HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1983-09-12 Agendas
.
-CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820~' at 7:30 p.m. on September 12, 1983
/' ,
~1UMB ER /' ITEM ACTION TAKEN
-~' Call to order
~~ Roll Call
~ Invoc.ation .
,.
k;" Consideration of Minutes of the 'Regular
Meeting August 22, 1983
- -
.
.
--~~ Consideration of Removing Item (s) From
Consent Agenda
-..
~ Consideration of Consent Agenda Item (s)
-
ø ,
----1 (1/7, cÐ(i) 10, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, ¡
./, 25--b 26) j
--~- ¡-;~ANNING- & ZONING - PS 83-80, Request of ....
-þ I Cross__Roads Development Company for I
I Replat of Blocks 7R & 9R, Sno,," Height~i__
i- North Addition {Located on the North side I
! of Lewis Drive~ Bounded on the East bb~ ~
; Holidav West Addition anq the North 1 L
----__L.t1eado"" Crest Drive) __ I
-~~ :- PL~'\t\ING & ZONIKG - p;. 83~83: Request o~-l---
---..1----1Laviº--S..~uerweiIL_L_Çina .L.ott~r for Final ¡
J ..---.--_...._-~-----_ ~
---------l---..!:ill ,of Lot 2. Bock 1 = Coulson Addition 1-----
. . . ---J_-1L9ç:ated on the ì,1eg.2:L~of Crane Road..L._l
.--.,----~--E.a.5..t of Glenann Addit;L~.9_ South of ¡
, I
----J___d."!lu-ùdson R..~____ ___ I
--
'"
\
.age ø
·CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENJA
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers.
7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on September 12, 1983
--
ø
l\U1{B~ . . . .
. ,
/'/ . . ITEM ACTION TAKEN
~ PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-86t Request of
,
c. T. Beckham for Final Plat of Holiday
North Addition, Section 10 (Located on the
East side of Holi.day Lane and Bounded on
the South by TESCO Right of Way)
*10. PL~~ING·& ZONING - PS 83-87, ReQuest of
Steve Simpson Builders, Incorporated for -
Replat of Lots IB-R & IC, Block 9~ Irish :
-- Meadows Addition (Located on the North side
of Emerald Hills Way and West of the
- School)
,
. . . t .,
*11. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-88 Re uest of
Cross Roads Develo for
~e~lat ö£ Block 5 Industrial Park
I Addition (Located at the North,,"e~t Corner
of Rufe Snow Drive and Industrial Park
Boulevard)
t
.~LANNING & ZONING - PS83-89 Re uest of
I '.
____~Mary Darlin£ & G. of I
-.--- I Lot 3Rt Block 1 , ValleY...Eark Estates _ 1.._
I (Located on the East Side of Crane Road ~
¡ and Approximately 176 feet North of Martin r
. I -
--~-ß~ I\oad )J
~;; , ·1 1h;ytµ.&'~
~.l3~ t~(.: Cons.ideration of Ordinance Amendinl! Zonin
~----1. Ordtna~re - ~\1ties o~h~ Boarp~
I Ad ·ustment
--
,
~age 3
·CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
. .
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
.-Irr the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
~301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. on SppremhP~ 1? '9A~
. ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
.~
PZ 8 - 4
. Consideration
for Billboard
----
for Variance from tnp ~ig~ Ordin~n~p
Consideratio
Consideration of Ordinance Amending
~
I Ordinance No. 381, Water and Sewer Policies
j
Water Billin
uent
Bill for First Time
-~20~nsideratiQn of Ordinance JnrrPAsing
I
---.---+ Wa:r;:rant ~~es
i
.-~2l. ! C&.r!ndenHion of Ordinªn~~ Tnc:rp.¡::I!'>ing
.-.-----J-.~...nic;i.pal Court :tines
~
-. -.--~........
j
.~=_..j
i
==J__ -
I
1=
(
¡
i
--
---
----..-----.----.-
. Page 4
. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting..C:-0nducte'd at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
730¡ N.E:~L~op sio, at 7:30 p.m. on September 12, 1983
. /'.. .
/'
~
....
NUMBER
. *22.
ITEM
Consideration of Resolution Opposing
Le islation on Texas Ja1l Standards
ACTION TAKEN
¿23.
Consideratjon of
/16. in the AmotT
partiq~~::~::t;~F.;:~~~tP,~·
· ay NnT~h ~rrppr ~~
~
Consideration of Partial Pa
#7, in the Amount of $50,544.00 to
Universal Tank & Iron Works
Davis Boulevard 2.0 M.G. Elevated·Stora e
Tank-
orated-
*
#3 in the Amount of 350 051.61 to
Consideration of Partial Pa ent Estimate
Austin Road Com anv - Rufe Sno,," Drive
Phase II
onsideration of Partial Pa ment Estimate
i - in. :i,.p. tQe A.ID.ount of $104.587. 78 to
i Au~tin ROpd Company - Sno,," Hei2hts Street
. -----~.d...J)ra:i11age Impro~.ment s
j
t
t
.
=-
I
f
r
I
r
I
I
I
I
t
,
I
I
I
---I
. - - -.------
.
---
~
J
---
, ..
. .
tþage 5
-CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
iJr
For the Meetipg co~ducted at the North Richland Hills C~ty Hall Council ChambeTs,
.Þ ,-, .
~\Ol N~E. LPOþ' ~20~ at 7:30 p.m. on ~ppr~mhpr 1', 1q~1
NUMBER
ITEM
HEARING - Pro osed 1983-84
for the Cit of North
ACTION TAKEN
land Hills
on of Ordinance Ado tin the
~
~rrn~i d
of Ordinance Providin for
f Ad Valorem Tax and
evenue
3?
Ar1jnl1rnmpT1t
I
1__-
;
-----1---
i
-----+ *Fxø,.."ri-\7~ ~pc;~;nn to D:ls..çyss
.. ¡ 1: ~,.,ñ anñ I n-r:. -epr!';nnlJ~ 1
r
--1
~L
P()~
Litigation/
I
r--
J-
~
.
.
.
""
1//
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301,
NORTHEAST LOOP 820, AUGUST 22, 1983. - 7:30 P.M.
1.
Maýo~~Faråm called the meeting to order August 22, 1983 at
7:ðO p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
2.
Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Ramsey
Jim Kenna
Richard Davis
°J.C. Hubbard
Dick Fisher
Harold Newman
Marie Hinkle
Staff:
Rodger Line
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
Dennis Horvath
Richard Albin
Lou Spiegel
Planning & Zoning:
Marjorie Nash
Don Bowen
Press:
Mark England
3.
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
ROLL CALL
City Manager
City Secretary
City Attorríey
Assistant City Manager
City Engineer
Finance Director
Mid Cities
The invocation was given by Councilman Davis.
INVOCATION
4.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve the minutes of the August 8, 1983 meeting.
Motion carried 7-0.
5.
None.
6.
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 8, 1983
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
REMOVING ITEMS (8)
FROM CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve the consent agenda.
Motion carried 7-0."
CONSIDERATION OF
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEMS (S) (#26, 27,
28, 29, 30, 31, & 32)
APPROVED
.
.
.
..,.
7.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Councilman Davis asked to be excused from the Council table
due ·to a póssible conflict, because he had done the survey-
ing on the proper~y.
Mayor Far~ excused Councilman Davis.
ø . t. .
M~ Frank·Kimmell, 1330 Plaza Drive, Granbury, Texas,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Kimmell stated he had initially applied for IF-8-1400,
IF-9-1500 and IF-8-1200 and the Planning and Zoning Commission
had approved but changed the square footage to 1300, 1400 and
1500. Mr. Kimmell stated that when the request went to the
Coun,cil the entire proj ect was approved 1500. Mr. Kimmell
stated that in that meeting Councilman Hubbard made the
st,atement that it was his goal that all new projects in the
City be 1500 square feet. Mr. Kimmell stated that if his
project was in an unzoned area he would have no problem with
the 1500 square feet. Mr. Kimmell stated his project was in
an area that was substantially all zoned, an~ a considerable
portion already built. Mr. Kimmell stated the property adjoin-
ing his tract to the east was zoned for duplexes, on the
southeast industrial, south and southwest IF-7 and had been
built IF-7. Mr. Kimmell stated he was requesting the Council
to change the building minimums on the portion of his property
that was 1F-8 from 1500 and 1400 lea~ing the 1F-9 at 1500.
Mr. Kimmell stated he felt it would be comfortable to the
existing zoning in the area.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Kimmell if he would accept the 1500
square footage requirement.
Mr. Kimmell stated that if he had to he would, but did not feel
that was what was needed in that particular area.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that since the last meeting he and
Mr. Kimmell had some discussion and he had expressed to him
that if he had to go to IF-9-1500 he would prefer the tract go
back to agriculture.
Mr. Kimmell stated that was when the whole tract was being
discussed, it was his understanding the property was already
zoned IF-8 and IF-9 on the 26 lots adjoining Chapman Road on
the north and the balance of the property zoned IF-B.
Councilman Kenna asked what the property was zoned at the
present time.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated that according to the minutes of
the last meeting the motion was IF-8-I500 and IF-9-1S00.
August 22, 1983
Page 2
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
RECONSIDERATION
PZ 83-40, REQUEST OF
FRANK KIMMELL,
TRUSTEE, TO REZONE
TRACTS 12 & 12A,
JOHN BARLOUGH SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 130 AND
TRACT 2, WILL lAM MANN
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1010
FROM AGRICULTURE TO
1F-9-1500, 1F-8-1400
& 1F-8-1200 - ONE
FAMILY DWELLINGS
(LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF CHAPMAN
ROAD AND BOUNDED ON
THE WEST BY RICHFIELD
PARK)
.
.
.
~
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposiOtion
to this request tq please come forward.
Mr_ D¥n Patterson, 6445 Sudbury Way, appeared before the
Coynéil:
Mr. Patterson stated he was glad the Council saw fit to raise
the square footage. Mr. Patterson 'stated his concern was
pedestrian access to Richfield Park. Mr. Patterson stated he
hoped this Council did not make the same mistake as their
predecessor's did. When North Park Estates I was developed
there were 35 homes built with the backyards next to the park
and the rest of the homes did not have ready access to the
park.
Mayor Faram stated the park was a gift to the City and did
not know how the City could make the requirements. Mayor
Faram advised Mr. Patterson the matter of access could be
discussed when the platting came up.
Mr. Patterson asked how he could pursue the matter.
Mayor Faram advised Mr. Patterson he would be notified when
the plat came up for approval.
Councilman Fisher asked if there was not a street that dead-
ended into the park.
Mr. Patterson stated no.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed
the public hearing.
8.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna to
approve PZ 83-40, Ordinance No. 1039, with the stipulation
IF-8-1500 and 1F-9-1500.
Motion carried 6-0.
Councilman Davis returned to the Council table.
August 22, 1983
Page 3
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 83-40
ORDINANCE NO. 1039
APPROVED
.
.
.
9. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, appeared before
the Council representing Tierra Financial.
Mr. Stembridge stated the request was to rezone approximately
13 acres from agriculture to IF-9. Mr. Stembridge stated his
client felt this would be an ideal location for duplexes.
ø ,t. .
..,.
Co~ncilwoman 'Hinkle asked how many duplexes they planned to
build.
Mr. Stembridge stated thirty-five.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this-request to please come forward.
Mr. J.G. Haley, 8116 Turner, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Haley stated he represented a neighborhood committee and
they still had the same objections they had in December and
February when the request went before the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Mr. Haley stated the problems t~at had been
brought up were drainage, sewerage, water and traffic and the
problems had not been resolved at this time.
Councilman Kenna asked the nature of the water problems.
Mr. Haley stated distribution.
Councilman Kenna asked if there were small lines_.in the area.
Mr. Albin stated there was a distribution problem. There was
a 6" line in Turner~ a 2" line in Davis and a 24" line in
Hightower.
Councilman Fisher asked Mr. Haley if he felt the intersection
of Turner and Davis was dangerous.
Mr. Haley stated it was a very dangerous intersection.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mr. Haley if he was aware that a
lot of monies had been spent in that neighborhood and some of
the problems were relieved. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated the
Council did recognize the problems and the Engineer was
working on plans for the area.
Councilman Davis stated that he could understand the water,
sewer and traffic problems and the City was trying to correct
the problems as much as possible. Councilman Davis stated he
did not feel these problems were applicable to the zoning
case. They were strictly platting problems. Councilman
Davis stated the Council's objective tonight was to determine
the best use of the land.
August 22~ 1983
Page 4
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL HEARING
PZ 83-39, REQUEST OF
TIERRA FINANCIAL
INCORPORATED, TO
REZONE TRACT 3At
WILLIAM COX SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 321, FROM
AGRICULTURE TO 2F-9-
TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF TURNER DRIVE
AND APPROXIMATELY
226 FEET WEST OF
DAVIS BOULEVARD)
.
.
.
~
Mr. John Larriviere, 6971 Cox Lane, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Larriviere stated his objection was the drainage and
traffic congestion. Mr. Larriviere stated Turner was a very
narrow street.
Councilwom~n Hinkle asked if there were plans to widen
Turnet. .
/'
Mr. Albin stated there were no plans at this time. Turner was
not on the Thoroughfare Master Plan.
Councilman Davis asked if the applicant owned thirteen acres
or twenty-five.
Mr. Stembridge stated the applicant only owned thirteen
acres.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed
the public hearing.
10.
Councilman Hubbard stated that the applicant had reduced the
dwellings from 250 tq approximately 78 and the population
from 1,000 to approximately 250. Councilman Hubbard stated
he felt this was a step down and he thought this would be
the best use of the property.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to
approve PZ 83-39, 'Ordinance No. 1048:
Councilman Davis stated the questions that had arisen on the
water, sewer and streets, hopefully the Council had
addressed the problems but these were all platting problems
that would have to be addressed and taken care of, even to
the effect of the widening of Turner Road, or his portion of
Turner Road. Councilman Davis stated that on the drainage,
in platting the property th~ applicant did have to have
underground drainage. Councilman Davis stated the applicant
had reduced the request and he felt that if the request was
approved it would bring in some of the needed improvements in
the area.
Councilman Kenna stated he felt the best use of the land
would be single family. Councilman Kenna stated he did agree
with Councilman Davis on the platting, but there was nothing
platting could do on the congested intersection.
Councilman Hubbard stated that the applicant had reduced the
dwellings from 250 to approximately 78 and the population
from 1,000 to approximately 250. Councilman Hubbard stated
he felt this was a step down and he thought this would be the
best use of the property.
August 22, 1983
Page 5
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 83-39
ORDINANCE NO. 1048
Drnrrn
.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to
approve PZ 83-39, Ordinance No. 1048.
Mayor Faram advised the Council this was an appeal hearing
and would require'3/4 vote of the Council for approval.
Mo£iQR failed by a vote of 5-2; Councilmen Kenna, Fisher,
~ Ne~an,~Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey and Councilwoman Hinkle voting
against; Councilman Hubbard and Davis voting for.
.
.
11.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Stembridge stated that Dr. Mills would like to build a
home on this property and in order to get a permit he had to
rezone the property.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the
public hearing.
12.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve PZ 83-45, Ordinance No. 1049.
Motion carried 7-0.
13.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Stembridge stated that Mr. BaIera would like to build a
home.
Councilman Davis stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission
had recommended the request be changed to 1F-9-1S00 and asked
Mr. Stembridge if his client would agree to 1500.
Mr. Stembridge stated yes.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
August 22, 1983
Page 6
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 83-45, REQUEST OF
DR. JERRY D. MILLS TO
REZONE A PORTION
OF TRACT 3U,
T.K. MARTIN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1055, FROM
AGRICULTURE TO 1F-9-
1500 ONE FAMILY
DWELLING (LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF
PRECINCT LINE ROAD
AND APPROXIMATELY
1,200 FEET SOUTH OF
AMUNDSON ROAD)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 83-45
ORDINANCE NO. 1049
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 83-46, REQUEST OF
RAMIRO M. BALERSO TO
REZONE TRACT 6D,
WILLIAM COX SURVEY
FROM AGRICULTURE TO
IF-9-1300 ONE FAMILY
DWELLING (LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF
SMITHFIELD ROAD AND
APPROXIMATELY 115
FEET NORTH OF NONEMAN
S~REET)
.
. 16.
.
.... 15 .'
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
14. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve PZ-S3-46, Ordinance No. 1050, with the stipulation
IF-9-1500.
Motion ca~~ied 7-0.
.
, .
Maýor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Delbert Stembridge stated he represented the owner and
asked that the Council approve the request.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to the request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed
the public hearing.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve PZ 83-47,. Ordinance No. 1051.
Motion carried 7-0.
17.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Tim Fleet, Representative, Sabine Valley, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Fleet stated they planned to develop 158 lots and did not
plan on selling any of the lots to other developers.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey advised Mr. Fleet his recommendation
would be 1F~9-1500.
Mr. Fleet stated they had asked for the lesser zoning because
they would not make as much profit on the larger zoning.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Fleet if he was aware that the
IF-9-1500 would be larger houses and lots.
Mr. Fleet stated yes.
Mr. Fleet stated the larger zoning would put them at a
disadvantage.
August 22, 1983
Page 7
CONSIDERATION OF
ORD INANCE FOR
PZ 83-46
ORDINANCE NO. 1050
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 83-47, REQUEST OF
SAMMYE THOMPSON TO
REZONE TRACT 12E,
s. RICHARDSON SURVEY~
ABSTRACT 1266, FROM
AGRICULTURE TO 1F-9-
1500 ONE FAMILY
DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF
RUMFIELD ROAD AND
APPROXIMATELY 300
FEET EAST OF DAVIS
BOULEVARD)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 83-47
ORDINANCE NO. 1051
APP,ROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 83-48, REQUEST OF
SABINE VALLEY INDUS-
TRIES TO REZONE
TRACT 3Al, WILLIAM
MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT
1010, FROM AGRICUL-
TURE TO IF-8-1200 ONE
FAMILY DWELLINGS
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF CHAPMAN ROAD
AND APPROXIMATELY
1,130 FEET EAST OF
RUFE SNOW DRIVE)
.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to please forward.
