HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1981-10-12 Agendas
I
'-
.
CITY OF NORTH RfCHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
f(J;~ the Meet; ng October 12" 1981
~ at 7:30 p.m.. in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER· - .' ITEM
PRE COUNCIL
6:45 P.M.
1. Personnel Ac't i on
COUNCIL
7:30 P.M.
to Order
Invocation
Approval of Minutes of the Emergency
Meeting September 22, 1981
5. 'Approval of Minutes of the Regular
'-.-'
Council· Meeting September 28, 1981
¡r'\
6
Consideration of Appointment to the
Parks and Recreation Commission
L/
7. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 81-49, Request
of A. T. Adcock for Final Plat of
Briarwood Estates Addition, 4th Filing
Consideration of Ordinance Amending
Zoning Ordinance - Parking Regulations
for Du lexes
Consideration of Ordinance Concerning
.Fees for Re lats in Sin le Famil
and Duplex Zoning ~istricts
ACTION TAKEN
(closed due to subject matter)
/1 ~
!/~{"'l/ . X:'/ ../
. Page 2
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
r:...;r the Meet;ng October .1~, 1981
, at 7:30 p.m.. in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
ITEM
Consideration of Ordinance Amending
Ordinance No. 381, :Rules, Regulations,
Policies and' Procedures for the City
of North Richland Hills Water and Sewer
S stern
,.ACTION TAKEN
,1" ,
tf / _4
\.,.,r .' ,
Consideration of Ordinance Amendin Lone
Star Gas Com an IS Franchi,se Ordinance
Ii
IU/f. ~-
~-
Consideration of Resolutio:~
Director to the T rrant Count:~---ráj~al
District
,\, ,;' . ,'), ./ / . .;' !
,:tCli /:4,' r
'-
/-'l, (
J
. ing
,~
..v'....
-:::. .I-~
18. Adjournment
\ ~
.
I
l 1.
3.
. 4.
l
.
t
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN
THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820
OCTOBER 12, 1981 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Faram called the meeting to order October 12, 1981,
at 7:30 p.m.
2. Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Wood
J.C. Hubbard
Wiley Thomas
Dave Freeman
Sharyl Groves
Mayor
Councilmen
Councilwoman
Staff:
Chuck Williams
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
Dennis Horvath
Richard Albin
City Manager
City Secretary
City Attorney
Assistant City Manager
City Engineer
Absent:
Jim Ramsey
Jim Kenna
Councilman
Councilman
The invocation was given by Councilman Thomas.
C¡ouncilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
t'o approve the minutes of the emergency meeting
September 22, 1981.
Motion carried 3-0; Councilmen Thomas and Wood abstaining
due to absence from the meeting.
5. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman
Groves to approve the minutes of the September 28, 1981
meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
6. Mayor Faram advised the Council this was a Mayor's
appointment and asked for a recommendation from the Council.
Councilman Freeman recommended the appointment of
Mr. Bill Burk to ,the Park and Recreation Commis-sion.
All Councilpersons voted for the appointment of Mr. Bill Burk.
7. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning
Commission had approved this request subject to the engineer's
comments. The owners would sign a covenant for pro rata for
future paving and drainage.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF THE EMERGENCY
MEETING SEPTEMBER 22,198
APPROVED
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 28, 1981
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
APPOINTMENT TO THE PARK
AND RECREATION COMMISSIO
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 81-40, REQUEST OF
A.T. ADOCK FOR FINAL
PLAT OF BlRARWOOD ESTAT
ADDITION, 4th FILING
APPROVED
October 12, 1981
Page 2
[
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas
to approve PS 8l~49, as recommended.
Motion carried 5-0.
8. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning
Commission had approved this ordinance.
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE AMENDING
ZONING ORDINANCE -
PARKING REGULATIONS
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 924
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve Ordinance No. 924.
City Attorney McEntire stated this ordinance would
require only two. parking spaces instead of four
for each unit in duplex zoning.
Motion carried 5-0.
9. Mayor Faram advised the Coun~il this ordinance was
proposed because of a change in law pertaining to
replatting.
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE CONCERNING
FEES FOR REPLATS IN
SINGLE FAMILY AND
DUPLEX ZONING DISTRICT
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 925
Mr. McEntire s.tated the new law was that everyone
within 500 feet of the proposed replat had to be
notified and it also had to be published in the
newspaper. Mr.. McEntire st'ated this would be
time consuming and expensive.
r
~
Councilman Freeman asked if this would apply to
quick plats.
Mr. McEntire stated yes.
Councilman Wood stated he could see no problem with the
Ordinance. The city was only trying to recover the cost.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman,
to approve Ordinance No. 925.
Motion carried 5-0.
10. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas,
to approve Ordinance No. 926.
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORD~NANCE NO. 381, RULE
REGULATIONS, POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES FOR THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS WATER AND SEWER
SYSTEM
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 926
Motion carried 5-0.
.
¡
t
"
,-
.
,)
11.
Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to approve Ordinance No. 927.
Motion carried 4-1; Councilmen Hubbard, Thomas, Freeman,
and Wood, voting for; Councilwoman Groves voting against.
12. Mayor ~aram stated it had been recommended that
the City cast their vote for Mr. Herb Leach.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to nominate Mr. Herb Leach and further, that the City
cast their vote for Mr. Leach.
Councilman Thomas asked if Mr. Leach was being voted
on at this time or was he being nominated.
Mayor Faram stated that according to the resolution
Mr. Leach had already been nominated~
Mr. McEntire stated it was his understanding that Mr. Leach
had already .been nominated.
Councilman Freeman stated the way he read the resolution
the City'was casting their vote.
After further discussion, Mr. McEntire stated the
Council should pass over this item until he could
check and see if Mr~ Leach had been nominated.
13. City Engineer Albin read the following statement:
"At the first public hearing, citizens of this community
were given an opportunity to help establish the needs
of this City and their neighborhoods. Questionnaires
were provided, and are still available for anyone wishing
to participate in establishing community needs and in helping
to develop programs using Community Development Block Grant
funds that Tarrant County will request from the Department
of Housing and Urban Development.
The purpose of this public hearing is to consider projects
which will satisfy those needs. There is only one area in
the City of North Richland Hills which in the past has met the
low to moderate income needs criteria established by HUD.
This area is bounded on the south by Rufe Snow Drive; and on
the west by Rogene Street.
This designated target area contains a relatively high
percentage of low to moderate income facilities (55%),
and is subject to extensive physical decay and deterioration.
Several problems have been identified in this area including the
drainage channel which passes through the area is grown up
with extensive vegetation due to its earthen condition. Also,
the channel is experiencing large amounts of erosion due to
upstream improvements. Some houses on the channel are subject
to flooding during heavy rains.
September 12, 1981
Page 3
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE AMENDING
LONE STAR GAS COMPANY'S
FRANCHISE ORDINANCE
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 927
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION APPOINTING
DIRECTOR TO THE TARRANT
COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRI(
PASSED OVER AT THIS TIM]
PUBLIC HEARING -
DISCUSSION OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT, PROJECTS
September 12', .1-981
Page 4
(
l
The City Staff, in the absence of citizen input, has proposed
a continuation of the 3-year Community Development Projects,
which began in 1978, to provide concrete channel liner improvements
to this channel known as Mackey Creek. Phase I of these channel
liner improvements included channel liner construction from
Onyx Drive South to Jerrell Str~et. Phase II included channel
access ramp and culvert construction at Jerrell Street, and
Phase I~I, which is presently being designed, includes channel
liner construction alQng Mackey Creek upstream from Jerrell Street.
We are recommending a continuation of the, first 3-year project
to complete the channel liner improvements further upstream to
the upper boundary of the target area near Glenview Drive.
The first increment of, this three year program would include
channel liner construction to Onyx Drive to Harmonson Road to
Glenview Drive. Approximately $90,000 has been budgeted for
each increment of construction."
At this time we are accepting any comments, questions or other
statements regarding this proposal.
Mayor Faram ~pened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak to please com,e forward.
There being ,no one wishing to speak" Mayor Faram closed the
public hearing.
[
Motion car~ied 5-0.
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION APPROVIl
& ENDORSING THREE
YEAR COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO. 81-19
14. Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to approve Resolution No. 81-19.
Councilwoman Groves stated that since there was
a deviation from the 10% retainage down to 5%, she
had a problem with this because if the city started
deviating for this policy there might bea problem
with others wanting to do this.
CONSIDERATION OF PARTtþ,,~
PAYMENT TO J.D. GRIFFIT~
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN
THE AMOUNT OF $27" 764.0:
RUFE SNOW WATER LINE
EXTENSIONS
APPROVED
15. Councilwoman Groves moved" seconded by Councilman
Freeman, to approve payment to J.D. Griffith
Construction Company.
Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman
Wood, to amend the motion to 10% retainage.
Councilman Wood asked the City Engineer what he
based his recommendation on.
Mr. Albin stated that first of all the city did have
a performance bond in the amount of 100% of the construction costs
to fall back on if for some reason the contractor did not
fulfill all of his obligations. In addition to the
performance bond there was a maintenance bond.
f
.
.
in the amount of 20% of the contract for a period o,f
two years which covered a lot of thi~gs that were
not covered under the performance bond, to give the
city assurance that, the project met the specifications.
Mr. Albin stated the project was substantially complete,
the line was complete and had been for sometime. The
only hold up at this time was some trench density testing
required. Mr. Albin stated the amount of retainage,
approximately $28,OOO.~0, was more than e~ough to cover
the cost of any additional testing and also require the
contractor to come back and do any recomþaction that was
necessary.
Councilman Wood asked if the City had accepted 'the project.
Mr. Albin replied no.
Councilman Wooq ~sked if the City did not accept a project,
normally what was done.
Mr. Albin stated there was a retainage that was withheld,
but the policy was changing from 10% to 5% because of the
new State law.
Councilman Wood asked who change the law.
Mr. Albin stated the State changed it, but there were some
contingencies qn it, for example, if the total project was
less than $400,000.00 then you could withhold retainage up
to 10% without having to pay interest on the retainage.
If the' contract exceeded $400,000.00, which in this case
did not, you would be required to pay the contractor
interest earned on the retainage withheld. If 5% retainage
was withheld no interest was required to be paid to the
contractor. Mr. ,Albin stated that because of this all of
the ~ontract documents were going to be'modified to 5%.
Councilman Wood asked Mr. Albin if he was making an agreement
to reduce the retainage from 10% to 5% even though the
State law did not forbid it.
Mr. Albin stated that was correct.
Councilman Wood asked what the City's contracts stated.
Mr. Albin stated the City contracts stated 10% retainage.
Councilman Wood asked if the city had ever given anyone
else this particular consideration.
Mr. Albin stated yes.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Albin if he was talking about the
bond holding up in the event that at one point and time
it was accepted and a street was to be built over the
trench and there were two different contractors, two
different bonding companies, who became responsible
if there were a failure.
September 12, 1981
Page 5
September 12, 1981
Page 6
(
1
(
Mr. Albin stated if there were a failure due to
trench settlement because the trench was not
compacted to specifications, then the bonding company
for that contractor would be responsible.
Councilman Freeman asked if the paving contractor went
ahead and performed work on top' of this particular
trench, as he understood it, the bonding company would
be responsible for the compaction of the trench.
But, not for the damages concurred to the paving
contractor. Councilma~ Fregman stated by damages he
meant material and time lost while the trench contractor
would be re-preforrning:his duties. Councilman Freeman
asked if the City, would pick up that particular cost.
City' Attorney McEntire stated that as ~e understood the
plan, there was no intention to let anyone go ahead
with any contract ov~r\,: this trench until it passed
the'compaction test, even if the contractor refused
to do it two or three months from now and the city had
to go in and do it with $12,000.00 of the contractor's
money. Mr. McEntire stated there was no intention to
allow the construction over the trench unless it did
pass the ~est.
Mr. Albin' stated that was correct.
¡ .
Mayor Faram stated that all he wanted to do was to
see that the City got performance on the contract
and if the 10% retainage encouraged better performance
and a street was going to be constructed, he would
like to see the city protected as much as possible.
Motion to approve the amended motion to retain 10%
retainage carried by a vote of 5-0.
Original motion with 10% retainage instead of
5% carried 5-0.
Motion carried 5-0.
CONSIDERATION OF FINAL
PAYMENT TO LEONARD HAZEI
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN
THE AMOUNT OF $29~602.85
PRECINCT LINE WATER
SYSTEM EXTENSION
APPROVED
16. Councilman Freeman'moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to approve final payment to Leonard Hazel Construction
Company in the amount of $29,602.85.
Councilman Freeman withdrew his motion. Councilman
Hubbard withdrew his second.
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION APPOINTING
DIRECTOR TO THE TARRANT
COUNTY APPRAISAL
DISTRICT
12. Mr. McEntire stated he had talked with Mr. Leach
and he had not yet beennominat~d. Therefore, the
Council needed to make the nomination.
.
~
~ .
-
.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
'to nominate Mr. Herb Leach to the Tarrant County Appraisál,'
District.
Motion carried 5-0.
17. None
18. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of October 12, 1981.
September 12, 1981
Page 7
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram - Mayor
ATTEST:,
Jeanette Moore - City Secrêtary
l.
¡
r.
~
Ie
MINUTES OF THE EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY
HALL, 7301 NORTHÉAST LOOP 820"
SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Faram called the emergency meeting to order
September 22, 1981, at 7:30 p.m.
2. Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Kenna
J. C. Hubbard
Jim Ramsey
Dave Freeman
Sharyl Groves
Staff:
Chuck Williams
Jeanette Moore
Rex McEntire
Dennis Horvath
Absent:
Jim Wood
Wi ley Thomas
Mayor
Councilmen
Councilwoman
City Manager
City Secretary
City ,Attorney
Assistant City Manager
Councilman
Councilman
3. Mayor Faram stated he had been out of the City the last
week and upon calling City Hall was advised of the events
that took place at Greenvalley on Sunday. Mayor Faram
stated that after discussion with the City Attorney, the
proposed ordinance was drawn up.
Mayor Faram expressed his appreciation to the North Richland
Hills' Police Department and neighboring Police Departments for
a job well done.
City Attorney McEntire read the following caption:
IIAn Ordinance regulating IIMass Gatherings" in the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas; defining terms; making it
unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to promote
or hold a "Mass Gathering" within the City without a permit
from the City Manager; providing for an application form;
providing for investigation of the application; providing
for an appeal of the City Manager's decision in issuing the
application; providing for a hearing on the appeal before
the City Council; providing for grounds for denial of the
permit; providing for a cash deposit; providing for a
penalty of a $200.00 fine for violation of the ordinance;
providing for civil enforcement and providing for a savings
clause and effective date. II
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF
PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE
NO. 922, REGULATING
MASS GATHERINGS
APPROVED
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve Ordinance No. 922.
Mati.on carried 5-0.
There were several residents of the City in attendance
at this meeting.
Mayor Faram expressed his appreciation to the citizens
for their attendance and in-put in the meeting.
Mayor Faramadjourned the meeting of September 22, 1981.
September 22, 1981
Page 2
'ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
_I
},
¡
I
.
e
MlNUT~S OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY
HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, .
SEPTEMBER 28, 1981 -7:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order September 28, 1981,
at 7:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
2. Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Kenna
Jim Wood
J. C. Hubbard
Jim Ramsey
Wiley Thomas
Dave Freeman
Sharyl Groves
Mayor
ROLL CALL
Councilmen
Councilwoman
Staff:
Chuck Williams
Jeanette Moore
Dennis Horvath
Rex McEntire
Richard Albin
City Manager
City Secretary
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
City Engineer
News Media
3. The invocation was given by Shane Hubbard, grandson of
Criuncilman J. C. Hubbard.
INVOCATION
Mayor Faram recognized students from Mrs. Marion Staples'
Government Class, Rich1and High School.
4. Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to approve the minutes of the Sept~ber 14, 1981, regular
meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF THE SEPTEMBER 14,
1981, REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING
APPROVED
Motion carried 5-0; Councilmen Kenna and Wood abstaining
due to absence from the meeting.
5. Mayor Faram presented Mr. Ron McKinney of the Administration
Department with a Five Year Service Award and pin for
five years of service with the City.
PRESENTATION OF FIVE
YEAR SERVICE AWARD
TO RON McKINNEY OF
THE ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT'
6. Mayor Faram appointed the following to the Civil Service
Commission:
CONSIDERATION OF
APPOINTMENT OF
CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Ed Szol, three year term beginning October 1, 1981;
Mr. David Casey and Mr. Bob Skelton, two year terms
beginning October 1, 1981; Mr. David Phelps, one year
term beginning October 1, 1981.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to confirm the Mayor's appointments.
September 28, 1981
Page 2
Motion carried 7-0.
Mayor Faram appointed Mr. Bob Roark to the Civil Service
Commission for a one year term beginning October 1, 1981.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to confirm the Mayor's appointment of Mr. Bob Roark.
Motion carried 7-0.
City Attorney McEntire stated the only change in
the ordinance was in Section 3. The ordinance
previously passed had the penalty as a Class "B"
misdemeanor and it should have been Class "c"
misdemeanor.
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE ON LEGAL
HOURS OF SALE OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
APPROVED
ORDINANCE,NO.923
7. Councilman Hubbard moved, ,seconded by Councilman Wood,
to approve Ordinance No. 923.
Mr. Jeffery Davis, Attorney for Steak and Ale and
Bennigans, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Davis stated he understood the reason for the
change in the ordinance, but would like for the
Council to consider changing the hour on Saturday
night back to 1:00 a.m. Mr. Davis stated there
had. b,een a problem in the past with the parking
at Bennigans. Mr. Davis stated there had been
a survey done on the parking and between the
hours 12:00 and 1:00 a.ID. there were no cars
parked, traffic was light. Mr. Davis stated
Bennigans was renting an additional parking lot
that was costing in excess of $20,000.00.
Mr. Davis stated Bennigans was a family type
restaurant and the sale of food was approximately
65%. Steak & Ale had abou~ 80% food sales.
Mr. Davis stated he hoped the Council would take'
into consideration of going back to 1:00 a.m.
Councilman Kenna asked what time Bennigans stopped
serving food.
Mr. Davis stated that at Bennigans they served until
they could no longer serve mixed drinks. Mr. Davis
stated he had the manager of Steak & Ale and Bennigans
with him.
Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Davis if when they quit selling,.
alcoholic beverages at 1:00 a.m. on Saturday night, did
they stop serving food.
.
.
e
Mr. Davis stated he would h'ave to let the manager answer
that.
Councilman Kenna stated it was primarily the Council's
concern that the sale of alcoholic beverages in the city
was commensurate with the sale of food and it had been
called to the city's attention that many of the restaurants
sto,pped serving food at midnight.
Mr. Davis stated their general position was that people may
want a drink with their meal and when the clock came down
they did not want to violate any City Ordinance" therefore,
the drinks have to be removed.
Counc.ilman Ramsey asked if the dollar amount printed in the
newspaper on 'Steak & Ale and Bennigans is what they would
lose by not being able to sell ~lcnho1ic beverages later
,was accurate.
Mr. Davis asked if the amount was in the $30,000 range.
Councilman Ramsey stated yes and that the hours referred to
were between the hours of 12:00 to 2:00 a.m.
Mr. Davis stated he would have to ask the managers for the
specific number.
Mr. Mike Connor, Manager, Steak & Ale, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Connor stated his main concern right now was mainly on
weekends. Steak & Ale closed the restaurant at midnight and
at 12:00 they were required to take all the drinks off the
table. Mr. Connor stated the restaurant did seat people
up until 10 minutes after the hour.
Mr. Connor stated there were several times that ~eople
came inat,l2:00and they were told no drinks could be
served. Mr. Connor stated people in the lounge were served
also, not the full range menu that was served in the
restaurant, but ,there was a menu specifically for the lounge.
