman Moody moved. seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve PZ 84-56, Ordinance No. 1156, with the stipulation
that the business be open from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., be
landscaped within the limit of the City's ordinances, no
additional lighting. no entry from Grapevine Highway and be
restricted to cars not over two years old.
Councilman Ramsey stated he had heard that anyone that voted
against this request would be open for a law suit and he was
also told that if he voted against the request it would be
because Mrs. Byrd was Dan Echols Campaign Manager. Councilman
Ramsey stated that apparently some people had short memories,
it was not too long ago that the City Attorney was informed to
close down a day-care center not more than two blocks away from
the property because the neighborhood was upset about it.
Councilman Ramsey stated he had looked at the petition in
favor of this request and he had two phone calls from people
who strongly objected to the rezoning request. Councilman
Ramsey stated the Council had been through a series of events
with the principals of this particular property who apparently
had no respect for the laws of the City. Councilman Ramsey
stated first there was the hydraulic lift, which he helped
them obtain the platting and zoning. Councilman Ramsey stated
the second episode was when a used car lot sign went up
attached to the building and he received a call from a
neighbor, he informed the City Staff and they took action.
Councilman Ramsey stated that he thought it was a slap in the
face to the City when an ad was placed in the telephone book
advertising Byrd's Used Car Sales, which was a violation of
the Ordinance. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt the Council
had an obligation to stand behind their Oath and enforce the
laws of the City.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he agreed with the facts that
Councilman Ramsey had stated but the question was what was the
best use of the land. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he had
always been a firm believer that Grapevine Highway should be
commercial business that would generate higher land values and
possible higher sales tax for the City. Mayor Pro Tem Davis
stated he was in a very strong dilemma about what the highest
and best use of the land was.
Motion carried 6-1; Councilmen Fisher, Kenna, Newman and Mayor
Pro Tern Davis and Councilwoman Hinkle and Moody voting for;
Councilman Ramsey voting against.
October 8, 1984
Page 6
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ
84-52
ORDINANCE NO. 1156
APPROVED
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
12. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of the request to please 'come
forward.
Mr. Ronnie Lewis, 8609 Smithfield Road, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Lewis stated he was asking for the rezoning to R-3 in order
to build onto his existing home.
Mayor Echols asked if the entrance to the property was from
Smithfield Road.
Mr. Lewis replied yes.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to the request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the public hearing.
13. Councilman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve PZ 84-63, Ordinance No. 1157.
Motion carried 7-0.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he would like to ask a question in
regard to item #10. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked the City
Attorney if a Specific Use Permit was issued for the car lot,
would it be issued in one name only.
Mr. McEntire stated yes, the permit would be issued in the
name of Byrd.
14. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come
forward.
Mr. Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, representing Oak Hills
Joint Venture, 1615 Precinct Line Road, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Long stated they were requesting the rezoning for Lots 12
thru 37, Block 7, Oak Hills Addition, in order to build duplexes
next to the railroad track.
Councilman Ramsey asked how may lots were involved.
Mr. Long stated 26 lots.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the public hearing.
October 8, 1984
Page 7
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING PZ
84-63, REQUEST OF
AUBREY C. LEWIS TO
REZONE TRACTS 3A1 &
3AIA, JOHN MCCOMAS
SURVEY, ABSTRACT
1040, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO R-3
(SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF SMITHFIELD
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY
500 FEET SOUTH OF
O'DELL STREET)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ
84-63
ORDINANCE NO. 1157
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING PZ
84-66, REQUEST OF
KENNETH C. WHITLEY,
TRUSTEE, OAK HILLS
JOINT VENTURE, TO
REZONE LOTS 12 THRU
37, BLOCK 7, OAK
HILLS ADDITION FROM
R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY)
TO R-4-SD (SEPARATE
OWNERSHIP-DUPLEX)
(LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF ST. LOUIS AND
SOUTHWESTERN
RAILROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 379
FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF
AMUNDSON ROAD)
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
15. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve PZ 84-66, Ordinance No. 1158.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt this would be close to
spot zoning and also an increase in traffic.
Motion carried 6-1; Councilmen Kenna, Fisher, Newman, Ramsey,
and Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody voting for; Mayor Pro Tem
Davis voting against.
16. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, 1615 Precinct Line Road,
representing Oak Hills Joint Venture, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Long stated that as a point of clarification, the TP&L
easement and Lot A, Block 7, was one in the same. Mr. Long
stated he felt this property could only be used for a small
office.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the public hearing.
17. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to
approve PZ 84-68, Ordinance No. 1159.
Motion carried 7-0.
18. Mayor Echols opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, 1615 Precinct Line Road,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Long stated the lots were presently zoned R-3 and
agriculture. Mr. Long stated the request was for 0-1 and
would be used in conjunction with PZ 84-68.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to the request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the public hearing.
October 8, 1984
Page 8
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ
84-66
ORDINANCE NO. 1158
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING PZ
84-68, REQUEST OF
KENNETH C. WHITLEY,
TRUSTEE, OAK HILLS
JOINT VENTURE, TO
REZONE LOT A, BLOCK
7, OAK HILLS ADDITION
AND THE TEXAS POWER
AND LIGHT EASEMENT
FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO 0-1 (OFFICE
DISTRICT) (LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD
AND ST. LOUIS AND
SOUTHWESTERN
RAILROAD)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ
84-68
ORDINANCE NO. 1159
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING PZ
84-69, REQUEST OF
KENNETH C. WHITLEY,
TRUSTEE, OAK HILLS
JOINT VENTURE, TO
REZONE LOTS B, 38 &
39, BLOCK 7, OAK
HILLS ADDITION FROM
AG (Agriculture) AND
R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY)
TO 0-1 (OFFICE
DISTRICT) (LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF
AMUNDSON ROAD AT THE
ST. LOUIS AND
SOUTHWESTERN
RAILROAD)
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
III
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
1- -
19. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
approve PZ 84-69, Ordinance No. 1160.
Motion carried 7-0.
20. Mr. Ramon Medlenka, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Medlenka stated he would like to build a house in the
Stoneybrook Addition using stucco with tile roof. Mr. Medlenka
stated the house would be larger than the existing houses.
Mr. Medlenka stated the stucco would look better with the tile
roof.
Councilwoman Moody asked how the stucco compared to brick with
regard to the Brick Ordinance.
Mr. Riddle stated that brick had a higher fire rating.
Mr. Medlenka stated that-under VA and FHA Standards the
materials in stucco made it like concrete.
Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Medlenka if he planned to live in
the house.
Mr. Medlenka stated yes.
Councilman Newman asked if there were any houses in the area
built with stucco.
Mr. Medlenka stated no.
Councilman Newman asked Mr. Medlenka what his alternative
would be if the request was denied.
Mr. Medlenka stated he would be forced to go with brick.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
deny the request.
Motion carried 5-2; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilmen Fisher,
Ramsey and Newman and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for;
Councilman Kenna and Councilwoman Moody voting against.
21. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to
grant the appeal hearing, to be heard November 12, 1984.
Motion carried 7-0.
October 8, 1984
Page 9
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ
84-69
ORDINANCE NO. 1160
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF MR. RAMON
MEDLENKA FOR A
VARIANCE TO THE BRICK
ORDINANCE
DENIED
CONSIDERATION OF
GRANTING AN APPEAL
HEARING FOR PZ 84-60
- J. D. SCOTT
GRANTED
I October 8, 1984
Page 10
I *22. CONSIDERATION OF
Ie RATIFICATION OF
CONTRACT WITH LARRY
W. DIXSON, ARCHITECT,
FOR NEW FIRE STATION
I APPROVED
*23. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR MISCELLANEOUS
I STREET IMPROVEMENTS
(SHERIDON DRIVE,
PARAMOUNT DRIVE,
I LINMA LANE, BEWLEY
STREET AND ARNOLD
TERRACE)
APPROVED
I *24. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR PALOMAR DRIVE
I PAVING AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
I *25. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
Ie DIVISION VEHICLE
APPROVED
I *26. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR TEN (10) POLICE
MARKED PATROL
I VEHICLES
APPROVED
*27. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
I FOR TWO (2) 4-WHEEL
DRIVE BLAZERS-FIRE
DEPARTMENT
I APPROVED
*28. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR FIRE MARSHALL AND
I ARSON INVESTIGATOR
VEHICLES (ONE EACH)
APPROVED
I *29. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR JANITORIAL
I SERVICE (MUNICIPAL
COMPLEX & RECREATION
CENTER)
1_ APPROVED
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
*30.
