Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1983-06-13 Agendas~ •CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North~Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 H. E.~Loop 820, at 7:30•p.m, on June 13, 1983 I~L~~BER ITEM ACTIO;~ TAKEN Reconvenin of Ma 23 1983 Recessed Me tin ll~to rder 1 ' ._ _ - ~J ~ ~ //'' ~ d G!~~ ~• J ~. ~ PLANN ING ~ ZONING -PUBLIC HEARING - Recessed a~ th v PZ 83-28; Re nest of Wa ne E. Waters to Meetin Rezone Tract 2C J.~. Eden Surve Abstract 499, From A riculture to IF-9-One Famil Dwellin s Located East of Stone brooke . Drive at the end of Hi htower Drive and Ap roximatel 8b6 feet kTest of den oad .,.r. -_. _~ Consideration of Ordinance f P - ~ ~~~- - ~~~~-~ ~' S~JD ,t1.r '~ o~~~...~,~v _ ~_ ~, _ __ PLA~~'~~ING &~ ZONING -PUBLIC HEARING + __ PZ 83-29, Reouest of Southland ~ ~ r ~ ~ Financial Serv~g~n~p n ~ __ . .. _ ~ ~ Tract l , John Condra Survey . Ab~tra,.~.t~ 3' 1~,~ .,,,_ From _1 F- -One F~m11.~wellin - - -~ ._ ~_ One Family De~a11,i,~~~L..~~~~ the F.~ ~ 1 Side of .~uf e Snow 42 ' ____ ~__.__5__~eet North of ~~,z,~rnes Road __.. ___ • .;, • .. ~ •~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 N,E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m, on f' I~UI~ER ITEM ACTION TA]~I .~ r .~ ~.I~.~z_~Z.~h.I..~TG=.pUBL.Is~. HFA TNT ___._____ 3-~0 , R o~~,e~1~~~'1 ~ p ~ Y or d Van t o ..____. r__~j R P r P s ~ Q ri ~ fi t h__~P _ ~ta_~~ ~~,~~.~.3___._. . . .. _ _ . . i ~.~,~?.SZ rt.1~2T1~f . _ ; Add1 Tom ~1 RPfiAI~ to ' _ i j~o~~r_Pd at rhP __._._ ltrr~nPt~1nA ~1 O~'1Y,7a[1 anr~ ~i~ /~nr~~n~ - 1_ ~10 ~ ' _~_._.._ f I 9 e ..- ~ ~r~inanCe f___nr,~P ~ ~. ~ ~. , -3 ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ I ' ..._~ { , • ~.~.. r~r 1 ' ~ • • V' ~~~ ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the Narth~Richland Hills C' lty Hall Council Chambers, 1301 N.E. Loop 820, at 1:30 p.m, on ,Tune 13 1983 NU2~B ER ACTION TAKEN 'lam 7. •. _.._..._...~.r..._ _r...._......._.~_ .__.__ ~ '~~ , ~ ~, __ ~ ^. Page 2 CITY OF idORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 1301 N.E. Loop 824, at 7:30 p.m. on J NUt~.BER , ITEM ACTION TAKEN ~g • p - - ..~..._ ~~ ~ 9_._ ~ ~i~1.M\~~ t _ _ ~ .~ Y~r•~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~~r ~..~. ... ,. , ' • ..~wr - _ ~ 10 rwrw ~3 ~ .. _~~ _~~~P of llavi ~ Rn»1 p~Tarc~ ~~ Nar~nnrl Rn ~ iii ~ r r`ri..~r .~. ~.w~.r.rMr. rr~~.~.. M, 11 ~r~~. w~ . rwr ~' p c yip ~ TT~[TT TK rr_~~ .r.r ~..~,......~.....r...,; L V 1't~ai..~e.s~.... ~..5;~ .~..._._....-~-_~~.5:...~~ ~ • ..._..._.~._......_~~ ,th~~ F~~ fi1~a Cn„ t-1, l,t, •.:. ,~• • r ' Page 3 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills Cit Ha y 11 Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 1:30 p.m, on June 13 1983 NUMB ACTION TAKEN is ~ . j- ~. ~: ~. ., * ~ 14_:~ * 15. . 1~.: .~ 17. Consideration of Ordinance Controlling ~,~_~~ Water and Sewer Taps ~~ i .~__ * 1,~ Consideration of Ordinance for the Abateme ~ ..~._ - ..._..~...~..._....._......,_.,.,_,.,_,.,,__-_..~.._r.._._..~."....,_.._._ w ~ ~ of Dan Brous Buildi~n s V ---- ----.~. _r_r_____._..._ * 19. ~ Consideration ofOrdinance Chan in the - ~---- ._..._~,a-mew a,.~n Street s _................._.r....._- - .~.._.._.. ' Page 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills Cit Hall Coun y cil Chambers, 7301 N, E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.n~, on June 13, 1983 N~~BER ITF,M ACTION T AREN *20. Consideration of Awarding Bid for General Liability and Property Insurance (Bids to be opened June 13, 1983) 21. Consideration of .Texas Electric Service . Company for Rate Increase ,~ * 22 , Consideration of Awarding Bid for Self - - Pro elled Sweeper . ~ ~"`~~' .,____ 2 PUBLIC HEARING -CBS Black Hawk _ Coiranunications -Rate Increase Request ~ ~~~a~'~ ., _ 24, Consideration of Granting an Appeal Hearing ` ~~~ ~ ~'- ' ~ ~~ ~~~ on PZ 83-15 and PZ 83-16 -James Rust ~ ~~~ +........,..,.,,,,,~..~ w C. ,,,~,_25. Citizen Presentation ~ ~ ~;, Mr. Gar Br ant - T.C.O.A.D.A. ~w...r _~..-.. ~ Re: Su ort fron- the Alcohol Tax Funds ._.., 26 • Ad ' ournment ....._..... 1 ._. ..._. . - .~ ----.~. ,~~.r1t~ 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HILLS, TExAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 1301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, MAY 23, 1983 - 1:30 P.M. 1, Mayor Faram called the meeting to order May 23, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim Ramsey Jim Kenna Richard Davis Dick Fisher Harold Newman Marie Hinkle Staff Rodger Line Dennis Horvath Gene Riddle Ginny Pierce Rex McEntire Richard Albin John Whitney Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman City Manager Assistant City Manager Director Public Works Acting City Secretary City Attorney City Engineer Purchasing Agent Planning & Zoning Members: Marjorie Nash Press: Jeff Yeates Mid Cities Daily News Absent: J.C. Hubbard Councilman 3. The invocation was given by the Rev. Jim Olney of the Smithfield United Methodist Church. 4, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that there was an error in the Roll Call and that the records should be corrected to reflect Dick Faram as Mayor. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting May 9, 1983. Motion carried 6-0. Mayor Faram stated that legal petitions had been submitted against PZ 83-28 and PZ 83-30 and would require a 3/4 majority vote of the Council. Mayor Faram stated that since there was not a full Council present he would give the applicants the option of having the public hearing on the requests recessed until the June 13, 1983 Council Meeting. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING MAY 9, 1983 Page 2 May 23, 1983 9. Wayne Waters appeared before the Council stating that he wished to have his hearing recessed. 13. A representative for Gaylord Van Y came forward and stated that they would also like their hearing recessed. Mayor Faram stated that PZ 83-28 and PZ 83-30 would be recessed until the June 13th City Council Meeting. 5. Councilman Davis asked that Items ~~32 and 33 be removed from the Consent Agenda. 6. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to approve items ~~17, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31 on the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. 7. Councilman Davis asked to be permitted to abstain from this item that although he was not directly linked with this issue his firm had been involved in some of the plans that were drawn. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Bob Brady appeared before the Council and stated that he was the agent for Mr. & Mrs. Brown, owners. Mr. Brady stated that the property was 200 feet south of Glenview. That at one time this area was a quiet residential area. Mr. Brady stated that at one time this area was single family dwellings, however now you find garages, filling stations and businesses. Mr. Brady stated that this area was in an area of transition changing to commercial use and that Mr. & Mrs. Brown wish to move their business, B & B Pest Control, to this area. They were in compliance with the zoning ordinance. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-28, REQUEST OF WAYNE E. WATERS TO REZONE TRACT 2C, J.B. EDENS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 499, FROM AGRICULTURE TO 1F-9-ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED EAST OF STONYBROOKE DRIVE AT THE END OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE AND APPROXIMATELY 866 FEET WEST OF EDEN ROAD) PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-30, REQUEST OF GAYLORD VAN Y TO REZONE A PORTION OF BLOCK H, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO COMMERCIAL (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY AND ELDORADO) CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEM (S) FROM CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA (ITEMS ~~17, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-24, REQUEST OF TOMMY & SUE BROWN, B & B PEST CONTROL, TO REZONE LOTS 2R-1 & 2R-2, BLOCK 1, JACK M. ESTES SUBDIVISION FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO COMMERCIAL (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET SOUTH OF GLENVIEW DR.) Page 3 May 23, 1983 Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak in opposition of this request, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 8. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to approve PZ 83-24. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that there was commercial property within 2-3 blocks of this location and that he recommended the Council approve this request. Motion carried 5-0. 9. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey to recess this request until the June 13th City Council Meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 10. Recessed 11. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey to recess this request until the June 13th City Council. Motion carried 6-0. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-24 ORDINANCE N0. 1026 APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-28, REQUEST OF WAYNE E. WATERS TO REZONE TRACT 2C, J.B. EDENS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 499, FROM AGRICULTURE TO 1F-9-ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED EAST OF STONYBROOKE DRIVE AT THE END OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE AND APPROXIMATELY 866 FEET WEST OF EDEN ROAD ) RECESSED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-28 RECESSED PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-29, REQUEST OF SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED TO REZONE TRACT 1, JOHN CONDRA SURVEY, ABSTRACT 311, FROM 1F-9-ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS TO 1F-8-1500-ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND APPROXIMATELY 425 FEET NORTH OF STARNES ROAD) RECESSED Page 4 May 23, 1983 •12. Recessed 13. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis to recess this hearing until the June 13th City Council Meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 14. Councilman Hinkle moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey to recess this hearing. Motion carried 6-0. 15. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Ernest Hedgecock appeared before the Council. Mr. Hedgecock stated that he was representing Mr. Alex Fogelin and his purpose was to have the land divided into 16 lots to build single family dwellings. Councilman Davis asked what Mr. Fogelin proposed. Mr. Hedgecock stated that it was Mr. Fogelin's intention to develop the area and sell to builders. Councilman Davis asked if under a 1F-9 classification the developer had to designate the square footage. Mr. McEntire stated that the developer did have to designate. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Hedgecock of their intention. Mr. Hedgecock stated that they would like to set a minimum of 1,300 square foot homes. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mr. Hedgecock what would happen if the Council set the minimum of 1,500 square feet. Mr. Hedgecock stated that the lots would be harder to market if they did not have the freedom to build 1,300 square foot houses. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-29 RECESSED PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-30, REQUEST OF GAYLORD VAN Y TO REZONE A PORTION OF BLOCK H, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY AND ELDORADO) RECESSED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-30 RECESSED PLANNING & ZONING- PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-31, REQUEST OF ALEX FOGELIN TO REZONE TRACTS 1B & 1B1, WM. D BARNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT 14b, FROM AGRICULTURE TO 1F-9-ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SMITHFIELD ROAD AT THE INTERSECTION OF EVER- GREEN AVENUE AND ~~ SMITHFIELD ROAD) Page 5 May 23, 1983 Mayor Faram asked if there were any drainage problems in the area in question. Mr. Albin stated that there were some problems in the area, that there were 27 inch storm drains between lots 9 and 10 in Crestwood and they were working out easements at the present time. Mayor Faram asked if there were 1,300 square feet houses in the adjoining sub-division. Mr. Horvath stated that Crestwood has a minimum of 1,400 square feet homes. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak in opposition of this request Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 16. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Newman to approve PZ 83-31 with the stipulation of a minimum require- ment of 1, 500 square foot homes . Motion carried 4-3, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, Councilmen Davis and Newman voting for; Councilmen Fisher, Kenna and Councilwoman Hinkle voting against, and the chair voting for. *17. 18. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one present to speak in favor Mayor Faram called for anyone present to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being no one to speak in opposition of this request Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna that this item be recessed until the June 13th Council Meeting. Motion carried 6-0. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-31 ORDINANCE NO. 1027 APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-35, REQUEST OF ALEX FOGELIN FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1 THRU 16, BLOCK 9, CRESTWOOD ESTATES APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-32, REQUEST OF A.T. ADCOCK AND JAMES RUST TO REZONE TRACT 8, WM. COX SURVEY, ABSTRACT 321, FROM AGRICULTURE TO 1F-9- 1500-ONE FAMILY DWELLING (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STARNES ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,630 FEET WEST OF SMITH- FIELD ROAD AND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY BRIARWOOD ESTATES) RECESSED Page 6 May 23, 1983 19. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis to recess this request until June 13th Council Meeting. Motion carried 6-O. 20. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward . There being no one present to speak in favor of this request Mayor Faram called for anyone to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being no one present to speak in opposition of this request Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna to recess this request until the June 13th Council Meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 21. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to recess this item until the June 13th Council Meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 22. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Burke Collins appeared before the Council. Mr. Collins stated that he was present to represent Dyna- Co. Development requesting a zoning change to build business warehouses. Councilman Kenna asked if there was a zoning map that showed if the property to the East was still zoned multi-family. Mr. Line stated that the map had not been updated recently so it did not reflect current zoning. Mr. Albin stated that the area to the East was still zoned Multi-Family and was zoned Local Retail to the West. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-32 RECESSED PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-33, REQUEST OF QUADRANGLE DEVELOP- MENT COMPANY TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 5, WILLIAM COX SURVEY, ABSTRACT 321, FROM AGRICULTURE AND MULTI- FAMILY TO 1F-9-1500- ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STARNES ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,044 FEET WEST OF SMITH- FIELD ROAD BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY BRIARWOOD ESTATES EXTENDS EASTWAR] TO SMITHFIELD ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 271 FOOT OF FRONTAGE ON SMITHFIELD ROAD) RECESSED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-34 RECESSED PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-34, REQUEST OF DYNA-CO DEVELOPMENT TO REZONE LOT 2, BLOCK b, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO COMMERCIAL (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LEWIS DRIVE AND APPROXIMATELY 212 FEET EAST OF RUFF SNOW Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being no one else to speak Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 23. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to approve this request. Motion carried 6-0. 24. Mayor Faram stated that he received a petition several weeks ago from the property owners on Emerald Oaks Drive to re- construct their street in the same manner as North Hills Drive. *25. *2b. *27. r~ ~~ *28. ,Mayor Faram stated that he had discussed this with the Staff and it was suggested that Emerald Oaks Drive be overlayed by City crews as opposed to adding it to the present contract. Mayor Faram called for anyone present to speak in favor or opposition of this request to please come forward. No one appeared. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey to have the City crews overlay this street as soon as North Hills Drive was completed. Motion carried 6-0. Page 1 May 23, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-34 ORDINANCE 1028 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PETITION FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION ON EMERALD OAKS DRIVE APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH, HALTOM CITY TO TIE INTO NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SEWER LINE APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM GENERAL FUND TO GENERAL CONSTRUCTION FUND APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF BUILDING OFFICIAL POSITION CHANGE APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RATIFYING PURCHASE OF CONTROLS FOR BOOSTER PUMP STATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,898.00 - WATAUGA DRIVE BOOSTER PUMP APPROVED *29. *30. *31. 32. Mr. Line stated the contractor was doing an inadequate job in the North Hills paving project and that the Staff is doing everything they know how to do to try to get them to perform up to specifications. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey directed the Staff to formally document delays, complaints and problems with Stolaruk. He asked if there was any way they could be excluded from receiving future bids. Mr. McEntire stated the Council could reject the bid. Mr. Line stated that payments had been held and we had done everything we could, without the City being liable. Motion carried 6-0 33. Councilman Davis commented on the fine job the contractor was doing in the Snow Heights area and that apparently the project was on schedule and being accomplished in a professional manner. Councilman Davis moved, approve partial payment. seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey to Motion carried b-0. Page 9 May 23, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR RESCUE TOOL "JAWS OF LIFE" APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE ~~3, TO STOLARUK CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $57,701.52 - HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE ~~3, TO STOLARUK CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,809.38 - JERRI JO AND ELDORADO STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVE- MENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTIMATE ~~4, TO STOLARUK CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $103,845.45 - NORTH HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE ~~3, TO AUSTIN ROAD IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,493.35 SNOW HEIGHTS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVE- MENTS APPROVED Page 10 May 23, 1983 Mayor Faram asked the Staff to prepare a historical review on contractors that were not performing to the contract so it could be documented. Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if this would be grounds to eliminate such bids. Mr. McEntire stated yes. 34. None CITIZEN PRESENTATIONS Mayor Faram stated that since there were no citizens presenta- tions and if the Council did not object, after a short recess they would hear items 18, 19, 20 and 21 since it was evident that the parties involved were now present. Council took a short recess. Mayor Faram called the May 23, 1983 Meeting back to order, and asked for a motion to bring items 18, 19, 20, and 21 on the Agenda back up to be heard. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis to bring items 18, 19, 20 and 21 before the Council at this time. Motion carried b-0. 18. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone PLANNING & ZONING - wishing to speak in favor of this request come forward. PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-32, REQUEST OF Mr. Ted Adcock appeared before the Council and stated that A.T. ADCOCK AND JAMES he apologized for James Rust and himself delaying the Council RUST TO REZONE TRACT from hearing this request. 8, WM. COX SURVEY, ABSTRACT 321, FROM Mr. Adcock stated that he and Mr. Rust had intended to build AGRICULTURE TO two large homes on this acreage. 1F-9-1500-ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON Mayor Faram asked how many acres were involved. THE SOUTH SIDE OF STARNES ROAD, Mr. Adcock stated 11.1 acres. APPROXIMATELY 1,630 FEET WEST OF Mayor Faram asked if money had been escrowed for drainage. SMITHFIELD ROAD AND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH Mr. Adcock stated yes. BY BRIARWOOD ESTATES) APPROVED Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. r~ u Page 11 May 23, 1983 19. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to approve PZ 83-32. Motion carried 6-0. 20. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to re- open Item ~~20. Motion carried 6-0. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to come forward. Mr. Walter Elliott came forward and apologized for the delay and assured the Council that it would not happen again. Mr. Elliott stated that he was representing Mr. Bill Pasteur, President of Quadrangle Development and stated that they requested a zoning change for a 24.6 acre tract of land from agricultural to single family dwellings. Mr. Elliott stated that Mr. Pasteur had been a builder for approximately 10 years doing business primarily in the Euless area. Mr. Elliott stated that it was Quandrangle's intention to build single family dwelling in the area with the minimum of 1,500 square feet of living area. Mayor Faram asked about the drainage problems in this area. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-32 ORDINANCE N0. 1029 APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-33, REQUEST OF QUADRANGLE DEVELOP- MENT COMPANY TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 5, WILLIAM COX SURVEY, ABSTRACT 321, FROM AGRICULTURE AND MULTI- FAMILY TO 1F-9-1500- ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STARNES ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,044 FEET WEST OF SMITH- FIELD ROAD, BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY BRIARWOOD ESTATES, AND EXTENDS EASTWARD TO SMITHFIELD ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 271 FOOT OF FRONTAGE ON SMITHFIELD ROAD) APPROVED Mr. Albin stated that a portion did drain to Calloway Branch through Morgan Meadows but the City was in the process of acquiring easements at the present time. Mr. Albin stated that there was flood problems at the present time in Morgan Meadows. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mr. Elliott if he knew the average square footage of the houses in the Kingswood Estate Addition and if he didn't mind him asking, why were they asking for 1,500 square feet? Mr. Elliott stated that he was told if he asked for anything less than that he probably would not get it. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that it was a different kind of request that a developer would put single family residences around multi-family. Mr. Elliott stated that there would be a full disclosure of the developments around and that the single family residents would be fully aware of how the surrounding area was zoned and developed. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Elliott if 1,500 was a realistic figure. Mr. Elliott stated that he would pass that question to Mr. Pasteur, who was also present. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North~Richland Hills Cit Hall Coun y cil Cha~abers, 1301 N,E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m, on . t~n~ 7 19~~ - h'G'~t~E ~ ITEM ACTION TAI~,EEN all to Order oll Call ___.. avocation nsideration of Minutes of the Recessed yet in~_ June 13 , 1983 .-~~.. ' on of Minutes of the Re ular Meetin June 13, 1983 6. _ Consideration of Removing Item (s) From Consent A enda 7. Consideration of Consent Agenda (Items ~~22, ...~ 23 24 and 25) _ ...~, ..... ~~ _.. _~. Conside~rartion of A ointment to Civil .._._ Service Commission - __.~ Consideration of Appointments to Cable _ .~.~ Advisory Panel _ -- r .r. ~ r ,_ 1 Consideration of Appointments to Board of Ad'ustment __~___ .~., -- Page 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Far the Meet~.ng conducted at the North~Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 1301 N.E. Loop 820, at 1;34 p.m, on June 21, 1983 N~JMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 11 •' bl' ~ Hearin - Re uest of CBS Black Hawk unications for Rate Increase a he June 13 1983 Meetin 12• ON G - PUBLIC HEARING - f Dan J. Anderson D,V.M. o n of Tract lOF Thomas -__. rac ___ 1210 , From Art icul ture Located :~- on the West Side of ------..w ' ma el 600 Feet 'on of Shadv Grove r~r~..,-.,.r~~ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-35 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-36, Request of P & S Construction Com any to Rezone Tract 13A, Stephen .._.._. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, and a Portion of Lot 4 and Lots 5 thru 7, Block 1 Meadowview Estates from Agriculture to 1F-12 and 1F-9 to 1F-8-1600 and 1F-8-1800- One Family Dwellings (Located on the North _. -- _. Side of Rumfield Road, Extends Approximatel r~_____ 1,090 Feet a~nd~Approximately 666 Feet East of Davis Boulevard} ----.-1 ...~. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-36 1 t Page 3 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ror the. Meeting conducted at the North~Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 1301 N,E, Loop 820, at 7:30 p,m, on __ „___,, ,T,mP 2 7 . ,198 Ni1MBER~ ITEM ACTION TAKEN CANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Re uest of Dominion Properties Rezone Tracts 7E 7F & 7K, T.K. Martin ve Abstract 1055 From A riculture to - -14 -One Famil Dwellin s (Located on . ide of Martin Road, Bounded on and North b Glenann addition and ~w ' tel 800 Feet West of Crane Road) ..~_ ~ ' o of Ordinance for PZ 83-37 .~.$_ G - PUBLIC HEARING P~ R~-40, ReQu of Frank Kimmell Trustee, 12 & 12A John Barlou h and Tract 2 William ._...w _ , --.---.. ~ I010 From A ricultur ...~.. - -1~;_ 1F-8-1400 and 1F-8 1200-One --- a ed on the South Side w -~-~.- o nded on the West b ,~ - - - _.. ~, ~~ ;~~ ,%°' Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-40 ~~~ r -.~.,,,. ,..~,,,,,_, _ t ~i ,, ..~.. ,'. ', i 1 Page 4 CITY OF NORTH kICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North~Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 1:30 p.m, on June 27 1983 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 20~~ PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - e t of Folsom Investments one 1.44 Acres out of ranch Addition From - o ated 21 • t ' an of Ordinance for PZ 83-41 .~... *22.. Consideration of .Bud et Su lenient for the w„ rary - .,~ *2,~,~ ~on ideration of Awardin Bid for Seal „ .. '°`..~4.:... 'on of Partial Payment, Estimate •r +~ ' of 40 40b .82 to Stola~ruk~~ ~~ N YAK _. .~~~~ls Street and Drainage Improvement ._. - _.. *z n f artial Pa ment Estimate 4.~.i~_ t Amo,~nt of ,~3, 034.30 to Stola~ruk- _. ~~„ ._..._....~ Ho ida~„j~,,,, Street and Drainage r ---'~-------------- ~~.... ...~~.. .r~.~.r~rrr~r~ it i~r~r ~rw.~~ ~~uest of B. R_ glories :.he_ Brick Ordinance _____ w.rr~~ 0 ~ ~ ' CITY OF NORTH RiCHLAND HILLS • Page 5. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North~Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 130 N,E, Loop 820, at 1:30 p,m, on June 27,.1983 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 27. Citizen Presentation Mr. Gary Bryant - T.C.O.A.D.A Re: Support from Alcohol Tax Funds 28. Adjournment r"~'r r+~r r.rw.r ~rw.r~" » +.f.rs. ,,,, ~~ ww~r • rrr ~.~ .r........• ...rr r~r ..+..~..w•~.~.. r .~. .w.+ ..,.... ~...... war. ~. r..r•r..r.~.n..r. rr~rrw.raw.ri+i~ . r_r...rr. +~..~~ w..r.rr~ i.....r r - , wwwrr w+.ww.r~ ..r.wrr ,~ ,:.. .~"' MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TERAS, HELD IN THE. CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, JUNE 13, 1983 - 7:30 P.M, 1 Ma or Faram called the meeting to order June 13, 1983, at CALL TO ORDER y 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor Jim Ramsey Mayor Pro Tem Jim Kenna Councilman Richard Davis Councilman J.C. Hubbard Councilman Dick Fisher Councilman Harold Newman Councilman Marie Hinkle Councilwoman Staff: Rodger Line City Manager Jeanette Moore City Secretary Rex McEntire City Attorney Lou Spiegel Director of Finance John Whitney Purchasing Agent Richard Albin City Engineer Gene Riddle Director Public Works-Utility Absent: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager 3. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the regul ar meeting of May 23, 1983. Motion carried 6-0; Councilman Hubbard abstaining due to absence from the meeting. Mayor Faram stated he would ask far a motion to hear Item ~~23 at this time in the interest of the economy of the City. ' Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to hear Item ~~23 at this time, due to the fact that someone was being paid by the hour and it would probably be several hours before the Council got to Item ~~23. Motion carried 7-0. 23. Mr. McEntire stated that Mr. Jimmy Smith, Consultant, would give the Council a report. Mr. Smith appeared before the Council. . Mr. Smith stated he had analyzed the request of CBS/Black Hawk in relation to the service provided the City of North Richland Hills. Mr. Smith stated this was a competitive firm and had competition from network television, pay television and home movies. Mr. Smith stated the rate structure of the company CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING MAY 23, 1983, APPROVED PUBLIC HEARING CBS/BLACK HAWK COMMUNICATIONS - RATE INCREASE REQUEST RECESSED Page 2 was extremely important in respect to investor risk factor and with respect to customer demand. Mr. Smith stated that if the company's rates are out of alignment with either customer preference or willingness to pay the stated rate for the service, then the company will suffer in number of subscribers they have for their services. Mr. Smith stated the requested rate the company was seeking to place into effect would have a net effect of increasing company revenue by 48%. Mr. Smith stated-that Black Hawk operates independently for lbb days a year and CBS operates the system for the last 199 days of the year. Mr. Smith stated there had been some improvement in terms of monetary loss since CBS came into the system. Mr. Smith stated that as far as current rates were concerned the revenues produced were one million and a half dollars on a twelve month basis and the revenues to be produced at the revised rates would be two million one hundred sixty six dollars. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he was going to move that this request be postponed until the next Council Meeting so the Council could have the opportunity to absorb the figures. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that it was hard for him to believe CBS would buy a loser and that CBS would come in and buy Black Hawk when they were in a losing status. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that it would have been helpful if the report given the Council had shown the current revenues versus the revised rate. Mayor Faram asked how many subscribers there were in North Richland Hills. Mr. Smith stated 5,784 in 1982. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. No one appeared. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem .Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to recess any action on this request until the June 27, 1983, Council Meeting. Motion Carried 7-0. Page 3 4. Councilman Kenna removed Item ~~18, Councilman Davis removed Item ~~9. CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEM(S) FROM CONSENT AGENDA 5. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve consent agenda Items ~~8, 10, 13, 14, 15, lb, 17, 19, 20&22. Motion carried 7-0. F ram resented Mr. Bob Dunlop, Police Department and 6. Mayor a P r certif i- Mr. Charlie Howard, Fire Department with a five yea sate and service pin. 7. Mr. Stratton was not present. *8. 9. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PS 83-45 subject to the Engineer's comments except ~~3, 4, b, 7 & I0. Councilman Davis asked the City Engineer if he felt the existing culverts under the railroad could handle the drainage and if the railroad had been notified. Councilman Davis also asked about the drainage downstream. Mr. Albin stated the engineer had checked and the existing culvert could handle a ten year frequently storm. CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ~~8, 10, 13, 14, I5, Ib, 17, 19, 20 & 22 APPROVED PRESENTATION OF FIVE YEAR CERTIFICATE AND SERVICE PIN TO BOB DUNLOP - POLICE DEPARTMENT -CHARLIE HOWARD - FIRE DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION OF AW FROM THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO RUSSEL STRATTON PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-43, REQUEST OF C~tO S S ROAD S DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND BURK COLLINS '~ INVESTMENTS FOR REPEAT OF LOTS 4R-2, BLOCK 10, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RUFI SNOW DRIVE AND NORTH OF THE PROPOSED MEADOW CREST DRIVE} APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-45, REQUEST OF KENNETH C. WHITLEY FOR FINAL PLAT OF OA HILLS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD} l T T1 T1 /~ T T T T1 Page 4 Mr. Albin stated the sub-division ordinance required 'that the drainage betaken to a recognized drainage channel downstream. Mr. Albin stated that he had not been given any evidence that the channel downstream from the culvert was sufficient to handle .a ten year frequently storm. Mr. Albin stated the question had come up on whether the ordinance covered the downstream channel in addition to the culvert. The question was did the developers' responsibility end at the culvert or at the channel located downstream from the culvert. Mr. Albin stated that in regards to the ponding of water at the railroad, he had not received enough evidence from the developers' engineer to determine the extent of ponding there would be. Mr. Albin stated that at some point in time the culvert under the railroad would have to be enlarged. Councilman Davis asked who would have to put the culvert in. Mr. Albin stated the developer could be required to do it at this time or the railroad might make the requirement. The developer had not received a permit from the railroad. Councilman Davis asked if it was possible the railroad would require an additional culvert. Mr. Albin stated yes. Councilman Davis asked if the railroad did require a larger culvert, was there possibly a need for some channelization downstream. Mr. Albin stated yes, if the culvert was enlarged. Mr. Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Long stated he had talked with the owners of the property downstream and they had agreed, with their assistance and cooperation, to clean out the channel and improve it. Mr. Long stated that in regards to the culvert at the railroad, there was a 4 X 4 culvert there now. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Long if the railroad required a larger culvert would he be willing to put it in. Mr. Long stated that if the railroad required a larger culvert the developer would have to put it in. Councilman Davis moved to amend the motion to state "approve PZ 83-45, subject to all the engineers' comments and showing on the plat the minimum finished floor elevations at least one foot above the railroad and written approval be given the City Staff from the railroad that water was being discharged to their right-of-way and they agree to it and written acknowledgment from Texas Electric Service Company that water was being discharged on their right-of-way". Page 5 Amended motion died for the lack of a second. Original motion carried 7-0. *10. 11. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward . Mr. Marion Massey, 2101 Airport Freeway, representing W. Brown appeared before the Council. u Mr. Massey stated they had worked diligently to work out a suitable plan with Haltom City and North Richland Hills. I Mr. Massey stated that Haltom City had approved the request with no opposition. Mr. Massey stated that there had been meetings with the citizens in North Richland Hills who had objections to the request and most had been neutralized. Mr. Massey stated they did have 48 signatures of residents within 200 feet that were for the project, 50 signatures of residents not within 200 feet and signatures of three that had asked to be removed from the petition in opposition to the request. Mr. Massey stated this project came to light because two investors wanted to build a golf course in the flood plain. Mr. Massey stated they planned to build the golf course, repair the dams on the lakes, to pay for a u-turn bridge at the intersection of Loop 820 and Rufe Snow Drive. Mr. Massey stated they planned to build multi-family in Phase I and II, between Loop 820 and TESCO right-of-way, bordered on the west by the railroad track and build condominiums on Phase II. Mr. Massey showed the Council a lay-out of the proposed development. Mr. Massey stated that Phase I and II were zoned Local Retail in 1914. The present developer purchased it in 191b and at that time did rely on the fact that it was Local Retail and at that time multi-family could be located in Local Retail zoning. Mr. Massey stated that Phase III was zoned multi-family in 1974, but since that time it had been zoned back to single family. . Mr. Massey stated they had done a traffic study on Phase III by using a formula and traffic generated by a shopping center which, under the present zoning, would create three times more traffic than, multi-family. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-49, REQUEST OF ALAN W. HAMNI FOR REPEAT OF LOTS 8R, 9~ AND IOR, LONGSDALE ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AT HARWOOD ROAD} PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-25, REQUEST OF W. BROWN, CUSTOM BUILDERS INCORPORATE TO REZONE TRACTS OF LAND IN W. A. TRIMBLE SURVEY ABSTRACT 1520 R.P. BURTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 115, AND T. AKERS SURVEY, ~, ABSTRACT 19, FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGRICULTURE AND LOCAL RETAIL TO MULTI- FAMILY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIFIC USE - GOLF COURSE (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NORTHEAST LOOP 820 AND BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY MEADOW LAKES ADDITION AND ON THE SOUTH BY FOSSIL CREE TRAILS ADDITION) ' Page b Mr. Massey stated the developer had made the following commitments to the homeowners: ' ~~1. Build the golf course and assure that it would be done by putting up a performance bond. ~~2. Pay for a turn-around bridge at the intersection of Loop $20 and Rufe Snow Drive. ~~3. Confine the multi-family to the west side of Colonial Parkway, north of the TESCO right- o f -way . ~~4. Repair the dam on the lake. Mr. Massey stated the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the plan subject to two additional commitments. Mr. Massey stated they agreed to comply with the exception of five acres next to ,the lake being provided and paying for the construction of an access road on the south side of Loop 820. Mr. Massey stated the developer agreed to construct a six foot masonry fence on the north line of the TESCO right-of-way to .shield the single family residents from the multi-family and limit the first row of multi-family units to one story. Mr. Massey stated that Phase III would be single family and condominiums on the west side of Colonial Parkway. Mr. Massey stated they had agreed that until such time the dam would be repaired and the developer escrowed money with the City for the turn-a-round bridge no permits would be issued. Mr. Massey stated they had put together a workable plan. Councilman Hubbard asked if permission had been obtained from the Texas Water Board to make improvements to the lakes. Mr. Massey stated yes. Councilman Hubbard stated that with regards to the bridge, he had a meeting with officials from the Highway Department and they had advised him that it would take a contract with the City to construct it and it would be approximately seven years before the bridge could be built. Mr. Massey stated seven years was six times the time frame given them. . Councilman Hubbard stated the Highway Department also advised him the bridge would cost in excess of one million dollars. Councilman Kenna asked it both dams would be repaired. Mr. Massey replied yes. Councilman Fisher asked if Haltom City has approved the plan. Page 7 Mr. Massey replied yes. Councilman Fisher stated that the plat showed access from Colonial Parkway down to the club house. Mr. Massey stated that was a private street that they had consented to build. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he could not understand why someone would take a nice area like Meadow Lakes and build apartments on it. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked if it was because the homes in Meadow Lakes could not be sold. Mr. Masse stated the apartments were an economic factor. Y Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mr. Massey if he was familiar with deed restrictions. Mr. Massey stated yes. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he realized that deed restrictions were a civil matter, but the deed restrictions in Meadow Lakes stated the homeowners owned the lake. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that whatever the developer said he was going to do was strictly a moral obligation and he did not feel the improve- . ments to the lake could legally be a part of the zoning. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he felt the lakes were a civil matter so why was so much money being spent on all the amenities just to be able to build multi-family. Mr. Massey stated it was obvious that single family homes were not going to develop in Phase I and II. Mayor Pro~Tem Ramsey stated there were a number of acres in the area already zoned far apartments and he felt the City was going to get apartment poor over night. Councilwoman Hinkle asked how large the condominiums would be. Mr. Bob Worrell, General Manager of Custom Builders, stated they had proposed 1,100 square feet and deed restrictions if sold. Mayor Faram stated that discussion had taken place on closing off Colonial Parkway at TESCO right-of-way and Meadow Lakes Drive so traffic could only turn south. Also, there would be another opening easterly to the access road and use the access road as the entrance to the apartment complex. Mr. Massey stated they had investigated that passibility and . it would greatly affect the fire insurance rating. Mayor Faram stated he was concerned with putting all that traffic in the neighborhood. Councilman Newman asked what the time element was on building the bridge. Page 8 Mr. Massey stated that it was indicated by Mr. Stone of the Highway Department that it would take eight months to let a contract. Councilman Davis asked that if the access road was not built from Colonial Parkway to Ruf a Snow, if someone wanted to go to the west, they would have to enter on to Loop 820 and exit right back off . Mr. Massey stated that was correct. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Massey if he thought the Highway Department would build the access road. Mr. Massey stated yes, if the traffic warranted it. Councilman Davis asked who would own the lakes and maintain them. Mr. Massey stated the developer owned the lakes. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Massey if he would have a problem with putting a time schedule on occupancy permits until the bridge was completed. 6 Mr. Massey stated that if it took seven years to build the bridge the apartments would never be built. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he had paid $9.00 for a copy of deed restrictions that were no good. Mr. Massey stated that if the homeowners agreed to the deed restrictions they were good. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he wanted to point out that. the deed restrictions concerning the lakes was s civil matter. Councilman Fisher stated he was concerned about the traffic that would be put on Meadow Lakes Drive and asked about the possibility of making a one-way from Meadow Lakes to the north side of TESCO which would allow traffic to go out of Meadow Lakes, to Loop 820. Mr. Massey stated they would have no problem with that. Councilwoman Hinkle asked if it was correct that the City would issue no permits until the money was escrowed for the bridge. Mr. Massey stated that was correct. S 1. . Councilman Davis asked that if making Colonial from Meadow Lakes to the TESCO right-of-way a one way north bound would, if fulfilled, meet the requirement for fire protection. Mr. Massey stated yes. Mr. Bill Fenimore, 6041 Riveria, appeared before the Council. Mr. Fenimore stated he was a developer in the City also and he was ver much•in favor of the request. Mr. Fenimore stated y he felt this plan would be much better than a shopping center and be an asset to the City. Mr. David Reason, 6545 Lakeside, appeared before the Council. Page 9 Mr. Reasor stated he felt the proposal would keep the sub- division growing. Mr. Reason stated he was attracted to the area because of the lakes and felt they made the area unique. Ma or Faram advised that the lakes were not a part of the y zonin issue, the City could not require the developer to fix g the lakes.Mr. Reason stated he would like to see the Council make the developer escrow the money to fix the lakes. Ma or Faram stated he did not think the Council could require , y that. Mr. Reason stated he felt the golf course would enhance the area and the proposal would also increase the tax base. Mr. Reason stated he appreciated the changes the developers had made for the homeowners. Mr. E. F. Crites, III, 6050 Circleview, appeared before the Council. Mr. Crites stated he had signed a petition in opposition to ' the request, however he was for it with the following stipula- t ions 1. The apartments had a minimum of 1,100 square feet. 2. Condominiums be 1,600 square feet. 3. Five acre park be delegated. 4, Both dams be repaired and the walls be a minimum of 25 year life or to State specifications. 5. Bridge at Loop 820 be constructed before any building permits were issued. Mr. Tim Hogan, 6401 Riveria, appeared before the Council. Page 10 Mr. Hogan stated he felt this was a very well and effective plan. Mr. Hogan stated the homes in Meadow Lakes. had not retained their market value because the lakes and development was not completed. Mr. Hogan stated he felt the present developer had made for provisions to handle the traffic and that it would be a good development. Mr. John Mayberry, 6405 Riveria, appeared before the Council. Mr. Mayberry stated he was one of the first to move into Meadow Lakes. Mr. Mayberry stated he knew the cost of building and felt this proposal would be the best deal for the neighborhood and the City. Mr. Mayberry stated he was President of Meadow Lakes Association, which was not the association referred to in the deed restrictions. Mr. Mayberry stated the Meadow Lakes Association had a meeting and 24 members unanimously voted to approve this plan. Mr. Willie Wilson, 4813 Woodcreek, appeared before the Council. Mr. Wilson stated he f eft it was a fine proposal and would enhance the neighborhood. Mr. Wilson stated he was very much in favor of the proposal. Mr. T. D. Harton, 3805 Diamond Loch East, appeared before the Council. Mr. Harton stated he felt this was a good proposal and was the best plan for the property. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to please come forward. Mr. Bobby Heath, 6104 Riveria, appeared before the Council. Mr. Heath stated he was a property owner within two hundred feet of the property,that the development as it stood, with the density that was proposed, would lead quickly to a 10% increase in population in North Richland Hills. Mr. Heath stated an increase in population would lead to increased traffic at Rufe Snow and Loop 820, which is already a congested intersection. Mr. Heath stated he would like to suggest an alternative development south of the TESCO right-of-way where so many condominiums were to be built to put single family dwellings. Mr. Heath stated he was very much opposed to the request. Mr. John Nash, 5000 Lakeview Circle, appeared before the • Council. Mr. Nash stated that when he purchased his home he asked for a copy of the deed restrictions. Mr. Nash stated the deed restrictions helped in the decision to purchase the home because the developer and any subsequent developer would have to develop single family residences until 1999. Page 11 Councilman Davis advised Mr. Nash the City could not 'inforce deed restrictions. Mr. Nash stated he understood the City-could not enforce the restrictions. Mr. John Harveston, 4821 Lake Side Circle, appeared before the Council. Mr. Harveston stated he was not for or against the request, he wondered if the proposal would fit into the area. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that it would. Mr. Albert McDaniel IV, b409 Meadow Lakes, appeared before the Council. Mr. McDaniel-stated he thought the Council would consider the request as the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended. Mr. McDaniel stated he felt the golf course was a gimmick. He thought the property next to the lake would be stipulated as a ark and felt that there should be a park around the lake. P Mr. Dave Freeman, 6549 Spring River Lane, appeared before the Council. e Mr. Freeman stated the developer had done a fantastic job in presenting the proposal and made many concessions. Mr. Freeman stated he felt there were many present who thought the Cit was going to guarantee the concessions and he would like Y for someone to make the guarantee. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Freeman that if the previous developer had at one time promised a lot around the lake for access and for some reason sold the lot. Mr. Freeman stated that was correct. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Freeman if he knew whether the previous developer had promised to fix the lakes. Mr. Freeman replied this promise had been made. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Freeman if he knew why the lakes had been drained. Mr. Freeman stated the lakes were drained because they were condemned by the State. Mr. Freeman asked what assurance could be given the people • that the bridge would be built. Mr. McEntire stated that no permits would be issued until the money was escrowed for the bridge. Page 12 Mr. Freeman asked if there was any kind of guarantee 'the lakes would be fixed. Mr. McEntire stated no. Mr. Massey stated they planned to put up a bond and cash escrow for the lakes. Councilman Hubbard advised Mr. Freeman that in answer to his question concerning the bridge, he had been advised by the Highway Department that there was a chance a crossing over the highway would not be granted and an outside chance they would never approve it. Mr. Freeman asked Councilman Hubbard if he was saying there was a chance the State would not grant it. Councilman Hubbard replied yes. Councilman Davis asked if a time schedule could be placed on the plan and if the schedule was not met the plan voided. Mr. McEntire stated yes. Mr. John Mayberry stated that in reference to the lot that the previous developer had offered, the homeowners told him thanks but no thanks because they did not want the responsibility of keeping clean. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 12. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he wanted clarification on the petition. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he found out at 3:00 p.m, today that there was not a legal petition, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he was advised that the petition was void because there was .not enough signatures of property owners of 20% of the effected area. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked when the procedure of verifying petitions changed, in the past tl'ie mail out list was .used and not the effected area. Mr. McEntire stated there was not enough signatures either by using the mail out list or the affected area. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that according to the ordinance he had, it did not meet the ,requirements of planned development. Mr. McEntire stated that if the request was approved the Council would have to instruct him to draft a specif is ordinance. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-25 ORDINANCE N0. 1033 APPROVED Mr. McEntire stated it was in compliance. Page I3 Ma or Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to y deny PZ 83-25. Councilman Davis asked Mr. McEntire that if this request was a roved, with stipulations could he draft an ordinance PP covering the stipulations and make it binding. Mr. McEntire replied yes. Councilman Fisher• asked at what point and time stipulations could be added or removed. Ma or Faram stated that would go into the motion should this y motion fail and anew motion made. Motion failed by a vote of 5-2; Councilmen Kenna, Fisher, Newman, Davis and Councilwoman Hinkle voting against; Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey an Councilman Hubbard voting for. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PZ $3-25 with the following stipulations and an ordinance be drawn up by the City Attorney containing the stipulations. ~~1. Escrow money with the City for the estimated cost of the left turn bridge and any other cost above and beyond the estimated cost. Also the bridge would have to be accepted by the State of Texas and they would issue the contract before any permits could be issued on the multi-family north of TESCO. ~~2. The condominiums in Phase III be 1,000 square feet minimum. ~~3. Performance bond to be furnished to the City for construction of the golf course. A performance bond for the completion of the lakes forwarded to the City before any building permits for any tract would be issued. Also the ordinance would state the City would not maintain the lakes. ~~4. A six foot masonry wall to be built on the north line of the TESCO line abutting the apartments on the south side. Also within 150 feet north of TESCO the apartments to be one story only. ~~5. Colonial Parkway to be one-way north from TESCO right-of-way to Meadow Lakes Drive ~~6. Site plans would be approved by the Planning and . Zoning Commission and the City Council on all tracts before development could begin. . Page 14 Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated the motion contained many good things, but did not think the Council should approve it as a package. Councilman Davis stated he felt that all of the things in the ' motion would have to be done to be an asset to the City. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he could not see them having to go back to the Planning and Zoning Commission every time, they either had a planned development or did not and they could go to the Staff to work it out. Mayor Faram asked if Councilman Davis meant they would have to go back thru Planning and Zoning each time. Councilman Davis stated no, for instance on tract one, a site plan would have to be submitted and reviewed by City Staff, Planning and Zoning Commission, City Engineer and Council. Councilman Davis stated it was really a platting matter. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he would like to strike them having to go back to Planning and Zoning. ' Councilman Davis stated he should have used the word plat instead of site plan. Mayor Faram asked. if it would satisfy everyone if Planning and Zoning Commission was deleted. Councilman Davis agreed and Councilman Kenna agreed. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard to amend the motion to state "turn Meadow Lakes Drive into a cul- de-sac just before it got to Colonial Parkway". After further discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey withdrew his motion. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to al«end the motion to state "make a cul-de-sac on Colonial Parkway north to TESCO right-of-way". Motion failed by a vote of 5-2; Councilmen Kenna, Davis, Fisher, Newman and Councilwoman Hinkle voting against;~Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey and Councilman Hubbard voting for. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to amend item ~~4 of the motion to state "the first group of buildings north of TESCO next to the wall be single story". Motion carried 6-1; Councilmen Kenna, Davis, Hubbard, Fisher an Newman and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey voting against. Page 15 Original motion as amended carried by a vote of 5-2; ' Councilmen Kenna, Davis, Fisher and Newman and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey and Councilman Hubbard voting against. *13. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE /14, TO UNIVERSAL TANK d IRC WORKS, INC. , IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,702.00 - DAVIS BOULEVARD 2. M.G. STORAGE TANK APPROVED *14. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE //4 TO AUST1 ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,050. 1£ - SNOW HEIGHTS STRE1 AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *15. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE /18 AND FIN: TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUI OF $22,284.63 - ONY.; DRIVE AND DAWN DRIV; PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *16. CONSIDERATION OF CONSTRUCTING RIGHT- TURN LANE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE A' NORTHEAST LOOP 8L. APPROVED *17. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE CONTROL::' WATER AND SEWER TAP; ORDINANCE NO. 103- APPROVED • £ 18. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to CONSIDERATION OF approve Ordinance no 1035, delete last sentence in ORDINANCE FOR THE paragraph two. ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDIN Motion carried 7-0. ORDINANCE NO. 103- APPROVED Page 16 *19, X20. ZI. Mr. McEntire presented the following resolution: RESOLUTION N0. 83-14 BE IT RESOLVED by the Cit Counci of North Richland . H' Y l of the City ills, Texas, that: 1, The schedule of rates f fled b Tex Service Company on June 9 Y as Electric 1983, be and is hereby suspended for one hundred and twent 12 rate-effective Y ( 0) days from the date (July 14, 1983). Councilman Davis moved, seconded b to approve Resolu Y Councilman Kenna, Lion No. 83-14, Motion carried 7-0, *22, 23. Heard at the beginnin of the g meeting. 24. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to grant an appeal hearing on PZ 83-15 and PZ 83- heard on July 25, 1983. 16, to be Motion carried 1-0. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE .CHANGING THE NAMES OF CEF ~N STREETS ORDINANCE N0. 1036 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR GENERAL LIABILITY AND PROPERTY INSURANCE (BIDS TO BE OPENED JUNE 13, 1983} APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR RATE INCREASE RESOLUTION 83-14 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR SELF-PROPELLED SWEEPER APPROVED PUBLIC HEARING - CBS BLACK HAWK COMMUNICATIONS - RATE INCREASE REQUEST RECESSED CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING AN APPEAL HEARING ON PZ 83-15 AND PZ 83-16 - JAMES RUST APPROVED r • u P. 0.8~ -- it 3ca L E = t ~~: 50 METES & BOUNDS 0 ao m 0 N ~~ ~_ H 0 BEING a par t of a 10-acre trac t of Abst. 499 ~ land out of the J.B. Edens said tract conveyed by deed to B Survey, In Vol. 3095, Pa e 593 of •L• Ballard et ux and recorded bean ;~ g the Deed Records of Tarrant Cou g ore fully described as follows; nty, Texas, BEGINNING at a steel rod for the port tract of•land' hWest corner of herein descri said rod being located 1951, bed 1S7I.2 of the southwe 3 feet north and S 89 28' E st corner of said Edens Surve ~ ' Y~ THENCE North, 83°44' East aeon a corner loca g fence 3~~6:6~~~feet to a steel ro ted In the east fence Ilne~of sal d for d Ballard 70- acres; THENCE South along said east f ' ence line 20~•g feet to a steel rod corner located on the north line of a for 50 roadway; THENCE Narth 82°59' West alon sai ' for corner g d north line 317,1 feet to a ste el rod THENCE North 133.6 feet to 'the oint ' acres of land, p of beginning and containin 1,2' g 3 ~z ss_as' P~ ~,~ 3) SO ~ Rp~WA Y VlCt ~ MAP N.T.8. Tract 2~, J,B. Edens Surve Abst. No. 499. Y. NB9'44~E- .• M ~~ ~\ . , ORDINANCE N0. ~0~ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE ~~119, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, .. _ AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING~COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-28 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to 1F-9-1500-One Family Dwellings. BEING a part of a 70 acre tract of land out of the J. B. Edens Survey:, Abstract 499, saidtract conveyed by deed to B. L. Ballard et ux'and recorded in Volume 3095, Page 593 of the Deed:Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more fully described'as follows: _ ~ f BEGINNING ;at a steel rod for the northwest corner of herein described_ ^' L tract of land, said rod being located 1951.3 feet north and South 89 degrees 28 minutes East, 1511.2 of the southwest corner of said Edens Survey; THENCE North 83 degrees 44 minutes East along a fence 316.6 feet to a steel rod for corner located in the east fence line of said-Ballard 70 acres; ~ '~ THENCE South along said east fence line 206.8 feet to a steel rod for corner located on the north line of a 50 foot roadway; THENCE North 82 degrees 59 minutes West along said north line 317.1 feet to a steel rod for corner; THENCE North 133.6 feet to the point of beginning and containing I.23 acres of land. ~~ ••. l~ Page. 2 This property is located at east of Stonybrooke Drive at the end of Hightower Drive and is approximately 866 feet west of Eden Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 28th DAY OF APRIL, 1983. . CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND~ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING~AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE N~0. `~ FZ-83-28 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS .DAY OF .. _f DICK FARAM, MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND~HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - . }-'. ,tip. ~:~. .. . ^ DATE: June 8, 1983 SUBJECT:, PZ 83-29 1F-9-~~One Famil Dwellin to 1F-8-1500-One Famil Dwellin r~ Tract 1, John Condra Surve Abstract 311 DEPARTMENT: Plannin and Zonin - BACKGROUND: This or ert is located on the east side of f Ru a Snow hive and is ,, a roximatel 425 feet north of Starnes Road. There were 18 ro ert owners contacted with no~one contestin . h han ~ ~~ and onin on~n' ssion recommer~.ded a roval of onin re est. ~ ~ ' This request was recessed at the May 23,,1983 Council Meeting. ,,. GIT~ COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ::::`DGETED ITEM: `DES NO --~--_ --N~-____ ACCOUNT NUMBER: ~ ~ ~ .~ • Page 20 . . ~, ~~~ ~ P ~ Z Minutes •.~k ~ 4 ~ April 28, 1983 ~, - .a ~. ~ 12 PS 83-38 ~~ :. . ~~ ., ., .... i~ ..s E 11 I ~~ ~~ PS 83-38 'APPROVED 13. PZ 83-29 ~._. Request of Wayne E. Waters for preliminary plat of Lots 2b thru 2 , Block 15, Stonybrooke Addition. Delbert Stembridge came f o , ard, He stated they had receive a Ciry Engineer's comments a 'take no exception to them. ~~~~ ~~ Chairman Tuck , said Hightower Drive is an 80 fo, right of way and you have onl 'showed a 15 foot dedicated ` right way. ,Stembridge said he would correct this. Chairman Tucker asked if they were aware they would have to put in half of the street. Mr. Stembridge said they understand that. ~- L Mr. Hannon asked if the city pays for • the oversized street, • i ~ T Chairman Tucker said he believed they did. Mr. Wood 'made the motion to approve PS 83-38 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-O, Request of Southland Financial Services, Inc. to rezone Tract 1, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its present classification of 1F-9-One ~ . Family Dwellings to a proposed classification of 1F-8-1500-one Family Dwellings. This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive and is approximately 425 feet north of Starnes Road. The Chairman opened the Public Hezring and called for those k~ishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. ~. .. . '~ Page 21 P & Z Minutes ,~ April 28, 1983 ,/" f ,~ ,; . ~. 0 PZ 83-29 APPROVED ~._ ., ., Jim Harris with Southland Financial came forward . He said this would. be an additional phase of Foster Village, He said this property has been zoned for 10 years, but they are requesting this change because of demographics and need to keep the cost of the lots down, but keep the house size the same. Mr. Harris said there is 1F-8 zoning _ on some property to the south next to the school and there is also some duplex zoning to the south. He said the property to the west is 6,000 square-foot lots. Mr. Harris said they plan to keep a buffer of 1F-9 to the south, but will develop it at the same time as this property. Mr. Wood asked how many additional lots this change would make, . .~ -- Mr. Harris said there would be r approximately 19 additional lots, Mr. Hannon asked if this property was platted.. E Mr. Harris said they platted this property, but because of a drainage problem down stream, it was never recorded. He said they have worked with the city in getting the needed easements and believe this problem has been worked out. The Chairman called for those wishing ~to speak in opposition to this request - to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 83-29. This notion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 3-2 with Mr. Tucker and Mr. Bowen voting against. • • , t\. ~- ~ KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. • CONSUITiNG ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas Apri 1 15, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hi 11 s 1341 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 16118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83:29, IF-9 TO IF-8, GRID 49 We have received .the referenced zoning case- for our review and ,find that we could ,adequately 1 ocate this property on ~ the zoning map should i t be passed by both the Planning & Zoni ng Commission and the City Counci 1. .; ,,;,~., ~.~ F.~~ ~.- - R CHARD W. ALBI N, P.E. RWA/1 j c cc: h1r. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ~~r. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works - 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267-3367 ~~ „,...,.... .... .............«.,.......,,..,. ~.w+++.r.a.' .++~BiM..... -..r«:~a-+er+..:•.•... ~....... _.. ,._._........ ~1,3r.w:.r~ot.,. .r ..luRrs.~r~"iti~S~ii..Ltcv~',.~, ~ r f ~ . G - ORDINANCE N0. ~o ~~ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE .. ~ WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE X119, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY~COUNCIL OF ~~ THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 19b1, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1915 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION.. IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-29 the following described property shall be rezoned from 1F-9-One Family Dwellings to IF-8-1500-One Family Dwellings. Commencing at .the northwest corner of Lot 1 in Block 10 of Foster Village, as said Lot appears upon the map recorded in volume 388-8I, ~,.. page 43 of the said Deed Records; and then run, north 89 degrees 42: minutes 25 seconds west 10 feet and north no degrees I7 minutes 35 seconds east 300 feet to the southwest and beginning corner of the tract being described; L .