The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1981-01-12 Agendas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting January 12, 1981 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN PRE-COUNCIL 6:00 P.M. 1 . Executive Session - Personnel (Closed due to subject matter) 2. Discussion on Rufe Snow Drive Street/ Drainage Improvements 3. Discussion on Comprehepsive Land Planning (Present;,tion by Chuck Williams and Jim Wood) COUNCIL S 7:30 P.M. 1 . Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting December 8, 1931 5. Proclamation - Presented to Fort Worth Christian School proclaiming Cardinal Day January 12, 1981 , 6. Consideration of Request of Dale Jessup, n 'Li() 5309 Greenwood Way, for variance from III ^l' Brick Ordinance CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting January 12, 1981 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM I ACTION TAKEN 7. Consideration of Request of J. D. Griffith, 6632 Chilton, for variance from Brick Ordinance 8. Consideration of Request of Paul Schmidt, 4716 Lariat Drive, to drill a well . 9 . Consideration of request of Community Cable Advisory Panel on use of franchise fee - presented by Dan Echols 10. PS 80-57, Request of Forrest Johnson, for final plat of Lot 1 , Block 4, Hewitt Estates 11 . PS 80-59, Pequest of City of North Richland Hills for replat of Holiday North, Section 7 12. PS 80-63, Request of College Hill Church of Christ for final elat of _ Lots A & B, Block 28, College Hill Addition 13. Consideration of bids for light fixtures at Richfield Park --_ .4. Consideration of bids for surplus park property -- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Eor the Meeting January 12, 1981 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM 1 ACTION TAKEN 15. Consideration of payment to Sharrock Electric, Inc. in the amount of $3,199.84 for installation of traffic — signals 16. Consideration of payment to City of Hurst in the amount of $6,603.00 for improvement to Precinct Line Road 17. Consideration of Resolution to ma.------- __ approve appropriation of funds for Comprehensive Plan 18. Consideration of contract for i_ Comprehensive Plan with Wayne W. Snyder _ - & Associates. _ 19. Consideration of Resolution for the __ position of Director of City Planning 20. Appointment of Board of Equalization ._ for 1981 21 . Consideration of resignation of Councilman Bob Brady, Place Six 22. 4 Adjournment -r r \·e 1. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, DECEMBER 8, 1980 - 7:30 P.M. 1- Mayor Faram called the meeting to order December 8, 1980, CALL TO ORDER at 7:30 P.M. 2. Present: . Di ck Faram Jim v!ood J. C. Hubbard Wiley Thomas Bob Brady Dave Freeman Sharyl Groves ~1ayor ROLL CALL Councilmen Councilwoman Staff: Chuck Williams Jeanette t·1oore Rex r·1cEnti ~e Richard Albin Dennis Horvath Carl Greenfield Don Bowen Ci ty r~anager City Secretary City Attorney City Engineer Assistant City Manager Planning & Zoning Member Planning & Zoning Member Pres s ;. ... ' Joe Norton Lynda Johnson Kelvin Todd News Tribune Ft. Worth Star Telegram North Ri chl and NevIs ~ e Absent: . Jim Kenna Councilman 3. The invocation was given by Councilman Hubbard. INVOCATION Mayor Faram advised there was a legal petition against items 10 and 12 and would require a 3/4 majority vote. Mayor Faram stated that since there was not a total Council present he would give the applicants the option of having the request postponed. Mr. Oarrel Wood, attorney, representing case PZ 80-38, item 10, stated he would like for this request to stay on the agenda. Mr. Rick Cambell, representing PZ 80-36, item 10, asked that this request be postponed. 4. Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to approve the minutes of the special meeting November 17, 1980. Councilman Hubbard stated that item 2 should read "1F-12 homes". APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETIN. NOVEt~BER 17, .1980 APPROVED AS CORRECTED Motion to approve as corrected carried 6-0. e December 8, 1980 Page 2 r I I 5. Councilman Hubbard nloved, seconded by Councilman Hood, to approve the mi nutes of the speci a 1 meeti ng f'Jovember 22, 1 980. ,l\PPROV!\L OF n I rJU rES OF SPEC I A L r" E E T I r J G f..!OV Et1ß ER 22, 1 980 APPROVED AS CORRECTE[ Mayor Faram stated that on page 2, section 2, it should state Iteast along the Rail road right-of-vJay." Motion to approve as corrected carried 6-0. WHEREAS, the North Hills Mall has recently brought favorable comment and recognition upon itself and this City by earning the IIt1AXI-AUARD11 issued by the International Council of Shopping Centers; and, PROCLAt1ATIO~J - PRESEiJTED TO RO~·J UELLER, PROCLAI!"1ING r~ORTH HILLS tJEEK DECEt1BER 15-21 6. Mayor Faram read the following proclamation: HHEREAS, the unders i gned t1ayor of North Ri chl and Hi 11 s Texas, deems it proper and necessary to call attention to such honor as bestowed. ...~ ' fJ01'!, THEREFORE, BE IT PR'OCLAlf'lED by the r'1ayor of rJorth Richland Hills, Texas, that: The week of December 15 through December 21,1980 is hereby designated as IIt~ORTH HILLS t~JEEKI' in the City of North Richland Hills. The citizens are especially urged to visit Harth Hills t1all during this week and extend their congratulations and best wishes for success to the management and employees in r~orth Hills r'1all. Proclaimed this 8th day of December 1980. Ir~ TESTIr~10NY HHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of north Richland Hills, Texas, to be affixed this 8th day of December, A.D., 1980. Mayor Dick Faram Mr. Ron Weller, General Manager North Hills Mall, accepted the proclamation. íe 7. ( i j e Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to confirm the appointment of George C. Tucker to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 6-0. 8. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas, to appoint Dr. Dale Gaskill of the Birdville School District to the Community Cable Advisory Panel. Motion carried 6-0. 9. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to the Engineers· comments. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to approve PS 80-53. ...~ .. Motion carried 6-0. 10. This item postponed. 11. This item postponed. 12. Councilman Brady asked to be disqualified from the discussion on this request because of a personal interest. Mayor Faram excused Councilman Brady from the table. Mr. Darrel Wood, attorney, representing Mr. Lusk asked the Mayor to delay this request for five minutes. Mr. ~Jood s ta ted tha t Counc'j 1 Jl1an Kenna "'Jas on his voJay to the meeting. , Mayor Faram granted the request. . \ I' December 8, 1980 Page 3 CONFIRMATION OF APPOINT~1ENT OF GEORGE C. TUCKER TO PLANNING & ZONING COr~MISSION APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTt,1ENT OF DR. DALE GASKILL TO COMMUNITY CABLE ADVISORY PANEL APPROVED PS 80-53, REQUEST OF SCHICK SHADEL HOSPITAL FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 0, CALLOWAY FARMS ADDITION APPROVED . PUBLIC HEARING PZ 80-36, REQUEST OF t1ARVIN Sr~ITH TO REZONE LOT 15R, BLOCK 1, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION, FROM 1F-9 ONE FAMILY DWELLING TO LOCAL RETAIL POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-36 POSTPONED PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF RON LUSK TO REZONE TRACT lOA1, FROM IF-9 ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS TO.2F-9 TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS COUNCILMAN KENNA NOW PRESENT. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing on PZ 80-38 and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Darrell Wood~ attorney representing Mr. Lusk, appeared before the Council. Mr. Wood stated he had not represented this request at the Planning and Zoning meeting but had read the minutes and detected the objections. Mr. Wood stated this property consisted of approximately two acres and there was a small unkept structure on the property. r~r. Wood showed pictures of the structure and vacant lot. Mr. Wood stated one objection raised from the residents was that two family dwellings would distract from the neighborhood and would cause property values to go down. Mr. Wood stated the market value of the duplexes would be about $80,000.00. Mr. Wood stated the structure woUld be approximately 2,030 square feet and it would be an improvement to the area. Mr. Wood stated the units would rent for approximately $850.00, , $425.00 per side. Mr. Wood stated if the Council approvedthe request it would be providing more taxes for the city and a'ptace-for~peòplð to live. Mr. Wood stated if this request was approved they would install a stockade fence between the duplexes and the homes in the area. Mr. Wood showed pictures of the backyards of the homes next to the property in question. Mr. Wood stated another objection the homeowners had was that it was a quiet neighborhood and the duplexes would create more noise. ~1r. Wood stated he did not think the neighborhood was immune to noise. Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Wood about the parking facilities for the duplexes. Mayor Faram advised the parking would be covered under a separate ordinance. Mr. Hedgcoth, engineer, advised they would comply with the ordinances. December 8, 1980 Page 4 ~ ¡ i 1 Councilman Kenna asked how many units would be built. Mr. Wood stated six units would be built. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. Mr. Don Vandever, 4309 Ashmore, appeared before the Council. Mr. Vandever stated he lived on the southeast corner of the property in question. Mr. Vandever stated he was not present at the Planning and Zoning Commission when this case was heard, but he did sign a petition against the rezoning. Mr. Vandever stated his was a new house in the neighborhood and he looked hard and long to where he was moving in. Mr. Vandever stated it was a single family neighborhood and he moved from his previous house because of apartments. Mr. Vandever stated those apartments rented for $500.00 and people still moved in and out. Mr. Vandever stated he had invested $100,000_00 in his property and would like to see the Council maintain the neighborhood. Mr. Vandever stated he had yet to see duplexes that were successful. ~~, Mayor Faram advised Mr. Vandever that the petition he· had signed did bear legal weight and it would require that 3/4 of the Council vote in favor of the request before it tIÞ could be approved. ~ I Mr. Pat Marrs, 4313 Ashmore, appeared before the Council. Mr. Marrs stated ten foot of his property adjoined the property in question and he would like to support what Mr. Vandever had saîd. They wanted the neighborhood to stay single family. Mrs. Sallie B. Carter, 7809 Randall, appeared before the Council. e Mrs. Carter stated she was against apartments. t1rs. Carter stated the pictures Mr. Wood showed was on each side of her property and people were living in the house shown on the property. Councilman Freeman asked t1rs. Carter where she lived in relation to the property asking to be rezoned. Mrs. Carter replied she lived north of the property. Her backyard backed up to the property. December 8, 1980 Page 5 Mrs. Mary Vaughn, 4317 Ashmore Drive, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Vaughn stated she was the one that circulated the petition and fifteen out of sixteen people signed it. Mrs. Vaughn stated she hoped the Council would take the petition into consideration when they voted on this request. r1rs. Vaughn stated there was a lot of traffi c in the area due to TowneOaks apartments. Mrs. Vaughn stated she did not feel duplexes would help the traffic situation. Mrs. Vaughn stated this was a quiet neighborhood at the present time and they wanted to keep it that way. Councilman Wood stated there were twenty-two people within 200 feet of the property in question. Councilman Wood asked Mrs. Vaughn if she could tell how the rest felt. Mrs. Vaughn stated she was unable to find everyone at home at the time she took the petition. Councilman Wood asked Mrs. Vaughn if she was aware that Booth-Calloway Road was schedul~d' to be rebuilt and would probably become a secondary thoroughfare. Mrs. Vaughn stated yes, but the people she had talked to did not want duplexes. Mrs. Vaughn stated if the duplexes rented for $425.00 that was low and would not attract the highest class of people. Councilwoman Groves asked Mrs. Vaughn that since she had taken the petition, what was their major reason for being against the duplexes. Mrs. Vaughn states she wanted the neighborhood to stay one family and if duplexes were built it would bring in more people and more traffic. Mr. Lawrence Vaughn, 4317 Ashmore Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Vaughn stated he lived east of the property in question. Mr. Vaughn stated he felt this was a nice neighborhood and he wanted to keep it that way. They did not want duplexes. Mr. Vaughn stated he had talked to some of the people before he bought his property and bought because it was one family. Mrs. Carolyn Myers, 4321 Ashmore Drive, appeared before the Council. rv1rs. Î'·1yers stated she lived right next to the property.. r·1rs. ~'1yers stated her husband had passed away a year ago and she did not want transienipeople in the neighborhood. Mrs. Myers stated there had been t"JO shootings in the TovJneOaks apartrnents. Mrs. Myers stated there was already a lot of traffic and duplexes would increase it. December 8; 1980. Page 6 ~ l f t f .~ Mrs. Myers asked if this request was granted, could she build an apartment on her property for her mother. Mayor Faram replied no, that would have to be in a separate action. Mr. Kenneth Bell, 4316 Ashmore Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Bell stated he lived directly across the street from the people that had just appeared. Mr. Bell stated he sold the lot to Mr. Vandever and he had built a $100,000.00 home on it and he could see how he felt about the duplexes being built. Mr. Bell stated the attorney had stated they were going to build 2,000 square foot homes, but that was only 1,000 square feet per unit. Mr. Bell stated $400.00 a month was easy for people to make today and he thought there would be a lot of moving in and out. Mr. Bell stated he would like to keep the neighborhood the way it is at the present time. Mrs. Carolyn Bell, 4316 AshmQre~Drive, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Bell stated she had lived at this address for fourteen or fifteen years. It was a quièt neighborhood and there was also a lot of traffic at Ashmore and Glenview now, duplexes would increase the traffic. Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood asked for rebuttal time. Mayor Faram stated with the Council's permission he would grant Mr. Wood five minutes. Mr. Wood, attorney, reappeared before the Council. Mr. Wood stated the question .had come up about rentals and he had some comfortable rentals of apartments in the North Richland Hills area that reflected rentals going from $230.00 a month for a very large apartment to $410.00. Mr. Wood stated that when you were talking about $200.00 to $300.00 a month rental you were not talking about the same people who would be putting out $450.00 a month. Mr. Wood stated he was not talking about apartment dwellers, he was talking about people living in duplexes. December 8, 1980 Page 7 Mr. Wood stated he would like to point out to the Council that two of the lots faced Booth-Calloway and the other four, the first four lots off Booth-Calloway facing Rogene. Mr. Wood stated Booth-Calloway was under plans for widening and there was no reason why traffic would go the other way if they could get out on Booth-Calloway. Mr. Wood stated he would like to mention to the Council that duplexes was the highest and best use of this piece of property. Mr. Wood stated that if there would be any economical basic justification to building single family houeses on the property that would be done. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Wood how long his ëlient had owned the property. Mr. Wood stated the property was under contract. The sale was subject to the rezoning approval. Councilman Freeman asked how long the property had been on the market. ~~ Mr. Wood stated about sii months. Councilman Wood stated he had looked at the plans anq it did not show egress and ingress or parking. Mr. Wood stated they would comply with the ordinances concerning egress, ingress and parking. Councilman Wood asked City Engineer Albin what the off street parking 'requirements were. Mr. Albin stated he did not know the specific requirements. Mr. Wood stated there would be rear entry parking. Mr. Ernest Hedgcoth, engineer, stated there would be covered parking in the rear with the entry on the side. Mr. Hedgcoth stated the lots were 209 feet deep and there would be a very large area in the back. Councilman Wood asked what size the carports would be. Mr. Hedgcoth stated four cars each unit. Councilwoman Groves asked if the carports would be attached. Mr. Hedgcoth stated yes. Councilman Thomas asked if there would be other areas for parking or would they have to park on the street. December 8, 1980 Page 8 ~ i . 14. - I Mr. Hedgcoth stated there would be room in the rear of the duplexes if needed. Mayor Faram offered the opposition the opportunity to speak again. Mr. Don Vandever, 4309 Ashmore, appeared before the Council. Mr. Vandever stated the attorney stated there were öther ways in and out of the neighborhood, the only thru street was Ashmore. Mr. Vandever stated no one would drive down Booth-Calloway it was almost impassable. Mr. Vandever stated there was already a lot of traffic in the neighborhood. Mr. Vandever stated that if the people in the duplexes had more than one car and boat and it all was parked in the back, where were the kids going to play. Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. 13. Mayor Faram advised the Coun~il~there was a legal petition on this request and would require a 3/4 majority vote of the Counci 1 for approval. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve PZ 80-38, Ordinance No. 860. Councilman Freeman stated he saw this as spot zoning. The petition bore a lot of weight with him and told him the neighborhood did not desire a change. Councilman Kenna stated he would have to agree with Councilman Freeman. Councilman Kenna stated the situation might change after Booth-Calloway was fixed. Councilman Wood asked the City Attorney if this was considered spot zoning. Mr. McEntire stated this would not be classified as spot zoning. Councilwoman Groves stated she understood the developers, but the petition bore a lot of weight with her also. Motion to approve failed by a vote of 4-2; Councilmen Kenna, Freeman, Wood and Councilwoman Groves voting against; Councilmen Hubbard and Thomas voting for. (Councilman Brady excused from the discussion and voting.) Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to deny PS 80-47. Motion carried 6-0. Councilman Brady returned to the Council table. ~ December 9, 1980 Page 9 CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-38 ORDINANCE NO. 860 DENIED PS 80-47, REQUEST OF RON LUSK FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 8-14, BLOCK 8, RICHLAND HEIGHTS ADDITION DENIED December ~, 1980 Page 10 Mr. Anagnostis stated the Pizza Hut was located on the Grapevine Highway. Mr. Anagnostis stated the Planning and Zoning Commission had approved this request. Mr. Anagnostis stated the sale of alcoholic beverages in Pizza Hut would not effect the health, welfare or safety of people. Mr. Anagnostis stated they felt they could better serve their customers if allowed to sell beer. Mr. Anagnostis stated there were other establishments in the area that served mixed drinks. Mr. Anagnostis stated he had between 120 and 130 people in support of this request. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Anagnostis if there would be any problem if the permit was issued in the owners name and not just Pizza Hut~. ~' Mr. Anagnostis stated there would be no problem. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Anagnostis if they would agree to sign a letter stating the City had the right to audit the books. PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 80-41, REQU' OF PIZZA HUT OF NORTH TEXAS TO REZONE LOT 1, BLOCK 25, CLEARVIE~ ADDITION FROM LOCAL RETAIL TO LOCAL RETAIL-SPECIFIC- USE-SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES l 15. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Thomas Anagnostis appeared before the Council to represent Pizza Hut in this request. Mr. Anagnostis stated they would sign the letter. Ms. Sharon Osboune, 7512 Maplewood, Apartment 231, appeared before the Council. Ms. Osboune stated she felt people in the city should be able to drink beer in the Pizza Hut. Councilman Wood asked Ms. Osboune if she worked for the company. Ms. Osboune stated yes. Councilman Wood asked Mrs. Osboune if there would be any problems with juveniles. Ms. Osboune replied no. - I ¡ -, I . December 8,1980 Page 11 Councilman Thomas asked Ms. Osboune if there would be any problem determining ages and what per cent of the customers were under 18. Ms. Osboune stated there would be no problem with ages and about 5% of the customers were under 18. Jonathan Link, 3708 Oakbriar Lane, Bedford, Regional Manager, Pizza Hut, appeared before the Council. t1r. Lì nk stated the Pi zza Hut was very much a family business. Mr. Link stated their competitors sold beer and felt they should be able to also. Ms. Vickie Hall, 5904 North Hills Dr., appeared before the Council. Ms. Hall stated she was for the issue. She would like to be able to buy the beverage of her choice. John Bounds, 7513 Oakridge Circle, appeared before the Council. Mr. Bounds stated he was all for beer in the Pizza Hut. Ms. Dina Lindsey, 5108 Maplewood Court, appeared before the Council. Ms. Lindsey stated she was in favor of this request. Ms. Karen Dickerson, 8009 Clark, appeared before the Counci 1 .. Ms. Dickerson stated she was in favor of beer in the North Richland Hills Pizza Hut. Mr. William McCarthy, 7500 Terry Court, appeared before the Council. Mr. McCarthy stated he was for the request due to other businesses having it. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. , 16. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to approve PZ 80-41, Ordinance No. 861. r I ~ Motion carried 7-0. COUNCILMAN KENNA LEFT THE MEETING AT THIS POINT. 17. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Beryl Stewart, 409 Fieldstone representing Dr. Waggener, appeared before the Council. Mr. Stewart stated they were requesting this rezoning to construct a medical clinic and ask the Council's approval Mayor Faram asked if this property was part of the property involved in litigátion. Mr. Stewart stated yes, but they were prepared to sign a convenant on this tr~_ct.~~, Mayor Faram stated he would have to question the Council's consideration of this item until the litigation had been resolved. ( ~ l r,1r. f'1cEntire asked ~1r. Stewart if he proposed to agree to the assessment and pull this particular tract out of the 1 a\t/su it. Mr. Stewart replied that was correct, if possible. Mr. McEntire stated it was possible. ~1r. Stewart stated it seemed the Council could go ahead and approve the request subject to the outcome of the litigation. ~1r. Stewart stated the assessment was going to be there one way or the other. Mr. McEntire stated the Council could pass the ordinance subject to the delivery of the dismissal of this particular tract, which would not make the ordinance effective until that had been done. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this requeste There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. December 8, 1980 Page 12 CONSIDERATIOf! OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-41 ORDINANCE NO. 861 APPROVED PUBLIC HEARInG - PZ 80-42, REQUEST OF DR. JAMES WAGGENf TO REZONE TRACT 170 AND A PORTION OF TRACT 168, ABSTRACT 1606 FRon IF-7 ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS T{ LOCAL RETAIL , I I ¡ - í ! r1ayor Faram advised the Council would go into executive session with the City Attorney to discuss this pending litigation. r~ayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council and Staff members were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting with the exception of Councilman Thomas. 18. Councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilwoma~ Groves, to approve PZ 80-42, Ordinance No. 862. ~1ayor Faram asked t1r. StevJart if he vIas the O\vner of the property. nr. Stewart stated no, he represented the o\¡./ner, yr1CA \'Ja s the o\\ner. t1r. t1cEnti re stated f,1r. Ste\vart had the property under contract without any contingency clause. ~. .. r·1r. Stewart stated Dr. l'Jaggener was tryi ng to purchase the property. Mayor Faram asked r1r. Stewart if the approval or disapproval of this request had any bearing on the contract. Mr. Stewart replied yes. nayor Faram asked t'1r. Stewart if the request was not approved would Dr. Waggener not pay for the property. Mr. Stewart replied that was correct. Councilman Brady asked Mr. Stewart if he were suggesting that Yt1CA would have to institute a suit for specific performance if the request was not granted. r·1r. Ste\¡Jart replied yes. t1r. Stevlart stated this problem came about when he came to City Hall and along with one of the employees, looked at the zoning map., This particular piece of property had Local Retail printed on it, but the oversight was an arrow pointing across the street to another piece of property. Mr. Stewart stated it was his incorrect assumption that this property vIas zoned correctly. ~1r. Ste\~/art stated when he applied for a building permit it was denied because the property WilS not zoned correctly. Councilman Brady asked Mr. Stewart if the zoning were approved, the contract would close and the Doctor would e become the Q\,·mer. Mr. Stewart replied that was correct. Decenlber 8, 1980 Page 13 EXECUTIVE SESSION BACK TO ORDER CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-42 ORDINANCE NO. 862 POSTPONED December 8,~1980 Page 14 Councilman Brady asked Mr. Stewart if the zoning were approved, would there be any other problems. Mr. Stewart replied no. They had been ready to cl~se since August. Mr. McEntire asked Mr. Stewart what was keeping the property from closing from the standpoint of the contract itself if it was not contingent on the zoning, was the Doctor just not going to come up with the money. Mr. Stewart stated the money was in escrow, but the Doctor refused to release the money for closing until the property was zoned correctly because he was not going to give $59,000.00 for property he could not use. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Stewart if he felt a lawsuit would be initiated from the YMCA for nonperformance if the zoning was denied. ~~~ Mr. Stewart replied yes. Mayor Faram stated that in light of the discussion the Council would go back into executive session with the City Attorney. Mr. 'Stewart stated he had looked at another piece of property and it had multi-zoning. They made application for a building permit and could not get one because it had two different zonings. Mayor Faram asked when the contract was signed on the property being requested to be rezoned. Mr. Stewart replied the contract was signed August 4, 1980. Mayor Faram asked if the contract was signed prior to the lawsuit being filed. Mr. Stewart stated he did not know when the lawsuit was filed. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Stewart if he was made aware of the lawsuit. Mr. Stewart stated he was made aware of the suit after the contract was signed. December 8, 1980 Page 15 . Mayor Faram stated the Council would go back into executive session with the Attorney. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council and Staff members were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting with the exception of Councilman Thomas. BACK TO ORDER Councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to postpone action on PZ 80-42, Ordinance No. 862, until some legal problems involving the property were resolved. Motion carried 5-0. 19. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. t1r. Ernest Hedgcoth, consulting engineer, appeared before the Council representing Mr. Haws. PüBLIC HEARING - PZ 80-43 - REQUEST OF RUSSEL M. HAWS TO REZONE TRACT 38, ABSTRACT 308, FROM ~,1UL TI-FAMIL Y TO LOCAL RETAIL . ~1r. Hedgcoth stated ~1r. Haws p.ropûsed to bui 1 d a two story office building on this property. Mr. Hedgcoth stated the property was currently zoned multi-family and he checked with Mrs. Calvert of the Planning and Zoning Department and she requested the zoning be changed to Local Retail in order to facilitate this building. Mr. Hedgcoth showed the Council a drawing of the building.. Mr. Hedgcoth stated the Jo Beel1s restaurant was in the southeast corner of the property which was 7.8 acres. Mr. Haws purchased a 1.2 acre tract on the northeast corner of the property. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 20. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve PZ 80-43, Ordinance No. 863. Motion carried 5-0. CONSIDERATION OF .ORDINÞ,NCE FOR PZ 80-43 ORDINANCE NO. 863 APPROVED e December 8; 1980 Page 16 Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve the specifications for the bid on the computer system, subject to final approval by the Council. PS 80-55, REQUE~T OF RUSSEL r~. HA. FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 5, RICHLAND OAKS ADDN. APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF COt·1PUTER SYSTEf1 SPECIFICATIONS APPROVED , t.21. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Hood, to approve PS 80-55. Motion carried 5-0. 22. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Computer Committee had met and recommended the specifications for bidding. Motion carried 5-0. .A>~ .. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR P'OLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR WATER AND SEWAGE SYSTEM, PRESENTED BY RICHARD ALBIN AND ALLEN BRONSTAD POSTPONED CONSIDERATION 0 ORDINANCE At1ENDING ESTES COr~TRACT APPROVED 23. Mayor Faram stated there was a request to postpone this item. It was not ready for consideration. Councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilman'Wood, to postpone action on this item. Motion carried 5-0. ~24. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No. 864. Councilman Hubbard stated he had looked over this ordinance very carefully and had discussed it with four local haulers in the area and they said it was the best ordinance they had seen written for a city the size of North Richland Hills. Motion to approve carried 5-0. 25. City Attorney McEntire stated this was a public hearing in conjunction with a resolution that North Richland Hills passed in January 1980, in which the boundaries within Haltom City and North Richland Hills were changed. ~1r. t1cEntire stated that at that time r1r. Jerry Stevens had come to North Richland Hills Council and Haltom City Council in connection with building some property into North Richland Hills which was developable. PUBLIC HEARING - ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY (REVISION OF BOUNDARY WITH HALTor·1 CITY) r1r~ t1cEntire stated that under the terrns of the resolution the city would give back to the development company property that had been conveyed to North Richland Hills, which would end up in Haltom City and this new boundary line was established. I t Mr. McEntire stated the city had 90 days in which to pass the deannexation and annexation ordinance which would change the boundaries. Mayor Faram opened the .public hearing and call.ed for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak~ Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. 26. Mr. Horvath stated this was an ongoing traffic survey and the State Department of Office Traffic Safety needed the name of a project director. Allen Bronstad would be the director. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve Resolution No. 80-37. Motion carried 5-0. 27. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman~ to approve Ordinance No. 865. Motion carried 5-0. ...~ " ~ 28. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve Resolution No. 80-38. Motion carried 5-0. 29. Mr. Albin stated HUD was going to fund up to $89,000.00 for the Mackey Creek project and the total cost would be $100,000.00. Mr. Albin stated Mr. Bronstad had informed him the $11,000.00 that was needed could be taken from Utility Fund Surplus. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve $11,000.00 out of Utility Fund Surplus for the Mackey Creek Project. Motion carried 5-0. 30. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to approve payment to First Southwest Company in the amount of $26,665.52. r . ~ Motion carried 5-0. December 8, 1980 Page 17 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 80-37 CONSIDERATION FOR DISPOSITION OF STOLE~ ABANDONED FOUND PROPERTY IN POSSE- SSION OF POLICE DEPARTMENT APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 865 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION FOR UNAUTHORIZED STREET CUTS ON RUFE SNOW APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 80-38 CONSIDERi\TION OF PAYMENT TO FIRST SOUTHWEST COMPANY I N THE Af..10UNT OF $26,665e52 - WATER AND SEWER BOND APPROVED December 8, "' 98.0 Page 18 Motion carried 5-0. CONSIDERATION OF vJITHDRAVJAL FRO~·1 SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAt~ APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 80-39 ADJOURNMENT 31. Councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve Resolution No. 80-39. 32. Mayor .Faram adjourned the meeting of December 8, 1980. Dick Faram - Mayor ">'" .... ATTEST: [ · Jeanette Moore - City Secreta~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA to• the Meeting January 26, 1981 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN PRE-COUNCIL 6:30 P.M. 1 . Discussion on the 1980 Audit Report 2. Discussion on check protector equipment 3. Discussion on ratification of Ordinance -'836, presented by Rex McEntire 4. Discussion on news article for Mid-Cities News on North Richland Hills progress in 1980. COUNCIL 7:30 P .M. 1 . Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. A..royal of Minutes of Resular Meeting, Januar 12, 1981 5. Al royal of Minutes of S.ecial Meetin., Januar 20, 1981 Consideration of re.uest of J. D. Griffith, 6632 Chilton Dr. , for variance from Building Code CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA the Meeting January 26, 1981 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. PS 80-60, Request of P. F. Carpenter, for replat of Lot 2A, Block A, Reddings Revision 8. Public Hearing - PZ 80-36, Request of Marvin Smith to rezone Lot 15R2, Block 1 , Richland Oaks Addition from 1F-12 to Local Retail _ 9. Consideration of Ordiance for PZ 80-36 -- — --�--- --- '0. Public Hearing - PZ 80-42, Request of Dr. James Waggener to rezone _ Tract 17D and a portion of Tract 16B, Abstract 1606, from 1F-7 to Local Retail 11 . Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 80-42 12. Public Hearing - PZ 00-44, Request of Bill Lightfoot & Doyle Compton to rezone a portion of Lot 2, Block 50, Nor' East Addition from Commercial to Commercial - Specific Use - Sale of Alcoholic Beverages _ 13. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 80-44 e CITY OF NORTH RfCHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA !-tJ,' the Meeti ng January 26, 1981 tat 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUf43ER ; ITEM ACTION TAKEN 14. Public Hearing - PZ 80-46, Request of Billy J. Ward to rezone a portion of Lot 6, Calloway Acres Addition, from Commercial to Multi-Family 15. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 80-46 16. PS 80-61, Request of Billy J. Ward _. for replat of Lot 16K, Calloway --~_.__.~-_.._~ I --LI. Acres Addition , Consideration of passage and ratification of passage of Ordinance #836 ;., - --- ..--- ... - 18. Consideration of Resolution to add partic'ular streets intersecting Precinct Line Road to the Federal Aid Urban System 19 . Consideration of the 1980 Audit Report for North Richland Hills 20. Consideration of Fos s i 1 Creek Park improvements ~ 21 . Consideration of Resolution for _0- certain people to sign checks '- Consideration of transfer of funds for check protector CITY OF NORTH RrCHLAND HILLS . e CITY COUNCIL AGENDA :-:u,~ the Meet i ng January 26, 1981 , at 7:30 p.m. t in the City Hallt 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUfttiER· ITEM ACTION TAKEN 23. Consideration of bids for closed circuit television 24. Adjournment -- --- --- - :~ - .~,....~. ...-' - 1..L ..I . < .---,.. J ~ t1INUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND' HILLS~ TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL) 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, JANUARY 12,1981 - 7:30 A.t1. [e 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Faram called the meeting to order January 12, 1981, a t 7: 30 P. ~1 . 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim Hood J. C. Hubbard Hiley Thomas Dave Freeman Shary1 Groves Staff Present: Chuck Hilliams Jeanette t100re Dennis Horvath Richard Albin Ne\'ls r·1ed i a: Robin Hatkins Kelvin Todd Toni Baird Joe Norton [- 3. Absent: Jinl Kenna Bob Brady The invocation was given by t,1r. Gordon Nelson. t1ayor ROLL CALL Councilmen Councilwoman Ci ty t1anager City Secretary Ass i stant Ci ty r·1anager City Engineer t·1 ide i tie 5 North Richland News North Richland News Ne\~s Tri bune Councilman Councilman INVOCATION 4. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve the minutes of the meeting of December 8, 1980. Motion carried 5-0e APPROVAL OF r11 r~UTES OF REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 8, 1980 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RESIGNATION OF COUNCILMAN BOB BRA[ PLACE SIX APPROVED 4a. Councilman Hubbard stated that due to urgency of item 21, he moved to move item 21 to item 4a. Councilman Thomas seconded the motion.- ~1oti on carri ed 5-0. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to accept the resignation of Councilman Bob Brady for reasons stated. Motion carried 5-0. !- January 12,196· Page 2 '5. The following proclamation was read: WHEREAS, the Fort Worth Christian School Cardinals, members of Texas Association of Private Schools will now be Texas Association of Private Schools State Champions. PROCLAt-1ATION - PRESENTED TO ~1RT WORTH CHRIST. ..J SCHOOL PROCLAIMING CARDINAL DAY JANUARY 12, 1981 WHEREAS, this team coached by Head Coach Randy Tribble was elected as Coach of the Year in Private School Conference, and; WHEREAS, Duck Brewer was nominated as Top Offensive Player of the Year, WHEREAS, this team is comprised of 29 fine young men, 3 Coaches, 3 Managers, 1 Trainer, 1 Superintendent and 1 Principal; Harold Wade, Superintendent Jerry Plemons, Principal Randy Tribble, Coach Garland Johnson, Coach Al Sexton, Coach Darlene Clayton, Manager Jimmy Bedgood, Manager Jeff Harrison, Manager Alan Kent, Trainer Phil Strzinek, Junior Aaron Woods, Junior Kevin Stone, Junior Wesley Scott, Junior link Davis, Junior ----~--~~~-~--~-_._-~,---~ ~-----~----------------- Jeff Markham, Sophomore Mike Boaz~ Sophomore Tim Roberts, Sophomore Brian Dempsey, Sophomore Dan St. Clair, Sophomore Robert Hart, Sophomore Jerry Petty, Sophomore Scott McGovern, Sophomore Duck Brewers Senior Mark Alexander, Senior Philip Taylor, Sénior Ronnie Beam, Sènior John Park, Senior Benny Perry, Senior Lee Hardin, Senior Brad Johnson, Senior ~-~-~~-----~~~---------~- Rick Thompson, Freshman Farland Clark, Freshman ïhomas McCafferty, Freshman --~---~-------~-----~- David Pearson, Junior Ricky Scott, Junior Greg St. Charles, Junior Dickie Rhoten, Junior Kevin Walter, Junior WHEREAS, it is the desire of. North Richland Hills to pay tribute to Coach and Team Members of Fort Worth Christian School. The Cardinals have outstanding sportsmanship and are recognized as the Texas Association of Private Schools State Champions for the State of Texas. NOL~J THEREFORE, I, Dick Faram, t'1ayor of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, do hereby proclaim this 12th day of January, 1981, as Cardinal Day. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, to be affixed this 12th day of January, A.D., 1981. Dick Faram~ Mayor I 6. Mr. Dale Jessup, 5309 Greenwood Way, appeared before the Ie Counci 1 · Mr. Jessup stated the reason for the variance was that he would like to have the variance to make an addition in the back of his home. Mr. Jessup stated the building would not be visable from the street. Mr. Jessup stated he would like for the Council to allow the variance to make the building frame. Mr. Jessup stated there was an existing 18x16 concrete slab at the back and he planned on putting in two windows and a door. There was no need for electricity because he would only be using it for storage. Mayor Faram stated Mr. Jessup had indicated his neighbor to the north had no objections to the building. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Jessup if there were any objections from any of the neighbors that he was aware of. Mr. Jessup stated to his knowledge there were no objections. The ones to the north were the only ones that would be able to see the building. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Jessup if in his opinion would there be any additional fire hazard involved by allowing this variance. , e r~r. Jessup repl ied no. ouncilman Wood asked if the whole building would be frame. Mr. Jessup stated yes, the reason for the size of the building was because of the existing slab. Councilman Freeman asked if anyone from the city had looked at this property. Mr. Williams stated he was not aware of anyone looking at it. Councilman Freeman stated that it appeared on the plat that when the building was extended it would be close to the set-back. Mr. Jessup stated there would be approximately four feet between the building and the fence. Councilman Freeman asked what the City Ordinance was concerning set-backs. Mr. Horvath stated the requirement was three feet. Co u n c i 1 rn a n I~~ 00 d ask e d i f the nor t h Vi a 11 0 f the ex i s tin 9 garage was frame~ e Mr. Jessup replied yes. January 12, 1981 Page 3 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF DALE JESSUP, 5309 GREEN\1JOOD ~~A y , FOR VARIANCE FROM BRICK ORDINANCE APPROVED January 12, 198 Page 4 Councilman Freeman asked if the building would be the same height as the existing home. r~r. Jessup stated the building would be lower than the existing garage. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas, to approve Mr. Jessup's request for a variance. Councilman Hubbard stated that the building would only be 88 feet over the ordinance requirement; however, it appeared to him that the ordinance needed to be corrected or the Council stop giving variances. Councilman Hubbard stated there were one to three requests for variances at every Council meeting. Councilman Hubbard stated he could foresee that everyone in the city would ask for a variance under the present ordinance. Councilman Hubbard stated he felt the request should be denied to everyone until the city plans were reviewed and change the ordinance or stick by it. Councilwoman Groves stated she concurred with Councilman Hubbard. Councilwoman Groves stated she could not see having the ordinance and making variances from it. Councilman Freeman stated in this particular instance it appeared that if Mr. Jessup was required to brick this addition he would have an architectural problem with the north side of his house being frame down to the point of his addition and it being brick. Councilman Hood stated that in this case he thought Councilman Freeman had a point. Councilman Wood stated that when there was a frame wall existing having to brick a portion of that structure would deter from the overall looks, it was one you had to make a decision on. Councilman Wood stated he hoped the Council would not see many more variances~ Mayor Faram stated he thought the 200 square feet was a little ridiculous. ~1ayor Faram stated he concurred with Councilmen Freeman and Wood, it would be ridiculous to require Mr. Jessup to brick this building@ Mayor Faram .stated he would like to see the ordinance re-valuated., Councilman Hubbard moved to postpone action of this request until next Council meeting. Motion dies for the lack of a second. Mayor Faram called for a vote on the original motion. Original motion carried 3-2; Councilmen Wood, Freeman and Tholnas, voting for; Councilman Hubbard and Councilwoman Groves voting against. e 7. Mr. R. B. Vension representing Mr. J. D. Griffith, appeared before the Counciì. Mr. Vension stated they got a permit to build a two-story triple car garage. They were red-tagged because it was not 75% masonry. Î"1r. Vension stated all the walls, except the very front, were ei ght foot masonry. ~1r. Vens i on stated the building was built into a hill. The structure above ground was frame. The only part on the bottom that was not masonry was the front which would be four sections about a foot apart where the three garage doors were. r,1ayor Faram asked Mr. Vension if he was saying everything below was frame except the garage doors. Mr. Vension stated everything was frame on the second story. Mayor Faram asked if this was an existing building. Mr. Vension stated yes. Councilman Freeman asked the City Attorney if the Council was taking into consideration the portion above ground as far as the intent of the existing ordinance and as far as fire protection was concerned. e Mr. McEntire stated the Council was taking into consideration the outside walls of the entire building. Mr. McEntire stated the walls did not meet the 75% masonry requirement. Councilwoman Groves stated the upper story was all fràme and since that was where the ground was, that was where all the weeds and grass was. Councilwoman Groves stated she felt it would be a fire hazard. Mr. Vension stated the land sloped and there could be as much as three feet of the bottom structure across the back above the ground~ Mr. Vension stated when they got the permit originally the second story vias allo\~ed to be fY'ame. Councilman Freeman asked how the building permit was issued since the building did not conform with the ordinancee Mr. McEntire stated when the permit was issued it showed to be 75% brick.. Councilman Freeman asked if a drawing was submitted when the permit was obtained. e Mr. Horvath stated the only thing that was submitted was a drawing. The permit was issued based on the drawing. January 12, 1981 Page 5 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF J. D. GRIFFITH, 6632 . CHILTON ~ FOR V ARIANCEFRO~·1 BRICK ORDINANCE POSTPONED Mayor Faram stated it was his understanding the property had not been platted and it was his understanding the property must be platted before a permit could be issued. Mr. Horvath stated the property had not been platted. Mr. J. D. Griffith appeared before the Council. Mr. Griffith stated the property was suppose to be platted. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to postpone action on this request until such time the City Staff could verify platting and also before presented again have some type of elevation. Motion carried 4-1; Councilmen Freeman, Wood, Thomas and Councilwoman Groves voting for; Councilman Hubbard voting against. 8. Mr. Paul Schmidt, 4716 Lariat Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Schmidt stated his request was to drill a well for watering his yard. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Schmidt if he was aware the depth of the well could only be 200 feet and not for human consumption. Mr. Schmidt stated he was aware of these requirements. Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve Mr. Schmidt1s request to drill a well. Motion carried 5-0. 9. Mrs~ Beverly Riley, Chairman, Cable TV Advisory Committee for North Richland Hills, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Riley stated they were before the Council tonight to submit recommendations the Advisory Committee felt would help the City to promote citizen participation in Local Government and better understanding of other city services and programs. Mrs. Riley introduced Dr. Dan Echols of Tarrant County Junior College. r~1rs. Riley stated that Dr. Echols had researched other cities who had used Cable TV to their advantage. Dr. Dan Echols, 5016 Nevada Trail, member of North Richland Hills Cable Advisory Committee. January 12; 1981- Page 6 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF PAUL SCHMIDT, 4716 LARIAT DRIVE, TO DRILL A WELL APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF CO~,1MUNITY CABLE ADVISORY PANEL ON USE OF FRANCHISE FEE - PRESENTED BY DAN ECHOLS POSTPONED e Dr. Echols stated that at the meeting of the Cable Advisory Committee they had been discussing some needs that needed to be addressed in order to properly regulate and utilize the Cable TV for the benefit of North Richland Hills and its citizens. Dr. Echols stated there were several things that needed to be considered. Dr. Echols stated one thing that needed to be done was to consider the development of a municipal service, video service which would be similar to those which had been utilized in other cities, one of which was Madison,Wisconsin and the other was Redding, Pennsylvania. Dr. Echols stated he visited both of the systems and was particularly impressed with the way the municipal service was oper~ted in Madison, Wisconsin. e Dr. Echols stated he realized North Richland Hills was not nearly as big as Madison, but the principles that were involved are the same as what is needed to be considered here. Dr. Echols stated the municipal video service was a function of the Madison Library. Dr. Echols stated it consisted of four functions; promote the public use of Cable TV by encouraging community participation in and developing procedures for the use of public and educational access channels; and, consulting with and advising community organizations; provide technical assistance and information to city personnel, the ~·1ayor, the Common Council and the public; provide resources and technical information to city departments and the audio-visual programming and production review team; provide staff support, recommendations, clerical and informational assistance to the Cable Television Program Advisory Council; supervise the administration of city 12, \".Jhich was the name of the municipal channel, by providing program production, acquiring and maintaining equipment, setting policy and procedures, maintaining a regular program schedule. Dr. Echols showed a tape at this point of the meeting. Dr. Echols stated this channel was currently available to the City, provided by Black Hawk Cable TV Company. They also provide channels fo}~ educational use and community access. Dr. Echols stated that in the early stages of the franchise he expected that a great deal of the support that would be needed for this type of thing would be provided by the Cable Company and would require relatively little expenditures of the City, but as the demand increased on the Cable Company for operation 'of their equipment to provide the community access that was going to be available less and less of it would be available to the city, it would require the city to stand on its own feet to provide these services~ Dr~ Echols e January 12, 1981 Page 7 stated the city v/ould have to buy more equipment to develop this and it would have to be under· the direction of some city agency in order to be a liable operation. Dr. Echols stated the Committee's proposal was that the Council consider very carefully the possibility of utilizing part of the franchise fee, if that was their desire, to provide these kind of services to the citizens of North Richland Hills. Mayor Faram asked Dr. Echols what kind of equipment would be purchased. Dr. Echols stated a video tape recorder, some video cameras, audio recording equipment and eventually some editing equipment in order to edit the tapes. Dr. Echols stated some other uses of this equipment which would help to justify the expenditures would be the production of the matèrials to be uséd in the training of city departments, such as, the Fire Depart~ent, Police Department and Election Judges. Dr. Echols stated one of the uses would be programming for senior citizens. Mayor Faram stated he had heard this discussed back and forth and personally had some real problems with it. One was where a city government or any kind of government putting out information. It seemed to him that would be very hard to develop any kind of rules or criteria by which information was totally neutral, completely divorced from politics. Mayor Faram stated that is why we have the free press, they could sit and interpret what happens and he could tell it in a different way, he would tell it as the position of being Mayor of North Richland Hills. Mayor Faram stated he felt it would be very touchy ground as far as he was personally concerned. When you start editing and preparing the tapes in which you are going to have for public release and the open Council meeting, right now, unless some stringent rules could be developed, he was personally having a real hard problem v,¡ith the city government of North Richland Hills.getting into the information business. Mayor Faram stated he certainly wanted an informed public, but, was having a hard time thinking that as an amateur politician he could screen information and go over the airways because it was subject to criticism. January 12,- 1981 ~ Page 8 e Dr. Echols stated he did not think Mayor Faram fully understood exactly how the process took place. Dr. Echols stated this information was not released to the citizens. The citizens were involved in asking questions of the city officials. The city officials reply to the questions and help explain them. Dr. Echols stated it was not a structure type brainwashing situation. t1ayor Faram stated he had a big problem Y/ith this until he could see some very strict rules that governed the government itself. Dr. Echols stated the committee wanted to see the Council sessions televised then the citizens could draw their own conclusions. Mayor Faram stated he would personally have a hard time trying to chair a meeting of this type. ~1ayor Faram stated his personal feeling was that if people were interested enough in government there was news media to find an unbiased source. e Councilman Wood stated he felt the city was faced with a change in times and in time all city functions would be on Cable TV. Councilman Wood stated the Cable TV Advisory Committee had three purposes in mind in this presentation. Councilman Wood stated the Committee was proposing to the Council that they authorize the Cable Advisory Committee, or select a citizens committee, to help establish the policy and procedures to the public governmental channels and the reason he said public was the Cable company already had advised the Committee that unless some rather firm, defined written policies and procedures were established do not take it because you would see some things you did not want to see. Councilman Wood stated the Advisory Committee needed to have additional citizenry appointed by them or the Council; Councilman Wood stated that was number one. Councilman Wood stated item two, the Committee was asking for consideration to designate a portion of the franchise fee to promote the public and/or governmental excess channels because no matter what is done it was going to wind up with public information, which if nothing else would be audio visual tapes~ Councilman Wood stated the contract called for the company to furnish terrninals and outlets, that meant a camera and a plug in the wall. Councilman Wood stated that as far as the L i brar'y, that fneant you caul d rent or purchase tape program~~ The Library could run a programe The Recreation Center could run a tape program~ Eventually you would see on cable, credit courses. Councilman Wood stated the issue must be faced shortly and policies and procedures needed to be drawn up. e January 12, 1981 Page 9 Councilman Wood stated the third and most important item was the Council authorizing the Cable Advisory Committee to jointly cooperate with the adjoining cities, counties and school districts, because of the duplicating process. The Hurst Library had one on the most amazing programs for them to be on the air the short length of time in the area. Councilman Wood stated it would be foolish to duplicate their effort_ Councilman Wood stated this would require the city to either rent Hurst's tapes or being able to switch over and put it into North Richland Hills. Councilman Wood stated his proposal to the Council would be for the Council and the Cable TV Advisory Committee to have a joint work sessionw Councilman Freeman asked how much money was being discussed. Dr. Echols stated he thought the dollars should be considered to relate to what was coming in from the cable franchise. Councilman Freeman asked what the round figures would be to get the program started. Dr. Echols stated they propose that a percentage of the Cable franchise be dedicated, which would be very, very small in the early years and simply bank that away in order to utilize it. The Council would authorize the use of the money at the appropriate time. Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Williams what he thought the franchise fee would be in two or three years. Mr. Williams stated he did not know at this time. Councilman Wood stated that at the present time, it was too early to have any estimates. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to postpone action on this request until such time that a joint session with the Advisory Committee and the Council could be scheduled. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Faram advised Councilman Wood to set-up the meeting~ Mayor Faram called a ten minute recess~ r1ayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council Members and Staff were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. January 12, 1981 Page 10 RECESS BACK TO ORDER 10. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval, subject to the Engineers· comments and covenant being signed for pro rata., e Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve PS 80-57. Motion carried 5-0. 11. Mayor Faram advised the Cóuncil the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval. Counc i 1 man Hubba rd moved, seconded by Counci 1 man Freenlan, to approve PS 80-59. Motion carried 5-0. 12. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning had recommended approval subject to Engineer's comments and the drainage being resolved. Mayor Faram asked if all the requirements had been resolved. Mre Horvath stated there was a letter from the owner of the property agreeing to the drainage requirements. e Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve PS 80-63. Councilman Wood stated he would question a letter on file., If the property was sold a letter might not be sufficient. City Attorney t~cEntire stated a covenant could be signed. Counci lman Hubbard anlended hi s rnoti on, seconded by Counci lman Freeman, to approve subject to a covenant being signed on the drainagee Amended motion carried 5-0. 13. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to approve the low bid of Tarrant Electric Corporation in the amount of $37,060.00~ t~otion carried 5-0~ 1 4 . C i t Y f'1 a nag e r ~.J i 11 i a iTl sad vis e d the Co U n c 'f 1 0 n 1 yon e bid t" e c e i ve d f 0 Y' the sur p 1 us par k pro p e (' t Y and the Staff recommended rejecting the bid. Counci 1 man Freeman moved, seconded by' Coune i 1 man Hubba reI, e to y'eject the bid of Dale Hill Investment Compòny. Motion carried 5-0ø January 12, 1981 Page 11 PS 80-57, REQUEST OF FORREST JOHNSON, FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, HEWITT ESTATES APPROVED PS 80-59, REQUEST OF CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOR REPLAT OF HOLIDAY NORTH, SECTION 7 APPROVED PS 80-63, REQUEST OF COLLEGE HILL CHURCH FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS A & B, BLOCK 28, COLLEGE HILL ADDITIOt~ APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR LIGHT FIXTURES AT RICHFIELD PARK APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR SURPLUS Pt\RK PROPERTY REJECTED ---_.~_.- January 12, 19B1 Page 12 City Manager Williams stated Allen Bronstad had checked the figures. CONSIDERATION OF PAYr~ENT TO SHARR\.;· ELECTRIC, INC.~ I N THE A~,10UN' F $3,199.84 FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS APPROVED 15. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve payment to Sharrock Electric in the amount of $3,199.84. ( \ . Councilman Freeman asked if the estimate had been checked~ Councilman Wood asked the status on the installation of the signals. Mr. Williams stated it was a little behind schedule because of not being able to get the poles. Mr. Horvath stated the poles were in place. Motion carried 5-0. Councilman Wood asked if this would be the final contract. CONSIDERATION OF PAYMENT TO CITY OF HURST IN THE Ar·10UNT OF $6,603.. f<: FOR IMPROVEMENT Tt PRECINCT LINE ROI[\~'· APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ,. APPROVE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 81- 16. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve payment to the City of Hurst in the amount of $6~603.00. Motion carried 5-0. 17. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve Resolution No. 81-1, funding to be taken from the Hotel/t1otel Tax. tfl¡ayor Fa rams"ep 1 i ed no p Motion carried 5-0e Mayor Faram appointed Councilmen Wood and Freeman and Ci ty r~anager Chuck ~~i 11 i arTIS to a commi ttee to negoti ate the contract. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN \~ITH HAYNE H. SNYDER & ASSOCIATE APPROVED 18. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve the contract with Wayne M. Snyder & Associates subject to a finalization by a committee~ Motion carried 5-0e Motion carried 5-0~ CONSIDERATIon OF RESOLUTION FOR THE POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF CITY PLANNING POSTPONED 19. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to postpone action on this item~ .. ! , \.- 20~ (. e -ATTEST: e Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to a p pro v e 0 r din a nee No. 866 ~ a p poi n tin 9 r',1 r.. C h a r 1 e s 0\'1/ en, ~Jess Nelson and Cliff Griffith to the Board of Equalization for 1981.. Motion carried 5-0. 21 .. This item heard as item 4a. 22.. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of January 12, 1981. January 12, 1981 Page 13 APPOINTt;1ENT OF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FOR 1981 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 866 CONSIDERATION OF RESIGNATION OF BOB BRADY, PLACE SIX APPROVED ADJOURN~·1ENT Dick Faram, Mayor Jeanette ~;1oore, Ci ty Secretary .. e - MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF rJORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 !JORTHEAST LOOP 820, JANUARY 20, 19.81 - 7: 00 P. r',1 If 1. Mayor Faram called the special meeting to order January 20,1981, at 7:00 P.f':l. f~' c __..."".) CALL TO ORDER 2. Present: Dick Faram r'1ayor ROLL CALL Jim Kenna Jim l'Jood Councilmen J. C. Hubbard Sharyl Groves Councilwoman Staff: Chuck t'Ji 11 i ams Ci ty t..1anager Jeanette ~1oore City Secretary Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Rex r"1cEnti re City Attorney Absent: Dave Freeman Councilman ~Jiley Thomas Councilman 3. At 7:10 P.M., Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve Ordinance No. 867. (H. C. Ordinance #1040) Motion carried 4-0. 4. At 7:15 P.t1., Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Ordinance 868. (H. C. Ordinance #1041) Motion carried 4-0. 5. f'1ayor Faram adjourned the meeting of January 20, 1981. ORDINANCE DEANNEXATING CERTAI~ PROPERTY TO HAL TOr-1 C I TV ORDINANCE NO. 867 APPROVED ORDINJ.\NCE CORRECTI~H BOUNDARY LINES WITH HAL TO~·1 CITY ORDINAnCE NO. 868 ÃPPRO\jED ADJOURNt-1ENT Dick Faram, t!layor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary . . L . 1.... Y"1 U -- . ... \/ ') :: 'ì¡ q ,~)J -I, ;- '- ,. " ì: 2 e~ 1 ng ------.::!. ~o/-. ' '.. ,: v , - - ¡ t,/y- t/. lr¡. J -~'-/-.-' ' ~ \..... " r'~ut r~'r~ ~ 0 I , t J.0 '- ,\ . "I , t --¡ , 1. I Disçussion on the 1980 Audit Report /......~ .< ' /., / -t'II~/ h:~. 0 f&~' /i~... 'S- () .i-j, f' ,or Discussion on check protector 2. ! ¡ 1 3 » 1 i i } ¡ I f ! j } 4. --- " ~?7[C2- ~I ---I J I ì I /·l~· -#/?- f 1- . .'.'! ( I í -a~ ,rß! fj, .." ..-P.r'" f~. ..~~,f7.':.. , at 7: 30 ITE~1 . PRE-COUNCIL 6 : 30 P. f'1 . 1/ ~ ~.,;,.j;#It ð....:.c:,. 't ~" I 0 . .1,~~, -" (" r-;;-..,,1 j/ t'! " -t:H! ~{,\,w' ':A... . AGEnD.4 p..¡¡l. , i rt 'th e City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop ,-.. ~, ,... Ö¿J.. !\CTION TAKEN .r'.... .~~"....,..~..::'~.,. / ! It.;..-'" / ~-.~.._..__..~...._,. .. I . i / .Jßµ-t=IÞ I (; _If " _____ .~___ I . +:~ ~téP··µ~- I -¡ equipment 6 ; SlJ +0 7/~ /1·) i') Discussion on ratification of Ordinance #836, presented by R ex r'~cEnt ire r¡ i-: r-J ' / ./'''\ Ýt Á -" ,/ I D /!' D r f v' , Discussion on news article for ~¡1-i d- Ci ties f':e'/Js on No r~th Ri ch 1 and i , ¡ } i ¡ 1.1·~ èa 11 , i ~ I ¡ Í '- 3. I Invocation f ; I ; 1 ----L- _J __~ A rn r 0 ':!2:..L 0 f ì·! i nut e S 0 f R~! L! ì a r _ ___---1-----'.:.~2 2'-.i n '-1 2-'J an U ë\ IY 1 2, .1 9 r~ ~----.-___L J I c , ----~..-¡ J,\,oprovi11 of Hinutes of Sp2cia1 -- i-=---- .L ¡. :~': t i n.3, ,J an u a Y'Y 20, 1 931 ! I i I 2 . i . t ------i- f I , --- to 0 ~"d e Y" t f . t i . Roll Call I ---.....,..~-- .-- -- -- ...-...__._._-----.--------...,..---~--- --------........--.-_~--.......- --------..---- -..-.--...-.-------......----- ..-----~ -- ·ft- -Id :-" '-' -~.. trte I~ . ,-.J CITY OF NORTH RICHLAnO HILLS C ITY COU~!C IL Þ-.GENCA M::et i n-g J an u ~ '(Y r)r II t') -'-- , 198"1 } n th e c .¡ t y H a 11) 7 2 J 1 N ~ [ · 82J. Loop at 7:30 µ ..n. ) ..¿O -.e c: ., Æ. · ,1-¿4< I Consideration of Ordiance for ¡J./.? ~ ·.t',-,t,~,~' - J>1.L! A:1f.Í2~;,4./ ~ P7 80- 36 '\ -.... ; ;"c_~"..._ ~<. ,- i··" ì ,f'.- " - ~liC Hearinq - PI 80-42, Requ~st \ I:L.LI¿·(..~ -'1/?t~,//, ¿va.-··:'- ;:' ¿i./~, . l~ I En., ~'ð I I::> ,., ~ ..., '" ., 'J" '" I " /' 1., . <'7 - ¡I') II / ( ..' __---1 0 ,) ¡. ,J a¡¡I~S 'ie. C >i ,::, I':. ! to rc La:l '- 1.1} A " 'L~A,..L- - /J...uo ~ !ltrl.4~t, ¥ - 8" v .¡. c.-.£&.!.' . 1... I - ------r~ ! Tract 170 and a portion of Tract lóf~, t¥ljJð.Ud.. þ:(I/(.~(...:.t_.,} ,J Ji.' ;' · Þ.bs tr<3.ct. 1605, -rro!n 1 f-- 7 to Local ..__.,,!.!,g.u../ ,.,;,~-<-; (" .Þ.~(. h a'.-, · A ,'¿, ( Retai'l ! d'~ð--Lý,.[,'·~ (..~ ! í . \ f r ~! U ~."t¡) t' 0 I ~?~" I I .----.""\ ¡ ." r- f @- ~ & f I ITEf'} f J i -,,; ,. ( ,I"": ACTION Tr-\~<EN PS 30-60, Request of P. F. Carpenter, for replat of Lot 2A, Block A, Reddings Revision ~:l , I ~ ~",,:~~, ..l,ft#~' . t~-,Ú-(l.)~ .t,.o, ' , I ....,,"'.... ,,: "'. ,/ .- ¿<... ,.,.) , , . .,;,.., ..." .'L. r .~. - ..... Publ ic Hearing - PZ 80-36, Request of f':1arvin Smith to rezone Lot 15R2) Block 1, Richland Oaks Addition from IF-12 to Local Retail ~ r \ Consideration of Ordinance foy" PI 80-42 i \ ¡ B 1 G .-~_~< 5 ~22-.ll~!" E é~ s t þ, d d i t i 0 :1 f Y' 0 ri1 f ¡ ---.------r----.-.-------~-,.----------., --- ---t-u-~,:~-~-;~ '/\1 .~~~,~~ ~ /-\:'¡~;~~;;¡ C -r·-------------------·:---- ¡ ,··--:----·--~-··------'--r----·--·-----·-------·-- I i ~2T-~~f~,~-~~~ ~ 1 i ~~¿r õ~~j i¡~~~~~ - f.o r --·~~~=ll~;~Z~~~:::~¡:,"2~<~::~~~~,-':.,-== _._¡.__.~ ' ¡tJ ,¿ -.-.~"-"'---~----.------ \.../ : I '---1- i I ~ ---.---L Hearing - PI 80-44, Request Bill Lightfoot & Doyle Compton to rezone a portion of Lot 2, .~----..-..-------~--.,-..~-- .._-~--- ----,---- . .J...__--..------.----...---.--------~----~ ------..-..------ . .. " . CITY OF NORTH R!CHLAND HILLS CITY canne IL ~/~E~~U.~ > - , the >~~9t i r:] J a n ~.j :: '(' y r> ,.. ~~') ~ 1 ~I .~.~ ! ~t 7 ~ 30 p . ~. ) i ~ tf1 e c¡ 'C.Y Hall, 730 1 :i.E. Loop 820. ITE,\1 _~L !\CTIO;¡ T.AKEN Public Hearing - PZ 80-46, Request of 8 i 11..y J. \.! a r'd tor e Z 0 n e a p \) r~ t ion of Lot 6, Calloway Acres Addition, from Commerc i a 1 to f-'1u 1 t ì - Fainì 1 y l I Consideration j PZ 80-46 ./ ~i / l(#' ¿.J) . '} '1.... '\ I,", .. ~ _L~'~.l" ~..~ ~ ~-~~~-.i~ .: oL. 1'( /,;-/J- $,) J . / ~"6 Consid2rùtion of passage and __I*}(c.1t~,¿,J~ j(P/IVt)O,-/:icS} C:7~, "" ' . ,... . t · ,... . .'" 0 I·· }. .": ,,\. f I f ~ /1 ~ \ ;... \ h . _~I1Tlca ìon OT pCì.SSJq2 0'1 {"C!lna.nCt~ ! ~·ýl:.e.c:~'\~af.~j· ~ L/V~ _._ ,<c/:·. f~C;\. _ I 36 - --------T r- d/þ - I _.'._1 - - ¡- .f;_ i Consideration-;f Res~~t~~~ a~!d' --=1," ----------~-_.-'-_. .~ 1 P a (" tic u 1 êt r s~ (e e"t S 'j n t e,"( see tin ~~ r t I ---. Precinct Line ROJd to the Fe¿?ral I I __I PS 80-61, Request of Billy J. Ward for replat of Lot 16K, Calloway Acres ,l\dd-ition ---.- ---------......-. Aid Svst2m -------~--- ------.-..,...-.- - -'--"'" ~..__.-- -'--.,---- .-.---- _._.....----_..._-----_._--.~-_.........~--~-_.._-----_.._- .----.-- .... .---- -.-----.------..-.--....~-....~-.--- '. ..-.... .-- --.-.~.._. -'-~_'__..._·____-__.___.a__--_.,..._________.._ _...._......__.-._._.._...._ ,-~~,,_:: .""..:.._-,,~,...._.:.,.,--_.......__..._... ---..------..--- ------..-._~- ¡ ~-:---__t___--- ~--------- ----__~-~t: ...,' ;~:~7=----~=~-~~=-===--------.------ CITY OF NORTH RTCHL,;~~O HILLS CITY COU ¡·!C I L f\G Et"l C.A J an \Jêt r"'''/ ,-) r LO, 1931 · . . Î' ,. , t 1 ., 1 - 1", r, 1 't r , 0 P '/ .", 1 n ,{~~18 \~ '·C.Y :-13.1 ) ¡.j'.,;. n It t. LCO: u_'J. , at 7: 30 p.m. !J ;-U', , the Meet; fHl -- .... bl Ü I Adjournment I TEf/t i ~__t . ACTiON Tr\KCN Consideration of bids for closed circuit televi~ion , I ¡ 1 L I I ! .{ ( r t , I __J ì ! \ I r- J ( -l. I r I ! t 1. . , i I ~ --------- -----. . i 1 .- t - '--T . \ Î ---- ~-..~--------------'_.---*--' ------.......-_.------~._---~. ì ! ---I t i J 1 t h--1---. I J- L ! 1 1 .....,.---____.._~.---~---.---.-------'-.--------..-..-----------.-.----__f .._. ._~,._.._. _.-_.___---.-------.-------.------- ------------ \ -~--..~---...--------------'-- _____~_..J_ ._._____~_.__..__.__._._______.._ ....--.----.............-..-.....--.-.----... ---.-..--- -....-. -.---: .-------.-. ."-- ._'-- ..--._.----- -_. --.---..----...-- -.-.-.----..--...--- ---:--------...- t _______. ___. ~-__..___._)O____..._._____ ___.___-_..-.~____.___ _.... . ....._____~.....-,.--- -____-_-_ '"_____~~_c___--__ ~ -~......._...-~ --,---_._._-_...~------_...- .------.------.- -'" ----~-_#._-- ; . . . -..---- .-...-,.-.-- -¿, ._---_....--- -_.-.... - _._>-~.-...~ .--.---------.'-'.. ----..--..-..--- .~.- ~- -----..- .--.--..----------.. .--------...-'" ,-.--._-- ! ___.___.~__-----.---------~..- ..._-_i_._._____._.__.__.._._.___~_._.._.___.______·_,-----------..--- - ! --' ------;-._- --- ¡ ----1--- ! ------·í i __--1-_____ i i -~-i t -----------·-----~·--f--·-------·--- I ! -_._-----...-----_...--......_-~_.__._-_._----- ì i T ¡ I. e e e ~c '...........,,-..J t1INUTES OF THE SPECIAL t·1EETING OF THE ~A_/ t(_ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND i ) ~ ( HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 )..J-vJ!r'}-(~ NORTHEAST LOOP 820, JANUARY 20, 1981 - 7:00 P.~. ~- 1. r~ayor Faram called the special meeting to order January 20,1981, at 7:00 P.t-1. CALL TO ORDER 2. Present: Dick Faram t'1ayor ROLL CALL Jim Kenna Jim t:·Jood Councilmen J. C. Hubbard Sharyl Groves Councilwoman Staff: Chuck Hilliams Ci ty t:1anager Jeanette t100re City Secretary Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Rex f"1cEnti re City Attorney Absent: Dave Freeman Councilman Wiley Thomas Councilman 3. At 7:10 p.r:1., Councilman Hood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve Ordinance No. 867. (H. C. Ordinance #1040) Motion carried 4-0. 4. At 7:15 P.t1., Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Ordinance 868. (H. C. Ordinance #1041) Motion carried 4-0. 5. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of January 20, 1981. Dick Faram, t1ayor ATTEST: Jeanette t'·1oore, City Secretar.y ORDINANCE DEANNEXATING CERTAIN PROPERTY TO HAL TO~1 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 867 APPROVED ORDINANCE CORRECTING BOUNDARY LINES WITH HALTO~·1 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 868 APPROVED ADJOURNr.1ENT r:- r1INUTES OF THE REGULAR r·1EETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS~ TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, JANUARY 12,1981 - 7:30 A.t·1. [~e 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order January 12, 1981, a t 7: 30 P. t1 . 2. Present: Dick Faram Jim \~ood J. C. Hubbard Hiley Thomas Dave Freeman Sharyl Groves Staff Present: Chuck Hi1liams Jeanette t100re Dennis Horvath Richard Albin N e\^JS r·1ed i a : Robi n t~atki ns Kelvin Todd Toni Baird Joe Norton le 3. Absent: Jim Kenna Bob Brady The invocation was given by t,1r. Gordon r~elson. CALL TO ORDER r1ayor ROLL CALL Councilmen Councilwoman Ci ty t1anager City Secretary Assistant City Manager City Engineer t,1 i d C i tie s North Richland News North Richland News Ne\~s Tri bune Councilman Councilman INVOCATION APPROVAL OF r·1It~UTES OF REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 8, 1980 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RESIGNATION OF COUNCILMAN BOB BRAD PLACE SIX APPROVED 4. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve the minutes of the meeting of December 8, 1980. Motion carried 5-0. 4a. Councilman Hubbard stated that due to urgency of item 21, he moved to move item 21 to item 4a. Councilman Thomas seconded the motion. ~1otion carried 5-0. Counci 1 man Hubbard moved, seconded by Counci 1 man t.Jood, to accept the resignation of Councilman Bob Brady for reasons stated. Motion carried 5-0. I Ie January 12} 1981 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Fort Worth Christian School Cardinals, members of Texas Association of Private Schools will now be Texas Association of Private Sch~ols State Champions. PROCLAt·1ATION - PRESE~¿TED TO r-~RT vJORTH {J-IR I ST 1. .. I SCHOOL PROCLAIMING CARDINAL DAY JANUARY 12, 1981 5. The following proclamation was read: WHEREAS, this team coached by Head Coach Randy Tribble was elected as Coach of the Year in Private School Conference, and; WHEREAS, Duck Brewer was nominated as Top Offensive Player of the Year, WHEREAS, this team is comprised of 29 fine young men, 3 Coaches, 3 Managers, 1 Trainer, 1 Superintendent and 1 Principal; Harold Wade, Superintendent Jerry Plemons, Principal Randy Tribble, Coach Garland Johnson, Coach Al Sexton, Coach Darlene Clayton, Manager Jimmy Bedgood, Manager Jeff Harrison, Manager Alan Kent, Trainer Phil Strzinek, Junior Aaron Woods, Junior Kevin Stone, Junior Wesley Scott, Junior Link Davis, Junior - ... - - .... - - .... ... - ... ... - ..... -... .. - - ,- - - ~ -~-------~-------~--~-~- Jeff Markham, Sophomore Mike Boaz: Sophomore Tim Roberts, Sophomore Brian Dempsey, Sophomore Dan St. Clair, Sophomore Robert Hart, Sophomore Jerry Petty, Sophomore Scott McGovern, Sophomore Duck Brewer! Senior Mark Alexander, Senior Philip Taylor, Sé'nior Ronnie Beam, Sènior John Park, Senior Benny Perry, Senior Lee Hardin, Senior Brad Johnson, Senior -------~----~--~~----~~~- Rick Thompson, Freshman Farland Clark, Freshman Thomas McCafferty, Freshman --~----~~------------- David Pearson, Junior Ricky Scott, Junior Greg St. Charles, Junior Dickie Rhoten, Junior Kevin Walter, Junior WHEREAS, it is the desire of North Richland Hills to pay tribute to Coach and Team Members of Fort Worth Christian School. The Cardinals have outstanding sportsmanship and are recognized as the Texas Association of Private Schools State Champions for the State of Texas. NOW THEREFORE, I, Dick Faram, Mayor of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, do hereby proclaim this 12th day of January, 1981, as Cardinal Day. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, to be affixed this 12th day of January, A. D., 1981. Dick Faram, Mayor Ie 6. Mr. Dale Jessup. 5309 Greenwood Way, appeared before the Council. Mr. Jessup stated the reason for the variance was that he would like to have the variance to make an addition in the back of his home. Mr. Jessup stated the building would not be visable from the street. Mr. Jessup stated he would like for the Council to allow the variance to make the building frame. Mr. Jessup stated there was an existing 18x16 concrete slab at the back and he planned on putting in two windows and a door. There was no need for electricity because he would only be using it for storage. Mayor Faram stated Mr. Jessup had indicated his neighbor to the north had no objections to the building. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Jessup if there were any objections from any of the neighbors that he was aware of. Mr. Jessup stated to his knowledge there were no objections. The ones to the north were the only ones that would be able to see the bUilding. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Jessup if in his oplnlon would there be any additional fire hazard involved by allowing this variance. 4IÞ Mr. Jessup replied no. ouncilman Wood asked if the whole building would be frame. Ie Mr. Jessup stated yes, the reason for the size of the building was because of the existing slab. Councilman Freeman asked if anyone from the city had looked at this property. Mr. Williams stated he was not aware of anyone looking at it. Councilman Freeman stated that it appeared on the plat that when the building was extended it would be close to the set-back. Mr. Jessup stated there would be approximately four feet between the building and the fence. Councilman Freeman asked what the City Ordinance was concerning set-backs. Mr~ Horvath stated the requirement was three feet~ Councilman Wood asked if the north wall of the existing garage was frame. Mr. Jessup replied yes~ January 12, 1981 Page 3 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF DALE JESSUP, 5309 GREENvJOOD t~A y , FOR VARIANCE FROM BRICK ORDINANCE APPROVED January 12, 198J Page 4 Councilman Freeman asked if the building would be the same height as the existing home. r~r. Jessup stated the building would be lower than the existing garage. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas, to approve Mr. Jessup's request for a variance. Councilman Hubbard stated that the building would only be 88 feet over the ordinance requirement; however~ it appeared to him that the ordinance needed to be corrected or the Council stop giving variances. Councilman Hubbard stated there were one to three requests for variances at every Council meeting. Councilman Hubbard stated he could foresee that everyone in the city would ask for a variance under the present ordinance. Councilman Hubbard stated he felt the request should be denied to everyone until the city plans were reviewed and change the ordinance or stick by it. Councilwoman Groves stated she concurred with Councilman Hubbard. Councilwoman Groves stated she could not see having the ordinance and making variances from it. Councilman Freeman stated in this particular instance it appeared that if Mr. Jessup was required to brick this addition he would have an ~rchitectural problem with the north side of his house being frame down to the point of his addition and it being brick. ¡ ,. Councilman Wood stated that in this case he thought Councilman Freeman had a point. Councilman Wood stated that when there was a frame wall existing having to brick a portion of that structure would deter from the overall looks, it was one you had to make a decision on. Councilman Wood stated he hoped the Council would not see many more variances. Mayor Faram stated he thought the 200 square feet was a little ridiculous~ Mayor Faram stated he concurred with Councilmen Freeman and Wood, it would be ridiculous to require Mr. Jessup to brick this building. Mayor Faram .stated he would like to see the ordinance re-valuated., Councilman Hubbard moved to postpone action of this request until next Council meeting. Motion dies for the lack of a second. Mayor Faram called for a vote on the original motion. Original motion carried 3-2; Councilmen l~ood, Freeman and Thomas, voting for; Council!nan Hubbard and Councilwoman Groves voting against~ - 7. Mr. R. B. Vension representing Mr. J. D. Griffith, appeared before the Council. Mr. Vension stated they got a permit to build a two-story triple car garage. They were red-tagged because it was not 75% masonry_ Mr. Vension stated all the walls, except the very front, were eight foot masonry. Mr. Vension stated the building was built into a hill. The structure above ground was frame. The only part on the bottom that was not masonry was the front which would be four sections about a foot apart where the three garage.doors were. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Vension if he was saying everything below was frame except the garage doors. Mr. Vension stated everything was frame on the second story. Mayor Faram asked if this was an existing building. Mr. Vension stated yes. Councilman Freeman asked the City Attorney if the Council was taking into consideration the portion above ground as far as the intent of the existing ordinance and as far as fire protection was concerned. e Mr. McEntire stated the Council was taking into consideration the outside walls of the entire building. Mr. McEntire stated the walls d-id not meet the 75% masonry requirement. Councilwoman Groves stated the upper story was all frame and since that was where the ground was, that was where all the weeds and grass was. Councilwoman Groves stated she felt it would be a fire hazard~ Mr. Vension stated the land sloped and there could be as much as three feet of the bottom structure across the back above the groundÞ Mr. Vension stated when they got the permit originally the second story was allo\~ed to be frame. Councilman Freeman asked how the building permit was issued since the building did not conform with the ordinance. Mr. McEntire stated when the permit was issued it showed to be 75% brick. Councilnlan Freeman asked if a drawing was submitted when the permit was obtained. e Mr~ Horvath stated the only thing that was submitted was a drawing~ The permit was issued based on the drawing. January 12, 1981 Page 5 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF J. D. GRIFFITH, 6632 CHILTON, FOR VARIANCE FROM BRICK ORDINANCE POSTPONED f'11ayor Faram stated it \~as his understanding the property had not been platted and it was his understanding the property must be platted before a permit could be issued. Mr. Horvath stated the property had not been platted. Mr. J. D. Griffith appeared before the Council. Mr. Griffith stated the property was suppose to be platted. Councilman Freeman moved, . seconded by Councilman Wood, to postpone action on this request until such time the City Staff could verify platting and also before presented again have some type of elevation. Motion carried 4-1; Councilmen Freeman, Wood, Thomas and Councilwoman Groves voting for; Councilman Hubbard voting against. 8. Mr. Paul Schmidt, 4716 Lariat Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Schmidt. stated his request was to drill a well for watering his yard. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Schmidt if he was aware the depth of the well could only be 200 feet and not for human consumption. Mr. Schmidt stated he was aware of these requirements. Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve Mr. Schmidt's request to drill a wel18 Motion carried 5-0. 9. Mrs. Beverly Riley, Chairman, Cable TV Advisory Committee for North Richland Hills, appeared before the Council. t~rs. Riley stated they VJere before the Council tonight to submit recommendations the Advisory Committee felt would help the City to promote citizen participation in Local Government and better understanding of other city services and programs. Mrs. Riley introduced Dr. Dan Echols of Tarrant County Junior College. Mrs. Riley stated that Dr. Echols had researched other cities who had used Cable TV to their advantage~ Dr~ Dan Echols, 5016 Nevada Trail, member of North Richland Hills Cable Advisory Committee~ J an u a r y 1 2 ~~ 1 98 -{ . Page 6 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF PAUL SCHMIDT, 4716 LARIAT DRIVE, TO DRILL A WELL APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF COt:1MUNITY CABLE ADVISORY PANEL ON USE OF FRANCHISE FEE - PRESENTED BY DAN ECHOLS POSTPONED e Dr. Echols stated that at the meeting of the Cable Advisory Committee they had been discussing some needs that needed to be addressed in order to properly regulate and utilize the Cable TV for the benefit of North Richland Hills and its citizens. Dr. Echols stated there were several things that needed to be considered. Dr. Echols stated one thing that needed to be done was to consider the development of a municipal service, video service which would be similar to those which had been utilized in other cities, one of which was Madison,Wisconsin and the other was Redding, Pennsylvania. Dr. Echols stated he visited both of the systems and was particularly impressed with the way the municipal service was operated in Madison, Wisconsin. e Dr. Echols stated he realized North Richland Hills was not nearly as big as Madison, but the principles that were involved are the same as what is needed to be considered here. Dr. Echols stated the municipal video service was a function of the Madison Library. Dr. Echols stated it consisted of four functions; promote the public use of Cable TV by encouraging community participation in and developing procedures for the use of public and educational access channels; and, consulting with and advising community organizations; provide technical assistance and information to city personnel, the ~·1ayor, the Common Council and the public; provide resources and technical information to city departments and the audio-visual programming and production review team; provide staff support, recommendations, clerical and informational assistance to the Cable Television Program Advisory Council; supervise the administration of city 12, which was the name of the municipal channel, by providing program production, acquiring and maintaining equipment, setting policy and procedures, maintaining a regular program schedule. Dr. Echols showed a tape,at this point of the meeting4 Dr. Echols stated this channel was currently available to the City, provided by Black Hawk Cable TV Company. They also provide channels for educational use and community access. Dr. Echols stated that in the early stages of the franchise he expected that a great deal of the support that would be needed for this type of thing would be provided by the Cable Company and would require relatively little expenditures of the City, but as the demand increased on the Cable Company for operation of their equipment to provide the community access that was going to be available less and less of it would be available to the city, it would require the city to stand on its own feet to provide these servi~es. Dr_ Echols e January 12, 1981 Page 7 stated the city would have to buy more equipment to develop this and it would have to be under the direction of some city agency in order to be a liable operation. Dr. Echols stated the Committee's proposal was that the Council consider very carefully the possibility of utilizing part of the franchise fee, if that was their desire, to provide these kind of services to the citizens of North Richland Hills. Mayor Faram asked Dr. Echols what kind of equipment would be purchased. Dr. Echols stated a video tape recorder, some video cameras, audio recording equipment and eventually some editing equipment in order to edit the tapes. Dr. Echols stated some other uses of this equipment which ~ould help to justify the expenditures would be the production of the matèrials to be usèd in the training of city departments, such as, the Fire Depart~ent, Police Department and Election Judges. Dr. Echols stated one of the uses would be programming for senior citizens. Mayor Faram stated he had heard this discussed back and forth and personally had some real problems with it. One was where a city government or any kind of government putting out information. It seemed to him that would be very hard to develop any kind of rules or criteria by which information was totally neutral, completely divorced from politics. Mayor Faram stated that is why we have the free press, they could sit and interpret what happens and he could tell it in a different way, he would tell it as the position of being Mayor of North Richland Hills. Mayor Faram stated he felt it would be very touchy ground as far as he was personally concerned. When you start editing and preparing the tapes in which you are going to have for public release and the open Council meeting, right now, unless some stringent rules could be developed, he was personally having a real hard problem with the city government of North Richland Hills getting into the information business. Mayor Faram stated he certainly wanted an informed public, but, was having a hard time thinking that as an amateur politician he could screen information and go over the airways because it was subject to criticism. January l2,~ 1981 Page 8 Ie I i, Dr. Echol s stated he di d not thi nk r1ayor Faram fully understood exactly how the process took place. Dr. Echols stated this· information was not released to the citizens. The citizens were involved in asking questions of the city officials. The city officials reply to the questions and help explain them. Dr. Echols stated it was not a structure type brainwashing situation.. Mayor Faram stated he had a big problem with this until he could see some very strict rules that governed the government itself. Dr. Echols stated the committee wanted to see the Council sessions televised then the citizens could draw their own conclusions. Mayor Faram stated he would personally have a hard time trying to chair a meeting of this type. ~1ayor Faram stated his personal feeling was that if people were interested enough in government there was news media to find an unbiased source. e Councilman Wood ~tated he felt the city was faced with a change in times and in time all city functions would be on Cable TV. Councilman Wood stated the Cable TV Advisory Committee had three purposes in mind in this presentation. Councilman Wood stated the Committee was proposing to the Council that they authorize the Cable Advisory Committee, or select a citizens committee, to help establish the policy and procedures to the public governmental channels and the reason he said public was the Cable company already had advised the Committee that unless some rather firm, defined written policies and procedures were established do not take it because you would see some things you did not want to see. Councilman Wood stated the Advisory Committee needed to have additional citizenry appointed by them or the Council; Councilman \~ood stated that vIas number one. Councilman Wood stated item two, the Committee was asking for consideration to designate a portion of the franchise fee to promote the public and/or governmental excess channel sbecause no matter what is done it 'lIas going to wind up with public information, which if nothing else would be audio visual tapes. Councilman Wood stated the contract called for the company to furnish terminals and outlets, that meant a camera and a plug in the wallÞ Councilman Wood stated that as far as the Library, that meant you could rent or purchase tape programs,. The Library could run a p,'"'ogram4' The Recreation Center could y'un a tape program.. Eventually you would see on cable, credit courses. Councilman Wood stated the issue must be faced shortly and policies and procedures needed to be drawn up.. e January 12, 1981 Page 9 Councilman Wood stated the third and most important item was the Council authorizing the Cable Advisory Committee to jointly cooperate with the adjoining cities, counties and school districts, because of the duplicating process. The Hurst Library had one on the most amazing programs for them to be on the air the short length of time in the area. Councilman Wood stated it would be foolish to duplicate their effort. Councilman Wood stated this would require the city to either rent Hurst's tapes or being able to switch over and put it into North Richland Hills. Councilman Wood stated his proposal to the Council would be for the Council and the Cable TV Advisory Committee to have a joint work session. Councilman Freeman asked how much money was being discussed. Dr. Echols stated he thought the dollars should be considered to relate to what was coming in from the cable franchise. Councilman Freeman asked what the round figures would be to get the program started. Dr. Echols stated they propose that a percentage of the Cable franchise be dedicated, which would be very, very small in the early years and simply bank that away in order to utilize it. The Council would authorize the use of the money at the appropriate time. Councilman Freeman asked Mre Williams what he thought the franchise fee would be in two or three years. Mr. Williams stated he did not know at this timee Councilman Wood stated that at the present time, it was too early to have any estimates. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to postpone action on this request until such time that a joint session with the Advisory Committee and the Council could be schedulede Motion carried 5-0~ Mayor Faram advised Councilman Wood to set-up the meeting~ Mayor Faram called a ten minute recess~ Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order~ The same Counei 1 f1embers and Staff VJere present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting~ January 12, 1981 Page 10 RECESS BACK TO ORDER 10. (. e Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval, subject to the Engineers· comments and covenant being signed for pro rata., Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve PS 80-57. Motion carried 5-0. 11. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve PS 80-59. Motion carried 5-0. 12., Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning had recommended approval subject to Engineer's comments and the drainage being resolved. Mayor Faram asked if all the requirements had been resolved. Mr. Horvath stated there was a letter from the owner of the property agreeing to the drainage requirementse e Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve PS 80-63. Councilman Wood stated he would question a letter on file. If the property was sold a letter might not be sufficient~ City Attorney t~cEntire stated a covenant could be signed. Councilman Hubbard amended his motion, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve subject to a covenant being signed on the drainage. Amended motion carried 5-0. 13~ Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to approve the low bid of Tarrant Electric Corporation in the amount of $37,060.00. Motion carried 5-0~ 14e City f'-1anager t·Ji"lliams advised the Council only one bid received for the surplus park property and the Staff recommended rejecting the bid~ e Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to reject the bid of Dale Hill Investment Company. Motion carried 5-0. January 12~ 1981 Page 11 PS 80-57, REQUEST OF FORREST JOHNSON, FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, HEWITT ESTATES APPROVED PS 80-59, REQUEST OF CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOR REPLAT OF HOLIDAY NORTH, SECTION 7 APPROVED PS 80-63, REQUEST OF COLLEGE HILL CHURCH FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS A & B, BLOCK 28, COLLEGE HILL ADDITIOtJ APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR LIGHT FIXTURES AT RICHFIELD PARK APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR SURPLUS PARK PROPERTY REJECTED January 12, 1981. Page 12 Councilman Freeman asked if the estimate had been checked_ CONSIDERATION OF PAYr~ENT TO SHARROC< ELECTRIC, INC I N THE Ar10U~rl ,= $3,199.84 FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS APPROVED 15. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve payment to Sharrock Electric in the amount of $3,199.84. ( . City Manager Williams stated Allen Bronstad had checked the figures. Councilman Wood asked the status on the installation of the signals. Mr. Williams stated it was a little behind schedule because of not being able to get the poles. Mr. Horvath stated the poles were in place. Motion carried 5-0. Councilman Wood asked if this would be the final contract. CONSIDERATION OF PAYMENT TO CITY C HURST IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,603~ ~ FOR IMPROVEMENT 1. PRECINCT LINE ROA' APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION l' APPROVE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPROVED RESOLUTION NOe 81-- 16. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve payment to the City of Hurst in the amount of $6,603~00_ Motion carried 5-0. 17. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve Resolution NOe 81-1, funding to be taken from the Hotel/Motel Tax. r~ayor Fa ram ...·ep 1 i ed no ~ Motion carried 5-0~ Mayor Faram appointed Councilmen Wood and Freeman and Ci ty t~anager Chuck Wi 11 i ams to a commi ttee to negoti ate the contract~ CONSIDERATION OF CONT.RACT FOR CO~1PREHENS I V E PL,L\,f· HITH HAYNE t'J. SNYDER & ASSOCIATt. APPROVED 18. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve the contract with Wayne M~ Snyder & Associates subject to a finalization by a committee. Motion carried 5-0. Motion carried 5-0~ CONSIDERATIon OF RESOLUTION FOR THE POSITION OF:- DIRECTOR OF CITY PLAî~N I NG POSTPONED 19t" Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to postpone action on this item~ ( . e 20. t ( e ATTEST: Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to approve Ordinance No. 866, appointing r~r. Charles Owen, lJess Nelson and Cliff Griffith to the Board of Equalization for 1981. Motion carried 5-0. 21 . This item heard as item 4a. 22. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of January 12, 1981. January 12, 1981 Page 13 APPOINTr~ENT OF BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FOR 1981 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 866 CONSIDERATION OF RESIGNATION OF BOB BRADY, PLACE SIX APPROVED ADJOURN~·1ENT Dick Faram, Mayor . Jeanette ~.'loore, Ci ty Secretary e e e " ¡ 1 .~ ¡City of ~rth Richland "Hills, Texas ~ ~,j¡\1i . ~,~-:?k~~~ fA! ,<\, \: ¡ \-, V January 15, 1981 oY<.Jj- j PUB L I C NOT ICE ------ ------- The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, will have a Special Council Meeting, Tuesday, January 20,1981,7:00 p.m., in the City Hall of North Richland Hills, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. I TEf':1S FOR CONS I DE RAT ION ,L\,RE AS FOLLOt\JS: 1. Consideration of Ordina~èe on annexation/deannexation -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Work Session Following Special Council Meeting ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Personnel Action* * Closed due to subject matter , (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N,E, LOOP 820 / p, 0, BOX 1.33'05 I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 '"" t' ,.. e e e , . North Richland Hills Ordinance No~ Haltom City Ordinance No. WHEREAS, the City Council of the Cities of North Richland Hills, Texas and Haltom City, Texas have heretofore passed a joint resolution agreeing to change the boundary line between the two cities; and WHEREAS, notice of such proposed change was duly published in the official newspaper of each city; and WHEREAS, after waiting the statutory length of time after publication, both cities held public hearings within the past sixty days where interested persons were invited to appear and give protests or suggestions in connection with such proposed change in boundaries which involves annexation and de-annexation by both cities; and WHEREAS, all procedural requirements have been met by each city in order for each city to de-annex and annex the· real property necessary to change the boundary betw~en the two cities as set out below. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City CDuncil of North Richland Hills, Texas and the City Council of Haltom City, Texas that: 1. The common citylimit line between North Richland Hills and Haltom City, where it presently intersects with the tte south right of way line of the Southwestern Railroad south to a point where the said line intersects the property of W. Brown Custom Builders, Inc. shall be and is hereby, moved to establish the common line down the center of Big Fossil Creek to a point in the north right of way line of Southwestern Railroad, thence easterly and northerly along the north and west right· of way line of Southwestern Railroad to the intersection òf the south right of way line of D.S Highway 820, thence west to the present North Richland Hills and Haltom City common city limits line. 2. Each city hereby de-annexes and annexes the necessary property to ~ive full force and effect to the above change in boundary lines. 3. This ordinance shall not effect the ownership of any easement over, under and through and of the land involved herein. 4. Neither city has changed or attempted to change, nor has either city approved a change of the natural drainage in or near Big Fossil Creek. 5. The fact that the action taken herein needs to taken s~~onomously by both City Council creates an emergency and this ordinance. shall be in full force and effect without the necessity of a second reading by either City Council. .. . IÞ- Page 2 - Ordinance No. City of North Richland Hills Ordinance No. City of Haltom City e Passed and approved simuJ.taneously (by each council) on this day of January, 1981. APPROVED: Mayor of North Richland Hills ATTEST: City Secretary of North Richland Hills APPROVED: Mayor of Haltom City ATTEST: e City Secretary of Haltom City e - \. .. e e e H I~Rlli RlæIAND HILlB ORDINAl~Œ NO. HALm1 CITY ORDINfu~CE NO. WHEREAS, all legal requiranents, both procedural and substantive, have been canpli£rl with for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas to de-annex the below described tract and for t11e City of Haltan City, Texas to 3111îex the said below described tract; and \~, It is in the interest of orderly development of both Cities that the Ordinance be passed by the City Council of both Cities. NOW, 'FtIEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Coilllcil of the City of North Richl~"1d Hills, Texas and the City of 1IaI tan City, Texas, tl13.t: 1. The below described tracts be and is hereby de-annexed fran the City of North Richland Hills, Texas and a..-mexed to the City of Haltan City, Texas. 2. The tract which is de-3.Lïnexed fran North Richland Hills and.. annexed to the City of Haltan City is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, incorporated herein and made a part hereof the same as set out verbatim. 3. The fact that the action ta-1{en herein needs to be ta-l{en synonarously by both City Cotmcils creates ~, anergency and this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect wi t110ut the necessity of a second reading by either City Council. Passed and approved synonarously by the City Cotmcil' s of North Richland Hills and Haltan City this day of 1981. APPROVSD : 1,.fayor or North Richland Hills ATrFST: City Secretary of North Richland lIills . ~) . Page 2 - Ordinance No. ..~ . Ordinance No. e AITFST: City Secretary of Haltom City e e City of Horth Richland Hills City of lfaltam City APPROVED : Mayor of 1Ial tan Ci ty ...11- .... e e E >( ~ \' L, 't " A I, c?~ / ( I) ./ ~ng a 68.389 acre tract of land out of the Tabitha Akers Sur- vey. Abstract No. 19. Tarrant County, Texas. said 68.389 acres of land being a portion of that certain 100.73 acre tract of land con- veyed to Centennial Homes. Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 5186, page 542. Tarrant County Deed Records. said 68.389 acre tract of land being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron pin found at the northwest corner of said 100.73 acre tract. said pin being in the south line of Browning Heights, Section 3. an addition to the town of Watauga, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-25. Page 71. Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE S 89°48' E 166.2 feet along the south line of said Section 3 to a 1/2" iron pin found in the east right-of-way of Whitley Road (a 50 foot public street) said pin being in the southwest corner line of Browning Heights North. Section 4. an addition to the town of Watauga. Tarr:ant County. Texas as recorded in Volume 388-35. Page 66. Tarrant County Plat Records and also in the north line of said Tabitha Akers Survey and the south line of the W.J. Miller Surv~. Abstract No. 1020, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 89°45' E 889.70 feet along the aforesaid surv~ line. also being the south line of the aforesaid Section 4. to a 1/4" iron pin found for the southeast corner of said Section 4; THENCE S 89°49'30" E 735.18 feet along said surv~ line to a point. said point being the northeast corner of this 68.389 acre tract; THENCE S 0°13'44" E 1.659.16 feet to a point. said point being the 4IÞ southeast of this 68.389 acre tract; C&B Nr 0'- e e e ... '- ~ o( (! < 'r-- ~) ~K~l? i TliENCE N 89°54'09" W 1,796.49 feet along the south line of said 100.73 acre tract of land conveyed to Centennial Homes to a point, said point being the southwest corner of this 68.389 acre tract and also being the southwest corner of the aforesaid 100.73 acre tract conveyed to Centennial Homes, Inc.¡ t4 THENCE N 00°02'30" W along the east line of the J.N. King Survey, Abstract No. 896, Tarrant County, Texas. also along the west line of the aforesaid 100.73 acre tract conveyed to Centennial Homes, Inc., a distance of 1,662.80 to the point of beginning and con- taining 68.389 acres of 1and~ Pa e 2 of 2 ~ e '. . - ~ DATE: 1-8-81 SUBJECT: Rufe Snow Drive Street and Drainage Improvement DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Engineering/Public Works Discussion of reply to an inquiry made by Robert Harrison and Roger Brooks on details of Rufe Snow project. Refer to attached letter from First United Bank and reply prepared by Richard Albin. Please review carefully as to the content. Please be prepared to comment on any suggested additions or deletions you may desire. ~, N/A CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ---~-~-~---~-----~-~-~---~--~-------~-~-~---~~~---~~-~---~~-----~-~~----~~~~~~~ ~- -; f .. , " ... ."'", e e e {)o /1 (7 n f µ.ul--- ~~, ~ KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort \Vorth-Dallas Decenlber 23:> 1980 r'1r. Charles \~. vJilliaiTIs, City [/1anager City of North Richland Hills . 7301 N.E. Loop 820 rIorth Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-315, CITY OF NORTH RICHLArIO HILLS, RUFE SNOW DRIVE STREET AND DRAINAGE I r·'PROV ErriENTS Pursuant to your request, we have attempted to supply data in response to questions presented by Mr. Robert Harrison and Mr. Roger Brooks in their 1 etter to ~1ayor FaraHl åated December 19, 1980, concerni ng the subject project. Since the North Richland Hills Council directive to us by Resolution 80-36 dated No~ember 22, 1980, we have proceeded with pre- paration of construction plans and specifications for the portion of Rufe Snow from I.H. 820 to Industrial Park Blvd. No further detailed engineering work has been done or refined cost estimates made from Industrial Park Blvd. north to Fair f.'!eado~~ls Drive s-ince November 22, 1980. If you wish for us to again continue with the Rufe Snow detailed design work north of Industrial Park Blvd. please advise. All cost and assess- Inent data presented below is preliminary and precise numbers will not be available until the Contract is actually awarded. 1. WHAT WILL BE BUILT: a. Corridor plan showing right-af-way needs: b. A detailed right-of-\'lay strip map is included from I.H 820 north to Fair Meadows Drive showing additional right-of-way required on both sides of Rufe Snow. Street design including drainage: The proposed street section will be 60-feet \~ide with 2 north bound and 2 south bound through lanes with a ~ontinuous right and left turn lane down the center. The pavement SeCtlOn wi-ll be asphalt or concrete on lime stabilized subgrade with concrete curb and gutter on' both sides. Proposed storm drainage north of the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad consists of 2-60 inch storm drains west from Rufe Snow along Stardust Drive to the Sunnybrook channel which will drain approximately 40 acres from North Richland Hills as shown on the attached sketch. Storm drainage is also required in Rufe Snow between Watauga Drive and Chapman which drains to the Singing Hills Channel. A preliminary sketch for this system is also attached. The estimated construction cost for the Stardust storm drain systeiTl is approxirnately $300,000 and the Singing H'ills Channel system is approximately $120,000. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD~ TEXAS 75021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 , - ...¡ Cha rl es ~~1. Hi 11 i ams, Decenlber 23, 19.80, Page 2 e 2. COf1PLETE RIGHT -OF-t,l,~ Y ACQUISITION PROPOSAL: a. Compensation to property Q1,'/ners for acquisition: Attached is a copy of the memo from the North Richland Hills Assessor/Call ector, Ann Cannon, to the Ci ty filanager, dated Novemb2r 17, 1980, \1hich pr~esents an estimate of property values of the right-of-way required from Watauga for which the property owners 'will be compensated. b. Relocation of fences and utilities: e All fences' presently located v/;thin the proposed right-of-\\/ay along with power poles, etc., will be relocated to the pro- posed right-of-way line before construction can begin. Most water and sewerJ~nes presently located within the existing right-of-~'/ay \'/i11 not be relocated although SOIne localized adjustment to these utilities may be required because of con- flicts \'¡ith proposed storm drainage. No assessnlent, hO'1\i2ver, is provided for utility adjustmentso 3. ttlHJ~T IS PROPOSED ASSESS~:1ENT? a. What is proposed assessment for each property owner ~n both sides of street and \~Jhat method ~'las used in calculating sarne? All assessment rates are based on Resolution 79-28 for a Thoroughfare type street funded in part by a Bond Program. This Resolution is attach2d along vlith prelilninary cost estinlat2s for the construction, and an assessment rate cal'culation sheet. Again, these numbers are subject to refinement as more detailed design data becomes available. However, we would guess that the assessment rates presented are ~lithin 10% of the final rates, 'i¡hich ~~Jill be determined after a\'Jard of the Contract for con- struction. 4. WHAT KINO OF ASSESSMENT PAYMENT PLAN WILL BE AVAILABLE TO PROPERTY Ol'lN ERS : e Al thJugh the Ci ty ,;ttorne.y shoul d be consul ted for a thorough description of this procedure, our understanding is that basically the assessments become due and payable after appropriate public hearings are conducted and the rates established by ordinance. Payments are made in five equal installm2nts due respectively on or before 30 days, one, two, three and four years from the date of completion and acceptance of the street construction. Charles W. Williams, Oecember 23, 1980, Page 3 e 5. WHAT SPECIFIC ACTION IS THE CITY OF WATAUGA TO TAKE? a. pe-annexation of Right-of-l;Iay: Yes. This is suggested to facilitate future repair and main- tenance of the entire street as required by North Richland Hi 11 s cre\·\ls. b. Ordinance granting authority to assess: e Yes. In order for North Richland Hills to assess Watauga property O~\lners v/ho abut Rufe Sno~~ along \~i th the North Richland Hills property OV/ners, the Hatauga City Council should pass an Ordinance or Resolution allowing North Richland Hills to assess the ~\Jatauga property O'rlneîS in accordance \1ith the provisions of the North Richalnd Hills Assessment Policy as outlined in Resolution ~!o. 79-28, attached. Such action by the ~·Jatauga Council is necessary to aSSUt"e that both Hatauga and North Richland Hills property o\\/ners are assessed on a fair and equitable basis. 6. ESTIMATED BEGINNING AND COMPLETION DATES OF THE PROJECT: Plans are already underway to begin construction of Rufe SnO\1 fro~ I.H. 820 to the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad around March, 1981. If all goes well, work could be complete by September, 1981. The portion of Rufe Snow north of the Railroad could begin before summer of 1981 and be completed before year's end. 7. Any other information considered necessary in drafting a definite agreement: . . Resolution of specific design questions concerning storm drain construction between the Railroad and Watauga Road along with coordination of other detailed engineering requirements with the ~~atauga Ci ty Staff. You may '/Ii sh to have the Ci ty Counc i 1 comment further on any of these items ~"lhich you feel need additional clarification. fc'lean\,/hile, please call if you have any additional questions concerning this project. e f2~, ~ R I C H 1\ R 0 H. A L B I f'l, P. E . RH.l\/l j c cc: rY~r. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City r-lanager iv1r. Don Canton) ~lIatauga Ci ty Engi n2er e e e iFHrrstt []:n~1z~ B;;)?j}{ []'JJC::s""l'tD.0ìi LGJ[; [,~Ra December 19~ 1980 Robert Harrison Pr~.>.c~nl TO: Dick Faram, Mayor, North Richland Hills Info copy: Ci~ Manager, North Richland Hills Mayor Meadows, Mayor, Natauga City Manager, Watauga Richard Albin, Engineer, North Richland Hills Don Ca~tonl Engineer, Watauga FROM: Robert Harrison, President, First United Bank, Richland, N.A. 6100 Rufe Snow Drivel Roger D. Br?o~?, resident, 6101 Rufe Snm'l Drive SUBJECT: Rufe Snow Drive In the interest of promoting the improvement of Rufe Snow Drive, Robert Harrison and Roger Brooks, acting independently as property owners on this street have been in disucssion with city representatives from North Richland Hills and Watauga. The object of these meetings was to determine the position of each city in regard to the Rufe Sno~ project. In early December we met with Councilmen Dave Fre~an and James Kenna, Assistant City Manager, Dennis Horvath and Engineer Richard Albin of Knowlton, English and Flowers. all representing North Richland Hills and Watauga Engineer, . Don Canton also of KnoWlton, English and Flowers. At this meeting we determined that North Richland Hills was still interested inthe Rufe Snow Drive project ~Dd that time was of essence in taking action in order to avoid significant project cost escalation due to inflation. On Friday, December 12, 1980, Harrison and Brooks met with Maybr Meadows, City Manager Mac Macomber, Public Works Director Richard Bee and Engineer Don Canton, all with the City of Watauga. This group expressed a sincere desire to have Rufe Snow Drive improved and \{ere open for discussion on the. subject. As a result of the bvo meetings it is obvious that the b'lO cities desire to have this major thoroughfare improved, which will mutually benefit the citizens of both co~~unities. P.O. Box 18283. 6100 Rufe Snow Drive. For¡ \;\'or:h. T ex,,:> 76118 817/435-2650 . fv1 ~rnber F i e e e '\ J~Jr~ ~~1~~:\~-~~~:~ ~ 8 a)1 k ~ _. _L _../_.~.__"._.~.~._~' _.~,.O December 19/ 1980 Dick Faram, Mayor, North Richland Hills Page T\vo Robert Hit rri son Pr~~~~~n!. Our view of the City of Watauga's position is that it \vould like clarification Írom the City of North Richland Hills conunenting on the follo\'ling i terns in as fLluch detail as possible: 1. WHAT WILL BE BUILT a. Corridor plan shmqing right of way needs. b. street'design including drainage. 2. COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION PROPOSAL a. Compensa~ion~to property owners for acquisition. b. Relocation of fences and utilities. 3. \'7HAT IS PROPOSED ASSESSI"lErJT a. \~hat is proposeJ assessment for each property owner on both sides of street and what method was used on calculating same. 4. What kind of Assessment payment plan will be avail~ble to property owners. 5. \~hat specific action is the city of Watauga to take. a. De-annexation of Right-ai-Way. b. Ordinance granting authority to assess. c. Other 6. Estimated beginning and completion dates of the - project.. 7. Any other information considered necessary III drafting a definitive agreement. \~e realize that some of the above information has already been provided. . \^le feel tha-t a ,\11ri tten . reply ."\vhich T.-¡auld include all -the engineering, 'assessmen t and R. 0.. ~'1. acquisi-tion documents as attachments \\lill allO~tV us to anS\\ler questions that the City of ~~atauga might have concerning the proposed street improvement. ~'Te anticipa"te- tha-t this metl10d of com..rnunica·tion \·;ould also give Watauga officials better docu~ented information that they could use in justifying to their citizens any positiorr they decide - to take on the Rufe Snow Drive proposal. P,Q. Box'18889, 6100 Rufe Sno'N Dr¡-¡e. Fort VVorth. Texas 7ô118 817/4ô5-25S0 ,/ ·e RUFE S:iOt~ DRIVE FACT SHEET DECEr<BER, 1980 TOTA.L ESTlfw1ATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS = $3,930,000. $284.22/L.F. $146.92/L.F. = - TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJ ECT = 13 ,825 L. F . = 2 . 62 lit I L ES TOTAL APPROX. FRONT FOOTAGE = 26,750 F.F. TOTAL APPROX. vlATAUGA FRONT FOOTAGE = 8,625 FEET 32% TOTAL = TOTAL APPROX. NRH FRONTAGE FOOTAGE = 18,125 FEET 68% TOTAL - e TOTAL APPROX. WATAUGA ASSESS.. = $366)889. == 297~ Of TOTAL ASSESSr1ENT == 97; TOTi\L COST ~ . == $42.54/FF AVG. TOTAL APPROX. NRH ASSESS. =: $897,511. == 71% OF TOTAL ASSESS. = 23% OF TOTAL COST == $49.52/FF AVG. TOTAL COMBINED ASSESS. = $1,264.400 = 32% TOTAL COST e S ~::: ç::: Þ-- . [:~ " [,~ ~-- r:-:::. .. t,·, .- ¡;:: (,~ ('. f~. t_O t._ ~ t [~ E: t::. ~ c::::. r.:,:.=. :.:.:.:.:. ~- -~ .. I r~-e '- Ë ..:: {:: ..:.: t;:. C.'": . Þ 1;; j::::::::. ~C·:: t; E= t-- t..:..:- ~' ci r r· t:. . L: to. t~ to. r' t_ r'~::" c::-' t". f~· F f 1/. . , .. :-,.Þ ~ . ;:, RESOLUTION NO:: .712 r HHEREAS the City c~nCil of i';orth Richland Hills.., recognizing - tha t equi ty requi~"es tha t~ a butt i ng prOp2rtY'Q',.;ners to streets bei ng improved must bear an equitable share of th~ costs involved in acco,d- ance \"¡it:h Texas La1d. and subject to th~ 1imite.tion that no prOp2rty \'/111 be assessed for more than the valu2 added ·to said prcperty~ does her2by ~dopt the followin~ general rules regarding street imprOV2ffient assess- ments. They \Ali11 be applicable to construction, reconstruction;) and major maintenance projects where substantial improve@ent results and abutting p~operty is increased in value. assessed: The following pe~centage of actual costs shall g2neral1y·b~ ... .... Residential pröPèrty2 "Cùrb, 'Gûttèr"ánd3 , ··Side0álks State and Federal Highways (City Share) : (To Include Federal Urban System Projects on City Streets) Tho~"oughfare Streets Collector Streets Residential Stree~s ··Stöhh·Draìnaq¿ ènd Pè'.¡-ir.g_1 60% 50%" . ...~ .. 60% 70% 80~~ 50% 60~~ 7C)¡; Cn~ml~~cl&al ·Pr'o·p6rty2 '...' . . h ...... '""' "-- ... -.. . -CurD; "Gúttér-ánd3 - Sid 2~'¡a 1 ks . . . - . . . Stòfrh -0 îè.. i ã1a 92 - and Pi:! '/1 !19_1 State and Federal High1~·jc.yS (City Share) (To Inèl ud~ Federål Urban" System Projects on City . Streets)· ", ' -Thoroughfare Streets Collector Streets Residential Streets 100% 80~: 100% 100% 100% . 8Q~~ ',9C% 90% ~ate 1 - No asseSSffi2nt for paving will þ2 made whEre those costs ~r2 bQ1·ne for storm drainage and paving by stat~ and/or federal funds, on2 ~·~1 f th2' rates specified shall .be ~ssessed if construction is part of a Bond Pr0gram. t~ot2 2. - f'r·operty zoned residential but being used primëlril): ftJì" bIJ51¡:ess ,\'Jill be treated as corr~1:9rcial p~Op2rty. - Note 3 - l\pprOpì~iate credit fOï' existing cur-b) -gutter-, è-nd sidê.~'!.ll~:: \',Jiil be - granted d~pending on the amoust of repait- and reali9n;r~2nt required. ,; ~T ) . . . --......... .... ..... .-. ..... __....-...<Þ............ ........ ::::::~::::::::::=::::::. ... -.... -.. .. .. .. . -... . .. ....... . .. .. --............................. ~. -. ........ ... ...... .. ...... . ;:"-:J;:::~'-::_'.'''::,:::' . -. -....... .....,..... ;:;;.:;;.:.:.:_::~::~: . ... ..... ... .. .. . .. .. .. ... .. _...........'....... . ................ .I ............... ........ ..... e ,,~..::. c::::::: .-. :-e ç::~-:.:-:.:.:. u_ ..--- F I:::. r_. L~~~·:L~: r .-:::-'-' ¡;~: [~. t· ... ., . The percentage figures cited above are general in nature and the council reserves the right to adjust the actual clo11ar a~ounts within th~ limits allowed bj Texas Law from project to project in accordance with the relative value added to the assessed property. In the absence of substèntial evidence to the contrary, the primary factor in determining the value added to abutting property \'li 11 be the cos t of the imprOVefì12nts. " JÝ~/. /2--/ /979- l,t;YOR DICK FAR~J:1 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS ATTEST: .. CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE' !;~OORE CITY OF NDRTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FOR\t1 AND LEGALITY ". . ..»oi* " ". CITY A 1 TOR~lEY CI11' OF t~OR1·H RICHLÞ~ND HILLS . - - i . . -.. - "- '. . -. -~ ""~.... .. . . . . RUFE SNOW STREET AND DRAI fJAGE H1PROVH1ENTS ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS e JUNE 5, 1930 NRH I.H. 820 TO WATAUGA ROAD ~fA Tl"UGA COjr1 B I fi ED --- ¥7::::!. . .. r:::: :::::::~~: 1. Total Residential Front Footage 2. Tota 1 Commercial Front Footage 3. Total Combined Front Footage 4. Tota 1 Residential Assessment 5. Total Commerci al Assessment 6. Tota 1 Combined Assessment 7. Total Construction Cost 8. . Total Cost Less Assessment WATAUGA ROAD TO FAIR MEADOW DR. 9. Total Re sid en t i a 1 Front Footage 10. Total Commercial Front Footage 11. -fa ta 1 Combined Front Footage ~~ 12. Tota 1 Residential Assessment 13. Total Cbmmerci al Assessment 14. Tota 1 Combined Assessment . 15. Total Construction Cost 16. rota 1 Cost Less Assessment NOTES: 0 0 C 11,400 2,800 14,20C 11,400 2,800 14,20C 0 0 0 $ 643)758 $ 158,116 $ 801,874 $ 643,758 $ 158,116 $ 801,874 $1,902,620 $ 4ó7,360 $2,369,980 $1,258,862 $ 309,244 $1,568,106 ~e 1,000 4,250 5,250 5,725 2,475 8,200 6,725 6,725 13,450 $ 24,810 $ 105,443 $ 130,253 228,943 98)975 375,918 $ 253,753 $ 204,418 $ 458,171 $ 778,587 $ 778,587 $1)557,174 $ 524,834 $ 574,169 $1,099,003 (1) - (3), (9) - (11): Based on current zoning I:::::::'. r;:~~::: (4), (5): Residential Asses. Rate = $35.11/FF, Commercial Asses. Rate = $56.47/FF (12), (13): Residential Asses. Rate = $24.81/FF, Commercial Asses. Rate = $39.99/FF (7): Street Section is 5 lanes undivided, 8-inchs HMAC on 6-inches lime stabilized subgrade (15): Street Section if 5 lanes undivided, 6-inches HMAC on 6-inches lime stabilized subgrade (7), (15): NRH/I.Jatauga construction cost apportionment based on front footage for each city (8), (16): Assumes assessment for curb and gutter and stOID dralnage and paving per Resolution ¡Io. 7928 for ooth cities e ·e ç~u: e -.--..... l-:- ~:~.:.": :-::. -- e RUFE SNO~'[ DRIVE COST ESTlr.1ATES LOOP 820 TO WATAUGA DRIVE Minor Arterial (M5U) - 5 Lanes Undivided Assume Soil C8R = 4 ~ PAY IT Et-1 PER L.F. UNIT TOTP~L QUANTITY COST COST 4.5 C.Y. $ 6.50 $ 29 . 25 . 0.083 TONS 80.00 6.64 6.89 S.Y. 2.25 15.50 2 L. F.. 7.20 14..40 6.33 S.Y. 4.40 27.35 6.33 S.Y. 8.30 52.54 6.89 S.Y. 4.15 28.22 Sub- Tota 1 . . $174.40 Unclassified Street Excavation Lime (24 #/S.Y.) 6" Lime Treated Subgrade Curb and Gutter 2" Type II 0" H~1AC } 4 II T y pelt A .. H ¡'itA C 8 II H ¡itA C 211 Type II A II HN,l\C .... ' Times 1.10 Factor for Light Level of Adjacent Development Times 1.45 Factor for Light Drainage Requirements ................. . 191.84 ................... . 278.17 Plus Design~ Layout Inspection Testing and Right-af-Way Costs ...,..... . 55.63 Total Per Linear Foot Cost $333.80 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 'COST = 7,100 L.F. x 333.80/L.F. = $2,369,980.00 NOTE: Total Estimated Paving Costs Total Estimated Drainage Costs Total Paving and Drainage Cost ($160.00 + $86.33)/(2) = $160.00/L.F. $ 85.33/L.F. $123.17/F.F. = = = \ . . ·e é~;-~·;· e t::::::::. e RUFE SNOW DRIVE COST ESTIMATES ~'lATAUGA DRI VE TO FA I Ri:iEADOv! DRIVE \ Minor Arterial (M5U) - 5 Lanes Undivided Assume Soil CBR ~ 4 PAY ITEt,1 Unclassified Street Excavation Lime (24 #/S.Y.) 6" Lime Treated Subgrade Curb and Gutter 211 Type .. 0 IJ Hf'1AC 4 II T Y P e II A II H tr1 A C 611 Hf'IAC .»~ ... Times 1.10 Factor for Light Level of Adjacent Development PER L..F. QUJ\NTITY UNIT COST $ 6.50 80.00 2.25 7.20 4.40 8.30 4.5 C.Y. 0.083 TONS 6.89 S.Y. 2 L.F. 6.33 S.¥. 6.33 S.Y. Sub-Total . . . . . .............. . Times 1.20 Factor for Light Drainage Requirements . . . . ................. . Plus Design, Layout Inspection Testing and Right-of-Way Costs ........... . Total Per Linear Foot Cost. TOTAL COST $ 29.25 6.64 15.50 14.40 27.35 52.54 $146.18 160.80 192.96 38.59 $231.55 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST = 6~725 L.F. x $231.55/L.F. = $1,557)173.75 . NOTE: Tota1 Estimated Paving Costs Total Estimated Drainage Costs Total Paving and Drainage Cost ($131.78 + $32.16)/(2) ~ $131.78/L.F. = $ 32.16/L.F. ::: = $ 81.97/F.F. {;!,~;( e (2) e É:~:~~~:. ~:~:.:: e ASSESSMENT RATE CALCULATIONS FOR RUFE SNOW BASED ON RESOLUTION 7928 Residential: 60% Curb and Gutter 25% "Paving and Drainage Commercial: 100% Curb and Gutter 40% Paving and Drainage ~ LOOP 820 TO WAïAUGA ROAD: Residential: C & G 0.60 x $ 7.20 = $ 4.32 P & 0 0.25 x 123.17 == 30.79 TOTAL $ 35.11/F.F. C &,G 1.00 x $ 7.20 = $ 7.20 , P -& 0 0.40 x 123.17 = 49.27 TOTAL $ 56. 4.7 / F . F . Commerc i a 1 : WATAUGA ROAD TO FAIRMEADOW DRIVE: Residential: C & G 0.60 x $ 7.20 = $' 4.32 P & 0 0.25 x 81.97 = 20.49 TOTAL $ 24.81jF.F. C & G 1..00 x $ 7.20 = $ 7.20 P & 0 0.40 x 81.97 = 32.79 TOT AL . $ 39.99 Commercial: ·e .' rT3~::·· ~_.-.. e t·..,·.. e City of Jj(8rth Richland Hills, Texas \~Ikz ~~ TO: CHARLES WILLIAHS, CITY Hð.NAGER FROM: ANN CANNON, ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR DATE: NOVEMBER 17~ 1980 REF: TOM-0002-8Q SUBJECT: PRESENT VALUES AND PROJECTED VALUES OF PROPERTY FRONTING RUFE SNOW DRIVE I have done a study of recent sales on Rufe Snow Drive, north of Loop 820, to try to estimate the current market value. After a careful study of these sales it is my opinion that the market value of frontage property on ROre Snow Drive will vary from $ 1.40 per square foot to $ .50 a square foot with the proximity to Loop820.and the size of the tracts, being the determining factor. You will note that the Gulf Oil and McDonald's property brought a much higher price, but the trends show that these types of buyers tend to pay more for a particular location. The sale of 11.032 acres. north of Chapman Road and south of Hightower for $.66 a square foot, indicates the values further north on Rufe Snow for the larger tracts. ~. As we all know the lack of activity on land. sales along Rufe SnoW"has,been slow for the last several years. However-since the passage of the bonds, activity has increased tremendously. Kroger is negotiating with K-Mart for the purchase of some of their property at this time at a considerable increase of proper~ value. Gulf Oil, McDonalds and Cambridge Developers have purchased the property at Loop 820 and Rufe Snow. Owens and Stevens are doing dirt work for an Industrial Center and Mr. Prideaux has purchased property for another Industrial Complex.. Fenimore and Blythe has purchased 3 Tracts in Hatauga that are zoned General Business. Cities Services, has purchased a corner at Watauga Road and Rufe Snow for a service station. These are prudent buyers, well aware that the'improvement of Rufe Snow will increase the value of their properties. They were also aware that they would be assessed for their part of the improvements. I have talked to several of these buyers in the last_several days and they all agree that the improvements on Rufe Snow could increase their property values by 30 to 50%. It is the opinion of this appraiser that tile increase in value of the property that fronts Rufe Sno\'l Odve after the completion of the project \'1i11 ¡¡¡ore than off set the price of the assessment. 4~ (817) 281-0041 I 7301 N.£. lOOP 820 / P. 0, BOX 13305 / NORTH R1CHLAND H!llS, TEXAS ìôIl3 , . . ... ,e Sale # 1. Gu 1 f 0 i 1 loop 820 Sale # 2. . rS- ... \i'" e r::~.::: ".:.:.:';:::- e Corporation purchased 23,811 square feet at the corner 6f and Rufe Snow at a purchase price of $4.25 a square foot. McDonalds purchased 52,491 square feet just north of Tesco line north' of Gulf property for a purchase price of $3.25 a square foot. Sale # 3. Cambridge Company,Inc. purchased a 17 acre tract that is L shaped part on loop 820 and part on Rufe Snow. The purchase pri ce Vias in . excess of $100,000.00 or approximately $1.40 per square foot. Sale # 4. ~.. Intercontinental Pipe and Steel, Inc. purchased 18.136 açres on Rufe Sno\>l just south of the railroad. This property sold for $20,000.00 an acre or approximately $.45 a square foot. Sale_# .5.. First United .Bancorporation ,-Inc. is a '3 acre tract purchased in Junê =:-~. of 1978 'for -$1.25 a square foot. . Sale #6. .; .. "1 Is a 11.03 acre tract m-med by Kroger. This was purchased in fl,prn of 1979 for $.97 a square foot. Kroger currently is negotiating with K-Mart'~r a purchase at .$1.60 a square ~ot for frontage and $1.10 a square foot for land on the rear or $1.35 a square foot overall. Sale # 7. This is a 47 åcre tract of land, and sold for $5,400.00 an acre. This property is on the north end of the project on the west side of the road. This property has a very bad drainage problern i'irrich \1111 account for the lO'¡ler purchase pri ce_ ·, ' e f:,",· ... (....... e F··..· f:u .... ........... e . .-. Sal e # 8. Is located north' of Chapman Road and south of Hightower Road., There are three tracts of lànd totaling 22.03 acres of land. This was purchased by Fenimore-Blyth In August of 1980 at a purchase price of $.66 a square foot. Sale # 9. Owens and Stephens purchased approximately 57 acres of land on the west side of Rufe Snow along the railroad for $4,500.00 an acre. This property has very bad tapa ~nd \'i11 require a lot of \~ork, therefore' the purchase price was low. A resale of several gooà acres at $13,500.00 per acre is an indicator of market va~ue of land without drainage or tapa problems. There have been no sales of vacant lots of residential property in the project area. I arrived at a market value by contacting F_H~A. They are allowing $8,000.00 per lot for their contracts. This works out to $ .78 per square foot on an average lot of 85 ~~120 feet. ")" ", e €!ih e 6::::.:· e · The following figures are not firm, they are merely projected figures as PÇr . your request. The engineers study has not been comþleted as of this date. P,roperty Owner Right of Way Needed Assessment ~1ill iam Sodd 11,340 sq. ft. @$.50 per. sq. ft. . $5,670.00 1)620.5 ft. @$39.99 a ft. $64~803.79 I---J e-T -= SC¡, I :, 3 ~ ì C¡ Fenimore & Blythe None needed (already dedicated) 1,812.80 ft.@$39.99 a ft. $72~493.87 I' Carrol B. Pippin residential 6,240 sq. ft. @$.50 a sq. ft. $3,120.00 416 ft. @$24.81 a ft. $10,320.95 1J'Z.ùa.9~ Texas Electric 20,829 sq. ft. @$.66 a sq. ft. $13:»747.14 1~388.6 ft. @$39.99 a ft. $55~530.11 4 \ I -, 2 I ·1 7 .... "' Frank W. English 1~800 sq. ft. @$.78 a sq. ft. $ 1:)404.00 120 ft.. @$24.81 a ft.. $ 2~971.20 \ ~l?,¿u Myrtle Pippin 1,800 sq. ft. @$.78 a sq. ft. $ '1,404.00 120 ft. @$24.81 a ft. $ 2,977.20 t573rzO 70 ft. ~'-'@$39~-99 .:; , ; a ft..~~.$ 2 ~'977 ;=3-0 LIÇ?;3ù 120 ft. @$24.81 a ft. $2~977~20_ 'l ~3,.2.o R i cnw-aý - Homes· ~-: ~.:.' :1 ,050, .s-q: 'ft.. {)$. 78 ¡Ï~:- ~ ·sq. -ft. " '$'819:00 "1 .. Edward Brown l,800·sq. ft. @$.78 a sq. ft. $ 1,404.00 Albert R. Rich "1)800 sq. ft. @$.78 a sq. .ft. $1,404.00 120 ft. @$24.81 a ft. $ 2~977..20 tC-¡ 3 rl.D . .,/ Valley Distributing Not needed 91 ft~ @$39.99 ..ct $3 C"r-. 0,..., a *. . ~O.j::J.. ':J \ f Alan Hanm and J_B. Sandlin 4)185 sq. ft. @$1.10 a sq. ft. $4,603.50 279 ft. @$3·9.99 a ft. $11~157.21 Cities Service f.:..5 ~:3·7 { Not needed 150 ft. 0$39.99 a ft. $5,993.50 \ \ Bell Telephone 3~750 sq. ft. @$1.10 a sq. ft. $4,125.00 250 ft. @$56.47 a ft. $14.117 ')0 .~ e 6~::: ~.~. e (}.::~.:.: ç:~:: e ~ ..... Property' Ot:ner Right of Way Needed Nat Brooks 36% Roger D. Brooks 28% Effie Brooks 36% Tr. lCl, Abst 630 9,813.6 sq. ft. @$l.lO a sq. ft. $10,794.96 1,620. sq. ft. 8·,220 sq. ft. sq. ft. @$1..10 a $ 1,782.00 ' sq. ft. @$1.10 a $ 9)042.00 8,194.52 sq. ft. @$1.10 a sq. ft. $9,013..97 2)602.19 sq. ft. @$1.10 a _..~q. ft.. $ 2 ,862.40 $33,495.33 Assessment 654.24 ft. @$55.47 a ft. $36,944.93 108 a ft. ft. @$56.47 $ 6,098.76 548 a ft. ft.. @$56.47 $30,945.56 541.78 ft. @$56.47 a ft. $30>594.31 84.9 ft. @$56.47 a ft. $ 4~794.30 . ~09 ,377 .. 85 c- 7 ,...., 1 S, t( _r~~ Roger Brooks Tr. 1B, Abst 630 None needed ·130 ft @$35.11 a ft. $4,564.30' Y1 TOTAL -: $71,195."97 '"\ .. $366;889.29 T öf A l F f ::. S J G ~ T ( rt.. \ F t,J 0 þ ç þ (llC.... &~: . 0 '" r~ ((00 t:S t::>~~ ~ ç··~;-r2.-::: ti ..,. P I~ v (/---J C ( , t 7 ' ASP ¡,J" .-= , ' La ( I L ö · 0 cJ "I ;2':'- .IS S l, t 0 () J r:: ¡::: c ='LJ 0 / ::-. ' - a :x /' ~ ~ (9 - 1,'LQ ~r,4-0 c ~- ~ yo. GO ::: 1-,+-,0 D p. .)Z 0 , q- ù ---- f:JKO,25' c /__ C. ('J () -r- -'1 --' c. 0 r/Î (./\ ----- ß :~Q':J \~ $' Þ- f:~ri, .J.J ¡ .I ~-.JJ 1:::7'1 c') ~ ;..)~') '"'- .., ;\. + -: I .~:- ~) '": C ¡'2: I... ¡ (.J" ~ , , J3a.6.:J (' -~ r:., '\ - ...-'l' '.>_) \ €. ssE 0 (J) :: 4· , ~ ? - .r: '" ~ 2 C-_ ~ ~ .t:, Z r r "> ----- ~-::- (.' a -:" ~ . C' C ¿6/jLJr-' -- :? /.6 I t [, 0 JI :¿ t., __ 1'"""" --- --- ~ ~ C,r 'ì I j as,'f ~ tow-- , ~ I .T -- ~S(;ISÖ1rc-¿ ~.:,:::::: n F ~ f G i\J ST· A ;NfnA RDo:.::.::: , · 1>'--# ..-- '-J t ., ~ i , LJ : 0'''-' o ~........_ . M 5 U-:. MINOR ARTERtAL 4 TRAFFICLANES-, . - 1 CONTINUOUS LEFT TURN LANE ~ -~- . rJ. ~0 -~~-]... ·e f:::, Bolder numbers denote recommended standard ~ * * ' PARXWA'f LANE CONTINUOUS . lAHE TURN LAS~ LANE 0 lANE PARKWAY. -- JO'Min. 22'- 24' 11'-13' 22' -24' fOI Min. ...... 13· 2~1t ~ 12· j 24' j 15' ~ 73' (-}-) , 90 DESIGN ELEt-AENT Number Traffic lanes lane Widths (feet), Right-af-Way Width (feet) ~si9n Speed (M.P.H.) 1 Grade . (percent) . Stopping Sight Disian~e2 (feet) Horizontal Curvature 3 (degrees) · V~rtical Clearance (feet) lllitteral Clearance It (feet) Continuous left Turn lane Width (feet) .... " '11 f nfmum De-si ra bl it Recornm9nd&d 4 4 4 1 1 J 1 2 I 1 2 I 7 5 ¡ B 5 I 9 0 I 35 ':I: ::::t ',:.:: ¡! !::Ii¡::if':¡:m ::j:i: {:m;. 3 5- 4 5 0 5 M- n 7 Max 5 7 ( .~ ) . . ¡ 1 .,. . - 250-325 I 300-425 ~ 0 0 - 42 5 .:) :':":::iI,@H@@[:i:::::{JtJ:¡:¡- :I:tmr'::==::¡:::}¡:::mrr:::mm: 7 0 1 ,.. 5 . - -:) .. 1 5 , 1 5 I { + , 1 5 I ( , ) I ·r 2 J 6 1 6 I .. 1 1 I 1 3 J 1 2 J STANDARD Capacity (vpd): 20,000 t~OTES : lStandardus€d depends upon type of terrain and design speed. 2Standard used dependS Upon design speed and perception/reaction t~me. 3Standard used depends upon design speed and extent of superelevatl0n. ~Effective caoacity is reduced.with any lateral clearance less than 6'. *S22 Parhiay Design Considerations. e 1~13 ~......... ............. .4...... .......... ...... ..._................. ";.. ~ .. I J i ~ i J I u lj a g ~ ~ ~ ~ " -- \ {~ -- \ c-"; J fÇ "....... C .../# ---/'- í ~.. ~ ~ - Þ- --- ù 2- c::::> ~ c6 '6 ~ e ; t :... 0·"( 6 ~~. J ; t i I ~ J I'; ~~~ -..W I ., ,,' \ ~J I rev A J ¡ I ~. L ~; III g · v1 I 1 ~ ! t ,'; ¡ ~'~' ,7 ~ r r\" r ~:~7, '.,~ ¡ I ~ .~ ~ ~ :. I c..s(,~~~~ 11 ':0. i:J. :;:nz '-:o~ ~o~~~~~ ~ I ~~,JI ~[ .J Eš:i ¡ f¡ ï ......:'! _ .. L~ > ;JI i~~/ r-- t:: : 1/1 311¡V . * I~rll ~ ,)1 . 0 t? C h A R 0 L~¡,~::: tH .~-+5--.. /-. 'r ~:L1' o. ê.~'J.C/ ¥!-: J ,G~~: ~rl d ~ ~~~"H ~ ~11 < i1f L ~~:3 ' L"! ~"-' 1< t'.;' ..:, L J {I~__r \ O ?L-.., C :-1 ~ ¡ J. · ....r..._ "" ~_i :I 1 \ i~L I \} iH I · -':':~JI>~ \ D ~.~ c\c ~1Hf . - : ,,~:.~ 811 ~ ." ~¡ ~tl Ù~ f~ ~ [ii ~L ~L --. ~h _.: ·ii¡ ~f· '. . ..;;l;~,v / };:/ ifF Á /::~;...: H' · ~~~:'~/1i:i~~L---- / // / ! 1 A'>", I~::ofo . I ... I . ~ .., - --,- I ~ I .... I., ~ . \.. . \' 7' ..&. . '" -". ". 1 ". . a.., - ,. . ~ .. .. .. \ 't.. .~-..( .> toO l C '] r..' " , . C "~V"":". \ .. ~\ '~ ~:';:-f..>~ . II / 'I I 00 \ n \ H \ ~ ..-o!~~-;--:----... .. ~ ~ ~ ....~ ::.::t"~~, . "'... .. I I.l / B i~· !\! ~ ...-1 , ì' I ., I '. ¡ " I ç I ' ! · J '.\ ; .\. '\ ~..:--(A;" ~.. , , ,.""., ,'0> . \ . r-; ~¡ - I ." ~ J~ t I ' - 1. ;\. ,A.,~ .~ .... /-í~{ I' I I~ 1 .) I '~~ I) 1'1 \ ;1 ~ tv \ \ . \-.:=h~l-: -.-.- ~:..:=:: ~-=--~~~~".. " 11 /"" ~~, !'- i 1'- ~ 'J I 'oo J tJ i I ~ \ :'_.. ¡ ~-¡: ~ ;-'1-:- ....' -:- -~I' -'---I' -',~':'I:~ ,-,--:, l\ \.'..\. /\'" \;I~ ~.... .. I .. , , ...~\, .. 1 ,. \ --.. JooI-~y- .. ; ~ I ; H . ~,. ., ~ \./'~ .-. ---- 7 . I . Z- - \, 10 :1 t. ' :: . ., ! '~ I " ! 0' i '.' , ~ In' ~. .<. . , '~1 :~)\ \ I l-);~ :.:>r," .. - "\ \ 3,:- tlll '¡ or-' .. . ,T ,\ r I L-.-~ r -I111 i " I .~ t ) I · r T I ~ J \ ~ ~ f.. ~ 'f~' J I ~ ii ...1 n_:,,,h .Š ,. . I I ' t, L--..~~ .¿ :~. ~ I I. ~ I - ... , I ~ l~ ;. ~:) r; í ~~ I ~ I J i ~ 1 J i--1 \----~. U ~ ., d J! I I ~ ~ ~ :'~ ~ :tl~ i .; t ï o. i " ! .. '.' i '.' I h '.' I '! . '.' '.' I ':! _~ ;:! _. I .I. -. ~--=------- . 1 '-rr-:-... . _ -: t\ 1 ~ ~ l. ~ t~,)PFE? C?¡.·~ - -, I I 0' ~ T I (') ~ ! ¿I 2 I ~ d~1 I M I ; G L 0 :'1 ILL C i r: C L E ~~~~..J--~LllLL-1~~.---1~.lillJJJ1- I I_~W~ "':'I.'." ì 2 . RiCHLAno £. ÞC.:,....J HILLS . , ., I t ~ i I 1 j I I r I /: f I I I I . I ~ ~ I J 51 if ~; f~ /" .Á I 6.0 ð.( - A~ G. 0 C-{G A3 10. 74-qc., A~ 4-,9 lq c.. "~ /1 . ¡ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ )( 1 ,- ~ \. â 1 oJ j 1 J ; ¡ f l f f Ð,l\ TE: 1-3-81 e SUBJECT: ComRrehensive Land Use Planning· DEPAR-r~JENT: City t1anager BACKGROUND: Discussion will be in reference to Item 17 IIResoÎution to appropriate funds for land use stydyll, Item 18 "Contract for Snyd~r and J\ssociates", and Item 19 IIOrdinance creating- position of Director of Planning" ....~ " . ..... '" ..>. " '~ e. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: N/A BUDGETED ITEr'l: YES N/A . NO J\CCOUNT NUf/18ER: N/ A " -----------------------------------------------------------------.