HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1983-01-10 Agendas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting January 10, 1983 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER - . ITEM - - _ - ACTION TAKEN
PRE-COUNCIL
6:00 P.M.
1. Discussion of Schedule for Consideration (Councilman Richard Davis)
and Enactment of New Zoning Ordinance
2. Discussion of Smithfield Acres Sanitary
Sewer Improvements (Agenda Item #27)
3. Discussion of Sale of City Owned Land
(Agenda Item #29)
_ Discussion of Glenview Drive Change
Order (Agenda Item #31)
5. Discussion of ponsent Agenda Procedures
6. Other Items
COUNCIL
7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
IFICK,EN 3. Invocation ' 7 2005
4. Consideration of Minutes of the Special
Meeting - December 14, 1982
•
CITY OF NORTH RI'CHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting January 10, 1983 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER ITEM - . . ACTION TAKEN
5. Consideration of Removing Item(s) from
Consent Agenda
6. Consideration of Consent Agenda Items
Indicated by Asterisk (Items #8, 9, 10,
(y12 27, 28, 0 30 & 31)
7. Presentation of Five Year Certificate
and Service Pin to Ken Vise, Gary Ingram
and Novis Stephens - Fire Department
*8, Consideration of Appointment to the
Park and Recreation Commission
°9. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 82-62, Request of
Alco Developmqpt Company for Replat
of Lots 4R-6R, Block 14, North Hills
Addition (hoat.-d un ule We-t Old- of
RufCSimm- t iha-Int-rsectiort-o€-Mike-
Drive-and fanor Avenue) d' „ � � C , U '7
*10. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 82-64, Request of
Earl C. Baker for Short Form Platting
of Lot 1, Block 1, Earl Baker Addition
(Located on the South Side of Amundson
at Eden Road)
Page 2 •
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting January 10. 1983 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER ITEM :. - , • _ . ACTION TAKEN
-
*11. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 82-65, Request of
BWBM Partnership for Final Plat of Lot 1,
Block 1. Castle Winds Addition
(Located on the West Side of Rufe Snow
Across from Mike Street and Manor Ave.)
12. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-28, Request of John L. Gray and
Tom Campbell to Rezone Lot 4R, Block 1,
North Edgley Addition from Local Retail
to Commercial-Specific Use-Auto Laundry
(Located on Edison Drive East of RB
Furniture)
13. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-28
14. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-30, Request of North Texas Dining.
-Incorporated to Rezone Lot 4, Block 1,
Carter Addition from Local Retail to
Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of
Alcoholic Beverages (Located at the
Southwest Corner of Airport Freeway
and Blackfoot Trail)
15. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-30
16. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
_ PZ 82-31, Request of Joe Parton,
Parton's Pizza, to Rezone a Portion of
Lot 1, Block 6, Snow Heights North
Addition from Local Retail to Local
Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic
Beverages
Page 3
•
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting January 10, 1983 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER ITEM ... - ACTION TAKEN
(Located East Side of Rufe Snow, North
of Lewis Drive) _
17 Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-31 •
'(7�yg 1 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING •
^ V1- PZ 82-34, Request of Danny D. Jeffries -
V1\; \
to Rezone Tracts 1B & 1B1, Abstract 146,
William D. Barnes Survey from Agriculture
to 1F-9-One Family Dwellings
(Located on the EagC Side of Smithfield
Road at the Intersection of Evergreen)
Considertation of Ordinance for PZ 82-34
20. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING .
PZ 82-35, Request of Ray McElroy to
Rezone Lot A, Block 9, Richland Heights -
Addition from Local Retail to Commercial
(Located on the East Side of Booth
Calloway Road, Approximately 192 Feet
North of Glenview Drive)
21. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-35
22. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-37, Request of BWBM Partnership
to Rezone Tracts 2B4 and 2B6, Abstract
_ 1588, J. M. Vandusen Survey from Local
_ Retail to Multi-Family (Located on the
West Side of Rufe Snow at the Intersection
of Mike Street and Manor Avenue)
'23. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-37
' Page 4
•
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting T,.,,,,ry in_ 1981 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
- 24- PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING •
PZ 82-38, Request of R. C. Breakell
Holdings, Incorporated, to Rezone
Portions of Tracts IC and ID, Abstract
1588, J. M. Vandusen Survey from Multi-
Family and Local Retail to Commercial
(Located at the Northwest Corner of
Rufe Snow Drive and Northeast of Loop
820)
25. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-38 '
•
'6. PUBLIC HEARING - To Determine if
a Public Nuisance Exists at 7817
Maplewood
* 27. Consideration of Awarding Bid for
Sanitary Sewer Improvements -
Smithfield Acres
*28. Consideration of Awarding Bid for
Six (6) Marked Patrol Cars
*29 Consideration of Awarding Bid for
City Owned Property - Lots 1 through 5,
Block 10 and Lots 1 through 5, Block 11,
Irish Meadows Addition, Section III
_ * 30- Consideration of Awarding Bid for Snow
Heights 1982 Street and Drainage
Improvements
Page 5
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS •
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting January 10, 1983 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
*31: Consideration of Change Order on
Glenview Drive Improvements
32. Hearing and Radification on Ordinance
No. 995
33. Citizen Presentation
34. Adjournment
POST COUNCIL
1. Executive Session to Discuss Personnel,
Land and/or Litigation
To see Maps with Agenda:
Please contact City
Secretary's Office /
Municipal Records
- - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL ~ AGENDA
For the Meeting .Tan„arv ~ . 14R~ , at. 7:30 p. m. , iri the City . Hal1.,~ 7301 N.
E hoop 820
_____
NUMBER _ ITEM ,-.,~,T~.. ~,,,,~...,
_ -
• PM
1. ' Disc~son of Pro osed Sin ~ ~ ~ -
~Ord~inance A enda Item ~~8
2• ~ on of Material in ~ -
Council Fackets -
3. Discussion of Parks Master flan ~ ~ ~ ~ .
..
(agenda Item ~~ 11) ~ ~ .. .. , . ~i
.•
~.
. .
`~ Discussion of ~ Sale of Cit
Property ~ (Agenda Item ~~ 12)
. 5. .Discussion of Bids for Carpet .
for City Hall (Agenda Item ~~13)
6. .Discussfon~ of Payment for ~ ~ . .
Bunker Coats for the Fire
Department (Agenda Item ~~14)
7. Discussion of .Other Items
.. - t------~-----
• e
~ a ~ _ ~.
- - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
. CITY COUNCIL ~ AGENDA
-,
For the Meeting _January 24. 198, at. 7:30 p.m., in the Cit Hal
Y 1, ?301 N.E. Loop 820
NUMBER ITEM A
CTION TAKEN
COUNCIL
7:30 P.M, ~ '
1 ~ Calla to Order - .- ~ - .
2. Ro~,l ,Call
3. Invocation
4• Consideration of Minutes of~. ~'
the
Regular Meeting January 10, 1983 ~ ~-
5 • Presentation of Ten Year ~_
"~` Certificate and Service Pin to
~~ Robert Madrid - F
ire De artment _
6. Consideration of Ordinance for
PZ 82-38 (Postponed at the
.January 1Q, 1983 Meeting). -~
1. Consideration of Granting an
Appeal Hearing on PZ 82-32
8. Consideration of Sin Ordinance
g
for the City of North Richland ....---~
Hills
9. Consideration of Resolution
Calling a City Council Election
April 2, 1983
Z0. Consideration of Ordinance
=' Abating Nuisance at 7817
Pale 2
~. ,
~ CITY OF NORTH.RICHLAND HILLS
. CITY COUNCIL'AGENDA
f
. •
Fo the Meeting January 24, 1983, at.T:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E.
Loop 820
i ~ .
~~ R ITEM ~ ACTION TA~H
~~11. Consideration of Ado tion of .. ~ •
Five-Year Parks Master Plan ~ -
Con
_ .. ..
~. ~~
thro h lock 1 and
•--~- ~ throu h' 6 Block 11 Irish ~ ~ ~ -
. Meadows Addition - ~ ~ '
w .~~
. ~'~13. Consideration of Acce tin ~ ~ ~ ~~ i
P 8
•..
.. Bid for Carpet for City Hall ~ ~ . - ~ ~ .
i ~ ~~~
•
Consideration of Pa ent to Casco .
Industries in the Amount of ~ ~ •
• $5, b98.00 -Bunker Coats for ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ •
. ~Fire•Department .
a15. Consideration of Pa ent to ~ '
ym
' Austin- Road Company in the
Amount of $401.45 -Dawn Drive
Street and Drainage 'Improvements
'~ 16 . Con ' •
sideration of Awa d
for Trencher Backhoe Trailer
(Utility Department} ~ .
11. Citizen Presentation
Mrs. Doris Jones
Mr. Lewis Jones
Re: "Drop In" Child Care Center
in Industrial Zone
18. Adjournment
~''
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS HELD IN THE CITY
HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820
JANUARY 10, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order January 10, 1983, at
7:30 P.M.
2. Present: Dick Faram
Jim Ramsey
Jim Kenna
Richard Davis
J. C. Hubbard
Dick Fisher
Harold Newman
Marie Hinkle
Staff :
Rodger Line
Jeanette Moore
Dennis Horvath
Gene Riddle
. Rex McEntire
Richard Albin
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilmen
Councilwoman
City Manager
City Secretary
Assistant City Manager
Director Public Works-
Utility
City Attorney
City Engineer
Planning and Zoning Members:
Margie Nash
Don Bowen
Press:
Les Harper Star Telegram
Jeff Yeats Mid Cities
3. Councilman Davis introduced Reverend Wayne Green, Birdville
Baptist Church, who gave the invocation.
4. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey,
to approve the minutes of the special meeting December 14,
1982.
Motion carried 5-0.; Councilwoman Hinkle and Councilman
Fisher abstaining due to absence from the meeting.
Mayor Faram advised the Council that he had received a
letter from Mr. Earnest Hedgcoth requesting that item 18
and 19 be withdrawn, with the understanding should they
wish to reapply, would go through the procedures including
the expense.
~ 5. Councilman Kenna requested that item #29 be removed from the
Consent Agenda.
Mayor Faram stated that item #11 referred to Item #22 and
asked that #11 be withdrawn and considered after #22 had
been heard.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING -
DECEMBER 14, 1982
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
REMOVING ITEM (S )
FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA
January 10, 1983
Page 2
' n Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, CONSIDERATION OF
6. Councilma CONSENT AGENDA
to approve consent agenda items #8, 9, 10, 27, 28, 30
ITEMS INDICATED B~
& 31. ASTERISK (ITEMS #8,
9, 10, 11, 2?, 28,
Motion carried 7-0. 29, 30 & 31)
resented a Five Year Certificate and Service PRESENTATION OF FIVE
7. Mayor Faram p
' o en Vise Gar Ingram and Novis Stephens in YEAR CERTIFICATE
Pint K , Y
' 'on of five ears of service in the Fire Department. AND SERVICE PIN TO
appreciate Y REN VISE, GARY INGRAM
AND NOVIS STEPHENS -
FIRE DEPARTMENT
*8. Ma or Faram appointed Mr. Howard Nix to the. Park and
Y
Recreation Commission and asked the Council to confirm
the appointment.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey,
to confirm the. Mayor's appointment of Mr. Howard Nix.
CONSIDERATION OF
APPOINTMENT TO THE
PARK AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
APPROVED
Motion carried 7-0.
PLANNING & ZONING
*g' PS 82-62, REQUEST OF
ALCO DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY FOR REPLA'j
OF LOTS 4R-6R,
BLOCK 14, NORTH HILLS
ADDITION (LOCATED AT
BEWLEY AND TOURIST)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
*10. P5 82-64, REQUEST OF
EARL C. BAKER FOR
SHORT FORM PLATTING
OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1,
EARL BAKER ADDITION
(LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF AMUNDSON AT
EDEN ROAD)
APPROVED
*11. Ta be heard after item #22.
January lo, 1983
Page 3
l2. Mayor Faram Opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. John Gray, Euless, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Gray stated they planned to build a full service
car wash and also sell gasoline. Mr. Gray stated it
would be the type of car wash were the customer pulled
in and the attendants would clean the inside of the car,
wash it and fill it with gar.
Mr. Stan Itzkowitz, representing the owner of the. adjacent
property, appeared before the Council. Mr. Itzkowitz
stated they had no objections to the zoning request,
they would like to see the property developed.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to the request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
13. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna,
to approve PZ 82-28, Ordinance No. 994.
Motion carried 7-0.
14. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. Tommy Masterson, 8551 Mediterranean, Dallas., Vice
President North Texas Dining, Incorporation, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Masterson stated he would like to request a Specific
Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages at his
restaurant. Mr. Masterson stated that if the request
was approved the permit would be in the name of
Peter G. McQuire.
Councilman Hubbard asked who Peter G. McQuire was.
Mr. Masterson stated Mr. McQuire was the owner of the
corporation.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to the request to please come forward.
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-28, REQUEST OF
JOHN L. GRAY AND TOM
CAMPBELL TO REZONE
LOT 4R, BLOCK 1,
NORTH EDGLEY ADDITION
FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO
COMMERCIAL-SPECIFIC
USE-AUTO LAUNDRY
(LOCATED ON EDISON
DRIVE EAST OF RB
FURNITURE}
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 82-28
ORDINANCE N0. 994
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-30, REQUEST OF
NORTH TEXAS DINING,
INCORPORATED TO
REZONE LOT 4,
BLOCK 1, CARTER
ADDITION FROM LOCAL
RETAIL TO LOCAL
RETAIL-SPECIFIC USE-
SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF AIRPORT
FREEWAY AND BLACKFOOT
TRAIL)
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
4
January 10,1983
Page 4
15 o ncilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenrla,
C u CONSIDERATION OF
.
`, to a rove PZ 82-30, Ordinance No. 996, permit to be in
Pp ORDINANCE FOR
the name of Peter G. McQuire and non-transferable. PZ 82-30
ORDINANCE NO. 996
Motion carried 7-0. APPROVED
16 or Faram o ened the public hearing and called for
May P PLANNING & ZONING
. wishin to s eak in favor of this request to
anyone g P PZ 82-31, REQUEST OF
'
please come forward. S
JOE PARTON, PARTON
PIZZA, TO REZONE A
rk Collins, 40 Summerset Terrace, Bedford,
Bu
Mr
PORTION OF LOT 1,
.
ared before the Council.
appe BLOCK 6, SNOW HEIGHTS
NORTH ADDITION FROM
Mr. Collins stated he was presently developing the LOCAL RETAIL TO
Rufe Snow Plaza Shopping Center. Mr. Collins stated LOCAL RETAIL-
he was re nesting a Specific Use Permit for Parton's
q SPECIFIC USE-SALE
Pizza and if approved the permit would be in the name OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (LOCATED
of S. E. Parton. EAST SIDE OF RUFE
Councilman Hubbard asked if Joe Parton and S. E. Parton SNOW, NORTH OF LEWIS
DRIVE}
were the same person.
Mr. Collins stated S. E. Parton was Joe Parton's wife.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to the request to please come forward.
,.
.,~~
:: ~~~.
~~
~`~~~~
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
~~' closed the public hearing.
17. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to CONSIDERATION OF
a rove PZ 82-31, Ordinance No. 997, Permit to be in the
Pp ORDINANCE FOR
name of S. E. Parton and non-transferable. PZ 82-31
ORDINANCE N0. 997
Motion carried 7-0. APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
18. Withdrawn PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-34, REQUEST OF
DANNY D. JEFFERIES
TO REZONE TRACTS 1B &
1B1, ABSTRACT 146,
WILLIAM D. BARNES
SURVEY FROM AGRICUL-
TURE TO 1F-9-ONE
FAMILY DWELLINGS
(LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF SMITHFIELD
ROAD AT THE
INTERSECTION OF
EVERGREEN)
i
CONSIDERATION OF
19. Withdrawn ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 82-34
WITHDRAWN
January 10, ].983
.Page 5
20. Mayor Faram opened the public. hearing and called for PLANNING & ZON
ING
anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. PUBLIC HEARING
'
~, Mr. Jerry Lundgren, representing Mr. McRo a eared
Y• PP PZ 82-35, REQUEST
OF RAY McELROY TO
before the Council. REZONE LOT A BL
~ OCK 9 ,
Mr. Lundgren stated he was present to answer any RICHLAND HEIGHTS
ADDITION FROM LOCAL
questions the Council might have on the type of RETAIL TO COMMERCIAL
business that would be on the property in question. (LOCATED ON THE EA
ST
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Lungren what they planned to SIDE OF BOOTH
GALLOWAY ROAD
build on the lot. '
APPROXIMATELY 192
Mr. Lundgren stated it would be a privately owned family FEET NORTH OF
GLENVIEW DRIVE
~
operated rental yard with homeowner t
ype equipment, such
as lawnmowers and small items.
Councilman Davis stated that in the Planning and Zoning
minutes stated that some items would be stored outside.
Councilman Davis asked what type of items would be stored
outside.
Mr. Lundgren stated that small pumps and hoses would be
. stored outside.
Mayor Faram asked the size of the lot.
Mr. Lundgren stated that offhand he did not know the size
of the lot.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
21. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman CONSIDERA
TION OF
Hinkle to approve PZ 82-35, Ordinance No. 998. ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 82-35
Councilman Hubbard asked if specific use would be ORDINANCE N0. 998
placed on the property because once it was zoned APPROVED
commercial they could put anything they desired
on it.
Mayor Faram stated the size of the lot was so small
it had rather limited use, there was not much it could
be used for except a rental yard.
Mr. Line stated the lot was triangular in shape, 202
( feet fronting on Booth Calloway, 175 feet in an east
west direction back from Booth Calloway Road and
approximately 26 7 feet on the other end of the
triangle.
Motion to approve carried ?-0.
January 10, -1983
Page 6
22. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. Daryl Barrett, representing BWBM Partnership,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Barrett stated that he would like to thank the Staff,
Planning and Zoning Commission and the Council for their
time and cooperation for what had been a considerably
long process.
Mr. Barrett stated he felt the plan for the development
was excellent, would be an asset to the community and
add substantially to the tax base. Mr. Barrett stated
the zoning application under consideration was for 21
of the 4? acres, located at Rufe Snow and Glenview
Drive, to be developed for Multi-family housing.
Mr. Barrett stated he had an option on the other two
tracts, the tract to the west, approximately 13~ acres
ar~d the corner tract which contained approximately 12~
acres. Mr. Barrett stated it was their intention to
develop the tract to the far west in townhouses, one
and two story and the corner tract as a neighborhood
shopping center. Mr. Barrett stated that he realized
he would be required to reapply for planned development.
Mr. Barrett stated he felt this plan was a good one
and good land use planning.
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-37, REQUEST OF
BWBM PARTNERSHIP TO
REZONE TRACTS 2B4
AND 2B6, ABSTRACT
1588, J. M. VANDUSEN
SURVEY FROM LOCAL
RETAIL TO MULTI-
FAMILY (LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF RUFF SNOW
AT THE INTERSECTION OF
MIKE STREET AND MANOR
AVENUE}
Mr. Barrett stated that due to concerns he would commit ~to
the following: construct a six foot cedar fence between
the development and adjacent property. Mr. Barrett
stated the development was about 150 feet from any
existing family homes and the building
would be orientated where no patio's, balconies or major
windows would face the single family property. Mr. Barrett
stated the design of the units would include fireplaces,
washer/dryer connection, sky lights and cathedral ceilings,
large patio's, semi-private courtyards, energy design
configurations. Mr. Barrett stated that he had been approached
concerning added traffic. He said the project would be
located on two four lane thoroughfares and would allow
traffic generated from the project to be disbursed east
and west on Glenview, north and south on Rufe Snow Drive.
Mr. Barrett stated the City Staff had done some traffic
studies and informed him the traffic that would be
generated would not substantially add to Rufe Snow Drive.
Mr. Barrett stated the capacity was about at 50~ to 64~
of the capacity of the road. Mr. Barrett stated that if
all the traffic went north on Rufe Snow the most it
would generate would be an added 5~ to 6~. Mr. Barrett
stated the figures could be verified by the Staff .
January 10,1983
Page 7
Mr. Barrett stated the Staff and City Engineer had
researched the additional load that would be lace
p d on
the water, sewer and drainage and the saw no r
~ Y p ob lem.
. Barrett stated that he had discussed with Birdville
School District the impact the development would have
on the schools, and their responce was that Snow Heights
and Mullendore could take an additional several hundred
students. Mr. Barrett stated the studies the school
had done in the last several years showed no substantial
gain in students from apartment complexes.
Mr. Barrett stated he felt this development had been
approached in a manner in which developers should work
with the City of North Richland Hills.
Councilman Hubbard stated that he had made a survey on
the traffic and there were about 9, 600 cars a day on
Rufe Snow and the capacity was considered around 18,000.
Councilman Hubbard stated that if another 600 cars were
added to the traffic it would run approximately 56~ to
capacity. Councilman Hubbard stated that Glenview was
at about 65~ capacity or approximately 11,000 cars a day
and it had a capacity of approximately 18,000.
Mr. Barrett stated that was the figures given to him.
Councilman Hubbard stated that one of the elementary
Principals advised him that they anticipated a 200 child
drop per year due~to the. development, being pretty well
complete in that part of the .city. Councilman Hubbard
asked Mr. Barrett if that .was basically what the school
told him.
Mr. Barrett stated the final sentence in the letter he had
received from the School District stated "based upon a
study conducted several years ago, we have no reason to
suspect a heavy influx of pupils as a result of this
apartment complex."
Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Barrett if he had contacted
the hospital to see what impact the complex would have
on it.
Mr. Barrett stated he did not contact the hospital.
Councilman Hubbard stated he had contacted the hospital
and was advised it would not impact the new hospital Lo
any degree, in fact the present hospital could handle it.
January 10 ,1983
Page 8 '
'loran Hubbard stated he felt the drainage problem would
Counci
.~ somewhat of a great degree if the tract was developed in
be .
in le famil residences. Councilman Hubbard stated there
s g Y
would have to be an extensive amount of work done on the
~.,
drainage.
arrett stated they had a situation where a lot of the
Mr. B
et draina a in the surrounding area was being channeled
stye g
ou h this roperty,that they anticipated taking care of
thr g p
b utting in underground pipe or improved channels.
YP
ouncilman Hubbard asked Mr. Barrett if he felt the multi-
C
famil would enhance the. probability of local retail stores
Y
in the twelve acre tract.
. Barrett stated he had been advised through correspondence
Mr
relatin to local retail being on the. tract, there would have
g
to be additional. roof -tops, meaning multi-family units, to
'ustify a location at the corner of the tract.
Ma or Pro Tem Ramsey asked if any data on the. traffic north
Y
of Loo 820 was available before and after the Outlet Mall
p
was, completed.
Mr . Riddle stated a traffic count was. made before the. Mall
was completed, but not after.
ouncilwoman Hinkle asked how many apartments were proposed
C
for the. 21 acres.
Mr. Barrett stated 370 to 380 units.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked what the. percentage would be for
one, two and three bedroom units.
Mr. Barrett stated there would be 60~ one bedroom, 35~ two
bedroom and 5~ three bedroom.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked what the 5~ of three bedroom
units represented.
Mr. Barrett stated approximately 20 units.
'loran Fisher asked the estimated rental on the. units.
Counci
Mr. Barrett stated the one bedroom units would be a minimum
of $375.00 per month.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Barrett how far it was from the
t north line of the tract to the single family residential
homes.
January 10, 1983
Page 9
Mr. Barrett stated it was approximately 150 feet to the
back yards.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Barrett if he had a site plan
-- on the other property he was asking for rezoning on.
Mr. Barrett stated he did not, but he had publicly
stated they were committing to the same statements that
were made earlier in tonights meeting.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Barrett if he had a site plan
for the. second tract.
Mr. Barrett stated he did not have a site plan at this
time for the second tract, it was not in the final stages
yet.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Barrett how far from the north
west corner of the tract it was to the nearest house in
Diamond Loch East.
Councilman Kenna stated that he understood that Mr. Barrett
would not require any variances from the City Building Code.
Mr. Barrett stated that was correct, there would not be any
variances needed.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked if the traffic study that was
made was an independent study.
Mr. Riddle stated yes, it was an independent study.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that he had received many
pieces of correspondence and telephone calls in reference
to this zoning request. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated one
of the letters he had received from a resident on Tabor
Street indicated there was a negotiation period of some
sort and he had their statement of what went on and he
would like for Mr. Barrett to tell what happened.
Mr. Barrett stated that when he submitted the preliminary
plat for the tract facing Rufe Snow, three people spoke
in opposition of the plat. Mr. Barrett stated they were
concerned with being land locked with the 150 feet that
was owned by the property owners to the north that was
owned by the property owners individually. Mr. Barrett
stated that at that time he was not aware of their
desires to do anything particularly but felt the
development of the apartments would land lock them and not
allow them to have access. Mr. Barrett stated that in his
opinion they did not wonder about a land locked situation
as long as it was an extension to their back yards, but if
January 10, 1983
Page 10
they wished to develop the 150 feet and sell, there
would not be a street to it. Mr. Barrett stated the
Planning and Zoning Commission encouraged him to try
and come up with some kind of idea for the people to the
north for possible development of their property .
Mr. Barrett stated an offer was made that would also take
the cooperation of the City, a variance by the City on
arkin requirements. Mr. Barrett stated they would
P g
donate 11 feet to the owners thereby giving them 160
feet re wired for a 50 foot right-of -way, and 110 feet
q
that is required in 1-F-9 zoning. Mr. Barrett stated
they received no response to the offer from the
ro ert owners and the offer was made in writing to the
p p Y
homeowners that were present at the meeting. Mr. Barrett
stated the next contact with the property owners was when
he went before the Board of Adjustment on the. requirement
for 160 feet for rear yards and at that time he could
have developed multi-family in local retail zoning.
Mr. Barrett stated that at the Board of Adjustment
meeting it became obvious that there was a desire by the
ro erty owners for some sort of road to be constructed.
p p
Mr. Barrett stated that after the meeting he initiated a
meetin with a number of the property owners to decide
9
what the homeowners wanted. Mr. Barrett stated he. came
with maps and plans for some sort of proposal on their part,
they had none at that time. Mr. Barrett stated that some
time later he was contacted by phone and was advised that if
he would dedicate 2 5 feet of right-of -way for a street and
a for half of the construction for the. full length of
pY
his roperty, pay for the full 160 feet that would line up
p
with Mike Street then they would not contest any future
rocess on the project. Mr. Barrett stated he was given
P
one week to respond to the issue. Mr. Barrett stated he
looked at the merits of the proposal and wrote a letter
back that stated it was not f inan~ially f easible for his
ro ' ect to donate 2 5 feet plus pay for half the street and
p
the full 160 foot of street.
Ma or Pro Tem Ramsey stated Mr. Barrett had verified what
Y
the roperty owners had said. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated
p
the property owners had said that if Mr. Barrett would put
in the street, then they would not oppose the apartments.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barrett if he was to understand that
what he was saying was that he would in fact still give
eleven feet on the north side of the tract, provided he
could get a variance from the parking requirements, and
not personally participate in the development of the street
and have no access to it, was that correct.
Mr. Barrett stated the street would virtually not do him
any good whatsoever.
January 10, ,1983
Page 11
Mayor Faram stated that as far as he was concerned he felt
the street would not be of use to them. Mayor Faram stated
he did riot feel that kind of traffic should be emptied on
,.. to what otherwise would be a residential street and he would
have some problems with putting that much traffic on a
residential street.
Mr. Barrett stated he was very much in agreement.
Mr. Forrest Grubb, 6528 Tabor, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Grubb stated his property adjoined the property in question
and when he purchased his home the realtor explained to him
why he was getting such a large backyard, that being that
when the area was developed this was more or less left over
and the homeowners got the benefit. Mr. Grubb stated that
he had learned that the informed person did not have as
many fears, so he researched the property in question and
found that it had been zoned local retail in 1969 when the
master planning of the city was done. Mr. Grubb stated he
would be approximately 160 feet from the property line of
where the apartments would begin and he felt this was
adequate space. Mr. Grubb stated he felt the best use of
the land would be for apartments and would be an asset to
the-area.
Mr. Ed Olson, 6405 Brentwood Drive, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Olson stated he was one of a group of owners of the.
property.
Mr. Olson stated they had tried to sell the land for a
long time and if this zoning request were not approved
it would place a financial burden on the owners. Mr. Olson
stated he felt that the best use of the property would be to
build apartments.
Mr. Richard Russell, 6325 Juneau Road, Fort Worth, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Russell stated he was one of the owners of the land
and acted as agent for the other owners. Mr. Russell
stated that the property was zoned in 1969 and his company
proceeded to develop. Mr. Russell stated that in 1970
funding became unavailable therefore they could not proceed
with development. Mr. Russell stated the owners had paid
for the paving of Glenview Drive, Ruf e Snow Drive and the
for the utilities. Mr. Russell stated they also paid a
large amount of taxes yearly on the property. Mr. Russell
stated he felt the best use of the land would be to
build
apartments.
January 10, 1983
Page 12 '
Mr. Russell asked for rebuttal time.
Ma or Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
Y
to this request to please come forward.
Councilman Hubbard stated the Council had received a letter
from Mr. and Mr. David Christa voicing opposition to this
request. Councilman Hubbard stated they could not be
resent tonight and asked that the written communication
p
be accepted as a f ormal protest.
Mr. Randy Curnutt, 5421 Diamond Loch, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Curnutt stated he was against the apartments. Mr. Curnutt
stated the traffic would increase, crime and crowd the
schools. Mr. Curnutt stated he felt it would increase the
flood roblem. Mr. Curnutt stated he wanted to voice his
p
opposition.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Curnutt what he and his
neighbors felt the best use of the property would be.
Mr. Curnutt stated single family, townhouses and/or a
shopping center .
Councilman Davis stated there would have to be some kind
of buffer zone.
Mr. Curnutt stated the city could build a park on the
property.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Curnutt if he knew how much
it would cost to build a park.
Mr. Curnutt stated no.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Curnutt if he had helped
circulate the petition and how many citizens did he
contact.
Mr. Curnutt stated he made contact with 92 citizens and
received only one negative contact.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Curnutt if the signers of the
etition were told that all the property would be developed
p
into apartments.
Mr. Curnutt stated the plans were explained to them.
Councilman Fisher stated he thought the construction work
bein done on Dawn Drive would take care. of the flooding
g
~, problem.
January 10,.1983
Page 13
Mr. Albin stated the apartment complex would not have
any effect on the flooding on Dawn Drive . Mr . Albin
stated the problem was in the~Mackey Creek Channel and
~. was being worked on.
Councilman Newman asked Mr. Curnutt if the. zoning request
was not approved, would he be happy with a shopping center
on the property .
Mr. Curnutt stated he had rather have local retail as
opposed to apartments.
Mr. Jim Hackney, 6520 Tabor, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Hackney stated he lived north of the area and the
apartments would backup to his back yard. Mr. Hackney
stated there were many reasons why he did not want
apartments, crime went up and increased traffic.
Mr. Hackney stated he had lived there for four years and
ever since he had been there he had a water problem.
Mr. Hackney stated you could not get enough water
necessary for household use. Mr. Hackney stated he was
concerned about his property value. also. He felt the
° value would decrease if the apartments were built.
Mr. Hackney stated this rezoning request was the only
one of the Planning and Zoning Agenda that was approved
and he begged the Council not to approve it.
Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Hackney when he purchased
his home.
Mr. Hackney replied in June, 19?9.
Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Hackney if he realized that
the whole 47 acres could have been built in apartments
if the Council had not amended the Zoning Ordinance
eliminating multi-family from local retail.
Mr. Hackney stated no.
Councilman Newman asked Mr. Hackney if a brand X chicken
place went in, had he rather have that instead of
apartments.
Mr. Hackney stated yes, that was most of the residents
feelings.
Councilman Fisher asked Mr. Hackney what the problem was
with the water.
January l.o, 198
Page 14
e stated low water pressure. Mr. Hackney stated
Mr. Hackn y
that low pressure was not such a problem this past summer,
but had been in the past.
Mr. Line stated there was a pressure problem in the area,
ut the a artments would not help or h~.nder the problem.
b P
Ma or Pro Tem Ramsey stated he lived in the area and
Y
had not had any water problems.
Jack Slater, 6641 Tabor, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Slater stated he had lived on Tabor for fifteen years
and his concern was trying to back out of his driveway;
Mr. Slater stated he had to back out on Rufe Snow and it
was almost impossible because of the traffic. Mr. Slater
stated his main concern with the apartments being built
was the added traffic.
Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Slater if he came to the
Planning and Zoning meeting and expressed his feelings
when the property was zoned for apartments i~ 1969.
Mr. Slater stated most of the. area was developed and
therefore he did not ask questions.
:~~
-~~:
~~"~~ Councilman Newman asked Mr. Slater if a Mall was built
._>~
y ~" on the. tract, did he feel there would be more or less
..,,
.,
~- ~~~
traffic .
Mr. Slater stated that. if a Mall went in it would increase
the traffic .
Councilman Fisher stated he did not understand how the.
traffic enerated by the. apartment complex could affect
g
Mr. Slater if he-lived on Tabor.
Mr. Slater stated the traffic came down Tabor on to Rufe
Snow.
Mr. Frank Deavers, 6512 Tabor, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Deavers stated he wanted to register a strong protest
ainst the building of the apartments. Mr. Deavers stated
ag
it would increase traffic and he also had a water problem
and did not feel the construction of the apartments would
help the situation.
Mr. Joe Rainwater 6417 Heidelburg Court, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Rainwater asked the Council to consider what a little
more added traffic would cause on Rufe Snow and Glenview.
January 14,.1983
" Page 15
Mr. Joe Renteria, 6416 Heidelburg Court, appeared before
The Council.
Mr. Renteria stated there had been a lot of facts given
tonight, facts on the school and traffic. Mr. Renteria
asked the Council to make sure all the figures were in.
Mr. Renteria stated he was very concerned with the
possibility of the apartments being constructed.
Councilman Davis stated the Council was faced with what
the best use of the property would be and asked
Mr. Renteria what he felt would be a good development
for the property.
Mr. Renteria stated he felt the best use would be single
family, duplexes or townhouses.
Mrs.Sharron Spencer, 6628 Tabor, appeared before the
Council.
Mrs. Spencer stated that Mr. Barrett had planned to build
the apartment in the Local Retail zoning and went before
the Board of Adjustment for a variance on the rear yard
requirement. Mrs. Spencer stated the Board of Adjustment
denied the request. Mrs. Spencer stated that in the
meantime the Council amended the Zoning Ordinance deleting
multi-family in Local Retail so Mr. Barrett applied for a
zoning change to multi-family. Mrs. Spencer stated the
apartments might add to the tax base, but they would be
using more services than they were paying for. Mr. Spencer
stated that Mr. Barrett did not own the land and he did
not have to live there. Mrs. Spencer stated the highest
and best use of the property was single family.
Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Spencer if she was on the Planning
and Zoning Commission for the City of Grapevine.
Mrs. Spencer stated yes, she was the Chairman of the
Commission.
Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Spencer if you had to be a resident
of the City of Grapevine to serve on the Commission.
Mrs. Spencer stated she was legally serving on the Commission,
check with the City Attorney of Grapevine.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey said he had received a letter from
Mrs. Studebaker which differs from what Mrs. Spencer was
saying. The letter lead him to believe that if Mr. Barrett
f would have built Mike Street, they would not hav
e been
against this zoning. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mrs.
Spencer if she was familiar with the letter.
January 10, 1983
Page 16
Mrs. Spencer stated she should be, she typed it.
} Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mrs. Spencer if Mr. George
Studebaker was her father.
Mrs. Spencer stated yes, she was representing her
parents because they were out of town.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he had spoken with Mrs.
Studebaker on the telephone last night.
Mrs. Spencer stated it was she he had spoken with, her
mother was out of town.
Mayor Faram stated he also spoke with a Mrs. Studebaker
the ni ht before. Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Spencer if it
g
was she he had spoken with.
Mrs. Spencer stated yes.
Ma or Faram asked Mr. Spencer why she did not tell him
Y
her name was Spencer.
Mrs. Spencer stated Studebaker was her maiden name and
she used it when it was convenient.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that according to the letter
the biggest problem was not the apartments but the fact
the. street was not being built.
Mr. James Seaver, 6625 Briley, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Seaver stated he had lived in the city for twenty years
and had been told the. water system would be improved.
Mr. Seaver stated the water system had not been improved
and he had low water pressure problems. Mr. Seaver stated
the city should repair the system before adding anything
onto it. Mr. Seaver stated the traffic was also a problem
and felt building apartments would add to it.
Councilman Hubbard stated he lived on Riveria and had the
same water pressure problems. Councilman Hubbard stated
the city was getting the system upgraded.
Mr. Bill Ernst, 6612 Tabor, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Ernst stated he had lived in the city for twenty-four
ears. Mr. Ernst stated he did not want apartments in his
Y
nei hborhood, that the traffic was already a problem in the area
r g ~ ments it would increase. Mr. Ernst stated
and with the apart
he also had a low water pressure problem. Mr. Ernst stated he
felt the land could be used for single family residents.
Mr. Ernst .stated he felt if the apartments were allowed to be
built the property values in the area would decrease.
January 10, 1983
Page 17
l
Mr. R. D. Cunningham, 6700 Briley, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Cunningham stated he had rather see anything on the
land but apartments. Mr. Cunningham stated he also had
low water pressure problems.
Mr. Jim Keding, 4141 Rufe Snow Drive, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Keding stated that at the on final meetin wh
g g en the
property was zoned Local Retail they were told condominiums
and single family dwellings. Mr . Keding stated he felt
there was a larger crime rate in apartments. Mr. Keding
stated he also had low water pressure problems in the past,
he did have better pressure now but if the apartments were
built it would go down. Mr. Keding stated the apartments
would add more traffic to Rufe Snow and it was heavily
traveled now.
Mr. Paul Harter, 6601 Briley, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Harter stated he had lived in the city for twenty-five
years. Mr. Harter stated he was opposed to the apartments
because of added traffic, there had been several accidents
on Rufe Snow. Mr. Harter stated he always had water pressure
problems, it was always low. Mr. Harter stated he opposed
the apartments also on all the reasons stated before him.
1"~'• R. T. Yaggi, 6616 Tabor, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Yaggi stated that in reference to the. street being
built, Mr. Barrett had agreed to the property owners'
recommendation on dedicating land for the street and later
felt it would be impossible for him. Mr. Yaggi stated the
property owners and Mr. Barrett could not reach an
agreement.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
granted Mr. Russell rebuttal time.
Mr. Russell waived rebuttal time.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
23. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Ramsey, to approve PZ 82-38, Ordinance No. 999
Mayor Faram advised there was a legal petition against
PZ 82-38 and asked the City Attorney if the 3/4
majority vote would be required.
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 82-38 ORDINANCE
N0. 999
DENIED
________
Mr. McEntire stated yes.
January 10,-1983
Page 18
ouncilman Kenna stated that regardless of how the vote
C
went, there would still be more traffic on Rufe Snow.
ouncilman Kenna stated that Mike Drive being built was
C
not a city issue, the water problem was. Councilman
cit that was only 40~ developed
Kenna stated that a y enna stated the
was going to have problems. Councilman K
chools had no problem with keeping up with the growth
s
of the city. Councilman Kenna stated the traffic was
not oing to stop, all of these things were going to
g
stay with the city.
Councilman Kenna asked when the water problem would be
solved.
. Albin stated the system should be greatly improved
Mr
in the next 18 to 24 months.
Councilman Fisher stated that apartments were going to
build in the city. Councilman Fisher stated that he
lived off Davis Boulevard and apartments were being
built behind his residence, he could only hope for a
good complex.
Councilman Hubbard stated the city knew it had some
water problems, but had put all efforts toward improving
~~~~~ the s stem. Councilman Hubbard stated he had heard no
=~-~'~ co laints on the water recently until tonight. Councilman
.~ ~::~ ~
~~~=~ Hubbard stated that a public hearing had been held on the.
r- ;
parks and no one appeared.
Ma or Pro Tem Ramsey stated he lived three blocks from
Y
the. ro erty in question. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated
P P
his feeling was that if Mike Drive had been developed the
roperty owners would not have gotten stirred up. Mayor
P
Pro Tem Ramsey stated that Mr. Barrett had worked with
the ro erty owners and the city trying to comply with
p P
all requests. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that if the
ro erty stayed local retail there were 62 different
p P
types of things that could be built.
Councilwoman Hinkle stated that she lived very close to
the ro erty in question. Councilwoman Hinkle stated
P P
she had four children and all four lived in apartments.
Councilwoman Hinkle stated she did not feel apartments
were low class people, her children could not afford to
buy a home. Councilwoman Hinkle stated her main concerr~
was what could be built on the tract if left local retail.
or Faram called a f fifteen minute recess. RECESS
May
am called the meeting back to order. All BACK TO ORDER
Mayor Far
were present as recorded at the beginning of the
meeting.
January 10, 1983
Page ~19
l
i
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for the question, seconded
by Councilman Kenna.
Motion carried 7-0.
Motion to approve Ordinance No. 999 failed by a vote of
4-3; Councilmen Kenna, Davis, Newman and Councilwoman
Hinkle voting against; Councilmen Hubbard and Fisher and
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey voting for.
11. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve PS 82-65, subject to the engineers' comments.
Motion carried ?-0.
24. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak to please come forward.
Mr. Bill Crowson, representing R. C. Breakell, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Crowson stated their request was to rezone the
property to commercial.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Crowson what they planned
on constructing on the property.
Mr. Crowson stated they had no specific plans at this
time, it would basically be a retail type shopping
center.
Councilman Fisher asked if this property adjoined the
Outlet Mall on Rufe Snow.
Mr. Crowson stated yes.
Councilman Newman asked if they planned to build right
away .
~. Crowson replied no.
Mayor Faram asked if they had plans at this time.
Mr. Crowson stated they did not have imn-ediate plans.
Councilman Kenna asked what the Outlet Mall was zoned.
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-65, REQUEST OF
BWBM PARTNERSHIP FOR
FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1,
BLOCK 1, CASTLE WINDS
ADDITION (LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF RUFE
SNOW ACROSS FROM MIKE
STREET AND MANOR AVE.
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC
HEARING PZ 82-38,
REQUEST R.C. BREAKELL,
HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED
TO REZONE PORTIONS OF
TRACTS 1C AND 1D,
ABSTRACT 1588, J.M.
VANDUSEN SURVEY FROM
MULTI-FAMILY AND LOCAL
RETAIL TQ COMMERCIAL
(LOCATED AT THE NORTH-
EAST CORNER OF LOOP 8201
January 10,1983
Page 20
Mr. Riddle stated the Mall was zoned commercial.
Ma or Faram called for any one wishing to speak in
Y
0 osition to the request to please come forward.
PP
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
25. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman
Fisher, to approve PZ 82-38, Ordinance No. 1000
Ma or Faram stated that such a wide variety of uses
Y
were allowed in commercial zoning and since the
a licant had no definite plans, he would ask the
PP
Council to postpone action on this request.
Councilman Kenna made a substitute motion, seconded by
Councilman Newman, to postpone this request until the
next regular Council meeting.
Ma or Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mr. Crowson if postponement
Y
caused a hardship for him.
Mr. Crowson stated there were some things tied up that
would create some problems for the. owner. Mr. Crowson
.~.: ~~~; stated a shopping center was the. most feasible thing
`~~~~~f for the property.
,, .
,,--_~
. ~ ..~:
Substitute motion carried 7-0.
26. Councilwoman Hinkle stated that she had a possible
conflict of interest and asked to be disqualified.
Ma or Faram disqualified Councilwoman Hinkle and
Y
asked her to be seated in the. audience.
Mr. McEntire asked if the owners had been presented
with a copy of the petition.
Mr. Tim O'Neal, representing owners, stated no.
Mr. McEntire stated the hearing would have to be
postponed since they did not receive a copy.
Mr. O'Neal asked if the owner waived the petition
if the hearing could be heard tonight.
Mr. McEntire stated if the owner waived the petition it
could be heard.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. O'Neal if he waived notice.
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 82-38
ORDINANCE N0. 1000
POSTPONED
PUBLIC HEARING TO
DETERMINE IF A PUBLIC
NUISANCE EXISTS AT
7817 MAPLEWOOD
Mr. O'Neal stated yes, they waived notice.
January 10, 1983
Page 21
r Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
those for the Council declaring a nuisance to please
come forward.
Mr. Wayne Goodman, 7825 Maplewood, appeared before the
Council .
Mr. Goodman stated this was a regular house, had a regular
driveway and yard. Mr. Goodman stated that if two cars
were parked there and another one came in it blocked the
drive, picture 25 to 30 cars a day at one time coming to
the residence. Mr. Goodman stated the cars were double
parked and parked on the wrong side of the street.
Mr. Goodman stated the cars were going east on Maplewood
instead of west because of the difficulty of exiting on
to Davis. Mr. Goodman stated the people employed at the
Day Center did not have a place to park so they parked on
the street. Mr. Goodman stated there were no sidewalks on
Maplewood so the people bring their children walked in the
yard. Mr. Goodman stated another problem was the Center
had a large commercial dumpster in the front yard and it
was emptied about 4:30 a.m. Mr. Goodman stated another
problem was the noise, visualize 50 children in a residential
house. Mr. Goodman stated the. Day Care Center was causin
the property values to dro Mr. o g
P Go dman stated the Day
Care Center was a public nusiance.
Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Goodman if he had signed the
original petition that helped to get the nursery there
originally.
Mr. Goodman stated the lady that stated the nursery had
lost her lease in a building located where the YMCA is
and wanted to keep about six children temporarily.
Mr. Goodman stated the original petition had been abused
and misinterpreted through the years.
Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Goodman if he had ever left
his child in the nursery or if anyone in his residence
had ever worked at the nursery.
Mr. Goodman stated he had never left a child in the
nursery and could not recall of anyone at his residence
had ever worked there.
Mayor Faram stated that Mr. Goodman indicated he was
for the original variance.
Mr. Goodman stated no, the original petition was to keep
only four or five children.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Goodman if he had any objections to
four or five children being kept, but it had been his
understanding it would be temporary.
A
January 10, 1983
Page 22
Mr. Goodman replied yes.
or Faram asked Mr. Goodman if it was his intent to
May
' su ort the petition but for a very limited number of
Pp
+~ children.
Mr. Goodman replied yes.
Ma or Faram asked Mr. Goodman that if, since the time,of
Y
the on final petition, the center had grown to approximately
9
50 children.
Mr. Goodman replied yes.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Goodman if the property was being
used as a residence at this time.
Mr. Goodman stated no. There was no way it could be
used as a residence, it had been turned into a completely
commercial business.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Goodman if the property was being
used as a residence when the original variance was
granted.
Mr. Goodman replied yes.
Mr. McEntire asked if the property continued to be used
as a one family dwelling some time after the original
variance.
Mr. Goodman replied yes.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Goodman how long the property
was used as a residence.
Mr. Goodman stated about three years.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Goodman if he knew how many
employees worked at the nursery.
