The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1983-06-27 Agendas · ·CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For· the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7;30 p.m. on .Tnnp 27, lq81 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7:00 P.M. 3. Discussion of Re uest of' CBS/Black Hawk Communications (A enda Item #11 4. Discussion of Other Items -1_ .-=±-- -- - ----+ , '---. , --- ~-~ ~- -' I ~-r- --- -f'- -------------..~~ A ,/ DATE: June 27. 1983 . SUBJECT: . . . Appointment to Civil 'Service DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Administration Councilman Dick Fi~hpr h~~ rprnmmpnñp~ rnø ~rrn;ntm~nt of Mr. Jerf Newsom.to replace Bob Skelton who resigned. This is .a Mayor appointment confirmed by the Council. CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES NO N/A --~~--~~-~~----~~---~---~-~~~-~----~---~~~~~~~~~-~~-~~~~-~-~~~-~-~-~~~-~~--~--~~--~~-~~-~~~ .. - PROFILE 'FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS .ame fTé ç.ç' £" /~SD h:v, ::k Address ¿-<If) {J . /J.t-:VhÆ> I'~!ie ~~ 'Employer ~& ¿¿)~ ;;;;;e~ V/¿e.- !£) T/U'!" Phone: Home .1-fJ/- '13 6/ Office 6t;~h- 37~3 Wife's Name ~!2ØM;¿ c~ren's Ñame, and' Ages_ Hlnj!- / / ~~; ~ Wf/¿.soA/' $/ 7; ~-Jr\/L//9 H /ì-Nj 3' < '\;:Jtð~ b/}~ "2 o?&', ./ Resident of the City since ¡L~ / Previous Residence Occupation Do you own real property in Nor-th Richland H111s? Ye!S~. ~ _'. , 'Nó ~e~::s. ~tions and Previous Experience on City Commission: .,. , . Comment {About yourself, -why y~~ wi~h to serve, qualifiéations and o~~êr -------; , (~, 1 June 15, 1983 To: From: Re: ' Mayor Dick Faram Beverly Riley Expired terms of Cable Advisory Panel members . The following list contains the names of the current members of the North Richland Hills Cable Advisory Panel. Terms for those names which have been starred indicate that their terms expire this month during the odd-numbered year. I am requesting that the City C04ncil make appointments to these places to avoid vacancies on the Panel. Thank you so much. * Place 1 Ray Fulenwider, Richland Hills Church of Christ (clergy) Place 2 Beverly Riley (citizen) * -PlaL.t:: 3 Ðan-Beh~-s~G-}- ')rr NOV/Aðl'f ttllj Place 4 Marge Isbell (BISD) * Place 5 Nancy Gum (citizen) Place 6 Tiffany Nourse (City Staff) * Place 7 ~1arie Hinkle (City Council) . (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 .I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TEXAS 76118 . , OJ ,., i-~./ DATE: June 27, 1983. Appointment to Board pf Adiustment DEP ARTMENT : Administration BACKGROUND: Councilman Harold Newman has recommended the Re-appojntment of Harold Schubert and the appointment Hans Kossler who 'serves as'an Alternate at the,present time. Twn A'~prn~~p~ wi" ~ø ~rroint~ð '~t~r This is a Council appointment. . CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove BUDGETED ITEM: . YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A -~-~~-----~-~--~-~~~---~--~--~~-~~-~~~~~-~-~~~-~--~~~~~~--~-~~~~-~~~-~---~----~----~----~-~ . DATE: June 13, 1983 '// (.~JECT : Request of·CBS Blackhawk'Cable TV for Rate Increase DEP .A.RTMENT : Administration BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of the consultant's report reconmending the requested rate relief. As provided in the City's Ordinance regulating cable television, a public hearing has been advertised to b~ held this date. The ordinance further provides that, if no action is taken on the "request within 90 days of its subn~ssion, the requested rates are automatically approved. The 90 day period expires July 4, 1983, which would perI~LÍt the. Councíl . tc? defer action on this n~tter until Jun~ 27th, 1983. __ -'-'a -----.-.-.....-..--..... .,- i:. .. "i. '- -'. -¡ .. , . . ---.... - .. -- -. .--.....-. _. ~ ----.--. ~.--. -- ...-------.-.-...-.. CI'J.Y rC)~H~CIL ACTION REQUIP..ED: Defer action on the requested rate increase until June 27th, 1983 - -_.. ..-.---_..__.--.---.------~-- ---_. ---- !:~r i.J:JET:ED ITF"}i: YES 1'J() £1l~; :\ccrY~JNT 1':lTMBER: ~~----~~--~-~~~-~~~~--~~-~----~-~-~-----~~~~-~~~-~--~~-~~~~~~----~----~~-~-~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~ . _.~'.~' -- . . ~', ,~~ .... ., (. fI CBS/BLÁCK HAWK CABLE COIvMUNICATIONS CORP ~.'. "' 305 LOOP 820 NE, SUITE 410 . HURST, TEXAS 76053 (817) 589·7791 JOSEPH W. HIPPLE, III VICE PRESIDENT Dear Roger: April 4, 1983 I respectfully request that CBS/Black Hawk Cable Communications Corp. be granted a hearing for the purpose of increasing the basic rate for ,Cable Television service from $6.50 per month to $8.50 per month and the additional outlet rate from $1.50 per month to $3.25 per month. We are also seeking a $.50 per month converter maintenance charge since we are experiencing tremendous losses and' damages to our co~verters. (e Since we began operation we have held our rates even though costs have risen tremendously. For example, the automatic pass through of copyright fees granted in the franchise has never been utilized since we want~d to hold our rates as long ~s possible- Unfortunately, this can't be done any longeL. We have received major increases,~.~n operating expenses. Inf.lation, postage, . , '. copyright fees.l· pròperty t~xes, electricity, gasoline, construction costs, and programming costs are the primary contributors to these drastic increases., We have also experienced increases in our costs for carrying HOme Box Office, Showtime and Cinemax. We have no alternative but to increase Home Box Office and Showtime from $7.50 per month to $9.50 per month and Cinemax from $6.50 per month to $8.50 per month on July I, 1983. We have never charged for these services on an additional outlet, but we will start chargìng $5.00 per service on July 1, 1983, also. Since 1978 CBS/Black Hawk has served the City of North Richland Hills with the finest entertainment and quality services the Cable Television industry has to offer. We have met and exceeded every franchise requirement and have continuously kept the North Richland Hills system a state-of-the-art showcase. .. As these increases are something we don't relish getting or g~v~ng it is in the interest of the City to have a financially strong company that can continuously offer more services to its customers and franchising authority that make Cable TV such an exciting promise. .'~., ,~, ~' . C".. . '" c. ce "- . ,. Pa ge 2 April 4, 1983 We respectfully request that a hearing be scheduled for ~ril 25, 1983 so that·we can share with you a review of the economic forces that make such an unwelcome request so vitally necessary. Please feel free to give me a call should you have questions. Sincerely, Mr. Roger Line Ci y Manager P.o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 cc: City Council members, City SecretarY/~yor ,."::"~.". . ..'~'.,~" _. .. .. c. re ,~~- .. ~ ,- 5108 Holiday L~ne North Richland Hills, TX May 12, 1983 City of North Richland Hills P. o. Box 18609 North Richland H1ll~, TX 76118 Dear Sir/Mêldam: This is to voice my opposition to the propoeed rate hike sought by the CBS/Blackhawk Cable Commun1cat1on~ Corp. I W~8 in one of the last locations in the city to have cable become av~11able and subscribed to what was then the complete package as soon as installation was PQss1ble. This included (and presently includes) the basic cable plus the pay channels BEO, Showt1me, and C1nemax wired for two TV sets. I have been paying $29.50 per month for this service. Other pay ch~nnels have been made available by Black Hawk but I have kept the s~me subscription. , Under the proposed rate hike, my monthly payment for the same service would be $44.75. That is well over 50% increase in rates which I feel 1s excessive. I !eel_ that an increase in rates is warranted due to cost of living increases and 1nflab1on . but not to that extent. One reason that the company should not hàve substantial increases is because they have not provided tbe service promised when _ advertis lng to potential subscribers. Weather Ra.dar vias a most desirable feature"-'·of- the ca.ble system when I subscribed and - probably influenced me to take the cable and dismantle my outside antenna. After only a few months, the weather r~dar wa.s removed from the system and hasn't been Been since. I have called the company many times and h~ve written a question concen11ng weather radar twice on the monthly statements. I have been given several explanations and each time, except the last, was told that they were working on the weather radar lines or that they were" going to substitute a national weather service channel com~lete with national weather radar. The l~st query, which was only a few days ~go, obtained the answer that they bad dro~d all plans for weather radar or a national weather service channel. In conclusion, a sizeable increase in rates will result in a reduction of my subscript10n (drop pay channels) in order to a.~r"d the monthly pa.yments. I'f others react 1n a s1milar manner, the company will not see much increase in profits. ~ -/~ - f~ Thanks for your consideration, _ J - -- - - - .- ~dR:b~ Harold R. Dobkins. - ---- -- - ~--- -- -_.__._-- --~ ...--, _._---- , . -----1 ¡ i ,- - -- - - ----; , . -- ------- - - I - ..-- --- ,-- --------1 , ; ---------- ,-------. -------. f - - ------ - - -', - ---- --t . -)-.' ." ...,; -. --- - -- ------------- ----; . -' - , : ~ ~--=- .'. ~---'~-_:"-~---_.-- -- -------; .' I' '). .I\> ' ~ 1"' · ,., . CBS/BLACKHAWK CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Rate Request Dated April 4, 1983 Affected Cities: Haltom City - North Richland Hills . ASSOCIATED UTILITY SPECIALISTS ::k;q\ffS {~ P. ù. BOX 3714 IRVING. TEXAS 75061 5-Z7~c.~ . . ~. -" ...., . CBS/BLACKHAWK CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Rate Revision Request Dated April 4, 1983 Public Utility Status of CATV It is generally recognized that Cable Television operations do not fit into the basic definition for a Public Utility in the sense that they are nòt entrusted with tke furnishing to the general public of essential services and/ or products available to the public from only one source. CATV does not have the monopolistic characteristics of a Public Utility, and does not enjoy the protective covenants which literally guarantee to a Public Utility a profit from it's operations. CATV faces strong competition from the following sources: Network Television, Local Programming, Pay TV, and Home Television Movies. At the same time, theaters are actively competing for a share of the entertainment revenue dollar. The Public Utility Regulatory Act of 1975 (Texas) carefully recognized the non-utility status of CATV in exempting such enterprises from the regulatory control of the Public Utility Commission (Section 3-C-2a PVRA). . As a consequence of the above factors, CATV is characterized by High Investor Risk Factor and Demand For Management Competence to offset the obvious dis- advantage of the High Risk Factor. The granting of franchises for CATV has been characterized by frenzied competition which often relegated "profit motive" to an initial position of secondary importance. Without the avail- ability of competitive advantage(s) in programming offered, CATV companies must rely on quality of service and effective management in order to maintain competitive status in the industry. Rate Structure is extremely important, reflecting extreme pressure from the points of Customer Preferences and Investor Expectations. If rates are non-competitive, the customer will exercise his option and choose an alternate entertainment mode (likewise with Service). By the same token, if rates are too competitive (reflecting artifically low comparisons) neither Customer Service Demands nor Investor Expectations can be satisfied. Requested Rates For purposes of comparison the Requested Rates are illustrated below in relation to the company's current rates and those of two other Local Area Systems: CBS/Blackhawk Service Current Requested System "A" System "B" -.--- Basic Rate $ 6.50 8.50 7.95 7.00 Converter Maint. 0 0..50 0 0 Horne Box Office 7.50 9.50 6.95 7.00 Showtime 7.50 9..50 6.95 7.00 . Cinemax 6.50 8.50 7..95 7.00 Movie 9.75 9.75 3 ,ü 0 8.95 7.00 Additio·nal Outlet 1.50 ~ 4.95 2.50 HBO 0 5.00 6.95 3.00 ST 0 5.00 6.95 3.00 C 0 5 . O(}·',~'''~ 7.95 3.00 M 0 5.00 8.95 3.00 . . . , . If we view the rate structures on an average customer basis encompassing basic service plus two optional programming services, the company is requesting an increase of 31.7% in rates which will result in rates 18.2% in excess of those of System "A" and 28.6% in excess of System "B" rates. It is also noteworthy that System "A" is in the process of filing for a rate increase. The Service Reputation of the CBS System is Superior to that of both System "A" and System "B". Current Operating Status Certain documentation was reque,sted of the company in support of it's rate request, namely: A. Operating Statement For Twelve Months Ended 12-31-82 B. Balance Sheet As of 12-31-82 c. Source and Application of Funds 6-15-82 through 12-31-82 D. Year End Subscribers By Category of Service 12-31-82 and 12-31-8l E. Comparison of Reve~ues: Current Rates Vs. Requested Rates F. Allocation Explanations: Operating Statement and Balance Sheet The requested data was furnished in timely fashion and is attached hereto as exhibits identified alphabetically above. Brief comments will fallow relative to each item of documentation, but it should be borne in mind that the company's own Operations cover only a period of 199 days in 1982 (predecessor operations are reported for the period January I-June 15, 1982). Exhibit "A" indicates Haltom City operations to have produced a NET LOSS PRIOR TO FIT of $433,000 - company operations in North Richland Hills reflect a NET LOSS PRIOR TO FIT of $617,000. It should be noted that the company has elect~d to capitalize Leased Items in lieu of expensing Lease Payments. Exhibit "B" (Balance Sheet) indicates for the company's TOTAL NORTH OPERATIONS that the NET VALUE of plant and Equipment exceeds EQUIPMENT LEASE LIABILITIES PLUS OWNER'S EQUITY by $386,363. Exhibit "e" (Source and Applic.ation of Funds) reflects operating loss from Exhibit "A", and a reduction in Working Capital. Exhibit "D" depicts growth in numbers of subscribers by category - growth for both Haltom City and North Richland Hills Systems are good for the year 1982. Exhibit "E" represents the application of 1982 "Year End" subscribers by category to both Requested Rates and Current Rates. As such, true revenue differentials can be identified as shown below: Haltom City N. Rich1and Hills RevPllue: Current Rates Revenue: Requested Rates Differential % of Differential $1023287 $1523288 $ 500001 48.9% $1457198 $2166095 $ 708897 48.7% The differential shown represents the actual additional revenues to be anticipated if the requested rates were applied to 1982 "year end" subscribers. Bnslc Growth Factor has not been applied to these calculations. . ~. ,.~,.... " . -2- . . . 1982 Actual vs. Projected 12 Months at Requested Rates The table immediately following depicts for Haltom City and North Rich1and Hills franchises 1982 operating results (per Exhibit "A" attached) compared to a projected 12 month operating period under the requested rates (dating from December 31, 1982). The following factors are utilized in formulation of the projected 12 month operating resutls: Basic Growth Factor is predicated upon 1982 trend: Haltom City = 7.76% North Richland Hills = 4.62% Franchise Expenses are calculated on 1982 actual plus additional revenues to be experienced. Depreciation Expense is calculated on applicant company's actual for 199 days of 1982 annualized times capital addition growth factor annualized. Capital Addition "Growth Factors" are: Haltom City 1.03172 North Richland Hills - 1.03208 Other Expenses are calculated on company's actual for 1982 annualized times Basic Growth Factor. Federal Income Taxes are calculated at Statutory Rate without adjust- ment for Investment Tax Credits and Deferral Attributable to Accelerated Depreciation. Projected Revenues are incremented by Basic Growth Factor. Highlights of Projected Operating Statement Haltom City N. Richland Hills Total Revenues Increased Total Expenses Decreased Net Prior to FIT Increased Net Profit Increased Net Profit Return on Owner's Equity $654,495 $(11,156) $665,651 31.35% 7.65% 7.34% $839,169 $(62,352) $901,521 30.13% 6.78% 6.03% Action Recommended On Rate Application: Approval of the Company's application is recommended. The company's operating statements indicate Pre-Tax Losses of $433,000 and $617,000 in 1982 for operations in Haltom City and North Richland Hills respectively (166 days predecessor and 199 days CBS operation). It is a certainty that existing rate structure was established on a "franchise acquisition" basis rather than an operating projection basis. A twelve month operatiQn under the requested rate structure will produce pre-tax profits'of $232,651 in Halton City and $284,521 in North Richland Hills _ this is equivalent to $52 and $47 per basic subscriber account per year. .. .).4, .".... -:.. ~ . Revenues Basic HBO Showtime Cínemax' Movie Expanded Basic Additional Outlet Converter HBO/ST/C Additional Outlet Installation Basic'Growth Factor Total Revenues Expenses: eanChise her Operating Depreciation Lease Interest Total Expenses Net Prior FIT (Loss) FIT at Statutory Rate Net Return Earned Net Profit (Loss) Return on Plant Investment Return on Equity . 12 Month Projected Operating Results 1982 Actual vs. Projection at Revised Rates CBS/Blackhawk Cable Haltom City 12 Months Revised Rate North Rich1and Hills 1982 12 Months Actual Revised Rate 1982 Actual $ 422,790 343,254 203,148 161,772 68,796 18,533 72,735 36,060 l72,200 24,000 $ 589,968 496,242 291,042 225,726 97,110 28,928 101,517 50,322 246,240 39,000 118,207 100,074 $ 987,000 $1,641,495 $1,427,000 $2,266,169 34,000 60,180 40,000 73,567 935,000 1,027,798 1,337,000 1,439,205 235,000 251,687 349,000 372,929 l3,000 ° 20,000 0 203,000 69,179 298,000 95,947 $1,420,000 $1,408,844 $2,044,000 $1,981,648 $ (433,000) $ 232,651 $ (617,000) $ 284,521 $ (199,180) $ 107,019 $ (283,820) $ 130,880 $ (233,820) $ 125,632 $ (333,180) $ 153,641 (23.70%) 7.65% (23.35%) 6.78% 5.27% 4.34% 7.34% 6.03% Reflects Equipment Lease Liability Capitalized ,.~~ .".... . BLACK HAWK CABLE CORP. UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEr-rENTS (Dollars in'Thousands) 1982 NORTH RICHLA~ID HILLS Prior Owner CBS JAN. 1 - JUNE 15 JUNE 16 - DEC. 31st REVENUE Primary $ 193 245 Pay 412 486 Secondary 23 27 Installation 14 25 Other 0 2 TOTAL REVENUE 642 785 EXPEÞ1SES Pay Programming 227 242 Other Programming 18 28 . Local origination 6 11 Engineering 101 145 Sales 41 87 General & Administrative 194 237 Franchise Fees 17 23 TOTAL OPEP~TING EXPENSES 604 773 OPERATING PROFIT/(LOSS) 38 12 NON-OPERATING EXPENSES nepreciation/ft~ort 152 197 Lease 20 NA* Interest 248 50 TOTAL NON-OPERATING EXPENSES 420 247 TOT^L EXPENSES 1,024 ~020 1) J? E - 'rA X J) R 0 F' I T / ( LOS S ) ( 382) C 235) * Lease capitalized and depreciated. . .. ')4'. ~ ...- ~\ FULL YEAR 1982 438 898 50 39 2 1,427 469 46 17 246 128 431 40 1,377 50 349 20 298 667 2,044 ( 617) . . . , . Dd ~ .:. .' .,>' L ,\ 1= ). , ~.~ . . CBS/BLACK HAWK CABLE CORP. Balance Sheet 12/31/82, Assets: Cash and Equivalents Accounts Receivable (Net) Other Current Assets Property, Plant & Equipment (Net Depreciation) Total Assets Liabilities: Accounts Payable Equipment Lease Liabilities Owners Equity North Richland' Hills Total North $ 22,887 27,280 22,415 $ 45,798 75,679 63,604 3,430,908 9,735,038 $3,503,490 $9,920,119 $ 200,973 832,704 2,469,813 $ 571,444 2,362,871 6,985,804 Total Liabilities/Owner's Equity $3,503,490 $9,920,119 NOTE: Property, Plant and Equipment includes items located in North Richland Hills plus an allocation of headend and microwave equipment necessary for system operation. This statement includes no intangible assets or aS$et revaluation. -- .'~, t-"':''''; . . . CBS/BLACK HAWK CABLE CORP. SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF FUNDS June 15, 1982 - December 31, 1982 (Dollars in Thousands) North Richland Hills Source of Funds Income Before Taxes Depreciation $(235) $ 197 $( 38) Total Application of Funds Change in Working Capital Capital Expenditures Reduction in Lease Liability $( 35) $ 60 $ 73 $ 98 $ (136) Total Net Funds Generated/(Required) . ~. t~" '" c Total North $(704) $ 558 $ (146) $(103) $ 169 $ 207 $ 273 $(419) Of , , ,. . CBS/BLACK HAWK 1981 & 1982 Year End Subscriber Accounts BASIC MOVIE EXPANDED SUBS HBO SHOWTIME CINE~fAX CHANNEL BASIC North Rich1and Hills 1981 5,295 ,4,253 3,053 2,957 652 1982 5,784 4,353 2,553 2,213 830 487 . . . ')0(. ~, _. E ~ . NE\v & OLD RATES NORTH RICHLAND HILLS YEAR-END ANNUAL ANNUAL SERVICE /I SUBS OLD RATES REVENUES NEW RATES REVENUES NET CHANGE Basic 5,784 $6.50 $451,152 $8.50 $589,968 $138,816 HBO 4,353 $7.50 $391,770 $9.50 $496,242 $104,472 Showtime 2,553 $7.50 $229,770 $9.50 $291,042 $61,272 Cinemax 2,213 $6.50 $172,614 $8.50 $225,726 $53,112 Additional Outlet 2,603 $1.50 $46,854 $3.25 $101,517 $54,663 Converter Charge 8,387 $0.00 0 $0.50 $50,322 $50,322 NOTE: Annual Revenues = 1982 Year end subs x 12 months x old rates. These . numbers do not reflect actual revenues. . . ~: ," ~. . . . ., .. REVENUE EXPENSES Pay Programming All Other Operating Expenses Non-Operating Expenses F FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BLACK HAWK CABLE CORP. JANUARY 1, 1982 - JUNE IS, 1982 REVENUE/EXPENSE ALLOCATION ASSUMPTIONS Revenue figures were available by city from the general ledger. No allocations were necessary. Pay programming expenses were classified in the June 15, 1982 General Ledger as ~¡orth and South only. Allocations between cities were made on the basis of pay programming expenses as a percent of total pay programming expenses at December 31, 1982 per CBS/Black Hawk records. All other operating expenses were classified in the june 15, 1982 General Ledger as North, South or Corporate. Allocations between cities were made on the basis of average city subscriber count as a percentage of average total Black Hawk subscribers for the period January 1, 1982 and June IS, 1982. Non-operating expenses (depreciation, amortization, lease payments and interest charges) were detailed in the June 15, 1982 General Ledger as North, South or Corporate. Allocations between cities were made on the basis of city-specific assets as a percentage of total CBS/Black Hawk assets at December 31, 1982 per CBS records. .~. ",,<, "'0<. __ . . . . I " ;.. \ . FI CBS/BLACK HAWK CABLE 12/31/82 ESTI~~TED BALANCE SHEET BY FRANCHISE ALLOCATION BASIS The Balance Sheet as of 12/31/82 is a proforma Balance Sheet. The actual closing process for the acquisition of the Black Hawk System by CBS was completed in January 1983. Balance Sheet Account Method of Allocation CASH: Number of subscribers within the region (North, South). CASH EQUIVALENTS: $10,000 = performance bond in North Richland Iii lIs RECEIVABLES & RELATED Al,LOi'¡AtlCE: Number of subscribers of each franchise to total subscribers PREPAID EXPENSES: Ratio of P.P.E. cost of each franchise to P.P.E. cost of the CBS/Black Hawk System. PROPERTY PLANT & EQUIPMENT: (P.P.E) Include~ items located in each franchise area plus an allocation of cost of Head end, Microwave and Other equipment necessary for system operation. The depreciation expense is allocated in the ratio of P.P.E. cost of each franchise to the P.P.E. cost of the CBS/Blackhawk system. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: Based on the ratio of total assets of each franchise to the total assets of CBS/Black Hawk. MIOUNTS DUE AFTER Ot\Tf: (1) YEAR: Obligations for capital leases and purchase option are allocated in the ratio of P.P.E. cost of each franchise to P.P.E. cost of the CBS/Black Hawk system. Balance Sheet as of June 15, 1982 (used in the Preparation of "Sources and Applications of Funds") is primarily based on the Statement of.Adjustment Assets and Adjustment Liabilities as of that date as prepared by Coopers & Lybrand, Certified Public Accountants. . ~: ~""', .... t . . . ,. City of J(8rth Richland Hills, Texas I~' li\, ~ i! \ /., ~=;~~*~~~i. _:~~ --~ r~~ - '~ TO: Rodger Line City Manager DATE: June 23, 1983 FROM: Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Zoning Cases to be heard by Council June 27, 1983 PZ 83-35 APPROVED (4 were contacted) Request of Dan J. Anderson, D.V.M. to rezone a portion of Tract 10F, Thomas Peck Survey, Abstract 1210, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of Commercial. This property is located on the west side of Davis Blvd. approximately 600 feet north of the intersection of Shady Grove Road and Davis Blvd. PZ 83-36 APPROVED (11 were contacted) Request of P & S Construction Company to rezone Tract 13A, Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, and a portion of Lot 4 and Lots 5 thru 7, Block 1, Meadowview Estates, from their present classification of Agriculture, IF-12 and IF-9 to proposed classifications of 1F-8-1600 and 1F-8-1800-0ne Family Dwellings. This property is located on the north side of Rumfield Road, extends approximately 1,090 feet and is approximately 666 feet east of Davis Blvd. (817) 281-G041n301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TX 76118 ~ . Page 2 PZ 83-37 APPROVED (45 were contacted) Request of Dominion Properties, Inc. to rezone Tracts 7E,7F, & 7K, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of 1F-8-1400 One Family Dwellings. This property is located on the north side of Martin Road, bounded on the west and north by Glenann Addition, and is approximately 800 feet west of Crane Road. PZ 83-40 APPROVED (59 were contacted) Request of Frank Kimmell, Trustee to rezone Tracts 12 & 12A, John Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, and Tract 2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from their present classification of Agriculture to proposed classifications of 1F-9-1500, 1F-8-14QO, and 1F-8-1200-0ne Family Dwellings. This property is located on the south side of Chapman Road and bounded on the west by Richfield Park. . PZ 83-41 APPROVED (no one contacted) Request of Folsom Investments, Inc. to rezone 1.44 acres out of Lot 1, Block 1, Walkers Branch Addition, from the present classification of Multi-Family to a proposed classification of Local Retail. This property is located approximately 150 feet northwest of Highway 26 on Emerald Hills Way. . To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records j DATE: June 23, 1983 , , .SUBJEcr :, PZ 83-35 Zoning request for a portion of Tract lOF, T. 