Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1981-07-27 Agendas JULY 27, 1981 . :-u ì~ the Meet; ng CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HIllS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA July 27, 1981 · at 7:30 p.m.t in the City Hall. 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER 1. 2. ITEM PRE COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. ACTION TAKEN ------,~' ' COUNCIL - 7:30 P.M. .,~~ 1. Call to Order 2 . Ro 11 Ca 11 A rov~l of Minutes Re u1ar Meetin Gk{t:;. ~~:'.;; ~~:? - i1-/~¡ /) f~J'(: ~>¡t/t.L~u,.f.T- PLANNING & ZONING - APPEAL HEARING onsideration of PS 81-33 Re uest of S. Brooks for Final Plat of Lot 1, k 1 Brooks 'Additio ¡~, / l /:., "'\ " """~---~-~~~ It "~'I.. ~ . . . . .' / '7 I Agenda Page 2 CITY OF NORTH RfCHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 'f(Jt· the Meeting July 27, 1981 . t at 7:30 p.m.. in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. ITE~1 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING PZ 81-23, . Request of Northeast Construct· on Company to rezone Lots 14 thru 30, Block 20, Holiday West Addition, Section 3, from IF~9 to·2F-9. ACTION TAKEN Consideration of Ordinance for PZ ,l . /,){ Consideration of Appointment of Mrs. Nanc Gumm to Cable TV Advisory Cm i tee. BLIC·HEARING - Consideration of i d 1980-81 Revenue Sharing Consideration of. Pa ment to Austin Road Com an in the amount of $18,221~85 Booth Cal10wa Road .... -1P_. .it.1:?:en Presentation 17. Ma oris Pre~entation ~ . 18. Ad·ournment POST COUNCIL (CLOSED) PERSONNEL. ACTION Ai qty — 4-7 ,e•2att �. .SA 9-57 02,0 — f ,25 A" 57sP3 , 5'� q�d "ds , 5,3 00 5997 e -S . Z42, ita54 , = tryi oficoegi OO R C. �Ni�y _ . REVISED REVENUE SHARING BUDGET ORIGINAL APPROVED BUDGET Fire Trucks (2) - Computer and Programming REVISED BUDGET - Balance from Previous Year - 1980-1981 Receipts - Fire Trucks (2) - Computer and Programming - Asphalt Lay Down Machine . .þ ,þ . $156,000.00 106,000.00 50,000.00 $185,000.00 9,000.00 17~ ,'000.00 107.,000. aD 62,000.00 16,000.00 $185,000.00 [Oe e ;/",. (.. . l Mr. Albin stated the property in question was originally designated as Lot 2, Block 4, owned by Folsom Investment. A portion of this property was sold in August of 1979. The lower portion of this particular property was developed by Bank of North Texas. Bank of North Texas was constructed on this property which had already been platted and there was no way the city could require them to replat. Mr. Albin stated he personally could not find anything in the ordinances ~ that would require a replat. Mr. Albin stated that in tnis case a portion of a lot that had already been platted was being built on and the city was given assurance by them and the developers that the southern portion of this piece of property was not going to be developed. Mr. Albin stated he understood that after Bank of North Texas was built, a portion was sold off by metes and bounds and the building that resulted was some time after the original platting. Mr. Albin stated the city had since added provisions in the Sub-division Ordinance that if a lot was platted and not developed within a period of four years after platting approval then they had to resubmit construction plans for engineering review. Mr. McEntire stated that if this happened prior to the ordinance being passed there was nothing the city could do about it. Councilman Wood asked if the loophole had been closed. Mr. Albin stated not entirely. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Albin if he had a recommendation for the staff to bring to the Council to close the loopholes. Mr. Albin stated that was a legal matter. Councilman Wood stated he would like to ask the Legal Department to close up some gaps in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. McEntire stated there was no problèm about this being zoned properly. Mayor Pro Tem Freeman asked if the property in question was platted and zoned properly. Mr. Albin replied yes. Motion to approve carried 4-0. July 13, 1981 Page 2 ~ Ie e 6. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas, to approve PS 81-32. Motion carried 4-0. 7. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve PS 81-34. Motion carried 4-0. 8. Mayor Pro Tern Freeman called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. Mr. Bob Allen, 8121 Odell, appeared before the Council. Mr. Allen stated industrial zoning would allow the manufacturing of almost anything and this property was located in the middle of a residential area. The property in question was about 100 yards from an elementary school, 1000 yards from a Junior High School and only about 200 yards from two churches. Mr. Allen stated the intersection of Davis and Main were already both congested. Mr. Allen stated that if you went down Davis, going northwest out of North Richland Hills you had to go up a hill and you could not see the intersection. There were no signs warning you about the schools and there were no sidewalks for the Junior High students that live in the north of where this property was located to travel on going to and from school. Mr. Allen stated it was mentioned at the last meeting that this property would not be good for anything else, but if it was good for any kind of bUilding, it was good for something besides industrial use. Mr. Allen stated that at the last Council meeting there was something mentioned about a Master Plan. Mr. Allen stated he had talked to his neighbors and no one seemed to know that a Master Plans for North Richland Hills existed or what it was. Mr. Allen stated that if he was in the middle of that Master Plan and it was going to become industrial he should be warned about it. Mr. Allen stated that in his opinion industrial was not good for the area. Mayor Pro Tern Freeman asked Mr. Allen if he had been contacted in regards to public meetings in his area on the Master Plan. July 13, 1981 Page 3 I, PLANNING & '- ZONING . PS 81-32, REQUEST SHOWBIZ PIZZA FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT BLOCK 25, CLEARVIEv ADDITION APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING _ PS 81-34, REQUEST 0 TENNECO FOR FINAL PLAT OF BLOCK 5, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING _ PUBLIC HEARING ~ RECONSIDERATION OF PZ 81-15, REQUEST 01 CURTIS MOORE AND B. R. FLORIES TO REZONE TRACT 2, ABSTRACT 1625, F. WOOD SURVEY AND TRACT 3, ABSTRACT 273, J.M. CROCKETT SURVEY FROM AGRICUL- . TURE TO INDUSTRIAL .~ ¡-- " _ Mr. Allen repl~ed no. Mr. Horvath advised there would be a meeting the 28th of July in that area. Mayor Pro Tern Freeman advised Mr. Allen to stay in contact with the City Staff and they could advise him about the meetings. Mayor Pro Tern Freeman stated the city would appreciate the citizens comments on the Master Plan. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Allen if he knew the property adjacent to the property in question was zoned industrial. Mr. Allen replied yes. Mr. Allen stated that it was mentioned that mini-warehouses would be built and if that was the case a commercial zoning could take care of it. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Allen what he felt the zoning should be. Mr. Allen stated he felt it should be residential, but the whole area was turning into commercial and industrial. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Allen if he agreed that the area was becoming industrial and commercial because of the highway and the railroad that have been there for a considerable lenth of time. Mr. Allen stated he agreed, but all it was doing was causing more congestion and problems for the students that go to the schools and the people that live there. Councilman Wood stated that if he was in the position of the owner he would be skeptical of the commercial zoning because it would be bordering on spot zoning. Councilman Wood stated his question was what was the highest and best use of the land. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Allen if he would be in agreement to having the property zoned Planned Development. Mr. Allen stated he would definitely agree to Planned Development before it went Industrial. Mrs. Barbara Dutton, 8204 Odell, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Dutton stated she would like to make a comment on the highest and best use for the property. Mrs. Dutton stated she tried twice to get her property zoned to commercial and was denied both times because the city said the best July 13, 1981 rage 4 e r e e use was residential. Mrs. Dutton stated her property abutted the property in question. Mayor Pro Tern Freeman asked Mrs. Dutton if her property was the last lot between the residential and Davis Boulevard. Mrs. Dutton stated her property was at the corner of Davis and Odell, on the south side of Odell and east of Davis. Councilman Wood asked Mrs. Dutton if her facility was the one operating as a garage. Mrs. Dutton replied yes. Councilman Wood asked Mrs. Dutton if she was not operating a local retail or commercial business in a residential area. Mrs. Dutton stated she was under non-conforming use and was operating under the grandfather clause. She stated she went to court to prove this. Councilman Wood stated he would question why they were discussing the highest and best use in a residential area since there were houses next door and across the street. Councilman Wood stated it was a mute question because Mrs. Dutton was operating a facility under the grandfather clause. Mrs. Dutton stated it was not her fault, she tried to get it zoned to commercial and was denied. Mayor Pro Tern Freeman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Dick Perkins, Teague, NaIl and Perkins, 210 West 6th, Fort Worth, representing Mr. B. R. Flories and Curtis Moore, appeared before the Council. Mr. Perkins stated he had asked for the reconsideration because of additional information on why his clients felt the property should be zoned industrial. Mr. Perkins showed the Council a scale of the land. Mr. Perkins stated he would like to comment on the Planned Development. Mr. Perkins stated their main objection to Planned Development was that because of the topography of the land there would be significant outlay of engineering and planning funds to produce a planned development of which there was no guarantee that it would be approved once it was completed. , July ~3~ 1981 Page 5 ~ Councilman Wood asked Mr. Perkins if there was any possibility for planned development and doing it in phases. Mr. Perkins asked Councilman Wood if he was talking about a Planned Development on the whole thing and then develop into phases or about a planned development by phase. Councilman Wood stated a planned development by phase, overall it would be a planned development and it would be presented in sections or phases. Mr. Perkins stated the way he understood the Zoning Ordinance if planned development was approved on this particular piece of property, all of the property would have to be planned development. Mr. Perkins stated they might get locked into something they could not live with. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Perkins if he had any ideas on a buffer zone next to the residential property. roe Mr. Perkins stated the city ordinance would require the developer to build a screening fence between the property in question and the Odell Street property. Mr. Perkins stated that due to the type of facility that was planned he did not feel there would be a problem on a buffer zone. Mr. Perkins stated the ordinance called for a six foot screening fence and they would be willing to put up an eight foot fence. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Perkins if he would discuss the basic' plan for the property. Mr. Perkins stated the plan would be essentially the same plan they had on the original preliminary for the lower half, the portion that was already zoned. Mr. Perkins stated that as far as the plan itself for the twenty-six acres, they planned to build small day type mini warehouses. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Perkins if he would agree to some type of building set-back; some type of green belt between the two opposing properties, if this request was approved. Mr. Perkins stated that in the original plan there was a sizeable distance between the properties because of the grade between the old north line and where the building would actually be with no driveway behind it. Mayor Pro Tem Freeman asked Mr. Perkins if that was a yes or a no on the green belt. Mr. Perkins stated they could put in a green belt. Mr. J. Byrant, 1412 West Magnolia, Fort Worth, Land Planner, 4IÞ appeared before the Council. July 13» 1981 Page 6 ~ ( I" ,e e Mr. Bryant stated the property in question could stand some care. Mr. Bryant stated there was a lot of trash there now. Mr. Bryant stated one thing he thought should be brought was that whatever was done on the property it would not be done overnight. Mr. Bryant stated if the request was approved it would change the tax structure and as far as he could see it would not do anything to the neighbors. Councilwoman Groves asked the staff to address the drainage situation. Mr. Albin stated that most of the drainage drained to the east. A portion of it did drain to the north to Odell and a portion drained to Davis. Mr. Albin stated he thought there was a drainage way across Odell that picked up Some of the run-off from the area that would have to be improved. Mr. Perkins stated that the property from Odell drained on to the property in question. Mr. Perkins stated there might be a small portion that got back on to Odell but because of what they would have to do in trimming the hill off would not effect the people that lived on Odell. Mr. Perkins stated they would actually be improving the drainage. Councilman Wood asked the City Attorney if stipulations could be put on a zoning case. Mr. McEntire stated yes. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Perkins that if the Council made a motion to approve this with the stipulation that a minimum of an eight foot fence on the north property line, a minimum of a 12 foot greenbelt area and driveway or street along the north boundary, would it be acceptable. Mr. Perkins stated that would be agreeable. Mildred Allen, 8217 Odell, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Allen stated that when it rained the water on the street was waist deep. Mrs. Allen stated that if the property in question was filled the street would become a river. Mr. Bob Allen, Odell Street, reappeared before the Council. Mr. Allen stated that Mr. Perkins had sta,ted that the land would not be big enough to manufacture anything toxic. Mr. Allen stated he had seen batteries manufactored in places with enough acid to eat up every house and car in the area. Mr. Allen stated he did not think the drainage would be a problem. Mr. Allen stated Mr. Perkins stated they wanted to put in mini warehouses, but did not have a definite plan for the future. Mr. Allen stated that with all the indifinite things in the area it was a possibility it was very impractical. July 13, 1981 Page '7 , r . - ì I I le Mr. Perkins stated that on the drainage he felt developing the property would not put anymore water on the adjoining property. Mr. Perkins stated that if anything they would be taking it off. Mr. Perkins stated they would be willing to deed restrict the property not to have toxic waste on the property. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tern Freeman closed the hearing. 9. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve PZ 81-15, Ordinance No. 907. Councilman Wood stated that due to the restrictions he would like to modify the motion. Councilman Hubbard withdrew his motion, Councilman Wood withdrew his second. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve PZ 81-15, Ordinance No. 907 with the fOllowing stipulations: A minimum of an eight foot site barring gence to be placed on the north boundary line, a minimum of a twelve foot green area between the fence and buildings and/or any other construction on the northern boundary, deed restrictions to be furnished by the land owner for the city's benefit restircting the property from any chemical companies and/or companies that create toxic waste. Councilman Hubbard stated he just recently attended one of the city's community meetings in the area and although it was not for this particular side of the highway, at the meeting most of the people was in favor of taking the railroad from one end of the city to the other and making the surrounding property industrial or commercial. Councilman Hubbard stated based on that information he felt like the future Masterplan was going to reserve all properties along the :railroad for industrial and commercial purposes. Mayor Pro Tern Freeman asked Mr. Perkins if he had a problem with the motion. Mr. Perkins replied no. Motion to approve carried 3-1; Councilmen Wood, Hubbard and Thomas voting for; Councilwoman Groves voting against. 6. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas, to approve PS 81-30. Motion carried 4-0. July 13, 1981 Page 8 CONSIDERATION 01 ORDINANCE FOR PZ 81-15 APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 9C PLANNING & ZONING- PS 81-30, REQUEST OF SHOWBIZ PIZZA FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 3_ BLOCK 25, CLEARVIEW ADDITIO~ APPROVED , r. - Ie 7. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve PS 81-34. Motion carried 4-0. Mayor Pro Tem Freeman called a fifteen minute recess. Mayor Pro Tem Freeman called the meeting back to order. The same Staff and Council Members were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. 10. Councilman ~od moved. seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to grant R. S. Brooks and appeal hearing to be held July 27, 1981. Motion carried 4-0. 11. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to grant an appeal hearing to Gene Stone to be held August 10, 1981. Motion carried 4-0. 12. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No. 908, amending Ordinance No. 179, Zoning Ordinance. Motion carried 4-0. 13. Mayor Pro Tern Freeman asked Councilman Hubbard to verify the ballot packets. Councilman Hubbard stated the packets were in order~ Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve Resolution No. 81-11. Motion carried 4-0. July 13, 1981 Page 9 PLANNING & ZONI PS 81-34, REQUE OF TENNECO FOR FINAL PLAT OF BLOCK 5, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTHAJ APPROVED RECESS BACK TO ORDER CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING AND APPEAL HEARING 0 PS 81-33, REQUES OF R. S. BROOKS FOR FINAL PLAT 0: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BROOKS ADDITION GRANTED CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING AN APPEP HEARING ON PZ 81-25, REQUES1 OF GENE STONE FOR REZONING OAK LEAF PARK, 2ND FILING GRANTED CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDIN( ORDINANCE 11179, ZONING ORDINANCE, REGARDING DUAL OWNERSHIP OF DUPLEXES APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 908 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION CERTIFYING BALLOTS FOR ABSENTEE VOTING FOR PROPOSE CHARTER AMENDMENT ELECTION APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 81-11 [e f "e l July 13,\1.981 Page 10 14. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve payment to Leonard Hazel, Inc., in the amount cf $89,187.83. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT TO LEONARD HAZEL, INC., IN THE AMOUN OF $89,187.83 - PRECINCT LINE RD. APPROVED Motion carried 4-0. 15. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to approve payment to J. L. Bertram Construction Company in the amount of $14,051.70. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT TO J.L. BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN ,THE AMOUNT OF $14,051.70 - NORTH HILLS SEWER LINE APPROVED Motion carried 4-0. 16. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to approve payment to Alan Hamm for right-of-way on Rufe Snow Drive in the amount of $41,819.82. CONSIDERATION'OF PAYMENT TO ALAN HAMM IN THE AMOUNT OF $41, 8l9~ 82 ' FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR RUFE SNOW DR. APPROVED Motion carried 4-0. 17. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to set a public hearing on Rufe Snow ITtive Assessment Roll for August 10, 1981. CONSIDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AUGUST 10, 1981 ,. ON RUFE SNOW ASSESSMENT ROLL APPROVED Motion carried 4-0. 18. None. CITIZEN PRESENTATION . 19. Councilman Woods moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to adjourn the meeting of July 13, 1981. ADJOURNMENT Motion carried 4-0. Dave Freeman, Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: e Jeanette Moore, City Secretary t ... t'age ö P & Z Minutes -June 25, 1981 ( (" ( e Mr. Hannon asked if it purpose to modify this two lots. wanted to keep Mr. Stembridge it simple. PS 81-32 APPROVED Mr. Bow moved to approve PS 81-32 subject to e engineer's comments. Mrs. Nash econded the motion. Mr. Hannon asked if the motion should not include upon approval of engineer's plans by the engineer.; MI. Bowen said that was covered in the' engineer's comments. The motion carried 4-0~ PS 81-33 Request of R. S. Brooks for final plat of Lot 1, Block l~ Brooks Addition. e Mr. Delbert Stembridge came forward. He requested that the Commission approve this final plat with the same stipulations that were used for the preliminary plat. He said he wanted a further chance to plead his case to the Cit,y Staff and the City Council. ( \, Mr. Tucker asked if he would prefer that the Commission postpone this case until he talks to the City Staff. Mr. Stembridge said he was not sure if no action was better than denying it because it can be appealed to the City Council. Mr. Hannon asked if Mr. Stembridge was telling the Commission that the owner is not willing to extend this water line~ Mr. Stembridge said he was implying that. Mr. Forester said that if the Commission does decide to approve this plat, he would like an additional. 10 ft. Right-of-Way for the future widening of the street. Mr. Stembridge said they have no objections to that. e Page 9 p & Z Minutes June 25, 1981 ( \ \, , (" Mrt Bowen said Mr~ Stembr~dge was asking that the Commission act upon this request with the stipulations still included. He said if the Commission were to approve this request with thestipulations~ until Stembridge agrees to those stipulations this case will not go before the City Council.' e Mr. Stembridge said in that case it would be best to deny it. Mr. Bowen said i~ Mr~ Stembridge is not going to agree to put in the water line then it will never go before City Council~ PS 81-33 DENIED Mr. Bowen moved to deny PS 81-33. The motion was seconded by Mr, Hannon. The motion to deny carried 4~O~ Delbert Stembridge came forward. said in regards to Richard Albin~ letter, they have no objectio to meeting his comments. He said· in gards to extending the sewer lin , it will cross ~ Rufe Snow. · PS 81-34 Request of Tenneco for final plat of Block 5~ Snow Heights North Addition~ Mr. Bowen aske 1:'. Stembridge if he "tJas ~greeing erything in Albints letter. was. PS 81-34 APPROVED s. Nash moved to .approve PS 81-34 subject to the engineer ~·s· comments.. Mr. Bowen seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0. Carl Greenfield resumed the Chair at 8;20 P-:.M.. Request of Baen-Bec~ Inc~ for dedication of Epoch Drive. Ernest Hedgcoth came forward. He said he was a consulting engineer represent~ng Baen-Bec on this dedication. He said in regards to the engineer's comments conc'erning a need for additional right-of-way, he has e e I , I e e \ \ ( ( Delbert R. Stembridge consulting engineer July 7, 1981 Honorable Mayor and.City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 ' North Richland Hills, Texas Re: Lot 1, Block 1, BROOKS ADD'N, Final Plat - Appeal. Gentlemen: The Final Plat for the above referenced tract was recently submitted for approval to. the. Planning and Zoning Commission and was denied due to lack of adequate fire coverage. The Owner desires only to build a metal storage shed on this lot. In order to provide the fire coverage requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Owner would be required to bear the expense of constructing 1,600 feet of 8" water line from an existing 16-inch line to his property. The cost of fulfilling this request would appear to be excessive in light of the fact that the Owner wants only to erect a metal storage shed on his tract. We would like to appeal to the City Council for approval of this Plat. Sincerely, DR.S / et 3729 Flory. North Richland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-1363 / \ ('" , e KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-[)allas June 15 1981 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-947t CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLSt BROOKS ADON., LOT It BK. It PS 81-33, FINAL PLAT ·e We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would refer you to our COInments by letter dated May 19, 1981, for the preliminary plans. 2. Although the portion of Cardinal Lane upon which this property fronts is not shown on the existing Thoroughfare Plan as a future arterial street, if you anticipate that future widening will exceed a 3D-foot residential street section them additional right-of-way will be required. We would refer this comment to your Planning Consultant, Wayne Snyder. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Allen Bronstadt Director of Development Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works e 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-621'· METR0/267-3367 e ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN,ACCQRDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS) SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179t ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HrLLS~ TEXAS, PASSED. APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION" AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13, 1967~ AS AMENDED JANUARY 27~ 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC H'EARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RIC~lAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: " \ RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 81-22 be rezoned from Local Retail Local Retail-Specific Use-Sign. the followtng describe.d property shall . . , . '. . ,. . ,. ...,' . . to BEING a portion of Lot 2-, Block A, Calloway Farm Addition, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded on Page 24 of Volume 388-121 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being more particularly described as follows: e B,EGINNING in the North line of Glenview Drive and being North 89 degrees 46 minutes East a distance of 8.0 feet from the Southwest corner of said Lot 2 and the intersection of the North line of said Glenview Drive with the East line of Cagle Drive; THENCE North 0 degrees 16 minutes West a distance of 8.0 feet; THENCE North 89 degrees 46 minutes East a distance of 5.0 feet; THENCE South 0 de~rees 16 minutes East a distance of 8.0 feet to the North line of said Glenview Drive; THENCE South 89 degrees 46 minutes West along the North line of said Glenview Drive a distance of 5.0 feet to the place of beginning. e -påge 2 \ . ,e This prOp-erty is located .on the northeast corner of Glenview Drive and Cagle Drive. . . . - . ,·AP.PROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 25th JUNE, 1981. ' DAY OF , '., "',~.@~~: ~ ~NING AND ZONING COMMISSIÒN . BE IT ORDAINED BY, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.PZ 81-22 IS HEREBY-REZONED THIS' '.. DAY ·OF e " .... MAYOR DICK FARAH ' CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND' 'HIL1-S' ArrEST: . ·CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE . , . CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY· ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS / .~ e .. - ~ -. .. ~... -... -' ... Page 16 P & Z Minutes June 25, 1981 ( (. . e Dr. Cobb asked if the sign ordi ce controls the height of the signs in a ordance with the height of the buildin e consideration and to try and locate sign so it would not interfere with widening plans. Mr. Forester know that answer. also controlled the said it did.· The Chairman asked if·anyonè else wished to speak for' or against this req~est. . There being no one, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 81-22 APPROVED Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PZ 81-22 subject to the metes and bounds of this sign being changed in accordance to meet the city code and meet the approval of the Director of Public Works/Utilities. ( \ The motion carried 5-0. PZ 81-23 Request of Northeast Construction Company to rezone Lots 14 thru 30, Block 20, Holiday W~st Addition, Section 3, from their present classification of IF-9 to 2F-9. This property is located on Sierra Drive~ approximately 1,018 feet east of Rufe Snow Dr. Alan Hamm, representing Northeast Construction Co., came forward. He said they were making this request to rezone from S~ngle Family to duplex a strip of lots bounded on the north by industrial property. He said when this property was rezoned several years ago from Industrial, it was the feeling that this property would not develop as such. He said that this is not the case today. He said they were asking for duplex zoning to buffer it against the neighboring property that is zoned industrial. e The Chairman said that if this request is granted some changes would need to be made in terms of water service. Mr. Hamm said they were aware of that. ,) ., , Page 17 p & Z Minutes June 25, 1981 ( I \, (. ( , The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak for this reque'st to please come forward. There being no one, the Chair called for those wishing to speak against this request,to please come forward_ There being no one, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. e Mr. Tucker said that since it backs up to industrial zoning, it makes more sense to make the transition into two-family instead of single family. PZ 81-23 APPROVED Mr. Hannon moved, seconded by Mr. Tucker, to approve PZ 81-23. The motion carried 5-0. PZ 81-24 Request of Cross Roads Dev. Co. to portion of Tract 2, Abstract 1606, w. w. Wallace Survey, from the present class· ication of Multi-Family to a proposed class· cation of Local Retail. This property is located north and approximately 500 feet st Drive. Drive Snow Delbert Stembridge c e forward. He said he was speaking i ehalf of Cross Roads 4IÞ Development. said they were requesting that this tr t be rezoned from Multi-Family tail. He said the current activi seemed to be toward office buildings and rip centers. He said Cross Roads was g ·ng to request that a strip of land on he north side of Lewis Drive be rezoned to Local Retail, but at his suggestion they' are requesting that the whole tract be rezoned Local Retail since Multi~Family can still be put in Local Retail zoning~ ( . Mr. Tucker asked if he was saying that the present zoning was not adequate to meet today's conditions or economy. Mr. Stembridge said yes. He said the inquires that the developer is receiving is for strip centers or office buildings. He said rather than just rezone a portion of the tract Local Retail~ they are requesting the whole tract be rezoned to Local Retail. e ¡' \ (' e KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas June 12, 1981 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hillst Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ'81-22t L.R. TO L.R. SU SIGN We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. .~ Ie RWA:mh cc·: Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Publi·c Works e 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METAO/267-3367 7624 Grapevine Highway North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 (817) 589-2236 I~ '. ~ , {. - '. . NORTH HILLS'~'" MALL -:- -" ~ " '.. ~ _ . ~ ø-' _'. ~ t "" '..~. " .... ... . , ", . ~ '. .f. \....... - , ~, ...... -./If"'..... '; :"",. (' , 'e. I . . .,."' '- ;-'-- ......'" ~ ~.~ .. fill. ,,' r -. The 'sign will be coristructed of ',either rœtal 'or lexaß' (unbreakable plaStic) with a stucco finish. . ~ , ' '-~."..~j~j.~,:r:~: '~',~: .. 4 . '", i :': ..~~:..~~: . :.. ,.~... )~ j;~ "'r~_J_· , , ~ _:"1.~ .'4~'~'::'~~.~' ..~: :..~" ,,~, ~ ¿{~.~~..' ~..~., ,:'~., . ......~ . ... ., ~." .,~ "., þ' '.~ .. ....'U. .".... . '-'.~" (e .. . ," ... . I"-"~ 4_ ::";,_. ~ ~...~:-... ,~J"... ~._ ...,.' . ":.-~ ~ ~,' .; ",,' ...~:.-:.-.;:~~~:~.;.:.:...--,;::?.., :.,' .-:.,,:.;j, ",",' ' 40 ... '.. :- {. .--. . " :'..::..#'......~. ,,"......':"..ç.... ..~~;.; . I Î'e e ".. . . .' , . " .; ; ; -~: .. ~ ¡. . ~ . . ~ ~ ) . : : < ~ ....' _ . : ; ~ - (~,..) I f _ '!. '~ 0 ... , .. t,' r s y. / , , !. r J, . ~~ '. ..' f) 0 'If ,~ . I.~ D. :. I.·..:· .. , y . ", . . . . ... ,Of '.. :.~ D. _'(_'.:-~ ~~ .'~' _..,~ _ i~ . ',' (), , _ il,'/'-' '" ~ r I . ". '), ~. ~ I). ". -:.~. , I . ,. .', . J, · " ') ~ . .,' . - . - ',.:: C N . ',' ~ " . .'.:". :. _ '" r ... . - '. ~ - - . . e. ¡~Cj-tTI-:(-:/'\ST :..~F..t)'C^L CLl:~iC .":.,:j~::()CL\·rIG:~ , ' Î é () 1 G LE~'IÌ\.'H::\V 0 ~ IVE 8172S4.9251 f"'O~T \\:C~TH. TEXAS 7õ118 ~ : ~ C '\' ~ :- ,,::..~ r 2 5, 1 9 E 0 Troy Fullër 1st ::~lj()nal ?~r~ 3üilGing P.O. 30x 186 Eu1ess, Tex2s ï6039 Dear Troy: Our board ~et yesterday to discuss the possibility of ::orthhills ~~all énd ~':orthr:2st Clinic sh2ring. a sign to 'be c C :"1 S t rue t e d on ~ ~ (", r t 'h e .:: s tel i n i cpr c p 2 r t)., · ..\ft~r ~~.~ch J~ SC~s~-tL'n, i t ...'.~s (}e~ ièt.~d ;:'!ot to cú~::'lne' the t ',.:0 n .-::";(: 5 on c :~~ S 1 g!1 . H C'~.·:C \" 2 r , the, J ,~(~ t ",' r s '.,"'i 11 give p2 r- ,,~~~ion to ~\Ùl-t:1!1i 1 J s ~~311 i.~ c:r'~ct their ~ign en t112 ".:¡~st (: l ì d 0 f t 112 pro ~ (:.. r t y ~ ~ -. r (' \" i \ ~ i ~1 g ~ ~ 0 1~ t ~ ; ê ;! 5 tel j ~1 i. c \,- Lì U 1 d '0 è ? e r- ::: i t t e d a \: u r b c ,,J ton toe 2 g 1 e f r ,) ill (' 1..1 r '2 ¡:. :: ~~ p ~: r k 1. ;1 g lot 2 ~ 1 d the plot 0 f g r 0 ~ ~~ d d i l' 2 c: t 1 y b l:: h j 11 d t 1) 2 ;: ~~ r k 1 n g lot. "~e si~cE:re ly 11o;;e this c<;n b2 ..~ î ré11g~d . PI 23 se 1 et ...~e know if you have ~ny G~estiû~s. ÜSi'l1'C2Cel,Y~ _ . ) .J ß .. , ,-,'l I "..L ~:"".L-'- I~ /1 Jan Reid ° & Clinic ~an2ger JR/cd ( . e (e "e '," ';' /' - - ."~:; ":,~ ~ i " ! ,~ ' , , ~ i . ~~~";:,. j ';' - rr ,.; T: t1 J! r1- r- rr r~ (~:- . ~ ~ ' ::. I "'. ~ I: ~ ¡ l f "'." . . '. ', ,~~ J ~ ~ !-.. ~ . " , . -: ,,- '.: \.~) r , - ,.. ~ "-r \ . ~ . , . t' . ~. '. :~ ~..! .' .~ ~... '.., \. ~ -<II .. ,I ~:l". Tl~C)~- j--1.111 e r 1: tl 1 : (~r f..: Co. ;~ ~;- ? 1 t (.. 1. ~ s 1 s -c =..~ a L i ()~: 2. 1 ;" 2. :. k I3 'J i 1 rì i n ~ P.O. 20x 186 Euless, Texas 76039 Dear Tl"OY: " (. ~ .' r:.'