Mr. Goodman stated he did not know.
ntire asked if there were any parking facilities
Mr. McE
at the. nursery.
Mr. Goodman stated there were no parking facilities.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Goodman if he had said there was
no possible way the house could be lived in.
Mr. Goodman stated that was correct, it could not be
used as a,single family residence. Mr. Goodman stated
to much work would have to be done to the house.
January 10,1983
Page 23
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Goodman if the structure had
been changed since the variance had been granted.
Mr. Goodman stated the house was being used as a
nursery and when there is that many children there,
there would have to be quite a bit of structual re-
arrangement.
Mayor Faram asked the defendant if he would like to
ask questions.
The defendant declined.
Mr. Gary Cleinger, 7824 Maplewood, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Cleinger stated he wanted to go on record as
opposing the nursery school. Mr. Cleinger stated he
was first told there would be only five or six children
on a temporary basis.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Cleinger if he was at home
during the day.
Mr. Cleinger stated yes, he worked nights.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Cleinger if noise was a problem.
Mr. Cleinger stated yes.
Mayor Faram asked the defendant if he had any questions.
The. defendant declined.
Mrs. Mable Troup, 7820 Maplewood, appeared before the
COUnC 11.
Mrs.. Troup stated that she had counted six employees'
vehicles in front of the house just this morning.
Mrs. Troup stated she counted 39 cars bring children
and picking them up in a one hour period. Mrs. Troup
stated the main objective was the traffic and the
noise.
Mr. McEntire asked Mrs. Troup where the employees
parked.
Mrs. Troup stated they parked on both sides of the street.
Mr. McEntire asked Mrs. Troup if the noise was a problem.
Mrs. Troup stated yes.
January 10, 1983
e
Page 24
Councilman Fisher asked what the vacant lot next to
the nursery was used for.
Mrs. Trou stated the lot was iri the process of
P
being sold.
Councilman Fisher asked Mrs. Troup if the. employees
at the nursery parked on the lot.
. Trou stated she did not know, she could not tell
Mrs P
because Volkswagon had their parking lot there.
or Faram asked the defendant if he had any questions.
May
The defendant declined.
Mrs. Kiesling, 7821 Birchwood, appeared before the
Council .
Mrs. Kiesling stated she. could hear the noise from the
nurse all the way over at her house. Mrs. Kiesling
ry
stated there were so many cars on the street it was
almost impossible to drive down it.
Ma or Faram asked Mrs. Kiesling if, in her opinion, the.
Y
nursery was a~nuisance.
Mrs. Kiesling stated yes.
Mr. McEntire asked Mrs. Kiesling if she had signed
the petition.
Mrs. Kiesling stated yes.
Ma or Faram asked the defendant if he had any questions.
Y
The defendant declined.
Mr . McEntire called for Stan Gertz, Fire Chief for
the City of North Richland Hills.
Mr. Gertz appeared before the Council.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Gertz if he had checked the
nursery and what his investigation reflected
according to the requirements of the Fire Code.
Mr. Gertz stated that under the new code the owners
were given sixty days to make corrections to the
building to bring in into compliance with the current
code. Mr. Gertz stated the time period should be up
about January 17, 1983.
.
~ Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Gertz what type of school the
code pertained to.
t
~ - Mr. Gertz stated the code referred to a Da Care
Y
Center.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Gertz how many children
were enrolled at the school.
Mr. Gertz stated the State Permit showed 52 children.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Gertz if he had been inside
the nursery.
Mr. Gertz stated he had not personally visited the
school.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Gertz if the corrections had been
made and had he approved them.
Mr. Gertz stated the last inspection had been made on
December 23, 1982, and the corrections had not been
made. Mr. Gertz stated the building had not been
• approved.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Gertz if the approval of the.
Fire Department was necessary for obtaining the license
for the. 52 children.
Mr. Gertz replied yes.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Gertz if the present owners had
a permit from the State for 52 children.
Mr. Gertz stated that the present owners applied for
a permit from the State in November, 1982.
Mayor Faram asked if the defendant had any questions.
Mr. Tim O'Neal stated the nursery had approval by the
Fire Department through the year 1981. Mr. O'Neal stated
it was requested that when an ownership change took place
that the building be brought up to code. Mr. O'Neal stated
the owners were in the process of bring the center up to
code. Mr. O'Neal stated the school had been approved
every year since 1973.
Mr. Gertz stated that the policy and procedures of the City
was that when there was a change in o4:~~ership, the build-
ing must be inspected and brou ht u to curr '
~ g P en t fire
standards.
January 10, 1983
Page 25
January 10, 1983
Page 26
Mr. O'Neal stated they had complied with the requirements.
Mr. Gertz stated they had received a request from a
Mrs. Taylor with the State License Division, they were
the ones that made the request.
Mr. McEntire called for Mr. Johnny Howard, Fire
Marshall for the City of North Richland Hills.
Mr. Johnny Howard appeared before the Council.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Howard if he had inspected the
building.
Mr. Howard stated he had not personally inspected the
building it had been done through his office.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Howard if his findings were the
same as Mr. Gertz.
Mr. Howard stated yes.
Ma or Faram. asked the defendant if he wished to ask
Y
questions.
The defendant declined.
Ma or Faram asked the defendant if he wished to call
Y
anyone.
Mr. Tim O'Neal representing the Old and New Owners
appeared before the Council.
Mr. O'Neal stated that the original signers of the
etition, that stated "we the undersigned have no
P
ob'ections to Mr. and Mrs. Haley operating a Kindergarden
7
in the garage of their home". Mr. O'Neal stated this
iness had been in North Richland Hills since 1965.
bus
Mr. O'Neal stated the business went from the Haley's
to the Dollars and not to Lyn Word. Mr. O'Neal stated
that all had been interested in the safety of the.
children. Mr. O'Neal stated they had tried to comply
with eve thing required and was still in the process of
ry
tr ing. Mr. O'Neal stated that if there was a legimate
Y
com laint, if there was something that could be worked
p
out with the traffic, the 4100 cars that went down
Ma lewood could not be stopped. Mr. O'Neal stated that
p
something could be done about the 41 people that came
to the nursery, and he was sure the owners would do any-
thing the city asked. Mr. O'Neal stated the Volkswagon
lct was presently being used by the employees of the
nursery for parking. Mr. O'Neal stated the street was
all commercial up to about the middle of the Day Care
Center. Mr. O'Neal stated he had checked with the
Police Department and there had never been any
Police Department reports on the Day Care Center.
Mr. Goodman stated the Ludwicks and the Goodman's
signed the original petition, most of the other
property owners moved there knowing there was a
Day Care Center there. Mr. O'Neal stated if there
was any way they could help with the traffic they
would, but 42 cars did not make that much difference
on the street. Mr. O'Neal stated it was not the
owners or his intentions to get in a conflict with
the City.
Mayor Faram asked to see a copy of the original petition.
Mayor Faram stated that it appeared to him the petition
was for a kindergarden in the garage of the home.
Mr. O'Neal stated that was correct.
Mayor Faram stated that in no way did he read that the
whole house was to be used for the kindergarden.
° Mr. O'Neal stated he did not have the complete history -
on it. Mr. O'Neal stated the petition had nothing to do
with the nuisance part. Mr. O'Neal stated that for the
Council's information, there were 42 children in the.
~.-
~.~..,~ school and seven employees.
Councilman Hubbard asked what the ages of the children
were.
Mr. O'Neal stated almost all were under school age.
Councilman Fisher asked what the traffic count on
Maplewood was.
Mr. O'Neal stated 4200 cars.
Mr. Riddle stated the traffic count was done on the
west end of Maplewood and not the east where the
school was.
Councilman Kenna stated that apparently the Specific
Use was granted in the way of a Specific Use Permit
by the Board of Adjustment many years ago and
apparently had no expiration date. Councilman Kenna
stated that was probably missed the first time by
the property owners and was sold. Councilman Kenna
asked where the employees would park if the va
cant
lot was sold.
i
January 10,-1983
Page 27
January 10, 1983
Page 28
Mr. O'Neal stated that when the new requirements were
made in the last inspection, the parking would be
rovided for in the front yard.
p
Councilman Davis asked Mr. O'Neal if he filed a
request for rezoning.
Mr . 0' Neal stated no, he asked for a Spec if is Use
Permit.
Councilman Davis asked if the request was withdrawn.
Mr. O'Neal replied yes, no one could define the
variance.
Councilman Davis stated he personally visited the
ro ert and there was a car parked in front of the
P P y
nurser the entire time. Councilman Davis stated
Y
that in five minutes there were ten cars that came
and went.
Mr. McEntire asked Mr. O'Neal who the. past and present
owners were.
Mr. O'Neal stated the past owners were the~Dollars
and the present owner was Lyn Word.
Mr. O'Neal called for Mrs. Wynett Dollar.
Mr. Dollar appeared before the Council.
Mrs. Dollar stated the question on the kindergarden
bein held in the garage had been asked. Mrs. Dollar
9
stated that in July of 1965 there were thirty students
in the kindergarden. Mrs. Dollar stated that at that
time public schools did not have kindergarden.
Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Dollar if she felt the
information was conveyed to the neighbors that there
would be thirty children.
Mr. Dollar stated she did not know what was stated
to the neighbors.
Ma or Faram asked Mrs. Dollar if she purchased the
Y
nursery form her Barents and what span did it cover.
Mrs. Dollar stated she purchased it in July, 1973,
she owned it for 9~ years.
Ma or Faram asked if there was any construction done
Y
to the house.
f
Mrs. Dollar stated the garage was closed in and a
bathroom, lockers and shelves added.
Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Dollar if she would agree
with the statement that no one could live in the
house.
Mrs. Dollar stated she did not think there would be
a problem with anyone living in the house.
Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Dollar that, in her opinion,
a variance was asked for from the Board of Adjustment
around 1965 for the. purpose of keeping a f ew children,
maybe up to 30 and still occupy the house as a owner
occupied residence.
Mrs. Dollar stated yes, the demand for keeping
children became too great.
Mayor Faram stated that what he was trying to establish
was that it was actually changed from a residence to a
commercial facility.
Mrs. Dollar stated she did not think her parents
stated they intended to live there also.
Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Dollar if she would assume they
would have asked for a zoning change instead of a
variance.
Mrs. Dollars stated she really did not know, they did
what their attorney advised them.
Mr. Jerry Dollar appeared before the Council.
Mr. Dollar stated all the time they owned the nursery
the zoning across the street was commercial so they
felt their's was alright. Mr. Dollar stated the cit
advised them when the urchased h Y
Y P t e nursery there
would be no problem. Mr. Dollar stated he did not
think the parking was any problem. Mr. Dollar
stated there was still commercial zoning across the
street.
Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Dollar if he had a
meeting in Mary Taylor's office on September 21, 1982,
and was advised of the variance.
Mr. Dollar stated no.
Mr. Wayne Goodman appeared before the Council.
January 10, 1983
Page ~29
January 10,1983
Page 30
Mr. Goodman stated that it was not true that a
commercial business was across the street from
the nursery school.
Mrs . Troup appeared before the Council .
Mrs. Troup asked if the original petition stated
temporary.
Mayor Faram stated no.
Mrs. Troug stated the one she signed had temporary
on it .
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the hearing.
Councilman Newman moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Ramsey, to declare the Nursery School, located at
7817 Maplewood, a nuisance.
Councilman Hubbard stated he visited the nursery on
January 6th from 4:00 p.m.. to 5:30 p.m. Councilman
Hubbard stated there was a commercial dumpster in
the f ror~t yard which was probably in violation of the.
ordinance. Councilman Hubbard stated parking was a
roblem, there were eleven cars parked on the. street
P
at one time. Councilman Hubbard stated he had
information that both parties in Mary Taylor's off ice
had been advised of the variance and that a new
ins ection would have to be made. Councilman Hubbard
P
stated he would like to see both parties work with
the city and get the proper zoning.
Ma or Pro Tem Ramsey stated that if a public nuisance
Y
was the problem it should be decided.
Motion to declare a public nuisance carried 5-1;
Councilmen Davis, Fisher, Hubbard, Newman and Mayor
Pro Tem Ramsey voting for; Councilman Kenna voting
against.
Ma or Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman
Y
Davis, to instruct the City Attorney to prepare an
ordinance.
Motion carried 6-1.
` CONSIDERATION OF
*27' AWARDING BID FOR
.SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS -
SMITHFIELD ACRES
January 10, 1983
Page 31
*28~ CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING BID FOR
SIX (6) MARKED
PATROL CARS
29. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Ramsey, to postpone action on this item.
Motion carried 7-0.
32. Mayor Faram stated that on the advise of the Cit
Attorney he would declare a y
public hearing.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called
for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward.
Mr. Daryl Barrett appeared before the Council.
Mr. Barrett asked if this was the ordinance that
eliminated Multi-family from being built in Local
Retail.
Mayor Faram stated yes.
Mr. Barrett stated he wanted to protest the ratifi-
cation of the ordinance. Mr. Barrett stated it had
been proven tonight how arbitrary the decisions of
a zoning case could be. Mr. Barrett stated he had
been involved with this project since March, 1982,
and involved with the city on submitting a preliminar
plat since September, 1982. Mr. Barr y
ett stated it
was amazing to him that the Council would take action
as late as January 10, 1983, which would remove the
only feasible use for his property. Mr. Barrett stated
he felt there should be a grandfather clause in the
ordinance.
Mr. Bill Ernst, 6612 Tabor, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Ernst asked that if once the ordinance was in
effect Multi-family could not be built in Local
Retail.
Mayor Faram stated that was correct.
Mr. Forrest Grubb, 6528 Tabor, appeared before the
Council .
CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING BID FOR
CITY OWNED PROPERTY-
LOT 1 THROUGH 5
BLOCK 10, LOTS 1
THROUGH 11, IRISH
MEADOWS ADDITION,
SECTION III
POSTPONED
HEARING AND RATIFICATION
OF ORDINANCE N0. 995
APPROVED
~'
January 10, 1983
Page 32
Mr. Grubb asked if there was no grandfather clause
in the ordinance, so that someone could complete a
project that was started.
Mr. McEntire stated there was no grandfather clause
in the ordinance .
Councilman Fisher stated he would like to make a
omment at this time. Councilman Fisher stated that
c
he felt intimidated by the, crowd tonight, but felt
the best use of Mr. Barrett's property was multi-
f ami ly .
Ma or Faram stated he hoped the Council could rest on
Y
their decision and was not intimidated by the. crowd.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the. public hearing.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Ramsey, to ratify Ordinance No. 995.
Motion carried 7-0.
Tabor a eared before the CITIZEN PRESENTATION
33. Mr. Bill Ernest, 6612 , PP
Council .
Mr. Ernst stated no one intended to intimidate any-
one. Mr. Ernst stated they only wanted to express
their opinions.
Mrs. Claude Byrd, Little Dude Court, appeared before
the Council .
Mrs. Bryd stated she wanted to know if the property
that Lyle Cherry owned was zoned commercial.
Ma or Faram advised Mrs. Bryd if she would come to
Y
the City Hall the Staff would check the zoning map.
Mr. Riddle stated he thought the. property was zoned
commercial .
ad'ourned the meeting of January 10, 1983 ADJOURNMENT
34. Mayor Faram
Dick Faram - Mayor
i
ATTEST:
t
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
~!
CITY OF NORTN RI~CNLAND NILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
. .
~"4~' the Meeting Februar 14 1 •
983 , at 1.30 p.m, , ~n tt~e City Nat ~ , 7341 N.E, Loop 820.
HUMS ER ~ ~ ITEM :: . ~~ . ~ ACT ION TAKEN
PRE-COUNCIL - 6:30 P.M. '
1, Discussion of Prices Charged for
a 'o .~
Ma o n ilman Davis
2• Discussion of Pro osed Zonin Ordinanc
e
-.... ..
1'c Wo ks Productivit
Discussion of Extension of Traffic Lane
on Davis Boulevard (Agenda Item ~~24) ~ .
~ ~
... _ _
6, Discussion of Other I ems
7. Executive Session to Discuss Personnel
s d due to sub ect matter
and and1or L1tlQati~n
i
~ '
1
e'
. ~- C IT1l OF NORTH .RI~CHLAND H i LLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
~~) t' `h a Meet i rig .
P_ r„arv 14, 19$~ ~, at 1.34 p.m. , in the City Nal ~ , 134 N.E. Loo 820.
NUM~ER~ . ~ .:. ; ~ ~ ~ ITEM :. ~ .~
. ~ -~ . , . ACT ION ~ TAKEN
COUNCIL
___ 2 ~. Ro 11 Call
3. Invocation
4. Consideration of Minutes of the Regular
..
' n r 24 1983.
Presentation .of Ten Year Certificate .
nd Service Pin to Robert Madrid of the
....
Presentation of Five Year Certificate
f_1981-82 Annual Audit
s ,,.-,~y~.1 ~vv ~ ~~,~v ~ lv~ - rutSL i 1. ri~~x1NG -
___..
APPFAT~ HFARTNG - P , $ -~ , ReauPGt of
Tierra Financial, Incorporated, to
Rezone Tra_t A, Abstract 321. William
fox Sl~,~vey f rom A ~ to Multi
Famil Located at the Northwest Corner
of Turner and Davis Boulevard}~
v
Page 2 ~ .
. -- CITY OF NORTH RI~CNLAND N I LAS
CITY COUNCIL aGENO~A
r!'r ~h a Meet ~ r~ Februar 14 1 ~ •
...~- v 983~~, at 1.30 p.m. , i n the C~ ty Nal ~ , 1301 N.E. loo 820.
p
HU .ER~ . ~ . - . ; ~ ~ ~ ITEM ~ .. ..
. ... .. RCT IOH ~ TAKEN
9. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ $2-32
~~ 10. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-2
,, Request of
o f o e lat of Lot 7R
Block 2, Meadow~Lakes Addition (Located
.•
ircle
~11. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-3 Re uest of
~~ Hos r oration of America for Final
-.~
allowa Farm
Addition (Located on the West Side of
d ~ .
NING - PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 83-3, Request of F. Sam Hud ins to
.....
Rezone a Portion of Tract 3A Wm.~Mann
r from Local R 1 i-Famil
Located a roximatel 00 feet East of
Rufe Snow Drive and 170 feet South o~f
Hi htower Drive
13. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-3
14:~ Consideration of Ordinance Am ~'
endin
Ordinance No. 195 Subdivision Ordinance-
Street Lighting
a--~--.
~ Consideration of Grantin an Appeal
ea,r ing ~~ P 8 2-~ 3 s
__..
~ .
Page 3 .
. -- CITY OF NORTH .RI~CNLAND N I LLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENOA
r{~~' she h4eeti rig February 14, 1983
~, at 7.30 p.m, , fn the -
City Na~1, 1301 N.E, Loo 820.
p
NU~ER~ .~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ITEM ~ a ., .. ..
. ..
•~ A
. CTIOH TAKEN
' on PZ -2 ~ ~ .
.
Consideration of Grantin a Variance .
~~
From the Sin Ordinance - Racetrac
roleum
8. Consideration of Acce Ling Bid for ~--
Econom Car - Police De artment
•• ..
n
_...~
' of Awardin Bid for Prewitt
. .~
Consideration of Partial Payment, ~ ~ ~. .
Estimate ~~1, to Lewis & Lewis in the
.....
' field Acres
. ,
.~
/~ 1 . .
Consideration of Partial Pa ent,
Estimate ~~1, to Szolaruk Corporation
2.71 North Hills
and Draina e Pro'ect
22. Consideration of Payment to Southwestern
Amount of
' f D is and
r____. Main
2 Consideration of Partial. Payment,
Estimate ~~5, to Austin Road Company
' he Amount of 36,977,44. Dawn Drive
Page 4 ~ '
.. CITY OF NORTN .RI~CNLAND HI
lLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
~.
Eo t' the Meet ~ ng ~~ ~ .
~4 z , at 1:30 ~.m., In tie Cat N
. y all , 7301 N. E, Loo 820.
p
NU ER. . , .. ~ ITEM ~~
. ... .. •~ .. .... ACT ION ~ TAKEN
'24. Consideration of Extension
of Traffic
Davis Boulevard ~ '
Citizen Presentation .
Mr: Earl McKinne McMasters Build .
ers, .
~' Incor orated, 105 Glade Road, Cblleyville
~•
' in Water Service from McKee
.,.
' om an
Ad'o t
..
. ,.
. ..
...
,~
...
,• ~ .
,.
r f
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820, JANUARY 24, 1983 - 1:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called the meeting to order
CALL TO ORDER
January 24, 1983, at 7:30 .m.
P
2. Present: Jim Ramsey Mayor Pro Tem
ROLL
CALL
Jim Kenna .
Richard Davis Councilmen
J. C. Hubbard
Harold Newman
Staff:
Rodger Line City Manager
Jeanette Moore City Secretary
Rex McEntire City Attorney
Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager
Gene~Riddle Director Public Works/Utility
Richard Albin City Engineer
Planning & Zoning Members:
Margie Nash
Mark Wood
George Tucker
Park & Recreation Members:
J. Douglas Davis
David McGilvary
Neal McCombs
Sign Committee:
Dick We11s
Members of the Press;
Jeff Yeats Mid Cities
Absent;
Dick Faram Mayor
Dick Fisher Councilman
Marie Hinkle Councilwoman
3. The invocation was given by Councilman Davis. I
NVOCATION
4. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis
CONSIDERATION OF
to approve the minutes of the January I0, 1983 meeting. MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
Councilman Kenna stated that on page 15, 6th paragraph, JANUARY 10 1
983
it should read "Mrs.", page 33, the name should be "Ernst". APPROVED
Councilman Davis stated that on page 1, it should state AS CORRECTED
"Reverend Dwaine Greene . " --------
Motion to.approve with corrections carried 4-0.
i
January 'l4, 19.83
Page 2
5. Mr. Robert Madrid was not present.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey advised that this item would be
placed on the February 14, 1983 meeting.
b. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis,
to approve Ordinance No. 1000.
Councilman Kenna asked if the Declaration of Restrictions
would become part of the zoning change.
Mr. McEntire stated yes, and on the second page under
Section 2, add "this property shall not be used for any
multi-family residential use." On page 2, Section 3,
add "this covenant is given as an inducement to the
City Council of North Richland Hills passage of
Ordinance No. 1000."
Councilman Kenna withdrew his motion.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis,
to approve Ordinance No. 1000 with the stipulation
that the zoning change not be effective until the
Declaration of Restrictions were executed and recorded.
i~
Motion carried 4-0.
7. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to rant an appeal hearing for PZ 82-32 to be held
g
on February 14, 1983.
Motion carried 4-0.
. Ma or Pro Tem Ramsey stated that Councilman Kenna had
s y
acted as liaison to the Sign Committee and asked that he
present this item to the Council.
Councilman Kenna stated that he would like to recognize
Mr. Dick Wells who was present in the audience and ,
had acted as Chairman of the Sign Committee. Councilman
Kenna stated the co..ittee had consisted of citizens.
Councilman Kenna stated the committee had held public
hearin s on the proposed Sign Ordinance and had citizen.
g
in ut. Councilman Kenna stated the members of the committee
P
were Dick Wells, Susan Burk, Dr. Andy Kulaga and
Jim Harrison and he felt they were deserving of thanks
from the Council for their time and efforts.
Mr. McEntire stated that on the first page of the Ordinance,
"Be it Ordained by the City Council of the City of North
'chland Hills", should be added; Section 9.b deleted and a
Ri
enalt clause added and a Section 11.1 be added,a Saving
P y
Clause, to the last Article.
PRESENTATION OF
TEN YEAR CER' - i
KATE AND SERv ICE
PIN TO ROBERT
MADRID - FIRE
DEPARTMENT
POSTPONED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 82-38
POSTPONED AT THE
JANUARY 10 , 1983
MEETING)
APPROVED
ORDINANCE N0. 1000
CONSIDERATION OF
GRANTING AN
APPEAL HEARING ON
PZ 82-32
GRANTED
CONSIDERATION OF
SIGN ORDINANCE
FOR THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS
APPROVED
ORDINANCE N0. 100
• January 24, 1983
Page 3
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis,
to approve Ordinance No. 1001 with the changes made
' by the City Attorney.
,.
Motion carried 4-0.
9. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that this Resolution called
for an election on April 2, 1983 for the purpose of
electing Council Places 1, 3, 5 and 7. Mayor Pro Tem
Ramsey stated that on page two of the Resolution the
name of Mrs. Aline Parker should be inserted as
Election Judge and Mrs. Roland Starkey as Alernate Jud e.
g
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna,
to approve Resolution No. 83-1.
Motion carried 4-0.
'-
10. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that a Public Hearin was
held on Januar 10 18 o g
y 9 3 n the Nursery School located
at 7811 Maplewood and was declared a nuisance. Mayor
Pro Tem Ramsey stated that at that time the City
Attroney was instructed to prepare an ordinance abating
the nuisance.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman,
to approve Ordinance No. 1002,
Motion carried 3-1; Councilmen Davis, Hubbard and
Newman voting for; Councilman Kenna voting against.
11, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that work had begun on
the Parks Master Plan in October, 1981 and the Plan
was finalized and adopted by the Parks Board in
August, 1982. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that
Public Hearings ahd been held and there had been
no input from citizens at~the hearin
gs.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey ask Mr. David McGilvary of
the Parks Board to present the Plan.
Mr. McGilvary stated the Plan included final engineering
plans and specifications to begin implementation at this
time.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, on behalf of the City, thanked
the Park Board for their time and effort put into the
Plan. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he felt it was a
super plan.
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION CALLING
A CITY COUNCIL
ELECTION APRIL 2,
1983
APPROVED
RESOLUTION N0. 83-
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE ABATING
NUISANCE AT 7817
MAPLEWOOD
APPROVED
ORDINANCE N0. 1002
CONSIDERATION OF
ADOPTION OF FIVE
YEAR PARKS MASTER
PLAN
APPROVED
.- _____
January 24 , 1983
Page 4 '
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to authorize the Staff to implement the Five Year Master
Plan for the Parks.
..
Councilman Kenna stated that currently there was around
00 000 and ho efully the first phase would be completed
$1,5 P
b the fall. Councilman Kenna extended his thanks to the
y
Park Board for a job well done.
12. Mr. Line stated these lots were residential lots that
were owned by the City. Mr. Line stated the lots were
read for development and the Staff recommended the bid
y
of Steve Simpson Builders in the amount of $117,000.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman,
to accept the bid of Steve Simpson Builders in the
amount of $117,000, funds to be deposited in General
Fund, Sale of City Property.
Mr. Richard Compton, 5608 Newman Drive, appeared before
the Council.
Com ton asked where the lots were located and.if the
Mr. p
ro ert was zoned for multi-family or single family.
p P y
r. Line resented Mr. Compton with a map showing the
M P
location of the lots and advised him the property was
zoned for single family.
' Motion carried 4-0.
'ne stated the carpet in City Hall was approximately
13. Mr. Li
' ears old and in poor condition. Mr. Line stated
eight y chase the carpet and the
that funds were available to pur
Staff recommended the bid of Quality Decorating Center.
ilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
Counc
to accept the bid of Quality Decorating Center.
Motion carried 4-0.
ncilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis,
14. Cou
to a rove payment to Casco Industries in the amount
PP
of 5 697.00 for Bunker Coats for the Fire Department.
$~
ouncilman Hubbard stated that for the record, due to a
C
State Law on fire fighting equipment this purchase
new
was necessary.
CONSIDERATION OF
ACCEPTING BID FOR
CITY OWNED
PROPERTY , LOT lA &
1B, BLOCK 9, LOTS
1 THROUGH 5,
BLOCK 10, LOTS 1
THROUGH 6, BLOCK
11, IRISH MEADOWS
ADDITION
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
ACCEPTING BID FOR
CARPET FOR CITY
HALL
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PAYMENT TO CASCO
INDUSTRIES IN THE
AMOUNT OF
$5,697.00 FOR
BUNKER COATS FOR
FIRE DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
Motion carried 4-0.
' January 24 lg
83
Page 5
15. Councilman Davis moved, seconded b Councilma
Y n Kenna, CONSIDERATION OF
to approve payment to Austin Road Company in the amount T
j of $401.45 for Dawn Drive Street and Drai PAYMENT TO AUSTIr
Wage Improvements. ROAD COMPANY IN
Motion carried 4-0. ~ THE AMOUNT OF
$401.45-DAWN DRI~i
STREET AND DRAIN-
. AGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
16. Mr. Line stated the Council had instructed the
Staff CONSIDERATION OF
at a previous Council meeting to re-bid this item.
Mr. Line stated the bid was advertised and thr AWARDING BID FOR
ee TRENCHER BACKHOE,
bids were received. Mr. Line stated the Staff reco
the bid be awarded to Dit ~ ~ mmended TRAILER (UTILITY
ch Witch in the amount of DEPARTME
$32,004. NT}
APPROVED
-_______
Mr. Mike Bye, Vermeer Equipment Company, a eared befor
the Council. pp e
i•
Mr. Bye stated there were a couple of items he wanted to
mention in regards to the bid. Mr, Bye stated that onl
one company was consulted on s ecificat' y
P ions of this bid
and that was the reason the City only received one bid the
first time it was let for bids. Mr, Bye stated that w
his compan was called hen
y and ask to bid, no further information
was requested as far as the specifications were concerned.
Mr. Bye stated his company and some other com anies did so
changing around in order to me p me
et the specifications. Mr. Bye
stated it was public record that another City bou ht the
Ditch Witch package at a considera g
ble less price.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated the concern of the Council was
not the cost, but there was some concern on the warrant
that had to be clarified. Ma or Pro Tem y
Y Ramsey stated the
Company that had been recommended the bid be awarded to
did have abetter warranty than the other two com anies
that bid, p
Mr. Bye stated there was no indication given that the
warranty would sway the bid one way or the other.
Councilman Kenna stated that when the original bid was
advertised, the City did ask for a one year warranty.
Mr. Bye stated it was not included in the on final bid
request. g
Mr. Line stated that Vermeer did meet the specifications
there were two minior differences, one was the warrant
and the bid of Ditch Witch was 4.00 y
$ higher with abetter
warranty.
Mr. Bye stated it was his opinion the specifications were
written around one company.
January ?4, 1983
Page 6 ~ '
Councilman Davis called for the question.
Motion to approve the b id.of Ditch Witch carred
4-0.
17. Mr. Line stated he was contacted on Friday, January 21st,
by the applicants and they did not wish to address the
Council.
Mr. Roy Falls, 3708 Denton Highway, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Falls stated he wanted to address the Council on the
recent increase in the speed limit on Denton Highway.
Mr. Falls stated he realized that Denton Highway was in
Haltom City, but he was a resident of North Richland Hills
and wanted to ask the Council to try and help resolve the
situation. Mr. Falls stated that he had appeared before the
Haltom City City Council and they had reacted favorably to
his request to reduce the speed limit. Mr. Falls stated
that City Manager Pat Moffatt assured him they would take
a second look at the speed limit. Mr. Falls stated Denton
Highway had become a speedway and was very dangerous.
Mr...Fali~s stated he wag -requesting Forth ~Riehland Hills t~~~c~ontact
Mr. J. R. Stone of the Highway Department to see if something
could be worked, out.
Mr. Falls presented the City with a petition on reducing the
speed limit on Denton Highway.
Mr. Dan Haynes, 3726 Denton Highway, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Ha nes stated the problem was that when Denton Highway
y
was widened and resurfaced, the speed limit was raised to
45 miles per hour. Mr. Haynes stated there had been a
number of accidents since the speed limit had been changed.
Mr. Line advised he would contact Mr. Stone and see if
something could be worked out.
Mr. McEntire stated the Highway Department was presently doing
a study of Denton Highway.
Mr. Terry Taylor appeared before the Council.
Mr. Taylor stated he was concerned about the property
being developed by Folsom and asked how the property was
zoned. Mr. Taylor asked if the zoning had recently been
changed.
CITIZEN
PRESENTATION
MRS. DORIS JONES
~. LEWIS JONES
RE: "DROP IN
CARE CENTER
IN INDUSTRIAL
ZONE
i
' January 24, 1983
.~
Page 7
Mr. Line stated the pro ert
for mul '- ~ P y had been zoned
ti family since the late 1960's.
..
Mr. Taylor asked if the propert had re
`~ Y Gently
been sold.
Mr. Line stated that Mr. Folsom had own
for a number of ear ed the property
y s.
Mr. Mark Bye, Vermeer Equipment Com an '
before the Council. P y, appeared
Mr. Bye stated there had been no re uiremen
year warrant in the o ~ q t for a one
Y riglnal bid for the trencher backhoe.
Mr. Line advised Mr. Bye that was a mote ues '
time and advised him to meet q Lion at this
with Mr. John Whitney,
Purchasing Agent.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey adjourned the meetin of
January 24, 1983, g ADJOURNMENT
i
i
ATTEST:
Jim Ramsey, Mayor Pro Tem
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
[~'
~
f ` r 7
~~T~/"a.~_ ~ ® „/ 1'v'Cs~"C/' , tee.,
~'ti,` V ~,~,~
~~-
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
.
For the Meeting F , at 7:30
- -~
p•m•, in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loo 820
P
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
PRE-COUNCIL
6:30 P.M.
1• Discussion of Legislative I
ssue~.
(Councilwo
Texas State Legislature and Unite man Hinkle
States Congress
2• Discussion of Sin le Bi
dder
Ma or Pro Tem Ram
Purchases
~
~J
3•'
Discussion of Contract with C'
It ~
~~5
~
Auditory (Agenda Item ~~15) ~
,
'``
a
~+ • Discussion of jdalker Branch
Storm Drainage Project
5• Discussion of Contour Ma Fees
P
6• Discussion of Date for Collin
ga
Special City Council Meeting to ~ ..-.~ ~' ~,1 ~ /n// -°~
G .,~„
Certif~Absentee Ballots for ~
City Council Election A ril 2, 198
7• Discussion of Resolut'on -
-Grant As.siatance:~_- Law ~nf orcemen
ui ment A enda Item ~~ )
,
~ ~ ~~
,
~
~
8• Executive Session to Discuss (Closed du
e to subject matter)
Personnel, Land andfor Litigation ~ ~ ~~
.Q~~~i%..~,'i - ~C .~'
~~~:~
~ . --
r
~`
s
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
•, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting , at 7:30
p•m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loo 820
P
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
COUN
7:30 P.M• .
1• ,Call to Order
2• Roll Call
3• Invocation
4• ~ Consideration of Minutes of
the
Regular Meeting Februar 1
Y 4, 1983
5• Consideration of.Removin Ite
g m (s}
From Consent Agenda
b• Consideration of Consent A end
g a
Items Indicated b •
~f15, 16, 17, 18, 20
~• Consideration of A ointment
to
8• PLANNING Z _
PZ 83-1 Re u
Rezone Tract 2B J. B. Ed n
Abstract 499 from A ricultur
1F-9-1400-One Famil Dwellin s
(Located at the East end of
Crestview Drive and A roximatel
850 feet West of Eden Road)
9• Consideration of Ordinance fo
PZ 83-1
r
r~
Page 2
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting -F brute at 7.
'30 p•m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loo
p 820
NUMBER _ ITEM
- ._ ACTION TAKEN
14: PLANNING & ZONIN -
G PUBL
PZ 83-5 Re uest of Bankers Lif •
of Lincoln Neb. to Rezone Tract
3B, E. S. Carder Surve Abstract
308, from Multi-Famil to Local
Retail-Specific Use-Hotel Motel
(Located on the North Side of
Airport Freeway and Bounded on
• the West by Jo Beel's Restaurant
}
11.. Consideration of Ordinance for
• PZ 83-5
12• PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEAR
IN
PZ 83-6, Request of Nassar
Shaf i our to Rezone- a Portion of
Tra
from Local R t•a;1
Development (.Coca
TESCO Ri ht-of-Wa and Bou d ~ •
the East b Irish Drive and ri
Meadows .Additions)
13, Consideration of Ordinance for
PZ 83-b
14. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-1,
Request of Nassar Shafipour for
Fin
Gate Ac~r~;r;~„
r
..._ r. ~ .
e
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~~ ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ge 3
For the Meeting Februar 28 1983 , at 7•
•3~ ~•m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E.
Loop 820
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
* Consideration of
Peat Marwick and Mi
~Com an as Cit Auditor
- * Consideration o
f Resolution
Authorizin Cit Officials to
Make A lication for Grant
Assistance for Park Sites
17* Consideration of A reem '
g ent with
St. Louis Southwestern Railroad -
Si nalization ~ .
* Consideration of Extension of
of Traffic Lane on Davis B
lvd.
19. Consideration of Re uest
Q of
Kem Advertising Incorporated
foraP ~ to .
Billboard
* Consideration of Resolution
Authorizin Cit Officials to
Appl for Grant Assistance -
Law Enforcement E ui ment
~1. Citizen Presentation
. Ad'ournment
-~
e~ ~
MINUTES OF TH E REGULAR MEETING OF T
HE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE
TEXAS
HELD I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS,
,
N THE
CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820, FEBRUARY 14
1983
,
- 1:30 P
. M.
1• Mayor Faram called the meetin t
7:30
g o order February 14, 1983 at
,m,
P
2, Present: Dick Faram
Mayor
Jim Ramsey Ma or Pro Te
Y m
Jim Kenna
Richard Davis Councilmen
J.C. Hubbard
Harold Newman
Marie Hinkle Councilwoma
n
Staff:
Rodger Line Cit Mana er
Y g
Ginny Pierce
Rex McEntire City Manager Secretary
Richard Albin Cit Attorne
Y Y
City Engineer
. Dennis Horvath Assistant Cit
Y Manager
Lou Spie el
g
~~ John Whitney Director Finance
'
~ Purch
asing Agent
r
Board Members:
~.._.
Marjorie Nash Plannin and Zo '
g ning
George Tucker Planning and Zoning
Press:
Jeff Yates Mid Cities Dail
y News
Absent:
Dick Fisher Councilman
Jeanette Moore City Secretar
Y
3, The invocation was given b Council
Y man Hubbard,
The Mayor noted that Item ~~8 would re uir
the Council and in Q e a 3j4 vote from
th
e past the applicant had been iven
the opportunity to postpone until the fu g
11 Council
was
present and that w
ould be done tonight, He asked if the
applicant wa
s present for Item ~~8, PZ 82-32
Delbert Stembridge came forward and stated th
at he was
representing the a licant
PP and t
o
i hat he would like to post-
p
ne s
nce a full Council was no t present,
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded b Counc'
Y ilman Hubbard
to postpone Item ~E8
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
...- ~
-•~
Motion carried 6-0.
The Mayor stated that all those
were free to go or sta Present to oppose
y and if they would list their
names and addresses on a pad by the back
Council Chambers the wo door of the
y uld be notified when the hearin
was reset, g
The Mayor stated that this item wo
Council Meetin t uld be heard at the
g o be held March 14th.
4. Councilwoman Hinkle moved se
Hubbard to a ~ conded by Councilman
pprove the minutes of the regular meetin
January 24, 1983, g
Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor Faram asked Councilwoman Hink
le why she abstained,
Councilwoman Hinkle stated she abs '
talned due to absence
from the meeting.
Mayor Faram requested someone to make
was present at the 1 the motion that
ast Council Meeting.
Councilman Hubbard moved to acc •
~ Januar 24 Ig ept the minutes of the
`__~ Y ~ 83 Council Meeting, seconded b Co '
Davis, y uncllman
Motion carried 5-0.
5. Mayor Faram presented a Ten Year
Certificate and Pin to
Robert ..Madrid of the Fire De artment.
P
6. Mayor Faram presented a Five Y
ear Certificate and Service
Pin to Del Browning of the Ins ectio
P n Department
1. Clyde Womack and David Tolson o
f the firm Pete, Marwick
and Mitchell presented the 1981-82 Ann •
Council, ual Audit to the
Mr. Womack stated that from a CPA s •
opinion on the f ina tandpolnt, a clean
ncial statements was given the Cit .
Y
February 14, 1983
Page Two
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 24, 1983
APPROVED
PRESENTATION OF TEN
YEAR CERTIFICATE AND
SERVICE PIN TO ROBERT
MADRID OF THE FIRE
DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION OF FIVE
YEAR CERTIFICATE AND
SERVICE PIN TO DEL
BROWNING OF THE
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION OF 1981-82
ANNUAL AUDIT FOR CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
''~ _
(• 8. Postponed as previous mentioned.
t
9• Councilman Hubbard moved
seconded by Councilman
Kenna to postpone Item ~~9•
Motion carried 6-0,
10. The Mayor stated that the P
lanning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of PS 83-2,
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, sec
onded by Councilman Newman
to approve PS 83-2.
Motion carried 6-0,
11. Mayor Faram stated that the P
lanning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval subject to the en in
with an additional eas g eer's comments
ement for water and sewer, all
comments had been met.
Councilman Hubbard moved, second
Hinkle to a rove P ed by Councilwoman
PP S 83-3,
Motion carried 6-0.
12, Mayor Faram opened the ubl'
wishin to s p lc hearing and called for an one
g peak in favor of this re uest to y
forward, q please come
Mr. Larry Gill, 4560 Beltline D
before the Counc' ~ alias, Texas appeared
il• Mr, Gill stated that he was
representing the owner Mr, Sam Hud ins a
purchaser, Mr, Bob Lato g nd the prospective
who has been a builder for 16
years. He stated that the request was f
or 15.85 acres of
the 34 acres to be changed from L
ocal Retail to Multi-
Family. Mr. Gill stated that t
as a buffer be he Multi-Family would act
tween the single family and retail,
February 14, 1983
Page Three
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING -
APPEAL HEARING ~-
PZ 82-32, REQUEST OF
TIERRA FINANCIAL,
INCORPORATED, TO REZON
TRACT 3A, ABSTRACT 321
WILLIAM COX SURVEY
FROM AGRICULTURE TO
MULTI-FAMILY
(LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF
TURNER AND DAVIS
BOULEVARD}
POSTPONED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ $2-32
POSTPONED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PZ 83-2, REQUEST OF
THE RITZ COMPANY FOR
REPEAT OF LOT 7R,
BLOCK 2, MEADOW LAKES
ADDITION (LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF LAKE VIEW CIRCLE)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 83-3, REQUEST OF
HOSPITAL CORPORATION
OF AMERICA FOR FINAL
PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK E.
GALLOWAY FARM ADDITION
(LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF BOOTH GALLOWAY
ROAD}
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-3,
REQUEST OF F• SAM
HUDGINS TO REZONE A
PORTION OF TRACT 3A,
WM. MANN SURVEY FROM
LOCAL RETAIL TO MULTI-
FAMILY (LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET
EAST OF RUFF SNOW DRIVE
AND 170 FEET SOUTH OF
HIGHTOWER DRIVE) i
,~
~" - February 14, 1983
Page Four
Councilman Davis asked who own
ed the property
r
to the East,
Mr, Gill answered Bill Grant,
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mr, Gi '
suited for sin le 11 if he felt
g family use
this would be
,
Mr, Gill answered yes, this chap
between the sin le f ge would serve
g amil
d
as a buffer
y an
retail,
Mayor Faram asked if consideratio
n had been given to an
less '
er zoning, such as du lexes.
P y
Mr, Gill answered no,
Mayor Faram asked what the ro os
Y P p ed for traffic movement,
Mr. Gill stated that a ri ht-of-wa
g y would lead
to Rufe Snow,
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishi
ng to speak
to this request to please
in opposition
come forwar
d,
There being no one else wishin to
the public hearin g speak, Mayor
g~
Faram closed
13, Councilman Hubbard moved, seconde
d by Mayor Pro
~~ to deny ordinance 1003,
Tem Ramsey,
CONSIDE
RATION OF
~ ORDINANCE PZ 83-3
Mayor Pro Tem Ramse
~,~. y asked if any traffic counts had been
taken on Rufe Snow, DENIED
City Manager, Rodger Line stated that
on the north end there were no counts
of Rufe Snow, but estimated the scree
on the south end was 20% above ca acct t
P y.
Councilman Davis asked the Cit En in
his opinion the added Y g eer Mr.~Albin that if in
traffic would require signalization at
that intersection.
Mr. Albin stated that signalization ha
d been proposed but
could not indicate when it would be com
pleted,
Councilwoman Hinkle asked what the
Rufe Snow would be wid Proposed length of time
ened,
Mr. Albin stated that within the nex
anticipated that bids t Year and it was
would be taken the end of this month
or early next month. Rufe Snow would be wide
ned to 5 lanes.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked how man a
in question were zoned for Y ores north of the property
apartments already,
Mr. Albin stated around 20 acres.
Mayor Faram stated that he felt that
this approval would only.
open up more acreage being planned apartments
rule out single f anvil dwellin and that would
Y gs.
~,
~_ February 14, 19$3
Page Five
r~
f
Motion carried 5-2, Ma or Pro T
Davis, Hubbard Y em Ramsey and Councilman
and Newman voting for: Councilw
Hinkle and Councilman Kenna vo Oman
tang against.
14. Mr. Line stated the staff
recommended thus ordinance
which required lights at each
where the blocks were 6 corner and at mid-block
00 feet or longer and at the
of cul-de-sacs where cul-de-sac end
Mr. Line stated if 400 feet or longer.
the staff recommended a royal
ordinance with modifications re pp of the
Attorney Rex McEntire coBtmended by the City
Mayor Faram stated that the Pla
nning and Zoning had
recommended approval of the ordinance o
n January 27th.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded
to approve Ordi by Councilwoman Hinkle
nance 1004 as modified by Cit Attor
Y ney.
Councilman Hubbard asked if the
motion included the
recommendation to change from 400 to 300
Planning and Zonin Co feet that the
g m~ais s ion had made .
Mr. Line stated there would be a '
the cul-de-sac light at the corner where
took of f and if a light was re uire
end of a cul-de-sac, the li hts w q d at the
$ ould be 300 feet apart.
I
~ Councilman Dav' •
is asked if this was strictl for res' •
sub-division or industrial Y ldential
Mr. Line stated that the ordinance
was written to cover
all types of zoning.
Motion carried 6-0.
15. Councilman Hubbard moved to r
and that the he g ant the appeal hearing
aring be held on March 14, 1983
seconded by Councilman Newman, '
Motion carried 6-0.
16. Councilman Kenna moved to ra
on March 14 l g nt the appeal hearing
983, seconded by Councilwoman Hi
nkle.
Motion carried 6-0.
17. Councilman Kenna moved, second
ed by Councilwoman Hinkle
to deny this variance.
Mayor Faram stated that there was
speak and he would de art some one wishing to
p f rom the rules if no one from
the Council objected.
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE N0. 195
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE_
STREET LIGHTING
ORDINANCE N0. 1004
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
GRANTING AN Apps,
HEARING ON PZ 82-33
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
GRANTING AN APPEAL
HEARING ON PZ 83-2
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
GRANTING A VARIANCE
FROM THE SIGN
ORDINANCE - RACETRAC
PETROLEUM
DENIED
-____._
1 1
~' - February 14, 1983
Fage Six
~~
Jeff Bockman with Racetrac Pe
stated that the troleum came forward and
signs were their only wa of ad
~ ing and there had been several Y vertis-
sign would compl , howev conversations that their
the we Y er, when they made ap licatio
y re denied as the ordinance had P n
that the sign a licat changed. He stated
PP ion should be granted as the
submitted application the da b Y
changed. Y efore the ordinance was
City Attorney Rex McEntir
e asked if he came in before the
ordinance was passed.