*31.
*32.
*33.
34. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
appropriate $95,000 from Reserve Funds for the construction of
the south side of Hightower Drive and also to include that the
developer of the Century Oaks Addition negotiate with the
Parker's, within the next two weeks, and come back to the
Council on whether or not the Parker's would or would not
give the right-of-way, 30 X 300 feet and at that time the
Council would make other considerations that might be
necessary at that time.
Councilman Ramsey stated that the City had an ordinance that
stated exactly what everyone was suppose to do in a case such
as this. Councilman Ramsey stated that he felt the Council
should not get in the middle of this until the people had made
good faith to abide by the ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he felt the developers
intentions during preliminary platting, final platting and
zoning, and all the conversations with the staff and Council,
had been made in good faith. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he
felt by giving the developers two weeks to talk to the
Parker's, to work out a solution, should be ample time to
report back to the Council.
October 8, 1984
Page 11
CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR FOG SEALING OF
CITY STREETS
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR STREET SWEEPING
CONTRACT
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE 112, TO
GIBBINS CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT
OF $39,184.65
- CALLOWAY ACRES
STREET AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE #2, & FINAL,
TO ISI CONTRACTORS
AND ENGINEER IN THE
AMOUNT OF $2,932.00 -
CONN DRIVE BOOSTER
STATION
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF CITY
PARTICIPATION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS OF
HIGHTOWER DRIVE
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Councilman Ramsey stated that it was surprising to him that if
the City agreed to oversize a water line or whatever, the City
did not have to put up the difference in order for the
developer to proceed and he felt that was what was happening
tonight. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt this would be a
wrong move and felt the City should abide by the ordinance.
Councilwoman Moody stated she agreed with Councilman Ramsey
and felt the Council had been placed in a very awkward
position. Councilwoman Moody stated she felt that no move had
been made that the Council could determine, that negotiations
had been made and this was something that was very hard for
her to deal with.
Mayor Echols stated he thought there was a basic question as
to whether or not the Council was setting the stage for
negotiation.
Councilman Ramsey stated the ordinance was clear and there was
nothing in the ordinance that said the City had to anti up, it
was the intent of the ordinance and the City should abide by
it or else do away with the ordinance. Councilman Ramsey
stated he felt the City should not get involved until the
people had the time to do what they were suppose to.
Councilman Ramsey stated he felt that all the City was doing
was helping the developer go to the lending institution and
proceed and he totally disagreed with the Council getting in
the middle of the process.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt it would be beneficial to
the City and to the traffic in that area that the street go
all the way through. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he felt the
City had been unfair to the developer because of an oversight,
his plans and plat were approved and now the City was telling
him to stop. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the developer had
admitted to the City that they were not aware of that
particular section of the ordinance and did not think that
anyone on the Council was aware of it until last week. Mayor
Pro Tern Davis stated he did not think it would be fair if the
Council decided not to fund the money and if the developer and
the Parker's did not come to an agreement on the right-of-way,
he did not think he should have to stop his development.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated it would benefit the City if the
street was there.
Councilman Ramsey stated he did not feel the street was the
issue, the issue was whether or not the City was going to get
involved with a developer so he could go to a lending
institute to keep doing what he was for a certain amount of
time. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt the City should not
get involved.
Councilman Ramsey called for the question.
October 8, 1984
Page 12
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
tl
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Motion failed 5-2; Councilmen Newman, Ramsey, and Kenna and
Councilwoman Moody and Hinkle voting against; Councilman
Fisher and Mayor Pro Tem Davis voting for.
Councilman Kenna stated he would like to recommend that the
developer work with the owners of the property as prescribed
by the Subdivision Ordinance.
Mayor Echols stated that the developer worked with the
property owners with the implied information that the City
intended to build the street.
Councilman Ramsey called for point of order. Councilman
Ramsey stated the request had been denied and if someone
wanted to put that in a motion, then make it a formal motion
and get it on the table.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, that
the City Staff help to any degree possible, but basically that
the developer and the land owner in question meet to work out
the easements required, as called for by the Subdivision
Ordinance, within the next two weeks.
Motion carried 5-2; Councilmen Kenna, Fisher, and Mayor Pro
Tem Davis and Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody voting for;
Councilmen Ramsey and Newman voting against.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he would like to depart from the
rules because the parties involved would like to speak if the
Council had no objections.
Councilman Ramsey stated he objected. Councilwoman Moody
objected.
35. Mr. Burgess, Carter and Burgess, Inc., representing Mr. Peskind
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Burgess stated Mr. Peskind owned 62 acres at the northwest
corner of Rufe Snow Road Drive and Loop 820. Mr. Burgess
stated that a traffic investigation had been made and
Mr. Peskind had a proposal for certain street improvements and
new signals in the area. Mr. Burgess stated that Mr. Knight
of Lea, Elliott, McGean and Company was present and he would
like to turn the meeting over to him.
Mr. Knight appeared before the Council.
Mr. Knight stated the purpose of the traffic investigation was
to find a workable means to provide egress and ingress for
this particular development along Rufe Snow. Mr. Knight
stated another point of access is the frontage road of Loop
820. The purpose of the Rufe Snow access would be to allow
the northbound traffic to enter the property from the south as
well as from the north. Mr. Knight stated the first thing
October 8, 1984
Page 13
CONSIDERATION OF
STANLEY PESKIND'S
REQUEST FOR
SIGNALIZATION AND
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ON RUFE SNOW DRIVE
APPROVED
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
they did was the investigation of the existing traffic
conditions between Lewis Road and the intersection of Rufe
Snow Drive and Loop 820. Mr. Knight stated a study was also
made of the signalization of the two traffic signals to see if
a plan could be worked out for a new signal at a location
approximately 450 feet north of the Interstate along Rufe Snow
Drive. Mr. Knight stated that Mr. Peskind proposed that the
signal at Lewis Road and the Interstate be coordinated to
control all signals from one control. Mr. Knight stated that
in addition to the signal improvements it was their feeling
that there should be a dual left turn lane allowed for the
southbound movement to go eastbound on Loop 820. Mr. Knight
stated there were two lanes there now. Mr. Knight stated
their proposal was a new signalized intersection on Rufe Snow
between Interstate 820 and Lewis Drive to provide
ingress/egress to the proposed development. Also Rufe Snow
would be widened on the east side in the vicinity of the new
intersection to provide a left hand turn lane into the
shopping center for northbound traffic on Rufe Snow and to
make the two southbound lanes across the Interstate 820 bridge
both left hand turn lanes onto the eastbound frontage road.
Mayor Echols asked who was going to do the installation and
put it into motion.
Mr. Knight stated that Mr. Peskind would.
Councilman Ramsey asked if Mr. Peskind had any problems with
what the staff had recommended and clear understanding.
Mr. Knight stated there were no problems with the
recommendations.
After further discussion, Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by
Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the request subject to all
City Staff comments.
Motion carried 7-0.
36. Mr. Kenneth LeVan, 8440 Glenann, appeared before the Council.
Mr. LeVan stated he wanted to address the problem of water
leaks. Mr. LeVan stated he was speaking on behalf of the
residents on Sherri Lane. Mr. LeVan stated there had been
several water leaks in the area over the last few months. Mr.
LeVan stated that driveways had been torn up and the street in
some places had caved in after the leaks were repaired. Mr.
LeVan asked if something could be done to help improve the
situation.
October 8, 1984
Page 14
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
Mayor Echols stated he had a report from Gene Riddle
concerning this problem and the leaks were occurring because of
an ongoing problem with cast iron pipe. Mayor Echols stated
another problem was with electrolysis in the ground because it
attacks this particular pipe and causes a gradual deteriora-
tion of the pipe. Mayor Echols stated that, according to Mr.
Riddle's report, all that could be done at this time would be
to continue to repair the leaks until such time that all the
pipe could be replaced. Mayor Echols stated that the problem
with water leaks and deterioration of the cast iron pipe was
not only in Glenann Addition but in several parts of the City.
Mayor Echols thanked Mr. LeVan for coming and sharing his
problem.
Councilwoman Moody thanked Mr. Line and the Staff for putting
the report concerning the water leaks on in lieu of short
notice.
37. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to
adjourn the meeting of October 8, 1984.
Motion carried 7-0.