-------------- e ,",þ~ DATE: 1/8/81 SUBJECT: Procl anlation - Fort Horth Christian School e DEPARTMENT: Ci ty tl:anager BACKGROUND: As you knovv, Fort Worth Christian School is a private school 'II i th i n 0 u r C i t Y . Thei r footba'l team \-¡as abl e to be victorious as the State Champions for Texas Association of Private Schools. The proclamation will be presented by Mayor Faram to Superintendent Harold Wade and/or Head Coach Randy Tribble. The Fort Worth Christian School Cardinals football team will be in attendance for this presentation, approximately 30 people will be in attendance. ~~ e CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Presentation of proclamation BUDGETED ITErf1: YES N/ A NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e ft , ., , ,. e City of 5Xõrth Richland Hills, Texas '":0.,;' J L<1 ~f:~- í ~ \¡ ! t WHEREAS, the Fort Worth Christian School Cardinals, members of Texas Association of Private Schools will now be Texas Association of Private Schools State Champions. e WHEREAS, this team coached by Head Coach Randy ¡ribbl~ was elected as Coach Of The Year in Pr1~ School ~onfërence, and; HHEREAS. Duck Brewer was nominated as Top Offensive Player Of ~ Yea r! ...., " ~~HEREAS,. this team is comprised of 29 fine young men. 3 Coaches, 3 Managers. 1 Trainer, 1 Superintendent ·and. 1 Principle: Harold'Wade, Superintendent Jerry Plemons, Principle Randy Tribble, Coach Garland Johnson, Coach Al Sex'ton, Coach Darlene Clayton, Manager Jimmy Bedgood, Manager Jeff Harrison, Manager Alan Kent, Trainer Phil Strzinek, Junior Aaron Woods, Junior Kevin Stone~ Junior Wesley Scott, Junior Link Davis, Junior ---~---------------- -----------~-----~-~ Jeff Markham, Sophomore Mike Boaz, Sophomore Tim Roberts, Sophomore Brian Dempsey, Sophomore Dan St. Clair, Sophomore Robert Hart, Sophomore Jerry Petty, Sophomore Scott McGovern, Sophomore e Duck Brewer, Senior Mark Alexander, Senior Philip Taylor., 'Senior Ronnie Beam, Senior John Park, Senior Benny Perry, Senior Lee Hardin, Senior Brad Johnson, Senior -~--~-~---~----~---- Rick Thompson, Freshman Farland Clark, Freshman Thomas McCafferty, Freshman ----~-----~-----~--- David Pearson, Junior Ricky Scott, Junior Greg St. Charles, Junior Dickie Rhoten, Junior Kcvin Walter, Junior WHEREAS, it is the desire of North Richland Hills to pay tribute . to Coach and 'Team Members of Fort Worth Christian School. . The Cardinals have outstanding sportsmanship and are recognized as the Texas Association of Private Schools State Champions for the State of Texas. NOW THEREFORE, I, Dick Faram, Mayor of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas do hereby proclaim this 12th day of January, 1981, as Cardinal Day. IN TESTlr-'10NY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of North Rich1and Hills, Texas, to be affixed this 12th day of January, A. D., 1981. Dick Faram, Mayor TO: Chuck Hilliams 1-7-81 t , SUBJECT: Variance- from Buildi~g Code. Ordinance Z8L1. > requir-ing 75% bdck · e . .~ DEP¡~uqTr~!ENT: Publ ic \larks/Inspections. BACKGROUND: ~;Jr. Oal e Jessup requested a vari ance from the Buil-ºiJ1J1_Cod_~ .org.. 784 requiring 75% masonry type material for addition to his home. . Since the north wall òf garage was constructed from wood siding, he woutd likß to continue same construction as garage to eliminate . expe~se. .v ' " e CITY COUì·!CIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve vari ance - BUDGETED ITEf'!: YES r{o xx - . p.,CCOU~iT f{Ui'î3ER: . ------------------------------------------------~~--------------------------- .e e Dec. 10, 1980 Office of City ~2na~er City of N. 3ichlend Hills 7301 N.E. Loon 820 N. ~ich12~d Hills, Tx. 76118 De2,r 3ir: ht.Ü1d a 16 x 18 foot storp."'e rooe:'! onto the o8ck of As ',"? h'·'.~.re VfèJ ry 1 ìi'?) i t e ,-1 s t 0 r2r::e S r)"'C e, '."'e need. to pOtlreà there. our g(~.r~'t:r,e. "sl8,b of C oncrete1:12.8 g,lre::;.dy òeen In order to hold dov'.TI exrysrrses 2nd for continuity, we V'8,nt to use t~e ~:].me t,r'J8 of ','.'ood sid.in~ that is already on the outer north ',"8.11 of the ,g:a.r2.,o:e. The e rest of the house is bri~1:. 'rhis would mean tn8.t we would not have 75~ of Cur house brick so we vé'oulà. like to obtain 2. v8,rio.'C1.ce to 8.110v! us to do Our nei:~hbor on the nOTt~1 -;-ho ','fotÜd h7lve the most com- .L 1 · GIll S . nlete vie'.'! of this 'i'.':~u10n't object. ':Ie vvou1d 8.1')'t')reciate it ~Tc;ry mU.ch if the ci t:;r cotmcil would c onsid er our reClu.est B.t it's e8rliest ODDor- ttU1.i t.:r . Th811k Y01J.., @jZ·r TIr.l r-: !'J e S Stl n 5.3 09 Grp pn~'-T 0 oè_ '<:' 8:r I':;. R i C }1 J. ;""1.~~ c1 ~~ i J_ J_ s , r;: ......_ -- ..:-- . 7 6:~ ~_? 2e 1- )-850 e eE & NO. OF STREET OR AVENUE .·:-:-h'j' PROPOSED OCCUPANCY /~'-1fV LOT I ("/, BLOt" K "-1 ~-, // "" ~(: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AND CHECKlIST Permi t # . ~ /' EE- ,., ! / þ- -' /' } J"\ - ~ ,'\. - .'V i...... II L· í./ II / ¿\J' /7 'v DATE 11- /1- i/~· ZONING ADD lor I ON :.¿ ~_-__.. 1,-' I E-, -/.<:> /_.. ACREAGE REPAIR· NEW CURB & GUTTER / . ~ð FLOOR AREA I¿; iY J &' / EST. COST ¡¿lOO.- STREET: ¡~, .~ . ... . --1..' - ;// '), T- t_O. ¡~ .' 7 ;) /- /7 /i ~ ~/¿~::.\,) OTHER PAVED ************************************************************************************************ LOT EXTERIOR WALLS ROOF ************************************************************************************************ CORNER INSIDE WIDTH '/ ';,J / lENGTH_ ;/~:~? 6 ARE;' SQ. FT. SET BACK FRONT YARD SET BACK YARD BRICK PERCENTAGE ~JOOD SIDING f't1 ET AL OTHER DIMENSIONS /~ y / J' I ~JOOD SH INGLE I COMPOSITION v BUILT UP METAL OTHER ..... .. NO. OF ROOMS ************************'~********************************************************************** FOUNDATION UTILITIES 1IIr******************************************************************************************** CONCRETE SLAB X DEVElOPER PRO-R.~TA PAID (If appl icable) PIER & BEAM ~J¡nER TAP PAID PIER SEWER TAP PAID SEPTIC TANK METER DEPOSIT REVOLVING ACCT. PLUMBING ELECTR rCAL ¡;z PLur!!BING CONCRETE HEATING & AIR ~ ****************************************************** ***************************************** TtJ8 AND/OR SHOWERS LAVATORIES TOILETS SUB CONTRACTORS THE OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY AND THE UNDERSIGNED AGREE TO CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE ORDINANCES OF TdE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. AND ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DM1AGE TO ANY AND ALL CITY PROPERTY EITHER UNDERNEATHÓR ABOVE THE GROUND. THEY SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ILLEGAL DUMPING AND RESPONSIBLE FOR WATER USED UNTIL ACCOUNT IS CHANGED FROM THEIR NM1E. ,.' . /) OWNER ,:;, (/ {J ...... ,é/; i' (;: r'~ CONTRACTOR ßZ-:;-rif:" ~ on Rf- t~ S ("'-;7... ~ (I··' J-\ ~ L. ,e..) ...J. "'( I .~ «:. /~- .-~!: ¿:~ ~/ t. t'.;' (.: (.l l) L{ ,: .,). // '-- ADDRESS P.E .~){.'" /. / ()<_j-- (ì PHONE ( . / t:V~'l.boJ . 'I ~ ~ '" ~ PLl\T OF LOT 19, BLOCK 28, NOR' EAST ADDITION TO THE CIr! OF NORTrl RICHIA~D HILLS þ TARRANT COU~~Y, TEXASþ ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-21, PAGE 80, PLAT RECORDS, TAI~.J.~Al\lT COUNTY,' TE(}\S LOYD BRAi\JSOM SURVEYORS INC. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR J028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE.." FT. \'VORTH, TEXAS 76111 834-3477 ~ -1 .~ J '1 71 J ~ I DO HEHE8Y CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP I S TRUE J a CORRECT AS SURVEYED ON THE GROU:-ID.; ~.~ ~ ì 1 '-. ':1 =:; 1~) ~~~ 6- dy' --gO i LOYS BRA'I30....J ~I-i:d;.·...tl ~, '\j //.;I /¿t· D'/ en: / /.171' - .j "\¿ LJ C/ft/3 " I /"/ ~ -- \ ~ 0t\ ~~~~~ ~ zZ' ,\ , \~~}¡ 1 ! ~ t' ,I,"n", ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~f ~ ~ w¡ ~ '\. ~ ~ ~ ~¡ l\) . \, ---' ...... r=.-:-:;-:;')f "J .. ~ i ~r<f~ . I~! ~ ; r ~ ~ ~~ ~I ~ ~ j I ~ ~ ~ '{ ~. ~ ~ ~. ~: \ 1 '"" ·1 ("- 0.) c 0#0 £> K/Vc J ( ~ u I I Y.r .> . ~ ~. C) I ~ ., ~. JtC-.. - ~-r- " /26. ~ . OJ- J¿), ~ ~I ..... ~ ë,-r- ~I oi ~ ~1 ~ .ÞC. - LtJLÁ' U/?/y¿- i , II , I ~ f I , J I ~SC~ (::30' ~.:~14 ,,' ~:J :: ....., C no ,..\ C H MEN T SOT HER T H /\ N S H 0 "11 N ~td~~ ..7 ~-""; 0 F .,. ~ 1.)~~~::~···\·~··\t"'1~" ~, ..~~ - ..{.. ?--''f . \S" A. . _'- _. ;J :RONPIN V:~.: .'" '.~~ 4 o I RON PI PEt··· ~.~ :.~ ,,~;;;,~~~.;.:. "~.' Ï/. ,{1\ 1::. B () ISO' ARC: S T A K E "). · '.: · · .. · · .. .. · · · . · . · :-. · · r ,. " II í \: Or \'\ -0' 9 S 3 , ~ ~ '. 1 t . ~. ...... 0 ~~ C R::' T E ~~ 0 N ~ C;'. ...,. ~ .' "0"''' ,. "Ir 11 '. " -X-x- FENCE ~ () ··..'f'.s71~~.~~ -1 I.·... '.........:... .'.l..~...........\ -U-u_ POWER LINE ~~~C~i\l:~~.,¡þ:.!1qJ>~ -T-T- T¿LEPHONE LINE ) - l Y,.~ l (~ ..' ~~ \ \ \() 'b 't i ~ / L~~GEND C).Ä T E I , \ .. I \\ 1\ ~ ~ } ~~ t) ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ \j -~ ~ ~ i I I 1 p. i ~ I I i ä I 1 J ~ ~ ) ~ ~ '~ 1 :t e ~ ................,........,~, "...............~....... '.....- .".............. ~ "." -........ --, '----~ /., ~ .---------- '_________ - ~ () , -----t-- _____ III/lit -.-~:--L---- "" ______ ~ I -------"-' "..... . "'-_""_ _ "'t. -~ e i j \ t ! j ¡ ---- _._----~------_..._-_..--- --------! i j ¡ I i ! ; I \ I ¡ 1- -, \ ... \;1 . \ l \ \,' .-") \ \ ~ - \ :'-' /'+ \ 'y r: / . t I r I' ~ --\ ~, \ ~ . ' ~ . r-Y .. : "., It : \. ').. - ~ ~ ,r¡/ ,/j ¡'I ~ c¡ Ii' ......r ./ - - !H57//;/'; }- vi, __--.---..---.--1 e (\ , ~ ,1 : ; i \ I'~ l/ I, I ,0t.. (} ../ 1 L..' / v DA TE: '/ 1-7-81 S'UBJECT; . Garage built at 6632 Chilton Drive DEP ART~1ENT: Building Inspection section of Public \~orks BACKGROUND: A permit was issued 4-21-80 to },Ir . J. D. Griffith to build a garage and storage building separate from the house. This permit stated 75% brick for outside walls. At the time permit was issued Mr. Caldwell instructed Mr. Browning to issue the permit even though the property was not platted. He stated that Mr. Griffith had agreed to get the property ~7-- platted. Property has not been platted. Garage is cement (first floor) wood siding on second floor. ..... .. ~ 'I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or disapprove variance of brick ordinance. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUrf18ER: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- , J.D. GRIFFITH 662~ CHILTON DRIVE s~tITHFIELD, TX. DECEMBER JO, 1980 CITY MANAGER CITY NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 N.E. LOOP ~20 NRH, TX. RE: VARIANCE & BRICK ORDINANCE DEAR ~m. WILLIAMS, PLE.~SE PROCESS THIS FORM AS MY APPLICATION TO SIT IN ON THE COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE VARIANCE AND BRICK ORDINANCE. I AM CURRENTLY ADDING ON TO MY HOME AT 6628 CHILTON DRIVE AND WAS TOLD BY DALE BROWNING, BUILDING INSPECTOR, TO APPLY. PLEASE CONTACT MY OF?I'CE AS TO WHEN THIS ~tEETING WILL EE HELD. THE ADDRESS AND PHOl\~ N1JM"BER IS TYPED BELOW. THANK YOU FOR YOtJR TIME. SINCERELY, JERRY D. GRIFFITH OFFICE .4.DDRESS: J.D. GRIFFITH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. ROUTE 1 ~OX 151-A KELLER, TEXAS 76248 ~USINESS PHONE: 379-5530 er 379-5927 HOME PHONE: 281-0950 JDG/SS í \\ . e:'" ~ \ yJ~ (. , ( ð~\,.. C>Cj\\ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILL' . BUILDING PERNIT APPLICATIíV! /"\!'ilJ CHECKLIST . ~ ..... -. C"'T r- / - n O~ -I"'E ~'.- _?/' _ :.Y/'?' " :\0. L t· ~) R EE'T (¡R [\ \1~Ï'"¡U t. 1/., í~ ") J} (-c h j ,/ /' c) fi /' .. ,;.ç/ 11 - /. ~ C/ L." (j? ~~ ; · /J j~ /,I,~ ~~.(_.,_ __,-', . _./J _,A- ./ . ;~., SL:..: OCCUPANCY ~·v1. if/I 'Lf¿:'-"L~~t"S:: ZONING L.} (~Y ,-- ¿/ '.' __~~_L___ßLOCK 3 ADD ITION C i.. e /7 4// /II ~ .J ,.m i '!: f: --.Lê -(f/ 7 FLOOR AREA 75-0'" EST. COST'J7S-o~ c:.:.- ." .-. ". ~~ .-. .-- REpl\ In : ~:.lL.___._.____. ..__ . r'\ K. NE~! ~E.T: PAVED CURB & GUTTER OTHER . -;"'.:; -.f:~',:,' '.' ,~,* ~~ *:1: * :,,",*. .~ -;.: ** * ** ** ***'k************ ** ******* ***.*** ***** ** ***** *'!r ******** ******************* LOT EXTERIOR ~':ALL ') ROOF "7, ..") os" :\ '.,'>-..~':' * * 7': ** *** *..~**** **** ************* ***** ***** *** _;; ***** ******** ****'k************************* . " .' ;. . . INS IDE BRICK PERCCiTl.GE Jj-}? ',~OOD SIDING y,1:=TAL OTHER --- 0 I(#JElfs-lc!'~s ~;!OOD SHINGLE CO~1¡POSITION ---- BU I L T UP tJ1 E-r AL OTHER , . .' " '-..----~~-¡-:--.? >-C} .~ ::. f~' RJNT Y j·fKå :.: ~~ Y f\ R 0 NO. OF ROJ~"1S , . J.. - ,...:,. ...-..l ~ ..:.-,t...';"*~.L.*,E_ _"'...L.~t.....\.,*.t.....l.. ~* *,t.*";'**_~. ...~ ~**_" " ..1.. · ***** -:.' . .**** *. '*...,;,..*..... ~* . * r ~ -:..**** ~,-'--_;, "l-**-+~-:"-L*":'-~"¡"~1-..:.**.r..._-,- _. " ~,,^' .... <T. ~ .. ~ ~ ^ " " ^ '" ~ ^ ^ ~ . ^ ". " '. ~ '" ..-oe.. x .. r. 7<' '" . -.r... " ~ ... '1< ~ ~ ....,,, ~ ^ A ^ ~ ".., ~.~~'.~:;s~ . ." ..... '" . . .'~ . . ~: D t T 10 ¡.¡ . ur : L I T:I..E;~.~.:. ;'r:~;:~:~;,:~{ c.:'::';, ,... JL;~\G DEVELOPER pr:tJ-R;\TJ.\ PAID (I,f .¿lPpl iê~b.1,~2}.·;: ~\"~"<~.~-ž-~: . .- " ì: l:;~:'ì VA TE D TAP D!H D ..,,": .~, ;~:'><:. ':', rT () . /f <" & , . \ _ t", ., .'..: :...... , ,... '. '.: __~ ~. :.....' . . --...... . .,.~.. SEt~JER lAP Pi\ I 0 ..~:...~- ~~\ ~:'::. :~.~.<., ._"-:~ !:¡ {\ ) /' .) . _,~:--' ~".. ~ S t:' PT T r' .,... I". ~ ¡ 1/ -'(.', ;';.' - ~."'..' :.:. ~. ~ .::..'..- -7./ ;:....1 .ro'(;' ~.-.. - t... J.1v! r\J \ ì'\ '..~. .;: ,~ .-; ~~:... ~~, ,. ,,,'r- r-;'"". ~' ~c~. r n:""T En D· C PI 0(" -:' T '; ': {. .-.;.;. . :-,'r- \J.... !\¡'::-~(:-r~""-:"I 1\ If\ r~, ,:. ~. ~.. , :?\:-~ 'II.:. K ~ .)':'1 ,:, 'S"" . i.Ü:' . !J:.. Ii J. :1.';"'1'\,,\.. '. ~.p~ . - ~~ '!('\ .- ~.r-- r::' '/." .. ~ . . sue {"{};~~kT6R~ _ ;.~~~ . ~~1 ~~þP'"' ~. [:;: ~} t,·: GIN G . --,. ~¡c/ OF~ SHO~'JERS EL ECrR I C/',L ~ _ _C,;} ,;", :.' ;.~ ~ :; ¿ '... ';. '- E T 5 PLUHSING CONCR~TE HE:·~.T I NG l. IL\ I R ~ .J..: J- ,.:". ':~ -;"; * '.~ -k *1-: ** ** * ..¡.;---~ *'k * * -;... ** -)..- .;~':" **".'( ~.'-:: 'k )\' ~~ ** -x" ';.-; ..:.:~..~ * * -k * * '.~**:~"* *..;.....'.r: * * 'k * '.~ '* ** *"** * ** * 'k * ";~*~:,.. * ** * *",'.:'k *...'ç .¡~ * * *** ** '* ** * * ',' '~F:~ OF T: iI S PROPER¡'Y r\;,;¡:, T:'¡E U::OERS I GNED AGf-ŒE TO Co;CORI,j TO ALL AP?LIC/\8LE ORD PiANGi:S OF ¡' : -;-': UF NORTH RICHL,t\NQ H IL.LS} };r·;,-) liSSUf:IE . . 'oj ERT'( EITHER Ur:DEf-~NE:r;l-! OR f\bO'JE THE '-,~- '.:!".' ro'·;',; RS-,.....Drt·'Ç( rJ' r:- f.Í\r-. ...'¡ T¡'-C) U:··":-r-, t.ì"ì-ï~j t t .:. I; U (\.¡ r:j r 1..,. 0! V í 1..) i u L L {U K ::I\! ~ f\ ..) L)J' L ,j i . L //~ ¡ /" I '.- /' /,/ / /"'1 r ¿.;.' /./' ~/ __>;r' ~ " I /cL' /. -: " ~,./ --~' t /' ,...., (.,../'" /" / /' . '- y./ ". / - l.__ / . / / _..___.1 .-_.__ c_-4._~_---.._~_____.._____ / /... ,.,/ . /,::~. 4 . '"/- ~, /1 / . .~ -¡'/ é /' ~ /,-t;.-"} ~:..~~~-~ .~~~~ -~~ /-~~-{:Lc~~ /'J~'~~ ;:{.f l( () I 0 I ..' ,. - ALL RESPOnS 18 TL ITlES F.~r~ ~)/\:'1ASE TO Þ.NY AND ALL GROU;'~D. ·I-HEY SrL::l.LL .t\LSO ()E RESP{);\~SIBLE FOR ILLEGAL ¡\ C C C U i\ TIS C H ;,,).. G EO F R G ;..j THE I R N A¡'¡ E . Ý .. r 0.., T D r. l...' -;. 'u....' 0 t /""'),..' , j .!¿.~-~ /7 __ v ¡ , ,'J\ ,. :,_____ ~L_____:__ \_"'-- ..··...""....-·Sr' 0 /c' 1-\ L; ~ j :-:: t. ~ .. ..::-~; -(-)_-.---e:- .._~--_.. ---- /' ) P HOi'.1E -c0/ (".?-7--1----e. 5"---' j>^:/ 2 (( ¡~:. ; ~'.' L-: !;C J c.; () ........"..., ',,- City of ~rth Richland Hills, Texas , _~~_ 7301 N. E. loop 820 ~~ V PERMIT AND INSPECTION DIVISION PHONE: 281-0041 BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT No. DATE 19_ WITH THE PROVI~ION THAT THE UNDERSIGNED ERECT THE IMPROVEMENTS HEREIN DESCRIBED TO MEET ALL THE CONDITIONS OF THE BUILDING AND ZONING LAWS OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS LOCATED ON: NAME ADDRESS .. CJ :ë '" a u >- a:a .. o .... ." tÞ .. a. -¡ u Q) i:( Lot No. Block Addition On Side Street Between And In Zone .#Þ..... And Fire District Size lot Area Building No. Stories >- ï: ~ No. Rooms 2", ~ Material Exterior Wa1ls M ..! t: Garage :) Q ~ Use of Building > 6 Electrician: Z Dimensions Roof Material Interior Walls Tub or Showers lavatories T oHets Plumoer: Concrete: Heating & Air: .. E '- C) C. &It :ë t- Remarks: ') / w:i Þ- o Z Name of Owner Address Name of Architect, Engineer Address Nat11e of Contractor Address Iss1Jed By _--..-- Pian ¡ß.pproved By PERMiT CLERK Signature of O\Nn·er or i\'Jthorízed ,A.gent --------.-. TH'S PERMIT CONV~Y5 NO P:GHT TO OCCUpy ANY STREET. ALL~Y O~ S'O'WAlI<. O~ ANY P.'~f ,,;,REOF, EITHE~ E'i?ORARY OR ?ERMANENTl Y. ENCROACHMENT ON PUBLIC PROPERTY NOT 5PEO:"· CALtY ?f:.:(.\VfTFD UNDER lHE e.UIlDiNG CODE MUST BE APP~O\'EO 8'1' ìHf OT'oJ COU~K'L. Es~: rn::!ted Cost $ _______---.-Fees $ . DIST~H:HJTION: White copy and CoJd",nrod Copy to OfflCE,'feUow CDpy to APPl,c.~~n, P1n1c Copy to ASSfSSOff. . , , ; ~ '~-<!~,'~~.~-,.: ~~: ".... '--" ..,~ '~.¡';'.~~ .~- / t / /f' <II. ~ ~':. ....-r- - . 1 o· ~ fV) " J ""'"'w.~..... ~ ~- ~. .J/- \. s /...¡t ~ , 1', II ,/ '~~ 1 """ .~ al r ! ~ '1" I ð /,1 I. \i ~ I '1 1 (F' ) ¡ ~.~ I 'r . - ' i I H l~ ~ I Q'() <'(/ It: Ii i 'A - ~ ,.... ~ .~ ~.' \ ' ji ~~ 1 c ~ ':/ ,. I '" ~ ,.-.1 .. r. j ~. I ? ,\ · . · J' _....--._ .. I )-. , - of I <\ i I {¥ }' I ~. I; ~ t -, \ , ic ~ j 1 · ! ¡' ï I I l' t /.¡¡ ~ J Jr. \:J in'" II. r1 " '!, " ;: p ;; .' ~. . ~~.~J~.. '. I I J ~,¡ . ~! :ij . sit, , " ~ . k' _ -... _..;---~ . I~ 1', ~ .--------... . ' . -- . -- \ ~ I! -f i ~ ~: _- \\' ~ J ~l ~...- - .. " ..~~,. :- i U ¡ ~..~ i.- f :' . ,~-;;. '~. :/.'J I ;:Î ,~- \t~ j ~ ~~ ' ø _~ I ~:~. ,.~_ , i f' ~ " J 1.~_,-'.,..;~ ~ '. ...-' . i '.:...- 1 ~I ~ ~ , i .~ \ .~~Hf· 0 ! fi; ry ~ , I / ! / I /.. I f ./r ¡ /' j ,,/ .L/'· , N I ,~ \ r~ {¡ vJ ,'" ...;, ,0,' ..:.....t~,',· -. ',~.;, ,,' .:;....: ~;...:h '..;...:.; ~,...~" ;1 c\ I \\ DATE: 1/8/81 SUBJECT: Request to drill a well - Mr~ Paul R. Schmidt e DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Pub 1 i c \.\} 0 r k s well on his property. He shoul d be r:;:!.i~!:: aWJ re of the 200 ft. 1 irnit. . Mr. Schmidt requests permission to drill a water .110*;' .' I' e CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or Deny BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/ A NO ACCOUNT NUrt1BER: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . J ¿::J.nue.ry 7, 1981 Paul R. Schmidt 4716 Lariat Drive Fort iiorth, Texas 76118 City Manager North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ~ear 1~. Willi~s, I would like to reauest a permit to drill a water well for the purposes of mainta.ining improvements to my property. 'rhank you, ,>f- ' c:paJ Q £LtJ/ Paul R. Schrnidt 0,; T E : 1 :/19/80 ~ --------~t SUß,JECT: Use 'of ª---ºercentag~L fr::êi....,rhi ~e---Íe.e- +-0 ; rrrJ e.ment.-Ç..G-V€-t:P~-Þ.3n:--i~1... e DEPARTr·1ENT: Comml1nitv Cable Advi.sory Panpl BACKGROUND: r--1r. Dan Echol s has visi tpd Marl; :son, t"vi ~{()n~'~ tl, h11,O-e +-~H·~ c:i t y council has used a Dercentaae of the francnise fpp tn !,l1rrhÂ~Q egqirMent to inhance production o~ proqra~minq on the govprnment chan~pl- Artor ~ rlis~nssion the panel approved a motion to recommend that ~he city cQUnril h0P~~'f~ ~~o~rli~~ a percentage of the franchise fee to implement the city's 90vprnmeD~ rb~nnpl_ Thp panel would like to make the presentation at the fi.17"st c01.1ncil mept-iY10 irl.- January~ to better inform the council on this matter. .>i- " ·e ---- -----~---- ---.-- C 11Y COUr¡C IL I~CT IO(~ REQU I REO: Approval or disapproval_~f reco~~]?221t~S?Ð~_____ ------ - -'.- -., ....- BUDGETED ITEr'i: YES NO ACCOUNT NU~·18ER: -------------------------------~----,--------~------------~-------------'-------- . City of J{8rth Richland Hills, Texas TO: tflU\YOR AND CITY COlJNCIL DA'TE: November 19, 1980 FROM: Community Cable Advisory Panel SUBJECT : Request to Speak to the Council At our regular monthly meeting on Tuesday, November 18th, the panel approved a motion to recommend that the City Council invest a percentage of the franchise fee received from Blackhawk to implement the government cha~~el to inform citizens of North Richland Hills. ~k. Dan Echols, a member of the panel, would like to make a presentation showing what the city of Madison, Wisconsin has done to better inform their citizens using the government char~el. The panel would like to request this presentation be made at the cO\lncil' s first meetin'.j in Januar~{. ~xs. Beverly Riley Chairp'erson 1J1r!.,(J. (817) 281·0041 ! 4101 MORGAN CIRCLE / P. 0, BOX 13305 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 It; e TO: Chuck Williams, City Manager DATE January 5, 1981 FROM: Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Platting Cases to be heard by City Council January 12, 1981 PS 80-57 APPROVED PS 80-59 APPROVED Request of Forrest Johnson for final plat of Lot 1, Block 4, Hewitt Estates. Request of the City of North Richland Hills for replat of Holiday North, Section 7. PS 80-63 APPROVED Request of College Hill Church of Christ for final plat of Lots A & B, Block 28, College Hill Addition. e I' To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records e e e ( DATE: 1-5-81 \ \ SUBJECT: PS 80-57 Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 4, Hewitt Estates DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoninq BACKGROUND: This property was already zoned IF-12 but had never been plattpd Mr. Forrest Johnson wishes to build a 2855 sq. ft. home on thi~ property He has agreed to all the Engineer's comments and has requested that he be allowed to signa covenant for the pro rata for street improvement. Mr. Johnson asked me what· the city·s feelings were regarding not opening up Frankie Street. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or Denial of Final Plat. BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X AÇCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ~--~-~-----~---~-~--------~-~~---~~----~--~~~-~---~-~----~--------~~~----~~--~- ~,'''' e (e .e ,- \ .....~ CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL OATH OF OFFICE ( \ l~ \ ~ . NINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, DECEMBER 18, 1980, 7:30 P. M. The meeting was called to order at 7:33 P. M. by Don Bowen, Acting Chairman, in the absence of the Chainman, Carl Gr field who was out of town on busin $. PRESENT: ACTING CHAIRr~AN SECRETARY ~1Er¡lB E RS Don r~ orie Nash \onni e Ne\vrnan George Tucker ABSENT: CHA I Rr~AN Carl Greenfield FF PRESENT: AS . CITY MANAGER & Z COORDINATOR Dennis Horvath \'landa Ca 1 vert Mr. Bowen administered the oath of office to new member, George Tucker. CONSIDERATION OF THE MI OF NOVEMBER 20, 1980 Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Bowen, to approve the minutes as written. PS 80-56 PS 80-57 This motion carried 2-0 with Mr. Nev®an and t/tr. Tucker abstaining since they ,,¡ere not present at the November 20th meeting. Request of Forrest Johnson for preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block 4, Hewitt Estates.. Request of Forrest Johnson for final plat of Lot 1, Block 4, Hewitt Estates. Forrest Johnson, 2609 Willow Park, Richland Hills, came forward. Mr. Johnson stated he had received the Engineer's letter and will agree to all 'the comments, but would like to have some clarification regarding the covenant. He asked if at some later date he would like to sell the property, \,¡hat about the covenant. Mr. Horvath said the covenant would run with the land and the new owner would assume the e e' ( e i \ - ..< \. ' Page 2 .. P & Z Minutes December 18, 1980 PS 80-56 APPROVED PS 80-57 APPROVED ( \ <.. responsibility of the covenant. Mr. Johnson said that was fine with him and he agrees to all the Engineer's comments. ~lr. Ne\vman asked r1r. Johnson if he \~laS aware of the proposed thoroughfare that was in the planning stages to go down ~leadow Road. Mr. Johnson said he hadn't heard anything about it. Mr. Bowen showed Mr. Johnson where the proposed thoroughfare would go. Mr. Horvath said it would be a five lane with a continuous turning lane, but it might narrow down to four lanes close to the housing area. Mr. Johnson said he was proud to learn about this, but he didn't feel it should hinder the platting of this property. He said that regardless what he does with the property, it would need to be platted. Mr. Johnson said he would comply with all the Engineerts comments.and would sign a covenant. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to these requests to please come fO~Jard. There being no one to' speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. ' t1r. Ne\\/TTlan moved) seconded by t'lrs. Nas h, to approve PS 80-56 subject to the Engineer's comments and that he be allowed to sign a covenant for the pro rata. This motion carried 4-0. ~1rs. Nåsh rnoved, seconded by f4r.. Tucker) to approve PS 80-57 subject to the Engineer's comments and that Mr. Johnson be allowed to sign a covenant for the pro rata. This motion carried 4-0. e e e Forrest D. Johnson 2609 Willow Park Fort Worth, Texas 76118 January 5, 1981 Planning and Zoning Department City of North Richalnd Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 Fort Worth, Texas Re: Lot 1, Block 4, Hewitt Estates PS 80-57 Dear Sir: I will comply with the engineers request to sign a covenant agree1ng to pay pro-rata cost for street improvements. The final plat has been corrected showing proper zoning and the surveyors address. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, ~~'.D?~ Forrest D. Johnson Ip e ( City ofJXõrth Richland Hills, Texas /'\ -~!~ --~~.~ \L f ( ~ December 17, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills Subject: 3-949, Hewitt Estates, Lot 1, Block 4, PS-80-56·,57, Preliminary and Final Plans Dear Commission: e The owner will be required to give the City a signed covenant running with the land to pay for the improvements at such time that the streets of Hewitt and Frankie are built based on actual coustruction costs, or pay pro-rata share of $53.85 per front foot for a total length of 205.02 feet on Hewitt Street. and pr.o-rata share of $40.15 per front foot for a total length of 204.26 on Frankie Street. Sincerely, q ) , .... '..... 1 .~ ~ ... I ..,j,;.) i! ¿(( ~J t Ju!h.Le:...-i4 í·~ (¿-) ¿vv . f Allen Bronst'ad Director of Utilities pb e (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N,E, LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118 í \ '" , f ( e KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort \Vorth-l)dll<1s December 10, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-949, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, HEWITT ESTATES, LOT 1, BLOCK 4, PS 80-56, 57, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANS We have reviewed the captioned materials for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. The Surveyor's address should be shown on the final plat. 2. We would request that a sanitary sewer manhole and stub-out be provided at the end of the proposed 6-inch line in Frankie Street for future extension, rather than a cleanout. e 3. The Owner should be required to escrow his pro rata share of future street improvements on Hewitt Street and Frankie Street, or agree to sign a covenant running with the land to pay for the improvements at such time that the streets are built based on actual construction costs. We would estimate construction costs for one-half of a proposed 40-foot pavement section in Hewitt Street at $53.85 per front foot for a total length of 205.02 feet. One-half of estimated costs for a 3D-foot pavement section in Frankie Street ;s $40.15 per front foot for a total length of 204.26 feet. 4. Our records show that this lot is zoned IF-12 rather than IF-9 as shown on the plat. However, the plat appears to be in compliance with the provisions of both zoning requirements. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~~. e RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R\~A/ljc cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 ~. Page 3 p & Z Minutes December 18, 1980 (~ ( Mr. Dunaway said he had receive letter and they agree to all e comments, but would like to comment on it s 3 & 4. He said on #3, they do have city Jer for all the tracts, but there may b extensions on the site for city sewer an maybe some private se\'/ers; #4, they do aO\~ the extension for the water line. M. Dunaway said they feel it would be bett to go down Emerald Hills Way with the w er, but when they come in for a final plat they \vill talk \vith r~r. Bronstad:. Utility Di~ ctor, and see if he will agree to this. '. e PS 80-58 Request of f,1ike A. Blubaugh for prel iminary plat of Blocks 1 & 2, Campus Hill Addition. Mr. Jim Dunaway, Consulting Engineer, forv¡ard to represent r~r. Blubaugh in request. (e T ker asked what they plan to do with property. .r. Dunaway said they plan to use the south- east corner for office use and the south't¡est corner for office and retail space, but it would not be like a 7-11 store. . " :!.' t¡1r. Dunav¡ay said they have a problem "'lith the creek and it may be the last tract to be developed. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, th~ Chairman closed the public hearing. Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Newman, to - approve PS 80-58 subject to the Engineer's comments being met at the time of the sub- mission of the final plat and that item #7, the 60 ft. R.O.W. be required. This motion carried 4-0. PS 80-59 Request of Dal-t~orth Dev. Co. and the City of North Richland Hills for replat of Holiday North, Section 7. (e ... . t Page 4 p & z r'li nutes December 18, 1980 / ~, \, \ . e Mr. Horvath said this is an administrative request) the tax office was having problems \tJith a repetation of the nun\bers of the lots and blocks. PS 80-59 APPROVED Mr. Newman moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-59 as requested. This motion carried· 4-0. PS 80-63 Request of College Hill Church of Christ for preliminary plat of Lots A & B, Block 28; College Hill Addition. Request of College Hill Church of Ch~·st for final plat of Lots A & B, Block 28 College Hill Addition. PS 80-62 Charles Owens, 6425 Martin 0 ve, came forward to represent the church in heir requests. He introduced Mr. Ferguson len Burns, and Hal Keel who were with hi · Mr. Owens said th church has been acquiring small tracts of and since the 1960's for future expans· n and they are having problems with the Bi' ôville tax office. He said they do not w t to exemp these tracts from taxation. (e lens said that by platting them~ they ho ~ to correct this. He said they have no · mediate plans for development. Mr. Owens said they agree to comply with all the Engineer's comments, but would like to comment on some of them. He said on #1, since their building sets on top of a hill~ the other land would be used for parking loi" and they would have no problem with the proposed thoroughfare. He said he didn1t think it would come that far, though; it would probably come through where the street is that is not dedicated. Mr~ Bowen said the Planning and Zoning Commission does not feel the church's pro- perty \~¡ould be involved in the thoroughfare. ( Mr. Owens said regarding item #2~ they furnished the city \~Jith a topa study and do not feel. they should be required to bear the expense of a drainage study at this time since they do not e e tJ D,l\ TE: 1-5-81 / ..2/ SUBJECT: ps 80-63 Final Plat of Lot~ A & 8, Block ?R, r.Ol1PQP Hill ~~~ition DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is several tracts of land purchased by Colleqe Hill Church of Christ which they wish to plat into 2 lots. They do not plan any expansion at this time. This platting is for tax purposes. They did not submit a drainage study since they do not plan any development. They said they would submit a drainage study at such time they come in for any buil di ng perm; t. P & Z agreed I:Jith thi sand if approved by tile Council the staff will require a letter on file stating their intention to complete this study before any development can take place. ...... .. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Ap~roval or Denial of Final Plat BUDGETED ITEM: YES .NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ...... . -\ Page 4 p & z r¡li nutes December 18, 1980 ( ( f;1r. Horvath said this is an administrati fA request, the tax office was h oblems with a repetation of umbers of the lots and block e r~r. Ne\'iTIlan moved, seconded by ~lrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-59 as requested. This motion carried 4-0. PS 80-63 Request of College Hill Church of Christ for preliminary plat of Lots A & B, Block 28, College Hill Addition. Request of College Hill Church of Christ for final plat of Lots A & B, Block 28, College Hill Addition. PS 80-62 Charles Owens, 6425 Martin Drive, came forward to represent the church in their requests. He introduced Mr. Ferguson, Glen Burns, and Hal Keel who were with him. e Mr. Owens said the church has been acquiring small tracts of land since the 1960's for future expansion and they are having problems with the Birdville tax office. He said they do not want to exemp these tracts from taxation. Mr. Owens said that by platting them, they hope to correct this. He said they have no immediate plans for development. r"lr. O~'Jens said they agree to comply \'ith all the Engineer's comments, but would like to comment on some of them. He said on #1, since their building sets on top of a hill, the other land would be used for parking lot'and they would have no problem with the proposed thoroughfare. He said he didn1t think it would come that far, though; it would probably come through where the street is that is not dedicated. Mr. Bowen said the Planning and Zoning CommissiQn does not feel the church1s pro- perty vloul d be i nvo 1 ved in the thoroughfare. .e t'1r. O\\Jens said regarding item #2, they furnished the city \'Jith a tapo study and do not feel. they should be required to bear the expense of a drainage study at this time since they do not .... (" '-.. Page 5 P & Z t~i nutes December 18, 1980 ( ( e plan any building. He said that at some later date, if they need to expand, they could have a drainage study done. Mrs. Nash asked Mr. Owens if they have any plans for the property. Mr. Owens said it is for future expansion which will probably be 2-3 years off. ~1r. Horvath asked Mr. O~\/ens if they \'Iould agree to meeting with the City Engineer to come to some agreement regarding the drainage. Mr. Owens said they would be glad to. The Chairman called ,for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to these requests to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. e PS 80-62 APPROVED Mr. Tucker moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-62 subject to the EngineerJs comments and subject to satisfying the city Engineer regarding the drainage. This motion carried 4-0. PS 80-63 APPROVED ~1r. Tucker n10ved, seconded by ttlrs.. Nash, to approve PS 80-63 subject to the Engineer's comments and the resolution of the drainage with the City Engineer. This motion carried 4-0. PZ - 80-44' - _.~- --." - ---" - ,..- Request of Bill Lightfoot and Doyle (The Channel Cat Restaurant) to rez a portion of Lot 2) Block 50, N ' st Addition, from its present classi· ion of Commercial to a proposed cla . lcation of Commercial- Specific Us e of Alcoholic Beverages. This \ .~er'ty is located at ~249 Davis Blvd. - Bill Lightfoot came forward. He said his restaurant will not be open on Sundays. Mr. Bowen asked if this wasn1t previously Dos Vecinos Restaurant. Mr. Lightfoot said it was. -__. ___~.::.;_~~_-::",,:-.....::~~~r.J:.r-_.._.,__~,~-~·"":;t-~,~~~~~ &. .~- -_...~. '- :.D"",.~w_r... ........_____~.a. College J{¡// Church of Christ e 6200 College Circle North · Fort ~Vorth, Te,).:as 76118 · Pholze: 817-281-8,3,'j4 January 5, 1981 Planning & Zoning Department 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Subject: Preliminary and final Plat of Lots A & B Block 28, College Hill Additìon Dear Sirs: I am writing in response to the letter from the city engineer, Richard W. Albin, dated December 11, 1980, and the vote of the Planning & Zoning Commission on December 18, 1980. e It is our intent to comply with items 3, 4, and 5 of the engineer's letter; and the plat is being amended to comply with these items. I have discussed items 1 and 2 with Richard W. Albin, of Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. The primary reason for filing of this plat is to incorporate those lands purchased' by the church for future expansion into one plat. The church is being taxed by the state, county, and school taxing authorities. This plat is needed for tax relief purposes, and no development or construction is anticipated at this time. The proposed route of the "Central Thoroughfare" south of the st. Louis South~.¡estern Railroad would certainly have an impact on the drainage of the proposed plat and future development. We would request a wai ver of i.tem 2 - drainage study for the aforementioned reasons. We are in agreement that a drainage study will be needed when expansion and construction of church facilities actually takes place and would gladly sub- mit such a study with the application for a building permit. Respectfully submitted, (i, It- :/~v~ lJ.,.t·l/Jt-~~_______ Don Ferguson Chairman Planning Committee College Hill Church of Christ mew ---"'__'_'-''''~'ß_ _ ~1IIa'e ~~,!~:' 1M _ØNJ.,-"J>UI "DJIHIIl. 111...... AJ _~. Jim J .K.U _ .L! A_ um1"_" M Ir'-~ ¡STEk{S ELDERS DEACO:\S Rubert Fink}' Betton Green Don Hazelip Arthur Holl~y Jim Ho!e B()b Jenkins l:lrry ~1ichener Par Pennington Ed Sharp Gary Stevens Jimmy Still Ad rian ~. OO(!s PulpÍt - Larry C:l!vin Shcph~rdjng - Howell Kt:e!e Educ.1tion - D.1Vid Giddings Youth ~ Robert Finley De.l n Bing~L.lm R. E, Bullard H, D. Keele T¡n~y SJ.msill Rill Ri~sers TorrH11~' Blackburn Johnny CO\~'ky EJ Culberson Don Ferguson e e e TEXAS ELECTRIC ) SERVICE COMPANY December 9, 1980 Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Dept. City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Ms. Calvert: Texas Electric Service Company has reviewed the proposed replat of Lots A & B, Block 28, College Hill Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. Additional easements are requested as shown in red on the attached plat. If we may be of further assistance, please call. Yours very truly, . . .' / 1',. ! /~'.j <1?~u¡a¡;t II ¿f~ Wm. G. Stewart, P.E. Commercial & Industrial Supervisor WGS: 1 fj cc: R. L. Fain ;;:"') ,) "l t::,._ ,.' :,.; ?/ :,;.{ \. ...~/ .~) - -- e ( \. KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC, CONSULTING EÌ'\GINEERS / Fort \Vortl¡-I)i1llas December 11, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-804, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, COLLEGE HILL ADDITION, LOTS A & B, BLOCK 28, PS 80-62, 63,-PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANS We have reviewed the captioned materials for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. The preliminary routing of the future "Central Thoroughfare" reveals that a portion of this platting could be in conflict with the Thoroughfare alignment. One of the proposed routes presently under study would run south of the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad eastward from Rufe Snow crossing the Callo~ay Branch, intersecting College Circle North Drive and then turn north crossing Watauga Road and the railroad at Fox Hollow Lane where a railroad crossing permit has already been obtained by the Developers of the Fox Hollow Addition. Although the Thoroughfare alignment could possibly be shifted to miss the northeast corner of Lot A, further study is required to accu·rately define the relationship of this property to the Thoroughfare route. 2. A drainage study should be provided showing the drainage areas along with the associated runoff calculations as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. Although this development is located on a hill, the impact of runoff from this property onto adjacent land should be evaluated by an engineering study and presented on the plans. 3. We would request that the zoning for this property be shown on the plat. A portion of this platting appears to be zoned local retail and the remainder IF-9, Specific Use, College. 4. Building lot lines for Lot A should be shown on the plat in accordance with the requirements for the specific zoned areas. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3'367 · ' .. e - tit " Planning & Zoning Commission, December 11, 1980, Page 2 5. Fire hydrant protection coverage has not been shown as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ,~ P.E. R~~A/ljc cc: Mr. Allen Bronstaq, Director of Utilities e· e e -. . -12-29-80 / :3 SU8JECT: . . Light Fixtures at Richfield Park . . DEP JtqTf-!ENT: Parks/Recreation BACKGROUND: For the past two years the light fixtures at Richfield Park have caused great concern with myself, RYA officials, and several hundred parents whose children participate {n organized s~orting ~vents at Richfield. The' fixtures were donated" ': , sever~l years ago by· various organizations and were installed the quickest and cheapest way possi~Je. Many consist of various lengths of pipe telescoped together_and spot welded. 'One one occasion one of the poles snapped during a game which could have" ha~ tragic ~esults.· The concerete base is not sufficent to support.some of the poles and· corrosion is beyond maintenance. One pole we inspected had approximately 2 feet of rust piled up insiqe the pol~. The Parks Commission has voted in favor of committin " ", . ~.. the park and library flJnrl~ (tJnhlj(i~ptprl "ol"~tary contributions) to the rehëtbilitation of the lighting.system. Three bids were ~eceived to correct this situation; Tarrant Eleçtric Corp Danis Electric Co. Signlite Service 37,060.00 40t565.00 54,800.00 . I CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: - Approve bid submitted by Tarrant Electric 'Corp~ BUDGETED ITEr'l: YES f40 x . ACCOUriT rJUi,iSER: Park and Library Fund. .Fund currently has a balance of approximately $40'·'000..' $1 ,50Q· per month received from voluntary còntributions.. . ~----------~-~---------------------~-------------------------------~----~-~--~ .~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BID QUOTATION FOR~1 _idS submitted to the City of North Richland Hills for the below listed items shall be submitted on this form in a sealed envelope addressed to the City Secretary of North Richland Hills, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, Fort Worth, Texas, 76118. Bids shall be received not later than 10:00 A.t1. , 12-19-80 , at which time all bids shall be publicly opened and read aloud. The front of the envelope shall have the following information printed or typed in the lower left corner: 11810 QUOTATION ENCLOSEDII ITEM Ballfield Liqhtinq - Richfield Park OPENING HOUR AND DATE: 10:00 A.M.~ Dec. 19~ 1980 The prices quoted on the Bid Quotation Form are IIfirmll and "real II prices. The City of North R;chland Hills reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to re-advertise subject to notification. THE PRICES QUOTED HEREIN AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE OR BE HELD TO.CONSJITUTE AN ORDER. e --ÖU,l-\NT I TY UNIT DESCRIPTION OF ITEM BID ON PRICE TOTAL BID Baseball/Football Field Lighting Installaticn and Rehabilitation, Richfield Park, 7300 Chapman Drive, City of North Richland ~J7Jo60.oo Hills Copy of Specifications attached. I DATE: 12:--119-80 TERtf1S OF BID: 30 days rH3-t BIDDER NAr~E: ~;a.r"rant Elec-tric Corp. ADDRESS: 8 2 7 f~·. S 1 J:'v Et C1 i a. ~e 01"\ t V~ 01") t ~1, rr e ~c as 7 6 111 83L~-71+27 TITLE OF COMPANY OFFICER: 1- l~ :~ S i (} e -r 1 t SIGNATURE: ,.:\~-!- -Cl- .,.-.\ (' / \ / I , ¡ L:·...·/ : ". -.-, ~ '" ) r -- .--_. ( ,i "'- ,--) J.', \..,. 'J.. .G e It ~î i ~3 .P r 0 }) 0 S ~j.l i ~3 :~ e <2 0 n -t 11 :_~ ~-l ~) S d. :-np t i Oil. - t r: a t -t h ~~ e :;( i s t i lî<.~ V'i ll' e . corld ui~:·;. ¡.-)~Jnel:.::, é1Y1d lJr'ea}~er~3 ;~J.re l::lr"'ge er1ùug'rl -to ~::ccornrnodate the nevI lighting load . Therefore Vie C;:-èrmot guarantee the existing winè I co ·nell). it, IJ ~lrl e 1 S f aT1 c1 1)::-" e 8.K (~l"' t; · 4Î.i I!~! I ~;;;..I I... ~_1: :i:.I! : ::::::~ I~/'¡ J f¡¡~j i ! r~;::i I i I~l:~ I I....., ! 1...·.::;·,1 ir:~~~. ! ~~~:~.~ I I ~i~~',! ; h=:::1 i ir~:ji ¡¡~11 I¡~:~I ."..1, : Ë~;~< I ~¡:~I ."..: if~~~: ¡ '~{::::.! ; :~~:::: I~t~~i ¡ ;:i:..J i I ::.:: :'" . ;"":':'.'~ I¡if~i I ,.;-:. I m¡;~1 II~! i :::: 'I ¡ I:;:;; : ¡ ::~... ¡ .. : .,. .,' . ~'. ..., : :.4.:. ;~~:~ ' t\-;' '. ,·1 e "'.-. I _ \~t9s!Jr;~~ . / UN]TED STATES FIDEL1~~brGuARANTY COMPANY I. " - -.Y '/""<",! 1!Jf~~:;~~¿kd '.. -' . " ',I!J 9 6 ~ >-. <;.0 (A Stod{;~Company) BID BOND 80 NON U r.1 B ER .,...." ..,.. .............. ,..,........... ,..., .....,..,.... .......... ....... '...,... ,.. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT TARRANT ELECTRIC CORP. ......,.........,.. It........... t........................... ......................... ..... ... ........ .................................... ...... It... ......... It..... ...... ......... ....... ............. ......... .................... .."..",..",.......".,.,.."................,..",..........., ,.........".... ,..... ,. .......... ......, ,.... ..... of ....,... ..]:4:,Q ,r,t;, ..~~,º, r.t.b,,,,.. ,1', gf:Çª~"........ ,.. ..... ,.................................... ,....,..,......, ,..,............,........,....,..,..,.................. ...... .............................................. ....,........ ...,.. ,... .........., as P ri nci pa I , and UN I TED STATES FI DELI TY AN D , '. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, GUARANTY COMPANY, a Maryland corporation, as Surety, are held and firmly bound ..unto...........,.............,...........................,..,......................."....... .,.. ~.~,:r:,~.~". .~~, ~,~,~. ~~ ~.,'~ ~ ~ ~~,?",.:'f!:: ~~.~..... ,..,.."., ,...,. .....,..,... ....'.. ........ .....,..."".. ..., ,......" ...,.. ,.,.,...."........, ..........,.... .............. .............. ,...., ..,. a s Obi ¡gee, in the full and just sum of,....,............. ......,.........Ei y~...E~x:... .C.ent....Q,f...B,id,...C5,%)............,................................................... ~& .. .,...""."......""..."..,...,..".,..,........, ..."", ...'., ...... ,....,.. '..... ,...." ,.." ......................."......,........ ,....., '.... ....,........... ,....... ....',... ..,......', ,.... ............. ...........,.. Do liars, lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS. the said Principal is herewith submitting its proposal Baseball/Football Field Lighting Installation and Rehabilitation, Richfield Park, City of North Richland Hills. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that if the aforesaid Principal shall be awarded the contract the said Principal will, within the time required, enter into a formal contract and give a good and sufficient bond to secure the performance of the terms and conditions of the contract, then this obligation to be void; otherwise the Principal and Surety will pay unto the Obligee the difference in money between the amount of the bid of the said Principal and the amount for which the Obligee legally contracts with another party to perform the work if the latter amount be in excess of the former, but in no event shall liability hereunder exceed the penal sum hereof. . \ December 19, 1980 Si gned, sea led and de livered...., ..........." ...... ,..,...,.,.....""..."""...". (Date) ATTEST: TARRANT ELECTRIC CORP. fC't:~L' , , .. , . . . , . . . . . . .. , .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . , .. , . .... , , . . . .. . .. , , .. . . . . . .. , .. .. , . . .. .. .. .. , . . . . . . .. _ . . . . . . .. .. .. ., \ v ...t' } f ( . ¡ /' / .:6. X.;..:o, ;:.'f.-::. ;.\~~. J., ,).... ./:. . .'.... ,~..::. ,;..:. ..... ~.¿:. L :1. J.(. ;::-..............., / J?X.:...:.,.. ': .:~..:. .<.J.... ::.... .'.. .~..,'.............. ~\J.....~.;~~;"\. ....... ....... (SEAL) . . { U)ITEO STATES FIDEl.1TY AND GUiÜÎMHY COMPANY B.:..~.JL~ ' ~. ~.((~....!2~.... y r ' AttorneY-tn·fact .:.;:0 e- e e ¡, CERTIFIED COpy GENERAL POVVER OF ATIORNEY 89582 No.. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . Knosø aU Mell by Ih.ae Preun": That UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a corporation organized and exuting under the law. of the State of Maryland, and having it$ principal office at the· City of Baltimore, in the State of Maryland, doe. hereby constitute and appoint Sheryl A. Klutts of the City of Fa rt \.¡ 0 rt h ita true and lawful attorney in and for the State of , State of Texas Texas for the following purposes, to wit: To sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and a11 bonds, and to respectively do and perform aD1 aDd all acts and things set forth in the resolution of the Board of Directon of the said UNITED 5T A TES FIDEUTY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a certified copy of which is hereto annexed and made a part of thia Power of Attorney; and the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, through ua. it. Board of Directora, hereby rati6es and confirm. all and whataoever the Mid Sheryl A. Klutts may lawfully do in the premiaet by virtue of these praenta. In Wilne.. Whereof, the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY hu cau.ed thia inatrumeDt to be sealed with its corporate seal. duly attested by tbe ailnat'Urea of ita Vice-Pteaidcnl and AJaialant Sec~ta.ry, thia 4 t h day of ~·1ay . A. D. 1979 UNITED ~ATES FIDEUTY AND ~CUARANTY COMPANY. (Sisned) Thomas A. Zecha B". . . .. . . . . · . .. . · · . . . . · . . . . · . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yice.PraùÜ1IL (SEAL) E. D. Bunce ......... .......... ............ .............. ........... (Signed) AuutGM SecrekJ.1y. STATE OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE CITY, -} as: On this 4 t h day of r\1ay , A. D. 19f 9 ' before IDe personally came Thoma sA. Ze c ha , Vice-President of the UNITED STATES 'F1DEUTY AND GUARANTY COMPANY and E . D . Bun c e ' Assistant Secretary of said Company, with both of whom I am personally acquainted, who being by me severally duly sw orn, said that they, the said Tho mas A. Z e c h a and E . D. Bun c e were respectively the Vice-President and the Assistant Secretary of the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed tbe foregoing Power of Attorney; that they each knew the seal of said corporation; tbat the seal affixed to said Power of Attorney was such corporate seal, that it was so fixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, ;lnd th at they signed their nam~ thereto by like order as Vice-President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of the Company. 82 1\ly commission expires the first day in July, A. D. 19........ (SEAL) (Signed) ~1 a r ~ are t r·t. II u r s t ......... .... ..... ..... ....... ................... ...... Notary Pu.blic. STATE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE CITY, } Set, I, ',1 i 11 i am ^ 11 en, Clerk of thf' Superior Court of Baltimore City, which Court i. . Court of Record, and haa a seal, do hereby certify tbat Mar gar e t r1. II u r st. . , E&quire, before whom the annexed affidavits were made, and wbo baa thereto 8u1;.cribed hi. name, waa at the time of 80 doing a Notary Public of the State of ~tary)and. in and for the City of Baltimore, duly commissioned and sworn and authorized by law to admjni9t~r oath, and. take acknowledgments, or proof of deeds to be recorded therein.. I further certify that I am acquainted with the handwriting of the eaid Notary, and verily believe the signature to be his genuine signature. In Te.timony Whereof, I hereto set my hand and affix tbe &eat of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, the same being a Court of Record, this 4th day of May , A, D, 19 79 . \-1 i 11 i am ./\ 11 e n (SEAL) (Signed) . .......... ...... ........ ....... .... ............................ Clerk 0/ th~ Superior Court 01 Bcùtimore City. FS 3 (6-77) "--':'. "''' .. t\.-'~ CITY OF NORTH kICHLAND HILLS ·BID QUOTATIon FORì'1 _idS submitted to the City of North Richland Hills for the below listed items shall be subnlitted on this form in a sealed envelope addressed to the City S~cretary of North Richland Hills, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, Fort Worth, Texas, 76118. Bids shall be received not later than 10:00 A.f1. , 12-19-80 , at \'lhich tirn2 all bids shall be publicly opened and read aloud. The front of the envelope shall have the follo\'/ing information printed or typed in the lower left corner: "BID QUOTATION ENCLOSEDII ITEM Ballfield Liahtinq - Richfield Park OPENING HOURANDOOE:10:OO A.M~~ Dec.. 19",1980, The pr'ices quoted on the Bid Quotation Form are IIfir'mll and IIrealll prices. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to re-advertise subject to notification. THE PRICES QUOTED HEREIN AND ACCEPTANCf~OF THE BID BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE OR BE HELD TO CONSTITUTE AN ORDER. QU/\NT I TY ,e UNIT DESCRIPTION OF ITEf'1 BID ON PRICE Baseball/Football Field Lighting Installaticn and Rehabilitation, Richfield Park, 73ûO Chapman Drive, City of North Richland Hills TOTAL BID ~~;Jl ') , ;; SS . OJ 1 I i j t 1 Copy of Specifications attached. :J e e ~~ ~l. d e r 0 ~) 0 S '-11 L 0 I' Ô. ~:. s cr· i ':J t .i 011 0 L \·t 0 r }: t 0 be; -, e r t' 0 ]: · ~'n f) cl . DATE: DeCO~;lbcr 19, 1~)¡J) TERÎ~S OF BID: Sec .?roT)osal 81 DOER NÞJ~E: Da,n' s }~18ctric COi~n)all..7 ADDRESS: 11 ') ..; :\ 3 \~ CJ 1 c J.~:l d 0 JJ~·lJl ::; 1\ I") 11.n.~ t 0 t1 " ~ )':. 7 SJ} !.~ ;~.(' .! L - :'.? ";-~. :: ~? TITLE OF COjtiPJ\NY OFFI CER: SIGNATURE: L' '~J-1)- r1 -:,' ~. ~ .9. n ,.~~ CL~ ']. -c,' \.~ C l"J í.) ,r. ( / . I / (;~ i ./ , ¡' . ~~'., .,1 .' /'./ . .-', ¡ .. ....., . ... , y _...i-" /. , I l / '.'"' I' '. . ." .~ " / / 1: ",.' ( i / 'if,:! r. . /.. " I \ I' . -:/ ',(~ .---- . / t,: ." .. y , .0/ "", { , . , . {.' f". ,",',,~ v - "J I .. 'I" ',1 t/ ~ e ~) Proposal Proposal No. FROM DAN'S ELECTRIC CO. J 105 A3 COLORADO LANE ARL/1VGTON, TE'.,YAS 76010 274-9599 Sheat No. Date 18 Dec. 3') Proposal Submitted To Work To Be· Performed At Name City ')f NOl'tl1_ Fl~hl3.nd Hil~~__ StreeL___Ri_chfield Ball Park Street________ __ City State City_______ - ------------_________ __________._____ Date of Plans____ State_ . _______ ._.h________________ Architect_____._____.__.____ T eJephone Number _ -____._H____________________~_____ We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of Ba::òe ball fi eld l:L-;bt ing Richfi e Id Par;;:. L'Çtke dOlm 31 x: lxi s tin:::: li c~ht nole s ':1aseball field :1'1. Install six ne~'T ':Joles and IL"ht fixbœes as sDeclf1ed [11 >-;e 1 general sDeci-ficf.ltions. Install extra cross arms and fixtlJr<;s c.,oles Al (1; Bl. ShTitch leg to CallS from base'8all fieJri /1 "m-T9r"holJSe. Install extr. er)oss a:rms 8.nd flxt~J_r'es olesJ.~\.2 B2 -.\.~,·B· si-:,\Ttcr} lQ(~ to corne :f~roL1 1)f{s8t)all E'ié::ld ,f2 -om-Jerhouse. Install extra cross ar~1S and f:tzt'1res "Ooles BI-1._:':.I1. sHitch leg to come from baseba11;'fjeld fit -';o!"'(~rhouse. Ircstall e:xt:r>a ~ross '-.:Jr ~'r¡ 0 aYì rl D 1- X+- 1 J. r 'j S ~-. 0 ] t""'\ 0 L.\ r' ~ r' d - T -j -1- "' 1...... 1 p'''' ..L Or. ,....,. "'n ""'\ t':¡ ,'') (' r(ì ;"" c.) co e ~-, C) l 1 t~ l- (::::.1 ,-~ './. 3 r.::::t...:.....:) l.l-..A, 1 -. u,_ t....... I..' _,c.:;ù ";'.1.::),L.)."), Üi/IJ...Lv(,.t.! .,":;:-,1./. ",'_J:.!...'-":'. .L,-)u.l :".1,..>.0...) "._'::.L-"... .._,-./-.-\..LT. Do,{orhous('3. TJreck out exist:i~ jncan':J_8sant fi TC1œes all noles fields 3 2: L~ and poles BS,AS and reDlace Hith r1et.al hali(~;~~>ixt:u'e3 as sD8cif'ied for Gacl o1e. HeY-:t:l:r- cf e:dsting feed to -coJ_es ()r s\fitch le~s 'n rol(~s 'i,Jill be all extra char)P-e. All material is gü'aranteed to be os specified, and the above work to be· performed in accordance with the drawings and specifìcations submitted for above work and completed jn a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of ¡'ourt'! l'housand Five Eun(.h'~d S:j:<:t·>~¡l:'L'.'·O -_:'_--<'Yo/Ln Dollars($L~O,SS5.')o ¡. with payments to be made as follows; ?ro:~;;I'(-,)3S clrD.".tlS to jO~Jade aD D8rcoat8.~e cf ';Turk comploted. 1 »)~ to be ~:<:ll d_ on C OY:1P 1 '8 t i on. 0 r l'Tor 1<:. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, v.¡ill be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate, All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work, Workmen's Compensation and Public liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by -Dan t s T~ 1 e c t I") j c J err--¡ J 0 rcJ:"lrl Ins j\, 7 en c- ) / J Respectfully submitted /~1:' ,. '(~ '!L¿¿¡¿Lf---./ .(/ Per Note - This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 3 Q days ACCEPT A~!CE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifìcations and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as speciFìed. Payment w¡¡¡ be made os outlined above. Ace e p t e d __n_ __ ___._____.________ Signature___________________H__ -- -_. --..----.- ------ -'-'-- .-.._- .~-- D ate .._. ___...________.__ _.____.____.______ _____ -- . '_._------~-----_.------ .---- --- Signature________,____._u____--,--_____ FORM 1030 THE ODEE COMr:>ANY, PUBLISHERS. DALLAS £ -4.J Proposal Proposal No. FROM DAN'S ELECTRIC CO. 1105 A3 COL01?ADO LANE ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76010 2ï4-9599 Sheet No. Date Proposal Submitted To Work To Be Performed At Name~_~ Street City_____ _ ___________ Sta te_ Telephone Number ________ - " Street . ' ~rj . ~ City ----------_State Date of Plans A.rchitect____.____ --_._-----~- We hereby propose to furnish 011 the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of II . ' . .. - ~.. .J . _ _ _ "', l - . ~ . ...."'"' . ,: r! All material is guaranteed to be and specifìcations submitted for as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of ., " Doll a r s ($ _,,~ f' ) . with payments to be made as follows: . - ~ Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, wi( be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate, All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by Respectfully submitted : ll/ / ø" ~~ _ ~ Per Note - This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifìcations and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted, You are authorized to do the work as specifìed. Payment will be made as outlined above. e Accepted - _______u_. ---------_..______________________________ Signature D a te_____. ____________ ______ ___._._______u____ ____________ Signature__________.__.. FORM 1030 THE: ODEE COMPANY, PUBLISHERS. DALLAS CITY OF NORTH f<ICHLAND HILLS BID QUOTATION FORr,1 ~ids submitted to the City of North Richland Hills for the belm'¡ listed items shall be submitted on this form in a sealed envelope addressed to the City S~cretary of Nor~th Richland Hills, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, Fort Worth, Texas, 76118. Bids shall be received not late}' than 10:00 A.~1. , 12-19-80 , at Hhich time all bids shall be publicly opened and read aloud. The front of the enveloDe shall have the follo~ving information printed or typed in the lower left corner: I IIBID QUOTATION ENCLOSEDII ITEr'~allfield Liqhtin~ - Richfield Park OPENING HOUR AND DATE: 10:00 A.M.~ Dec. 19~ 1980 The prices quoted on the Bid Quotation Form are IIfirm" and ureal II prices. The City of North Richland Hills reset'ves the right to reject any and all bids and to re-advertise subject to notification. THE PRICES QUOTED HEREIN AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE BID BY THE 'CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE OR BE HELD TO CON~TITUTE AN ORDER. e õOA!\ITI TY UNIT DESCRIPTION OF ITEr,1 BID ON PRICE TOT/\L BID I Baseball/Football Field Lighting InstallatiGn and Rehabilitation, Richfield Park, ! I 7300 Chapman Drive, Ci t~1 of North Ri ch 1 and I t Hills $ 54,8000001 Copy of Specifications attached. , DATE: 12-18-80 BIDDER NAr~E: Bill Myers TERt'1S OF B 10: 1/2 do~m 1/2 an completion Signlite Service ADDRESS: J q An (j-p 1 Dr; 'TP ',_J R11rl p~n1', 'rP~<3 S 76018 TITLE OF COr1PANY OFFICER: l\..~,r. r~'lilner- ,President SIGNATURE: .?( t/L 7l!; ~/>-- e ¡....- O,l\TE: 1/8/81 - Surplus Property /( SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation BACKGROUND: !1e advertised for bids for surplus park property (25 acres) located at the city boundry with Haltom City and adjacent to 1-820. One bid was received by Dale Hill Investment Company (F-Systems). The bid was for $14,000. Recommend City Council reject subject bid~ .... ' ~ e CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve rejection of bid BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO ACCOUNT NU~1BER: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e BID SPECIFICATIOn FOR DISPOSAL OF CITY PROPERTY The City of NOt'th Richland Hiìls ~'¡ill sell by sealed bids~ parcels of surplus City property described description as follows: ... -- - -- ." ..-. .... - __ _0 ___. ~ __.._. .._..__. -".- _ .... -- --. - . . - .. .- ...-- - TR~CT A: . ALL TflAT CERTAIN TP~CT OR PARCEL OF land lying and being situated in the T. AKERS SURVEY, A-19, Tarrant County; Texas¡- saìd tract being 18.5313 acres and further descrihed by metes and bounds as follo'\.vs: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North R. o. ~~. line of Inter- state Loop #820 and the Westerly R. o. w. line of st. Louis and Sou"th\'7estern Railroad; said point being the l!ortheast cor·ner of a tract of land conveyed by Chester A. Haltom to state of Texas as recorded in Volwne 3784, Page 543, Deed Records, Tarrant County,' Texas¡ thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes West, along said North R. O. w. line of Interstate Loop #820, 207.92 feet t6 the beginning of a curve to the left, radius of 3993.22 feet¡ thence ~~esterly along said curve to the left, and North R. O. \1. line, a distance of 386.81 feet to the end.Df said curve; thence'South 84 degrees 15 minutes West and continuing along said Nort~ R. 0- -11. line; 260.96 feet to a steel rod for corner; .thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 58 seconds' East, 788.54 feet to a steel rod; -thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 43 seconds Èast, 1299.32 feet to a steel rod in the said· Westerly R. o. ~f. line of st. Louis .and Southwestern Railroad; -thence Sou-th 31 degrees 33 minutes ~\7es·tr along said Westerly R. o. W. line of, st. Louis and Southwestern Railroad, 862.55 feet to the plac~"of beginning and containing 18.5313 acres of: land, more or less, as surveyed by David C. Moak, ~ísfêred Public Surveyor #156 in November 1972. ". ~ - " .. .. ,..-' ~.. , - -Sealed bids \1;11 be received until January 7,19.31. ~1ark the outside of the envelope, IISEALED BID FOR SURPLUS Cny PROPERTY TO BE OPENED AT 10:00 a.m., -JANUARY 7~ 1930.11 The City is selling this property by metes and bounds description onlj, and will ~onvey to ~he high~st successful bidder a gbod and sufficient deed for same. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the. right to refuse any and alì bids. Successful bidder \.¡iìl pay to the City at least ten (10%) per cent of bid upon notification öf being successful bidder, and the balance will be du~ one (1) week later. All bids to be~good for fifteen (15)' days "afte: bid, op2ning.· , ' SIGNED: DATE: !\ODF{ESS: TOTÞ.L BID: TELEPHOi'lE NUìr1BER: BID SPECIFICATION FOR DISPOSAL OF CITY PROPERTY ~ The City of North Richland Hills will sell by sealed bids, parcels of surplus city property described description as follo'tJs: 4IÞ TRACT B: BEING all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the H. A. TRIMBLE SURVEY, A-1520, and the T. AKERS SURVEY, A-19, Tarrant County, Texas and further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a steel rod in the R.O.H. intersection of the south R~O.W. line of Interstate Highway #820 with the Westerly R.O.W. line of St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad; thence South 31 degrees 33 minutes West, with said Westerly R.O. W. line St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad, a distance of 832.97 feet to a point; the P. C. of a curve right; thence in a Southwesterly direction with said curve right, radius 1602.95 feet, a distance of 359.45 feet to a point; said point being in a common City limit line of Haltom City and North Richland Hills; thence North 0 degrees 39 minutes 25 seconds East, with said common City limit line a distancA of 944.01 feet to ~ steel rod in South R.O.\·:. l-ine of Interstate Highway #820; thence with said South R.O.W. the following: NORTH 84 degrees 15 minutes East, 303.6 feet to P.C. of a curve right; EASTERLY with said curve, radius of 3643.22 feet, a distance of 344.25 feet to the place of beginning and containing 7.51 acres of land, more or less. e Sealed bids will be received until January 7, 1981. f1ark the outside of the envelope, "SEALED BID FOR SURPLUS CITY PROPOERTY TO BE OPENED AT 10:00 A.M., JANUARY 7, 1981.11 The City is selling this property by metes and bounds description only, and will convey to the highest successful bidder'a good and sufficient deed for same. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to refuse any and all bids. Successful bidder will pay to the City at least ten (10%) per of bid upon notification of being suc~essful bidder, and the balance \"i11 be due one (1) week later. All bids to be good for fifteen (15) days after bid opening. SIGNED: ADDRESS: .' / i " ...r"j ,~ DATE: TOTAL BID: L..: , --,' . :"j f'~; c~) i .... ~ . '. ¥-. ·...,¡..A. . _ ..(0.. TELEPHONE NÛMBER: ~ --- . ..,,{, e ~. City of J{ðrth Rich1and Hills, Texas ; ~ \ ,~~ \ \ /.-./ _s'-,;. \ f(L_ ._"~:_-=-=¡;:~ ~~K3\- /?~ I'''~/'\' ¡~...:.<, ,... , I " ¡ t \'! 'i November 24~ 1980 E-Systems, Inc. 1200 Jupiter Road Garland, Texas 75042 The enclosed Public Hearing will be published on November 30, 1980 and December 14, 1980. Since you Otm adjoining property Vie thought this may be of interest to you. ~~ " Sincerely, f , ~ ".. '? " . . I .,,....... ( ,<:/ Denniš ~trvá'&' ?;/./v~ As s i stant Ci ty r~ianager ds ,. ~ -6 \ . ~ ~' t . ¡ I I \ ~ -r.' ~'-~~e--r-- . : þ /y~ O,l\TE: Jan. 7. 1981 I --. / .~ SUBJECT: Installation of Traffic Signals e DEP ARTrJiENT: Public Works BACKGROUND: Estimate No. II for work performed in the month of December 1980, on Grapevine Hwy. e CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of Invoice No. 80-01436 in the amount of $3,199.84 Sharrock Electric, Inc. BUDGETED ITE~1: YES NO xx ACCOUNT NUMBER: General Fund Surplus (Currently there is approximately $1,2.10,000.00 in General Fund Surplus) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e INVOICE Sharrock Electric, Inc. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS NO. 80- 0' '""L í1 ~? Ç: ..' '-t \.J {:J 714 West Davis Dallas, Texas 75208 214/946-5116 Metro 263-8904 Ride herd 011 your wiring 'Woes with Willy Watt-SlinK" SOLD TO: SHIPPED TO: r City of N/Rich1and Hills PeOo Box 18607 NfRich1and Hi11s,Texas 76118 L- Attn: J.M. Madera,P.W. Job Site Same P.o. NUMBER DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS JOB NO, DATE Alan Bromsted 80-082 12/30/80 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL NUMBER ~ . Estimate # 2 $3~555. Estimate # 1 830. 4,385. Less 10 % Retainage 438. Total Net #3,947. :.."'-" 171. ~----p-' .~ ''1 '7. ~ !,1 " .. '.) " ..J 6'~ 57 " ..!-'" '1 /"'i:- t,.; ;..1 ~~ \ t .," .. \. e Shannock (ßnoð.., ~nc. E L BC T R I C.A LeO N TRACTORS 714 West Davis DALLAS, TEXAS 75208 MONTHLY ESTIMATE 946-5116 To: City of N/Richland Hills P.O. Box 18607 N/Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Job: Grape-Viyíe H''lY .-N/Richland Hills Attn: J.M. Madera P.W. Project: Estimate No.~From12/~1980 to12/3ID980 !f _/1 11--- T\Tpe A Fond .r¡ Jf jL " Total Work Rate Amount 2 2~ .00 4 0.00 1 4 s 00 4 '5.00 4 10.00 2 040.00 7 ? t Unit of' Measure ?-----P , ("f E n e Retainage This Month 355.54 Total Amount of Wòrk Done 3~~5S.~8 ~..LJ4~~. ~ J_ . A~r~ QO "-' v / , --J+ '''1 .0 · ~. d Less~ Retainage -'0)_, .0 I 4- ~_J 0 . J t 3,~)47 010 Sub-Total vlork This ì-1onth ~ r.:;f.)r; ~8 J , .-' _ J C ~...J Net for Month 3,199.84 Less Previous Payments t. ..i,", .I ," '.to -; (J I Amount due this estimate $ ~~~;-±e:;f 7~ :,;;,1 -t" J ./ "/" 'ì 1 I ..:.- ..^'- tt O/\TE: 1 / 8/ 81 SUBJECT: I'~ Contract payment - Precinct Line Road e DEP ARTf'!IENT: BACKGROUND: Ci ty ~1anager This item was agreed to between the cities of Hurst, North Richland Hills and Tarrant County March 1, 1980. Each paid 1/3 toward the engineering of widening and improving Precinct Line Rd. from Grapevine Highway north to a point south of the railroad tracks. Our 1/3 is $6,603.00 .... ' e CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ,A,pp ro va 1 fa t"' . paymen t BUDGETED I TErv1: YES Nj A NO ACCOUNT NU~1BER: This amount was set aside in General Reserve in this years budÇJet. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e General Fund ORIGINAL INVOICE CITY OF HURST FINANCE DEPARTMENT ~ : .roO) ...J 150~ PRE.CtNCr L'NE RD HURST, TEXAS 76053 r North Richland Hills City Hall 7301 N. E. Loop 820 DATE: 12/ 23/80 Fort Worth, Tx.76118 L TERMS: NET. 10th Quantity De'ScripTion Unit Cost Amount Billing for portion of Precinct Line Road Widening and Improvements per Contract Dated March 1, 1980 $1,707.33 TOTAL INVOICE TO: ~,. e GENERAL FUND ORIGINAL INVOICE CITY OF HURST FINANCE DEPARTMENT I~a PItEClNCT LIN! I'D HURST,TEXAS 76053 INVOICE TO: r L North Richland Hills City Hall 7301 N.E. Loop 820 Ft. Worth, Texas 76118 DATE: December 31, 1980 TERMS: NET, 10th Quont-ity Delcrlption Addition billing for portion of Precinct Line Road ~vi deni ng and Improvements per Contract dated t1arch 1, 1980 e Unit COlt TOTAL Amount $,4,895.67 _ 1-8-81 /~r Dr\~rE : e Land Use Plan DE P f\ R T f~ i E r 1 T : C i t Y r 1 a nag e }" SUBJECT: Resolution to approve appropriaticin of funds for Comprehensive BACKGROUND: This resolution will authorize appropriation of $37,250 for a comprehensive land use plan. Subject will be discussed in pre-council. . . ...~ " .... ' 'e ~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve Resolution BUDGETED ITEti1: YES NO X ,l\C CO U J'IT NUr':8 ER: 507-895-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - RESOLUTION it \ j WHEREAS, in order to promote tourism and to bring visitors into the City it is necessary to develop a Comprehensive Land Use Plan to make the City a more attractive place to visit, which the Council so finds. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1 . The sum of $ 37 ,250. be and is hereby appropri ated from Account No. 507-895-1, North East National Bank for the purpose of paying for such Comprehensive Land Use Plan. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1 981 . --- .... " ty1ayor,---City of North R-íchlanct- Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary, City of North Richland Hills, Texas Approved as to form and legality: Rex ~~cEntire, City Attorney----------- DATE: 1/8/81 /6' Comprehensive Planning Contract e SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: City Manager BACKGROUND: Some months ago in a special worksession, the Mayor assigned two Councilman (Brady & Wood) to accompany Chuck Williams to Terrell and Marshall. This visit provided concrete evidence of our need for the Comprehensive Plan -and the need for \'Iayne Snyder & Associates to be awarded this service. The funds for this contract will come from the Account #507-895-1 in the amount of $37,250. ..... ' .e CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUìV1BER: 507-895- 1 -----~---------~~-----------~~-------~-~---------------------~----~~----------- e CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN THE PREPARATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR TI-IE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT The parties to this contract are the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the firm of \Vayne \V. Snyder Associates, hereinafter referred to as the Consul taIlt · .Ao+ ' AGREE~IENrrs In consideration of the covenant and agreements herein con- tained, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: (1) EMPLOYMENT OF THE CONSULTANT The Ci ty hereby employs the Consul tant and the Consultant agrees to perform the necessary professional services herein- after set forth in connection with the preparation of a Compre- h ensi ve Plar1. (2) bCOPE OF üERVICE0 .._-~----~ TIle Consultant shall do, perform, and carry out in a satis- lac"L01.'j manner Hie services set 10t'til below recognizing that the lcted c:ttol'~.:iLl cl:~presellt the cOr:1bined eftot'ts of the City and t h t:.; CC) n s u 1 tan t · e \Vork Program rrhe Corl·sul tant s11all prepare elements of a Comprehensive Plal1 in cOI1formance \vi th the conteml)orary practices ancl more specifically adopts the work program as the Scope of 'Vork arld includes it as addendum #1. (3) TIME OF PERFO~MANCE -- The Consul tant agrees to cornmence work orl this proj ect within five (5) days after the City issues notification to pro- ceed. All work under this Contract shall be diligently and expeditiously performed. ..:Þ-. ' (4) COIvlPEl~S!lT ION e The City agrees to pay the Consultant on an invoice basis, s ubj ec t to a maximum amount of $37,250. 00. In rlO everlt shall the total fee exceed tllis maximum amount \vi t110l1t the prior \Y1--i tterl approval of the City. (5) METHOD OF PAYMENT T11e Consul tant shall be compensated monthly upon presenta- tion of invoices. The City shall make invoice payments amount- ing to contract amount. Consultant will present invoices on the 25th of each month and the City will make payments by the 10th of the following montll. e (6) aECOHD0 AND AUDIT~ The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, includ- ing personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by the City to assure proper accounting for all funds. (7) TERMINATION OF CONTRACT FOR CAUSE If, through any cause, the Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his obligations under this Con- tract, or if the Consultant shall violate any of the convenants, agreements, or stipula"tiôns of this Contract, the Ci ty shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving wri tten notice to the Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall, at the option of the City become the pro- perty of the City and the Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfac- torily completed hereunder. (8) ~EVE1{ABILlrl'Y That if any yrovision of this Contract is declared or found t 0 be i 11 e g:1. 1, u tl e n i 0 r c e a hIe a t 1 Ii Vi 0 r v 0 i d, the n e i t II e r par t y hereto shall be relieved of all obligations arising under such e provision, but, if capable of performance, the remainder shall not be affected thereby. (9) APPLICABLE LAWS That this Contract in no way affects the Consultant's obli- gation to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of t11e Federal , State, and local governments. All questions under tIlis Contract sllall be construed and resolved in accord- ance \vi tll trle laws of the State of rrexas. I~¡ V/ITNESS \VHEREOF, the va'1--ties hereto have executed tllis Con- tract effective , 1981. e City of NortllRicllland Hi 118 Wayne W. Snyder Associates Charles W. Williams Ci ty 1vlanagel· Wayne W. Snyder, AICP e City of ~rth Richland Hills, Texas "'. ,J ; "'/';' _;..~~ ; ~,~i... - .. . . . - --. '-. ~ - ~_:~-~::~;~~>:--=---:-..- \ ' ! '.' ~, 1 .., " ~ the comprehensive plan ~"~T '...."17 Q d' A! · A.... '"o/:;'~! .a ~Tne~/f. ~J n ",. ,'er >'. SSO:Cla'res ~' J Pla11ning 8L L1evelopn1cnt lVlanagement Consultants November, 1980 .e CONSULTANT'S UNDERSTANDING Page i SCOPE OF SERVICES PHASE I: COMMUNITY ANALYSIS 1 Task 1.1: Leader's Review Task 1.2: City Officials' Workshop Task 1.3: Development Analysis Task 1.4: Population and Economic Analysis Task 1.5: Physical Features Task 1.6: Land Use (1) Standard Land Use Code Survey (2) Neighborhood Analysis (3) Housing Condition Analysis (4) Urban Design Characteristics Task 1.7: Housing Analysis Task 1.8: Transportation Task 1.9: Community WorkShops 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 PHASE II: COMPREHENSf~E PLAN 6 7 7 'e Task 2.1: Land Use Plan Task 2.2: Housing Plan Task 2.3: Transportation Plan Task 2.4: Economic Development Plan Task 2.5: Community Involvement 9 PHASE III: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9 10 11 11 12 13 Task 3.1: Development Controls Task 3.2: Housing Strategy Task 3.3: Economic Development Strategy Task 3.4: Redevelopment Strategy Task 3.5: Capital Improvements Program Task 3.6: Community Involvement 13 13 13 14 14 14 PROJECT MANHOUR ALLOCATION PROJECT BUDGET 15 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PRODUCTS 16 V10I~I( SCfIEO(JLE 16 17 e NORTH RICHLAND HILLS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSULTANT'S UNDERSTANDING The decision of the community leadership to request an update of the Ci ty' s Comprehensi ve Plan has several moti va ting factors. Concern has been expressed about planning for the development of the northernmost portion of the Ci ty which was annexed after adoption of the previous plan in the late 1960's. The concern for this area consists of several interrelated issues. One is that there is no general land use plan for the area. Conse- , quently, traffic circulation, drainage, water, and sewer impacts cannot be anticipated. The community leadership and the devel- opment community are presently engaged in discussions about lot size, dwelling size and varying housing densi ties and their impacts. The City leadership feels that comprehensive planning for the northern portion of the City may resolve these questions and provide for more rational development related decisions. The Ci ty I S existing land use plan' was prepared over a decade ago. The sum of the small departures from the plan and unantic- ipated events over a thirteen year period will require a sub- stantial plan revision and updating effort. Annexation of addi- t ional areas and dWJelopment of major shopping centers are just two examples of physical changes that were not anticipQted in the 19(38 plan. -i- .e In conjunction with the major effort of updating the land use plan are rela ted issues of tax and financial impacts of the future land uses; impact of adjacent communities actions; vehic- ular problems; questions of annexation or future expansion of the City; redevelopment potentials exist in some commercial and residential areas that should be addressed; and ordinance review and revision is needed. 'e The Consul tant intends to utilize existing information to the maximum extent Possible. The City's close and long term working relationships with the City's engineering consultant is recog- nized and appreciated. The Consul tant will work closely wi th the City's engineers to insure that the planning activities will provide input into the engineering plans for water, sewer and other physical systems. e -ii- PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS The following is a description of the tasks to be accomplished in preparing a Comprehensive Plan for the City of North Richland Hills. The tasks are divided into three separate phases; Phase I: Communi ty Analysis, Phase I I: The Comprellensi ve Plan, and Phase III: Implementation. PHASE I: COMMUNITY ANALYSIS Task 1.1: Leader's Review The Consultants will meet,with City leaders to review and final- . .... .. ize the details of the project. Questions about methodology, timing and organization will be clarified at this time. , Task 1.2: City Officials' Workshop A one-day workshop \vill be held wi th appropriate staff, Ci ty Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission. This \vorkshop will preferably be in a retreat format so that concentrated dis- cussion and training can take place. The Consultants will dis- cuss the project wi th the Ci ty Officials and there will be thorough review of comprehensive plann~ng concepts, the role of the Planning and Zoning Commission, zoning and subdivision regu- lations and citizen inv()lvement in tIle planning process. rrhis will give both the Consultants and elected, appointed and staff officials additional ability to understand the planning process that will be followed in the p"roject and identify their respec- tive roles and responsibilities. -1- .e Task 1.3: Development AnalYsis The prior development of the City of North Richland Hills plays an increasingly important role in its present and future. Be- cause of this importance, effort will be devoted to analyzing and describing the development history of North Richland Hills. This task will describe the general history of the Ci ty and region, efforts and achievements in development and identify prospective key components of a development management program. 'e Task 1.4: Population and Economic Analysis With the 1980 U.S. Census now nearing completion, it would be a dUPlication of effort !9 undertake a detailed population analy- sis. However, the Consultants will compile existing population data with information from other elements of the community analYsis. The population component of this task will include population trends/prOjections, population density and distribu_ tion and review of major characteristics of the population; age- sex distribution, education, length of residency and household size. The econor.1ic analYsis is probably more important to future decisions about the City of North Richland Hills and the City's tax base. The analysis of the economic base includes; (a) identification of major employers, (b) identification of occupations of residents, (c) location of employment for resi- dents and (d) future changes which are likely to OCcur. The economic characteristics of the community will also be examined. These cha rac tel' i st i cs i nc 1 tIde consi clera Li.on of buy i ng power, income of r'esidents, oCcUpational characteristics and employ-. e -2- mente In the course of the economic analysis, the Consultants will survey attitudes and proposed plans of the business/indus_ trial community of North Richland Hills. Current economic development activities and resources will also be compiled. Task 1.5: Physical Features The physical features of the City provide contraints and oppor- tunities for future development. The Consultants will identify and analyze these features. They will include the fOllowing: a. topography and soils b. unique or special condi tions (topographical, flood plain, .subsidence, etc.) c. geological conditions , d. vegetation and wildlife e. noise characteristics f. railroads, highways, and other man-made features While planning in the 1950's and 1960's included consideration it was not until the 1970's that environmental and urban design of physical features in the preparation of comprehensive plans, concepts were developed enough to allow for effective utiliza- tion of their associated features. The Consultants will analyze these features to identify the effects on future development. Task 1.6: Land Use Land use analysis is the backbone of any comprehensi ve plan. The land use of the City affects and is affected by transporta- -3- .e tion, public facilities, schools, utilities, parks, and develop- ment policies. Four separate factors will be utilized in conducting the land use survey and in analyzing land use in North Richland Hills. These incll1de: (1) Standard Land Use Code Survey (2) Neighborhood Analysis (3) Housing Conditions Analysis (4) Urban Design Characteristics ~. ' e The information needed will be compiled in a single, intensive field survey conducted by the Consultants. The Consultants will design the necessary survey tools, develop the methodology for the survey, and conduct the survey. (1) Standard Land Use Code Survey: This coding technique is a standardized method of describing land use. It provides a consistent and comparable coding of the various uses identi fied in the field survey. A Standard Land Use Coding Manual will be adapted for use in North Richland Hills. Some elements of land use will be important in analyzing future development. These will be identified prior to the sur- vey and special attention given to those elements. One example is the vaca.nt I'lnci sui table for fu tnl'e development. e -4-- , (2) Neighborhood Analysis: As a city develops, it becomes more and more useful to under- stand the components that make up the city. These smaller geo- graphic areas are often referred to as neighborhoods. As part of the land use analysis, the various neighborhoods in Nortll Richland Hills will be identified and stlldied. Key physical features will be examined. Neighborhood analysis is beneficial in understanding the land use pattern of the city, but is also useful in planning for municipal services. Parks, fire protec- tion, police services, and solid waste collection are often di- rectly linked to neighborhood considerations. Such analysis can also assist in decisi?ns~r .about development and redevelopment of areas. By understand i ng the ind i vidual nei.ghborhooÇl charac ter- istics, zoning and other ordinance decisions often can be more easily resolved. (3) Housing Condition Analysis: Another issue of land use analysis is the examination of housing quality. North Richland Hills faces some problems of older, de- teriorating housing units. The extent of these problems should be analyzed to allow the City to plan for future housing needs. Data on housing conditions will be collected at the same time as other land use informë~ tion. This element is furtller discussed in Task 1.7__ (4) Urban Design Cl2él~rflcteri.stics: IJrl)Etn cles ign analysis f()CUSF;S ()n the ViSlléll appearance and form -5- .e of the Ci ty. Various design elements will be included in the land use survey. This part of the survey will identify manmade and natural resource areas which contribute to the quality of life in North Richland Hills. The survey will also reveal tar- get areas wi th problems which are detrimental to the Ci ty. Specific post ti ve and negati ve factors will be identified so that appropriate strategies can be developed. From the information collected in the land use survey, some spe- cial areas and activities are extracted. These include: e a. Developm~nt~Pressures in Northern Portion of City b. Highway 183 Commercial Corridor c. Industrial/Commercial Development e Task 1.7: Housing Analysis During the land use survey, information will be compiled on basic characteristics of the existing housing supply in North Richland Hills. These characteristics include; (a) housing q uali ty , (b) hous i ng type, (c) occupancy, (d) special design features and (e) neighborhood features related to housing. The analysis will further examine con~entration of various housing conditions, especially as they relate to characteristics of the households. The information will be prepared in such a format that it is useable in preparation of other administrative tools. Considerable attention is given in other tasks to related prob- lems of households and neighborhoods. The Housing Analysis will -6- address many of the issues of housing quality, supply, distribu- tion and availability. , Task 1.8: Transportation The transporta tion element of the Comprehensi ve Plan directly affects most of the land use decisions. Existing transportation characteristics will be examined including traffic volumes for major streets and highways, thoroughfare patterns and plans, street conditions and street standards. Major activity areas will be examined as they relate to traffic production. Trans- portation issues will be analyzed wi th the Ci ty Officials and discussed in community meetings. Current issues include energy costs, fuel shortages, low density development patterns, employ- ment and residential relationship, public transportation, and alternative transportation services. Task 1.9; Community Workshops The Consultants, with assistance of City staff, will conduct a series of community workshops to involve the citizens of North Hichland Hi lIs in the preparation of the plan. The meetings will be held in various loca tions in the Ci ty to promote the grea test amount of participation. Meeting schedules will be pUblished in the newspaper and sent out in utility mailings. A brief presentation will be gi ven a t these meetings descri bing the purpose and process of the project. The primary content of the meetings will be discussion with citizens about needs, prob- lems, and goals. A questionnaire will also be designed for' -7- e e e these meetings to provide more systematic input on key issues that the City would like to address. These questionnaires will be particularly useful in identifying capital improvement is- sues. A mailing list will be compiled from these meetings to inform the same people of the findings and details of Phases II and III. Input will also be obtained during these Phases, but through the mailing list, utility mailings, and the mass media, rather than repeating workshops. Other community imput is dis- cussed in Phases II and III description of the tasks. ~~' -8- PHASE II: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan will be prepared from information in the Communi ty Analysis Phase. It will include the goals, objec- tives, and policies described. Task 2.1: Land Use Plan The land use portion of the Comprehensive Plan is the result of land use analysis, the neighborhood invol vement process, the analysis of previous studies, involvement of the Planning and Zoning Commission and other City Officials. ~ The Land Use Plan will present goals and objectives for future land uses in North Richland Hi lIs, as well as policies about these uses. It will address issues of both public and private land. A Land Use Plan map will be prepared to graphically present land use goals and objectives. The Planning and Zoning Commission and other City Officials will be closely involved in this portion of the process because of the importance of the Land Use Plan in future decision-making. The plan is a guide to physical growth and development of the City. As a guide, it is important that it reflect the aspira- tions of the City, at the same time adhering to good planning pr.i nciples . The Consul tan ts wi 11 prepare al terna ti ve goals, objectives, and polici(~s for consideration by Vw Planning a!1':1 Zoning Commission, City Staff, and City Council. -9- .e The Land Use Plan will consist of three major parts; (a) General Public Facilities Plan. The General Land Use Plan will be both Land Use Plan, (b) Potential Redevelopment Locations, and (c) graphic and wri tten statements on the goals, Objectives and general policies for future land use in North Richland Hills. The Plan will be generally based on neighborhood development concepts that are included in the Community Analysis. Discus- sion of alternatives with citizens and the City Officials will center around the residential neighborhood as a basic pattern of urban development. Alternative patterns of development and the impact of various residential and commercial activities will be 'e Fiscal i~act, taxation issues, environmental factors, and analyzed to further the understanding of land use relationships. .~¡. " growth management will be part of the determination of land use goals and policies. The Potential Redevelopment Locations Plan will identify resi- dential and commercial areas within the City that could poten- t tally be redeveloped for other uses. Safne commercial areas might more appropriately be used for residential areas and con- versly, some residential areas may hold great potential for com- mercial redevelopment. Task 2.2: Housing Plan - objectiv(,~ and policies, for housing in the Ci ty of North Rich- The Consultants will prepare a plan setting forth major goals, land Hills. As the rn8.,jor component of land use in r1r¡~3t cities; -10- housing considerations are a vital part of the Comprehensive Plan. Likewise, housing issues often affect the decisions of City staff, City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion. Many of the zoning and subdi vision actions before the Ci ty Officials ei ther directly or indirectly affect housing. The City should have a clear view of the issues involved and the direction the City will seek in future housing plans. The con- tents of the plan will consider housing types, densities, dis- tribution of housing, and other supply and demand features of the housing market. '\ Task 2.3: Transportatiòn PÌan The transportation element of the Master Plan sets forth major goals and policies for movements of goods and people. It will include a major thoroughfare plan, current rail and any alterna- tive systems for facilities developed as part of the planning process. Task 2.4: Economic Development Plan Al though not formerly part of many comprehensive planning ef- forts, economic development considerations have rapidly entered the arena of City concerns. Concern for fiscal and tax issues, economic recession and public-private Federal programs have add- ed to the focus on economic development. The economic develop- ment plan includes goals for industrial and business development as they relate to the physical environment, consideration of the job market, and the roles and responsibilities of local govern- ment and the pri va te business communi t~.r. -11- 4IÞ Task 2.5: Community Involvement Summary information on the Comprehensive Plan will be prepared to obtain comm·unity inpllt. This information \vill be sent to those \vho attended communi ty workshops. The availabili ty of this information will be publicized through utility mailings and mass media. News releases on the plans will be prepared by the Consultants with appropriate graphics and photographs. A ques- tionnaire will be included with the summary to obtain specific responses. Finally, a communi ty meeting will be conducted to obtain additional input on Community Goals and Objectives. ...