The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1981-02-23 Agendas T DATE: 2-18-81 SUBJECT: Perma-Steel Construction DEPARTMENT: City Manager BACKGROUND: As discussed in Council work session on Feb. 2. and Council meeting of Feb. 9, Mr. Bob Ash needs decision if he-may proceed with construction of Single-family and Multi-family homes using unique construction methods which were briefed to the Council. As instructed by the Council, 16 property owners were notified in writing of Mr. Ash's intent to vary from the Brick Ordinance (attached) and construct Multi-family dwellings in the College Hills Addition. In addition 4 citizens were personally visited by the city staff for their comments. The following is (summary of their comments: Mr. Wade, Fort Worth Christian - had nonnative comments. Mrs. Perkins, No negative comments - do not necessarily want apartments but had no obejctions to this particular type - ratherlik'ed this design. (OVER) CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny permission to construct homes using derma-steel construction. s BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO _ ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A _ FEBRUARY 23, 1981 COUNCIL MEETING Forum Insurance Company e Executive Offices: <9 140 South State Street, Chicago, lllino~· 6Osq,r' Q.- Telephone (312) 621-6000 ' I) ~~. February 9, 1981 V'j ( M. E. Riddle - City Mgr. Ci ty of No. Richard Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 No. Richland, TX 76118 RE: Claim No: 71CP-26 ~~:~::~ : ~~ITl~~=O i. R~:;and s ~ ~V'\. Pol1cyNo: v-a Dear ::~::d::~~tible: ~~ The above capit¡oned matter has been concluded. Pursuant to the terms of the policy contract issued to you by the Forum Insurance Company, we are at this time requesting payment in the amount of $1,000.00. e This figure represents the amount incurred for the defense of this claim. Since this expense payment falls within the limit of 'your deductible, we are requesting reimbursement of the entire amount paid out. We have enclosed an photostatic copy of the draft to verify our expenditure. Please issue yout 'draft payable to Forum Insurance Company in the amount of $1,000.00 at your earliest convenience. For your convenience we are enclosing a stamped self addressed envelope. In the event any future correspondence with this office is required, please make reference to our post office box number, P.O. Box 87439. Trusting, we will hear from you in" the near future, 1M remain Very truly yours ~ ". . /7A1 V Barbara Gerbe Claim Department e Encloaure ~ 0·. ! I [ I ( I r· .. r . ... t. .. I~à f·..: 1 c¡ r g f ~. { ::. . I I ( [ I I ( r r P Î :Þai I il r :!!~ .. r-4 .. ; . nI· - T' .' I aJrl . '\t· I ~ \ :' I -.j f r I t I I I I I I ¡ I J . ··'1 Ct' ~ .1 ~ l [ ( . l J. r Ia t, z ~.. (~. 3~' . ~.~;. J' ·1~" [.. ..: .. .1- ,. ." .._ t' ·f .:~.:..< :" ..... :. ~,...,>. . . f~~5¿Ff ~ ... J;:~,?' gi If~~"}~~' ~ .t .:.' .....": -- ~~a . 0 :;a __ z c: .. -t ¡ ~ ~ a.. 0- ~z ,.,,"" ~c: 5"-<~ ~ ~ z . » n Q.~m en -0 23: "'-0 c:> ~z >-( z n m 8 ~ ." > Z. ,'" .~. .,.,. . ...... - ...... ~."c: 0..0-0 .~ 0 "õz 9.:;.» .. R, . m' -0 -t > Z n ·m . ...... . , ! 8 :,. i I!~.. ~Jtr:,:, ~ þ.... ;! lot -, ~. i ... .- I:: Sf' · i I ,.. ..' . .... Dt . . .-J '" " _ Cft!J !~ if "91 ~.~.~?' ~;t 5 . ..!!I .~ .0:' ~ .1 · Z n-S ¡ 0 !J .. ~ ::t )Þ . ~ ~ ... n ,-- , 0 ....., CD ........, CD {.J19 .,.. .,:,... ,<. . .> ~. , .... ~;... : ,.,. =! , O=UI . ~~n at cn~~ ... ~,..i 0 ·0 .. 0"0 w ~~~ . o-<~ ... ~~-4 W "'3~ ~~~ ",-" c~ "'-at az,., ,..,,~ ....- - .... _.~....----- - _/ "';...._! .,...~ ",_."_d .. ~ .. . . . . . I I I t t , , ~---,--...--~.... -- :--.-""'""--..-- ------:-~-_...........--. - City of 5Xõrth Richland Hills, Texas TO: Chuck ~~i 11 i ams, City Manager DATE: February 19, 1981 FROM: Dennis Horvath, Asst. City Manager REF: AC~1M-0005-8l SUBJECT: Right-af-Way Acquisition from Alan Hamm On February 18th, I had a long discussion with Alan Hamm regarding the acquisition of right-of-way along Rufe Snow Drive. He was very upset at our assessment policy and specifically our assessment for the off- site storm drainage along Buenos Aires. He was very negative regarding any assessment by the City. e At this time he has hired an engineering firm, I assume to propose an alternate drainage system from the KEF proposal. His lawsuit on Davis Blvd. along with his general dissatisfaction with the Rufe Snow project will certainly delay indefinitely the acquisition of alJ the ROW needed for Phase I of the Rufe Snow project. He will not negotiate any ROW offer until his drainage assessment problems are resolved. As a general update, I have signed contracts from E-Systems, Roger Brooks, and Cary Vollentine and have commitments from TESCO and Clark Brothers (Jess Prideaux's property - 75% of needed ROW). I have some problems with Donald Kerr, Crossroads and Alan Hanm. At this time, Alan Hamn seemingly is the major roadblock. I believe we should f)robably discuss this with the Mayor and Rex. tit (817) 281'0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118 £barlts 18. Eøms _ iurgR.ùnb JamES R. t1.u Ritk ù£ fBing1zr Euans, t£arh & &œs flthmttys at taw Suin 100 729 Itdføm-Eulus Raad 1B!St flurst, ¡£us 16058 (311) 263-1511 (817) 282-9311 February 9, 1981 Mr. Chuck Williams, City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Drainage Assessments Dear Chuck: This is· in response to your question regarding whether the City may assess property for drainage improvements. e The authority of a city to make assessments against property is governed by State statute. The only statute which deals with drainage assessments is Article llOSB, V.A.C.S., Section l(a). A copy of such Section is attached. As you can see, such statute authorizes assess- nlents for "drains and culverts" if they are "appurtenant and incidental'! to improvement, of a street or curbs or gutters. There appears to be no court cases which have interpreted to what ex- tent a drain or culvert may be "appurtenant anà incidental" to a particular street improvement. This would be a factual determination to be made in each individual case. At the very least, it would appear that the drainage work must be at the same time and in conjunction with street improvèment. 4t i$ evident that doing drainage work separate and apart from a strèet improvement would not allow property to be assessed for SUCh'\&lOrk. Should you rieed anything further, please do not 'hesitate to call me. Sincerely, -LA Terr~~eaCh TRL:tz Enclosure e ~~~~--;-- --'~"-.-'--r-~""-:--:--'--'~..~-~------~~'--"'" -"'-'-~.-~--:-;-----:--.....-----..---....-.'7'-~--'-- ~ Art. 110Sa .H~...~~.~ .....-- .-4 . . . ¡ .... . - .. .":! . .... '. . '.' : .; õt'. ,.. '.; -'''2',.' '.. . ".. ''':::; ..~.C~. . ..:.. . "._",..'r~. ß-~.. __~_~~.................. '. ....:s;ø.r,~ L - ..- ~. . CITIES, TOWNS AND VILLAGES Tit. 28 remove all structures and to condemn any property then within such line, and to assess benefits against property owners and their property benefited thereby, provided, however, that all owners of property so affected shall receive due notice and hearing in the manner then pro- vided by law in the determination of the additional damages then sus- tained by the removal of such structures or the taking of land. then within the building line and in the determination of benefits to be as- sessed against property owners affected and their property affected. \"'" .~~.¡ .~ ~. ìl. ....,. .... . . . I.. .. ' If:r f.~~..:, ...~..:-..' 'r;~: . :~,·:·f ~'t-'':'~-~; Act .. cumu]atlye See. 6. This Act shall be in addition to arid cumulative of any powers now or hereafter conferred by law on such cities. Acts 1927, 40th Leg., p. 415, ch. 276. . .... .r DeeUIo.. ...:..:. :" ~ Library ...f....nce. Eminent Domain ~1" et seQ. Zoning cþ". C.J.S. Eminent Domain I 209 et aeq. O.J.S. ZoDiD&, I 4.. 1. Conatructfon and .pp"eat"." General 8treet 1mpl'OTemeet atatutM held not to bar home rule clU._ trom ex- ercising atatutolT powen of makJD8' atreet lmprovementa. Andenon 'Y. Bran40a (1932) 121 T. 181. t, S. W.2d 311. . .: ~ 't1~ ,; . 'Arto 110Sb. Street improvemeDts a.nd u.eeømentw in cities bav- ing more than 1000 inhabitants '. Power to make improyemeatø; bomadar1 etreeU Section 1. (a) That cities, towns and villages incorporated un.. der either general or special law, including those operating underspe- cia] charter, or amendments of charter adopted pursuant to the Home Rule provisions of the Constitution, shall have power to cause to be improved, any highway, within their limits by filling, grading, raising, .paving, repaving, and repairing in a permanent manner, and by con- structing, reconstructing, repairing and realigning curbs, gutters and sidewalks, and by widening, narrowing and straightening, and by con- structing'appurtenances and incidentals to any of such improvements, inqJuding drains and culverts, .whiëh power shall include that of caus- ing to be made anyone or more of thekfnd8 or clasaes of improve- ments herein named or any combination ~ereof, or of parts thereof. (b) Whenever a part of the boundary of any such city is upon or along any street or highway, which at that point lies wholly within, partly within and partly without or wholly outside of its limits, such city may improve such' portion of such street and assess a part of the cost thereof against the abutting property lying on both sides of such street by the proceedings set forth in this Act, provided that if such street lies wholly or partly within the limits of any other such city the governing body thereof shall consent to the improvement and if assessments are levied against any property lying within the limits of any other city than the one (1) initiating the improvement, the gov- erning body of such other city shall consent to such assessments as 480 . t t ! I ~."'''---..-''''~~-_...~- ....~... ~' LLOYD BENTSEN TEXAS 1:af1fl . ..... PINAHCE IEHVIRONMCNT AHO PUa.lC WOMCS JOINT I:COHOM.C e "11 Cni£eb 's'fa£e$ .$enate WASHINGTON. D.e. 2OS1() February 10, 1981 Dear Friend: Knowing that you share my concern over the damage that Revenue Procedure 80-55 threatens to do to state and local government budgets, I am writing to infonn you of the developments on this issue in recent dayS. e As you know, this ruling was issued December 15, 1980, and would have retroactively prohibited banks from deducting the interest on accounts, such as state and local government accounts, that are secured by pledges of tax exempt securities. This would greatly reduce the demand for nnmicipal bonds at a time when the market is already severely depressed, and it would cause banks to reduce the amount of interest paid on public deposits. Both actions would severely hurt state and local governments and their taxpayers. In response to my letter of December 30, IRS dropped the retroactive portion of Revenue Procedure 80-55, and then postponed the effective date of 80-55 until June 1, 1981. On January 28 I sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Donald Regan pointing out the importance of this problem and requesting that he act quickly to withdraw 80-55. This letter was cosigned by 34 other Senators in a bipartisan display of strong support for my position. I believe that IRS has stretChed the law far beyond the intent of Congress in this case and is pursuing additional revenue at the expense of state and local governments. I hope that this problem will be solved administratively, but I have introduced legislation which will specifically permit these transactions to go on as they have for so many years before. This bill, S. 321, will be a permanent solution to this problem, and if the Administration fails to act I will ~h for· quick action on it before the June 1 deadline imposed by IRS. -This is a major problem in Texas, which has pledging requirements which are aJIDIlg the strictest in the nation, but it is also a problem in the 32 other states which have pledging requirements on public deposits. I am working with a number of groups and associations which are interested in this issue, and I have also receivedstròng grass-roots support from people such as yourself who are concerned and knowledgeable about this issue. I would appreciate any additional support that you can give in my efforts to reverse this IRS decision and win passage of this legislation, and I assure you that I will continue to press for an early solution to this problem. e e -- ,! , TMI. '!