Mr. Bockman replied yes, but M
advised that the r• Rice was out and he was
ordinance was going to than e a
not accept application, g nd they would
Mr, Line stated that on Januar
it was heard Y 24~ 1983 the plans were in a
before the Planning and Zonin nd
technically the application g that night so
was made prior to the enactment
of the sign ordinance, but the '
time elements were such that
the permit could have not to is
that the a licat' g tically been issued the day
PF ion was submitted.
Mayor Foram stated that the si n c
that area and con g ould present problems in
. curred with Ma or P
the request. Y ro Tem Ramsey to deny
~.
Motion to deny carried 6-0.
18. Mr. Line stated that this wa
s a replacement vehicle for
one that was demolished in an acciden
t.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded
to acce t the bid by Councilwoman Hinkle
P from Ryan Oldsmobile in the amou
$8,385, nt of
Councilman Hubbard asked wh more
Y bids were not received.
Purchasing Agent John Whitne s
dealers could rece' Y toted it was because. auto
ive bigger profit if sold to an ind'
than on a bid basis, ivldual
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked that
on the A enda a the bid procedures be placed
g t a later time.
Mayor Foram asked Mr. Line to la
at a later date. P ce this item on the Agenda
CONSIDERATION OF
ACCEPTING BID FOR
ONE (1} ECONOMY CAR -
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CID DIVISION
APPROVED
Motion carried 6-0.
t
1~
19. Councilman Davis moved sec
onded by Councilman. Hubbard
to approve the bid of Circle C Const
$75,557.50 ruction Co, in the
Motion carried 6-0.
20. Councilman Kenna moved sec
to a rove ~ onded by Mayor pro Tem Ramse
PP payment to Lewis & Lewis in the am Y
$9, 751.42 ount of
Motion carried 6-0.
21. Councilman Davis moved, seco
nded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramse
to approve partial payment to Stolaru Y
amount of $94 502 ~ Corporation in the
.11
Motion carried 6-0.
'~ 22. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved se
Kenna t ~ conded by Councilman
o approve partial payment to Southwestern
Electric Com a •
~_..__ P ny in the amount of $28, 310.17
Motion carried 6=0.
23. Councilman Kenna moved, second
ed by Councilman Newman
to approve partial payment to Austin Road
amount of $39,615.44. Company in
Motion carried 6-0.
24. Councilman Kenna moved, second
ed by Mayor Pro Tem
Ramsey to postpone this item.
Motion carried 6-0.
25. Tom Boaton, 1500 N. Norwood D '
rive, Hurst, Texas came
forward representing Mr. Earl McKinn
stated the pro ert was eY' Mr. Boaton
P Y directly across the street
from Keller city limits and he had
the cost of puttin another n0 one to share
g water line in and McKee
presently had a line in the street. Mr, B
oaton stated
;~ that because it was a narrow stri
not be divided int P of land it could
o numerous lots and to bring in a water
line would add an additional a rox'
lot for the develo men PP lmate cost of $1,000 per
p t.
February 14, 1983
Page Seven
CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING BID FOR
PREWITT ROAD WATERLINE
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE ~~1 TO LEWIS &
LEWIS IN THE AMOUNT OF
$9,751.42 SMITHFIELD
ACRES SANITARY SEWER
PROJECT
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT
ESTIMATE ~~I, TO
STOLARUK CORPORATION
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$94,502.71, NORTH HILLS
STREET AND DRAINAGE
PROJECT
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PAYMENT TO SOUTHWESTERN
ELECTRIC IN THE AMOUNT
$28,310.17,
SIGNALIZATION OF DAVIS
AND MAIN.
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAY~-IENT ,
ESTIMATE ~~5, TO AUSTIN
ROAD COMp~y IN THE
AMOUNT OF $39,615.44,
DAWN DRIVE PROJECT
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
EXTENSION OF TRAFFIC
LANE ON DAVIS BOULEVARD
POSTPONED
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
MR, EARL MC KINNEY,
MC MASTERS BUILDERS
INCORPORATED, 750
GLADE ROAD, COLLEYVILLE
RE: OBTAINING WATER
SERVICE FROM MC KEE
WATER COMPANY
DENIED
~~
f~
Mayor Faram stated to the C
highlighted co ouncil that they had received
py of Ordinance 837, Section E a
felt that approval of this and that he
would have some affect on f utu
bond rating for the future re
sale of bonds if not indeed
violation total and com letel be a
obligation, so he P Y thereof of the City's rese
recommended denial to this r P nt
equest.
Councilman Kenna moved, seco
deny this re u nded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramse
q est, y to
Councilman Kenna state
d that he wanted those askin
variance to recognize that the C' g for the
prohibits this and ity had an ordinance that
also it would effect those wh
authority to sell bonds in thi o give the
s City.
Motion to deny carried b-0.
Mr. Line stated that in re a
of the 1981-82 g rd to Item ~~7, the presentat
Audlt, that a formal motion ion
to accept the audit as resen might be needed
that when the Ci •p ted by the City s Auditors, so
ty vlslted the bond ratin a enci
be advised the audit had been g g es they could
accepted, and order filed.
I
~__
Councilman Davis moved, second
to acre t the a ed by Mayor Pro Tem Ramse
P ,udit. Y
Motion carried 6-0.
2b. Mayor Faram adjourned the F
ebruary 14, 1983 meetin .
g
ATTEST:
February 14, 1983
Page Eight
ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram, Mayor
tinny Pierce
NOTES ON PRE CO(TNCIL MEETIN
. G JANUARY 10, 1983 6:00 P.M
PRESENT: Dick Faram
Jim Ramsey
Jim Kenna
J•C. Hubbard
Harold Newman
Dick Fisher
Richard Davis
Marie Hinkle
Rodger Line
Dennis Horvath
Gene Riddle
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Director Public Works
ITEM DISCUS
SION
ENACTMENT OF NEW
ZONING ORDINANC Coun ~
cllman Davis discussed the ro ASSIGNMEN
T
E P posed new zonin
ordinance and the time g
tabl
Gene Riddle
e for review and i leme
tation. ~ n- Please take all
necessary follow-
Januar l4 _ ~
Y A copy well be available t
o all up action regarding
distribution of
interested citizens and a
gencies draft ordi
nances,
. advertising of
February 1 - A work sho has
p been scheduled with workshops and
hearin s no
g ' tlfica-
developers and an other
Y interested citizen. Lions, etc.
February 3 - The committee w'
ill meet with the
Planning and Zoning Commi.ss '
ion for the
purpose
of discussing revision of t
he zoning ma
p.
February 17 - A combined Pla
nning and Zoning and
City Council Work Shop has
been scheduled J
eanette Moore
Advertis
. e Meetir~
g
SMITHFIELD ACRES
SANITARY Rod er
g Line eXplained the
IMPROVEMENTS sewer im
provements that
will be completed i
'
N/A
n Smithf
field Acres and the chan e
g
i
n the bid price. This
item is on the Consent
Agenda .
SALE CF CITY
OWED pR
OPERTY
This item was discussed b
Y Rodger Lin
e and
pertains to the sale of ex
cess city property
Dennis Horvath/
John Whitne
located adjacent to the ar
p k on Emerald Hills y
Pre are
p location
Way. After discussion it was
decided that this ~P for distribution
with Council
item should be postponed un
til the next Council Packet
for Januar
Y 24th
Meeting. This item was r
emoved from the Consent Meeting.
Agenda .
Pre Council Meeting
January 10,1983
Page 2
I-
DISCUSSION
GLENVIEW CHAAjGE ASSIGNMENT
ORDER The. need for and additional
storm drain and the
cost was explained by Gene N/A
Riddle. Jim Kenna
had several questions re ar
g ding the cost of
curb replacement on Glenview.
This was explained
by Gene Riddle and Rod er
g Line .
CONSENT AGENDA Rod er
pROCEDUI~S g Line explained how the Cons
ent Agenda
Procedures will work in acco N/A
rdance with the
adopted Council Rules and Pr
ocedures.
Generally, Consent Agenda it
ems will be considered
and approved with one motion
• ~y item listed on
the. Consent Agenda ma be r
Y emoved by any Council-
person for any reason. This ne
ed not be made in
the form of a motion, merel
y a request to the Mayor
during the meeting to remo
ve an item number from
those listed on the Consen
t Agenda .
h-
TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
1020 Southwest Tower Austin, Texas 787p1 (512) 47&6601
December 14, 19$2
MEMORANDUM
T0: Texas City Attorne s
Y
FROM: TML Staff
SUBJECT: Proposed Public Utili
Fuel Co ty COfimission Rule Re Aut
st Pass-Throughs
~... 1~~ ~L I -J ~ •
~i~.~~..i• ' I c C~
(t ~ ''---- ----_.
li. ~i. !
-.~_,
s- _....._._
?'
=-~----w ~-----~
! ~ ----
'~,
~. ~
!-
5. ~
~. + 1
DATE FILED
tic
The Texas Public Utility Commissio
that would have the cla' n recently published a proposed rule
imed effect of prohibiting automatic f
pass-throughs by electric utilit com ani uel cost
Y p es,
As you know, fuel pass-throu hs wer •
gubernatorial cam g e a mayor issue during the recent
• paign, and there were widespread ubli
something be done about the problem. P .c demands that
Rollins, the Commi According to PUC Chairman Moak
ssion's proposed rule responds to t
hose demands.
Language in the PUC ru ~~
le states that it eliminates" au
justments. However tomatic fuel ad~
TML's attorneys, followin a thor
concluded that the rule does no su g ough analysis, have
no substantive h ch thing, and, in fact, that it ma
c ange in the status quo. The new kes
electric utility companies to fil rule merely requires
e estimates of future fuel costs with
the Commission on a quarterl basi •
Y s, following this exercise, the com-
panies will continue to pass all oft
to consumers withou heir fuel and other charges throu
t any incentive to hold down costs gh
Since the rule is virtuall meanie
utility com anie Y gless, it is likely that the electr
P s well embrace it and attempt to a is
to endorse the rule as the "answer" P rsuade city councils
to the automatic fuel adjustment
problem. Any such action by the ci
tees would undermine TML's efforts to
pass meaningful legislation during the 198
through procedures. 3 session to reform fuel ass-
P
In response to a mandate from TML m
ember cities that the
issue be addressed, the Lea ue has
bona fide limitat g developed legislation
ions on fuel cost pass-throw hs.
g Under
(1}
fuel adjustment
that would place
the TML proposal:
Only increases in actual fuel or urc
could be passed t ~ P based power costs
hrough to consur~ers, and even then
if the increase is the result of an only
federal regulatory a enc ov action by a state or
g Y er which the company has no
control. This would prevent abuses under
companies include o erati which utility
P ng expenses, depreciation and
other unrelated add-ons in pass-throw
ghs.
1
t
~~ ~2) Utility companies would
be totally prohibited from as
through the cost of fuel su li P sing
other affiliates PP ed by their subsidiaries or
. All fuel charges paid to subsid'
would have to be included in the caries
company's rate base as
operating expenses that are sub'ect
at a full-blown rate ~ t0 PUC and city scrutiny
proceeding.
Despite all of the current rheto
tical options for ric to the contrary, the nu~ber
controlling pass-throu hs is s °f Prac
not particularly glamorous the g everely limited. Thou h
in this re and TMD Proposal will have benefi g
g clal effects
Please pass this information
on to members of your Council and of
interested in utility re ulati hers
or would like g °n' If you have any questions
additional information, please ca °r Comments
Don Butler or his associate C 11 T~ Utility Counsel
race Hopkins Casstevens, at 512/47b-
6604.
Encls: Media articles
Proposed PUC rule
TML comments on proposed rule
r1
LJ
~- Fuel c~ljus~r-ient clause proposal
•
NousTON PosT pig 1182
AUSTIN (UPI) - A proposal by the Public
Utility Commission to abolish the controver•
alai fuel adjustment clause "doesn't do any
thing and ti auld be a waste of time, ceprer
eentatives of the Texas Municipal League said
Ftiday.
Under the ~ fuel adjustment clause, utility
companies are allowed to pass projected fuel
costs directly on to consumers on a month-to-
month basis...
Governor-elect Mark ~'hi:e's campaign toc
abolishment of the clause was considered the
key to his victory, and shortly after the elec•
tion the PUC p~~oposed a change that would
abolish the clause.
But Don Butler, legal course! for the hiu•
nicipal League, told a Senate subcommittee
the PUC'e proposal would change nothing.
"The rule as they have proposed It really
doesn't do anything at' all," said Don Butler,
legal counsel for the Municipal League. "It's
not going to mean anything whatsoever and
it's just going to waste a lot of people's time."
The Municipal League routinely represents
Texas cities before the PUC.
Chairman H.M. Rollins said it the PUC's
propoee~d rule were put into ette~ct, the fuel
coats passed on to consumers would be set
quarterly instead of monthly.
~RZ1Uns said the change would rnake it easi•
cr for consumers and businesses to project
their etility costs, but he conceder it would
not save them money.
"The ultimate cast of t~el will not be
changed," Rollins said. E{;,"ever, he disa•
greed with statements that tl:c adjustment
clause had been abused b; utilit3- companies.
"I would assure you there t~.as been ~ rigor-
ous investigation of the coat of fuel on a
monthly basis," Rollins said... . ,.. ; .
But Butler later said utilides pasa "every-.
thing but the kitchen sink" along to consual•
ors through the fuel adjustment clause and.
that it had been abused.
"There is a real misconception about the
fuel adjustment clause," Butler said. "People
have the idea that only fuel goes through it.:
There is tar more than ihat."
Butler said utilities also pass alerg operate
ing expenses, oepreciaLon any sometimes
prc:its irorn pare»t or s'lbsldiary companies.
The Municipa; League proposed a rule of
its own under which only fuel costa or the cost
of purchased power could be passed on to
!~nsuroers ar,d only it the fuel or power was
bought from anon-attilia~d compaglr, ' . .
^ ^ _ .
Sunday, December S.1982 Houston Chronicle '
.~
~' . ,
..
t
The Texas Public Utility .Commis- the pass-through.
sion's order that Houston Lighting and Rollins said, "What we are trying to
Power Co. stop listing fuel costs as a do is respond to the public outcry." The
separate item on customers' bills is an outcry is not against knowing the
incredible attempt to hide from the amount of the pass-through, it is
public what the public is paying for. against the system of automatic pass-
PUC Chairman H.M. Rollins said the through. What kind of "response" is it
reason the commission ordered HL&P to order that what causes the outcry be .
to,;stop separately showing the contra kept secret from the ublic? No knowl-
P
versial automatic fuel cost pass- edge, no outcry?
through was because. of the "political Under the theory on which Rollins
furor" it created in the last election. and the PUC are apparentl o ratin
Y Pe g
'That is an astonishing statement. they might just as well send customers
,,Doesn't Chairman Rollins realize that apiece of paper with nothing but a
it is the purpose of the political system single figure on it and expect every-
`''to_ l~e~ able to get something done about body to pay it, no questions asked.
~t~iings that create a political furor? If We do not for a minute bu Chairman
{~ the, thin s that mi ht cause a furor ar ' ~ Y
g , g e Rollins condescending explanation
~~ ordered hidden by a state agency, how that people "do not understand" the
`'dan~ the political system work? automatic pass-through. P~ple~ under-
;~~;,~~he simple fact is that the PUC stand it all too well and the also un-
w~~ oesn't want the ublic to be u set y
~. P p by derstand that the PUC is trying to hide
~~~^~the pass-through, so it is going to hide it from them.
Cornnr~is~ion's fuel charge
rule rapped
0~`~"8 T"~~o_wp OEC 11'D2
BY SARALEE TtIDE .
Austin Bureau
AUSTIN -The Public Utility
Commission's new rule far dealing
with fuel adjustment charges could
leave consumers worse off than the
present method, Don Ruder, who
represents Texas cities fighting high
u ' 'ty rates, told the Senate Sub-
committee on Consumer Affairs
~iday. .
"The rule as they have proposed.
it really doesn't do anything at all,
It's not going to mean anything
whatsoever, and it's just going to
waste a lot of people's time."
Under fire from Gov.-elect Mark
White, who promised during his
campaign to abolish the separate
fuel charge, the PUC has proposed a
new procedure to review the
charges in advance each month to
ensure that utilities don't include
excessive charges,
But even PUC Chairman Moak.
Rollins said the rule could cost con-
sumers more money.
Instead of passing the cost of gen-
erating fuel on automatically, the
commission would conduct hearings
for each company every three
months and the cost of those hear-
ings would be passed. along b cus-
lomers, Rollins said. .. .
"What I antiapate is that the ulti- said Sen. Lloyd Doggett, an Austin
mate cost of fuel will not be Democrat.
changed. I don't think there will be "The staff, looking back now, ad•
any substantial decease in the cost ~~ its approach was not as aggres-
of fuel," Rollins said. sive as it might have been," said
Butler, attorney for the .Texas Commissioner George Cowden..
Municipal League, contends the fuel
,~.
;•
adjustment charge has been abused _.
.
.
by utaUty companies, which he says
have passed on operating costs, de-
preciation expenses and even .
allowance f or profit to consumers. ~ ~ ' , ,,:
"Where we have everything but
the kitchen sink flowing through,
that's where the damage has been
done. Because of the rather fuzzy
distinction between fuel and fuel-
related costs, there seems to be an
inability for companies to separate .
those costs: There is an irresiatlble
temptation to: put it ;in the full ad-
' justment cl~rge." ~ ..
'Utility cominissionera were grilled
for~alrnost three hours by legislators
on the committee, wbo scolded ahem
foir neglecting, their, watchdog funs.
lion and'~procxa-atit~ting on i~por-
tant decisions.: • ~ ~ .~. .
The PUC staff was diirECt~d t'a
recommend changes in the fuel ad• .
justment charge in April 1979, but
nothing happened until last month,
r~
Texas Register
12/7/82
Proposed Rules
TITLE 16.ECONOMIC
REGULATION
Part II. Public Utility Commission of
Texas
Chapter 23. Substantive Rules
General
16 TAC 423.3
The Public Utility Commission of Texas proposes
amendments to 423.3, concerning definitions. The
definitions of fuel adjustment factor and fuel cost
factor will be deleted to agree with §23.23 of this title
(relating to Rate Structural.
John E. Cunningham, public utilities director, has
determined that for the first five-year period the rule
will be in effect there will be no fiscal implications to
state or local government as a result of enforcing or
administering the rule.
Mr. Cunningham has also determined that for each
year of the first five years the rule as proposed is fn
effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of en•
forcing the rule as proposed will be to avoid conf u-
nion, since the revisions in § 23.23 will make the
definitions unnecessary. There is no anticipated
economic cost to individuals who are required to com-
ply with the rule as proposed.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to
Carolyn E. Shellman, Secretary of the Commission,
7800 Shoal Creek Boulevard, Suite 450N, Austin,
Texas 78757.
The amendments are proposed under Texas Civil
Statutes, Article 144fic, § 16, which provides the
Public Utility Commission of Texas with the author-
ity to make and enforce rules reasonably required in
the exercise of its power and to make decisions with
respect to administering the provisions of the Public
Utility Regulatory Act or the rules of the commission.
§23.x. Ik~rtitions. The following words and terms,
when used in this chapter, shall have the following mean-
ings, unless the context clearly indjcates otherwise.
(Fuel adjustment. ~ factor-A computed number
which, when multiplied by the number ofkilowatt-hours
consumed by a customer during a billing period, will pra
duct a fuel adjustment charge to the customer. The total
of these charges to all customers is the dif ference in the
cost of fuel experienced by the utility during the calen-
dar month that most closely corresponds to the billing
period and the cost of fuel that would have been ex•
peritnced if the price of fuel had been equal to that price
stated in the tariff of the utility. The cost of furl may
include the cost of economy energy, hydroelectric energy,
and energy purchased from a qualifying facility, and tht
fuel cost component of purchased power. to addition,
on an interim basis until the Cnal order in the utility's
next rate case, the cost of fuel may include capacity or
demand-related costs for power purchased from a qualify-
ing facility, as defined in substantive Rule OS2.02
.OS.OSS(a}(l). During the utility's next rate case, interim
capacity or demand-mated cost components shall be
removed, if appropriate, and included in the utility's base
rafts.
[Fuel cost facto~~--A computed number which,
when multiplied by the number of kilowatt-hours con•
sumed by a customer during a billing period, will pro-
duce afuelcost charge to the customer. The total of these
charges to all customers is the cost of the fuel consumed
in generating energy by the utility during the calendar
month that most closely corresponds to the billing period.
The cost of furl may include the cost of economy energy,
hydroelectric energy, energy purchased from a qualify-
ing facility, and the fuel cost component of purchased
power. In addition, on an interim basis until the final
order in the utility's next rate case, the cost of fuel may
include capacity ordemand-related casts for power pur-
chased from a qualifying facility, as defined in substan•
five Rule OS2.02.OS.OS8(aKl). During the utility's next rate
case, interim capacity ordemand-related cost components
shall bt removed, if appropriate, and included in the util-
ity's bast rafts.]
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has
been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within
the agency's authority to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on November 29, 1982.
TRD-829011 Rhonda Colbert Ryan
Acting Secretary
Public Utility Commission of
Texas
Earliest possible date of adoption:
January 7, 1982
For further information, please call 15121458-0)00.
Records and Reports
~sTAC§23.>>
The Public Utility Commission of Texas proposes
amendments to 4 23.11, concerning general reports.
The request for information regarding a fuel cost factor
calculation for a given billing period will be deleted to
agree with changes in §23.23 of this title (relating to
rate structural, which will eliminate automatic fuel ad-
justment.
John E. Cunningham, public utilities director, has
determined that for the first five-year period the rule
will be in effect there will be no fiscal implications to
state or local government as a result of enforcing or
administering the rule.
Mr. Cunningham has also determined that for each
year of the first five years the rule as proposed is in
effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of en•
forcing the rule as proposed will be to avoid confusion,
since the revisions in § 23.23 will make the require-
ments unnecessary. There is no anticipated economic
cost to individuals why are required to comply with
the rule as proposed.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to
Carolyn E. Shellman, Secretary of the Commission,
7800 Shoal Creek Boulevard, Suite 450 N, Austin,
Texas 78157.
The amendments are proposed under Texas Civil
Statutes, Article 1446c, ~ 16, which provides the
Public Utility Commission of Texas with the authority
to make and enforce rules reasonably required in the
exercise of its power, and to make decisions with
respect to administering the provisions of the Public
Utility Regulatory Act or the rules of the commission.
X13.11. Genera! Reports.
(a)-(d) (No change.)
(e) Fuel Cost and Use Information. Copies of ail
presently effective and future fuel purchase or salt core~
traits or both shall bt available for examination or filed
with the commission on request. (Information, including
estimates and calculations, involved in calculating a fuel
cost factor for a givta billing period, shall be filed with
the commission by the fifth day of the billing period by
al! electric utilities including municipally owned electric
utilities.] In addition, each generating electric utility, in•
eluding municipally owned generating electric uti!sties,
shall file a monthly fuel report on a form prescribed by
the commission.
(f)-(p) (No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has
been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within
the agency's authority to adopt.
issued in Austin, Texas, on November 29, 1982.
TRD-8290) 2 Rhonda Colbert Ryen
Acting Secretary
Public Utility Comrniasion of
Texas
Earliest possible date of adoption:
January 7, 1983
For further information, please call (5121458-0100.
Rates
i6 TAC §23.23
The Public Utility Commission of Texas proposes
amendments to 423.23, concerning rate structure.
The proposed changes will eliminate the automatic
fuel adjustment and require formal commission ap-
proval of the fuel component in the charge for elec-
tricity through a quarterly filing by each generating
electric utility.
John E. Cunningham, public utilities director, has
determined that for the first five-year period the rule
will be in effect there will be fiscal implications as a
result of enforcing or administering the rule. The ef•
feet on state government will be an estimated addi-
tional cost of 81 million per year for the years
1983.1981. There is no anticipated effect on local
government.
Mr. Cunningham has also determined that for each
year of the first five years the rule as proposed is in
effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of en•
forcing the rule as proposed will be that closer scrutiny
and prior approval of fuel charges through this pro-
posalwill create a requirement for more efficient fuel
purchases by utilities.
The anticipated economic cost to individuals who are
required to comply with the rule as proposed will be
as follows. Delays in collecting revenues to cover fuel
costs may cause some increase in the working-capita!
requirement of electric utilities required to comply with
this rule. There wip also be variable costs for increased
administrative and legal needs. At present, however,
no dollar values can be assigned.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to
Carolyn E. Shellman, Secretary of the Commission,
7800 Shoal Creek Boulevard, Suite 450N, Austin,
Texas 18757.
The amendments are proposed under Texas Civil
Statutes, Article 1446c, § 16, which provides the
Public Utility Commission of Texas with the author-
ity to snake and enforce rules reasonably required in
the exercise of its power and to make decisions with
respect to administering the provisions of the Public
Utility Regulatory Act or the rules of the commission.
~1.~.13. Race Structure.
(a) (No change.)
(b) Rate design. '
(1 j (No change.)
(2y Effective April 1,1983, ao automatic (Anj
adjustment for recovering the cost of furl used in the
generation of electric power may be allowed in the tarif f
of electric utilities. Geaerating electric utilities shall be
Subject to the followiag requirements aad practduces.
(A) Within 15 days following Ibe close of each
calendar quarter, information required to calculate the
fuel component of its electric rates for the succeeding
quarter shall be filed by the utility on forms prescribed
by the commission. The first such filing shall be on or
before January 2S, 1983. The fuel romponeat shall be
approved quarterly by the commission.
(8) Each qua~cttrly tiling shah set forth the
estimated fuel costs to be incurred And the amount of the
over or underrecovery, if say, and shall set tomb speclN-
cally and in detail the basis upon which the utility coa•
tends that such costs should be allowed ie base rates. The
first tUlag ^eder this ruk slutU also include any over ar
underrecovery renlAiniag by virtue of terntlnatlon of the
uruity's fuel adjustment charge, The flung abdl,Also In•
elude any addtttonal data required by the coanmiaaton And
abAll be wpported by testimony sad An Affidavit executed
by An oifker or designated repreKntAtlve of the utllity
attattng:
R~ that the factual matters let forth in the
flung are true And correct And that the estlmAtes set forth
therein reflect the uttllty'a best eatlmAtea And Are mAde
to good faith; and
(!!) that the estimated fuel costs are
reasonable. The burden of proof shall be upon the utllity
to establish that the new fuel costs are reasonable and
Adjustments for any previous over or underrecovery Are
correct.
(C) All motions to intervene sbAll be filed
within 10 days from the date of the filing. If any such
motions for intervention are filed, the commission or
hearings examiner shall bold a hearing at 9 a.m, on the
fifth working day fo[Iowing this 10•day period at the com-
mission'soffices located at 780o Shoal Creek Boulevard,
Suite 4SON, Austin, to determine whether an interven-
tion will be granted or denied and to classify or con•
solidate the Intervenors for bearing purposes and to hear
any oilier motion concerning such proceeding, All pro•
tests shall be filed wtthtn 30 days from the date of the
flung And must set forth the grounds of the protest clearly
And specifically.
(D) The commission s6Ail act upon each
quarterly fllin~ within 4S days from receipt thereof by
final, Appadabk written order establishing such [ud com-
ponents as it deterrnlnesare reasonable and in compliance
with these rules. Such finding o[ reasonableness shall not
be binding on the commission or any party In subsequent
rate cases or Qroceedings relating to fuel costs and shall
not relieve the utility of its burden of proving in subse•
quent rate cases and proceedings that the amounts so
charged and collected are reasonable.
(E) Noibing In this subsection shall be con•
strued to allow An electric utllity to change the energy
component of the cost per kilowatt•bour charge which
was established in lbe utility's tarifis~in the most recently
approved general rate case, nor to deny to a uttttty the
rtgbt to recover nl1 fuel costs actually Incurred by them,
to the extent that same are found by the commission to
be reasonable, or to permit a utility to recover more than
16ose actual fuel costs which are found reasonable by the
commission.
(F} In the event an electric utility experknces
fuel curtailments, equipment failure, strikes, embargos,
sanctions, or other unforseen circumstances which would
substantially change its estimated operating conditions
And fuel costs, such utility shall have the right, at any
time, in the event of a substantial increase In fuel costs,
to submit as emergency reyuest for commlr,~on approval.
Any such request shall state why the utility is requesting
a change In the fuel component already tiled under the
quarterly pra~edure as net out In subparaYraphs (A)-{E)
of this paragraph and the magnitude of cbangt in fuel
costs that this occurrence wlll cause. In the event o[ a
substantial decrease to [ue! costs, the utility shall file s
similar emergency request for commission approval.
(C) The gwirterly fuel component abaU be
calculated u follows;
~} C '~ F~ - BR X LCF
S
(!!) C =Fuel component to cost per
kilowatt-hour.
(!u1 F =Estimated cast of fuel for the
calendar quarter. Tbla cost may also include the fuel por•
lion of the cost of purchased power, economy energy,
energy purchased frees a qualifying facility, bydroeiec-
tric energy, and other costs associated with generation
or purchased power As may be ordered by the commis.
sioa. Improper costa ue subject to exclusion by the
commission.
(!v~ A =The difference between the actual
fuel cost subject to recovery and actual revenue coUecied
from the fuel charge dpring the second preceding calen•
dal quarter.
(v1 S = Estimated~kUowatt•hour sales for
the cAlendAr quarter.
(vI) BR =Portion of the fuel component
included io the base nUe as determined in ilia utility's last
rate case.
(v!!1 LCF =The fuel component may be
adjusted according to the customer's service voltage or
the utility's loss correction factors if such An adjustment
bas been previously been approved by the commission
in a general rate proceeding.
(H) The asetbod and procedures for deterntin•
ing the fuel coropone~t as set forth herein sbAll be con•
taioed in the utility's tuff[. [when approved by the com-
mission provided that:
[(A) At the time of a rate hearing, the utility
shall have filed w%th the commission all requested fuel
contracts and cost data upon which such total fuel costs
are predicated with a schedule showing any adjustments
anticipated under current contracts;
[(B) The total cost of fuel per kilowatt-hour
{fuel cost facto) and/or purchased power {purchased
power adjustment. factor) is shown on the bill (provided
that the utility shall have the option of also showing on
the bill the total cost of fuel);
[(C) The items included in the cost of fuel arc
approved by the commission;
((D) Fuel costs billed shall be for fuel con•
sumed in th ~ generation of electric energy in the calen•
dar month that most closely corresponds to the billing
period; and .
[(E) The total fuel cost is applied equitably to
each customer's bill and is proportional to the number
of kilowatt-hours used. This shall be done by determin-
ing a fuel cost factor.
[(3) Items included in the cost of fuel will be
reviewed on a regular basis by the commission, and im•
proper charges shall be disallowed, tf such charges are
disallowed, the utility shall provide appropriate refunds
to affectrd customers as directed by order of the
commission.
[(4) Each electric utility shall maintain a monthly
record of the cost of fact used in the generation of elec•
tricity which is included or will be included in customer
rates. Such record.shall show at each month end the iotal
cost (actual or estimate) of fuel consumed for that month
and on a cun~ulativr basis, and the total dollar amount
of revenues resulting from the furl cost eomponcnt in
customer rates. Any difference between the total cost of
Fuel consumed and the amount of revenues resulting from
~~the fuel cost component ~ customer rata shall be credited
or charged to the customers in the next billing month.
((S) An adjustment for recovering the cost of
economy energy purchased pursuant to a sale between
different electric utilities may, at the commission's discre-
tion, be allowed in the tariff of the purchasing utility.
((6} If the fuel cost revenues exceed the fuel cost
by 10% in any given month and the total fuel cost rev
enues have exceeded total fuel~costs by the total S.OR~
or morn for the most recent 12•month period, the utility
shall so advise the commission.
((7) A 10% penalty shall be applied to excessive
collections about the actual fuel costs for any given
month. For any month in which a utility over•recovers
actual fuel costs by 10% or more and has over-recovered
by S.0% or more for the 12-month period ending with
such month, such ovcrcollections shall be deemed to be
excessive pnless otherwise found by order of the
commission.
[(8) lvo penalties for excessive collections shall
be applied to those electric utilities which have been
granted a fuel adjustment clause which expliatly considers
changes in the efficiency of generation. In addition,
utilities applying such an efficiency-based fuel adjustment
clause shall be exempt from calculating adjustments for
over and under-collection in the manner set forth in
paragraph (4) of this subsection.]
(3) Noageneradng electric utilities purchasing off
of their power and energy requirements from other elec-
tric utilities under rates set by this commission andlar
the ~ Feden~l Energy Regulatory Commission shalt be
allowed to recover the total cost of sorb power and energy
when approved by the commission provided that:
(A) each utility shall file no later than
February 1, 1983:
(f) the amount of purchased power cost per
kilowatt-hour sold that is recovered io the utility's base
rates currently npproved by the commission; and
(ft) an adjustment to be included in the
utility's tariff far recovering any difference between the
actual cost of purchased power and the purchased power
cost included in the base rates.
(B) each nongeneratiag electric utility shall
maintain a monthly record of the cost of purebased power
wbicb is included or will be included in customer rates.
Such record shall show at each month end the total cost
(actual or estimate) of power purchased for that month
and on a cumulative basis, and the total dollar amount
of revenues resulting from the purchased power cost com-
ponents in customer rases. Any difference between the
total cost of purcbasied power and the amount of revenues
cesuiting From the purchased paver roes components in
costumer rates shall be credited or charged to the
customers in the next bUliug month.
(Cj if the purchased power cost revenues eY•
ceed the purchased porrer coal.by lo% In my given month
and the total purc6AKd power coat revenues bare ex•
epeded total purchased power costs by the total of S.0%i
or more for the most recent 12-month period, the uWlty
shall :o advlae the coromfssfoo.
(D) A 10%i penalty shall be applied to ex•
eemfve collectfoas above the actual purchased power costs
for any gives month. For say month is wbicb a utUity
over-recoren actual purchased power costs by 10% or~
more aed bu over-recovered by 5.0% or more for the
~2•moAtb period ending with such moatb, such over-
eolkcttoosshall be deemtd to be~ excessive ualess other-
wise sound by order of the commission.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has
been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within
the agency's authority io adopt. ~
Imued iA Austin, Texas, on November 29, ) 982.
TAD-829013 Rhonda Colbert Ryan
Secrotary y
Public Utility Commission of
Texas
Earliest possible date of adoption:
January 7, 1983
For further information, please call !5121458-0104.
.COMMENTS OF TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE REGARDING
PUC PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE FUEL ADJUSMENT CLAUSE RULE
r~
u
I. Per etuation of "Fuel" Passthrou h
s
Presumably, amendments to Commission
Substantive Rules
052.02.03.033, .052.02.01.013, and .052.02.04.046 have been
proposed~~ to respond to~ public outcry against the "fuel" adjust-
ment clause.. The proposed ;changes dis la a fundamental mis-
P Y
.,
understanding of the nature of the public outcry. The ublic~
P
,opposes passthroughs; and cosmetic changes requiring additional
. ~ _ ~~
paperwork which merely conceal underl in assthrou hs d
y g p g o not
meet the legitimate concerns of the public.
Although the Fublic Utility Commission has known of the
widespread abuse of the fuel ad'ustment clau '
~ se since at least
1979, the Commission has thus far failed to h '
c ange its rules to
eliminate such. abuses., The changes proposed in this rulemakin
g
proceeding are too late and too little.
the proposed changes to the Commission's rules
merely
..
require the filing of documents and a Commission order
every
calendar quarter. Utilities will still collect amounts estimated
for the future and will refund overcollections. Thus utilit;P~
will still pass through to customers all amounts characterized b
Y
the utilities as "fuel" as automatically as before. Because the
utilities will be permitted to pass through all "fuel" amounts as
,booked, they will have no incentive to hold
down such charges.
The proposed rule will not cure the roblem cited b
P y Governor
Elect White, the lack of incentive to hold down costs. The
proposed rule merely adds additional paperwork, more. rate case
expenses and a facade of due process.
The proposed amendments do nothing to stop the current
practice of~passing many nonfuel charges .through. the fuel adjust-
ment clause under strained, definitions of the term "fuel." Thus,
profit, interest, depreciation, operating and. maintenance; ex-
enses, administrative and general expenses, depletion,. taxes,
P
wages, royalties, delay .rentals, ~office~.supply expense, and-
innumerable other ex enses of the utility or its affiliates which
P
should be included in base rates are passed thraugh as "fuel."
~II. Inadequacy of Texas Utilities Company. Quarterly- Filing
The proposed changes to the Commission' s rules appear to be
modeled .after. the "fuel" adjustment clause which was adopted for
Texas Utilities Company after a~ district court: overturned -the
action of the Public Utility Commission in the Texas. Utilities
"affiliated transactions" case. In the "affiliated transactions"
o
proceeding, various cooperatives and cities challenged numerous
abuses of the fuel adjustment clause, such as the passthrough of
accelerated depreciation, which was prohibited~by the Commis-
sion' s rules, and the passthrough of interest paid to affiliates
at a rate increased at will by the utilities, without Commission
approval, in order to supplement Commission awarded revenue
increases deemed inadequate by the utility. ~~
The Texas Utilities "fuel" adjustment clause was adopted
after the district court found that Texas Utilities practice of
-2-
^ i
collecting affiliated payments throw h the "fuel" ad'
g ~ustment
clause was unlawful because Section 4
. 1(c) (1) of the Public.
Utility Regulatory Act re wires that aff' '
q iliated payments be found
reasonable by the PUC before they are collected from customer ~~
s.
In' that case the court did not abolish the fuel ad'u
~ strnent
clause, nor did the Commission abolish the fuel ad'ustmen
~ t clause
in response to such decision., Therefore identica~
. 1 Commission
. action in this case should n
of be held out to the .public as
"abolition of the fuel ad`ustment clause "
7
However, the first Texas Utilities Com
pany quarterly hearing .
.on its new "fuel" adjustment clause is
. an important precedent,
because it demonstrated that such a roceedin •
p g will not provide
any meaningful scrutiny or control by this Commission ove
r
amounts utilities charge their customers throw h th
g e fuel ad~ust-
ment clause. .The first T.U. request merel stated th
Y e total
dollars and the dollars per mmbtu sought to be aased th
p rough
with no information regarding the nature of an underl i
Y . y ng costs
and no information upon which a findin of
g reasonableness could
be based. The Companies subsequently filed a six a e sta
p g tement
which was totally inadequate to support a findin of reaso
g nable-
ness.
. The General Counsel and the Hearing Examiner roceeded on
P
the basis that the Companies' request is resum tivel
P p y reasonable
and found it irritating that the cities demanded a heari
ng at
which the Companies would be required to rove the asst
P p hrough
reasonable based on legally admissible evidence sub'ect
~ to
-3-
cross-examination. The Examiner and the General Counsel did not
a ree that such a hearin was .required. Nevertheless, the
g g
~~ Examiner reluctantl conducted a hearing. However, the Examiner
Y .
made it clear that no art of the Companies' request would ~be~ ~~
P
excluded from assth.rou h based only on cross-examination!
P g
Elaborate and ex ensive artici ation by others, including formal
P P P
discovery, pleading, and expert testimony, will be~required to
limit the passthrough in any way. Otherwise, requested amounts
will be assed throu h as automatically as~before. Such e~labor-
P 9
ate artici ation would be rohibitively expensive if required
P P P
' ever ear for ever electric ~ utility, as ,under- the ~~~~
four times y y Y
osed amendments to the Commission's rules. The burden of
prop
elaborate and ex ensive roceedings is not felt by the utilities
P P
due to their substantial resources; and the fact that they pass
such costs on to their customers.
Further, the examiner's report on the first Texas Utilities
m an Jilin recommended that in future proceedings, pass-
Co p y ~ g
throughs be ordered without a hearing unless a written statement
'f in all objections to the roposed passthrough is filed
specs y g ~ P
within 15 days of the filing of a request for passthrough. The
filin itself merely states the total dollars and the dollars per
g
mmbtu sought to be passed through with no information regarding
th nature of an underl in costs and no information upon which
e Y Y g
a f finding of reasonableness could be based. Obviously, customers
cannot find out if they have objections to such a request if
there is no~hearing. Thus, catch 22 - you can't have a hearing
-4-
~. ~ ~ ~
if you don' t file written objections, but ou can' t find out ~if
Y
you have. objections without a hearing. Thus, customers are 1 f
et
where they were before - with no means of aski
ng questions about
amounts they are required to pay through the fuel adjustment
clause and no means of ..opposing passthroughs. ,~ ~ ,
The Texas Utilities Compan ~ex erience demonstrate
Y P s how
. easily procedures which give the appearance o~f affordin control
g
over passthroughs are rendered impotent and become a~mere sham
.,
when the Commission. and its staff have no~enthusiasm for the
task.
III. Mismatch
The proposed rule also does not, cure the serious.mismatch~~
and overrecovery resultin from considerati
. g on of only one aspect.
of a company' s operations. Typicall , ~ fuel costs increase
Y .on a
per kilowatt hour basis when sales are abnormally~hi h and
g
consequently the utility burns more gas and oil. .However, when
sales are abnormally high, revenues from base rates are also
abnormally high; and thus profit paid b customers throw h b
Y g ase
rates is also abnormally .high. Thus, extra profits offset
increased fuel costs. During a hot summer, when kilowat .
t . hour
sales are very high, both the fuel cost factor and the com an 's
P Y
earnings or profits are very high. The fuel adjustment clause,
requires customers to pay both the extra rof its and '
P the in-
creased fue 1 cosh. To eliminate this problem, fuel costs should
be included in base rates which should be based on a
matched
..
historical test year. which takes into considera '
tion all
-5-
' i ..
components of the utilities' cost to serve, including capital
costs and fuel costs. ~ In. this way, ~ when sales are greater than
assumed in a utility's last ratemaking proceedings excess profits
due to increased revenues will~be off set by increased fuel costs.'
IV. Elimination of Se orate Statement of Passthrou h on~Cus-
tomers' Bi11s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
The Commission. has also proposed in its amendment to Sub-~
stantive Rule 052.fl2.04.046 that utilities be .prohibited from
se aratel listin -the "fuel" .passthrough on custamersbills.
P y g
This is a no res onse to customers'~outcry against passthroughs
P
is an effort to conceal assthroughs from thepublic.~
but rather P
"Fuel" char es should: not be given the appearance of being
g
included in base rates unless they are in fa ~ made a part of
es ~ So lon as we have a "fuel" passthrough in addition
base rat g
to base rates we should not fear letting the ratepayer know it.
TML. opposes this subterfuge.
V. ~ . Elimination of Penalt for Habitual Overcl~ar e
_~.
The ro osed amendments to Rule 052.02.03.033 also eliminate
P P
the enalt for habitual overcollection of amounts passed through
P Y
the fuel adjustment clause. Because utilities get the use of
customers' money until overcollections are calculated and re-
funded, the utilities have every incentive to overcharge. Under
the existing fuel adjustment clause rule, customers receive a
t
credit for overcharges during the next billing month. Under the
n ed b the ro osed amendments, custamers receive a
rule as cha g y p P
credit for overcharges in the second succeeding quarter. Thus,
-6-
.
~ ~~ • ~
LJ
under the proposed amendments to the rule, utilities will et the
g
use of customers', money for six months rather than one month.
Thus, utilities have even more incentive to overcharge. Elimina-
tion of the penalty provision eliminates the one small incentive
utilities have under the existing rule to limit overchar es.~
g
VI. TMI,~ Recommendation
By action of its Member Cities and Board of Dir
ectors, TML
has proposed legislation to completely eliminate the fuel ad'ust-
ment.clause except with respect to increases in fuel and ur-
p
chased power payments to unaffiliated entities caused b a chap e
Y g
in price set by a regulator bod~. Such a statu '
Y Y to would permit
~ the passthrough of increased fuel charges only .in the limited
situation in which it is justifiable. When a utilit ex '
y periences
a fuel or purchased power cost increase b r a '
y e son of action of a
state or federal regulatory agency., the utility has ver little
Y
control over the price increase.
Fuel adjustment clause passthrough of affiliated transac-
tions should be prohibited. In that instance the utilit ha
~ y s an
incentive to seek increases in prices paid to its affiliate
supplier, whether the prices are set by the affiliate and utili
ty
or a regulatory agency, and no incentive to hold down the rice
P
paid to the affiliated supplier.
The passthrough of increased fuel costs associated with
increased sales creates a serious mismatch and should not be
allowed. When, during hot summers increased
fuel costs per
kilowatt hour are caused b hi h sales excess rofit
Y g p s offset
-?-
increased fuel costs. In that instance, the fuel adjustment
clause results in excessive profits to utilities.- ~.
TML does not deem requiring expensive quarterly filings,
which would be cosmetic and would not cure the problems of the
fuel adjustment clause, an adequate response to public outcry
against the fuel adjustment clause. TML urges the prohibition of
the passthrough of any amounts other than regulated, unaffiliated
charges absent a full blown rate case. The proposed rule must be
.,
viewed only as an effort to ~ head of f legitimate efforts to .,make .
responsible -revisions to the fuel adjustment clause.
~2 ~~~ .
~~
DON R. BUTLER
r- ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~~~~
. GRACE HOPK NS CASSTEVENS
ATTORNEYS FOR TEXAS t~iUNICIPAL
LEAGUE
-g-
' ':~.~{r;Y.. ..' '~.''
11ff '
'
_ . • .
r.. . .
q~ --- ---
~~.
~~4:•
i.~~ ' ~ s,
~, . Mayor •
. :~s:: .
::t:~ ' ' ~. A:,'
• ~ • y Manager ~ ' . . .
• , , Department Head
+~
' .i•
RJR;. ,;1,. 'i:•'...:'.• .
~~•~~.
r,f'.
• :;.' ,
' :~ ; 5,
,' f • yr ~~'.. ~ p
..~
v z~c -
r,
•~. r: • • r5:•
• •ir
~. • Mayor
. ~~~>>• .
:. ~:.
. :;;:
::~ ~ ~ Cit Manager ~ ~~ . • • •
• ~•,~..~,,,~;~ Department Head
• lij::j•~;:::~•~ '~:•:
~:
•i ~••.
~ ~lI~J••
• .•r''! i
• . :1'. P.
ws ~J• . '~
. ;.;,•.. ;.r~~S~,;js.,~~ .~ ,
".
~+
.\~ r',
..~::: r~
• . • .ti+.:
' ~ •~C}~ .
• M.~~Yi '
ti,
~ :; ~ ,. .
,,i.;1 r ~ ..;4:
•...
....
...., . ~ ,
' • ~. •
s
• i
• ' ~.,'r
•
~
:. :.. ,.
'.
.. w .
,.
. ..
r
a
, ,
. ..
.. ~ '°
~.' .
