HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1982-11-08 Agendas •
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS •
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
roe ,e Meeting . November. 8,_ 1982 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
AMBER ITEM • ... • . ACTION TAKEN
— I,
. : I • .M.
•
1. Executive Session to Discuss Personnel, ' •
Land and/or Liti:ation
•
2. Discussion of Nursery School on Maplewood
at Davis Boulevard
3. Discussion of Sanitary Problems and _;=1; _
Possible Solutions (Presented by Mayor
Pro Tem Jim Ramse ) . •
4. Discussion of Contract With Haltom City
for Sanitary Sewer Service to Trails
•
Addition (Agenda Item 1111) _ l• •
_ 5. Discussion of Resolution Regarding the
Use of City Council Chamber and Other •
City Facilities (Agenda Item 1)12)
6. 0" ussion of Other Items
COUNCIL
7:30 P.M.
a��QQ,� , I.^t' �n�
L. Call to Order rintT-�______�__ 'IiN
2 Roll Call vll 1111�a ra
3. Invocation —SWAMI
Page 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS -
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting . November 8, 1982 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
•
NUMBER - . ITEM - " • - ACTION TAKEN
4 Consideration of Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of October 25, 1982
5. Consideration of Minutes of the Special
Meeting of October 28, 1982
6. Presentation of Ten Year Ce rt ifica to
and Service Pin to Dorothy McKnight
and Marilyn Ellis - Library
7. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL HEARING - PZ 82-24, Request of
Claude Byrd to 'Rezone Lot 6, Block 23,
Clearview Addition from Commercial -
Specific Use-Parking Lot to Commercial
.(Located on Maplewood Drive, bounded on
the southeast by Byrd Automotive)
8. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 82-24
9. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 82-44 _Reuuest of
Cross Roads Development Company for Final
Plat of Lots 1-5, Block 10, Snow Heights
North Addition (Located on the east side
of Rufe Snow Drive and north of Proposed
Meadow Crest Drive)
•
'f0. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 82-45, Request of
Dyna-Co Development Company for Final
Plat of Lot 2, Block 6, Snow Heights
North Addition (Located on the north side
of Lewis Drive approximately 200 feet
1 _ _
•
Page 3 CITY OF NORTH RI'CHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting November 8, 1982 , at 7:30 p.m. . in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER ITEM I .:. - , . ACTION TAKEN
•11, Consideration of Contract with Haltom •
City for Sanitary Sewer Service to
Trails Addition •
12. Consideration of Resolution Regarding
the Use of City Council Chamber and
•
Other City Facilities
13. Citizen Presentation •
14. Adjournment
•
•
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820, OCTOBER 25, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order October 25, 1982, at CALL TO ORDER
7:30 p.m.
2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor
Jim Ramsey Mayor Pro Tem
Jim Kenna
Richard Davis Councilmen
J. C. Hubbard
Dick Fisher
Harold Newman
Marie Hinkle Councilwoman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line City Manager
Jeanette Moore City Secretary
Rex McEntire City Attorney
Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager
Gene Riddle Director Public Works/Utilities
Richard Albin City Engineer
3. Councilman Newman, on behalf of the Council, asked Reverend Ron INVOCATION
Smotherman, Smithfield Church of Christ, to give the invocation.
4. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to CONSIDERATION OF
approve the minutes of the regular meeting of October 11, 1982. MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
Councilman Davis stated that on page three the name should be OCTOBER 11, 1982
Loren and not Lawrence. APPROVED
AS CORRECTED
Motion to approve as corrected carried 7-0.
5. Mayor Faram, on behalf of the Council, presented Billy Blackwell PRESENTATION OF
of the Parks Department with a five year service pin and cer- FIVE YEAR CERTIFI-
tificate. CATE AND SERVICE
PIN TO BILLY
BLACKWELL - PARKS
DEPARTMENT
6. Mayor Faram presented the following resolution: CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION -
"WHEREAS, J. Fred Davis has been a leader in the community SPECIAL RECOGNI-
before it was incorporated as the City of North Richland TION
Hills, and APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO.
82-28
October 25, 19£
Page Two
WHEREAS, he has been very supportive of the growth and
development of this City; and
WHEREAS, through his generous support and concern, he
was instrumental in the formation and continuance of the
North Richland Hills Public Library; and
WHEREAS, he has served as an active member of the Library
Commission since its establishment to this' date;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that, in appr'eciation,
the City Council of North Richland Hills, on behalf of
its citizens, recognizes and'commends J. Fred Davis
for his exemplary citizenship and. unselfish service
to the community. The City Council is also pleased to
grant him an honorary Lifetime Membership to the Library
Cozmnission.
Passed and approved the 25th day of October, 1982.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Resolution No. 82-28.
Motion carried 7-0.
7. Councilman Newman moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to
appoint Mr. Bill Fenimore to the Board of Adjustments to
fill vacancy left by the resignation of Dr. Hahn.
Motion carried 7-0.
CONSIDERATION OF
APPOINTMENTS TO
THE BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT
APPROVED
8. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning
had recommended approval with the exception of Item #2
of the Engineer's letter.
Councilman Kenna stated the easements would have to come
from the north side of Watauga Road since there were
houses already built on the south side.
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-27, REQUEST
OF CHARLES OWEN
COMPANY FOR FINAL
PLAT OF LOTS lOA-
19B, COLLEGE HILL
ADDITION (LOCATED
ON THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SMITH-
FIELD ROAD AND
WATAUGA)
APPROVED
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher,
to approve PS 82-27.
Motion carried 7-0.
.
\
t
r.
L..
.
"
9. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and zoning
had recommended approval subject to Item #2 of the
Engineer's letter, installation of fire hydrant.
Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve PS 82-31.
Councilman Kenna asked if the motion was with the exception
of Item #2.
Councilman Fisher stated yes.
Motion carried 7-0.
10.
Mayor Faram advised the council the Planning and zoning
Commission had recommended approval subject to the
Engineer's comments and all had been met.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey,
to approve PS 82-32.
Mayor Faram advised the Council he had a request from some-
one that wanted to speak and with the Council's permission
he would depart from the rules and let them speak.
Councilman Davis asked to reserve the right to ask questions.
~ .
Mr. John Levitt, Levitt Engineers, 3929 Vance Road, appeared
before the Council representing Martin Development Corpora-
tion.
Mr. Levitt stated they had asked for two changes in the re-
quest. One being a street name change from Marilyn to
Meadowridge Court, and the second being that they took
exception to the Engineer's comment #7, requesting concrete
lined ditches be installed by the developer. Mr. Levitt
stated there were two areas in the development that were
basically grade swales, with the deepest swale being one
foot, three inches at the northwest corner of the property.
Mr. Levitt stated the swales were handling a very small
amount of run-off and during the design of the development
they saw no need for having concrete lined ditches.
Mr. Levitt stated he was aware of the City's ordinance
requiring concrete' lined ditches, but they did not con-
sider the grade swales open ditches. Mr. Levitt stated
the developer had provided for the side ,slopes to be from
a four to one slope to a six to one slope 'and could easily be
October 25, 1982
Page Three
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-31, REQUEST
OF JOHN McBROOM FOR
FINAL PLAT OF LOT
1, BLOCK 3, MOLLIE
B. COLLINS ADDITION
(LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF
O'DELL STREET AND
WEST OF SMITHFIELD
ROAD)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-32, REQUEST
OF MARTIN DEVELOP-
MENT CORPORATION
FOR FINAL PLAT OF
MEADOW RIDGE ESTATE
ADDITION (LOCATED
WEST OF RUFE SNOW,
SOUTH OF MEADOW
LAKES DRIVE AND
EAST OF LARIAT)
maintained by and mowed by the residents that would have their
homes there. Mr. Levitt stated he was asking the Council to
approve these requests for the grade swales and not concrete-
lined ditches.
Mayor Faram stated the information he had indicated the de-
veloper was willing to meet all the Engineer's comments.
Mr. Levitt stated they had been trying to work with the City
staff to get the problems resolved and the staff's comment
was that if the developer did not want to put in concrete-
lined ditches then an 18 inch underground storm drain would
need to be put in. Mr. Levitt stated that if an 18 inch
underground storm drain were to be put in it would be over-
designed for the amount of water it would carry.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Levitt if he would be willing to
pay the expense for the street sign if the name was changed.
Mr. Levitt stated that in the filing fee for the plat there
was a charge for ,street signs and they had paid that fee.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Levitt if he was aware that it
would require an ordinance to change the name of the street.
Mr. Levitt stated yes.
- Councilman Davis asked Mr. Levitt if he felt that if a fence
were to be built along the lot lines, it would be a hindrance
to the flow of the water.
Mr. Levitt replied no, he did not feel it would.
Councilman Kenna asked how many of the drainage ditches
would be required.
Mr. Levitt stated there would be two coming from the northwest.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Levitt if he had a big problem with
the street name change.
Mr. Levitt stated they wanted the name changed because it
related to the Meadow Lakes area.
Mayor Faram stated the Planning and Zoning minutes indicated
that there were so many streets in the City that began with
Meadow, that there might be some confusion, therefore, it
should be given serious thought before granting the request.
October 25, 198
Page Four
.
\
\
l
( ,
!.
'. .
.
Councilman Kenna asked if the changing of the street name was
part of the discussion or would a separate ordinance be con-
sidered to change the name of the street.
Mr. McEntire stated it would require a separate ordinance and
it could be put on the next Council agenda.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to amend
the motion, amendment #1, lithe name Meadowridge Court be accepted
and the stipulation that the developer pay· the cost of the street
sign at Lariat and existing Marilyn Lane;" amendment #2, "that
the Engineer's comment #7, requiring concrete lined ditches be
waived and approve drainage swales."
Motion to approve amendment #2 carried by a vote of 7-0.
Motion to approve amendment #1 carried by a vote of 7-0.
original motion as amended twice carried by a vote of 7-0.
11. Mayor Faram advised the council that the Planning and zoning
Commission had recommended approval subject to the Engineer's
comments and all comments had been met.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to
approve PS 82-34.
Motion carried 7-0.
, .
12.
Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and zoning
Commission had recommended approval subject to the
signing of a covenant for a 12 inch proposed water line
on Grapevine Highway.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve PS 82-36, subject to the signing of a covenant
for the 12 inch water line.
Councilman Kenna asked about the easement Texas Electric
had requested.
Councilman Davis stated the applicant had requested that the
easement not be granted because the air conditioner was where
they wanted the easement.
October 25, 1982
page Five
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-34, REQUEST
OF RACETRAC
PETROLEUM, INC.
FOR FINAL PLAT OF
LOT 2, BLOCK 1,
RICHLAND TERRACE
ADDITION (LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF
GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY
AND NORTH OF
EDISON'S)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-36, REQUEST
OF SUE K. FUGATE
AND RAY SINGUEFIELr
FOR FINAL PLAT OF
LOT 4, BLOCK 1,
A. G. WALKER
ADDITION (LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE
OF GRAPEVINE HIGH-
WAY SOUTH OF
GLENVIEW DRIVE
APPROVED
Mr. Riddle stated that Texas Electric had existing lines.
already there and had no plans for the easement.
Motion to approve carried 7-0.
13. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
award the bid to Cooper Machinery in the amount of $10,245.00,
funds to be appropriated from Revenue Sharing.
Councilman Fisher asked why Cooper was the only one that bid.
Mr. Line stated that Cooper ~as not the only one that could bid,
Cooper was the only one that chose to bid.
Motion carried 7-0.
14. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to award
the bid to Cooper Machinery in the amount of $44,333.36, funds'
to be appropria~ed from Revenue Sharing.
f
1
Councilman Hubbard asked the availability of parts for this
machine.
Mr. Riddle stated parts were available in Dallas.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated that the bid looked tailored, of
. the five companies that responded there were exceptions to
four and three others did not respond.
Mr. Riddle stated the specifications included air brakes
and Cooper was the only one that had the air brakes.
Mr. Riddle stated some of the other bids would have been
accepted, with minor exceptions, but the inboard planetary
driving gear made it expensive to work on the units, where
the one that was specified had outboard planetary.
Mr. Riddle stated the only other company that could meet
the specifications, but really exceeded the specifica-
tions, was the Caterpillar.
Councilman Kenna asked if this machine could be easily
maintained and the availability of parts.
Mr. McEntire stated the machine could be easily maintained
and the parts were available locally.
Motion to approve the bid of Cooper Machi~ery carried by a
vote of 6-1; Councilmen Fisher, Ramsey, Newman, Davis and
Hubbard and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Councilman Kenna
voting against.
October 25, 198"
Page Six
CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING BID FOR
VIBRATORY ROLLER-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPART-
MENT
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING BID FOR
ONE ( 1) RUBBER
TIRED LOADER -
PUBLIC WORKS DF
PARTMENT
APPROVED
¡
~
I.
.
15.
Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey., to
approve payment to Sharrock Electric in the amount of
$14 ,6 70 . 00 ·
Councilman Fisher asked if some kind of barrier could be built
around the signal light.
Mr. Riddle stated yes.
councilwoman Hinkle asked how much the city would be re-
imbursed on the signal light.
Mr. Riddle stated the insurance company would pay $10,000.00
and the person that struck the signal light would have to pay
$4,000.00.
Motion carried 7-0.
16.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to
approve payment to Austin Road Company for Rufe Snow Drive,
Phase I, in the' amount of $84,749.15
Motion carried 7-0.
17. councilman Kenna moved, seconded by councilwoman Hinkle, to
approve payment to Dallas Aerial Surveys, Incorporated, in
. the amount of $19,800.00
Motion carried 7-0.
18. Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by councilman Newman, to
approve payment to Harco Company in the amount of
$17,200.00.
Motion carried 7-0.
19.
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Davis,
to approve payment to Austin Road Company in the amount
of $150,415.14 for Dawn Drive improvements.
Motion carried 7-0.
October 25, 1982
Page Seven
CONSIDERATION OF
PAYMENT TO SHARROCK
ELECTRIC FOR SIGNAL
REPAIR AT LOOP 820
AND RUFE SNOW DRIVE
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$14,670.00
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PAYMENT TO AUSTIN
ROAD COMPANY FOR
RUFE SNOW DRIVE
PHASE I IN THE
AMOUNT OF $84,749.1
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
FINAL PAYMENT TO
DALLAS AERIAL SUR-
VEYS, INC. IN THE
AMOUNT OF $19,800.0
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PAYMENT TO BARCO
COMPANY FOR
CATHODIC PROTECTIO~
AT CONN DRIVE
GROUND STORAGE TANl<
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$17,200.00
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT
TO AUSTIN ROAD
COMPANY FOR DAWN
DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$150,415.24
APPROVED
r
20. Mayor Faram asked the City Attorney if the Council could
take action on this ordinance.
Mr. McEntire stated yes.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey, to
approve Ordinance No. 984.
Motion carried 7-0.
21. Mrs. Doris Crossland, 7816 Daniel Drive, North Richland Hills,
appeared before the Council.
Mrs.· Crossland stated that she was paying $17.50 per month for
sewer and had been briefed o~ how the sewer was figured.
Mrs. Crossland stated that what she would like to know was
what if for the first three months of the year she used $17.50
worth of sewer and her neighbor used only half of that then
what did they do for the rest of the year in the event the
neighbor used more than $he did, but she was still paying
$17.50 and her neighbor was paying only half that much.
Mrs. Crossland asked how this method was determined to be
fair.
r ,,-
)
[ .
Mayor Faram stated the reason the sewer was based on water con-
sumption during those three months. was because it was considered
that would be the least consumption per household during the
year, believing that there was little or no outside watering.
~ Mrs. Crossland stated she was told that the outside watering
had nothing to do with the way the sewer rate was figured.
Mr. McEntire stated the reason the sewer rate was figured this
way was because the City had to do it that way. Mr. McEntire
stated the formula was devised by the Federal Government and
sent to Fort Worth and then was imposed upon the City of North
Richland Hills, therefore the City had no other choice.
Mrs. Crossland stated the people needed to be informed on how
it was done.
Mayor Faram advised Mrs. Crossland that the City had access to
Channel 36 and this information would be placed on the channel.
Councilman Davis stated this information would also be placed
in the City newsletter.
Mayor Faram advised Mrs. Crossland an effort would be made to
inform the citizens.
October 25, 1982
Page Eight
CONSID~RATION OF
ORDINANCE ADOPTING
COUNCIL RULES OF
PROCEDURE
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 984
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
,
~
l
re
ld
e
.
Mr. McEntire advised the Council that a Special Council meeting
may have to be set to take action on Lone Star Gas Company's
rate request.
Mayor Faram set the Special Council meeting for Thursday,
October 28, 1982 at 6:00 p.m.
22. There being no other items for discussion, Mayor Faram
adjourned the meeting of October 25, 1982.,
Dick Faram - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
October 25, 1982
Page Nine
ADJOURNMENT
r.
l
r
e
L. ._
;
I
!. Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
ATTEST:
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820, OCTOBER 28, 1982, 6:00 P.M.
1.
Mayor Faram called the special meeting to order October 28,
1982, at 6:05 p.m.
2.
Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Ramsey
Richard Davis
Jim Kenna
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
staff:
Rodger 'Line
Rex McEntire
Desi Smyth
Press:
Jeff Yeates
Absent:
Harold Newman
J. C. Hubbard
Jeanette Moore
3.
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilmen
Councilwoman
City Manager
City Attorney
Secretary
Mid Cities Daily N~ws
Councilman
Councilman
City Secretary
City Attorney McEntire briefly discussed Ordinance No. 985
(copy attached).
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey, to
approve Ordinance No. 985. Motion carried 5-0.
4.
Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of October 28, 1982.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE EXTENDING
TIME FOR STUDY OF
LONE STAR GAS FOR
RATE INCREASE AND
ESTABLISHING
INTERIM RATES
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 985
ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram - Mayor
,
I.
re
L ..
.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820, NOVEMBER 8, 1982, 7:30 P.M.
1.
Mayor Faram called the meeting to order November 8, 1982
at 7:30 p.m.
2.
Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Ramsey
Jim Kenna
J. C. Hubbard
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
Harold Newman
Marie Hinkle
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Counc ilmen
COWlcilwoman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
Richard Albin
Dennis Horvath
Gene Riddle
City Manager
City Secretary
City Attorney
City Engineer
Assistant City Manager
Director Public Works/
Utility
Planning & Zoning Members:
Margie Nash
Don Bowen
Press:
Les Harper
Jeff Yates
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Mid Cities Daily News
3.
The invocation was given by Councilwoman Marie Hinkle.
4.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna,
to approve the minutes of October 25, 1982.
Motion carried 7-0.
5.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve the minutes of the special meeting October 28,
1982.
Motion carried 6-0; Councilman Hubbard abstaining due to
absence from the meeting.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1982
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING
OCTOBER 28, 1982
APPROVED
r.
I
r.
l "
( .;þ
.
5.
Mayor Faram presented Dorothy McKnight of the Library
with a ten year certificate and service pin.
Mayor Faram presented Marilyn Ellis with a ten year
certificate and service pin for ten years of service
in the Library.
7. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. Claude Byrd, 7924 Maplewood, appeared before the
Council.
~. Byrd stated; he would like to request that the Council
approve his request for commercial zoning. Mr. Byrd stated
he had been in business in North Richland Hills since 1959.
Mr. Byrd stated the reason he was requesting for a change in
the zoning was because the lot in question was zoned speci-
fically for commercial parking with the exception of a 20 x
25 foot section close to the existing building. Mr. Byrd
stated the primary reason for the request was so they could
use a lift that had been installed to do retail type service
work, oil change, lube and steam clean cars. Mr. Byrd stated
the lift would be moved but it would be an economic hardship
at this time. Mr. Byrd stated the lift was not being used
. at the present time because of the zoning requirements.
Mr. Byrd stated he did not know he would need a building
permit before installing the lift.
Mr. Byrd asked for rebuttal time if necessary.
Councilman Newman asked Mr. Byrd if the lift was embedded in
concrete or setting on top of the concrete.
Mr. Byrd stated the lift was setting on top of concrete.
Councilman Newman asked if the lift was electric or
hydraulic.
Mr. Byrd stated the lift was electric and had its own
hydraulic power.
Councilman Newman asked if the lift could be moved.
Mr. Byr~ stated the lift could be moved, there was about
ten feet behind the building that was zoned commercial,
but it would be inconvenient plus expensive to move it.
November 8, 1982
Page Two
PRESENTATION OF
TEN YEAR CERTIFI-
CATE AND SERVICE
PIN TO DOROTHY
MCKNIGHT AND
MARILYN ELLIS -
LIBRARY
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL HEARING
PZ 82-24, REQUEST
OF CLAUDE BYRD TO
REZONE LOT 6,
BLOCK 23, CLEAR-
VIEW ADDITION FROM
COMMERCIAL-
SPECIFIC USE-PARK-
ING LOT TO COM-
MERCIAL (LOCATED
ON MAPLEWOOD DRIVE
BOUNDED ON THE
SOUTHEAST BY
BYRD AUTOMOTIVE
:.
.
.
Councilman Newman stated he realized to move the lift would
be inconvenient but it was also inconvenient before the City
granted a specific use permit for parking cars.
Mr. Byrd stated the property had been improved considerably
since he had purchased it.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked Mr. Byrd why he did not think
about getting a building permit before installing the
lift.
Mr. Byrd stated he did not ,realize he needed a permit.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked Mr. Byrd at what point he realized
he needed a peEmit.
Mr. Byrd stated when he received a call from the City.
Councilman Fisher asked if an automobile was placed on the
lift could it be seen from the street and the neighbors.
Mr. Byrd stated yes.
Councilman Fisher asked if the lift were to be removed, would
it still be visible from the street and would it be on com-
mercial property.
Mr. Byrd stated it would still be visible from the street but
would be on commercial property.
Councilman Davis stated that in the Planning and Zoning minutes
of September 23, 1982, Mr. Byrd stated it would cost $10,000 to
move the lift. Councilman Davis asked Mr. Byrd if this was a
correct statement.
Mr. Byrd stated yes, the estimate he had on the concrete and
moving the drain was $10,000.
Councilman Davis stated the minutes also stated that Mr. Byrd
had to flush radiators out into the street.
Mr. Byrd stated that was correct, they had flushed the
radiators in the street for the last thirteen years before
the lift was installed.
Councilman Davis stated that the minutes reflected that one
of the Planning and Zoning Commissioners had asked Mr. Byrd
if he would be interested in only zoning the 19 x 25 foot
section.
'November 8, 1982
Page Three
.
re
l
.
Mr. Byrd stated he would have no objection to only zoning the
19 x 25 foot area.
Councilman Davis stated the minutes indicated that Mr. Byrd
wanted the whole lot zoned commercial because it would be
less confusing.
Mr. Byrd stated that was a correct statement, he felt it would
be less confusing if the whole lot was zoned commercial, but
would have no objections to just the 19 x 25 area being zoned.
Councilman Davis asked if the 19 x 25 foot area were zoned
commercial would that allow Mr. Byrd to keep the lift where
it was presently located.
Mr. Byrd stated"yes.
Councilman Davis stated that Mr. Byrd had also told the Plan-
ning and Zoning Commission he did not realize he needed a
building permit.
Mr. Byrd stated that was correct, he did not realize the lift
was considered a permanent structure.
Councilwoman Hinkle stated she was not too concerned with
what was already on the lot, but was concerned that some-
thing else might be built there. Councilwoman Hinkle asked
if Mr. Byrd would have to obtain a building permit if he
wanted to build on the lot.
Mayor Faram stated yes.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked if the 19 x 25 foot section was
zoned commercial would it only be large enough to accom-
modate the lift.
Mr. Byrd stated he had no plans to build a building on the
19 x 25 foot section.
Councilman Newman asked how far from the present site would
the lift have to be moved to be legal and would it still be
visible from the street.
Mr. Byrd stated the lift would have to be moved approximately
ten feet from the present site and it would still be visible
from the street.
Councilman Newman ask~d if there was existing concrete where
the lift would be moved.
Mr. Byrd replied yes, but more concrete would have to be
poured.
November 8, 1982
Page Four
r.
¡
I
l
.
.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Byrd if there were ten feet behind the
existing building that was commercial.
Mr. Byrd stated yes.
Mayor Faram asked where the 19 x 25 feet came in.
Mr. Byrd stated that was the section he would need to
use for the lift.
Mayor Faram asked if the lift was nineteen feet, how
could it fit into ten feet.
Mr. Byrd stated the lift was only ten feet wide.
J . ..;
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked the Staff if they agreed
it would be legal if the lift were moved.
Mr. Line stated that if the existing zoning was com-
mercial and what Mr. Byrd was asking for was com-
mercial, if it was permissible in what was being
requested on one piece of ground then it would be
permissible for what he was requesting.
Councilman Kenna asked if there would be require-
ments in setbacks and if there were easements
there.
Mr. Line stated he was speaking only on the zoning, the
property line would have to be examined to see if all
the other requirements would be met.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Byrd to show him on the map
exactly where the lift would set.
Councilman Davis stated the lift would still be on
Lot 6.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposi-
tion to this request to please come forward.
Mr. Kenneth Fickle, 7908 Maplewood, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Fickle stated this was the third time this request
had been heard, once in a Planning and Zoning meeting
in 1981 and was denied. Mr. Fickle stated the Planning
and Zoning Commission heard the request again last month
and it was denied again. Mr. Fickle stated he would
November 8, 1982
Page Five
r.