The~e being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the
public hearing.
18.
Mayor Pro. rem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
toÞaRprové'PZ 83-48, Ordinance No. 1052, with the stipulation
of/'lF-8-1500.
~
Motion carried 7-0.
19.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forwardL
Mr. Mark Tutun, representative of Baker and Associates,
appeared before the Council.
.
Mr. Tutun stated that they had this property currently under
contract. Mr. Tutun stated their business was to buy land,
plan it, rezone it when necessary and develop it, then sell
the lots to builders. Mr. Tutun stated this property would
have roughly 300 lots so that would probably be two builders.
Mr. Tutun stated the land adjacent was Foster Village and
they were trying to pickup where it left off.
Mr. Tutun stated they would put in all the necessary improve-
ments.
Councilman Hubbard asked if the Council granted IF-8-1500
could they live with it.
Mr. Tutun stated they could accept the IF-8-1500 as opposed
to dropping the whole project.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to
the request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed
the public hearing.
20. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve PZ 83-48, Ordinance No. 1053, with the stipulation
of IF-B-1500.
Motion carried 7-0.
.
Mayor Faram called a fifteen minute recess.
Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same
Council Members and Staff were present as recorded at the
beginning of the meeting.
August 22, 1983
Page 8
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 83-48
ORDINANCE NO. 1052
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 83-49, REQUEST OF
BAKER AND ASSOCIATES
JOINT VENTURE TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 3 & TRACTS 4A
& 4B, THOMAS SPRONCE
SURVEY ABSTRACT 1399
& NORTH RICHLAND
ESTATES FROM 1F-9-'
1500 ONE FAMILY
DWELLINGS TO IF-8-
1400 ONE FAMILY
DWELLINGS TO IF-8-
1400 ONE FAMILY
DWELLINGS (LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF RUFE
SNOW DRIVE, BOUNDED ON
THE EAST BY DOUGLAS
LANE AND APPROXIMATELY
906 FEET SOUTH OF
BURSEY ROAD)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 83-49
ORDINANCE NO. 1053
APPROVED
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
. 21.
.
.
..,.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. James Carter appeared before the Council.
Mr. Carte~~stated he was requesting the rezoning change
so·h~~coula sell alcoholic beverages.
/'
Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Carter if he was aware the
permi t would be issued in his name.,
Mr. Carter replied yes.
Councilman Newman asked if this would be the first one in
area.
Mr. Carter replied no.
Councilman Davis asked if this was a restaurant.
Mr. Carter replied it was a Pizza Parlor.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to the request to please come forward.
Mr. Jessee Holmes, 5729 Carolyn Drive, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Hol~es stated he objected because of the locality of the
neighborhood. Mr. Holmes stated that College Circle was the
only entrance into this addition and the only place the
street went was to the Fort Worth Christian School. Mr.
Holmes stated he also objected to the parking and the traffic
it would create in the neighborhood.
Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Holmes if he was aware that the
State Laws were very specific on issuing permits for beer and
wine in a restaurant and as a Council they did not have the
authority to deny the permit and if it were denied the City
could be overruled in the County Court at a cost to the City.
Mr. Holmes stated in that case, he saw no reason for having a
hearing if nothing could be done.
Councilman Hubbard stated he was not saying nothing could be
done, but there had been cases where the Council had denied
the request and the Court overruled the City.
Mr. Ray Bullard, 7500 College Circle South, appeared before
the Council.
August 22, 1983
Page 9
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 83-50, REQUEST OF
JAMES R. CARTER TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
LOT 1, BLOCK 1,
COLLEGE CIRCLE
SHOPPING CENTER
ADDITION FROM LOCAL
RETAIL TO LOCAL
RETAIL-SPECIFIC-USE
SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES (LOCATED
IN THE SHOPPING
CENTER AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
COLLEGE CIRCLE DRIVE
AND DAVIS BOULEVARD)
.
Mr. Bullard stated he objected to the request because of the
drinking at the location. Mr. Bullard stated he wanted to
keep alcohol out of the area.
Mrse_ Margaret Brown, 7500 Lincolnshire, appeared before the
Council.
Mrs. Brown stated she did not want to see this in the area
and. 9-1so there would be beer cans thrown eve-rywhere.
~ /' .
Councilman Davis asked Mrs. Brown if she was aware the
alcoholic beverages could not be taken out of the establish-
men t .
Mr. Brown stated the people would not stay there.
-
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed
the public hearing.
22.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Newman,
to approve PZ 83-50, Ordinance No. 1054, the permit to be
in the name of James Carter and non-transferable.
.
Councilman Hubbard stated he could agree wit~ the opposition,
but the City had lost in Court in the past and the establish-
ment would have to sell 60% food to 40% alcohol.
Councilman Davis asked if there was a convenience store
across the street that sold alcoholic beverages.
Councilman Fisher replied yes.
Motion carried 7-0
23. Councilman Kenna stated this application did meet the
requirements of the Sign Ordinance, however, the property
currently was not platted.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey,
to approve this request subject to the property being platted
and any pro rata that would be due.
Councilman Davis stated there was another large sign on the
property and his concern was that there were apartments
directly north and the sign would be lighted.
Mr. Line stated there might be a difference of opinion on
whether the sign met the requirements. Mr. Line stated it
was his understanding that the tract of land already had its
quota of signs.
.
Councilman Davis stated he agreed with the Staff and
recommended the application be denied.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey amended the motion, seconded by
Councilman Kenna, to postpone until more data was received.
August 22, 1983
Page 10
CONSIDERATION OF
ORD INANCE FOR
PZ 83-50
ORDINANCE NO. 1054
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF KEM
ADVERTISING FOR A
BILLBOARD PERMIT
POSTPONED
.
Councilman Davis stated he saw no reason to postpone if it
did not meet the requirements of the Sign Ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey called for the question. Councilman
Kenna seconded.
~
Motion carried 6-1; Councilmen Kenna, Fisher, Davis, Newman,
Mayor Pro ~em Ramsey and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for;
Councilma~~Hubbard against.
Mo~i¿n on:the amendment carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey,
Councilmen Hubbard, Kenna, Newman, Fisher and Councilwoman
Hinkle voting for; Councilman Davis voting against.
24. Mr. Line advised this was the second hearing, as required
by law. Mr. Line presented the following proposed Reyenue
Sharing Budget:
Library Automation
Civil Defense Siren
Public Safety Computer
Fire Station/Remodeling
$ 32,800
29,400
75,000
75,000
TOTAL
$212,200
.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the
public hearing.
Mayor F~ram stated that it had been brought to his attention
that a Boy Scout was present and asked the gentl~man to come
forward.
Andrew Martinez came forward. Master Martinez advised he was
working toward his Communication Eagle Merit Badge and only
needed three more merits before receiving it.
.
25. Mr. Line advised this was a balanced budget, the total amount
of the proposed budget was $14,644,989. Mr. Line stated this
was an approximate 8.6% increase over the current budget.
Mr. Line stated there were service improvements proposed in
the budget to meet the most critical demands and require-
ments of the City at the present time. Primarily in the area
of strengthening the street maintenance program, Library
services, establishing a formalized park and recreation
maintenance operating program, public safety improvements,
additional policemen and improvements in the financial
management area. Mr. Line stated that the City of North
Richland Hills was in a very strong financial position due to
the growth, strength of the local economy and the sound
conservative political leadership. Mr. Line stated that the
original proposal of the City Manager called for a $0.01 tax
rate reduction from $0.57 to $0.56. However, since that time
August 22, 1983
Page 11
PUBLIC HEARING
REVENUE SHARING
BUDGET
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
PRESENTATION OF
1983-84 OPERATING
BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS AND
SETTING PUBLIC
HEARING DATE
.
.
.
~
*26.
the City had welcome news, having done an audit pursuant to
the Mayor's directive, on the sales tax collections. We
learned the City was entitled to and have already received,
$630,000 that should have gone to ,North Richland Hills that
was received by Fort Worth, Hurst, Richland Hills and Euless.
Mr. Line stated those funds enabled the City to strengthen
the Capitai Improvements Program in lieu of doing it out of
next year's budge~, plus the fact next years sales tax
revenue estimate is increased by approximately $170,000 to
$1~5,900 s~nce those taxes that have been going to other
cities will, in the future be going to North Richland Hills.
Mr~ Liné s'tated that the Staff recommended an additional tax
rate reduction of $0.07 which would be $0.50 per $100.00
valuation.
Mayor Faram stated that he felt it was important to note that
the City Council had put before the public an opportunity to
vote on-a Capital Improvements Program, which they authoriz-
ed, in the selling of eight million dollars in bonds. Mayor
Faram stated the primary purpose was, or the number one
priority was to improve Rufe Snow Drive and designate it as a
major thoroughfare and when completed it would attract
commercial enterprises to help share the tax burden and felt
that had come to pass. Mayor Faram stated it was pretty hard
to run a city on strictly ad valorem tax. ~or Faram stated
a commitment had been made by the City not to raise that
portion of the taxes above the $0.22 and that will be in Mr.
Line's recommendation for the retirement of the debt service
so that left $0.28 for the maintenance and operating budget.
Mayor Faram stated he was very pleas~d with the Staff on
preparing a very good budget and with the Council for working
so hard on their input. Mayor Faram stated he felt it was a
very good budget.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
set the public hearing on the 1983-84 Operating Budget for
September 12, 1983.
Motion carried 7-0.
August 22, 1983
Page 12
CONSIDERATION OF
PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #1,
TO R&S QUALITY
PAINTING CONTRACTORS,
INC., IN THE AMOUNT
OF $23,713.75 -
JOHNSON STEEL WATER
STORAGE TANK, REPAIR
AND REPAINTING
APPROVED
August 22, 1983
. ~ Page 13
*27. CONSIDERATION OF
. PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE 116, TO
UNIVERSAL TANK & IRON
WORKS IN THE AMOUNT
OF $63,180.00 - DAVIS
BOULEVARD ELEVATED
STORAGE TANK
*28. " CONSIDERATION OF
.,. / PARTIAL PAYMENT
ESTIMATE 117, TO
STOLARUK CORPORATION
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$7,064.16 - NORTH
HILLS STREET &
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*29. CONSIDERATION OF
CHANGE ORDER Ill, IN
THE AMOUNT OF
$8,428.75 - RUFE SNOW
DRIVE PHASE II
APPROVED
. *30. CONSIDERATION OF
CHANGE ORDER 112, IN
THE AMOUNT OF
$147,972.66 - SNOW
HEIGHTS STREET &
DRAINAGE CONTRACT
APPROVED
*31. CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
DEPOSITORY BANK
APPROVED
*32. CONSIDERATION OF
BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
APPROVED
33. None CITIZEN PRESENTATION
34. Mayor Faram adjourned the August 22, 1983 meeting. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor
. ATTEST:
City Secretary
.
.
.
~
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, .7301
NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 12, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
Mayor Faram called the meeting to order September 12, 1983, at
7:30 p.m.
2.
Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Ramsey
Jim Kenna
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
. Harold Newman
J.C. Hubbard
Marie Hinkle
Staff:
Rodger Line
Jeanette Moore
Dennis Horvath
Rex McEntire
Richard Albin
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
City Manager
City Secretary
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
City Engineer
Planning & Zoning Members:
Marjorie Nash
Don Bowen
George Tucker
Press:
Mark England
Dan Reed
3.
Mid Cities
Star Telegram
The invocation was given by Councilman Hubbard.
4.
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey,
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting August 22, 1983.
Motion carried 7-0.
5.
Councilman Davis removed items #8 & 9.
6.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve the consent agenda.
Motion carried 7-0..
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 22, 1983
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
REMOVING ITEMS FROM
CONSENT AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM ( S ) 117, 1 0 ,
11, 12, 20, 21, 22,
23, 24, 25 & 26
APPROVED
.
.
.
ci'
*7.
8. Councilman Davis asked to be excused from the Council table
because of a possible conflict.
Mayor Faram excused Councilman Davis.'
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey,
to approve PS 83-83.
Motion carried 6-0.
Councilman Davis returned to the Council table.
9.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey,
to approve PS 83-36.
Councilman Davis stated that the Planning and Zoning
Commission had approved this request with some stipulations.
Councilman Davis stated that one of the stipulations was that
a notation be made on the plat that no building permit would
be issued on Lot 2 until such time paved access was provided
for Lot 2 Block 35 from Todd Drive. Councilman Davis asked
the City Attorney if the notation on the plat would be adequate.
Mr. McEntire stated yes.
Mayor Faram stated he would like to refer the letters of
comment where the applicant took exception to paying pro
rata for three sewer lines, if they were not going to use
them. Mayor Faram asked if and when the applicant tapped on
to the lines would they have to pay the pro rata.
Mr. Line stated yes, on the lines they tapped on to.
September \12, 1983
Page 2
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 83-30, REQUEST OF
CROSS ROADS
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
FOR REPLAT OF BLOCKS
7R & 9R, SNOW HEIGHTS
NORTH ADDITION
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF LEWIS DRIVE
BOUNDED ON THE EAST
BY HOLIDAY WEST
ADDITION AND THE
NORTH BY MEADOW CREST
DRIVE)
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 83-83, REQUEST OF
DAVID SAUERWEIN &
GINA POTTER FOR FINAL
PLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK
1, COULSON ADDITION
(LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF CRANE ROAD,
EAST OF GLENANN
ADDITION AND SOUTH
OF AMUNDSON ROAD)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 83-86, REQUEST
OF C.T. BECKHAM FOR
FINAL PLAT OF HOLIDAY
NORTH ADDITION,
SECTION 10, (LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE OF
HOLIDAY LANE AND
BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH
BY TESCO RIGHT-OF-
WAY)
APPROVED
.
.
.
*10.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to
amend the motion to state "approved PS 83-86 subject to. the
Engineers' .comments, except pro rata not be paid on the
sewer unless the applicant taps on to the line and no
building permit be issued on Lot 2, Block 35, until paved
access was available from Circle Drive and Todd Drive".
Councilman Kenna asked why the City would be concerned on
access to the lot if a bridge was built that should be
adequate. The applicant only owned the part where a bridge
could be built. He did not own the other part.
Councilman Davis stated one, concern was fire protection.
There was no dedication for a fire lane. The bridge would
have to be big enough for emergency vehicles.
Councilman Kenna stated that before any permits could be
issued on that lot, access would have to be available that
would permit emergency vehicles.
Mayor Faram asked if there were safeguards to see that
before anything was built on the lot that emergency vehicles
would be able to get to it.
Mr. Line stated a permit would not be issued if the lot
could not be reached by emergency vehicles.
Councilman Davis withdrew the portion of the motion that
stated ùntil paved access was available from Circle Drive
and Todd Drive; Councilman Hubbard withdrew his second.
Amended motion carried 7-0.
Original motion as amended carried. 7-0.
September 12, 1983
Page 3
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 83-37, REQUEST OF
STEVEN SIMPSON
BUILDERS,
INCORPORATED FOR
REPLAT OF LOTS IB-R &
IC, BLOCK 9, IRISH
MEADOWS ADDITION
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF EMERALD HILLS
WAY AND vlEST OF THE
SCHOOL)
APPROVED
.
.
.
*11.
*12.
13. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna,
to postpone Ordinance No. 1055.
Motion carried 7-0.
14. Mr. McEntire advised the Council the following changes had
been made:
"Section A. The total funds required to build the left turn
bridge (described in the application) will be furnished by
the applicant. Tne plan for the bridge must be accepted and
approved by the Texas Department of Highways and the estimated
cost of construction (as established by such Department) must
be placed in escrow with the City before any building permit is
issued for multi-family housing"
"Section H. The plan presented to the City Council marked
Exhibit fiG", attached hereto and made a part hereof."
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to approve
ratification of Ordinance No. 1033 with the changes presented by
the City Attorney.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that the night of the public hearing
on Ordinance No. 1033 he had voted against the Ordinance and felt
that in due respect he would vote against it tonight.
September 12, 1983
Page 4
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 83-88, REQUEST OF
CROSS ROADS
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
FOR REPLAT OF BLOCK
5, INDUSTRIAL PARK
(LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF
RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND
INDUSTRIAL PARK
BOULEVARD)
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 83-89, REQUEST OF
MARY DARLING & G.C.
FREEBY FOR REPLAT OF
LOT 3R, BLOCK 1,
VALLEY PARK ESTATES
(LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF CRANE ROAD
AND APPROXIMATELY 176
FEET NORTH OF MARTIN
ROAD)
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE AMENDING
ZONING ORDINANCE -
DUTIES OF THE BOARD
OF ADJUSTMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 1055
POSTPONED
CONSIDERATION OF
RATIFICATION OF
ORDINANCE NO. 1033,
MEADOW LAKES ZONING
CASE DATED JUNE 13,
1983
APPROVED
.
.
.
Motion carried 6-1; Councilman Kenna, Newman, Davis, Hubbard,
Fisher and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Mayor Pro Tem
Ramsey voting against.
15. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to grant an appeal hearing for PZ 83-54 to be held October 10,
1983.
Motion carried 7-0.
16. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to
deny this request.
Motion carried 6-1; Councilmen Davis, Fisher, Hubbard, Newman,
and Pro Tem Ramsey and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for;
Councilman Kenna voting against.
17. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to deny this request.
Motion carried 5-2; Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey and Councilmen
Fisher, Hubbard, Davis and Newman voting for; Councilman
Kenna and Councilwoman Hinkle voting against.
18. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve the contract for architectural services with
Komatsu and Associates in the amount of $12,000.
Councilman Hubbard asked if the City put this contract out
for bids.
Mr. Line stated this was considered a professional service
and the suppliers of architectural services did not bid.
Mr. Line stated the City did solicit and obtain seven or
eight proposals for doing the work, that did not submit a
bid price. Mr. Line stated nine submitted statements of
qualifications of which eight responded. Mr. Line stated
a Staff Committee made of the Public Works Director, Police
Chief, Assistant City Manager and himself ranked them as
objectively as they knew how and the proposal of Komatsu
and Associates ranked far and above the other firms.
Councilman Hubbard asked if there were engineering firms
in the City that had architectural consultants.
Mr. Line stated yes, there were two or three that have
offices in the City. Their proposals were not considered
as substantial as Komatsu.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked if Komatsu was the architect
on the present facility.
Mr. Line stated yes.
September 12, 1983
Page 5
CONSIDERATION OF
GRANTING AN APPEAL
HEARING FOR PZ 83-54
GRANTED
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF KEM
ADVERTISING FOR
BILLBOARD PERMIT
(POSTPONED AT THE
AUGUST 22, 1983
MEETING)
DENIED
CONSIDERATION OF
REQUEST OF MOBIL
OIL FOR VARIANCE
FROM THE SIGN
ORDINANCE
DENIED
CONSIDERATION OF
CONTRACT FOR
ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES - KOMATSU
& ASSOCIATES
APPROVED
.
*20.
*21.
. *22.
*23.
*24.
.
Motion carried 7-0.
19. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to
postpone Ordinance No. 1056.
Motion carried 7-0.
September 12, 1983
Page 6
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 381
WATER AND SEWER
POLICIES WATER
BILLING POLICY
CHANGE-DELINQUENT
BILL FOR FIRST TIME
ORDINANCE NO. 1056
POSTPONED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE INCREASING
WARRANT FEES
ORDINANCE NO. 1057
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE INCREASING
MUNICIPAL COURT
FINES
ORDINANCE NO. 1058
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION OPPOSING
LEGISLATION ON TEXAS
JAIL STANDARDS
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE #6, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $33,897.33
TO STOLARUK-HOLIDAY
NORTH STREET AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE #7, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $50,544.00
TO UNIVERSAL TANK &
IRON WORKS,
INCORPORATED - DAVIS
BOULEVARD 2.0 M.G.
ELEVATED STORAGE TANK
APPROVED
.
.
.
*25.
*26.
27. Mr. Line stated the staff was pleased to present a budget
year that called for a reduction in the tax rate from $0.57
in the current year to $0.50 in the ensuing year, yet
maintain a very strong financial position and upgrading
City services where they were considered most deficient.
Mr. Line stated that Public Safety, Financial Administration,
Library and several other areas would be upgraded.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak to please come forward.
Mrs. Connie Skinner, 4601 Lariat Trail, appeared before the
Council.
Mrs. Skinner asked if item #18 on the agenda, the $27,000 for
the architectural services was part of the budget and what
public buildings were going to be studied.
Mr. Line stated that at the time the budget was prepared it
was anticipated that the architectural services cost would
be as much as $27,000. However the cost would only be $12,000.
Mrs. Skinner asked if the present building was going to be
studied.
Mr. Line stated a portion of the building would be, the north
end of the building where the Police Department was presently
badly overcrowded. Mr. Line stated that opposed to studying
the building the architect would study the space needed.
Mr. Line stated that in addition a public works center, water,
sewer and streets, as well as an animal shelter, would be
studied.
Mrs. Skinner stated that $45,000 for a message board as opposed
to $15,000 for the community center was a little out of line.
September 12, 1983
Page 7
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE #3, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $350,051.61
TO AUSTIN ROAD
COMPANY - RUFE SNOW
DRIVE, PHASE II
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE #7, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $104,587.78
TO AUSTIN ROAD
COMPANY - SNOW
HEIGHTS STREET AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
PUBLIC HEARING
PROPOSED 1983-84
OPERATING BUDGET FOR
THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS
.
Mayor Faram stated that the message board would be funded from
the Hotel/Motel tax and expenditure of those funds had certain
limitations, and that was for the promotion of the City.
Councilman Kenna stated that provisions have been made for some
of the funds from the hotel/motel tax and that hopeful~y in the
future would provide a better community center.
Mayor Faram closed the public hearing.
28. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve Ordinance No. 1059.
.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that during the budget process,
and since that time, he had concerns about it. Mayor Pro Tem
Ramsey stated that the 1983'General Fund Budget was 5.7
million. and in 1984 it was 6.7s which indicated a 16% increase.
Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated the Utility Fund was up 11% and
the tax base was only projected to be 6%. Mayor Pro Tem
Ramsey stated he would hate to see the City get in a posture
to where the expenditures got ahead of the increase in the
tax base. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he disagreed with
seventeen added personnel and disagreed with nineteen
take-home vehicles and he felt it was far in excess for a
City this size. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he believed the
City Manager put together a budget that he felt comfortable
with and presented it to the Council and it was their job to
look at it, and take action. Mayor Pro Tern stated it was
the Council that had to answer to the citizens on how the
City was spending their tax dollars. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey
stated that he felt that if not for his and the Mayor's
efforts there would not be a 12% tax reduction and if not
for that reduction, in all good conscience he would have to
vote against the budget. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated that
by granting this bodacious increase, he would hope by this
time next year the services would be provided to the
community.
Councilman Davis stated the Council had worked since July on
the budget and there had been some increased expenditures,
but the City was growing. Councilman Davis stated the City
was able to broaden the tax base without making it a burden
on the citizens. Councilman Davis stated he did support the
budget and this was one of the few cities having a tax
reduction.
.
Councilman Kenna stated that he could not disagree with any
of the comments. However, when he came on the Council 3~
years ago there had been some very lean years as far as
expenditures. Councilman Kenna stated the roads were in bad
repair and we had not moved on major construction projects
as we should have. Councilman Kenna stated he expected the
increase would allow the City to keep going this year and
keep up with its needs.
September 12, 1983
Page 8
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE ADOPTING
THE 1983-83 OPERATING
BUDGET
ORDINANCE NO. 1059
APPROVED
" . .
-
.
.
.
Mayor Faram stated he appreciated the interest of the
Council who had worked several sessions on the budget on how
the budget should be done and the expenditures for all the
items. Mayor Faram stated there was an increase in
personnel of approximately 9%, but if it were put in
prospective, the growth of the City over the last few years
had averaged about 8%. Mayor Faram stated he must
compliment the electorate in that they granted the City the
authority to sell the bonds that were needed for capital
improvements, particularly along Rufe Snow, that had brought
in the industry or commercial balance to help relieve the
tax burden on the homeowner. Mayor Faram stated that in
itself had played a large role in the City's ability to
reduce the tax rate. Mayor Faram stated that in working
with the budget the Council had tried to protect the $0.22
that was promised toward retiring bond indeptedness and that
portion was intact. Mayor Faram stated he was very pleased
to be able to reduce the tax rate by 12%. Mayor Faram
stated it was a great accomplishment by the Staff and
Council.
Motion carried 7-0.
29. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher,
to approve Ordinance'No. 1060.
Motion carried 7-0.
30. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Davis
to approve the Revenue Sharing Budget.
Motion carried 7-0.
31. None
32. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting to go into executive
session.
Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same
Council members and Staff were present as recorded.
Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting.
September 12, 1983
Page 9
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE PROVIDING
FOR LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF AD
VALOREM TAX AND
SETTING TAX RATE
ORDINANCE NO. 1060
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
APPROVAL OF REVENUE
SHARING BUDGET FOR
1983-84
APPROVED
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
ADJOURNMENT
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Secretary
\\.
.
. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
. .
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting conducted at the North -Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on
SePtember 23, 1983 .'
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
TTRM AnnFn TO SEPTEMBER 26. 1982 AGENDA
?h::4 Consideration of Ordinance Acting upon
.,
Texas Electric Service Company Rate
Application
-
..
-- .~
.
-
1
J
1
f
i
I
_I
I
1.
I
¡--
Î
1-
~
I
.
-
~
,
<II
.
-CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Mèeting çO'n4u-tted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers.
7301 N.E. Loop-820~. at 1:30 p.m. on September 12, 1983
/
/
- . . . .
NlJl1B ER . . , ITEM ACTION TAKEN
~/' '
6:00 P.M.
.....-. .
Joint Meetin£ of the City Council and the
Plannin~.& Zoning· Commission
, -- . "'.
1 . Discussion of New Proposed Zoning Ordinance
-.
.
.. .
.
-
THIS MEETING "'11LL BE HELD IN ROOM 100 I - -
. -
. "~ ".
. í__
-----L-
--- - ---~
_.~
;
, .
--
I
l ---
i
I
j
~~-..
i
.---+
~-=--==r
~
-or
~ ~
-CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
} '.
.or the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Ha.1~ Council Chambers,
7301 N.E~ Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on ~pptemher 12. 1983
1\TL11B ER
.' .-.
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
.' ,~"
7:00 P.M.
Discussion of Em
Coune ilman. - D ic k
cussion
nda Item II
_ ...3__
e-
of Ordinance Amendin
Duties of the Board of
nda Item II
I.- ,
-----I
i
!
:::r~:~: ::~:: :::~;;t (:;e::: ~:::~;~:~ng , __ _
5. Discussion of Re uest of Mobil Oil
for a Variance from the Si n Ordinance
(A enda Item #17)
-..-6
I
· r I
I n:iC:f"1c:c:;m) of nrñin~:orP. Amendiug_
¡ Orñ;nanf'p #3Rl Warpr ADq Se,,"e~ ~oliC~~§~
I 1.brpr 'R; 1] 5ng 'P()1 i ry r.h:mge - DeliIJouent J
I f
1_ B ~ J' f ()' - 1<'5 r c:r Tj mp (AEP,nda T t pm Ifl q) I~
j
t
I
I
ni c,.." c::c::; rrn nf
Mpmn Concernin~ Fees
--:J. -
. -...--.-
f 0'" A 1 f" f"\ 11 f'\ 1 ; r 'R P '7 P r a £ e. ~ e rm 1 t S
¡
---,_.
I
!
.
ì
I
----!
__~-t
---
~
____I
---
City of ~orth 1UcWand WlIs
.
Star of the'Metroplex
OFFICE OF
CITY MANAG~R
, '.
~
/' " .
September' 8, 1983
Ref: ACMM 0034-83
Memo to: Rodger N. Line
Ci ty Manager
From: Dennis Horvath
Assistant City Manager
Subject: l\iix Beverage/Off-Premise Beer Permits
.
The permissible permit fee for alcoholic beverages (on and off premises) was
established by City ordinance in 1973.. This ordinance is in accordance with
State law as it exists today. Basically our ordinance and the State law- allows
us to collect one-half of the State permit fee as prescribed by the Texas Penal
Code. Our problem has been collection. We have sporadically collected $5. 00
per year for both types of permits. The current law, however, does not allow
us to collect on the mix beverage establishments until the third year of their
existence and the current prescribed amount is $250. 00 (we have been
collecting $5 annually).
The law was changed by the legislature and effective September 1, 1983 our
permits on mixed beverages will be $312.50 and off-premise permits will be
$30.00. The permits that are currently issued all expire on December 31st. I
have prepåred a form letter to ·be' mailed in November to our businesses and
restaurants advising them of their permit fees.
Out total'mixed beverage and off~premise permit fees collected in December,
1982 and thus far in 1983 amount to $175.00. In December, 1983 (when
permits expire) our revenue will be $4,300. Any new off-premise establish-
ment that is authorized by the Council between now and December 31st will
also be charged a $30.00 pe'rmit fee.
.
0v~
DH/gp
Attachments
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N - E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118
.
.
.
City of J\8rth Richland Hills, Texas
.~
TO:
Rodger Line
City Manager
DATE: September 8, 1983
FROM: Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Cases to be heard by City Council on September 12, 1983
PS 83-80
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of Cross Roads Development
Company for replat of Blocks 7R & 9R,
Snow Heights North Addition.
PS 83-83
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of David Sauerwein & Gina
Potter for final plat of Lot 2, Block
1, Coulson Addition.
PS 83-86
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of C. T. Beckham for final
plat of Holiday North Addition,
Section 10.
PS 83-87
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of Steve Simpson Builders,
Inc. for replat of Lots IB-R & IC,
Block 9, Irish Meadows Addition.
PS 83-88
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of Cross Roads Development
Company for replat of Block 5,
Industrial Park Addition.
PS 83-89
APPROVED BY P & Z
Request of Mary Darling & G.C. Freeby
for replat of Lot 3R, Block 1, Valley
Park Estates.
CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT
TO ZONING ORDINANCE #179
APPROVED BY P & Z
(817) 281-Ð041n301 N.E. LOOP 82O/P.0. BOX 18&08/NOATH AICHLAND HILLS,TX 76118
To see Maps with Agenda:
Please contact City
Secretary's Office /
Municipal Records
if
DATE:
September ~, 1983
.UBJECT :.
PS 83-80 Replat of Blocks 7R & 9R, Snow Heights North Addition'
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This pro~erty is located on the north side of Lewis Drive and bounded on the
east by Holiday West Additíon and on the north by Meadow Crest Drive
-""
The reason for this replat is to change the building lines from 30 feet to 25 feet.
All Engineer's comments have been met.
The Planning ,and Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to the Engineer's comments.
.
CITY COm~CIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denìal of replat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
N/A
NO X
------------------~--------------------------------------------~~--~~-
.
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
.
2.
-,....
.
3.
.
PS 83-78
PS 83-78
APPROVED
PS 83-80
PS 83-80
APPROVED
(,;
(~. ,
. ~. ..,
.'-
approved by the City Engineer as a
completing step of approval of the
preliminary plat. This motion was
seconded by Ms. Nash and the mo on
carried 4-0.
Request of Penny
preliminary plat
Hewitt Estates.
5,
th Stembridge and
e forward to represent
Ms. Patte on. He said they had
~receive the City Engineer's letter
ey take no exception to any of
th comments except the last item
egarding fire coverage. Mr. Fluitt
said they are willing to pay the pro
rata, but the nearest 6 inch water
line is approximately 800 feet away
and would be a very large expense for
just one house"
Chairman Tucker asked if the City
Engineer was requiring a fire hydrant
or just commenting that they need one.
Mr. Bronstad said when they only have
a t inch line, the City Engineer only
makes the comment.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 83-78 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0.
....--.:,..~
Request of Cross Roads Development
Company for replat of Blocks 7R & 9R,
Snow Heights North Addition.
Jackey Fluitt with Stembridge and
Associates came forward to represent
Cross Roads Development Company. He
stated they only needed this'replat to
change the building lines from 30 feet
to 25 feet. Mr. Fluitt said they had
received the City Engineer's letter
and take no exception to th~ comments.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 83-80 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0.
, .....' ,..~
',"-,'~ -'. . ..
¡ ¡J~;tí~;·.~··
~-·';'Ii,_·-.,.~-:;.......n
"., . . ~ .~~
".,£:~~.~i.%:;, ...
.' -
'-1Þ -
...:"~.'.;."~..
t¡,,"" .
'+.;.,;...""'¥-, . ,:,.:~;,:'",~:, "'"
~'. " ;.' ."':¡"<-' .; ....~-. ...
;,;'::f·"¡
.
. ~..' .'~ Stembridge & Associates, Inc. .;
··.~~t~~~~;,~.~~1:··~·1:;~i~:,.~.~.7(~~~~~1!ff~;þ~3fj~:)·,.C..
, . 'i,~t;}~~~~'t,,'_-'
Planning & Zoning Commiss'i~ò:n'''' r*
City of. North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re:, Blocks 7R and 9R, Snow
Heights Addition, Replat
PS 83-80
In respon,se. .~.o Knowlton:-~nglish-Flower's letter dated ,August 17,1983,
we offer ~··¡tbe 'f,ollowing '-ëômmen ts : ' ... .
1. This,~~,,~~;~,^.;5~f~ s.taff fun.s.~ion.
If the.r~:-"';h'~'~îå. be any further' questions regarding this proj ect,
please'i'do"n?t hes,itate to,cal1~
Sincerely, ~
~~.
De-bert R~~ Stem' r~ 'ge 'P.E.
DRS/bb
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line) City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North R ichland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363
.
.
.
..
/1'"
{
\:.~-.;."'
(J
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 17, 1983
... Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH RI'CHLAND HILLS,
SNOW HEIGHTS ADDN., BLOCKS 7R AND 9R,
REPLAT, PS 83-80, GRID 112
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1. All utility companies should be contacted regarding this proposed replat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please
do not hesitate to call.
aJ-Wt
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l jc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
~1r. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
: ;
f/'
DATE: September 8, ~983
.UBJECT:
PS 83-83 Final plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Coulson Addition
DEP ARTMENT :
Planning .and Zoning
BACKGROUND:
This property is located on the west side of Crane Road and is east of the
G1enann Addition and south of Amundson Road.
~....
There was a variance granted by the Zoning Board of 'Adjustment on this property on
December 13, 1979 a11o,,"ing the owner to buíld on 1.96 acres.in Agricultural :zoning with
only 13 foot road frontage. Therefore, we can ,only require him to', plat this property.
All corrections have been made on the plat and they ha~e agreed to the Engineer's comments
with the exception of items #3 and 4: The pro rata has' already been paid and they will
. have a septic tank.
.
The Planning and Zoning Cormnission recommended approval of this final plat subj ect to the
Engineer's comments with the exception of items #3 and 4.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial of final plat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOU~7 N1JMBER: N/A
__________________________________________________________L~__Œ~----.--
.
.
.
.
...,.
:a~e z 5 Minutes (.,
August 25, 1983
4.