, .., star of th ~ k~ o _
~~ ~~~
A~. ~ .
a et~o ex
~..
r :.
~ ~~..
. :
~
:.
}
.
.
u ,
.
rx . . "h ~ dw,. J ~" . , ! L ; ~~~ ~` A ~ (• T S. rr I' ,1 .{ ,; 4 i
: (~ ~.i! r' 1 ~~
' rA
~{ .~. /1 ~!'
•
'fi
C
~
1
y ,
,~M ' ~ +tv:
•. *'
,
~
}}
r . ~?~P}~
~N y
~I1 41.
t.~ "u .'1Ajr4{L • sF~ .. 1~= l
p
,
'SI' .1 H` ,Y: i R~^~~a a~S ~:~ 1 ~ aif: .1~'~a YA.- YF ~s•„';F ~.L FM~d^ av r ", J~
v ' (. ,.fit ~r .~' Yew F .,+ -
.. ,. .
ti.
" ; ,
~.
e r ..
Cf • ... F
t
. -
r ;.
~,
.
a
~ ' '
~ . ~ ,1.. ~..~ { . ~~: ~ ^.
THE STATE OF TEXAS ~ i
` 1,
'
•
r
,,p
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. ~
~ ~ ~ ~.
•~
i' ...
~„ 1 1
. ~ ~ ., ..
,
~;
~ ~
~
~ ~ rT0
~
:
,
~
..1
,, , ,
,
z ~
_ .
~ y'~, ° •'
,: ~ '. ..
{ ..; ..
NOVIS STEPHENS'
~ ,
~ ~.• . !M
.. ,~ .
~ ,~ a N
.1 ~ , gut F~, .~,,:~`~ ', .. ~ ~
.
`~
+
,,
..
„ ... ; :. .
..
.. :. r ~ .. , ~ ~ w+ .
.., ..
IN RECOGNITION OF- FIVE YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE
- y
.
~
.~ .~ _ , +
_ ,1
~
~
1
FIRE ~`~~
. TO THE CITY IN THE ~ ~~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ DEPARTMENT.
.'
.:
.
' „ ~t
_ '{
DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TEXAS
THIS 1 ~~'~~~
,
,
-
- •r{:;
~<
DAY OF J~vARY, _1983 ~ ~'
r 1
LJ
• if "~ 4
•
Mayor ~ ~'~
.~ :~;
~ •. •~•'ti
y Manager ~ ~' ~•. ~.. •
Department Head
r. ~.:••:.•~ : .
r+
+ .~Yy•• ,• r•~•..,,.
' ,:~::
' •' 1.1
1
DATE: January 10,_1983
- ,_
SUBJECT: ~ '
. ~.
---
DEPARTMENT: Administra 'on
BACKGROUND: There is one vacancy on the Park and Recreation Commission at this
time. Councilman~Richard Davis has recommended the a ointment of
Mr. Howard Nix to fill this vacanc
. .,
.,
~-
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ~ Approve Disa rove
~~'DF'~FD IT~~:: YES NO
`.`_~._____ N/A
~CGOUNT NUMBER:
^ v
LJ
City of North ~iichland dills
star of the~l~Ietroplex
T0: Rodger Line DATE: January 6, 1983
City Manager
FROM: Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Platting & Zoning Cases for City Council January 10, 1983
PS 82-62 Request of Alco Development Company for
APPROVED by P & Z replat of Lots 4R-6R, Block 14, North
Hills Addition.
PS 82-64 ~ Request of Earl C. Baker for Short Form
DENIED by P & Z Platting of Lot 1, Block 1, Earl Baker
Addition.
PS 82-65 Request of BWBM Partnership for final
APPROVED by P & Z plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Castle 1~'inds
Addition.
PZ 82-28 Request of John L. Gray & Tom Campbell
APPROVED by P & Z to rezone Lot 4R, Block 1, North
(9 were contacted Edgl ey Addition, from its present
classification ~of Local Retail to a
proposed classification of Commercial-
Specific Use-Auto Laundry.
This property is located on Edison Drive
and is bounded on the East by RB Furniture
and International House of Pancakes.
PZ 82-30 ~ Request of North Texas Dining, Inc. to
APPROVED by P & Z rezone Lot 4, Block 1, Carder Addition,
~6 were contacted} from its present classification of Local
Retail to a proposed classification of
Local Retai 1-Specific Use-Sale of
Alcoholic Beverages.
This property is located at the Southeast
corner of Airport Freeway and Blackfoot
Trail (the old Bonanza Restaurant}.
PZ 82-31 Request of Joe Parton, Parton's Pizza, to
APPROVED by P & Z rezone a portion of Lot 1, 6]ock 6, Snow
~2 were contacted) Heights North Addition, from its present
classification of Local Retail to a proposed
classification of Local Retail -Specific Use-
Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.
This property is located on the East side of
Rufe Snow Drive and i s approximately 264 ft.
North of Lewis Drive.
X817) 281.0041 l 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. 0. BOX 186091 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118
y Page 2
PZ 82-34 Request of Danny D. Jeffries to rezone
APPROVED by P & Z Tracts 1B & 1B1, Abstract I46, William
D. Barnes Survey, from their present
classification of Agriculture to a
proposed classification of 1F-9-One
' Family Dwellings.
This property i s 1 ocated on the East
side of Smithfield Road at the inter-
section of Evergreen Avenue and
Smithfield Road.
PZ 82-35 Request of Ray McElroy to rezone Lot A,
APPROVED by P & Z B1 ock 9, Richland Heights Addition, from
~6 were contacted} its present classification of local
Retail to a proposed classification of
Commercial.
This property i s 1 ocated on the East side
of Booth Calloway Road and i s approximately
192 feet North of the intersection of
Booth Calloway Road and G1 envi ew Drive.
PZ 82-37 Request of BW'Bs~ Partnership to rezone
APPROVED by P & Z Tracts 2B4 & 2B6, Abstract 1588, J. M.
X39 were contacted} Vandusen Survey, from their present
classification of Local Retail to a
r proposed classification of P~ulti-Family.
This property has a 416.60 f.t. frontage
on the 41est side of Rufe Snow Drive at
.the intersection of Mi ke~ Street and ~~anor
Avenue and extends ~Jestward ,1279.4 f t„
and the back 479.4 f t. extend s ~ South a
distance of 1164 ft. to Glenview Drive.
PZ 82-38 Request of R. C. Breakell Holdings, Inc.
APPROVED by P & Z to rezone portions of Tracts 1C & 1D,
~6 were contacted} Abstract 1588, J. ~~. vandusen Survey,
from their present classifications of
Multi -Family and Local Retail to a
proposed classification of Corunercial.
This property i s 1 ocated at the Northwest
corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Northeast
Loop 820.
n
u
`~
DATE: January 6, 1983 f
sUBJECT:. PS 82-62 Re 1 at of Lots 4R-6R, 61 ock 14, North Hi 11 s Addition'
DEPARTMENT: Plannin and Zonin
BACKGROUND: This ro ert i s 1 ocated on the south side of Bewl a Street and is
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.
'm tel 150 feet east of Tourist Drive.
' i to abandon the exi sti n sewer 1 i ne and .its easement on Lot 4.
' 1 i n a 1 on the rear 'of the 1 ots . ~A1 so the
_c. 's bein revised. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
. ~~
i n r' s or~nents .
• i
The P1 anni ng and Zoning ,Commission recommended approval of this repl at subject to the
Engineer's comments.
...___. .
CITY CaUNCiL ACTION REQUIRED: A royal or denial of re lat.
~E.~DGETED ITF.~i : YF S NG x
_.~
~~ C4UNT NUMBER
~r....•air.~~.~.err.a~.~.w+~...~..r~r.wuw.r~ir.r~.rr~r ~.rrr-r~~.~.~-.~.r~..~.~~~r~~~~~~r ~r~~~wr/rr~~r~rrMrr~r~~1 ~Ay M~rM~~~1~wY~~rrr~rwr
~ -~
• s
i~•
/..
•-..
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
DECEMBER 21, 1982 - 1:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
i
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF THE SPEC I~AL MEET I~NG OF
OCTOBER 21, 1982
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
OCTOBER 28, 1982
CONSIDERATION OF THE M INUT
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
N011EMBER 4, 1982
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR - TINS OF
NOVEMBER 18, 2
CONSIDER SON OF THE MINUTES
OF THE ECIAL MEETING OF
DEC R 9, 1982
~' The meetin was called to order b the
9 y
Chairman, George Tucker, at 1:40 P. M
PRESENT:
CHAIRh~AN George Tu r
SECRETARY Marjori ash }
MEMBERS ~ Don en
Ma Hannon
k Wood
ALT. MEMBER ~ John Schwinger
ASST. DiR OF P~!/ Al l en Bronstad
P & Z COORD I NA Wanda Ca 1 vert
Ms. Nash ed, seconded by Mr. Bowen, to
approve a minutes as written. This
moti o carr~,ed ~ 5-0.
. Hannon moved, seconded by Mr. Wood, to
approve the minutes as ~ wri tten. Thi s
motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mr. Wood, to
approve the minutes as written. Thi s
motion carried 5-O ,with Mr. Hannon abstaining.
Ms. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Hannon, to
approve the minutes as written. Thi s
motion carried 5-0.
I
Ms. Nash moved, seconded-by Mr. Gowen, to
.approve the minutes as written. This
motion carried 5-0.
Chairman Tucker stated .,that at the request ~
of the apnl i cant, Al co Devel onment~ Company,
item #7, PZ 82-33, ~~ill be postponed until ~
January 2l, 1983.
1.
PS 82-62 Request of Alco Development Company for
replat of Lots 4R-6R, Block 14, North
Hills Addition.
Ms. Calvert stated due to the illness of
Mr. Allison, there would be no one to
present this request.
~,.
-• ,
.,
~. ~.
t
i
Page 2
P & Z minutes
December 21, 1982
PS 82-62
APPROVED
C
The Chairman said since this was a replat
i n Single Family zoning, there would need
to be a Public Hearing. He opened the
Public Hearing and called for those wishing
.,
to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward .
There being no one wishing to speak, the
.. Chairman called for those wishing to speak
i n opposition to this request to please
come forward.
Norma Rhodes, 3628 Wendell Drive, came
forward. She asked since this is at the
end of Wendell Drive, what was planned for
this plat.
Mr. Tucker said the present zoning i s for
single family homes.
Mr. Bronstad said the reason for this
replat was they are abandoning the sewer
on lot and~are going to run it down
behind he 1 ot.
Ms . Rhodes asked i f i t was sti 11 going to
be three lots .
Mr. Tucker said it would be.
Mr. Hannon stated the other case on the
agenda for Alco Development Company is
adjacent to this property, it is not this
property.
The Thai rman closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Bowen asked about the City Engineer's
comment about the existing 8" water line
being located outside the existing easement.
Mr. Bronstad said that was correct and the
city will move the line probably next week.
Mr. Hannon asked if the city would need
additional easements.
Mr. 6ronstad said they would not.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 82-62
subject to the Engineer's comments. This
motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the
motion carved 5-0.
.,
r
C C
Delbert R. Stembridye
consulting enflineer
December 14, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
1301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hi11s, Texas 16118
Re: Lots 4R-6R, Block 14, NORTH
HILLS ADDN, Replat.
In response to Knowlton-.English-Flowers letter dated December
13, 1982, we offer the follwing comments:
1. This item refers to a City staff function.
2. The current zoning (IF-9) has been added to the plat.
r 3. The water line and easement were in existence prior to the
developer ever purchasing the property; if the location needs
to be verified, we feel that this is the responsibility of
the City.
4. The Developer agrees to install a Fire Hydrant to provide
fire protection for these three lots.
5. The Developer agrees to plug the existing sanitary sewer line
at the south end of Lot 4-R and at the north side of Bewley St.
If there are any further questions regarding these lots, please
do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
f
e ert R. Stem ri ge P E.
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager .
Mr Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
3729 Flory • North Richland Hllls • 76118. (817) 284-7363
,s
,~ ~
~~:
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
December 13, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
1301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Nil l s, Texas 16118
Re: 3-934, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
NORTH HILLS ADDN. LOTS 4R-6R, BLOCK 14
PS 82-62 REPEAT GRID 155
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the fol 1 owi ng comments :
1. All utility companies should be advised of this replat.
2, We would request that the current zoning CIF-9~ be shown on the
plat.
3. The City's water and sewer grid map Sheet 155 shows that the
ex~st~ng 8-inch water line which crosses through Lot 6 may be located
outside the•existing•utility easement. We would request that the
exact l ocat~ on of the s water 1 i ne be verified to determine i f
an additional easement i s required,
4. We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has
not been provided for this development,
5. The existing sanitary sewer 1 ine crossing Lot 4-R which i s to be
abandoned should be plugged on the south end of Lot 4-R and also
on the north side of Bewley St.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivison,
please do not hesitate to call.
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. ~ BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267.3367
~ .
DATE: 1-7-83
If
i•
SUBJECT: PS $2-64 Short Form~Platting of Lot 1, Block 1, Earl Baker Addition
,~
~_
DEPARTMENT: rlanning and coning ,
BACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Amundson at Eden Road.
. , , ~ ,.
Mr, Baker wanted to add onto his house and his pro ert had not been latted. We
required him~to plat his propert
,.
~~
The corrections have not been made to the lat.
~~The Planning and Zonin Commission, denied this lat because it did not meet the
re uirement.for A ricultural zonin since there was or:l 0.7b acre of land
• ._
Mr, Baker should re uest a zonin Chan e,
The Staff recommends approval of this plat because the building was~in existence prior
to adoption of the zoning ordinance. This ordinance provides that property in existence
prior to adoption of the ordinance is exempt from the 2 acre minimum size lot requirement.
The Staff will work with the applicant to get the engineering comments met,
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of plat.
BUDGETED ITEM: YE5 NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: NIA ~ ~ ~~
'~'~/
w~~~~~.riwr~~wM~~~w~~~r~~~~r~~.~.~~r~w~~ ~~r~~~rr~~~~~~~~~r~~~r.~~ ~r~~~~rrw~~.r~r~r~.w~r~.~~~~~w~rr~-~~~~~..~w~
' Page 3 "
~
P & Z Mi nutes ~ ~
December 21, 1982
f 2. PS 82-64 Re nest of Earl C. Bak
q er for Short Forrn
Platting of Lot 2, Block 1, French
Addition ~prev. submitted as Earl baker
Addition.
Mr. Bronstad stated Mr. Baker nor his
engineer were able to~be present, but
they requested approval of this plat.
Mr. Hannon said he understands this plat
does not meet the requirement for
Agricultura] zoning and he could not see
how the Commission could approve this lat.
p
PS 82-54 Mr. Hannon made the motion to den -
y PS 82 64.
DENIED This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and
the motion to deny carried 5-0.
3. PS 82-65 Request of Bti~16M Partnershi for final
p pla
of Lot 1, B1 ock 1, Castle Winds Addi ti o
The Chairman stated he had several a nests
q
. to.speak regarding this f~nai p , but he
said unl ass the s was a reel a n Si ngl e
. Family zoning, they do not ~ ve a Public
~~ Hearing. Chairman Tuck said there is a
~
zoning request on thi
roperty later on
this agenda which ryone will have a
chance to speak. a stated the only way
the Comma ss i o oul d deny a plat i s i f i t
does not me. the Subdivision Ordinance.
The C. rman asked i f there were any
~
co
nts from the Corr~nission members.
here were none.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 82-65.
Owen D. Long, Consulting Engineer, came
forward , He said they had received the City
Engineer's comments and have submitted a
rebuttal letter. Mr. Lon said the fee]
9
Y
~
they can comply with the Engineer s requests.
Mr, Tucker asked if the plat could be used
for Local Retail zoning.
Mr. Long said it could. He said the platting
of this property has nothing to do with the
{ zoning.
4
~ r fir`
~'Y
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
December 13, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hi ] 1 s
1301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hi 11 s, Texas 16118
Re: 3-938,_ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
EARL BAKER ADDN. LOT 1 BLOCK 1
FRENCH ADDN. PS 82-64, SHORT FORM PLAT,
GRID 11
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. Since this proposed plat is adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1, of the French
Addition, we would recommend that this plat name be changed from the
"Earl Baker Addn." to Lot 2, B1 ock 1, of the French Addition.
t
2. Since this plat has been submitted under the Short Form P1 atti ng
format we wi 1 l not comment on engineering considerations regarding
this development.
3. Utility companies should be consulted regarding any easements which
they may require to serve this development.
4. The zoning for this property should be shown on the map .
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdi vi son,
please do not hesitate to call.
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ 1 j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Brons tad , Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 •817/263.6211 • METRO/267-3367
,~ ` f
~,
(;
\~
C
~' I~o~
i ~i
C, ~~~ A Q
~0
S ~ r/ 2°~y
p 55•L
~~J ~ / ,
.~
0
w
I
H
~,=~ ;
S FOOT EASEMENT FOR ELECfRI¢„~y„
DISTRIBUTION FAGLITIES, AS SHOWN
„N THE AAAI~IFD SIfE~CH.
C~wr,~r ~ n~v~~o ~r:
P
~I~. ~ I'~~~. RRG rr
G. RK
~ Ea
8$ DH An~undsAn ~v-'.
,~/ort,ti k~~nt~nd ~;fls, 1e"xas 7'(o~8d
~/~s~' ~9
1
N
~b~a I
5~ M
t
~,
}
t
3
f
~..
~..
-.
r
~'
F
s
~ r
/~ i
n' S,
~~ 3
~~ . 4 ~
b f L
1 f ~ r•
o ~S ~v . !
1
G ~, f. ~ I
G ~ Y`'
~ d
a ~' d .
1 ~ A
P ~
G~ ~n~
~ fh ~
5°~ ~
a~
r
s~~~~ -
~ ~~
• DATE:_ January .6, 1.9,83
•
.,
. .
., .
.:, .
• •.
SUBJECT: PS 82-65 Final Plat of Lot 1 61 ock 1 C~astl a 4~i nds Addition •
.,
~. ,. .~.'
.
DEPARTMENT: Planni and Zonin .•
,.
. ... Y.
-. BACKGROUND; This ro ert ~~s~ 1 oca~ted ~ on the 1~1e~st ~*side of Rufe Snow D.ri ve~ at the intersection
.. ti, - - .
..~ Drive and Manor ~ Ave~nue:~~ ., ..,, .~.~. .. b~. , i:,:, . _, . ; ... .~
a
..
.. ~,
. a re d to all the En ~ Weer' s' comments ~.' ~~~ ~~
Th have e
f
' {
The P1 anni n and Zoni n Corti ssion recor~mended approval of this f i nal plat subject to the
• - ~.
.. ~ En i Weer' s comments . - . •~ . ,, . , ..
. ~ .
, -~
..
•.
..
T
• . ' ~
• • ' , •
• • • ~
~ •
' . •
~r~~
CYTY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: A royal or denial of final lat.
z~1~DGETED ITII~I: ~~ YF.S NO X '
.•
ACCOUNT NUMBER: ~ .
~w~~.~.~r~r~r~~~~r~~r~~.~~~r~w~~w~.~~r~~~.~~~~r~~r~r~~~.~~rw r~~rw~~~r~r ~.~~~r~~w ~ ~..~~r rw~~~~~w~rw ~r~~~+-~ww~wr~~
~ ~ <
y,
Page 3
t
~"
P & Z Minutes
December 21, 1982 ~.
2. PS 82-64 Re uest of Ear] C. Bak
q er for Shor m
Patting of Lot 2, Block 1, F
Addition (prev. submitte Earl Baker
Addition}.
Mr. Brons tated Mr. Baker nor hi s
engi -were able to be present, but
requested approval of this plat.
Mr. Hannon said he understands this plat
does not meet the requirement for
Agricultural. zoning and he could not see
how the Commission could approve this lat.
p
PS 82-64 Mr. Hannon made the motion to den PS 82-64.
y
DENIED Th ~ s mots on was seconded by Mr. Gowen and
the motion to deny carried 5-0.
3. PS 82-65 Request of BLalBM Partnershi for f'
p ~ nal plat
of Lot 1, Block 1, Castle Winds Addition.
The Chairman stated he had several re nests
q
. to
speak regards ng the s f1 nal p] at, but he
,
sa ~ d unless this was a repl at i n Si ngl e
Family zoning, they do not have a Public
~. Hearing. Chairman Tucker said there is a
zoning request on this property later on
this agenda which everyone will have a
chance to speak. He stated the only way
the Commission could deny a plat i s i f i t
does not meet the Subdivision Ordinance.
The Chairman asked if there were any
comments from the Commission members.
There were none.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 82-65.
Owen D. Long, Consulting Engineer, came
forward. He said they had received the City
Engineer's comments and have submitted a
rebuttal letter. Mr. Long said they feel
they can comply with the Engineer's requests.
Mr. Tucker asked if the plat could be used
for Local Retail zoning.
Mr. Long said it could. He said the platting
of this property has nothing to do with the
zoning.
4~ y
~~
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
December 21, 1982
~. i
~,
..,
PS 82-65 ~~
APPROVED
Mr. Nannon asked about the drainage
ditch.
Mr. Long said they would maintain i t
since i t would be privately owned.
Mr. Bronstad said let them maintain it.
Ms . Nash said she would 1 i ke to amend her
previous motion to include "approval
subject to the Engineer's co~nents".
This motion was seconded by~Mr. Nannon
and the motion carried 5-0.
4.
5.
6.
PS 82-66
PS 82-66
APPROVED
PS 82-61
PS 82-61
APPROVED
PZ 82-32
Request of BWBM Partnership for preliminar
plat of Lot 1, B1 ock 2, Castle Winds Ad
Qwen D. Long, Consulting Engineer,, `me
forward . He said they had recei ~~ the
City Engineer's comments and h ~e subrni tted
a rebuttl a letter. Mr. Lon. ~~ aid they can
comply with the City Engi~~er's comments.'
Mr. Bowen made them ~ on to approve PS 82-66
subject to the En ' eer's cor~nents.
This motion w seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion. cried 5-0.
Reque of Cross Roads Development Company
for reliminary plat of Block 8-R, Snow
ghts North Addition.
John Cook, General Partner of Cross Roads
Development Company, came forward. He
said they had received the City Engineer's
comments and take no exception to them.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 82-67
subject to the City Engineer's comments.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and
the motion carried 5-O.
Request of Tierra Financial, Inc. to rezone
Tract 3A, Abstract 321, William Cox Survey,
from its present classification of Agriculture
to a proposed classification of Multi-Family.
This property is located at the Northwest
corner of Turner Drive and Davis Blvd.
,.
wen D. bong, P. E.
CONSULTING ENGINEER
December 15, 1982
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1
Castle Winds Addition PS 82-65
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
We are in receipt of Mr. Richard Albin's ]etter of December 13,
1982 in regard to the above project and have the followin comments:
9
Item No. 1. After discussion with Mr. Bronstad, we will revise
the plans to show an 8" water line from Rufe Snow
Drive to the west property 1 i ne along the northern
boundary and also along the southern boundary -
with all others remaining 6" water lines.
Item No. 2. Sufficient fire hydrant coverage has been rovided
p
w~th~he location of the proposed fire hydrants based
on the 300 foot radius criteria and the 300 foot
radius will be added to the plans to show this
coverage.
Item No. 3. After a discussion with Mr. Bronstad, the sanitary
sewer system is to be privately owned; if not, ease-
ments and plan profile sheets will be submitted for
approval. The privately owned system is to be designed
as a part of the apartment plans.
Item No. 4. A note that a 10" stub-out is to be provided will be
added to the plans.
Item No. 5. Pro-rata comment is a part of the record.
If you have any further questions or requests regarding this ro'ect
P J
please give me a call. Your assistance is appreciated.
rely,
0 n ong,`P. E ~ ~
Consulting Enginee
ODL/m1
cc: Mr. Daryl ~.. Barrett
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / P. 0. Box 777, Hurst, Texas 76053 /Phone 817 281-8121 (Res. 2
' ~.
~v
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
December 13, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hi 11 s, Texas 16118
Re: 3-964, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
CASTLE WINDS ADDN., LOT 1, BLOCK 1
PS 82-65 FIN L PLANS, GRID 138 & 147
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. We would recommend that the following proposed 6-inch water lines
be changed to 8-inch lines as required to serve this development:
Section 1-3
Section 4-5~
Section 8-12
The other sections should remain at least 6-inch diameter.
2. It does not appear that sufficient fire hydrant protection coverage
has been provided based on the 300 foot radius criteria. Additional
fire hydrants may be required to provide cove rage of the entire
platted area.
3. Although the proposed sanitary sewer system which wil 1 serve this
development i s to be privately owned and maintained, we would request
that manhole fl owl i ne elevations and pipe grades be shown on the sewer
plan for future reference.
4. A 10-inch stub-out and plug should be provided south from the proposed
sewer manhole on the south 1 ine of the plat for a future parallel
1 i ne to provide relief for the existing 8-inch i n Rufe Snow.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 ~ 817/283-6211 • METRO/267.3367
,,
r. , ~ ,
1-
~~ ~
r~
Page 2, Planning & Zoning Commission, December 13, 1982
5, We would refer you to our comment number 4 in our letter dated
October 14, 1982, regarding water and sewer pro rata,
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdi vi son
please do not hes 1 Late to cal 1.
f
RICHARD W, ALBIN, P, E,
RWA/1 j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
~,
.•
r
~.
Mr. Bill Ernst
6612 Tabor Dr.
Fort Worth, Texas ?6118
Dear Mr. Ernst:
Gc~Q~G Gt ~.~,~'? F ~
~ ~~
~~ l~
December 8 1982
Again we are contacting you as the representative of the
property owners along the northern boundary of our property,
It is our hope that this letter is passed on to the other
interested parties,
We appreciated the opportunity to meet with four of the
property owners several weeks ago and your subsequent response
with a proposal for the development of a road along our northern
boundary, As we understand it, the proposal required that we
dedicated a 25-foot road or right of way plus additional land
to allow the new road to intersect Rufe Snow Drive and Mike
Street. We would be required to pay for one half the road
construction costs for the full length of the road and for both
sides of approximately 160 feet of length at the intersection of
Rufe Snow. This was necessary becuase Mr. Daly (owner of the
eastern most property) was'not interested in participating in the
development of a road. In return for those expenditures those
property owners would not contest further, the develo ment of
p
our complex. .
The,Partnersh~ip has studied the proposal and must reject it as
a viable option. The development of the road would also re uire
a twenty-five foot front and s q
y et back under M-F zoning. We
would not be allowed to build or even have parking in this
front yard space. Along with the twenty-five feet R,O.W, for
the road, that would result in a loss of a f if ty-foot wide stri
of usable land for the full len t p
g h of our land plus more at the
northwest corner. (net loss = more than 45,000 sq, ft.)
Obviously that loss along with the additional cost of a road
would cause us to reduce our number of units and render our
development unfeasible. In return we would gain minimal benefits
from the road, if any, and a promise from the adjacent ro ert
owners to "not contest" p p y
Obviously we were hoping for a more
cooperative effort.
We are still sympathetic with your desire to develop our
pro ert Our offer t y
P Y o donate eleven feet of width to the
adjacent property owners (allowing them the depth necessar
to develop their road and ro y
p perty in their own time) is
still open. We urge you all to reconsider that offer as it
will allow you the ability to develop your property as du lexes
and not be "land locked". ~
~ ~
,..
' ~;
~, .
We believe it is in the City's and projects best interest to
develop our own property and circulation internally. We see
many costly delays and problems before such a road could be
developed with so many property owners involved. Mr. Daly's
position will make it especially difficult. If we can be
of further service,-please feel free to contact us.
cerely,
Dar R. Barrett
BW Partnership
DRB/yp
u
r
t
., ~ ~
,.:..
• ~ November 3, 1982
Mr. Bill Ernst
=6612 Tabor Dr .
Fort~Worth, Texas 76118
Dear hsr . Ernst :
In~ conversation with City st of f and board members w w • •
to contact ou as s oke ~ e ere ada~~sed
Y p swan for the property owners to the north
of our proposed development, Castlewinds.
Subsequent to the Planning and Zoning Commission meetin o
21 we understand th ~ g n October
e desire of. the property owner to develo their
property. However iven the dif ~ p
g f iculity in financing these days
we cannot afford, nor ~ do we feel it is fair , to be burdened wit
additional cost or del h
ay toward our own development. After stud in
the proposed development, the followin dec y g
g isions were made:
1. A road along our north boundar will se
y rye us no purpose
as traffic from our complex will still have to o east t
Rufe Snow Dr, g
2.. The driveway shown on our plat serves two aisles of
parking and will be required regardless of a road to th
north, The City would not normal e
r ly allow even ane aisle
of head•in parking off a public street.
3. The mentioned 25-foot R,O.w. would eliminate a '
sid p rking and
e yard required by the City of North Richland Hills
and therefore cause us to reduce the number of units
possible thus jeopardizing the financial viabilit of t
ro'ect, Y he
p ~
However, we are sympathetic with your roblems and
re ared t p, therefore are
p p o make the following offer which will allow them to
develop their property, Subject~to the a royal •
the re ui pp of a variance reducing
q red number of parking spaces, we will deed to the ad'
property owners a width of ~acent
eleven feet of our property for the entire
length of our northern boundary. This additional la
nd will alloy
the property owners the depth necessar for the re ui
ri ht--of -wa Y Q red 50 foot
g y for a public street and still have the 110 foot de t
necessary to develo a lot un p h
p der 1-F-9 zoning, We will also commit
to giving right-of-way in the northeast corner of our
the road is constructed so property when
that the road can align with ~~~lke Street.
We are not interested in participating in the construct'
road which will serve no u ion of a
p rpose toward the development of our own
property. Additionally, we do not believe that this offer sh
be taken lightl The ro ould
Y p perty which we are discussing is being
bought at considerable cost to the Partnershi and we w' •
over 8800 s uare f p 111 be deeding
q eet to our neighbors.
I T .
t~
,~ ~ ~
C ~~
1
We will need a written response on this ro osal b •
order to ad'u ~ p, p y November 14 in
~ st our plans for final platting, The res onse wi
have to be positive b 100 o P 11
Y °~ f the property owners as to their
intention to develop a road and therefore desire t
he addlt tonal
property. We•would also be happy to meet with the ro er
both to discuss this offe P p. tY owners
r and to advise them in the costs roblems
and steps necessary to do their ro osed p '
p p development. Again it
. would seem 100 participation be required to reach an
. y agreement,
We feel this is the best method possible in our •
ablllty to assist
our neighbors in their problem. We cannot afford tim •
we foresee will be a delay which
required in the coordination of their dev
and it seems doubtful the 10 elopment
OHO participation will ever be achiev
However., if the commitment is th ed.
ere and there is a way we can help
without cost in time or expense then we will be
happy to do so.
If a meeting is desirable, please contact me
~or home 927-875 at mY office (267-3596}
C 2).
S ir~rely
Daryl Barrett
BWBA4 rtnership
4216 outh Drive
Fort Worth, Texas 76109
DRB/yp
cc; ~Geor e Tucker Chairma
g n
Planning and Zoning Commission
Gene Riddle, Director of~Public Works
Wanda Calvert, Zoning Coordinator
/j
~,~
DATE: January 6, 1983 .
,.
. .
.
~. SUBJECT: PZ 82-28 Zonin r est from Local Retail to Commercial-S ecifi'c Use-Auto Laundr
_ ,~
on Lot 4R, ~B1 ock 1, North Edgl ey Addition
DEPA•'tTMENT: Pl a nn i n and Zonin
BACKGROUND:. This ro ert ~ ~ is located on~~ Edison Drive and is bounded on the East b ~~ ~~
:,
RB Furniture and' International -House of ~~Pa'ncakes.
,~~ . _
. .: , - _
R.
... .. .
_ .. .. .
...~__:l Mr. Gra & Mr. Cam bell want to ut in a full service car wash with as um s.
• ~~
There were 9 ro ert owners contacted, but there was no one .present in ~opposi,tion,
.~
. ..
. ..
:~,-
` ~ The Piannin and Zonin Commission recomr~ended approval .of this zoning request.
CITY COU~ICIL ACTION ~tEQUIRED: Ap„p,~OVaI, or denial of zoning ~re~uest. ~ _ __
z~l ~ ~GETED I i ~'I : x r;S NO X
~c~~aUNT Nu~~ER: N A _ .
a~a.
.w r.rw.~r.rww.-wr.~r~r.~w.~.~..~r.~wrr www rw..~w~rw~+wwwwwwwww~rwwwwwwwwwwrwwww.-wrwwwwwwwwwwwwrw~ww~rw~rw~-rwA
,,~
November 18, 1982
P & Z Minutes .
r
Page Six
9. PZ 82-25 Request of Jim and Teresa Tr rezone Lot
WITHDRAWN 1, Block D, Richl ddition, from its
present c cation of 1F-12-One Family
g to a proposed classification of
Neighborhood Retail. This property is located
at 4801 Strummer Drive.
This case was withdrawn.
10. PZ 82-28 Request of John L. Gray and Tom Campbell to
rezone Lot 4R, Block 1, North Edgley Addition,
from its present classification of Local Retail
to a proposed classification of ConIDnercial-
Specific Use - Auto Laundry. This property is
located on Edison Drive and is bounded on the
east by RB Furniture and International House
of Pancakes.
John Gray came forward. He said they plan a
full service car wash with gas pumps. He said
they will sell Texaco gas.
Mr. Gray showed the Commission a site plan of
the project and pictures of one in Irving. He
said this one would be like that one.
Mr. Hannon aasked'the cost of constructing this
• building.
Mr. Gray said approximately $350,000, not in-
cluding equipment.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor of
this request to please come forward.
Stan Itzkowitz, Broker, came forward. He said
he was a representative for RB Furniture and
International House of Pancakes and Mr. Forbes.
Mr. Itzkowitz said the one in Irving is directly
across from a mall and this would be about the
same. He said the closest point to a residence
would be 77.39 feet and he did not feel this
would present a problem.
The Chairman called for those wishing to speak
• ~ in opposition to this request to please come
forward.
`. ~
i
~~
^
i~~.
November 18,1982
P & Z Minutes
Fage Seven
There being no .one wishing to speak, the
Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Tucker asked what the hours of operation
would be.
I ~~
Mr. Gray said 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. '
PZ 82-28 Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 82-28
APPROVED as requested. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
11. PZ 82-29 Request of Guy L. Cummins, Jr., Trustee, to
rezone Tract 3A2, Abstract 1010, William nn
Survey, from its present classificatio of '
Agriculture to a proposed classific on of
Local Retail. This property is 1 ated at the
northeast corner of Rufe Snow D ve and Chapman
• Road.
Delbert Stembridge, Con ting Engineer, came
forward to represent th the owner and the
purchaser of this perty. He said they have
a sale pending s 'ect to getting the zoning.
Mr. Stembridge aid they did not want to spend
a lot of mo , not knowing if they could get
the zonin
Mr, embridge said since the developers were
no Single Family developers, he suggested they
k for Local Retail zoning and then if they
wanted to downgrade later, they could come
back for another zoning change.
Mr. Tucker said the Commission is in the process
of writing a new zoning ordinance, which is in
the second drafting. He said they hope by
March, or earlier, they will have the final
approval by the City Council. Mr. Tucker said
this new zoning ordinance departs somewhat from
the old ordinance. He said Mr. Stembridge's
clients might not want to pick a zoning now.
Mr. Tucker said he felt it only fair to let
you know about this.
Mr. Stembridge said that was fine, but they can
not sell without having some kind of zoning.
He said they plan to have strip shopping centers
and garden-type office buildings.
,.,
~ r
. ~ \
'~
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
November 2, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 82 28
L.R. TO COM. SU AUTO LAUNDRY
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find tha t
we could adequately locate this property ~on the zoning map should it
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
r
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ 1 j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 617/283-6211 • METRO/267.3367
. ~ ~` l'
ORDI NANCE NO. ~-~~ ~
1
AN oRDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ,ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, .
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE ~ X119, ZONING ORDINANCE ~~
~~ ~ OF TifiE CITY OF NORTH RhCHLAHD NTLLS, TEXAS,
~~ PASSED, APPROVED, AHD ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMTSSION~AHD THE CITY COUNCIL OF .
THE CITY OF NORTi# RICNLAND NTLLS, NOVEMBER 13, .
1961, AS~ AMENDED JANUARY 21 ~ I915 , .
AFTER APPROPRIATENOTICE AHD PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING. RECON~EHDATION TS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNChL OF THE CITY OF NORT~i RTC~ILAND ~filtl~ ~Y THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
. PZ . 82-28 ~ ~ tie f of l o~~n descri~~ed ro arty sha1~1
RESOLVED that on Case Ho . 9 P P
be retonedfrom LocalRetai.l ~• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~tv
. - _ to la und.r~ .~ ~ . ..... ..... .... , ....... ...... ..
orth Ed le Addition to the City of North Richland
Bung Lot 4R, Block 1, N g y
Hi l 1 s, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded i n Deed Records, Tarrant County,
Texas, Volume 388-137, Page 5. .
' n Edison Drive and is bounded on the East by
Thy s property 1 s l ocated o
RB Furniture and International House of Pancakes.
ING COMMISSION THIS 18th DAY OF NOUEMBER,~1982.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING .AND ZON ..~._._
CHAIRMAN, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICNLAND HILLS ACTING
IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE~NO. PZ 82-28 IS
HEREBY REZONED COMMERCIAL-SPECIFIC USE-AUTO LAUNDRY THIS DAY OF
,1982.
MAYOR DICK FARAM
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
CITY ATTORNEY REX Mc ENTIRE
~f' .t~
~1
~~
~,~,,
y. DATE: January 6, 1983 .
. ~ ..
•~
~: ~~
' om .Local Retail to Loca] Retail-Specific Use-Sale of
UBJECT: PZ 82-30 Zoning request fr .
. ..
,.
~~ ~ ~ Alcoho] is Beverages on Lot 4, B1 ock 1, Carder Addition -
DEPARTMENT: Pl a nn i~ • a nd Zonin .
~.. ~ ~~.
_ _ ;,..
' ~ V ated' at the Southeast corner of Airport Freeway and
BACKGROUND. This ro ert ~s loc
.. ,
,.. .
~_ t Tra i 1 the old Bonanza restaurants . -~ ~~-~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
. ~ .. ~. ..
. - .J'
• ~ •
• ~ ~ ~ il~d~.a new Luthers' restaurant and serve beer and wine.
. North Texas Di n~ n ,Inc. wants to bu
• .~~ ~ ~i fic~-~s~e -,would be Pe ~er G Mc.Gui re" . .
~: z~~..The 'sa ~ d -'the name for the~~ S ec S ~ . ;
..
were 6 ro ert ~ owners contacted,: but no~ opposition., ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ •
There
.., _ .
., . ., _
.. . ,,
The Pl anni n and' Zonin .Commission recommended .approval of this zoning .request.
. .. .
.. .. ....
.~
• -.
., •
. .
. - ~ ~~
......
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. .
uI~DGETED ITEM: 'fir".S NO X
ACCOUNT I~Ut~ER:
.~.-~~.-~~~~~~~~~~.~~.~~~.r~~~w~~~~~~.~~~r.~~~r~~~~~~rr~~r~.~rr~~~~r ~ w~ ~r~~~r r~r~N~~~N~~~~~~~
N
l
i~.
..
November 18, 1982 .
P & Z Minute s
Page Nine
l~w~yY~ ~D~+lT~itl~~ y-R.W a.PV~~MiigKti~~.~~. i~~C .~a•~`~~'
. Mr. Tucker said 33 acres is a large amount r
Local Retail zoning so the Conunission f s
they are asking the Commission to sp ate.
He said if the developer plans to it it up,
they would do better if they r ested a Planned
Development zoning.
Mr. Stembridge asked Commission to look at
it from the purcha 's viewpoint, would they.
. want to spend a that money not knowing if
they could g the zoning.
Ms. Na asked what was the rush.
. Stembridge said they have a contract pending
the zoning.
~~
Councilman Richard Davis came forward. He
said there was a statement made in error. He
said with the present zoning ordinance, you
would not have to come in to down zone.
X82-29 Mr. Bowen made the motion to deny PZ 82-29.
ENIED This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the
motion to deny carried 4-1 with Mr. Wood voting
against denial.
The Chairman stated they have the right to
appeal to the City Council.
12. PZ 82-30 Request of North Texas Dining, Incorporated to
rezone Tract 3BSF, Abstract 308, E. S. Carder
. Survey, from its present classification of Local
Retail to a proposed classification of Local
Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.
This property is located at the southeast corner
of Airport Freeway and Blackfoot Trail the
old Bonanza Restaurant} .
Tommy Masterson, with North Texas Dining, came
forward. He said they are requesting this
zoning to allow them to serve beer and wine
with their food.
Mr. Wood asked what type of restaurant this
would be.
Mr. Masterson said it would be a Luthers
Restaurant which serves barbecue and ham-
burgers.
~(
~- •
I . ..
_''
November 18, 1982
P & Z Minutes
Page Ten
• Mr. Tucker said they would need a name for the
' Specific Use to ,be in.
Mr. Masterson gave Ms. Calvert the name of
"Peter G. McGuire."
The Chairman opened the public hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor of
- this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, the Chair-
. man called for those wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please come
forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, the Chair-
' man closed the public hearing.
PZ 82-30 Ms..Nash made the motion to approve PZ 82-30
APPROVED as requested. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
i '•
13. PS 82-60 _. Request.of North Texas Dining, Incorporated
Short Form Platting of Lot 4, Block 1, C er .
_ Addition.
__ Delbert Stembridge came forwar o represent
North Texas Dining in their equest. He stated
• they had purchased the Bonanza Restaurant
and plan to tear do he building and build
another one.
Mr. Stemb ge said they agree to the Engineer's
commen
PS 82-60 Wood made the motion to approve PS 82-60
APPROVED subject to the Engineer's comments. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the
motion carried 5-0.
14. PZ 82- Request of Joe Parton, Parton's Pizza, to re-
zone a portion of Lot 1, Block 6, Snow Heights
North Addition, from its present classification
of Local Retail to a proposed classification
of Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic
Beverages. This property is located on the
east side of Ruf a Snow Drive and is approxi-
mately 264 feet north of Lewis Drive.
t
~.
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
November 2, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
1301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW PZ 82-30
.R. T L.R. SU LC H LIC BEV.
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find tha t
_ we could adequately 1 ocate this property on the zoning map should i t
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
r
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ 1 jc
c c: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
n
~~
.;- 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG, • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267.3367
i•
i•
~ , SCALE : i~~ =100
~y. 6b.
~ ~,~`
~ ---
~P~ d~~ ~ '
`~ a° p1 ~ 1
2 ~
'0 0~ ~ 2
o ~
Z
i
~' 3~0 ~ LOT 4 G "" _"'
.~ . ~
b O. ~
0
~ y
a ~ 3
~ p'~
rs~.3s'
~ O~ S89~0'E
O Q,
Q
m I
LOT 4 , BLOCK 1
CARDER ADDITION
1
BEING a tr~~c ~ c.~1. la~
the City ~f North
particularly des
r
HEGjNN1NC~ a t ~~
said iron P1-
,~ ~9 degrees
'~ .dor th 89 ~'
East 228
THENCE
orn
T'
R
CITY OF HORTN RICNt.AHD NILLS
aPPROYED aS t0 FORM AHD LEGALITY
TY TTORHEY .
CITY OF HORTN RICHi.AHD NII.l.S
i .~
r~
- - D~~g; January 6, 1983 '~~~
- `~. •~
•.
..
. ..
.;
.,.
. _ ~ ' est from Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale: of
SUBJECT. PZ 82 31 Zon~n requ
,~
~.
~~~ ~ i B~evera es on a orti on of Lot 1, Block 6, Snow Hei hts~ North Addi tion.~
Alcohol c
. :~
. . , .. ..
' el 1 beer and wine with i zza . -•He said the_ Specific Use permit should .
Mr. Parton wishes to s p
a . ;. ,,~ •
. v,,,~r ,,, ,,,.. _ r .. .,t, ;~
- ~ ~ ~~.~ •~~.' .. ,'j ~ `,~iM S,~ tf'~ '. /~ ~• err fit. ` '~ ~ ~ .. -
- be ut i n h ~ s name, ~ ~.--P~a~t-~n ~ . 1~
here were 2~ ro ert owners contacted, but no opposition., - ' ~ -
T p P y
. -~ .. ~ .
-The P1 anni n and• Zoning Commission recommended. approval of this zoning .request.
9
. .; _.
,, .. .
• .
.• .
4
•
~ -
..r
CYTY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: A roval or denial of zonin ~re uest.
~~i'~GETED ITF~i: ~ `fr;S NO X
ACCOUNT I~UMB~R: ~ _ -
r..~...~.rr r_.w.~.r.~_~w.+.wr
v w~w~~~ ~~uirr~rrwww ~w~~w ww.~w ww..~ww w ww wM•rw ww~rww ~wrw.~~rww•r •r~w~w~w ~~~~M~r~~~r~~ ~~. w~r~1.~M~~rN~w~~w~M•
,.. November 18, 1982
P. & Z Minute s
Page Ten
. Mr. Tucker said they would need a name for e
Specific Use to ,be in.
Mr. Masterson gave Ms. Calvert the n of
"Peter G. McGuire."
The Chairman opened the public Baring and
called for those wishing to Bak in favoz of
- this request to please co forward.
There being no one w' ing to speak, the Chair-
man called for tho wishing to speak in
opposition to th' request to please come
forward.
There bei no one wishing to speak, the Chair-
' man clo the public hearing.
PZ 82-30 Ms. ash made the nation to approve PZ 82-30
APPROVED requested. This motion was seconded by
Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
13. PS 82-60 Request of North Texas Dining, Incorporated for
~.,
..
Short Form Platting of Lot 4, Block 1, Car er
Addition.
Delbert Stembridge came forward to represent
North Texas Dining in their request. He stated
they had purchased the old Bonanza Restaurant
and plan to tear down the building and build
another one.
,. Mr. Stembridge said they agree to the Engineer's
comments.
PS 82-60 Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 82-60
APPROVED subject to the Engineer's comments. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the
motion carried 5-0.
14. PZ 82-31 Request of Jae Parton, Parton's Pizza, to re-
zone a portion of Lot 1, Block 6, Snow Heights
North Addition, from its present classification
of Local Retail to a proposed classification
of Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic
Beverages. This property is located on the
east side of Rufe Snow Drive and is approxi-
mately 264 feet north of Lewis Drive.
~ •
i
r
November 18, 1982
P & Z Minutes
Page Eleven
Burk Collins, owner of the property, came
forward. He said they wish to sell beer and
wine with their pizza. Mr. Collins said he
was a developer of Ruf a Snow development and
Joe Parton runs a very clean operation.
Mr. Collins said the Specific Use permit should
be i.n the name of "Joe Parton." He said
Mr. Parton was present if the Commission needed
to ask him any questions.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor
of this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, the Chair-
man called for those wishing to speak in opposi-
tion to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, the Chair -
man closed the public hearing.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 82-31
as requested. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
PZ 82-31
APPROVED
The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
i ~.
