The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1983-09-26 Agendas . . -CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North 'Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers) 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on September 26. 1983 . ", ,..->.'# NU}{8ER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *1. Executive Session - Discussion of Personnel (Board Auuointments), Liti~ation and _Land/or Land'Matters - *Closed as Drovi decì hv tnp OnpT1 MPÆ~t;T10~TL~L7 ..... - - I f I I I i u----J- r I i I ¡ -1 I I- i ,'" ¡ ¡ I --,--- -.....,..- I ~.. ... ----.--L e-- - _._._-~ - -- -__J. i I -+- ¡ ¡ - '-;'~~'~-,,~;,.¡._........_-- . .. . '--"--.-'; ............--.........~..a& ....................... . _._,,_ .'... _ ...:__~. "':":'_"'~,_"'''''''.""l'_",~,_",,,,_ .... ...; _ ........, _ '" '._"'0___ .:-.......... -o...h ..: City of ~orth WcWand Hills Star of the ~etroplex TO: City Council Members REF: PWM-0032-83 FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works DATE: July 18, 1983 SUBJECT: The Building Code and Abatement Board of Appeals and the Zoning Board of Adjustments We are still in need of five names for the Building and Abatement Code Board.of Appeals and in addition, two names for alternate. We do not have any cases for this Board at the present time but we are beginning to send out notices to people concerning their dangerous structures. We are also in need of two alternates for the Zoning Board of Adjustments. The last meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustments was postponed because of lack of quorum. Since we have appointed Mr. Kassler to that Board, we no longer have any alternates. We need a total of nine good people to serve on these Boards as regular members or alternates. k (817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76118 . . . , ..... -. - .-.-, ,,' .- þ" Yo ~c ""'-~~"-_'lL4_4!/· - ::; .-, .....or.¡:,,' ,_ '" ... "._-...;.__ Su&gested Members for Board of Abatement of Dangerous Buildings Joe Coulson Orville Baker Gerald Stewart John Larriviere Timothy J. Crowley (Profile Sheet Attached) Council contact person - Mayor Faram Council contact person - Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey Council contact person - Councilman Fisher Council contact person - Councilman Davis ,......_,-~;..:._........~--_......~._ .. _..." __;-_'. ......eo:. . .. . ....." '-,' . ._.~. ...:::. ~""_':~- _.~..... ..... ~ .....,..~.1__~.~... ......1-....._......._... ..._-........: ~ ....:._ " City of ~orth WcWand Hills Star of the ~etroplex September 6. 1983 Ref: CSM:0028-83 Memo to: Rodger N. Line, City Manager From: Ron McKinney, Personnel Director Subject: Expiration of Civil Serv;ceCommiss;oners' Terms of Office The following Civil Service Commissioners' terms of office have expired or will expire as indicated below: Term of Commissioner Date Appointed Office Expiration Date Bo b Roa r'k 1 0/1/81 1 yr. 1 0/1 /82 Dave Phelps 1 0/1 /81 1 yr. 10/1/82 George Pederson 11/23/81 2 yrs. 10/1/83 (Completed Dave Casey's term) Jeff Newsom, Jr. 6/27/83 2 yrs. 10/1/83 (completed Bob Skelton's term) I request that the filling of these four offices be placed for consideration on the 'City Council Agenda of September 12, 1983. ~KinneY (817) 281-0041 /7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 · ·CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on September 26, 1983 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 6:30 P.M. * Sèssion to Discuss Personnel ,(Board Appointments), Litigation and/or Land Matters ssion of Reconsideration of Mobil ·ance from the Si Ordinance of Seed Limit on Brile and Lariat Ma or Pro Tern Jim Ramsey) Discussion 'of Emer enc Ambulance Service {Chief Gertz) I .~-- for Morgan Meadows I I ~-_.-+--I--_. ' ,./ ¡ .. .1 ! ~ussion of Ordinance Amending t . .------~_JS-Q.... 381, Water Billing Change - ------J. (Ag.endq Item 112:31-.___ ___ 8. Discussion of October 10, 1983 Council I I Discussion of Contract : Drainage Improvements ~ ~~~nda Item 1/19 ---~ Discussion of PS-83-14.~lS..equest of Aubrey: I .. J Brothers for Final_'Plat-F1s.rningo Estates F' ---..-.1 (Agenda_Item #1...4) _ . _ 1 ordinance~----=-- 1---- --J. ~-~--,-- --- Meeting '.- '-. -.-'-...... . - --' .-.. ...,.; ,..... ..._.1.',: __ ::",:.: . IIA " ~ \. . 'CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL ·AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop B20~ at 7:30 p.m. OD Se~tember 26, 1983 ITEM ACTION TAKEN Invocation Consideration of Minutes of the Re l'ar Meetin Se temher 12, 1983 ~nn~;ñer~rin~ of Cn~~p~r A~p~n~ Trprn (~). ( f/13 , 4 16, 1 7, 18, 1 9 , . 20, 21, 2 2 ,. 2 3 & 24) ---'"'-'"' .-- ..---- -- ... -- - ...- --. . 7{1Ðf1. Cn:n ~ i ri P"r;:; t i f"1)1 ('\ f A D~ n; T1 rmp1)t c: t ("\ 'Rn;>"r ri n f . 7) .fF --lr Þbat~nt Qf Dan~eTnl)S Bui1qin~~ I L' /-. 0, L.I Consideration of ADDointment s to Civil ~~ ¡ Service Commission /1 PLA1\~ING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING ..- ¡ PZ 83-52~ Reouest of Muhsen Shabout to I I I- I , Rezone Lot 2, Block 11, EmeTêlò Bills L AdGition from 1~-9-0~e F2~ilv D~elling to Local Retail (LocEted on t~e ~ast Side c: ~y-: c: BOt!' PY2-è ë7:C Munèe: o""} the ~ 0i 1.:"!: r--,,\~ '\~C A ') , "\~'S-~.; ,~t.., . - . ".. _~.... .... '., J".",,_ ..~...'>,"",,_ ~., Page-Z . -CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North'Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. on SeDtember 26. 1qRQ ITEM ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Ordina PLANNING & ZONING - Rezone Tract 1 Abstract ~ Lot 2 Block 2 'Smithfield ._._=_==_. . \·;aste y *lk~ PLANNING & ZONING - PS / / I' Aubre Brothers for Rec I Final Plat of Flamin~o Estates I (Denied bv Counc11 3i12ß3 & Referred .---L- I ¡ back to City Staff) I ./:~consideration of Request of Hal tom/RiChland ~__~+çÞamber of Commerce for a Portion of i __.______-1- Revenue from the HotelLMotel Tax j . ,_.. I Consideration of_Ordinance on Industrial I -r- ¡ , ¡ j .~¡_6_~___. _Permits _ ---------- ..- _. .-.- ---.-- -- -....----.... _..~- - --,- ---- · \ eage 3 ·CITY OF NORTH'RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North 'Richland Hills City Hall, Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 pÞm. OD September 26. 198~ NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *1 Consideration of Amendment to Contract of Fort Worth for Treatment of -al Waste * ·on of Xero Lease Purchase * Bid for Mor an ovements *21. onsiàeration of Partial Pa Estimate I #8, in the Amount of 52 795.28 to , $tolaruk Corporation - North Hills Street f ~ainage Improvements t ! Consideration of Partial Payment, I ¡ n7. in the Amount of $71,936.15 to I StQLaruk Cor~oration - Holidav North I S~et and Drainage Improvements , I ¡ Consideration of Ordínftnce Amending I _.~- Estimate I r- ! ¡ , I f 1 __*.2 2 . ,... : _ *2 ~ . Orrì;'n~-nl"'e No. 181 \\1ater and SeV.7er Policv -; ~~ '¡- 1,,'T~ter Ril1~Pollcv Cþanee (PostpoI1ed ! .-c_ I _____~~¡he S~--1~ 1983" }ieetin&..._- _ _---Û.r.n j n ~ n r p N (). ] 0 I) 6 ) .____________1.__ ·J~' . Page 4· . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting conducted at the North 'Richland Hills City Hall CouDcil Chambers. 7301 N.E. Loop 820~ at 7:30 p.m. on September 26, 1983 ~"UMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *24. Consideration of Ordinance Establishing Fees 'for Copying of Various City Documents __25 . /l Reconsideration of Request of KEM ~( ^-~' ~ Advertisin2. for a Billboard Permit I 0,7 , \. 26 Reconsideration of Request of Mobil Oil ':> for Variance from Sign Ordinance 27. Citizen Presentation - 28. Adiournment I -L_ I I I- I ,_.... I I j ..-_.: - -~. - - - _.--~---- -------. ¡ --i--- I ~ · . ~ ,* f ,,* ~. ; . To:- Rodger Line, City Manager From: Stan Gertz, Fire Chief Re: Advance Life Support, Emergency Ambulance Service . The City of North Richland Hills began its ambulance service in April 1978t and fees charges today are the same as when this service began. With the recent beginning of more costly and more effective Advance Life Support (Paramedic Service w/drugs)t the following items need to be addressedt such as ambulance feest practicest billing, collections, Medicare and policies. Listed below are sub-titles of areas which explain our procedure, then the procedures of other ambulance services which are privately owned or city operated. Following this report will be the suggestions of the department head to reduce timet money expended, man hours and increase city income. Ambulance Fees North Richland Hills charges $40 for all local hospitals and $60 for any hospital in Fort Worth, this is for a basic life support ambulance call. . CITY/COMPANY LOCAL FORT WORTH DALLAS Basic/Advance Basic/Advance Basic/Advance North Richland Hills $40/NA $60/NA $60/NA Bedford Fire Dept. $35/$45 $40/$50 $50/$60 *Richland Hills F.D. $40/$40 + $60/$60 + $100/$100 + H.E.B. Hospital $50/$80 $65/$95 $85/$115 **Regional Amb. Sere $70/$90 + $100/$100 + $100/$100 + **Danie1s Amb. Sere $70/$90 + $100/$100 + $100/$100 + **Metro Amb. Sere $70/$90 + $100/$100 + $100/$100 + *Richland Hills Fire Dept. rates will also have added to the fee, drugs (at cost) and milage on Medicare and Medicaid patients. **Regional, Daniels and Metro Ambulance Services fees are set by the City of Fort Worth. The figures listed are base fees only and do no' reflect the total cost to the patient. See attachment "A" for detail breakdown. . All of the companies and cities surveyed as of June 6, 1983 indicate they will seek a rate increase in the near future. Practices All City owned/operated governmental agencies are of the opinion, if a tax payer 4IÞ does request ambulance service, no matter how serious the injury, the injured are usually transported to their hospital. Patients who request nori-emergency transfer to a hospital for out-patient treatment are normally referred to a company who specialize in this type of service. Privately owned ambulance companies will transport or transfer anyone for a fee. The City of North Richland Hills usually. will transport any sick or injured upon request to any local or Fort Worth Hospital. Approximately two (2) times a year a transfer will be made to Dallas, these type of calls are usually burn victims or small children going to Parkland Hospital for severe type injuries. Billing On the 5th, 15th, and 25th of each month ambulance bills are mailed out. Each patient is billed only once per month for a period of three (3) months. In the fourth (4th) . month the patient receives a letter stating court action wi~l be taken if the invoice is not paid within ten days. After court action has been taken and the bill is not paid a judgement is filed on them in small claims court. (This item will be discussed later in this report.) . Collections All billing and collections of monies are done by the fire department clerk. Deposits are made through the Finance Dept. of the city. "Past Due Accounts" were taken to Small Claims Court for collection in the past, due to increase in court fees and a change in the laws, the defendant has the right for his/her case to be heard in the precinct they live. Some of the past due accounts live in other parts of Fort Worth, other cities in Texas and other states. The amount of money owed does not warrant the additional money spent by the city and city employee salary and travel expenses to collect the forty or sixty dollar account. The department head (Gertz) chose after the last court filed cases (Oct. 1982) to terminate this procedure as of thirteen cases filed only two paid the past due bill. Looking at Attacèunent "B", the amount of money not paid by North Richland Hills' residents is quite substantial, let alone the monies not paid by non residents. 4IÞ Med~care/Medicaid Medicare and Medicaid patients are usually billed three times. If the patient 4IÞ requests assistance in filling out forms, the fire department clerk will complete the forms and mail them. Should the account be paid in when the Medicare check is returned to the city, the city inturn mails the overpayment to the patient. In the event of no payment by the patient and only Medicare pays, the account then has a zero balance. All the aforegoing information are some of the major problems and various types of incidents the fire department has experienced in the past five and one half years. The review of Ordinance /1698 and its amendments (see Attachment "e") in comparison to the problems and procedures have changed since the instituting of the emergency ambulance service. Recommendations Ambulance fee to be increased to: 1. N/E Tarrant County Hospitals $60 plus $20 for drugs. 2. Fort Worth Hospitals $100 plus $20 for drugs. . Billing Mail the ambulance customer the standard three (3) notices and in the fourth month send a stern letter. The collection procedure to remain in the fire department at this time and later be intergrated into the system of the central cashier at City Hall. Collections - Past Due The procedure in collecting policy by utilizing the local county court is not working, time consuming, expensive and there is no way to penalize the non-paying person. It is recommended, after three billings and one letter to allow thirty (30) days to pay the past due invoice, then turn the account over to Chilton Credit Reporting Company (formerly Fort Worth Credit Bureau). 4IÞ . Checking the background of Sh~_~~~~ Credit Reporting Co. indicates they are a reputable company who does not use strong arm tactics in collecting past due accounts for businesses. Chilton's procedure in collecting on ~he accounts con- sists of the person who owes the debt will receive a letter stating if the bill is not settled within three weeks it will reflect on their credit rating. Should the person then still refuse to settle the account, this infraction will be placed on their credi't rating for seven years and will remain there for the next seven years even if the account is settled prior to that time. There is no fee charged for this service except the company will retain 50% of all money collected in behalf of the city. To institute this type of program, it will be necessary for the city to enter into this collecting procedure. John Whitney (Purchasing Agent for the City) when contacted about. this company stated the Chilton Company is the only company of this type he would recommend and he definitely would like to review this contract prior to it being signed by the City Manager. Whitney also stated there are two sentences he has problems with. As this type of contract comes under a "Professional Service" the City Manager could have the city enter into this agreement. This would expediate this procedure on the money owed to the city. . Should the City Manager and council elect this procedure it is recommended all accounts prior to August 23, 1983 be marked off 'as a loss and begin with a clean slate to extablish an accurate record in using this type of collection procedure. Medicare/Medicaid Medicare/Medicaid will pay only 80% of the ambulance base rate fee, based on $40 as that is the average for the metroplex in ambulance service fee. Medicare and Medicaid will pay other charges such as milage, drugs, oxygen etc., or at best a portion of this fee. It is recommended these additional expenses be billed through Medicare/Medicaid which require each invoice to be itemized. Persons covered by Medicare/Medicaid being on fixed incomes usually cannot afford any other emergency fees not covered by this type of insurance. It is recommended after Medicare/Medicaid makes their payment and there is an unpaid balance remain- ing, that this remainder be carried as a zero balance and marked paid in full. . · , t . . . . SuIDation These have been only recommendations, but it is the desire of the department that the ordinance be kept simple in its contex and leaving a lot of the decision process to the City Manager and Fire Chief. itted, Fire Chief 1 , DATE: September 26, 1983 .SUBJECT:. . Appointment to Board of Abatement of Dangerous Buildings DEPARTMENT: Administr·ation BACKGROUND: Council approved an ordinance June 13_ 1983. creating ·the Board for Abatemént of DangeroUS Buildings located in the Citv. Appointments are needed to fill the Board. . CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES NO ~--~--~~~~~---~-~~-~~-~~---~-~--~--~~--~-~-~~~-~--~--~~~---~~~---~~--~-~~~-~~-~-~-~~-~~--~- . . . . Suggested Members for Board of Abatement of Dangerous Buildings .Joe Coulson Orville Baker Gerald Stewart John Larriviere Timothy J. Crowley (Profile Sheet Attached) Council contact person - Mayor Faram Council contact person - Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey Council contact person - Councilman Fisher Council contact person - Councilman Davis ~ -# PROFILE 'FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS .ame Timothy J. Crowley Address 7308 Londondary Drive, North Richland Hills, "Texas 76180 Employer Harris! Finley, Creel &-Bogle, P.C. Phone: -Home 656-5173 Office . 335-5050 Wife's Name Victoria Children's Name and'Ages Robbie - age 4 years; Matt - aqe 2 years . " Resident 'of thè Çity since Ma y, 1 9 8 3 ,,/ Previous Residence 5404 73rd, Lubbock, Texas Occupation Attorney Do you own rea 1 property in North Ri chl and Hf 11 51 Yè.S_~ X .. .' No Memberships~ Organizations and Previous E~erience on City Commission:' .. Tarrant, County Bar Associa tion .. Texas Young Lawyers Assoc±ation State· Bar of. Texas ' Comment (About yourself, why you wish to serve, qualifications and otil~r pertinent info~ation~) I would like to make a contrîbution tö the City' of North Richland Hills. Although m~family has been residihq· ih the City only a short time, we are very impressed with the area and the people and would like to become involved. As ~n attorney, I am aenerallv ___fam~liar with abatement and condemnation eroceedings and would 4IÞ- consider it my privilege to serve the City of North Richland Hills. ~.....-... -...-..-.....- --_. --- f DATE: SeptPmhpr ?h1 lqR1 .. SUBJECT :, (. \ Appointments to Civil Service Commissjon DEP ARTMENT : Civil Service BACKGROUND: There are three terms expiring i~ Ortnhpr 1"h; c:: ; c:: ~ M~ jTor ' â appointment confirmed bv the Council. (. CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: ~~--~-~-~~-~~~--~-~----~~--~-~-~---~~--~~----~-~~----~~-~--~~-~--~~~-~~~~~---~~----~~~-~--- . . City of J(ðrth Richland Hills, Texas ~ ~,::- TO: Rodger Line City Manager DATE: September 22, 1983 FROM: Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: P & Z Cases to be heard by City Council September 26, 1983 PZ 83-52 APPROVED BY P & Z (20 were contacted) Request of Muhsen Shabout to rezone a portion of Lot 2, Block 11, Emerald Hills Addition, from its present classification of IF-7-0ne Family Dwellings to a proposed classification of Local Retail. This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and is bounded on the south by the YMCA. . PZ 83-55 APPROVED BY P & Z (13 were contacted) Request of Roger Williams to rezone Tract lC. J. M. Crockett Survey, Abstract 273, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of IF-9-1300. This property is located at 6808 Smithfield Road. PS 83-79 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Roger Williams for Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 2, Smithfield Addition. PS 83-14 DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL 3/1983 & REFERRED BACK TO CITY STAFF Request of Aubrey Brothers for reconsideration of final plat of Flamingo Estates. . (817) 281..()()41n301 N.E. LOOP 820IP.O. BOX 18601/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TX 76118 To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records r • DATE: September 22, 1983 SUBJECT: PZ 83-52 Zoning request from 1F-7 to Local Retail on a portion of Lot 2, Block 11 Emerald Hills Addition DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This is a portion of the YMCA property on the East side of Davis Boulevard, bounded on the North by the Doctor's office and on the South by the YMCA. The owner wished to develop for Local Retail use with possibly a Day-Care Center on the back portion. There were 20 property owners within 200 feet contacted. No one came to contest this request, but we received a letter from one property owner stating she felt it should stay single family The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A /� _ • !' ~" -..~.,~~., ... ~,,"..," .... Page 17 p & Z Minutes August 25, 1983 . 13. PZ 83-52 . . . ... . c:...:....- , ~. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in·opposit· replat to please com ward. no one wishing to speak, t airman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 83-89 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Muhsen Shabout to rezone a portion of Lot 2, Block 11, Emerald Hills Addition, from its present classification of IF-7-0ne Family Dwellings to a proposed classification of Local Retail. This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and is bounded on the south by the YMCA. Jack Roseberry came forward to represent Mr. Shabout. He said Mr. Shabout has been a resident of North Richland Hills for 18 months and he now desires to build something 'nice on this property. Mr. Roseberry said Mr. Thompson with YMCA and a representative of Henry S. Miller Company are here to answer any questions the Commission might have. Mr. Bowen asked if Mr. Shabout had any plans for the property. Mr. Roseberry said if it is economically feasible, Mr. Shabout would like to put a Day Care Center on the back portion of this property. Arthur Thompson with YMCA came forward. He said they are in favor of this zoning change. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. . . Page 18 ~;. p & Z Minutes August 25~ 1983 PZ 83-52 APPROVED 15. PZ 83-54 ,,,,..- ,./'- ",/~ // ./ ~ / // / /- // .// .~ ./" ~~ /",. ,/ ../ ,/ ,.// . C'~'~ ~. Mrs. Calvert stated she had received a letter from Mrs. Frances Ballew, 7812 Emerald Hills Way, who is against this zoning request and feels it should stay zoned for single family dwellings. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen said he does not feel property on Davis Boulevard should stay single family and he believes Local Retail is the logical zoning classification for this property. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 83-52. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. Request of M & W Investments to rezone a portion of Tract 4, T. Akers Surve , Abstract 19, from its present classification of Agriculture t a proposed classification of I ustrial. This property is located the railroad property on t north side of Northeast Loop 820. the Public lIed for those wishing this request to "",' ,/ Chairman Tucke Hearing and to speak /. please~~ome forward. ,,/ ~~Nance with M & W Investments came ;~'~orward. He said they are requesting /~ Industrial zoning since there is a large tract adjacent to this property that is zoned Industrial. Mr. Nance said they want to put up a billboard on the railroad property which had not been zoned. Mr. Hannon said their description shows they are requesting to go out to the center line of the Freeway. Mr. Nance said that was the metes and bounds given them by the railroad, but they plan to put the billboard on the railroad property. .........:I~·~-'r-..· ... ~~~~~~~~h C· ):·1 .~ ~~... t.·~.·:.~ ~%~~::~~::.' .~! ~-. .~~~~~~ - <.' '~t~~;·-:· -.... ::] . '"'::-.. ~. ..... ~ '~.-' ?~.:.~ ~ - . . .. ~..: ..: .;~..'. .-:.... ~ '"; ...... _ .,',. .., a' -.... . ...... ....~ -~. .I! ..... -.-...... ......... , .. . .: .~~. ~ ,... ~..... !'t..~ . .. -' ~ -. .. .. ."..,!... ....: . ... - ~.. ~. ..: . ~ -:-~ -.: - .. .I ....:. , 'T ¡ -~, :1 ,': , ,- . - I ":: ~r," ~ . , ,:~~;',-- ": --;~~. ".. ....."-. .-.: - '-- ...,. . .~,.~ ," .:" .. .. - ~.". ,1." .- _ . .... , -~~ ..:j</';~~,~:;'~~.ii~ - :;- , .... '. ~ f·3· -;;L, .'~ c:.'-~~t.2..-"·~";~"'¿;.:i~;:....~~t.~~! . ø .' . ~i~~¿'iK~: ...~ ~ " '.; ~.:~¡.~;;':'. j.-,t ~~~'~i·_... ., .... ..' ',- , "~-:... ..... .. ---. ---- - - @..,... :'~.,'J ,.,:.-, --- '- -- P2. i" :.. - , ' ,-- . "'"\.... ~ ':" '.: i '''';'' -' ~ .:~J) . "__. '- /4~ .'.~ ..- .-"~-.... ~~11tt; ~ .:: ,:L~·:::::. ..; ,~ r·-:'~-~-~~;:~-~:~ ~ ".... --:. :-:--=-..~. --:.' .... _:,.~. 0" , . :_-::.... ~"'''~'''.~!.: ~.-: ---7 . - --. - ........- -.. *'- ... -.' .- . ....-/ ..~. . ... . (~-" ~" ('~" \(y · K NOWL TON-E NG LI S H-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 16, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-52, IF-7 TO L.R., GRID 114 · We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. w,.~ RWA/l jc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works · c~¡:o-- 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 ~ :. · .. G.O~ n . vJ . --:;:.\- ¿::' : --.co r h~ r'" ~ fz 23 -:sd.-- ~ ,.) n, t t~ 3 Cone./' 27 G ~- 4- CVÞ"'b I- . ~' LVood r ~ nc c: I r~ i ( 1- S ~".,. ':0 n Vol. 3B8- 30) ~.Ol 8~~ ~ ~ De t~.' , I 1'= 2 Q , . I , i ..