~~~O~~~~~l L~~)~~ February 7, 1981 Mr. Rex MCEntire, City Attorney City of North Richland Hills Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear R.ex: As you know, cities and other taxing entities have been engaged in a series of see-saw courtroom struggles over the taxation of certain bank stocks. In Bank of Texas, et al. v. John Childs et-al., the City of Dallas lost in district court and again in the court of civil appeals, but subsequently prevailed in the court of civil appeals on a motion for rehearing. Several days ago, prior to Dallas' victory in the court of civil appeals, representatives of the Texas Bankers Association (TBA) approached me with a proposed legislative solution to the debate over taxing bank stock. Under the TRA compromise proposal, state legislation would be enacted to exempt bank. stock from ad valorem taxation. In return, the banks would agree to subject themselves to State franchise taxation, with the proceeds to be re- mitted back to cities, counties, and other local entities. , . Because of the diversity in bank-taxation procedures among jurisdictions across the State, there~is no method of determining precisely how individ- - ual cities would fare under the proposed TBA/THL agreement. The only cex- . tainty is that many cities would be comparative losers--that is, roughly speaking, the statewide total in bank. franchise taxes remitted back to the cities would be about 25% less than the amount they are currently col- lecting from ad valorem taxes on bank. stock. Obviously, the argument 'over taxing bank. stock in not over. If cities and other jurisdictions continue to tax bank stock in the present manner, the Texas Bankers Association will appeal to the Texas Supreme Court. the case then will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, regardless of which party prevails. With this background, the purpose of this letter is t~ ask your opinion, and the opinion of your city council, as to the course of action TML should follo~ with respect to this issue. Should we work at holding the line at the status quo, or should we work with the TBA on the proposed compromise legislation? · "__~.-...___.~~~__._"_ __._~._~_ _,,_......:........:....._.___'.~......_,_.. _ ". 'N~ _" . N__ .....'._._.._.._._....._' -.;...- ..,.~.....~-... ---~--........-. .,......,.-. -. -......_~,..-~. -...-., -..~ ... -.' .~.-.-.- ----..:...:.-.-.- -. ~----,. ...#~_._.....-----=---- Mr. Rex McEntire, City Attorney Ci~y of North Richland Hills Box'18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Page 2 The relative risks are clear. Perhaps the cities can defeat TBA's proposed franchise tax legislation, and continue taxing bank stock as presently. Also, however, the cities could lose wnen the case is finally decided by the U.S. Supreme Court: the effect of an adverse decision would slash the cities' bank stock tax collections to virtually nil. If the Texas Municipal League agrees to the TBA proposal and it is approved by the Legislature, the primary issue in the Childs case would be mooted. Then, cities would at least collect more from the banks than they will if we lose the case When it is finally decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Texas Bankers Association will have it~ draft proposal completed and _ ready for ~eview in th~ next day or two. A representative of the TBA will be contacting you in the near future to provide you with further details on the plan. , Your counsel as to TML's proper course"'ôf action on this matter will be channelled to the Board of Directors of the League for a decision. Please let us hear from you by February 20. Sincerely~ ~ R1chård D. Brown Executive :Director RDB/ds Encl. y{c: Mr. Charles W. Wllliam.s~ , P.S. Please contact David LaBrec, !ML General Counsel, if you have questions concerning this matter. ., c/}6ilAect&¿ II" 1111 , ~ -- CHARLES C. BRINKLEY Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer -- e ... " I NAT.IONAL BANK P.o. BOX 18000 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 PHONE 284-4711 February 17, 1981 Charles W. Williams, City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Chuck: We are interested in supporting the pro- posed legislation for Franchise Tax instead of Bank Stock Tax. This legislation is submitted by Lynn Nabers. Because of some of the banking industry to seek fair and just taxation it would be in the best interest of our City to support this new taxation bill. ~ Sincerely yours, c¿ ·11 i!._<<._ _ / Charles Brinkley CB:ls - TO: Chuck Williams, City Manager DATE Februa'ry 18, 1981 FROM: Wanda Calvert, Planning & Zoning Coordinator SUBJECT: Zoning Cases to be heard by City Council February 23, 1981 PZ 80-21, PZ 80-22, PZ 80·23 Request of John W. Barfield to rezone portions of Tracts 3A, 3B~ 4A~ 48, & 5~ Brentwood Estates, from their present classifications of Agriculture to . proposed classifications of IF-8-1400~ Commerci a 1, and Lo'ca 1 Reta i 1 .. . . This property is located south of Shady- Grove Road and bounded on the east by Precinct Line Road. e . . l' e . DATE: 2-18-81 SUBJECT: PI 80-21, PI 80-22~ & PI 80-23 - Three zoninq requests. for 4IÞ Brentwood Estates. DEPARTMENT: PlanninQ and Zoning BACKGROUND: This tract of land was platted several years aQO as just one larQe tract of 1 and \'/i th the proposed "new" Shady Grove Road shown to intersect wi th . a road in Hurst directly across Precinct Line Road. This was to coincide with the master plan of the city. The zonìng was never changed from Agriculture. Mr. Barfield has submitted Sinqle Far.1ily~ 'four Commercial tracts and one Local Retail tract. This property is located on both sides of Davis Blvd. just south' of old Shady Grove' Road. e The Planni'ng and Zoning COßl11Î'ss;on recoJm1ended approval of,all three req'uests. These re uests ~/ere heard and ost onedb)' the City Council 'Jul 28, 198Ö'. . ....... __'<M_'~_,<,_, . ,....-... .... . "_"~_"'._"'-'''' They \'/ere heard agaié~~~~~~t~ 15th an,d) at that time were apprõveC:~~~t.f3th-) these requests were reconsidered by the council and were postponed until February due to the pending contract with a land planner. Feb. 13th..,,~~/ Mr. Sa rfi e 1 d. ancJ e in-a-ttendance. Snyder, the Land Planner, to discussthi's'additi CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUÌRED: ' Wayne Snj/der will Approval or Denial by Council .9 BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO, X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ---~~-----------~-~-~-~~~-~~--~--~----~-----~-~---~~~~~-~~-~~-~~~---~~-~~~-~--~~ ,e ~-, ........ ~ July· Z8, 1980' Page 2 Mayor Pro Tem Freeman advised the Council. this was a Mayor's appointment with approval of a majority of the Council. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard. to confirm the following appointments to the Park and Recreation Commission: CONFIPMTIor~ OF BOARD AND COr~I APPOINTMENTS FOLLOWS: PARKS & R MARVIN WILLI BRENTS~ TOM NNElL ~1arvin Smith William Brents Tom Connell Motion carried 6·0. r'ayor Pro Tern Freeman advi sed the Counc; 1 thi s was a Counci,l appointment. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hub rd, to approve the following to the Board of Adjus r-1arie Hinkle H. B. Helton Dr. E. K. Hahn Jack Roseberry Jesse Range Bill Stinmel '·1artin Erch BOARD OF ADJUSn,tENTS: MARIE HINKLE DR. E. K. HAHN H. B. HELTON JACK ROSEBERRY, JESSE RANGE ALTERNATE - t1ARTI N ERCK AND BILL STIMMEL ,j ~'otion carried 6-0. f1ayor Pro Tem Freeman ad . sed the Counci 1 thi s was a Mayor's appointment wi a two~thirds' vote of theCounéil. Councilwoman Grove ~ved, s~onded by Councilman Wood, to approve the f 'owi ng appà+1 ntments: to the Library board:. LIBRARY - MRS. LYNN OIDAY, MR. RON S'MOTHERMAN MRS. CHARLES BRINKLEY . HRS . JAM DANIEL Ms. Lynn O'Day Mr~ Ron Smotherman Mrs. Charles Br;nkley Mrs. Jan Daniels rtayor Pro Tem Freeman opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone present wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 80-21, REQUEST OF JOHN W. BARFIELD TO REZONE PORTIONS OF . TRACT 3A, 38, 4A~ & 5~ BRENTWOOD ESTATES .- FROM AGRICULTURAL TO IF-8~1400 ONE FAMILY, DWELLING . - ,.,... ...... .......-.-. - . ~ ~....... - - - . .- -- ~ .---... - -- , ~:; .. _ ~,·~::,·-··-·":·_-t.. ~ . .... ;: ...~, July 28~ 1980 .', Page 3 Mr. John Barfield, Developer, Hurst, Texas, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield stated this property was located south of Shady Grove Road. The property is presently zoned agricultural and he was requesting IF-8-1400 one family zoning. Mr. Barfield stated he felt thi$ was a good . location for this size of housing. Mr. Barfield stated he planned to develop as soon as possible.. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Barfield how many lots there would be. Mr. Doug Long, Engineer, stated there would be between 500 and 600 lots. . ." t I ~~ 'J \ - J - '- I', ~ , f ~i 1 f!1 ~ j tJ~ -J Uj j 1\ ~ !i l\ ~t i J ~ -t ~ ~ ,\ I, iÎ j ·1 : I Councilman Kenna asked if the city would be able to adequatelY serve the area with water and sewer. Mr. Ablin replied yes. Councilman Wood asked what kin~of time· frame the development would be on. Mr. Barfield stated it would probably be five to eight years before the development was totally developed. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Albin if the city's water system would be able to serve the upper plain when TRA water came into the city, without the proposed 2.M.G. storage tank. Mr. Albin'stated yes, it would carry this develpment... Councilman Brady asked tt)eaverage size of the lots. Mr. Long stated the lots would be a nñnimua of 8,000 square feet. Councilman Brady asked the size of the houses.. Mr. Long stated the houses would be 1,400 Squarê feet. Councilman Brady asked where the schools were located in the immediate area. . . . Mr. Barfield stated he did not know the location of the schools. Mayor Pro Tem Freeman called for anyone present wishing to speak in a,position of this request to please come forward. ..- - .." July 28, 1980 Page 4- . Mrs. Della Allison, 8209 Precinct Line Road, appeared before the Council. Mrs. ,Allison stated she was not opposed to the size of the houses, but the proposed road that would come across her property. Mrs. Allison stated if the road was extended across her property it would cross her septic lines and ., she was afraid they w~uld collapse. Mrs. Allison stated that Precinct Line Road carried a lot of traffic at this time,and this development would cause more traffic. . . Mrs. Allision stated she was against the street going in. Mr. Long stated they did not indenø to go across Mrs. Allisonls property.'They were attempting to plat around her property. Mrs. Allison stated this subdivision would be in the Keller School District and she had contacted them and they knew nothing about the area being developed. Mayor Pro Tem Freeman called for anyone -else wishing to speak, there being none, Mayor Pro Tem Freeman closed the public hearing. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to deny PZ 80-21. Counci lman Hubbard stated he h,ad tal ked to surrounding cities and no city allowed this size of lot. Councilman Hubbard stated he felt the' the lot size was too small. Councilman Hubbard stated he' also felt there would be a fire hazard;. the street were, not adequate and there- would not be adequate. school facilities. Councilman Wood· stated it, had been the policY of ,the Council to ask for'negotiations with the developer when the density- was at a high ratel Councilman Wood stated he felt the school d'istrict should have the right to have some in-put on this proposed subdivision. After further discussion, Councilman Brady stated he was in favor of postponing action on this request and have the staff and developer meet to try and work oU,t some solutition. Councilman Hubbard with drew his motion. Councilwoman Groves withdrew her second. Councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to postpone PZ 80-21. i ',' ' t CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-21; , POSTPONED . · .' ., ~.. -~, ..---..-.-....-. - ._- - ' July 28, 1980 Poage 5 Mr. Barfield advised the Council that items 10s Us 12, and 13 were all related to item 9, PZ 80-21 and he would per fer all be postponed. councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilman Kennas to postpone i terns 10 thorugh 13. Motion carried 6-0. PUBLIC' HEARING - PZ 80-22s REQUEST OF . JOHN W, BARFIELD TO REZONE PORTIONS OF . TRACTS 3A~' 4A, & 48,· BRENTWOOO ESTATES FROM AGRICUL ruRAL TO, COMMERCIAL POSTPONED CONSIDERATION' OF ORDINANCE FOR'PZ80-22 POSTPONED PUBLIC HEARING ~ PZ 80-23, REQUEST OF JOHN W. BARFIELD TO REZONE PORTIONS OF TRACT,3A~ BRENTWOOD ESTATES FR()t MICUL TURA TO LOCAL RETAIL POSTPONED COHSoIDERÂTION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ.. 80-23 POSTPONED , .' ~ Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Kennas to approve Resolution No. 80-24. Mo'iton carried, 6-0. . Mr. James Bennett, 7120 Stoneybrook" appeared be the Counci 1 . Mr. Bennett stated he would like a a water well for outside water;n Councilman Wood aske . Bennett".if he was aware there was a 200 limi.t· on water wells. CÒNSIDERATIO OF REQUE~·· OF JAMES T. BENNETT~ 7120 STONEYBROOK TO, DRILL, A WELL APPROVED Ben . :stated he was not aware of thelimi,t, a ~ót i'ntend to' go that deèp. ..;_._ -_ .r-..- "~.---.~' ....,. -"'~.-"'- _'_~_'4_""'____"'____·. -' - ~-- r e 14. { ( ",". .-6",",. ,.,' >, ."''':'''.~.:., . ,.- <. . ~""'~..~...,~ :",- ( October 13, 1980 ,Pag~ 8 ,Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to reconsider PZ 80-21, PZ 80-22, and PZ 80-23. POSSIBLE RECONSIDERATION OF PZ 80-21~ PZ80-22t PZ 80-23 APPROVED Motion carried 5-2; Councilmen Kenna, Wood, Thomas, Freeman and Councilwoman Groves voting for; Councilmen Hubbard and Brady voting against. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves to reconsider PZ 80-21, PZ 80-22 and PZ 80-23 on February 9, 1981. Motion çarried 7-0. 15. Mayor Faram advised the Council Mr. Kloberdanz wanted to build a 231x34' building in the back of his residence and not be required to brick it. Mayor Faram stated accessory buildings over 200 square feet must be bricked. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF RON KLOBERDANZ· F A VARIANCE RICK ORDINAN DENIE Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to deny Mr. Kloberdanz's request for a variance to the brick ordinance. Councilman Freeman asked where the property was located that Mr. Kloberdanz wanted to build on. f- Mayor Faram stated the property backed up to Fossil Cr I ~ s~mewhere in the neighborhood of the park. t 16. .('-~~ Councilman Thomas stated he felt this request w different from most because the building would be 183 t from the house. Motion to deny carried 5-2; Councilmen F eman, Brady, Wood and Hubbard and Councilwoman Groves v for; Councilmen Kenna and Thomas voting against. City AttorneyMtEntire~dvised he recommended passing this ordinance. CONSIDERATION' OF ORDINANCE TO DENY RATE INCREASE OF TEXAS ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. APPROVED . ORDINANCE NO. 848 Councilman Kenna moved, to approve Ordinance by Councilwoman Groves~ 17. Mr. Albin s ed that at the last public hearing the needs , of the Co nity Development Program target area was considered. This ar is bounded on the south by Onyz Drive South; on the nart y Glenview Drive; on the east by Rufe Snow Drive; and on th est by Rogene. These needs were found to be drainage improvements Mackey Creek Channel. Citizen input forms were provided and are still available for those wishing to make an input. The purpose of this public hearing is to consider the projects which will satisfy these needs. The City Staff in the absence of citizen input has proposed a continuation o,f the 3 year Community Development .. .~ " _. .-.--..- "--~'. ---- ..-,.....-- -. -....'~, ....' ----.-~,.,.- - ~ September 15~ 1980 . Page 3 rouncilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Counci"lman Freeman, :0 postpone action on this request 'until the next Council ~eting and someone from Gulf be present at the meeting ~o determine what type of building would be at the location. ~tion carried 5~1; Councilmen Freeman, -Kenna, Hubbard ·.!nd Wood and Councilwoman Groves voting for; Councilman Brady "toting against. vayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning Mad recommended approval of this request. Vayor Faram advised the Council that Hr. Jim Stevens ;;as here in interest of item 6 and item 19. With the Council's permission he would like to move item 19 :ehind item 6 because Mr. Stevens had another, cammi PS 80-31 - REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 2~ 'BLOCK 2, ~ and LOT l~ BLOCK 3, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION APPROVED Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by '~ouncilman to approve PS 80-31.. ~tion carried 6-0. .- ~r. Jim Stevens, Stevens-Owen Company Counci 1 . CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LOUIS SOUTH- WESTERN RAILWAY CO. AND THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND BILLS APPROVED , ~r. Stevens stated the nature of he agreement, ,was to get into the Ind'ustrial Pa~ from Industrial Park 30ulevard at ~he railroad cr: sing. Mr. Stevens stated the developers wou be paying for the crossing. . ~ayor Faram asked if e total cost would be paid by the developers. ~ :1 Councilman ad moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to approv the authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreem '.with the provision that the letter from Oak" ~ ' , urov ated· 'September 10, 1980,be a part of said agreement. ion carried 6-0. - '!~yor Faram opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone ~lshing to speak in favor of this request to please come 70l"Na rd. ~r. John Barfield, 416 loulla, Hurst, appeared before the ~Ounci 1 . ~aYor Faram asked Mr. Barfield if he had any objections to hOlding the public hearing at this time on all three oaf hi s requests. ,PUBLIC HEARING- PZ 80-21, REQUEST OF JOHN BARFIELD TO REZONE PORTIONS OF' TRACTS 3A, 38, 4A,. & 5, BRENTWOOD ESTATES FROt1 AGRICULTURE TO IF-8-1400-0NE FAMILY DWELLING ~..__._._-'..._, ~'"" -'-- ""0._- ..-_. ...-._ .__-_._..,~__._..~ ~ ..._~ _ '~._ ._._..._._..___. . .0 ....._....., .....'. __..~..._~___,_ __.". I , I I I ~, .. '..- . -. .." .----.... . ~ - - ' - ' -- .. september' 15, 1980 Page 4 ' , " Mr. Barfield stated he had no objections. Hr. Barfield stated this property wa~ located at the far end of the city. This property contained 180 acres.' · Hr. Barfield stated he and Mr. Doug Long- had met about a month ago with city staff and some of the Council members to try and work out any questio.ns or problems w.ith the zoning request. Mr. Barfield stated that if this zoning request was approved~ his next step would be to profne the sewer to serve the subdivision. Mr. Barfield stated the water was already available. Councilman Hubbård stated several things were covered in the meeting with Mr. Barfield and Mr. Long. Councilman Hubbard stated that Mr. Barfield had discussed the possibility of a tempOrary fire station on Block 14~ Lot 8. Councilman Hubbard stated that Mr. Barfield had expressed the point that he would be willing to go along with the station at his cost. Councilman Hubbard stated he assumed that meant·the cost of the property and cost of construction of the building. Mr. Barfield stated that· was his intention. Councilman Hubbard stated he had talked to Mr. Kenneth Payne with the Keller School District and he had told him there was no way his school system could take care of this amount of people, unless some agreement could be worked out where the school system could purchase a minimum of ten acres for a school building. Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Barfield if there was anywhere in this tract that he could see fit to sell ten acres to the school district. Mr. Barfield stated he had sold two sites in the past to school districts and cbuld see no reason why he could not work out something on this tract. . Councilman Hubbard stated that Mr. Barfîeld was requesting IF-8 zoning~ but had agreed that he would put 50% of the lots at 9,000 square feet.· Mr. Barfield stated that was correct. Councilman Hubbard stated the type of fire station that would be built was to be a house built along Davis Boulevard and look exactly as the homes in the area with the entrance coming off Davis Boulevard with the garage doors to service the fire trucks and in the future the city could sell it as a residence if not needed for a fire station. .' . . . ' ..~... . ~ ,~ - -- -"_.- .-.-:.-.-.---..---. .~.. September 15, 1980 Page 5 ~'1r. Barfield stated· the station would be a residence as such, it would be just like the rest of the residences. Councilman Hubbard stated that t~r. Barfield had also agreed that if the request was approved that a stipulation would be placed on the ordinance that 50% of the lots would be 9,000 square feet. . Mr. Barfield stated that was correct. Councilman Brady asked Mr. Barfield the earliest date he would start developing homes. Mr. Barfleld stated not knowing. how long it would take to work out the sewer line, he was sure some easements would have to be secured. Mr. Barfield stated if they could secure the easements he hoped that in a·year to a year and'one~half from now that'he would' be able . to have a developed lot. Mr. Barfield stated he \.¡ould develop in phases, probably twenty acres a phase. Councilman Brady asked Mr. Barfield considering the size of the houses and the time frame, wha~ he thought the home would sell for. Hr. Barfield stated he had some 1,400 square foot homes in Stoneybrook and they were selling between $63,000.00 and $69,000.00 d~pending on the plan and lot size. Mr. Barfield stated that by the time the homes were built in Brentwood Estates and they continued to escalate as they have in the past they would sell for around $75,000. Cauncilman Brady asked Mr. ~rfield if he felt that-in one to. tWo yeàrS hè would b'e able to sell that size house at that price. r~r. Barfield stated that at the present ti"me that was about the only market he had. Mr. Barfield stated he was selling 1,400 to. 1,500 square foot homes in . Crestwood. . . . Pl 80-22 was heard at this time.- Hr. Barfield stated this property was located at the intersection of Highway 1938 and Shady Grove Road. Mr. Barfield stated he was asking .for commercial zoning on that section of property. ~ . ..' - PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 80-22, REQUEST OF JOHN BARFIELD . I . TO REZONE PORTIONS OF TRACTS 3A, 38, " 4A, 48, BRENTWqOD ESTATES FROM AGRICULTURE TO COMMERCIAL . . ·_'V"~,._,.'" __. _'__.........._,'__~_ .. ._._~. '_...._....