HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1985-11-25 Agendas
'..... .
CITY OF NORTH RICHLANDHILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
NOVEMBER 25. 1985 - 5:30 P.M.
'-
For the Meeting conducted at the North R*chland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. Request of CBS Black HaWk
cab1. Communiations
Corporation to Transfer Cable
TV Franchise to Sammons
Communications, Inc.
2. PU 85-57 Proposal by City of Watauga
for Purchase of Water and
Sewer System
(Agenda Item No. 27)
3. Report on Improvements to the
Televising of City Council
Meetings
(Mayor Pro'1'em Davis)
4. ·niscussionof.Acquisition and
Restoration of RistoricHouse
(Councilwoman Virginia Moody)
5. Discussion of Additional
Polling Places for Municipal
Elections
(Mayor ÐanEchols)
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
6. GN 85-113 Adoption of Ordinance
Controlling Letters of Credit
andCettificates of Deposit
(Agenda Item No. 15)
7. Other Items
8. *Executive Session to Discuss
Land, Personnel, and/or
Litigation
*Closeddue to subject matter as provided by
the Open Meetings Law
~
..
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
NOVEMBER 25, 1985
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
NUMBER ITEM
1. Call to Order
ACTION TAKEN
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting November 11,
1985
5. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda
6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by
Asterisk (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, & 29)
7. PZ 85-121 Request for an Appeal Hearing on
PZ 85-121
8. PZ 85-126 Request for an Appeal Hearing on
PZ 85-126
*9. PS 85-78 Request of Wright Construction
Company for Final Plat of Steeple
Ridge Estates (Located on the
north side of Shady Grove Road,
west of Davis Boulevard)
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*10. PS 85-82 Request of Jeff Marsh for Final
Plat of Block 23, Kingswood
Estates (Located on the north side
of Starnes Road west of Kingswood
Court)
*11. PS 85-85 Request of Century Building
Construction for Replat of part of
Block 4, Northridge Addition
(Located on the northeast corner
of Harwood Road and Bob Street)
*12. PS 85-86 Request of Arnold Pent, III for
Final Plat of Lot 2, Block 7,
Richfield Addition (Located on the
northeast corner of Chapman Road
and Rufe Snow Drive)
*13. GN 85-111 Adoption of Texas Municipal
Retirement System "Updated Service
Credit" Benefit for 1986,
Ordinance No. 1310
*14. GN 85-112 Repeal of Ordinance No. 1282
Adopting Section 207(K) of the
Fair Labor Standards Act,
Ordinance No. 1311
*15. GN 85-113 Adoption of Ordinance Controlling
Letters of Credit and Certificates
of Deposit, Ordinance No. 1312
Page 3
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*16. GN 85-114 An Agreement with Lone Star Gas
Company for Extension of Gas
Service to the Municipal Complex
in the Amount of $14,788
*17. GN 85-115 Tarrant County Housing Finance
Corporation 1986 Single Family
Housing Bond Program, Resolution
No. 85-31
18. GN 85-116 Appointments to Industrial
Development Committee
*19. PU 85-49 Bid Award to IBM Corporation for
Three Personal Computers in the
Amount of $14,748
*20. PU 85-50 Bid Award to Graff Chevrolet for
One 1986 3/4 Ton Pickup Truck in
the Amount of $10,252
*21. PU 85-51 Bid Award to Texas Fire/Rescue
System for One "Jaws of Life"
Rescue Tool in the Amount of
$6,220
*22. PU 85-52 Bid Award to Padgitts
Communication Specialist for One
Character Generator in the Amount
of $5,741
*23. PU 85-53 Bid Award to Rudy Brown Machinery,
Inc. for Two 1400B Diesel Backhoes
in the Amount of $51,648
O'
Page 4
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*24. PU 85-54 Bid Award to Sutphen Corporation
for One Custom Aerial Ladder Tower
Truck in the Amount of $375,396
*25. PU 85-55 Bid Award 1500 GPM Pumper to
Sutphen Corporation in the Amount
of $145,370
*26. PU 85-56 Award of Bid for Hand-held Meter
Reading Equipment to Municipal
Software Consultants, Inc. in the
Amount of $25,710
27. PU 85-57 Proposal by City of Watauga for
Purchase of Water and Sewer System
*28. PU 85-58 Authorization of Purchase and/or
Eminent Domain Proceedings to
Acquire 33.1104 Acres of Land out
of the Telitha Akers Survey for
Golf Course Purposes, Resolution No. 85-32
*29. PAY 85~57 Partial Pay Estimate #1 to Austin
Road Company in the Amount of
$36,449.82 - Municipal Complex
Site Improvements
30. Citizen Presentation
Mr. Kenneth Knight
Re: Police Department
31. Adjournment
.1".".>,·...,...; :";,:).
.!iv~'J-~"',!;>,~.<:I-.,~",'>-"
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
'-
AN ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED TRANSFER
OF THE
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
IN
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
FROM
CBS BLACK HAWK
'-
TO
SAMMONS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Dated: November 20, 1985
Prepared by:
Herbst & Thue, Ltd.
2030 Northwestern Financial Center
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
(612) 835-2434
--
\.....-
'--
'-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Experience of SCI
Technical Qualifications
Financial Capability
Conclusions
Recommendations
-2-
· HERBST & THUE, LTD.
-
INTRODUCTION
The city of North Richland Hills has before it a request from
its present cable television operator, CBS/Black Hawk Cable
Communications and Sammons Communications, Inc. ("SCIn) to
approve the proposed sale of the business and assets of CBS/Black
Hawk Cable Communications from CBS, Inc. to SCI. The North
Richland Hills Cable TV Franchise Ordinance Number 796
("Franchise") at Section 5 and the City of North Richland Hills
Ordinance Number 977 ("Ordinance") prohibit CBS/Black Hawk from
selling or transfering its plant or system without prior approval
of the City Council.
CSB acknowledges, in an Affidavit signed by Mr. Nathan
Snyder, Vice President, that the City's scope of review of the
proposed transfer includes inquiry into the experience, technical
ability, financial capability and other qualifications of SCI to
operate the cable system. This report will follow that format.
'---
In order to prepare this report, certain information was
requested of SCI. To date, SCI has provided all necessary infor-
mation requested with the exception of a copy of its Purchase
Agreement. We have, however, received a letter, dated November
14, 1985, from Mr. Thomas H. Law, which provides us with a
general range within which the purchase price lies (between $18
and $22 million) and a statement of SCI's financing plans. With
the information provided in the November 14, 1985, letter, the
appropriate analysis of the transfer can be accomplished without
review of the Purchase Agreement. In preparing this report, the
fOllowing documents have been reviewed and relied upon:
1. A letter dated November 14, 1985 from Mr. Thomas Law, on
behalf of CBS/Black Hawk Cable Communications and SCI,
to Mr. John Gibbs relating to purchase price and
financing of the system.
2. A letter dated October 25, 1985, from Mr. Thomas H. Law
to Councilman Jim Ramsey transmitting tansfer documents
and its enclosures.
3. A letter dated October 16, 1985, from Mr. Thomas H. Law,
attorney representing CBS, Inc. to the City Council of
North Richland Hills regarding the transfer process.
4. A letter dated October 9, 1985, from Mr. Nathan Snyder,
Vice President, Acquisitions, CBS, Inc. to Mr. Jim
Ramsey outlining rational for the selection of SCI by
CBS.
--
-3-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
'---
9.
--
5.
A letter dated October 7, 1985, from William B. Strange,
Jr., Vice President of Corporate Development, Sammons
Communications, Inc. to Councilman Jim Ramsey,
transmitting corporate formation documents, a chart
showing the corporate ownership of SCI, a description of
Sammons Enterprises, Inc., the parent corporation of
SCI, an Audited Financial Report of SCI, a letter from
RepublicBank Dallas, N.A., regarding financing,
subscriber penetration information, employee account
information and statements regarding franchise modi fica-
~ions, the technical ability, financial capability and
legal qualifications of SCI, and refinancing.
6. A letter dated October 3, 1985, from Mr. Thomas H. Law,
attorney representing CBS, Inc. to Mr. Jim Ramsey
regarding the transfer process.
7. CBS/Black Hawk Cable Communications Pre-Tax Statement of
Operations for the calender years 1983, 1984 and first
four months of 1985.
8. CBS/Black Hawk Cable Communications Balance Sheet for
the calender years 1983, 1984, and first four months of
1985 and the accompanying notes.
CBS/Black Hawk - North Rich1and Hills Unaudited Allo-
cated Statement of Operations, Statement of Debts,
Statement of Allocated Sources and Uses of Funds Before
Taxes for the calender year ending December 31, 1984 and
the accompanying notes.
10. Report on Examinations of Consolidated Financial
Statements for the years ended December 31, 1984, and
1983, of Sammons Communications, Inc. and the accom-
panying notes prepared by Coopers and Lybrand, Certified
Public Accountants.
11. Various corporate formation documents filed with the
State of Delaware, relating to SCI, its predecessors,
parent corporations ahd affiliates, all of which are
currently on file in the City Hall of the city of North
Rich1and Hills.
12. City of North Richland Hills Ordinance Number 979 regu-
lating the conduct of business in cable television
within the corporate limits of North Richland Hills.
13. City of North Richland Hills Ordinance Number 796 - City
of North Richland Hills Cable TV Franchise.
'-
-4-
""--
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
EXPERIENCE OF SCI
-5-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
EXPERIENCE OF SCI
'-
SCI is a Delaware corporation which is wholly owned by
Sammons Cable Communications, Inc. which is a Delaware cor-
poration and which is wholly owned by Sammons Enterprises, Inc., a
privately held Delaware corporation. 89.6% of Sammons
Enterprises, Inc. is owned by Mr. Charles A Sammons. The balance
is owned by members of Mr. Sammon's family and retired employees
of the Sammons Organization under an Employee Stock Ownership
Plan.
In addition to cable television, the parent of SCI, Sammons
Enterprises, Inc. is divided into three other groups; Insurance,
Distribution and Hotel and Travel.
SCI has been owning and operating cable systems for over 24
years. Its corporate headquarters is in Dallas, Texas. SCI
currently operates 63 cable systems which serve more than 240
cities in 21 states. SCI's total number of subscribers exceeds
six hundred and sixty thousand (660,000). It is one of the 15
largest cable system operators in the United States. Exhibit 1
of this report lists SCI's current cable systems.
'--
SCI currently operates cable systems in 28 Texas cities
including Fort Worth.
SCI does have the experience to operate the cable system in
North Richland Hills.
-
-6-
"---..
'---..
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS
-7-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
-
TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS
SCI is a very experienced cable operator. A description of
the cable system operation experience of SCI is set "forth in the
Section titled "Experience of SCI". This experience suggests the
technical ability to operate the Black Hawk system.
SCI proposes to purchase the entire Black Hawk system as an
operating system. Technically, the System is functioning well.
The functionability of a cable system is a result of adequate
hardware, adequate management and operating procedures and ade-
quate staffing levels.
It would appear that upon assuming control of the Black Hawk
system, SCI will have the technical qualifications to operate the
Black Hawk system and that the Black Hawk system will function in
an acceptable manner if SCI retains and maintains current equip-
ment and an appropriate staffing level.
In his letter dated October 25, 1985, to Councilman Ramsey,
Mr. Thomas H. Law, stated "It has been Sammon's intention to
attempt insofar as possible to place any excess manpower now
located at Black Hawk into openings that occur at other Sammon's
systems in area." This statement raises the issue of future
staffing of the cable system. In addition to the suggestion set
forth above, it is our understanding that certain of the 1984
Black Hawk staffing positions are currently unfilled.
Although transfers within the company are probably very
desireable from the standpoint of employees and SCI, the staffing
level of the Black Hawk system is a fundimental component of the
technical capability to operate the system. Accordingly, it
would be appropriate to request, in conjunction with any transfer
approval, a certification from SCI that the Black Hawk 1984
staffing levels would not be reduced throughout the life of the
Franchise without prior approval of the City.
With regard to current operations and.facilities, it would be
appropriate to identify, at this time, any unmetfranchise com-
mitments and request SCI to submit to the City its plans for
meeting those commitments. These commitments are discussed in
further detail in the section of this Report entitled
"Recommendations".
-8-
'---
'--
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
FINANCIAL CAPABILITY
-9-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
FINANCIAL CAPABILITY
'---
A. General Financial Analysis of Sammons Communications.
This Section A addresses the corporate financial ability of
SCI to own, operate and make improvements to cable systems
generally. This Section will address debt/equity ratio, colla-
teral, cash flow, operating ratio, and rate of return. This
Section is prepared based on a review of the Report on
Examinations of Consolidated Financial Statements for the years
ended December 31, 1984 and 1983 prepared by Coopers and Lybrand,
Certified Public Accountants, as an audit of Sammons
Communications, Inc.
Debt/Equity Ratio. SCI maintains a debt/equity ratio of
approximately 54% debt and approximately 46% equity. In other
words, debt equals approximately 54% of overall capitalization of
the company. This debt ratio is reasonably conservative for a
current multiple cable systems operator. This conservative
debt/equity ratio suggests adequate capacity to borrow funds.
"---
Collateral-Borrowing Ability. The collateral value of SCI to
support borrowing is significant. SCI currently operates 63
cable systems serving a total of 660,000 subscribers. The
current market price for cable systems ranges from $700 to $1,300
per subscriber, or about an average of approximately $1000 per
subscriber. Accordingly, SCI currently may be "worth" , or might
have a "market value" of approximately $660 million. Even if the
market value of the cable systems averaged $700 per subscriber,
the "market value" of SCI overall would be $462 million. These
figures compare with SCI's total equity plus debt of only $162
million.
From the above, it is apparent that the collateral value of
the SCI systems and the borrowing ability is quite high.
Evidence of this borrowing ability has been provided to the City
in a letter dated November 14r 1985 from Mr. Thomas H. Law which
states that SCI currently has in place a line of credit with
banks in the amount of $250 million at the prime lending rate.
In addition, a letter dated October 3, 1985, has been received
from Repub1icBank of Dallas, Texas expressing that SCI's credit
facility is more than adequate to finance the purchase of the
cable system.
Cash Flow/Debt Service. SCI currently generates approximately
$10 million of annual net income and approximately $30 million of
cash flow (i.e., net income plus depreciation). Currently, SCI's
peak scheduled debt repayment over the next few years is approxi-
mately $15 million per year. SCI's cash flow minus its debt ser-
-lO-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
vice requirement leaves approximately $15 million per year to
~ provide for capital expenditures, dividends etc.. The cash flow
analysis suggests that SCI could support additional debt.
Operating Ratio. Operating ratio is a measuremênt of a cable
company's operating expenses, before depreciation and interest,
in relationship to revenue. The operating ratio of SCI is 60%.
Most profitable cable systems experience operating ratios of 50%
to 70%. 60% is considered the optimal operating ratio.
Operating ratios in excess of 70% are too high and indicate
that the systems are losing money. Operating ratios less than
50% are too low and indicate that the cable operator may not be
maintaining or servicing the system or that the parent company is
taking too much money out of the cable system. SCI's 60%
operating ratio indicates efficient operations company-wide.
Rate of Return. SCI has an after-tax profit margin of 9%
(net income after taxes as a percentage of revenues). SCI's
after-tax rate of return on equity equals 13%. The average
interest rate paid by SCI is approximately 11%. It should be
noted, however, that SCI has demontrated that it currently has
the ability to borrow money at the prime rate of 9.5%.
--
An industry standard adequate rate of return is between 15%
and 20%. SCI's 13% rate of return appears low relative to that
standard of acceptability and relative to SCI's average borrowing
cost. On the other hand, the 13% return on equity exceeds SCI's
current borrowing rate by more than 4% and it does indicate a
positive return.
B. Financial Analysis of Black Hawk Cable Communications
Profit & Loss
The Black Hawk system has been generating just under $6
million in revenue for the past few years and, looks to be headed
for about the same amount in 1985. The system has not been pro-
fitable, and will not be in the current year. During 1983 and
1984, Black Hawk realized a cash loss (See Line 15 of Exhibit 2),
but may experience a modest positive cash flow in 1985.
The main problem seems to be that the level of operating
expenses is quite high relative to revenue generated. The
operating ratio (operating expenses/revenue) has been 95% or
higher. Profitable cable systems experience operating ratios of
50% to 70%. Black Hawk will need a major expansion of revenue
and/or somewhat lower expenses in order to become profitable.
'--
-11-
I'
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
Rate of Return
'---
CBS has not enjoyed a positive rate of return on its invest-
ment in Black Hawk (See Line 23 of Exhibit 2). Cable system
operators seem to agree that a fair and adequate rate of return
is 15% to 20%. On Line 27 of Exhibit 2 is shown the level of
pre-tax net income needed for CBS to achieve a 15% rate of
return. The next item (Line 30) computes the amount of earnings
improvement necessary to enable CBS to earn such a return. Since
the latter amount is about $4 million, and the revenue base is
only about $6 million, it appears unlikely that CBS (or anyone)
could achieve the industry target rate of return.
Sammons has indicated by letter dated November 14, 1985, from
Mr. Thomas H. Law that its purchase price for Black Hawk is in
the range between $18 and $22 million. Using similar rate of
return calculations on the new investment base (purchase price),
it appears that Sammons will have difficulty earning sufficient
net income to cover interest costs on its investment (Lines 39 &
43 of Exhibit 2), much less a rate of return approaching industry
targets (Lines 48 & 51 of Exhibit 2).
'--
Although in the foreseeable future SCI has the ability to
raise adequate capital, generally it is necessary for a cable
system operator to earn an adequate rate of return on the system
in order to earn/attract the capital needed to maintain, enhance,
and possibly rebuild the system. Therefore, although the price
offered by Sammons can certainly be raised, the pressures to
increase revenues or decrease costs relating to the System as a
result of the purchase price are of concern.
C. Financial Conciusions.
SCI can raise sufficient capital to purchase, complete new
construction, make improvements, and in later years, probably
rebuild the system. The System, however, is a marginal finan-
cial performer, at best, for CBS/Black Hawk based on CBS'
purchase price. The above analysis rai.ses questions regarding
future plans of SCI to establish an acceptable rate of return on
its investment. SCI should be asked to outline future plans
regarding rates, operating procedures, staffing and any unmet
capital commitments set forth in the Franchise. In its letter
dated October 7, 1985, from William Strange to Councilman Jim
Ramsey, SCI stated that "SCI is not requesting any franchise
modifications in connection with the transfer and has no current
plans to request any during the remaining term of the franchise".
These issues are addressed further under the Recommendations
Section of this Report.
-
-12-
',--
-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
CONCLUSIONS
-13-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
.-
CONCLUSIONS
SCI has the experience to operate the Black Hawk cable system
efficiently and effectively. "
SCI has the experience and company-wide financial capability
to operate the cable system in a technically acceptable manner.
That operation can only occur, however, if acceptable staffing
and funding levels are maintained. Acceptable staffing levels
would probably be the 1984 staffing level presented by SCI as
Attachment 7 to its October 7, 1985, letter to Councilman Ramsey.
The 1985 level set forth in that Attachment, as we understand it,
would not be appropriate in that it represents certain staffing
vacancies and a mid-year "snap shot".
SCI has the financial capability to borrow sufficient funds
to purchase the Black Hawk system. SCI has also demonstrated the
financial capability to operate other cable systems. SCI has an
acceptable operating ratio indicating efficient operations and a
positive company-wide rate of return on investment.
-
The potential for pressure to increase revenues or decrease
operating expenses and limit capital expenditures at the expense
of cable system operation and customer satisfaction exists as a
result of SCI's purchase price of the system. SCI proposes to
purchase the system at a price between $18 and $22 million. This
compares to CBS's investment in the system of approximately four-
teen million six hundred thousand dollars ($14,600,000.00). CBS
is not experiencing a positive rate of return on its
$14,600,000.00 investment. Accordingly, it seems likely, in
order to achieve an acceptable rate of return on its $18 to $22
million investment, SCI may feel pressure to increase revenues
through rate increases or decrease operating expenses and limit
capital expenditures. Based on discussions with Councilman
Ramsey, the City Manager and the City Attorney, we understand
that there are certain issues which should be addressed in light
of the potential financial pressures outlined above. Those
issues are as follows:
* Maintenance of acceptable staffing level.
* Implementing a commitment to take steps
necessary to properly collect sales tax.
* Implement franchise commitments of one set-
aside channel for installation of security
alarm systems and installation of emergency
system-wide signal override service.
* Implementation of franchise commitments to
offer full bank FM radio service.
'--,
-14-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
'-
* Assure continuing implementation of
franchise commitments to connect all public
buildings to the system at no charge.
* Maintain CBS' current commitments regarding
franchise fees.
* Implement and maintain educational access
commitments set forth in the Franchise.
* Implement CBS' commitment to upgrade
converter box technology.
* Maintain and implement CBS' commitments
regarding studio and implement studio relo-
cation at the new City Library/Recreation
building.
* Assure future institutional network coopera-
tion.
* Assure maintenance of basic cable service
offerings.
-
'-
-15-
',--
"-
-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
RECOMMENDATIONS
-16-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
'-
RECOMMENDATIONS
After a review of the experience, technical qualifications
and financial capability of SCI to operate the cable system, we
have concluded that SCI can raise sufficient capital to purchase
and maintain the cable system but that, based on a purchase price
of $18 to $22 million, SCI will have created additional financial
pressures on the system which raise questions relating to the
likely capital expenditures, the possibility of operational
constraints and the possibility of significant pressure to
increase cable service rates to subscribers. The transfer
request also requires addressing legal changes in the Franchise
and its related documents to effectuate the proposed transfer.
We recommend that the City approve the requested transfer in
the event that SCI meets the following conditions related to
legal status changes, capital investment concerns, operational
concerns and revenue enhancement concerns:
"-
A. Conditions based on legal status changes - new ownership:
Acceptance Agreement. SCI should sign an Acceptance
Agreement whereby SCI contractually agrees to be bound by the
terms of the current Franchise and other documents which
CBS/Slack Hawk has submitted as commitments to the City,
including the original Proposal submitted by Black Hawk. All
certifications set forth herein as conditions should be included
and made a part of teh Acceptance Agreement. We will provide SCI
with a proposed draft Acceptance Agreement and we would be pre-
pared to negotiate its specific terms.
Guaranty. Sammons Enterprises, Inc., the parent company of
SCI should execute a Guaranty, which guarantees that the parent
company will step into the shoes of SCI and accept any obliga-
tions under which SCI is in default. We are prepared to submit
an original draft to SCI and the fina1 terms of the Guaranty can
be negotiated.
Performance Bond. SCI should be required to provide the City
with a cash bond as required under Section twelve of the
Franchise. We recommend that the bond requirement be increased
to $100,000.00 until such time as all capital commitments set
forth in these conditions are met and that the bond then be
reduced to $10,000.00. The bond would be conditioned upon the
assurance that SCI will discharge the obligations and conditions
contained in the Ordinance, Franchise and Acceptance Agreement.
Certificate of Insurance. SCI should provide the City a
Certificate of Insurance which demonstrates that SCI has obtained
-17-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
insurance in the amounts required by Section 10 of the Ordinance
- and Section 2 of the Franchi se.
Acceptance Fee. SCI should provide to the City an Acceptance
Fee in the amount of the City's actual out-of-pocket costs in
considering the franchise transfer request. Typically, these
out-of-pocket costs would include attorney's fees and publica-
tion costs.
B. Conditions Based on Concern Relating to Capital Expenditures:
Emergency Signal Override System. SCI should privode the
City with a time schedule for compliance with Section 9 ~f the
Franchise requiring the installation of an emergency signal
override system capable of interrupting signals, as may be
necessary to provide adequate civil defense and disaster service
information and to prevent the distribution of obscene or
libelous material. It is our understanding that this system is
currently not in place.
-
Channel for Security Alarm Systems. SCI should certify to
the City that one channel on the cable system shall be provided
for installation of security alarm services. The availability of
a channel for such system, not the actual installation of any
particular alarm system is required. This channel dedication is
required by Section 17 of the Ordinance.
Full Bank FM Signals. SCI should certify that it will offer
full bank FM radio service as required under Section 16 of the
Ordinance and provide a time schedule for the implemantation of
such service.
Service to Public Buildings. SCI should certify that all
public buildings will be connected to the cable system at no
charge as required under Section 24 of the Ordinance. This cer-
tification should take the form of an acknowledgment of a list of
public buildings provided by the City. It is our understanding
that two new fire stations .and one new Library/Recreation
building have been acquired or are expected in the near future.
These buildings should be included on the list prepared by the
City and a time schedule should be proposed for connection.
Public Access Studio at Library. SCI should certify that it
will meet all requirements of Black Hawk set forth in the letter
dated June 24, 1982, from Black Hawk Cable Communications
Corporation to Mr. Roger Line related to its North Rich1and Hills
studio and related equipment to the North Richland City Library.
In addition, an agreement should be entered into at this time
regarding the relocation of the library and studio at the new
Library/Recreation center and of the connection of that studio to
the City Hall.
-
-18-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
--...
Public, Educational and Governmental Access Channel Capacity.
SCI should certify that it will comply with the requirements of
Section 17 of the Ordinance requiring provision of at least one
educational channel to the Birdville Independent School District,
one channel to the Northeast Campus of the Tarrant County Junior
College, one governmental access channel to the City of North
Rich1and Hills and one public access channel for use by North
Rich1and Hills residents, together with cameras, studio, lights
and sound equipment.
