HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1983-07-25 Agendas
c
C
'\Z.':>-
- "'--
City of ~orth '1UcWand Hills
~tar of the ~etroplex
TO: City Council Members
REF.: PWM-0032-83
FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works
DATE: July 18, 1983
SUBJECT: The Building Code and Abatement Board of Appeals
and the Zoning Board of Adjustments
We are still in need of five names for the Building and
Abatement Code Board of Appeals and in addition. rwo
names for alternate. We do not have any cases for this
Board at the present time but we are beginning to send
out notices to people concerning their dangerous structures.
We are also in need of two alternates for the Zoning
Board of Adjustments. The last meeting of the Zoning
Board of Adjustments was postponed because of lack of
quorum. Since we have appointed Mr. Koss1er to that
Board, we no longer have any alternates.
We need a total of nine good people to serve on these
Boards as regular members or alternates.
~~
(8171281-0041/7301 N. E. LOOP 820 IP. O. BOX 186091 NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
12,~
'--
Decadion Partnership
3817 West Freeway
Suite 220
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
July 15, 1983
Rodger N. Line
Ci ty ~1anager
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Mr. Line:
We will begin construction on Castle Winds Apartments on Rufe
Snow Drive next week. In order to develop what we believe will
be a more attractive complex, we would like to request a variance
for the parking requirement 9f 2.5 parking spaces per unit tQ.
2.0 parking spaces. This would r~sult in a requirement of 312
spaces rather than 390.
'--
We believe that the 312 spaces will be more than adequate and
that the increased landscaping area will be of more benefit
to the surrounding neighborhood than unneccessary parking lot.
In the interest of time, we would request that this be placed
on the City Council's agenda for consideration at their July
25 meeting.
We will appreciate your efforts in this regard.
Sincerely,
!£
Daryl R Barrett
Decadi n Partnership
(formerly BWBM Partnership)
DB/sb
......
. .
¡QtJ
~
City of ~orth WcWand Hills
'--
~tar of the ~etroplex
TO: City Council Members
REF: PWM-0034-83
FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works
DATE: July 20, 1983
SUBJECT: Cost Recovery Fees for Water and Sewer Facilities
I recently reviewed some material relating to cities in
Texas adopting cost recovery programs to recover fees
spent for oversizing water and sewer mains and drainage
facilities. Some of the cities even passed programs
whereby a builder would pay the city a fee of $2,000
to take care of major work that had been done to serve
in their subdivision or major work in the future.
After reviewing these materials I got to thinking about
the situation in North Rich1and Hills and I remembered·
that in all cases we have required the developers and
the builders to pay the~r share of the water and sewer
system either by paying the city pro rata shares or
building the system into their subdivision.
(
In addition to this we have charged a tap fee. This
tap fee was based on the size of the meter that the
customer desires to have. For instance a 3/4" tap
costs $100 for water and $50 for sewer, a total of $150.
A 1" tap costs $150 for water and $50 for sewer, a total
of $200, and so on up the line until we reach a 2"
meter which costs $450 for water and $50 for sewer, for
a total of $500. It becomes obvious that in a single
family subdivision we collect about $15.000 for a
100 lot subdivision. This is based on a 3/4" tap,
This single tap also applies to two-family subdivisions
and we collect accordingly.
In the case of multi-family subdivisions they generally
use 1~" and 2" meters to serve the 100 or so apartments.
In the case of multi-family we collect $450 for a 2"
tap plus $50 for a sewer tap. a total of $500.
This system hardly seems fair to me and I would make the
following recommendation to amend our ordinance to require
that apar,tment buildings pay a fee based on the number of
units. This fee would be called the tap fee the same as
',--
(8171281-0041/7301 N. E.lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118
...
Page 2
Memo
July 20, 1983
---.-
any other tap fee and I would recommend $135 per apartment
unit. This is based on the fact that most single family
fees total $150 but in the case of apartments since they
run an occupancy rate of 90 to 99% this would be allowing
them a 10% credit. Some would argue that apartments
do not receive as much service as an independent homeowner
but I do not believe this to be true because an individual
homeowner and people that reside in single family homes
tend to take care of their property and also not abuse
the water and sewer system.
You will find in the case of apartment dwellers that all
types of objects are put into the sewer system and more
service is given to their sewer system. They also have
better water service and fire protection than the single
family residences because they have more of the city's
water mains lying close to where they live.
If this sounds like a reasonable plan or if you have
any comments concerning this, I would appreciate the
input and we could also prepare an ordinance if the
Council is agreeable to "a program like this.
'-
~-~
Gene Riddle
'-
City of ~orth WcWand Hills
?-s-
'---
Star of the ~etroplex
OFFICE OF
CITY MANAGiR
July 21, 1983
Memo to:
Honorable Mayor Dick Faram
Members of the City Council
From:
Rodger N. Line
City Manager
Subject:
Coin Operated Amusement Machines Ordinance
Several weeks ago Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey suggested that the Staff study our
Coin Operated Amusement Machines Ordinance to determine if it fairly and
equitably covers businesses engaging in this operation. Attached is a
"- summary prepared by Police Chief McGlasson, giving the results of the Police
Department study. Also attached is a listing of businesses which have coin
operated amusement machines.
City Council direction is requested.
'--
(817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. LOOP 820 1 P. O. BOX 186091 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS 76118
/'
C
--'-.-
_. .-
(
te.~
~,..<i('
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
COIN OPERATED AMUSEMENT MACHINES,
ORDINANCE
'--
I
\,
C·
----
BACKGROUND
--In March 1977 the North Richland Hills City Council passed a comprehensive
City Ordinance (#658) regulating the operation of pool, billiard, recreation
or amusement centers. This ordinance defined what was to be covered, the
distance each establishment would be from a church, school or residence,
visibility into the establishment, partitions, hours of operation, admittance
of minors, gambling and use of liquor and the procedure to .secure such a
license. The expiration date for all license was set as December 31 with a
fee of $25.00 to operate such an establishment and a fee of $7.50 per table or
machine located in that establishment. Places of business with three (3) or
less machines were exempted from these fees.
In May 1981 the initial ordinance was ammended (#895) to grant an additional
exemption. If the establishment in which the games were located derived '60%
of its revenue from the sale of food no provision of the ordinance applied to
that firm.
CURRENT COVERAGE
The police department has determined from the City Secretary's records that
only five (5) establishments in North Rich1and Hills currently are governed by
our statute. These five businesses have, as of 1 June 1983, 85 machines and
paid $792.50 in permits and fees;, during calendar year 1982. A complete
listing of all machines and their location is contained in Appendix "A".
~\- CURRENT EXEMPTIONS
'--':
Section "I" of Ordinance #658 exempts those establishments with three (3) or
less machines from obtaining a permit. There are currently twenty two (22)
establishments exempt under this provision. These 22 businesses have a total
of forty eight (48) coin-operated amusement games (see Appendix "A").
Section XX-a (Ordinance #895) provides an exemption for a place of business
"is that of a restaurant where at least sixty percent of the total revenue is
from food sales". There are currently thirteen (13) businesses that are
exempt and have three or more games. These establishments have one hundred
twenty three (123) games that would have been covered by this ordinance were
this exemption not operative.
One firm (Richland Cinema) has four (4) machines and does not have a
video-game permit. This firm is apparently unaware of the requirement that
they purchase a permit.
If all machines currently exempted from coverage were placed under Ordinance
#658 the number of covered machines would be raised by 148-from the current 85
to 233, (this includes the four (4) machines, currently not registered that
should be covered under our ordinance).
RECOMMENDATION
'---
The current revenue of $792.50 could be increased to a projected $2,577.50 (a
net gain of $1,785.00) if Ordinance #658 was ammended to remove the "3 game
exemptj.on" and Ordinance /1895 were rescinded to remove the "60% food income"
exemption. Adoption. of the attached ordinance, designed to totally replace
(-
\.
'--
(~
'~-""
'--
the existing ordinance, and the ammendments, would result in a g~in of
$1,980.00 not covered under the existing ordinance that would be covered by
the proposed ordinance. This partially as a result of the increase in fees
and partially as a result of extending the ordinance to 'all such games in our
jurisdiction.
If the City Council chooses to adopt the totally revamped ordinance we
recommend that the "Change-over" date be set as January 1,1984 so that we may
advise our existing operators that they must comply by that date.
i
~
APPENDIX A
r:. ..
",-0
BUSINESS NAME & ADDRESS
- Jack-in-the Box, 6501 Grapevine Hwy.
Rich1and Cinema, 6385 Grapevine Hwy.
Rich1and Bowl, 6601 Grapevine Hwy.
Unky Finks, Grapevine Hwy.
International House of Pancakes
11 MACHINES
2
4
14
9
1
3
21
29
2
2
3
3
3
3
12
3
3
6
2
3
2
79
7
2
1
2
1
3
4
2
1
1
,~ -
(\-
7-11, 4100 Rufe Snow
Zap Food & Games, 5212 Rufe Snow
Video Games, 5241 Rufe Snow
Stop & Go, 6250 Rufe Snow
Quik Wash, 6700 b1k. Watauga Rd.
7-11, 6644 Rufe Snow
Antonio's Pizza, 6312 Rufe Snow
Quickway, 6600 Davis Blvd.
7-11, 5941 Davis Blvd.
Video Games, 7810 College Cir.
Pronto Foods, 5601 Davis Blvd.
Stop & Go, 5200 Davis Blvd.
Channel Cat, 5249 Davis Blvd.
Free Dry Laundry, 5239 Davis Blvd.
7-11, 5050 Davis Blvd.
Takit, 8100 blk. Grapevine Hwy.
Show Biz, 7935 Grapevine Hwy.
Mama's Pizza, 7925 Grapevine Hwy.
Pizza Hut, 7901 Grapevine Hwy.
Market Basket, 7823 Grapevine Hwy.
Safeway, 7800 Grapevine Hwy.
Kettle Restaurant, Bedford Eu1ess Rd.
Daniels, Bedford Eu1ess Rd.
Bennigans, Bedford Eu1ess Rd.
Jubilation, Bedford Eu1ess Rd.
Dairy Queen, Davis Blvd.
Haystack Apts., 8500 Harwood Rd.
PERMIT
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
no
no
EXEMPT
yes
yes
yes
yes
EXPIRE
12-31-83
12-31-83
12-31-83
12-31-83
12-31-83
TOTAL
233 machines
(
-----
1
'~
City of J(8rth Richland Hills, Texas
,
-~1~cc-
Ø1\i¡,,,-
'¡L
Rodger Line
City Manager
TO:
DATE:
July 21. 1983
FROM: Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Platting & Zoning Cases for City Council July 25. 1983
PS 83-51
APPROVED
PS 83-55
APPROVED
PS 83-58
APPROVED
"- PS 83-59
APPROVED
PZ 83-42
APPROVED
(15 were contacted)
Request of Bob Hall for Short Form
Platting of Lot 8. Block 1. Henry
Addition.
Request of Charles Owen Company for
replat of Lots 10AR thru 12AR. Block
30. College Hill Addition.
Request of Chasewood Construction
Company for final plat of Lot 1.
Block 12. Snow Heights North Addition.
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lots 2R-1 & 2R-2. Block
6. Snow Heights North Addition.
Request of Doyne S. Byrd to rezone Lot
3R, Block 23. Clearview Addition. from
its present classification of Local
Retail to a proposed classification of
Commercial-Specific Use-Sale of Used
Autos. This property is located on
the north side of Grapevine Highway at
Maplewood Drive.
PZ 83-44
APPROVED
(12 were contacted)
Request of Burk Collins Investments to
rezone a portion of Tract 13. J. H.
Barlough Survey. Abstract 130. from
its present classification of Local
Retail to a proposed classification of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings. This
property is located on the south side
of Chapman Road and approximately 500
feet west of Smithfield Road.
'>~
(817) 281.()()41n301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS.TX 76118
To see Maps with Agenda:
Please contact City
Secretary's Office /
Municipal Records
\,::^<i¡;-~
c.:
,.<,."
ÐA~. :
/'
July 21, 1983
?~~
PS 83-51 . Sbortr~.·p'latting of Lot 8. Block t..J1~ry Ad~ition
DIP ARTKENT: P1a~inJ', aUct ,·ZóatDa·
BACKGROUND: This \prder;tY~.:JOç..t~ .on t~e west s1de_1Mt'Q' ¡Jrive and sout:h of "-
G1enview Drive.
"
There is ari' exiatÛJI' ø~:~ 99 ~t\~' ~t~~erty.
The correctio.. bav, þ~ ,~.·>'4.~Udf~. acid", additm~t_8..u~pt:~'(iAqp.AstM b,. 'l'F.~cn
The Planning ,UlG
subjec.t to tbe
Engineer's c.OIDIIct4with tbe.œ~tton of. item #3 resuu:d.~"tïtraad' sewer wo rata.
- --
L
- "
·There is existtQawat-er....,... ð~- tll1..'roDèrty. p~.... ,,'^ m.~ frðm BAne Ridd1f!'!
dated July· 18. 198~··~.Vd_'Jt.umt of - wa.~er ~nd :':M1~ 'J:'Q...rat4 ~~rles in t:he Aftlnnnt"
of $ 800.00.
CITY œUNCIL Ac;rtOB aJqJtI.II):; ~DJ)~oval or denial of "¡.~. '
BUDGETED ITEM: .
YES
10
¡,
ACCOUNT NUMBER: NtA
'" . ,-, . A~(}~
--------------:...------...,. ,_....._---------_..~{/!:.----------------------
~ . \.- .
\
\....-.
,
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
c
~
2.
PS 83-51
PS 83-51
APPROVED
'---
3.
PS 83-53
PS 83-53
APPROVED
4.
.........
c
Request of Bob Hall for Short Form
Plat of Lot 8, Block 1, Henry
Addition.
Jackey Fluitt with Stembridge
Engineers 'came forward to represent
Mr. Hall. He stated they had received
the City Engineer's letter and take no
exception to it, but would like to ask
one question in regard to the pro rata
for the 6 inch water and 6 inch sewer
lines. Mr. Fluitt said there are
existing water and sewer and he
believes it is the council's policy
that if there are existing water and
sewer, no pro rata is required.
Mr. Bronstad said that is correct,
there would be no charge.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 83-51 subject to the Engineer's
comments with the exception of item
#3, the second #3. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion
carried 5-0.
Request of U-Tex Development Compan
for preliminary plat of Lot 1, ck
5, Industrial Park Addition.
Mr. Fluitt came forwa
U-Tex Development e said they have
noproble~s wi the Engineer's
comments a the corrections' will be
made pro to going to council.
made the motion to approve
subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
Request of U-Tex Development Company
for preliminary plat of Lots 1-3,
Block 6, Industrial Park Addition.
Mr. Fluitt came forward to represent .
U-Tex Development. He said they take
no exception to any of the City
Engineer's comments.
City of ~orth WcWand Hills
Star of the ~etroplex
TO: ~CityCQunc.iL Members
REF: PWM-0033-83
FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works
DATE: July 18, 1983
SUBJECT: Lot 8, Block 1, Henry Addition
The engineer's letter on this matter stated that the
developer should pay a pro rata share for the existing
water and sewer services. As I understand it the developer's
engineer stated that it has been Council policy in the past
not to require pro rata and in these instances I do not know
where he gets this information and I disagree with it.
'-
This developer should be required to pay his pro rata of
water and sewer lines and I would like to point out that
the property immediately to th~ soúth of this property just
recently paid their pro ~ata for the water and sewer lines.
I believe that Mr. Stembridge was the engineer for that
pr;ClS~
(8171281-0041/7301 N. E. LOOP 820 1 P. O. BOX 186091 NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
•
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
•
- Consulting Engineers - - -
June 21 , 1983
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills , Texas 76118
Re : PS 83-51, Short Form Plat,
Lot 8 , Block 1 , Henry
Addition
We have received Knowlton-English-Flowers review comments on
the above referenced tract and we offer the following comments :
Item 1 . - City Staff function - - -
Item 2. - The developer will agree to pay his pro rata
share. of future curb and gutter and drainage
- _ improvements on Scruggs Drive. - -
Item 3 . - The above referenced property has existing water
meter and sewer service. It has been council
policy in the past not to require pro ratas in
these instances .
Item 4.-- The building set back line of 25 feet will be
added to the plat. -
If there are any questions regarding this matter please do not
hesitate to call .
De`Jbe
De e__ t r R. Stembridge mbridge P .E.
cc : Mr. Roger N. Line , City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle , _Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
w„, ,„„ ,,.,
~ .
t
(-,
"-
(
....,-
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
June 15, 1983
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-904, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
HENRY ADDITION, LOT 8, BLOCK 1,
SHORT FORM PLAT, PS 83-51, GRID 148
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1. Utility companies should be consulted regarding any additional easements
which may be required to serve this property.
2. The developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of future
curb and gutter, paving and s-tonn drainage improvements on Scruggs
Drive in accordance with the City's assessment policy based on a front
'- footage length of 100 feet.
3. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of future-
curb and gutter, paving and stonn drainage improvements on Scruggs Drive
in accordance with the City's assessment policy based on a front footage
of 100 feet.
3. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the existing
6-inch sewer line and proposed 6-inch water line in Scruggs Drive. We
would estimate a combined pro rata of $8.00 per linear foot for the water
and sewer lines for a total length of 100 feet.
4. A building set back line of 25 feet should be shown on the plat along
Scruggs Drive.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
~,~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
TESCO DATE: ~ILA 0 r) "q 8,")
'--
CITY DATE: June 3, 1,983
~, .,.(
. ,
'.
..
/ : "
. '
-}
f#
, , .
-
(
.,
~'r~
c
..; .
. .
.:.v9
. .
. .. ..
~. : .'
. ,
Hr. R. E. Wenmeyer
JESCO Fegion Engr. Mgr.·.', ,
p.a~ Box 970,
Fort Wpttht TX 76101 "
~ . .
.
. .
.'. .
, .
..
"
, "
:;. ' ,.
. '.
RE:
Ci ty Fi i e Reference Ñinnber ',", PS 83-51
".' HEmry /..'. '.;. . Addition,' Siock 1 "
. ,
.
. Lot··'· '8
Address or location west side of'ScruQQs Drive. north of Cross Street, ..:.
and sooth of Glenview
Attached is a print of th~ above-named subdìvision for review
of the proposed, layout in terms of the:requirements of you~.'
office. Pleas~ return your comments to Wanda Calver.t; ~lahnìñg &
Zoning Coördinator ~ on one '(1) copy of this form no lat~r tha:,n
June 13-, 1983
. '
. ." .:..
.:.
Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office.
Layout 'is satisfactory subject to additional informatton or
minor corrections being shown on ãttached plat. (See Co~ents)
o Layout requires major revision before',proper evaluation can
be made. (See Comments)
o
00
COMMENTS:
5IGNATURE:~,.__ 1;- l< , M. ,,"-' '-" -
'-
SIGNATURE:
~dP-C~
DATE:
Julv 21. 1983
"'-
1:
, .
L SUBJECT~ PS 83-55 'I.eplat of Lots lOAR thru 12AR, Bloç}t:$Q.,:COl1ege HÚl Addition.
DEPARTMENT: Plà~n~ ,aM tsmi~
BACKGROUND: at the sou tbwes~ ~Qf9.~' Qf Smit.hf leId Road AM
Cardinal Court.
This repl'at was need. tÇt ~,**1 ipe ,some lqt IPtel@ ipr ~1:Je,. ~ypln~&~
All correction. bave'be.aade.
"
The P1anninR and Zon1n1lt è.t.4.J:.Ç9JmD.'eð' apprCWJ.l of't'MfJr ,rApht' Itn1'\j",rt' t'n f''he
EnR ineer 's c~ents.
L
J
CITY CC?UNC1L' A~ION UQUllUm: ' ' AJ/(>t'oval or. den~l ~f rt~l~~.
BUDGETED l'lmh '
YES)
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
_________________..__________________________~~-c.~-------.-
, . .
L
Page 5
p & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
c
c
'---
PS 83-54
APPROVED
Mr. Wood mad 0 approve
subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the mótion carried 5-0.
5.
PS 83-55
Request of Charles Owen Company for
rep1at of Lots 10AR thru 12AR, Block
30, College Hill Addition.
Chuck Owen came forward. He stated
this replat is needed for the
realignment of some lot lines.
Chairman Tucker stated since this is a
replat in duplex zoning, according to
State Law, there must .be a Public
Hearing. He opened the Public -Hearing
and called for those wishing to speak
in favor of this request to please ,
come forward.
"-.-
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman called for those wishing
to speak in opposition to this request
! to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
PS 83-55
APPROVED
Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve
PS 83-55 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
6.
PS 83-56
Request of John W.
preliminary replat
Estates.
',--
John Barfield - forward. He stated
~-
this property for 10, 12,
or oW 'é-ars. Mr. Barfield said he
~tted the property in the 1970's to
~ .... show the realignment of Shady Grove
~,.. Road so the telephone company could
~o.'·~ have an easement. Mr. Barfield said.
~ he received his zoning approval in
~' , . June, 1980, but due to several reasons
J beyond his control, he was not able
to develop the property at that time.
He said #1 being no water, but it
c.'
c
,>
SURTEX. INC.
REGISTEREC PUBLIC SURVEYORS
3001 RACE STREET
P. O. BOX 7021
FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76111
R. A. HEFFINGTON
PHONE 834.7481.---..,
June 23, 1983
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills. Texas 76118
Re: 3-804t City of North Richland Hil~s,
COLLEGE HILLS ADDN., LOTS 10AR-12AR,
BLOCK 30t PS 83-55t REPLAT, GRID 87
'--
In regard to the comments supplied to you concerning the proposed replat:
1. To our understandingt we were advising the Utility companies of the
proposed replat when we supplied you with the required number of prints of the
replat.
2't 3. and 4., shall be conformed to on delivery of this letter.
Thank you for informing us of these comments.
Si~~_~_
David Hare, Surtex, Inc.
'-
o
I
('
.
~
KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS; Fort Worth-Dallas
June 15, 1983
Planning & Zoning Commission
Ci ty of North Richland Hill s
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
1.
2.
'-- 3.
4.
"
'----
Re: 3-804, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
COLLEGE HILL ADDN., LOTS 10AR-12AR,
BLOCK 30, PS 83-55, REPLAT, GRID 87
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
Utility companies should be advised of the proposed replat.
The existing zoning of the subdivision should be noted on the plat.
All property corner monumentation located on the ground should be noted
on the plat.
The area of the proposed replat should be noted on the plat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
~~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l jc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BL.DG,· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
-.!....
9
DATI:
JUly 21, :J.983
:
I :
'-- SUBJECT ~
J
-'
;
L
v
,-
'Engineer's
Pl~~";~~~_,
^:':-',,"-'-," - :,<:-',-::,< ,::~:,:',:":~:~.;-':-", ':_"'\:;::~":":' ':;,::: ;>-':\ :)" <~ '<--", ,: --" : -~, - :,", ':-": ':":', ;,::-
Th~.t~~~Jr'éì9:~.£t4 .000:~h~ nortb "jl~~;letf:hql!lt: T.nnp R'O san" iA -
DEPAl.nŒ1IT:
BACICGROtnm :
.:..
. R.eynold s Road.'
t'
Thev have atE,.,
1,~r/i' ftA~ 1""~ It
¡)lat· ~b' ect to tha
L
CITY CÓUNCIL "~IOH UQù11tBÐ~
,.
BUDGET:£D ITEM:
YIS
ACCOUNT NtJMBER:
H/ .· , .
- , . ' /1-'r:. I í) 1\ .
, ,'~" ...~~~
-----~---~-------~-~,--~--..~~~~----~~~--~-~~~~~~~~~----------~------------
Page 7
P & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
c
~
l,
Chairman Tucker said you_ could
really call this a replat, it
previously only been a street
dedication. He said there w e no
notices sent out and the ould be no
need for a Public Hear' g.
PS 83-56
APPROVED
Mr. Hannon made ~ motion to approve
PS 83-56 sub' to the Engineer's
comments w' the exception of item
#6, se nå, subject to the renaming of
Oak ge Drive and Sierra Drive, and
t xd, subject to designating
ápproximately 12-15 acres (Blocks 6 &
7) for a future school site. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and
the motion carried 5-0.
'--
Mr. Long asked if the school decided
it wanted another location instead of
Blocks 6 and 7, would this motion just
made stop this.
Chairman Tucker stated it would not.
He said, at the time of final plat
approval, if the school changes any,
just bring this Board a letter from
the school.
7.
PS 83-58
,Request of Chasewood Construction
Company for final plat of Lot 1, Block
12, Snow Heights North Addition.
Mr. Mac McWilliams with J. R.Davis
and Associates came forward to
represent Chasewood Construction
Company. He stated they had received
the City Engineer's comments and have
complied with them.
PS 83-58
APPROVED
Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve
PS 83-58 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
-~.ø:::r...&'~~~':~~a~~.~r~":'.ÞC'7:r'~""''!!o'!'.r~A~-1e-'\-_'"T'%'''''''''''''''~~~_,:t.'.'' ¥~Jo.a.''~~'''~
8,
PS 83-59
Request of Burk Collins Inves
for replat of Lots _ R-2,
Block 6, ~ ~g ts North Addition,'
'--
came forward. He stated
he recently received a zoning change
to Commercial on this property and he
plans to build a business park.
~-_ 4'.1"-4.. --~ ..-.-.t A
'--
'---
'~
..
JACK R. 6AVIS
\ & associates, inc.
consulting civil engineers & surveyors
c
..
Jack R, Davis, P,E.