Mr. Connor stated they would like to be able to stay open
until 1:00 a.m.
Councilman Ramsey asked Mr. Connor if he was familiar with
the figures printed in the newspaper.
Mr. Connor stated he was not familiar with the figures.
Mr. Connor stated he did not think the figures would
be quite that much for Steak & Ale.
September 28, 1981
Page 3
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Connor if he had some idea of
a pe~centage basis the people that had come in for a
drink late at night as opposed to those that ,came
in to eat and have a drink.
Mr. Connor stated that the number of people who came
in to drink late at night was the same amount that
came in to eat dinner also.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Connor if he was saying that 50%
were coming in to drink.
Mr. Connor stated yes, probably.
Mayor Faram,stated he had some problem with the percentage
because he did not know a bar business, per S~t.·, was being
run. Mayor Faram stated he thought the alcohol was an
accessory towards the food service and it was getting a
little beyond food service for that time of night.
Mayor Faram state4 the requirement was on a 60-40 basis and by
admission, approximately 50% were there to d'rink.
Mr. Tony Stinson, Manager, Bennigans, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Stinson stated that first of all, Bennigans did have
_ a safety problem, but they did a survey and invested in
a large amount of money for additional parking in hopes
to eliminate the problem. Mr. Stinson stated Bennigans
served food until they quit serving liquor. Mr. Stinson
stated the ratio on food was approximately 70%.
Mr. Stinson stated Bennigans was not in the bar business,
but in the restaurant business.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Stinson if he could answer
Councilman Ramsey's question on the figures printed
in the newspaper.
Mr. Stinson stated the figures printed ,were pretty close
to being correct.
Councilman, Wood asked Mr. Stinson if he was aware of any
problems af.ter 10: 00 or 11: 00 at night on the, parking lot
or departures of the guests.
Mr. Stinson stated they'made an attempt to go out, esp~cially
on Friday and Saturday nights, to make sure there were no
problems. Mr. Stinson stated 'he was not aware of any pro~Jems.
Motion to approve carried 7-0.
September 28, 1981
Page 4
t
,
I
.
September 28, 1981
Page 5
8. Mr. Williams stated' sèven Uniform Companies were
sent invitations to bid and only two responded.
Mr. Williams stated the Staff recommended the
bid of Ladd Uniform Company.
CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
UNIFORMS
APPROVED
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman
Groves, to approve the bid of Ladd Uniform Company
in the amount of $15,007.15.
Motion carried 7-0.
9. Mr. Williams stated bids were sent to eight establishments
and four responded. Mr. Williams stated the Staff
recommended'the bid of Comet Cleaners. Mr. Williams
stated this was a budgeted item.
CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
UNIFORM CLEANING
APPROVED
Councilman Kenna asked if the contract was an annual
contract.
Mr. Williams replied it was an annual contract.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to approve the bid of Comet Cleaners.
Motion carried 7-0.
10. Mr. Williams stated bids were opened on September ?2, 1981,
and fifteen bids were received. The low bid received
was $227,609.91 by the Stolaruk Corporation, a Michigan
based construction firm.
CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
ON DAVIS BLVD. WATER
SYSTEM EXTENSION
APPROVED
Mr. Williams stated if the bid was awarded to Sto1aruk
he recommended that the principal be required to clean
the right-of-way each month before payment was made to
the contractor and inspected by the City and the State.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilwoman Grov~s,
to accept the bid of Stolaruk Corporation, subject to
the City Manager's recommendation.
Councilman Wood asked if it spelled out in the contract
that the 10%. retainage would be held out of the payment
each man th. .
Mr. Albin stated yes. If a contract was greater than
$400,000.00 the retainage (10%) had to be deposited
in an interest bearing account and after ~omp1etion
of the project the retainage, along with any interest
incurred goes to the contractor. Mr. Albin stated
that.._ since the contract was less than $400,000.00 the
10% retainage could be withheld with our having to
pay interest to the contractor.
Councilman Wood asked· if the specifications required
cleaning of the right-of-way before payment was made
each month.
Mr. Albin stated no, only the final clean-up.
Motion to approve with the City Manager's recommendations
carried by' a vote of 7-0.
11. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, .
to approve payment in the amount of $68,641.56.
Motion ,carried 7-0.
12. City Manager'Wil1iams stated the Revenue Sharing
budget was proposed as follows:
Public Works Equipment
Computerization Hard/
Software, (all departments)
City Hall Telephone
System .
Radio System
$,62,000. 00
$84,000.00
$27,000.00
r .
Total
$39,000.00
$212,000.00
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called
for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward.
Mrs. Jo Ann Williams, 7900 Maplewood, appeared before
the Council.
Mrs. Williams asked if the City did not receive the money,
which project ",ou1d take precedent and where would the
funds come from.
Mr.. Williams stated the City had 'already received
documentation on the Revenue. Sharing funds.
There being no one ~lse wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the, public hearing.
13. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to accept the bid of IBM and approve the transfer of
$25,000.00 from the General Fund Surplus to Revenue
Sharing to be repaid January 1983.
Mr. Williams stated this cash register would be
for the convenience of the citizens. The cash
register would be located in the front of the City
Hall and all payments would be made there.
Motion carried 7-0.
September 28, ¡98l
Page 6
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT #4 -
BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
APPROVED
PUBLIC HEARING -
REVENUE SHARING
(SECOND HEARING)
CONSIDERATION OF BID
FOR CENTRAL CASH
REGISTER
APPROVED
,
.
t
.
September 28, 1981
Page 7
14. Mr. Albin stated the City was required to read a summary
statement which describes the goals and objectives of the
Community Development Block Grant Program and describe the
procedure for citizen participation in the public hearing.
PUBLIC HEARING -
DISCUSSION OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
FOR CITY DEVELOPMENT
NEEDS AND SETTING
SECOND PUBLIC HEARING
Mr. Albin read the following statement:
"The Housing and Community Development Grant Program ~f
Tarrant County is now in its seventh year. In 1981, which
begins the seventh program year, Tarrant County and the
Urban Consortium applied for and received $3,136,000 for
implementation of its Community Development Program.
Since 1975,- the Tarrant County Consortium has been allocated
a total of $~6,392,OOO for Community Develqpment projects;
and since lQ76, the Consortium has received a :total of
$4,399.452 for implementation of a Housing Assistance Program.
The total amount of federal grant money allocated to the
Tarrant Co~nty Housing and Community Development Block
Grant Program since 1975 is $20,791.452. For the eight
program year, beginning in 1982, Tarrant County Planning
Department expe~ts to receive about $3,136.00.
The primary purpose of the Community Development Program is
to upgrade low and moderate income neighborhoods. The following
categories, and the projects ,listed under each category, are
examples of activities which have been approved by the Department
of Housing and U~ban Development for federal funding:
1. Public Works Projects which include:
Water system construction and improvements;
Streets, curbs and gutter construction and
improvements;
~rainage improvements;
2. Public Facilities which include:
Senior Citizens' centers and Community Centers
construction and repair;
Sidewalk wheelchair ramps;
3. Recreation which includes:
Parks construction, development and improvements;
Recreation facilities construction;
September 28, 1981
Page 8
4. Public Services which inclúde:
Fire Hall construction and pumper truck purchase;
5. Housing which includes:
Housing rehabilitation; and
Housing rental assistance payments
Since July 1978, the City of North Richland Hills has received
approval for and implemented the following' projects:
1. July 1978, 4th year program: Big Fossil Trunk Sewer,
Phase II
2. July' 1979, 5th year program: Mackey Creek, Phase I
3. July 1980, 6th year program: Måckey Creek, Phase II
4. July 1981, 7th year progr'am: Mackey Creek, Phase III
The following activities are eligible to be included in our
City's projects:
1. . Acquire and dispose of real property.
2. Acquire, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitate, install
or improve public, commercial and industrial facilities.
3. Clear, ,demolish, remove or move building and s truc tures.
4. Provide public'se~vices.
5. Remove architectural barriers~
6. Rehabilitate private property and public residential
structures and modernize, public housing.,
'7. Enforce building and housing codes.
8. Historic preservation activities.
The following procedures, which Tarrant County Planning Department and
our City will follow in drawing up the Three-Year Plan and Community
Development Program for approval, include in chronological order:
1. Needs and priorities will be assessed through a survey conducted
be the Tarrant County· Planning Department and thrQugh public
hearings held by each participating city.
.
I
,
(
I
I
.
September 28, 1981
Page 9
2. Development of projects will be made by the city
staff with citizen input provided at public hearings,
held by participating cities.
3. Three-year plan projects will be ranked by the Housing
and Community Development Subcommittees.
4. Approval of the proposed projects will be voted o~ by the
Mayor's Council of Tarrant County following the advice,
comments and alternative proposals submitted by citizens
at public hearings.
5. The Work Program and application will be submitted to
Tarrant County Commissioners' Court for their consideration
and ~pproval, based on the advice, comments and alternative
proposals submitted by citizens at two public hearings held
in Commissioners' Court.
6. The application will be submitted to North Central Texas
Council of Governments for A-95 review and comment.
7. The application will be submitted to the area HUDoffice
for approval, revision or rejection.
Some important HUD requirements, as established under the Code of
Federal Regulations Section 570 are:
1. Comprehensive strategy for meeting identified housing
and community development needs.
2. The program must be planned and carried out so as to be
of principal benefit to low and moderate inCdme people.
3. A Citizen Participation Plan must be written and implemented.
4. A Community Develop~ent and Housing Plan must be submitted.
5. The application m~st be submitted to the ·areawide clearinghouse
for A-95 review and comment.
All citizens, groups and organizations of our City are welcome to
participate and be represented at both public hearings. The public
hearings are open for public advice, comments, complaints, questions
or presentation of alternative proposals. You can be of great
service to your City and neighborhood by participating in these
public hearings.
The purpose of this public.hea~ing is to establish the needs of
this City and your neighborhoods. If you wish to present your
view in writing, please fill out the questionnaire. At this time,
we are accepting all comments, questions, statements or complaints
regarding these needs."
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing
to speak to please come forward.
[
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed
the public hearing.
Councilman Wood ~oved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
set the second public hearing on Community Development Block
Grants for October 12, 1981.
Motion carried 7-0.
15. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna,
to approve Resolution No. 81-17.
Councilwoman Groves stated she felt that everyone
should know that the reason for changing newspapers
was because ,of the cost of the legal advertising~
Motion carried 7-0.
16. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman,
to cancel the December 26, 1981, Council meeting.
Motion carried 7-0.
17. None
Mayor Faram asked the Cit,y Attorney to give an up~ate
on the Green Valley situation.
Mr. McEntire stated that Mr. Bill Hielscher filed a
temporary restraining order against the City with
reference to Ordinance No. 922. Mr. McEntire stated
Mr. Hielscher filed the suit with respect to the
races coming' up this weekend.
Mayor Faram stated the Council, would have an 'executive
session w~th the City Atto~ney after the CouRcil,meeti~g
in regards to this suit.
Mr. Jimmy Kirk, citizen, wanted to tharik the Council for
the effort they had put forth on the problems at Green Valley.
18. Mayor Faram,adjourned .the meeting of September 28, 1981.
September 28,- 1981
Page 10
CONSIDERATION 'OF
RESOLUTION DESIGNATI}
CITY'S OFFICIAL NEWS·..
PAPER
APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO. 81-17
CONSIDERATION OF
CANCELING THE
DECEMBER 26, 1981
COUNCIL MEETING
APPROVED
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
(
¡
l Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
~.
.
e
~
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLSt TEXAS, HELD
IN THE CITY HALLt 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820, NOVEMBER 9, 198¡ - 5:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.t CALL TO ORDER
November 9t 1981.
2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor ROLL CALL
Jim Kenna
Jim Wood
J. C. Hubbard Councilmen
Wiley Thomas
Jim Ramsey
Dave Freeman
Sharyl Groves Councilwoman
Staff:
Chuck Williams City Manager
J,eanette Moore City ,Secretary
Rex McEntire City Attorney
Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager
Richard Albin City Engineer
Margie Nash Planning & Zoning Member
3. The invocation was given by Councilman Jim Ramsey. INVOCATION
4. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbardt
'to appr?ve.the minutes of the October 12, 1981, meeting.
Motion carried 5-0; Councilmen Ramsey and Kenna abstaining
due to absence from the meeting.
5. M~yor Faram'presented Mary Ann Smith, Johnny Kouns and
Charles Goggins with a fice year certificate and service
pin for five years of service in the Fire Department.
Mr. Stephen Slisz of the Public Works Department was not
present.
6. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to postpone action on this item.
Motion carried 7-0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR
MEETING OCTOBER 12t198J
'APPROVED
PRESENTATION OF FIVE
YEAR CERTIFICATE AND
SERVICE TO MARY ANN~
SMITH, JOHNNY KOUNS,
AND CHARLES GOGGINS -
FIRE DEPARTMENT;
STEPHEN SLISZ -
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN
CONSIDERATION OF
APPOINTMENTS TO THE
ZONING BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT
POSTPONED
November 9, 1981
Page 2
Councilman Freeman moved, seéonded by Councilman'Kenna~
to approve PS 81-52.
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 81-52, REQUEST OF
CAMBRIDGE COMPANY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
FOR FINAL PLAT OF
LOT 2, BLOCK 1,
NORTHP ARK PLAZA
ADDITION, 3RD SECTION
APPROVED
7. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning
Commission had recommended approval ,subject to the
Engineers' comments and the granting of· an additional
utility easement.
Motion carried 7-0.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to ,approve PS 81-57.
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 81-57, .REQUEST OF
WEITZMAN-NORRICH JOINT
VENTURE FOR RE-PLAT
OF BLOCK 2R, RICHFIELD
PLACE, COMMERCIAL
ADDITION
APPROVED'
8. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval subject to the
Engineers' comments.· The applicant had agreed to sign
a covenant'for street improvements on Davis Boulevard.
Councilman Wood. stated that according to the letter from
Lone Star Gas Company they took exception to this plat.
Mr. Dick Perkins, Teague, NaIl and Perkins, Consulting
Engineers, 210 West 6th, Fort Worth, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Perkins S'tated that at the Planning and Zoning
meeting his client agreed to grant the easements.
Mr. Perkins stated the Utility Company objected
because the easements were not shown on the plat.
Mr. Perkins stated they would grant the easements
and any additional easements that were required.
Councilman Kenna amended his motion, Councilman
Ramsey amended his second, to state "subject to
having all easements shown on the preliminary plat."
Amended motion carried 7-0.
Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to approve PS 81-59.
PLANNING & ZONING -
PS 81-59, REQUEST OF
RICHARD KURTZ FOR
FINAL PLAT OF LOT 2,
BLOCK 2, A.G. WALKER
ADDITION
APPROVED
9. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning
Commission had recommended approval subject to the
Engineers' comments. All comments had been met.
Motion carried 7-0.
City Manager Williams stated Mrs. Parker was advised
she did not have to be present.
CONSIDERATION OF
GRANTING AN APPEAL
HEARING ON PZ 81-31 -
MRS . SID PARKER
GRANTED
10. Mayor Faram asked if there was anyone present to
represent this request.
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to grant Mrs. Sid Parker an appeal hearing on PZ 81-31,
to be heard on December 14, 1981.
.
¡
I
11.
Motion carried 7-0.
Mr. Claude Byrd, 7924 Map1ewood, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Byrd asked the Council to grant his request for
an appeal hearing.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman,
to grant Mr. ,Claude Byrd an appeal hearing on PZ 81-32,
to be heard on December 14, 1981.
Motion carried 7-0.
12. Mr. Cecil Forester appeared before the Council.
.
r
I
!
.
Mr. Forester stated that three bids were received.
Trinity Company bid on a John Deere; Clemmons Tractor
Company bid a Fprd, and Case Power Company bid a Case.
Mr. Forester stated he had reviewed the specifications
and found that John Deere did not meet the specifications
with respect to the type of transmission and tires,
and did not submit a vandalism package. Ford did not
include the vandalism package and did not meet
specifications with respect to tires.
Mr. Forester stated that since he had made his
recommendation to the Council he found that Case
had not meet specifications with respect to the
wet disc hydraulic brakes. Mr. Forester stated
the Case did have hydraulic brakes and he mistakenly
read it as wet. Mr. Forester stated he would still
recommend the bid be awarded to Case.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Forester if he considered the
items critical in the bids.
Mr. Forester replied yes.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Forester if he recommended rejecting
all bids until the specifications were met.
Mr. Forester stated he had no objections to the bids
being rejected.
Councilman Freeman asked what the value of the vandalism
was.
Mr. Forester stated that he did not know the value
in the terms of dollars.
Mr. James Thrasher, Representative for John Deere,
7516 Oakridge Drive, appeared before the Council.
November 9, 1981
Page 3
CONSIDERATION OF
GRANTING AN APPEAL
HEARING ON PZ 81-32-
CLAUDE BYRD
GRANTED
CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING OF BID FOR
BACKHOE-LOADER
POSTPONED
November 9t 1981
Page 4 .
Mr. Thrasher stated he was aware that Case was going
to be recommended and really ,could not understand why.
Mr. Thrasher stated Trin.ity was $1,134.00 cheaper and
they felt they had more tractor to'offer. Mr. Thrasher
stated they did not have the torque converter transmission
simply because John Deere did not feel it was necessary
in this type of tractor and felt John Deere was more
economical.
Councilman Wood asked Mr. Thrasher if he was saying
John Deere ,did not have the torque converter transmission.
Mr. Thrasher stated they did not have it in this type
of ,tractor,..
Councilman Wood asked if it took a qualified person
to operate ~he type of transmission John Deere had.
Mr. Thrasher stated the City currently had a John Deere
tractor and as 'far' as he knew had no problems with it.
Councilman Wood asked Mr. Thrasher if ,Trinity had a
vandalism package.
Mr. Thrasher stated the could manufactor a side-shield
which was what Mr. Forester was talking about in a
vandalism package. Mr. Thrasher stated they did offer
the protectio,n f,or the gages. Mr. Thrasher stated the
only thing he took exception to was the engine side
shields. Mr. Thrasher stated they could manufacture
the side shields, it would be a custom job and he did
not know the cost..
Councilman Wood asked if John Deere offered the wet
brake system.
Mr. Thrasher replied yes.
Councilman Hubbard asked Mr. Thrasher if it was' his
company's policy that if a company had a piece of
equipment that broke down and Trinity had a piece
of equipment on the yard, would they let the company
use it while their's was being reparied at no charge.
Mr. Thrasher replied yes.
Councilman Freeman asked if the type of equipment
Trinity bid had a spring type clutch or a hydraulic.
Mr. Thrasher stated the tractor had a clutch; it
was a standard direct drive transmi~sion.
November 9, 1981
Page 5
Mr. Forester stated reference was made that prior to the
bids going out that Case· was going to be recommended and
that was not true.
Councilman Freeman mov~d, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to postpone action on this item until the first Council
meeting in Dece~ber.
Motion carri,ed 7-0.
13. Cecil Forester, Director Public Works/Utilities, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. ,Forester stated. bids were sent to ten firms in
addition to being advertised in the newspaper. Eight
bids were received. Mr. Forester stated North Loop
Dodge was low b"idder with a bid of $22,453.3.5, but
did not meet the specifications. Mr. Forester stated
all others met the ~pecifications. Mr. Forester
stated he recommended the bid of Sam Lingard Ford in
the amount of $22~625.04.
CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING BID FOR
THREE (3) 1/2 TON
PICKUPS (UTILITY
DEPARTMENT)
APPROVED
Councilwoman Groves asked what vehicles would be
replaced.
.,
Mr. Forester stated the new vehicles would replace
three older mode~ pickups.
Councilwoman Groves 'asked what 'would be done with the
vehicles that were being replaced.
Mr. Forester stated they could, possibly be passed to
the meter readers pr sold a auction.