Institutional Communications Network. SCI should certify
that, upon request from the City, SCI will develop a plan for
future implementation of an institutional communications network
linking all public buildings in North Richland Hills. Such plan
would include financial expenditures on the part of the City.
Converters. SCI should submit a proposal to change-out
existing subscriber's converters to an addressable remote con-
verter and a time table for implementing such proposal.
CBS/Black Hawk has previously represented to the City that the
change out would occur. SCI should certify its intention to
implement the proposal.
--
C. Conditions Based on Operational Concerns.
Level of Staffing. SCI should certify that it will maintain
a level of staffing for the cable system equal to or greater than
the level of staffing that CBS/Black Hawk maintained in 1984.
This staffing level consisted of 36 full-time and 4 part-time
positions dedicated to Cost of Sales, 12 full-time positions
dedicated to Selling, 21 full-time and 1 part-time position dedi-
~~ted to General and Administrative duties. CBS/Black Hawk main-
tained a total of 69 full-time and 5 part-time positions in '~o4.
Sales Tax. SCI should accept Ordinance amendments and cer-
rify that it will establish any office and reporting facilities
within the City to assure the rights of North Richland Hills to
receive sales tax revenues from sales tax paid by North Richland
Hills Subscribers until such time as the City determines that
state law would make such local office or reporting facilities
unneccessary.
Franchise Fees. SCI should accept Ordinance amendments
which reflect that SCI will be required to pay Franchise Fees in
the amount of 5% of the gross annual revenues of the cable
system collected from operations within the City. This is the
current practice of CBS, however, changes in federal law have
rendered the current Franchise language obsolete and the obliga-
tion should be clarified.
-
-19-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
Basic Cable Service Offerings. SCI should certify that it
'-- will continue to offer all "basic cable service" offerings
currently offered by CBS/Black Hawk on the cable system and
including all public, educational and governmental access
channels set forth in Section 17 of the Ordinance. "
City Council Programming. SCI should proposè and certify to
a level of support in the production and cab1ecasting of North
Richland Hills City Council meetings. This support could include
equipment, staffing and advise.
Consumer Protection privisions. SCI should agree to
Franchise and Ordinance ammendments implementing certain consumer
protection provisions as authorized by the Cable Communications
Policy Act of 1984 and which would help address financial
operating pressure concerns raised above. We recommend that such
consumer protection provisions include, at a minimum, the
following: Consumer complaint provisions, system maintenance
standards, interruption of service standards, service response
time standards, annual reports to City including financial
reports, monthly reports to City including reports on complaints,
operations and services, Periodic Evaluation and Renegotiation of
the Franchise Sessions, annual opinion survey of subscribers,
specific violations and penalties for violations of the
Franchise.
--
D. Conditions Based on Revenue Concerns.
Notice of Rate Change. Although under federal law all cable
service rates will be deregulated in North Richland Hills as of
December 27, 1986, SCI should accept consumer protection provi-
sions which require SCI to provide subscribers notice of upcoming
rate changes and the opportunity to disconnect prior to such rate
change without disconnection charges or the payment of an
increased rate.
-
-20-
'-
'---
-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
EXHIBITS
-21-
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
'---
ALABAMA
Chambers Co.
Franklin Co.
Lanett
Littlevi1le
r4.ou1 ton
Russe1lvi1le
Valley
CALIFORNIA
Burbank
Ceres
Glendale
La Canada
La Crescenta
Merced Co.
Stanislaus Co.
Sylmar
Tur10ck
Whittier
'--
CONNECTICUT
Midd1ebruy
Plymouth
Prospect
Waterbury
Wolcott
FLORIDA
Live Oak
GEORGIA
Troup Co.
West Point
Pine Mountain (Town)
Pine Mountain (unincorp.--
outside Troup City)
Pine Mountain (unincorp.--
outside Harris Co.)
Harris Co.
-
EXHIBIT 1
SCI CABLE SYSTEMS
ILLINOIS
Bruce
Dayton Township
Dwight
Eagle
Jacksonville
S. Jacksonville
Kangley (Village)
Marseilles
Morgan Co.
Naplate
Ottawa
Otter Creek
Pontiac
Reading
Streator
INDIANA
Logansport
IOWA
Esthervi1le
Graettinger
Emmet Co.
KENTUCKY
Middlesboro
LOUISIANA
Còncordia Parish
Vidalia
MISSISSIPPI
Adams Co.
Brookhaven
Escatawpa
Gautier
Jackson Co.
Lincoln Co.
-22-
MISSISSIPPI (cont'd)
Magnolia
McComb
Moss Point
Natchez
Pascagou1a
Pike Co.
Summit, Town of
MISSOURI
Neosho
Seneca
NEW JERSEY
Absecon
Alpha
Bloomsbury
Boonton (Town)
Boonton (Township)
Chatham
Denville
Dover
East Hanover
Egg Harbor Township
Florham Park
Galloway (Township)
Greenwich (Township)
Hanover
Harmony Township
Hopatcong
Jefferson (Township)
Linwood
Lopatcong
Madison
~Une Hill
Montville
Morris
Morris Plains
Morristown
Mr. Arlington (Boro)
Mr. Olive Township
Mountain Lakes (Boro)
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
'--
NEW JERSEY (cont'd)
Netcong
Parsippany-Troy Hills (Twp)
Phi1lipsburg
Pleasantvi1le
Pohatcong
Randolph
Rockaway Township
Rockaway (Boro)
Roxbury Township
Somers Point
Stanhope
Victory Gardens (Boro)
Wharton
NEW YORK
Amity
Andover (Town)
Andover (Village)
Belmont (Village)
Benton
Cortland
Cort1andvi1le
East Hampton (Town)
East Hampton (Village)
Gloversvi1le
Homer (Town)
Homer (Village)
Johnstown
Johnstown (Town)
Mayfield (Town)
Mayfield (Village)
McGraw
Milo
Penn Yan
Scio
We1lsvi11e (Town)
Wellsville (Village
Willing
'--
NORTH CAROLINA
Black _Mountain
Buncombe Co.
Buncombe Co. (Ricevil1e)
Canton
Clyde
Ha,ze1wood
Lake Junealuska
Maggie Valley
Montreat
Waynesvil1e (Haywood Co.)
OKLAHOMA
Clinton
Elk City
PENNSYLVANIA (cont'd)
Ruscombmanor
Salisbury (Twp)
*Shiremanstown
*Silver Spring
Steel ton (Boro)
Stockertown
*Strayban
Sugarcreek (Boro)
Susquehanna (Twp)
Swatara (Twp)
Tulley town (Boro)
*Upper Allen
Upper Milford
Upper Southampton (Twp)
Warminster
(Twp)West Easton
West Fairview (Boro)
West Hanover (Twp)
William
Wilson
Wormleysburg (Boro)
PENNSYLVANIA
Bensa1em (Twp)
Bethlehem
*Biglerville
*Butler
*Carro1l
Camp Hill (Boro)
Cornplanter
Cranberry
*Cumberland
Dauphin (Boro)
East Pennsboro
Easton
Emmaus
*Fairview
Falls (Twp»
Fleetwood
Forks Township
*Gettysburg
Glendon
Hampden (Twp)
Highshire (Boro)
Harrisburg
Lemoyne (Boro)
*Lower Allen
Lower Macungie
Lower Mt. Bethel
Lower Paxton (Twp)
Lower Southampton
Lower Swatara (Twp)
~1acung ie
Maiden Creek
r1arysville (Boro') TEXAS
*Mechanicsburg Benbrook
rHddle Paxton (Twp) Blue Mound
Middletown (Boro) Borger
*Monroe Township Burleson
Morrisvil1e (Boro) Clebrne
New Cumberland (BoroCrowley
Oakland (Twp) Denton
Oil City Duncanvil1e
Palmer Edgecliff Village
paxtang (Boro) *Everman
Pennbrook (Boro) Forest Hill
Plainfield Fort Worth
Richmond Fritch
Roseville (Boro) *Ha1tom City
Roya1ton (Boro) Highland Park
TENNESSEE
Bristol
Carter Co.
Cocke Co.
Elizabethton
Hamblen Co.
Johnson City
Morristown
Newport
Sullivan Co.
Washington Co.
-23-
.,,--,
--
--
HERBST & THUE, LTD.
TEXAS (cont'd)
Hurst
Keller
Kenneda1e
Lake
Worth
*Mansfield
McLean
*Midlothian
*North Richland Hills
Pampa
Panhandle
Richland Hills
Saginaw
Stinnett
Sunray/Dumas
University Park
Watauga
*Waxahachie
Weatherford
Westover Hills
White Deer
White Settlement
VIRGINIA
Alleghany Co.
Bristol
Clifton Forge
Colonial Heights
Covington
Fort Lee
Iron Gate
Petersburg
Washington Co.
WASHINGTON
Adams Co.l
Ephrata
Grant Co.
Moses Lake
othello
Soap Lake
-24-
-',
-Line
iF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
'9
'-c:::0
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
.35
36 ,
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
"5
'-46
47
48
49
50
51
-.---- ... .--
. ,-':rro
EXHIBIT) 2
Financial Analysis - CBS/ Black Hawk Cable Communications
Profitability & Rate of Return Analysis
---------------------------------------
November 19, 1985
Profit & Loss: ($)
1983
1984
----------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
~ Months
to 4/30/85
4 Months
to 4/30/85
Annualized
Less: Operating Expenses
5,736,346 5,812,824 1,938,087 5,814,261
5,487,097 5,758,555 1,837,649 5,512,947
Revenues
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
95.65
249,249 54,269 100,438 301,314
Operating Profit
Operating Ratio (%)
Depreciation/Amortization (D/Á)
99.07
1,607,160
287,114
1,724,526 _
248,415
Interest Expense
94.82
578,895
,76,692
94.82
1,736,685
230,076
Net Income Before Taxes
-1,645,025 -1,918,672
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
-555,149 -1,665,447
Add back D/A to get Cash Flow
-194,146
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
71 ,238
-37,865
23,746
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate of Return - CBS:
-----------------------------------
CBS Investment in Black Hawk ($)
Actual Pretax Rate of Return (%)
14,434,487 14,740,217 14,634,558 14,634,558
-11 .40 -13.02 n/ a -11 .38
Net Income Needed to Produce
a 15% Rate of Return ($)
2,165,173 2,211,032 n/a 2,195,184
Earnings Needed Above Actual
to Achieve a 15% ROR ($)
3,810,198 4,129,704 n/a 3,860,631
Rate of Return - Sammons: ' Low High,
----------------------------------- ----------- -----------
Indtcated Purchase Price ($)" -18,000,000 22,000,000
Pretax Income Needed to Cover
Sammons' Interest Cost @ 9.5% ($) 1,710,009 2,090,000
Earnings Needed Above Actual 3,375,447 3,755,447
to Cover Interest Costs ($)
Net Income Needed to Produce
a 15% Rate of Return to
Sammons ($) 2,700,000 3,300,000
Earnings Needed Above Actual
to Achieve a 15%'ROR ($) 4,365,447 4,965,447
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - NOVEMBER 11, 1985 - 7:30 P.M.
'---
1. Mayor Echols called the meeting to order November 11, 1985,
at 7:30 p.m.
2. Present:
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
Virginia Moody
Jim Ramsey
'--
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Lee Maness
Gene Riddle
John Whitney
Richard Royston
Richard Albin
Marjorie Nash
Don Bowen
Press:
David Ray
Mark England
Chris Williams
Absent:
Jim Kenna
Harold Newman
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilwoman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
Finance Director
Public Works Director
Purchasing Agent
Director of Planning
City Engineer
Planning & Zoning Member
Planning & Zoning Member
Northeast Chronicle
Mid Cities
Fort Worth Star Telegram
Councilman
Councilman
3. Mayor Pro Tem Davis gave the invocation.
Representative Bill Carter presented Mayor Pro Tern Davis
with a citation from the State of Texas on his recent
honor of being elected "Young Surveyor of the Year".
4. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of
October 28, 1985.
Motion carried 5-0.
5. Councilwoman Hinkle removed Item No. 15 from the Consent
Agenda.
'--
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he would like to point out that
Item #18 on the Consent Agenda pertaining to the bonds
saved the citizens $722,000 which speaks well of the City
Staff.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
SPECIAL PRESENTATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 28, 1985
APPROVED
REMOVAL OF ITEMS(S)
FROM THE CONSENT
AGENDA
'--
Mayor Echols stated that the City's bond rating at the
present time was an A+.
6. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
7. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Jim McKenzie, representing the owner, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. McKenzie stated that they felt this zoning would be
compatible for the area. Mr. McKenzie they planned to build
an automotive strip center on the site. Mr. McKenzie stated
they would meet all of the requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Councilwoman Moody asked what kind of automotive center it
would be.
'--
Mr. McKenzie stated they would do repairs and tune-ups.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
8. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
approve Ordinance No. 1303.
Motion carried 5-0.
9.
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mark Long, Engineer, representing the owners, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Long stated that he was available to answer any questions
the Council might have on this zoning request.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Long if agreed to the 1800
square foot restriction placed on this request by the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
'--
Mr. Long stated yes.
November 11, 1985
Page 2
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEMS(S) INDICATED BY
ASTERISK (16, 17, 18,
19, 20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 25, 26, 27, 28,
29, 29a, 30 & 31)
APPROVED
PZ 85-114 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
JOHN KENWORTHY TO
REZONE LOTS 10 AND
11, NORTH EDGLEY
ADDITION FROM C-l
(COMMERCIAL) AND R-2
(SINGLE FAMILY) TO
C-2 (COMMERCIAL)
(LOCATED ON THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF
GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY AND
KEN MICHAEL COURT)
ORDINANCE NO. 1303
APPROVED
PZ 85-116 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
JACK ROSEBERRY AND
LEE BONHAM TO REZONE
TRACT 4C, J.B. EDEN
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 499
FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO R-2 (SINGLE
FAMILY) (LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF EDEN
ROAD NORTH OF THE ST.
LOUIS AND
SOUTHtVESTERN
RAILROAD)
'---'
Mayor Echols asked if the street would be constructed as the
Planning & Zoning Commission required for future development.
Mr. Long stated yes.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
10. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Ordinance No. 1304 as recommended by the Planning &
Zoning Commission.
Motion carried 5-0.
11.
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Herman Smith, owner, appeared before the Council.
"---
Mr. Smith showed the Council a layout of the surrounding
property. Mr. Smith stated this would combine the subject
tract with the existing commercial properties on the south.
Mr. Smith stated this would also allow him and Mr. Barfield to
work together on the drainage problem in the area.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
12. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to
approve Ordinance No. 1305.
Motion carried 5-0.
13. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Herman Smith, owner, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Smith stated that these lots were adjacent to the lots
that Burk Collins recently rezoned. Mr. Smith stated that he
and Mr. Collins would work together on the drainage problem
in the area.
'---
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
November 11, 1985
Page 3
ORDINANCE NO. 1304
APPROVED
PZ 85-117 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
HERMAN J. SMITH TO
REZONE LOTS 1, 2A-Rl,
2A-R2, 2-Rl, AND
2-R2, BLOCK 3,
WOODBERT ADDITION
FROM R-3 (SINGLE
FAMILY) TO C-l
(COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED
ON THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF DAVIS
BOULEVARD AND SAYERS
LANE)
ORDINANCE NO. 1305
APPROVED
PZ 85-118 PLANNING &
ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - REQUEST OF
HERMAN J. SMITH TO
REZONE LOTS 16, 17,
AND 18, RICHLAND OAKS
ADDITION FROM R-l
(SINGLE FAMILY) TO
C-l (COMMERCIAL)
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF LOOP 820 AND
BEDFORD EULESS ROAD
AT OAKRIDGE TERRACE)
--
14. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
approve Ordinance No. 1306.
Motion carried 5-0.
15. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Line stated that when the Zoning Ordinance was approved
approximately two years ago it did not include the
classification of bowling alleys. Mr. Line stated that
an inquiry had been received about a bowling alley and
the Planning and Zoning Commission decided that it
needed to be in the classification of C-l.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed
the Public Hearing.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman
Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1307.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked what impact this would be on
parking regulations.
'-
Mr. Don Bowen, Chairman of the Planning & Zoning
Commission, stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission
would look into this.
Motion carried 5-0.
*16.
*17.
November 11, 1985
Page 4
ORDINANCE NO. 1306
APPROVED
PZ 85-119 AMENDMENT
TO ZONING ORDINANCE
111080 REGARDING
BOWLING ALLEYS,
ORDINANCE NO. 1307
APPROVED
PS 85-79 REQUEST OF
R.G.A. DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY FOR FINAL
PLAT APPROVAL OF FAIR
OAKS ESTATES, 2ND
FILING (LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF BURSEY ROAD AND
SMITHFIELD ROAD)
APPROVED
GN 85-106 APPROVAL OF
FINANCIAL ADVISORY
SERVICE CONTRACT WITH
FIRST SOUTHWEST
COMPANY OF DALLAS,
RESOLUTION NO. 85-29
APPROVED
November 11, 1985
Page 5
*18. GN 85-107 AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE AND SALE
'-- OF $13,975,209.40 GO
REFUNDING AND
IMPROVEMENT BONDS,
SERIES 1985, AND
APPROVAL OF AN ESCROW
AGREEMENT WITH TEXAS
AMERICAN BANK, FORT
WORTH, ORDINANCE NO.
1309
APPROVED
*19. GN 85-108 APPROVING
THE PAYING AGENT
REGISTRAR AGREEMENT
WITH TEXAS AMERICAN
BANK, FORT WORTH,
RESOLUTION NO. 85-30
APPROVED
*20. GN 85-109 AMENDMENT
TO PERSONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH CITY
MANAGER
APPROVED
',--
*21. GN 85-110 ADOPTING
ARTICLE 6252-19,
SECTION 14, TEXAS
TORTS CLAIMS ACT,
ORDINANCE NO. 1308
APPROVED
*22. PU 85-44 APPROVAL OF
RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALIGNMENT AND
ACQUISITION - WATAUGA
ROAD - RUFE SNOW
DRIVE TO DAVIS BLVD.
APPROVED
*23. PU 85-45 REJECTION OF
BIDS FOR STREET
SWEEPING AND APPROVAL
OF CITY OPERATED
PROGRAM
APPROVED
*24. PU 85-46 BID AWARD
FOR ONE PURSUIT
VEHICLE TO SAM
'-- LINGARD FORD IN THE
AMOUNT OF $9,977.09
APPROVED
November 11, 1985
Page 6
*25.
PU 85-47 AWARD OF BID
FOR EIGHT VEHICLES TO
JACK WILLIAMS
CHEVROLET IN THE
AMOUNT OF $75,936.00
APPROVED
'-.
*26.
PU 85-48 BID AWARD
FOR ONE SYSTEM 36
MODEL 5360 COMPUTER
TO IBM IN THE AMOUNT
OF $68,320.00
APPROVED
*27.
PW 85-47 AWARD OF BID
ON SMITHFIELD ACRES
ADDITION DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO
HUFFMAN CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT
OF $74,847.80
APPROVED
*28.
PAY 85-53 FINAL
PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #5
TO P&R CONSTRUCTION
CO., IN THE AMOUNT OF
$29,341.82 - BIG
FOSSIL CREEK SANITARY
SEWER WATAUGA TRUNK
LINE, PHASE II
APPROVED
'--
*29.
PAY 85-54 PARTIAL
PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #4,
TO LCH CONSTRUCTION
CO., IN THE AMOUNT OF
$7,845.64 - MORGAN
MEADOWS EAST DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*29a. Item added to Agenda November 8~ 1985.
PAY 85-57 PARTIAL
PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #1,
TO APAC-TEXAS, INC.
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$186,906.61 - CHAPMAN
DRIVE PAVING AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
'---
November 11, 1985
Page 7
*30.
PAY 85-55 PARTIAL
PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #2,
TO APAC-TEXAS, INC.
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$154,607.73 - CHAPMAN
DRIVE PAVING AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
'--
*31.
PAY 85-56 PARTIAL
PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #4,
TO P&R PAVING INC.,
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$67,595.64 - HEWITT
STREET PAVING AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
32. None
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
Councilman Ramsey stated that he felt the Police and Fire
Departments needed to be complimented on their handling of
the bonfire for Richland High School.
33. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to ADJOURNMENT
adjourn.
'-
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
',,-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
-r
Department:
Administration
Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Agenda Number: PZ 85-121
Subject:
Request for an Appeal Hearin~ on PZ 85-121
If Council grants the request for an appeal hearing, the hearing can be heard
December 23, 1985.
Recommendation:
Set date for hearing.
....
- ''-~
~
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N I A
Sufficient Funds Available
-
/J
f< 111 /~
,
Department Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
\...-
.'"",
,..'.c."A'<'?~O, "11:-'~~~')%'.,
Page 1 of
1
'-,
November 19, 1985
Mr. Rodger Line
City Manager
P.O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Mr. Line:
I wish to appeal the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on
case number PZ85-121, and request this to be put on the next available
agenda of the City Council.
/
-
.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Administration
Subject: Request for an Appeal Hearing on PZ 85-126
Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Agenda Number: PZ 85-126
If Council grants the request for an appeal hearing, the hearing can be heard
December 23, 1985.
Recommendation:
Set date for hearing.
~
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/A
Sufficient Funds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
~
~./
R11/~
City Manager
, Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
1
P'·z '7,:' /)'
/...; ,';
BURK COLLINS INVESTMENTS
',,--
5228 RUFE SNOW
INVESTMENTS
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118
SHOPPING CENTERS HOMES
WAREHOUSES
(817) 498-5489
OIL & GAS
November 15, 1985
Ms. Jeanette Rewis
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 18609
N. Richland Hills, TX 76118
Dear Ms. Rewis;
Please use this letter as a formal request to be placed on
the agenda at the City Council meeting scheduled for November
25, 1985.
~'
The purpose of our request is to appeal the decision by the
Planning and Zoning Commission to deny the special use permit
by Sea Galley Restaurant for the sale of alcoholic beverages.
Jeanette, if you have any questions on this matter, please
don't hesitate to give us a call. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
L~~~
Burk Collins
BC/sc
---
~..I.
,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
11/25/85
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PS 85-78
Subject:
Request of Wright Construction Company for Final
Plat of Steeple Ridge Estates
This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Steeple Ridge Estates. The
property is located on the north side of Shady Grove Road west of Davis Boulevard. The
purpose for the proposed plat is to create a single family subdivision in conformance
with the R-2 District criteria.
~
In the preliminary review of the plat by the Engineer and the Staff several areas of
concern were expressed to be addressed on the Final Plat.
(1) The location of the property requires that sewer service be provided by means
of a lift station arrangement within the subdivision which would then transport the
sewage to an off-site main located south of Shady Grove Road. The applicants have
provided for the portion of the sewer system within the subdivision but have not
completed negotiations with the off-site property owners for the routing of the sewer.
The plat cannot be fully approved until the proper documents and plans have been provided
by the applicants verifying the location of the off-site sewer main.
(2) The Thoroughfare Plan designates Shady Grove Road as a six lane divided
Principal Arterial Street. The location of the subject property in relation to the
proposed alignment of the revised Shady Grove Road would seem to indicate that no right
of way will be required from the proposed subdivision. However, no engineering
determination has been made as to the exact alignment of the future thoroughfare making
it difficult to determine whether this property should be involved in the development of
'-' the street.
The remainder of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and zoning Commission approved the Final Plat of Steeple Ridge Estates as
presented in Plat Application PS 85-78 subject to the Engineer's comments.
l
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Oper 'ng Budget
er
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
l
1-,
l
¡(ft/~
ent Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
~."'"Ii_:,~.;i..,,,,:\,,.:;
Page 1 of_ ~
'. . .',,..o';l:¡;..;;;.'¡t<''''....,..:;,\''',;...,,.-.
-
.'
...
.'
,
,-
i \
PS eS-n
sr=éP~E R'''6&;
ESTATes ,~ -
5.1,'2,:5
R-2
1195
~'''~ÜI''
~
. fí,~ I
v-
. I
~
I
; o~'
¡k"i,..
~v
~ ,
I ! '
_L
,.o...~
AG
1198
,.---<J.WI I
, I I ru'ill-:-lì
e-"-: : I: I
: .~ î~=ð
:: . I=-- i-
,.... , ,....._,-õ--J ,--' ,
..-~".rR-2 J : d
, ,I"M~'
; 'r-..l...-_~~
, -~:-
-.:.-..r:'~
Ii --
.r-
-
/
AG
AG
0-1
1220
.... ,I-...
~,-
,
'-
r
-.>
11".11:
I
AG .,;.
I ...... ~.,L
~. .
I ~ /
w/
v/
. A--C-1
jLJ
AG
~u~~f .-iT-
¡fTl'
11 ' J
1: . ¡
I' , i
, '
~; ~~!
\'. i .;
,,"U .
.,. '-
.'
AG
\ .
,~
1
,
.
..
0-1
'('G4
AG
:......1.
r-'~-::=- ,"
Ii
~
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
NOVEMBER 14, 1985 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
DERATION OF THE MINUTES
OCTOBER 24, 1985
g was called to order by the
Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M.