Richard Carson, Jr., P.E.
John R, Piburn, Jr., R.P.S,
June 22, 1983
Ms. Wanda Calvert
City of North Richland Hills
Planning & Zoning Department
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: fS 83-42 P S i~ - õ1
Final Plat
Lot 1, Block 12
Snow Heights North Addition
Dear Ms. Calvert:
I have reviewed the recommendations of the letter dated June 16, 1983,
from Knowlton-English-F1owers, Inc. regarding this plat and have the
following comments:
1. TheOwner's acknowledgement and dedication, state and notary
certification will be fully executed before approval of the
plat.
2. The Surveyor's seal of registration and signature will be
affixed to the plat before approval.
3. The Engineer's seal of registration and certification will
be affixed to all construction drawings before approval.
4. Please refer to my letter dated May 24, 1983, for items 2'
and 3. TESCO has approved construction of the proposed
water main across their right-of-way and an easement and
right-of-way has been filed with the County. The Texas
Highway Department has approved construction of the 12
inch water main in their right-of-way and a permit is cur-
rently being secured.
5. The 6 inch water main along west property line has been
changed to an 8 inch main and extended to I.H. 820.
A Subsidiary of Brockette . Davis. Drake, Inc.
2902 Carlisle Street· Dallas, Texas 75204. (214) 651-0801
(:-
Ms. Wanda Calvert
June 22, 1983
Page 2,
C-,
- ,
'---
6. Two additional 8 inch valves were added at the intersection
of the central water line and the east side water line.
7. The zoning of the property was added to the plat.
Should you have any questions, please call our office.
Yours very truly,
/lll~ /J1~Iu¡¿/~
Mac McWilliams, P.E:
Project Engineer
MM/ke
--
'--
'--
;;'¡-,
'--
c
c
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth-Dallas
June 16, 1983
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION, LOT 1,
BLOCK 12, PS 83-58, FINAL PLANS,
GRID 112, 121
---
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer t
following comments:
1. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of the plat.
2. The Surveyor's Seal of Registration and Signature should be affixed
to the plat before approval.
3. The Engineer's Seal of Registration and Certification should be
affixed to all construction drawings before approval.
4. We would refer you to Comments No.2, 3, 6 and 8 of our review
letter, dated May 17, 1983, for PS 83-42.
5. We would request that the proposed 6-inch water line located along
the west side of this development be increased to an 8-inch diameter
and extended southweard and tied into the proposed 12-inch line in
I.H. 820 to provide better looping and distribution.
6. Two additional 8-inch gate valves should be provided at the inter-
section of the central water line and the east side water line.
.
7. The current zoning for this development should be noted on the plat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this sbudivision,
please not hesitate to call.
~
RWA:mh
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
sso FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
J
'--
'--
'-.-
.-
-j
JACK' R. &~,~VIS
& associates~ inc. .
consulting civil engineers & surveyors
e-
Jack R. Davis. P.E.
Richard Carson. Jr.. P.E,
John R. Piburn. Jr.. R.P.S-.
May 24, 1983
Ms. Wanda Calvert
City of North Ric~land Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Preliminary Plat of Lot 1 Block 12
Snow Heights Addition
P$-83-42
Dear Ms. Calvert:
I have reviewed the recommendations from Knowlton-Engl;sh-Flowers and have
the following comments regarding their letter dated May 17. 198J:
1. Ownerships of all contiguous properties will be shown on the
final plat.
2. Engineering plans are currently being drafted by Delbert
Stembridge to extend the storm sewer from Reynolds Road to
the east property line of our tract. We will then extend
the storm sewer to our west property line to pick up run-off
from the west. We will coordinate our planwork with Mr.
Stembridge for the construction of this storm sewer.
3. Utility companies will be contacted and consulted prior to
filing of the plat to add any additional easements they may
require. Tesco has forwarded a print showing a 5 foot ease-
ment for electric distribution facilities around the perimeter
of the property which we will add to the plat.
4. The proposed 15 foot utility easement will be changed to a
15 foot water line easement.
5. A note will be -added to the final plat which states that the
sanitary sewer system within the platted area will be pri-
vately owned and maintained.
/
6. A permit will be obtained from the State Highway Department
for the construction of the proposed 12 inch water main along
I.H. 820.
A Sub~idlary of Brockene . Davis. Drake. Inc,
2902 CarlisleStreet . Dallas. Texas 7S20-t. (214) 6S 1-0801
-.
Ms. Wanda Calvert
May 24. 1983
Page 2.
,..-
i.(
C(.
"--
7. The water main through the site will be an 8 inch line.
However, fire hydrant leads will be six inch. All water
service will be tapped from the 8 inch main.
8. We will obtain permission from Tesco for the construction
of the 8 inch main across their right-of-way.
-
9. A bearing will be added along I.H. 820 to locate the center
of curvature.
10. All plans and specifications will conform to the City of
North Richland Hills.
If you have any questions, please call my office.
Sincerely,
7Jl~ /r1 [. w;¿/.:;..~
Mac McWilliams, P.E.
Project Engineer
'- MM/ ke
'--
-.
'----
c(
o
"-
~
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS~ INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
1'1ay 17, 1983
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, .
SNOW HEIGHTS ADDN., LOT 1, BLOCK 12,
NO. PS 83-42, PRELIMINARY PLAT, GRID 112, 121
',,-,
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the followi'ng c,001ments:
1. The ownership of all contiguous property should be noted on the plat.
2. The Developer should be required to obtain the proposed off-site
30-foot wide drainage easement from the adjacent property owner as
required to discharge concentrated stormwater eastward from'the
proposed underground storm drain. Otherwise, a letter should be
obtained from the adjacent property owner confirming his agreement
to accept concentrated stormwater discharge on his property. Also,-
a commitment should be obtained from the adjacent property owner
to extend the proposed underground storm drain across his property
. to Lewis Drive at such time that his property is developed.
3. Utility companies should be consulted regarding any additional
easements which may be required to serve this property. .
4. The proposed IS-foot utility easement provided for the water main
which will serve this property should be changed to illS-foot Water
line Easement" on the util ity layout sheet.
5. A note should be provided on the plat which states that the sanitary
sewer system within the platted area is privately owned and maintained.
6. A permit from the State Highway Department should be obtained for
construction of the proposed 12-inch water main extension in the
I.H. 820 right-of-way.
'-
7. ,We would recommend that the proposed 6-inch water main locate~ in
this development be increased to an 8-inch size.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.' BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021' 817/283·621" METR0/267.3367
-.
.'
,-
Il.-_
"l
r
V
\,
Page 2, Planning & Zoning Commission, May 17, 1983
8. Pennission should be obtained from TESCa for construction of the
proposed water line across their right-of-way.
9. A beari ng to the center of cu rva ture of the north 1 ine of I. H. 820
at the southeast or southwest corner of Block 12 should be shown
on the plat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of these plans.
please do not hesitate to call.
""-
~~--
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle. Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
'---
.......
/ð
DATE; July 21,/1983,
-'
& 21.-2. Block. '~_~J Îi,ht8 Nor~'b Add'itWn
",-. SUBJECT; PS 93-05'
This
"
DEPAJ.TMINT-:
BACKGROUND: Thi
proposed KHmer D~~._;.:, '
_ business park.
There was on!
Tbe
L
CITY COUNCIL A~toa UQÐf'JI); .4\i'Drovà.l 9r de,pia1 of
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOtfNTNUMBElt:
'. " -
_.._--....--....._-_..._,...._.........__.......-..................'~~...-......,.~.....-.....-~~~_:~
r"".
Page 7
P & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
C~.
----
PS 83-56
APPROVED
"-
7.
PS 83-58
C
\
-,
Chairman Tucker said you_ could not
really call this a replat, it had
previously only been a street
dedication. He said there were
notices sent out' and there woul no
need for a Public Hearing.
Mr. Hannon made the motio
PS 83-56 subject to the ngineer's
comments with the exc tion of item
#6, second, subject 0 the renaming of
Oak Ridge Drive /Sierra Drive, and
third, subject designating
approximately -15 acres (Blocks 6 &
7) for a fut, e school site. This
motion was econded by Mr. Wood and
the moti carried 5-0.
ng asked if the school decided
it anted another location instead of
,_ 'ocks 6 and 7, would this motion just
, ade stop this.
Chairman Tucker stated it would not.
He said, at the time of final plat
approval, if the school changes any,
just bring this Board a letter from
the school.
Request of Chasewood Construction
Company for final plat of Lot 1, Block
12, Snow Heights North Addition.
Mr. Mac McWilliams with J. R. Davis
and Associates came forward -to
represent Chasewood Construction
Company. He stated they had received
/, the City Engineer's comments and have
complied with them.
// PS 83-58 Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve
APPROVED PS 83-58 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
..;~~~ ...._~~~~'1"...:;.:'o.T~ _,..,._~~.-.t;f""'~~_c...~rf.Cì....~~~~'!:;.lt_·.::=I~-<k" ~"'!'-.: _.~_M,.A._~"'CW;~_____~_"""~,s- o~'''''--''___
8. PS 83-59 Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lots 2R-l and 2R-2,
Block 6, Snow Heights North Addition:
',,---
Mr. Collins came forward. He stated
he recently received a zoning change
to Commercial on this property and he
plans to build a business park.
'-1
Page 8
p & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
c_
,r-'
l.-
I
'--
--
Mr. _Collins stated he has no problems
with the City Engineer's comments.
PS 83-59
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 83-59 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
9.
PZ 83-42
Request of Doyne S. Byrd to rezone Lo
3R, Block 23, C1earview Addition, fr
its present classification of Loca
Retail to a proposed classificat' n of
Commercial-Specific Use-Sale 0 sed
Autos. This property is loc ed on
the north side of Grapevin ighway at
Maplewood Drive.
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called ~ those wishing
to speak in fav~~~ this request to
please come fo~~d.
Mrs. Myrtis }h{d came forward. She
said they ¡rre the owners of this
propertypilich is not being used.
. Mrs. ..BJ;t said they had the " Hire a
Heap~ent cars they need to sell so
th;l'wouldlike to rezone this
p~operty for a used car lot. She said
~nis lot would be only for the display
~¡.f of cars, they would use their office
~¿ in the shop to sell them.
./
/'/
/
f,f'
,<-"
./
,.t'o
...
r
<-
¡(.
t·
f
-...
/fi'
þ'
/.
.¡I'
ft,'
#
,.
f'
("
Mrs. Byrd said they have been paying
taxes on this lot for a long time and
they would like to be able to use it.
'-
Mrs. Byrd said they do not rent the
cars anymore because the insurance was
so high. She said they park them in
back of the shop because there is so
much vandalism.
Mrs. Byrd said they promise there will
be no cars with flats and none with no
hoods on them. She said they do not
want that kind of ugly site in our
city.
Mr. Wood asked Mr. Bronstad if this
Specific Use would limit the use of
this lot.
=.:.t...___............._. ...._f"õ.__.~ ""'...._______...._.~__.
--,....._~,'. .,.-,...,... ~.--
,.
~-
I .
\..
(
\.,~..
~-
.
KNOWLTON-ENGliSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS j Fort Worth-Dallas
"- ..
June 16, 1983
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH, LOTS 2R-1 AND 2R-2,
BLOCK 6, PS 83-59, REPLAT, GRID 112
'-
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
L All utility companies should be notified of the proposed
replat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
~.~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA :mh
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.' BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021' 817/283-6211' METR0/267-3367
~: July 21, 1983
II
L SUBJECT:, PZ 83.../t2
DEPARTMENT: P1aft~1ø'Ñ~..
,~ , .
"', ','
t:t')('¡fl~("iA'-Sp~if'ic. Use-Sale nf
Block 23.
\ ' ,'- '
BAaGlWUND: This ~ø~~ti. :leeUer.f ,on '~he northtä., g( ,~åpfNi'OP' Hi.,¡pway at" MAP' AwnncLDr.
to be allowed to
: ._,- ., :, ' ,- ' ," -.,', 5:'-'(- , -, '., ,"
h$ve;14'or·1~ól~-Hi1te.lleap'·carB tbe~a."t~, 4:ts~se of.
" . :" .' ", " -.' .;,.
sell 4t,1.~9.,~tb~. lot., The cars ...;t"'O~~ 1978 models.
.~ . .- '
They wish
Mr. &' Mrs. ,Bnd
The Plaunin¡ &1111 -t9 ~ "_ÒIoI!I""a~ øf>_.';"~ rèque~t with the
-stipulation tbatfOf/t'he f~~t: ~2 ~tbs of operation,~ tbÍlf.á04el yeai be rio older than
1970 for the rental fieet there ,t. no auto will be no older
-.
than 3 years. ·this.... al~-Ovec! 1>1 ~ vote of ,3-2 with·M:&-.wøod æic1 M;'; Hannon voting against
L
. ~
CIn COUNCIL' Â~IOR uqò1UD:~~"QV.l 0' si,.~l qf ..~réCIUe.t.
BUDGETED ITEK:
---------------------""-_......_-""....__..._..._-----~~--~------
, N/A
-,'
ACCOUNT NmmD:
~
, I
Page 8
P & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
..-
I'
"'--
c
"'---- -
stated he_ - uproblems
neêr-' s comments.
PS 83-59
APPROVED
.' - r. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 83-59 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Doyne S. Byrd to rezone Lot
3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, from
its present classification of Local
Retail to a proposed classification of
Commercial-Specific Use-Sale of Used
Autos. This property is located on
the north side of Grapevine Highway at
Maplewood Drive.
9.
PZ 83-42
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
"-
Mrs. Myrtis Byrd came forward. She
said they are the owners of this
property which is not being used.
Mrs. Byrd said they had the" Hire a
Heap" rent cars they need to sell so
they would like to rezone this
property for a used car lot. She said
this lot would be only for the display
of cars, they would use their office
in the shop to sell them.
Mrs. Byrd said they have been paying
taxes on this lot for a long time and
they would like to be able to use it.
Mrs. Byrd said they do not rent the
cars anymore because the insurance was
so high. She said they park them in
back of the shop because there is so
much vandalism.
Mrs. Byrd said they promise there will
be no cars with flats and none with no
hoods on them. She said they do not
want that kind of ugly site in our
city.
Mr. Wood asked Mr. Bronstad if this
Specific Use would limit the use of
this lot.
, .. ~I
Page 9
P & Z Minutes
June 23. 1983
""-,,. .
--
'--
~
r
(-
i
\
Mr. Bronstad said if they have a
Specific Use zoning for the sale of
used cars. that is all it could be
used for.
Mrs. Byrd said it is not being used
for anything now.
Mr. Schwinger asked Mrs. Byrd if they
plan. to use the lot for a car lot from
now on or just until they sell their
Hire a Heap cars.
Mrs. Byrd said they plan to use it
from now on.
Mr. Hannon stated it is the coúncil's
policy to put a limit of the age; of
the cars to not more than two to three
years old. He asked Mrs. Byrd if they
would agree to that.
Mrs. Byrd said they could not because
their cars are older that that and
they need to get rid of them.
Chairman Tucker said Mrs. Byrd stated
they would be selling these cars out
of their office at Byrd Automotive.
but all sales would have to be on this
lot. not out of the shop because if is
not zoned for it.
Mrs. Byrd said they would do the
selling on this lot if they needed to.
Mr. Bowen asked how old their cars
were.
Mrs. Byrd said they were 1978 models.
Mr. Bowen asked if they plan to sell
later model cars also. He said
Belknap Street in Fort Worth has lots
and lots filled with old used cars and
he would not be in favor of having
that in our city. Mr. Bowen said he
felt they must have a stipulation of .
not more than two or three year old
cars after they get rid of the old
Hire a Heap cars.
Page 10
p & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
c~'-- -
)
"--
0\
'-.;..7
c
c
Mrs. Byrd said they would agree to
that.
Mr. Wood asked h9w many Hire a Heap
cars do they have.
Mrs. Byrd said they have 14 or 15.
Mr. Bowen asked if they were
completely out of the rental business. .
Mrs. Byrd said they were.
Chairman Tucker called for anyone
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Bowen said he did not see how she
could get rid of these old cars.
Chairman Tucker said with a Specific
Use, they can stipulate such things as
giving them 12-14 months to dispose of
these cårs and from then on limit the
sale to no older than 3-year models.
He said this would put a burden on the
city to see that the ordinance is
carried out.
Mr. Wood said he did not see how the
city could monitor than; they would
have to be going out there all the
time to see what year models they were
selling. He said he felt they should
either be allowed to sell all cars or
sell none, and he was in favor of the
latter.
Mr. Wood made the motion to deny
PZ 83-42.
This motion died for the lack of a
second.
Chairman Tucker said in order to get a
motion on the floor, he would make a
motion.
Page 11
P & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
r--
\
! r:-;"~,,- -
/,J'::;
PZ 83-42
APPROVED
',--
~,
! ---.~
'=...;;J'
10. PZ 83-43
WITHDRAWN
(\,
I
Chairman Tucker made the motion to
approve PZ 83-42 with the stipulation
that for the first 12 months of
operation, the model year be no -older
than 1970 for the purpose of selling
their rental fleet, there after no
auto will be no older than 3 years.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen.
Mr. Hannon asked for a clarification.
He asked if it was his intention to
have this 12 month grandfather clause
for the existing fleet only and during
that time they can not sell other
vehicles older than 3 model years,
being in this case, 1981, 1982, and
1983 model years?
Chairman Tucker said that was correct.
Mr. Wood asked if they would have to
clarify what cars they now have.
Chairman Tucker stated that would be
left up to the City Staff and City
Council.
The motion carried by a vote of 3-2
with Mr. Wood and Mr. Hannon voting
against.
Request of Rollin Vinall to rezone
Tract A9, J.C. McComas Survey,
Abstract 1040, from its pr t
classifications of ~ ulture and
IF-12 to a pr~~classification of
1F-12-1~...ðfîèFamily Dwellings. This
pr~ is located at the northeast
~rner of Meadow Road and the proposed
~-> Buck Street.
~ Mr. Vinall withdrew his zoning
request.
Request of Rollin Vinall for
preliminary plat of Lots 1-3, Block 5,
Hewitt Estates.
Mr. Vinall withdrew his preliminary
plat.
("
,J
\.
.
KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
.........
June 14, 1983
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820 .
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-42,
LR TO COM-SU-SALE OF USED AUTOS, GRID 124
--
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that
we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
!2.-cW--UJ. ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 617/263-6211. METRO/267-3367
i , ,,;•-- - ., ri: .•
•
C
�� RA?-rt ;;�l Ttrrt.r () M� ^ th N';'..7. ..1.
FoRT WORTH;• `fir'-�1Vr� �� a`-:'-'vsi :�:_ ,:P•1.',._.
•
•,
[/31 a• wo •
•
....-•002;7Z;41 l•
r.
a • t I•0.0 /r0.p• "�""- ."I t }
4 l:vi 1♦R /I9.p t• IN Q
Q bW . a ! ti
X • — J P h fA Pi ` O C^;e tlk
h 1 . ,�
•/.r/.d ' /73.5 s .1 c .� fa V �• ?t L — = u Q( V HIGHWAY 12/
i CO .. tTh ; u
. � , ?. } ;
u
I ii
r
Plat Showing.. h
'j
i.
- y -31, 2 2 3 «.
ii•
CL EA.^VIEW ADDITION
M acing a revision of •:
;, Tract A, Block 23,
il
Clearview Addition
an addition to the ;
d CF. ':(1rii'! :(ICiiL,l'ti+J :?T',j^ T_::{ city of North Rich- •'
�:� " . land Hills,
.it ') Tarrant•
---r-- •. i County, Texas. '
y , i".r+•'1'.t'.,• • .,/: ■•/• :n^�m –•- –1
1.
.salon -< `.. I
!)..C: •4r✓ C
I.
. This is to certify that we marked tho corners as shown above. the loco:on or i:.,p,�;vemcn.�
ore as shown, the easements and building linos are as they o
there are no visible encroachments except as shown.
y PpO°r on said mop of record and
I , D note _ / - ----L—w --- — i'
•t 'a` (�/�/� 2 7- 71 �i4 _`' r•.; registered °--" ��ON PINS •
•
;;r� 8 ed public surveyor no. 1326 X•X --.•__-- FZhCE
•
` a ••.------- LO:S D'ARC STAKES '
• .,,,:, 1�ZJ .;•` 6144 6 EAST C LKNA? >✓TFE:cT -T-E
G••• p '0� LiTisITY ONE
'-d•.�/s�src!':•'••l FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117 S-S E
i. C st;V•,� ^ SANfT+L2Y S.Wc,2
•
VOL 003 4Sf.. /'.)
I
l:;v
'---'
ORDINANCE NO. (0 t.f-r
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS,
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF NORTHRICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967,
AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 83-42 the following described property shall
be ~ezoned from Local Retail to Commercial-Specific Use-Sale of Used Autos
with the stipulation that for the first 12 months of operation, the model
year be no later than 1970 for the purpose of selling their rental fleet,
there after' no auto will be no older than 3 years.
BEING Lot 3R, Block 23, Clearview Addition, to the City of North Rich1and
Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-48, Page 173, Deed
Records, Tarrant Counyt, Texaš
---
This propery is located on the north side of Grapevine Highway at Maplewood
Dt:ive.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd DAY OF June, 1983.
Õf¥a C h~r
Chairman, lanning & Zoning Commission
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERY IN CASE
NO.PZ-83-42 IS HEREBY REZONED
THIS DAY OF
Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
'-
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
D&tl:
June 21, 1983
~
.'
\....--, SQ'BJICT :.
PZ 83-44 ~~ cr'$9U~Jt from ~al Retail ~ìJ~ptï,.' ~'[t:;J.~iÍ of Tra~t: 13,
.-
~stract 1312
11'"
DIPAJ.1'MINT :
Pl~1M"~"\"~m '.'
The~e were J.2 proáè~" ¡~tr~ 9~t~ted but no one .'DOkè,·_:,».S·1~1.og..' There were two
I: ' ' -' ",'" ,".~' '< '
on the. soutQ,
And ApprnYiMA~Þ1y
IACKG1lOUND :
of thisreou'est.
The Planning and ~~ ~..~ m:recOllRend~ a1)1?t~'¡' r#i:'~ijj., Jonin, reauest.
"_' ,"', - - '.' " ,- ,.,;, : ,"',,-',,', ',~ j' _' ,,' - 'i"... ,:j' '_', '_,. ~;';:" ->:' <:,"_- ," ,: '/
"
i(j !oI
~.
CITY COUNCIL A~IONuqut.~ 4N~ror,1 0'7' d~1Al
BUDGETED ITEM:
Ø9X
ACCOONT NUMJ£R:
" ~,-
-------------..,¡.....--~~--~---
, . ,'. '- -' , ", -, ',' " - -
" - ~
. ," -'-,', ,:-;
..____.._____........._....___~........f@I. t> ,n:T ~
L
Page 12 .
P & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
,.r: '''"--,'
12. PZ 83-44
'-
r
\
~}
'--
(-
-"'-
c
Request of Burk Collins Investments to
rezone a portion of Tract 13, J.H.
Bar10ugh Survey, Abstract 130, f;om
its present classification of Local
Retail to a proposed classification of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings. This
property is located on the south side
of Chapman Road and approximately 500
feet west of Smithfield Road.
Owen D. Long, Consulting Engineer,
came forward to represent Mr. Collins.
He said this tract has been zoned
different ways two or three times in
the past. Mr. Long stated Mr. Collins
acquired this property and is willing
to develop the whole tract and does
not wish to wait for the retail
development to come in, he wants to
make the whole tract a duplex complex.
He said the front part is presently
zoned Local Retail with the back
portion_for duplexes and he wishes to
change the Local Retail part to'dup1ex
zoning. -
Chairman Tucker opened the Public ,
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Loy Sturch, P.O. Box 80155,
Smithfield, Texas, came forward. He
said he lives at the end of West Main
Street. Mr. Sturch said he has talked
with the developer and it sounds like
it would be a good development. He
said he had seen some duplexes he has
built and they seem to be of good
quality. Mr. Sturch said he believes
he had rather have duplexes there than
Local Retail.
William Gideon, 7717 Chapman Road,
came forward. He stated he lives
north of this property. Mr. Gideon
said he felt it would be a blessing to
have duplexes across the street
instead of stores.
Page 13,
P & Z Minutes
June 23, 1983
r
{
""-
(
\-.;....
r
l
Mr. Gideon said he would like to ask a
question. He said all the water
coming from the north has to go
through this are~; he asked if
arrangements had been made to take
care of it.
'-
Chairman Tucker stated this case is a
zoning matter where they decide the
best use of the land, but in the next
case, PS 83-57, the platting of this
property, they will have to show that
they can take care of the drainage.
He said, if done right, it should help
the whole neighborhood.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no ODe wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
r>,
I _
\.../
PZ 83-44
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PZ 83-44. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 5-0.
13.
PS 83-57
Request of Burk Collins
for preliminary plat of
Addition.
Mr. Long came forw~,.
Collins. He st they had received
the City E?~~r'S comments and have
no obj ectå~n to them.
di"V
.,..;ÞvP"
, F Long said in regard to the man's
~p' question previously regarding the
~p drainage, there is an existing
,.¡/",¡.~þ drainage way to the north which is
ý;:::/ almost in line with the west property
..-;7' . line of our Central Avenue. He said
,v . .
.-,::P" how the water 1.S g01.ng to get across
..,-;'þ,T Chapman Road to their concrete lined
~-;.?ý'" channel, they do 'not know. Mr. Long
,>y said they do not 0'Wn the property to.