;r
3
"
~ , ~, , 1- ,
/ ~-~
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Callas
November 10, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hill s
1301 N. E, Loop 820
North Richland Hi 11 s, Texas 76118
Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT R_EYIEW, PZ 82-31,
LRTOLRSALE~OFALHCOL.~BEV.
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that
we could adequately 1 ocate this property on the zoning map should i t be
passed by both the P1 anni ng & Zoni ng Commission and the City Counci 1.
r
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P, E.
RWA/1 j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267-3367
pZ ~a-.3i
SCA E : ~+- ~~
11
i •~
5~9°3~~ 5~.5s~
et
0 ~L ~K 5
t.
b
W
~ ~a~
Q W m
b
~ ti
~ ~
`l ~3 ).
~~ ~~
~~
M ~~
L E/N/ S DI?/YE
B~ I~du a ~ar~~. ~c~r~ of ~L~C~ 6,
I C~'L~i~lQ f~ I i_L; , T~~R~~dT C1~
3~~-l~~i, ~}a~~o ?9, of R hF
oarti::~~~ Orly de~crit~~~~`
~E~I~~~I~~~:a at ~ i~~ain~
~auth ~~ de~~3~e#as
-r~N~~~dC~ "~~ur~h D ~-
f~~ ~
~~. ~~ ~~.
Ti~EP~~CE 5~,,
cc~nt~ ~
208 ~ Sc~. FT.
.,
M,
~N
M
V
N
0
b
,U 89'3 ~'~_ ,3.55
~E~~C'~,IE'i~I~;N '~f~ P{~'~Pf liY ~11~'J~YE~
I•
~ • 4
S
1
CITY OF NORTH RICNLAND NILLS .
' APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
TTORREY .
CITY OF NORTN RICNLAND NILLS
t~ '
.,
~~
DATE:_ Ja nuary .6 , 1983 .
..
• ~ ~ ~
'. .
..SUBJECT: PZ 82-34 Zonin Re uest from A riculture to 1F-9-One'Famil Dwellin s
. .. ,.
f.
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zonin
There were 16 property _ ..
owners contacted. One spoke ~ but
said ~he
had no oppo~i tion to it.
._
. -.. ~
~ .
.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning. request.
CYTY COUt1CIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. •
c~i~LGETED ITEM: ~ '~F.S NO X
ACCOUNT AUZ~ER: NIA
___.___.
.~.~~r.r~~~~~.~~~~+~~r~ir~~~~r~~~~~.~~~~~~r.~.r~r~~~~r~r~~r~r.r~r~~~~~~r~r~rw~.--rte.- r ~~~~~r~~r~~~~w~r~~~~~~
C~
1
`~ •
(
Page 1 ~ ~
P & Z Mi nutes ~` `~
December 21, 1982
_. PZ 82-32 Mr. Bowen made the motion to deny PZ
-' DENIED This motion was seconded by Ms. and
the motion~to deny carried with Mr.
,, Hannon voting against al.
7. PZ 82-34 Request of A - evelopment Company to
POSTPONED rezone tion of Tract 6, Abstract
95 ala Lynch Survey, from its present
assi~fication of 1F-12-one Family
Dwellings to a proposed classification of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings.
This property i s 1 ocated 117 feet East
of Tourist Drive and approximately 150 ~ .
feet South of 6ew1 ey Street.
. The Chairman stated this request has been
postponed until January 21, 1983.
8. PZ 82-34 Request of Danny D. Jeffries to rezone
Tracts 1B & 1B1, abstract 14~, William
D. Barnes Survey, from their present
classification of Agriculture to a
proposed classification of 1F-9-one
. Family Dwellings.
This property is located on the East side
of Smithfield Road at the intersection of
~ ~ Ever reen Avenue and Smithfield Road.
9
Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer, came
forward to represent Mr. Jeffries. He
stated they feel that 1F-9 zoning would
conform to the area since Ki ngswood Estates
to the West and Crestwood Estates to the
Southeast were both 1F-9 zoning.
Mr. Hedgcoth said Mr. Jeffries plans to
construct a cul de sac of 11 lots. He
said the 4.9 acres would provide to the
local builders the development of Single
Family homes.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in
favor of this request to please come forward.
Glynn Blair, 1109 Evergreen Avenue, came
forward. He asked if 1F-9 zoning would
allow rental property or would it be
privately owned.
Mr. Tucker said it would be for single
family homes.
,~
~~
..
~` ~
Page 8 ~~^
P & Z Mi nutes
December 21, 1982
,~ ~~ Mr. B1 ai r said he had no objection to
this zoning request.
The Chairman called for those wishing to
~,
speak in opposition to this request to
please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,~'the
Chairman c]osed the Public Hearing.
PZ 82-34 Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 82-34
APPROVED as .requested.
This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion carried 5-0.
~. PS 82-63 Request of Danny D. Jeffries for relimin
p
plat of Lots 1-17, Block 9, Crestwood ates.
Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engin. ,came
forward . He said they had rec ' ed the
City Engineer's comments an eel they can
comply with them.
Mr. Bowen asked i f ; was aware of the
e~ • % ~ •
letter from Publi~ ork s D~rector,~Gene
t~
f,,.
R~ ddl e.
Mr. Hedgc said he was and in the final
plat t ~" would probably have only 16 lots,
He s ~ d the Subdivision Ordinance does not
s. ` e what to do on a cul de sac , Mr.
~.edgcoth said he talked to the City Engineer
and he said he required a 10 ft. front at
the building 1 i ne. He said on 1 ots 7, 8,
9 and 10, he would show a width of 55 feet
instead of ~0 feet, and then they would be
in conformance with the l0 feet at the
building line. Mr. Hedgcoth said when they
submit the final plat, all lots will have
the required 9,500 square feet.
~'S 82-63 Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 82-63
APPROVED subject to the Engineer's corunents and
subject to the letter from Mr. Riddle.
This motion was seconded by Ms. Nast, and the
motion carried 5-0.
3
t
~ r
-
,.~
~ . ~~ ~,
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
December 13, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hi 11 s
1301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 16118
Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW PS 82-34,
AG. TO I F-9 GRID 51
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find
that we could adequately 1 ocate this property on the zoning map
should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Cammission and
the City Council,
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ 1 j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283.6211 • METRO/267-3367
l
'!
ORDINANCE N4.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN .ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS,.
SECTTON 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE
~~ ~ OF THE CITY OF HQRTN RTCNLAND NILLS, TEXAS,
PASSEQ, APPROVED AN4 ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSTOH~ANO THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RTCNLAND NILLS, NOVEMBER I3,
1967 , AS~ AMENDED JANUARY 21 ~ 1915 . ,
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING. RECOMMENDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCT~L OP THE CITY' 0~' NORTH RTCNLAND MILLS 6Y THE
PLANNING AND ZONING CON~(ISSION: ~ ~ ~ ~.
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 82-34 the following descr~~ed property sha1~1.
be rez6ned from gr~cu ure ~"" ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ to
1F-9-One~amily Dwellings. ~ __
r f 1 and out of the Ali 11 i am D . Barnes Survey, Abstract
BEINa a tract or parcel .o
146 Tarrant County, Texas, and more particularly that certain 4.92 acre
tract of )and recorded in Volume 5411, Page 376, Deed Records of Tarrant
Count Texas, and being more particularly described by. metes and bounds as
Y~
follows:
BEG INNING at an iron i n at the Northeast corner of a tract of 1 and conveyed
•p Deed
to Lakeland St. Baptist Church and recorded zn Volume 4887, Page 514,
Records of Tarrant County, Texas, ,said point being by deed call 653 varas
West, and 355 varas North, of the Southeast corner of said Barnes Survey,
said oint being also the Southeast corner of said 4.92 acre tract;
P
THENCE West, 663.8 feet to an iron pin in the east line. of County Road No.
3076 Smithfield Road};
THENCE North 06 de reel 43 minutes East along the east line of said road 336.1
9
feet to an iron pin for corner; .
d rees 57 minutes East 619.2 feet to a pipe at the northeast
THENCE North 89 eg
corner of said 4.92 acre tract;
THENCE South 0 de rees 49 minutes East 334.4 feet to the point of beginning
9
and containing 4.92 acres of land.
DATE: January 6, 1983 - ~~'`
~ ~ ~ -
t '' - ~ •. ,
., .
SUBJECT: PZ 82-35 Zonin re ue~st from Loca] Retail to om er i 1
,~
.. .
Richland Hei hts Addition. ~ '
~, DEPAR~'MENT: Pl anni n and Zon i n ~ :~
. .~
..
~~~~ ~ ~ BACKGROUND: Thi s ~ ~ro ert i s ~ l ocated on ~ the east side of Booth Cal lo~va ~ Road and i s
~~~'~~,.~a~pproximately 192 feet~nor~th of the intersectian~ of Booth CallowaRoad and G]enview Drive:
:.,.
~:. .. .. .
,:.
..
~..
..,~ h1r. Lundgren wishes to have a B & L Rental there, but with Local Retain zoni n the could
t .. _ .
.,4`r not have any .outside= stora e ~ . ~~ , -~~~~ ~ ~ . , • . ~ _...~ ; : ~ . ; .._
1 rr •x , ~ 't.
t . •~ ~ ~
~ ~
• , ~ ~ ~
. . .
... There were 6~ property ~ owners oontact,~d, but no opposition.. ~ ~~
.S ..,
_.
The P1 anni ng and Zoning Commission recor~mended approval of this zoning .request.
..
.~
. ~ ~ .
......
CITY COUr~CIL ACTION REQUIRED: A royal or denial of zonin re nest.
~~I~~CET~D ITEM: ~~ ir~S NO X
ACCOUNT NtJt~ER: N/A
~.r~r~~~~~.I~.~r~~~~~...~~~~~~r~w~~~~~~.~~~i~~~~~~~~rrr~~~r ~~~~.ry~~~~rYri1~1-~Nr~N ~~N~~~.~~ N.~~rrr~
r1
LJ
,~
I~ •
Page 9
P & Z Mi nutes '~ ~ ~~
December 21, 1982
10. ~ PZ 82-35 Request of Ray McElroy to rezone Lot A,
Block 9, Richland Heights Addition, from
its present classification of Local Retai 1
to a proposed classification of Commercial.
'' This property i s located on the East side
of Booth Calloway Road and is approximately
192 feet North of the intersection of
Booth Calloway Road and Glenview Drive.
Jerry Lundgren, .Jr: with B & L Rentals came
forward.. Ne said this was a family owned
rental yard. Mr. Lundgren said they were
requesting this zoning change because you
can not have outside storage in Local Retail
zoning.
Mr. Wood asked what kind of storage would
they have.
Mr. Lundgren said some pumps and hoses.
~~
- Mr. Wood asked of there was a fence on thi s
property.
Mr. Lundgren said there would be a stockade
fence on the side and a cyclone fence on
the back which backs up to the drainage
ditch.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor
of thi s~ request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, the
Chairman called for those wishing to speak
in opposition to this request to please
come forward .
There being no one wishing to speak, the
Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
PZ 82-35 Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve
APPROVED PZ 82-35 as requested.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and
the motion carried 5-0.
11. PZ 82-36 Request of Donald L. ezone Lot 6,
Edgl a rom its present cl assi fi -
1on of 1F-9-One Family Dwelling to a
proposed classification of Loca 1 Retail .
This property is located at 4154 Willman St.
r! ~ \'
~' A
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
December 13, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hi 11 s
1301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 16118
Re; 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW PS 82-35
L.R. TO COM. GRID 150
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find
that we could adequately 1 ocate this property on the zoning map
should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and
the City Council.
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/1 j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
C~
-._ 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267.3367
- s. ~~ ~e .'I' A t ~•7-}:w~. >~ ~ - aK • • •~i~~*7a }Y ~ yi~.~r4~^~~rM' ~ ,~1~t'..,~ ~a..~ y,~ ~.+.' '1r;~•
r;~! •~~~x ~ '~+ ,'-, A-i~~...^ 1 fir;#~~.+ ~• 4... ~!t~ t Y. ~.'~~ •~~'~ 4 ,~~~~~~ r , `" ' ~T
4 ~~. iii ay. •i ~. ~ • ~ .^ ~.. T' ti`j[ ~'~, •• `r y , ~ {• ,,r~.
I ,t. lar ~• :r~ [i' „ ;S-,~ r s, ~-`` -.1i.}r M '/.' t. •~" -1 •C+n lf'
'S•" ,~',~,~y. }. 1r'}' `p ~•, :. r. e. •.!' F ~ l ~ !L y ~1'~ !' 5. 1: r ~' ' r • .iA . ~.~~Y f , fi ,~I~, ~~ • !~.
'~ cs ,::1 ,~1{j " :t•,:lr'•~'t .~,; , y~M.~ y'~4; R't ,'~ ~?:dy'>~,T a .~..~! ~r~' (i~„+.!'~t ~'i * r wlt :'„ •;~''l`, 11r..~,4~ ;.i +1~'.
„~ y~~ ° i.. f * >~ Z~• f ' ~" ~~; .1i '1f4'.etr.11 •~ • ' t ~'ri ~ , ~~' !}1'• ~~r, `~,' ''r rr' ~ ~ '"~1 +~'t' 'a
1 ~~ :•'' !n a"~w +' •f•, `+: 'li ~ '~~a' r., t..! f `v G~~•.~ ~y ;!.•r 11+ ~ J~•~; ~ r•• ..~~t ~~rS.
~ a~' .~ 'j c ~ ~• ~7„'. ~ .f +. X ~f u ~ 't• "~j • ~ c~ -.~ ff p ', 1'•,; .~''r!t.r,, i '1
1F~• ~~: ~• i. '71 _.1.. `l •, rrt ,. 'i}:1•~ "•.~ ,C'~. ..) ~'f. ~~~f.~' ~,`i V- .1 `~~- ~:f~ ..f
~ fi.. *`'t • jY + y • ~ ~ ~~ '* i." '. .i ri rte? :1i,~, ~~
•!~ ~...rl;j' t'; ~ +~, rr.. ~"" ~~ :.a .. ~ ~,.~ .~~,.~ liY i~ 7 • ~ ' 4 + ":'ti 1•~ t t ~:4f•!V11*'.} .~ I{°1a~ lid ~1•; ~
~. , R' '~r w,t} •~"'~ [ a•fJl~ ~ ' "Iy :1 . f. r ` i t • •'~ ~ •,'~,' r : ~ fir, ~ t l 'l ~• ' ' ~. ~ _1 ~. ~{'.
,r- "~~•. .~:Y ~~.~yl. T'1 :I,7, ar i• t~~ 1~ I ~` :1~s'~ yt '.a~},~ ~~. .~A•~~'. d' .'w Y') ~ ~.T'~~r 4~f ~~1~f~f f
." ~ ~ ,r" R _ .,'1r t+± ~. ks~ ~} al r ti, •~~~~~'. 4Ftik-3~ t• ` ,jq'r r'r.r ~ '~~, ~ rel ! .rtti' ~ tl ~~
~' a .. ~'~ ~ ~. ~'! ~t~~•' ~ :~' 7~'~~ j %",M~• •t.. r~~.4, ~ ~~~•1a,D'' .~~'•~ ~A! I~~i~'~~•+V~~ Y'y~!~t~~,,r,t,`.',+t, •~+ ~ 4~ .~', ~,~,~~y+pi~.~ ~a
,,,,~~ ~ ~± ,r ,1 i, f~ i' _ ~.. ~ ~, ~, a'.ty?11 - ~1. ?~..{,~! r ^~'T ~ti,•~r •~1~ f J~o
r ~i V } ~ }i. •i~,i'~' f•.~~i. J"Q~~,}~ ~~''~+*'t ~•?~ « ~ ryrrr+'• a•71~~'~:`j; ~,~ .d',~'
't.~ ~. +,'~,,"rj ~ r~'dr .~7y,... ~ ,a..r~ .):~,;;,I~i! ';il~M•^ ti, 1~'~,`l'~•~E~ a . ~. r 'f 11`"~r.:fi~r ~~~.1i ~•.'S~* ~.'~
,r•f {7' 1•' ~' ~1~~7: M('.~ r~'"-."~•"~-L' rt``: 1 " •'~.+k'~4 ..~~~~~~~~ a~4 s,~ ,~f'•~ ~ ~'i ~A l~~ .ti}
w 4 i ~ R G .i•Y , ~.
fi r. • ~.
•r ~
~. t . ~. ~
.~.,
T ~ ~. ~~. ~
r
!'~ J
^~ C: r
+tir y.~+ _ 7 • w r
Si ~ ~,Yi f r x
~ i _ „ •'
f ~ 9r ~ ti - ~ ~y ~ ti•.
j a
-'C t iw ~ f ~~ ;~.
~'•. j Q {I '~ r ~ t t.
~ hy~~'., M`fr'"" k `~ ~.°,"'S .~t -.• ' ~', °• ~ • I
,j+ ! t _ fir
aw ,y 7 III +~ ,3; I ..
• • ~" r
3~~ . " t i + ~ ~.i,.w
.•. 7 7 • ]I. ~ t r
'~i rr ^ ' ~"~ M~• V a
4. ,f' ..,1:. 1 tip.
..: ~, . N ~ . ~ ,v. ~ i. .. ,
~1 x •~ ~ r,
;i `1 + ~r
~ .
ti f ax ~a,~" ~ ~
tt f ~ ~ i•r
.~ a'~ ~ a ~ ..,..
W
k; y 1. ~' • ,ate ~ ~~ „ s •
s~ a. ~' -f,~e
' £' r
r~~ 1
' ~, . ..~ '
jy~~ jj a ~ ~7' ~
.; y ~. p
~,+ ' ,~ '' .. t ~ '.~7 M
~ ` iF 7.
r •~ `+.~
r
,f~ ~ ~` ~-L /11 , i .fir ~ .. fM
~, jijf Y
~f s ~' ,.
•a
f l:
:~:~LrI•
• ~ , a...r w ~ r
• ,. ~ ~ ~ ' Y. •rt.rsr•..•.•. ...may.,.+."7 }.•11 • TM~a 1'rr~r ...'.M. IL ~MMtK.A'.•: .. •:..r.~~i ~i.~. t.~ •1/..+f.Aw . ~~Ar ~..•/. r.~I.~•. q. r~.STrr~~.I ~~~ .rAfrM~i
;lay ~ ~ ~
~., ~
a ~ f^L ~ ~ ~ ~ ' h' ~ ~ ~ ~ .~
r
~ ... p~ ,. .. ~.
,~
7
,.
., ..
r~ r~,,d.i« ~
'r i,~ a '.`rf 1~v ~ . ...."~
r -. r._ ~. ~ -I.2
. ~+.~ , `
11Sti ~'~• • i r r '
F 1
~ f
•
. N
w• Y
-y . ~ ~" .y4~
:•i ~ ^~' % J ~~:}~~~ ..~!' r, i~ ~ 4 .atr-. ./'~ ' yr' 1~
TT 1. ,~_._. _.. .rMR..... .•R~. ,.. ..r
s
ORDINANCE Na.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN .ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, .
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE X179, ZONING ORDINANCE
~~ ~ ~ 4F THE CITY OF NORTH RICHl.AND HILLS, TEXAS,
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AHD ZONING COMMISSIOH~ AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF .
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, .
1967, AS~ AMENDED JANUARY 21, 1915 ~ ~. .
AF PP RIATE~NOTICE ANO PUBLIC NEARING THE FOLIOWING.RECOMMENDATION IS
TER A ROP
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 4F NORTH RxC~iLAND HILLS ~Y THE
PLANNING AND ZONING CON~+IISSION: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 82-35 ~ ~ the fo11 o~i~ng descr~~~ed property sh~~ .
be rezoned from Local Reta~i 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ to
Corr~nnercia]. ~ ~ .... ,....... ................. .. ...
BEING Lot A, Block 9, Richland Heights Addition, to the City~of North
Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-15, Page
387, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas..
This property is located on the East side of Booth Calloway Road and is
approximately 192 feet North of the intersection of Booth Calloway Road
and Glenview Drive.
BY THE PLANNIP~G AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 21st DAY OF
,1982.
~~en ~ e
~ ~U~r
CHAIRMAN, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE N0.
PZ 82-35 IS HEREBY REZONED
THIS DAY OF ,1983.
M:4YOR DICK FARAM
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY, JEANETTE MOORS
APPROVED AS TO FORM APED LEGALITY
CITY ATTORNEY, REX McENTIRE
DATE: Januar 6 1983 ~~ '~
A
•. •
. • • ,
'•
. SUBJECT: PZ 82-37 Zoni n re uest from Local Retail to M 1 i -Fami l o Trac s 284 & 2B6
f ,.
f
i
:~ ~ Abs trac t 1588 J .M . vandusen Surve
D~EPA~RTMENT: P1 anni n4 ar~d Zoni n
BACKGROUND: This ro ert i s l orated ~ on the west s i de of Rufe Snow extend i n westward 1279.4
. .
,, .
•~ ~.
~~°~ feet with the back 479.4 feet extendi n south to ~G1enview Dri v~.
.. ~ ~ .
.. ~ ~ .
~; .
..
~~.~. Mr. Barrett with BWBM Partnershi wishes to bui 1 d a artments on this .ro ert . He a reed to
-.
,,
,:,
• • • • •i
~:::.~.: ~~ attachin his site lan to~ the zon~n . ~ •. .
. ~..
.. ~ .. .
. . .
--~:~~ There were 39 pro erty owners contaG,ted and there were .many who were i n oppose ti on.
.. ~ ,,
There was a peti ti on submitted with 19 of the 39 property owners on i t.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recomriended approval of this zoning request with a vote
~'
of 4-1 with Ms. Nash voting against.
.~..,_..
CYTY COUi~CIL ACTION REQUIRED: A royal or denial of zonin re uest
z~1~~P,GETED ITEM: ~ i.r;S NO X .
~c~ouN~r Nt~~ER: NlA
__f___
vr~....~.~.r...•.~~.~r~.~r~w..~~..•~~~~w~~~~r~ ~.~.~~.~.~.~~~~.~r•+~.~~.rw.~..~r.~~~~~r~r~~~r.~~.~~~r~~~~~w~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~
P .
}.
Page 10.
P & Z Minutes ~~ ~--
` December 21, 1982
e~
~PZ 82 - 36
WITHDRAWN
12. PZ 82-37
~.
~.
Mr. Swope came forward. He stated h
was re uestin this zonin ch o
q 9 9
Local Retai 1 fora tel a service. He
said right now he is house rented
' as a:~resid ut might someday like
to u or a telephone service.
Mr. Tucker said i f ~ i t was changed to
Local Retai 1, he could no longer rent
it as a residence.
Mr. Swope said he was not aware of this
and withdrew his request.
Request of BWBM Partners ~ p o rezone
Tracts 264 & 266, Abstract 1588, J. M:~
vandusen Survey, from their present
classification of Local Retail to a
proposed classification of Multi-Family.
Thi s~ property has ~ a 476; 60 ft. frontage
on the west side of Rufe Snow Drive at
the intersection of Mike Street and Manor
Avenue and extends westward 1219.4 ft.
and the back 479,4 ft. extends south a
distance of 1164 feet to G1 envi ew Drive.
Daryl Barrett came forward to represent
BWBM Partnership. He said he urged the
Corrnission to change the zoning of this
property to Multi-Family for the purpose
of construction apartments. Mr. Barrett
said when they first app] ied for the
zoning, they had the zoning they needed.
He said their application was sal ey to
develop what they considered a better
housing complex, better for the future
residents, better for the city and better
for the surrounding neighborhood. Mr.
Barrett said through posted signs, newspaper
articles, correspondence with the city and
their platting, its intended Bevel o~nent as
Multi-Family has been obvious since its
zoning change 13 years ago.
Mr. Barrett said now it appears a zoning
change is necessary to follow through on
the 8 months of effort and expense incurred
toward what they believe wi l ] be the finest
housing of its kind in Northeast Tarrant
County.
r
Page 11 ~
P~ & Z Mi nutes
December 21, 1982
~;~~~ Mr. Barrett said at the hearing for their
preliminary plat in Phase I, the Commission
urged him to be sensitive to the concerns
of the neighbors to the north and their
des i re~ to avoi d a 1 a nd 1 ocked situation on
the vacant parcel ~of 1 and, 150 feet deep.
He said he had made attempts; he~had made
them an offer; there was no response; then
he met with them and they requested he
build them a street. Mr. Barrett said he
could not do ~ that. However, he said they
would commit to dedicate right-of-way for
a road to intersect Mike Street for 160
feet west of Rufe Snow. Mr. Barrett said
they would a] so pay for that 160 feet of
street and utility construction providing
the city does not make them replace the
parking spaces they wi 7 ] 1 ose by that
dedication. He said this agreement would
have to 6e made prior to their start of
construction. Mr. Barrett said this agree-
ment would al 1 ow the property owners to
Bevel op~ their property wi th a 50 ft. ri ght-
of-way and a 100 ft. depth of 1 of necessary
far a duplex zoning. He said he would
~~ - ~ ~~ support their zoning change.
Mr. Barrett said ~rhen they first bought the
property, they had the flexibility to
bui 1 d apartments on al 1 41 acres, but after
discussion with the City Staff and the
-- Con~ni ssi on, they have reduced i t to approx-
imately 21 acres . He said their intentions
for the western tract is townhouses with
zero lot lines and their plan for the
corner tract is a neighborhood shopping
center anchored by a grocery store. Mr.
Barrett said they had positive conversations
with two major grocery chains, but their
comments were that they would need the
multi -family there to create the need for
a Grocery store. Mr. Barrett said the
development of the whole 47 acres is
dependent upon the Multi-Family housing.
Mr. Barrett said this 41 acres is too
large to develop as Local Retail and it is
not feasable for single family homes. He
said the logical use of this land is as
apartments and this development is necessary
to create a market for the other two tracts.
i "'-"
Page 12 ~
P & Z Minutes ~~ ~ .
D ec ember ~ 21, 1982
4
~._. ~~ Mr. Tucker asked i f thi s property were
~.' Single Family, what would a lot cost.
Mr. Barrett said approximately $80,400.
~ Ne said he paid $1.30 per square foot
plus interest for this property; then
add the water and sewer cost. He ~ said
the area south of G1 envi ew has been
targeted for redevelopment and ~ he feel s
this Multi -Family zoning would be a good
transition. He said they were going to
design and construct these units as
condomi nimums to be converted to such
when a vi abl e~ market i s here. Mr. Barrett
said they would have extra amenities such .
as fireplaces, washer/dryer connections,
cathedral cei 1 i ngs, large patio/balconies ,-
. semi -private courtyards and energy efficient
designs and green spaces.
Mr. Tucker asked what the pace would be to
rent these apartments. ~~ .
Mr. Barrett said the one bedroom. apartments
would rent for $315.00 and the two bedroom
apartments for $460.00 per month.
Mr. Tucker asked if he would agree to making
the site plan and construction pl ans a part
of this zoning.
Mr. Barrett said he is willin to tie the
9
. .
zone ng to exactly what 1 s shown ~ n h~ s s~ to
plan and construction plans.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor
of this request to p1 ease come forward .
There being no one wishing to speak, the
Chairman called for those wishing to speak
in opposition to please come forward.
~-
,~ .
Chairman Tucker said the petition that was
submitted would become a part of the minutes
of this meeting.
Bill Ernst, 6612 Tabor St., came forward.
He said the traffic on Rufe Snow is such
that Rufe Snow is not even usuable now,
morning or evening. Mr. Ernst said this
1
:~.,
.;
1
Page 13
P & t Minutes '~
i
December ~21, 1982
apartment cor~pl es would add 200 cars both
morning and evening on Rufe Snow. He
said i t would ruin the value of surrounding
~~ land, it would become a slum area with
transient residents, uncaring, with no
yards or gardens, and absentee landlords.
Mr. Ernst said this apartment complex would
create additional crime and drug problems,
He said. one of the City Council members
stated the last five drug busts were made
' i n apartment complexes. Mr. Ernst sai d
we do not need any rental property in
North Richland Hills. He said this would
be spot zoning since there i s Single Family
on a]1 four sides. Mr.. Ernst: said. apartments
do not pay their fair share. Ne said F1r.
Barrett said .he had spent eight months
working on this property, but these homeowners
have up to 35 years invested. Mr. Ernst said
' he was requesting the Commission turn down
this apartment complex.
•. Mr, Ernst said Mr. Garrett must have goner
to the wrong place to figure the price for
a lot there. He said you could buy any of
those houses and lots for $80,000.
Mr. Tucker asked what Mr. Ernst would like
to see there.
Mr. Ernst said he would like to see Si ngl e
Family homes. He said he feels it would be
the highest and best use of the hand.
Mr. Tucker asked i f he realized what coul d
~~ be bui 1 t there with the present Local Retail
zoning; you could put in a shopping center
which would make more traffic than an apart-
ment complex.
Mr. Ernst asked how this property got zoned
because he never got a notice and he asked
if the zoning could have been changed without
contacting the property owners.
i~r. t~ood asked what it was zoned when he
bought his property.
Mr. Ernst said i t was sel 1 i ng for $15.00 an
acre and they run cattle on it.
e
_.
~.
c,_
Page 14
P & Z Mi nutes.
December 21, 1982
Mr. Hannon asked when this property was
zoned Local Retail.
Richard Russell said it was zoned Local
Retail in August, 1969. He gave Ms.
Calvert a clipping from a newspaper telling
of the proposed development.'
E.~G.~Mackey, 6504 Tabor Street, came
forward. He said he 1 eft Texas for a
while and then moved back. He said he
thought this land would be developed 1 ike
Diamond Loch. Mr. Mackey said at $56,000
an acre, you could have three or four lots
and he felt that North Ri chi and Hi 11 s woui d
benefit more with Single Family zoning
rather than apartments .
Karen Migues, 6624 Tabor Street, .came
forward, She said her opposition had
ai ready been stated by Mr. Ernst. She sal d
they had 1 i ved here 6 months , but they
bought with the intention of raising their
chi 1 dren;~ 1 & 12 years old, there, but they
do not prefer to raise their chi 1 dren next
to apartments .
Mr. Mood asked i f they purchased the 1 of
behind them.
Ms. Migues said they did. She said they
were thrilled to have the additional area.
for their children to play.
Raymond Scott, 6529 Tabor Street, came
forward. He said he agreed with Mr. Ernst.
Mr. Scott said he has to travel to Loop
820 and go through two school zones. He
sal d a 1 of of kids wal k~ to school i n thi s
area and i f thi s zoning i s changed, he does
know how they could compensate for the
traffic.
Mr. Tucker said the Commission only has two
choices, approve the Multi-Family zoning or
deny it, which would leave it Local Retail.
Jim Hackney, 6520 Tabor Street, came forward.
He said he lives just north of the property
in question, and he echos what has already
been said. Mr. Hackney said he had lived
Page 15
P & Z Mi nutes
December 21, 1982
c
~~ here 3~ years and when he bought, he
looked for an economical area to spend
the rest of his 1 i fe. He said he knew
lots were expensive, but $80,000. He
' said he would sell 'his~.for $8,000.
Mr. flood asked what he would rather have
there, Local Retail or Multi-Family.
Mr, Hackney said he had rather have Local
Retail, but he did not feel it would go
over there. He said he had rather have
Single Family there. Mr. Hackney said the
houses in this area are worth from $115,000
to $120,000 now, but he feels they could
get only $80,000 for them if these apart-
ments are built.
Jim Keding, 4140 Rufe Snow Drive, came
forward . He said he had 1 i ved here 26
years and he remembers when Rufe Snow was
only a two lane road. He said the City
told him he couldn't park i n front of hi s
house and the city took some of his land
to widen Rufe Snow. Mr. Keeling said he
remembers when they rezoned a 150 ft. strip
of land facing Glenview for Local Retail
which fell through. He said they wanted
to build some shops; then there was one
time they wanted to bui 1 d a home for the
mentally retarted which fell through. Mr.
Keding said then i n 1969, they planned to
build condos and 2 fami ly residences, and
then sometime or another, it was zoned
Local Retail. Mr. Keeling said he has to
1 eave for work at 6:45 to beat the traffic.
He said he has had cars up in his yard, has.
had the front of his car smashed. Mr.
Keeling said he did some checking and found
that 30 days after apartments are bui 1 t,
crime goes up and the drug rate goes up 10~.
Mr. Keding asked the Commission i f they had
tried to take a bath down Rufe Snow. He
said water comes out the pipes about the
size of a penc i 1.
Mr. Keeling said this property was previously
proposed for condos, $60,000 to $80,000 per
site.
• .
~.
Mr. Hannon asked where he got his source
of information regarding crime and drugs.
Mr. Ked~i ng said from the newspapers and
' the Fort Worth Police Department.
Ron Brown, 6428 Diamond Loch Drive, came
forward. He said he would like to
reaffirm what Mr. Ernst said. Mr. Brown
said it would put an additional burden on
the schools. He said the school children
have to go to school i n pre-fob bui ~ di ngs
now and we don't have enough teachers, now.
Mr. Brown said he bought his property 7
years ago and was assured by the seller
that Local Reta i 1 zoning did not allow
apartments in it.
i~.
Frank beavers , 6512 Tabor Street, came
forward. He said he echos everything
,that has been said. Mr. beavers said he
been in on some of these zoning cases,
but he did not get a l etter when this was
zoned.
Mr. beavers said he has a lot he would
sell for $8,000.
Greg Kankey, 6632 Tabor~Street, came
forward. He said this is his first house
to own. He said he had saved for three
years to be able to get away from apartments.
Mr. Kankey said if these apartments go in,
he wi 11 sell his house.
Marvin Daily, 6640 Tabor Street, came
forward. He said he believes the Commission
has done them a great injustice by approving
the platting on this property.
Page 16
P & Z h1i nutes
December 21, 1982
Jean beavers, 6512 Tabor Street, came
forward. She said she had rather see
retail there instead of apartments, but
she hates to see either there. Ms. beavers
said they had worked all their 1 i fe to
buy a home and they want to put something
1 i ke this behind them.
Mr. Tucker said the Commission has to see
that the plat meets the Subdivision Ordinance
Pa a 17 ~~~~
9
P & Z M~ nutes ~ - ~ -
• December 21, 1982
.,
regarding easements, firelanes, etc. He
said their approval of the platting does
- not mean they can bui 1 d apartments there.
- Mr. Daily asked if these apartments can
go in the present zoning.
Mr, Tucker said they could not.
Mr, C~lood asked regarding the 1 ots these
peop] a own behind their homes , would they
consi der a compromise and work with thi s
developer for duplexes behind their homes.
Mr. Daily said duplexes are one thing and
apartments is another.
Mr, Wood said if they don't compromise, it
will cut off their lots. .
Mr. Daily said he believes Local Retail
zoning should stay there,
Ted Yaggi, 6616 Tabor Street, came forward.
,; He said he doesn't care i f thi s property i s
ever developed ar~d he would gladly sel 1 h i s
property at a fair price.
Vicki 6urson, 6408 King Arthur Ct. , came
forward. She asked if this property could
be zoned for a school.
Mr, Wood said he would like to see a park
there, but the owners of the property have
to request the zoning change.
Ms. Burson said if this is turned down, could ~~
the city buy i t.
- Mr. Tucker said the city could not afford it,
and also, the city is not i n the Real Estate
business.
Ms. Burson said she had called the city and
have always been told she is too late, there
i s nothing she can do.
Mr. Tucker said sbe could petition to speak
before the City Council.
The Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
Page 18
' P & Z Mi nutes
December~21, 1982
.~ ~~ ~Mr, Tucker stated he would not vote on
.' th1's request because he lives in Diamond
loch wfiic~i is in this area, and he
requested that Alternate Member, John
' Schwinger, take his p] ace i n voting on
this case.
Mr. Tucker said he would like to complement
the citizens i n the way they conducted
themselves ,
Mr. Hannon said he wanted to ask Mr. Barrett
where he arrived at the $80,000 figure for
the price of a lot.
Mr. Garrett said this was just an estimate.
He said you take $56,000 per acre, take
some for street and engineering cost,
construction cost, a commi ssi on to sel 1,
etc. Mr. Barrett said he would have a
verified figure before going to council .
Mr, Hannon said he was not sure i t woul d
be that much. He asked how Mr. Barrett
figured the monthly rental price.
~.
Mr. Barrett said he figured i t at 55 cents
per square foot.
Mr, Hannon asked how many apartments would
house school chi 1 dren.
Mr. Barrett said they plan to have 80 one
bedroom apartments which would not have
children, 64 two bedromm apartments, split
level which caters to two singles and only
8 three bedroom apartments which could have
children. He said less than ha]f would
have children.
Mr. Barrett said they went ahead and purchased
the other piece of land so the traffic could
be routed to Glenview. He said the develop-
ment would be i n two phases , but you woul d
not be able to tell when one stops and the
other phase begins, it will go on until all
is complete.
~~ir. Hannon said he would like to make some
comments about what has been said here. He
said with regard to the issue of traffic,
he feels there would be a traffic problem
.,
w .
r
'~
Page 19 ~` (_
P & Z Minutes
December 21, 1982
with any development there, and also,
the property value would probably be
the same whether i t was developed as
retail or apartments. Mr. Hannon said
as far as having transients there and
drug peddlers, etc., he is not sure, but
. at 55 cents a square foot, he could not
afford to live there. He said the $460.00
is more than he pays for his home. ~ Mr.
Hannon said he does not feel they would
have a low class of people in those
apartments.
. Mr. Hannon said someone said North Richland
Hills did not need rental property. He
said Cie thinks that i s i nacurate; he feel s
not all employees of businesses can afford
$115, 000 homes as some on Tabor Street say
they have. Mr. Hannan said in regards to
apartments ~not~ paying their share, he feels
that is nat true; it is a small piece of
property paying a '.larger amount of taxes;
.. they have a water and sewer system they
put in and pay to maintain, but in single
family homes, the city maintains them for
us. Mr. Hannon said he feels that, in a
sense, the apartments are paying more than
their share. Mr. Hannon said he felt that
none of these were valid reasons to turn
down this request.
Ms, Nash made a motion to deny PZ 82-31.
This motion died for 1 ack of a second.
PZ 82-37 ~ Mr. Flood rude a motion to approve PZ 82-31
APPROVED as requested.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and
the motion carried 4-1 with Ms. Plash voting
against.
Chairman Tucker stated this case will be
heard by the City Counci 1 on January 10th
and this is only a recommendation to the
counc i 1 for approval .
Mr. Bowen said with this valid petition, it
will take a 3/4 majority of the council to
approve it.
Mr. Tucker said i t has to be 20~ of the area .
•
_ ..5=g3
t~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~~ 1 3ti~~~''`' Date: -
y + ~ , _
o I-~"~~~
T0: C i t Counc i 1 ~ . 4 ~~ 2
Y
City of North Richland Hills
" -~ ~ ~ Case Flo : ~, ~ l~"~']
1'ie, the undersigned propert oti~~nzrs ~~~i th'
sou ht y ~n t~to hundred ~2D0} feet of the tra
g to be rezoned, hereby object to the rezonin ~ 1 ct•
~ n the a 1 i cati o g of . th~. say d proper~y descry bed
pp n for tl~e fol l os~~i ng reason ~,) : •
~h1s rP~nn~ng,~~ t tive
. to the public safety, health, convenience com •
fort, prospers ty,
~r general tije~ fare
of the resent nei hborhood.
Signature:
Date
Address:
oK•
7!cl1~ A8s-rgocs453
1. ,~ - - - /--- --' -
_ -_. _ _--- -- - -- _ -e~ -,l~Y.-- 3-
oK• ~ At3 ?3~ ~.
7f~tl~ C'
~--z --
sk
-- ---- ~ ;~(p(1~- ABbTQAS.T ~50~
~. /-3 -~3 ~~a gas ~`<<
_ ~~~~~~~~~ ~aasrcw RMUC,wea~a,
ok _ _ _
_ 4
?(i(1 ~ ~n~.~~" Rnuc;Ktrw~
ak. ABs-+~.~- lSSF
~~o ~ ~~
' -~ ~l l/
~~ Nn
r _ e1_'_ ~ ~' 3- ~ 3 ~ ~~ ~ T Ito lI~ ABA ¢ac-~- iS€F'
~K• ~~ ~ ~~ ~C~ d ~o ~ 7
< ~
a kr ` i ~(ol f~ ~tis~encr ISLE
y_ . ~4 ) ~
~7(c t (C 1+tutC... 2A*~c.t~..~tw~0
.~
~! ~
~ . 3 ~ 3 ~ .~ v °j . ~~zx~ a'~,e ~3c.,~ ~ c oT ,
., .
cam.. ; ., ,
k. I ? (a t ~~ -~1 s-fQ~+cr ~ 5~~
1
,.
/ ~~
~~
~t •
t ~
f
~~. "' ' ~
i-v-~3
~7 -'~
.~ ~ / ~
a
, '
. ~.~~_ ~ ~
Date•
,
TO :
. C ' ~
,ty Council ~` °~ ~
.
City of North Richland Hi11s .
---_ Case ~~o: Z- ~z • ~ 7
t~ie, the
sought under~s i gned ro er.t o~~~ner ~ '
P P y s ~» th ~ n
to be rezoned
,hereby object to the
t~~o h~andreci ~Z00 feet of
~ the tract
i
Z n the
appl > cats on for tf~e fol
1 o;~ri ng reason rezon
n of the
g ~ ` sa ~ d
~s ~ : . •
Property descry b?d
to the
public safety, health, convenienc
e,
~ o
comfort, prosp,.r~ ty ' t ti ve
,
or general v~el fare
of the resent nei hborhood. ~~
. .
~gnature: ~ ~ ,,
ok• ~ Date: Address:
~ ~ .
r~. ~ ~ ~t~LY~Ew Aonjilv~;
- _ __ __ _ ._. D
o _ _.. - . _._ .w ____..._ .
~ ~ ~ f ~ µ r w. v~R~cr r~oti~ aN
~ ~ __ __ .._. _ _ a
~ ~(• - .....___ .__. ~_-- _ _.4 -__.._ _____._
3. ~ ~, ~ f 3 8~ ~ ~ N~~.~.vtEw ~:ao,T;va~
~~~
r ~ _ . ~ 7o S
o ~ ~ _.
~,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ µri~ V ~ F.w ADO ~Tic~~
_ _ . `r.,.~. r
l d / ~71~ .
r __ _.. t
~k
' ~ ~ ~ ~iL~VI£.cc! AOO~TiO~
,I~i ~ l ~ / ~ ~~
~~~
G~ho y .L~ r~ }~
.. . _ .. _ ___ _... ~ u E ~ ~ r ~
. ...
N~u.v,E~, a~ov,r~~a
1L, ,
~~ 3 ~3
~ o ~"
r~~~~~~~ ~~0 i7icw
~~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ 3
w
g. .;~ ; , ~~ ~ ~.
., fit, .
r
,-
i r. 4 ~
' I Ir '~
~' ~r /' .,
~~ GL
~ ) ^
- ,.
o~
~.
'.~~9~.~~~.._ ~.:~ ~..~ ~.
t. / Z/
a~
G~"1,1,
`11~n,-h, «,,~ ~ ti~,~~~~
pk~~
r-> ~' ~
~~~~b'3
//~~J'3
~/~/~3
~y~5 ~
i/ J /:f s
~y~~ 3
y ~~ 3
%/
~/~~~,
• A bS7 :-c 7 l5 ~~
~~. ~ ~, .
~A~TO n, QA~, ~(,p~u p
. _ . ~ ~~T S
//. r1~5~.•~~7 138'
!O
. ~ ~ .~
.. .... l ~,~-c r ~~~5
~ ~~~. ~~.
~ j~~LLJ~~ ~}QDi'Tl~d+~
N~`~~ Raa,cu ~~~uv
. ~ G
~~ 3~ . ~
r~bsr:~c7 ~5~~
s~~~
~ / ~~T
~s~~
C~~~
-~u~~
,-
d ~ ' i ,~,9 t J' ,~ 8 ~ ~
~ a~~ ~
~ ~r't~ ~. o T ~ ~
~~~rk~-
r~
TQ~
RE;
THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL
Z Fs ~ -37 0""
Zoning Application of Daryl R. Barrett with BWBM Partnership
to rezone Tracts 2B4 & 286, Abstract 1568, J.M. Vandusen
Survey, from their present classification of Local Retail to
a proposed classification of Multi-Family.
Mr. Mayor and Council Members;
we respectfully request that the entire body of this petition
be read into the record of the Public Hearing regarding the above
referenced zoning application.
We, the undersigned, request a delay on the decision to rezone
the above mentioned property until the proper environmental impact
studies can be conducted to enhance and determine the best use of
this land for the fallowing reasons;
1. what will the proposed development do to the already overcrowded
local streets?
2. How will the proposed development impact already overcrowded
local schools?
3. How will the project affect water and sewage usea e?
~ g
4. will the development have an effect on water runoff and
flooding?
r~
u
~~ Cw,~,
1.X43'1 I.Q.C.~;~,u, I~ .
i ~. ~~ L~o~ ~~
i~.
~~~~
~~~
~a ~~-f dc,w~~ ~r--
y, ,~ ~.~wL~-
ro, ~~ ~id~n/
~ ~. C~
6 ~~ ~ ~~ ~~
~'~f3a ~eunv~sG.ue~
4~
~y~ ~f~
1f ~ ` ~ ~
Co ~- z ~L
~~a~
v ~
~~
~~ ~
l
A i
.~.-t
E ,
~~, 1 i 1,
~C~' ~~
1 ~
~, ~~~
~ Wiz.-~-Z'-~~----
s ,~
.Y. ~ ,
r
~J j ~:
~., ~t
~~
) I. ~~
' ~i ~' ~i
' q ~ j 7
r-,.
l,i U Z G l~e.~z~~~ !'-~ ~-~ ~ r
,~. ~~:_.
' ~ ~/
t-'' V~
~+~L~.r
r
~~ "~~~r~J ~'r'~
~~
J ~-l ~~ \r
~ . f ~~
,`.,. ~
"y~i~o~as'
~~.~=mad'
y~S' 46~ a
~gS _ 7o3g'
'-{~S-y3L3
s~~'- y~3a
asp- ~~~5
ail-ory L
old/ - DJ 9 L
577-14y3
~S'~r- (o o ~l
oz~~- 0 4~7
{~ !(
-~s ~v
~~~-~ . o ~
~~~ s -~. ~
G s~ ~ q ~d ~
~9~'-~ ~3
ZS'r_ /l ~ z
a ~i- ~~y/
~~., ~,,..~,w ~2,~ ¢SD ~ C~,~~ ~-~ti~, del- 3.~ 9~
zsQ;T,,~,.~-t~ ~o-.~ ~ 5 ~ ~ Cam, C~,,,k~. ~x ~ ~ ~ ~ 72 : ~
/ ,~~/~
`~y~ ~; QQ~,~,~, ~ ysc~ ~,~I ~F 7
p~~ O
~~h luz~~.ri>c;L /~~L+.i~/ti~u~c~~ bSiOCJ,dwrcn..caf ~ C~Q7
r~~,
3~~~ ~~~ ys/~ ~~~e~~~~ ~9l-9s"a q
7
~,~r~,l-.ate-~'~y~~~ „Ca~cLe, ~'~c~,~~z.(1~, a8!-`~~~~
t~P.a. F~~~~.t~ taY~unali G ~{~ ~I.iz.:~.a.,~wi~ ~ ~ dl' c! ~!' .'r
e j L'
,= ,c.,~ ~, ;.f.~~, ~sos l'ASf/ ~,,~~'/ urn'-/C77
/~~/L ~' ~1.~~,,,y-~/v_-" y7<_~r~,/-.i fiip i C~sf~cL~a;~7~ ~~ ~(S%-~~LSS
yi )n~. ~ 7~ ~.d c~eain~Fi~- d5~3(A'stFC ~.aa~P~ 4~8-24''6
K`~I~ °'- ~ L~~ ~/J~s~-C~ Gf~o~ 5«„c,-~s~ c'1 Sl~f'.5=/~s~
.Lj. ~,~. tx r-
4`I
4~
47
YJ
;-
~ ;~~
~~
~~~
,,
w
~~
sz.
