Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1983-02-14 Agendas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting February 14. 1981_, at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. • NUMBER ITEM _ ACTION TAKEN COUNCIL 7•10 P.M. 1 . Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Consideration of Minutes of the Regular Meytine January 24, 1983 5. Presentation of Ten Year Certificate and Service Pin to Robert Madrid of the Fire Department 6 Presentation of Five Year Certificate nn4 cnnrire Pin rn nc1 Browning of the Tnsprtion Department 7. Presentation of 1981-82 Annual Audit for City of North Richland Hills R PTANNTNG S ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPFAT, HFARTNG - PZ 82-12. Reouest of Tierra Financial, Incorporated, to Rezone Tract 3A. Abstract 321, William Cox Survey from Ag;yculture to Multi- Family (Located at the Northwest Corner of Turner and Davis Boulevard) Page 2 - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting February 14, 1983 _, at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-32 10. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-2,, Request of The Ritz Company for Replat of Lot 7R, Block 2, Meadow Lakes Addition (Located et the Snutheact Corner of Take View Circle) 11. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-3, Request of Hospital Corporation of America for Final Plat of Tot 1 Block E. Calloway Farm Addition (Located on the West Side of Rooth Calloway Road) 17 PTANNTNG & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-3, Request of F. Sam Hudgins to Rezone a Portion of Tract 3A, Wm. Mann Survey from Local Retail to Multi-Family (Located approximately 600 feet East of Rufe Snow Drive and 170 feet South of Hightower Drive) 13. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-3 /42C IS .e�.ce t/ 4. Consideration of Ordinance Amending /002 ��/""" Ordinance No. 195, Subdivision Ordinance- Street Lighting 15. Consideration of Granting an Appeal Hearing 011 P4/82733 - - Page 3 - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Fvr the Meeting February 14, 1983 _, at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN • 1fi Consideration of Granting an Agneal Paring on PZ 83-2 17. Consideration of Granting a Variance From the Sign Ordinance - Racetrac Petroleum 18. Consideration of Accepting Bid for nn,. (1 ) Economy Car - Police Department CID Division 19 Consideration of Awarding Bid for Prewitt Road Waterline 20. Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #1, to Lewis 6 Lewis in the Amount of 59.751.42. Smithfield Acres Sanitary Sewer Project 21. Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #1, to Stolaruk Corporation in the Amount of $94.502.77, North Hills Street and Drainage Project 22. Consideration of Payment to Southwestern Flertrir Company in the Amount of 5211 110 17 Sigpalization of Davis and Main _ 23. Consideration of Partial Payment, Estimate #5, to Austin Road Company in the Amount of $36,977.44 Dawn Drive Project Page 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting Fai,r„AYV 14. 1483 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER - ITEM .: , . ACTION TAKEN 24. Consideration of Extension of Traffic izen Presentation r Earl McKinne McMasters Builders, Incor.orated, 705 Glade Road, Colleyville • • . . . DATE: 2/10/83 . t SUBJECT: Paran~edic Program. DEPARTMENT: Fire BACKGROUND: The 1982-83 budget was approved by the City Council with an appropriation to upgrade aI~u1ance equipment to paramedi~ status, subject to subs~quent final approval taking into account the possibility of a county-wide a~ulance servic~. It now appears that there will be n~ county-wide ambulance service in the in~ediaté future, .so it is proposed to proceed with the budgeted program. '.." . '\! " \J .. lr CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Discussion BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO AÇCOUNT NUMBER: Fire Departnlent ~--~~~-~--~~~--------~-~~~--~--~~---------~-~--~~----~-----~~---~-~-~~~~-~~-~~~ . City of jX8rth Richland Hills, Texas FIRE DEPARTMENT Stan R. Gertz Fir. Chief February 10, 1983 'ro: From: Rodger Lin~, City Manager Stan Gertz, Fire Chief Paramedic Program Ref: Should the city council elect to improve the quality of medical service, there are several points that. need to be established. It is not the intent of this hew program to have a fleet of several ambulances. The fire department will remain at two (2) modular type ænbulances, provided mutual aid contracts with the cities of Richland Hills and Bedford remain current and the population of North Richland Hills remains under 50,000 people. . One ambulance will maintain a reserve status while the other unit is utilized as a first line vehicle. Equipment to be ordered is only to fully equip the first line ambulance. The second line unit would be used only when the first line unit is taken out of service for maintenance or repairs. Equipment and supplies will be transfered from one ambulance to another, thus reducing the equipment cost. It was purposed at this past budget session, the five (5) paramedics would earn an extra one hundred dollars per month for their additional training and skills. The fire department administration has no intent of coming back to council to ask for any additional paramedic positions. The budgeted five par'amedics are all that are needed to provide an advanced life support unit for one first line ambulance. No future plans indicate extra personnel to be hired for the ambulance service. This is not to be construed as no request for personnel will be made in reference to the firefighting division or prevention division. As the city grows so must these other divisions. The ambulance division is supported by two other cities and should not require any growth except for the provisions in paragraph two. . (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118 . . . .The money figures submitted have been verified by the finance department. All equipment listed are the same in name and number as approved by council. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me. Fire Chief SG:ms Attached are a list of equipment and cost, personnel and salary provisions. EQUIPMENT In instituting the Paramedic Program the following equipment j.s budgeted in the present 4IÞbudget and has been approved by Council. ITEM Mast Trousers (cost $1,620) . Laryngoscope (cost $540) Forceps (cost $30) Portable Suction Unit (cost $450) Nitrous Oxide Unit 4IÞ (cost $1,500) First Aid & Drug Boxes (cost $225) E.K.G. Monitor w/Defib Unit (cost $7,000) Traction Splints (cost $600) Misc. Items (cost $1,290) E.M.S. Radio, Bio Phone (cost $7,775) eM. S. Radio (cost $1,560) JUSTIFICATION Inflatable rubber trousers which force blood of the lower extremities to the head and heart area to prevent shock. Establishes airway in unconscious victims. Instrument to remove foreign objects from the throat. Battery operated vacuum unit to remove emmissions from air passages. Places victim or patient in a twilight sleep to reduce pain and prevent shock until arrival at hospital. Units especially designed for this type of medical service and provides security for narcotics. Records heart rhythm and allows paramedic to restart heart due to cardiac arrest. Stabalizes limbs of compound fractures and reduces pain Many other small items that are necessary in support equip. for proper medical care in the field. Portable radio establishes direct radio contract with doctors at hasp. and also allows EKG strip to be transmitted to hospital. Mounted inside the ambulance and establishes contact between emergency room and ambulance in order for proper preparations are made prior to the arrival of ambulance. . The only item which is not budgeted but is funded in revenue shares, is a modular type ambulance which cost approximately $36,000. . Most all items listed are a one time purchase and should last for several years unless it becomes damaged, lost or worn out. PERSONNEL Presently we have five (5) trained paramedics already employed as firefighters. (Four (4) firefighters and one fire lieutenant). These personnel have all the required state training and certification along with practical application. Three paramedics will be assigned to three shifts, with the remaining two paramedics working regular duties until such time they are needed to fill in on the ambulance. The minimum number of paramedics needed are five (5) to insure proper manning of the ambulance, twenty-four hours per day, 365 days a year. The fire lieutenant paramedic will maintain his routine duties in the station as well as riding the ambulance and supervise paramedic personnel and supplies. . SALARY In anticipation of the paramedic program, $1,200 per man, per year was budgeted in addition to their regular salary. This intended salary will place the four fire- fighters/paramedics at approximately the same salary as a fire lieutenant. The fire lieutenant/paramedic salary will be $100 above his fellow lieutenants. . ¡( DATE: February 14. ]9A1 .' . Sli;~JECT:_ Public Works Productivity Study Administration ;; rp /·j1'I1·fENT : Bl\.CKGROUND : Attached is a copy of the pub] it". 'Work~ prnr111f't-;"r;t-y study ;:}nci ~ m~mo sumarizing the contents. /",.J"" ,/As ybu recall, we have appropriated $25,000 in the current bud~et year for ~h~ ..._~~tudy and an. additional $200,000 to implement the recommendations. .//' .\. _._.~..__.._------------- - ~\ . -/~ _._--- -.. ,-,,--.--.-...-..... .....---- --- --------~_..._~._.. \\. ........':...-..---- / -:.....-.--.-.-.--... ~--.------- .¿ 1._ ~.-...-.-...-.. " )!_--------- --- --- -- ------------. ..¡- CiTY COUNCIL liC'[ION H.EQtJIRED: _-Pis.c.u.s.s.ion - Approvp In; ~~rr,..n.v,? ....--------- ---..-..-.....-...- --- ......----.--....,...-..-...--.-.-- . -.. ..........-.... BUDGETED ITFM: YES__X-__._ NO . "'~'.' Ij N ~.r 1'~ Li·lli E R : t:.Q I. - _---.M.. -=-~-------- ( ì ---- - - - -------- ..--. _._-- - ----- .- ..- - -.---------------------------------~_¿.iP!.~--------- . r' . . . . . eity of ~orth W.chland Hills ~tar of the ~etroplex February 8, 1983· Ref: ACMM 0006-83 Memo to: Rodger N. Line City Manager From: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Subject: Public Works Productivity study Attached is a report on the Public Works Productivity study that I was assigned in October. The study encompasses many features such as a field inventory of facilities we are required to maintain, a summary of our current shortcomings in maintenance and several recomn~ndations for improvement. I feel the nlost important recommendation is that of instituting a Con~rehensive Work Managen~nt System. This system is detailed in Annex B and generally contains the following elements: 1. Establishes work standards for our crews 2. Undertakes an annual work program, work and crew calendars, and specific maintenance objectives 3. An effective and workable work order system The cost of in@lementing the proposal is summarized as follows: 1982-83 cost to in~len~nt Recurring expenditures $232,500 (Personllel & Equipment) 53,000 Other options affecting the cost and requiring City Council action are sUI£tIuarized below. l. Improving the riding surface and extending the life of approximately 15 miles of residential streets. I estiI~te that we have in excess of 60 miles of roadway that should be seal coated now. With County participation a first year plan of 15 nliles would cost approximately $100,000. In the event the County callnot support the total l5 nliles, the remail1der should be con~ercially contracted. In the future we should identify and budget for a Inininluln of an additional lS miles per year. I feel this is all iInluediate concern and a justifiable expenditure front our Unrestricted Reserves. (817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. lOOP 820 I P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHlAND HillS" TEXAS 76118 .;L"( . . . ~ 2. Included in the study is a proposal for overlaying four nciles of our worst streets this year and the capability of overlaying an additional 10 miles each subsequent year. The selected streets should be identified and budgeted separately. Again, any budget overrun this year can easily be absorbed. 