Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 1980-02-25 Agendas
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1S CITY COUNCIL AGENDA cor the Meeting Feb-ruary 25, 1980 , at 7:00 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. . NrUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN E-C UNC IL MEETING_ 6.00 - 1. Cons tderation of Contract between urst, Tarrant Count, N. Richland _ _1 _ 1 s of Pre0nct .Line Road 2, Consideration of an Ordinance -amending _ ..Ordinance N .. 336 - Gas Code 3,i Consi-deration of Traffic Engineering Contract Proposal with PAWA, Incor orated regardtn 'Traffic Signals -- COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 1, Cal to order 2, Roll Call Invocation 4, Minutes 2,_1-;80 Considerati•on & A proval of Ordinance DC> _ for PZ 79743 , Request of Jerry Stevens Lakes Addition Second Fili.n , _Meadow s —r'uui ji ii.cariiiy held- �6. _-� Public Hearing Appeal Hearing for PZ 79-44 - Request of Roy L. KeHey, Jr. to rezone Block 19, Clearview AddMon �~ from Commercial lo ommercia peciis Use - Sale of Used Autos �7. Consideration & Approval of Ordinance for PZ 79-44 8. Public Hearing,- PZ.80-1 --.Request of _ Robert E. Noble & Charlie Davidson to rezone Tract 2A, Abstract 1625 & Lot 4 E120'3 Block M & Lot N165'23' Block N Smithfield Addition from Agri c_ul ture to proposed Classification 9. Consideration & Approval of Ordinance for PZ Public Hearin - PZ 80-2 - Request of�^ _ _RFV Corporation to rezone Tract A. - Block A, Richland Plaza Addition, from -u �- Commercial'& Industrial to proposed Classifi.cation of Industrial 11. Consideration & Approval -of Ordinance for PZ 80-2 - Public Hearin - PZ 80-3 - Request of Thomas Johnson with Big Tom's �- Bar-B-Q to rezone a portion of Block 2, _ Richfield Place Commercial Addition, _ ____ from Local Retail to proposed __ Classification of -Local- P,etail--- �_� S eci fi c Use - Sale of Alcoholic- Beveraqes CITY of NORTH R I CHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 7rr the Meeting in9 February 25, 1980 at 7 :00 p.m. , in the City Nall , 7301 N.E. Loop .820 ..}_ ;' tt3 ER ITEM ACT LN TAKEN Consideration & Rroval 0 0 rdi n nce I for PZ 8073 14, Cons tderatfon & 8pproyal of Pa met t Universal Tank & Iron Works Inc in---. the amount of $27,157,95 2 0 G _ Elevated Storage_ Tank Burse Road Estimate No. 6 15, Consi-derati'on &-Approval of Rgpest from Larry W. DZ xson Arch,itect for Payment of Construction Chan e Order for Central Fire Station -in the amount of ®dra 00 to Wal ke Constructs on Company 16 v Consideration & 8pro 1 to reimburse a Traffic Control D'v'sion f o Genera and in the amount o 3 5. 0 00 f.Qr --- 17 Consideration & Ap.pro a1 T f is �+ En [ neeri n Cont act o s al 0th -- PAWA Jn co r o rated, - regArdi-nq Traf ffc- Si nals �18. � 19T -� 200 Consideration & ,. A r ' Li a i = t Insurance Consideration & Approval of an Ordinance . amending r irnance No. 336 Gas Code Adjournment POST -COUNCIL MEET IN . Discussion of Audit 2. Discussion of Mechanical Code 10 fI* 1 4D MINUTES of THE- REGULAR tlEETING of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, FEBRUARY 11, 1980 - 7:00 P.M. 1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order February y 11, 1980 CALL at 7• � TO ORDER .00 P*M% 2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor ROLL CAL L LL Lena Mae Reeder Councilwoman John Mi chener Sid Cavanaugh Councilmen Jim Cato STAFF: - Tom Paul City Mianager Paula Burgess City Manager's Secretary Jim Anderson Director Public Works Richard Albin City Engineer Rex McEntire City Attorney Gary Cal&,,,-11 Building Official Ma-rgi e Nash Planning & Zoning Member ABSENT: Denver Mills Councilman Jim Wood Councilman Dave Freeman Councilman Jeanette tioore City Secretary 3. The invocation was given by Councilman Mi chener. 4. Councilwoman Reeder moved, seconded by Councilman Michener, to approve the minutes of the January 28 1980 meeting, Motion carried 4-0. 5. City Manager Paul advised the Council this sane request" was granted last year. t1r. Paul stated he recom;mended approval, Councilman Mi chener moved, seconded by Councilman Cato to approve substituting Veterans Day, (Tuesday, November 11) , to Friday , Novernber 28, and swing day to be taken Friday, December 20' . Motion carried 3--1 ; Councilman Mi chener, Cato and Councilwoman Reeder voting for; Councilman Cavanaugh voting against. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTEr 1-28-80 APPROVED APPROVAL of SUBSTITUTING VETERANS DAY (FRIDAY, NOVtMBER 28, AND SWING DAY TO BE TAKEN FRIDAY, DECEMBER 26 APPROVED February. 11, 1980 f Page 2 6. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning PS 80-2 - REQUEST OF Q had recommended approval of this request subject to the ARNOLD F. WILLIAMS signing of a covenant for future street improvements. FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 3 BLOCK 33 NORTEX ADDIT- Councilman Michener moved, seconded by Councilwoman ION Reeder, to approve PS 80 subject to the signing of APPROVED a covenant. Motion carried 4-0. 7. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning PS 80-4 - REQUEST OF had recommended approval of this request subject to BIRDVILLE I.S.D. FOR comment #1 in the Engineer's letter regarding the FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1 installation of a fire hydrant. BLOCK 2 M S ITHFIELD Councilman Cavanaugh moved, seconded by Councilman ADDITION ADDITION Michener, to approve PS 80-4 subject to the Engineer's r. lette g Councilman Cavanaugh asked why the city could not ask them to plat Lot 2, even if it was not going to be built on. Lot 2 would be part of the use of Lot 1. Mr. Albin stated Lot 2 was only going to be used as a playground. Councilman Cavanaugh stated that was true, but if the State was trying to get the city to plat all property, then the city should consider getting the school to plat the playground. Mayor Faram asked if there was a reason the school did not want to plat Lott. Mr. Albin stated the school's engineer stated at the Planning and Zoning meeting they did not plat all of it into Lot 1 because they would have to provide water and sewer for Lot 2 and it was only going to be used for a playground. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Albin if he had any problems with the school not platting that lot if it was going to be used for a playground, City Attorney McEntire stated the city could make the y school plat the lot in the future. Councilman Cavanaugh stated he thought it was just a basis for an issue to get around the fire protection, sewer and water. Councilman Cavanaugh amended his motion, seconded by Councilman Michener, to state "subject to the Engineer's letter, comment #1". Motion carried 4-0. lie February 11, 1980 Page 3 I* I* 8. Mayor Faram advised the Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval of this request. Councilwoman Reeder moved, seconded by Councilman Michener, to approve PS 80-50, Councilman Cavanaugh stated it seemed to him that when people came in for re -platting it was not the city's place to represent them. They should represent themselves. PS 80-5 - REQUEST OF GLEN BUCKNER FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 17 R & 19R, BLOCK 3, BR I ARWOOD ESTATES APPROVED Mr. Anderson stated the staff preferred for them to represent themselves. Mr. Anderson stated this was not a request on Mr. Buckner's part, it was a demand on his part that Mr. Buckner get the problem taken care of. Mr. Anderson stated that sometime ago the Council approved a plat on a couple of lots on this same Court and there was a problem of a driveway extending over a property line that should have 41 erted him but it did not. Mr. Anderson stated he later got a call from a i rate citizen indicating they had purchased a piece of property with a boundary line shown in a particular manner and closed on the property.. After they closed on the property all of a sudden _the stakes were moved and they lost about four feet of yard. They were unhappy about it and they wanted to know if Mr. Buckner could change the line. Mr. Anderson stated he assured those people the plat that was filed for record was a controlling document, the stakes would have to match the plat. Mr. Anderson stated that at this point he called Mr. Buckner and asked what was going on. Mr. Anderson stated he found out there was a foul-up in the survey. Mr. Anderson stated Mr. Buckner stated the kids moved the stakes around and the people pouring the slabs did not dig down and find the pins, Mr. Anderson stated the fact of the matter was where the slabs went in did not match the boundary lines and Mr. Buckner was changing these lines after the people had closed on the property to suit himself. Mr. Anderson stated that at this point he demanded Mr. Buckner have the property re -surveyed and clear up the boundary problem to protect the people living on that Court. Mr. Anderson stated Mr. Buckner engaged a surveyor who re -surveyed the tract. Mr. Anderson stated that in effect Mr. Buckner was complying with the demand of the city. Councilman Cavanaugh stated what concerned him was that the people were concerned about how much land they were losing. Councilman Cavanaugh stated they were losing approximately 4 feet then it was narrowed down to 1.4 feet and it appeared this was not definite. Mr. Anderson stated basically all the property owners were in agreement with this replat. Mr. Anderson stated Mr. Buckner would have to furnish a new plat to all the people involved. Councilman Cato aske6 if this was 1 F-9 zoning. February 11, 7 980 Page 4 16 Mr. Anderson stated the zoning was 1 F--9 or 1 F-9-15. Councilman Cato asked what the minimum lot size was. Mr. Anderson stated he thought that when this was '1 atted square q et. it was 9,000 s feet. p Councilman Cato asked fir. Anderson if he knew the date a t of the original platting. Mr. Anderson stated it was approximately 1975. Councilman Cato asked the City Attorney if the Council had the right to grant a deviation from Ordinance 179. Mr. McEntire stated the Council hadthe right to grant the variance. Councilman Cavanaugh stated the bray he understood it there were just slabs on the lots at this time, Mr. Anderson stated no, homes were already built and most were occupied, Councilman Cavanaugh stated if this ever 9 happened again he would like p for the city to red -tag it and have them Put another whole slab down, Motion to approve carried 3-1; Councilman Cato and t-li chener and Councilwoman Reeder voting for; Councilman Cavanaugh voting against. 9. Mayor Faram advised the Council that Dr. E. K. Hahn had been previously appointed to this committee and could not serve. Councilman Cavanaugh moved, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder, to approve E. F. Crites for the Industrial Development Committee in place of Dr. E. K. Hahn. Motion carried 4-0. Mayor Faram instructed the City Manager to write Mr. Crites a letter thanking him forvhi s willingness to serve. Also, write Dr. Hahn... 14. Councilman Michener moved,seconded by Councilman .Cavanaugh, to approve payment to Vial ker Construction Company in the amount of $54,535.00. Councilman Cato stated he was under the im&ression the last time one of these bills was -paid, thy,, a was some discussion on no one in the city puttingsignature on these r a 9 equests._Councilman Cato stated he did not recall if the Council decided to have one of the city inspectors oversee the construction, . APPROVAL OF E.F. GRIT IN PLACE OF DR. E. K. HAHN - INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE APPROVED CENTRAL FIRE STATION $54s535*00 CONTDERA-. T I ON AND APPROVAL- 'OF PAYMIENT TO WALKER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR PERIOD 1-1--80 TO 1-31-80 FROM LARRY DIXSON9 A.I.A., ARCHITECT APPROVED February 11, 1980 Page 5 I* I* Mayor Faram stated Mr. Dixson was present if there were any questions. Mr. Larry Dixson, 7001 Grapevine Highway, Suite 408, appeared before the Council.. Councilman Cato stated he noticed on the form that Mr. Dixson had signed on the application for certification for payment that all he did was attest to the fact that this came from the contractor and that was his signature. Councilman Cato stated that no where on the statement did he see any indication the amount asked for or the amounts for work completed. Councilman Cato stated that normally when the city inspectors signed off for request for payment on contracts, they attested to the amount of completion or the amount of work done. Mr. Dixson stated that on the first sheet of the statement was the amount asked for and the sheets following broke down what had been completed. City Attorney McEntire stated Mr. Dixson certifies to the best of his knowledge that work had been completed. Councilman Cavanaugh asked Mr. Dixson if he made the performance report out. Mr. Dixson stated he made the performance report out and inspected the work. Motion to approve carried 4-0. 11. Councilman Michener moved, seconded by Councilman Cato to postpone this item. Councilman Cato asked if this ordinance could be routed through the Planning and Zoning Commission before it came back to the Council. Mayor Faram stated he also would like to study the ordinance before it went to the Planning and Zoning Commission and would ask Mr. Paul: to set up a worksessi on on it. Motion to postpone carried 4-0. 12. Mr. Paul stated this ordinance was passed by the Council on January-14, 1980, and the City Attorney said at that time we would have to come back and pass another ordinance which is the.one the Council had before them. Mr. Paul stated this ordinance incorporated everything that was in Senate Bill 390 and also incorporated the things that were in Ordinance No. 792, Mr. Paul stated the City.- Attorney had checked the ordinance and felt there was nothing in it contrary to Ordinance 792 or the State Law, CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF AMENDING ORIDINANCE 488 - SALE OF MIXED BEVERAGES CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE FOR TEXAS RETIREMENT SYSTEM APPROVED ORDINANCE NC.798 February 11, 1980 Page 6 0 0 Councilman Cato moved, seconded by Councilman Cavanaugh to approve Ordinance No. 798. Motion carried 4-0. 