¿_'L>'þV the north or Chapman Road. He said
." they know there is a problem there.
_. ..,.,....___,~.._ '-" ........-.,.,... _..'-~~ ,.-~~ - - ~-v" ~~~-~'--'~~~~_~":;T':"":;;":';":;;;;::'¡:;';¡~...~-~~:.-~'5-~
If
'-, --
ORDINANCE NO. ¡o4-3
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS,
'SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING QRDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE/CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967,
AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-44 the following described property shall
be rezoned from Local Retail to 2F-9-Two Family Dwellings.
BEGINNING at a point 192 varas West and 188.0 feet North 1 degree 11
minutes East of the Southeast corner of the J.C. McComas Survey at a steel
'rod in the South R.O.W. line of Chapman Road;
~
THENCE Westerly along said South R.O.W. line of Chapman Road, as fol¡ows:
West 114.5 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, with a radius
of 229.37 feet;
Westerly around said curye, 198.39 feet to the end of said curve and
the beginning of a curve to the right, with a radius of 304.2 feet;
Westerly around said curve to the right, 261. 76 feet to the end of
said curve;
South 89 degrees 44 minutes West, 128.32 feet to a steel rod for
corner;
THENCE South 2 degrees 23 minutes West, 204.6 feet to a steel rod for
corner;
THENCE North 88 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds East, 40.0 feet to a corner;
THENCE South 1 degree 17 minutes West, 120.0 feet to a corner;
THENCE South 39 degrees 12 minutes West, 132.7 feet to a corner;
THENCE South 57 degrees 48 minutes East, 180.0 feet to a corner;
THENCE South 88 degrees 48 minutes East, 220.0 feet to a corner;
THENCE North 78 degrees 12 minutes East, 180.0 feet to a corner;
THENCE South 88 degrees 48 minutes East, 120.0 feet to a corner;
"'- THENCE North 1 degree 11 minutes East, 687.6 feet to the place of beginning
and containing 9.317 acres of land, more or less.
-r
bAD:
July 21 t 1983
~
/~
\
~
J
-- SUBJlCT ~
"-
PZ 83...15 .~~3;__~~ on zon:mg from IF-9-1SQØ,to 2F~9 aDd ~lt:L-FamUY-QuadB
. O1J.~.1r.l~~-=t.1á t" T.K. Mart:111·Survey. .....,&t.1055
",.'
.., .'
'.
\.....--
DIPABTMIR't :
..
P¡....~d )%9a~:
. - ," - - ",,", ,",
BACIGROtßm:
Th1a ~...~~'1~~~e4~~1rOX~t~'f ~f19'~_ ~t qf. qran, Road and 8Xt~s
. ~' , ", .
ea.tw~d. t~ ·aD' )rcø;..~'~tti .øg.f.~"fest of ~ec:111ct t~1 W·
, ,'-,,_', ~_ .-' , , '_,-._ - ,- . ,'_" ·t-: ~
Mr. Garrison 1rl.,.\ea t.o:'c..... t'be '01.\:1111 from staale f_:11Jjo 4.~1_.~ aDd ~s.
. '- '- - -',' ".' "-" ,.-' , \
r . .
. '.
. '...
There were 11 "Ol-a o1m".~,acted. There is ...1~-"itJ.cm. Thu.e_s a lot of
//. r' . .
·oi)J'Osit1on to tlh:te r~-est"1
. .
The pi&\Ultaa ~ Zoa~.~.stou denied tbe: request by . ..te of 5-0; .
11:'
.
-
,- I",
\.....
~
~
a-
CITY COUICn.· AcrxOB ØQOtJBÐ1' ....t".,. q,1' d~ia~ 9t.mi.J'...-es~.
BUDGBTID rn:H: . YES
ACCOUNT NOHBEll: NtA
_______..._______......___.'.'.'.. '"-__ ,..'w ~.J
'. " JIll .................¡...'..___..........,.....J~ 'ì
.................~~~..
._ 11'..... , _,17 __...................-________________
L¡
-1,
.~
.
Page 7
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
6.
PZ 83-15
--
@
!(!J<1. i
~
Request of William N. Garrison to
rezone several tracts in the T.K.
Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from
their present classification of
1F-9-1500-0ne Family Dwellings to
proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and
Mu1ti-Fami1y-Quads.
This property is located approximately
200 feet east of Crane Road and
extends eastward to approximately 200
-feet west of Precinct Line Road.
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. Garrison came forward. He stated
they are requesting a portion of their
land be rezoned from 1F-9 to
2F-9-Dup1exes and a portion for
Specific Use for quadrop1exes. rMr.
Garrison showed the Commission and the
audience exhibits of the area. He
said they have approximately 20:acres
which joins Mr. James Rust tract. Mr.
Garrison said they plan to leave 4
~ «
lots single family, then have the
duplex lots around the perimeter, and
the the southeast portion would be for
the quadroplexes.
Mr. Garrison stated he and Mr. Rust
had agreed to develop their-land
together and they would hear Mr.
Rust's request next. He said Mr.
Rust's property is presently zoned
Multi-Family, but he would be
requesting, if this case goes through,
to down-zone his property to Specific
Use for quadroplexes. Mr. Garrison
said if this case is denied, he and
Mr. Rust will go their separate ways
on the development of this land.
Chairman Tucker asked how many living
units he plans for the 20 acres.
The audience yelled out "220" units.
:,
.1
Page 8
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
"-
"--
~-"
";'~,..'
, ;
G··
. -'''~ .'~
-,"'--~
Mr. Hannon said he felt that since
these two cases go together, they
should be heard together, which would
also conserve time.
Mr. Garrison said he was authorized to
speak fo~ Mr. Rust.
Chairman Tucker asked how many units
would there be including Mr. Rust's
property.
Mr. Garrison said he thought Mr.
Rust's property would fall-under the
Grandfather clause.
Mr. Hannon asked what did he mean by
this, does it vary from our existing
Multi-Family zoning requirements, does
it have more density.
Mr. Bronstad said it had been zoned
Multi-Family for several years and it
might allow more density, he was not
sure.
Mr. Hannon asked if they could find
out about that tonight.
~ .
Mr. Bronstad said they could not.
Chairman Tucker stated there were 136
living units not counting Mr. Rust's
property. He said Mr. Rust would be
cutting his down considerably at the
present Multi-Family requirement.
Mr. Hannon stated with the present
single family zoning, Mr. Garrison
would have approximately 70 units
instead of 136 units.
Chairman Tucker said the total for
both projects would be approximately
216 to 220 units.
Mr. Garrison showed more details of
the plot plan and elevation plans of .
the proj ect.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
Page 9
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
'"-,,
'-
Çÿ-n'
,-,~'_:~,'-~.
'" .'
r:¿.
~
Gerald Stewart, 8840 Ma~n S,treet, came
forward. He said he was speaking for
the homeowners both in North Richland
Hills and in Hurst who are opposed to
this request. He stated he has a
petition with over 200 names who are
in opposition to this request.
Mr. Stewart read from the City Zoning
Ordinance which states Multi~Family
zoning shall be located near major
thoroughfares and preferably joining
business zoning. He stated there is
no business zoned property around; it
is all single family homes, and the
streets are not major thoroughfares.
Mr. Stewart stated these people here
invested their life savings here to
provide a home to raise their families
in the peace and quiet of this
neighborhood.
£
Mr. Stewart said in 2F-9 zoning,- he
can build 2~ stories with 1000 square
foot flo~r space and 3 stories ~ith
750 square foot floor space in the
Multi-Fa~ily zoning. He sa;d t~is is
not congenital to the property out
there now. Mr. Stewart said the
people who live in this area feel that
what they have is worth defending. He
said with this development, it would
mean having lease property and rental
property in the area and thèy do not
need or want that. Mr. Stewart said
they want the same type development
as is already there. He said they
oppose this pyramid effect and this
also applies to Mr. Rust's request.
Mr. Stewart said they met with the
Planning and Zoning members who asked
for a compromise, but the homeowners
do not want a compromise. He said he
talked with several real estate people
who said these 8 single family lots
they show will be unsel1ab1e. Mr.
Stewart said they are having trouble
selling homes in the area now and will
have more trouble if duplexes and
quadroplexes go in thère.
Page 10
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
~.
'--
~.,.~
. ....·.-'~,'s
''iY "
r;;~~
~,~
Mr. Stewart said in regard to the
drainage, the people west of Crane
Road can not stand anymore water; it
is already in the flood area.
Mr. Stewart said in regard to access
to this property, they say Precinct
Line Road is scheduled for a 5 lane by
1990, but it is not there now and
does not help us now. He said it is a
single lane road now and very
congested. Mr. Stewart said Crane
Road is also a congested county road
that can not possibly handle this
development.
Mr. Stewart said he had rather-have
the single family plan that Mr.
Garrison submitted previously.
Earl Region, 9200 block of Martin
Road, came forward. He said he owns
property to the south of this r
property. He said his property-.is 400
feet wide and 800 feet deep. Mr.
Region s~id he was concerned ab~ut the
drainage. He said water had already
been in ~r. Campbell's house who told
him he ~á.w 8 inches of water goIng
down Martin last year. Mr. Region
said the 40 foot drainage shown goes
to his property and does not know how
he can do that legally.
Chairman Tucker said without
easements, he can not.
Mr. Region said he does not have an
easement to go across his property.
Chairman Tucker said this problem
would be taken care of in the platting
and if Mr. Region did not give the
easement, he could not put the
drainage there.
Cleta Oggier, 6821 Precinct Line Road,
came forward. She said their proper~y
was to the north of the property in
question. Mrs. Oggier said Mr.
Garrison stated his reason for
requesting this change to Multi-Family
was the escalation cost, but she said
Page 11
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
'--
---
~
~::.:,~~
;~::~:f';~
'"
the escalation cost is not as great as
he says. She said for the last two
years, there has not been a demand for
single family lots, but now there is"
Mrs. Oggier said,he could sell these
lots and still make money. She said
she understands the cost of installing
utilities, etc. has increased, but the
value of the land has increased, also.
Mrs. Oggier said the roads are not
adequate now and it would be
multiplied with this development.
Mrs. Oggier said in the summer, they
have a shortage of drinking water.
Mrs. Oggier said she was requesting
this property be left single family.
Stanley Tatarevich, 6820 Crane Road,
came forward. He said in regard to
the str~ets, Hurst has turned down the
widening of Precinct Line Road until
1990, and Crane Road, thanks to-·
Tarrant County, they put some gravel
on it; a~d Martin Lane being only two
lanes, there is hardly enough room for
two cars.. to pass and it gives v~ry
little room for the children to walk
to school.
Mr. Tatarevich said about the sewer
system, there is an 8" line going down
Main Street, from Crane Road, down to
the creek that joins Smithfield Junior
High and at that point we have a 10"
and a 12" line that goes South. He
said with the increased development,
this would be overloaded and Hurst is
not going to let them tie onto their's
because their's is full.
Mr. Tatarevich said they do have a
water shortage. He said it is not
very good when- you are in the middle
of taking a shower, and you find you
have no water. He said it doesn't
happen one time a year, it happens 5,'
6, to 7 times a year without any
adequate warning. Mr. Tatatevich said
if you want to water your lawn in the
Page 12
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
'----
',-
'..
c~,
~
~,.~
;..;"t.,·l
.';;)~~'.1
summertime, you get up at 3 o'clock in
the morning and water, but you can't
water any later than 4 o'clock because
the people in G1enAnn gets up to water
their yard at 4 o'clock in the
morning.
Mr. Tatarevich said the drainage was
bad, it drains down and when it rains
you tread water for about 100 yards on
Martin.
Mr. Tatarevich said the two school
systems are already full. He said he
called Smithfield Junior High and was
told they had 825 students and they
could only handle 90 more students
within the next 2 years, but said they
were experiencing heavy problems in
the cafeteria now. He said Porter
Elementary is located in Hurst and the
Principle said it has 493 students now
and they can only take an additional
50 students and their cafeteria-.
problems are the same way. So the
school system would have to be ~
updated.
~ .
Mr. Tatarevich said Multi-Family
housing does not pay their share of
taxes
Mr. Tatarevich said his main reason
for not wanting this development is he
built out there 16 years ago and they
have a nice house with a green area,
wild life, and he hates to see all the
birds, squirrels, road runners, and
rabbits go and get apartments in their
place. He said he requests the'
Commission take into consideration
every property owner in this area and
give them a fair shake.
Oscar Oggier. 6821 Precinct Line Road,
came forward. He said regardless who
developed this property or what
developed there, he and his wife are·
asking for water and sewer for their
West 2.5 acres. He said, they want
(provided the Commission approves) an
8' fence with 6" posts all along their
South property line.
Page 13
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
'---.-
'-
r::::::1'
~~~¡
~
Mr. Oggier said Mr. Garrison is
requesting a 81.5% increase in square
footage and a 159% increase in living
quarters over single family and Mr.
Rust is requesting a 20.9 decrease in
building square footage and a 33 1/3%
decrease in number of living quarters.
He said Mr. Rust could be giving up
one or two swimming pools, one
Manager's apartment, one game room and
bar, one full time maintenance man,
off-street parking, etc.
Let Mr. Rust have his apartments zoned
and deny Mr. Garrison everything other
than large single family dwellings.
He said good city planning, good
developers, and builders are an asset
to the city. He showed an alternate
plan for nice condominiums and single
family dwellings, all would be owners,
not renters.
F
Foy E. Moss, 752 Spring Valley;-~urst,
came forward. He asked what the city
of Hurst_ has to say ab()ut this '::_
project, what were their comments to
you.
~
.
Chairman Tucker said we have a
petition from the citizens of Hurst,
nothing from the city of Hurst.
Mr. Moss said this plat does not show
.an easement for the widening of
Precinct Line Road. He said on the
Hurst side of Precinct Line, they
require an easement for the widening
of Precinct Line Road. Mr. Moss
stated he felt it would be a mistake
to approve this without this easement
for future widening of the road.
Mr. Wood stated the plat does show a
25 foot R.O.W. easement on the
official plat.
Tom Butt came forward. He said he
lives in Hurst about 100 yards from
this project. He said he moved from a
Page 14
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
',-,
'-
~.,
'~:~'*¡.\'
'~~t::it/'
(;:~~
~/
very congested part of Fort Worth to
Hurst to get away from that congestion
and he does not want to have to move
again to get away from the congested
traffic and too many people which this
project will create.
,
Kathy Robinson, 6463 Chilton, came
forward. She said they have children
who play on Main Street because they
do not have the traffic congestion,
but with this project, the traffic
would double what they have now; plus
they do not have speeders going forty
miles an hour down the street, it is a
quiet area so lets keep the single
family zoning.
Chairman Tucker asked for a show of
hands of everyone present who are in
opposition to this request.
Chairman Tucker closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood. asked Mr. Garrison aboút the
drainage into the lake, had he _
attemptep to get the 40 foot ea~ement.
Mr. Garrison said the city of North
Richland Hills has acquired that
easement and they require us to
reimburse them for it. It is owned by
the city of North Richland Hills.
Chairman Tucker asked Mr. Bronstad
about this, how far does it go.
Mr. Bronstad said it goes almost to
the lake.
Chairman Tucker asked where does it go
from there.
Mr. Bronstad said it doesn't, it just
overflows out of the lake.
Mr. Hannon asked if the drainage
easement to the lake was adequate.
Mr. Bronstad said it was.
..
. ,
. .
Page 15
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
~;'¡~N
" ,~,..~.,,~
"....\:~
PZ 83-15
DENIED
'"---'
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER.
7.
PZ 83-16
WITHDRAWN
'---,-
8.
PZ 83-35
Q
Ms. Nash made the motion to deny.
PZ 83-15. This motion was second,ed by
Mr. Bowen and the motion to deny
carried 5-0.
The Chairman called a recess at 9:03.
Chairman Tucker calle9 the meeting
back to order at 9:17 P. M.
Commission Member, Mark Wood, h
leave so Alternate John Schwin er
now take his place.
Request of James Rust to- zone Tracts
3B3 ~nd 3B7, T.K. Marti. Survey,
Abstract 1055, from t , ir present
classification of Muti-Family to
proposed c1assific ions of
Multi-Family-Spe . fic Use-Quads and
2F-9-Duplexes. 'is property is
located on th west side of Precinct
Line Road a , the intersection of
Precinct ne Road and Toni Driwe
(City of urst).
Mr.
,
\
withdrew his request. :
Ruest pf Dan J. Anderson, D.V.M. to
ezoneaportion of Tract 10F, Thomas
Peck Survey, Abstract 1210, from its
present classification of Agriculture
to a proposed classification of
Commercial. This property is located
on the west side of Davis Blvd.,
approximately 600 feet north of the
intersection of Shady Grove Road and
Davis Blvd.
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward:
Thomas Elting came forward to
represent Dr. Anderson. a well known
veterinarian. He said he has owned
and operated Haltom City Animal Clinic
for 38 years. Mr. Elting said the .
property in question located on
Highway #1938 approximately 600 feet
Northeast of Shady Grove Road. He
said he felt this property would
conducive for the type of zoning they
are requesting.
IQ.".....'.._.
. ..\i.
'))
(~
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
February 16, 1983
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-002,íCITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-15,
IF-9-1500 TO 2F-9 AND MF-SU-QUADS, GRID 72, 8
.
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find th
we could adequately locate this property on the zoning-map should it
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and. the City Counci
.~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l jc
_cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
:.-., .~.--
.....
1. J :1
;~. 1.:.:. LoC',~
;;crth Richlanè Hille, TX 76118
-. ....
·"1 .,
, ,-
_ , .;... i ~
~~ ~,,~'1\'e
Mér <'c
6'", :2' -K ~
A4 t;'
'1~
We, the undersigned property o\~ers, living with~n 200 feet of the
T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to m~e-known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present
classification of IF-9-One Family Dwellings to proposed classifi-
cations of 2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It. i 3 C:-I.~::· ::'; ""H ~-:', _;:. i ç ~ j t l"la t
(1 ::. conc€r:t:.~[;.tiOll of rental properties \'Jould not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be 'inadequate
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion
(6 present streets are not .capab1e of handling the additional use
"
.
ZIP CODE
1~/KIJ
I~
""--"0, .
Cit~ of North Richland Hills
730Ì N. E. Loop 820
Horth Richland Hills, TX 76118
"----
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
:.r.<;: T~, K. !::r"::>S'):r":('?~ Abstract 1055, \,:ish to make knm·m our strons
"c-'-- -. ~-,- - r' -,' -.-..'-- n.r - ~...~... L' th' t
__ ~_~,_" > ' '~~ _._ ______ ~-'- _-r.>vCora.l ,,]"'[!~...5 ¡rom ,e~r presen
"~:::_~:; ~:~E't 1::. :: -. _ -:-c.~E: Fa~.il:ý D-,:elli:1:::s to propcEed clasf:ific8tic::r=
>.- .'~' - /- ';"1-:0 .r:":':h~ l .\~. ~.l..:'~·1 ~~~; [:.!::: »~l t i-.r ~;·:.ily '~uads_
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community ,
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
.
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
(5 access to th~s area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion
(f y:'esent streets are not capable of ha..rldling the additional use
-- "-- .
6505
ÆÓ<;;
¿!;/-
~
q/~~
5;;f .
ZIJ> CODE
J¡ '/ j-v
r~.---b :3 7;>,
1b/3'v
~
~-",J~
~fa. Y'\ e. 1? ~
I
\\'\\\\N
.....-....j.- ~-
"'~,
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
Horth Richland Hills, TX 76118
---.../
:, t; r;
the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
T: K. J:~_:'t~:! SUT'YE'Y~ Abstract 1::155, \'ish to make knO\'ffi our strong
~ -...~ ,-,' ~,~C t;':(~ re~,~:~~l:1[;of -::í:iJcr~~-~ :rt'~tE fre!:1 their prese:1t
: ·":i.C.,~_7 j C~'J c:~ l}'-?-CTe F2..""::il ~',P LI", ~('>:!..2-i~.:::- to p:r'~}Jc':=e:3 clasrif:'(~ê..tio::s
'_'_ ~_'-:'-~',:) l;·'::.r::~=~,¥ I.i·,·(;lli~-!C[; r...~1~· :-:'..llti-t··8..~".ily ~ua(::.
--
We,
-
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
.
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
\ _/
(5 accëss to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion
(6 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
ZIP CODE
0'-Ho3
c(S7
JO
W:cw(;;~
é;( ,'/ h?-
C(~..,~~
¥J1j~/(
City of North Richl~~d Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
"---
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
:nc T. Ie I~,:,~th SUT'!ey, Abstract 1055, \·Jish to m~1{e knm·m our strong
C~} (.::-,i::':-.~r, ,;,,- rc~,'"):.i:1C of s(:'!(:-~-l "--,C;-'" fro;:] t:1eir "Cresent
[,-_,.;._:".:-"__'.r_,,ir,',.-=-.".'.,~_ r "q ('-e F~-... '''''' 'T- - y- --- - 1 f' +'
_ _ _ _ __ ~, ,,:~ ~~_, _ " .......;.::..' l>,',': ~ ~.' ~') -:Jro;::ose8 C..assi ~Cê..~:LC::S
ci' ~#'r'-:,~:-1.\.'~~-; ~ ':::"-.-;_" _. ~).:.;.:_, ";,,'-_'~"',~-:; ,"!T.;"':_ ,.' '.~"-~: .~. ..-,'-- .~~ .
I _ _ _ .....__ ~ _....... - --- - - - .. t_;::";-LJ-:/ ..~~.:¿;c·:-~.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community -
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
(5 access to t~is area is poor which would result in excessive
. congestion
(6 present streets are not capable of h~~dling the additional use
-...,.--.
.
ZIP CODE HONE NUMBE!
- -'¡9g'~'I¿
N.
1~/ðO cJ.. g I ,T¡
-J~ 0 t.¡Q¡-;2
d l-ð3¥
L/f l{-g'l'
t' a i\.J/7-'\
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
-./
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
-::C,? T. K. l1artin Survey, Abstract 1055, \·¡ish to make knm'!1l our strong
. . ~ -::.':" r'; i (¡ tr:0 r-c;::O:,:'¡l[ of :-(",":-~ ~ tr~cts frc1m their 'Oresent
:~__-::::cr·tir:;! cf IF-9-0::e Far:i; " ;¡ ':2.liY'i..s to r:-rO-:Josed ~lassific2.tio"'f'
.. :: -"-1.','0 Fu:.:ìl:)· j)',:c 11 i::cs é..:;L~ j.;_-,- t:i-F:C)r".ily (~~ad;. .. .
-
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
,_J
(5 accèss to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion
(6 rrcse~t streets are not capable of handling the additional use
.
"
IP CODE
HONE ~1t
11"1'1
~'--'"
,~ ' ,
'/- /. -
¡ -// /
IÎ/, 0/'
P~(t; ~
J( s~~ S~5
9) -at 7
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, TX 76118
-,
'-
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
the T: ~. t1art~n Su!"..ey~ Abstract 1055, ',JÜ,'- tc- make known our strong
"'''-'..,os' +- '-"1 ~-o or'\-..., rr-'c-~'-l~"- Cf' <oE'''r~'-.' .-~..,..--.- "-"..," t'h .¡r t
'-'_1/1 ~~_'" '" ,-,"~ ,c.-....,. oJ.", .~"' -- .....- --'-,,' He... presen
cléJ.~sificé:.ti~!1 of <'::--'1-C:;£ F&:::L;. ~. '('11::" _,~ t _ :-~cposed classifications
of 2}-'-9-1\..to F~iJ:.t 1;':€=-li11£L~ :"~-jd ~·.:.ilti-.~;-;::.;·.i~' .-._:~~:1S.
--.'-'..-
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
',J
(5
access to this area is poor which would result in ~xcessive
congestion
(6
present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
.~
.
--'-
City 0: Horth RichlanÖ Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
Horth Richland Hills, TX 76118
J
We, the undersigned property o~~ers, living outside of 200 feet of
.... "" r " t· c ~'h'''' 1 ("'~r .
~r.e "': I... ,.~,:",..1.: .;,)urv('y~ .l~s~.ro:::~ _.!~.>, '.nsb to make known our strong
c:-_ '--:~=-',. u) -:;,c r(,.::-",::-Ú;-T (.'2 :-'-..-:':':'~_ :':, :::.: from their present
c~ .. :..: ~ ,::;=-"~i~:. of li'-~'-C:,; :;:"¡,;:;.ÍJ:-: L .;-c'3 to proposed classifications
Co:'" :.'~_ __","S' ?~.:.":_J.:\- }}.·cl~~i7~S> ;;...... ~._", ..~._ _ .~~~- ~uads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
\-iith the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 se~er facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
v
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion
.'
"'I:ITTT T 1.T A ~ A1)D~SS ZIP CODE PHONE 1-.....;ffiE.
~.~. C . \~ C¡C¡I.3 /M~ ,tV '/}¡¡Æ í?/fò 1.~ (-ì7' 2~
"''' ~ '""\. ~ I '.5 ~
.
"""-
~
.
"
,
. ..
-
- --
-
~-~
.
. - - n' n --
-
.
It
. . --
-
.
.. _. .- .....-.- -. - -- --
(6 present streets are not capable of ~~~dling the additional use
. ,
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
llorth Richland Hills, TX 76118
'---
w~, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
-,,<> T K H .... ~ ^"- t
~~'--r".-~"'":,"·~_!":'~~ .)~::(':_,.."tDsrract lCr::5. '.-lÜh ~o make knO\·.'!1 our strong
¡;~ ~ E·~,;:~ i ;~; ." j ~;~ :~f';~,~~:E;)1~{~~ ~E~~~~ ~ :~~~:~:;~ ~~:::~ii<at i o~s
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not b~ congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequatè
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion
(6 pre5e~t streets are not capable of hfu~dling the additional use
/ \..-.-
.
to~
~-.