RESENT:
Chairman
Secretary
Members
Don Bowen
John Schwinger
Mark Wood
Marjorie Nash
Joe Hallford
Carole Flippo
Richard Royston
Wanda Calvert
Alt. Member
Dir. Planning & Dev.
P & Z Coordinator
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the
motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Wood and
Mr. Schwinger abstaining since they
were not present at the meeting.
-
',,---
1.
PS 85-78
PS 85-78
APPROVED
2.
PS 85-82
PS 85-82
APPROVED
.,..-
.-----
-.-
3.
PS 85-86
~/
--*\",.....
Request of Wright Construction Company
for final plat of Steeple Ridge
Estates.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85078 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Jeff Marsh for final plat
of Block 23, Kingswood Estates.
Mr. Schwinger made the m n to
approve ps 85-82. s motion was
seconded by allford and the
motion ried 5-0.
Request of Arnold V. Pent, III for
final plat of Lot 2, Block 7,
Richfield Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-86. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
'--
~tarne) &
^SSOCJatôs
Consulting Engineers
',--"
Charles G. Starnes P.E.
Tommy D. Burks R.P.S.
Thomas A. Harris
R D. Henderson RP.S.
John R Powell
"---
CHARLES G. SrNES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
'. .
PLANNING
SURVEYING
ENGINEErG
November 6, 1985
Mr. Richard Royston
Director of Planning/Development
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 85027 Steeple Ridge Estates
Second Submittal
City Ref. No. 3-868
Dear Mr. Royston
We have revised our plat and plans in accordance
with your first review and the respective comments.
This letter accompanying our second submittal
is to address the comments from Mr. Richard
Albin's October 16th letter of review to the
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of
North Richland Hills.
Comment responses:
1,2 The plat has been executed and notarized
by all the concerned parties.
3. The present zoning of R-2, 9,000 square feet
single family district has been shown on
the plat.
4. Lot 27, Block 1 and Lot 11, Block 3 have
been checked and adjusted where they comply
with the 110-foot minimum average depth.
Lot 15, Block 3 has been checked and verified
that it complies with the 9,000 square feet
minimum lot size for R-2 zoning.
5,6 The 33-inch storm drain line in Saddle Ridge
Drive has been extended to the South and
to the West between Lots 18 and 19 of Block
1200 Copeland Road, Suite 408, Arlington, TX 76011, (Metro) 265-2681, 817/277-6421
-. ,
',-
',---,
',,--
(~
r
Mr. Richard Royston-Page 2
November 6, 1985
1 for future development. A 6-inch sanitary
sewer line has also been extended to the
West between Lots 18 and 19. Both of these
lines have been placed within a 15-feet
drainage and utility easement as shown on
the drainage and utility easement as shown
on the final plat.
7,8 Instead of extending our present storm drain
system to pick up the run off from drainage
area "B-1a" in the Southeast corner of our
subdivision, it was agreed to provide flumes
from Mill Creek Court, Tanglewood Court
and Trails Edge Court to take care of this.
These flumes are placed within a 10-feet
drainage easement as shown on the final
'plat except for the 15-foot drainage and
utility easement shown from Trails Edge
Court. Our sewer system was extended with
a 6-inch line to service this area and is
placed in that easement.
9.
Off-site sanitary sewer plans have not been
prepared at this time because a specific
alignment has not been determined as yet.
We have contacted the property owner to
the South of Shady Grove Road to coordinate
with his proposed development, but he is
out-of-town at this time and no determination
has been made. It is our intention to pick
up our on-site sewer system and extend to
the South by gravity through the South
property owner's proposed plans and tie
into the existing TRA sewer trunk main.
10. ,Our plans have been transmitted to the State
Health Department for review and approval
of our lift station and force main. I have
requested that they send a copy of this
review to you for your records.
11. The proposed 20-foot drainage and utility
easement located on the East side of Lot
34, Block 1 has been revised and shown
on the final plat as a 30-foot right-of-
way. Lot 34 has been revised accordingly
,'~
<"'~~ >.J~""I>'¡~.'...._iI"; ,-'. h',.....,¡,..-,
-~.:...'Ii:~' :-.",~
./;;,:.:.::....:,,;.;..., >;.J,<~
,;"""'.~c.....,·.-t'Ä·,', ....:,
(
(
Mr. Richard Royston Page-3
November 6, 1985
and shown on the plat.
12. a. Regarding the right-of-way and prorata
costs of the future alignment and im-
provements to Shady Grove Road, this
is to be coordinated with the future
development to the South of Shady Grove.
b. The engineer's certificate of drainage
has been placed on the drainage layout
sheet of the plans, Sheet 11 of 26.
c. The fire hydrant radii zones have
been shown on the water system layout,
Sheet 18 of the plans. These zones
were shown using the required 500-feet
radius for single-family.
d. Our client has not received a letter
of permissions from the owners of "Estes
Place Tract" for the storm water discharging
on their property.
As we have discussed, we are requesting approval
of our final plat and construction plans subject
to staff approval of the "off-site sewer system."
Our client is determined to work out a solution
with the South property owner regarding this
matter, but has not been able to do so at this
time. Your consideration of this request and
recommendation to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council for approval, is
appreciated.
Thank you.
Very truly yours
~w--¡2~/<-L-.
J n R. Powell
G aduate Engineer
JRP/ah
En c 1.
'--/
cc: Mr. Richard Albin, P.E.
Mr. Charles G. Starnes, P.E.
Mr. Joe L. Wright
~." . "."....' .
---_.----.~.,
"
"-...,
~ - ..
(,)
1-
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
October 16, 1985
1 Planning and Zoning Commission
, Cì~y of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
1
2
'!
,,-. .)
4
'-
RE: 3-868, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
STEEPLE RIDGE ESTATES,
1, 2 AND 3,
FINAL PLAT,
PS 85 - 78, GRID MAP 17
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following
C ormlent s:
The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification
should be fully executed before approval of this plat.
A surveyor's signature should be affixed to the plat.
The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat.
Lots 27 block 1 and lot 11 block 3 appear to be less than the 110-foot minimum
average depth and lot 15 block 3 appears to be less than the 9,000 square foot
minimum for R-2 zoning.
5 An existing drainage swale passes through this proposed subdivision in a
northeasterly direction roughly from lot 18, block 1 to lot 32, block 1. We would
recommend that a storm drain be extended westward from Saddle Ridge Drive between
~ots 18 and 19 of block 1 to pick up the off-site runoff and put it underground
into the proposed storm drain system in Saddle Ridge Drive. When the area west of
this proposed subdivision develops,this storm drain between lots 18 and 19 can be
extended as required. We wOl'lld recommend at least a 31-inch diameter pipe between
lots 18 and 19, and the proposed 33-inch line in Saddle Ridge should be extended
southward to pick up the recommended 31-inch storm drain. A drainage and utility
easement should be provided between lots 18 and 19.
6 We would also recommend that a sanitary sewer line be extended westward between
lots 18 and 19 for future service to the property west of this proposed
åevelopment.
7 We would further recommend that a storm drain be extended to pick up off-site
runoff from drainage area IIB-1a". Runoff from thi s area wi 11 be trapped by future
fences located along lots 3 through 16, block 2, and lots 24 and 25 of block 2.
The proposed 24-inch storm drain located at the intersection of Saddle Ridge Drive
and Windy Ridge Drive will have to be extended in some manner to pick up this
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 7602,·8,7/283-62". METRO/267-3367
()
\
Subdivision Review Letter continued
STEEPLE RIDGE ESTATES
off-site flow which will probably be concentrated at the southwest corner of lot
24, block 2.
8 A sanitary sewer line should be extended to serve the area IIB-lall noted in the
previous item.
9 Off-site sanitary sewer plans should be provided showing where the proposed
sanitary sewer force main is going to be connected.
10 We would recommend that the proposed sanitary sewer lift station plans be
transmitted to the Health Department for review and recommendation of approval.
11 The proposed 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement located on the east side
of lot 34, block 1, should be widened to 30 feet. Also, since the proposed lift
station is located at the northeast corner of lot 34, we would recommed that the
easement be dedicated as right-of-way to the City of North Richland Hills so the
Public Works Department will have unrestricted access to the lift station for
maintenance and repairs.
12 Please see our review letter dated June 4, 1985, PS 85-34, items 2 and 3
regarding Shady Grove Road right-of-way and prorata, item 4, regarding engineer1s
certification, item 5, regarding fire hydrant radii, and item 7, regarding letter
of permission from owners of IIEstes Place Tractll for concentrated discharge of
storm water.
',---
13 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is
responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance,
Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development
Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed
upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in
writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this prqposed plat is approved. If no
such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains
responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the
regulatory codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
f!u4adßJ, ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
'-
October 16, 1985
PS 85 - 78
PAGE
2
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
',-,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
June 4, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-868, CITY OF NORTH R¡CHLAND HILLS
STEEPLE RIDGË ESTATES,
BLOCKS 1, 2 AND 3,
PRELIMINARY PLAT,
PS 85 - 34, GRID MAP '8, 17'
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 Since this proposed plat is contiguous with the "Brentwood Estates
Addition", we would recommend that the subdivision name be changed from
"Steeple Ridge Estates Addition" to the "Brentwood Estates Addition" and
the lot and block numbers revised accordingly.
2 Shady Grove Road is designated as an M6D Thoroughfare in the new
~ Thoroughfare Plan. A minimum right-of-way width of 110 feet is required
and a 6-12 foot lane pavement section with a minimum 18-foot median is
also required. We would note, however, that the Thoroughfare Plan shows
Shady Grove Road to begin curving southward at a point on the existing
street alignment west of this proposed development as required to
intersect Davis Blvd. at a 90-degree angle. We would suggest that the
developers of this proposed subdivision co~rdinate their planning with the
owners of the property south ,of Shady Grove Road to determine the exact
location of the future Shady Grove alignment. Steeple Ridge Drive should
be extended southward to intersect the future alignment of Shady Grove
Road.
3 The developers should escrow their prorata share of future Shady Grove
paving improvements or construct such improvements themselves at this
time, depending upon the results of coordination with the owners south of
Shady Grove Road. Detailed plans and profiles of any such thoroughfare
construction should be provided for review.
4 In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer's
Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan:
4.1 I, , a professional engineer registered in
the State ot lexas, have prepared this drainage study in
compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria
of the City of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the
-
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283·6211 . METRO/267.3367
Subdivision Review Lett~ continued
~rEEPLE RIDGE ESTATES
topographic information used in this study is in compliance with
s,aid requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this
workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented
through proper subsequent detailed construction planning.
SIGNATURE
, P.E. SEAL
5 Fire hydrant coverage of the entire proposed platted area based on a
SOD-foot radius requirement should be shown on the utility layout sheet.
6 Lot lines of all contiguous platted subdivisions should be shown on the
plat.
7 A letter of permission from the owners of the "Estes Place Tracts" should
be obtained for concentrated discharge of stormwater on their property.
Also, easements should be obtained, as required, for any off-site storm
drain or open channel construction work. The developer's engineer should
verify that the off-site channel or watercourse has at least a 10-year
minimum capacity for handling the concentrated discharge. Cross-sections
and calculations should be shown on the plans.
8 100-year combined storm drain and overland relief capacity should be
provided for all storm drains and streets within the proposed building lot
lines. Sections and calculations should be provided to verify that such
',- capacity is being provided. Minimum finished floor elevations shall be
set at least 1.5 feet above all 100-year water surface elevations. (See
attached sketches).
9 The proposed 6-inch water lines in Steeple Ridge Drive, Trails Edge, and
the section of Saddle Ridge Drive east of the intersection of Trails Edge
should be increased from 6-inch diameters to 8-inch.
10 The developer is proposing to discharge on-site sewage to a proposed lift
station located in the northeast corner of this development. The plans do
not show where the off-site force main is going and where the gravity
outfall line is located to which this proposed development is being
sewered. All off-site sewer plans should be submitted for review along
with proposed lift station design details. We would note that sanitary
sewer discharge into the City of Keller would require approval of both
Councils of Keller and North Rich1and Hills along with the State Health
Department. The Public Works Departments of both Cities should be
consulted regarding this matter.
11 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
-
June 4, 1985
PS 85 - 34
PAGE
2
Subdivision Review Lett~ continued
~rEEPLE RIDGE ESTATES
,~
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Pleoal~,if YOUhave7 ~
~ .
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
"--
'--
June 4, 1985
PS 85 - 34
PAGE
3
£.
f
EXISTING 1CO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
MINH-'IM EASEMENT WIDTH IF ACCESS RAMP
. TO CHANNEL BOTTOM IS PROVIDED
(INCREASE EASEMENT qo-FEET IF RAMP
HOT PROVIDED)
IMPROVED 1CO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
¡EXISTING 1CO-YEAR
WATER SURFACE
-------
}-FENCE HOUSE
: L
FENCE
------- _..J2..__
1 FT. .'
1.5' MIN. ~
ï;ROVËDI oo-y;;'"R r t
WA TER SURFACE 7'
EXISTING CHANNEL
SECTION BEFORE
IMPROVEMENTS
LEVEE
ROPOSED CONCRETE
CHANNEL LINER
PONDING
BEHIND
LEVEE
( loo-YEAR)
FULL IOO-YEAR C.ONCRETE CHANNEL LINER
IMPROVED loo-YEAR FLOOD PLA IN
(ADD ~FEET FOR EASEMENT WIDTH)
EXISTING (XI-YEAR {IMPROVED loo-YEAR
--,:ATER ':R:':Eì_ ~T~U~C~_
I~~ 1.5' MIN.
r ---;:;EA~ATER-- .LI~:--T
l:!It _S~CE (~ST)~
FILL
ROPOSED CONCRETE CHANNEL
LINER (EXTEND LINER TO
NA TURA L GROUND - 25 YEAR M IN.
CAPACITY REQUIRED)
PARTIAL IOO;'YEAR CONCRETE CHANNEL LINER
~,~
EX ISTI NG
HA ruRAL
GROUND
IMPROVED loo-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
(ADD qo-FEET FOR EASEMENT WIDTH)
PROPOSED
EARTHEN CHANNEL
--7 - - --:"_--3l.. --
EXISTING
I CO-YEAR PILOT 1.5' MIN.
WATER SURFACE CHANNEL I
f
EXCAVATIO~
_ ..n..-
'--
EARTHEN CHANNEL WITH CONCRETE PILOT
FIGURE 1
"-
(
BUILDING, SETBACK WIDTH
L
(
IMPROVED IOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (~X. SPREAD)
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
HOUSE
25-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (MAX. SPREAD)
-----_...L.-___
I. 5' MIN.
25-YEAR WATER SURFACE
MINIMUM 5-YEAR DESIGN
OVERSIZE AS REQUIRED
(10, 25, 50, 75-YEAR) TO
~INTAIN 25 AND IOO-YEAR
SPRE~D LIMITS SHOWN ABOVE
UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN CONDUIT
STORM DRAIN IN STREET
'--
25-YEAR WATER SURFACE
(NOT MAJOR WATERCOURSE)
r
I
I
- I
I
I
I
PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
l
I
I
I
I
HOU3E
IMPROVED lOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN LIMITS
lOO-YEAR WATER SURFACE
1.5' 1~_
1.5' IJ.IN.
'-oVERLAND R~;-\""" L
F.F.
STREET
<',---
OVERSIZE AS REQUIRED
(10, 25, 50, 75-YEAR) TO
~ INTA IN IOO-YEAR FLOOD
PLAIN liMITS WITHIN EASEMENT
(M4Y REPLACE PIPE WITH CONCRETE
CHANNEL IF GREATER THAN OR EQUAL
TO 60-INCH DIA.)
OVERLAND RELIEF
SWAlE -- LINE WITH
CONCRETE OR OTHER
M4 TER IAl APPROVED
BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN CONDUIT
STORM DRAIN IN EASEMENT
FIGURE 2
~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
Council Meeting Date:
11/25/85
Subject:
Request of Jeff Marsh for Final Plat of
Block 23, K1ngswood ~states
PS 85-82
Agenda Number:
This Final Plat application is presented for consideration of Block 23, Kingswood
Estates. The property is located on the north side of Starnes Road west of Kingswood
Court. The purpose for the proposed plat is to subdivide the property into single family
lots in conformance with the R-2 District criteria.
The Thoroughfare Plan designates Starnes Road as a two lane Collector Street requiring 60
feet of right of way. The proposed plat indicates an additional dedication of five feet
which, if matched by the development of the property on the south side of the street,
will provide the necessary right of way. The applicant also proposes to enter into a
contract with the City for the future assessment of his portion of the costs of street
construction.
All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Final Plat of Block 23, Kingswood
Addition as submitted in Plat Application PS 85-82.
_\..-
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Opera ng Budget
Ot r
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
"-
fCl/IL/~
nt Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of 1
//~8ê - ~I/'\
f~"'~::~~- ->/ ~8~ L.r- íC C-2 \
_Uh_, ----.----r-'-'c.~~. .¡:::.. R-2-1800 il.
"53 :: ~i~~ r '212
.__h_h_ .___ ~.>-+--ot.PSßS-7'1
~..~ ~~~ ¡:Aj~ 04.'.$.. '
--,----__n___n ~. -~O;'.N~¡;I(.¡I'#. "
S·----u-- -= w.'::r- \ _ ,,,"--
'h---..·~~-h-,-- t:-:::; ,,::: R-2-lèõo f ~:
____un __h,__U ~--c.....,i-----:- li78 .
--~ ::::::, I ::::
-' , I, '- t::: .~ c.-L- _
I I'" ç:"" " ¡ . \.>
-.r . ." i,R-1 . ~'~ ~
~ '. ·.R' ,.1 .. I ,,'t,,'- : : ~ þ-f
1,\. : ,: ...,~t' ':-- i i l): i
bi "':.'~'t<~ -=
~' '1, ;.-' ~:----
..,....' ..,... i-""~ ~-;.--
~~,
--, ---< I .
~-~_.'v:-<. '__
I--~ -X /~_
I-- ~ =-, ~,::'^ __
--;- - -., v f'è."v·-- _ _
f-+-__ --"'{Y.__
~'~ --..(-. .f.-.... .,~ -
= ---",-' ~ '''~~--' L ---:t=
'-- ~, , ?'O-' -"'-
I--~, ~-,_L
~. .... I -- \{~~~
~,-; ... '~-8--=-':_
-~ r:$:!::, L=:t=-. --
=¡~ ~--~ =
I-- ~_'_.,_' . _::::::::::: .,"a ~~'
'- ~- ~-,'- - --;------.l-~-
, ~ c:!= ::;j¿. :. :::-_-.__;~ {-' " __
.::.-±~---- -- """... ~=:- .\
::::J.. L-",~ :;; -r-. ::..-::: --C' , . .
, : . -4- ,":J:::: ,'-r--'=::':-' ~.' ",. __ R _ 3 '- _. '.
~ I- -- t-----5---r-- i ~~.:._
~;~ ( N~~ t= ;:"~2 .~t<~ cr- _,;. ;..:'
nT,'~ H ~ · ~- f...=:l- d. " ,. ~
~~ ~¡ ~ I : ~'...;= I _ 2 1 c - 2 PC::~:' -:" _
P gç-;g r-+-f g ~ ,"h"'~ -~= . _= _ "'\ _
, ~-,
-'-i-~,::::j c-¡ c=::-~.:
==c........~~ c- ij ~ : ~
~e:,'" "=. ___ -:~R-:Ü~':: f-': '
-'I=ËSi 4E I ~.~"21t:~ ~ J.._
~~..::~ HMF Q~.~1+-: I -
~ ' , ." ¡ 0:-,,= I·~¿q:~, - -. 1.
~~/ ~~ . ,
'~ --~,--- I
~ ~~,~ 'i- I,. _ --=2 ~'~=. - ..; ~
-,-~~) ~~--:::;;r-:--::i::. =: =--::- _ _n _n -t- .~ . {-.', (
--I N ~ ''i'f1' ." <;. .,. - "11--. __ ~ ~ ~~"_,
- ~" ~ -- r--'----~_ ~,--: ~ ¡ .
- r- ~-:}.-=-=-- . -.---=-=- _ ~ --=-=--: _ ,'" J '.
- - ,-. '----It" "I., .V'
~ " -¡---- -~ -- r· -- I--- ----< t.... ~ i
- - . ~/""- t---J :-R-3 .r__ J
- "- ~- ": = =-~~: I::.: "1
,~~ .- R - 2 :i..-.-_~- - ,~,
~C-¥..'M=. _; ~ . , ~ .~ ~~~ :..~: ~
~ ~ - ......- ~ ,-- - - --=::: L__:: ::, . . ~1'
- i-roj;rÑ,j '"" . :::=:....,. -. --- ....
- . -:~,. '- -- =:.:..~ -::=::z-
AG [1 ,..-,..- t__ _ __ :n.!' L
Þ r--: ::¡. ' ';;_~:, ''''.'t--J '---=---'-___,
. S ~ ~ L -I- ~.-. L : R _ 3 __ _ .
d " I _ -.-
çv --~r I : ~- ..,. '~- --:-r~-I
~~---'- ~ ~~ ,i>;'~,_ "T"""'~ r_r_?
--- -- ,.........( J Þ. .\.:i..
:. R-I- ').'. , ~ _ _
_~-I:. ~_ 1800,S'I' C_? , R-3 ~. !
..
.
. ,
ð
- ,.
-
'--
h ..
- ~"
~~. :.
:
R~2 AG
-
R-3
1248
'r--
I
i ,~;~j
dC+H
, SE<J~\~
'-,:,4~'æ~,
('\ '(,;'-'( v r. ,
,-. -:¡ I1' I I ',"
- ~,~
.jC,:! ç
; "' ¡. .1=S~1. L_~'I--
:=:lIITIJ c:: ~~) ~..
JllLW ---'-::¡-
-'::rro=~~ .
~L-f-i~~'
L..W...:J '- 1--;: I I ..-, I'" 10'2
'--I T1 Pi ::::;\k.,!.J~5~ o¡ JJ H "',..-
:µ~ ':'""'~I~' \o~~~i=
, n,I"'::j'.... I ~~; r-
-I - ~II' Ii"
-, i '-~-.l LL -I ~ill-Lll_
~~~t~I~[ :'>~J~~
;~J:j, '~~! I , ~;c- R-V
I . ~~/ .-;-r~;r 1132J
~,' , /"-<-G.. .
~. .:. _·~v:.;~.
~~~~, '( '~~~c.l
-.-J"--:~~h" I '!!, I ,
' ~..l.,...;r-:.'--i I ''y ¡
-- I '-- ~j--, . ,., \·0 ,
:;:;,~ r- e:"E- . '1\ ' \--;
....--. ,--,1!1 .I'~""-;
¡~=ËA ,¡! =---it:
.,~ - 'ER'''-'-''j--
:_= ,I 11!'~..i
r:; -- -' - I !;: oCj
T~~öW- _~ ..:~' '~ -;-=-.
 .~' ;..t.: -": ~:t::J
.. -- -f-.~ __, _
. . ~:I~;'-
~--: --t--J-- s¡
ri~ -¡....;:~- r--< i-
~.:--",:",,"pI-"'7-·-
--:~.j-i --
___. ~:.,! /.,¡r- -
AG
-i
.~
AG
...
ZI
..
~
AG
~'---
;'
-----..:-..-
----
~
"
p
r
-
-
Î,
i
R-2
i!2~
-
r--
. I
I
I
co
-
~
-
-~
o
..
AG
~ T¡i1iU/1
~~€
~~§,-
-::::t~~,::
-!=~~±:.t
~ . ;..
-;t33CtIf=
::;:::~.........;-
-
"
'u '.
---:-'.:-
oZ ..J. ..' ~-.-:-_~. .
--..~- -~-r:;-.~~
r- ~ ~
.
-,-- , ---- --~
~
-,. _.__.._. ------ -
-
~
~':r---
. "
-
-
--
---
.
R-2
':"!
R-2
illS
AG
- ~
Q
..
--",",",",
- -"
t
AG
-
-
-i'S"fS"n i
~~¡ãM19.¡..~ .
10. tß.1 I'
¡ ¡
..:ar!t; '... .~
-
R-2
'I 7~
~--,
~_.-
AG
AG
¡.......;.¡." '
-
-
-
)
AG
.
~
=--- I
_d
, "
~ F· Õó
~~:-
"j~¡~. ··t'
-,~t .J=j ,
:¡,~.
, I
f¡1tpl~¡(~i~fþ...~ ""_"" "_:;., (,2St
:" AG U Â1.,.....,
. ~---~, u. ..;;..,
~l R~ .t
1.~~rtLR.. _ ~.~
·.-..-------
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
NOVEMBER 14, 1985 - 7:30 P. M.
'----
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF OCTOBER 24, 1985
\",.....
1.
//
/
PS 85-78
APPROVED
The meeting was called to or
Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7·
the
PRESENT:
Chairman
Secretary
Members
Don Bowen
John Schwinger
Mark Wood
Marjorie Nash
Joe Hallford
Carole Flippo
Richard Royston
Wanda Calvert
ember
Planning & Dev.
Z Coordinator
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the
motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Wood and
Mr. Schwinger abstaining since they
were not present at the meeting.
Request of Wright Construction Company
for final plat of Steeple Ridge
Estates.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85078 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
2.
PS 85-82
Request of Arnold V.
final plat of Lot 2,
Richfield Addit
~made the motion to approve
,- PS 85-86. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
. ,. ~......,- '-...~ ...-....-.~----.....