PS 83-81
/ PS 83-81
,/ APPROVED
/
/
//
5.
PS 83-82
6.
PS 83-83
c,
Request of Sabine Valley Industries
for preliminary plat. of Richfield
Subdivision.
John Barnett with Carter and Bu ess
Engineers came forward to rep sent
Sabine Valley Industries. stated
they had received the Cit Engineer's
comments and take no ex ption to
them.
Mr. Bronstad state they would be
required to over ~ze the line along
-Chapman Road.
Mr. Barnet said they have no
objectio to this if they could get
with t City Staff and agree to the
terms
M . Bowen said there are some building
ines on some corner lots that have an
off-set which our ordinance does not
allow. He stated there were 6 lots
which have the off-sets.
/
/
Mr. Barnett said they would correct
this.
Mr. Hannon said since this preliminary
plat, does not show any street names,
they should get with the fire
department for approval.
Mrs. Calvert said if they would
provide her with the street names, she
would check to see if they were
acceptable.
Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve
PS 83-81 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0.
Chairman Tucker stated they would hear
the next two requests together.
Request of David Sauerwein & Gina
Potter for preliminary plat of Lot 2,
Block 1, Coulson Addition.
Request of David Sauerwein & Gina
Potter for final plat of Lot 2, Block
I, Coulson Addition.
.
~.,.
.
.
~-
~a~e Z 6 Minutes (--
August 25, 1983
PS 83-82
APPROVED
PS 83-83
APPROVED
,_._....___ ___....._oL.__.:-O'...Jr..-:.~._.......___
-~ . . -.-----.--...--..-.-
("'~.'
."
Owen D. Long, Consulting Engineer~
came forward to repr~sent Mr.
Sauerwein and Ms. Potter. He said
they had received the City Engineer's
letter and have made the correction
requested in 'item #1; #2, the drainage
will be sheet flow, they are just
platting for one single family house
which will be built on the top of a
hill.
Mr. Long stated there was a water main
in the street, but there is no
.- off-site sewer; the sewer is 600 to
700 feet away, 'so they will have a
septic tank. He said they will
provide the city with an approved perc
test.
Mr. Bronstad asked if this was the
old Teehee property.
Mr. Sauerwein said it was.
Mr. Bronstad said the pro rata and
water tap had already been paid.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 83-82 subject to the Engineer's
comments with the exception of items
#3 & 4. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 83-83 subject to the Engineerts
comments with the exception of items
#3 & 4. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 4-0.
Chairman Tucker asked if the
representative for item #1
present.
------------
Steve~M~ullum stated he was.
.....---.
.------
.----
~~ Mr. Hannon made the motion to hear
-- item #14 at this time since there were
several in the audience for this case.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Bo~en
and the motion carried 4-0.
--;--,~..- --=-....---- ...._-~...._..._.......,._...._--... .~--_-.... -- ''!,'---.:. ..-_..--..--_.~...
.
(: . (
Owell' D. Long and ASSocIates,< Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
August ,19, 1983
..
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planni"ng and Zoning Coordinator
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Coulson Addition - Lot 2, Blk. 1
Preliminaryand,Final Plans
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
,We have reviewed your consulting engineer1s letter dated August 17,
1983 regarding our construction plans for the Coulson Addition, Lot 2,
,Block 1 and have the following comments to make regarding the items
brought up in Mr. Albin1s letter:
Item #1
A small scale vicinity map will be added to the plans.
.
Item #2 All of the lot drainage will be surface sheet flow and
, should not cause a problem.. There is a storm sewer
system to the southwest of this tract in the Glen Ann
Addition.
Item #3 The tap fee should be paid as the City will be asked
to set the meter and box.
I tern #4
No offsite sewer is proposed at this time; we only
show the location of the closest sewer system to
this tract.
Item #5
The lot is to be served by a septic system and
percolation tests will be required, if they have
not already been obtained.
We would appreciate the City's approval of our preliminary and final
plat during your next meetingo
e
ODL/ml
cc: David Sauerwein & Ginna Potter
800 Bryan Dr. - Bedford 76022
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone (817) 281-8121
f/ ~
. .., . .".
(' ,~
\;..>.'
."
(;
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINE ERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 17 t 1983
~ Planning & Z~n;ng Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-891, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
COULSON ADDITION, LOT 2, BLOCK 1,
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANS,
PS 83-82/83, GRID 71
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1. A small scale vicinity map should be provided on the plat which shows the
general location of .this proposed lot.
. 2.
We would note that a portion of this lot drains into the Glen Ann Addition
which ;s presently subject to flooding in some areas. We would request
that'the owners of adjacent property be contacted to determine if this pro-
posed development might create additional flooding problems. Any proposed
concentrated discharge points should be approved by the affected downstream
property owners. The drainage plan indicates that all runoff ;s sheet flow,
howeve r.
3. The Owner shoul d be requi red to pay hi s water tap fee for service frOOl Crane
Road in accordance with City procedures.
4. An easement should be prov1ded for the off-site sanitary sewer line which
is proposed to serve this property. Also the proposed line size and grade
should be noted on the sewer layout sheet.
5. If a portion of this lot is to be served by septic system then percolation
test results should be furnished to the City.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please
do not hesitate to call.
.
(f1i~ ·
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l jc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG,· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METR01267"3367
~.... ,
...,.
.,,)
1:1}', /,',: ']
'r
DATE:
September 8-'t ,1983
»))1
;#: ~í
I
fflBJECT :,
PS 83-86 Final plat ~f Holiday North Addition, Section 10.
D EP .ARTMEl\"1' :
Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUÑ~ :
This pr~perty is locat~d on the east side of Holiday Lane and is bounded on
the :>outh~Þy·,. the'°-TESCO right of '-'ay.
~.,. /.
There was some question regarding access to the rear portion of this property.
Mr. Hedgcoth stated when Holiday North, Section 7 is developf:d-, they will hàve access. and
they have a client~ who is interested in purchasing S,ection 7, and this sectipn._
- -They agree to pay the pro rata for ~he lines they use, but dò not f eel they should pay for
lines crossing their property they wìll not use~
. .
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended. approval of this final ,plat subject to the
-Engineer's comments, su~ject further to the plat being held by the Staff until such time it
GllÞhas been modified to sho,-, the monuments and bearings of distances on lot lines) and subject
to a notation shown on the face of ~he plat: that n9 building permits be issued on Lot 2 until
such time that - paved acc·ess is provid ed for Lot 2 froIJl_. Todd Drive.
~
CITY COUNCIL AC!ION REQUIRED:
Ef$
. ,:<>
'It: '
Approval or denial of final Dlat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
"NO ·x
ACCOUNT ~~~ER: N/A
---------------------------------------------------------~~--~~-_._-
. '.,;'..
i'
~'.
. ," fa'
.
.
.
. ,
J
..
Page 13 G.,
p & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
(
9.
PS 83-86
Request of C.T. Beckham for final plat
of Holiday North Add~tion, Section 10.
/'
Ernest Hedgcoth, ~onsulting Engineer,.
came forward to represent Mr. Beckham.
He said they'had received the City
Engineer's comments and have addressed
them in a letter. Mr. Hedgcoth said
in regard to item #6, he has discussed
this with the City Engineer and he
agreed to it.
Chairman Tucker asked if he had public
'access to all this property.
Mr. Hedgcoth said he will have access
to the back portion when Holiday North
Addition, Section 7 is developed to
the north of this property. He said
they could build a bridge over the
drainage ditch if necessary, but
rather wait. He said Todd Drive would
have access to Circle Drive when it is
developed.
Mr. Hannon asked if Todd Drive was
platted.
Mr. Hedgcoth said it was in Holiday
North, Section 7 and his client
requested he plat Todd Drive also on
his plat to facilitate the sale of his
property to a client who is interested
in purchasing Sections 7 and 10.
Mr. Hannon asked where the dividing
line was for Lots 2 and 3.
Mr. Hedgcoth said they just need to
make it Lot 2. He said the
preliminary showed Lots 2 and 3 with a
cuI de sac that touched the south line
of the property, but his client wanted
it changed so they will just have it
all in Lot 2.
Mr. Hannon said he would need to show
where the lot lines go on beth Lots 1
and 2 and also show the monuments.
.
.
.
.
... . ,.
~
Page 14 ( :
P & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
(,
Mr. Hannon said he felt it should be
put on the plat that no building
permit be issued on the back portion
of this property until proper access
is made.
/
Mr. Hedgcoth said that would be
agreeable.
Mr. Hedgcoth said they had been
working with TESCO to use their right
'of way for parking.
Mr. Bowen said item #3 of the City
Engineer's letter stated the 6 inch
line in Todd Drive should be increased
to an 8 inch line and be extended
westward from Todd Drive to Holiday
Land and connect, but Mr. Hedgcoth has
requested the city pay for it. He
asked Mr. Bronstad if the city would
pay this.
Mr. Bronstad said the city would not.
Mr. Hedgcoth said they would extend
the line.
Councilman Davis asked why the
Subdivision Ordinance requires him to
do that.
Mr. Bronstad said the city has to
update its lines to service
Multi-Family and Local Retail zoned
property.
Councilman Davis said he could not see
why he would be required to connect
the two lots when he has a 12 inch
line in Holiday Lane and an 8 inch
line to serve Lot 2. He said it
looks like if he could provide
adequate fire protection, he would not
have to connect the two lines.
Mr. Bronstad said there is only a 6
inch line coming in from Circle Drive
and we have to have a minimum of an 8
inch line.
. .
Page 15 (
p & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
.
PS 83-86
APPROVED
~
/'
10. PS 83-87
.
//
~:~'- -------------,
( .'-
\._~.
Councilman Davis said he understands
now.
Mr. Hannon made ~he motion to approve
PS 83-86 subject to the Engineer's
comments, subject further to the plat
being held by the Staff until such
time it has been modified to show the
monuments and the bearings of
distances on lot lines and subject to
a notation shown on the face of the
plat that no building permits be
issued for Lot 2 until such time that
'paved access is provided for Lot 2
from Todd Drivè. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion
carried 4-0.
Request of Steve Simpson Builders,
Inc. for replat of Lots IB-R and
Block 9, Irish Meadows Addition
Chairman Tucker said since is a
replat in single family oning, they
are required by law t have a Public
Hearing. He opene the Public Hearing
and called for ose wishing to speak
in favor of t s request to please
come forwa
Tom V t, Engineer, came forward to
re esent Mr. Simpson. He said they
ad received the City Engineer's
letter and have made all the additions
he requested.
//
/'
//
/
Mr. Bronstad stated there will have to
be an extension of the sewer line to
serve Lot IC and an additional water
tap will be needed to serve it.
Mr. Bowen asked Mrs. Calvert about the
IF-7 zoning classification which we no
longer have. He asked if they would
have to have a zoning change.
Mrs. Calvert said they should have a
zoning change, but the city has been
just requiring them conform to the
IF-8 zoning classification.
...-----.----..-----.--.----.-.
.
.
.
. <
í~ ..
( .. '..,
\ ..
.....c_<
ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers',
/~"
.»
PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING
Roger Line, City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. 18609
North ~.f{ichland Hills, Texas 76118
. .
/'. .-
Re: Holiday North Addition Section 10
Final Plat PS 83-86
"".,.
Dear Roger:
In reference to the engineering review letter of July 19 and
August 17, 1983 for the preliminary and final plat for the
Holiday North Addition Section 10 the pro rata share of the existing
sewer lines which cross the tract are as follows:
Sewer Line
Len at'h
Pro rata per ~.F
24-inch
IO-inch
B-inch
364'
440'
540'
$11.'00
11.00
5.50
Since it is unusual for threE; line to cross one property my client
C.T. Beckham ~equest that we pay onl~ th~ prorata for the line which
is used. If at any time the other lines are used he will pay the
prorata. I have talked with Allen Bronstad concerning this and he
did not see any problem.
Your cooperation in approving this request is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely
235 Livestock Exchange Building · 131 East Exchange Avenue · Fort Worth, Texas 76106 . 817.625.5504
.. .
c:
(-.,
\b;J-
ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers
.
PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING
August 25, 1983
Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
City çf~Noiih Richland Hills
p·.o. .Box ~1860~
North Riehl'and Hi lIs, Texas 76118
....
RE: Holiday North Addition - Section 10
Final Plat PS 83-86
Dear Mrs. Cal.ve·rt:
I have received the August 17, 1983 letter from Richard Albin, of Knowl-
ton, English, Flowers, Inc. concerning the engineering comments for the
Holiday North Addition Section 10. The following items are referenced
in accordance with Richard's letter:
1. Reference to items 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 in the July 19, 1983 letter:
.
4. Mobil Pipeline will be notified of any construction on their
easement.
6. Richard had agreed "n" value used in our design 0.0225 is ade-
quate. (via phone conversation 8-25-83).
7. Adequate fire protection will be placed on the architectural
design for the site.
9. The developer agrees to pay a pro rata share of the existing
sanitary sewer line that is utilized for this development. The
project should not be required to pay pro rata for 'sewer lines
that cross the property but are not used.
10. The developer will pay the pro rata share of the water line in
Holiday Lane. (777.68 fe'et at $5.50, $4277.24)'.
11. The building set back lines will be placed on the plat.
2. The necessary signatures will be placed on the plat.
3. The developer will increase the water line to 8 inches. Since the
requested looping will benefit the City the developer request that
the City pay for the additional water line required.
Sincerely,
. ,,6~z-~~;é/
Ernest Hedgcoth, P.E.
(~or1sul ting Engineer
235 Livestock Exchange Building · 131 East Exchange Avenue · Fort Worth, Texas 76106 · 817..625.5504
..... J -
t .. · "
r'
\ t .
~~;""
(
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Wor.th- Dallas
August ¡? :" 1983.,
~ Plånning & Zoning'Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-811, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
HOLIDAY NORTH, SECTION 10,
FINAL PLANS, PS 83-86, GRID 113
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
.
We would refer you to our review letter dated July 19, 1983, regarding case
no. PS 83-62, preliminary plat. Please note jtems 4 and 6 regarding .drainage
considerations, item 7 regarding inadequate fire coverage, items 9 and 10
regarding pro rata considerations, and item 11 concerning building setback
line on Holiday Lane.
2. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement along with Notary
Certification should be fully executèd before approval.
1.
3. The proposed 6-inch line in Todd Drive should be increased to an 8-inch
line as required for M.F. zoning. Also the Public Works Department has
requested that this 1 ine be extended westward fr'OOl Todd Drive and tied
into the existing 12-inch main in Holiday Lane for better circulation
and system looping, and we would concur with this recommendation.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please
do not hesitate to call.
r~~
ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l jc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
c..!_. .
.
. "'It:'
c'~·
(,,~,
'C._ '
ç
c-: '. ',~.
\Ç.~.
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 19, 1983~
. ~
þ .
-f.'l anni'ng'· & Zon; ng Comm; s s; on
.. C; ty /"of Nórth Ri ch 1 and Hi 11 s
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
1.
2.
. 3.
4.
5.
..
Re: 3-902, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
HOLIDAY NORTH ADDN., SECTION 10,
PRELIMINARY PLAT, PS 83-62, GRID 113
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
The preliminary plat should be sealed and certified by a Registered
Professional Engineer before approval.
The phone number of the Owner should be noted on the preliminary plat.
The volume and page recording of the existing 35 foot mobil pipeline
easement should be noted on the plat.
Any proposed construction on or near the'Mobil Pipeline easement should
be approved in writing by the Mobil Pipe Line Company.
TESCO should be ad vi sed of this proposed development and the impact of
increased stormwater discharge on their right-of-way. The develo~er's
engineer should verify that the downstream channel has at least a 10 year
capacity, and written approval from the downstream property owner for
receiving increased concentrated runoff should be furnished to the City.
6. The hydraulic roughness coefficient (n=0.0225) used by the developer's
engineer to evaluate the capacity of Calloway Branch, and a side tributary
channel, appears to be too "smooth". Chowl s "Open Channel Hydraul ics"
on p. 118 shows an n-factor of 0.022 to represent "cement-plaster lining
applied directly to the trimmed surface of the earth channel. With weeds
in broken places and loose sand on bottom.p The engineer should demonstrate
that the condition of the improved channels ;s consistent with the n-factor
used. Also since these channels will be in dedicated easer;¡ents, the City
''Jill be responsible for future maintenance to this high perfonnance standard.
7.
Adequate fire hydrant coverage protection does not appear to be provided
based on the 300-foot radius criteria required for L.R. and ¡·1.F. zoning.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283·6211. M.ETRO/267.3367
.
~ þ ~,
C.~-..:;;
..-
f'
~,,~': .
Page 2, Planning & Zoning Commission, July 19, 1983
-. /'
. ~
.
,
.
.
8. The water and sewer grid maps sryow a 24-inch sanitary sewer 1 ine crossing
this property in the vicinity of the Mobil gas pipeline, but this sewer
line is not shown on the preliminary plat. The existance and location of
this sewer line should be verified and shown on the plat along with its
easement if such easement exists.
9. The developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the 24-inch
and lO-inch sanitary sewer lines which cross this property along with the
8-inch sewer line located along the north property line of this develop-
ment. We would estimate pro rata on the basis of an equivalent a-inch
line for the 24-inch and lO-inch mains and one-half of an a-inch main
for the other line:
Sewer Line Length Pro ra ta pe r L. F .
24-inch 364' $11.00
lO-inch 440' 11.00
8-inch 540' 5.50
10. The developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the
existing 12-inch water line in Holiday Lane. We would estimate pro
rata at $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of an equivalent 8-inch
line for a total length of 777.68 feet.
11. Building set back lines of 25-feet should be provided on Holiday Lane
and along either side of Todd Drive as such lines shown on the plat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivison, please
do not hesitate to call.