~ - à ~ ~ \- ~ ~I 6' V) ,\3 . ~ Co'" > '\i\~ n h ~ " t\.,-' f\J a " ;: oJ : ~Ç,) \)()~ --. ~ ~ " '~ \) ~ a - CO ~ tv) '8J cO ~ '. C) ^' \: ~ ....... U I ::-"" ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ -':(; 3 p~ ~ I --- ::t: B l) -- \J \.' \} € 'ò ..--- ® ; .. C\) 'í. o ~r:' H.-cfT. (p. P. ·r °So'4j"w 34(P· "3 '0 t LL '-./ .J 2 Yz.. ",ro~ o. ..,. CLæT 'T é:LC. seRvice LI nc (J ~ ~ - t , , , , j . " TI-IC SU(lVc'v SHown I~C~~or) IS ,; : /.) /?êP((C$C()íI3TJOn OF ~() /JCíunL i Fie LOr; ù t'2 V C c¡ (0 /J 0 é:. I n T 1-/ ~ rn 0 ý) í J-I l 0 F JU n C f I ~ 83. TI ~ C r2 [' IJ RC n 0 ê n- ~ .0I1CHr11C n rs . PROTRusIons oR.. /JP- i e/JRcnr ê)(Y)'TS êXCé:.er /J) SHown. i TI-I C. Co rê n {' 12 ~ /J R. C ~ S' S 11 ú t.v rJ I-/C f( ¿ 0 n . SCÅLÓ: ¡II-= 100' !, ~; ~ i I i .~ I i I ~ (j~ /O'~?ì~ COe( O. LA noes }(,)~ S #¡&8fp ,^-- .. .. .. ~~: . .? ~ - . ~ . .y . ~.to:.. 1:.. . .;f-~ , ~.' ~~~ --J' , : ...: ~ 4 · ". . , .-.. ......... ............., ~ .~ ~ Y D ! " N 0 E S ) ) ... . . . .. .. . . . . . . · . . .. ....... t , ., ~... 1 8 8 6 .:~ , (.... ··.r \.~.·o( · a '. . .~ I . , t ., . . £. ~ - 1../ ....... J"" , ,C S I..~ ,"', ,. 'w'" ~ m~p O~ 2.40(0 IJCr(cS OF LfJ nD L.-IJ n o'~!: I /) s:-- oC I () C . " I" /; J.}' - T . . !.J I T -' ]. ~) Ge {~ A J?o,t io 1"'1 Of Lo f Z. ß loe- k.. I' ~. (~eYeLlc1 H/IIs An /Jdd;l-/tJrt r;,Thc \ j C ; + '( 0 { n . 1C i chI 0. '" c1 1-4 .. 1/ 5 A cc 0 r d : ~ To T h <!. ¡? lot /2 e. COr d e dIn Vol . ? ,~' ..c.~ - I ...._~ (. 0" , I r:; T ( P r:< ") .. . (~, .: . I , - , ...:" / ,/ . / ; /":". 11 ;;,... ì ~ . 'tC r JL¡; Å LANCES & A'SSOCIATESJ INC. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYORS . 1020 M~CON STREET, SUITE 10 . FORT WORTH, TEXAS 7610~ e (a17) 870·1220 July I, 1983 FIELD r~OTES t 2.406 Acres of land being a part of Lot 2, Block 11 Emerald Hills Addition to .the City of North Richland Hills as recorded in Volume 388/156, Page 58 Tarrant County Plat Records, said 2.406 acres of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: ,'" BEGINNING at a ~ inch iron rod found in the easterly right of way line of Davis Boulevard, (F.M. Highway 1938), said iron rod being the northwest corner of said Lot 2, Block 11 and the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block ,2 of Emerald Hills Addition as recorded in Volume 388/1411 Page 42, Tarrant County Plat Records; .. THENCE N 89° 42' 27" E, 327.42 feet to a ~ inch iron rod found in the west line of Block 11 of Emerald Hills Addition as recorded in Volume 388/39, Page 01, Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE S 00° 34' 28" Ttl, 309.94 feet along a fence line to a ~ inch iron rod at a fence corner, the southwest 'corner of said Block 2 and a reentrant corner of said Lot 2, Block 11; THENCE S 89° 50' 43" W, 346.93 feet to a ~ inch iron rod set in the aforementioned easterly right of way tine of Davis Boulevard, said iron rod being the beginning of a non- tangent curve to the right whose radius is 5669.60 feet and whose long chord bears N 04° 11' 04" E, 310.02 feet; THENCE along said right of way lin~- and along said curve to the right ina northeasterly directiòn thru a central angle of 03° 081 a distance of 310.06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 2.406 Acres of land. . ."A", 411 OF t,· ".. 4'''-~~'.. . :. . . .. ê J- ~, /. ^'~.. W~ ..~~ '-'..1 .:¥::? . \S'~ ~'~~ö7î:S'4:-:~' . ~~ · ·..·V· ~~~. , ?:~.. -I 8 8 6 .:~, i':. ¿,' · .. \. 0 .. ..;:) '\' ~.,:\'" (" c , S T t .. . · ~..J.;: ( 'OÞ' I .. . ~.. 1\.. Co. I C· · ·5· : " '(').:~ ,. .. v'/Þ ...~w~ #83113 ORDINANCE NO. fu,'i AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-52 the following described property shall be rezoned from 1F-7-One Family Dwellings to Local Retail. 2.406 acres of land being a part of Lot 2, Block 11, Emerald Hills Addition to the City of North Richland Hills as recorded in Volume 388-156, Page 58, Tarrant County Plat Records, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 4 inch iron rod found in the easterly R.O.W. line of Davis Boulevard, (F.M. Highway 1938) , said iron rod being the northwest corner of said Lot 2, Block 11, and the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2 of Emerald Hills Addition as recorded in Volume 388-141, Page 42, Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE North 89 degrees 42 minutes 27 seconds East, 327.42 feet to a / inch iron rod found in the west line of Block 11 of Emerald Hills Addition as recorded in Volume 388-39, Page 01, Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE South 00 degrees 34 minutes 28 seconds West, 309.94 feet along a fence line to a ' inch rod at a fence corner, the southwest corner of said Block 2 and a reentrant corner of said Lot 2, Block 11; THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes 43 seconds West, 346.93 feet to a 1 inch iron rod set in the aforementioned easterly R.O.W. line of Davis Boulevard, said iron rod being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right whose radius is 5669.60 feet and whose long chord bears North 04 degrees 11 minutes 04 seconds East, 310.02 feet; THENCE along said R.O.W. line and along said curve to the right in a northeasterly direction thru a central angle of 03 degrees 08 minutes a distance of 310.06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 2.406 acres of land. Page 2 This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and is bounded on the south by the YMCA. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 25th DAY OF AUGUST, 1983. C (�/AI CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION �/fy�'7 SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-83-52 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS • .. , .., þ 1 I I I DATE: September 22. 1983. .SUBJECT:. PZ 83-55 " ( : Zonin re uest from A riculture t Tract l"C J .M. Cro k tt Survey, Abstract 273 ( will be' platted as Lot 2 .; Blk. 2. Smithf ield Additio DEP ARTMENT : Planning and Zoning " BACKGROUND: This property is located at 6808 Smithf ield Road. It has an old h01.1SP on t-h; ~ property and "the owner wishe"s to remodel it but· the had not b There were 13 property owners contacted and no one osition to this - The Planning and Zoning Còmmission recommended a rov~l of this zonin re uest. . CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zonin2 request. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NOX ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ~ 1}~-/C~ ------------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------ . Page 20 P & Z Minutes August 25, 1983 ¡.. .r~> ~., , - .J :>." ,..., -.\.-11!" . 16. PZ 83-55 . PZ 83-55 APPROVED 17. PS 83-79 e -~'~ . . o c-~ ~_.. Request of Roger Williams to rezone Tract lC, J.M. Crockett Survey, Abstract 273~ from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of IF-9-l300. This property is located at 6808 Smithfield Road. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Jackey Fluitt with Stembridge and Associates came forward to represent Mr. Williams. He stated that ·Mr. Williams wants to remodel his house and was told he had to zone and plat his property before he could obtain a building permit. Mr. Hannon asked if his house would meet IF-9 zoning. Mr. Fluitt said it does not now, but it should when Mr. Williams remodels it. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 83-55. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Roger Williams Form Plat of Lot 2, Block Smithfield Addition. forward. He said this e lot with an existing house o t. Mr. Fluitt said they had received the City Engineer's letter and take no exception to the comments. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 83-79 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. . .. . , ~.. (...... - · ...r..' ..... ..-;. -"of (..,. . \;- . K NOWL TON-E NG LIS H-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth· Dallas August 16, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-55, AGRIC. TO IF-9-1300, GRID 69 . We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. .. ~ RWA/l jc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works e 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283·6211· METRO/267·3367 , y z. F 3 -6~5-- .. ~ · 106. 22' -- s 04°/8' W ~ I I , K I · l I LIJ ~ 0 ;,~ ,CD CI) LIJ o ro o m Q) z ~ o v q- ----(-7L - FRAME RESIDENŒ 24.2' eft) Q Nfl ··-·34.0 -~ · .. rt) ,....:. IC) A ~þj . fa f' ~ pl1' \. V , . ~{ /1 Vi IX I ~.O' - .. NORTH 6808 SMITHFIELD RD. The ~Iðt hereon II I I rue. correct and Kcurata repr_nÞ"on at the property 81 delermined by $UNeY. the hnott: and dimenllonl of said property being indlcalld by the plet. the 112e, 100001lon and type of bulldin", and improwments erl .. mown, "I impro...menu being wilhln the boundarlM of Ihi property. let beck from property linll$ the diaÞnc:e indICated. Thttre .re no enr08C:hment6, contlicb or protr~io", ucept .. Ihown . 0.'8 . :<1 2' ,) J 1, 1 ~) ö 3 G.F. No. 77 ( J·1 (. I 5 () I Sc*e 1 .l11(~j1 = ~ f(.!~t , ì ' . I ,. 0, awn bV - . I. . \ . NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Legend: L: F .nee Corner o Steel Rod Found Stvel Rod Set Chafn L ink Fence Wood Fence Property Line _A~ ." ~ OF ~ ~ ~ ~~~········.f-t ~ )"':.... ~ ..:r!~" j.. . ~ ....' , . . ..: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . ., C THOMAS W. VOGT ) ,·····················~···f ,~.. 1928 .:9:, C· ... ~ Q . ~O .I' '<9··.!.G'STI.....·£~ .. ~ (, ······a~v 4 ",C SUP,' 'v~ ,., ./ ....,~,. / .. .~~ 8y ~~~.. ;:;;. .:..~ -, ...., Reg;n.rKJ Profeu ion" ~g;neér Regtstered Publi~ Surveyor ") ,,~'-'E -. - x- -- \\t í::'~~1 Laftd PL.nn'ng, )I'-u ~_ Sun-.,~ anG O.~ .......... ...c I~O-O ,." ~~ 01. .. ..,. .. 1owI,. 101 ~"'. T)( '.06¡ --- a< ... .. · · · . . v ( ',1 ft.", ~ " .' 1:. .. f" I" . ' ."' . ~.-*:.:: . ,', - ~ ~ " I , 'b" , '. " i .Àt'· .. .~.,'¡_ ' ...S- ~ : ~I ...... -- f . .~.;;- ! ,: 4_~ \ ~...' '. ..'; .~. ~~. : j- -: '. ,~. ; ",1;~~, .. ". .. - -~ ~ . ". ~ t,~. :,~ , :. PHO}).ERTY I)ESCRIIJTICJN : TO l\LJ4 PA}(TII:;-S INTERE~)TED IN l'I<FJ1ISES SURVEYED a Tt1is is to .certify· t11at I have, tJ1is date, made a careful and accurate survey on ~th~ ground of property located at úUOB Scnithfield Road in trte ·Ci.ty of tJl)rtl1 f\ir:1\land !1ills, Tarrant County, Texas, b~ing described as follow~: A tract of' lançl out of t11~ "Jl)HN'r"1. CRt)CKETT SURV~;Y, Abstract No., 27'3, '¡arrant County I 'fexas, bei~g described by -l~etes and bounds as fo1110w5; . l~EGlr'JtJIr'J(; at an iron rod in the east· ri'Jr.t of '''lay' lilìe ~;l~li thf ield Road a.nd 73 feet nortr1 of the northwest corner of LCJt 1, Block 2, S~r1'JiFrELD l\DDI1'IOtJ to trle City· of tJort11 lhchlùnd Hills, t)::) recorded in Volume .388-133, Po1~e 10, Plat ¡':r~cord5, 'l'arrarlt COUfity, 'Te;<as¡ 'rli¡:~J(;E Nortll Wit~1 said right ()f Wd}' lirle 1()6.'J feet tCt~', an iroT1 rOt1 [or a corrlE~r; 'I'11f~ì~(~E South 89 de~lrees 30 rnir¡utes East, !}48.5 feet to ill1 iron rod for a corrle.r; TI1EtJCI~ Soutl1 ()4 deg rees 18 rninutes \-.est, 1 ÇJ7 . 2 2 f'(~et to êU1 iron rod for. a corner) T¡iE~JCE ~\Jorth è)9 degrees 30 %ninutl~s \'Jest, 4~il1.'16 feet to ttle J)()Il~T O'F B-EG It~NI N(~ and COIl ta ini!1~J 1. l)i1 ~crcs of larld rnore or less. I f ~ .;. . . ; . . - _...,;., -'~...... .' .... f· ....- - '-""", : "" }4L~6~. ~ .; ..'II .; ( ì' The pl-' hereon ¡a . t ""., co,.,..ct ~ açcurate repr...ntatK>n of the property.. determined by 1UfWV, the U,. and åtmensåoM of laid property being ~ted bv the p4~t, the Ii~. location and type of build',. and imp~b art .. Ihown, ... 'mprOWlMn\l btin8 within Þ bou~'" of the property, _t beck from property HMI the ~ tndtcet.d. There In no enroedvnenta, conf'ictl or p,,:otrUltona .~t. ~. Oeta G.F. No. Sc.Ie D~by t...Qend : >iay 04, 1983 7 7 tJ 4 () 1 incìl = 20 feet T . \ "t . V . o Fence Corner o Steel Rod Found S1Hf Rod Set NOT fOR CON$TRUCTION /*'-/ V ay ~u!v}~ ;: ~ Regi..red P'ro*-sloñ.l Enei.....,- , R~ Pubtic Surveyor 4'.~ ~ ~ OF ~ ...... ~ ~':-........~-+:....., I ~~.. ~ ...:!\S\ ".. . .' * : . . . . : . . ., , . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ) C THOMA~. .~:. ~.~~....f '···~······1928 :.9:' , ~. ~. . ft" · - - -.0 f ,"""'ð- ..! · , . , t. .. · . ~~ . .., (I ....... .~~ ,.. ',C SU ,. ~.. N '''"7""'. Lao.- ......nIns, ')Ii-Ìi1)~r .....ey... - 0MIfn ...-..... - 1600 H. ~00d Dr. .,,,.. at ~,... '1>1 ~, n 7", --x--- Ch..n Link Fençe Wood F.nça p~ Line --- ~ ---- ....... ORDINANCE NO. lib' L ' AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-55 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to 1F-9-1300. BEING a tract of land out of the John M. Crockett Survey, Abstract 273, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod in the east R.O.W. line of Smithfield Road and 73 feet north of the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Smithfield Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, as recorded in Volume 388-133, Page 40, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North with said R.O.W. line 106.0 feet to an iron rod for a corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 30 minutes East, 448.5 feet to an iron rod for a corner; THENCE South 04 degrees 18 minutes West, 107.22 feet to an iron rod for a corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes West, 440.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.08 acres of land more or less. Page 2 This property is located at 6808 Smithfield Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 25th DAY OF AUGUST, 1983. 4ff:? _ re. C Tamer CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLAPNI 1w a COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-83-55 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE MOORE, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE: September 22, 1983 SUBJECT: PS 83-79 Short Farm Plat of Lot 2, B1oc1_ 2, Smithfield A-1.,•1t inn DETAR1y.EA'L: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This arc erty is located at 6808 n . ., Th- - vestin• h • 3e on this property so they only had to Short Form plat the property. The corrections have been made on the plat including addition of utility easement as recap__1 by TESCO. The Planning and Zoning Corts,ission recommended approval of this that subiect to the Fngjn«s_ s comments. • CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIR"l: Approval or den`al of plat BUDGETED 'ITEM: YES NO R ACCOUNT NCYBER: N/A __ Page 20 ` P d Z Minutes - August 25, 1983 16. PZ 83-55 Request of Roger Williams to rezone Tract IC, J.M. Crockett Survey, Abstract 273, from its present classification of Agriculture to . proposed classification of 1F 1300. This property is located at •:08 Smithfield Road. Chairman Tucker opened he Public Hearing and called f• those wishing to speak in favor • this request to please come forw. d. Jackey Fluit' with Stembridge and Associates came forward to represent Mr. Will ams. Be stated that Mr. Willi-+'s wants to remodel his house and as told he had to zone and plat h - property before he could obtain a suilding permit. Mr. Hannon asked if his house would meet 1F-9 zoning. / Mr. Fluitt said it does not now, but it should when Mr. Williams remodels it. / Chairman Tucker called for those / wishing to speak in opposition to this / request to please come forward. / There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. /' PZ 83-55 Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve / APPROVED PZ 83-55. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. 17. PS 83-79 Request of Roger Williams for Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 2, Smithfield Addition. Mr. Fluitt came forward. He said this is just one lot with an existing house on it. Mr. Fluitt said they had received the City Engineer's letter and take no exception to the comments. PS 83-79 Ms. Nash made the motion to approve APPROVED PS 83-79 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr.Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers - August 19 , 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission - - City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 - North Richland Hills , Texas 76118 _ Re: Lot 2 , Block 2 , Smithfield Addn. , Short Form Plat, PS 83-79 In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated August 16, 1983 we offer the following comments: - - a:,. 1 . This is a city staff function. 2 . A building setback line of 25 feet has been added to the plat. If there should be any further questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely, tf Lelbe k.PStembri g e,r%P .E. DRS/bb cc : Mr . Rodger N. Line , City Manager Mr . Gene Riddle , Director of Public Works Mr . Allen Bronstad , Assistant Director of Public Works An 11 alv Gnry irn • Monk P;rkland Wale Tvvv. 7L1 1R • IR17190n-1 RC'l 1 ! ' Ill) KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. JI CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas August 16, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-886, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, SMITHFIELD ADDN. , LOT 2, BLOCK 2, SHORT FORM PLAT, PS 83-79, GRID 69 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Utility companies should be contacted regarding easement requirements for this lot. 2. A building setback line of 25 feet should be shown on the plat. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call . ,/ < I RI ARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad , Assistant Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG • BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 • METRO/267-3367 • P—+ C • Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer TESCO Region Engr. Mgr. P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number PS 83-79 Smithfield Addition, Block 2, Lot 2 Address or Location: 6808 Smithfield Road Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator on one (1) copy of this form no later than August 15, 1983. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. Dc Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: TESCO: DATE H V )Q y, } SIGNATURE ( ), /'� 1�. .�1a , ■_ `` ` CITY: DATE: August 2, 1983 SIGNATURE 91/ O��-L“-1)' DATE: • 9-20-83 - SUBJECT: Flamingo Estates Platting PS 83-14 DEPARTMENT: Public.Works BACKGROUND: This plat was denied back in March of 1983. This plat was to be brought before the City Council for" reconsideration after offsite easements and agreements had been obtained. We Snow have all of these easements and agreements in hand and this plat is now ready for reconsideration by the Council. The only -thing that has not been taken care of is the escrow of $12,000 for future street improvements along Eden Road, The developer should escrow this amount with the City before we allow him to start this subdivision. • CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the final plat of Flamingo Estates subject to the $12,000 escrow for future street improvements. BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: ____________ Yth-315C ke194 (�i KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. I` CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 20, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-945, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FLAMINGO ESTATES (EDEN ADDITION) REVISED WATER, SEWER, AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION PLANS, PS 83-14 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 4 1 . We would suggest that additional water valves be located at the .J intersection of Everglade Dr. and Hialeah Circle and also at the 'b3 intersection of Hialeah Circle South and Boca Raton Dr. 2. The Public Works Department has requested that ductile iron pipe be "`S44 used on all sanitary sewer lines greater than 14 feet deep. 3. We would refer you to comments regarding special permit requirements in our review letter dated February 24, 1983, and also to pro rata considerations in our letter dated January 10, 1983. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to ccaalll l. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works • September 20, 1983 P5 83-14 PAGE 1 SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 617/263-6211 . METRO/267.3367 8/7 336-5773 TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS IJ�... C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S September 12 , 1983 Mr. Gene Riddle Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills , Texas 76118 Re: Flamingo Estates Addition Water , Sewer , and Drainage Improvements Dear Gene: We are enclosing three (3) copies of the revised plans for the subject subdivision for your review and approval . As none of the comments in the previous review letters have been related to the paving plans , we _are only enclosing the water , sewer , and drainage plans for this subdivision. The following corrections have been made : 1 . The owner ' s acknowledgement and dedication statement and notary certification have been affixed to the plat. 2. We enclose a letter of agreement from John Barfield relative to storm drainage discharge on his property to the east of Flamingo Estates . 3. The owner of the property to the north of this subdivision was unwilling to work with us on a letter of agreement for storm water discharge ; therefore , the owner of this property , Mr . Aubrey Brothers , has now purchased the adjacent property from that owner . We enclose a copy of the contract of sale for that transaction. 4 . We understand that a "Point of Service" permit has been obtained from the Trinity River Authority for connection to the 30" TRA sewer main at Precinct Line Road . 210 West 6th Street.Suite 600 Executive Plaza awlmnn Fort Worth,Texas 76102 Mr. Gene Riddle Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills September 12 , 1983 Page -2- 5. We enclose a copy of written permission from Texas Power and Light Company relative to crossing their right-of-way with the off-site sewer construction. Please note that the agreement from Texas Power and Light must be executed by the Mayor and notarized and then returned to Texas Power and Light before construction can commence. 6. We enclose copies of signed easements for the off-site sewer line from: a) Dr. Thomas Harris , b) Tarrant County , and c) John Barfield . 7. We have revised the size of the sewer line in accordance with your engineer ' s comments. 8. We have also included the use of ductile iron pipe in lieu of PVC pipe in the areas where the trench cut exceeds 20' . In addition ductile iron pipe has been specified under all creek crossings . We respectfully request that these plans be reviewed and placed on the September 26, Council meeting agenda for approval of the Final Plat for this subdivision. Should you have any questions concerning the items addressed above , please do not hesitate to call . Very truly yours , TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. ll � .. 1 . J. R1 Abard Perkins , P. E. JRP/rdk March 14, 1983 Page 10 - *15. PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-9, REQUEST 0 FLOYD J. CORNER FO FINAL PLAT OF LOT BLOCK 2, COLLEGE CIRCLE SHOPPING CENTER ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER 0 COLLEGE CIRCLE AND RUSS ROAD) APPROVE *16. PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-12, REQUEST OF FENIMORE, DUKE AND BAILEY FOR FINAL PLAT OF PARKRIDGE ESTATES(LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE, BOUNDED ON THE WES BY FOSSIL CREEK TRAILS ADDITION) rc. _ APPROVED *17, PLANNING & ZONING PS-83-14, REQUEST OF CROSS ROADS DEVELOPMENT FOR FINAL PLAT OF BLOC 8-R, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION ANI ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PROPOSED MEADO1 CREST DRIVE) APPROVED 18. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, PLANNING & ZONING to deny PS 83-14 and refer it back to the City Staff. PS 83-14, REQUEST OF AUBREY BROTHER: Councilman Kenna stated that this had been a long standing FOR FINAL PLAT OF issue within the City, it was a zoning request probably FLAMINGO ESTATES three times denied by the City Staff and Council. Councilman (LOCATED EAST OF Kenna stated that one cf the last major hurdles that the 7300 BLOCK) developers had in making this zoning change was an agreement DENIED-REFERRED formed between the developer, City and County to improve the TO STAFF street. Councilman Kenna stated that nothing had happened on the street, obtaining the easements and the drainage. Motion carried 6-0 Page 4 P & Z Minutes February 24, 1983 and item #5 has not been required bef.- but he will have this done prior •oing to council . Mr. Hannon asked Mr. B tad if the size of the meter would .:-.` necessarily be the 11/2 inch size, ■ would be determined by their need Mr. ..r onstad said that was correct. He he had discussed this with Mr. Stembridge earlier. PS 83-13 / Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve APPROVED i PS 83-13 subject to the Engineer's comments with the exception of item #2 and a clarification on item #4, that the developer will work with the City Staff to provide appropriately sized water meters at all locations. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 6. PS 83-14 Request of Aubrey Brothers for final plat of Flamingo Estates. le- Dick Perkins, Consulting Engineer for Teague Nall and Perkins, came forward to represent Mr. Brothers. He said they had received the City Engineer's letters. Mr. Perkins said the Commission agreed previously that Flamingo Estates would be sufficient for the name of this subdivision. He said they will fully execute the dedication prior to the filing of the plat. Mr. Perkins said he felt they would have no problem with obtaining a permit from the Trinity River Authority since that is a recognized point of entry. He said they were in agreement with getting a permit from TP & L . Mr. Perkins said he sees no problem with item 04. He said he has not yet done this, but they are working with Mr. Barfield, the owner of the adjacent property, to get this taken care of. Mr. Perkins said he sees no problem with item #5, the only thing, Mr. Albin is requesting they use ductile iron pipe in the trenches. He said with the creek flowing the way it does, he would like to be allowed to use this only where needed, to allow flexibility. Page 5 P & Z Minutes February 24, 1983 Mr. Hannon asked about comment k4 in the City Engineer's letter regarding the reference to using an invalue point of .010. He said our Subdivision Ordinance requires the use of .013, which is the Health Department Standards, unless there has been a change that he is not aware of. Mr. Perkins said Mr. Albin was allowing them the .010 factor because of the utilization of PVC pipe. He said he believes the .013 relates to the clay pipe. Mr. Hannon asked if it had been approved by the Health Department and had other cities approved its use. Mr. Perkins said he was sure it has been. He said they had just designed a project for the City of Hurst and were able to use a .009. Mr. Bowen stated the Commission has a letter from the Director of Public Works/ Utilities, Gene Riddle, regarding the off- ( site easements. Mr. Bowen asked if they had obtained them. Mr. Perkins said they have been working with Mr. Long in getting an approved alignment through Mr. Barfield's property. He said the problem they are having is they have not tied down the exact location of drainage channels, streets, etc. within their subdivision. Mr. Perkins said the last time he talked with Mr. Long, they had only drawn up a rough graph of the subdivision. He said what he plans to get is a 10 foot utility easement within the proposed street R.O.W. or a channel easement. Mr. Perkins said they are aware they can not begin construction until this is worked out to the city' s specifications. He said if they get approval of this plat tonight, they will get with Mr. Long and try to tie down the align- ment. He said he feels the alignment would only vary from one inch to one foot. Chairman Tucker asked about the storm water discharge. Page 6 C.:` P & Z Minutes February 24, 1983 Mr. Perkins said the storm water discharge affects two property owners, one being Mr. Barfield. He said they know they will have to get these easements before starting construction. Mr. Hannon reminded the Commission of their stipulations in approving the preliminary plat of this project. PS 83-14 Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve APPROVED PS 83-14 subject to the Engineer's comments with the exception of the name change in item f1-A, further subject to obtaining easements of the off-site sewer and approval for any plan revisions for said off-site sewer, further subject to the Developer paying to the city the sum of $12,000 upon approval of the plat, denial of access to adjacent property until that property is platted through to Precinct Line Road and the erection of barricades at the ends of the streets on the east side of the property. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. r- 7. PS 83-15 Request of Midwest Federal Savings -and Loan for replat of Lot A-R, Calloway A.- ion. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting " %sneer, came forward to represent tcc .wners of this property. He said they ,--..received the City Engineer 's co � >-'s and have complied with them. PS 83-15 Mr. Wood the motion to approve PS 83-15 APPROVED subje .• -'o the Engineer's comments. This m..-, .n was seconded by Ms. Nash and the otion carried 5-0. 8. PS 83-17 Request of Bankers Life of Nebraska for final plat of Lot 3, Block 5, Richland Oaks Addition. Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent the owner. He said they had received the City Engineer ' s • comments and they will meet all his require- ments . .. - ,. ... I' D-ATE: Se1Jtember 22't 1983, .UBJECT~ PS 83-79 Short Form Plat of Lo,t 2, Bl:oc~_ .2, Smit.hfield Adidition , . Planning and ZonLTlg DEP ARTMENT: BACKGROUND:: This pro~erty is located at 6808 SmÍ'tbfi·éld Ro:a:d \Ther·,ejs an existin~ housf:- on this propert.y· so they only had to Short Form plat the prÐpertw. ~ The correct::fDns have been made on the plat ;lnclud:i:n:g addition of u:tilitv easement as reQ:.l~'itd by TESCO", The Planning and Zoning Commission reçommepdetj appTO'Vßl of t.his plat subject, to the Engi1)!;¡:;;Y' 8 comments. . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or d p.n i.a 1 'Of Ii1 ::It' BUDGElt.lJ I.:rEM: YES NO X ACCOtTh.7 NVJmDl: N/ A . - -----------~~--~ -. -.. -- - ~......-. -- .... _.-.- -...............-........ -...... -.-- ~ -.-.. ~....._-- -......- ~-------_....-. - . . . e - ....\.- -- .:..-... Page 20 c: p & Z Minutes ~~..'''' August 25, 1983 . . <It . c··', ¥\o..i ' ',.,." .16. PZ 83-55 Request of Roger Williams to rezone Tract IC, J.M~ Crockett Survey, Abstract 273, from its present classification of Agriculture to ·proposed classification of IF- 1300. This property is located at 08 Smithfield Road. Chairman Tucker opened he Public Hearing and called f those wishing to speak in favor this request to please come forw d. Jackey Fluit with Stembridge and Associates came forward to represent Mr. Willeams. He stated that 'Mr. Willi s wants to remodel his house and as told he had to zone and plat h property before he could obtain a uilding permit. Mr. Hannon asked if his·house would meet IF-9 zoning. / // / Mr. Fluitt said it does not now, but it should when Mr. Williams remodels it. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak" the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 83-55 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 83-55. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. -..........':- -.7 ...._____ __'-....._ _,. 17. PS 83-79 Request of Roger Williams for Short Form Plat of Lot 2, Block 2, Smithfield Addition. Mr. Fluitt came forward. He said this is just one lot with an existing house on it. Mr. Fluitt said they had received the City Engineer's letter and take no exception to the comments. PS 83-79 APPROVED Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 83-79 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr.Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. . ~:i:,r.~~~~~~t~~;~·.;:':~ - ;;~ ~~ :~~~:',< J.~~~~~¡~~;~~~l:~~~·\f!i'~~~:l·:~J·~~'; '~::'::;-':.~.~,~.~ ~. ... . ~ .. ~-"' ';;:'C"" t, f- I.;, f-J.. r.;,_, , ':¡;J;':~';~J.:,.,:.., . . Ste.mbçjd.g~~,&:~ss9ci~tes, I nc. .,,~: .>..: ' ,.' . ,. 1 ann i n~'~-¡~!~:t~g comm'I·~~rf~~t~i{;;tî~'::~;C'."..' ty of North.. Ricþland Hill_~ _. 'to '>: ':~;-~þ'!~- 7301 N.E.Loop-S20 North Richland,' Hills, Lot 2, Block"2, Smithfield Addn., Short Form Plat, PS 83-79 r . . ~" .... ~ _ . _ r,' _ . ." , In respons~.-to.Know1 ton:-Engli~h':':F.Tôw..~rs letter da ted Augus t 16,1983 . of f,~j~:~~~~£~h~~'~~:~1.t.~~_t~~;~~~:.c,' This is' 'a ~ci ty staff fuñc·~iori:· - , . ' . "':.":'--~;,~~~~~,~_.,, . . - . A building' setback line:~~r·25feet has bèen added to the plat:· '-'~:"~'~f:1J~t.,F'· ," ". .,' . ';;:··f}:~i:1~1;'\.;J:-·T.>··;·' ';. . . ' ,therë·~s,lÍould be :any:"fur·th~êr7qú·ê'stioris:::regarding this leas'edo"··:Iiot;·>hesitate·'-tó~c.ål1~·' '.~', . ~ë"',,~_.,,;w' '~~.::~t': : Sincerely",' .····~lt!&1~~~.E.·...· DRS/bb cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad" Assistant Director of Public Works e - - 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 ..~ . . . ~'::ì""'" . '" . ~..r () \ /' ~- i KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 16, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-886, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, SMITHFIELD AnON., LOT 2, BLOCK 2, SHORT FORM PLAT, PS 83-79, GRID 69 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Utility companies should be contacted regarding easement requirements for this lot. 2. A building setback line of 25 feet should be shown on the plat. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021.817/283·6211. METRO/267.3367 .. "II r."" ~:' . v> (1--+t c . r . ;1 ( \ ' \c" Mr. R. E. Wehmeyer TESCO Region Engr. Mgr. P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth,. TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number PS 83-79 Smithfield Addition, Block 2, Lot 2 Address or Location: 6808 Smithfield Road Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. . Please return your, comments to Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator on one (1) copy of this form no later than August 15, 1983. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. ~ Layout is' satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made.. (See Comments) COMMENTS: TESCO: DATE _C\'t) A \q 9,) SIGNATURE \ t \, < -:\ kì d:-\"" >-.. ~"- -M"~ (}~ CITY: DATE: August 2, 1983 SIGNATURE e ) I -.--. .,..... . . .... ..' . . , . /Lj .;.... ;. - ..... - .. ~ . DATE: 9-20-83 . ::;i_~~~·~,>. . ...... . . fI"." , . - - . ......, . - SUBJECT :. .. . Flamingo Estates Plattin2" PS 83-14 DEi> ARTMENT : Public. Wo.rks BACKGROUND: This plat was denied back in March--of'1983. This plat was to be brought . . before the èity Council for'reconsideration after offsite easements and agreements had bèen obtained. We 'now have all, of these easements and. agreements in hand and this plat is now ready for reconsideration by the Council. The only ~hing that has ~ . . not ' been taken care of is the escrow of $12,000 for future st~~et improvements along Eden Road. The cl~ve1oper should escrow this amount with the City·b~fore we allow . him to start this subdivision. , . ~ {} f)k/\. i)A.AJ- -<t~~~ (ft(JA/'-- /1"t./.(Á{.,1~\(. - . CITY COUNCIL AC!ION REQUlRED~ Approve/disapprove the final· plat of Flamingo Estates subject to the $12,000 escrow for future street improvements. BUDGETED ITEM: " YES N / A NO :CCO~_~::~_~ _~ ________________~~______________ . ~. -'~: ~~~ -~.-.~ , .."... ~ ..1. . j ;.: -I - . -:. '..~ ~~:~~ :~-~ - ~ 1 ...... ~ ~ - - .:. ::- i:.<...~ ".~-1 ~ ¿~~ ~;,:",""'~-'.. ~~ ";: - . ; .. ~.~~ . ( (/- \ KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth·Oallas September 20, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-945, CITY OF NORTH HICHLAND HILLS FLAMINGO ESTATES (EDEN ADDITION) REVISED WATER, SEWER, AND STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION PLANS, PS 83-14 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would suggest that additional water valves be located at the intersection of Everglade Dr. and Hialeah Circle and also at the intersection of Hialeah Circle South and Boca Raton Dr. - 2. The Public Works Department has requested that ductile iron pipe be used on all sanitary sewer lines greater than 14 feet deep. . 3. We would refer you to comments regarding special permit requirements in our review letter dated Februa~ 24, 1983, and also to pro rata considerations in our letter dated January 10, 1983. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works September 20, 1983 PS 83-14 PAGE 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 . , . . . 817 336-5773 ~èJ TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS ~~ CON S U L TIN G E N GIN E E R S September 12, 1983 Mr. Gene Riddle Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Flamingo Estates Addition Water, Sewer, and Drainage Improvements Dear Gene: We are enclosing three (3) copies of the revised plans for the subject sµbdivision for your review and approval. As none of the comments in the previous review letters have been related to the paving plans, we are only enclosing the water, sewer, and drainage plans for:this subdivision. The following corrections have been made: 1. The' owner's acknowledgement and dedication statement and notary certification have been affixed to the plat. 2. We enclose a letter of agreement from John Barfield relative to s~orm drainage discharge on his property to the east of Flamingo Estates. 3. The owner of the property to the north of this subdivision was unwilling to work with us on a letter of agreement for storm water discharge; therefore, the owner of this property, Mr. Aubrey Brothers, has now purchased the adjacent property from that owner. We enclose a copy of the contract of sale for that transaction. 4. We understand that a "Point of Service" permit has been obtained from the Trinity River Authority for connection to the 30" TRA sewer main at Precinct Line Road. 210 West 6th Street, Suite 600 Executive Plaza Building Fort Worth, Texas 76102 . Mr. Gene Riddle Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills September 12, 1983 Page -2- 5. We enclose a copy of written permission from Texas Power and Light Company relative to crossing their right-of-way with the off-site sewer construction. Please note that the agreement from Texas Power and Light must be executed by the Mayor and notarized and then returned to Texas Power and Light before construction can commence. 6. We enclose copies of signed easements for the off-site sewer line from: a) Dr. Thomas Harris, b) Tarrant County, and c) John Barfield. 7. We have revised the size of the sewer line in accordance with your engineer's comments. 8. We have also included the use of ductile iron pipe in lieu of PVC pipe in the areas where the trench cut exceeds 20'. In addition ductile iron pipe has been specified under all creek crossings. . We respectfully request that thes~ plans be reviewed and placed on the September 26, Counc~l meeting agenda for approval of the Final Plat for this subdivision. Should you have any questions concerning the items addressed above, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. JRP/rdk \\. ~ . J. ~hard Perkins, P.E. . r. I I ' " \. . .' e. L· ~ -. L"· .~ ,',' ...,. ..4 -(" e *15. *16. *17. ~~,. :'J~\ ;,.~ ".""~,' . , ...... ~~:~Z~. ~~):ftA.~ . .,,- - 18. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to deny PS 83-14 and refer it back to the City Staff. Councilman Kenna stated that this had been a long standing issue within the City, it was a zoning request probably three times denied by the City Staff and Council. Councilman Kenna stated that one of the last major hurdles that the developers had in making this zoning change was an agreement formed between the developer, City and County to improve the street. Councilman Kenna stated that nothing had happened on the street, obtai~ing the easements and the'drainage. Motion carried 6-0 March 14, 1983 Page 10 PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-9, REQUEST 01 FLO~ J. CONNER FOF FINAL PLAT OF LOT ~ BLOCK 2, COLLEGE CIRCLE SHOPPING CENTER ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE N9RTHEAST CORNER 01 COLLEGE CIRCLE A1~ RUSS ROAD) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING .PS 83-12, REQUEST OF FENIMORE, DUKE AND BAILEY FOR FINAL PLAT OF PARKRIDGE ESTATES(LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE, BOUNDED ON THE WES BY FOSSIL CREEK TRAILS .ADDITION) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING PS -'83-14, REQUEST OF CROSS ROADS DEVELOPMENT FOR FINAL PLAT OF BLOC 8-R, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PROPOSED MEADOW CREST DRIVE) APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING PS 83-14, REQUEST OF AUBREY BROTHERS FOR FINAL PLAT OF FLAMINGO ESTATES (LOCATED EAST OF 7300 BLOCK) DENIED-REFERRED TO STAFF Page 4 ~ P & Z Minutes February 24, 1983 Q~_- , ~7, -"~:1~ . ,,"~'~;' \ (":. ' . and item #5 has not been required but he will have this done prior to council. Mr. Hannon asked Mr. size of the meter would necessarily be the 1~ inch size, would be determined by their need PS 83-13 APRROVED Mr. 'onstad said that was correct. He d he had discussed this with Mr. Stembridge earlier. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 83-13 sµbject to the Engineer's comments with the exception of item #2 and a clarification on item #4, that the developer will work with the City Staff to provide appropriately sized water meters at all locations. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 6. PS 83-14 Request of Aubrey Brothers for final plat of Flamingo" Estates. (.. \:::. . . - - - - Dick Perkins, Consulting Engineer for Teague Nall and Perkins, came forward to represent Mr. Brothers. He said they had received the City Engineer's letters. Mr. Perkins said the Commission agreed previously that Flamingo Estates would be sufficient for the name of this subdivision. He said they will fully execute the dedication prior to the filing of the plat. Mr. Perkins said he felt they would have no problem with obtaining a permit from the Trinity River Authority since that is a recognized point of entry'. He said they were in agreement with getting a permit from TP & L. Mr. Perkins said he sees no problem with item #4. He said he has not yet done this~ but they are working with Mr. Barfield~ the owner of the adjacent property, to get ·this taken care of. Mr. Perkins said he sees no problem'with item #5, the only thing, Mr. Albin is requesting they use ductile iron pipe in the trenches. He said with the creek flowing the way it does, he would like to be allowed to use this only where needed, to allow flexibility. Pa ge 5 Š.:; p & Z Minutes ~ February 24, 1983 Æi~ ~ (. Mr. Hannon asked about comment #4 in the City Engineer's letter-regarding the . reference to using an invalue point of .010. He said our Subdivision Ordinance requires the use of .013~ which is the Health Department Standards, unless there has been a change that he is not aware of. Mr. Perkins said Mr. Albin was allo~ing them the .010 factor because of the utilization of PVC pipe~ He said he believes the .013 relates to the clay pipe. Mr. Hannon asked if it had been approved by the Health Department and had other cities approved its use. Mr. Perkins said he was sure it has been. He said they had just designed a project for the City of Hurst and were able to use a . 009 . ce ~- :..- Mr. Bowen stated the Commission has a letter from- the Director of Public Works/ Utilities, ßene Riddle, regarding the off- site easemehts. Mr. .Bowen asked if they had obtained them. Mr. Perkins said they have been working with Mr. Long in getting an approved alignment through Mr. Barfield's property. He said the problem they are having is they have not tied down the exact location, of drainage channels, streets, ,.etc. within their subdivision. Mr. Perkins said the last time he talked with Mr. Long, they had only drawn up a rough graph of the subdivision. He said what he plans to get ;s a 10 foot utility easement within the proposed street R.O.W. or a channel easement. Mr. Perkins said they are aware they can not begin construction until this is worked out to the city's specifications. He said if they get approval of ',this plat tonight, they will get with Mr. Long and try to tie down the align- ment. He said he feels the alignment would only vary from one inch to one foot. . Chairman Tucker asked about the storm water discharge. Page 6 ~~ P & Z Minutes February 24, 1983 ~. PS 83-14 APPROV ED (-.. ''-'.-' - 7. PS 83-15 PS 83-15 APPROVED 8. PS 83-17 6Þ;,~ ~~,; Mr. Perkins said the storm water discharge affects two property owners, one belng Mr. Barfield. He said they know they will have to get these easements before starting construction. Mr. Hannon reminded the Commission of their stipulations in approving the preliminary plat of this project. Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 83-14 subject to the Engineerls comments with the exception of the name change in item #I-A, further subject to obtaining easements of the off-site sewer and a~proval for any plan revisions for said off-site sewer, further subject to the Developer paying to the city the sum of $12,000 upon approval of the plat, denial of access to adjacent property until that property is platted through to Precinct Line Road and the erection of barricades at the ends of the streets on the east side of the property. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Midwest Federal Savings-and Loan for. replat of Lot A-R, Calloway,A Delbert Stembridge, Consulting came forward to represent t property. He said they received the City Eng;~eer's co s and have complied with them. e the motion to approve PS 83-15 o the Engineer's comments. This m n was s~conded by Ms. Nash and the otion carried 5-0. Request of Bankers Life of Nebraska for final plat of Lot 3, Block 5~ Richland Oaks Addi tion. Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent the owner. He said they had received the City Engineer's comments and they will meet all his require- ments. . , . ". ~~.,:.~.~~ ,:to ;--;, t;. 'i"'~.~;:~ ~~ ~., KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas February 24, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-945, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, FLAMINGO ESTATES (EDEN ADDITION), OFFSITE SEWER LINE PLANS, PS 83-14 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We have received sheets 5 through 7 of the Water, Sewer, and Storm Drainage Plans showing the proposed off-site sanitary sewer line as we requested in Item 3 of our letter dated February 16, 1983. A IIPoint of Service" permit should be obtained from the Trinity River Authority for connection to the TRA 30" sewer main at Precinct Line Road. 2. . 3. A written permit from Texas Power and Light Company should be obtained for crossing their easement. ~ Copies of all other ease- ments required for construction and maintenance of the off-site sewer line should be furnished to the City. 4. We have analyzed the capacity requirements for the off-site sanitary sewer main in accordance with City criteria, as shown in the attached calculations, and we would offer the following changes to the developer proposed pipe sizes: SEWER PROPOSED PROPOSED CAPACITY REQU IR ED RECOMM. . CAPACITY STATION GRADE SIZE PROVIDED CAPACITY SIZE PROVIDED ( FE ET) (%) ( I NC H ) (MGD) (MGD) ( IN) (MGD) 0+00 4+00 1.15 10 1.97 1.52 10 1.97 7+36 0.80 10 1.65 1.51 10 1.65 11+ 72 0.80 8 0.91 1.50 10 1.65 15+65 1.08 8 1.05 1.44 10 1.91 18+49 1.72 8 1.33 1.39 10 2.41 22+09 0.80 8 0.91 1.33 10 1.65 26+ 79 0.80 6 0.42 1.14 10 1.65 . The capacity calculations tabulated above assume a Manning's roughness coefficient of 0.010 for PVC pipe. Changes in the proposed grades will change the pipe capacities shown. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 . . . .. . ~' ~:,~;"\. '. -~:..:-.....; ~", ;', ·,··P .~.: ~ ~'-,......, ~,\,',J;¡' .. "--'" Page 2, Planning & Zoning Commission, February 24, 1983 5. Due to the very deep trench cuts throughout a large part of this project, we would recommend that ductile iron pipe be substituted for PVC pipe in areas where the trench cut exceeds 20 feet. Also ductile iron pipe should be used under all creek crossings. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, . please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works - ~~ ~-~--J-~,:,_.~- ~.'--~- ¡ -~,' _.~-J :," ~,_~~~" .,. :,'". ~ " ! '.. . ! . --K~O~~L ToiEN~LlS~-FLÔwEdt~=r~c. ¡q=I~·-·-f>j.-=-~-~--- H___.___ .... ---- tON~UL1~IN~ ENCI~-~~RS~;-;~~ w~~"J;aJlk-; T·~ ·-rJT-·-m·--.--: - ~_.---- ....--- ..~- . L ¡ ~h~--.:-_~!; : : j !:--~~.-L-L_t-: _ __.. _____._ .-.---.~-- ____.s étJ..J..£-.ß._____~ e !?-Fer¿.f€)2i_1-./{£.{Jfß5 ~D.____ pg-A/l::!6. b.g;__ .... _ .__... ____~_--__ - .J---c--- S7ArtP.N~.._J_ªLZ.E":_~._~.~¢A!D~-l-LAÆç:-,4 ; S£K~P_~__....; i ,,: r' . í I j ;: I '. I i ,. i:· I'! I I !: . ~-~-_~ho.iº-º-_j~~_-jT__II-1-L-! I ! ! ' II' ¡ i . 'i _ t ~ . : .. . , lYd I~ ¡ . II.' Z: ' , ¡' -----.Li.-___ .:__j_~_____yo_ . .j ¡ _dS, -~-i-n; t _g i 8-nAiC./Z_é;?__. .u· .___.____ '. '?..J. , .!!, i", . I: ;:. '. . , !! G. 7 00 ¡ : I ;: Ii!, :!, I!: :: : -,--.-¡_.._~- ;.-.-. -. I / 0 ¡ II' I ! ! / I' / ~ /t; I I: I -- ~ ---. .~ il I:: if , i ; :3 I ~ ! I I H· '0 I ., ."f): 01 (). j -t---+-, ì ¡! I' !!, I ~,t!) 1 ! ...,.--,.. ~ '" ¡--:--. I () I ~ ! ;. i . . ..-î~--l!-i~ : ;,0 t¡ð~ () . ::r; /5 A¡-C.eéS I : I ¡, I I 'I' Î! 1: . I ;. t ! 8 ~ .-t-.~~-:-~- -~~--r-'-'.'-~ . ' ~ í . t . ¡ ¡ '2 Z f;o 8 A c,z.c5 ! i I .-.._;--+._-'~'~- I 1 :Acee-s ' l' ---,.-. ¡ I~ ,'1 · ! .2'fi70 I.'.! ¡ ¡ ! ··~---,i ~- ¡J-í ¡ ¡·l- I ! j J! -I· i .::57~7)()¡J j q rb>O: rD! .s 7A " ;'0-0:.;. i I ; ; · '_..t/!. .