~ THENCE North no degrees 17 minutes 35 seconds east, along the east _ line of right of way of Ruf a Snow Drive, 1200.: f eet ; THENCE North $9 degrees 46 minutes 19 seconds east, to and along the south line of North Richland Estates, Phase I, a distance of 2184-6/10 feet to the northwest corner of Block l of Maroaks Addition; THENCE South no degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds east, along the west line of said Maroaks Addition, 924 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds west, 130 feet; THENCE i~lorth no degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds west, 23-41/100 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds west, 213-89/100 feet; THENCE South 84 degrees 57 minutes 15 seconds west, 211-08/100 feet; THENCE South 79 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds west 1511-59/100 feet; THENCE North 89 degrees 42 minutes 25 seconds west 160-59/I00 feet to ~. the place of beginning and containing SI-98/100 acres. ,,..._: .. _ ,...,..:1.:.. .. ~.: ,.....~3 s.......,: >: , • . J • ' Page 2 , :} .., This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive and approximately 425 feet north of Starnes Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 28th DAY OF APRIL, 1983. CHAIRI!~AN PLANNING AND~ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE K0. PZ-83-29 IS HEREBY REZONED ~` THIS DAY OF~ E L .~ ~" ~• ~:: • ~ ~, DICK FAR.AM, MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAI~~D HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 0 ! - ~~ DATE: June 8, .1983 . - ., - SUBJECT: ~_ ~ ~ , . ,. ~EPA~t.TMENT : ~ . BACKGROUND: and Eldorado Drive. ~ ~ ~ '~ There were 12 property owners contacted and legal petition has been filed. ~ ~ ~~ The Planning and Zoning Commission recomn~end~d approval of ~ this zoning change with the recommendation to the City Council to ~ tie the ~zonin to the 9 site plan as submitted to the P2 Commission. The motion was approved ~-2, ' This request was recessed at the May 23,1983 Council Meetin . g ,~ ...:. .. . C`~~ COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: A rove Disa rove Zonin Re est. ~a~~DGETED ITEM: YFS N~___. NO N A ,,~ ~, ,~ ` . , ~~. , ~ t age 22 .~ P & Z Minutes .. £' `` ,c et, ;~~ ~ `R t April 28, 1983 y .,t y .~ 14. PZ 83-30 :~. . ~ ::;. . ~., ,y~ ~~ t ~-" tip' -,'~ . Y ~ .. t. a r ., r ' ! ' ., 4 • Request of Gaylord Van Y to rezone a portion of Block H, Richland ~aks~ Addition, from it_s present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Commercial. This property is located at the, southeast corner of Grapevine Highway and Eldorado Drive. . Chairman Tucker .opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Van Y came forward. He said the is ,requesting this zoning change to allow him to build a shopping center 225 feet long and SO feet deep with a warehouse in the back 200 foot long and 80 feet deep to house a Baird's Bakery Disbursement Center and retail shopping center. _ , Mr. Hannon asked what he meant by a disbursement center. ' Mr. Van Y said this would be where their products will be brought from where they were manufactured and will be transferred to the trucks which will take them to the retail units in the area. Mr. Hannon asked how large this would be in regard to square footage. Mr. Van Y said it would be approximately 16,000 square feet.. The Chairman called for. those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please ~ come forward. Jan Sheppard, 8113 Jerri Jo, came forward. She said her property joins this property to the south, and she is opposed to this zoning request. Ms. Sheppard said she has a note from Mr. & Mrs. J, Thompson which states they are also in opposition to this request until further information is given. ~,,,~ ~~ r; ^ . r~ ~~ Ms. Sheppard said they received a letter yesterday from Mr. Van Y . stating what he is proposing there, and it was the first time there was any mention of a shopping center. She read quotes from his letter which stated the part of the complex adjacent to the single family would have a concrete wall Ib feet high and 200 feet long with no doors or windows and an 8 f oot wood fence would extend. from the concrete wall along the property line from the northeast to the southwest forming a sound barrier for the property owners convenience, It_also stated trees would be planted at intervals along the concrete wall and wood fence to enhance the shopping center's rear boundary. Ms. Sheppard said she works in Dallas and all she sees all day are concrete and glass buildings, 'and with this, she would go home and all she could . see would be a lb foot high concrete wall. ~ - `~ Ms. Sheppard said there are lots of shopping areas in the mid cities area and she was concerned with how many shops would be in there and how many would stand vacant, She said this would allow more transients in the area and her home has already been broken into twice. Ms. Sheppard said they have problems with garbage coming from the Take-it store across the street and there would be much more with the Baird's Distribution Center there. Ms. Sheppard said she has only lived there 2~ years, but several of her neighbors have worked hard to get "No Trucks Allowed" signs put up at both ends of Eldorado. She said they had got them put on Nevada and Strummer also. • Ms. Sheppard said the back of a building is always the first to go to pot, and she does not want a 16 foot concrete fence nor the added traffic .~,:,~,:.this this would create. ~. jl ~ ~ 4 ~ ~~ i. Chairman ducker stated this property is zoned Local Retail now which would allow a shopping center. Ms.~Sheppard said she was aware of this, but she is opposed to the trucking center. Thomas W, Ellis, 8105 Jerri Jo, came forward. He said he agrees with what Ms. Sheppard has said 100 percent.~~ Ms. Lee Strock came forward. She said she is a neighbor and her property backs up to'this property. She said she is~opposed to this and she also represents Mr. Snibes who is an elderly paraplegic. She said their house was built especially for a paraplegic. Ms. Strock said they did not look forward to going out in their back yard and seeing a 16 foot wall because the back yard is Mr, Snibes only joy: k . Ms. Strock said the love their - property`and the others have covered most everything. She said they `are not oppo"sed to development, but they do not feel they should be subjected to a warehouse, the traffic, and the noise. Mr. Wood asked her if she would be opposed to the shopping center. Ms. Strock said even though they would not be happy with it, they could live with it . Mr. Van Y asked to speak again. He said he would like to explain this warehouse situation. He said if you have a strip center with a 12 foot wall as opposed to the warehouse with the 16 foot way, there is just not that much difference. Mr. Van Y showed the Commission and homeowners a prospective site plan for the area. He said his reason for putting the 200 foot long concrete wall plus the wood fence with the trees was to try to create a noise barrier. f .' f~ ' ~• 4 Page 25 ~ ~ ~ ~:W. ~ P ~ Z Minutes ~ '- '`;~~ April 28, 1983 .; , .w _ :Rr ~~- _ .. 'l .~ ~• . , , •...~ .: ~a ,; . ~~ ~/ Mr. Van Y~ said he would like for Mr. Baird to explain the functions of the warehouse. Mr.~Wood asked if all the trucks would access onto Grapevine Highway or would any of them go on the side street. Mr. Van Y said probably the delivery semi trucks would come in off Eldorado and back in, but the trucks that leave there will go directly to the highway. Mr. Hannan asked to see a plot plan of this property. He asked if all the loading and unloading would take place inside the building. Mr. Van Y said it would. Mr. Hannon said he was concerned there might be several semi trucks setting at one time with their diesel running t Miram Ba~:rd came forward. He said they would have 15 route trucks"which would come into the entrance of~the building ,and be completely enclosed. He said all loading and unloading will be done on the .inside and they do not plan more than 20 vehicles in the future. Mr. Baird said there would be two transport trucks that would come in late in the evening and would leave out about b:00 in the morning. Mr. Baird said it would take about 40 minutes to unload them. Mr. Hannon asked if they. would have enough off-street parking. Mr.~Baird said they would, Mr. Hannon said his main concern would be if they had to let a diesel set. there and idle for an hour or so. Mr. Baird said they would not do that. He said they have distribution centers in all major cities such as Dallas and Houston and they have one in k'atauga. ~.~~~ ., . ' ~ Page 2 b ~' ~ •P & Z Minutes ~, .. ' ~ April 28,_ 1983 .., R ~. ;~ ~ . PZ 83-30 APPROVED .. Mr: Hannon said he was concerned that if this proposed project fell through, would the zoning be correct for something else; there-are so many things that can go in commercial zoning. He said he wonders if this is the appropriate use for this property. Mr. Wood asked if they would agree to tie the site plan to the zoning. Mr, Hannon said the Planning and Zoning Commission could not do that, only the City, Council could. Mr. Bowen asked if the trucks would be parked there when not in use. Mr. Baird said only inside the building. Ms. Sheppard said she is still opposed to this request. She asked what were - they going to do, there are 'no trucks allowed on Eldorado. She said she is . , more opposed to this request than ever. Chairman:.Tucker said he is concerned about an 18 wheeler backing up on Eldorado. Mr. van Y asked if the 18 wheelers coming on Eldorado was the problem. He said they could make they go through the center of the building and then they would not have to come on Eldorado. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Tucker said if this Commission approves this, it would be putting a warehouse next to residential. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 83-30 with the recommendation to the City Council to tie the zoning to the site plan as submitted here tonight. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 3-2 with Tucker and Bowen voting against. 1 ~' -~ ~ ~ w ~ . J .. .. . _ . .-L T0: City Council - - ~ DATE: ,City of North Richland Hills ... CASE N0. TIME: .: ~ We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE: DATE: ADDRESS: . ~ 4;vr ~` <_ ~ a~ ~~~ ~.~ a ~~~~ 7 r ... • ~.~+'~ ..i.~ ~~ ,~+=~-Zti~. . ~, ~ . .. . ',x', ,~ _. ._ .b . i , .'" `. .. ty ~_ ' } ~.~ . - ~- T0: City. Council _ DATE: City of North Richland Hills TIME; ., .. CASE N0. ,. ., ..,~. ~~~ We, the undersigned residents andfor property owners in North Richland Hi not within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezonin . ~ the said tract for the following reasons This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE: DATE: ADD ~ 7 ',~~~' ~ • ~ ~- ~ ~ I/ - , ~~ ~J ~ ~ ~, ~- -~, .. ~ l - -~ ~ ~-~ ~~~ .! ~ .~ ~` ~~i i i ~- ~ • . ~, C P ~!~ ~ / ~r~ v ^~ ,2 )L ~ ~Ll ~ ~~....~-c, LL.f.-cf-c~--c.L s-~~-~3 ~~~~ ' s-/6 -~3 s oi3 f~-~ S /G-~'3 X0/3 c /i.~a'3 .~ ~bR s-i~_k3 ~a~~ ~ .s-i -x-3 .somas .~ -~~ ~3 ~~asd s-ic-89 Sato ' Q• .5-16-~ ~D/ x=16 `dam -,r' oi'~ ~i - /E ~ ~ S~ l 3 ~~ .:~. 0 ~ , ~_` c ~ ~~ 1 `i / f ~ ~ ~ ~ a -~ 1 ,, •- ~:;i ~. 1 • i • ~ • .~~ 1 eYy ~•, ~, ~~+ ~~? ~ ~ ~ . . ;~ '-.~,~ +, 4 ~''~ 1 ~• 1 -. T0: City Council - ~ ~ - - DATE: ~. City of North Richland Hills Tom; f CASE N0. ~~ ~ ! .. .} ~~ ~ We, the undersigned residents and/or property owners in North Richland Hills .~ not within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezonin of g ^ the said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, ~^ . convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATUR • ~ ~~ ~~ %; . _~~~~ ~ , J DATE: ADDRESS: r7 _ ~ 3 3-1~-83 Sool ~ r ~ .~ s /~ ~,, ~. ~ 1~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ y ,~ - _ ~ '~~~ ~ 6 ~ ~a~ ! ~ ~~~ ~. r~r. ,~. j ~ • ` ~Y i, I ~ v ~ ~ j ~ . ~~ f r' r . ~ ~c~~ ~~ / f - C ~ - 3 s~ ~ ~}~ r- ' ~ •• J~ . r y~~ t .~t _ f i i / ~t./ i -/-~~ f ~ ~ ~-------t S- i'1 - 83 J, /~. ~~ r ~'~~ , ~, `~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ,r /, G Vr I V~ ~ .' 1 ~ w L ~, ~' "~ .~ . ~ ~~ ~ I D ' f ~~i `r`- ~'/3 ~~~ ~'d'D,Y ' ~ 4~~< `l~k~~ C. ~C~~.~C SOa.I STQ~mm 8`3 o't o ,6~c.~~. ~ 3 z c7 .~..~e. v~' t~ .____ 1 ~ ~~~ ~- /~ ~ ~ ~.r~_ S ~- ~ ii~ T0: City~Council _ DATE: . City of North Richland Hills Tom; -' CASE N0. We, the undersigned residents andjor property owners in North Richland Hills not within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezonin of the said tract for the followin reasons: g g This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, .~ convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE: DATE: ADDRESS: ~F ~;/za . i ~ ,'f S- !ems S~ ~/ iL'F'.s~i~.v -f~c i i~~'t~ ~' 1 a _ - e o L, ~ b'_ /7-r'3 .'i oa LPL v etc • U~'C~~zX~n, ~OOD ~~/ ~ - - - J ~, /.5~-4.c.~_ __//~Cn L~/~ 2sr. ~~ . 4~ctv1 . _ ~~! ~ i _ ~a //7/ r /. ~t ~ 3 L S- 17-P3 12-- l3~iYJ-L~/J s-/ 7- ~.3 o ~ S / ~ ~' --~35 o ~/~3 . ~Pa 9 ~.~ -~^-- . r# 5~ ~- / ~ S~oS f _ ~~~=or~9 o ~~r~d9 ~.P/ _ ~ 9~ -o ~/:, S7 - ' T0: City Council City of North Richland Hills DATE :_ TIME; CASE N0. ..; . .., Y 1 ~ / n We, the undersigned residents and/or property owners in North Richland Hills not within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezonin of the said tract for the followin reasons: ~ g 8 This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, .~ _ convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE• DATE: ADDRESS: ~S R. ~nl (-{~ ~. ~. _ ~/~/t a ~ O ~ pfd dK K ~ tt. ,~ ,~ ~~~~oo~ s-~Q-B~ - ~~oy~~ ~.. ~- ~~ / ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ , / f ~l ' ~ • ~ / - , ~.;. ,fir ... ~ ~ - . .r ,. .• ^- , ,~ I f 1~ ..~ a t I <~ ~ ~`. `. . KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas Apri 1 15, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hi 11 s . 1301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 16118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83=30, LR TO COM., GRID 124 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find the we .could adequately 1 oca to this property on the zoning map should i t be passed by both`the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Counci S , , i t .` ., t' t , RICHARD W. ALBI N, P. E, RWA/1 jc cc: t~~r. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG, • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267.336 >~ scQ,cE~iM: ~Op ~ pZ ~3 -~ ~~ ~. . :~ r T t1 1 Y .•, ._ . j; ~. C J' .'T• r+~T+ j ~fi' 1 1~~ F'. ..grits .. ' T ~..,., ~r ~ ort .~ ,gin o f ~ 1~C~ C'i 1 ' ~~ ~~,,, ~ , . ~.., . , ~- 1 ~ '~ ~ G. t- ., ,, Y .. ,~, J -11i., p ^e i ~~ D~ ,r; r~,core; ~; o~ Tu - rh~ ~ t C ~~~ ~ 1 ~`c~~ ~.r ~~rt ~;~: 1 _ , . c ~.scr~ ~ ;:~ ..s follo:'•,;. , ._~. ~ , ~:.~~~t ,..~~~.~- fart :e .; ~~ ? I. ~, ~ 1 -. ~~'1I1. ..,. .. ; t ~~ e , ~, r ~. , ~ , Nor tl,~ :~st ~,r 1,.. v,,, of s,~ ~-ci ,..1or,i: Ii ~ 1, t: e ~ l...., , ,. , .. ~ c r . . ~~ ; ; ?.C G ~.,~ , ~:~ ~ ctt; 3 ry 1 ~, ~ .~, , , --:~~ ~~ ot~ r~i'~~c~c, i~1•~ c:l-t ,.. ~~>1/erI 1: ~ o •~fr: • ~ ~ t ~ ~ sa~ ~ CG 1 . ,e ~ ~ ;, ~ . ., , .:.~~, ,, J L , ~ .:? Jr:St ~.~; i ~~ t,, ,. , ~ t j 1 .. •,, i •_I,~ ( ;~, ~ I __~r' ~.•'~ ~ ~~~':!~ 11'"iE of ~ 2C1 ~' ~i' '~~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ , ... 1 ~ .~ (~ ~ rf' ~. r ~ . ~,( ~, i ~ , ~ ~ - , ~ ~~ ~o~;t,•c:~.~t~:~1. 11r,~ of ~ ;' t' c , ` ~ • , • _ ,~ ~.~.~;, , -~.. feEt t c , , , . ~~~ ~~t State ~~? -~~i,t•r~t;.. ~ -- ~ ~..~~ scut; ~: st~;,•~ I~ C ~. , ~:G ~ < 1 1 ~ ' . <, ~ , ~ ~Ii~! ~..~ ~ G;'tl,l:~ :St ~ti,1~- ~: l -.. ,. ., E-~ ~e r f .~~1:~ ~ ,... . • .o~~ ~, t~ 1 -1 ~r'• ~J~ V11 ~~ \~1~ ~ ~(~, !t ~~~T.: ~ ~ ~ \„~!.~1{, rr, ~-/O1 it ~ 'r `~' ) , ( /^'~ r .~ ' ~CL.+I: ~ Cb1Jt~dl~ 1 ~ ~_ }.'" l,l I T . r, ~ ~ u I 1 1 ~ . ~l ,/ ~ ' l y ~ ~~ ~ ~. ;~ ~' 1 * f ~"''' '~'~ / 1...~..,... ....~..:.i..i~~ 1 •1~t ..••.. ! . • ... .. 1 ~ • ~ ~'` / + ~ ~~ ~ r 0 3 Z y A n i -hereby certify thot the above sh own plot is o true and correct representation of o surve mode on t Y he ground Surveyed /7 Q~c~ 19 G7 ~. ~~ :.._, ,.. ~.• nn arch 15, 1~R.3. BY ROBERT A. NEFFINGTON ~ • REG. PUBLIC SURVEYOR 205-8 E. 6ELKNAP ST. FORT WORTH, TEXAS -~-.~. •„ ~ ,, ,. ~ ~~ .i. ~. _ ORDINANCE N~,~ ~~ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE X179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY. OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, .. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1915 ~~ AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION. _ IS SUBMITTED TO THE~CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-30 the following described property shall be rezoned from Local Retail to Commercial. BEING a portion of Block H, Richland Oaks Addition, 5th Filing, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County,~Texas, according. to plat recorded in Volume 388-14, Page 83, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described as follows: _ , BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Block H, in the . Southeasterly R.O.W. Line of State Highway No 121, and the Southwesterly R.O:.W.., line of Eldorado Drive; ~ t x "r j ~. ~. THENCE South 37~degrees 51 minutes East with said Southwesterly line- of Eldorado Drive and the Northeasterly line of said Block H, 208.1 feet to the Southeast corner of said Block H; THENCE South 54 degrees 22 minutes West with the•Southeasterly line of said Block H, and the Northwesterly line of a 20 foot alley, 218.4 . ~ feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 77 degrees 37 minutes West with said Southeasterly line of Block H, and said Northwesterly line of a 20 foot alley, 59.4 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 33 degrees 41 minutes West 172.0 feet to an iron rod in said Southeasterly R.O.W. LINE OF State Highway No. 121, and the Northwesterly line of said Block H; THENCE North 52 degrees 09 minutes East with said Southeasterly line of Highway 121, 318.5 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING. 0 !~ .~~:,~ti ,:. , . ._,~ ,: l Page 2 This property is located at the southeast corner of Grapevine Highway and Eldorado Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 28th DAY OF APRIL, 1983, CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND,ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING~AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ' ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE N0. PZ-83-34 IS HEREBY REZONED L THIS DAY OF E ' r, ,~ ~ ~ . ,,. , . . .~. i _ ~,, f DICK FARAM, MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND~HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~~ Page 12 May 23, 1983 Mr. Bill Pasteur appeared before the Council. Mr. Pasteur stated that the trend was toward single family dwellings. Mr. Pasteur stated that the recession had made it more feasible for smaller lots and smaller homes, however they were aware of North Richland Hills' policy. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Pasteur if 1,500 square feet in the area was marketable. Mr. Pasteur stated that at this time it would not be hard to market 1,500 however 9 or 10 months ago it would have been very difficult. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being no one else present to speak in favor or in opposition of this Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 21. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis to approve PZ 83-33. Motion carried b-0. • 34. None 35. Mayor Faram recessed the May 23, 1983 meeting to June 13th, 1983. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-33 ORDINANCE N0. 1030 A T1T\T1 ATTTIT\ CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mayor ATTEST: Ginny Pierce - Acting City Secretary u s' ,: ~ ,. .. . +~ ,' ' ti.'.v , ' w., LY:, f1 • r:• ~i~ •. •'•• •'~ ' ~~tf;, ' •~»~ ~ • ;K'• _. • • ...:•.• nr ...:.: ;. ... 1 star of the2lletroples f~Pr#t~tttt#P II~ ~4Pr~tttP THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS T0: PAM BURNEY - IN RECOGNITION OF FIVE YEAB,S OF FAITHFUL SERVICE _ .~ -~ .: TO THE CITY IN THE ~ POLICE DEPARTMENT. DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS _ ~ ~ h DAY OF JUNE, 1983___ ~. . , • Mayor r .. :;:: . ~.. :::. . ~ , :;. C' y Manager ~ • ~ . ~. ~. ~ • •' epar meat ead yy.:l. 1'.ti~'~ ., . • ~ ~r• • ~ ~'' ' :,: '.i.,.. ;,;c;;,f~.:s..,~ .. ., _, ., •:•~J:. ~i+~~r:-:~~E~j~~: ~'a r ..~:: , •y;i I ' • .~~\~r • • y.: t~ ~ ;y ' ~ ,. .. •~ ,;.,; •t' . /•ti.~y ~J ~ ~ i:;~ V ~~~' {~~ • . ~••,'• ~' 1:1:x•' ~ .•,;• . ~ "~~• .. ;~. ~ ~r ...:: ;. .. 1 . . star of the ~VI etro lex ,,j f~CPr#ifitttt~ II~ ~Px~itP THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO: BOB DUNLOP ..- _ _. IN RECOGNITION OF__ FIVE YEAB,S OF FAITHFUL SERVICE _ ~....... .~- .t ~. ~ Ji ~~ TO THE CITY IN THE _ Po .t .F DEPARTM :~ ENT. DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1983_. , w.i k .. ~~~ .~ v -- Mayor t/'L /l. Ci Manager ~ ~ ~ .. . ~' r, u . r' 1. .I:r •~~....: ; •; . ..,.. ". i:.:: . ~~; • , • 'r .~Z~,;y:~i:~;~.5 ;•J~• ::iJ~~,!1i :•'.i:Jf.r ~.• ::14~7~~r ' .' ri.% <. ~ . ~~~ ~ . ... .... ' ~ ,y~ t • ` , n L •777Y~~•• a•-r,. .. 1 star of the~Ietropleac ~PrftfttMfP II~ p~Pr~?ttP THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO: CHARLIE HOWARD =?~J IN RECOGNITION OF--IVE YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVI ~,,.r... CE _ ~~ `~ r TO THE CITY IN THE~~ +~ FIRE DEPARTME •• NT. DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS 1 th •~~~~'~~~• ~t. DAY OF_ .ft~, i 9 ~ ~ ~ ::.,. Mayor • •.. vp ~• ~ ~' ty Manager ~•••• •: . ... 1.' ••\ Department Head ~•~n. 1{r'i • ,:~ t .~~. y~. ~ t f.:::. ' ,' ~:~:' •~• iZ~•,r /.. .}'~~ ~ .. 'J. t•• • : i ~:' t.. :1 . . / ~'~.Ji'. '~, j~,(~11L' l\•, ~~•h f ~ ~~ . ~ DATE: b-3-83 w SUBJECT: Davis Blvd, Elevated Stora e Tank Pro'ect _.._. - _. DEPARTMENT: Utility. BACKGROUND: The tank at this time is 35 to 40 ercent com lete and is runnin ahead of schedule. If the weather remains fair we should have this tank in service b earl S rin 1984,, i• --~-- - I ~r~.~ -- -- - - ~ r...-+.w~.~r.-.r.. .., ~..+++~..~..~.....rr ~., ...r .. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: A~pproue ~.~.~ $90.10?...~QQ.,.t~Claliye.~. ~ Ta ~~ Trn~;tp,r.~,,, ~.~~ r - -_ - +~....~~ ....... BUDGETED ITEM: YES ~_ NO ~. ACCOUNT NUMBER: Ptevenue Bondi .. ' l ~~, --rrr.~~-~r-~~~.~-----M.~~w ~--r-r~~-~.~~--r-~w~ rr.~ ~.~~.~~~-~w..~~-~w~.r~......rr...w.«rw~.~.~-~~r~r.r~~~.... a. ~. .r ... ~., ... \.1,'. 1\~ ~ . '.. . a ~ ~ _, 4 LION- NGEISH LOUVERS NC. ., ~ =, ~ C0~'~SUITiti~G E!~'GI~'EERS /Fort 1ti'orth-Dallas 'June 1, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Counci 1 City of North Richland Hi 11 s . 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hi 11 s, Texas 76118 Re: 3-540, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND NILLS, DAVIS BLVD, 2, 0 I~. G, ELEVATED STORAGE TANK, COfdTRACTOR' S PARTIAL PAY ESTIt~~ATE N0. 4 Enclosed i s one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 4 dated June 1, 1983, made payable to Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc, in the amoun t of $90,102.00, for materials furnished and work erformed on the referen ro ' e p c ed p ~ ct as of May 31, 1983. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site b re resentative bill Rutted a as in y your P ~ g , d~cated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the 1 tem extens ~ ons and adds t~ ons,, _ We recommend that thi s ~ payment in amount of $90,02.00, be made to Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc. , P.0, Box 3115b, Indianapolis, Indiana 46231. Along wi th a copy of this 1 etter, the Contractor i s bei n furnished a blank estima g to form for preparing next month's estimate. ICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ 1 j c cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager P1r. Ronald J, Scott, Universal Tank & Iron Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public i~orks Per. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mrs. Lou Spiegel Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76~b~2~ •817/283-6217 • METRO/267.3367 r.~ s~ ... DATE: 6-8-83 SUBJECT: Snow Heights Street and Drainage Project DEPARTMENT: rubric.works BACKGROUND: This project has about 1b0 da s left to fullfill the contract, All utility work~is com lete includin Lone Star Gas. I have talked with Austin Road this date and the are su ose to~move in on Holiday Lane 6/9/83 to start curb and avin work. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Ap~ro,_._ye ~avment of 547,~Q5Q~..1$.. to..Austi.n_.Baal._Co:.~.._~__....._..~..._._,. __...._.._.._.. .~._._ .,r_~__.~...._.. BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: it . ~ . ~ /1 __..._ ..-......_.. - - _~._ .__ ... _._.r. rrrr-rrrrr-rrr~/~r~M~M~~rfrr-r~r+ rr-r~rr rrr rr-r~rr raw-r-.r.. w.+. .~....~w.... ~.. .r.r.«r~. .rrrr ~. ~. r.«.r w~... ... .. .. ..«.... ... ' t • '"~ r It ~ K, ti ;•'~ ~ ~ ~„ rLi+~~r: t' ~ ..4..;'~ SH . NOWLTC~N NGLI - ~~~..~ _ L~~VERS NC ~.~ ~~~~ ,..t: # ~ .r ~~~•~ COtiSUITitiG E~+GINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas June 7, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Counci 1 City of North Richland Hi 11 s .7301 hi. E, Loop 820 P~orth Richland Hills, Texas 16118 Re: 3-325, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, . SNOW HEIGHTS STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 4 Enclosed i s one copy of Contractor's Partial Pa Estimate No. 4 da . June 3 y ~ ted 1983, made payable to Austin Road Company ~n the amount of 47 050 • $ .18, for r~ateri al s furnished and work performed on the referenced ro 'ect a A ri 1 30 1983 P J s of P ~ . . The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-si • to by you r representat~ ve, B~ 11 Rutledge, as ~ nd ~cated by s ~ gnature on the estimate and we have checked the item ex.tensi ons and additions. Please note that this estimate includes extra work ordered b f r - y the City I ns pecto r o uti] 1ty adjustments as covered in Item No, 33 and Items 38 throu h items i nc1 uded ~ ' 9 46• These ~n this change order have already been constructed and therefore we would recommend that they be included i n this month `s Contractor's re u for a ent. The amount q est P ym of this change order totals $6,644.00 We recommend that this payment in amount of 47 050 $ .18, be made to Aus t~ n Road Co, at P.Q, box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 16113. Along wi th a copy of this 1 etter, the Contractor i s be in furnished blank estimate form f g a or preparing next month's estimate. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P, E. RWA/ 1 j c cc: i~r. Rodger N. Line, City Manager f~1r. Dwight Smith, Austin Road Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works . Mr. Bi 11 Rutledge, City Inspector Mrs . Lou Spiegel ; Director of Finance Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267.3367 ~.i~~ •_ , 6-8-83 `~~ DATE: SUBJECT:. Onyx Dr. North & Dawn Dr. Street. and Drainage Project DEPARTMENT: ru~lic.worxs BACKGROUND: This job has been completed for several weeks, Ins ection has been made to verify completion. i ~wr~ . ^r^.r~~rrrrr~~^ i rrr~r ^ - - rr r » ,. r - - ~.+-.rw.+.,. .... , r~~~r - - - - ., CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approved final payment of _522, 284, 63 to Austin Roa~Q~,_._~.. BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: ~ G 0 Bonds '! / ` I / . r~ ^~~^ri-~~-M.--r~~-''~~i^r~~rr^~~~-~a.rrY--~ / `w~-w~-~^r-----~~~r~-~~rr~rr•~~i.~.~r.~~.w. ~.~rrw-~r.r ~w~rrr~rr w.~~-..w~.r .. .. .. 11.1. 1`\ ~, . . ` ~: ~, f..~; .r. ...... .~ar. R :~<~~~, i ~'~ :~~ ~ i~ f~, Ju ne 7, 1983 KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Gallas ~ ENS Honorable Mayor and City Counci l City of North Richland Hi 11 s 1301 N. E, Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 16118 Re: 3-319, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAPJD HILLS, ONYX DR. N. & DAl~1N DR, PAVING & DRAI NAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR`S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE N0. 8 ND FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor`s Partial Pay Estimate No, 8, dated June 3, 1983, made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of $22 284.63 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced ro'ect as of Ma 25 1983, P ~ y s The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-si to b our re resentative Flo d McCallum y y P ~ y , as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. In the absence of an ne a- tive re orts b the Cit Staff concern' Y g P y y i ng the condo ton of the s project, we would recommend that .the., above final payment be ~+ade to Austin Road Co, at P .O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. P1 ease note that this estimate incl udes a deducti on of $2,638.00 from total or w k completed, as requested by the Public Works Department and ap roved b Council for road re air wor P y ' p k on Dawn Dave performed by City forces to accommodate local traffic. This project includes storm drain construction in On x Dri • y ve North and Dawn Dave designed to alleviate experienced flooding 1n the area. Also included in this project. was pavement overlay construction on Onyx Drive North and curb and utter and pavin re lacement in Dawn Drive fr g 9 P •om Onyx Dave North to Glenview. Three change orders were issued for this project to cover additional util it ad 'ustmen re uired, y J is q In accordance with Section 3.2.11~a} of the Contract, the two (2 ear term of }y ma ~ ntenance wi 11 begin on th1 s date, and therefore, wi l 1 terminate on June 1 1985. The total completion time for this project as 191 calendar days, for a schedul ed completion date of -March 22, 1983, However, since work was substantial) com lete before this date l i uidated dams es wer y P • q • g e not incurred and therefore should not be assessed on this project, 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 7~~'2~ • 817/283.6211 • METRO/267.3357 Ib ~ ~ Page 2, Honorable Mayor and City Council, June 7, 1983 A1ang with the final Contractor's Estimate tabulation we are enclasin " „ g a Recon- ciliation Change Order for your Information which accounts for differ ences between the original estimated and actual as-built uantities. q RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. • ~ RWA/1 j c cc: ter. Rodger N. Line, City h1anager Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works h1r. F1 oyd h1cCa1 l um, C~ ty Inspector P1r. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works ~1rs. Lou Spiegel , Director of Finance _.. _ ~,.~, f DATE: 6-8-83 t , SUBJECT: Right Turn Lane at~Rufe Snow & 820 DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: The Street Dept, is pro osin to build a ri ht turn lane at the h _. . ,. southeast corner of Rufe Snow and Loo 820 to reduce traffic con e tion this .intersection. We onl have 6' to 8' of ri ht of wa left at _this ~.o.~ ati cn<.._ .__. After we complete the ro' ect we will not have an ri ht of wa 1 ,..~,. is going to close the station on the corner for rebuildin a ' the curbs at this location, The ro'ect will cost us .about 8 5 0 ~ ' . ~ $7,500 is for signal relocation and $1 000 is for road bed mate is ~....~ _, CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve $8,500 expenditure for the above proiect and _ __ appropriate this amount from the General Fund Cont_ in~encY Allowance, ~,_~._~,. _. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: General Fund Reserves .._..~,.., ~/ / / , ~ V ---~rrr~~~~~~~ -~w.~---~ ~--.---.-r ~-~~~~~--~~--~~--~-w...~.r~~r~~---~~.~~.~ry..~..~..~. ~w.~wrr.w ~.~~~..~-.~.rw,~..w .- .~ .. .. I ~ ' ~ ' DATE : 6' ~' 83 `~~ SUBJECT: Ordinance Controlling Water & Sewer Taps -~ DEp~~~; Utility. BACKGRQUND; This ordinance allows us to control water and sewer to s where we have .ir~adequate~lines to serve, Most of these lines are in areas that have not been developed. This also allows us to control the density in the area of non-eonformin use around the concentration of mobile homes. ._....._ ._. _ . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: APProve/disapprove the Ordinance. . ........_.__... __._.._._y..,,..... _...._....r_.. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCQUt~tT NUMBER: YES NO N/A ` r / ~ wr~w-~.~r-~.~ww.~w~.w~r......~.~wr~-wrrw...~-w~.~. ../ I ~'j 1 -w r- -~~~\-~~M~~~-ter ~rwr~~r~rw~rti ~r+F~lw w: /rte\ir~rr~~.~wr-ww~aw ~. ... .wr.`. ... ORDINANCE N0. ~~ 3 / .'i Y/.~, i tt~ l WHEREAS, there afire areas in the City. where water and sewer-lines were installed prior to the time that city standards were established or were installed at a time when the lines were not subject to City Rules and ..Regulations; WHEREAS, many of the water and sewer lines in such areas are inadequate to provide proper water and sewer service to additional water and sewer users. NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of . North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. In areas of the City where existing water 'and sewer lines do not meet existing requirements as to size of lines, the Director of Public works ~~ shall review, each permit or application for water and sewer service and shall make a determination as to whether or not the furnishing of water and sewer to such applicant will adversely affect the service to existing users. In making such determination the said Director of Public Works shall consider the concentration of existing and additional users that would adversely affect water pressure and the ability of the sewer lines to carry additional sewage ,from the area in question. ~ ~ If the Director of Public Works determines that the concentration of use would adversely affect existing water and sewer users then he is hereby authorized to deny the application for such building permit and to deny any request for water or sewer service in such areas where lines do not meet existing standards. 