3. Also included are comments on the. unresolved question of street sweeping. We have apparently failed in our attempt to find a contractor for this naintenance function. If the Council decides that we undertake this task on a regularly scheduled basis, it will be necessary to purchase an additional piece of street sweeping equipment at an estin~ted cost of $58,000. Annexes D & E address this subject. Rodger, I enjoyed the. challenge of doing this study and feel that I have personally gained fronl the experience. It is requested that the study and recommendation be scheduled for consideration by the City Council at an early date so that implementation of the Council's decisions can begin soon. DJn~~' . ..; .." . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . - . ':'~'{~~;~i~{(\:: '; : . '. . riJ.- f Xl: h <iß ,- bland <iIJ~11····..·.··: ~ .·:::..·.::.::~/:.\i~~~+<~.~·:: ~ 1ty 0 eJ j "ort.n1C J:lll S . .......:.:/.:.:\::.:.'/.\?/ Star of the ~etroplex ClI.ertifitate of "ernite THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS TO: ROBERT MADRID IN RECOGNITION OF TEN YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE FIRE DEPARTMENT. TO THE CITY IN THE DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS 24th DAY OF JANUARY 1983 . . ¿ . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ii),. f Xl: th<iß·· Wand <i£Y~11 ... ..:..::.::J:f;~~f!m U Ity 0 ~ ! " or .n1C .£Ill S . ......:.?:::~.::.?~~.~\::~ Star of the'Metroplex OIertifitate of ~erítite THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO: DEL BROWNING IN RECOGNITION OF 'FTVF YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE TO THE CITY IN THE TN~P'R~TTnN DEP ARTMENT. DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS 14~h DAY OF ¡¿ :~~ J1o~ ~ Departn1ent Head . ... ... ..... . . . DATE: 2-14-8~ ~UBJECT: . DEP AR1~ENT : ] 981:-82 A1H=J i t ...Report FinAnce BACKGROUND: 'Prp ~pnt.R t.; nn nf' 1 ~R? ~ -r:)nll~ 1 ~"ð it report ny 'PPR + ~ M~ ,...y; (" k" M; +" n~' , and Company to City Councll. . -- ..-- .----- .._-_...._-----_--...-....~._-_....~---- ----........--.-.~ CITY rOUNCIL ACTION REQUIRRD: ~cçep~An~p £LÜC;[:'J,~ED ITEJ1: YES 'NO -- ---......-.- N/A ·\CCOUNT NUMBER: ____-M-ð.,------ ____ --------------------_._-------------------------------------~~--~~---------- . .1 DATE: February 10~ 1983 SUBJECT: . .. Appeal Hearing for PI 82-32 Zoning Request from Agriculture to Multi-Famil~ on Tract 3Ä, Wm. Cox Survey~ Abstract 321. BACKGROUND: Plann.ing and· Zoninq This property is located at the northwest corner of Turner Drive and DEPARTMENT: Davis Blvd. . . There were 35 property owners contacted and two spoke in opposition to this request. .. The Planning and Zoning tomn;ss;on denied this requ,est with a vote of 4-1 .wi.th Mr. Hannon voting against denial. A request for an appeal' hearing was granted January 24, 1983 and a date of February 14th ·was set for the hearing. . CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approval or Denial BUDGETED ITEM: . YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ----~--~--~-~-~~-~-~---~---~~~---~-~----~~~~~~----~~~-~--~~-~~~-~-~~~-~~~~--~~~~~-~---~~~- . Page 4 p & Z Minutes December 21, 1982 c:'. 4. " '\ ',' '~. ~.'~ 5. 6. . PS 82-65 APPROVED PS 82-66 PS 82-66 APPROVED PS 82-67 APPROVED PZ 82-32 Mr. Hannon asked about the drainage ditch. Mr. Long said they would maintain i since it would be privately owne4 Mr. Bronstad said let them ma·'tain it. ,-t.' Ms. Nash said she would 1· ;e to amend her previous motion to incl, 'e "approval subject to the Engin~ "s conrnents~'. -4' This motion was s~ onded by Mr. Hannon and the motion J/rried 5-0. A /..... Request of /. "BM Partnership for preliminary plat of L 1, Block 2, Castle Winds Addn. Owen. . Long, Consulting Engineer, came for 'rd. He said they had received the G~y Engineer's comments and have submitted - rebuttle letter. Mr. long said they can comply with the City Engineer's comments.' Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 82-66 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded- by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Cross Roads Development Company for preliminary plat of Block 8-R, Snow Heights North Addition. John Cook, General Partner of Cross Roads Development Company, came forward. He said they had received the City Engineer's comments and take no exception to them. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 82-67 subject to the City Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Tierra Financial, Inc. to rezone Tract 3A, Abstract 321t William Cox Survey, · from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of Multi-Family. This property is located at the Northwest corner of Turner Drive and Davis Blvd. ~. C~ .r4Þ ''-- ." . \ Page 5 p & Z Minutes December 21, 198~ John Cook came forward in the absence of Delbert Stembridge who was to represent Tierra Financial, Inc. He said due to the location of the property and thé shape of the land, they felt Multi-Family zoning would be the best use for this land. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing· and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. - David Payne, 6983 Cox Lane, came forward. He stated that the traffic on Davis Blvd. was alreädy congested and where Turner .~ Drive comes into Davis Blvd., there would have to be a traffic light because of the traffic problem apartments would generate. Mr. payne said he has had sewer problems and had won a $10,000 settlement. He said if apartments come~ in there, it would only add to the sewer problems. Mr. Payne said it is residential zoning on all sides of this property and he feels the Multi-Family zoning would create both sewer and traffic problems. He said that Smithfield Elementary School has been enlarged to accomodate the number of school children and he doesn't see how this zoning could be in the best interest of the city or the homeowners. John Larriviere, 6971 Cox Lane, came forward. He said he was not sure if Turner Drive could handle the additional traffic this zoning would generate. Mr. Larriviere said Turner Drive had just been resurfaced. He said it is a very narrow street and he did not feel it could handle the traffic; there would be congestion. Mr. larriviere said he had been lucky because he had not had any sewer problems, but his neighbors on both sides of him had sewer problems. c. n. ~. ;. \, Page 6 p & Z Minutes December 21, 1982 " .¡ Mr, t{ood asked \-/hat ne would suggest to do with this property. ' Mr. larriviere said he understands they want the highest us'e for this property, but if they don't do an~improvements, he would not be for this zoning change. Mr. Payne said this property is further north of the improvements to Davis Blvd. He said they have an unbelieveable amount of traffic on Davis Blvd. Mr. Payne said he felt this zoning would lower their . property value and the sewer in that area could not handle Multi-Family zoning. He said he would go along with Single Family zoning or duplex zoning. Mr. Bowen said all the Commission is considering is the best use of the land. Mr. Hannon sai"d there would be approximately 240 apar~ments. . . Chairman Tucker said the developer would have to go through the platting process and if there was a drainage problem or a water or sewer problem, they would be required to make it ~dequate. ' Mr. Tucker said the traffic would be a problem. The Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood asked if there were any improve- ments to be made on Davis Blve. Mr. Bronstad said that would be up to the State since it is a State highway. Mr. Tucker asked about Turner Drive. Mr. Bronstad said he was not sure if Turner Drive was listed in the bond program. Mr. Hannon made a motion to approve PZ 82-32 as requested. - This motion died for lack of a second. ' Page 7 P & Z Minutes December 21, 1982 /-: \-. PZ 82-32 DENIED 7. PZ 82-34 POSTPONED 8. PZ 82-34 re '--- Mr. Bowen made the motion to deny PZ 82-32. Thi s moti on was· seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion to deny carried 4-1 with Mr. Hannon voting against denial. Request of Alco Development Company to rezone a portion of Tract 6, Abstract 953, Mahala Lynch Survey, from its prese classification of IF-12-0ne Family Dwellings to a proposed ëlassificatio of 2F-9-Two Family Dwellings. This property is located 117 feet ast of Tourist Drive and approximat y 150 . feet South of Bewley Street. The Chairman stated this ~ quest has been postponed until January ,1983. effries to rezone Tracts 18 & IBl, tract 145, William D. Barnes Surveï from their present classification f Agriculture to a proposed cIa ification of IF-9-0nè Family Dwe ings. This· pro rty is located on the East side of Smi field Road at the intersection of Ever een Avenue and Smithfield Road. . est Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer, came orward to represent Mr. Jeffries. He stated they feel that IF-9 zoning would conform to the area since Kingswood Estates to the West and Crestwood Estates to the Southeast were both IF-9 zoning. Mr. Hedgcoth said Mr. Jeffries plans to construct a cul de sac of 17 lots. He said the 4.9 acres would provide to the local builders the development of Single Family homes. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Glynn Blair, 7709 Evergreen Avenue, came forward. He asked if IF-9 zoning would allow rental property or would it be privately owned. Mr. Tucker said it would be for single fami 1 y homes. . . . KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas December 13, 1982 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PS 82-32, AG TO M.F., (GRID 61) We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. , RWA/l jc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works SSO FrRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 STARNES p Z- J';¿-.3~ 13.907 ACRE TRACT OUT OF THE WM. COX SURVEY, ASST. 321 TARRANT COUNTY, TeXAS . c oCt o IX C -l LtJ ¡¡: :J: t: ~ V VICINITY MAP N.T.S. --l -- I 5870 ¡'2' 45 "E 9//.33' ----- -- . 10 '0 .0 (0 ~ I --~I "0 W) --..... 10 o ~ <I) ~~. ~~"i, ~þ.~ Q o· ~~~ 2 3 - "- <\I Z I~ 0 E 4 I~ 0 0 ..... « r- 5 13.907 AC. / ," ,'" (f) ...IJJ W +W- -- Ìo Z 15 u --:: «<t600 ...J 0 -' ci CD It 1\ 1~~· ,~ ,,' o \1 S 6\ , <v ,f) o..O~ tþ.\~: ,.. ~<v~O~· -<...J ~':JÒ ~. >-0 a:::...J Lù ~ 7 3:~ 0_ .-J::E t/) 8 9 III: 200' SCALE: I ~-- . 10 , , METES and BOUNDS · BEING all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the WM. COX SURVEY, A-321, Tarrant County, Texas, a part of Fred O. Barney Tract as recorded in Volume 1916, Page 254, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a steel rod in the Northerly R. O. W. line of Turner Road and the Southeast corner Lot 10, Block 7, Smithfield Acres Addition as recorded irl Volume 388-2, Page 132, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; T!-I ENe E Nor t h 3· d e g r e e sOl m i nut e 1 5 see 0 n d sEa s t wit h E a s t line said Smithfield Acres, a distance of 1042.27 feet to a steel rod for corner, being the Northeast corner of said SIn i t h fie 1 d A ere s, 3 0 ~ 0 fee t Nor t h 3 de g r e e sOl III i nut e s 1 5 seconds East from the Northeast corner Lot 1, Block 7, S nl i t h fie 1 d A ere s ; THENCE South 87 degrees 12 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 911.33 feet to a steel rod for corner; said point being the Northwest corner of Fred O. Barney> Jr. tract as recorded in Volume 3594, Page 100, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; · THENCE South 2 degrees 51 [TIinutes 30 seconds West, with West line of said Fred 0 Barney, Jr. tract, <1 distance of 365.55 feet to a steel rod for corner in Northerly R. O. w~ line of Turner Road; said point being North 2 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds East, 37.45 feet from the SOLlthwest corner said Fred (). Bar n e y, Jr. t r act ; rrHENCE South 61 degrees 17 [ninutes West, \vith said Northerly l-\. o. t..J. 1 i n e, a d i s tan ceo f 7 3 3 . 7 1 fee L t 0 a s tee 1. rod, a n angle point in said R. o. W. rr II ENe E Sou t h 4 7 de g r e e s 2 4 In i nut e s 1 0 see 0 I1 d s W est, wit h s aid Northerly R. O. W. line, a distance of 412.15 feet to the p lac e 0 f beg inn i n g and con t a i n i n g 1 3 . 