October 8, 1984
Page 15
ADJOURNMENT
Dan Echols - Mayor
ATTEST:
I Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
I
I
I
I
I
1-
I
I
I
'-
'l
City of j'(órth Richland Hills~ Texas
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
t'
I
TO:
Rodger Line
City Manager
DATE: October 18, 1984
FROM: Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Zoning Cases for City Council October 22, 1984
PZ 84-61 Request of Charles Owen Company for an
appeal hearing to rezone Tract 10D, J.H.
Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, from its
present classification of R-2 (Single
Family) to C-2 (Commercial). This
property is located on the west side of
Davis Boulevard, bounded on the west by
College Hill Addition, and approximately
100 feet north of Ross Road.
PZ 84-72 Request of Jeou Hock Lin for an appeal
hearing to rezone a portion of Lot 2,
Block 13, Snow Heights North Addition,
from its present classification of C-2
(Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of
Alcoholic Beverages. This property is
located on the east side of Rufe Snow
Drive and bounded on the south by
McDonald's Restaurant.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118
ZONING MAP OF NORTH RICHL ND HILLS
I
I
I-
t'
October 18, 1984
7
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Appeal Hearing
PZ 84-61 Zoning request from R-2 (Single Family) to C-2 (Commercial) on
Tract lOD, J.H. Bar10ugh Survey, Abstract 130.
D£PARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
I BACKGROUND: This property is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard, bounded on the
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
west by College Hill Addition, and is approximately 100 feet north of Ross Road.
There were 26 property owners contacted and one spoke in opposition to the request.
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the request by a vote of 3-2 with Mr. Wood and
Mr. Schwinger voting against denial.
The tract of land shown on the map as existing R-2 zoning has been pulled from the
original zoning reque~t. The reason this has been taken out of the request is this tract
has a home that someone wishes to live in and the staff advised the applicant of the
zoning that the home could not be used as a living unit if Commercial zoning is granted.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request.
~~
(!~-4-
BUDCETED lTD!:
YES
110
x
I \
... ,.
I
I-
II
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Page 8 (~
P & Z Minutes
September 13, 1984
(
7.
PZ 84-61
Request of Charles Owen Company to
rezone Tract 10D, J. H. Barlough
Survey, from its present
classification of R-2 (Single Family)
to C-2 (Commercial). This property is
located on the west side of Davis
Boulevard, bounded on the west by
College Hill Addition, and is
approximately 100 feet north of Ross
Road.
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Chuck Owen, 6129 Abbott, came forward
to represent the Charles Owen Company.
He said he lives about two blocks from
this property. He said they have done
residential developement about 100
yards from this site and have done an
Industrial Park on Rufe Snow Drive.
Mr. Owen said there is C-2 zoning
about 300 feet south of this site on
the west side of Davis; 50 acres of
I-I directly across the street; and
several C-2 zoned tracts along Davis
Boulevard to Highway 26. Mr. Owen
said they feel this request is
compatible with the other tracts
around it. He said there is a
carwash, a fence company, excavating
company, and a machine shop.
Mr. Owen said their intention is to
build show room warehouse distribution
which will be landscaped. He said he
felt it would upgrade the area around
it. Mr. Owen said they are the
prospective buyers of the property and
the owner will live adjacent to this
developement.
Jack Roseberry, 8912 Martin Drive,
came forward. He said he owns
property to the south of this property
and he would like to see this request
go through. He said he felt it would
help the area to develop.
I
Page 9
P & Z Minutes
September 13, 1984
C-'
(
I
-
I
I
Mr. Roseberry said his property is
zoned C-2 with 526 feet of road
frontage. He said they need something
to clean up the area and develop it.
I
James Phillips, 7540 Bursey Road, came
forward. He said he owns three pieces
of property to the south of this site
and he felt this would help the area.
I
I
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
I
Jan H. Powell, 6020 Price, came
forward. He said his property joins
this property on the back. Mr. Powell
said he felt this would degrade his
property. He said he bought it
because of the farm atmosphere. Mr.
Powell said he felt with this
development, there would be drainage
problems.
I
Ie
I
Chairman Tucker closed the Public
Hearing.
I
Chairman Tucker said this presents a
real problem. He said it is on a
major thoroughfare, but it backs up to
residential. He said he does not like
C-2 next to residential, there should
be a transition, but Davis Boulevard
is not good for residential.
;1
I
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ
84-61. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger. The motion failed by a
vote of 2-3 with Tucker, Nash, and
Brents voting against.
I
I
I
I-
I
PZ 84-61
DENIED
Ms. Nash made the motion to deny
PZ 84-61. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Brents and the" motion to deny
carried 3-2 with Wood and Schwinger
voting against denial.
Chairman Tucker said he was not
against commercial, but feels there
should be a better plan.
I ......
.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I {I'
I
(
(
. -ì
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
August 29, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 84-61 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM R-2 TO C-2
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 96
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
I1WU/f ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. .
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
August 29, 1984
PZ 84-61
PAGE
1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I~ - ,
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
,Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO. j ~
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-61 the following described property shall
be rezoned from R-2 to C-2.
SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and
being a tract of land in the J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, and being
a portion of that certain tract conveyed to G.R. Montgomery by deeds
recorded in Volume 2457, Pages 411 and 434, of the Deed Records of Tarrant
County, Texas, and said portion being more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron rod for the southwest corner of said Montgomery tract
and the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 33, College Hill Addition, as
shown on plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-131, Page 25, of the Plat
Records of Tarrant County, Texas, in the east line of Lot 7-R, Block 7,
said College Hill Addition, as show on plat in Volume 388-36, Page 78, of
said Plat Records;
THENCE North 0 degrees 22 minutes West with the west line of said
Montgomery tract and with said east line of Block 7, and the east line of
Block 3, said College Hill Addition, as shown on plats in Volume 388-15,
Page 227, and Volume 388-24, Page 21, of said Plat Records, at 179.0 feet
passing the northeast corner of Terry Drive and the southeast corner of Lot
9, in said Block 3, and continuing in all, 452.17 feet;
THENCE South 88 degrees 24 minutes 40 seconds East and parallel with the
south line of that certain tract conveyed to the College Hill Assembly of
God by deed recorded in Volume 4575, Page 151, of said Deed Records, a
distance of 205.0 feet;
THENCE North 0 degrees 22 minutes West and parallel with said west line of
Montgomery tract, 134.96 feet;
THENCE South 88 degrees 24 minutes 40 seconds East and parallel with said
south line of Assembly of God tract, 381.92 feet to the westerly line of
Davis Boulevard (State F.M. Highway 1938);
THENCE South 11 degrees 45 minutes 55 seconds West with said westerly line
of Davis Boulevard, 310.20 feet to an iron rod for the northeast corner of
Lot 3, Block 34, College Hills Addition, as shown on plat in Volume
388-150, Page 96, of said Plat Records;
I~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
THENCE with the northerly lines of said Lot 3, Lot 1 in Block 32, said
College Hills Addition, as shown on plat in Volume 388-23, Page 97, of said
Plat Records, and that certain tract conveyed by Delma Phillips to Louis
Mallernee and wife, Jane E. Mallernee by deed recorded in Volume 5044, Page
432, of said Deed Records, South 85 degrees 23 minutes 40 seconds West,
326.31 feet to an iron rod for the northwest corner of said Mallernee
tract;
THENCE South 0 degrees 02 minutes 45 seconds West with a fence line along
the west line of said Mallernee tract, 141.67 feet to an iron rod set for
the southwest corner of said Mallernee tract in the north line of said Lot
1, Block 33, College Hill Addition;
THENCE South 89 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West with said north line of
Lot 1, Block 33, and with a fence line along the south line of said
Montgomery tract, 173.93 feet to the place of beginning and containing
5.258 acres (229,054 square feet.
This property is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard, bounded on
the west by College Hill Addition, and is approximately 100 feet north of
Ross Road.
DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF SEPTEMBER,
1984.
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-84-61 IS HEREBY REZONED
THIS DAY OF , 1984..
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I'
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
DATE: October 18 ~ 1984
Appeal Hearing
SUBJECT: PZ 84-72 Zoning Request from C-2 (Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of
Alcoholic Beverages on a portion of Lot 2, Blk. 13, Snow Heights North Addn.
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive, bounded on the
south by McDonald's restaurant.
There was only one property owner contacted, but two in the audience spoke in opposition.
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the request by a vote of 3-2 with Chairman
Tucker and Ms. Nash voting against denial.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIR.ED: Approval or denial of request.