2. Any person who feels adversely affected by the decision of the Director of Public Works shall have the right to appeal his decision to the City Council within fifteen (IS} days from such decision. The City Council, after hearing, shall have the power to affirm, reserve or modify the decision of the Director. If the appellant feels adversely affected by the final decision of the City Council he shall have the right to appeal such decision to a District Court within fifteen (15} days of such decision. 3. If any portion of this ordinance is held to be invalid it shall not affect the remaining valid portions of the ordinance . 4. This ordinance applies to all areas served outside the city limits as well as within the .city limits. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval. Passed and approved this 13th day of June, 1983. ~ ~ Mayor i• ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney ~.. - ~. ~` i DATE: 67-83 ~~,,-~ E SUB3ECT: Ordinance for the Abatement of Dan Brous Buildin - -- ,..~ DEPARTMENT ; Pub li.c Works BACKGROUND: This ordinance has plenty of saf e~uards_ _in _it_ to avoid tP_~r~ a buildin down that we shouldn't. This ordinan of a Board of A eals for this code and t e k~e need Ma or Faram t o a o in t ~.as._.s.aan__a '~b,1.~,...~ ~~ _ See attachment showin ste s to be followed for abate _____ CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the ordinance and Mayor Faram appoint five members and .two alternates. ~._.._._._ _. ....._._.._.. _.w __ ~ .~ .~ BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: ,~~. ------N A ~ , _ .._ ...._. f ~~ /, '~ ~` r~ / I 1 r 1 I~ 1 I ! ~ i ^ r 1 1 w . ~'~~ . ` ~~~~ ~ J Steps to b e taken concerning the repair or demolition of a dangerous building. 1.~ Building Official determines by inspection that the building is dangerous and steps need to be taken to abate the danger, 2. Notice is sent to the owner of the Building Official's findings. a. If notice is to repair the structure, the owner must make application for repairs within 60 days of the notice. b. If the Building Official determines that the dangerous structure is so dangerous that it should not be occupied then he also notifies the occupant to vacate. The Building Official in his notice sets the date that the occupant must vacate the structure, c. If the Building Official determines that the structure is beyond repair then a notice is sent out to the owner to . demolish the structure and clear the land of all debris. The owner then must make application to demolish the structure within 60 days of the notice. 3. The service to the owner by the Building Official must be made in the following manner. a. The notice is given to the owner in person. b. The notice is sent by certified mail with return receipt r u ted. `~ - D 4. The owner may within 30 days appeal the Building Official's decision to the Board of Appeals. a. The Board. of Appeals shall hear the case within 10 to b0 days ~of the filing of the appeal. b. The Board holds the°~hearing and may appoint other people to investigate. They may subpoena any witnesses or anyone to testify on the matter. . c. After the hearing the Board makes their decision and renders the same to the owner. This .decision can be to repair, to demolish, to vacate, or repair and occupy the premises. 5. If the owner disagrees with the decision of the Board of Appeals, then they may appeal their decision to the District Courts. 6. If the owner does not respond or appeal the decision of the Building Official then the following must occur. a. The Building Official files a certificate at the County Records stating the location and the condition of the structure and that the owner was notified, and the manner in which he was notified. b. The Building Official causes the dangerous structure to be abated either by repair or demolition. c. After this has been accomplished a new certification is sent for County Records stating that the dangerous structure has been abated and no longer exists. 7. The next and last procedure is to file liens against the property for the expense the City was out in repairing or demolishing the • dangerous structure. • ORDINANCE N0. ~ 3 C BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills. Texas, that: 1. The "Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dan Brous Buildin g gs be and is hereby adopted and shall be in full force and effect in the Cit of North Richland Hills, Texas. A co of said Cod y PY e is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A". .. 2. The "Board of Appeals" called for in said Uniform Abatement of Dangerous Buildings Code and Building Codes" will be comprised of five members and two alternates to be appointed by the Mayor and confirmed b the City Council . y s vim. ~ ers ,..mod to .. This board shall serve until April, 1985 and until successors have been duly appointed and qualified. Passed and approved this 13th day of June, 1983. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AI~~D LEGALITY: City Attorney . . ORDINANCE N0. 1035 BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings" be and is hereby adopted and shall be in full force and effect in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. A copy of said Code is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A". 2. The "Board of Appeals" called for in said Uniform Abatement of Dangerous Buildings Code and Building Codes" will be comprised of five members and two alternates to be appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. This Board shall serve two-year-terms until April 1985 and until successors have been duly appointed and qualified. 3. Any party aggrieved by a decision or order of the "Board of Appeals" shall have five days to file a motion for rehearing setting out specific grounds therefor. A motion for rehearing must be filed as a prerequisite to appeal. The Board shall give notice to all parties and act upon such motion for rehearing at the earliest practical date, in no event longer than 10 days from filing . A party aggrieved by the action of the Board on the motion for rehearing may appeal to any District Court of Tarrant County, Texas by filing suit within 30 days from the date the Board takes final action on the motion for rehearing. The case before the District Court shall be tried under the "Substantial Evidence Rule" and not under the "Trial de Novo Rule." PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of June 1983. Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney • i • 1982 EDITION 401 Chapter 4 NOTICES AND ORDERS OF BUILDING OFFICIAL i• General Sec. 401. (a) Commencement of Proceedings. Whenever the building offi- cial has inspected or caused to be inspected any building and has found and determined that such building is a dangerous building, he shall commence proceedings to cause the repair, vacation or demolition of the building, (b} Notice and Order. The building official shall issue a notice and order directed to the record owner of the building. The notice and order shall contain: 1. The street address and a legal description sufficient for identification of the premises upon which the building is located, 2. A statement that the building official has found the building to be dangerous with a brief and concise description of the conditions found to render the building dangerous under the provisions of Section 302 of this code. 3, A statement of the action required to be taken as determined by the building official. (i) If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be repaired, the order shall require that all required permits be secured therefor and the work ,physically commenced within such time (not to exceed b0 days from the date of the order) and completed within such time as the building official shall determine is reasonable under all of the circumstances. (ii) If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be vacated, the order shall require that the building or structure shall be vacated within a time certain from the date of the order as determined by the building official to be reasonable. (iii) If the building official has determined that the building or structure must be demolished, the order shall require that the building be vacated within such time as the building official shall determine is reasonable (not to exceed 60 days from the date of the order); that all required permits be secured therefor within 60 days from the date of the order, and that the demolition be completed within such time as the building official shall determine is reasonable, 4. Statements advising that if any required repair or demolition work (without vacation also being required) is not commenced within the time specified, the building official (i) will order the building vacated and posted to prevent further occupancy until the work is completed, and (ii) may proceed to cause the work to be done and charge the costs thereof against the property or its owner. S. Statements advising (i) that any person having any record title or legal interest in the building ma}~ appeal from the notice and order or any action of the building official to the Board of Appeals, provided the appeal is made in writing as prodded in this code and filed with the building official within 30 days from the date of sen~ice of such notice and order; and (ii} that failure to appeal will f5 4,1 .^ , ` 401-403 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS constitute a waiver of all right to an administrative hearing and determination of the matter. (c) Service of Notice and Order. The notice and order, and any amended or supplemental notice and order, shall be served upon the record owner and posted .on the property; and one copy thereof shall be served on each of the following if known to the building official or disclosed from official public records: the holder ~ of any mortgage or deed of trust or other lien or encumbrance of record; the owner or holder of any lease of record; and the holder of any other estate or legal interest of record in or to the building or the land on which it is located. The failure of the building official to serve any person required herein to be .served shall not invalidate any proceedings hereunder as to any other person duly served or relieve any such person from any duty or obligation imposed on him by the provisions of this section. (d) Method of Service. Service of the notice and order shall be made upon all persons entitled thereto either personally or by mailing a copy of such notice and order by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to each such person at his address as it appears on the last equalized assessment roll of the county or as known to the building official. I_ f no address_ o_ f awn + such person so appears or is known to the buildin o ial then a co of then lice an~"or'der s~ a~"ll~e so ma~ ae ddressed~t~,,~ dress of the buildin i~ vermin the rod . ~. ~~~,~~,of an suchF~c,~ on to receive su otice s not a the valid't i y ofa n ction Service by curt „~ie„ mat ~ die manner herein provided shall be effective on the off' mailing. Goof of Service. Proof of service of the notice and order shall be certified ` - to at the time of service by a written declaration under penalty of perjury executed by the persons effecting service, declaring the time, date, and manner in which service was made. The declaration, together with any receipt card returned in acknowledgment of receipt by certified mail shall be affixed to the copy of the notice and order retained by the building official. Recordation of Notice and Order Sec. 442. If compliance is not had with the order within the time specified therein, and no appeal has been properly and timely filed, the building official shall file in the office of the county recorder a certificate describing the property and certifying (i) that the building is a dangerous building and (ii) that the owner has been so notified. Whenever the corrections ordered shall thereafter have been completed or the building demolished so that it no longer exists as a dangerous building on the property described in the certificate, the building official shall file a new certificate with the county recorder certifying that the building has been demolished or all required corrections have been made so that the building is no longer dangerous, whichever is appropriate. Repair, Vacation and Demolition Sec. 403. (a) Standards to be Followed. The following standards shall be 1s I• _,.. ..w...,.~r ..... .. ..~......_ ~_. ...~«....... ... _ _ _...._. ..._.._._......... ._... ~....~..~ _._. .. .._ ..... ._...._....~ _~ .~.. ... __ .. . i 1982 EDITION 403-404 3 followed by the building official (and by the Board of Appeals if an appeal is taken} in ordering the repair, vacation or demolition of any dangerous building or . ~ structure: 1. Any building declared a dangerous building under this ordinance either shall be repaired in accordance with the current building code or shall be demolished at ` the option of the building owner 2. If the building or structure is in such condition as to make 't ' d' t 1 .~ i• ~ imme ~a e y dangerous to the life, limb, property or safety of the public or its occupants, it shall be ordered to be vacated. Notice to Vacate . Sec, 4i}4. (a} Posting. Every notice to vacate shall, in addition to being served as provided in Section 401 (c}, be posted at or upon each exit of the building and shall be in substantially the following form: DO NOT ENTER . UNSAFE TO OCCUPY It is a misdemeanor to occupy this building, or to remove or deface this notice. . -, ~ Building Official ............of ............. (b) Comp[~$nce. Whenever such notice is posted, the building official shall include a notification thereof in the notice and order issued by him under Subsection (b) of Section 401, reciting the emergency and specifying the condi- tions which necessitate the posting. No person shall remain in or enter any building which has been so posted, except that entry may be made to repair, demolish or remove such building under permit. No person shall remove or deface any such notice after it is posted until the required repairs, demolition or removal have been completed and a Certificate of Occupancy issued pursuant to the provisions of the Building Code. Any person violating this subsection shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 11 4• ti\'~ ~ • ~ . . \.+~ ~:~ ' , . DATE: June 13, 1983 ~^~ r~ ` 8 4./~ j 4'^'"~ ~~TEJECT: Ordinance changing the names of streets ~EpA.~~TMENT; Administration I3~~Ct;GROJND: The developer of Maroaks sub-division has requested to change the name of some of the streets in this sub-division. See attached ordinance) _ ._ r __ --_ ... ... __ C%~: i' ~'~~~'~t,:IL '.~~'ri0t~ kEQUli~:r L~: A~rove disapprove ordinance <<:;.;;;~'T~:~i~ ITF.~~i: t~ES N A N~~~~ .~ ~:• +~C• .. :. . ~ 1 r ORDINANCE N0. f r~ Y AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAMES OF CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, COUNTY OF TARRANT, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the names of the following listed streets located in Maroaks Sub-division are now and hereby changed to the following listed names; EXISTING NAME NEW NAME Lucian Drive Lincoln Drive Summer Drive Hanover Lane Shelly Drive Overton Park Marvin Drive Cimarron Drive SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be comulative of all other ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills providing for the re-naming of streets, and this ordinance shall not operate to repeal .or affect any of such other ordinances except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with provisions, if any, in such other ordinances or ordinances are hereby repealed. ~. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance ,is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance, and all~of the remainder of this ordinance not so held to be unconstitutional shall continue to be in full force and effect . SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication as required by law. _ ~ Passed and adopted this 13th day of June, 1983. . Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _ City Attorney .,,.,,.:. ,.. [ F f f ., i• BURiC COLL/A/S /AIVESTMEA/TS 5228 RUFE SNOW FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 (817) 498-5489 INVESTMENTS SHOPPING CENTERS HOMES WAREHOUSES OIL & GAS ray l9, 1983 Mr. Roger Line City of North ~Zichland Hills ?301 NE Loop 820 North Fschland Hills, texas 74118 Dear Mr. Line: I would like to change the street names on our Maroaks subdivision as follows :. OLD NAME I~IE~v1 1~NIE windhaven Road ~~lindhaven Road Lucian Drive Lincoln Drive Sumner Drive Hanover Lane Shelly Drive OvertAn Park Marvin Drive Ciir~arrQn Drive I believe wee have to submit this to the Council for approval. If so, please put this on your next agenda. ~ you. Yours very truly, ~ ~ Burk Collins Bc/ecl DATE: June 13, 1983 .~ w . .,~ 4 .'' I ' ~ , ~1?RJECT: General Liability and Property Insurance EPA.~~RTMENT: Civil .Service BACr:GR4UND: Bids for subject insurance will be received June 13, 1983. A .. ~~ cover sheet will be distributed at the Council Meeting giving background information and a recommendation. .. _._. .!- • t . - ~. 't , .~ : . ~_ ... r~.n.~.r.r.~~r 1 ~ ~ ~ . :~~t~i.;.1Ll~r~ T~rF~~: ,DES ~?~~ rr~~~~r ~~/~r~~r~~~~r~~r~..r~~r~~.~~~rrr ~rlr ~~~r~~r~~~~~.~~~~r1..r~1~~~~~..~~~rr.~~w~r~~~~~r~r-r r~rr ~~~~~~r~rr i• • .. ~• ~~ b'. .. ~. i DATE; June 13, 1983 SUBJECT: Recommendation to Award General Liabilit and Pro ert Insurance DEPARTMENT; Non-De artmental BACKGROUND: In March 1982 North American Insurance Company was awarded our General ,. Liability and Property insurance for a three- ear period at a fixed annual rate. The agreed to~renew our covera es in 1983 and 1984 at that rate. However the would not renew the second ear at the a reed u on rate unless the General~Liabilit deductible was raised from zero to $5 000. Since commercial insurers can cancel olici s a time durin the polic eriod b ivin the olic ,holder a ten-da written. notice we had no levera e to force North ,American to honor our on final a reement. onse u these covera es were re-submitted for bid. . . '/"T~' After advertisin in the Star Tele ram we~received the attached ids CITY Cat1NCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Consideration to approve recommendation on followin page. ~ . BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: 01-99-O1-4500 1i f ~ ~ i• 1. Alexander & Alexander (A) Home Insurance Co. '(B) Wassau Insurance Co. 2. Arthur Gallagher Northwest Insurance Annual Deductible Premium Gen. Liab: $250 *Combined Property: $250 TMP Gen. Liab: $500 *Combined Property: $250 TMP Gen. Liab: $500 $12,220 Property: $100 $ 7,106 3. Wm. Rigg Co. (A} Gulf Insurance Co. (B} Gulf Insurance Co. is Gen. Liab: $250 *Combined Property: $100 TMP Gen. Liab: $500 *Combined Property: $100 TMP Total $15,642 $46,926 (3 Yr.} $18,x23 $54, 069 (3 Yr. } $19,326 $~6 ~ 074 $78,222 (3 Yr.) $25,731 $77,193 (3 Yr. ) 4. TML (A) Employers Casualty Gen. Liab: -0- $45,892 $49,813 Property: $1,000 - ~ 3,921 {B) Employers Casualty Gen. Liab: 500 $40,754 $44,675 Property: 1,000 $.3,921 (C) Employers Casualty Gen. Liab: 1,000 $39,672 $43,593 Property: 1,000 3,921 RECOMMENDATION: To award our General Liability and Property Insuran ce to Home Insurance Co. as presented by Alexander and Alexand er in the amount of $46,926 for the three-year period June 23, 1983 - June 23, 1986. Payments to be made at 40% the first year and two annual installments with no interest added. *Texas Multi-Peril: The combining of General Liabilit y and Property insurance under one policy. r t-~{~, ,~. ~.~'" DATE: June 13,__ 1983 c;?RJECT :~EPA~~tTMEi~'r: dministration 13AC'r;GROUND: a d ' s a letter transnutt'n are est b Texas Electric Service .. om an for a rat in rease avera in 16.1 and a timetable re ared b TESCO showin critical dates in the consideration of this re uest.~ It is recommended that the letter be referred to the Cit Attorne for re araton of an ordinance s s end'n the ra s re ested endin stud -~ _z .~ - :, ~ _ t~~: z~ ~~.~~'j~CT~: ~~~'fi0't~ RE~U~P.rf: Instruct the City Attorney ~to prepare an ordinance for consideration at the July 11, 1983 Council Meeting. -,,. ~,~ETE~~ ITF.~. TIES NCJ ~„~ ~~ ~ ~, .V•+1ti~:. ... ' ..?r'~1i~. .•• ~. r .~~ ~,,,~ `~' r, TEXAS ~.~~ COMPANY June 9, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council North Richland Hi 11 s ,Texas Texas Electric is filing a request today for a $195 pillion systemwide increase in revenues. This represents an overall increase of 16.1 percent. We have worked hard through the years to give our customers reliable service at the lowest reasonable cost. For example, in the late 1960s, we could see that natural gas was going to become more expensive. So we began a construction program to build plants that would use cheaper fuels. Our customers have benefitted from this construction program. In 1982, our lignite cost 86 cents per million Btu, compared to $3.65 per million Btu for natural gas. And when our nuclear plant is completed, it will use uranium that costs about 70' cents per million Btu for fuel. This construction program has kept customers electric bilks lower than they would .have been otherwise,-and we want to see~~ that the benefits~of this program continue into the future. As we're coming close to completion of the Comanche Peak nuclear plant, our construction program has taken on an additional purpose--to provide for the needs of our grow_in~ service area, Our 48-county service area is growing rapidly. In the, last four years, we've added more than 90,000 new customers to our system. In 1982 alone, TESCO gained more than 20,000 new customers. We're in a good position to handle this growth, primarily because we began our construction program early. While our construction program has saved our customers money and helped guarantee reliable service in the future, it hasn't come without cost. Since our last rate increase in 19808 we have had to borrow $461 million to finance construction. Because this money was borrowed after our last rate increase, we are not allowed to include any of the $55 million in annual interest costs on this money in our customers' bills. These interest costs, like all operating expenses, eventually have to be part of electric bills. If we can't recover these costs as we pay them by including them in bills, we have to borrow even more money. And this additional borrowed money also carries interest charges that eventually will be paid by customers. ~~ ~' .~ -2- ,Inflation during the three years since our last rate request also has had a dramatic impact on TESCO. The cost of construction, the cost of borrowing money and the cost of operations all have increased substantially since 1980. But the base rates that provide the revenue to cover these costs have remained the same. We realize a rate increase places a financial burden on our customers, and we delayed asking for an increase in rates as long as possible. But because of inflation during the last three years, and because of interest costs that must be paid on money borrowed for our construction program, we can no longer . postpone a request for higher rates. For these reasons,, we ask your careful consideration of our request. ' Sincerely, .. R. L. Fai n Suburban Manager -- RL F/ j d ~ , _ ~ ~,:~ • Timetable For Cities For TESCO 1983 Rate Case . 0 --~- Filing date June 9 . . 35 days d P 35 Jul 14 ropose ~ y effective date • 11 ~d ays ~. 46 No July 25: • complaint • ~ filed . . 21 . days • N ~ ~ l ~ ~ A 15" . date -- Fina 6l ~- ug. ~ for start ~ of hearing ~ 58 ~ ~ days j_ ~ ` . ~ --- Bond 125 -- Oct. 12 ' t '~ date ~ 4~ . . ~ ~ 30 ~ days hJ 15~ A End of Nov. 14 initial suspension period 31 days *' 18fi End of Dec. ~2 extended ~~ suspension period days.. ? Y--- Date of final e determination 1 ., TESCO may place requested rates in effect, unless effective date has been suspended bj~ the city (Sec. ~3 (a) },~ if no complaint filed by this da#e city may consider rate application by "informal proceeding." t~therwise, formal hearing is required {Sec. 43 {c} }. City must "enter on" a hearing (formal or informal) on the rate increase on or before this date (Sec. 43_(c) ). TESCO may place new rates, not to exceed the requested rates, into effect under bond, if city has made no final • determination by this date {Sec. 43 {e} ). TESCO may place requested rates into effect if {a} not already being collected underbond, and (b) city bas not extended suspension-period ~Se~c. 43 (d) }. TESCO may place requested rates into effect if not already being collected under bond. Requested rates deemed approved if city has not made a f inaj determination by this~date and TESCQ discharged on refund bond, if one is in effect (Sec. 43 (d) }. The rates set by this final determination shalt be applicable only f rom and after the date of determina-ion (Sec. 43 , (d) }. The above timetable continues to run only until such lime as the city may make a final ,~~ determination on the requested rate increase. When such a final determination is made, any further proceedings must be by appeal to the Public Utilit}~ Commission or the courts. ' These dates may be modified by the Commission for good cacsse. " Actual number of calendar days adjusted to refiec~~ ~a~te"ending on Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. DATE: 5-31-83 SU&IECT: Self-Propelled Sweeper DEPARTMEi~T Public. Wanks BACKGROUND: On May 27, 1983, at 10:00 A.M, bids on the above mentio;~~:d equipment were opened and they are outlined below, (5 bid specifications were mailed) EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT A & A Equipment ., Used equipment No Warranty Gasoline $20,0 0 Plains Machiner -0- $22 073,00 Alternate Bid •~ ~ $23 580.00 Hi-Wa Machiner -0- $19 512,40 Alternate Bid $23 012.00 This e ui ment was recommended in the mana ement stud a roved b Council and will be used for swee in the streets before and after cons~tru_ction, seal _. ~~ coatin and overla in At the resent time this is bein achieved b use of our coventional swee er and b hand. The diesel unit is less costl to o erate and re air costs are lower with the additional cost of 3 499.b0 amortized over the avera e life of 'this unit IS ears is 194.42 er month. This cost would ._._..._ _._._ _. ^_...w_..__..~...,.._......_ _...._..._._.......____ be overshadowed b the lower o era~tin and maintenance cost, as_ outl_ined above.~_~ . ~r, , ,~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approveldisap rove the purchase of one 1 Rosco Self ~~~,. e t ~ ~ 0 2 012 00 f o H ' -W M~chinerv . ~___~_ BUDGETED ITEM: YES ~ __ NO ACCOUNT R: .~-.ter- ~. ~....-~..~. r it ,~,..,.J.~ CITE ~F NDRTH I HL.A H L R C ND I LS s PUR~HA I P S NG DE A THE ~, NT N~ TH I~ R R HLAND HILLS TES AS star of tl~e illetro lex ~ p INVITATION TO BID AND B1D QUOTATION FORM VENDOR`S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: Request For: Sweeper Bid Opening Date: 5-16-83 Date: Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until lO: 00 A.M. May 16, 1983 City of North Richland Hills, P. 0. Box 18609 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: 817-281-0041 ITEM ` DESCRlPTiON QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 ~ Swee er per s ecif ication "Gasoline" 1 ea $19 , 512 , 4 2 Alternate • Sweeper per spef iciation "Diesel" ~ Pa S 2 ~ ~1 ~ ~ SUBTOTAL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 0 TE Net oy 3O DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH IN SUBMITTING THIS SID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC• RI ND HILLS: DELIVERY IN DAYS FROM CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas• CHASIR~G DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- ing Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali• LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- ties, or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its TUTES A 61Iy p,IN~TCONT ACT. , best interests. ALL SALES AND U ETA E T . H1-~a l~aChlner Com an S X S 0 BE EXCLUD• COMPANY. y ~ P Y ED FROM BID, PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.0.6. CITY OF prP~,i~~_ent NORTH RICHLAND'HILLS,TEXAS. _ -- -'''~~~`~~~'`'' PHONE NUMB 2 81 8 SIGNATURE. ATE: `1 ~ ~ 1t . GENERAL CONDITIONS EQUIPMENT BIDS 1. Equipment other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series identifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of equipment desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications may be acceptable provided such variation, in each instance, is noted on the bid. The City of North,Rich~.and Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be~conclusive. 3. The unit shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the unit made ready for operation. 4. Bidder must fill in alI information asked for in the blanks provided under each item. Failure to completely describe the equipment may result in rejection ,of the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. S. The bidder shall attach hereto,, as part of this bid, regularly printed • literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the equipment he proposes to furnish. • b. Manufacturer's standard warranty for parts and labor must be included in this bid. . 7. For bids on more than~one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases frog more than one bidder if • it deems such action to be in its best interest. _ GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS .. _.__._ In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by-the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS .Proposals deposited with the Gity of .North Richland Hills cannot 'be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals.. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the tine set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things .true and accurate and~free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because ~of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulat'ed~ for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to"waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise ~in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of~form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind, However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right~to waive any irregularities and to Hake the award in the best interests of the~City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS ~~ The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals :ray be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as ° stated in the advertisement. (b} Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) L'~nbalanced value of any items. (d) ~~'here the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation kith the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. ,, • r S. DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS . . Bidders may be disqualified and their. proposals not considered, among-other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: .~ (a} Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in ~~ more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation - with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such Iitigation~is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded . ~ - b. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be Wade by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City~of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (bo) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before `said City`s next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the IoW bidders. 1. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills . City Manager. Such consent 'shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS k~henever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information ~~ith respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any w.ay constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. bR~.~~D DAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand nave or equal" purchase description is :.ncluded in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the teem "brand name" includes identification of products by rake and nodel.) r 1~ .. ' s ~a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by . a "brand name or -equal" description, such identification is intended . to be descriptive, but not restrictive, ar~d is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products Will be considered for award if such products are . clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand Warne products ~~ referenced. . . (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an' "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. t ' ~ THIS SPECIFICATION IS INTENDED TO DESCRIBE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A NE~1 "SWEEPER" SELF-PROPELLED Sweeper Specifications ~Conf orms _ Yes No Engine: 160 cu inches (68HP @ 2800 RPM} Gasoline '~ Ignition System: 12 volt, starter, key start X Transmission: Hydrostatic X Brush Drive.: Roller chain trough hydraulic motor X Tires: 7.75x15 4 ply X Wheelbase: 140 inches X Sweeping Angle: 30° left to 70o Right X Brush Core: ~ Steel, 7 f eet x 32 inches filled X Brush Filler: Wafer-type, polypropylene steel wire; X or combination Brush Pressure:, Float-type or hydraulic pressure X Brush Speed: Up to 150 RPM's ~ ~ X Brush Left: Hydraulic X~ Brush Cover: Steel full len th X g ~- X Cab: ROPS enclosed with air conditioning and heating Lights: Cab, headlights, backup, stop lights and one X revolving amber beacon on top Brush Warter System: Approx. 135 gallon of ethulene X Warter tank or equal Finish: Standard Factory colors X Steering: Power ~ X Warrant En ine Parts 6 Months Service6 Months y g x Sweep Unit Parts 6 Months Service6 Months X Location where warranty work will be performed At Your' city or in our shop at 3612 Co~nerce, Dallas, Texas de endin on th nature o~ the work p g e I ` { ~ ' ~ ~; ~ ~ "; . .. s a The undersigned here by offers to sell to the City of North Richland Ni 11 s , on the tQrms and conditions contained i n this proposal , the general conditions and the specifications and any , other, condi ti ons that ma be .attached and fu rther . y cert~ fy that our attached proposal subm~ tted by Hi~-Way Machinery Co . compl ~ es w~ th all the specifications as outlined i n the City of North Ri chland's i specification, be i t further specified that any non compliance with the ~~ City of North Richland Hills specifications is to be outlined in detail statin said vend No ~ g ors exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland H i 1 l s acceptance ' of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hi 11 s has ful 1 right to accept or reject any and al 1 ~ propos al s , or any part there of. Company Name .THIS MUST 6E SUBMITED WITH vENDOR QUOTATION. ,~- .