9 Ü Î (J ere S 0 f 1 a [1 d, 1110 r e or less, · . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ,ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS., SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179. ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLSt TEXASs PASSED. APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1961s AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: . RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 82-32 rezoned from AQricul tLÌr"e . . Multi-Family " the followi"~ng descri'bed property shall , "'. " .' , . ,. ..." . ,to .. ... " l, . BEING all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Wm. Cox Survey, Abstract 321, Tarrant County, Texas, a part of Fred O. Barney Tract as recorded in Volume 1916, Page 254, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes, and bounds as follows: . BEGINNING at a steel rod in the Northerly R.O.W. line of Turner Road and the Southeast corner of Lot 10, Block 7, Smithfield Acres Addition, as recorded in Volume 388-2, Page 132, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 3 degrees 01 minutes 15 seconds East with East line said Smithfield Acres, a distance of 1042.27 feet to a steel rod for corner, being the Northeast corner of said Smithfield Acres, 30.0 feet North 3 degrees 01 minutes 15 seconds East from the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 7, Smithfield Acres; THENCE South 87 degrees 12 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of ~11.33 feet to a steel rod for corner; said point being the Northwest corner of Fred O. Barney, Jr. tract as recorded in Volume 3594, Page 100, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 2 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds West, with West line of said Fred O. Barney, Jr. tract, a distance of 365.55 feet to a steel rod for corner in the Northerly R.O.W. line of Turner Road; said point being North 2 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds East, 37.45 feet from the Southwest corner of said Fred O. Barney, Jr. tract; THENCE South 61 degrees 17 minutes West, with said Northerly R.O.W. line, a distance of 733.71 feet to a steel rod, an angle point in said R.O.W.; THENCE South 47 degrees 24 minutes 10 seconds West, with said Northerly R.O.W. line, a distance of 412.15 feet to the place of beginning and containing 13.907 acres of land, more or less. . . . . : íå eity of ~orth 1tÏcWand Hills _\{~ -C---7l'l~ Star of the ~etroplex ~ TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PS 83-2 APPROVED PS 83-3 APPROVED Rodger Line Ci ty Manager Wanda Ca 1 vert Planning & Zoning Coordinator Platting & Zoning cases for City Council Feb. 14, 1983 DATE: Feb. 10, 1983 Request of The Ritz Company for replat of Lot 7R, Block 2, Meadow Lakes Addn. Request of Hospital Corp. of America for final plat of Lot 1, Block E, Calloway Farm Addition~ Request of F. Sam Hudgins to rezone a portion of Tract 3A, Wm. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present classi- ficat:ion of kocal.:-Retail to a proposed classification of Multi-Family. This property is located approximately 600 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive and 170 feet south of Hightower Drive.. Consideration of an amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance regarding street lights. PZ 83-3 APPROVED (3 were contacted) ~1ENDMENT ·TO SUBDIVISION ORÐINANCE #195 APPROV ED (817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH RICHLAND H!LLS, TEXAS 76118 To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records ! DATE: February 10, 1983 ¡ I I .. · SUBJECT:. . PS 83-2 Replat of Lot 7R, Block 2, Meadow Lakes Addition - DEPARTMENT: Planning, and Zoning - BACKGROUND: This property is located at the southeast corner of Lake View Circle. Dave Ritz wa'nts to build a 'large house so he is requesting to take two smá'll lots and make one large lot. . . , . All Enqineer1s comments haVE been met. The Planning and Zoninq COI111 ission .recommended approval of this replat · · CITY COUNCIL AC':t'ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat. BUDGETED ITEM: . YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/.l\ ...¿J~ Q~ ---~---~--~~--~~-~-~~~~--~-~-~-~~~-~----~~~~~~--~~--~~~~~-~----~-~~-~-~--~-~--~--~~----~-- · - - I ,. ( / \ MlNU ES OF THE, REGULAR MEETING OF' THE PLANNING AND ZONING CO~~ISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS JANU RY 27, 1983 - 7:30 P. M. c. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PS 83-2 (~. PS 83-2 APPROVED . 2. PS 83-3 The meeting was called to order by t Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:4 PRESENT: CHAIR.~AN SECRETARY MEMBER eorge Tucker Marjorie Nash Don Bowen Mark Hannon Mark Wood John Schwinger A 11 en Brons tad \~a nda Ca 1 vert AL T. MEMBER ASST. DIR. PW/U P & Z COOR~INATOR Ms. Nash made the motion to approve the 'minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of The Ritz Company for replat of Lot 7R, Block 2, Meadow Lakes Addition. . .. . -. Dave Ritz came forward. He said all he wanted to do was replat Lots 7 and 8 into one large lot for a single family home. The Chairman said since this ;s a replat in single family zoning, there must be a Public Hearing. He opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 83-2 as requested. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of . lca for of Lot 1, Block E, Calloway Fann Addition. .. . . . , '" /" \..... (.. ~-, KNOW TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING NCINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas January 10, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Ric land Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 82 North Rich1and Hi 1s, Texas 76118 Re: 3-912, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, MEADOW LAKES ADDN.t LOT 7R, BK. 2, PS 83-2, REPLAT, GRID 120 We have reviewed he referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the fol lowing "com ents: 1. Utility comp nies should be advised of the proposed replat. 2. The address 3. The current owner should be noted on the plat. (MF) should be noted on the plat. Should you have a y questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. .~ RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Ridd e, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bro stad, Assistant Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BL G.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 r ~~ r¡ II DATE: February 10, 1983 . SUBJECT:. . PS 83-3 Final Pld.t of Lot 1, Block E, Calloway Farm Addition - DEPARTMENT: Planning ,.and ~oning. - BACKGROUND: This property is located on the west side of Booth Calloway Road. It is . ' the site of the new proposèd hospital. , . The Hospital Corporation of America has agreed to the Engineer's comments. , ' .- The Planning and Zoning Comnission recommended appr.oval of this final pl'at s,ubject to the Engineer's corrments and subject to ,the developer providing the city with separate instrument easements of no Jess than 10 feet wide for water and sewer service for this site. . CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approval ,or denial of final, plat. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/ A ~~ (!~ --~~~-~-~-~-~~~-~~-~~--~-~-~-~-~~--~-~--~~~~~~-~--~~~~~~~-~~--~-~-~~-~--~---~~-------~-~--~ . - - ( \ >," c C·· MI TES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF" THE PLA NING AND ZONING CO~~ISSION OF THE CIT OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS JA ARY 27, 1983 - 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: CHAIR.~AN SECRETARY MEMBERS George Tucke Marjorie N Don Bowe Mark H on Mark od Jo Schwi nger en Brons tad ~a nda Ca 1 vert CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:40 P. M. ~ '- AL T. MEMBER ASST. D IR. P~l/U P & Z COORDINATOR CONSIDERATION OF THE MI TES OF DECEMBER 21, 1982 motion to approve the minutes as wr· en. This motion was . Wood and the motion 1. I PS 83-2 of The Ritz Company for replat 7R, Block 2, Meadow Lakes Addition. ve Ritz came forward. He said all he wanted to do was replat Lots 7 and 8 into one large lot for a single family home. The Chairman said since this is a replat in single family zoning, there must be a Public Hearing. He opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. PS 83-2 APPROV ED There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 83-2 as requested. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. . 2. PS 83-3 Request of Hospital Corp. of America for final plat of Lot 1, Block E, Calloway Fann Addition. Page 2 P & Z Minutes January 27,' 1983 ( { c. .~ PS 83-3 APPROVED 3. PS 83-4 c David Brehm¡ Kevin Tucker & Associates, came forward to represent the hospital in its request. He stated he had sent a letter to the city saying they agreed to the City Engineer's comments. Mr. Hannon said on/the plat it showed proposed relocation of utilfty easements. He said he would request the definite location of these easement be found and put on the plat prior to going to the City Council. Mr. Brehm said they would like to wait and file the water and sewer easements when they start construction so they can be sure they are in the right place. He said they could vary two feet one way or another. Mr. Brehm said he had discussed this with Mr. Albin, the City Engineer, and he did not feel it would be a problem. Mr. Hannon asked Mr. Bronstad if this would be satisfac·tory with him and if he needed a 15 ft. or a 10 ft. easement. Mr. Bronstad said that would be fine with him and they had to have at least 10 ft. for an easement, but he would ·take 15 ft. if they wanted to give it. Mr. Hannon made a motion to approve PS 83-3 subject to the Engineer's comments and subject to the developer providing the City with separate instrument easements of no less than 10 feet wide for water and sewer service for this site. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Aubrey Brothers for prel· · plat of Flamingo Estates. Dick Perkins, all and Perkins, came forward 'resent Mr. Brothers. He said aâ received the City Engineer's comments and they agree to all of them with· the exception of item #1 regarding the name of the subdivision. Mr. Perkins said Mr. Brothers feels he needs some name that would catch your eye and he would prefer Flamingo Estates. . \. . . . January 25, 1983 (~- ( kevin tucker and associates, p.c. s te planners · landscape architects. recreation planners. engineers 2112 blair boulevard / nashville. tennessee 372 t 2 / 615-269-5608 Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Co rdinator City of North Richland Hills, Texas 7301 Northeast Loop 82 North Richland Hills, X 76118 Dear Ms. Calvert, The following is in Planning and Zoning Co referenced property. 1. RE: Callaway Farm Addition Lot 1, Block E Final Plat KTA 1182194 esponse to a letter from Richard Albin to the ission dated January 10, 1983 concerning the above The plat proposes a 120' wide drainage easement along the Callaway Branch. It is the intention of the developer to provide at this time the channelizatio for this drainage conveyance channel and dedicate the channel to the City of North Richland Hills for maintenance. 2. A copy of the dr inage report and proposed channelization has been submitted to the Fort Worth district Corp of Engineers for their review. They h d no objections to the study and proposed channelization, a d indicated that they will use it in their study updating the flood insurance study for North Richland Hills. 3. The Mobile Pipe L ·ne Company has been notified with copies of the proposed channelization. They are in the process of reviewing the proposed plans an are scheduled to respond to the channelization during the week of January 31, 1983. 4. The fire hydrant coverage is proposed for the hospital site as indicated by the f nal plat. No development is proposed at this time for the southern portion of the property. At the time the deve~opment is proposed for the southern area all development codes will be complied w the 5. The water and sew r pro rata requirements will be fulfilled at the proper time for th development of the hospital. 