Coun~ilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to accept ~he bid of Sam Lingard Ford in the amount of
$22,625.04. .'
Motion carried 7-0.
14. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve payment to Aus'tin Road Company in the
amount of $1,350.00.
Motion carried 7-0.
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT TO
AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$1,350.00 - BOOTH
CALLOWAY ROAD
APPROVED
15. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve Resolution No. 81-20.
,
Motion carried 7-0.
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION CASTING VOT
FOR DIRECTOR FOR
TARRANT COUNTY
APPRAISAL DISTRICT
APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO. 81-20
16. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve Qrdinance No. 928.
f
\
Motion carried 7-0.
17. Mr. Charles Scoville, Representativ~, Cambridge Development
Company, appeared before the Council.
Mr~ Scoville stated he was late getting to the meeting
and wanted to. inquire as to what action was taken on
PS 81-53, ~inal plat 'of Lot 2, Block 1,' Northpark
Plaza.
Mayor Faram advised, Mr. Scoville the ,plat was approved
subject to the Engineer's co~ents.
18. Mayor Faram adj ourne4 the.. meeting of November 9, 1981.
r
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secrètary
Nqvember 9, 198i
Page 6
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORDINANC~ NO. 381,
RULES, RE,GULATIONS,
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
FOR THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS WATER
AND SEWER SYSTEM
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 928
CIT~ZEN PRESENTATION
ADJOURNMENT
Dic~ ¥aram - Màyo'r,
.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND' HILLS'
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
~
~")'r the Meeting
December 14, 1981
~ at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. loop 820.
, .
NUMBER· ITEM .. . , ACTION TAKEN
,; .. ~ ,.
' , , - ; ,
PRE COUNCIL
6:30 P.M.
,.
1. ' Discussion on Water Rates - Possible (Closed)
LitiQation
, ,- COUNCIL
.'
7·30 P.M.
., r~ll tn Ornpr
-
2 Roll Call
."
............-..-... - . 1
~- lnvocation
..--
4 n Juvrl of Minutes of the Reaular
M
~~-_....:_- .. .L 23 1981
IVlf-If-Il I fI U 'H V ~II J~r ..
~ f:i t i zpn '" ("" ~ I L.d t i on-Snow He; ahts
I I " A"--iñtion-Mr~. Barbara
II I~I
Mrl(inl~v
V'
h PLANNING & ZONING-APPEAL HEARING
- Public HearinQ - PZ 81-32 ~ ~uest of
-
--" Claude BYrd~ Byrd Automotive. to
. rezone Lot '6. Block 23. Clearview
Addition fromlF-9-0ne Family Dwellinq
to Commercial
I
Page 2
.
F(J}~ the Meeting
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
December 14, 1981
~ at 7:30p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMB ER' '. ITEM , . ACTION·'TAKEN,
7. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 81-32 ' ,
8. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING (Postponed at the November 23, 1981
PZ 81-35, Request of Aubrey. Brother~.to . Meeti ng)
rezone Tract 3A, Abstract 1150~ David
Moses .,Survev from Aari cul ture to·
--
IF-12-1800_ 1F-9-1700 and IF-9-1500
'- . . -.
9. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 81-35
. . - -
-
10. PLANNING' & ZONING'"..- PS 81-60, Request of
J. McOil Company for final plat of Lot 1,
. Block 2, A. G. Walker Addition
11. PLANNING & ZONING - PS 81-63, Request
,"
of Delma & J. R. PhilliRS for final plat
--- ~ - --.,-. ,.-- .- ~---
of Lots 1, ,2, & 3, Block 34~ Col'eqe
Hill ~Addition
12& PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 81-37 It Reaues't of Amon T. Adcock to
rezone Tract 7, Abstract 321~ William
rox ~ I~vev from Aariculture to IF-9-1500
13 _ Con~;d~Jdtion of Ordinance for PZ 81-37
..
14. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
~
-" PZ 81-38, Request of Tenneco Oil
ComDanv to· rezone Block 5, Snow HeiQhts
North Addition from Local Re ta i 1 to' Lbca 1
Retail-Soecific Use-Sale of Beer for'
Off-Premise ConsumDtion
Page 3
CITY OF NORTH RrCHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
.
::1);" the Meeting
December 14, 1981
tat 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. loop 820.
NUMBER, : ITEM , .' ACTION TAKEN
15. Consideratioh of Ordinance for PZ 81-38
16. PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 81-39, Request of Canadian Texas
Properties, Inc., to rezone Tract 1G,
and portions of Tracts 1, lA, IB, & IC,
Abstract 1588, J. M. Vandusen Survey
from .Local Retail and Multiple Family to
Commercial
. . .. .-# ...... .................-
17 C:on,s i dera ti on of Ordinance for PZ 81-39
JR PIANNTNh & ZONING - PS 81-67, Request of
.I
Trinn l':()r 'lJur'rj t i on for fi na 1 p 1 a t of
Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1, Tapp Addition
"
. - . '---.. . ._- - -
19. Consideration of payment to Stolaruk
, ,
-- Corporation fo~ Davis Boulevard Water!
Sys~em Extension in the amount of
$204,246.00
20. Consideration of Awarding bid for Tractor
Loadèr-backhoe
21. Consideration of Resolution transferring
$112,275.00 from Restricted Reserve,
to departmental payroll accounts
,
-.
22. Consideratlon of Ordinance Amendin.g
the Water & Sewer Rules, Requlations,'
Policies and Procedures
Page 4
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
.
fOr' the Meeting
December 14, 1981
~ at 7:30 p.m.. in the City Hall, 7301 N'.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER, ITEM , . ACTION' TAKEN
23. Citizen Presentation
24. Adjournment
.' . . ~..,.....-......,... -
.. ----
"
- ~ .--.-- ....-- ... ,~
-
-,
-'
--
---... -, >~ -
r
( .
.
I
.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN
THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820
NOVEMBER 23, 1981 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Fafam called the meeting to order November 23, 1981,
at 7:30 .
I
CALL TO ORDER
2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor ROLL CALL
Jim Kenna
Jim Wood
J. C. Hubbard Councilmen
Wi1ey Thomas
Jim Ramsey
,Sharyl Groves Councilwoman
Staff:
Chuck Williams City Manager
Jeanette Moore City Secretary
Rex McEntire Ci ty At'torney
Richard Albin City Engineer
Absent:
Dave Freeman Councilman
3. The invocation was given by Councilman Jim Ramsey.
Mayor Faram stated that with the Council's permission,
he would depart from the agenda for a citizen presentation.
Mrs. Rose Connolly appeared before the Council and introduced
Corbett Ni cho 1 eson, Courtney Ni c'ho leson and Angi e She 1 ton.
Mrs. Connolly stated the children wished to present the
Mayor, City Manager and Fire Chief with a poster expressing
the neighborhood~sappreciation for the city's help during
the flood.
4. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve the minutes of the November 9, 1981, regular
meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
5. Mayor Faram presented Mr. Steven Slisz of the Public Works
Department a five year certificate and service pin.
6. Mayor Faram advised the Council he had appointed
Mr. David Casey as City Judge on Novemeber 11, 1981,
and the asked the Council for ratification of this
appointment.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to approve the appointment of Mr. David Casey as City
Judge.
Motion carried 6-0.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR
MEETING NOVEMBER 9, I
1981
APPROVED
PRESENTATION OF FIVE
YEAR CERTIFICATE AND
SERVICE PIN TO
STEVEN SLISZ -
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
RATIFICATION OF
APPOINTMENT OF
MR. DAVID CASEY AS
CITY JUDGE
APPROVED
November 23, 1981-
Page 2
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to approve the appointment of Mr. George Pederson
to the Civil Service Commission.
CONSIDERATION OF
APPOINTMENT OF
MR. GEORGE PEDER~v~
TO THE CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION
APPROVED
7. Mayor Faram appointed Mr. George Pederson to
to the Civil Service Commission and asked for
Council approval.
Motion carried 6-0.
Mayor Faram advised there was a legal petition on
Item 10 and 11 and would require a 3/4 majority vote
of the Council for approval. Mayor Faram stated that
since there was one Council member absent he would
give the applicant the option to postpone this
request until all members were present.
Mr. Dick Perkins, Consulting Engineer, advised the
Council his client would perfer to postpone this
request until all Council members were present.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Counçilman Wood,
to postpone item 10 and 11 until December 14, 1981.
Councilman Ramsey asked if the petition would still
be valid.
Mayor Faram stated yes.
Motion carri,ed6-0.
Mr. Barfield stated he felt this particular zoning
was applicable for the area. Mr. Barfield stated
he had the consent of all the people that lived
adjacent to property. Mr. Barfield stated that
Mr. Bill Ratliff, who was not present, had signatures
of all the property owners within 200 feet of the
property who were in favor of the I-F~8-1400.
Mayor Faram asked Mr, Barfield if there was a proposed
water line for this subdivision.
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 81-33, REQUEST O~'
JOHN BARFIELD TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 2, ABSTRACT
1150, DAVID MOSES
SURVEY FROM ARICUL-
TURE TO 1F-8-1400
8. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak to please come forward.
Mr. John Barfield, 416 Louella, Hurst, appraredbefore
the Council ·
Mr. Barfield stated there was and he thought the
city wanted an easement through the subdivision.
Mr. Barfield stated he was prepared to grant the
city an easement through the property.
.
.
\
.
\
Mr. Barfield stated he had already granted an
easement through the portion on the nor~heast
, corner ,where ~he city had installed a 11ne.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Barfield if he intented to
install the water line and the city pay the cost
of oversizing.
Mr. Long, Consulting Engineer, stated it wou~d
depend on who got there first, if the city dld
then Mr. Barfield would pay pro rata. ,If Mr. Barfield
got there first then the city would pay for the oversizing.
Councilman Wood asked the City Engineer if two lines,
a westerly and southerly pipe line cominq through the
cul-de-sac~ could be served by one pipe line.
Mr. Albin stated yes, it could be served both from the east
and west.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
of this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faranl closed
the public hearing.
9. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to
approve PZ 81-33, Ordinance No. 929.
Motion carried 6-0.
10. Postponed
11. Postponed.
November 23, 1981
Page 3
CONDSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 81-33
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 929
PLANNING & ZONING -
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 81-35, REQUEST OF
AUBREY BROTHERS TO
REZONE TRACT 3A,
ABSTRACT 1150, DAVID
MOSES SURVEY FROM
AGRICULTURE TO
IF-9-1800, 1F-9-1700
AND 1F-9-1500
POSTPONED
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 81-35
POSTPONED
12. M~or Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
There was no one present to speak on this request.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition of this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
13. Mayor Faram stated the Planning and Zoning Commission
had recommended approval of this request subject to
a copy of the advertisement being approved by the
staff.
Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman
Wood, to approve PZ 81-36, Ordinance No. 930.
Councilman Kenna stated that since the sign was
already there and they would would only be covering
the existing sign, he could see no reason why the
the request should not be granted.
Motion carried 6-0.
14. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas,
to ratify Resolution No. 81-21.
Motion carried 6-0.
15. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve the bid of TML, effective date January 1, 1982,
through September 1982, and that $7.25 per month, per
employee for a total of $12,238.00 for nine months
be paid for from Reserve for Contingencies.
Motion carried 6-0.
November 23, 1981
p.age 4
PLANNING & ZONINr .
PUBLIC HEARING -
PI 81-36, REQUEST OF
NATIONAL ADVERTISING
COMPANY TO REZONE
A PORTION OF BLOCK 3,
SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH
ADDITION FROM LOCAL
RETAIL TO LOCAL RETAIJ
SPECIFIC USE~BILLBOAR[
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 81':'36
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 930
RATIFICATION OF
RESOLUTION NO. 81-21
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN
BLOCK GRANT
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING BID FOR
EMPLOYEES LIFE AND
HEALTH INSURANCE
APPROVED
16. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to cancel the December 28, 1981, Council meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
17. None
18.' Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of November 23, 1981.
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
November 23, 1981
Page 5
CONSIDERATION OF,
CANCELING THE
REGULAR SCHEDULED
COUNCIL. MEETING
DECEMBER 28, 1981
APPROVED '
CITIZEN PRESENTATIO
ADJOURNMENT
.J.' ) '.
'..:,' ,~ ~
.5
·e
.
. . .... ...
" eity'of ~orth 1licWandW11s' ::::<,:,:-::':'~8r~îl~
ßtar of the "Metroplex .
. . .
·e
'.
QIertifitatt . of ~erítite '.
. .
. .
·THE STATE OF TEXAS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND H,ILLS
TO:
JOHNNY KOUNS
IN RECO,GNITION OF
. FIVE
FIRE
TO T8E CITY IN THE
DATED AT NORTH ~ICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS, 9:th
. ~~: -;-
NOVEMBER! 1981 ~ ". ',' ':.::. .
.:::... ;¡;~ . : ,
May<?r ..' .
·
.. . .
·e
'4 ... ..
..
.'. ~ .
. .
.
·
·e
"e
Wanda Calvert
Planning &,Zoning Coo dinator
Appointment of Zoni,ngBoard of Adjustment Members
I have two Zoning Board of , Adjustment members Wh()'S terms expired
May 1, 1981./rThey are H. B . Helton andJesse~r{(inge.
\ -.k-
The request for appointment as on the April 27th, \1981 Council ågenda
but was passed over. \
These Board members are ppointed for a two year per\od.
Thanks, \
\\
City of jXðrth Richland Hills/
TO:
,Chuck Williams
City Manager
FROM:
SUBJECT:
2/ ~k-
, -1 Orr:--",
Jf: I ,{)t~.
l .~ "'-", .'
f ../" ~ /Æ...-~"J
¡ .' ...
i / ." "r l~. ì~ .
I " ,-;{l" ' !
.,; .} I!?j>~ /
1j.Æ:'7 j, /
t ' ,"l,( .J I
<.-, ,. . ,,/"
A
....., ,
I" ,if "
r ~ ":,.. ¿. J .(·~·1"·'
(~' "'~":../~~_.r-' /'" ' '
/ / I
/ I
/
/
/
// ///
//
/
VOctober"s, 1981
REF: PZM-D012-8!
";j-'-Y- , ~- J
\~~'
i~"'i
&-.~~,)
~,,, ~..--
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
e
-
-
---
'Chuck Williams~
C'ity Manager
FROM:' Wanda Calvert,
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
DATE: Nov. 3, 1981
TO:
" ,
SUBJECT: P & Z ,Cases to be heard by City Co,uncil Novembe"r '9, 1981
PS 81-52 Request of Cambridge Co. Dev. Corp. for
final plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Northpark
Plaza.Addition~ 3rd Section.
:.
PS 81~57·
Re'quest of Weitzman-Norrich Joint
Venture for replat of Block 2R, Richfield
Place Commerctal Additi·on.
. . .
PS 81-5,9
, Request of Richard Kurtz for final plat of
Lot 2, Block 2, A. G. Walker Addition.
, .
. ~. -...
;." }
, ,
..
,',
"
. .
. .
, .
~ :."
~. . ,'.'
.- . . .
, .
. ,
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
.. -..- -----.. --- -:..... .. ...
,- .-,-- '-'-y- _._--...'-'
._._1.. . #._ __..._.__._.~.
-----._~-_..__.. . ..---'--- ~-'-" --,~...._-,-_._.,.~-_... --. -~-_._......,....~..._-----_..~--_...---.._-----~.~._--~
·
e
-
DATE: Nov. 3, 1981
t'-t
I
SUBJECT:
PS 81~52 Final Plat of ~ot 2, Block 1, Northpark Pla~a Additìon~
3rd Section.
DEPARTMENT:
Planning and Zoning
This proper' zy is located at the northeast corner of" Rufe Snow Drive
BACKGROUND: '
and Watauga Road. There was a square portion there that had not been Elatted.
They have agreed to all the Engineer'.s comments and have corrected the 'plat.
They will sign a covenant for the pro rata..
The Planning and Zoning Commission reconmended approval subject to the" Engineer's
comments and the-granting of additional utility easement.
Ii
t""
e(j
J /
~?V-1) . ./~i :~'-~"."
,..-'
I' ,,'
I
.. ~ ..."'1:
i 1,/f /#il~ ""
II .,,'/ v yo .
I/b/
~'
CITY COUNCIL ~CTION IŒQUlRED:
ADcroval of final plat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
/) /" ,/ ,,? ~ .l'
__~I/t:f-~~ l,_,H~.t/~f
---------~---------------------------------------------------------~-------------------
.
(*' . ,--.-..-"'.--
\e
Ce
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
October 22, 1981
2.
3.
(/
P¥81-51
ApPROVED
PS 81-52 " .
PS 81-53
"
~/
(
~" "
c'
said II-Mr. Moak is changing the zoning to
, commercial on the plat; #2- is the City
Staff's responsibility; #3 & 4-theY~ãVe no
objections to; #5 regarding the n.eeél of a
permit from the highway depa~~éñt for drive-
way cuts-if, there is any ~w constr~ction,
they will get one; and~6 regarding the
septic system, the .wner has had no problem
with the septic stem.
Mr. Hanno said it looked like the lot lines
on t plat go through the middle of the
b · ·dings. He .asked if ,the bu; 1 di ngs shared
a convnon wall.
Mr. Stembridge said they did.
Mr. Greenfield stated T.E.S.C.O. had requested
additional easement. .
Mrs. Nash moved to approve PS 81-51 subject to
the Engineer~s comments and the additional
T.E.S.C.O. easement.
Mr. Tucker seconded the motion and the motion
carried 5-0,.
'(.""--~~,. Reque~t.of C, ambridge C~:_:.Q,'~,.)r. Corp. for, final
'~-.* _nn_ p1at-,rrtl5f 2~B1j~';:~l';-~'''Northpark Plaza
/1 Addition, Section 3.
,,/
I
.....
Request of Cambridge Co. Dev.' Corp. for final
plat of Lots 3 & 4, Block 1, Northpark Plaza
Addition, Phase II.
Mr. Charles Scoville with Cambridge Co. Oev.
Corp. came forward.
Mr.Scovi·lle stated they had received the
City Engi'neer's 'comments and 'would, have the
corre¿tions made in a few days. He said in
regard to the permit from Mobil Oil, they
were contacted and they said they do not give
a permi"t, but woul d furnish a letter to thi s.
Mr. Scoville'said the other Engineerls comment
was regardi"ng pro rata. He said they would like
to si,gn an agreement to pay the pro rata prior
to getting a building permit. Mr. Scoville
said they \'lould ltke to pay the pro rata up to
the Phase II line, then not pay on Phase III
until they come in for a' building permi,t.
. ,
//
/
,/"/.'..
(.' /
t '
(
'-,
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
October 22, 1981
(
(0
Mr. Bronstad said they could sign a covenant
for the streets, but on water and sewer, they
would have to pay when they get a building
permit.
Mr. Scoville said they would like to do this
in phases.
Mr. Bronstad said if its one lot, they will
have to pay it all, but if it is two lots,
'they could divide it up.
Mr. "Bowen stated it just shows one lot.
PS 81-52
APPROVED
Mr. Scoville said then, he would like to
postpone PS 81-53..
Mr. Bowen moved to approve PS 81-52 subject "
to the Engineer's comments and ~e additional
utility easem~nt.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and the
motion carried 5-0.
PS 81-53
POSTPONED
Mr. Hannon .moved, second ' to
post requested by the developer.
,The moti'oncarrìed 5-0.
\ r
4.
PS 81-56
Request of Richland Enterprises for prelim"
plat of Holiday North, Section 9.
Owen D. long, Engineer, came f9-~ard to
represent Hamm & "sand~ñeir request.
Mr. long said this s just a one lot. tract
that was left a they don't know what they
will put 0 t; they might put duplexes, but
are noivSure, now.
r. long said since this lot joins Block 10,
he would like to change the legal description
to lot 5, Block 10, Holi"day North, Section 9.