~ .,. .. May 16 , 1983 Date HiTWay Machinery Company i DATE: June 13, 1983 ~~~'~:,~ ,?BJECT: Re est of CBS Blackhawk Cable TV for Rate Increase ~3EPA.~RTM~NT : Administration ~3AC'r;GROUND: Attached is a co of the consultant's report reconunending the . ~ .. requested rate relief . As provided in the City's Ordinance regulating cable television, a ublic hearing has been advertised to be held this date. The ordinance further provides that, if no action is taken on the request within 90 days of its subn~.ssion, the requested rates are automatically approved. The 90 day period expires July 4, 1983, which would peri~~it the. Council .to defer action on this matter until June 27th, 1983. rir r ~ ~ - ~ ~ r; Z ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ .r ... . ++.~.+r.~..r ` • ~ y ` ~~ ,: . ~fl:'-'~ ~E~.'~~~L,Ii: ~,C'fIO~ti RE~Ui~.r ~: Defer action on the requested rate increase until .._..... June 27th, 1983 M~t:~.;;ETx:D ITEM: ~,-~,~,Tj1~,~~ ~,Tt?MBER 'i•~v .l.J... ~ yES ~;C~ ~~ _~. .. ?a: y1h r;. i- <. CBS/BL-CK HAWK CABLE COMVlLTNIGATTONS CORD • 305 LOOP 820 NE, SUITE 410 HURST, TEXAS 76053 (817) 589-7791 JOSEPH W. HIPPLE, III VICE PRESIDENT Dear Roger April 4, 1983 I respectfully request that CBS/Black Hawk Cable Communications Corp. be granted a hearing for the purpose of increasing the basic rate for Cable Television service from $6.50 per month to $8.50 per month and the additional outlet rate from $1.50 per month to $3.25 per month. We are also seeking a $.50 per month converter maintenance charge since we are experiencing tremendous losses and damages to our converters. Since we began operation we have held our rates even though costs have risen tremendously. For example, the automatic pass through of copyright fees granted in the franchise has never been utilized since we wanted to hold our rates as long as possible. Unfortunately, this can't be done any longe"r• We have received major increases .in operating expenses. Inflation, postage, copyright fees,~property taxes, electricity, gasoline, construction costs, and programming costs are the primary .contributors to these drastic increases. We have also experienced increases in our costs for carrying Home Box Office, Showtime and Cinemax. We have no alternative but to increase Home Box Office and Showtime from $7.50 per month to $9.50 per month and Cinemax from $6.50 per month to $8.50 per month on July 1 , 1983• We have never charged for these services on an additional outlet, but we will start charging $5.00 per service on July 1, 1983, also. Since 1978 CBS/Black Hawk has served the City of North Richland Hills with the finest entertainment and quality services the Cable Television industry has to offer. We have met and exceeded every franchise requirement and have continuously kept the North Richland Hills system a state-of -the-art showcase. As these increases are something we don't relish getting or giving it is in the interest of the City to have a financially strong company that can continuously offer more services to its customers 0 and franchising authority that make Cable TV such an exciting promise. ~ 1 ~ ~ r ~+ i Page 2 April 4, 1983 We respectfully request that a hearing be scheduled for April 25, 1983 so that we can share with you a review of the economic forces that make such an unwelcome request so vitally necessary. Please feel free to give me a call should you: have questions. Sincerely, Mr • Roger Line Ci y Manager P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 cc: City Council members, City Secretary,_Mayor I • City of North Richland Hills P. 0. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Sir/Madam: 5108 Holiday Lang North Richland Hills, ~ May 12, 1983 This is to voice my opposition to the propoa~d rate hike sought by the CBS/Blaekhawk Cable Communications Corp. I was in one of the last locations in the city to have cable become available and subscribed to what was then the complete package as soon as installation wag possible . This included ~ and presently includes) the basic cable plug the pay channels h~BO, Showtime , and Cinemax wired for two Tv sets . I have been paying 29.50 per month for this service a Other pay channels have been made available by Black Hawk but I have leapt the same subscription. Under the proposed rate hike , my monthly payment for the Same service would be ~~4.75. That is well over 50~ increase in rates which I feel is excessive. I feel that an increas® in rs,tes is warranted due to cost of living increases and inflation but not to that extent . , One reason that the company should not have substantial increases is because they have not provid®d the service promised when - advertis ing to potential subscribers . rather Radar was a most d$s irable feature~~: of -the cable system when I subs cribed and probably influenced me to take the cable and dismantle my outside antenna. after only a few months , the Weather radar wa.s removed from the .system and hasn't been seen since. I have called the company many times and hs,ve written a question concerning weather radar twice on the monthly statements . I have been given several explanations and each time , except the last , was told that they were working on the weather radar lines or th€zt they were going to substitute a national weather service crlannel complete with national weather radar. The ls.st query, which was only a few days ago, obtained the answer that they had dro~d all plans for weather radar or a net i onal weather s e rv i. ce chanrle 1. In conclus ion, a s izeable increase in rates will result in a reduction of ~,y subscription drop pay channels in order to af~rd the monthly payments . I~f others react in a similar manner, the company will not see much increase in profits . ~ -/G ' ~~ _ . .. _, Thanks ~'or your consideration, ~ ' Harold R. Dobkins ~ ; ~~ _ _.__. _. _.__ _~ . _: ___.------ __- ___.__.._ .__ __.~ f X V . ?+: -~ fir, - f ~ _---'-.'_.._ f.---~._._~___._---- G ~ .. , i L ~ .. ._. __.~~..._.~_..~,. 1 f~ ~/ i. !.s ~ ~ ~ u ` i C$SjBLACKHAWK CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -Rate Request Dated April 4, 1983 Affected Cities: Haltom City -North Richland Hills ASSQCIATED UTILITY SPECIALISTS c- P. U. BOX 3114 iRVING, TEXAS 75061 ~~z~~~ CBS/BLACKHAWK CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Rate Revision Request Dated-April 4, 1983 Public Utility Status of CATV It is generally recognized that Cable Television operations do not fit into the basic definition for a Public Utility in the sense that the are not entrusted with the furnishin to the en y g g eral public of essential services and/ or products available to the public from only one source. CATV does not have the monopolistic characteristics of a Public Utility, and does not en'o the protective covenants which 1lterall uarantee to a P J y ~ Y g ublic Utility a profit from it s operations. CATV faces strong competition from the followin sources: Network Television, Local Pro rammin Pa g g g, y TV, and Home Television Movies. At the same time, theaters are actively competing for a share of the entertainment revenue dollar. The Public Utility Regulatory Act of 1975 (Texas) carefully recognized the non-utility status of CATV in exem tin such enterprises from the re ulator control of p g g y the Public Utility Commission (Section 3-C-2a PVRA}. As a consequence of the above factors, CATV is characterized by High Investor Risk Factor and Demand For Management Competence to offset the obvious dis- advantage of the High Risk Factor. The granting of franchises for CATV has been characterized by frenzied competition which often relegated "profit motive" to an initial position of secondary importance. Without the avail- ability of competitive advantages} in programming offered, CATV companies must rely on quality of service and effective management in order to maintain competitive status in the industry. Rate Structure is extremely important, reflecting extreme pressure from the points of Customer Preferences and Investor Expectations. If rates are non-competitive, the customer will exercise his option and choose an alternate entertainment mode (likewise with Service). By the same token, if rates are too competitive (reflectin art ifically Iow comparisons} neither Customer Service Dem g ands nor Investor Expectations can be satisfied. Requested Rates For purposes of comparison the Requested Rates are illustrated below in relation to the company's current rates and those of two other Local Area `systems: CBS/Blackhawk Service Current Requested System "A" System "B" Basic Rate $ 6.50 8.50 7.95 7.00 Converter Maint. 0 050 0 0 ° Home Box Office 7.50 9.50 6.95 7.00 Showtime Cinemax 7,50 6.50 9.50 8.50 6.95 1.95 7.00 7.00 Movie 9.75 9.75 8.95 7.00 Additional Outlet I.50 3.25 4.95 2.50 NBO 0 5.00 6.95 3.00 ST 0 5.00 6.95 3.00 C - 0 5.Oa~~~~ - ~~ - 1.95 3.00 M 0 5.00 8.95 3.00 If we view the rate structures on an average customer basis encom passing basic service plus two optional programming services, the com an requesting an increase of 31.77 i P y is in ex ~~ ~~ n rates which will result in rates 18.2' cess of those of System A and 28,67 in excess of System "B" rates. It is also noteworthy that System "A" is in the process of f ilin for rate increase. The Service Reputation of the CB g a S System is Superior to that of both System "A" and System "B", Current Operating Status Certain documentation was requested of the company in su ort of it's request, namely; PP rate A. Operating Statement For Twelve Months Ended 12-31-82 B. Balance Sheet As of 12-31-82 C. Source and Application of Funds 6-15-82 through 12-31-82 D. Year End Subscribers By Category of Service 12-31-82 and 12-31-81 E. Comparison of Revenues: Current Rates Vs. Requested Rates F. Allocation Explanations: Operating Statement and Balance Sheet The requested data was furnished in timely fashion and is attached her eto as exhibits identified alphabetically above. Brief comments will follow relative to each item of documentation, but it should be borne in mind t the company's own 0 erations cover hat P only a period of 199 days in 1982 (predecessor operations are reported for the period Januar 1-June 1 y 5, 1982), Exhibit "A" indicates Haltom City operations to have produced a NET LOSS PRIOR TO FIT of $433,000 - company operations in North Richland Hills reflect a NET LOSS PRIOR TO FIT of $611,000. It should be noted that the cam an has elected to capitalize Leased Items in lieu of ex P y pensing Lease Payments. Exhibit "B" (Balance Sheet} indicates for the company's TOTAL NORTH OPERATIONS that the NET VALUE of plant and Equipment exceeds EQUIPMENT LEASE LIABILITIES PLUS OWNER'S EQUITY by $386,363. Exhibit "C" (Source and Application of Funds) reflects operatin loss from g Exhibit "A", and a reduction in Working Capital. Exhibit "D" de icts rowth in numbers of subscribers b sate or - r P g y g y g owth for both Haltom City and North Richland Hills Systems are good for the year 1982. Exhibit "E" represents the application of 1982 "Year End" subscribers b category to both Requested Rates and Current Rates. y As such, true revenue differentials can be ident ified as shown below: Haltom City N. Richland Hills Revenue: Current Rates $1023287 $1457198 Revenue: Requested Rates $1523288 $2166095 Differential $ 500001 $ 708897 of Differential 48.97 48.7' The difvferent'ial shown represents the actual additional revenues to be ~~nticipated if the requested rates were applied to 1982 "year end" subscribers. 13~~sic Growth Factor has not been applied to these calculations. .~~. -2- . 1982 Actual vs. Projected 12 Months at Re uested-Rates The table immediately following depicts for Haltom Hills franchises 1982 o era ,City and North Richland p tang results (per Exhibit 'A" attached) com ared to a projected 12 month operating period under the re ue p from December 31, 1982). The fo q sted rates (dating llowing factors are utilized in formulation of the projected 12 month operating resutls: Basic Growth Factor is predicated upon 1982 trend: Haltom City = 7.767 . North Richland Hills = 4.627 Franchise Expenses are calculated on 1982 actual lus add revenues to be xe perienced. P itional Depreciation Expense is calculated on applicant com an 's 199 days of 1982 annualized times c P y actual for _ apital addition growth factor annualized. Capital Addition Growth Factors" are: Haltom City - 1.03112 North Richland Hills - 1.03208 Other Expenses are calculated on company's actual for • times Basic Growth Fact 1982 annualized ______._ or . Federal Income Taxes are calculated at Statutor Rate w' • ment for Investment Tax Cred' y lthout ad~ust- zts and Deferral Attributable to Accelerated Depreciation. Projected Revenues are incremented by Basic Growth Factor. Highlights of Projected Operatin Statement Total Revenues Increased Total Expenses Decreased Net Prior to FIT Increased Net Profit Increased Net Profit Return on Owner's Equity .Haltom City N. Richland Hills $654,495 $839,169 $(11,1.56) $(62,352) $665,651 $901,521 31.357 30.137 7.657 6.787 7.347 6.037 Action Recommended On Rate Application: Approval of the Com an 's a • ~~ P y pplication is recommended. The company's operating statements indicate Pre-Ta . of $433,000 and $617,000 in 1982 for o x Losses perations in Haltom City and North Richland Hills respectively (166 days predecessor and 199 da s CB It is a certainty that existin r y S operation). g ate structure was established on a "franchise acquisition" basis rather than an operating projection basis. A twely month operation under the requested rate structure will e profits of $232 651 in H ~ produce pre-tax alton City and $284,521 in North Richland Hills - this is equivalent to $52 and $47 per basic subscriber account er p year. 12 Month Projected Operating Results 1982 Actual vs. Projection at Revised Rates CBS/Blackhawk Cable Revenues Basic HBO Showtime Cinemax Movie Expanded Basic Additional Outlet Converter HBO/ST/C Additional Outlet Installation Basic Growth Factor Total Revenues Ex enses: anchise her Operating Depreciation Lease Interest Total Expenses Net Prior FIT (Loss} FIT at Statutory Rate Net Return Earned Net Profit (Loss) Return on Plant Investment Return on Equity Haltom City North Richland Hil 1982 is 12 Months 1982 12 Months Actual Revised Rate Actual Revised Rate i $ 9s 7, o00 34,000 935,000 235,000 13,000 203,000 $ (433,000) (lyy,180) $ (233,820) (23.700 Reflects Equipment Lease Liability Capitalized $ 422,790 ~~~ $ 589,968 343,254 496,242 203,148 291,042 161,772 225,126 68,196 97,110 18,533 28,928 12,735 101,517 36,060 50,322 112,200 246,240 24,000 39,000 118,207 100,074 $1,641,495 $1,427,000 $2,266,169 60,180 40,000 73,567 1,027,798 1,337,000 1,439,205 251,687 349,000 372,929 0 20,000 0 69,179 298,000 95,947 $1,408,844 $2,044,000 .$1,981,648 $ 232,651 $ (617,000) $ 284,521 $ 107,019 $ (283,820) $ 130,880 $ 125,632 $ {333,180) $ 153,641 7.65' (23.357) 6.787 5.217 ~ 4.347 7.34' 6.03' .~~-~ -1ti '~ .. . ~~ BLACK ~iAWK CABLE CORP , UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEtfENTS (Dollars in Thousands) 1982 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS i• •~AN. 1 - JUNE 15 REVENUE Primary ~ 193 Pay ~ 412 Secondary 23 Installation 14 Other 0 TOTAL REVENUE 6422 EXPENSES Pay Programming 221 Other Programming lg Local Origination ~ 6 Engineering 101 Sales 41 General & Administrative ].94 Franchise Fees 17 TOTAL OPEP~ATTNG EXPEI~TSES 604 OPEFATING PROFIT/(LOSS} 38 NON-OPEFATING EXPENSES depreciation/~.mort 152 Lease 20 Interest 248 TOTAL NON-OPEA,ATINC EXPENSES X20 ToTn~, rx~~FN~ES 1, 024 1'R f;-TAX 1'(?~f' ]'I'/ (LOSS ) ( 3$2 ) * Lease capitalized and depreciated, CBS JUNE 16 - FULL YEAR DEC. 31st 1982 245 438 486 ggg 27 50 25 39 2 2 785 1,42 242 469 28 46 11 17 145 246 81 128 231 431 23 40 3 1, 12 50 191 349 NA* 20 50 298 667 1,0?.0 2,044 ( 2~~)) ( U1~) -• -_._~ ' ` `'' V ., 1~ ~~. ,l;•~ i CBS/BLACK HAWK CABLE CORD, Balance Sheet 12 31 82 Total North Richland Hills North Assets: ________ Cash and Equivalents $ 22,887 $ 45,198 Accounts Receivable (Net} 27,280 75,679 . (}t~~er Current Assets ~ 22,415 63,604 Property, Plant & Equipment (Pdet Depreciation) 3,430,908 9,735,038 Total Assets $3,503,490 $9,920,119 Liabilities: Accounts Payable $ 200,973 $ 571,444 Equipment Lease Liabilities 832,704 2,362,871 Owners Equity 2,469,813 6,985,804 Total Liabilities/Owner's Equity $3,503,490 $9,920,119 NOTE: Property, Plant and Equipment includes items located in North Richland Hills plus an allocation of headend and microwave equipment necessar Y for system operation. This statement includes no intangible assets or asset revaluation, +' CBS/BLACK HAWK CABLE CORP. SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF FUNDS June 15, 1982 - December 31, 1982 (Dollars in Thousands) North Richland Hills Source of Funds Income Before Taxes $ 235 Depreciation ( } $ 197 Total 38 $( } Application of Funds Change in Working Capital $ 35 Ca ital Ex ends r ( y P p to es $ 60 Reduction in Lease Liability $ 73 ______. ' Total $ 98 r Net Funds Generated/(Required) $(136 } _______ Total North $(704) $ 558 $(146) $(103) $ I69 $ 207 $ 273 $(419) ti~ +~- ~ . . CBS/BLACK HAWK 1981 & 1982 Year End Subscriber Accounts BASIC MOVIE . SUBS HBO SHOWTIME CIN EXPANDED ----- Er~AX CHANNEL BAS I C ------ North Richland Hills 1981 5,295 .4,253 3,053 2 9 , 57 652 1982 5,184 4 353 2 ,553 2,213 830 487 f' . ~,~ ,.c- ~ . . NEW & OLD RATES NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SERVICE YEAR-END ~~ SUBS OLD RATES ANNUAL REVENUES NEW RATES ANNUAL REVENUES " T CHANGE Basic 5,184 $6,50 X451,152 $8.50 $589 968 $138,816 HBO 4,353 $7.50 X391,770 $9,50 $496 242 1 $ 04,472 S~~owtime 2,553 $1.50 $229 770 9 50 $ $291,042 $61,272 Cinemax 2,213 $6,50 $112,614 $8,50 $225 126 53 11 $ , 2 Additional Outlet 2,603 $1.50 $46,854 $3.25 $101 517 ~ 54 663 ~ s Converter Charge 8,381 $0.00 0 $0.50 $50 322 50 322 $ , NOTE: Annual Revenues = 1982 Year end subs x 12 months x e old rates, These numbers do not reflect actual revenues, _ . 4 -'~+ _~ -~ .•~. ~: ~.. i~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BLACK HAWK CABLE COP,P. JANUARY 1, 1982 - JUNE 15, 1982 REVENUE/EXPENSE ALLOCATION ASSUMPTIONS REVENUE Revenue figures were available by cit from the Y general ledger. No allocations were necessary, ,EXPENSES Pay Programming Pay programming expenses were classified in th e June 15, 1982 General Ledger as north and South onl . Allocations between cities were ~ y made on the basis of pay programming expenses as a percent of total pay programming expenses at December 31, 1982 per CBS/Black Hawk records. All Other ' Operating Expenses All other operatin ex enses w • g p ere classified In the June 15, 1982 General Ledger as North, Sout~i or Corporate. Allocations between cities were made on the basis of average city subscriber count as a percentage of average total Black Hawk subscribers for the period January 1, 1982 and June 15, 1982. Non-Operating Expenses P1on-operating expenses (depreciation amortization ~ , lease payments and interest charges) were detailed in the June 15, 1982 General Ledger as North, South or Corporate. Allocations between cities were made on the basis of city-specific assets as a percentage of total CBS/Black I~awk assets at December 31, 1982 per CBS records. CBS/BLACK HAWK CABLE 12/31/82 ESTIriA.TED BALANCE SHEET BY FRANCHISE ALLOCATION BASIS The Balance Sheet as of 12/31/82 is a proforma Balance Sheet. The actual closing process for the acquisition of tie Black Hawk System b CBS was completed in January 1983, y Balance Sheet Account Method of Allocation i• CASH: ______ CASH EQUIVALENTS: RECEIVABLES & RELATED ALLO«Ar1CF: PREPAID EXPENSES: PROPERTY PLANT & EQUIPMENT: (P.P.E) ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: ArSOUNTS DUE AFTER 0 P~~; ( ) YEAR : , Number of subscribers within the region (North, South). $10,000 = performance bond in North Richland dills Number of subscribers of each franchise to total subscribers Ratio of P.P.E. cost of each franchise to P.P.E, cost of the CBS/Black Hawk System, Includes items located in each franchise area plus an allocation of cost of Head end, Microwave and Ogler equipment necessary-for system operation. The depreciation expense is allocated in the ratio of P.P.E, cost of each franchise to the P.P.E, cost of the CBS/Blackhawk system. Based on the ratio of total assets of each franchise to the total assets of CBS/Black Hawk. Obligations for capital leases and purchase option are allocated in the ratio of P.P.E, cost of each franchise to P.P.E. cost of the CBS/Black Hawk system. Balance Sheet as of June 15, 1982 (used in the Preparation of Sources an App cations o Fun s") is primarily based on the Statement of Adjustment Assets and Adjustment Liabilities as of that date as prepared by Coopers & Lybrand, Certified Public Accountants. . ~ DATE: June 13,1983 ____ .., -- ~. uBJECT: ~ Appeal Hearing ~EPART?~ENT: Administration :~~.~.C~GP.~'Jlti'~: If A eal Hearin is ranted a date needs to be set for the hearin . It will have to be advertised and ro ert owners notified 15 da s rior to { the hearin . ~} l ,Hearing can. be _set for July ]„Y, 1983. -.~.._._.._ - - ..._ - ~ ______- -- .......,..._ .r.......,...,.. ...._ __...__ ._.- _-_......._._.~......__- .... ~.._...._.__ .........__._.r,,,~_- - • ,ter, r..~..,~,~.~... n-r_ ;. ,,, 7" f { ~. r. ~1J~ • t .~~,:vt.,a.w. , :~_ ~ ~.~~k ~t~,{~ ~~' 'Y, .. ,...~. Approve/Disapprove :,j~: , .;..~ .. .... .'.r~, _~N/A -- 11`0 N/A 1i4 r is . r GARRISON & WHITE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1701 WEST FREEWAY ^ FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 ^ ~SZ7) 332.6311 William N. Garrison Ledford E. White June 7, 1983 . Mr. Rodger Line ,City Manager City of NOrth Richland Hills P. 0. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Zoning Application Nos. PZ 83-15 and PZ 83-16 -- Dear Mr. Line: My application and the application of James Rust for zoning change were denied by the Planning. and Zon ni g om fission at their meeting held on May 26, 1983. We would like to appeal the decision on their part and ask far a re-consideration and action by the Council at the earliest opportunity. - It is our understanding that the matter could be placed on the agenda at the Council meeting on Monday, June 13, for action at the meeting on Monday, June 27. We respectfully request that it be so placed on the agenda and will appreciate a call from your office if there is any further action which either or both of us need to take to accomplish this. Yours very truly, GA,, ISO & WHITE William N./Garrison r1 U WNG:dz BBZ/WNG ~~ ,tip . June 1, 1983 City Council North Richland Hills 7301 NE loop 820 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Attention: Ms. Jeanette Moore RE: Request to Appear Before City Council, June 13th Meetin 9 Dear M s . Moore f respectifuliy request time on the agenda of the June 1 th Cit ' 3 y Counc i 1 meeting to address them for approximately 5 minutes. 1 am Curren 1 ' man of the Advisor Board of th t y char- Y e Northeast Sector Office of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse. My purpose in addressin h ' is to appeal to them to dedica g t e Council to a small percentage of the cities alcohol tax rebate funds from the, state to help support the services rov i ded b Northeast Sector office of T.C.O.A.D, p Y our A. We currently are providing services for the citizens and schools of some thirteen cities in northeast Tarrant County includin North Richland ' Severa 1 of these c i t i es are g H ills. already providing support from their alcohol tax funds. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. You can contact me a office number, 283-4461, ext 250 or conta t my ct our director, Karen Poidevin at 485-4146, Sincerely, Gary Bryan{ n u ~ . ~ Ito art y ~c an 1 s exas ~~ ,. Lx . 'w ~_ -- -- ~~'' T0: Rodger Line DATE: June 8, 1983 City Manager FROM: Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Platting & Zoning Cases for City Council June 13, 1983 PS 83-43 Request of Cross Roads Development APPROVED Company and Burk Collins Investments for replat of Lots 4R-1 & 4R-2, Block 10, Snow Heights North Addition. PS 83-45 APPROVED Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley for lat of Oak Hills Addition f final . p PS 83-49 Request of Alan W. Hawn for replat of APPROVED Lots 8R, 9R, & IOR, Lonsdale Addition. PZ 83-25 Request of W. Brown Custom Builders, APPROVED Inc. to rezone some tracts of land in (60 were contacted) W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, R.P. Barton Survey, Abstract 175, and T. Akers Survey, Abstract 19, from their present classifications of Planned Development, Agriculture, and Local Retail to proposed classifications of Multi-Family, Planned Development, and Specific Use-Golf Course. This property is located on the south side of Northeast Loop 820 and is bounded on the east by Meadow Lakes Addition and on the south by Fossil Creek Trails Addition. 1817) 2610041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TX 76118 To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records ~ `~ DATE : June 8 , 198 3 SUBJECT: _ _ DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: proposed Meadow Crest Drive. ~ ' Burk. Collins laps to build a stri •~ „ • En ineers .comments. .__ ... _ . _. CYTY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: app royal or denial ..ter .~ ,~ -~..~..~......~~r ......~....~.~.~r....~. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A _______ ~~ ,~a • ,,~ Page 2 ,~ P & 2 Minutes ~. May 2b, 1983 .PS 83-42 - Ms, N e motion to a pprove . APPROVED 3-42 ~subj ect to the Engineer's comments, This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. 2, PS 83-43 Request of Cross Roads Develo went P Company and Burk Collins Investments, Inc. for replat of Lots 4R-1 & 4R-2, Block 10, Snow Heights North Addition. . Burk Collins came forward. He said they plan to build a strip retail . center on this site. Chairman Tucker asked Mr, Collins if he had received the City Engineer's comments, .. Mr. Collins said he had not. Chairman Tucker showed him a copy. He said there were only two items on it and one was a staff function. Mr. Hannon asked Mr. Bronstad if the City had received the utility _ easements other that what was shown on ~~ the plat. - Mr. Bronstad said they had not, PS 83-43 Mr, Hannon made the motion to approve APPROVED PS 83-43 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. 3, PS 83-45 Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley for final plat of Oak Hills Addit' , John Barfield came fo rd. He said they had been ou the hall discussing s of the items with some of the ghbors . Mr . Barfield said he here to represent the 5 owners this property which encluded himself, George Boring, Kenneth Whiteley, Bob Jones, and Arnold Pair. He said their engineer was Doug Long. Mr. Barfield said they are just about ready to start the development in this area. He said there are other e builders and developers who are R waiting for them to get it started, ~r ~ ~ ~ s• r' ~ • . ., r 1 (,, l ~. . KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas May 18, 1983 P1 anni ng & Zoni ng Commission City of North Richland Hi 11 s 7301 N, E, Loop 820 North Richland Hi 11 s, Texas 16118 Re: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH P,ICHLAND HILLS, SNOW HEIGHTS ADDN,, LOTS 4R-1 & 4R-2, BLOCK 10, REPEAT, PS 83-43, GRID 112 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and of fe r the following comments: 1. Ai 1 uti 1 i ty companies should be notified re a rdi n the ro o d 9 9 p p se repl at. 2, The ownership and/or platting of the contiguous property north of lot 4-R-1 should be shown on the plat. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this su~di v i s i on please do not hesitate to cal 1. - _ ' RICHARD W, ALBI N, P, E, RWA/1 jc cc; Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager h1r, Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAcS•~6021 • 817/283.6211 • METRO/267.3367 .. ~~~ ~ - /~ DATE:__~Iun~_-$, 1983... SUBJECT: _ • DEPARTMENT : pl ann in ~ and Zon in BACKGROUND: This ro ert is located on the Northwest Corner of Amundson n . ~ .. Precinct Line Road . There was discussion re ardin the dischar w t their En e r t h w '~ • The Plann in and Zon in Commis s i r o ., la s b' t ~ ~ • 4 • • . - ~' - - CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: approval or denial of plat BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: ___w_~_a.rrr_~.~~___~~rr~.~_r_r___~r~~._________~~~r __~____w.__r~_~... r..~.~_r_~.r ~.~__r.r __~r~___r. ~... ~..rwr.. t Page Z P & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 . PS 83-42 .. APPROVED 2. PS 83-43 i• PS 83-43 APPROVED 3. PS 83 ;45 Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 83-42 subject to the Engineer`s comments. This motion was secon ~ d by Mr. Wood and the motion Carrie 5-0. Request of Cross Roads De opment Company and Burk Collin nvestments, Inc, for replat of Lo , 4R-I & 4R-2, Block I0, Snow Hei s North Add~tin„_ Burk Collins ca~'e f orwa • rd . He said they plan touild a stri retail ~, p center on its site. Chair~~n Tucker asked Mr, Collins if he '~d received the Cit En ineer' Y g s ents. Mr. Collins said he had not, Chairman Tucker showed him a copy. He said there were only two items on it and one was a staff function. Mr. Hanlon asked Mr. Bronstad if the City had received the utility _ easements other that what was shown on the play. - Mr. Bronstad said they had 'not, Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 83-43 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley for final plat of Oak Hills Addition. John Barfield came forward . He said they had been out in the hall discussing some of the items with some of the neighbors. Mr. Barfield said he was here to represent the 5 owners of this property which encluded himself, George Boring, Kenneth Whiteley, Bob Jones, and Arnold Pair. He said their engineer was Doug Long. Mr. Barfield said they are just about ready to start the development in this area. He said there are other builders and developers who are waiting for them to get it started. .~k' +~t ~ _. . ~ ~ • Page 3 P & Z Minutes - May 2b, 1983 Doug Long, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He said they had received the City Engineer's letter and have sent a response letter addressing each comment. Mr. Long said they were out discussing with the neighbors item ~~1 of the Engineer's comments regarding discharging water to adjacent property. He said they do not propose to change the size of the culverts or lower the flow line to the culverts. Mr. Long said Mr. Barfield owns some property to the north of this property and they may be coming back in later to develop it and at some time in the future, there will probably be a need for aconcrete lined channel from the railroad to the north. He said, at that time, there would need to be some fill on the property just north of the railroad and create a ditch. Mr. Long said there is a massive water line which goes through there, a 24 inch and a 12 inch, and they will request-the city's participation in that. He said they would also be building their half of Amundson Road and will request the city's participation in the extra widening. Mr. Long said they are requesting the Commission approve this request contigent on getting the railroad permits. He said they feel they will have no problem in getting them, but - they wanted the Commission's approval first. Chairman Tucker asked about the sanitary sewer when it leaves their property. He asked if they had the necessary easements for it. Mr. Long said they have one off-site easement and Mrs. Hamilton has agreed to letting them have one, but they , have not gotten the paperwork done yet, and also, Tarrant County has been ' approached for an easement. ~d' ,1t+ ~,: .. . Page 4 ' . ~~ P & Z Minutes May 26, 19$3 l Chairman Tucker asked about the double box culverts, the two 4 feet by 5 feet; arn't they increasing the amount of run-off in a shorter period of time. Mr. Long said when you do any development, you increase the amount of run-off. He said they have about a third of the drainage area that they are developing and someday, the culvert may have to be increased. Mr. Long said they would be building up their land and filling in and will be above the top of the culvert at the railroad; they do not want to be below it. He said they would try to maintain their slabs at least two above the railroad area so they will not have a back-up of flooding. Mr. Long said they have designed their's for the 100 year storm. PS 83-45 Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve APPROVED PS 83-45 subject to the Engineer's comments with the exception of items ~~3, 4, b, 1, & 11 which were addressed - ~ ~ by the consulting Engineer, and- - subject to them showing on the plat the minimum finished floor elevations at least two feet above the railroad as stated by Mr. Long. Mr. Long said they would agree to one foot. Mr. Hannon amended his motion to "at least one foot above the railroad. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. 4. PS 83-48 Request of TLB-GSC Enterprises fo preliminary plat of Lot 5, B, and Block C, College Addition. Dick Per ,Teague Nall & Perkins, c orward to represent TLB-GSC nterprises. He said they had received the City Engineer's comments and have responded to them. Mr, Perkins said they are in agreement with the comments, but would like some clarification and direction, or a ~'tit:'~j4 ~. ~ _ . ~ +. t~ ~ wen D. Long, P. E. CONSULTING ENGINEER May 24, 1983 Mrs. Wanda Calvert Planning and~Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 16118 Re: Oak Hi 11 s Addition Final P1 at and Plans PS-83-45 Dear Mrs. Calvert: We have recei ved a copy of the City Engineer's Mr. Richard W ' ` ~, . A1b~n, P.E. letter dated May 18, 1983 pertaining to the ca boned file followin com p and have the g ments: 1. Surveying notes appear on the plat statin that all 9 ]ot corners shall be located prior to lot sales that Tarrant County has accepted in the recent past. 2. A permit will be re uested from ' q the St. Loins Southwestern _ Railroad for~the two sewer pipe crossin sand the will sent draw' g y be ~ngs.show~ng the proposed storm drain dischar e on to their ri ht-of-wa g g y at the locations shown. Normally the Railroad does not permit or approve an thin other than crossi • y •g ngs or parallel improvements in their right-of-way but we will forward them plans for their review. 