PS 85-82
APPROVED
3.
PS 85-86
:=:r---
~~.......-..-_..._-
Request of Jeff Marsh for final plat
of Block 23, Kingswood Estates.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve ps 85-82. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Hallford and the
motion carried 5-0.
:.:.~~JM~~9filLÓ"~~~::'ÌO":1~"'.;;i.:'
(;
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
~
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
November 4, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-840, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
KINGSWOOD ESTATES,
LOTS 1 THRU 16 BLOCK 23,
FINAL PLAT,
PS 85 - 82, GRID MAP 50
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 Please see our letter dated September 19, 1985, item 7, regarding
right-of-way dedication on the south side of Starnes Road, item 8,
regarding prorata for future improvements on Starnes Road, and item 13,
regarding prorata on 16-inch water line.
'-
2 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
- he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if thi s proposed pl at is approved. If no such speci fic
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
/2~1)/ fltt.:-
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
~ ,';
',,--
''--
2
3
4
5
6
7
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
September 19, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-840, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
KINGSWOOD ESTATES,
LOT 1-16 BLOCK 23,
PRELIMINARY PLAT,
PS 85 - 68. GRID MAP 50
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 We note that the plans submitted to our office for review are stamped
"Review Set, Not for Construction". Although this submittal is
preliminary, the plans submitted for review should accurately reflect
actual proposed construction. Any deviation from reviewed and
Commission/Council approved construction plans should be noted on
"As-built" plans and a copy of such as-builts transmitted to our office
and the City for updating permanent Public Works records.
The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of the final plat.
The surveyor's certification should be affixed to the final plat.
The distance along the south line on the plat is different from the
distance on the metes a~d bounds description.
The distances on lots 7 and 10 along Acts Court are not shown.
Zoning Commission Endorsement block should be affixed to the plat.
The right-of-way width of Starnes Road should be shown. Starnes Road is
a proposed C2U thoroughfare with a 60-foot right-of-way and 41-feet bib.
An additional 5-feet may be required from each side. Technically, the
Subdivision Ordinance states that the developer could be required to
acquire the additional right-of-way on the opposite side of street in
addition to his own dedication if you so direct.
8 The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street
and drainage improvements on Starnes Road or construct any required paving
improvements along the frontage of his property at this time. Detailed
plans and profiles of any such construction should be provided for review.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
',e-,::""j:..c..'''',r";:;",.3,'-JJF-·t...,
r
Subdivision Review Le~ ~r continued
(1
KINGSWOOD ESTATES
\
'--
9 The existing zoning for this development should be noted on the Plat.
10 The size of utility easements should be noted on the plat. What is a
G. U. Easement?
11 The sanitary sewer services should be moved to the center of the lots.
12 A plan and profile of the sanitary sewer and street should be included
in the final construction plans.
13 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing
16-inch water line in Starnes Road. We would estimate prorata at $5.50
per linear foot for one-half of an equivalent 8-inch line for a total
length of 375.72 feet.
14 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
,
Please
have
,a~ns.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
September 19, 1985
PS 85 - 68
PAGE
2
";;:;",-,,<.¡, ~ -..~
L
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PS 85-85
11/25/85
UUbject:
Request of Century Building Construction for
Replat of part of Block 4, Northridge Addition
This Replat Application is presented for consideration of part of Block 4, Northridge
Addition. The property is located on the northeast corner of Harwood Road and Bob
Street. The subject tract was approved as an R-6-T Townhouse Project on a PD Site Plan
submitted at an earlier meeting. The purpose ~or the proposed plat is to create lots
~thin the subdivision in conformance ~th the layout of that approved Site Plan.
All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat of Block 4, Northridge Addition as
submitted in Plat Application PS 85-85.
\-
l
l
l
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
l ~ gper~t' g Budget
K~~
Head Signature I -. Ity Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
1
'--
: !h,,,_~~~;,..:,>:;::-:¡,;,~,,~i:,.,
page ..1 of
1
\\
- - I~ .~ .' \ ",
/. ".. ¡ v~~~<cd~~rR-7-~ ~ R-3 '\\F
T U . ~~~ _ FI' r : /
~-- ~" ~~.~- ~- I-I ! (
........}¡f¡jt~ r., y~.:';f II tJ! '. I-I ì~',: : \
" ~~-:-:J' , , ~' y~ ' -"- /1 <:.. " ," _",,", ,,' \ì , ,
! ! ~ .-, oC).,c J, '. ,_ ,-S~ . I '.
10...,"" -, ,. -z -.', , """" I ,
\ ~
, ,
, ,
_ ,~ ð¡C-1 -, _~~, _, ""~ \
Ii, : I '~, - J~ ~ ~-ñ\~ - '~?.-t4 F.P. i'\ :
-I I ' ~~,.' -' "" rTTT";~ ...,..." - - . --¡ f~t:!J\. ~\.. 'y" ~...p. to- , .!) ,', I 1 I
'\-" ' ~"-h==i"!~ I"~~.,;-,,;, , ~ ('; /;ov/, 1 ,
: Jl ¡:::(\ , 'r: o=-~o/~ _:'i~ c- \Ij' PO · PO f~ -'-'; --=-. ..è'- _. : .." I ~ I \
-~ .,~~~;) " -, "-'---. +';~':""'I i
~\II~;-- ~- 11 C-' t:fr -:-", I ,; ~~.~ ~--, ,.. 'I.'" ~ . .,,~~ J ~~
~'I\""" t:::::::i2~~r'~ -M~ "- CC;:'.':,: ,\' ~"--;:--'i.-'-' ;¡: ~I ?;?'___~ ,¡II
. C-"~ -,~ n , ' , =-11 , , ,.......,.. ... , r-----
' ... '\ ,,\,,,;/) v -" 5 U . """'"' ~j.", . ~ ~ - ,'<: t~ /., R-7 _ MF
':(' , ~'1\, - ~A~""'- - ~ '--i-lf"¡S r-:: 1~ : " è..B' ,.""" .~ ~=--_ 0 I " ,
t?~'A< ,';:/ .' ,/ - c_.~ " C.__ ., . _ -,~ ,~ I, :
"~I'./.~ R-7-MF ,--H·',: '<)-,-~.,: ~ R-3 .. '. ,
' , -':.' /'r1 r' - 'T - . _ -"" C:- ,;.... ..,d:: ", "" F.P. ., I
~\ .' 1 r~ I i--¡...=:!!!!:::n: t"'"I:T ~ __ _ ~ _... ...... .
T-:.y~~'~ ,-' -- ~' ~ '-,'Fl' "- ,- ,_ ... - ~tc." __ " . _.....:...._, \ \
AF,.........- f<: ~ -.. '.' _1 ~ .o.,e. .... ..............~ '... \ \
L--<'~. . _~~_, "
-~- L./ ,...... , - ""..:- ~\ ;:>rffi - L.. , ! 1 I 11',:; A /( , I, / \
- >'" ~ '" , ,,<=-' , " /"
'ô : - . "(.' 1--:: ¡"- '" pro¡;: .,.J"\"~;=g '- j \ \ / \. "
. . . t: ~ - - >--~F¡::: ~a' ~.--+-I- ( MF \ / ,
...., , .... -' '." ~ -- ¡¡ r- ---' '-' ~~>--i~ . R-7-. ...'"..... .' '.
-'. . " /' '. ," ". "'. ,
. . 0 . ,. '. , . .- , . . ~ ...._ . I' " .. C _ .'
. , ~.,. ,~ ..~ -- '. , ,
. . "0 Ie-- -, .... R-S-T ,_ '- ~ ~ " _ " _::_'
H ~ t...:...J t::!::. _ a- I '1j!;.Q' , I I ,
",-'I ~ .. , :-To""'" ;'-- ~ :r.,..TIÍ . .,," C _, , i_" . _, ,.,
~~' .., Tt~:·'"C'2,;...o-j:""""_L::f_.. I ~. \ ~1
. -~ - . ~o"..' 'S U"---I .., ;', rj .... _ I
.,- ~'/ " -'';'' .¡.G.TS :.'.... "("-? :ir_ t:::"-7:-r-': , "':"1 .¡q-f:- c- - . 5-O'.:Tf -PD
.:\'¡::S, ..<)."";, ",. f.,,,,, , if.... " " ". R . D v' f./ ,
j=I ;-----~. :J 1 '. .. " . ! , ,'= p , .., "_ :~,._." t '\R 5- c- 1-/ I / l. . i
,-,.,. .. . Ii t. . , . I 1 I· r--1., - , , f.".....-? . f- _. __ " 'f 0 . I
.¡ , .. , ' . .' . '-' -." ~ .,... . ~ ". f',
_! ~'ch·~4 -: l~: . i ....- Wj-r""' L' ' " .-: -- -~- . -':.j =1 h'šu,.¡' ~ Ä_ ,. µ ,l
~. ~ ~ ~ rc-- .... tJ~ \Œ~ ~ -ú , 11, J I ~-~ ~_>-j-.., "":::5~ ~,
71- , \ :..J:::: ' .~ ~ r r ' I. lfM..m...) ~ V ~ /' _ . _') , '10
~ j H,~ J;.J ~- ~ ~ :- L' ' '. j · C" r-r.'~-" f' :'c71 _!.I c,.pL\~, ,~ . , \
~~~ElQ~~· I,\-~-' ~ r . I[~L.~~C '~k-'l: -~= - R;,!-':'7. 'I
'"'. ro."v_~i =:::; ê'..J '----j ~,- >- U II ~~~~-' 'I- E-- ~ ~.. I_~ i .' C
'~": I· \\,\\ £ ~~ ~:......¡~~ -~ ~ -~ :- ~ ,A ~ T, '~c' .,/', ~ .:: f-.;:J ~,c._ /,:; R-¡ : ¡ . ,
:. " '\ \ R.;?;Yj l- ~ "-. " R-7-M. F ~. ~ :....~¡..~. "iJZ."--__ u / " ._ ~ I-._~s-J.
. , .. - , ~ = ..,", / / -- " - .. "
~ í 1~ t:: ~ -= : 1 PO " " 'I -1 '- '-'-~" '<;liI'1J I " _ :
~\\\ ! ~::::¡ .' 1" L: C 2 C-IS~\o. ~C-J, ~~~~:'3:rr1 ~h- f-.. - f---- -C-'J ! i;:':';1- - ~Vf
\ Ic 2 - ~ S ?: I: 0«:~~' {~~-;. (..ffE=:-,c~ ...,:.:. ~",~:c...,...~ '" r~-;:;'
~:) 1;87 - -.,. ~- ....h:.R s u t: . ',:: S~ÜI...~"\. '. . -<""~~.Fr.:--'-1I1" r- rP'A,~.;¡~ I ,4 .'
~ ~' f· c~_ '-i C,o' 0"" I c-'~r f. . _ I g
'-- f- ,~.. s .',. ~ . _
-~ " ~~~/r' ..e. '"v.' Š~- ;..~." 12'1T ~õ'~-I:~'" ~ ::~(II 1'2.J/~" C'2 ~~. -/.>~ ~' --C-I';~U
I, ..1"< ~ "0-, , ,.. '.,~. . . 'C'IS U..
:-::TI N R I ~ s.u ~--=-=-..,.. Io.j ~~
-" - , , --N'" 0 .....C-,
' - '... I!'R .,' S U . /
~f-- " '''''b 5U' ". '" SU
:-=1:[.= "-~ v~ 'F.J"." -:--- . ....
-~ -1~ ,: :#~ ,~', l ; r+~' i (if ..~. -.......... I;,,^
. . ...; ¡,( "" ",.' -.........' 'Ioi I. ;'C/'. i I
---~. ,.."- ~. .,~, '<.,. \ ~ '. ~ C-2 If·c....'u: C- 2 I:
.. ~, .. >, \, , 'I I'
", . '- " \,.\ I 'I . /
-. ,j~ f C-2),. ''--~ .\ , ~,... J /
-1',- - .,-, ---= .. , , ~..... ; r \
. . ...,Jr-~"'i'+'" -\", , .! ~ ".... 1..Þt PD .'
--{·~k/ ,\ / . ~,~ ~~,. ("_I , __". . .._.
01. - '/, \
.
,
,C
"
i~I~.~__
;?-
I..J '
L.,.~
ì't" f-
-
/
:
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
November 14, 1985
(
"--
Chairman Bowen stated they would move
item #22 to item #3a at this time.
3a. PS 85-85
Request of Century Building
Construction Company for replat of
Lots lR, 27-110, Block 4, Northridge
Addition.
PS 85-85
APPROVED
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 85-85. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
Chairman Bowen stated the Commission
approved in September new procedures.
Each side will get to present his case
and then each person will have two
minutes to speak. He said this is
the interest of time since ther
lot of people wishing to spe
4.
PZ 85-121
Request of Ron McFarlan with Hansom
Hanks to rezone a po on of Lot 20,
Block 4, Diamond ch Addition, from
its present cl ification of LR
(Local Retai to LR-Specific Use-Sale
of Beer f off premise consumption.
This p perty is located at the
sou est corner of Glenview Drive and
D Drive.
,,--.
Chairman Bowen opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. McFarland came forward. He said
this is a typical convenience store
and wish to sell beer.
/
Chairman Bowen stated that before
going to the City Council, Mr.
McFarland would need to submit a name
for the Specific Use. He said the
Specific Use is granted in an
individual's name, not a company.
Mr. McFarland said that would be fine.
L
.~ ~....,;. . ".o::-';-,":r-."' '- >. ~
~:t-'.."I~<.'~ ~,..._:~~':'4:..::~,.- ~"'''''"'''; ..,;.~~.;. ~;. '~<"~
.~~:.;. ~~::~ ~:"~f . _,,~~
I: I I ;, ,
I I '...~ . i ~ t
(.
J
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
\----
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
November 7, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-843, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
NORTHRIDGE ADDITION,
LOT 1R, 27-110, BLOCK 4,
REPLAT,
PS 85 - 85, GRID MAP 115
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 Please see our letter dated September 10, 1985, PS 85-65, regarding
prorata for water and sanitary sewer.
2 City inspection personnel should carefully monitor the site filling and
grading operations associated with this development to assure that
drainage will be directed to the northwest corner of the site at Bob Drive
'- as shown on the site grading plan. The existing flow is to the northeast
corner of the site.
3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
RIC~(f· ~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City f.1anager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Uorks
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
"--
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367
~."',~..;.",..'
·l .
~
,....,<',:..... :'·-'-",7'·>' .:·~.,,¡:;v¡1·;'.4f":~-..~·.~_.. ;,.......-."..., ._J...·....w:................'aIo'...:~ __......
\
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ì.-
Planning and Development
Department:
11/25/85
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PS 85- 86
Subject:
Request of Arnold V. Pent, III for Final Plat
of Lot 2, Block 7, Richfield Addition
-
This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 2, Block 7, Richfield
Addition. The property is located on the northeast corner of Chapman Road and Rufe Snow
Drive. The purpose for the proposed plat is to create a commercial lot for development.
The applicant's stated intent is to construct a Mobil Self-Service Station at this
location.
The Thoroughfare Plan designates Rufe Snow Drive as a six lane divided Principal arterial
street requiring a right of way of 110 feet. Chapman Drive is designated as a four lane
Collector Street requiring 68 feet of right of way. The plat included the necessary
dedication of right on both streets to accomplish the widening of the streets.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Final Plat of Lot 2, Block 7, Richfield
Addition as submitted in Plat Application PS 85-86.
\,-/
,
\....-
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
.......
¡et¿/lµ
City Manager
. Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of 1
eõ>'~- .'.
H~~.:':'~F-::~~ (,;,! c, ,.,.,..;:-/' / ~ .
.':'~: ~~w ..-:i__._' . ~-.....~--~r-.~'
,.~'~=---~ .... ~..- '
-' -,.c. =.---< ,--,;:_ -B' ~ '-C'- - " , rrr' '~-- , .
. . >_---. ~~~-.'" '-cj",c;~""'T0 ¿~~_1
./? ,.__.- ~.~_'_' _ ~~1T~ ,,~
';,.= ~ =;' c C=-...iJ.J.CI/"~"" , ....,... '7-,L1' .' ' . · '
. 1"- :-:::.---::== :'~~l ..,; c-"'."~.,,,,~., ~~ .~ _.-c I;~"·l"', -
'1;, .". .-:-..¡f----.-.-~~~ ':"".' ,~ I '. .¡ _,.~~..,-r~ ì\\\\ :,-r-__-_,I;.Jl(j,~Î-~
_~> .... . ',". ,=": C --1,=,~ >;'~;: .:.c~ r--"'--- _ , ,,;-"~.~' ': ,; ~>'~- ~ D .~. {-........./.~
. . " ...-.-- ~!¡;_J" f-':"! '\1' ..~.,' ,~I,. ,"""'~ . · '. ".c..;r
='~ ',.LC.-, :::J:=".---,,:~j ¡."n+' " i I.~ ~, ,~~' ,'. ~....-c-c, ,~;::L.J ,.. l' . , .,
_ H '=C .1 . ~, ~ :?c.='<-----'¡=: '.,..,,~' ,-'-' .WlL..-"::: · , .' , ' .' ," ' d .--;¡ ::=: ~-'-' "..,..-"" ,C
_,.'-----~>_i.~-~--~. .!rLi~ æ-='. -- ~\ ' .Y'.,¡........'-''..~..;.r-----.''. ..
__,_ '"" < ~~/ ,,__~_' ,.... " , ,'" ' .' ,..o.,.-,=L' .. ~ A'-' , ,
_. _. ..,...->' . /" _. . __ '- .,; ,... . .'; _ t¡"~' . ~~ ,\. ' :'. . . "","-)' ..x: ~ ....,
~, .:,=~:'::-:"=_ \;. ;;,_.::;:.p:~'ru,¡;""'~ ~ L~ .: .' '. .r2--r~'0·;,,<.k~
_ ~-"" -: AC~ . '" -- =-,-,-,-' ..11" Lf .--rrr-n-. ,.. .' ,~~"'<;" }/% /.../ --
__. \ -.-7 --'C'c,,~ '0 c S' t-- ., ': J "Tt'"'iT'- ' , I" P "..J-~, '£;---11·2 ,<, .-<.....'::
-:c'~ "-r :::. ---,="" )--> ¡_....~., ¡, . .-' j"., ' . : ,J~' . '. \~--.'J.' .' -c--,.. .\J400() ';:~" ".'\....-
, " __ " " " .~' . .. ,~~,";J'''' L'.! ~~~"L""'Xc" ,. ~
.L...; ._ . . ."~:nt=. ~. ~ll'~~' ~
;............. _______. ^ .~ __ ~.' , ' 'I '. \. \ '. ...' . ,.--,_I'.'~~ ,.,,~
.~~. ~_II;.. ,:""- _-L.-'_"_~~' ~~' .,"" . . ~ -,M' I.
. H-- Y.---"-~ ~"" ,- ~ u ' q---- .' .....1-· r --'-' L "..~,~~
~ ---.. .y , --'. ' i>~~. '\¡.~ ;:Jit>r. ~. :.' ~ ; _~o:c.----=",. ~ -: - . ;·,n.....
,.,. '.' .,: ' ; ; I ê=H=t::~ :/~.....;¢::.:-~c,> -:~:'3tt:::""'§:: bA-d.~~· . 'i ~ " "",i- '1~ jc::1
.. ~ .."" /....,,-- '..--y~ ..-=5= 3,'-" " , -, ~ ~",. ~~
. . . I . ~P'+- ..., ~~."'':l =_ .. -,-,-..,' ~ , C-------- .' ;. ,
.,.. ~ .I>--'.ili ;-t--==i--","-::.::~",,~t= ::J ~ -: , . ""'T~
(.". ,;', µ:::=~,..'c::.;-' ....: ~;C"( ":">=J::J ~-- R' 7- M' .....' .',.
~ .__~ _, - ~ ,.... ......~.. - ~'~. .' . . -.'.'~ ~ ; 'of" .-:--¡.,"
,I ~. ...' ..r""~ -:
. .. C; I' i ~ -, r------:."~:-.. ,+;~
ç;:;;: :..¡..;¡o;.., _ C ' I ;--<~,t±f
~r---'~T",--=2:':,: "'~"l' ~l' .,' t ',,',~~, '~, " _ .--- .:1 I 8~,.· /. ~i Ii:·'!
; :c"'~".c: .;;;,,, ."".... .. " - 1 '4l : ~ ' -'.L!.J
-=-=:;:~..,' r ~I~:;,:~~~ls I
>- ~,' \ .. . .a--i
_ _ 'i' --,-,,; ~\C.. ~ '1=1 "
,""" c___ ,.. , ' c '" ·--e.F ... < -: R
-'" -- -- ,;, .~~
= J::t~.:1t._. _ __ ;;:: , "','C ""ó~"'" .1
'.....::-, ...":J}";;" "" ~;-' co
o ,..... " .'.. ~k,,,.=
~,~.~_-.J.tr--
Q....-' v--"- . - - ~"'--
y-) ~.-,-"!-'---::'Y ::-:~
.v-<.:>.·~~ . ~
~. .<,...q,.,:----r-.....:.-'-'"
;t.::::> .,".R~ .~ :~L
-=...- ~>~¿:~~.£;;;: ;-=
. ' . ...... '/ :".. ;"
-~ . ~, . ~ '" .'.&..- ~ .
_^ ~--: ,,' ,....,., ..... = . ./ . .,·r>Jr~-8'
~_"_ ,~-=::bf-H, _ .3:?',;~~"F..'"
-,..o~ -=:::; ~ _ gjj , ~ I ~ ~c.. ~ ~. ,J"
.~_ ~~;,~~-_<:~.CL, ~~ I _-' ¡ ~ ~.- '~@ LR
""",.' "~~ ...,.., ~~ -'/. ~. Su
-' ,'. (><' .~~I ~ -' " \
~ ~ / ....... __~.... -'"'+--"I - I
.. . _ ,'."/ '-:' w~ . " ' ,. .
" ,'.c '..,¡::::- ';::: _ ,..;........ .....; . ,'- '
"- " . ,(;!'....;;, ...,.- " - . "". ,., ) -'-..
. . ¡f"'C:L--'""""'" ~~'1.: ~. Q-f-':::v,
__ ~~ ...::::- ;;.>: ::E ~; 4'<:; .<"~ ~
..~ . '_.' ,_ r- '-'- ,',( ~...... ,.)~' 'l"" . /'\
. . . ""-'-'" p. ~" ""': ./ . ^" '.-.' '-"
_ .',A.. .lor"'1 f ... .'" '. ./ -x;oc.' ~,:">/ 'J... I'
" -4 . 'I ~... ~_..... ... .^ ~'
" - ._. __~ - " ...:x: ~ .,
" ....' --' ::.;- ~ ,Y.'· ,
i.. .--. -. :'t~" .-' . ¡,- -::' '.,,,-,-)¡:y
--f .~ -' )'/'1' .
.'"". _ ~ :::-' :i<.~;~ c; 'ij
,,, -<;':wØ"" :::: " \. \ ,,' ,
"""'.' ~_ ..,,_' ": ' / --""..s.....L....,øç.L
" -'::.' ~ ~;oo=:= ~\¥"~' ~~., . ~~l
:-.- "- .. :: :.~ ,i~""'« ...;;= ,/
::'--~4~ ~ ~/;7'C\ I -.:-.: _.::~=
_ ~.~', =-:-:- _ ¿À# >"7:
. :.....~ . --. ::- .. ' ;:(. , <.....L
--, .'.' ~ .... . .'; ----~ /' ---..;/-,...'.,..,......,
,: ,,- 'Ä. Þ:'~'<, ;'/.... -./..'''' .>~'~. .,. y ~---~--,. ~~
~ . . ...)", ^ .r--'--" . ..-'
.~ .' "f,^ " . Á'" ,'" ,.. .. ,-:_<,
~. :~.'." j 6,.",:' /~... '. ~, ,,-,..',' ~ -{( =
.' "," .,""" ")").k . r'
....' . ~~~ _ ___'_ _. ',' . ..' ~o\.--);' . .J ~. -
_" "-. .',.. 7' ""'. = ~ " ----",' ,,~.~=.., ..' . -->: .: '/ .,.'c
. ' , ,'" ~_") "-"" _. ''C?'". = '1f. ...... " . ""'~ _u,
q::::'" '~..:.> . .' . ',"..J~' 'S~ ~ -::: ,\~.-.~. 'y' -:-.~ :'" ,~
'. > ' .' ~. _,_,-;)'- '" "/. .;J---=::/' ~ --.,' .c;<%'
"~"" ,_ _;--:ot '. _ "."" ,m ., ,:' ,'w' '0 ' __,' . ..:;;;; --.., ," C
,. ~ _ ..;C ~ _'.' ~~ f :;;\~,. . ".-':"-' .,¡.-" .. C·- ",-
_ .... . -= ~ .,.ti=-'., \<K" '. : --?-" ,.,. i .---: ~':::
-..~ W:..--..--~ ~I it~,/1. - I--.~-·-·· :
.. _~ ..""~ !!'~ _ . --:::--" ,r., ,=~ '" ' -,", . C
.. -. ...-..... 'Y..""--'> :,;.. ,,~,,' '..," ...---..,.~ ~ ."