I
l
continue to do what was necessary to keep the lot from being
zoned commercial. Mr. Fickle stated he felt that ít would
devalue his property and property in the area if the lot
were zoned commercial. Mr. Fickle stated the main issue
before was the parking lot and the City was told there
would be no more building on the lot, if the entire lot
was zoned commercial there would be more building.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated that if Mr. Byrd moved the
lift and the property met all the requirements there
would be nothing the City could do about the lift.
Mr. Fickle stated he realized nothing could be done
but he did not want the lot zoned commercial.
t . .:
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked Mr. Fickle what his main
objection was.
Mr. Fickle stated his main objection was the lot being
zoned commercial.
r
le
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
granted Mr. Byrd rebuttal time.
Mr. Byrd stated he neglected to mention previously
that his business hours were 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
8.
Mayor Faram advised the Council i~ would take a three-
fourth's vote for passage because it was an appeal
hearing.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to deny PZ 82-24, Ordinance No. 987.
.
Councilman Kenna stated the Council had reviewed this
potential zoning before as requested, straight com-
mercial, and came up with the same answers as this
time. Councilman Kenna stated he felt this was a
neighborhood, with a neighborhood street and not
Highway 121. Councilman Kenna stated he was particu-
larly offended by the section where the lift was
although the last time it was going to be a parking
lot and now there is a lift, if it is zoned com-
mercial next time no one knows what would be built.
Councilman Kenna stated he did not feel the lot
should be zoned commercial because there would be
no control over what was placed on it.
November 8, 1982
Page Six
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 82-24
DENIED
ORDINANCE NO. 987
e
November 8, 1982
Page Seven
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman
Fisher, to make a substitute motion to grant the com-
mercial zoning to the 19 x 25 foot section.
Councilman Hubbard asked how the ordinance would read
if it applied only to the 19 x 25 foot section.
Mayor Fararn advised the ordinance, as written, would
have to be changed to grant only the 19 x 25 foot
space.
Mr. McEntire stated this was a request to change the
zoning on the whole tract ~nd it could be considered
arbitrary and capricious if only a portion of the
tract were zoned.
Mayor Faram asked if the motion was out of order.
Mr. McEntire stated the motion was not out of order,
but he wanted to tell the Council of the impact of
the motion.
re
L
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey asked what the impact would be.
Mr. McEntire stated the Council might be zoning the
entire tract.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated the motion was for Specific
Use for a lift; Councilman Fisher agreed with the
motion.
Councilman Kenna asked Mr. McEntire how you could zone
a parcel of land specific Use and not the entire tract.
Mr. McEntire stated the Council would be giving a
Specific Use and not zoning the tract.
Councilman Kenna asked that the motion be restated.
Mayor Faram stated the substitute motion was to grant
Specific Use for the 19 x 25 foot space for the lift,
where it presently sat and turn down the rest of the
application.
.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if since the request
was for commercial zoning and that was what was con-
sidered by the Planning and Zoning Commission and
they had denied the request, how would the three-
fourth's rule apply to the substitute motion.
re
Mr. McEntire stated the substitute motion would require
a three-fourth's vote.
Councilman Davis stated that for further clarification, and
on the assumption that the 19 x 25 foot for Specific Use
supposedly encompassed the whole lift, and the Council had
no documentation showing that the 19 x 25 feet would cover
the lift. Councilman Davis stated he was concerned that
the Council might need to have the documentation before
the substitute motion be granted.
Mr. McEntire stated there was no ordinance at the present
time covering the 19 x 25 feet, an entire new ordinance
would have to be written before the next Council meeting.
Councjlman Newman asked if the substitute motion were
approved could a building' be built on the 19 x 25 space.
Mr. McEntire stated he understood the Specific Use would
be for a lift only.
re
L',
Councilman Hubbard stated the way he understood the sub-
stitute motion was to grant Specific Use for the 19 x 25
existing lift space and reject the commercial on Ordi-
nance 987.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated that was correct.
Councilman Davis called for the question.
Councilman Kenna stated this request must pass by a three-
fourth's vote and possibly Mr. Byrd would like to go back to
the Planning and Zoning Commission with a new request.
Councilman Kenna stated he would suggest the Chair ask
Mr. Byrd his preference.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated he would recommend Councilman
Kenna's suggestion.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Byrd if he would prefer to go back
to Planning and Zoning with an amended request.
Mr. Byrd asked if the request was voted on now and denied,
would he have the opportunity to go back to Planning and
Zoning.
.
Mr. McEntire stated yes.
Mr. Byrd stated he preferred the Council to go ahead and
vote.
November 8, 1982
Page Eight
r.
.
.
10.
11.
Substitute motion failed by a vote of 3-4; Councilman Kenna, Davis,
Newman voting against; Councilmen Ramsey, Fisher and Hubbard and
Councilwoman Hinkle voting for.
Original motion to deny carried 5-2; Councilmen Hubbard, Kenna,
Davis and Newman and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Councilmen
Fisher and Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey voting against.
9.
Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning Com-
mission had recommended approval subject to the Engineer's
comments and all comments had been met.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
approve PS 82-44, subject to the Engineer's comments.
t . .:
Motion carried 7-0.
Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning
Commission had recommended approval subject to the
Engineer's comments and all had been met.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern
Ramsey, to approve PS 82-45, subject to the Engineer's
comments.
Motion carried 7-0.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis,
to approve the contract with Haltom City for sanitary
sewer service to the Trails Addition.
Motion carried 7-0.
November 8, 1982
Page Nine
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-24, REQUEST
OF CROSS ROADS
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
FOR FINAL PLAT OF
LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 10,
SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH
ADDITION (LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE
OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE
AND NORTH OF
PROPOSED MEADOW
CREST DRIVE)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-45, REQUEST
OF DYNA-CO DEVELOP-
MENT COMPANY FOR
FINAL PLAT OF LOT
2, BLOCK 6, SNOW
HEIGHTS NORTH
ADDITION (LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF LEWIS DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 200
FEET EAST OF RUFE
SNOW DRIVE
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
CONTRACT WITH
HALTOM CITY FOR
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE TO TRAILS
ADDITION
APPROVED
Ie
.
12.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Newman,
to postpone action on this item.
Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated that this proposed resolution
was not a unique resolution. Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey stated
he had talked with other cities in the area and they all
had guidelines for use of city facilities. Mayor Pro Tern
Ramsey stated that the guidelines would be studied further
and another resolution brought back to the Council.
Mayor Faram appointed Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey and Councilman
~ichard Davis as a committee to study the guidelines.
Motion to postpone carried 7-0.
12a. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to approve PS 82-40, subject to the Engineer's comments.
re
t
e
Mayor Faram advised the Council that Mr. Gary Teague had
requested to speak on this item and with the Council's
approval he would depart from the rules and let Mr. Teague
speak.
Mr. Gary Teague, Teague, NaIl and Perkins Engineering, 210
West Sixth Street, appeared before the Council representing
the owner, Mr. Bogart.
Mr. Teague stated he would like to bring an item in the
Engineer's comments to the Council's attention and that
. being Item #2 pertaining to construction of a portion
of Holiday Lane and utilities. Mr. Teague stated his
replat proposed to produce four lots located on Bogart
and one of the lots is a side lot to a future extension
of Holiday Lane. Mr. Teague stated the right-of-way
was existing on Holiday Lane, but had not been con-
structed. Mr. Teague stated the applicant would like
to sign a covenant to run with the land for future
street improvements and the utilities.
Mr. Riddle stated the covenant needed to include the land
to the west of Lot IR.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to amend the motion to state "approve PS 82-40 subject
to the Engineer's comments and the signing of a covenant
to run with the land on both sides of Holiday Lane that
Mr. Bogart owned."
Motion carried 7-0.
Original motion as amended carried 7-0.
November 8, 1982
Page Ten
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION REGARD-
ING THE USE OF
CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS AND
OTHER CITY FACILI-
TIES
POSTPONED
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-40, REQUEST
OF TLB-GSC ENTER-
PRISES, INC. FOR
REPLAT OF LOTS
2R-6, REVISED TO
LOTS lR-4R, BLOCK
B, COLLEGE HILLS
ADDITION (LOCATED
ON THE NORTHSIDE
OF BOGART AT
HOLIDAY LANE)
APPROVED
I.
.
.
13.
Mrs. Clevinger, 7824 Maplewood, appeared before the Council.
Mrs. Clevinger stated she would like to know if anything
had been decided on the nursery school on Maplewood.
Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Clevinger what her understanding
of the zoning of the property was.
Mrs. Clevinger stated she understood the school was temporary
and only for Mrs. Haley and no more than ten children.
Mrs. Clevinger stated no one in the neighborhood was aware
that Mrs. Haley was going to take in the garage and make
the whole house into a nursery.
Mayor Faram asked if it was the original owner that re-
m?deled the house.
Mrs. Clevinger stated yes.
Mayor Faram asked that if the sale of the property did go
through and it was used as a nursery school, would it be
considered a nuisance as far as she was concerned and the
neighbors were concerned.
Mrs. Clevinger stated yes, because of the traffic.
Mayor Faram asked Mrs. Clevinger if at anytime had she
or the persons in the vicinity had signed a petition to
abate the nuisance.
Mrs. Clevinger stated yes.
Mayor Faram asked if the City was in possession of the
petition.
Mrs. Clevinger stated the City should be, it was presented
in 1980.
Mr. McEntire stated he thought Mrs. Clevinger was re-
ferring to a complaint filed in Municipal Court.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if there was a petition
on file.
Mr. McEntire stated that if a petition was signed it was
never received by the City.
Mayor Fararn asked if a petition was filed, what avenues
were left open for the City.
November 8, 1982
Page Eleven
CITIZEN
PRESENTATION
re
fe
l
e
~
Mr. McEntire stated it was his suggestion that if the
citizens felt there was a nuisance, then the Council
could take whatever action they wanted to abate the
nuisance.
Mayor Faram stated a petition would have to be filed
before the City could take any action.
Mrs. Clevinger asked if another petition would have to
be signed.
Mr. McEntire stated yes.
Mrs. JoAnn Williams, 7900 ~aplewood, appeared before the
Council.
Mrs. Williams stated that when this case recently went
before the Planning and Zoning Commission one of the
questions she asked was when this was first zoned to
Mrs. Haley if it was a Specific Use permit. Mrs. Williams
stated that when a Specific Use permit was issued it was
issued to the person and not just the property. Mrs. Williams
stated that if the Specific Use permit was issued to Mrs. Haley
then the business was illegal because it had changed owners
once and was in the process of changing owners again.
Mrs. Williams stated she asked the Planning and Zoning
Commission if they could find out if the Specific Use
permit was issued to Mrs. Haley or the property.
Mrs. Williams stated that she thought Mr. McEntire was
directed two or three years ago by the Council to check
into the legality of the nursery school.
Mayor Faram stated that the recent Planning and Zoning meet-
ing Mrs. Williams was referring to that Councilman Davis
indicated he would get a legal opinion. Mayor Faram asked
Councilman Davis to address the subject.
Councilman Davis stated the Specific Use was discussed at
the Planning and Zoning meeting and there was a question
from the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Commission
and some of the residents in the area as to whether or
not the variance was a Specific Use permit, did it go
with the land or the owner. Councilman Davis stated the
City Attorney felt that it could possibly go with the
land because of the broadness of the minutes on the meet-
ing where it was granted. Councilman Davis stated the
City Attorney also felt it would be very hard to defend in
Court. Councilman Davis stated the recourse the people in
the area could take would be to get a new petition and
petition the City Council to abate the nuisance.
November 8, 1982
Page Twelve
e
e
( ~
e
November 8, 1982
Page Thirteen
Mayor Faram stated he thought the original request from
Mrs. Haley went before the Board of Adjustment.
Councilman Davis stated it went before the Board of
Adjustment in 1965.
Mayor Faram stated the Council had no appellate jurisdic-
tion over the Board of Adjustment and if the problem was
to be resolved, Mr. McEntire had outlined the method.
Councilman Fisher asked Mrs. Williams if she knew if the
neighbors were disturbed by the traffic or because of
what was going on in the structure.
Mrs. Williams stated mainly because of the traffic.
Mrs. Williams stated that even when the garage was
taken in the house could not be over 1,700 square feet
and the people were licensed to keep 50 to 100 children.
14.
Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of November 8, 1982.
ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
.
.
.
J: RAMSE(
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
November 8, 1982
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-901, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
SMITHFIELD ACRES SANITARY SEWER PROBLEM
In accordance with instructions from Councilman Jim Ramsey, we have studied
the referenced problem and offer the following comments:
1. The existing 6-;nch sewer main located behind Lots 1 through 2,
B1Qck 2, of the Smithfield Acres Addition, which serves these lots
is, according to the Utility Department personnel, free of blockage
and is functioning properly.
2. The natural ground elevation over the 6-inch sewer main along the
back of Lots 1 through 8 is higher than most of the house foundation
elevationswhich are in the sewage back-up problem area. Although we
understand that the sewer main is relatively deept the sewer service
lines may be shallow and on a flat or adverse grade~ Service lines
laid on a flat grade will not flush properly and thus will become
clogged frequently.