13. City Manager Paul stated that in the third line from the bottom in the specifications it stated the new experience modifier had not been received. Mr. Paul stated he felt that anyone bidding for the policy would need the experience modifier, therefore, he had asked Austin for it. Councilman Mi chener moved, seconded by Councilman Cavanaugh, to approve the specifications as presented to include the experience modifier. Councilman Mi chener asked Mr. Paul if he would have the experience modifier before the policy expired, Mr. Paul replied yes. Motion to approve carried 4-0. 14. Councilman Cavanaugh asked that someone explain this resolution, City Manager Paul stated most of Precinct Line Road was in North Richland Hills city limits. Mr. Paul stated North Richland Hills and Hurst had been discussing for some months the possibility of Hurst taking over the entire street. They had made no commitment yet but, said they would like to go to the Urban System rather than try and get enough money to make Precinct Line a presentable street. Mr. Paul stated that if they got the Urban System that they would come back and ask North Richland Hills to work with them on the right-of-way and possibly give them the right to assess for curb and gutter. Hurst would have to come back to North Richland Hills for this privilege, Councilman Cavanaugh stated that was not stated in the letter from Hurst. Mr. Paul stated this was a request for an Urban System Grant and if granted they would have to come back and do this all over again. Councilman Cavanaugh asked if half of the street belonged to North Richland Hills. Mr. Paul stated that in this case most of the street belonged to Hurst. APPROVAL OF SPECIFI- CATIONS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE APPROVED RESOLUTION WITH CITY OF HURST CONCERNING PRECINCT LINE AND WATAUGA/SMITHFIELD ROAD FOR CONSIDERATION RESOLUTION NO. 80-6 APPROVED February 11, 1980 Page 7 0 Mr. Anderson stated the part under consideration tonight be 1 onged to North Richland Hills. 11r. Anderson stated this was a preliminary step to get this section of road into the Federal Urban System Network. Once in the Federal System Network, it becomes available for Urban System Funding. Mr. Anderson stated at this point and time if the State decides to spend Urban System Funds on this project they were going to be looking for a sponsoring city. Mr. Anderson stated it was not going to be North Richland Hills, as the city had more pressing priorities. Mr. Anderson stated the State would not pay for curb and gutter so North Richland Hills would have to pass a resolution to give Hurst the right to condemn right-of-way on North Richland Hills side and allowing them to assess for curb and gutter. This resolution was just to let the State know North Richland Hills was willing to let Hurst assess.. Councilman Cavanaugh stated the thing that bothered him was that he did not want Precinct Line to look like Grapevine Highway where the south side had no curbs and gutters because Richland Hills did not have the funds for such. Mr. Anderson stated this would not happen to Precinct Li n.e because the State would not allow it to happen, Mayor Faram stated that Grapevine Highway was a State Highway and it would not have curb and nutter on the south side. Mr. Anderson stated he was not aware that Grapevine Highway would not have curb and gutter on the south side. Councilman Cavanaugh asked why North Richland Hills and Hurst could not apply jointly. Mr. Paul stated this was discussed with Hurst and since North Richland Hills had applied for Rufe Snow there would not be anyway North Richland Hills could get funds for Precinct Line also. Councilman Cato asked the City Attorney if the Council passed this resolution did they retain the right to set a priority for this particular project should the State decided to go ahead with the funding. Mr. McEntire stated yes, Hurst had no power whatsoever with respect to Precinct Line Road. Mr. McEntire stated the primary problem was aqui si ti on of right-of-way and assessments. Hurst had no power whatsoever to do this without a resolution from North Richland Hills Council. February 11, 1980 Page 8 Councilman Cato asked if the passage of this resolution would weaken North Richland Hills povier to .assign low priority to it should it come through, Mr. McEntire stated no. Councilman Cato moved, seconded by Councilman Mi cheter, to approve Resolution No. 80-6. Motion carried 4-0. 15-a. Mayor Faram stated the structure for the Tax Appraisal CONSIDERATION OF for Tarrant County was adopted by a vote by the RESOLUTION G . DESI.�NATING Mayor's Council by a vote of 37-2. Those two in ATTORNEY$ FOR TAX opposition were the City of Arlington and the City of DISTRICT Fort Worth, Mayor Faram stated now the Ci ty of APPROVED Arlington feels they have been short changed and RESOLUTION NO. 80-7 they want to bring a lawsuit against everyone who is a taxing entity in Tarrant County. Mayor Faram stated there were some mixed feelings in the Mayor's Council to the pursuing of this lawsuit. Mayor Faram stated that unless there was a mechani sm by which taxes could be collected, there would be no tax collection in the year 1982.. Mayor Faram stated it was not 100/ in the Mayor's Council that they should go in and defend this. There are some who want to see if there was a happy medium ground on which the City of Arlington could meet with the rest of the group. Mayor Faram stated he argued against the suit because he felt a vote of 37-2 was an overwhelming vote in favor of. Mayor Faram stated he felt that after several sessions with the. school districts, should the structure be changed at any point now that it is set up there is going to be someone unhappy and there would be another lawsuit. Mayor Faram stated it was important that this get settled to enable assessing and collecting of • taxes for the year 1982, .. Mayor Faram stated there was some disagreement as to who the a- torneys would be to represent this group, Mayor Faram stated he felt it needed to be gotten off high center and let the courts make the decision. Ir. McEntire stated most of the cities wer e represented at the meeting where this lawsuit was discussed and everyone realized that unless something was done immediately this case would still be pending i n -1982 and no taxes could be collected that year. !Ir. McEntire stated there were some sixteen lawyers at the meeting representing cities and school districts. The ones who represented cities, in effect, asked him George Staples and Henry Kerry if they would form a team to do this. Mr. McEntire stated he undertook the task of going to Arlington and making a proposal to get this moving. February 11, 1980 Page 9 Mr. McEntire stated if the Council would rove on the lawsuit, waive formalities he could. get it through court one way or the other. Mr. McEntire stated he, George Staples and Henry Kerry had a meeting to try and* determine hoer to get this moving and came up with the $0.12 per capita and if most of the cities do not join that will not be enough. Mr. McEntire stated if the Council passed the resolution they should accompany the resolution with a letter from the Mayor that the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to pull out of the group if not enough cities join in order to finance the defense. Mayor Faram asked Mr. McEntire if he foresaw a lawsuit coming one way or the other with the school district - or City of Arlington so that it would have to be settled in Court. Mr. McEntire stated he personally felt it would have to go to Court to be settled. Councilman Cato moved, seconded by Councilman Mi chener, to approve Resolution No. 80-7 with the following additions: North Richland Hills be inserted in the appropriate blanks; in section one the team of Rex McEntire, George Staples and Henry Kerry be inserted as hereby employed and the end of Section 2, $0.12 per capita be added. Mr. McEntire stated an accompanying letter should state the City of .North Richland Hills reserves the right to withdraw from the consortium in the event the total funds pledged by other cities was not sufficient to pay the defense. Motion to approve carried 4-0. 