1~ L~O
It'
( I
t"''''
-,. 1
~~\~\'\\-~~>v~ 'tt,
(05,/7 ~;'VU'VL&-n-S-
\)
i (
{(
/("
u
If
) , I , \ I II
(oS 2- 9 5 -L"-,v'V yVL.(,"?'t./ ') ~ -7(~ (9 ~" L( 85'133.
// /,/ //
/1
I (
If
I I
d 76
(lfj"-t -s,J
(
~~--;!..
tf () <> _I.!~
I v l¡~v
'fy"-£2t.
fr1
City of :Iorth Richlanri Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
Horth Richland Hills, TX 76118
r----/
/
¡
We, the undersigned property owners, living ohtside of 200 feet of
"- r:"\""."'. S ^'h t ' c~ .
.he .: :.. ,._;,~ .urvey~ "1~s.r8.ct c.O"), \!~~h ~o make ~o\'m our strong
_~. u._.~ ' . TC~:-:~:lYl~ 01 'OC:;': ::"'~'::;, IT':'!1': the~r present
::;.. _. ~'._:, _:. ~-';' ]}è-9-0::.e F&:-:il- l' ,;;lLr,:-- tc -;;To-::Josed classifica.tions
. . . _ ~ ::;::uy lr,'c:'iil1[G [._:__,;c 1...:_, ;,-::cc~,U:' '-~~&-.::~.
~
--,,/
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
.
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
'-I
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion -
(6 pTe~ent streets are not capable of handling the additional use
.
ZIP CODE
55
û
IU
76/f/)
b~OO C~ ~.O.
~ ~
City of North Richl~~d Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
"---
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
:1': ~_:.:..~:_J'!a!'ti:- ~>;'!"''!~:r~ Abstract 1055, Hish to make kno"m our strong
_ _: ""._~_......:._(;.1 t(.~ t..'-c :·(=:-;·...:.nc of s€\Tcrz_l :rFlC"t.:: f=cm t!""4eir '[.ìresent
". _~".t'~...~~..¡~~ C.I:' '--, (' F·' 1, '1' t -
. ...."_~_':"_~_ _' _ .' __ - .:ie arra.J..Y p¡'e~ ~,:~s C pro;:osed clas~ificé:.tiç!:!,
v_ -) -0-·~"'::) ?¡;:::.:.~ -'. L-'(~ :'il1r-::; and I:u1 ti-F-c;:¡i1 ,- Juar:~
~ w - ~~. ~~ ~ ~~.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration qf rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in~the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
1,_- j
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
- congestion
(6 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
/' L·
.-
)
~/Jb /rJ-bblí
7& (~¡ 2jff'/CC
~Wþ
--....1..
J
G, I yu
7(;(j/6
CJ R.)- - J~
~ì Y-3(fj
L(f'j-- ,J¿~
1¿,./'ðè)
l./7'8 -$ý'~
Co\8CJ
'"
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
~
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
.I.ì-",'" }' l' ... 's Ab t , 0".. .
-' 1... ..'1r ~ ~=' . urvf':,', s ract ~ ::,5, \'nsh to make knO\'!I1 our stron"'
'~::_~';~~~J-':'_-'-:-~' ~~~~:.:.:<; af~;'¡c=:::' ~~actf: :1'-:-,;':1 tJ.eir present 0
, _ ..~_.. "-~,-~:l C, OJ-,-l - .-O~"e F&J:u-,-:; l},:cll~:"lf'S to y--;oposed classifications
-.,}-' ~ i - S-;L·.,~c ?¿~~1i} :¡.. il\:e II inEs c.nd J':ul t i -F:~~¡ilJr ~:1é.i c3:~.
- - - _.-
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
t __.'
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
- congestion -
(6 present streets ~c rot capable of h~~dlin£ the additional use
.
&5/)q: ~
05/6
(5).1-
h 5 ;1..4
'¡tl./
0;'1./
''j)fZ
HONE N'~h,
.l..(' /. :¡--y--
Cf f{5;Y¡7r
'Ii 5-;J'1tl
76/t'CJ 43s cJ 901
~~,
.¥- -- -
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, TX 76118
\--
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
:he T:.~. n2:r'ti:~ S'..'T'\Tey~ Abstract 1055, \-!ish to make knO\·!J1 our strong
r':'~ C·.~-"" :::~::-.. ~ r.', ~ T'(- ?Ac=·.:.~nf of ::C:V0.~_' ~<~ ~~::'C't!? frcr:¡ t::eir "C:rese!1t
. " ,,~_" .t'~ ~, J "- "-, '" n (' F " , ' 11 . , ' -
,________y, ,-_r" c-~ _. -,.- .:le a.'T;1..L:: 1),'(..... :'Y'[S to ?ro:::cs~-:1 clas~ifications
c '-. --;--::'-_'0 ::-::;,::,::,_)" l.:,'elli!1gs ~d !,,,,::'Li-l :'.i:"- ",..;a-::::..
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
....,i th the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
\,J
(5 acc~SS to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion '
(6 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
__J \..,,;/
.
55
'à
'17>' c
<?:~q6 ~ ~
,
Lf--ü yY\~
t<fJJ ~
--
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
-/
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
:LE~ T:,~:' ¡;~!"t in S))!",!",:)' ~ Abstract 1055! vÜ,h to make lr..no.m our strong
r~-~-r',~·:.:: c_,--, ~ ~ -. > )"-:'=':''.":':'..3-:1[" of ~!:,:",:~".-:.. :~:,,~-::::t::: :ro-::¡ t}ìeir nresent
, . r . " -,' -, -, r (\ F . 1 - , . ¿
.. : ,:,~:J.:_ ;,C"::lC"-' ,.I ,-,-:-;-v:.:e a..!':'11.. y 1;.·~..:..11:-·:-,~ tc T'ro;;(,:3~:1 clasr:ificaticns
(.. :- -'~_!~".'(\ l-:':r::i- ~':' 1:"- ~,·lli:1gs ard j.~:;._l~i_;~.;.i~~· ..~;;
Ii is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
'vIi th the homes in the rest of the communi ty
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequatè
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
, ,
, -'
(5 access to thjs area is poor which would result in excessive
- congestion
(6 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
.
Ð SS
~.:S oS Co (/~fèD <!r.
IJ R H 76
~ 5"0 ~ Cð t \~R.Þ C.
o
tS-/t ~ (!;t. cfO
ZIP COÐE
HONE ~~
~
<I~.s-¢ 833
i --' ()
1-fS:SI3~
6S2.9 c.ð¿L/7/2þ _('/7 76/.1'0
({; S" ¿J S ;¡~ 7¿ /tf"¿;?
4ð'.5-({d"30
f/1'5-¿J,!/¿/
< ..
.l/cÝ~ -- ;.j9~
" \' "
Þ- ¡-¡;;ZIt
P. ¡ 1-0 '7 ) ~
f <f:/ J
7&(/,0
-----
7? ..~'
.....""r_
~- -/ '2ò
d!'1,- S SC~
.
fcg5- 'ßtfl
<joSS -3<1-(S
o
Lc(g'ò
í~ tVú
~q3::3 &-4--._
!
<;'-1)7
tt>4o I
"/ c. rg-O
C(g')=- Vb.>;
X
I ,
\\i\f\ I ¡V
órr93(:
;2ð/- 173~
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
Uorth Richland. Hills, TX 76118
'''--..
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
~h: ? Y.. Hnrtin Survey, Abstract 1055, \Jish to make knO\'!I1 our stron!7
~ ·J....:...·'1 ~o t~r-, rl":.~c'··_~yj-.. 0.; ~ t':'Y'o:.>' .t..~_,,+_ '" - t1- . -
~.........~ L~, _.1.\. çô-J "...J...,~ _ ...:CV~_ ~__ i..Á :-;..............;: .l.rc...~ ~;e2r TIresent
i~5.cB.tio!1 of 1l"-?-0:1E: Fa.;:il~: L....:ell~::=s tc nrOYJOE<::J ~l<;.ssifica.tions
_'- ~-l\,'o FamiJ y Ij·..:t=..2-i:-<:s ê.T1d :'~".ll~i-=~":"'1il~" ~~'~~.~,.(-s.
,~.,-' It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion .
(6 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
.'
/
ZIP CODE
ff-;:JJ{L¿
\)W 621) 7b/ /~ 1'tRý/3
(þQ 7&/fJD t.JJS-;4/
'f
t (
( (
- ( -5
~;'-8i~
<./-f00k
I I
8
I(
~~\~
!'7t:AJ
9
://ft:0
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
-../
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
:}:( T. K. J-jo.rtin Survey, Abstract 1055, vish to make knm·m our strong
~_:.. - ~_':~:.r<-~ tJ) t;lC ~·(?;:c2.i, ~~. of ~ t:·'j~Y-2.~_. -:re,cts i'rom thEir t:.:rcser1t
T,-.-~,-':1;""':""+-~""'r 0.(' 11~ n C"'~ - F~.,......,':' - "'!".... ...,. ,.. + ' .... .. .
~.___C_,\....l'''_'__.d ..-_...-~..-,._ £:. -c....;u_..:.~, J....,..e~_-:!..y.r--~ ~0 T:ro-;JnF'ea cl~sf"'fJ.c&t10""S
-_~"'-~1-'J>..,~o Félz::.ily I)'..'t?l2.i:·l~~;-:- &::~3. 1·~":.-=- ti-FD,~ily ~~~~:.~:s. .. ~-. ....
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be-inadequate
-,'
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion
(6 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
.
~
('-¡!J1 {l ¿~
~1dð ~,
<? ¿;,/--J/
<¡
I
1/ cZ /lì (LvCA-
ß 7/¿ i7l OM"
I
tl~t I 0U
ZIP CODE
¿ t I ¡?J
1&/ rD
7~' g>ò
Jl
;{ff/-("'1~
---,
&S"'0- $7
!Lctf?- 5.Eþ
'i
7ø/ ¿;
!ß / f1J
'-/rr:- 19~
t.f%.5~ r31,
/} (PI (J ¿¡ r .5-0 tJJ
_.- - -.- -
70/80 18.s-8'1c8
7/?jýû zPJ.'ì-"z3 J
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North RichlandHills, TX 76118
"--
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
the T: ~. Marti~ Su!".rey ~ Abstract 1055, ...!ish to make ki'10\·m our strong
~___~_'"''''',",'''' to ....-'" .,.Eo~"·'·'n~ of al t t ~ t,· t
'_." _ _ ~_..d '-.He . ...:--_j......¿ sever'" ra::: s lrom ,je~!' presen
n 1 .. _,,,.; ,-; t· .r 'T:' r f"\.. F~ ·1 D 11' t ,'"
'.__..h. ,-ce, ~on OJ ,u-}-v~,e ""rr.~ y ,·re ~ncs 0 :proposeo. clasSlf1cat10:lS
c.. ¿~'_n,_'l\.'o Fru:-,iJy D'ò:c:llìngs ar,d l1ulti-Farnily Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion
(6 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
./ ,,-.
.
ZIP CODE
/h
~
~~~
'13 +-
?? e d. 'f '-/ì1 ~ S;:;¡4
~ () , (/ Þ /' t:\. )
~ M . ,I \ / .JI.)f__J'
/(" I __ _--r'J _ ./_______
/...¿ /....) /A /' . - -:;I¡ uê"Å.-/
~ I . ~
~'t J7:~.~-
C . i? <j
þ/}...A-"'-__ _, '- I ~} '"
/:;
-~/
'J ¿I ~/)
"7 ,- . _ (7j _
~J I ../ 7 ,"-
-?:1'--- pZ,~ I!;¡'
"7 /~ /y- / :
. '-'! ¡, 1.../
;z.P/ --së!:.
é1'új '7
--:J I n-) J.¡ ,'~ <:'
I
-"12
0j--.c' l
/'(IJ-C
j¡jr /.£J'7
i ) ) - /
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
~
We, the undersigned property owners, living outside of 200 feet of
the T. K. Hartin Su~!e:, Abstr8ct 1055, wish to make knovm our strong
('~......r'.:itic-n to the:- rezc:~in[ ci rE'~.·~cr:}.l t:--ç-tct::, frC'!'n tÌ1eir T:resent
n- - -,--~ r" r-",' ~ ~~ Cf' ' ~,' " (;-'e ï;'__~, ¡-, ,-," t "1" f" "
.. _ ~ -_ 0__.. ~ _'. _,,( L..;... ,"_;' .' ...!...~ -:;-.;,;. .J. c;.....:.. .1...· J,...I...~-:e ...........1.!":' r-s . 0 pro~ose8 c ....8.SE'J. ~Cê.t1.0ns
C~l .-:;'~ -S;-'.I.\·~o f'ar:liJ._:,- Iï.-:€lli:1C~ é..L:~'- i.'..;;.~ti-F¿..;~~ily :~Uél':!;.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial
with the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 sewer facilities would be inadequate
(4 water facilities would be inadequate
\_)
(5 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive
congestion -
(6 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
.
ZIP CODE
í/; )~D
J'_
-
~
èity of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
1.'30
.¿~ ¿¡~
~7tY
"-
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-g-One Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the ~est of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
-.
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER
1'd..-S ~,,'\ U,
'(
-.s:2' 1
'1"D
#'ð7-ð U
I '
It I ~ ~
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi- .~
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in exces~ive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the , additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE
PHONE NUMBER
~"""
Ci~y of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
7:; Dtt.:.J¡1f':~!ij,1
V111~~, ~ ~
',,---
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
{l a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
{2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
{3 property values would decrease
{4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
{5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER
ú;
1(PO~3
7 ~-3
7bo.s-3
t (
l(
I I
l~oS~
\l
fS'c -dfd7
('
7/ .
111
7/3
(j ç.$ 2.") J -\11 I
.~/l/ os:3
~
G/fNh, I'~.J 7(pOÇ 3
/00.5 3
,
"
. /.-/ß./1
yi "
. './/rí/¡/./
7/,1 S-O~7j
-,'
- . .
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
·"};L.~
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
-./
It is our contention that
Cù
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
/\
~:
~ ~-
-. '-. --....'-"
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER
1~ö:S3 4 [5- &7ZI
2.k' . 12./"1-
0») CSó (](t9.r-
·
Ci,ty of North Rich1and Hills 1', '3 Ò
7301 N. E. Loop 820
No~th Richland Hills, TX 76118
hÏ~ ~ 0+ ~ PM
1~,~
~~.
",--.
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of 1F-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
/]'
c-
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 ,drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
/,
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE
PHONE NUMBER
FULL NAME
f"/" 1_ . -~ -
'?it)- -
~ 7J- f; -;¿O 7C¡
'-
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, TX 76118
/:'3 Ò
7~ ..~fI;I
'/l~
,~
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong í. -, ,
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present c1assifi- ( Jby-/
cation of 1F-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the ~est of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
d
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER
)up".,L.a....-." 7¿. ð 53 ..2,f 1- 5'0-< ~
7¿ P G".3 OlR/- ~~Ö'--
4-
/J - ~ .
l}f~ÁrM /()4~
C~ty of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, TX 76118
/vl]1J ?k ~
~
:/
'-
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of 1F-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
@
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER
-f1'!J-. J 1
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi- ~
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE
PHONE NUMBER
.300
)
-' .-
èity of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
"7 .. .J2> \
~ -XiV
~~~.J
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
'-
It is our contention that
{l a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
{2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
{3 property values would decrease
{4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
/«~
JtJptJ
\ \
l I
. ,
. .
.
ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER
? 605 J ?9?-5'37'
'-
----
-
, ,
----
~/-J-/J
õ<cf /-J' /.S<.
76(j!J)
7?ðS3
10053
Ci ty of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-g-One Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
---../'
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE PHONE ,NUMBER
(,
1'5z
~'-?7~
( .
" ,
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820 ~
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
-7
-¡~'3¿) 74 ~
~/
'---
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-g-One Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE
PHONE NUMBER
, .I:Jt'
i I
City of North Richland Hills L
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
-;> G;I!~
~~.~~
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract lOSS, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
--/
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(S present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE
PHONE NUMBER
"'-""- '-
· Ci ty of North Rich12md Hills -"
7'301 N. E. Loop 820
No~th Richland Hills, TX 76118
~~_, 7:~ dI~, ~
'-
We, the unde~signed concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER
"1(¿,O~-j
766
~ tot)~ ~
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong -/
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE
PHONE NUMBER
?~o..r ...3
76"JS
..-/-
r . ....
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
7.'3ò
~ Lor ~
"-
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of ,Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drai~age facilities would be inadequate
~
(3 property values would decrease
--..
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the add,i tional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
CODE PHON~ NUMBER
-'-
--.
--
'City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
"'7 / 3Ò
~~. '7t-~
~7
'-
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of -Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract lOSS, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-9-0ne Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
(1 a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
(2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
(4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER
?'o~-l
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
'7,} 5ð
~~fØ:
/
~
We, the undersigned concerned citizens of Hurst, living outside 200 feet
of the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, wish to make known our strong
opposition to the rezoning of several tracts from their present classifi-
cation of IF-g-One Family DWellings to proposed classifications of
2F-9-Two Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Quads.
It is our contention that
--..-/
{l a concentration of rental properties would not be congenial with
the homes in the rest of the community
- - ._~ .
{2 drainage facilities would be inadequate
(3 property values would decrease
{4 access to this area is poor which would result in excessive congestion
(5 present streets are not capable of handling the additional use
FULL NAME
ADDRESS
7 .3 c; 4.r¡?~ Cr.
??>;? As
ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER
3
76ðS 3 ~
7{,(J 53
760"53 ZG'1 -/592
7~05J 41<5-6//
85~~4IO
~'-
çl- ý;;-/~
Is-'
July 30, 1983
City Council
City of North Richland Hills '
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Sirs:
Due to an conflicting meeting we are unable to be at the council
meeting tonight, and would appreciate this letter being read.
We reside at 8920 and '8912 Martin Lane in North Richland Hills,
Texas, and are very interested in the proposed zoning case affecting
the property between Crane Road and Precinct Line Road. Martin Lane
has become a major traffic artery for traffic out of the Glenan.
Addition, thru traffic ·from Davis to Precinct (both ways) and even
traffic from some of the new-sub-divisions farther north. EVen
now there are three additional sub-divisions being developed between
Eden Road and Precinct Line Road. .
We both feel it is imperitive that additional streets be developed
to Precinct Line Road. Most tracts on Precinct Line Road in that
area are small tracts under separate own~rship and will be Véry
unlikely to dedicate streets without condemnation preceedures.
Therefore we both wo~ld like to go on record as favoring the
zoning change to allow the street from Crane to Precinct Line
Road.
.r~ ~ u......(...
Neither of us have any present or fur\kar intended interest in
said tracts of land.
Respectfully Yours,
¿a k Rc:se.£9:y,
~.~
Lee ~y Bonham
.£.. f(7 iS~
',,--
ILt
, "~';; ~,·~,,<~~t,.:~5~i~ '
{:"~¥:~,,,,*';.~',;:7~:~-
O~lNANCE NO. (04\
,,--- _. _......~..
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTlCLE XXlX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS.
SECTlON lOF ORDINANCE 1179. ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS,
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONlNG COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13. 1967.
AS AMENDED JANUARY 27. 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECO~ATION
IS SUBMITTED T~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-15 the following described property shall
not be rezoned from 1F-9-1500 to 2F-9 and Multi-Family-Quads.
TRACT FOR 2F-9-DUPLEXES
. The following described tract or parcel of land situated in the T.K. Martin
Survey, Abstract 1055, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly
described as follows:
----
¡-
BEGINNING North 89 degrees 52 minutes East a distance of 210.0 feet ~rom '
the Southwest corner of a tract as recorded on Page 540 of Volume 6484 in
the Tarrant County Deed Re~ords;
THENCE North 89 degrees 52 minutes East a distance of 291.22 feet;
p .
THENCE South 89 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 124.91
feet;
THENCE North 0 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 695.44
feet;
THENCE South 89 degrees 57 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 460.0
feet;
THENCE South 0 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 270.0 feet;
THENCE South 89 degrees 57 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 445.0
feet;
THENCE North 0 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 115.91
feet;
THENCE North 87 degrees 38 minutes West a distance of 139.92 feet;
THENCE North 2 degrees 22 minutes East a distance of 20.03 feet;
THENCE North 89 degrees 22 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 158.47
feet;
Page 3
THENCE North 89 degrees 57 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 460.0
feet;
'-
THENCE South 0 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 695.44 feet
to the place of beginning and containing 6.388 acres of land more or less.
This property is located approximately 200 feet east of Crane Road and
extends eastward to 200 feet west of Precinct Line Road.
DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF MAY, 1983.
&~C ~r-
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
7?;~~ (if? L;/¡ ~
SECRETARY PL ING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HI~LS
'ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE liO.
PZ-83-15 IS HEREBY REZONED
THIS DAY OF ~
..
.
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
"-
•
C •
■ Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting'Engineers -
- June 28, '1983 - -
Mr . Rodger N. Line, City Manager _
City of North Richland Hills
738i"tt:E;- Loop 82G - -- — ---
North Richland Hills , Texas 76118
Re: PZ 83-39 , Request for Appeal
Dear Sir:
On May 26, 1983, the Planning and Zoning . Commission denied
a request for a zoning change on the above referenced project.
The owner would like to ask for an appeal hearing before the
City Council .
It is hoped that the Council will give this appeal its
consideration and grant us an opportunity for an appeal
hearing.
Sincerely,
I it •
De •ert • . Stem•r>_•ge, '/ .
DRS/et
41198 nalev Suite 103 • North Rutland Hills Tevaa7R11R • IR171 7R4-17R11
....
PRESENT ZONING:
C-'
.,
(
\..
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPLICATION FOR 10NING CHANGE
Å~.
CHANGE TO: Z F ~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .,v-avf- 5A
NEW OWNER:
PREVIOUS OWNER:
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEERtSURVEYOR:
"---
REASON eOR ZONING
CHANGE: -
J '
PROPOSED USE:
ZONING FEE:'
COPIES REQUIRED
~A;L /\J- /~8:J
e /
''----
.
-
fJÎ:JJ+, :If 32-1 /vA, C8.k' ~C/rv~
Name 'Tie.r-yo¿:¡- Fj~alAci~(. LIAr. PhoneÓ,,,)Z.80-4Z-l.¡3
I
Address ~ 1'2. 5' AdA.i-I1.f" Ave '/ 5",~ Oi ej ^ , {'A tj2. J I~
Nalte Phone
Add,.ess-
ç u
Name. _e Q~ i1/ð-v
.
a ~
(;/n-é'J.'
Phone
Address
PhoDe~?,)z ¡t;-13b 3'
Ff./v/:JyK 7b/1f
Name ()P)k;+ f.. '~órid~,,_
Address 3"7 Ztlf, F/oi""1 s".f;
/
--P~" ~ Jf-- +eo hunLj)uf le,vp..5
buf/ex€ ~
$156.00
cf2,..ðd. tJ-ð
"Z-~
~ copies of plat
a-~
~r
Signature 0 pp cant or Agent
1····
13.907 ACRE TRACT OUT OF THE
WM. COX SURVEY. ASST. 321
TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS
'",;' " .~,
.
..,1
:.\;,
;),
-',
,," ¡1",
, i
$~:~;'
'~- ,,;.
-~~~~'~.'",
I¡ii.~: .','
Ii""
,...'; 1.~.
,,;'If.
--1
--
I
2
3
z
Q 4
!::
c
oct
-
.....
<\
IC\Î
I'q-
o
-
i5
en -~
UJ oW- -- Ìo
Z 15 () -::
<(oct600
...J 0
..I~
a:I II:
e
10
.
,
,
"',.
i- ;, ......o<t.
1:\ ~
'r'
ø
4(
o
a:
.........
t
,f
VICINITY MAP
N.T. s. - - "'"
-...
S87õii'45"E 911.33'
13.907 AC.
\ ~
,':> dO~
~,~: ~
~<V~O.;.·
~ ,~.
~~ ~O
-- ~I--- .~. ~
0"' o..~
~..t.o
/
....
.
-1
...
~(
"
>-
SCA lE:
1"= 200'
~;.
. .",.
'~;., r"
-
"'.~¢
. .:.,..,..-
-'"
.if
..,. :~:
._ _f'>¡'
METES and BOUNDS
BEING all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and
being situated in the WM. COX SURVEY, A-32l, Tarrant County,
Texas, a part of Fred O. Barney Tract as recorded in Volume
1916, Page 254, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being
more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a steel rod in the Northerly R. O. W. line of
Turner Road and the Southeast corner Lot 10, Block 7,
Smithfield Acres Addition as recorded in Volume 388-2, Page
132, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
',---
THENCE North 3 degrees 01 minute 15 seconds East with East
line said Smithfield Acres, a distance of 1042.27 feet to a
steel rod for corner, being the Northeast corner of said
Smithfield Acres, 30.0 feet North 3 degrees 01 minutes 15
seconds East from the Northeast corner Lot 1, Block 7,
Smithfield Acres;
THENCE South 87 degrees 12 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance
of 911.33 feet to a steel rod for corner; said point being the
Northwest corner of F~ed O. Barney, Jr. tract as recorded in
Volume 3594, Page 100, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE South 2 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds West, with West
line of said Fred 0 Barney, Jr. tract, a distance of 365.55
feet to a steel rod for corner in Northerly R. O. W. line of
Turner Road; said point being North 2 degrees 51 minutes
30 seconds East, 37.45 feet from the Southwest corner said Fred
O. Barney, Jr~ tract;
,-
THENCE South 61 de~rees 17 minutes West, with said Northerly
R. O. W. line, a d~stance of 733.71 feet to a steel rod, an
angle point in said R. O. W. ;
THENCE South 47 degrees 24 minutes 10 seconds West, with said
Northerly R. O. W. line, a distance of 412.15 feet to the
place of beginning and containing 13.907 acres of land, more
or less,
From the desk of
"` WANDA CALVERT
114 AL-
Al F y u/oa/
d1 O`er — ---
dre
ti 711.,go-
,zQ�Q MA4 ' 2
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
June 28, 1983
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
730 IN. E. Loop 82û'
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: PZ 83-39, Request for Appeal
Dear Sir:
On May 26, 1983, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied
a request for a zoning change on the above referenced project.