Mr. long sai"d they would grant the addtti"onal
uti: 1 î:ty easement.
Mr. Greenfield asked if Mr. long agreed to all
the Engi'neer I, s comments.
Mr. long stated they did.
The Cambridge Companies Development Corporation
4950 Westgrove Drive. Suite 120 Dallas, Texas 75248 Telephone 214 931 7311
fI
Cambridge
e
'e
Ms. Walda Calvert
Planning & 'Zoning Department
City of North Richland Hills
Post Office Box 13305
North'Richland Hills, Texas 76118
November 9, 1981
RE: Lot 2, Block 1, North Park Plaza Addition, Section 3
Dear MS. Calvert:
Reference is made to the letter dated October 12, 1981, from
Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. to the Planning & Zoning Com-
mission"of the City of North Richland Hills concerning Lot 2,
Block 1, North Park Plaza Addition, Section 3. 'Attached is
a copy of said letter., The Cambridge Companies Development
Corporation has reviewed all of the engineer's comments and
has complied with them.
If you should have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
, I
M
William D. Parsons
President
/tk
I
~ï
~I
..ñtl
. -I
~I
~ 1-
~ I '1.5
~.I
. ,
ðl
~I
uJl
~I
~\
~I
2)1
, ~ I
(PI
.' uJ 1
., ~ I
CCI
~I
,
é'
r:
c-I
CP
;'
.
.
45'
~
'cD
G1
"
, ~
(P
___...:..:-J
UJ
in:
4
ëo
,C)
~
ð
~
-----,
1._ ,
, 'LS'
,
\
1
So-
~
" . ~I
t-
',. Ie
." {
, I '.
Î
,
I
,
I
,
-I .'- . .
1 ~E.S.~Q. /1:1~;~~X-:,L : .
I .' ..... .'. . ~n._~..<.:~j
I '5~9~S~ \S"ë .. ":.:' ..'. - 't\~.~~.. -- -J .... - . .
. ..
, , \<o~.~~,
M,JfT¡.I "A~ ~ P¿ A:t A
31lø . Sçc .,.~. ~.
A ""~SGA
MAr~G- Lt>\ 't
37 Y Y::>'-~c.'A \ '1?8 8.!lit ~ ~
, ~ 1
, ' ¡ }, I-
. 4\, ~~(ò'X' Sq.~\. G.'C'~s ~ I
. 'l.~)9~ß-ß~ sC\.~\. \\~'c ~ ~
F P 1l1-/ð-:/.o If Il.H . .¿ ~
. - £
$ Fp()rJ.fls.&-IÝJ~~r Po ~..~g.Sfg!~ ~
Ols -r,uß"^ Í/ðAJ ~A C-.I L' -r, ~ ~ . 5' I
~
. \(' .
..-0 ...
A,
'"~ - _.~
... .. ..
. . '
. -
\.~, \.-. ~ .
'. ~ ~~~\\\ ?~R¥-.. "?\ ¡
.. . . ~o\. ~ß'ò-\'1.~ ?~ î
" ~
~
à .
\ .
- I
-1
, -
,
. I
I
I
I III
t ~
()
4J
~
o
.LJ
L)
(j)
J
\ .
~ '
~ -
~
(1J
~
cJ
;õ
CÞ
P
L)
~
ë-
ú)
ci
<t
"..
------
. . ..........
,
, \~~,.ðr~
S~.~ 'Oeò\c.o.\eó ~~~s~'("ee\-
:0
ð
cJ
(j)
.",-
'2.\~. \Jö'
~ W þ..\ ~\jc;~ - SM \.\\-\Fl~LD
Sß9° 5'1: ~~'N
.. . '. - . ..... .-... - ..
AS'
r---
,
I
I
I
,
----- -- ---- - ---- ----- - ---
(
("
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort \Vorth-Dallas
October 12, 1981
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North R;chland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820 .
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-922, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
NORTHPARK PLAZA, SECTION 3, LOT 2,
BLOCK 1, FINAL PLANS, PS 81-52,
(GRID 85)
e
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement along
with the Notary Certification should be fully executed before
approval.
2. The Surveyor's Certificate should be signed.
3. We would refer'You to our review letters, dated March 10,
April 14, and May 4, 1978, concerning pro rata and Developer
participation in water, sewer, drainage and street paving
improvements on Rufe Snow Drive and Watauga Road.
4. A small scale vicinity map should be 'shown on the final plat.
5. Utility cOlnpanies should be consulted regarding any requirements
they may have for additional easements on this lot.
6. The existing zoning (L.R.) should be shown on the plat.
7. 25-foot building set back lines on Rufe Snow and Watauga
should be shown on the plat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
plea do not hesitate to call.
t:
RWA:mh
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
e
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
e
.
·e
\.
(
') .
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLÓ·WERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort \'\Iorth·Oallas
r~ay 4, 1978
Planning & ,Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
730IN.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject:, 3-922, ClïY'OF:NORTH:RICHLAND HILLS,
NORTH PARK PLAZA,· PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT
"
We have received the revised preliminary and final plat and construction
plans for the subject subdivision for our review, and offer our comments
as follows:
1. We would remind you of our earlier comments concerning pro-rata
considerations for the water lines in Watauga Road and Rufe Snow
Drive and future street construction of these two (2) thorough-
fares (See Item 3 and 4 of our letter of March 10,'. 1978). .
2. We would also remind you of necessary .storm drain escrow as
mentioned in comment No.4 of our letter of April 4~ 1978.
The other items of our April 4~ 1978, letter have been met, and \~le \~lould,
therefore, recommend this sub,division for your approval after these above
items are properly addressed.
JRP-hr
cc: Mr. Gene Riddle, City Manager
Mr. Ray Britton, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
600 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367
( . '. f
I ,~\
,. . a
.I ..... ..'
(c
~.'
. KNOWLTON~ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort vVorth-Dallas
Apri 1 4, 1978
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301, N.E. Loo~820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-922, CITY: OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
NORTH PARK PLAZA:Þ PRELIMINARY & '
FINAL' PLAT
We have received the revised preliminary and final plat and construction
plans fQr the subject subdivision for our review, and offer our comments
as follows:
e.
,1. Se\'/er line 112" should be an 8-inch line 'in lieu of the' 6-inch
line as shown on the plans, since this is commercial property.
2. Th,ere are two (.2) fi re hydrants noted IIfuture" on the p1 ans.
These will provide adequate fire proteLtion to this property
when constructed, but sufficient fire hydrants should be con-
structed now in order to afford adequate protection to that
portion of this property \'hich isbei.ng presently platted.
3. We would remind you of our earlier comments concerning pro-rata·
considerations for the water lines in Watauga Road and Rufe Snow
Drive and future street construction of th'ese t\'/O thoroughfares. .
(See Items 3 and 4 of our letter of r4arch 10, 1978.) ,
4. When Rufe Snow Drive and .Watauga Road are constructed~ storm
drainage pipe will have to be installed along a portion of the
east 'and nortn sides~ respectively, of these streets. Therefore~
we would recommend that this developer escrow one-half the cost'
of such improvements. We would ,estimate the followi~g:.
a. 24~inch pipe at $18.00/L.F. for a total distance of 150 feet
equals $2,700.00.
b. One (1) lO-foot inlet o~Rufe Snow Drive for an estimated
cost of $1,200.00.
e
.
This would place the escrow amount at $1~950.00. As the northern
portion of the preliminary platted area is developed, further
600 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
, , , ,
~ -, \.
..... .,..
((
(C.. .
P.age 2 -- 4/4/78 -- ,Planni.ng & ZQni.ng Conmission
. .
consideration should be given to escrowing drainage funds 'for
the proposed structure under Rufe Snow and drainage poi pe to the e
north along Rufe Snow. .
Should you have any further questions concerning the review of this sub-
division, please do not hesitate to call.· .
J.
JRP-hr
cc: Mr. Gene Riddle, City r~an.ager
t4r. Ray 'Britton, Director of Public Works
·Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
e
- - .' .-.
'.... '
-.... .... ,."
,-~ ..
,-
.,
, "
, '
e
·
e
°e
1'(
\
"
({o
'.. '.
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort \~orth..Dallas
March 15~ 1978 .
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-922, CITY OF NORTHRICHLAND HILLS,
NORTHPARK PLAZA~
REVISED PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT
We have received the revised preliminary and final plat for the subject
subdivision for our review, and we are unable to complete our review
until such time that this developer complies with Paragraph D(13),
~age 15 of the Subdivision Ordinance.
We would also recommend that a drainage runoff coefficient of 0.95
be used for this, particular, property due to the large amount of
pavi,ng.
JRP:mh
cc: Mr. Gene Riddle, City Manager
Mr. Ray Britton~ Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
600 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
~1P1
e~-
i~.
, \,
e
'e
.' ,
)'
~~.
x~:'
'" .
.
KNOWLTON~ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort \;Vorth-Oal1as
March 10, 1978
Pl ann; ng& Zon; ng Cornmi 55 i on
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas '76118
Subject: 3-922, CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS~
NORTH'.PARK PLAZA, PRELlr·1INARY PLANS AND
FINAL PLAT
~Ie have received the preliminary and final plat for the subject subdivision
for our review and offer our comments as follows:
1'. Contour lines have been sho\'n on the preliminary plans~
but no information has been submitted for drainage
calculations on the , final plat. The storm water from
this property passes through storm drainage pipe under
Rufe Sno,w to the north and drainage calculations should
be shown to indicate the adequacy of this pipe.
.' ..
2. No construction plans have been submitted with the final
plat; therefore, \·¡e are unable to determine the proposed
point of sewer service to this property- . Pro-rata may be
required depending on the location of the proposed service~
or an additional se\'/er 1 ine may have to be construc'ted by
this developer.
3. We would recommend that this developer escrow his pro-rata
share'of the existing 1611 water line in Rufe Snow. \~e \'/ould
estimate pro-rata at $4'.00/1- f. for a total di stance of 250 feet.
He should also pay his pro-rata share"of the existing 12" \'¡ater
1 ine in Watauga-Smithfield Road., We \'Iould estimate this pro-
rata at $4.00/1.f. for'a total distance of 566.66 feet.
. .
'4. We would further recommend that the develop~r be required to
pay his pro-rata share, of the future street construction of
Rufe Snow and Watauga-SmithfieldRoad. Rufe Snow is planned
to be 61 feet wide, and Watauga-Smithfield is planned to be
two (2) 37 foot roadways separated by a median.,
600 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 ~ METRO/267-3367
_ _
1
( 't.
Page 2 -- March 10, 1978 -- Planning & Zoning Commission
5. As no construction plans have been submitted, we are unable
to determine whether adequate fire protection has been
afforded this property.
Should there be any further questions concerning the review of this sub-
division, please do not hesitate to call .
J JICHARD PERKINS, P.E.
JRP:mh
cc: Mr. Gene Riddle, City Manager
Mr. Ray Britton, Director of Public Uorks
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
.
e
-
DATE: Nov. 3,1981'
SUBJECT:
PS 81-57 Replat, of Block 2R, Richfield Place Commercial Addition
t '
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
/~ '../
BACKGROUND: This is the Norrich Shopping Center property. They want to expand the
shopping center. There was a large set back building line on the old plat so all they
are doing is moving the building line~ to 10 f~et.
There were requests for additional ,utility easements.
All the Engineer"s comments have been met and the additional utility easements have
been granted. They signed a covenant for the assessments on Davis Blvd.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to the Engineer's
comments and the granting of additional utility easements.
1.1 .
, \
, \
t
/:~
, ~
'(
t¡./\. " ~
I
, I
, f
",'
\
. ~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQUlRED: Approva 1 of rep 1 at.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
-----------------------------------------------------------_~.:~/;~~~~~~--~~~~~---
(
e
, Page 4
p & Z Minutes
October 22, 1981
PS 81-56
APPROVED
(
("
Mrs. Nash moved to approve~S-~1-56-S~
to the Engin~Ommênfš and the additional
eas.emeft~
~---.._~._-...__.-------._--_.__"
/'
\, e
j "e
/'"
/,/
/'"
5.
PS 81-57
PS 81-57
APPROVED
6. '
PS 81-58
7.
PS 81-59
PS 81-58
APPROV ED
r//'
,.4~-
./";-
PS/81-59
/ APPROVED
/"
,.,-"
,"
_//
/-
.//"
The motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the
motion carried 5-0.
Request of Weitzman-Norrich Joint Venture for
replat.of Block 2R~ Richfield Place Commercial
Addition.
Dick Perkins with Teague Nall & Perkins
Engineers came forward to present this request.
Mr. Perkins said ~hey needed this replat to
revise some building lines. .
Mr. Perkins said he had received the 'Engineer's
letter and the requests for additional utili.ty
easements. Hé said they do not mind giving the
easements and they agree to the Engineer's
comments. '
/'/
Mr. Bowen moved to approve PS 81~57 subject to
the Engi'neer's comments and the additional
util;-ty easements.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the
motion carried 5-0.
Request of Richard Kurtz for preliminary ~~
of Lot 2~ Block 2~ A. G. Walker Add~~
/-"
Request of Richard Kurtz for f~ plat of
Lot 2, Block 2, A. G. Walke~dd;tion~
Delbert Stembrìdgeý~ting Engineer'~ came
forward to repr-esent Mr. Kurtz in his requests.
Mr. St~b~: said they agreed to all the
En~l.r1ê'er I s comments.
,// ,
/'/' Mr. Hannon moved to approve PS 81-58 subject
/~ to the Eng-tneer's comments.
The mott6n was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the
motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Tucker moved to approve PS 81-59 subject
to the Engineer's comments.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the
moti'on carried 5-0.
e
e
-
(
(
817 336-5773
H~ !~~CfC¿~ T 1'fþ:~L AI'ff! G~ENR!í!1'f~
October 28, 1981
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Richfield Place Commercial
Addition, Replat
Dear Mayor and Council:
We have received the letters from the City's engineer and
the various utility coropanies relative to this replat. We
are in a9reernent with their comments and agree to comply
with same as a condition of this replat.
Should there be any further questions concerning this
matter, please do not hesitate to call. We will be at the
Council Meeting on November 9, 1981, to answer any questions
relative to this replat.
Very truly your~,
~EAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC.
Perkins, P.E.
JRP/cn
210 West 6th Street, Suite 1200
Executive Plaza Building
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
to,
o '
--
-
e
¡l
(
(
KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
October 16, 1981
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-951, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RICHLAND PLACE COMMERCIAL ADDITION,
BLOCK 2R, REVISED REPLAT,PS 81-57,
(GRID 132)
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. A Surveyor's Certificate Statement as well as Surveyor's
Seal should be affixed to the plat. (See Subdivision
Ordinance, Section 1-04,D.4).
2. The address of the Surveyor and Owner should be shown on
the plat.
3.' All utilities should be advised of the replat.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
~(
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA:mh
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
,
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, "TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
..
I
I
(:
II
HAROLD V. McKINNEY
General Superintendent' of Distribution
Lone Star Gas Company
FORT WORTH D~VISION OF DISTRIBUTION
100 W. Morningside Dr. · Fort Worth, Texas 76110
October 6, 1981
Ms. 1fanda Calvert
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 13305
'North Richland Hills, TX 76118
RE: Block 2 R
Richfield Place
Commercial Addition
Dear Ms. Calvert:
-.e
Pursuant to your correspondence of October 1, 1981,
please be advised that Lone Star Gas Company objects to
the above referenced replat.
The 'lltility easement that extends parrallel and
'adjacent to the east property line is not shown on the
plat that acconpanied your correspondence.
If further information is required, please advise.
You will also find attached copy of Lone Star Gas Comp~'1.Y
map.
Sincerely,
~.
W. L. Simmel
\VIS :mlb
CC: J.D. l1yres
e
.
e
...
f
i
(-
'.
Southwestern Bell
1901 Central Drive
Room 425
Bedford, Texas 76021
October 7, 1 981
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
P. O. Box 13305
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Planning and Zoning Dept.
1~anda Calvert
RE: Richfield Place Commercial Addition
Block 2R
Reference your letter dated October 1, 1981 concerning above
replat.
This replat is returned with additional easement requirements
noted.
~
Any questions on this matter may be referred to Roy Broussard,
on 267-8371 .
~
??t. !".cJ~
M. E. ldlliams
Mgr.-Distr.Svcs.
Eng. (Design)
l I
i.
('
I~
~
l~~
TEXAS.
ELECTRIC H SERVICE
. COMPANY
October 15, 1981
Ms. Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Dept.
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Ms. Calvert:
Texas Electric Service Company has reviewed the proposed replat of Block 2R,
Richfield Place Commercial Addition to the city of North Richland Hills~
Texas.
eAdditional easements are requested as shown in red on the attached plat.
~ -----
If we may be of further assistance, please call.
Yours truly,
k,~. q t- a-JL
Wm. G. Stewart, P.E.
Commercial & Industrial Supervisor
WGS:sdl
Attachment
cc: R. L. Fain
,.
P. O. BOX 970 . FORT \/vORTH. TE>~A3 16~01 · TELEPHONE (817) 336-941~
e
e
-
DATE:
Nov. 3, 1981
SUBJECT:
PS 81-59 Final Plat of Lot 2, Block 2, A. G. Walker Addition
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This propert~ is on Gr:apevine Hwy. next to the U-Haul Trailer place.
c--:--Tfïeprôperty had never been p 1 a tted.
All the Engineer's comments have been met.
,,"
I " -I
/' ~"'::.'.\ , ^ .."..''''-..
,,_~~ ,'" L,' ,',,"
The Plannin~ and Zoning' Commiss'ion recommended approval subject to the Enginee~'s
comments.
(',
o --f
/'
" ¡
"
-
:' i {
/'
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQUIRED:
Approval of final plat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
.- (j,1
( 1 t/. ,',
______________________________________________________________~~~~~~~_ _L~{~~'Lt____
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
October 22, 1981
(
PS 81-56
APPROVED
e
5.
PS 81-57
:'
(,
e
...._....----~...-_.- ....-..-_......
6.
PS 81-58
7.
PS 81-59
PS 81-58
APPROV EO
PS 81-59
APPROVED
, . e
(
C·
Mrs. Nash moved to approve PS 81-56 subject
to the Engineer's comments and the additi 1
easement.
The motion was seconded by Mr. T
motion carried 5-0.
Request of Weitzman-Nor ·ch Joint Venture for
replat.of Block 2R, ·chfield Place Commercial
Addition.
Dick Perkin with Teague Nall & Perkins
Engineer came forward to present this request.
Mr erkins said ~hey needed thi s repl a't to
evise some building lines.
Mr. Perkins said he had received the ,Engineer's -
letter and the requests for add; ti ana 1 utj'li.ty
easements. Hè sai'd they do not mi'nd gi vi n9 the
easements and they agree to the Engineer's
comments.
Mr. Bowen moved to approve PS 81-57 subject to
the Engi"neer's comments and the additional
utility easements.
The moti'on was seconded by r~r. Tucker and the
motion carried 5-0.
Request of Richard Kurtz for preliminary plat
o"f Lot 2, Block 2, A. G. \~alker Addi,tion.
Request of Richard Kurtz for final plat of
Lot 2, Block 2~ A. G. Walker Addition~
Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came
forward to represent Mr. Kurtz in his requests.
Mr. Stembridge said they agreed to all the
Engineer's comments.
Mr. Hannon moved to approve PS 81-58 subject
to the Engtneer's comments.
The motton was seconded by Mr. Tucker and' the
motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Tucker moved to a~prove PS 81-59 subject
to the Engi,neer's comments.
The motton was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the
motion carried 5-0.
(
(. .
II
Delbert R. Stembridge
consulting engineer
October 21, 1981
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-921, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7
A.G. WALKER ADDITION, LOT 22 BLOCK 2,
PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT.