15. City Manager Paul stated this was the insurance that covered PROPOSAL FOR PUBLIC Public Officials, Mr. Paul stated all Boards and Commissions OFFICIAL LIABILITY were also covered under this insurance. Mr. Paul stated INSURANCE there were only two companies he knew of that wrote this ALEXANDER & ALEXANDER insurance. Mr. Paul stated he would personally like to stay with Alexander & Alexander Insurance. Councilman Mi chener moved, seconded by Councilwoman Reeder, to approve the bid of Alexander & Alexander. . I* February 11 , 1980 Page 10 I * t 0 U Councilman Cavanaugh asked if only one bid was received. Councilman Cato asked the City Attorney if the city could accept the bid without having gone out for bids. City Attorney McEntire advised the Council to go out for bids. Mayor Faram asked if the insurance covered the various d lOUS Boards and Commissions. Mr. Paul replied yes. Councilman Cato stated the specifications needed to specify a number of the people that were to be covered. Councilman Mi chener withdrew his motion, Councilwoman Reeder withdrew her second. Mayor Faram stated he recommended takingbids and exploring the possibility p oring po sl bl 11 ty of covering Board members and Commissions servicing the Council. Councilman Cavanaugh moved, seconded by Councilman Cato to advertise the Public Official Liability Insurance for bids and see that all Boards and Commissions appointed by the Council were covered. Motion carried 4-0. 16. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of February 11 ' 1980 Mayor Faram announced that the Council would go into executive session for discussion of other matters. ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary Mayor Dick Faram ADJOURNMENT Cityof xoicrth Richland Hills., Texas MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: THOMAS PAUL - CITY MANAGER DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 1980 SUBJECT: WORK SESSION - COUNCIL AGENDA TOPICS WORK SESSION It will be necessary that we hold a Work Session prior to the next regularly scheduled Council Meeting on,Varch loth. The work Session needs to include Fossil Creek Park" Bowling Al 1 ey a}nd Skating Rink Ordinance, Flood Insurance, Mixed Beverage Ordinance, Street Master Plan; water Rates ; and one Civil Service r\arChurch I� would recommend that we old the wo�r�kshop on either Tueebruary 26, or Tuesday, March The reasons for these dates on Wednesday nights a d previously scheduled meeting COUNCIL AGENDA - POST -COUNCIL ITEMS ..AUDIT I Sf Since the Council Meetings should not last for more than 1%--2:-`}.._ p hours, I felt the Audit was important enough to put on a Post --Co unc i 1 Meeting, MECHAN I CAL 'CODE You have discussed the Mechani ca i Code previously, and i-t should not' take too much additional time at the Post-Councii Meeting, pdb (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18009 / NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 NNICE TO :� - x �r : • ; at •k �; k k - -r x - r �r �k x :C�r :�c* * "ITY COUNCIL 11EMBERS, �- �• •�- •k �- * •fir � �; � � :�C k .k -�: •.� � -�c � •* •�F � * x �k � � �k •k�r �'k 3: 7k •#• :� � •� * � .'� � ar :: �c � � * � :k �F �r � * 7r �r •k �: �- �c •* � � �� -: �' r`• ' �': -�: ;� :;- � -'� -k � �: ;� * � � -.:� ;r ;a..s.7_ •ir :r �r yc •fir -� � -.c * * •�; •.f :�: �r x ,�• ;tr :c x �r •� • �• •7r •.�• �': �F ;k 7c •7k k �; •k � k � •k �c * �- � ..� * �: �c•*�c ., ,c�c�., *7c�r*�c k�kx� k��c*�F�4•�r�r k���**•r. �c��c�k•�c•� B R. E A K F A S T M E E T I N G GRAHAM MAGiN ET 1C S CHAM3 ER Oc C01''VERC E Sf��i LE L B �, � IEU r 1 FEBzi';,'lRY 2 tm �•3O A. i-82O & HIP. 183 284-941EEI �c ,::�- �'- �; �• �c ; �• -.�: �,• � lr k �• x �• �E � c- •�c •�� x � -k �k -k ;c k •ic •k tiE• k •k a; �k• �: •�• -k :fir 7r -:c -,�C �; �r �r � k �• �c •�c •�; �E• �c• �• ;r � -k k �c � :� �c k •: � �: •yr 7c � � .. .. k ;r xr, •sr � :�• •.c ;'� � :� :k ;� :c �: � -�t- ;�- k �: �: ;+-- �: �• �c ~`� � :�• :c c :k �c �: �--t THERE WILL BE A S HO R'i-: AFTER'�.;AR�� '� .k •k x -x .n •k k •:'r -:"r :. ;� rF r � * �c �c �t � �k :fir �r �.• � sic k � k * �k �k k :'r �c �• n- �k�; �• ac• � ;� �r -;� •�k ; :'� :�: •x• ;ic -t- =c k :+- �::�E• •�::k •fir � . �c �- ;c• * •* + � . -i- • t . �. �r x � >: �r ,t x �r yr x ,•�. �; -r; � •k :: � � ;::�: � * �:.k .& yc •k •�r �• 7'r �: �c i UE S0 yOiI W T L.l_ i A rr LjD By Nu%0'% ` AS A RE1,1TN �h INORMATION Trinity Rive' Authority of Texas 0 Northam Region Office 70029101 February 18, 1980 City of Hurst 1505 Precinct Line Rd, Hurst, Texas 76053 Attention: Mr. A. J. Brown City Manager Gentlemen: raj Subject: Tarrant County Water Supply Project Consideration of Hurst - Additional Contracting Party Following your official request for service by the Tarrant County Water Supply Project, the culmination of much negotiation and discussion with all existing Contractin Parties has resulted in a Contract which is hereby offered for your consideration. . Attached herewith are ten (_- 10 ). copies of this Contract, together wi. th the necessary Res.ol uton and Certificate evidencing your approval, antici- pated to be considered in a meeting on February 26, 1980. Each should be execu- ted and nine. C9_1 copies returned to this office. As I indicated to you this date, th.i:s Contract is in a form -which must be. presented for consideration in Its. present state,- inasmuch as time for- negoti ati ng new terms and seeking approval of those new. terms -is 11mi.ted prior to the AuthQrity's February 27 Board Meeting. Copies of this same. Contract are bean delivered this date to the existing five Contract'' n Pa�rti. es- -for their cons i de.rati. on ,, and official Council action, prior totfe Aut?ority's February 27 Board Meeting. You should advise this office of any official action which your Council takes on this matter prior to, or during, your February 26.City Council Meeting. Sincerely, WARREN N. BREWER Regional Manager., Northern Region WNB:gd Attachments ,'. FlvF D FEB 2 �� .. Suite 302 Arlington Downs Tower MANAGU 2225 E. Randol Mill Road Arlington, Texas 76011 (817) Metro 265-2481 .