...2/~ ~~-, ý-
IUDGETED ITÐf:
YES
110 X
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
Page 25
P & Z Minutes
September 13, 1984
r
(
PZ 84-71
WITHDRAWN
19. PZ 84-72
(
Mr. Evans asked if they could
both requests and come b
Planned Developme
they could.
Schwinger withdrew his motion and
Nash withdrew her second.
Mr. Evans withdrew both cases.
Request of Jeou Hock Lin to rezone a
portion of Lot 2, Block 13, Snow
Heights North Addition, from its
present classification of C-2
(Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale
of Alcoholic Beverages. This property
is located on the east side of Rufe
Snow Drive, bounded on the south by
McDonald's Restaurant.
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Sam Lin came forward. He said they
want to put in a high-class Chinese
Restaurant.
Chairman Tucker asked in whose name
the Specific U~e would be put.
Mr. Lin said Jeou Hock Lin.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
Bill Mabry, 7524 Bursey Road, came
forward. He said ·he was in opposition
to this request. He said he thinks
the area caters to the high school.
Mr. Mabry said he was a reformed
alcoholic and on Christian principles,
he was against the request.
I"
Page 26
P & Z Minutes
September 13, 1984
í
~
(
Ie
I
I
Adene Jones, 7512 Bursey Road, came
forward. She said she also objects to
this request to sale alcoholic
beverages for Christian principles.
She said alcohol is too easy for young
people to purchase and the restaurant
will be too close to the high school.
I
I
Chairman Tucker closed the Public
Hearing.
I
Chairman Tucker said legally, this
Commission has no control over
granting this request because there
are others in the area. He said the
county granted the wet area, not the
city. Chairman Tucker said the State
Law is very specific regarding
distance to schools and churches.
I
I
Ie
PZ 84-72
Drnrrn
Mr. Wood made the motion to deny
PZ 84-72. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny
carried 3-2 with Tucker and Nash
voting against denial.
I
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:55 P. M.
I
I
Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission
I
Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission
I
I
I
Ie
I
If
,
f
I
1e
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
ill
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
August 29, 1984
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 84-72 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM C-2 TO C-2-SU-ALCHOL.
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 121
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
~ C2a.-:-
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
August 29, 1984
PZ 84-72
PAGE
1
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I 1),.
,
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
P2 g¢-?::l-
EXHIBIT uAu
SPECIFIC USE PERMIT
BEING a 0.0758 acre tract situated in Lot 2t Block 13t Snow Heights North
Additiont an addition to the City of North Richland Hillst Tarrant County,
Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-164, Page 38, Plat Records of Tarrant
CountYt Texast situated in the W. W. Wallace SurveYt Abstract No. 1606t said
0.0758 acre tract also being the most easterly portion of Building "B"t and
being more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at a 1/2 inch iron rod at the point of intersection of the south
R.O.W. line of Lewis Drive (60 foot R.O.W.) and the east R.O.W. line of Rufe
Snow Road (120 foot R.O.W.);
THENCE S 00°26100" W along said east R.O.W. line of Rufe Snow Road (120 foot
R.O.W.) for a distance of 523.16 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE S 89°34'00" E departing from said east R.O.W. line for a distance of
78.33 feet to the northwest corner of the aforementioned Building "B";
THENCE S 89°34'00" E along the north face of said Building "B" for a distance
of 144.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 89°3410011 E continuing along the said north face of Building "B" for
a distance of 55.00 feet to a point for cornert said point being the
northeast corner of Building IIB";
THENCE S 00°26'00" W along the east face of said Building "B" for a distance
of 60.00 feet to a point for corner, said point being the most easterly
southeast corner of Buildìng "B";
THENCE N 89°34100" W along the south face of said Building "B" for a distance
of 55.00 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE N 00°26'00" E for a distance of 60.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
and CONTAINING 3,300 square feet or 0.0758 acres..
I ~ +
t
I'
e
I
I
I
Q
I c
0
II:
I ~
0
Z
tn
I w
u.
::)
&I: (JI
I N
~
en_
-lie
I
I
I
I
I
I
LEWIS DRIVE
POINT OF COMMENCING
LOT 2
POINT OF BEG INNING
'CJ)
78. 38-'-
S 89° 3400" E
55 .00'
144.85 '
BLDG.B
3300 S.F. 8
. 0
~ ~0.0758 AC. ~
o 0 ( ) 0-
U) 0 0:
Z 01 ~
o
55.00'
N 89° 34 'od'w
I EXHIBIT A .
ePECIFICÙSE PERMIT .
I LOT 2, BLOCK 13,SNOW HEIG"HTS NORTH ADDITION,
CAMBRIDGE CO.MPANIES
14850 WESTGROVE, SUITE 120
DALLAS, TEXAS
("'~I
IInìJ
SCALE: ,": 40'
([@]) GIaham As8odatøs, Œ.
CC»8.1.J1tÐ eø.EERS & PlNN:RS
I'
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORD INANCE NO.
1 I ~ltO
\.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-84-72 the following described property shall
be rezoned from C-2 to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.
BEING a 0.0758 acre tract situated in Lot 2, Block 13, Snow Heights North
Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills. Tarrant County,
Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-164, Page 38, Plat Records of Tarrant
County, Texas, situated in the W.W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, said
0.0758 acre tract also being the most easterly portion of Building liB", and
being more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at a 1/2 inch iron rod at the point of intersection of the south
R.O.W. line of Lewis Drive (60 foot R.O.W.) and the east R.O.W. line of
Rufe Snow Road (120 foot R.O.W.);
THENCE South 00 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds West along said east R.O.W.
line of Rufe Snow Road (120 foot R.O.W.) for a distance of 523.16 feet to a
point for corner;
THENCE South 89 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds East departing from said east
R.O.W. line for a distance of 78.33 feet to the northwest corner of the
aforementioned Building "B";
THENCE South 89 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds East along the north face of
said Building "B" for a distance of 144.85 feet to the point of beginning;
THENCE South 89 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds East continuing along the
said north face of Building "B" for a distance of 55.00 feet to a point for
corner, said point being the northeast corner of Building "B";
THENCE South 00 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds West along the east face of
said Building "B" for a distance of 60.00 feet to a point for corner, said
point being the most easterly southeast corner of Building "B";
THENCE North 89 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds West along the south face of
said Building "B" for a distance of 55.00 feet to a point for corner;
I-
II
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
THENCE North 00 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds East for a distance of 60.00
feet to the point of beginning and containing 3,300 square feet or 0.0758
acres of lane.
This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive and bounded
on the south by McDonald's restaurant.
DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF SEPTEMBER,
1984.
&~ C ~Y"'
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
S?tJ~=:D §i c~~
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-84-72 IS HEREBY REZONED
THIS
DAY OF
, 1984.
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
"
I ~';
\
"'f
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND:
DATE:
II
10/22/84
Request Prom "Onstage"/Trinity Arts Foundation for
Financia Support
Administl ation
assistance in an effcrt to bring live theatre to the Mid-Cities area. The
The attached request from the subject organization seeks the City's
City of Bedford has contributed a building to house this activity, and other
area cities are being asked to assist in its refurbishing.
The Promotional Fund, supported by the Hotel/Motel Tax, has a
contingency allowance sufficient to participate in this worthwhile program,
and it is a legally permitted use of such funds. While the request is for
$10,000, the sum of $1,000 would seem to be more proportionate to the City's
level of support of o~her community activities.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUI~ED:
It is recommended that the City Council appropriate
$4,000 from the Promot"onal Fund Contingency Account to sUPPort the "Onstaqe"
Program
BUDGETED ITE~I:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES X
NO
1.-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ONSTAGE
608 Huntwich Drive
Bedford, Texas 76021
."
September 16, 1984
James Ramsey
4604 Lariat Trail
Fort Worth, Texas 76118
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
The possibility of bringing Community Theatre to the mid-cities
area is now becoming a realization. As you know, Pat Sodd, Bernadette
Sodd, and myself have been working for three years to bring theatre
(adult and children's) to the mid-cities area. We 'now have the
opportunity to do so. To accomplish this we are seeking community
support. We have formed a new theatrical company called "ONSTAGE"
and we are in need of virtually everything. The Trinity Arts
Foundation is providing us with a building which is located at the
Bedford Boys Ranch directly across the street from the Trinity Arts
Center. We must, however, convert the building from its present
configuration to a theatre. We estimate a figure of $75,000 _
$100,000 for the total conversion. I am requesting a donation in
the amount of $10,000 which would be a wonderful start but I
would appreciate anything you could provide us.