SJ ( ~,_C~~~,~.A~-a~~~iJ
~•~s
sy
5~5~
SE
S7
S ~'
~~ -
~_/.
6 ~/3 ~, „~.,4-~,,~ o ~.~~/,
~y13 .rt/~ ie ~(/it ,
-~
~y/R 2~0 ~
~ c
6~~~ ~~~~~-~-
~Ua~ 1Y1~~AaL/(~.uiu
~~~~ I-f-~.~OF_Cyj 42 c ter.
~~a~t ~IEi4eLf3~/R~ c~
~y~ ,~-~~d~~s. ~
~~ ~ 6 ~e~cL~.~l~.~ Gt
ti
~ ~~i °ht ~.~~~~
6 ~l
s
6~
66
4
~~P~ ,~
• ~~ i
~~
v
i
/ ~i
j~
i
O ~
i
i
,, ~
,.
I
r ~~~~~
G~ G~c
E9 ~
~o j
l
~z
~~ ' ~~~
~ ~1
6 y~~ / /~~.~/a n/~ rite PN~/
~~ ~~ a ~~
_G ~a 9 d0.~.,0
to `~2~ ~/.Gi~r~i/.C~J~n~J
(-~~ p ~ ~-.~_
~~ ~-~ ~ y~
7~
1,~.
77
e
~t~G'~ `l~in~~ ~
r--
7~!' ~lG,~ LN__
_,
~9i~~-K, ~ l~~ ~_
G ~l~s ` /,/;
.,c.lc~.,. ,.~ ~ i 6 ~%1 A~/I.
~'
~_/
3 ~~~~.c
i
Icy ~~~. ~~
n
18s
i ~~
T~.~
.~
f
j
~~ Q~ A An C(\ti~-
~~e ~
-r--
6y3~ o~~~
(v~Zo ~ %~~,~ ~x~
G~fty ,L~.c~~o~
y3 ~~ti~ ~'l~ ~ S~~I, J (oti05 c5.~-,m~^'~ ~ .
gy M~, ~~,~ ~~~~~~e~~~`~ ~~o~ ~ c~
q~ /rr. ~+J~rs S'kar,~ P56orn~ ~sNnk~ CoyE1TE
9v G/~'~~~~4~00~'"~~ -r c~"~
~~~ ~ AJ In ~/d o ~ Gi' C~
~~ ~ ~~. ~~/' ~ ~/~ /j
~~"-~'~ C~/> .~[~ ~~r-~~ - 6404 K,~(~w,s ~
~~~ ~~c Z'- ,~i~ n-`-' - ~to~ -~;,,~ Gam C-~.•
r~3 ~ ~~ l~yoa ~w+y ~~.
r
cos ~1a ~-~,n~~ ~-e-a-cl~ ~ya~ ~,mc~0~.1~w1~ c~,
lab p~ ~ 1'f~''~'~
iu~ -~ia.~rr.~ `~ b41b ~~ ~khcu C~.
~~y
Gs~-~ ~.
,~°~,~ /~
/ ii ~~
na ~ ~ ~.Q«u~l°e-~
~ ~ K ~-v, ; :rf/~ ~~. ~ a ~~ ii
r
..~
~ .~~ ~°
., ,-
~q ~
~~ ~
,' , ... ~ I I f ~
~~~ ~ ! /
•
~~
TO : North Rich3.and Hills ~'~'~
Planning & Zoning Commission
• Zyoning Application of Daryl R. Barrett with BWBM Partnership to
rezone Tracts 2B~, & 2Bb, Abstract 1588, J. M. Vandusen Surve from
~',
their Present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification ,
of Multi-Family.
Mr. Chairman and Commission Members:
We respectfully request that the entire body of this petition be read
into the record of the Public Hearing regarding the above referenced zonin
g
application.
We, the undersigned, strongl o ose this a lication for
y pp pp the following
reasons :
.The proposed zoning application will impact negatively on propert values
y
of surround established single-family neighborhoods.
20 The proposed development will greatly increase traffic on alread
y
overcrowded Rufe Snow creating traffic dams and further rendering the
nearby single-family neighborhoods an undesirable area in whcih to live.
3. The proposed development will bring in uncaring transient residents with
an increase in crime and drugs.
4o We believe the existing Local Retail zoning was a mistake when granted
some years ago. However, to change to the proposed zoning will further
compound the error - ft will be a classic example of Spot Zoning.
5. The developer will be able to construct his buildings on his property
so that they will literally be looking into the backyard of our homes.
~, r'
r
1
.~
~ ~ ..
t'
r
6. Each of us has a sizable investment in our pro ert The a licant ha
p y pp s
no such investment. He will not be hurt if this request is denied --
we will ALL be hurt,
7. When the apartments are completed, the applicant will take his profit
and run -leaning us, the citizens of North Richland Hills,. to live
with the problems his apartments create.
We ask each of you to consider long and hard the ramifications his
proposed application will have -all negative, The onl ositive as ect
3~ p p
would be his profit. The City and the surrounding neighborhoods will
realize NOTHING positive.
You are serving on the Planning and Zoning Commission to represent the
wishes of the citizens of North Richland Hills. We ask that you do so now
denying this zoning request.
ADDRESS
okl. uµ~ ~P (v U8 T Gaz-
ok 5.'~'t ~ 7Jl~o. d~~cJ lc,~,e~.
ok8. ~1.~d-~~~.~y/~
k12; ll.~l~.~Y /~ie/
130
~c.i4.
. ,
~~~u~-
,a~
t ~ r
J'~21 ~ Y ~j %-~-~~~'.
~~
~ G~z a ~.~
GC> 3a T/~oa~
~~~ 7~b~
~~J~ ~~~
~~i~ T~~
6 6 z o r,,s<K
6~ /z r~~--
6~ ~,~ ~~~
TELEPHONE
a 8i-i~~a
vas- ~~~ y
L~/ - 6 yu(
~-!~?~3G
ate/ 3si3
yGS- vv; o
~8~- ~~/~
a~i a~~p
v~=~ -7 ~
NAME ~ ADDRESS ~ TELEPHONE
i~. 2~t3 ~~v.e.,.~ Asia ~6rz- ~8~ ~/3a~
~ 9. `~'/+. ~' ~7~h~vi.~/ '~ ~ ~ae~t. 6so8 .,~yG-~ i~~s- G ~G.s-
i9. ?~9-r. ~;'~,/'i~dG~E~c,~ 6soq ~~~ 656- 3 °O~
zo. ~L~~. ~~~J ~L~e ~~¢- ~~`1 ~~' 6SG --acv
U
z2 ~_r-~ ~~ ~ 5~o c a ,Qiu~-6~ fl-~•G~
z3. ~;~7 ~' ~lL'u~ 5~..¢~~ z~~ ~f~`iz ~C~w>,:~f,~'~~1.l~> ~~r- i~riy
2a. "i~.,,.,~ ~n;,,, .~ ~ ~,!.~z~u ~ ~lyo ~ ,dim-M..:,( ~R,c,. ~~' ~~~~`Y
oKZb. /~za7~ ~4r~ ~•1~~~~ G7oo
~S'i,iGo~
okz~. ~,~p~~..,~7/~~, ~,,,~~~-~,Q,Q~ 67e6 ~Pi-i~o a'
28.G""~~'' 7 n G71/ Yy+r~`~' °a$'~-DG9~
~i ~O 7// r/un`'~ ~ g5-~y55
3~' T ~((_ .~~n- ~ X705 ~ cf~~-~/0~
d~~~~'"' x/`18- 553`/
dc32. ~ ~ ~ 0 1 Jti'-~~`~-
oK33.c-~~~
34. ~~~e~a.F._.n~ ~~ l I 9'v\c,~n. X145- 41l ~I
38. ~J'1ize~~ f~~a~. ~ ~iLiyo /i7°.~~ ?d~/-5~~3~
~ 7 0 5 "7y1 av~-a'ti ~-1~ 9 5' _ 0 7 y~ ~
40. ~ ~- h~z . 7~,..:- A~ l~ (~ 40 1 4l~a ~ ASS 3 ~ a
43. ~f~- ~ `/1/r/tQ-, ~7'/I~,uv lP '~/~/~ ,~.,La~~ua..a~o`~~~ ~/- 7g/y
1
~x
a
f ~ ,v
NAME ~'~
ADDRESS
n2a. d me> ~~ LJ,~~r/ 6~S 7~4o.e
50. .~-m-~....~
5i.~r~
53. ~ C~~."~ " ,<s-,.,,.,
54. 0. ~ p-virc~
55. ~ ~ ~i'"`
sb. o,.~ -~1.~
5,. ~ ~~
~~~
60. `~l,
6~. ~~,~
62. ~~/'' ~ G.INdu~n.
64. ~Q,~.~,4'~f'
65. j ova
67.
i ti
~.
bgo
A~
70.
72~
~'.
G G 3 7 ~.RGxa.~,
/~37
TELEPHONE
a~i 7v~3
~9~ ~9~6~
L~/- / 3 ~ ~
~ A/ -i~~~
~~~, osa9
~g~- 6 ll ~
~~i~ y~.s- oa 9s
~b o y .~ ~~~i/~6
~ 6 o q ~.f 57 ~i/ 6~
~boSTAbo2 a~i5sa~s
~s 3> a~
(o s ~ 9 Tgbor
~ys Tom
C~ T~/Sae
to SC 7 (a.~
~s(7 ~~
Gs ~ p TQ-~.
~ b o,5 %.~.eo,~
6Ta S ~ ~-
y9~ a37~
~ 98=a 3 ~8
s~~s =sib ~
~`l~ -3~6 v
~~8- 3J~bo
~ ~s = 7d-~
5 ~7 -~a ~
s7 ~- iriYa
73.
I
I
~'
U
r-
~`
c
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
December 13, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Nil 1 s
1301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 16118
Re; 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING PLAT REVIEW PS 82-31
L.R. TO M.F. GRID 138 & 141
We have received the referenced zonin case for our •
that we could g review and find
adequately locate this property on the zonin ma
should it be passed b both the •g p
• y Planning & Zoning Commission and
the C1ty Council .
r
RICHARD W. ALB I N, P. E,
RWA/1 j c
cc: Per. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 617/283.6211 • METRO/267.3367
~~
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN .ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS,.
.~ SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE X179, ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICNLAND NTLLS, TEXAS,
PASSED, APPROVED,~AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION~AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RTCHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13,
1967 , AS~ AMENDED JANUARY ZT, 1915
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AHD PUBLIC NEARING THE FOI.LOWiNG, RECOMMENDATION TS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CYTY~ OF NORTH RTCHLAND ~{ILt,S 6Y THE .
PLANNING AND ZONING COhq~ISSTON:
RESOLVED that on Case Na. PZ . 82-37 ~ ~ the fo11 o~ti ng descrt hed property sha1~1.
be rezoned from local e~tai~1~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~to
Multi-Famil .. ....... ..... ............ .,.... ...
. FIRST TRRCT-SITUATED i r~~ Tarrant County, Texas and bei ng a part of the J .M.
Vandusen Survey, Abstract 1588, and being a portion of the 703.58 acres
tract conveyed to Evanda P. Haltom by the deed recorded in Volume 3185,
Page 627 of the Tarrant County Deed Records;
COMMENCE at a 3/4" steel rod for the intersection of the 4~lest 1 i ne of
Rufe Snow Drive and the North line of Glenview Drive, being the Southwest~~
of the right-of-way for Rufe Snow Drive as defined i n Volume 4722, Page
520 of said Deed Records, and sai~.d steel rod being 52 feet West from the
East line of said survey and 56.7 feet North from the South line of said
survey; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '.
THENCE North 89 degrees 26 minutes Test, along sand North line of Glenview.
Drive, 790.3 feet to a 3/4" steel rod;
THENCE North 0 degrees 46 minutes East l00 feet to a 3/4" steel rod for the
South~~vest and beginning corner of the tract being described;. .
THENCE North 0 degrees 46 minutes East, 468.7 feet to a 3/4" steel rod in
the South line of the 98,28 acres Tract.#2 in the deed to Lillian Randle
Haltom recorded in Volume 3186, Page 631 of said Deed Records;
THENCE East along said tract line, 800 feet to a 3/4" steel rod for the
Northwest corner of said right-of-way for Rufe Snow Drive and being 32.7
feet West from the East line of said Uandusen Survey;
THENCE South 0 degrees 46 minutes West along the West line of said Rufe
Snow- Drive right-of-way, 476.6 feet to a 3/4" steel rod;
THENCE North 89 degrees 26 minutes West, 799.93 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 8.68 acres of land.
f
' ..
Page 3 ~ ~ ~- ~ . ~ ~ , ~ ~ :~
. ,.. ~ ,.
..
,, .. ,.. .
• i •~ ~ ~ +
. .~ ~ ,.
•~
• ~
. . ~ . . , ' •
~ - ~ .
~~ ~ ~T~~ s ro ert ~ Chas ~a ~ 416160 f t: fro~nta a on the ~ W s ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~.
P P Y e sad ~ e
~: ~ Snow .D~ri ve. at 'the ~ i ntersecta on ~ of Mi key Street and ~ Manor Avenue and ~ extends .~ ~ ~ .
Westward 1279.4 ft. and ~th~e back .4.19.4 ~ t. ~ extends South a distance of 1164
~'' ~ f~. ~~~to Gl envi ew~ Dri ve.. ~ . ~ ~: ~ . ~: ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~..~
,.
APPROVED 8Y THE PLANNING AHD., ZQNIHG ~C~ISSION THIS 21st . ~~~ OAY OF
.~
. ~ ~ .. ..
,. _ , .
C I HN NG D ZON I NG C01~MI SS I OH
~~ ~ ~ .• ~.
~.
. .
. ~. ,
..
. 8E IT .ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ~OF TKE CITY OF NORTH RICNLA~iO HILLS AC~TIHG
IN REGULAR SESSI4K THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIaEO .PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 82-31 ~ IS
HEREBY ~ REZOl~EQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ : .. ~ .:
THIS
. ~ ~ ..
. ~ ~ ~ ...
.
YOR DICK FARAM ~ •
. ..
CITY OF NORTH RIC'~NLAHD~ ~HILL~~ ~~
Y•
. , // ~
1 ~ .
aTTESr: • ~ ~~
. .
~~
. ,
C SCR R E TT R ~. ~ .
CITY OF NORTH RICNLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS 10 FQRM AHD LEGALITY
CITY TTQRNEY
CITY OF f~4RTH RICNLAND HILLS
r
~~
I
^
DATE: ~ % p~'
. v. 6, _1~i3
..
.
~ r
'.
.. SUBJECT:. _ ~~ from Multi-Famil and Local Retail to Commercial
. ,. ,.
'on ortions of Tracts 1C & 1D, Abstract 1588, J. M. vandusen Survey
DEPARTMENT: ~ nd onin
• ,
..
BACKGROUND:
a ed at the northwest corner of Rufe. Snow Dr~ve~ and
. .
. , • ~•
-.
~ ~ r
•
. ~ • • ,
•• •
R.C. Breakell Holdin s, Inc. is requesting this zoning request~to conform with the zoning
. ~ ..
to the north. - ~ ~ ~ . •~
. ~ ..
,,
There were 6 property owners contacted, but no opposition. •~
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning, request.
.,•
CITY COUt3CIL ACTION REQUIRED: A royal or denial of zoning request.
~~1'~GETED ITE~'i: '~~r:S NO X
AC~OUI~T 1~UZ~ER: N/A .
~~a~
v.~~.~~..r.r.~~~s~~r~.~r.r....~~~r~~_w.~r ~~r~~.~r....~~r~~.~~_..~~r. YY~.~~wri_~~~rw~~~~ ~.~~.~r.~.+~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~.~~~~~r~~
.~ t
Page 20 ~~
P & Z '~inutes ~~~`~
Decet~ber 21, 1982
~~ RECESS
The Chairman ca]ied a recess at 9:45 P. M.
BACK TO OP,D ER The Chairman called the meeting back to
order at 9:55 ,P. M. with the same members
present.
13. PZ 82-38 Request of R. C. Breakell Holdings, Inc.
to rezone portions of Tracts 1C & ID,
Abstract 1588, J. M, Vandusen Survey,
from their present classification of
Multi-Family R~ Local Retai 1 to a proposed
cl assn f ~ cats on of Commercial .
This property i s located at the Northwest
corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Northeast
Loop 820. .
Bil) Crowson came forward to represent
R. C. Breakell Holdings, Inc. Ne said
they were requesting a change from Multi-
Family & Local Retail to Commercial.
Mr. Tucker asked what the property will
be used for.
~~
~_.
ti9r. Crowson said it would be a type of
shopping center. He said they have 18 ::
acres at the Northwest corner of Rufe
know and 820, 4 or 5 acres being zoned
Multi-Family and the rest is zoned Local.
~'etail. Mr. Crowson said there is another
44 acres of Multi-Family to the west and
then a strip of Commercial. He said they
may come ~ n 1 ater for another zoning
change on some of it.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
.called for those wishing to speak in favor
of this request to please come forward .
There being no one wishing to speak, the
Chairman called for those wishing to
speak i n opposition to this request to
please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, the
Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
PZ 82-38 Mr. Hannon made the notion to approve
APPROVER PZ 82-38 as requested. This motion was
seconded by dir. Gowen and the motion
carried 5-0.
.t` 1~
I
~.
C
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Wonh-Dallas
December 13, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hi 11 s
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hi 11 s, Texas 76118
Re; 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND NILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW PS 82-38,
M.F. & L. R. TO COM. GRID 111 & 120
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find
that we could adequately 1 ocate this property on the zoning ma
should it be assed b p
• p • y both the Pl ann ~ ng & Zon ~ ng Comma ss ~ on and
the CT ty Counci 1.
r
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/1 j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
:~
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 •817/283-6211 • METRO/267-3367
~ .I
p~ 9a-~8
TRACT III - A :
' 6E IrJG A 1 8 . ~~c~9 ACkE TRACT OF ~ AND UuT OF THE ~i . M. VAN GUSEN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT N0. 1588, ~TARkANT C(:JUNTY, TEXAS, SAID TRACT BEING MORE
PART 1 CU~ARL Y DE SCR I NED RY METES AND E30UNDS AS F~I.LOWS ~
BtGINNIf~G AT A F'~INT FOR CORNER IN THE NORTH RIGHT--OF--wAY l1NE OF
INTERSTATE HIGHwtiY Lr)r-P 82~~, SAID POINT EsEING 398.45 FEET
SCIUTH 8 ~° 1 5' 3t-~' WEST ~ Ri)M Tr-iE INTERSECT I(~N OF SAID RIGHT -OF~-wAY
LINE ',~'ITFi THE WE~;T ~IG~T -n~ wAY ~ INF OF RUFE SNC)w ROAD
THENCE 5C)u1 H dy ° 1 5' 3~" wE ~~T Al t)NG THE r~[~RTF~ RIGHT CAF rVA Y LINE OF
INTERSTATE HIGHWAY t_t~~~P g2~~, A DISTANCE OF 687.12 FEET T[l A POIP~T FQR
CGRNER;
TNErJCE N{~RT~t ~~;~° 1 5' ~: j' wEST A UI STANCE OF 7b1 , y8 FEET TU A POINT FCJR
CGRNER;
THENCE EAST A GI ~~;TANCE OF 1 ~;h3. 72 FEET TU A PUiNT FUR CGRNER IN THE
WEST k I GNT i)F wA ~' ~ I NE OF RUFE SNOW ROAD ~
THENCE 50UTH U-° 23' 25" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT•~DF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE
OF 575 , 2b FEET TAE A FOINT FCJR CGRNER IN THE NORTHWEST LINE OF
A 7r' W I OE TE `~CC~ TRACT s
THENCE SOUTH 65° 53' t~8" wEST ALONG THE NORTHWEST LINE OF SAID TESCO
TRACT, A DISTANCE ~JF 435.1 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND
OrvTAIf~I~JG 784, 44'x, t)~~b2 5(~UARE FEET OR 18. Ufl~~ ACRES OF LANp.
T~?ACT III-E~:
BE IivG A c7.218 ACRE TRAC. T t~F LAND UU1 OF THE J. M. VAN DUSEN SURVEY,
AFiSTRAC T NU . ; 58b , TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID (~. 2 16 ACRE TRACT HE ING
MORE PARTICULARLY GESCRIBEO 8Y METES AND 80UND5 AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINr~ING AT A POINT FOR CORNER, SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTI{1N QF
THE NORTH RIGHT--OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HIGMMIAY LOOP 820 WITH T'H~
PRESENT R I GMT--OF --WAY .LINE QF RUFE SNOW ROAO~
THENCE SOUTH 89° 15' 3~' WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT--pF-WAY LINE OF
INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 62C), A DISTANCE OF 20y.40 FEET TO A POINT FOR CUR~NER
SAIQ POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY FINE WITH THE
SOUTHEAST ~ I NE OF A 7 5' w I DE TE SCO TRACT ; '
T HENCE NORTH b5 ° 5 3' 48' EAST ALONG THE SOUTHEAST L
INE OF SAID TESCO
TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 228.72 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER IN THE PRESENT
EVES T R I GHT~- qF -WAY LINE OF RUFE SNOW ROAD ~
THENCE SOUT~~+ 0~~° 2 3' ~~5" EAST ALONG THE PRESENT WEST RIGHT -OF-WAY LINE
OF kUFE SNOW ROAD, A DISTANCE OF yU.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
ANG CONTA I rJ I NG y , 5 c)~ , (~ n 5 SC~UARE FEET QR (~ . 2 1 A ACRES of LAND .
1 e ~
R
,, .
J - C[1 '~
. ~, ~,,
r;
` V u
v
Z
i•
.. ,.
! Y
~.~! 1'~5~.. 4~Y
f ~~~
''~. i' ~'~°~
q.~'~ i.,
~
" '.,M1
.
•~;:
Nt-iEr T H I NE • J . M . ~,~ AN ~~ ~ _, E: rv
AE~STf~tiET rvn . 1 58r
~• i_~k rE ,
ly e+
rF• .
~~.
~~;_
''T w1 a~+',
r ~
~ .F
__ ._. EAS1 1;..~N3.4h'
~ p f_r
,
.. . ~ '
. ~ E' ~wE:R L INtr ~ P.P, ~
P4 ~~
,fir.
M;~'
~ `~'''
~"~. ..'
I.~~,~
,-
`r
~',
I
~' V
,?
x
~;
.R.
~ I :~ .
i.
3
•
~~
lj1
H
~J
T
~- .
cu
n ?.
Z
~~
. t
2
j ~ l~r„ '
1 ~ ~~
~,~.: .
V(~L UME 71 4 y , F~AGE 5y ~ f ~,'~~~~~~:
~ tt ~ :"~`
rl ~ ~ 1~ ,r } ~ M
. ~~
,•.`Ny
~-
:~ TE EL TGwER ' ~ ~~'~~~`~
~~~ 3' C~~NCF~E TE ~ ~;~'~~~~
~ ..
,~
. ~~°.,
. , ; ~'
- ;~~-
TkAC T I I ~ ~ ~ ~;,-.
~ w~;.,_.
~ ^~ 4~1
Q ~~ ~°
• V
~~ •~'
. ~~•-~
t •,
a
~,
. , ;,
~ , ,.,
;.
~ :y~~.
1 ~ ~.-
. ~,
1i i~~
I ~:.
~~ 1 ±' 4+•
,,
Q ~ , ,...
~d; ,
W - :, ~.
r '~
~ ,,.~';
STEED Tt~Vr'E-~ -' ,
C~f~ 3' C~NC~ETE a ~' ~ ~',~.~' .
.-
M
1 .R. ~
IAE c T 1 183 . 7c' i .
c
z ~ ~ ,
~ z , . ~ - ~. ~ . .a,
r , r ~!
l7. ' ~ i '~ t i.,, ~~ ~
W ~ 'r
3 ~;
a~
1 ~ :~~ ~ ~.~~ z
N
TRAC 1 III -- A I ~ 1
~~l EEl Tl7WER ~ L •Z
{
r)N 3' Ci?NCRE TE a ~ ~
1
1W?
i ~~~ }
I ~~~
~ ~ r~•~
,.
TfAC 1 I I J A ~•? 4, ,r
~'~.~ 1 NT iaF~ fiE:~ V 1 NN 1 !VG u~
h'.u. w. ~. INE ,+'.~~ G~ ~
~,> >• ,~.
ti .' ~ - x
I
i' - 'bt
~~ ~.~"
h
~,;
ORD I NAHCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN .ACCQRDANCE
~IITH ARTICLE XXIX CHARGES AND AMEN~IENTS, .
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #119, ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RTCNLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
PASSED, APPR0I~ED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNTHG
AND ZONING COMMISSION~AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RTCNLAND HILLS, N'OYEMBER 13,
1961, AS~AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1915
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLt,O~ING. RECOMMEiVDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TKE CITY OF NORTFt RrCC~LAND }IILl.S BY 1NE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 82-38 '.the follows°ng descrfibed prgperty sha1~1.
be rezoned from Local Retai~~and~Multi=F.a~ily ~' ''''' ~o
. ... ~- ..
Commercial. ~ " "
TRACT III-A: ~~
BEING an 18.009 acre tract of land out of the J.M. Yan~dusen Survey, Abstract
1588, Tarrant County, Texas, said tract being more particularly described by
metes and bounds as follows:
. BEGINNING at a point for corner i n the north right-of-way 1 i ne of Interstate
Highway Loop 820, said point being 398.45 feet South 89 degrees 15 minutes
30 seconds West from the intersection of said right-of-way line with the west
right-of-way 1 i ne of Rufe Snow Road;
THENCE South 89 degrees I5 minutes 30 seconds West along the north right-of-way
line of Interstate Highway Loop 820, a distance of~681.12 feet to a point for
corner;
THENCE North ~ 00 degrees 15 minutes 03 seconds !hest a distance of 761.98 feet
to a point for corner; ~ .
THENCE Eas t a distance of 1083.72 feet to a point for corner i n the west
right-of-way line of Rufe Snow Road;
THENCE South 00 degrees 23 minutes 25 seconds East along said right-of-way
1 i ne, a distance of 575.28 feet to a point for corner i n the northwest 1 i ne
of a 75 ft. wide TESCO tract;
THENCE South 65 degrees 53 minutes 08 seconds West along the northwest line
of said TESCO tract, a distance of 435.22 feet to the point of beginning and
containing 784,449.0982 square feet or 18.009 acres of land.
TRACT III-B:
BEING a 0.218 acre tract of land out of the J.M. vandusen Survey, Abstract
1588, Tarrant County, Texas, said 0.218 acre tract being more particularly
described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a point for corner, said point being the i ntersecti on of the
north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway Loop 820 with the present
right-of-way line of Rufe Snow Road;
~~
DATE:__ Januarv 1Q. 198
SUBJECT:, Public He in - 1811 Ma
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: A e askin tha •
.. ~ ~, ,.
be held to determine if a ublic nuisance exis ed
where a Nurser School is bein o erated. No
,.
the residents that si ned the eti o n
,.
' notified. ~ '~
• ~- ~ .
__._ ~ .
__
....... ~ . w....rw.++r.r..~w...r..r.rwv+.rr.r.w.~~wr~,.~.~..~~r„r~ rr~.~~r.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
E7`~:,sx~'~:Ei~ I~'~:M: YES NO NIA
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
r-1
LJ
s '
T0: CITY COUNCIL
8. ~~
i/- a~ ~'~
~>~/
CITY OF 1~ORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
We the undersigned propert~ owners in close proximity to 7817 Maplewood or Lot 8,
Block 7 object to the past present and future use of those premises for a child
care facility and to the c ntemplated future use of such premises for a child care
f acility. ~ The basis for o r objection are:
1. The iIImaediate past, resent and future use constitutes a private nuisance
for those of us rune iately adjacent to such property.
The facilities locat d at 7817 Maplewood Drive, Lot 8, Block 7 Clearview addi-
tion known as North Richland Preschool is directly across from a one family
dwelling at 7816 Map ewood Drive. Adjacent to the property at 7817 Maplewood
drive to the East is a one family dwelling located at 1821 Maplewood Drive.
Directly behind .the remises at 1817 Maplewood Drive is a one family dwelling
at Stanley.
._
2, The immediate past u e constituted a public nuisance for the rest of us in the
neighborhood and for the city as a whole.
3. The continued use no and in the future of these premises for the purpose of a
child care center wo ld be both a public and a private nuisance to us and to
the city as a whole.
The reasons that the child care use constitutes a nuisance are as follows:
1. So much traffic is generated by the center at certain times of the day that
the street cannot be used by the rest of the neighborhood.
2. The cars stopping to let out children and pick up children at the premises in
question cause traffic stoppage so as to prevent oy,r use of the public street
and the use of the street by the general public.
3. The noise created b the facility, both traffic and otherwise, prevents close
neighbors from enjoyable use of thier homes.
4. The nuisance of a large co~nercial sign in the front yard of the premises located
at 7817 Maplewood D~'ive.
5. A large commercial rash dumpster located in the front yard of the premises at
7817 Maplewood Drive.
6. Traffic in and out of facility at 7817 Maplewood Drive are using and blocking
driveways of neighbgrs here and.ar,ound premises located at 7817 Maplewood Drive.
~ •
1. Individuals deliver~.ng and picking up children are walking across surrounding
neighbors yards to ~nter the premises located at 7811 Maplewood Drive.
8. Children are not pr~perly supervised at the premises located at 7817 Maplewood,
and have been seen andering through the neighborhood because individuals are
allowing children t leave from their car in the street to enter the premises
at 781,~Maplewood D ive because there are no facilities to enter or leave the
premises at 1817 Ma lewood Drive.
9. Traffic to and from the premises at 7817 Maplewood Drive is endangering the
lives of children w~o live in the 7800 block of Maplewood Drive. Automobiles
will drive in and b ck in neighboring driveways and yards. Several times
children have almos been killed when traffic uses the neighborhood driveways
and yards to enter ~nd turn .around.
10. Traffic to and from the facilities located at 7817 Maplewood Drive is causing
damage to the neigh ors driveways, shrubs, trees and grass by driving and walk-
ing across yards to enter or leave premises located at 7817 Maplewood Drive.
11. Employees of sai~d-f~cilities located at 7817 Maplewood Drive do not have any
parking facilities ~nd thus are parking in front of and many times blocking
driveways .
We have deed restrictions against this use to which subject property has been put.
We ask the Council's cooperation enforcing our deed restrictions.
We have, individually and
over a period of years.
We know that our property
present and future use of
collectively, objected to city officials about the facility.
values have been, and will be deminished by the past,
the property in question as a child care facility.
We ask that the City Coun il, after hearing, declare that a public a private nui-
~'
cance is created by use o the premises at and further ask
that the Council order th nuisance abated by whatever means available.
Signed on the dates sh
Date
~;M~ /r~ i vga
„ram >6 J 98 z-
below:
,,~ Signature Address ~
~, I
i
~ CL ; ~
~_
~--~, - f., /,
/ ~
7~as ~
~~- ~ ~-~~
-/ ~ ~2-
1 -- ~ ~-
.~
//_ /4 _ 82
L~- i 9-~a
9 ~
• it i4 B
!/ z~
a ~,-
~/v
~ r ~ ~i
'i~J~
~~ w I
~/
...
u~ ~ '
7c~zo ~d~iin~
7
~9z/ /~<e%.,~da~
~~zB S~~~1LrH s~,
~/ .
~a~
'~
1- .$z 00
~'' ~. ~ ` ~ I ~ f
... ~~
...~
..
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTtNC EN(~1NEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
December 23, 1982
Honorable Mayor and
City of North Richl ~
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hill
Re: 3-901 CITY OF NORTN RICHLAND HILLS
SMITHFIELD CRES SANITARY SEWER SYS EM IMPROVEMENTS
e with our instructions, bids were received this date for
In accordanc
ed ro' ct. This roject includes construction of sanitary
the referenc p ~ p
'ne extens i o s re ui red to alleviate sewer back-up problems
sewer l ~ q
eri enced b seve al homeowners along Sm~ thf ~ e1 d Road between
exp Y bulat~ons are
Noneman and Hightow r Dave, The ~nd~v~dual bid to
attached far our r view. As the tabulation indicates, bids were
y
received from five ~5} contractors.
bid submi tt d was from Lewis and Lewis, Inc. , P.O. Box 11501,
The low
Texas 7 109 in the amount of $12,997.55, for a total
Ft. Worth, ~ .
n eri od of 45 calendar days, We d~ scussed the bid w~ th
construct~o
• p ossible•
Mr. Don Lewis and h ~s anxious to begin as soon as p
- n cost estimate of this job was about $7,500. The contractors
Our pre dei sg
i 'ob indicated that the inflated bids were due primarily
who b~ d on th s ~ ,
of unex ect d otenti al problems excavating between houses,
to fear p P rotected•
orki n around trees, ower poles, and fences which had to be p ,
w g p Bch covers
d the re u~ rement of have ng to ~ provi de a mai ntenance bond wh
an q r in the next two
an sewer 1 ine brea s or stoppage which might occu
y the ros ct of bad wea the r
years. Also these contractors noted that p pe
at this time of ea could cause delays that would cost them extra money.
Y
On the basis of the
be awarded to Lewi s
period of 45 calenda
Please call if you
City Council
nd Hills
Texas 76118
bids submitted, we would recommend that this Contract
and Lewis, Inc. , in the amount of $12,997.55, for a
r days.
ave any questions concerning this project.
,~
~~.
r
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ 1 j c
cc: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Ms.
Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Gene ,Riddle, Director of Public Works
Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Lou Spi a el , Director of Finance ~ • 817283.62,1 • METROi267.33Q7
E BANK B~D . • BEDFORD, TEXAS 7602
•
~ ,
i•
i~
K N O O ~ 0 0 0 0
• r F- !-~ O I~ O c~ to rt 0 ~ p
~Z
~ ~
• •
O
i t • V N !h ri d
~ N
LL • •
00
O L
° o0
mu~
p
s
.
' . .
..r •..~ C ttf \
~ ~
~
x .....
x ~ tp O M ~ ~
W ~
-•~
F
e d N
W Q W Q1 (,~ !~ N
_ . O O 0 0 O O
H • L N O O O O t0
OO b
U
F'
~
0
0
O
O
Ld
~ p ~ 00
t~ O ~D to
~ d
1- ~
A ,~
V
C7
~"~
~+~}
OQ ~
~ O
~O
' uvs~. ~
W ~ ~ ~
J ~ a• ~~ X 0 0 O O
OC N f. r+ f~ ~ N ~ 0 ~
W ~O O tG ."~ OC
O a O t
~
~ cn ~-. t~ cp
• y~ O O O O O O ~
' u~ b
~
F-
~n
r.
r•
ao
O
O
~t
~ ~,,,, N M N t0 M N ~
~
a,
Q A ~ Q
~ ~
~ w
~C L C ~ ~
~
J~ ~
01
0~~
O
°
O
0
0
~ tD W
~ V f~
~ N \
LL; ~
r ~ ~
-~ -.
7C [~ 0'1 •
O O O
O
.
J N CC f~ N ~ o• N ~
tt~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~
v y1 .~ 01 O O O to
Z ~0 tC Crf ri ~ N ~ 01 01
w ~ ~ y LA ~O d' CO M ~ ri r•1 ~ d' i
,~ t~ ~ 01 V ~ ~`'~ ra ~ N
Z
0 ~ ~ ~
~~
N
~
~ WOO ~?'
N
CO ~
W ~
4~ O
^ O
~t
O
O 00
tC
0
0
.
•~i • ~ O \ F - ~ M ~ .
0~ t1~ N N tl! t!~
~,,,,~
~ ~N ~ C1 N
''•
Q O ~D ~
..~ a u. ~. co O 4
},,,. •
~ o ~
O O
.
•
.
o~ .. oc
-• ~ _
_
~
z
-~ a. ~
.. ~
W °
W
~
~ •
cET >• ~ .
'
CO V? H
~ Z •
•
W ~
N
•
•
OC >- •
•
W L~ •
'
~
Q ~ ~ ~ '•
u z
W Q ~ ~
'
~
.. ~,
N
~
'
F~ W
OG W
•
~ w •
0
Q ~ ~ •
O O b
~
i•1
ip
C
O •
•
~ ~
W 0 0 W ~
S _ ~
y .. C
~
~
~ •
~ ~
~'
- u o
._ .. ~
O a o ~ ~ ~
.. cc ° ~ o
. z ° o o ~ °' - L ~ ~
•
d C > a O O C~
°~ ro
u >
b
u s.
n~ L
d
3 0l
r-
o ~n
a~ ~i
u X
s-
~+
T
r v X
W X
W 3 G~
~ L ~-- ~d
O OJ
~ ~
C
~
~~ W
O = ~ W M ~ t C
1
~
t
t
f
C
O
~
~
O
Z
~"
C
C
M
M
=
~
>
>>
' ~
F- s41.
H- M ~
O a s.
O c
Q! E
4! ro
+~
L
~ p
W O N 41 4- F~ G
~
aC
d
•r
d
•r
V
U
F-
t
+~
>
~0
L
O
b
N 3
OJ
•• •r •r d d 'C G1 Z7 >>
• v- v1 L. O +~ to i. L
.. o ~ e r r ~ ._ +•~ ~ ~
r' Z OD p m r r~ ~ C
~ ~ -C ~ ro C
~
'7 -
CD ~
~ ~ ,
N x
W ~
Q ~
N ~
V1 b
•
~"'
N C .
v •
.~
0
N ~ ~
W
~ ~. _.
5 0~,.
W
y
,~
O
V
lt! •
1- t3
...... '
~c a
• ~ a
. ..
F-
o
v
H- ~
_ ;
_
x oc
~a
•
A
N u
~ ~ y~ o O 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 O
O
o
= ZCO ~
V O N F'
~ . ~ c ~ o
: ~z ~ F-
N
O
`~ 0
^
G1
w
~,,~ 0
ap
Cp
N 0
e?'
n
w
~ 0
O
~''~
w
M 0
O
w 0
tO
M
~ 0
O
tD
M 0
t~
r•+ 0
O
N 0
O
N O
N
GO
o,
N
~
t 'f `~
., ~ ~
f., x L
~~VWOOD~ ~
W
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
0~.
}Q.. J ~.LJj .~~ ~
J v CC O L~~
~.. Z --+ p t0 ~-+
.c-...ua~,.~ ao F•-~
x~
~ o. N
~-+ O
N N O
O
GD O
O ~ O
N
•
.
. ~~
0 0 }
o ~ _ '
_
00 ~
~
x-
~~
z
•
A JJ
•~. `^~~ • • . f
W W
x .
N
kr ~-
.
C~ V'f }.. • • • • • ~ • • i
OC
w
z
~
~
.
'
'
N .
~ } ~ . •
•
W CY
Q m • •
• •
~ ~
W ~
~
. •
.
' .
U 2
W d
do
"
~
' '
~~
~
.G
.
.. ~
W W ~ E
W
. ,.
}• ~
,~
w
•
Q Q
...
~
~,. '
K
~
~
.~
o
.J
o ~
b
b
~
W
C
Q
~
. •
•
.
.
•
•
•
•
~
. •
x
o . •
}W,,,
°
~ O
-
ct
v
tic
c
O
ao
c
O
s
~
u
u
o
~
s.
~ a~
c
°'
u
~
~
r;
' a
""
~
H
W
D
~ "
v
~
V
°
ac
.Q
o
W ~
~
W
~ fC
ro
u
X
W
v
c
~
~-
~ b
A
u
X
W
u
c
S~.
~
~ d
S.
a~
3
O
N
~n
~
p
a~`i
~
01
t/)
~
c*~
oC
cOn w
,~
o
.C
C
~
:
~
0J o
rn
~
r--
O
b
E
L
40-
t QEED
~i
u
b
~
~
c
O
> •
x
0
b
>
E
oOC
L ~
L
~
3
~
~
~
~
i0
+'
7
0
croi
Li
~
..
•
•• O
W x
~~
?K
W
h !~
C m
~
~ v-
•~
VI
V~
b
r--
V
C
~ v..
•,-
V1
V1
R!
r »
a
L
~
a
t
C
~
•o
L.
R3
'C.7
C
~
+~
t/1
a~
O
b
f..
~
X
W a
~
r-
~
L
{A
Q w
V1
e
O
U
~
b
V1
v
L
b
TJ
C
b
i
N
~
L
b
~
r•
C
b
i
•
KNOWL ON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING E GINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas
December 30, 1982
Mr. Gene Riddle, i rector of Public Works
City of North Ric land Hi 11 s
7301 N.E. Loop 82
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-901, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
SMITHFIELD ACRES SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IP~iPROVEMENTS
Enclosed i s one ~ ~ copy of the Contract for the referenced project
which has been ex cuted by the Contractor, Lewis & Lewis, Inc.
P1 ease have the M yor sign the agreement and the City Secretary attest
on page SF-2, and then return the Contract to our office for binding in
the Contract Docu ents and for distribution.
Also enclosed is copy of Change Order No. 1 to this Contract which
reduces the total Contract amount from $12,997.55 to $10,834.91. You
may wish to have his change order ratified by Counci 1 along with formal
confirmation of C ntract award to Lewis and Lewis, Inc.
P1 ease call i f we can be of further service i n this regard.
t/v" r "w "~ ~ v ~
ICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
cc: Mr. Rodger N Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Br nstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Ms. Lou Spie el, Director of Finance
550 FIRST STATE BANK
. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 617/283.6211 • METRO/267-3367
t
.~
JECT:
U
mithfield Acres
.
anitary sewer im rovemen n
C~°. /
DATE: 1-4-83
ts
,~
DEPARTMENT: Utility. ~,
RGROUND:
BAC
This~is the sm
11 sewer 'ob authorized
for bids. If ou a ov
bid of
Lewis & Lewis Iric.
for $12,997.55 we would ,.
recommend that ou a
change .order ~~1 which to ers the dollar amount to 10,834 91- Thi low
amount
deletes some of t ,.
e line that is not re uired to elim'ri
'on the existing line.
1
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED Approve/disauprove the bid and than a order ~~1 of
Lewis & Lewis~Inc.
BUDGETED ITF1~i: YES
~~CCOUNT NUMBER: Utility Bo NO X
d Funds '
rr-fir.-~r~-
r~--~r.~-.u---~-~w~wr C
--rM~wu--mow- rte- -ter-~-
I'
I•
SF-2
I
..
,,
~~.
i~
i~
and all extra work in connection therewith, under the terms as stated in the General Conditions
of the Agreement and at his (or their) own proper cost and expense to furnish all the materials,
supplies, machinery, equipment, tools, superintendence, labor, insurance, and other accessories
and services necessary to complete the said construction, in accordance with the conditions and
prices stated in the Proposal attached hereto, and in accordance with the Notice to Contractors;
General and Special Conditions of Agreement, Plans and other drawings and printed or written
explanatory matter thereof, and the Specifications and addenda therefor, as prepared by._____.
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.,~CONSULTING ENGINEERS
hei•eit~ entitled the ENGINEER, each of which has been ide»tified by the CONTRACTOR And
the ENGINEER, together with the CONTRACTOR'S written Proposal, the General Conditions
~,f the A~;reem~nt, and the Performance and Payment Bonds hereto Kttached; all of which are made
a Hart hereof and collectively evidence and constitute the entire contract.
SECTION 1.4
STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT
As Adopted By
THE TEkAS SECTION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS
October 7,1971
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered. into this day of______. ~~ ~ ~,
' ~ A. D.19. _ b and between
~Y
~. THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ I
of the Count of TARRANT gnd State of Texas, acting through
Y
THE MAYOR
. ~ .. thereunto duly authorized eo ~ to do,
Part of the -First Part hereinafter terms NER and L EW I S & L EW I S , I N C .
y d OW ,
-- - - --
of the City of .FORT WORTH Count of TARRANT
Y
and State of TEXAS part of the Second Part hereinafter termed
Y
CONTRACTOR. .
WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the payments and agreements herein-
after mentioned, to be made and performed by the Party of the First Part (OWNER), and under
the conditions expressed in the bond bearing even date herewith, the said Party ,of the Second
Part (CONTRACTOR), hereby agrees with the said Party of the First Part (OWNERS to
. commence and complete the construction of certain improvements described as follows;
CONSTRUCT SMITHFIELD ACRES SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IP~PROVEMENTS
SF-1
s
~ r
.~
~~ K- E- F N0. 3-901
CHANGE ORDER NO 1 TO THE CONTRACT
. WN ICH WAS DATED
. _ ~ ~ lg
Between THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .
(OWNER}
And LEWIS AND LEWIS, INC.
~ CONTRACTOR}
For SMITNFIELD ACRES SANITAR
Y SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
•
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the Genera] Conditions of
this Chan a .the Contract,
g Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authorlt to
y change
the work of the
Project as follows:
.Delete the following quantities from the Contract;
ITEM
' N0.
DESCRIPTION UNIT DELETE
UNIT PRICE UANTITY
COST
REDUCTION
__ ______
1. Excavation 0' -6'
. L.F. $ 3.95 200
$ 790
00
3.. 6-inch PVC Pipe
. L.F. 5.70 204 .
1
140.OD
4. -
4 ~ nch Se rv ~ ce P~ pe L.F. 9.40 75 ,
705
00
7. Ash Pa
p . vement Replacement S. F. 2.68 448 .
1
200
64
8. Saw Cuts L.F. 2.Z5 I12 ,
.
252
00
10. Cleanout EACH 125.00 1 .
125.00
. TOTAL CONTRACT REDUCTION = $4,212.64
PLUS EXTRA COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR
FOR REDUCTION IN CONTRAC
OS~
~Z
d
T AMOUNT = i
,
a
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT = $12,997.55
. REVISED CONTRACT =
AMOUNT ~ 7Q ~3
~ ~.`~~
Contract completion time shall be
(decreased by __ 5___ days} because of this chap e.
9 ""
CONTRA DR`S OFFE OF PROPOSED CHANGE:
(Witness) or (Attest):
- , ~~~. Date: /Z - ~~
ENGINE S ECOMMEiJDAT I ON OF ACC TANCE
y• ~ Date:
~~-- z9
OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE
By
(Witness) or (Attest):
i9SZ-
~., 19
~.