In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter of October 16, 1981,
we offer the following comments:
1. The correct zoning, "Commercial", has been added to
the final plat.
e
2. Tap fees for the existing 6-inch sewer line in Grapevine
Highway (No. 26) have already been collected.
3. The "State Highway 121" designation has been changed
io Highway No. 26 on the final plat.
4. We have verified the fire coverage, and this lot falls
within the required 300-foot radius area of the existing
fire hydrant at Daley and Hwy. 26.
Should there be any further questions regarding this plat,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
, P.E.
cc: Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
e
3729 Flory. North Richland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-1363
... .~
I
e
e
e
(
c
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
October 16, 1981
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-921, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
A.G. WALKER ADDITION, LOT 2, BLOCK 2,
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT PS 81-58 59 ,
GRID 148
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. The preliminary plat shows the zoning of this property to be
local retail. However, the City Zoning Map shows this area to
be zoned commercial. The correct zoning should be verified
and shown on the final plat.
2. The Developer should pay his pro rata share of the existing
6-inch sewer line in Grapevine Highway (No. 26), unless tap fees
have already been collected.
3. The "State Highway 12111 designation shown on the final plat should
be changed to No. 26.
4. Although fire hydrant coverage has not been shown on the utility
layout, this lot appears to be within the required 30Q-foot
radius area of the existing fire hydrant at Daley and Hwy. 26.
This should be verified.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
e¡~w~ ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
·
e
4- \
e
DATE: Nov. 4, 1981
SUBJECT:
PZ 81-31 Zoning request on Lot 1R, Block 3, Richaven Addition
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND:" This is a reg_uest of, Mrs. Sid Parker to rezone Lot lR~ Block 3~
Richaven Addition, from its present classification of IF-9 to Neighborhood Retail.
She, stated she could not rent or sell. this property since the city took part of the
side yard ~to widen the street. The bedroom is too close to the street.
Mrs. Parker wants to put a speciality shop there.
The Planning and Zoning Commissiöndenied Cthi"s request on October 22, 1981.
This property is located at 4801 Grove, the northwest corner of Grove and Bedford-
Euless Road.
Cl~ COUNCIL ~CTION IŒQUlRED:
Grant an'appeal hearinQ.
'r
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
~~--~~~-~~--~---~---~~-~--~~--~----~-~~~~~~~--~~~-----~~~~-~~~--------~-----~--
ð-
p -z... f'/,3/
October 24, 1981'
..
I'Ir. Chuck \~illia~s
City :'ianager
7301 1;. E. Loop 820
lJorth Richlanà Hills, Texas 76118
Dear ::~r .,'¡ illiarns ,
On October 22, 1981 I was àenied a request to. rezone Lot lR
Block 3 Richaven addition froo its present classification
of IF-9 to a proposed classification of reighborhood Retail.
This property is located at 4301 Grove St.
I am·no~·¡ requesting a zoning :lppea1 to the council for a
hearing as soon as possible.
SinCerely(. /
Î)"'. / tjl I.'-~,\,,¡.J::¿~
()~....¡,.,'J /~ ..~(... ,.,,_
r,'Irs. Sid Parker
8225 Grapevine Hi.~J
Ft. ~~orth, (1:o.Rich1and lIills, ) Texas 76118
Phone f/ 281-9111
-
e
.
e
e
DATE:
Nov. 4, 1981
SUBJECT:
PZ 81-32 Zoning request on Lot 6, Block 23, Clearview Addition.
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND:' This is a request of Claude Byrd, Byrd Au~~motive, to rezone Lot 6, ,
Block 23. Clearview Addition~ from its present classification of IF-9 to Commercial.
He wants to use it to 'park cars on for his business.
\ '¡
, ..
The Planninq, and ZoninQ voted 4-1 to deny this feQue~t.
~'.
.
~
t- ~.
This oroo~rty is located on Maolewood Drive and is bounded on the southeast by'
t .
Bvrd Automotive.
I .
.. .,;.,~.~.,;" -",..... ":'.... ..
",
~'.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION IŒQUlRED:
":.;'0
" ,
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
, .
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pz- S'/-3;L
.
e
e
~~
BYRD'S AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE
7924 MAPLEWOOD· P.O. BOX 1840,1 ·,FORT WORTH, TEXAS· 281-2496
October 2), 1981
Mr'.. Chuck Williams, Ci ty Manager'
City of North Richland Hills
Ci ty Hall
North Richland Hill s, Texas 76118
Re: Zoning of Lot 6, Block 2], Clearview Addition from
its present classification of IF-9 to a proposed
classification of commercial
Dear Mr. Williams:
We would like to appeal the denial which was made on the
captioned property by the Planning and Zoning Commission
on October 22, 1981.
We will appreciate any help which you ,may give us in this
matter'.
Very truly yours,
~w.~.~
Claude W.,Byrd, Owner
Byrd's Automotive Service
.
.
.
DATE:
11-2-81 '
Î-- 'oJ
STJBJECT: -.h.~rdiJ.l£ of bid on Baçkhoe-Loader
DEPARTMENT: Utility
BACKGROU~1): Bids were sent_ to eight. (8) firms in addition to our legal notice
which ran for three (3) weeks. Only three (3) bids were recieved as follows:
1. Trinity Equipment Co., (John Deere) $24.719.00
2. Clemons Tractor Co. (Ford) $25.080.00
3. Case Power & Equipment Co. $25.853.00
My recommendation is to award the bid to Case Power & Equipment. Neither
Clemons' 'nor-Trinity's tractor'meets s~écifications. Tractor is'ready
for immediate delivery.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQlTIRED:
Awarding of bid
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES X
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: 11-02-4312 , / ~ .
-------------------------~ (~~~~-------------------------_._-
·
·
·
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND:
DATE:
Awarding of Bid on Three (3) ~ Ton Pickups
Utility
11-2-81
Bids were se&-to ~.Jl..P) firms in addi~iQu.JtD thp 'p~~l por;{'p
which ran for three (3) weekso Eight (8) bids were re~eiYeð. :lR fn'lnuT~·
1. Fort Worth Truck Center (GMC) , $23,655.00
2. Charlie Hillard Ford $23,354.97
3. Texas Motors (Ford) $23,316.00
4. Bruce Lowrie Chevrolet $22,950.00
5. 'Jack Williams $22~659.00
6. Century Chevrolet $22,658.04
7. Sam Lingard Ford $22,625.04
8. North Loop ·Dodge $22,453.35
Rec~mmend award of bid to Sam Lingard Ford. The vehicle that North Loop Dodge
bid does not meet specifications.
Delivery date for Lingard Ford is 45 days.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQUIRED:
Award of bid
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOm~T NUMBER:
YES
NO
x
.-..... _ _...._ ... __ __.- __...- ..............- ...._.......... _ _....,... .-..r.
.
.
.
DATE: 11-2-81
SUBJECT:
Partial Pay Estimate #5 - ~ooth Calloway Road Improvement Pro;ect
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
BACKGROUND:
Austin Road Compan~~eQuestin~ paymen~ for work performed in
the month of September.
Total Project Cost
$474,699.15
$270,627.30
'$ 27.062. 73
$2439564..57
$242.214.57
$ 1.350.00
Work Performed to Date
Less 10%
Difference
Less Previous Payments
Due This Estimate
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQITIRED:
Approval of estimate in the amount of $1,350.00
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES X
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: Bonds
~-------------------- ----------------~-~--------
.
.
.
KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, I NC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
October 23, 1981
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North,Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-318, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS,
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.5, dated
October 22, 1981, made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of
$1,350.00 for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of September 30, 1981.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site
by .your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and ad'ditions.
We recommend that this payment in amount of $1,350.00 be made to
Austin Road Co. at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113.-
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
P.S. Please send next Month's estimate first to Floyd McCallum
for this signature. He will then transmit estimate, to us
for further processing.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
· "
- - ... - - .... ..--
c 0 ~ T RAe TOR·' S
- - -
EST I Ì"~ ATE
.-. .... -- - - .. ~ -
P 1 OF 3
FILE F3318
TE NO.- 5 JOB NO.,- 3-318
'DESCRIPTION- BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE I,MPROVEMENTS
- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- 10/22/81
CHARGED THRU PERICD- 136 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY
OR ~ATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PER I CD ENDI~~G- 9/30/81
ORK, ORDER DATE- '~/18/al.,'" (,ALENDAR DAYS-',' 280 COMP,LETION DATE- 2/2,1/82
G.
ITEi'}, DESCRIPTION
"PREVIOUS THrs"
UNIT ESTI~ATE ESTIMATE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
~-~~-~--~-~---~--~~-~-~-~-~--~~~--~- ---~--~- --~-~--~ -------~ ~--~~--- -~-~----~
Atl:üUN T
1~ UNCL. STREET EXCAvATro~
2. SUBGRADE PREP.. NO AD~I,X
3. SUBGRADE STAB'. wITH lIME
SLURRY (6" THICK)
4. LIME FOR STABILIZED SUBGRADE
5 . SAW C lJ T S FOR R E~i 0 V A L OF
EXIST. CONC. AND~ASPH.
6. REMOVE EX I ST. CURB & GlJTTER
7. REMOVE ExrST.,5tt THK CONC.
DRIVEWAYS
8. CONSTRUCT 6" CURS & 18"
GUTTER, INCL. REINF. STL
9. 6"': THICK CCi~C. VALLEYS,
'INCL. REINF. STEEL
If '-30 O~ EA-HV~~1S' PR I~I:E COAT
\'1 I TH SAND
1. hC-2 OR EA-HVRS ASPH. TACK
COAT
2. T Y .. A, H ~~ A C, 4' t' T r-i I C K, C 0 ~..: p .
IN 2" EQUAL, COlJRSES
3. TY.D H~AC, CO~PACTED 2·' THK
4. TY.D H~AC FOR TRA~S. & ~ISC.
USES
5. ADJ. EXIST. SAN. SE~ER ~.H.
TO FINISHED STREET GRADE
6. A D ~J. : EXIST. 5 . S. C LEA NO U T S &.
WATER VALVE BOXES
7. 5" THICK CO~CRETE QRWYS.,
I~CL. REINF. STEEL
8.4" THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALKS
INCL. REINF. STEEL
9. REMOVE, SET RACK & RELOCATE
E X 1ST I;'} G F E ~'\! C I t'-1 G
o. RE~OVE EXIST. CULVERT STRue.
AT CALLO~AY gR. & C. RD.
:1. UNCL. CYAN~EL EXCAVATION
:2. CL.A(3000 PSI) FOR~ED CONe.
FOR CULV.&TRANS. STqUC.
'_~_~~. B ( <}O~ ~~) U;~F. CO:\JC.
I' '.. FOR C~=l¡NER ~i.qSC'·rUSES
L-f-. DIA. Y\t:E? HOLc.S, I,,-!,-L.
FILTE~ ~EDIA
i5. TRIPLE PIPE RAILING FOR
CUL\/ERT RAILI,'~G
C.Y.
S'. Y.
S.Y.
T 0 j"~
L.F'.
l.F.
S.F.
L.F.
S.F.,
s.v.
S.Y.
5 . Y .'
s. Y.
TOf\l
EACH
EACH
S.F.
S. F'.
L.F.
L.S.
e.Y.
(.Y.
(.Y.
EACH
L.F.
0.0,0
0.,00
0.00
0.08
0.,00
0.00
0.00
o.ca
0.00
o.co
a.ao
0.00,
0.00
a.co
0.00
ù.oo
0.00
0.00
1725.00
1.00
3400.00
290.00
110.00
12.00
0.00
0.,00
0.00
0.00
0·.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OJ
0.00
0.00
a.oo
0.00
0.0,0
:)400
0.00
0.00
o . \0) 0
0.0:)
c.oa
a.oo
c.oo
0.00
7.50
0.00
0.00
O.QG
C.OO
0.00
ü.OO
c.ca
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
,G.QO
0.00 ,
0.00 '
O.GO
O.GO
o .' (} 0
J .80,
0.00
1725.00
1.00
3400.IJJ
290.GO
117.50
12.00
c.ca
2.12
1.75
1.23
75.Üü
1.03
,2.05
1.08
4.91
3.21
a.25
0.11
5 .'70
2.93
3J.OJ
1 2 ~ .' ~ ü
1'20. GO
3.40
3.40
1.62
lü50.0~
4.00
247.ûO
2(;~.CO
5.40
17.7C
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0 . a 0
o.co
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
a.OJ
c.oa
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.CG
0.00
1''''\ ~ .')
V.\J'V
2794.50
l050.~~
136QO.00
7163J.OC
2358J.CQ
lOC·.3Q
o.cc
~¡ ..
CON T RAe TOR'S
- - - - ~ - - ~ - -
EST I r,,~ ATE
--...---
P 2 OF 3
FILE F3318
s r.TE' NO .-' 5 ' JOB f\~O.- 3-318
ROTDESCRIPTION- BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVE~ENTS
WNER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- 10/22/81
IME CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 136 DAYS CONT~ACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPA\Y
OR f-1ATERIALS FURr'lISHED AND lABOR PE~FORt"ED IN PERIOD Et'\Dlj'~G- 9/30/81
ORK:,ORDER DATE- 5/18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DATE- 2/21/82
o.
ITEM DESCRIPTIO.\J
PRE\JIOUS THI'S
UNIT ESTI~ATE ESTI~ATE
TOTAL
U~~ r T
PRICE
A,\:OUt\ T
-~-~-~-----~----~~-~-~~-~---~--~~--- -------- ~---~--- -~---~~~ ----~~-~ ----~--~-
6. ANCHOR PLATES FOR CULVERT
RAILIi\1G
7., POS:,TS:F'OR CUL VER T' 'RA I LING
8. REINF. STEEL FOR CULVERT &
T~ANSITION ST~UCïURES
9. ROCK RIPRAP C12-INCH)
o. BEDDING MATERIAL (4-INCH)
1. 18,·"DIA.(CL.III)RCP INCL.,
EXC..E~R. & BACKFILL
2. 21 t 'DIA. (CL. I I I )RCP INCL.
EXC.,E~8. & BACKFILL
3. 30"DIA.(CL.III)RCP INCL.
EXC.,EMB. & BACKFILL
4 . 3 3 ~:: t, D I. .~ .. ( C L,. I I I) R cpr Ì'~ C l .
EXC.,E~8. & BACKFILL
"DIA.(CL.III)RCP INCL.
EXC.tE¥8. & BACKFILL
(,. 3 9' tor A. ( C L . I I I ) R C P I ;\J C L .
EXC.,~~B. & BACKFILL
7.. 50'· ~X31t' FULLY LINED &
COATED CGM PIPE ARCH
R. 5' CURB INLET
9. 10' CUR9 INLET
o. 15' CURB It\LET
1. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA.
M+23
2. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA.
10+84
3. STORM QRAIN VAULT AT STA.
15+38
4. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STÞ.
21+63
5. gt'DIA.CC,L.50)DUCTILE ¡,RON
'.-.' ATE R L I N E
16. 6t'DIA.(CL.50)DUCTILE IRON
! WATER LINE
17. Due T I LEI RON FIT TIN G 5
8. 16' 'DIA. TAP. SADDLE & 8' t
TAPPI~G VALVE W/80X
9..-"Xg" TAD. SlE-ÈVE & 8"
TAPPING VALVE W/80X
o. 6"X6' f TAP. SLEEVE & 6"
TAP-Þ-rNG VA-L VE W / ROX
1. 16' 'DrA. TAP. SADDLE & 6"
TAPPING VALVE W/ROX
-._---
EACH
EACH
16.00
0.00
lB. 39332.000
C.Y. O.OJ
C.·Y. 55.00
L.F. 217.00
L.F. 159.00
L,.F. 300.00
L.F. 321.00
L.F. 450.QJ
L.F. 356.00
l.F. 214.00
EACH o.co
EACH a.Qa
EACH O.,JO
l.,S. 1.00
L.S. 1.00
L.S. 1.00
L.S. 1.00
0.00 16 .-00 26 '. 5 0 4~,4. 00
0.00 c.oo 164.QQ 'o.cc
O.:JOC39332.GCC 0.30 11799.60
c.Ge c (... (" 53.00 :·.ûO
.~u
c.oo 55.00 19 . CO 1045.00
0.00 217.00 21.00 4557.00
0.00 159.00 23.10 3672.90
0.00 300.0J 35 .,0 C 105,00.00
0.00 321.00 40.00 1 2840 . '0 0
Q.oe 450.00 47.80 2115û.jO
0.00 356.00 55.00 19580.00
0.00 2 14 .,00 63.00 13482.-:.10
0.00 c.oa lú5Ü.ÜÛ 0.00
0.00 c.ca 132ü.ca o.oe
0.00 0.00 20CQ.Oû oJ .00
0.00 1.00 ,3150.00 3150.00
0.00 1.0e 21uQ.GC 21UU.Ou
o.ao 1.00 2100.00 21GG.OO
0.00 1.00 1900.00 190c.oa
L.F. 264.
L.F. 236.00
LB. 2~52.00
EACH 2.00
EACH 3.00
E A C H 0---;-00
EACH 4.00
0.00 236.00
O.Oo2052.1.J1
14.00
0.00 2.00 1600.00 3200.00
o.ou 3.00 1200.00 3600.00
0.00 o .OO---¡1f5U .co û.oo
c.oa 4.00 1060 .~\JU 4240.0C
CON T RAe TOR .f S
ESTIrv1ATE
P 3 OF 3
FILE F3318
- - -
- - -
- - ~ ... - --
TI.E ~o.- 5 JOB NO.- 3-318
OJ 'D~SCRIPTrON- BOOTH CALLOWAY RO'AD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
'~'ER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NOR,TH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- 10/22/81
~E CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 136 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY
R MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 9/30/81
RK ,ORDER DATE- , 5/18/81, CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DATE- 2/~1/82
PREV ¡,QUS TH IS
UNIT ESTIMATE ESTI~ATE
TOTAL
UNIT
"PRICE
A~aU(\~ T
~-----~~---~~--~~-------~~-~------- ---~~~~- ------~- ~~------ -------- ------~--
.' \1: ATE R SERVICE TRA~~SFER EACH, 9.00 o .,CO 9.00 420.00 3780.00
.. \"A T'ER SERVICE LINE L.F. 285.00 0.00 285.00 6.50 1852.50
RELOCATE E X 1ST I "!G FIRE,
HYDRAN-T EACH 1.00 0.00 1.00 600.CC 600.00
· 8 t I DIA. EX. STRENGTH v.c.
5 A "I . 5 E'/v E R L I l'J E . L.F. 446.00 O.JÛ 446.00 16.0U 7136.00
· SAN. SE~~ER SERVe CONNECTION EACH 4.00 0.00 4.,00 16,Q . 00 640.00
· 4 - I :"'.J C H SA 1\1 . 5 Et~ E R SERVe l I ~~ E L.F. 170.00 0..00 170.00 6.50 1105.00
· 2' 'DIA.&3t 'DrA. ~J ATE R L I ;\1 E
TRAì\jSFER CO¡\1NECT ION S EACH 5.00 O.QO 5 .\ n 50(J.ü~ 25CG.ÜJ
.uv
· 4' DIA. SS!\1H (C.O. ¡"J 0 . 1 ) EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00 910.0J 182C.GC
8 ' I DIA. S.S,. (C.O. NO. 1 ) L.F. 240.00 0.00 2¿.O.80 1 9 ,. 8 5 4764.00
· TY.D HMAC PV~T REPL. (('.0. r ) S.y. 0.00 o.a~ 0.00 4.14 0.00
· 8X6 TAP.SLV.W/VALCC.O. r-'J o. 1 ) EACH 1.00 O.üO 1.00 1145.00 1145.00
~ . E \J CAS E~~1 E i'l T ( C .' 0 .' r~O. 3 ) L.F. 122.JO 0.00 122.CO 17.50 2135.00
~LD VERIFICATION OF JOB CONDITIONS
~D CO~FIR~ATION OF PAY QUANTITIES
, - __~_1f!~~Æ__~___-____
(OW~ER'S PROJECT REP~ESENTATIVE)
,19
~~--~--~---~----~~~-~~~--~~-~-~~~~~~~~~-~--~~_.~~~_._~~-~~-~~-~~---~~~--~~--~~-~~-~
t 1 9 --;g'7
ïOTAL .............