The owner would like to ask for an appeal hearing before the
City Council.
It is hoped that the Council will give this appeal its
consideration and grant us an opportunity for an appeal
hearing.
Sincerely,
~d~te~~.
DRS/et
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363
DATE: June 23, 198~
SUBJECT :.
PZ 83-40 Zoning request for Tracts 12 & 12A, J. Bar10ugh Survey. Abstract 130.
and Tract 2, Wm. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from Agriculture to IF-9-l500,
IF-B-1400 and 1F-B-1200:
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND:
This property is located on the south side of Chapman Road and bounded ~the-
west by Richfield ParK.
There were 59 ?ropertv owners contacted and there were people there in opposition.
Mr. Kimmell wishes to zone the property along Chapman Road IF-9-1500, along the southwest
corner which joins North Pa~k Estates, he wishes to zonelF-8-l400, and the remainder of
the 67 acres IF-8-l200. Mr. Kimmell did say he would agree to changing this to IF-8-l300.
There was much concern about the traffic and drainage. The houses will have driveways
on Chapman Road causing them to have to back out onto that congested street. It was also
stated that Chapman Road was full of chug holes and floods evervtime it rains.
The Planni~~ and Zonin~Commission recommended approval of this request with the stipu1~tion
that the change be made from 1F-B-1200 to IF-8-1300.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial of Zoning reqy~ßt.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
x
ACCOUNT NUMBER: NIA
...2J' ~#J.I ~
-----------------'------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- ...-
n _ I ~
Q)\~",I
~
¡C
\,>':> . (<:\:
\~ I() 0
-/f \c;CO
Page 31
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
L
ØtAIr~~~~~""""~~'If!~ # 'r>,..: __,-:~~~_ _ .,..... .7"""-'-__
family zoning, the question
about the drainage and they said th
alleviate the'drainage problem. ~.
Larriviere stated with the adde~
development he would be floodEd. Mr.
Larriviere stated there are/Íour
places within a half mil~~that already
is zoned multi-family; at Smithfield
and Starnes, Davis a~,~ewman, Watauga
and Smithfield Road¡"and Chapman and
Little Ranch Road/I Mr. Larriviere
stated with al~Æhese, what next, how
much more mu~pi-family?
"'~
J'
Mr. Larr~vìere stated he thought the
reason the City Council turned the
,~
prev~oùs request down was because of
4
th~~sewerage problem, the traffic, and
~Hé flooding conditions; those condi-
,/"'tions are still there.
/'
:.f'
,,/ Chairman Tucker closed the Public
,-
~' Hearing.
/"
/l
..1'
,¡
;/
I'
./
/'"
- /
/
,,/
,/ PZ 83-39
// DENIED
/
.-
-~~--...
_._~
15. PZ 83-40
Mr. Hannon asked Mr. Bronstad about
the Water Master Plan. He said it
shows a 24 inch water line going
across the back of this property and
asked what was scheduled on this; what
is the priority?
Mr. Bronstad stated he was not sure of
priority, but they were waiting for
the City Council to give them the go
ahead.
Mr. Schubert made the motion to deny
PZ 83-39. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion to deny
carried 4-1, with Mr. Hannon voting
against denial.
-
.-.~~-............-
Request of Frank Kimmell, Trustee to
rezone Tracts 12 & 12A, John Barlough
Survey, Abstract 130, and Tract 2,
William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010,
from their present classification of
Agriculture to a proposed classifica-
tion of IF-9-1S00, IF-8-1400 and IF-8-
1200-0ne Family Dwellings.
This property is located on the south
side of Chapman Road and bounded on
the west by Richfield Park.
Page 32
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
Mr. Hannon stated that due to a
conflict of interest, he would like to
step down.
Mr. Frank Kimmell, Co-Owner of
Richland Land Company, came forward.
Mr. Kimmell stated that this request
was for approximately 67 acres on
Chapman Drive.
Mr. Kimmell stated that immediately
east of this tract the property was
undeveloped, but was zoned 2F-9; at
the southeast corner the property was
zoned commercial; the property to the
south was zoned industrial, but
undeveloped; and the acres to the
southwest is North Park Estates, which
is zoned 1F-7; the property to the
west is Richfield Park with Agricul-
tural zoning; the property to the west
of Richfield Park was developed and
zoned IF-7; the other areas to the
west of this property is zoned 1F-12;
the properties to the north and
northeast are undeveloped and are
zoned Agricultural; and the northeast
corner is McComas Addition, which is
developed and is zoned IF-9.
Mr. Kimmell stated their zoning request
covers three different levels, on
Chapman Road they are asking for IF-9
zoning with 1,500 square foot
minimums. Mr. Kimmell stated according
to the tax records, 92% of the
existing homes in McComas Addition arß
under 1,600 square feet. Mr. Kimmell
stated they felt the 1F-9 zoning was a
good transitional zoning between the
development to the north and their
proposed development to the south.
Mr. Kimmell stated where their property
joins North Park Estates they are
requesting 1F-8-1400. Mr. Kimmell
stated they are requesting a higher
zoning than North Park and that the
tax rolls show 95% of the homes in
North Park are under 1,500 square
feet.
Page 33
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
Mr. Kimmell stated that they were
requesting 1F-8 zoning for the balance
of their tract, which is equal to or
better than all the other residential
zonings, as far to the west as Rufe
Snow Drive, as far south as Watauga
Drive and as far to the east as
Smithfield Road. Mr. Kimmell stated
they feel they are compatible to the
zoning in the area.
Mr. Kimmell stated that there had been
some discussion of a north-south
collector street in this general area.
He stated they are proposing to plat
Fox Hollow Lane a 60 foot width which
could be used as a collector street if
the City so desired. Mr. Kimmell
stated they could make either Fox
Hollow Lane or Little Ranch Road as
the collector street on the final
plat.
,
Mr. Kimmell stated that in North Park
Estates there was a Y-inlet in which
most of this 67 acre tract drains
into. Mr. Kimmell stated their drainage
and storm sewer plans would divert
that run off to a series of sewers
existing out of these cul-de-sacs into
the creek that is in the park area.
Mr. Kimmell stated he had visited with
the City Staff and they see no problem
with this. He stated this should
alleviate the flooding in this area.
Mr. Kimmell stated they had only four
lots in their proposed development
that would continue to drain into that
Y-inlet.
Mr. Kimmell stated they felt the zoning
they were requesting was complimentary
to the existing development in the
area and requested approval of this
request.
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please corne forward.
Page 34
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
Mr. Owen Long came forward. Mr. Long
stated he owned the property to the
south of this property, which was
presently zoned industrial. Mr. Long
stated he planned to come in at a
later date and vacate the plat of Fox
Hollow Addition. He stated he had no
real concern with the proposed
development to the north of them.
Mr. Long stated he was doing the
engineering on this and it would be
submitted next month. Mr. Long stated
there would be a concrete lined
channel thru this property, and it
would be on the Planning and Zoning's
next agenda. Mr. Long stated they
planned to realien and restructure
that drainage ditch.
Mr. Long stated Fox HolLow Lane could
be a collector street, they have had a
box culvert at the railroad and had
been paid for for eight or nine years,
so it would not be hard to made Fox
Hollow Lane a collector street.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
Mr. Ted Gay, 6440 Sudbury Way, came
forward. Mr. Gay stated he was not
against the development; however, the
traffic needs to be addressed. Mr.
Gay stated with the construction of
Rufe Snow, it mades the traffic more
congested and if they had a north
south route, they were going to have a
lot of traffic down Little Ranch and
will cause problems getting on Watauga
Road.
Mr. Gay stated he would like to
request this zoning be denied until a
traffic pattern was worked out and try
to get this Fox Hollow Lane tied down
more.
Mr. Tom Ferruggia, 6448 Sudbury Way,
came forward. Mr. Ferruggia stated he
had had flooding at his house for
several years. He stated he had
Page 35
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
called the City to see if they could
do anything about it; the City said
they did not own the land and could
not do anything about it. Mr.
Ferrugigia stated he had had to open
his gate in his back yard and let out
3~ feet of water. Mr. Ferruggia
stated he was in agreement of the
development of this land, but he
requested that they insure that the
land will drain correctly. Mr.
Ferruggia stated his other concern was
in regard to square footage. He
stated his house was approximately
1,585 square feet and asked what the
proposed zoning would be next to him.
Chairman Tucker said it would be 1,400
square feet.
Mr. Ferruggia said he had his house up
for sale earlier this year, but took
it off the market. Mr. Ferruggia
stated he may try to sell it again and
would not want anything to hinder the
market value of his property. Mr.
Ferruggia stated he would request to
increase them a 100 feet or so.
Mr. Calvin McKutchin came forward. Mr.
McKutchin stated he lived on Sudbury
Way. Mr. McKutchin stated he wanted
to reiterate what the previous
gentlemen had said about the traffic
and the flooding problems. He stated
he would request they made sure that
Fox Hollow Lane is made a collector
street and also that the property
drains properly.
Mr. Dan Patterson, 6445 Sudbury Way,
came forward. Mr. Patterson asked
what was in the Master Plan in regard
to Little Ranch Road or Fox Hollow
Lane to alleviate the traffic
congestion.
Mr. Bronstad stated they have been
taling about Conett Blvd. for several
years, but don't know when the Council
will approve the work on Watauga Road,
they have not set a target date yet.
Page 36
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
Mr. Bronstad stated right now they are
working on Phase II of Rufe Snow
Drive.
Chairman Tucker said there is both an
east-west and a north-south
thoroughfare in the Master Plan, but
that is all the information he has to
give; it is up to the Council to put
them into the fiscal year's budget and
fund those plans.
Mr. Patterson said he felt they are
getting the cart ahead of the horse,
and that we need the streets now
before the development.
Chairman Tucker said it takes time to
build streets.
Mr. Kimmell stated their plans now are
to develop in four phases. He stated
when Little Ranch Road is opened up to
Chapman Drive, it would giv~ these
people in North Park another outlet.
Chairman Tucker asked what his
projection of time was.
Mr. Kimmell said about two years.
A man living at 7235 Sandhurst came
forward. He stated he was against
Little Ranch Road being made a
thoroughfare. He stated unless you
releave the traffic problem on Watauga
Road and Rufe Snow, you are still
going to have a problem. He stated
his only concern about this develop-
ment was the traffic, getting in and
out of the area.
Mr. Roy Hodo, 6724 Mabell, came
forward. Mr. Hodo asked if the green
area shown was for 1,500 square foot
homes.
Mr. Kimmell stated it was.
Mr. Hodo asked where the drive
approaches would be.
Page 37
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
Mr. Kimmell stated they would be off
Chapman Road.
Mr. Hodo said Chapman Road is
unbearable at its best and now this
plan is to have cars backing out onto
Chapman Road. He stated the street is
full of chug holes; when it rains
Chapman Road floods, and nothing has
been addressed about this problem.
Mr. Hodo said when you add this many
houses you have not provided any exits
to get out of the area; you will just
be congesting the area more. Mr. Hodo
stated he understands the streets are
the City Council's problem, but if the
City Council is not meeting the needs
of providing entrances and exits of
the area.
Chairman Tucker said he wanted to
explain that in a zoning request, we
consider the best use of the land and
we get to the next request, the
platting, that is when the roads, the
drainage, and how the cars drive in
and out will be discussed. He stated
we can give them the zoning and deny
the plat if the roads are not laid out
properly or the drainage is not
sufficient.
Mr. Hodo stated he would wait for the
platting request. Mr. Hodo asked if
this area was in the flood plane.
Chairman Tucker said it was not.
Chairman Tucker closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Bowen stated he was concerned
about square footage. Mr. Bowen
stated he understood the need for
smaller lots, but he was concerned
about the number of 1,200 square foot
homes. Mr. Bowen asked if they would
be willing to change their ratio some.
He stated he would be able to think
more favorable on this if it was more
proportional.
L
Page 38
P & Z Minutes
May 26, 1983
PZ 83-40
APPROVED
,., ~~I
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
16.
PS 83-44
Mr. Kimmell stated he had no objection
to working out a compromise. He
stated he would prefer the 1,200
square feet, but he would be willing
to change his proposed 1,200 to 1,300
square feet for the entire addition.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PZ 83-40 with the stipulation that a
change be made in the request from
1F-8-1200 to 1F-8-1300. This motion
was seconded by Ms. Nash and the
motion carried 4-0.
...wø._.~-,_..--:¡-·¡;'Ot "'~r""·-~r-c-'~~"'.r.S~"1:¡:'':(J...~·''''''~~:a~'""ø:¡...~~
The Chairman called a recess
P.M.
The Chairman called the meeting
to order at 11:30 P.M. with t~ same
b ~
mem ers present. /
/'-
Kimmel}¡!Trustee, for
of CMpman Ridge
/
r-'
Request of Frank
preliminary plat
Addition.
"
Mr. Kimmell camec:tforward. Mr. Kimmell
stated he had;r~ceived the City
Engineer's ~équests and had responded
to these ié~ms. Mr. Kimmell said
Items 1,o't'hru 4 had been agreed to and
have ~ê~n added to the drawing;
regªfding item #5, he met with the
own~r of the property to the east,
~~rk Collins, the proposed Central
~ffpark Addition, to confirm that he had
./-" no objection to the concentrated storm
r¿' water discharge point as shown on the
¡II drainage layout. He stated they felt
f~ they could reach a satisfactory
51 conclusion. Mr. Kimmell stated one
fro alternative, if all else failed, was
~
I~ to take the drainage out of the
~~ easterly cul-de-sacs down the east
-f/" side of the property into the drainage
R"
/ easement. He stated Mr. Hannon
/~J addressed that more clearly in his
.~ letter to you dated May 25th.
/i'
,,1"
,¢
/~'
,ç-'
/1:<' ~
//
/'
/
T
Mr. Kimmell said on item U6, they had
made that change; #7 regarding the
grading on the proposed Priddy Lane,
that he said it could possibly be too
flat, but when we do the final
engineering, if it is too flat, we
will meet the City's criteria.
1'..A~,~
__~JY2.4>~",-,.-..=--,;;;a~-'::''!:II'.x:r:a."1~::7Ç'-.=.n::.z7~~=~:'r;r.''~.r-=-~~'r"".%:''I.'''~~~sr~~-"",
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth-Dallas
April 27, 1983
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subj ect:
3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-40,
AG TO IF-9 & IF-8, GRID 77, 78, 86, 87
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that
we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
ßac»-w. ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.' BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021' 817/283-6211' METRO/267-3367
DATE: 7-18-83
\ (,
\ ' \
\
SUBJECT :.
Resolution for Pretreatment Program of Wastewater
DEP ARTMENT :
Utility
BACKGROUND:
Several months ago there was some correspondence in the Council packets
relating to the requirements to have an industrial pretreatment program. This
resolution is part of that requirement.
At this time I do not believe we have industry that falls in the category
requiring a permit. The Trinity River Authority will aS$i'st us with the
inspections.
~--~.._---~
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approve resolution for Pretreatment Program of Wastewater
..---.--
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES N/ A
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: -L.
-----------------------------~--------------------------------------------------
DATE:
7-18-83
SUBJECT:, Amendment to the Conttact with the Trinity River Authority
DEPARTMENT: Utility.
BACKGROUND: This pertains to the Pretreatment Program of Wastewater ~
and is
part of our contract with Trinity River Authority requiring pretreatment of certain
industrial waste.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approve amendment to the contract with T~~.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES N/A
NO
N/A
:::::::_::::::~----------~----~~----------------------------------.--.
«
Ira
.
Trinity River Authority of Texas
Northern Region Office
301-1411
June 21, 1983
Mr. Allen Bronstad
Assistant Public Works
and Utility Director
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Mr. Bronstad:
As you are aware, the Authority is conti nui ng to develop a pretreatment
program that will regulate industrial users in the CRWS service area. In
order to obtain EPA approval of this program, the Authority must demonstrate
that it has adequate legal authority to insure compliance with all
pretreatment program requirements. The Environmental Protection Agency,
Region VI, has agreed that this demonstration can be accomplished through the
execution of a contract amendment with the Authority's customer cities.
Accordi ngly, we have enclosed a proposed contract amendment (Attachment 1),
which incl udes all of the provisions needed for EPA approval of the CRWS
pretreatment program. If the proposed contract amendment is sati sfactory,
the following steps should be taken to provide the Authority with
documentation required for pretreatment program approval by EPA:
1. execute contract amendment;
2. revi se City Ordi nance as needed to carryout provi si ons of the
contract amendment;
3. obtain Council resolution endorsing the pretreatment program (see
example, Attachment 2);
4. obtain statement from City Attorney indicating that City has adequate
legal authority to implement provisions of the contract amendment and
identifying how the City plans to enforce compliance; and
5. provide Authority with copies of items 1 thru 4.
Some of the CRWS customer cities have indicated that they plan to do all of
the things required in the pretreatment program, whereas others have
indicated that they prefer for the Authority to perform many of these
responsibilities. In this regard EPA has requested (see Attachment 3), that
each customer city provide a write-up indicating how each city plans to
implement provisions of the attached contract amendment, what city staff will.
be available to work on the program, and how the city's effort will be
funded.
p,o_ Box 240
Arlington, Texas 76010
(817) Metro 467-4223
..
Please let me know if you have any questions concerning this request or if
you would like to meet to discuss any of the items requested.
Sincerely,
&Pi~
Bill Smith
Manager, Administrative
and Technical Services
BS/skm
Enclosures
Trinity River Authority of Texas
Northern Region Office
311 0.500
July 5, 1983
Mr. Allen Bronstad
Director of Utilities
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Allen:
Subject: Central Regional Wastewater System
Pretreatment Regulation
Amendatory Wastewater Contracts
By letter dated June 21, 1983, I submitted several documents concerning the
Pretreatment Program for the Central Regional Wastewater System. Included
in this submission was an Amendatory Wastewater Service Contract to be executed
by each respective Customer City. This document represented "Attachment 1" of
my June 21 letter.
It was recently brought to my attention that this document is incorrect as far
as numbering or lettering of certain paragraphs of said document. In order to
correct this situation, I have made the necessary corrections and enclosed you
will find a complete document which should replace the Amendatory Contract pre-
viously submitted to you. The corrections involve the lettering of certain
para~raphs and have not affected any of the Amendatory Contract language. These
correcti,ons make the Amendment compatible with the existing Contract.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you in dealing with this
matter. If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
&tt¿~
BILL R. SMITH
Manager, Administrative
and Technical Services
Ivtd
Attachment
P.O, Box 249
Arlington, Texas 76010
(817) 467-4223
RESOLUTION NO. R-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF . TEXAS
ENDORSING THE mPLEt1ENTATION OF A CONTINUING
PRETREAH1ENT PROGRAM AS REQUI RED BY 40 CFR 403
FOR THE CENTRAL REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM.
Preamble
WHEREAS, on June 26. 1978, the United States Environmental Protection
Agency published a rule (Amended January 28, 1981) which established mech-
anisms and procedures for enforcing National Pretreatment Standards con-
trolling the introduction of wastes from non-domestic sources into Pub-
licly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs); and
WHEREAS, this rule, 40 CFR 403, requires that a Pretreatment Program
be developed for the Central Regional Wastewater System; and
WHEREAS. the Trinity River Authority of Texas, as the owner and operator
of a POTW, must comply with rule 40 CFR 403; and
WHEREAS, the City, as a contracting party of the Central Regional
Wastewater System. has entered into an Amendatory Wastewater Contract
with the Trinity River Authority of Texas whereby the City has enacted
ordinances that are necessary to implement and enforce the National Pre-
treatment Standards; and
WHEREAS, 40 CFR 403.9(b) requires a statement or resolution reflecting
the endorsement or approval of the local boards or councils responsible for
supervising and/or funding the POTW~
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF
That the City of hereby endorses
the implementation of a pretreatment pro9ram
as required by 40 CFR 403 for the Central Re-
gional Wastewater System with such program to
continue as long as 40 CFR 403 remains in effect.
Mayor, City of
ATTEST:
AMENDATORY WASTEWATER SERVICE CONTRACT
STATE OF TEXAS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY
OF TEXAS
CONTRACT AMENDMENT
WHEREAS,- the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, (the "City") has duly
executed and entered into a CONTRACT dated as of the 28th day of May, 1975,
with the Trinity River Authority of Texas (the "Authority") providing for
wastewater servi ce to the Ci ty (the "CONTRACT"), to whi ch CONTRACT reference
is hereby made for all purposes; and
WHEREAS, on June 26, 1978, the Uni ted States Envi ronmental Protecti on
Agency published a rule (Amended January 28, 1981) which established
mechanisms and procedures for enforcing National Pretreatment Standards
controlling the introduction of wastes from non-domestic sources into Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTWs); and
WHEREAS, thi s rul e, 40 CFR 403, requi res that a Pretreatment Program be
developed for the Central Regional Wastewater System; and
WHEREAS, the Authority, as the operator of a POTW, must comply with rule
40 CFR 403; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary that Sections 1, 4, and 8 of the CONTRACT
dated May 28, 1975, be amended.
NOW, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises
contained herein, the City and Authority agree as follows:
THAT Section 1.01 of the CONTRACT is hereby amended to include the
following definitions:
(bb) Industrial User (IU) - Any person, including but not limited to, any
individual firm, partnership, corporation, association, municipality,
or any other 1 egal enti ty, who di scharges or desi res to di scharge
industrial wastes to the Central Regional Wastewater System~
(cc) POTW - Publicly Owned Treatment Works as defined in 40 CFR 403.
(dd) Significant Industrial User (SIU) - Any industrial user who is
connected or desires to connect to the City's domestic wastewater
collection system and meets at least one of the following criteria:
(i) Average industri al wastewater di scharge rate greater than 50,000
gpd.
(ii) BOD and/or suspended solids concentrations in industrial waste-
water greater than 250 mg/l .
(iii) Industrial category regulated by National Pretreatment Standards
as promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency.
(ee) Total Toxic Organics - The sum of all detected concentrations greater
than 10 micrograms per 1 iter for all organic compounds classified as
priority pollutants by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency.
THAT Section 4.03(a), of the CONTRACT is deleted and the following
1 anguage substituted therefor:
To enabl e the hi ghest degree of treatment in the most economical manner
possible, and to comply with Federal and State regulations, certain solids,
1 i qui ds and gases are hereby prohi bi ted from enteri ng Authori ty I s System in
excess of standards as set by sai d Federal and State regul ati ons. The
prohibitive discharges listed below shall apply at the Points of Entry.
Federal and state regulatory agencies periodically modify standards on
prohibitive discharges; therefore, revision to, additions to, or deletions
from the items listed in this section will become necessary to comply with
these latest standards. It is the intention of this CONTRACT that prohibitive
discharge requirements be reviewed periodically by Authority and revised 'in
accordance with the latest standards of any federal or state agency having
regul atory powers. Any requi red revi si ons shall be made and wri tten notice
thereof given to the City. City shall be responsible for integrating such
changes into the local industrial waste ordinance and notifying all affected
users of the change within ninety (90) days following written notice to the
City of such change.
THAT Section 403(c)(x) of the CONTRACT is deleted and the following
language substituted therefor:
(x) Any wastes or waters exceeding the concentrations listed below:
Poll utant
Maximum Allowable
Concentration (mg/l)
Ant i mony
Arsenic
Ba ri urn
Beryl 1 i urn
Bismuth
Boron
Cadmium
Chromi urn (total)
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanides
Fl uori des
Hydrogen Sulfide
lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Ni ekel
Phenol
Selenium
Si 1 ver
Tin
Uranyl -Ion
Zinc
Cyanides or Cyanogen Compounds
(capable of liberating hydrocyanic
gas on acidification)
Total Toxi c Organi cs
0.010
0.100
2.000
0.010
0.500
1.000
0.100
3.500
1.000
2.500
1.000
1.500
0.100
2.000
3.500
0.005
1. '000
1.500
0.005
0.020
0.100
1.000
5.000
2.500
0.200
1. 000
THAT Secti on 4.06 of the CONTRACT is hereby del eted and the foll owi ng
language substituted therefor:
Section 4.06. INDUSTRIAL WASTES. The effects of certain types of
Industri al Waste upon Wastewater and Wastewater treatment processes are such
as to requi re that careful consi derati on be made of each i ndustri al
connect ion. Thi s is a matter of concern both to Authority and to City. The
Ci ty covenants that it wi 11 have in effect and wi 11 enforce an i ndustri al
waste ordinance acceptable to Federal and State agencies or departments having
1 awful juri sdi ct i on to set standards ,\or waste di scharges. Thi s ordi nance
will include both but not be limited to the following provisions:
(a) For each existing and future SIU, the City shall require said user to
compl ete and submit a permi t appl i cati on contai ni ng that i nformati on
specified in the attached sample application (Exhibit 1). The
Authority shall be provided a copy of the permit application within
thi rty days after recei pt by City. Authority shall provi de comments
on said application within thirty days of receipt and return comments
to City. Failure to comment within thirty days of receipt of the
application shall be construed as concurrence by Authority.
