The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1982-09-13 Agendas • DATE: 9-9-82 SUBJECT: Request for water service DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: This property is located at 7724 Precinct Line Rd. south of L. D. Lockett Road and north of the County garage in Tarrant County. outside of the City limits. I must recommend that this request be denied. This is a 2" main that is over a mile long and we have had complaints from our customers about lack of water. To add to the problem there is a mobile home park on this line. • • • CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: . d' CITY OF NORTH RI"CHlAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Fu'" the Meeting'" .~cpte.~b eJ:' 1 ~.) 1 Q 8' ~, at 6 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 H.E. loop 820. NUMB ER' - 3. ---"""f' ~. ; ITEM . .. ·...ACTION TAKEN 5: "....- 1.~ Executive Session to discuss 2. Discussion p.f duties of the Civi Service Commiss·o . llo. J Discussion cöf.Otdinaric~ amending the Nuisance 'Ordinance CO IL 6:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order '. 2. Roll Call 3. Invocatiön 4. Consideration of Minutes of the Meeting August 23, 1982 Presentation of Five Year Certificate . and Service Pin to Tommy Ut ity Department the "P age 2 CITY OF NORTH .RI'CHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Fu.· the Meeting'" September 13, 1982 . , at ~ p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 H.E. Loop 820. 6:30 P.M. NU~ ER .. ; ITEM . ....." ; ACTION,TAKEN , ., PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 82-20 Re uest of Elmer Allison to Rezone Tract 3A Abstract ll50,'David Moses Surve (: ¡" . .- IF-12-1800 IF-9-1700 and IF-9-1500" Located east of Eden Road and north of Amundson Road) . h. J sideration of Ordinarice for:PZ 82-20 PLANNING & ZONING PS 82-25, Request of'." Lena Silay for Final" Plat of· Lot 1, Block 14, Glenann Addition Request of Mid-America of Texas, Inc..; for Water Service at 7724 Precinct Line Road L Consideration of Or.dinance Amending Ordinan~e No. ~61, Nuisance Ordinance Consideration of Awarding ~ids on Computer System L..~.~ / Consideration of Ratif in Staff Action and Payment· to Leonard Hazel Incorporated in the Amount of $12,652.10 - Replacement of North Hills Water Line It . Page 3 . CITY OF NORTHRItHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA .' Fl)}- the MeetiM'"' ~ h 13 1982 ..~ pptpm PT . , at yy~ p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 H.E. Loop 820. b:~O P.M. NUttBER .. ; ITEM . .. .... ACTION· TAKEN 14. Consideration of Payment to' Austin Road Company in the Amount of $42,404.84 ~ / Rufe Snow Drive Phase I . 15. Consideration of Name Change_pn Permit" for. the Sa¡e of Beer for,Dff~Premise ------r. Cons~mption·- Gulf Station, 5100 Rufe Snow Drive .. ,_.. Presentation 6f Master Plan for City Parks Consideration of Application by Texas Electric Service' Com any for Consolidation of .Com anies 18. Consideration of Ordinance Approving ,the Sale of $4,500,OOO·in General Obligåtion . Bonds . j Citizen Presentation Ms. Jane Bingham' The Women's Center Re: Financial Support ~ r. l ;. ¡ . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, AUGUST 23, 1982 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order August 23, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim Ramsey Jim Kenna Richard Davis Dick Fisher J. C. Hubbard Marie Hinkle Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmen Councilwoman STAFF: Rodger Line Jeanette Moore Rex McEntire Richard Albin Gene Riddle Margie Nash CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL City Manager City Secretary City Attorney City Engineer Director Public Works/Utilities Planning and Zoning Board Member PRESS: Jeff Yates Mid Cities Daily News ABSENT: Harold Newman Councilman 3. The invocation was given by Councilman Dick Fisher. 4. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of August 9, 1982. Motion carried 6-0. 5. Mayor Faram advised the Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval subject to the Engineer's comments and all comments had been met. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PS 81-53. Motion carried 6-0. INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 9, 1982 APPROVED PLANNING AND ZONING PS 8l-53,REQUEST OF CAMBRIDGE COMPANY DEVELOPMENT CORPO- RATION FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 3, 4, AND 5, BLOCK 1, NORTHPARK PLAZA, PHASE I I APPROVED 6. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come - forward. Mr. Delbert stembridge, consulting Engineer, appeared before the Council representing Cross Road Development. Mr. stembridge stated that a 400 foot strip adjacent to this property was already zoned Local Retail. Mr. stembridge stated a garden-type office complex was planned for the site and an additional 100 feet of property was needed. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward.. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. 7. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve PZ 82-18, Ordinance No. 972. Motion carried 6-0. 8. Mr. Line stated the proposed 1982-83 budget included a tax rate reduction amounting to one percent, a proposal that the tax rate be reduced from $0.69 per $100.00 valuation to $0.68. Mr. Line stated that also included in the proposed budget was some badly needed service improvements, including adding two patrolmen, and contingent on the outcome of the county-wide ambulance system, adding an additional dispatcher and up- grading our local ambulance system, including the addition of paramedics. Mr. Line stated a major detailed management analysis of the Public Works Department was proposed to determine what was needed to improve the productivity of the service provided by the department. Mr. Line stated a new Reference Librarian was also proposed to meet the growing demands of library services. Mr. Line stated there was money available to meet the salary requirements as recommended by Civil Service in terms of a cost-of- living increase for City employees. Mr. Line stated funds were also available to finance the 1982-83 cost of the four and one-half million dollar sale of bonds that were previously approved by the voters. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. Mr. John Gibbs, 5728 Bermuda Drive, appeared before the Council. August 23, 1982 Page Two PLANNING AND ZONING PUBLIC HEARING PZ 82-18, REQUEST OF CROSS ROADS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 2, ABSTRACT 1606, W. W. WALLACE SURVEY FROM MULTI- PLE FAMILY TO LOCAL RETAIL (LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE, BETWEEN BUENOS AND PROPOSED MEADOW CREST DRIVE) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 82-18 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 0-~ PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET FOR 1982-83 FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I. I I \ \ I. . Mr. Gibbs asked what the one percent reduction in tax was based on, 1981 or 1982. Mr. Line stated it was based on the best available information that the City received several weeks ago when the þudget had to be prepared. Mr. Line stated the information at that time indicated a total tax roll of 520 million dollars. Mr. Line stated the City had been advised that there was a tentative tax roll of 576 million dollars, but the City would not know what the actual final tax roll would be until about the middle of September. Mr. Line stated that at that time it would be at the option of the Council to reduce the tax rate even further if the total tax roll did come in as the City had been advised. Mr. Gibbs stated that on the notices received from Tarrant Appraisal District a $0.65 tax rate was suggested. Mr. Line stated that if the figure of 576 million came in the tax rate could be set at $0.65. Mr. Gibbs stated he was concerned about the taxes and would appreciate anything the City could do. Mayor Faram stated the Staff was directed to prepare a budget within three percent of the previous budget on the taxable inventories last year. Mayor Faram stated that until the inventory came in the City would be unable to set the tax rate. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 9. City Manager Rodger Line presented the following proposed Revenue Sharing Budget: Public Works equipment, $115,000; display writer/word pro- cessor, $15,000; ambulance, $36,000, contingent on the County-wide system; Civil Defense sirens (Phase I), $46,000; radio communications (Phase II), $25,000. Mayor Faram opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Faram asked when the Revenue Sharing Budget would be adopted. August 23, 1982 Page Three PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REVENUE SHARING BUDGET FOR 1982-83 FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Mr. McEntire stated the budget could be adopted at the next Council meeting. councilwoman Hinkle asked if the City was going to wait on the purchase of the ambulance until the County came up with something on the county-wide system. Mr. Line stated the staff would not move forward on the ambulance until the Council gave the go-ahead or the county abandoned the project. Councilman Davis asked if the ambulance was included in the qperating Budget. Mr. Line stated it was referred to in the operating Budget but was not included. Mayor Faram asked if all of the funds in Revenue Sharing had to be ear- marked at the final passage. Mr. McEntire stated the funds could be used in the same category. '10. Mr. Line stated this was a relatively new program that the City intended to follow through with each year hereafter, whereby the Council would be asked to program the use of capital Improve- ment funds by allocating specific approval to one year capital projects by specific street, drainage and waterline designation for the ensuing years to tentatively schedule the construction of other projects for the following four years in the capital Improvements Program. Mr. Line stated that as this was done it would enable the Administrative staff and Engineer to know exactly what capital projects that were to be constructed in the twelve month period so that projects could be done on a timely basis and give an idea on what projects could be done in pursuing years. Mr. Line stated this proposed budget did program the use of $8,701,600 in type supported items which were for the most part street improvements and storm drains, $2,502,200 for water and sewer type improvements for a grand total of $8,701,600 over the next five year period. Mr. Line stated that in addition to this first phase of the preparation of the program there was something over three million dollars in capital needs that funds were not available for. Mr. Line stated that if the Council so desired, another election could be called for consideration by the voters on what the most pressing needs were. August 23, 1982 Page Four PUBLIC HEARIN( PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PRO- GRAM BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS · r. I \ 11. 12. I ¡ '. Mayor Faram stated a Council Committee had been appointed to monitor this project and asked the Chairman, Mayor Pro Tern· Ramsey, if he would like to speak. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated it was the concern of the Council that the program begin as fast as possible. Councilman Davis, Committee Member, stated he would like to commend the Staff and Engineer for the work they had done on the program. Councilman Davis stated the City definitely was ready to see improvements on the streets and drainage. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. Mr. Dwight Banks, 8320 Jerri Jo, appeared before the Council. Mr. Banks stated there was a storm drainage problem on Jerri Jo and would like to know what priority Jerri Jo would have. Mayor Faram stated that area was in the number one priority classification. Mayor Faram stated there had been some problems on getting needed easements. Mr. Line stated that copies of the proposed Capital Improve- ments Budget was available in the Library and the City Secretary's office. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. Mr. Line advised the Council that after the recommendation had been received it was determined that neither of the companies met specifications. Mr. Line stated the Staff recommended that all bids be rejected and the Council authorize the rebidding of the system. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to reject all bids and the Staff be authorized to have the system rebid. Motion carried 6-0. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the low bid of Mid Cities Chrysler/plymouth in the amount of $9,432.45. Motion carried 6-0. August 23, 1982 Page Five CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR RADIO COMMUNICATIONS CONSOLE SYSTEM REJECTED CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR VEHICLE FOR POLICE CHIEF APPROVED 13. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by councilman Ramsey, to approve payment to stolaruk corporation in the amount of $29,696,03, Davis Boulevard Water System Extensions. Funds to be appropriated from utility Bond Funds. Motion carried 6-0. 14. Mr. Albin stated he was asked to receive proposals for cathodic protection on the Conn Drive ground storage tank. Mr. Albin stated four proposals were received. Mr. Albin stated he had requested that the bids be broken down by engineering cost to recommend a cathodic system for the tank and also the cost of the equipment that would be required. Mr. Albin stated the overall low bid was from Corrintec/USA¡ however, the low engineering cost was from Harco Corporation. Mr. Albin stated that he wanted to point out that until an engineering study was done, which included soil resistivity and other testing, there was no way of knowing what type of cathodic protection the system was going to need. Mr. Albin stated an accurate figure on the total cost on the system was not known at this time. Mr. Albin stated because the initial engineering fee proposed by Harco was lower than Corrintec, it was his recom- mendation that Harco be awarded the contract for preparing the plans and specifications for cathodic protection. Mayor Faram asked if the cost would be $17,200.00. Mr. Albin replied yes. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to award the contract to Harco in the amount of $17,200.00. Councilman Kenna asked if the Council was awarding a con- tract for $17,200.00 or only for the engineering at this point and time. Mr. Albin stated that would be up to the Council, however. they wanted to handle it. Mr. Albin stated that normally the way this worked was that cathodic equipment was a very specialized area and each corrosion consultant recommends their company's own equipment and was very difficult to establish a uniform standard as far as specifications. Mr. Albin stated the Council might wish to go ahead and award the entire contract to Harco for engineering and supplying their own equipment. Motion to approve carried 6-0. August 23, 1982 Page Six CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PAYMENT TO STOLARUK CORPORA- TION IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,696.03 - DAVIS BOULEVARD WATER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR CATHODIC PROTECTION FOR CONN STREET WATER TANK APPROVED 15. . 16. r. ATTEST: August 23, 1982 Page Seven Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to award the janitorial contract to General in the amount of $11,205.84. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CITY HALL JANITORIAL CONTRACT APPROVED Mayor Faram stated the staff had reconunended Jani King. Councilman Hubbard stated his reason for General was because Jani King had an initial cost of $450.00 on one of the specification items and that would bring their total charge to $11,586.00. Councilman Hubbard stated the other companies were not required to break the charge down and they would also meet the specifications at a savings of some several hundred dollars. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. McEntire stated that Mr. Gregory had been called out of town and this matter could be handled later. CITIZEN PRESENTATION MR. LYN GREGORY RE: WATER SERVICE TO 7700 BLOCK OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD NO ACTION Mr. Woodard Jones appeared before the Council. Mr. Jones stated he had been a resident of North Richland Hills for eighteen years. Mr. Jones stated that on May 14, 1982, his house was flooded with sewer water. Mr. Jones stated the Water Department personnel and the Fire Depart- ment came and vacuumed up the water. Mr. Jones stated he turned in a claim and the City's insurance company denied it. Mr. Jones stated the backup was caused. by something in the main sewer line. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Jones if he had insurance. Mr. Jones stated he did not have a homeowner's policy, but felt the City was responsible. Mr. McEntire stated the City was not libel for sewer backup. Mr. Jones asked why the City carried insurance. Mr. McEntire stated the City was under what was called governmental functions and was not libel for sewer backup. 17. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of August 23, 1982. ADJOURNMENT. Dick Faram - Mayor Jeanette Moore - City Secretary .. . CITY OF NORTH _RfCHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA , . Fu}- the Meeting'" September 21, 1982 tat 7:30 p.m.. in the City Hall. 7301 H.E. Loop 820. ITEM ." ., . ' . ACTION· TAKEN NUftBER· .. 0" ~ . ., ' . .. - . ....." ; . PRE-COUNCIL : f 7:00 P.M. ", 1. Discussion of City Council Rules of Proc~dure " - 2. Discussion of Amending Ordinance Nf).~ 195 (Agenda Item 1F!6) , .. 3. Dis·cussion of Other Items . - '--- l .. . -. . -. COUNCIL ~.. 7:30 P.M. . - Òrder - 1. Call to - . ; ,4 2. Roll Call - J. ~ ~ h- C' .~......... , - 3. Invocation 4. Consideration of Minutes of the Regular " . Meeting Sep temb'er 13, 1982 5. Consideration of Request of Mid-America of Texas, for Water Service at 7724 Precinct Line Road . . , 6. l.'lanning & Zoning - Public Hearing PZ 82-21, Request: of Burk Collins to Rezone Maroaks Addition from IF-9-1600 - One Family Dwelling to 2F-9-Two' Family" Dwelling (Located at the south end of Douglas Lane) .ge 2 .' CITY OF NORTH .R1CHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . - Fu}- the Meeting'" September 27. 1982 tat 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 H.E. Loop 820. NUri3 ER " ; ITEM . . _'.~;. ACTION· TAKEN '- - , .. 7. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-21.· 8. " . Planning & Zoning - Public Hearing PZ 82-22, Request of Herman Smith,' ./ Stonybrooke, Incorporated, to Rezone· a· Portion of Tract A, Block 13, Stoneybrook Addition from Commercial to 1F~9-1300 - One Family Dwellings (Located east of, Davis Boulevard,_south'of Hight9wer an~ bounded on the south by ~~oo~haven Drive) ~- l. ; . . . - .. I 9. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-22 ~. . 10. - . . . . - Planning & Zoning - Public Hea~ing PZ 82-23, Request of T. W. .Alley, Sr. to Rezone a Portion of Lot 2, Block 4, - ·University Plaza Addition from Local Retai] to Comm~rcial-S~ecific Use-Multi-Story Office Building and Restaurant (Located east of Weyland Drive, S~uth of - "" ~ -, .,.-.......... . - University Plaza 'Apartments and ..North of Bank of North Texas and Airport Freeway) 11. €ons~deration of Ordinance for PZ 82-23 - . 12. Consideration of Ordinance Changing Santa Domin2a Court to W~S ;.I".a~ nri Vp ni ~r11(:(:; nn and Ar r; on t:on rp,.-n; n 0' ~n11n~; 1 Policv "R~\[a ùinQ Rnfp ~nn~ n,.;,,~ 'A-~-'-'-'-- f(: .. . .. CITY OF NORTH RI"CHLAND HILLS .. Page 3 - ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . Fu}- the Meeting' '. September 27'} 1982 t at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Ha 11 , 7301 H.E. loop 820. - ~ ITEM .. " * - ACTION· TAKEN NU~ER' a- .. , . ., ...... ~. 14. Consideration of Awarding Bid for One ( ~) , Pickup Truck (Utility Department) , , 15. Consideration of Awarding Bid for Uni~orms and Leather Goods f'or Police Department .'" 16. Consideration of Ordinance Amending . , Ordinance No. 195 (Subdivision Ordinance) -, . ':1 l 17. Citizen PresentatiQn ' -- Mrs. Doyne Byrd ' ~4· 8020 Little Dqde Court . ' Deve*lopmen t - Re: on Grapevine ijighway and - Flooding Problems . ; ,- - .. ..... ' ...-...:- 'Mr. Peter Eggert - . . 7804 Daniel Drive, NRH Re: Muni~ipal Court 18. Adjournment . . . . '.. , . - . . I"· t '. \ . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, SEPTEMBER 13, 1982 - 6:30 P.M. 1. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey called the meeting to order September 13, 1982 at 6:30 p.m. 2. Present: Jim Ramsey Richard Davis J. C. Hubbard Dick Fisher Harold Newman Marie Hinkle Mayor Pro Tem Councilmen Councilwoman STAFF: Rodger Line Jeanette Moore Rex McEntire Richard Albin Dennis Horvath Gene Riddle /' CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL City Manager City Secretary City Attorney City Engineer Assistant City Manager Director Public Works/Utilities PRESS: Jeff Yates Mid Cities Daily News ABSENT: Dick Faram Jim Kenna Mayor Councilman Mayor Faram was absent due to attending a Tarrant County Mayor's Council meeting. Councilman Kenna was absent due to being on vacation. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey recognized former Councilwoman Shary1 Groves. 3. The invocation was given by Mayor Pro Tern Jim Ramsey. 4. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting August 23, 1982. Motion carried 5-0. 5. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey advised the Council this item would be delayed because Mr. Leamond was not present at this time. INVOCATION CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 23, 1982 APPROVED PRESENTATION OF FIVE YEAR CERTI- FICATE AND SERVICE PIN TO TOMMY LEAMOND OF THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT [ r '"H. l_ 6. councilman Newman moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard to approve the following appointments: Harold Schubert - Term to expire 5-1-83 Hans W. Kossler - Term to expire 5-1-84 - Alternate Bill Finimore - Term to expire 5-1-83 - Alternate Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked Councilman Newman if he would amend his motion and include the reappointment of the members with terms expiring. councilman Newman amended his motion, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to include the reappointment of the following: Martin Erck - Term to expire 5-1-84 E. K. Hahn - Term to expire 5-1-84 Jack Roseberry - Term to expire 5-1-84 Jesse Range - Term to expire 5-1-83 Amended motion carried 5-0. 7. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey advised that this item and Item Number 8 would be postponed at the request of the applicant. 8. _postponed 9. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by councilman Hubbard, to approve PS 82-25, subject to the Engineer's comments. Motion carried 5-0. september 13, 1982 Page 2 CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPROVED PLANNING AND ZONING PUBLIC HEARIN( PZ 82-20, REQU~~T OF ELMER ALLISON TO REZONE TRACT 3A, ABSTRACT 1150, DAVID MOSES SURVEY FROM AGRICULTURE TO IF-12-l800, IF-9-l700 AND 1F-9-l500 (LOCATED EAST OF EDEN ROAD AND NORTH OF AMUNDSON ROAD) POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 82-80 POSTPONED PLANNING AND ZONING PS 82-25, REQUEST OF LENA SILAY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 14, GLENANN ADDIT:" APPROVED r. l 10. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to move this item to the end of the agenda since the applicant was not present. Motion carried 5-0. 11. Mr. Line stated the only change in the ordinance was to simplify efforts to control weeds and grass. At the present time the notification was required each time the grass or weeds were over 12 inches high. The amendment would require notification only once each year. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 973. Motion carried 5-0. 12. Mr. Horvath stated that at the present time the computer was operating at maximum capacity. Mr. Horvath stated the staff had anticipated this would happen so bids were taken to double the size of the storage system. Mr. Horvath stated only one bid was received,. that being IBM in the amount of $30,910. Mr. Horvath stated the staff ~ecommended the Council award the bid tc IBM. ~ Councilman Fisher asked if the City was locked-in with IBM on the storage system. Mr. Horvath stated there were other companies that sold IBM equipment, but he did not know if they could bid on the internal storage system. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to accept the bid of IBM in the amount of $30,910. Motion carried 5-0. 13. Mr. Line stated the City staff recently discovered that a water line had'been uncovered by heavy rains. Mr. Line stated the line did not have adequate support and was in great danger of breaking and would put a large portion of the City out of water. Mr. Line stated the Staff proceeded under the emergency authorization of the Ch~rter, to contract with Leonard Hazel, Incorporated, to get the line replaced rather than running the risk of having the line break while in the process of writing specifications and taking bids. Mr. Line stated the Staff was asking the Council for ratifica- tion of the emergency action taken and approval of the payment. ,e I September 13, 1982 Page 3 REQUEST OF MID AMERICA OF TEXAS, INC., FOR WATER SERVICE AT 7724 PRECINCT LINE ROAD CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 641 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 973 CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS ON COMPUTER SYSTEM APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RATIFYING STAFF ACTION AND PAYMENT TO LEONARD HAZEL, INCORPORATED IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,652.10, RE- PLACEMENT OF NORTH HILLS WATER LINE APPROVED l l. Councilman Davis asked if there was any particular reason why the City could not have repaired the line. Mr. Line stated the City did not have the capability or the manpower. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by councilman Davis, to ratify staff action and approve payment to Leonard Hazel in the amount of $12,652.10. Motion carried 5-0. 14. councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve payment to Austin Road Company in the amount of $42,404.84, Rufe Snow Drive, Phase I. councilman Fisher asked if this was the final payment. Mr. Line stated there was some cleanup work to. be done and some retainage that had been held that would have to be paid. Motion carried 5~0. 15. Mayor P!O Tem Ramsey stated that at the Council meeting of July 26, 1982, a permit was approved for the sale of beer for off-premise consumption at the Gulf station located at 5100 Rufe Snow Drive in the name of Mike Sharp, as requested. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated the legal name should have been Duane Sharp. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the name change on the permit to Duane Sharp. Motion carried 5-0. 16. Mr. Horvath stated the Council had received a five year Master Plan for the parks. Mr. Horvath stated this plan represented -a year's work by the Park Board and council representative to the Board in preparing the plan. Mr." Horvath stated the staff wanted to present the plan to the Council tonight and hopefully have it on an agenda in October for council approval. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated that in reviewing the plan, Mr. Horvath, ex Mayor Pro Tem Dave Freeman, Councilman Hubbard, and the Park Board did a great job in preparing the plan. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated the city's Engineering firm also helped with the plan and felt everyone was to be congratulated. september 13, 1982 Page 4 CONSIDERATION OF' PAYMENT TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,404.84 - RUFE SNOW DRIVE, PHASE I APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF NAME CHANGE ON PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CON- SUMPTION, 5100 RUFE SNOW DRIVE APPROVED PRESENTATION OF MASTER PLAN FOR CITY PARKS re l . 17. r. l le City Attorney McEntire presented the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The City Attorney be and is hereby authorized to file such objections and protests as he deems advisable and proper to the application of Texas Electric Service Company for con- solidation which was filed with this City on or about September 8, 1982. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve Resolution Number 82~25. Motion carried 5-0. 18. Mr. Harold McInroe, Vice President, First Southwest Company, appeared before the Council. Mr. McInroe stated he was very pleased to advise the Council that three bids were received for the bondp. Mr. McInroe stated that Underwood Neuhaus was low bidder at 9.896807% and he recommended the Council accept the bid and sell the bonds. - City Attorney McEntire presented the following resolution: 1. The low bid of Underwood Neuhaus (9.896807%) for the $4,500,000.00 in General Obligation Bonds be and is hereby approved and accepted. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to approve Resolution No. 82-26. _Motion carried 5-0. Mr. Line stated he would like to point out to the Council that the Capital Improvement Program they had been considering and the finan- cial projections contained in it were based on what seemed to be a realistic estimate at that time on the terms of the interest cost of 12.5 percent. Mr. Line stated the bond market had improved sub- stantially since this particular issue was planned. Mr. Line asked Mr. McInroe if he could make a rough estimate of how much interest savings there would be between 12.5 percent and 9.896807 percent of the life of the bonds. Mr. McInroe stated about $838,325.00 had been saved in interest. september 13, 1982 Page 5 CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BY TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COMPANIES RESOLUTION NUMBER 82-25 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE APPROV- ING THE SALE OF $4,500,000 IN GENERAL OBLIGATION RESOLUTION NO. 82-26 ORDINANCE NO. 974 Mr. McInroe presented the following preamble of the ordinance approving the sale of bonds: AN ORDINANCE by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, authorizing the issuance of $4,500,000 "City of North Richland Hills, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1982," dated October 1, 1982; prescribing the form of the bonds and the' form of the interest coupons; levying a continuing direct annual ad valorem tax on all taxable property within the limits of said City to pay the interest on said bonds and to create a sinking fund for the redemption thereof and providing for the assessment and collection of taxes; enacting pro- visions incident and related ·to the subject and purpose of this ordinance; and providing an effective date. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 974. councilman Davis stated he would like to congratulate the staff and past Council for enabling the City to build a firm financial base that the City was able to get competitive bids of this nature where it ~aved the citizens over $800,000. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated he would like to thank Mr. McInroe himself-and on behalf of the Mayor for his professional way that he handled the bond rating in New York and all of the work he had done. Mr. McInroe stated he would like to thank the staff for their help in putting this issue together. Mr. McInroe stated the City of North Richland Hills was well represented in New York. Motion to approve Ordinance No. 974 carried 5-0. 19. Mrs. Jane Bigham, Program Coordinator, the Women's Center, appeared before the Council. Ms. Bingham explained the operations of the Center to the Council. Ms. Bingham stated the Center did counseling for the cities in the area. Ms. Bingham stated the Center had two full time employees and about 138 volunteers. Ms. Bingham stated the Center was in need of another staff member and would ask that the city of North Richland Hills help pay for that person. Ms. Bingham stated the Center was requesting that North Richland Hills donate $1,000.00 to the Women's Center. september 13, 1982 Page 6 CITIZEN PRESENTA- TION - MS. JANE BINGHAM, THE WOMEN'S CENTER RE: FINANCIAL SUPPORT APPROVED . {. 20. . Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated he was on the Board of Trustees of the Humanity at Bell Helicopter Company and had the experience of personally visiting the Center. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated the Center had a super operation and the enthusiasm that the volunteers had was something to really behold. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated he felt the Center was certainly a worthwhile and needed organization in the North Richland Hills community. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to approve a donation of $1,000.00 to the Women's Center, to be appropriated from the Reserve for Contingency Fund. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey advised that the applicant on Item 10 was not present. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to defer action on this item until the next regular scheduled Council meeting. Item Number 5 was also postponed. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey adjourned the meeting of September 13, 1982 September 13, 1982 Page 7 ADJOURNMENT Jim Ramsey, Mayor Pro Tern ATTEST: .Jeanette Moore, City Secretary . #5:- See Agenda Item Number 12. . .." c\ V ", /" J_I f ) / (¡V ~r¡/i ~...' ,.~·l ,Ai\.; I · W~ " , -vP) . . ,..L~" i/¿ ) ¡, " j,~,4'V \I'" / ~rv\tu'} {'fI."1 ~ j r t/ . --- \ p~ \.,.' :) (tøv ,{\~ /- / 'ðt:: 4 . See Agenda Item Number 11. . . J-" "-_? . :J.F:\·::·:·::.