LESS 10 PERCENT RETAINED. . . .
DIFFERENCE. . . . . · · · ·
PLUS 75 PERCE;\¡T ;'iATLS O~,¡ HAND. .
TOTAL .............
LESS PREVIOUS PAY~ENTS . . · · .
9IFFEREKCE DUE THIS ~STI~ATt . .
,',j 0 T E - PAY LAS T A;': 0 U f\ T S H 0 \¡: N
270627.38
27062~73
2435ó4.57
C.OO
243564.57
242214.57
1350.00
PRû\JED-
~OWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERSt I~C.
CON~~LTI~G E~GINE~qS
r~ 'pIE
--~--~--~~~-~~-----'----~~--~--~~
,.-
ATF- 0 t,:C. ~~
I ~
I, -
----~--~--~----~~-~~---
OTAl EARNINGS (INCL. RETAIN.)-S 270627.30
¡ME CHARGED THRU THIS PE~IOD- 136 CAYS
TOTAL 919-$ 474699.15 PERC~NT- 57.01
TOT A L T l~.-! E - 2 8 0 DAY S PER C E ;,~ T - 4 d . 5 7
--.
! 7\ ':}-.
! .'
~ I.
, fA SG' IJJ StJ
CON T RAe TOR t S
y
- - -
- - -
EST
ATE
P 1 OF 3
FILE F3318
- - -
- - -
!ú /ì.ÞY1
STIMATE NO.- 5 JOB NO.- 3-318
-". .. -.
RO_,CT DESCR I PT ION- BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
WN NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE-IO-1-81
1M HARGED 'THRU PERIOD~ 138 'DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY
OR MATER I ALS FURN I SHED AND LABOR PERFORM-Eb-rf'lp-e:r{[Õ-o-END1NG- ~~Ì'~l
ORK ORDER DATE- 5/18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DAT~- 2/21/82
o.
1'TEM DES·CRI PT ION
PREVIOUS THIS
UNIT ESTIMATE ESTlt~ATE
TOTAL
UNIT
PR ICE,
AMOUNT
------------------------------------ ----~--- -------- -------- -------- ---------
1. UNCL. STREET EXCAVATION C.Y~
2. SUBGRADE PREP., NO ADMIX s.v.
3. SUBG·RADE STAB. WITH L,IME"
SLURRY (61. THICK) S.Y~
4. LIME' FOR STABILrZED SUBGRADE TON
5. SAW CUTS FOR REMOVAL OF
EXIST. CONCa AND ASPH. L.F.
6. REMOVE EXIST. CURB & GUTTER L.F.
7. REMOVE EXIST. 5· t tHK CONC.
DRIVEWAYS S.F.
8. CONSTRUCT 6,t, CURB & 18tt
GutTER. INCL. REINF. STL L.F.
9. 6tt THICK CONC. VALLEYS,
INCL. REINF. STEEL S.F.
o. MC-30 OR EA-HVMS PR I ME-CÖA T
WITH SAND S.Y.
~R EA-HVRSASPH.TACK
COAT s.v.
2. TY.A HMAC, 4ft THICK, COMP.
IN 2, EQUAL COURSES S.Y.
-~TV. D HMAë. COMPAClt:D 2' I THK s. Y.
4. TY.D HMAC FOR"TRANS. & MISC.
,USES TON
5. ADJ. EXIST. SAN. SEWER M.H.
TO FINISHED STREET GRADE EACH
6. ADJ. EXIST. 5.5. CLEANOUTS &
WATER VALVE BOXES EACH
7. 5tt THICK CONCRETE DRWYS.t
INCL. REINF. STEEL S.F.
-a--;-Z;-·-t-r-HI'C K CON C-R-Ë.-rS-fCfE-wACR-S
INCL. REINF. STEEL S.F.
9. REMOVE, SET BACK & RELOCATE
----E>CtsT-ÿNG-FENC-ING L.F.
~o. REMOVE EXIST. CULVERT STRUC.
AT CALLOWAY SR. & c. RD. L.~.
l~UNCL.-CHANNEL EXCAVATioN C.V.
2. CL.A(3000 PSI) FORMED CONCa
I FOR CULV.&TRANS. STRUC. C.Y.
!~'-3-;--C-L .S(-2 O-oOPSI-fUNF-;-(O N C .
FOR CH.lINER &MISC. USES C.V.
?~!~~i~E~E~{D7~LES' INCL. EÃCH
2~~IPLE PIPE RAILING FOR
CULVERT RAILING L.F.
0.00
0.00
2.12
1.75
0.00
0.00
1.23
75.00
0.00
0.00
1.03
2.'05
0.00
1.08
0.00
4.91
0.00
3.21
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.11
0.00
o . 0-0
5.70
2.93
0.00
30.00
0.0'0
120.00
0.00
120 .00
0.00
3.40
0.00
3.40
1 7-2--5-;0-0
1 . 02~;Z9"~ ~5o-
172-5
1.00
340Ö-;-0-0
1
34-0·0
1050.00 1,050.00
4 .O-O----n-;-600:-ao--
290.00
290
247.00 71,630.00
110.00
7.5
117.5
200.00 23,500.00
12.00
--r2
8 . 4 0 roO-:-8
0.00
17.70
(f- ';
i·,
.' . ¡
- - -
CON T RAe TOR t S
. .
- - -
EST I MAT E
------
P 2 OF 3
FILE F3318
(
STIMATE NO.- 5 JOB NO.- 3-318
ROJEtr DESCRIPTION~ BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
W.' NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE-- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- 10-1-81
I HA,RGED THRU PER rOD- 13{bA YS CONTRACTOR-' AUST I N ROAD COMPANY
OR MATER I ALS FURN I SHED AND LABOR PERFORMED I N, PER 100 END I NG- 9-~81
ORK ORDER DATE- 5/18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMPLETION DATE- 2/21/82
ITEM DESCRIPTION
PÆEVTOUS ,', THIS'
UNIT, ESTIMATE EST'IMATE
TOTAL,
UN If,
PR ICE 'AMOUNT'
-------------~--------------------'-- -------- -------- --------' -------- ---------
ANCHOR PLATES FOR CULVERT
RAILING
POSTS FOR CULVERIRA IL ING
REINF. STEEL FOR CULVERT &
TRANSITIO~ STRUCTURES,
ROCK RIPRAP (12-INCH)
BEDDING MATERIAL, (4-INCH)
lS"DIA.(CL.III)RCP INCL.
EXC., .EMB. &, BAëKFILL
21f'DIA.(CL.III)RCP INCL.
EXC..EMB. & BACKFILL
3 O' · D-'¡-A;TCC;-ITITR-CP-tI'K L .
EXC..EMB. & BACKFILL
33ttDIA.(CL.III)RCP INCL.
ËXC.tEMB. & BACKFILL
35. 36ttDIA.tCL.tII)RCP INCL.
~XC'. .EMS. & BACKFILL
,16.~-rrDIA.(CL.III)RCP INCL.
EXC.,EMB. & BACKFILL
50' 'X31tt FULLY LINED &,
è-Ö-ATe:-ö CG11P-Z-P-E-AR-C H
5· CURB INLET
10', CURB INLET
15 I CURBINLET
STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA.
M+23
-Z-;-S-rOR-M-DRÄ1N VAULT' AT STA.
10+84
STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA.
1-5 +38
STORM DRAIN VAULT AT STA.
21+63
'--5-;-8 -t-d .--t5-rA -;-f"Cl:-;-S-OTDVCr-ra-I-R'O N
WATER LINE
6'tDIA.CCL.50)DUCTILE IRON
tifA'T-E-R-LINE
DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS
16ttDIA. TAP. SADDLE & 8t.
TA- P P-I-NG--V A-CVt"W7S-crx
s"xa' f TAP. SLEEVE & 8'.
'~ TAPPING VALVE W/BOX
.0).'-' X~-~-;p ~ ~~.. V ¡E~·~V~;o~-rr
-1. 16' 'DIA. TAP. SADDLE & 6"
TAP P-I-~G----vACV-rw7-B-O-X
~.._---_.__......_--~-
EACH 16.00
EACH 0.00
16
26.50 424.00
164.00 . Il 11'.1,'0
J
o:~~
19.00 1,045.00
LB. 39332.000
C.V. O. 0
C.V. 55.00
,L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L'.F.
L.F.
L.F."
EACH
EACH
EAC-H
L.S.
L.S.
L.S.
L.S.
L.F.
I..F.
LB.
EÄCH
EACH
EACH
EACH
55
2-17.00
11-7
159.00
, 159
300.00
300
321,
321.,00
450.00
450
356.00
356
2~O
0.00
0.00
(f;ö 0
2T4
1.00
1.00
1.0-0
1.00
264.00
264
2-3-0;0-0
2052.00
236
2052
2.0-0
3.00
0.00
4.00
1
2--r;uu 4 , 557:lJcr-
'23.10 3,672.90
35.00 10,500.00
40.00 l2 ,~4U .'uu
47.00 21,150.00
55.00 19,580.00
63.00 .13 , 482:"GU--
1050.00
1320.00
2 crcrn--.-cro
3150.00 3,150.00
J
2100.00 '2,100.00
2100.00 ¿,.LOO-:-OU-
1900.00 1,900.00
18.00 4,752.00
14 . 0-0 3, 3-04:Ua-
1.50 3,078.00
15crey¡-O-·O :.1 , ZGO-:cro-
1200.00 3,600.00
1050.00
rcr5o-ëOO'-Jf;74a:-Oo-
1
1
1
2
3
4
t'.7 ./
.....~. I
CON T RAe TOR t 5
- - - - - - - - - - - -
EST I t' ATE
P 3 OF 3
FILE F3318
- - - - - - - -
'ST,IMATE ~JO.- 5 JOB NO.- 3-318
:ROJECT DESCRIPTION- BOOTH ,CALLOWAY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
'WNER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE,,- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE- ra=J==g-~
IM.HARGED THRU PERIOD- 138 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY
OR TERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 9-31-81
ORK ORDER DATE- 5/18/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 280 COMÞ~Ëll~~-'~2/21TS¿
9--.-0-0
285.00
THIS UNIT
EST'lMAíE TOTAL PRTCC--AMOUNr-
---- -.... _. --.-. ...-....------ ~-.......--...-.-- ....--.-.-........,-...
9 4lU.UO 3,~
285 6.50 1,852.50
_1 600.00 6t}O.OO
446 16.00 ,7,136.00
4 '160.00 640.00
170 6.50 1,,105.00
5 500.00 21500-:-00--
2 910.00 1,820.00
240, 19.85 4,764.00
4.14
1 1145.00 1,145.00
122 17.50 2,135.00
o.
If-EM DESCRIPTION,
PREVIOUS
UNIT ESTIMATE
---------------------~-------------- --------
2. WATER SERVICE TRANsrER
3. WATER SERVICE LINE
4. RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT
5. 8tt DIA. EX. STRENGTH v.c.
SAN. SEWER LINE
6. SAN~ SEWER SERVe CONNECTION
7. 4-INCH SAN. SEWER SERVe LINE
a. 2t'DIA.&3·tDIA. WATER LINE
TRANSFER CONNECTIONS
9. 4' DIA. SSMH (C.O. NO.1)
0.8" DIA. 5.S. (C.O. NO., 1)
1. TY.D HMAC PVMT REPL.(C.O. 1)
2. 8X6 TAP.SLV.W/VALCC.Q. NO.1)
3. CONC. ENCASEMENT (C.O. NO.3)
EACH'
, L.F.
EACH
L.F.
E'ACH
EACH
L.F.
S.Y.
EACH
L.F.
-e
IELD VERIFICATION OF JOB CONDITIONS
ND CONFIRMATION OF PAY QUANTITIES
y----~~-~~~~~-------
(OWNER-tS PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE)
ATE-___~~~_____________t19~_
1.00
,446.00,
4.00
170.00
5.00
2.00
240.00
0.00
1.00
122.00
-~~-~--~~----~-~-----~~-~~--~~--~--~-~~-~~~~~-~--~~--~---~-~--~~~~~~--~,~~~-~~~~-~-
TOTAL .............
LE-s-S-rrp--ËR-C-E-ÑTrfETAl-NE"D .'. . .
DIFFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . .
PLUS 75 PERCENT MATlS ON HAND. .
TblA L .............
------------------~------------- LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS . . . . .
) ATE - ______ t 1 9 D IFF ERE NeE DUE T HIS EST I MAT E . .
----------------------- N~-TE-PAYILASI~~OU~T--SHOwN
OTAL EARNINGS (INCL. RETAIN. )-$ 270,624.30 TOTAL BID-S 474699.15 PERCENT- 57%
_i~1E, Cti!'RG~~_HRU THIS PERIOD- 138 DAYS TOTAL TI~1E- 290 DAYS PERCENT- 4_9~
.
PPROVED-
NOWt. T-ÖN-~EN-GLISH-FLOWER_s;_r-NC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
y-
---.-----.
..-'. --- .---.-----
2~Q,_fi2~t.-3-0-
27,052.43
243,561.87
2-4-3-;56]::1)]-
242214.57
1/_3_~t2.._3-º--
.
.
(
\.
.
/~
DATE: November 4~ '1981
SUBJECT:
Resolution
DEPARTMENT:
Administration
BACKGROUND:
Mr. Herbert Leach was nominated as Director to the Tarrant
County Tax Appraisal District at last Council meeting. Council needs to
cast their vote by approving resoluti.on.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQtTlRED:
Approve Resolution
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
----------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------
.
RESOLUTION NO.
Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills; Texas, that:
T~e City of North Richland Hills does hereby cast its vote for
Herb Leach as the Director for the Tarrant County Appraisal District.
Passed and approved this 9th day of November, 1981.
Dick Faram, Mayor
. ATTEST:
.
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City' Attorney
.
TARRANT COUNTY
FORT WORTH, 'fEXAS 76102
. RQBERT M. PARTEN
CHIlE" DEPUTY
MADRIN HUFFMAN
COUNTY CLERK
October 19, 1981
Honorable Mayor Dick Faram
P. O. Box 18609
North Ric~land Hills, TX 76118
To the Governing Body of
City of North Richland Hills
Enclosed you will find the nominees made by the taxing
4IÞ entities of the Tarrant County Tax Appraisal District.
Please return your votes on the enclosed numbered Ballot
4IÞ
to the County Clerks Office before November 15, 1981.
Sincerely yours,
Madrin Huffman
County Clerk
~~~
Robert Parten
Chief Deputy
. ,
e
.
_.
NUMBER 46
BALLOT
FOR
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD
OF THE
TAX APPRAISAL
DISTRICT
IN
TARRANT COUNTY
WE, THE GOVERNING BODY OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
. .
HAVING BEEN ADVISED BY THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY THAT
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
IS ENTIT~ED TO CAST ,60
. ,
VOTES COLLECT~VELY OR S~PARATELY ON JHE FOLLOWING NOMINEES ,FOR THE
BOARD OF THE TAX APPRAISAL DISTRICT IN TARRANT COUNTY:
. ,
NOi4INEES
WILLIAM M.(BILL) BROWN
T .H. BRYERS ,
T.J. ELKINS
EUGENE HIGHTO~~ER
HERBERT LEACH
PATSY RUTHERFORD
MARY SACCO
REX SCOTT
HOMER TO~~LINSON
HERr~AN VESELKA
-
DO HEREBY RESOLVE AND ORDER THAT
CAST, AND DOES HEREBY CAST, ITS VOTES AS FOLLOWS:
VOTES FOR
VOTES FOR
VOTES FOR
VOTES FOR
VOTES FOR
PASSED THIS
ATTEST:
SECRETARY OR CLERK FOR:
FOR
,1981.
PRESIDING OFFICER
. " .........!- ,,--.~.,'~'-~' --.----.-..... -,'.. ..~-
''''.-',.Jt'';.'''aO., _<t'...,....JI;'.'......o<\....__...,......~...., ·............"......·''''fr''-,~~~~-~-----..,.~~...~..~,~..i'':'"''J'It'~~'~':~~~!:~t_~.
.~
DATE:
11-2-81
SUBJECT: Change to "Rules, Re~ulation$, Pol;(';p~" ~nr1 PTo~~d11r,e» ,for t-ry~
e North Richland Hills Water and Sewer System"
DEPARTMENT: Utility
e
e
BACKGROUND: With the incr~asing water rates it is nec~9sary to ra1~p tne
water/sewer deposit from $25.00 to' $35.00.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQlTIRED:
Approval of deposit change
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES N/A NO
N/A
....- - ~--~- ...--- -- ......-,........'...--~....._....- -------.... -....... --.... --- -...-.........,...... -....-...-.--- - --... -.......,-... ---... ---~... ---...............-...... - -... - -.-'- -- -....-----. ...... - .*,--
I' rJ .,
e
.
-
ORDINANCE NO. ~
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas) that Ordinanée'No. 381, "Rules, Regulations,
Policies and Procedures for the City of North Richland Hills Water
and Sewer System" adopted November 8, 1971, be and the same is
hereby AMENDED by changing Paragraph Ala of Section 'IV to read
as follows:
Ala. For residential customers who have not previously
been eligible fo~ discontinuance under preceeding
Section'!I! D, the deposit shall be ,$35.00 plus
non-refundable service charge of $5.00.
'The policy, procedure and specified change shall take'
effect on November 9, 1981.
the
Passed and approved in regular Council meeting on this
day of' ,1981.
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
'~
\
.
)e
·e
í\
J:tr
City of J(6rth Richland Hills, Texas
TO:
DATE: October 5~ 1981
FROM:
Chuck Williams
City Manager
Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
P & Z Cases to be heard by City Council October 12, 1871
SUBJECT:
PS 81-49
APPROVED
AMENDMENT TO
ZONING ORDINANCE
Request of A. T. Adcock for final plat
of Briarwood Estates 'Addition~ 4th Filing.
Parking regulations for duplexes.
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
,
.
.
.
DATE: October 8, 1981"
SUBJECT:
Appointment to Parks and "RecreatiOn Commission
CITY COUNCIL ~CTION lŒQUlRED:
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
lected at' the Pre _~ouncil meeting
agreed to serve.
ADproveappoiotmpn~
NO
-------------------------------------------------------------------
~"
--··;·-f !).
.---; / :.¿ . ..:.~c \. :.,:;
COMMISSIOl'~ ME}ffi
~ame
BILL BURK
Address 6504 Springriver
Employer Carson~Luebbehusen & Burk, Inc.
Phone: Home 498-6215
Office
336-3382
Wife's Name Susan
Children's Name 'and· Ages Brad
7, Steven
4
Resident 'of the, Çity since 1979
Previous Residence 33,12 Lemon, Tree , PIano, Texas
Occupation1ndependent Insurance Agent'
,
.~
Do you own real prope~ty in tlo~th Richland H"ì1s? Yes"X ._. 'rlo'
4IÞelubershìPs~ Org~izations and P~evious Èxperi~nce on City C~~ission:'
Petroleum Club - Fort '~orth, Diamond Oaks, Professional Insurance Agents
Association, IndependeI.!.!- Insur'ance Ag.ents of Texas & Ta:~ant County,
"
,
North Richland Hills 'Baptist Churcl1 - No· previous·, experience on City _'__...___..~~__
Commis~ion
':,-"-
Co~~ent (About yourself, why you wish to serve, qualifications and Oel~r
. ,
pertin~nt information~)
As a resident of North Richland" Hills, I' feel it is my duty to offer my .
assistance 'to the Ci t·y.·
....~~
e--
.--...........--.... ............. . .......- --.
