The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1983-10-24 Agendas r ...c . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 24, 1983 - 5:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM 5:30 P.M. ACTION TAKEN Joint Meeting - City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission 7:00 P.M. . Tour of Library , . . . . . . ~~'\ QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY DESCRIPTION OF RESPONDENTS CATEGORY Sex Males . . Females . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . Residence Apartment . IIome . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . Status of Housing Own . . . Rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Occupation Homemaker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Laborer . ... . .. ... Own Business . . . . . . . . . . Professional . . . . . . . . . . . . Skilled Craftsman . . . . . . . Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unemployed . . . Management . . . . . . . Retired . . . · . . . . . . Income Level $0-7,000 . . . 7,100-15,000 15,100-25,000 . . . . 25,100,50,000 SO, ODD-above . . . . · . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . · . . PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS · . 59% · . 41% · . 1 % 99% 87% · . 13% · . . 14% 4% 8% 37% 9% 1% 2% 11% 14~ · . . · . . 3% . . 10% 26% . . 48% . 13% • CATEGORY (cont 'd) PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS (cont 'd) Age - to 25 11% 26 to 30 12% 31 to 35 16% 36 to 40 14% 41 to 45 5% 46 to 50 6% 51 to 55 10% 56 to 60 8% 61 and Up 17% Education 1 to 8 yrs 3% 9 to 12 yrs 36% 13 to 16 yrs 47% 17 and Up 14% Demoninational Preference None 20% Assembly of God 3% Baptist 27%. Catholic 9% Christian 4% Church of Christ 8% Episcopal 2% Lutheran 3% Methodist 16% Other 2% Presbyterian 6% 2- ( ..' , . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 1. Beautification/litter control \,Jery~ E>atisfied Sëltisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 2. Emergency ambulance services Very S~1tisfied S¿:\t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 3.' F:"ire . Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 4. FloDd corrtr·c)l Very Satisfied Së:\t i sf i ed Di SSë\t i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied 5. Garbage sanitation ~Jet-y Së\tisfied S¿1t j, sf i ed Dissat.isfied Very Dissatisfied . L/ ~... ~(f'/ t,~J.:/"r' ¡ S .-- (J ), J t r,- -. .. \J /'Jr' J '}·f\l.. ~ ,',/, ~ .1.' FREQLJEr~CY ~ "-' 39 2é) "":!" "-' FREQUEt"JCY 15 4·6 5 1 FREQUEI'JCY 2C) 5() 1 () FREQUENCY 7 37 19 7 FREC!UEt,JCY 15 i~,3 1 () 4 F'ERCENT 4.23 54.93 36.62 4.23 F'ERCEr~T 22.39 68.66 7.46 1.49 F'ERCENT 28.17 7(). J~·2 1.41- (). ()(). F'ERCENT 1 (). () () 52.86 27~14 1 () . () () F'ERCEt~T 2(). 83 59.72 13.89 5.56 . : I i I, ." , ,. .', t t ! ~ t r \. ~ /-/-,.. (j'.~,~,..~.-1'\ ? I. . ~)-'J 0 t"~o..t :{~,i I,,· 4"./.;... . .. ,/'-J i ~. (.... . f! ' (~.J.:. ( ~/,., r ) I,; ,'. - .' , :,." ..... '.. ~ I J . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 6. Hazardous waste disposal FREQlJENCY Very S..~tisfied Së:\t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Ve~y Dissatisfied 2 42 8 4 7. Highway/street development FREQUENCY Ve".· 'y' Sa t i sf i ed Së:tt i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 2 29 28 15 8. 1"1ed i c: a 1 . Very Satisfied S¿it i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 1 () 54 7 () 9. F'olice FREQUENCY 'Jet-y Satisfied Satisfied ,Di ssat i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied " ,..\ ..::....::.. 4() 8 2 10. Public transportation I'/e..- y' Sa t i sf i ed Së:\t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Ve..-y Dissatisfied FREC!UEt"CY 1 26 2() 2C) . F'ERCENT 3.57 75. ()() 14.29 7.14 F'ERCENT 2. 7() 39.19 37.84 20.27 F'ERCENT 14 . (J8 76. ()6 9 . 86- O. () (>- F'ERCENT 3(1. 56 55.56 11.11 2.78 F'ERCENT 1.49 38.81 29.85 29.85 ;¿ . DUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 11. Sewer Very Satisfied SêJ.t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREC~UENCY 4 49 1 () 9 12. Utility rates FREQUENCY Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 2 ,.,,., ~~ 33 18 13. Water FREQUENCY . Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 17 6 --::- ,_, 42 14. Employment services ~iery Satisfied s(;·~ t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 1 44 7 3 15. Job training programs Ver-y Satisfied Sëitt i sf i ed Dissat.isfied --Very Dissatisfied FRE:QLJEtJCY 1 39 8 4 e F'ERCENT 5.56 68. ()6 13.89 12. 5C) F'ERCENT 2.67 29.33 44. ()() 24.0() F'ERCENT 4.41 61.76 25. ()(r- 8. 82- F'ERCENT 1.82 BC). ()() 12~73 5.45 F'ERCENT 1.92 75. ()() 15.38 7.69 3 . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 16. Community social services Vf?ry Satisfied Sê1 t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 7 56 4 () 17. Public image/visibility Very Satisfied Sêltisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 7 51 8 1 18. Religious education . Very Satisfied S¿itisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUEt~C\( 11 c--. -J"::" 3 1 19. Worship opportunities Very' Sat i sf i ed Së.it i sf i ed .Di ssat i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 19 49 () 1 2 () . '( Q Ll t. 't-. act i v i tie 5 ~.lery Sati sf i ed S ~.:\ tis fie d Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQLJEt·JCY 11 51 8 (> . F'ERCEt~T 1 (). 45 83.58 5.97 (). OC> F'ERCEt.JT 1 (). 45 76.12 11.94 1.49 FtERCENT 16.42 77.61 4.4& 1 . 49. F'ERCENT 27.54 71. ()1 () . ()() 1.45 FtERCEt~T 15.71 72.86 11.43 () . ()() L/- . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 21. Alcohol education FREQUENCY Very Satisfied Sc·;( t i sf i ed Dissat.isfied Ve~y Dissatisfied 22. Alcohol control 3\· 39 15 5 FREQUEt"CY Very Satisfied S~~tisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 23." Crime control/citizen help 5 31 2() 6 . Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 7 :3:6 24. Drug education 'Jery Sat i sf i ed Satisfied Di ssat. i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 25. Dr-Ltg coratr-ol \/ery Sati sf i ed Sè:tt i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied F' R E C! U E f" C '( . 2() ,., ..:.. -:r ...: ' 27 26 5 ,.., ..::. 29 23 8 F'ERCENT 4..84 62 . 9C) 24.19 8. ()6 F'ERCENT 8. ()6 5C). (>() 32.26 9.68 F'ERCENT 1 (). 77 55.38 3(). 77- 3. ()8- F'ERCENT 4.92 44.26 42.62 8.20 F'ERCENT -:r '"" "":r "';'. ..::. ...:. 46.77 37 . 1 () 12.9C) 5 . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 26. Fire safety education FREQUEr~CY Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 2 54 8 () 27. Law erlforc:efnent edL\Cati on Very' Sat i sf i ed Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 1 47 14 1 28. School patrol . \,ery 8ati sf i ed Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 4 59 C" ~ 1 29. Street parking FREQlJEt"CY ~ery Sat i sf i ed Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 3 4-:r ...: ' 23 c:- ~ 3 () . T I"· ct f· f i c 1 i 9 1-. t s Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREC!lJEt·JCY 6 :37 18 11 . F'ERCEt"r 3.13 84.38 1 2 . 5C) (). (>() F'ERCENT 1.59 74. b() 22.22 1.59 F'ERCEN"· 5. 8t) 85.51 7.2~ 1 . 45- F'ERCENT 4. ()5 58.11 31 . ()S 6.76 F'ERCEt"r 8.33 51.39 25. ()() 15.28 to . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 31. College course offerings Very Satisfied Sat i sf i 'ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREG!lJEt"CY 15 53 3 1 32. Continuing adul~ education Very Satisfied 8i:\t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUEr~CY 16 47 7 1 33. Parochial schools FREQUENCY . \"ery Sat i sf i ed Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 5 C" c:" ..J...J 2 () 34. Private schools I.....'er·y Satisfied Së"£\t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQLJEt"CY 4 5() 1 () () 35. Public school system ~iet-:,.' Sa t i sf i ed Sé~tisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 9 iJ.9 11 ~ .-' . F'ERCEr"T 2(). 83 73.61 4.17 1.39 F'ERCENT 22. 5.(+ 66. 2C) 9.86 1 . 41 F'ERCENT 8. ()6 88.71 3.2~ (). ()()- F'ERCEt"T 6.25 78.13 15.63 (). (>() F'ERCENT 12. 5() 68 . ()6 15.28 4.17 1 . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 36. Cultural arts FREG}UE~JC\{ Very Satisfied Së~t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 5 38 17 6 37. Child abLtSe Very Satisfied Sê.it i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 1 39 19 1 38. Child care . Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 4 43 7 ,., .... 39. Elderly FREQUEt~CY Very Satisfied Së:-\tisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 2 :~:6 16 4 4C). ~-Iand'Ì capped FREQlJEI~~CY ~Jery Sat i sf i ed Së:\t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 3 4() 13 2 . F'ERCEr~T 7.58 57.58 25.76 9 . ()9 F'ERCENT 1.67 65. ()() 31.67 1.67 F'ERCENT 7.14 76.79 12. 5()- 3. 57. F'ERCENT 3.45 62.07 27.59 6. 9() F'ERCEt·JT 5.17 68.97 22.41 3.45 ~ . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 41. Rehabilitation Very Satisfied Sëatisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQLJEt~C\( 2 37 15 -:r ...:. 42. '(üLltt1 Very Satisfied S ë":\ tis fie d Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY ,., ..:.. 38 1 ~. ..::. ,., ..:.. 43." Recreation resources . Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 6 39 21 5 44. Park development Very Satisfied Sè.it i sf i ed Dissat.isfied Very Dissatisfied FREC!UENCY 6 33 24 9 45. Business development \ler' ",.' Sa t i sf i ed Së:it i sf i ed Di ~:;Sëtt. i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQLJEt-JCY 8 C· c:- ~~ 7 1 . F'ERCENT 3.51 64.91 26.32 5.26 F'ERCEJ'~T 3.64 69 . ()9 23.64 3.64 F'ERCENT 8.45 54.93 29 . Sa- 7 . () 4_ F'ERCEr"r 8.33 45.83 33~33 12 . 5C) F'ERCEt"T 11.27 77 . 4l) 9 . f:36 1 . 41 c¡ . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS -NO. RICHLAND HILLS 46. Industrial development 'vJery' Satisfied S~;tt i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUEt"CY t> 57 7 1 47. Mall developments Very S¿tt i sf i ed Satisfied Dissatisfied yery Dissatisfied FREQUEt~CY 18 46 9 () 48. RestaLtrar.ts . ,Very Sati sf i ed Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 19 41 1 1 4 49. Zoning regulations Vf?ry Sat i sf i ed Së.-\t i sf i ed Dissatisfied 'Very Dissatisfied FREQUEt"C'{ 4 38 25 4 . F'ERCENT 8.45 Be). 28 9.86 1.41 F'ERCENT 24.66 63. () 1 12.33 (). ()() F'ERCEt-JT 25.33 54.67 1 4. 6 7" 5. 33. F'ERCEt"T 5.63 53.52 35.21 5.63 /0 Over-all- Haltom City, Richland Hills, North Richland Hills and Watauga. . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS 1. Beautification/litter control \Jery Sat i s·f i ed Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 8 11 () 74 14 2. Emergency ambulance services FREQUENCY Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 37 136 15 6 3. Fire . V~ry Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUEt~CY 51 141 8 I"") ..:.. 4. Flood control Very S¿,tisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREC!UENCY 14 114 6() 18 5. Garbage sanitation FREQUEt.JCY Very Së\t i sf i ed Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 37 135 24 8 . F'ERCENT 3.88 53.4() 35.92 6. 8e) PERCEt~T 19. 07·~ 70.10_ 7.73 3.09 F'ERCEt~T 25.25 69 . 8C) 3.96 0.99 F'ERCEr~T 6. Be) 55.34 29.13 8.74 F'ERCENT 18.14 66.18 11.76 3.92 . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS 6. Hazardous waste disposal Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 9 124 22 14 7. Highway/street development FREQUENCY Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied -=!" .