I would like to provide you with the following information
about our drama club "ONSTAGE":
Purpose; To stimulate an interest in theatre in the mid-cities
area; to provide an opportunity for people in the area
to participate in the performing arts; to produce adult
and children's theatre; to conduct workshops in all areas
of the theatre including acting, lighting, sound, stage
managing, etc.
Organization: "ONSTAGE" is affiliated with the Trinity Arts Foundation
and will function under their non-profit tax
umbrella. (see attachments)
Officers: President: Justin Paul Vigiletti
Vice-President: Pat Sodd
Secretary: Bernadette Sodd
Treasurer: Robert Balentine
Membership: We have 38 members and growing.
I~
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
page 2
Purpose for Funds: We need stage lighting, sound, curtains, seats,
air-conditioning/heating, proper bathrooms, etc.
Income: We cannot anticipate any income other than membership
dues until renovation is completed and play productions
have begun.
"ONSTAGE" is an enthusiastic community dr:ama club ready and
willing to bring theatre to the mid-cities area. I hope you can
help. If you should require additional information, feel free
to contact me at the above address or by telephone, 817-485-7417.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I The Trinity Arts Foundation, dba Trinity Arts Council (March, 1983). strives
to meet the goals set be annual community Arts Brainstorm Sessions. As
additional funding becomes available and the community's committment grows,
I~he Trinity Arts Foundation/Council is growing to meet the needs of the
~id-Cities in the visual and performing arts·for youth and adults.
Initially a visual arts organization, the Trinity Arts Foundation/Council
now also encompasses music, drama, dance and the humanities, including
history, etc. Special programs and arts classes for children and young
adults, both average and exceptional, have long been part of the Trinity
Arts Foundation's schedule. The first class for physically and mentally
exceptional children Was in 1978. 7he Annual Art Competition initiated
I by the l~rts Guild is now run b~7 the Foundation. In 1979 the '!".;P's firs:.,
4IÞfund-raising A~~ual Art Auction was sponsored by local banks. :he firsT
Renaissance, co~~unity Arts Fair was held in 1960, with a second Fair i~
1981, in Bedford Boys Ranch Park in an effort to brin£ the arts to thE
commun~ty. In '82 and '8) the Heritage Art Festival Was held in a local reall.
In 1980 the Music program Was initiated and then the Sonata Club, a 20
year old music organization and the Young ~usicians Club joined as affiliates.
Seve~al music classes are now available. The D/F~ Civic Orchestra, another
affiliate, is an outgrowth of the Trinity Arts Foundation Orchestra, bEgun
by volunteers i~ 1980. The Foundation held it's first Amateur Arts & Craft
Competition in 1981. TAF also sponsored the Wid-Cities Photohraphy Cor.-
petit ion and Exhi bi t wi th the cooperation of the :'rini ty Arts Guild in 1981.
The Trinity Arts Photography Club came into being shortly thereafter. A
complete dark-room is now available. The Drama department Was initiated in
late 1980 spawning a dr~~a club, the Trinity Players, another affiliate.
A children's theater group now performs on occasion at a local mall through
the Trinity Players. Acting workshops are available. Several Dance classes
began in the Fall of 1981, to an enthusiastic reception. A wide variety
of visual arts classes and special workshops are available at the Trinity
Arts Center. The D/Fw Writers Club is now an active affiliate hOlding
writint classes and regular workshops. They also are hosting a book review
and discussion group called 'Book Talk' for the community.
I ':
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AN ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY - ~RINITY ARTS FOUNDATION/COUNCIL
The Trinity Arts Foundatior." accredited by the I.R.S. in March, 1978,
as non-profit and tax exeæpt, was an outgrowth e,f the Trinity Arts Guild,
which origin~ ted if' l'oiay, 1961. TtJE Guild had several temporary [¡c!"!u: in
thE ~id-Citie£ srea, eventually settling in a Soundly b~ilt, but l2dly
vandalizeQ, building in 13eèford Boys Ranch Park, in Fet.uary, ]975. Lïth
a long;"'term lease \f;jth the City of Bedford Ðnd the Guild's SlO,OCC Euild-
ing Fund, extensive renovation of the ground floor of the two story,
:former boys' dormi tory, W".s undertaken. Evertually thE Founë:ati on a ssur!";eè
the renovatio~ efforts on both floor~. The area of the struc~ure is abou:.
7800 square feet. Downstairs one large and one small classroom are in use,
as well as bathrooms, maintenance and storage area, Space for an office,
plus a large meeting room/Art Gallery. Upstairs are a pottery roo~, ycut~
classroom, two nearly refurbished classoooms, plus a newly re-surfacej
dance room; an area for a photography dark room and another unfinished
classroom. Much of the work Was done by volunteer labor, with sc~e pro-
fessional help financed by funj~raising projects over the years.
I
. , j
/
I
DATE:
October 22, 1984
I
_UBJECT:
I
Self-Propelled St iping Machine
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
I
BACKGROUND:
On October 8, 198
at 10:00 A.M. bids for the above mentioned equipment
I
were opened and are outlined elow.
I
. 'Martin Equipment
o
AMOUNT
No Response
No Response
No Response
No Response
No Response
No Response
$28',200.00
I
VENDOR EXCEPTIONS
I
1. Minton Equipment
2. Little Manufacturing
3. Shields Industrial Supply
4. Well Machine & Supply
5. Minton Machinery
6. Fitch Industrial
I
I
I
Vendors 1 thru 6 all make r represent companys that sell Line Markers. Each
I
of the above manufacturers except Martin Equipment are unable to comply with
Section 19, 20~ and 21 of ur specifications. They are written in this manner
I
to enable us to have one p ece of equipment that will preform all our striping
needs, (2 color striping, 2 lane, 4 lane, reflective beads~ skip painting and
II heated paint for cold weat er application) thus eliminating a need for more than
I
one striping machine.
The list price or suggeste retail on this equipment is $33,000.00 less $4,800.00
I
represent our discounted p ice of $28,200.00.
I
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove the purchase of one Striping Machine
from Martin E ui ment in
amount of $28,200.00.
I
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES X
I
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
01-60-02-64 0
I
I
.1' of the Metroplex
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
. INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
.. VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: "'"
I MARTIN EQUIPMENT COMPANY Request For: Line Marker
P.O. BOX 20338
DALLAS, TEXAS 75220 Bid Opening Date: October 8, 1984 At 10:00 A.M.
I Date:
Requisition No.
Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 A.M. OC~8~er 8,1984
City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18
~TEM PHONE: (214) 556-0910 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: John Whitne'V Phone: (R 1 7) ? R 1 ·()O111
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
11 Line Marker Brand Mnr1øl 1 Each
t MARK-RITE BY UNIMASCO. INC. 10..000 1 Each $28.200.00 $28.200.00
¡
J
¡
I
!
.
.
I
SUB-TOT AL
ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID $28,200.0Q)
'ERMS NET % 30 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH
ICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 60-90 DAYS FROM
ECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
irapt. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
II.r to award purchases on an individual item basIs when in its
est interests. All SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXClUD-
o FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
NORTH RICHlANO HillS, TEXAS.
I
IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC·
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR-
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH·
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSt·
TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT.
COMPANY: ___---.MARTIN EQUIPMENT ~OMPANY ----
BY: ----.- C A M~SFIELD
PHONE NUMBER: ( 0
SIGNATUREe.O..IH~~ATE: ~-ð'.y
TH IS IS NOT A PURCHASE OR DE R
I This Specification Is Intended To Outline The Minimum Requirements For
~ne (1) Line Marker, Self-propelled. (Equal To Or Exceeding Mark-Rite
.odel 10,000)
II
I
I
I
I
I
I 10. Brakes: Rear/Hydraulic
11. Brakes: Front/Disc
1~3.. Parking Brake: Standard Automotive
~ Steering: standard Automotive
I 14. Operators Seat: Padded W/Back Rest Covered With Weather
Resistant Material/Seat Belt
15.
116.
117.
18.
119.
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I .
1. Engine: Shall Have A Minimum Horse Power of 60
2. Engine: Shall Be Water Cooled Type
3. Engine: Shall Be Electric Start 12 Volt System
4. Compressor: Two Cylinder, Single Stage, Air Cooled With
A Minimum of 60 CFM Displacement
5. Wheel Base: A Minimum Of 100 Inches
6.
7.
8 .
9.