....;..j.::;; ..,.~ r ',~ /~ -;-.. /.....-:.- = .:
. --...:-" ,/., - ,....'..--
///~..--__ ...., i!-
--- -~-'
J-.
't. .,
..
.
~..J.
'-:-
'."
~
c-
"-')T-=,=
R-7-MF
AG
-
--'--'~=
"":8µ--
-,"C:"~ -
1-2
· ---
''-.-
PRESENT:
Chairman
Secretary
Members
M1NUTt;::> Vi' fHt; Kt;lrULAK Mt;t;T1Nlr Vi' THt;
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
NOVEMBER 14, 1985 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF OCTOBER 24, 1985
'-.-
1.
PS 85-78
PS 85-82
PS 85-82
APPROVED
The meeting was called to order
Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P.
Alt. Member
Dir. Planni & Dev.
P & z Co ainator
Do Bowen
hn Schwinger
Mark Wood
Marjorie Nash
Joe Hallford
Carole Flippo
Richard Royston
Wanda Calvert
ash made the motion to approve
minutes as written. This motion
as seconded by Mr. Hallford and the
motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Wood and
Mr. Schwinger abstaining since they
were not present at the meeting.
Request of Wright Construction Company
for final plat of Steeple Ridge
Estates.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85078 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Jeff Marsh for final plat
of Block 23, Kingswood Estates.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve ps 85-82. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Hallford and the
motion carried 5-0.
3.
'-
" '...
PS 85-86
PS 85-86
APPROVED
Request of Arnold V. Pent, III for
final plat of Lot 2, Block 7,
Richfield Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-86. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0.
("
VI1
Yandell & Hiller, Inc.
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
(
'-
3100 Texas American Bank Building. 500 Throckmorton Street. Fort Worth, Texas 76102 . (817) 335,3000 I Me!'o 429·1291
November 6, 1985
Planning Department
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, 76118
Attention: Wanda Calvert
RE 3-951, City of North Richlad Hills
Richfield Addition
Final Plat
PS 85-86, Grid Map 76
Ms. Calvert;
We are in receipt of a letter from Mr. Richard W. Albin, P.E., Knowlton-
English-Flowers, Inc. regarding the above referenced plat. This letter is
a response to the comments in Mr. Albin's letter.
'-.'
Items 1-5 and item 7 have been applied to the plat. Item 8 is deemed as
informational only and has been noted and referred to the owner. Item 7
is not being performed by this office. The owner has employed the firm of
Everage, Smith and Farrington to prepare all engineering plans. My contact
with that company is Justin Landes. It is my understanding, based on conver-
sations with Mr. Landes on November 5, 1985, that he will have his plans
revised and submitted to the city by the November 6th deadline.
I trust that this provides the information requested. If you have further
questions, please contact me.
Respectfully,
?~Hlt~1
Mickey D. N~R.P.S.
Survey Coordinator
MN: ak
cc: Sharon Malone
Peggy Krussell
Arnold V. Pent III
ENGINEERS
(
f- -1NERS
()
SURVEYORS
November 5, 1985
EVERAGE,
SMITH,
FARRINGTON
& Associates, Inc,
Mr. Richard Royston
Director of Development
City of North Richland Hills
730 I Northeast Loop 820
P. O. Box 18609
Fort Worth, Texas 76118
~!M»}òj .vU-''''''j......:.;w~~'-'_'~,::i~_ ,~,..~_ ~_ ,;
2630 W. Freeway
Suite 100
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Metro 429-7560
Re: Chapman Drive Sanitary Sewer
ESF A Project No. 850139
Dear Mr. Royston:
This letter will serve as our documented response to comment number six (6) of the
Planning and Zoning Commission's review of November 4, 1985 concerning
Richfield Addition, Lot 2, Block I.
'--
We have replotted the off-site sewer profile to reflect the datum corresponding to
the Chapman Drive plans, as discussed with Richard Albin and as shown on the
plans delivered to you this morning.
If we can answer any further questions, please call.
Sincerely,
EV~AGE.'.SMIn;,FARRINGTON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
L ' '( þ. 'O'(t~dav
Ju in D. Landes
Project Manager
kgf
'-~
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSUL TlNG ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
,~,
August 12, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-951, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WILLIAM MANN SURVEY,
ABST. 1010 PART TR. 3A2,
PRELIMINARY PLAT,
PS 85 - 54, GRID MAP 76
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 We would suggest this subdivision be named ¡'Richfield Addition" and the
lot and block numbers revised accordingly.
2 The property owner should provide preliminary platting plans for the
entire area adjacent to Chapman Drive which he controls.
3 The OWner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of the final plat.
4 A surveyor's seal, certification, and signature should be affixed to the
final plat.
5 In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation
should be noted on the final plat.
6 The distance (1112.94 feet) on the west line of the subdivision is not
correct in the legal description.
7 All proposed curb cut locations are subject to approval from the Public
Works Director.
8 The existing right-of-way width of Rufe Snow is about 80-feet along the
frontage of this property. The Thoroughfare Plan designates Rufe Snow as
a future P6D Thoroughfare -- 6 lane divided, lID-foot right-of-way. A
total of 30 additional feet of right-of-way are required, or 15 feet on
each side. The existing 61-foot BIB street section is not centered in the
existing right-of-way, but is shifted eastward some distance. The
developer's surveyor should determine the exact distance from the east
back-of-curb line to the existing right-of-way to establish the minimum
additional right-of-way dedication necessary to widen the existing 61-foot
BIB section to a 91-foot BIB section. A minimum 10-foot parkway easement
'--.'
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
.,:~...:..:;..,.,,,~ ~'';';':''''''->' .;~~~:..!.. ~....'~'.i:,..di,
~"';';::;;".'- VJ'_.;;;':'JI~~·,':"'·'''..'.t.~~_.'.j'.
~,.__.,~<~..;.;;.., ,,""-~"'-
'--
Subdivisio" Review Let~ continued
f
WILLIAM MANN SURVEY
will be required beyond the future back-of-curb line.
9 We would recommend that the proposed 9-foot wide utility and sidewalk
easement be increased to 10-feet.
10 The Chapman Drive widening project is currently under contract with
APAC-Texas, Inc. and the current plans are to widen Chapman to a 41-foot
BIB width. Additional widening to 49-foot BIB width from Rufe Snow
eastward to the Richfield Addition is proposed. We would request that the
property owner dedicate a 5-foot right-of-way and 10-foot utility and
sidewalk easement strip from Rufe Snow eastward to the Richfield Addition
at this time so that utility poles can be set back and full pavement
widening to 49-foot can be accomplished now to avoid setting poles back
again and avoid having to add another lane later.
11 The 25-foot building setback line on Rufe Snow Drive should be measured
from the dedicated right-of-way line.
12 The fire hydrant coverage with a 300-foot radius requirement for
commercial zoning should be shown.
13 The water service locations and sizes should be shown.
14 Utility easements for water line on the east and north side of
subdivision should be provided.
15 The developer should be required to pay his prorata share of the
existing 16-inch water line in Rufe Snow Drive and the 8-inch line in
Chapman Drive. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one
half of the existing lines for a total length of 1,707.94 feet.
16 The developer should be required to escrow his share of 'the cost of
paving Chapman Drive if he has not already done so.
17 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
if you have any questions.
.~
August 12, 1985
PS 85 - 54
PAGE
2
,",.- .~. ,~- '-.'--
,.~~~~~':Y.,.. ~- .
, -
. ·~'a.,·'
(
Subdivision Review Letter continued
(
WILLIAM MANN SURVEY
''-.._--
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
',-
-:
'-"--
August 12, 1985
PS 85 - 54
PAGE
3
'~""....~¡.. -.'~
, :...-.~-,:_,~__,7,~~,: _~..;:~"'_.. '
..-~~t-_ .~.._~~
,·¡o,d
. .
"
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
"--
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
September 10, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re:
3-9511 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
RICHF ELD ADDITION,
LOT 1, 2 BLOCK 1.
REV. PRELIMINARY PLAT,
PS 85 - 54. GRID MAP 76
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments: '
1 Please see our letter, dated August 12, 1985, PS 84-54, paragraph #3
regarding Owner IS Acknowledgement, #4 surveyor's certification, #5 corner
monumentation, #12 fire hydrant coverage radius, #15 prorata for water
line, #16 escrow for Chapman Road construction.
2 We would suggest the block number be changed to block 7, since lots 1 and
2 block 1, Richfield addition have already been platted.
3 Metes and bounds calls should be made to the new right of way line of
Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Road and a metes and bounds call should be
noted on the new right-of-way line. Also, the right-of-way line should be
drawn with a heavier line weight to distinguish it from the old
right-of-way line.
-
4 The current owner of the property just east of this proposed development
should be noted on the plat.
5 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
"
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
...,-;..."-,.:.....; ..,...,'." , .,.'" ~'-'
,..--;...,. '. '~k-:'·,:.,._Ir'·~;'·:·...._.'
:..:.~ '. '"
-~'_' ;'J'-.<- '<, . :...,...~,-i:..~,...¡,.._. ...'"'.~
"
Subdivision Review Let~ continued
(
t{/. a~
P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
September 10, 1985
,....""""..,'-'''-.....".~..,-,...;,e__~ ._.~~......,_ -'-i
,.~,..4.""^:""
:
PS 85 - 54
;..- ~.
RICHFIELD ADDITION
PAGE
2
....1!1of:.~..,...;.~""'..:.~;-J:., "'_- .....','..... ,.... ;-:......~~..;. .,.,.......ii\i
-.; i>
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
'-
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
November 4, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-951, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
RICHFIELD ADDITION,
LOT 2 BLOCK 1,
FINAL PLAT,
PS 85 - 86, GRID MAP 76
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat.
2 The surveyor's certificate should be signed and sealed.
3 All contiguous platting and/or ownership should be shown on the plat.
4 The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the
Plat.
'-
5 The 25-foot building set-back line should be measured from the new
right-of-way lines of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Drive.
6 The off-site sanitary sewer profile should be replotted based on the
datum corresponding to the Chapman Drive plans, as discussed with the
developer's engineer.
7 Please see our letter dated September 10, 1985, PS 85-54, item 2
regarding changing of block number, and item 3 regarding new right-of-way
shown on the plat.
8 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
.(
(
Subdivision Review Letter continued
RICHFIELD ADDITION
',-
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
RI~~Ç0 ~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Linet City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
'-
'-
November 4, 1985
PS 85 - 86
PAGE
2
(
I
I
~
CITy OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
r
L
Department: Personnel
,·Counctl Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Agenda Number: GN 85-111
i
I
L
For 1915. the. City n ap,roved a continuation of tbê "Updated Service Credit"
, benefit initially. for 1984. The Texas Municipal Retiraaent Sýstem Act
requires that the S.mrice Credit" benefit must beac:topted 8J)nually for
this benefit to ,cob year. to year. The attached ordinance satisfies that
requirement. Continuåti9n øf thé tlUpdated$ervice Crèdit" , benefit each year insures
that an employees' retirement, benefit will"" ,up to date·' and more respOnsive to the
effects of inflation.,' This is. accÒlllplishè4by, the -.ploYéea' monthly benefit being
calculated as though, the _pm,... bad always earned a salary:e.qual' to his/her average
salary for the (3) years preceding retirement.
i
í
L
i
L
L
""
I
i
L
Recommendation:
L
i
L
d
L
L.
,
I
L
L
L
'-
L
Source of Funds:
$ónd&(GOIAev.)
Oper~ting Budget
Other
in Account 1160
,
I
I-
. Finance Director
- '-
'--
ORDINANCE NO. 1310
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND ALLOWING, UNDER THE ACT GOVERNING THE
TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, "UPDATED SERVICE CREDITS" IN SAID
SYSTEM FOR SERVICE PERFORMED BY QUALIFYING MEMBERS OF SUCH SYSTEM
WHO PRESENTLY ARE IN THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR SUCH ACTIONS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
Section I. Authorization of Updated Service Credits
<a) On the terms and conditions set out in Sections 63.401 through
63.403 of Title II0B, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, as amended, each
member of the Texas Municipal Retirement System who has current service credit
or prior service credit in said System in force and effect on the lst day of
January, 1984, by reason of service in the employment of the City of North
Richland Hills, and on such date has at least 36 months of credited service
with said system, shall be and is hereby allowed "Updated Service Credit" (as
that term is defined in subsection (d) of Section 63.402 of said title) in an
amount that is 100% of the "base Updated Service Credit" of the member
(calculated as provided in subsection (c) of Section 63.402 of said title).
The Updated Service Credit hereby allowed shall replace any Updated Service
Credit, prior service credit, special prior service credit, or antecedent
service credit previously authorized for part of the same service.
(b) On the terms and conditions set out in Section 63.601 of said
title, any member of the Texas Municipal Retirement System who is eligible for
Updated Service Credits on the basis of service with this City, and who has
unforfeited credit for prior service and/or current service with another
participating municipality or municipalities by reason of previous service,
and was a contributing member on January I, 1983, shall be credited with
Updated Service Credits pursuant to, calculated in accordance with, and
subject to adjustment as set forth in said 63.601.
(c) In accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of Section
63.40l of said title, the deposits required to be made to the Texas Municipal
Retirement System by employees of the several participating departments on
account of current service shall be calculated from and after the date
aforesaid on the full amount of such person's earnings as an employee of the
City.
Page 2
Ordinance No. 1310
'---
Section 2. Effective Date.
Subject to approval by the Board of Trustees of Texas
Municipal Retirement System, the updated service credits granted hereby shall
be and become effective on the lst day of January, 1986.
Passed and approved this the
th day of
, 1985.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
'-
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
'-
.'--1." -..
,
I
I
'-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
L
Department:
Personnel
Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Agenda Number: GN 85-112
I
¡
L
,$ùI)Ject: RèQ;e"l<?f O;dJnanc, Nq. 1282 Adot>tin¡ Section 201íIO
.of! the!air Labor Standards Act. Ordinance No. 1311
G.oDar.sstOnaI action, on November 1, 1985 a,mended the Fair. Labot'Sumdards Act
(FLSA)which remðved the City'sliability to pay any retroactive overtime pay
, forh.ours worltßdpriorto,a new FLSAcompliance date of April 15,1986.
iOt'dinance No. 1282 wàs adopted by the Còun~il on September 23, 1985 which W.ould
,allow the City to us. a specialcompute.t.ion, allowed under Section 207(K) .of
the FLSA, t.o calculate .overtime pay f.ot"firefightingpers.onnel. ,Tbe necessity
f.or Ordinance No. 1282 does n.ot now exist as it didpri~ to the congressional
action. Therefore, the Council is asked to ad.optOrdinaftce N.o. 1311 repealing
Ordinance 1282., An appropri4te.ordinucewill be submitted t.o the C.ouncil pri.or
t.o our new compliance date .of April 15,,).986. '
¡
I
L
¡
L
¡
i
L
,
i
I
L
. -'-';:-"""': '"
It is recommended that the ,City Council adopt Ordihance' Ho.1311 repealing
Ordinance No. 1282.
I
I
L
..
,
~
I
¡
i
L
,
,
'--
L
r
i
L
'-
~
i [
l
I
1C
~
I
"
-
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient FundâAvaUàbie
Source of Funds:
Bonds toO/Rev.)
Operatin08¢Qat
Other'
N/A
. Finance Director
1 "
" , ", " , ,', ..",,'",,",,~,¡ ,",~<''" .,~
;':-'~¿;,~~·fi¡;;';~"¥r;·i,~¡;Y·, - -_~,_~_______ ..">W~
'-
ORDINANCE NO. 1311
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1282
Whereas, Ordinance 1282 was passed on the 23rd day of September, 1985
at a time when it appeared that certain terms of the Fair Labor Standards Act
would require passage of the ordinance prior to October 15, 1985; and
Whereas, the effective date for compliance with said act has been
moved to April 15, 1986 by action of the U.S. Congress on November 1, 1985; and
Whereas, Rules and Regulations affecting cities in this respect have
not yet been promulgated by the U.S. Department of Labor;
Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council that:
1.
Ordinance No. 1282 be, and is hereby, repealed.
Passed and approved this the
day of
. 1985.
- \--
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FROM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
"---
~>
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Public Works
SUbject: Adoption of Ordinance Controlling Letters of, Credit
and Certificates of Deposit - Ordinance No. 1312
Council Meeting Date: 12-29-85
Agenda Number: GN 84-113
At the present time both our Subdivision Ordinance and Water. and Sewer
Policy allow for letters of credit to be posted with the City to cover
the payment to contractors doing work in developers' subdivision.
Neither the Subdivision Ordinance nor the Water and Sewer Policy have
any specifications on the letters of credit. With the economy being
what it is, several banks and savings and loan institutions have closed
recently and it is felt that we should put tighter controls on this
type of financial security as we do have an obligation to the contractor
to pay his bill as it comes due.
In the past we have had to accept letters of credit from banks that we
know nothing about or savings and loan institutions that we know nothing
about and some of these letters of credit have been on banks as far
away as New York. Since savings and loan institutions are more in the
business of long term loans on housing and are really not primarily in
the business for letters of credit, we have eliminated them in this
ordinance.
This ordinance requires that if letters of credit are given to the City
they must beonabank within a fifty mile distance of the City and the
financial condition of that bank will be determined by the staff before
the letter of credit is accepted.
Also in this ordinance we have made provisions to accept certificates of
deposit from banks made out to the City with the interest on the
certificates of deposit being credited back to the developer or person
that gives us the certificate of deposit.
Since a letter of credit requires more paperwork on the part of the City
we have put in this ordinance a l% fee for handling the letter of credit.
In conjunction with this we are looking at the water and sewer policy
and the subdivision ordinance for the purpose of a change to allow
the developers to contract directly with their contractor and eliminate
the City being involved in the contract except that the City would
still inspect the work that is taking place.
Recommendation:
~
The staff recommends to approve the Ordinance regulating letters of credit
and certificates of deposit.
'-....'
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
Operating Budget
Other ~~ ~
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
'--
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
/J
P,J1cl{~'
, City Manager
. Finance Director
'--
1 of
I
ORDINANCE NO.1312
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING LETTERS OF CREDIT AND CERTIFICATES
OF DEPOSIT GIVEN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
WHEREAS, in certain instances the laws of the State and
Ordinances of the City permit persons, firms or corporations to present
letters of credit to the City to secure or guarantee performance; and,
WEEREAS, the processing of letters of credit are an expense
to the City; and,
WHEREAS, certain letters of credit present problems which
are costly and cumbersome for the City to investigate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
Any letter of credit or Certificate of Deposit presented to
the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, must be drawn by or on a bank
chartered by the State of Texas or the United States of America. Such
bank must be located within fifty miles of the City.
2.
Any letter of credit must be accompanied by the latest
"Statement of Condition" issued by the bank in question.
3.
The letter of credit must be accompanied by a cash fee of
l% of the face amount of the letter of credit as a processing fee to
the City.
4.
In lieu of a letter of credit a certificate of deposit in the
name of the City of North Richland Hills will be accepted. Any interest
on the letter of credit will be credited to the person, persons, or firm
depositing same to the City.
5.
The City Manager, or a department head designated by him,
shall make the final determination as to whether or not the letter of
credit or certificate of deposit will be accepted by the City. If any
person is dissatisfied with the decision of the City Manager not to
accept a letter of credit said person may appeal the decision to the
City Council.
',-
PASSED AND APPROVED this
1985.
',~
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL ITY:
ATTORNEY
,~
'--,
day of
MAYOR
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'--
Department:
~ r- Sub 8(:I:
'--
-'v
Public Works
Council Meeting Date: 12-29-85
An Agreement with Lone Star Gas Company for Extension
of Gas Service to the Municipal Complex in the amount
of $14,788.00
Agenda Number: GN 85-114
Lone Star Gas Company has submitted an agreement to put gas service
onto the municipal complex site. The cost for extending service onto
the site is $14,788. The City will receive some credit back from
Lone Star Gas within the first two years after the meters are installed.
That amount would be $150 for each $100 of gas revenue over a period
of 12 monthly bills.
After the first two years and during the third and fourth years, the
City would receive credit of $135 for each $100 of gas revenue over
a period of 12 monthly bills.
We do not anticipate recovering all of the $14,788 but we will recover
part of this amount.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends to approve the agreement with Lone Star Gas Company
and the payment of $14,788 for the extension of gas main onto the
municipal complex site.
Funding Source:
The proposed extension of the gas main to be distributed as follows:
09-60-00-6200
13-90-01-6200
$ 7,394
$ 7,394
$14,788
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating- Budget
Other
'-
See above
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~
~~~ --
Department Head Signature ' ty Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
GO & Rev
~
. Finance Director
"; ;,;.:¡,'''~~''
1
',~,;;¡;:;~w:.~;:- ¡ ~~....,c ,,~;.~
Page 1 of
't""_;:""
',--
K. N. WATKINS
General Superintendent of Distribution
Lone Star Gas Company
FORT WORTH DIVISION OF DISTRIBUTION
100 W. Morninglide Dr. . fori Worth. Teaol 76110
November 18, 1985
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Tx. 76118
Re: Main Extension - ER 85-1208
Rufe Snow Dr. south of Watauga Rd.
I am attaching the original and two copies of Commercial
Cash Deposit Gas Main Contract, covering the cost of gas main required
to serve you. (Indicated on the attached print).
- '-
These contracts and this cost estimate is based upon the construc-
tion site as it appeared at the time the project was bid. Provided
the project is in relatively the same condition as it was at bid time,
there will be no further costs incurred. Provided the scope of the
project has changed, in the opinion of Lone Star Gas Company, there
may be further cost incurred by the Company and passed on to the
customer, prior to construction. Or the Company; at its option,
may cancel these contracts and neither party shall thereafter have
any obligation. (Refer to Section 7 & 8 - Commercial Contract,
Section VI & VII - Residential Contract).
For prompt, efficient response, assure all three contracts are
dated and executed. Please return the original and one copy sent to
you, along with your check.
We appreciate the opportunity of providing you with natural gas
service.
Cordially,
~
~
'-
John Crane
Distribution Representative
Engineering Plans Group
km
Attachment
cc: Mr. J. W. James
ER 85-1208
'--
/'
'\
.FORM 5664 3/78
CASH DEPOSIT GAS MAIN CONTRACT
(Commercial Form)
'-
THIS AGREEMENT, WITNESSETH, that LONE STAR GAS COMPANY (hereinafter called "COMPANY")
and CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
(hereinafter called "APPLICANT") of P.O. BOX 18609, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT 76118
County, Texas, in consideration of these premises and of other valuable consideration hereby acknowledged, do agree as
follows:
(1) That Company will extend its gas mains as follows:
To extend main in Rufe Snow D~. south of Watauga Rd. in the
City of N. Richland Hills, Tarrant County, TX.
a total distance of 1,535 feet (hereinafter referred to as "MAIN EXTENSION"). The route of said
Main Extension is shown as Exhibit "A" hereto attached and hereby made a part hereof.
- '--
(2) Without any right to refund except solely as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4) hereof, Applicant will pay to
Company $ 14, 788.00 in advance (said amount being the net amount for said Main Extension after
allo~ing to Applicant the sum of $ -0- for -0-
bona fide consumer(s) upon said Main Extension).
(3) For each bona fide gas consumer hereafter connected directly to the Main Extension covered hereunder during
the first two (2) years after the date hereof, Company agrees to refund Applicant FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY
AND NO/I00th Dollars ($ 520.00 ) or alternatively in lieu of the above refund for
connection, in the case of each commercial gas consumer having a yearly net gas bill of more than One hundred Dollars
($100.00) connected to the Main Extension covered hereunder within the initial two (2) year term, Company will refund the
sum of One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00) for each full One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) net gas revenue received from such
consumer during the first twelve (12) months only for which gas bills are incurred. If a gas consumer has not been connected
to Company's system within the first two (2) years for a sufficient time to have incurred twelve (12) monthly bills, the yearly
net gas bill for the purpose of computation of the additional refund provided in the preceding sentence of this paragraph,
shall be estimated by Company on the basis of information furnished by the consumer covering consumer's operations, rate
applicable and estimated annual 'gas consumption. In the event that the alternativegascomsumption does not result in a
larger refund than the refund for connection provided above, Applicant shall be entitled to receive the refund for connection
in lieu of the refund based on gas comsumption.
'--
(4) For each bona fide gas consumer connected directly to the Main Extension within the period commencing two
(2) years after the date hereof and terminating four(4) years after the date hereof, Company will refund FOUR HUNDRED
SIXTY EIGHT AND NO/IOOth Dollars ($ 468.00 ) or alternatively in lieu of the above
refund for connection, in the case of each commercial gas consumer having a yearly net gas bill of more than One Hundred
Dollars ($100,00) connected to the Main Extension covered hereunder during the second two (2) years, Company will refund
One Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars ($135.00) for each full One Hundred Dollars ($100,00) net gas revenue received from such
consumer for the first twelve (12) months only for which gas bills are incurred. If a gas consumer has not been connected to
Company's system during the second two (2) years for sufficient time to have incurred twelve (12) monthly bills, the yearly
net gas bill for the purpose of computation of the additional refund provided in the preceding sentence of this paragraph,
shall be estimated by Company on the basis of information furnished by the consumer covering consumer's operations, rate
applicable and estimated annual gas consumption. In the event that the alternative gas consumption computation does not
result in a larger refund than the refund for connection provided above, Applicant shall be entitled to receive the refund for
connection in lieu of the refund based on gas consumption.