3. We have shown the necessary fittin s to connect to ' 12" - g the ex~st~ng sub out left by the City improvements at point No. 19. All that is needed is to remove the plu and seta shor of i e ~~ g t length p p and 12 M.J. Gate Valve. 4. The 12" gate valve shown at point No. 14 is an in-tin Gate Val ~~ e 12 M.J. ve with 10 L.F, of 12 water pipe to hold valve in lace. The same applies to Point No. 19• p ~t will be an in-line M.J. Gate Valve. 5. The proposed sanitary sewer easement between Lots 26 and 21 B1 ock 1 will be labeled on the plat. 6. Statement of City's pro-rata olic statemen . p y~ t of City s street assessment policy; re-statement of permits from Railroad and T.P. & L • and statement as to City oversize participation. We have ~~ uested Cit also re- q y participation on Amundson Road., as discussed with Mr. Riddle. 1615 Precinct Line Road -- Suite 106 /~ ~ ,Hurst, Texas 76053 Phone 817 281-8121 R / ( . r ` ~ ~' ~ ~. " ~ May 24 , 1983 ~~, ~. ~ ' Mrs. Wanda Calvert ~" -2- 1. We are discharging water to the Rai 1 road ri ' in ght-of-way with no crease in size of their boxes or change to their flow lin • therefore, no maximum flow can be ca es, rried through these boxes other than that which has been carried in the as no than a is p t. Consequently, . g proposed through the Robertson property. The ex~st~ng ditch lies within some trees on the extreme ea their ro ert so n st end of p p y o adds ti onal eros~~ on ~ s expected. 8. The proposed compacted fill b the Cit 's Stand y Y standards ~s 95/ and Proctor and will be so noted on the fans. P 9. We will note that welded steel carrier ' the pipe w111 be used under railroad for the sewer crossings and will meet an ' re uirements of t ~ y additional q he Railroad on their permits. io. The proposed concrete draina a flume was s • lin g topped at the bulid~ng e with the possibility that this flume ma be used f ~dri vewa fo'r two y or a common Y lots, Nos. 6 and 1 of Block 1. We have no ob- jecti ons to extending the fi ume to the back 1 of ' advis line and w111 e T.P. & L , of the s d~ scharge s~ nce the s ~ s an eas not R.o.W, ement and 1i. our standard note states .that 22 lbs.- of li me per square yard or as required.by lime series test, with a co been fu Cat En Knee py 9 rn~shed the Y ~ g r. We do not feel that the amount needs to be ir~crea ~ f th1 s requl rement ~ s fol 1 owed sed by the City. If you have additional questions or comments leas ' p e gTVe me a call. 'nc rely, wnD. Ln, E. • Consul t1 ng ENg1 Weer ODL/ml ' ~ ~. KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas May 18, 1983 P1 anni ng & Zoni ng Cornmi ssi on City of North Richland Hi 11 s 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 16118 Re: 3-958, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, OAK HILLS ADDN. , PS 83-45, FINAL PL NS, GRID 62, 63, 11, 72 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. All property corner monumentation should be noted on the lat in accordance with Tarran P t County plat f ~ 1 ~ ng requl rements. 2. Written evidence from the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad•should be furnished to the City confirming that the rai 1 road com an has no ob'ection to the ' - P y• ~ proposed storm drain d~ scharge on their r~gh~-of-way at the location shown on the dra~nage_layout plan. ,~ 3. Fittings should be provided at Point No. 19 on the water la out sheet as re uired to Conn • y q ect the proposed 12-inch water 1 one to the exi sty ng 8-inch 1 i ne ~n Amundson Road J 4. We would suggest that a flanged X M.J. 12-inch gate valve be furnished at Amundson and Crane Drive Point No. 14~ connected to a flanged tee to prevent a possible high pressure blow off, Also we would recommend a flanged X M,J. 12-inch ate valve at Point No. 9 g 1. 5. The proposed ut i 1 i ty easement between 1 ots 26 and 27 of block 1 should be labeled "Sanitary Sewer Easement". . ~ 6. We would refer you to Items 8, 9, 13 and 14 of our review 1 etter dated October 14, 1981, reminding you of our comments re ardin pro rata and s ecial e g g p p rmit requirements. 7. We would note, for the record, that we rece i ved a cal 1 from Mrs, Mata Robertson who expressed concern regarding the additional . stormwater runoff she would receive on her property as a resul t of this development, She owns Tract ado. 46, of the David ~~oses Survey, Abstract l I50, This property i s 1 ocated north of the 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 780'1 • 817/283.6211 • METRO/267-3367 1 .~ ~ `, • ~ Page 2, P1 anni ng & Zoni ng Cor~mi ss i on, May 18, 1983 rai 1 road and receives stormwater discharges from the exi stn 2-4'x5' box culvert l o g Gated ~n the rail road right-of-way. The Developer's Engineer should demonstrate that the drama a channel on the Robertson r g p operty has sufficient capacity to handle at least a l0-year discharge as required by Subdivision Ordinance, 8, The proposed density of compacted fil 1 on al 1 streets re ui rin such fill should q g be noted on the plans. We would suggest a minimu~~ of 95~ Standard Proctor unless the Pub1 is Works Department e rmi is P a lower density. 9. It has been our experience that the railroad company normall re ui res welded steel ca y q. s1 ng carrler_pT pe under the railroad for sang tary sewer pipe crossings. We would request that the type of carver pipe approved by the St, Louis Southwestern Rai lroad- Company be noted on the plans for the- two sewer crossin s. - 9 ~10. We would re quest that the proposed concrete drainage flume located between lots 6 and 1 of block 1 be extended to the back of 1 of 6, Also TP&L should be advised of the proposed concentrated di scha r e onto their easement, g 11, We would request that 1 ime for stabilized subgrade under all streets be increased from 22 to 30 pounds per square yard unless a lime series test demonstrates justification of a lesser quantit to y achieve an optimum 1 evel of stabs 1 ~ zati on, as recommended b the Y testing 1 ab. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivi si n please do not hesitate to call. o ' R L . R'~IA/ 1 j c cc: Mr, Rodger N. Line, City Manager h1r. Gene` Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr•. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works . C `~ DATE : June 8 , 1983 SUBJECT:, PS 83-49 Replat of Lots 8R, 9R, and lOR, Lonsdale Addition DF,p~~~; Planning and Zoning . BACKGROUND: This property is located on the East side of Davis Bouleva rd a t Harwood Road . Mr. Hamm a reed to the En ineer's comments All corrections have been made. The Plannin and Zonin Commission recommended a royal of this re 1 sub' ect to the En ineer t s comments. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: a r BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: r~r--•~~+..a. ~rrr~rr~.-rrw~r.-rrr-.rr~.~rrr~rrrr~..r~.rr~-rr~.r---w-r-~.rr~..r...r .~..r r r=~r•r.~-r.~r~.r ~.rr..~r r rr..wr.. y' v'~~ ~ . ' Page 6 ~ P & Z Minutes ~ `_ May 26, 1983 ~` Mr. Perkins said he did not have the '. figures with him, but is is stated on the front of the drainage plans t~h were submitted to the city staff He said he thought it was 12 or 1 eet, Mr. Bronstad said he woul ave to ~~ have at least a 12 foot inimum. Chairman Tucker as again about item ~~ 7 . ., ~ . Mr. Bronsta aid the Commission should pu it~ subject to the staff review. Mr erkins said that would be fine th them, and if they wished, they ~~could restrict it to no building ,,, permits until the fire hydrants are in. FS 83-48 APPROVED I~r. Hannon made the mots on to approve PS 83-48 subject to the En ineer's g . comments, subject further to the developer providing adequate access to _ the two"drainage channell, subject to . ,-• the channels having a minimum paved . bottom of 12 feet in width and providing that no building permits be issued on this property until the fire protection has been provided as required in the City Ordinance which requires a 300 foot radius from fire hydrants. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 5. PS 83-49 ~~ Re uest of Alan W, Ha q mm for replat of Lots 8R, 9R, and IOR, Lonsdale Addition. -. .~ Mr. Hamm came forward. He said they have received the City Engineer's letter and their engineer, Doug Long, has answered them. Mr. Hamm said they see no problem with them. PS 83-49 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to a rove pp PS 83-49 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by • Mr. Woad and the motion carried 5-0. .~ ,. ~ ~ wen D. Long, P. E. CONSULTING ENGINEER May 24, 1933 Mrs. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hi 11 s 1301 N.E. Loop 820 .North Richland Nills, Texas 16118 Re: Lonsdale Addition - Lots 8-R, 9-R and IO-R - Replat of Lots 8, 9, ZO . and art of 11 - PS 83-49 Dear Mrs. Calvert: We have received a copy of the City Engineer's Mr. Richard W. A ' ~ 1 b~ n, P.E. } • letter dated May 18, 1983 pertaining to the above file and h ' ave the following cor~nents: 1. If the City has not notified the utility com anies we w' ha t P ~ ~ 11 be ppy o do so. 2. Iron pins will be set at all lot corners and will be s o noted on the plat. - 3. The existin zonin of commer ' ' 9 9 coal w~ll.be noted on the plat. 4. A small scale vicinity map will be added to the lat. P .5. A new fire hydrant will be added to the tans on the ' i n fr n _ ~~p east s~ de o t of Lot 9 R off the existing 12 main. If you have any additional comments lease ' is ~ ~ p give me a call. Your assistance appreciated. .~ ' c rely, 7 . r %t ~ /~~ I ~~e L ng, P. E, -~` Consulting Enginee ~ ODL/ml 1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / ~!~"'~"?'!7"' Hurst, Texas 76053 /Phone 817 281-8121 ~ ,. ._,. r I• ~~ KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth-Dallas May 18, 1983 Planning & Zoni ng Commission City of North Richland Hi l i s 1301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hi 11 s, Texas 7 6118 Re: 3-817, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, LONSDALE ADDN., LOTS 8R, 9R AND IOR, PS 83-49, REPEAT, GRID 114 rev~i ewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the We have following comments: All util it com anies should be consulted regarding the proposed 1. y P replat, All ro ert corner mon~nentation should be noted on the plat. 2. p p y ' ommercial should be noted on the plat, 3. The ex~st~ng zoning ~c ~ _ 4. A smal 1 scale vicinity map should be added to the plat, 5. The existin fire hydrant on the west side of Davis Blvd, does not g l at area, We woul d rovide complete coverage of the proposed rep p be installed on the existing 12-inch suggest that a new fire hydrant water main located on the east side of Davis Blvd, as required to provide the necessary coverage. houl d ou have an ,questions concerning the review of this subdivision, s y y please do not hesitate to call. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/1 jc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad , Assistant Director of Public Works ~,,~ -ti. ,~. , . 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267.3367 4 • - ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE ~~119, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTID BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1961, AS AMENDED JANUARY 21, 1915 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-25 the following described property shall be rezoned from Planned Development, Agriculture, and Local Retail to Multi-Family, Planned Development, and Specific Use-Golf Course.. TRACTS 1 & 2 BEING a tract of land in Tarrant County, Texas out of the T. Aker, Survey, Abstract 19, and the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, and the R.P. Barton Survey, Abstract 115 and being more particularly described as follows: ,. BEGINNING at an iron rod for corner in the seuth line of Interstate-Loop 820 (350 foot R.O'~W.'~ and the east line of the St. Louis and Southwestern ,. Railroad (100 f oof'~ R.O.W.) ; THENCE North 89 degrees 03 minutes 51 seconds East along the south line of said Loop 820, a distance of 2595.31 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees lI minutes 09 seconds East leaving south line of said Loo 820, a distance of 254.82 feet to an iron rod for corner; said, P point lying on the north line of the TESCO easement (a 15-foot easement) as recorded in Volume 2868,. Page 449 of Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; ~t /~`''~, THENCE South 65 degrees 31 minutes 06 seconds West with the said north line of the TESCO easement, a distance of 390.93 feet to an iron rod for an angle point; ~~ THENCE South 71 degrees 58 minutes 01 seconds West with said north line of TESCO easement, a distance of 1808.9b feet to an iron rod for corner; said point being on a non-tangent curve to the right, said curve having a central angle of OS degrees 07 minutes 3b seconds, a radius of 1009.19 feet, a tangent length of 45.21 feet, and a tangent bearing of North 13 degrees 16 minutes 06 seconds East; THENCE along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 90.35 feet to the south line of the TESCO easement; ~. •- Page 2 THENCE South 71 degrees 58 minutes 07 seconds West a distance of 1141,44 feet along said south line of TESCO easement to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 02 degrees 27 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 41.54 feet to the centerline of said TESCO easement to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 42 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 255.49 feet to the south line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad; said point also being the beginning of anon-tangent curve to the left having a central angle of I6 degrees 25 minutes 51 seconds, a radius of 1102.95 feet, a chord bearing of North 38 degrees 57 minutes 51 seconds East, and a chord distance of 486.49 feet; THENCE in a northeasterly direction along the south line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad along said non-tangent curve to the left, an arc . distance of 488.36 feet town iron rod at the end of said curve; THENCE North 30 degrees 45 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 892.16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 53.8861 acres of land. TRACT 3 BEING a tract.of land in Tarrant County, Texas 'out of the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod for corner, said point being the northwest corner of Lot 49, Block I of the Meadow Lakes Addition, First. Filing, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills as recorded in Volume 388, Page 28 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said point also being the beginning of anon-tangent curve to the right, having a central angle of"08 degrees 49 minutes.55 seconds, a radius of t~09.79 feet, and a. chord bearing of South~~''22~~degrees 48 minutes 40 seconds West; ~.:,, ,r ,,,- THENCE in a southwesterly direction with said non-tangent curve to the right and with the west line of said Meadow Lakes Addition, First Filing, an arc distance of 155.66 feet to an iron rod at the end of curve; THENCE South 27 degrees 13 minutes 37 seconds West, with said east line of Meadow Lakes Addition, First Filing, a distance of 242.42 feet to an iron rod for a corner, said point being on the south R.O.W, line of Meadow Lakes Drive (an 80-foot R. 0. W.) ; THENCE South 62 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East with said south line of Meadow Lakes Drive, a distance of 129.93 feet to an iron rod, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 59 degrees 13 minutes 53 seconds, a radius of 1027.27 feet and a tangent length of 583.94 feet; THENCE in a northeasterly direction along said tangent curve to the left an arc distance of 1061.97 feet to an iron rod a~ the end of curve; THENCE South 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, leaving said south line of Meadow Lakes Drive and continuing with a westerly line of said Meadow Lakes Addition, First Filing, a distance of 436.63 feet to an iron rod for corner; .~~~ ,:, Page 3 THENCE South 65 degrees OS minutes 28 seconds West, leaving said westerly line of the Meadow Lakes Addition, First Filing, a~distance of 285.00 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 09 degrees 05 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 193..00 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 40 degrees 54 minutes 32 seconds East, a distance of 300.00 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 27 degrees 57 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 160.00 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 70 degrees 06 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 180.00 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 05 degrees 35 minutes 08 seconds East, a distance of 153.61 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 00 degrees 20 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 193.03 feet to an iron rod for angle point; said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 59 degrees 00 minutes 19 seconds, a radius of 60,00 feet, and a tangent length of 33.95 feet; THENCE in a northwesterly direction with said tangent curve to the left an arc distance of 61.79 feet to an iron rod at end of curve; THENCE North 58 degrees 43 minutes 04 seconds West, a distance of 26.33 feet to an iron; said point being the beginning of anon-tangent curve to- the right having a_central angle of 57 degrees 05 minutes 49 seconds., a radius of I75.OOfeet, a tangent length of 95.21 feet, a chord length of 167.27 feet, and `a-chord bearing South 59 degrees 28 minutes 36 seconds ~~ West; THENCE in a southwesterly direction along said non-tangent curve to the left an arc distance of 174.39 feet to an iron r-od- at end of said curve; THENCE South 88 degrees O1 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 606.93, feet to an iron rod, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 27 degrees 25 minutes 02 seconds, a radius of 200.00 feet, and a tangent length of 48.19 feet; THENCE in a southwesterly direction along said tangent curve to the left an arc distance of 95.10 feet to an iron rod at end of said curve; thence south 60 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 170.05 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 14 degrees 41 minutes 50 seconds West, a distance of 126..13 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 83 degrees 43 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 184.65 feet to an iron rod, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 28 degrees 58 minutes 41 seconds, a radius of 125.00 feet, and a tangent length of 32.30 feet; Page 4 THENCE in~a northwesterly direction along said tangent curve to the right an arc length of 63.22 feet to an iron rod, said point being the beginning - of a reverse curve with an central angle of 126 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds, a radius of 140.00 feet, and a tangent length of 276.17 feet; THENCE in a southwesterly direction along said reverse curve an arc distance of 308.45 feet to an iron rod at end of curve; THENCE South O1 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds West, a distance of 143.11 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 84 degrees 29 minutes 59 seconds West, a distance of 55.21 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 52 degrees 30 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 276.02 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 13 degrees 39 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 288.145 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 02 degrees 41 minutes 02 seconds East, a distance of 128.14 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 33 degrees OI minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 119.21 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 03 degrees 21 minutes 59 seconds East, a distance of 102.18 feet to an iron rod far angle point; Y. THENCE North 14 degrees 40 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 43.42 y feet to an iron rod~~~or angle point; t,ti~ ~ ;,• THENCE North 08 degrees 51 minutes 53 seconds West, a distance of 110.32 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 12 degrees OS minutes 41 seconds We~t~ a distance of 57.27 feet to an iron rod for angel point; THENCE North 02 degrees 27 minutes 46 .seconds East, a distance of 51.54 feet to an iron rod for angle point, said point also being on the south line of said TESCO easement; THENCE North 71 degrees 58 minutes O1 seconds East, with the south line of TESCO easement a distance of 1,141.44 feet to the POINT ,OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 41.7868 acres of land. TRACT 4 BEING a tract of land in Tarrant County, Texas out of the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron rod for corner, said point being the most northerly corner of Lot 53, Block 4 of the Fossil Creek Trails, First Filing as recorded in volume 387, Page 841, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 22 degrees 20 minutes 04 seconds West, a distance of 203.61 feet to an iron rod, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; r Page 5 THENCE North O1 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East, a distance of 143,11 feet to an iron rod, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 126 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds, a radius of 140.00 feet, and a tangent of 216.17 feet; THENCE in a northeasterly directi~ arc distance of 308.45 feet to an of a reverse curve with a central seconds, a radius of 125.00 feet, length of 62.55 feet, and a chord seconds East; ~n with said tangent iron rod, said poin angle of 28 degrees a tangent length of bearing of South 69 curve to the right an t being the beginning 58 minutes 47 32.30 feet, a chord degrees 14 minutes 34 THENCE in a southeasterly direction along said reverse curve an arc distance of 63.22 feet to an iron rod at end of curve; THENCE South 83 degrees 43 minutes 57 seconds East,, a distance of 184.65 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 14 degrees 41 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 126.13 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 60 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 110.05 feet to an iron rod, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the right with a central angle of 21 degrees 25 minutes 02 seconds, a radius of 200.00 feet, and a tangent length of 4$.79 feet; THENCE in a northeasterly direction along said tangent curve to the right an arc distance of 95.70 feet to an iron rod at the end of curve; >~ THENCE North 88 degrees Ol minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 606.93 feet to an iron rod;`~said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a`'~~central angle of 57 degrees 05 minutes 49 seconds, a radius of 175.00 feet, and a tangent length of 95.21 feet; THENCE in a northeasterly direction along said tangent curve to the left an arc distance of 174.39 feet to an iron rod at th-a--end of curve; THENCE South 58 degrees 43 minutes 04 seconds East, a distance of 26.33 . feet to an iron rod, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 59 degrees 00 minutes 19 seconds, a radius of 60.00 feet, a tangent length of 33.95 feet; THENCE in a southeasterly direction along said tangent curve to the right an arc distance of 61.79 feet to an iron rod at end of curve; .. thence south 00 degrees 20 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 169.03 feet to an iron for corner; THENCE South OS degrees 35 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 153.61 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 82 degrees 44 minutes 19 seconds West, a distance of 185.90 feet to an iron rod for angle point; Page 6 ~ " THENCE North 47 degrees 04 minutes 25 seconds West, a distance of 54.10 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 29 degrees 47 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 59.88 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 48 degrees 54 minutes 31 seconds West, a distance of 44.15 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 78 degrees 12 minutes 36 seconds West, a distance of 15.46 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 83 degrees 45 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 45.88 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 88 degrees 22 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 336.70 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 85 degrees 00 m~.nutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 60.25 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 76 degrees 33 minutes 17 seconds West, a distance of 24.02 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 47 degrees 47 minutes 43 seconds West, a distance of 27.28 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 15 degrees 26 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 29.36 feet to an iron rod for angle point; ~. THENCE South 04 degrees 52 minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of 83.93 f eet to an iron r`od ~ ~~f or angl"e point; "~ THENCE South 40 degrees 49 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 81.40 feet to an iron rod for angle point; __ THENCE South 8I degrees 56 minutes lb seconds West, a distance of 36.26 feet to'an iron rod for angle point; THENCE North 88 degrees feet to an iron rod for THENCE South 75 degrees f eet to an iron rod for THENCE South 89 degrees feet to an iron rod for THENCE North 45 degrees feet to an iron rod for THENCE North 84 degrees feet to the POINT OF BE+ 15 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 100.02 angle point; 40 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 97.02 angle point; 45 minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 241.00 angle point; 50 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 206.95 angle point; 29 minutes 59 seconds West, a distance of 120.14 GINNING and CONTAINING 8.6751 acres of land. '~ Page 7 NRH PORTION OF GOLF COURSE north of railroad) BEING a tract of land in Tarrant County, Texas out of the T. Akers Survey, Abstract 19, and the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin for corner ii 820 (a 350-foot R.O.W.), and the west and Southwestern Railroad (a 100-foot northeast corner of a 7.51 acre tract Inc. as recorded in Volume 7062, Page Texas; z the south line of Interstate Loop line, at this point of the St. Louis R.O.W.), said point being the conveyed to W. Brown Custom Builders, 1028, Deed Records of Tarrant County, THENCE South 30 degrees 45 minutes O1 seconds West, with the west line of said St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad, a distance of 830.43 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 13 degrees 20 minutes 32 seconds, a radius of 1602.95 feet, and a tangent length of 187.48 feet; THENCE in a southwesterly direction along said curve an arc distance of 373.27 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 00 degrees 39 minutes 24 seconds East, a distance of 953.60 feet to an iron rod in the south line of Interstate Loop 820; THENCE North 83 degrees 28 minutes 57 seconds East, with the south line of Loop 820, a distance of 289.76 feet to an iron rod for the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of ~05 degrees 33 minutes OS seconds, a rad.tus of 3643.22 feet, and a tangent length of 176.63 feet; THENCE in an easterly direction along said curve an arc distance of .352.9.9 feet to the POINT~"OF=BEGINNING and CONTAINING 7.5519 acres of land. .~,,., ,'` r ,~ NRH PORTION OF GOLF COURSE (south of railroad) BEING a tract of land in Tarrant County, Texas out of the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, and being more particular-ly-described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod for corner, said point being the northerly corner of Lot 53, 81ock 4 of the Fossil Creek Trails, First Filing as recorded in Volume 387, Page 847, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 27 degrees 06 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 406.83 feet to an iron rod for corner, said point being the southwest corner of Lot 3, Block 11, of the aforementioned Fossil Creek Trails, First Filing; THENCE South 89 degrees 16 minutes 21 seconds West, a distance of 503.30 feet to an iron rod for corner, said point being on the common boundary lines of North Richland Hills and, Haltom City; THENCE North 00 degrees 39 minutes 24 seconds East, with said common line a distance of 1539.20 feet to a point for corner, said point being in the south line of the TESCO easement as recorded in Volume 2868, Page 449, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Page 8 THENCE North 71 degrees 58 minutes 07 seconds East, leaving said common line and with said south line of TESCO easement, a distance of 192.35 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 02 degrees 27 minutes 46 seconds West, leaving south line of said TESCO easement, a distance of 51.54 feet to an iron rod for angle point; THENCE South 12 degrees 05 minutes 41 seconds East, a distance of 57.27 feet to an rod for an angle point; THENCE South 08 degrees 51 minutes 53 seconds East, a distance of 110.32 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 14 degrees 40 minutes 35 seconds West, a distance of 43.42 feet to an iron rod for an angle point; THENCE South 03 degrees 21 minutes 59 seconds West, a distance of 102.18 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 33 degrees O1 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 119.27 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 02 degrees 41 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 128.14 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 13 degrees feet to an iron rod for THENCE South 52 degrees feet to an iron rod '~f or -::~ .'r THENCE South 84 degrees feet to an iron rod for 39 minutes 02 seconds East, a distance of 288.14 corner; 30 minutes 26 seconds East., a distance of 27.6.02 corner; ,~. 29 minutes 59 seconds East, a distance of 175.36 corner; THENCE South 45 degrees 50 minutes 02 seconds Easty a distance of 206.95 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 45 minutes 44 seconds East, a distance of 241.00 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 75 degrees 40 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 91.02 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 88 degrees 51 minutes 15 seconds East, a distance of 100.02 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 81 degrees 56 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 36.26 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 44 degrees 08 minutes 51 seconds East, a distance of 50.11 feet to an iron rod for corner; l ~ ~ i• Page 9 THENCE South 00 degrees 43 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 55.65 feet to an iron rad for corner, said point being the northwest corner of Lot 45, Block 4 of .Fossil Creek Trails, First Filing as recorded in Volume 387, Page 841, Map Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 16 minutes 21 seconds West, with the north line of the aforementioned addition a distance of 536.40 feet to an iron rod for the beginning of curve to the right having a central angle of 21 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds, a radius of 343.34 feet, and a tangent length of 85.09 feet; THENCE in a westerly direction along said curve an arc distance of 166.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 15.9040 acres of land. This property is located on the south .side of Northeast Loop 820 and is bounded on the east by Meadow Lakes Addition and on the south by Fossil Creek Trails Addition. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 19th DAY OF MAY, 1983. CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - - :.- ..:, ~~,~~.. -- ~' SECRETARY PL ING AND ZONI G COMMISSIO BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY-0~ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE N0. PZ-83-25 IS HEREBY REZONED - THIS DAY OF ,1983. ATTEST; MAYOR JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY I • . ~'."" .. DATE; June 8, 1983 SUBJECT:. PZ 83-25 Re uest for Multi-Famil Planned Develo ent & S ecif is Use-Golf Cour~ on some Tracts in W.A. Trimble Survey, R.P.. Barton Survey, Abstract 1 ,and T. Akers Surve Abstract 19 DEPARTMENT : Plane in and Zoning BACKGROUI~~D: This ro ert is located on the south side of Northeast Loo 820 and is p ti~und~d on the east b Meadow Lakes Addition and on the south by Fossil Creek Trails Addition. There were several items discussed . There were b0 ro ert owners contacted. There have been several etitions submitted both for and against this request, see attached. The Plannin and Zonin Commission recommended approval of this zonin re nest sub' ect to ~ ~ ~ .__ ~s veral sti ulations b ~a vote of 3-1 with Mr . Bowen votin a ainst, See 'Attached minutes. w. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: A roval or denial of zonin re nest . ~_. BUDGETED ITEM: YES N0~ ACCOUNT NUMBER: NJA rfr~~r-~ ~rlrrrwrr--r~rrrrr~r~r r.rrrrrr ~r~rrr rrrrrrr~-rrr rr rrr rr-r-r-ter ~.~rr +..r .~.r~..+-r~r r~r ~.~rr~rr or-~. .~.~. .. ,. .. .. 0 1 i ~ ~ .., ., ~-, t CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PZ 83-25 i .MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS MAY 19, 1983 - 1:30 P.M. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, George Tucker, at 1:30 P.M. PRESENT CHAIRMAN George Tucker MEMBERS ~ Don Bowen Mark Wood Marjorie Nash Mark Hannon ALT. MEMBER John Schwinger ASST. DIR. PW/U Allen Bronstad CLERK Desi Smyth Mark Wood asked to be excused from this Commission meeting due a conflict of interest in this matter. The reason being he lives within 200 feet of this proposed rezoning., Request of W. Brown Custom Builders, Inc. to rezone some tracts Qf land in W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, • ~ R. P. Barton Survey, Abstract 175, and T. Akers Survey, Abstract 19, from their present classifications of Planned Development, Agriculture, and Local Retail to proposed classifications of Multi-Family, Planned Development, and.Specific Use-Golf Course. This property is located on the south side of Northeast Loop 820 and is bounded on the east by Meadow Lakes Addition and on the south by Fossil Creek Trails Addition. The Chairman opened the Pubic Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this zoning request to please come forward. Marion Massey, Attorney, came forward' to represent the developers of this request. He presented a conceptual plan of the proposed request. .~~~~ti.. .-, 5 ~ r 1 1 Page 2 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ , . . P & Z Minutes .. May I9, 1983 - - ~ Mr. Massey stated that there are two particular factors of concern the people of this area had. One being the golf course and the. other being the repair of the lake. Mr. Massey stated that the dam would have~to be repaired with the approval of the Texas Water Board. It would take about $150,000 to properly . fix the dam, channel beneath the dam clean out and dredge out the lake to get it back close to the level it was. He stated item ~~2 in priority is to alleviate traffic problems which will ultimately be a problem regardless how the land is developed, Mr. Massey stated that W. Brown Builders, Inc. got into the picture in 197. Ia 1914, Tracts I & 2 were zoned Local Retail. When Brown Builders came into the picture and until the present time, the owner ~~ :~ ._..; could have put apartments that are ~~~~~` .. - ... naw asked for in the present zoning. He stated that the zoning we are requesting is apartments at 19 units per acre, the apartments will decrease the traffic which would exist if the local retail shopping center went in by 1/3 or to say it another way, the apartments would create only 1/3 the traffic that a shopping center would. Mr. Massey stated that they had contacted the State Highway Department and .had a letter from Mr.~ French, . District Design Engineer, which suggests that we propose to the City of North Richland Hills that we construct a street which we will call Colonial Drive up to the existing bridge that is up on Loop 820, east of the railroad crossing. He stated this would give direct access to Loop 820 eastbound. It ' would be a one way horseshoe ~ ~ r 3 . ,! (~ 1 Page 3 (~ P & Z Minutes ~~. May 19, - 1983 l turnaround that would take traffic to the west very similar to what you see under most interstate highways. Mr. Massey presented a diagram of how the turnaround would take traffic back to the west. Chairman Tucker stated that traffic coming from the west could skip taking the Rufe Snow exit by coming up over the bridge going into the subdivision. Mr. Massey stated that although the apartments would create some traffic the new street would dictate a convenience for a number of people coming in and out of the subdivision. He stated that the next item of concern was the golf course which 2/3 if not 3/4 was actually in the f load plain and in Haltom, City. Most of which is in the City of North Richland Hills is actually useable property that the developer is giving up for _a good buffer zone. _ Mr. Massey stated that the conceptual plan here tonight has some adjustments from the previous plan. He stated that many probably felt that how do we know the developers are going to do what they say they are going to do. Mr. Massey then stated that they wanted to be tied~to the commitments that item ~~1, the dam would be con- structed first and foremost and/or the money be put up in escrow with the City. Secondly, item ~~2, the bridge would be built or the money put up with the City of North Richland Hills'or the State of Texas, whichever depository is represented, and obviously when we put our money up that~s about all they can do ,dealing with the State of Texas. 1 Page 4 P & Z Minutes "~ May 19, 1983 ~. _... i i . - • ~, " Mr. Massey stated that thirdly, the golf course is ready to go, however, we will have the developers put up a performance bond. He stated that these three things will be done first before any construction begins. He also wanted to emphasis that it would be about six years before all of this is completed. Mr. Massey stated that they did have a deadline of June 30th to have an acceptable plan or Continential Bank will take over the mortgage. He presented the Commission with the letter from Mr, French and a petition for the request with 49 names on it with 28 names within 200 feet. Chairman Tucker asked who the developer is and who will be the developer on all tracts, or if the is zoned the way it is requested, will the tracts be split up and _ sold of f to other developers, Mr. Massey stated that he could only tell him what the immediate plans are. Except for the golf course, Brown Builders plan to develop the residential lots and their plan is to build and develop the condominiums. He stated that if someone comes up and says they are going to take it off our hands and do the same thing, I could only speak as if I was the developer, and if I could get close to the same return without the. headaches, then I would probably sell the property. But we want whatever restrictions you feel are necessary or warranted in order that whoever would take this over would be required to do the same thing as we are. Mr. Massey stated that it would nog. be a low rent district when you consider the land cost and the developers cost. They have to get a .~ ~~ ,~.. • Y A ~~i Page~S ~ ~ ~ ,; ,, P ~ Z Minutes May 19, 1983 high return on these apartments, rent wise. Mr. Hannon stated that his main concern was the traffic in this area. It appears that the solution is to build an access road on the south, as well as bridges over the railroad to the west & on and off ramps at that location. Mr. Hannon asked if his client ~' would be willing to construct these or agree to contract with the City to have the State construct these. Mr. Massey stated no because they have looked into this and the cost of extending that railroad bridge is so phenomenal that the State Highway Department said there is no plan nor will there ever be any for that to be done. He then asked if it was the service road where it goes th ru that was being discussed. Mr. Hannon stated that lie considered _this to be a potentially hazardous situation having to come down on the freeway. Mr. Massey stated that their engineer said there was no way and so did the State Highway Dept. As far as the potential traffic hazard, it is my understanding that the State Highway . Dept. designed this and the fact is this is the required distances and they considered this to be non-hazardous. Chairman Tucker asked how do you assure the City and how do you give the Commission and City Council the chance to really approve your plan as Planned Development. You have a conceptual plan, but according to ordinance, it does not meet the ' ordinance as it is written today on the submission of this plan. He stated that the ordinance states that we want to know where the buildings are going within . ~.' ~\` ~ Page 6 P & Z Minutes May I9, 1983 ..._ ._ ~.,~~, ,, ~• i ..: ,. limitations of construction, where are the parking lots, what is the parking ratio, where are the green areas going to be and what is the real density going to be. When you say a conneptual plan that means it is subject to some pretty good changes when you get into same engineering problems. Mr. Gene Worrell, Engineer for the developers, stated that on projects of this magnitude and after reviewing your ordinance on planned development, the detailed requirement on planned development approval is substantial more than what we have presented to the Commission and Staff. In discussion with the Staff, we asked if we could submit a planned development district request and establish the criteria in accordance with your zoning ordinance and provide in that planned development district ordinance, that prior to issuance c any building permits, detailed site plans would be submitted and approved by the Commission and City Council before a f final subdivision plat could be filed. He stated that it is our feeling that by using the criteria established in your subdivision ordinance as this property is developed under and provided further in the PD ordinance the final site plan would have to be approved before the issuance of any building permits,thereby assuring that these plans are in conformance with the conceptual plan. This would give the City the final review of the product before it is ever approved. Chairman Tucker stated that in normal circumstances in zoning you have to give a site plan anyway. It is unusual on the PD portion because actually you are asking for a zoni change then going through the normal` zoning channels. You use the word PD and I am wondering why you use it. ,` c ~. ~.- ~. ~.. Page 7 ~ C P & Z Minutes May 19, 1983 Mr. Massey stated that they have four that if you say planned development, that most the time those who under- stand zoning feel more comfortable that the City has a better ax over th developer to see that he does what h~ says hers going to do. In a mere zoning change you can do anything required in that zoning. We under- stand that the people want to know t' whole project and frankly, it is so huge that we wanted the PD so there would be a last~say in what we would have to put in. Chairman Tucker stated that what Mr. Massey was stating is that the City can tie them to a schedule. Mr, Worrell stated that what they we trying to do is assure you that we are going to do what we say. If we are tied to a schedule and if we don meet that schedule then the zoning would be null and void. Mr. Jack Mayberry, b405 Riviera, cap forward. He stated that he built tr.: first house in Meadow Lakes in 1971 and he is president of the associate that was formed to save the lake, bu~ tonight he is speaking for himself a not the association. He stated that he, agreed with Mr. Massey in effect that the lake needs to be fixed. He can't see why anyone would want to live out here a not get some benefit out of it . If the lake is not fixed then it will an open storm sewer by this time ne year. Mr. Mayberry stated that being a CP he is very familiar with builder's costs, profit motives, and developi and if anybody in the audience thin tho` phase will ever be developed l a~;~ single family homes similar to the homes in Meadow Lakes, then he would like to sell them some urani stock. ,y. ~•K~ ~.. _ , Page 8 P & Z Minutes May 19, 1983 . . ... ~~. ~/ ~. He stated the lots would be just tc,_ expensive to sell and there is no way you could develop that into all single family homes. If this fails to pass then it will be a long time before we see anyone else develop this area. Mr. Mayberry stated that if this request is turned down the residents may see a worse plan several years from now. He stated that he thinks this is the best deal for the area. Mr. Richard Gallaher, 4809 Woodcreek, came forward. He stated that he was an officer of the Meadow Lakes Assoc. and that they had been working for a~ year trying to get the concept that the only alternative fs apartments in the entire area and in the year it has developed into the plan you see here. We as residents of this area ~~requested that the developer include everything you see on the plan here as planned development. We did nc want the proposal that was brought co you several weeks ago Where the _apartment area was straight apartment Zoning. Our fear was that the land would be sold off and none of the other things would happen. As a total plan the majority of the people and Meadow Lakes Assoc. are prepared to accept this concept. Mr. Hannon asked if he was speaking .for the homeowner association. Mr. Gallagher replied yes. He was speaking for lb members of the assoc. Mr. Bill Fenimore, b041 Riviera, came forward. He stated he was in favor of this request because they are providing for another way out of the area at their cost. They are planning to construct a bridge which is totally unbelievable to me as a developer. He also sta*~d that apartments are a lot better than a shopping center or mall. ,a ~.., ~ u ~~- Page 9 P ~ Z Minutes May 19, 1983 ~,, Mr. Bert McDaniel, 6409 Meadow Lakes Drive, came forward. He stated he was neither for or against but had a question about the turnaround. Mr~. McDaniel asked how many lanes it would be, right now the left turn lanes back up greatly on the access road. Mr. Worrell stated that it would be an additional left turn lane and widened. Mr. McDaniel asked how the residents who don't live on the lake were suspose to have access to it. Mr. Worrell stated the developer has reserved a lot to provide an access. They were not sure if it would be private or public access. Mr. David Reasor,.6545 Lakeside Circle, came forward. He stated his main concern was the condition of the lake. It is literally turning into a swamp. This is the best plan that has been offered this area Mr. T. D. Horton, 3805 Diamond Loch came forward. He stated that he is opposed to this because of the traffic. He did hope that they coul work out a compromise. Chairman Tucker stated that the Comm fission and the City Council could place many restrictions on this project. We can see that any stipulation is carried out before any building permits are issued. The Chairman called for those wishin to speak in opposition of this reque to please come forward. Mr. Charles Herndon, 5000 Skylark, came forward. He stated that he was opposed to this because of the traffic that would be generated from tracts 1 & 2. The increase would be approximately 2800 cars and people. Mr. Herndon stated he wanted single family there. ti.' ,'1.... _ . . .~ ~, r ..: .. .~:. ;-:, ~. ~,• Page 10 P & Z Minutes May 19, 1983 (rte I ~ ~~ RECESS BACK TO ORDER Mr. Frank Metts, 5002 Skylark, came forward. He stated that he agreed with Mr. Herndon and ~~ that this was not a satisfactory plan to him. He presented the Commission with a petition of 104 signatures representing 3b homes within 200 feet and b8 homes not within Z00 feet. ~ ' Mr. Judd Brock, 4904 Lariat, came forward. He stated his main objection is the traffic problem that would be created. Chairman Tucker called a recess at 9:05 P.M. Chairman Tucker called the meeting back to order at 9:25 P.M. with the same members present. Mr. Gary Neisler, b21b Riviera, came forward. He stated that he live within 200 feet but did not receive a letter notifying him of the meeting. Mr. Neisler stated he was-concerned about the traffic. He stated he would like to see the property south of the power lines be single family. Mr. Dale MaZachek, 4913 Dory, came forward. He stated he was opposed to this because of the increase in density. He also stated that as a matter of clarification the Meadow Lakes Association never had a formal meeting. Several other homeowners came forward and stated that their main objection was because of the traffic. There being no one else wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Tucker stated he was aware there wasn't more time to fully plan this development but that was one reason why they postponed it. 3 r ~' ~ r . ~.. \r ~ ~ . Page 11 . P & Z Minutes May 19, 1983 1 '. 1~ r~ He stated that this land will never be single family residences. It will be some type of commercial or maybe multi-family with business park mixture. Mr. Hannon asked who the developer was on the golf course. !~ Mr. Johnny Pelcher stated Mr. Jim Redford is the architect and the engineer on site of construction is Jim Turf . Mr. Hannon stated he would like to say that this may be the last chance to fix the lakes. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PZ 83-25 subject to the following stipulations. 1. The developer put in escrow with the City the estimated cost of the left turn bridge across 820 and agree to reimburse the City for any additional cost over and above the original estimate, 2. They put. in escrow with the City the estimated cost of constructing an excess road on the south side of 820 and agree to reimburse the City for any additional cost over and above the estimate. 3. They complete construction of the lakes prior to issuance of ,building permits. 4. They have executed with contractor a contract for construction of the golf course and appropriate performance bond to ensure its construction prior to issuing of building permits. 5. All areas east of Colonial and south of Meadow Lakes be single family in conformance with our existing ordinance for 1F-12. That green space be provided between the upper and lower lakes to be a park benefited by all the people not living on the lake and this open space be a minimum of five acres. That individual site plans of development sites be approved by this Commission prior to issuance of building permits. That a 6' masonry wall be constructed on the north line of TESCO easement and 150` south of TESCO easement, the apartments be limited to one story. ~•.~ ~~~ i ~ '• Page 12 ~ '~ ., ( . P &_ Z Minutes May 19, 1983 ,, ~ ~ Finally, City Council amend the ~; PD ordinance to allow the approval - ~ ~ • • of this zoning, if required. . This motion was seconded by Mrs. Nash, and the motion carried 3-~ with Mr. Bowen voting against. ~~ ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10;10 P.M. .., ' L ~.L.~r~{ ~.;.,4.I V~. 1'~ti I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS APRIL 28, 1983 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order by t Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:3$ P PRESENT CHAIRMAN MEMBERS ALT , MEMBER ASST. DIR. PW~~' P & Z COORD~~ATOR I~ Georg ucker D o ~' owen Mark Wood John Schwinger Allen Bronstad Wanda Calvert ABS EN~~ ~ Marjorie Nash ., ;,~' Mark Hannan ~~ %/ • .~ i/ CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES ~,.%~ Mr. Schwinger made the motion to OF SPECIAL MEETING OF ,~ approve the minutes as written. MARCH 21, 1983 ;f~, This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood ,~ ,,;.~~' and the motion carried 4-0. , .. :; t ,;. CONSIDERATION OF THE~'fi~INUTES Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve OF MARCH 24, 1983:~~ minutes as written. This motion was '~'~ seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion ~. ~ - .~~'~~ ~ carried 4-0. l /~ 8. PZ 83-25 Mr. Bowen made a motion to move item ~t8, PZ 83-25, to the top of the agenda. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger, and the motion carried 4-0. Request of W. Brown Custom Builders, Inc. to rezone some tracts in W.A. Trimble Survey,. Abstract 1520, R.P. Barton Survey, Abstract I15, and T. Akers Survey, Abstract 19, from their present classifications of Planned Development, Agr~.culture, and Local Retail to proposed classifications of Multi-Family, Planned Development, and Specific Use-Golf Course. This propert~• is located on the south side of Northeast Laap 820 and is bounded on the east by Meadow Lakes Addition and on the south by Fossil Creek Trails Addition. Page 2 P & Z Minutes April 28, 1983 PZ 83-25 POSTPONED 1. PS 83-34 c Mr. Bowen.made,the motion to postpone PZ 83-25 until May 19, 1983 at 7:30 P.M. since, at present, the Commission does not have enough information to approve the request, they would have no choice but to deny this request. He said the developer has requested it be postponed to give him time to provide the Commission with the information needed. Chairman Tucker said the Commission would like to have a minimum of two workshops regarding this matter and the citizens are welcome to attend. He said the way the plan is now, the density is slightly high, the traffic problem is horrendous. Chairman Tucker said the developer has been working with the State Highway Department to see if there can be anything done on 820 to eliminate some of this problem, and the developer has stated some willingness to change the density. Chairman Tucker said the ' Commission feels it is only f air to postpone this request until May 19th, but said the Commission solicit the citizen's input; this is a Planned Development and should be planned to be a benefit to the city instead of a detriment. Mr. Schwinger seconded the motion and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Tucker stated this case will be heard on May 19, 1983 at 7:30 P. M. .and there will be no further notifications, but you can call Mrs. Calvert as to when the workshops will be held. Request of Northeast Construct' Company for replat of Lo~~, thru 23B, Block 26, and ~, . t~s~`~8A thru 17B, Block 33, Ho ay~West Addition, .}~- Secti~>y . ~"`~ Chairman Tucker said since this is a replat in duplex zoning, they must hold a Public Hearing. He opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this req~e;~,t: to please come forward. i• TO:, City Council City of North Richland Hi 11 s _ g_ g'3 ~-~--- :~, ~ Date: ~~ Case No: ~~ We, the undersigned residents and/or property owners of North Richland Hills ~.~ within 200 feet~of subject property), hereby object to the rezaing of said tract for the following reason(s): this rezoning would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity or general welfare of~the gresent neighborhood. Signature: Date:. Address: C~L , ~ ~ 83 C~ i i Z ,~: .~~ ~~ .~ ~~ G ~~ ~'~ ~ ~~ r~ "' T0:. City Counci 1 City of North Richland Hi 11s ~ _ ' q e,"~' ~Go Date: _ ~ 7 ~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ Case No: ~ Z g.3 -~-5 We, the undersigned residents andjor property owners of North Richland Hiils ~' .~ within 200 f eet of subject property } , hereby object to the rezo~i n of 9 said tract for the fol i owi ng reason (s } :_ this rezoning would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity or general welfare of~the present neighborhood. ~ ~ . Signature: Date~:~- °`~ ~~~' ~~~ y /,r=te i Address: ~~J z~~~ Sv~o~Z~. 7G/i8 ~19i3 ~~.~~i~a' ~ft~:aiss ,~-o~Y s , Cf~ =X98-as3r ~ GAG /7i7 '` .ry ~~mi.~ ~~~//~~~- moo} .I,~~ ~~ ~'`~,-, _,~.,. ~. n ; . ~ , ,_ . , ~; ~: ~,~e~ ~~ ~~~ ~z ~ ff ~!_.._ ~ l ~ '' ~ . ~ -~ ~ j ~ ., .. ~ ~ .,~.~ .s-~ y-ib-s d' ao~5 xa--G_G- evo . i~v ~ - /G -~3 ~-iG ~~ ~- ~~ - ~3- ~ ~G ~ S-~ ~-~~- ~~ SDI; ~ SSG-1~' l~u.t;,)~:~ Sb~Y c~~-~,i.~.~.~,--G~-~-~- ,~GD l ~~ ~~-L ~ ~ _.,, 1 .~ ~ ~ ;, .. S ~~ ~~a-v ., . ~,~ -, . i C~~ - ~:3, ~~. , /- ~~ _. . f0:. City Cou nc i i City of North Richland Nilis i• Date: ~ ~7-~~ .. _ ..._. / ~ o-a ~~. ,~~c Case No: Z. ~3 ~a2 We, the undersigned residents and/or property owners of hlorth Richland Hi 11 s ~~~ .~ within 200 feet of subject property} , hereby object to the rezo~ ng of said tract for the fol 1 owi ng reason ~s } : this rezoning would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity or penera~ welfare of ~ the present neighborhood . Signature: Date:. ¢~~--~~1 ~ Address: .. ~r~, i~ ~1 ~~~_~~ ~ G~~ ~ ~~~~~ o ~ ~ /~ _ y~3 yyg ,as° ~a i7 i ~. ~ ~ ~ A~ ~, ; ~Ci ,~~. ~~.~ ,- ~ `t ~l g /8~ ~ q 8 -a 18 / 5c~ e-V~ C-~ '//~K/.~J LC l5L~~0O ? CD ~GJ /i(FGJiitU/-oh.:~ w ~~ . ' r T0:. City Council Date: - ~ ? -- ~ City of North Richland Hi11s '~~ ~ ~ - _ • Case No: ~z- ~ 3_ ~S~ ~--,. We, the undersigned residents andJor property owners of North Richland Hi11s .E within 200 feet of subject ro ert hereb ob 'ect tot ' p p y}~ y ~ he rezo~ng of say d tract for the foi i owing reason (s ~ : this reZOni n would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience comfort ros eri t or eneral w lfare of ~~the fires ent ne i ghborhoad . ~ . Signature: Date: Address: ~- /~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ / ~ ~~ ~ p ~ ~ ,I ~~ 3 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ r ~~ 1 ~~ `~ - , ~ ~_3 ~ • ,~ l ~ ~ ~ d J ~ ,, ~ - ,~- `~ ~/ b ~ , F j ;~=. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ .. .. .^ L ~~ '~ l l 1/ j I I~ ~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ., ,~~~ ~ . ~, ~~ ~- - ~ ~ ~ l~ . ,~ nk • r r ' ~' J ~ r ) / ~~ ~.J I i / ,~~ r /~ V ' Lim \~~J// .. ' ~ , / ~ r ~ Y / / ~/'~ 'r •• ~K ~ ,. ~ `;. ,~ti~ ,.. .. . ~,~~,~~ • TO:. City Council . City of North Richland Hills Date: -~~-~~ .~, Case No: ~ ~ ~3,~~ . We, the undersigned residents andjor property owners of North Richland Hills (not within 20o feet of subject property}, hereby object to the rezoin of 9 say d tract for the fol 1 owi ng reason (s } : th ~ s rezone n would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience comfort rosperit or ______. ~ p v genera 1 welfare of the present neighborhood. Signature: Date: ~?-~~~ Yale-~~ ~-~~-g3 ~ ~ ~ ~i~-~ ~ ,~w ,~~.~~ _ .~-~~-sue ~~ ~~ ~~~~~- /~ ., ~~ `_a ~, Address: <S(i60 pAK~= /iiEUJ LiR~ 599- lS6 7 S D to O ~~~ ~/ce c1r ~ ' ~.. 577-/567 \~ So >. ~,~r~ ~~~w~ o ~oa r+ V • f ~ C,~~~ I W, ~.1' ~ ~.~1~l~1 ,_ ,~, L ~ ~~-~. ~t~a ~a Jb' - ~-a~- a~ ~~~5 `7~"~C~ Cam. ,,~ ~rt . . . '~ r e TO:. City Counci 1 City of North Richland Hills ~. ... .w . ~~..\rY.i~lJ V~YM71. fir. ~• ..- ~ . ,' .. / ~ /. ~~ S Date: Case No: We, the undersigned residents and/or ro ert owners of North Richlan ' P P y .~ H~ l is (not w~th~n 200 feet of subject pro ert hereb ob ect to the re P y } ~ , y ~ zoo ng of sa ~ d tract for the following reason (s } : th ~ s rezoni n would not be c 9 onduct~ve o the public safety, health, convenience comfort rosperi t or eneral w lfare of the oresent neighborhood. Signature: Date: Address: ~~.S~~T ~~.e~~ S- 5-8 3 4BoY /~e~._~{ 6s6 - z 2 ~ 9.. ~ j~ S/S~ 8 3 r ~~~~r~ ~/s~~3 L 5/s~ ~3 ~ /s/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /8/ 8 3 ~ ,~~.w ~l ~l~a ' %~~3 `~ ~ ~~~~~ ~'l; ~~"c~.J 5~~~83 D . i~av~-~- S- i? • v 3 ~ 75~ ~y -iy- 93 Z8/-5~~7 ~~~_6~~~ z8i~39'o/ ~ 9~-3 Ya/ ~ c ~• 6~~~ << Soo bo~.~oE2Cr 48Sy~Z ~Soa Gf- f~,S-sy-z3 DSO S~ ~^~Qa-~. ~• ~fs = i~~ z] 6 spy .l~~c~~C~ yP's -ysa, G So / i. ~~5. ~67~ ~-gs =9~w~ `~~~~ ~uven ~i~ ~9~ E~ 1.5~~- ~-KkeSide 653„ ~szi Vp~~ Hof ~ ~cc~ ~,~ ~; d ~ ~Q~`E s;de L a~./~ ~ .s: d e ~YIi- ~_~ S- ~~ T0: , City Counci 1 City of North Richland Hi ] 1 s . . Date: ~f !~j ~~ % ~ c~ We, the undersigned residents andjor ro erty owners of North Richla ' P P nc~ N~ 11 s {not w~.th ~ n 200 feet of subJ ect pro ert ) , hereb ob 'ect to th ' P y y. J e rez~ng of sa ~ d tract for the fo11 owe ng reason (s) : this rezone n would not be ~~ c~n~uctive to the public safety, heath, convenience comfort ros L p pe r~ ty or Qenera 1 welfare of the uresen~ nee hborhood, Signa/t~ure: k ~~,~ ~ ~ . L.-~ ~ .. , - Cam) /f~ ~ ~C~3 Date: ~~ {~~y~3 Case No: A~e~ress~: Sa`y' ~ ~~c~ /'1 ~S~ i5~3 CT /i~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~-~ ~aC ~ -1ch~LC~~ ~, r ~ ~ ~., - ~ S J GG , 1, ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ 1 ~~ _ ~ ~. l , ~~ , rat ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~/' f ,. ~, ~~ ~ ; (~ ~~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ T . (. ~ i < - ;~ V , ~ ~ l ~~ .~~zL~c~. l ~3 /~ ~ .._., ;?' -1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ; ~ •. , r. ' I 1• ~ , tr ~v . ,. 7C~: , ~i ty Ct~une ~ ! • • Ci ~~ of ~~~or~h Ri chi and Hi 11 s , ~• S } ~ j ._ .. . , ~" V ~rosp,, ~ nei ~~~i~or~~oc~d. '• 'r,J~~' }, -.~.r~,... S . .~,..... / ,' ~.Y 1IV.. ~~+ f1~ J( //(J / .~' .~/~ ^11./1 • } ~ ..Y ~ ~ ~ /1/////~ //} / ~ , .•..,.. ~...~~ YII . M..J ~G.'IMf~~A~rM~.Ur V ~, •.. V..K'.`~.MV~Yt~iT.lir~•yrr ! '/ ! ~ ~j J ~j+ /w/7 J(% .{~.' r1.YI1~ Y~Yy1lN~rr..rM~Y•r11•M~~ ~~ ~~~ / ~~,/~/,~~`~ // • ~r1~lVw..IY.N (~.L ~'hJ /F ~~ ~ a~ wi Afwyvnr n • ~ / ~ G/ r r.~.w.r"'u`'~+a+rruYS rr . +swr JY ,` ~~ ~ ~ • !Ji] ~ ` •w*wrrs~.rwrwY„r„ .u-w rwwMr ~ ` ~ ~~ m~w..ri,.,s.. ~~ ~ '.'.w...r...rw..w~~•. w+~.nn .....~ r-.7+..i,...nrr„w,,,u,,,,rv,r,r..,..,..re.~,•~..sw•,,. ...~v.~........,.~•vRVVV...»~,K;r"'ti'i .C. ~' , C ( ...~... w...... .~"........sY..,,Y,....,.,,,~,,........~..4..,.r,,•. ~ ~ ~"~` ~ r ~ ~~~_~1' 1...w•. r.,•. r+ nw .;1 ~~ ~~ / ~~ ~~Y~ ~ ~ f~ ~ 1 + ~ ~ ` J ~ r ~ ~ w•'•".++..~.ue+~u^w..~w ^1..1.~ ~w•1r. owr r~~•~~+~• ~ t ~~ V ~~~ ` t L" _ ~+ar.r.vr*.~-.~"r"'u"Y+,r+•...+rJC.,,rrrrr~we_c ..n,ry • 1 ~.~1••1ti.Ir W..N •. ~11•.~.-./M:.A.y M.•YII rA.I ~' ~ f ~~ .~'r••Ii:•rl••~..1 Lrlyy,0~ . / Y ~ rar '•V V ~wr •.~snrw ~ ` •~ ` ~ ~~.A~7~~ ~ ~1~r~~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ • 1 ~ 1` ~ ta"..'r'1R n.MVC. \~L.~ ~~ ~ ! r ~~ ~ ~ I .+~.ti14.M~-t~M.tw .~, ~...• M.;.~ •.1t ~~~I; ~ 1 ~ .... _ ~ '~'~'~~Y ' Y w . ....Y,r y.,rv'r...w.tw•e.~ ++'+srrr a1w.. 1... ~~.~r+~•rowtr•rrt..w.nyrw ~. ~. N.~.v.~..wr..~_._ -_ r.• . . ~.r r~ti~.l~wrr... r.a.1+..rw.en.w.~.~ a..+e.a .w :.....wyi.~wa ~r... i.. rn...~wetirr.Ya.w~ MR1.W..~..~.`/ 1 ` ..w.~'.+MM ~Y.M.I....Y....:sti1r~.~Y~.M~ar.~.l.1 V...~1.~~\M.M..Y~.ir.~1..R rail.Mr~fa~~...rYr1~.~~w.yry~'~•'.r.•..r.wY.../.~ .r~N~M.~F1+~~'~1 M•~...•t y~} i.M.....~r ..+r ~.~wr..Q+y'f. A.1+ss..•rrir... •~..y. •~.y, Y...'. MAYi. ~~w1• •r~•.....•.eY.V..r ~_ ~'~"~+.~..Ya'Y.Ir\..Vr.i . +r. r Mr ~..'~.,...1..•r'r y.~.~1 M 4•-.~r Ny. f. t~~ tV ! rr w.yrww ~rrY'~r+•rv r~r.r~Y wa.•-..w.w..r.~..r.w~yy~ 1~ 7~~M w.4.1V M... .M~.9.V1Yr .r~- ~/.. ~.r.r~/.r.A.rMM~'WY.r R}S.•.~..~w~ •1~A J s1 1..,..,.. ... b•...a.I~..~y~~~ '. ~N~r'r'~..~r~ ~YV.-,Y~I.,w..~.... irrn.~'wW.w~.~.wir.Mr• J~-l~ra~ ~.~r w~.•.-~11~1.M~V M... ti.r {.^.• •.~+y~..•w..~.y{. w•+M ~~^~M~'4'n'.n`h.rnWr.. - ~+...wrr...^••- ` ~Y^'~'1+.+Y+!. +--' ' ..s...vf.~. •r, ey.~,y...~y.~~ f`f`1 f yr'rY~r•.r.~+~.~w....w.~..r~..wrrr....~ur, ~.w.r.r..w~.~•~y.' ~.. rr..w ! J "°'u'.r.r.~.. ....wwis. '."~'."~+..~.+..r~. wr. ~. w~ra e.n.....w. ~..+vs . w. +w•.r. w..r~ .~-..r~...1,.~.. qY............+r w rwrr,tir •'+~.. y~ ..tinw.y ~+r..r......,.,....srs X1'11.11... .w ~. r.. .. wr llll •.w.A...wr/\U ' ~TNY^4AY.+r~Y.rr 1rM•~.1.1~~'~sW~.•+worn.Ikr•~~~A•..yr:...r.w.1.1.+1Y~7w..l l1~y~~~~u. I. rr .. ~". ......~N'1111111riy w .w. 1.w.v. ... "Air~lr.~yya+:~ ~ •~.....Y.."~, s..rr~rvu. w..r w ~..-.....r...+r.Y....r......+..w •.w-r..w..~.r.Y....r Y ...... , •...,..r...~... r .. ~+....•.1.•.+.....~., .......,,~,,,,. ~...~ •"1V ••..wy~.. v . 5 • a ••M+1.../11Y..1 ~. ~.7t~...-r.. ~ w ~,.~~1'...y.rY •MI ~••r.Y rr.~l.•~Y.•~.m111w.r r.r raw r. ~.•. .w M .rte 'r++.+•.w1..w.r .n.r~ ~ ~.rr.M...M .... l f ~fr~.r•+~YMw' '~M.ns.~~. •..1..•,ry, .+wrf-~- ~ .w.Yrr.wr.w~r+.~..+..+w .......~.+r..rw~ey_. ~.. '.l «~ r..... ,~,, w .~ n w w.~ar ~'r.wwlw+.1 ....-r r.,.r,.rrti M.wrrw.-.. t~c~`~ • ~ '~~~r~ '`1~~` -~ ~.L, ~ / ~ Case ~~o: _.... _....,..: _. _... w _ ... ~ .... . 1t'es i'~~~ u-~dersiy-,ed rts~den~s a,r-c~;'Gr p;~~oporty r~,~~~;~e; c~i' t•~c.-ri.h R;c~~1ar~~} '1~ ~•. ~ .~ , ~n1 r~ ?1.~C feet ~ ~ su~,~ecf: ~z•o~ert~~, , h~re~~w~, o~,.~ec~ fo t~~e +,~zc~ r~ ;~ r sL ~ : ~r~ot far' the ~~a i 1 c~~ri rg .reason f,s) : ~:h i s re ton t n?~ .,,r,~,u i ~ nub ~ ~ r ,n.~ !~r •~ ~. w.+w ~..~ ..rte.! ! ~ `~~y' __.. ~~ ~ ~ l ; s ~ ~..y s ~ o , e rl , Q n c e ,. c o ~~ ; o r ~ qq '}'~f ' ~ t{/r ~ / ` (~ 'yJ ~.. ~..~. «~.... r. r. ~w ~.••~~+. .•.w..Y .w. ..ww........ ..IL,~....r .~..~-.r......' 'J ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 1., ~'',• b....~..~, {' 1 }~~!1! - I ~ r l,' nn ~_ , V~ ti}V .A r, ~ T0:. City count i 1 City of North Ric ' hl and H~ l is ~. ,k 1 ~; f t Date Case No: We, the undersigned residen is andjor propert owner • (not w~ the n 200 feet of ~ s of North R~ chla subject propert hereb nd Hills said tract fort y} ~ y object to th he following reasons a rezo~ng of (~ . this rezon ~ n would not be conduct•• to the public safet hea ~Ve Y~ lth, convenience comfort ros eri t or of the oresent nei ahhnrti,~„a enera1 w 1 f are Signature: Date: L~ Cie . ~<<. l~ i `~ , r~~ i. Address: J ~ ` ~~ ` ~ ~~~ `~ ,` M A ~'. ~a ~~ 5 l+ i• ~•'~ THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS R E T R A C T I O N We, the undersigned, being the property owners living within 200 feet of the property sought to be re-zoned, hereby notify the Plannin ~ Zonin 8 g Commission and the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills that we wish to remove our signatures from any and all petitions opposing the a li- PP cation for re-zoning identified as PZ 83-25 heard before the Plannin ~ Zonin g g Commission of the City of North Richland Hills on May 20, 1983, and b this y instrument and our signature do hereby give notice that we no longer o ose PP such zoning application of W. BROWN CUSTOM BUILDERS, INC. ~~~~ ~~ . !~ .~_ S THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS R E T R A C T I O N We, the undersigned, being the property owners livin within 2 g 00 feet of the property sought to be re-zoned her ~' eby notify the Planning ~ Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of North Richland Hil is that we wish to remove our signatures from any and all etitions o o P pp sing the appli- cation for re-zoning identified as PZ 83-25 heard before the Pl anning ~ Zoning Coinrnission of the City of North Richland Hills on Ma 20 1983 and Y ~ by this instrument and our signature do hereby give notice that we no longer oppose such zoning application of W, BROWN CUSTOM BUILDERS, INC. //~ /d~~ ~305~ ~' R TQ; City Council DATE; City of North Richland Hills TI~+iE: CASE NO , PZ S 3 - 2 5 U/~/~ n~ ~~ We, the undersigned reside,~ts and/or property owners in North Richland Hills not within 200 feet o~f the subject ro ert herP- P P Y by approve the rezoning of the said tract for the followin reasons: g This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, ros- P perity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE: DATE: ADDRE SS• • • I~ •~d ~~ •~! ~, y . ~"~- `~ TQ: City Council DATE; ______. city of North Richland Hills TI~-+~; CASE N0, PZ 83-25 We. the undersigned residents and/~or property owners in North Richland Hills not within 200 feet o~f the subject ro ert herP- P P Y by approve the rezoning of the said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, pros- perity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE : DATE : ADDRESS ...- ,, f ~ .I ~ - -- ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ `, i .~ f ~~ ~~ . ~ 1~ ~,~Sa~ 23 3 3 a,l ~ ~ ~~~ 7 ~.