3. Sluggish sewer service lines laid on a flat grade will cause back-up
in toilets, shower, bath and sink drains when wastewater is discharged'
from the house. Cleaning the sewer service line will generally
relieve these symptoms.
4. Sudden sewage back-up experienced in toilets, showers and baths
when no wastewater is being discharge from~·the house indicates
surcharging of the main is occuring caused by more wastewater being
forced into the sewer main upstream or downstream from the problem
area than the line has capacity to carry. Such excess wastewater.
will discharge at the lowest relief point of the sewerage system located
in the surcharged area. This low drainage area appears to be through
the toilets and shower drains in the houses located on Lots 4, 5, and 6
on Smithfield Road.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG, · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
.
Page 2, Gene Riddle, November 8, 1982
, 5.
We would suggest that the surcharge problem could be eliminated
from some of the low lying houses-on Smithfield Road by transferring
their sewer services to the sewerage system located west of Smithfield
Road. Such transfer would require construction of a sewer main
extension from the existing main between Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, of the
Briarwood Estates, as shown on the attached sketch. Acquisition of
utility easements would be required from three lots for construction'
of this sewer main extension. We would estimate construction ·costs
to transfer service of Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 2, of the Smithfield
Acres addition to the Briarwood main to total about $7,500.00.
.
aØJ/J
cc:
Mr.· Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
.
r
t·
i
~'I . I' j //
, L 1 11 ~
¡ . LLL L ,-=:¡=: ~
~.¡r~~ry~~'~T.rT'~J \d'~¡~ U~~'-
.,''1 ,\ - I
~.;i " e., i=iì=T- ,-
~, t,' .rf' o--~~
~.~rTTr1 'TrT, ' ¡.... .~
Ii I I ! ¡ ¡ ; ¡ . k:J ~
~ I : L .)::~ , ....~.. --c
~ '!1~~;f.·~:.~~ '. .~ '. -
..__ ~______, .._ ....__.....,... _ t: ...L.lF:~~~~~j .,-l~::n: ~, §
..I .'\1;,. W_ ....... ~t~·~·jìí: . ' :~EEll(LF
I ¡ ("\ltJ~.~ _ UJí ~ _ ._1ft!. \ I \ 1 ì 1= tJ ~~~!I
I ~ t.,*,) ::, ¡ I. r- , 0:!'1': " '-1!
~ to.' II' ~, ~ i:¡:: ~~+:. .. : 6 ': T ,.;u .lJ..!'\ ~ #~
. ~~~ I, T . ~~ 16:: . µ'µ+.J.[,4-4-U ~i~~ ~
'~,',' ~ØJ]~-;~'I' 0 f-H bJ~~--'... ..... ': IllIlilliru ¡Blj-// ¡::.J:~"j6~"
" ~~ k'I~!J:tllitli: , r II' ff' 6~ W:-~t1""'" : --f<. .,!;' ~ -I, =1=1
lilll"'~ Y~'~""I .c1~ II '...ii/ill........... ~, ~~
'._j~~~ ~~'~;±V1' 1" ' ;~r:I ;t'~_;~.'j·:-_·I*·~_:-E..=:~Wi.:''''~ " . B.~ ,--,:.~ ~ ..._.i )', '^', · "r
,~'1 ~.t.~ ~ -- _,"', r r ~. It V t '\1'i ,," #=±:' ì!.! -.." ~1 ~, ..¡ 9-\ dC ~ -' -
"lrJ¡!liIW~lttIi1fJ 1t~t8~ â§~ ~t" IIp , I~ $ "-f-....:c~ I~. I~~- 1=E,g ~(\;'>~ä~.~,... . :.' ,¡~ -.1",1, :.' ¡
~. .O:-~;:.=2-=~ l~,J:"idf¡'%'f r;q '~1Y.' ,>Ii~ ,Bh.,~.;-~i! . - I,~.~ if: \ "'~::iL .. Ir~~~::: .:t.".'~' 'I ~~h;·~,-J
;;., ~t;::Þ ~ S:: §ffiffi¡:¡:~~' ~LI,;' it ".1.' ,,\:. ,\ i- \-W~¡Jf+6' ~~~ff'~¡'1.1f+ ¡ ~ ~........' ::::~-' r-;~ .:/-)--=- "-,....// " ' I- I' !..~, i·~!'·IW'~1 ¡ l~l...:....r-_
<¡., ..O'~, F It::::= 3:. .. . '12' .lliWilBl '~ c~· U-Ü 6, _ ,& ~ "'¡:Ul. ¡¡¡ - " -,- -,'.' - . J : ,..J - ~
I,_.:?~ ~~. ~,~rt 1tffi \ . ~~!llil ~~~\f.fB&lli1 ~ ..~ - S- I -' tJp.,-'" A/!.'é ~ ¡:~ ..'~ ~' ~. ~:;,y , .:. ~ ·
_ ~~I~¡'!':~~_~. mtfj,2_ 1:~J~'I1t:.1' ~h~~l.!i~' ~~ '-,¡~~\,::m.r _ ~ ~i'~~;;1q.;; ~ P/<Ø8I.Ehf A~A 1\ 'W:~_ ; ::-:¥.t 6: : ' .~.. ¡!! ¡~rkJ,.¡¡i~:~~.:.),.~
:1..r:.. , "'" 1:111;= . 12 1.!!!!.!Jlj. Jl f \ . ' "LL "-I '" ~.::t. .Ii":i I ~,'-'-'. ..
....I~¡_ ~ ' ~\~I~::i.,-",,"",.- IlL, ..lllLJ R~6'1il :-II.' ;;m~' .:-\ .¡', \1"1'~~' - ~:-~, ,~:: ~ .111 ..J _' 'I 1111J1
r. "' R ....~~.D!.:., _õlfH I ~.w. t h'1ir1 ,., .)¡ ~ .- I I'. l.~.;, ~I' ~-): " ...j ~ ---." '.,;': J
.:!:._ :. ; , "'_' , , . . . ~~ ~ .2- bï-\,.f I~~' J..U ~ \ -'. ,', :n1;#= ~'" '"- ~ ~
.. _ ~ I~ ~ a ... ....;,'J]jE'tëf,"iC:- '" ~- =1'- .:. t::' ~llii ii'
;.'1 1.1~~..--4- ~~'~:~" ~'.'~": '. ~~' ~ ,.. 10" J. .'t. ~-1:' ,. ~.\:: - -=6"1~;' -, ':/~
II. . v ~1~' >..: :: ~ o. \-"'" iJL!t+ /10"' · f '¿JlJji:~...: ~~ ~ ~ ::::!:: t r:t : g 1:=--"-
it,. !f,·¡...~,ym:::: 1 :;.~' ... I ~ "_I~- - 't 6"rl::lr" .
,... "':I?-r'~¡;~ --.- - ...., t."¡I)¢,.' ill
:k" ~.~,. on' -v.ïtü~ ., - I I _ ~,~::~~~ ~l~~~~~àlt,., L,;~n;\~,6j
~ª_ _ :J.Wr..,-~~ ~,~ - ~~:: Éi¥\:li ' EI'~f=1 .. ~ eJ{1r r7lTm"~ ~
:; ~ _ ,...... iII''1illll õ1 ;-:i '. · ~ '~..... ,1, . n' m· tJ';t / ~" 12'
[;¡;;. ª IB n (1' '~T:tl6iH!tJ d... I" I.' T 1 iJIIÌ' . l¡::"o\t+i":Z ªi1IiJ II i !: It, ¡l. i "'A if ; II ~II ì T iT! I "
~ ~ 1F""~~llll~+t~éL1~. !' :!:!.ill... ..,. ~ =1diillJO'i, 1 illY ÁI ¡IiJlill¡lii! HII " ~ ~
"". ~ 'UI ,;;J,;;) ß.. 12" ~~ :: · I . - bioi< ¡;L1illlilllillf / A4 \;-
il§ C~EEll( lí~~§.." =-'" !1.!.$!~.'" ~' (VI , Oz' "~~"8 .
71 !(l 12' ;" ~-f.~~~ ,"». ~ '.... - It ~ ~~ 1: ~ I .... -- þ~~t :
11 ' I I... . " 'i;. '>;,~' ... ~- Ii! ) ~ ~ ;~ 7'. ¡é" ~~ Irf
.V ~' .., ,12' 12. '.: ~ _. _ _ .. ----- ~ ::::: 'e:: ;// I.' J .. ,'"j' \:71.]
. -=.-r- '..,', ~ . ..... , ,-I". ~ ~ '. :]'" ,LW / ;(1 ....u.l1' llLf,I- CU-CII
J:.=:r,; I"E I:±: :;f- r-= ::;'~.J:': '",-""I ~, , 1.1:::1 t=;:t ,T Im'-¡ if hl(i:;~; ~'¡:r 'dll': . . ~ ;; ,~' ,/-//~' fj, 1 " , .~ 'I~' =il;:8
'EF.;'! _, ~ 't r ...::-", 'ff' ' ,~... ~ --J:-;a.o' --r:"~' :<€'- ' mTT'T'.ci!E'" e4fij'1
1'::' ".l -;;, ~ ~ ,~..:F-?:::: -;",:':.:: '~::, Id'¡=~ t::;:L!i J 1!.Ii 1 '1:' ìëÚ't ", ~. -LJ' ...,. ~ Iill:xY ... V 1:Jiw, ,¡hUili ' 12" ..'.8
~ .:!': . :''''7'-'¡ -:ç ,-,\IP-~,' ,^ n.., " " ' ,"'. ,,' 6"-+--11 /' - ~.'~' .- 1--' ::¡ ,
.. . ~"/'. " ~~..'.;:')., _. ,"';r.":;;;;:' ~ . ~ ~ --. - dL
.¡:: " ~ ~.... ~ '" >, '".~::;;' ,¿,tÅ, ~ ~3B' ,,' ¡,;r}ti¡"~'=~~ jj -- ,.. ,,// . fll f---- ·
,I' .1':'':;' -= 'J...,"0K..., 1l<';&,"1!5oç;t::7f.::..~ "'::' -¡ .,' ~.~...:... ,j I!'k" · >7 8 ï::rff'..¡;q -
~__ ~~.µjÊ~~~~(T ~~. .~,~~~~~..,......i~'~~! ...~ -;~UfA UIIIIT ç;¿~ i--I § rfll ., ~
~ b" '~{i.¡¡<~~~~ , ~.,.' ¡ , ~'- 'I::ti 'JJ1'â;'~i!:"./' '. ~ -'1::. ~. 3: i-Itt tit ' /~:/Ú:;; ~ ---; '--L I
~I >t .~~~Ih_.·~~~~Ull 'R,- ~:~~~t~.u! ~J'~+""i¥ bfJijITß14 <à>t'-v..~. "'~ i.:~,:.=-- ~. .:: 10' ?,~:J: ~Q: , . . Ie· ~
~~Ii a.. 15 \ ' $ )¡~~ - ~J.I, ï-+-1' 1 'I' tr~ ~~~r-~ ." ...,¿'" I J ..-
L.J 1 O~t::>::'~ ' " .. ,ì(ç~ 4i : ~J .-<1 ' .. - .... '" ,- V - ·
_ r- ~ þI('}':'.:!' -~ ' l' . 0 rt ,.' ,. .:-" ' . IO"...LL..:"I -¡, , . 1:?!a!J:;; 1 I" J' ,.~ '"- .'.' ø- I
~.~ j~"1'~~:: '~~ ! //-'0' .~..~~~' Iff ,.~þ~ '~I~~,~JS~ ... ~-
I, ":~'~" ~~::'~.\I '_'~'Ii"'~~'"'" 4~:£1ihT'" i~~
, "". _K: ;":(.,i~~~.'i ' .'~ /~ ~ '~i~:Ý 10 ..." ,~ .;:j¡ liD::' [D,:¡I'\y 10'
. ~ . .....d-',l,x. ~ ,~ r ,/ ~ .2:,,"'1- 1 '0
..' ,v ¡þ~~"'~" "'.~ ,,~~",~ t ,/ ,\ ,."...f ~"'>J I V ..'
~ :~~' :l1 ".~ ,0Jb'~' 21' ~ ' .' W W AIL ~1
~I~_,~,.r;; ".~~~;;~illJ(,<:-"¿ W-~ CIH! - ,,-lj::t"~d'4' , ~>. .~~ I n oc.E~ IB~Al-;:1H!
r!' . J~ ~ /~'~~i;.'~" .,... 7·/ ~~~o uN I ~ .~r~/~tioi**i~,L~~~':\·~~, .' \' . u· I rll---;.----~,..6C:-_;.:1,
'::'~ .... c< 1'.' , ' ~.' '-';..LH" ' f' "-;: ,";'" "..,':'. 11 ......