·· :....:.:.:.::~..:.:..:.. ·e- f~ th 1li bland Hill~~~~-~~~~~\;{!:;:·:\·::·:·":··::"·/Hi~~l{%~~X :?::~~':::'.' '. Ity 0 or C ' S . '. ..:....:.:~..:.~::::.::::.::.{:.:.:.: ',':' : :. . . , ..... '. ' '. : . '. . : .' . , . .'. . . . . . ' . . . . , . . . .. . .. . . , . . . . . e Star of the ~etroplex C!Iertifirate of ~erbire THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO: TOMMY LEAMO N IN RECOGNITION OF ' ,'PITIE YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE TO THE CITY IN THE {12'ILTTY DEP.ARTMENT. DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS 7.~-!:h DAY OF SEP:rEMBER~ 1982 Mayor If ~na~ .~' ~^º-J ¡¿ JJÝp Department Head . . .. . :. -. . . "DATE: September 13, 1982'· , ¿; -'1 '" SUBJECT: . Appointments to Board of Adjustment BACKGROUND: Pu b 1 i c \~o rk s Attached are ~rof;le sheets' on Mr. Harold F. Schub~rt and Mr. Hans W. DEPARTMENT: Kossl er which have been submi tted" for appoi nbnent to the Zoning Board o~Adjustment. " Counc i lman Newnan and mysel f met and: the' fol.l OWl n9 a,PPoi ntments are recommended: Martin Erck E. K. Hahn '. Term to Expire· 5-1-84 Term to Expire 5-1-84 · Term -to ~xpire 5-1-84 Term to Expire 5~1-83 "Jack Roséberry "Jesse Range Ha ro 1 d Schuber-t 0" Term to Expire 5-1-83 Term to Expire 5-1-84 . .0 . Alternate- Hans W. Kossler- ßI tL · F £: 1-.) ¡}I!ro ~E S-¡-t:5 .... ...!.,., " "We will need to fill another Alternate ~acancy at a later date. CITY COUNCIL ~CTION lŒQUlRED: Approve/Disapprove BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ::::~~_::::::~-----------~- ----------------------------- . PROFILE FOR PROSPECTIVE CO~MISSION MEMBERS Ndme HAROL-lJ F: ~. CII U8EA-7 41£, /3 b~vL.L[; T)RJVE BEi-I- Jft:=-L Ie. oPIER lex TR-ol'J , Home ~B/-6~O;Z Office :;'80 -c:2J3:::Z DoRI S (IfAL) . . Address Employer ,. Phone: Wife's Name Children's Name and Ages ~eR..R.¡ ,C;C-/·!-vRE!?-T IAI/fALEY r<9 / 1/6!- SC¡'¡L!R~R.T JR ~O Reside·nt of the City since /9SS - /90/. J9c'h·/b PR.ESc/1/1 / Previous Residence f¡6l - /9(.,,5) SA-1/ lJJEG-CJ, CAt. Occupation INDuS/RIAl- E,A/&/A/é¿:R Memberships, Organizations and Previous Experience on City Commission: . i11D -C/7/e S /;1...);.5 kQbFF -I:! .2'1'?3 AH£f¿ICAlI IIJST/7ure Ç;F II\iÖ.VS7~/^L ENG-}þct=~S R/~/fl-A)JJJ /l4L !/A/JTe-1J NEï7i-o~/.5T CAut'(,J, RIVeg 07\K'5 I1,A-SOÑiL l-ob6-~ -# 131/ R~6-/.sT1::lœ:.-1) Pj¿ðEëSS¡ONÆ(.. EAlG-/~1! ~ ê-027t6ô (¡JJ 0#101 / Comment (About yourself, why you wish to serve, qualifications and other pertinent info~mation.) 7t; 455/57 /. 5#-ARE /A/ ooR LOCAL- ~I / V GtJV e r>1 >n/91lL~ / AC T/ tI i 7ï es A-"vD ,12135 poAl5 J B) L-J 7J za::; ,. .. --.-...---.....-.-.--------- -------- . ----- PROFILE FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS Name /I AN 3 úJ. I(Ós s L. é..~ . .Address hCflb SUNC¡f£~r C, Employer BE.ll. Ik LIC()pr€~ 12 xTJeO"'¡ Phone: Home 2 tf I S-/6 c¡ Qffice Wife's Name CII~YL /Î-NH Children's Name and Ages Kit/úV I ç Jõrl AI /2 , " 280 Z7Zg /'5716 Residen t of the Ci ty since tiOv 79 Previous Residence 8u BÆoOK , Tx Occupation ~~/~~~ Memberships, Organi za tions and Previous Experience on Ci tOy Commission: .5'1&71.4 £oT"" £,rJ£ILO/V¡ tlM4-~MT ¿(OtV()Æ Ç'OC/éTY ~omment (About yourself, 'why you wish to serve, qualifications and other pertinent information.) .r,4rl /f¿~#$ CoNCUN~tl I'/1JOUT 1JI¿ fl16tlV ~OC/~ ¡.It.-US ()~ tf,f,H/3L.Æ.s. Or 7H¿ CO/tI-tG/Allct. ---._-----~_._---- . Ii: DATE: September 13, 1982 . · · 7 - "' . SUBJECT: PZ.82-20 DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Planning and Zoning The owner h~s~uested thi s b~ postpon~d _ .. " . ' · tf . .. . . . ... !.\ .- CITY COUNCIL ~CTION IŒQUIRED: BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOUNT NUMBER: YES NO ---~-----~-----~~~-~~~--~~-~-~---~---~----~-~~--~~-----~-~--~~~~~-----~~~-~~--~ . -DATE: September 13,. 198·2 .,. ( - " , . SUBJECT: Ordjhance for PZ 82-20 . DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zo"ning - BACKGROUND: The owner has requested this be postponed. " " ; - ~ . ~.... .- !., , . . . CITY COUNCIL ~CTION lŒQUlRED: BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: ---~-~---~-~~--~~~--------~-------~~-~~~----~~~-~~--~-~----~--~--~~~~--~~--~--- . . . . City of ~orth ~ichland W11s Star of the ~etroplex Rodger Line City Manager Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator Platting case to be heard by council Sept. 13, 1982 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PS 82-25 APPROVED by P & z DATE: Sept. 9, 1982 Request of Lena Silay for final plat of Lot 1, Block 14, Glenann Add i tion. (817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118 To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records DATE: September 9, '1982 ..-;} I - ., , . SUBJECT: PS 82-25 Final plat of Lot, 1, B"lock 14, Glenann Addition . DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoninq. . BACKGROUND: This property is located on the south side of Martin Drive at the; intersection of Martin Drive and Simmons Road. " The owner agrees to pay the pro rata: share of the fu.ture 6" water line in Martin Roa'd9 but would prefer not io"escrow the $339.26 at ~i~ timè, but would~ather sign a covenant agreeing to pay at the time the water line' is constructed. . The owner has siqned a covenant aqreeinq to þa~ pro rata share for future str~et. çurb & , gutter, and drainage on Martin Roa-d. . The Planning and Zoning Comm-issi:on recommended .approval of this' final plat. .. . . . .... !., -.. CITY COUNCIL ~CTION ItEQUlRED: Approval or denial of final plat. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ~~. b-- (l a1~~ · ¿r- -----~---~-~-~-~--~---~--~-~-~--~-~-----~----~-~~-----~~--~---~-~--~~--~----~--~-- . i- Page 2 p & Z Minutes August 26, 1982 \ 1. . PS 82-24 POSTPONED ( \. Ms. Nash made the mo · ostpone PS 82-24 arification of the 1S made. 3. PS 82-7 4. .PS 82-25 (. PS 82-7 APPROV ED PS 82-25 APPROV ED 5. PZ 82-21 This motion was' seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. Request of L. E. Sattawhite for preliminary plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 14, Glenann Addition. Request of Lena Silay for final plat of Lot 1, Block 14, Glenann Addition. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Sattawhite and Mrs. Silay in their requests. Mr. Stembridge said the preliminary request was for Lots 1 & 2 of Block 14, but the final plat was on~y for Lot 1. Mr. Stembridge stated they have complied wi'th a 11 the Ci ty Eng; neer I s comments. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 82-7. This motion was seconded',by ~1r. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 82-25. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Burk Collins to rezone Maroaks Addition from its prese classification of IF-9-160 amily Dwellings to a propos assification of 2F-9-Two Fami ellings. This proper located south of Dougl e where Douglas Lane ends its rly direction and begins its northerly direction. Burk Collins came forward. He said he is a local developer presently developing a retail shopping center on Rufe Snow. Mr. Collins said he was requesting to build 2100 sq. ft. duplexes. . . . . ¡r' \ ',- Delbert R. Stembridge cons~ltlng engineer August 19, 1982 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lot ,1, Block 14, G1enann Addn., Final Plat, PS 82-25 In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated August 12, 1982, we offer the following comments: 1. The owner a~rees to pay her pro rata share of the future 6" water line 1n Martin Road to serve Lot 1. However,_she would prefer not to escrow the $339.26 at this time but has signed a covenant agreement to pay her share at that time when the. water line is constructed. The owner has also signed a covenant agreement to participate in future curb and gutter, paving and drainage improvements on Martin Road. 2. The dimensions to the centerline of the existing,lO~foot telephone easement has been verified on the ground and these dimensions have been added to the plat. If there should be any further questions regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, DRS/et cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, _Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works 3729 Flory. North Rlchland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-1363 . . . . \\ , KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas Augus t 12, 1982 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-848, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, GLENANN ADDN., LOT 1, BLOCK 14, FINAL PLAT, PS 82-25, (GRID 89) We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Please see our comments regarding Items 2. and 4. in our letter dated February 26, 1982, regarding water line pro rata and future street improvements participation. 2. Dimensions to the centerline of the 10-foot telephone easementt which crosses the northwest corner of Lot 1t should be shown on the plat and verified on the ground. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivisiont please do not hesitate to call. /' It RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG, · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 ':' (,.~ r . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas February 26, 1982 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-848, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 14, GLENANN ADDITION, 5th FILING, PS 82-7, PRELIMINARY PLANS, (GRID 89) . We have revieweà the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Before approval of this platting we would suggest that the Developer be required to furnish evidence to the City that percolation tests . have been performed on the existing septic sewerage system which serves Lot 2 and that the Health Department is satisfied that this system is in full compliance with their criteria. - .;. 2. The Developer should be required to escrow his pro rata share of a future 6-inch water line requir~~ent in Martin Road to serve Lot 1. We would estimate pro rata at $4.50 per linear foot for a total length of 75.39 feet. 3. Utility companies should be consulted regarding their requirements for easements to serve these lots. 4. The Developer should be required to sign a covenant agreement to participate in future curb', and gutter, paving and drainage improve- ments on Martin Road in accordance with the City's assessment policy. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R~JA/l j c cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development Mr, ,Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works . 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG, · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 • DATE: 9-9-82 SUBJECT: Request for water service DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: This property is located at 7724 Precinct Line Rd. south of L. D. Lockett Road and north of the County garage in Tarrant County. outside of the City limits. I must recommend that this request be denied. This is a 2" main that is over a mile long and we have had complaints from our customers about lack of water. To add to the problem there is a mobile home park on this line. • • • • CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve/Disapprove BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: /y) �p �1 Y - LY ' __ /1011 ~ . . . Mid-America of Texas, Inc. P.o. BOX 307 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 Septer:lber 8, 1932 City of ~:orth Richla~à Hilts, lexas To 1".