.\.-.
... '1:.
OWG, FORM B 200-P
E X ~.~ ~ IT" A '~æT/,l ?dKK EST-S.
:-..
:~ L4NC~SI/IRe
~41 II~ /
W/I¡;4I./C¿f-,wITIIFlE¿¿J
----------~--------
'- A/Tt/RE
--~'
etJ,40
----~---
.e ð.J./.
~
~
...
IV'¡
---
----------
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Administration
Council Meeting Date: 11/25/85
Subject:
Tarrant County Housina Finance Corporation Agenda Number: GN 85-115
1986 Single Family Housing Bond Program, Resolution No. 85-31
In order for the City to continue to participate in the above referenced program, the
City Council needs to adopt the attached resolution.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution No. 85-31
~ \.
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/A
Sufficient Funds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
K'Pi/-~
Department Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
'-'
'l
~.-, '.;';:.t'-":· ,,'., """'..;" ';.. "
1
",~
',--.---
RESOLUTION NO. 85-31
A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE TARRANT COUNTY
HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION FOR THE USE OF ITS SERIES
1986A SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS FOR
ACQUIRING HOME MORTGAGES RELATED TO HOMES WITHIN THE
CITY.
WHEREAS, the creation of the Tarrant County Housing Finance
Corporation (the "Corporation"), pursuant to the Texas Housing Finance
Corporations Act, was approved by resolution of the governing body of
Tarrant County (the "County"), adopted on the 14th day of April, 1980, to
provide a means of financing the cost of residential ownership and
development that will provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing for residents
of the County at prices they can afford; and
\
WHEREAS, the Corporation has the power under the Act to issue its
bonds, the aggregate principal amount of which in any calendar year shall not
exceed the total of (a) the costs of issuance of such bonds, any reserves or
resolutions authorizing the bonds, plus any bond discounts, and (b) the
greater of (i) $20,000,000, (ii) a figure determined by multiplying $100 times
the population of the County as determined by the Corporation's rules and
regulations, resolutions relating to the issuance of bonds, or amount equal to
25 percent of the total dollar amount of the market demand for home
mortgages during such calendar year as determined by the Corporation's rules
or regulations, resolutions relating to the issuance of bonds, or financing
documents relating to such issuance, to defray, in whole or in part, the cost
of purchasing, or funding the marking of home mortgages; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has requested the
approval of the governing body of the City of North Richland Hills (the
"City") to acquire home mortgages related to homes within the City with the
proceeds of a Series 1986A Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond issue (the
"Bonds") .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
Section 1. The governing body of the City hereby grants its approval to
the Corporation for the use of proceeds of the Bonds 'for acquiring home
mortgages related to homes within the City.
Section 2. To indicate the City's desire to participate in this program, a
copy of the resolution will be forwarded to the Tarrant County Planning
Department.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 25th day of November, 1985.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
'-..
(;1 T Y ~~(;l(~TAl( Y
,.'
.:,
AìecrNortheast Bank
NATIONAl ASSOCIATION
7001 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY, P,O. BOX 18000
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76101-1800, 817/284-4711
CHARLES BRINKLEY
Chairman of the Board
October 16, 1985
Mr. Rodger Line, City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
Dear Rodger:
All of the original group have agreed to be re-
appointed to the Industrial Development Committee
except Paschal White. I talked with Robert Harrison,
President of Interfirst Bank, and he is willing to
serve, if appointed, to replace Paschal. I recommend
him whole-heartedly.
Sandy Bartek has agreed to serve the empty spot
on the Committee. You may want to contact her
immediately. I told both Robert and Sandy they would
receive notification from the City Council through
your office.
It is a pleasure to work with you.
Sincerely yours,
éØ(c~
Charles Brinkley
CB:ls
-,~,,~.;.'Yo,t':~~'_';;"~'>''''~?';~
~): ."..),
L ::~)!~,~.. '.~J1!<
':'-+<";'.~"i".j"'·~_:~,:.:,_.."._y.., -:,...,_~-.::;.f:~~w.~<'-;'r...~,....,_40:"- '-~""""""""""""'!;!l~.",,,,_~..¡.,":,;;...r;.,,,~,,,,,,,,,,,~
Date Received:
Received By:
PROFILE FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS
NAME Robert A. Harrison
ADDRESS 4908 Dory Court, North Richland Hills, TX 76118
NUMBER OF
EMPLOYER InterFirst Bank Richland, N.A. YEARS 6
OCCUPATION Banking
PHONE: HOME (817) 485-1550
WIFE'S/HUSBAND'S NAME Charlene
CHILDREN'S NAME AND AGES Robin - 21
OFFICE (817) 485-2650
Tricia - 14
RESIDENT OF THE CITY SINCE 1970
PREVIOUS RESIDENCE 6428 Suncrest Court, North Richland Hills, TX
I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON: (CHECK ONE OR MORE)
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
CABLE TV BOARD
PARKS/RECREATION BOARD
BOARD OF APPEALS
LIBRARY BOARD
"
MÈMBERSHIPS, ORGANIZATIONS AND PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE ON CITY COMMISSION:
COMMENT (ABOUT YOURSELF, SPECIAL AREAS OF INTEREST, WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE,
QUALIFICATIONS AND OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION.)
Prior to becoming President of InterFirst Richland, I was Senior
Vice President, with Northeast National Bank for 14 years.
, .
"-":,,,;~~~~,,,,,,,:,:.
,~.,..,,"..'~' ·:Joþ.~,è.:4;
"::;'.·'~'''f-.:i''~_'~J';'¡:i:~,'''''''''''~~';':~.
PROFILE
~
Date Received: X - 7-,f-I
Received By: ~~~
FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS
.1 it- 2- ~ 2 ß /!-
PHONE: HOME
WIFE' ~SBAN9 NAME
CHILDREN'S NAME AND AGES
~:
, (b ~ ~ ~JA/L( Q' J
RESIDENT OF THE CITY SINCE /
,ÆJ¿ 1~ /1 J?
~~
/1~
NAME
ADDRESS
EMPLOYER
OCCUPATION ~ -
.. 11
PREVIOUS RESIDENCE
DO YOU OWN REAL PROPERTY IN NORTH RICH
NO
ME.MBERSHIPS. ORGANIZATION AND PRE~OUS EXP.ERI CE ON CITY COMMISSION:
~ ~ ~L :Ä-co
COMMENT (ABOUT YOURSELF, SPEC'IAL AREAS OF INTEREST, WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE,
Q~IFICATIONS AND OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATlON.)
~, dk, ~ L '
. ,
. ..
.,
" ,
,.. .,". ~"~~~",.,j-;t:~\",<_,_ ¡:~""~~,~,,.;;;.;,
;~;~i:'~';"';:"·""l~> ~;.Q
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'--
Department: Purchasing ~ Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Bid Award to IBM Corporation for Three
~Subject: Personal Computers in the Amount of $14,748 Agenda Number: PU 85-49
On October 15, 1985 at 10:00 a.m., bids were opened for the above mentioned items and are
outlined below:
VENDOR
EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT
0 $16,098
0 15,393
0 15,160
0 14,748
--
CompuShop
Leas Pak
Maintain System 34
*IBM
-I
I
,-I Recommendation: Approve the purchase of three IBM personal computers from "IBM
I Corporation in the amount of $14,748.
',,-, :
-I
I
I
I
,--I
I
I
The need for word processing, on-line terminals and additional programs City-wide is
becoming more apparent with each day of the implementation of our total automation
efforts. The three personal computers are to be used for implementation of vehicle
maintenance, fixed assets, and inventory control.
--I
f
¡
I
--I
I
i
I
,
I
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
~
¡ Other
¡ "---'
I
!
Acct. Number 01-11-04-6400
S~ficie~s Available
t:h:J~ -
Department Head Signatur ' City Manager
ITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
C;; · .
... · .
~/ f t:;
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I
-, .,
'-:-' t1
\.;. ·
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT ç-, :~
<,
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS r' On
-.... -
~ of the Metroplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
1
,. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: '"
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS
International Business Machines Request For: Personal Computers
201 Main St. Bid Opening Date: November 15, 1985 at 10:00 a.m.
ì Fort Worth, Tx. 76102
Date:
Requisition No.
Sealed bids will be received until lO:OOa.m. November 15, 1985
ì City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 CST
North Richland Hills. Texas 76118
ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041
T1TEM DESCRIPTION . QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
.
I A "TRM" ~ ~ AT no!=: 1 , 1 ? J¡'",,,}. $5,017.50 $10,035.00
640 K Mpmnrv
T 20 M.B. Disk Storage ,
I Color Card Feature ¡,
(',...1,.,,... ('1)'1'
T ( 1) Om> ' T.,-fi-}. p "',... ",1 1 01 p,.-f.....o,...
I Connector
T R "TRM" ... ,1 AT nos 3.1 1 Each $4,713.00 $ 4,713.00
I 640 K Memory
1..1> -M.B. Disk Storage
r-'-.- u, . r.~'T'
I
í
I
-
í
I
r
r
I
r
I
-
r
SUB-TOTAL
ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 14,748.00..)
TERMS % DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH
~ICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 15 DAYS FROM
~ECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
Inr - 'øt. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formal i-
ti,-_, to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
lest interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
,D FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
~ORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS.
IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC-
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR-
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH-
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI.
TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT.
COMPANY: IBM
BY: Jerrv Woodard
PHONE NU~~..: ,7ZtJA2~ ()
SIGNATURá; ~ __1\ L(f. DATE: 11/6/85
¡)'
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER .
",
oJ
GENERAL CONDITIONS
~
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
~ -
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregularit~es of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills ~èserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the fOllowing
specific reasons:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
Proposal containing any irregularities.
Unbalanced value of any items.
\{here the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
.
'-
5. DISQUALIFICATION OF ,BIDDERS
',,-
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is ,interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f~ Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
7. ASSIGNMENT
'- The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8. NOTICE OF DELAYS
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
respect thereto. Such rtotice shall ~ot in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
'-
'--- ..------
',--
(a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
'-
- '-
v
The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills,
on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general
\,
conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be
attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by
(a)
IBM
complies with all the specifications as
outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further
specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills
specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors
(b)
NA
exceptions.
And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of
any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
all proposals, or any part thereof.
JERRY WOODARD
Signed
ACCOUNT MARKETING REPRESENTATIVE
Title
OCTOBER 30, 1985
Date
IBM CORPORATION
Company Name
-
THIS ~ ~ SUBMITTED ~ VENDOR QUOTATION
Vendor Note:
(a) Vendor: Company Name:
IBM CORPORATION
(b) Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" "NO"
I
L
.'
CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
I
L
Department: Purchasina Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Bid Award to Gr.ff Chevrolet for One 1986 3/4 Ton
SUbject: Pièku1? Tru~k in;he Amount of $10.252 Agenda Number: PU 85-50
I
L
I
I
L
On October 15, 1985 at 10:00 a.m.. bids for the above mentionedt.tuck were opened and are
oudined below:
I
I
L
VENDOR EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT
/'
North Loop Dodge ,0 $11 ,812.11
Charlie f:f.illard Ford " 0 11.603.00
James Woods Motors 0 10.749.00
Jack Williams Chevrolet 1 10.252.00
*GraU Chevrolet 1 10,216.00
L
L
,
i
L
L
, ,
The one exception taken by Jack Williams and Graff éhevroletiis not an exception. They
both bid a four-speed transmission. Our specification required three-speed. The four-
speed is a larger. heavy-duty unit.
This truck will be used to add a second sewer crew wit~':rodding equipment.
i
L"--'
I
i
I
I
L
Recommendation: Approve the purchase of 01'1-8 3/4 ton Pickup Tl'\1ck from *Graff Chevrolet
in the amount of $10.216.
I
I
L
I
L
, !
I I
~i
¡ !
¡ ¡
I '
'--'
I
I
¡
I
~
i
I I "-
¡
Finance Review
. Finance Director
~
City Manager
. ,
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
. ,
,.
,-- t6tar of the 'Metroplex
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
Chevrolet Request For: 3/4 Ton Pickup
Graff
1405 E Main Bid Opening Date: November 15, 1985 at 10:00 a.m.
-
Grand Prairie,Tx. 75051 Date:
Requisition No. 10:00 a.m. November 15, 1985
Sealed bids will be received until
- City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 CST
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041
- ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 3/4 Ton Pickun 1 Each 10 ?If\ nn 10 216 00
-' Per Attached Specifications
Make (!. j¡ e. ¡f Yo / ~ 't
, Model Cc- Z<)903 ~~~)
1-
-
-,-
I
I
<
I
I -- ----.,,--- .------ f---,,-, ....-.._.___
I
I SUB-TOT AL 10.216.00
"- ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 10,216.0(1¡
TERMS e % "J.c) DAYS, F q.~. CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN '10 DAYS FROM
RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
- i,," Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
I:ÌèS1 interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS.
IN SUBMITTING THI:s BID. VENDOR AGREES THAT AC-
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR-
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH.
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI-
TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT.
COMPANY: Graff Chevrolet
BY: Bob Noonan
PHONE NUMBER/r-Í.R' ~-2281
SIGNATURE: ~_ DATE: /Ow¿"_I'~-
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER
GENERAL CONDITIONS
VEHICLE BID
1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive
to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland
Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production
model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the
units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature
as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name
plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every
description that is usual for standard stock models of this series.
2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type
of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these
specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item
number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of North Richland
Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications
and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive.
Vendor Initial ')3 J1
---
3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all
equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units
made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel.
4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed
literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the
vehicles he proposes to furnish.
5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin
and Parts Manual with delivery· of e~ch unit.
6. For bids
Richland
than one
7. Warranty
on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North
Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more
bidder if, it deems such action to be in its best interest.
for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid.
~',.;,
This specification is intended to describe a 3/4 ton pick-up truck with
minimum acceptable equipment and features listed below. Vehicles offered
for purchase must be new and of the latest available design and
manufacture equal to the Chevrolet C20HD or Dodge 250.
"-
1. Gross Vehicle Weight Rating: 7,000 lbs. minimum
2. Wheelbase: 130 to 140 Inches Long, Wide Bed Style
Fleet Side
3. Engine: Minimum 300 C.I.D. V-8 Equipped to Operate
on Unleaded Gasoline ~~~1
"
4. Transmission: Three (3) Speed Automatic/With Cooler
5. Rear Axle: Standard Gear Ratio
6. Tires: Three (3) LT215/85R Load Range "D"
(front and spare)
7. Tires: Two (2) LT215/85R Mud Grip, Rear
8. Brakes: Power Assisted With Front Disc
-",,"-,
9. Steering: Power Assisted
10. Extra Heavy Duty Engine Cooling System
11. Alternator: 60 Amp
12. Cab Heater and Defrost System
-
13. Heavy Duty Rear Step Bumper 4" Painted With
1 7/8" & 2" Ball
14. Paint Color: Silver Metallic, Dupont 1603
15. Left and Right Mounted 5" or 6" Spotlight
16. Knitted or Smooth Vinyl Trim Interior
17. Amp, Temperature and Oil Gauges
18. Heavy Duty Battery, 60 Amp
19. Side Mount Below Eye Level Mirrors
20. Front Bumper Guards
YES NO
J
j
j
.; i/~
J I
J
./
v
!
V
V
,/
,J
../
vi
j
I
V
~
¡
,/
~aw~
Yes No
!
.¡
j
j
/
4t1
21. Fold Down Seat
22. Factory Installed Air Conditioning
23. Vehicle Shall Be Undercoated
24. Vendor Shall Supply One Each Maintenance Manual With
Vehicle At Time of Delivery
25. Total Number of nays From Date of Order to Delivery
Warranty Offered IZ/Mù j¡z-C/tJ'tJ /v11/~":' GII a fÒy/v~7Ÿ;¡ ¡ÿ ¿i
. , - rf
t.,.,fMd /2t/(r¡)(5 MJ~# ðJ~/V¿"-r;t'>fin {A./~YYè,;J-f"'¡ (tD7:J D~ J)
- '-
-
'~-
"-
-''---
, .
The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills,
on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general
conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be
attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by
(a) r,r~ff Chevrolet
complies with all the specifications as
outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further
specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills
specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors
(b)
/ ( one)
exceptions.
And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of
any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
all proposals, or any part thereof.
-&~
Signed
Fleet/Med Duty Mgr.
Title
:
October 29,l985
Date
Graff Chevrolet
,....~..:'_.,._..._-_..
".----
Company Name
~ MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION
Vendor Note:
(a) Vendor: Company Name
(b) Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" /
I.,..
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
. . D~partment:
Purchasing
~idAward toTexa$P'ire/Rescue System for One
"-1a~!if.Qf".Lifell ,R~~cueTool in. tbe Amount of $6..220
Council Meeting Date:
11-25-85
, 3ubject:
L
h
Agenda Number:
PU 85-51
On October' 15, 1985 at 10:00 a.m.. bids for the above mentioned rescue tool were opened
and are outlined below:
'--
VENDOR
EXCEPTIONS
AMOUNT
'--
Koetter Fire Protection
No Bid
Riggs First Line Equiptnent
o
$8,208.27
*Texas Fire /Res cue. System
2
6,220.00
The two exceptiQllsitakell by Têxas Fire /Rescue,System concerntbe/øperating . pressures. We
ask for 10,500 P$Ioperating pressure., Texas ·.Fire/Rescuebid'.,Æ1i..'unit .tbat operates on
5,OOO.PS¡.'J¡'þ.~lower PSlul1!t:doesbave a'i:)etter safety factor- 4:1 -because they use
20.000 PSI hose. With~be spec'ified, unit operating at 10,500 PSI pressure using 20,000
PSI hose, your safety factor is 9:1. The lower, pressure unit st:i.ll produces 14,500 pounds
of forcejwe only require 10.300 p()µ.n,ds of force.
1, Chief G~rtz and I both feel the low bidder has an absolnt. """""table nnit.
~ ~~::¡::::~:i~;~te:P&~()::et:~:rc:~S~6:~2~n:n:J:::eo;e~~::ue~::::~o:~Ol from *Texas
I
.1
'1
,J
,if"
~
I
ì
I
~
I
t
i
""
"'-,
I'
,
I
..,
Sourde of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~
9perat ,Budget
cnn. í£
Department Head Sign
Finance Review
Acct. Number 01-90-02-6400
~ffI~ndß Avallabl.
'"1f1z~~
;: 'fA ·
, /, City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
;
l...,-
I
''''iI(fi'ifl~~_ø¡,~j~¡'j~~~"~~~.,,,,,,.~~;,~,'i.::; ".
;'~~:':~f~#ð:~;~,~;;í,;~
. '''/
, '". ,'. ' " . ~ " '. , 1
.." u,. " .~;""~~J,,,~;;.;~i1\¡it.i:~í~~~<\''i:>i~Ù~.~~~,,~"~"!,.., "',<" "'#~"¡¡b\id
r
-C{\
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
~tar of the 'Metroplex
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
j" "'
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
~. Request For: Rescue Tool
1 Bid Opening Date: November 15, 1985 at 10:00 a.m.
Date:
Requisition No.
TEXAS FIRE/RESCUE SYSTEMS Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. November 15, 1985
1 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 CST
P.o. BOX 570 (512) 625-4972 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
I ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041
- NEW BRAUNFELS. TX 78131 TOLL FREE 1·800·292-1333
ì'TEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE .iJ. TOTAL
I 1 Rescue Tool 1 Each ~ '/22Ð-~ -In . ')., ,,!!p
T "Per Art.<lched ~necifications
I
Make U A-I ¡:. ,\ - nC L{C::E:.. II
Model _-f"J - '1..:7 ---L
r (') -- I 'Q) I'~ --
,-'fL _i''''- t:I.~ 'TV' ..",n 111\1,..,-
T ¿¡II . '" II .. :-7,. ~{.I ~~ P-Tr'. lk<;'
r i' Al-lItcl ~fl.. r
-
.~ -
1
r
1
I
.
T .<
I
1
I
T
I
-
I 11
r SUB-TOTAL ' (n. 7.7. I') '=-
ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ~ ¡" ') '".)..t"') c¡g... ~
.
1
TERMS 0 %.3 0 DAYS. F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN DAYS FROM
_ RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
ir- ')ept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
t Jr to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
beSt: interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS.
IN SUBMITTING THI:S BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC-
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR-
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH-
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI-
TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT.
COMPANY: Te>tAì fl¡t¿ç (Rt.stvf:.. 5yST?A/\S
BY: B~ 41U YCIV.J
PHONE NUMB~:u;.
SIGNATURE, DATE: 11./3·8f
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER
_,.v.,..._...,...
'ì
-.'
GENERAL CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agree~ to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
I. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregula~ities of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservatio~.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced value of any items.
(d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
..... .~;' "4-:--_
-.
5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
',-
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered9
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier9 is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
7. ASSIGNMENT
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8. NOTICE OF DELAYS
-
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent9 stating all relevant information with
respect theretC)., Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however9 may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9.
BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
~
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
-
...........
'-
~
~~
(a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
-
RESCUE TOOL BID SPECIFICATIONS
1. SPREADER
'-
A. Rescue tool to be of a spreader type design, with a minimum working
pressure ,of not less than 10,500 P.S.I.
B. Toöl must have a minimum opening spread of not less than 27 inches.
C. Minimum weight of the tool 57 pounds.
D. Tool to be of hydraulic drive, powered by a gasoline driven motor.
E. For safety reasons, non-return valves must hold the load in case of
pump failure.
F. Arms and tips must have barbed teeth at the inner side in order to be
able to squeeze pipe, etc.
G. Chains shall be provided with hooks and one extra shortening hook must
be available to be able to make a fixed loop.
H. Tool must be well balanced with the capability of a one-man operation.
2. RESCUE SHEAR (ÇUTTING DEVICE)
A. Rescue shear must have a minimum working pressure of 10,500P.S.I.
B.
C.
Tool must offer a minimum of 17 tons of pure cutting force.
Minimum weight of tool to be 31 lbs.
Minimum blade opening to be four (4 ) inches measured at the points.
D.
E. Must use regrindable blades with a recess in order to cut solid steel
bars of ~ inch.
F. Tool must be well balanced with the capability of a one-man operation.
3. GASOLINE DRIVEN PUMP
A. Must use a 4-stroke well known engine o~ at least 3.5 horsepower, pre-
ferably a "Briggs & Straton" or equivalent.
B. Engine must have a "one óandle" control for all functions as throttle,
choke, etc.
C. Weight n·)t to exceed 66 lbs., including valve, oil, carrying frame, etc.
D. Pump,must havè a minimum hydraulic oil capacity of 1 gallon.
E. Pump must be available with a "one tool'~ connecting valve or at choice
a "two tool" change-over valve to be able to connect the hoses of two
tools and select the one to operate.
F. Must have a pressure-release valve to release pressure which has been
accidentally built-up, when the pump has been started without connected
hoses.
Attachments - couplings, etc.
A. 20 ft. twinned hoses with connections
B. Couplers should be of the "quick-coupler" type and should have dust caps.
C. Quick couplers with lock-rings should also be available.
SUPPLIER
A. All equipment is to be able to be repaired by "kit"form".
B. Bid specifications must match all printed literature of equipment
and be able to be su~stantiated upon request.
C. Complete owners manual and instruction book to be included.
Warranty
Gasoline Engine
Parts
r2t¡~
~'1~
Service
~ MO.
~MC~
Rescue Tool
Parts
Service
Location warranty work shall be performed #, O(.J~ tJ.,c¡:::/CL t!:?Æ- /¡J
ÓlSE ö;C· ~~~cy ¿,.,¡e,
M ¿L ¿04-AJ 6 rr /9- /UJL 7l:J
VSE. c~ WE AH/I Cð""" é
PI K /9-r ý'0c.Jæ.. z:er'T
:
.,'!'~"'o,!'--- _'..'><
The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills,
on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general
conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be
attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by
<a) 1éx4S hI!¥.. I f(t:S(!.v£ complies with all the specifications as
, .
outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further
specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills
specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors
(b)
Fovl(
exceptions.
And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of
any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
all proposals, or any part thereof.
.
{al- IV
HES/OEN/
Title
-
11·/3 ·Sf
Date
TEXAS FIRE RESCUE SYSTEMS
-_!!!II!!_..¡- - .._
Company Name
THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION
--- -
Vendor Note:
<a) Vendor: Company Name
(b) Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO"
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLANDHILLS --
Purchasin2Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Bid Award to PadgittsCommunication SpecialiSt for One
Character Gjanerato1'." in the Amount of $5.741 . Agenda Number: PU 85-52
at: 10:00a.rÀ..bids for the above mentionèd equipment were opened and
AMOUNT
$7,765
6,595
6,550
6,039
i
L
5,741
I
I
L
':, "'- '" -'-'- /. ,,~- .
The^1'resent ¿haracter generator produces messages using one stock lettering, a choice of four
basic background colors, and at6 page sequence. The Chyron VPII character generator would
enhance the City's Bulletin Boa~d message displays.
r l ~ecommendation:Approvebidaward to *Padgitts Communications Specialist for one VPII in
L "'-'the amount of $5,741.
I
I
I
I
L
W..
! I
J
I
,l
/
i
~
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
L, Operattn{J 8u at
.'!L,Other.