~_......__~____...__ . I :1 ,... .....-. '-"""'.'--'.'- .... . -. - ... .~_... ~ -"-",...--..<.-- ....~--;--__.___..1;_. """.'"'-,-_ .,~, .....:. _._.___'-__. .____..__. ~.__..;. .._...~..~:___...._......_'_:':"._.:...:. :~~. __...__ -'~_ Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barfield if he could settle for any zoning less than commercial. Mayor Faram asked nr. Barfield what his plans for the property we re · Mr. Barfield stated he planned to build a shopping center · Mayor Faram asked if local retail zoning would satisfy those needs. Mr. Barfield asked if a fire st~tion could be built in local retail. , ~ayor Faram stated you did not have to have zoning for a fire station. Certain things were exempt from zoning. Mayor Faram stated, that in his ,opi.nion there were certain things under commercial zoning that would be 'ûndesirable for a neighborhood. Councilman Wood read from the Zoning Ordinance what businesses was allowed in local retail. f'1ayor Faram asked Mr. Barfield if he could reduce his request to local retail. Mr. Barfield stated he saw no problem with local retail zoning. Mayor Faram called for anyone present wishing to speak in opposition of the requests to please come forward. Mrs. Nancy Simmons, 8725 Stewa~, appeared before the Coune; 1.. Mrs. Simmons stated she was here to say mainly that the· homes Mr. Barfield planned to build would bring in several more vehicles. Mrs. Simmons stated she did not think Shady Grove Road could handle the vehicles. Mrs. Simmons stated that the Shady Grove Road and Davis Boulevard was 'a dangerous intersection and if more homes were built it was goi ng to bri ng more people tryi n9 to get off . Shady Grove on to Davis. Mrs. Simmons stated she did not think the intersection could handle· the traffic and Davis Boulevard could not handle it. ... .... --. --. :. . .~._._... - .... september 25, 1980 Page 6 1 , : t \ i l; \ , I . l ; I ¡ ! \ ~ , t ! , j L ~ \ I 1 ~ ì i , , , h ! : i \ \ l\~ ! t \~ ~r ; \ ~ t : ~ \ j ! t ! I ,: f r l h \ , \ ~ ¡ ¡II! ~ t \ ~ \ ; \ \ \ ì I \ J ~ _...... .,.___ _...:.""-' _ __._ ___. .___.-.-----. ._.."2. _.~. ~ ----,..... .- :.trs. Sil1ll1ons stated she 'had been here in the past and heard oeople talk of the drainage and sewer. One lady in particular that lived. on Shady Grove could not get sewer. Mrs. Simmons' asked ~'r. Barfield if he would offer sewer to this lady. Mrs. Simmons stated the drainage ditches and bar ditches out in that part of town should be maintained by the city · ~hen Mr. Barfield started building a lot of homes out there, there would be a lot of concrete and a lot of streets. Mrs. Sil1ll1on stated that normally agriculture land could take up a lot of water~ but when' this water started 'running down the streets where would it go. Mrs. Sil1ll1ons stated she heard that Mr. Barfield was willing to donate land for the school. Mrs. Simmons stated she was all for the school system but as it stands, the school could not handle the kids that would be brought in. Mrs. Simmons stated that as far as water was concerned, the water pressure was already bad. Mrs. Simmons stated she did not think Mr. Barfield should be allowed to build. City Attorney Re~ McEntire present now. Mr. Charles E. Rojenau, 6929 Precinct Line Road, appeared before the Council. ~Ir. Rojenau stated the only thing he would like to add to what Mrs. Sil11110ns said was that severa,l ·weeks ago he was present in the discussing of the tax increase.. Mr. Rojenau stated it was brought up~t that meeting by the Council that industry was what brought. in th~ tax revenue. Mr. Rojenau stated the ,building of small homes cost the city more to maintain than they received in-'taxes. Mrs. Stella Allison, 8209 Precinct Line Road, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Allison stated she had protested the road change Mr. Barfield planned before. Mrs. Allison 'stated Mr. Barfield proposed to change Shady Grove Road to meet up with McDonald School Road to come 'straight acros 5 . t1rs . All; son s ta ted the road wou 1 d come straight across her property and she still protested. There being no one else wishing to speak~ Mayor Faram closed the public hearing. . -----. ~-~ j September 15, 1980 'I, t I . Page 7 - :~I .\ t\,' . . I ¡ t~',,'- ~; . Ii ~ i: . ¡~ k \. " I: ~a .11 \:, 1!1 ~. ~t ¡f~ ~ !1P ;; It ti' t ~ t!l1 ¡. !i~J I ~ r¡ ~:J f': ~J;1 r. r ¡;r ;.,; : I t, ; ... J - ------ ,.....' ,..-...----- -....---.......-. _....... ..-- councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PZ 80-21, Ordinance No. 841, with the stipulation a minimum of 50% of the lots be 9,000 Square feet; Block 14, Lot 8, be available for a temporary fire station for the City of North Richland Hills and a minimum of 10 acres of land be made available for a Keller School District site below" or at Mr. Barfield's cost. Councilman Freeman stated that he would request that the Council look at this zoning from the $tand point of the zoning map. The whole north end of that end of town had never been zoned. Councilman Freeman stated it was his feeling that by approving this zoning the Council would be in effect planning the north end of the city. Councilman Freeman stated that if you looked at the zoning map he would say you could propab1y put five or six subdivisions of the same size in. Councilman Freeman stated that ìf it was the Counci1's intention to plan the north end of town for smaller houses and smaller lots, which he considered a 1F-8-14" a very small house in N~rth Rich1and Hills, and he hoped the Council would take a hard look at this. Councilman Freeman stated he felt if this zoning was approved .it would set a trend. for the north end of the city.- -,~' Councilman Brady stated he was in the opinion that the city needed to continue to develop. Councilman Brady stated it was apparent to him that the economic situations are such that they really were talking about some pretty expensive properties if the city stuck to something more than 1,400 square feet. Councilman Brady stated he recogni zed the vcQ i di ty of Council man Freeman'c s ". . suggestion about the possibility if this zoning was approved. Councilman Wood stated he would like to make some comnents on Mrs. Sil1l11Ons' statements, some of which had been "answered by Councilman Brady. Councilman Wood stated the policy on sewer was quite clear. The city had a'major sewer out-fall line which this system would bring on line probably for the first time since it had been lying in the ground. Councilman Wood stated he was not convinced that the city had a big drainage problem to the south of the property' in question because there was a natural drainage system that the water was being put into. Councilman Wood stated that if the Council tried to limit the growth of the ci ty or say there was no more room, that would be like asking Mr. Barfield to just pay his taxes and leave the city alone. Councilman Wood stated the Council did not have the right to tell people they could not come to North Richland Hills and build. Councilman Wood stated he was beginning to feel the same as Councilman Freemar.., ._.-... .-.... ..,' . ..-" -- . ~. .... .- .......... . . " ,. "','.. ",":". .......... - - ,- r ,~-;;:" -- - . ~,._-' _=:.' . '.- :.-.:.: ~-'~ . September 15,. 1980 . Page 8 - , CONSIDERATION ) ORDINANCE FOR PI 80-21 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 841 ---- - _. ,----. -..--....---.-- ~..,.~..-.._-..~- .-...- .... '. .. .-" ...- ----" ~-_._--_._- ~_ ........ .....___..~ ......_JIIII>.....-.-_..-_- September 15, 1980 P.age 9 but in this case he thought it would behoove the Council to probably approve this particular zoning. Councilman Wood stated he would encourage the Council to draw a line in the near future. Councilman Wood stated that in this particular case he heard nothing that would not help the city but to grow in the right direction. Councilman Freeman stated he would like to respond to two things; the first one would be to Mr. Brady's economical conditions of the nation. Councilman Freeman stated he had been on the Council for three terms and that each zoning he had seen less than 9,000 square. feet; the reason for downgrading the house size had been the economic conditions and the cost . of housing. Councilman Freeman stated he felt strongly that what the Council was looking at tonight was the direction the city would' be going in. Mayor Faram asked what ti~ frame would be the starting and completion of the residential portion of the project. Councilman Brady stated t1r. Barfield had indicated he would have a house on the ground in 12 to 18 months. Mayor Faram stated the problem he found sometime zoning so far in advance was that you faced the problem of land use change. Mayor Faram stated he had tried for sometime to get the Council to come up with some type of idea that after a period of time if no action was taken on the 1a~s that had been zon~ then it should revert back to an original type zoning. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Barfield if he would agree to ~ determination date if the development did not materialize. Mr. Barfield stated he had no objections to the ti. limit. After-further' discussion, Counci lmanWood moved-, seconded· by Counci1man-Brady-:tö. amend-- the motion to state' the planning engineering and construction.wouJd.beginwithin-threeyears of homes' of this clãssificatïon. Amended motion carried 5-1; Councilmen Kenna, Wood, Hubbard, Brady and Freeman voting for; Councilwoman Groves voting agaînst. Mayor Faram ca11~ for a vote on the original motion as amended. Motion carried by a vote of 4-2; Councilmen Wood, Brady, Kenna, and Hubbard voting for; Councilman Freeman and Councilwoman Groves voting against. . . I ~. ,'" : I : , ~¡ - 1 !I I II ~i ~. ~: I, ij' i ~' I ¡ \ PUBLIC HEARING - . r APPEAL HEARIN I ~ PI 80-25, ¡ JOHN SA ! REIO PORTION OF I T 2~ ABSTRACT 1150' OM AGRICULTURE TO IF-8--1400 ....-ø r___ ____-r __........,-.,.-...".,.... -... ._..............__.__....._.IfI/IÞ">. -'-"'-'~'''''' ..."- September' 15, 1980 Page 10 Public hearing for PZ 80-22. (Held in conjunction . \'li th PZ 80-21) Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Ordinance No. 842, with the stipulation the ordinance be changed to state IIrezoned from agriculture· to local retail.~· CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-22 APPROVED, ORDINANCE NO. 842 pùblic hearing for PI 80-23. (Held in conjunction with PZ 80..21) Motion carried 5-1; Councilmen Kenna, Wood, Hubbard, Freeman and Brady voting for; Councilwoman Groves voting against. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to approve PZ 80-23, Ordinance No. 843. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-23 APPROVED ORDINANCE, NO. 843- Motion carried 5-1; Councilmen Kenna, Wood, Hubbard, . Freeman and Brady 'voting for;' Councilwoman Groves voting against. . Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forwa~d. Mr. John Barfield, developer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield stated this property was located to the north of the railroad tracks, east of Precinct Line Road and south of Amundson Road. Mr. Barfield stated that at this time the property was designed industrial. ~)Mr. Barfield stated he. . had appeared before the Planning and Zoning C · sion and they denied the request for 1 F-8-1400. ~ · Barfield . stated heta 1 ked with s~ of the people 11 ved in that area ånd it was their desire that ses be built rather than industrial. Mr. Barfield stated this prope in the meeting with some of e Council members and city' staff and he had agreed' the IF-8-l400 zoning request was approved he would x the lot sizes. '.1r. Barfield st Clhe felt the best use of the property would be res; tial. Mayor F m stated he had heard some indication that Hurst want to undertake the improvement of Precinct Line Road. M r Faram asked Mr. Barfield if this had been discussed lth him. t . s '1 I t I 1 þ....