-b01:1 It :,:ay Concern: l.:iè-/iI:1erica. of Te;{as, L."1c. is reque sti:1E; a ~.¡ater té:.p f1'o:11 the Cit~,. of l~orth Rich.land ~lls. Lià-)':-:1erica. of 'Xexas, Inc, a construction CO~~;:>ê.ny, hé>.s a nevl build ins; loc~ted at 7724 Prec1..."lct Line 1-!hich is in the County al1d 011 the Ea.st Side of Precinct Line ~~-.d. '~Che Cit~,. of iJorth ~licht~jd Iii.lts has a ~¡ater line on the ;iest Siàe of Precinct Line Rd. At the prese~t time there is ~~t any water to t~e new builàins. There 1'rill be a person t·:,orldng at the neu builàing, '~!1erefore it is necessary for us to have lJa.ter. 5:incerely ~~ ~,~ Sha.r011 K. Ten.~Jrson President (817) 281-6990 METRO 498-7516 .. .. . ,DATE: 9-1-82 SUBJECT: Change in Nuisance Ordinance DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: This department is requesting' a change so that we can save staff time in notifying people about mowing high grassand.weeds. We would send a notice once a season to the people that we constantly.have problems with 'concerning their high grass and weeds. The notice wóuld read s~me~hing like the following: "This is to notify'you of grass growing on your. property. higher than'12" in'violation of . Ordinance 46l~ You must comply with Ordinance 461 within 10 days. and also . maintain. this· property for the. balance of ·the year as this is the only. notice .. you will receive.". - CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQtTIRED: Approve change in ordinance ~, BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO Accom~T 1~ID1BER: tIÞ _______________~___________~__~--~------------------_______________ . . . .. ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that ORDINANCE NO. 461, "Nuisances", adopted April 9, 1973, and as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended at Section 4.00 to read as follows: "SECTION 4.00 IMPROVEMENTS; EXPENSE: In the event the o~er of such property, or the person responsible for such nuisances, shall fail or refuse to comply with the provisions of this ordinance witbin ten (10) days after notice to do so, the City may abate such nuisance, or cause the same to be done, and make payment therefor, except that only one (1) ten (10) day notice per calendar year will be required for the violations listed in Sections 2.34 and 2.35 unless ownership of the property changes. The expenses incurred in so doing or having such work do~e, or such improvement made, shall be chargeable to the owner of such property or the person responsible for s~ch nuisance, and such charge shål1 be a personal liability of such owner or person to the City. Said notice may be in writing, served upon such owner or person in person by an officer or employee of the City, or it may be by letter addressed to such owner or person at his post office address. Or, if personal service Day not be had as aforesaid, or if the owner's address is unknown, notice may be given by publishing a brief summary of said ord¿r as many as two (2) times within ten (10) consective days in some newpaper of general circulation in the City addressed as "Sanitary Improvements", "To Whom It May Concern" '. and such, publication shall be deemed sufficient notice". Passed and approved this day of ,1982. ATTEST: Mayor - Dick Faram City Secretary, Jeanette Moore APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney, Rex McEntire I~ DATE: September 13, 1982" . SUBJECT: COMPUTER BID DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: Our IBM System 34 is currently operating at maximum capacity. The disc storage capacity is configured at 128 ME and the memory at 128 KB (see attached drawing). Applications we now have include: Pay~oll, Accounts Payable, Municipal èourt, Utility Billing/Collection, Central Cashier,- Tax_Bi~ling/co;I.iection, and General Ledger. We are also under coritract with GrapevineandEUless·to jöintly-develop a library system for our City. The programming is nearly finished and installation at Grapevine is currently underway.' We anticipate'adding the library system to our aomputer 'in mid- .1983. We are also actively working on a police dispatch system, accounts receivable (including assessment payments) and budgeting. Preventive maintenance and vehicle maintenance systems are also being considered: OÙr enhanced storage capacity will 4IÞ permit us to proceed with these appiications as well as permit normal g~owth in our . three biggest operations (Utility Bill~ng, Tax and Court). We advertise.d for bids for the System 34 enhancement as required. IBM submitted the onlý ·'bid. Reconunend the bid of $30,910 be accepted. CITY. COUNCIL ~CTION IŒQUIRED: Award contract in the amount 'of $30,910 to IBM BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: Revenue Sharing ----------~---------------~---------------~--~~~------------- 4IÞ . ·~Cd rcM~ "0 QJ QJ Cd en Q) ens"O eM ~ en QJ U) J-f QJ J-f 4-f C'd fJ) QJ (J~O..o -r-I4-f o ÞC: en J...4 QJ ~ ~ = = ~ ~M 0 C'd en ==' eM -r-I J..& CI) eM 0 C'd .&.J ~ er-f Src (J ~ C'd = <1J ~ 0 Cd "'"" ==' J-f -r-I = QJ ~ 4-f Cd ..c= ~ QJ QJ.µ 0 \0 ~ C'd J-f S U"1 () ~ QJ er-f 4-f "0 N C'dCd~'µOQJ ~l <1J rc ~ en g;a 0 QJ QJ tI) .µ en QJ: en en (]) ªr CO < ..c: ~ ~ ==' c.J N QJ .&.J f..( 0 C'd 0 M "0 I o ~ c.J J...4 cd bOSenQ)~ J-f ~S::QJQJ..o ~ bO ~eMSJ-f 00 Cf.) ~ O~:: ~ s:: ~ þ . ffi J..& ~ 0 -M '"-' OO=='MQ) ,:Q ~ ~.&.Joen..c H "'"" ~ ~ C!J ~ \0 Lf'\ 0 ,:QN ~ ~ Cf) CO 0 N.¡..J to) M Cf.) Q) H "0 ~ Cd J-f . bO ~ Þ "'-" "'"" æ J-f ÞC bO 0 s:: .... eM P-4 ~ '"-' tI) (J ~ QJ S M Q) QJ ~ Q) ODM M Q) ~ be CI) s:: 0 J..& ..0 () en 0 C'd eMU QJ ctS ctS ~ .... ~ ~ " öO ~ p.. CI) P-4 ~ bO "t:J C'd Cf.) CU eM c= Q) P-4 .µ s:: .µ . ,:Q eM ~ ~ J..& 0 C'd ~ (/) 0 eM 0 ~M MM~ .µ 0 p.. .µ .µ er-f C'd M QJ s:: ~ p.. Cd eM ,:Q .¡..J J-f o eM ==' :3 (J M f-4 Q) J-f..c= 0 (J CI) eM eM ÞC: =' ~ ~en c.J fJ) M .µ C'd 0 QJ C'd C'd (J -M ~ p.. Þ~Uc..?p..U< ~ ~ ~ H ~ o N ~ o \0 ~~ o N "0 s:: ~ QJ C'd eM bO Cd Cd "'""~.... CI) 0 ,.. Q) .µ =' .c: en o.µ Q)"O (J s:: C'd C'd ~ CI) öO ~ ~ ~ eM "CC::OOf-4'µQJ s:: -r-f '" 0 J..4 J..& ctS ~ 0 C'd "O.µ CI) ~Q)C'dN ~ ,:Q J..& 0 Q) C'd HOQJN..c=..c: "'-"'µf..( .µ~ enctS4-f CI) 0 $-I en a QJ ~ 0 r:: C'd J-f 0 S 4-f 0 $-I C'd S:::3 eM. be S "'d .u ~ o C'd (]) eM (]) c.J r-i ~.µ~ s:: d ~eM ~ Cd eM eM =' C'd '1j S C'd 4-f "0 r-f · .u r-f $-I C'd < c:: 00 ""d < QJ Q) -M r:: Q) is $-I C'd eM ..c= 10< .SNCIJ .µ ~ eM eM ~ CIJ (]) .u Q) s:: M C!J :3 be eM..o C'd p.. <c.JC'dc.J bOS ~ J..4 C'd .µ $-I 0 0r-40~tI)O(J ~r-i+JCd::SQ)c.J Cf.) ctS t1) CJ S J..4 C'd . . . ..... ---., - -- - -----. - - ---- - - - - - - - ---.-- - -- -- - - ---- - -- --- - - - --- - ------- ----- ~- ------- --- - . - International Business Machines Corporation One Summit Avenue Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817 f870·4000 August 4, 1982 Ms. Jeanette Moore City Secretary City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Ms. Moore: Thank you for your request for proposal you submitted to IBM for the upgrading of your installed IBM System/34. Some of the areas we feel are key as to why you should continue to do business with IBM are listed below: o IBM maintenance is second to none in the industry. This local ~ervice is available 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. o IBM's commitment and expertise in the office product and data processing fields. You will be supported locally, regionally, and nationally by experts in data processing applications. o Quality Education. IBM provides extensive education for all people in your organization, including the executive; not only at the initial installation, but over the life of the product. o IBM Support Is On-Going. Both technical and consultive support is provided as long as you remain an IBM customer. A system engineer will be assigned to your account and will be responsible to assist you in the planning, implementation, and continued operation of your equipment. We trust that it is clear that your best solution is with IBM. We at IBM respectfully request your full commitment to the implementation of these IBM System/34 enhancements. Sincerely, '7ìt,t(AAf á1v,,-1&-/e~ Mary Ann Rakolta Marketing Representative ~-7ð?a~ß M. G. Marsalis Marketing Manager /wjw 36G6Al.2157.1 . . . .... . '. Present 128 MB Upgrade to 256 MB Present 128KB Upgrade to 256 KB TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASE PRICE $22,530.00 8,380.00 $30,910.00 This bid is good for 90 days. 36G6A1.2157.2 . . ,DATE: 9-8-82 SUBJECT: Replaced North Hills Water Line DEPARTMENT: Utility On about 9-1-82 we discovered a water line had been uncovered in BACKGROUND: Fossil Creek by the heavy rains. The line w~s dangerously suspended above the creek and sµbject to breaking at anytime.. We considered this to be a bad situation in which we could not go through the bidding process. Reason being that if the line gave way, North nills would'be left with little or no water. We put in a newline encased in concrete and buried it deeper than the original line. . - CITY COUNCIL ACTION J1EQtrIRED: Ratify staff action and approve payment $12.652.10 to Leonard Hazel Inc. ~, BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO Accom~T 1~m1BER: 11-02-4402 Oversize Mains ~ -------~-------~-----------~-~---------------------------------------- .. . ... LEONARD HAZEL, INC. ....................................... General Contractors, P. O. BOX 48098 WATAUGA, TEXAS 76148 PHONE: Metro 498-0055 Periodical Estimate No.: 1st & Final Date: Sept. 8, 1982 Name of Contractor: Leonard Hazel, Inc. Address: p. O. Box 48098, Watauga, Texas 76148 Project: Water Cross i ng for Foss i r Creek in the City of North Hlchland Hills, Texas. Original Contract Cost: 1 2, 652. 1 0 Project No.: Working Days Bid: Item No. Description of Items Unit of Quantity Quantity Unit Value Of Measure Original Complete Price Completed Estimate To Date Work LF 170 170 49.9 8,491.50 EA 4 4 134.0 536.00 EA 8 8 30.4 243.60 EA 2 2 38.0 76.00 Cy 30 30 43.5 1,305.00 LS LS LS 1,000.0 1 , 000. 00 LS LS LS 1,000.0 1 ,000.00 Total 12,652.10 1 . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. . 7. Furnish & Install 10" DI Pipe Furnish & Instal I 10" 450 Bends Furnish & Instal I 10" Retainer Glands Furnish & Instal I 10" Pad 111 Adapters Furnish & Instal I 5 Sack Concrete Removing Old Crossing Cleaning up Creek Bank . WITH RESPECT TO IMATE IS RECOMMENDED QUANT'T'ES CERTIFICATION OF EST JOB COND' SAND PA ._,. F'El~~~SERVATION OF~ . . ~ .Æ .._~ 6- ra - -_.- S ~éHÑ,éÅl CONSTR CTION , Remarks: Total Value of Original Contract Performed: 12,652.10 Recommended for Payment By: Extra Work (Attached Sheet): Materials on Hand (Attached Sheet): Total Value of Work to Date: 12,652.10 "/~¿C~rI~ 0 LEON D HAZEL, INC, Less Retainage: -0- % Net Amount Earned on Contract: 12,652.10 Less: Amount of Previous Payments: -0- Balance Due This Estimate: 12,652.10 . . .* . .. . DATE: 9-8-82 SUBJECT: Payment to Austin Road on Rufe Snow Phase I DEPARTMENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: This street is almost complete it has had it's final layer of asphalt. Total Bid $831,770.71 Less Previous Payments $673,?27.02 $15.8, 54~. 