-' 66 83 58 8. Medical FREQUEt"CY . Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 3 ~" ..::..::. 155 26 9. Police FREQUENCY Very Satisfied Satisfied Di ssat i sf i eel Very Dissatisfied 52 114 34 8 10. Public transpDrtation Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 8 81 61 47 . F'ERCEt,JT c::- -=!'-=!" ~. -'-' 73.37 13. ()2 8.28 F'ERCEt"JT 1.43 31.43 39.52 27.62 PERCENT 1 (J. 68 75.24 12.62 1.46 F'ERCENT 25. (J() 54.81 16.35 3.85 F'ERCEt"T 4 . ()6 41.12 3().96 23.86 ?-- . QUAL I TV OF L I V I I'JG SLIF:\/EY REStJL TS 11. Sewer 'Jery Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 17 137 34 12. Utility rates 21 13. Water . Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJEt~CY C'" ,.J 67 93 48 Very- Sati sf i ed Sat i-sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 9 113 47 14. Employment services 23 Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 4 118 31 15. Job training programs 5 . Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 4 1 c)6 -:r C" ...;. ,.J 8 F'ERCEt~T 8.13 65.55 16.27 1 (). (> 5 F'ERCEt"T ,., '":!"C" L. _...J 31.46 43.66 22.54 F'ERCENT 4.69 58.85 24.48 11.98 F'ERCENT ,., C"-=!" ... ...J_' 74.68 19.62 3.16 F'ERCEt~T 2.61 69.28 22.88 c- '":''":!" ...J . ...._, 8 . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS 16. Community social services Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQLJEt~CY 15 159 16 1 17. Public image/visibility Very Satisfied Satisfied Di ss¿,t i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 16 134 33 11 18. Religious education FREQUEt"C'( . \lery Sat i sf i ed Såtisfied Di ss¿,t i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied 158 9 4 -. ..,. .;. ...;, 19. Worship opportunities FREQUENCY Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied C''ã û..;;. 11+3 "T 0_' 1 20. Youth activities \ler-y' Sati sf i eel Satisfie'd Di SS¿tt i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQUEt,JCY 19 138 26 4 . F'ERCENT 7.85 83.25 8.38 0.52 F'ERCEr"r 8.25 69 . ()7 1 7 . () 1 5.67 F'ERCEt"T 11.86 81.44 4.64 2. ()6 F'ERCENT. 26.13 71.86 1. 51 (). 5C) F'ERCENT 1 (). 1 6 73. BC) 13 . 9() 2.14 . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS 21. Alcohol education Very' Sat i sf i ed Sé7ttisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREG~UEf\JCY 8 12() 38 12 22. Alcohol control ....lery Sat i sf i ed Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUEr~CY 11 1 ()6 44 19 23. Crime control/citizen help . V~ry Satis"fied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 17 1 ()7 C" c:- ~-, 9 24. Drug education Very S¿tt i sf i ed S,-,t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY EJ 95 59 16 25. DrLlg corJtrol Ver-y' Sati sf i ed Së.it i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied f:" REQUENC'{" 4 94 57 ,.,-:r ..:.. -' . F'ERCENT 4.49 67.42 21 . 35 6.74 F'ERCEt~T 6. 11 58.89 24.44 1 (). 56 F'ERCEt~T 9 . ()4 56.91 29.26 4.79 F'ERCEr"T 4.49 53.37 33.15 8.99 F'ERCEt"T 2.25 52.81 32 . ()2 12.92 s . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS 26. Fire safety education Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 8 144 1"-\ c: ..:.:.~ 3 27. Law enforcement education Very Satisfied S':1t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 6 125 41 7 28. School patrol . V~ry Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 16 153 18 8 29. Street parking \,ery Sati~5fied Së:1t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUEt~CY 8 124 48 21 30. Traffic lights \lery' Bati sf i ed Sc.1t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREC}UEt~CY 16 127 38 2() . F'ERCENT 4.44 80. ()() 13.89 1.67 F'ERCEr~T "':! -=!"C" w. _,,-, 69.83 22.91 3.91 F'ERCENT 8.21 78.46 9.23 4. 1 () F'ERCEt~T· 3.98 61.69 23.88 10.45 F'ERCENT 7.96 63.18 18.91 9.95 ~ . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS 31. College course offerings Ver~i Sat i sf i ed Satisfied Di ssat i sf i e(j Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 31 1 J~Cì 19 2 32. Continuing adult education \"ery Satisfied Satisfied Di ssat. i ~5f i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 32 141 ,.,,., ..:.. .... 1 33. Parochial schools . \iery Sat i sf i ed Sãtisfied Di SSctti ~~f i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQUEt~CY 12 156 7 1 34. Private schools Ver)r' Satisfied Sc:.1t i sf i ed Di SSc:it i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQUEr~CY 11"') ..:.. 15() 2() ~ '-' 35. Public school system Vet-"¡ Sati sf i ed Satisfied Di SSètt i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied 1= F\ E C~ LJ E J\~ C '( 24 13() 31 1 1 . ~ \.~; j. 'ft. .." . ," . ,. F'ERCEt~T 15.42 74.1:3 9.45 1 . () () F'ERCEt~T 16.33 71.94 11 . 22 ().51 F'ERCEI'~T 6.82 88.64 3.98 (). 57 F'ERCEr~T 6.49 81 . ()8 1 (). 81 1.62 F'ERCEt··JT 12. 2"1- 66.33 15.82 5.61 '1 . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS 36. Cultural arts Very Sc:lt i sf i ed Sé1"t i s·f i ed Di ss.at i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQlJEJ~-JCY 7 94 45 12 37. Child è,bLIse Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied V€~r-·' Di ssat i sf i ed FREQUEr~CY 6 1 ()4 +2 6 38 . Cr, i 1 (j c: ar e FREQlJEr·~CY . Ver'y' Satisfied Sãtisfied Di ss¿,t i sf i E·d Very Dissatisfied 4 13 1 ..., ~ .... ....1 2() 39.. El der-l '1' "iery Satisfie(j Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREC!lJENCY 6 1 ()6 37 11 "'f(). Har,di capped Ver'y'Satisfied Së:\t i sf i ed Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied r=REQUENCY 6 115 31 8 . F'ERCENT 4.43 59. 4', 28.48 7.59 F'ERCEr~T 3. Be) 65.82 26.58 3. B() F'ERCENT 8. 1:::: 76.88 1 2 . 5() 2 . 5C) F'ERCEr"T. 3.75 66.25 23.13 6.88 F'ERCEt'JT 3.75 71.88 19.38 5 . () () 8 . QUALITY OF LIVING SURVEY RESULTS 41. Rehabilit<;.~tion Ver"i Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQLJEr~CY 6 11 () --=:- ~ ...1 _-.' 7 42 . '( 0 L\ t t-. \iery Satisfied Satisfie·d Di SSëlt i sf i ed Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 7 1 ()6 36 6 43. Recreation resources . Vi=ry Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQlJENCY 15 1 () 1 54 14 44. Park development Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied V~ry Dissatisfied FREC)UEr~CY 14 93 58 2C) 45. Business development \"ery Satisfied SatisfiE·d Dissat.isfied Very Dissatisfied FREQLJEr~C\{ 17 131 28 1 1 . F'ERCEr~JT 3.85 7C). 51 21.15 4.49 F'ERCEr.JT 4.52 68.39 2::::~. 23 3.87 F'ERCEt-JT 8.15 54.89 29.35 7.61 F'ERCENT 7.57 5C>.27 31.35 1().81 F'ERCE~JT 9 . ()(;> 7C). ()5 14.97 5.88 .. I . C!LJAL I TV OF L I tJ I NG SUR\lE\( RESlJL T"S 46. Industrial development \iery Sat i sf i ed Sëitisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREG;!LJEt~CY 16 141 21 8 47. Mall developments Ver"y Sati sf i ed Satisfied Di ssat i sf i E,d Very Dissatisfied FREQUEt~CY 33 1,,'":) -- 28 7 48. RestaLlrants . \Jery Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied FREQUENCY 28 1 ()2 42 ..., ,., ~ ..:.. 49. Zoning regulations Very' Satisfied Satisfied Di ssat. i !~f i ed Very Dissatisfied FREC!lJEI'~CY 8 1 (>4 i1- (~ 19 . F·ERCENT 8. 6e) 75.81 11.29 4. 3 () F'ERCEt~T 17.37 64..21 14.74 3.68 F'ERCEt~T 14.43 52.58 21.65 11 . 34 F'ERCENT 4.44 57.78 27.22 1 (> . 56" Ie ,. DATE: October 20, 1983 r~ ;/ ....... ....... : .JEc:r :. . , PZ 83-54 Appeal Hearirii for Zoning Request from Agriculture to Industrial on a portion of Tract 4, T. Akers Sùrvey·, Abstract 19 DEPARTMENT : Planning and Zoning . . . BACKG.ROUND : This pro?ertv- is located on the railroad DrODertv on the north side of Northeast Loop 820. ""t . . There was only one property owner contacted and there was no one who spoke in opposition. M & W Investments wish to install a ,billboard o~ this property. Their metes ~nd bounds description shows the pròperty in question to extend to the middle of the roadway. The property is not platted. . . The Planning and Zoning Co~ission had a- motion to approve this reques.t with the stipulation - - they provide the City Staff with a revised plat, b~t the mötion failed to pa~ for a lack of a majority-vote. The vote was 2-2 with Mr. Bowen and Ms. Nash voting against approval. CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning-request. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: NI A __________________~___________________________________________~~ /J_ ð_.~ ~ --------~~------ . (" . Ã'- ,V Brad L. Wilemon M & W Investments Robert W. Mahoney September 6, ·1983 Mr. Roger Line Cìty ~anager City.pf North Richland Hills P.o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. Line, . On August 25, 1983 our zoning case 'number PZ 83-54 was denied due to a tied vote of 2-2. We at this -time request an appeal hearing at the earliest possible date. Thank yo~ for your time and consideration of this request. Sincerely, M & W INVESTMENTS (I. ~ ÆJ~ c. Kirk Nance CKN:klb . M . W Advertising, Inc. · M & W Development Co. . ExServ Co. 1211 South Bowen, Suite 212 · Arlington, Texas 76013 . 81 7/265- 7095 / 461-1600 ,. ,. . ~/. . . Page 18 ( p & Z Minutes . August 25, 1983 PZ 83-52 APPROVED 15. PZ 83-54 Mrs. Calvert stated she had recei~ a letter from Mrs. Frances Ball ,7812 Emerald Hills Way, who is ainst this zoning request and ~ "S it should stay zoned for ~~tle family dwellings. ,,#~~:~ ,:-:-::' ,:..' Chai~an Tucker closed the Public , Hearing. .-It Mr. Bowen said he does not feel property on Davis Boulevard should stay single family and he believes Local Retail is the logical zoning classification for this property. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 83-52. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. Request of M & W Investments to rezone a portion of Tract 4, T. Akers Survey, Abstract 19, from its present classifi~ation of Agriculture to a proposed-classification of Ind~strial. This property is located on the railroad property on the north side of Northeast Loop 820. :. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Kirk Nance with M & W Investments came forward. He said they are requesting Industrial zoning since there is a large tract adjacent to this property that is zoned Industrial. Mr. Nance said they want to put up a billboard on the railroad property which had not been zoned. Mr. Hannon said their description shows they are requesting to go out to the center line of the Freeway. Mr. Nance said that was the metes and bounds given them by the railroad, but they plan to put the billboard on the railroad property. " . -.;;.. >". ;~ - . ~_. :::~ . ., . "'-" 1t, c:.