~.
t
. .,
. .. y ',
~•
~~.~gJECT: Purchase of six (6) ~l~3rkE~d patrol cars _
- -- -- --
DEPr.R i ~~ EfrT: Po1~ce _~---- ____ __ _- ___ ___ - __ _ . _-_ - _____ -_-_ ____ ____~ ____.~_~__,_._ _____.
,.
6A.Ct:GR ' Sr' On Tuesday October 5, 1982, the City of_Nor~h Richland Hills opened ~~
OJ D . ____ ---- __-__ - _ -------- -----_
five (5) sealed bids from vendors seeking to sell marked patrol units to this city.
Twenty vendors were requested to bid.
Those choosin to bid were: Meador Chrysler Plymouth ($9014 ~a); Mid-Cities Chrysler
-__ --- - _--___.-_ _ _---g------ ---------- _ _------- ------- -----~ ------._ ____ ------_-_ ----------------- -----__- ._
P1 mouth ($9113.07 ea); Hudiburg Chevrolet, Inc. ($10,064 ea); Charlie Hillard Fordy~~
y _ _____ _
($10 088 ea) and Sam Lingard Ford, Inc. ($10,381.06 ea).
The loaf bid, from Meador Chrysler Plymouth, provides six'(~6) 1983 _Plymouth Gran- -
Fur 4 door sedans in compliance with published specifications at $9,014.00 per unit
y
for a total capital expenditure of $54,084.00. The operating budget for FY`-82-83
provided funds in account number 80-04-6600 for the purchase of six (6) replacement _' -
vehicles for the Uniformed Bureau of the Police Department. Those vehicles to be
replaced are numbers 2251, 2255, 2257, 2261, 2265, and 2214. Dealer assures that - ,-
these vehicles will arrive within 60-90 days from bid approval.
CITY C0~"1C1L ~CT101 ~~QUIP~~J: Request approval of Meador Chrysler Plymouths _-
1612 So. University Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76107 as the low bidder for six (b) ._
1983 marked patrol cars for the $54,084.00 total bid price.
ELJ~LIED 17~t~: YES x t;C
~CC0J~7 f~'J:~:~EP,: 80-04-6600
~ /F
..
,•
I
. ~
••!
1
,~
•t z
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BID QUOTATION FORAi
Bids submitted to the City of North Richland Hills for the below listed items shall
be submitted on this form in a sealed envelope addressed to the City Secretary of
North Richland Hills, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, Fort ,Worth, Texas 76118. Bids shall be
received not later than October 5, 1982 at which time all bids shall be publicly
opened and read aloud.
The front of the envelope shall have the following information printed or typed in
the lower left corner:
"BID QUOTATION ENCLOSED"
ITEM Police Package 4 door sedans t6)
OPENING HOUR AND DATE: October 5, 1982
~n.nn e M
The prices quoted on the Bid Quotation Form are "firm" and "real" prices. The City
of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to re-
advertise subject to notification.
THE PRICES QUOTED HEREIN AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
• HILLS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE OR BE HELD TO CONSTITUTE AN ORDER.
QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION OF ITEM BID ON PRICE TOTAL BID
6 OLICE PK
4 DOOR 1983 PLYMOUTH GRAN FURY 4 DOOR
SEDAN. $9014.0 $54,084.00
DATE: 10-1-83 TERMS OF BID: NET IN FULL 15 DAYS FROM DATE OF
DELIVERY...
BIDDER NAME : MEADOR CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC .
ADDRESS: 1612 S0. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, FT. WORTH, TEXAS 76107
TITLE OF COMPANY OFFICER: GENERAL MANAGER
• SIGNATURE: X lj(/
ti
•~• ~
~~
1
ATTEN : SEE ~ NOTE ,
SCOPE:
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
SPECIFICATION FOR SIX (b)
SPECIAL PURPOSE - POLICE PACKAGE
AUTOMOBILES
ITEM 4, AND ITEM 5a.
The Specifications describe special purpose automobiles to be used in
pursuit applications by the Patrol Division of the North Richland Hills
Police Department. These specifications describe full-size {ll2 inch
minimum wheelbase) vehicles.
GENERAL:
The following specifications shall apply to all vehicles:
All units are to be deluxe model police package equipped vehicles, and
are to be furnished with standard equipment and factory installed
accessories as listed in manufacturer's printed literature for the models
bid.
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR BIDDING
I. Bid on the form provided.
2. A statement must be attached that the bidder has parts in stock for the above
mentioned equipment, or has a source of supply where parts can be obtained,
within a two {2) day period, including week-ends.
3. Any piece of equipment not meeting specifications will not be accepted and
will be returned, at that time, by the vendor's representative, to the vendor,
and will be returned to the City of North Richland Hills when discrepancies
have been altered, at no cost to the City of North Richland Hills.
4. Bids will be for six, full size, 1983 model, four-door, police package, sedans
manufactured in the United States . NOTE : ALL PLYMOUTH VEHICLES BUILT ON
THE NORTH AMERICAN CONTINENT...
5. .Delivery:
A. Quantities and delivery dates, as follows:
City of North Richland Hills. Six vehicles as soon as possible, follow-
ing the bid selection . NOTE : DELIVERY 60-90 DAYS FROM DATE OF ORDER
~TO THE FACTORY...
6. Bids will be received in the office of the City Secretary of North Richland
Hills until 10:00 A.M., October 5, 1981, and opened at that time.
7. Bids will be awarded, and payment will be made by the City of North Richland
Hills, upon final approval by purchaser.
8. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to refuse any, and all bids.
~ ~
.. ~
I. ENGINE
A. Engine to be police heavy-duty type, To have
special heavy -duty crankshaft and valve train
components in addition to other special~compo-
nents designed for sustained high speed pursuit
applications.
B. Engine to have minimum rating of 300 cubic inch
displacement. A four barrel carburator required.
C, In-line fuel filter.
D. Cooling system.
1. Radiator to be heavy-duty with capacity to
be maximum offered by manufacturer.
TH
2. System to include fan shroud, 5 or 7 blade DR
fan and slip clutch. SH
3. System to be equipped with sealed coolant
recovery system. STAND
. 4. Hea Dut -Factor air conditionin SERVI
~ y y g CONDI
E. AlI hose clamps on the engine cooling and vehicle
cooling system to be of the positive closure type
to hold the hoses securely in position under high
pressure and rough road conditions. The clamp
shall consist of a rustproof steel band .having
slots and a worm screw drive to permit tightening
and reuse.
F. Dual exhaust (preferred)
II. BODY
A. To be four-door sedan.
B. Color: top and supporting posts to be tan with
all other exterior painted surfaces to be dark
brown in color.
C. Armrests on all doors.
D. To have automatic pop-out cigar lighter.
E. To have external chrome moldings that are standard
equipment on deluxe model vehicles. To have vinyl
inserted body side moldings factory installed.
F. Covering for luggage compartment to be vinyl or
fiber type mat.
In Alternate
Compliance Bid
X
X
ENGINE BID
318 cid.V8
4/BBL CA .
X
X
X
~RMO-TORQ
IVE FAN---
~OUDED . j ~ c ~~''
X
~RD POLICE
~E DUTY AI
X
SINGLE EXI:
BID ON THE
VEHICLES.
DUAL EXH .
N/A FROM 1~
X
X
X
X EXECP ION ON VINE
MOLDING--V NYL INSERTF
MOLDING N/ FROM MFG.
VINYL MOLD NG INSTALLf
BODY PERMANENTLY.
SE
FG
'L
~D
D
~T
NOTE: FOR SPECIFICATION (F) COMPLIES
G. To have dual horns.
H. To have factory installed air conditioner, heater
and defroster.
I. To have factory installed push-botton AM broadcast
radio.
~. To have inside mounted rearview mirror as follows:
1. To be suspended from above, free of vibration
and mounted at a height and position to provide
a combination of best rear and forward vision.
2. To be adjustable for day and night driving.
3. To be glareproof and free of optical distortion.
K. To have remote controlled outside rearview mirror on
left side, one stationary convex mirror on right side.
L. To have jack, handle, and lug wrench.
M. Windshield and all windows to be tinted.
N. To have heavy-duty, intermittent type variable
speed windshield wipers . NOTE
0. Floor covering must be carpet with vinyl inset. VINE
P . Front seats must be bucket type . EXCEPTION : BUCKF
60/4C
Q. Interior trim, including seat covering, to be cloth
and vinyl in color to match exterior.
R. Certified speedometer as offered in Police Equipment
Package to be furnished.
S. Spotlight - Unity No. 225 (or equal), 6-inch (15.24 cm;
clear lens, 12-volt; for current model automobile. To
be mounted_ on left side windshield post or quarter
panel. Spotlight and outside rearview mirror must not
conflict.
T. Complete under-coating of undercarriage.
U. Factory Power Steering.
V. Remote control trunk release within driver's reach.
W. Trunk lamp.
X. Under hood lamp.
Y, Extra dome lamp forward mounted.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
DUAL REMOTE OUTSIDE
MIRRORS
X BID ON VEHICL]
X
X
WIPERS
L INSET ST
AT DUTY BID.
RIVERS SIl
T SEATS i~/ FROM MFG .
INDIVIDUA
X SEATS BID
X
X~
X
X
X
X
X
~.
)E.
\ ~ ,~
`~
~t
III.
Z. Tilt-steering wheel.
CHASSIS
A. Full wheel covers to be supplied.
B. Transmission to be automatic, three-speed, heavy-
duty type .
C. Heavy duty transmission cooler.
D. To have heavy-duty police front and rear brakes
with H.D, disc brakes on.front. Power brake unit
to be extra heavy-duty with dual master cylinder
and equipped with warning system with light in
instrument panel.
E. To have heavy-duty police front and rear springs,
shock absorbers, and front and rear suspension.
F. To have anti-sway bar on front of chassis.
G. To have anti-sway bar on rear of chassis if rear
suspension is equipped with coil springs.
H. To be equipped with five (57 GR10-15B police special C
high speed textile cord radial black sidewall tires
(steel not acceptable) . P
I . Rim size to be 6.5 X 15 inches . NOTE : F
IV. ELECTF.ICAL SYSTEM
A. Alternator to be nominal 12-volt, minimum 80 ampere,
with "built-in" silicone rectifiers and transist-
orized regulator. Minimum output at engine idle to
be 40 amperes as measured by SAE recommended method.
B. Alternator charging circuit must have fusible link
in wiring hazness, or equal safety device.
C. Battery to be nominal 12-volt 80 ampere hour or 4,000
watts minimum. NOTE: AMP HR. FIGURES N/A. BATT.
HEAVE
D. To have special suppressor spark plug wiring and
wiring mounting bracket.
E. Ignition coil must be by-passed to ground with at
least .5 MFD 100-volt capacitor.
F. Ignition switch must have accessory position opposite
ignition position.
IC;
rep
B.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OTE : STAN DA
ERTIFIED P2 SIZE POL
5 ?OR15 ti
OODYEAR BL
IAS POLICE
IM SIZE 7.0 STREAK FA
PEC. TIRES
X 15 JJ
OTE: ALT. B D 117 AMP.
97 AMP
X MINIMUM.
BID 500 CC
DUTY LONG
X 0 F...
IFE BATT .
X
X
~-
V.
G. "Single Key" fleet keying.
H. Hood to have "radio bounding" to body.
I. Shall be equipped with full instrumentation
including oil pressure, temperature, ammeter,
and f ue 1 gauges .
FULL SIZE VEHICLES
A. Wheelbase - 112 inches minimum. NOTE : WHEELBASE BII
B . Overa 11 Length - 212.1 inches minimum. NOTE : EXCEPT?
C. Overall Width - 7b.0 inches minimum. NOTE: .EXCEPT. 0~
D. Wheel Tread, Front - 61.8 inches minimum. NOTE:EXCEP7
E . Whee 1 Tread, Rear - b0.8 inches minimum. NOTE : EXCEPT
BASE BID
X
X
X
~ 112.7 INC S.
ON-OVERALL NGTH 205.
'ERALL WIDTH 74.2".
'. FRONT T 60.0".
' . REAR T ~ 5 9 5 "
7"
Since 1957 Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile Chrysler-Plymouth 1101 West Seventh
Fort Worth, Texas 76102-3592
817/332.1135, Metro 429-3039
ChrysleFPlymouth
1612 S. University
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
8171336-1612
/o-6-a~
~~ti~i~n?a I° ~/~rnac. ~i%~uaw~~B.~- Y3-o-vs
~~~-~~~~~~~--yam .~~O~G~:~~
~,~kr ~i~,p~wr~ 07 9o~s!oo~r~.
r
~/
~~
~C~`~
~ ~ ~
F~~ ~/'7ai/a~ c.
/7a~,- C~i~s/, ~~„ou~~
~ , 1
1
I ~
''r
.~
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BID QUOTATION FORM
Bids submitted to the City of North Richland Hills for the below listed items shall
be submitted on this. form in a sealed envelope addressed to the City Secretar of
Y
North Richland Hills, 1301 N.E. Loop 820, Fort Worth, Texas 1b118. Bids shall be
received not later than October 5, 1982 at which time all bids shall be publicly
opened and read aloud.
The front of the envelope shall have the following information printed or typed in
the Iower left corner:
"BID QUOTATION ENCLOSED"
ITEM Police Package 4 door sedans (6}
OPENING HOUR AND DATE: October 5, 1982
~~~nn a M
The prices quoted on the Bid Quotation Form are "firm" and "real" prices. The City
of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to re-
advertise subject to notification.
THE PRICES QUOTED HEREIN AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE OR BE HELD TO CONSTITUTE AN ORDER.
QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION OF ITEM BID ON PRICE TOTAL BID
l 983 P~cyMOw~"f! ~a~az~ y,~~c.,--
s~a.~.~ ~ << c ~ uN~rs 9//.3 ~7
E~ S51 67~ S~.Z
I
DATE: ~0' jl'~'~~Z, TERMS OF BID: ~,~y,,~E,,Ta.a v~G/!/t-1~/'
BIDDER NAME : ~J7/ d ~ C / T~ Cr!'n ~/,S ~E~- /~i~j~f,•~Oc*,?/j~,
ADDRESS : ~ya~ ~ /I~a /.lJiiTSD.J ,~~~ /~/~-/•rJ~~T~/ / ~'/~'_S 'f ~O//
TITLE OF COMPANY OFFICER: ~~~~ ~Jjy,~,y~_/L,
• SIGNATURE: ~ ~`
~ o
~/~ G r vc~~--~ ~ v - CI o ~/,~/S $i~T~ /Z~Ge~ ~,~ r cf ~
t t
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
__ SPECIFICATION FOR SIX (6)
SPECIAL PURPOSE - POLICE PACKAGE
AUTOMOBILES
SCOPE:
The Specifications describe special purpose automobiles to be used in
pursuit applications by the Patrol Division of the North Richland Hills
Police Department. These specifications describe full-size (112 inch
minimum wheelbase} vehicles,
GENERAL:
The following specifications shall apply to all vehicles:
All units are to be deluxe model police package equipped vehicles, and
are to be furnished with standard equipment and factory installed
accessories as listed in manufacturer's printed literature for the models
bid,
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR BIDDING
1. Bid on the form provided.
2. A statement must be attached that the bidder has parts in stock for the above
mentioned equipment, or has a source of supply where parts can be obtained,
within a two (2} day period, including week-ends.
3. Any piece of equipment not meeting specifications will not be accepted and
will be returned, at that time, by the vendor's representative, to the vendor,
and will be returned to the City of North Richland Hills when discrepancies
have been altered, at no cost to the City of North Richland Hills.
4. Bids will be for six, full size, 1983 model, four-door, police package, sedans
manufactured in the United States.
5. Delivery:
A. Quantities and delivery dates, as follows:
City of North Richland Hills. Six vehicles as soon as possible, follow-
ing the bid selection.
b. Bids will be received in the office of the City Secretary of North Richland
Hills until 10:00 A.M., October 5, 1981, and opened at that time.
1. Bids will be awarded, and payment will be made by the City of North Richland
HiIIs, upon final approval by purchaser.
8. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to refuse any, and alI bids.
L. J
• _ I. ENGINE
A. Engine to be police heavy-duty type. To have
special heavy-duty crankshaft and valve train
components in addition to other special.compo-
nents designed for sustained high speed pursuit
applications.
B. Engine to have minimum rating of 300 cubic inch
displacement. A four barrel carburator required.
C. In-line fuel filter.
D. Cooling system.
1. Radiator to be heavy-duty with capacity to
be maximum offered by manufacturer.
2. System to include fan shroud, 5 or 1 blade
fan and slip clutch.
3. System to be equipped with sealed coolant
' recovery system.
4. Heavy Duty - Factory air condition' .
f ~0~~
E. All hose clamps on the engine cooling and vehicle
cooling system to be of the positive closure type
to hold the hoses securely in position under high
pressure and rough road conditions. The clamp
shall consist of a rustproof steel band having
slots and a w orm screw drive to permit tightening
and reuse.
F. Dual exhaust (preferred}
II. BODY
A. To be four-door sedan.
B. Color: top and supporting posts to be tan with
all other exterior painted surfaces to be dark
brown in color. ,~igQEC ~j~'kl•~ ~0%/~^~`'
cQys T~-c Bci ~ ~
C. Armrests on all doors.
D. To have automatic pop-out cigar lighter.
' E. To have external chrome moldings that are standard
equipment on deluxe model vehicles. To have vinyl
inserted body side moldings factory installed.
F. Covering for luggage compartment to be vinyl or
fiber type mat.
In Alternate
Compliance Bid
~s • I ~
S
~S
~~
r
~~
s,~~c.~~
c~
~S
S
f
t~~
1
M
G. To have dual horns. ,~
H. To have factory installed air conditioner, heater
and defroster.
I. To have factory installed push-botton AM broadcast ~r
radio.
J. To have inside mounted rearview mirror as follows:
1. To be suspended from above, free of vibration I
and mounted at a height and position to provide
a combination of best rear and forward vision.
2. To be adjustable for day and night driving.
3. To be glareproof and free of optical distortion.
K, To have remote controlled outside rearview mirror on ~f
left side, one stationary convex mirror, on right side.
L. To have jack, handle, and lug wrench. ~S
M. Windshield and alI windows to be tinted.
N. To have heavy-duty, intermittent type variable ~
speed windshield wipers.
0. Floor coverin must be car et with vin l inset.
8 P Y 5 ~~~ f~v~`~(.~~C~
P. Front seats must be bucket type. a ~~ ~~~%~
Q. Interior trim, including seat covering, to be cloth
and vinyl in color to match exterior.
R. Certified speedometer as offered in Police Equipment ~ ~r S
Package to be furnished.
R
S. Spotlight - Unity No. 225 (or equal), 6-inch (15.24 cm) ~'~S
clear Tens, 12-volt; for current model automobile. To
be mounted._ on left side windshield post or quarter
panel. Spotlight and outside rearview mirror must not
conflict.
T. Complete under-coating of undercarriage. ~_,S
U. Factory Power Steering. ~~
V. Remote control trunk release within driver's reach. ~-
W, Trunk lamp. ~-S
X. Under hood lamp. S
Y. Extra dome lamp forward mounted.
~t
,1 ,.
^ •,
4
,• .
Z. Tilt-steering wheel.
III. CHASSIS
A. Full wheel covers to be supplied.
B. Transmission to be automatic, three-speed, heavy-
duty type.
C. Heavy duty transmission cooler.
P. To have heavy-duty police front and rear brakes
with H.D. disc brakes on.front. Power brake unit
to be extra heavy-duty with dual master cylinder
and equipped with warning system with light in
instrument panel.
E. To have heavy-duty police front and rear springs,
shock absorbers, and front and rear suspension.
F. To have anti-sway bar on front of chassis.
G. To have anti-sway bar on rear of chassis if rear
suspension is equipped with coil springs.
H. To be equipped with five (5) GR70-1bB police special
high speed textile cord radial black sidewall tires
(steel not acceptable) .
I. Rim size to be b.5 X 15 inches.
IV. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
A. Alternator to be nominal 12-volt, minimum 80 ampere,
with "built-in" silicone rectifiers and transist-
orized regulator. Minimum output at engine idle to
be 40 amperes as measured by SAE recommended method.
B. Alternator charging circuit must have fusible link
in wiring hazness, or equal safety device.
C. Battery to be nominal 12-volt 80 ampere hour or 4,000
watts minimum.
D. To have special suppressor spark plug wiring and
wiring mounting bracket.
E. Ignition coil must be by-passed to ground with at
least .5 MFD 100-volt capacitor.
F. Ignition switch must have accessory position opposite
. .
ignition position. .
1
~.-
L~~
~-S
~~"S
1 '
~,Z1 72~1L~s~
~~,~~ d
~~
~-S
~~ ~~
~5
f
.~
t
~
~ ,"
G. "Single Key" fleet keying.
N. Hood to have "radio bounding" to body.
. I. Shall be equipped with full instrumentation
including oil pressure, temperature, ammeter,
and f ue 1 gauges ,
V. FULL SIZE VEHICLES
.,
A. Wheelbase - 112 inches minimum.
B. Overall Length - 212.1 inches minimum.
C. Overall Width - 76.0 inches minimum.
D. Wheel Tread, Front - 61.8 inches minimum.
t" ~
` C~
~5
'.
d .
~~~o~
a~Q
E. Wheel Tread, Rear - 60.8 inches minimum.
BASE BI D
07
9~i3
~B~G~ ~~J-CtT Cf~~t/SGEn /~a<j~i~OK~~ /'~/~5 ~~nTs ~gv~~Lr~/3~~
gnu ~_ j%,Z ~ . ~ .'3 a -rb y-; -~~ acs fl w~ t~~/~ ~--,~ E
~l~^~tilc,. ~~ni3j~~~ ~.o e~r~~- i,~ c~nnouTc~-~ 7"~'~-~5
°r'"~'lLl g'eo To ~,'3v'
.~
• ~,
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BID QUOTATION FORM
Bids submitted to the City of North Richland Hills for the below listed items shall
be submitted on this form in a sealed envelope addressed to the City Secretary of
North Richland Hills, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, Fort Worth, Texas 76118. Bids shall be
received not later than October 5, 1982 at which time all bids shall be publicly
opened and read aloud.
The front of the envelope shall have the following information printed or typed in
the lower left corner:
"BID QUOTATION ENCLOSED"
ITEM Police Package 4 door sedans (6}
_______
OPENING HOUR AND DATE: October 5, 1982
1 n.-nn n ~r
a
The prices quoted on the Bid Quotation Form are "firm" and "real" prices. The City
of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to re-
advertise subject to notification.
THE PRICES QUOTED HEREIN AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE OR BE HELD TO CONSTITUTE AN ORDER.
QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION OF ITEM BID ON PRICE TOTAL BID
~ 1983 Chevrolet I~pala Police
Car $I0,064. 0
60,384.00
DATE : 9 _~4 _8z TERMS OF BiD: r~et Due Z 5 Days
BIDDER NAME: Hudit~ur~ Chevrolet, Inc.
ADDRESS : 7709 Grapevine t~~ih~~ay, Ft. ~~y girth, Texas 16118
_ _~
TITLE OF COMPANY OFFICER:
Fleet Sales F.e~resen~ative
,_ _ ~ ,
SIGNATURE: , ~ ~~r'
1 '
I. ENGINE
A. Engine to be police heavy-duty type. To have
special heavy-duty crankshaft and valve train
• components in addition to other special~compo-
nents designed for sustained high speed pursuit
applications.
B. Engine to have minimum rating of 300 cubic inch
displacement. A four barrel carburator required.
C. In-line fuel filter.
D. Cooling system.
1. Radiator to be heavy-duty with capacity to
be maximum offered by manufacturer.
2. System to include fan shroud, 5 or 1 blade
fan and slip clutch.
3. System to be equipped with sealed coolant
recovery system,
4. Heavy Duty - Factory air conditioning.
E. All hose clamps on the engine cooling and vehicle
cooling system to be of the positive closure type
to hold the hoses securely in position under high
pressure and rough road conditions. The clamp
shall consist of a rustproof steel band .having
slots and a worm screw drive to permit tightening
and reuse.
F. Dual exhaust {preferred)
II. BODY
A. To be four-door sedan.
B. Color: top and supporting posts to be tan with
all other exterior painted surfaces to be dark
brown in color.
C. Armrests on all doors.
D. To have automatic pop-out cigar lighter.
E. To have external chrome moldings that are standard
equipment on deluxe model vehicles. To have vinyl
inserted body side moldings factory installed.
F. Covering for luggage compartment to be vinyl or
fiber type mat.
In
Compliance
Alternate
Bid
J
J
f~lL_.
~~~
v
t~~.
v
G. To have dual horns.
H. To have factory installed air conditioner, heater
and defroster.
I. To have factory installed push-botton AM broadcast
radio.
J. To have inside mounted rearview mirror as follows:
1. To be suspended from above, free of vibration
and mounted at a height and position to provide
a combination of best rear and forward vision.
2. To be adjustable for day and night driving.
3. To be glareproof and free of optical distortion.
K. To have remote controlled outside rearview mirror on
left side, one stationary convex mirror on right side.
L. To have jack, handle, and lug wrench.
M. Windshield and all windows to be tinted.
N. To have heavy-duty, intermittent type variable
speed windshield wipers .
o. Floor covering must be carpet with vinyl inset.
P. Front seats must be bucket type.
Q. Interior trim, including seat covering, to be cloth
and vinyl in color to match exterior.
R. Certified speedometer as offered in Police Equipment
Package to be furnished.
S. Spotlight - Unity No. 225 (or equal), b-inch (15.24 cm
clear lens, 12-volt; for current IDodel automobile. To
be mounted . on le f t s ide windshield pos t or quarter
panel. Spotlight and outside rearview mirror must not
conflict.
T. Complete under-coating of undercarriage.
U. Factory Power Steering.
v. Remote control trunk release within driver's reach.
W. Trunk ,lamp.
X. Under hood Lamp.
Y. Extra dome lamp forward mounted.
f
J _._
i µ
v
~j
/ ~ r
1
` ' ~
III.
Z, Tilt-steering wheel.
CHASSIS
A. Full wheel covers to be supplied.
B. Transmission to be automatic, three-speed, heavy-
duty type.
C. Heavy duty transmission cooler.
D. To have heavy-duty police front and rear brakes
with H.D, disc brakes on.front. Power brake unit
to be extra heavy-duty with dual master cylinder
and equipped with warning system with light in
instrument panel.
E. To have heavy-duty police front and rear springs,
shock absorbers, and front and rear suspension.
F. To have anti-sway bar on front of chassis.
G. To have anti-sway bar on rear of chassis if rear
suspension is equipped with coil springs.
H. To be equipped with five CS) GR7o-1+SB police special
high speed textile cord radial black sidewall tires
steel not acceptable).
I. Rim size to be 6.5 X 15 inches.
IV, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
A. Alternator to be nominal 12-volt, minimum 80 ampere,
with "built-in" silicone rectifiers and transist- ~~
orized re ulator. Minimum out ut at en ine idle to -~
g P g
be 40 amperes as measured by SAE recommended method.~~~
B. Alternator charging circuit must have fusible link
in wiring hazness, or equal safety device.
C. Battery to be nominal 12-volt 80 ampere hour or 4,000
..
watts minimum.
D. To have special suppressor spark plug wiring and
wiring mounting bracket.
E. Ignition coil must be by-passed to ground with at
least .5 MFD 100-volt capacitor.
F. Ignition switch must have accessory position opposite
ignition position.
S ~r
.~
~ Pz~ s/o~
"ors`
~~7v.~k PHr
~~.~4~ sg~•~
G. "Single Key" fleet keying.
H. Hood to have "radio bounding" to body.
. I. Shall be equipped with full instrumentation
including oil pressure, temperature, ammeter,
and f ue 1 gauges .
V. FULL SIZE VEHICLES
A. Wheelbase - 112 inches minimum.
B. Overall Length - 212.1 inches minimum.
C. Overall Width - 7b.0 inches minimum.
D. Wheel Tread, Frotit - 61.8 inches minimum.
E. Wheel Tread, Rear - 60.8 inches minimum.
BASE BID $ Z ~ ~ O6L} ~ QQ
u
1
f
t
• ~
r ~
a
. ,
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BID QUOTATION FORM
Bids submitted to the City of North Richland Hills for the below listed items shall
be submitted on this form in a sealed envelope addressed to the City Secretary of
North Richland Hills, 1301 N.E. Loop 820, Fort Worth, Texas~16118. Bids shall be
received not later than October 5, 1982 at which time all bids shall be publicly
opened and read aloud.
The front of, the envelope. shall have the following information printed or typed in
the lower l,e'f t corner:
"BID QUOTATION ENCLOSED"
ITEM Police Package 4 door sedans (6)
OPENING HOUR AND DATE: October 5, 19$2
10:00 A.M.
The prices quoted on the Bid Quotation Form are "firm" and "real" prices. The Cit
Y
of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to re-
advertise subject to notification.
THE PRICES QUOTED HEREIN AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
. HILLS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE OR BE HELD TO CONSTITUTE AN ORDER.
QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION OF ITEM BID ON PRICE TOTAL BID
~ G o S1 ~
e D rt ^~
.r_:. ~
DATE: f v - ~~ ~ ~ TERMS OF BID: ~(f 2r ~ D ,~ ~G~S
BIDDER NAME: C~ ~ ~/'~I ~ /~"/~~~~I~ ~~Z~
~ /"'
AnD xE s s : ~ ' f z~ ~ - .S G.s n.r ~ v ~ e-~S / ~j f `~ ~v ~r7 ~~ '7'~'~- ~(, J d~
TITLE OF COMPANY OFFICER:
• SIGNATURE:
eel
c
('~/
~o~
s ~~
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
• SPECIFICATION FOR SIX (6)
SPECIAL PURPOSE - POLICE PACKAGE
AUTOMOBILES
SCOPE:
The Specifications describe special purpose automobiles to be used in
pursuit applications by the Patrol Division of the North Richland Hills
Police Department. These specifications describe full-size (112 inch
minimum wheelbase) vehicles,
GENERAL:
The following specifications shall apply to all vehicles:
All units are to be deluxe model police package equipped vehicles, and
are to be furnished with standard equipment and factory installed
accessories as .listed in manufacturer's printed literature for the models
bid.
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR BIDDING
1. Bid on the form provided.
2. A statement must be attached that the bidder has parts in stock for the above
mentioned equipment, or has a source of supply where parts can be obtained,
within a two (2) day period, including week-ends.
3. Any piece of equipment not meeting specifications will not be accepted and
will be returned, at that time, by the vendor's representative, to the vendor,
and will be returned to the City of North Richland Hills when discrepancies
have been altered, at no cost to the City of North Richland Hills.
.-
4. Bids will be for six, full size, 1983 model, four-door, police package, sedans
manufactured in the United States.
5. Delivery:
A. Quantities and delivery dates, as follows:
City of North Richland Hills. Six vehicles as soon as possible, follow-
ing the bid selection.
b. Bids will be received in the office of the City Secretary of North Richland
Hills until 10:00 A.M., October 5, 1982, and opened at that time,
7. Bids will be awarded, and payment will be made by the City of North Richland
Hills, upon final approval by purchaser.
8. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to refuse any, and all bids.
r~
L
I. ENGINE
A. Engine to be police heavy-duty type. To have
special heavy-duty crankshaft and valve train
• components in addition to other special~compo-
nents designed for sustained high speed pursuit
applications.
B. Engine to have minimum rating of 300 cubic inch
displacement. A four barrel carburator required.
C. In-line fuel filter.
D. Cooling system.
1. Radiator to be heavy-duty with capacity to
be maximum offered by manufacturer.
2. System to include fan shroud, 5 or 1 blade
fan and slip clutch.
3. System to be equipped with sealed coolant
recovery system.
4. Heavy Duty - Factory air conditioning.
E. AlI hose clamps on the engine cooling and vehicle
cooling system to be of the positive closure type
to hold the hoses securely in position under high
pressure and rough road conditions. The clamp
shall consist of a rustproof steel band .having
slots and a worm screw drive to permit tightening
and reuse.
F. Dual exhaust (preferred)
I I . BODY
A. To be four-door sedan.
B. Color: top and supporting posts to be tan with
all other exterior painted surfaces to be dark
brown in color.
C. Armrests on all doors.
D. To have automatic pop-out cigar lighter.
E. To have external chrome moldings that are standard
equipment on deluxe model vehicles. To have vinyl
inserte' body side moldings factory installed.
F. Covering for luggage compartment to be vinyl or
fiber type mat.
In
Compliance
c~
v
d
~/
Alternate
Bid
vj~ CSG ~ a,s
u /AG
t '~ 1
/v ~ ~ ~~Z~J,~I
G. To have dual horns. ~
___~__
H. To have factory installed air conditioner, heater ~~
and defroster.
I. To have factory installed push-botton AM broadcast ~,~
radio. '~
J. To have inside mounted rearview mirror as follows: ~
1. To be suspended from above, free of vibration ~-~
and mounted at a height and position to provide
a combination of best rear and forward vision.
2. To be adjustable for day and night driving.
3. To be glareproof and free of optical distortion. C/
K. To have remote controlled outside rearview mirror on !/
left side, one stationary convex mirror on right side.
L. To have jack, handle, and lug wrench . ~--~'
M. Windshield and all windows to be tinted. ~~
N. To have heavy-duty, intermittent type variable
speed windshield wipers.
0. Floor covering must be carpet with vinyl inset.
P. Front seats must be bucket type. ~/'
Q. Interior trim, including-seat covering, to be cloth
and vinyl in color to match exterior.
R. Certified speedometer as offered in Police E ui ment
q P G~
Package to be furnished.
S. Spotlight - Unity No. 225 (or equal}, b-inch (15..24 cm)
clear Iens, 12-volt; for current model automobile. To
be mounted.. on left side windshield post or quarter
panel. Spotlight and outside rearview mirror must not
conflict.
T. Com lete under-coatin of undercarria e.
P g g C..~
U. Factory Power Steering.
V. Remote control trunk release within driver's reach.
W. Trunk .lamp. ~
X. Under hood lamp. L~
~~/
Y. Extra dome lamp forward mounted.
-- - i
fie, rr~ D ~=e-
Z. Tilt-steering wheel.
III. CHASSIS
A. Full wheel covers to be supplied.
• ~
B. Transmission to be automatic, three-speed, heavy-
duty type .
C. Heavy duty transmission cooler.
D. To have heavy-duty police front and rear brakes
with H.D, disc brakes on.front. Power brake unit
to be extra heavy-duty with dual master cylinder
and equipped with warning system with light in
instrument panel.
E. To have heavy-duty police front and rear springs,
shock absorbers, and front and rear suspension.
F. To have anti-sway bar on front of chassis.
G. To have anti-sway bar on rear of chassis if rear
suspension is equipped with coil springs.
H. To be equipped with five (5) GR70-15B police special
high speed textile cord radial black sidewall tires
(steel not acceptable).
I. Rim size to be b.5 X 15 inches.
IV. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
A. Alternator to be nominal 12-volt, minimum 80 ampere,
with "built-in" silicone rectifiers and transist-
orized regulator. Minimum output at engine idle to
be 40 amperes as measured by SAE recommended method.
B. Alternator charging circuit must have fusible link
in wiring hazness, or equal safety device.
C. Battery to be nominal 12-volt 80 ampere hour or 4,000
watts minimum.
D. To have special suppressor spark plug wiring and
wiring mounting bracket.
E. Ignition coil must be by-passed to ground with at
least .5 MFD 100-volt capacitor.
F. Ignition switch must have accessory position opposite
ignition position.
~~
ov r'~
L1
Np? a
~ ~
l/~
l~
v .
v '-
L/ _.
!/ _.
v "
V
L/
~1L
G. "Single Key" fleet keying.
H. Hood to have "radio bounding" to body.
. I. Shall be equipped with full instrumentation
including oil pressure, temperature, ammeter,
and f ue 1 gauges .
V. FULL SIZE VEHICLES
A. Wheelbase - 112 inches minimum.
B. Overall Length - 212.1 inches minimum.
C. Overall Width - 16.0 inches minimum.
D. Wheel Tread, Front - b1.8 inches minimum.
E. Wheel Tread, Rear - 60.8 inches minimum.
!~ p D
BASE BID ~Q~ C~ ~l ~ "-"'--
r~
u
G~ J `rT'i hJ 7~w c~ 9a~ S~ ~d"(.u c i~ ems, w ~ c~-M nroT
~ ti ~ V
.~
CITY OF NORT~3 F1Cl~LhND HILLS
BID QUOTATION FORr~
Bids submitted to the City of North Richland Hills for the below listed ~.`.
items 8h811 ,
be submitted on this farm in a sealed envelope addressed to the City Secretar of
Y
North Richland Hills, 7301 N.E. Loop~820, Fort Worth, Texas 76118. Bids shall be ~~
received not later than October 5, 1982 at which time all bids shall be publicl
Y.: ~.
opened and read aloud. ,- .
. .
~-~ -~. :.
~t
The, front of the envelope shall have the following information rimed or t ~ed -
p YF in.
the lower left corner: .. ~ ,~
i
"BID QUOTATION ENCLOSED" ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ .~
ITEM Police Packa e 4 door sedans fib} ~~ ~.~
. OPENING HOUR AND DATE; October S, 19$2~;~~~,:.~.~~ ~:~~:;~;:,, .
10:00 A.M, . ~ ::,.:. .j ,.~_..~,
- .>ti. ,. .
. _;. .
4 +..
The prices quoted on the Bid Quotation Form are "firm" and "real" rices, The Cit ~~~,'
of North Richland Hills reserves the right to re~e~t any and all bids and to re-~~'~ ~: ~;~~'~~:~-~, ~' `
6 ~ ~_:
advertise subject to notification, ~ . -~ ~ , ~ . .~
. ~~ <',~ .
.. ,,
THE PRICES QUOTED HEREIN AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID BY THE CITY OF NORTH, RICHLAND ~' ' ~-~ .~ ::-~~
.,
H LS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE OR BE HELD TO CONSTITUTE AN ORDER. ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ `~ - ~~ ~'
-
. . ~. .
_ - .. -. ,
r
•~
DATE . o TERMS OF B iD : ~~ ~ ~ d~~ / .~~ ~' - . ~~' ~~ ~-~: _~
BIDDER NAME : ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~11~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . ~ ;:N.~:%:hw?~'
.;::
ADDRESS . ~~ ~- ~ ~-~' ~ ~ .~- - ~ , .:~~., ..
UANTITY
NIT
ESCRIPTION OF ITEM BID ON
RICE . :.~ ..
..~
~~
TOTAL BID-:~`.~
~- .
tI ~~ .~
7
r ,,
J
G~ c~1~f~. - s ~ ~ ;
.~
7 ~c;`~~ ~ . ,
_~.
-,
,~~/~l ~~~~~a~
~
~y ~. ~Cl / GZ ~' r ~: ~ l G~
~ ~'l dC
~
.
-
~
,~~~ ~l" C ~~~ ~ /l7 ~'~,~ Grp ~ -
~ ~ ~ ~~
1 I ~ J~~ ~ GAL- ` ACT
~•
{~.
TITLE OF COMPANY OFFICER: .j ~' ~c ~' c~l<< CV ~~'l'~ll~~ ,~ - ,. ~~' .~:'~~:;~ .
l F/ _,-;.
-~:
~ Y ~~~
•:
~~' -~. a'
SIGNATURE . /~ ~ , , ..,- .:,, ~ ~~.
:~,..
.,
~, - ..
. -. -.
r 1
S .•
1, ENGIr~E
A. En~;i »c~ to b~ pol i cu h~av}--duty t yl~~ . '1'o have
special heavy-duty cr~inkshaft ;grid valve train
component: in addition to other special .cc~rnpo- .
nent5 di:sigt~cd for sustained high spE~'d pursuit
ap~~l~cations .
13. Engine to havt~ minimum rating of 30D pubic inch
displacement, ~~ four barrel carburator rcquirc~d.
C. In-line fuel filter.
D, Cooling system.
1. Radiator to be heavy-duty with capacity to
be maximum offered by manufacturer.
. 2. System to include fan shroud, S or ~ blade
fan and slip clutch.
3. System to be equipped with sealed coolant
' recovery system.
4. Heavy Duty -Factory air conditioning.
E, A11 hose clamps on the engine cooling and vehicle
cooling system to be of the positive closure type
to hold the hoses securely in position under high
pressure and rough road conditions: Tl~e clamp
shall consist of a rustproof steel band having
slots and a worm screw drive to permit t iglu toning
and reuse.
F. Dual exhaust (preferred}
II. BODY
A. To be four-door sedan.
B. Color: top and supporting posts to b~~ tan with
all other exterior painted surfaces to be dark
brown in color.
C. Armrests on all doors.
D. To have automatic pop-out cigar J.i~;hter.
E. To have extE~,~~-gal chrome moldings that are standard
equipment on deluxe model vehicles. To Dave vinyl
inserted body side moldings factory installed,
F. Covering for luggage compartment to b~~ vinyl or
fiber type mat.
In Alternate
Curn~~liance Bid
YfS
T~ ~~``~
e~~ ura v
35/ ouGr~r~
yF5
v~5
y~S
{~L S ,
Y~5
vas
VL 5
Y ~=5
^ a
r1
U
G, 'I'n have dial hurn~ .
~~. To havE, factory ins tal l~~d air Cc~~~c~i t ic~tlz~I , heater
and clc~froster.
Y. To have factory ii~;,tall~~d push-button 11P~ broadcast
radio.
J. To have inside mouclted rearviow mirror as follows:
I. To be suspended from abovu, free of vibration
and mounted at a freight and Pusition to provide
a combination of best rear and ~oi-ward vision.
2. To be adjustable for day and night driving.
3. To be glareproof and free of optical distortion.
K. To Have remote controlled outside rearvi~,w mirror on
left side, one stationary convex mirror on right side.
L. To have jack, handle, and lug wrench.
M. k'indshield and all windows to be tinted,
r1
U
N. To have heavy-duty, intermittent type variable
speed windshield wipers.
0. Floor covering must be carpet with vin}-1 inset.
P. Front seats must be bucket tvpe,
Q. Interior trim, including seat covering, to be cloth
and vinyl in color to match e~:terior.
~;
R. Certified speedometer as offered in Pc~lici Equipment
Package to be furnished.
S. Spotlight -Unity No. 225 (or E~qual~ , b-ir~c1~ (15.24 cry)
clear Lens, 12-volt; for currer;t model automobile. Zo
be mounted on left side windsi~ield post or quarter
panel. Spotlight and outside rearview mirror must not
conflict.
T. Complete under-coating of undercarriage.
U . Fac tor~+ Power S teerin~ .
V. Remote control trunk .release withi~~ driver's reach.
W. Trunk lamp.
X. Under hood lamp,
Y . Extra dome 13mp forward mount End .
Vas
y_r-S
yFS
V~-s i
Z. '!'ilt-5tc,e~ring ti•~l~c~~ 1 ,
III. CII AS5I5
A. Hull wheal cov~.~rs to b~: suj~pli~,~l.
B, 'T'ransmission to bti- automatic, tl-r~•c~-5p~f~d, }~,~~;~vy-
duty type.
C. Heavy duty transm;5siun cooler.
D. To have Heavy-duty police front ani~ riaar brakes
with H.D, disc brakes nn front. I't~w~r brake unit
to be extra heavy-duty with dual mastur cylinder
and equipped with warning systom with light in
instrument panel.
E. To have tzeavy-duty police front and rear springs,
shock absorbers, ;end front and roar suspension.
F. To have anti-sway bar on front of chassis.
G. To have anti-sway bar on rear of.ci~assis if rear
suspension is equipped with coil springs.
H. To be equipped with five (S} GR7U-151 police special
high speed textile cord radial black sidewall tires
(steel not acceptable).
I. Rim size to be 6.5 X l5 inches,
IV, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
. A. Alternator to be n,~minal 1?-volt, n;lni,nutn hU :~I»pure,
with built-in" silicone rectifizrs al~d transi~t-
orized regulator. Minimum output at engil~c idle to
be 40 amperes as measured by SAE rE~comincn~icd method.
B. Alternator chargil~g circuit must l~av~ fusible link
in wiring harness, or equal safety device.
C. Battery to be nominal 1?-volt SU ampere i-~our or x,000
watts minimum.
D. To have special suppressor spark plug, wiring and
wiring mountirl~.J bracket.
E. Ignition coil must be' by-passed to ~Tround with at
• least .5 MFD 100-voit~c~pacitor. .
F. Ignition switch TIll7St have accessory positi~~n opposite
ignition position.
r
~_
~~S
~5
y 5 ~.Q.~
:~,~ ' ~ti~ 1,1 ~
ES
/F~
y ~5
1' GS
~S
LS
_~~5
vcs
vFs
yes
~iEs
~J
yr-~
(~aaS/7ch iS
P> s c~
~~~/ X41%i~erE
1!. lit~ad to have "r:iciio t~uu-~di~~~-,'~ to k~ou~-,
I, Si~~all b~~ ~~q~~ippcd with lull ins tru~T~~~ntatior~
including; ui 1 pi-~~ssurr:~, tetl~pert~ture, an~m~~ter,
tirld ft~c 1 ~;:~u~;~~;~ .
V. FULL SI'L1r ~~LIiICLI:S
A. W~iEelbas~~ - 11? inct~e;; iniclir,»im.
~. Overall Length - ?1?.l inches minimum.
C. Overall Width - ~b.U inches tninir~~um,
D. Wheel 'I're3d, Front - bl.~ inches mi~~imum.
E. Wheel Tread, hear - b0.8 inches minimum.
~A~~E ~I1
r
_~4~5
yGS
r~~~~3
tl .
5 ~ 5
~-a~ a
yes ~a~~
10'387. ~~c~~l~
~~
1
DATE: 1-4-83
SUBJECT :,
Sale of Land
DEPARTMENT: Purchasin
BACKGROUND: The Cit of North Richland H
,.
and Lots 1 through 5 of Block 10 and Lots 1 through 5 of ~ Block 11 ~of the Irish
Meadows. Addition, Section III.
..
This land has been advertised for sale and sealed bids taken; 15 each sets of
. ,
specifications were picked up and two returned, the are outlined as follows:
P & S Construction $104,000.00 with stipulations
Steve Simpson Builders: $117,000.00 no stipulation
Steve Simpson Builders, Inc, is prepared to~close with 30 da s of the Cit Council
considerations and acceptance of his proposal.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Consideration of the sale of~said land at~the amount
stipulated. ~ Approval/disapproval
.~1 ~llC ETED ITF~'I: YES NO X
~~~.C:,OU~72' NUMBER: NIA ~ ~.
2
.s w..rr~r.r .r w~ rrr~.rrrrrr r.rrr rrr rrr~rwr rr~+rrrrrr--r--r-/ rr--r~-rr----w~-rrr--r---~~~r~r~r-AM~~~~r~~
'/
1
i
i
~, ~ ! ~ I.
~ •~I
80NOE0
UILDER
•
STEVE SIMPSON BUILDERS, INC.