After approval of the permit appl ication by both City and Authority,
the Ci ty may issue a permi t to di scharge whi ch shall be as shown on
Exhibi t 2. Sai d permit to di scharge shall be requi red of all SIUs
before sai d user wi 11 be allowed to di scharge i ndustri a1 wastes into
the sewage system. A copy of the permit to discharge shall be
forwarded to the Authority.
(b) The City shall require SIUs to comply with applicable Federal
Categori cal Pretreatment Standards as well as any appl i cab 1 e state and
local standards.
(c) The City shall maintain certain information contained in permit
applications as confidential at SIU's request.
(d) The City shall di sall ow dil uti on as a means of reduci ng poll utant
concentrations in an SIU's waste stream.
(e) The City shall be authorized to enter SIU premises at any time for
independent monitoring, inspection, or review of applicable records to
determine compl iance.
(f) The City shall develop and require adherence to SIU compliance
schedules.
(g) The City shall require sel f-monitoring and reporting at SlUts expense.
(h) The City shall choose or approve laboratory to analyze industrial
wastes.
(i) The City shall require SIU's to pay applicable fees for:
(i) sampling and testing to determine compliance
(ii) disconnection/reconnection of service resulting from non-
compliance
(iii) abnormal strength wastes
(iv) additional costs incurred by City or POTW in transporting or
treating wastes
(v) filing, revision, or renewal of permit application
(j) The City shall provide public notification for instances of violation.
(k) The City shall deny/revoke permit, di sall oW/di sconnect servi ce,
assess civil or criminal penalties, and seek other available legal
and equitable remedies against SIU for:
(i) discharge to sewerage system resulting in violation of POTW's
discharge permit conditions
(i i) haza rd to health or 1 He of POTW personnel or users of recei vi ng
waters
(iii) violation of any applicable ordinance or regulation
(iv) false information transmitted to approving authority through
permit application, monitoring reports, etc.
The Ci ty shall furni sh to the Authori ty all documents and records, in
addition to those outlined herein, as necessary to demonstrate compliance
by all industries.
All provisions contained herein are in addition to those contained in the
CONTRACT entered into between the parti es dated May 28, 1975. These
Amendments and the original CONTRACT, except those provisions in the
original CONTRACT which have been specifically deleted, shall be construed
as ~ single agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto acti ng under authority of thei r
respect i ve governi ng bodi es have caused thi s Amendatory Wastewater Servi ce
Contract to be duly executed in several counterparts, each of which shall
constitute an original, all as of the day of , 19~
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS
ATTEST:
DANNY F. VANCE, General Manager
GERI ELLIOTT, Secretary
(SEAL)
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
SECRET AR Y
(SEAL)
EXHIBIT 1
PROPOSED PERMIT APPLICATION FORM WITH COVER LETTER
CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS
Date:
To: Signi ficant Industrial Users
From:
Subject: Application for a Permit to Discharge Industrial Wastewaters to the
Sanitary Sewer System.
Ordinance number has been adopted for the purpose of regulating the
qual ity of industrIal wastewaters contributed to the sanitary sewer. The
objectives of the Ordinance are to prevent damage or obstruction to the sewer,
to avoid interference with the regional wastewater treatment plant operated by
the Trinity River Authority, and to comply with state and federal regulations
regarding pretreatment of industrial wastes.
Significant industrial users must obtain a Permit to discharge industrial
wastewaters to the sewer. The Permit authorizes your discharge and sets forth
criteria for discharge quality and requirements for reporting.
The attached appl ication for a Permit must be completed and returned to the
mailing address shown below within 180 days. A fee of must
accompany this Application. The City and the Trinity River Authority will
review your application. Additional information such as evidence of
treatability may be requested from either entity. The City will return a
Permit to you upon approva I of your app I i cat i on and wil I ei ther approve or
deny said application within gO days of its receipt by City.
Please address questions concerning the Industrial Wastewater Ordinance Permit
to:
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PERMIT TO DISCHARGE INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATERS
TO THE SANITARY SEWER
Name of Industry (Permittee)
Address
(location of sewer servlce)
Permit No.
Account No.
The above named Permittee is authorized to discharge industrial wastewaters to
the sanitary sewerage system according to the provisions of this Permit.
Authorization is granted for a period beginning
until
,
AuthorIzed Representatlve Date
City of North Richland Hills
EXHIBIT 2 (CONT'D)
A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
The quality of permittee's industrial discha'rges will be limited by the
provisions of City Ordinance No. and the National Pretreatment
Regulations which include the followIng numerical limitations:
Pollutant or
Pollutant Property
Maximum Allowable
Concentration, mgll
STANDARDS
Average Concentration
and/or Load
mg/1 or I b/day
The discharge of any pollutant at a level in excess of that identified and
authorized by this permit, sha11 constitute a violation of the terms and
conditions of this permit. Such a vioJation may result in permit
revocation and/or the imposition of civil and/or criminal penalties.
B. MONITORING AND REPORTING
1. Permittee shall collect representative samples of the wastewater
discharge and analyze these waters for the pollutants indicated in
Section A. Where feasible, samples shall be obtained using flow
proportional composite sampling techniques specified in the applicable
Categorical Pretreatment Standard. Where composite sampling is not
feasible, grab sampling is acceptable. The permittee sha11 collect
and analyze sample(s) during a period.
(number) (interval)
2. Permittee shall sUllll1arize monitoring information on a copy of the
attached "Significant Industrial User Self Monitoring Report" form.
Dupl icates of this form shall be submitted during the months of
and of each year to:
City Engineer
City of North Rlchland HIlls
with copy to:
Pretreatment Program Manager
Trinity River Authority of Texas
P. O. Box 240
Arlington, Texas 76010
"'Í
.--
DATE:
7-18-83
SUBJECT~ Partial Payment #1 - Rufe Snow Drive Phase II
DEPARTMENT: Publi.c Works
BACKGROUND:
This is partial payment #l on the Rufe Snow project. The contractor
has done 'quite a bit of work on the north end concerning moving of dirt and
things of this nature. They are starting to build the_bypass road.,
Although he was a little slow in getting started on this pro;ect.
he is moving along quite well except for the days it rained.
---~-
.'-.,.. -.-.-.-
_.- --.-.-.
CITY COUNCIL AC,!ION REQUIRED: Approve partial pAyment in th~ ;::¡mnnnLof $L.h,]]7 73 to---...---
Austin Road Co.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES X
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: G. O. Bonds
-------------~~---------------------------_.:.-_----------------~------
/
KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
Jul y 14, 1983
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-218, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RUFE SNOW DRIVE, PHASE II,
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.1
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.1, dated
July 7, 1983, made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of $46,117.73,
for materials furnished and work perfonned on the referenced project as of
June 30, 1983.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your
represerltative, Bill Rutledge, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and
we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment in amount of $46,117.73, be made to Austin Road
Co. at P.O. Box 2285. Fort Worth, Texas 76113.
Along with a copy of thi s 1 etter, the Contractor is be i ng fu rni shed a
blank estimate fonn for preparing next month's estimate.
f2tv~ ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road
~Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
/ /1r. Bill Rutledge, City Inspector
Mrs. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.' BEDFORD. TEXAS 7602'·8'7/263-62"· METR0/267-3367
DATE:
7-18-83
r~' /
SUBJECT. Partial Payment #5 - Snow Heights Street & Drainage Project
DEPARTMENT : Public. Works
BACKGROUND: This project is ahead of schedule and by the time you receive this
there should be some asphalt layed on Holiday Lane and possibly on Vance Rd.
,..-.. "-----
~------
---.--.- -----
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve partial payment in the amount of $120,972.68
to Austin Road Company .
._------
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES X
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
General Obligation Bonds
----------------~--~--------------------- -------------------~-----_. ...
,.~.......... ""'·n.'
.... '0
" ......~.. '~_'.~ '_"'--"~..'. >~,; .,"~_",___~""",~.",,,,,,,-,,,,,,¡,.,,,,,,,,,-,,,,-,._~_""__~..-,,,,,-,"....,,,,_,,,~.,,.,,,,,--____,,,,,.__,,,,,,_____,____,. ,.......,_""'...... "..__. '_~""__'_~on~_. ',-,,"_ .
.---....- '.~.._-
~_....._.,._:---_._-,----- .....--~~..-
~
.
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
Jul y 14, 1983
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-326, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
SNOW HEIGHTS STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS,
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.5, dated
July 1, 1983. made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of $120.972.68,
for material s furni shed and work perfonned on the referenced project as of
June 30, 1983.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your
representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and
we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment in amount of $120,972.68, be made to Austin Road
Co. at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113.
Along with a copy of this letter, the ~ontractor is being furnished a
blank estimate fonn for preparing next month1s estimate.
~tW-W, ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: r~r. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road
~Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
/ Mr. Floyd McCall urn, Ci ty Ins pector
Mrs. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
p,:u
DATE:
7-21-83
- SUBJECT:.
Partial Pay Estimate-# 6 - North Hills Street and Drainage
DEPARTMENT: Public,Works
BACKGROUND: Contractor is making his final manhole and valve box adjustments
and if not· already started, should start very soon with the final course of
asphalt on these streets. We do plan to impose the liquidateddama~e clauRe
on this contractor.
..-.--.-...-.--.--..----
---- -.-
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
of $186,433.14.
Approve payment to Stolaruk C9rporation in the amount
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES X
NO
ACCOUNT _NUMBER~bl~-------------------~-------------------------
-------------- -------- - ----
- -
II
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, 1 NC.
CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 20, 1983
Honorable Mayor and City Counci1
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E.Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-325, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
NORTH HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS,
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.6
,-
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.6, dated
July 20, 1983, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation, in the amount of
$186,433.14, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of June 30, 1983.
The quantities and condit;~n of the project have been verified on-site
_ by your representative, Bill Rutledge, as :indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
-
We recommend that this payment, in amount_of $186.433.14, be made to
Stolaruk Corporation at P. O. Box 61587, Dallas, Texas 75261. .
So
We would note that the Contractor has exceeded the scheduled completion
date of July 7, 1983. Please see Item 3.2.12, page 3.2.6, "Contract Time
and Liquidated Damages" and Item 3.1.04, (a), page 3.1.4, regarding
IIExtension of Time" in the Contract Documents.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor ;s being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
£L-~-u/ ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
R\~A/l j c
Enclosure
cc: t~r. Rodger N. Line, City I\\anager
Mr. Ronald T. Jones, Stolaruk Corp.
~Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
t~r. Bill Rutledge, City Inspector
Ms. Lou Spi egel, Di rector of Finance
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
__ _ . ,'.. ~, ....,.. _ Q¡:-I"\~(')~D TEXAS 76021.817/263-6211' METRO/267-3367
DATE:
7-21-83
~~
- SUBJECT:,
Partial Pay Estimate #5 - Holiday North Street and Drainage Improvements
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: As you can see from the small amount of this payment, they.· are·- maid n~ vpr~1aw
on this project also. Just this week they replaced the curb and gutter on
Cummings Drive and should be able to start paving that street probably in the next week
or so. After Cummings Drive they should move to Mary Francis St. and Randle Dr;vp
and get those two completed and we should have this contractor out of town
-,---.- .--.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
of $19.788.30.
Approve payment to Stol;:¡rnk C;orp.o.r;:¡r; on , n r}¡e atlloun-t------
-_.-._.' ._---
BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO
::::_:::~---_:;;;:~~------------------------------------------------
_11--:
'-
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGiNEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
Jul y 20. 1983
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-328t CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTSt
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.5, dated
July 20, 1983, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation. in the amount of
$19,788.30, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of June 30, 1983.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site
by your representative, Bill Rutledge, as indicated by signature on the
estimate. and we have checkëd the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment, in amount ~f $19,788.30, be made to
Stola.ruK. Corporatiort at.P.. 0., Box 61581~ Dallas, Texas 7526-1.
Also enclosed is a copy of a "Notice of Un~paid Bills" submitted h1' one
of the Contractor's suppl i ers, "Trans- Tex -Supply Company". Final- payment
to the Contractor should be withheld until all unpaid bills are resolved.
(See Item 5.08, page G-10, "Payments Withheld", in the General Conditions).
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
;e¡~w ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWAjljc
En clos u re
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City t~anager
Mr. Ronald T. Jones. Stolaruk Corp.
~Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Bill Rutledget City Inspector
Ms. Lou Spiegel t Director of Finance
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Wòrks
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.' BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021·817/283-62\\· METRO/267-3367
DATE:
7-11-83
--I
~BJECT~ Street Sweenin~ Contract
DEPARTMENT: Public, Works
BACKGROUND: On .Tune 30. 1983. at 10:00 A.M. bids for the above mentioned service
were oDene'd and are broken down as follows: (4 bid sets mailed. 2 were returned)
ExceDtions Total Bid
Moore Industries 0 Cást Der curb mile $32.00 $38,400
SCA Services of Ft. Worth 0 " " " " $14.75 $17,700
The above proposals are based on cleaning 100 curb miles pet month with the oPtion
of Mr. Riddle adding or deleting curb miles as needed. This will enable City Staff
to clean problem streets more often if needed and delete areas that do not demand
monthly cleaning. Mr. Riddle and I believe at $14.75 per curb mile, it presents the
most cost effective and efficient solution to our street cleaning problem without
adding more equipment.and additional personnel.
The amount budgeted for this project is $35,000.
'--~---'"
-'-.-' - . -
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove awarding a cont~t to SCA Servjce~
of Ft. Worth in the amount of $17.700: 'with an option of Çi~~Staff being ~]]oweñ to
increase said contract UP to an amount not to exceed $35,00Q.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
x
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 01-60-04-4260
--~~~~~r-----------------------------------------------·---.-- -. . .
SCA SERVICES OF FORT WORTH
AN SCA SERVICES COMPANY
P.O. Box 7616
"ort Worth. Texas 76111
j17) 838-6805
~
SCA
SERVICES
June 30, 1983
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
Gentlemen:
SCA Services of Texas, Inc. is pleased for this opportunity to respond
to the request for the proposal distributed by the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas for the cle~ning of the City streets.
We believe our company can offer- the City a well-defined, efficient and
effective solution to your street cleaning problem and at the same time,
present the_most cost effective approach available to the City. Our
company, because of its long-standing position in the community, fully _
understands the requirements of the City and is_uniquely equipped to meet
those requirements. As a wholly owned subsidiary of SCA Services, Inc .-,
the overall financial and managerial strength of a nationwide organization
stands behind our proposal.
SCA Services of Texas, Inc. 1S absolutely sure of its ability to provide
quality service to the City of North Richland Hills. We would welcome
the opportunity to meet with City representatives for a technical dis-
cussion that would demonstrate that ability.
Sincerely,
SCA Services of Texas, Inc.
~~ C ¡&~
Chester C. Jackson
Assistant Secretary
srlCCJ
"ALWAYS AT YOUR DISPOSAL"
.
, ,
PROPOSAL FOR STREET SWEEPING
I.
A. The City of North Richland Hills is accepting proposals for the cleaning
of the City streets.
B. The City has approximately 100 curb miles to be cleaned, and the cleaning
schedule shall be that lOO curb miles are cleaned each montht or lt200
curb miles per year.
II.
A.
The City of North Richland-Hills
or delete curb miles as needed.
govern.
reserves the right to add curb miles
In any event, the unit bid prices shall
B. Failure by the contractor to make reasonable progress as and when
requested shall entitle the Purchasing Agent to acquire quantities
from alternate sources, with _the right to seek reimbursement from the
contractor for amountst if any, paid by the City of North Richland Hills
over and above the bid prices.
C. Regardless of the award of a contract hereu~der, the City of North
Richland Hills retains the right to purchase the same or similar
services or work from other sources should it be determined that doîng
so would be in the City of North Richland Hills best interest, based on
cost and quality considerations; however, in such event, the contractor
will be given the first option of meeting or rejecting the proposed
alternate source's lower price or higher quality.
D. The City of North Richland Hills will have available at no charge to
the vendor storage space for approximately three (3) sweepers.
E. Item "D" will be allowed so-long as said sweepers are used solely for
the cleaning of the City streets of North Richland Hills.
F. The Contract will be awarded at the prices bid for a period of approximately
one year.
G. The quality and workmanship shall be the sole responsibility of the Vendor.
The Director of Public Works or his designate shall have the right of
final inspectiont and their decision shall be final.
III.
I
Vendor shall supply the following information:
1. Number of sweepers vendor proposes to use: One
2. Type of sweeper to be used:
TYMCO 600
_.~~~...t..,¡,..,
.r~ ,
3. Supply 24 hour Emergency clean up serVice, SCA Services of Texas, Inc.cp
(initial)
4. Length of time to clean one curb mile: 15-30 Minutes
5. Cost per curb mile: $14.75
6. Cost per year: '$17.100
, -
7.
Vendor shall submit a cleaning schedule SCA Services of Texas, Inc.(.1~
(ini tial) T
Vendor shall be responsible for the dumping and storage òf their
own waste material - SCA Services of Texas" Inc æ
(initial) T
8.
IV.
The City of North Richland Hills has for inspection a map outlining the
streets to be done and their location.
SCA Services of Texas, Inc.
6100 Ellíott Reeder Road
Fort Worth, Texas 76111
By: ~e~~
Chester C. Jacks~
Assistant Secretary
_")o.ó.oN;o....;...: _~.
.',
. ,
GENERAL CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
"be wi thdra~ prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have. been opened)
and the bidder, in submitting the same) ~arrants and guarantees that his
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and-free of mistakes and that such bid ~ill not and cannot
be withdra~ because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloudt the proposals
will be tabulat~d for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City Gf North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to ~aive
technicalities) and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work othe~Tise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3. IRREGU~ PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of -formt additions, or conditions not calle~ fort una~thorized
alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the ,right "to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the "City of North Richland Hills.
4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposalst and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejectedt among other reasonst for any of the follo~ing
specific reasons:
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced valùe of any items.
(d) ìlnere the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
...~..~.........:...:-........
5. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
Bidder~ may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons. for any of the follo~ing specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidderJ any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Rich1and Hi11st or where such litigation'is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted -on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as reyea1ed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work ~hich in thè judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded. '
6. Av.IARD OF CONTRACT
A~ard of contract, if it be awarded, ~il1 be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the propõsal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to toe responsiþilities of the low bidders. -
7. ASSIGNMENT
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an a'-lard '-lithout the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Mañager! Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8. NOTICE OF DELAYS
Whenever the vendor-encounters any difficulty '-lhich is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information '-lith
respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
'-laiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to '-lhich
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such noticeJ however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9. B~~D NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only '-lhen a "br'and name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
_.~-",~:.:~
.\ ,
(a) If items for which bids have 'been called for have been identified by ,
a "brand name or- equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictivet and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determ~ned by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects' to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" productt his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
..',.;.~~..~...~
DATE:
7-21-83
/) -
C"i0
- SUBJECT :.
Walker Branch Drainaie Improvpmpnt~
DEPARTMENT :
Public, Works
BACKGROUND:
We' now have a] 1 thp p;:: ~pmpnt~ T.TP nppñ lip on thp IIpppr pnñ t'\'F
Walker Branch drainage and channel and we will be able to improve thp ~h;:: nnp'
down to the Helms' property. The Helms' uroperty is located ahont 100 fppt
downstream on the main channel, from Richland OakR.
The low bidder is about $55.000 to $60,000 ¡¡ndpr thp pnginppr'c: øc:t;~<>tø
~---
-----'---...
_.-,-- - -..-.--
CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approve the bid of MA Vinson Conß..tru..Çj;_ion Co. in thp
amount of $455,840.19.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES X
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
General Obligation Bonds
-----------------_:.._------------------------------------------- --- - --- --- ------------.-.- ,. -' .
·
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
July 20, 1983
Honorable Mayor & City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-323, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
WALKER'S BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
In accordance with your instructions, bids were received today on the refer..
enced project. This project includes earthen channel improvements on the
main Walker's Branch Channel from the Robert Chapman property to Harwood Road,
and earthen channel improvements on the tributary channel from the junction of
the main channel to Jerrie Jo Drive. Also included in this contract is concrete
channel liner construction on the tributary channel from Jerrie Jo to Harwood
with concrete box culvert improvements at Jerrie Jo and Jennings Drive.
The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review.
indicates, bids were received from six (6) contractors. Upon
we found only minor extension errors which did not change the
the three low bidders, as correctly shown on the tabulation.
As the tabulation
checking the bids
relationship of
On the basis of the bids submitted, we would recommend that the Contract be
awarded to M.A. Vinson Construction Company, in the amount of $455,840.19,
for a total time bid of 240 calendar days. The engineer's estimate for this
project was $517,500.00.
We will be present at the July 25, 1983, Council meeting to answer any questions
you may have concerning this project.
Rduw, ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l jc
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
/Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mrs. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG" BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
~~~º~~~~~~~~~~~~g~g~~~~~~~~~5
~33~~-' nowO~o~ m ~~«n<~<~n
tJ)OO«"'CIOCDO::Jorooro--4nc.......oc.....o ~.u:::;¡. (""t'........
~«roro........_.tJ) tJ)""1 ~oroaroon ~,~
'""'5 CD ro '""'5 , ro Q.I tJ) \J ....... -C ... -0 =.....:::3::) ""1 C I"T1 rr1 n ÇlQ Q.I QQ 0 tn
c..... rtc+ V1c+V'J v>onn::s-c-,-ortXXS:: ........ ---Ill)
n -0;0 ........ _. ........ ................ = 7" ....... V1 ....... U') ....... ....J. ........ 0 --' a ---i .......
rt ;0 ;0 ;0 ;:0 -" ~ Q.I.. 0" :::S.. :::I ........ m ........ (I Vl c.n < ....... VI ....... ro -t¡
roro~Q.I~ro3 :::I n ~nn~ oc+~rotn tn~"""·-
;z-a "'C ....... -I, CD ro "'0 n n ---I n 3: 0 C tJ) n c..... n:=s . ""5 ""0 -+.""0 ([)--t
('[)--"--I--'---I -0" ---1(.1)--'1 --';Þ:::S-s --'0-..1(") c+' o· aQ..1"T1
::e:: Q,I QJ -........ n Q,I c+ OJ . n (") c:r 0 c:u.. . '"'1 n n .., ([) 3:
nn~~cz........tJ),tJ)~ . -stn rooo~o o:=sn
..þ.(þ (DtCc.c -'O::S lJ') C tJ) (þ =...... øo-,·tJ) n =r+::3::S -+.(""")-1,1./) =ro
_ < --' n n --t¡ ::Þ 0 0 < ~ n ro n n n c: -. ØI rr'I
:c: po Ro ð' S- ~ ~ :-- ~ Ë þ' .. =., J. oo~ ~-c .. = 0 ;:Ó' g ~ ~ Çi~ 5 ~
....... (/) V> VI n c+ =""1 = c.n -0 < = - . -s c+ n n ....I. fD""" ro:::o
~ ~ ~ ~ g ;0 ~ Ri' -n ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ Û) ~ ï1 ....... 6 :Þ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --' ~
n g g -s~. ~ ~ ~.. Q1' ~ ~ ~ ~.g 0 ::s ª ~ ~ Cí rtr· ::E:' g ~;:j
::r n n """0 --' . 3 t-I ::1 :1 CD.. c+. ~"""O (t) ;;r ...... ~ c..... .-I. c..... ::J n 0
QJ~~ ---1....1. v>ro~3 3:::3 ro ro---l~~< xro~ro~Q.lZ
_. QJ:=Sï1c+~nro ro~""""''''''''ü' ---,romro:::lCD,3<
::s .þ 0'\ c-+(.Q.-I. ---I --' a. a. :::S":::I .. n rt ~ C Q;I ::J ::::s ~ CD Q;I
{'þ -'. Cï' :::0 (') Cï 0 OJ (""t- c.. .....I. .....I. .....I. :::J c+
tn ;+ g;7:J g b' ~ :-' ~ 3 g ~ ~ ~ hr ~ ª ª ro C"1' C:;'
(')(t):::S ~-' ('). nn. ~-'tn c.... ;::Ii
..,~n (')ÞI;:;C-''''''''-' ÇèC -" 0
(1)..., n (1)' (1). -11 VI 0
~ (1) (1)-11 _~ 0 0 ..,
roV'>~ -113' ;0:::1(1);0'" ~
~(1) 0(1) (1)n (1) :::I"
("")-" ,::S(J')-t)-'co-n("") (I)
:::r. -t¡ rtrt· o. c: ..,
ØJoo-" )<-1
:::s ..,:::r (j');:O V><
:3 ØJ r+rooc-t'
ro :::I -'-t¡c-'
--' ::'I --" m
~ CJ"~ ~
~.., '"
~~ :::I
NNN.............,...........-
~~:';ofO~?'
,
-'. ::r: :r:
;::Ii -'. -"
><"IQ IQ
:::I" :::r
."
(1)n:E:
:::I :::r0
n",o
(þ -J. 0.
:::Iro
:::I
,
~. ."
:::I (1)
",":::I
n
."ro
ro
:::I
n
ro
:J:
(1)
~
'"
n
~
-c
:::I
::3
rrimfT1rfT1("")
. . . þþ. þ.