¡ ; ¡ 1 -! ':-I!:. I I ,-!-t---~~ j '.' 7/ , . ; J? U L £5: I v:?e6u¿~ Tlo¡.}¡..5' l: ¡PO,¿ /IC /;,€5 ~" /~£) :, ;::',e, 0' Cð:Þ¿''¿6,- S,',' :, " : ---..----------- --'-----'--t-1--~--1· ~, ~, --, ,---r---:------,---,-r-=¡--~'-..-~. . ',....., .: ' , 'A~: ~, j . ' ; ¡ ¡ ¡ I' I ;! ¡; ¡ i ¡ ¡ . -=-. · I.;,-fl íER../ "': -1! . I , : ---1 ;:: I : ¡: ::! ;_._~__ t~~~ ! :!, 5øwe-.e ¡ S/ze.ð: Tð ..5 t?~(/t? '¡'"Vc::7.!. P/ZA i/./A~ i . __.L~-.~-_--~j----J-J_J. J-+---.~k_€~ i_~ ~.ßVc,í ~-G-i.Ç.~C-LffCíJX!~-.-~~J~~~¿-~~-- . ':. i' ¡ ; i z, LJSJVME 19,s ~EO¡PL£ /At:.cl;-· ; · i : . ; -~.--,. ~--..-. -..·-!--,----i-~·~~j/~, 5E{/v~¡( .. F~1v)- ;~/~ti- ;¡~- )--;'rl~µ~ .-.-----...... ...-... ... - ----r· "--~....-._-+ .-;-..-........ -~-.. r-----···---t-~-..a;--...---L-..-~ __...~._ ¡ ~I ?EI1 ~//JC !¡C"AC,¡(;~':- ¡ / f- ¡if- ¡ . . - · ----.-.--- . · ---!~ . ¡ ! '--LW-J._~.~.~ ¢ r (y ~__.__~_ ..--.... . -~--,----J~~~_.~/ !iF/~!~ðT/~/1:, /540 d~/A_q#'~PAX.-;-__~___ ¡ .; : J i ; . I ! . . I I : ·--~--1·-'-·u Z07ÅL~-Po,P.--JE¡fviD-;~· r ~,-S-;c!:~-)~-71~I'~--x--~/t ,,~c)'~s¡:-, 3: 0;;"/ --7--+----~-=-- :-4!·, I : ,~-- ! !. .~; I -~---.~-~--+--_.- --'-II: --.-.. t'~6 ~!J!~~£/I C¿P£. =- . Ij¡+ ·_.~/1- -~... :._.-:..~.¿, 1- 1- : i~-l---:--..--_. . " I... '4 r: : .: " . -~}!:?::_..: ·--~----··t-----~-·- -1 f .3lðf/ : . -i-~---:t.. -(1o/]T,-)-- '6y,.l R.~A _SU~JE.Çk_ ..uL ·"7--~---:.--t_L- - ·-·--i . --_u_~-.._-,-r+- ..JOB NOl_~~_î1:.~._ ÐATE,-~·· .__...i_E? A M j ;J (; ~_~.;$...rAL~ 5; :. ---.-f--.-'-----.c ; -cmNT;-:--L,--15, LJ '._--:__ 2 - 2. 3 ~ 8 3 ._--ºEß.: _$~r.£_.$_EYl_£~~ P~f..~TÍ- ~~~u If{fl/EIJ/ s._ --c-. _!.';'.~~__ ! ' L _. .,---- ey, RwA.._.- _SU8~EC1;~__~_____ , ÐAT£;~-~23~i'3' .- ~_~-fW,éR- -4IfPfi_C/CY_ .----------- ~~~-...::"'.---1 1 I _~_¡.::':::::.---- 1____.__.-0 _~~._ ' '. " ,.~.... , I ,; f,L..... ---i ,. -_.~'- i~~-·.~_o --R~-~l TO -ENtl~si-ÞlOW~~~INC~~~---:· /, "Lj___ .--- . ! ·-c~~~Li~N·~E~~I~~~j-;:k~~~a'~s-¡- T---ì~! . . I --- - ¡------ --..":',1 ::j,: 'LLL¡;! ""1 ': :. · · i ;'!!.' .!: : ¡ , ¡ ; .:; :' - ,-- - .-------.--- ----T--;----· . .,.. -l- " . '. ~ . .. . ··---t·-·--- 1)~~(~__~_~_E'p Î ~-~4::9 {-:-~4e~(qT¿'.-t~JI?~c~~~·'~. ß ;,_f£--·- - '-----L-_.. ,=..: / ¡---.lL~--L-~~J---i-l.i{~_J.. " .__ __: ' ¡ , : ¡ í : ; ; I : ! ~ : 'I , " : CI I : I I ::, : i :! ; ¡:: i ¡ ;!!! ,. · . i · ! : /AJF~7Z?_A_T;~ = 1 LS~ ð¡~_~~(~~r~.Ld4--)tl;__~/~~~g_~~__._1 i : ' ! ! ¡ : ! I 1. ! ~ 27 Job ! ~¡ /~¡ . : ; ! t !: : ·_~--;----._l___L_._.. . J_~~ I".. --r~'-/--'-_' . .. . _.__, _. .._. _._,,_,,_._ ' ¡ ¡ : i ! : · ¡ ! i ; ¡ I ¡ (¡ I ¡ I ¡ ! i I: .; ----r-r-~-TA¿ ;Oé$/GJ F¿:{)d.J ~ I' ok ~ izl¢. ¡ fl 4-77 ¡oJ. 0'------ . ¡; I ¡ I ¡ i I ; ~ ! ~ ¡ ; I : . i! ,,¡! ¡ ! ¡ : I I I. 1 I ~ i '~TT ~~._.+ ! ¡ I . j ~~¿1o;fþ¡_K~ {i~ '--'---. , ' " I ¡ · ; , :~~~'; : ' : ;/1 " !" ~ .! : ! : , : : - '·;~~-T-·LP ¡~·~f~-!---f?+-{'-/¡S- -"-~-f~:PlCrT~ !.: I. AßtJ(/T r·~.f-?~/I1~¡)·t./'Õ.k , ;, . ! !; t ! '! i !; f, , ¡ -- I I r---T--¡ S7itTytJ0 S7/!,i l//lf7) I I .¡ . "!".', . I ' ~. OE~/6L ' ;-Lb =, ~$Jb/Ðl/~ðY(3- J~2 f )sJqß).S;Ì :--j-~- i ___~ ¡ , I j ¡ i Ii! :, · i ;., I ; : I 1-4¡- i /- ; , ! ii' . ! = ¡ ~;ð ¡ ~ ~þ ¡ , I ¡ . I rt ¡. -+ _l-~_-.J_J '.: ¡ LJ ¡ ! L . ¡ I·j I ¡ !-J-!-!' . !_____ ~---~.8~~ cLu-j·ªF _Lp~' @ i é? t r2%, =j ! /, ~ 7! ~G p. 11!~ ¿ 0 W . -.~~~ ¡ ~~-1/NFj J/Zé ¡ ßEQ1b ,/1 ¡ Ao 1// ~; ~j2~~ !--l ~-J- -j===t~_~___±±__, ;~~.~o~~Æ~Zij_ ;_l~t__~ ----. ..--.--- .. S 7Æ.T/o/~__ .11, ¡L Z/-_.2]?j--S.IA_,~__ ~ 21 0 8 _J ____..____._._.~.-....---.--.--~-- _ , ¡: ; , i . ! ' 9- ~ C[ Z 7 , )1f.!~l(3, ,1..7/0-.1- LS 0 ~L? 7~j.J. -1._._~..- f ~ ; it' : ¡ ;. , ..-" ""'..' ,--,.. ._, -_. '.... ,- _._'-'~-,-+.._- -----1-._.__: -__1...._,.._........ .. __ __,___.., , ..,___ _____ 1 ' ! z: /1'[33 t??e-p i ! ~ - ì" ---.. -----, -,.' , '--.-..--.-.-...- ,-- i -...~-~ - -r ----.-.- -,. -... -., - . " , .., -- , " I I, ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡. "! . . . ' J, II r::::; ¡ Z ()' / . -tJi . · · i . . L IN;¿-- s/?€¡...ß.~G ~ V S , :8.1 ! '- ¡ I 0 : ¢__ ___.__~ _._ -. . ~~~~--~.. .--- : I ~~_:-J-~-~-----i~-:-~~4,'-- -. ---..-.- u~~~;;;.: .- " -- . - --- -. ; - ---+~..¿ I L! 1-·----- ---!-~--.- -.4 ð r r-r - -._--. ¡ ¡ I ~'~ ¡ . i ~ ""1'1 ¡ : I ' , ---j' .--. ----++=' '- ...Jo.~~o: - ~, -~-715- ~ o· : ,~---- ; --CUE~~" !... -..--~ ;, ;. I iJ. . ! . -....J____..J2 E<$.L~/J __ F.L.<2~ty · = i ------.- =-~'-:.~~~ - .=~i~j~-~í~r--i : i--I 1__ ¡' :-=' ..!P~ _; r --.-. ~-Ls---·--- ..~~~._- . .-~KJ~'lO.W1T_O~EN.G_LjSH-FlOWE.RS: 'INC. ¡ L.____~'.. ~--_=== i_._ · CONSUL TING ENGINE~RS/ FO~ W~rth~Dall~s: : l: : I ¡ ~.;;::.;. ! ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ . ¡ I ¡ !. : I ¡ i ¡ i ¡ ¡ ! I : ¡ ¡ . -~I ---- - - -..-.--- -+-..~.----~-'- .'. -L '. . ..l.....-J ---J__. . ~~~~~.._l~-~_~~-~~l_~~~_~~~__J~____~· ~~ .-~~ ; · ~ · j : L" i , ¡ 1--;----·- -.-.------ !;::-~-~W :: ~~ -T zj /a o! f- :;$0 0 _23~·.'~-·- ¡ ¡ I I ¡, t :, I I' /¡, !' '-L ~ ¡ ¡ i ~j :2 i ~ 4 Iu-~ ---- ---~-! :! t-ti I-~--- ! ¡ I ; I ~-.-..--..--.~---.-.- ~·T-;¿~I )~: 5/ it?" I ec~ I Ð II ~ i TIi 'I: J I q ~ 7 VJ:-- i-' ¡ t; ¡ill': iIÓ " i i A' OY· \ t+ ¡ :'rV¿! , }~¡~ ¡ ~ I~', ~ ~'____H. '! P ! I ! ¡ ¡'; ! ¡; ¡ I ¡ . I : I ; . ¡ ~--l-f , I i ¡ i ! ¡ t t - ... _...-.+......._~-~ ! ~ I ! . I f , r :___ I . . .;...----,-.--..,. -, -.'-, I I i I ¡ ¡ ~ ~---t'----- ~ 0 µ: C L d ~ I () /J I I ! I g~c..d.mmE¡U¡) . : ¡ I i ; .-.-.-., ¡-¿-fj-.sr 2 f i ! ~ ¡ . .--- -~ ---"~--~ ,--- . , I : 1 ¡ ! ~ , . ¡ :.5Ewg¡¿r t ?J2p;POJED j /n/'/'J/Ml!/t1 ----TT~-----··rS;.A 1/~Nr' 1sA2.. € ¡ i ! G,./ZA-pk ' ---- ----;--:. ~.: -----+ ¡ - L : ¡ ¡ ¡ · i ¡ , , ! 0 ¡.J t:J () 1=1 . !' ¡-- I' I! . -~·-·l- ..- . i ~_Il, . , --- ---t;;;;;~~---~_._----~--~ I __I Ie.. .;,':.': {} I fd-~ ¡. šê ; : ": i Z· ) ~ 1", ! ! j ¡ t I -=-; ! 1 r (.;' ~ f ! : : ! I ! ! ,ì I ! . J I 0/ ,I "þ' ¡ ì ---.-, II,'-! 7 : I~--+i / 0: ¡--r- LL ..-O~1~-·---·~--r~¡.?.:':-4~---- '-_=1 --, ~·--.--.:=T2.2:~l~-1--: .- :_~t~-¡ --~J=r o. g~i~ ~~~33ß:~ ~-:~~.__ __ '-- ;'. .' ': ¿£ Z : . -.·--t---...---; . ! ¡ , : ~o ¡ , ! LOI--~-æ'_~-W/_~lt. ,~bD.--- . --.-: .-.-- . --- Z-"-_-é_28_~.L_L_.J_._~U_: " -~-L-~--.i~______ ¡ ¡, I ': I . r. ! .--. 1-- --- . -.. --.---- ¡ __-l~ -___.__1.._ I -'---:! !,' ! ,___!U{)/{;Ç>: 1__~l]Ic0'; ,L¡/X: . O()~¡-Ié:iç~.A~,=?,_---:-, __, , ___ ' ., 1=6,4S<f~ 'o~/: ~::::-__4,o/3~~tlrl-1~._.._ '-~~-.,::~-:. - -.-~-- !: ~~~v~e: Ff;=//JCf-~,cp~rt0= _Ç-{__~-LD ----- . R A . ' I, 'I:,: I' i· ¡·I. 3 - c¡ Á'~ u'·--i ,w___.. .-s~:i._~Is:Þ~~,- ~R.,--I~C-ALA d I ~,:,l :1,-- ¡ ~T-t+,· i, .:;::Oi-_r~-_~.-=~, 'DATE,-T-'--- :. I : ; , I : ; ¡ I; :!: --l-l- ., XJ ¡¿If' __"¡-Z3.... ~3 .: I~~ . : ! -'-_.-.--.~----':'-~------c------.:-- ,....... .. :-::'~..':~~:. ......... . ....... , ..-10.-_ .. -- --- ¡ £; ¿-sic, IJ ¡ ~_~'_..__~=-_____ I ! ¡FloW I - I ¡ n__.' , ' I ! I / ' -,' . ~ . ,; , " : ; :' " : . I ~.) _ , -1-'2--52-01& j)---:--~- ! -t~-'-:-----~~f ,~- . . . -r @.;.-:.... . ~." ' ';~:;l ~J.~j"" ""-;, ,'J --:-.~ KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas February 16, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-945, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, FLAMINGO ESTATES (EDEN ADDITION), FINAL PLANS, PS 83-14, GRID 53, 62 We have rèviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would refer you to our review letter dated January 10, 1983, regarding the following items: a. b. Item 1- - Subdivision name change to Eden Addition suggestion. Item 2 - 1-12 lot building setbacks. Item 3 - Stonnwater discharge letters. Item 5 - Water line pro rata. c. d. 2. The Owner's Acknowl edgement and Dedi cati on Statement along wi th Notary Certification on the plat should be fully executed before approval. 3. Sheets 5 through 7 of the Water, Sewer, and Storm Drainage Plans which show the proposed off-site sanitary sewer were not included in our review materials. We would request that we have an opportunity to review plans for the off-site sewer before your approval of this development. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen ~ronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 . . . ~ (~~ . ,~ "'.' '1 '-~ð KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas Janua ry 10, 1983 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-945, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, FLAMINGO ESTATES (EDEN ADDITION), PRELIMINARY PLAT, PS 83-4, GRID 53, 62 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would recommend that the proposed name of this subdivision be changed from the Flamingo Estates to the Eden Addition since this development is contiguous with Lot 1, Block 1 of the Eden Addition. 2. We would note that Lots 14-18, Block 1; are IF-12 and all others are IF-9. The building setback 1 ine for IP-12 zoning is 30 feet. : The proposed 25-foot setback on all IF-12 lots should be changed to 30 feet. 3. Easements or letters of pennission should be obtained from Robert White, Kenneth Whitley and George Boring for concentrated stormwater dis- charge on their property from this subdivision, and from any other .adjacent property owners receiving concentrated discharge. 4. We would recommend that the proposed 6-;nch water line in Hialeah Drive be increased to an 8-inch line. 5. The developer should be r~quired to pay his pro rata share of the existing 8-inch water line in Eden Road. We would estimate pro rata at $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of the 8-inch line for a total length of 251.8 feet. 6. We would request that the proposed sanitary sewer manhole no. 4 and line liB" on the east side of Eden Road be moved over to the west side of Eden Road to provide service to the west without having to cut Eden Road later. 550 FiRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-62"· METRO/267-3367 ~. " . . . .~:'1"". " ~~" -t,':.; ~;~~ !~.:~"' .... -' ..,-: , .. .,,..¡:>~.,~ r¡ ;), Page 2, Planning & Zoning, Janaury 10, 1983 7. A plan/profile sheet for the proposed offsite sewer line nAil should accompany the plans, with the size and grade noted. Also the developer's engineer should demonstrate that the proposed offsite line has sufficient capacity to handle the entire drainage area tributary to the sewer system. 8. The developer should be responsible for obtaining an easement for the offsite sanitary sewer line as required by the utility department for construction and maintenance of the line. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. aJ-W( RICHARD W. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works _ HALTOM . RICH LAND AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE P. O. Box 18518 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 (817) 284..1413 Serving Cities of: Haltom City Richland Hills N. Richland Hills Wataug8 .. . -.............._..~-. -. ....- . --..._..~.~'-~...:... ... ~";' ~"."h"" .- .__...._M.-~,. -,..~. ,~ ~ _. ...---- ,----............,... -~.._'...:...._....--.....-*.-.;;:_.. ....-......4·.~'_._.~....._ /s 'I I I j DlC\ 9tHl September 7, 1983 Ms. Jeanette Moore, City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS P.O. Box 18609 Fort Worth, TX 76118 Dear Jeanette: The Haltom Richland Area Chamber of Commerce hereby respectfully requests to be placed on the September 12 agenda of the council meeting for the purpose of peti- tioning a portion of the revenue derived from the hotel/ motel tax. The officers who will be representing the Board of Directors will be: Don Waters, President (President of Northeast National Bank) Robert Deffeyes, Vice President (Graham Magnetics) Jim Saylor, Vice President (Administrator-Glenview Hospital) We would also request an opportunity to discuss our petition in a pre-council session before the public meeting. We take this opportunity to express pride in the tremendous increase in your city permits for the first months of the year. G rtrude Tarpley xecutive Vice President mg ~...-.. 7~."'.· a" :'.~-. .. .. ~A'" .' . . DATE: 9-20-83 If¿; .... .. .......... ~ . -- ... . . -- - ,!:.:-..:..:..~ , .. <;~~ ... ;:;..~ : ..""" . ..~-..~..-. ." "' - ...."'!. . : - . ":.-. .PJEcr :_ . If Industrial 'Waste Ordjn~n~p· DEP AR.TMENT : P~blic·. Works This ordinance is an ordinance that Fort Worth sent to u;·a~kjn~ that we BACKGROUND: - pass this ordinance to comply with the Federal -regulations concerning industrial waste: Ba~k in 1977 we had passed an industrial waste ordi~ance but it" has become obsolete and this ordinance takes its place. : . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve ordinance on Industrial Waste BUDGETED ITEM: ' YES N/ A NO ACCOUNT ~-ruMBER: . /J f /) __________~_~_~___________________ -------------------- ~- -- . e ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING PERMITS TO DISCHARGE INDUSTRIAL WASTE INTO THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: AUTHORIZING, THE DIRECTOR OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WATER DEPARTMENT TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS' PERTAINING TO SUCH PERMITTING, PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS, MAKING THIS ORDINANCE CUMULATIVE OF PRIOR ORDINANCES: REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND PROVISIONS OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH: PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE: PROVIDING A PENALTY: ENGROSSING AND ENROLLING THIS ORDINANCE: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DA TE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS t TEXAS: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS When used in this section, these terms shall be defined as follows: "Abnormal Sewage: Any industrial wastewater having suspended solids of B.D.D. content which is, in the judgement of the Director, significantly in excess of that found in normal sewage, but which is otherwise acceptable into a POTW under the terms of this Ordinance. e "Act: The Clean Water Act (33 V.S.C. 1251 et. seq.), as amended. "Authority: The City of North Richland Hills. "B . o. D. : The quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter under standard laboratory procedure as specified in 'Standard Methods' in five days at twenty (20) degrees Centigrade expressed as parts per million by weight (milligram per litre). "Categorical Pretreatment Standards: National Pretreatment Standards which are established from time to time by EPA which specify quantities or concentrations of pollutants or pollutant properties which may be discharged or introduced into a POTW by specific Industrial Dischargers. "City: City of North Richland Hills, Texas. "Composite Sample; A sample of the wastew~ter discharged to the collection system bya· user an'd composed~of·-.a· series ofnå1:;1èsB than three 's-amples taken during the periods when "industrial wastes are being; disCharged. The period of time over which the samples are 'collected for compositing';iiltò a single sample shall not exceed twenty-four hours . The series of samples may be collected on a time-proportional of flo\t\l-proportional basis. e "Cooling Water: The water discharged from any system of conde11sation such as air conditioning, cooling, refrigeration or water used as a coolant in cooling towers where the only pollutant is thermal. "Director: The Director of the Water Department of the City of North Richland Hills, or his authorized representative. e "Discharger: Any non-residential user who discharges an effluent into a POTW by means of pipes, conduits, pumping stations, force mains, constructed drainage ditches, surface water intercepting ditches, intercepting ditcnes, and all constructed devices and appliances appurtenant thereto. Includes owners and/ or occupants of such premises. "Grab Sample: A single sample of effluent flow taken at any time. "Garbage: Solid waste from domestic or commercial preparation, cooking or dispensing of food or from the handling, storage, and sale of produce. "Indirect Discharge: The discharge or the introduction of nondomestic pollutants from a source regulated under Section 307 (b) or (c) of the Act, into a POTW. "Industrial Waste: Solid, liquid or gaseous waste resulting from any industrial, manufacturing, trade, or business process or from the development, recovery or processing of natural resources. "Interference: The inhibition or disruption of a POTW's sewer system, treatment processes or operations which contributes to a violation of any requirement of its NPDES permit. "Maximum Daily Average: The maximum concentration of a substance allowed in a discharge as determined from a laboratory test of a daily composite sample. e "Maximum Grab: The maximum concentration of a substance allowed in a discharge as determined from a laboratory test of a grab sample. "mg/l: Milligram per litre. "Normal Sewage: Sewage which, when analyzed, shows by weight a daily average of not more than 240 mg/! of suspended solids and not more than 210 mg!! of B.G.D. and which is otherwise acceptable into a POTW under the terms of this Code. "NPDES: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System-permit program of the Environmental Protection Agency. "0 and M: Operation and Maintenance. " Other Wastes: Decayed wood, sawdust, shavings, bark, lime, refuse, ashes, garbage, offal, oil, tar, chemicals and all other substances except sewage and industrial wastes. "Owner or Occupant: The person, firm, or public or private corporation, using the lot, parcel of land, ,building or premises connected to and discharging sewage, industrial wastewater or liquid, into the sanitary sewage system of the City, and who pays, or is legally responsible for the payment of, water rates or charges made against the said lot, parcel of land, building or premises, if connected to the water distrib1.1tion s)Tstem of the CitJ7 of North Richland Hills, or \vho would payor be leg"ally responsible for such payment if so connected. e "Pass Through: The discharge of pollutants through the POTW into navigable waters in quantities or concentrations which are a cause or significantly contribute to a violation of any requirement of the POTW's NPDES permit. "Person: Any individual, business entity, partnership, corporation, governmental agency or political subdivision. e "Permit: Wastewater Discharge Permit', issued to non-domestic dischargers of industrial waste into the sanitary sewerage system of the POTW. "pH: The logarithm of the reciprocal of the weight of hydrogen ions, in grams per litre of solution, measured and calculated in accordance with 'Standard Methods'. n·POTW: Publicly Owned Treatment Works--Any sewage treatment plant and the sewers, watercourses and appurtenances thereto, owned and operated by the Authority. "Pretreatment Standards: Categorical Pretreatment Standards. "Sanitary Sewer: A publicly owned pipe or conduit designed to collect and transport industrial waste and domestic sewage to the POTW. "Sewage: Water-carried human wastes or a combination of water-carried wastes from residences, business buildings, institutions and industrial establishments, together with such ground, surface, storm or other waters as may be present. " Shall: Is mandatory. "Slugload: Any substance released in a discharge at a rate and/or concentration which causes interference to a POTW. e "Standard Methods: 'Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater', a publication prepared and published jointly by the American Public Health Association, American Waterworks Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation, as it may be amended from time to time. "Suspended Solids: Solids that either float on the surface of, or in suspension in, water, sewage or other liquid and which are removable by laboratory filtering. "Unpolluted Water or Waste: Any water or liquid waste containing none of the following: Phenols or other substances to an extent imparting taste and odor in receiving waters; toxic or poisonous substances in suspension colloidal state or solution; noxious or odorous gases; not more than ten thousand (10,000) parts per million, by weight, or dissolved solids, or which not more than twenty-five (hundred (2,500) parts per million are chloride; not more than ten (10) parts per million each of suspended solids and B.O.D.; color not exceeding fifty (50) color units, nor a pH value of less than 5.0 nor higher than 11.0; and/ or any water or waste approved for discharge into a stream or waterway by the appropriate state authority. "Upset: An exceptional incident in which a Discharger unintentionally and temporarily is in.a state ,ofe.noncompliance,'with -the standards established in this ordinance, due to factors beyond the reaSonable control of the Discharger , and excluding noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive mninte11ance, or careless or improper operatio11 thereof. e "Wastewater: Industrial waste, sewag'e or any other VJaste that has been used by and discharged from an industry, commercial enterprise, household or other water C011sumer, including that which may be combined with any ground water, surface water 0t: storm water, that may be discharged to the POTW. Said water may be either polluted or unpolluted. "1. PURPOSE AND POLICY e This Ordinance provides for prohibitions on discharges of certain substances into the public sewer system of the City from all sources, domestic, commer~ial, or industrial. A further purpose of this Ordinance is to set forth uniform requi~ements for Industrial Dischargers into the POTW Authority Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems, and to enable the Authority to protect the public health in conformity with all applicable state and federal laws relating thereto. Parts of this Ordinance are enacted pursuant to regula- tions established by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as set forth in 46 FR 9404-9406. Many of the terms herein above defined correspond to the terminology employed in the EP A Regulations. All categorical pretreatment standards, lists of Toxic Pollutants, Industrial I Categories and other standards and categories which have been or which will be promulgated by the EP A sháll be incorporated as a part of this ordinance, as will EP A e Regulations regarding Sewage Pretreatment established pursuant to the Clean Water Act, and amendment of this ordinance to incorporate such changes shall not be necessary. The authority shall maintain current Standards and Regulations which shall be available for inspection and copying. The objectives of this Ordinance are: (a) To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the Authority wastewater system which will interfere with the normal operation of the system or contaminate the resulting sludge; (b) To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the Authority wastewater system which do not receive adequate treatment in the ~:P'OTW, and which will pass through the system into receiving waters or the atmosphere or which are otherwise incompatible with the sJ1stem; and e (c) To improve the opportunity to recycle or reclaim the wastewater and to dispose öf, recycle or reclaim the sludge generated by the POTW. The regulation of discharges into the Authority wastewater system under this - Ordinance shall be accomplished through the issuance of permits, as specified in Section 5 -herein, and by monitoring and inspection of facilities, according to this Ordinance. The Director shall have the authority to promulgate such administrative regulations as are from time to time necessary for the enforcement of this ordinance. "2. PROHIBITED DISCHARGES (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to discharge or cause to be discharged any polluted water or corrosive waste into any storm drain or watercourse within the City. (b) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged any storm water, ground water, roof runoff, subsurface drainage ór drainage from downspouts, yard drains, yard fountains and ponds, or lawn sprays into any sanitary sewer. Water from swimming pools, unpolluted industrial water, or cooling water from various equipment shall not be discharged into sanitary sewers if an alternate acceptable means of disposal is available. If an alternate acceptable means of disposal is not available, such water may be .scharged into the sanitary sewer by indirect connection whereby such discharge is cooled, if required, and flows into the sanitary sewer at a rate approved by the Director provided that the waste does not contain materials or substances in suspension or solution in violation of the limits prescribed by this Code. (c) No person shall contribute or cause to be discharged, directly or indirectly, into any public sanitary sewer any of the following described substances, materials, waters or waste: (1) Any liquid or vapor having a temperature higher than one hundred fifty degrees (150°) Fahrenheit (65 degrees Centigrade). (2) Any ,water or waste which contains, wax, grease, oil~ plastic or other substance that will solidify,-or become discernibly viscous at temperatures between thirtJT-two degrees (32°) to one hundred