.....~. .
--....--.~~-
e
e
e
DATE: October 7, 1981 '7
SUBJECT: PS 81-49 Final Plat of Briarwood Estates Addition, 4th Filing
DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning
BACKGROUND: Mr. Adcock has compli~~ith all the Cit~,Engineer's comments except
for the pro rata. He plans to provide us with a covenant shortly.
This property lies between starnes .Road,an9 Briarwood Estates Addition with the
extension of Post Oak Drive.
The Planning and Zoning Conmtssion recommended approval of this-plat subject to the
Engineerls comments and subject to includ'ing manholes on 500 foot intervals.
CITY COUNCIL ~CTIONJŒQUIRED:
Approval 6ffinal plat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
NO X
YES
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
. ..
----------------------~----~----------------------------~~--~~~
e
e
e
I
~
Ms. Calvert
Planning and Zoning Department
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Briarwood Estates, Final Plat
Dear Ms. Calvert:
(
October 7, 1981
We have reviewed the requirements filed by the City staff
and the Planning and Zoning Commission and have no problem in
complying with their request. We will be forwarding a letter
covenant in lieu of the estimated future participa~ion cost as
required by comment No.7 of the engineer's review letter.
~. We wish to thank the staff for its help, and look forward
to working with them on future projects.
C2 ~(Í~j¿
A. T. A cac '
Owner
~~~J
u ngel .
Ce
(
(
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 N.E. LOOP
820, SEPTEMBER 24, 1981-7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order
at 7: 40 P. M .
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS
COUNCILMAN
DIRECTOR OF D LOPMENT
P & Z COOR . ATOR
Cà: Greenfield
on Bowen
George Tucker
Mark Hannon
Jim 'Ramsey
Allen Bronstad
Wanda Calvert
'Marjorie Nash
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF AUGUST 27, 1981
r. Hannon moved, seconded by Mr. Bowen,
to approve the mìnutes as written.
'NEW BUS INESS \,
1.
(e
2.
re
\
The motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Tucker
abstaining due to absence from the meeting.
Request of Mrs. Sid Parker to rezone Lot
1R, Block 3, Richaven Addition, from its
present classification of IF-9 to
Neighborhood Retail.
Thi's' property is' located at 4801 Grove St.
This case was withdrawn prior to meeting.
PS 81-49
Request of A. T.,Adcock for final plat of
Brtarwood Estates Additi,on~ 4th Fi1ing.
. '
Mr. Jack Angel~ Engi"neer, came forward to
repres'ent 'the developer of Sri aY1'lood
E~tates, 4th Filing. '
Mr. Angel said that on the plat there was a
slight error in the metes and bounds which
hè would correct prior ,to going to council.
M,r. Angel sa;'d they hàd received the letter
from the City Engineer and on item #2
regarding signtng a covenant agreeing to ,
participate tn future pavi.ng and drainage
Page 2 (
P & Z Minutes ·
September 24~ 1981
(
improvements on Starnes Road~ they would
rather not be tied down with a covenant. e
He said he and his client would get with
the City Staff and work out something.
Mr. Angel stated they had no problems in
meeting the other requirements.
The Chairman asked Mr. Bronstad about the
covenant.
Mr. Bronstad sai"d the City has a policy
which requires the developer either sign
a covenant or put up X-number of dollars
to cover future street and drainage
i"mprovements. He said he would get with
the ctty Engtneer and see what kind of
pri"ce tag the developer would have to pay.
Mr. Hannon said that in regards to the
sewer, there are not enough manholes.
3.
PS 81-50
Mr. Angelsatd there should have been a
manh61e shown on the plat. He said this
would be corrected.
The Chainnan opened the Public Hearing and e
called for anyone wishing to speak in fàvor~
of or in opposition to this request to
please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, the
Chai,rman closed the Public H~ar;ng.
Mr. Hannon moved to approve PS 81-49 subject
to the Engtneer"s comments and subject to
including manholes on 500 ft. intervals.
Mr. Tucker seconded the" motion and the moti on
carrted 4-0. . .. .
Request of Dyna-Co for preliminary
Block 6, Snow Hei'ghts, North -, lone
/
,
\.
PS 81-49
APPROVED
Mr. Delbert St , ge, Consulting Engineer"
to represent Dyna-Co. '
Mr. Stembridge sa;'d they had recei ved the
City Engineer~s letter and they take
excepti.on to i~tèm, #1 regardi'ng a prel iminary
layout of the adjoining property which is·
also owned by this development. He said '
(,
/
í
.,
e
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort \Vorth-[)(1llas
September 30, 1981
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-847, CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS,
BRIARWOOD ESTATES, FINAL PLANS, PS 81-49
We would refer you, to comment no. 7 of our review letter for the referenced
materials dated Septe,nber 16,1981, concerning pro rata on future improvements
of Starnes Road. We, understand that the Developer is considering escrowing
such pro rata at this time rather than signing a letter covenant for par-
ticipation in future reconstruction of Starnes Road'.
The current per front foot cost of Developer participation based on one
half of a future 44-foot collector would be computed as follows:
Excavation 0.88 C.Y./L.F. ($2.00/C.Y.) = $ 1.76
Stab. Su bgrade 2.56 S.Y./L.F. ($1.00/S.Y.) = 2.56
Lime 0.06 Ton/L.F. ($80.00/Ton) = 4.80
e Curb and Gutter 1 L.F. ($5.50/L.F.) = 5.50
Prime' 2.22 S.Y./L.F. ($O.35/S.Y.) = 0.78
Tack' 4.45 S.Y./L.F. ($O.10/S.Y.) = 0.45
411 Type nA" HMAC 2.22 S.Y./L.F. ($5.40/S.Y.) = 11.99
2" Type "DII HMAC 2.22 S.Y./L.F. ($3.00/S.Y.) = 6.66
SUB-TOTAL = $34.50
Plus: Stann Drainage 10.35
SUB-TOTAL = $44.85
Pl us: Design, Layout, Inspection & Testing 4.49
TOTAL = -$49 . 34
Assessment (Residential) based on 70% curb and gutter costs and 60%
paving and stann drainage:
Assessment = 0.70 x $5.50 + 0.60 x $43.84 = $30.15
The total current Developer cost would be 415.9 feet x $30. 15/foot = $12,541.05
Please call if you have any questions concerning this procedure.
o
~
ALBIN, P.E.
e
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
~ ..
(
('
'...
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC
e
CONSULTING ENC IN EERS / Fort \Vorth-Dallas
September 16, 1981
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-847, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
BRIARWOOO ESTATES, BLOCKS 9, 10
AND 12, REVISED FINAL PLANS,
PS 81-49
e
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. The size of the proposed storm drain inlets in Pine Oak
Drive should be shown on the Paving Plans, Sheet 1 of 3.
Also, the proposed storm drain and inlet leads should be
shown in the plan view as well. The proposed 24-inch storm
drain profile should show the line extended fully to the
west property line. We understand that the line will be
"daylighted" onto the adjacent property.. The Developer's
Engineer has indicated that the adjacent property owner
has no objection to this and will furnish the City a letter
of agreement to this effect. We would recommend that a
temporary headwall structure or rock rubble riprap be placed
at the end of this storm drain to provide some measure of
erosion protection frŒn the storm water discharge.
2. The Developer should be 'required to sign a covenant agree-
ing to participate in future paving and drainage improve-
ments on Starnes Road for a total distance of 415.9 feet.
3. Fire hydrant protection appears to be inadequate for this
development. The location of all existing and proposed
hydrants should be shown on the 100 scale layout along with
500 foot radius circles of coverage plotted.
4. A stub-out northward from the proposed sanitary sewer man-
hole in Post Oak Drive on Line IIA" at Station 8+68 should
be provided for future service across Starnes Road.
e
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
(
c
Page 2 -- September 16, 1981 -- Planning & Zoning Commission
.
5. The street names should be labeled on the water and
sewer layout. Also the lots should be numbered.
.
6. Single water service connections appear to be provided
for each lot in this subdivision. The Developer's Engineer
should discuss with the Public Works Director the possibility
of using double service meters instead of single meters where
appropriate.
7. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share
of the existing 16-;nch line in Starnes Road which will serve
this development. We would suggest a pro rata of $5.5 per
linear foot for a total distance of 415.9 feet for an
equivalent a-inch line.
8. The Subdivision Ordinance requires that all sanitary sewer
lines be designated to handle the full drainage area tributary,
to the line, based on an equivalent population of 9.5
people per acre at 100 gallons per person per day adjusted
for peak flow along with an infiltration al,lowance of 1500
gallons (per) day. Based on these criteria we have
determined that the portion of the proposed 6-inch off-site
sanitary sewer which has less than 0.88% grade should be up-
sized to an 8-inch line.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
pleas do not hestiate to call.
RWA :mh
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
.
e
e
e
(
\
(
July 21, 1981
Mr. Tad Adcock
Alvarado, TX 76031
RE: Drainage of the proposed Briarwood Estates #4
Dear Sir:
I have reviewed the proposed development of the above
subdivision which lies adjacent to and just East of my
property, and have no problem with accepting the drainage.
I would request that the existing drainage which
presently comes under Starnes Road just to the East of my
property be somehow diverted' in order that it would enter
my existing lake. Your help in this matter would be
appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
~~J
DATE: October 6~ 1981
('~
_ SUBJECT: Amendment to Zonin~ Ordinance reQardinq parking spaces for duplexes.
DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning
BACKGROUND: There was some concern as to the necessi.tv of four (4) parking
spaces per living area in duplex zoninQ.
The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimou~ly to approve the amendment
to the Zoning Ordinance #179.
e
CITY COUNCIL ACTION' ItEQITIRED:
Approval of Amendment.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
-----------------------------------------------------------~~~--~~-{::~--------
e
(.e
(e
e
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
September 24, 1981
PS'81-50
APPROV
4.
AMENDMENT TO THE
ZONING ORDINANCE
they felt it was too premature to guess
what they plan to do with th~t property.
Mr. Stembridge said they had some prosR ts
but nothing concrete. He said they a
provided water and sewer to this a~ a~
but it is hard to tell what will e there.
Mr. Stembridge stated they ree to all
the City Engineer's comme s _except item
#1.
Mr. Bronstad reque ed that instead of
tying onto Rufe now they would tie onto
the back sinc hey also own that property.
Mr. Stemb dge said that was what they
plan to o.
Th Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
lled for anyone wishi'ng to speak in ·favor
of or in opposition to this request to
please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, the
Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Tucker moved to approve PS 81-50, subject
to the Engineer~s comments and the deletion
of item #1. '
Mr. Bowen seconded the motion and the motion
carried 4-0.
The Chairman recognized two young ladies in
the audience from Rich1and High School who
were in an Advanced Social Science class in
whi,ch one of the Conmissi on members ~ Marjori e
Nash~ spoke last week.
Parking regulations.
The Chai.rman read the amendment.
Mr. Hannon said this amendment did not only
cover duplexes~ it also covers upublic
assembly" .
Mr. Tucker read from'·the Zoning Ordinance
stating you can have ~ublic assembly in
duplex zoni'ng.
e
e
-
ORDINANCE NO. ,It
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that Ordinance 179, "Zoning Ordinance" for the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, is hereby amended by changing Article XVII,
Section 3, Item 7, to read as follows:
117. Parking Regulations
Off-street space shall be provided on the lot to
accommodate two (2) cars for each living unit; however,
no supporting member of any garage, carport or other
automobile storage struct s.ha,l! be,_l.~~ª.t_r:_d wi.~l!jß-,-~--~
the r · front yar Pl aces oT'pÜbl i c assefu61y shall _ _l
~rovide off-stree parking at the ratio of one and one-halfli
1(1~) spaces for each five (5) seàts." ,/,_..J
10,.....----'-,------..- - -·'N.'.h____._ ___,..'_..__-.._,'. .__,..__..-___,~--_.-----;--/--
The speci fi ed change sha 11 take effect on /, /-r;;¡;-S/ ',' 1981.
Passed and approved in regular Council meeting on this the
day of , 1981.
Mayor -Dick Faram
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
.
.
.
"ì
.. 1
DATE: October 7, 1981
SUBJECT:
New Fees for replats in ~ingle Family and Duplex Zoning Districts.
DEPARTMENT:
Planning & Zoning
Since new legislatur~ was p~ssed regardi~g replats in Sin9le Family
BACKGROUND:
a'nd Duplex zoning districts, there are added costs involved. Therefore, we need
to increase the charge for replatting. in these, two areas. Here are som~ of the
added charges: ApproximatelY,10,hours of work instead of 2 hours work.
Postage for 100 letters-$I8.DO plus ehvelopes and paper.
Notice of Public Hearing-$25.00
Engirieering review-$50.00 .
There could be more added· expense if 20% of the property o~riers
coritest this, then we have to get w~itten confirmation from 2/3
of the remäi"ning property owners in order to approve the replat.
. .
Thi s waul d mean we wi"ll ~ave to have, forms for them to fi 11 out~ etc.
"The regular fee' for replats i's $75.00 ,plus' $1.50 per lot, and $15.00 recordinq fee.
The propo~ed fee is: $75.00 plus $1.50 per, lot, $15.00 ,recording .fee, plus
I~-P===::~\ '
( $ ,1.00 for each property owner to be notified.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION IŒQUIRED:
Approval of ordinance for additional fees for replats.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
~~-~~~~'~-~~~---~~~-~---~-~~-~~~-~--~-~~-~~~~--~~~-~--~~~~--~~---~-~~~~-~-~---~~~
.
.
.
. . ~
ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Texas have imposed added
requirements in the replat of Single Family and Duplex Districts; and
WHEREAS, such requirements have 'increased the costs of such
replats to the city;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1.
The following fee for application to replat Single Family and
Dùplex Districts shall be charged:
A. $75.00 plus $1.50 per lot.
B. $15.00 recording fee
C. $ 1.00 for each property owner to be notified.
2.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from the date
of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS'
DAY OF
,1981.
, Mayor Dick Faram
ATTEST:
. . . . . . . . .
City Secretary - Jeanette Moore
e
e
e
DATE: nrtnppr, H), 1 QR1 '
;
; J
SUBJECT:
Prnpn~prl ,Fr~nrh;~~ Amøonmpnt
DEPARTMENT:
City Attorney
Mr. Rex McEntire will present this item.
BACKGROUND:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION'IŒQUlRED:
BUDGETED ITEM:
NO
YES
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
--~--~~-~~--~-~--~~~-~-~~~--~~-~~--~~~~~-~~~~~~~-~~~------~~~~--~-~
, ..
Çe
re
ce
c. L METTLER
Consumer Produds Manager
Lone Star Gas Company
FORT WORTH DIVISION OF DISTRIBUTION
908-1 2 Monroe Street · Fort Worth, Texòs 76102
April 14, 1981
The Honoraþle Mayor and City Council
City of NQrth Richland Hills, Texas
Gentlemen:
In response to State and Federal regulation of natural gas pipeline
safety, Lone Star Gas Company has re-evaluated its practice relating to
installation and maintenance of service lines. In order to fully meet the
Company's responsibility for gas service from its main line to the point
of delivery for each customer, it is necessary to define the terms "service
line" and "yard line" in our existing franchise 'agreement with the City of
North Richland Hills.
The proposed franchise amendment will allow Lone Star Gas Company to
contract with our customers for installation and maintenance of "service
lines" which are defined as all of the gas piping from the connection with
the Company's main up to the meter where gas consumption is measured.
Each customer will be responsible for installation and maintenance of
his yard, line. A It yard line" is defined as an, underground supply line ex-
tending from the point of connection with a customer'·s meter to the point
of. connection ~ith that customer's house piping.
In addition to allowing Lone Star Gas Company to comply with regulatory
law, this new policy will offer the advantages of:
1. Quick response with repair of leaks after they are detected
on a service line;
2. Mïnimum periods of disrupted service for customers while
service lines are being repaired;
3. Allowing efficient use of labor and materials to effect repairs
or to provide new installations; and,
(e
(e
(e
6"
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
April 14, 1981
Page Two
4. Increased safety for customers by assuring service line in-
stallation accor,ding to. local, State and Federal·standard~.
Although this new service line policy will place additional responsi~
bility upon Lone Star Gas Company, we believe, the overall efficiency and
improved safety of operation provide ample justification for compliance with
regulato~y requirements.
Lone Œ~{;1!~~
C. L. Mettler
(e
e
ce
.-
SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION
AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE
INFORMATION SUMMARY
1. Lone Star Gas practice is to install and maintain service lines up to'
the point of gas measurement at no charge'to the customer. Installa-
tion expense will be capitalized. In cases where a city prefers the
Company to charge for such work, it can be done.
2. A brief ,form to be used for acqu1r1ng customer authorization to work
on the. portion of a service line located on private property will be
provided 'to distribution personnel. This will represent-the contract
between Lone Star Gas Company and the customer which is referred to '
in the franchise amendment.
3. A city cannot authorize Lone Star Gas to work on private property, how-
ever, Lone Star Gas must be specifically authorized to contract with
customers for installation and maintenance of service lines on their
property before such work can be placed int~ the distribution system
rate base.
4. Lone Star Gas Company has legal liability eor safe delivery of gas up
to the point of delivery to each customer. Because delivery can be
interpreted ,to take place 'at the point of measurèment, Lone Star Gas
often is responsible for operation of service lines on private property
which were not under Company control prior to implemeµtation of the new
service line 'procedure.
5.· The franchise amendment being pro~osed does not grant Lone Star Gas
the exclusive right to install and maintain service lines. Private
installations would still have to meet Company standards. If Lone Star
Gas is allowed by the city to provide the service without charge, it is
unlikely that a customer would seek private installation.
~~~'" .
.. ..
~e
d
......
.a.J
en
......
~
~
~
OJ
"'d
§
(1)
d
~
H OJ
CJ
OJ d
CJ C'CS
-1"'4 d
> ......
~ .-0
(. ,...
Q,
Ptj Q)
~ CI)
C'CS -M
.c:
(1) CJ
d d
-r1 C'CS
..:¡ ~
~
"'d
,...
ctS
>e
4-4
0
d
0
-r-4
.µ
-r-4
d
......
4-4
OJ
~
OJ
CJ
~
OJ
~~
-1"'4
CI)
OJ
~
QJ
d
erf
~
~
~
ctS
>t
QJ
s::
-r-4
~
QJ
CJ
eM
>
~
OJ
CI)
~.
;r ";,j
"
E-4
~
rz:¡
~
E-4
en
I
I
.
f
I
I
!
f
i
)
t
.
¡
¡
...~
i_I '
".,'-, i
' , I
'J
" f
.
;>1
t.·;~I]
;{--~'~
·¿¡Ff
t\~,~
J '\",-;~
I :,;~J
',I?i
i,J:~
":, t":~
~~,~
QJ.
ø
.....
....:I QJ
QJ s::
,- s:: OJ ......
...... CJ ...:¡
~ .....
~ woe
CI) ,..
ctS QJ ~CtS
e ~ en >t
(
d
o
-r-4
.a.J
C\1 ^
CJ 4-4 ~
o 0 s-a
...:¡ OJ
+J >
$-Id"""
OJ -1"'4 ,...f
.µ 0 <1J
(1) Po. "'d
~'-'
OJ
s::
erf
~
"'d
~
C'CS
>t
OJ
CJ
s::
OJ
~<
-r4
co
Q)
~
.a.J
ctS
d4-4
o 0
~
.µ.µ
res d
0.,.."
o 0 ~
...:¡p..s-a
'-'QJ
,..' >
QJ .-r-4
'µ~r-f
QJ . QJ
~P-4"'d
OJ'
d
......