6. Two additional ga e valves have been provided on the proposed 8" water lines at the r junction near sanitary sewer manhole #2 as shown on page P 1.2. . . e Page two Ms. Calvert letter January 25, 1983 f ( \ I, (" ) Your assistance in hel ing us prepare these drawings has been appreciated. We plan on attending t e Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on January 27, 1983 to add any ad itional information or answer any questions. David R. Brehm Director of Site Ilk Roy . Dale Direc 0 of Engineering cc: Roger N. Line, Ci y Manager of North Richland Hills Gene Riddle, Dire tor of Public Works Allen Bronstad, A sistant Director of Public Works John Black, Gould Turner Group Jim Saylor, G1env ew Hospital Byron Hall, Hospi a1 Corporation of America ¡ . . . C· c KNOW TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING NGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas January 10, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 82 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-910, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CALLOWAY FARM ADDN., LOT 1, BK. E, FINAL PLAT, PS 83-3, GRID 141 We have reviewed t e referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comm nts: 1. The plat incl des a proposed 120-foot wide drainage easement along the Calloway ranch within the platted area as we requested. How- ever, we understand that the developer is not proposing any improve- ments to the alloway Branch Channel at this time since the proposed finished floor elevation of the "hospital building will be over the required mini urn IS-inches above the 100-year flood plain, based on existing chan el conditions. Although the building will be con- structed abov the IOO-year flood plain, the limits of the flood 'plain fall ou side the proposed 120-foot wide easement, if-no channel improvements re made. Therefore, we would recommend that the City of North Rich and Hills not accept dedication or responsibility for maintenance 0 the 120-foot wide drainage easement until the developer improves the hanne1 as required to contain the 100-year flood plain within the 1; its of the easement. Furthermore, if the developer does not prop se to improve the channel at this time, then the limits of the lOO-ye r flood plain, based on unimproved channel conditions, should also b shown on the plat, as computed by the developer's engineer, and construction within the platted area should be confined to the area 0 tside the flood plain limits as prescribed in the City's "Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance". 2. A copy of the drainage report prepared by the developer's engineer, . which shows t e effects of the proposed channel improvements on the Calloway Bran h flood plain, should be submitted to the Ft. Worth District Corp of Engineers for review and to assist their office in preparatio of the Flood Insurance Study update for North Richland Hi 11 s. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BL G. - BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 - 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367 (" . ~. ( . Page 2, Planning Zoning, January 10, 1983 . 3. The develope has been in contact with Mobil Pipe Line Company and their requir ments are outlined in a letter to Kevin Tucker and Associates d ted October 13, 1982. No adjustments to the two (2) gas pipeline which cross the Calloway Branch Channel within the proposed pla ted area will be required unless channel improvements are made. A proval from Mobil Pipe Line Company will be required at such time that channel improvements construction is performed; and pipeline encasement or relocation operations may be required. We would rec mend that the City require the developer to pay for any costs in olved in protecting the Mobil pipelines at such time that future hannel improvements are made, since the property owner will directl benefit from .the recovered flood plain area after the channel impr vements are implemented. 4. Since fire h drant coverage protection is not being provided for the south po ticn of the plat at this time, building permits for construction in the south area should not be granted until such coverage is rovided. 5. We would refer you to our comments regarding water and sewer pro .rata requirements in our letter dated October 14, 1982. 6. Two (2) additional gate valves should be provided on the proposed a-inch water ines at their junction near sanitary sewer manhole no. 2 as show on page Pl.2. Should you have an questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesi ate to call. . RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Ridd e, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bra stad, Assistant Director of Public Works , . . . tI ( (.' KNOWL ON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING NGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas October 14, 1982 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-910, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CALLOWAY FARM ADDN., LOT 1, BLOCK E, PRELIMINARY PLANS, PS 82-52 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comm nts: 1. We would note that the planning materials submitted to us for review do not includ a detailed drainage study as required to show the Developer1s p oposed improvements to the Calloway Branch Channel, therefore we annot comment on drainage considerations at this time. We would indi ate, however, that the Developer should dedicate a drainage easm nt along the Calloway Branch whose width will be deter- mined by the roposed improved channel top dimension plus 20 feet. This easement should, of course, be shown on the plat. 2. The tax offic should be consulted regarding the proper lot and block' numbers to as ;9n to the parcels included in this platting. 3. Written penni sion should be obtained from Mobil Pipe Line Company for any canst uction within this development which would affect their facilit-es. 4. We would note that fire hydrant coverage protection is being provided for the Hospi al site area itself but the remainder of the proposed platted area -s not adquately covered. 5. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the 'existing 16-; ch water line which fronts this property in Booth Calloway Road Based on an 8-inch equivalent water line requirement to serve this plat, we would estimate pro rata at $11.00 per linear foot for a to al length of 1,950.46 feet. SSO FIRST STATE BANK BL G.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. M~TRO/267.3367 . . . t' c...· ;" \ (" ..I Page 2, Planning Zoning Commission, October 14, 1982 6. The Develope should also be required to pay his pro rata share of the existing 27-inch sanitary sewer which crosses this property. Based on an quivalent 8-inch sanitary sewer line requirement to serve this plat, we would estimate pro rata at $11.00 per linear foot for an stimated total length of 1,800 feet. Should you have an questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/l j c cc: Mr. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Ridd e, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen.Bra stad, Assistant Director of Public Works . . . , . (0 ! ... tuctsr and ossoQates. p.c. ... pt:n'4r' " ~OØI ~~.! _. ~ OÍGnf'en .-w;~t 2.12 btaI'~. JIo. ta. ~ I_~- )1212 Mobil Pipe Line RECEIVE OCT 19 1982 .i 81: ¡::J , - . ': ~ /' O FILE L-;; ,,-:/Þ . · .. r õ ISo" ~ o CORRE~' Octcber H CP~1RACT d RESOURCE o llBRARt DOO~ Mr. Jeff Heinze Kevin Tucker and As 2112 Blair Blvd. Nashville, 'IN 73212 RE: GLENVIEW IDSPITAL TARmn' a:xJNrY, 'lEXAS YOUR JOB NO. 82194 CBC-462 and RC-187 Dear Mr. Heinze: In reference to the s ject project, our review of the plans indicates no adjust.1Tent is to our pipelines provided no grading or dirt. \\Ork is done within 0 easem:nt. Since the aIrOunt of <x>ver over our pipelines varies thro t1ú.s area, we requeSt -:that no heavy equiprent be allowe:l over our 0 pi lines during the oonstJ;uction of the hospital 0 to prevent any acci darrage to our lines. Please rontact Mr. S. . Ross, Sr. Field Foreman at Corsicana, Texas, telephone (214) 874-84 1, before any oonstruction is begun an or néar our pipeline easerœnt. "Should you require · tional infoJ:IIBtion, please advise. FJC:hrv Yours very truly, Çj-q. r;;tu~~ F. J. Christopher Right of Way Specialist cc: J. A. Tel?- Eyck s. B. Ross , .~ .-- . DATE: February 10, 1983 J{þ . SUBJECT:. . PZ 83-3 Zoning ~equest on a portion of Tract 3A, Wm. Mann Survey. Abstract 1010, from- Local Retail to Multi-Family - DEPARTMENT: Planninq and Z:>ninq . - BACKGROUND: This property is located approximately 600 feet east of Rufe Snow and 170 feet south of Hightower Driie. " There were three property owners contacted and no one appeared to contest the request. . ' The Sam Hudgins family own dpproximately 34 acres in this tract, but are" a.sk.ing for only approximately 15~ acres to be chang.ed from Local Retail to Multi-Family. The Planning and Zonina Comnission recommended approval of this zoning 'request. . CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED Approval or denial of zonina request. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ------------------~--------_._------------------------------------------------------------- - - .. Page 11 p & Z Minutes January 27, 1983 ( ( (e (-. "- and spiritually, in opposing this, request. Chairman Tucker closed Hearing. Mr. Wood asked if it moved the front d to make the store fall within th etter of the law. He said while t might be true, he did not feel was the intent of the law. Mr. W said regardless where the door is e location of the store is the me as in previous requests when it was denied, and moving a door does not correct the problem. PZ 83-2 DENIED Mr. Hannon said the Commission is dealing with two laws. the State law which can not issue a permit if they are within the 300 ft. distance, and the City Ordinance which is used as a guideline. and neither say just because it· is 300 feet or more away they would b~ granted a permit. Mr. Wood made the motion to deny PZ 83-2. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 8. PZ 83-3 Request of F. Sam Hudgins to rezone a portion of Tract 3A, Wm. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present classi- fication of Local.Retail to a proposed classification of Multi-Family. This property is located approximately 600 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive and 170 feet south of Hightower Drive. Larry Gill, 4560 Beltline Rd., Dallas, came forward to represent the Sam Hudgins family who has owned this property for 29 years. He said the potential purchaser of this property, contiDgent on getting this zoning, ;s Mr. Bob Lata who has been a builder for 15 years. Mr. Gill said Mr. Lata has moved to this area about 18 months ago and he is presently building in the Dallas/Arlington area and in Midland, Texas. . Page 12 P & Z Minutes January 27, 1983 c-. re "- . ( (' Mr. Gill said this property is located at the southeast corner of Hightower Drive and Rufe Snow Road. He said the "total property owned by Mr. Hudgins is approximately· 34 acres, but they are only requesting a portion of this tract be changed ~ram Local Retäil to Multi- Family zoning, approximately 15~ acres. Mr. Gill said this 15~ acres is the eastern portion of the tract. He said they do not feel there is a market for all the 34 acres as retail. Mr. Gill said they anticipate single family to border their property on the east and south and the Multi-Family zoning would serve as a buffer between the Single Family and Local Retail property along Rufe Snow and Hightower. He said they anticipate having in the Local Retail area a shopping center and office type buildings. Mr. Gill said they do have water avail- able and they will bring the sewer up from ~he south and_ east and in doing so, make it available for some 200 acres of vacant. lane for additional development. Mr. Gill said as far as ingres$-egress of vehicles generated by this site, they plan a street to come off Rufe Snow and go north to Hightower Drive. He said in doing this, it would keep the traffic out of the residential areas. Mr. Gill said with the allowed 19 units per acre, he figures there would be approximately 300 units for this area, which would possibly mean 150 to 190 children living in this complex, but not all would be school age. Mr. Gill said the present owner and the potential buyer of this property are here if the Commission wishes to ask them any questions. Chairman Tucker asked if the Local Retail would wrap around the area that borders Rufe Snow and Hightower. Mr. Gill said that was correct. Page 13 p & Z Minutes January 27, 1983 c. ~ '- : PZ 83-3 APPROVED RECESS BACK TO ORDER 9. PZ 83-4 . ( Mr. Wood asked if they are purchasing the entire 34 acres. Mr. Gill said they were. He said Mr. Lato was ready to purchase this property in early December when the Multi-Family was pulled out of the Local Retail zoning. Mr. Hannon asked if they had a land plan for the 34 acres. Mr. Gill said all they have at present is the plat showing the street. He said they anticipate having office space and retail space including a major grocery store. Ms. Nash asked what type retail was planned for the north section. Mr. Gill said it would be some type of office space ~hich would serve as a buffer. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and cå11ed for those -wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 83-3. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. The Chairman called a recess at 8:5 The Chairman called t 1ng back to order at 9:00 P ,th the same members present. equest of Gary Miller, Miller of Texas, to rezone Lot 2, Block 32, & Lot 1, Block ' 33, Holiday North Addition, Section 7, from their present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Multi-Family. ,I . . . ( KNOW TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING NGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas January 10, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Ric land Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 82 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-3, L.R. TO M.F. GRID 67 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequatel locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Ridd e, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BL G. - BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367 . .. . A I;:; ORDINANCE· NO. i () IJ 3 AN ,ORDI' CE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH· ART.JCLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS. ' SEÇTION ,OF ORDINANCE 1179, ION,ING ORDINANCE Of ntE ,CITY· OF· NORTH' RfCHLAND HILLS" TEXAS, . PASSED, PROVED. AND ADOPTE·D.. BY THE'·pt.ANNING AND ZONl ,COIt1ISSrON AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF: ·THE CITY, F ,NORTH. RÌCHLAHD HILL$. NOVEÞBER 13, 1967. AS NDED'JANUARY,27.1975, . ' 'AFTER APP~RIATE NOTI 'E AND PUS'LIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECCMENDATION IS SUBM'ITTED . TO THE CITY UNCI-L' OF THE CITY OF NORTK RÌCHLANo KILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONINGC ISSION:, .' ." ' , . , RESOLVED that on Case . PZ . 83-"3 the fol1owt.ng descrtbf!d property shll". be rezoned fr Local 'Reta"il ' '.,.: .' , . . ,. ',' . , ." . ': . . . · ,'::" . ··t. ; - F mil ' ' . , , . , . . . . . . , .' · , , '. '.: ' . , . , . . , . . . , . . . . , · . . , ,,' , Commencing at a post in -the 'South line of County Road '#3051 a distance of 1167.0 feet South 89 de rees 45 minutes East and 25.0 feet South 0 degrees 08 minutes East from· the N rthwest corner 6f the W. L. Mann and the Southwest · corner of the J. Condra Surveys in 'TarrantCountYt Texas an iron ,bears North o degrees 08 miriutes We t 1.1 feet said point being 25.1 feet South' degrees 08 minutes West from th Nort~¡est corner of a 37 ..11 acres tract of land as shown in Vol ume 4204., P ge ll",Deed Records. of Tarrant County, Texas. THENCE South 0 degrees 8 minutes East with the West line of said tract and fence linè ,170.0 feet t the point of beginning; , THENCE South 0 degrees 8 minutes East a distance of 1,151.1 feet to a point for corner; . THENCE South 89 degrees 47 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 600 feet to a point for corner; , THENCE N'orth 0 degrees 08 minutes West a distance of 1t151.0 feet to a point for corner; . ' THENCE North 89 degrees 47 minutes 51 seconds East a distance of 600 feet to the. point of beginning and containing 15.85 acres of land, more or less. DATE: 2-10':"83 ~ , .. . . f/JUBJECT :. Street Lighting Ordinance - DEP ARTMENT : Public. Works BACKGROUND: On December l4, 1982, City Council directed the staff tp prepare a proposed ordinance règulating the irtstallation of street lighting in new sections of the City by amending the sub-division ordinance. The Council asked for a xecommendation concerning mid-block lighting on longer streets. Prevailing piatting practice in North Richland . . . . . 0 Hills, as well as specifications in Arlington, Bedford, Eule~s, Haltom City' and Hurst o' have been reviewed and it is recommended that mid~block lights be requireä f~r streets 600 feet and longer, and on ~ ul-de-sacs of 400 feet and l.onger. Enactment of this proposed ordinance should obviate .the future need for the City to install lighting-- in rec~lt1y completed sub-divisions, as we did in 1982 at a cost qf 0$22,000. The enclosed or(linance was presented to the Planning & Zoning Commission ~or their consideration. ThEY recommended passage of this ordinance with the following change in B-5 "400 feet to 300 feet". I ta,lked to a few o"f the members later and .-... .---...... explained that 400 feet ocreated a 200 foot radius coverage of light which °is better ..- coverage than 600 foot spacirg on blocks on non cul~de-sac streets. If we spacè .the lights any closer together, jt will put an extra strain on our street light budget. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ADDroval is recommended of tee attached ordinance arnendin~ th~ sub-division ordinance (#195) to require street li~hti~~~ new sub-divisions. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NI A NO AC :CtUN1~ 1':Ll·iBER: ---'--'--..-- If77r1J /J -----------------------------~-~------~--------------------------- . - ~ Page 35 P & ~Z Minutes' . January 27, 1983 (. ./-. ~ a....._."._ 16. CONSIDERATION OF N AMENDMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION ORD. 195 . in a previous meeting and also was published in the Star Telegram that . these apartments would overcr~ld our schools; we would need more medical facilities, more police and fire 0- tection, and more roads. Mr. · bert said apartment revenue does n cover the expenses of providing c· y services. He said this problem was so addressed by Councilman Ramsey wh stated we had 5 major drug busts in e city and all had been in apartme Mr. Gilbert sa; 7 f for some reason you grant this zo 9 request, he would request the two acc 'roads on the south side of Holida est Addition be blocked 50 none of ~ is traffic could enter their 5ubd iv eli on. Th Chairman closed the Public Hearing. r. Wood said he would like to state that up until about 30 days ago, Multi-Family was allowed in Local Retail zoning and apartments could have been built there, and the developers are being penalized. He said this. is a unique piece of property in that it does not only affect the homeowners around it, but it affects half of North Richland Hills because of the feeders on and off the freeway and the Commission must take all this into consideration. Mr. Bowen made the motion to deny PZ 83-7. This motion \~S seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Hannon voting against denial. The Chairman called a recess at 11:05 P. M. The Chairman called the meeting back to order at 11:10 P. M. with the same members present. Chairman Tucker read the proposed amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance #195: "AMENDING ORDINANCE 195, BY ADDING SECTION 2-06 STREET LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SUB- DIVISIONS - BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Page 36 P &~Z Minutes ~ January 27, 1983 ( .- ' ( l,. TEXAS, that: On and after the date of this ordinance the following shall prevail: A. Street lights in all sub-divisions shall be installed on approved metal poles. 1. Poles must be approved by TESCO and the Director of PW. 2. Poles shall be contracted and paid for by the developer during the construction phase of a sub-division and before building permits are issued. 3. Poles not purchased through TESCO shall be certified in writing by an engineer to meet specifications as required by TESCO with one fixture and necessary wiring. B. Location of street lights shall be as follows: 1. At all intersections. 2. Where a new street intersects an old street. 3. Where a block is 600 feet or longer a street light shall be installed every 600 feet or mid-block whichever is the shortest distance. 4. If more than one mid-block light is required they shall be installed to create an equal balance of light throughout the entire length of the block. 5. If a cul-de-sac block ;s 400 feet or longert a street light shall be installed in the end of the cul de sac. 6. If the cul de sac block is long enough, item number 4 above applies. 7.Street lights shall be installed at any other location as may be directed by the . Director of Public Works for the welfare and safety of the communi ty. .. --(. , '-.. Mr. Hannon said he felt they should change the 400 feet in item #5 to read "300 feet". ~4r. Wood made the motion to approve this amendment to the Sub-division ordinance with this amendment. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. ADJOURN1·1ENT The meetinq adjourned at 11:15 P. M. . CHA I Rt1AN , PLANN I NG AND ZON I NG COMM 155 ION SECRETARY, PLANNING AND ZONING COM~ISSION ORDINANCE NO. (. A}ŒNDING ORDINANCE 195, BY ADDING SECTION 2-06 STREET LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SUB-DIVISIONS. BE IT ORDAINE RICHLAND HILLS, TE A. Street 1ig on approve 1. Poles and th 2. Poles develo sub-di 3. Poles shall specif Co . wi of adoption of this ordinance the BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH S, that: On and after t following shall pre ts in all sub-divisions sh~ll be i~stalled metal poles. ~ . ust be approved by T~xa~ E enr-l,",-e Ce-. Director of Public Works. hall be contracted and paid for by the er during the construction phase of a ision and before building permits are issued. ot purchased through Texas Electric Service Co. e certified in writing by an engineer to meet cations as required by Texas Electric Service h one fixture and necessary wiring. B. Location 0 street lights shall be as follows. 1. At all intersections. 2. Where new street intersects an old street. 3. Where block is 600 feet or longer a street light hall be installed every 600 feet or mid- (. block hichever is the shortest distance. 4. If mor than one mid-block light is required they shall e installed to create an equal balance of light hroughout the entire length of the block. 5. If a c 1 de sac block is 400 feet or longer. a street light shall be installed in the end of the cui de sac. 6. If the cuI de sac block is long enough, item number 4 abov applies. 7. Street lights shall be installed at any other location as may be directed by the Director of Public Works for th welfare and' safety of the community. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day of »1983. APPROVED: ATTEST: Dick Faram, Mayor .. Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM ND LEGALITY Rex McEntire, City A torney .UBJECT:. . DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Re uest for A eal Hearin Public ·WoLks-Plannin Plannín Commission denied thi /~,- DATE: Februarv 14. 1983 If Council rants an a eål hearin it can be heard on March 14 1 ----- ._-- CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Bt 1 e~; E1~ED I Tr:~1 : Þ~CC()UNT NUMBER: YES Approve/Disapprove NO N/A ~~._~----~~~~--~~~~-~-~------ -~~---~------~~~~---~~~-~~-~-~-~~---~--~---~~-~~~~-~--~-~--~-~ e ALCO DEVEL)PMENT COMPANY . 3725 FLORY Fort Worth, Texas 76118 January 31, 1983 Mr. Roger ].Jine Ci ty ManagE~r City of North Rich1and Hills P.O. Box IB609 North Rich and Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. L ne: I wouJd like to request that the City Council heér an appeal of the decision of the Zoning Board regarding P.Z. #82-33 denied on January 27, 1983. . EPA:gr . Very truly yours, ALCC DEVELOPMENT CO. ~. ,''? ~//" . , '___ 11~,~; 7- /,-~ Æv~ Él.er P. Allison 589-2221 3725 Flory Fort Worth, Texas 76118 : f/JUBJECT: . DEPARTMENT : BACKGROUND: If Council ...