'Peck Survey, Abstract 1210 from Agriculture to Commercial DEPARTMENT : Planning and Zoning. BACKGROUND: This property is located on the west side of Davis Blvd.. approximately 600 feet north of the intersect~on of Shady Grove Road and Davis Blvd. Dr. Ånderson wants to have an animal clinic on this' property. He'said he plans to use the existing build ing for the large animal clinic and build a f.irst class Small animal clinic. Dr. Anderson stated there would be no outside runs and none will be' kept' oye~night. There were 4 .property owners contacted, but no one objected to the request. ·The Planning and Zoning. Commission recommended approval of this request.. ø CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning r~quest. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: N / A , ~~ (l~ -~--~-~~~-~-~-~~---~-~~~~--~~~----~-~-~-~~~~~-~---~-~~~~-~~~-~~--~~---~~~~---------~~-~---- ", .:, -' Page 15 ( \ -:.-. P & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 . PZ 83-15 DENIED ( RECESS The Chairman MS. Nash ~ade the motion to deny PZ 83-15. This motion was secon Mr. Bowen and the motion to d carried 5-0. BACK TO ORDER.· Chairman Tuck, calle9 the meeting back to or at 9:17 P. M. Commiss· Member, Mark Wood, had to leav ~so Alternate John Schwinger will take his place. 7. PZ 83-16 WITHDRA~lN Request of James Rust to rezone Tracts 3B3 and 3B7, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their present classification of Multi-Family to proposed classifications of Multi-Family-Specific Use-Quads and 2F-9-Duplexes. This property is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road at the intersection of Precinct Line Road and Toni Drive (City of Hurst). Mr. Rust withdrew his request. \ " 8. PZ 83-35 Request of Dan J. Anderson, D.V.M. to rezone a portion of Tract 10Ft Thomas Peck Survey, Abstract 1210, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of Commercial. This property is located on the west side of Davis Blvd., approximately 600.feet north of the intersection of Shady Grove Road and Davis Blvd. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward: - Thomas Elting came forward to represent Dr. Anderson, a well known veterinarian. He said he has owned and operated Haltom City Animal Clinic for 38 years. Mr. Elting said the property in question located on Highway #1938 approximately 600 feet Northeast of Shady Grove Road. He said he felt this property would conducive for the type of zoning they are requesting. . ø - Page 16 p & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 PZ 83-35 APPROVED 9. PZ 83-36 ( \. ( Mr. Elting said this proposed animal clinic will be a large animal clinic utilizing an existing building structure on the property. He said they also plan to build a first class small animal clinic in conjunction with that. Mr. Elting said all animals in the clinic will be housed under environmental conditions to meet all the codes and requirements of t~e State and local codes. He said there will be no outside runs for the small animals, none on that particular property will be kept overnight. Mr. Elting said they plan to landscape the area and build the type of building that would attract the proper class clientele. He said approximately $150,000 will be spent toward improvements; the property now is open land with a house and stock tank. Mr. Elting said the "commercial_.zoning" would be from the house South. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request-to please come forward._ Arnold Pair, 8517 Davis Blvd., came forward. He said he lives directly West of this property. Mr. Pair said he had been against this request, but after speaking with, Dr. Anderson who assured him there would be no outside keeping of animals, he would like to clarify that he has no objection to this request. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 83-35. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. . - . - . - - -~- Request S Construe · to rezone T tephen son Survey, Abstract 1266, and a portion of Lot 4 and Lots 5 thru 7, Block 1, Meadowview Estates, from . ø - . ~ . c c. KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas May 19, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-35, AG. TO COMM., GRID 17 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~ RWA :mh cc: . Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 . . . ORDINANCE NO. {ü3Co AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-35 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to Commercial. BEING 1.69 acres out of the T. Peck Survey, Abstract 1209, in Tarrant County, Texas and described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in west line of Highway #1938 said point being 1,309.08 feet South and 1,227.1 feet West of Northeast corner of said Peck Survey; THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes West 308.22 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 0 degrees 20 minutes West 490.63 feet to a point for corner in the West line of Highway #1938. THENCE with said West line of Highway #1938, North 30 degrees 55 minutes Easi 185 feet, North 32 degrees 11 minutes East 175 feet, North 33 degrees 50 minutes East 178.66 feet, North 34 degrees, 47 minutes East 40.89 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1.69 acres of land. Page 2 This property is located on the west side of Davis Boulevard. approximately 600 feet north of the intersection of Shady Grove Road and Davis Boulevard. . APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF MAY. 1983. .~¿rC ~r CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-83-35 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .. " . . DATE: June 23. 1983 . SUBJECT ~ PZ 83-36 Zonini request on Tract 13A. S.Richardson Survey. Abstract 1266. & a ,portion of. Lot 4 & Lots 5-7, Blk. 1, Meadowview Estates, from AG, IF-12, & IF-9 to IF-8-] 600 ~nd IF-8-1800. DEP ARTMENT : ~la~ning and Zoning. BACKGROUND: This property is located north of Rumfie1d Rd., extends approximately 1090 north and is approximately 666 feet east of Davis Blvd. P &, S Construction want to change th'e lot size but keep the homes "large, and the 5 acre tract , ' presently zoned Agriculture has an unsightly house on it wh~ch they plan to' do away with. Mr. Parish said they would deed restrict Lots 17,,18, & 19, BIk. 1., to a'minimum of 2000 sq. ft. There were eleven property, owners contacted, bu't no one obj ected to this request. 4IÞ 7he Planning and Zoning.Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of Zoning r~quest. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A , --2/~ Œ~ ~~--~--~~-~-~-~~--~--~~-~--~-~--~--~-~-~~---~~~~--~-~-~-~-~~-~-----~~-~----~-~-~~-~~~~~-~~~ . -. .. ... Page 16 p & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 , Mr. Elting said this proposed animal clinic will be a large animal cl~nic utilizing an existing building structure on the property. He sa~ they also plan to build a first ·ass ....: small animal clinic in conjunc.,. . on with that. Mr. Elting said animals in the clinic will under environmental cond' ons to meet all the codes and requi ments of tqe State and local codes He said there will be no outside ns for the small animals, none on at particular property will b kept overnight. . Mr. Elting id they plan to landscape the area ä build the type of buildin that would attract the proper class ientele. He said approximately $150' 00 will be spent toward i~ ovements; the property now is open nd with a house and stock tank. Mr. Elting said the "commercial zoning" would be from the house South. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request. to please come forward.~ Arnold Pair, 8517 Davis Blvd., came forward. He said he lives directly West of this property. Mr. Pair said he had been against this request, but after speaking with, Dr. Anderson who assured him there would be no outside keeping of animals, he would like to clarify that he has no objection to this request. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. PZ 83-35 APPROVED Mr. .schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 83-35. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. . ~ ~.......~~ ..................... 9. PZ 83-36 Request of P & S Construction Company to rezone Tract 13A, Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, and a portion of Lot 4 and Lots 5 thru 7, Block 1, Meadowview Estates, from . , . . "'- Page 17 p & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 their pre~ent classifications of 'Agriculture, 1F-12 and 1-F-9 to proposed classifications of IF-8-1600 and IF-8-1800-0ne Family Dwellings. This property is located on the north side of Rumfield Road, extends approximately 1,090 feet north, and is approximately 666 feet East of Davis Boulevard. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. John Parish, P & S Construction Co., came forward. He stated they have developed Meadowview Estates, Phases 1 & 2, which are next door to this property and are currently starting Phase 3. Mr. Parish said the property in question is a 5-acre tract with an old house on it, old garage with trash behind it which made it impossible to build and sell the lots on Northfield Drive. Mr. Parish said they felt they could extend Smith Drive and Ellis Drive easily and take in 12 Lots there, and i~ order to develop the next 6 Lots they needed to cut a new street and replat those on Northfield. . He said he realizes that those acres the street from Northfield now will be disappointed if this is approved, the street would dead end into Mr. Larry McWilliams house, who is a pitcher with the Pittsburg Pirates. Mr. Parish said he had tried to get word from him. He said he talked to him once and then mailed him a copy of the plat, but he has not heard from him. ·Mr. Parish said he found out Mr. McWilliams has called some of the neighbors who asked him to speak against this request. He said they will get rid of an eye sore and will give ourselves another 3 Lot depth between us and this Northeast Business , . . ~ Page 18 P & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 Park which will generally help the neighborhood. Mr. Parish said th~y had some conferences with the neighbors and have agreed to make some changes; on the 3 lots facing Rumfield Road, Lots 17, 18, and 19, Block 1. We will make a minimum of 2000 square foot homes (we will deed restrict them). He said they will also sign a contract with Mr. Kurtz that when this land is sold, it will be deed restricted to 2000 square foot homes. Mr. Parish said he knew there was a complaint from Mr. Elliott, owner of the Northeast Business Park because of the drainage easement through there and the extension of Ellis Dri~e. He said they have agreed to cul de sac Ellis Drive and feel this plan will improve the area. Mr. Parish also stated they will remove the old house and the garage. Richard Kurtz came forward. he owns the property to the the lots on Rumfield Road. asked it there wasn't a 10 easement" running along the the original plat, running South along Rumfield. He said West of Mr. Kurtz ft. . property on North and Doug Long stated there was a 10 ft. eas~ment on our side. Mr. Kurtz stated he has no objection to this as long as ·there is a contractural agreement to 2000 square foot homes on the 3 acres. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing t6 speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 83-36 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 83-36. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 5-0. . . ~ . '. . ( ( .~_. ' KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas April 27, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-36, AG., & IF-12 TO IF-B, GRID 52 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. Please note that the existing zoning of the two lots just south of Ellis Drive is IF-9 rather than IF-12, acc~rding to the zoning map~ , RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 . I. . ORDINANCE NO. r071 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 1967, AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-36 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture, IF-12, & IF-9 to IF-8-1600 and IF-8-18DD. TRACT 1 - IF-8-1600 ALL that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being $ituated in the S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being part of a 34.5 acre tract conveyed by Kate Freeman, widow to John R. McFadin and Wife, Francis Jo McFadin, as shown in deed recorded in'Volume 2075, Page 180, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by Metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 60d nail in metal disk for the southwest corner of sajd 34.5 acre tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 18 seconds East, 200.0 feet along the South line of said 34.5 acre tract to a 60d nail in metal disk; THENCE North 0 degrees 09 minutes 15 seconds West, at 22.87 feet passing the southwest corner of Block 1, Meadowview Estates as recorded in Volume 388-99, Page 59, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and continuing along the west line of Block 1, 3, and 4, a total distance of 1,089.0 feet to an existing steel rod for'the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 4, said Meadowview Estates: said point also being in the south line of a 40.0 foot wide drainage easement; THENCE South 89 degrees 35 minutes 21 seconds West, 201.37 feet along the south line of said drainage easement to an existing steel rod in the west line of said 34.5 acre tract; THENCE South 0 degrees 21 minutes 22 seconds East, 547.47 feet to an existing steel rod; THENCE South 0 degrees 05 minutes 43 seconds, 541.54 feet to the place of beginning and containing 5.002 acres of land and being the same tract as conveyed by Elbert Lindley et ux to Harrison Milo Grizzle et ux as recorded in Volume 4101, Page 549, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Page 2 TRACT 2 - 1F-8-1800 The following described tract or parcel of land be'ing a portion of Lot 4, and Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block I, Meadowview Estates, as addition to the City of North Richalnd Hills, Tarrant County, Texas according to plat recorded in 'Volume 388-99, Page 59, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of said Lot 7, Block I, Meadowview Estates; THENCE South Q degrees 09 minutes 15 seconds East, along the west line of said Block I, Meadowview Estates, a distance of 300.0 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 147.07 feet to a point in the west line of Northfield Drive; THENCE North 0 degrees 12 minutes 40, seconds along the west line of Northfield Drive a distance of 169..05 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 334.39 feet whose center bears north 89 degrees 47 minutes 20 seconds a distance of 334.39 feet; THENCE along said curve to the right and the west line of said Northfield Drive and through a central angle of 22 degrees 49 minutes 47 seconds a distance of 133.23 feet to a point in the south line of Ellis Drive. THENCE West along the south line of said Ellis Drive a distance of 173.02 feet to the place of beginning and containing 45114.555 feet or 1,0356 acres of land more or less. This property is located on the north side of Rumfield Road, extends northward approximately 1,090 feet, and is approximately 666 feet eãst of Davis Boulevard. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF MAY, 1983. ~'e-~ _ '-?; ~ SECRETARY PL ING AND'ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-83-36 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1983. MAYOR ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY DATE: June 23, 1983 .SUBJECT:, PZ 83-37 Zoning request for Tracts 7E. 7F~ & 7K. T.K. Martin Survey. Abstract 1055 from Agriculture to IF-8-l400. DEP ARTMENT : Planning and Zoning. BACKGROUND: This property is located on the north side of Martin Road, bounded on the west and north by Glenann Addition. and is approximately 800 feet west of Crane Road. There were 45 property owners contacted and there was opposition.' They were in opposition because of the small houses they plan to build, the traffic. the development would cause on Martin Road, ~1ain-Street', and Precinct Line Road. ~hey were also .concerned ~ith the drainag '·The Planning and Zoning Commission, ptated it was in the flight pattern of 'Mangham Airport, but they rec~mmended approval with the stipulation the-zoning would be IF-8-1500 instead of IF-8-1400. ." _........_._--...--~ CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: . YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A -----------------~-----------------------------------------~~--º~,-- ,", . Page 20 p & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 . . . 11. PZ 83-37 Mr. Hannon said Mr. Bronstad told them there is a drainage channel which this subdivision needs to drain in which flows to the East and is not improv ä. Mr. Long stated they are takin on that now. He said that wi Phase 3 of Meadowview Estat Mr. Hannon stated the c· y staff feels we should stipulate channel be lined before buildi permits are allowed to be on Phase 4. plan to do the Mr. Long channel. cker asked Mr. Bronstad ther to cuI de sac the and if so, what kind. M Hannon said he felt they should ave a 50 foot R.O.W. to the property line and also put in the cuT de sac bubble so it will have essentially a circle with a 50 foot street. Mr. Long said they could slide ~he street dedication over to where you would have the 50 foot R.O.W. There was discussion as to how the cuI de sac should be built. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 83-46 subject to the Engineer's comments, subject to providing a cuI de sac on Ellis Drive which provides a 50 foot R.O.W. to the Westerly property line, and further subject to the stipulation that building permits not be issued in this section for Meadowview Estates/until the concrete lined drainage ditch is constructed and accepted by the city. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Dominion Properties Inc. to rezone Tracts 7E, 7F, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their present classification of Agriculture Page 21 P & Z Minutes ~ay 26, 1983 . to a proposed classification of IF-8-140Q-One Family Dwellings. This property is located on the North side of Martin Road, bounded on the West and North by GlenAnn Addition, and is approximately 800 feet West of Crane Road. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this to speak in favor of this request to please come ,forward. Gordon Swift, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Weldon Ward and Dominion Properties. He said they are requesting this zoning f~r .the extension of GlenAnn Addition and have the preliminary plat as the next item on the agenda. Mr. Swift stated they feel this property should be fo~ residential usage. . The chairman called for others wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being none, the Chairman called for tþose wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Bonnie Washburn, 6451 Chilton, came forward. She asked if they plan to build 1400 square feet. Chairman Tucker stated they can build larger, but the minimum would be 1400 square feet. Ms. Washburn said her home which abuts this property is 2130 square feet and the others are 1800 square feet or larger. She said Martin Road is a very bad street; how is it going to handle the traffic; and Main Street can not handle anymore either. . Ms. Washburn said she is an employee of the city of Hurst and works real close with the engineering department. She said she believes North Richland Hills and the city of Hurst did a traffic study on Precinct Line Rd. Page 22 P & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 . and you should know the results o"f the study of how bad Precinct Line Road needs to be developed and also how Martin Road needs to be developed . She, asked how would Martin Road handle this added development. Chairmen Tucker said this Commission has to make the decidion of what is the best use for the land. He said streets out in the country will not be improved without development and "growth. Ms. Washburn said she is not opposed to single family dwellings, but she is opposed to any houses smaller than 160Q'to 1700 square feet, to keep her property and those around her from depreciating since their's are much larger. . Chairman Tucker asked Ms. Washburn if he house was 2130 including"the garage. Ms. Washburn said it was 2130 square feet of heated area. Chairman Tucker asked Mr. Bronstad about the zoning in that area. Mr. Bronstad said the homes from Amundson East to the creek was to be 1600 square feet and from the creek East to Crane Road was to be 1500 square feet. Chairman Tucker said the houses which back up to this property is zoned for a minimum of 1500 to 1600 square feet. Mr. Bronstad said that was correct. . James Robinson, 6463 Chilton, came forward. He asked about the lot size, they look very small and it would restrict the developer to not be able to build a very large house. Chairman Tucker stated building homes on large lots are things of the past whether we like it or not. He said it . . . .~. Page 23 P & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 it benefits the developer to build large houses on smaller lots. Gerald Stewart came forward. He asked what size homes does the builder plan to build. Chairman Tucker said they have not stated what size homes they plan to build, he felt it would be up to the market as to what size he builds. Charles McNay came forward. He said his property backs up to this property and he was wandering if there would be any protection from drainage if this project is approved, for the homes which are already there. Chairman Tucker stated they would have protection. He said that is taken care of in the platting process; it will be carefully studied by the City Engineer and the City Staff. Paul Parker, 6459 Chilton, came forward. He said he lives next door to this property and he had bee? against this request, but after talking with Gordon Swift, he is in favor of this request except for one thing, opening up Chilton to Martin. He said the whole GlenAnn Addition will be dumped right down Chilton. Mr. Parker said his main concern was the traffic pattern. Chairman Tucker asked the owner of the property if he would object to changing the zoning request to 1500 square foot minimum to conform to the present zoning of Glenann Addition. Mr. Tad Adcock said that would be no problem. The Chairman closed the Public Hearing. . . . Page 24 ., P & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 PZB3-37 APPROVED .. Mr. Hannon said he would like to state, for the record, that this Commission has considered previous case for zoning in this area, along the flight pattern of Mangham Airport and it was the decision of this Commission to deny residential zoning within the flight path of the airport, but it was overruled by the City Council. He said he still felt the Commission should take this location into consideration as being a hazard to the people in this area. Ms. Nash asked how far it was from the airport. Mr. Swift said he believed it was in excess of 2,000 feet. Ms. Nash asked if this property was in the flight path. Mr. Swift said it was off the runway. Mr. Bowen stated the City Engineer stated in his letter regarding the platting of this property that it lies 2,000 feet north of the north-south runTWay. Mr. Hannon also stated the ground slopes down in that direction, making the planes come rather close to the houses. Mr. Swift stated he talked with the City Attorney, Rex McEntire, before he accepted this case. He said it was only after Mr. McEntire informed him that the City had no right to deny the use of this property, that he accepted this case. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PZ 83-27 with the stipulation being IF-8-1500. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. . . . .., c~ c KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas Apri 1 27, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-37, AG TO IF-8, GRID 80 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map sh~uld it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. \ RWA/l jc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 · ORDINANCE NO. ~() ~t AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, ,PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMM¡SSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that 9n Case No. PZ-83-37 the following described property 'shall be rezoned from Agriculture to 1F-8-~ '1500 · Being a 13.21 acre tract situated in the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin at the northeast corner of Lot 7, Block 8 oj the Glenann Addition as recorded in Volume 388-82, Page 42 of the Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes east, 881.75 feet; THENCE South ,. degrees 2'6 minutes 15 seconds east, 656.17 feet; THENCE North 89 degrees 58 minutes west, 2'8.71 feet; THENCE North 89 degrees 44 minutes II seconds west, 393.88 feet; THENCE North 84 degrees 51 minutes 45 seconds west, 284.'7 feet; THENCE North II degrees .6 minutes 51 seconds west, 629.31 feet to the point of beginning and containing 13.21 acres, more or less. · Page 2 This property is located on the north side of Martin Road, bounded on the west and north by Glenann Addition, and is approximately 800 feet west of Crane Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF MAY, 1983. ¿£J~c ~r CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7J7 ~'ff;t>~ (Çif! ~ ~ SECRETARY PL ING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-83-37 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE: June 23, 1983 . SUBJECT :, PZ 83-40 Zoning request for Tracts 12 & l2A. J. Barlough SUrVey. Abstract 130, and Tract 2.~ Wm. Mann Survey. Abstract 1010. from Agriculture to IF-9-1500. IF-8-1400 and IF-8-l200: DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning. BACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Chapman Road and boundP.d on the.- west by Richfield ParK. There were 59 DrODertv owners cont~cted and there were people there in opposition.' Mr. K~e1l wishes to zone the property along Chapm~n Road IF-9-l500, alon~ the southwest corner which joins North Pa~k Estates~ he wishes to zonelF-8-1400~ and the remainder of the 67 acres ,IF-8-1200. Mr. Kimmell did say he would agree to changing this to IF-8-1300. . -There was' much concern about the traffic and drainage. The houses will have driveways on Chapman Road causing them to have to back out onto that congested- street.· It was also stated that Chapman Road was full of chug holes and floods every time it rains. The Planni~i and Zonini ·Commission recommended approval of this request with the stip~ion that the change be made from IF-a-l200 to IF-8-l300. CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of Zoning req.u.e...st. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A -------------------------------------------------------------~~:_~~----_.- . . . . Page 31 P & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 ~~~~"~y.#"#~~'~~' / ./ , PZ 83-39 DENIED 15. PZ 83-40 .. family zoning, the question about the drainage and they said th alleviate the-drainage problem. ~. Larriviere stated with the adde~ development he would be floode'cf~ Mr. Larriviere stated there are~ur places within a half mil~/~(hat already is zoned multi-family; at Smithfield and Starnes, Davis atp~ewman, Watauga and Smithfield Roa~/;and Chapman and Little Ranch Roa(t¡~ Mr. Larriviere stated with al~,...these, what next, how much more muLt~-family? "t>' ./y Mr. Larriyîere stated he thought the . ' reason¡fl,tñe City Council turned the prev~dùs request down was because of th~~~ewerage problem, the traffic, and S~ flooding conditions; those condi- ~lttions are still there. ø~ Chairman Tucker closed the Public ~ Hearing. . ~. tf~ / ,/ ;! ,It- ,,'" "l' I Mr. Hannon asked Mr. Bronstad about the Water Master Plan. He said it shows a 24 inch water line going across the back of this property and asked what was scheduled on this; what is the priority? Mr. Bronstad stated he was not sure of priority, but they were waiting for the City Council to give them the go ahead. Mr. Schubert made the motion to deny PZ 83-39. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion to deny carried 4~1, with Mr. Hannon voting against denial. Request of Frank Kimmell, Trustee to rezone Tracts 12 & 12A, John Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, and Tract 2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from their present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classifica- tion of IF-9-1500, IF-8-1400 and IF-8- 1200-0ne Family Dwellings. This property is located on the south side of Chapman Road and bounded on the west by Richfield Park. Page 32 P & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 . Mr. Hannon stated that due to a conflict of interest, he would like to step down. Mr.· Frank Kimmell, Co-Owner of Richland Land Company, came forward. Mr. Kimmell stated that this request was for approximately 67 acres on Chapman Drive. . Mr. Kimmell stated that immediately east of this tract the property was undeveloped, but was zoned 2F-9; at the southeast corner the property was zoned commercial; the property to the south was zoned industrial, but undeveloped; and the acres to the southwest is North Park Estates, which is zoned IF-7; the property to the west is Richfield Park with Agricul- tural zoning; the property to the west of Richfield Park was developed and zoned IF-7; the other areas to the west of this property is zoned IF-12; the properties to the north and northeast are undeveloped and are zoned Agricultural; and the northeast corner is McComas Addition, which is developed and is zoned IF-9. Mr. Kimmell stated their zoning request covers three different levels, on Chapman Road they are asking for IF-9 zoning with 1.500 square foot minimums. Mr. Kimmell stated according to the tax records, 92% of the existing homes in McComas Addition are under 1,600 square feet. Mr. Kimmell stated they felt the IF-9 zoning was a good transitional zoning between the development to the north and their proposed development to the south. . Mr. Kimmell stated where their property joins North Park Estates they are requesting IF-8-1400. Mr. Kimmell stated they are requesting a higher zoning than North Park and that the tax rolls show 95% of the homes in North Park are u.nder 1,500 square feet. Page 33 P & Z Minutes l1aY 26, 1983 . Mr. Kimmell stated that they were requesting 1F-8 zoning for the balance of their tract, which is equal to, or better than all the other residential zonings, as far to the west as Rufe Snow Drive, as far south as Watauga Drive and as far to the east as Smithfield Road. Mr. Kimmell stated they feel they are compatible to the zoning in the area. Mr. Kimmell stated that there had been some discussion of a north-south collector street in this general area. He stated they are proposing to plat Fox Hollow Lane a 60 foot width which could be used as a collector street if the City so desired. Mr. Kimmell stated they could make either F9X Hollow Lane or Little Ranch Road as the collector street on the final plat. , Mr. Kimmell stated that in North Park Estates there was a Y-inlet in which most of this 67 acre tract drains into. Mr. Kimmell stated their drainage and storm sewer plans would divert that run off to a series of sewers existing out of these cul-de-sacs into the creek that is in the park area. Mr. Kimmell stated he had visited with the City Staff and they see no problem with this. He stated this should alleviate the flooding in this area. Mr. Kimmell stated they had only four lots in their proposed development that would continue to drain into 'that Y-inlet. . Mr. Kimmell stated they felt the zoning they were requesting was complimentary to the existing development in the area and requested approval of this request. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. . Page 34 p & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 . Mr. Owen Long came forward. Mr. Long stated he owned the property to the south of this property, which was presently zoned industrial. Mr. Long stated he planned to come in at a later date and vacate the plat of Fox Hollow Addition. He stated he had no real concern with the proposed development to the north of them. Mr. Long stated he was doing the engineering on this and it would be submitted next month. Mr. Long stated there would be a concrete lined channel thru this property, and it would be on the Planning and Zoning's next agenda. Mr. Long stated they planned to realien and restructure that drainage ditch. . Mr. Long stated Fox Hol¡ow Lane could be a collector street, they have had a box culvert at the railroad and had been paid for for eight or nine years, so it would not be hard to made Fox Hollow Lane a collector street. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Mr. Ted Gay, 6440 Sudbury Way, came forward. Mr. Gay stated he was not against the development; however, the traffic needs to be addressed. Mr. Gay stated with the construction of Rufe Snow, it mades the traffic more congested and if they had a north south route, they were going to have a lot of traffic down Little Ranch and will cause problems getting on Watauga Road. Mr. Gay stated he would like to request this zoning be denied until a traffic pattern was worked out,and try to get this Fox Hollow Lane tied down more. . Mr. Tom Ferruggia, 6448 Sudbury Way, came forward. Mr. Ferruggia stated he had had flooding at his house for several years. He stated he had Page 35 p & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 . called the City to see if they could do anything about it; the City said they did not own the land and could not, do anything about it. Mr. Ferrugigia stated he had had to open his gate in his back yard and let out 3~ feet of water. Mr. Ferruggia stated he was in agreement of the development of this land, but he requested that they insure that the land will drain correctly. Mr. Ferruggia stated his other concern was in regard to square footage. He stated his house was approximately 1,585 square feet and asked what the proposed zoning would be next to him. Chairman Tucker said it would be 1,400 square feet. . Mr. Ferruggia said he had his house up for sale earlier this year, but took it off the market. Mr. Fertuggia stated he may try to sell it again and would not want anything to hinder the market value of his property. Mr. Ferruggia stated he would request to increase them a 100 feet or so. Mr. Calvin McKutchin came forward. Mr. McKutchin stated he lived on Sudbury Way. Mr. McKutchin stated he wanted to reiterate what the previous gentlemen had said about the traffic and the flooding problems. He stated he would request they made sure that Fox Hollow Lane is made a collector street and also that the property drains properly. Mr. Dan Patterson, 6445 Sudbury Way, came forward. Mr. Patterson asked what was in the Master Plan in regard to Little Ranch Road or Fox Hollow Lane to alleviate the traffic congestion. . Mr. Bronstad stated they have been taling about Conett Blvd. for several years, but don't know when the Council will approve the work on Watauga Road, they have not set a target date ye~. Page 36 P & Z Mînutes May 26, 1983 . Mr. Bronstad stated right now they are working on Phase II of Rufe Snow Drive. Chairman Tucker said there is both an east-west and a north-south thoroughfare in the Master Plan, but that is all the information he has to give; it is up to the Council to put them into the fiscal year's budget and fund those plans. Mr. Patterson said he felt they are getting the cart ahead of the horse, and that we need the streets now before the development. Chairman Tucker said it takes time to build streets. . Mr. Kimmell stated their plans now are to develop in four phases. He stated when Little Ranch Road is opened up to Chapman Drive, it would give these people in North Park another outlet. Chairman Tucker asked what his projection of time was. Mr. Kimmell said about two years. A man living at 7235 Sandhurst came forward. He stated he was against Little Ranch Road being made a thoroughfare. He stated unless you releave the traffic problem on Watauga Road and Rufe Snow, you are still going to have a problem. He stated his only concern about this develop- ment was the traffic, getting in and out of the area. Mr. Roy Hodo, 6724 Mabell, came forward. Mr. Rodo asked if the green area shown was for 1,500 square foot homes. Mr. Kimmell stated it was. . Mr. Rodo asked where the drive approaches would be. Page 37 p & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 . Mr. Kimmell stated they would be off Chapman Road. Mr. Hodo said Chapman Road is unbearable at its best and now this plan is to have cars backing out onto Chapman Road. He stated the street is full of chug holes; when it rains Chapman Road floods, and nothing has been addressed about this problem. Mr. Hodo said when you add this many houses you have not provided any exits to get out of the area; you will just be congesting the area more. Mr. Hodo stated he understands the streets are the City Council's problem, but if the City Council is not meeting the needs of providing entrances and exits of the area. . Chairman Tucker said he wanted to explain that in a zoning request, we consider the best use' of the land and we get to the next request, the platting, that is when the roads, the drainage, and how the cars drive in and out will be discussed. He stated we can give them the zoning and deny the plat if the roads are not laid out properly or the drainage is not sufficient. Mr. Hodo stated he would wait for the platting request. Mr. Hodo asked if this area was in the flood plane. Chairman Tucker said it was not. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. o . Mr. Bowen stated he was concerned about square footage. Mr. Bowen stated he understood the need for smaller lots, but he was concerned about the number of 1,200 square foot homes. Mr. Bowen asked if they would be willing to change their ratio some. He stated he would be able to think more favorable on this if it was more proportional. Page 38 p & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 . Mr. Kimmell stated he had no objection to working out a compromise. He stated he would prefer the 1,200, square feet, but he would be willing to change his proposed 1,200 to 1,300 square feet for the entire addition. PZ 83-40 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 83-40 with the stipulation that a change be made in the request from IF-8-1200 to IF-8-1300. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. RECESS The Chairman called P.M. r .L V.~fP'"'""- ---~-It.r ,-.--..-....-- -~ . BACK TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 11:30 P.M. with t~ same members ,present. ¿. r' 16. PS83-44 Request of F~ank Kimme1J.Árustee, for preliminary plat of Chapman Ridge Addi tion. /' It~ . ,i'.~~ ' Mr. Kimmell cam~forward. Mr. Kimmell stated he had~~ceived the City Engineer's ~équests and had responded to these i¿~ms. Mr. Kimmell said H' Items 1 /.fhru' 4 had been agreed to and have Qé~n added to the drawing; reg~ing item #5, he met with the ~. owñ'er of the property to the east, ".~' ~urk C~llins, the proposed Central ~~ Park Addition, to confirm that he had ~;~ no objection to the concentrated storm rÇ water discharge point as sho~ on the ~ drainage layout. He stated they felt I' they could reach a satisfactory " conclusion. Mr. Kimmell stated one /A alternative, if all else failed, was to take the drainage out of the / easterly cul-de-sacs down the east side of the property into the drainage ¿. /' easement. He stated Mr. Hannon /.? addressed that more clearly in his letter to you dated May 25th. .. Mr. Kimmell said on item #6, they had made that change; #7 regarding the grading on the proposed Priddy Lane, that he said it could possibly be too flat, but when we do the final engineering, if it is too flat, we will meet the City's criteria. ~~~~~ " ' .. ,. . . c ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas April 27, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-40, AG TO IF-9 & IF-8, GRID 77, 78, 86, 87 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and. find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. M-W. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 4 ORDINANCE NO. (D ~i AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-40 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to 1F-9-1500, IF-8~ and 1F-8-~. I~'{)Ð [~'Õ\) . 1F-9-1500 Being a tract of land out of the William L. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, and the John Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, and situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: - · BEGINNING at a spike in'the asphalt pavement of County Road No. 3036 (Chapman Road), said spike being the northwest corner of a 33.4235 acre tract as described in a deed to Ina Eloise A¡len and Walter Pearl He~ry, Jr., recorded in'Volume 6892, Page 1112 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; said corner bears South 89 'degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds West and 905.30 feet from the northeast corner of said William L. Mann Survey;, THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds along the north boundary line of said Allen and Henry tract and the center line of County Road No. 3036 (Chapman Road) for a distance of 1988.48 feet to a spike in the asphalt pavement and being the northeast corner of a 33.4235 acre tract conveyed to Irvin McAlester by deed recorded in Volume 4102, Page 243 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 03 minutes 47 seconds East along the east boundary line of said McAlester tract for a distance of 165.98 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds for a distance of 1989.18 feet to a point in the west boundary line of said Allen and Henry tract; . THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 42 seconds East along said west boundary line for a distance of 165.99 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING. Page 2 IF-8-1400 Being a tract of land out- of the William L. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010 and situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a spike in the asphalt pavement of County Road No. 3036 (Chapman Road), said spike being the northwest corner of a 33.4235 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Ina Eloise Allen and Walter Pearl Henry, Jr., recorded in Volume 6892, Page 1112 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas: THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 42 seconds West along the west boundary line of said Allen and Henry tract 998.00 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE South 89 degrees 49 minutes 18 seconds East for a distance of 146.99 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 42 seconds West for a distance of 261.89 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds East for a distance of 791.04 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 33 minutes 08 seconds West for a distance of 156.31 feet to a point in the south boundary line of said Allen and Henry tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 44 minutes 58 seconds West along said south boundary line for a distance of 937.00 feet to the southwest corner of said tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 42 second~ East along the east boundary of said tract for a distance of 417.00 feet to the point of beginning. IF-8-1200 Being a tract of land out of the William L. Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1010 .and in the John Barlough Survey, Abstract No. 130 and situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a spike in the asphalt pavement of County Road No. 3036 (Chapman Road), said spike being the northwest corner of a 33.4235 acre tract of land to Ina Eloise Allen and Walter Pearl Henry, Jr. by deed recorded in Volume 6892, Page 1112 of the deed records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 42 seconds West along the west boundary line of said Allen and Henry tract for a distance of 165.99 feet to the point of beginning of the following described tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds East for a distance of 1989.18 feet to a point in the most easterly east boundary line of a 33.4235 acre tract of land to Irvin McAlester by deed recorded in Volume 4102, Page 243 of .the deed records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 03 minutes 47 seconds East along said boundary line for a distance of 42.35 feet to a reentrant corner of said McAlester tract; Page 3 4 THENCE North 89 degrees 48 minutes 05 seconds East along the north boundary line of said tract for a distance of 83.33 feet to' the most southerly northeast corner of said McAlester tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 33 minutes 08 seconds West along the east boundary line of said tract 1209.47 feet to its southeast corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 35 minutes 08 seconds West along the south boundary line of said McAlester tract for a distance of 1037.04 feet to the common corner of said McAlester tract and the aforesaid Allen and Henry tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 44 minutes 58 seconds West along the south boundary line of said Allen and Henry tract for a distance of 90.74 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 33 minutes 08 seconds East for a distance of 156.31 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds West for a distance of 791.04 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 42 seconds East for a distance of 261..89 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 49 minutes 18 seconds West for a distance of 146.99 feet to a point in the west boundary line of said Allen and Henry. tract; , . THENCE North 00 degrees. 10 minutes 42 seconds East along said west boundary line for a distance of 832.01 feet to the point of beginning. This property is located on the south side of Chapman Road and bounded on the west by Richfield Park. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF MAY, 1983. &~ C h~tr' ~.., CRA. .IRMAN PANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION t/?l ~ß~ bj: <-;J¡~ SECRETARY P~NG AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-83-40 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1983. MAYOR ATTEST: . JEANETTE MpORE, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY "¡ ~ DATE: June 23. 1983 ~UBJECT' PZ 83-41 Zoning request for 1.44 acres out of Lot 1, Block 1, Walkers Branch Addition, f~om Multi-Family to Local Retail. (1 . DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning . BACKGROUND: This property is located approximately 150 feet northwest of Highway 26 on Emerald Hill Way. Folsom Investements" Inc. wishes to straighten up the lines of the zoning and it would also give them a more usable size tract. There were no property owners contacted since they .own the property within. 2.00 feet. The Planning ,and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. . ----_.._.~'..-................ -~ . ---- --.-. .-....- CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning r~Quest. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A .¿í~ ~ -~-~~--~~~~~----~~~~---~-~~~-~~~-~-~~~~--~-~~~---~~-~-~----~~~~~-~~-~~~~~--~-~~~--~~-~~~_:~~ . Page 40 P & Z Minutes May 26, 1983 - 17. PZ 83-41 Request of Folsom Investment, Inc. to rezone 1.44 acres out of Lot 1, , Block 1, Walkers Branch Addition from their present classification of Multi- Family to a proposed classification of Local Retail. This property is located approximately 150 feet north-west of Highway 26 on Emerald Hills Way. . Mr. Bobby McMillan, with Folsom Inc., Inc., came forward. Mr. McMillan stated that two years ago when they presented the final plat of this property, there was discussion by the Commission as to the zoning lines and how they occurred. Mr. McMillan stated he had often wondered that also. He presented a plat showing the two zonings and their boundary lines. Mr. McMillan stated they wishe~ to change the zoning on 1.44 acres of land from Multi-Family to Local Retail to straighten up the lines and also to give them a more usable size tract. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 83-41 APPROVED Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PZ 83-41. This motion was seconded by Mr. 'Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11:45 P.M. . Chairman, Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning & Zoning - . . . /oA ( c KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas April 27, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-41, MF TO LR, GRID 115 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and ~ind that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. -W. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works ". . 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283·6211· METR0/267.3367 . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE 11179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-41 the following described property shall be rezoned from Multi-Family to Local Retail. BEING a portion of a tract of land out of Lot 1, Block 1, Walker Branch Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: . COMMENCING at the southwest corner of said tract, thence north 00 degrees 01 minutes 29 seconds west, 286.6 feet to a point, thence north 44 degrees 45 minutes 59 seconds east, 439.84 feet to a point being the place of beginning of the tract of land herein described; THENCE North 44 'degrees 45 minutes 59 seconds east, a distance of 398.99 feet to a point on the westerly line of Emerald Hills Way, being on the arc of a curve having a radius of 1000.33 feet and whose center bears north 63 degrees 21 minutes 54 seconds east; THENCE Southeasterly with said westerly line along'the arc of said curve to the left through a delta angle òf 3 degrees 23 minutes 23 seconds, a distance of 59.18 feet; THENCE with said westerly line South 30, degrees 01 minutes 29 seconds east, a distance of 118.04 feet to the beginning of a curve having a radius of 1317.44 feet and whose center bears north 59 degrees 58 minutes 31 seconds east; THENCE Southeasterly with said westerly line along the arc of said curve to the left through a delta angle of 6 degrees 42 minutes 42 seconds, a distance of 154.24 feet to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes 31 seconds West, a distance of 452.92 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 1.44 acres of land. . Page 2 This property is located approximately 150 feet northwest of Highway 26 on Emerald Hills ~ay.. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF MAY, 1983. &~C. h~~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 7?;£~~ (;f: ~ ~ SECRETARY PL ING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CÂSE NO. PZ-83-41 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1983. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ;2:û DATE: June 22, 1983 SUBJECT: Supplemental Budget Request ~TMENT: Library BACKGROUND: It has been·. suggested that a Supplementary Budget Request would be åppropriate at this time. The NRH Library Commission appointed a citizen Needs Assessment Committee in in January, 1983 to study the informational needs of the citizens of North Richland Hills and to ~valuate both the Library's resources and those of other area institutions to meet those needs. On May 19 at its fourth meeting, the Needs Assessment Commîttee drew up a set òf short- and long-term goals and objectives for the Library Commission to implement. Several of the goals and objectives can be met this year by means of the following $100,000 Supplemental Budget Request. Most items reflect direct response to the questionnaire completed by a ,survey sampling of 490 citizens, library users and staff members. . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: (1) Approve a Technical Services Librarian position (see justification and job description attached) (2) Approve 20-hours-a-week staffing of Circulation Desk (3) Approve library materials; books and A/V materials and equipment (see ac'counts 6500 and 6800 line items). BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT !~UMBER: 1000 Salary and Fringe ßenefits 2000 Supplies 4000 Special Service~ 6000 Capital Outlay $ 3,225 500 400 95,875 _.. - - . .......-- Total: $100,000 ~----~-~------~---~-~-----~----~---------~-------------~~-------~-~---~---~~-~---~-------~---- . RESOURCES PERSONNEL SUPPLIES . MAINTENANCE GENI;RAL SERVICES SUNDRY CAPITAL TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS ACTIVITY TECHNICAL SERVICES BUDGET 1981-82 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PURPOSE: ACTIVITY DETAIL ACTUAL 1981-82· BUDGET 1982-83 ESTIMATED 1982-83; ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-50-04 PROPOSED 1983-84 ADOPTED 1983-84 $ 3,225 500 400 95,875 $100,000 1.5 To al~ow th~ Public Library to more adequately respond to the informationål, educational, cultural and recreational needs of the citizens of North Richland Hills by providing more library materials and the required personnel and equipment required to support those materials. CITY OF N,ORTH RICHLAND HILLS M >-. +Jr-{ ; CX) ~. ç:r-I ~ rn )..f0'\ Cd'1j Q) eM +J Q Cd~ ~"C ~ ~ S Q J: 0 0 r-4 r!),< $-f 0 ~ c: eM +J bO +J eM ='- -~ +J eM =,..c +J ~o 0 cJ bO eM +J OJ òO~ d H cJ c.J cu ~ M t.:) ~- cu 0 d Q rn eM .c Q) (1) cu eM Q bOM -=: 0 .,.f .c eM ~ en ~ ~ bOO H o ..c eM '"0 CO '"0 ~ .u t\j +J ,-.. s:: >-. ::s Or-f +J s.. Cd .u +J ~ =='0\ (;) .a.J : : 0 ..... cu '"0 cu Cd 0 Cler-4 ~ cJ ::s Þ-. .¡.J '"O.c~ eM p.. r-4 òO cu P-."'O ..c::- eM eM 0 cJ ~ s:: en Q OJ ~ OJ ..... eM '"0 ..c 0 Q +J ) >-'0 Cd ~ 0 cJ ~ ~ QJU) \&..t ~ =' cJ 0 0 t: "'d +J (1) J.-l eM +J :::3 eM cO t"Ò~ ~ ..-( ~ t"Ò +J ~ ~ CU,.c: QJ CU òO t"Ò 4-J en O.u.....r-f .w ~ +J eM J.-l cJ cJ òO ~ $-f eM er-t .c:: . eM ~::s ~ tQ 0 J.-l .u S >-. "'C J.-l er-t t"Ò"'C t"Ò .c en en en òO+J Q)f"4 : : ::1 er-t C'd C't1 ~- ~ '"0 ::s ..c r-4 ::s .c eM 0 eno 0 CU CU () >~ t'J .ur-f QJ t"d <: cJ ) p..,..c U H p..<~ p....c ~O 0 eM =' M OJ p..~ () >-.M 00 bOOOOJ ..c r-fOO 0 OJ 0"\ tJ) o eM ~ N 0 =='0\ ~ ~ -+-' E-4~ H~~ '0 (lJ N lI"\ en 00 ~ - ,....... ~ 0 N ("I"') " f'.. ~ N a.. N \0 N N 0 ~ ,....f ("I"') ~ ~ . {J)- <J)- c:: en . Q) t:J .µ ~ r-f M ~ en =' t"d CO t1J +J +J 0\ ::> .,.f 0 ~ Z M "0 H I CO c: N 8 , Q) ex) 5 N 0.. 0'\ CD X ~ 0 C:J U U) U ~ ~. ~ ~ H ~ · M :t: >c o..Q Q ~ x, . t:J ~ ~ ~ ("') U M , 8 U'J CD M ..... H I U t:.. N .¡.J H CO ta ~ :c E-4 E-t U) 0:: 1iJ 0 ::> z Ol J.J fJ t"'") OJ e:., CO 0" 0 I 'C E--c N :ï >c ~ CO Q 8 t=> ,H 0 U ::> CQ ~ H Z JJ ~ N (lJ CO Ö\ ~ I rc ~ ~ ::1 p... CO 0 P-t :::> CI) SO SO .µ OM +J 0("1"') OJlI"\ r= ~ r= ~ S ct1~ t"d ~ 00 er-t .u +J .&.J .&.J ClJ .u .µ rn ~ p.. en ~ p.. ,.. () ,1 P. >-. eM ClJ Q) er-t CU CU - 0 er-f ,....f QJ $-f rn SeI) en SU) .u r= ..... :>,..-4 C/) ("t"') cO rn er-t rn eM s:: 0 oW ~ ::s ex:> $-f <.u I <.µ I CU eM c., QJ'+-4 $-f0"\ ..c I I S .u r= '..-i U)'-'O~ eM H ~+J~ ~.u~ Q) t"d 0 ~ 4-1 ....:I $-f J.-l~ $-f $-f~ $-f N eM CJ ,....f Q ~ " .u t"d C'd t"d t"d eM ·M Q) rn .&.J U) C'd C'droo en r= ~ p.. ~ ("f') $-f p.. >-. M +J r-I c.J C'd 8 CJ-r-t <1J("f') $-4 C't1 ..c '-' r-I CX) ..c '-' r-I CX) Q) Cd r= r= en -r-f $-f .µ =' .u eM ='0\ eM ='0'\ ~ .µ Cd CU r= c:: cO <1J 0 en 'HH~~ ~H~~ -M ~ ] Q) .. ..c $-f OO.µ ::c eM p.. =' p.. E-4 U..c"'C p.. en rn en ,... S .. Z CU-r-t ::s CU 0 en ~ N 0 r= 0 0 8 ~ HÞ-1:OCI) N < H U Z ,¿,. ~ 8 E-4 a: .¡,J 0 ~:. < 0 0 0 0 C N Lf') ~ 0.. ::] 0 0 \0 ex:> 0\ c.. t:4 t-4 ~ ~ C1J Q 0 ~ ~ -« --' U --' C u .c:: -. . . TECHNICAL SERVICES LIBRARIAN JUSTIFICATION: The present clerical level of staffing in Technical Services is no longer adequate to handle today's cataloging demands. A professionally~trained librarian with a knowledge of the new Anglo- American Cataloging Rules II, is required to properly prepare our bibliographic records for the data base of our automated circulation system, to interface our collection with an automated public card catalog and to design an au~omated acquisitions and interlibrary loan . system. Since the library starte~ twelve years ago, ~~ staff member has been added to our Technical Services section. Also in addition to the burden of more sophisticated cataloging rules, the book~processing work load has increased dramatically. Due to the public demand .for more hours, more referenc~ service, the increased borrowing of library materials and the added Citicable 36 responsibilities, staff members from other sections of the library can not be diverted to assist in Technical Services. A Technical Services librarian is crucial to the library's ability to both catch up and meet today's needs. To belp support the reasonableness of this request,· I have attached a comparison of the number of library staff members and the per capita tax support provided by adjoining cities. A job description is a~so included. ~.. -. . .. "'~": :.;. ......J... ~~.,_,._. .........__~.... "-'0 . I TECHNICAL SERVICES LIBRARIAN NATURE OF WORK The position provides general coordination, supervision and assistance in the Technical Services functions of the library. Work is performed with considerable independènce within the framework of established policies and is ' subject to general supervision and review by the Library Director. EXAMPLES OF WORK PERFORMED Supervises and coordinates the functions of Technical Services. This includes: 1. Cataloging all materials for public use. 2. Maintaining the card catalog (when automated, it will include maintenance" of the item data base). ' 3. Coordinating the ordering and receiving of all acquisitions. 4. Supervising the processing of all items in the collection. Performs original cataloging. This includes: 1. Maintaining the shelf list (when automated, the data base must be maintained accurately). . 2. Assigning subject headings, call numbers and added entries to approxi- mately 25% of all acquisitions (when automated, this will include coordinating and editing the input of a full bibliographic-in the data base). 3. Determining the catagory codes, item types and other pertinent data. Establishes" and maintains the work flow in the processing area to physically maintain the collection. This includes: 1. Supervising of the physical processing of all items for public use. 2. Determination of which items should be bound, repaired, or discarded. 3. Acting as library liaison with binderies. Makes recommendations to the Library Director regarding the hiring) promotion or termination of technical services staff. This includes: 1. Evaluating staff performance. 2. Assisting in staff development and training. 3. Training volunteers. .. . . TECHNICAL SERVICES LIBRARIAN Page 2 . Provides monthly reports, acts as library representative to the North Texas Library System's Automation Committee, selects materials in assigned categories, and acts as supervisor of the library during assigned extended library hours. Also will prepare for the processing and maintenance of the collection for automation. ' REQUIREMENTS OF.WORK Knowledge of AACR I and II (Anglo-American Cataloging Rules). Familiarity with conventional areas of acquisition and cataloging, including treatment of gifts,· exchanges, and the bindery. Ability to coordinate the input of an automated data base. Must know all facets of the Dewey and Sears systems. Ability to coordinate, supervise, and teach. Must be available for work one evening per week and one Saturday every four weeks. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING REQUIRED· Master of Library Science from an A.L.A. accredited college. Two years professional experience or any equivalent combination of training and experience. CITY OF NORTH RICHL~~ HILLS - 3/83 .~~ , . . '. . . , - ~ - . , . D. NRH PUBLIC LIBRARY RESOURCES COMPARED WITH . . ACÇEPTED STANDARDS FOR TEXAS PUBLIC LIBRARIES IN CITIES WITH 25,000 - 49,999 POPULATION (TRA/PLD) ACCEPTED STANDARD NRH PL CHANGE .. .. Adequate Superior Adequate Superior 1 .' Per Capita Support $8 $16 $4.9 +$3.1 $11.1 2. Staff Total Staff 16 20 8.4 +7.6 +11.6 (1 per 2 , 000) , (1 per 1,500) Professionals/ 3 4 2 +1 + 2 MLS (1 per 10,000), (1 per 8,000) 3. Resources 64,000 128,000 37)000 +27,000 +91,000 (colleetion) .(2 per c.apita) (4 per c.apita) (1+ per capita) 4. Facilities 24,000 (.75 sq. ft. 10,559 13,441 sq. ft. per person) sq. ft. sq. ft. 5. 411Þrs of Service 50 73 50 --....---- +23 i . . . - "- .......-.-................-. ..... --.. Cf.) t::I 1- c Q) ...-( ..Q öOM ~ C> ~ 0 .u c: roo( ~ ~ 0 ..... ~ .ù -r-4 cø ~ tt1 Q to Q) U .r-f Cf.) '+-of. .u ...... Q) 0 cU ~ .u c.J S .~ Cf) 0 c: J.J .,-4 ~ 0 >. to CIJ 0.. .,-4 ~ Cf) .u t'Ø =' cø~ tJ J-I to-;) 0 d..c 0 0 ;jar-l ~...o~r-C ...::t "0 0 (l) I U) 0 0 0 0 LI') a. Lf"\ I 0 <n- ....... ~. 0 ~ 0: tn . (l) ~ .µ ~ ~ ~ U) =' ex:> ~ .µ 0\ ::> ...... ~ Z M '0 , E-r CD s::: I Q) N g N a. ex:> CO . X 0'\ -0 P:J ...... U tf.) U ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ . r""') - )( ... O,¡a:> 0 ~ x, .~ ~ ~ ~ r""') U t'f") , 8 l/) CD t""') """' H I U ~ N ~ H co ~ ~ I ::c E-c ~ UJ " ~ 0 :::> z Ol .:.J ~ r""') Cl) r:... co Ö" 0 I "C t-c N =' ~ t:J CD ~ E-c l-' H 0 () ~ ~ ~ <:: H Z ..w ~ ::E: N Q} IîJ CD Cj\ ....;¡ I "0 ~ ~ =' ~ co C!J p tI) Cf) OJ .r-( ,.....f r- ~ 0 ~ .r-( =' oW Cfj ~ òO .~ C ~ er1 U 0.0 tf) 0 8 r-I C'd .. .u rd .. E-t U f-t z Z ~ ~ E-t E-c ex; .¿J a; -< c 0 ~ 0.. =' 0 Q., !.;J 0 \.0 úJ 0 N 0 . ..... ....,~........ ~ .- $: ~ t:J I c: C'Ø 0 l' r:..- 0 ~ CI) ~ '-0 -< 0 ..-( ç: CJ ~ ,.., CI) ~ oW I C'Ø eM ,.., ctS QJ '\j en 0 ..c: C'Ø en M ,.., CJ U eM ,.., ç: p..,.., n1 ctS..Q 0 ..-( o..öOctS..Q Q) CJ eM ~ ~ ~ ·M ,..,..... ,.., eM H~ ..-( en 0 CI.) bO~ ctS ~ . eM µ Q) ..c: en~ .u ~ ~~ bO Q) CJ Q) 0 CD ctS~ ~ ç: CJ Q) (J 0 =' eM Q) ~ C'Ø eM eM E-f eM ~ i"') CJ~~'µ~ þ :> Q) Q) ,.., en $-I ,.., $-I $-I~ Çl.Q) Q) ~ ctS Q) 0 QJ ç: U) d p.. ·M S CI) µ.. U) ctS "0 Q) tI) 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0., N N ~ f 0 <n- <n- O ~ I..f) ~ I --t 0 0:: tn . a> ~ .µ ~ ~ ~ en ::3 ctS rr) ::> t:J ~ ~ CO Z ..-( 0 0'\ M "0 ~ ,....., E-4 ex:> c: J ~ I Q) N N ~ ex:> CO X ~ 0 t:J () CJj U ~ ~. ~ ~ H t:J eM :r: )of ClceD 0 ~ X, "ttJ~ ~ ~ f""") U M "- ~ U) CO M ëJ H I r:.. N .., H ex:> ~ " I ::c ~ E-t U) ~ C:J 0 ::> z Ol JJ ~ M aJ tz., CO Ö' 0 I '2 E-f N ~ >c txJ CO ~ E-4 c." ,H Q CJ ::J t:Q ~ E-i Z,- .., ~ N CJ ~, CD 0'\ µ:¡, I "0 ....:; ~ ::J ~t CD aJ p..¡ :::> U) ,.., ctS en ,..,Ptj -0 c .c ~ ~ 0 .,-1 ctS ~ -,-1 r-f CI.) ~ c:: 4-f C 0 ,.., ,00 s:: 0 OJ ..... o .,-1 0 .u .u "4-1 (/.) -M c:: :< ~ OJ +J 0 Q) ..... .u'1:j ctS '",-1 ~ en .u ~ Q) tJ e,-4 en c:: ctS ~ CJ) ...... CJ Q) ~ 0 8 cø -,-4 e r-f..c .,-1 ..c: QJ ctS Çl. CJ Çl.r-4 ~ aJ .. QJ ctS Cl. c/)r-f e-. Çl."" e c:: Q) E-c Z t/) b.Cl~ H .µ Z ~ ~ E-t E-c ex: J.J 0:_ < c: 0 0 -=: 0.. ::J 0 Lf) 0., tJ.1 0 00 00 t¡J C CJ ...::t ~ C 0 ..... ' Cd ...c:: . .....~ Q) CJ Cf) +J rc ~ "M ~ aU "M ~ Q) Cf) Cf) Q) >- ~ 0 Cd CfJ ~..c: 0 CfJ C1J ~ . ctS aU~ ) 'el"1 . er1 ..c: .u .u ~ "CtS CJ bO ~ CzJ C ..c: 00 . > CJ s:: J.;f C1J er1 s:: Cf) 0 0 Q) ro.u ,.., C1J ~Q)t+-f 0 OM >..,.c Q) "1"1 ~ tt... ..-( Cd ODQ)~ Q)~ ""~H 0 Q) ,... (/) bO CJ aU ~ 0 .u Q) t:- ~ ..eM . C'Ò "Or-f ,... C1J CI) d eM e.-4 0.. ~ ,... 0 Cd ..u Cd r:: .u Q) Q)~ tf.) Q)-r-f >"0 0 ro CJ 0-0 0 ~~ . > Q) CJ .u ~ d ..... ~ Cf) 0 o er1 ro 0 ~..c~ o Cd Q) 0 ~ d ~O E3 +J+J CJ Q) S ,... ctS ,... eM CJ) CJ ..... 0 J-I N CfJ e,.1 Q) r:: ,... t'd~ CJ p.> eM Q) d""" Cd "0 CJ) eM < Cf) ~ .....-f eM Q) .....-f '"Cj .u aU > 0 Cd Q) s:: eM ,.0 -M s:: ~ .....-f ro Q) CD ro eM . ,... 0 ~'"Cj Q) er1 ~..c: OM CJ .u =' ~ Q) 00 ~ aU Cd U ,... Q) CJ Q)~ CJ 0 Cd-r-f Cf) ,.., :s fa r:: 0 eM ro CJ eM CJ Q) Q)..o r:: Q) CJ 0 Cd ~ S ~ CfJ J-I eM :> ·M s:: CJ~ OO..c: òO J-I CJ 0. 0. ,... O~ ,.o~ J-I ~ er1 Cd ,... =' CJ t: eM Q) ~ p. Q)r-f..c eM ~ Q)~ ro ~ os:: O..e Q) 0 ~.u 0 U} 0 Cf)eM ~ .u CJ "0 (lJ 0 U) ...:::t 0 0 0 0.. 0 ~ I 0 ...:::t 0 ~ <l)- ll') ~ .. I ~ 0 0: en . Q) r-f ttJ +J )..f Cd C"') ~ U) =' .u CO t:J .µ 0 0'\ ::> . roo( .u ~ Z M "0 I I E-t CO c ..c N I Q) =' t;i) 5 N ~ CJ) '" CO X ~ 0 CtJ .() en U ~ Z ~ ~ H ~ eM :c )04 acco X,," 0 ~ .~ ~ . . Z ~ C""") ~ U M ......... 8 UJ CO M ëJ H I ~ N .¡,J H CD ~ c:; I = E-c 8 CI) ex:: ~ 0 ::> z 01 .¡,J ~. t""") Q) tt.. CD Ö' 0 I "0 E-c N ::3 >c ÇiJ CD a) ~ ~ H Q U :::> ~ ~ H J.J Z ~ N (1) ~ CO Ö' ~ I "0 ~ ~ ::s t:Lf CO CO P-4 ~ tf.) Q) tf) ...c:: s:: .u 0 "M '" .u ,... +J ,... ~ tf) C 0 CJ 0 ,... · M 0 ~ c: ~ C'd ~ .~ ::s +J 0 oW 'Q) 4-1 Q) Q) toM Oat CJ CJ ,... .u .~ ro t: toM CJ 0- ~ 0..0 ~ Q) Q) U tf) eM ~ U) 0 CJ) .u 0 Q) ~ Q) C1j . ~ ~ bl)r-f Q) ,... ,... ::s +:J C1j Q) . . C1j CJ C1j ~ d e. ~ ~ ~ Q),.o 0 E-t z d eM ,... toM ..c: ~ u z ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ -=: oW 0 ~. ~ C 0 -::c C::! ::s N 0.. 0 ú.J Q U ~ 0 u .c:: ...-4 _,-01,. .. At' .. '. ,-_.~..... ',"^- . - '.,,-....,. -c_, OJ Cd OJ OJ OM CJ CJ c.J òO 0 Cd ;j er-t -M Cd 0 s:: M ~ s:: :> $-I .. 0 $-I M Cd OJ ..c:: . ~ 0 Lf"'\ eM OJ Cd OJ òOS:: ti1 c s:: ~ (J OJ +J '-' +J +J (J (J s:: 0 0 M Cd OJ CI) CI) er-l ;j -M Cd er-l er-l ~ Cz..- ..... Cd e1""4 0 E-t C/}~ ~ s:: p.. :>+J òO òO ~ 0 .w u ~ E-t C 00 ~~ S ..c:: C/} M er-l s:: s:: ø.. ~ e1""4 Cd s:: 0 s:: 0 Cd 0 (J OJPtj eM e", 0 C ~. e"'¡ er-l e1""4 0 tJ OJ~ ~.~ ~ :> ..... ..c::..c = = : ~ : +J = = Ptj ..c OJ H ~ M M ~ tJ e1""4 M Cd M ~ ~ 0 OJ OJ ..... OJ"':¡ OJ r-1 0 M er-l 0 M ~ M $-I ..c:: ..c .¡.J E-t :> ;j ..c Cd ::3 ~ Cd Cd 0 U) C/} U) cri OJ C/} tJ '-' s:: tT òO OJ c: C/} ~~ OJ tQ ~ OJ M OJ ~ 0 OJ s:: CO $-I 0 OJ 0 +J ~ ) =' OJ tJ tJ er-l er-l $-I - r-I c: ro er-l tJ er-t Ptj +J OJ OJ IJ s:: er-l = = : c : OJ er-t c.:> : = : +J :> er-l ) +J er-l +J OJ OJ C C :> U) :> -r-I M r--I U) +J -M :> er-l Ptj C/} ~ ~ .r-f .~ ~ ~r-1 OJ ::S~ "0 $-I "0 OJ C/} ~ ~ 0 OJ 0 Q) '0 "0 .r-I ..c 0 0 rcj OJ "0 OJ ro 0 0 tf.) COO ~ -< ) en ::c C/} < CI) < C CJ ~ ~ "0 Q) " en 0 -.::t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lf"'\ r'- \0 0 0 0 0 ...;:t 0 0 ....... 0 0 ('t1 0 0 0 0 Lf"'\ ~ 0 0 " ...:t 0 ~ Lf"'\ ~ 0'\ ~ ('t1 N ('t'") ...;:t 0'\ -.::t CO ...;:t Lf"'\ 0 ~ ~ I 0 CO 0 ~ ....... Lf"'\ ~ '<J)- I ~ 0 a:: en OJ riI .µ ~ ~ tI) =' C"") t:J .¡.J 00 ::> ..-{ ~ Z M "0 ......t I 8 CD c: N I Q) 5 N 0.. CO 0'\ 0 CD X ,.....; t2J tJ U) U -=: ~ ~ ~ H ~ · M :I: )of ~CX) x, 0 ~ . tt:! ~ ~ ~ t"'"') U M , ~ U) C() M ..... H I U t:.. N .¡.J H CD ItS " :: 8 E-4 U) a:: C:J 0 ::» .¡.J z Ol M (lJ e:.. ~. ex:> Q'\ 0 I "C 8 N =' )of ~ CD CO E...c ø H Q U :::> t:Q ~ H .u Z N Q) E:3 CO Q'\ ~ J "C ~, ..-1 =' ..J CO ca ~ P.f P tJ) 0 LI"'\ -r-I \0 0 "0 ....... en 0 ;j en <J)- ~ N ~ ro OJ ..... ~ OJ <I>- H 0 OJ +J C H Ptj H ~ ~ $-I ~ +J 0 H en -,-i ~ H 0 Cd 0 OJ .~ .u :> CO ~ ~ ~ en ~ J.J tJ OJ .,-t C/} c.J c: .u en $-I c.. -r-t c: Ptj ~ -r-I -r-t +J~ bO Cd en Cd .~ ~ -r-I c.J ~ :> -r-I 0 c: c.J r-I ~ ,.,. ~ +J ~ ~ ,..c ,......f ::s +J ~ r-I c: en -r-I (1) ..c u -r-t tJ OJ 0 Cd Cd ~ CJ OJ (1) ::s :> 0 en ..c e,-i tf) Cd OJ +J +J tJ tJ +J OJ +J s:: ..c $-I M OJ "0 Cd ~ ~ ..c: r-I er-l Cd -r-f M er-f -r-I en :>'(1) OJrcj c: r-I U Q) ~ r-I OJ +J ~ OJ ~ ~ Cd +J ..c eM OJ tf) ) ;j r-1 C/} 0 tI) ~ OJ en M ::s en :> ~ .. ~ ~ Q) tJ .r-I ;j ~ 0 OJ ~ bO~ p..p.. ~ ~ M ~ rn (f.) ~ Cl.. r-I ~ 0 C/} p:: ):: p.. 0 C 0 en S en :>"0 0 OJ .. Z OJ OJ p::'~ Cd (J OJ ~ ~ 0 Cd· 0 er-l 0 OJ ..........C 0 ..c 8 ~ H .u N H .+J () < Cd p:: tI) Z E-4 ~ 0:: .ù ~ ~ ".. tl. C 0 ~ t:1' :::J 0 p.. Q 0 LI"'\ ~ U \0 0 U -0) -'. ....... .-..----....., ~ -.---.. --........- -00 en 00 Q) ~ Q) C\1 00 r-I Q) () t::, r-I Q) ~ ~ C\1 I ~ ~ Q) 0) ..c ~ ~ t:: 0 ~ t'Ø OJ ~ -M '"'Cj t'Ø 0 CJ J-f- "-(1.) r-I Q) ..c: 0 tz:l c: Q) 0 ctS +J =' ~ t:: Q) e ~ CI) I -~ ~ t:.c 0 ~ -~ J-f -M ~ J-f ~'"'Cj Po. s:: ==' ~ tIJ ~ 0 ..... -~ :> ...c r-I CI) ~ Q) t'Ø -M 0 t:: 0 -~ tIJ""d 0.. .u r-I ~-r-4 -~ ""d ...cr-1 Q) ;j -~ Q) ..c: aJ aJ t\S Q) aJr-I 0 J-f ;j er-l J-f ~ 0) ~ ~ I en aJ ~.w 0 ""d tIJ ct1 0 ~ ;j -M aJ tI) -M 0 ~ e tIJ 0 ~ ..... t:: ~ ~ 00 .t:: :3 :3 =' ""d ~ -M r-I ;j ~ -M ~ o ""d -r-1 CI) Q) :> ""d ..c .~ o..ctS ..... ~ ~..c:: ~""d Q) ,..c: r-I Q) t:: --...... t:: ~ tIJ 4-1 t:: 0.. .u C\1 ~ '1j Q) òD +J ct1..c: < 0 ~ 0.. 0 ~ tIJ .~ ;j'1j C\1 -H t:: c.J ~ ~ Q) -H -M ~ J-f 0.. CD c.J ~ ~ ~ aJ ~ o ·ri 0 '1j .u CI) cø ~ ct1 +J Q) O' =' -r-1 c.J () aJr-I -H ~ ~ r-I CO =' o..~ Q) ct1 :> ~ t'J ..c:: Q) CI) S::r-I 0 ~ 0 0 0.. 0 CI) Q) CI) r-f 0.. co""d p..-r-¡ ~ Q) t'Ø öO -H ~""d ..c:: ..c:: s ~ s c.J ,..c:~ ct1,.Q Q) J..f Q) ""d c.J aJ J-f r-I r-I J-f c.J ~ ~ ~ 0 J..f4-1 0 '1j ·H Q) 0' 0 o -H o -,4 0 0 0 ct1 en cø 0 H4-I H4-I H H..c '0 Q V) ~ en 0 0 N 0 111 ........ Lt"\ 00 0'\ ....... 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 ......... ........ ......... ...:t ~ LI') 0 ~ I ~ LI') \.0 N '" ~ ~ N N LI') ~ 0 0 Lf) ~ ("t'") ~ I 0:. ~ ~ <n- O ex: en Q) ~ .µ ~ r-I ("I"") ~ (J) :1 cø CC ::> ~ .µ ~ '" .~ 0 ~ Z M '0 H , 8 CD c: I .E'J I Q) S N 0., ..c CO CD X =' '" 0 W t/.) ;..;.. U U) ~ ...:¡ ~- ~ H ~ eM ::c >t 0.. CD ~ x. "- a . r::¡ ~ . . Z ~ t"'") ~ U M "- 8 U2 CD f"") U H t C:.4 N .µ H CD t\S " :c E-4 8 U) " C:J 0 ::J Z 01 .u ~ M QJ t:.. CD t;\ 0 I ro E--t N ~ ~ µJ co Q ~ l? .H 0 C) ::::> t:Q ~ H Z .¡,) E.:3 N (lJ ~ CD Ü' ~ I "C H ~ ::s ~ CD Q ~ :::> CJ) J-f tIJ 0 e 4-1 co Q) J-f ~ ~ --...... r-I 0 Po. OD 00 ""d ,... ..c .u .u 0 0 C ~ ;:j Q) C\1 t) ~ -H ,... ,... J-f 0 00. +J ""d +J Q) -..-. ~ Q) "tJ 0.. -..-f ...-. 00 en cà -r-¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...., "00 Q) Q) ~ 0 öO Q) () öO ~ ~ r-I ,... ~ ~ J-f ~ ,... ~ ...-. co ~ co -~ r-I ..0 0 aJ 0.. Q) Q) ·ri :> ..0 ·ri ~ . ~ ct1 ct1 4-1 Q) S t:: c.J ~ .u ..c u ~ +J ,..c: 0.. p.. -ri -ri ct1 p.. Q) (/.) -r-f (/) 0 tIJ () -H -r-1 ..0 r-I Q) -ri S cà ~ 8 -ri ~ ,... .r-t ,... =' ,... cà 0.. ~ ,... -ri () +J '\J ·ri (/.) 4-1 Q) t:r +J () (/.) () +J .u --...... () =' ro aJ 0 +J aJ tIJ (/.) Þ>'\Q) .. Q) +J ,..c:~ ~ ~ s e e s e ,...~ E-c ,... en c.J..o c.J ·ri :> 1"-4 r-I r-I r-I M 0..0 E-t Z ·ri ro -ri ,... --...... -r-1 -ri -r-t -ri . -r-t +J ct1 ~ N CC+J Z ~ E-c ,-.... a: .µ ~ ~ JJ 0 ~ 0::, ~ c 0 0 -< úJ :s Lf) CJ 0., 0 0 \0 '-' C:J U Q U ~ o I o L/") I ....... o 0: t:J ~ :> z 8 Z ::> o u u ~ en . QJ .µ ).of U) ::1 t¡J.,µ -.-( M'"O <J:) c: I C) N ~ CD X C:J · M C4Q X'"' .~r-t M M '"' COM I N .:.J CO ~ ~ M (l1 CO 0'\ 1'0 N :J CO Q J..J N CJ CO 0" I "C r-t :J CO CJ .. E-4 Z ~ e-. ~ < c.. ~ o c o .~ oW ~ U .,., ~ ..... oW tQ :J t'j '0 C) tI') o 0.. o ~ c::. ,. o 0,-1 .., ~ .-f :.... u en 8 :> .......... < ~ "'\:1 . en s:: ~ cø o o ..c CD CD Q)...-f ~ s:: cø ~ -r-f -M cø N ~ ~ cø Q) ..c bO.u eM ct3 CÒ .u C :] o u u o o CX) \D o 0'\ N \C ....... <rr ~ Z H ~. ~ s:: cø t:: -M s:: o "'C eM ~ C .¡.J s:: cø CJ e Cò ~ er-f 0 :< ~ -M s:: Q) en .¡.J~~~m s:: -M ~ U} ~ Q)~M+JCò ~ I er-f M ~ e..c:: =' M ='OCJ~M US::'-'CCCC ....... o o N ....... ....... c Q) C ~ O'\j Q) C M :> -rl er-f '\j ..c:: +JetJ,...... tJCò'-'+J Q) ,-( P-c s:: e ::s (/}OO~ o .r-f -r-f Cò ~ +J +J +JCJtJ'\j (1J eM -M C ~~~cø . N o L/") N ~ ....-4 (/) Q) +J c:J Q) ,.., Q) tJ ::S,.., C 0 +J ~ ~ (/) (/) Cò ~ ~ CJ ~ cø Q) eM 00 ,.., e C 0 ~ CM cø cd c..ð .¡.J Q) eM C C ~ OJ ::s ~C,!)Q CJ) ~ o o ~ Q) CJ s:: Q) ,.., . Q)M ~ c:J Q) s:: ~ eM "'C C +J (/) (/) Cò ,.., ~ Cò 0 o Q) 0 §:ig~~ -r.-f Q) 00 tJ +J ~ eM 0 er-f Cò (/) tJ M U} ,.., "'C U) 0 =' 0,.., C S P-c 0 ~..c:: ~c:JOtJ"'C 8~§~~ o o L/") Cf.) Q) C -M N Cò 00 "Cò ~ H Z H ~ ~ I Z o ~ (/) CJ) Or4- CC ,.., o Q)tJ Q) CO ..c:: eroof '\j 0'\ CJ "'C Cò ......c e r-f 0 OJ '-' ~ eM P::: o ,.., ~ ,.., Q) C en tJ o..-r-f OJ -M r4 S eM ~ ,...... ~....... tJOO Cd 0"\ ~....... o o o ~ .¡.J"'C d Q) · Q) :< Q) ~ Q) "'tJ ~ roo -roof =' d =' tJ -r-f C,!) ......c rzJ ~ r.. . -=:0 0.. -("Ij 00 0'\ ....... I N 00 ~ U) j ~. Ht::1 :C~ O~ ~êJ ~ tf) H Ur:.. H ex: ::I:E-t 8U) ø:: ~ 0::> ZOl ~~ o E-c ~ tiJ 8Ø .H 0 u:::> C:Q ~ H Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::::> (J) .. E-4 Z t::J ~ E-4 c::;" ~ -=: Cl. CiJ o UJ ciJ ~ ÍJ .µ 00 QJ r-4 p... 00 to) ~ ct1 6 .µ QJ ct1 ct1 ,.., e .µ Q) .r-f S ctS ~ 0 S to) .µ 0 cÖ, QJ ~ ~ ~ p.. . .µ 00 .,... ....... ~ tiJ C 0 Q) 0 òO S,-... I 00'-0 00 ~ òO ~o 0 S òO~ 0....... O' ..0 ~ <r>- CI) 0 ~ 0 000 "'tj "'tj t=> ~. .... ctS ~ 0 tJ (J o..c C\1 0 ,.., QJLf) Q) Q) II( 0 .u ... .)..4 òO P. Cò ..c.µ I r-4 en ...-f p.. -M «f)- .µ .u ~ ~ QJ QJ r:: ~ QJ QJ : .r-f O~ .µ .µ ctS °cÖ U CJ :> .,.; ~.µ 50 ~o 0,-... tJ ~ ,.., .µ H r-4 .r.( ~ 0 > 0 QJ ~ ("I"') I o..c QJ 0 ct1 ct1 ::1 ::s \L., QJ CJ ctS .,.; ..c -..::t 0 CI)-vr rC CJ ...... ...-f p.. (J CJ .~ ,.., C/) ~,.., «f)- ...-f Q) en Cd r-IaU CI) ,.., ,.., .ù Q) QJ I aU ctSr-I .µ .,.; æJ Q) .. Q) 0 cÖ Q) S e..-f ...-f tQ ....... .µ Q) QJ > ctS I CJ >'-" p..J-I eJ N Sr-4 CJ CJ Q) Q) CJ .,.; ~ .,.; 0 ct3 cÖO .,.; o -..-f . ::s ,..,...... cÖ ~ cÖ 00 '+-' S 00,-... 'µr-4~ eJ r:: ..c: ~ ,-... Q) Q) tj p.. p.. ct1 Cl)M I Q),.c: ::S-vr .,.; cÖ ..c ,.c rC ,.., S 00 > ,.., ""-vr ~"'tj S CJ 0 p.. 00 OO""Lf) CJ 0 0 0 QJ 0 r:: ct1 ctS 0 OæJ ct1 ,.., o~ ct1 0 0 ~ CJ ct1 <'+-' p.. æ> Z ct1 OOQJ N p.. '-" ~ ¢ 4-i '-" Q) ~ ~ tö 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lf) ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -..::t ~ en 0 o· 0 0 LI') 0 0 I"- 00 -..::t 0 0'\ Lf) 0 a.. -..::t N Lf) N I"- M N I 0 \0 0'\ 0 ~ «f)- <U)- Lf) ex.. I ~ 0 " en a> ~ ~ ~ r-I ~ en ::s cø ("\'"') t:J +J .µ ~ ::> .,..,f 0 Z M tö .u r-4 ..... I 8 CD c: I co N I Q) / rC .µ S N 0., =' 0 C(' CO X U') E-4 0'\ 0 t1J ..... .() U) U ...:3 ~ ~ ~ H ~ · M :c ~ a.. CO x, 0 ~ .~ ~ . . ~ øe( M CJ M , 8 tJ) co M H I 0 ~ N +J H CO ttj ~ :I: E-4 E-t U) " t:J 0 ::> z 01 JJ FJ. M aJ Cz.t co Ö' 0 I "C ~ N ::s )04 tLJ co ~ ~ l' H Q CJ ::> CQ ~ ~ Z .ù ~ N (!) a:> Ü' ~ I "0 H ~ ::s ~ p.. CD Q ::> CI) .µ Q) ,.., bOt/) CI) Q) en 0 I Q) . Q) ,..,. .µ ~ Q) r-4:::> ...-f co ,..,r-4 M r-4 ,.., ~ en Q) Q) 0 ::s 4-i Q) O"'tj 0 +.oJ '"Ö .µ .u ~"'tj c: 0 HU ~ +.oJ \+.I e"; Q),-... .u .u Cò 0 co tJ a ctS 00 . Q) Q) en .~ Q) ,.., Q) en '"Ö CJ en en S ~ en JJ rC: Cò C/) .. ,.., r-4 -..-f .µ CI) en r-4 aU Q) >-. ~ eJ .µ . Cf) e"; ,.., co ,.., Q) co ct1 -..-f C ~ ~ ~ 0.-( -..-f tf.) :::> òO'"Ö Q) -,-f ~ CJ CJ ~ Q) -M ::s ctS ~ 4-i 0 aU ,.., ,.., ,.., aU ~ 0 u arC: ........ Q) ::s a .. C/} 0 en a en ~~ p.. p.. ~ en ,.., aU S ctS ~ p..aU..c C/} Q) Q) .,.; Q) r-4 ~ tJ ,.., rd +.oJ a S ::3 .µ- Q) '"Ö p.. "'t:j p.. ...-f aU ::s ~ -,-f a ~ rd..c: a aU cÖrC: -,-f rd ::3 ct1 \OrC: ,.., tJ ~~ ODCJ p.. u'-"s CJ :> .µ < .µ ~ u < tJ) - . .. E-c Z N ("t') ~ LJ") \0 ,....... co E-t ~ Z ~ E-c ,-... ex: .&.J .µ E-1 øe=: c: 0 I:: 0::. 0.. 0 0 we::: ~ ::s 00 'v 0.. Q 0 \0 '-'" úJ U Q U -::: .~ DATE: 6-2l-83 . SUBJECT:, Seal Coating City Streets DEP ARTMENT : Public WQrks Oû June 15, 1983, at lO:OO A.M., bids for the above mentioned project BACKGROUND: were opened. Four bi4 specifications were mailed and one re~urned, the r~~ults are outlined below. Exception Amount No Bid R. W. Gibbins Inc. Remco Construction No Bid R. L. Anderson Asphalt No ,Bid Gibbins Construction o $107,570.00 R. W. Gibbins Inc. dec1iped to bid stating that his equipment was not in the most . serviceable condition and considering the time frame required in the ,specification ---..---- ·to comp1e"te the proj ect, he felt it would be more prudent for him not to submit a . bid at this time. Remco Construction: ~1r. Jim Key advised that due to contracts already signed with the City of Dallas and the time frame needed for complet_~.c:~_ of_._.?~.~_pr.<?j,~_<:,E.L_~e__~~u1d _____ not be able to submit a bid. (See attachment)__.____.. ---,,-,._-- CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove awarding a,cont.ract in the amount of $107~570.00 to Gibbins Construction for seal coating. ...--. -----~ _._- -.-- ---".-".~... . BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO General Obligation Funds ~ ------.fA1-----9-------------------------------------------______________·0.. _.