~
Q)
CJ
~
>
s-a
Q)
en
(e
r,
Q)
Q) s::
U er-f
'1j s:: ~
Qj cu
CI} "'CJc:Q QJ
0 -r-f U
CI} -r-f
0 C1J :>
~ ~ ~
Pot Q)
~
~ '~ 'Q"'-;
Q) Q
'" 0
s:: er-f l
::J .µ
ctJ ~
QJ U~ :>.
c o ,0 ~
-rf ~ .QJ
~ .µ ~ ~-~
s::
QJ QJ (1).,.........
U S .&.J 0 (1)
.,... '"d QJ p."'CJ
> d ~'-' E-4
J.4 QJ
(e Q) ~ ~
CI)
~
"C QJ QJ
s:: CI} .s ~
~ .,... QJ
~ s:: ...:¡ E-t
OJ u .,...
s:: s:: ~ en
-M ~
H J..I '"d
JJ:.t ~
'U ctS
$-f :>t
~
>e
~ ,~ . .- " "'~-
0 .a.J
ctS
s::
0 QJ S::~
.,... u 0 0
..... s:: .,..
.,... C1J .&.J.&.J
C "'CJ< ctJ s::
.,... ..-t U -rot """"
t.a-I en 0 0 ~
QJ (1) t-1P-t ~
Q ø:: '-'(1)
~ :>
QJ e-r-f
0 .&.Jt-1M
C1J . QJ
~P-t"'d
OJ
s::
.....
~ <U
c::
,. Q) Q) .,..,
U t-1
s:: .,...
.,... :> "'d
t-1 ~ ~
QJ ,('(j
en en "Þ-f
le etS
~
e
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCEAMEN01NG AND CHANGING A FRANCHISE,ORDINANCE
ENACTED BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT.,COUNTY,
TEXAS, ON APRIL 10, 1967 AND BEING PARTLY STYLED, IIAN ·
ORDINANCE GRANTING TO LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, A CORPORATION,
ITS SUCCESSOR AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO FURNISH AND SUPPLY
GAS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS"; AND PROVIDING FOR A MODIFICATION OF THE
DEFINITION OF THE TERMS "SERVICE LINES" AND nYARD LINES"
REFERENCED· IN SECTION 7 THEREOF. .
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COU~CIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS;
e
SECTION~..l. As of the effective date of this amendatory ordinance,
and upon acceptance by Lone Star Gas Company of the provisions hereof,
Section 7 of the aforesaid captioned franchise ordinance enacted on
April 10, 1967, shall be stricken, cancelled and nullified and there shall
be substituted iri lieu thereof a new provision reading as follows:
"SECTION 7. In addition to the rates charged for ga.s
supplied, Company may make and enforce reasonable charges,
ruJes and regulations for service rendered in'~he conduct
of its business., Company shalí have the right to contract
with each customer with reference to the installation of
any and all of the gas piping from the connection thereof
with the Company's main in the streets or alleys to and
throughout the consumer's premises. Company shall install,
own, operate and maintain all service lines~ which are
defined as the supply lines extending from the company's
main to the customer's meter where gas is measured by
Company. The consumer shall own, operate, and maintain
all yard lines and house piping. Yard lines are defined
as the underground supply lines extending' from the point
of connection with Company's customer meter to the point
of connection with consume,r's ho~s,e piping. II
SECTION 2. Enactment of this amendatory. ordinance shall in no way
ever be construed so as to diminish or impair any consumer's ownership
'interest in service lines (or portions thereof) installed prior to the'
effective date of-this amendatory ordinance.
SECTION 3. The terms and provisions of thi's amendatory ordinance
s~all be deemed to be severable, and if the validity of any section,
sentence, clause or phrase of this amendatory ordinance shoúld be declared
to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of any other section,
sentence, clause or phrase of this amendatory ordinance. .
SECTION 4. Except as .heretofore and hereinabove changed and
amended, the terms, provisions, conditions and requirements of the aforesaid
franchise ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
e
e
e
e
tt.
SECTION 5. This amendatory ordinance shall become effective as
of ',' , , 1981 if the Company fi 1 es its wri tten· acceptance
of the provisions of this ordinance within sixty (60) days after its final
passage and approval by this City and upon acceptance, the provisions hereof
shall be binding upon City and Company, thei'r successors and assigns.
Passed and approved on this the,
day of
, 1981.
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeane.tte Moore, Ci ty Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
·
·
·
DATE: October 8, 1981
,..
/
SUBJECT:
Rpsolution ca~ting vpj:p for ni'rprtnrfor th~, Tarrñ.nt
County App,ra is~Dj s tri çt
DEPARTMENT: êdministration
BACKGROUND:
by resolution from the
either spread their votes
to all nominees or give them to one.
--_.~.---------_. -..- "<---..--
.P'..---.
-",,,,,,"
.--+<
""~,,....-....~.".."- .
~~:/~~~~:-~-
- -- ~---
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQ1TlRED:
Approve Resolution
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
ACCOtrnT NUMBER:
""
~~-~--~~~~--~~~~~~~~--~~~-----~---~~---~~~~~~-----~-----~-~~~~--~~--~-~~~~~~-~~-~
e
MADRIN HUFFMAN
. COIJNTY CLERK
e-
e
TARRANT, COUNTY
FORT WORTH, 'fEXAS 76102
ROBERT M. PARTEN
CHIl!:I" DEPUTY
September 25, 1981
Honorable Mayor Dick Fara'm
P. O.Box 18609
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
To The Presiding Officer of City of North Richland Hills
This is to notify you that your taxing unit under
the Tax Appraisal District of Tarrant County will. receive
the number of votes listed on the attached exhibit in the
selection of the 1982 board of directors. .
Please furnish this office your nominees before
October 15, 1981.
Sincerely yours,
m~Jc
r·1adrin Huffman
Tarrant County Cl erk,
i~H : c f
"
(
(
Page 4
p & Z Minutes
September 24, 1981
AMENDMENT
APPROVED
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing
and called for anyone wishing to ,speak
in favor of ,or in opposition· to this
amendment to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak~ the
Chai"nnan closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Bowen moved to approve this amendment
, as written.'
This motion was seconded by Mr. Hannon and
the motion carried 4-0.
OLD BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
None.
The meeting adjour~ed at 8:00 P.M.
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
. . . .. .. . .
,_ SECRETARY PLANNING 'AND ZONI.NG COMMISSION
~ '
e
e
It
VOTING STRENGTH FOR TARRANT COUNTY
TAXING ENTITIES FOR
1921-32 TAXING YEAR
CITIES, TOWNS & SCHOOLS VOTING ENTITLEMENT
Aledo I . S. D. NONE
Arlington I. S. D. 665
Azle I. S. D. . 25
Birdville I . S. D. 215
Burleson I. S. D. NONE
Carroll I . S. D. _ 15
Castleberry I . S. D. 15
Crowley I . S. D. 45
Eagle Mountain-Saginaw I . S. D. 60
Everman I . S. D. - 40
Fort Worth I . S. D. 880
Grand Prairie I . S. D. NONE
Grapevine I . S. D. 100
Hurst-Euless-Bedford I. S. D. 230
Keller I . S. D. 30
Kennedale I . S. D. 10
Lake Worth I. S. D. 15
Mansfield I . S. D. 40
Northwest I . S. D. 5
White Settlement I. S. D. 35
Godley I . S. D. _ NQNF
City of Arlington 365
City of Azle 10
City of Bedford 35
City of Benbrook 20
City of Bluemound NONE
-
City of Briar _- NONE
City of Burleson NONE
City of Colleyville 15
City of Crowley 5
City of Dalworthington Gardens NONE
page 1
VOTING STRENGTH FOR TARRANT COUNTY
TAXING ENTITIES FOR
1981-82 TAXING YEAR
CITIES, TOWNS & SCHOOLS VOTING ENTITLEMENT
Edgecliff Village NONE
City of Euless 40
City of Everman 5
City of Forest Hill 15
City of Fort Worth 850
City of Grand Prairie NONE
City of Grapevine 35
City of Haltom City 30
City of Haslet NONE
City of Hurst 55
City of Keller 5
City of Kennedale 5
City of Lakeside NONE
City of Lake Worth 5
City of Mansfield 10
City of North Richland Hills 60
Town of Pantego 5
City of Richland Hills 15
City of River Oaks 5 -
City of Saginaw 10
City of Sansom Park NONE
City of Southlake 5
City of Watauga 10
City of Westlake NONE
City of Westover Hills 10
City of Westworth Village NONE
City of White Settlement 10
Tarrant County 940
page 2
·
·
·
RESOLUTION NO. ~. I / /1
Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North
Rich1and Hills, Texas, that:
its vote for
County Apprais
Passed and approved this
day of October, 1981.
Dick Faram - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND'LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
.
.
.
.....
DATE: Oçtober 8" lqRl '
/-:?
, ~..l..
SUBJECT:
Public HearinQ on Corrmynity Developm~nt Prnjprtc: (~~rqtlti hearin~)
DEPARTMENT:
Administration
Ri chard -8.lQj n wi 1 uresent thi s ; tpm.,
BACKGROUND:
CITY COUNCIL ~CTIONIŒQUlRED:
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
-----------------~----------------------------------------------------------~--------
.
.
.
./
DATE: October 8, 1981
It
f.
SUBJECT:
Resolution fo~ participat~on in Community Devel,opment Projects
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: Pass resolution for c~ participation in the Block Grant.
CITY COUNCIL ~CTION ItEQUlRED:
Approve Resoltltion
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBE~:
~~~-~~-~-~----~~-~~-~~~---~---~-----~~--~~~-~~~~-~-~-~~~-~~--~--~~~~~-~-~
J
.
ED JACKSON
DIRECTOR
TARRANT COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 W. Weatherford Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Telephone
(817) 334-1267
September, 25, 1981
To Mayors and City Secretaries of the
Mayors' Council of Tarrant County
It is time once again to secure cooperation agreements from all cities
participating ,in the Tarrant County Consortiwn. These agreements will
again enable us to obtain Community Development Block Grant Funding un-
der Title I'of 'the Housing and Conununity Development Aët of 1974.
.
Although the cooperation agreements are basic,ally the same as the ones
used in the past, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980 re-
quired a few changes. These changes àre fully discussed in the attached
HUD Notice CPD 81-9. 'The principal change is that the agreement must
cover a three year period. During the three year period of.qualifica-
tion, no included unit of general local government can be removed from
the urban county for Community Development Elock Grant purposes, nor can
any units of general local government covering additional geographic area
be added to the urban county during that period. As in the past, a city
is ineligible to compete for funding through the Small Cities program as
long as it remains a part of the consortium. Minor wording changes to the
agreement were also required.
Tarrant County will be eligible for approximately $2, 820, 000 in 1982. By_~
approving the attached cooperation agreement, your city will be assured
of having a voice in deciding how to spend a guaranteed amount for each
of the next three years. As you know, undèr Tarrant County's Community
Development Program, funding decisions are made by the Tarrant County
Mayors' Council with the County having final program responsibility.
A copy of the Agreement has been included with the letter for review and
adoption by your City Council. Please place adoption of the Agreement on
your next City Counci'l agenda. The Agreement must be signed and returned
no later than November 13, 1981, to the Tarrant County Planning Department.
The wording cannot be changed. We recommend that you simply complete and
adopt the attached resolution instead of re-typing it.
If we can be of further assistance, or answer any questions concerning
next years' funding or HUD procedures, please feel free to call on us at
any time.
. stn-~YI
~ }/
~ø :~n
Director
Tarrant County Planning Department
.
.
.
....
.~~:
. ..
'11/
J(
RESOLUTION APPROVING & ENDORSING
THE PLANNED THREE-YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
FOR THE CITY OF . NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , TEXAS
WHEREAS, the City of
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
shares in a cooperative,
agreement with Tarrant County for, essential community development assistance
activities under Public Law 93-383, The Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974, and
WHEREAS J. one public hearing for the purpose of identifying and discussing
community development needs, and one public hearing for the purpose of receiving
and adopting' community development projects, proposed in the ,three-year plan"
have been duly held by th~ Ci~y of
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
, and
WHEREAS" after said public hearings and due consideration, the City
Council, City of
~ORTH RICHLAND HILLS
J determined that the project"
MACKEY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, PHASES IV-VI
, was eligible for funding
under this Act, and ap,proved the filing of application for said funding" and
WHEREAS, it is understood that any funds not expended on the specifically
approved ,project will revert to the Community Development Contingency Fund"
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council, City of NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS
, that said planned three-year co~unity development
projects for the, City of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'. be approved and endorsed.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
12TH
OCTOBER
, 1981.
day of
Mayor
ATI'EST:
. C·i ty Secretary
.
.
.
DATE: 10-7-81
I .I
/1 ~
SUBJECT:
Final Payment - Precinct Line Water System Extension
DEPARTMENT:
Utility
BACKGROUND:
Leonard Hazel has completed this project and has requested final
payment. The project has been approved by our City Engineer
and Construction Inspector.
Total Project Cost
$158,845.90
$129,243.05'
$ 29,602.85
Less Previous Payments
Difference Due
As of this date, TRA has not completed their 24" line to North Richland Hills.
O,nce completed, we will be ready to accept the water.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQUIRED: Approval of pay estimate in the amount of $29~9Q2.85
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES X
NO
ACCOUNT Nù~BER:
~~--~~~--~~~~~-~~-~-
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
October 7, 1981 '
Honorabl e Mayor and City Counci 1
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E.Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-545, CITY OF NORTHRICHLAND HILLS,
PRECINCT LINE ROAD WATER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.3 AND FINAL
We are enclosing a copy of Estimate No. Three (3) and Final, dated
October 7, 1981, made payable to Leonard Hazel, Inc., in the amount of
$29,602.85, for materials furnished and work performed on the subject
project. The quantities and condition of the job have been verified and
checked by the City's Inspector, and we have checked all extensions. It is
our understanding that the City forces have monitored trench density control
and in the absence of any negative reports, we recommend that the above final
payment be made to Leonard Hazel, Inc., P.O. Box 48098, Watauga, Texas 76148.
.
This project includes the extension of a 16-inch and 24-inch water line from
Rumfield/Eden Road eastward to Precinct Line Road as required to tie into the
TRA transmission main at the proposed supply póint. We understand that TRA
water is expected to be available this year.
In accordance with Section 3.2.11(a) of the Contract, the two (2) year term
of the Maintenance Bond will begin on this date, and therefore, will
terminate on October 7, 1983.
The original time bid on this project was 60 calendar days and the contract
completion date was September 3, 1981. Since the lines were substantially,
complete and ready for service before completion of the TRA line, liquidated
damages were not incurred, and therefore, should not be assessed on this
project.
We will be present at the October 12, 1981, Council Meeting if you have any
questions concerning this project.
~~(
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA:bvg
cc: Mr. Cecil Forestêr, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
t1r. Bill Rut 1 edge, Ci ty Ins pector
Leonard Hazel, Inc.
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
CON T RAe TOR t 5 EST I MAT E
- - ,- - ~ - - - .- - - - - -
. , ::--~ ".l...
r PI;' 0 F 21;
FILE F3545 1
TI.E NO.- 3 & FINAL JOB NO.~ 3-545
OJ ' DESCR I PT ION- PREC I NCT LINE ROAD~,WA TSR SY S rEM;- EX tENS IONS ~' , ?'./ I ,'~ ;):-j J
NER~ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICH~AND HILLS, DATE- ,101 7/81
ME CHARGED THRU PERIOQ~ 87 DAYS CONTRACTOR- LEONARD HAZELt INC.
R MATERIALS FURNISHED AND, LABOR PERFOR""ED IN PERIOD~e:NDI~G-,:~,~9/30/'81,' ::': ("
RK ORDER DATE- 7/ 6/81 CALENDAR OAYS- 60 COMPLETION DATE- 9/'3/81
~ IV (ì
..
ITEM DESCR~PTION
----------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ~---~~--_:
AMOUNT
.24'· WATER PIPE
· 16" DIA. WATER PIPE
· 12't DIA. WATER PIPE
· 24·· GATE VALVE W/4' t BYPASS
AND BOXES
.16" GATE VALVE W/4' t BYPASS
AND BOXES
· 12t. GATE VALVE AND BOX
· 6ft GATE VALVE AND BOX
· 6ft BLOW-OFF, BRANCH & SUMP
MANHOLE
· 1t. COMBINATrON AIR RELEASE
VALVE AND VAULT
· FIRE HYDRANTS
1. .' DIA. (CL. 50) DUCTIL~
IRON FIRE HYD. LEAD PIPE
· DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS FOR
LESS· THAN 12" PIPE
3. DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS FOR
12" AND OVER PIPE
14. BORE OR TUN. & PRES. GROUT
30' t WELDED STEEL CASING
5. CRUSHED STONE PAVEMENT REPL.
(FLEXIBLE BASE)
7. PIPELINE MARKERS
8. STOCK GATES
9. CONCRETE ENCASEMENT FOR
16.1 WATER PIPE
o. CONNECTION TO EXIST. TRA
24" WATER LINE
.
PREVIOUS THIS
UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
L.F .'
LB.
LB.
L.F.
L.F.
EACH
EACH
L.F.
L.S.
280.00
3542.00
0.00
1.00
3.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
2.00
15.00
0.00
7027..00
100.00
805.00
0.00
3.00
125.00
1.00
TOTAL
116.16
0.00
72.00
396.16
3542.00
72.00
1.00
2.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
3 . 0'0
1.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
15.00
85.00
85.00
7415.00 14442.00
0.00 100.00
0.00 805.00
6.00 6.00
0.00 3.00
0.00 125.00
0.00 1.00
UNIT
PRICE
31.90
20.S0
15.20
6532.5q
3583.30
822.00
363.00
1111.75
831.15
900.00
10 .0-0
1.00
1.50
112.50
s.oo
46.70
225.00
6.0·0
959.00
-, .' - - .. \..
. '\
12637.50
73673.60
1094.40
13065.00
10749.90
822.00
1089.00
_ 0 .00,
1662.30 t1,
1800.00 ~i
150.00
85.00
21663.00
11250.00
6440.00
280.2,0
ó75.00
750.00
959.00
. ,a .
- - - - -, - - - - - - -
- - -- ... - -- - -
'p 2-- OF' 2
FILE F3545
CON T RAe TOR· , 5
EST I MAT E
STWTE NO.- 3 & FINAL JOB NO.- 3-545
RO T DESCRIPTION- PRECINCT LINE ROAD WATER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS
WNER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DATE~ 101 7~'~~
IME CHARGED THRUPERIOD~ 87 DAYS ·CONTRACTOR- LEONARD HAZEL, INC.
OR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 9/30/81
ORKORDER DATE~ 7/ 6/81 . CALENDAR DAYS- 60 COMPLETION DATE- 9/"3/81
o.
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
. ¡..~.
ITEM DESCRIPTION
PREVIOUS THIS
UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
AMOUN:T
-------~---------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------~--
~ .. ' . ....
IELD VERIFICATION OF JOB CONDITIONS
NO CONFIRMATION OF PAY QUANTITIES
y-c:~-~~~--~~--
(OWNER'S PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE)
ATE- ,19
, ~
-----------------------
-------~--------~------~---~----~-----------------~------------------------~-----
, -
------~-----~----------
TOTAL .............
LESS 10 PERCENT RETAINED. . . .
DIFFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . ":.. \,
PLUS 75 PERCENT MATLS ON HAND. .
TOTAL .............
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS . . . . .
DIFFERENCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE. .
NOTE-PAY LAST AMOUNT SHOWN
158845..90
0.00
158845.90
0.00',
158845.90
129243.05
29602.85
PPROVED-
NOWLTON~ENGLISH-FLOWERSt INC.
e TING ENGINEERS
r.~?e
----~--------------~------------
ATE- O~ 7 .1931
OT AL E'ARN I NGS C I NCL. R ETA IN. ) -$ 158845.90
IME CHARGED THRU THIS PERIOD- 87 DAYS
TOTAL BID-$ 153760.79 PERCENT- l03.~OJ
TOTAL TIME- 60 DAYS PERCENT- 145000
e