fifty degrees (150°) Fahrenheit, thereby _ contributing to the clogging, plugging or otherwise restricti11g the flow of wastewater through the collection system. e e e (3) Flammable or explosive liquid, solid or gas, such as, but not limited to, gasoline, kerosene, benzene, naptha, etc., which by reason of its nature or quantity may be sufficient, either alone or by interaction to cause fire or explosion or may be injurious in any other way to the operation of tþe POTW. (4) Solid or viscous substances in quantities capable of causing obstruction in the flow in sewers or other interference with proper operation of the POTW, such as, but not limited to, ashes, cinders, sand, mud, straw, shavings, metal, glass, rags, feathers, tar, plastics, wood, whole blood, paunch manure, hair and fleshlings, entrails, lime slurry, lime residues, slops, chemical residues, paint residues, or bulk solids. (5) Any garbage that has not been properly comminuted or shredded to such a degree that all particles will be carried freely under the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers, with no particle greater than one-half (1/2) inch in any dimension. (6) Any noxious or malodorous substances which can form a gas which, either singly or by interaction with other wastes, is capable of causing objectionable odors or hazards to lite or form solids in concentrations exceeding limits established in this Ordinance, or creates any other condition deleterious to structures or treatment processes, or requires unusual provisions, attentions or expense to handle such material. (7) Any noxious or malodorous liquids, gases, or solids which either singly or by interaction are' capable of creating a public nuisance or hazard to life or which may prevent entry into the' -sewers for their maintenance and repair. (8) Any substance ,which may cause~the POTW's effluent or treatment residues, sludges, or scums, to be unsuitable for reclamation and reuse or to interfere with the reclamation process. In no case, shall a substance discharged to the POTW cause the POTW to be, in noncompliance with sludge use or disposal criteria, guidelines or regulations developed under Section 405 of the Act or any cri teria, -- guidelines, or regulations affecting sludge use or disposal developed pursuant to the Solid _aste Disposal Act, the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, or State standards applicable to the sludge management method being used. (9) Any substance which will cause the POTW to violate its NPDES and/or other Disposal System Permits. (10) Any substance with objectionable color not removed in the treatment process, such as, but not limited to, dye wastes and vegetable tanning solutions. (11) Any slugload, which shall mean any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (B. O. D., etc.), relèased in a single extraordinary discharge episode of such volume or strength as to cause interference to the POTW. (12) Any wastewater which causes a hazard to human life or creates a public nuisance. (d) No person shall contribute or cause to be discharged, directly or indirectly, 4tnto any sanitary sewer any of the following in excess of the concentrations prescribed herein: (1) Free or emulsified oil and grease exceeding 100 mg/1 of either or both, or combinations thereof. The authority may allow wastewater discharges containing free or emulsified oil and grease up to 200 mg/l providing the authority can determine that the oil and grease: a) derives from animal or vegetable materials, b) biodegrades readily in the POTW, and c) does not cause an obstruction of flow in the sewer line. (2) Acids or alkalies capable of causing damage to sewage disposal structures or personnel or having a pH value lower than 5.0 or higher than 11.0. (3) :Salts ,oía heavy fi1etal in solu~iQ~'orsuspension, aI1d organics, in concentrations exceeding the following, or elements which will damage collections facilities or are detrimental to treatment processes: e Maximum Maximum Daily Average (mg/!) Grab (mg/1) e Chromium as Cr 5.0 15.0 Copper as Cu 3.0 9.0 Zinc as Zn 5.0 15.0 Nickel as Ni 2.0 6.0 Cadmium 0.3 0.9 Arsenic - 0.1 0.3 Barium 2.0 6.0 Boron 1.0 3.0 Lead 3.0 9.0 Manganese 5.0 15.0 Mercury 0.01 0.03 Selenium 0.05 0.15 Silver 0.5 1.5 (4) Cyanide of cyanogen (as Cn) compounds in excess of 2. 0 parts per million by weight. (5) Any water or waste that contains more than ten (10) parts per million of the following gases: Hydrogen sulfide, sulphur dioxide or nitrous oxide. (6) Any wastewater containing any radioactive wastes or isotopes of such halflife or concentration as exceed limits established by the Authority in compliance e with applicable State or Federal regulations. (7) Any wastewater containing toxic pollutants in sufficient quantity, either singly or by interaction to injure or interfere with any wastewater treatment process, constitute a hazard to humans or animals, or to exceed the limitation set forth in the National Categorical Pretreatment Standards List of Toxic Pollutants, set forth in the Code of Federal ~egulations, 40 CFR, Part 403, Appendix B, which List, and all amendments to such list as may be made from time to time, are made a part of this Ordinance. (8) Any wastewater having a temperature which will inhibit biological activity in the POTW treatment plant resulting in interference; but in no case, wastewater with a temperature which exceeds 40°C (1-04°P) at the time of introduction into the POT\V treatment plant. - "3. SPECIAL RULES RELA TING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES (a) Compliance With Standards (1) State requirements and limitations on discharges to the POTW shall be met e by all Discharges which are subject to. such standards in any instance in which they are more stringent than federal requirements and limitations or those in this or any other applicable ordinance. (2) No Discharger shall increase the use of potable or process water in any way, for the purpose of diluting a discharge as a partial or complete substitute for adequate treatment to achieve compliance with the standards set forth in the Ordinance. The Authority may impose mass 'limitations on Dischargers where the imposition of mass liIIiitations is deemed appropriate. (b) Accidental Discharges Each Discharger shall provide protection from accidental discharge of prohibited or regulated materials or substances established by this Ordinance. Where necessary, facilities to prevent accidental discharge of prohibited materials shall be provided and enaintained at the Discharger's cost and expense. When applicable, detailed plans showing facilities and operating procedures to provide this protection shall be submitted to the Authority for review, and shall be approved by the Authority before construction of the facility. Each existing Discharger as designated by the Authority shall complete its plan and submit same to the Authority by January 1, 1984. No designated discharger who discharges to the POTW after the aforesaid date shall be permitted to introduce pollutants into the system until Accidental Discharge Protection Procedures have been approved by the Authority. Review and approval of such plans and operating procedures by the Authority shall not relieve the pischarger from the responsibility to modify its facility as necessary to meet the requireme~ts of this Ordinance. Dischargers shall notify the Authority., immediately Up011 the occurrence of a "S]1.1gH or accidental discharge of substances prohibited by this Ordinance. The notification shall include location of discharge, date and time thereof, type of v~Taste, -concentration and volume. and corrective actions. Any Discharger who discharges slugs of prohibited materials shall be liable for any expense, loss or damage to the POTW, in -- addition to the amount of any fines imposed on the Authority on account thereof under -state or Federal law. Each employer shall instruct all applicable employees, who may cause or discover such a discharge, with respect to emergency notification procedure including the. proper telephone number and/or extension number of the Authority to be notified. (c) Wastewater Discharges Into Private Sewer Systems All dischargers who discharge wastewater into a private sewer system shall co~ply with this ordinance including Section 5. a. (7); provided, however, that flow measurement may be based on metered water consumption. Each discharger shall provide an agreement, signed by the owner of the sewer system, which authorized the Authority's personnel to enter onto the owner's property for purposes of inspection and monitoring of discharger's premises, and for enforcement pursuant to the terms of this ordinance. "4. ADMINISTRATION BY PERMIT _ (a) Classification of Dischargers and Permits (1) All non-domestic users which discharge into the sanitary sewer system of the Authority shall be grouped according to the following definitions: Group I - Major and Significant Industries Industries that discharge a significant quantity of regulated pollutants. Group II - Classed Industries Industries, such as car washes, printers and photographic developers, which can be classed according to the character of their wastewater, and which may discharge regulated pollutants. Group III - Commercial Facilities and. Small Industrial Users Those facilities which do not discharge a significant amount of regulated pollutants 011 a regular basis. e e e - Group IV - Wastewater Haulers The Authority shall promulgate regulations pertaining to the permitting of all transporters of industrial waste desiring to discharge such transported industrial wastes into the Authority's Sanitary Sewage System, or its tributaries, as necessary to adequately protect the POTW and its operations from injurious effects resulting from the acceptance into that system of the transported industrial wastes. Group III and Group IV users industries shall be exempt from the following portions of this ordinance: Sections 5a(2) through 5(e) Sections 6(a) through 6(e) Sections 7 (a) through 7 (c) provided, however, that Group III and Group IV users are subject also to the following conditions: The industrial waste discharged or deposited into the sanitary sewers by a Group III or Group IV user shall be subject to periodic inspection and sampling as often as may be deemed necessary by the Authority. Samples shall be collected in such manner as to be representative of the character and concentration of the waste under operational conditions. The laboratory methods used in the examination of said waste shall be those set forth in Standard Methods, and 40 CFR Part 136. The determination of the character and concentration of industrial waste shall be made by the Authority at such times and on such schedules as may be established by the Authority. Should an owner 'or occupant discharging industrial waste to the sanitary sewers desire a determination, of the quality ·of such industrial waste be made at some time otner than that scheduled by the Authority, such special determination may be maàe by the Authority at the expense of t]1e oVvner or occupant discharging the waste. e e e (2) All Group I and Group II Dischargers shall submit a Wastewater Discharge Permit Application to the Water Department, the form for which shall be provided by the Department. In the case of existing Dischargers who hav~ not already complied with this section, such Application must be submitted within 180 days of the effective date of this Ordinance. (3) No Group I or II user shall be permitted to discharge unless and until it has submitted a completed Wastewater Discharge Permit Application in accordance with (2) above. (4) The Authority will evaluate the completed Applications and data furnished b.y the Discharger and may require additional information. The Authority will determine to what Group each Applicant will be assigned. Within 30 days after evaluation of the Application, a Wastewater Discharge Permit shall be issued, subject to the terms and conditions specified herein; and to the regulations of the Water Department. (5) If the Application is denied, the Applicant shall be notified in writing within 30 days of the reasons for such denial. If denial is based on the Authority's determination that the Applicant cannot meet the Pretreatment Standards specified in this Ordinance, it may specify that additional pretreatment operations will be required of Applicant. (6) Where additional pretreatment and/ or operation and maintenance activities will be required to comply with this Ordinance, pursuant to (5), above, the Discharger shall provide a declaration of the shortest schedule by which the Discharger will provide such additional pretreatment and/ or implementation of additional operational and maintenance activities. (i) The schedule shall contain milestone dates for the commencement and completion of major events leadi11g to the construction and operation of additional pretreatment required for the Discharger to comply with the requirements of this Ordinance including, but not limited to dates relating to · ' e e e hiring an engineer, completing preliminary plans, completing final plans, executing contract for major components, commencing construction, completing construction, and all other acts necessary to achieve compliance with this Ordinance. (ii) The time increments between milestone dates established shall be the shortest practicable for the completion of the required work. Under no circumstances shall the Authority permit a time increment for a single step in the compliance schedule to exceed nine (9) months. The completion date in this schedule shall not be later than the compliance date established for applicable categorical pretreatment standards. (ill) Not later than 14 days following each milestone date in the schedule and the final date for compliance, the Discharger shall submit a progress report to the Authority, including no less than a statement as to whether or not it complied with the increment of progress represented by the milestone date and, if not, the date on which it expects to comply with this increment of progress, the reason for delay, and the steps being taken by the Discharger to return the construction to the approved schedule. In no event shall more than 9 months elapse between such progress reports to the Authority. (7) Unless exempted by the Authority, all Group I and Group II Dischargers shall provide monitoring facilities prior to approval of a permit application, to allow inspection, sampling and flow measurement at each discharge point. Each monitoring facility shall be located on the Discharger's premises; except in the case where such location would be impractical or cause undue hardship to the Discharger, the Authority may approve the placement of"'monitoring facilities in the public street or sidewalk area. All monitoring equipme11t:and facilities shall be maintained in a safe and proper operating conditiol1 at the expense of the Discharger. Failure to prov"'ide proper monitoring facilities s}1all be grounds for denial of a permit application. · . (b) Permit Conditions Wastewater Discharge Permits issued'shall include as applicable, but shall not be e limited to, the following information: (1) Limits on the average and maximum amount of certain wastewater constituents to be discharged; (2) Limits on average and maximum rate and time of discharge and/or requirements for flow regulations and equalization; (3) Requirements for installation and maintenance of inspection and sampling facilities; (4) Location of approved discharge points; (5) Additional conditions as the Authority may reasonable require under - particular circumstances, applying to the monitoring of a given discharge, including sampling locations, frequency of sampling, number, types, and standards for tests, laboratory analysis method, and reporting schedule; - (6) Compliance schedules; (7) Requirements for submission of special technical reports or discharge reports where same differ from those prescribed by this Ordinance. (8) Duration of Permit; (9) Limitation on Permit Transfer: Wastewater Discharge Permits are issued to a specific Discharger for specific operation and are not assignable to another Discharger of transferable to any other location without the prior written approval of the Authority. (c) Reporting Requirements for Discharger (1) Baseline Report: Within 180 days following the effective date for applicable Pretreatment Standards set forth in this Ordinance or prior to commencement of the introduction of wastewater into the POT\\7 by a New e Discharger, and ,Discharger subject to a Categorical Pretreatment Standard shall submit to the Authority a report (in a form provided by the Authority), e indicating the nature and concentration of all prohibited or regulated substances contained in its discharge,. and the average and maximum daily flow in gallons. The report from existing Dischargers shall state whether the applicable Categorical Pretreatment Standards are being met on a consistent basis and, if not, what additional O&M and/or pretreatment is nece'ssary to bring the Discharger into compliance with the applicable Categorical Pretreatment Standards. This statement shall be signed by an authorized representative of the Discharger, and certified by a qualified engineer licensed in the State of Texas. (2) Periodic Compliance Reports: Any Discharger subject to a Categorical Pretreatment Standard made a part of this Ordinance, after the compliance date of such Pretreatment Standard, or, in the case of a New Discharger, after commencement of the discharge, shall submit to the Authority, in a form to be provided by the Authority, during the months of June and December of each year, a report indicating the nature and concentration of prohibited or regulated substances in the effluent which are 1imited by the Pretreatment Standards hereof. In addition, this report shall include a record of all measured or estimated average and maximum daily flows which, during the reporting period, 'exceeded the average daily flow specified in Section 5. b. (1) and (2) hereof. Flows shall be reported on the basis of actual measurement, provided however, where cost or feasibility considerations justify, the Authority may accept reports of average and maximum flows estimated by verifiab~e techniques. The Authority, taking into consideration such factors as local high or low flow rates, holidays, budget cycles, or other extenuating factors, may authorize the submission of said reports on months ot11er than those specified above. (3) Compliance Date Report: Within 90 days following the date for final compliance by the Discharger with applicable Pretreatment Standards set forth in this Ordinance or 90 days following commencement of the introduction of - e · . e wastewater into the POTW by a New Discharger, and Discharger subject to this Ordinance shall submit to the Authority a report indicating the nature. and concentration of all prohibited or regulated substances contained in this discharge, and the average and maximum daily flow in gallons. The report shall state whether the applicable Pretreatment Standards or Requirements are being met on a consistent basis and, if not, what additional O&M and/or pretreatment is necessary to bring the Discharger into compliance with the applicable Pretreatment Standards or Requirements. This statement shall be signed by an authorized representative of the Discharger, and certified to by a qualified engineer licensed in the State of Texas. Reports of Dischargers shall contain all results of sampling and analysis of the discharge, including the flow rate, the nature and concentration of the constituents, or the production and mass of the constituents, where required by the Authority. The frequency of monitoring by the Discharger shall be as prescribed in the applicable Categorical Pretreatment Standard made a part of this Ordinance, or more frequently as designated by the Authority. Sampling shall be done in accordance with Standard Methods and 40 CFR, Part 136. (d) Inspection and Flow Measurement (1) The Authority ~ay inspect the facilities of any Discharger to determine compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance. The Discharger shall allow the Authority or its representatives to enter upon the premises of the Discharger at all reasonable hours, for the purposes of inspection, sampling, or examination of record. The ,_ Authority shall have the right to set up on the Discharger's property such devices as are necessary to conduct sampling, inspection, compliance monitoring and metering or measuring operations. The. inspectors, agents or representatives of the Authority charged with the enforcement of this section shall be deemed to be performing a e e e governmental function for the benefit and health and welfare of the general public and neither the Authority ,nor any individual inspector, agent or representative shall be held liable for any loss or damage, whether real or asserted, caused or alleged to have been caused as a result of the performance of such governmental function. The failure or refusw of such owners or occupants to comply with this provision shall be grounds for the disconnection of water and/or sewer service to the facility, pursuant to the enforcement and/or termination of service provisions of this ordinance. The industrial waste discharged or deposited into the sanitary sewers shall be subject to periodic inspection and sampling as often as may be deemed necessary by the Authority. Samples shall be collected in such manner as to be representative of the character and concentration of the waste under operational conditions. The laboratory methods used in the examination of said waste shall be Standard Methods or those set forth in 40 CFR, Part 136. The determination of the character and concentration of industrial waste shall be made at such times and on such schedules as may be established by the Authority. Should a Discharger desire a determination of the quality of such industrial waste be made at some time other than that scheduled by the Authority, such special determination may be made by the Authority at the expense of the owner or occupant discharging the waste. (2) Measurement of Flow: The volume of flow used in computing abnormal sewage surcharges shall be based upon metered water consumption or discharge as shown in the records of meter readings maintained by the Forth Worth Water Depar,tment. Where it can be shown to the satisfaction of the Director that a substantial portion of the water as measured by the aforesaid meter, or meters, does not enter the sanitary sewer system of the Authority, then the Director may require or permit the installation of additional meters at the owner's expense in such a manner as to measure the quantity of water actually entering the said e e e e e sanitary sewage system from the lot, parcel of land, building or premises of such owner or occupant, and the quantity of water used to determine the sewer service charge may be the quantity of water actually ent~ring the sewage system as so determined, if the Director so elects. Any Discharger who procures any part or all of his water supply from sources other than the North Richland Hills Department, all or part of which is discharged into the sanitary sewer, shall install and maintain at his expense an effluent meter or flow measuring device of the type approved by the Director for the purpose of determining the proper volume of flow to be used in comput- ing sewer service charges. Such meters or measuring devices shall be read monthly. If the Director finds that it is not practicable to measure the quantity or quality of waste by the aforesaid meters or monitoring devices, he shall determine the quantity or quality of the waste in any manner or method he may find practicable in order to arrive at the percentage of water entering the sanitary sewage system of the Authority and/or the quality of the sewage to be used to determine the sewer service charge. (e) Permit Modifications (1) The Authority reserves the right to amend any Waterwater Discharge Permit issued hereunder in order to assure compliance by the Authority with applicable laws and regulations. Within nine (9) months after the promulgation of a Categorical Pretreatment Standard, or within nine (9) months after the approval by EPA of the Authority's Pretreatment Program where Categoricål Pretreatment Standards are promulgated before EPA approval of the Authority's Pretreatme11t Progranl, the Wastewater Discharge Permit of e·ach Discharger subje·ct to such sta11dards shall be revised to require compliance \vith such standards V\rithin the time frame prescribed by such standards. (2) All Categorical Pretreatment Standards promulgated and adopted by the EPA after the promulgation of this Ordinance shall automatically become a part of · e e this Ordinance. Where a Discharger, subject to a Categorical Pretreatment Standard, has not previously submitted an application for a Wastewater Discharge Permit as required by Section 5. a. (2) above, the Discharger shall apply for a Wastewater Discharge Permit from the Authority within 180 days after the promulgation of the applicable Categorical Pretreatment Standard by the EPA. In addition, the Discharger with an existing Wastewater Discharge Permit shall submit to the Authority with 180 days after the promulgation of an applicable Categorical Pretreatment Standard, the information required by Section 5 .c. (1), above. The Discharger shall be informed of any proposed changes in his permit at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of change. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for compliance. (f) Confidential Information (1) All information and data submitted by a Discharger to the POTW may be submitted to Environmental Protection Agency, pursuant to the Clean Water Act and the regulations promulgated by the EP A, governing the POTW. Such information shall be considered subject to public disclosure, provided, however, that the Discharger may request that information not be subject to public disclosure, in accordance with 40 CFR Part 2, as follows: (a) A Discharger may assert a business confidentiality claim covering part or all of the information, in a manner described below, and that information covered by such a claim will be disclosed only by means of the procedures set forth below. (b) If no claim of business confidentiality is asserted, all information will be subject to public disclosure without further notice to the Discharger. (2) lVjethod and time of asserting business confidentiality claim: A Discharger Vvhich is submitting information to the Authority may assert a busi11ess confidentiality claim covering the information by placing on (or attaching to) the information, at the time it is submitted to the Authority, a cover sheet, e e e stamped or typed legend, or other suitable form of notice employing language such as "trade secret," "proprietary," or "company confidential." Allegedly confidential portions of otherwise nonconfidential documents should be clea;rly identified by the business, and may be submitted separately to facilitate ide~tification and handling by the Authority. If the business desires confidential treatment only until a certain date or until the occurrence of a certain event, the notice should so state. (3) Nothing in this section shall prevent the disclosure of information and data regarding the nature and content of a Discharger's effluent, and the frequency of discharge, or a standard or limitation to be met by Discharger, and this information shall be available to the public with no restrictions. (4) The provisions of this section shall be subject to any public disclosure requirements which may exist under Article 6252-17a, V.A.C.S. "6. ENFORCEMENT (a) Revocation of Permit The Authority may revoke the permit of any Discharger which fails to: (i) factually report the wastewater constituents and characteristics of its discharge; (ii) report significant changes in wastewater constituents or characteristics; (iii) allow reasonable access to the Discharger's premises by representatives of the Authority for the purpose of inspection or monitoring; or (iv) fulfill the conditions of its permit, or this Ordinance, or ,to obey any final judicial order with respect thereto. (b) Notification of Violation - Administrative Adjustment: Whenever the Authority finds that any Discharger has engaged in conduct which justifies r~vocation of a Wastewater Discharge Pern1it, pursuant to Section 6(a) hereof, the Authority shall serve or cause to be served upon such Discharger a written notice, either by personal delivery or b)r certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, stating the nature of the alleg'ed \riolation. Within thirty (30) days of the date of receipt of the notice, the Discharger shall respond in person or in writing to the Authority, advising of its position with respect to the allegations. e It e Thereafter, the parties shall meet to ascertain the veracity of the allegations and where necessary, establish a plan for the satisfactory correction thereof. (c) Show Cause Hearing Where the violation of Section 6(a) hereof is not corrected by means of Administrative Adjustment, the Authority may order any violating Discha,rger to show cause, before the Authority or its duly authorized representative, why the proposed permit revocation action should not be taken. A written notice shall be served on the Discharger by personal service, certified or registered, return receipt requested, specifying the time and place of a hearing to be held by the Authority or its designee regarding the violation, the reasons why the enforcement action is to be taken, the proposed enforcement action, and directing the Discharger to show cause before the Authority or its designee why the proposed enforcement action should not be taken. The notice of the hearing shall be served no less than ten ( 10) days before the hearing. Service may be made on any agent, officer, or authorized representative of the Discharger. The proceedings at the hearing shall be considered by the Authority which shall then enter appropriate orders with respect to the alleged improper activities of the Discharger. (d) Right of Appeal of Administrative Ruling Any Discharger or any interested party shall have the right to request in writing an interpretation or ruling by the Authority on any matter covered by this Ordinance and shall be entitled to a prompt written reply. In the event that such inquiry is by a Discharger and deals with matters of performance or compliance with this Ordinance or deals with a Wastewater -Discharge Permit issued pursuant hereto for which enforcement activity relating to,; an~alleged violation is the subject, receipt of a Discharger's request shall stay all enforcement proceedings pending receipt of the aforesaid written reply. (e) Judicial Proceedings Following the entry of any order by the Authority with respect to the conduct of a Dis·charger contrary to the provisions of Section 5 (a) hereof, the Attorney for e e e the Authority may, following the authorization, of such action by the Authority, commence an action for appropriate legal and/ or equitable relief in an appropriate court of competent jurisdiction. (f) Emergency Suspension of Service & Discharge Permits The Authority, amy, for good cause shown, suspend ~astewater treatment service to the Discharger's facility, when it appears to the Authority that an actual or threatened discharge presents or may present an imminent or substantial danger to the health or welfare of persons, substantial danger to the environment, interfere with the operation of the POTW, violate any pretreatment limits imposed by this Ordinance or any Wastewater Discharge Permit issued pursuant to this Ordinance. Any Discharger notified of the suspension of the Authority's wastewater treatment service and/or the Discharger's Wastewater Discharge Permit, shall within a reasonable period of time, as determined by the Authority, cease all discharges. In the event of the failure of the Discharger to comply voluntarily with the suspension order within the specified time, the Authority may commence judicial proceedings to compel the Discharger's compliance with such order or may immediately disconnect such Discharger's service line from the City water and/or sanitary sewer system. In the case of emergency disconnection of service, the Director shall make reasonable attempt to notify the occupant or user of the premises where such illegal discharge is generated before disconnecting the service line, and the party whose service has been disconnected shall have an opportunity for a hearing on the issue of the illegal discharge and the disconnection as soon as possible after such disconnection has taken place. The Authority may reinstate the Wastewater Discharge Permit and/or the wastewater or water service upon proof by the Discharger of the cessation of the non-complying discharge or elimination of conditions creating the threat of imminent 02~ substantial danger as set forth above. The Cit~r water and/or wastewater service shall only be reconnected at the Dischargers expense. , ... (g) Operating Upsets e Any Discharger which experience~ an upset in operations which places the Discharger in a temporary state of non-compliance with this Ordinance shall inform the Authority thereof within 24 hours of first awareness of the commencement of the upset. Where such information is given orally, the Authority may at its discretion require a written follow-up report thereof to be filed by the Discharger with thè Authority within five working days. The report shall specify: 1) Description of the upset, the cause thereof and the upset's impact on a Discharger's compliance status. 2) Duration of non-compliance, including exact dates and times of non-compliance, and if the non-compliance continues, the time by which compliance is reasonable expected to occur. 3) All steps taken or to be taken to reduce, eliminate and prevent recurrence of such an upset or other conditions of non-compliance. e A documented and verified, bona fide operating upset shall be an affirmative defense to any enforcement action brought by the Authority against a Discharger for any non-compliance with the Ordinance which arises out of violations alleged to have occurred during the period of the upset. (h) Recovery of Costs Incurred by the Authority Any Discharger violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance, or who discharges or causes a discharge producing a deposit or obstruction, or causes damage to or impairs the Authority's wastewater disposal system, shall be liable to the Authority for any expense, loss, or damage caused by such violation or discharge. The Authority .shall bill the Discharger for the costs incurred by the Authority for any cleaning, repair, or replacement work caused .by the violation or àischarge. e (i) Falsifying Information Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation or . certification in any application, record, report, plan or other document filed or e e e . .. required to be maintained pursuant to this Ordinance, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders any inaccurate monitoring device or method required under this Ordinance, shall upon conviction be punished by the imposition of a fine of not more than $1,000 for each offense. 6. MISCELLANEOUS , (a) Removal Credits Where applicable, the Authority may elect to initiate a program of removal credits as part of this Ordinance to reflect the POTW's ability to remove pollutants in accordance with 40 CFR Part 403. 7 . (b) Net I Gross Calculations The Authority may elect to adjust Categorical Pretreatment Standards to reflect the presence of pollutants in the Discharger's intake water, in accordance with 40 CFR Part 402.15. (c) Preservation of Records All Dischargers subject to this Ordinance shall retain and preserve for no less than three (3) years, any records, books, documents, memoranda, reports, correspondence and any and all summaries thereof, relating to monitoring, sampling and chemical analyses made by or on behalf of a Discharger in connection with its discharge. All records which pertain to matters which are the subject of Administrative Adjustment or ~ny other enforcement or litigation activities brought by the Authority pursuant hereto shall be retain~d and preserved by the Discharger until all enforcement activities have concluded and all periods of limitation with respect to any and all appeals have expired. (d) Costs of Administering Program The Authority may make such charges, known as monitoring and pretreatment charges, as are reasonable for services rendered in administering the programs outlined il1 this ordinance. Such charges may include, but are not limited to, the following: e e e , (II> (1) permitting industrial facilities (2 ) inspection (3) sample analysis ( 4 ) monitoring (5 ) enforcement (e) Right of Revision: The Authority reserves the right to amend this Ordinance to provide for more or less stringent limitations or requirements on discharges to the POTW where deemed necessary to comply with the objectives set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance" SECTION II. That this Ordinance shall repeal every prior Ordinance and provision of the North Richland Hills City Code in conflict herewith but only insofar as any portion of such prior Ordinance or provision shall be in conflict, and as to all other Ordinances or provisions of the North Richland Hills City Code not in direct conflict herewith, this Ordinance shall be and is hereby made cumulative. SECTION III. That all rights or remedies of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the North Richland Hills City Code, as amended, which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance; and as to such accrued violations, the Court shall have all of the powers that existed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION IV. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this Ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of an)! court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or sectiol1. ·., ... .. SECTION V. e That the violation of any provision of this Ordinance or of the North Richland Hills City Code relating to sewer' service shall be deemed an o~fense and punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000), and each violation hereof, and each day on which there is a failure to comply with the terms of this Ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be a distinct and separate offense and punishable as such. SECTION VI. That the City Secretary of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby directed to publish the caption, penalty clause and effective date of this Ordinance once in the official newspaper of the City of North Richland Hills, as authorized by Article 1176b-l Revised Civil Statutes of Texas. SECTION VII. That the City Secretary of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby directed . _ to engross and enroll this Ordinance by copying the caption and penalty clause of same in the minutes of the City Council of North Richland Hills and by filing the Ordinance in the Ordinance Records of said City. SECTION VIII. That this Ordinance shall take effect September 27, 1983, provided, however, that it shall be duly published., as r~quired by law, and it is so ordained. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: e City Attorney .. .. ," .~...- 9-20-83 ;"; DATE: . ,., ::~~-_:< .- - . . ", : tlBJEcr :- . ~ Con~ract With City ·of -Fort Worth for Industri~l w~~ip DEP ARTMENT : Public Works BACKGROUND: This ties' in with the Industrial Waste Ordinance' and is à" contract 'for'·, Fort Worth to continue treaLing our ·industrial.waste. ~ . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve contract with City' of Fort Worth to continue - treating our industrial waste. BUDGETED ITEM: ' YES N/ A NO ACCOUNT NUMB~ ---- - -- . ------------------------~--~------------------------ -~~-~~~~~~~~- . . . . A 1 AMENDMENT TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. 5280 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT § § WHEREAS, on May 1st , 19 65 , the City of Fort Worth and the Ci ty of North Rich1and Hills entered into Ci ty Secretary Contract No. 5280 , whereby the City of Fort Worth agreed to provide the Ci ty of North Richland Hills wi th connection to its sanitary sewer collection system; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the mandate of the United States Environ- mental Protection Agency, the City of Fort Worth has promulgated an ordinance providing for the rnoni taring of the wastewater of those industries which discharge into the Fort Worth sanitary sewer sys- tem; and WHEREAS, it is necessary that customer cities take measures to participate in the industrial waste program by adopting an ordinance with the same standards and industrial waste pretreatment programs as those of the City of Fort Worth ordinance; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary that customer cities agree to cooperate with the City of Fort Worth in the monitoring of indus- trial users in their cities: and WHEREAS, the Ci ty of Fort Worth and ~-tL2f North Richland Hills now mutually desire to amend City Secretary Contract No. 5280 I to provide ..for the adoption of appropriate ordinances and for other participation by City of North Richland Hills in the industrial waste control program of the City of Fort Worth. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the City of Fort Worth, a home-rule ITlunici.pal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas, acting herein by and through David Ivory, its duly authorized Assistant City Manager, and - . Citv of North Richland Hills , acting by and through Dick Faram , its duly authorized . Mayor , ./ do hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. City Secretary Contract No. 5280 , on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of Fort Worth, is hereby amended by substituting the following in lieu of Section S even thereof, and, after such amendment, Section Seven of City Secretary Contract No. 5280 shall read and be as follows, to wit: . "--L-. INDUSTRIAL CONNECTIONS AND WASTES A. GENERAL CONDITIONS Ill. No person, firm or corporation operating or maintaining any cormnercial, manufacturing or industrial establishment discharging into the sewers any 'industrial waste,' as defined in the Code of the City of Fort Worth and amendments thereto, shall have the right hereunder to connect, directly or indirectly, or to remain connected, to the sanitary sewerage system of the City of Fort Worth unless prior approval is granted by the Director of the Fort Worth Water Department: and it is understood that no such approval shall be granted unless the quality of the waste to be introduced is controlled in compliance with the pertinent ordinances, rules and/or regulations of City governing such industrial wastes. All provisions and terms relating to industrial wastes and industrial connections contained in sai'd Ci ty Code and amendments thereto are referred to and incorporated herein the same as if set out verbatim¡ . II 2. Customer agz;-ees to cooperate wi th Ci ty in in- specting industrial wastes produced by all industries con- nected to Customer· s sani tary sewer system in order to determine the quality of sewage introduced into its sani- tary sewer system by such industries. Customer agrees, at any or all reasonable times requested by Fort Worth, to permit an authorized City inspector to participate in~ such inspections. Such inspections may include, but will not be limited to, sampling the sewage produced by industries and inspection of all records, maintained by Customer regard- ing industries connected to Customer's Sanitary Sewer Systemi "3. Further, the quali ty of the sewage delivered into the Fort Worth sanitary sewerage system from the san- itary sewer system of Customer shall be equal to or better than the quality standards established by current or future ordinances of City regulating industrial wastes to be injected into the Fort Worth sanitary sewerage system. Customer covenants and agrees to be liable for violation of such quality standards applicable to a producer of in- dustrial wastes located within the corporate boundaries of the City of Fort Worth. In the event that any such. viola- -2- . tion occurs, Ci ty will notify Customer of the existence thereof, and the Customer covenants and agrees to correct _ same. Customer further covenants and agrees to pay excess wastewater strength charges for its wastewater which has a strength of greater than normal sewage, according to the applicable rate charged to .industrial customers in the moni tared group, according to Chapter 37 of the Code of the Ci ty of Fort Worth, or to pay a charge according to rates specified in this contract, whichever sum is greater. The defini tion of the' term "Normal Sewage Strength" shall be the same as is found in Chapter 37 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth. ' "B. WASTEWATER QUALITY Ill. Industrial discharges and prohibited wastes. Customer agrees that Fort Worth has the authority to es- tablish: . (i) types and quantities of discharges that are prohibi ted for entry into the Fort Worth wastewater system¡ (ii) discharge prohibitions for stances, as may be amended time; certain sub- from time to (iii) pretreatment requirements for industries who discharge prohibited substances. Customer shall require all industrial users that ultimate- ly discharge into the Fort 'Worth wastewater system to obtain an industrial waste discharge permit. Such permit shall require industrial users to abate prohibited sub- stances from their waste stream as a condi tion to dis- charging wastewater into Customer's collection system. The permit application shall, as a minimum, contain the fol- lowing information: . Name and address of industry; Type of industry; Products produced or services rendered; Typical analysis of the discharge waste stream; Chemicals used and chemicals being stored by the industry. Customer shall provide Fort Worth a copy of the permi t application and the approved permit within fourteen (14) days after such approval by Customer. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. "2. Customer agrees that on or before September 23, 1983, it will enact an ordinance that will enable Customer to enforce, within Customer's jurisdiction, the provisions of all prevailing Fort Worth Ordinances and applicable Federal regulations relating to (1) discharged substances, (2) prohibited discharges, (3) pretreatment requirements, (4) ~ndustrial discharge permit system, and (5) industrial self-monitoring reports. At the effective date of this contract the applicable Fort Worth ordinance is No. 8895 __, contained in Exhibit A incorporated herein -3- . . . ,~ , and made a part of this contract. Any future ordinance changes relating to industrial discharges, prohibited or controlled wastes or pretreatment requirements shall apply to this contract as if in effect at the effective date of this contract; provided, however, that Customer shall be' provided copies of present and future applicable ordi- nances and shall have an opportunity to review same before formally required to acknowledge acceptance of the condi- tions of such ordinance. "C. SAMPLING AND TESTING Ill. Customer agrees that Fort Worth shall have the right to sample wastewater discharges at: (i ) (ii) (iii). the site of discharge, points of entry, other locations, as required, for the purpose of determining the type and strength of discharges. Customer shall provide all possible assistance to Fort Worth in ob- taining access to sampling points. II 2 . Customer agrees that ~ny indi vidual customer found in violation of allowable discharges or any individ- ual customer who refuses access for the purpose of sampl- ing shall be disconnected from Customer's and Fort Worth's wastewater system; provided, however, that the violating customer shall be afforded the same rights, privileges of appeal and deficiency cure periods as are customers oper- ating within Fort Worth boundaries and under authority of Fort Worth ordinances. ,113. Fort Worth shall regularly take twenty-four (24) hour composite samples of wastewater discharges at points of entry to the Fort Worth Wastewater System no less fre- quently than annually. Costs of sampling and test shall be borne by Fort Worth: provided, however, that snould Customer's sewage exceed normal strength wastewater, then Customer will be chårged 'pursuant to Section 6 (A) (3) of this contract. IICustomer shall be provided wi th a copy of each sample test within thirty (30) days of the date of taking of such' sample. It 2 . All other provisions, covenants, recitals, terms and conditions of City Secretary Contract No. 5280 which are not expressly alner1ded herein shall remain in full force and effect. -4- It . . . . . this agreement this IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ,. Wade Adkins, City Attorney Date: ATTEST: day of , 19 CITY OF FORT WORTH By: David Ivory Assistant City Manager By: -,5- ~..;:,;..,;.:'- ,~ C-, '. ~,?~'::':n'_", '-." -,-:~. ~-~'!!t~;:;i:C::£:':"-;:":;""ð" '~~ ,,~ ~",-_~ ~~ :..- _'!'. ' ~. . ~.~ . ... . .. ~ ~ '--~J~~~~L~:~ _ DATE: Xerography Lease Purchase --2P;~~{~::': - : .. ~~~;~.";:.~"::-~'_~'~:'~ ::'H·~_~"_~":~~~ ,'.... .....! .. ': --~ ;:~.j(.' .~~~ .~:. t .. ~.:. .."4.... .~" ~ ...... - . 9-22-83 /"'~ "," J'/ " r .. ....' ..:"'*~'" .. '" .. , :~Ž'~ - :- .. .. .;....... -~. ......... ~- .-' . '-,. ....... . .. .., ....,.. .... .. - ~-. . .. . .." ~-._- '- ~ -.~CT :_ . ~~:":'-". .....' ...~ .......