~ ~ -~,.~ _.- .- . _.. __~__... _~""':' J_;--:-__ ..~,~ - _~...-..';'........ _p", _:.._.__ ~,-- ",_. -_..~._,--. e e e \.. ( "......, ( KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas June 17, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-21 AG TO IF-8-1400 We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Charles W~ Williams, City Manager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 7ð021· 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3387 - . - ....' ...-...,. . -,~' -~._----- -....-...... .',-- ~...... ~.._._..-..-..- -- ·..···-_-·__.....·····_·.._____..·-_c___.._....... -.,........ ~~_.--. .-. -" -,-- -.-->-. -.- . ..... ..--. .--. ......--.... '''- e e e ,..... ...._-.'T'"~,.,.~--~ _____.~. -0 ... (~ C~· .; - . '.. ... KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas June 17, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-22, AG TO COMMERCIAL We have received the subject zoni,ng case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. D/ - ~IJ), ~ ~~ P.E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Charles w~ Williams, City Manager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities 5~ FIRST. STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 7t5021· 8t7/283-8211· METRO/287-3387 .- .-- - -',' -,"-'-~"""",-,~,.",,-~- -.......... -~-' - - ---, ~._.....",....~.._......-.... .----,..-- -... --. '-"- ---- ..-.-'-- -.-.. -... ~.."..- ~--.~ ....-.- .....'.- ... .-..--.........- . ..---..,-- ,. -------,,_.- '_.'--.-:'---""'--'-'---. ....... e ~e e co c KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas June 17, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS I ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ,80-23 AG. TO L.R. We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Charles W.~Williams, City Manager ,Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities !5!50 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021· 817/283-8211. METRO/2tS'7-33fS7 :'.'":'""',._._.~..,..,-,.- ,.. ._~---._.~-_._.. ~.~...--...-:-~-~.--'_..-.....-~-'-,. ----/r.· ..-..._--.-.._____...._._.__._ _........_'_~,__.. ._._____ __......._ -...-.-..-..- ...-....- ...-~. ~... .... - _._-----':"'~---_..- _.~........- ~ ....._- ..~_.~ . , -. . ---.~~'-______.".r_ .___.'"":_. __~.._.~_._ - _...._.....,. _....._. .__.....-..__....__~ . - ~ ~~-,----- _. ~_.-..'- v ... ---..-........,.. - -.--.-.- -_...~- _. '- ~ . ORDINANCE NO. 841 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS, SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOULOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: e RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 80-21 the following described property shall be rezoned from Agriculture to IF-8-1400, with the following stipulatión: A MINIMUM OF 50% of the lots to be 9,000 square feet; Block 14, Lot 8, BE AV"AILABLE FOR A" 'TEMPORARY FIRE STATION FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND A MINIMUM OF 10 ACRES OF LAND BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR A KELLER SCHOOL DISTRICT SITE BELOW OR AT MR. BARFIELD.IS COST. (Tract 4) ALL that certain tract or parcel of land being part of Tracts 3 and 5, Brentwood Estates, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texass as recorded in Volume 388-97 s Page 31, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas';~ and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of said Tract 3, said point being in the West- erly right of way line of Precinct Line Road right of way line; THENCE West 1034.09 feet to a point; THENCE South 0 degrees 09 minutes East, 255.9 feet to a point; THENCE South 79 degrees 47 minutes 10 seconds West, 1694.64 feet to a point; ., THENCE North 26 degrees 40 minutes West, 16~80 feet to a point on' Farm-to-Market Road 1938 (Davis Blvd.); THENCE North 30 degrees 37 minutes East, 1209.04 feet with said right of way line to a point;, . THENCE South 59 degrees 23'minutes Easts 500.0 feet to a point; THENCE North 30 degrees 37 minutes, 450.0 feet to a point; THENCE North 320~44 feet to a point; THENCE North 31 degrees 33 minutes 29 seconds East, 380.0 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes East, 961.13 feet to a point; THENCE South 0 degrees 14 minutes West, 562.32 feet to a point on a Southeasterly curve whose center point bears North 15 degrees 26 minutes 50 seconds,'East, 1056.22 feet; -~.........----- .---... .-....... ._--'.......- ..~.~ .~. .--,--..--.,..- --: I Page 2 fe 4IÞ THENCE Southeasterly with said curve through a central angle of 15 degrees 26 minutes 50 seconds an arc length of 284.76 feet to a point; . THENCE East 26~80 feet to a point on said Precinct Line Road right of way line; THENCE South 2 degrees 43 minutes West, 681.86 feet to the place of beginning and containing 59.217 acres of land. SAVE AND EXCEPT that portion within the right of way of Shady Grove Road, consisting of 2.713 acres of land, leaving a net acreage of 56.504 acres of land. (Tract 5) ALL that certain tract or parcel of land being part of Tract 5, Brentwood Estates, North ~ichland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-97, Page 31, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes ~nd bounds as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of said Tract 5; THENCE North 59 degrees 47 minutes West, 1186.0 feet to a point; THENCE North 26 degrees 40 minutes West, 1445.31 feet to a point; THENCE North 79 degrees 47 ,minutes 10 seconds East, 1694.64 feet to a point; THENCE South 0 degrees 09 minutes East, 2188.96 feet to the place of beginning and containing 52.674 acres of land. (Tract 6) ALL that certain tract or parcel of land being part of Tract 4-A, Brentwood Estates, North R;'chland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-97, Page 31, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at the Southea~t corner of said Tract 4-A, said point being in the Westerly right of way line of Fann-to-Market Road #1938, (Davis.Blvd.); THENCE West 802.5 feet to a point; THENCE North 0 degrees 29 minutes East, 1260.63 feet to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 46 minutes East, 638.96 feet to the beginni,ng of a curve to the right having a radius of 1064.82 feet; THENCE Southeasterly with said curve an arc length of 202.18 feet to a point; THENCE South 0 degrees 29 minutes West, 565.03 feet to a point; THENCE South 15 degrees 55 minutes 16 seconds East, 115.0 feet to a point; 4IÞ THENCE South 86 degrees 46 minutes 30 seconds East, 115.0 feet to a point; ...........>..--........---.-- - . ..-.. --.--"- ...~~. --: i ·e ." e . ·p·å~ 3 . . ,A ." ... ~: , " . ' . . ..' . ".' , ' , . , ~. THENCE, South' 59 degrees ¿3 minutes' E~~t,120.0 feet to a point frt ~aid Fann-to~Market Road #1938 right. of way 1 ine; '. - . .' ' THENCE· South' 30 degrees 37 mi nutes \~est, 575.0 feet to the place of. begin~. ning,and 'containing Z~.795 acr.es.of land. . ""'~; . . ~ , .' . ~ '. .. .. . ,I p' ¡, - . . . , This' p...óPertY is located· south of Shady Grove Road and bounded on the east by Pre'ci nct Li"ne Road wi th approxlmately 100 ~cres ,to the east of t:arm...to- " Market Road #19'38 (Davis,' Blv'd.)" and approximately 25 a:cresto ·thè·westof . Fannj.to-Market Road #1938 (Dav; s Blvd.). , . ,.-' BY THE PlANNING AND ZONING C(JIMISSION THIS 26th, 'DAVQF JUNE' 19RO. . .. . ~~..~ ~~ . - - - - rt p ..ÌHG ZOIC" ISSIÒN CJ~JZ . . SECRETÁRY PLANNING AN -- - 5 ION . BE IT' ORDAINED I~y. THE CITY COUNCIL 'OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHWD HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT ·THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN, CASE NO. PZ' , IS HEREBY 'REZONED THIS', . ÐAYOF·' - "'. ' .' , , MAyOR DICK· FARM _ CITY Of NORTH RIaI.ANo'·HILLS~' " , .. ' : . AntST: .. -tITT SECRETARY JEANErrE MOORE ": CITY OF NORTH RICHlAHD HIllS '. . ' . .~.. . ' \ - ( ~ e' ·e .:..f"'.,,:--~-~---,-,---___,____,_______ "... .. ":': . '. '-...- . .--- .... .-..--. ----.....--...----....._. h_... _...._ ...'.........._..____. ..__..,,___... .... ...__..,._.._______. ..,..~...._.__..._._.'"...~ . ~... . , . ... . . : _1 . . ... . . ".06 . . '. . .000IJWtC£.JIO. . 842 AI ,OIÐINMCÈ· REZflUNG PROPERTY IN ACCORDNCCE . .. WITH· ARTIQ.EXXIX CHANGES AND AMEKMftTS. ' . . SECTION .1. OF . ORDINANCE 1179. ZCIUNG ORDINANœ. . QF'TH£·.CI'IY OF IORTH . RtCHlNtO HILLS.. . 1JXAS, ' , . . ., , . PASSED. .APPROVED, AltO ADOP1tD: 8.Y THE: 'PLAllCII6 . Aim ZCIIDI6. 'CØIIISSIOI AND TII£ cln coœcILOF',. '.' ·TIE .em. GF'NOITK RÏctUII)· HILLS,· NOYEMI£R 13~. .... . . 19117 .ASMIEJ.~Ðr.JAIIIARY.27, 197$ '. '.' .~:' . .' . . . -', I ~ ":AFTEltAPPRoPRIATE '.mICE· -:PU8tIC _111& TH£ FOla-ClfIJl&,RECCllœnONrs',' S_ITTED'TØ· THE . CITY COUNCIL· OF TlECITfOf NOR11f RlqtMOtfl,W IY ~ ., . "",-I. Me ZOIII&ÇØllISSICII~. . . , . '. ., . .... . . . . .... ... . . , . . . ~ .: .,. . . '. -,"," . RESOlVED that Oft cu.. No.· PZ '80-22 . the1onoWt,ng desè"ibMi.Pf'OPèì-tty ~"11. . .. .. rezöMd f1"OIi . AqriCiJ ltur~: : :::::-: : : : :: :..:: : : : : :-: ::'::.>::: :. , ,.. ...to. .. ... . 'L OCA~ . R~T A I L . ' . . . .... ..: " ,. .. . ~ '(Tract 2) . ...,. .... ..... AlL that certain tract or parcel of land being part ,of Tract 3-A, Brentwood . Estates, North Richland"HilJs, Tarrant County, Texas"as recorded in Volume 388-97 , Page 31, Deed Records, Tarrant County ~ Texas, and bei n9 further ... described by metes and bounds as follow~: . · BEGINNING at the'Northwest corner of said Tract 3-A, said point being in the · : Easterly ~ight of way 1 ine of Fann-to-Market Road #1938; . rHENCE North' 89 degr~es 40 minutes East, 400.0 feet to a point; . . · THENcE South 31 degrees 33 minutes 29 seconds West~.380.0 feet to a point; . . .. . . THENCE South 139.11 feet to a point on a Northwestérly curve whose.-center .'. ..<p.>int beal!SNorth 14,degrees 49 minutes 45:;~econds E!lst, 690.66 feet; .... THENCE NorthWestérly with said curve through a central angle of 15· degrees . .. . 47 ~inutes 15 seconds ant'arc .ler:'gth of190.31 feet to a point for, end, of. çurve; . .. ..:.. . . ~ ~-~:".~'.': ~ THENCE North 59 degrees 23. minutes West, 219.74 feet 'to a point..:insaid Fana-~:;.. --" to-Marke-tRoad #1938 right of way line;. . THENCE North 30 degrees 37 minutes East, 320.0 feet to th~p1ace of 'begi nili,;g .,.. and containing 3.385 acres of. land. . (Träct 3) . . ALL that certain tract or parcel of land being part of Tract.3-B, Brentwood . Estates, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-97, Page 31, Deed Records~ Tarrant County, Texas, and being f:urther described by metes and bounds as follows: . . . BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Tract 3-B, said point being in the Easterly right of ,way line of Fann-to-Market Road '#1938 (Davis Blvd.) , I . . . . . /' .. to,' -.. '. ,.. __ ..'_r___._'--"__""'~_.'.___">O--''-______ ___._...,........._.___.. ._ ___~..~._._~.,.,.~.___~ .__... ,- ------.~-- -~.--- '. - . -'- ~_.._.....~. ~.'R____~_~·_ ...._.__..~,. -~_._~--~---......_.._,--------_.~- ~----'.'~."'