~ ,~,.. _ ~ g ~,~. ~~~~ ~r ~_ _! ________ T4 : City Council DATE ; City of North Richland Hills TIME; CASE No. PZ 83-25 We. the undersigned residents and/or property owners in North Richland Hills not within 200 feet o~f the subject ro ert herP- P P Y by approve the rezoning of the said tract for the fol lowin reasons : g This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, ros- P perity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. DATE : ADDRESS • ~~-•'~?iGwwti9-~(_ ~ l'1,-. Q? ~ n U ~ ~0 ~ ~ i i.C-n /1 r ~. ~_ ~' _.~ ~ S ~- -- ~ ~ _ ~.. r, '1 ~~ ~ t -- ~ ~e ,•~ • ~~ SIGNATURE : - .r i v«.a~ii_ L_ S ~~~-~ ~ ~ do~l I ~IFKA 2~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ /7/713 ~v ~~r ~Ct l~QSf Cie ~rc~~ A~Ca9,S~- ~~ 4~ / n L, n i-- r/ _ ~u ~ ,z ~' '' ` 1 w ~ ~ ~- _' - t-^~,, ~ Q ` 1 ! , l r ~ ~--;. -`,-~ • T0: City Council DATE; ~ City of North Richland Hills _ TI~1E: ~" CASE N0. PZ 83-25 WF~ , t~~e urx~ ersigned residents and/or property owners in North Richland ~~ills not within 200 feet o~f the subject ro ert herP- b a P P ,Y y pprove the rezoning of the said tract for the following reasons : This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, ros- e perity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE : DATE : _ ADDRESS ,~ '' ~ ~ -- ~, --. -- - ~-- D1 Z , , .~~ ~ - ~ ~- ,-~-~ _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ;. .--. ., I r ~ \,~ ~ ._. _... ~ ~- - ~1/ ~ - r, !+ ~ •. tea. ~~ / ' ~ ~ ... .~ f ~ 3 /~(/~- r ~ ~ ~~~~ T"~~ ~.~ / -~._ .~ .r 1 ~~ 1 ~ I ~ y y .~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ , ~~ , 70 _ __.._ . ~ ._._ ` j ------- 1~ . 4~ t1'~ ~ .. . i. T0: City Council City of North Richland Hills I CASE NO . PZ 8 3 - 2 5 We. the undersigned resid~ts and/or property owners in North Richland Hills not within 200 feet o~f the subject property, here- by approve the rezoning of the said tract for the following reasons This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, pros- pezity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE : DATE : ADDRESS ~- r ~ -- r^ r , /~ ') ~~' '~ . ~ ~ ~ a ~ ,~- ~.; , ~~ -~ i. ~~ I ..~-- __ DATE: T I~1E • 1 T~: City Council City of North Richland Hills CASE NC?, PZ 83-25 DATE ; _...~ _.. T I~iE ; We . the undersigned reside~rts and/or property owners in North Richland Hills not within 200 feet o~f the sub'ect ro ert P- b ] P P y, her. y approve the rezoning of the said tract for the followin reasons: g This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, ros- p perity, and general welfare of the present nei hborhood. g SIGNATURE : DATE : ADDRESS ~_____ J /~ '_ /: . ~--. .Mr, ~19i /1 s. n A~ ~ (/ ~~ ~ -~3 4 » ~~~~.~ C.~ . ' \s.' r'{i v: T0: Gity Council City of North Richland Hills 1 CASE N0. PZ 83-25 DATE ; T Il~1E we , the urx~ ersigned resid~ts and/or property owners in North .Richland Hills not within 200 feet o~f the subject property, here- by approve the rezoning of the said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, pros- perity, anc~ general welfare of the present neighborhood. ______ SIGNATURE : DATE : ADDRESS ; r) i' ~ ~ , ~, r~ ~,;n ~ ~~ ~,~ U 1 T0: City Council DATE; City of North Richland Hills TIME CASE NO . PZ 8 3 - 2 5 We, the undersigned residents and/or property owners in North Richland Hills not within 200 feet of the subject ro ert , P p Y hereby approve the rezoning of the said tract for the followin g reasons This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, prosperity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE ; DATE ; ~ ADDRESS ; /~ '"' -'~ / '"~ ~_._. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t~ .S ~~ O .~ . . ,~,,~•• r r T0: City Council , DATE , City of North Richland Hills TI~1E: CASE N0, PZ 83-25 We . the undersigned residents and/or property owners in North Richland Hills not withi n 200 feet o~f the sub' ect ro ert herP- ~ P P Y~ b a r y pp ove the rezoning , of the said tract for the following reasons : This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, ros- P peFity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE : DATE : ADDRESS ~E ~~ -- ~ ~'' 2- ~ ~~ 1 ~~ ____ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ t ~~~ ~~ K ti ` ~ ...~~~.3LL~ ~./ w ' / `~ ~ • ~I/ V ~ `.. .~~~ t ~ j ~ . r • ~~ r -.. ~ ~~ I / I t :, e ~ ,. ~~ 1' -1 ~f \ i ~~ i' ;; .1 ~ 1 I ~~ _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , o~ .~ . , , ,,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~, ( ~ (, /'~~~ ~ ~V I ~ ~N ~ . 1 . ' ~ ~. MAN _ ~~-~ ~ ~- , _ ~ . :~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~1 ~K ~,~ ~-o ~ C ., .. . . . ~'a ...... S rt I ! G~ v N i I i ~--- /'~ ova 1 { ~'~ NT~~--- Oho S I~"I o N ~c~ ~T~ ~ ~>c ~~ ~' ~ ~! ~ ;. ELI' ~ ~~ ~~ l.._. ~ ~D s~ ~ S ~ ~, 1--~ O ~ ~ ~~ ~ T 1 ~. `~' , ~ 1 ~ L.. L-- `. , I ~~ ~ / ~ ~ "~ • ~ ~ ~ ,\ w j T~• I ~ ~' ~~ r. ~.~y ~.r. ~ w .. ~ ~ f, . 1 ~ . ~. ~ .: ~~wr~ +..~ ~~_ . ~J \ 1 ~~• ~"~n sue,- ' `~.:^...~ ~ ~ ~ ' - ~ ! ~ .~---~-~. ~~. -- ~ ~`~ ~ ~ ~'~'--- ~~ ~ ~~ '~'~-sl ' tir ( 1 1 'C/ ,'. ... I"~.. r __ ......~. ~ - /' 1 ,w.rr~r • ..ter .' ~~+' ~ ~ .. ~ ' ^ ~w ~ ~ ,' t t' - ' ,' .j ~ ~ ~ aM~ ! ~J ~~ ~~ s ~~~ WI~-~ ~ + ~ =" Cow ~-~~ ,, C :, ., .~ ~~i ~ ~ ., ,, ,; ~~ ~ . ~ - ~ C~'~ J~ <J .. _~ _ ~~ ~ r -~ ~ C~N~ -~ z~~~av~~~~--5 ~~ ov ~ . __. ~ ~f Poste ~ ~ . ~c ~ .. ~~~J ~~~ .~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ V ~ I ~ l ~1 ~y .. _ .: ~ ~ ~.-~ `~--~~ r~J .. ~ I -s sum ~ . ,~ ~o N~ ~ ~ ..a Y ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D C ~ ~N ~ ~- c..- I M Pao ~ ~. ~~ ~ . y ' ~ z ~ ~~ a -~ ~ ~~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~.vS .- ~. 1 ~ ~ ` _f .: I r- ~ ~-- ~O ~' ~-~'1 ~ ~1 ~ (~-~ ~ ~ i ` ~ r Imo-' G ~.~p ~~-~J ~t Q ~- A ~ ~~ ~ 5 . •c r r 0 .~ CJ ~ ~. ~' ~ (~ ~ ~--~.. ~ wry ~ ~ ` .. ~--- ~ r ~._:fV ~~.-- p ~~ Q f 1 1 , M` 1\ , ' ~~ 1 ,~ ~ ' :~ ..._-• -- _ ., ,, ., { ., ;~ 3,^na~~n~ A~o~nl CoN~s WEST d1= co~or.~i,~>t-_ ~ifC1~/y ~ Sa~T~-} o~ -7-7j-~- ~ ~o _ ~i G~~ o~= - Why ~ N 1tN ~ir~~~~= I`~.t T~cSE UN i-r5 7a ~`~T C'~i= ~o~o N~ ,~/. is 1-~1.4Y ~ ~ o (z~7' c~ 1z -rF' c- -DES c, o ~I C-I-+T O ~ WAy ,\ J TNT ~~ACT I/~/~aT 0~ GozoiJlA~-~.~< ~ ~~~vlou~~y ~'2o'Po~~ ! ~-~ j~~A"SZ`~7~I~_l~~ ~Jo:J Q ~ Zo7J~~ ~~1~ Elul • D~~l ~T--S 11/ f C j~ I'r~l"~io r ~1~I ScJ81-~i-`"f'in1C~ ~I~C -°LOUt~I`T~ic' ~~o-~o;f',c.S Z HA~~ 'r~'o~~ TO • ~ r~~u %~A~FIG OrJ }~I~c-pQ~nl~-/~I<c~ `~/'f~l I/~' 1O ~~r~~cE TNT ~f~M~~ o~ A~P~k'ri~i~7r- IJ N I-ts ~ i G N I F I Cis iJ `~-/ ~ To ~A~~y~ /~,-i/ U • THc D~Parz-~vnJi-ry la C~~, F~ "I~~r,usri v` ~ -~ vi.l -!a -~-j-tom OAK ~C.,;:.,.~,J~ I'~o_,~.~;-~~ ~. -_, o TC TAKE ~J v ~ ~ ~ Q~~ ~--OD! I~LA!)J~, . ~= /~ ~EcT~~iT/orJ /=~c~i fJ;-9!Cli ~Jo~~ -'~ '`T ~-I ~. -/ ti v 1 ~~ ,~ ~~.~ ~ ' , ;! ~ ~~ ~, ~,, 'I i J __ _..._~.... _. ~ ~ v ', ~.- _ _. _... ~ _.. .__c~ .. . _. _. __. ~_ , ~. ~ C~~ ._ _ ~. --.~cc~~ ~5~ . _ ~ ~"l ~ I s _~, ~~' ~1 A L. D H ~ ~...., __ _.... .~ ~a .~ ~ ~ ~ a~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ l ~s ~u T1~~~1~.~,. r __ ~.. ~u ~~- ~ ~~-s ~~ __ . ., . _ .- ---- ~~ ~~ W 1 ~~ ~ l ~ ~-~ c._ _ 1~ ou ._~ :. ._ __ _. .. _ ;.. ;, i - - .. _.. __. _. _ . _. r .. i .... _..._.. .. ~ _ ,~ r ~ ' t . I . I f . , .. _ f ... .__.. t ~. . +~( ~...1_.. i - - .. _ .._.... _. May 17. 1983 W. Brown Custom Builders, Inc. 6533 Meadow Lakes Dr. Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Attention : Mr. Bob Frank, Project Manager REFERENCE; Rufe Snow Drive Overpass Gentlemen: Reference is made to our conversation on April 26, 1983. You re- ' quested information from our office concerning the feasibility of constructing a "free left turn" lane accross Loop 820 adjacent to the Rufe Snow Drive bridge. After looking at your sketch, I in- formed you that the overpass was possible and would take approxi- mately one (1~ year to implement. I also informed you that state funds would not be available for the proposal. You inquired what it would cost to construct a one lane overpass at this location and I estimated that •the figure would be ~n the $350, 000.00 ran e. g At this time, I also told you that the City of North Richland Hills would have to formally request this overpass and any contractural agreement would be between the City of North Richland Hills and the State Department of Highways. If you have any further questions or if I can be of further serviee, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, r ,~ ,'r c.;J Les 1 ie French District Designing Engineer ~. C ~ City of ~orth Richland Mills, Texas E~ sra~ a. cam FIRE DEPARTMENT Fln ChMt ~, April 28, 1983 ~~ To: Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council Members From: J.W. Howard, Fire Marshal Subj; Proposed Multi-Family Dwellings, Meadowlakes. After reviewing the Meadowlakes' master plan prepared by Worrell and Associates, Inc., Engineers/Planners located at 13619 Inwood Rd, in Dallas .Texas, it is apparent that th,e ingress to the proposed tracts I and II for the required fire department access is limited to one approach from the south off Meadowlakes Dr, With this limited access the first arriving emergency unit from the fire department would have an estimated six (6) minute response time to the east end of the property because of having to actually pass approximately two-thirds of the length of the property and then drive back in an eastward direction. Also with the alread resent _, _ y P congestion of Rufe Snow Dr, at 820 during certain times of the mornings and evenings this response time could be even more lengthy~.~ With only one entrance into this area of multi-family dwellings an add- itional problem could result from the blockage of the one and only entrance off of Meadowlakes Dr, The only solution to the ingress problem is to add another entrance to the east, closer to Rufe Snow Dr, off of Meadowlakes Dr. Respectfully, J. Howar Fire Marshal JWH:ms (811) 281.0041 / 1301 N,E, LOOP 8'20 / P. O. BOX 13305 ~l NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 16118 ~. (,Y # ~,,;, , ~.. KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS /fort Worth-Dallas Apri 1 15, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hi 11 s 7301 N.E, Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND NILLS, ` ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-25, PD, AG., & LR TO MF, PD, & SU-GOLF COURSE, GRID 119, 128 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and 'find that we could adequately 1 ocate this property on the zoning map should i t be passed by bath the Planning & Zoni ng Commission and the City Council . P1 ease note that a~ portion of the exi sti ng 1Uorth Richland Hil 1 s/Ha~tom City boundary line is incorrectly plotted on the Master Plan Layout Map submitted for our review, See attached copy of the proposed rezoning area superimposed on the City Map. r R C ARD W. ALB I N, P.E. RWA/ 1 j c cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. • BEDFORD, TEXAS 7~0~~ • 817/283-6211 • METRO /267.3367 i .. i ,. . ~. ~~ I V ~~ ~ Ac .. ~~°'J`..~ ~ z . ~A o ~ ~ ~iT'~ ~~ ~ ~ LR 1 ~ ... ... .. ._ , J 1 • ~ ~. • ~~ ~~ ` o ~' ~ ~~~ ~3•Zs ~ -• . ~~~PD, A6, & ~ Q ro pc,i 9c~, 'S' ~ Su-C~oI.F ~ ' G,t~ ~ GouQSE I ~ ~'~ .. ~ ~' ~ ~. . . _ ._._ .. / _ _.._ - f ~ H.r y ~- .~ C ~~ '~ . ,!, /- ,~ti ~' jot ~ ~ oRp. .... ;l r a ~_~ it 1 R .l ~ ~ *~~ ~ ~~-~° ~ v ,~ I 12 i ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ i R I ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~R s ~~« 1 ri ''~ r s. ~ ~~ I;' !f 1 ~ ~~ ~ I ~ `~ _.LI r - i ~. J ,, ~ ~. _ ~ ~ ~~ - MF ~ gZ, 3~ ; { ~ ~~ ' ~ L R "~' -• ' ~, TD `, a ~R ~AG ~`~~ , ~ ~ ' ~~.i i ~ r L a O 1 . -~, _ 7 ,/ I ~ ~- ~ r 1 ~ g3 • ~4- ~ ~' i ~ ~~ ~• ~ T ` ~ ~• ~ tiS~K • e' ~~ 83-ii aP, 3.Z8_g3 ~Rv• ioc'~ . 1! .; ~~ .~ C F P~ SZ•3~ M.F. ~ C.R. T4 CoM~, t- Z4.g3 ~~ 3,~a Tt~ : City Council _ DATE: City of North Richland Hills .TIME: CASE NO . PZ 8 3'- 2 5 . We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject pro ert hereb P y y appro~~e the rn2oning of said tract for the following reasons ; This rezoning would be conducive to the public convenience, comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the present nei h- g boyhood. -- .~._ _S IG~ r'11 U~' ~ ~ DATE : ADD S S`:_ ,- _~. __ ~ ~~~ _. ~~ .. _._.._..___._ ____ - ~ ~ 7 ~ . l ~ T, - - ~ ~ ,-~ . •~~ ~" ~ ii sr ~ ~ '~ ~ r ~____ / ____ _______ .- ------- ~~~~ T0: City Council _ ~ DATE: City of North Richland Hills TIME : CASE NO . PZ 8 3~- 2 5 We , the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject property, hereb Y approve the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would be conducive to the public convenience, comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the present neigh- bo rhood . S IGNATURE ~ DATE : ___ ADDRESS : ______ ~_ -~-- .1~~ - ~' _ ~ ,.~-~ ~' ,J .~- ~~ ~-~~ Pc~i ~1 arc. ~ r ~ ~ 3 s f Scr~~~` ~ -. z _ __ _. T0: City Council DATE: City of North Richland Hills TIME: CASE NO . PZ S 3~- 2 5 We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject ro ert hereb a r p p y y pp ove the rezoning of said .tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would be conducive to the public convenience f comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the present nei h- g borhood. _ - ____-~ S IGNATURE ~ DATE : . ------ _ ADDRESS . . _ _- ______ o ~ .,. _ S~ ~ Sv~~'~ _______. - ~_~~. ~ ______r__r.._ _ ~~ ~ T0: City Council DATE: City of North Richland Hills TIME; CASE N0. PZ 83~-25 we, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby approve the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons ; This rezoning would be conducive to the public convenience, comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the present neigh- borhood. S IGNATURE ~ DATE ; ADDRESS ; n T0: City Council . City of Iv'arth Richland Hills DATE :. TIME CASE NO . P7 8 3~- 2 5 We, the u:~dersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hi]~.ls, living within 200 feet of the subject property, r~ereb y ~~pprove the rezoning of said tract ,for the following reasons ; This rezoning woul~~ sae .conducive to the public convenience, romf~rt, prosperity, and general welFare of the present neich- boyhood. ~'; ~, ;.~_. IaL7DRE S S - ~ - ~.3 5Z)aL~1 ~. -- - - -- i ,~ . r ~ _, ~ ~ , tom; ;•~ rte: ~ . f....~...~..-. y'• ~ j~ ~• f~/ (. w.•~ `_-~' ~ (/ J" 1~ ~~ l ' ~ j ' e~ / .' .1 ~// /f / „ ~ ~~:, J ~ ~.. ~ ~ ..` // / L, ~ ;~ r' ---- - -- - ~ .---~. ~ i I / / ~ r' ~ .. I 1 ~ --- - ;~. l ' ~/ -, /' ~ ~ . , ~' ~ ` ^ ~ ' 1 ~ - f .~ ~ ~ -~ _ __ _.__ .3 1/3 ~.,~ .~. ,1. ,. , ,_ ... , ,/ I T C ~?,~1TEi RF ___ DATE TC': City Council .City of Nort}1 Richland Hills CASE NO , PZ 83-25 DATE; TIME We . the undersigned res idan~ is and /or property owners in North Riceland Hills ~ ~~ within 200 feet o~f the sub'ect ro ert h P- p p y, er . by approve the rezoning of the said tract for the followin reas g ons: T}1is rezoning would be conducive to public ,convenience, ros- P perity, and general welfare of the present nei hborhood. . 9 SIGNATURE ; DATE ________. ADDRESS . ,--, ,~ .• ,.... • I r ~ . ~ C' ~ ~ .. l ~ . ~ ----- - i T0: City Council _ City of North Richland Hills CASE N0 . PZ 8 ~- 2 5 DATE: TIME : We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject propert hereb y y approve the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons ; This rezoning would be conducive to the public convenience, comfort, prost~erity, and general welfare of the present neigh- borhood. --- - - ~ . S IGNA RE . DATE : _ ADDRESS ~T` _ ~ ~/) l ~ ------- ~/ v _ ~_ ~ 3 ~~ - _____ -- _ .. i T0: City Council City of North Richland Hills CASE N0. PZ 83'-25 DATE: TIME We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject propert hereb . ~' y approve the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would be conducive to the public convenience, comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the present ne igh- borhood. SIGNATURE DATE• __ ADDRESS: 4 ~~?~ ~-I-~~~_ ~ Flo ~ ~- c ~,ro - - S-19-63 ~~(o~~vtE~- ,. _____ T'O: City Council City of North Richland Hills CASE N0. PZ 83~-25 DATE: TIME We , the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within z00 feet of the subject property, hereb Y approve the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons; This rezoning would be conducive to the public convenience, comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the present neigh- borhood. SIGNATURES DATE: ADDRE _______ _ SS . G-G,~ ~~.~~ i• .r ~. ++.+..~.~~ . ~~~ V 1'~~ r .. ..~ TC1: C`i ty Council City of North Richland Hills CASE NQ . PZ 83-25 DATE: __.___. T I~1E : t~1e . t?~e unc~ ers igned residetn~ts and/or property owners in North Riclzlancl Hills within 200 feet o~f the subject propert here- . .y by approve the rezoning of the said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, ros- P perity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. GNATURE : DATE : ADDRESS : < < ,, .__ '-- ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ i ( ~ T -=~ ...- --- i ~.f: C ~ ~; ~, ~, ,; ~f, ~._ ( ,' r ~ .,~ , • ~ ; ~ w .~.~ ~~. _ ~._ . ~~ ~ ~ I ~ __ ; ~`--- v ,~ . 111 1 ~ l ~ ; , , ~_ ..... r ~ ~ 1 "' ~ ~ r h •~ C ~~ ~~~ ~ - -~ ~ ~ ,~ -I /" ^ __ i, - .__._.. - _.,~.. ~..~ _____ L C --~. . ~~ ~ ~ '~ ~~? ~~ ~,, v~r _~., ~.. / ~- ~- -` w fir' J r~ i ~ ~ ( i l ~~ ' _ t ~'~~~~ ~1 ~~^ f ~ r T~: City Council DATE; C i t~~ o f North Richland Hills TIi~')E ; CASE ~NO . PZ 8 3 - 2 5 WF~ . the urx.3 ersigned resio~n~ts and/or ro ert ~ ' ~~ , ~ p p y owne rs in North ic~~ 1 ~~nd Ali 1 is within 240 feet o~f the sub ' ect ro ert ~ h P- 7 p p }, er, ~y approve the rezoning of the aaid tract for the followin g reasons: 'I'lzis rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, pros- pPrit~~, and general welfare of t~~e present nei hborhood. g S IGI~~ATUP.E : DATE ~ -~-+~ %- ,,. _ _ ,, ,, , ~ ' Y - ~ ~ ~ .~ ~~~, 1 .~~) 'mil ~ J I /~ /~~ /~~ \, S , ~ L • ; - ~ ~~ ~y, ~ .~.Y _ ~ ~-~ ~~- i --- ._-_.._.__ ._. -.-.--_-_ __ ! .~ - -- ___.__ . _. _ . .~ 3 (_ ~ ~~~ ~ _~'" . - ~~ ~ ~..-~+~- ~~~_ ~_~~~ ~' 1~~ ~~~ T0; City Council City of North Richland Hills C DATE : vim-/ ~ -~ TIME: ~ : ~~ N( CASE NO . PZ 8 3~- 2 5 We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hi~.ls, living within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby approve the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons; ~,,~~,.~~~~~ ~ . ~ ~ V '~ r ~"' ~' ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~~ .. ~~. . ~ ,, ~ ,~/ •'~ / ~ ~. r ~ -~. ~,,. p,,rf, ~"'~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ , r~ ~~ , . 1 ~ ~ J ~~~ . ~ _ . . ~ ~- ~ ~ ; ~. ,~ , . ta:, ~- -- ~-- ~C `i,i,,' ..~ / fir' ~ ; ~.~__ ~, ~~s:~~y~ ~ ~ .~ _ ,~ ` ,/~J h .~ ~ .~( ~~~ //,/` `)/:~ ~ _L z. t. ~~ y o Sj,~ .f ~ f~ ~...,~ '. . _ _ -~--~ . v~ ,tip This rezoning would be conducive to the public convenience, comfort, prosperity, and general welfare of the present neigh- borhood. IC~ATliRE ~ DATF : ADDRESS i (J ~' r t . M 111 ~" f TO : City Council City of North Richland Hills DATE ~ ~''~~- _ ~ ~-. . _" TIDE. .3~ .~. CASE NQ , PZ 8 3 - 2 5 We , the undersigned res ide~ts and/or property owners in North .Richland Hills not within 200 feet o~f the subject property, here- by approve the rezoning of the said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, pros- perity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE : ~ DATE : ADDRESS ~ / -~ , .~ - -~ -- ' - .,.:~~a.~. .~, ' r 1 ~ f w ` v ~ ~} ~t T0: City Council City of North Richland Hills DATE ; T I~'IE : CASE NO . PZ 8 3 - 2 5 We . the undersigned resioan~ts and/or property owners in North Rieh~and Hills not within 200 feet o~f the subject property, here- by approve the rezoning of the said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would be conducive to public convenience, pros- perity, and general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNATURE : DATE : ADDRESS • ,~ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ .~ ~ ~ to ,~ ~ ~2~/ ~•~, 7 7c~'~~~~ , ~ ' ~ ,. ~ , ~ ~ r ~. ~ .~ ~ i 4 c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,. { ~~ sr~ ~~ ©~~~~~~c~ ~7 ~Z _. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ S ~, - ~; - ~ ~ ~ ~ ri i ~~ l i `r _~ r ~ ,.u-(..-~G ,_ ~ ~ ,~.. ~~ ~ , ~~' ~ .~' ~ ~ i ~ ~~ !} r ~~ _~ ~ 7 ~~~~ /~ L J .. ~• s ` t ~' k 1, "' f /~" ~/_~ .~~ ~'! --~ ~ ~L' R~~ '.~ ~.i ~,i.~t ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~.~{ % ~? !' _ ~ L- ~ _ ti ~ ' , ~ ~ ~. fir, 1' ,~ - -- R G ~f r~~. L- , ~ '~S = ~.: 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~-/ ~ ~ ~' ,'~~ Page 17 25. Mayor Faram stated he had been informed that Mr. Gary CITIZEN PRESENTATION Bryant could not be present tonight and requested to be MR. GARY BRYANT - placed on the June 27, 1983, agenda. T.C.O.A.D.A. RE: SUPPORT FROM THE ALCOHOL TAX FUNDS GRANTED 26. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of June 13, 1983. ADJOURNMENT Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary MINUTES OF THE RECESSED MEETING OF MAY 23, 1983, OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JUNE 13, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Faram called the recessed meeting of May 23, 1983 to CALL TO ORDER order at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor Jim Ramsey Mayor Pro Tem Jim Kenna Councilman Richard Davis Councilman S.C. Hubbard Councilman Dick Fisher Councilman Harold Newman Councilman Marie Hinkle Councilwoman Staff: Rodger Line City Manager Jeanette Moore City Secretary Rex McEntire City Attorney Richard Albin City Engineer Lou Spiegel Director of Finance John Whitney Purchasing Agent Gene Riddle Director Utility/Public Works Absent: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager 3. The invocation was given by Mr. John Hinkle INVOCATION 4. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone PLANNING & ZONING wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come PUBLIC HEARING forward. PZ 83-28, REQUEST OF WAYNE WATERS TO Mrs. Wayne Waters, 2700 Willow Park, appeared before the REZONE TRACT 2C, Council. J.B. EDEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 499, FROM Mrs. Waters stated they wanted to zone four lots residential AGRICULTURE TO with a minimum of 1,500 square feet. 1F-9-ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition EAST OF STONEYBROOKE to the request to please come forward. DRIVE AT THE END OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE AND Mrs. Helon Currie, 8617 Hightower, appeared before the Council. APPROXIMATELY 866 FEET WEST OF EDEN Mrs. Currie stated that the original request was for 1,300 ROAD) square feet and they had issued a petition against the change. Mrs. Currie stated that since the zoning had been upgraded to 1,500 square feet they did not object. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Page 2 5. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to CONSIDERATION OF approve PZ 83-28, Ordinance No. 1031. ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-28 Motion carried 7-0. ORDINANCE NO. 1031 APPROVED 6. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone PLANNING & ZONING - wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come PUBLIC HEARING forward. PZ 83-29, REQUEST OF SOUTHLAND FINANCIAL Councilman Davis asked to be excused from the Council table SERVICES, INCORPORATED because his firm had done some surveying work for the applicant. TO REZONE TRACT 1, JOHN CONDRA SURVEY, Mayor Faram excused Councilman Davis. ABSTRACT 311, FROM 1F-9-ONE FAMILY DWELL- Mr. Jim Harris, with Southland Corporation, appeared before the INGS TO 1F-8-1500 - Council. ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON THE EAST Mr. Harris stated this would be an addition to Foster Village. SIDE OF RUFE SNOW Mr. Harris stated they were asking for the 1F-8 zoning, but in DRIVE AND APPROXI- the sections that had previously been developed the house size MATELY 425 FEET NORTH was 1,500 square feet. OF STARNES ROAD) Mr. Harris stated that they had improved the portion of Rufe Snow Drive that was adjacent to the subdivision at their own expense. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 7. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to CONSIDERATION OF approve PZ 83-29, Ordinance No. 1032. ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-29 Motion carried 5-1; Councilman Kenna, Newman, Fisher, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 1032 Pro Tem Ramsey and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Councilman APPROVED Hubbard voting against. 8. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone PLANNING & ZONING wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come PUBLIC HEARING forward. PZ 83-30, REQUEST OF GAYLORD VAN Y TO Mr. Gaylord Van Y, owner of the property, appeared before the REZONE A PORTION OF Council. BLOCK H, RICHLAND OAR: ADDITION FROM LOCAL Mr. Y stated the request to change the zoning from Local RETAIL TO COMMERCIAL Retail to Commercial was so a shopping center and warehouse (LOCATED AT THE SOUTH- could be built. Mr. Y stated that the warehouse would be EAST CORNER OF GRAPE- leased to Baird's Bakery as a transfer unit. Mr. Y stated VINE HIGHWAY AND there would be an eight foot wood fence and a row of trees ELDORADO) separating the center from the adjoining property. Mr. Byran Baird appeared before the Council. Page 3 Mr. Baird stated he had buildings of this type in other areas and had no problems. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Mrs. Lee Straw, 8117 Jerri Jo, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Straw stated the whole area was in opposition to this request. Mrs. Straw stated that if a warehouse was built there would be 18-wheel trucks in and out of the area at all hours of the day and night. Mrs. Straw stated there was a petition from the residents in the area against the request. Mr. Jay C. Thompson, 8201 Jerri Jo, appeared before the Council. Mr. Thompson stated he lived next to the property in question and was very much opposed. Mr. Thompson stated that if a warehouse was constructed there was no guarantee it would function. Mr. Thompson stated a warehouse would create more traffic in the area. Mr. Charles Ibsen, 5000 Nevada Trail, appeared before the Council. Mr. Ibsen stated he was against the request because the ware- house would cause more traffic in the area. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 9. Mayor Faram advised the Council there was a legal petition on CONSIDERATION OF this request and would require six positive votes of the ORDINANCE FOR Council. PZ 83-20 DENIED Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to deny PZ 83-30. Motion carried 7-0. 10. Mayor Faram adjourned the recessed meeting of May 23, 1983. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. on June 13, 1983 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN PRE-COUNCIL 6:00 P.M. 1 . i '7 Discussion of Budget Supplement for the Library - Mayor Pro Tem Jim Ramsey 2. is Discussion of Appointments to the Board of Adjustment - Councilman Harold Newman 4 "Discussion of Appointment to Civil Service - _ Commission - Councilman Dick Fisher 4 Discussion of Rate Increase for CBS/Black Hawk Communications (Agenda Item # 23) 5. ,/scussion of Rate Increase Request for Texas Electric Service Company (Agenda Item # _1) 6. ,/I Discussion of Awarding Bid for General Liability and Property Insurance /(Agenda Item '/20 ) __. 7 �' Discussion of Ordinance Abatement of ____ Daneerous_Buildings (Agenda Item#IB ) 1 _x8- ' Discussion of Constructing Right-Turn Lane Iar Rufe SuuN_. rive and Northeast Loop 820 (.Agenda Item a16)__ 1 • Page 2 - Pre Council CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. on June 13, 1983 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. Discussion of Other Items 10, Executive Session to Discuss Personnel, (Closed due to subject matter) Land and/or Litigation DATE: June 8, 1983 SUBJECT: PZ 83-28 Zoning request from Agriculture to 1F-9-One Family Dwelling on Tract 2C, J.B. Edens Survey Abstract 499. Wayne E. Waters DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is located east of Stonybrooke Drive at the end of Hightower Drive and approximately 866 feet west of Eden Road. There were 11 property owners contacted and a petition with 6 out of 11 names on it. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this Zoning request with the stipulation that the houses be a minimum of 1500 square feet. This request was recessed at the May 23, 1983 Council Meeting. rr^NCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Zoning Request. .. ,EIEP I71'l:: ',ES N/A NO N/A ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A Page 17 P & Z Minutes April 28, 1983 Charles Irving, 7816 Odell Stre asked if he could speak. He id the city has forgotten them ' this area; when they sweep the s eets, they forget them; when ey spray for mosquitoes, t " forget them; when they repair th treets, they forget them; but wh they collect taxes, they do.-t forget them. PZ 83-27 Mr. Bowen made the motion to deny - - DENIED PZ 83-27. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 5-0. RECESS Chairman Tucker called a recess at r , 8:45 P. M. B: TO ORDER Chairman Tucker called the meeting back to order at 8:50 P. M. with the same members present. 11. PZ 83-28 Request of Wayne E. Waters to rezone Tract 2Ci J. B. Edens Survey, Abstract 499, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of 1F-9-One Family Dwellings. This property is located east of Stonybrooke Drive at the end of Hightower Drive and is approximately 866 feet west of Eden Road. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge came forward to represent Mr. Waters. He said they are requesting a rezoning from Agriculture to 1F-9 to allow development of four lots. The Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Bruce Auld, Attorney with offices at 669 Airport Freeway, Suite 309, Hurst, came forward. He said he was representing Mr. S Mrs. Daniel Curry who are opposed to this request as well as other property owners in the area. Page 18 • P & Z Minutes -- April 28, 1983 1 Mr. Auld said he had a petition signed by 22 property owners in the area who are opposed to this request. He said their objections were that it would completely break the continuity of the homes in Stonybrooke. Mr. Auld said the homes in the area are 1400 to 1600 square feet, the ones on Hightower are 1500 square feet. He said the lots look smaller than the other ones there. He said if this zoning goes - through, it would allow smaller lots and smaller houses. Mr. Auld said he lives in Richland Hills and is a councilman there, and he understands they must consider if this is the highest and best use of this land, but you can turn this down tonight and they can go hack to the drawing board. He said the way it stands now, it would allow too small houses and the lots would be only half or two thirds as deep as the adjoining lots. Mr. Auld said without doing any studying, he felt it would place the houses there adjacent to the front yard of the Curry's as well as ' everyone -else. Mr. Auld said you could see on the petition that the ones who signed it are not opposed to more development there, but they are opposed to the small houses, and they feel they are trying to squeeze too may houses on too little land. Chairman Tucker stated that the present zoning for Stonybrooke Addition is 1F-9 and they are asking for 1F-9. He asked Mr. Auld if he was asking the Commission to deny this request when it is the same. Mr. Auld stated he was not aware it was the same zoning, but he did not feel they should allow a 1300 square foot house next to a 1500 square foot house. • Page 19 - P & Z Minutes April 28, 1983 Mr. Wood said the building line would ( be the same as required for the Subdivision, also. Mr. Auld said they are squeezing too many in this small area. Mr. Hannon said their smallest lot shows to be 11,000 square foot and the requirement for 1F-9 zoning is 9,500 square feet. - Mr. Auld said the house size was the most important factor. Chairman Tucker said the zoning on Stonybrooke Addition is 1F-9 with the stipulation that 20%-1600 square feet, 20%-1500 square feet, and 20%-1400 square feet. Palmer Hoffner, 7300 Stonybrooke, came forward. He said there were rumors going round that they were going to build 1, 100 square foot houses. Mr. Hoffner said he felt 1,300 square foot homes would be different. He said he felt the people would be in favor of it if it were consistent with the ones there. He said he doesn't think they are against the development, but if the Commission approved this request, it would benefit the developer, not the people. Mrs. Waters came forward. She said they had owned this property for a long time. She said they are not sure what size houses they will build here. Mr. Hannon asked if they would agree to a minimum of 1500 square feet. Mrs. Waters said they would. Mr. Auld said the property owners would accept that. • PZ 83-28 Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve APPROVED PZ 83-28 with the stipulation that the houses be a minimum of 1500 square feet. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. 1 S�- a�'- P3 } g: srf. • 1O e'' c April 28th, 1983 To the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission and to the members of the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. We, the following property owners of Stonybrooke, do hereby object to the re-zoning of Tract 2C, J. B. Edens Survey, Abstract 499, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of 1F-9-One Family Dwelling, unless the classification specified a minimum - - 1 ,500 square feet restriction on the houses to be built. Property y//Owners Addresses i`„a/� UYG® •-rim. .?.- '�' _ , _i%\T. fer n, cisas lir, r „ /. �,) ■ OK ,_ 1l__,...... mss— iT6( - ' /o a/ ,*. imaifi1, rirt 7$ e Ls i,, J (if e oY--- Ara c? , or CK2570iw • `om- ( 5 �1 1-.$)_a- GAL_ -/ " 2Y ./ .., c-1, 4 /2 -444 7 � //ii'1 _,-;$(7_,7--C 5.1 2_ ClaA/LPiil I/1-1E9, % / ll„ , r r G 4... cf 61 ., (°�F S(rit eu, L , i) -e 1-'.,:j Lik.. iw 3(rlG C�,jYvtcct (2 oX-- (6 euk ' trr, ig(0 ID, C 'u-&,-ti .L LC,L --...1 v 79�x e st-iQ d”' 7,c2.0 9 f2pt yLeC- c • P. 2 Property Ormers Addresses las _A _.r' _s'i,n 1! - • C 0� / 0 0 r ' 1 KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. JI CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ Fort Worth-Dallas April 15, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-28, AG 10 IF-9, GRID 62 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council . Al f i R CHARD W. ALBIN, P. E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 • B17/263-6211 • METRO/2673367