æ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Linè, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
o '-:. A ..
..
.
-, ;¡tó..=
. .
7~"·::.-·.-: :-:~-
.:......---. -.
.... þ .- - _!
.. ,~-".;,:p..
-; _.....--::.. ~_.
'.
".~.--. ...~.:::- -l ""'~'.;-
eo... . ._ . ..;
.. . -. . . ..
- :@ll:~? ~;;
..- -'. ...-
.. :,:"~::..,,...,;.
. ." :. ~... -.. ., ..~:"" ..
:'J :,~~~~;:
~..;; :.~..:-:i~~J.:-"~·.
/,-
I /"'-'
ì...\. _~.<
~-:~..:
0,:
,~~:/
'"6: ~
~ -¡ 0ã) -ö
~-= ~.,g
Q CJ ..
E ~. ·s 5
~ ~ E 8
c Co) :: s:
:::; c:s,.. D') =
__ .t:J t: .: .;
~~....3 -
__ Q -:þ CO.£
=.!:j c. Q -- =
0..0 c.Q c)'"
~ g =. '- tIC
..8i'5= .s,::
00- è C
.~-g.g~~ fc
t è ~ C).. C) ] .~
~ ~ f:E-S ~~
"",~B~ s c·
'? .;; -c;:: g ~.. ~ ~
-c ,.. Co) Co) c '- -
-:g~Ë.£ ~~
~.~-o ~ ~~
=~~= ~Q
o .: c:: ..l. ~ ~
""C c >"i) "",-
~-;5~ =Æc.
::: ~~.c ~..
_.~_= o_~
~.: Ce it ::ö C,)
_ _ .:::J'~
Q~ð~· 8 ~
t:f ~ II:
~~ga cr5~
~~~ it S:.:
o cO C> C 0 -'~"'.-'
. , ~ I ; 1.£ _.". '.!-.:. _:~.
. _ .:.'~ ~ . ~.~=-; . c ~
- - ". ~.~~ .'
~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ...:?~-, -
'- . ~ ~ ~ ;, . i :.:~ ~
."
Q
.:;t
.§
êi
c
=
~ CI C,}
II)
~ '- .c
., -
.¡ 0
Co) .:
~ -~ -:;J ;;1j::.i..
-. .. -.. .....
. -
..,
-2
..
~
-=
..,
. . .
. - '~
.. - . :!'~.
-= ~~.
.- -
_. -
'.
-. '
........:.... "
..... .-." ~ -."
". .... f"
...... - .
~ : ~¥~.~.
':..7"·" .
..... : ..
. "." ,.' ..
.t. ...- A:o-·. . ~--...
._ ,"I "~ 'r- .--
-\.-.- -,,-.:".-:,: -~. -,.
-.J~ _'
.. ,. i ..~>:~~..- ~ .. '.-
~ ':" ........
. ~'-:.-.~,-_.
. ..'-.. .
... . ... ......, -.. ..-
..........
. ~ ---'.;.....-
""¡~~"-':-~:;::}gi;~~::,-,?~ '..
.... ~~. -...
.. .:~.~~~,,:' .
,......
e.
~
~
. ~ ~ g æ .::- ~ .
è ~- -,'.~.
- ~ ë-= ¿
~ ~~ ~ ;
'T~~~.2
!'::, c: o~ ~ ~
0- ~ --= ..!:
'9 .,¡,,).. c. - Co) CQ
~~c::~~=
è .- =:.c~-
~ ~.: E'¡
cz:; ~ -= .~
~.. '- .: '"E
s£.!:-::
~ ~ :; >:
= ~ t ~
..3 ~ : ~
.~ ~ ~ ~
....0 ü
~~~i
o C :: .....
OO~;
D h:S I
~ s: ~ ¡::
~cO~
-
~
DATE:
September 8~ ,1983
.SUBJECT :.
PS 83-87 Replat of Lots lB-R & IC, Block 9, Irish Meadows Addition
DEP ARTMENT :
Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND:
This pro~erty is located north side of Emerald Hills Way and west of the
school.
""t...
This was a large lot and they wish to make two lots out of it. The zoning is IF-7 which
we no longer have~ but the lots meet the IF-8 requirement.
. ··All corrections have been made on tbe plat.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, approval of this replat subject to the
.Engineer' s comments.
.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCO~7 NL~ER: N/A
________________________________________________________~~__C~----.-
.
.
......
~
.
..
Page 15
p & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
PS 83-86
APPROVED
/.
10. PS 83-87
c.
,<"
c.
Councilman Davis said he
now.
Mr. Hannon made the ion to approve
PS 83-86 subje~ 0 the Engineer's
comments, s~ect further to the plat
being~h~bY the Staff until such
timé~"it has been modified to show the
~-/~~onuments and the bearings of
A~~-~ distances on lot lines and subject to
/.?/~ a notation ShOWD on the face of the
plat that no building permits be
issued for Lot 2 until such time that
. paved access is provided for Lot 2
from Todd Drive. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion
carried 4-0.
Request of Steve Simpson Builders,
Inc. for replat of Lots IB-R and IC,
Block 9, Irish Meadows Addition.
Chairman Tucker said since this is a
replat in single family zoning, they
are required by law to have a Public
Hearing. He opened the Public Hearing
and called for those wishing to speak
in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Tom Vogt, Engineer, came forward to
represent Mr. Simpson. He said they
had received the City Engineer's
letter and have made all the additions
he requested.
Mr. Bronstad stated there ~ill have to
be an extension of the sewer line to
serve Lot lC and an additional water
tap will be needed to serve it.
Mr. Bowen asked Mrs. Calvert about the
IF-7 zoning classification which we no
longer have. He asked if they would
have to have a zoning change.
Mrs. Calvert said they should have a
zoning change, but the city has been
just requiring them conform to the
IF-8 zoning classification.
.
.
Page 16 ("..
p & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
,
,
.....
/'
PS 83-87
APPROVED
--~-'~~-"11~~pš~-83:-8ã~'-
PS 83-88
APPROVED
12. PS 83-89
. Á-- - . -----..-...- ____H____
. "' ...r-'''''
.'
~
('.
Mr. Vogt said the lots are plenty
large for the 1F-8 requirement.
Chairman Tucker called for anyone
wishing to speak in opposition to this
replat to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 83-87 subject to the Engineer's
. comments. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0.
Request of Cross Roads Development
Company for replat of Block 5,
Industrial Park Addition.
Jackey Fluitt with Stembridge d
A~sociates came forward to present
Cross Roads Development C pany. He
said they have receive the City
Engineer's letter aDd take no
exception to the ,C£mments.
//
Mr. Bowen m~é the motion to approve
PS 83-88 ...sú'bj ec t to the Engineer I s
commen~s~ This motion was seconded by
Mr. E~nnon and the motion carried 4-0.
./.....
.....Request of Mary Darling & G. C. Freeby
~ for replat of Lot 3R, Block 1, Valley
Park Estates.
Chairman Tucker said since this is a
replat in single family zoning, they
must have a Public Hearing. He opened,
the Public Hearing and called for
those wishing to speak in favor of
this replat to please come forward.
Mary Darling came forward. She said
they are requesting to replat two lots
into one lot. Ms. Darling said they
had received the City Engineer's
comments and have made the úecessary
changes.
- - --.-.--.-----------
.~ .~. ' .
.
l
~~,
KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 17, 19~~..
,. .
.
.,. Planning & Zoning,Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
1.
2.
. 3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
.
Re: 3-909, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
IRISH MEADOWS ADDN., LOT IB-R & IC,
BLOCK 9, REPLAT, PS 83-87, GRID 106
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
Property corner monumentation should be noted on the plat.
The Commission and Council Endorsement block~ presented on the plat do not
conform to the proper format as shown in the Subdivision Ordinance.
The Owner1s address and phone number should be noted on the plat.
The existing platting lot lines on the east side of lot lC should be shown
on the plat.
The area measurement of the two lots should be noted on the plat.
The existing zoning (IF-7) should be noted on the plat.
All utility companies should be contacted regarding this replat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please
do not hesitate to call.
(~
RWA/l jc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 8,7/283-621,· METRO/267-33,67
t~~ f
September 8" 1983
DATE:
.UBJECT :.
PS 83-88 Replat of Block 5, Industrial Park Addition
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This property is located at the northwest corner of Rufe Snow Drive and
Industrial Pàrk Blvd.
~~
All corrections have been made on the plat.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended appro~al of this rep¡at subj~c~ to the
"Engineer 1 s èomments.
.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approval or denìal of replat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
N/A
NO X
---------------------------------------------------------~~-~~---_.._-
..
Page 16
p & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
/
(.'
','
'----- -
.
..,....
/'
:. ~
PS 83-8ì ~
AP~
11. PS 83-88
.
PS 83-88
APPROVED
12. PS 83-89
e_-.-.---- -
--.....-----...---.----.--------- ~--- -..---
(,.
Mr~ Vogt said the lots are Plen~
large for the IF-8 r~qu~r£~t.
/---
----~
Chairman Tucke}:.-{:.~ííed for anyone
wishing tp/sþeak in opposition to this
replat'~ please' come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 83-87 subject to the Engineer's
. comments. This motion was seconded by
MS. Nash and the motion carried 4-0.
Request of Cross Roads Development
Company for replat of Block 5,
Industrial Park Addition.
Jackey Fluitt with Stembridge and
Associates came forward to represent
Cross Roads Development Company. He
said they have received the City
Engineer's letter and take no
exception to the comments.
Mr.' Bowen made the motion to approve
· PS 83-88 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 4~O.
Request of Mary Darling & G.C.
for replat of Lot 3R, Block 1,
Park Estates.
Chairman Tucker sai--d-/;ince this is a
replat in singl'e family zoning, they
must have'~ Public Hearing. He opened
the Public Hearing and called for
those ~ishing to speak in favor of
this replat to please come forward.
Mary Darling came forward. She said
they are requesting to replat two lots
into one lot. y~. Darling said they
had received the City Enginper's
comments and have made the úecessary
changes.
.-
'l~...;_;.:'_: ,.:" ."_;.;~ :~; ,~ -.~~- ':.... ~~ .
;';!'t~'!f~f
....~ ~i~~;'·~' ':"~'
.' , ,',' """""" ','.,", .,"'. ;',,:,..'
0< ·?...··~~"~~~~·~~i~i .
..,;¡:~:" .-\r~;,~
;, .'..... ~'., ~~~~~T, .r~':j·~{'~ .',.:~~.
", "'~'~~:·"-:,1.~~i:!i~gt~:i~~~·,#~J,~~~;.>~~::~.~< ' "" , _~', .c"
. . ::~ ';"," "; ~ ~. ~- ; ;':;}:Æ~i¡~f;~';£(..-- -. . . . .. ~~~
%ti~#:~f;:Ft,¡·~~1{~2"·? };.,:-;..;; ~ ,
7.&~if~;"¿'~;t; . r.·" .
':'~,:~,;;.~, '-.::' ,: ':
,,~'~1,:' :.
~.-.' :..... .....:.........,. -~
" ,. c:-;~;~:~:;'" .
- ,
StefD.~~!dg~,& ~sso.ciate~1 I nc.'~:..,.
. ;~;·.;~H;~'~~~~ti~g·~~9i*;;;;'~59'~'ë.t:':,:,;~:,;,;,;,,·..
., ,:' "''1''
- \
August .'19, 1983~,~
'''1J -' '.' ~ t /,~-
.
.
.
.
.. .. "...... .
Planning -&:ZònîngCommissïön;¡·.Ji:ji¡·:_.¿/::~·f~£~r;i; ...
City of North 'Riehl and Hills " ,'. '.
7301 N.E.Loop 820
North Ric~J,a.-E-~:II~lls) Texas'
'": -"_1 _~--. ~: ~....: ~ :-.-
.. -., . ~.~ ,~ :;:~~Uf.~~:~ -~ 'R e .:
or "'~"
r.
f
Lots , ,2,3~ & 4,Block 5
Industrial Park Addn., Replat
PS 83-88
..
-,' -.;& . -~
In response"Cto Know1ton-Eng1ìsh~Flowers.letter dated August 17, 1983,
we offer the following comments: '
1. Owner.·.s,:.-P~,~I?-~ numb~r~~s. be~n added to the pIa t-.,.
.,-):~f>·'~;~~~,0·,,~7::':· , '. " -:.,,~.-,~=~~H:.' '., -'~~;:~~"_"" _
2. . Proper.ty:·:,ç.~rn'er,monum_eI1.-,,~.a_tion.has'~e'e'n added.
~ ~ . ~ ..' ... ..
3. The existing zoning has been added.
4. A vicinity map has been added to the plat.
5. This is,"a. c,ity staff funëtian.
If there should be any further questions regarding this project,
please do not hesitate 6~~call.
Sincerely,
~{¿£¿1~·~P.E.
DRS/bb
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
uite 10 . North Richland Hills Texas 76118 . 817 284-1363
, .
¡"" "
, )
~
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
August 17, 1983·
Planniñg .& Zon"ìng Commission
~ Cíty of North ·Ric·hland Hill s
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-897, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDN., LOTS lR, 2, 3, & 4,
BLOCK 5, REPLAT, PS 83-88, GRID 102
.
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1. The Owner1s phone number should be noted on the plat.
2. Property corner monumentat;on should be noted on the plat.
3. The existing zoning (Industrial) should be noted on the plat.
4. A small scale vicinity map should be presented on the plat showing the
general location of the platting.
5. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat.
Should you have any questions concerning, the review of this subdivision, please
do not hesitate to call.
W'
RWA/l j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, D;rector of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
.
.
.
...
. ..
\....
J'
, -
....
..f
(~'
(,
LV ~ ~
Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer
TESCO Region Engr. Mgr.
P.O. Box 970
Fort Worth, TX 76101
~
. ~
/'
RE: City File Reference Number PS 83-88
Industrial Park Addition, Block 5, Lots lR, 2, 3, & 4
Address or Location: Northwest corner -of Rufe Snow Drive and
Industrial Park Boulevard
Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the
proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office.
Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning
Coordinator on one (1) copy of this form no later than August 15, 1983.
Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office.
v-
Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor
corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments)
Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made.
(See Comments)
COMMENTS:
...--"
-!.J FOOT EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC
DISTRIBUTiON FACILITIES, AS SHOWN
ON THE ATTACHED SKETCH.
TESCO: DATE
SIGNATURE l.."-vi. 9. ~~>.?f
SIGNATURE -2/ ~ (!.~
CITY:
DATE: August 4, 1983
..' . ..
DATE: September 8, 1983
. SUBJECT:
PS 83-89 Replat of Lot 3R~ Block I, Valley Park Estates
DEPARTMENT :
BACKGROUND:
Planning· and Zoning,
This pro?ertv is located on the east side of Crane Road and approximately
176 feet north of Martin Roàd.
..,.
They are taking two lots and making one large lot.
All corrections have been made on the plat.
The Planning and Zonin~ Conunission r.ecommended approval of thi.s replat subj ect to the
Engineer's comments.
.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial of replat .'
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
x
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
------------------~-----------------------------------------~~--_<:?~
.
Page 16
P & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
w
.,.....
/'
PS 83-87
APPROVED
11. PS 83-88
.
83-88
APPROVED
PS 83-89
'.
(.
(
\ .
,-,. ,~'
Mr. Vogt said the lots are plenty
large for the IF-8 r~quirement.
Chairman Tucker called for anyone
wishing to speak "in oppositio~.;(o this
,,;
replat to please come forwar~.
There being no one Wi~h~to speak,
tbe Chairman closed/the Public
H·/'
ear~ng. /
Mr. Bo'-'en ~~the motion to approve
PS 83-87/~j;ct to the Engineerls
·commeFrS. Thi~ motion was seconded by
~NaSh and the motion carried 4-0.
Request of Cross Roads Development
Company for replat of Block 5,
Industrial Park Addition.
Jackey Fluitt with Stembridge and
Associates came forward to represent
Cross ~oads Development Company. He
said they have received the City
Engineer's letter and take no
exception to the comments.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 83-88 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 4-0.
Request of Mary Darling & G.C. Freeby
for replat of Lot 3R, Block 1) Valley
Park Estates.
Chairman Tucker said since this is a
replat in single family zoning, they
must have a Public Hearing. He opened.
the Public Hearing and called for
those wishing to speak in favor of
this replat to please come forward.
Mary Darling came forward. She said
they are requesting to replat two lots
into one lot. YŒ. Darling said they
had received the City Engineer's
comments and have made the úecessary
changes.
.
..,.
.
,..-
-_//
~-- ---
Page 17
P & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
/
:PS :83~89
APPROVED
13. PZ 83-52
//
/
,;
/'
(".....-
t\.~ )~~
(~~.
.1Ioc.... ."
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
replat to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
MS. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 83-89 subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0.
·Request of Muhsen Shabout to rezone a
portion of Lot '2, Block 11, Emerald
Hills Addition, from its present
classification of IF-7-0ne Family
Dwellings to a proposed class if· cation
of Local Retail. This prope y is
located on the east side 0 Davis
Boulevard and is bounde on the south
by the YMCA.
Jack Roseberry c e forward to
represent Mr. about. He said Mr.
Shabout has een a resident of North
Richland lIs for 18 months and he
now des· es to build something nice on
this roperty.
r. Roseberry said Mr. Thompson with
YMCA and a representative of Henry S.
Miller Company are here to answer .any
questions the Commission might have.
//
/
/
Mr. Bowen asked if Mr. Shabout had any
plans for the property.
'"
/~
/'"
Mr. Roseberry said if it is
economically feasible, Mr. Shabout
would like to put a Day Care Center on
the back portion of this property.
Arthur Thompson with YMCA came
forward. He said they are in favor of
this zoning change.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
---. .... - - --- --. -------- ------------~ ----- ------------ --.--..--
.