--- "--- DATE: Februarv 14~ .1983 ,/ ""'" / l¡" Re uest for - PZ 83-2 CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Bt ìD~)'ETED ITD1 : YES N/A NO Þt.CCOU~¡T NU}fBER: -- - ......-- -- - ~-- ~-- -~.... -- -- -_......--~ - --- ~.-....------ -- --._-...~...~_--._~-......_--.----...._-----------....._...._----~----~---........_---- . ... . . , ., ~, .' --. - .. J- 3-1-~:3 . -~'------"'-----'~------..-- -~-_..._- .~ - --'--. . '-- -. -.- -.-.-.-.---.-...------..... . .- ....-.-..¿ ... -.. ...-" -... - -.... .---.- .... ... -.---...- -.... ------~_. '" - - . .- ... . "-- - ,-' ,-- .-.--........----- ~;-_.......-"'....._.__.~_.~..-. _.--~_.'......- -' _.-.-....'.~._-~_..... ._.....~._._,-------, --------~-~. .... .'.-- ~."--""...."'.-.,-~-..-....--- '1 ~ ...__.~- .. ..~-~. ..-~~=~---.~~---...~._-~~:~__;_._-.--. .j ~\<~..ß_ --._~___~~~....__\. ~__.~ .1~~D3. '.-_' ..~~~ ..~.. . '-C\~_ .~....~ Oq ~ ."_..__ · ~ '. ~. ._~--.- .p_~_.':L'_... ..~~ __ . .H___.. _ . ... ..; ðV\... ~~.. - a,-..~Ò--~-_.-~~..N~.._-----. .. . ~~~~~oJ.. ....~_ ._.~~~ .~~~ _ ~ . ~ .~.-. ~....... '. ..~---N~-b-~-_--~.....----...-...-. _: ~ .'"\.ù~ . ~_'~~"~'~~_'....1 _.. : ~~ ~--.-~._-- -.. . ~=- ~~.=_.~-~.=---~~~~-~~. ~ .--~--~~-~=. -.--.-.. ~.~\ ~\.\-.....-~~.--..~~.t\.~.. _... ~ . ~. . ......- '."-'-'. ...- -- _...-._....--- --.. ._. - -. ..- '---'0"_- o' _ _.. _...... . _ .. ....._,.,. .- ,_.0-",,- _.._ _____._._____...__ 0_"." o. .. ,._," . : -,-.--.. -_0.. - '..-'..-..__"__,...-__.. _ .." _..,__o.___~ 't:-~ cr~.) -.-,-._._'..'n.q.._ ~ ~4_._.__~_._...___.._"___.. .. __._ .....,.._.._'-.. _._..._ .4' . _. __4 . l7 ... DATE: 2-10-83 . . . SU3J~CT:. Variance to Sign Ordinance - DEPARTMENT: Public. Works ~ - 'Y-'l. BACKGROUND: Racetrac Petro eum is asking for several variances. On~ being they want us to allow an 800 sq. ft. pole sign and our ordinance only ållows 190· sq. ··ft. They also want 2 pole signs end the ordinance only allows for on~. They have also . . requested signs taller than 1>0' which is the maximum the ordinance', allows. -. . . At this point we do ·not 1 now what height they are requés.ting. . . , . (1.'f- '1)0 ~~ .......... . Pr.) ,IOj ~ t;)O -.or" ./ e- .- ---- .................- .- CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove any or all variances· BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/ A NO :::::::_::~:::~--~~-~-~~--- -------------~--------------------------- . - ... 81 February 1 t 1983 City of N. Richland ills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 N. Richland Hillst T xas 76118 To ~~om It May Conce n: Re: Racetrac Station 7605 Grapevine Hwy. N. Richland Hillst Tx. 76118 This letter is 0 request a meeting with the City Council in regards for a sign v riance for the above referenced location. If I can be of ny assistancet please do not hesitate to contact me. TRP/ps T. Richard Vice President of Design po. Box 1 5035 Atlanta,Georgia 30348 (404) 434-0400 . .þ '. .. ~ . '. ~ '. ~ ... j" to :. ~ þ . . " . .. ~ , . . . , . ....... . ..... '. ...- -....-.....--.-..-.-.... -. ...- --... . .. (b) Temporary Si s: a single filing/permit fee of $10.00 shall be required for temporary signs. SECTION 3.10 IDENTIFICATI Every sign or othe advertising structure erected shall have painted on, or otherwise permanently marked upon it a number assigned by the Building Department, which shall be not less than one (1) inch in height and shall be plainly visible from the ground or from the roof djacent to the sign. ARTICLE 4 AREA OF SIGN PERMITTED SECTION 4.1 SIGNS: (a) For signing p rposes, frontage on private streets that serve as public thoroughfares and not just iveways may, with City Council approval, be considered as qualified street frontage (b) Anyone (1) d velopment may have a choice of, but not more than, one (1) ground sign or one (1) r of sign or one (1) projecting sign, subject to the excep- tions contained in Section 4.2 through 4.8. In the case of very large ~evelopments (e.g., shopping centers, apa tment complexes, etc.) that have substantial frontages on two or more streets (with commercial or industrial zoning on both sides of the streets), additipna1 ground signs may be permitted with specia~ approval from the City Council. SECTION 4.2 GROUND SIGNS Ground signs are s the following provisions: (a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each 300 linear feet · of qualified street frontage ith each development in all zoning districts except AG, l-F, 2-F and MF. (b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be measured as one (1) square foot of are of sign for each linear foot of street frontage, to a maximum area of sign of 300 square feet for anyone sign. (c) The maximum he'ght of any ground sign and its supporting structure shall be twenty-five (25) fee , except that the height of a ground sign may be in- creased by adding one (1) foo of height for each linear foot the sign is set back ~om the adjacent property Ii es, not to exceed a maximum height of fifty (50) feet ~ the top of the sign. (d) The height of a y ground sign may not exceed one-half (;) the shortest linear distance from the location of the sign to the nearest boundary of any AG, I-F, 2-F, or MF zoning district. . - .. ... . - - .... -- -. - -. . (e) The sign sha or over any area within ten (f) A minimum qu ground sign.- (g) Permanent at signs. SECTION 4.3 ROOF SIGNS 1 not project over the property line of the development (10) feet of the curb of a public street or thoroughfare. lified frontage of 100 feet shall'be required to erect a to the ground shall be required for all ground Roof si~s permit ed are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (1) roof sign may be permitted with each development in all zoning . . distr icts except AG, l:-F, 2 F, and ME'. (b) Roof signs sh 11 not project over the edge of the roof or eave. (c) The maximum ermitted area of roof signing shall be one (1) square foot of sign area for each linear foot of property frontage not to exceed a maximum of 100 square. feet. (d) The height of a roof sign shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the apparent flat roof or eave line. (e) Roof sign sup orts should be architecturally attractive or screened from view. SECTION 4.4 PROJECTING 51 NS projecting signs p rmitted are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (I) proje ting sign may be permitted with each development in all zoning districts except AG, -F, 2-F and MF. (b) projecting si ns shall not project over the property line of the develop- ment or over any area within ten (10) feet of the curb of a public street or thorough- fare. . (c) projection of sign shall not extend more than four (4) feet from any wall facing. (d) Thè total per itted area of a projecting sign shall be measured as one (1) square foot of sign area for each linear foot of property frontage not to exceed a maximum of 100 square feet r t ,'4 . DATE: February 10, 1983 /<t . . .. 1983 FrOl1 t Whee Drive EcononlY Car - Police.- CID Di visi~11 , On Tuesday Febrlary 8, 1983, at 10:00 A.M. (4 ) bids wer~ opened in the SlT:tJJ ECT : . . JEP ¡\RTI1ENT: BACKGROUND: office of Purchasing Ag3nt. They are as follows: Bids mailed - 2l, Bids received - 4 AMT. EXCEPTIONS . . (1) King Charlie Hillar:1 Ford NO BID - - . . (2) Ted Arendale Ford NO BID - .- (3) Frank Parra Chev. $8,539..89 3 (4) Rya11 Oldslnobile . $8,385.00 1 This vehicle will be a replaceInent for police unit 2252, a patrol car which wa~ den~lished in an accident. The ,funds .to pu~chase this vehicle will be available from the insurance .--- -- settlelnent 011 the wreck3d car. Fourteen inch tires were specified in e~ror, since ol11y thirteen inc:1 tires are 'available. on these sIualler ca1;"s. - -------------.. This vehicle is in stock a t Ry~n Oldslnobile and is available' for . .. imrued.j.a te .delivery. ---- CITY COUI~CIL ACTI01~ REQUIRED: Consideration and approval or disapproval of --..--... awarding bi'd to-BYan Ol:ìsmobile in ·the aInount of $8,385.00 BPT.):~ETED ITEM: YES .....,---- NO X --- .. C C ()In\IT N · R : 01- 80- 04 - :> 6 00 '.. 1)Jgt~ . ~-----------------------------------------------------~---- . - - , ,. f- ~\1L CITY 0 F ' NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PUR( :HASING DEPARTMENT .~~ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Star of t he ~1etroplex .. . INVI ATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM r , VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: 21-692 Request For: C.I.D. Vehicle RYAN OLDSMOBILE, INC. Bid Opening Date: February 8, 1983 6620 Camp Bowie Blvd. Date: January 13, 1983 Fort Worth, Texas 76116 Requisition No. 10132 Sealed bids wi II be received until ~ City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills. Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: 281--0041 ITEM DESCRIPTIC N " ~ ." : QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 1983 Front Wheel Drive Vehi cle 1 each g 3 8S--~ 838S-°Q.., . . . . ... "JI .. -- ' . SUB-TOT AL "- ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND OTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ~ T. % DAYS, F.O.B. CITY 0 .. NORTH IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- AI "NO HI LLS: DELIVERY IN DA VS FROM CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hil s P u rchas- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- ing Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, wai Ie formali· LAND HilLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI· ties, or to award purchases on an individual item basis \ vhen in iu . TUTES A BIND'~G CONTRAp. \.'ß.t. ~ I best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD· COMPAj,Y: _ _Þf;41 ~~K~..-\(7 ....v"e., ¡ ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CtTY OF NORTH AICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. BY: (j W >0..J.~~.4-A.ssiS+.ant ~Ieet M~r. PHONE NUMB~: g-f3. : 38'-12ð{ - SIGNATURE: _pf/ 1..a,1/ ./A- DATE: I /:l-c, /Ý3 t1 / -/ I I . . . /q83 ~ O~ J. /J~. This spec fication is intended to describe in the minimum r quirements for a midsized 2 door automobile. /1. ~ ~ A. Wheel base shal be a minimum of 100 in B. Engine shall be a minimum of 2.5 liter C. Vehicle shall b a front wheel drive D. Color shall be lected from in stock cars E. Air conditionin - factory installed F. Vehicle shall h ve power steering/brakes G. Vehicle shall h ve automatic transmission H. Vehicle shall b equipped with Fabric bucket seats I. Wh~els shall be 14" with full wheel covers I~u J. Vehicle shall h ve vinyl body side molding K. Battery ~OO amp inimum R.D. L. Coolant system .D. sealed M. Vehicle shall b equipped with remote control outside mirror N. Vehicle shall b equipped with tilt steering wheel O. Vehicle shall b undercoated P. Vehicle must ha e been manufactured on North American Continent Q. All standard model bid must be included ~R. Vehicle must be instock at Bidders place of business;", on bid opening ate S. Said vehicle wi 1 be held for 20 days by lowest. bidder after bi opening T. Vehicle shall b available for delivery 1 day after award of id by City Council of North Richland Hills U. Vender shall ply 1 each maintenance manual with vehicle ~v~ ð>1N ~ ~d>O~ ~ ~ Compliance Yes No v ~ ~ v V' /", ~ ~ ~ ~ ! t . .. ... . --......-- The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Ric11land II ills , on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions, and the spec fications and any other conditions that may be attacl1ed. . . - ~~ Sigr¿e ... . .. Title Assistant Fjeet Mgr. I /:21 /~3 I 21-692 RYAN OLDSMOBILE, mc. 6620 CamQ Bowie RII1( Company ~g~e Worth, Texas 76116 Då t·e . . DATE: 2-9-83 ) 1 .UBJECT :. Prewitt Road Waterline - DEPARTMENT: Utility, - BACKGROUND: This is a line a developer is putting in at a location in Watauga. We took bids on this line because our participation is more than $10,odOt . . Our share is $2l~575.32 less inspection fee. This represents the differenc~ between a 8" line . . and 16". . . . . , . . -.... ~-.......... ..