. ~" . ' y ¡, : c ,': ;-, ~ '. ¡' " . r .,..:. ~ : q ~ i:" ! i j ~,~~.. - 2 ì ~ 6 No\',Ye~11)er 28 1980 It \~;as nice to meet :you 11;ednesda~"r and \,;e al)preciate your Coo})(:ration v;i tJl our request to constl'uct a fnall sign on the Clini.cs' l)l'Ctpel·t:r adjacent to GleI1\"ie~.~ Dri\-e. r n a c co r'd 2,11 ce \\" i t h ~TOU1" l'eC} u C? s t, .'.:. e a r'e al)p 1'0\- i!1 g th e C,li l'b cut c,n r~1;~le Stl'cet to l)l'O\~i.(ie ac.:CLJSS LO 1)al'kin6 1.;t.:!~ind the c"l i ~1 i c. ~\f1..t u:rall~T tll is "\::ork \\"il1 '1je, Cé)!'::l)leted ~1.t t11e clinic's (; :\'1=' t =~ : 1 ;.:; e . TL.~:.~;ks agai11 for your assistance in this !:latter. PSN/lk cc : Ron "Teller Kindest r'egards, l\Ol'th' Hills }!all ~~ S . ~ l¿ò-^-- Peter S. Xichols General 1!an ager ^ Project of Federated Stores Realty. toe. FULLER & CO., REALTORS First National Park Building, P. O. Box 186, Euless, Texas 76039 (817) 267-3121 (. e January 20, 1981 Mr. Peter S. Nichols General Manager, North Hills Mall 7624 Grapevine Highway Fort Worth, Texas 76118 " -} -1 RE: Sign to be erected by Federated at the corner of Cagle and Glenview and curb cuts at Northeast Clinic. Dear Mr. Nichols: (e At the monthly meeting of the owners of the Northeast Clinic, I gave a progress report on the curb cuts to be installed along the east side of, Cagle Drive on property owned by Drs. Rush, Pillow, Bell and Jacobson et a1. The owners have contracted to have one ·cùrb cut installed immediately on their present parking lot. They have decided to wait on the curb cuts on the property to the north of the present parking lot until planning can be completed as to where the best place would be for these cuts. As soon as you have received your bids and renderings for your sign to be installed on their property, please 'giv~ me a call at (817) 267-3121 so that I can show them what the'height of the sign will be and where you wish to place the sign on their property. ·At our last meeting with the Doctors they were in unanimous agreement that the type of sign you have along your entrances on Highway 26 are very attractive and would like to see that same type of sign installed on their property. As soon as you have your plans complete, please let me know and I will arrange to have the rendering of the sign picked up by their Business Manager, Jan Reid, and perhaps we can meet on the site at that time so that everyone is in agreement as to the exact location of the sign. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you would drop me a letter as to when you think your installation might be completed, I will forward this information on to the Doctors so they can be brought up-to- date at their next monthly meeting. Yours very truly, e FULLER & CO. REALTORS . / / .::/ ~], ,~ ;: / _,~ :d! gd/Jy/ Troy M. Fuller, C.C.I.M. TMF/tkl Page 16 p & Z Minutes June 25, 1981 ( c ... .l. , consideration and to try and locate the sign so it would not interfere with future widening plans. Dr. Cobb asked if the sign ordinance controls the height of the signs in accordance with the height of the building. -- Mr. Forester said he did not know that answer.- Dr. Cobb asked if this also controlled the height of the sign. The Chairman said it did. The Chairman ~sked if anyone else wished to speak for or "against this request. There being no one, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 81-22 APPROVED Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PZ 81-22 subject to the metes and bounds of this sign being changed in aècordance to meet the city code and meet the approval of the Director of Public Works/Utilities. The motion carried 5-0. PZ 81-23 Request of Northeast Construction Company to rezone Lots 14 thru 30, Block 20, West Addition, Section 3, from thei classification of 1F-9 to 2F-9. This property is located S· rra Drive~ approximately 1,018 feet t of Rufe Snow Dr. e Alan Hamm, repr nting Northeast Construction Co., came fo ard. He said they were making t to rezone from S~ngle Family to duple strip of lots bounded on the north b ndustrial property. He said when this roperty was rezoned several years ago from Industrial, it was the feeling that this property would not develop as such.. He said that this is not the case today. He said they were asking for duplex zoning to buffer it against the neighboring property that is zoned industrial. The Chairman said that if this request is granted some changes would need to be made in terms of water service. . Mr. Hamm said they were aware of that. ,þ . ¡ -- ( -- ( . e III P & Z ?wI in utes June 25~ 1981 ( (. . to get the Clinic's approval for a new location since they had only approved the sign at this location. The Chairman asked if the Commission approved it subject to a change in the metes and bounds description meeting the approval of the·~irector of Public Works~ would it be suitable. Mr. Forester said it would be o.k. He said he had no objections to the sign. He said his concern was to keep the sign location from causing a traffic hazard. The Chairman ·.called for anyone wishing to speak for this request to please come forward. Dr. Jim Cobb came forward. He said he had an office at 7600 Glenview. He said he did not know if he was for or against this request. He said he had a few questions ~oncerning the sign ordinance of North Richland Hills. He said Glenview has been a political issue between Richland Hills and North RichlandHills to get the street open and not to offend anyone. He said that he was Mayor of Richland Hills at one time. Dr. Cobb asked Mr. Nichols if there was undue pressure. brought on by 7601 Glenview at the time this street was being built to get an entrance from the parking lot of 7601 onto Cagle Drive. The Chairman said he did not see what the question had to do with the zoning. Dr. Cobb said he was trying to clarify it for himself and withdrew the question~ Dr, Cobb said if the street is widened and is leased to Federated StQres~ it would be considerable expense to the City to buy the lease back. Mr. Forester said that there were plans to widen,~lenview in the future and the City is encouraging Mr. Nichols to take it into I' Page 14 p & Z Minutes June 25, 1981 ( c " ., '\ expansion of the roadway and reviewed the design of the sign. The Chairman' asked how many feet off of Glenview would the sign be after Glenview is widened. -. Mr. Nichols said he could not answer that question. Mr. Hannon said the sign looks too close to the right-of-way and it would pose a sight hazard at the intersection. Mr. Forester.said he was having difficulty in reading the plat as to the location of the sign in relation to the right-of- way. He said a 50 ft. clearance would need to be kept both directions from thei~ntersect~on. He said they would need to measure 50 ft. from either direction of the intersection~ draw a triangle, and the sign needs to remain out of that area. Mr. Hannon said it appeared to him that the sign was sitting right on the ~ight-of~way according to the small sketch. He said it appeared to him that the sign needs to set back 50 ft. from the future right-of- way. . Mr. Forester said if Mr. N~chols stakes off 50 ft. from the intersection and drew a traingle, he. needs to stay out of the triangle area unless the sign is" elevated. Mr. Nichols said they could elevate the sign. He said they were proposing to erect a sign similiar to the sign owned by Glenview Pharmacy' so it would not block the Pharmacy sign. Mr. Hannon said the Commissions~s concern was with the sign location. The Chairman said there needed to be a change in the metes and bounds description of the sign. He asked Mr. Nichols if he was agreeable to this. Mr. Nichols said he would accept the Conunission~s decision~ but he would have ", Page 13 ,. P & Z ~1inutes June 25, 1981 ( (. . Mr. Hannon said a possible alt ative would be to move the drive that still would not change his fee ngs as to whether the city would like t ave this street as a dedicated ri -of-way. fill' off of the property line. He said they were trying to comply with the engineer' comments to keep a smoother curve. ( ed Mr. Forester what the feelings were. said they would prefer to ave it as a private drive, but if there are no problems with the dedicati~n for the right-of-way and the street is built according to city specifications, he saw no reason ,for not accepting the street. He said tbe set back does not meet the code and a variance would be needed and it would need to be dedicated as a street. 1otrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Tucker, to deny PS 81-35~ The motion to deny carried 5-0. . PZ 81-22 Request of Federated Stores Realty to rezone a portion of Lot 2~ Block A, Calloway Farm Addition, from the present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail~ Specific Use~Sign. This property is located at the northeast corner of Glenview Drive and ~agle Drive~ Peter Nichols, General Manager of North Hills Mall came forward. He said they are proposing to seek permission to install a directional sign on property' at Cagle and Glenview that is owned by the" Northeast Clinic~ He showed a photo to the Commission that the sign would be similiar to~ Mr. Tucker asked if he had checked the design and location of the sign with the City ordinances. Mr. Nichols said he had. Allen Bronstad to take a look at the site. He said that he had also measured and allowed for the -- .' ";~ "}-. , , ~ '<~~ (. . . . " ~ ·e ',' -~ w ~¿' DeJbert R~ Stembridge '" ':', "',: Ço~s~l~ng e~gi~~r ,W ;'a,.." ~ ,::,.'May 26),'198~ .~ . . ~. .. ... .. I. ~t .., '~'."" :-. . " ....... ,..,..... It .~.. "" .,',~. ...:.. ' " ... .;;,. " , r..· : ~ '. ~'. .", .,~ s :~'~t~~:·,~,~, . -' - - . '. . . ' ". , . . ..~~~"'... ¡:.¡; ~:. .·f / ~i~'·- i ,.:;, ,..., ~;.. t ~ > ~..~'p '~7 ':'. ·.;~"t.:'·\ ¡:.... ,"r-;'':~~'';.~:~~~~: L \ '-, . :~ ·;:....:1 .." ,~:~. )-i" ..~ '~~,::. \ ·c'.:·...,~,(i} ~~'~~I <'.i.:;.1, ~. . .¡ t:..'. . ,-:;. t I _! .' "'1 1 ~~~: :.~.:~ ?i > it;~ .~, ·s·, '.-:;:. ..:;5~ :~~ ¡: ~I. ;:. . '.~.: ',. .~.- to""".: Planning and.Zoning.Commi$sion C1ty of North Richland Hills 7301 N~E.,Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas :" ;~." ~.~,~'. .~~, t ,4~ ~;. .::~ < '~~!" \:~ ¡ (~~~ ,.' ".\ '.. . i. ",: .>.\. ~ .,..,. "... . . . . " Re: Lot 1, Bloc~ 1, Brooks Addition Preliminary Platcand Plans ~ :~ i~ . ,:':t , . .f .~. .... ~ . lri"'re-sponséto:KnówltoIÌ~'Eng1ish-F1owers letter of Hay 19, 1981, we offer. the. fol,lowing comments:' . , .' -? }.. ... ;....: ~' - .~ : .... -.,,-... :,. t :'. ",'.,. -, ,,'" ~... . I' .' .:.. , ¡ ~ ...' \e 1. A written statement certifying to the accuracy of topo- 'graphic map has been ~dded to the drainage study map. ;¿ e. The Commission Endorsement block has been added to the plat. >3'. The location and width of proposed üti1ity easements has . been added to the plat~ ,~ .1 . ...... ~~ '.' ' 4';', The date of preparation of the preli~i~~ry plat has been " added. , ,. , ",.. '.:'. r' . " t '~. 1: ',: ,'. ,<.ì. -;'.'-" ''','' 5"~,:': The owner agrees· to sign a letter covenant agree'i.ng to participate in the cost of future paving and drainage improvem~nts on Cardinal Lane at suèh time as the street is built., ; . ¡ ,: 6. The owner also agrees to pay his pro rata share of the cost for the future 12 inch water line in Cardinal Lane. 7. The owner has operated his business at this location for several years with the conditions as they exist. He plans to erect a metal type building in the rear of his existing, building. The building will be for storage and a shop area. No additional plumbing will be required, nor is any more e 3729 Flory - North Richland Hills - 76118 -(817) 284-1363 ~ .' ._ .._ ... _ _ _.. a __ .. _ .. _ ~...~ -' j,."" : ,,' , .., (( ((0· ¡:>age 2 Lot 1* Block 1 Brooks Addition fire coverage desired, other than that presently existing. The Owner believes that extending a ó-inch water line 1600 feet to serve a storage building creates an undue financial burden and hereby requests that this burden be delayed until such time as the future l2-inch line is constructed. At that time, the Owner will pay his pro rata share..' 8. The present septic system serves only restroom facilities and appears to be functioning satisfactorily. Unfèss there is some reason to believe that the septic tank is not functioning satisfactorily, the Owner believes that a·· percolation test at this time is not necessary. If there are any questions regarding these comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, cc:. Mr. cecil Forrester, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of special Projects " . , .,. t~ ~. .. . ... " '.~ :-: " £; .;", ~~' .:~.~~. J - "..... . ..' of ~. 4t' .,' . ." .. '"' ' '. ..,. :...,... ,,-'.0( -::: ;" :-'; " .. ;: ~ ... " .:. ~:~, :~ ~";;' ~:: . ':~ :ii'.: -:;~~;.~~~ " .. ~ 1..r :: ,';' ';~.~:; ',.:;-!'.~ ~,~ '~." ~. :. ..' ," ~,.#. ",::, 0": -~,4 ~~~¡~.~'~~,'.~. ~.~ ~ ,.... .;¡.. ".' -........ . ..; ~'::, t :... ..~ -~'" .. /, '"' ... fJ',,; ) e e ~t e ~~ ~, f- r \,: KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallë1s May 19~ 1981 . , Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hill s, Texas 76118 ..' ...... .. ·~E_4~(. .. . . Re: 3-947~ CITY O~ NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, BROOKS ADON.t" lOT,!, BK. 1~ PS 81-24, PRELIMINARY PLANS, (GRID 89) We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following c~ment~: 1. As required in Section 1-03. 0.10. of the Subdivision Ordinance. the Developer's Engineer who perfonns the drainage study must affix a written statement to the drainage plans certifying the accuracy of the topographic map and drainage areas upon which the drainage study is based. -2. Commission Endorsement block should be added to the plat. 3. The location and widths of proposed utility easements should be shown on the plat. 4. The date of preparation shoul d be adde.~ to the prel iminary plat. 5. The Owner should be required to sign a letter covenant agreement to participate in the cost of future paving and drainage i~provements on Cardinal Lane. in accordance with the provisions of the City's Assessment policies, at such time that the street is rebuilt. 6. The water system master plan calls for a future 12-inch line in Cardinal Lane. The Owner should agree~to participate in the costs of thi"s future line at such time that the water main is ·constructed. - " 7. The proposed area to be platted does not have fire hydrant coverage. We do not recommend installation of a fire hydrant on the existing 2-inch water line in Cardinal Lane. To provide the proper coverage a 1 ine of at 1 east 6-inches woul d have to be extended to se'rve thi s tract from Pearl Street or Simmons Drive. both locations being greater than 1600 feet from the Tract. However) as indicated in item 7 above the future line in Cardinal Lane should be 12-inches' in diameter. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · SE;DFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367 : ~. ../ ( ( ,t'¡ 't, ~/ /' ';/. ( . ". . \ .. ' ,.., Page 2. Planning &. Zoning Commission. r·\ay 19. 1981 8. Percolation tests should be performed and results furnished to the Health Department to determine if the existing septic system is adequate. Reports of such tests should also be furnished to the city · Should you have any questions concerning the review of this šubdivision. please do not hesitate to call. (' RWA/l jc cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad. Director of Development Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works t> . ' ... - ~ 11 e e e ( \. ( . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas June 12t 1981 . Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North RichlandHillst Texas 76118 Re: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEWt PZ 81-23, IF-9 TO 2F-9 DUPLEXES We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~~w. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN', P. E. RWA:mh cc: Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/287-3367 s .. ♦♦- ,s,_:: ♦• ♦� ♦♦♦♦ m c''''. r1.-, '..-, 46 ,, n ' ♦ ,N N i.....:... a' V O ♦♦ O _Y ILL. °' b' U Z •6Y ♦♦♦ m b ,� b O n J • .� �I� W P� W \--... 4 a 'l c Y e IF 77II 't • ti. O• - o I LL o I�'l'�Q `� Iv Ey •^ (•.1>°r _3 I Ijl-:, i ��BOO 3 .. p 1D W IL tr. — a 'y l f WNW �A W C Y W. W - 64n j,i N 0 U. K r Q Z , W • • _ � : •J'; • LLr N I. O I.. X I = n ti ` O • LL'O m JW WHm 1Y M � I 22 b © i o of amm o •Q. S Y '� I e"5 ♦ wW N O Z j. I I r9- 0 W-O t' .� am•: • m m k i_ 0 0 $1* 'G a.v ° - a O b F J i y- - ~ - tt ° `t'> �iC q c m m Z Q `c - r. =..i & ;bt .y-e, '�i a,eba•• Jo r c.o . om \ O Q 3 \ T o OS - _ 4y• g• F R 6.9. m -• W Q 3 'r. �� •Q •,O ql O- e^ +,m t '� 3 • LL: . • aA o :�_f 4 d•cn �' ..e�• N ' . a• N . § - 2 , '� P a.9:, . P 8 z e , • ENO - b • lb" 990 i Q, I ° x,-6` - i O [ '" P iFt O NO . 0.�• x .C��. c 9c. a• o �{ 10 'j osti - a Q 6)° Y s ♦ i a $m ,�0 Q� 2 N`R Y y - 6Ley 1 a O ,. O ie ' 7. Y s >c ;Y E e..° P ;_tm 4 ;, 3'sc)cc w . m \ • . O 6„,6'OV ,.-• t p b' _ o T 'o a • m` o 1 ` ' - •l.. • m',F © 1 Y _esz: - --'o_oc'- - - -0.t V°_ I -COI S.e. c s P_^os'-- a ' IG -- I ° 3” z` °"-A so < •?•s 6 $ .. 8 ..KO St , ctza aeT a400 3 ,_ ao\o t• '• 8 s.69 • rrI °� :;:' . tj _.f R • S.i • & R ?' . 8 )_ . .1 o r. . rn'o. a2 _ am _ .—o_ _•w' i0?' x i 04^ �;> b 3 Aare 2. Y t 3 ♦ I 6 « wr•e sz c` ° �f `�O ` m •bp° F t s Es 1, ".. I R • c9 m' • I .. _R t< o _ £ ,°'$1.; •,, 4; 4G ' i13NyP 30 OW ' s 3AI .. l V1090B (N)4i: t• .,uaM^�` .d .0 - Ica'_ q).I —3:9C.i2;0Y w ?F o 4--- ---- Isis's -'-- I --------i.:. '. --- -R--- ,� o,., 1 _ o m '�? � ° '� 'ez ,, � I 'P ti '4 II �.aa ;:,..