·~ .. .. Page 19 P & Z Minutes August 25, 1983 Mr. Hannon asked how and where do they plan to put the sig~. Mr. Nance said the sign would require about 12 feet and they plan to put it close to the eas'tern line. He said the railroad has a 100 foot wide right of way. Mr. Hannon asked what size sign were they planning to put up. Mr. Nance said it would be 14 feet by 48 feet and 50 feet high. Councilman Davis said they need to take into consideration that they would also be required to plat the property and would be required to meet the Industrial zoning requirements. Chairman Tucker said platting has nothing~to do with a zoning request. -. Chairmau~Davis said the City CÕuncil just had a request to put up a billboard and the City Council-. postponed it because the property had to be platted. - ~- ~:..:. - Chairman Tucker" called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing~ c PZ 83-54 DENIED Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PZ 83-54 with the stipulation they provide the City Staff with a revised plat. This motion was seconded by Chairman Tucker. The motion -failed by a vote of 2-2 with Mr. Bowen and Ms. Nash voting against approval. The request failed to pass for a lack of a majority vote. . City of ~orth 1ticWand Hills '\s/l~ )~ Star of the ~etroplex \f TO: Planning & Zoning Commission REF: P'~i-0041-83 FROM: Gene Riddle, Director Public Works DATE: August 18, 1983 SUBJECT: Meeting of August 25, 1983 I have two other cases to make comments on concerning your meeting in August. The first case concerns the final plat of Holiday North, Section 10. I would like to point out to you that the eastern portion of this plat is located on the east side of the creek and the only outlet for this portion of this plat is Circle Drive which is on someone else's property. However, there is a street dedication going north from this plat and then going east back down to Carolyn Drive. I would like to request that this developer be required to improve the street outlet before this plat can be used. . The next case I would like to comment on 1S zoning case PZ 83-54 and it concerns the zoning of the railroad track. They are proposing to zone the railroad to the center of the freeway and this could create two problems. -=. The first being that since the railroad probably has prior rights over the freeway right of way they could conceivably put a billboard sign hanging over the freeway. The second being along the service road on the north side of the freeway the city intends to construct a crossing at the railroad for the purpose of access to a piece of city property that lies west of the railroad. I recommend that you zone only that portion of the land which lies north of the state highway right of way. .~ e (817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. lOOP 820/ P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76118 . . . (' K NOWL TON-E NG LI S H-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 16, 1983 Planning &.Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-54, AGRIC. TO INDUSTRIAL, GRID 119 We have received ,the referenced zoning case··for our review and fincl that we could adequately locate ~his property on.~he zoning map should rt be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Cou·ncil. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORQ. TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 . (' douthern R.cmc Land Cornp...~ 13520 I nwood Road · Dallas, Texas 75234 . Telephone (214) 980-1464 c. R. .JOHNSTON REGIONAL MANAGER N. H. YAKLIN ASSISTANT REGIONAL MANACER June 21, 1983 SCOTT BOWLIN ASSISTANT REGIONAL MANACER GLEN R. REID LAND AGENT H. G. WALTER LAND AGENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS - Proposed Lease - M&W Investments . ..:. City of North Richland Hills Planning & Zoning Department Gentlemen: Please be advised that M&W Investments, 1211 S. Bowen, #212, Arlington, Texas 76013 has certain St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas property near Highway 820 under lease. In connection with the anticipated use of this property, M&W Investments is hereby authorized to secure at its own expense, the change of zoning from Unzoned (agricultural) to Industrial or any other designation compatible with intended.. use. Very truly yours, ~H~y:1~ SB/jw . Photo Sheet 1 Northeastern view of surrounding area Northwestern view of surrounding area Western view of surrounding area ~~~:: . -í,£i.~;: ': ..._~ .....- ... . þ ,ø- .il~ .~Hig~> . ;-'~,~.::~~; :~f:.~::-'~ . . . . '. . ~ . .. ,...~.. ~ ~t~~?~~··- -~ -~' -~~~~f~':/- - - .... - -- "-,'. ...........--. . ~..._- ~-.......... -......--... - .. -~ ~:~'-f\".... ~ : . ............. ~--.;.~~~.... ~-~ ----- ....;.. ~~?-:::l.-.~~:"~:':': ~.. . ..:.:~,~.~~ ' ...... .'..~-- . ~i;·:~.~~·"~ ~- ~:.':V=.""'-:- -- . . ~;~- ~....-,..-..- - ..-~ ..--' 'V~""" .... .: .~-.tL ...~ ~." Photo Sheet 2 Southwestern view of sUrrounding area Southern view of: surrounding area Southeastern view of surrounding area .~ ~ " r ':-t.:' t ~.~ ",. \ . ··....\.u !\... .. ~.. .' ! . ".. t . '"" :1t ~ ~</ /? ~~ )- ~ \ ~ -... .~.................~_... Z -i rr1 ::0 (f) -i ~ ~ ~ ~ t¡' , ~ )(. ~ -i rr1 ~ ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ .... , f:. " ;"ð8 ~'" Ch ~ . . . . EXHIBIT "A" NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS A tract of land in the T. Ackers Survey, Tarrant County, Texas, said tract being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection of the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas Mt. Pleasant to Ft. Worth main track and Interstate Highway 820; Thence West, along the centerline of Interstate Highway 820, 58.795 feet to the Place of Beginning Proper for this description; Thence North 31°33' East along the westerly St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company property line, 500 feet; Thence East, 117.59 feet; Thence South 31°33' West, along the easterly St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas Property Line, 500 feet; Thence West, 117.58 feet to the Place of Beginning Proper, containing 1.15 acres of land, more or less. . ORPINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-54 the following described property shall NOT BE rezoned from Agriculture to Industrial. BEING a tract of land in the T. Ackers Survey, Tarrant County, Texas, said tract being more particularly described as f~llows: . BEGINNING at the centerline intersection of tbe St. Louis Southwesté~n Railway Company of Texas Mt. Pleasant to Ft. Worth main tract and Interstate Highway 820: -. THENCE West, along the centerline of Interstate Highway 820, 58.795 ìeet to the Place of Beginning proper for this description; THENCE North 31 degrees 33 minutes East along the westerly St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company property line, 500 feet; THENCE East, 117.59 feet; THENCE South 31 degrees 33 minutes West, along the easterly St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas property line, 500 feet; THENCE West, 117.58 feet the the Place of Beginning property, containing 1.15 acres of land, more or less. . . . e- 9 DATE: 1'-21-'3 ~ SUBJECT: Final Plat .f L.t 1, BI..k 1, .. J. Anàersen Su..ivisien DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Planning and Zoning The developer's architect has satisfied all of the items of Richard Albin's letter dated October 18, 1983 with the exception of some minor changes on the water line construction plans. These pertain to items 6 and 7 of the engineer's letter and they will be corrected during the construction of this water line. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove the final plat of D. J. Anderson Subdivision. BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/ a NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: I~ r , ~\j ., . . . . ELTlt'G,AND RECeR ARCHITECTS · PLANNERS, INC. September 26, 1983 Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: Request to Appeal Planning and Zoning Ruling on PS83-100 and PS83-101 Dear Sir, As Representative of Dr. D. J. Anderson, I am requesting a hearing by the City Council at their next meeting on items PS83-100 and PS83-101 presented to the Planning and Zoning on September 22, 1983. These items were rejected due to certain omissions on the drawings. Our engineers H-H Consulting Engineers of Arlington have been instructed to comply with all comments and conditions stated in this meeting. I have talked with Mr. Gene Riddle and will work with him on resolving all of these comments prior to the meeting. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, Inc. THE/jaz cc: H-H Consulting Engineers Dr. D. J. Anderson PRINCIPALS: THOMAS H. ELTING A.I.A. HAROLD C. RECER A.I.A. 6633GRAPEVINEH\,yy. FORT WORTH, TEXAS, 76118 (817)284-2361 (- ( . KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas October 18, 1983 ~Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-972, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS D.J. ANDERSON SUBDIVISION, LOT 1, BLOCK 1, REVISED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANS PS 83-100/101, GRID 8,17 We.~ave reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: . 1. Utility companies should be contacted to ftetermine if any addit~9nal easements are required to serve this lot. ~ - 2. Plans for septic tank sewer system should be submitted to the County Health Department for review and approval, and the results of percolation tests should be furnished to the City before this development is approved. .: 3. We would suggest that the owner be required to pay his prorata share of a future 8-inch water line in Davis Blvd. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for a total length of 578.55 feet for one-half of an 8-inch line. 4. The Developer should be required to escrow his prorata share of future paving and drainage improvements on Davis Blvd. in accordance with Council Policy No.6. 5. Written permission should be obtained from the State Highway Department for any proposed construction within the Davis Blvd. right-af-way along the frontage of this development. A permit for construction of the proposed a-inch water line should also be obtained. (Contact A.B. Anderson at 292-6510, X-296). 6. The existing 24-inch water line in Davis Blvd. is ductile iron rather than concrete steel cylinder--the tapping note on the water layout plan should be revised accordingly. e October 18, 1983 PS 83-100 and 101 PAGE 1 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283.6211. METR0/267-3367 . . . ~- I ~ ~ 7. A tapping sleeve should not be required on the proposed fire hydrant assembly at approx. Sta. 3+60. A flanged Tee and flanged gate valve will be required, however. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please. do not hesitate to call. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works - - October 18, 1983 PS 83-100 and 101 PAGE 2 . . e ( ëLTlN3,åND ~ ARCHITECTS · PLANNERS, INC. October 12, 1983 Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Pub 1 i c Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-972, City of North Richland Hills D.J. Anderson Subdivisions Lot 1 & 2, Block 1, Preliminary and Final Plat, PS 83-100/101, Grid 8, 17 Dea rMr. Riddle: In answer to the September 14, 1983, comments from Knowlton- English-Flowers, Inc., Richard W. Albin, P.E., Items 1. Item 7.: through 6.: See Engineers plats~ See letter from Tarrant County Health Department from Lawrence C. Prine, R.S., Dated October 7, 1983, to Mr. Tom Harkness~ Owner has no objections. Owner has no objections. Owner will obtain permit from state highway department for right of way improvements prior to construction. I trust that this answers all of the comments that have been made concerning this project. If there ;s any question, do not hesitate to contact me on this project. I tern 8·.: I tern 9.: I tern 1 0 : Very truly yours, THE: 1 f PRINCIPALS: THOMAS H. ELTING A.I.A. HAROLD C. RECER A.I.A. 6633 GRAPEVINE HWY. FORT WORTH, TEXAS, 76118 (817) 284-2361 . ( ~" TARRANT CO UNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT t 800 UNIVER.,TY DRIVE FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76107 October 7, 1983 Mr. Tom Ha rkness Route 6, Box 51 Roanoke, Texas 76262 . Subject: Private sewage facility for the proposed Anderson Veterinary Clinic, located on 1.69 acres of land, at' the northwest corner of F.M. 1938 and Shady Grove Lane, North Richland Hills, Texas . Dear Mr. Harkness: -=- On October 4, 1983, an inspection of subject facility was made in the company of yourself and Dr. Bill Anderson. Subject facility has recently been renovated by Mr. Jack Sandlin in which a 500 gallon septic tank was added to an existing 500 gallon tank and 300 square feet of lateral line was installed. Previous1y, sub- ject private sewage facility served the 15 year-old building which is now being renovated for the clinic. . " Soils in the area of the newly installed lateral line are Gasil fine sandy loarns. and are suitable.for a leaching type disposal system. Dr. Anderson has operated a Veter~nary Clinic for many years uti- lizing a private sewage facility for sewage dIsposal and is aware of problems created by disposal of antibacterial compounds and other chemicals that affect septic tank function. Subject facil ity should be adequate for the proposed usage, wIth waste water loading rates equivalent to those experienced when the building was occupied previously. . This department will not require a soil percolation test or a per- mit for subject facility provided grade-compatible space is re- served for future repair if the need should arise, and surface Anderson Veterln, October 7, 1983 Page 2 ClInIc ./ . drainage is adequately controlled. If any additional information is needed, please advise. Sincerely, c4- f!e4 ~ Lawr~nce c. Prine, R.S. LCP/df . -=- . II' . . . . Page 7 P & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 .f( PS 83-96 APPIDVED 8. PS 83-99 83-99 APPlUlED 9. PS 83-100 10. PS 83-101 ~ t: r Ms. Nash made the IOOtion to approve PS 83-96 subject to .the Engineer's cannents and subject to changing e name of the addi tioD to MeadO\Weew Estates. This nDtion was sec ded by Mr. Bemen and the DX>tion ca ied 5-0. Request of D. E. Pentec st for final plat of Holiday Nbrt Section.ll. Ernest Hedgcoth, nsul ting Engineer, came forward to epresent Mr. Pentecost. H stated they had received th City Engineer's cannents and will e the necessa~ correct e ns. Mr. Hedgcoth said they will nstruct a 12 inch water line wit the city's participation in the o rsizing of an 8 inch line. He said hey will pay their pro rata share of the existing sewer line. l\1r. Hannon asked where the bounda~ 1 ine was- for Lot 2. --- ~ l\1r. Hedgcoth said it was the eastern bounda~ of the drainage easement. l\1r.Hannon said he needs heavièr lines showing the division of the lots and also, he needs to put the monuments at the corners. l\1r. Hedgcoth said he wi-II do that. l\1r. Hannon made the IOOtion to approve PS 83-99 subject to the Engineer's cannents and further subject to the Engineer showing the lot 1 ines and Ironunents on the plat. This rrotion was seconded by 1\-18. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Qlairman Thcker stated the Cmmission will hear the next two requests together. Reques t of Dr. D. J. Anderson for prelimina~ plat of Lot 1, Block 1, D. J. Anderson Subdivision. Request of Dr. D. J. Anderson for final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, D. J. Anderson Subdivision. Page 8 P & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 . Thanas El t ing, Archi tect, came fOIWard to represent Dr. Anderson. He said they had received the City Engineer's letter and they have no objection to the cooments, but would like to ask a question, will all the other property owners be required to pay for the water line. Mr. Bronstad said they will when the water line is extended. Mr. Elting said, then, they have no objections to the comments. Mr. Bowen asked if they had subnitted any water plans. Mr. Elting said Cblleyville is presently serving this property water. . Mr. Bronstad said we can not extend more th~ 100 feet. He said this city does not -serve anyone north of --.:shady Grove Roild, they are served either by Keller or Cblleyvi lIe. Mr. Bronstad said in order for North Richland Hills to serve than we would have to obtain a release fran the PlC. Mr. Hannon said they must provide fire protection. Mr. Hannon said he has problems wi th this preliminary and final plat. He said they do not meet North Richland Hi lIs' Subdivision Ordinance. Mr. Hannon said their Engineer needs to purchase a North Richland Hills Subdivision Ordinance and redo these plats. He showed Mr. EI ting the problems. PS 83-100 D~IED Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 83-100. This I1Dtion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the nx>tion to deny carried 5-0. . PS 83-101 DENIED Mr. Hannon made the root ion to deny 'ps 83-101. This IOOtion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the root ion to deny carried 5-0. . . . ( KNOWLTON-ENGUSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 14, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-972, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS D.J. ANDERSON SUBDIVISION, LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT, PS 83-100/101, GRID 8,17 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. The Owner's A~knowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed b~fore approval of this·=plat. - - 2. In accordance with County requirements,~property corner monumentation should be noted on the plåt. ;. The telephone number of the Owner/Developer should be noted on~he plat. 4. The existing zoning of this development should be noted on the plat. 5. Utility companies should be contacted to determine if any easements are required to serve this lot. 6. Water system improvements plans should be submitted for review before this development is approved. 7. Plans for septic tank sewer system should be submitted to the County Health Department for review and approval, and the results of percolation tests should be furnished to the City before this development is approved. 8. We would suggest that the owner be required to pay his prorata share of a future 8-inch water line in Davis Blvd. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for a total length of 578.55 feet for one-half of an 8-inch line. 9. The Developer should be required to escrow his prorata share of future paving and drainage improvements on Davis Blvd. in September 14, 1983 PS 83-100 and 101 PAGE SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267·3367 . . . /" { \ ( accordance with Council Policy No.6. 10. Written permission should be obtained from the State Highway Department for any proposed construction within the Davis Blvd. right-of-way along the frontage of this development. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW AI ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ~ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Work~_ Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works September 14, 1983 PS 83-100 and 101 PAGE 2 . '. . City of j\(órth Richland Hills, Texas ~ TO: Rodger Line City Manager DATE: October 20, 1983 FROM: Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Platting & Zoning Cases for City Council October 24, 1983 PZ 83-56 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Olen Beck with Lolita's Mexican Restaurant to rezone a portion of Lot 4R-2, Block 10, Snow Heights North Addition, from its present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive and approximately 340 feet north of Meadowcrest Drive. PZ 83-57 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Jack S. Cook to rezone Tract 2GIA, John McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of IF-9-1500 One Family Dwellings. This property is located on the north side of Odell Street and approximately 300 feet west of Smithfield Road. PZ 83-59 APPROVED BY P & Z Request of Folsom Investments, Inc. to remove the Flood Plain designation from the City Zoning Map on portion of Walkers Branch Addition. This property is located at the northwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Harwood Road. (817) 281-Q041n301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TX 76118 To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records DATE: October 20, 1983 : .BJECT :. PZ 83-56 Zoning request from Local Retail to Local Retail-SU-Sal'e of Alcoholic Bev. on a portion! '0£ Lot 4R-2, Block 10-, Snow' Heights North Addition. DEPARTMENT : Planning and Zoning BACKGJtOUND: This property is located on th'e east side of Rufe Snow Drive and approximately 340 £ eet north of Meadowcrest Drive. It is for a Mexican Resi:aur~nt lo'catecl in Burk Collins' ~ .. shopp'ing center. There was only one property owner contacted a·nd no one contes,ted the change. . . ".The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval o~ this zoning requëst. -- .. -~. CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning -request. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/ A ------------------~-------------------------------------------~-~--~~~~ .. .. Page 11 P & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 ( / ~ . Mr. Wright said that was correct. He said this is a triangular shaped lot and TESCO already has lines across each side and across the front, th they go down Harwood Road and Hi way 26 to serve the others. Mr. W ght said they feel TESCO just sa a chance to get another easement an they do not feel they need this ditional easement. Mr. Hannon said i probably is needed to serve the pr erty next door. Mr. Wright the existing property is being without the easement now, bu if the Commission says they must gree to the easement, they will. . airman Tucker asked if they had contacted TESCO about the need for the easement. Mr. Wri~ht said they had not. Chairman Tucker said for Mr. Wright to have his engineer get with TESCþ and if TESCO states the easement is not needed, that will be fine with~he Commission. Mr. Hannon said if the existing buildings on each side are already being served, he felt they probably would not need the easement. PS 83-103 APPROVED Mr. Hannon made the motion to approve PS 83-103 subject to the Engineer's comments #1, 2, 3, & 4 of the letter dated September 14, 1983. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. 13. PZ 83-56 Request of Olen Beck with Lolita's Mexican Restaurant to rezone a portion of Lot 4R2, Block 10, Snow Heights North Addition, from its present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive and approximately 340 feet north of Meadowcrest Drive. . ( Page 12 P & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 . . PZ 83-56 APPROVED 14. PZ 83-57 . ( Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Burk Collins, owner of the property, came forward. He stated that Mr. Beck presently has a restaurant in Haltom City and plans to relocate in North Richland Hills at this location. Mr. Collins said if the Specific Use is granted, it should be in the name of Olen Earl Beck. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bow~n made the motion to approve PZ 83-56. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Jack S. Cook to rezone Tract 2GIA, John McComas Survey~ Abstract 1040, from its present classification of Agriculture a proposed classification of -9-1500 One Family Dwellings. s property is located on the no side of Odell Street and appro · ately 300 feet west of Smithfiel oad. Tucker opened the Public H ing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Cook~ He stated that Mr. Cook desires to build some residences on his property in the future. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. ",- .- ( ( " i . , . . . KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 13, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-56, LOCAL RETAIL TO LOCAL RETAIL- SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF ALCHO. BEV. GRID 112 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be-passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. -- ... ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 fz- f3-5Z . ~ ~ ~ 389°34<E c39981 - -D-- Nt rt) ~89()3:3'33/~ · 0 - / 3~ .,¿¡:-/ \.S\~ . - ' 0 -, - 0 /3/ 091 ...' . -. ' ~ ~. /..J .. 3? " " ' . , ' . , '.,' , ',' ~ ~ : · . . 0 '0 00 . - '" ~ ~ 0_ . .' . .' 0 ,,' #', 0,. ~ C) .~ ~ \) . , . " - 0 co~c' , " " , ,:, > ~~' c 303 S,. ~- ~ o . . {) ...., 4): ,', , " " ',,' I) T: ~ ' , ,.," .' Sl-/1 [5, .' , '" ~ + " ~: "','.': ,:, ' " ,', " :. :.: ' ,},'6., O./ZZ Ac;.- ~ ~ '. 0.·.. Q(J) (fj . \'\ ~ -..;; .' ,.... 0 .'. 0 'If " \y . " , ' ',' ',..', ~i.4:'O~' .:,: : ,', ~ :\fJ;1I 'l!J0' n\~ ~ ~ ' , '" "., ' r. oo«tJ(p ~ ((.~~ ~':~-'-..:>. ~9J,i?' 53.0' ~ /L '" / - ~- '1"'" \; 6'_ , " 'Y~!!~3?'1-3'~ ,: I ,,-( '\ ' ; ~ .: :'~ ':. : ' '~ ':' . ' " .. :, . , : ~ '..' ~ ~ CIj ~ ~ \J ~ ~ . ~ ~ ." - - . . . . ". " ~ \/-- J- \ ,..., \.,¿> /50.01 : ) \ " ,. I) /' ,/ ( ,.., ,.I' I \.. .. " o ~ " ,/ ,/ -) -,ï - / '- - - / , / " C) ~ B¿ÐG. 2.5/ /50.0/ .M£AOOWC/<ES T D~/l/E DESCRIPITOO OF ffiCPERfY 0.122 ACRES -, I ?f ~ ~I \() !J~.8' "- ~ I~ ~ I'} r , ~_I ~ ~\9 (\j . I ~ &A'¿E I I /"=~ I ~~~t\o (,o~A!¿~ ~ 01 \/0.. ~ v 17 SDlJAllD in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portiæ of lot 4R-2, Block 10, srov HEIans OORIH, an aidition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to Plat recorded in Voluœ 388-162, Page 71, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being IOOre p<lrticularly described as follows: CX}f.flClr-G at a point which bears North 89 degrees 42 minutes 14 seconds West, 32.6 feet and North 0 degrees 24 minutes 17 seconds Fast, 30.0 feet fran the Southeast comer of said Lot 4R-2, Block 10; 'fHEN.:E North 0 degrees 24 minutes 17 seconds Fast, 310.13 feet along the edge of a concrete slab to a point for corner, the fl...ÞCE œ BEGINNOC of the tract herein being described; 1l-/EN..:E North 89 degrees 35 minutes 43 seconds West, 53.0 feet to a point for corner; 1lIEN::E South 50 degrees 02 minutes 48 seconds West, 15.06 feet to a point for corner; 'I1-IEN::E North 44 degrees 26 minutes 43 seconds West, 31.17 feet to a point for corner; 'I1OCE North 37 degrees 09 minutes 12 seconds Fast, 30.33 feet to a point for corner; 'IlÐI:;E North 0 degrees 26 minutes 27 seconds Fast, 4O.œ feet to a point for corner; TIIEN:E South 89 degrees 33 minutes 33 seconds Fast, 39.75 feet to a point for corner; 1HENCE South 44 degrees 30 minutes 31 seconds Fast, 40.33 feet to a poiI1t for corner; TIIEN:E South 0 degrees 24 minutes 17 secÜlIÛS West, 48.00 feet to the fl...ÞCE œ ŒGINNIM; and containing 5,X>3 square feet, or 0.122 acres, IIDre or less. . A¿..tGt/..5T ¿ 1<3J83 EX, NC. IEGISTEIED PUBLIC SURVEYORS .- .. H (f FIN G TON .... ,~Þ~IIt~ 4Þ...~................).." .. I. A. HE"Jlm. ,. ,.../.............. ..,..., '~ 38~. ..~ . ~ 'i9....,..,~ t ~.r'ø··,U· ~. .'.. 3001 RACE STREET f! O. Be. 7021 fORT WOITH ,TEXAS 76111 .17/834,74.1 ~,- II . ORDINANCE NO. {O 1 , AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~D THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-56 the following described property shall be rezoned from Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. Situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of Lot 4R-2, Block 10, Snow Heights North, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to Plat recorded in Volume 388-162, Page 71, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: -- . COMMENCING at a point which bears North 89 degrees 42 minutes 14 seconds West, 32.6 feet and North 0 degrees 24 minutès 17 seconds East, 30.e feet from the Southeast corner of said Lot 4R-2, Block 10: ~ THENCE North 0 degrees 24 minutes 17 seconds East, 310.13 feet along the edge of a concrete slab to a point for corner, the PLACE OF BEGINNING of the tract herein being described; THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes 43 seconds West, 53.0 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 50 degrees 02 minutes 48 seconds West, 15.06 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 44 degrees 26 minutes 43 seconds West, 31.17 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 37 degrees 09 minutes 12 seconds East, 30.33 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 0 degrees 26 minutes 27 seconds East, 40.08 feet to a point for corner; . THENCE South 89 degrees 33 minutes 33 seconds East, 39.75 feet to a point for corner; DATE: October 20, 1983 . / r:?-" ~ : .JECT~ PZ 83-57 Zoning ReQu"est from A'2riculture to IF-9-1500-One Family Dwellinis on . , Tract 2G1Å; John McComas Survey, Abstract 1040. .. DEP ARTMENT : Planning and Zoning BACKG~OUND: This property' is located on the north side of Odell Street, approximately 300 feet . " west of Smithfield Road. .,. . . . . The owner wishes to build some single family residences on his property in the future. . . . . " There were 22 property owners contac·ted, but no ·one came to speak in. opposit;o~ to the request . . The Planning. and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 4-1 with Ms. Nash voting against approval. . . .. - - - . - -1. . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO x ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A -- . ~~.~ ~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... ~ Page 12 ( p & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 · · 14. PZ 83-57 · Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wish! to speak in favor of this reque to please come forward. Burk Collins, owner 0 he property, came forward. He ated that Mr. Beck presently has a estaurant in Haltom City and pI to relocate in North lls at this location. ollins said if the Specific Use granted, it should be in the name Olen Earl Beck. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 83-5b. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Jack S. Cook to reZQne Tract 2G1A, John McComas SurveŸ~ Abstract 1040, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of IF-9-1500 One Family Dwellings. This property is located on the north side of Odell Street and approximately 300 feet west of Smithfield Road. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer; came forward to represent Mr. Cook~ He stated that Mr. Cook desires to build some residences on his property in the future. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. ( Page 13 p & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 . PZ 83-57 APPROVED 15. PZ 83-58 . 1/ I, "' There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed .the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 83-57 as requested. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the motion carried 4-1 with Ms. Nash voting against. Request of David Autrey to rezone Tract 2GIA1, John McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from its present classification of Agriculture to a proposed classification of IF-9-1 ° One Family Dwelling. This proB ty is located on the north side of äell Street and approximately 2 feet west of Smithfield Road. Chairman Tucker open the Public Hearing and called or those wishing to speak in favo of this request to please ~ome fo ard. Mr. Hannon aid this request does not the F-9 zoning requiremeri; of s are foot lot; they only have imately 7000 square feet;- He it also does not meet the depth width requirement of 110 feet deep 70 feet wide. . Mr. Hannon said he did not feel this Commission should hear this' case. Councilman Davis said since the notices were sent out, he feels they should have the Public Hearing. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Autrey. He said he did not realize until he started to leave his office today that it did not meet the requirement. Chairman Tucker said it does not meet the requirement for 1F-9 nor 1F-8 zoning and we no longer have 1F-7. He said the Planning and Zoning Commission has no choice. ¡" \ " /0- f \ , " . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 13, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 83-57, AGRICULTURE TO 1F-9-1500, GRID 69 --.- _..__...............;"" -- We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we coulª adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commi~sion and the City Counc~l. .. .~._~ .~._.- .....,. -......,. -- ...__. ..---:.--:"'-'-- .... - ¡2¡~1 RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works . 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 .. ~ . . I " . I L 0 C K . D 0& T '0 .. . I"'.",OOD ··-Ld ,.-- . --- ",,-0 E , . 3-. . T 0.51' ---- ... , ~ ~ . ~ I ¡ 1&.1 ~ .. ~ ~ II) --- --I .. ~::¡ : ...¡.,, .. · 8 ,-- ... Ii ~ s!1 -.I..., ~ i ~ ~_.- ,." S6'~: J'.. ,' -.. .- t'E.E.1 \.. \.. ~" ~,,__o~ . ." ..: .i o 4: VICINITY M-AP N.T.S. Tr act 2G 1 A. John McComal 8urv ey. Abat. No. 10.40. . -- ----. - - -.-- .. - -------.----.. -....- - - - . ... METES & BOUNDS . SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas) and being a tract of land out of the John McComas Survey, Abst. 1040, and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a point in the North Right-of-Way line of Odell Street, said point also being the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 1 MOLLIE B. COLLINS ADDITION, as recorded in Vol. 388-108, page 33, D.R.T.C.T; THENCE North 01°18' East) along the East property line of said Lot 4) a distance of 148.24 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 86°00' East, a distance of 183.5 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00°40' East, a distance of 101.2 feet to a point for corner) said point also being in the North line of Odell Street; THENCE South 72°19' West along said North line of Odell Street a distance of 196.9 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 0.529 acres of land. . ORDINANCE NO. (f) 7 ~ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-57 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to IF-9-1500-0ne Family Dwellings. SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a tract of land out of the John McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, and being more particularly described as follows; . BEGINNING at a point in the North right of way line of Odell Street, said point also being the Southeast corner of Lot~4, Block 1, Mollie B. Collins Addition, as recorded in Volume 388-108, Page 33, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; -.. THENCE North 01 degrees 18 minutes East, along the East property liiè of said Lot 4, a distance of 148.24 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 86 degrees 00 minutes East, a distance of 183.5 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 40 minutes East, a distance of 101.2 feet to a point for corner, said point also being in the North line of Odell Street; THENCE South 72 degrees 19 minutes West along said North line of Odell Street a distance of 196.9 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 0.529 acres of land. . October 21, 1983 DATE: --....... : eJECT :. PZ 83-59 Request of Folsom Inv'estrnents to remove the Flood Plain des:i:gnation from the City Zoning Map on portions of·Walkers Branch Addition. DEPARTMENT : Planning and Zoning BACKG.ROUND : This pro~ertv'is located at the northwest corner of Grapevine Hi~hwav and Harwood Roåd. ,. There were'6 property owners contacted. There were several who wer'e concerned that the wO'rk done on the property had not caused any relief to flooa·iIÍg down stream. . The Planning and Zoning Connnission .