.Þ
(
()
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
August 17, 1983'
.
~ P1anni~ & ~onjng. Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re:
3-971, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS!
VALLEY PARK ESTATES, LOT 3R, BLOCK ,
REPLAT, GRID 80, PS 83-89
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1. The Owner's address should be noted on the plat.
2. The existing zoning should be noted on the prat (IF-12).
. 3. We would note that the minimum required building setback for IF-12 zoning
is 30 feet -- only 25 feet is provided.
4. The Commission and Council Endorsement Blocks do not confo rm to the fo nna t
presented in the Subdivision Ordinanee.
5. The acreage of lot 3R should be noted on the plat.
6. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision~ please
do not hesitate to call.
~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/l jc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
.,A"" ,
DATE:
September 8. ,1983
.UBJECT :.
Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #179
DEP ARTMENT :
BACKGROUND:
Planning and Zoning
This amendment is in regard to the duties of the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
..,.~
There was only one person who spoke regarding this amendme~t, Jack Roseperry, Chairman of
our Zoning Board of Adjustment. He was concerned about the legality of restricting the
duties of the ZBA.
·The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this amendment t'o the Zoning
Ordinance #179.
.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
-----------------------------------------------------------~~-Q~-----
.
Page 21
P & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
.
18. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT
TO ZONING ORDINANCE #179
APPROVED
, .
~
.
~ECÉS~
BACK TO ORDER
.
e
Chairman Tucker stated there were
copies available for the audience to
read.
Chairman Tucker called a recess at
9:38 P. M. to allow time to read the
amendment.
Chairman Tucker called the meeting
back to order at 9:48 P. M. with the
same members present.
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak regarding this amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance #179 regarding
the duties of the Zoning Board of
Adjustment to please come forward.
Jack Roseberry, Chairman of North
Richland Hills Zoning Board of
Adjustment, came forward. He stated
he has no interest in this except in
the office he holds as Chairman. Mr.
Roseberry stated he had been on this
Board for 9 or 10 years and he would
admit when he was first placed on the
Board, he did not know a lot about it
and it's responsibilities and duties
and may have made some poor
judgements.
Mr. Roseberry said when copies of the
new proposed Zoning Ordinances came
out and he read the portion regarding
the Zoning Board of Adjustment, he
felt something was trying to be done
that should not be.
Mr. Roseberry stated he had done
extensive study regarding the Zoning
Board of Adjustment. He gave copies
of the State Enabling Act to the Board
and read from page 206:
Page 22
p & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
.
..,.
/'
"The Board of Adjustment shall have
the following powers:
1. To hear and decide appeals where
- it is alleged there is error in any
order, requirement, decision, or
determination made by an administrative
official in the enforcement of this
Act or of any ordinance adopted
pursuant thereto.
2. To hear and decide special
exceptions to the terms of the
ordinance upon which such Board is .
required to pass under such ordinance.
3. To authorize upon appeal in
specific cases such variance from the
terms of the ordinance as will not be
contrary to the public interest,
where, owing to special conditions, a
literal enforcement of the provisions
of the ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship, and so that the
spirit of the ordinance shall be
observ~d and substantial justice,
done."
.
Mr. Roseberry said #2 has been left
out of this new amendment. He said he
does not feel the city has the right
to take away the power of the Zoning
Board of Adjustment that the State has
given them.
Mr. Roseberry stated the courts rely
on the Zoning Board of Adjustment for
their decisions and in most cases,
they uphold the decision of the Board.
He said he has data on 50-60 recent
cases in Dallas and Fort Worth where
this has happened.
Mr. Roseberry gave copies of Hurst
Zoning Ordinance regarding their
Zoning Board of Adjustment and copies
of a newspaper article about the City
of Watauga being told by the court to
form a Zoning Board of Adjustment.
e
There was much discussion between the
Planning and Zoning Commission and Mr.
Roseberry regarding the pros and cons
of this amendment.
Page 23
P & Z Minutes
August 25, 1983
.
Chairman Tucker closed the Public
Hearing.
Chairman Tucker said he had requested
the City Manager get a legal opinion
from the City Attorney regarding this
amendment.
...
/'
Chairman Tucker instructed the
Commission to consider what has been
brought up and the amendment in
question, and make a decision that
would be good for all concerned.
Mr. Hannon made the motion to
recommend approval of this amendment
to the Zoning Ordinance #179. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and
the motion carried 4-0.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at IO:25'P. M.
.
CHAIRMAN, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
.
·
ORDINANCE NO. j oS5
Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, that Ordinance No. 179, "Zoning Ordinance", adopted November 13, 1967, and as
heretofore áminded~ be and the same is hereby amended as Article XXXVII all sections
tò read as /'follóws'":
ARTICLE XXVII
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
SECTION I.
CREATION
There is hereby created a Board of Adjustments consisting of five (5)
members and two (2) alternates each to be appoi¿ted by a majority of the
City Council for a term of two (2) years and removable for cause by the
appointing authority. It is the declared policy of the City Council that it
will consider and appoint only those persons who have demonstrated their
civic interest, general knowledge of the. community, independent judgment,
... and availability to prepare for and attend meetings.
~ECTIQN II. TERMS OF OFFICE
The members shall serve for a period of ·two (2) years and· until their
successors are duly appointed. Qualified board members may be appointed
to succeed themselves.
SECTION III.
VACANCY
Vacancies shall be filled for unexpired terms; no member shall be
appointed for a term in excess o~ two (2) years. A vacancy in a term 'of
office shall occur whenever the City Council finds that membe~- bas' .
resigned, has not maintained the qualifications required for appointment or
has been removed by City Council for cause.
SECTION IV.
ORGANIZATION
The board shall elect a chairman from among its members to preside at
meetings. Such chairman, or in his absence an acting ,chairman elected
from among the members, may administer oaths and compel the attendance
of witnesses. The board shall designate the time and place of its
meetings. The board may adopt roles to govern its proceedings,
provided however, that such rules are not inconsistent with this
ordinance. All meetings of the board shall be open to the public. The
board shall keep a record of its proceedings in accordance with state law
and these regulations.
..
1
SECTION V.
.
MEETINGS AND QUORUM
Four ,(4) members ,of the board shall constitute a quorum for the conduct
of business. The members of the board shall regularly attend meetings
and public hearings of the board and shall serve without compensation.
Minutes shall be kept showing the vote of each member on each question or
the absence or failure of each member to vote. Such minutes shall be a
public record and shall be retained for at least five (5) years.
SECTION VI.
41.
.
DUTI~S AND POWERS
,
,
~ The Boárd of Adjustment shall bave the powers and exercise the duties of
a Board in accordance with Article 10.11(g), Revised Civil Statutes of
Texas. Board members are representatives of the city and shall have the
right to inspect premises where required in the discharge of their
responsibilities under the laws of the State of Texas and the ordinances of
the City of North ~ichland ,Hills. The boards jurisdiction shall extend to
and include the hearing and deciding of the following topics of appeals and
applications and to t~at end shall have the necessary authority to ensure
continuing compliance with its decision. -
1.
Interpretation:
To render an interpretation of the Zoning regulations
or the manner of their application where it is alleged
that there is error in any order~ requirement, or
determination made by the Enforcing Officer in the
administration of such provisions. In reaching its
decision, the Board shall establish firm guidelines for
future "administrative actions on like manners.
2. Variance:
To authorize upon appeal in specific cases such
variance from the terms of this ordinance as ~ill not
be contrary to the public interest. However, the
board shall not have the power to grant variances from
tbe terms of this ordinance dealing with density,
minimum parking, loading space requirements, or
building lipe requirements in 2F-9, MF, NR, LR, C, I, and
PD zone districts. Variances shall not be" authorized unless
the Board makes an affirmative finding to all the following
requiremen~s:
(a) That literal enforcement of the controls will create an
unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty in the
development of the affected property.
(b) That the situation causing the hardship or
difficulty is neither self-imposed nor generally
affecting all or most properties in the same
zoning district.
(c) That the relief sought will not injure the
permitted use of adjacent conforming property.
Cd), That the granting of the variance will be in
harmony ~ith the spirit and purposes of these
regulations.
·CTION VII.
3. No variance shall be granted except on the concurring vote
of four (4) members of the board.
INTERPRETATION REQUEST:' VARIANCE APPEAL
A request for interpretation of regulations or an appeal for variance from
a certain Development Controls may be taken by any person aggrieved or
by any officer, depa~tment, or board of the city affected by a decision of
the Enforcing Officer. Such appeal shall be taken within fifteen (15) days
time after th~ decision has been rendered, by filing with the Enforcing
Officer i notice of appeal specifying the grounds thereof. The Enforcing
"? Officér" sháll: forth'-'ith transmit to the board all papers constituting the
record upon which the action being appealed was taken from.
SECTION VIII. STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
An appeal shall stay all proceedings of the action appealed from unless the
Enforcing Officer after the notice of appeal has been filed with him
certifies to the board that, by reason of facts stated in his certificate, a
stay would, in his opinion cause imminent peril to life or property. In
such case, proceedings shall not be stayed except by a restraining order
which may be granted by the board or by a court of record.
SECTION IX.
FORM OF APPEAL OR APPLICATION
.
The appeal or application shall. be in such form and shall contain such
information as the board may require under its Rules of Procedure. It
shall be accompanied by the required fee. An incomplete appeal or
application shall be deemed only to give notice of intent to appeal or apply
to the board and shall not be reviewed or scheduled for hearings until
brought to completion.
SECTION X.
NOTICE OF HEARING
Official written notice of public hearing on every application for a variance
or for an interpretation of regulations applying solely to an individual
property shall be sent to all owners of property, or the person rendering
the same for taxes, affected by such application, located within "two
hundred (200) feet of any property affected thereby, excluding> any
intervening public street, at leas~ ten (10) days before such hearing is
held. Such notice shall be served by using the last known address as
listed on the city tax roll and depositing the notice, postage paid, in the
United States Mail. Notice of hearings shall also be given by causing
publication of the time and place of such hearing in the official newspaper
at least ten (10) days prior thereto, together with a brief description of
the subject matter of the hearing.
SECTION XI.
HEARING
..
(a) Upon the hearing, any party may appear in person or by
attorney or agent. Evidence supporting the grant or denial of
an appeal shall be submitted only through the Enforcing Officer
or to the board in public meeting.
(b) Any appeal or application may be ~ithdrawn upon written notice to
the_Enforcing Officer but no appeal shall be withdrawn after
posting of hearing notice and prior to board action thereon
without' formal consent of the board.
.
SECTION XII.
~
.
(c) The board shall make its 'decision on any application within
forty-five (45) days from the time the initial ,hearing is held or
the application will be deemed to have been denied.
DECISION AND VOTING
.
,
(a) Every decision of the board shall be based upo~ findings of
fact and every finding of fact shall b~ supported in the
record of proceedings. The board may act only in matters
as specifically authorized by these regulations and these
regulations shall be construed as limitations on the power
of the board to act.
(b) Nothing herein contained shall be construed to empower the
board to change the terms of these regulations, or to effect
changes in the zoning districts. The powers of the board
shall be so applied that the terms of these regulations will
be strictly enforced.
(c) The concurring vote of four (4) members of the board shall
b~ necessary to reverse, on appeal, any order, requirement,
decision or determination of the Enforcing Officer, or to
grant any variance that the board is empowered to grant.
(d) A member shall disqualify himself from voting whenever he
has a personal or monetary interest in tbe property under
appeal, or will be directly affected by the decision of the
board. -
(e) A member may disqualify ,himself from voting whenever any
applicant, or his agent, has sought to influence the
member's vote on the appeal other than in the public
hearing.
/'
SECTION XIII. APPROVAL OF. REQUEST
.
(a) In approving any request, the board may designate such
conditions including time limits, if appropriate, in
connection therewith in order to secure substantially the
objectives of the regulation or provision to which such
variance is granted and to provide adequately for the
maintenance, of the integrity and character of the zone in
which such përmit is granted.
(b) When necessary the board may require guarantees, in such
form as it deems proper, to insure that conditions
designated in connection therewith are being or will be
complied with.
(c) Upon approval of an application for a variance appeal, the
applicant shall apply for occupancy or construction permits
within sixty (60) days after the ~oardts decision unless a
greater time is requested in the application and is author-
ized by the board. Any approval may be granted one
emergency extension of sixty (60) days on written request
filed with the board before expiration of the original
approval. Failure of the applicant to apply for occupancy _
of construction permits within the authorized time period
shall void the right to secure s~ch permits except upon the
filing of a new application or appeal.
SECTION XIV.
DENIAL OF REQUEST
.
No appeal 'or application that has'been denied shall-be furtber considered
by the board, unless the board ~ffirmatively finds:
(a) that new plans materially change the nature of tbe request,
or
(b) the permitted development of other nearby property in the
same zone has been substantially altered or changed by a
ruling of the board so as to support an allegation of
changed conditions.
. .
,
,
SECTION XV;
APp·EAL· OF BOARD ACTION
Any person or persons, jointly or' separately, or any taxpayer, or any
officer, department, or board of the city, aggrieved by any decision of
the Zoning Board of Adjustment may present to the appröpriate court of
record, a petition, duly verified, setting forth that such decision is
illegal, in whole or in part, specifying the grounds of such illegality.
Such petition shall be presented to the court within thirty (30) days after
the 'filing of the decision complained of in the offices of the board and not
thereafter.
Passed and approved this
day of
, 1983.
.
MaYOJ:
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
..
DATE: September 12 ~ 1983 II.¡··
.DBJECT :.
Ratification of Ordinance
DEP AATMEN'T :
Administration
BACKGROUND:
The ordinance is presently being prepared and will be distrihl1t~d
. \
~
....
.ø , t. at·..·the Council meeting.
/ .
/'
.
. '
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
,NO
N/A
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
. ;'
.
ORDINANCE NO.
,\~,
· tJ/
~
Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that:
1.
The application in PZ 83-25. heretofore approved by the Planning
and ~oning Commission be and is hereby approved subject to the regulations,
stipulations, and restrictions set out below.
2.
The land described in Exhibits
be and is hereby zoned multi-family planned development, subject to the
regulations, stipulations, and restrictions set out below.
.
3.
A specific use-go'lf course permit be and is hereby granted to
applicant for all portions of the land described in
which lies within the city limits of North Richland Hills, subject to
the regulations, stipulations, and restrictions set out below.
4.
Regulations, Stipulations, and Restrictions
.
This ordinance is being passed at the special instance and
request of applicant and the above permit and re-zoning is granted
conditioned upon the acceptance of these terms and adherence to these
terms by applicant, its heirs, successors, and assigns.
A. The funds required to build the left turn bridge (described in
the application) will be placed in escrow ~ith the city prior to any
building permit being issued for multi-family planned development.
The plan for the bridge must be accepted and approved by the Texas
Department of Highways before any building permit is issued for
multi-family planned development.
B. The condominiums called for in Phase III of the application shall
be 1000 square feet minimum.
c. A performance bond for construction of golf course (in the amount
of estimated cost) shall be furnished to the city prior to any building
permit being issued.
D. The completion of work on the lakes, described in the plans, will be
completed at applicant's cost and a performance bond shall b~ furnished
to the city prior to any bui'lding permit beíIig issued. The city will
not accept a dedication of any of the lakes and the city shall not maintain
the subject lake or lakes at any time in the future.
E. A six foot masonry fence will be built on the north line of the
> '
Page 2 - Ordinance No.
r-
, t
.
Texas Electric Service Company right-of-way abutting the apartments on
the south side. The first row of apartment bUildings north of the
Texas Electric Se~ice Company right-of-way shall be one story only.
F. Colonial Parkway shall be established as a one-way street (northbound)
from the Texas Electric Service Company right-af-way to Meadow Lakes
Drive.
G. Site plans on all tracts must be approved by the city council before
development begins.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1983.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
.
CITY SECRETARY
.
/ :;,-
\
t'
. ~
.
Ã'
,V
Br'sd L. Wilemon
M & W Investments
Robe,..t W. Mahoney
, '.
~
/'
, September 6, -1983
Mr. Roger Line
City ~nager
City,pf North Richland Hills
P.o. Box 18609
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Mr. Line,
On August 25, ·1983 our zoning case 'number PZ 83-54 was denied
due to a tied vote of 2-2.
.
We at this ·time request an appeal hearing at the earliest
possible date.
Thank yo~ for your time and consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
M & W INVESTMENTS
C. ¡¿,J ÆJ~
c. Kirk Nance
CKN:klb
.
M 8& W Adverti.ing, Inc. · M & W Development Co. · ExServ Co.
1211 South Bowen, Suite 212 · Arlington, Texas 76013 · 817/265-7095 ! 461-1600
DATE:
September 8) 1983
:¡
-
.
SUBJECT :.
.
Request of Kem Advertising for Billboard Sign Along Loop 820 'at Glenview
Drive
DEPARTMENT :
Public WOJ:ks
BACKGROUND:
Pertinent sections of the Sign Ordinance are attached for yonr revipw,
~. \ I
highlighteJ"for:~ase of reference. There is no specific prohibition a~ainst havin~
.,. . /. ~'. -.. .
"'a billbo~rd sign' on: the 'same property as a ground sign; ho,-,ever, .the provision is
written in such a way that it appears that the intent was to limit- the number of
signs to one.
City Council considera~ion and guidance 1S requested regarding this
request and for future similar situations.
.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove requested sign
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
ACCOill'IT ~ruMBER:
,/7¡1Œ··
------------------~--------1~~-- -~=~~-------------------~---------------------------
.
, "~j>' ~
.r
~ " r .~,:{;!
, .... . ~'
,,/
.