6~ Less This Payment $,42,404.8~ . Ba1an~e Due $116,138.85 - CITY COUNCIL ~CTION I~EQUIRED: Approval of payment of $42,404'.84 to Austin Road. BUDGETED ITEM: ACCOm~T l~UMBER: YES X Bonds NO -------------------------~-~------------------------------------------- . . . RIDDLE KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 2, 1982 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-315, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, RUFE SNOW DRIVE, PHASE I, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 10 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 10, dated September 2, 1982, made payable to Austin Road Company ~n the amount of $42,404.84, ·for materials furnished and· work perfonned on the referenced project as of August 31, 1982. The quantities and condition ·of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment in amount of $42,404.84, be made to Austin Road Co. at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. . RWA:bvg cc: ,Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road ~ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 CON T RAe TOR t 5 - - - - - - - - - - EST I MAT E - - - - - - - - -----------~----._----------~ .ß.ÞD L.È___..~ P 1 OF .t_I LE_ F331: S~ArE NO.- 10 JOB NO.- 3-315 ROJECJ-DESCRJR.T-LON~.SI. &-..D.RA1.N..,J MP_ROV, ON.......RUEE-SNQVL.DR ,-I.H82-QJ0---1.NDU S L_PK___B L VD_.__ WNER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TX DATE- 9/ 2/8; IME CHARGED THRU PERIOD- '·324 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY -.OR--MA.:tER1ALS_J:URN 1 SHE D-AN.D_LA BOR_2EREORMED---1 N-P-ER10D_.ENDJN G~8L31 L8 2_________ ~ORK ORDER DATE- 10/12/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 355 COMPLETION DATE- 10/ 1/8; ITEM DESCR.I P T ION. P R E..'lI_Q_U S-_Ti"tlS . ..UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL ------------------------------------.-------- -------- -------- -------- --------- 1. UNCL, STREET EXCAVATION C.Y.25977.600 2. SUBGRADE STAB. '\AI/LIME SLURRY S.V.40221.000 _3. -L IME-._EO.R_S.IAB..._S_UB.G.RADF TOM 56_8_.0_0 4. SAW CUTS· FOR REMOVAL' OF EXIST. CONe. &. ASPH. L.F. 5. ._.R EMOV_E._EXIS T-._.CURB_&_~UllER-L..,E. 6. CONSTRUCT 61' CURB & 18' t GUTTER. INC. REINF. STL L.F. 8192.00 _7_.,~ t I THLCL.JLLQ~S.J_CO.l!c... FOR MEDIANS:'&: tvtI SC.':',USES .S.F·. .' . 2160.00 '2160.00 8. 5.1 THK CONe. .DRWYS S.F. 1822.00 639.00 2461.00 _9.._6~ THK-c..O.NC...-JlALL.EYS S_.E.~_Q5_2.LO_0------1É.O_0_LQP 44 52_,_Q 0 O. MC-30 OR EA-HVMS PRIME COAT . I"JCl. SANDING .1. _C~2 -OJ~__EA-H~S-A.SPH .---IAc.L COAT . ..... .. 2. TY.A HMAC, 2 t 1 THICK.. (.OMP AC_IED_Il:J_l_CJ:)jlR SE 5 LY_~3Jß_6_._,Q_Q_O º-'.º-º.º-S2¡_fi_6_~_OQ_P 3. TY.D HMAC,COMPACTED 2' 'THK. S.V. 0.00 8818.00 8818~00 4. TY.D HMAC FOR TRANS.'& MISC TON 737.00 37.00 774.00 .~.__r_Y-._D HMAC, 1 1/2' t THICK FQR DETOUR CONSTRUCTION 16. ADJ. WATER VALVE BOXES TO··.· .__.______LI "L~___~IJ~.E E T GRADE 17. TYPE II-A-A REFLECTORIZED TRAFFIC MARKERS ___ª-,-_.I,YPE 1::C REFLECTOR I ZED TRAFFIC MARKERS 9. YELLOW TRAFFIC BUTTONS '_ _.___ .____(~Ori~~~F:_LEÇTQß I ZED) O. WHITE TRAFFIC BUTTONS (NON-REFLECTORIZED) EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.56 0.0 21,._ .1_ß .~_!DIA ~_çL_·...-L.LLRÇP ..L !£.~tl~_1..00 o. 0º---t1_5J~º_Q__t6_...00__L8_~16~9_ 22. 21"DIA. CL. III RCP L.F, 291,00 0.00 291.00 17.00 4947.0 23. 24I'DIA. CL. III RCP L.F. 349.00 0.00 349.00 18.60 6491.4 2 ~'- 21'.!..D I ~.- _ C L !._JJJ_R.Ç-P___________ .L.._..f_. _ __ _11 ~~ ~ª-___l !.9..q__._1J~..2_8___ 29! 50 _.23.4_2 . 7. 25. 33'IDIA, CL, III RCP L,F. 548.00 0.00 548.00 25.00 13700.0 26. 36"DIA. Cl, II I RCP L.F. 1268.00 0.00 1268.00 30.40 38547.2 ~ .-2++ ~ ~1 ~-- 2[· ~-t}}-l~- ~--------t ~-~-~~}~ .;g~--_._. §~ g.~- ..¡ g ~ ~ : § § - -.. ---: ~ : ~ g-- - ~ ~ ~.~ l~ ~. 29, 5' STD. CURB INLET EACH 1.00 5.00 6.00 1050.00 6300.0 30. 10~..STD._CUR8 .JNLE_'t__ EACti.2.pO___.___ 1.0p___ _ 3.00 1410.00 4230.0 31. 15' STD. CURB INLET EACH 8.00 1.00 9.00 2100.00 18900.0 32. 20' STD. CURB INLET EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00 2600.00 5200.0 o. _. . --...- - --- - - 407.00 l~Q_..O_a S.V.46151.000. 0.00025977.600 0.00040221.000. 0_,,0_.0--.5.68.._0_0 UN..IT PRICE AMOUNT 1.53 39745.7~ 0.80 32176.8C 7 7_. _0_ O----B-3~3_6 . ..0_' 0.00 407.00 0.70 _0,. OO___.lf.+_Q,. .O_O__~2.._2 5 ..0.00011200.000 0.00 19.00 0.00 8192.00 284.9C 3,15 . OC 4.23 34652.1é 0.00046151.000 1_.91 4125.6C . 2.93 7210·.7~ 3_._0_5__1_:1 5~8~_6_Ç 0.28 12922.2t .- ...----------- S.V.60000.000 8818.00068818.000 0.05 . S.V.11200.000 E~CH 19.00 EACH 0.00 EACH 0.00 EACH 0.00 ...---..... ...-------- --....--..----...-.. -----...------. --- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -.-----...---+.----.------ -... --_.- - -.. - -~.- ---.----....--.....------.. ----.- ---.....-...-..---...-------.-. 3440.9 2-~_º_O_2.2_¡_4_ß_.~_._6 ... 2.78 24514.0 25.00 19350.0 2..34 26208.0 125.00 2375.0 2.90 0.0 2.78- 0.0 1.58 0.0 ..---------- ---...---..--..-...----- ---.--..-..-- ......--.. --- ---.... .... CON T R ACT 0 R t S ESTI~~ATE - - - - - - - - - - - - --..--- P 2 OF 3 _ F _ 1_ L E _. _ F ~ ~_1 = -- ----------'-----------..----------. --- - ----------------------------------------.------ . -----.-.-- .. - .-- .--- STeT-E NO.- 10 JOB NO.- 3-315 bROJE.ÇT_DESCRIE..T tON~Sl~_&__ºßßJN.___I MPROV. ON RUFE SNOW DR. I H82 0 TO INDUS. PK BLVD H.JNER- NORTH R ICHLAND HILLS -PLACE- NORTH--R I é"Hl.Ãt\Ü)--H-ILLs-'---ii -DATE~--9-/- 2/82 IME CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 324 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY Oß___MA"( ER I.AL~_ _f~B.NLSJi.~D A_ND LABOR PERFORMED IN PER IOD END I NG- 8/31/82 JORK ORDER DA T E- 10/12/81 CALËNDAR 6Ã YS:.--3-S-Ç------- --COMPLËTÎÓ,~-DA-fÉ-::-lö-l1782 ---.----- PR~_'{lOU~___T~ I__?_______ - ~NIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL UNIT PR Zê-Ë--AMOUNT-- ~O. ITEM DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -- - -------- ,,3. 10'STAGE I (HAL F) INLET, INCL. TIMBER COVER __4 L__Z-P_!__S.T A§_E;_L-L~A~F ) I N ~f: T , I N~..L . TIMBER COVER S. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT -. _ .--__ u_ __ S..T_A..__1..1. + 7 1__. ~6. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT- STA. 15+71 j-2-.-__~_T_OR~QRAJJiY AV_~ T AT STA. 23+50 )8. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT ~_TA_~_ 26+32 ~9. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT O.lºR~r_~_~A t~+~¡U~J AT 5 T A. ¿ 9+ 5 5 (I tAt t ) -1. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT -,________S_T -A.__3.7.±..8_Q__.( t t A I_ , ) ,2. CONe. ENCASEMENT FOR WATER LINES, INCL. REINF. STL C.V. .3. .__f LEX. I .B_L E_B ASE..,_CB_U_SliE..D_SlO.NE FOR PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT C.V. ~4. TRAFFIC RESIG. AT RUFE SNOW _n__ -- -______DR .-- &:-- I 1i_8. 2 Q._K. _S_EfUL-----.B D__J,._.._S-L-_O_~--º-9 ____. _Q.. _ Q.º___ ___._9 -~-º--º--Z22__º-~ 0 o. 0 . 00 5. C.O. NO. 1 - 27X43 CGM P AR L.F. 60.00 0.00 60.00 71.93 4315.80 6. C.O. NO.2 PULL BOXES EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 11S.10 0.00 ~-I..__C_._Q.__Nº_L-2_3 I I PV'__c..ON.DU~L.F. 354_._0~_2n~_º0 68_2...._º-~--º--~0_~. 00 8. C.O. NO.3 EXTRA WORK L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 946.31 . 946.31 ...._---_._------~----_.._-------- EACH 9.00 0.00 9.00· 800.00 7200.00 EACH ~.oo .-----..--.. 0.00 ~.oo l~OO.CO ----- --.--- -- - 7500.00 - --.-~-~-$.-~-- ______1-.!_0_º_ -___.9_~._º_º______1 . 0 Ll 7£q_~_q.º--____¡_t~_9_ ~ qQ' L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 1720.00 1720.00 L.S. l.OO 0.00 -- 1.00 '1720.00 - . 1720.00 L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 1720.00 1720.00- -- ----'- L.S. 1.00., 0.00 1.00 1720.00 1720.0\¡ 'L.S. 1.00 ----------- -..------..--.-.-.--....--.-...p----.-.--- .-- ..-- .------...-. -. -""'\-- 0.00 1.00 3280.00 3280.0' L.-.-~_-______1.!_9.0_____._.Q_·_º_º___________1_~.-º_º_ _.~_~.Q_º_ !Qº- ___ 2 ~ 09. Q_Q 0.00 0.00 0.00 78,00 0.00 ---.-- ..--. -- -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.90 0.00 ----- -..------- --..----.. ....-.-.---.-- -..--..-----.-.....--.- -------------..--... --.-_u_________ --- ..------- . --..,..-------~.._-_._-_. -- -------..-----------.. -- -------.---.------ ------- -..---.------ .---..-----_.__._._ .0._- ________.._____ --.-..--.---- ..---------- --------- ---",- ....-.. --...-- ---.---.-- - _.-.. ----...----.- ..----.----------.------.-,. --------_..,.~,-- _. - - ----..-.- --~_. CON T R ACT 0 R 's EST I MAT E P 3 OF 3 - - - --~-~ -~._.~.._~.._.-: .._~_.~---._- ·~-~~--~-~'---~~-~--'---___h____ ,...._.__.f I LE. .F 3315 ST~TE NO.- 10 JOB NO.- 3-315 ROJEC T...DESCR1J~'LI ON~._ S r - & _DRA Hi. I MPROV_ ON_RU.EE_SNOW__DR _._ I H8 20__10_J NDUS --..PK..Bl VD....... WNER- NORTH RICHlAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX DATE- 9/ 2/82 IME CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 324 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY OR..MAT E.Rr ALS E'.URN.ISHED_AND_lA BOR-P-EREORME D__I N-I?.ERI OD__END IN G----8 /31/82_.____._____. 'ORK ORDER DATE- 10/12/81 . CALENDAR DAYS- 355 COMPLETION DATE- 10/ 1/82 o. ITE;~ DESCRIPTION p RE..V_10U 5-T H IS UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE --------------------------.---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- TOTAL UN I_I PRICE AMOUNT -_.-- --~- -------.----.--- -- - _. - . - --_.....- . ----- - - IELD VERIFICATION OF ~OB CONDITIONS ND--C.ON.EI.~~1A-I_l._OtLQLe.A-LQ.UÞ,1,LI I__Il ES DY- 5 ~e. DrAt.¡. Co~y .. --:-~~~-:-·~~·~~--~::..:-~~~~r~.~.:_~___._ ____ (OWNER'S PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE) )ATE- ',19 --_.. -"- -.- .-.-----.- -~- --...-... - -. ---- ----------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PPROVED- N~TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. . ~-c.Ws{J;;T_IttG--E.NG L~E.E R S . . .. .. . ~ y- ------------------~- ----------- -----.-----. ATE- à ~ #:2- ,19 &'1- - - - - - - - - -.....:-- -q.:-_- - - - - - - - -. - --- .- ------ - -..--.--...... TOTAL · · . · . . . . . . . .. 753296.6~ LESS 5. PERCENT RETAINED. . .. 37664.8; [¿.J EE.EB._~ N C_E.___~.__.~_!._.._.___~__~._~ __ ~_ _.~~l.~_q.3 1_~.8_6, PLUS 7, PERCENT MATLS ON HAND. . 0.0' TOTAL. . .. .. . . . .. .. . .. . ... 715631.St L~_SS.YR EV_¡._QJ,J.S-E.A YME,N_I_$..._ ~_~_.__ ._.__.___61.3_~ ~.I._º.?_ DIFFERENCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE.. 42404.84 NOTE-PAY LAST AMOUNT SHOWN OTAl EARNINGS (INCL. RETAIN.)-$ 753296.69 IME CHARGED THRU THIS PERIOD- 324 DAYS TOTAL BID-$ 831770.71 PERCENT- 90.56 TOTAL TIME- 355 DAYS PERCENT- 91.26 -- ------ -.----------- .. ----------._---- ---..---.-------.--- ----...--------------.-- . -------.-.---- -- .---.- _.~.- -.-.. ...--....--.. ------- ----..---------. _.. "..---------- - ---- - --". .__.H ___H_____ .---.--------.------ .- --... - ..- ·___w_______._.. _. _ ...._______ .._.. ,_,.,_ __ _ ._....._______.,.._. _.._.0___.__ _...___. .. --. '---'. -_...-.- ...- . -- -------.---..------------------.--..---------.. ...-" - -.--- -- .. .~ - - . -- # .---.-- ...---. -----¥-. ...._-_. ---.------..-. ---------...- -... ---..-.----.---------.. .. ---¥--.----------..-...--..------------- -.__. ----...- .,.. ....-.. --....-. , ... , -~. ~F:~[l.--'!~£--1~J~~-~.LLrl#.tr_A!L~__~/_L'!1_~,____REQ(!