(2) The City Council shall consider the request of the City Manager er and shall hear any person interested therein and shall determine in its discretion whether or not any violation by the operator was with just cause. (3) If such violation by the operator is f ound to have been with just cause, the City Council shall direct the operator to comply therewith within such time and upon such terms and conditions as are just and reasonable. (4) If the City Council shall determine such violation by the operator was without just cause, then the City Council may, by ordinance, declare that the franchise of the operator shall be terminated and forfeited unless there is compliance by the operator within such period as the Council may fix, (5) In the event of such revocation, the City shall have the right to purchase the cable system at a price not to exceed its then fair market value, considering the original cost of all tangible and intangible property, as well as the salvage value, the book value, the replacement cost, cash flow, and other facts, exclusive of good will, or any right or privilege granted by operator's franchise. Should City decline to purchase the system, the operator shall have two (2) years from the date on which it ceases operation to remove, at its own expense, all portions of its cable television system from all streets within the City, and the �--� restore said streets and ways to a condition reasonably satisfactory to the City within that period of time. Sec. -28. Other Business Arfivif taQ Operator shall not engage in the business of selling, repairing, or installing television receivers or radio receivers within the City during dur' Q the term of the franchise. Local shareholders of operators owning more than ten per cent (10%) of the operator's stock shall likewise not engage in such business. Sec. -29. Comnunit Cable TV-AdvisorL Panel There is hereby established a 7 place con.ity advisory. panel .wh_ose- function it shall be to monitor the operation of the cable television system'to insure compliance with the -provisions' of this ordinance. '"he panel shall handle citizen complaints and be empowered to hold hearin s. t g o s ti , verify allegations and arbitrate citizen/company differences. In addition, the panel shall aid the cable company in screening applicants for time on the public access. The panel shall report to the City Council on a quarterly basis. Appeals from the panels' findings shall be handled by the City Council. The Committee members shall be appointed by the City Council for a term of two (2) years and shall include at least one member from each of the following vocations, local clergy, Birdville Independent School District, Tarrant County Junior College, City Staff, Council and two (2) citizens. Places 1, 31 5. and ".7 shall. -'be "appointed in June of - each.: odd numbered year, and -places 2-, 4, and 6. shall be appgint,ed in June .of, each, even numbered year. The panel shall elect its own chairman and secretary from among its membership and shall schedule at least one meeting per month. Sec. -30. Lock -out Devices Each premium or box office subscriber hook --up shall include a key operated lock -out device to permit the subscriber to interrupt such 0 hook-up and prevent its use at their discretion. L__j Sec, -316 City shall have the right to approve the change of stock of company if fifty-one per cent (51%) of the stock changes hands, or if other companies and/or people are in control of the company. Sec. -320 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is held unconstitutional, or otherwise invalid, such infirmity shall not affect the validity of the ordinance, and any portions in conflict are hereby repealed. Sec. -330 The City Secretary is hereby authorized to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses hereof as an alternative method of publication provided by law: 13 10 [ 0 City of rtli R exas 7 1 I! February 13, 1980 TO: City Manager I FROM: City Secretary r The rice for the 14 Karat old service pin i s p 9 � E $60.25 each. This price is based on the ordering of ~- pins. If less than 12 are ordered the price Jw is higher. i . E i 4 - . fI 1 f f i t City of orth Texas t Date: February 20, 1980 To: Tory Paul, City Manager From: Bobbie McCorkl e , Court Clerk Ref: Statistical Report Tom, you will note in the report below the increase over the last month in Municipal Court. This increase is due to the motorcycle patrol. The STEP program! beginning next week will also increase the work load with the issuance of approximately 200 more citations each month. With this increase, more money will be coming in and more court cases with additional court sessions,, I feel additional hel will be needed to handle the work load and I wou d e e 11 oss as a u time employe.............. . . . . . . e.. a emporary emp oyee to help us with this Ancreas Citations January 1979 January 1980 February 1-20 Traffic 238 252 199 Edon -Traffic 154 170 158 Ordinance 14 98 20 Parking 117 180 173 Total 523 700 550 - / Increase 32/ 340% (23% per day) Deposits $79218.00 $129209.91 $99373.95 / Increase 11% 69/ (19% per day) El Respectfully, Bobbie McCorkle .4 - R E" C P.- I V e D FEB 2 0 1980 CITY MANAGER (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 19 INDEX IN - SEE PRE -COUNCIL COUNCIL 2 19 3 17 POST -COUNCIL REMINDER B R I N G AUDIT 10 4 10 r0 0 City of Forth Richland dills, texas DATE: February 14, 1980 TO: Thomas Paul , _City Manager FROM: James Anderson, Director of Public Works SUBJECT. Letter from A.J. Brown Concerning Precinct Line Road 1. I have reviewed the subject letter and offer the following comments: a) This project is likely to be very low prio-rity for the City of North Richland Hi 1 l s , and it seems unlikely that we would wish to parti ci pate in a Right -of -flay acquisition program. b) A portion of Precinct Line Road is already a part of the Urban Systems Net and we vioul d have to pay market val Lie, well documented, for any Right -of -Way taken. A t a k i ng in any other mariner, except for platting dedication, would likely be reversed by federal authorities. c) It doesn't make much sense to spend money for engineering, for such a low priority project unless Hurst would agree to pick up the tab for Right -of -Way acquisition. d) The ratio of 1 to 3 seems fair in relationship to benefits if the decision is made to spend the money. 2. You may wish to put this item on a post council agenda to get the feelings of the counci 1 . James R. Anderson Enclosures (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH R iCH LAND H 1 LLS, TEXAS 76113 10 I* I* City of Hurst , Texas February 6, 1980 Mr. Tom Paul, City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. 0. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Tom: The attached contract has been prepared by the City Attorney to enable the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, and the City of Hurst to jointly undertake a Preliminary Engineering Study of Precinct Line Road from Grapevine Highway to Watauga -Smithfield Road, As we discussed in our recent meeting, this project may have a better potential for future Urban Systems Funding provided the right-of-way can be obtained in advance of project authorization. The widening of Precinct Line Road is important to an ever-increasing number of North Richland Hills, Hurst, and Tarrant County citizens living north of Grapevine; Highway. The attached proposal for preliminary engineering and right-of-way definition will provide topographic surveys, vertical profile, horizontal alignment and right-of-way, and preliminary cost estimates, Following this study, the Cities may proceed with acquisition of the necessary right-of-way. The maximum cost of this ' study will not exceed $20, 400 and the cost of North Richland Hills would not exceed $62800. It is my understanding that this project cannot be undertaken during this fiscal year. Therefore,, the attached contract calls for repayment following approval of the Fiscal Year 1980-81 Budget. It is our hope that you will agree to this proposal so that initial steps may be taken to undertake the widening of Precinct Line Road. Please contact me if I may provide additional information. V�sy trul�(/jours, A. JF /Brown Ci tytAanager AJB:ct cc: Jim McMeans 817 / 281-6160 METRO 498-2700 pZCJ-J'VP.D FEB 1-71.: CITY MANAGER 1505 PRECINCT LINE ROAD 76053 817 336-5773 C] f10 J TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS .. C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E N 5 December 21, T979 Mr. Jim McMeans, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Hurst 1505 Precinct Line Road Hurst, Texas 76053 Re: Precinct Line Road Widening, Grapevine Highway to North City Limits, Project Number 118-ST Dear Jim: In accordance with your instructions, we have prepared the following proposal for provision of consulting engineering services for the subject project as outlined in the scope of projects shown below. We understand that this proposal should be made for Level 3 and Level 4 of our Preliminary Concept Plan dated December 17, 1979. Level 3 shall include the following services: 1. Provide court house research and field control to establish existing right--of-way, and prepare right-of-way strip map (11=40" scale) . Strip map would include: a. Proposed alignment of thoroughfare (including poss i bl_e alternates, if any). b. Individual parcels indicating right-of-way acquisition requirements, but would not include field note descriptions and survey plats necessary for acquisition, itself. 2. Provide additional horizontal field surveys sufficient to prepare planiinetric drawings of':proposed alignment, 3. Prepare pl animetric drawings of proposed alignment, indicating all existing facilities, improvements, and obstructions along the proposed route. 4. Provide initial cost estimates for the project. Level 4 shall include all of the services in Level 3 plus the following: 1. Provide additional vertical control with horizontal surveys in Level 3 to be utilized in preparation of preliminary profile of the thoroughfare. The vertical control would include establishing bench marks, complete cross sections at 50 foot intervals, tie in of drainage control points, top of curb elevations at intersecting streets, and sufficient profile of these streets for use in final design. 210 West 6th Street, Suite 1200 Executive Plaza Building Fort Worth, Texas 76102 • Mr. Jim McMeans, P.E. Precinct Line Road Widening Page 2 U 2. Prepare preliminary profile of the thoroughfare on the pl animetri c drawings noted in Level 3, indicating all existing facilities in the profile. 3. Although included in the original Level 4 description, we understand that preparation of right-of-way descriptions to be used for acquisition of individual parcels i s not to be included in this proposal. Also included in both Level 3 and Level 4 would be our research of Hurst and North Richland Hills annexation ordinances relative to Precinct Line Road, and requested attendance at any work sessions with Hurst and North Richland Hills City Councils and/or staffs to discuss the potential for partial funding by -North Richland Hills. We propose to enter into the standard form of City/Engineer contract with . the City of Hurst to perform all engineering and related services in either ,of the above proposals as selected by the City Council . our compensation for furnishing these selected services, including local travel, supplies, and incidentals will be two and one-half (2-5) times the salary cost of the personnel assigned to the work. The salary cost will be the direct wages paid the employees engaged in the work plus 24.7% of these direct wages for fringe benefits as listed in the Manual of Practice for Engaging the Services of a Consulting Engineer as published by the Texas Society of Professional Engineers,, such as Social Security contributions, payroll taxes, etc. Direct non -salary expenses will be charged at current com- mercial rates for such work. The direct wages of the employees that worked on this project will be: Project Engineer $13.35 to $15.00 per hour Engineer $ 6.25 to $13. 35 per hour Draftsman $ 4.00 to $ 8.00 per hour Clerical $ 3.50 to $ 5.00 per hour We will also provide -all services relative to the horizontal and/or vertical control surveys as mentioned above. These services will be provided at the rate of $42.50 per hour for a 3-man field party. (No multipliers are at- tached to these surveying costs) . n i neeri n and surveling services for Level 3 or Level 4 will be provided in accordance with the above met o o compensation, bu shall not exceed $17,000 or $20,400, respectively. Upon completion of the preliminary design study for the subject project, should our firm be selected to complete construction plans for this project, we would estimate the total (not to exceed) fee for preliminary and final design including the right-of-way strip map and furnishing of right-of-way parcels, but excluding project administration and construction staking, to be approximately $69,300. This figure is based on an estimated construction cost of $1,250,000, the estimate of which was derived from assuming a 61 ' .street section with 8" lime stabilized subgrade and 8" H. M. A. C . Mr. Jim McMeans, P.E. Precinct Line Road Widening Page 3 10 Should you desire further information or explanation of any portion of this proposal, please do not hesitate to call. We appreciate the op- portunity to offer this proposal and would count it a sincere pri vi 1 ege to be selected for this assignment. Very truly yours, TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. J . Richard Perkins, P.E. JRP/dat P. S. After thi s i tem has been di scussed by the Counci 1 , we woul d be most happy to provide you with further information regarding the proposed time schedule for the completion of the selected proposal. r I* 10 0 0 THE STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF TARRANT X CONTRACT Ap i- r-96 The parties to this agreement are TARRANT COUNTY, hereinafter called "County"; the CITY OF HURST, a home rule city of Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "Hurst"; and the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, a home rule city of Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "North Richland Hills". WHEREAS, Precinct Line Road is a boundary between Hurst and North Richland Hills, and the improvement thereof is in the common interest of l.)oth cities as well as of the County in which they are * located; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to obtain prelimin- ary engineering for and to participate jointly toward the cost thereof, so as to expeditiously undertake the acquisition of neces- sary right-of-way and they wideningand improvement of Precinct Lin p e Road between Grapevine Highway and Watauga -Smithfield Road; NOW, THEREFORE, WIT14ESSETH For and in consideration of the mutual undertakings hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. Hurst agrees to contract for Dreliminary engine- ering of Precinct Line Road between Grapevine Highway and Watauga - Smithfield Y g Smithfield Road at a cost not to exceed $20 , 400 as proposed by Teague, Nall and Perkins, Professional Engineers, which proposal is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. 