Transmission: 3 Speed Forward, 1 Speed Reverse
Clutch: Heavy Duty Automotive Type
Rear Axel & Differential: Minimum 5,000 Lb. Capacity
Front Axel:Standard Truck Type Square Beam With Adjustable
Tie Rods
Check
Compliance
Yes No
v
¡/
V
~
Drivers Compartment: Covered To Protect Operator & Controls
Paint Tank: Two (2) 60 Gallon ASME Approved, Pressure Tested
Each Equipped With Drain Valve, Air Release Valve, Safty
Valve and Air Motor To Drive Paint Agitators'
Paint/Air Hose Fittings: Standard Pipe Thread
Flushing System: Shall Be Operated From Drivers. Seat and
Capable of Flushing Paint Lines, Filters and Guns
Spray Guns: Three Electric/Air Operated Internal Atomizing
Guns, Capable Of Handling All Standard Road Marking Material.
Each Gun Is To Be Equipped With Paint Filter. Guns Are To Be
Mounted To Swing Upward If Struck By A Solid Object To Prevent
Damage To Guns And/Or Mounts. Spray Tubes To Be Rigidly Mounted
On Guns To Insure Consistent Clean Edged Lines. Line Width /
To Be Varible Between 2 and 6 Inches. V
20.
Skip Line Control: Solid State Electronic, Adjustable In 1/10
of 1 Foot Increments Through The Use Of Dials Mounted In The
Operators Compartment. Overall Paint Length and Overall Skip
Length Must Be Adjustable Up To 199 Feet Overall, And Be
Equipped With Selector Switch To Choose On Or Spray Off As
First Portion Of Cycle. Automatically Resets To Zero Posi-
tion When Intermittent Lines Are Not Being Applied. Advance
and Retard In 2/10 Of 1 Foot Increments. All Connections To
Be Electrical.
~
~
/
e
II .
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
re
I
21.Controls: All Gun Control Switches, Skip Line
Control Switches, Air Pressure Regulators, and
Pressure Guages To Be Located On A Panel Within
Reach Of Operator From Inside Operators Compartment.
All Pressure Regulators Shall Be Self-Relieving
To Allow Downward Pressure Adjustment, Without
Use Of Additional Valves.
22. Line Guide: Retractable A Frame Type, Adjustable
Laterally.
23. Engine Cover: Completely Enclosed Engine And
Compressor With Hinged Access Panels.
24. Bead Dispenser And Hopper: Electric/Air Operated
Gravity Fed Adjustable Bead Flow Capable Of
Dispensing Beads On Either 4 Or 6 Inch Lines.
25. Lights: Head Lights, Tail/Brake Lights, Turn Signals
and Rotating Blue Flasher Mounted On Top Of Canopy.
26. Tow Bar: Standard Ball Socket Trailer Hitch
27. Paint Heater: Both Tanks
28. Restriping Device: Photo Electric Solid State
CHECK
COMPLIANCE
YES NO
1 I
/1
\
Vi
~\
I
V
,/
/
/
~
II.
1. Warranty Offered: Parts 9"e Ye.Q r Labor tb ~H-r/S
2. Parts Avaible At ¿~.r~.d E?h ,; 47 /ÞJ~n'~ ~,,*~H V-
I' , /
III.
1. Vendor Will Be Required To Furnish One (1) Each Maintenance
Manual With Line Marker.
2. Vendor Will Be Required To Furnish 8 Hours Öf Training and
Maintenance Orientation At Time Of Delivery.
3. Vendor Certifies That Delivery Will Be No Longer Than
60-.9tJ Days.
I
I
It The undersigned here by offers to sell to the City of North
I Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this
proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any
other conditions that may be attached and further certify that
lour attached proposal submi tted by r A MANSFT'RT.n
complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of
North Richland Hills bid specification, be it further specified
that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills
I specifications is to be outlined in. detail stating said vendors
~ exceptlons.
I
I
I
I
lilt
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills
acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the
expressed understanding that the city of North Richland Hills
has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or
any part there of.
e. a. /;?/~
Signed
SALESMAN
Title
OCTOBER R} ,QAL..
Date
MARTIN EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Company Name
THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION
I
1--'\, '
'e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
Ie
I ~ - ..:' ..J'''.-,. ? ·.i ..'-
~ I / " , ..
ONE YEAR LIMITED
LINE STRIPER WARR.ANTY
Unimasco Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Manufacturer", warrants each new
line striper sold by the Manufacturer to be free from defects in material and
workmanship, under normal use and service, for a period of twelve (12) months
from the date of shipment from Manufactùrer's factory. The liability of the
Manufacturer is limited to replacing, repairing, or issuing credit (at the Manu-
facturer's option) for any line striper at a point designated by the Manufacturer.
At no time shall a defective component be returned without prior written con-
sent from the Manufacturer. This warranty does not obligate the Manufacturer
to bear any transportation charges in connection with the replacement or repair
of def~ctive parts.
This warranty shall not apply to any line striper which has been installed or
operated in a manner not recommended by the Manufacturer, nor to any line
striper which has been repaired, altered, neglected, or used in any way which
in the Manufacturer's opinion, adversely affects ifs performance, nor to any line
striper in which parts not manufactured or approved by the Manufacturer have been
used, nor to any accessories installed on the line striper where the accessory manu-
facturer has its own warranty, not to normal maintenance services or replacement
of normal service items.
. .
Manufacturer reserves the right to modify, alter and improve any line striper or
parts without incurring any obligation to replace any line striper or parts previously
sold with or without such modified, altered, or improved line striper or parts.
The Manufacturer is in no event liable to loss of use, loss of time, wages paid,
inconvenience, loss of profit, expenditures, travel or lodging.
\,
THIS WARRANTY, AND THE MANUFACTURER!S OBLIGATION HEREUNDER, IS IN
LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, IN-
CLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ..and all other obligations or liabilities including special or
consequential damages or contingent liabilities arising tout of the failure of any line
striper or part to operate properly. No person is authorized to give any oth.r WQmlnty
or to aaau"" any addltronal'ohllgåtlan an the Manufacturer', b.half unl.u mad. In
writing and signed by an officer of the Manufacturer.
-
aJ'rmBI.IUDáD.C3CCCID9 Brma::
Telephone: ~ 13-/J21-332i!
l!;~.U Sn: San Pl'drn Strl'p.t (nn Airline.Way)
P. O. Boz 2105
Gardena. California 9n21,7
Form
1287
I
.
DATE:
October 22, 1984
I e SUBJECT:
I
I
Partitioning for the Municipal Complex
DEPARTMENT:
Purchasing
BACKGROUND:
On Monday, Octoèer 15, 1984 at 10:00 A.M. bids for the above mentioned
item were opened and are outlined below.
I
I
VENDOR
EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT
(Vendor Submitted 3 Proposals)
2 $33,908.00
3 32,589.00
1 33,908.00
1 30,412.20
2 30,261.01
0 20,000.00
Southwest Office Systems
I
A.
B.
I
C.
I
Ie
I
East Side Office Supply
Team II Office Systems
* General Office Supply
This expenditure will be used for reorganization of the Secretarial pool, Inspections,
I
Permits, Planning and Zoning and afford a more business like atmosphere and contained
work areas, handle additional personnel and employee work load.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove the purchase of Partitioning
from General Office Supply in the amount of $20.000.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES X N:>
01-20-05-6200
cJ¿~
,IA ~.A .-'"
(j '-7/
BUDGETED ITEM:
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
1.
WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
non consideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which non consideration is properly requested may be returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2.
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3.
IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced value of any items.
(d) Where the bidder. any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
I 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
s.
DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6.
AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
7. ASSIGNMENT
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8. NOTICE OF DELAYS
(This clause is applicable only \"hen a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
(a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I·
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
.
MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASE
1. Delivery shall be to the location identified on the purchase order within
the City of North Richland Hills.
2. The contract will be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications at
the price bid.
3. In the event of partial shipments or multiple deliveries, the quantities
shown on the bid are estimated quantities only. The City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to purchase more than or less than the
quantities shown. In any event, the unit bid prices shall govern.
4. Bidder warrants that all deliveries made under the contract will be of the
type and quality specified; and the City of North Richland Hills
Purchasing Agent may reject and/or refuse any delivery which falls below
the quality specified in the specifications. The City of North Richland
Hills shall not be held to have accepted any delivery until after an
inspection of same has been made and an opportunity to exercise its right
of rejection has been afforded.