- CITl COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve the bid of Circle C Construction Co. for $75,557.50 subject to the developer escrcwing funds Qr submitting a letter of credit in an amount of $57,004.48. .-.--- BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ".,: ::-CoDNl 1-~nißS:<: Utility Bonds f-jj- _________________~~_~_~-~_~.__ --------J1~-f!JL~-~--------------------------- . - - BID TABULATION ~-----~~--~~--------~-----------~---------------~--------------------------~-------------------------- PROJECT : 16-INCH WATER "AIM IN PREWITT RD. LOCATION: WATAUGA,TEXAS OMNER: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND·HILLS ENGINEER: VESELKA EN6INEERINB CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT NUMBER: WlS1166 BIDS OPENED : 02/03/83 AT 10:00 AM . ----------------------------~----------------~ --------------------~--------------------------~------- CIRCLE C CONST. P.O. BOX 40328 FT. WORTH , TX. 76140 REEDY CONST. CO. 5019 PARRISH ROAD FT. WORTH, TX. 76117 ITE" QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION ----------------------------~--~-------------- -----~-------------------------------------------~----- UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL ---------------------------------------------~ ---~-----~---------------~-------------~---~~---~---~-- 1 2,083.00 l.F. 16-IN. PCCP WATER PIPE 28.50 59,365.50 28.97 60,344.51 2 130.00 L.F. 8-IN. PVC WATER PIPE 20.00 2,600.00 14.65 1,904.50 3 1.00 EACH 16-IN. GATE VALVE & BO) 2,600.00 2,600.00 3,125.00 3,125.00 4 2.00 EACH a-IN. SATE VALVE' BOX 480.00 960.00 457.00 914.00 S 1.00 EACH b-IN. SATE VALVE' BOX 300.00 300.00 405.00 405.00 I.> 1.00 EACH STANDARD FIRE HYDRANT 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 7 1.00 EACH b-IN. BLOW-OFF ASSEMBL' 800.00 800.00 1,052.90 1,052.90 8 1.00 EACH I-INCH WATER SERVICE IbO.OO 160.00 297.50 297.50 . 40.00 L.F. STD. STREET CUT , REPA R 10.QO 400.00 22.50 900.00 40.00 L.F. ASPHALT DRIVEWAY REPAI~ 12.00 480.00 22.50 900.00 11 80.00 L.F. DRIVEWAY BORE 55.00 4,400.00 47.50 3~BOO.OO 12 50.00 C.Y. ROCK CUSHION 5.00 250. OCI 19.85 992.50 13 20.00 L.F. CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12.00 ~O..oO 82.25 1,645.00 14 75.00 L.F. B-IN. VCP SEWER PIPE 5.00 375.00 6.B7 515.25 15 6.00 L.F. b-INi VCP SEWER PIPE 4.00 24.00 12.65 75.90 16 1.00 EACH STANDARD S.S. MANHOLE 750.00 750.00 1,175.00 1,175.00 17 16.00 L.F. TRENCH. BACKFILL 0'-6 8.00 128.00 8.92 142.72 18 65.00 L.F. TRENCH ~ BACKFILL 6'-8 9.00 585.00 10.15 659.75 19 20. (to L. F . STREET CUT & REPAIR 7.00 140.00 22.50 450.00 TOTAL AMOUNT BID -~-----------~----------------~--------------~ ---------~-~---~-~~--~-------~------------------~------ 80,424.53 75,557.50 WORKING DAYS BID ----------------------~------~---------~------ ------------~----------------~-------------~----------- 35 . 50 16-INCH WATER MAIN IN PREWITT RD. (CONT~D) . --------------~-----~~--~~----~----------~----- -------------~---~----~-------------------------------------~ LEONARD HAZEL P.O. BOX 48098 WATAlISA, TX. 76148 LARRY JACKSJN 2103 BANCROIT CT. ARLINGTON, X. 76017 LOWELL ALLISON 3725 FLORY ST. FT. WORTH , TX. 76118 L.D. CONATSER P.O. BOX 15302 FT. WORTH, TX. 76119 ITE" ---~------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------~--------- TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TnTAl UNIT TOTAL UNIT ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 . 16 17 18 19 29.50 18.50 2,815.85 475.00 330.00 1,100.00 875.00 150.00 26.00 20.00 75.00 10.00 10.00 8.10 7.10 600.00 4.00 4.50 26.00 61,448.50 2,405.00 2,815.85 950.00 330.00 1,100.00 875.00 150.00 1,040.00 800.00 6,000.00 500.00 200.00 607.50 42.60 600.00 64.00 292.50 520.00 32.60 13.00 3,200.00· 430.00 350.00 1,000.00 1,200.00 250.00 25.00 20.00 75,00 20.00 60.00 3.00 1.50 900.00 7.50 11.00 25.00 ----- 67 905.80 1,690.00 3 200.00 860.00 350.00 1,.000.00 1 200.00 250.00 1 000.00 800.00 6 000.00 1,000.00 1 200.00 225.00 9.00 900.00 120.00 715.00 500.00 32.72 17.25 4,050.00 776.31 483,11 1,467.71 1,023.46 138.48 17.06 17.06 82.50 16.00 6.50 4.04 4.54 778.61 9.86 12.75 17.06 68,155.76 2,242.50 4,050.00 1,552.62 483.11 1,467.71 1,023.46 138.48 682.40 682.40 6,600.00 800.00 130.00 303.00 27.24 778.61 157.76 828.75 341.20 34. 50- 13.50 3,000.00 450.00 300.00 1,150.00 1,200.00 180.00 20.00 15.00 70.00 10.00 25.00 5.00 3.50 1,000.00 8.00 8.75 20.00 71,863.50 1,755.00 3,000.00 900.00 300.00 1~150.00 1,200.00 180.00 800.00 600.00 5,600.00 500.00 500.00 375.00 21.00 1,000.00 128.00 568.75 400.00 TOTAL BID: ~~-------~~--~--~----------~---------------------~----------~-----------~------------------------------------ 90,841.25 S(t, 740. 95 88,924.80 90,445.00 -----~----------------------------~-------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORKING DAYS: . 30 80 40 45 DATE: 2-3-83 C,··· ", TECT. . "U '",,,. . --...._,~- Smithfield Acre Sanitary Sewer Project i)EPft..RTMENT: Utility BACKGROUND: This job is c mplete except for a small amount of grading of the soil 'and handwork. payment. ----. . .... "- ,. ... .-.,. ,..'-- ..______Þ"... ___-..-.._ _... e still have a lO% retainer on this job after" this CITY COUNCIL ACTI01~ REQUIRED Approve payment to Lewis & Lewis in the amount of $9,7Sl.42. BUDGETED ITEM: YES -.-.-.--- ----..-..-"-. -_..~ NO X i . ¡: :.~ (( UNT' I'~L tIll) l~~. : _ _~ ~_~ ~ J._~y_ . -- -------~--------------------------- ~ . . . KNOW TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas Februa ry 1, 1983 Honorable Mayor' nd City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. loop 8 0 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-901, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, SMITHFIELD ACRES SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.1 Enclosed is one c py of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. I, dated January 19, 1983, made payable to Lewis and Lewis in the amount of $9,751.42, for ma erials furnished and work perfonmed on the referenced project as of Jan ary 19, 1982. The quantities an condition of the project have been verified on-site by your represent tive, Bill Rutledge, as indicated by .signature on the estimate, and we ave checked the item extensions and additions. We recanmend that this payment in amount of $9,751.42, be made to Lewis and Lewis at P.O. Box 11507, Fort Worth, Texas 76109. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Don Lewi , Lewis and Lewis ;7 Mr. Gene Rid le, Director of Public Works ~ Mr. Bill Rutledge, City Inspector 550 FIRST STATE BANK BL G.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367 "" DATE: 2-7-83 ~ . . ~ .UBJ~CT ~ North Hills Street and Drainage Project - DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: This is payment #1 of this project. I estimate they have completed 20-2~% of this projéc~ a~ of this date. I· .. . .. . . . .. -- - ..........' ....-..-...... CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove pä~ent of $94,502.77 .to Stolaruk Corp. BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO AC:OUNT NL11BER: General Fund Bonds -----.- ._~ tf) _ '0 {flJ ----------------------------- ---~--~----------~--~------------------------ . - . . . KNOW TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas February 3, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North R;ehland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-325, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NORTH HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1 Enclosed is one co y of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.1, dated February 2, 1983, ade payable to Sto1aruk Corporation, in the amount of $94,502.77, for ma eria1s furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of Janu ry 31, 1983. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representa ive, Bill Rutledge, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and weh ve checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that his payment, in amount of $94,502.77, be made to Stolaruk Corporati n at P. O. Box 61587, Dallas, ~xas 75261. Along with a copy f this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate fo for preparing next month's estimate. , RWA:mh Enel osu re cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Scott Roi , Stolaruk Corp. ~ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works ~ Mr. Bill Rutl dge, City Inspector 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 . -~..~ ,-1 r L>'" DATE: 2-8-83 .UBJECT~ Signalization of Davis & Main ," - DEPARTMENT: Public Works - - This project is complete for Item 25 on the attachment BACKGROUND: except and a 30 day trouble 'free operation period. . . $32,946.74 Less 4 Detector AMPS $ l,49l.00 . . $3l,455.74 . " . . Balance $ 3,145.57 $2~,3l0.l7 .. Less 10% Retåinage .- - ...... ....~....... .... CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve payment of $28,3l0.17 to Southwestern Electric Co. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X General FLnd Reserves . -----..---- ..- 6~ r --------------------------~~~~- --- - ------------~--------------------------- I t.C :C'UN1~ l':ù11ßER: . - . ... ,- INVOICE , .. .t ~: Traffic Signal Davis Boulevard Invoice No. 033345 . Da te: February 7, 1983 Sold to IIonorable Mayor & Ci ty of North Ri 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hill , TX 76118 Ship to Customer Order No. Jab No. 82-27 Terms: Net Interest at 1 ~ % per month past 30 days. Date Shipped F.O.B. QUANTITY SHIPPED DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL or ~ Following Quantities Installed cintract Dated July 27, L 1982 . Quan. · tlem Unit Price Total 1 lea 2-Phase Actuated ignal Contl:oller with Fai1road PreeIrpticn Fæt $ 8,257.00 $ 8,257.00 2 lea Paver SUpply As 237.00 237.00 3 1· ··e.a;.-~':;Contl:oller Cabine 168.50 168.50 4 4 ea Pull -Boxes 133.18 532.72 5 249 If I-inch PVC Condui , in Trench 2.43 605.07 6 35 If 2-inch PVC Candui , iÌl Trench 2.68 93.80 7 60 1f 2-inch PVC Condui , PUshed 10.48 628.80 8 50 If 3-inch PVC Condui , Î!l Trench 3.19 159.50 9 180 If 3-inch PVC Condui , Pushed 10.99 1,978.20 10 1,033 1£ 5 Conductor, i 12 Signal Cable .81 836.73 11 125 If 3 Conductor, #8 Pcrwer Cable 1.42 177.50 12 320 If 2 Conductor, 114 igniillCab1e .54 172.80 13 700 If 2 Conductor Shiel ed I:etectar lead Cable .61 427.00 14 1,000 If 1 Conductor, #12 ~K; XPIN I:etector Loop ~-lire .51 510.00 15 436 If 1 Conductor, #8 B e G1:o1.md Wire .54 235.44 16 Sea 3 Section, 12-in Traffic Signal F..ead 361.40 2,891.20 17 2ea 12-inch Pedestri Signal Heëd 282.90 565.80 19 lea Mast Ann Pole w/3 ' Ann 2,942.05 2,942.05 20 3ea !~t Ann Pole w/2 · Ann 2,990.00 8, 970-. 00 21 lea Shaft Foundation, Type A 223.30 223.30 22 3ea Drille:ì Shaft F tion, Type B 209.60 628.80 Þ 1 ea Drilled Shaft. Fo datial, Type C, 175.35. 175.35 1 pr Pedestrian Push"B ttons' ....,,. 39.18· 39.18 4 ea Detector Anplifi (Channel) 372.75 1,491.00 'IUI'AL WE $ jl,~4b.14 '\'e art' all Equal uµ ortunit:: En1pJoYt:'r. Tlti~ ùrdt..r j"" ~u}.j\.·('t td all I~('rleral Aid Requin.>n1ents. DUPLICA '\ . .a. DATE: 2-7-83 /) c/· .. .. f;lfBJECT :. Partial Payment 115 on Dawn Drive Project . " - DEP ARTMENT : Public. Wo.rks BACKGROUND: This project is almost ready for curb forms. They are asking for payment of $ 309 , 615 . 44. .. We ha~ billed them $2,638.00 for work we had to do the day after Thanksgiving on an emergency basis. THey failed to ,leave the street passable for the peop e that live there. As you can see from the attached . . invoice, we spent a lot of manhours and material on'tþ1s street. . , Thë labor was all holiday time. . . Payment Request $39,6,15.44 $ 2.,638.00 Less Invoice Balance this paYI~en t $36,977.44 o , .-- - ..'... ---... ~----._------_.- -"- (1/ 3~/?71.;!Ø . C1'1"i COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ApprovE" payment of~9tél~_4it to A11f:t1D Road (:0_ 1...", c:: ') r.., n ,,~ r . 1.. _-1- .. _ . . . . ~. _. __.. __.: _, _ .. ~-- ßUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO !.¡~ .~c.G~rr r':L"1-1nE.~: _ G.§ p ~ r_é.!.