~ --.. DEPARTMENT : Purchas.ing ;. - ' . . . .....: MCKGROqND: - . ,. . At the present time we' have ..a . lease purchase program ~it~ Xerox for one , . :'...-Mod-el 5600 and one Model 3109' Xerox cóþiêr',~· The quality of the c~pies "ånd the . . reliabili ty. of,. the copier is poor, and' we 'are charged a surcharge ~or each copy run over our 15,000 pe'r ·month allowance. '-In .other words,; we are paying·,for our paper "_v.J.~ice. The cost of - the p.resent system,"and a cost savings W±~h·:a new ~yste.m f-crr whic.h . . . ":- ...' ."'- .. ;:.~:¡, have arranged -a .proposed lease are outlined be.low.. ~.- ..- ,-Present System <-"Hodel, 5600 cost for two year lease ' Model 3109 cost for five year lease . $30, 764. $24, 466 · .: '~-'Proposed 'Two Year Lease Total' $55,230 - Sharp 825 and 900 $2~,886 $33,344 $13,853 $19,491 Gr~ss Potential ·Savings Less amount already paid Xerox ~ ---- . ------ ~ Net saving with new 'system CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Authorize the Purchasing Agent to execute a lease/purchase with Zeno Systems for two new copiers for.24 months at a cost of $1,059.31 per month. . BT!I~GE'rED I 'rE!'~ : YES X NO ACCOUNT ~L'f}fBER: 01-20-02-4750 __.___~_~___~~-1~~____________________________~__________________________ . lJ \ . ';'.',.., ~'~;:.....--.:- .- .....-~~~.-_._'-: ._-;..'~--~~= ~ '- . ....,.,..~;<~~.:.~:!;,"~:-~.:~,;-,',:~', -: ., ~ ..... "..--:': ~:...""-II' :"-- 4 ,_ :........':.~..:..;..~..--- '., "-\...~.:. ~-_:.".,.~.,¡.;- . .~-................. ... ~:~.~ ..-:..............~... þ..( .. .~,' ,. .... _.- -: ... . ~~~~~Wfi~tl~i.: ... ',. ':,;: :::E~~-:~.. ~." , .J:..~~.~;.-..:.~._ '. ': ", '... DATE: ".,,~~"":., ~~::-:.> ". -~ - . =: .-:-. ,-,.. ..:- . .." . . ~~ .. ~.:.:.....ý~.',.... . . 9-22-83 .. . -. . -' ............ .',." .. o· ,-.. .' "'.... ~..... -. , -.~CT :. Xero~raphy Lease Purchase _0' ~~. , ·('P~8.p) DEPARTMENT : #. BACKGROUND: Proposed New Lease/Purchase . . The proposed new lease/purchase agreement for -two Sharp copieT'~ (Mnnp1 Nnm'hpT'~ ~?t; ~ Qn"n) ~11-have.a tota1cost of $21.886 amortized over a 24 montp period. ~~ will not have a copy surcharge, and at the end 'of the 24 month' period we will OwD tbe machines~ and ·our copy cost will be for paper and supplies only. . 0 .. . .. Total s~vlngs with the new system ·is $33,344,· less -wh~'t we have already paid '.0':1t to Xer.ox. Net saving.s j..s $19,491. (The monthly figure includes a maintenance contract) '. .. ........ ....~ - ~ -. CITY COLTNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: , BT!t~GE'.rED ITE!~': YES NO ACCOUl'rr 1\-rmœER: -~.~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~--~-~~---~~~~~~~~-~--~-~~~~~-~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~-~-~~-~~-~~~-~- . ;, ~.~:~. . .,. ;-- . - .-."" . ;- ':-. -' .. .. ~.. ~ : _.. þo : . 4t :___ -_: . -. - ...~.: .. ~~ '. .. DATE: 9-20-83 . ..~ ... .. . 0 .._ . - . -......... ~ . - --SUBJECT:' -'. - Morgan Meadows Drainage'Ìmprovements . (West) DEP ARTMENT : BACKGROUND: This is for the construction of Morgan Meadows West drainage facilities . .. and as you tan see, if we a:llow th'em to close Chapman Road during construction we save appro~imately$J-7,000. But; due to the heavy traf~ic on Chapmánand~.~.with Rufe Snow being torn up at this tim~; I, do not see how we could deto~r traffic ~ without causing undue hardship for people. This project. was originally set up in the capit~l improvement program for ·.$70,000. Because of the extensive ~ulvert work at Chapman Drive the project amount was increased. . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve' bid of M & D ConstructioI(Co., in the amount of '1, . $138,995.73 and approve use of reserve capital improvement funds. BUDGETED ITEM: . YES X NO AC COUl\7 NlJMB ER : General Obligation Bonds & General Fund Reserve Capital Fund ~~--------~~~~~-~~~--~~~--~~~~~- ------------------~ . e /: KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 16, 1983 .Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-317, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MORGAN MEADOWS DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BID TABULATION IL accordance with your instructions, bids were received on September 13, 1983, for the referenced project. This project includes culvert improvements on Chapman Drive and Hightower Drive along with earthen channel improvements across the Jarl, Winters, and Mormon properties west of the Morgan Meadows Addition. The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the tabulation indicates, bids were received from three (3) contractors. The low bid submitted was from M and D Construction Co., P.O. Box 8047, Ft. Worth, Texas 76124, in the amount of $138,995.73, for a period of 100 calendar 4IÞ days. . The engineer's estimate was $150,000. This bid is based on constructing the Chapman Drive box culvert in two _ sections, thus permitting two-way traffic across the~ culvert at all times. The contractor will deduct $12,000 from the total bid price if he is permitted to close down Chapman Drive for a period not to exceed 60 days. Your award of this contract should include a stipulation of which option you choose. e On the basis of the bids submitted, we would recommend that this contract be awarded to M and D Construction Co. in the amount of either $138,995.73 if Chapman is kept open at all times, or the amount of $126,995.73 if you will permit Chapman to be closed down for 60 days. We will be present at the September 26 Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: ~æ. Rodger N. Line, City ¥mnager /Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works ~/ Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works / 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367 ~-_......... -.. .~.., - -'- !"...- ,. . '.... . . ....... . _-a ~ DATE: 9-20-83 '~ .. .. ~. . ~ .. ::':;:~~.~:'... '...., . . ...... ,.........,. :-..~. . '" ~ SUBJECT:' Mackey Creek Channel TmprÒvemen ts _.e - DEPARTMENT: Public ·Wo1:ks BACKGROUND: Enclosed are the bids on the improvement of Mackey Creek near Onyx Dr. North. These improvements will be þ~id- for by Community Development Funds which passes to us through th~ CQunty. : e CITY COUNCIL Aq'ION REQUlRED~ Recommend to the County that· the bid of Jeske Construction ". . Co. in the amount ·of'$66,318.00 be accept~d. BUDGETED ITEM: . YES NO+- ACCOUNT r.u:MBER: ~ _~______'-"_""""''''''-'______~WIIIÞ___''-'-'__ ~~-~-~~-~~~~~~~~~-~~~-~~~~~----~~~~-~~~- - / " e e e i.. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS / Fort V\'Orth-Dallas KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. September 16, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 30-307, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MACKEY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, PH. IV ~ROJECT B-82-UC-48-0001/824820 Bids were received on September 15, 1983, at the Tarrant County PlanniD8 Department for the referenced project. This project includes concrete channel liner on Mackey Creek from the end of the existing riprap to a point north of Onyx Drive N. We would request that this -item be placed on the next regular Council meeting agenda for consideration of recommendation of Contract award by the Commissioner's Court. The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the tabulation indicates, bids were received from five (5) contractors. The low bid was submitted by Jeske Construction Co., P.O. Box 31361, Dallas, Texas 75231, in the amount of $66,318.00, with a total time bid of 90 Calendar days. This project is being funded entirely by H.U.D. through the Community Development Block Grant Program. The m~imum budgeted funding for construction of this project has been established at $81,900. We would recommend that any unused portion of the total amount available of $81,900 be applied to next year's Mackey Creek improvements project, (9th year), for continuation of the channel liner along with utility adjustments as required. On the basis of the bids submitted, we would suggest that the City Council recommend that the County Commissioner's Court award this Contract in the amount of $66,318.00 based on the unit prices submitted in the proposal and the estimated quantities of construction, to the low bidder, Jeske Construction Co. We will be present at the September 26 Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. RICHARD w. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: ~~. Rodger N. Line, City Manager > Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works /' Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Delton Thrasher, Tarrant County Program Coordinator SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG_ · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211< METRÇ>/267-3367 . , . ~ . ~) I DATE: 9-21-83 . . -.. ...'. . ,..-.-- --. . -::- r..-' . -. '. ~ ... : . ~-SUPJECT:' -.. - North Hills Stréet & Drainage Improvements - Partial P~y E~t;m~te #8 DEPARTMENT : ., Pub~ic Works BACKGROUND: . . Foz: all· practical purposes this :job is 100% complete b.ut this is the next to "last 'payment on. this job. After the final i~spection on North Hills the final estimate will be ~aid le$s liquidated . . damages. The "liquidåted damages wil·l be $lOO a day. for approximately -- 60 days on this job. . CITY COUNCIL AC!ION REQUIRED: Approve payment to Stolaruk' Corporation in the amount of $52,795.28 BUDGETED ITEM: . YES x NO ACCOUNT l\c'W1BER: General Obligation Bonds -~-...._~--~------ ~-~~~~~~-~~-~--~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~-~~~-~~~ . -- /. . KNOWL TON-ENGLJSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 17, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Ricbland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-325, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NORTH HILLS STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.8 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.8, dated September 15, 1983, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation, in the amount of $52,795.28, for material.s furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of August 31,1983. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. 4IÞ We recommend that this payment, in amount of $52,795.28, be made to Stolaruk Corporation at P.O. Box 61587, Dallas, Texas 75261. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the September 26 Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. í« ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW AI ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Libe, City Manager 7Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works // Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Ronald T. Jones, Stolaruk Corporation 4IÞ 550 FIRST ST ATE SANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 DATE: 9-21-83 .SUBJEc:I :_ DEP ARTMENT : BACKGROUND: Holiday North Street-& Drainage Improvements - Partial Pay "Estimate #7 Public Works This job' is about 96% or 97% complete. and the job is on schedule. This will probably be the next. to last payment an"d the'" fina·i payment will be made after the final inspe~tion a~d clean up is done. -. - - .- e CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approve payment to Stolaruk 'Corporation in the amount of $71,936.15. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO General Obli~ ~_____________~___________________________ e / ~ e e e KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth..Oal1as September 17, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-328, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.7 Enc.losed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.7, dated September 15, 1983, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation, in the amount of $71,936.15, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of August 31,1983. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $71,936.15, be made to Stolaruk Corporation at P.O. Box 61587, Dallas, Texas 75261. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the September 26 Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. tu,Otk:- RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager / Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bro?stad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Ronald T. Jones, Stolaruk Corporation 550 FIRST ST ATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/263-6211 · METRO/267-3367 .. ,,~ ~,.;. ,~;;'..o: .~ r. -.. .- ~ , t. -< ,~ DATE: AUGUST 18, 1983 ce SURJECT:. WATER BILLING POLICY -CHANGE - DELINQUENT BILL FOR FIRST TIME DEP ARTMEN'I : FINANCE . BACKGROUND: DUE'TO THE NUMBER OF CALLS FROM CITIZENS CONCERNING HAVING THEIR WA~RR . . . . TURNED OFF FOR DELINQUENT BILL FOR THE FIRST TIME.. COUNCIL WANT:r;D A REVTRW BY A COMMITTEE OF JIM KEN,NA.. RICHARD DAVIS.. RODGER 'N. LINE... AND LOU SPÌEGEL. TFŒ COMMITTEE MET AND THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMI~TEE IS TO MATTI ANO~~R Nn~T~ TO CITIZENS GIVING THEM FIVE ADDITIONAL DAYS (2S DAYS FROM nPtrrR ()'F 'T''R'R -RTT.r.) 'T'() "PàV THEIR BILL IF IT· IS THE FIRST TIME THEY HAVE BEEN DELIN01JENT. DtJRING THR r!TTR"R'RN'T' TWELVE MONTH PERIOD. THIS POLICY CHANGE CAN BE IMPLEMENTED AS OF OCTOBER 1. lq8~ ¿:. ~.. CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: APPROVE/DISAPPROVE BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT J\TUMBER: . of c9t-v j ,.... ; A - IJ J ------------------~----------------------------------------------------~~----------- . ~s. ~I ~ ." c. .. ~" . fiiØ" . , . ORDINANCE NO. 1056 Be it ordained by the City Council of the City ·of North Richland Hills, Texas, that Ordinance No. 381, "Rules and Regulations for Water and .Sewer System" adopted November 8, 1981, and as heretofore amended, be and the ~ sa~e i~.' hereby amended at Section III, Paragraph C to read as follows: /* . C. . Billing -- DELINQUENT PENALTY Effective All charges for services furnished or rendered by the City Utility Department shall become due and payable fifteen (15) days from the date mailed. Bills will become d~linquent after the second .notice and twenty (20) days from the initial billing date. Customers who become delinquent no more than one time in any twelve (12) month period will be given a third notice and will have an additional five (5) days from the date of the third notice before service is discontinued. Á f .ì 19 ' date of this Ordinance shall be ~ 1, 1983. PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of September , 1983. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPRO\7ED AS TO FORIV1 AND LEGALITY: Ci t)7 At torney ~'I , DATE: September 22, 1983 . SUBJECT :. Ordinance Establishing Fees for Certain Documents DEPARTMENT: Police In order that the Police Department may establish fees to recoup the cost BACKGROUND: . . .. of providing copies of cert'ain documents it is required that these fees be established by ordinance. . The Police Department currently charges only for accident and offense reports at a "flat-fee" of $2.00 each. State law provides' this minimum charge currently. however, we've no means of recouping additional cos~s such as- multiple page reports or those reports that must be mailed.. Under State law, 6252-17A Section one 'through fifteen.. a municipality must adopt an ordinance outlining any fees other than these outlined above. The fee structure proposed is in line with the surrounding cities who· have such an ordi- . nance in èffect. We've had an increase in requests for such service: ,as' fingerprinting of aliens; those applying for a Class III Weapons Dealers license: a Securitv BrQkers l~r.~ns~. a Private Security license and letters certifying that a person does not have a Criminal Record. CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Request passage of Ordinance # BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: G/ ------------------------------------------------------/~----- -1 ",j" -~~-------- /" ~ . ',' ".. ;':--1....,..0,,,.;::..:. .,~ '..,:' . " w - . _, fÞ . ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the charges levied by the City of North' Richland Hills to . defray certain cost illcurred by the City have not been revised in some time, and; WHEREAS, the cost to the City of North Richland Hills has risen substantially during that time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Richland Hills that charges for the various documents shall be levied in accordance with the following schedule: Accident Report $2.00 - First Page .25 - Each Additional Page .25 - Extra if Mailed Incident/Offense Report $3.00 Fingerprints $4.00 - Per Card . Copies/Microfilm .50 - Per Copy Good Conduct Letter $1.00 Record Check (Criminal History) $5.00 Research Fee / Comp u ter / Microfilm $5.00 - Per Hour Photographs $3.00 - For Instant Color PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1983. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary . 4,\, September 8) 1983 ¿;IS .. DATE: , ~ .\, . .. . - SUBJECT :. Request of Kem Advertising for Billboard Sign Along Loop 820 'a t Glenview . Drive DEP .AR.TMENT : Public Wo:z:ks BACKGROUND: Pertinent sections of the Si2n Ordinance are attached for your rev;pw. ~. ' . highlighte¿,·for:~ase of reference. There is no s~ecific prohibition a~a~ust havinf ~ . /. ~'.,: " ~ a bÙlbo~rd sign· on the -same property as a ground sign; however) -the provision is written in such a way that it appears that the intent was to limit~ the number of signs to one. City Council considera~ion and guidance 1S requested regarding this request and for future similar situations. . ~~ CITY COUNCIL AC!ION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove requested s1gn BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ::::~~_:~::~---~-----_--l~i~~___________________~___________________________ . -..... :.~':':..:".-..~.;!~ :,....,-~,,/~,.......~...~:... ;. . ; ,~"~.~ .;~~=~. 4 _ _¿ftC .. ., ":.... :¡;. \:.p (b) Temporary Signs: for temporary signs. a single filing/permit fee of $10.00 shall be required SECTION 3.10 IDENTIFICATION Every 'sign or other advertising structure erected shall have painted on, or otherwise permanently marked upon it a number assigned by the Building Department, ~ -which s9ári ~e po~ less than one (1) inch in height and shall be plainly visible from the ground or from the roof adjacent to the sign. ARTICLE 4 AREA OF SIGN PERMITTED SECTION 4.1 SIGNS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL (a) For signing purposes, frontage on private streets that serve as public thoroughfares and not just driveways may, with City Council approval, be considered as qualified street frontage. (b) Anyone (1) development may have a choice of I but not"' more than ,one ~. (1) ground s.ign or one (1) roof sign or one (1) projecting sign, subject to the excep- tions contained in Section 4.2 through 4.8., In the case of very large developments (e.g., shopping centers, åpartment co~lexes, etc.) that have substantial frontages . on two or more·· streets (with commercial or industrial zoning on both sides of the ,...~ streets) I additional ground signs may be permitted with special approval from the ~. ·City Council. SECTION 4.2 GROUND'S"IGNS Ground signs are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each 300 linear feet of qualified street frontage with each development in all zoning districts except AG, l-F, 2-F and MF. (b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be measured as one (1) square foot of area of sign for each linear foot of street frontage, to a rr~ximurn area of sign of 300 square feet for anyone sign. (c) The maximum height. of any ground sign and its supporting structure shall be twenty-five (25) feet, except that the height of a ground sign may be in- c~e~seè by adding one (1) foot of height for each linear foot the sisn is set back f~c!7: t.he adjacent property lines, no't to exceeà a maximum height of fifty (50) feet to ~~€ top of the sign. (d) The height 0: any grc~è sign IT~Y Dot exceeè c~e-h21f (~) the sho~test ll:-~e¿~ distance from the loca tion of t.he sign to the nEarest bou:-~è.ë..ry of any AG I 1-: I . 2-:", :.:::- M? zoning district. ·...«-~~. ~').~ ~.: ,'. ('.;'. ", ·M'.>'. ,.... ,': -, , ....~~~~"Ç~. -~' . ....~# -..: .~-::....., ~ - ',~'..~/.....,,:- ~::. _·;:.;:....:~:-í:,Z'--.......d.. :.........,.:....... ~~~'::....,..-:. "....,...,'~... .~'.'.1''''''''.~'' ~ .... KEM ADVERTISING. INC.. :!263 Ei~:-.th A;.·enue. Fort Wont\. 1exas 76110 (817ì 9:'.5521 ". a; · Outdoor Advertising Specialists , to August 11, 1983 .,. /' Mr. Rodger Line City Manager City Of North Richland Rills P.o. Box 18609 North -rtichland Hills, Texas 76118 De a r It-l r. L i n e , we would like to request to be on the agenda for the August 22, 1983 meeting of the North Richland Bills City Council. The purpose of our appearance is t.o seek issuance of a permit fOt: a billboard sign located .at the cornel: of Glenview and N.E. Loop 820 currently occupied by Pearl vision Center. Thank you for your consideration. ~ r J .. \ \ .' ~ , COM'" C RC 'AL "--__¡"'.EAL £.5""" t -.. (~,.~ . ..... -'-..... ~ Ge \:..~. ~;p .. -. ., .,-. ~......J..,:..l..."':~._'~ ... ~ . - - . - ..- . .,- BRADLEY G:" HARRISON 6'6 RO..tHG S,:ÞR.HGS RO"O e '7·' 3~' :U; 13 ,817·732·S~ 10 FORT WORTM, TEXAS 76..41 August lOt 1983 . \ . t. " Mr. Jimmy E. Dan; el KEM Advertising, Inc. 2263 Eighth Avenue Fort Worth~ Texas 76110 Re: Billboard Sigfi. I - 820 & Glenview N. Richland Hills, Texas Dear Jimmy: , . This will serve_to confirm our conversation concerning the sub j e c t pro 'p e r t y and you r des ; r e toe r e eta b ; 1 1 _ board sign. Please consider this your authority to make application for a building permit and take any other action on my behalf to secur~ such permit. If you, or the City of N. Richland Hills, require any further authority or information please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, BGH/mbh DATE: September 8, 1983 ~þ .... " ~~, /.~BJECT:_ Request of Mobil Oil .Corporation for variance from Sign· Ordinance (. " , DEPARTMEl\"T: Pub,~ic. Works BACKGROUND: :.The applicant has requested three pole signs; one is a pricing s~gn and the other·j"~~· ar~':'Mobil signs ,- The sign ordinance allows only one pole-· sign'" on this ~.,. / /' ;. ., .. ,. property, Thr~ugh inadve~tence) the applicant was improperly given a set of plans show- ing all three signs as being approved~ . . Accordingly, "the applicant proceeded to erect the poles) and they are in place. The applicant was told pr~or to 'erecting ~he signs that permits were required) but he proceeded with e~ecting the poles. withoùt.p~rmits. t. ~',~, ' . ' CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove the requested variance. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO AC CO L"Ñ"T ~'1.JH:B E R : . __________~q,J ~~___________________~___________________________ -------------------- ~~~~ . c. ..,. " '-.:,.,.;.;.r . , J--- Mobil Oil Corporation . , /' P.o. BOX 222225 DALLAS. TEXAS 75222 ENGINEERING CENTER September 2, 1983 City Manager City of North Richland Hills P.o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Sir: RE: Mobil Service Station 5036 Rufe Snow Drive North Richland Hills, TX Permission is requèsted to be placed on the agenda of the September 12, 1983 City Council Meeting to request a variance to ordinance no. 1001 of the North Richland Hills Building Code. This request is to allow the installation of Mobil identification and price signage at subject location. If you s~ould have any questions concerning this, please call the undersigned at (214) 658- 9. HDS/bjh REX McENTIRE - ofaw Ol/iu~ 0/ .R,z 'YI7c¿nf¡rø 'michae! 'YI7cGn,t¡,.ø 5024 BROADWAY FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76117 TELEPHONE 83' -0011 AREA CODE 817 METRO 429-0702 MAYOR DICK FARAM HE: TESCD Rate Application of Jillle 9, 1983 Dear :M:AYOR The enclosed study of Associated Utility Specialists discloses that the rate increase should be limited to 2.26%. . I am enclosing an Ordinance \mich I am recarmending to the cities' I represent. This Ordinance denies "'IESCD's application that is limited to a 2.26% increase.,-- "The _Qrdinance does not grant'this increase; it s~ply denies the application. yours, .. Rex McEntire Attorney at law RM/jh Enclosure - !"" . -- . . ... ..-.- -"~--._:-.~ ORDINANCE NO. -7 i D ~? WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills , Texas has duly considered the rate application of Texas Electric Service Company filed with the City on or about June 9, 1983; and ~~EREAS, the City Council has received said application and has considered the application itself and other evidence p,resented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of- North Richland Hills , Texas, that: 1. The schedule of rates filed with the City by Texas Electric Service Company's application of June 9, 1983, be and is hereby denied. , 2. - - The City Council finds that Texas Electric Service Company is entitled to an increase in rates (in connection with said application) not to exceed 2.26% of the rates that were in effect on the d~te of the application. The City Cou~cil will hear and act upon a new schedule of rates filed by Texas Electric $ervice Company wherein the increase is within, the confines of this finding. PASSED this day of , 1983. APPRO\iED: h~A YOR .ATTEST: City Secretary . . .0 . ~. .. - -r STATE OF TEXAS 0 o croNTY OF TARRANT 0 AFFIDAVIT . . On this day personally appeared J. Travis Snith VJho on his oath ~p:>ses and says that: 1. My name is J. Travis Snith. 