.' rCI~.;:¡p,... " , ~~'Ê -. \ ~ .,':.... ~!j;JffJJh'fi:r:f1,'At'\\.~ lJ i .t,~6. \~¡ '.:: 10·
J Rt!¡·,;;:rr.u:JL~jr,¡ J 6'b,?, " , ' . ~, ~~. '. ,'" ~ · , "çd ß:~!J'\+4~1'<¡~Y,;I" , I :16" , ft:'. -. ¡ -~ F::lOw
... ~ ~~_~" " IZ, -,.,,,-m Jl~:2QJ]lj¡f' gp:J \ 4" ~\ i"':.:l . :~""'JJJ).ki/'" .....,~ I :=,="--:jj' · ~-Þ
r y - .. ~~~~~;:~ Þ3 '~.. ~2.ill_~ ~~j~~ ~:¡"'f~j :,-'" :-' - k !' "'N;,t ¡: :t:-;." ~- I ¡ ~.
, , -1:f'=::J ~';~:¡¡~~~ " N...; :1>':.:".1...: >.... ~.Y._.~:\~ ~-.1 . +- ".,. j-=j ?t o(..c~·~lld±J'-r:...·.j":':-k'l~l.=·. .--. .: - IS·
, ' .,,":t-¡.., , ~........ -J' · c:L ' · ' " . " _..~. ,ç.o,,~, _.. .. , '. ' ,
U' 11· ~-Hl.,. ~~ ~u: ~'::1. ~.'~' ~ ..\ ..... .. 'í------L~'1·,d..¡..;... ..e..4-;.~~~...·...:. I.¡...·· =-1
~ ¡ ~ ~ ~.~¿-J(~:: .:}~ ~'" ~_ ' · '.'\ '~\~' <-"ìl/';=;?-" '''',,;.y'' , t r " .: :1G..',k:_I!:dJ!.¿: III
~ I ($' 11 ~. ~ ~~.: ~j.. ~ ", ~.~~ :~~ --:t,' ~~ñv~~ ~: -::::.:--j ~}.:." e : .L v' L11,.~ ; !...,:m.· : i~~.· ~.,";J ,¡'H"¡4.L..~. j
I I i~ c ._' t::j:::.i: . ,11".' ~~ '- ~ ..' ,..J,"" ~, ,xt¡ - <; /' ". ¡' "'-' . ,,' I ....,'-<'--'-'..... ~
e- ...,.. ,', ~ ".-:Þf-::¡ 6' "'"-7~' .' "-.."\',' Iff .'&' " . <~ '¡:-'" ;:<9. y t ....."l¡ ""- ";-'"-' ~ q-~ lli
_ ''''__'.. '. //,--~,.'-c..<êõl.::~\%~i ! ~~,~",:::·:¡'::f~~. "':j~~;.j~~':-=p:'¿:-~_.- ,j
. C\ ._'. -~-{J-1~'.ì~'~'''~y.µ-Y-t \.~~ I-.J¡-~\ \">1(:!:.,(.:·t'L(j~~_H___- ~..~\~lJ~A:.rJ,t~, -j"'~YUS.=:d.Þ
, :':' . ~;. . . r '. " . . . c.: /. ' 1-"- ..-~ ;.- '·.f;::: 1 : ~. _. ~,}¡~~~ ~J' =1'j
-II
. 'II
II
I
I
I
~
[
.
~r--
i
I
10-
e
~Þ'. .
"J
-----
.._-~_.._. .....-.--------
~^d AlZ
<.0
::r
\
'9~
~
"
~~~
~\l
q:~
~--J
~~
0)
U")
C'?
....-
~
"
~----
---- -
...-
----
----- ----
x='
"".
~
~
~
"i
~
\(
"
~.
~
u
:>
0..
, V\
~{
"
~Cl
~V\
,
~-
N
S'~ 11" ..,/
~---- ----
~
~
~N
~
""
"'
l'
,~
~~
~~
~~
~
~C'?
~
"
<
"
~ ....
~'-'
"
~~
\U
\1\
l\: ~
C)
~
~
~
~~
.... ~.
~
......
f'
.,9
ltJ
~ ~
~ ''-I
~
\I) . .
~--J\I)
~ .
~ a ~
~\J\~
~N~
o
u
N
- ----
I
I
l....
r-------, ....
.... '
.... ......
, ....
.... ....
...... "
...... ....
....
M
o
::r
("f')
L.{)
N
----------
I
iõ
('Y')
<.0
-.
,.9
Z
<!
:L
W
Z
o
Z
N
(Y)
:::r
CD
N
N
N
o
N
.--
....----
- - --- -- - --
----- ----- ----- -~
N
M
tf3l 3>f
I
I
I
I
<I
I
I
I
I
t
J
--_...1
I
t
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
o
\\
,~
<,'
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ 'J
~ '" '"
~ ~ ~
" ~ ~
\t} ~ "
lJJ \J '-oJ
~
"
\b
\)
~ l' '"
l' T"' ~
l"- \I} ~
h: ~ lb
~\r¡
~
...
8
"-
-
.... t r
Z-"'-
. .
\.U
....
~
V)
City of ~orth ~ichland WI1s
~tar of the ~etroplex
November 5, 1982
PUBLIC NOTICE
THE FOLLOWING ITEM WAS ADDED TO THE NOVEMBER 8, 1982,
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA.
.
13. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 82-40, Request of
TLB-GSC Enterprises, Incorporated, for
Replat of Lots 2R-6, Revised to Lots lR-4R,
Block B, College Hills Addition.
(Located on the northside of Bogart at Holiday Lane)
r-<=///~~
/jeanette Moore - ity Secretary
(.,
e
(817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. lOOP 820/ P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
.
. .
. ..' . .
. .
.
Star of the ~etroplex
QIertifitate of ~erÍ1ite
THE STATE OF TEXAS
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
TO:
DOROTHY McKNIGHT
IN RECOGNITION OF
'P.Ti!N
YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE
TO THE CITY IN THE
LIBRARY
DEP ARTMENT.
DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS R-th·
DAY OF
NOVEMBER8 1982
Mayor
City Manager
Department Head
. . ,'. .....
. .
IT
I ñ
\ f/
'-..,t'
.
. ·<'{1%it¡L~:.>. ; .
WI!·~V.~~;:::;:\·<::·:: .'. eity of ~oJ:th ~ichland Hïñ;:":··::·.::?\~2{!~~~~~
. .
. . .
. .
. .
.
~t:tr of the ~etroplex
. .. "1 _410.~", . ,
.. OIertifitate 'of ~erbite
THE STATE OF TEXAS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '
TO:
MARILYN ELLIS
IN RECOGNITION OF .. ·<~,<:,,"'.rrF:N
YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE
TO THE CITY IN THE
LIBRARY-
DEPARTMENT. '
DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS 8th
DAY OF
N OT/1i!MR RR" 1982
Mayor
City Manager
. . .
Department Head
'~
Dr' ..,.
j I.
\
November 4, 1982
('
SUBJECT: PI 82-24 Appeal hearing on Zoning Request from COllJJ1ercîal-Specific Use-Parking Lot
. to Commercial on Lot 6, Block 23, Clearview Addition.
DEPARTMENT: Pla~ning .& Zoning
BACKGROU~~: This property is located on Maplewood Drive ànd is bounded on the southeast
hy Ryrn Automotive.
Mr. Byrd received a Commercial~Specific Use-Parking "Lot zoning and then he installed a
. . . .
.~draul;·c lift on this property to service and wash cars. Mr..·,Byr.d· ~/as told· to stop the use
of the lift.' Mr. Byrd is now requesting the Commer~ial-Spec,;fic·.Use-ParKil1g.Lot be changed
_tuust "Commercial" zoning.
_lb~_J:.lann;rJg anº-I~ni~_mmission denied this .request on September 23, 1982.
e·----
.. ~..... "
-...-. - - -----..--..-.~- ....
CITY ~OIJNCIL ACTIOI~ REQUIRED: --Æ2Qr_pval or denial of zoning r~quest.
ßlJDGE'fED IT}t~1:
YES
NO X
.J-\CCQU"t-lT 1TU11BER: -NLA
---------------------------------------------------------~~--~~--------
.
Page 14
p & Z Minutes
September 23, 1982
.
12.
PZ 82-24
-.
.
~.-
\,,'
Request of Claude Byrd to rezone Lot 6,
Block 23, Clearview Addition, from its
present classification of Commercial-, .
Specific Use-Parking. Lot to a proposed
classification of Commercial.'
This property is located on Maplewood
Drive and is bounded on the Southeast
by Byrd Automotive.
Claude Byrd came forward. He said they
have been in. business for 23 years and
previ~usly.in Richland Hills.
Mr. Byrq said they are requesting their
zoning be changed from Commerc;al-
Specific Use-Parking to Commerc;al~ He
said last year they were granted the
Commercial-Specific Use-Parking and they
still need it, because that is the primary
use of this property.
Mr. Byrd showed some pictures taken prior
to purchasing' this property and some made
after their purchase of the property. He
said they had not lowered the property
va" ue, instead they have increased ; t by
cleaning it up and keeping it neat.
Mr. Byrd said they primarily use the
property for parking their customer's cars
and their rental cars.
-..
Mr. Byrd said sometime back, they took out
a permit and, poured some concrete adjoining
their shop, which ;s about 10 feet behind
their shop; there was also an existing
piece of concrete there. He said with the
bad weather~ they poured enough to park
about 12 cars on the back, there. He said
since then, they have finished the lot out
with crushed stone.
Mr. Byrd said a few months ago, he purchased
and installed a hydrolic lift to be able to
service their cars without realizing he
would be in violation of the City Ordinance.
He said he has a $5,000 lift setting there
not being used. Mr. Byrd said he could
move the lift to the other end, which would
be on the old property, but it would cost
approximately $10,000 to move it.
.
r.
e
. .
Page 15
P & Z Minutes
September 23, 1982
Mr-. Byrd said that is why he is here, he
is requesting this specific area, 19 ft.
by 25 ft., where they wash and service
cars, be changed to Commercial. He said
there would not' be any noise created by
this, and their hours are 7:30 P. M. to
5:30 P. M. Monday through Friday.
Mr. Byrd said they previously requested
Comme~cial zoning, but was turned down,
and received the Specific Use zoning.
Mr. Wood asked if he was .just asking for
the 19"x 25' section to be zoned Commercial.
Mr. Byrd said no, he wanted the whole lot
zoned Commercial, it would be less confusing, '.
but he says he does not plan to put a shop
on the lot,.
Mr. Tucker said with Commercial zoning, you
could put one there if you' wanted to.
Mr. Hannon asked if it would be adequate
for Mr. Byrd's needs to just zone that small
portion.
Mr. Byrd said it would. He said they
previously had to flush radiators out in
the street, so they put water back there
and the concrete so 'they could get out of
the street to do their work.
Mr. Hannon asked if the house next door was
a residence.
Mr. Byrd said as far as he knew, it was.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor
of this request to please come forward.
Myrtis Byrd came forward. She said when
they first requested the Commercial zoning,
she had no idea they would have a problem
in getting the zoning. She said she is very
proud of this city and they would never do
anything to make the city look unsitely.
Ms. Byrd said in 1971, they bought 2 lots
so they would not have to park on the street.
Page 16
P & Z Minutes
September 23, 1982
,/'
(
-e
Ms. Byrd said the gate they now have on
Maplewood is very seldom open.
Ms. Byrd said they are asking for Commercial
and she ·thinks it should be Corrunercial. She
said there ;s residential property in the
neighborhood that has been used as å business
for 4 years, she was not sure what kind of
business, but cars from out of state are
there all night. Ms. Byrd said there was
another house in the neighborhood where they
work on cars.
Mr. Riddle said the city 'had never been able
to prove that.
Ms. Byrd said another house in the neighbor-
hood has room and boarders and gets money
for it.
~.
Ms. Byrd said they have always obeyed the
law and feel they have been treated bad.
She said she spot-checked the neighbors
before they purchased the lot and they had
objections, so she told her son it would be
okay to purchase the lot.
Bill Howe, 5109 Colorado, came forward. He
said he had lived here 23 years and feels
thi's request is no real encroachment into
the residential area. He said he feels the
improvements the Byrds have made are
beneficial to the neighborhood. He said he
would like to add his support to the Byrds
in improving that area.
The Chairman called for those wishing to
speak in opposition to this request to
please come forward.
.
Kenneth Fickle, 7908 Maplewood, came forward.
He said he lives 2 houses down from this
property. Mr. Fickle said the many wrongs
of running businesses in residential does
not make it right to put another business in
right down the street, it just means we need
to get the others closed down. Mr. Fickle
said there is a business operating next door
to Byrd Automotive, it is a company which does
typing and filing for a doctor·s office. He
said he did not know which doctor.
Page 17
p & Z Minutes
September 23t 1982
.
-.
.
(.
//'-
(
-.....
Mr. Fickle asked if any of the pictures
that Mr. Byrd showed the Commission shpwed
the lift sticking up above the fencet.and
with a car on it, it··sticks way above the
fence.' He said it was very much an eyesore.