6500 Precinct Line Road Office: 281-3221
Hurst, Texas 76053
December 20, 1982
Steve Simpson Builders, Inc. hereby submits a bid on
the following lots: ~ to the City of North Richland Hills
Lot lA Block 9
1.B 9
Lot 1 Block 10
2 10,
3 10
4 1 ~.
5 1Q
Lot 1 11
2 11
3 11
4 11
5 11
6 11 Irish Meadows
Section ZII
~t~0~o.
we are willing to bid $~,~00, peg lot -Total bid , ~ ,
I~,'e will close on said lots within 30 days of acceptance of this
bid.
I
Steve Simpson
President
r]
~ •
P ~ S CONSTRUCTION CO.
137 DAVlS BLVD, • 281.3509
December 9, 1982
• FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118
Mr. John~Whitney
Purchasing Agent, City of North Richland Hills
P, 0. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 7618
Dear Sirs:
Please accept this letter to submit bid fn lieu of the letter dated
DecernbQr 7, 1982, because of an error in part of the legal description.
P 8, 5 Construction Company hereby submits its bid of {104,000.00)
one hundred four thousand and no/100 dollars, for Lots 1 A 8, 1 B of
Block 9; 1 through 5 of Block 10; and 1 through 6 of Block 11
Irish Meadows Addition, Section III an addition to the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas with the following stipulations:
1. The City will issue building permits for immediate
construction,
2. The City will be responsible for concrete lining the
drainage ditch on the east side of Block 9 and 10,
3. The City will furnish the development construction plans
and topography prior to construction and
4. City furnished survey.
urs t .uly,
John Parish, Vice President
JP/bd
P ~ S CONSTRUCTION CO.
137 DAVIS BLVD, • 281.3509 • FORT WORTH, TEXAS 7fi118
December 7, 1982
Mr. John Whitney
Purchasing Agent, City of North Richland Nills
P. 0. Box 18609
North Richland Nills, Texas 76118
Dear Sirs;
P 8 S Construction Company hereby submits its bid of (~104,000.00~
one hundred four thousand and no/100 dollars, for lots 1 A 8, 1 H of
Block 9; 1 through 5 of Block 10; and f through 5 of Block 11
Irish Meadows Addition, Section III an addition to the City of
North Richland Nills, Texas with the following stipulations:
1. The City will issue building permits for immediate
construction,
2. The City will be responsible for concrete lining the
drainage ditch on the east side of Block 9 and 10,
3. The City will furnish the development construction plans
and topography prior to construction and
4. City furnishes survey,
Y rs t uly~
John Parish, Uice President
JP/bd
^ ~
BID StA~iARY
~~
~J
ITEM DESCRIPTION: DATE BIDS OPENED:_ ~a-/,,~-~.2.r.
~1
•
~_
•
.~.
~.•.
BIDDERS ~ EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT BID TERMS NET TOTAL
•T • ~
~~L..J
. ..
3.
_____~
O
. .._._
5.
i
b• .
_____._
1.
_____..
8.
_____
9.
10.
i
DATE: 1-7-83
+, ~ ~ '
. ;.
SUBJECT: Snow Hei~hts Street & Draina a Im rovements ~ ~ ^
:,
err • ' ~~i ^~r~~r ^ - - - - rrr^r^^~rrr~^r^~^r.~..r~rrr^^r~rrr^~~~rr.r~~i~r~.rr.~rr~rrirr~.rr~u^r^rr~.rrr~
i.
I~
DEPARTMENT: ~Public•.Works
BACKGROUND: This is another hase of the CIP ro ram, It covers several collector '
.. ~ .•
streets the main one being Holida Lane from Riviera to 820.
. .
~~ ..
•r~rr~r+r - - - r~~r unr~~• rrrrrr~.~r~~..r.~r r^^irr~rrr^
• .
^
^^,r~~r.~i^~^rnr^rrrr rrr. rrrr^r r.r~ r~wrr~~r __ - •r..w~.r r ^rr~r•.•rr-rrrrrr~w•
•
^
•
^ r ~ - ~~~
• ` r ~ ^
~~ • - - r^~^~r~rri r~~~~~~r i^~•r~rr r~^rl ~~I~Ir•r~~rr^r
C7T`~ COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ApproveJdisapprove the bid of Austin Road for $554,120.04
rye. y~^• ~ - r1 ~! ^r
~1p~~E"i~FD ITF:~i: YES X NO
_~____w
ACCU'~~tT NUMBER: General Fund Binds ~ _ ~ ~'
•v wrr.^~~rr•+~-rrr ^~rr~.rrrr rrr rr wrrrr r^- rr.r
i ~.
.+~
`(i .
s
M `,
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
• CONSULTING ENCItVEERS /Fort Worth-Callas
January 4, 1983
Honorable Mayor and City Counci 1
.City of North Richland Hi 11 s
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hi ] 1 s, Texas 16118
Re: 3.326, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
SNOW HEIGHTS 1982 STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
In accordance with your instructions, bids were received on this date for
the referenced project. This project includes curb and gutter, as halt
avemen p
p t and ut~l ~ ty l one reconstruction on the following streets:
1. Holiday Lane.
2. vance Road
3. Victoria Drive
4. `B"riley Drive ~~
The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the
tabulation indicates, bids were received from four ~4) contractors.
The low bid submitted was from Austin Road Com an P.O. Box 2285
p y~ ,
Ft. Worth, Texas 16113, in the amount of $554,120.04, for a total
construction period , of 210 calendar days . Recent projects by th i s
company include paving construction on Rufe Snow Drive, Phase I,
and on Onyx Or~ve North and Dawn Drive,
On the basis of the bids submitted, we would recommend that this Con-
tract be awarded to Austin Road Company i n the amount of $554, 120, 04,
for a peri od of 210 calendar days. The original engineer's estimate
i~as $542,000.
Shou] d you have any further questions concerning this project, we wi 11 be
present at the January 10, 1983, Council meeting to review the bids.
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P,E.
RWA/1 jc
Enclosures ~-
cc: fir. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mrs. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance .
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 •817/283-6211 • METRO/267.3367
~ r
~ ~ r
M `
i•
i
2 A O N ~O M ~O O~t1 Oct n0 ~~ ~
-~ ~(O
•
~
h
d t!'
) Cp
N C
O
r1 d
1~
d t1~ 0
~ N
'
f'7 117 r
t N 0 0
tt
~
~
~ O
C ra O ~ f\ O 1 ~A to d' M M
A O ~0 tl
A 1 ~O ~ ct r- + ~-+ N
• ~, AA
'
~ A ~
V
A 01
,-~
M O
(~ A
d ^ A
r-1 A
rt ri ~ ~
r
t .~ M M
t~ •7 t''1
• Y I
N
~ 0 0 01 M d O t~ ~ d
~
tL dm~ N
O to ~ 1
¢ p •~ t0 O O ~ N O ~ O N 1~ O N O O o 0 ~o to ra M d•
W p O f`O !'+') Nn ~ OGO a'1~ d O ~
-- -
Ina ¢ ~ d O O O M O to d~ CO d ~ ~~O t0
•
~,,, ^ x ce 1• d• N r+ c ~ o O d
W
W fl0 O a N O t0 ~.- ~ cr
y ~.,~ p tntt'~ GO O 000 0 00 0 CO
~p A NN t1 ~10M N 0000 0 OO Ct) 0p
•
0 to MAO et d• ~O O O M O O O O O O
i vln y
ciu ~o
~ MCo
~oo ct
tic ~nr+
M r• ~nodo
d~oN o
O ~noo
o0 ol. •-+ ao
~n N
~°
c~ x ~ ~
~0
tl~
O~
t1~
rt O a
~
M~ Q1 N
O
N M N
to o
M
~ N •-+ ~ 01 t0 tD ri ct ~
.
• 1
SC O
d~ A N W
to
~t0
N
OM
V~
OOr+O
O
O OO
tn
JOr • }- V
0 r.. tt ... .,.
r,
00
N
O
Oct
N
0000
0
0000
,0
~•• • ~d •~ aC aG ~ ~ r• O
.•~ N rl O
0 ~ N O
N M
~ O. O N O Or
• r~i ri
N Otn OOd•O ~?'O OON d 000 00 0 000000 ~
,••1
• IAO O•-•+Il~CQ!"~ o000~~D a0~ 4~ t~AN C~ 000 00 0 001000 t0 M
• ~ ~~
z~f~' x~o H r~Nf~d' dtOdt0 00tt 01 Mt1? tD Nt~AO MO O pOMOtIlO
D t0
~0
--~ .•t O 4J f\ h d t0 t1~ 01 Cp ~ N Ol t1> t!'1 N O CO 1~ N In d t1? N ~
tD
~' O
O p O .-~ N t
NOdtO c~"1 >ft0
L~CbF' ~ O 01 r-+O OtOMM ~d N dM Ol rt
tO t
) A
~ ~ ~ ~ V N Nt0 01 r+O~ IACO d N~-+ N r~Nr~ r"I tOMdM M N
~ p M r• t0 d O f~ ~.
>n
C
WOoO ~. ~
H~
~ M O
M N
~tl~C0~
0001
*~
~d
N
000
000
N000
~
W
V !- O ~ F- v
.....
¢ v=
r+ ~
O t1~N
NN
0
Od
M
11~t1f
00
~0~10
•
i: o ~ d
Q
~ r+N ^M NNM
al
t • .
00 ~O t1~tr~riO d•O CpCp N 00 Nt0 000 N0 O tT
CO M t1~ ~ u'! M CO 00 o O oo M m O o~ t1~ O o 1~ d• O
• ro~ ~.. d•01 N cr~MN 00 etlT Ol ~tn O r•+NN MCO O
O tlf ?C ~••~ y N N CO t0 O t; d lA •-~ to .•~ ~ f\ d ra tp N ~ f\ LA N
^ O
V N f\ ~D N N et tt~ tl~ .-1 t\ M •-~ M •-+ t0 01 O ct ~ N d O ~ a!
H ~ w w {n (~
O N
N V .-~
M ~ CG ~ .-~ ~ O ra O ~ r! N d •-+ Gp .-~ .~•~ N tf~ ~ N
O ~
¢
~ d ~
...
~"" ~
~ G ^
t0 L M
x O 1'''1 W
Ot0 ON
~~ O1
000
Od'
Ol
tl~O
01
r;ON
d00 r~Q
I
1
^ # 00 N NM OM N Ntn 001 x-+NtA Md 1~ I
......
F-•O d~ r M
~ I i
O '~
O O d N f'7 ~ 1
'Q . O d 1 f
}" d Lfr
¢
a I
O ~ 1 1 1
--~ p ~ ~"' t0 1~ lA ri to O M t0 t0 N O 00 tb ~ tt ~ N 01 l0 O 1 I
m .. _
~ N n
~ M O
O~ O
O~ 01 n
t1'! N M
O r{ CQ *~ rt
O 01
~ ltd 1 1
1
p ~ X A 1
.•
~' =
d O
N
t~A N
N
N
N
t0
~
t0 1
1
~~
W W ri .•~ N N 1 1 1
~ O
... 1 1
1" f., ~ i
p
~ ~- ti tl. tc.u. ~- >- >- vvt.,,~
¢¢ •¢ vv
¢<C u vvv
Q m ¢4¢ u.~
I 1
i
Vt/1 JJ InN N y N WWJW WW W.J WWW JfJ1 1
O 1 I
d0 Z I
Q r
1
~... 1
1
W N I I
1
~ ~ t~.. 1 I
z +n
•r-
aJ
! 1
¢
1 ~ 1
~ i 1
W~ ~o s~. a~ ~ r 1 1 1
}., a,
I aJ
• +~ ~ u 1
4 ~
c
+~
v
o
c~ c +~
c I
I
o ~ ~s c
E~
~ o 1
u ~- a
i
~ s
. t 1
O~~ t ~ .a, s.~n X Xx EOE F- 1
~. = Z ~~ •iS L 4..a L7 •r• O OO VWUaJ I
o 1
°D ~ ~
.Y a~ c+~
•r t!1 v
C c m
Z3 •r mm
~ ~ u ro v
r- A r- b
G I 1
1
W .C ~ ~ y = tt.
3 3 3 '- 1
_ } Z •r ~ ' • 0 a~
4~ J 1 1
O .C u'f !~ L V- .yC Vl O 41 aJ QJ OC a! OC a1
' 1
Z O
C Vj ~ ¢ ro C t rpM V 'r'~•r> >> ~ d L 1
v~ o a
F. ~- 3t ~, •r ~.. ~-- ~~
a~• ~ O L •~
t c cti
•
v, ro ~--
ro C1 aJ
ca~Ca~ aJ
~ I 1
!
_'' •
J
d a c: a~a, u ~ v r
u
aJ s
> ro •.- c •r c ~ 1
. cn ~+
..r -
•~ o s.
r Vi QJ > cr
r c cr
--• 3 Y .
.
r d J •r J r- 3~ 1 1
•r~ L ro • ~ V O O+•' a1 O al J C i
a~
a~ aJ
~
• p c h > > qu o
• c~rro roro u
u
•
- u •
u E
a~ m 1
1
,,,,. W ro s. c~
u aJ aJ
+~ ~ c
~ ~•~+ v +~ ~C v
V ~ ro
a) E V o ,
r
> •~ > •~ >
O V
.J tL
= O O ~ C O 'O
c
1/? aJ a
s. s. 3
aJ a3
E r••
ro• +~
u X >
• o i a ~c
~ M X X s. > L >
o o w a~ s. as s. ~C I-
-- z I
„_
u W • r- ro U U > N • r t r0 m a) m O v1 aJ (!! a, n0 O 1 •
.
i V ro
m C C •r
s
a, i
a
~
E 3 0 etS
ta,o~~ tits ~ a
a~ C v) vs
rr s. i V aJ O
ac~
occ
OC y 41
r
oo
.
O
¢
> y ''~
~
r
a
O
'
-r 1 = = W L
E 7 r•• V} V > > > '
+•~ +~ aJ ~
-- al V O
~
d O
~ F„~ V C1 C3 aJ R! F V) i0 aJ aJ al 'G 3 3 r' rC +~ ro +~ C J m Z
w
~~ ~ o cc - ~> > ~ >ir-aJ aJa~~ 3+o3ro O4~Q
p Z "~ r r. a1 = > V ~0 U r- r- a7 a! 3 3 V E F- D -~
~ } Z
~p '4 a ! w t o w u u Q 1 ~ •r a0 r O r' aJ r aJ I ~ ~-- 0~ U
1
~, ,1, N
O M r ~. •r
X r r
XX C C
O O W Q
W = C O
~ rd ~"~ ~ b S. r 1] r-
> C ~ .a N
• • n-
r W W VU L = 3N i Rl ro~O 'r•CO~ N
~ fh v l O L O ~0~ ~ O~ ~^ y
n00
•
vl aJ a! d • O = X+ c
V F
O - F- M ~ t0 t D M N O +~ L L F -
~
•• O K
W V E M
E
~ I
V I x
•O= Xxx v ococ
CptO:
~
us
OC x •• C a1
~ U=
~ OC t :
l) tD ~ O: ¢ ~D O t 0 M N .
N O VY J N J ~ D ¢
.~ ,a W
x m y }~
p o0
•.
O
"~ -• .
10 .~ tl~ P. O •-~ N
~ D1 O .
••~N ••~ N M
NNN to t0 f\ 00 C1 O ~
N N NNNM -+
M
. .-r
•
,~
~~~
a ~:
DATE: 1-7 82 .
SUBJECT: Glenview Drive Project
. ,~
Dgp~~~; Public Works
BACKGROUND: It was discovered that additional drainage inlets were required to make the
,.
draina e s stem work more effectively. Our agreement calls for us to pay 70% of this
com fete ro'ect. I have an agreement~~from Chisholm Trail Construction Co, to put
.~
.. .
in another inlet on our side of Glenview near Booth Calloway. We checked this area
on~a rain da and found the ro ect did not have enou h~d~rainage for our'side.
Chisholm Trail $3 785.00 ~ ~ Richland Hills $6,249.36
~~ less 30% Richland Hills $1'135..50 less. $1,135.50
N. Richland Hills share 2 649.50 N.~Richland Hills owes ;~5 113.86
~-
CITY COUNCIL ACTION RE UIRED: Approve payment of $5,113.86, to Richland Hills and payment
Q
of $3,185.00 to~Chisholm Trail Construction for storm drain work on Glenview Dr.
Appropriate $8,898.86 out of general fund reserve for this project.
BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: General Fund Reserves .~
r ~
ww~wwAw~rw~w~wwwrrw~rrrwwww~rrwrrrr~rw~~rw~r rrr~ err . rrr~w r~+rr.r~rwrr~rwrrrrrrr~rrwr~rr~wrw+~.u~r~.wwr
a
.-
~~.
~~~ ciry o~
C~*~~
•~y<AND ~\v
I~
i ~•
CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
284-4901 3200 DIANA DRIVE RICHLAND H1LLS, TEXAS 1b118
December 21, 1982
Mr. Dennis Horvath
City of North Richland Hills.
P. 0. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Glenview Drive; Change
Order Number One
Dear Dennis: ` '
The City of.Richland Hills has forwarded payment
for the above change order, adding storm sewer
inlets along Glenview Drive, to the State Highway
Department.
The total payment, as you can see, was $8~92?.66.
The North Richland Hills portion of this payment,
refundable to Richland Hills, is $6,249.36..
There is a possibility that all or a portion of
this money could be.refunded at the conclusion
of the Glenview Drive work.
Should you have any questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
Bob Miller
City Administrator
., V
'~ ~ ~`,
•~J
~~
., r ~ ~=
.~~~ /
~ ` ~'
ciry
(~*~~i ~
v
v
. y~AND ~
i~
CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
2844901 3200 DIANA DRIVE RICHLAND NILLS, TEXAS 76118
December 21, 1982
Mr . John Wa ld i~e
State Department of Highways and
Public Transportation
P. 0: Box 6868
Fort Worth, Texas 76115.
Re: Glenview Drive; Change ,
order
Dear Mr. Waldie:
Enclosed is a~ check. for $8, 92?.66 which: is forwarded
in order for Field Change Request No. l ~to ~ be processed.
This payment includes the portion for~North Rich~.and
Hills.
Respectfully yours,
~ .
~, ~ ~ ^~
Robert W. Miller
City~Administrator
cc: City Secretary
i ~~
• . •
- ---_ - _- - - -•f.
~ \/
;` r'"` "• ~; ~`• ~' -~- „`, ~r'~-~; GENERAL': CONTINGENCY=~ FUND~~.'~-i'r'
.," ~.., : • ~~` -'..' - .- ~-"ACCT•; - # 5 0 9 ~5 8 5 6~ V ~ " , .,
.. • -. r` ~~ ~.~,,,,.•~ ,r ~~,.,•'~'r~~ ^I•v rte.
..~~. ~~`~- s . ' CITY QF RICHLAND HILLS. ~ ~ ..• '
.•_•.
'~~ ..
•,~ • ;,`,.., •_ ':- ~ . =~, i ~`; 3200,DIAI1'A DR:.. 28,-4901- ~`~y ~~' ~.,,~'`~ ' :"•.•~~ _ -~ -~•. -- -~ ..- - •`'~'~.•
-~.;:. ~ ~~~ a• ; ~: -..; ,~.ti ~-• ~ • `..- :;~ . ~,,;,,~..~ -~.~.,, ~A ~-,~ i ~~~; - ~ ~~ December" 21-~'~•`'', ~'~:
• 19.82 ~.
~•
1~ • 7 /"'~~• 1'`•. rte. ,I' • ~+ ~~ "..^,. ^e~'~ ~•ti_ ~' ~~ y^_ /~rA ~ ~,,~,~.
.. w ppY E1 ht' • Thousand • Nine • Hundred. •Twerity :Seven `and 6 6/10 (~ w'-, ~, ~ , f•.~.,~
•
r
~ 1/ 4
~~ ,, ~..,,.~ State , Treasurer•~-- •Accoun~ ~of~~^-•~~~~-~., -• .,•~.~,,~*.~~;'-.,,..;
-. • • 70 ~•,,- , ,~,,,~,,~,.,,-~ , '- •.~,•• . n ~ .~''~ ~„ '~'"'' CITY OF RICHLA-ND H ...
• `'O R D E '.. •~ ~ yfiruS t;~un~. ~ ~ 9 2 7 ;•~~"~' •~- -' .,~~ .~ i,~-n,,.r~.~.~.~..` ~.
. ~~'~ "'1~~ •! '-~'R, rVf~Y ~• ~, ` " ..t , 1"/ ~ ~' ~ ,•~, .•r,. • ~ . ~ fir' ~, w `~/ ~ ••
•~,~_ . _
'-•~,,;•~`~'"-•,,NORTNEAS7 NATIONAL. BANK'~~FORT-WORTH,-TEXl1f ~• ~,• - ~ '
M,p`r~~,v~~ •• -~,,rti•••ti~~•1,u~.~ + a .~'~~ ^~~ ••`•`•~' `•AUTHORIZED R ESENTATIV; v./fir''. ,,-„•,~ ''"'
.. w I'
r ' ' ~ ~ .,, ~ ~. ~~~ p 0 ~ 6 ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 11.9 ~ 3 ? 8 ~ ^~ ~'~ ,,~' --•• ~`,~.• , ,.~-~~ .~~'~.~. ,•~..' , - ~.•~• ,..
8 '
~• •~ ~r ~ ~• •~ ~'~•~ ~ ~•~ ~•.~.~ a..~~ '~•~ '~ ~ ~.~ r ~'' ` '•~ ~, r •~ ,ice ~ w' ~ ~~~ ~~^ ~'~/~•f ~~~\.~ •~I ,`!~~•..,••~.'"~•. •~•~ J\. •• 'tea '•
•~ •.~ ~ r
~ r. . v • V .~ a. f ti f•+ J • •a , a~ 1 , _1 ' . \ 1 /r .~ 1r Y \_ _ /~~•~ ~ ~~~ ~"'~. \,• •".1. ~ ' . ..•• . l~ • "r"' • ~• • ~, t
1 '•, •, ••"c.. ` ..;•~'/.,~ r .~• ~ •.~\ _ '• •. .+ ,~. .. '~ ~ . • ,•f `'•R~ .. .\.~~~ra~•~r' `•,/~1'rI •I ~. •i..,~••.•a ~ .J~a...~~ •••,+.r., .I• • •, d~•
~~ _ •; • .~ _ "~. -" ,~•`"•:•, • CITY OF R1C~HLA,ND HILL$r REMIT'T ..-• ,,~,,~,,,, _~,v~,1-~ • r . „ _. ,~•+ » ..~ ,.,~- . • .,.
,= . ~ , ANCE VOUCHER -•..~,, -~~ •. _ ~ .. ~ ~ ;~. - • _ , •
• ~ ~ •'~+ INVOKER DEDLJCTION^ '
1 . ' • ... - , ••. ~ = _ » • AMOUNT ,•
2-21-82 , .•Glenview Drive - .1-12--560 J-~~--~ ~`"•~r ~= ~~ = • .- -• •`"~•~~ ?~-
t ~ •,
,' ~ ,••,,~~ ti~ 4, .r ~ • • t~~r/ •y r/EMI ~ _• hy/"y~ i••~:• ~. . •V ..~ .•ti ~• ~ \ _ • y~. •••' •
-.r
' 1 - •.. ' • ' a •.
•`M • ~• •.r • • . r {.
s~ 1~•A
• , .. • ..r
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE CASHING . = ~•:.- •,:'}-:•.'.' •,'-~.••• - ` ~ •
. ~ .,
•
i•
•. rw • ,.,
..;ice '~•~y ~
.,. r
:.~r ~ r.
!`~
COMMISSION
-•-
ROBFR7 H. DEDMAN, CHAIRMAN
A. SAKI WALDROP
.fOHN R. BUTLER. JR.
•
a~~ ~J~
"~ ~
r
. , ~
•
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Post Office Box 6868
Fort Worth, Texas
76115
December 2, 1982
ENGINEER•DIRECTOR
MARK G. GOODE
~•~
IN REPLY REFER TO
FILE N0.
i
Pro ject M B662 (4~
~ 334-Glenview Drive '
Tarrant County
Mr. Robert W. Miller
City Administrator i `
City of Richland Hills
• Richland Hills, Texas 76118
..
Dear Sir:
transmitted are two copies of Field Change Request No. 1 along with two
blueline prints of the accompanying Plan Sheet 9A.
In order for this field change to be processed, it is necessary for the
cities to forward to this office a check or checks for the total amount
of $8,927.66. Phis includes 10°!o for contingencies and construction
engineering.
. Yours very truly,
J. R. Stone
District Engineer
. ~
' ~ ~
~ ~ t
'
r
1, ~~~,~,. ~.~
By: 0. L. Robinson
District Construction
Engineer
J'Wlch
Attachments
i~•
_ ...
:.:.%:• ~ - -.... ~ .. ti.
f
*;.. .. ~ ~=._ ..r..
r~t~~ 4 ,'-f+ ~Kp,R:o~cnt of «ltbn7Yt
~~-~: ~'~ ~ bIk TrtutspatUtkn
r
.~ -. . ~- ,, t u
~.~: _;_i
... t.
.:~-
•.
APPROVAL OF CHANGE IN PLANS
'.~ 6
F. C.~~ ReQuest No. _..1....._.._.-. Accompanied bl Sketches or F. C, Plan-Sbeet9 I~'umbered ..9A~r~-~-^~rw... Harp. No~.~~+----
„~r_rant - ~ ~ Cou>itT, Federal Proi. No. _....~_ B~.~~ {.~~..._._ ...............................~..., Coatrol~8b~5r2.-.Z-S
TO THE ENGINEER-DIRECTOR:
Appro~~al of the following changes in pIsns andlor specifications is requested.
Limits: Sta..+3~ _.~.._ to Sta...~1.-1~2.....-
Description: Add three 15 Pt. Street Inlets.
This field change is requested for the following reasons: Additional Streets Inlets needed to reduce
:ponding until future storm sewer system is cor~structed. To be paid for by the City of
Richland Hills.'
4
4
0
6
6
7
7
2
FIELD CHANCE gUAN'CiTlF..S ORiCtVAL PLAN QVAN?1?IES
INS DI:SCRII'TION
a _ Ut,lt
OuaAtltr
f'nntract
I'~~ Aniou~tt
Qvtwttty
Coattat:t
Pita
Amooat
- ~ ~f.1 ~ .O ~ '
~-668 A r G Gr 2 TOH 2, 398, 92 ____ 27.5 b .,.9_74, 3. ,.~!~,~ ~ ~;g4,t~;
1 ~r . 1 Sew .! .. _...].4.~9 .~.
IIl4..
3 P e 2r,3 ,
Q
5-50 P et~l r 4:~$,S
0-826 Inlet Comp ~Curb~ X15 F ~ , pQ ~~ ~~
1-577 Rin & v •
2-540 Conc C ~ I ~~,g tom, ~
.,
Total • • • • • • • • • • . l~.,3~.~,.~._Totat • • • • • • • .... s l ~(~ . (l~ 5 _ 5~
vet Underrun ...... t Net Overrun • • • • . • . _ ~ . ~ I6 . n5 ,~
Respe,^t~u reques by: Recommended for Approval by:
•....• ..•... ...... .• .................. r.r .........................~..... .. ....•...................•.... •....•.. •.....•................ .........................w~...
•tden/~~ ~tn~er Date CAlft Engln~~r o~ H1~RK•ar De~itn Date
~• I~' ,
.. .•
Dt1t t't~irt F'„¢i•~rt, l1l~intrn~ac+e i ppentkas Dat•
... NY ............M........ .... ................ M......-.. . • ..... •.......... •....•... ..... .... ................ •...•....1.....1..1..................... ..M.........N.....M..y..~-
Llatrtet Engineer Date Hrldat En~IntYr Date
....................._._...................... ............. ................................Approved .......................................................... ...........-.~..._..~...
~~ Engineer 2lan~er Date Con~truttion Entine~r Dato
Verified by :....... ...... A rov d ......_.
................. .............. ... ....................... pp a ............ ............._ ................ ..A.. M......-..Y .......
Initlala Dat• ~ati•rsi•Uin~r Dat•
'C'UTE: F.~ht copies of chic form must be wbmitted to the Statt: D~p;,rtment of }~ighw~ys and Public Transportation Main oil'ia through the ofPix oP tht
Dis~rict En;inee:r for t:xh Pied change requested on Federal Aid Projtc~s exc~~x Federal Sea-ndery, and five copies for C~t'1d changes on S~:e and
Federal Sccondarl~ i'rojectt.
CTC CHISHOLM TRAIL CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
CORPORATE OFFICE - P.O. BOX 18337 - FT. WORTH, TEXAS 76118 - (617) 589-0921
GENERAL CONTRACTORS HOUSTON DISTRICT OFFICE - P.O. BOX 34770 -HOUSTON, TEXAS 77034 - (713) 487-5562
PiEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO THE COMPANY
ATTENTJON OF tHE WRJTER
.~
January 6, 1983
Mr. Gene Riddle
City of North Richland Hills
P.O, Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: Glenview Dr. Paving, Drainage
State Dept, of Highways &
Public Transportation
CTC ,Tob No. C-167
Sir:
we are su~ni.tting our quotation for installing a 10' standard storm drain
inlet along the north curb line of the 7700 block of Glenview Dr., North
Richland Hills, Texas, The inlet is to be located between the currentl
Y
installed new drives servicing the Gas Inn and the Swim Center, between the
NE corner of Booth Callaway Road and Glenview Dr, and the new bridge we
installed on the above referenced contract.
Our price will include the follc~ring:
- Barricades as required.
- Removal and haul off of the existing sidewalk, curb and gutter, and 8"
thick asphalt base road surface.
- Furnish and install up to 30 LF of 18"~ Class III RCS to tie the pr sed
inlet into the existing drainage conduit.
- Ftiirnish and install a 10' standard inlet w/l~ R + C c~nplete.
- ~irnish and install replacement 8" thick asphalt base road surface around
the proposed inlet.
- Burnish and install 4" thick x 3' - 0" wide sidewalk to replace that
removed for the proposed construction,
- Perform the necessary back fill and finish grading to replace that dist-
urbed by the proposed construction.
- The above work will be.performed equal to State Department of Highways
and Public Transportation standard specifications.
This proposal is contingent upon receiving a purchase order frog the Ci of
North Richland Hi ~
lls on or before 1/10/83 & our being able to start the pro-
posal work 1/11/83, we will provide a certificate of insurance.
The city can retain all payment until the proposed work is car~lete.
k4
~ IC
~ K ~ ; ~~~1ME1~~~~~ iMT~ IITT
Ij~ON'i' S
"An Equol Opportunity Employer"
City of North Richland Hills
Page 2 ~ ~- ~~~
January 6, 1983 (~ ~ ~' '
Our price for the camplete above described work is $3,785.00.
Sincerely,
PJS/vlp
Enclosures
c.c. File
Kenny Peck
~~ ~~
y,
~ ~
cHZSxo~ ~L c+~vs~cr~~v oo. , Svc.
Peter J. Stahl
Project Manager
~~
DATE: 1-6-83 .
SUBJECT: Glenview Drive project ch~~n a order
DEp~~~; Public. Works
BACKGROUND: It was discovered that a ditional draina a in '
,.
make the drainage system work more effec ively. Our greement calls for us to a
v
70/ of this complete project. I am trying to get an Cher,inlet ut in on our side
.~
of Glenview ar~d I will come back 1 to ~
a r with a ro~val for this.
..
~~
.~
P
.~
• f
i.-
~ ~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve payme t of $6,249.3b,to Richland Hills. It is
further recommended that $6,249.3b be appro riated from General Fund Reserves and
allocated to this project.
BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: General Fund Reserves
~ ciry
•* ~
~~~
~~
y<AND
o.~
~ * CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
' (/~ 284-4901 3200 DIANA DRIVE RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118
`Vv
December 21, 1982
Mr. Dennis Horvath
City of North Richland Hills
P. 0. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re; Glenview Drive; Change
Order Number One
Dear Dennis:
The City of. Richland Hills has forwarded payment
for the above change order, adding storm sewer
inlets along Glenview Drive, to the State Highway
Department.
The total payment, as you can see, was $8,927.66.
The North Richland Hills portion of this payment,
refundable to Richland Hills, is $6,249.36..
There is a possibility that all or a portion of
this money could be refunded at the conclusion
of the Glenview Drive work.
Should you have any questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
s
Bob Miller
City Administrator
xJ
1! ~,`
,~!~1
a~ ,r,
~~~ ti ~~
~l./' ~~
1
P. k^~~ ~,. ,~ r,,
:~ ~~
ciry
~ * ~ '~ ~
~y<AND ~`v
CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
284.4901 3200 DIANA DRIVE RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 761 i8
December 21, 1982
Mr. John Waldie
State Department of Highways and
Public Transportation
P. 0. Box 6868
Fort Worth, Texas ?6115
Re; Glenview Drive; Change
Order
Dear Mr. Waldie:
Enclosed is a check for $8,927.66 wh~.ch is forwarded
in order for Field Change Request No.l to be processed.
This payment includes the portion for~North Richland
Hills.
Respectfully yours,
~~~ ~ ~~
Robert W. Miller
City~Administrator
cc: City Secretary
Inr~l ~
• A
~ t
v
,
•
' ~~.. .4 ,,.. '~' ,e` f y _w,,s ~,~+~ `r ~ 'Q`v/c` .~-.~• Z " , - ~- .J_, err .. `1^
• `Y /,s++, s ~! ' • . _ ".~~ `.~ _ 1~'~~~~ ~./~ I'~_~/1I ~~,` 1../' ~ rrf ~1.,~ - ~+~a~^ /~.-.A~ ~.~.wt,`~~ v,w`~~ ^~,,,1 a ..1r
_ `~---.•~,,,',. • ~-.°--r~` ~.~ ~'~.~^/ ~~.-~ GENERAL CONTINGENCY ~ FUND '~':~.•'`•~~-": ,.'
-, ~,' `._ ,,'-,~_ ."'„/' _. <<.~,~,,,,,^ ''`•.~.~~` ACCT ~' •509 ,5856-1``''~`'~~,,~~°.'~+,- .. ~. - +,r..
~• ' - ~~'~= ' CITY OF
• '-~~.•• .• -`~" ~- ••. .~- ,, ~ .RICHLAN~ HILLS ~~.,,•~ :,~-,~..-•- ~'~ ~~;,~~:;.1~w+- .,~~ J` ~.~~-•~~.~~. 0 0 6 ~ .
' `. ` '. a .". . i •, w~ • ~ '~ `..• ' ` ~ r/ ... s.
>• y • 1` ' r. .. r »~ ' ~ • ~~~~ / `~/• ` f'•~r1' , f w.r. a /~`'•~.I'` Y ` ~ y.
'~,, .,- ~y s- . , :-.~~-•' ,~ 3200,•DIA1~A DR: -..28914901-'`~,''Y~,,~~~,,~.I~,,,~••,~,,•~ -~-~,,,,:,,,,~.~ ~~-,..--~`-' ..~ .~~•-'~., -4. .- ~''~•~''Y" ~;. '~"'
• ,,,. . ~. A' ~, ~ 'fir ~~,,~,,,. ~f " \~ ~-~ ~ '~.•~' t ~, -•.. •'' ~ ,.~'"`!'~" - ~ ~
- ' ~ `~~~.~,.,~~,,.,,~~, ,',..~,=ti-;ter." December] 21~ ~~s 82~ ~~; .~,
~J `r• ~ ~ +_ ~ ' y~•h,,.•~. ~- /~r~lY~~~r/1,~,~ 1 `,~'~~./~` ~•~f•~-`~'~ ,,+''~f\~~wr ` ~~"~..~.~~,,,,~r` w ,~~, _ `1~I '+-/^ '~„••.~.~` .,
' .. PAY E1 ht Thousand Nlne I~undred Twenty Seven -and 6 6/10 ~ `"~'~'''`^"'"```~'`r~^~-~-~rr~,/~~_~, ~,~,~~-`•' ~~,
.,, '~ •"` .. ` .. ~~ '~-,~/f \ _r'~- .~TI~y~ ~/' ~~~ /1,~~/r.~t~ •t\,~,ti,-~ ~I"~ ~~yl`~ /•~L1 ~ '~'~ • ~'~1~ ~,/ ~r ~ •'~j/' y!'~'', r
.1 ~: f - ~ .R ~ +r'~.v ~...I• ~ ' • `- ~~~ ~ ~~'~ w~ I ~. / •''ti~•%`~•~/1'• . y, / ~ _ `«~ ~ -~~~ ~ ~-~_''`~~/~~11t '`~1' 1~./ti ~L_ ~.. `~/ ' ~ ~r~` •`.. • ,
,` To ` + r:..>~.. ~~~f State ~~Treasur~r~--~•,A r ~ ,-r'',,.,~- '"-~~,' ~ ~/''~,~..~ ~.~~.. ~ .~~.
THE , `~ ~.:`,~~~:~I'rl]St ~~ und: 9 2 `~'~*=~"'";~;,~~`~= `~'~ a~. CITY OF RIC~iLAwD HrLLS~'"~.''~.: . ~.:
ORDER -,.. - ter..,, ,,,~ - .,,~ 7.ti,,.r ...~,~,,... .~:..- ,~ ~ . ,~,• ,,,,, ."~,.~..•~. .~• . .,,:.
R `_° c••++' 4' t. I fr a,~ -r,,~^~'~ y'~ ~~+/ti ~~ ~'^/'~~+A~~w~~- `~~,~ ~~~ ~" ~~/~~,/~/~'wJ `.1f •,'4.../'~. ' .,,a' •.
~T _+'` "' ~ : +'~ • „sue. ~ ,~'. ~''' '`~"r ~,.~~ ~ a~~~; rV'+.• ' r ~' ~ r+~ ~..r ti, /'•l,.r - .
` r~+
~+ '~~. ..~ .~ ..`,'e r•'Ir'''"•"'r.- ter" ~ ~-+'' .~'9~~ ~.*~~,,~M~,~ ~ ~,.,a.•'.~•''~ . .., ''/ r•. ,r .. .~rr•+r~ i''' ~~'•~*.- •.~,.••-.
r,.'/~~-.,j'r`tt4,r'- 'V' '/~• ~~r+' ~ ~/ -'. ~a./~1r+~.+ _I'~~''~,r. -~~~ 'y-1 ~+ ~y•~.I w.V,. ~~ ~ ~`. ~+• ..' "` '+~- ./`.
`•~ ~~. \/~ 1r~•~e.+~~~11~/R~ r„~~,~^M ~~ \~~~~~ 1 f-~•~~'~` ~t~,!~~~~ rear., •r n~1~: ~ •~/~,~~w /~y/~~ ~.•~~ Jv~»• •ti ~ •t~,
\.It ~'1y~ •'~ ~s~ .•,J+~_,,/~,. ,A. ,~,\.~ ~••y~ t~~ ~ ~I'~.F~'~i Vr ~ r1~1~"+~,~/_,/~~ 4'~ y~ a~' ' f' ..I' .,.~`~ ~..'/...,
• ~
,_~..re~'hr ~ ~`• r.s~ ~' ~t. '~`,I'-_~_~~~s~/~1,~'..`y'~ °~~~'~r,~~\ ~ ~ d ~ ~ f~y17I/rV>_„Ir~~,.•+~r,.,! fr1-~ r., h.
'''"-"~' NORTHEAST NATIONAL BANK •..FORT W' ~ ~ ~'`•'~~ ~ ~`"''` " --' ~+'~' '""~'
QRTH TEX ~. '"' •..~
+" ~ ~~ ~~%~ _'r~~~~+"~+'~ ~/ ~••`~ ~`"r•~-v~'~ ~fr'~`~~~ ~~, ~~ ~`~~V~'` ~ ~ `'~_-~~' AU7HGRIZED R rE.rS•E~NTA~,TIYE -''., .. r.. ,, ~ ~ •
- '•-.'~ ,,.~. , ''~'•''~- 1rs,~~v. _~ `•~,/,. ~• ~~~~.•r` ~^ V ~ •~~' ~M_Y./`1~"~.,~~'''`.~"'~'.l~~~` /wr`~~i1' r R•~..!/~ '.-~~, ` r../',~ ^-.,~' .~...
-.. w..,.i • ~
~ r-' ,. '•~. ,.. • ~1-' • 4 i, • :.f' J ~ ~ ,. ~i ~k .•a . ~ ~ ~ y`.+ •~ .n.,~~Y ~~ J~ ~v' ~,'~ r ~ ' f ~~.~.> .,r.•.~,~ -1u.~ r • iF, r ter. 1- ~ `.,~ ~ ~.~ ~, ~ ~'~ ~. ~ ~ t ~-
„ r., .' •' `'., .rr. `r,F:.`..*~.. ~'•- `.,~ fe•.. ~- ._'..'~/-•r~e'. > ~r_.f•`+..` rw, ,. ~ •f^4..'` ~ .'r ,./. t~_'>'•~ w ~~'Ma~ ~\~~~~./~~'~~~•, jX •~v~~r•t % ~~, ~' ~'rI ,t.- ~~ ~y., ~v- ~
• . - - •CITY QF RIC,HL,AAJD HILLS, REMITTANCE VOUCHER--~`~.w' ' "•,~yr d" 1rM~~ • ~ r•.,• ~--,,.,,, ` ti ;, .,` •.. ' - ~~. ' "' .
~.w• "~.
` DEDUCTION/ AMOUNT
12-21-82 .~ .Glenview .Drive • - .1-12-560~..~:~ :; ~:~- _•,, ~ 1 ~ ^ . , ;• y
- ` r •~ ti ~+' ;~ ' f ,~,,•• ~ • ,..~ +. J ~, ',~ ~ \.. a ~ /~ • _ - J'am' . r ~ ,. r , ~
. ~ ,~>~•r' ~7l ~:~.f ~~•~~~1~w•.iMr•i.lr .. `' ~rr ~ \"r ~ ~ ~~I' w,,Y ~'~. -~ ~l -~ ~ 4 ,•• , .s`~. ~~ - r w,.` - ,± "~ ' •',, ' , .~
x
.+ ^,
~ /' • .
- ~ ... w _
• ,
i~ IO.A -
' PLEASE DETACH B -• . , . -, .. }.. •
EFORE CASHING . ,.- -+': .- ,
• w _ ~
~ .
. ..
' . '••
- ~' • ~ ~ ~ ,rte '`+.` ~ _ •.r ~,~ r'• , -,. •v ~` ~ ~ ~;_ Y• • ~ - _ - ~ ..
~ .. ~.»MJ+....
r il~
. - ,
COMMISSION
R06ERT H. DEDMAN, CHAIRMAN
A. SAM WALDROP
JOHN R. BUTLER, JR.
~J ~
,__ •1
:~ C
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Post Office Box 6868
Fort Worth, Texas
76115
December 2, 1982
ENGINEER-DIRECTOR
MARK G. GOODE
~..~
IN REPLY REFER TO
FILE N0.
Pro ject M 8662 ~4)
MH 334-Glenview Drive
Tarrant County
Mr. Robert W. Miller
City Administrator
City of Richland Hills
. Richland Hi11s, Texas 76118
Dear Sir:
Transmitted are two copies of Field Change Request No. 1 along with two
blueline prints of the accompanying Plan Sheet 9A.
In order for this field change to be processed, it is necessary for the
cities to forward to this office a check or checks for the total amount
of $8,927.66. This includes 10°Io for contingencies and construction
engineering. ~ .
Yours very truly,
J. R. Stone
District Engineer
~~
+~ ~,
~, ~ ,,~,~,,'.~''v
By: 0. L. Robinson
District Construction
Engineer
JWlch
Attachments
~~^
~-~-,~_- --- Ky..,..
S~'t': ~. .. .may _+..
`` ~.~;#~--~';-.r-N.~'Y'~ arttntnt ei 1{lrh+ra~s
``~ ~. ~ -~Wb~~/1 Trinspott>{tlon
=~ =r= t~rnn llt-Retr.1D•76
.,:.
;:~.~ ~:~
~~f
APPHO~AL OF CHANGE IN PLANS
F. C ReQuest No.....~.....__....-. Accompanied b~ Sketcbes or F. C. Plao-Sbeets I~~umbered .,9A~.~,.,_.~,._,~ Nom. No,j~~~.~4---
rrant
Ta CouictP~ Federal Prof. No. _...~_B~~z. .......•....•-.... ..............._....._.-_., Coatrol_8b.5r2.- -
TDTHE ENGINEER•DIRECTOR:
Approval of the following changes in plans andlor specifications is requested.
Limits: Sta..+3~ ......._ to Sta...11.#~2..._...
Description: Add three 15 Ft. Street Inlets.
This field change is requested for the following reasons: Additional Streets Inlets needed to reduce
ponding until future storm sewer s}stern is constructed. To be paid for by the City of
Richland Hills.
Contractor ~ ~,,:.,~,,,,.., T,• ~ ~ ~ ~..~, ~ r~ ~.,. ,. ~..: ,._ .•,. T_ _
341
34!
40'
46,
46'
471
41:
52.
Itain FIELD CHANCE QUANTITIF.R ORICtyAL PLAN QUANTI?lES
K~ pF~RII'TI4N Untt
Quantity
rentraet
Yrice Amount
Quustity
Coatraet
Pt'la
Amooat
-
I-bb8
A r G Gr 2
TON .~...~5
2 , 398.92 ._._22
27.5 .C
6 ,
9~, 3 o
2
:~
1
~
X44
1 Sew ~b.3! .~Q .. .
.
.~
ZQI.~.. ,.
,, . -
3 P e ~,3 ,
a
i-SQ P ew r 4;?.$~ t
l-826 Inlet Comp (Curb) (15 F , pp ~~
.-577 Rin & v ~~
-540 Conc C ~ I ~ ~~~, ~
i
~ ~~ ..~~~
Tot.t ........... ~.~.. Totat ........... ; l ~ n . n ~ 5.5 n
SVet jlnderrun • • • >I
Rcspc:,rC~u~ reques by:
~Iden ~Ineer Date
...
Date
t~latrlct En~ln~e>' Date
Net overrun • • • • • • .: $ e 16 , ~ 5
Recommended for Approval by:
.........................................................w. _._.._.........._._._.........
CAIt'I Engineer of HIgAx•ay Drcl~n Date
t'>sir! i':nkieert. llt~introot+er l~ ()pentbas Date
Hrldsc Entlnrer Date
.............._.._.__......~..._......... ............. .........~.....................Approved ......_........._................................_..___.
_.._.._
Ea=inner 1~a:titUer Data • Conetruetion Engineer •. • ....-Date -
Verified by _...............:._.........._........ ................._ .............Approved ...................................._................ .._........._~...__.._
Inttiala Dala fntiaeer•Uitrrtat Date
'~()TE: F.i~ht copies of thic Corm must bt sitbmittcd to tht State Dt:partment of }~i~hways and Public transportation Main oRa through the otTkx of the
District Enb:neer for exh field change reauc'sted on Federal Aid Projects exeelx Federal Sea-ndery, and five copies for Gild changes on Sta:e and
Federal Scoondary~ ~'rojccts.
To see Maps with Agenda:
Please contact City
Secretary's Office /
Municipal Records