-1: :::31-_ 1. IC O 3 4 � s"NO a 9c9.° OGC M`•` r6C, .0'Ct° C7.Y1 ,;i 0� lig• M ' _ -_- pOF m a /� QS 006 95! 9'G NI t•4'Y it i[ O LZto AYSy• ^. 4�.,'m • __--O- • b ISOM Q I_:, - N • - �'f0 4. g a a • u.-„006 9Ct • 'C CL4 • 'LL 3Ala V1a11VA Ol3nd ?3 cc esa/—_ - l— - ----Z96cT'- lTL-J•'v —�`� .WC aEr-,t a op ._ • 006 94 •• 9St ,Z S6 !Zit C.Z. - I f:2_ 8Z 9t O pr-- - a. w, C.c..q7 pp :z .”- -- Q aA$ �__. 4i N • M I e '� 4•_ • '!, - O ' �• N • • IiryO• an�' �.J N a 10 a O TT • 7 .. o 6. p 1 /- i3 __ ___._ .. _. ,uau. _ C = • e I.•.•.o_ • 0. W 0 a b O m aFl+ _ • ^ L -iy •06 ,..ct - .. _- S. rS6 ,V • 'Z'W f.:: : 1 :. • .A ' I °i , •a , m , m .©A b • ■ m . N - 80 °.a = O 6' O a- • b : r ♦ I.,6I LL-•p S I6O • m Cs _ W ,0'06 IV .. .. .,St ,z 66 zit ..0 _ :,a. y- a 'ao a o N I 3A180 VN VA VH .r O.R ,.2^ �•♦+a= m ^ ^11. , ' .. t 006- z el- R .. _.Zin, • ..O • tn. b O • P ,• i ,„32 W i R N N O• �ry0<p W p a 0m$ LL m / • 9 'I r.•36s0': S)t'OZ 9'i/ A _� .9 Ct 2% • n Z :Lit iZ Yt - it:: �0r+0 .B i'c s m b N °o ._ N O e, m b Yf ♦ 4",zu .. * C g a N S - !.c 9 SZ a m 11 11 • „0'06 9Y( 1 act ► LY6 ^'L St ft it - - ct)t 09fl� 3A18a VavnrivaVn9 - - - - • ,� ., I --... 0-9.9 l` �' ---- Cc 6SE F SS ccn: Y ,Z �' 9'Ct `y S6 `a m• _� /1 a.- Our•r C.:'E ,Si • O • O ° I [. Q . 1� ,7/� • •n O_ n •o - • 'e m ti - °-' R N H E.AN_, t.47 anN = Roo ae m m a' A (R 006 ,c, 256 ZA •-.` .. .•St Pt _ ee°Y:♦„x •• o O t a A • 9' ,,, N - ?,e N m b h ♦ of • I.N♦. ~•° • 002'/0. • ,.: ^ a.- E-.D ,Ct • a m 1.-t0„O „pa. I r i' ro'V [12l .t06e I • , • et S6 ,, P.E. I R _-R •F a as Nn3NV� - - '- _ ° ti • o^°. 1 n n , Mf , n ! ti A N - .l n • . ♦ a •l•°. i M O ^ 0 Et 63 ,- n, . I r r 00 n 29: �:z. st 2t Si t!' .. ...040 3=Ng / ' tip 1 '0011 W W Q O; y :-.1 66'656 3„55,5Z.0N Z. LR I 3i99,5Z.0Noffmr$ 2 C Y • e ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ,ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS) SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE , OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS) TEXAS, PASSED. APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION" AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS~ NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27~ 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RIC~LAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: l\ XI . J/ RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 81-23 be rezoned from IF-9 Zt--9 the fol1owfng descri'bed property shall '_ . , , "'.' , . ,. ".""'." " to . . . . ~ .. . BEING Lots 14 thru 30, Block 20~ Holiday West Additi'on, Section 3, an addition to the City of"North Rich1and Hills, Tarrant'County, Texas, as ,recorded in Volume 388-133, Page 41, Deed Records, Tarrant County) Texas. This property is located on Sierra Drive, approximately 1,018 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive. ' Ie APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COr1MISSION ïnHIS 25th DAY OF JUNE . ,1981. BE IT. ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ,\CTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 81-23 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS· pAY OF ,1981. MAYOR DICK FARAM CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: -- CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS e .e e SUBJECT: :¡J; J D Appointment to Cable TV Advisory Committee DEPARTr1ENT: BACKGROUND: Marvin Reed resigned from the Committe and Mrs. Nancy Gumm has agreed 'to serve. It is the recommendation of the CabJe Committee that Mrs. ~umm be a'ppointed. This is a Counci:l appointment. CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve Appointment BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO ACCOUNT NUMBER: -- - ----- ---... ~ - -~ ------ ----- -------.... -.. -.. ~._- --- - -- _ _....... _ _.~_.. A.e_~",,,,__,...-,__.-._.-. ~ __~__~.. __........................____.- .. .. . -- -... . ...._-.... _. . .-.. . _. - --- - -------------- ----.- ---..------.......... ....- - . - .. -....- - .. e r' e þ' e Uf\It:.: uUIY Z~, l~ö~ SUBJECT: Resolution on Designat~ng Official Ne~spaper DEPARTMENT: City Manager/City Secretary. BACKGROUND: The Ci~ty's official newspaper at the present time is the _Fort Worth Star Telegram. .Due to the cost of legal advertising, we Wotlld like. to change to Mid Cities. We have made a comparison of the cost difference ~n the .two papers. Mid Cities charges $2.00 pèr column (approx1mately.7 lines) Fort Worth Star Telegram chårges $1.26 per line. We recently had to advertise the C~arter Amendments in the Star Telegram and-the cost ~as $2,100.00. ' If we' . . had used Mid Cities, the cost w~uld have been ~120.00. We have checked with the City Attorney and the Mid Cities and. they meet the. qualifications required. Mid Cities covers Hurst; Bedford, Euless, Richland Hills, and North Richland ·Hills. Their circulation in North Richland Hills 'is . . 2,800 on Wednesday and 877 daily subs~ribers; a total of 8,000 subscribers in the su~rounding cities. Richland Hills, Hurst, Bedford, and Euless use the Mid Cities' for their'legal ·advertising~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approv~ Resolution . ,tl BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO 'A . A~COUNT NU~t8ER: - - - .. --.- ... - ... - -- ~ - .-, - ... ... - ............ .... ... ..;. - .... - .- ... -"- -- -- ... -- ~ - - - .... - - ~ ... - -- - --.... ~..... - .........- - - - -~~-~~~~~~~~~-~-~~ -H-/ ;2--; -t/ / : ~'dN~!;J~!~!Sº!~5~1~!!!!11 July 22, 1981 City of North Richland Hills Janette Moore City Se'cretary The Iv!id Cities Daily Ì\Tews is a, 6 day dRily pu"blished 'every day 'tiith the exception of Saturday. , G'ur C overaee area includes Hurst, Euless, Bedford, Richland and North Richland Hills. I · We have a 2nd. class mailin~ p~rmit approved, by the U. S. Postal service and process trxough the Hurst Post Office on Precinct Line Road in Hurst. Our legal rate is $2.00 per cólumn inch ·per insertion. Please send legals i~, if possible, two days prior' to þubli- cation and direct them to my desk. W'e are looking forward to serving your needs. ägardS J Carolyn Hawthorne Advertising and Business l"1anager CH :el cc: File , e e , I -d( RESOLUTION NO. 81- RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS~ DESIGNATING AN OFFICIAL CITY NEWSPAPER. WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Texas provides that a City shall designate a City newspaper each year~ and; WHEREAS, the City Council has not designated an official newspaper this year~ and; WHEREASt the City Council feels that the City needs an official newspaper. BE ,IT~ THEREFOREt RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: The Mid-Cities Daily News is hereby designated as the official City newspaper for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, being a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said newspaper to'be used for all official notices and publications of said City. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1981. Mayor Dick Faram ATTEST: Ci'ty Secretary Jeanette Moore APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Rex McEntire ~-;d'- 6~- 7-21~81 , DATE: e e SUBJECT: Partial Pay Estimate #2 - Booth Calloway Projp~t DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND: Public Works Contractor is asking for paymen~ #2 on wQrk pe~fo~ed S8 of 7-10-81. Almost all worked completed ;n~ol~T~~ ~o~structiQR of utilities or relocation of utilities. Total Contract $474,6QQ 11\ Labor & Material to Date 42,651..00 Less 10% retained 4,265..]0 Difference 38,385.90 Less Previous Payment 20_164.05 18_221.85 Due this Estimate ~ , CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: A~val ú[~estimate #2 in amount of 6,22~ BUDGETED I TEfv1: YES x NO ACCOUNT NU~1BER: Bonds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I · t e e , I "t KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas July 13. 1981 Honorable ~Jayor and City Council City of r'forth, Richland Hi11s 7301 N.E. loop 820 North Rfchland H111s~ Texas 76113 Ref 3-313~ CITY OF NORm RICHlAi10 HILLS! 800TH Ci\l.LOtiAY RDAD UfPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY E$TlMATE rm. 2 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Par-thl Pay Estimate No.2, dated \July 10, 19tn~ ;nade payable to Austin Road Co."J1þany in the .amount ðf $18,221.85, for materials fur,1hhed anE! wor~ performed on the referenced project as of July 1. 