~ ' e - -12- PHASE III: IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Without consideration of implementation, the planning efforts in Phases I and II will have been somewhat in vain. Phase III will develop specific three to five year plans for addressing some of the goals, objectives, needs and problems identified in previous tasks. Task 3.1: Development Controls Development controls usually include Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. They may also be other regulations such as drainage or flood plain ordinanèes~:' The primary activity in this task will be review and revision of the zoning ordinanc.e. Other development controls will be reviewed and discussed as part of the Consultant's role in the project. Task 3.2: Housing Strategy A short-range housing strategy will be developed by the Consul- tants. It will set forth actions needed over the next three to five years to meet housing goals. Task 3.3: Economic Development Strategy The economic development tools and resources available to North Richland Hills will be outlined in this strategy, as well as needed activities by the City and business community in assuring future econotnic grO\v·trl of the comrnuni ty ~ \! a r i ()US S r101" t - ra n t.;e programs will be developed in 9.ddressing the goals and objec- tives identified in Phase II. -13- e Task 3.4: Redevelopment strategy Information regarding redevelopment potentials obtained from Phases I and II will be utilized to develop strategies to bring about the redevelopment of these areas. This strategy will ad- dress how the redevelopment may be initiated, public and private responsibilities and timing. e Task 3.5: Capital Improvements Program In many respects the Capi tal Improvements Program is a major outgrowth of the comprehensive planning process. City govern- ment's role is strongly identified with the provision of capital improvements; street~, ~ wa ter and se\ver improvemen ts , drainage projects, parks, community facilities, government buildings and offices, are all evidence of local government at work. The CIP is a natural by-product of long-range planning and the projects identified in the CIP should relate directly to the findings of tllat process. The CIP \vill include (a) a set of specific im- provements, (b) a priority system for analyzing the relationship of these improvements, (c) projected costs, (d) identification of potential resources and (e) analysis of fiscal capabilities of the City. The timing of the projects must be weighed against available resources and priorities to establish final recommen- dations for future action. - Task 3.6: Community Involvement The community participation in the planning process mentation strategies is more difficult to specify. for impl~- This is due -14- to the changes which take place in the community as the plans are prepared. The Consultants will prepare information on the implementation strategies which can be util ized to inform the citizenry, but the exact nature of public involvement should be In addition, designed at the time of the strategy development. the design of invol vement mech·anisms requires the Consul tants to be rnore familiar wi th the Ci ty and residents. The success of the implementation strategies is partially dependent on the effectiveness of citizen involvement. PROJECT MANHOUR ALLOCATION ~. " Phase I: Community Analysis Task 1.1 Task 1.2 Task 1.3 Task 1.4 Task 1.5 Task 1.6 Task 1.7 Task 1.8 Task 1.9 Leaders Review p & Z \Alorkshop Development Analysis population and Economic Analysis Physical Features Land Use Housing Analysis Transpo-rta t ion Community Workshops Phase II: Comprehensive Plan Task 2.1 Task 2.2 Task 2.3 Task 2.4 Task 2.5 IJand Use Plan Housing Plan Transportation Economic Development Plan Community Involvement Phase III: Implementation Plans Task 3.1 Task 3..2 Task 3.3 Task 3.4 T a ;:3 k 3. 5 r-r a s 1\_ 3. 6 TOT AIJ De'le lopfnen t Con t T()ls HOllS i ng St ra tegy Economic Development Strategy Redevelopment Strategy Célpi tEll Irrlpl~O\lernen ts Program Community Involvement -15- 450 16 40 44 40 ~!:O 130 60 40 40 250 80 40 40 30 60 200 80 20 20 20 Ll0 20 900 e e e PROJECT BUDGET Professional Services: 900 hours @ 37.50 Direct Expenses: Logistics, Printing, Etc. Final Report Printing, Graphics, etc ..p' Total Professional Fee Comprehensive Plan Products Workshop Notebooks Preliminary/Working Papers Neighborhood Land Use Plans Comprehensive Land Use Plan Draft Ordinance Revisions Long-Range Capital Improvements Program Citizen Participation Program Citizen Summary Plans -16- 33,750.00 1,500.00 1,750.00 37,250.00 ~ CITY OF NO~TH hICHLAND HILL~ cü¡~l.PttEI1EN~IVE PLi\N- - WOIlK SCfiEDULE - WEEr~ # 'T ASI(t) rvl 0 N . 2 F1EB. TUE~S . VIED. 4 TIIU1i. 5 F'1{ I . 6 1 .-~ v ¿ 1.1 CJ}~ i - ,1':3 <J) '........r4 '"'d þ> cd'(l) Cù t~ .-:1.:;- 1.3 i* i; (OJ' ·r-U C11l >i .-11 ' cdi : i - ~I} , ~ 8 10 11 12 13 cc ::> 16 17 18 19 20 5 p ~l··'···'. p.i; o· r-I . G :>1·'.·.·,. (1)- Ç\¡ ~ L -..I..- Ï) 1'.) 24 25- 26 27 '-.Jv CC P&Z 2 _ · ,t,iAR · r) 4 5 6 ..) /' Lf b 9 10 11 12 13 CC 16 17 18 19 2º-J c1.2 ,-4* cd¡ . ·r, ~ Pot utO ----;-,- -,.--- ~~-g 4-;\~ o:.~ ìQ þ~ 'µ' ---.....t t.) (. u 24 25 26 27 1.4 2[] ~* CC 1 ~ 5 ..------~CJ) 30 I;.'· .~ t~ 1~ .µ~~ ~ '. cQ. 1 6·' Cf}, ~Ictl · (1)t ;}¡~ * H i ~~ ! ~i o( J : .¡..J ¡ p..¡ L. f ctl!' ... -ll~'----'-'!:-----~\ --------- '-='13 J ----- ~D----- 15 j l~J , ' r--I\ LC ì, ~\ 5\ I l ::J ¡ .r! ; l L--- I.. _____------L---------l-------.J-- -------- __J_--------L--------- P&.Z 9 31 1 APRIL 2 ~ 1 () 6 7 8 9 10 1;.7"---- _ i P~1. Z * ~tar-t Co 11"L i n ue - 0tOP CC City council Mee~ing PZ J?lanrlin6 èlrld ¿o11irlg Lwleeting e WEEK # TA~K~ 1~ 1.6 '.~ ) , 14 'f 1 -~ 1 ;1 15' 1.7 * 16 1.8 -* ·'i 18 2.1 * '\"fl f; IS h L l) 0\ ~ I! Ij . JJ I.. : 1 21 --n ,1 ¡; ~ L · m· h .....:í J . L P--t1 çj ~ j --Cd ~ 22 r-fH <j p, t~ ~1 I ~fl ~1 +---..-t------; +-11- 1,¿3 rcj; H : ~: , 0, ~ t ~ çt.' ~ ri; l ~ì ¡ .r ro t --- --.,------H--+----- '/4: H: I ~ - ¡ . ! . L------k- .. , * ~tar't. C011tinue - Stop l l J °1: ~ o. :51 - WORK ~CHEDULE - 1 (1 . V * tvlOI~ . 'rUES. \YED. rr HUrl . FhI. 27 28 29 JO 1 ¡\lJ\Y CC 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 CC 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 P&Z JUNE 2 3 4 5 8 10 11 12 cc 15 16 17 18 19 ') n 2~ 24 25 26 LJL. cc P&Z 29 30 3 - f¿j ~ To ---J---- _ J-----___J____ __ __ ______~ 6 7 CC Ci ty ()Junc j I. ¡.l(~(::tirlg PZ Plannirlg arid Zoning l\leeting - WORK SCHEDULE - 26 TASKS 2,. 4 . ~ 2.5 JII * -;\ ¡~ ÌL.! pj .. ¡J II ¡ ad ~I~.¡ í .-'111 ~ j tL! ~H '1\11,. ! ~¡, \,!,; ----~-. ---cD-: þ". 2 7 ctl I : 6....1' : .-'I .1 r-ll : 1 ¡p 0 ; p...¡ 11.~ .~, I~ a I ¡,1. _~,i ~lt HI! 28 ~II glll,- ç::!l þ:.1i sP cO!1 11 ~t' .....1n S¡~ -~ -sit 29 I ~ on Iii U.!! lq ¡~ ..11- r~10Ì'¡ . 201 .. T,DES . 21 --l.-.-------- - WED. THUR. FRI. 221 --- 23 :J~ P&Z -----_.----+--- - ---------- --- \V r~r~K # 25 2.0 1 .~ j . l' 27 28 CC ]j"AUG. 4 2~- 30 31 5 6 10 CC 17 18 .~.. .... - --12 1-' 13 14 P&Z m- 2~'- 21 30--3.1 ---- 3.4 11 ~I~,¡. 1 <u¡ ~--_.~~-----------~+~ - 31 Ii cd~ '- I J H i; 11 oW!~ 1: Cf)ll IJ oW i p ! 32---'--rr-- S J '.; 3 . 2 ~'ì 1.1. "*. ~ 11 !; t1 (l)'~ -~--~H~ 3 3 r-f t.·~I' ~ qu,,' O~j: J'cù ~..dl ' ()tiH __B1Lt-t. ·gl~ 34 uq . ~ ¡J ¡~ eJ'r' 81 3\1 ö çj¡~ .µ 'J::Y t <lJ¡1 CTj '\ I 3 -S-' g;r--th-------~jlt- ~ -t-- 2QT- _~ºT---.--QOCT. -~ r-iq t .\..J:CJ-! (l) ',! hC' .~ : S ~> ~: ~ \ ~ : C) Q)' ; -ïÌ t ::J t Þ t':) , (j) ! S ~r-¡ ~~G--~l--]t-------~---,---=~~J--·~- =-f¿]~----' -=-7J----- =ªS- ..- -~~fJJ------ _____ _.___ ._ .'._ __---------....... ..._ _~ .____. . ___11_-1---.-....:..-- ____._._ .-..- .-.-- - .--.-- ..- --.~- ..______.__.__.1_._-. -.- .-" ---' 24 25 - 2Qr--- -27r P&Z 28 cc 31 III (~17p--""-;- -rr-. u LJ 1. .:..J - - rr- -=-'1.J-- 8 '_ 9 r-'--- -io 11 15 Ie) 18 -,- -_.. ... 21 2]1 23 24=r- 25 * Start I Co n t. in ue - Stoµ c~c City COllllCil lvleeting PZPlanni ng a. nc.l Zoning ~wleet ing e WEEK # 37 3.5 T ASl(S 3.6 38 - Wüt{K ~CtiEDULE - lylO.N . TUES. \'v£ [) . THUR. :FH.I. 12 1:3 14 15 16 CC P&Z 19 20 21 22 23 39 2f3 27 28 29 30 CC P&Z 40 2 NOV'. r~ 4 5 6 0 -.----------.-.---..------- ---_._.~------_._-~- ---~_.~ I . L------ ------------- .,>. ' =r =r-' -----¡-- -t-- __--1 _--I -r------ --=----J.-.---. -~=--T---- ,-' ----_. ------.-- __.~ ---J ____..__..____ ---.,-..-----..--.L---.- --- ----.--- _.__._~_.------ * '~Jt aI' t Con tin lie - ~tolj l~C l~i t Y Co Ll tiC i 1 ¡vlee t ~i ng ~PZ Planning arid Zon1n6 t!',leeting ·e ... ~~ ;.. .., e O.L\TE: 1-8-81 \l1- SUGJECT: Citv Planner Position DEP AR-rrIENT: Ci ty f-1anager B/\C KGROUNO: ~unci 1 man Brad\[ and Counci 1 man Uood and CitIL f1anaqer ¡'Ji 11 i ams visited tvJO cities of Terrell and t'Jarshall. It was -discussed at the City- of Marshall that the best approach to take toward the Comprehensive Planning is to have a staff memöer work full time with the professional planning service. l-Je all felt very str~ngly for this need and therefore recommend approval for this position. The funds for her salary will be available from the salary allocated to the public \lJorks director. I intend to leave the public works director's position vacant for the next t~ to three months. When the Pl'} pos it i on is.. fflJezf some funds may be neces sa ry from the Genera 1 Fund Surplus to cover both positions for the remainder of the fiscal year. Both positions will be funded next fiscal year. ------.---- ---------------------------.-----.- CITY CaUi'JCIL ACTION REQUIRED: _~rov:e or Deny BUDGETED ITEN: YES----.UL8· r:o_ J1.CCowrï NW'18ER: 60-0- 11 01 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - -- -- - - -. - - - - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the below named department head is appointed by the 'City r~anager; and, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that the below named appoi ntment by the City ~1anager is confi rmed by the City Council: Karen Phillips Director of City Planning Passed and approved this 12th.jay of January, 1981. ....~ ' Dick Faram, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, City Attorney O,l\TE: 1-8-81 1-0 e SUBJECT: 1981 Board of Equalization DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Tax Assessor/Collector See attached letter from Mrs. Ann Cannon Tax Assessor/Collector ~ ~ - CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: ~prove reappointment BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/ A NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e City of ~rth Richland Hills, Texas FROM: DICK FARAM, MAYOR ANN CANNON, ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR DATE: JANUARY 5, 1981 REF: TOM-QOOl-81 TO: SUBJECT: 1981 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ~. " I have contacted Mr. Charles Owen and Mr. Cliff Griffith and they have accepted the appointment to serve on the 1981 Board of Equalization. Mr. Len Van Essen has declined so therefore we need a new member to serve in his place. cflrJ ~M~~~ (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 .I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 or-\T E : 1-8-81 ----------- Resignation of Bob Brady ~I SUBJECT: e --.--- ------------- DEP A,F(rnEtIT: -----..--------- ----------. Ci t,y jjanager -------- Bi\CKGROUND: r1r. Bob Brady submitted his resignation to be effective Jan. 5, 1981. Council is required t~.vote to accept his resignation and declare place six vacant. The call· for an election \':ill be made at a later time. ;~~'- .. ~~.... .~ ,1) e ------------------------------- ---------------------.------- CITY COUNCIL F,CTION RFQlllo~P. I \- ;.,,) &\_,'..J. Accept resignation BUDGETED ITEf'l: YES r-J/A, NO fl.C C OllJ'/T NUi'!3 ER: r ¡¡ /\ - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - ... - - -- - -.. - - - - - - - - .- - - -.... ... ... - - - ... - ... _. ... - - - - - - - - ... - - ... ... - - - ... ... - - ... - - . e /J " I~¿t!/ / - ..-s-- g / A' .14'/1AA ð.. J!f ¿;; /7, /// I , ~~ City of ~~rth Richland Hills, TexaslßL , , ~." , : \,./:' - -. - ~ -- - '-.~'-:-"-- -..::::-:.:;-..... }\rJ; Honorable Mayor Dick Faram 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas ( f)\ìqYl \ "-~- I t J I I I I I I 76118 Dear Dick: I hereby tender my resignation as Councilman Place Six, effective this date. I feel n~ resignation is necessary due to pers~ñal and business reasons. Respectfully submitted, \ ".~ Þ ~ - . .. ..' .....~.. \.) - \ \ .-.- ~ "- / ..:..;<: \ " - . ~~ . . p~Q,e;tc; .'Br~JL¡y- . / Â0uncilman Pl\lce Six ,../' \ \ . <~ .....-..-'" ... jm (317) 281-0041n301 N.E. LOOP 820/P,O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TX 76113 I I ! ! i I I I ¡ I ¡ ." ~ ~'" ~-,.. e e e ~'$.'''~ MADISON PUBLIC ltBH^HY MUNICIPAL VIDrO SERVIC[ ......~ --.......-..----.-........,.~..........._. o~. t .9~~___J_, ,_~C).8.q. THE fUNCTION OF THE MUNICIPAL ACCESS CHANNEL: C¡tiC~ble 12 ....~~..- _._. .. -_.. .., .....- ..........- ~.....................-.... The Municip.d Video Service is. the ofJer'llinq ilqency of (¡tiCabl(: 12, '"Jhic.h h the City of Madison's designated Inunicip,¡ ¡¡CC(~S5o cilbll~ ,televhio/1 channel. This ulJllct, proylded for by Cily ordinancc, and opcrilted sinc~ 1975 by MVS and its predecessor, the Cable Telcvi~ion Office, hits 5oen/('d Mad i 50 0 n res ide 1\ I ~. ;'; ~ J i t h p r Q 9 r iI mm i n 9 des i 9 n cd to c n: it t c r lJ b lie 11 n d c r !>I <HI ¡ i n ~ u f and pa r tic i I" 1\ ¡,HI i n C i t Y gOY f.: r nine n t ac t i v i t j c ~, p roy r ,liTIS, illH.J ~ C r v I C I: S , Pr09ral1¥llln~J un CitiCable 12 ranges from gavel~lo-9avcl COYfH.lgc I- ( gove r nmen tHiel' t i ng 50, to doc urn en t éJ r ¡ e 50 on ma 50 50 t r.HI~. I t .1nd \Ie te rans I " C ,.... ice $, it n d i III. I t J · C 50 50 U c h pro 9 r it inS é1 S c I (! C t ion C 0 v t: r d 9 (: , I I b r û r y 50 tor y _ l,uok hou r ~ for I of'.... j n9 i mpa j red ch i I d ren, prog rams On emp I oymen t, hea 1 t h C iJ r e. and p lJ b I i ( ~..) f e t y · A \I a r i c:: t y ° f pro 9 ram for roo') 1 ':0 arc pre s en t cd 0 n t he c h ann e I, i n c I, J J i n 9 "I ve" ij n d t a pc d Coyer a 9 e of P IJ b I I c: proceed i n 9 s ,..Ik JHograOlI>, live c.all~lns, documentaries, InstructiolMI fllm5 and video' "'I(.'!.. C(>n(I'rl"'If t.... <1nd "bulletin tm\rc," "rI,He.d Inrllfllli't JUII. III "ddlllon, ,... V :.. I H C' H' II lit, JI "" ,111.11 j "'.J 1 II a t I. c. u I t u r a II c d IJ (; II t j /I II," II 11/1 t u r (f , IIi'" t h: II I <I r I y '. j lilt: IJtU:~JId "IJ 01" .11.ltJIIC.Y of tho M.1( I ~Oll Pllb II c.: l j h, oilY. In operi'1t jnlJ C it ¡Çable 12, the Hunlcip)1 Vld(~o St~r"ic.t: maintains the following objectives: "U - to provide inform.1tional progrüms which addre:>5 CLJrrent, Ci ty cnnccrn~ - to make IHlblic proceedings generally more accl~~5oible to all Madhun res ide n t ~, - top r (. vi, ,., I' r 09 r a nvn i n 9 t hat c () ve r 50 sub j c c t <,; w II i c h cone ern s i 9 n i f j C it n t I y underscf';cd ~¡f~gment~ ~f the popu1 at ion - to address ~1bjects which are normallynot cov('r<..d adequately or at q II by (I t I t.~ r tel t.> C ommu n j c oJ t ions f adl i t i (> S to al low lit ¡lens (p respond to, i)nd pan icip<ilc in, discUSf.lon of govt!rnnat-otd 1 issues top r 0 v j de r c ere a t i ° r.a I, cui t u r ai, and e due a l i 0 fh) I pro 9 r ù OIm i n 9 a nd s e r v jet: S ',J i I I ìÌ nth e sam e 9 u ide I i n c s a sot her lib,. .) r y s e r vie e s .~ cab 1 e TV f. U b foe ,. j be r S. ( \v hie h C lJ r r c n t I y i n c 1 u d (~5 .1 II 0 uti / 3 0 f Ma d i son I s population), and non-subscribers. through community viewing centers ,-'I" #." #/1/ /' i ;ft. C UHf< t. N l PRO G R ^ t·tH , tJ (. "if" _..__.._... __.__ ... _..,........ .. .. _. A.' ,.,,/1 0 u ri n ~ I 9 & () - 8 I. C j tie " b I c I 2 I '" " II n! n, . III d \.. i I I I.." .7" f u I I Ovl i 1\9 ¡.> r09 r LlII~1I ¡ IIg : ~ ¡~:... 2 .. . -, t: ,. f j I (' C d f, t I I. (J I tit: Pub 1 i C Me e tin q!; : (gJVCI-lo-gavcl) Ha d i SOn (oll~aon (aune i' - prod uccd i n coop." r 01 t I (II) ~"I i I h ((llIlp II: Ie ct... II/IC I TV; pro ¡j~ ~~( i u '0-1; -ë()m p , C lee h ,1 n /I C' TV. c , II, ... .. '. I c x c I u... i v l: I), (¡J(' I' C i I j C ,"..II c' I 2; i n c It,d ~ S M V S pro d 'j c t i an 0 ( w (: C k I y " (J I' II d . i I ('III I j Cd i ¡ ~ I <.; , III d , I' HI l II I y presl.'nt'Hion by interpreter for lh(: 11I:.I1'il1" ¡1"I'dill'l!; I¡VI:, ;'l1d t"pl~ replay; weekly - Dan ceo U 1\ I Y B d a ,. d I) f Slip C I' V is I) r s - r I () d II U ' " ¡ 1\ ( ( I: ) p (: ,. ;11, i () /I VI i t II ( ( ) I I' I G I C ëhã nn e , - I '1-; "i¡-':-CJd~"c-t i on -by' 'ë~;iip-I(; lee ho1 litH: I ¡ V , (." I d r: C;I~, I e';( ( I 11'. j '/ (: I Y (lye r C¡t¡Cable 12; live; bi-wcckly Mildi Son !J¡¡;,¡ ,I ùf EJuC')l ion - prodll(:(!d ill \.1)1)1)("01' ion wi III CCllllplt'tc Chdunu1 T"\ï;Produ'.1 j (),;"-bÿCornp fë"të Ch"oll()' lV. r,'.1t II'C,'~.I I:XC Ill!. j vt1 'y (I'll:" C j l j C,..b I ( I 2; I ¡\It."; b ¡ - \.JL! C k 1 y - M.t d j ~ I) n f' I ~ t. I ic: He ill the 0111/11 i ~ s ion - to.. I}' I~ J1 I.. y; 1110/1 t h 1 y -..-.......~.... -...-..... ---.-.......~~-..-,.............................- ....,............ Pub lie tk 1( j 'Ill S - s po n S 0 r e Q h y C i t Y d I · p,¡ III II ' " Is. d ¡vi s i () 1\ S. C( )/lUll i ~'. r. j lJ n \.i ~bòã' ( , ~.,h:¡;ld by 0,1 nc COu n lyRe ~¡I Ol\ill I' I 01 /III i ( IJ CO/llI1l i !t 1. j CJI I; I j V f:. illlLl tap ere p t d Y; 0 n r (,' 4 u est by d (. pt. '... ,. ... ~I I.' "t y e .. Un.. HJ c ., I·.r í "' i', I 0 ~ " . ~ ,~, I!~ .t!~! _ 0,1\. ' ,!,! ~,!~ ~ r I nl I.· 1'1 (, t " ,.. I Iq' to II I I y f : II q II, I ' I J II d "i'.q /I' I,: I" .1 y; lOt 0 '2 1111 'I) I I n ~ I ~ &: iH' It (II I ( .I) !' r . II II V I ' 1111 II! r , J \J" , , - B (OoJ cJ b.w II 'r 1:1 c c. ()IIIIõ;U n i C ê) I i on... HI! <ilj I " ti.)" Y III Id I d - c.... h 1 t~ TV C',CIIOIII i ... ~ i O(1j 1 I Vt;! : ....- --,.- ... - ., -'. . ., '- ....... '.. ... ..--_...~~.¥...- --.- ... . ........ rr·..:'Ul t h 1 y ~. f r".:~ I (.)',.tnen t In f {) [" :1:~1 t ion .- ....~.~-......,..... ...- ..... ..- ...... .........,.....-.. -- .. . . - ..-'~.i.!'. t. - .. \I" r en t Ii!> t i ng S "rld (h.' 5 C r i II i Oil', \I f c: i t Y () f Hild i SI)/1, {),)lIí: ('QUO I Y , ..11 d 5 t .ìt " 'J \.¡ i .. c () n 5 i ) P II b lie t' /II II ) CI Y 1111' III " I ' po" II II ¡Ii ,' ~" P rt: r. f :.. ( I' d .)' r. j t Y , C u " n l y, d I \ J S I ,) ll' per Son n ll1 d i v j !> i l) n 'i; d I .. of rip ( i (III '. " 1\ d Ii" I i '¡( I '¡ 'I f j II b '.i .) \I .:!Í L) IJ 1., ¡lib (J t II pub lie ,1 n d IH' i v iH (: ~. I' ( I " ,. '. ! III f'l II h \.I i '. c: I) 1\', i.. J ( , I I; I' ,. vie c: ; t ,) ;)~ r it ~ . t 'j Y ~ d ,1 ¡ 1 ï, \" i l h ~J~l'r I y u pd':J t &. ',a -~ _i_~.¥.:_C '" /I :! ¡ "'11,'.0 Y~:.!..c:..0_~QpJ~o ,. t _l!!~" i .l!.:.:: . "! 1l" ,:' t i /1 h:¡, 1 r d " Ii', I ¡,( I '. ( ( ( lJ r r en t J y .J v.) I 1 ,) L ¡ " I I!, ¡, I 0 y 11\ 1..0 n lop P ),. tun i t i I' s; I' . H: /¡ \'1/'" , f' 1\ d ~'y~~U ~_~.' ~~I..?_r.!I\,1 t j., r I .f I?Lo_~~t.L~~_U _~.i.l_ i.l:":'. - ~ -~ - S_t~) :) , ~ - "i V h I j 9 h t s C. lll' I't: II I .1 n d II pen ¡: Ii " fJ ' ~ v, ' 1\ t " " It/¡ : M, 1 d i '. 1111 c;... j e ( q1 t\,.· r .... í t h n;J" r é1 t i ve !o . i nIl.! r·" i c I'¡ ~, ù n II I "I I H: .\ I II f i 11/1 ... ,1111 P I i ( I) ~ ,¡ f I' ù f _ f u ,. ';¡:II\C I: ',; 1.1 P I.' r 1..' pI.. y; n n CI 1 II I Y , ~ t~ V f' r.. I I, ï d .. ')", e - ~ ,.~; t~ll..~ nt" "f Cí _1)'_ _? 5= ~P{" (~I..'I..' hid 0\,,) ,,~;Jr;T .~ ~<.. ,i¡l~ , "",I' ,. " ........-----...-----.-.--............. ._~ -.....---.....-......---..- ~. -- "" . . ;' I" ;I " 3 ~: ' «,i II u I let i n BO:I I' d i , If () r 11¡,'\l ; 0 n f,. 11111 1110 ~ l d (' pol 1 I""", I~, 1111 pu IJ lie I. '.1/' i 'I <¡!, ï Tþ'rä -':-ý.' p r c; ':1 f .j-m S .) rH ~ c r vie c s, II e d 1 I II c Ii" i ( ". I.. I '. , () II I /:~. ¡ H J L I i l. :,1 ' I 'I i" ~I <, . fi.:¡rks aod rccre.)tioo. Civic (elltl~r I've """ t.j, i' I., If·"i'.I'''1 i()II, "'dcI' r c 9 i s t r ù t i 0 ". ¡. Ide r II.; J n i c II II' C' t i I I U ~ in!" (' j I d i '. t r i, I',. f: I ( ,; II II d i ( , I r. II I ','" j I t (' tI on (j lie it b I ell d u r i 11 9 ~-~~.L~ c _ t .!! \_ .B ~ ::!.r~. pt:' i II 11 " j. , \ .' If HI. () f I 11/' I,.J j ''¡ ,,/I'. j II [ due a l ion a I It.-J ¡ON C l wo r k; aut 0 m ,J! (~d d ,1 ¡I)' !.. : r v I (, C I ~'c r ion Co v era () e .~ -~_. -_.._........-...............................~..,A...~ 1 i vc çov c r ':.11) e () f l he C i l Y () f 1'\'IlI i !>O 1\ (d I' ( I , II /I ,,( I'... 'I/) r d II rI r (¡II III. HI (()l lie ¡ I. j n C Iud i 1\ 9 i 1\ I c I' V i t' w!). f (';Jt u r ('!>. i\ 1\ d 1 J I" l n t I II . II: i III J I I' 1.11 I i (' " (\ f r ' I. I J " r. : b j c n n j oJ 1 p r i /:.. J( '). ij I d ~ e 1\ c r.) I (' I {' C 1 i U 1\ '" 1 j \I ', 01 I I d I of !/ ' ,. <' 11 .. y ~. ,II f' '.. ~ I'll \ : /" ''¡ ( u ':'.& '_~_¡J ~~c___~~_i_~1.~.~ ,'. t r \' e n l S / f, c t ; v ¡ t i ('~) ( (' x ,) 111 P ) t' ~. ) _......... _...~ a., ......._.,..... ...._-..........._._. .._~ - ~ - ~?_~_<:..C_~:) ( S! l)( )' _1_~~LI_~L~; l ;¡ pC / l' P I ;1 y; ,,¡ II \I ¡,, U fI U sua I H ü p r .. : í i 1\ ~l :~_ ~). \.100 11 - f f 0 In t-I P l ~; " \;, 1 '" II.. y 0 f f I h r: S q IJ .: I rt: I. 'd: /I «;~, ; (~P~~P-G' ì~ - M i ~ t t:r k 0 ~.~ I 'I .. I !l~_i I l~.!._~~e~;!jl '1 !:. ~l ~l ~_ ( . I "" í ' W. (.. I It' I I j (' I fill J« 1\'/1' d I) Y ,:¡-r; é;o L.. tal k t. i r It C' M I' L Chi I II r (~n I s l j h ' iI Ii.. /I . [ .. I' . r f' p I oj 'I ,; , ~ L~:; .4I.i) (~ it), ~~~.~fJ_i.!..>~_: e . "'~\CS ¡/Id (CJ/nll)Unily EduclIl ic," (',I:I i,·'. ,III/.! inctividll,d r.n~JI""") , ............. .... .....~......,.......A..... ..................~_ .... ..........".~'t4ll--....-.....-_.... f':d.'t'.~,I.¡P!' ~.. / r I)':, [' \'..l·''t~)!I.H '.:' R.r~,p"I\.".Ild i ''Y (1'1/')) , I .; "II \ 1/ IÎ t r I ,. '" t I j ,I n HI v II ( ¡ II ..' ~ , / II I I . I" II : 0/ ' It 1 ,, '.',.. . f' u I ¡ c f' .. " ú . t .¡ ¡ " ; :. t f .. t ¡ n n ; ¡""""', dit" "·"1 i'ilt t,,"w.:&tU (),. (j l Y I, d', t. , .( , I d t j..1t . (10 . ;.;" t II..· "l \J t " · ,¡;\ j r. / f H ,d t" II ,. \I V I . !II II II j ,,~ · Iii,,, II',', I nil', (,) f V'II' i ( II '. II I' ," t It- (; 0" M (<<:f(I!>, ¡'In&J 11<,," ! 0 lot'! .) Hond con!'wlc:r Dr hl',II!" C ,.. t' !l'1(Jí~i ,1I.,tl. ~.erìi i u:r.; ( ~ p~r to: f) 1.:. ì'~.. ; !Ii' , 'I , ,. !:. \' \J /:IC " t 50 0 f C i I Y _ ~~ ~,A '~e r i c $.: p r ~ !> ~ I) till 9 I'll i n \ !.' I d ,. V i (I IN () f t.t d hi J/1 C. j I i l\~n:¡' and C i 'y ùgcnc; ì ~~; puh I j c it y of C ¡ t y .old I Cnlll1t y. pr()~Jf dill'" ijf'l ¡ V, l j."S '-111 d ~. V I:" t S; oJ II ¡ 1 II P po r t U 0 it i c s r () /' M,) d i :-; U II ", /11 d«· , I' I.' I ~ Q f1 !i lor I: I' 0 rt /« " 01 fI d (,(.>:\ V ~ r ~ c w i \ t I, I II c j reo n !> tit u (' II t ~I . TI II' I' )' ¡I ,1111 r "I'> i .,!. (of t II r I: I: ~. 'I"~: JI t !J ; II C II; ;ò¡a,1 nit y l í ,J L"J lJ(~ ". "D ì s t r j c. tHe PI.) r t !. ", I " If If t r I !. i IJ II t 0 III I I ; I " I ,,' I.' I .) ,'V¡ \.. t' I ~ k 1 )' . , _C.i. ~ Y~_~~~_t [k \ c I~~p~~t'.!..'~. !!,.I?~.I~ ~ _~. A s c~, i I", ( 'I t I ¡IIi /I!t 111'\" c: i l i ; ,: 0', r d II h ,) v C j n put i, ¡[ ;, "1 I) W l h c j r t .t ~ d n II ,H S i 1 r I~ !:> I)' n I, P r I> d IJ c: ~ cI j II 1 f) I ~, I" II :. [ ; 1'1 LJ ~ c ,. lJ I .. " , CI t> 1 I.' C ') S ~ b e f () r «: bud ! : I r t' v i , ~ v ; r. I J\' r e I I ..., y.. . I!. t!¡¡:IU.:i ¡'r&: ,I 1 r., f f j C Rt:d i ,.~c I i on ..S~~Y(h: - I'llb I i ¡ i,. f(¡l/lld t I (HI f,/:1iI i n;1 r ; i ~'p ~ . - f t" f) f .~~ -y . . ~ i .~. ~P.c,r.~.,!!H'" I . T riJr~.j '~2.: IJfl' 0"/1.11 [·",'n! 1'''1'''1.'11\ ~ I)o~r,),w, lr(ldtJC "1/ oI'l\! OIe'!lI; 1 ed IJY 111'fj ('il' ¡ I -.1 ; n in!; c,: i r t.: ( i ~ ì Ii It' r !.; I iq W ,. I.' II! iI Y ~; r ¡¡I' '. ( .t t ¡ () n!> "r C i I I I U i I 1111 . ( I I: ¡J I u ~:. I !. I .: ¡', " 1, I... \' ceo I () r ¡ V ,. . ' C c' i v I' r '..; I, , I ) . ¡" II L I Y ~ . ý'~ e . ,/ r "...'" !~ct iOII.Of fj~.i_'~~..!.!\)i!!...~~._ C í ly c: II.~I ~ I. ')1' i ((. ""':"(:/ll " .. Pf(IIJf"h' for trdi'1il'1 of clt!ction offici.lls, .¡ "P.,·I,.,",I",,. r:o(r'.I~": l"pI' r(~pl.IY, ~ro~ram~ fur ~jJ_eE_i ,II¿~~ i ~~_ - Conu1)o.)n (uunc ¡I lot crprc l.\ l io!,,--0.!_~~:.:).!_i !',"- ,II'~!':I i .f~"(! ~ Mon III I y qùv~~ 1- tr:rqave I i nt~rpr-l:t·ã-tTòñ of City Counc i I ~h'l~ t i /I~I';: I ¡"" "fir! 1011)1.' fl:p I,IY; IIII"I! 1.1 y. · Job I i n e .J n J ~ i t y - C 0 ~ n t y .f rJ;j ~ 1~t?,1!~~ ~_-9PJ ) ~ I !.' I If I j _ t I (", . ~. <)/111 ~ I i III j II: d 'j poi II ¡'ill translation is provided currently; /"\0 ~ t 0 f l he $ to! pro U rams arc p r (I d \Ie I~ d b y I 111·.t ,II t ,. f t. III: 11\111 ir- i p." V i d ( : q S e r v ice. Iv hie h cur r e n t I y em p I 0 Y $ t h r I: ~ f u I I - l i ' \" C i v í IS,' I V i t.:« , I · III pi vi .. I , '; , III d fill f: II.) r t - t ¡me wo r " - ::. t ( J '( S t u den t ~ · A I I per ~ 0 n ,.. l' I, i: I ì c! í /I q I I, ~ : fin. !, I , I' /I C I.H r dill d l (f' , IJ.)r{icip.)te in thl' production of Citi-Cilhl(~ 17 "fll'l/dlll/ni",!. ^ppro;,jlll.I!I''/ 12() húur~ per 010 nth 0 f " : , "II .. .1lI l Ollie) t ~ d It, ( v ide 0 tit pc d ,111 d I í 'I t ' ) I" II' I' . If I MIl i I t ¡ ~ C , II J I (: (. , I '. l () V H f the C It d n n e I, Ú \'J!' j (. h .1 P pro x i ma lei y 3 0 l 0 6 0 II ( "" ., 1" . I "1<1 II 1 h. d ~ p . "d j "'J ' II I tI H~ t ¡me 0 f y c:':¡ r , I·J u" i 9 i "a I mil t c r i ,) I no t pre v i 1\ I '. I 'I ' , j , I" I. / '. I r here ðt;e mCiWS by \vh i ell 'VI! 1...." <1.,,/,: 1°1' .. d ¡vcr., i 1'1 lIf lIoW pro- '.1 r ,) n I S e IJ 11\ C n t S I · I' t I \I · c h.) n 11 c I \v i t h ) II l S <1 C r j f i l. i "c r III' ~,." vie.' <; u n 1-11 tÍ c h II hilI Y .:. ~ I: n C i c s ;, n J c j l i .: t: n s h ,I ',/ C « ,n Ie l 0 d (: pen d · F j r~;[, \1/ e \'/1 II II of I II 'I" · I 0 II ,J V C .1 r II: r 111.. III' II t ~¡ t u d ¡ 0 in which all 01 II..: esscntials for minimum l~fl)rl/i'd,<ìnllllll 'I:'~,)tilíly pn;duC.liun ,..au I d be a....a i 1.11. ~'. ')nJ second I y, \VI: p I ,'Ill (0 ~;t't'k IHI r pro"ro\lIl/l\; II!) lIl.)! 1,:". ill rt.:<idy I, t: c n p r u d II , ~ d L,· "t II ,: r IJ I ¡ vcr 11111 c nl.\ I .1 ~ J t' n c ¡I: ~, ' I I ( " I I · , .. r I II i 11'. t ¡ l" l ill,,'., ~.I Ii i d 1 \-1 i J I l1l: .1 p P r lJ p' i.. t c t \I r l ,"It.> Il, C ,) ~ tin fJ II n C i I j C.) b I .. I?, W í I h I 111' <¡ II if I. II f I I,,: : 111I1Í C I p ¡II .. i. t; C ~ ~ c" .11'\04,' I I " () '.I ,. ,11111\ i II ~J r u 11( t i IJ 1\ I\)( I(· t\.¡ d i·.. ,1\ 1'1 tI, i I I. i " ' , I ,. 'I h II '. \ r II 1\, ! .. J; II r ~ I .' " 11\)( \( J i III i" I I' I .",« i II I" '" ~ I' It'l' I I I lilli' 1\ I II f' r II I I I II " I I".¡" 'H i II II,¡ I I" {\I / ,1/ '/ ì' 1/ "I . A C I I .., ¡ I y I, I" í.. "r I · ,I lJ'" , d , ' " '. l" I: !i \.11 J«' ( " C j lie ,I b Il' I ï, ¡,,,,,, 1''' ,'I I" I I' 1\ . If II II I '. ,11 t h n ¡" ' " ,.)' of '. " , I' I of " t II r i, Iff) "111,11 i\l".1 I / ¡,; " I I If ' ." I" If I I d i If I, " I ' II ,. i (' 111 " . /11 . " ,. ~ ,I ~ i n \""1 i l. 'I t h l! M u n j , j p a I V i d q ) (; c ,. v ¡I" i ~, 1'.1/. r ic. \I I ~I d 'I i n ll! ,. I . '.r ,...J i CI c ~ '" p~nJ i nç¡ µrogrdlil:\; n~) ~,.~: ,Ijl . 'n t ¡Jr.1c t í Vè P "og"am!> - i 1\ \I/h kh G i li II.!/I'. (..n i 1III'r..c~ t II j rc~<:; l I Y '.,¡j l II C í [y o if i cia I:. t y tel c ph 01\ C, 0 r i 1\ l he !;[ 1/ d i " ; - P r I) '.J r Jill'> (II ,. S p~' I.: i ,1 I A u d i 1..' n to l~:' ~ i n \1/ h ÌI: II II II 1/ P , . 1111 d \ ~ r !. « ! ,. V I.' cI "ï 1.11. . 1111: d i ~ , (è.~. ~pII¡~,II-~lw.lldn~, h'!.;II'íl\g ¡1I11).tifl'd. I'h~·',ic.."ly di'"II.>I"d. tlnl/ thú. l' I d ~ r I y) ,", II' P r \' :. L' n t· l h c i r I t \l ) U ~ I II t:. ' "II I I \' I \I' I' t ,,) 11 ~" .) n dr, , c .: i . ¡ I' r: ,r I u: p r CJ _ 9rònlnin~ ~I",II'C(I ll) tI~ci r Spl'C 1,"iI nl~cd'., c ~ 1 t \, r .11/ (chJ 1;;1 t ion:1I P r UIJ r alii::, - i n \vh it" C' .". I'd fld C' d c ()v~',.;¡ 'Ie tJ f CI'I'"Il(¡j t y ¡wr (orl1l.~( '., d r [j:, (s ,)IIJ educ,) lor,; j '. III ("/ i ""d · e e , ¡ ~:'~'''~,t Y.;- :.~"":!~' i '.f ; '¡"\,...... . . , " ~ !' , , ,;. , ~ JÚ', , ,)~",:"..;~~:.' ¡, }"".fF".:· ( l , '0 r··-r!"~J CÇ~~I (j!~.'.,.,; , >' ~;:.:,~: -~- ~ T ';:.. , .... Our i n 9 I 9/3 I, I heM LJ n i ci pa I V j de () S c r vie e I d ,If I " I ( , II din u.; 11 i l!> c; I II' ,. t ~ /I l V r () CJ r ."1 II I( i I\! ..nd tv deve lop ('l~\·1 i¡dv.Jnccd progr':HI1$ j r' areas d i ~.(,II',~.I'd n..,. J i l~r. 1,./j r h .) ',lud;o .is <1 bð~C from which tù \-IOd., è) modc:ít ¡nere."I!i!.! in 1111' j i"'.1 YI"'" ¡'} 11\1: .¡nICJIHI' Ilf pr()~ gr.:lfTming (both In nel~ .:lod on-going fonl1,lls) .1n.1 .. I'ille'h hi':"11:" jncr/'.¡;;;~···r;1-l¡(: It.:vcl o f qua lit 1. 0 f pro 9 r a nvn i 0 9 I iH the tic.¡ , I Y,P" 0 ~I' . I "1/' I'¡ ( i {d I 1)1 . ì 11 d t t: C /¡ n i '. ,II 'I U JI J 1<.1 b c ~xpcctcd, . Nel'f program,> f ':,,):ö i b Ie dur i "9 1 he 1981- 19B;> .:lnd stiJff, but JI'OdUCl!d from iI ncw sludio rniC¡hl ': ( ..) . \ C } It, U t. ¡ J ; /i () CJ incl"rJe: I ! 1 , . '.J ' 1/:' I. ~ jt HJ(IC t - A weekly "Lj'le" cal h in prog'".:Itrt, loJi th C i l Y oj (j c i ,) 1..: (llqd(~('t.l i 11'1 .11101 par C iç i p'n j f\ 9 a nd i n t erg c tin y w j l II C ( 11111 U 1\ j I Y t; r () " p <; ; Co... e r "II) l' c¡f C j v j C C e n t c r <.: u 1 t lJ r.) I e v I ~ n h , Itl of II , I I r¡ , d II till j f\ II o Ctw r C , >1 : ¡, : 1 i :. $ i () 0/8 (,),) r d II} L:' I: l i n q S I !> " c h . } ~, I Ii I . ,. h Y '. ¡I. 1 I 0 i . ..,I I Ii I j t i \", COlìll11issj,)lI. ür the PIc1nl\in~ (011 Mil;:,,; inn. \.I 0 r " ~ hü I ' " "II fJ I,) \I è r "mc n t r u,. L Ill! t1l: ¡H' ¡ n c¡ j 1111' 01 ¡,,. II U 1(1 U 1111 It i L Y ; l i~rary prn'Jral;~lIing, cl ther throLlnh {HI/' 1)1/11 IH IIdl/c.:l ion Or' obI.. ¡nw' ('(JIll o t he r it q e rì ,: i l: ~ . Of çour:>e. .'1V~ h'i II Continue to dcvclop 11"';111', by ',.;hkhCltiCùble I.? Cdll c.(lI'ry prograrrvn;ng P('¡~,1I1Cl'd by Oth~r 9vv,~rltnll.:nl¡1I and 'H¡.....t.. ('IIt.lti(!!t, l"i., mi(lh/ I\cllldt: ':i,ltcll i la: pr0'.1r,'IIIH:líIl9 fn,)II. PßS, lapl!\> olnd flllll~, """I lhe U;.ll;on.d ^udirJ'Jj',II," Con tor, · 1 I1\J II r 0 q ( ,,'1111, f · /II, L it.ll'.),. i \0' S (1 nd (J I t h''' t.-, b I" p ,. n II II' , ¡I'" f. ,,: I I lit,! I , C()mb'¡ rlÍ nV r Iii ~ na:w p rog r \lOin" n~ w j t" l h.lI ,wt! j L h I/I~ (; U r t'(!n t I Y "¡.ve do ''¡c~ I npç;d , .:l n d pro v ; din 9 ;)I k q u.] t c pub I ; (; ; n ( 0 n n."It ion, ,1 IIIC,>I' . "j, ì " I Y v i ~ i Þ 1 c r Vet iii n "p I ÿ/q ..1 d , l· t.'ç r ~.1 t l~d .) Ill), ¡lHJ h loJ I:' .1 r l~ I}O l .1 I w;} Y 'í . .., iAlI; 'HI ( 0, I oj ,. ('I! 0111 IIi 1''1Ç (!!~ \.oj i l h 1.~Io4.. ' '(;Uft!; u I 0 \J r p r<J9 r .J111'.; (j. C. 11\<1 ny 4 r c ., ¡ l1I(>lj : ~ to '!>IIIó) n.. "ll! i d.. II t j fJ.1 ')Iq <¡ /'0\1 p', \-iÌ l h i ì, the <: On"11u n ¡ t 't) , I f M V S C iI n ere.) tea mo r II! d i v I~ r s l~; I n I ~ r .11: t ¡v,! I" n 11 r ,) rom i n 9 ~ c he d u I t: ( j) C i t ¡' C é) Þ I I: I 2. we: w j 1\ h.:¡ '¡ " l; r .:; It ~ d j) h i U h ~ r "~ ... c I n f <.: 011"11 II Ii I 'I IJ, i I ¡I.. It io II . In .1¡.Jq i t i "", ~tVS pi aos to COOL i nuc:: to t'x,'''IIHI ¡ h ,¡ç l i 'I i ti cs in... i dC()l~p<:'{ ¡. µ r ù d u <; l j Q n for (It, v l' r n mc n t a I ' a 9 e n ç i L.: S f \.H st c1 r r rr .) i /1 ¡'I If, l ~I r.. 11 .I( In r c q (.' '. I ~(' d o n a c 4,) s t r c.: c U '.' c.. r)' b d ~ is. r i n.1 1\ y, ! tit' I lu n i c i p..'l I V j d ~~ l) 5 c: .. v i ç I~ i ~ !. cd i 1\ ,) pt . 'i '> i I ¡j I j f. j (; !i f IJ r q r ,H \ t 'II l 0 de vel Q p pro '..F .) j /I son I 0": a leu I t lH I! ., n d h j q () r Y d III /) t "e f' ;¡ r c c1 '.ì Q fen ml' iU" i ~ Y ..) loJ,) r e n t! !t 51 OJ n d I j Il i; r ~ H , We h.:t y c d j '> c u sse d, f C) r . · x .I r : I) I (~, t h I~ P()~!> í b i I i l 'I (¡ f mèmb~ r S 0 f the Ih:.J' i n9 i nip a i r t.d c()mnlln j t y p rodtl C j /11) I Iw i r 0\'11\ pro~1 r <UtIS , A !atl.ldio ,)I\d workable mcctin~h'll)rkin9 arl~&J 1'/lIuld be inv.:tluabIH for thi!. p \ r po :; e · If:; II o! It !J r oJ n t s arc r c c c i v cd, M V S l'/n u I d b I ' t ' n.1 b I e II t () i" c r I.' ,', <; l! i l', sl~{f size: and ellploy t~nlpOr4Jry Sl..rr for ~peciric: PI'jlJ'l~,/cvcnl$ 1'lÍth(AJl imp.)criog·on it" ¡:'\nícipal SUpporl. J S/ t f Dr iI f led by: ^ I, dr. '\'1 B 1'1; c. h f! r . I' ,. ( Itl' dill C I)f) ,. d ; n d ( () ,. '. I 0"'[011('" I. 1980 . /';_-'>A _ I / , - w .., œ o >- CD >- ~ C E & :) en w u .... ~ Q: tAl CI) . Lt.I ac :::» ... ..... Q Z W Q., )C W z c .... en ~ ,.. ...., .... , L\I ... · C · LiJ · to- t Q. '0 Ie · c · · · · · · Q IW C oz GO&.tJ ð\r ...2: o · U IW · a: · · · · Q ....... · f- I V) liAJ · ::;) · CJ 1t..J · œ o 000 0 ... \Da;)N 0 10. . ,." (() .." I 0 , . ... .. \Ø 0\.",.-." ,." till o 000 0 .. O\CDN 0 01. «»ao...". 0 , , ,. . ... CO.",., Hit .. o 000 0 \Ø "-C)N 0 \.0, I ....-:OMI 0 . , ,.. , ..... Ne4'V\ ~ .. .... .. .. .. 1.1... ... 1'1 I" I' .. w a: :) ... ..... o z W Q. X 161 ..... Q CIJ U) w w en .....cn~ W 4I)&I)..J.....Œ .... WI-o..uc CI: ........a......: ctn~La..:;:):a.u ..JWCW\f)Q: c.........z W>-VJ "»œc""'..cnu.... -C"'CD zw ....... "'OWCIt .-cWLIJ-IWlØv) W"'1eLlJ~v)cc Z .... >.. ..... -C I CLJ:"'O~.:c~o ~ I.&J or: ....J &...J (,t·.) 141 I.&J ~ :z: w c,. .-... Q:: .... '< w.... '> ';.::' ....:' :.J Z .... G... 0 Q t.,¡j .~:. t\. ... .... LaJ ..J G) c U .. .... u ..... ~ ~ L.J '" .... 0-...., ....c.:J "'0 ... :') CD >- a: c .}: CD .... .... ..J cac h..:) '" ... ...u -c ... u w ., CÐ o . c z ...NN'tIf\QOOO OOOON"'.......\C II\\t\&nLne.t\"''''1t\ .. )l- t.) z w CJ c o o lO . GO .... N .. ..., c o u .... lAJ c..o o :::J 0) M o ,." ... . . \D an .. o o "". . "" ..... tilt . . ... I . ... c.ø z .... ... -' .... CD >- U Z L..I (.:J C . ~ w .... z ~ ..J CV) .... vt ca,u ........ o ..... "" .. 0\ '" o ...... ~ . >-L6... 0\ ....0 "'" "" ~ c.:J uz>-c oma: ........""'&1..1 c....ct:> ::tWO " zCX)~u 0......... o ......~ LtJ ,." .......:. ... uVJ......... , ::).....\.û...l \D 'QOZ '" 0 Z Q:WC. Q..J:.J:L...a t-ut- o ., zx.o::. t4 ~.....,..o... .........z o Z:'",uw o Q ",",2: .." t-4C1)LAJ..JZ . ......,.......,œ .., c ...... CD 1.&.1 ... a:UCQ]It t.JZUI,¡JC Q.w Z'-' Q'.!J~~ < 0-' LaJ :Z:L&..C .. %>-~Z(.J .......:)....a ....0 ..., Oua:z z %CZ ~."... .... .... Q ~\I),.....z 0........ 0 ....."'...~..... V'txz..... c, ". -, ~ 4IC ;.e x.....o... ... ...."'1C":)..... Z"'CCDc.J Z u......... ~)- IX.... , ~...I.IJt-a: <.D....:z:zc QU...oQ. ct: c.J a.. 0 Z . ... Q &.J en... ZN ""''''''CI)C... &nZ~ ... .. .....zw"'.... ~cuu.au Q:%UU '-'Iyc....'" Q.. >w :;)cI)~a:... cncnZa.JC """'Ln7: I UC C eUÞ-4>-tX "-c~""a. . 0 .... ......a::ucn zo.. ... IAJI.&J L&.Z ....z>-OLtJ a)Za:» :. -ea: u.lW Uwzen I ..... C) :::) '" c..... iI: .... c.:t....w... C CX4IC .... vtz'-&,¡. C -0: L\. .... Zo~..r O~Z ... V)z....u '-" ........~..... Z Q 4(....1 CUQ:CD 2:......;:):) ..JOG.. ,~ U N:JZ'" ....a..UJO ~ 0\ Lf\ II In Z Q ~ ... u z ::;) .... .- "- Q (It ... tI) .... c" Z o u w u .... ... .:a: L.tJ en en .... : ... ''- V') Z-J ....Lú Z Zz c.. ....;1; ....u c Q.V) M U1 Uw .....u ....u œc c Q.-J . ,.z "'0 ..... ..... z..... ':)Ctft %UZ 'E::.a 00.... uw.... C '-'ON zz.... ....C2 '-' 4IIf cu""' a:....~ '::)..o em U;;)- za...... w .... ....z ,..o~ CD % ~:x: .cnc 1It:)u . "'WI' -Jf ~ w t-: ..; .... en ~ ex ... CQ;.. UI.4..C ."" t...U) owo a:z .....:)c "'0 :)wx u... Or:»..... ...... .c: 3r ..Jt.\. a:I (!J :;:)CJZ G.z..... ..~ ... hJ L.-. ...J x.o:» .......1/') wz 'A.I>O t-wu no z , coo a::zz Q.cc . ... . zz Q <l1li( ..... w ... ... C %X Q:a:w OQt-1 >-Lt..> c:zw a:....o: LaJ-IZ X.co ... u .... ...... 'zu ...IX::::) LtJUO z....c ...r:....a: (:) 0.... tJltO a:ZQ t.&J'CZ a.. c tit >-LaJ'-' ...UZ MQ:... u:)w:: 0% o.nc .......a: ~ " 2: C O&.JG: .....cQ.. .... ..... c>-' ~oc 0:0::2 CLUJ It. ..... 2 ." ,.. ..... t ~J . ....t:) t) ,."J ... ~~o c :,):) LC W uwW ZX% c...... ... '.J) 0 Q ....zz u)C"C V) ~.VJ ..If-- -'....z 4UL6.I UZZ ...:;)... ZOO: x.u~ (..) Q.. WZLAJ ....OQ Z lIJX:>- QO.... ..... U .... > U ow a=xa 4........ . N c ... LtJ U Z C t- el) M en CIJ c ..J 4C Z Q .... .... tIC I: a:: o .... Z M Q Z c ..J c U . .......,J 0::.... Wu ..JZ U::. Q -'U '" z>- QQ: ..... ,.., .... CJIt ........ Q. z,., we z xz c::ttC U~ WtÞ &1:0 a:: -a- t- a:z 00 a.t-t ð...c.II D... V» LaJ \.1...1 Lt.&.IJ el- t- an..... -' &..1m Cc ....u '> OLtJ a:::z:: a.... . ,." ~ ~ (,l z ~ .... z .... c .... -.. z z..... C-c ....7: ... U , ::;)V) QWJ Co:: Q::=» Q.c w z:u -Co Q:a: <-'a.. o ~o Q.z C ~ 2>- ..... U 0..... ... .. >0 o a.. 0:: a.~ z >- .... . Q)'" ~ ... ..... N UJ '" ... en .. ,.... .. =~ W u ~ ~ t..n... Q ~ x: "'".3 ..., 2:0 ::J Q L&J . C ... ,,'ct: þ-. '-':J X CZ~... a: ...... ~ ...z~,.. ~ .....:I:: .... ...... c u ..... z ...U) ~ .....z ..... 2: .... ~ .... QIIC, ~u C E~C t.:J ..... Q 0 Z :CZ~Q .... C ~ Q t&.I ~ ~ ..... cnZ<1I) ..... .......J c '> Q:~ CD or: .. l:) W:)~II) a. CJ ~ "" :)u a: tnc<::) ... .... . Q .. Z ..... Q. )( ...... o L&J ... 4IC x: M ... eI) &..J . e e e ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, provides, at Article XIII, Section 7, that the City Council may appoint three (3) ,residents who shall not be members of the City Council and who shall be, qualified voters and real property owners, as the Board of Equalization, and WHEREAS, the following residents, real property owners and qualified voters of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, were appointed members of the Board of Equalization for the year 1981, on January 12, 1981. Charles O\~.en Clifford Griffith Jess Nelson and WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, provides, at Article XIl1, Section 8, that the City Council shall fix the time of the first meeting of the Board, which shall be the second Monday in May, or as thereafter practicable, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that the first meeting of the Board of Equalization for the year 1981, be fixed as Monday, May 11, 1981, at 5:30 p.m., at the City Hall, and at such times and dates thereafter to which such meeting may be adjourned. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of January, 1981. Dick Faram - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary .. APPROVED7 AS TO FORM I .../ L/æ~ ,:/ Rex McEntlre - City Ie THIS ITEM REFERS TO ITEM e .e 7J¿ - / I /'? IV / /'} , " {. e THIS ITEM REFERS TO ITEM e e ¿;</ .. ;-. -;--) !-r¿ - ¿;:¿ ~ t: ~ If ~ ..; .,} ~: "7 t; ~:: ~ G ~ ~ It i ~ I i ¡ j 1 ~ i t ; ! ! ~ i ¡ í i t t t I I 1 ¡ "- --:> '- / /' -:> T,J-¿" -~ I re THIS ITEM REFERS TO ITEM ~~ e .~. e e y .:.. ß~- 0 DATE: SUBJECT: Discussion on News Article for Mid-Cities Ne\A1S on the City of North RichlandHillsl progress in 19~O. DEP ART~'ENT: Library BACKGROUND: Each year in the "progressll issue of the r,1id-Cities, the City publishes an ad and an editorial. The ad in past years has shown a picture of the City Hall and other pictures of interest, suggested by City Staff. Usually the final pictures and ad layout are determined by the Mid-Cities Staff Artist. The editorial is drafted by the City Staff and final article is determined by space limitations and Mid-Cities Staff, as far as I can ascertain from talking with one of their representatives. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve "proof" of ad and editorial copy for the Mid-Cities progress edition. BUDGETED ITErr1: YES X NO ACCOUNT NU~1BER: Promotional y ,,-~"'~ - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - _ - _ _ - - _ -_ __~~~"!:-::~V/.!:!::-:~2..~_ _~. ://þ ,,---~,.-/ / .z:::~ -f J, / J } / ..4'Y7 ¿?M. .' ~. Y ./) ,,' ¿)L:¿-. ~.e2. ~ r <.. ¡ ,,)-- p p' d; ~ -r-i- ; b u.7€ d - P'/ /". 4'''' ",. ,/ tPl ~ e--I-; .-~. < TO: Chuck Williams, City ·Manager DATE January 20, 1981 e FROM: Wanda Calvert, Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Platting & Zoning Cases for City Council, January 26, 1981 PS 80-60 APPROVED by P & Z PZ 80-36 APPROVED by P & Z POSTPONED by CC Request of P. F. Carpenter for replat of Lot 2A, Block A, Reddings Revision. Request of Marvin Smith to rezone Lot 15R2, Block 1, Richland Oaks Addition, from its present classification of 1F-12 to a pro- posed classification of. Local Retail. This property is located at the southeast corner of Harwood Road and Grapevine Hwy. PZ 80-42 APPROVED by P & Z POSTPONED by CC Request of Dr. James Waggener to rezone Tract 17D and a portion of Tract 16B, Abstract 1606, from its present classi- fication of 1F-7 to a proposed classi- fication of Local Retail. This property is located on the east side of Davis Blvd.t one block south of Emerald Hills Way. Request of Bill Lightfoot & Doyle Compton (The Channel Cat Restaurant) to rezone a portion of Lot 2, Block 50, NortEast Addition, from its present classification of Commercial to a proposed classification of Commercial-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located at 5249 Davis Blvd. Request of Billy J. Ward to rezone a portion of Lot 6, Calloway Acres Addition, from its present classification of Commercial to a proposed classification of Multi-Family. This property is located on the west side of Parchman St., approximately 673 feet north of Grapevine Hwy. e PZ 80-44 APPROVED by P & Z PZ 80-46. APPROVED by P & Z PS 80-61 APPROVED by P & Z Request of Billy J. Ward for replat of Lot 16K, Calloway Acres Addition. e To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records DATE: Jan. 20, 1981 ~ ff SUBJECT: PS 80-60 Replat of Lot 2A, Block A, Reddings Revision e DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning BACKGROUND: This property is zoned "Commercial II but has an old building on the property which does not meet the com~ercial code. All the Engineer's comments have been met. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company requested a 5 foot easement on each side of this property, but since the existing building sets so close to the property line on one side, they could only grant the easement on the oposite side. The Planni'ng & Zoning Commission ap~roved the replat subject to the Engineer1s comments and the granting of the additional easements requested bj' Southwestern e Bell . CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or Denial BUDGETED ITE~1: YES NO. X -- ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ~---~~-~~----~-~~-~-~-~------~~------~~-----~-~-~------~~-~-~~-~--~-~~~---~~~-- e Page 8 p & Z t1i nutes December 18, 1980 I ( I ( \ / \ ·e .----' There being no one else Chairman closed the . Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Tucker, to app~ove PZ 80-45 as requested. This motion carried 4-0. PS 80-60 Request of P. F. Carpenter for replat of . Lot 2A, Block A, Reddings Revision. Mr. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Carpenter in his request. Mr. Stembridge said they had received the Engineer1s letter and that they will comply with all the Engineer's comments. He said they \'1; 11 also grant the addi tiona 1 ease- ments that were requested by the telephone company. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request to please come forward. :e There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. PS 80-60 APPROVED r~r. Tucker moved, seconded by f':lr. Ne\'Jman, to approve PS 80-60 subject to the Engineer's comments and to granting the additional ease- ments as requested by the telephone company. This motion carried 4-0. PZ 80-46 Request of Billy J. Ward to of Lot 6, Calloway Acres Addition, present classification of Com, lal to a proposed classification 'ulti-Family. This property is ed on the, west side of Parchman St~ , approximately 673 feet north of Gr lne Highway. Bill Ward came forward. He said he thought this property was zoned Multi-Family when he bought it, but found recently that it was zoned Commercial. r,1r. vIa rd sa i d he ha s a buyer, La rry \'Jood, ~Jho wishes to build triplexes on this property. e e e I I \, (' Delbert R. Stembridge consulting engineer January 21 1981 Wanda Calvert, Coordinator Planning & Zoning Dept. City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lot 2A, Blo'ck A, Reddings Revision Dear Mrs. Calvert: In response to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's request for additional easements on the above referenced Lot, we have added an additional 5-foot utility easement on the east side of the Lot. The 5-foot easement requested on the west side of the Lot cannot be added as there is an existing building which at one point extends to within 1.5 fe~t of the west property line. We have also added "Block A" as requested by Knowlton-English- Flowers. If there is any further questions regarding this Lot, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, r\ f\ ¡ \. ~\1, JD \ t<~ ~,-. e ert R. \ P.E. DRS/et 3729 Flory. North Richland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-1363 e ,~ff~ ... ~'1~=J \~.,' \,~~ ~:~/ Southwestern Bell First State Ba~~ Bldg. Room 425 1901 Central Dr. Bedford, Texas 76021 December 9, 1980 ( , . City of North Richland Hills Planning and Zoning Dept North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Wanda Calvert, In reference to re-plat, Redding Revision, Lot 2~ please see additional Easement Request on attached plat recorded in red. Questions on this matter may be referred to Leo Rendon on 267-01510 e r u ç~cJ~ III.E. ~{illiams Manager-OSP Engineer Northeast District e ( (.. e KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-[)i.1l1l1s December 11, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-955, CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS, REDDINGS REVISION ADDITION, LOT 2A, BLOCK A, PS 80-60, REPLAT e We have reviewed the captioned materials for the subject subdivision and offer' the following comments: 1. It appears that this replat should be designated as lot 2A, Block A, based on the information provided in the Acknowledgement and Dedication statement. If this is the case, then "Block A" should be added to the heading. 