5. All manufacturers' warranties shall inure to the benefit of the City of
North Richland Hills, and replacement of-defective materials shall be made
promptly upon request. ·
6. Failure by the contractor to make reasonable delivery as and when requested
shall entitle the Purchasing Agent to acquire quantities from alterna~e
sources wherever available, with the right to seek reimbursement from the
contractor for amounts, if any, paid by the City of North Richland Hills
over and above the bid price.
7. All materials delivered shall be free of any and all liens and shall upon
acceptance thereof become the property of the City of North Richland Hills
free and clear of any materialman"s, supplier's, or other type liens.
8. Regardless of the award of a contract hereunder, the City of North Richland
Hills retains the right to purchase the same or similar materials or items
from other sources should it be determined that doing so would be in the
City's best interest, based on cost and quality considerations; however, in
such event, the contractor will be given the first option of meeting or
rejecting the proposed alternate source's lower price or higher quality.
9. Acceptance by the City of North Richland Hills of any delivery shall not
relieve the contractor of any guarantee or warranty, express or implied,
nor shall it be considered an acceptance of material not in accordance with
the specifications thereby waiving the City's right to request replacement
of defective material.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
These Specificaitons Are Intended To Describe The Minimum
Specifications For Paneling For The Municipal Complex.
Section I
72" High Partitions
Fabric Covered (Color To Be Chosen From Low Bidder)
Acoustics: Minimum .80 NRC, STC 20
Fire Rating: Class A
Hardware: All Hardware Shall Be Included
Electric: As Specified In Blueprint, And Shall Meet NEMA Standard
And Rated 125 V 15 AMP
Panel Construction: 2" Thick Fiberglass Core Consisting Of Two
Pieces Of 1" Thick High Density Fiberglass With An
Aluminum Foil Septum. Frames Are 2" Wide Extruded
Structural Aluminum. All Fabric Surfaces Are Fully
Tackable.
Frame Finish: Painted ( Color To Be Chosen From Low Bidder)
Sloting: All Panels Shall Be Slotted For Present And Future
Addition Of Accessories.
Section II
42" High Partitions With Counter Top
42" High Partitions: Same As Specification For 72"
Counter Top: 1" Thick Surfaced With High Pressure Laminate and Edged
With Durable T-Molding/With All Hardware. Per Blueprint
Color Oak
Section III
72" Glass Partition
Clear Full Vision 72" High 3/16" Thick Triple Strength Tempered
Glass For Straight Panel and 3/16" Thick Plexiglass. for
Curved Panels.
Electrical And Hardware: Same As Specificed In Section I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
Section IV
Doors
Color Oak, Per Blueprint and Shall Include All Hardware, All
Door Jams To Match Panel Frame.
Section V
Work Surface
Work Surface: 1~" Thick For Added Strength and Surfaced On Top
Front ang Sides With High Pressure Laminate Finish.
Full 180 , 5/8 Radius Forward Edge For Added Comfort
Plus Flat, Self-Edged Back and Sides For A Flush
Fit Adjoining Surfaces (With Support Brackets)
Work Surface Shall Be Grooved Back Type For Easy Installation
Or Removal From Notched Panels.
Color: Oak
Section VI
Vendor Shall Be Responsible For Complete 100% Turn Key Delivery
and Installation.
Vendor Shall Install All Equipment and Paneling On A Pre Arranged Date
And Shall Be Done In Its Entirety On Friday, Saturday and Sunday
Of The Pre Arranged Time. All Work Is To Start After 5:00 P.M.
of The Friday and Be Completed By 12:00 Noon On Sunday.
The Area Of Installation Shall Be Free Of Any Furniture and
Obstacles (Responsibility of City of North Richland Hills)
And Ready For Installation.
All Items Bid Must Be Available On A Quick Ship Program At The
Time Of Bid Opening and For Future Purchases.
Vendor Shall Be Responsible For Storage Until Complete Order Is
Recieved and Ready For Installation.
It Shall Be The Vendors Responsibility To Insure That All Equipment
Hardware, Electrical, Doors, Counter Tops, To Complete The Project
As Per The Blueprint Are Included In Their Bid.
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS
~~ tJ9lc;E ~¢#/;Y
jtJrJ. f?· /í/7/d/
¡Jt7;l?¿ 1) ttf £/J S
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fI
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
Request For: Partitioning for the Municipal Complex
Bid Opening Date: October 15, 1984 At 10:00 A.M.
Date:
Requislt~onNo. . . 10:00 A.M. October 15,1984
Sealed bids will be received until
City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: John Whitney Phone: (817) 281-0041
Terms / % ~ Days, F.O.B. City of North Richland
Hills: Delivery I~- g ~S, 9a:;¡;¡ From Receipt Of Order.
The City of North Richla d Hills Purchasing Department reserves the
right to reject any and all bids, waive formal1ties, or to award
purchases on an individual basis when in its best interest. All
sales and use Taxes to be excluded from bid. Prices to be quoted
F.O.B. City of North Richland Hills.
~~Á ~/c: here by agre~ sell to the City
of North Richland Hills in the amount of '6 £l:7t7 _ /"/tJ
the equipment with complete installation as pel filueprint and
specifications.
J'1~
Witnessed
Title
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
c
DATE:
10/22/85
SUBJECT:
RatificatiDn of Purchase
DEPARTMENT: Purchasing
BACKGROUND: All data p"'ocessing equipment in the City is now IBM in order to
insure compatibility.
Approved i~ the 1984-85 operating budget is the purchase of one 256K
Memory Displaywriter, Dlskette Unit and Printer. This system will be used
primarily by the Financ~~ Department in budget preparation and reports.
IBM was contacted for pricing and availability and during the
negotiations the equipm~nt was inadvertently placed on order. Since the purchase
of this equipment will be in excess of $5,000 council action is required. Rather
than cancel the equipme11t and then try to purchase the equipment as a sole source
item to be compatible w th our present equipment we are asking Council to ratify
the purchase in the amo\nt of $9,102.50.
Our budgetEd amount is $11,040. However since the time of budget
preparation municipal gevernments are being offered the State discount (30%).
Therefore our price is ~9,102.50.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
and Printer
Ratify purchase of IBM Displaywriter, Diskette Unit
BUDGETED ITEM: YES
ACCOUNT Nm-mER:
x
NO
I'
,I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~"
To: Mayor Echols, the City Staff, Council members.
Re: Request for time extension before decision on motion for
City participation for improvements on Hightower Drive.
~~~
1!r. ~layor:
We are asking for a continuance of time for action on our
negotiations with Quadrangle Pevelopment until January 15,
1985, based on these criteria:
A. In conversation with our attorney to Mr. Wayne Hagood,
~1AI (1!aster Appraisal Inst i tu te é:ert if ied), it was as-
certained that he had the proper credentials to correctly
advise us upon:
1. the fee simple market value of the subject whole
property
2. the estimated value of the part proposed to be
t a~{en
3. the damages, arising out of the taking
~!r. Hagood related that due to the intense thoroughness
of his investigative work and his previous cornmittments
he would be unavailable to begin his work for us until
~.!id-December, 1984.
(a) We feel that since the Ordinance has been in exist-
ance for some time, a developer of a project of this
magnitude should have been aware of it when the por-
ject was proposed.
(b) We feel that since the developer has claimed no know-
ledge of the Ordinance until recently, and since in
open council meeting, October 8, 1984, one person of
of the council admitted not knowing of the Ordinance,
the City staff should have made the wording of the
Ordinance very 'clear to Planning and Zoning, the
developers and the city council so that this matter
would not have come to the current stressful impasse.
(c) We feel that since the Ordinance was available long ago
and should have been acted upon long ago, and wasn't,
we have been afforded scant time proportionately
(2 weeks) to arrive at such a momentous decision.
Cd) We feel that we have the right to obtain the best
possible credentialed person to assist us in formula-
ting our response since neither of us possess any
expertise pertaining to the matter.
(e) To demonstrate to the staff and council that we have
not been derelict in our attempts to obtain expertise
we further submit:
1. A letter from one Judy Rohrer, R.M. (note she is not
~1AI credentialed) stating that she would be un-
available until late November.