- . , R. L. Anderson Asphalt Construction: Ron Anderson advised that the job was . too small for the paperwork and payment and performance bond required, and declined to bid. The Cities of Hurst, Euless, Bedford and Grapevine have been contracting with the County to do their "seal coating". Mr. Elmo Allen, Street Superintenden t for the City of Hurst, advised they have never gone out to the public sector for "seal coating". Mr. Jon N. Jones, Street Superintendent for the City of Arlington, advised that they do all of their own "seal coating" at a cost of .70 cents per square yard" Mr. Bob Holder, Precinct 3, Street Superintendent for the County, advised that their cost to do "seal coating" is $1.00 per square yard and this price includes material, labor, and equipment. Taking into consideration the fact that most of the ~area cities contract with the County or State for "seal coating", we find that the number of vendor's to'perform this type of work is minimal. Mr. Riddle and I feel the price quoted by Gibbins Construction is a fair and acceptable price. At $l07,570 for l12,200 square yards of city roadway gives us a per square yard price of 95.87 cents.- . . Gibbins Construction bid the complete job for material, labor and equtpment, and have provided a cashiers check in the amount of $5,000, as outlined in the specifications, guaranteeing their intent to eriter into a contract with the City of North Richland Hills and execute a bid and performance bond within 15 working days after acceptance by the City Council. The working time for the project shall be 30 working days. The project was estimated to cost between 90 cents and $1.00 per square yard. This' action will complete seal coating recommendations contained in the Public Works study. The County recently finished 13 miles of seal coati~g and this bid contains 9.5 miles. For your information, the first of the two pot hole patching machines will arrive June 30th. . -~- --~~--------- --- ..- -_.-_.~--.-._- ..-- --- ----------.---.----...-: .-. CASHIER'S CHECK E3 HALTOM BANK _~........ ..,....~...ft......,') ..." .....·'DOC NOTtCE TO CUSTOMERS THE PU"CHASE OF' AN INDEMNITY BOND WILL BE IItE.BEFORE AN" OF"F'.CIAL CHECK OF' THIS BA BE REPL.ACED OR REFUNDED IN THE EV 5 LOST, M'SPLþ".CEO 9" STOLEN. PAY FAom: Glbbl~ Con-ótJw..æon H A~ TO"'t~"ãOI O~ ~tll~ ,"Utp ,""'It ,t, ··..4...' a!!t ^ N" "K . .It I uHf ' nnt L it . ~, ¡;¡¡;) r-a- ,111111," "Udte- .ItU'''':'' , ., TO THE Cliy 06 NOMh 1U~hiaYLd H~, Te:x.a..6 ORDER OF . - - . -... ----- ......,... - ': - .:.. " ...·0 ~~ -............. ....... ~. ~ . III 0 0 3 b g .... III I:... g 2 2 7 b 3 I: - ...-.-.- ---- -.. ._-.- ,~:~ '" .. .. ... ':............ .."... ~, .'" . ... ".- . . ., . .~. ~..... :....-~ . .. ......... . ....... . - - .. ... .. ~', '. :. _. ... ....-ø .....~.....,..._.. - .- ..... ................. . ..-. -.. ..... . 11. .;...:.-".._"" ~_..... ......... .,."'~.~ ...-:, ~.--.I~.. -: ~ ~ ... '" . .. ." . ,... - -.- -- -. ... --.-- - . -.. ---... -- -.. .- JU" fL -No. 0 0 3 694 15 83 DATE J u.ne 1 5 , 1 9 g 3 $ 5,000.00 0,{;~>~,~;} ?;V·è7¿~:~:¥ >~~~? ); 1:-::::;';,:;;; ::-:- j1 ;.::;:~.::::;;:.;.;:~ .... ,.rj''/ ,;; /- J.~ . /" ,/, " ¡ 2 0 III 0 ~~!¿S;,~?~1,:~~~~0 -~-- _.......-------------_..-.~--_.- .._-- ...--. --- --._-~..__.-_-~-_.- ---.--.-.---.--. -...-. -' Þ . __..'-e. ..,"".... ~... - ·, '. e .. (I. i !.,{ _-; .( /)- / v S t/ ¡;t~ {..' "', . )".~J """ GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the follo~ing terms and conditions: 1. \.-1ITHDRAWING PROPO·SALS Proposals deposited ~ith the City of North Richland Rills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in ~riting to the PurchasiDg Agent and 'received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsidèration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be vithdra~ after the biàs have been opened) and the bidder, in submitting the samet ~arrants and guarantees that his bid has been car~flllly revie~ed and checked aDd that it is in all things true and accurate and:·free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be ~ithdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. tI 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOS~~S After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, .the proposals \,,'il1 be tabulat·ed· for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals. to yaive technlcalities, and to rea¿vertise for ne~ proposals) or proceed to do the work othe~'ise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals ~ill be considered irregular if ~hey show any omissions, alterations of ·form, additions, or conditions not calleà for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of No~th Richland Hills reserves ~he right to ~aive any irregularities and to make the a~ard in the best interests of the:City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills rese~ves the right to reject any or all proposals) and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejecteõ, among other reasons, for any of the follo~ing specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) \\~re t~e bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier) is in litigation ~ith the City of North Richlanò Hills, ~r where such litigation is contemplated or irnminent, in the sole opinion of saiàCity. _.~..~,,~, .~ . . " ~ 5. DISQUÞ~IFICATION OF BIDDERS Bidder~ may be disqualified and their: proposals not considered» ' among other reasons, for aDY of the following ipecific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion e~ists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is inteLested in more than one proposal for the ~ork contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation ~ith the Ci~y of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated,or imm~nent) in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as reyealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted ~ork ~hich in thè judgment of the City of North Richland Hills ~ill prevent or hinder the prompt completion of add¡tional ~ork if a-ward-ed. 6. AW.~~ OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, ~ill be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lo~est responsible bidder meeting the requirements ~f the City-of North Richland Hills, and ~ill be made ~ithin sixty (60) days after the opening· of the proposal, but not befor~'said City's next monthly meeting. No a~ard ~il1 be made until aÍter investigations are made as to the responsiþilities of the lo~ biòders. 7. AS S I G1\'T}ŒNT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and òuties ~nder an ê.~"ard \.,'i thout the \..'ri·t ten consent of the Ci ty of Nortn Richland Hills Ci ty }1aria'g'er ~ Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liabili ty in ·the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS ~~enever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay ~imely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in '\,.'Tri ting to the Purchasing Agent, stating all releva.nt inforwation ~"i th 'respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any ~ay constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a ~aiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remeèies to ~hich it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, ho~ever) may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because oÍ such delay. 9. BRÞ~D N~~ OR EQUÞ~ . (This claùse is applicable only \o:Ir,en a "brand 112De or equal" purchase description is in~ludeà in an invitation for bids. As UStQ in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make anà model.) ., >0-' ....:' --' - ~ . . . . (a) If items for ~hich bids have been called for have been identified by . a "brand nameor.equal" descríption, such identification is intended .~o be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality .and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bips offering "equa.l" products 1-7111 be considered for a~ard if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determ~ned by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" prod\lcts his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name proàuct referenced in the Invitation for Bids. - ''''~'''-':.. --' -~. ,. ~ 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 .. . 2 1 ~ . . 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 . Rogene Jerrell Marie Charles Ash Colorado Clark Gibbons Joreen Grove. Standley Maplewood Birchwood College Cir. S. }1a p 1 e Deaver·" , 'Terry Owen Post Oak Briarridge Ct. Noneman Payte Crabtree Lowery Lo~'ery Ct. Odell SEAL COATING Linear "Footage RICHLAND HILLS" WEST ADDITION Onyx ~. to Onyx S:. Rogen"e to Rufe Snow Charles to Rufe Snow Onyx N. to Jerrell 1700· 1850 1100 600 5250 -- RICHAVEN & RICHLAND OAKS Hwy 2·6 to Bedford R. Hwy 26 to Bedford Rd. 600 1650 2250 CLEARVIEW ADDITION Davis to Grove Standley to Harwood Grove to Maplewood Clark to Birchwood Davis to Colorado Davis to 'Hwy 26 Davis to Hwy 26 825 1050 1050 1275 1900 1650 1300 9050 COLLEGE HILLS Whitfield to Terry Bogart to Terry Bogart to Susan Lee College S. tb Price Price to Smithfield 1700 2600 1250 1350 550 7450 BRIARWOOD Hewitt to Briarwood Dr. All 900 550 . 1450 SMITHFIELD ESTATES Smithfield to Lowery Cross to End Cross to End Turner to End All West end across Smithfield to Davis 1150 1650 1650 1125' 350 2000 7925 .. ~. ....':,..........' .....:.. Page, 2 PriÚ'rìty Linear Footage NORTH PARK ESTATES . 2 Lancashire 'Yàrmouth Dorchester Yarmouth to Buckingham Watauga to Oldham Little Ranch to Sudbury 1050 1300 1675 4025 TOTAL 37400 Total square yards to be seal coated is 112.200. (Approximate) . - - '~'...~.. ......-: - ~. DATE: 6-17-83 4IÞSUBJECT:partial Pay Estimate #5 to Stolaruk for North Hills Street and Drai~age Improvements' . DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: Except for a few isolated cases all the curb and gutter is replaced on this contract. .We have asphalt on North Hills Drive. They are ge~t~ng ready to put down the asphalt on some of the other streets. They have 37 days remaining and it looks as if they are goin~ to be able to Gompl~t~ Qn timp. ¿ . . --.----..- .-.., .- .-.......,..,-.........--...._--.---..---~--- ..- .....-.. .....-.... CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove payment o~_ $40 ,_~º-~_. 82 to Stolaruk____._____.,_.. Corporation. ._-----. BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: General Obligation Bonds l/)~ ~ . I? ~ '!) ./J/T___________________________________________-____, -----------------~~~---L~ '"" - - -------- . ~ ~ . . . . KNOWL TON-ENGLfSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas June 10, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-325, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NORTH HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.5, dated June 9, 1983, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation, in the amount of $40,406.82, for materials'furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of May 31, 1983. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Bill Rutledge, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that thi s payment, in amount of $40,406.82, be made to Sto1aruk Corporation at P. O. Box 61587, Dallas, Texas 75261. Along with a copy of this letter, the Con~ractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. RWA/l jc Enelosure cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Ronald T. Jonest Stolaruk Corp. >Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Publi.c Works ~ Mr. Bill Rutledge, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 .. l ~. ....... 0~ DATE: 6-17-83 .. . SUBJECT:, Partial Payment Estimate #4. to Stolaruk Corporation DEP ARTMENT : Public Works This payment is for the Holiday North job in which. they have about BACKGROUND: 100 days left~ . . . . . They 'are in the process of pulling curbs' and getting ready to replace ·them. They shouldn't have any problems finishing this job,on time or ahead of time. . CITY COUNCIL AC':I'ION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove payment of $3~034.30 to Stolaruk Corp. BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO ::::_::::~--~::~~::_--------------------~----------------------------- . * ~ ./ . . . \ . ... CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas . . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. June 10, 1983 Honorab l-e Mayor and Ci ty Counci 1 City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-328, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.4 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.4, dated June 9, 1983, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation, in the amount of $3,034.30, for materials furnished and work perfonned on the referenced project as of May 31, 1983. . The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by'your representative, Bill Rutledge, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $3,034.30, be made to Stolaruk Corporation at P. O. Box 61587, Dallas, Texas 7526l. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate fonn for preparing next month's estimate. ( RWA/ljc Enclosure cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Ronald T. Jones, Stolaruk Corp. ~ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Publiç Works Mr. Bill Rutledge, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 . . . c:2~ 817 336-5773 H~ cT~1}Cfc¿~ T 1'f~,~L Aryl! G~ENRf<!r:~ June 22, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Request For Variance From Zoning Ordinance (Brick Percentage) Dear Mayor and Council Members: On behalf of our client Mr. B. R. Flories, we hereby respectfully request to be placed on the June 27, 1983, Council agenda to discuss a possible variance in the zoning ordinance relative to percentage of brick required on a proposed apartment development in North Richland Hills. This property is located immediately north of the MacDonald's restaurant on Trinidad Drive. The proposed development is to be constructed on Lot 2, Block 35, Holiday West Addition, Section 8. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. We plan to have a slide presentation available to you to indicate the type of construction that will be utilized on this site. Very truly yours, TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. \\.l · ()J~ J.~chard Perkins, P.E. JRP/kfs cc: Mr. B. R. Flories 210 West 6th Street, Suite 600 Executive Plaza Building Fort Worth, Texas 76102 . Ie ~..' . ~1 June 1, 1983 City Council North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Attention: Ms. Jeanette Moore RE: Request to Appear Before City Council, June J3th Meeting Dear Ms. Moore: I respectifully request time on the agenda of the June 13th City Council meeting to address them for approximately 5 minutes. I am currently chair- man of the Advisory Board of the Northeast Sector Office of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse. My purpose in addressing the Council is to appeal to them to d~dicate a small percentage of the cities alcohol tax rebate funds from the. state to help support the services provided by our Northeast Sector office of T.C.O.A.D.A. We currently are providing services for the citizens and schools of some thirteen-cities in northeast Tarrant County including North Richland Hills. Several of these cities are 'already providing support from their alcohol tax funds. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. You can contact me at my office number, 283-4461, ext 250 or contact our director, Karen Poidevin at 485-4146. Sincerely, G::B~ ß . '~', .""1.' ... To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records . . . City of J(õrth Richland Hills, Texas December 1, 1983 PUBLIC NOTICE The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, will have a SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING December 5,1983,5:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. T~e following is the agenda: ~ 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of Bids for Health Insurance 4. Executive Session to Discuss Personnel, Land and/or Litigation :....} 5 . Adjournment (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 DATE: December 5, 1983 SUBJECT: Self~Fundin~ of Group Health Insurance . DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Administration We have all come to realize that health insurance costs are rising at . an alarming rate. So much so, that these costs have become prohibitive. In our effort to hold down the costs and to fulfill the Council's desire to protect our employees against the financial burden of a catastrophic illness to one of their family members, we analyzed our program and determined that self-funding was a feasible alternative to our current fully-insured plan with Prudential. We advertised for bids for a self-funded Employees' Group Health Insurance plan. We received six proposals, four of which took exception to one or more of the bid specifications (copy attached). The exceptions taken were critical points in the specifications and those bids did not receive final consideration. Councilmen Richard Davis, Dick Fisher, and I reviewed the two remaining bids - Transport Life Insurance Company and Mutual of New York - and have determined that Transport Life offered 0 the plan that incorporated all of the elements we were looking for in a self-funded plan. Our bid specifications stated that proposals must include Medical, Life, and Dental Insurance. The self-funding program will fund the medical costs and pay the premium for Employees' Life Insurance while the Dental Insurance would be separate and would not be connected with nor affect our self-funding. By changing to self-funding of our Medical costs we would need to replace our Dental Insurance since it is included in Prudential's package. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: (Continued) See Recommendations on following page /Z#~ e BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO Currently budgeted in each department under line item 1180. l . . . · Self-Funding of Group Health Insurance December 5, 1983 Page 2 The attached cost comparisons show the minimum savings the City would realize by self-funding the Medical costs. Transport's cost figures are based on claims reaching an aggregate stop-loss point. This places a limit on the City's total liability, and claims in excess of the stop-loss would be paid by the insurer. The cost comparisons for Dental Insurance show a substantial increase in cost with Transport Life. However, the increase in cost is due to an improved benefit schedule. Prudential's plan pays about 35% of dental expenses while Transport Life will pay 80%. We felt that our re-vamping of our Employees' Group Health Insurance should also include a better dental plan. . The Medical and Life benefits with Transport is in line with Prudential's benefits with one improvement. The maximum out of pocket expense for a covered member has been reduced from $1,600 to $600 per year. RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COUNCIL: 1. To authorize withdrawal from Prudential effective January 1, 1984. 2. To award the City's Group Health Insurance contract to Transport Life Insurance Company, effective January 1, 1984. 3. Determine individual employee contribution levels. Various levels of cost to the employees for dependent coverage is shown on a separate page. The amounts of the total cost that would be contributed by the employees is indicated. . EMPLOYEE GROUP INSURANCE COST COMPARISONS: 1984 PRUDENTIAL TRANSPORT LIFE **AMOUNT BUDGETED *Current Total Dependent Dependent Enrollment Enrollment MEDICAL & LIFE INSURANCE $389,666 $483,184 DENTAL 21,000 23,000 Current Dependent Enrollment Total Dependent 'Enrollment $346,352 $395,213 40,968 57,240 $200,000 10 11000 ~ These costs are total contributions by the City and the Employee based on rates in effect January 1, 1984. ; 2,4 5 J '--1- 1 ***190,000 ft.¡ Of) I ct.: () *The total costs shown includes employee contributions for dependent coverage of $138,498 for Medical Insurance and $11,000 for Dental Insurance. **The amounts budgeted is for the 1983-84 fiscal year while the cost projections are for the 1984 calendar year. ***This is the additional amount the Council earmarked for employee insurance. . . COST SHARING BY EMPLOYEE AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF CONTRIBUTION Number of Employees with Dependents: 155 MEDICAL: Contribution Level $25 per month $30 per month $35 per month $40 per month $45 per month $50 per month Total Contribution $46,500 55,800 65,100 74,400 83,700 93,000 I I ! f...., , -- '(...... DENTAL: . Dependent Status: Number of Employees with Spouse only: 46 Number of Employees with Children only: 12 Number of Employees with Spouse & Children: 97 TOTAL 155 Contribution Level . \ '\ .", \. \" ' .~. f..~~.. t...... l,·..- '/ r' /1" .# . (¡ v / L,¡ . \ '~ I ¡- t , C\ <~~ J j -:.... \;) / f' ;' 'l'4.; r,! C Spouse only: Total Contribution $8 per month ~ "~..-' ( (~ ) Children only: $10 per month Spouse & Children: $15 per month TOTAL $ 4,416 1,440 17,460 $23,316 The total contributions are based on the assumption of total dependent enrollment. . . ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BID SPECIFICATIONS . MINIMUM PREMIUM FUNDED PLAN .. . BIDDER INFORMATION: To be returned with Bid. 1. The insurer must have a Best Rating of A+ Excellent or better. 2. Bids must include Employees' Group Health, Dental, and Life Insurance plans. (See attached sheet for minimum Bid requirements). The contract policy period shall be for one year beginning January 1, 1984. 3. 4. The contract shall be non-cancellable by the insurer except in the case of failure on the part of the City to make remittances to the insurer in accordance with the terms of the contract. 5. The insurer shall provide all claims administration services and other functions normally provided under a fully insured plan. 6. Claims payments shall be made by the insurer within a twelve working day average turn-around time. The insurer shall issue drafts drawn on the City's non-insured bank account, on either a weekly or monthly basis, for claims paid by the insurer. 8. The insurer shall submit to the City monthly reports identifying each claim paid and supporting each draft drawn on the City's bank account. The insurer shall advise the City Personnel Director by telephone of the amount of each draft prior to the actual drafting of the City account. 9. The insurer shall purchase, or otherwise provide, on behalf of the City, re-insurance to cover claims in excess of the City's annual Aggregate Stop-Loss as indicated in the bid. Any such claims paid by the re-insurer shall not be counted toward the City's claims experience. 10. If the insurer requires fundsto be deposited by the City to provide a reserve for incurred but not reported (IBNR) claims expense, the insurer will pay to the City an annual interest of 10% on any such monies on deposit. 11 . Bids must include information supporting the insurer's ability to perform. Information must include, but is not limited to: (A) Reference list of current minimum premium funded accounts in the State of Texas. Bidder Acknowledged Tinitial ) ¡ . '. ~ . (B) Experience in developing and instituting minimum premium funded plans. (C) Name, location, and telephone number of the City's contact person/administrator. 12. The City reserves the right to refuse any and all bids. The City further reserves the right to award the contract to the Bidder whose proposal best serves the interest of the City. 13. Sealed Bids must be delivered prior to 10:00 A.M., November 30, 1983 to: Jeanette Moore City Secretary City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 . . Bidder Acknowledged (initial) . . . MINIMUM BID REQUIREMENTS HEALTH: - Maximum Benefit $1 ,000,000 - Calendar Year Deductible Individual Fami 1 y - Hospital Charges $100 $300 100% of First $2,500; 80% of charges between $2,500 - $5,000 100% for charges in excess of $5,000 Maximum out-of-pocket expense does apply. - All other charges 80% Deductible applies - Surgery Elective 80% UCR No Deductible Non-Elective 1 00% UCR Deductible applies - Pregnancy Coverage - New Born Coverage Paid as any other illness Included - Well Baby Care Sick Baby only - Pre-existing Coverage Covered if 90 days free of treatment or if a covered member for 12 months. - Additional Accident $500 (1 00%) 25 - Student Age Limit - Maximum Out-of-Pocket Expense $600 per calendar year per covered member. LIFE INSURANCE: 2 times annual salary to a maximum of $25,000 AD & D. · · · Minimum Bid Requirements Page 2 DENTAL INSURANCE: - Annual Maximum $1,500 $ 50 - Deductible (calendar year) - Co-insurance Basic Services Preventive Services Major Services 80% UCR 80% UCR 80% UCR ,- . ,CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North'Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. on July 25t 1983 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN Call to Order ~ Roll Call r Consideration of Removin Consent A enda From Consent A enda Item (s) PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-51, Re uest of Bob Hall for Short Form Plat of Lot 8, .-1=' . Block 1 Henrr Addition PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-55, Re uest of of Lots thru 12AR Block 30 Colle e Hill ---i Addition · ,Z I PLANNING.Þ ZONING - PS ---+~W.OOd Const.J"uction -'--i-n.a.t. 1 B 10 ck 12 _____~ North Addition 83-58~ Request of f" Company for Final Snow Hei hts - Page 2 .- ,CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North 'Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 ~.m. on July 25, 1983 NU1ßER ~ l' ITEM ACTION TAKEN PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-59 Re uest of Burk Collins Investments for Re lat of Lots 2R-1 & 2R-2 Block 6 Snow Hei. hts G o w Consideration of Ordinanc~ for PZ 83-42 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-449 Request of Burk Collins Investment to Rezone a Portion of Tract 13 J. H. Barlough Survey 9 Abstract 130 From Local Retail to 2F-9-Two Famil Loca~ed. on the South Side of Cha man RQad and Approximatel 500 feet ,West of Smithfield Road) --, ns·deration of Ordinance for PZ 83-44 .ag~ 3 ,CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North °Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on July 25. 