¡, . _ F:u.n d -11Q.n d s ~ ----------------------------- -------~-----------------~--------------------------- . - ( ... . City of JXõrth Richland H11s, Texas ~ Po 0. BOX 11609 I NORTH RICHlAN Hlus. TEXAS 7&111 TO " L Mr. Spec Stovall A.ustin Road Co. P. o. nO}: 2285 Ft. \!orth, Texas 1 p':J Superintendent 7 11rs e 15.00 hr 2 EquiTn~ent Operatprs 6 ì1rs ø 10.00 hr 3 j~ru~l: Drivers 6 hr~ (ì S. Q") lir 1 }!ec11ani.c 6 l1rs G 10. 00 Ìlr . 1 Fl iO Leader 6 l1rs 0 40.00 l1r 1 ~radcr G hrs Q 30.00 hr 3 Dump Truc~:s 6 11rs G 20. 00 11r CO"JCrstO!le $9.50 x 140 tDn REMARKS: fJ.eHse r~rr!it Drlyr'lC!lt ;,\8 soon ~s 1105!-;il·;1..~. _'0 IJ tI-. /íf)'1~ I, .8'''' ,. I ')", (L) . INVOICE NO. DATE: 12-16-8: I IN REPLY, REFER TO: Dawn Dr. Project -1 TOTAL CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMOUNT $ $ $ $ I05.00 120.00 243.00 60. O~, $ $ $ 240.00 180.00 3ó0.()O $1,330.00 $2,~3r.r.10 .... -.. _. ....". . . . ~ ~ .. KNOW TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas February 3, 1983 Honorable Mayor an City Council City of North Rich and Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North R;chland Hil s, Texas 76118 Re: 3-319, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ONYX OR. N. & DAWN OR. PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5 Enclosed is one co y of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.5, dated January 31, 1983, ade payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of $39,615.44, for ma erials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of Janu ry 31, 1983. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representa ive, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we h ve checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that his payment in amount of $39,615.44, be made to Austin Road Co. at P.O. B x 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. Along with a copy f this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank-estimate fa for preparing next monthls estimate. 4.. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road / Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector 550 FIRST STATE BANK BL G.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO /267-3367 , ...,It I DATE: 1'- Fe'hruriry 7~ 1983 SlTBJECT: . . Exte vd. DEP .A.L~TI1ENT : Public,Works BACKGROUND: As you have a bad traffic problenl 011 Davis Blvd. It seelns to . . . . be l£lore serious northb'ol nd in the evening than sOl1thhound in the Inorning. The state ,Highway Departnlen is in the process of extendi1,1g another lane northbound fronl Elnerald Hills Way few hundred feet. I asked the State"' to take a look at extendil1g this lane to mithfield Road a11d let nle know ·wIiat would be involved. A study was ntade and th agreed to an extension that wou.ld. take anoth~r. northbound lane 50 feet past Colle e Circ~e, p.lus 500 feet of transi,tion paveIuent. Mr. B.E. Davis of the State High ay Departlnent said" they do. not have funds available to do -- The proposed would furnish all labor and equipluel1t if the City paid the job, but that the S for nta ter ial. estimate for approxintately 1,350 feet is $36,000. k is a badly needed improvenlent. The Highway D.epartIuent is responsible for all its cost, 'but it wi~l likely be several,years before ----~........ perluanent ilnprovenlents Davis Blvd. are extended in,to' this area. -----------..., --.-... City Coul1cil is requested. CITY COUl~CIL .ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove extensio11 0,£ a northbound lane through College Circle 011 Davis lvd. by jo~r~t effort of the City and state. If approved, . - it is reCOIU!Uellded tha t $ 6,000. be appropr ia ted froIH the General Fund Con tingency Account for this project BT~;):;FJ~ED ITEM: YES l~O x -.- ----..... --- -'- ·~C~()lTNT NUMBER: C011tin~nc. Account ...... - ... -. --~-,..._. ....-...--------- -.... ~- -~.. --- -----~- -~~---------~~---~--~--~-~~~--- . ~ ... . . . COMMISSION TATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION P. O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, Texas 76115 February 7, 1983 _e_ e_ ENGINEER-DIRECTOR MARK G. GOODE \ ROBERT H. DEDMAN, CHAIRMAN A. SAM WALDROP JOHN R. BUTLER, JR. Subject: FM 1938 Control 1978 Secti on 1 Tarrant Count IN AEPL Y REFER TO FILE NO. Mr. Gene Riddle Director of Public Work City of North Richland Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Dear Mr. Riddle: We recently extended th transition on the northbound lane of FM 1938 from Emerald Hills north app oximately 0.2 miles. This widening improved traffic conditions at the signalized transition of Emerald Hills and FM 1938. After we discussed the joint venture between the City of North Richand Hills and the State Departmen of Highways and Public Transportation of extending this same widening north to COllege Circle Drive, we have prepared an estimate of quantities for materials needed to widen FM 1938 on the east side from a 121 lane with 101 shoulders to two 121 driving lanes with 101 shoulders and tran- sition back into the 121 lane north of College Circle Drive. Enclosed is a copy of th estimate for flexible base, asphalt, and concrete to perform this work. After you have reviewed this estimate a~d further considered extending the widening t College Circle Drive, and if you concur, we will proceed with completíng this project before the summer of 1983. As we discussed, if the City 0 North Richland Hills will furnish the material, the State Department of High ays and Public Transportation will furnish necessary equipment, labor and sup rvision to perform the work. The materials purchased by the City should be in compliance with Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation 19 2 Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets and Bridges. If you would like to dis uss this further, please call. Yours very truly, ¿¿/~ BED:mg B. E. Davis District Maintenance Engineer f Texa. HI.hwa". Depart_e.t For.. ..88 161-15M ,., District No. ____~~_~ PROJECT ESTIMATE . For Mail1tenar: Special Jobs or Day ÚLbor Construction Tarrant Co. 220 HWY'19'38 Kind of Contro~ Sec. Job Struct. Coun ty n____________________________ No. -n___nn__ 1 ~ o. _____n_____ Project ___________ No. _!._.7_ª_ No. ____J______ No. ______________________ No. -n.-___n Limits: From: --------nC?=-~--~-~~--~~_~~~__~)_~n~.!_~~!~__~~!_~n_~~:~~_~-----___n____________________________ Length ____~~_~_________~ Ft. T · College Circle 0.36 . o. ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------________________________________________________________ Length ___________________ ______ MIle Present Condition: Two 12' Dr~ ving Lanes wi th 10 I Shoulders Proposed Work: Widen Existing Roadway from One 12' Lane to Two 12'" Lanes with 10' Shoulders on Eæ st Side. Prepared By:___~_:___E. -~-!!.~----- _____, -P-~!:--~~-~~:--------_______Engineer ..!!~~~~~---___19~ UIIT 0' I ITEM 10. DElel." .0. MWUIE QUAITln PIICE A.GUIT DESCIUPTIOI " 249 Flexible Base (Delivered) CY 2,500 322 ASDhalt (AC-S. AC-lO or RC-S) Gal. 3,000 22 A22re2ate '(Tv B or PB Gr 3 & Gr 4 CY 130 420 Concrete (el. A) CY 85 - Traffic Count___!~-L300 Total ........................................ ,___ Fatal + Injury Accidents in 19_________. Plus ----- % Engineering and Contingencies. . . . . . .. ,___ - ----------- ------ -- - ---- TOTAL ESTIMATE .................. . . . . . ... .. ,----.----____u___..L-__.;..._ Fatal + Injury Accident Rate Per 100 Million Vehicle Miles in 19____._____ . -- ------------------------------- - Recommended by: ---_.~---_._--_._----_..----- District Ma1ntenance Eng~neer (s.baaI& ProJeet Batlmate Ia qaa4raplleate aceompaaled b~ letter of reeGDUDeadatloD Ia dapUeate.) - - 7~··1 " ; . .1 .', I .'.~~ ,:-} : i\ . '1 J , , ì ~ ~ , I ¡ j . , ~ j . j i ì I ¡ 1 '\ ./ ; ¡ f . t a \it i ;1. j~ ¡n ~ !1: t ... \ . . . SlTBJECT :. JEP.ARTIfENT : BACKGROUND: ~...... DATE: February 1Q, 1983 Request for Private Water Service .. ' - Public Works Attached for your information is a copy of one page of Ordinance No. 837, adopted in 1980, authorizillg issuance of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds. The . . section -highlighted is a covenant which we have made with purchasers of the bonds . . - that we will not permit competing private water systems in our City. - -~-----..-....-..~. ... _._-- . . . . .' ~-~- ..----. CITY COUI~CIL J\CTION REQUIRED: It is reconm~nded that the request for private --_. --..- water service be :ìenied. .. BP7),';F'?ED ITm.1: '.' ·;I.CCnlTNT NLTMBER: _.. YES_ -NA..,__ NO~ ~L-.,. - - - -- - --- ..,.- -. ----- --- - - --. ---- ------ ---------------------------------------------------- - - ORDINANCE 837 - 1980 f/IIll f . appraised value of the portion being sold, and in addition to the sale price, the purchaser pays or makes provision for the payment of any penalties and added expenses that occur in such acquisition (including the cost of acquiring £or 'redemption bonds similarly secured Or 'Other obligations issued by the City to acquire such properties) and (2) the amount received by the City as the sale price is applied (or provision is made to apply) by such City to the payment and cancellation of bonds similarly secured or other obligations issued by the City to acquire such properties prior to ~heir regularly scheduled maturity by purchase in the open market or by exercise of the prepayment option, and (3) the governing body of the City ~finds that portion of the System to be sold is not required for the rendition of efficient service to the inhabitants of the City. (d) That no free services of the System shall be allowed, and should the City or any of its agents of instrilluentalities make use of the services and faci¡ities of the System, payment of the reasonable value thereof shall be made by the City out of funds from sources other than the revenues and income of the System; . SECTION 25: Bonds as Ne otiable Instruments. Each of the bonds herëIn authorize s a be eemed and construed to be a "security", and as such a negotiable instrument, within :¡ the meaning of Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code. t! 1~ H ;¡ il : ! ¡ ¡ t ;1 ; t £ , . f SECTION 24: Bonds are Special Obligations. The bonds , . are specialoorigations of the City payable from the pledged ! net revenues, and the holders thereof shall never have the ;¡ ri~ht to demand payment thereof out of funds raised or to be If ral.sed by taxation. jj ; , 11 II f t ! . SECTION 26 Ma or to Have Char e of Records and Bonds. Mayor of the City of Nort Ric an ílls shall be and he is hereby authorized to take and have charge of all necessary orders and records pending investigation by the Attorney General of the State of Texas, and shall take and have charge and control of the bonds herein authorized pending their approval by the Attorney General, their registration by the Comptroller of Public Accounts and delivery to the purchasers thereof. The SECTION 27: Confirmation of Sale. That the sale of thè bonds herein authorized to at the price of par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, plus a premium of $ , is hereby confirmed. Delivery of said bonds shall be made to said purchaser as soon as may be after the adoption of this ordinance upon payment therefor in accordance with SECtION 28: Printed al Opinion on Bonds. The purchasers' obligation to accept e ivery 0 t e on s ere~n authorized is subject to their being furnished a final opinion of Messrs. Dumas, Huguenin, Boothman and Morrow, Attorneys, Dallas, Texas, approving such bonds as to their validity, said opinion to be dated an4 delivered as of the date of delivery and payment for such bonds. Printing of a true and correct copy of said opinion on the reverse side of each of such bonds with appropriate certificate pertaining thereto executed by the facsimile signature of the City Secretary is hereby approved and authorized. ,. :.\ . . . Ci ty I~Ianager N. Richland Hills, T 76118 RE: Request for pIa e on agenda (2/14/83) Dear Sir: Feb. 2, 1983 Please place us on the agenda for the meeting on the 14th of this month for the purpose of obtaining approval to have l\lcKee vlater Co. supply water for prop sed developement. Ph: 281-5851 4~5-1-600 " - Thank you, M ,h.,tK- EARL 11CYJ l'mEY, Pres. It . MC~~STERS BLDRS, INC. 705 Glade Rd. COlleyville, Tx 76034 , -" . / / ,-:>" (.' !' " ~-7:;-. -----