ß._~_T.__Fo~ .. PA YM ENT . . C 0 __N T _. R _A . C _. T... 0 R t S _ EST 1M. ATE P 1 OF 3 ST~TE NO.- io- - - - - - - - - - ~OB ~O:-- ;-;1; - - FILE F3315 ROJECT DESC.f~IPTIOti...._. S_T~&_PR~.l.N~.JMPBOV_~O~ RUFE SNOW DR. IH820 TO INDUS. PK BLVD WNER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE~"'~NORT1i-'R-icHL'AND--HILL-S; ·-TX· DA-TE- .--------- IME CHARGED THRU PERIOD- DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN RqAD COMPANY OR MATER I ALS FUB.N IoSHED_A_NP__~~~PB P..E.R.F9RME D_ I-'i_PER I OQ__..e:NDJ_-'~G- _ August, 1982 pRK ORDER DATE- 10/12/81 . CALENDAR DAYS- 355 COMPL'ETION- D'AT'E~---fò/-"i-I-8'2- -..---------.- ----..... p~_E_V_I_Q~.S TH I__~_________ UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL UNIT P-RI-CE---AMO"lfÑ-t- O. ITEM DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- 1. UNC L. 5 T R E-Ë-r --EX'C- AV.,~T--ioN----------·-c:-~-Y·-2- 5-917-~·6-ÓÕ--- --- ---·----25·~ 977 .6- - _u__ - -----1 ~ -53 39, 745. 73 2. SUBGRADE STAB. W/LIME SLURRY s.y 40221.000 40,221 o.ao 32,176.80 3. LIME FOR STAB. SUBGRADE TON 568.00 568 77.00 43,736.00 4. SAW CUT S -- F-OR ·--REMOVAL---Õr=----------------·---- ... ---.------------------------------.---.-----~----- EXIST. CONe. (, ASPH. L.F. 407.00 407 0.70 284.90 5. REMOVE. EX I 5 T..._'.U.R B__~_ _G_~..'-TiE_B_ ~.~_f_._.___.l.4_º_~_9.Q _____u.___.___.____..___.__h.!~O __________ 4.25315.00 6. CONS TRucr 6 t t CURB &. 18' I . -- - ----.-------------.---.-- GUTTER, INC. REINF. STL L.F. 8192.00 8,192 4.23 34,652.16 1.___4 t · THK __ CL. 8.._2000..2-5 I__CQ~_c.._______._ FOR MEDIANS & MISC. USES S.F, o.õO-2~·1-60-2_;160----- 8. 5 t t THK CONC. DRWYS S.F. 1822.00 639 2,461 9. _6 .'2___ TJ:iK_CONC.~_._'L~~.LEX._S___$._E-~_._3_º_~_2_._0_Q__~_!__~~~__ 4,452 O. MC-30 OR EA-HVMS PRIME COAT .. INCL. SANDING . s.y 46151.000_ 46,151 1 C-2 OR EA-HVRS ASPH. TACK -.-. --- COAT- -- ----------..--.---- -----------s-~v·-60000-~-o-öã---·---8,818~··--· 68;818 - - --_·-o~--o-s------ 3','440.90 2. TY.A HMAC, 2ft THICK COMPACTED I~ 1 COURSE s.y 85186.000 .' 85,186 ... 2.60 221,483.60 -3~---iY~D HMAC .C-OMliACTED21-iTHK.-S. y;-- -.. 0-.00 -----8~8rs---8;818- --------2.78 24,514.04 4., TY.D HMAC FOR TRANS. & MIse TON 737.00 37 774 25.00 19,350.00 5. __IV. D D~~~B~ ¿O~~~~~C-~7¿~K--EOR- S-~-v·lï2oo~ o-öo---- ---- -n ~ 200 -- ------.--- 2; 34 - -- 26,208~ 00 6, ADJ. WATER VALVE BOXES TO FIN. .. S T R E E_I__GR AD E ___ __ ________"_.EA CH ___ _19 ._ 0.0 ______ 7. TYPE II-A-A REFLECTORIZED TRAFFIC MARKERS 8. __TYPE __I ~C__.REF:LE.CIOR I ZED____ TRAFFIC MARKERS 9. YELLOW TRAFFIC BUTTONS -----------. ----( NON-REFLECT_OR I ZEDJ_____EACH____.__._O. 00_.____ o. WHITE TRAFFIC BUTTONS I (NON-REFLECTORIZED) EACH 0.00 1.56 ~~: - ~ ~:. : ~ ~:: - ~t: - -~-~ ~--~~~ ------ t: ~:---1~~î: gg------------~-~~~-----h-------î ~: gg-----~:: :¿;: ~ 23. 24I'DIA. CL. III RCP L.F. 349.00 349 8 18.60 ~'j¡~.~ ~;: ;~::~ ~ ~:- ~t :-~~ ~ -~~~-------t: ~-:--;¡:: ~~U_h----------____--;~: "-~--.--- - ~ ~: ~g -----13: 700: 0 26. 36' 'DIA. CL. III RCP L.F. 1268.00 1,268 30.40 38,547.2 ~.: ~ : : g ~ ~: -~t: -- ~ t~- ~ ~~-------.----- t : ~ :-----i ~ ~ ~ : gg-.. -. -----------1 ~ g~~ : ~ : ~ ~ ~:: ~ ~ ~: ~ 29. 5' STD. CURB INLET EACH 1.00 5 6 1050.00 6,300.0 30. 10· STD.. CURB---INLET..-___________EACH.__________2.00 ________ ..1 d_3 1410.00 _4,230.~_9 31. 15' STD. CURB INLET EACH a.oo 1 9 2100.00 18,900.0 32. 2 O' 5 T D . CUR BIN LET E A C H 2 . 00 2 2600 . 00 5 , 200 . 0 1 . 9-1----q-;-1 ~5 -.60· 2.93 7,210.7.... ~ '0 º_~_~2_,_~!~.·_~~ 0.28 12,922.2£ 19 125.00 2,375.00 ..- -.-.-----.- ._--- . .- - - .--.--.--..-- -,. ..-- -, ... --....-- EACH 0.00 2.90 ----------.-----.- -- .-------- -----.---......----- .,~-..- _.... .- --.--- -- - .--. EACH 0.00 2.78 .'~-'~' '- -.----.--. _.____ __...._____ ____ 1 . 58 _ -. -.. ~~.. .- - - -"-. -- --. ..-'.-----..---.-------..--.-----.--...-..--.......----. --- --....---.-. . - -- _.._- _.. .----.- -.--"- -...- - -.. .. ,.,. , .....- .. ~: ~ .._ _ __ _ -. .. . n ~ .. - -.. ---. -... - -.-. ...-.-- ------ -.--... ~ - ._. - --. C·-O·N··T RAe TO R---'- S--·--··E-S TIM ATE .. S T IMA TE NO. - - - .----. ~OB-NO. ---3-315 ____.~ ._.._.._~___ _.__.___.......__._ RO~ECT DESCRIPTION- ST.& DRAIN.IMPROV.ON RUFE SNOW DR. IH820 'TO ·INDUS. PK BLVD WNER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TX DATE- I ME CHARGEDTHRU-PER I OD·~-DA YS--CONTRACTOR-_. AUS T IN ROAD COMPANY___....._.__....._.__..___~._ OR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- August, 1982 ORK ORDER DATE- 10/12/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 355 COMPLETION DATE- 10/ 1/82 ----- - - - -----.. P 2 OF :: FILE F331: -...---...---..---- -- -----------.----- .. ------------------ o. ITEM DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS THIS UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ------------------------------------ -------- - . ~- --.--..-.--.-- --_. -. ..--___.. __ '__0. ._ _ ._..__.. _______ _~.____.___. ._. ...._ _ ___.__ ._.... . -------- -------- -------- --------- .- --- - '--"'- -- .--.. ----- -_... --. ~ -.---.-.-.. --.-.------ 3. 10'STAGE I (HALF)INLET.INCL. , . TIMBER .COVER_. -__ EACH-___9.00._.___ ...--.-u----_____~__.800.00_..~~~~0 4. 20'STAGE·r (HALFJINLET,INCL. TIMBER COVER 5. 5 TORM - DRA IN__ VAUL T_.A T_.__.____ STA. 11+71 6. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT .._- S T A. . "15+.71 7. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 23+50 L.S. 1.00 1 1720.00 1,720.00 8 . Sf ORM__DRA IN. VAUL T__ AT____.______.______.________._____.._. ___.__._ _ ____..... _ __ .. STA. 26+32 L.S. 1.00 1 1720.00 1,720.00" 9.:~.~~T ~~A ~ ~+ ~~u~~_~~__________L. 5.__..._. 1.00.:__ ._u__.. ________}. __ 1720.00. ._1-, ?2~..00 O. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 29+55 (t tAt.) L.S. 1,09 1 3280.00 3,280.00 1. STORM_ DRA IN -YAULJ_AL__ _____._______.__.__________.._____. __._.__..___. _,___. _ __ .. _ _ 5 T A · 37+ 8 0 (t tAt t ) l. S . 1. 00 1 2500 . 00 2,500. 00 2. CONCa ENCASEMENT FOR WATER ..-. -. --- L I.NE 5 ._,.. I N C L_.__ R E_I.N F_~_ __S.T_L__._ C I._Y,'___ 0 ....00_______ 3. FLEXIBLE BASE, CRUSHED STONE FOR PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT C.V·. 0.00 19.90 4 ._TRAFF IC.R ES I G-._~T_RUFE._SNOW_ _._~______________._.__. _. .~._. ..__ _._ ...____ __. DR. & IHaZO N. SERVe RD L.S. 0.00 2550.00 5. C.O. NO. 1 - 27X43 CGM P AR L.F. 60.00 60 71.93 4,315.80 6... C.O.. NO._. 2_PULL__BOXES__._____. EACH__. .__0_._00_.___.._.__ ______u_..___118. 10 7. C.O. NO.2 3"PVC CONDUIT L.F. 354.00 328 682 4.50 u·-3~069.00- 8. C.O. NO.3 EXTRA WORK L.s. 1.00 1 Z-6-Q-3-atr5';"" 946.31 ._. ----.--- -- ------- --.--.-. ..----.- .- --- -- -- "'. .---------..----- -.-.--..--.--.-.---.--- -...- ------- .-..--.. ---···-·1 ~. 3 I . " ._. _______ ... . -- RwA. -. -.---.--..-.-------.--.--- ~C~~!~~2::~H~ EACH 5.00 5 1500.00 7,500.00 --'-_.- ----.----.--. .----.--.-.. -..------.--- _. -_....._------..__.~ -...--..- _.._-. L.S. -- - - ~_...... 1.00 1 1720.00 1,720.00- L. S '-----1. 00 . ______. ..... _ "_ __._1______ .1720. OO._.._~-' 720. ~O _ __h___ ,_______.._7.8.. _0_ 0 ..__..._____._ -0 __.___..__~ - --------- ----..---.--------. ----.------ .-------- --- -...--- . -- "---" -_._- -...--- ---...--.-- ...-.....-------.. -.--------- --- ...---... - -- -....---..-.- ----- - _... - -----.-., --_. -.-- --- --- - ---------- -.. --..-...---...--.-....-- -.. --_. ---- . .... -- -----... --------...-....------...----... ..---------... ..---..------..-.-..--... ---.--.------ -.-- ._-.. - -. -- ....--.-...---.- --_.... _. ._..._--..-----_._-._--~- -'- -----.....---... .-.. ¡r \.. . , . '., " ....!It.. _~_._....__._ __.___ ..__ ___..___________.___ __..____ _____.. -- --.------------ - ..._---.. _. .-..-.--.- .--.... ... C O__N_.I.R...A.C T OR t S EST I MAT [ ____..__..._.. P 3 OF 3 TtltTE NO.- - - - - - - - - - - -~OB ~O:-- ;-;1; - - FILE F3315 OJECT. [)ESCR!P]IO~:",,_$T.& D.RAIN.IMPROV.ON RUFE SNOW DR. .IH820 TO INDUS. PK BLVD NER- NORTH' R I CHLAN D HfLLS ----.... -- -PLACË': -NoRfR-·RIÓ..íCAr.fó-·· H I U:..s;--fx- 'DA TE _ '-. ----- ___u___ IME CHARGED THRU PERIOD- DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY R MA TER I ALS.. F'URN ISHED._1\ND_.1-AJ~ORPERfORME DJN._PE.R IOD END I NG- _.. ".'. RK ORDER DATE- 10/12/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 355 COMPLETION DATE;';-·lÕ-¡-1/82 ...-----.--- ~.._----_. -...--..---- __~_~_~y .I_OY.S___.__l~.I~. ___________ UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL UNIT ....---------..--.. -._- PRICE AMOUNT . ITEM DESCRIPTION ----~------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ..- -- ". ------..----..---..-....-------.. '-- -.,. -..----------- -- -',- -- J ~~ . . -- --- -.--- --- -... -----..-- ----- .------- -.-- _..-...~ .- - ----......---..----.--..- ----...----- -_.~. -_._-------_._-_.._------------_..~._- ... -__~·o_ 0 .~___..._.~~ __. .. ...__.... ._..._...._ _.__.. _....________..._..___.___ ________ .__._____ ______..____. ..~_ -_._~._~-- - ...---....,. ---_._...,----_._-~_. ~...... ----..,...--... --... .- IELD VERIFICATION OF ~OB CONDITIONS D .CONFIR_M~ItON_QF PAY QUANLLtlES__..___________..______________ y- _ie.7!Z~~~_____ - "___ _0., __________________.____ P OJECT REPRESENTATIVE) u._L_________ t 19~ I _.. ._-þ_. --.----.--------- ------..--....----.-....- --~ þ.- ---..--- _..~._-------_._----------_._. ....~-_.. ...----.- -....------------.-.- -.-. -~--_.__.- oO. __ __..___ -------------------------------------------~------------------------------------- PROVED-_.________-_______..__. .-_TOTAL._.. .' ._. _ 1'_. .' 1_'_ I.. .__.}53, 296.69. OWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS. INC. LESS 5 PERCENT RETAINED. . . . 37,6:64.83'-- CONSULTING ENGINEERS DIFFERENCE. I . . . . . . . . . 71,5,631.86- ------.--------.---~LUS_~_EER.CEN.T__MA_rLS ON_HAN_Q._.. _ TOT A L . . . . . . . . . . u . .' -. ~ . "7 15 , 6 31 ~ 86 -------------------------------- LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS. . . . . -673227.-02 TE - . --.-----...---.----____..__.t19________.D IE.fE_R ENCJ:; DUE TI1IS E S 11 MAT.E_ _. ...42,404,.89 ~~--------------------- NOTE-PAY LAST AMOUNT SHOWN TAL EARNINGS (INCL. RETAIN.)-$ TOTAL BID-$ 831770.71 PERCENT- I ME CHARGED._THRU__T.I::i.IS_P.ER I-OD~__.___.__D.AY- S____I 0.1 A L _T 1M E-__3.5 5... DA.'(S__!:.E RCENI~___. __. ..._. -" - ,.'..---.- _. ...-, --.- --- .---- -- --.--------------------.-.--.-------------......-----..--- ------- -----_.,- "- -.-------- '-'--'-'- - ----_.. - ----- --.-....- --~----- ---.--.. - ~-_. --. ~.._-------_._------- ----- -- .-.-...., -- ----------.--....----...--,. ....-----..--......---.-- . _. . - ._'- - ~. -- --- _._. -- ---------. --..- -- ---------.- -.--.-.----.-.-- . . -.---- -.~--"'--.--,. --..--...-.- -- ----- ~-- _&40. _ . .. - . --- - . - . . .- _.~. - --...-- --- .----. -.._._- ---._--_._----~-------_.__._----- ...--- --.- - - --' ...- þ ... - --~- -- ....... -. -. - -..._--. --- . ----....- ...--. -- - 0 _ ._. .. -_.._.~._.._----- _.. ----.., -----,_._--- ----.----- --.._-~...._-----. ... --- ---'-oO -.---________..____.________ ·_'''4 __ _ __.._ __ _ _ __.._______.._ -._- ....-. .- ~._- ,DATE: Sept~mher 13-. 