-------'~'._----""'-----'-"" -- - Page 2 THENCE South 59 degrees 23 minutes East, 219.74 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 770.66 feet; THENCE Southeasterly with said curve an arc length of 233.46 feet to a point; \ . THENCE South 98.88 feet to a point; THENCE South 30 degrees 37 minutes West~· 450.0 feet to a point; , THENCE North 59 degrees 23 minutes West, 500.0 feet to a point in said Fann-to- Market #1938 right of way line~ ' THENCE North 30 degrees 37 minutes East, 500.0 feet to the place of beginning and containing 5.7918 acres of land. (Tract 7) All ,that certain tract or parcel of land being part of Tract 4-A, Brentwood Estates, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-97, Page 31, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: . BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Tract 4-A, said point being in the Westerly right of way line of Fann-to-Market #1938 (Davis Blvd.); THENCE South 30 degrees 37 minutes West, 576.97 feet with said right of way line to, a point; THENCE North 59 degrees 23 minutes West, 120.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 86 degrees 46 minutes 30 seconds West, 115.0 feet to a point; THENCE North 15 degrees 55 minutes 16 seconds West, 115.0 feet to a point; THENCE North 0 degrees 29 minutes East, 565.03 feet to a point on a Southeasterly curve whose center poipt bears South 11 degrees 06 minutes 43 seconds West, 1064.82 feet; THENCE Southeasterly with said curve through a central angle of 19 degrees 30 minutes 17 ,seconds an arc length of 362.49 feet;. THENCE South 59 degrees 23 minutes East, 233.70 feet to the place of beginning and containing 5.953 acres of land~ (Tract 8) ALL that certain tract or parcel of land being Tract 4-B, Brentwood Estates, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-97, Page 31, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes· and bounds as follows: . BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Tract 4-B, said point being in the Westerly right of way line of Farm-to-Market Road #1938 (Davis Blvd.); , , .. -" ---.---- . ,. - ----, -,- .,.- , _. -- - ....._-~-_.._.--. ..__.._~._--_._,- ...., .. ..---~ __ ft.._. 1__.~.._ .. .'. ·Pa~ '3 .. .,~. ,;,.. . ~ ~. . ' - . . THENCE South 30 degrees 37 minutes West, 249.73 feet with said right of way .\" .. line ~p ·ð· poi nt; . . . . . - ..' - . THENCE Nórth 59 d~rees 23 minut~s West, 233.70 feet to.·the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 1144.82 feet; . . . ': . ~. ~. . .. . ....~ . ..., ... .... . .. . . .THENCENorthwesterly with said curve an arc length of 234.80 fee,t to a.point;. . ", (. . .. - . ~ :. . THENCE South 89 d~rees 46 ~inutes East~ 541.19 feet to, the place ofLb~fming.·. and'containing1.~52~cr,es.of.lat1d.. '" . ,':,~.. Thi. Droperty is a'pproximiltøly 16 acr~located on the south side of Shady . . Grove Üoadat the 1 nters~cti on of Fann.;.to-r<'.arke:t Road #1938 (Davi s ,Blvd.) ~ '. " . ~. ....:--.. o. ,_, .." .. - ¡ II ~~ 'JUNE' .. I . BY THE PlANNING AltO. ZONIlCGaJIIISSIOITHIS'. 26th, ,... . DAY .~. ... ¡9l3Q- , ',. . . '.' . :... ......; ..' '""';. .. . '''0 CHA~~j¡I~Mo~$ION e 'C,j ~ ' . S£tRf:l~ING __m -----~--- -----ISSIOH . . . . . '. BE IT. ORDAINED 'BY THE CITY COUNCIL 'OF THE CITY· OF NOImf RICHLNtD HILLS ACTt,., IN REGUlAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO... PI ... .. IS HEREBY" REZONED . . .' . .' . . . . THIS'" . DAY ,OF' .. - -\ JÞ MAYOR DICIC· FARAH. . . CITY OF· NORTH RICIUIIO'HIJ4.S:... . . o ". ... . '.* \ AntsY: . ,.' .... , . . ,'èm SECRETARY JEANE. rE MOORE . '.... CITY OF· NORTH RIOILAND HIllS . .' 0 FORM AND LEGAl ITV' ". . . \ ~.: C OR . CIn OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS e '. j- .(' .. ~,;.:...-.....~- .._--...,---..~ ......---...----...........- ""'-" -..... ---. '-, .._---.. .---- ". ':'{ . g . . ". or . e ORDINANCE· NO. '843 AN, ,ORDINMCE REZONING PROPERTY. IN ACCORDMŒ . , WITH· ARTIa.£ XXIX CHANGES AND AMEHII£NTS., . S£CTI(IIt 1 OF ORDIIWtCE 1179. ION.INS OROlNAHCE OF 'THE ,CITY: OF IIOITH' R1CHlAND HIllS~ 1JXAS.'.. . . PASSED, APPROVED. MDADOPTED:U TH£'PL.MHlltG ANoZCIIIll6.CCIIIlSSIOft MOM CITY COIItCIL OF' TH£ cm OF· ftORTKRICMI.MO HILLS. NOYÐI1ER 13. '19J7. AS _D,' JANUARY, .27. 1975 , , . · AfTER APPROPRIATE '"NOTICE AID' PUBLIC HiMnt& THE FoLLCliING, RECØllEJUaATIèJe IS StMImD TØ THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE cln OF NORTK RtCfUNO HILLS BY :ræ PlAMING MD ZŒttN6aIlUSSICII~' _ . R£SCI.VEDthat on cu.. No. PI . 'ßQ~2~ the foll·oWI.", descr1b1d. ~iv sha11: . . móned fl'Oli, Aq ri cult ù foe ' : . " . : " ' ,. , " ',... · , , . ': ' '" '0; .. .' . to . . Loca I- Reta 1 r . . . . . , '. . .' , , : ' , ':.,',: ' . . .' . , , . . , , . ,..' . '.' , , , ,... '" ~ ~ .,.". . , , . . ,. .. , I (Tract 1) . . . ALL 'that certain tract or, parcel of land being part of Tract 3-A!tBrentwood Estates!t North Richla~d Hills!t Tarrant CountY!tTexas as recorded in Volume' 388-97!t Page 31»' Deed Records» Tarrant County» Texas and being further described by 'metes and bounds ås follows: ' " . .. ~ . . ' ,'\ . . f' e BEGINNING at the' most Easterly Northeast corner of said Tract 2-A; said point being in,the Westerly right. of way line of Precinct Line ~oad; . THENCE South Z degrees 43 minutes West» 18~.g3 feet with said Precinct Line . · Road'right of way line ~o a point; , THENCE West 26.80 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 1056.22 feet; ',',~ ' , , . THENCE Northwesterly with said curve an arc length of 284.76 feet toa pòint; THENCE North 0 degrees 14 minutes' Easts 144.73 feet tc? a. point;. , , .. - ~ .' .' . , :' 't, '_~'. . THENCE North '89 degrees 40 minutes East» 316.30 feet to the placfof b,eginning and contai,..ing 1.236 acres ,9f land. . .. . ,. -. . . . .. '\ .e ¡ , I' . . , .' : ·påg~ ' 2 ...... -. ;... .' - ~ .' . .. .. - , . . , . . 1 . . '\.. .'. : . , . , . ..-, '.'.. .; . ".~. . '; ;, " .. ~ . . ..' . - " ,. , t. ~ .", , . ~ ' . . .-.~ ",I. .":-' ~,' , . , . '. . .... . ' . . . . . . . This pråperty is located· on the west side of Precinct ~ip~ RO'a~' just sQutl,. , of Shady Grove Bapti st Church. .' . .'.., .' . . . . '.:' .' "'" . . .., , . . ' ... '. . .... ....4'.. " . .' . -'~..- ... ..11 -.1, :~ . . . ' BY THE PlANNING AND, Zci4INGctJ1MISSIOftTHIS JUNE. 1980. . . 26th, .: ' 'MY'OF ... . .. t .. . . ~ ' : . .' ' ~." .~. '. :. C~ pLÅ~ìH6 AH~ISsIÓN ':..... . WOv1Avv IZ " . SECRETARY PLANHINGAN- -'- - SSION . , - . . . , . . BE ITOROAINED 'BY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITtOf NORTH RIaK.AtcD HILLS ACT!. IN REGUlAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO., PI···. Rn-?1 IS HEREBY REZON~D ' . L ~ 1 ß ~ · ~ .. ..;....... .. ..., ... THIS . 15th· DAY '.3f S:p~:mb~r, '980 , ...... .. ....- , .. MAYOR DICK· FARM ~ CITY Of NORTH RICHlMD 'HIL!$:,' -" .... . " ". -. . ,'em stCREtARY JEMÉT [to MOORE '. . .': CITY Of NORTH RICHLAND HIllS . - .. . ' . ArnsT: JÞ . . . . .. .. . . . APPROVED AS TO FO'" AKD LEGAlITY' \.:'" .', ,. . --~ ':~. ... / ... . ~ .. . .'-' ~&. ,:' .. .,,-- :.::.'-'~ ~~ --.-.......--------- ---....--..........--=. ._. ~ ....,:.':'......., or I"",,~-." .'1..:;.1' ~.. .~,..,~.. L, ... ..,. J~' . ." .. ... .' ~ ~.. ~ ;~..~:,'.:;~:' " ;- ..:.....:. ¡ :~~:i.. '.~-;:,:. i~:;--: DATE: 2-18-81 SUBJECT: Perma-Steel Construction DEPARTMENT: City Manager BACKGROUND: As discussed in Council work session on Feb. 2. and Council meeting of Feb. 9, Mr. Bob Ash needs decision if he-may proceed with construction of Single-family and Multi-family homes using unique construction methods which were briefed to the Council. As instructed by the Council, 16 property owners were notified in writing of Mr. Ash's intent to vary from the Brick Ordinance (attached) and construct Multi-family dwellings in the College Hills Addition. In addition 4 citizens were personally visited by the city staff for their comments. The following is alsummary of their comments: Mr. Wade, Fort Worth Christian - had no negative comments. Mrs. Perkins, No negative comments - do not necessarily want apartments but had no obejctions to this particular type - rather liked this design. (OVER) CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny permission to construct homes using perma-steel construction. • BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO . ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A Lfr ,-, -~ ¡.::,: .p.-~' r"""" ~~ -..... ,- r:' ...-'-.'- 1" , . I ~. ,... I .... ,,'., . -'" ... - _.. "~...,.. ,,~ ~ _.... .. t' . . ' _.... .w ~. , , " . '. 1;"' ~'..- I . , \ ' .'" ..-- ..;. ,_. r :" -~ ,. ...1 ",:' .!~~:.,. f JÞ Mrs-.. Bi'S8ers- - Did not have any obì*,ctions. Mrs-. Sparkman .... Did notwàn~ them. Very opposed. One property owner~ .Mrs. Stevens~ objected in written form~ see attached letter. ',t.fr., Ash will be pres'ent. Photographs of the Haltom City homes are attached. .. .. ...... .'~ ..... ,,, . ..... -~ ~. .. r-o ,- . . . City of JX.ðrth Richland Hills, Texas e February 13, 1981 Dear Property Owner; The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills will meet February 23, 1981 at 7:30 p, M. at the Cit.}' Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, to hear and detenmine the application of Bob Ash, Penna Steel Structures, Inc., to vary frorll the Brick Ordinance #784 and be allowed to' build quadruplexes on Lots 17, 18, & 19, Block 4, College Hill Addition. . This property is located at the southeast corner of Abbott Ave. and College Circle. All interested parties are invited to attend and to voice their views on this matter. Sincerely, --L~ /J!HAd Jeanette Moore 'p~s~ There is ,a rendering available for viewing in the Planning and Zoning Department. we (817) 281¡0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLANO HilLS, TEXAS 76118 #' . ~~. - # , - , ~ . ' e ORDINANCE NO. 650 BE IT ORDAINED BY TriE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF· NORTH RICHLANO HILLS, TEXAS, that Ordinance No. 129, heretofore passed and adopted on December 14, 1964, be amended as follows: ARTICLE I shall be amended by deleting the first sentence thereof and sub- stituting the following.; liThe Southern Standard Building Code, 1960~61 Revision, together with all amendments, revisions and additions thereto,. to date hereof, and expressly including the197~2 Revision, a copy of which shall be maintained on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of North RichlandHills, -Texas, is hereby adopted and designated as the Building Code of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, the same as if such code, amendments, revisions and addi·tions were copied at length herein, subject, however, to the fOllowing om~i'ssion~, amendments and additi~ns. II ARTICLE I shall be further amended by deleting "Section 1.01vl& therefrom and substituting therefor, ~he following: "Section 1.01 v. All multi-family, two famHy and one family dwellings shall have exterior walls constructed of 75% brick, stone, or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. Exterior wall shall mean that exposed portion of the building from the foundation up to the ceiling line of the first floor of the building. ARTICLE IV shall be amended by adding the following section: "Section 4.01 a. ' Sidewalks shall be installed on both sides of all Collectór and Thoroughfare Streets, The s.idewalks shall be four (4t) foot in width and where sidewalks intersect qt a comer the entire radius shall be part of the sidewalk. Other specifications for sidewalks s~ll be as specified by the City Engineers. . Sidewalk installation shall start at the property-line and extend four (4t) feet toNiIrd the street. In subdivisions where asphalt or concrete parking lots are allONed to be extended to the street, sidewl ks shall be installed as stipulated above.