1983 ITEM ~' HEARING, PZ 83-15, Request of William N. Garrison to Rezone Several Tracts in the T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, From IF-9-150Q-One Family Dwellings to 2F-9- Two Famil and Multi-Famil - uads . (Located A roximately 200 Feet East of Crane Road and Extends Eastward to A roximatel 200 Feet West of Precinct Line Road Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-15 Consideration of Grantin eal . I') ?~6 .- -v" Hearin for PZ 83-39 ~. · :~d3PO~S~ble Reconsideration of PZ 83-40 _~/'vJ - t:;";:t::::::~;n: w:::::~: For _ __ _ _ ~ -( --- --.-... *~~+conSideration . ¡ #l~ to Austin I i of $46.. 11.7 .73 ) .--+--- , ~~~ideration r ! of PartialJavment , Estimatª-. I _,.., Road Cornpª-!1Y. in the Arnoun~ --Rufe SnQw Drive Phase II of Partial Payment. .---....------- to A1t~tin Road Camp ____ .w_.aL $1?O,Q7? nR - Sn()w--H.p;E'ht~ Strppt & rovements ACTION TAKEN -..,---------.~- ..~----.- . -Page 4 . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. on July 25, 1983 NUMBER ITEM Consideration of Partial Pa Estimate #6, to Stolaruk Cor oration in the Amount of $186,433.14 - North Hills Street and * Consideration of Partial Pa ent Estimate #5 to Stolaruk Cor oration in-the Amount of 19 788.30 - Holida North Street and ~- Consideration of Awardin treet ~ ~ideration of Awardin Contract for ! Walker Branch rovements L-- J onsideration of Ordinance Amending ~ Ordinance #1 5 Subdivision Ordinance ..~ l cit~en PEesentat,io1J, f L nn Searc - Woman's Center Re: Allocation of Funds -- 28. j Adjournment .~~ ---I -- ACTION TAKEN ~~------- --- . . . . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, JUNE 27, 1983, 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m., June 27, 1983. 2. Dick Faram Jim Ramsey Jim Kenna Richard Davis J.C. Hubbard Marie Hinkle Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Present: Staff: Rodger Line Jeanette Moore Dennis Horvath Richard Albin Mike McEntire City Manager City Secretary Assistant City Manager City Engineer Acting City Attorney Absent: Dick Fisher Harold Newman Rex McEntire Councilman Councilman City Attorney Mayor Faram recognized Mr. Bill Rutledge and Mr. Thomas Holcomb, students at Columbia College majoring in Municipal Government, being taught by Mr. Dennis Horvath. 3. The invocation was given by Councilwoman Hinkle. 4. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey to approve the minutes of the recessed meeting, June 13, 1983. Motion carried 5-0. 5. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approved the minutes of the regular meeting June 13, 1983. Motion carried 5-0. 6. None 7. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to approve the consent agenda, items #22, 23, 24 and 25. Motion carried 5-0. L,l~ CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE RECESSED MEETING JUNE 13, 1983 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 13, 1983 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEM(S) FROM CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA , (ITEMS #22, 23, 24 AND 25) APPROVED I., .s. Mayor Faram advised that on the recommendation of Councilman Dick Fisher, liaison to the Civil Service Commission, he would appoint Mr. Jeff Newsom and asked the Council to ratify the appointment. Council ratified the appointmen~. 9. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to appoint the following persons to the Cable Advisory Panel for two year terms: Ray Fulenwider, Norman Ellis, Nancy Gum and Councilwoman Marie Hinkle. Motion carried 5-0 10. Mayor Faram advised the Council that Councilman Newman, liaison to the Board of Adjustment had recommended the re-appointment of Harold Schubert, two year term and the appointment of Hans Kossler, two year term. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve the appointments. Motion carried 5-0. .11. Mr. Joe Hipple, Vice President, CBS/Black Hawk, appeared before the Council and made the following presentation: . Joe Hipple stated, I have been before you many times in the past with more pleasant items. Unfortunately I am here for a not so pleasant one, but a vital one in the interest of maintaining the standard of service in North Richland Hills through cable television and that is to seek an increase in our rates from their present structure to a new structure we proposed several months ago. You do have the recommendation of the consultant and I don't want to be repetitious on the information you already have. We had the public hearing in Haltom City approximately three weeks ago and they passed the increase. We agreed to lower the rate for the pay TV on additional outlets from $5.00 to $3.00 and that is something that we could do in North Richland Hills also. The rate increase is necessary for our company. One of the reasons is we have not come before you in the four years we have been operating, although we are allowed to according to the franchise. We tried to hold our rates as long as possible before seeking an increase in order to give the best deal possible to the citizens of North Richland Hills. In the last four years inflation in the United States has increased 44%. In the Dallas/Fort Worth area it has been hit with over 50%. Even though inflation rose to such a height we kept up our service. In the meantime our electric rates have gone up 56%, telephone 87%, and planning to rise again. The cost of our service call has gone up 24%. That is, servicing a home which we do not charge for Page 2 June 27, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO CABLE ADVISORY PANEL APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF ADJUST- MENT APPROVED PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST OF CBS/BLACK HAWK COMMUNICATIONS FOR RATE INCREASE (RECÉSSED AT THE JUNE 13, 1983 MEETING) . . . for when they have problems with their cable, regardless if it is the fault of the subscriber through someone accidently breaking it. We made those calls free of charge. Our cost of installation has gone up over 20%, but we are not seeking an increase in those rates. We still want to make it easy for the people to get on the service so we intend to keep the installation rate the same rate they were four years ago. Our converter repairs, which is the box that brings in all the channels through the TV set, have been tremendous. In 1982, for misuse of converts, we 'spent $41,000. To date this year we have spent $35,000 and not half of the year is over. Property taxes were a big surprise to us last year when we received a 200% increase in our property taxes to the District. Our program related expenses for the programs that we bring have risen on the average of 15% to 20%. Our program expenses that we were getting at a very normal charge are going up drastically this fall. One being ESPN, which we have been receiving free, now is going to start charging us ten cents a month for each subscriber. Our MTV is going to start charging on a per subscriber basis, which we think is going to be around $0.50 per month. Copy right fees have risen from $21,000 to over a $100,000 in the last four years. We had an automatic pass through of copy right fees in our franchise agreement and we never enacted that pass through in order to keep the rates down for all the citizens. We have maintained a high level of community service to each of our cities and maintained a high profile and have given them anything they wanted as far as access and a good local regionation and local programming. One of the newest things we are doing is the RYA games and intend to cover the all star games and the play-offs. They have been on every Saturday morning. Local regionation in North Richland Hills has approached over $30,000 per year in special programs just for the City. Of course we intend to continue this. We have donated over $30,000 to local charities in benefits that we have been asked to support. We have installed all of the schools in the Birdville School District. We wired the schools more than what the franchise requires us to. Tarrant County Junior College has a two- way active line between our tower site and the college was done at a cost of over $15,000 and we did that three years ago and they have been able to go live with programming out of the college. We feel our rate request is very reasonable based on not coming before you in four years and when you take our request it breaks down to a little over 7% per year, which is very reasonable. Even with this increase we are still going to be below the Texas average for similar or even less services than ours. The Texas average rate is $9.25 and we won't be approaching that. We are asking for $8.59 on basic. We experienced a total loss in 1981 and 1982 in North Richland Hills of 1.2 million dollars and the loss in all of the systems in Hurst, Keller, North Richland Hills and Haltom City was over 3.3 million dollars in the last three years. With the increase we are going to receive a 7% retainer in our investment. Anyone of you business men know you can't operate a business on 7% return, yet that is what we are going to get under the increase. Briefly, that is the reason we are coming to you. We wish we could avoid it but we are in a position where we can't right now. Pag e 3 June 27, 1983 . . . Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked what the basic included. Mr. Hipple stated the basic was approximately 26 channels. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked if it included Cinemax, Home Box Office or Showtime. Mr. Hipple stated no, those were premium channels. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he felt the Council had made a mistake in not letting the Cable Advisory Committee be a part of this process. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he felt it should be a matter of record that the commit~ee was not given the opportunity to be a part of the discussion. Mr. Hipple stated he had attended the last two meetings of the Cable Advisory Committee. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mr. Hipple if he had any statistics on the percentage of coverage for city versus city. Mr. Hipple stated that all the cities in the northern area in the CBS/Black Hawk system were averaging 50%. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that Mr. Hipple had said in a letter sent to the City that they had never charged for additional outlets but would start charging $5.00 per service on July 1, 1983 and he understood that had been changed to $3.00 for Haltom City. Mr. Hipple stated that was correct. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked what the charge actually was for. Mr. Hipple stated the charge was for additional outlets for the Pay Television. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked if the charge was for the box and not the channels. Mr. Hipple stated it was for per channel, per month. Councilman Hubbard asked if it was for per outlet. Mr. Hipple stated it was per pay service. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that if a person had Home Box Office Showtime and Cinemax it would be three time three and not three times the box. Mr. Hipple stated that was correct. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked what would be wrong with keeping the basic the same and the people that desired Home Box Office or Cinemax, let them pay and not spread the cost to everyone. Page 4 June 27, 1983 . . . Mr. Hipple stated it would be impossible for the company to operate on the revenues from only the Pay Television. ~ayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated there was some question as to whether the City should have put the cable out for rebidding. Mr. Hipple stated that was the City's prerogative, but did not feel the service would be as satisfactory. Councilman Kenna stated that Mr. Hipple mentioned that the increase would only amount to 7% per year, but it would actually amount to about 70% which was about 17~ percent if a person had more than one converter. Mr. Hipple stated it would be about 44%. Councilman Kenna stated that in that case it would be about a 70% to those that had more than one box and about 28% to those with only one. Mr. Hipple stated that he would be willing to negotiate this particular rate incre.ase. Haltom City had expressed the same concern and it had been decreased to $3.00. Councilman Kenna stated he did not have a problem with the basic rate request but the charge for additional outlets looked a little out of proportion. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated the only thing the City controlled was the basic rate and the additional outlets. Theoretically, the rated for additional service was between the cable com- panies and FCC. Mr. Hipple stated that as a company they did not support that bill and would not raise the rates without coming to the City first. Councilman Davis asked what the proposed $0.50 charge for converter box maintenance was for. Mr. Hipple stated that unfortunately some tried to rework the converters to obtain additional services and when they did it damaged the converters and it cost the company $12.00 to have them repaired. Councilman Davis stated he felt they were really just putting $0.50 on to the basic rate with charge. Mr. Hipple stated it could have been included in the basic rate, but they were trying to specify what the charges were. Page 5 June 27, 1983 . Councilman Davis stated he felt that if someone broke or damaged a converter they should have to pay for it and not everyone if nothing was wrong with their converter. Councilman Davis stated that with this charge he could pay for a new converter in two years. Mr. Hipple stated the converters cost $78.00. Councilman Davis asked what the $12.00 represented. Mr. Hipple stated that was the cost to repair them. Councilman Davis stated that still in two years he would be paying the cost of repair and nothing would be wrong with the converter. Mayor Faram advised Councilman Davis to confine his questions to the rate increase because this type of discussion was really in the negotiating process as opposed to the rate request. Mayor Faram stated he had been asked to call on the Chairman of the Cable Advisory Committee for any comments from the committee. Mrs. Beverly Riley, Chairman, appeared before the Council. 4IÞ Mrs. Riley stated that Mr. Hipple and Mr. Mohand both had attended the last two meetings of the committee and answered several questions. Mrs. Riley stated the committee had studied the rate request and felt there was some justification in the basic request. Mrs. Riley stated the committee felt that CBS/Black Hawk could "and should make some improvements in the basic service. Mrs. Riley stated the committee recommended that the Council get a specific commitment from CBS/Black Hawk to complete improvements in the basic service. Mayor Faram asked if the committee would go along with the rate request if a commitment was made on specific improvements. Mrs. Riley stated yes, the committee would like for the directory service, and the weather channel to be improved and religious programs activated. Mrs. Riley stated she realized the religious leaders would have to activate the religious programs. Mayor Faram asked if these requests had been discussed with CBS. Mrs. Riley stated yes. Mayor Faram asked what their response was. Mrs. Riley stated they did not ask for responses. . Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mrs. Riley if the main thing the committee wanted was the directory and weather service. Page 6 June 27, 1983 . . Mrs. Riley replied yes. Mr. Hipple stated that there had been a problem with the radar and they took it off. It was in the capital budget for next year. Mr. Hipple stated they were working with a company on the directory service and it should be on by early. fall. Mr. Hipple stated the religious channel was still open. It was up to the religious leaders to use it. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he felt the weather radar and directory service should be tied to a date as to when it would be in service. Mayor Faram stated he would recommend the Council approve the request as written or postpone it in favor of a negotiating session. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Hipple if that would be satis- factory with him. Mr. Hipple stated they were in a time constraint and would appreciate action on the request now. Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Mayor Faram called a ten minute recess. Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council members and Staff were present as listed at the beginning of the meeting. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve the basic request for a rate increase and reduce from $5.00 to $2.00 for the additional charge for each converter. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to amend the motion, by adding that the directory service and weather radar be added no later than 180 days after the rate increase July 4, 1983. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked Mr. McEntire if the City could rescind the rate increase if the services were not in effect within 180 days. Mr. McEntire stated the Council could attempt to rescind it. Councilman Kenna stated that no one likes rate increases but felt a company could not operate based on rates four years ago. Councilman Hubbard stated that he felt CBS/Black Hawk had been very forward with the City and if they said they were 4IÞ going to have the requested services in 180 days they would. Page 7 June 27, 1983 RECESS BACK TO ORDER Amended motion carried 5-0. 4IÞ -Original motion carried 5-0. . 13. .' 12. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Thomas Elting, 6633 Grapevine Highway, appeared before the Council, representing Dr. Anderson. Mr. Elting stated that Dr. Anderson wanted to build a veter- inarian clinic. Mr. Elting stated the site where Dr. Anderson wanted to build was at the far north city limits of North Richland Hills. Mr. Elting stated the clinic would be for small and large animals and would be an asset to the City. Dr. Anderson appeared before the Council. Dr. Anderson asked the Council to give his request kind consideration. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Ordinance No. 1036. Motion carried 5-0. 14. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. John Parish, 5137 Davis Boulevard, appeared before the Council. Mr. Parish stated he had developed Meadowview Estates, Phase I and II, which was next to the property they were requesting to be rezoned. Mr. Parish stated he had made some written agreements if the zoning was approved, and that being the first three lots facing on Rumfield would have homes a minimum of 2,000 square feet and would be deed restricted. Mr. Parish stated he had also agreed to cul-de-sac Ellis Drive. Councilman Hubbard asked what the size the back yard would be on IF-8 lot. Mr. Parish stated there would be plenty of back yard. Councilman Hubbard asked if some of the houses would be two story. Page 8 June 27, 1983 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-35, REQUEST OF DAN J. ANDERSON, D.V.M. TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 10F, THOMAS PECK SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1210, FROM AGRICUL- TURE TO COMMERCIAL (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD APPROXI- MATELY 600 FEET NORTH OF THE INTER- SECTION OF SHADY GROVE AND DAVIS BOULEVARD) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-35 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 1036 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-36, REQUEST OF P & S CONSTRUC- TION COMPANY TO REZONE TRACT 13A, STEPHEN RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1266, AND A PORTION OF LOT 4 AND LOTS 5 THRU 7, BLOCK 1, MEADOWVIEW ESTATES FROM AGRICULTURE, IF-12 AND 1F-9 TO IF-8-1600 AND IF-S- 1800-0NE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RUMFIELD ROAD, EXTENDS APPROXI- MATELY 1,090 FEET AND APPROXIMATELY 666 FEET EAST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD) . . . Mr. Parish stated yes, the ones on Rumfield probably would be. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 15. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to approve PZ 83-36, Ordinance No. 1037. Motion carried 5-0. 16. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Gordon Swift, Engineer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Swift stated that the original request was for 1,400 square foot homes but they had agreed to build 1,500 square foot as recommended by Planning and Zoning. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked if they had agreed to build 1,500 square feet. Mr. Swift stated they had agreed to 1F-8-1500. Mayor Faram asked if this property was located in the flight pattern to the north-south run-way to the airport. Mr. Smith stated yes, it was to the north of the airport. Mayor Faram asked if it was off the end of the run-way a certain number of feet. Mr. Swift stated it was a couple of thousand feet off the run- way. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 17. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to approve PZ 83-37, Ordinance No. 1038, with the stipulation of IF-8-1500. Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire what the City's liability was, if any, making it known that this was a dangerous place to live. Mr. McEntire stated the City would not be liable. Motion carried 5-0. Page 9 June 27, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-36 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 1037 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-37, REQUEST OF DOMINION PROPER- TIES TO REZONE TRACTS 7E, 7F, & 7K, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY ABSTRACT 1055, FROM AGRICULTURE TO IF-8- 1400-0NE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MARTIN ROAD, BOUNDED ON THE WEST AND NORTH BY GLENANN ADDITION AND APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF CRANE ROAD) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-37 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 1038 .8. . . Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Councilman Davis asked to be excused from the Council table because of a possible conflict of interest. Mayor Faram excused Councilman Davis. Mr. Frank Kimmell, Trustee, appeared before the Council. Mr. Kimmell stated that to the east of this tract it was undeveloped, but zoned 2F-9; the southeast corner was zoned commercial; to the south it was zoned industrial, southwest North Park Estates which was zoned IF-7 and on the west Richfield Park zoned agriculture. Mr. Kimmell stated they were requesting three different levels of zoning on this tract, on the north of Chapman IF-9 with 1,500 square feet minimums. Mr. Kimmell stated that according to the tax records 92% of the existing homes in this area were 1,600 square feet. Mr. Kimmell stated that where his property adjoined North Park Estates they planned to put IF-8-1400. Mr. Kimmell stated that for the balance of the tract they had originally requested IF-8- 1200 and in discussion with the Planning and Zoning Commission agreed to change it to IF-8-1300. Mr. Kimmell stated there had been discussion in the past on a north/south collector street and thought Little Ranch Road had been planned originally as a collector street. However, they proposed to plat Fox Hollow Lane as a collector street. Mr. Kimmell stated that there was presently a flood problem related to this tract. M~st of the tract drained in a south- westerly direction in a y-inlet in North Park Estates. Mr. Kimmell stated his drainage and storm sewer plan would divert the run off directly into the creek in the park. Mr. Kimmell stated he felt this zoning request was constant with or greater than the zoning in the area at the present time. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked if the drainage would flow thru the park to the creek. Mr. Kimmell stated it would be underground drainage. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked the total number of homes there would be. Mr. Kimmell stated two hundred sixty-nine. Page 10 June 27, 1983 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-40, REQUEST OF FRANK KIMMELL, TRUSTEE, TO REZONE TRACTS 12 & 12A, JOHN BARLOUGH SURVEY ABSTRACT 130 AND TRACT 2, WILLIAM MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1010, FROM AGRICULTURE TO IF- 9-1500, IF-8-1400 AND IF-8-1200 ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHAPMAN ROAD AND BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY RICHFIELD PARK) . , .19. 21. . Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Mr. Fred Livingston, 6401 Little Ranch Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Livingston stated he opposed making Little Ranch Road a through street and he felt there would be too much traffic. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Livingston what he proposed as an alternate. Mr. Livingston stated Fox Hollow. Mayor Faram stated the streets would be addressed in the platting process. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Albin if Little Ranch Road had ever been designated as a collector street. Mr. Albin stated no. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to approve PZ 83-40, Ordinance No. 1039, with the stipulation of IF-9-1500 and IF-8-1500. Motion carried 4-0. Councilman Davis returned to the Council table. 20. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Bobby McMillan, with Folsom Investment, appeared before the Council. Mr. McMillan stated the reason for this zoning request was to straighten up the boundary lines and have a more usable size tract. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PZ 83-41, Ordinance No. 1040. Motion carried 5-0. Page 11 June 27, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF ORD INANCE FOR PZ 83-40 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 1039 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-41, REQUEST OF FOLSOM INVESTMENTS, INCORPORATED, TO REZONE 1.44 ACRES OUT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WALKER BRANCH ADDITION FROM MULTI- FAMILY TO LOCAL RETAIL (LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTHWEST OF HIGHWAY 26 ON EMERALD HILLS WAY) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-41 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 1040 .*22. *23. *24. *25. . . 26. Mr. Gary Teague, Consulting Engineer, representing Mr. Flories appeared before the Council. Mr. Teague stated Mr. Flories owned property in Holiday West that was zoned for apartments. Mr. Teague stated there would be approximately 220 units. Mr. Teague stated Mr. Flories had a particular type of apartment he desired to build and the exterior of the buildings would be 30.2% brick, 52.8% stucco and 16.9% wood. Mr. Teague stated that each apartment unit would contain a smoke detector. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard to deny this request. Motion carried 5-0. 27. Not present. Page 12 June 27, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF BUDGET SUPPLEMENT FOR THE LIBRARY APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR SEAL COAT APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #5, IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,406.82 TO STOLARUK-NORTH HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVE- MENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ,ESTIMATE 114, IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,034.30 TO STOLARUK-HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF B. R. FLORIES FOR A VARIANCE TO THE BRICK ORDINANCE DENIED CITIZEN PRESENTATION MR. GARY BRYANT - T.C.O.A.D.A. RE: SUPPORT FROM ALCOHOL TAX FUNDS . . . Mrs. Patricia Pettit, 3736 Kris, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Pettit stated she was having a problem with her neighbor's cats and dogs coming into her yard. Mr. Pettit stated some ordinance should be passed to make the owners keep their cats up. Mr. Line stated he would like to point out that sometime ago the Council did revise the animal control ordinance making it a requirement that cat owners keep their cats up and licensed and under control under the same manner that presently requires them to keep dogs. Mr. Line stated the ordinance had not been enforced yet because the City felt the citizens should be made aware of it. Mr. Line stated the target date for beginning to enforce the ordinance was October 1, 1983. Mrs. Pettit asked if she could rent a cat-catcher cage and catch them herself because they were just as prone to have rabies as dogs, and have the City pick the cat up. Mr. McEntire stated that you did not have to have an Animal Control Officer come out and pick up the cat if you knew who it belonged to. You could file a complaint. Mayor Faram asked if the City could take the cat if caught in a cage. Mr. McEntire stated there might be a problem with taking some- one elses cat. Mr. Pettit stated another problem she had was mosquitoes caused by Fossil Creek. Mrs. Pettit asked if the City could spray at least twice a week. Mr. Line stated he would check on the possibility of spraying twice a week. Mr. Frank Kimmell appeared before the Council. Mr. Kimmell stated that the motion on PZ 83-40 was different than what he had asked for and he would like for the Council to rescind the motion and let him resubmit the request. Mayor Faram asked for a motion from the Council on reconsideration of Mr. Kimmell's request. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to reconsider PZ 83-40. Motion failed. Page 13 June 27, 1983 Page 14 June 27, 1983 . 29. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of June 27, 1983. ADJOURNMENT Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary . . .... . -CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North 'Richland Hills City Hall Coùncil Chambers. 7J01 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on AU2ust 8. 1983 h11MBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 2. Roll Call·- " Invocation 4. Consideration of Minutes of the Re ular 25 1983 n ideration of Removin rom Consent A enda 10 19 20 & 12 13 14 15 - - . _-'I~-- -. -".----..--. --. -- ---. - -_._~- - _._- NG - PS 83-60. Reouest ots lR. 2~ * * f R1nrk 11 r ~lp~rview~ · · -~9--t f t 'PT,ANNTNr. & ZONING - PS 83-61. Request of-¡· ~] -- . Page 2 -CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North'Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on August 8, 1983 NUMBER * ITEM NG - PS g3-67 Re uest of Wa e E. Waters for Final Plat of Lots 26 thru 29 Block 15 ACTION TAKEN * ING & ZONING - PS "83-69 Re uest of o hwood Plaza Ltd. for Final Plat of Block 13 Snow Hei hts ion - PS 83-71 Re uest of for Final Plat k 6 Industrial * * npvplopmpnt Company for Final Plat 1<. _~_ Consider~tion of Ordinance Amending -------J--- Water & Sewer Policies '~l~- · Consideration of Ordinance for Contract I for Codification of Ordinances e-' "'--+ ~ 'I Page 3 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . For the Meeting conducted at the North 'Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on August 8, 1983 Nffi"IBER ITEM * Purchase of * ment in the ve ~18. Consideration of Partial Pa ment, Estimate 116 to Austin Road Com an in the Amount of 209 261.59 - Snow Hei hts . rovements *19. onsideration of Partial Pa s.t'tima t e 115 to Universal Tank & Iron =_+:~ s in the Amount of 50 544.00 Boulevard 2.0 M.G. Elevated Stora el ~ n f Awardin Bid for 150' ~=±_Free Standi~ower ~2.l.-.+~,p~oPoßed Use Hearing'~J283-84 Revenue --t---.., ---4- Sharin~ Allocation -- --f-- i I "-.2.2--t- c.on!';; deration of Appointments to Board · ,_ o__~ Añju!';tment .----4- _' 1- --- -- ACTION TAKEN -. \ .. . ,. Page 4 . ,CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on August 8, 1983 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN - rn,.,(:;nPT~r;nn of Mav Advertising for a . ?~ . 'R;'l'hn~T~ ~;(tn 24 Consideration of .Request of D andF Development Incorporation for a Variance. from the Brick Ordinance 2£).. Consideration of Resolution on Indústrial DeveloDment Bonds for Graham Magnetics Yroiect *1(.. -Consideration of Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 658 -Regulating Amusement - Centers 27. Citizen Presentation 28. Recess 29. Executive Session to Discuss Land, I ..11-.£igation and/or Personnel - 30. Adjournment 'w- I ~~' - - f . - 1 -= . . . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 ON JULY 25, 1983 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order July 25, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim Ramsey Jim Kenna Richard Davis J.C. Hubbard Dick Fisher Harold Newman Marie Hinkle Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: Rodger N. Line Jeanette Moore Dennis Horvath Gene Riddle Mike McEntire Richard Albin Lou Spiegel City Manager City Secretary Assistant City Manager Director Public Works/Utility Acting City Attorney City Engineer Finance Director Planning & Zoning Member: Margie Nash Absent: Rex McEntire City Attorney 3. The invocation was given by Councilman Kenna. 4. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting June 27, 1983. Motion carried 5-0; Councilman Fisher and Councilman Newman abstaining due to absence from the meeting. Mayor Faram advised the Council that there were a number of citizens present in reference to Item #15 on the agenda and asked for a motion for that item to be heard at this time. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to hear Item #15 at this time. Motion carried 7-0. ~) CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 27, 1983 APPROVED . 15. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. No one appeared. Mayor Faram stated that because the item had been moved up rebuttal time would be reserved for the applicant and they would hear from those who opposed at this time. Mrs. Cleta Oggier, 6821 Precinct Line Road, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Oggier stated that her property adjoined the property in question. Mrs. Oggier stated that she was against the request because it would cause more traffic and also because of the water situation. Mrs. Oggier stated there were no parks in the area for the children that would be living in the development. Mrs. Oggier stated there would also be a parking problem. Mrs. Oggier stated the schools were already overcrowded and there were no crosswalks on Precinct Line Road for the children to cross the street. Mrs. Oggier stated that there were no plans to widen Precinct Line Road until 1990. Mrs. Oggier stated that Mr. Garrison wanted to build duplexes because of the cost of development. 4IÞ Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Oggier if she had a water problem. Mrs. Oggier stated yes, she lived on the hill and had low water pressure. Mayor Faram asked if the area was serviced by a 2" water line. Mr. Riddle stated yes. Mr. James Roberson, 6463 Chilton, appeared before the Council. Mr. Roberson stated the development would cause much more traffic in the area. Mr. Roberson stated he did not want to see the area downgraded from single family dwellings. Mrs. Kathy Roberson, 6463 Chilton, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Roberson stated they did not need more families piled on top of one another, the area did not need it. Mr. Joe Coulson, 6805 Crane Road, appeared before the Council. . Mr. Coulson stated that he was a builder and knowing some of the costs on this property the applicant would do quite well Page 2 July 25, 1983 PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL HEARING PZ 83-15, REQUEST OF WILLIAM N. GARRISON TO REZONE SEVERAL TRACTS IN THE T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, FROM IF-9-1500-0NE FAMILY DWELLINGS TO 2F-9- TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MULTI-FAMILY QUADS (LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET EAST OF CRANE ROAD AND EXTENDS EASTWARD TO APPROXI- MATELY 200 FEET 'WEST OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD) . on the development of the land. Mr. Coulson stated that if the owners were to sell their lots on a single family basis and build 1,700 square foot homes, he would have no problem selling them and could make quite a bit of money. Mr. Coulson stated they were tired of defending the neighborhood and had some suggestions to make to the Council. Mr. Coulson stated they would like a vote by the Council against any type of development on the aforementioned property that had anything to do with multi-family and accept nothing less than 1,700 square foot single family homes. Mr. Coulson stated that he realized Mr. Garrison had a financial investment in the property, but he also had an investment in his home. Mr. Coulson stated the area was overcrowded and there was a water problem. Mayor Faram advised Mr. Coulson that the property was presently zoned 1F-9-1500. Mr. Coulson stated that he would take 1F-9-1500 over multi- family. Mayor Faram stated that since Mr. Coulson was a builder, did he feel there was a market for single family homes. Mr. Coulson replied yes. . Councilman Davis stated that the property was zoned 1F-9- 1500, but most builders would build over 1,500. Mr. Coulson asked that if the property were zoned for multi- family, could apartments be built. Mayor Faram stated multi-family was multi-family but there was a different zoning for duplexes or two-family type. Mayor Faram stated that in answer to his question, yes, it would be 19.4 units per acre under the present ordinance. Councilman Kenna stated that he wanted to clarify what Mr. Coulson would like for the Council to do, and that was to put this to bed forever. Councilman Kenna stated the Council could only take action that addressed this one item and if the property were sold or the applicant came back in six months the Council would be faced with the same issue again. Mr. William Perkins, Jr., 740 Aspen Court, Hurst, appeared before the Council. . Mr. Perkins stated that this property was located across the street from him. Mr. Perkins stated the development would cause more traffic and Precinct Line Road was not scheduled to be improved in the next ten years. Mr. Perkins stated this would set a precedence, it would be the first apartments on Precinct Line Road. Mr. Perkins stated it would also cause more traffic, overcrowd the schools and add Page 3 July 25, 1983 . . . to the water and drainage problems. Mr. Perkins stated that Precinct Line Road was not scheduled to improve for at least ten years. Mayor Faram stated that Precinct Line Road was owned by the City of Hurst and North Richland Hills would not be funding any part of it. Mr. Perkins asked if all of Precinct was owned by Hurst. Mayor Faram stated yes, and development of the street would be up to Hurst. Mr. Gerald Stewart, 8840 Main, appeared before the Council. Mr. Stewart asked for rebuttal time since Mr. Garrison was now present. Mayor Faram granted rebuttal. Mr. Stewart stated the Council had been petitioned to reject this zoning change because, number one, the pyramid effect. Mr. Stewart stated that when this area of land was being discussed it was not only Mr. Garrison's property, but Mr. Rust's and Mrs. Ekrut's. Mr. Stewart stated that Mr. Rust owned about 6.41 acres adjacent to Mr. Garrison's property that was already zoned multi-family and Mr. Ekrut had bought adjoining land and told him personally that she planned to build duplexes. Mr. Stewart stated he felt it would scar the area to put apartments in. Mr. Stewart stated it had been mentioned to him that there could be a bond election to improve the road and the utilities and it would be an insult to the people in the GlenAnn Addition to vote yes on a bond issue so Mr. Garrison would have utilities to build apartments and multi- complexes. Mr. Stewart stated that the City's Zoning Ordinance stated that multi-family zoning shall be located near a major thoroughfare and preferably joining business zoning. Mr. Stewart stated there were no major thoroughfares or business zoned property in the area. Mr. Stewart stated that Mr. Garrison was proposing something that was not congenial to the area. Mr. Stewart stated the development would cause more traffic and add to the drainage problem. Mr. Stewart stated the land was not best suited for multi-family. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Stewart if the comment he made on a bond issue to improve the water and sewer facilities, was that it would be foolish to vote for it to help Mr. Garrison. Page 4 July 25, 1983 . . . Mr. Stewart stated no, it was suggested to him that a bond election would make it more conducive to development and it would be an insult to their intelligence to vote for, so Mr. Garrison could have his multi-family zoning. Mayor Faram stated that bonding on water and sewer was not an elective situation, it was a revenue bond and not a general obligation bond. Mr. Earl Region, 7200 Evergreen, appeared before the Council. Mr. Region stated he owned the property due south of the proposed zoning change. Mr. Region stated that this development would be putting more water through his property. Mayor Faram stated the drainage would be resolved when the platting was done, the zoning was what was being considered at this time. Mr. Oscar Oggier, 6821 Precinct Line Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Oggier stated he was not asking that Mr. Garrison be denied the use of his land, but against the request as presented. Mr. Oggier stated it would be a mistake to put that many residences on the property. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward. Mr. William Garrison appeared before the Council. Mr. Garrison stated he would like to clarify that the request related only to his property, 17 acres, 54 lots. Mr. Garrison stated his property and Mr. Rust's property had been computed and 'it would permit 204 residential units. Mr. Garrison stated they had projected a joint development and Mr. Rust would develop his land with a duplex, quadroplex compatibility and reduce the density. Mr. Garrison stated the total number of units would be 220 units, an increase of 16 units that is permitted under the, present ordinance. Mr. Garrison stated single family units would be built surrounding the duplexes and quadroplex. Mr. Garrison stated he felt this was a reasonable request. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked about the residential units. Mr. Garrison stated 54 units could be built on his property under the present zoning and 19.8 units under Mr. Rust's existing zoning. Page 5 July 25, 1983 · · · Councilwoman Hinkle asked Mr. Garrison how long he had owned the property. Mr. Garrison stated four or five years. Councilwoman Hinkle asked Mr. Garrison if he did not feel he could build single family residences. Mr. Garrison stated that for single family the economics were different. Mr. Garrison stated he had spent two years working on just the drainage and that caused him to change his plans. There being no one else present wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey read the following letter into the records: Due to a conflicting meeting we are unable to be at the Council meeting tonight, and would appreciate this letter being read. We reside at 8920 and 8912 Martin Lane in North Richland Hills, Texas, and are very interested in the proposed zoning case affecting the property between Crane Road and Precinct Line Road. Martin Lane has become a major traffic artery for traffic out of the GlenAnn Addition, thru traffic from Davis to Precinct (both ways) and even traffic from some of the new sub-divisions farther north. Even now there are three additional sub-divisions being developed between Eden Road and Precinct Line Road. We both feel it is imperative that additional streets be developed to Precinct Line Road. Most tracts on Precinct Line Road in that area are small tracts under separate ownership and will be very unlikely to dedicate streets without condemnation procedures. Therefore we both would like to go on record as favoring the zoning change to allow th~ street from Crane to Precinct Line Road. Neither of us have any present or future intended interest in said tracts of land. Respectfully yours, - Jack Roseberry and Lee Roy Bonham. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Faram granted rebuttal time. Mr. Gerald Stewart appeared before the Council. Page 6 July 25, 1983 . Mr. Stewart stated that if this request was granted, a disaster was about to happen. Mr. Coulson appeared before the Council Mr. Coulson stated that a quote made in Mr. Roseberry's letter said he was not interested in that land, that might be true, but Mr. Roseberry was in real estate sales and leasing. Mr. Coulson stated that one must remember that leasing was a very attractive interest in quadroplexes. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for a point of order in due respect because what Mr. Roseberry said was not part of the discussion. Mayor Faram stated he would rule in favor of Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, because Mr. Roseberry's statement was only for the record because he was unable to attend the meeting. Mr. Coulson stated he would like to mention that in Tarrant County there were 1,200 multi-family permits issued between January and June of this year and 1,183 single family permits issued. Mr. Coulson stated there was a great need for single family housing. . Michelle Birmingham, 8425 Randy Drive, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Birmingham stated that Mr. Garrison was going to build single family around the multi-family and asked how many people would buy the single family dwellings. Mr. Bill Collins, 8844 Main, appeared before the Council. Mr. Collins stated that according to his information none of the Council members lived in Smithfield, so if this request was approved he did not think they would get any support on their re-election. Mayor Faram stated that every Councilman was interested in the entire City, there was no Smithfield, Texas, as such and he resented it because it polarized the community with people bringing up the idea of Smithfield. Mayor Faram stated all the members had an interest in the City and he hoped what they did tonight was not based on the purpose of re-election but what was best for the whole City including the integrity of the neighborhood. . Councilman Hubbard stated that in the past he had voted for some apartment complexes and against some. Councilman Hubbard stated that when he did vote he was taking into consideration the entire City and not just the people in the southeast, northeast or southwest. Councilman Hubbard stated that he looked at any issue he did not appreciate being threatened on re-election. Page 7 July 25, 1983 · · · Councilman Kenna stated he thought all members approached these issues with an open mind but it was very difficult to keep an open mind about the issues when you are threatened by people who get involved only when they are here for one issue. Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 16. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to deny PZ 83-15, Ordinance No. 1041. Mayor Faram stated the current Zoning Ordinance addressed this issue very well, it states that multi-family zoning should be on major thoroughfare and he did not see the property in question located on a major thoroughfare. Mayor Faram stated that should this request be granted he could see a lot of traffic going through neighborhood streets. Mayor Faram stated that evidence had been presented tonight that Hurst would not develop Precinct Line Road before 1990. Mayor Faram stated his interest was in trying to keep the traffic on what would be a thoroughfare and he did not see a thoroughfare adjacent to the property. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Faram called a ten minute recess Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council Members and Staff were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. 5. Councilman Davis removed Item #7. 6. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Newman to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 7. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to approve PS 83-51, subject to all engineers' comments. Motion carried 7-0. Page 8 July 25, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-15 ORDINANCE NO. 1041 DENIED RECESS BACK TO ORDER CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEMS (S) FROM CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) (8, 9, 10, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, & 26) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-51, REQUEST OF BOB HALL FOR SHORT FORM PLAT OF LOT 8, BLOCK 1, HENRY ADDITION APPROVED · · · *10. *8. *9. 11. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mrs. Myrtis Byrd, 8320 Little Dude Court, appeared before Council Mrs. Byrd stated they presently had a rent-a-car business and were going to clos~ it down. Mrs. Byrd stated they would like to sell the cars that had been rent cars. Mrs. Byrd stated this would be the best use of the property. Councilman Fisher asked if the lot would be fully developed, and a paved lot. Mrs. Byrd stated yes. Councilman Kenna stated that the Planning and Zoning had passed the request with the stipulation after 12 months of operation the cars would be no older than 3 years. Councilman Kenna asked Mrs. Byrd if she agreed with the stipulation. Mrs. Byrd replied yes. Page 9 July 25, 1983 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-55, REQUEST OF CHARLES OWEN COMPANY FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 10AR THRU 12AR, BLOCK 30, COLLEGE HILL ADDITION APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-58, REQUEST OF CHASEWOOD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 12, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-59, REQUEST OF BURK COLLINS INVESTMENTS FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 2R-l & 2R-2, BLOCK 6, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-42, REQUEST OF DOYNE S. BYRD TO REZONE LOT 3R, BLOCK 23, CLEARVIEW ADDITION FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO COMMERCIAL- SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF USED AUTOS (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY AT MAPLEWOOD DRIVE) . . . Councilman Newman asked if the lot would be for the rent cars only. Mrs. Byrd stated no, that if it was feasible they would stay 'in the used car business. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 12. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to deny PZ 83-42, Ordinance No. 1042. Councilman Davis stated that he would like to point out that it was almost impossible to police the age of the cars and felt it would be an eyesore in the City. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that he had all the ordinances on used car lots pulled and they all read different. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that he did not feel the burden should be put on the City staff to keep a check on the car lots and approving this request would just add to the problem. Motion carried 7-0. 13. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Burk Collins, Developer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Collins stated he felt this zoning would be the best use of the property. Mr. Collins stated the adjacent property was zoned for duplexes. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 14. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Davis to approve PZ 83-44, Ordinance No. 1043. Motion carried 7-0. 15. Heard at the beginning of the meeting. 16. Acted on at the beginning of the meeting. Page 10 July 25, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-42 ORDINANCE NO. 1042 DENIED PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-44, REQUEST OF BURK COLLINS INVESTMENTS TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 13, J.H. BARLOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130, FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO 2F-9-TWO FAMILY DWELLING (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHAPMAN ROAD AND AND APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET WEST OF SMITHFIELD ROAD) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 83-44 ORDINANCE NO. 1043 APPROVED . . . *19. *20. *21. *22. 17. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to grant an appeal hearing on PZ 83-39, to be held on August 22, 1983. Motion carried 7-0. 18. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to reconsider PZ 83-40 at the August 22, 1983, meeting. Motion carried 6-1; Councilmen Kenna, Davis, Fisher, Newman, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Councilman Hubbard voting against. Page 11 July 25, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING AN FOR PZ 83-39 GRANTED POSSIBLE RECONSIDERATION OF PZ 83-40 GRANTED CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION FOR PRETREATMENT OF WASTEWATER ORDINANCE 83-15 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE Ill, TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $46, 117,. 73 - RUFE SNOW DRIVE PHASE II APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE liS, TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $120,972.68 - SNOW HEIGHTS STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE 116, TO STOLARUK CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $186,433.14 - NORTH HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED . . . *23. *24. *2S. *26. ATTEST: 27. There was no one present to present this request. Mr. Line stated that it was possible the requester was not aware this request would be on the agenda. Mr. Line stated he felt it was a worthy cause and funds were available. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he had chaired the meeting when the last request was made and could substantiate the request 100%. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve the allocation of funds to the Woman's Center. Motion carried 7-0. 28. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of July 2S, 1983. Page 12 July 2S, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE liS, TO STOLARUK CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,788.30 - HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR STREET SWEEPING èONTRACT APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WALKER BRANCH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 1119S, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE APPROVED CITIZEN PRESENTATION LYNN SEARCH - WOMAN'S CENTER RE: ALLOCATION OF FUNDS APPROVED ADJOURNMENT Mayor City Secretary . 'CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at tbe North "Richland Hills City Hall Counc11Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7i30 p.m. on August 22. 1983 ~'UMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN Call to Order Roll Call -"~~ Removin~ Item (s) From J _ rnn~ideTation of Consent A~enda Item (s) 1 j Uf 26. 27. 28. 29, 30. 31. & 32 J..... y,') I /1 / i PL~~ING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING 'i)· I RECONSIDERATION-PZ 83-40, Request of t '~~immell, Trustee, to Rezone Tracts ¡ I 12 & 12A, John Barlough Survey, Abstract I , 130 and Tract 2, William Mann Survey~ f " r--- ' Abstract 1010~om Agriculture to 1F-9-15~1 j 1!-8-1400 and IF-8-1300-One Family Dwelling~ . - .. .--.- ~ I f ' · -t- (Located on the South Side of Chapman I e-,'- i Road and Bounded on th~ West by RiChfield!' ¡ Park) I ~ .~~-- Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-40 I ¡ (Ordinance No. 1039) .............-----~ Page 2 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . For the Meeting conducted at the North 'Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. on August 22, 1983 -- NU11B ER ITEM I ACTION TAKEN J .... ./ A" PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - ( Ç) APPEAL HEARING, PZ 83-39, Request of ^ ^ (\.I ~yv - Tierra Financial Incorporated, to Rezone Tract 3A, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, t~o~ Agriculture to 2F-9-Two Family Dwellin ,8 ---.. - (Located on the North Side of Turner Drive - ,...<.- and Approximately 226 feet West of Davis I - I -... ._------- Boulevard) .----- / ~ 1~' Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-39 . (,¡ ..~- ".....~ --,- -,,{/ -- -- PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING ~T I --........-... PZ 83-45, Request of Dr. Jerry D. Mills to .-..-..--.. Rezone a Portion of Tract 3U, T.K. Martin -------1----- ' i ! .----1--- _____1.._ ~ h----+-?-Urv~:y. AbstE2£.t 105~from A riculture to ,. oo__,_~-H'-9-1500-0ne Famil .Dwellin s __...._pocated on the West Side _of Precinct _ --- ì Line RoadancLAp~roximately 1.-200, feec -roo"" - ....-..-_j South 9f _Amunds.QILRpad \ f J. '_-¡_ ---. ~ ¡ - ,------- - ._J.--C 0 n ~ i c1 e r ,q t ; on -'If.-DJ:.d.inaD..C.e-£ar.....E.Z_ H i - ¿ 5 __a_~ i .---...-.--.------+----- .-------- r-- i ¡ ¡ ---r i I ____._,,_ I,' . ----- ,- ---~---- -=---=-- ~~--~. --- Page 3 . ,CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North 'Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on A 11 g11 ~ r ?? 1 q H '1 NUl1B ER ITEM ACTION TAKEN ~. PZ 83-46, Re uest of Ram:} M. Balero. to Rezone Tract 6D, William Cox Survey from A riculture to IF~9-1300-One Famil Located on the West Side of Smithfield Road and A 115 feet North of Noneman .-,-, Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-46 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-47 Re uest of to Rezone Tract 12E~ S. Richardson Survey, A tract 1266 from A riculture to ...__ t 1F:-9-1500-0ne Family Dwellin s Located ----1 on t_he North Side of Rumfield Road and _____ ~i . ::::::~elV 300 feet East of Dªyis ~~~ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 83-47 - .. ~ipJ.ANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING ."_,___+- PZ 83-48, Request of Sabi~e Valley _ I _. ___~._ ¡ Industries to Rezone Tract 3Al, William--¡ ._____1 Mann Sur~ey, Ab~tract 1010, from AgriCU~~ : to IF-8-1200-0ne Family Dwellings J .-. ..- ..._--~.-..-----.---.....-.....-.. - , _..._____-L-(Located on the North Side of Chapman t ~ Road and Approximately 1,130 feet East .~==-J" Rufe Snow Drive)___ I ~-- I --- -- -- --- · Page 4 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on AU2ust 22. 1983 ·CITY OF NORTH'RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - ITEM ACTION TAIŒN ',- ,.I Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 8 -4 ./ ð - {c.:: C{ U (-' \:) / Joint Venture to Rezone a Portion of Tract 3 & Tracts ·4A & 4B Surve Abstract 1 Estates _ Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 8 -4 ,..... PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ ª3-50 Re uest 'of James R. Carter to Re~one a Portion of Lot 1~ B~ock 1\ I Colle e Circle Sho in Center Additio~_ from Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific ~ I Use-Sale of Alcoholic Bevera es I .(Located in the Sho in Cent.er at the ______--t--~outhwest Corner of '.llege 'ircle Drive ---------r- and Davis Boulevard) .~ Consider~tion of Ordinance for PZ 83-50 J ___l t , ~ I -I'"~ I r ~ 1. -CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . Page .5 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers) 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on August 22, 1983 NID-œ ER 23 /) J) ITEM ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Re uest of KEM Advertisin for a Billboard Permit PUBLIC HEARING - REVENUE SHARING BUDGET Presentation of 1983-84 for the Cit of North Richland Hills and Set tin Public Hearin- Date et ~2 Consideration of Pa ment, Estimate iJ 1 ~ --to R&S . . Contractors, Inc., *27. l ! in the Amount 713.75 - Johnson Steel Water Storage Tank, Repair and Repainting I Co~sideration of Partial Pa ent, Estimate #6 to Universal Tank & Iron Works in the Amount of $63,180.00 - Davis Boulevard Elevated Stora e Tank -L ~28. Consideration of Partial Payment Estimate ill~o Stolaruk Corporation in the Amount I __~.l.064.16 - North Hills Street & Drainage __,_I Improvements f i Con~ideration of Change Order #1, in ~~=-t- :::~:t T~f . I. -----1 ----- ~ .--...._~. ¡ -,'" I ---~ _~2g Page 6 . ,CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North 'Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 pþm. on August 22, 1983 Nùl1B ER ITEM ACTION TAKEN ~ onsideration ofChan e Order #2 in the 72.66 - Snow Rei hts e Contract * * ._33_ . -.,.3 I ~- .------ I - - ,--+ , ~-'--- -L ,-,--~___L_ .'--1 PAGE 6 'CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . For the Meeting conducted at the North -Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E~ Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. on August 22, 1983 SUPPLEMENT AGENDA NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *33. Consideration of Resolution on Industrial Development Bonds for Graham Magnetics 34. Citizen Presentation 35. Adjournment - - . . I I I , f =l ~ ._,- .-...-..........-.--. - -..... ------........-.... ~_~--l. -- --- . . e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY,OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 AUGUST 8, 1983 1. ' Mayor Faram called the meeting to order August 8, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim Ramsey Jim Kenna Richard Davis J.C. Hubbard Dick Fisher Harold Newman Marie Hinkle Staff: Dennis Horvath Ginny Pierce Gene Riddle Rex McEntire Richard Albin Lou Spiegel John Whitney Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Assistant City Manager Acting City Secretary Director Public Works/Utility City Attorney City Engineer Finance Director Purchasing Agent Planning & Zoning Member: Marjorie Nash Press: Mark England Absent: Rodger N. Line Jeanette Moore 3. Mid Cities Daily News City Manager City Secretary The invocation was given by Councilman Davis. 4. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of July 25, 1983. Motion carried 7-0. 5. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey removed items #8 and #11 from the Consent Agenda. 6. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. / / '-i CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JULY 25, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING ITEM (8) FROM CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (8) (7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 & 26) · · · *7. 8. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to consider PS 83-61. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Faram opened this item for discussion. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he had several questions regarding the pipeline easement. Why do we want to delete the pipeline easement off of the plat? What was the difficulty in not letting ARCO look at what was going to happen to the property? What was the City's liability in the future if something did happen? Why deviate from the ordinance? The ordinance states it had to be a 25 foot set back. Why not do what the ordinance required? Mr. McEntire stated this was a governmental function and unless the law changed the City would not be liable for approving the plat. Tom Wilder, representing Alan W. Hamm, the developer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Wilder stated that they did not ask for the pipeline easement to be removed. In fact, they had to negotiate the easement itself. He stated that the confusion was from the letter that stated they wanted the volume and page number deleted because it was unavailable at that time that it was enroute from Missouri. Councilman Davis asked if they would have any problem adding the easement to the plat if received. Mr. Wilder said they had no problem putting the easement on the plat but they did not have the volume and page number. Councilman Davis stated that they need to keep item #2 in the Engineer's comments intact. Mr. Wilder said they would be happy to furnish the volume and page number when they received them from Missouri. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked if there was any problem with the Council leaving the Engineer's comments the way they were. Page 2 August 8, 1983 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-60, REQUEST OF MINTEX FOR REPLAT OF LOTS lR, 2, & 3, BLOCK 4, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-61, REQUEST OF ALAN W. HAMM FOR REPLAT OF LOT B-R, BLOCK 11, CLEARVIEW ADDITION APPROVED . . . *10. Mr. Wilder stated that there was a problem with item #6. They did not feel they should have to take their plans to ARCO and have them approved as they had already given permission to asphalt over the easement and, since no building could be put on the easement, they do not feel they should have to take their building plans to the pipeline company. Councilman Kenna asked if ARCO asked to approve the plans. Mr. Wilder stated no. Councilman Kenna asked if ARCO ha4 agreed only for them to put asphalt over their existing 40 foot easement. Mr. Wilder stated yes. Mayor Faram stated that ARCO Pipeline was going to be protected one way or another since anything that would be built there ARCO would have the right to tell them to remove it, and that item #6 was a little bit restrictive in that point. Mr. McEntire stated that they had presently signed an agreement and they would have to get ARCO's approval to build on the easement. Mayor Faram stated that item #6 shouldn't really be a part of this and item #2 could be passed with a contingency that the volume and page number be added before it was presented to the Staff and presented to him for his signature. Councilman Davis stated he felt that item #6 had been taken care of since they did have a written agreement. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to amend the motion to approve PS 83-61, subject to satisfying item #2 on the Engineer's comments. Motion carried 7-0. *9. Page 3 August 8, 1983 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-63, REQUEST OF RAY LOFLAND FOR ~EPLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 9, RICHLAND HILLS WEST ADDITION APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-67, REQUEST OF WAYNE E. WATERS FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 26 THRU 29, BLOCK 15, STONYBROOKE ADDITION APPROVED . . . 11. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to consider PS 83-69. Mayor Faram opened this item for discussion. Councilman Davis asked who was going to maintain the ease- ment of the 30 foot accesô road that went down to 820 since it was dedicated to the City. Mr. Albin said the City would be responsible for the main- tenance. Mr. Riddle stated he understood that the 30 feet belonged to the developer. Councilman Davis stated that he thought that the 30 foot access should be a part of lot 3, and thought that it should be on record that the City would not maintain it. Mr. Gary Kraus, with Graham Assoc., 6737 Brentwood Stair Road, Fort Worth, representing Northwood Plaza Ltd., appeared before the Council. Mr. Kraus stated that it was his understanding that it was not intended to be a public road but an access easement and would be maintained by the owner. Councilman Davis stated that it was not a part of the dedica- tion instrument. That access was not dedicated. The 30 foot strip was bypassed and it could be approved if it would become a part of lot 3. Mr. Kraus stated that it was an easement and did not know if it could become a part of lot 3. Councilman Kenna asked who owned that property. Mr. Kraus stated that he did not know who owned the property. They had an eas~ment across it for the purpose of access and a utility easement. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Kraus if they were under a time pressure to have this approved. Mr. Kraus stated that they were ready to start construction. Page 4 August 8, 1983 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-69, REQUEST OF NORTHWOOD PLAZA LTD. FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 THRU 3, BLOCK 13, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION APPROVED . . . *12. Mayor Faram stated that if the owner could not be identified the City could not accept the dedication as a right-of-way without it being brought up to the City standards, and the City would be locked in. Councilman Kenna said they were not proposing that they wanted to dedicate it to the City. Councilman Davis stated that they were not saying who they wanted to dedicate it to. Mr. Kraus stated it would be an easement to Northwood Plaza Ltd., signed by the owners of the property to the south and he could furnish that information. Councilman Davis asked if there would be aproblem approving the request subject to the Engineers' comments with the stipulation the 30 foot easement be dedicated to lots 1,2, and 3 and shown on the plat who would maintain the 30 foot strip. Mr. Kraus stated he didn't have any problem with that. Mr. McEntire stated it could be done that way. Mayor Faram stated that he would like to have a withdrawal of the motion and second so they could re-word the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey and Councilman Kenna withdrew their original motion. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PS 83-69 subject to the Engineer's comments with the exception of Item #5 and that a documentation of the ease- ment granted to Northwood Plaza Ltd. be shown on the plat and also show who would maintain the 30 foot road easement. Motion carried 7-0. Page 5 August 8, 1983 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-71, REQUEST OF U-TEX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 THRU 3, BLOCK 6, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION APPROVED Page 6 August 8, 1983 . *13. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-72, REQUEST OF U-TEX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION APPROVED *14. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING WATER & SEWER POLICIES ORDINANCE NO. 1045 APPROVED *15. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR CONTRACT FOR CODIFICATION OF ORDINANCES ORDINANCE NO. 1046 APPROVED . *16. CONSIDERATION OF RATIFYING PURCHASE OF LIBRARY SHELVING APPROVED *17. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTIMATE 112, TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $173,564.71 - RUFE SNOW DRIVE PHASE II APPROVED *18. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE 116, TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $209,261.59 - SNOW HEIGHTS STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED . · · · *19. *20. 21. Mr. Horvath stated the proposed use wi¡l be presented at the August 22nd meeting by the Staff baseq on any citizens input between now and the 22nd. Mr. Horvath stated that they had some suggestions from the Staff but the purpose of setting the date of the 22nd was to allow the citizens their input to the management staff. Mayor Faram announced the date for the proposed use hearing would be August 22, 1983. 22. Councilman Newman moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey to appoint Mr. Billy Cypert and Mr. Ron Hubbard as alternates to serve on the Board of Adjustments. Motion carried 7-0. 23. Mr. Horvath stated the proposed billboard sign would be located along Loop 820 on the south side at the rear of Edison's and did meet the requirement of the new sign ordinance. The new sign ordinance requires Council approval for all sign billboards. Mayor Faram asked if in any of the correspondence it indicated what they were going to advertise. Mr. Horvath stated no. Mayor Pro Tem moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to approve this item. Page 7 August 8, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE 115, TO UNIVERSAL TANK & IRON WORKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,544.00 - DAVIS BOULEVARD 2.0 M.G. ELEVATED STORAGE TANK APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR 150' FREE STANDING TOWER APPROVED "PROPOSED USE HEARING" 1983-84 REVENUE SHARING ALLOCATION SET FOR AUGUST 22, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF MAY ADVERTISING FOR A BILLBOARD SIGN APPROVED · · · ~ Mr. J.D. Latham, Vice President of May Advertising Corp. appeared before the Council. Page 8 August 8, 1983 Mr. Latham stated the sign would be located at 7600 N.E. Loop 820 that they had a Northeast National Bank sign on the property now and would be on the west side on the northwest corner of the property. Mr. Latham stated the sign would be a steel bulletin board, double faced, eluminated and would be 14 X 48 size, which was a standard size. Councilman Davis asked what they were going to put on the sign. Mr. Latham stated they did not know, that the Factory Outlet Mall would likely go on the board but it would be a local firm. Motion carried 7-0. 24. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher to deny this request. Councilman Kenna stated he would like to see what was requested in the form of pictures or something. Mr. Richard Drummonds, 3836 Diamond Loch West, North Richland Hills, President of D & F Development Incorporated, appeared before the Council. Mr. Drummonds stated that as the Council could see from the letter that was written that they were requesting a variance from the brick ordinance on the apartments they were building. Mr. Drummonds stated that the variance was just for the ends of the building. Mr. Drummonds presented the Council with pictures and drawings of what they proposed. Mayor Faram asked if Mr. Rice had approved the plans as such even though it was in violation of the ordinance. Mr. Drummonds stated that he complied with 75% on the first floor of the building and the only place the stucco would be was on the end of the building. Mr. Drummonds stated he appreciated the high standards of the City and they were not asking to put up something that would be substandard. Motion to deny failed 4-3, Councilmen Davis, Hubbard and Fisher voting for, Councilwoman Hinkle, Councilmen Kenna, Newman and Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey voting against. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF D AND F DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATION FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE BRICK ORDINANCE APPROVED . . . . Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve granting the variance. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that he wanted to make sure that the 37' by 46' variance would only be on the ends of the buildings, per the memo. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to amend the motion to state that the stucco only be allowed on the ends of the buildings per the drawings that were submitted. Motion to approve the variance carried 4-3; Councilwoman Hinkle, Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey, Councilman Kenna and Newman voting for; Councilman Davis, Hubbard, Fisher voting against. 25. Mr. Mike Brinkley, acting as general counsel for the Industrial Development Corporation, appeared before Council. Mr. Brinkley stated that this resolution was being presented for action to authorize the issuance of five million dollars in revenue refunding bonds. Mr. Brinkley stated that this had been voted on by the Industrial Development Board, however it had to be approved by the Council. Mr. Brinkley stated that Graham Magnetics was Wall Street financed by these bonds that were issued in 1980 in the amount of four and a half million, and that Graham Magnetics was going to do a private placement through Chemical Bank in New York, which he presumed would have a maturity of ten years. Councilman Fisher asked they were proposing to double expending or doubling their operation with the bonds. Mr. Brinkley stated the bonds were refunding bonds and they were paying off the 1980 for private placement. Councilman Kenna stated that the City had no liability for these bonds. Mayor Faram read the following preamble: Resolution 83-16 Resolution approving an agreement from the proposed issuance of $5,000,000 Revenue Refunding Bonds by and between North Richland Hills Industrial Development Corporation and Carlisle Corporation Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Resolution 83-16. Motion carried 7-0. Page 9 August 8, 1983 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ON INDUSTRIAL DEVELOP- MENT BONDS FOR GRAHAM MAGNETICS PROJECT RESOLUTION NO. 83-16 APPROVED '. . . . ~ .. Page 10 August 8, 1983 *26. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 658 - REGULATING AMUSEMENT CENTERS APPROVED 27. None CITIZEN PRESENTATION 28. Mayor Faram recessed the meeting to go into an executive session. RECESS 29. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LAND, LITIGATION AND/OR PERSONNEL The Mayor called the meeting back to order. The same Council Members and Staff were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. BACK TO ORDER 30. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of August 8, 1983. ADJOURNMENT Mayor ATTEST: Ginny Pierce, Acting City Secretary