1982 . - - - '. . . SUBJECT: . Name Change on Permit for Safe of Beer for Off-Premise Co~sumPt1on DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: At the Council meeting on July 26, 1982, a ~~rmit was approved for" the sale of beer at the Gulf Station located on the Northeast corner of Rufe $now and Loop 820, in the name of Mike Sharp as ~equested. We have subsequently been I . advised that the applicants correct l~gal 'nam~ is Dua~e Sharp, and the pe~it should ' be revised accordingly.· - ~ .. .. .. . .. ~-' ., . . CITY COUNCIL ACTION lŒQUlRED: Approve a motion amending the name'on the beer .permit at 5100 Rufe Snow Drive (Gulf Station) to Duane" Sharp. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO N/A ACCOUNT NUMBER: -~---~---~-----~~~-----~----~-~-~-~~----~--~~~-~----~----~--~-~--~~~~~~------- . . . . , DATE: September 13, .1982 SUBJECT: PRESENTATION OF PARK MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT: Administration BACKGROUND: See attached sheet. " CITY COUNCIL ~CTION IŒQUIRED: None required. Formal adoption will be scheduled at a later date. BUDGETED ITEM: x YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: -,-', --------------------------~--------------______~~~~2~~~tr~~~--_______________ . . . .J The attached Park Master Plan began with an appropriation in the 1981-82 budget. Work began in October 1981. The consultants have worked with the Parks/Recreation Commission this past year finalizing the document. On August 10th the Parks Board unanimously accepted it in its present form. The Parks Commission and Staff wish to thank former Mayor Pro Tem Freeman and Councilman Hubbard who spent many hours with the Parks Board and consultants to develop this plan. To summarize the plan is nearly impossible; however, basically Northfield Park is proposed to be the pri- mary site for development of adult recreation. The first increments of bond money ($500,000) has been earmarked for this development as well as some improvements at Norich Park, including jogging trails, playground areas and tennis courts. All Phase One park improvements from 1982-85 total $500,000. Phase Two improvements from 1985-87 total $588,000. Future recommended improvements after 1987 total $2,505,000 which includes $1,000,000 for construction of a swimming pool complex. The Parks Board is opposed to any swimming pool project in the near future. This opposition is primarily because of the enormous cost involved. The subject of a swimming pool has been with us since 1975. A special study of the swimming pool situation is shown on pages 51 through 60. 'The general consensus' of the Parks Board at this time is that the cost is prohibitive and the benefit limited. Acquisition of additional park land, primarily for RYA use, is also included in the study. The $217,000 required to expand Richfield for this use is not budgeted out of the general obligation bonds to be sold in September. The decision on the purchase of this land should be considered separately. L¿~ Dennis Horvath DAJE: . ,..- September 13. -1982 . / ~ SUBJECT: Notice of Texas E]petrir Sprui~p rnmr~~Y's Tnrpntion to . Consolidate DEPARTIIENT: , . The ~ity Attor~ will present this item. . ..- BACKGROL~: ,. ~ '- þ. . :- .. CITY COUNCIL ACTIO~1 I~EQUIRED: BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO /\.CCOt..-NT NUMBER: ----------------~------~~--~~~---------~~--------~~-~--------~~~~-~~-~~-------------~ . . . . ~ () TEXAS. ELECTRIC - SERVICE COMPANY September 8, 1982 City of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas Re: NOTICE OF AN APPLICATION FILED WITH THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Texas Electric Service Company, wishes to inform you that on September 8, 1982 it will. file an Application under Section 63 of the Public utility Regulatory Act for approval of the consolida- tion of Dallas Power & Light Company, Texas Electric Service Company and Texas Power & Light Company as set out on the Application filed with the Public Utility Commission, a copy of which is kept at each of the company·s business offices, including its home office at 115 W. 7th Street, P. O. Box 970, Fort Worth, Texas 76101. For your convenience, a copy of the Application and all supporting material filed therewith are attached. In the consolidation, a single electric utility company, Texas utilities Electric Company, will be formed. However, the local service identity of our company will be retained through the Texas Electric Service Division of the new company and the present rates of the companies will continue to apply to their respective customers. While no formal action is required of your city, if you wish to protest the Application, you should notify Texas Electric Service Company, and must file your protest in writing with the Public utility Commission, 7800 Shoal Creek Blvd., Suite 450N, Austin, Texas 78757, within fifteen (15) days. If you have any questions regarding this filing, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, It /: ~;p R. L. Fain Manager . . " ' . . . ~ BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS RE: REPORT AND APPLICATION FOR: APPROV AL OF THE CORPORATE REORGANIZA TION OF DALLAS POWER &: LIGHT COMPANY, TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY ,AND TEXAS POWER &: LIGHT COMPANY DOCKET NO. REPPRT AND APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL O'F THE CORPORATE REORGANIZATION OF DALLAS POWER &: LIGHT COMPANY, TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY, AND TEXAS POWER &:. LIGHT COMPANY TO THE HONORABLE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS: Come now DALLAS POWER &: LIGHT COMPANY, TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY, and TEXAS POWER « LIGHT COMPANY -(hereinafter DP&:L, rES CO, and TP&L, respectively, or Applicants collectively), and file this report, pursuant to Section' 63 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act of the State of Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), of their intention to consolidate for "the purpose of accomplishing a corporate reorganization of Applicants. Applicants seek a determination from this Commission that such corporate reorganization is in the public interest. In support hereof, Applicants would respectfully show the following: I. Applicants are each public utility corporations. This Commission has jurisdiction over the Applicants and the subject matter hereof pursuant to Sections 16 and 63 of the Act. . . . II. Attached and incorporated herein by reference is the, sworn testimony of P. G. Brittain and E. A. Nye. Such testimony, filed on behalf of each Applicant, fully describes the proposed corporate reorganization and explains the benefits to be achieved therefrom. III. Applicants believe that the proposed reorganization, as described in the attached testimony, will provide increased efficiencies and effect cost savings which will be beneficial to Applicants' customers. Applicants believe that the corporate reorganization is in the public interest. IV. The business and mailing address of Applicant DP&:L is Dallas Power &: Light Company 1506 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75201 (Dallas County) Telephone: (21~) 698-7000 The business and mailing address of Applicant TESCO is Texas Electric Service Company P. O. Box 970 115 West Seventh Street Fort Worth, Texas 76101 (Tarrant County) Telephone: (817) 336-9411 The business and mailing address of Applicant TP&:L is Texas Power &: Light Company P. O. Box 22633 1511 Bryan Street Dallas, Texas 75222 (Dallas County) Telephone: (214) 748-5411 -2- . . . V. The authorized representative of Applicant DP&:L is Thomas L. Baker Vice President Dallas Power &: Light Company 1506 Commerce Street Dallas'J Texas 75201 (Dallas County) Telephone: (214) 698-7000 The authorized representative of Applicant .TESCO is E. L. Watson Vice President Texas Electric Service Company P. O. Box 970 115 West Seventh Street Fort Worth, Texas 76101 (Tarrant County) Telephone: (817) 336-9411 The authorized representative of Applicant TP&:L is Louis W. Howard Vice President Texas Power &: Light Company P. o. Box 22633 1511 Bryan Street Dallas, Texas 75222 (Dallas County) Telephone: (214) 748-5411 VI. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Applicants respectfully pray that this Honorable Commission consider this report and application and approve the proposed reorganization as described above as being in the public interest and for such other relief to which Applicants may show themselves entitled to receive. Respectfully submitted, -3- . . , , . ROBER T A. WOOLDRIDGE Worsham, Forsythe &: Sampels 2001 Bryan Tower, Suite 2500 Dallas, Texas 75201 A ttorneys for Dallas Power &: Light Company H. CARTER BURDETTE Cantey, Hanger, Gooch, Munn, and Collins 1800 First National Bank Building Fort Worth, Texas 76102 A ttorneys for Texas Electric Service Company . J. DAN BOHANNAN Burford &: Ryburn 1511 Fidelity Union Life· Building Dallas, Texas 75201 By Attorneys for Texas Power &: Light Company ß¡¡ tJ~ Robert A. Wooldridge For all Companies . -4- . DATE: Spetemb~1::·13: ·1982· Ii - o. - . SUBJECT: Ordinance Authorizing 0 the Sale $4,500,000 in General Obligatron . Bonds DEPARTMENT: Financeo ~ BACKGROUND: Bids for the sale of $4,500.000 in General Obligation Bonds will be opened on ,September 13, 1982, at 6:30 p.m. Bids will be tabulated and a . recommendation prepared for the 'City Coupcil to ·consider during the regular Council , -meeting on this date. ·0 . . . -. . . . ..!^ ., CITY COUNCIL ~CTION lŒQUIRED: Approve Ordinance BUDGETED ITEM: YES x NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: General Obligation Debt Service Fund ...-.---~---'-'-'--- ---~-~--~~~~----~--~---------~~-~~-- . ~. /0 Th-e Women's Center August 18, 1982 of Tarrant County, Inc. 1203 Lake Street . Fort Worth, T exes 761 02 (817) 338-4456 , - ~~ RØc¿,ß,ð' .APE CRISIS PROGRAM .thY Arangio iny Batts Berlyn Bock Marilyn Farris Pat Ferchill Steven Ginsberg Reba Henry Suzanne Lasko Mary K, Ulley Chris Miller Sinc, ere1. y,~ Marty Norman d Loralee Pohl (:;:l/2 Emmy Lou Prescott ~tA ~ Ann Quinn..' ó" ·V· , , R' h ds ~ D. Searcy 'rglnla IC ar Jay Sandelin (Mrs. Byron Searcy) L, Keller Smith President ~nn¡e Trevino-Teddlie HoII~ce Weiner BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICERS: Lynn Searcy President Jamy Black f\.1cCole Vice President Mary Harwell Secretary Jane Tecklenburg Treasurer MEMBERS OF THE BOARD EXECUTIVE DIREcrOR Karen Perkins . Mayor Dick Faram 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mayor Faram, As President of the Women's Center Board, I am writing to request a personal appearance before your City Council on Monday, September 13. The presentation will be for the purpose of requesting financial support for our rape crisis and prevention services. We will contact you by phone the week prior to the City Council meeting to assure our position on your agenda. In the meant~e, if you need a contact person, our program coordinator Jane Bingham will be available to respond to questions. I hope we can count on the City of North Rich1and Hills to assist in supporting this very viable and cost-effective program for Tarrant County. cc: Charles W. Williams City Manager /'\ ~ {'-jY' - ~ , CþY .,J::. Î' ~'''', ,,'0 fY jJ l\. At ^ (}F c» ' ( c) r" ~ )V V ~ \U, V ! \ ~ / ./ . V ,_ \.)..J ! \ >1 \ í ~)' 9/