-
Finance Review
~cct. Number 01':'50...05-6500
S.ffl.~~labI. _.--
Rf17~
. . City Manager
. Finance Dlrectot'
of 1
""" I 'I -·lvt~hfÞ!ufill:i'..,
"
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
\f
-......
'tar of the 'Metroplex
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
r ~
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
.. ,.,~~
PADGITTS Request For: Character Generator
COMMUNICATION Bid Opening Date:
SPECIALISTS November 15, 1985 at 10:00 a.m.
6210 fJ. BEL TUNE RD, Date:
SUITE 155 Requisition No.
IRVING. TEXAS 75063 Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 a .m. November 15. 1985
214-255-8618 SINCE 1867 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 CST
l' North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT Y.NIT PRICE /TOTAL
T"T ~. UP? M111t';_n . . 1 F.~l'h )'iS7~/~ "ç') tfltm
I Character generator that shall be capable of I ,- , ,
the following: '.,
ì
I A. Dual-microprocessor based with expandable
ROM program. ,
ì
I R Frame storage 32K-bytes of run-length
pnl'oding. with two frame buffers for ",
( seouential Picture generation.
,
-
ì-'- c 35 nanoseconds/Pixel Resolution
I D. 115 V AC + lno/ &on U'7 lnn I
,-... F. TTn-it- .'h",11 ,,<:<'" 1k" L"loDDv disk.
¡
.
1< .. . sh~ll be table top with 5' coiled
---
connector cord.
.
'-'
__i ,"
_-Lr î '/', ì ."-
L¡/i'{ c7 . . \
-... l./; '""; iF! ~-.
1;'
~Z;( "I f11
..-J , .
---- SUB-TOTAL I ~ '1-1 t17í
ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ~ 7 tp, ð7J .J
J
l
TERMS % ~ DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH
::¡ICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 'á-o DAYS FROM
,CEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
I Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
leS, or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
Jest rests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
, h10M BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
'RTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS.
IN SUBMITTING THIS BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC-
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR-
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH-
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI-
TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. ~
COMPïf;.' J.=1tD~7T"..s {bl (l1f#N¡G477~ 4LsI
BY' f.¡ /~ .so"";
~UMBeR' Br-~(; #S
, SIGNATURE: ¿fA ¿. DATE: //-7-¿;r
THIS IS' NOT A PURCHASE ORDE~
,·:,-16: ;;;:';
.1'
,..
GENERAL CONDITIONS
'--
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
I. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
- '- work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or condit~ons not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
,
~
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced value of any items.
(d) ~{here the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
.....
~~
~'-
-'"-
,-,,~. . -...
'" -- -- ---,-_.,.
,.
--
-~
~
.r
5. DISQUALIFICATION OF ,BIDDERS
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
7.
ASSIGNMENT
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8.
NOTICE OF DELAYS
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall iIT~ediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
respect thßreto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
~.
(a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
'--
'~
~_:.
"
GENERAL CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
I. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or condit~ons not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregular~ties of any Kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced value of any items.
(d) tVhere the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-èontractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
7. ASSIGNMENT
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8. NOTICE OF DELAYS
-
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice th~reof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
~-~
(a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product. his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
-
GENERAL CONDITIONS
VEHICLE BID
1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive
to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland
Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production
model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the
units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature
as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name
plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every
description that is usual for standard stock models of this series.
2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type
of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these
specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item
number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of North Richland
Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications
and its judgme~ ~ matters shall be conclusive.
Vendor Initial~
3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all
equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units
made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel.
4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed
literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the
vehicles he proposes to furnish.
5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin
and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit.
6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the xight to make multiple purchases from more
than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest.
7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from po~nt of
assembly to the City of. North Richland Hills area by railway freight or
conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or
part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an
affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this
invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of
manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be
driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills
provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed
one hundred (100) milés.
8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid.
This specification is intended to describe a tractor with backhoe and
loader with the equipment and options as listed below as a minimum
requirement.
TRACTOR :,]C.¡J / ~~" /3
Engine: Diesel Power 200 C.I.D./60 HP at 2200
Dual Air Cleaner: Dry
Front Axle Rating: 10,000 lb. (static)
Rear Axle Rating: 13,00 lb. (static)
Steering: Power
Throttles: Hand and Foot Control
~Cab: Pressurized with heater, defogger and
windshield wipers
Lights: Head lights front; dual lights
For rear / flashing mounted front and rear /
blue beacon mounted on top of cab
TRANSMISSION:
Torque Converter: Power shuttle
Four Forward
Four Reverse
Bidder Offers
7é/ ~¡ -7t)
~.>
I'" c~/6J:..
ifO ~,
:5. /.£ð"- /6...
f'i
lje::'
'II!" ~
'I~d
/J/ ~> 7
L{e~
¿¡e~
.¡ eS.
þ¡ ~-t/t~k-<'74..di~1'
" . 'J 0/
~r---' ! ß~~
,tr
~....
,.'" _7__ ~ _ ~ .:;;. -, p,;^-,~ "..../1 r-r
~.-c.J""'" ~-t/L7-~-"""'--- s:,.p¿,J;-....." ......,
é"<./Té:H,Ãi <; .
TIRE SIZE:
Rear 17.5L x 24 - 8 ply
Front IlL x 16 - 8 ply
BRAKES:
Hydraulic, self-adjusting; foot activated /
hand-operated parking brake
BACKHOE:
VDigging Depth: SAE 14 ft. with a 2411 H.D. bucket
Loading height: 10 ft.
Swing Arc: 1800 from center crant
Pump Capacity: 30 gpm at 2200 RPM's
Cap & Rods: Inclosed with heater and air
filtration
LOADER:
One yard capacity
Lift Force: Full
Brake Out Force:
bucket
height
7,000 lbs.
------_._-~
/
t¡r'-j
II"'.!
I
/L' ¡dij'
/.J.- /,'~
'/ë.S.- LIc" l~c¡'.J e~J /'N ~: {
c... I
/~n/~___I, c-~_ ('C7 "'~'A...rQ.l
¡ ,1
/1-~ /-v/ ~
lit: j I ð f /ø ' ,
'-I.;/~
if"'''''
,'l¡';c?
f
.2. / þ¿:> -; .0.. d~~r
L % (¡d'.
11...1. '
lit' !:
I ~ cc~
¡i" CG''V
I/:J~
',--
WARRANTY OFFERED:
S' e e.. /J T T/'t4'{ E-:J
W/t¡{/L,'iNrJ
(!.G I( T1 FI G.4-rf? 5
Number of days for delivery after receipt of
order.
Parts
Labor
Service Location
[ / . 0/'>"-,4 NI-- /-.s<'Þ /.ld.f . W /~ 15.£
/ ~""~/I &.~ ,S~ ".¡,..~ ~/é 1ST
j¿:.et¿£/{ ,T". þA e... /~<?<Íc,d
bt:' ß;.yj crt ];'7,vW( /l.R ò
Is bidder able to give demonstration, if required? C/~J
(~.¿( lJ:tߣ -v /J/kif.:¡; c, J" ~,.I.~ 4~-t'''''' ~_.
JCL4=z ' ~~1gnature required)
One Äo lete maintenaJje manual will be required with equipment.
_d&~ß'~.
~ (Signature required)
t»)/. co", ~~/
!ß
-.? '/' __ c-,../
/C/~.rZ.e //"....7 ,or-'
CIj (Yo/ /ll!c/I~·,V:,¿;-¡¿b(
2:J /.~ ,,¡;~
~Æ- ,;; . .rv
('""<:,s,' <r _
J c· ,-.
<.J t:' -
-
..s 7tJ~~¡;'''''rl.d
(¿r¡ ct.¿.;-J.
¿d,"t//l'¡f.'Fh-,v7 -(Í) 'p.Nt:: :/a..e.~ ..-, (.':>1'1/
/~,/ t,"'t?J / /Z- //.ëÆ'J" --/"~
S ¿J/>,lc,..¡e~~,2
ell. 15 cn.> /./A.
é.-<-T'/,L....- /-'¿AiC #''''Â/~
I~-:
(? "'p~ r/f",,-Nj
---r-
7¿~ '"
/)'''''"·....,1
.
ct'~tVJ: .
';)
) .r-r.e~<.'. d- ~ ¿.-.".:'" ~;"J/J /.,l./,}_ 7
P;¿A¿"'é:._ S;,2C.L.cn,4-e- /c,.//",C~/-I"'7
S 7?t.c~t Tv dp_ 5.. /l t1:. H,^- Ç.:r /3 ,~.4?e"~ ,"-';'
#red-
THe
/5.$ Ç?-
(7)
(1)
6//
f S j/Þd(
,J'£'"#t
&:"kÆ/hV /-If' ~d~
ßf d r-::J
/e,.N//.r.. 4; Þ¡:: _ /, é'~.4é4¿ï(j
-,2)j':..-Ä;.¿ S ;""Þc/C
ß4rrc-/fr
/-J^'/.J
A.0;r /"".
The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills,
on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general
conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be
attached and further certify
(a) ¡:a4 Á~-v IlttJcN ·.Me .
I
that our attached proposal submitted by
complies with all the specifications as
outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further
specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills
specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors
(b) -~;()~ -- (Æ )
exceptions.
And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of
any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
all proposals, or any part thereof.
tß¡ ;i....J /}¡o.k)., 6., ¿44~
Sign~
,/'"' ...",
~ .....".-
. A~..t.., ".{..pt
:
Title
/0.zft.(-
Date
24 /~N~iÂ' /}1ßéd, .//I-[
,
Company Name
THIS MUST ~ SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION
Vendor Note:
(a) Vendor: Company Name
Z.cj &~t(/.(/" jJ/Aé #. _T:,ir,
íec. / ,$'7 3'7?-FfC,l-
If None Write "NO"
?,
/) /t"7( /¿¿E~ /)(
p, }.
'7 €. ?- Ý..l'
(b) Number of Exceptions,
-Æ--
\
I
!
l
'" ·f'
" i~c't
CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
for TWo
51 648
Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Agenda Number: PU 85-53
a.m., bids for the above mentioned Ba~kboes.were opened and
EACH
TOTAL AMOUNT
No Bid
No Bid
$31,922
31,360
$63,844
62,720
57,244
o
28,622
1
26,500
25,824
--53 ,000
'--
o
51 ,64$
~ u
/ These two".oe.. will replace two worn-out units, one being 10 years old, the other
13 year.s ...4- ad will òe used by the Utility "Water Repairs" Department .
; I
I "
L''-~
,I Recomme~ J.pprove the purchase of
; i in the __~., $51,648.
LI
two 1400B Diesel Backhoes from *Rudy Brown, Inc.
I
'--I
J
¡
I
¡
i
!
!
.,
1';0:4
---
I
'-r
, Fi nance Review
. Finance Director
~
':City Manager
',' ..',. : '. Page 1 of 1
;,~:~~i;jj}-'~f~;~~~'~~'~,~~i-'~~~/<
1-'
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
~tar of the Metroplex
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
"'
- VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
R lJP'1 B/l.éw~ /11A-c./<I. +-NC--, Request For: Backhoe Tractors
Hl-ú~ ~'l7 kí /h/. 6~ /~--/ 15, 1985 10:00
Bid Opening Date: November at a.m.
1: o· BII~ /t!'78
¡¿€¿¿øl, Date:
"T)C ?" 'Z (-8 Requisition No.
Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. November 15, 1985
- - City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 CST
I 1/7 3 ?"-l;-~hJ¡- North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
4- TT E)/T 1()/fJ K L/~ Ý &.~-C-C¡'.v ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041
.~ ITEM DESCRIPTION ,. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 1) .'-'- 'T' J~/J /~7J/.3 :hé.léc- w'~ 2 Each A,6-;ß:L ¡¡~ ~¿ ~{L~ ~
6,Nd~le-.() CAB
~ Per Attached Specifications
Make .:J-t:.13
- Model /~~L,~j ¿) /¿.Y e¿ w/rAl' GN'é/&'.1 t~() ("·.....1~
FeJJnL155 ¿(." 17,1 - 4~~ 7-¥ b'¿~.\ç ¡.If>
- / f-. ~/ ;2.1 ;::1,4« f3"II~ ..,../ 9-Y u\. ~ d.e,4,jt/\
- /1/;'" lid:, L .,......f-e.rr.. ß~r
I - () ..d....J¡( Co-6- .....,/ S Til~l'3~ LT
- - ,4u 70 ~T(.Lf/.^, 'Tu 7:>,'c, L<Y"....J~1t 6~4-.
- '- '-- IS (r-:~".r~ ft¿.___)
- r-u..t..(. wo(l t( I r-c;
- Du~ ¿v,v:¿ $1-<'e¿dJ ¿'Vt I'~/u /rtt<-N rf. I< "A-tt )
- /1 ~<f-r- f)..,.:.I/t&.rá \.
-r , .j'''(.Þ¡'/() T:¡vs (.A..(..~'riOuv P/lCI( A-4€
- 7,. N 'T-¡;- IJ 5'.4-~ë"'" é?/.-...s; ~ ð"v ú~
- r;::", c.-L<> ~ CJI!eð -
'- ¿;¡;."'O/1(A-....... //t4;,7C:CTL<rW
I - -r:: L....U.. 'C",.(: Ól\-t3/VLAR;j
- 0' ~<.J~ 1.--7 \ TM", :> t .. N/lr(. ~ / Y
t;:.)<.f£ ¡. '1 d2/V't QLINK~~
r 1../ ' I:.)' 2- ~ II i) i-<-r /.) ¿« iC ¿ r- --.
-
- 10 P0 It ¿ }l /';' ;::14..""." Tt/t¿"
- I"> P"'-I / 1- 7 X- 2,t ¡¿é',,4-/f- 7í ¡t.-{',
I - D e./...I.A-f/ ¿" lAJA.<¡- ~ :ðJL4.!.r S' ~11
- I, 2-1 3 L¡tZ. I W /l1t!-/'r IV 'TV
- Lf.r I) If. . G i-<--,4/{/t,J(€éÒ r7,/1ltì~
I It /; A ( ¿ ,AI!, 1(,..IT7 SUB-TOTAL liZ, ¡Þ<J'8 ~
ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID Sl6"~
...
¡tlrr L/¡O,"N peL,,) c,¿r t- /ll'ra.:E;ÅJ$/'~7?<J^,
TERMS % DAYS, F.Ó.B. CITY OF NORTH (,0 .iJ./IyJ
RICHLANP HILLS: DELIVERY IN Gð DAYS FROM ð¡C S6Øf'le/{
RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
- ir>n Dept. reserYIIS the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
or t·.) award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
~t interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
ED FnOM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS.
IN SUBMITTING THI:s BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC-
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR-
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH-
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI-
TUTES A BINDING ONTRA<;J. Ao
COMPANY: (/,1)' 1:5/l~"¡ /,/A~H' r/VC.
BY: /Û.4 .
PHONE NUMBER:. ~ 91,7 37tf'-S-9¿J- . I
SIGNATURE: Z..ø þtrrvr-v DATE: ////Z/P.J""
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER
ARc
-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~~Departm.nt;
. $ubject:
Purchasing " Council Meeting Date:
Bid Award to Sutpben.Corporation.for One Custom
APd.<l1 T.A,iðeT rl1J4:Pr'.1:rn~Jc j:p tttt\ Á' JInt!nt·Qf $~1't~96 Agenda Number:
11-25-85
PU 85-54
\ ...-..<'
, On October 30, 1985 at 10:00 a~m., bids for ,the above mentioned equipment were opened and
are outlined below:
VENDOR
. EXCEPTIONS
AMOUNT
& L Seagrave
No Bid
, Pirsch Fir~ Apparatus
No Bid
,Pierce Fire Apparatus
No Bid
.' ~TI Company
9
$369,810
LTI Company
9
373,906
LTI Company
LTI'Company
9
9
3
Less (For~.Prepayment)
Less (Wheel Change)
Less (Buying Both Trucks)
367,388
371,489
*Sutphen Còrpo~ation
. I
\
389,956
11 ,360
950
2,250
$375,396
The items listed below show what the fire department specified and the exceptions taken
by LTI.
I.TI'sletter of introduction states their proposal is their own specification and not
,hat specified by:the City of North Richland Hills. .
PITY·SPECIFICATIONS
BIDDERS EXCEPTION
1. Reat'.sxle weight when loaded
to be listed.
L,Not listed.
2. Hose bed shall hold a minimum
of 1,000' of 5" fire hose.
2. Amount of hose not listed.
3. Water tank capacity of 500 gallons.
3. Water tank of 200 gallons.
Finance. Review
~C)~rCøÞfFunds: Acct. Number 01-90-02-6600
~~OIR.V·~t ~U f è4r~~;~
Department Head Signa .. .. .'... ~nager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION. ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
4
L
Sutphen's three exceptions suggest changing from a steel cab to aluminum, from
aluminum wheels ,to steel and mounting the fire hOse in a different location for
better overall balance of the truck. All of the above actually enhance our
specifications.
~
L
RecoDllnendation; Approve bid award to *Sutphen Corporation for one aerial Ladder
Tqwer'truckit{the amount of $375,396 less discounts and wave all exceptions.
~
I
I
L
'--
~
~
~
L
l....-.
-
L
~,
J
,
GENERAL CONDITIONS
'--..
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees· to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
I. WITHDRA~HNG PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2.
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
r
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3.
IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or condit~ons not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
~E
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced value of any items.
(d) ~Vhere the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
"
J
5." DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
f
~ Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, allY sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next'monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
,. "
ASSIGNMENT
'--
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Mariager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8.
NOTICE OF DELAYS
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing: to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
-.
9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
£
¡"",.,::::--
l
',--<-
r (a).' If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
,
'-
-f
~
',<:,-
GENERAL CONDITIONS
VEHICLE BID
1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive
to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland
Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production
model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the
units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature
as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name
plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every
description that is usual for standard stock models of this series.
2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type
of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these
specifications must b outlined on a separate document noting the item
number and fully exp i the exceptions. The City of North Richland
Hills reserves the ght evaluate variations from the specifications
and its judgment su atters shall be conclusive.
Vendor Initial
3. The units sh 1 be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all
~ equipment in uding standard and extra equipment installed, and the units
made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel.
4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed
literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the
vehicles he proposes to furnish.
5. The successful bidder shall furnish a man~lfacturer's Certificate of origin
and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit.
6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more
than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest.
7. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid.
-f
"..'" ~.,..
<.
, I
-
The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills,
on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general
conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be
attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by
(a) SUTPHEN CORPORATION complies with all the specifications as
outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further
specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills
specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors
(b)
three (3)
exceptions.
And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of
any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
all proposals, or any part thereof.
r
,,~ -
Title
October 30, 1985
Date
SUTPHEN CORPORATION
Company Name
THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION
Vendor Note:
-£
(a) Vendor: Company Name
(b) Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO"
)---
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
.,.
-... ",tar of the 'Metroplex
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
Request For: Aerial Tower Apparatus
Sutphen Corporation October 30, 1985 10:00 a.m.
7000 Columbus-Marysville Rd. Bid Opening Date: at
Amlin, Ohio 43002 Date:
Requisition No.
Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. October 30, 1985
City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: City Secretarv Phone: (817) ?R 1 -n0111
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE I~ TOTAL
1 Apr; '" 1 'T'nTJør Ih,,,, 1 Each 389, 9.s1,~ en
Make SUTPHEN CORPORATION
Mnr1pl TSlOO+
:
Per Attached City of North Richland Hills !
Specification!': !
" I
¡
r-~
i
.
---J
~ " --- .
SUB-TOTAL Al-
\. ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 7'":389 7~ E:.7..I.
w '/
* TERMS % DAYS, F.O.B. ~):::''<)f~ORTH
RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 240-280Tb'ÀW~ROM
RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
- f 'ept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
_ or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
'1:\est interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
- NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS.
*See Proposal (Purchase Agreement)
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER
....,'.,.,~,'.,_::;...... -~1
"'¡,_'.1
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'--
Department:
Purchasin~
Bid Award 1500 GPM Pumper to Sutphen
Corporation in the Amount of $145,370.
Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Agenda Number: PU 85-55
Subject:
On October 30, 1985 at 10:00 a.m., bids for the above mentioned item' were opened and are
outlined below:
A. LTI - Proposal I
LTI - Proposal II
LTI - Proposal III
LTI - Proposal IV
B. Pirsch
C. Quality Pumper
D. *Sutphen Corporation
20 $157,327
20 160,755
20 154,355
20 157,783
0 146,079
8 139,656
3 149,731
(Less Prepayment 4,361
Discount) 145,370
Th~ bid proposal submitted by "Quality Manufacturing" have taken some exceptions to the
fire pumper specifications published by the City of North Richland Hills.
Listed below are the specifications and exceptions listed in the above bid.
,-1"-....
I
SPECIFICATIONS
EXCEPTIONS
1. Diesel engine to have an emergency
shut-down control.
1. No emergency shut-down.
-I
I
_I
¡
-i
I
-~I
~i
I
I
I
--I
2. 1500 G.P.M. "Hale" fire pump.
2. 1500 G.P.M. "Waterous" fire pump.
3. Pump shift to be manually operated.
3. Pump shift to be electrically operated.
4. Running boards to be spaced ~" from
body.
4. Running boards mounted against body.
5. Rub rails to be mounted ~" from body.
5. Rub rails mounted against body.
6. Two individually controlled two-speed
electric windshield wipers.
6. Two air-operated windshield wipers.
Finance Review
Acct. Number 01-90-02-6550
SUfflCleß;S )7;~
te'V\ -
Department Head Signatu ' City Manager
ITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
-
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
2
...',..M.......'
--
"--/
-
4 & 5.
'---
L '1
7. Fuel tank to be bolted in place.
7. Unclear as to the removability of
this fuel tank.
8. Two (2) four-light sequential
warning lights on front of cab.
8. Lighting arrangement is nothing
similar to City specifications.
CITY SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS
1.
The emergency shut-down is a must as there will be times when the fire apparatus
is exposed to butane and/or propane fumes which cause the diesel to become a
run-away. This emergency shut-down system is the only turn-off system which
will prevent an explosion and fire.
2.
The "Hale" pump was specified because it is a gear driven pump and reduces the
different types of spare parts needed to be on hand, as we now have several "Hale"
fire pumps in service. The "Waterous" pump is a chain driven pump.
3.
Throughout the years the fire department has had pump shifters which were vacuum,
electric and air-operated. All of these will eventually fail after several years
of service. Should these methods fail, then a manual system (underneath the
truck) is provided. To save on money, maintenance, and time we went to the
manual system which will not fail.
We asked for a ~" space between the running boards/rub-rails and body. This
type of construction will eliminate the deterioration of the firefighting
compartment. When aluminum and steel are mounted togethe~ metal breakdown is
caused creating rust to steel and corrosion to aluminum. This truck should
provide the City service for over twenty (20) years provided the fire fighting
unit remains intact.
6. Two electrically operated windshield wipers were specified as they are the most
dependable on the market and seldom fail. The air-operated ones in service at
this time sometimes fail to function, leak air when not in use and require
frequent replacement.
7.
The requirement that the fuel tank be bolted to the apparatus is a must. If
the tank is damaged, it must be repaired by welding; this cannot be safely done
without complete removal and draining of the fuel tank to prevent fire and/or
explosion.
8.
The sequential lighting system was specified to give maximum visibility while
on emergency calls. This system is presently in use and we have not experienced
any motor vehicle accidents involving fire apparatus.
Recommendation: Approve the purchase of one Custom Pumper in the amount of
$145,370 to *Sutphen Corporation and wave exceptions.
.:~\,:·-,,,,-:,,,_,,;'.':ii',,>·.'~",,o.-
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
GENERAL CONDITIONS
.'---....;.
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
I. WITHDRA\HNG PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2.
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
,
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
'-
3.
IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves thê right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced value of any items.
(d) \Vhere the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
,
- _.""'::-...""'.....-11.............--.,
5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
'---
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
,
7. ASSIGNMENT
--'
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8.
NOTICE OF DELAYS
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
r'~spect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
- ,
'h
'''''-.1>.~ ._
'----.....
~
/'
..
^' .........".........-'-
(a) . If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
,
~'.......
,.
.'-----..~
/
'--
GENERAL CONDITIONS
VEHICLE BID
1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive
to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland
Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production
model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the
units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature
as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name
plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every
description that is usual for standard stock models of this series.
2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type
of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these
specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item
number and fully ex in ng the exceptions. The City of North Richland
Hills reserves the to evaluate variations from the specifications
and its judgment n smatters shall be conclusive.
Vendor Initial
3. The units s a be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all
equipment í luding standard and extra equipment installed, and the units
made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel.
4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed
literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the
vehicles he proposes to furnish.
5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manµfacturer's Certificate of origin
and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit.
6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more
than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest.
7. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid.
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
'-, .ar of the 'Metroplex
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS "'
SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
SUTPHEN CORPORATION Request For: Pumper Apparatus
7000 Columbus-Marysville Rd. Bid Opening Date: October 30, 1985 at 10:00 a.m.
Amlin, Ohio 43002 Date:
Requisition No.
Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. October 30, 1985
City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE I; TOTAL
,
1 Pumner Annaratu~ 1 1<'!>f'n '/49, '7?L ðO¡
/
I
M::akø Sutphen Corporation
Model Sutphen Custom CF-l.~UU
Per Attached Citv of North Richland Hi"~
1--..... 8neci fi ,,::at i....,,'"
~
--
-
-
-
--
-
-,
SUB-TOTAL JJ
l ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ~ /~ ?.3t-~
"
TERMS * % DA2B-ó.'~~nCITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN worKlng DAYS FROM
RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
~ iry '~pt. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
r to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
1>-. 'interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
- NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS.
*See proposal (standard purchase agreement)
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER
N
10/30/85
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance
Award Bid för Hand-Held Meter Reading Equipment
Subject: to Municipal Software in Amount of $25,710
_ Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Agenda Number: PU85-56
The City of North Richland Hills advertised and received bids for the delivery and
installation of hand-held water meter reading 'equipment for the Utility Billing
and Collection Department as provided in the 1985-86 budget. The City received
four bids tabulated as follows:
COMPANY NAME AMOUNT OF BID
1. Porta-Printer Systems, Inc. $37,432.00
2. Rockwell-International 34,767.45
3. Datamatic 31,800.00
* 4. Municipal Software Consultants, Inc. 25,710.00
Recommendation
It is the recommendation of the Staff that the contract he awarded to *Municipal Software
Consultants in the amount of $25,710 for purchase of six hand-held water meter reading
devices, related equipment and computer software. Distribution of the expenditures are
as follows:
......
02-20-02-6500
02-20-02-4800
Total Amount
$21,210.00
4,500.00
$25,170.00
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
Operating Budget
Other
-x
Finance Review
Acct. Number see above
Sufficie u ds Available
t Finance Director
"---
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
,~:~_'~~?J<~i',;:~_>li",;'.i
Page 1 of
1
'--
CITY OF
NORTH TiICHLAND HILLS
Department: Administration
Proposal by City of Watauga for Purchase of
Subject: Water and Sewer System
Council Meeting Date: 11-25-85
Agenda Number: PU 85-57
"-,
It is requested that the City Council determine the terms and conditions under which
Watauga's portion of the water and sewer system would be sold to that city.
--
Recommendation:
Council determine terms and conditions.
--
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/A
Sufficient Funds Available
'--
~ft ,~,~
Oepartment Heed Slgnalure . .. '-(;1 anage,
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
{
'·~·'i;:'~}.~~~:!f.-'·~·''''.;;';t'~.i$::<;;j'4_~';~¡::'·4f.;,~.~~t',;;)~···"""¡'~;~\"~":f':;'·+~>i·(¡~.,.-N;"
I
I
, ¡ ,," .. Page 1 of
;""'_"~'~;'~4~~;~,·)w;";.·~;1t·_~··~:;¿·,~>~.-
1
7101 WHITLEY ROAD * WATAUGA, TEXAS 76148 * (817) 281.8047
November 13,1985
Mayor and City Council
of North Rich1and Hills
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
Fort Worth, Texas. 76118
Mayor Dan Echols
5016'Navada
Ft.Worth, Texas. 76118
Mayor Pro-tem Richard Davis
6617 Hillside Ct.
Ft. Worth, Texas. 76118
Councilwoman Marie Hinkle
6256 G1enview Dr., Apt. 260
Ft. Worth, Texas. 76118
Councilman Jim Kenna
4025 Diamond Loch East
Ft.Worth, Texas. 76118
Councilwoman Virginia Moody
7720 Cedar Park Ave.
Ft.Worth, Texas. 76180
Councilman Dick Fisher
5504 Susan Lee
Ft.Worth, Texas. 76118
-
Councilman Jim Ramsey
4604 Lariat Dr.
Ft.Worth, Texas. 76118
Councilman Harold Newman
6125 Riveria
Ft.Worth, Texas. 76118
RE: Purchase of Water and Sewer System
Dear Mayor Echols and City Council:
I am writing in response to a letter dated October 17,
1985 from Mayor Dan Echols. to myself on behalf of the
City of Watauga wherein Mayor Echols invited a firm
purchase offer for the Watauga portion of the now existing
water works and sewer system.
-
Please recall our discussions and negotiations during
the latter part of 1984 and during January 1985 wherein
the City of North Rich1and Hills had offered to sell the
t-7atauga portion of the water and sewer system for an '
amount equal to the bond indebtedness of that respective
percentage of the system. Please further recall that the
City of Watauga undertook a charter amendment election on
January 19,1985 in an effort to resolve the tax rate
ceiling contained in our charter and improve our bond
rating for purposes of this purchase. As I am certain
you are aware, this particular amendment failed to pass
during that election. Since that time, the City of Watauga
has undertaken to explore other avenues available to fund
this purchase. From your letter of October 17,1985, it
is my understanding that the offer to purchase the Watauga
portion of the water and sewer system for an amout equal
to the bonded indebtedness of that percentage of the
system has been withdrawn and that the City of North
Rich1and Hills is inviting the City of Watauga to make
a firm purchase offer at this time.
Please be advised by this letter that the City of
Watauga is offering to purchase the Watauga portion of
the water and sewer system for an amount equal to six
million five hundred thousand dollars.
This offer to purchase is made expressly conditional
on the passage of a bond issue presented to the citizens
of Watauga at an election on this matter and the subsequent
issuance and sale of such bonds to fund this purchase.
Please be aware that the City of Watauga has called an
election concerning the issue of the issuance of such bonds
for January 11,1986. Further, the City of Watauga contem-
plates a time frame of 60 days following any successful
bond election before the development packet can be
compiled and the bonds sold. Still further, we anticipate
an additional 30-45 days time period from that date in
order to secure the funds necessary for this purchase.
',-
'--
Page 3
Our ability to make this purchase at the above
specified offer price is expressly conditional on the
factors set forth above,
This offer shall remain in effect until Tuesday,
November 26,1985 in order to allow your consideration of
the same at your next regularly scheduled council meeting.
Thank you for your attention to the above.
Sincerely,
~ ~4: ch~k~-'~
V~ :.1.. Anthony, Sr, ( (
Mayor, City of Watauga
VRA / rms
·
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
-
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
November 20, 1985
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-500, CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
WATAUGA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM
ESTIMATED CURRENT VALUE
'---
As you requested we have prepared an approximate evaluation of the present
worth of the Watauga water and sewer system. A more comprehensive inventory
of system components and determination of value may be required to satisfy
legal and/or fiscal regulations governing purchase of the systems.
We would note that the methods used in this evaluation indicate a reasonable
estimate of the systems' worth that could deviate as much as 1/3 either way
from the following:
Water Systen ................. $ 8,301,000
Sewer System ................. $ 9,708,000
------------
TOTAL ......................., $18,009,000
Attached are summary tabulations showing the basis of this approximate
estimate. Two basic approaches were utilized to determine the present-day
worth of individual sections of the systems:
(l) All available final contractors' invoices were reviewed to ascertain
(a) scope of project, (b) year of completion, and (c) final costs of
construction. The latter were then adjusted by straight-line depreciation
based on a 50-year useful project life and by appreciation based on the
ratio of construction cost indices at the time of construction and the date
of our estimates.
(2) In the absence of actual final construction invoices, (a) an
approximation of project scope was prepared from system grid maps, (b) a
construction cost was developed from unit costs estimated from current
construction costs and (c) the time of construction was estimated by
individual plat filing dates. Resulting estimated construction costs were
then adjusted by depreciation as above.
Please call if you have any questions.
continued, next page
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
""---
November 20, 1985
WATAUGA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM
Page
2
RI~~
RWA/bvg
Enclosures
cc. Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City t1anager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assist. Dir. of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
CITY OF WATAUGA
*** ESTIMATED CURRENT VALUE OF WATER SYSTEM ***
($l,OOO'S)
20-NOV-i985 ----) ENR FACTOR =
LOCATION
-------------------
Schellinger Addition
Watauga Addition
Browning Hts. North
Browning Hts. North
Browning Hts. North
Browning Hts. North
Browning Hts. North
Browning Hts. North
Ec ho Hi 11 s
Echo Hills
Echo Hills
Echo Hills
Echo Hills
Bunker Hill
Bun ker Hi 11
Bunker Hill
Watauga Heights
Watauga He i ghts
Astor Heights
Astor Heights
Astor Heights
Astor Heights
Singing Hills
Sunnybrook Addition
Sunnybrook Addition
Sunnybrook Addition
Sunnybrook Addition
Foster Vi 11 age
Foster Vi 11 age
Fos ter Vi 11 age
Foster Vi 11 age
Foster Village
Bristol Square
Watauga Hts. East
Brookdale Heights
. .. Cont i nued Next Page
NOTES:
4, 192.9 '
1985
Page 1
CONST. ENR(2) DEPR. APPREP. PRESENT
COST(l) YEAR HJOEX FACT.(3) FACT. (4) VALUE
-------
$80.8
$112.2
$22.9
$64.5
$15.2
$34.5
$11.7
$23.7
$25.7
$20.5
$20.5
$211.4
$249.8
$28.9
$108.9
$173.6
$29. 1
$28.7
$22.3
$13.6
$27.9
$35.8
$22.3
$152.4
$269.6
$229.4
$92.0
$53.1
$82.5
$163.6
$191. 5
$459.5
$175.7
$150.3
$125.0
--------
1980 3,198.9
1981 3,510.3
1961 850.4
1965 971.1
1967 1,072 .0
1967 1,072.0
19681,154.2
1969 1,285.0
1971 1,575.0
1971 1,575.0
1972 1 ,711. 9
1978 2,747.3
1982 3,790.9
1971 1,575.0
1974 1,993.5
1981 3,510.3
1969 1,285.0
1970 1,368.7
1966 1,028.7
1968 1,154.2
1969 1,285.0
1970 1,368.7
1965 971.1
1977 2,540.6
1979 2,982.4
1981 3,510.3
1983 4,011. 3
1973 1,896.2
19741,993.5
1976 2,345.1
1978 2,747.3
1981 3,510.3
1980 3,198.1
1972 1,711.9
19782,747.3
--------
0.900
0.920
0.520
0.600
0.640
0.640
0.660
0.680
0.720
0.720
O. 740
0.860
0.940
0.720
0.780
0.920
0.680
0.700
0..620
0.660
0.680
0.700
0.600
0.840
0.880
0.920
0.960
0.760
0.780
0.820
0~860
0.920
0.900
o .740
0.860
--------
1.311
1.194
4.931
4.318
3.911
3.911
3.633
3.263
2.662
2.662
2.449
1.526
1. 106
2.662
2.103
1.194
3.263
3.063
4.076
3.633
3.263
3..063
4.318
1.650
1 . 406
1.194
1.045
2.211
2.103
1.788
1. 526
1.194
1.311
2.449
1. 526
----------
$95.3
$123.3
$58.7
$167.1
$38.0
$86.4
$28.1
$52.6
$49.3
$39.3
$37.2
$277 .5
$259.7
$55.4
$178.7
$190.8
$64.6
$61. 5
$56.4
$32.6
$61. 9
$76.8
$57.8
$211. 3
$333.5
$252.1
$92.3
$89.2
$135.3
$239.9
$251. 3
$504.9
$207.3
$272.4
$164. 1
(1) Costs include 15% for engineering and administration
(2) Engineering News Record Cost Index
(3) Based on straight line depreciation over a 50-year project life
(4) Based on ratio of ENR Index for year constructed to value for today
pag e 2
CITY OF ~IATAUGA
*** ESTIMATED CURRENT VALUE OF WATER SYSTEM ***
($I,OOO'S)
20-NOV-1985 ----) ENR FAtTOR =
4,192.9
1985
CONST. ENR( 2) DEPR. APPREP. PRESENT
LOCATION COST(I) 'YEAR I NO E X FACT.(3) FACT . ( 4 ) VALUE
------------------- ------- ----- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Greenfield Village $675.4 1982 3,790.3 0.940 1. 106 $702.3
Pump Sta. and I~a in $957.9 1979 2,982.4 0.880 1.406 $1,185.1
Rufe Snow 16/1 $671.3 1979 2,982.4 0.880 1.406 $830.5
Watauga 8/1 $8.9 1966 1,028.7 0.620 4.076 $22.5
\olataug a 12/1 $15.7 1969 1,285.0 0.680 3.263 $34.8
Qua i 1 MeadO\"s , $317.4 1985 4,192.9 1.000 1.000 $317.4
U. S. 377 16/1,24/1 $309.7 1984 4, 160 . 5 0.980 1.008 $305.9
TOTAL ESTH1ATED PRESENT \oJORTH, WATER SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8,300,955
NOTES:
(1) Costs include 15% for engineering and administration
(2) Engineering News Record Cost Index
(3) Based on straight line depreciation. over a 50-year project life
(4) Bas~d on ratio of ENR Index for year constructed to value for today
Pag e 3
CITY OF ~JATAUGA
*** ESTI!1ATEO CURRENT VALUE OF SEWER SYSTEM ***
($l,OOO'S)
20-NOV-1985 ----) ENR FACTOR :;: 4,192.9 1985
CONST. ENR(2) OEPR. APPRE P. PRESENT
LOCATION COST(l)' YEAR I NO E X FACT. (3) FACT. ( 4) VALUE
------------------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Schellinger Addition $4.0 1980 3,198.9 0.900 1.311 $4.7
Watauga Addition $15.0 1981 3,510.3 0.920 1.194 $16.5
Browning Hts. North $40.3 1961 850.4 0.520 4.931 $103.3
Browning Hts. North $38.2 1965 971. 1 0.600 4.318 $99.0
Browning Hts. North $16.5 1967 1,072 . 0 0.640 3.911 $41.3
Browning Hts. North $30.4 1967 1,072.0 0.640 3.911 $76.1
Browni ng Hts. North $17.7 1968 1,154.2 0.660 3.633 $42.4
Browning Hts. North $121.9 1969 1,285.0 0.680 3.263 $270.5
Echo Hill s $53.4 1971 1,575.0 0.720 2.662 $102.4
Echo Hills $24.0 1971 1,575.0 0.720 2.662 $46.0
Echo Hill s $24.0 1972 1,711.9 0.740 2.449 $43.5
Echo Hills $216.7 1978 2,747.3 0.860 1.526 $284.4
Echo Hills $244.0 1982 3,790.9 0.940 1.106 $253.7
Bunker Hill $37.9 1971 1,575.0 0.720 2.662 $72.6
Bunker Hill $119.8 1974 1,993.5 0.780 2.103 $196.5
Bun ker Hi 11 $196.6 1981 3,510.3 0.920 1.194 $216.0
Watauga Heights $43.3 1969 1,285.0 0.680 3.263 $96.1
t~atauga Heights $26.5 1970 1,368.7 0.700 3.063 $56.8
Astor Heights $19.0 1966 1,028.7 0.620 4.076 $48.0
Astor Heights $10.6 1968 1,154.2 0.660 3.633 $25.4
Astor Heights $41. 0 1969 1,285.0 0.680 3.263 $91.0
Astor Heights $21. 5 1970 1,368.7 0.700 3.063 $46.1
Singing Hills $38.0 1965 971. 1 0.600 4.318 $98.4
Sunnybrook Addition $157.3 1977 2,540.6 0.840 1. 650 $218.1
Sunnybrook Addition $232.6 1979 2,982.4 0.880 1.406 $287.8
Sunnybrook Addition $259.3 1981 3,510.3 0.920 1.194 $284.9
Sunnybrook Addition $71. 5 1983 4,011.3 0.960 1.045 $71. 7
-Fos ter Vi 11 age $184.1 1974 1,993.5 0.780 2.103 $302.0
Foster Village $140.8 1976 2,345.1 0.820 1.788 $206.4
Fos ter Vi 11 age $135.4 1978 2,747.3 0.860 1.526 $177.7
Foster Vi 11 age $497.2 1981 3,510.3 0.920 1. 194 $546.4
Bristol Square $171.4 1980 3,198.1 0.900 1.311 $202.2
Wataug a Hts. East $173.8 1972 1,711.9 O. 7 40 2.449 $315.0
Brookdale Heights $102.0 1978 2,747.3 0.860 1. 526 $133.9
... Continued Next Page
NOTES:
( 1 ) Costs include 15% for engineering and administration
(2 ) Engineering News Record Cost Index
- (3 ) Based on straight line depreciation over a 50-year project life
(4) Based on ratio of ENR Index for year constructed to value for today
.
pag e 4
CITY OF \·JATAUGA
, *** ESTIMATED CURRENT VALUE OF SEWER SYSTEM ***
($l,OOO'S)
20-NOV-i985 ----) ENR FACTOR = 4,192.9 ' 1985
CONST. ENR( 2) DEPR. APPRE P. PRESENT
LOCATION COST(l) YEAR INDEX FACT.(3) FACT. (4) VALUE
------------------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Greenfield Village $562.8 1982 3,790.3 0.940 1.106 $585.2
18" Dia. Outfall $506.4 1979 2,982.4 0.880 1.406 $626.5
I~aurie Dr. Sewer $5.7 1979 2,982.4 0.880 1.406 $7.1
15"&18" Dia. Para 11 . $42.9 1966 1,028.7 0.620 4.076 $108.4
15" Dia. Parallel $189.9 1969 1,285.0 0.680 3.263 $421. 4
Qua il t~eadows $239.8 1985 4,192.9 1. 000 1.000 $239.8
Eas t Slope Sewer $224.5 1985 4,192.9 1.000 1.000 $224.5
~Jest Slope Sewer $483.0 1985 4,192.9 1. 000 1.000 $483.0
Cap. in F. W. 48" $1,000.0 1985 4,192.9 1.000 1.000 $1,000.0
Wat. Trunk Ph 1(30") $290.6 1985 4,192.9 1.000 1.000 $290.6
Hat. Trun k Ph 2( 27") $652.1 1984 4, 160 . 5 0.980 1.008 $644.0
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRESENT WORTH, SEWER SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $9,707,513
*** TOTAL WATER AND SEWER ESTIMATED PRESENT WORTH
. . . . . . . . .
$18,008,468
-----------
-----------
NOTES:
(1) Costs include 15% for engineering and administration
(2) Engineering News Record Cost Index
(3) Based on straight line depreciation over 'a 50-year project life
(4) Based on ratio of ENR Index for year constructed to value for today
RESOLUTION NO. 85-32
WHEREAS, the City Staff has attempted to purchase that certain
33.1104 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey for the purpose of construction
of a municipal golf course and appurtenances as a city park facility; and
WHEREAS, said tract is required for public purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
In the event that the City Staff is not successful in negotiating the
purchase of the tract of land described in Exhibit "A", the City Attorney is
hereby authorized to procure said tract through eminent domain proceedings.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 25th day of November, 1985.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
..
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
"'II'!-~'.';:_,:';ik:'.""'" .....,~~M~·.·,~ ;'·"\'~"I >',;¡'c'l.t#~..d_-"';/ "';">"'~;:"'~-'-'
_ _ Mè·,'ol4 ¿';..t~';::. :.;;~~''':~~~.~'f.~~\,-,;·,·,'~;''4'''q.;,.",..::..", ..J:';";":.,:.i~~;'~"" ,- \. ..i+i¡.,~
~
"EXHIBIT A"
BEING a tract of land situated in the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19,
City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being part of that
certain tract conveyed to Ronald D. Campbell by deed recorded in Volume 7998,
Page 526, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly
described as follows:
COMMENCING at an iron rod at the southeast corner of said Campbell tract; said
point being in the westerly right-of-way line of the St. Louis and
Southwestern Railroad (a 100-foot right-of-way);
THENCE S 89° 27' 08" W, along the south line of said Campbell tract, a
distance of 160.44 feet to an iron rod at the POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 89° 27' 08" W, along said south line of the Campbell tract, a
distance of 827.79 feet to an iron rod;
THENCE Northerly along the western boundary of the 100-year flood plain limits
of Fossil Creek as follows:
N 26° 35' 21" E, 35.68 feet; N 27° 57' 56" E, 95.72 feet; N 16° 13' 01"
E, 94.48 feet; N 02° 08' 54" E, 105.24 feet; N 34° 01' 21" W, 148.40
feet; N 06° 40' 50" W. 102.21 feet; N 16° 28' 06" E. 398.63 feet; N 210
00' 50" W, 78.91 feet; N 26° 37' 10" E, 98.42 feet; N 12° 18' 45" E,
119.94 feet; N 61° 29' 22" W, 60.70 feet; N 43° 41' 46" W, 56.01 feet; N
19° 00' 06" W. 79.05 feet; N 04° 01' 45" W, 53.84 feet; S 32° 57' 54" E,
119.30 feet; S 27° 53' 55" E. 62.75 feet; S 84° 42' 05" E, 97.12 feet; N
61° 49' 46" E. 224.98 feet; S 89° 25' 40" E. 227.16 feet; S 72° 25' 12"
E, 55.::22 feet; N 78° 52' 54" E, 96.83 feet; N 60° 28' 58" E. 93.78 feet;
N 44° 59' 36" E. 96.48 feet; N 05° 06' 33" E, 151.03 feet; N 04° 05' 27"
W, 262.33 feet; N 02° 11' 44" W, 133.88 feet; N 15° 29' 40" W, 46.54
feet; N 31° 01' 20" W. 92.13 feet; N 50° 05' 26" W, 22.06 feet to an iron
rod for corner in the south right-of-way line of Browning Boulevard (a
60-foot-right-of-way);
THENCE N 89° 27' 00" E, along said south right-of-way line of Browning
Boulevard, a distance of 531.95 feet to an iron rod;
THENCE Southerly along the eastern boundary of the 100-year flood plain limits
of Fossil Creek as follows:
S 31° 50' 27" E, 49.24 feet; S 64° 36' 04" W, 56.06 feet; SOlo 40' 56"
E, 131.09 feet; S 10° 07' 33" E, 261.98 feet; S 79° 26' 45" E, 59.35
feet; N 61°-40' 42" E, 126.89 feet; N 28° 58' 24" E. 32.85 feet; N 440
45'33" W, 41.39 feet; N 76° 51' 27" E, 50.80 feet; S 05° 39' 48" E.
41.22 feet; S 25° 33' 06" W, 44.40 feet; S 47° 25' 54" W, 175.25 feet; S
03° 58' 17" W, 72.98 feet; N 77° 37' 37" W, 56.71 feet; S 13° 16' 18" W,
89.67 feet; S 40° 57' 15" E, 68.20 feet; S 89° 31' 03" E. 74.37 feet; S
29° 01' 57" E, 31.26 feet; S 76° 43' 07" W, 44.26 feet; S 44° 19' 24" W.
101.43 feet; S 64° 18' 26" E, 79.51 feet; S 64° 40' 34" W, 80.18 feet; S
52° 55' 00" W, 95.38 feet; S 72° 18' 07" W, 40.88 feet; S 42° 43' 09" W,
121.41 feet; S 54° 39' 27" W, 126.67 feet; S 58° 18' 43" W, 181.53 feet;
S 78° 31' 45" W, 68.55 feet; N 88° 50' 54" W, 75.17 feet; N 79° 28' 48"
W. 107.28 feet; S 72° 59' 56" W, 82.99 feet; S 04° 26' 16" W, 94.33 feet;
S 12° 15' 52" E, 84.15 feet; S 03° 02' 30" E, 62.16 feet; S 10° 59' 31"
W, 143.33 feet; S 13° 33' 12" E, 185.35 feet; S 27° 51' 00" E, 236.44
feet; S 28° 00' 09" E, 119.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and
CONTAINING 33.1104 acres of land.
1..... ,r",_'';'':'~.l'''..tN.:''~ t~~""1"'-;'''''''_ ¡...."'\,..:'.., ....
_:....-.>~,~..,;.:~~"'~ ¡j¡:-':'.i~lff~i¿;'';~';'~~'':.f:'''~'h~1r . ~.~...... 'w-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works
Council Meeting Date:
12-29-85
/
Subject:
Partial Pay Estimate HI to Austin Road Company in
the amount ot $]b,44~.H¿ - Mun1c1pal complex ~1te
Improvements
Agenda Number:
PAY 85-57
We have two contracts on the municipal complex site. One is for the
buildings and the other is for the site work. This pay estimate is
for the site work and Austin Road has the contract to do this work.
Most of this estimate is for the on-site and off-site sanitary
sewer line.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of the payment to Austin Road Company
in the amount of $36,449.82.
Funding Source:
Pay estimate #l to be distributed as follows:
09-60-00-6750
13-90-01-6150
$ 3l,250.25
$ 5,199.57
$ 36,449.82
Finance Review
See above
-. I
~
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) GO & Rev SU~flCIÄdS Available
Operating Budget _ --r7?
Other ~ -¡pc () 0 () - Kff?~"
Department ~~ ' City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 ofl
'~
·
K NOWL TON-E NG LI SH-F LOWE RS, I NC,
---,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth· Dallas
November 19, 1985
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-335, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE II1PROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.1
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.1, dated
November 19, 1985, made payable to Austin Road Co., in the amount of
$36,449.82, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of October 31, 1985.
'-
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your
representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and
we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend thåt this payment, in amount of $36,449.82, be made to Austin
Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Fort ~Jorth, TX, 76113.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank
estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may
have concerning this project.
ß;N-ti!, ~
R I C HA RD W. AL BIN, P. E .
RWAl1l d
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
/ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ ic \Jorks
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector (Street & Drainage)
Mr. Scott Jenogan ,
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
1~&ft~~JT~~D~'5UITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367