Mr. Fickle said he and some of the neighbors
spoke against this in December of 1981 in
which they and the City Council were told
by the Byrds that they intended to do nothing
but have a parking lot. He said at that
time the request was denied and then he was
called and came down to the Byrdls and was
shown what they wanted, and was told all they
wanted was a parking lot. Mr. Fickle said
he would agree to'that and he would help them.
He said he told them they should ask for
Specific Use zoning for parking only. Mr.
Fickle said the Byrds requested the Specific
Use ·and was granted it. He said he did not
oppose it, he did not even come to the
meeting. . .-
, .
Mr. Fickle said shortly after that, they
put out a sign announcing their car rental
business; soon after that, they opened a
car wash or grease rack. Mr. Fickle said he
called Ms. Calvert and she put him in touch
with one of the City Inspectors who came
down and told the Byrds they could not use
that lift and if they did use it, they
would be fined. He said the Inspector said
it was against the ordinance to put the lift
in, and they also put it in without obtaining
a building permit. Mr. Fickle said if the
lift cost the Byrds $5,000 and it is going to
cost $10,000 to have it moved, if it was him,
he would just buy another lift, it would be
$5,000 cheaper.
Mr. Fickle said he remembers the lot next
door and the trouble they had with ,it. He
said it has a huge slab in the back yard,
which i's the remains of a huge building
that was built by a construction company
under a Specific Use-Parking lot permit.
He said they had no permission to build the
buildi'ng; they were told to tea~ the build-
ing down; the Company went out of business
and the building stood there for 4 years,
but they finally got the building torn down
. ..' r
Page 18
p & Z Minutes
September 23, 1982
I
( ;.
'\.
'.
PZ 82-24
DENIED
c·
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
13. CONSIDERATION OF SHORT FORM
PLATTING ORDINANCE
.
í'
t
and the zoning back to residential. Mr.
Fickle said the neighbors are trying to
not allow this to happen again. He said
if a p~rking lot is what they. wanted, why
not keep it Speëific Use. Mr. Fickle
said if it goes Commercial, they can put
any business they want to there.
Mr. Fickle said he and the neighbors
request the Commission deny this request
and make them move whats been put there
unlawfully.
The Chairman closed the 'Øublic Hearing.
Mr. Bowen made a motion to deny
PZ 82-24.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon
and the motion carried 4-0.
The Chairman stated the request was denied.
Mr. Byrd said he requested a rebuttaJ" but
was denied this.
Mr. Tucker said he did not know he wanted
to speak. He said Mr. Byrd could appeal
thts request to the City Council.
There was a disturbance by Mr. Byrd.
The Chairman called for order.
The Chairman called a recess at 9:25 P. M.
The Chairman called the meeting back to
order at 9:35 P. M. with the same members
present.
The Chairman asked if
this Ordinance.
All
ordinance were discussed.
Mr. Hannon asked about the cut off date
in i tern #2.
Mr. Riddle said that since that date, the
city had better control over the property
i n the ci ty .
NCENCROAC~H"'" EN C T H ~~R rH~·'I..i· 5HG I/v!..~
.6..
L.. E G EN D ...., :.~.,. ;j;.9F..;,.,~.., ~...... _'. ..
. ~ . .¡.~.~",'
e ~ RC" r'~: f'<t ,.......' tt..t..~,:., 'Þ.. .'
... of, " ,. '." . .'., .~'" . ....
o f Rt) NO.; ¡:. 1-;:' . ,";: ì" . 'N I\.~" ~¡,~¡..' ·
A eo t 5 D' :"; T .., K f.~ ~. · . ...~ ... . ~ · , , A,' , , . . . . . ". .., .
..0 "'(".'t-.,,,.::>. :; "'-~. i.' ...'\.., ...0.'.... :..... ,~~ . ,.... f
-.' '-.~. (~ . , ;._'V, \.oj !'~ .. 9'~.., . ,. " '0-"",
. -X-)c:- F~·..NC.E ......,.·/~...~t~(.~~'.·ý...:.
-" - "-r':"'~Ei: R u ~<f::: .4' ..... .;.-;;.,
......T -r...;~~· ;...·m~~H 0 J"~ t:.; L { ~'" E
.
.~
'~
,..~
~
~
~
''S
~
.
'N
SCAlf: f';..y" ~ '
'"
z"
-., . .';:Z.-;?
~.--:.-:.....~
" ,¡ .'~.p;; <~-- _
ðn·~.Jt( . .---~
1 ~ ......~-;S..- '.' e:::::>-Ú
-ø <. .>-
c9~ .,.. '.
~'..... ··I..r..;>-
"
<:::J~~~~
('-'., \
. .' C;;~ \
- '-" J
.....- /
/
A
)\ tP'
/ v
/ ,,~
.,l~f
/)., ,0
/
./
~~
ø~.....
.~
~~ '.
~~~.~\
." ./~:,..
¢'
.~~
~\f.t
\~
"t
C,
~
/
/'.
I
l
<ð ,?- .' li '-,'
~.' ,;;;- 1'. ~~ ,Ð'
~ c.?Cf_ . /J'-' 'PI
<?~A/.
./
Ji
¡
/
I
I
,~~
.{v \
IJ
fP
PLAT 01'
;LOT 6, BLOCK 23, CLEAR VIEW ADDITION' .
3RD PILING. TO THE CITY OF NOR'fH
RICHLANDHILLS_ 1'ARRANTCOUIITY, TEXAS,
ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUKE
388--25. PAGE' 100, PLAT RECORDS, TURAHT
COUNTY,· TEXAS '.
"'';1::-.....- :--:t\
'-1~'
~f' t\ \
.¡ i l \,
lj\~
. LOYD BRAN$O~v1,$URVEYORS tN€;.
R E (-; 1ST E.R t: f) P tJ 8 t fC $ U R V E '(OR .
102 8t'.J·OR T'H SY l \/AN·lA·,Ai\lE..
. Fl. VtiCIRlH;, T E X AS, 76fl t
a.3,~ - 347'7
81~1505
, . 6, c· I.') , Rq. '.£ cr. A~~.$ .....'...;..:......B... ;...'''. ..'.. E.G...,r.,:!.. '.'...... '1"..... H.' ~..-......G.........$;if..... '.'.......'....'.ON.... .". ,0. ,..:.......
. .~~~.-:~~":';'''> ~
. ,0_ f-L.ï·· . '-X>;1'1, 81'f4NroM
C)A 7~' J - r'
~ r..X';.' HE. q.Ë: a v (f::.f?';, F"~ T,.. A'r
'!~A~\ !<~ 'T'RU E
.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PR Y IN.ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGE AND AMENDMENTS, .
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE
. OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
PASSED. APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
'AND ZONING COMMISSION' AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HIllS, NOVEMBER 13,
1967, AS' AMENDED JANUARY 27~ 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECoMMENDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY' OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: . .
2:
RESOLVED that òn Case No. PZ ,82-24 th.~ followi~ng descri'bed property shal1,
rezòned from Commerc;al-Srieclfjc' ·Üse":.pa·r~i'ng· Lot' . . .;. . to
Corrmerc i a 1 . . . . , '. ..........,...,."..'......
BEING Lot 6, Block 23, Clearv;ew Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, .
. Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-25, Page 100, Plat Records,
Tarrant County, Texas.
This property is located on Maplewood Drive and ;s bounded on the southeast
by Byrd Automotive.
.
DENTFD BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd
September ,1982.
DA Y OF .
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT 'ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH 'RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE #PZ 82-24
IS HEREBY REZONED
THIS DAY OF ,1982.
MAYOR DICK FARAM
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETAR'Y JEANETTE MOORE
tit APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
CITY ATTORNEY REX McENTIRE
.
.
.
City of ~orth 1Uchland 1Iills
Star of the ~etroplex
Rodger Line
Ci ty Manager
FROM: Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
TO:
DATE: November 4, 1982
SUBJECT: ·Platting & Zoning Cases for City Council Nov. 8, 1982
PS 82-44 Request of Cross Roads Dev. Co. for
APPROVED final plat of Lots 1-5, Block 10, ,
Snow Heights North Addition.
PS 82-45 Request of Dyna-Co Development Co.
APPROVED for final plat of Lot 2, Block 6,
Snow Heights North Addition.
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. Q, BOX 18609 / NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118
·DATE: November 4, 1982·
. .
tl
- .,
SUBJECT: PS 82-44 Final Plat of Lots 1-5;.Block 10, Snow Heights Ñorth Addi~ion
--
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This property is located on the east side oLRufe Sn'ow'Drive and nørth
of the prûposed Meadow. Crest Drive.
. .
; The owner agreed to all the Engineer'$ commen~s. Del~ért Stembriqge, the,developer's,
, Engineer, confirmed by telephone conversation on Nov. 4th that ,~he develop_er win extend
, the storm drain at this time, as recommended in item #7 of the Engineer's 1etter dated
, Dc tober- 11, 1982.
The Planning and Zoning Comm'ission recommended approval of this final plat subject..to the'"
Engineer's comments a"nd' subjèct to resizing the'storm drain on the west side of Reynolds "
. Road at the highschool.
. -... .- ~., ,
. .
CITY COUNCIL ~CTION IŒQUIRED:
. .
Approval or denial of final plaf.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
_-------------------------~--- . ~ . 1_ . ~~
---------------------------------~----------------
.
.
Page (" /
I
,. (
P & Z Mi.nute~ ': ,
October 21, 1982
. 6. PS 82-44 Request of Cros~ Roads Dev. Co. for
final plat of Lots 1-5, Block 10,
Snow Heights North Addition.
John Cook with ,Cross Roads Dev. Co.
came forward. ,He sa id they had
received the City Engineer's comments
and take no exception to ôny of them.
PS 82-44 Mr. Hannon made, a motion to approve
APPROVED PS 82-44 subject to the Engineer's
comments and,subject to resizing the
storm drain on the west side of
Reynolds Road at the highschool.
This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash
and the motion carried '5-0.
.,
Z. PS 82-45 Request of Dyna-Co Development Co.
final plat of Lot 2, Block 6, S
Heights North Addition.
John Cook came rd to represent
aid they have received
. the ngineer's comments and take
exception to them.
Mr. Hannon made a motion to approve
PS 82-45 subject to the Engineer's
comments.
This motion was seconded by Mr. ~lood
and the motion carried 5-0.
.
/'
(,~-
, ,
I
~.
.
Delbert R. Stembridge
consulting engineer
October 18, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland -Hills, Texas 76118
Re: City of North Rich1and Hills,
Snow Heights North Addition,
Lots 1-5, Blk. 10, and Lot 2,
Block 6, Final Plans, PS 82-
44,45.
We have received the engineering comments of Knowlton-English-Flowers
and we offer the following comments:
4IÞ Lots 1-5, Block 10
1. It is acceptable to the County Clerk to have the plat and the
dedication filed as separate documents. This is standard
procedure for the City of Ft. Worth.
2. The Developer intends to construct the entire streeet at this'
time. The street will extend from Rufe Snow to the Holiday
West Addition.
3. The Developer agrees to construct the underground drainage as
the area along the overland swale develops. Future develop-
ment will dictate the exact location of the future underground
drainage. The Developer agrees to accept the responsibility
of maintenance of the swale until the future underground system
is constructed.
e
4. Lone Star Gas Company will be notified regarding errosion control
over their gas line. The Developer has already paid Lone Star
for the rerouting of the gas line into Rufe Snow Drive.
5. As noted, a manhole will be constructed at the location requested.
6. The inlet lead will be laid beneath the pavement at the time of
street construction to avoid any saw cutting of the street in
3729 Flory. North Rlchland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-136~
7
, '
,
.
.
.
~." ..
·Snow Heights Nort~'
PS 82-44,45. 1
7 .
the future. There is no objection to building an open-
back inlet if the Public Works Department prefers.
The Developer desires to delay construction of the 558 addi-
tional feet of storm drain until the area south.of the TESCO
R.O.W. begins to develop. Pending land sales may require
rerouting of the main large line. The anticipated new routing
would be southwest, parallel to the TESCO R.O.W. with smaller
lateral lines extending south to intercept runoff in the low
areas. The exact location of these laterals has not been
determined at this time.
Lot 2, Block 6
1. The Developer ,agrees to pay his pro rata share of the storm
drain in the amount of $1,614.92.
2. The building line along Meadow Crest will be changed from 15 feet·
. to 25 feet prior to filing the plat for record.
If there are any questions regarding this plat, please do not hesitate
to call.
Sincerely,
. E .
DRS/et
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
~
. ~
.
.
.
~',
\<
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
October 11, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
SNOW HEIGHTS N. ADDITION,
LOTS 1-5, BK. 10, AND LOT 2, BK. 6,
FINAL PLANS, PS 82-44,45
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 10, (PS 82-44)
1. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication for this plat has
been ·submitted on separate legal size documents and attached
to the plat. We would suggest that the County Clerk be
contacted to determine if this procedure is acceptable for
filing the plat to record.