· Passage of th;s Ord·inance repeals. Ordinance 478. e PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th day of January , 1977. . .~ ¡ . t' \ ; J ; . ' .,"~~"lj "?;, tli~rny~~ TCIII E~ Newlån, Ma r , e , , .. .) ~, ~ * . - 1 • 4, -A *Mt •� 'h •_ 4r ' `� \.w'g 7 tit ■i _ • �;w `, i tic- 4.. .4 y -ham `}• . , _ w ° ems• - _: "...■ lk , :,.,,,k .. ,..„, V � Iy�1yR_� %1. ti a R . . , . . _ , . , . 7 4�� R-,(", ,,., „.i, , . kikie' ‘....-.. ,.,''-11164 111410t' l 1 . i 0 . \. i it I 4 A i t . i-6 ''' . , ` 1 i I . , - ' )- \, , \\ t. , ... ,, \ , (Iiii i ' y , 1i y .L''....r IIMP\114011tki:',tikiriL 11111 .,*.14.., I lot ifjp. --,,,,,iire,--;-,4,1 141 ,.. %.,,..... i it)A ' '- I . i .01,,,aorditot,„,.. .:■,:t1/4-1i.,::,, .. , t - 4...!/"...■ .4 i'fi, , , ' 'a4 .4. ,,.. , .fammi\r,...,r'' ,, , , . ,.. ...id its . : •t,, », . . 0...._ . , , ,114;.,. ,.„-riPPIA„,1 1 1 . We- , . ..: • 1 I iii ±a 4 4* / ' " '' �MU�' I1I1h1 '' � e - .)� ' v !1 j \ i as \ 4) . ' .; .4 fir► "��' (\` '4. ,., ...... . ...., l•11/ i PI 1 lc _, .'..-_* / ., ,.. . 'Allit ori --426:4gps i , :\ _ _ _ . , i r— 1 l . , . ..., ! _ _ _ - f 4 • IMP laiffill r MN Imo : + 1 is 4 ,l'.', —rani IIIIIIIII alIM:�� ...MN, a is 7 • mss.. ' f.4 - 1 a � 4' �{ R al II r $1,. . G r+ y ti } ., f' `N - DATE: 2-19-81 . SUBJECT: Section 10.4 Parker-Crostol'] Assocìat~sr Rp,qIJP'\ting VarTi'lnre from Qrdil1anc~'650' DEPARTMENT: City Manager BACKGROUND: This firm requests a variance from our ordinance (attached) . . requiring 75% brick~ -' They would like to build a building with. wood or inexpenSive outside building material for the exterior. Comments 1) The indicatipn ~ is stil rfor a. temporary but]~ing not ,a permanent structure and if a temporary, how long. 2) Sprinkling a building to meet the National Fire Standards, by ~" bricking 75%. ' which we are governed, the cost would cöme close to that of ~ ,I Fire Hazard The Fire Chief and Code Enforcement Officer request d~nialr I concur. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: l' BUDGETED ITEM:' YES N/ A . NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A, ------------------------------------------~------------------------------------ I ~;., ¡.: ", (e . i.. \e DAT .\ \ ..:; SUBJECT: Variarice from Building Code DEPARTMENT: Building ,Official: Bill Rice BACKGROUND: According to the Building Codes~·buildings housing hospital personnel' must.be type occupancy I-I type'V-l br co~truction which requires noncombustible~ materia1 and is restricted to masonry, steel, plus 1 hr. fire rated construction interior. To våryfram these requirements for'temporary'construction for ,hospital housing not only would be contrary ,to building codes but also the Fire Code and' the Zoning Ordinance which 'states buildings in this zaneta be masonry or st~el construction for fire ratings. ,If allowed to build for temporary 'housing; the city would later have to demand ~hat structure is nonconforcdng and have it torn down and probl~ would exis~. Recol1l11end disapproval CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Appr~~~r~~var~ance , .~4/¡L .BUDGETED ITEM: ': YES NO X , ~ * -- ~ ~ ACCOUNT NUMBER':, : . ----------~-----------------------------------------~----,--------------------- 6 ~, . . .' . ~ . -, ..,J# PARKER · CROSTON ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS · ENGINEERS · PLANNERS P. O. BOX 1927 · 3108 w. 6th St. · FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76101 · (817) 332-8464 February 13, 1981 Mr. Chuck Williams, City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. o. Box 18609 Fort Worth, TX 76118 Dear Mr. Williams: ·1 As the architects for the new Schick Shadel Hospital expansion program we have been told that we may not move on site or build any temporary structure which houses personnel. The City Building Inspection Department has been very helpful with most of our needs and is more thân willing to help us work through this or any other bu~lding related problem. However, we have been told that the City of North Richland Hills requires anon-combustible exterior covering on all buildings, which house hospital personnel, which is restricted to brick. steer-or rock, plus a one-hour fire rated interior wàrr. I would very much ~eclate the opportunity to discuss this wittt the Council and request a possible waiver of this requirement at your next Council meeting. ~~w:-;; I would like to proposes is a wood or other inexpensive building ~ material exterior, with a o~e-hour rated interior wall that is sprinklered. Since this building would only be an interim expansion measure until the new facility is compl,te, we feel that the estimated expense of building a brick veneer building is an unrecoupable cost and hardship for the hospital. Than you for your consideration and I will look forward to hearing frOB you. Very truly yours, PA1UŒR~STON ASSOC~S ~,. /~;-/ .¡' . . .,,- '/ ')' /// /. / " './ n~>'AIA . DB:njh . cc:Mr. Jim Roberts, Assistant Administrator Schick Shadel Hospital 4101 Frawley Drive Fort Worth, TX 76118 .-.'..--....... - _..-...~--:._--.._-_..__.._,--,,,.- --~. --,.--------......-...- -;~..._~_...._.-----_..._.,._-.._......__._- ~.....-....... -...-.-....-.......-....-.....". ..~, _.'._.---_....--~.--....---_._~----_.....-,-,,----- --~-. --., --.....-- '----.-.. ..--..-.....--- ---.- ,- ---- ----.. . .-.-.--.---..-...... -.-. ...--...........--..... -- """ .- ......... -~ ..----.'--. .,.'..._. '__"C_ . ORDINANCE NO. 650 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, that Ordinance No. 129, heretofore passed and adopted on December 14, 1964, be amended as follows: ARTICLE I shall be amended by deleting the first sentence thereof and sub- sti tuting the fo1lowi ng.; liThe Southern Standard Building Code, 1960-61 Revision, together with all amend~nts, revisions and additions thereto,. to date hereof, and exp~ssly including the 1971-72 Revision, a copy of which shall be maintained on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of North Rich1and Hills, ·Texas, is hereby adopted and designated as the Building Code of the City of North Ri.ch1and Hills, Texas, the same as if such code, amend~nts, revisions and additions were copied at length herein, subject, however, to the fOllowing omissions, amendments and additions. II ARTICLE I shall be further a~nded by deleting "Section 1.0lv" therefrom and substituting therefor, the fOllowing: "Section 1.01 . v. All multi-family, two family and one family dwellings shall have exterior walls constructed of 75% brick, stone, or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. Exterior wall shall ~an that exposed portion of the bUilding from the foundation up to the ceiling line of the first floor of the bUilding. ARTICLE IV shall be a~nded by adding the fOllowing section: "Section 4.01 a. Sidewalks shall be installed on both sides of all Collector and Thoroughfare Streets. The s.idewa1ks shall be four (41) foot in width and where sidewalks intersect ~ a corner the entire radius shall be part of the sidewalk. Other specifications for sidewalks shall be as specified by the City Engineers. Sidewalk installation shall start at the property line and extend four (41) feet toward the street. In subdivisions where asphalt or concrete parking lots are allowed to be extended to the street, sidewalks shall be installed as stipulated above." Passage of this Ordinance repeals Ordinance 478. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th day of January , 1977. \ t . , ~,K/ C~ ~/¥/ Tom E. Newman, Ma or '. . .'" DATE: 2-19-81 Wrecker Service Rates (New Ordinanc~) SUBJECT: e DEPARTMENT: Police Department BACKGROUND: The cost of doing business ~ncreases every year for the wrecker companies. An example of these increases over the past five (5) yea,rs includes: Gasoline· Costs: ).976 - Regular Gas 57¢ gallon 1978 - Regular Gas - 63¢ ,gallon 1981 - Regular Gas - $1.35 gallon (Expected increase to $1.50 gallon by the end of this year). Fuel costs have increased by 136% since 1976. (57¢ gallon,vs. $1.35 gallon) ~e other Cas ts': Since 1976: continued next page CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve new or4inanc~. ., BUDGETED ITEM:' YES' NO X ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A ----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-- e ~~. " ,. .. ..' - '. -. - - -, . - ... ., ~ .. . . . - .' . . '.. .' - . . - - - ~ - - -- -. .-. -,...._- ....... . -----. _.~ ~'- - --.'--..--". ....._'_....._.--_....~ ·_411··....____......_ e It e Repairs have increased 40% Cost of Wreckers have increased ,45% Wages have increased 30% The current approved basic wrecker weekday towing fee is the same that was in effect in 1976 ($25.00). In 1978, the base charge for nights, weekends and hOlidays was increased from $27.50 to $30.00. With the increased cost of doing business since 1976, the wrecker companies are finding it difficult to earn a fair profit from their operation. Therefore, the attached ordinance provides for the fOllowing: (1) Increase basic fee for weekdays from $25.00 to $32.50 (up 30%) (2) Increase basic night, weekends, and holiday fee from $30.00 to $37.50 (up 25%) A survey of area cities' current fees shows the following: Day Nights, Weekends, Holidays 1. Fort W9rth $35.00 $35.00 2. Dallas 30.00 30.00 3. Euless 30.00 30.00 1 4. Hurst 30.00 30.00 asking for an 5. Haltom, City 30.00 30.00 increase this year. 6. Arlington 32.50 37.50 1 e . e Þ' e I . Based on this information, the requested increases in the towing fees are recommended. The current Wrecker Ordinance #778 has other changes that were needed and those portions of the ordinance where changes have been made are indicated in the margin. I' . -~ --- ~.---- -:~~-- -~! .---.... ~..--.... .... . ~...~ or· _,.... _"__ .' - e , / ORDll~ANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A WRECKER ROTATION LIST; REQUIRING A PERMIT FOR WRECKER COMPANIES TO BE PLACED ON THE ROTATION LIST; SETTING FORTH RULES AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE OPERATION OF SUCH WRECKER COMPANIES; ESTABLISHING WRECKER PERMIT FEE; ESTABLISHING RATES AND THE HOURS OF AVAILABILITY FOR RECLAIM BY THE VEHICLE'S O\iNER; PROVIDING FOR THE INDEFINITE SUSPENSION OF WRECKER SERVICE PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OR OPERATING WITHOUT A VALID PERMIT; AND DECLARING AN E~ŒRGENCY . BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas: I. The following terms, where used in this ordinance, shall have the meaning and effect hereinafter set forth. 1. Wrecker Vehicles: Any motor vehicle used systematically or regularly as a tow vehicle for another motor vehicle. 2. Damaged Motor Vehicles: Any motor vehicle inoperative as a result of a collision or otherwise. 3. Abandoned Motor Vehicles: Any motor vehicle left unattended on a public street or other public property for a period in excess of forty-eight (48) hours. 4. Stored Vehicles: Any vehicle held for safekeeping by licensed wrecker company. II. No person, firm, or partnership corporation shall be placed on the wrecker rotation list for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, unless they possess a current wrecker service permit from the City, and approved to operate same through the Chief of Police. The wrecker rotation list shall be limited to four (4) qualified and approved wrecker services. -......... III. All applicants for wrecker service permit must furnish the Chief of Police with the following: 1. A written application for each wrecker stating the location of applicant's storage facilities where all damaged, inoperative and abandoned vehicles will be taken for safekeeping. 