2. Utility companies should be contacted concerning the replat in accordance with standard City Procedures. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. / ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R~~A/ljc cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities e SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BE:DFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-621t. METRO/267-3367 DATE: 11-25, 80 1-20-81 ( \ e SUBJECT: PZ 80-36 Zoninq request from IF~12 to Local Rptõìl . ' DEP ARTf"1ENT: Plannin~ and Zoning BACKGROUND: Marvin Smith wishes to build a'4000 Sq. ft., one-story office building on this property which he 'says is dlstressed property that has a large drainage ditch on it. .1 . , Thi s property ; s ..1ocatéd on the south sî de of Harwood Road at Grapevi ne Hi ghway.- .There is approximately 4000 ft. frontage on Harwood Road. There were 12 property owners within 200 feet of said,proDertv who were contacted. Ther~ were several property owners who contested this request.. e The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request. .. If approved, this property will need to be replñt~prl hpfore a building permit ~ñn be issued. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial nf the zoning request. - . BUDGETED ITEr"1: YES '., NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ,. --~--~--~--~---------------~-~--~--~--~----~---~~---~-~---~~--------~-------~-- e ( ( I. e 7 · 1 l I ~ Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to confirm the appointment of George C. Tucker to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mo~1on carried 6-0. 8. Councilman Hood moved, seconded by Councilman Thoma~_ý~ to appoint Dr. Dale Gaskill of the Birdville 5chp-o·;f;'·' District to the Community Cable Advisory Pa,!)~ .---, ~lotion carried 6-0.~?::;þ1:Y ...$1"'- þð:;;~ , 9. Mayor Faram advised the,cßt:í~il the Planning and Zoning ~~~~~~~~~n recom,~pproval subject to the Engineers' ., ¡_rl./'";¡;'- :.~ coun.cil~~ubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to a .~e P5 80-53. carried 6-0. ..... ._- ".' 10. This item postponed. r. l 11. This item postponed. 12. Councilman Brady asked to be disqualified from the discussion on this request because of a personal interest. r¡layor Faram excused Councilman Brady from the table.~~· .' ø~":~.I Hr. Oarrel Hood, attm~ney, t'epresenJ:J.R~:sked the r·1ayor to delay this requ~s.;t,,-f,tJr five minutes. tì'1 r. ~~1 00 d . s tat e d t h a~~ < C.OJJ;Retiñíã n Ken n a \'1 as 0 n his \vay to the meet 1 ng ~~~..Þ.~ . ..~*;,¡¡.;_.;#~~;,¡t.~ ~~'r Faram grant.ed the request._ ___ _ t .~~. December 8, 1980 Page'3 CONFIRt1ATIO APPOINTrf - OF GEOR -~. . TUCKER LANNING & ZONING .(" COrU'lI 5S I ON APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF APPOINT~1ENT OF DR. DALE GASKILL TO COM~1UNITY CABLE ADVISORY PANEL APPROVED PS 80-53, REQUEST OF SCHICK SHADEL HOSPITAL FOR FINAL . PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK D, CALLOWAY FARt-1S ADDITION APPROVED PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 80-36, REQUEST OF t·1ARVIN Sri1ITH TO REZONE LOT 15R, BLOCK 1, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION, FROM IF-9 ONE FAMILY DWELLING TO LOCAL RETAIL POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-36 POSTPONED PUBLIC H OF RON LUSK, TO REZONE TRACT lOA1, FROM IF-9 ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS TO 2F-9 TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS -~ ... '. . .' PAGE 5 p & Z October 23) 1980 \ \. Mr. Greenfield said the Commission could not override the zoning or., -; nce which requires a minimum dep f 110 ft. He said the Commission c approve this request subjec the engineer's COIT~ents and th omment 06 be dealt with prior with thg final plat. / e \ e Chairman called for anyone "tolishing to speak regarding this request to please come forward. There being no one to speak, the. Chairman closed the public hearing. }Ir. Bo'tven moved, seconded by }lrs. Nash to approve PS 80-50~ subject to the engineer's comments. Motion carried 3-0. PZ 80-36 Request of Marvin Smith to rezone Lot 15R2, Bloçk 1, Richland Oaks Addition) from its present classification of IF-12- One Family D\velling to a proposed classification of Local Retail. This property is located at the southeast corner of Harwood Road and Grapevine lligh\vay. e ( Marvin Smith came forward. He said this property. is :a t the corner of Har\.¡ood Road and Grapevine Highway and lies o'n the south side of Harwood Road. Mr. Smith said this is distressed property approximately 30,000 sq. ft. with a 4,000 ft. frontage. He said it is joined on the east by a large drainage ditch. ~~. Smith said he proposed to build a 4,000 sq. ft., 1 story building with a glass front a~d plenty of off-street parking. e Mr. Smith said he did not want a convenienc store such as a 7-11, he is interested in office space. He said he would like to have a real estate office, doctor's office, insurance agency, beauty shop, or barber shop. Mr. Smith said tllere would be 3 or 4 spaces ..' ( Page 7 p & Z October 23, 1980 c-e Alice Nunley, 5145 Jennings Drive, came fon7ard. She said she \.¡asn' t sure if she was for or against this request. Mrs. Nunley asked if it would be stipulated that they must build certain things. Mr. Horvath said that at the time of the final plat is submitted, they would have to submit construction plans and layout. Mrs. Nunley said what if they said it would be office space but then decided to build something else. Mrs. Nunley said she has a simular situation on Grapevine Hwy. She said the neighbors do not like her, either. re \ , Mrs. Nunley said this vacant lot does create snake and rat problems; the city would be able to increase their tax revenue, but there is some flooding. She said the flooding happened when they built Grapevine H~vy., but to put more water into this ditch now might cause problems. }Irs. Nunley 'asked if they could re- route the ditch. Mr. Greenfield asked Mrs~ Nunley if she was saying she thought it could present a problem. Mrs. Nunley said she felt it should be re-routed. Mr. Horvath said if the zoning is changed~ then before the plat is approved, our engineer would go out and make them bring the drainage up to code Mrs. Nunley said then whe would be in favor of the approval of this zoning request. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. . 1-1rs. Doyne Bird, 8320 Dude Ct. said they have lived here 20 some odd years and hoped to stay 20 more years, but they have had to fight many battles. She said they do have a flooding situation. Mrs. Bird said if they were to get a 9 inch rain, there would be serious problems. P .AG E 9 p & Z October 23, 1980 (·e Mr. Burroughs said he was concerned about the retainer wall, ~t would have to be at least 5 ft. He said he had tried to get the City to do something about this drainage. Mr. Burroughs said he had lost about 20 cubic yards of his yard. l'olr. Burroughs said he doesn't kno't.¡ about the snakes arid rats. Mr. Burroughs read a.letter from Cecil & Gladys ~vright \-Jho live at 5140 Jennings Drive and were unable to attend. The letter stated they were opposed to this zoning request. Mr. Burroughs said he moved there to raise his family and plans to live right there the rest of his life. He said his house had never been flooded. Mr. Greenfield asked Mr. Burroughs to sho\v the Commission ,,,here his and the Wright's property lies. (e Mrs. Jerry Cozby~ 5125 Jennings Drive, came forward. Mrs. Cozby asked if the city has a master zoning plan. She said srle felt this would be spot zoning. }Ir. Green:Eie.ld said the city does have a master'plan which is in a plan of revision. Mrs. Cozby asked if the Commission would ~onsider this spot zoning. Mr. Greenfield said they did not. Þlrs. Cozby said they have a very nice neighborhood, but have approximately 5 lots which could be used for businesses. Mr. Greenfield asked Mrs. Cozby to show where her property lies. Mr. Greenfield asked Mrs. Cozby if her property had been flooded. (e }lrs. Cozby said it had not been flooded. (e ce e I PAGE 11 P & Z October 23, 1980 Mrs. Nunley said she feels Mr. Smith is being denied the best use of his property. Mr. Greenfield said the singalization was approved last week. Mark Howe came forward. He said he was ,.¡ith American National I-lortgage and \vanted to speak, in favor of this request. He said as far as the use of this property, it would increase the tax revenue and was well suited for the proposed use. 1-1r. H01;ve' said in regards to the flooding, this is their best opportunity to get the drainage fixed; the City Engineer would see to it that it is improved. Mr. Howe said the city \vould probably be longer in correcting this than Mr. Smith would be. J. Dolan Lunsford> 3816 Diamond Loch E.) came fOTIvard. He said he is the owner of ~he property. Mr. Lunsford said he bought the property 'tvith the intention .of building a home on it, but when they went to widen Hanvood Road, 3 ft. was taken off his side and none off TCJC's éide which made it not large enough. Mr. Lunsford said he was then assessed $2,300.00 for curb and gutter. Mr. Lunsford said the lady was wrong, he had had this property for sale for 10 years and had only 2 buyers - both were for cornmercial use. Mr. Horvath said the signals have been approved and the bids let on the signal lights at Grapevine Highway and Hanvood Road. Mrs. Nash asked when they would be put up. Mr. Horvath said as soon as possible. Mr. Marvin Smith said he could appreciate some of the people's problems, but he plans to build a professional type building. He said if the zoning is not changed, the neighbors will still have tlieir problems they have had for .years. }lr. Smith said \vhen 11e goes in and improves it, it will be an Request of Charles Beane to rezone Lots 18-28, Block 42Bl, Richland Terrace Addition, from its present classific of Specific Use-Community Unit Dev. opment to a proposed classificat~' 'n of Multiple Family. This prog ty is located on the east side Cloyce Street, approximately 44 eet south of Maplewood Drive. Request of Charles ~~e for replat of Lots 18R, 19R, & .}~ä;lock 42Bl, Ricnland Terrac~Addition. Charles BeaLame forward. He said this pro~~ty is approximately one block. E;li"st of the City Hall. .,.f.~'" ./ Mr/rBeane said this property is in )11· small lots for TO\vn Houses. He <~said he wishes to build quadroplexes. .9 ' / ~' Mr. Beane said he' needed to replat ~r? this property into 3 lots so he could / build each one on a separate lot. ./ /~" / //> ~~ ,r.:...;p ,,;?t;/ .;/1',. PZ 80--.3'7 APP:ßdVED ...1'''.r <.;rP/ Pi\GE 13 p & Z October 23, 1980 (·e PZ 80-36 APPROVED PZ 80-37 PS 80-43 (e . - e ...·t-:'r PS 80-43 ,A.PPROVED [' Mr. Greenfield said they want the best possible use of the land. He said if the land is to be used for Local Retail the ordinance requires a fence as a buffer and the drainage would have to be taken care of. Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash to appro~e PZ 80-36 as requested. Motion carried 3-0. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to these requests to please come forward. There being no one to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash .to approve PZ 80-37 as requested. Motion carried 3-0. \. b$.¡J;Þ;')· ,~.:;.;/;}v-. "iÝ'" ~Y::1>:~~~~~~~~~~'~.~~~~"~:Þ-!\!Þ.l»--~~~~.~.~~~1'~"~~'V..o-~ ~1I<1~1!!JÞtW::\i~-~. lIU1Kta Mrs. Nash moved, seçonded by Mr. Bowen to approve PS 80-43. Motion carried 3-0. í ~.~"'Ø\T1;. Iif./\ ..... / I e e e KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENG INEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas October 14, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 75118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZON I NG PL~f--R·E·VI-E"W," ·P-Z· ·8'0..-..3..6.... .. .. . .. .. .. . ÎF--fi -fõ=[~~~~ -_.- - ... - - - - - .. .. ~ .. . We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both th~ Planning ?~ Zoning Commission and the City Council. R~lA/l j c cc: r~r. Charl es \'J. i¡Ji 11 i ams, Ci ty ;'1anager r ~ r. Gary C a 1 d \,1/ e 11, B u i 1 din 9 0 f f i cia 1 Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities 550 FIRST STATE BANK SLOG, · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 , \ f.:.~' . ./ / ///h; L;..-j~ ,¿.:.-{ ~J ~.< ~ L-. Y ( J - ¡'.j _ j~_ f? {) LL<-~ / ...A /~. p1. 9 ð..3l. . (, ¥ '!" 'C :;~J;J / c( 01', Þ õ) A' '. ,-~ (~ r- J" /" ,/)"" /- Q PROTEST AGAI1-..JS-r ZONING Cl'iANGE VlE, ruE UNDERSIGNED, protest the chan,-5':; in zoninJ in th~ City of :'ioJ:th H.ichland Hills, Texas. the notice ot which is hereby artílch(>(! as Exhibit A and made a pan hereof. We, and each of us .lurth~r repn:seilt that we art'; all owners of rc~al property in said City of North Richland ¡-Hils, T.:xas, and that we, the undersi;š1.1-::d, constiturc twenty (20)?;) percet1t or more of the followiï1š: The owners, either of the real property within th~ area to be rc-zoned. or of the real property adjaccnt within two hundred e (200) (;..>.?t or said proposed revision (in such zoning). 'Ne, and each ot us funh\:.'r n:pr~sent that we protest the change proposed in said Exhibit I'. ¡ dltached hereto as provided by the laws of the State of Texas, and as fllrthEr'r pr0\7id;.~d by the 'arious ordinances of said City of North Richland Hills, T,.:xas. and as funhèr provided in [he CÜy Council Rules of proc.~our<,;;> for sa id Cuy of North Richland Hills, Texas. We, the unckrsi¿~ne(1 prot!,;'st ¿¡¿;ainsr such ('hal1~e by rhis ',vririn:5 to rh£:' City COiJl1cil of såid City or l'!ûnh Hichlanti HUts, T~xas, through the City Ma\1a~er Of ~<lic1 Cir.y. '\V::. and l'd ch of ;.1::: fun!-l:'" r rcp r -.;sem tha t Wt:: l.iv c at lhe ëdd rc E:S S ('c OµPO&j t,' ,,:<1 d¡ I! , .' I I i ~)r odrA¥d:'~¡~~~S [J~~ ()\v: I , I ok f' 'l:/J~~J1 ~~/; ".l\.ppgi-:ss'----s-/-?-/¿~¿1_..("7~~ ~ ])~ ( ~~~~,~ ~~ j-¡L/i) ~~L,~_j W _:2. 01( / / ..f' ~ ,,'~ .s/~<.j Je~I)/)I/')i.::s .~~"'z./ 3 ok ~:~\~~/:,tJMdU s> 4/ yn"/~íP 4Y. I \ 1 [\ j L...-/ ~ «" /? ~" . \-__.. 4- 01C~11 /)fi,~~7 I ,-J J-lll¿~~/J~~Vr'-~·/~ ..' )\.... (/~ '. L;.::./ //. ""1"'> ·~7 I..' /\...."-/1.. f/ ':.:", /' A. /;7 / -.../f~ ../ 0.') / 3 .~ vr~":J" AU ...--d< '"' '" ,'¿l{.. . - üK. ./, ~'--''-'''' c/ '~-~ ~ ,-~,-~y ~-'-I._ / ¡_. ...........~v/ ''([,_ ;; ~ :: l ~_,--~.-- · .:~:?f <-L-tAAk~.~.. .-h..J 0/3:?...j'__ ;;:?1¿-? LJ~ p~~~ ~---_.- J _ I ~ . t/ Q /~ C .,Yt~.../ J..._---__. / (,.,-- Î .' f ( /F1 ~ ~ t 0 ¡.... lc~' -: ~"?k._j /(.- . '~::!y/ =' / / ~ Y~..4- ~¿...' l" a \..., /~ /\ _~.. ' [) ..~, ¿u~ JJt&4~'J ~/Â:;"~ ÂY-,,-. . I ?- -1 7 . : ìj , ._ . _ :""#,,? O~\J ;/ /¿.' /. '.' " -,- .:,j. ¿.A<:-:""..../C~7'-.¿'\...-, '-..-it--y- /£~ , 0 / ~ ,S- rI.- /fJ ~ .' L/V.;.'" . /.~ ,..\/. ¿,..-?.....,., '" ...""'- 1 .. .. ,J.. . __. '. /. '., /.:.. . .' '¿' ...,.........<-. ~ ,- ~ /L/ ~=~-~~~ -- - ~ A_/~- ~~ fJ-~ 'e ~- v ~. ~~ ~ ~uz<~L ~. r/~ . ~\ J I';-/,;-;-~- L/ "'<,/ i' ,,(. ,C- L~ L/I,.... S/L-- / ..,'\ ' /Gé..~ Á/.!cu~L JJ" )/{u I ~~ ,( J I,i.~ / - '~~lJ~S ~ß0Vv 0,-" ~l./~v/ ¡,/' ,/ /' '- \ , ' ','- ¿/ L " .ø;r ,e::- ~" ot -;' -) ..:'77 c { ('/'--__ ----~ ' , /1, ,j/jl \P(J,74j;;" 1/'Y7.'" /&I:;Þ~~ 3 Î~' · / /' /' l:() tcJ 7}la.''J.--Kl~ , 0 '" "" \""-~ '- '\<. \ r) \",' \. '\~:. ~~" '-i.J, <~. -r\ ¡.. to .~, "~ " '---> "" -'--->-.: \. \,.J"~~~ ·d \ . "-\ , ') Å /',~ 'v:J. C-<--z- vJ 0../)7'5>'/ l'-<z-<L ~ ./~ ,., ,:., ,.-e:- 'fto 7' e /1A .; 5 ..... .... ......«~ .. . }, =- ;4 ( 4... . .,.e ..'~ l \ \. ,3·s-' ~ - '..~~ Q 1- gD :, : .... .~ \ .. ~ . ~IOI~T ~T ZOIIK CUJIGI. .' ., . ~'.... e..:. ":w. -' .. ...... - <....... cY ,:.....,. ',..1..<;", . ..- ... ,.. . . . , -. ~. ~ '., -1'-.: ..:' . ..... . _,. . ,. .'i~ ;.' WE 9 THE UNDERSIGNED, Pl'Otaat the chaA..' 1a, :ccûng ,in the City, of North RichJ,d HUla, Tezu. tM ftO,t1ca ofwh~da ~b~rebYa:t~ci .. Exh1b1.t A and . . j . '. tude a part hereof. V.þ', -4 e.ac:b of ua farther repreael1t that we are aU ovn.er. , . , of real property in the Richlad 0" Addid.cxa in the said City of North Rich1aad Hilla. Texas. We the œår:dpec! proteat· a¡ai.ut such change: by this writing to the City Council of saiel City of North R1chlad BiUa. Texas, through the City Manager of said City. We, a.nc:t each of ua f.~~.r repn.ent that we lift at the addreal1 set oPpoe1te each' of- our naaea. belcWt ~iÅ..\fE.: ", . Il '--. ~. Ann.R~ ,)/ .3 à ffi-~~ ýÇþ ./1 .:! C ~~~: 7ç¡J~'( L,¿Lt-t_ " 'lS-~ /1--. "/ /,j -7 _. _ ~ ) 2é/ /0 (<:;//,//#/)/':; "~-//£4-___"",..>/.~. ' ~~ YJ,~ '\ . " r-.". )/. ~ )., \ \ · 1-, \ . ",. ~5 / ~ Y'·.,..~"-e..--J'L--71.-z¿<-;1. ~T -5 -__~___. '. // / //7 v ./'.. ,/ '7 l., ,L~/Z-'-~~Y;'r '::'J,-~ ~ -- ¿ /--:" . /' - /, -: .7 / / " / ~i-£ ~7.d C\. /Í-:/v ~~ . À ' ,- ¡' / L~ , \!, .A } 1-J ---ý- ~ .. )-~::./)--t/~ c(/rk,/ . , ''¡,' d '- r.... '"-, k \ ( 2 --:; --j"? ,.~'~ .. o :~ l/,~~··]~/~'l ~ ~~ L/ /' ~. 'ì ,. "-) /'"' 1 _" _ ~ .Å .:;- /.2. J 7<7'2-'?-~.-.:? - l 'ìY ," % .~ ,« / <, - /. ,1 '- '~ ; """" · / -...:' "Y'.. ?_? /' \J ",) ,/" r,,' ." .' _,,> ' ;/ c--- ~. "../ ....--. t.- . i . [' (: o>o('y _2__/ ¿ (~ ~- /a~~f:~ ~ll¡~ ~1 p~ "f ; . .. . h~WL' //:""'J .J2-í-'''L¿,~ /.J--è~-"'¿_..-£A..Ý~ . C7) I' '/ r¡ . ' C . /'7 _ l ) ~71lAI/-:J- LY_5 b '7 7.jv{f/ Î 'Î " .// 1/'; i /':) / '- ,il/" Þ . ~4l:- II ' ~0S?~~ S;07 . J ·f' t~ ... ./ .. {J~ ~ - / ... ~, ~ (:' ....J.. ,. ~ £-' eo...; ~~.~ . I--~~ _, ? /'/ . //" t;- /' (~' ~ / .Á__Q_ 2-L L£.~L, " c:;/ ..' J (¡..IJ- ? 3 ~ 0 i9-~-cÞ¿-<-- ~:- ?' - () j] ~~ :1 ú ¡LcJ{^- if 7 ~ "- - ,'.... : ..".. .. ,,-'. ,;;,f;,:c'.",:2'-'c ',i ",;~~)~;~~~::¡:"t:¡~:~.;;"~;' .~ ... , ~ '. ;,., : J, ~:, :,- ~'- -'...... ··...1"'.. ..~~:. ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ .; f , t, t I ~ ti It I J ! I I ,G .. <i ;~:j '!' -'12" i:. ".; -..- ",~~~' -'...-"'-..-.........--, "-- -..--_,---,- -""'-'-.,...,. .-.r-"- ____........__.._. "1"~-~ .::~ ~7':) . ~·'''''.''''''-~'f{~, _"'~""": m. ........ i.< . ,,'! ...'~' :'J ., ~'~~,,_,\~,:,"_._. _ '.~'~, 2: ~ . .. " -= r· .,., - -..... - .... ~ _ ~,.. .. « <II<_'t' ~ _ _ _ ...... _ -. __ \ ... ,.~""" "1;... C~;, ',-' '~~~-k~~~.~~~ ,t1°(j \ /<:') ....,,"". "t,~ \ ....: - '\I<¡ò"................,;~ ß ..>\ /;/;~~~~. -~-. ,/ /'. \ ,-, "--:'::f J1"~<;~~~~._. '."".i..~ , ",;¡I" '\.. 'c.~'\ . ~ ,~-'.' f" ,~........& --4 " '-" \y~ -i ".~ ~ ..../': - $ ~ ¡....~-, ~-~~.;.~~-:~ 1 -í ~ 1-~ '; ¡j ¡ ..~ :. "=j.,,,t i4 ~.~ ~~ ~ ".\". . . ... ~ ":"' ,,;$--.:.,. , \ flt,..f\ "j,j t¡f. , 4Ì '~"f~ , tlo .. . t' " "..... .......-t \. .~' ~ . .-..,..:~.........~,...,... ....-~;¡O._: .... . "....."..... ,··..."·..",,·...~~~..·--··...·':$o··,·~...-·¡¡.~~1IoÌIÌIr4~~."·..">.,, ',..71Iit".~~.......-tlF.r.........._-f!'"...... ."..,....~ ""'.h~~: _:<o...µ._..... -, . ..'".~.... ....,. ,~~.~ ,~;;..,....~~ .., ,. ~.l..<\;;o.'<...~- '..~ "",,w'" "^..~I p:.%- § I) ..:. ..3 Iø lf~-f :4'i~ .4:~ ~--1~ ,1 ~>t.~. {~; ~ ;,t ,~~~ , ;~"., ."~', ,fl': ~~' ^ ~...:~, .1·4 ¡;~~.;i ¡~P'\'-.... . '~¿;J' .... ... t':~ .., li~··J-~··.· . < ..~ ~I.' ..t( ::''ia' .~..'~~,~~. W .L I~ 'T-C:)oo--~~.- . ; ì -,-,,-..... "'.'.., ".... - . ...._- .,,- _ .~: 2~ ',"¥. i . ~. '"e. I \. ~ ~ t~~~ .~ ~~ l~ .~.{~ '.~ . . ,'. ';'J .~.. )~" .I":':'. ~' .~~ ') '-~J Á t'; t "':.;:: ..... ,'" 1,.', ¡. ~...5.' . t ~ .~ ~~: e. i.."'J1;. ~.: \ . ).--.- --.... -,-..- ,--- I~~' r --.. .--.- ,-- --J J . J l' [ ·~·~~-w.~..~~l: ,'. .'~~~' "L·.Iy::·E ðJ e'~~..J ,. '. t . :AlII 1L t "Jt .,.~ 1II¡!¡'t" . r 0,''''''''' 4#.... ....., .J~. f' """... G .-;- V1/~ ! . . t·,.......:.· '@... . t· ~~ ~:,~:.' i ..~...................'%......"., e:' ) , ·t '-~~ . Jeff·....... c1~" ~."i ~:" ~ ) t~· # -- .:'.'~þ:-' ¡ I ~',¡~~L.~....~:,,;~L~ ~ Ji' .Ii P:;;:iT¡()?¡: 01~ l.5;.~",}}::.i.(1rr¡' 1,11~¡~;~ Wti.P$ .¡,m1¡'.;.'19' ·1:0 ~~! eIn: 'Jf !E :':1-Uj,}\¡) : ¡¡:,;¡~ t <f;.tftÄf,<r: ;;0Ull~1.) 'l~~~ # .~/ ;¡\:<t"fìi' ~ !l"0 1f~~ '1',;;'7:121::'; ?T.æ: E\:Gt1::tD:JJ: In ~J.: :J~..,l,~.·.. ..."....,.itj,"í'"'......~ .~.'., .. R,..-.... ':--,_-.'~.,~. t"!t.,.··.~.., ._.:.." .!~.~i.,r.,.· 1#'., ...). ......... '1\~'if.\ ~'1")' ~i·~·~;\~":.,? s;1·.:.;.l4t,'; }:1;-:; (\l'\'~"'" ~~...~ .~. ~ ~~~'t "'j~ ~'T t!t!"~~; rf4 ~~.~~ ,. ~ . - -".....- - > - T - ..~ .1''''''11' 1.- ~ -~~~. ....."'.~"\,/,"\.......'. :ø'....t.:;.~~...)·..P._.... "~. ,,"t...'l.A!':~J9) ~.~~-g,. ~,_..,,~. 4.01;........__<'1- "'.~ ''W'''~JiIÃ1 2:;'1 ~'::1~:~~) Atrc.· J~ot:&1-f -;¡'l,;~ .~~0~;;¿A~~S: :: :;¡1xr ~~: ll~4 :¡,~lr-~þg :-ED~ !1r;m¡i2\ '!£D.q¡ ~ Tlb~ -~á.~: /~:~~~i;f~~~.\ {. :;·:'~~:~~0~I~: £.~~,~:"i~~} t .~. ...~ t:.~I"\2~ ~ '. . ,¡ ~~::t .~- t ~'~"V'¿" .~"~i: l \"',~ :"1"" C - ,<..' ..~,!¡~~i·~.,.. '*' ~,~ .'1i_,.~~. _ .,~;.¡ '~{~~J:Ö~' &.~ it~ .i¡;:~ ~~J.l~~t :~~ fi(J"1:d;"~1~:;~ t <:":J'~r·t~.~;~ ~i~lc~ ~~t¿t:ii.~i~n~ ¿~.ti'~}. (l ~ t}t. J,f~~J ........ "'t ~t.- ~.... Mf- ~~ ~ ~."'. ....g. .....4f h.,. ~.. ~~r .~'} .... .. 'f~J.;O~ ~.a ali -t~G:J. pi:~t ~ J,- :... t:¡,~ Ji.~~ .td t.\A1~ ~-~: ... : ".;.. ~,' $.i, .~~tf :.~(;f~ ,¿ D i ~~~·t ~ ~'- ;;.:. ~) ~~S' w. ~.Æ3 !å:.'; \ny ·~n Id.~·i, ~ ~~ .r¿"~ ~.;. ..... ~ 7íf ~~. 1i ..~ ~' fo.-: f~t t-o ·1~t:. ,,~~C ~ I~ H1 1'" ~." ..... 11. 6Jð J.!J '..... fJ4~ :t4S~ tù M-~nl ¢-11; x...sz: ~'-.. Jû.8f~,tooirf'o~ ~~ b ,tht ~.:t c ~ª ."~.þ,.~ _..~...q~.u .~- ~-.¡:}.. ~...~.. ~,? ~-""~ r~;,-u-,~ ::;.~.~)....¡::. :f.:.-=.~. :~. .iW. ~. ,Y·;.. .r.!¥.jIf ...t"~~, ~(~~\.¡.k ~.â~ ~"""""'~'.... "_~Q. 'V...--. ':....J W' ~.#~__ pin i~ thp i\V'..~t 1bs:af.':a&id !,~t' Q.~.!rJ4èk ,11 $", .'0'/1 :wI.... ~~ 1Iå1.4..t 11-.ml., fest~c S!1~ ßO'::'~';;l!l~Y'~ ·)~~76 &art9~ ef la:1d·:.~ t:!1r' 1~41f) ~ Doi~~IQ ~~".... 7/ ¿, ...~ ... . .... . . I. ...r':~If~~r ~l ~.L'" tw~t.d Ptàac 3~t'm'~. !:!t. ~f:aJltJJ~ f:.~,·tfr~~t t~! At~~~1Ihettn J../JAt~s G. ~. &i.1J. {i-JrTe-::t; ~:ífpí.'t.~oJäi~tioll of 4- 1óti.N,~ f,ja.t"~ð _ th!!- ~,~~ r::ytMi... ò' . ..' E·' ..... ..... ··'A··..··:'· .' . ":sua.-·O··:·.';·:"·lI"".,;..··~ ·.ñ. .:-...~......_..'....~:.'..;;;~...'.. þ-. . . 7.. + ..,.... .' " ~ ;. ~ _ .' , ,\:....'iõ .., ........,~.:..." š..·'roam ·M.J.·a, ,".~"~QH , .. FOJtT WOITH~T~-t1~' A ~:.. -,.. ..~~,_"""..~ .....".. ''''1 - ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN.ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS) SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSEDJ APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION' AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13~ 1967, AS ~~ENDEO JANUARY 27~ 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: . RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 80-36 the fol1owi:ng described property shall. be rezoned from IF-12-0ne" Fari1ilv ·Dwellinqs·· ' . ". . .~,. . "to Local Retail. ..... .... %,? Being Lot15R~ Block 1, Richland Oaks Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-8, Page 80, Deed Records, Tarrant· County, Texas. This property is located at the southeast corner of Harwood Road and Grapevine Highway. e APPROVED OCTOBER BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS ,1980. 23rd DAY OF ~j;-~A SECRETARY PL ~ JJ:;:J~~-~ _ _ ._~~!LANNING AN '\: N :~_. OMMISSION ~ r6f!~~~ '. IN.G..·,·AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. ,IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF ,1980. MAYOR DICK FARAM . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: ·e CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .~~ DATE: 11-25-80 . l(f)y e SUBJECT: PZ 80-42 Zoninq request from IF-7 to I or~l Rptail - ' DEPJ\RTriENT: Planni~g and Zoning Department BACKGROUND: This property is presently owned.by thp YMrA and has a 125 foot frontage on Davis Blvd.~ and they wish to build a doctor's clinic on this propert.y. L t . This property is located on the east side of Davi~ Rlvrl 3 one block south of Em era 1 d Hill s ~~ ay ..- There were 19 1 etters sent to property 'o'tJners wi thi n 200- feet of S~ i d ·prQ!,~rty. Ther~ was no one'who contested this request. e The Planning and Zoning Commissiòn recommended approval of this zoning request. .. The City Council postponed this request since the owners' had a suit against the Clty. This suit was dismissed. - CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request. BUDGETED I TEr~l: YES ' NO X ACCOUNT NUt'Î8ER: N/A . . .- --~-----------~------~--------~----~-------~---~-~----~------------------------ e .~~ ... __.. r . _,~ßOa e· e e . ILL~~ ---, ¡ .i J ...) ..... I I f º i l V~· v ¡ ~~; 1. T ~ ¡ ~~~ . f/II .. '" "*""" . -. I . " 'ì J_ü l...f/. NO. 236-61903-80 YOUNG MEi'J' S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ÞŒTROPOLITAN FORT ~iORTH § § § § § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF vs. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. 236TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MOTION FOR NON-SUIT NOW COMES YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH, and moves this Court to enter an Order dismissing the above referenced and numbered cause for the follo\ving reason: 1. Plaintiff no longer desires to prosecute this action. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff prays this Court enter an Order dismissing this action, assessing costs of court against the Plaintiff. Respectfully submitted, McLEAN SANDERS PRICE HEAD & ELLIS ' By &X /: 2 ~.~. Carter L. Ferguson Bar Card No. 06909 00 1700 Two Tandy Center Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817-338-1700 Metro: 429-9181 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy ,of .the fqregoing Motion for Non-Suit has been mailed this day, Certified Mail; Return Receipt Requested to Rex McEntire, 5024 Broadway, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. =ttcrDey for Defendanr. Dated: January I Z- , 1981. t:7 ~d-- Carter L. Ferguson h .41 .. - ,~ -- e e e . ..... .. .- ., ; ,C,¡~ h 1 ~~: \ :-,~'.. i '.,' r·l .-1- r" "f \.. . -, -~'.. :.- 'j .-.., . ~ J ;J, ¡¡ ~ ~.J ~.:.,. . I d' '"' ..0.. . . foj'Í _Y{¡j~tJi.4.~~~~._[6.1 Jí.~ NO. 236-61903-80 YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN FORT ~vORTH § § § § § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF vs. . TARRANT COUNTYL TEXAS THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS 236TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT N'Oi\J-- Stil'l' On this the /~ day of January, 1981, came on to be heard the Plaintiff, by and through its attorney of record, anà the Plaintiff announced to the Court that it was no longer desirous of prosecuting this action. IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff may take a non-suit in this cause, and that this action be, and it is hereby dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's refiling it at Plaintiff's cost. SIGNED this /3 day , 1981. -~¿ JUDGE PRESIDIt~G .- ~ ,',.,. ..-..-....... >~...-:~._~---~ December 8, 1980 -., - "'-..~ ..__...,,,............,,.,....,,......,,,.,.,,~{ ''; .u.,.,., ,"""""""""""""'"""""",,,,,,,, "",..,.,..~~~_,,( P age 1 2 16. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, _i~~::. to a p pro ve P Z 80- 4 1, 0 r din a n c e No. 861. _ ,."-,,," ,.E ~::-,,,,-'c,.,,..~,z:,,,,,,,~""'''''Þ=z-,-,-Ò R 0 HI A 11 C E FOR { á .__.._~"~:-:-~c~_:...:~-:.;!:~_:I,! .. ~ ,- P Z 80-41 ¡ _ f-10 t ion c a rr.ig,Q..;¡,,,.,Q.,,,,,,;::F,c:,!,,,,,,.,,..-f"':""'''''' :J.:!'--- ORDINANCE t! 0 . 861 I ",,~,,~,~..~,~='--'-". APPROVED ~. .....1\. cðljr!~ltf\TÄrr ~tnr,r.~ 11 Ln-f i~ t' rlüm~·7\~írffts·r'~!frI~ ~'>'lT ~ . ~·Å·..1t 'it"!"'n T i/1Þr r 111m~"- 17. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. t·lr. Beryl Stewart, 409 Fieldstone representin~l Dr. Waggener, appeared before the Council. PUBLIC HEARInG - PZ 80-42, REQUEST OF DR. JAriES t1fAGGEi·lER TO REZONE TRACT 170, AND A PORTION OF TRACT 168, ABSTRACT 1606 FROil IF-7 ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS TO LOCAL RETAIL Mr. Stewart stated they were requesting this rezoning' to construct a medical clinic and ask the Council's approval tílayor Faram asked if this property \~as part of the property involved in litigåtion. f"1r. Ste\vart stated yes, but they \'Jere prepared to sign a convenant on this tract. Mayor Faram stated he would have to question the Council's consideration of this item until the litigation had been resolved. . ~ .. r·lr. t'1cEntire asked t,1r. StevJart if he proposed to agree to the assessment and pull this particular tract out of the 1 a\'1sui t. Mr. Stewart replied that was correct, if possible. Mr. McEntire stated it was possible. Mr. Stewart stated it seemed the Council could go ahead and approve the request subject to the outcome of the 'litigation. t'1r. Stev/art stated the assessment \'Jas going to be there one way or the other. Mr. McEntire stated the Council could pass the ordinance subject'to the delivery of the dismissal of this particular tract, which would not make the ordinance effective until that had been done. Mayor Faram called for anyone .wishing to speak in opposition of this request. There being no one else ~/ishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. j i J . c- .. { 'r. December 8, 1980 Page 13 re I flayor Faram advised the Council would go into executive session with the City Attorney to discuss this pending litigation. EXECUTIVE SESSION r'1ayor Far"'am called the meeting back to ord2r. The same Council and Staff me!nDerS ','¡ere present as recorded at ·the beginning of the meeting with the exception of Councilman Thomas. BACK TO ORDER 18. Councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to approve PZ 80-42, Ordinance No. 862. t'1ayor Faram asked f'1r. Stev.Jart if he \':as the o\'/ner of the property. CONSIDER,L\TION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-42 ORDINAr~CE NO. 862 POSTPO~~ED t1r. Ste~AJart stated no, he represented the O'/lner, Yr1CA \·¡a s the o\..¡ner. Hr. t/1cEntire stated t1r. SteV'Jart had the property under contract without any contingency clause. t·1r. Ste\'Jart stated Dr". Haggener vIas tryi ng to pu}~chase the property. 'I~ t r'1ayor Faram asked t1r. Ste\~Jart if the approva 1 or di sapprova 1 of this request had any bearing on the contract. i1r. Ste\~Jart replied yes. rlayor Faram asked r-1r. Ste\'/ar't if the request vIas not approved would Dr. Waggener not pay for the property. Mr. Stewart replied that was correct. Council man Brady asked t'1r. Ste\'Jart if he \'lere suggest; ng that Yr1CA \¡Jould have to institute a suit for specific performance if the request was not granted. t1r. Stewart replied yes. Mr. Stewart stated this problem came about when he came to City Hall and along with one of the employees, looked at the zoning map., This particular piece of property had Local Retail printed on it, but the oversight was an arrow pointing across the street to another piece of property. t~r. StevJart stated it vIas his incorrect assumpti on that thi s property vIas zoned correctly.' nr. Ste\'!art stated when he applied for a building permit it was denied because the property vIas not zoned correctly.. Councilman Brady asked M)~. Stewart if the zoning were approved, the contract would close and the Doctor would e become the o\·mer. Mr. Stewart replied that was correct. ~ (. e e f i t · e .J- ( Oecernber 8 ~ 1980 Page 14 ( ~. Councilman Brady asked ~·:r. Ste\'¡art if the zoning were approved, would there be any other problems. Hr. Ste\'/ar't repl i ed no" They had been ready to close since August. r1 r. t·1 c E n t ire ask e d ì-1 r. S t e VI art VI hat \'1 ask e e pin g the property from closing from the.standpoint of the contract itself if it was not contingent on the zoning, was the Doctor just not going to come up vIi th the money. ~1r. Stev/art stated the money vIas in eSCi"'O\'I, but the Doctor refused to release the money for closing until the property \·¡as zoned correctly because he was not going to give $59,000.00 for property he could not use. r·1ayor Faram asked t'lr. Ste\vart if he felt a la\'Jsuit would be initiated from the YMCA for nonperformance if the zoning was denied. Mr. Stewart replied yes. Mayor Faram stated that in light of the discussion the Council would go back into executive session vIi th the Ci ty Attorney. Mr. Stewart stated he had looked at another piece of property and it had multi-zoning. They made application for a building permit and could not get one because it had two different zonings. Mayor Faram asked when the contract was signed on the property being requested to be rezoned. Mr. Stewart replied the contract was signed August 4, 1980. Mayor Firam asked if the contract was signed prior to the lawsuit being filed. Mr. Stewart stated he did not know when the lawsuit vIas fi 1 ed. f'i1ayor Faram asked r~r. Ste\¡lart if he vIas made aVJare of the 1 a \'1 sui t . ry1r. Stev/ar"t stated he \,¡as Inade aVJare of the suit aftet~ the contract was signed. .-1... . ( ( December 8, 1980 Page 15 - r ,j ay 0 t" Far" am s tat e d t h 2 Co U n c il\'l 0 U 1 d gob a c kin to executive session \'¡ith the Attorney. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council and Staff members were present as tecorded at the beginning of the meeting with the exception of Councilman Thomas. BACK TO ORDER Councilman Brady' moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to postpone action on PZ 80-42, Ordinance No. 862, until some legal problems involving the property'Vlere resolved. Motion carried 5-0. ---- ..-....... .._!~- -,---,,~......~_...'!..~-,.. .~ -.-~...ò4"............::4. ._'"""!:.;~__~_ .__._. _ . ___~"'...._..____._.~........" _.. ..._.,~-_. 19. t1ayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. ",A ..h¿ ~~ ,'- h POBL ,bHEARING ~~ffO-43 - REQUEST OF ~;A{USSEL t:l. Hi\~'JS TO .~.~~ REZONE TP~CT 38, .;~, ABSTRACT 308, FROr·1 "'i'pY r·1UL TI-FAr,1IL Y TO ,,~;>Y LOCAL RETAIL ~, ,-;::r~ /j-~J;' . ..~>.;/ ..".;,,,1 r1r. Ernest Hedgcoth, consulting engineer, appeared before the Council representing Mr. Haws. - ( I , I , } . Mr. Hedgcoth stated Mr. Haws proposed to build a tVIO story office building on this property. r"'lr. Hedgcoth stated the property vIas currently zoned multi-family and he checked ~ith Mrs. Calvert of the Planning and Zoning Department and she requested the zoning be changed to Local Retail in order to facilitate this building. r··llr. Hedgcoth sho~"ed the Counci 1 a drav¡i ng ~f;-the b u i 1 din 9 . ,.-;...f/ " ;:;)?~/ t/lr. Hedgcoth stated the Jo Beel' s re,štaurant ';las in the southeast corner of the propg)¢ty \'¡hi ch \~Jas 7.8 acres. f!1r". HavIs purchased a 1.2 acre...:jtr"àct on the northeast corner of the property. ,¡,yé"'/'" f-iayor Faram call ed fOf¿*,êÍnyone \vi shi ng to speak in opposition of thi~~~êquest to please come forward. .~...¡..~ There being nf1;~~trne else \'¡ishing to speak, f'layor Faram closed the.J3tiblic hearing. /;;r ,,-,/,' 20. Counçi::lman Hubba rd moved, seconded by Counc-j 1 man Uood, t0vØ:~~prove PZ 80-43, Ordinance No. 863. . . 'fit- .417 ~.øiÞMotion carried 5-0. ~#~ ~ ~.,Jp "~,..."-"... ......,"""'~~=,'-"""""', "", .' ",,'.' ", .,~ v."".-, "U·.'· . ' ., ......,'-"'..,.. .... '. .'~ "... '-. ,..",... ","''C. ',,,,,,,,,,,-oc,,,,,",,"= "·"'·C'=,", "'''.: =. ,." .." "''CO ''='''^. ,..__,.="",_, ,'.. ~.. _ __ .,~ .. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINßJ¡CE FOR PZ 80-43 ORDINAnCE NO. 863 APPROVED "~~J Page 6 P l't Z ~1i nutes November 20, 1980 (... . ,~ ( (·e ~1..fIllt(r¿1f'AI\~if1al I..u·.m ;¡!.. JCI"~..tõiIii~~· (e \ ",-../.,,,,f":?¿' ;rf;7 4/)' ,¿> 1> r'1r. Anagnosti s sa i d thi s is the they have made this request. He were denied the request in 1978. ./" Hr. Anagnostis said he felt it \'/a~fair to not be all o\ved to serve a 1 c9)t>1 i c beverages \'ith their food. He said t~~ no ?ne would be allowed to leave the p~mlses wlth an alcoholic beverage. .;P.pØ" f:1r. Anagnostis sajA~ would only be 5% of the net sales ~Rd he felt they should be a 11 o\~ed to sJ~ll' a 1 cho 1 i c beverages as the others in~the area have. Hé said he had made a ,..,.s;:t~dy of the restaurants in the area that~:-:.hâve been allo\~ed to sell alcoholic b§verages with their food; they are Steak & Ale, ~¿..~~ûo Beels, Dos Gringos, Red Lobster, Bennigans, ~ç~ Dos VecinQs, and Jamie's, not taking into /iþ1' consideration the places that sell beer for ~~~ off-premises consumption. -<J"T ¿:j!>V' .#f1'. ,/.,fØ,1/ ,.::,,(:7 . _..¿ /,/1' ;¡4' ",,1.; - .ð...!tÞ" PZ 80-41 APPROVED i7 V~~..,...'--~ ~,. .e ( The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak regarding this request, the Chairman closed the public hearing. r'1r. BovJen moved, seconded by r,1rs. Nash, to approve PZ 80-41 as requested. Motion carried 3-0.. PZ 80-42 -~- 4...........).4;.. .~-,.::..1......... T·..!='.....~' -"'"""':'"":'~f''''- '''-~--!''''!L-'~- If .- ..-- ..-------.-5IiIii-- -........~,,- -~~~ -. _..=:' !"S" .I"rti-~ ..,....-~-..._... -n ,---~ 'q .--.--..... .-..----- Request of Dr. James Waggener to rezone Trðct 170 and a portion of 168, Abstract 1606, from its present classification of IF-7 to a proposed classification of Local Retail. This property is located on the east side of Davis Blvd., one block south of Emerald Hills Hay. Beryl StevJart came for\\Jard to represent Dr. Waggener and the YMCA in their,request. He said,they v!anted to build a one story, 1600 sq. ft.. doctorts clinic. Mr. Stewart said this piece' of land has a 125 ft. frontage on Davis Blvd. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request to please come forward a ........ t .e -'"~ --~ e / ~, , ¡ '. e Page 7 p & Z ~1i nutes November 20, 1980 PZ 80-42 APPROVED I t .\.... ( Scotty Morrison came forward. He said he represented the VnCA \~/ho i s sell i ng the property. Mr. Morrison said they feel it would be an asset to the area. The Chairman called for anyone else wishing to speak regarding this matter to please come for\~Jardc There being no one else wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. t:1rs. Nash moved, seconded by t1r. BO\\fen, to approve PZ 80-42 as requested& The motion carried 3-0. PZ 80-43 ......,..._..__~...;,_.!!';)._.~~,~~,~~.u~~.""~~~~~.~_"!'P.'!IŒ ~' .(9"'':''/ ;..-:ß" ..~:./ J' ., .;-f'-¥ /" ~? /~" ./ !'I""':;.. .!!:.._ _ ~. ..~~.~.!~'..- - .,..... ;t'Þ,.:; >:..." ....':.-,. :-,':.' .-:., '\ ç;' ; .,;,'~ Request of Russel M. Haws to rezone Tract 38,- Abstract 308, from its present classification of Multi-family to a proposed classificatio ' of Local Retail. - This property is located on the north, de of Ai rport Free\~Jay Frontage Road and a¢oximately 250 ft. south\</9st of the i nterse9i'fon of ~'eyland Drive and the Frontagyoad. Ernest Hedgcoth, consulti~ngineer, came for/lard to represent r'1r",/Ha\4/s in thi s request. He sa i d f:1r. HavIs neeqs;i:~the rezoni ng so he can b u i 1 d a t \'J 0 - s tory ,,~$ìf fie e bu i 1 din 9 · . .;ç#''t. Mr. Hedgcoth ~aïd they are proposing to build a t\~Jo-stor~#professional office building~ but he is no,t,pisure if any of the spaces are 1 eased yet, bJJf the,]' have been talking vJith several la\'Jyers and doctors regarding this. . ...~.,/f- t" ->,f$;-i<f1r. Hedgcoth sai d the bui 1 di ng \\/oul d have /~ steel columns with a rustic appearance similar ./~~ to Jo Beel's. He said it would be approximately J/p!" 20,000 sq. ft. office building \~Jhich vlould have " wood trusses with wood and brick. .of·" .;' ~~-}- ::.. " "';.-~ t1rs. r~ash asked if the site plan shc\,~n here is· the said as the one on the plat. Mr. Hedgcoth said that was only an architectural dt'av/i ng. He sa i d the dra\'Ji ng cuts off too soon, and they \'lould have more flexibilit,y \'/ith \'hat the p 1 at ShO'i/S. r'lr~ Greenfield said he sees other property included in this site plane .' ~:.#'.-~ _:'-~-'- ,":"~'--'.---.--= ,":; - -..-:...... .:. .. _. .:-=~' -::~_.. ':'-':..__-"~: ___"';_--:-:'~~~":""_~'"::_~"~_~~-::__~.~.~--:-'~"_''''~'''''S''-:"''~~:-~'''~~~'._." . _'._.._.' ._ . ~ e e It \, \ , KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas November 11, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-42, IF-7 TO LR We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ,~ P.E. RWA/ljc cc: r~r. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City r'1anager 550 FIRST STATE SANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-621'. METRO/267-3367 fz /!tJ-¢.:L _<0 rf) 0- o' --).. · J 3m ~,. ^ " 1)1 :t () I+'~ j >- \,) ""- . - ~ Zq<l" I~ It · ~ ,1 -.J ~ 5r. ~ " ].. aJ - ~ I ~ Lo-r- ( I I LOT2. I I I l úr~ ~ l. 0 c... k... 2.. /8 ð~ , . '-..) ¿ E: I I I Lo,q I I La. s /-- -- - PL.~ ~ c. "e: 0 t!.c., ~Þ... P IT'N"G. 29 021 S~~- I ,] r~. o~c) c~, a I 01 0.0,8 A~~b5 Lbrr¿ S 89 0 3D'Lù 32{',~ ' . DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED tit BEING a '~ract of land out of the W. W. WALLACE SURVEY, Abstract No. 1606, in the City of North Richland Hil1~, Tarrant County, Texas, and bein0 a pnrt of the same tr~ct of land recorded in Volume 3557, Page 652, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described as follows I BEGINNING at an iron pin situated at the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Emerald Hills, F'irst Section, an ,addition to . the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrarlt County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 38A-39, Page 1, Plat Records. Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 78 deqrees 56 minutes East 320.0 feet to an iron pin for corner being the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 2, Emerald Hills, First Section, an addition to the city of North Richland Hills, T~rrant C~unty, Texas; THENCE South 00 deqrees 07 minutes West 60.0 feet to an iron pin for corner I THENCE South er pin for cornr No. 1938 (r N 1 THENCE ,. 5669.F a'nd - ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN.ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMEN~~ENTS~. SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS) TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HIlLS~ NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS Ai'1ENDEO JANUARY 27., 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RIC~LAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: /t> RESOLVED that òn Case No. PI 80-42 be rezoned from IF-7 Local Retail the followtng descri"bed p~operty sha11 . ". .". .. . . . to BEING a tract of land out of the W. H. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a part of the said tract of land recorded in Volume 3557, Page 652, Deed Records, Tarrant County~ Texas, and being described as follows: -e BEGINNING at an iron pin situated at the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Emerald Hills, First Section, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, . Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-39, Page 1, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 78 degrees 56 minutes East 320.0 feet to an iron pin for corner being the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 2, Emerald Hills, First Sectiori, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes West 60.0 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 30 minutes West 327.39 feet to an iron pin for corner in the Easterly R.O.H. line of F. M. Highway 1938 (Davis Blvd.); THENCE Northerly along curve to the right with a radius of 5669.6 feet a distance of 125.0 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.68 acres of land. e e e e .pOage 2 \ . This property is located· on the east side of Davis Blvd. 2 one block south . of Emera 1 d Hlll sHay. ". '. '. . . APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND. ZONING COMMISSION THIS 20tb DAY ~F . NOVMEBER, 1980. C. . ~ () f~·t" "Þ~?~l} .' ~v" ¡! ,-..:) (: /'.1 ¡ .<./..--.......- ~-<,_) v\ . ?/0. ':c:.I' ._C -,,- .' .~:\ .' ~. . . CHAIRMAN PLANNING AN~ ~ING . C(ØlISSION ~ . ...-. L---:~"1 - .,Þ ...... 6·.:?) (-~~"J' . /) . - ~ ¿jr¡Ç -~ ..... ,..' ---t. _.. -' ... . .-'" .' ¿-: A>-:,'~"/,'.I ~+þt:.-c' . /' . ¡;:,//' ¿';':::..-/'-~.;~f ...