2. Since this plat. includes dedication of 1109.25 feet of
Meadowcrest Drive east of Rufe Snow, we would suggest that
the developer be required to construct at least half of this
street to City standards to provide access to Lots 2 and 5
without crossing Lots 3 and 4. The remaining half should
also be constructed to provide proper drainage to the proposed
overland relief swale which will discharge northward across un-
platted property to the concrete channel north of Lewis Court.
3. As noted in comment no. 2 above, the Developer proposes to dis-
charge stormwater from Meadowcrest Drive into an open unlined
swale north of Meadowcrest Drive. Based on the topographic
information submitted by the Developer's Engineer and his
computed 5-year runoff discharge quantities, we would estimate
that approximately 700 feet of 36-inch storm drain pipe would be
required to provide adequate underground drainage to the channel
north of Lewis Court. We would strongly recommend that such
underground storm drain be required when the area along the
proposed overland swale develops. Meanwhile, we would suggest
that the Developer be required to accept responsibility for
maintaintenance of this swale until an underground storm drain
is constructed in an easement dedicated to the City.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
.
....
.
.
.
..
C'
(
\ '-.:
Page 2 -- October 11, 1982 -- Planning & Zoning Commission
4. Lone Star Gas Company should be consulted regarding
errosion control over their 4-inch gas line which crosses
under the proposed drainage swale.
5. We would suggest that the Developer be required to construct
a manhole at Station 13+56.41 on Line uA" rather than a clean-
out to facilitate future extensions.
6. We note that Sheet No. 6 of 22 shows a future 36-;nch RCP
under Meadowcrest Drive at the same general location as the
pro'posed valley gutter shown on Sheet No. 18 of 22, along
with future inlets on the north and south side of Meadowcrest
Drive at this location. We would suggest that the 36-inch RCP
be constructed under the proposed concrete valley gutter as
required for future extension, to avoid having to saw cut the
valley gutter later. Also the Public Works Department may
prefer an open back inlet on the north side of Meadowcrest
Drive rather than a curb opening and discharge flume.
7. As shown on Sheet No. 20 of 22, the Developer is proposing
to stub out a 7211 x 4411 CGM under Lewis Drive from the existing
storm drain along the TESCO easement which discharges downstream
across Holiday Line into the Calloway Branch Channel. The
Developer plans to plug the 72" X 4411 storm drain just south of
Lewis Drive and extend that drain another 558 feet when the
property south of Lewis Drive develops. We would encourage
the Developer to build all of this storm drain at once to
help alleviate flooding on Lola and Janetta resulting from
stormwater discharge across the High School property. The
Council may wish to consider participation in construction of
the line south of Lewis Drive with such participation costs
recovered later when the property south of Lewis Drive develops.
- -.. -_._---- .~..--.. .--.. - .~_. - --------- ...--.- ---.--
u have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please
esitate to call.
, aut~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA:mh
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
,
DATE: November 4, .1982 } ("
SUBJECT:. . PS 82-45 Final Plat of Lot 2, Block 6, Snow Heights North Addition
·
DEPAR11'1ENT: Planni ng and Zon; ng .
BACKGROUND: This property is located on the north side of Lewis Drive and is approximately
200 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive.
~ The developer has aqreed to all the Engineer's comments.
The P]a,noing and ZoninQ Commission recommended approval of this f.inal plat ~ubject to the
Engineer's comments.
·
-" ..---------------..~-_.--
.. ....._ ._._·,Þ4__........-..._·.~_·__~__·
CITY' COUNCIL I\C~ION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of this final plat.
_._..,,--~.
NO_-L_
BfTùGETED ITE11:
YES
~CCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
.--. -----------------------------------------------------------~~-~~----
·
II'
Page ( (
(
P & Z Mi.nu.te~
October 21, 1982
. 6. PS 82-44 Request of Cros~ Roads Dev. Co.
final plat of Lots 1-5, Block
Snow Heights 'North Additi
John Cook with Roads Dev. Co.
came forwar _ e said they had
e City Enginéer's comments
e no exception to ôny of the~.
PS 82-44 Mr. Hannon made· a motion to approve
APPROV ED PS 82-44 subject to the Engineer's
comments and-subject to resizing the
storm drain on the west side of
Reynolds Road at the highschool.
This motion was seconde9 by Ms. Nash
and the motion carried 5-0.
. Z · PS 82-45 Request of Dyna-Co Development Co. for
final plat of Lot 2, Block 6, Snow
Heights North Addition.
John Cook came forward to represent
Dyna-Co. He said they have received
. the City Engineer's comments and take
no exception to them.
PS 82-45 Mr. Hannon made a motion to approve
APPROV ED PS 82-45 subject to the Engineer's
comments.
This motion was seconded by Mr. ~/ood
and the motion carried 5-0.
.
...
I
I.
.
e
c
(
Delbert R. Stembridge
consultIng eno)~r
October 18, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland ·Hills, Texas 76118
Re: City of North Richland Hills,
Snow Heights North Addition, ~
_ :... _~- =--:--:- - -,":- .~. :;.. -_ ~ ,:::' Lo t 2,
Block 6, Final Plans, PS 82-
··~>..,45 .
_. _ _ _..____...... _ _ w__.._.._----·---·..-.. - .- --. -....
Lot 2, Block 6
1. The Developer .agrees to pay his pro rata share of the storm
drain in the amount of $1,614.92.
2. The building line along Meadow Crest will be changed from 15 feet
to 25 feet prior to filing the plat for record.
If there are any questions regarding this plat, please do not hesitate
to call.
, Sincerely,
DRS / et·
. E .
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Lirie, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
.
.
.
~
..¡.
31
~
("
'k
(~
~ .
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
October 11, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-929t CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
SNOW HE! GHTS N. ADDITION, ."
- .~~-~- ~~-'.~·'·LOT 2. BK. 6,
'- - '7. ,
FiNAL PLÄNS, PS 82-~-¡,45
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer.~.the
..... . ....
fo 11 owi ng comments: _ __ _ _h _ ___ _ _____ __ _ _ .__ ____ ___________ _
LOT 2, BLOCK 6, (PS 82-45)
1. We would remind you of our comment concerning storm sewer
pro rata in the total amount of $1,614.92 as noted in our
review letter, dated February 26, 1982. .
2. Since this property fronts on both Lewis Drive and Meadowcrest
Drive, a 25 ~ot buildirig set back should be provided on each
street.
- .
u have any questions c~ncerning the review of this subdivision, please
~S;;;;;¿~l ~ ~_
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA :mh
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
(
1'- (( (
f
,.
, '.
.
.
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENC INEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
February 26, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-929, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
LOT 2, BLOCK 6, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDN.,
·.PS 82-6, PRELIMINARY PLANS, (GRID 112)
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
. the fo 11 owi ng cOlllments:
1. Utility companies should be consulted regarding the possibility
of requiring additional easements not shown on this plat.
2. The Developer should be reuqired to pay his pro rata share of the
existing'storm sewer in Lewis Drive at the rate of $8.59, as
esta:lished in our letter of December 18, 1981, for a total length
of 188.0 feet.
-. .
3. Since this property fronts on Lewis Drive and will also front on
the future extension of Meadow 'Crest Drive, as shown on the plat,
we would suggest that tne proposed IS-foot building setback line
on Meadow Crest Drive be increased to 25 feet.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
plea~e do not hesitate to call.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstadt Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-62"· MET.RO/267-3367
! I
.
Date: November 4, 1982
SUBJECT: CONTRACT WITH HALTOM CITY FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO TRAILS ADDITION
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: The Trails Addition, which is located in Haltom City after being deannexed ~
by North Rich1and Hills and annexed by Haltom City, was improperly connected, by the
developer, Centennial Homes, Inc., to a sanitary sewer owned by the City of North Richland
Hills. The natural drainage flow in this area is such that it is logical that the property
be served by the North Richland Hills sewer. Negotiations between representatives of
North Richland Hills, Haltom city and centennial Homes, Inc., have resulted in a proposed
contract (copy attached) with the following provisions:
A. centennial Homes, Inc. will pay $30,000 for the right of Haltom City to
connect to the North Richland Hills sewer. This amount is slightly more
than double the Trails Addition's pro rata share of the projected cost
of an 18 inch parallel sewer that will be needed soon to serve the area,
based on ultimate development of 232 houses in the Trails Addition.
B. Haltom City will make provisions for installing and maintaining a metering
device at no cost to North Richland Hills, if metering of sewage is ever
required by th~ City of Fort Worth as a basis for determining cost allocation.
.
C. Haltom City will reimburse North Richland Hills for sewer service based on
the City of Fort Worth's charge for sewer service, plus 10 percent for
administrative and transportation costs.
D. Centennial Homes will furnish any easements that may be required from its
property for the future parallel 18 inch sewer at no cost to North Richland
Hills, and Haltom City will cooperate in obtaining any other easements that
may be required for the sewer.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: It is recommended that the attached proposed contract be
approved.
BUDGETED ITEM: Not Applicable.
ACCOUNT NUMBER: Not Applicable.
-
. ,
J J
.
CONTRACT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE BETWEEN THE CITIES OF
HALTOM CITY I TEXAS'
AND
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
THE STATE OF TEXAS 1
COUNTY OF TARRANT I
This CONTRACT AND AGREEMENT made and entered into this
day I
of
I 19____, by and between the City of Haltom City, a
municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas acting by and through
its duly authorized Mayor,
, and the City of North
Richland Hills, a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas acting
by and through its duly authorized Mayor,
WITNESSETH:
.
WHEREAS, the City of Haltom City is in need of using the Sanitary System
of the. .City of North Richland Hills to transport sewage from the north area of
Haltom City to the Fort Worth facilities;
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills is agreeable to accepting
the additional sewage in its sanitary system, for and in consideration of the
performance of the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained and will
accept sewage from the lines of the City of Haltom City into its own sewer
line~ at points of connection hereinafter described and to transport said
sewage to the Fort Worth 96" outfall main; NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY
THESE PRESENTS: that for and in consideration of the execution and performance
of the mutual covenants herein set forth, the City of Haltom City and the City
of North Richland Hills do hereby covenant and agree as follows:
.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A.
The Cities shall require Centennial Homes to pay the City of
North Richland Hills $30,000 for Haltom City's right to connect to the existing
18" sanitary sewer line.
B. Haltom City will install the necessary fixtures at the points of
connections to permit future installation of sewage metering devices.
Page 1 of 3
.
.
.
- ..
c. Obligate Centennial Homes to cooperate with the two Cities in
providing at no cost any additional easements that may be needed in the future
when it is necessary for North Richland Hills to construct a sewer main paral-
leling the existing IS" rµain.
D. The City of Haltom City will pay monthly to the City of North
Richland Hills a per connection service charge based on the amount paid by
North Richland Hills to the City of Fort Worth, plus ten percent (10%) for
administrative and transportation cost, with a $25.00 per month minimum.
E. Metering devices will be installed at Haltom City's cost at such
time as North Richland Hills is required by the City of Fort Worth to begin
paying to Fort Worth on the basis of metered rates.
F. Haltom City will pay all cost of maintenance of the metering
devices after installation.
G. Haltom City will cooperate with property owners and the City of
North Richland Hills in obtaining any additional easements that may be required
for the future parallel sewer lines.
H. All sewer systems owned by the City of North Richland Hills will
be maintained and operated by North Richland Hills and the sewer systems owned
by the City of Haltom City will be maintained and operated by the City of Haltom
City. Neither City shall have any responsibility or liability now or ever for
the operation or maintenance of said sewers, laterals, mains, submains, and
appurtenances of the other City.
2.
CONTRACT LIFE
Since the City of Haltom City has paid its share of any future line,
the contract will be for infinity except that this contract can be subject to
renegotiation between the parties every ten (10) years. It is contemplated by
the parties hereto that the basis for renegotiation for this agreement will have
as its object computing a fair charge for services that recovers all cost direct
and indirect that might be incurred by either City in providing such services.
Page 2 of 3
"*
.
3.
EFFECTIVE DATES
The effective date of the contract will be the first day of the month
following the acceptance.of contracts by both Cities. For billing purposes, the
effective date will be the first day of the month during which the first introduc-
tion of sewage into the North Richland Hills system occurs.
..
,.
The City or Haltom City and the City of North Richland Hills bind them-
selves, their successors, and assigns to the other party to this agreement and to
the successors and assigns of each other party with respect to all covenants con-
tained in this agreement. Neither party thereto shall assign, sublet, or transfer
any rights hereunder without the written consent of the other party.
In Testimony whereof, after proper action by the respective governing
.
bodies of the parties hereto, we have caused these presents to be executed in
quadruplicate copies, each of which is considered to be an original, and the
'... .
seals of the respective parties are hereto affixed on the date hereinabove set
forth.