2. All wrecker companies shall carry insurance in limits of not less than the following sums and shall furnish to the Chief of Police a copy of their insurance policy indicating the coverages and amounts: - tit , See. 1 C 6. [ 7. (a) Bodily Injury Liability: $10,000 for each person; $20,000 for each accident. (b) Property Damage: $10,000 for each wrecker vehicle. 3. The written application for a wreckèr service permit shall state the names, drivers license numbers, addresses, and telephone numbers of those persons who will operate appli- cant's storage area. All of the required information must be kept current, showing all additions and/or deletions to the approved applications on file with the City. L 4. The written application for a wrecker service permit must contain a statement of applicant's fees for towing and storage. 5. The Chief of Police shall issue said permits to all appli- cants complying with the provisions of this ordinance after the applications have been completed and filed in his office, the permit fees paid, and after the Chief of Police or his duly authorized representative has inspected each such wrecker and determined that the wrecker complies with the following minimum requirements: (a) Each wrecker shall not be less than one ton in size. (b) Each wrecker shall be equipped with a power take-off winch, winch line and boom, with a factory rated capa- city of not less than 5,000 pounds. (c) Each wrecker shall carry as standard equipment a tow bar, safety chains, a fire extinguisher, wrecker bar, broom, axe, shovel, flags, flares, and scotch blocks. (d) Each wrecker shall have inscribed on each side thereof in letters not less than three inches in height the name and address of the company. (e) Each wrecker shall be radio equipped for communications with the North Richland Hills Police Department. Such wrecker service permit fee shall be $10.00 for each wrecker on which a permit is desired. All permits issued shall expire on December 31 of the year in which they were issued. All wrecker permits shall be visibly displayed on the inside lower right corner of the windshield of each wrecker operated wi·thin the Ci ty. IV. All wrecker companies desiring to be called for wrecker service by the City Police Department shall request in writing to be placed on the wrecker rotation list maintained by the Pol~ce Department and in addition to meeting the above requirements shall cerfity that all cars towed from within the city limits of North Richland Hills shall be stored in facilities located in the City of North Richland Hills or any other such location agreed upon by the owner/driver of the vehicle and the wrecker company. All suc~ wrecker company storage facilities shall be located in the City of North Richland Hills or within òne (1) mile of the City Limits of North Richland Hills. Such storage facilities located in North Rich1and Hi11S/~¡ßb~~~~roper~ L zoned area.-...!l~ ~§.~rage facilities sha1JA'I:>e^eñ'2Lß'!;'etT'Dr aT'''''' S" permanent ~ fence,.. _sllary "'-qg!Ø5 "81-:<'1 t.tn.n;! (u......""t-~r w8sistaat rcdwood, @&?.,..,., QJ:: .equal>lnot less than ~h. t6r~ ~a R8i8Àt fr9m all. direcr;~DIL_ ¿ Sec. 2 Wrecker companies desiring to be placed on the wrecker rotation list shall carry Garage Keepers Extra Legal liability insurance to cover the maximum number of customers; automobiles stored for damage due to fire, explosion, theft, riot, vandalism and collision. A cash escrow deposit in the amount of $5,000.00 or an acceptable fidelity bond in the amount of $5,000.00 insuring and nameing the City of North Richland Hills as beneficiary against physical damage loss to stored vehicles, theft of stored vehicles or any part thereof, or theft of contents of stored vehicles may be furnished in lieu of Garage Keepers liability insurance. - e Sec. 3 The wrecker rotation list shall be used for all vehicles on which a pull is requested by the North Richland Hills Police Department. Sec. 1 Sec. 2 e v. When a police officer investigation of an accident determines that any vehicle which has been involved in a collision or accident is unable to proceed safely under it's own power, or when the owner thereof is ~~~.ca!"!:1 unable to drive such vehicle, the officer sahlI request the owner to designate the wrecker company the owner desires to remove the vehicle. When the owner has designated the wrecker company desired, the police officer shall communicate the fact immediately to Police Department Headquarters, and it shall be the duty of the dispatcher receiv- ing such information at headquarters to call the designated company. In the event the owner of the vehicle involved in an accident or collision is physically unable to designate the wrecker company desired, or refused to designate one the investigating officer shall communicate that fact immediately to Police Department Headquarters. The Police Department shall maintain a wrecker rotation list in alphabetical order which shall contain the names and addresses of each wrecker service company that complies with the provisions of Article III of this ordinance e in order that siad company might be called upon for wrecker service by the Police Department. The police officer receiving a call at the Police Headquarters for wrecker service shall call the first wrecker company on the list to tow the disabled vehicle or move the same from the public streets of the city~ After the company at the top of the list received a call then the company's name shall be plåced at the bottom of the list and the next company shall be moved to the top of the list and it shall receive calls. This process shall be repeated until each company providing wrecker service under the provisions of this ordinance has received calls. The Police Department shall notify each wrecker company in sufficient time prior to its rendering said wrecker service in order that the company might adequately provide the necessary men and equipment to answer said calls. Sec. 3 In the event a wrecker service company is requested by the Police Department to make a call and the company agrees to make said call then the company shall proceed immediately to the scene where it is directed and shall be given a reasonable length of time in which to reach said location. If the wrecker service company answering said call has not reached said location with- in a reasonable length of time then the officer at the scene may proceed to call the next wrecker service company on the list and that company shall have priority over that particular call. In the event that the wrecker service company called fails to comply with the provisions of the ordinance by proceeding to the desig- nated place within the time specified above then this wrecker service company shall be removed from the top of the list and placed at the bottom of the list. e VI. All wrecker companies on the wrecker rotation list which are called for wrecker service by the North Richland Hills Police Department shall comply with the following schedule of rates and the hours of avail- ability for reclaim by the vehicle's owners. [1. Base charge for weekdays (8 AM to 5:30 PM) $32.50 ~ 2. Base charge for nights, weekends, and holidays $37.50 ;- 3. Use of dollies $15.00 4. Use of winch $12.50 5. Drop drive shaft $ 6.00 6. Stand-by time (after initial 15 min.) per hour $15.00 e 7. Vehicles of 1 ton and greater and up to 3 tons $35.00 8. Vehicles in excess of 3 tons $50.00 e e e Vehicles need not be released except during the hours of 8 AM to 5:30 PM on week days and 8 AJI to 12 noon on Saturdays. VII. No damaged or inoperative motor vehicle or trailer shall be re- moved by the owner or a wrecker service company from the scene of a collision or vehicle accident without notification to the North Rich1and Hills Police Department. VIII. No person shall drive a wrecker to or near the scene of an accident within the City of North Richland Hills unless such person has be~n called to the scene by the owner of the vehicle or his authorized representative or by the Police Department. Each such wrecker operator, when called by the owner of a disabled vehicle or his authorized representative, shall notify the Police Dispatcher before proceeding to the scene of the disabled vehicle. IX. Solicitation of Wrecker Business Progibited - No persons shall solicit any wrecker business in any manner, directly or indirectly, on the streets of North Richland Hills at or near the scene of an accident or of wrecked or diabled vehicles. X. Debris at Accident Scene to be Removed - Each wrecker company called to the scene of an accident shall completely remove from the street all resulting wreckage or debris, including all broken glass, before leav- ing the site. XI. No employee of the City of North Richland Hills shall recommend to any person, directly or indirectly, either by word, gesture, sign or otherwise, the name of any particular person or firm engaged in the wrecker business, nor shall any city employee influence or attempt to influence in any manner a decision of a person in choosing or selecting a wrecker operator. XII. The Chief of Police or his authorized representative, shall en- force this ordinance and make such inspection of facilities as deemed necessary. Any variance from the provisions of this ordinance must be approved in advance in writing by the Chief of Police. XIII. Sec. 1 The Chief of Police may, subject to the approval of the City Manager, indefinitely su~ the wrecker service permit issued to any company or any oriãlI wreckers belonging to the company for violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance. Sec. 2 Any person whose permit has been suspended may file an appeal to the City Council. The City Council shall have authority upon the hearing of the appeal to reverse, vacate or modify the suspension. e XIV. All wreckers shall be driven at posted speeds unless otherwis~ directed by the officer in charge at the scene of the accident. xv . The wrecker company shall furnish the North Richland Hills Police Department with the description and registeration number of any vehicles which the company has been unable to locate the owner. This information shall be furnished within ten days from the date the company took custody of the vehicle. XVI. If the initial request for a pull comes from the North Richland Hills Police Department, no release shall be granted without authorization from the North Richland Hills Police Department. This provision shall not apply to pulls at owner's request which are relayed to the wrecker company by the Police Department. The police dispatcher shall inform the wrecker company whether a pull is owner's request or Police Department request. e XVII. Any person, firm or corporation or agent who shall operate a wrecker without a permit or while a permit is under suspension is in violation of this ordinance, shall upon conviction in the Court of Juris- diction for any such violation be punished by a fine of not more than TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00). XVIII. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this code. XIX. All ordinances and parts of ordinancws in conflict herewith, shall be, and the same are hereby repealed. xx. e The fact that it is to the best interest of the City and its inhabitants, constitutes a measure for immediate preservation of the public peace, property, health, and safety of the City and i~s inhabitants, and creates an emergency requiring this ordinance be effective from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. · c e e e I" PASSED AND APPROVED this day of t 19_ ATTEST: City Secretary - Jeanette Moore APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY AND FORM: City Attorney - Rex McEntire To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records