(b) Temporary Signs:
for temporary signs.
a single filing/permit fee of $10.00 shall be required
SECTION 3.10
IDENTIFICATION
Every 'sign or other advertising structure erected shall have painted on, or
otherwise permanently marked upon it a number assigned by the Building Department,
. which sþári ~e pot less than one (1) inch in height and shall be plainly visible from
the ground or from the roof adjacent to the sign.
ARTICLE 4
AREA OF SIGN PERMITTED
SECTION 4.1
SIGNS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
(a) For signing purposes, frontage on private streets that serve as public
thoroughfares and not just driveways may, with City Council approval, be considered
as qualified street frontage.
Cb) Anyone (1)šie'Ve1oPIDent may have a choi,ce of, but not more than, one
.. (1) . <¡r?.......un...........,..d...... .~..J...,.~..'..',. .....~.~"...on.,i.e"i~~'±~~...~.\ii......" ~,,:j~~ .~,; .;(,~;).p~Ç)jectin,9 sign.~,,:>.~'; excep
tions'eØtîta~ in Section".;;' ''3:~¡~{:..i~cåse iof'~"t{';î . ii#.,;;&t -
(e.g., shopping centers, apartment complexes, etc.) that have substantial frontages
on two or more' streets (with commercial or industrial zoning on both sides of the
tit streets), additional ground signs may be permitted with special approval from the
·City COW1cil.
SECTION 4.2
GROUND SIGNS
Ground signs are subject to the following provisions:
(a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each 300 linear feet
of qualified street frontage with each development in all zoning districts except AG,
l-F, 2-F and MF.
(b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be measured
as one (1) square foot of area of sign for each linear foot of street frontage, to
a maximum area of sign of 300 square feet for anyone sign.
(c) The maximum height. of any ground sign and its supporting structure
shall be twenty-five (25) feet, except that the height of a ground sign may be in-
creased by adding one (1) foot of height for each linear foot the sign is set back
from the adjacent property lines, not to exceed a maximum height of fifty (50) feet
to the top of the sign.
(d) The height of any gro~~d sign may not exceed one-half (,) the shortest
linea.r distance from the location of the sign to the nearest boundary of any AG, l-F,
2-F, or MF zoning district.
.
{f'.~.'.- ..,.....
\ "
'-...;
6i.
.
KEM ADVERTISING. INC..:!263 Ei~~.th .A:.·cnue. Fort Wont\. "exas 76"0 (81~ 9:'·5521
'..
Outdoor Advertising Specialists
August 11, 1983
'1"
/'
Mr. Rodger Line
City Manager
City Of North Richland Hills
P.o. Box 18609
North -Kichland Hills, Texas 76118
D ear ~1 r. L i n e ,
We would like to request to be on the agenda for the August 22,
1983 meeting of the North Richland Hills City Council.
The purpose of our appearance is to seek issuance of a permit
for a billboard sign located .at the cornet: of Glenview and N.E.
Loop 820 currently occupied by Pearl Vision Center.
Thank you for your consideration.
, ~
, \
, ~. "
CO........c RC&AL
. ~-., lit E A L £ S TAT E
\~~-. '
..
ere
!.
BRADLEY G:' HARRISON
ðtð AOAIltING SP~INGS ROA.D
817-'32-:;813
. 817·732·S~IO
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76..4
August 10, 1983
. \
. , t.
/'
Mr. J i mm y E. Dan; e 1
KEM Advertising, Inc.
2263 Eighth Avenue
Fort Worth~ Texas 76110
Re: Billboard Sign.
I - 820 & Glenview
N. Richland Hills, Texas
Dea r Jimmy:
This will serve. to confirm our conversation concerning
the subject pro'perty and your desire to erect a bill-
board sign. Please consider this your authority to make
application for a building permit and take any other
action on my behalf to secur~ such permit.
If you, or the City of N. Richland Hills, require any
further authority or information please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
BGH/mbh
r
.
C I 'r \ý 0 ¡:.- f\1 () R 'r H F~ I C f-.¡ L i~-i t\l D 1-1 I L..I.... S
C: I -r'Y C:fJlJN(~ I L
AIJGLJST 2:;~ It 1 98:~;
.
PROPOSAL FOR BILLBOARD
BY'
KEM ADVERTISING~ INC.
.
.
.
,9
.,~ .,
~..ð f~. «
/'
~
,
~
;.. 0
N
h
p¿r~~(,.
I ,
,~
I
r
_.~'. ;-...w-...... ..........
GL £#V/Ev/ DAZ·/Þ'¿:·
~(
"'"~-i
~-:-".".."!SI ,,·~N""'~".·
"'*'<'..........~
.~.,..........."....-~~
.
.
COMMERCIAL
REAL ESTATE
.
.
BRADLEY G. HARRISON
616 ROARING SPRINGS ROAD
817-732-3813
817-732-5510
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76114
August 10, 1983
Mr. Jimmy E. Daniel
KEM Advertising, Inc.
2263 Eighth Avenue
Fort Worth, Texas 76110
Re: Billboard Sign
I - 820 & Glenview
N. Richland Hills, Texas
Dear Jimmy:
This will serve to confirm our conversation concerning
the subject pro'perty and your desire to erect a bill-
board sign. Please consider this your authority to make
application for a building permit and take any other
action on my behalf to secure such permit.
If you, or the City of N. Richland Hills, require any
further authority or information please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
BGH/mbh
.
Stembridge & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
August 15, 1983
Mr. Bill Rice
Building Official
City of"~~orth_Richland Hills
7 30 IN~'~"~'~'Lo6p "820
North Richland Hills, Texas
Dear S.~r;:
Wea;re,p:r.esently in the process of prepar1n$\8 platf~~:;,/the .{>r'oper~y
loca~ed'"atthenorthea"st of corner of Glenv'1ew Ct. and:;~f~Glenv1.ewDr1.ve.
.
We are platting t~e {>roperty. for Mr. BradG..HarrisoIl;~~?rthepurpose
of obtaining a bU1.1d1.ng perm1.t for theplirp.o:~~.9£ ~:ar:~~1.ng.aJ'>1..11board.
~;sli~~~~i~ ~:rl~u~stions concerning thisma~:fer, rJi~~~~>donot
Sincere"ly,
"-
~
.~
DRSlbb
.
Ji! ~
DATE:
September 8, 1983
~':.~
~~)
17
..
fÎUBJECT:. ,
Request of Mobil Oil ,Corporation for variance from Sign' Ordinance
DEP ARTMEl\"T :
Pub}ic, Works
:,The applicant has requested three pole signs; one is.a pricing s1gn and
BACKGROUND:
the other'~~~' ar~·:·Mobi1 signs.' The sign ordinance allo'-'s only on~ pole' sign" on this
~... //'
property. Thr~ugh inadve~tence, the applicant '-'as improperly given a set of plans sho,-,-
ing all three signs as being approved~ Accordingly, 'the applicant proceeded to erect
the poles, and they are in place. The applicant was told p-r..~or to erecting 'the signs
that permits '-'ere required, but he proceeded ,-,ith erecting the poles ,-,ithoût.permits.
.
. '
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove the requested variance.'
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
ACCOUNT ~'1.JMBER:
. ;:Jß¡4 ~~___________________~____________________-_-__-_
------------------------------~~~~
.
.
.
.
-.t ,..
Mobil Oil Corporation
. t.
"'"
/'
City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
Dear Sir:
P.O. BOX 222225
DALLAS. TEXAS 75222
ENGINEERING CENTER
September 2, 1983
RE: Mobil Service Station
5036 Rufe Snow Drive
North Richland Hills, TX
Permission is requested to be placed on the agenda of the
September 12, 1983 City Council Meeting to request a variance
to ordinance no. 1001 of the North Richland Hills Building Code.
This request is to allow the installation of Mobil identification
and price signage at subject location.
If you should have any questions concerning this, please call
the undersigned at (214) 658- 9.
HDS/bjh
September 8,
1983 ;/3
DATE:
.UBJECT :.
Proposed Contract for Architectural Services - Komatsu & A~~nr;~tøc
DEPARTMENT :
Admin~st~ation
As, autho~ized by the City Council at its May 23rd meeting, a proposed
BACKGROUND:
con t.~ac t l'Ca.!i;.·.bee~··:'negotia ted· with Komatsu & Associates to prov'ide pre li~inarŸ feasibility
,',r
. .
.,...
studies and ,cos.t estimates for the following building facility needs:
A. Police Department
B. Public Works Service Center
c. Animal Control Center
Details of the propo~~d study are outlined 1n the attachment:
The Komatsu firm was selected following a thorough review by a Staff
Committee of proposals from seven firmS.
The cost 1S well within the preliminary estimate.
.
. .
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve the proposed contract with Komatsù & Associates.
in the amount of $12,000.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES X
'NO -
ACCOU1\'r1' NUMBER:
15-00-00-4800
. ----- ~-ij~~ ~~-------------------~--------------------------
---------------------- -L~ ~ ~~
.
.
.
.
KOMATSU
ALBERT S. KOMATSU &: ASSOCIATES
August 19, 1983
....
Mr. Rodger N. Line
City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
P. o. Bpx 18609
. Nortþ' R¡c~l~.nd ,Hills, TX 76118
Dear Rodger:
Re: Feasibility Study for
Expansion of Municipat Facilities
We have enclosed a proposal giving the scope of our services in preparation of a
feasibility study for the City of North Richland Hills. This study will contain
an analysis of the available options and will include single line schematic
floor plan drawings to illustrate the various possibilities. Also included will
be site plan studies at the different locations and a preliminary cost estimate.
We will further enclose a letter presenting our recommended selection of a
course to follow.
The final product of our studies will be in 8i x 11 format. For this work we
request a fee of $12,000.00 which will include furnishing 20 copies of the study
at no additional cost to you. If at a later date we are selected to prepare
design and construction documents, we will credit one-half ($6,000.00) of this
amount against our fee for preparation .of these documents.
Time required for preparation of the feasibility study is estimated to be eight
weeks from'date of Notice to Proceed. We have enjoyed working with the City of
North Richland Hills in development of your present municipa1 building and look
forward hopefully to working with you again.
Sincerely,
~//(~
Albert S. Komatsu, AlA
ASK/djr
Enclosure
\HC ITE(T~' E\(;I\EEH~ 'l\lFHI(/H I'F~I<,\LH~
lüJ2 ~l \1\11T \ \E\L E· ~llTt 2(H)' 1',( /, H< 1\ ]( -;-u
FURT \"OHTH, TE\,-\~ 7()I02' HI7 :n2' (Þ]1 . \H:TI-:()~29·-;-,t-{.:i
.
.
.
KOMATSU
ALBERT S. KOMATSU & ASSOCIATES
August 19, 1983
Rodger N. Line, City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
.
,
PROPOSAL TO PREPARE A FEASIBILITY STUDY
FOR EXPANSION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TEXAS
/'
1. EXPANSION OF POLICE DEPARTMENT.
2. NEW PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SERVICE CENTER.
3. NEW ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER.
1. POLICE DEPARTMENT
A. Masterplan requirements of police facilities to meet the needs of the City
when fully developed. The City will furnish projections showing ultimate
personnel requirements from studies by others.
B.
Consider possibility of incremental expansion of master plan as funding
becomes available.
C. Study alternate locations for the- expansion:
(1) Add on and extend the existing police wing to the west by relocating
park ing area.
(2) Build new facility to west of present municipal building on land that
is part of the present site.
(3) Consider offsite locations if appropriate.
2. PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE CENTER
A. Masterplan new (and·existing) facilities for fully developed City. The
City will furnish projections showing ultimate personnel and equipment
requirements.
B. Consider possibilities of incremental expansion.
c. Study location proposed plus possible alternate sites.
(1) Acquisition of additional land adjacent to existing water and sewer
service departments.
(2) Consider alternate sites (if any).
-\HCH ITEeT:-- . r: \CI \ I·T H~ . I \TF K IOK 11E~1(, \ VB:--
]()I:2 ~r\1\11T \\ E\l E· 'liTE :200· P,t), BU\ 2071/
FURT WURTH. T[\-\~ 7{d02' HI 7f:'ß2·]()]4· \tFTH( 1~:2q'7 t{d
l) ,..
.
~
.
.
Rodger N. Line, City Manager
August 19, 1983
Page 2
3. ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER
A. Masterp'lan requirements to meet needs of fully developed City.
B. ø. Cònsidér incremental expansion.
/'
C. Study location north of Loop 820 and west of railroad, east of Fossil Creek
on high land owned by City.
)~ (
DATE:
September 12, 1983
~t1BJECT :
.
Increase in Warrant Fees
DEP Þu~TMENT :
Administration
BACt~G~OUND :
Thi~ ordinance is in accordance with the SB 1034 adoDted bv the Texas
...
St~te Léqislature. This law amends Article 45.06, Code of Criminal Procedure,
/' , -'
to increase, f~om ?7.50 to $25, the maximum permissible amount of the charqe
for the issuance and service of an arrest warrant. Also adds new lanquaqe
to Article 45.06 authorizinq the Ci tv to establish ·wå'rrant charqes ·of UP to
$25 for offenses under Section 38.11, Penal. Code (failure ·to appear),and
Article 6701d, V.T.C.S. (traffic-related violations}.
-----------~----
- -
.-
-'-
-...
"
-~
:.;
-----..- .... ._- ----..--.- .-....-......-.....- ------- ...~.-.-.-..
~
CI1Y rOUNCIL ACTION REQU:RED:
Approve/Disapprove ordinance
- ..-.. ._._-_.._------------------_..-_._-~ -----
2,U U:JETED IT~){:
YES
N/A
N.O N/A
/·~CC()1J!'rr 1'HJMBER: N/A
. (~) .
---------------------~-----------------------------------------~-~~l~~--------
.
, . . ~., t-":~ .....:
...... ...
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO.
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that:
1.
~
, t.
/' ~Th~ charge for issuance and serving of an arrest warrant by the
Municipal Court of the City shall be Twenty-Five Dollars ($25.00) for the
offenses including "failure to appear" and "traffic related violations".
2.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after
the date of passage.
Passed and approved this
day of
,1983.
~ayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
. '. J·"..r
'1~~ "I
..
DATE:
September 12, 1983
.TBJECT: .
Increase in Municipal Court Fines
:JEP Þ.-RTMENT :
Administration
BACKGROUND:
This. ordinance is in accordance with SB 856 recently passed by the
...
~ex~s Ståte Legislature and authorizes cities to increase permissible
/'
Munic·ipal Court fines. This law amends Article 1011 and. 1195, R.C.S., and
Article 4.14, Code of Criminal Procedure, to increase the "amount of the
'maximum permissible fine that may be imposed by the Municipal Court for
certain offenses. For violations of municipal ordi~ances .that gove~ fire
safety, zoning, and public .health and sanitation (not including vegetation
"
and ~itter violations), the maximum permissible fine is $1,000. For traffic-
~..........---------.~..-
related offenses and other violations, the maximum permissible fine will
.
continue to be ~200. Examples of offenses fOr which a fine of up to $1,000
-
may be imposed include violations of municip~ zoning ordinances; orqinances
--.
regulating the loeatj.on of mobile homes; smo~ detector, sprinkler, fjre
~
. ...-.-......-. ... -~ -- --..--.-.. ...- _.~----~-- ...
zone and fireworks ordinances; ordinances regulating massage parlors, noise-
related nuisances and the discharge of firearms; animal control ordinances;
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove ordinance
---.. ~.._.._---~._.----------_..._..._. -.....----.--.-
3U iJGETt~D ITEM:
YES
N/A
NO- N/A
~::::::_:~~::~--~-----~~~~-----------~--------------(}-~~~----------------------
.
'. ~. t~' _
.
.
.
~
~
taxicab and utility franchises; ordinances applicable to the City waterworks
or sewerage system; ordinances regulating curb cuts and street obstructions;
and munic'ipal fire, building, electrical, plumbing and other construction
~odês. Note: S.B. 856 is not self-enacting - that is, it does not automati-
/'
cally increase the amount of the fine prescribed in any existing City
ordinance. In order to take advantage of the higher fines allowed under
the measure, the City Council must amend each existing ordinance accordingly.
,.
"\
.
ORDINANCE NO.
. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland~ Hills, Texas, that:
ø . , t. .
..
/'
1.
Violation of the provisions of any of the following ordinance of
this City shall carry a penalty of a fine up to, but not in excess of,
$1,000.00: Ordinance No. 151 (Regulating Message Parlors), Ordinance No.
195 (Regulating Curb Cuts), Ordinance No. 381 (City Waterworks and
Sewer System), Ordinance No. 794 (Firearms and Fireworks Control) and
Ordinance No. 1024 (Animal Control Ordinance).
2.
The Municipal Court of this City is hereby empowered to impose fines
up to but not exceeding $1,000.00 for all offenses. where such fine is
permitted by the Statutes of the State of T.exas.
3.
. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after passage
and publication.
day of
PASSED AND APPROVED this the
1983.
APPROVED:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
.
DATE:
September 8) 1983
~::L
.UBJECT.
Resolution on Jail Standards.
DEPARTMENT :
Polic.e
BACKGROUND:
The ,68th· Legislature appointed the Texas Jail Standards Cormnittee to
formulate Rùles '. and Regulati~ns programs and guidelines for all Municipal jails.
.. ;'
This èommittee is to bring to the 69th Legislature it's findings, so that these
"standards" can be imposed on all municipal ;ails in this state. 'The attached
resolution opposes this imposition and requests that the TML formallv oDpose
any such intrusion in Ho~e Rule Cities.
.
CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED:
Request passage of Resolution #83-
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
---~--~~~--~-~----~-~----~~~~~~~~-~~~---~-~-~--~-~~-~-~~-
~
.
.
~
.
.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
RESOLUTION NO. 83-
WHEREAS, the 68th Legislature of the State of Texas has passed
House Concurrent Resolution Number 247 directing the Texas Commission on
Jail Standårds to conduct a survey of municipal jails; and
. \
.