. ATTEST:
CITY OF HALTOM CITY
City Secretary
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
ATTEST:
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
City Secretary
Mayor
.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL I TY :
City Attorney
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:
ATTEST:
CENTENNIAL HOMES, INCORPORATED
Corporate Secretary
President
Page 3 of 3
/-1
/ c~/,-I
.
RESOLUTION NUMBER
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, that:
a. There is need for further clarification of the City's
policy regarding the allowable uses of the City Council
Chamber (see Resolution Number 79~10), the Library Meet-
ing Room (see Resolution Number 79-6), and the North
Richland Hills Recreation Center (s~e Resolution Number
80-31); and
b. None of the facilities named in paragraph a, above, nor
any other City owned facilities, shall be used for any
sort of political forum, meeting, discussion, debate or
other type of gathering involving candidates for a poli-
cal office and/or their representatives.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of
1982.
.
Dick Faram - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-10
/ 'fI[ /
. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:.
The Council chamber located in the City Hall at
7301 Northeast Loop 820 shall be used for the following
purposes:
a. City Council meetings
b . Mun;-é j'pa 1 Court
c. City Staff or employee seminars, meetings
or training sessions
d. Such other functions as may be authorized
in advance by the City Manager and/or tne
City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of May
.
ATTEST:
~.. . ..
,1979.
(ð~
Di k Faram, ay r
Janette Moore, City Secretary
.
#
RESOLUTION NO. 79-6
.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS SETTING FORTH RULES FOR USE OF LIBRARY MEETING ROOM BY OUTSIDE GROUPS:
Section 1:
Library Meeting Room
.
a. Lìbrary programs and official city business receive first
consideration in scheduling library meeting room events.
The library meeting room is available for a single meeting
or program of a civic, cultural or educational character·
upon the approval of the Library Director and/or City Manager.
This room is not to be used for religious organizations,
groups marketing a product, social or political gatherings.
Reservations for use of the library meeting room will be
made through the Library Director. Reservations must
include name of organization, time desired, number of per-
sons expected and name and telephone number of person re-
sponsible. Application for reservations should be made in
writing at least two weeks in advance, but not more than
thirty (30) days in advance. A deposit of Twenty-Five
Dollars ($25.00) is required upon application. This deposit
will be returned if room ;s left in an orderly and clean
condition. (Room must be cleaned or the Twenty-Five Dollars
($25.00) will be used for janitorial purposes.) 'The group
will be held responsible for damages to room or equipment.
Also, notice will be given to the group that a second offense
will result in its being denied use of the room.
b.
-...
c. No admission charge may be attached to any meeting scheduled
in the library meeting room.
d. No additional ,furniture or equipment other than that furnished
by the library is to be used without approval of the Library
Director.
e. Smoking will not be permitted in the library meeting room.
Due to lack of kitchen facilities, no refreshments (food or
drink) will be permitted.
f. The fact that a group is permitted to meet in the library
meeting room does not in any way consti.tute and endorsement of
the group's policies or beliefs.
g. Upon adequate notice and for adequate reasons the City Manager
or Library Director reserves the right to revoke permission
to use the library meeting room.
.
.
.
.
Resolutlon No.
Pag~ 2
(cont'd)
PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of April 1979.
--.
ATTEST:
J nette Moore - City Secretary
RESOLUTION NO.
80-31
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
. HILLS, TEXAS, THAT THE FOllOWING RULES SHALL BE FOLLOWED CONCERNING USE OF
THE NORTH RICHlAND HILLS RECREATION· CENTER:
a. Recreation programs and official city business receive first
consideration in scheduling the recreation center room. The
recreation center room is available for a single meeting or
program of a c;vict. cultural or educational character upon
the approval of the Parks and Recreation Director and/or
City Manager. This facility is not to be used for religious
organizations, groups marketing a productt or political
gatherings.
.
b. Reservations for use of the recreation center room will be
made through the Recreation Director. Reservations must
include name of organizationt time desiredt number of
persons expected and name and telephone number of persons
responsible. Application for reservations should be made
in writing at least two weeks in advance, but not more than
thirty (30) days in advance. A fee of $40.00 is required for
the use of this facility. In additiont a deposit of $100.00
is required upon application. This deposit will be returned
if rooms· are left in an orderly and clean condition, and when the
key to the recreation center is returned. (Rooms must be
cleaned or the one hundred dollars will be used for janitorial
purpose~.) The group will be held responsible for damages
to rooms or equipment. Also, notice will be given to the
group that a second offense will result in its being denied
use of the room.
-
c. No admission charge or donation may be attached to any
meeting scheduled in the recreation center.
d. No additional furniture or equipment other than that furnished
by the recreation center is to be used without approval of
the recreation center director.
e. The fact that a group is permitted to meet in the recreation
center room does not in any way constitute an endorsement
of the group's policies or beliefs.
f. Upon adeq~ate notice and for adequate reasons the City Manager
or Recreation Director reserves the right to revoke permission
to use the recreation center room.
.
--
.
Resolution Na.
Page 2
(cant'd)
80-31
PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of October
, 1980.
/'
¿j,~ .
D1Ck Faram - Mayor
ATTEST:
.
~
City Secretary
e
..
·DATE: Nnvpmhpr Sf ,'gR2- ·
- -,
. .
.
PS 82-40 Replat of Lots lR-4R, ·B,lock B, College Hill Addition
SUBJECT:
.
DEPARTMENT:
Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND:
This property is located on the north side ~! Bogart Street at Hol~day Lane. ~
, This request was heard by the Planning & Zoning'Commission on October 21st ånd was denied'
due to some prob 1 ems they ha·d ånd a 1 s.o thè. Cornmi ss ion. thought the. property o\fJned by these
"
- people on the west· si.de of HolidaY'~ane should' have·been'includ.ed in this.plat. ·S-ince
. this case was denied, the problems have bee'n resolved and after talking with th'eir En·gineer,
, the Commissiån did not feel the'land to the west had to be'included in .the plat så the
, Commission reconsidered this rep~at on November 4th and app~ûved it subject to the Engineer's
comments and subject tó' sï"gníng a covenant running with the'land to the west of Ho.1id"ay L-áne
for str.eet, curb & gutt~r, drainage, and water ~. sewer.
4IÞ ~he minutès of Octo~e; 2rst are not ~ompleted2 but I h~ve included the minutes of Nov. 4th.
~. The reason for the rush, these people haNe a dead1ine to meet for closjng on this property.
. .. ..... .. !., .,
CITY COUNCIL ACTION lŒQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
.
JJo.--~ C~
----~~---~-~~~-~~~~~--------~-~---~--~~-~~-~~--~~~~--~~~-~---~--~-----~~--~---
. \\0 ~å
/0
~ J
,j
"\%~'...
o 'U
\0
7.., /
. \ f"ì _
\ /:}'\;;O¡I
~-'. ú
. / q U/
.\lv;/C;O
r'\ . "//1 L,{ "
/' '-7
I \ -'6
\¡Ý
{'ri(L)
0-·1
.~
, \.
\ ¿ TV
, S 1
.')
",
,_. -1 V
\ ~ '} /!J
l ), J 'J
)~/\~'O
/01
\.,
A
Ce
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1.
PS 82-40
c.
(e
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND .HILLS, TEXAS
NOVEMBER 4, 1982 6:30 P. M.
The meeting was called ,to order by the
Chairman, George Tucker, at 6:35 P. M.
PRESENT:
CHAIRMAN
SECRETARY
MEMBERS
AL T. MEMBER
ASST. D IR .. PW/U
p & Z COORDINATOR
ABSENT:
George Tucker
Marjorie Nash
Don Bowen
Mark Wood
John Schwinger
A 11 en Bronstad
Wanda Ca 1 vert
Mark Hannon
Request of TLB-GSC Enterprises~ Inc.
for RECONSIDERATION of th~ replat of
Lots 2R-6, revised· to Lots'lR-4R,
Block B, College Hill Addition.
The Chairman said the reason for the
reconsideration of this request was due
to a techni,cality. . He said there was
the thought that the land to the west
of Holiday Lane, which is also owned by
TLB-GSC Enterpri~es, was contigous to
thep.roperty in this replat, but' the
Commissi'on found out after talking with
their Engineer, Dick Perkins, that the
property to the west was, out of another
tract of land and did not have to be
"included in this plat.
Dick Perkins came forward to represent
TLB-GSC Eriterprises. He said they had
received the City Engineer's comments
and were in agreement with #1 an~ will
have. this correctiorr made before the
final approvaJ by the City Council; #3
is a City Staff functîon; and #2 regarding
the construction of curb & gutter and
street, and the extension of the water
. line, t·1r. Perkins said he had discussed
this with M~.. Riddle and they agreed to
sign a covenañt to rµn with the land to
the ~est of.'Holiday Lane, to do this when
they develop the land on both sides of
c.
C...
~
.
'"
Page 2
p & Z Minutes
November 4, 1982
Holiday Lane. He said they prefer to
sign a covenant.
Mr. Perkins said t1r. Bonham owns the
property across' Holiday Lane and they
plan to combine both sides of the street
for development at. a later date, not only
the property to the north of this replat,
but almost to the Smithfield-Watauga Road
since they will need it 'for ,access to the
property.
Mr.' Perkins said if they had to do this
construction now, i,t would make them have
a very high unit cost.
Mr. Tucker asked Mr.'Bronstad if Mr. Riddle
had discussed this with him.
Mr. Bronstad said he had not.
Ms. Calvert said Mr. Riddle said if they
made the covenant to run with the land to
the west, he would agree to it.
Mr. Tucker said the 15 ft. building line
would have to be continued north along the
east side of Holiday Lane all the way.
PS 82-40
APPROVED
-.' Mr. Perkins said that was fine. He showed
the Commission how they plan to layout the
future lots, and said they would agree to
the 15 ft. building line along Holiday Lane.
Ms. Nash made a motion to approve PS 82-40
subject to the Engineer's comments with the
exception of item #2, A & B, of the City
EngineerJs letter of November 2nd, that
a satisfactory arrangement be made with the
developer and City Staff on item #2-A & B.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and
the motion carried 5-0.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 6:45 P. M.
. "
.
.
.
(
\'--
(,. .
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
November 2, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-804, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
COLLEGE HILLS ADDN., LOTS lR, 2R, 3R,
& 4R, BLOCK B, REVISED REPLAT, PS 82-40
We have received the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval'.
2. Although only a revised replat has been submitted to us for review,
the City Staff has pointed out proposed-engineering revisions which
you may wish to consider:
a. Developer construction of curb and gutter and pavement extension
of Holiday Lane from Bogart Drive to the north line of this
proposed development.
b. Developer construction of an 8-inch water main along the east
side of Holiday Lane from the existing 12-inch water line at
Holiday Lane and Bogart Drive to the north line of this develop-
ment as shown in the water distribution system master plan.
3. All utility companies should be advised of the proposed replat
revisions.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
~~
P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager,
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Pµblic Works
Mr. Allen Bronastad, Assistant Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
.
.
.
.
c_
{'
\
October 26, 1982
TO: City o~ North Richland Hills
Dear Sirs:
This letter is to inform you that I was and æm presently a member
or the Board or Directors or Fo~t Worth Christian Schools. I was
authorized by the board to negotiate the contract or sale and con-
vey title to a portion or the property in Block "B", College Hill
Addition, North Richland Hills, Texas.
I was at that time and am now fully aware or the intended use o~
the prope~ty and fully support approval ot the plat as submitted
by TLB-GSC Enterprises, Inc.
■
817 336-5773
149 TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS
Ka., C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
October 14, 1982
Planning 5 Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: College Hills Addition
Lots 2R & 3-6 , Block B
Replat, PS 82-40
Dear Commission Members:
We are in receipt of Mr . Albin' s letter dated October 13,
1982, regarding the replat of the subject subdivision. On
behalf of our client, Theron Bonham, we are in agreement with
the first three comments, and we will be glad to comply with
same prior to final approval of this replat. In regard to
item 4 , we would like to discuss this matter with you during
your meeting of October 21, 1982, as our development plans
for Lot 2R would make it unnecessary to establish a 25-foot
building set-back line on this lot.
Thank you for your cooperation and the review of this replat.
Very truly yours,
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC.
J. i;hard Perkins, P.E.
JRP/slm
cc: Mr . Theron Bonham
210 West 6th Street,Suite 600 Executive Plaza Building Fort Wo4h,Texas 76102
f'
.
1.
2.
. 3.
4.
e
(~
c
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
October 13, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North R;chland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-804, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
COLLEGE HILLS ADDN., LOTS 2R AND 3-6,
BLOCK B, REPLAT, PS 82-40
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
The Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and Notary Certification
should be fully executed before approval.
We would request that the Zoning (MF) be noted on the final plat.
All utility companies should be consulted regarding any additional
easement requi rements which they may have for this plat.
A 25 foot building setback line should be provided on Lot 2R which
fronts on Holiday Lane, and should be continued through Lot 3 to
avoid a jog in the building line between these two contiguous lots.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367