}:"ecomrilended approval of this request by å vote of 3-1 with Ms. Na~h voting against the approval and MI. Hannon abstained. . - - '1. CITY COUNCIL A~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of request BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A¡ ..2f~. e~ -~-~~-~~--~---~----~-~-~-~--~---~---~~~-~-~----~-~~-~~-~---~----~---~--~~-~----~~---~---~~~ ... ~ Page 15 ( p & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 . PZ 83-58 D~IID 16. PS 83-97 PS 83-97 D~Irn 17. PS 83-98 18. PZ 83-59 . . (' Mr. Hannon made the motion to den PZ 83-58. This motion was se ed by Ms. Nash and the motion c ied 5-0. of D.L. rey for preliminary Lot ,Block 1, Mollie B. it ion. . Hannon made the motion to deny PS 83-97. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 5-0. Request of D.L. Autrey for final plat of Lot 5, Block 1, Mollie B. Collins Addition. Mr. Hannon made the motion to deny PS 83-98. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and' the motion carried 5-0. Request of Folsom Investments, Inc. to remove the Flood Plain designation from the zoning map on portions of Walkers~Branch Addition. This propertÿ is located at the northwest corner of Grapevine Highway an~ Harwood Road. - Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Gordon Swift, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Folsom Investments. He stated they want to clean up the action in Walkers Branch. Mr. Swift stated the preliminary for this property was approved August, 1979 and the final was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission December, 1981 and by the City Council January, 1982 and then recorded. Mr. Swift said after doing all the work on this property, the Flood Plain had been redesigned. He said after having a meeting with the City Staff, they found they needed to correct the City's Zoning Map. Mr. Swift said this plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer and City Staff and they recommended they do this. I Page 16 ( P & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 i I \ . Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in.opposition to this request to please come forward. J. D. Lunsford, 3816 Diamond Loch East, came forward. He said he owns some property across from Fox Rental which is adjacent to this property. Mr. Lunsford said with this realignment, he feels they have diverted more water than ever which has to go through 6 to 8 foot culverts. He asked what was going to be done about this. Councilman Davis stated there is a Capital Improvement Program for Richland Oaks area. He stated there is a problem at the intersection of Harwood Road and Grapevine Highway which is not controlled by the city. Councilman Davis said, hopefully, the flooding will be taken care of with the new concrete-lined channels. ~ . Mr. Lunsford asked if there would be construction within the existing Flood Plain. ~ Councilman Davis said there would be. Mr. Lunsford said what they have already done helped, but he is concerned about the effect this would have on his property. Mr. Hannon said this action will not allow Folsom to do anymore than he can already do; he is only redefining where the Flood Plain is. Councilman Davis showed Mr. Lunsford where the Flood Plain will be. . Mr. Lunsford said his concern was for the adjacent property owners. He said he had talked to the Corp of Engineers and they still show this area in the Flood Plain. Mr. Lunsford asked if the property owners would have any recourse if this does not work. He said he felt this was compounding their problem. Page 17 ( p & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 . Mr. Hannon said if we have made a mistake, you have recourse to the city and the developer, but he feels the city is making an effort to eliminate the problem. Mr. Lunsford said they may make it work now, but he is concerned for later when all the apartments are built and with all the asphalt. Councilman Davis said he felt the city is doing everything they can to correct the problem. Ann Robinson who lives in Richland Oaks, came forward. She asked if they plan to build up the property anymore. She said they have filled in a lot and with the other apartments built on the other side of the creek, the adjacent property keeps getting lower and lower. . Mr. McMillan with Folsom Investments came forward. He said they have filled in all .that is needed on~their property. ~ Ms. Robinson asked what they plan to put on this property. Chairman Tucker said it was not the place of this Board to find that out, that becomes a platting matter, but the property is zoned Multi Family and Local Retail. Mrs. Allen Chaffin, 5144 Jennings Drive, came forward. She said it was in the Flood Plain and now they have built it 7 feet above the highway. Mrs. Chaffin said the adjacent property will flood. She said they have alrèady bought flood insurance. Mrs. Chaffin said now, when they get only a 2 inch rain, the channel is full. . Mrs. Chaffin said she wanted to make it a matter of record that we are concerned; when they blacktop this property, there will be flooding. Page 18 ( P & Z Minutes September 22, 1983 ( . Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. PZ 83-59 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made tþe motion to approve PZ 83-59. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger. Chairman Tucker said by the Commission taking these actions, they are not granting some use for this property. The motion carried 3-1 with Ms. Nash voting against and Mr. Hannon abstaining. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:25 P. M. CHAIRMAN, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION -- . SECRETARY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION . . . . ",' \. ( \. KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 13, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 93-59, LOCAL RETAIL-F.P. AND MULTI- FAMILY-F.P. TO LOCAL RETAIL AND MULTI-FAMILY, GRID 125 We have received the referenced zoning ëase for our review and find that we could adequatel~ locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. - (~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 .".", /6 . ORD INANCE NO. / D 13 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY~HE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-83-59 the following described property shall be rezoned from Local Retail-Flood Plain & Multi-Family-Flood Plain to Local Retail and Multi-Family. FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION FOR FLOODWAY WALKER BRANCH ADDITION: . Legal description for two drainageways crossing Blocks 1 & 2, Walker Branch Addition to the City of North Richland Hills. The two drainageways are defined as being an 85 foot strip and a 200 foot strip shown on the subdivision plat of record and being more particularly described as follows: ~ An 85 foot drainage easement as shown on Lot 1, Block 1, Walker Braaèh Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and recorded in Volume 388-154, Page 22, of the Tarrant County Plat Records. A 180 foot and 200 foot drainage easement along the boundary line of Lot 2, Block 2, Walkers Branch Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-154, Page 22, of Tarrant County Plat Records. . . City of ~orth ~ich1and 1Iills ,~ -<5:~~ Star of the Metroplex OFFICE OF CITY MANAG~ R t . . October 20, 1983 Memo to: Mayor & City Council From: Rodger N. Line City Manager Subject: Proposed Sign Ordinance Changes Several changes to the sign ordinance are proposed, based on problems experienced in its administration over the past several months. It would have been desirable to discuss the proposed changes in a Pre-Council Session prior to drafting the proposed changes, but time and prior commitments did not permit this procedure. Therefore, I would appreciate your calling Gene or me prior to the Council Meeting Monday night if you have any questions or problems regarding this matter. ß~~ RNL/gp (817) 281-0041 /7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 10/24/83 ~ DATE: . SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Public Works 1) Change in Section 2.10 adds bench signs as temporary signs. At the present time bench signs are not classified in any category. In June of 1984, our franchise runs out with the Bench Ad Sign Company. At this time bench signs should no longer be allowed in the right-of-way and they will probably start placing them on private property so they need to be controlled. 2) Section 3.9 changes the fees for less expensive signs. Under the old wording of this section all sign work required the payment of an examination fee of $50.00 plus a fee based on the value of the work. 3) A proposed change in Section 4.1 is to add the billboard sign as an allowable sign with any development. The owner or the occupant of the premises may . have no more than one of the four listed type of signs, including billboards. 4) Section 6.3 better identifies where subdivisions or development signs can be placed. Under the old wording they cannot be placed in any zoning category except on property zoned like the subdivision it was advertising. I think the intention of this was to keep heavy industrial type subdivision advertising and commercial type subdivision advertising out of single family and multi-family zoned areas. This new wording would still prevent any advertising of commercial or indus~rial type subdivisions in residential subdivisions. The change in this section also prevents subdivisions in other cities from advertising in our City except on the billboard signs along the freeway. (Continued on next page) CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove Ordinance amending the sign Ordinance. . BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES N/A N/A NO N/A . Page 2 5) The change in Section 8.1 allows the Director of Public Works to approve billboard signs instead of these matters having to come before the Council. I think there was some conversation in one of our meetings about the sign ordinance that the Council did not wish to have these matters come before them. 6) Section 8.6 clarifies where a residential zoned boundary is. At the present, the sign ordinance says you cannot have a billboard within 100 feet of a residential zoned boundary. . . .. . . . '. ., ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that ORDINANCE NO. 1001, "Sign Ordinance", adopted January 24, 1983, is hereby amended at Sections 2.10, 3.9, 4.1, 6.3, 8.1' and 8.6, to read as follows: Section 2.10 - Last sentence to read "trailer, portable signs and bench signs are classified as temporary signs" Section 3.9 Add the following, "applicants for signs valued up to $500.00 are not required to pay the examination fee. Applicants for simple copy of letter changes pay according to the monetary value of the proposed work on a sign." Section 4.1 (b) Anyone development may have a choice of but not more than one ground sign, one roof sign, one projecting sign, or one billboard sign. The billboard sign cannot advertise a product or service that is sold on the premise or refer to the premises in any manner. Section 6. 