2. I am president of Associated Utility Specialists of Irving, Texas . 3. I have a B. A. I:egree fran Texas A & M University in Business Administration. I have had 23 years e~rience in public utility management. I have had eight additional .years in utility regulation and as&>ciated activities. 1~y expert ·test:imony has been received by the Public Utility Carrnission of Texas, the Railroad Carrnission of Texas) the New 1~xico Public Se:rvice Carmission and the District Court of IRllas Cotmt'y, Texas. 4. Attached hereto is my review, analysis and evaluation of the rate application, _qated 'June"9, 1983, of Texas Electric Service O:rnpariy. . - - -~ .- 5. My recarrnendation is that any increase a 2. 26% increase. Wi tness my hand this ~daY of . ~. in rates 'te limited to' - ...... 1983. :- S\IDrn to and subscri'ted 'tefore me 'by J. _,~ J~ · :.£ t ,1983. County, . . . ~ ". -:. '-~ . .~.~ - - .,;: ..!"""'- ........' - . . .~ . MR. REX MCENTIRE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF HALTOM CITY HALTOM CITY, TEXAS I HAVE COMPLETED THE REVIEW, ANALYSIS, AND EVALUATION OF ALL DATA PRESENTED BY TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY IN SUPPORT OF THE COMPANY'S RATE APPLICATION OF ~UNE 9, 1983. ALL CON- CLUSIONS DERIVED FROM THE INFORMATION REVIEWED ARE SUPPORTED BY WORK PAPERS RELATIVE THERETO. .~~ J. TRAVIS SMITH 9-17-83 . ~ - ,.. - ;; ..4 .. .. .~. '_~' 4 ,¡. _ ~ 0. ~ _.1ïc_ ~ '.. ..... . TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY RATE APPLICATION JUNE 9 t 1983 - . ~ - ... - .. PAGE 1 , ..;,. -~:~'. ~'... . ~- ~.~ -'~~ TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY RATE APPLICATION DATED JUNE 9~1983 . The basic data submitted by the company in support of it~s rate application has been examined and evaluated - certain additional sources of information have been utilized for corroboration of application data and for the development of additional data relative thereto. Affiliate- transactions have been examined in detail and reconciled to the fullest extent possible with data areas affected within the rate a p p 1 i cat ion its elf. Ion add i t ion tot h e d eta; 1 sup po r t fur n ish e d with the rate application package, extensive usage has been ap·pl ied to FERC FORM 1 ANNUAL REPORTS ~ DETAIL INVOICES FROM AFFILIATES, and GENERAL ANNUAL REPORTS TO THE TEXAS RAILROAD COMMISSION as filed by affiliates and other related companies. Results and findings of the examination and analysis are pre- sented herein by the following components: . Value of Invested Capital Cost of Service Cost of Service - 1982 , CD s t of..C a pit a 1 Common Equity Re·tu'rn· on Common Equïty ~ Cost Comparison Adjustments _ V'alue of Inve.sted Capital Fuel Cost Other SCHEDULE 1 SCHEDULE 2 SCHEDULE 2 - A ,SCHEDULE.3_- A SCHEDULE 3 - B SCHEDULE 3 -... C SCHEDULE 4 - ~ PAGE a Page b - c Page d - VALUE OF INVESTED CAPITAL (Schedule 1) The value of invested capital is presented in three column format for the year 1982, for the test year per our analysis, and for the test year as adjusted by the company·s application. Column 2, the test year data per our analysis, indicates the following status: USED AND USEFUL PLANT IN SERVICE PLUS: CWIP and WORKING CAPITAL LESS: DEFERRED FIT, DEPOSITS, RESERVES VALUE OF INVESTED CAPITAL $ 1 217 669 200 415 956 500 151 867 800 1 481 757 900 .. The determined value of invested capital has a variance of $ 774 574 800 in comparison with the company·s presented data, most of which is attributable to the company·s inclusion of all construction work in progress ($ 1 048 444 700) in it's valu- ation as opposed to our determination of $ 358 792 800 as being a fair and reasonable amount for this item. As explained within attached "ADJUSTMENTS PAGE a", adjustments have been effected in such manner as to include on a fair and reasonable basis that property which can be classified as "Used and Useful" in render- ing service to the public. -: TE5CO' PAGE 2 .. -. ,.~...,..., . :. ...-.....-.. -'.. . .,,,",-...: . The last three lines of the VALUE OF INVESTED CA~ITAL schedule have. b,een utilized to appl.y the calc'ulated RATE OF RETURN to the VALUE OF INVESTED CAPITAL to produce the REQUIRED RETURN. Differential between the company's pre- sented RATE OF RETURN and our calculated RATE OF RETURN is attributable to the RETURN ON COMMON EQUITY factor. The company has presented a factor utilizing a 17.50% return on common equity, whereas we have calculated a_fair return on common equity to be 15.34%. . COST OF SERVICE (SCHEDULE 2) The cost of service i'5 presenteø in three column format for the t est 'y ear end e d 19 8 3, for the rev; s. e d t est yea r aft e r the adjustments have been applied, and for the company IS adjusted test year af,ter application of t'he company's adjustments. The.__ most significant differentials between the company·s adjust- ments and those we have applied are· to be· found in the fuel cost adjustments. Current tendencies on gas prices simply do not justify the scale of adjustments which the company ,has effected as explained within ADJUSTMENTS PAGE band c attached. In addition~·-t.he comp'any'''s 'da'ta' ind;-cates a labor adjustment .of 7.29% a~ove test year level - the test year itself contained an increase of 2.57% above the talenda~year 1982 level. 1982 e.xperie,n.ce was 17..67% i·nexcess of the 1981 average. The CONSUMER PRICE INDEX increase for the period June 1982 ~o June 1983 s-h,nwsan increase of 2.58%. T.he employee basë:- indicates .an·'adjust.ment of 2.21% for this component to be a d e qua t e - the mar gin b p t wee n C PI. P 1 ù s e m p 1 Ò y e e bas e ;. n t r: e a s e -. ~ å n d the· ã in 0 u n t r" 0 f . the tot a 1 . 1 a b 0 r:' in ere a s ë·, s h 0 U ] 'd b e <-. JUS t i f i a b 1 e through' prGduct·;v;·ty. Producttv·jty-,· of course, would have a positive expression in the cost ~f service. Further differential exists in the company's adjustment for OTHER TAXES ~hich is attributable to an error in the company's ,adjustment ~alculation 'for revenue taxes.($ 3 139 387). REVISED TEST YEAR COST OF S~~VICE (column 2) indicates that the company·s test year revenues were 2.26% below the level required by the cost of service ( $ 26 250 200 ). The company's adjusted co S t 0 f s e r v ice i n d ;- cat e san e e d for $ 1 72 176 400 add i t ion a 1 revenues (14.83%). .. COST OF CAPITAL (Schedule 3 - A) The weighted average cost of capital is indicated to be 12.3014%, and the company·s request is for a 13.367% factor. As previously mentioned, this differential is attributable to the company's calculation of a return of 17.50% on common equity as opposed to our calculation of 15.34%. It is interesting to note that the return to TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY on it·s actual cash invested in TESCO was: 20.08% for 1980, 24.37% for 1981, and 23.74% for 19 82 . . . ... ~; # . PAGE 3 ;::..,~~...¡:':::,.- TESCO . ;1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Our findings indicate a Test Year Value of Invested Capital of $ 1 481 757 900, a required Rate of Return of 12.301%, a R e qui red "R e t urn 0 f $ 1 82 2 71 0 0 0, a C 0 s t 0 f S e r v i .c e 0 f $ 1 187 384 800, Revenues of $,1 161 134 600, and a deficit in revenues of $ 26 250 200 (2.26~). COST COMPARISON (SCHEDULE 4) Comparisons of costs for the years 1981 and 1982 have been made and are detailed by category and perce~tage of one year increase. I~ addition, a comparison has been madé between 1968 and 1982 on key categories, resulting -iñ" a ':1982 index representative of cost increase status for each o~ the ¿ategories. At the sam~ time, the CONSUMER ,PRICE INDEX (1967 = 100) and the PRODUCERS PRICE INDEX (1967 = 100) can be effectively measured against the results of the 1968-1982 compar;sons·.MWH Production per MWH Capacity ?hows:· a dec]ine of 20% - cost factors in every category show increases "far in e-xcess óf èither tne-PROÒUC~S, 'PRICE INDEX or the ,CONSUMERS PRICE INDEX. . ----. ~ " - .. - . f '- I!Þ .. SCHEDULE 1 - .. ~.. ~ . :;::0 :;::0 <: o~o~õ ~ ("") -0 C ::z n -0 r- :z r- :z ("") '""'0 -0 m ):> :Þ -Immc::m· 00 r- en c::or m fT1 fT1 c: C> r 'I -; -f r- :x: en " (.1)_ :::0 ::z c: IT1 n ::z: » U') -I (.f) (""") :z :x> » c: m c: m ", m -f (.I) ^ (./') U) c r- en ::z U') (.I) r- V> :z :z :;::0 m :::c ;0 ;0 0 .. Þ-4 -f .. m -I --I . . -0 .. f'TI --i --I -I :z 0 <:::0::3: ::z ;0 øo :þ:;c r- »;0 " 0 f'T1 f'T1 m G") c:: ;:0 c: " » o :::0 c:: -r¡ ~ :;c .." l/') 0 :::c n c: ("") 0 :z m ("") 0 z- m :::c n-l (J') .." -I ;0 -I -0 " --I :::c .0 m Þ-C .." 0 :Þ~ rr1 c:~ :;::0 c: ...... (.I) c: -{ :z m fT1 -00 -ra m 0 .." m m 0 ." I'T1 ÞO-t c: < 0-0 ÞO-t :z c: r :z c:: n r- :z c: :::c ::::0 ::::0 . m m C> --i r- -f ÞO-t --I <:: m z c.n :::c U') »~ :E c: :Þ :E c:: ~ 0 -t :Þ ...... .0 -0 o :::0 -r o;on I'T1 r- -I :::c r ::c f'T1 Þ-C :;c rr1 m 0 U') ^ » ^ 0 ^ a-4 :z c: ::z c::: ("") :z ...... -I ...... en Þ-C (/) :Þ ("") :z ::z fTl ;c :ZITI -0 0 m ...... ~ -0 ""Q (J') -0 --f I"T1 ::0 :;c m ;C ):> C 0 ;0 0 r- --f Ci) C) <: \ éï> » :;c :::c ITI ::::c x m rrJ I'T1 m V> (.I) (J') V> U') (./') (J') ~, ~ N ....-a ....-a <: -f J> rr1 ~ .þ ....-a W N \0 N ~ \.0 """-J r >< O"t ..... O"t ...... N Con W ...... .þ \0 c.n \0 ~ '-D ~ c:: » \0 ..... .þ 0'\ N 0 '-oJ 0'\ \0 O"t <..nON .þ <..n <.n 0 N ..... m c.n ~ """-J (J'1 CD - W \0. -.....J ....-a o "" N ..... '" U1_ _ _ c.n ..þ t-A en (J1 0'\ \0 0 m 0 CC <..n -Þ CO -Þ ....-a -Þ '-oJ ..... <.nOW 0 o U'1 0 W ...-.a ex:> ,,-. r- . W (J'1 U1 ONenN \0 N ~ (J"1 N (X)N ~ WN(X)N(X) N m ~ ...... n en c.o W..þNO ....-a W ..þ W ...-.a ..þ N o W ....-a -Þ ..þ :z -I <: :;c -fT1 ~ V'J n :--{ m (J') 0 m N :;c t-a ..... ..... N ..... ..... '-" ('"') <: -f » ...... ..... .þ. ...-.a W N 0 W U'1 0 -.....J m -0 n CC ...-.a ex:> ...-.a N 0'1 U1 ..... .þ ..þ ..... o ..þ.-.þ N (,/) ~ I"T1 N N ..... cn w ..þ '-J '" I):) -.....J \0 OJ N '-' \0 \.C> ex> N '-J -f -I :Þ ("") N W " WW'-ON ~ '-J O"t ....-a -Þ (J'1 CD ..þ ...... ..þ 0'1 ~ -< r- 0 '-oJ 0 (J'1 .þ t-A 0'\ U'1 en '-D 0'\ CX>-ÞW N WCD-ÞWO m ~ ..... ..... '" ONO-Þ WN \0 ...... ..þ N -....... N...... ..þ N ~ » .....--.- -0 ~ :::c » 0 \0 W ..þ ..þ '" -....... cx> N N '-oJ ..þ <..n 01 N ......, ~ '-J ~ Z -< 0 0 0 ..-.-.... » N N N ..... ..... 0 c..., W N ..... W W U1 0 -.....¡ c::: ("'") 0 ..... (J'1 ...... N \0 ...... ..... C> ..þ ..þ N (,/) 0 ..... W 0'\ 0'\ W .þ. -.....J 0 '-' '-oJ \0 "" OJ N ......, -i 3: m -0 en w W WW\ON W cx> CD ..þ Þ-' ..þ <.n t-' 0 :Þ 0 0'\ W ..þ ..... 0'\ 0'1 '-oJ N N WOO~wC> :z .þ -.....¡ N ONQ-þ W -....... -.....¡ N t-' -Þ N ........ -i -< ~ m 0 ........ w ..þ ..þ '-oJ 0 01 U1 (J'1 N '-J ..þ '-oJ (./') (/) -i c.n n -< ::x:: . m fT1 » c :::c c:: r- ,." ...... I. 31na3HJS . SCHEDULE 2 - , e. 1 \ .- 0 :::0 ("") ;0 en 0 .." .Q '-I > > (I) CO) ':n C '--1 o ..." I"'T1 m 0 ,..., ,." -I IT1 ' rT1 0 C C > c:: c:: .... ;0 --I C ." <: V') .-.. n :r:: c -c ...... c... 3: r- en In U') > :I: ", ...... ,." -t C C "., fT1 ~ > c ~ ", -I -t -I :z rr'1 r- n :z ::c ';0 :;0 ::c ..IT1 r- U') :z en 0 0 :::c U') ::0 ...... C (:) :z ...... :x:- c-') -f ...... 3: ~ ...... :lC ' -:- --f fT1 ." --I -f r- . ...... 0 X en JT1 rT1 aJ ...... ""'0 U') :::0 -< > :> -c fT1 -t ;;4 ::0 C V') 0 ,...... V) ~- >< .... -I r'T1 :z ;0 -t V) :e::: ,." ,." .0 C rr1 :z: ...... ::::0 -I > - . (I) > ...... " ,... " ..rn - >< ::c c ", en n 0 :%> V') -t m g 0 0 ;0 n c:: .... " 0 :z --I ...... ::c ::z :z J"T1 ...... ::0 0 3: ...... ;c <: -= <:> " V) n ", tf) I'T1 0 I'T1 IT1 ...... C ::0 V) I'T1 0 ..... :z n :z 0 ........- --I -I 0 go f'T1 -t 0 :Þ go ...... C ...... >< Qo C) :z n :z rr1 3: IT1 G') -I -I (,I) :Þ ::t= :z . .. ...... m e ...... rr1 0 ::0 :z ::c :z JT1 --t :> V') ,." . 4\ -t :z :;Þ :z n ITI n --f o fT1 (..I) >< ..... ...... - -I :Þ -I V) - ..... ...... .-- --.-.s U'1 fTI W <:) ::> .~ 0'\ Q) 0\ --..J U1 \0 t.n .... ~ t...)_ CO (X) tf) I " IT1 W N <=> 0 ..þ U1 ~ C> ~ f--oA ~ U1 U1 -f W--. I- ., ..... ~ en rr1 ~ 0'\ ..... en N en CD .... ~ N ..... Cot.) W N CD 0." 00') I ..... rr1 n '~\O W W .......... N W (X) \0 N (X) W (X) ..... .~ 't,.t.) 0'\ ..þ ,." ~ -""'-' ::;:c-f U1 .þ C) , ..... W ..... N \0 N ---.. W 0 0 '-I (X) .-- w :Þ w <:: :::c . . . ;0 - ...... ~ -.....¡ en w .0 0 0\ \0 W U1 ..þ N CD --. en ·W 01 m ..... - n ('"") ", l/') ,----. I"'T1 ;0 ~< ...... on ..... .... 0'" --f 0 ..... .... .... CD- (J"1 rr1 ::0 n NN 0\ (X) (X) en --...a U"I .... U'1 ..... N W CD \.0 (,J') rr1 ,-,0 0'\ ...... -....J N U1 0 .þ .þ U1 .þ 0 ..... ..... en c.n \0 -f <: ,.....,. ~ N '4 ~ N -c 0'\ N t--& W N U'1 0 ~ --....¡ U1 0 ..... w ·w N CD U'1 0\0 -< l/') '-' ::t> ~U'I w CD ---.. N (X) eX) "\0 N .þ CD w CD ..... 0'\ W 0'\ 0 f'T1 I"T1 :z 0 .þ ..þ ..... W N N \0 en ....... ........, w 0 0 ........, CD ...... U1 :Þ 0 -< - N 0'\ ex> 0 0 en \0 w 0 w .þ 'f'5 co 0'\ W U'1 enw ...... ...... --I ::Þ ..... .... w w CD en I"T1 0 ...-. ........ 0'\ W 0 en U"1 U'1 ..þ U"1 ' .=-a N w ex> w c... ~N .... W ..... (X) \C W \0 CD 0 N W C'\ U"1 ....... --I c:: w V') CD ...... f--oA W en U'1 c.:n ... -Þ ex> w CD W -.....J W ~ '-0 U'1 ~ ~ w ........, w ~ 0 N ---.. U1 ...... W W U'1 en ...... 0 -......J U1 U"1 rr1 I'T1 ~ 0"\ .þ. ...... -Þ W ....... U1 \0 - --...J 0 .þ ...... 0 0 0 '-J N :x:- 0 :;0 (J) . en 0 0 0 ...... N \0 CD ........, ...... '" 0'\ 0 0'\ N \.0 (""") (""") 0 :I: rT1 0 c:: r- rr'1 N Z 31na3HJS . ., . . ... .. . - . .. .. S CH E DU ['E ,·2:,=~-~~i-A ~ . TEXAS ELECTRIC SERiICE COMPANY 1982 COST OF SERVICE ( $ 000 ) . .. . FUEL . .$ 574 471.0 OTHER' POWER PRODUCTION . 79' aÏ-Š-:"3 TRANSMISSION 6 423.1 DISTRIBUTION 31 016.0 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING 20 642.5 CUSTOMER SERVICE 9 794.0 SALES ~30.0 ADMINISTRATIVE ,& GENERAL 52 639.0 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 775 133.9 DEPRECIATION. 53 796.9 FEDERAL INCOME TAXES 64 122.6 . OTHER TAXES ~ 58 873.4 SECURITY DEPOSIT INTEREST 503~O - ..- RETURN REQUI-R,ED 169 703.6 - - COST OF SERVICE 1 122 133.4 REVENUES 1 145 504.6 EXCESS- EARNINGS 23 371.2· .. ,,' .~ ~ .. _. ,. . Lú ~ ex:: NM <:) en c::t ex:: M ...... 'd- N ...... LLJ ex> 0 \0 LO 0 :::- ...... 0 en r-I M c:c 'd- 0 0 f'. N C ...... ~ ~ r . - ~~ ~ ex) 0'\ M ~ ~ f LLJ OJ ....... o· 'd- f- mew-> ~ M c:c ex: 0'\ ........ ex) in M ...... CD ...J I <C ...... ..- M ...... I ¢~ co en N 0- M <C " \0 ex) CX) ...... U 0::: ex) N N N ........ ct: l- e LO ('f') en u-. LJ.J V) ~:. 0 en 0 N ....-f ~ U CXJ N Lt) \0 r-f N en en C> lJJ U t-' ..... " N M M - Lt') M .-. ,-..... ,....... . I- MLO 0 ....-f 0 Z 0'\ M M 0 \0 => 0 ....-f ¢ M ~ ::E: 0\ ¢ 0'\ N ex: ex) N 0\ ....-t N --1 <C N r-.... N 0\ I- CX) ....... ........ N 0 co 0 c::t \0 I- 0 ..... C> ....-f \0 0 ~ IIId- .... lid- ....-f ~ u 0 >- l- I- V) ~ ~ c CT W LLI c::: ex:: z V') LLJ 0 ...J en l- LL... :E: <: . , . <C CD LLI :E: t- -1 W ex: 0 0 u 0 c.. (..) . I- , E 31n03HJS ·- .. ( -. TESCO: COMMON EQUITY 3-31-83 STATED VALUE 603 500.0 RETAINED VALUE 389 517.3 BOOK VALUE 993 017.3 . ~ , ii' ~ ". ¡", .. SCHEDULE 3 ."- Q "'-of.. . '.--...-.... .'~ , .\,", ::t'; '.. ":""~-: ._~ '\. ~ ....:. ':"' _. -.... _. ". - -- - .., .. . ' ... . , . to',. SCHEDULE 3°' - èc'~~~~~~~~~~~' . .. . texas Electric Service Company .." RETURN ON COMMON EQU.ITY 3~31·-83 . ' (MKT PRICE MKT PRICE) (PROCEEDS x EARNINGS ) DIVIDEND VALUE + MARKET PRICE 27.5243 + 2.3307 4.0083 27.5243 . 6 . 86.6 8 + 8.~678 = 15.34% -- - - - . " .... =~ . - 1 e· . S C HE DU L E . '~4 ~:::-'::__ . . . . .~~j_:':~;;"-'.- - .-- TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY COST COMPARISON 1968 INDEX = 100 . . . 19 81- 19 82 19 82-- ~9 6'8 ') .. ~ -.-. ~ - .. . ~ ~.. ... .. : ':.:: 'J-~ ~ ;.:." t ~119:82 INDEX INCREASE $ RANGE ~ . .. ~ . O~ERATION & MAINTENANCE 1458.45 36.67% ~. 77 5 -133 . 9 53 147.8 FUEL 2378.05 44. ·35% 574 471.0 . - . - 24 1 5 7 .,2 O&M LABOR 403.17 17.67% '.. 67 890.1 16 838.9 AVERAGE LABOR COST .331.78 14.63% 24 996.0 ; ~. (.:: . . 7 534.0 OTHER O&M EXPENSES 1 092.63 19 . 07% 132 772.7 12 151.7 * POWER PRO D . LESS FUEL -COST 1 632.91 18.42% 79 818.3 - . Þ: J-: ) : 4 888.1 . * COST PER MWH PRODUCED '750.42 ~ 12 .97% - - 3.5127 0.4681 - - MWH P,RO DU CI,I ON PER MWH CAPACITY 80.0 ' 4. 83% -=.3 788.99 .' . r· 1..·)~ :¡ -' -4 735.42 O&M COST PER ACCOUNT LESS FUEL 447.47 13.02% 348.62 77.91 /' .. =~". ,,- ,'" CONSUMER PRICE INDEX JUNE 1983 = 298.1 PRODUCERS PRICE INDEX AUG 1983 = 286.2 '., P AG E..a .·..ADJUSTMENTS.. TO VALUE OF INVESTED CAPITAL ~,--<t--\--~: ....): .....;.:....,.;;.;"'-_:_-~.-__, ~.- . PLANT FOR FUTURE USE and NUCLEAR FUEL IN PROCESS are adjusted from the valu~ of invested capital ,because'they do not meet the PURA cri teri a of .. used' by and useful to" the uti 1 ; ty ; n render; ng s e r vie e tot h e pub 1 -; c. - ~ -." - - - '. . . -. 1""' 'I - ~ - :. :" : --. CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS has been included on the following basis: (1) All CWIP on plant other than generating plant is in- cluded in the value of invested capital. (2) Generating ,plant subject to closing within two years ~ -,:;: :~í.r--o.m' t'.e s-t- ~y e a·r -.,d at·e- . i,s: -in:clu,d e.d ,..;. n -.I th e value··o f:;, n v.e ste d; :c ap i tal ~_ on ,a .fifty percent basis subject to adjustment for net curreot year ALLOWANCE FOR FUNDS USED DURING CONSTRUCT¡ON. This method ·apportions responsibility for this segment of CWIP,equitably be- tween the company and the public served. With due consideration for excess generating capacity currently existing (38.92%), it --:=-.:::~:- .~ ~-:=-=-_:. ~,:a:~Jlea-rs:-:..--t(): --be-" :..-{.a";-~ :-a-n~d-"-,F1e:a50-n ab 1 e . to s 0 app:o,r.ti-oll___~CWIP,:1It: _ ,_ - : ::: _~:7-::._ : '=-. _...-- -- - - WORKING. CAPITAL as presented by the company has been adjusted in the following ,areas: . (1) FUEL OIL is adjusted consistent with the interest ~alue of the amount' invested in the item. The basic premise for such adjustment . ~=: =-~ :.=:=-:==~'~ :r, ~ ',='=::: !=,; "F-~'~ttt~t~-, ,th e :f:u n d $; :~"£o~ :es---tå bl-is..h m.9..R t· : 0 f th i:s: .:..ð C-COJ!ß:=t'-:-..a-r-e~~:'":de..ri,.Y:.e d, = :--: =- -. from capital· and the intere"st value~is the lowest valued component. . -If ·the company":reas·oning is to the ,~ffect that the funds are de- rived from operational cash- flow the item of allowance for annual ope ra t'; on and' ma i nten an ce- e xpens'es . it rad ;-~ti orra 11y'es taU 1 ; she d at '12 10/ 2p e r c e n t) W 0 U 1 d need to be further considered. ~ ::-:-= :-..;.-.;:-~ .:=:=:.;:-=.:: ::.::: -=-..::~~)=rT~h=~ ~ct-a:ir me d-;.:a-l :l::QW-a=n-c-@-.r$-e"-~-~e pay me n·t s ~.a-n~-::m.a~t-e:ri:a l.Sj.s.ü:p;p.1 i:es~ :-:::-.-:. has been adjusted on the basis that charge allocations for apport- ion men t of the s e i t ems are r 0 ute d ' 'to e i the r C W I P 0 r 0 P E RAT I ON & MAINTENANCE - as such the standard allowance of one-eighth of the annual' O&M shouJd be_adeq.uate..Jbis._.j.,ssu,e is clouded with the~ apparent excessive average balance maintained in the materials and - ::: :::~=-- =- :==-= --:-==s~aP-lYl!.i ~e-'S=:..~a.:-c C o'u-n t·. ~'T~e-':' G-Gm p,any !Js. -uS::Up P 9-~,t d a t:a- Ì:nd-i~~c a..:te5---:-..aßR.u.al:,.,-: t e s:t :: year M&S usage of $ 3 843 463 in relation to an adjusted average b a 1 a nee 0 f j,.' 12 6 32 7 86 - t his t ran 5 1 ate sin t ò a n a v era 9 e 3. 3 yea r s supply ofM&S- Items in the average balance. The allowance for O&M Expenses looms even more sJ~nificant when we acknowledge that one months O&M is provided for through cost of service and rates based ._-~. - - - _.__.,n '-_H--~:t-he¡r-e-(tll~la'nd a -forty,-fi-ve;;day-~a·~l~Ðwance ;s ,ut;-l,;ozed-.j.n,-,-the.-.wQt'~kjng capital formula. .. . . . - ..- . ,~ - - - - . . . . . , FUEL COST ADJUSTMENT ..;. PAGE b '. .... '"- . ----.--.. ... - -. _.~-;~ ..¡~".,,::-~ --~-~~ . ~- . - . . GAS FUEL repr.esents' 82.04% of TESCO·S Test'·Y·ear fuel cost. The supplier of TESeOIS gas is it's affiliate ( TUFCO ). Lone Star Gas Company deliveries to_ T.UFCO _comprise 2'9% ofTUFc.Q~S_purchases, and those from Southwestern Gas 'Pipeline, Inc. comprise 8~ of TUFCO'S purchases. It ;s reasonable to state that pricing trends experienced by these two companies are significant respective to TESeOls fuel costs. Southwestern initiated ten percent reductions in the price jt pays to itls suppliers and ten -percent reductions in -the prices it charges..itls. c.ustomers {effective Apri_'._ls 1~83). Lone Star Gas Company is experiencing a downward trend relati've to it's purchased gas costs as illustrated in the table below. TUFCO TESCO' - - - 3.7543 JULY 1983 JUNE MAY ,APRIL MARCH FEBRUARY' JANUARY DEC 1982 ° NOV OCT SEPT AUG JULY JUNE, MAY APRIL MARCH FEB JAN 1982 3. 711-1 3.7856 3.7607 3.7278 ,3.72¡8 --- ---- 3.0724å ~ - . - - ..... ... -- - - - - -- - . - .- - - - - ... - TESCO ., t ! JULY 1983 JUNE MAY ..~ APRIL MARCH -FEB~- JAN DEC NOV OCT SEPT AÜG - . JULY JUNE MAY APRIL MARCH - FEB JAN 1982 3.6127 3.8829 3.6623 3!7285 3.9474 3.4602 3.8064 3.8722 3 . 7486 3.9028 3.7555 3.6245 3.7606 . 3.4504 3.6488 3.3226 - - - ...- - ~ - - - lONE STAR 3..6092 3.5913 3.5563 3.6148 3.7027 3.7606 3.7753 3.8610 3.8320 3.7354 3.6542 3.6162 3 . 6 3 82 3.5330 3.4727 3.3781 3.3730 3.3711 3.2942 . ~... . .0 PAGE c ...:.~......~.-:- ......- .....:- .. - .-.' - .. .- - FUEL COST ADJUSTMENT 2 Key data relating to gas prìces can be summarized as follows: TESCO TUFCO -.'-.- - ---.---.-. --- 2ND QUARTER 1983 1ST QUARTER 1983 TEST YEAR 1982 $ 3.7543 $ --3.-72]-8·-...3.7.601_-_ 3.7218 3.7856 3.7111 3.7248 - ~.~---..----. The company has calculated FUEL ADJUSTMENTS in the amount of $ 45 509 755 which represents a 9.87% increase over actual 1982 costs incurred. Of the calculated, increase, $ 5694 999 r~p~~sents normalization Jor weather, end of year accounts, and price elastiéity~ 'The nórmalization entries havè -not been recognized in our ca1culations for the following reasons: (1) TUFCO deliveries for the first six months of 1982 exceed the volumes for the s~me period in 1983. (2) The company estimate for TUFCO in the fourth quarter of 1983 appear ~o _be_overstated. .~_ '(3) Fourth 'q"uarter calculat'ions fo":'" TUFCO' fuel costs' -èont-äín- -- errors. (4) Degree days through July 1983 are some 17% below tile" same per, i 0 d _i n 19 82 . - ~.::.., ~,A ,re.asonabl e fuel" cos"t aøj.us._tl11en_t_-.h_asbeen. cal cul.ated:to be $ 14 262~39 and has sO··bêëñ- íñéìudect'within -tne"l{EvtS·Ë'[f·-I-ËS-i-- -.~-- YEAR COST OF SERVICE. ., t ! . - -"~ .. .. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS . 'PAGE d ~. .".'. ~~::-:'::':;~ ~ ~. - i- OTHER ADJUSTMENTS to the cost of service can be summarized as: Ope ,r at; 0 n and M a i n ten an c e ex p 'e n s e s .; n c rea sed $ 5 041 300 Other Taxes increased $ 4 251000· The company's adjustments for revenue taxes contain errors which" ren der-th em--un a c-cep-ta b.:t-e-.-:r-h ; s - a c co-u n.ts--f.o r . ·ð- ·s ub s.tan t.i a] - p 0 rtj 0 n " _ of the differential between adjustments actually made and those proposed by the company. SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS FUEL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE OTHER TAXES REV.E N U ETA XES - $ 14 262 200 5 041 300 3 431 700 819 300 --- . i':.- ,4 - , -, '" .0 - - . 0 " ~ ~ ~ ~ M r- ei. 0 CD ...::t M < < < '" 0'\ ex) \0 " '""" .......... IV) ~ 0 ..... ~ ~ Z Z Z r( ...,. ..".... 0 0 '" 0 N '-0 0 ...... - CJ\ CO N M 0 CO CO 0 0'\ N 0'\ Lt"\ 0 N ..... N \D '" ..... .-t U"\ -:;t ~ ~ N r-f <no (/)- (h. (/)- CO '" N ..... M 0 .u ~ N eX) ..... '" 0 I' '" CO -4" 0\ .... CO ...::t \C ,-t N ~ 0 ....t LI"\ -:t ~ CX) N CX) tU)- tU)- c: M N ~ <I> ø- ..... --0 0 0 0 ...... 0 ~ '" 0 CO CX) M ...... f' U"\ 0 " \C 0\ 0 \D '" 0 r-- CO M '"'"'" QJ " 0\ r-f U"\ -:;t ...... ..... N ..... 0- (/)- U s: e4" ..... C1J (/)- (/)- --0 ..... CO C1J ~ .u I ,.. C =' 0 0 c: u :c --0 ex: c:: e c:: z CO 0 0 cø Cf.) ~ ø.. ~ ~ ¿.J Q) to "'0 ~ en 0 t: .u ø.. .u C1J .¡.J Q) ~ 0 ~ .-4 --0 c: Cf.) "'0 0 .u t: Q) ..... Q) Q) ¿.J ~ "'0 0 ...-t ~ .u "'0 C Cf.) en ClJ Z "'d -r-t tJ ..... Q) Q) ~ ...... ..... µ.. Q) $-t Q) Cf.) --0 ~ as ...... ~ ~ ~ Q) ..... Q) ..... I s-. .,...¡ -M () Q) ..... ø:: CI) c:: E-t ~ ~ Q) "~ 0 Q) 0 .u () M U e ~ z CO tI) U) ~ cø 0 .... 0 .u .u .u U U S tU)- U) ~ I I c:: C c:: Q) ~ Atfachment "8'1 cu Q) cu .... .u œJ ..... CI) U) ..,... ..... .,... 0 .... "'0 C .u U) CI) . .u .u .u =' ..... .¡.J 0 co 0 0 cd ct1 cø Q) 0 co co ~ 0 ..... ..... "ø.. ø.. ø.. u u ø.. 0 ~ t: U . . ~ ~ .... - Q) "'" s... >: CI) =< Þ< Q) Q) cu "'0 Q) OJ ...... 0 OJ 0 0 ..c ..c ..c ...... J:J .D cø s... ..... s... ~ E e e en e e .u C c. Co. =' =' =' Q) ::s :3 0 0 Po. Q. Z Z Z ~ Z Z E-t < :E < <