1-·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
2. Telephone responses from these listed below,
Thomas S. Hanes, MAl - available January 1985
Rick Tankersley, RM - available last of November 1984
Ben Loughry, Real Estate ,appraiser - available 45 days
B. We feel that since Mr. Elliott, (Mr. Pasteur was never re-
vealed to us as the developer until 6:40 PM Oct. 8, 1984)
related time and again to us in mid-summer (14 weeks ago)
that he had been made aware of the Ordinance, and no offer
was made, we have a right to expect a 14 week comparable
time period.
c. We feel that since Mr. Pasteur in a telephone conversation
to both of us at 9:00 PM Tuesday night October 9, 1984,
said that he and Mr. Elliott had been advised in a meeting
at least three weeks prior to the October 8 council meeting,
by the city staff not to make us an offer until after the
council's meeting, we have a right to a continuance.
D. We feel that since four (4) days of the fourteen (14) were
weekend days when official records were unavailable to us
for our use, we have had inadequate time to obtain even pre-
liminary pertinent data.
E. We feel that since our attorney, due to his prearranged
schedule was out of town and unavailable to us for four days,
we have not been allowed even courtesy time to obtain counsel.
F. We feel that since no consideration was made of our work
schedules (see attached letter from the Dean of the Nursing
School at UTA and John had work previously scheduled for the
given 2 weeks) and since we, as individuals, do not have a
staff of any size to do the necessary leg-work to obtain
essential information, we have a right to consideration of
our career-related responsibilities now.
G. We feel that since we did not receive any offer until late
Friday night, October 14, we have a right to negotiating--
time.
H. We have been diligent in our attempts to contact council
members to explain our perceptions of the events surrounding
this issue. Some of them have been out of town or had work-
hour conflicts with ours. There has been insufficient time to
provide them with information which would enhance their under-
standing of this problem.
I-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I. Mr. Parker, a newly diagnosed diabetic-hypertensive, had just
acquired some measure of control over his chronic disease.
He has had, related to the stress of this entire situation,
a real set-back in his health status. We have had to' divert
a major portion of our energies to re-establishing control
over this potential threatening condition. Since none of
us function at peak efficiency when we ar~ ill, we feel we
have a legitimate request for time to help restab1lize his
status.
We want to reassure the Mayor, the city manager, staff and council
members that we do not want to impede the progress and development
of North Richland Hills. We are willing, and have been, to
negotiate in this matter. We are unwilling to negotiate from an
unfair vantage point.
JCP/cmm
Enclosures
cc: Terry Gardner, Attorney at Law
I' ·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Rohrer & Associates, Inc.
Real Estate Appraisers · Consultants
October 12, 1984.
Mr. John Parker
P. O. Box 80082
. Fort Worth, Texas 76180
Re: One acre, more or less
w/S Smithfield Road
.
~'f~
.,
Dear Mr. Parker:
As per our telephone conversation.regdrding the above captioned
property, our firm is prepared to do a full narrative appraisal
report on the proper·ty. The purpose of this appraisal will be:
(1) to estimate the fee simple market value of the
subject whole property;
(2) to estimate the value of the part proposed to be
taken;
(3) estimate the damages, if any, arising out of the
taking.
AIl'values as of date of inspection.
As with most area appraisers, I am currently back logged with
work and I will be unable to commence work on this project
until November. Except for unforeseen and unavoidable cir-
cumstances I delivery of the final report shou.ld be no later
than November 23, 1984. .
We look forward to working with you, and if you have any
additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.~_
Sincerely,
/J/v2vv
. .
JR/ksw
P.O. Box 13902
Arlington, Texas 76094
(817~ 861·8100
1-·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ill
The
University of Texas
at
Arlington
IohooI of Nunling
P.O. Box 18407
Artington. Tex.. 78018
Metro 273-2771
October 15, 1984
Mayor Dan Echols
Richland Hills City Hall
3201 Diana Drive
Fort Worth, Texas 76118
Dear Mayor Echols:
I wish to express my concern ~egarding the present stressful
situation regarding Dorothy Parker's home. Her position as
Specialist 'on the' faculty ,of the School of Nursing requires
clinical supervision of begtnning students in a hospital sit-
uation. It is necessary for her to devote her total attention
to this critical responsibility. The clinical assignments be-
gin the week of October 22, 1984.
Sincerely,
~¿f''tP~
Myrna R. Pickard, R.N.,Ed.D.
Dean
MRP : s t
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
¡I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~
~.'.~
City of J\8rth Richland Hills, Texas
October 19,"1984
PUBLIC NOTICE
ITEM ADDED TO THE OCTOBER 22, 1984 AGENDA
1Sa. Consideration of Partial Payment,
Estimate #13, in the amount of
$19,451.24 to M. A. Vinson Construction
Company-Walker's Branch Drainage Improvements
O}~/ZtLd&~ >?7~J
(Jeanette Moore L--
\./ City Secretary
(817) 281-0041n301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HILLS,TX 76118
f
r--::.-
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II-
I
DATE:
10-19-84
SUBJECT:
Pay Estimate #13 - Walker's Branch Drainage Project
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND:
Public Works·
The contractor is almost finished with this project. Most of the
work that is left to be done is clean up.
_. o· ..... ..... ...
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove payment to M.A. Vinson Construction Co.,
in the amount of $19,451.24
BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: GO Rnnrl~
'~
' ., \
J¿.~ ~
I .¡
#
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
II
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTINC ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
October 19, 1984
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-323, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WALKER'S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 13
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor1s Partial Pay Estimate No. 13, dated
October 19, 1984, made payable to M.A. Vinson Construction Co., Inc., in
the amount of $19,451.24, for materials furnished and work performed on
the referenced project as of September 30, 1984.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the
esti~ate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment, in amount of $19,451.24, be made to
M.A. Vinson Construction Co. at P.O. Box 18520, Fort Worth, Tx., 76118.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you
~ay have concerning this project.
tI/,~
P.E.
R~JA/ll 9
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
~ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. M.A. Vinson, Contractor
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 7.3021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
City of j\8rth Richland Hills, Texas
October 22, 1984
ITEM ADDED TO THE OCTOBER 22, 1984, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA.
1Sb. Resolution Adopting the Sesquientennial
Master Plan
i ~ l í
".~~ z,..~~~¿¿¿// ð-tP/U--,'
J~nette Moore - City Se retary
(817) 281-0041n301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TX 76118
r
I
!
;
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
TEXAS 1986 SESQUICENTENNIAL
q4
3P
RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS
Be it resolved that the City Council of North Richland Hills,
Texas, in regular session on 1984, did formally
adopt and agree to participate in the Haltom Richland Area
Sesquicentennial Master Plan for the celebration of the
Texas 1986 Sesquicentennial in the Haltom Richland Area.
Dan Echols, Mayor
State of Texas
County of Tarrant
City of North· Richland Hills
Attest:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
I
MASTER
P LAN
I
Ie
OBSERVANCE
S E S QUI C E N TEN N I A L
HALTOM RICHLAND AREA
I
I
The Haltom Richland Area Sesquicentennial Committee wishes to submit the
following projects to celebrate Texas 150 years of history and heritage.
I
1. March 2 - TEXAS INDEPENDENCE DAY. Will be proclaimed by the
cities with ringing of bells throughout the area in churches.
2. TEXAS HERITAGE HALL WEEK - Special promotion for visitation and
public participation to tour the Heritage Hall at Tarrant County
Junior College cqntaining collection of local early day history,
using Texas Sesquicentennial logo in the promotion.
3. BIRDVILLE U. S. A. and TEXAS PAGEANT-A community wide involvement
of citizens protraying the history of BIRDVILLE, the First County
Seat of Tarrant County, attracting 10,000 plus spectators, and
using Texas Sesquicentennial logo in the promotion.
I
I
I
Ie
I
4. PERMANENT PLANTINGS - A unified plan of outdoor planting, preferable
Red Bud trees, in residential, industrial and commercial areas to
memorialize Texas' 150th Birthday in living plants.
I
5. July 2 - TEXAS WAGON TRAIN - The Texas Wagon Train overnight stay
enroute to its final destination to Fort Worth. Community and Committee
to proclaim it TEXAS WAGON TRAIN DAY, with special activities planned for
the courageous group who will begin their trek on January 2nd, from
I
I
I
Sulphur Springs, Texas.
6. To assist in the preparation and coordination of any separate
Sesquicentennial events planned by the cities of HALTOM CITY, NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, RICHLAND HILLS and WATAUGA, the BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT
SCHOOL DISTRICT, and civic/youth groups.
7. LOGO - Stationery, advertising, programs, scrap book, news releases,
publications (cook books, history, etc.) any other material that
will further help the success of the Texas 1986 Sesquicentennial
celebration, ie. brochures, invitations, etc.
I
I
Ie
I