.."..".."nnïln-<
, :::t::r:, x·
O"I.þN ~.........
......................NN..þUl......
<J1w.......OOO"l'""'-Jl.T1
,..... N
COWN U1
-'¡O"It.DI..O(X)O"tWO
~~ëow~woo
NO\.C.þNOOO
(J1NNW
WNW
N-.¡O.........-.¡OJN.........
~N():)COO"lW.......U1
.......U1"'O'IOJt.D~O
, . . , , . , .
OCO......CO.þcooo
OOlDOOOOO
N .þ
NDNt-IQ)
<.r1WQ)CCON0.......
· , , . . . . .
tJ'IOOoooo.....
OOOOOOOCT>
W,.....,.....
..þ w -.¡ m
.. '" '" '" '" '" '"
.........NN<..110NU11..O
.......wO"\O"\o......................
NlDCT>OONO......
· , . . , . . .
tJ'Ioooooo.þ
00000000
W
........þNW......W
tJ'IWOOOOOO
, . . . . . . .
01U1000QOa
00000000
W.......N "þ-.¡..þ
.. .. '" '" '" ..
...........þ.......OO-ÞWU11..O
.......þ.......aOCO-.¡01
NtJ'IOOOOOO
· . . . . . . .
UlU10aooOO
00000000
N .þ
NWW......O
..................OOOO"'1U1UlO
· . . . . . . .
00000000
00000000
.þN""".þ
,.....
tJ'I ,..... CT>
~oom~...............wo
NI..DOOÇ)Ot-'U10
l.n ,.. en (,I c., l) PILI
· . . . . .
00000000
OOOOaOCJO
.....
tJ'I
.....
.þ
n
<
N
,.....
o
N
tJ'I
o
o
o
tJ'I
N
tJ'I
o
o
o
o
W N
N W
tJ'I N
CT> W
...... tJ'I
N
CT> 0
CO ,.....
W .þ
lD .þ
o ......
...... .þ
o tJ'I
W
W
o
o
o
CT>
lD
W
o
o
o
o
tJ'I
o
o
o
o
,.....
o
<.n
w
o
o
Cl
o
o
I-' ...... ....... ......
WN.......O
<D
n
-<
-iV'>,n
O· . .
Z"ï1-<
. .
CO
CT>
......
NW ,.....
.......(J'1()'1..þ
CT>OCT>O
,.....
CT>
CT>
.þ
o
W
tJ'I ,.....,.....
OW-ÞN
· . . .
0000
0000
,.....
.þ
!"
N
CT>
~
CO
o
,..... .þ
0""" W
ooå.........O-'
o <.n COCO
00.þ0
· . . .
0000
0000
W W
.þ """0 0>
ww<..nm 1..0
· .
0<.n0""" .....
OOOW lD
.þ N
1..0....... N .p.
NNCOCO lD
CON-Þ<..n 0
COCJ1QOO CO
00 ON .......
0000 m
N
N
o
o
o
,..... W
Q) W
OlWCOO
OW COO
oaoa
,.....
<D
o
W .þ
<.n ,..... Q)
w w .
0'\ ...- ..þ N
-ÞU1\.DO
OU1NO
OOCOO
0000
......
.þ
o
o
o
N
W
o
o
o
W
Q) Q)
owcoo
0000
0000
,.....
lD
<D
.þ
,.....
C)
,..... <.n
N""" 0
w w w
\0 a +=- ..þ
Q)()l-ÞO
\.:) 0 (Y) L I
o
o
0000
0000
0::> ......... m t}1
::J
'"
~
o
..,
"'"
n
<
r-V1rr
ï1 ï1 ï1 c.n
CT>
.þ
NW"""
,..... <.n Q)
oa..þ.......
W
CC
<.n
o
o
,.....
<.n
o
Nowa
occoo
O<.noo
N
.þ
CT>
.þ
o
o
o
,.....
w
..þ N ..þ (Jl
N \.0 \.0 0
0........."'0
o <.n 0 0
0000
CT> CT>
.þ ,.....
o 0
W.......NC> a
0000 0
0000 0
;r' ;t'
O)WW.þ .......
W()lNO 0
OOCCO 0
0000 0
0000 0
W
W
o
o
o
<D
o
o
I-' N ..þ 0
.......rv-ÞQ
0000
N
,.....
,.....
N
o
o
o
"'................0
W......NO
....... 0...... a
OOQ)O
0000
<.n
o
o
W........ND
0000
0000
.þ
o
o
o
o
N
<.n
Q)
C)
, >
.:-n
mwwO
W(J1NC)
I,:) (.~ OJ C,)
o
C)
0000
0000
f"
:J:
(1)
~
~
::y
-c
ro
<D
WN"""
n
¡;;
~
~
~
"'"
VI
~
;-
V'>
nnc:
z
-<-<-
-i
,.....
,.....
.......oc:-o
oo~~ç
.þ......-iZ
<.n.þ-
-i
-<
.þ
o
o
o
o
,..... 'U c:
wo;:oZ
--
OlDn-i
001"T'1
.þ
o
o
o
o
,.....
,.....
<.n .þ
n
<.n ,..... 0
W CT> V'>
tJ'I '" -i
0'"
00
'U c:
NCC;oZ
--
......COn
tJ'I <.n I"T'1
<D
<.n N
o~8
...... lD V'>
W.þ-i
...... <D
<.n 0
lD
o
o
o
o
o
,..... 'U
.......m;:cZ
. . t-04.......
OlDn-i
001"T'1
'"
o
o
o
o
o
lD
o
o
o
o
o
N......
ON
n
NNO
lD...... V'>
tJ'IO -i
o CT>
00
'U c:
CCCJ1;OZ
--
oon-i
001"T'1
lD
o
C)
c,
,..... <.n
.þ N
w w n
......Wo
n, "" V1
~~--i
00
CJ C)
o
<:)
0::>
-
0::> 0
-< V'>
c...o
O~
O::>Z
I"T'1
z;o
0·'
"Z
'f ~
w:r:
N
W;;O
-
n
o :r:
1"T'1'
V'>þ
nz
¡:;o
'U :r:
-i -
>-< ,
0,
Z V'>
0::>
-
o
o
>-<:E:Þ
3:Þ-i
'U, I"T'1
;0"""
~~ ~
I"T'1 0
zoo I
-i;occ
V'>~W
n -i
:r: -
3:
o I"T'1
;;0 ..
¡I~
G'> 0
1"T'10
~
~S
. 0
~
o
Þ
-i
I"T'1
--.l
\'I
1:'1
I
~
W
~ ~;-c;o:
...... 0):>
I
N :E:
CC 000<
.þ ;::co.......
I -iXZ
lD :I: V'>
~Õ'!w õ5~
N~-1<..n
.......><N(""1
00' 00
z
V'>
-i
.,,'U:J:
-i' ~
00
CD
,.....
......
I
.þ :E: n
<D 0000
CT> ::eOZ
I -ixV'>
<.n :I: -i
\,O""-J" 00;0
,.....'" OC:
.þ,.....-i.þn
NX......-i
.þ.' 0
z
CD 'oo'U
~ §~~
I 00 :r:
...... 0""" Þ
.þ n<.nz
......, 7'00
I '-J'" or-
W lD I"T'1
<.n.þ-i
.þOx n
moo' <::)
z
V'>
-i
~
CD G'>CT>:r:
...... ;:;0 ......... ):>
...... ÞCC,
I 'U ,
.þ I"T'1I"T'1
CD <. n
,..... _ 0
I zzz
(J1 mOt./)
(J1 ......, .. ;:o--t
OQ) -i::O
(J1 0 -t :I: .
tJ'IX~
....... rr1 n
V'> 0
--j'
:r:
:E:
..,~
/
8^
zZ
1:0
<::;
~~
q
~O
~f
3'>m
'z
gc¡
~r-
;;-
,
V)
I
~..!n
~5
~
m
;;0
VI
z
(ì
0::>
o
-i
Þ
00
c:
,
Þ
-i
o
Z
V'>
:r:
I"T'1
I"T'1
-i
,.....
o
.."
.þ
OJ
>--<
o
0:>
o
2
o
<.11
""
<.11
""
<.11
""
UI
""
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~d~oo
n 0 ()::J =::3 < --' :t:::oo(1;) -0 =
o QJ 0 C> 0 c+ ro mo· ...J'""O Q.. :;0
~.<...J. ...Jo...l. 0 ...J. ~-o-'~O~
ØI. QJ '""0 PJ --'.:£: ...... .:.;: ØJ ~ -'::J 0 () 0
... . l/'). m "'j QJ -s V1 --.1.<.0 ....I, ^ ()
.......... W QJ";UOCt> --':::""
~ ~ (/)... g;~:g'" :g n ~ ~ Q..~.po 2';0
~~nn~o-'.n-·--'o-·~n=~~
ro o.~-m::Jª --'ª Qª (""t-~ o~g:
c.. <".. ... <.11rt 1"\.,)3 ro rD-'
:Þo Qa C = Ø,1....t. <.11 0 f'D ~ 0 m m
= --'tx:J--'(""'t........o......... ...........-':::)"'C cc
c;x::Ift) =<rt:::l..:::I OV1O"" .. (0;0
-0 A (D ....I, n () a -s r+ V1 0:::1 C. ....I.
-" -t,.þ ::J -'O-'t: .. ro .......0..-0
man Q<::tlO ¡::. n;tJ ............:J::I-i.
n .. 0 V1 n c+CD:z::........=:1 :::1;:0
QJ :::I CD" rr1rTrT1--oCOC\JI..C.)QJ
V1 -C () 0 x >< --'lQ 0 0.. --' "'C
c+ c:::. xnn n........· c:.aCJQJ;3:
n (Jm" ª ~ ~~ ci fT1~ V1G)~ ~
o 0::3 n"C 0 :::s x ........ -S rD
~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~::s ~ x: ~. ~ ,,~ J.
_. VI "'C rt C/) c-t c+ VI
:::I ro -' m OJ V'I cc ., G')
3m '" ",. .,
"ro cT ~, ..., " ..., n '"
....1.::5 ro::J .....1'."""0 ~lJ)
:3: -0 r+ -0....... V1
:I: m........· -0 ro -0
::J --' fD r-
n '" ~ ",n
~ª~~ ~ ~~~
~.:~~ ~ d'~~
(þ ~--'.
ro '<--1
r+ n.l.,
:::r cTro::s
'-;: Çf~
I ~
W
<.11
n
>
,
rr1
2
o
>
;;0
o
>
-<
(/)
--1
o
--1
>
,
~
o
c::
2
--1
0:>
>--<
o
(/)
(/)
n
ª
-0
~.
::s
~
ITI ,
> .
n 'T1
::I:_
N
-Þ
o
-
-Þ
<.11
<.11 W
co W -Þ
-Þ Ow
o 0<.11
.... 0'"
\0 00
N
-Þ
o
-I>'>
<.11
N
CD
<.11
N
W
<.11
N
N
<.11
o
-
<.11
W
-Þ N
.... 0....
-Þ 0--"
N 0'"
.... 00
o 00
N
<.11
ON
0<.11
00
00
-
<.11
--..
W
W
en
'"
....
--..
UI
o
o
wwww
..þ{,.ùN.......
w
o
::s
~
nlTl',
- > 0:>'
-<0- ï1
- ::I:
-Þ
N-Þ
....
N
N '" \0
W~O'1W
....
'"
<.11
P:-O
0\0
00
.... -Þ
.... -Þ N
OON.......
. . -
OON<.11
0000
N........NN
U1 """'-J......... 01
wmooU1
oow.........
000<.11
0000
....
'"
<.11 N
00
00
00
.... <.11
ON W W
O<.11NCO 0
OON'" '"
00<.110 --..
w
W CO
o CO
00
00
00
NNNW .þ
VJ¡..-I-OJUl W
OO-ÞCO CO
000"'11..0 U1
OONCO CO
000'10 ........
....
o
o
O-Þ
00
00
....N
....--.. N
0<.11.........0
00.........0
0000
N.......................
Ul.........WOJ
W C> \.C 0'\
C> C> ..- C>
OOU1Q
OODO
.... -Þ ....
<.110 N
OO......lT1
0000
0000
<.11 ....
0....
C)O
tJ L.J
....
w..-q-"'.......
..þo.mNcn
01 0 ('"J'I 1"')
l-) t.)tJI(JI
0000
0000
00
00
NNN
\0 CO --..
;-
."
ITI (/) (/)
> -
n-<-<
::I:-
....
-Þ
W
........
~ ~
........
....--..--..
-þ"''''
....
\0
CO
o
N
<.11
OWO
o CO '"
0<.110
N
CO
W
....
W.þ
<.11 <.11 --..
ONO
0--"<.11
o '" '"
000
-Þ
o
N
<.11
0--......
0<.11....
000
w CO >-'
<.11 CO N
ON\O
oow
000'1
000
....
m
o
o
....
.... ....
0........
00....
000
.;->
N
ex>
CO
o
o
....
....N....
. . ~
<.11 \0 N
-þW\O
omw
oom
000
CO
<.11
o
o
w
o
o CD N
000
000
....
N
....
-ÞON
....
(t1
."
N<.11W
~:~ ~~
o
o
000
000
NNNN
CJ"IU1.þW
~
n
'<
::s
o
0..
o
::s
o
'"
()
cT
'::.
o
::s
n n n
-<-<-<
N
'" .... -Þ
wcow
.... W <.11
N<.110
000
000
W N
.... '" ....
<.11 W <.11
"'00
000
000
.... <.11 '"
<.11 -Þ 0
- - -
000
000
W N
~ ~
\0 \0 <.11
-Þ --.. CO
<.11NO
000
000
....ww
....00
000
000
N ....
~ ~
CO <.11 N
\O-þ\O
WOO
000
000
.... (.oJ <.11
NOO
000
000
W N
.... <.11 ....
(n .f.. 01
\-JI (..J cJ
000
000
>--<
--1
rr1
3:
a
ITI
(/)
n
;;0
>--<
"
--1
>--<
o
2
c::
2
>--<
--1
c::"
>,
:z
--12
>--<
--1
-<
0:>
.-.
0:> 0
-< V>
o
>
--1
ITI
~
t'J
CJ
,
~
"C::
;;02
>--<>--<
n--1
ITI
n
o
(/)
--1
"C::
;;02
>--<>--<
n--1
ITI
n
o
(/)
--1
"C::
;;02
>--<>--<
n--1
ITI
n
o
(/)
--1
"C::
;;02
r:;::¡
ITI
n
o
V>
--I
c...0
o :E
0:> 2
m
2 ;;0
0"
.. 2
'î' ~
W::I:
N
w;;o
>--<
n
o ::I:
m,
(/) >
n :z
;:<::0
~I~
0,
2 (/)
0:>
>--<
o
a
>--<:E>
3:>--1
" , ITI
;;0 ;><; -.
0'"
< ;;0 --..
rr1 - I
3:(/)N
m 0
20:> I
--1;;oco
(/)~W
n--1
::I:>--<
3:
o ITI
;;0..
il;;?
'" 0
rr1 0
~ ~:"'~
--.. 0>
I
N :E
CO 00:><
.p.. ::::OOÞ000004
I --I >< :z
\0 ::I: (/)
00.......,.. ....-.0
00) CO2
N.........-iCJ1
.........XNCJ
CO- 00
:z
(/)
--1
"'''3:
--1' I><>
00
CO
....
--..
I
-Þ :E n
\0 00:>0
'" ;;002
I --1 x (/)
<.11 :r: --1
\.D -.J" CO;::O
....... 0'> 0 c::
.þ.......-i-ÞCJ
NX-.J-1
.þ - >--<
o
2
CO ,0:>"
~ §~~
I 0:> ::I:
-.¡ O.......þ
.þ. nU1Z
........, ~aa
I -.¡.. 0 r
W CD ITI
<.11-Þ--1
-Þox n
'" CO . 0
2
(/)
--1
;;0
co G'>O'\:I:
....... ::::O~:Þ
--.. >CO,
I " ,
-Þ ITI ITI
CO <. n
.... >--< 0
I ZZZ
CJ1 n1 0 V>
CJ1 ........... ;0--1
0'" --1;;0
CJ1 0 --I :I: .
<.11 X :E
........ rT'l CJ
(/1 0
I'
./
8A
t;,Z
§O
z ;,f
C\q
~O
~ Z
~~
'- Z
go
~~
'5-I
~.l¡,
&"1
o
:f
m
;;0
,v)
Z
()
0:>
o
--1
>
0:>
c::
,
>
--1
o
:z
(/)
::I:
ITI
ITI
--1
N
o
'T1
-Þ
::I:
::c
.~
N N N ...... .....q...... ......
N......OI.OOJ-.JQ)
.....
tTl
.....
.¡::,.
~ff~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~g~~ii~i~i~~
~33~.......I""'. no~O~o~ ~ m~«n<~<~n
V)OO«"'Cc;J(t)O;:,O(t)O(þ-i(""")c....O~O ..::r. c.c. M'~
rt«ro(t).......I""'.~ ~., ~orooroon ~,~
..., ro (t) ) , co QJ V) ""t:J -I. -0" -0 =......::3:;:, , C rr1 m n QO OJ QCI 0 ~
c....rtrt. C/)("'tU') <.non(')~-o'"'tJrt><XI:: .......t .......tv)
(') ""'0;0 ¡......t ...... ~ ....... ÞO-4 =?C:'. ...... V') ...... V'I ...... ...... - 0 - a .......t ......
rt ;::0 ::0 ;0 ;::0 ...... ~ PJ.. 0" :::::s.. :;:) ....... (1) ""'""" n V) U1 < ...... tn ..... ro -+3
rt)roQ QJ"'Cro3 ~ (') xn(""")~ Ortrtrot.n U1~-"
2\:1 "'0 ............. ro (1)"'O n n - n ~ 0 Co t.n n c.... n::::s' . , "'C -+3"'0 rt)
ro ........._--'.......1 ""0" --'(/).......1. --'::Þo::::s, -0 -n rt· o· co..
::E QJ ØJ .............. n Ø.I c+ QJ . CJ n CT 0 ØJ.. . , n n , I'D ~
nn::3~~~"""'t.n...,U1;::O , ...,tn rooo~o o:::::sn-i
..þ ro (þ lC (,Q .....I 0 :::::s t.n '-= U1 (þ = ~ Qoo -I. V1 (""") = c+ =,::5 -to) n -+3 V1 :T rr1
_ < --' (') n ....., ::Þ 0 a < 0 n (þ (') n n c::: ...... ØJ 3:
RaQo""'CÞro ro --' =("'1- =, =, -,......ro =3 = "'"'\ - 0 rr1--'fT1("'t::::S
X 0 ::::s ..., U1 _ :::þ Co):::lo'" ...... CO.. n""C" 0 ro ::::s x < x l.C:::. ::::s 0
...... C/) C/) VI n c+ =..., = V1 -c < = = - -, c+ n n ...... fD.....· ro 111
lO(t)ft)c+::r .......;:0 ro.. r+CQ,lft) n "roC:"""SVI-,VlfT1-(/)
::rc+rtt.no~~(Þï1V) --'::::s<~øoll-'OÞ -,roc+rtc+3 n
n g g ...,~. ~ ~ 0.. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~-ð :; ;:, ~ ~ S? r::r rtj. ~. g ~ ~
::r () n ""'C .......t _ ª ......... ~ :1 (D.. r+ - 3 "'tJ ro ::r -I. QCI c.... -I. c..... ::J n ""'C
QJ~~ _-I. C/)m::::S3 ~::::s (þ m-Q..QJ< xroa..ro~QJ~
...... QJ::::Sï1rta..oro mrt..........,.....·a..· -(t)øro::::sro""3<~
:::::s ..þ ~ rt<.Q....... --- .......t 0.. 0... :::::s..:::::s .. n rt ~ c: OJ :::::s ::::s ..., CD Ø.I 0
m --' _ n _ ;0 n n 0 QJ rt c.. ....... ....... ....... ::::s rt :z:
U1 ~ g;a~ b'-ê:-,;;:sg;;~ ~~~ªªmrt;:;.
nm=' :3--' 0- no- ""--'v) c... :::I
"'"'\ -t¡ () n QJ :::0 --'.. , -' Qo -oJ 0
(þl" nro- ro. -t¡ (J)a
rt ro ro-t¡ ÞO-4rt 0 a )
roV1rt -+.3· ;o::lro;o-. r+
rtro oro ron ro ::T
n-' .,::s(/)-t¡-'OJ-ttn m
::r......, t""trt··O·s::::::..,
Q,lon....... )<--'
::I .,::T V1;o V1<
::I ØI rtro"rt·
('þ ::3 -'--t)e--'
-' :::J ..--'Im
ro < ><
--' (/')(t)-o
rt -. ØI
~rt ::I
,
... ·:::I:X
::3 ..............
...- <C <C
::T ::T
-r¡
ro,,:E:
::I ::T 0
nØlo
(þ ....... 0..
::Iro
::I
õ
~, -r¡
::I ro
...-::1
n
-r¡ro
ro
::I
n
ro
:;;::
ro
a.
~.
ØI
"
~
-c
::I
~
............... ............
WN......O
<D
CO-.....JQ')(J'1
f>'
WN.....
"
c
~
2!
:;;::
ro
r+
~
~
~
ØI
rt
~
o
-.
...-
:y
...-
'"
-c
ro
"'"
rrrmrr1rmn " " -IV1,n n ,V1,r ;- nnc
):> ):> . ):> . ~ o· ~ . . Z
ï1"T1"T1nn"T1n-< -< Z"T1"-< "'T1 II "T1 (j') Y' -< -< ......
::I:::I:. ::I:. . . . -I
.....
.....0 C -0
w w ):>,
O'I'¡::" N ..... ..... N co NW .... NW..... co .¡::,. Z ):>
-.......J.............NN..þU1....... ..... 0'1 .......01U1~ 0'1 ..... tTl 0'1 .¡::,...... -IZ
<J1w.......OOQ')-.J<J1 0 ..... 0'100'10 .¡::,. OO~""" ..... tTl'¡::"......
-I
-<
.¡::. tTl W
.......... N.....O 0 tTl
~~~~~f'?f> :=' 0
00000000 0 0
00000000 0 0
..... w
0 0
'¡::"WN N..... 0'1 ;n W
.. .. .. .. .. .. ':¡:.
O-.J......N......I..OU10 0
U1............00N-.......JO 0 tTl
0.....000000 0 0
. . . . . . . . 0
00000000 0
00000000 0 0
N .¡::,. .¡::,. W
.......o........~w-.J ..... N
~~~::>~?~?' ~ 0'1
OOOOOOOtTl tTl tTl
00000000 0 0
..... N
N 0 co
'¡::"NN'¡::" tTl.¡::,...... 0 W
OO~ONOON-:-' w
0 0
CJ"1C))WOO..þN..þ 0'1 .....
OtTlNOOO.¡::...... ~ ~
. . . . . . . .
OOOOOOOtTl 0 tTl
00000000 0 0
0'1 0'1
tTl 0'1 0 0
<D NO 0 0 0 -0 C
OWOO 0 N~O"'IO 0 CO<D ;OZ
...... ......
OtTlOO 0 0000 0 00 "
0000 0 0000 0 001Tl
..... ..... W
""............0 co
.. .. .. ..
-ÞN......a .¡::,.
'¡::"NNO 0
OtTlOO 0
0000 0
0000 0
.¡::,. .¡::,.
0'1 N..... .....
OWOO'l 0'1
. . . .
OtTlOtTl tTl
0000 0
..... <D
0'1 '" .¡::,..¡::,.
n
'¡::"W<DO 0 .....NO
NtTlCOO 0 0'1 '" V1
o O.¡::,. 0 0 0'" -I
0000 0 00
0000 0 00
.....
............N~
. . . 0
OOtTlO
0000
...... t-" "'tJ c::
W U'10;:clZ
tTl ...... ......
o 00"
o 001Tl
..... '" W ..... .....
N................m 0 .¡::,. ;--'
i..DN........-.....J .¡::,. NW-Þa tTl
O'IN N........ <D ...... Ul........ 0 0
OUlOO ~ 0000 0
0000 0 0000 0
0000 0 0000 0
.....
o
<D .¡::.
w w "
N.....O
N'¡::" V1
tTlo-l
00
00
GO
O:E:
OJ Z
ITI
::<:;0
0"
..z
I~ 0
;0 ~ ^
-I
::I: 0
¡;; Z
;0 c 0
...... ':¡
" z ~
O::I:
ITI , CJ ~
(1):> Z
n Z 0
~O CJ
~ Z
-0 ::I: I
-I ...... ~ m
...... ,
or "- Z
Z V1 g [)
OJ ~ r
......
0 V1
=r I
0 , I
¡.......4:;Eþ ~ -1"1
:;;::):>-1
-0 , ITI ~ r
;0 7'< .. 0
o ITI ~
<: ;0 .....
ITI - I
3:V1 N m
fT1 0 7J
ZOJI V1
-1;0 CO
V1~W ~
n-l
::I: ......
3:
o fT1
;0"
~I"'"
2 0
):>..
ø 0
fT1 0
OJ
-<
OJ
......
o
V1
~
t
o
):>
-I
ITI
.....J
I
N
~
,
C)q
\At
N ,OJ):>
...... mO(/')
.¡::,. :E:X::I:
I ...... ,
.¡::,. V1.....):>
w <:.......7'
'" ...... W
I ,
tTl Õ
tTl fT1
g¡:¡. w
0-1
0'1 x
......