1981. The quantities and condition of tha project haVt! b~en varified on-site by your repr~sentat1Ye. Floyd HcCallum, as indicat~d by signature on the estimate, ~I'td we have checked the ita1J extensions and additions. We r~c~end that this payment fn amount of $18.221.85 be made to Austin Road Co. at P.O. Box 2235, ~rt Worth, Texas 76113. Along \'Ifth IÌ copy of this letter. the Contractor is. befng furnished a blank estimate form for preparing na:(f; month's estimate. ~w. RICHAno l/. ALBIN. P.E. Rt~A/l jc cc: Hr. !NfUht S."'t1 th, Austin ~oad . _ . ., "--2~ ¡:.o~ Mr. Cecil Forester, Oirector of PUblic Horks ~ 1 hl~ ~(,¡. . . .. Mr. A11~n Bronstad. Director of Develop~ent Mr. Floyd ~~Call~u. City rnspecto~ 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 CON T R ACT 0 R t S EST rv1ATE - - - - - - ------ EST~TE NO.- 2 JOB NO.- 3-318 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ()~:l\!'" f\!ORTH RIC~ILAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- TIM~CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 45 DAVS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD CO~PANV FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 7/ 1/81 WORK ORDER DATE- 5/18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DATE- r\~o. ITE¡'-1 DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS THIS UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ~~~-~~~-~-~~-----~~~----~--~~~~~---~~ -~~-~--- -----~-- 1. UNCL. STREET EXCAVATION C.Y. 0.00 0.00 2. SURGRADE PREP., NO ADMIX S.V. 0.00 0.00 3. SU8GRADE STAB. WITH LIME SLURRV (6" THICK) S.Y. 0.00 0.00 4. LI~"E FOR STABILIZED SU8GRADE TON 0.00 0.00 5. SAW CUTS FOR REMOVAL OF EXIST. CONC. AND ASPH. L.F. 0.00 0.0) 6. R E \1 0 vE E X 1ST. CUR B & GUT T E R L . F . 0 . 00 0 . 00 7. RE \~OVE EXIST. 5" THK CONCa DRIVE~/AYS S.F. 0.00 0.00 8. CONSTRUCT 6" CURB & 18" GUTTER, INCL. REINF. STL L.F. 0.00 0.00 9.6" THICK CONC. VALLEYS, INCL. REINF. STEEL S.F. 0.00 0.00 10.'-30 OR EA-HVf-1S PRIME COAT , \/~I I T H SAN D S . y . 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 11. (-2 OR EA-HVRS ASPH. TACK COAT S.V. 0.00 0.00 12. TY.A HMAC, 4ft THICK, COMP. IN 2 EQUAL COURSES S.V. 0.00 0.00 13~ TY.D HMAC, COMPACTED 2" THK S.V. 0.00 0.00 14. TY.D HMAC FO~ TRANS. & ~ISC. USES TON 0.00 0.00 15. ADJ. EXIST. SAN. SEWER M.H. TO FINISHED STREET GRADE EACH 0.00 0.00 16. ADJ. EXIST. S.S. CLEANOUTS & WATER VALVE BOXES EACH 0.00 0.00 17. 5" THICK CONCRETE DRWYS., INCL. REINF. STEEL S.F. 0.00 0.00 18.4" THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALKS INCL. REINF. STEEL S.F. 0.00 0.00 19. RE~OVE, SET BACK & RELOCATE EXISTING FENCING L.F. 1725.00 0.00 20. RF~OVE EXIST. CULVERT STRUC. AT CALLOWAV BR. & C. RD. L.S. 0.00 0.00 21. UNCL. CHAN~EL EXCAVATION C.V. 0.00 0.00 22. CL.A(3000 PSI) FORMED CONCa FOR CULV.&TRA~S. STRUC. C.V. 0.00 0.00 23. CL.R(2000 PSI) UNF. CONCa I FOR CH.LI~,,!ER &~ISC. LJSES C.V. 0.00 0.00 2 4 . t f I) I A. \.~ E E P H 0 L E S , I N C L . FILTER MEDIA EACH 0.00 0.00 25. TRIPLE PIPE RAILI~G FOR CULVERT RAILING L.F. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL UNIT PRICE --~-~-~- ~---~--- 0.00 2.12 0.00 1.75 0.00 1.23 0.00 75.00 0.00 1.03 0.00 2.05 0.00 1.08 0.00 4.91 0.00 3.21 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.11 0.00 5.70 0.00 2.93 0.00 30.00 0.00 120.00 ü.oo 120.00 0.00 3.40 0.00 3.40 1725.00 1.62 0.00 1050.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 247.00 0.00 20ù.üO 0.00 8.40 0.00 17.70 'p 1 OF 3 FILE F3318 7/10/81 2/21/82 AMOUNT -~...._.............._- 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o . /,0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2794.50 0.00 I 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 o.oc o.oc - - - - - - CON T RAe TOR t S - - - - - - - EST I !\1 ATE - - - EST~ATE NO.- 2 ~OB NO.- 3-31R P~oa:T DESCRIPTION- BOOTH CALLO~,¡AY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE !tv1PROVEMENTS OW~ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- TIME CHARGED THRU PE~IOD- 45 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED A~D LABOR PERFOR~ED IN PERIOD ENDING- 7/ 1/81 WORK ORDER DATE- 5/18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DATE- r! () . I T E ~~ DES C RIP T I 0 "J ----~~~~--~~~-~-~~-~-~-~~~~~~~~--~-~- ~~-~-~~- -~~---~~ -----~-~ ~~--~~-- --~~-~~~- AMOUNT 26. ANCHOR PLATES FOR CULVERT RAILING 27. POSTS FOR CULVERT RAILING 28. REINF. STEEL FOR CULVERT & T R ,,-\ N 5 I T I 0 ~I S T RUe T U RES 29. ROCK RIPRAP (12-INCH) 30. BEDDING MATERIAL (4-INCH) 31. lA' 'DrA. ((L.III )RCP I/\jCL. EXC.,E~B. & BACKFILL 32. 21' 'DIA. ((l. I I I )R(P If\1CL. EXC.tE~B. & BACKFILL 33. 30' 'DIA. ((L. I I I )RCP INCL. EXC.,E~B. & BACKFILL 34." 'DIA. (CL. I I I )RCP INCL. EXC.,EMB. & BACKFILL : 3 5 . .J 6 ' t r) I A. ("C L. I I I ) R C PIN C L . EX(.,EMB. & RACKFILL '.3 6 . 39 ' I f) I A. ( C L. I I I ) R C P I t\ C L . EXC.,EMB. & BACKFILL 37. 50' 'X31" FULLY LINED & COATED CGM PIPE ARCH 3ß. 5' CURB INLET 39. 10' CUR8 INLET 40. 15' CURB INLET 41. STOR~ DRAIN VAULT AT STA. r-,1 + 2 3 42. STOR~ DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 10+84 43. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 15+38 44. STOR~ DRAIN VAULT AT STA. 21+63 45. gt'DIA.(CL.50)DUCTILE IRON \ AI ATE R L I ~'.\ E 46. 6t'DIA.CCL.50)DUCTILE IRON \~JA TER LINE 4 7. Due T I LEI RON FIT T I [\! G S 48. 16' 'DrA. TAP. SADDLE & 8" I TAP PING V.l\L VE ~'!/ BOX 49. "XRt' TA.P. SLEEVE & 8" TAPPING VALVE W/BOX 50. 6"X6" TAp. SLEEVE & 6' t TAPPING VALVE W/ROX 51. 16' 'DtA. TAP. SA.DOLE & 6' t TAPPING VALVE W/BOX PREVIOUS THIS UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE EACH EACH LB. C.V. e.Y. L.F. L.F. l.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. EACH EACH EACH L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. L.F. L.F. LB. EACH EACH EA.CH EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 325.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.co 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 105.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 61.00 1425.00 0.00 3.00 O.OJ 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 236.00 1750.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 UNIT PRICE 26.50 164.00 0.30 53.00 19.00 21.00 23.10 35.00 40.00 47.00 55.00 63.00 1050.00 1320.00 2000.00 3150.00 2100.00 2100.00 1900.00 18.00 14.00 1.50 1600.00 1200.00 1050.00 1060.00 P 2 OF 3 FILE F3318 7/10/81 2/21/82 o.oc o.oc I o.oc G.oe a.os o.oc o.oe o.oc c.oc '" f'.'-" v.'-J\".; 5775.0C o .,. 0 C o.oc a.oc 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oc 0.00 2160.0C 3304.0C 2625.0C 3200.0C 3600.0(, 0.02 4240.0~ CON T RAe TOR ' 5 EST I f'I1 ATE - - - - - - - - - ----- FST1'ÞATE NO.- 2 JOB NO.- 3-318 p~~ T DE SCR I PT IO(\1- BOO TH CALLO'~~A Y ROAD 5 TR EE T AND DRA I NAG E I ~APROVErv1EN T S OW~ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICH~AND HILLS DATE- T I Îv1 E C H A R G EDT H R lJ PER 1 0 D - 4 5 DAY S CON T RAe TOR - AU S TIN R 0 A D co rv, PAN Y FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND lABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 7/ 1/81 WORK ORDER DATE- 5/18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DATE- Î\'O. I T E rvï DES C RIP T I 0 i\~ PREVIOUS THIS UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE TOTAL P 3 OF 3 FIL\E F3318 7/10/81 2/21/82 ---~~~~~~-~~~~~~~--~~~-----~-~~-~~--- --~---~- ~---~~-- -~---~-- -~~----- ~~----~~- A~10UN T 52. WATER SERVICE TRANSFER EACH 9.00 0.00 9.00 420.00 3780.0C 53. ';\} ATE R SERVICE LINE L.F. 285.00 0.00 285.00 6.50 1852.50 54. RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE !-IY DR ANT EACH 0.00 1.00 1.00 600.00 600.00 55. e ' t DIA. EX. STRE¡\JGTH v.c. SAN. S E ~-J E R LINE L.F. 100.00 320.00 420.00 16.00 6720.00 56. SA,N. SE\.\IER SERV. COI\}~ECT I O~I EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 57. 4-INCH SAN. S E ~,/ E R SERVe LINE L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 58. 2 It DIA.&3 t 'DIA. \^J ATE R LINE TRANSFER CONNECTIONS EACH 4.00 0.00 4.00 500.00 2000.00 FIELD VERIFICATION OF JOg CONDITIONS AND CONFIRMATION OF PAY QUANTITIES R Yt2ª_-J2t:.~Ei- '~eY1-------- (OW~ERtS PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE) ~ATE- .19 -~~-~~~-~~~~~---~-~~-~~ ~---~-~~~~-~~~~~-~-~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~--~~--~--~~---------~~~-~-~~-~-~-~~~~-~~-~~-~-- APPROVED- ,NO~LTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERSt INC. C0¡z;:¿NS I JING ENGINEERS RY- . · aJ-. W. . ~ h - ---------------~---- DATE- ' 7 / /~ .19 JYJ ____________________--_ __L_ TOTAL ............. LESS 10 PERCENT RETAINED . . . . DIFFERENCE. . . . . . . . · . · PLUS 75 PERCENT MATLS ON HAND. . TOTAL ............. LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS . . . . . DIFFERENCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE. . NOTE-PAY LAST AMOUNT SHOWN 42651.00 4265.1C 38385.90 O.OC 38385.9C 20164.05 18221.85 TOTAL EARNINGS (INCL. RETAIN.)-$ 42651.00 TI~E CHARGED THRU THIS PERIOD- 45 DAYS TOTAL BID-$ 474699.15 PERCENT~ 8.98 TOTAL TIME- 280 DAYS PERCENT- 16.0ï I