2. North Richland Hilts agrees to reimburse Hurst the sum cif $6 , 800 . 00 which represents one-third of the cost of the Project set forth in 1. above, such sum to be__. paid on or before November 1, 1980. - 3. County agrees to reimburse Hurst $6 , 800 . 00, which sum represents one -4hird of the cost of the project set forth in 1. ab o tie . _ Y a. 4. Such sums to be paid by North Richland Hills and County shall be paid within ten days of receipt o ' Y p f copies of bills from Hurs t' s contractor for work completed, ted except xcept that North Richland Hills' payment need not be aid until l; November 1, 19800 This contract is made and, entered into effective March 1, 1980, and shall expire and be of no further force an d effect on December 31, 1981, or the completion o p f the improvements herein provided for, whichever shall occur first. CITY OF HURST 0 ATTEST: %JVCX11 r��� ��� , %..i-Ly z�ecrerary ATTEST: Jeannette Moore, City Secretary By: B. J. Hampton, Mayor CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Dick Faram, Mayor TA RRAN T COUNTY By: Mike Moncrie f , County Judge By: County Commissioner By. County Commissioner By: County Commissioner By. County Commissioner CONTRACT -- PAGE TWO �Al 0 U /l W� G _�_ � c..c 10 10 9 0 PUBLIC !x]ORKS INFORMATION SHEET ' #2 FOR PZ 79-43 I have reviewed the revised plat of Meadow Lakes, 2nd Filing and find it generally acceptable for Zoning urooses only, Numerous additional requirements will be added to the actual final -plat such as: (1). Dedication of roads (2). Engineering sealing (3). Flood plain certifications (4). Additional easements for utilities (5). Etc. The lot arrangement is generally good and all of the lots appear to be suitable for building. I would request that you add the following stipulations to the notion for approval: Me Building lines on Lot 4, Block 11, Fossil Creek Trails Addition, and Lot 85 ,- Bl ock 3, Meadow Lakes, 2nd Filing, be revised to 30 feet. (These are the two lots on Riviera Drive east of the drainage easement and need to harmonize with the adjacent property.) (2). Homes on corner lots with 25 foot and 15 foot building lines rust face in the direction of the 25 foot line, (3), Approval is subject to the provision of the additional, utility easements requested by TESCO and the city. (4), The City does not accept dedication of, or maintenance responsibility for, the lagoon drainage easements, cc: Jerry Stevens Spai n7Ayres & Assoc, Richard Albin PUBLIC WORKS INFORMATION SHEET ON PZ 79-43 This zoning request from MF, LR, & 1F-12 to PD is to comply with a council request. Part of the zoning includes a tract now in Haltom City which is proposed to become a part of North Richland Hills. You may wish to specify in your motion that all or part of the zoning is contingent upon the-boundry realignment taking place. , The area is proposed for high value single family homes. However, the developer is taking advantage of Multi -family setbacks of 25 ft. , com- parable to what now exists in Diamond Loch. In my opinion, the engineer's comments contained in Paragraph 2 of the November 19, 1979 review letter are not applicable since single family homes are proposed. This area is located in a previously designated flood plain and the cer- tification and map revision specified in Paragraph 4 of the November 19, 1979 engineer's letter will certainly be required. The lakes adjacent to the plat, while not a part of this zoning, are nonetheless a factor to be considered. The developer is currently rebuilding both dams to high standards and should be able to meet Texas dater Resources standards. Al- though the city has the option of assuring design review responsibility for these dams, you may not wish to assume it. In that case, the developer would apply for a permit to the Texas Water Resources Agency! This could be a time consuming procedure, but might tend to relieve the city of any liability connected with flooding caused by the dams or the failure of the dams. The straightening of Fossil Creek has already been accomplished without authority from City, State, or Federal agencies, but apparently with their tacit approval. You will note that our engineer has requested calculations detailing the impact of these improvements on downstream property. The effect of all the drainage improvements taken together should be beneficial to Big Fossil Creek. That portion of the zoning now in Haltom City, if developed as proposed, should result in a property tax income to the City of North Richland Hills of about $25,000 per annum. 0 K NOWLTON- ENGLISH- FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth -Dallas November 19, 1979. Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3--9.12, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLANS , * PS 79-43 , MF to PD We have reviewed the captioned materials for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We have received the subject zoning case for our review. and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the P1 anni.ng & 'Zoni.ng Commission and the City Council. 2. In accordance with the provisions of Article V1II, Planned Development District, as outlined in the Zon ng Ordinance, the following items should be contained in the Development Plan but have not been included in the subject materials for our review: a. Paragraph (c) - Building plans and layouts. b. Paragraph (d) - Qffsite parking layouts, c. Paragraph (e) -- Building coverage. d. Paragraph (f) - Screening and landscaping plan. 3'- In reference to Item 3. of our review letter dated May 179 1979 (REF. A), detailed hydraulic calculations have not been presented showing the effect of improvements to B.i g Fossil Creek and Tributary No. 7 (Fede . ral Flood Insurance Study Report designation) for the 100-year, ultimate watershed development, runoff discharge. 4.: A certification statement showing com R l iance with FIA criteria presented in Chapter 10, Section 1910 of the F1 Code of Federal Regulations should be affixed to the plans as described in Item 4 (REF. A).'Al though the proposed drainage channels appear to provide capacity for the calculated 100-year storm runoff, the developer must submit a report to the F.I.A. and receive concurrence from that agency that the proposed improvements do real.i gn the designated flood„ hazard boundaries. 