~ ~:"~
..... 00
I :E:
N :E: Z
.¡::,. 0 OJ
.¡::,. ;00"'"
I -I x
0'1 ::I: OJ
o -.......J.. ....... r-
NO"'I N:Þ
.¡::,......-IOA
.......XO'l:;z
",. U1rr1
-<
-0 C
;02
............
n-l
ITI
n
o
V1
-I
-0 C
~~
n-l
fT1
"
o
V1
-I
/
OJ
o
"
o
Z
-I
;0
-I
):>
OJ
C
,
):>
-I
o
Z
V1
::I:
fT1
fT1
-I
w
o
"T1
.¡::,.
0:::>
.....
CJ
0:::>
o
Z
CJ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~d~~
n 0 Cì::3 ==' <--';:Þoro--o =
o Ø1 CJ 0 0 rt" ro ro O· ......"'0 CL ;t:J
-I. <...... -'. ....., 0 -'. 0.. -C ....., V1 0 ;::0
ßJ. OJ -oØJ --'::¿:-J.z:~ Qo -J~ 0 n 0
(,/'). (t)") PI ) . c.n ......I.Q -t. 7" (l
1--1 QJ' OJ... ;oom --' '7'"
-t rT'1 ... G">~"'O'" -a ro 0.. c.. ~ ;;:0
~3c.n 01)"'0 -an--'CL ~~C~
"O~nnrtO-'.n-,·--'o-'·ØJn=~C
roc..::r-'(1)::3::)-':.'I' n::3r+O crcr
ro' lC.lC CJlC 30-'CT ....ooI
~ <""T'1'" .. lJIrt' N3I'D(1)--'-t
~~~~~~~~I--I~ro~--,g~~ro~
c:cro =< c+::::::I" =' 0 (./')c:T ro;::o
-0 7' ... (t) -I. n n 0 """5 c+ (,I) OJ c.. .....I, 0
"""S-t,.þ :::I--'O--'C" (Dl--la..-om
~. .? g Qo~' ~. g ~ þ::; ~ :.'I :;'::0 ~
Q.I :;:, c:c.. rr1r+rr1' "'C C OC -OlD ØJ;::O
Vi ""'0 n 0 >< X --,C,Q a c.. --' "'0........
c+ c:::. x('"")n n........· coQJ~3: -c
n ... OQJ........cu') VI nØl-t
n1 3<')<om("'t-(J')G')rÐrt 1--4
o =' n""O' o· ::3 >< "",.""'1 ro 0
~ ~ ª ~ QO::3 ~ x: ;:;;. ~ :n ~ J. :z
....I. VI -0 rt l/) r+ c+ VI
:::I (t)-'roc::c(./)c;c,· G)
'\J ffi ~ ....., ~ -0 ~. (""") ~
...... ::3 (t) :::I. -I,. -o:::r (/)
3: "'tJ c+ "'0....1,. VI
~ ro... :;.~ ro ~ r-'"
n ØJ ~ ØJn
;;ª:g~ :;; ~:;~
0"0 OJ ~ -om"'C
;-' --' ~ t.< ~ --' --'
rt> '<-I
c+ ro,.....·
~ ;~'" 0
I c..¡:VI~ 2,
w
()"I
n
:Þ
r
",
Z
CJ
:Þ
::0
CJ
:Þ
-<
V>
-I
o
-I
:Þ
r
~
o
c::
Z
-I
0:::>
.....
CJ
n
o
'"
n
V>
V>
n
~
"0
'"
::3
", r
:Þ .
n"
:x: .
()"I
""-
N
()"I
(J1
-
......
W
()"I
N
(J1
.þo
0)
o
(J1
.."
-
......
.þo
.þo w
00 O.þo
..... 0 .þo
\D 0 0
00 00
o 00
WWWW
~WN~
W
o
NNN
\D 00......
...,
'"
::3
nrT'1rr
:Þ 0::>.
;<~. ;n
~
"
", V> V>
:Þ .
n-<-<
:x:. .
.þo
N .þo
.....
N
N O)\D
W.þtT1W
I-' I-'
I-' I-'
I-' ...... ......
.þoO)O)
I-'
.þo
W
I-'
o
o
o (J1
00
00
I-'
(J1
o
o
N
o I-'
o 0 0
o 0 I-'
000
I-' 00
00 W
OOWO
0000
0000
N
ON
ON
00
00
00
NWWW
... .. .. ...
WN........O"I
00\.00
00(J10
. . . .
0000
o 0 0 0
N
(J1
(J1
o
o
o
I-'
N I-'
00...... .....
00).....
00......
o 0 0)
o 0 0
N
o
o
o 0) 0
OOW
000
I-'
()"I
0.....
00
00
00
I-' .þo
o (J1 W
00.....0
0000
0000
N
(J1
o
o
N..-..-N
WOON"""'"
ooGT\l.D
OOUlO
0000
0000
,;-v
()"I
......
(J1
N
00 ......
OOW
o (J1 (J1
OO)N
0000
000
o
o
NNNN
(J) (J1 .þo W
~
n
'<
'"
o
C-
o
::>
¡?
n
<+
~
(""')('"")\)C
. . . :z
-< -< -< 1-4
-I
c::"
):>,
N z):>
O)......þo-lZ
wCOw.......
-I
-<
NN
.....00"c::
o 0 0 ;0' Z
..... .....
ooon
OoOtT1
NWoo
.. .. .. n
"'0'\0'\0
waOV')
000-1
000
000
.......NO'\-C<=
NOO::OZ
. . . ~......
ooon-l
000",
W N
v v n
t-'WU10
(J1O)OOV>
0)00-1
000
000
0:::>
-<
CJ
):>
-I
",
~
,
~
,
Co
"N
"C::
::oZ
.........
n-l
tT1
n
o
V>
-I
"c::
:;oZ
..........
n-l
",
n
f7.
-I
0:::>
.....
CJ
(/)
c... 0
g~
",
z :;0
0"
..z
\';"~
W :x:
N
W::O
.....
n
CJ :x:
", ,
V> :Þ
n :z
~CJ
-0 :x:
-I .....
.....r
0'
z (/)
0::>
.....
CJ
CJ
.....::e::):>
3:):>-1
",,,,
::0;><;;"
o ",
<:;0......
", - 1
3:V>N
", 0
Zo:::>l
-1::000
V>:ÞW
Z
n -I
:x: .....
3:
CJ ",
::0"
il~
'" 0
"'0
N ,o::>:Þ
...... rr10VJ
.þo ::e::><:x:
I ..... ,
.þo V>......:Þ
w c:::.......""
0) .....W
I ,
(J1 ,
()"I tT1
g~v
0-1
0)><
........
~ ~:"g;
...... 00
I ::e::
N ::e:: Z
.þo 000
.þo ::00""
I -1><
0) :x: 00
O'-J" .......r-
NO) N):>
.þo.....-IO;><;;
.-xmz
0"'1. (J1 fT1
-<
/
87'
z Z
cO
~<
z<
~~
~O
~z
'" I
V'm
~~
:¡:r-
Q V'I
S:-I
~.ln
[r-
o
~
m
^'
VI
z
()
0::>
CJ
8
Z
-I
::0
-I
:Þ
0:::>
c::
,
):>
-I
o
:z
V>
:x:
",
",
-I
.þo
o
"
.þo
DATE:
6-17-83
1_
SUBJECT :_
Ordinance Amendin~ the Subdivision Ordin~nce #]95
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: This ordinance amends p~r~gr~ph #17, SpC'tion 2-0" 'R of t'hP ~lIbnh,;cdt"lT"
Ordinance. In a work session with the City Enginppr, City Attornpy, Ciry M~n~gp~.
Mayor. Mayor Pro Tem and l1\Yself i t w~!'I dptprminpn th~twp !'!hm,' n ~mpnn r'hp
subdivision ordin~nce to idpntify thp rp!'!pon!'!i'hi'ity of np'TP'OrPr~ ft"l~ r'hpi~
offsite dr~in~gp f~('i1irip!,!
Tr t.J':¡~ nprp'''",;npn rn~r r'hp- ,np'Tø' t"Ip'?r lObo'" ~
discharge hi"!'; storm w~tèr into thp rpC'ogni 7.pn t.J~rpr ("ollr!'!p r'h~r- ,.mlll n
handle the tpn yp~r r~;n5
A fpt.7 n~y~ ",frpr rni~ mppring. Ri("'h,:¡r~ ~]b;~
c~l 1 ed mp ~nn ni !,!(",,~!,!pn' nmJ f~~ t"Iff~i rp ~'hrml n r'hø dE"''?' oper 'be :responsiÞ] iii..
Richard and 'r finally decided to reconnnendthat the recognized water course
should-be at least 100 feet long so that 'the developer could not \1!'!P one
box culvert or bridge or anything of this nature as ~ reco~ni7.pd w~ter C'ollr!'!p
._-~.. - ,-~
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approve/disapprove the ordinance amending the
subdivision ordinance.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
N/A NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N / A
,) TJ?i. ¡J !J_
------------------------~--~-----------------------------------------
.'
..
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
June 9, 1983
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills. Texas 76118
Re: 3-200, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
OFFSITE DRAINAGE POLICY
We have modified Paragraph No. 17, Section 2-05, B, of the Subdivision Ordinance
regarding definition of IIrecognized watercourse" in accordance with your instruc-
tions in our meeting of June 7, 1983. We would note that this clarification of
the tenn IIrecognized watercoursell does extend the minimum capacity requirements
of a recognized watercourse for a distance of at least 100 feet downstream as
suggested by Gene Riddle. however, we also recall that Rex McEntire suggested
there might be a problem with enforceability of this downstream extension.
Please call if we can be of further service in this regard.
-~~~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l j c
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
--Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
~ Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public
~ Mr. Rex McEntire, City Attorney
Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.' BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021' 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
.....
.
....u
......
-.'
~~
~......
\t\ .~
'-=<~
4J ~-
-.
..
..
,--
-
...
,-
....
.".
,_.
,.........-
,.~:::
,..
16. Bridges are to be constructed at all street crossings over
the major streams in the City and shal1 have the proper dimensions to
fit the proposed channel sections ~iven in the drainage section of
the City's Comprehensive Plan or as stipulated by the City Engineer.
. .-- - ._.~ ---.--...
~
- - --
\
17. Developers wi 11 ; nsure -that -dlTè-care- is exerc; seâH-to
comply with the provisions of Texas Wa~er Cadet Sect. 11.086t and
this shall include having appropriate drainage studies and.plans
prepared and sealed pursuant to the PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS DISCIPLItlARY
RULES DR1.l. 2,2 and_3.l Bnd ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS EC 6.3 and 6.4.
Water concentrated in street~, pipes, drains. culverts, and channels
will be moved to a recognized water course without damage to intervening
structures or undue spreading acrosS intervening land. The developer
is responsible for constructing any channelization required to
accomplish this and also to obtain any necessary easements from
intervening land owners. Calculations will be requ,ired to show that
connecting offsite drainageways are capable 'of handìing any increase ,/
. in runoff due to development. concentration, or diversion for at ./",-/
'least the 10 year storm frequency~__.__._- _----
,.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS- .
, 1 981 .
day of
MA"YOR .
AïTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
/'
42
¡-
ORDINANCE NO.
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that ORDINANCE NO. 195, "Subdivision Ordinance", adopted
July 8, 1968, and as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended
at Section 2-05, B, Pargraph 17, to read as follows:
17. Developers will be responsible throughout their development
activities for obtaining compliance with the provisions of Texas Water Code,
Sect. 11.086, and this shall include having appropriate drainage studies and
plans prepared and sealed pursuant to the PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS DISCIPLINARY
RULES DR 1.1, 2.2 and 3.1 and ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS EC 6.3 and 6.4. Water
concentrated in streets, pipes, drains, culverts, and channels will be moved
to a recognized watercourse without damage to intervening structures or undue
spreading across intervening land.
A "recognized watercourse" shall herein be defined as either an open
channel with hydaulic characteristics which provide capacity for at least a
10-year frequency storm after ultimate development of it's watershed, or an
underground storm drain with capacity for at least a 5-year frequency storm
plus overlay relief sufficient to safely discharge up to a combined 10-year
frequency flow (based on ultimate watershed development) without damage to
adjacent property. Such 10-year capacity shall extend downstream from the
point of discharge or the developer s property line which ever is greater,
a distance of at least 100 ft. Typical examples of such "recognized watercourses"
are the main channels of Mackey, Calloway, Walker, Big Fossil, Little Bear,
and Mesquire Branch Creeks, or those tributary creeks, streams, channels or
underground storm drains which meet the hydraulic capacity requirements_öf a
"recognized watercourse". The developer is responsible for constructing all
off site channelization or underground storm drain with overland relief, required
to discharge concentrated stormwater from the low end of his development to the
reconginzed watercourse, and also to obtain all necessary easements from
intervening land:'owners. Calculations will be required to show that connecting
offsite drainageways are capable of handling any increase in runoff due to
development, concentration, or diversion for at least the 10-year storm frequency.
Passed and approved this
day of
,1983.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
., II
i..--- /-
DATE:
July 25, 1983
SUBJECT :_
Allocation of Funds (TnP Wnmøn'Q Centpr)
DEP ARTMENT :
Administration
BACKGROUND:
Council approved $1.000 to tnp Wnmpn'~ Center on September 13. lqR?
Funds were taken from Reserve for r.nnringpnl"Y H'n"'d
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
N/A
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
------------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Women·s Center or Torront Counly.lnc.
1203 Loke Street . Fort Worth. Texas 76102
1PE CRISIS PROGfW.\ (817) 338--4-456
BOARD OF
DI RECTORS
OFFICERS:
Lynn Searcy
President
Virginia Richards
Vice President
Kathy Arangio
Secretary
Steven Ginsberg
Treasurer
MEMBERS OF
THE BOARD
Tamara Arnn
Robert Ashman
Tiny Batts
Berlyn Bock
Mary Conner
ReniCourtney. R.N.
'"'Iavid Fielding
.'!ba Henry
Rebecca Krida
Mary K. Lilley
Jamy McCole
Bill Meadows
Pam Moore
Marty Norman
Loralee Pohl
Emmy Lou Prescott
Ann Quinn
Bob Renouf. M.D.
Judy Rosenblum
L. Keller Smith
Jane Tecklenburg
Jeannie Teddlie
Hollace Weiner
EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR
Karen Perkins
July 5, 1983
City Council
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear City Council:
As President of the Women's Center Board of Directors, I am writing to
request your City's continued financial support of the rape crisis
intervention and prevention services made available to your citizens and
your Police Department by the Rape Crisis Program of the Women's Center of
Tarrant County.
It is our hope that the City of North Richland Hills will
allocate $ 1,000 for these services (the same level as last
year) .
It is important to note that while the hours and range of services we are
providing your community and your Police Department are steadily
increasing, we are not asking your City to increase its financial support
for rape crisis intervention and prevention services.
Instead, we are asking more communities, especially in the Mid-Cities
area,to fund a modest share of the cost of a County-wide comprehensive
rape crisis program.
This year the Rape Crisis Program has served the best interests of your
citizens and your pOlice department well by encouraging and assisting the
implementation of rape exams in the Mid-Cities area, a strategy that will
directly benefit the Cities of North Richland Hills, Hurst,Euless,
Bedford, Richland Hills, Haltom City, Watauga, and Keller.
Formerly, police officers in these cities had to accompany sexual assault
victims to John Peter Smith Hospital in Fort Worth, typically waiting 4-8
hours for the completion of a rape exam required to preserve evidence and
enable prosecution.
Now, police in these cities will accompany victims to Northeast Community
Hospital, where rape exams should require only about an hour - a clear
benefit to Mid-Cities sexual assault victims and their families and a
clear savings of police hours and tax dollars for each City.
In setting up rape exams and rape crisis intervention services at
Northeast Community Hospital, our role included:
· Advocacy and collaborative planning wi th local police departments
and medical personnel.
A
IV
A United Way Agency
· Helping to train the volunteer physicians and the nurses who will
conduct rape exams and assist local victims. Further in-service
training for medical personnel will be provided at regular intervals.
· Recruiting, training, and supervising a cadre of 30 Hid-Cities
volunteers who will provide crisis counseling at NEC Hospital and
follow up services for Hid-Cities victims and their families.
One of the reasons that rape crisis services are so cost
effective in your community is that these trained volunteers
will donate over $ 10,000 worth of time and travel annually to
the Hid-Cities Rape Crisis Project.
In addition to these enhanced services, the citizens and police of North
Richland Hills will continue to benefit from the services that the Rape
Crisis Program of the Women's Center regularly provides in Tarrant
County. (Please review the enclosed list of services and the Rape Crisis
Program's record of service to the City of North Richland Hills (June
1982 - June 1983).
The importance of our program lies not just in the number of your
citizens we serve annually, but in the fact that we stand ready 24 hours
a day to assist your Police Department and your citizens with sexual
assault counseling, professional training and assistance, and crime
prevention programs.
Thank you for considering this request for continued financial support of
the rape crisis intervention and prevention services your City receives
every year from our agency.
We look forward to discussing this request with the City Council and City
Hanager of North Richland Hills, and will contact City staff soon to
schedule a presentation. In the meantime, Karen Perkins or I will be glad
to address any inquiries regarding this request.
Sincerely
e---/ ~--- ß '/-
.--------./ ¿ I! t--« -~ á (;¡~ /
//~ _/ ), ' // ( t.Çnn Searcy /'
'// .¡¡;~esident /
- / ¡
//
OUR RECOID OF SERVICE TO YOUR CœMUBITI
During the last 12 months rape crisis staff and volunteers have served the City
of North Richland Hills in the following ways:
. Crisis counseling and follow up services for 4 victims and
their families.
. Sexual Assault prevention programming for:
5 classes at Richland High
3 civic and community groups
(Cumulative total: 8 presentations served 326 persons)
Rote: These statistics viII rise during the su.mer IIOnths, vhen
reported rapes always rise dramatically.
COMPBRRR'NSIVE SERVICES PROVIDED BY 'l'BE RAPE CRISIS PROGRAM
1. A 24-hour Rape Crisis Hotline
2. A center where victims of sexual assault may turn for counseling and
assistance without cost. Specific services include:
a. Crisis counseling at the point of rape examination.
b. Crisis counseling for families/friends accompanying victims during rape
exams.
c. Other counseing services including telephone and inperson
counseling, follow up and accompaniment through investigative and
legal processes.
d. Support/Recovery groups for sexual assault victims and family
members.
3. Recruiting and training of volunteers - an active roster of over 100
persons.
4. Rape prevention/awareness programs designed to reduce the individual
risk of sexual assault and raise community awareness of sexual assault
issues.
5. A child sexual assault prevention program that targets school age
children throughout the County.
6. Technical assistance and training for professionals, including police,
medical personnel, counselors, and pastors.
FACT ~
RAPE CRISIS INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION SERVICES IN TARRANT COUNTY - 1983
THE CRIME.
· In 1983 Tarrant County sexual assault victims ranged in age from 18 months
to 94 years.
· 20-25J of all local victims are children under 14 years of age.
· 50J of Tarrant County victims were assaulted in their own home.
· If present levels of rape and sexual assault continue in the United States, 1
out of every 3 females can expect to be sexually assaulted in her lifetimes.
· National studies show that 1 out of every 4 children in America is sexually
assaulted before the age of 10 - 10J of little boys; 33J of little girls.
· The FBI estimates that only 1 out of every 10 sexual assaults is ever reported
to police because victims are either too young to report or fear personal and
and family stress and additional trauma during the criminal justice process.
· Since rapists and sexual offenders repeat their crimes again and again until
they are apprehended and imprisoned, encouraging higher levels of reporting
and prosecution by providing adequate and widely publicized victim services is
a key crime prevention measure.
· Most police officers have not received specific training in sexual assault
investigation or handling of rape trauma syndrome.
· A recent survey designed by UTA Professor Tom Marshall and commissioned by the
Coalition of Women's Political Organizations show that citizens in Tarrant
County consider rape a more serious crime than armed robbery or selling
heroin; 75% favor stiffer penalities for sexual offenders.
THE PROGRAM.
. To deliver 24-hour rape crisis services throughout Tarrant County, a paid
staff of 3 1/2 persons recruits, trains, and supervises 142
volunteers, who donate over $200,000 worth of time and travel to the Rape
Crisis Program every year.
Th1.a -.e8l18 that the dollars your C:lty allocates to support rape cri.ais
:intervention and prevent:lon serv:lces in your cOlllmlDity are I18tched I18DY
tt.es over by the contributions of these dedicated VO~ and -.en and by
other local dollars.
. In 1984 the annual budget for the Rape Crisis Program will be approximately
$ 108,000.
. Funding sources for the Rape Crisis Program in 1984 will include:City of Fort
Worth ($38,000); Tarrant County ($12,000); City of Arlington ($19,000); other
cities in Tarrant County ($12,000); Weatherford and Parker County ($6,500);
United Way (preliminary estimate $12,000); grants and contributions ($ 9,500).
"
>> m 0 & :: 5 0 m m O c m? c °�w e=3
ona5 $ ^ 0ad ; � -s as �ae
$ my $ ° a' 0 n w 0 0 § ,"+.9 O S E w °e nu
>,A �n G� 0. 3 nCd gam' > 2 , 0.000 E ,a, > 3�
co E vav = :4214§ 5CC0.t off o5oa
>,00fi'; . Gme > an- .. yy
o.na °. 0 ;02 ° no 0 .9 „ $ ° oo - , 0 -
• � as `vy • 40.63 - o0. „ c °: °0'0°$9 00
�y .Q'.>v . ddiA.3 m °i 603 as ya32CQ
e-. ,°, 0. e Vey33 8nti =' .0, 0 0. v du: 30,
0. .a > aeod C .O. � $ > >, E > c E .°., so ,.0w d0E
V mn3 ".o 0 mnM > n o � n 2843 ; IE �
.E
• E y A m w :m1°ran 33 J , 0> 00 1 E a E 3
0>io>a1C FyAq0o7 ' e > dorn pc0n0 S.� d n.o.
q 53 wA y' 0 C '0 W V I 30 n3 W i., U1nm
W .� O g E9 zt . > nma o .o. io 8 'e.:ai
d y v ▪v 0. w 0 tt 5sC0: -> 5
a
O gam' t� -,: p. H �.n a..;� � � m v v 0.i > 'i
0 c, '•+ N ° a •C � 03 :; .c d0 > g o
h ��" -atm o -. 63 _ ° °o .E o , „ , 0
184 ,1
ao � _ $ >+ aa
b H Q o.`.. "°n 01-, `8 .8 m3 ° t- > °Q' a .. e
• d y '„ � G m.c= m yj , 0O0 E 'Ey$
'Li "e5 .. CEq� 2gn 'e_ > ° 8eo 3 fine
.L m, y C > > C.d .' �. T § „ ...
U 0 ° 'o' em3 ° Ca .'
0 01• I d y w0_ n0p, T a$ ° C C 53 e
��. P. .+
.. 0-. >• 0. 3E °> = wwm.$ �°+ o : 2 =
d g d d 0ww Ew` 9nvaoz 0.6044=
in `� P. Sao 3 vc, `um u 3v` 0.0 ag
.' or d V �.
1• d Y O C d .4• 0
Oy 41 ,00 moyo ,oS "� geeO 0t2.n � 00Q
ce o C .C • 11' = -.5 ego ° 00..." 0004 044
0 q 3 a >
Q T �' (� O � n " a °0..9 OCV dyua 10ie III
I. y 3 T� > na d0. gm
ti c ti d !. 941g'e `u a , � % v°°. - Aw /'S _ 3.220.
a _
1 ■� `k"i � F- N veo`93a 0m omnaw00° , qC0.004°u a'
m d a w a O E ° �u. � 0 m n u .n. u e 0, 0 2 F a .
R. L 4 y FO. ooa0 oMV eL ugx 0 3. < b m e
m RA 0. ng � S .°� o � 3 eo$ 3g.a 4.97
P Q j�j p
u e o u y V a�W n 0 9 0 0 C y ... 0 O y ��jS d
Bn -"0.0 wel Y $Ou �Cy C >YqO � C'4'.4
. - Q A {,� O y 0.6
. . ^ N0.Q' n9 OUi� O AU >$d9p .a > ,01
o ms wegMgrAgg! > 2,5 g ,g00 00
a i�■ w3 rgasm 0 .54 ° 4 " ora = a $ . g,g ,,„ 0 0
4 a)a' m� e.;0. LO I �� C.a>a w 0.o G .S. o pflov0 at
rg i m$ � d3mooa ° i &'� ,• � � nU3vv3 > ' ,e
Z� a`� � an =$ 0.3 X3, 3 Pftma ..$ AC lit
Zw Ea3 `d aciC �yp3 `73a L' °' og.°"jg m m
0 $
-icgm9` �i �'a° ao3t8' a$Ul X ail
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
June 21 , 1983
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills , Texas 76118
Re : PS 83-51 , Short Form Plat,
Lot 8 ? Block 1 , Henry
Addition
We have received Knowlton-English-Flowers review comments on
the above referenced tract and we offer the following comments :
Item 1 . - City Staff function -
Item 2 . - The developer will agree to pay his pro rata
share of future curb and gutter and drainage =
improvements on Scruggs Drive. -
Item 3 . - The above referenced property has existing water
meter and sewer service. It has been council
policy in the past not to require pro ratas in
these instances .
Item 4.-- The building set back line of 25 feet will be
added to the plat.
If there are any questions regarding this matter please do not
hesitate to call .
9),51,01-e
Delbert R. Stembridge P .E.
cc : Mr. Roger N. Line , City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle , Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works