3 Third sentence, "such signs shall be located on private property only. Signs advertising single family subdivisions are the only signs allowed in single family and agriculture zoned areas. Only signs advertising two-family and single family subdivisions shall be allowed in two-family zoned areas. Only signs advertising multi-family, two-family and single family subdivisions shall be allowed in multi-family zoned areas. Signs in single family, two family, multi-family and agriculture zoned areas shall be erected on unimproved lots only. If a lot is to be improved all subdivision signs that may be present shall be removed before the lot is improved. Signs advertising any subdivisions outside the city limits of North Richland Hills are not allowed to be erected except as a billboard sign. Section 8. 1 . (a) No billboard may be constructed unless a sign permit has been issued and approved by the Director of Public Works. Section 8. 6 (a) add, "a residential zone boundary is any single family or two-family zoned area as shown on the official Zoning Map of the City." PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1983. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Ci ty Secretary City Attorney . 'i ' DATE: September 8, 1983 A /7 ~ ..:" ~, .. ,..i . \: ~ \. .~ " ........ .' : - SüBJECT:. C.'. Request of Kem Advertising for· Billboard Sign Along Loop 820 ·at Glenview Drive DEP ARnŒl\"T : Public Wo~ks BACKGROUND : . ~. ". . hi hlighted ·for:~ase of reference. There is no s Pertin~nt sections of the Si£n Ordinance are att.ched for your ~~vipw .,. . .,. a bÙlbo~rd sign· on the ·same property as a ~round sign; however, .the ~'rovision is .. . .. written in such a way that it appears that the intent was to limit'the number of .": .signs to one. ~....." .... þ", . ~~.. - .... .:........ . , City Council considera~ion and guidance is requésted regarding this ,: 'request and for future similar situations. . . ~ ."'1: ...-. -..: . <:: :. .:.: . '. . a··. .' - -..å ':i~. . - .. . , CITY COUNCIL AC!ION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove requested sign BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOffirr }'ruMBER: e- t ~ . . ______ I~i~~--__--_-___-_------~-----_____________________ --------------------- f . - .. . . ·;)t~·'· ·:.b'- -..J~ ., .l .. ce (b) Tenporary Signs: for temporary signs. a 'single filing/permit fee of $10.00 shall be required SECTION 3.10 IDENTIFICATION Every ·sign or other advertising structure erected shall have painted on, or otherwise permanently marked upon it a number assigned by the Building Department, ~ 'which sþåri ~e ?o~ less than one (1) inch in height and shall be plainly visible from the ground or from the roof adjacent to the sign. .a.. ARTICLE 4 AREA OF SIGN PERMITTED SECTION 4.1 SIGNS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL (a) For signing purposes, frontage on private streets that serve as public thoroughfares and not just driveways may, with City Council approval, be consiàered as qualified street frontage. (b) Any' 'one (1) developmerit ..may have a. choice of, but not more than, one ~. --' .;. (1) ground sign or·' .one (1) roof sign_.ar one (1) projecting sign, subject- to the excep- . \',tions contained in·:.section 4.2 through 4.8.. . In ~.~~~!;~_.of. very .large developments ~(e·9·, shopping centers, äpartment co~lexes, etc.) that have substantial frontages r4.n two or more". streets (wi th commercial or industrial zoning on both sides of the ~~~ streets), additional ground signs may be permitted with special approval from the ~ ..... ·City Council. . SECTION 4.2 GROUND SIGNS Ground signs are subject to the following ·provisions: (a) One (1) gr~und or pole sign may be permitted for each 300 linear feet of qualified street frontage with each development in all z~,in9 distr~cts except AG, l-F, 2-F and M:F. (b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be measured as one (1) square foot of area of sign for each linear foot oÍ street frontage, to a maxi~um area of sign of 300 square feet for anyone sign. (c) The rnaxim~~ height. of any grounè sign and its supporting structure shall be twenty-five (25) feet, eXcEpt that ~~e height of a grounò sign may be in- c~ease~ by adding one (1) foot of height for each linear foo~ the sign is set back f=-c~; -:~€ aèjacent proper't:y lines, not. to exceeè a maximum heisnt of Íifty (50) feet to ~~€ '~cp of the sign. (è) The height of any grc~d sign IT~Y ~ot exceeè c~€-~~lf (:) ~he s~o~test l.1:'"lê'=':' èist.ê.J1Ce from the ·loeat.ion of the sign to t.he nearest boür~èë..ry of è.ny AG, 1-:, · . :"', ::::- :-:: zoning district. KEM ADVERTISING. INC.. :!263 Ei;~.~h k-enut. Fort Worth. 'Texas 76"0 . (8t~ ¡:,.5S21 " .. , ~. .. ~ ". i ~. Outdoor Advertising SpeciaHsts f I. August 11, 1983 ~ /' .. Mr. Rodger Line City Managet City Of North Richland Hills P.o. Box 18609 North -xichland Hills, Texas 16118 D e è r l--1 r. L i n e , We would like to request to be on the agenda for the August 22, 1983 meeting of the North Richland Bills City Council. The purpose of our .appearance is ~oseek issuance of a permit £01: a billboa.rd sign located .at the cotnet of. Glenview and N.E. Loop 820 currently occupied by Pearl vision Center. -....'. Thank you for your con sid era t ion. ~6~ ==~: . . . \ f'" ,\ " .' ~ , co~...c ACtAL -. lit tAL £S"A"T[ G. .., . .. ---- - ~- --- - - ._-------.... ......... ..... BRADLEY G:' HARRI,$ON 6.6 -O.......G SP~.NGS '-0..0 a .,., 3~·;' 613 . .al"·"32·~~'O FORT .WORTH, TEXAS 76..4 August 1 0, 1983 . , o , to / .. ,. Mr. Jimmy E. Daniel KEM Advertising, Inc. 2263 Eighth Avenue Fort Worth~ Texas 76110 Re: Billboard Sign. I - 820 & Glenview N. Ric·hland Hills, Texas Dear Jimmy: This will serve.·to confirm·· our cónv~rsation concerning the sub j e c t pro 'p e r t y and yo ur des ire toe r e eta b ; 1 1 - board sign. Please consider this your authority to make application for a building permit and take any other action on my behalf to secur~ such permit. If you. or th€ City of N. Richland Hills, require any further authority or information pleas'e do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, BGH/mbh . . ,. . .. .' . ..<2:~:~'~;:;.:' -.:.:~,.. , . ........ {, . , ~ ¡ ;. r-" .. - .-.-... ~... ..._{;....¿-~: .::..'. .-. ~;::~~~~::," ~~~7i;'. . ,9 ô~ ~ 'Y..ø \' ~,« / r" '-.- 'r .. !!# " ~ =. o N ~ , ~ P¿'4~'- ~( --t GL £#V/£I/'/. 1:),e~IV'~ ................-.-" ø .. .~.__ (' . , . . ._;i~~~;_~~.:;~~á~~;it~.~;~@~~~~f~~f~i{~.~?~jltl~~~J~t1¥~l,~1.~4..~~t:~~~;~tE.~~~1~~i~ :_,.~...\.....r*';;,¡ ··v,·-r-....v·~ft~~};:I$~~'t-:;i?3;o:::f]j~~o#-. . ~,3,;%~~~...'>C.,.~.t~.!'-ŠC~:;¡9t..~ iI.~~þ$..""1~~'" :'·-;'·r' . .:,~.:,;~·:':··~~'~~~~~f~~7~~~if!·f~~~:!~·,~~~~~·1 ?\~~~~ ~~~::~, ··:~:~~ff?~}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l'~~~~~_~i:~~~~~J.:~·~~¢~~~~~'t -::'.,:' '\': DATE: September 8, 1983 ~ J é/...· J ð : c- SUBJECT:, , ... Request of Mobil Oil -Corporation for variance from Sign' Ordinance DEP ARTMEl\'T : Pub.~ic_ Works :~e applicant has requested three pole signs; one is a pricing Slgn and BACKGROUND: the other·~!:~· ar~·:-Mobil signs.' The sign ordinance allows only one pole" sign' on this ~.,. // ..':. property. Thr~ugh inadvertence, the applicant was improperly given a set of plans show- ing all three signs as being approved~ Accordingly, 'the applicant proceeded to erect the poles) and they are in place. The applicant was told pr_~or to erecting ·the signs that permits were required, but he proceeded with e~ecting the poles, withoùt.p~rmits. . . . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Ap~rove/Disapprove the requested var~ance. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUN'l l\1.JM.BER: . _~ß,Æ ~~___________________~___________________________ ----------------------------- ~j/~~ . ce .,. .,~ ~ . ~ Mobil Oil Corporation . \ , , /' P.O. BOX 222225 DALLAS. TEXAS 75222 ENGINEERING CENTER September 2, 1983 City Manager City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Sir: RE: Mobil Service Station 5036 Rufe Snow Drive North Richland Hills, TX Permission is requested to be placed on the agenda of the September 12, 1983 City Council Meeting to request a variance to ordinance no. 1001 of the North Richland Hills Building Code. This request is to allow the installation of Mobil identification and price signage at subject location. If you should have any questions concerning this, please call the undersigned at (214) 658- 9. HDS/bjh . - ~.. /9 DATE: October 24, 1983 ~ .UBJECT~ Ordinance Adopting Updated Service Credit and Supplemental Death benefits of the Tèxas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). DEP ARTMENT : Adminis~rqtion BACKGROUND: A City" s participation in TMRS can be amended by ordinance only. This . . . . ordinance satisfies this requirement for the City to add the Updated Service Credit and Supplemental Death benefits to our current plan. The~e additional benefits would be effective January 1, 1984. The costs associated with these benefits are included in our 1983/84 Operating Budget. . CITY COUNCIL AC~ION REQUIRED: Consideration to Approve BUDGETED ITEM: ' YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: Budgeted in each department under line item 1160. . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND ALLOWING, UNDER THE ACT GOVERNING THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, "UPDATED SERVICE CREDITS" IN SAID SYSTEM FOR SERVICE PERFORMED BY QUALIFYING MEMBERS OF SUCH SYSTEM WHO PRESENTLY ARE IN THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; PROVIDING FOR PARTICIPATION OF THE CITY IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL DEATH BENEFITS FUNDS TO PROVIDE CERTAIN IN-SERVICE DEATH BENEFITS FOR EMPLOYEES, AND DEATH BENEFITS FOR ANNUITANTS WHOSE LAST EMPLOYMENT BEFORE RETIREMENT WAS WITH THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR SUCH ACTIONS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section l. Authorization of Updated Service Credits (a) On the terms and conditions set out in Sections 63.40l through 63.403 of Title llOB, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, as amended, each member of the Texas Municipal Retirement S'ystem who has current service credit or prior service credit in said System in force and effect on the lst day of January, 1984, by reason of service in the employment of the City of North Richland Hills, and on such date has at least 36 months of credited service with said system, shall be and is hereby allowed "Updated Service Credit" (as that term is defined in subsection (d) of Section 63.402 of said title) in an amount that is lOO% of the "base Updated Service Credit" of the member _ (calculated as provided in subsection (c) of Section 63.402 of said title). The Updated Service Credit hereby allowed shall replace any Updated Service Credit, prior service credit, special prior service credit, or antecedent service credit previously authorized for part of the same service. (b) On the terms and conditions set out in Section 63.601 of said title, any member of the Texas Municipal Retirement System who is eligible for Updated Service Credits on the basis of service with this City, and who has unforfeited credit for prior service and/or current service with another participating municipality or municipalities by reason of previous service~ and was a contributing member on January l, 1983, shall be credited with Updated Service Credits pursuant to, calculated in accordance with, and subject to adjustment as set forth in said 63.601. (c) In accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of Section 63.401 of said title, the deposits required to be made to the Texas Municipal 4IÞ Retirement System by employees of the several participating departments on account of current service shall be calculated from and after the date . . Page 2 Ordinance No. 4IÞ aforesaid on the full amount of such person's earnings as an employee of the City. Section 2. Supplemental Death Benefit Fund That the City of North Richland Hills hereby elects to participate in the Supplemental Death Benefits Fund of the Texas Municipal Retirement System for the purpose of providing in-service death benefits for each of the City's employees who are members of said System, and for the purpose of providing post-retirement death benefits for annuitants whose last covered employment was as an employee of the City, in the amounts and on the terms provided for in Sections 62.004, 64.60l through 64.605, 65.3l4, 65.409. and 65.502 of Title 110B, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, as amended. Effective Date. Subject to approval by the Board of Trustees of Texas Municipal Retirement System, the updated service credits and coverage under the Supplemental Death Benefits Fund granted hereby shall be and become effective on the 1st day of January, 1984. . Passed and approved this the ____ day of , 1983. DICK FARAM, MAYOR ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, City Attorney . DATE: 10-24-83 ~o C1' ______... ~ ::: SUBJECT: Asphalt Self Propelled Hydraulic Paver . DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: . On October 17,1983 at 10:00 A.M. Bids for the above mentioned equipment were opened and are outlined below.(9 Bid Specifications were mailed and 4 returned) VENDOR EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT BID P.A. Ross No Bid Clemons Traetor No Bid Cooper Machinery o 29~497.50 Henry Machinery o 23,042.25 This paver will be used to upgrade the street department and enhance their capabilities for overlaying and new pavement work. The 1983-84 adopted Budget 4IÞ provides funds in the amount of $25,000.00, for the purchase of one Asphalt Self Propelled Hydraulic Paver. - .- CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove the purchase of one ASDhalt 4IÞ Self Propelled Hydraulic Paver in'the amount of $23.042.25 from Henrv Machinerv. B'UDGETED ITEM: YES X NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: Ol~60-04-6400 " . . 0 { ~ ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I ~ ", PURCHASING DEPARTMENT -:'1~ NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS Saf the 'MetropJex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM ~ ~ VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: Request For: Asphalt Self Propelled Hydraulic Paver . - . Bid Opening Date: 10:00 A.M. , October 17, 1983 Date: Requisition No. lO:OO Sealed bids will be received until A.M, October 17, 1983 City of North Richland Hilts, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: Citv Secret ~rv Phone: 817-28]-(~O41 ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 Asphalt Self Propelled Hydraulic Paver 1 each ?~ n4? 2¡; I FF ROY 'c;IJPI=R QnnT - TRArK PER ATTACHED SPECIFICATIONS I NOTF· VIBRATORY c;rRFFr1NOT RF()lJF~TFn I "" -e ON RTf) FORM. OPTION AVAILABLE FOR $700.00 NOT INCLUDED IN BID. , Bidder is to attach specification and literature on brand bid SEE ATTACHFf) C:;PFr C;HFFT & NOTE REGARD I NG R FrFNT Ml1.f\f11 ACTU RING IMPROVEMENTS SUB-TOT AL "'- ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ?7i 04? 2Ei../ TE. NET % 1 0 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH AI ND HilLS: DELIVERY IN 21 DAYS FROM REC T OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- ing Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- ties, or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HilLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR All QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSt- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. DA TE: q - ? , - 8 3 Aenry Machinery Company MAiliNG ADDRESS: P. o. BOX 280136 . DALLAS, TEXAS 75228 R. L. "BOB" HENRY (214) 22.6-0400 . In the past twelve months, Lee Boy has improved the model Super 900 machine in the following ways: .t- 1. New type transmission - 4 speed - 2 forward, 2 reverse 2. Double plated wheels 3. Center idler on track machines 4. Screed insert widened in order for extension to lay a smoother mat .5. Increased screed thickness from 3/16" to 1/4" 6. Guide bar 7. Added two more speeds to Super 900 paver 8. Sight gauge and thermometer on hydraulic tank 9. Safety prop for hopper lip 10. Rubber engine mounts on Super 900 paver . "WORLDWIDE HEAVY EQUIPMENT SPECIALISTS" I.H.20 EAST (1 MILE EAST OF BELTLINE ROAD). SUNNYVALE. TEXAS 75149 . . ... It . .....-.. . The following specifications are intended to describe a Self-Propelled Hydraulic Paver equal to or exceeds the Lee-Boy Super Power (The Lee-Boy 900 is used to indicate a type of quality) SECTION I 1. Unit shall have an overall minimum width of 9'10" 2. Paving width shall be a minimum of l' .to 13' 3. Height shall not exceed 6' 4. Length shall not exceed 9' 5. W~ight shall be_a minimum 6f 8500 lbs 6. Hopper capacity shall be 4~ to 5 tons minimum 7. Screed shall be heavy duty propane heated 8. Paving depth shall be from 0 to 6" minimum 9. Paving speed shall be from 0 to 40 FPM 10. Travel speed shall be from 0 to 120 FPM ll. Power plant shall be a Wisconsin (or equal) 30 HP V-4 engine (gasoline) * 12. Traction shall be track type 13. Hydraulics must be dual pump system 14. Unit must be quipped with dual control (Left and right hand) 15. Unit shall be equipped with electric spray down with a minimum of 5 gal capacity tank SECTION II I. Parts Warranty 1 YFAR A~ATNc;T nFFFrTS TN WORKM4NSHIP 2. Labor Warranty 9 0 DAYS 3. Delivery Schedule 3 WEEKS FROM RECE I PT OF ORDER 4. Replacement parts available at HENRY MACH TN FRY CO 5. Repair facility located at HENRY MACHINERY CO. . . . y /' DATE: 10-20-83 ~ SUBJECT: Johnson Tank Repair and Repainting Contractor's Estimate #3 and Final Utility DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: However, the contractor did not complete the job on time and he had a 30 day overrun on this job. The amount in the contract for liquidated damages show This tank repair is complete at this time and is back in service. to be $100 per day which amounts to $3,000. The tank was not completed at that time ~ccording to the plans and specifications. Myself and the city engineer inspected the tank and decided that 60% of the responsibility of not completing the tank in a proper manner was the contractor's and the city accepted 40% of the responsibility. Based on the 60/40% split of the responsibility I would recommend that we also split the liquidated damages based on that same percentages which means that the liquidated damages would be $1,800. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/disapprove payment in the amount of $6,071.25 to Rand S Quality Painting Contractors, Inc. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES X NO Utility Bond Fund ~ . KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas October 18, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-419, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS JOHNSON TANK REPAIR AND REPAINTING CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE NO.3, FINAL Enc,losed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.3, and Final dated June 23, 1983, made payable to Rand S Quality Painting Contr., Inc., in the amount of $7,871.25, for materials furnished and work pe~formed on the referenced project as of August 22, 1983. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Allen Bronstad, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item ,extensions and additions. ... The two (2) year period of mainenance will begin on this date and therefore will' terminate on October 18, 198'5'. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $7,871.25, be made to Rand S Quality Painting Contr., Ince, P.O. Box 886, Gladewater, Texas 75647. We will· be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. 7?7/,~.s- (ð'DO.ÐO ~:~i~:ures ~ ý:/'~ßr~M 6 0 1 / ,;X S cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ~Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. R.L. Denmon, Contractor . 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283"6211. METRO/267-3367 ..." , .. DATE: 10-20-83 ......... ........ . SUBJECT: Partial Pay Estimate #8 - Holiday North Street and Drainage Improvements DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: This job is for all practical purposes completed. This is not the final payment however. . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: 4IÞ to Stolaruk Corporation. Approve/disapprove payment in the amount of $37,980.90 BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: General Obli , / .. K NOWL TO N-E NG LI 5 H-F LOW E RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas . October 18, 1983 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-328, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HOLIDAY NORTH STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.8 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.8, dated October 5, 1983, made payable to Stolaruk Corporation, in the amount of $37,980.90 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of September 30, 1983. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. . We recommend that this payment, in amount of $37,980.90, be made to Stolaruk Corporation at P.o. Box ·6'1587, Dallas, Texas 75261. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the October 24 Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager ·?Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works . Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Ms. Lou Spiegel, Director of Finance Mr. Ronald T. Jones, Stolaruk Corporation . 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267.3~67 ({ /? ;_ I r, , I2t~ /C¡Li-~ /9J3 '/ì 1.A. , t!tJdjL....A~ · ttd /))~~r '. t~'J tf 'IL~aL 'ß~ 'deaJ ~-J '/hA...-:ß- ~ : ~ ~ ..£Lv ---l1..~,e..v~..; pi U'iKI}~('4V4../Þ ~/. ~~~~ ~ ~.J~U-~¡P~ ~u.-l:¡~ '-./')}~ ~~' tL1..A.¿,J J:./u..; ,.../'X-L U"J-. -,(/)~X'¿C-L'(~~ ¡L- tv d~~~ /'Ù,dv ~~ ~,~»<../ ~ ~ ~ '~l ~¡J~~ ---¿jtLuv. tld4Z- ~-' JJ -£.u~Aj ~ fl~J:/~ ~h0 ::z: aLL~ .', CM-J {I7¿ ~·ú0~3~j~~~' "-'. ........ ...."". .. _ , i. ..~... _' ......... -,.. .. ~ · I '. --...... "'-.-. ......~-..~..'. ~-Ldh/ f··· .__._~~~,..~.,... -....--. . I 'ß~ X r~~ »*/U!~ ~ 'C¿~~.?1(;-J 5~/.;J..; ~~~ cJfEÙ[ ß~ x.k?~ ·