--.,. IJ /" . -- - . ~ ---.",,~ SECRETARY PlÄ~ING'AND ZONING COMMISSION . BE IT ORDAINED'BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAHD HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO... PZ 80-42 IS HEREBY REZONED . THIS" . DAY OF 1980. MAYOR DICK FARAH , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND'HIL~S" ATTEST: ' CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE f/100RE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY f\TTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS -- ( I I'. O,l\ TE : 1-20-81 &-f7 e SUBJECT: - PIA 80-44 . Zoning request from Commercial to Commercial-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning BACKGROUND: This was previously Dos Vecinos Restaurant. They were granted the Specific Use for Alcoholic Beverages but when they went out of business, the'zoning went back to "Commercial". This is a ne\' fish restaurant, The Channel Cat Restaurant, and they are requesting to be allowed to sell alcoholic beverages also. The Planning & Zoning Commission approved this request and that it·be non-transferable. tit CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or Denial BUDGETED ITEfvl: YES NO X -- ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ~-----~~--~----~~~-~----~-~-~~~~--~--~-~--~~~-------------~~--~---------~-~~~-- - ...C .f Page 5 P & Z t~1i nutes December 18, 1980 " \ {\ Mr. Owens said it is for fut e expansion \'Jhich \~ill probably be 2-3 .ears off. ·e plan any building. He said that at some later date, if they need to expand> they could have a drainage study done. Mrs. Nash asked Mr. Owens if any plans for the property. Mr. Horvath asked r~r. \~Jens if they would ag.ree to meet; ng wi n the Ci ty Engi neer to come to some reement regarding the dra i nage.. be glad to. e airman called for anyone '/ishing to s ~ak in favor of or in opposition to these requests to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak~ the Chairman closed the public hearing. PS 80-62 APPROVED Mr. Tucker moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-62 subject to the Engineer's comments and subject to satisfying the city Engineer regarding the drainage. This motion carried 4-0. Mr. Tucker moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-63 subject to the Engineer's comments and the resolution of the drainage with the City Engineer. This motion carried 4-0. PZ 80-44 Request of Bill Lightfoot and Doyle Compton (The Channel Cat Restaurant) to rezone a portion of Lot 2~ Block 50, Nor~East Addition, from its present classification of Commercia) to a proposed classification of Commercial- Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located at 5249 Davis Blvd. Bill Lightfoot came forward. He said his restaurant will not be open on Sundays. !.. Mr. Bowen asked if this wasn1t previously' Dos Vecinos Restaurantp Mr. Lightfoot said it was. Page 6 p & Z ~1i nutes December 18, 1980 ( '\ - The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request to please come forward. There bei ng no one \'/i shi'ng to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. PZ 80-44 APPROVED Mr It Ne\'lman moved, seconded by r,1rs. Nash, to approve PZ 80-44 as requested and that it be non-transferable. This motion carried 4-0. PZ 80-45 Request of P. F. Carpenter to rezone a portion of Lot 2, Block A, Reddings Revision, from its present classificati of Agriculture to a proposed classifi of Commercial. This property is located on the rth side . of Main Street, approximately 2 feet east of the intersection of Smit ield Road and f\/1a inS t r e e t . .e ( f\i1r. Delbert Stembrid ., Consulting Engineer, came forward esent Mr. Carpenter in his request. Mr. Stembri ge said Mr. Carperiter has a pro- spective ale of his property for a business. He sai the business would be a welding shop, ete pre-cast and storage. Stembridge said they would remodel the building and bring it up to_city st~ndards. Mrs. Nash asked if they plan to remodel or tear the building down and rebuild. Mr. Stembridge said they would consider this after the sale. He said that if it was not feesable to remodel the building, then they _ would tear it down and build a new building. Mrs. Nash said ~he had noticed where the telephone company had asked for additional easements on each side of the lot. Mr. Stembridge said that was true and they would grant the additional easements. Mr. Tucker asked about the business they' plan to have. e KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL Tr~c ENGINEERS / Fort VVorth-[)allas December 10, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 7ó118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-44 COMM. TO COMM. - S.U. ALCH. - We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. Rt~A/l j c cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager - 550 FIRST STATE BANK SLOG,· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 ,.,.,....,..--- Ie ~ ;1.,'." tf I I I ~ ~¡.: ~~~ ;-" " ~.~ 9 ;;.... $ ~ e t1 i1:'.'.. 11 ~ fj ~ t~ ~ ~.' a TYPE 3" _...AI 111 . Irr p:z f'd -j/~ 1 J. I W llllllr ~ l . ~ ç, 6~oOb' w. - 17.D O' \("\ (\, f "88-$ \'[NCJÞ1Q.i¥ \n ;i ~l's1Qllra" t _~ ~ 4,004 ~~. Ft ~. " vi N. 8~006·E. - 77.D z· FIE L D NOT E S -{j SC¡jLE : 111::- 50 I N i\LL that certain tract or parcel of land being part of Lot 2, Block 50, Nor' East Addition, North Ri.ch1and 11 ills, Tarrant Connty, Te:::as, as recorded in VOIUTIle 388-123, Page 91, Deed Recorcl:~'t Tarrant Count·y, Texas, and being further descrihed by rTletes and boands as [ollu\'Js: BECl~l'¡INC at a point 77.0 feet ~:orth 1 def;ree 18 minutes 35 seconds 'hrest and 104.5 feet North 89 degrees 04 minutes 50 seconds East fr0D the South\vest corner of saiù Lot 2; T1lENCE ~\rorth 89 degrees 06 minutes East 77.0 feet THEi'JCE North 0 dC:'.grees 54 ~linutes \\fcst )2.0 feet; THENCE South ö9 degrees 06 minutes \1est 77.0 feet; rDtE~~C[ South 0 degrees 5/+ G1JnUCl'S Ea:-;t 52.0 feet to thr~~ place pf beginning and containing !-+,004 squace feet of land. Z:;~ e ~ REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR P.o. BOX 1034 268-2211 HURST. TEXAS Date 2-29-30 80-133 I I I ·I~..,.~ c' .~ ~ #1 Ð ~ ~ ~ " .., ., /~/ e· ORDINANCE· NO. þ~ ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS.. . SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE 1179, ZON.ING ORDINANCE OF 'THE ,CITY Of NORTH' R!CHLAHD HILLS·,. TEXAS. - PASSED, APPROVED~ AND ADOPTED' BY THE' P'LAHHING AND ZOHfNG COMMISSION ~~D THE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF NORTH. RiCHLAHD HIlL$, tiOVDI1ER 13, 1967 t AS AMENDED' JANUARY ..27. 1975 . AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTI.CE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING, R£COtKNDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL· OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAHD HILLS BY THE PLAHHING AND ZONING C(M4ISSION~ .. RESOLVED that on Case Ho. PZ '80-'44 the fa110wing described property shal~l,' be rezoned frolli 'CÒmIner'c'ia'l ' , '.' ',' , ' , , .".. , ".' . ': . . . , '::" ··to Commercial-Specific: 'Use-'Sa'l'e: '~'f 'Alc'ollo·lic'· :B'e\Te'r'~' ·e·s· 'arid 'that it 'be' 'ranted to B1 19 toot. & Do-y e Compto'n The Channel Cat Rest'aurant and be non-transferable. ALL that certain tract ûr parcel of land being part of Lot 2, Block 50, Nor' East Addition, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as, recorded in Vol~me 388-123, ·Page 91 Deed Records, Tarrant County, , Texas, and being further described by metes and bounds as fo'llow's: - BEGINNING a~ a point 77.0 feet North 1 degree 18 minutes 35 seconds ~vest and 104~5 feet. North 89 degrees 04 minutes 50 seconds East from the Southwest corner of said Lot 2; THENCE North 89 degrees 06 minutes East 77.0 feet ~ THENCE North 0 degrees 54 minutes West 52.0 feet; THENCE South' 89 'degree,s 06 minutes West 77.0 feet; THENCE South 0 degrees 54 minutes East 52.0 feet to .the place of beginning and containing ~,004 square feet of land: e ,pOage 2 \ . e This prOperty is located. 5249 Davis Blvd. (The Channel Cat Restaurant) . . - APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND, ZONING COMMISSION THIS 18th DAY OF "December .19 sa ¡ "Îi Î . C' - .. (J. t. j ~ /'.'i /,.1 j~ ~.r¿,..k J....' ~ ~j',,-,,,~~,. \...-.;/". ¡". '-' C~I~N P~NNING AND ~ING COl+tISSION ~ . ß;-' . GP e-,' . ' . ~/ ~ . ~ ., ~-- ---~::::? /.i¿. /1 . . '/7 /V?';77 ß-' /'--<..-'2 . ) _ v"( ¿:~2.:;t..--" SECRETARY ~HING AND ZONING COMMISSION , BE IT ORDAINED 'BY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT'Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 80-44 IS HEREBY REZON~D ' Commercial-Specific-Use Sale of Alcoholic Bev~rages THIS' 26 th MY ,OF January , 19 8 !I, , , . MAYOR DICK· FARAH , CITY OF NORTH RICH~~D·HILlS· ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . APPROVED AS TO FO~~ AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS -- e e e "-... \. ( DATE: 1-20-8~ JAC SUBJECT: PZ 80-46 Zoning Request from Commercial to Multi-Family DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning BACKGROUND: The O\vner said he bought this piece of property thinking it was already Multi-Family. There is Multi-Family zoning around it. He wishes to build trip~lexesf., This property is located on the west side of Parchman St., approximately 673 feet north of Grapevine Hwy. The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or Denial BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ---~~~~~--~----~-~----~--~~~~---~-----~~-----~~-~~-~------~~--~------~--~~-~--~ ..---.-'f!~ ... .,...... Page 8 P & Z t/ti nutes December 18, 1980 / \, ( e There elng no one e se Chairman closed the public PZ 80-45 APPROVED Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Tucker to app~ove PZ 80-45 as requested. This motion carried 4-0. PS 80-60 Request of P. F. Carpente~ lor replat of - Lot 2A, Block A, Reddi Revision. Mr. Delbert Stemb "äge, Consulting Engineer, came forward t epresent Mr. Carpenter in his request. lA \. - Mr. St ridge said they had received the Engi er's letter and that they will comply w· n all the Engineer·s comments. He said hey \'1; 11 also grant the addi ti anal ease- ments that \'Jere requested by the telephone company. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to' speak in favor of or in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. Mr. Tucker moved, seconded by Mr. Newman, to approve PS 80-60 subject to the Engineer's comments and to granting the addition31 ease- ments as requested by the telephone company. This motion carried 4-0. PZ 80-46 Request of Billy J. ~Iard to rezone a portion of Lot 6, Calloway Acres Addition, from ·its present classification of Commercial to a proposed classification of Multi-Family. This property is located on the west side of Parchman Street, approximately 673 feet north of Grapevine Highway. Bill Ward came forward. He said he thought this property was zoned Multi-Family when he bought it, but found recently that it was zoned Commercial. f.1r. \,1 a rd sa i d he ha s a buyer, La rry \~ood, \'Jho \vishes to bui-ld triplexes on this property. (e \ ~'1'" Page 9 p & Z r·1i nutes December 18, 1980 ( ì. ( .e \ . Mr. Ward said there was Multi-Family zoning next to this property. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak~ the Chairman clo~ed ·the public hearing. . PZ 80-46 APPROVED Mr. Newman moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PZ 80-46 as requested. This motion carried 4-0. PS 'SO-61 Request of Billy J. Ward for rep1at of Lot 16K, Calloway Acres Addition. Bill Ward came forward. He said he received the Engineerls letter and agrees to all the comments. e The Chairman called for an' ne wishing to speak in favor of or in position to this request to pl ease COI forv/ard. ( \ There being no e vJishing to speak, the Chairman c10 d the public hearing. PS 80-61 APPROVED moved It seconded by f,1r. Ne\'ffila n) to app ve PS 80-61 subject to the Engineer's diments. This motion carried 4-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:20 P. M. CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~y....,..~ ~¥'f'.""r-"""'.,1;--."""""""'~"""~ - f . . \ e .. . \. KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TI~G ENGINEERS,I Fort vVorth-()(111(1s December 10, 1980 Plan"ing & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301'N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-46 COMr·'. TO t·'1. F . We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the C.ity Council. 12L~f ûtL- RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RvlA/ljc cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 ~ . /ý(; w ORDINANCE·NO. AN ,ORDI~~CE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDHENTSt, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179" ZON,ING ORDINANCE OF . THE ,CITY OF NORTH RtCHLAND HILLS·, T~XASJ '. PASSED. APPROVED, AND ADOPTED.. BY THE' PLAHHING AND lONING.COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HORTK RICHLAHD HILLS. NOVDEER 13. 1967» AS AMENDED' JANUARY ,27. 1975 . . . AFTERAPP~RIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC H£ARIHG THE FOLLOWING. RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTK RICHLAND HILLS BY THE . PlAHNING AND ZONING CCM4ISSIOH~ ,. . . RESOL VEO that on Case No. PZ ·80-46. the fo 11 ow1 09 descri bed· property shal1. b~ rezòned from. COIDlI!e'rc tar:: : : : J:: :. .. :. ,: : ~~':-~ ~ ~ :. : : ~ .: : ~ : ~ : .>: ~ , ,·..to Multi-Family' ~ . All that certai~ tract or parcel of land being part of Lot 6, Calloway Acres, , North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 1481, Page 285 Deed ~ecords, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes anq bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the West right-of~way line of Parchman Street, said point being 14.5 feet West and 82.0 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Lot "6 by deed to Gene W. Welborn, et ux, Patsy A. Welborn, as recorded in V'ölume 6127, Page 868, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; , THENCE North 80.0 feet with said West right-of-way "lìne to a point; THENCE West 125.0 feet parallel to the North line of said Lot 6 to a point; THENCE South 80.0 feet to,a point; THENCE East 125.0 feet parallel to the North line of said Lot 6 to the place of beginning and containing 0.230 acre of land. e e e e .pÞage 2 \ . This prOperty is located· on the west side of Parchman St. approximately 673 feet north of Grapevine H~. APPROVED BY THE Pl~~NING AND. ZONING COMMISSION THIS . December .1980. 18 th DAY OF .'"""' If " '~..-.,' (1;, Il if ::- . ,,' ¡:- .' ¡ "'I , , ,;L..,·; (/ " // ,/1 A ,/ l' \ !") J~ .. A 1./.. I / r, ., , Vv . ./~/(J¿;:/lldY~·~U . CHAIRMAN PLANNING AN (JO.KtN., . G C(Øt . ISSIOH , . . \ V" ." . " . A ' ~>---7 '- "/~..~,, -' , '. ~. - / ._-..-J ~J ¡;l /¿:?-'7"/ ¡77--."t€ t:/ J ~:/J ./?<-'" d SEC ARY P~N~~ AND zONtNG C~ISSIÓ~i:--" , BE IT ORDAINED 'BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING 1M REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. ,PZ 80-46 IS HEREBY REZON~D Multi-Family THIS' 26 th DAY OF January ATTEST: ' CITY SECRETARY JÈANETTE triOORE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 19811. MAYOR DICK FARAH _ CITV OF NORTH RICHLANO"HILLS' e e e O,L\ TE : 1-20-81 SUBJECT: PS· 80-61 Replat of Lot 16K, Calloway Acres Addition. This is the same property as in PZ 80-46. DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning BACKGROUND: This property has to be replatted because it is a portion of Lot 6, Calloway Acres. The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to the Engineer's comments. ~ll Engineerl~ comment~ have hepn corre~tpd CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or Denial BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A --~-~--~--~~------------~--~~-----~-----~---~-~----------~~-~------------~~-~-~ {Z~ ft·/···,·;v.~ I' . ...¡# . "",:...~ I Page 9 p & Z f\'li nutes December 18, 1980 ( c.e Mr. Hard said there \'¡as r'lulti-Family ~ zoni ng next to thi s property. ~ PZ 80- c VED PS 80-61 The Chairman called f09ft one \'¡ishing to speak in favor~t-~n opposition to this requ~rease come fon.¡ard. rne;e bei ng no one vIi shi ng to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. Mr. Newman moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PZ 80-46 as requested. This motion carried 4-0. Request of Billy J. Ward for rep1at of Lot 16K, Calloway Acres Addition. Bill Ward came forward. He said he had received the Engineerlsletter and he agrees to all the comments. The Chaiman called for anyone vJishing to speak in favor of or· in opposition to this request to please come forward. (e There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the public hearing. PS 80-61 APPROVED Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Newman, to approve PS 80-61 subject to the Engineer1s comments. This motion carried 4-0. ADJ au RNf'1ENT The meeting adjourned at 8:20 P. M. CHAIRt~AN PLANNING ArlO ZONING COr·1tý1ISSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COr¡lr'1ISSION e It e e KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUl.TI~G E~GINEERS / Fort V\'orth-I)(11Ias December 11, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-823, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CALLOWAY ACRES ADDITION, LOT 16K, PS 80-61, REPLAT We have rèviewed the captioned materials for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Utility companies should be contacted concerning the replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 2. We would request that the proposed zoning (MF) be shown on the replat. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R~IA/ 1 j c cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 D,l\ TE : -0) ff e SUBJECT: . Passage and ratification of passage of Ordinance #836 DEPARTMENT: City Manager BACKGROUND: There has been questions raised about the posting of the agenda when Ordin~nce #836 w~s passed by the Council on August 25, 1980. The passing of this Ordinance must be ratified. The following is the circumstances surrounding this agenda. Our City Council 's agenda is normally published the Thursday prior to the Monday night meeting. In regards to Ordinance #836, the City Attorney did not finish his review of the Ordinance until late Thursday afternoon after the~agenda was typed. This particular Ordinance was added to the agenda at approximately 9':00 a.m., Friday, August 22,1980, and irrmediately placed e on the bulletin board in the City Hall with the typed agenda. The newspapers were also called regarding this addition on Friday morning. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Ratify passage of Ordinance #836 BUDGETED ITEr'1: YES N/A NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A f I ! . I I.." :j:dJ "'-I ¡ J,¡ ------------_____________________________________________________j_{¿~~~C~_£l~~ør; e e ORD I NANCE tJO. 836 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUr¡CIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: Section 1 : The following Departments are created: a. Department of Police Central Services b. Department of Police Criminal Investigation c. Department of Police Uniform Patrol d. Department of Police Administrative Services e. Department of Fire Operation f. Department of Fire Marshall g. Department of Arson Prevention h. Department of General Ad~inistrative Services e i . Department of Off; ce t1anagement j. Department of Financial Planning/Research Section 2: The head of each Department shall be known as Chief of such Department, shall be supervisory personnel and shall be appointed and removed by the Ci ty r·1anager. Section 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after this date, to wit: August 25, 1980 PASSED AND APPROVED ON this 25th day of August, 1980. APPROVED: ~,¡ / "' -f -I,'~¿¿'L l~ ~ ",,/ :MAYOR, City of North Richland Hills, Texas e ATTEST: .,.'.'.--; .>.. f ,/ ,/ / -, /' /'-r;r;:-~ ,/ . ..~-t' .!'.', ..~, .,' ," /" CITY SECRET, RY / / APPROV. ~D[), '1.\S TO FORM AND LEG.~.PTY: ~/I! /(é I " / f i! . 1;/ "'\ r ~ / ) Ci ty Attorney, Rex/ c ntl re . D~L\ TE : ß? e SUBJECT: . Resolution concurring with City of Hurst request reqardinq Precinct Line Road DEPARTMENT: City Manager BACKGROUND: The State Department of Hiqhways and Public Transportation has requested our concurrence with the City of Hurst's Resolution to add Precinct Line Road from S.H. 26 to Watauga, Smithfield Road, and t~atauga Smithfield - Glade Road from Precinct Line Road to S.H. 26 to the Federal Aid Urban System. See attached letters from the City of Hurst and the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. e CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve Resolution BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/ A NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A /1 . . f¡ " I . ¡ - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ -- -- _ _ _ _ _ _ -- -- _ _ _ _ -- __ _ _ _ _ -¿'--;¡ ) LA¿lL0>:: _ '{!/::'Lf~/:.d{ e RESOLUTION NO. e WHEREAS, the City Council has been apprised of the content of a letter dated ~Iovember 19, 1980, from Donald H. Walden, P.E., Supervising Planning Engineer with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation concerning the proposed addition of portions of Precinct Line Road and Watauga Smithfield-Glade Road to the Federal Aid Urban System; and, WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council has recently approved this revision; and, WHEREAS, the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation has requested documentation of this foregoing request by the City of Hurst; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1. That the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation is hereby notified of the City of North Richland Hills· concurrence to add Precinct Line Road from State Highway 26 to Watauga Smithfield Road and Watauga Smithfield-Glade Road from Precinct Line Road to State Highway 26 to the Federal Aid Urban System. e Section 2. That the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause transmission of a copy of this resolution to the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation as \~ell as the City of Hurst. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of January, 1981. Dick Faram, Mayor of City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: Jeanètte Moore, City Secrètary City of North Richland Hills, Texas e Approved as to form and legality: Rex McEntire, City Attorney (,O.____~ '«~f§~~~, :e:.,.(.J ~';.~-/~i!~-.r'::-J i~tft~i~ c:štWaf hurst¡ I _ December 11,1980 Mr. Donald .H. Walden, .P.E. . Supervising Planning Engineer State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Regional Planning Office 2306 Oak Lane, Suite 105 Grand Prairie, Texas 75051 Dear Mr. \~alden: Here is a copy of Resolution Number 771, which was adopted by the Hurst City Council on December 9, 1980. _ Please let me know if you need any.additional information. Sincerely, ~~~ ~;n Proctor City Secretary JP/nc enc 1 . cc: City Manager City of Colleyville /City Manager North Richland Hills I I I I_ I I t I I I I ! i 817/281-6160 t\.·Îetro 498-2700 1505 Preci net Li ne Road Hu rSl, Texas ï6053 e e - Pa¡zsed by a vote of b to ~_ this the ~t:(!- e;n ¿, !' "-1 , 19 ?' l) · 19 q ~ l- n ¡¡ 20 it P -' :. t-1 L f i-t ç "" Ai ::::'; 1... . · ... ~ / 21/ ~t~ #,. /' ~ .'~ 1 2 3 t, 4 ~ . . . L t ~ 5 ¡ 1 : i t ¡ 6 n if n 7 Ii , ! H 8 ! ¡ . .. P 9 II t' tI 10 ; I ; ! Ii 1 ¡ 11 ,I ;¡ 12 1 ¡ 11 ! i ~ I r : 13 ' i ~ ~ : t i J 14 n \i ; i 15 n J ; ; ì , i ~ ; 16 P u j ~ ¡ : : i 17 p 18 1 ¡ ; i I It Ii RESOLUTION NO. 77/ WHEREAS, the City Council has been apprised of the content of a letter dated November 19, 1980, from Donald H.Walden, P.E., Supervising Planning Engineer with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation concerning the proposed addition of portions of Precinct Line Road and Watauga Smithfield-Glade Road to the Federal Aid Urban System; and, WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council has recently approved this revision; and, WHEREAS', the State Department of Highways and Public Transporta- tion has requested documentation of this foregoing request by the City of Hurst; NOW, THEREFORE, '" BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HURST, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation is hereby requested to add Precinct Line R~ad from State Highway 26 to Watauga Smithfield Road and Watauga Smithfield-Glade Road from Precinct Line Road to State Highway 26 to the Federal Aid Urban System. Sec. 2. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause transmission of a copy of this resolution to the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation as well as to the cities of Colleyville and North Richland Hills, together with a letter requesting their concurrence in this matter. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. ~ day of CITY OF HURST .. /\ ¡( J · II (/1 / By: /d.Þ· /~~- Bill Souder, Mayor .. ~À... , -.."\' :~. ~~ ; 22 (.~!: Þ~'Ì'TEST: ~ ~ ' i: ç. ~.'< .' ~ .:~ ..: ~ .. ': : ...-- ~ 23 24 25 26 ¡ ~ , · .. - COt-!iMISS\ON ST ATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGH\\' A YS A~D PUBLIC TRANSPORT A TION REGIONAL PLANNING OFFiCE 2306 Oak Lane, Suite 105 Grand Prairie, Texas 75051 (21 ~/263-1766) ENG \NEER-OI R EC TO R B. L DEBERRY -.- -.- REAGAN HOUSTON. CHAIRMAN DE\\!iTT C. GREE'R CHARLES E, SIMONS November 19, 1980 GT-5-d-2 Honorable William D. Souder Mayor City of Hurst 1515 Precinct Line Road Hurst, Texas 76053 Dear Mayor Souder: In response to a request by the City of Hurst with concurrance from the Cities of Colleyville and North Richland Hills, the Department has ini- tiated action to add Precinct Line Road from S.H. 26 to Watauga Smith- field Road, and Watauga Smithfield-Glade Road from Precinct Line Road to S.H. 26 to the Federal-Aid Urban System. The Regional Transportation Council, RTC, has recently approved the revisions. However, our Austin office advises us that because these cities are not directly represented on the RTC, it is necessary to obtain documentation of this request from each city. Therefore, we have been instructed to request yOU! city to send us a let- ter or resolu~ion, signed by an elected offici2l, ip support of the above revisions. Thank-you for your cooperation. Upon receipt or your letter or resolution, we will resume processing this matter as soon as possible. e Donald . Walàen, P. E. Superv;sing Planning Engineer ~ I I I ¡ DHW/rs cc: City Manager District 2 -, . ..."......... , vv-.)v ...... D,!\TE: January 21, 1981 .,- e SUBJECT: September 30, 1980-Audit Report DEPART~¡1ENT: Finance BACKGROUND: Surol us Breakdown-Ref erto Exhibi t "A" Paqe 7 for Consolidated Fund Balance and to the following exhibits and pages Íor the detail: General Fund- Exhibit US" Page10 utility Fund- Exhibit "C" Page 20 CIP-General- Exhibit !to" Page 29 CIP-utility- Exhibit liE" Page 31 CIP-Streets- Exhibit "Fit Paqe 33 Revenue Sharinq-Exhibit "Gu Paqe 35 Abandoned Auto- Exhibit "H" Paqe 37 e Park & Library-Exhibit "J" Page 41 Traffi'c Safety-Exhibit "K" Page 43 CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Yes BUDGETED ITE~': YES NO. ACCOUNT NUMBER: ? ') I ) , r ¡ / ---------------------------------------------------!i/L~~t~¿1~~~------- e e e e SUBJECT: DEP ,l\RT~1ENT: BACKGROUND: Unemploym~nt- TnSllrðnc-p P1Jt1rl-Exhibi t "L" Page 15 Promotional Fund- Exhibit "M" Page 47 Park Fund- Exhibit- n r~ t1 PctgP 4g G_O... Tni-pr~~t & ~jnkintJ F'11nd-Exhibit "p" Paf~e 52 ~v/S Interest & Sinking Fund--Exhibit "0" Pr1gP S4 CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: BUDGETED I TEt:': YES NO ACCOUNT NU~1BER: DATE: Jri.ntlrl ry /1 ,. . 1981 --~-----------~~--------------~-~------------~----------------~-------------~-- Di~TE: ~ ú-, @ . Foss i1 Creek Park Improvement SUBJECT: e DEP ARTf"lENT: Pa rks & Rect"eat i on As you recall several improvements at Fossil Creek Park were BACKGROUND: discussed Oat the last budget work session. I proposed to construct an adult softball field and due to the traffic congestion and safe~, I proposed to re-route the existing road and enlarge the parking area. The softball diamond will be unlighted and used primar'ily as an adult softball practice field. Preliminary grading has been completed in the parkinq area and a suitable site cleared for the softball field. Estimated cost for this project: 1000 yards of gravel , , TOTAL $8,150. 1 ,675. $9,825. Penta Prime e Chain link fence, infield, dug-out, outfield, backstop $3,622.14 CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: Pa rk Fund ($40,000) .J~.... ," ~ ; II (¿) ! ./ /. <.-./ - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - ~ -'-.!/:~~.::"'- -~ Lv."::::::, /.'1/;1 e .' ~ 0,4 TE: ~~:.') J c~'- ~ù SUBJECT: Resolution all~YJing Nr. Don Lunday to sign checks e DEPA.RTMENT: City Manager/Finance BACKGROUND: I anticipate a change in administrative procedures which w:i·ll require our Finance Director, ~1r. Don Lunday to sign checks. The attached resolution is required by the Northeast National Bank to authenticate his signature. e CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny BUDG ETED I TE~1 : YES N/A NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: NjA -~~--~--~----~~--~~~--~-----~-----~~~~---------~----~--------~~--~~-~--~------- e ~- Resolutions of Corporate Board 1. IJe~ nptte- Monrp , Secret.:ll""Y of e City of North Richland Hills , a corporatton cdy or;~:1ized and eXlstln3 under ò~ hW$ of the St4~~ of T exa s , and doi~g business in North Rich 1 a nd Hi 11 s Tex~. do hereby certiiy that I a.rn keeJ::~: of th~ r:xo:¿5 2..Cd minutes of the procee¿rogs of t..l-¡e Board of Directors of s:1id CO~þOration. and tb.1t on tbe 26th day of_--.J..a.nU a r y . 19~. there \..·as duly and l~gany held a meeting of said Board vt'hich a qUOI'"'LLm of the DirectOrs WJ.S ;>resect and acting throughout. a.nd at said meeting the following resolutions were unacimously of Direccors, at adopted: RESOLVED, That NORTHEAST NATIO:S-AL BA....1\¡"K. Fort Worth, hereiaafter called "Bank", b hereby designaœd as a dcþosirory or this CorÞoration and that an account 0: ~CCO\l!lrs sh.111 be established in beb:lIf of this Corporation witJ.1.¡ Bank under the style of und~r and subject to the rules and reguluions as from time to time prescribed by Bank wherein may be deposited any of the funds of thi$ Cor~r~(ioQ wherher represented by cash. checks, nOtes. or other evidences of debt and from which witbJtawals are hereby authorized in the n3.IDe of the corporation. See Attached list by 2.oy two ( 2 ) (Number of signaUf'6r required) of the following: City Manaer Jeanette Moore - City Secretary Ch~rlp, W Willi;¡ms DictJlaram - Mayor Dave Freeman Mayor Pro Tern Don Lunday - Finance Director IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that any of tJ.~e aoove.named parties shall be authorized to individt13.l1y S!3l1 for and receive the statemen~ and cancelled vocchers of this corporation. or to appoint in writing. agentS to sign for and receive such documents. :1~d any of the above-nami'd p~rties are hereby further authorized to scop paymeats against checks of this corporation and to bind the corpor¿¡tion thereto. Endorsements for deposit may be by written or stamped endorsement of the Corporation without d:signation of the party nuking the endorsement, FURTHER RESOLVED, That any two (2) -of û~e following: (N umbw of signt4t.W81 roquH8d) e Charles W. Williams City Manager Dick Faram - Mayor ,le;¡ nette MooY'P - ri ty Sprrpt;¡ ry 'Don Lunday - Finance Director may from time to time borrow mOilf:Y in the name of th~ Corpor:ltion from the Bank and give the Corporat:on's notes or other e~:i¿ecv.:es of i~1dcbted.. QC$S therefor. in such amounts and for such time and r3.te of incen..'St ~ may be desi,;n:\ted on s~id notes or other evidences of indç~redness or a3 may be the Bank's CUStOm. and any of said þe!"Sons m~y secure the payment of any or all indebtedness and obligations of the Corpor;l£io3 to 1:~:lnk by the ex;:,. curion and delivery for and on behili of the Corporation of deeds of trust, assignments, ch3.ttel mortgages. separ~te colh.tcral agt(;,~menr5, p!cdge ~yee- meûts, I03.G agreements, and other security ag.r~eml~nts, as w~ll as any other ;".brct:m~m that m;1j~ be required by the Bank, 'whether similar to :!.ny of tho~e enwner.:::red or not. which said :'..greementS or instruments nuy, among other thin;:), pledge, encumber. convey, or cover any or :111 prop¿.rties of t.he Corpo!"atÏon, including bills, nOtes. 2.Ccounts receivable, stocks, bonds, rea.l estate and personal property, as well as any other property and asser.s of th~ Corporation, whether simib.r to those enum~rat~ or not, and the notes, bills, accounts, certificates of d~posit, anò ocher receivables acd iüs~nL'11~nts owned by said Corporation may be transferred to s3.id Da.nk for rediscou.nt or for pl~rchase or for collection 03 tIle endorsem~nt of any of said .penons; and any of said þerson3 shall have authorÜy to wÛve demand, prOtest. and notice of prot~t or dishonor of any check, nOte, bIll. dIaic, or other instr..uneat made, drawn, or endorsed by this Corporation. FURTHER RESOLVED, That Ban..~ is hereby authorized to honor any and all withdrawals of the Corporation's fU:1ds payable to the officçr or agent signing, or countersigning the sam~, or par~ble to Bank, whether such withdrawals a:e presented for c:Dh or for credi: to the pt:rsoH:il aCCOU!H of such officer or agent or the person presenting the same, a.Gd B.l:1k need nuke co inquiry concerning any such !tem. FLIR THER RESOLVED, Th;iC the Secr~:lr:: or any Assistant Secret~y shall certify to B.1Ilk the names of the p!'es~!}tly duly f:h::c(~d a£1d qu31ifying offic~rs of this Corporation as well as the persons authorized hereunder. and shall from time (Q time herdcer. as changes in the pers!)::!üéÌ of said officers or th~ persons authorized hereunder are m:lde, i.m....rnediacely certify in writing s~ch chan.;es to Bank, and Bank shall be fully protccted ia. relying on :",:lch written certificltions of the Secrc:ary and sh~l Lx: i£1Jemniiied and saved h.l.rmless from any claims, demands, o:!-~!l5es. losses, ür da.m~g\~ r(;sultlog from or growing ouc of honoring the signature of anj; persons so certified or refusing to honor any signature not 50 certified. FURTI-I.EH.. RESOLVED, The said au=horiry herein conferred shall remain in force until \vr!ttcn notice of r-:vocacioa thereof shall be rcc~ived by said B~.8.k or a new resolution superseding the pr~eD.C one. FURTHER RESOLVED, That these resolutions and the authority herein gr:lGced sh:1.l1 þJ.SS and inure to any 5l:CCfSSOr or to the a:'~igi1s cf Bank, I further ceItify that the foUowing are the names and the tIU~ and official sign::UUIts of the pre$ent officers of this Corpor::uion and the persOIH authorized to sign for and on belulf of this Corp.:>ration ia the foregoing resolutions, Dave Freema.rL=--Mayor pro Tem Presidt;'nt '1:;sista'lt SeCTf);,.J.1'Y V ico P(OjidlffJ /"lHist~'u Tr¡J.:liurer· e çecr8tcW'J (SEAL) T reaJu.,er L.~ WI1NESS W'HEREOF. I have hereunto Set my hJ.nd as Secretary of said Corporation. and h:1Ve au:ached hereco the offici:ù seal of said Corpo- ration, thi3 cIa y of 19_, FORM 31 S ecrUlar'1 e e e -. DATE: ~ ~ SUBJECT: Check Protector - Check Signer DEPARTMENT: Finance Department BACKGROUND: Cost: Check Protector $850.00 950.00 $1,800.00 Check Si gner TOTAL See attached material for additional information. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny transfer of funds BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO. X ACCOUNT NUf1BER: Reserve for Contingencies 1-120 10-15 · (J {} . ------------------------------------------------~~~-~!~~~----------.- rT v ò/' e e e City of JXðrth Rich1and Hills, Texas ! ~\ -~~¥--~ ;:~'" ~ ,:.<::~ \ \ :' TO: Chuck Williams, City Manager DATE: December 17,1980 FROM: Don Lunday, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Check Protector/Signer Per your instructions, I have investigated the cost to obtain a check protector/signer for the City. The best equipment, in my opinion, currently available is a Hedman 2300 distributed by F & E Check Protector Co. at a cost of $1800.00. This price includes the check protector, a signer and one signature plate. The signature plate can be made with either one or two signatures. The machines have as security features the following: 1) The check protector and the signer can be separated and used in two operations or locations. 2) Locks (all with different keys) a) Check protector lockinq protecting operation. b) Check signer locking signing operation. c) Check signer locking a trip switch on electric current. d) Check signer locking compartments containing removable signature plate. 3) Check protector can be used without the signing operation. 4) Check signing can be done without the protecting operation. 5) Check signer has an enclosed, non~resettable counter. The delivery time on equipment and siqnature plate is approximately one (1) "leek. Due to the time currently being used to protect and manually sign with two (2) signatures approximately 16,000 checks per year, I offer the following recommendation: Purchase of this equipment with one (1) signature place, containing two (2) signatures. mr 1/1:- . .'/" J ( /~/ k~~ :~'£-T~~.J Don Lunday, Direct~Fînance (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / p, O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 ..,...~ ,'/ e e e City of JXðrth Richland Hills, Texas ; I ~ -,~~*~"- TO: t Cl1l1C}:: T;filliams, Cit~r ~ylanager DATE: January 7, 1981 FR01"I: Don Llh"1da.y, Director of Finance SUBJ~CT: Check Protector/Signer In repl'Y to Y01~!, C'tlestions conce:,:-:ing ~l recorn:nendations on Durchase of a C hOC"K Drotoc~ or IS": '-·nor I O....~ fol"" t h~ .:" :'}'10" T~ Y\-. .d...., t v v .1.1.. b ~ . '-' .1 ..... v - n·'>.J._ '", -L N ...L.. ~ .J.ö . 1) u:Jha.t i~3~;""Oltf" recof!1:11en(iation as to its use age? " r·1jr reco:nrnendation is to Drotect and sign "t¡ia signature plate or olates all checks written by the Cit¡. 2) "l~here kept." Because the Hedm~~ 2300 is in f~ct tHO (2) machines the signer c~~ be seperated from the protector anà o?erated a3 t~,;o (2) units, ~·:ith the trrotector being kept in the finance department and t.he signer in the CitI S8cretar:r's office 1L.'îder lock ar~d ke~r. 3) tf~'Jhere ,-¡ill the signature plates be ke~t?" ~hen the signer is not in use the sign?turc plates would be removed for~~he signer and kept under locl{ 07 someOr1.2 t··¡ithout aCC8SS to the signer. 4) ''1'Iho is in control?" C}18cl{ signing control is '¡ested in :nanage~Tìent, the same as no~/'¡. The Finance Departrnent \·¡ould T/;ri~e and -orot-ect all checks. The.:! 'Nol.l1d the!1 be delivered to the Cit~¡ Secretary, ·;:·!ith Su?po:rtin~3 data to be ins,?ected b~r her and the r'la~Tor or Cit ~,.r ~!Ianage r. ~~¡hen r12.nage::1ent has inspected tl1-8 C hec ~:s and Sll?Dorting data and checks are readi to be signed the sj_gner is activated, checl~:3 arc sigr:ed tÌ18n delivered to the Finar;.ce J~;.?~rt::-:e::.t for maili!1g. 5) "The t.f.:~F3· sa-ved usin.g this mac}line?" Tile time spent 'JY1ier Q1..1r c urrent s~/sts:n to -:)::.~o :-"sct.J and rr.an11all;r slgn VJith t :·'10 (2) ~.; (1' ~ ...,.¡- 'U1""~~ c '".) -n~ro~·"·~ r":"t" ~ e l~ r 1 6 (~n" r- '''1 I:) C 1"r.-. ~ -..,..,.~:'o a~ am· 0.., Y'lt S + 0 .r"bO'!1+ \ 0-,-(.:;'~"';"'''V ....-...-\...I ~":-,....í...· ......:..:tc..v ,)' ....i.. "j....r_l 1".;t.",,-, ....0_~.....··......._.L Cd :~.£. \. .... ,::... \..À.V L'..7,. (),. hryp~,:::" "';'V"I'0~1~11 'r 'f1"; ï1i~ S·....."ri"ðrl c-h(ìl1l ri ÇJr~"'1""L O~. _,~ h~l.p (\,) Of' th~ + ~~t:\ . ,. _......,~.I..:..... ...........~..........~'--'-_.j. 1. ~...-... '-'-...·'Ju ~;c~J·_....L-,.A ""'., J.U. .l._ 1..·.;. ..... \' ._ ... e .......J....d'>.J current17 socnt, or 235 hours annual17. /ì sp . '~I ,¿; ; -- of .. ~·!{1~ 9~:,~··;_,·~~~lß-f' ... .-~"-:;,. ~ '-' éL .. ..L..lnU.'~;' D l ~ '~!í(;-or 0 ~ .0 l. .au'-- ~ ../ (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E, LOOP 820 I p, O. BOX 13385 NORTH R!CHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 75118 \ê' <i.;{~;·Royal ...... .... .... ÇOmp~nlOnS.. .;. Combination Check Protection System. Twounitsin op~. Doubly effective. ,~- ~, . ,'" ./.."., . , .. , . ~ . ' , <:>: ::~~;:. '~~~" ~ . :..~:~ ..- '..,,,,' . .~. ,~./: >-~ ...- ...: , . : ":,'-.~~;; .'~. ,.. ~ '~:-'::~":'~".;~,~" ',">{ ,·7""L,i . ......... ~<~ .;:. 'Y ':">~~~;:i .~,,':. C' . '. '" ',,1113 J . i,.Xi-";;i~;~'h'-;'L·~ "/~' ~jr~I' ß.·' >,;:~;~i . t ':i i .~,,~,:~~il.,~:~~~S. ...·,:~:~è· " '_'." ~~~r~iBltI~i~I', t: ;'~::4:,~:;'i";}0;,: . , :':. , .·t;·· ~:¿""~ . +~i:~;!'.·'·' '~'. ,0 "'<.~/~:?;.;'\'\':,:;,> ';~~:': :¿. . ~'<":~i '. ·.,i<" . '·;;E,·,': .,;;; , ;.,,', "P ", ~Þii~li..~~·~} . .,. fr',,'j".;~)¢·?¡,,,,>· ': k~i(:~ ..",',;.:.< "':''''~''''.\'..'.o. " Ii:. ,:.:... ..,~::.;.,:.:'j:'.!~:". ~".' . ':.,·::;X\:·,;.' .;. .: $':':~/" ,':';" ..... ;.,;,.'..:~ . '.; .'~ . ..:.:....;' :,;::t·;"\~'<·,·2; .' '.C{ 5<:it:1~~::',.~-Ä~'~;;"j' . ..;.;}:~¡, 6) ,'it:;., ", "'::,\~:'",:o';'$\.i;~,,' ~.£:..", ~. '>5-'; ,>,.),i.,~ 'L, ';'(":<\~/¡>,":, ., 'f~ >~ ;,~:r:'~:f;:':":. .:..:" . ,', }:' ;~~?~::< :7; :¡~. ;,':"'~f';,:/',: :~ {s :',:-:;,.' .'·'~;·;?r J·.,i,,' . >'>.F;- -.' ;c:' "", ,:'" .' ':;}';'i;:;~ t~,"L' ':"'0'" <,c.", ~ ' :'::"/"~:·.z~F;<;;5, .. '" e Prints the amount with pinhole perforations. Custom Name Die personalizes and prevents alterations.: ,ndel ible ink impregnates paper fibers. C'. , :;~):'< ,,;; '<}~"';.~':>v, "'·'d. '" "~>.",:<~,,,~~;ç.,?,,'.,; "·~t¿ , ",': "·Lic .'~', . < : ",:::)?~",~;.. ",J(:"J<; ,'~.... . ". ." «'~';'.':;'. .'. . . ",. . , ../..:: ~.:-1- .1r~"!t~'1$:> ~._ :,1 ,'4' -'·1'''·' __ ..' ..,' ·Y'-. ....... ,,-k""~;;;'''''i,:'' "...; :....... ,'" '. ..~.., , v. .. , .,,·.\a;HEDM~N .,:. $ . . C~ " .. . :",: ~~,~~:·.:i':;~:l'· ~;~. . . (~:'h~;/·~;'-. - è . .. .;~':' >,~ :.:~v:.:t;;.· ·'~t:;). .' :'>'>'~.: :'i';'!: ,):;:;'*f;"\, :,.~; . :~'i,ë~~' .:~", ". :'.'..,. '..;~, , , ,~,~,:' .,..: '. ,':' '~:2:,';"¿· . . '::.1;~· . '<'~:" ¡,i"::,~\;;::t 'c i'::;}', 'IT¿:{;,,'',/ .... .... ')¡,~:"," . .:" ^ .;:;' ~¡:¡'".~.< .>r·'·;~:>',::·"·i{ ;.. , ,:<Y.::,~: . >. .;'2,'(').. '>, ......>"... '.:: ...... 0':. '''. .p/.... ,',: . , ...:. .,.,', ';'. Wit:·::1':'.,,:',,o.. < "".~Þ.it . ..;:; ~t¡: ';:-~ii~è11 ·Di~ti¡·:.·>: \;"?:-":~?'<"¡~~:,;,.., ~~~i~~ ) ~'F'}~·'.';;':;., . ""'-~~~~'i"'~F . "1;"i,,::,,"(",tP, "'.:':- ~.t ~;' ..~ .... ~',>}~:; :::~ '. , . ".'i':t~ ;r: 9 -... ~.... --..~ 7 J;~ i<.; ~;I J-::Z \' . :::i~;~:1 ~ :' \ "'" \~. '. ,':"", '~;/(t,1;) .,.-'.,·;t··#.,...·.;.;\ ' ' ~ . ,'..; !"." '=~;"1~~~!¿:' l;'·' ':::;;-'~'~(;~Ä: "''';Af" ~.~ ~Wèr"'/""'" ,;é,;;::;/ ,; ~, :."......,... ..:.~,;;~~~~;,,;:,:'y ~'\ ~~.t4' : >;(~" :~,~È~ª~~t;~,;\f':..I' , " {~~~ :f.". ./'<,"".. . . . ";"'¡;<, ,,' '::~:< >; 7-/:Lt\,' '\. ~_......-_~ .:;;::,~~ . ".', /'.' >: 1t }~;,;: ~2",..;:..·.., " "::~;:'>':....."'; :.:f~ .'" ~'. . . -~-. ,".;';:' " ~ ..,>-.," ex· ,,~, ~.<{:;..~:.~:::'~t .tf;~.,. <' " ··~'L' ····(·;2&{~L..,. :¡i;~1l~~I~I~';· " ~~'."';"". .,-. .. >; >.,. :; .. :;;",' " ~ ',.,,,, . '. c. '~?~"";(,,,:: }':'~:;"':~ :Z;;;;""':\ ~'~:'i::. . \ '. .'.,...,..,.. ¡;:~,t.'.. "g;.c, "~ .. .. ..; . 'f ii;;\~<,',...:;:··~ .- ~ ."~,;'i.;j~;' ;tf' :'- I" ' . Dates checks .. !~ .. . .- -- . , ~ ;b.' and aU copies 'j ~l ~F HEDIV1AN ~o, ~ ~Signschecks ~i F" & £ c....E:C'" ¡;>F>ore:-';TOR ÇH~C>< $IONI NO ,..."C....'NCS -'æ / .'. with forgery.. .,~ a, ® A."-"'1··WH l-: In: , JAN 1 4 1934 1/1'. __ ~;, ' proof plates , .. , ~. ; Counts checks 4 fi PAY TO THE ORDn~ 0 ---- S k; WIth totat accuracy [j --=.~==., ~~~j; .;~~~:~+.? ~.?>~~!'[~~§ 7'~'~' 0, :;:~<~J ~ r. DEMONSTRATION CHECK ' 0, &7. /!?ðJ/,/;'!?5: ~1 l, NOT VALID .!~ ~& ..,~ "-- .. I:OOOQ·"OOOOI:. 2'" 3 L, 5'" Þ ?U" ~OT ~""EGO'T'T""HLE ~'.. N"~ ..J.~ ..&:...~~:,.= . -.. .... . .~;"~,;~ .., ,;,;,..:. ;;~:::.,,~:., ... ..,~. , j /S. ~\ \:.. \~. \ \ ," ,.,: . >,. ..... <¡,.: '{ ': .. '"'~~''' ~."'. "'. ,.' , ", ',\ »":;.,..::;'" .', .:~:.:." '" :~;. :':~~.:., .,".>. ..: .' . > ; :r .~" . 9 9 Ii- :.. ,- ß 'L·. " ï -, -;. :. ~ €. €> :. S ~ . -. A ð,. - A. '3 '3 "3 >~. '2. L '2. ", '\ '\ "\ ,.'", '\ '\ .,.. c/.~ 'f"'~ ~~ ~ ..\~ '\:. " - . ., ~ .~ ~:;;...- ~ ~. .c-- , ' ,,\~ .' ',~,~ ~~~è=~';;< c. .·:"~i":·:i ,.Z't'i7r.~d'~ /,,;'~" .... ,~:};;;?;,,:;!~';<'.~..:' .:,::;;~i·~C·" ~;-,. - ,.,..~:';i,::;fj:,.;.~;. .. ":.~:j~~f~~~~1'il~~II. ::;, ":,<,,,:.o>s1·~2!-~~·~"l~rJI ··}3'~~:·(i,;.",:;,.<.' . .':.~::~::'.':'c';%:~1~~F . ,·t,,,"'~':;<:.' . . . .,<'(" .' /, ~~II-\:I~.,:. :'. c' . ;",' "':'. , '. " . ";~,, . . , . , , ....~.,: .,;>,;;~~,~,; ¡).,;;~~~~~/';~~~~:¥~;<.. ,...,'" <:'~';"~r"~ ..'.:':f. ~"~h:' _ ;,~. :~-",¡>",. , ·::~~;:{:ii~;:·~:, ':. ",·:;,Ä: '~~ :.~~. _ ': " .. ,'. :<~:';;~~~;&:,\~f\ .....j".;.¡,-;:",,/ ':'; "-', Voucher Hand Pr~ For continuous fo' and checks with \.: attached on top c Imprints protectE' up to $1 a.GOOCOl :Joard entries and ~ operation. Security I, ~;,.~~~~~~~~~-, No, ___ ~~ :.1 H1 .\XY\\'IIEHE,______l9 ~1 -~.;! r: S--~1 ;-." ~~ ¡,i '.-j ): t:S:-.;7~T~¡..:(;.~(1TL~1.=tLE-- ~~ :':'~~~.~~~~~~L~~..~..::~~~~ Together, they're doubly effective. . Hedman guarantees it! \:d . !:ie~e ~~O~H<CK .-0...0 ---. 'r"? .. r + ':.;' . ~Q.....- ~ ~ ...~ -- ......¡,~o(::.o :. ;;:,..- >:".c...r.0.... ..::..._-. ;)£·-./..¡......5 $20,000 Check Protector Warranty-against losses due to forgery or check alterations. . $20,000 Check Signerl Dater Warranty-against losses due to counterfeit- ing of signature imprints. See the back of the ," : left-hand flap for further . - information on these "outstanding" Hedman·'·.:,:.·,·. ,;' .-. \"Iarranties, > . r-- r I 'Hedman Royal Companions I Combination Check Protection System j Speeds up check processing and ¡ .fles check fraud-automatically t Red Warning Light Glo\vs when n1achine is "ON:' Reminder to lock units when unattended. Automatic "Repeat" Repeats recurring sums. Speeds processing of money orders, payroll checks, dividend checks, etc. Locked-in Security 4 key-locks wardoff tampering. Register book provided for audit control of all check disbursements, Check Positioning Guide Adjusts easily so amount can be imprinted in the proper location on most any check, Custom Name Die Preceeds check amounts. Personalizes checks and prevents amount changes. Exclusive Ink Cartridge. No costly, cumbersome, out-moded ribbons to replace Re-inks in no time, with no fuss. -...~,,4""~.._,,~,,,,,,, Sealed Meter Counts "signed" checks only, Provides positive audit contra!. Rotary Date Wheels Locked in, Imprints the month, date, and year. Wheels index in either direction. Snap-in Signature Plate With single or multiple signatures. Locks in. Snaps out for safekeeping. Exclusive Re-Ink System Locked in signature plate and dater can be re-inked easily, through unique slide-open inking door. Automatic Operation Checks are signed, dated, ejected, and sequentially stacked in receiving tray. ... .- Overload Lock Micrometer check- thickness setting. Unit stops and automatically locks checks in signer if more than one check is inserted. Automatic "Void" When multiple-form checks are processed, the signa- ture on the duplicates is automatically voided. ~--,-",-_.-_......,_.._- -_._~_...__._..__._-------_.--"-----,-......,~~ ._~ .._..".._...-_._---..--.-..._-_..._-~--_.-,.. Special Options for Special Situations Sliding Carriage For quick repositioning o.f the amount and signature imprints when two or more styles of checks are used. "Warranted" Perforator Special die stanlps "VVarranted" through payee's name with pin hole perforations. Stymies attempts to alter or change the name. On/Off Signature Control Ideal for banks requiring signatures for certain checks and not for others. Meter counts only when signature plate is engaged. D8ter prints in both modes. ~"..' ,..........._--.....--~_...._~~...,-...., High Speed Tripping Shelf For rapid signing when Check Protector is not used. As check is placed in position on the shelf, slight hand pressure trips a sensitive switch to activate the Signer/Dater Split Signature Plate Allo\vs two or more persons to retain their separate portions of a sp!it- engraved signature plate, Memo Amount Macerator A Hedman exclusive I Replaces the "Dating" function, Perforates through the ¡'doliar memo amount:' Stifles alterations. Ideal protection for cornputer-ç;enerated checks where the Dater is not required. . ,,..,_..__...,.. ~__.. ,_~........",___..._____·.~______.r~·___·.''''''''__'''''··'Þ__·'''·.__'''''··''~ ... .,.... ____.........._~..,'" ~E HEDMAN COMPANY 1158 W. Armitage Avenue Chicago, I jjnois 60614 (312) 871-6500 Prj~!pd !n U.S.A Form No ì04R Authorized Sales and Service in all principa/,U.S. cities and worldv·//de,