· WHEREAS, the 68th Legislature of the State of Texas has directed
t(e Jaíl Standards Commission to promulgate rules establishing programs of
rehabilitation, education, and recreation in municipal jails; and
WHEREAS, the 68th Legislature of the State of Texas has directed
the Texas Commission on Jail Standards. to promulgate rules for the con-
struction, equipment maintenance, operation of municipal jails; and
WHEREAS, the 68th Legislature has directed the Texas Commission
on Jail Standards to furnish to the 69th Legislature copies of its find-
ings; and
WHEREAS, this intrusion of the State of Texas into the domain of
Home Rule cities is an unwanted, unwarranted and unneeded usurpation of the
right to self government of the citizens of this municipality and such
intrusion must have the direct effect of increasing the operating costs of
local government; therefore
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of North Richland Hills that
this governing body be shown as opposing such imposition of State Rules and
Regulation on this City, thereby eroding local self government; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution be transmitted to
the State Representative~,and Senators representing this area, and to
the Delegates of the Texas Municipal League meeting in Houston for the
71st Annual Conference; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this elected body, requests that
these assembled delegates and State Legislators unanimously oppose this
and all other such incroachment by the State Legislature into the daily
operating affairs of local government.
Passed and approved the
day of
) 1983.
Dick 'Fararn - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
. .
¡T'
-~
. .
DATE:
8-24-83
-'
~
, .
._"A
. ,
'"
." _.
...
.'
eBJECT :.
., .
Pay Estimate #6 - Holiday North Street and Drainage Imurovement~
..
. If
. .
-
DEP ARTMEtrr :
Public ~orks
BACKGROUND:
This project is 80% completed as of Lhis estimate.
..... -
. .
. .
-
~
. .
. .
. .
. .
.
-
-
..
-- ,;.
-
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve/disapprove pay estimate in the amount of $33,897.33
to Stolaruk Corporation.
BUDGETED ITEM :
YES X
NO
......
ACCOUNT NLJMBER:
------------------~------------------------------------------~~~-----------------
General Obligation Bonds
.
.
.
.
~
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
Augus t 16, 1983
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-328, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS,
CONTRACTOR1S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.6
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.6, dated
August 16, 1983, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation, in the amount of
$33,897.33, for materials furnished and work performed on-the referenced
pr9ject as of July 31, 1983.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your
representatives, Bill Rutledge and Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on
the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend, that this payment, in amount of $33,ag,.7·.33, be m'ade-- to Sto1a-ru'k
Corporation at P. O. Box 61587, Dallas, Texas 75261.
-
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank
estimate fOnTl for preparing next month's estimate.
RWA/l jc
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Linet City Manager
Mr. Ronald T. Jonest Stolaruk Corp.
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Hr. Bill Rutledge, City Inspector
Mr. Floyd '~cCallum, City Inspector
Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
?Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Publ;cWorks
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
-, ...
~.- -
, '
~. :. "__4" ..
DATE:
9-6-83
;;J
.,. .,'
. .... ',: .
~~.......- ~...
. ,4 . ...: .' ..,.,: ..
.. ..-
_ .... IL
:
. .B.JECT:. .
Partial Pay Estimate #i - Davis Blvd. Z.O MG Elevated Storage Tank
DEP ARTMENT :
U~ility
BACKGROUND:
Contractor "has used 62% of'allotted time and the proiect~is 88% complete.
. \'
, ..
..,.
,~
:
..
CIn COUNCIL AC'FION REQUIRED:
Approve/disapprove payment to Universal Tank & Iron Works
.'. .
Inc., in the amount of $50,544.00
BUDGETED ITEM: .
YES X
NO
:CCOUh~_::~::~___~~:::::_:::~_______________________________~~~~~~________
..
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
...
S~ptem5e~~2, 1983
/
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North R;chland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-540, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
DAVIS BLVD. 2.0 M.G. ELEVATEU STORAGE TANK,
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.7
.
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.7, dated
August 31, 1983, made payable to Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc., in the
amount of $50,544.00, for materials furnished and work performed on the
referenced project as of August 31, 1983.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your
representative, Bill Rutledge, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and
we have· ch,ecked· the item ex·tens,i·ons- andadditi.ons,.
We reconvnend that this payment in amount".of $50,544.00, be made to Univers-al
Tank & Iron Works, Inc., P.O. Box 31156, Indianapolis, Indiana 46231.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate fonn for preparing next month's estiJnate.
~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Ronald J. Scott, Universal Tank & Iron
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Bill Rutledge, City Inspector
Mrs. Lou Spi ege 1
/Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267"3367
-.;.:-... ~~..~...
-.,. ~ -.
. .
-~.....': ....... . .
...... ... ."-
,,!........:"" .. .,..
.~;";~~.=. ~:.·;.:·Io . . .
. . ...... -- ... .... ~ ---' -.. - .
--_. ...... ..
DATE:
9-6-83
'"--:
. _ r',
- SUBJECT:.'
.. .
, '
Partial Pay Estimate ·fl3·:~-~"R~fe Snow Drive, Phase II
:
DEP ARTMENT :
P11h;; r tJh,..1tc
:BACKGROUND:
Contractor has used 33%· of 'allotted ,ti1ne and' pro; e,ct is' 37%' complete.
""'
/'
:
.
CITY COUNCIL Aq'ION REQUIRED:
Approve/disapprove payment to Austin Road Co.. in the
amount of $350~051.61
BUDGETED ITEM: '
YES X
NO
ACCOUNT ~~ER: General Obligation Bonds
------------------~--------------------------------------------~~~~~~--------
.
./
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
ø .
.. Spetemþer· 2, 1983
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-218, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RUFE SNOW DRIVE, PHASE II,
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.3
.
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.3, dated
August 30, 1983, made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of
$350,051.61, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of August 31, 1983.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your
representative, Floyd McCall urn, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and
we have checked the item extensions and addftions.
We recommend that this payment in amount ·of $350,051.61, be made to Austin Road
Co. at P.O. ~ox 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road-
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mrs. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
~ Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METR0/267-3367
..~:.~.... ~..
- :_~~:~~.. '.~ .'.
. .....
. . .;,....;.. : - .. . . "
. ~:.. ....~ . .
.iÊr~_<~ ....
.... ~......" .
DATE:
9-6-83
. . '"
-. - SUBJECT::
...
,
~ . .. ..
Partial Pay Estimate 1/7 ~C:-~'Sri0w Heights· 'Street & Draina'ge" Improvements
DEP ARTMENT :
Public Works
BACKGROUND:
Contractor has used 58% of allotted time and project is~83% complete.
. ~
....
/'
~
.
CITY COUNCIL AC!ION REQUIRED:
amount of $lû4,587.78
Approve/disapprove payment to Austin Road ·Co., in the'
", .
BUDGETED ITEM: .
YES
x
NO
ACCOUNT ~LrnŒER: General Obligation Bonds
------------------~----------------------------------------~~~~~~~ ---------
.
/-
.
K NOWL TO N-E NG LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
September 2, 1~83
ø . I to
~ Honorab1 e Mayo·r and Ci ty Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-326, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
SNOW HEIGHTS STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS~
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.7
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.7, dated
August 30, 1983, made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of $104,587.78,
far materials furnished and work perfonmed on the referenced project as of
August 31, 1983.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your
representative, Floyd McCallum~ as indicated by signature on the estimate, and
we have checked the item extensions and additions.
.
We recommend that this payment in amount of $104,587.78, be made to Austin Road
Co. at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas -.76113.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mrs. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance
~Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
DATE,~
J
Sept. 12, 19.83
67
SUBJECT:, Public Hearing - Proposed 1983-84 O'Deratin2 Bndg~t
.
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: The City Mana~er pre~pntPn t'hp ,qRi-R¿ 'h"rlgø't- ~t tr~ AngnRt ??no
meeting~' Ma~9r Faram will open the public hearing and call for any interested
# ,
~ citizen/wishing' tö speak.
.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
--~~~--~--~~-~------~--~---~~~--~--~-~~-~~-~~~~--~-~~~~~----~~--~-~---~~------~-----~~~~-~~
.
t '
DATE: September 12. ,1983
.SUBJECT :.
Ordinance Adopting Budget
DEPARTMENT:
Administr::trinn
BACKGROUND:
Copies of the ordinance will be distrjb11tPt1 ,qr r'hp rn1'l"~;'
""
...
. \
mee ting it, '~'inai~'" figures are known.
- /'
/
.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
.NO
N/A
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
..ø' Á ,",,, j
---------------------------------------------------------------~--~~-~~:_-~--------
.
).
.
ORDINANCE NUMBER (û1)"Q
AN ,ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND APPROVING A BUDGET FOR THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER 1ST, 1983 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1984
. , to
...
/
WHEREAS, an annual operating budget for the fiscal year October 1, 1983
through September 30, 1984, has been prepared by the City Manager for the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, and
WHEREAS, said budget has been presented by the City Manager in
accordance with the City Charter, and
WHEREAS, public notices of a public hearing upon this budget hearing
has been held on said budget, and it is the consensus of opinion that the budget,
as submitted and amended, should be approved, to wit:
RECOMMENDED
BUDGET
AMENDED AND ADOPTED·
BUDGET
.
GENERAL FUND
TOTAL REVENUE
EXPENDITURES:
Ci ty Council
City Manager
Finance
City Secretary
Civil Service
Legal
Municipal Court
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Police
Fire
Library
Non-Departmental
EXPENDITURES TOTAL
DEBT SERVICE FUND
. TOTAL REVENUE
TOT Þ.:L EXPENDITURES
.
.
.
Page Two
UTILITY FUND
TOTAL REVENUE
EXPENDITURES: .
Public Work
... ~nance..
Non- Departmental
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
PARK AND LIBRARY FUND
TOTAL REVENUE
EXPENDITURES:
Park
Library
TOTAL EXPENDITU~ES
PROMOTIONAL FUND
TOTAL REVENUE
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
RECOMMENDED
BUDGET
AMENDED AND ADOPTED .
BUDGET
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills ratify, adopt and approve the budget as filed and amended for the
fiscal year beginning October 1, 1983, through September 30, 1984. .
PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City Council at a special
meeting in the Council Chamber of the North Richland Hills City Hall on the
day of , 1983.
ATTEST:
Ci ty Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORlVl AND LEGALITY:
Ci ty Attorney
Mayor
DATE:
..-.
c/.
September 1'., lQR1'
, SUBJECT:
. .
Ordinance Setting the Tax Rate
DEPARTMENT:
Administration
BACKGROUND:
This 'ordinance will set the tax rate at $0.50 per $lnO ,nn 'u~l11~t-;ot'l
. \
,
,
/' ~.
~
...
/
.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
N/A
ACCOU1IT NUMBER:
------------------~--------------------------------------------~---~~--~¡~------
.
.
.
.
... '"""" ... .-.,_ ~ .... - . _ -~ ~ '-._ - .__ ~.,. J ... ~ _.._..._ _'. r" .-...... - __..... ~ . '~:. _ .....,"\. ,",,_..'
c·
(
11)
ORDINANCE NUMBER rO ~
, , t,
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF AN
AD VALOREM TAX ON PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN THE CORPORATE
LIMITS OF'THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, ON THE
FI~ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1983, EXCEPT SUCH PROPERTY AS MAY BE
EXÉMPT FROM TAXATION BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE STATUTES
OF: THE STATE OF TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A DELINQUENT DATE; AND
SETTING THE RATE OF PENALTY AND INTEREST AND PRESCRIBING
ATTORNEY'S FEES TO BE COLLECTED ON DELINQUENT TAXES;
DECLARING A FIRST AND PRIOR AND SUPERIOR LIEN ON ALL REAL
PERSONAL PROPERTY AS OF JANUARY 1ST, 1983, TO SECURE
PAYME~T; ORDAINING OTHER MATTERS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
...
/
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
That there is hereby levied and shall þe collected as provided by law an
ad valorem tax for the year 1983 on all property, real and personal, except such
property as may be exempt from taxation by the Constitution and the statutes of
the State of Texas, situated within the corporate limits of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas on January 1, 1983, and that the amount to be applied to the
value of such property shall be $0.50 per $100.00 valuation.
2.
That the tax so levied and assessed shall be apportioned to the following
accounts and funds in the amount set forth:
General Fund:
Debt Service Fund:
$0.28
$0.22
Collections of taxes levied shall be deposited to the credit of each of the above
accounts and funds in their proportionate share of the total levy and after taking
into consideration a three percent (3%) uncollectable factor which is to be accounted
for in the General Fund.
. '
3.
That the taxes provided for herein are in accordance with the appropriate
State statutes.
4.
Ad valorem taxes levied by this Ordinance shall be due and payable on
October 1, 1983, and shall become delinquent on the first day of February, 1984.
Payment of such tax is due in one full installment.
,'" t ...
ORDINANCE NO.
Page 2
.
5.
.
If the tax is unpaid after February 1, 1984, such tax will become
delinquent and penalty and interest will attach and accrue as provided by the
Statutes of the State of Texas including Articles 1060a and 7336, V.A.T.C.S.
6.
In the event the taxes become delinquent and in the event such
delinq-µeI:1t tå~es are referred to an attorney for collection, an additional amount of
fifteeppe:r:ceI:lt (15%) of the total amount of tax, penalty and interest then due shall
be added as 'collection costs and paid by the taxpayer.
..
7.
Taxes herein levied and uncollected shall be a first, prior and superior
lien against the property, and the said lien shall be superior liens, charges, and
encumbrances, and such lien shall attach to personal property with the same
priority as to real property.
8.
The lien provided herein shall be attached as of January 1, 1983.
9.
.
Should any section provision or clause of this Ordinance be declared by a
court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity
of this Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to
be invalid.
10.
This Ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its
approval and adoption as provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, upon first and final reading, at a regular meeting on the
day of , 1983.
Mayor
, .
ATTEST:
Ci ty Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
.
City Attorney
DATE:
September 12 ~ 1983
.SUBJECT :.
R~vpn11P ~'h;::¡r; 11f: "R,;i1gør
DEPARTMENT:
Administration
BACKGROUND:
As reauired by law. a pnh 1 ; ~ 'hP~ r;n e 'tJ:;:¡ ~ 'J,ø 1 i1 ("\11 A" 8,,·ct at'h
'. .
'"' ana Aug}ist 22nd.
.
CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED:
Aprro'ue /Di» øppro"tTQ
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
'NO -
N/A
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
~-~~--~~~-~~--~--~-~~--~----~~~-~~-~---~~-~~~--~-~~-~~~~-~-~~~~---~~--~-~~~--~~-~~-~~-~----
,.
\. .
't '&-
DATE:
September 12~ 19R1
SUBJECT:
. .
PO~T ~OTTNrTT. T"'FM~
DEP ARTMENT :
/
k~ .ì!,k,",·, ~.>'¡ ",,-
i'~ ,^ í ¿";-~
, "L '''':'-'''v',~..4.. ,..--t4'",,,
BACKGROUND:
I[~ ~_~;Z. <;i pct!...
....
/
.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
ACCOUNT NUMB.ER:
----~-~~--~~-~-~-~-~~--~~--~-~-~---~~~-~~~-~-~-~--~---~~--~~~~-~-~--~--~---~---~---~~--~-~~
.
.
~
.
.
\0 ,.,
City of ~orth ~ch1and WIls
, 11\ '
·~¡r
-- I, ~tar .fthe~etr.plex
September 6~ 1983
Ref: CSM:0028-83
. , '.
/
Memo to: Rodger N. Line, City Manager
From: Ron McKinney, Personnel Director
Subject: Expiration of Civil Service Commissioners' Terms of Office
The following Civil Service Commissioners' terms of office have expired
or will expire as indicated below:
Commissioner
Date Appointed
Term of
Office Expiration Date
10/1/81
10/1/81
11/23/81
1 yr.
1 yr.
2 yrs.
10/1/82) (' l/.,~LL -i
1 0/1/82 ~V'--uJ2 (j
10/1/83// ~
Bob Roa r'k
Dave Phelps
George Pederson
(Completed Dave Casey's term)
Jeff Newsom, Jr.
r(completed Bob Skelton's term)
(~(j Sz., v (
I request that the filling of these four offices be placed for consideration
on the 'City Council Agenda of September 12, 1983.
6/27/83
2 yrs.
1 0/1 /83
~KinneY
(817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 I NORTH RICHlAND HilLS, TEXAS 76118
... ...
.
..
.
.
City of ~orth ~chland Hills
Star of the ~etroplex
TO: City Çouncil Members
REF: PWM-0032-83
FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works
DATE: July 18~ 1983
/'
$UBJECT: The Building Code and Abatement Board of Appeals
and the Zoning Board of Adjustments
We are still in need of five names for the Building and
Abatement Code Board of Appeals and in addition, two
names for alternate. We do not have any cases for this
Board at the present time but we are beginning to send
out notices to people concerning their dangerous structures.
We are also in need of two alternates for the Zoning
Board of Adjustments. The last meeting of the Zoning
Board of Adjustments was postponed because of lack of
quorum. Since we have appointed Mr. Kossler to that
Board, we no longer have any alternates.
We need a total of nine good people to serve on these
Boards as regular members or alternates.
'. t-L4/-~~ 4< éJ æl ¿) ~_~ .
~ . ---~(
( D~~)
Cft~
-r~/!/L. 6-c,-<'0~7" (/?~~~) /2~~J)
/
0cj-£~~ L¿A,~~{ ( j)~:ß. 7 ~~j
f)~ /?~~~ (/~.~)
(/?~)
S','ILUJr:J- (k~~)
~
(¿J2~
/21 ~. ¡) to_ ~/ - '1
~J
...-
b .~ß~ð l/~ ¿l(jc~ .h jJ~~dz ¡- ~
v
(817) 281-0041 /7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118