1 t� 550 FIRST STATE BANK SLOG. - BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 • 817/283-6211 - METRO/267-3367 4 - I* Page 2 -- Planning & Zoning Commission -- November 19, 1979 5. The size of the proposed box culvert on Riviera Drive has not been shown on the Plans, nor the size of the drainage channel (Tributary7).crossinoi g Riviera at this point. In any event, extreme care should be exercised in performing excavation and construction work under the 21-inch sanitary sewer recentlyinstalled ed in R'v' y Riviera. era. Proper sheeting and shoring and bracing of the line during construction is required. 6. The developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of' the recently constructed 21-inch sanitary sewer line in Riviera which will service the Meadow Lakes area. Based on the ultimate quantities of sewage flow expected from the service area tributary to the entry point into the 21-inch sewer line, we suggest that an equivalent 10- i nch line would be required. We estimate pro rata at $14.00 per lineal foot for a total length of 1,560 feet. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call-, We RICHARD W. ABLIN , P.E. RWA:b ' vg cc:Mr. James Anderson, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities I* Page 2 -- Planning & Zoning Commission -- November 19, 1979 5. The size of the proposed box culvert on Riviera Drive has not been shown on the Plans, nor the size of the drainage channel (Tributary7).crossinoi g Riviera at this point. In any event, extreme care should be exercised in performing excavation and construction work under the 21-inch sanitary sewer recentlyinstalled ed in R'v' y Riviera. era. Proper sheeting and shoring and bracing of the line during construction is required. 6. The developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of' the recently constructed 21-inch sanitary sewer line in Riviera which will service the Meadow Lakes area. Based on the ultimate quantities of sewage flow expected from the service area tributary to the entry point into the 21-inch sewer line, we suggest that an equivalent 10- i nch line would be required. We estimate pro rata at $14.00 per lineal foot for a total length of 1,560 feet. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call-, We RICHARD W. ABLIN , P.E. RWA:b ' vg cc:Mr. James Anderson, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities T + KN OWLTON NGLISH LOWERS INC. - CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth -Dallas May 17, 1979 Planning & zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301. NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas - 76118 Subject: 3-912, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND - HILLS, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION, 2hd ' FILING ', PRELIMINARY PLANS, PS 79-41 We have received the preliminary plans for the subject subdivision for our review and offer the following comments: 1. ' An overall drainage area map should be included in the plans showy ng -al l offsite drainage areas from adjoining property in addition to local runoff areas. P .Y 2. Detailed drainage calculations should also be included in the plans which indicate drainage area acreage, runoff coefficients utilized, times of con- centration, design frequency for storms, rainfall intensities, estimated street grades,. -gutter capaci ti els, storm drain sizing calculations, lagoon storage hydraulics calculations and other relevant data required for a proper review. .3 Hydraulic calculations should also be shown for'any im rovemen is propos ed for Big Fossil Creek, indicating channel cross sectional data, capacity, and discharge criteria. 40 - Due to the fact that a portion of this subdivision is within the flood plain area designated on the current FIA flood maps, a certification statement similar to that shown below should be added to the cover sheet of the plans: I certify that -the- construction plans for Meadow Lakes, Section II in North Richland Hills, located in Tarrant County, Texas, were re ared P P by me or under my direction on (dated , and I further certify that these construction plans were prepared in strict accordance with the' desi n criteria set forth in Chapter 10, Section 1910- of the Federal Insurance Administration's Code of Federal Regulation dated April 1, . 1973•0, _ Registered Professional Engineer M.P. Spain, PeE. Spain -Ayres & Assoc., Inc. 2342 Fabens Road Dallas, -Texas 75229 - (SEAL) We would also note that the current i FiA o0 0(in• flood boundary map preliminary nary form) s available abl a at the City Hall and i n our offices indicating the minimum finished floor house slab elevations in flood zone areas, which should be noted on the plat in the areas so affected -;In this subdivision. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. - MEOFORD, TEXAS 76021 - 817/283-6211 - METRO /267-3367 J �2- -Additional flood plain information for this area may be obtained from: Mr. John Ivey, P.E. Department of Housing & Urbanal Devel opmP_nt Region VI iloo Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75202 Phone. (214) 749-7412 - T this area have been performed by the Corps of Engineers.- Please Also studies Z n contact: Mr. Troy T. Lovell, P.E. Chief, Flood Plain Management Services Branch P De artment of the Army Fort Worth Di s tri C �i ,, Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 17300 Fort Vlorth, Texas 75102 Phone: (817) 334-3207 't Attorney should be contacted regardi ng any proposed City - Lim' i is 5. The City y this area as indicated on the preliminary mi nary plat, i f additional land revisions �n th> d Haltom City i s required for real i gnment of B.i g Fossil Creek. The propose from � Y � � � proposed 200 foot City Limit line appears to be along the northeast 1 i ne of the p p y �P tors City would be re - drainage and utility i ty easement of Big Fossil Creek. Hal y . . _ '' n this reach as it would be s ons 'bile e for all maintenance �.enance of Big Fossil Creek � contained within their City Limits. d be of nted out to the Co, , i ss i on that the use o f l agoons in this 6. It shout p � , . -. as detention ponds i s a storm water management tool which proposed subdivisionP � � . e wholeheartedly endorse i f properly designed. The desired red effect of these - lagoons � whol shear Y P P periods s 's to provide temporary storage of stormoiater during rainfall pert lagoon � p P d duce the peak runoff to values not significantly different from pre - an re development levels and thus reduce flooding downstream. - Though the Subdivision Ordinance does not address detention storage, we will work with the -Developer to assure that sound eng.i neeri ng practice i s employed in the Plan Engineer-. (a) Erosi on from storm runoff near the 'lagoons should be mi nimi_zed and the potential for downstream sedimentation problems may necessitate a syster, of silt traps. should be designed with proper storage capacity to avoid (b) The lagoons . a or ti on,during periods of dry weather or loss through porous soils.' ev p a . 9 P Special al linings ni n s or soil treatments may be required to avoid exfi l trati on P 9 tai ned at such levels losses.' Also the lagoon normal depth should be mai n as to preclude excessive weed grovith and check mosqui to populations . P • - - can also be serious problem Eutrophi cats on, or decl i ni ng water quality, Y in shallow lakes, and should be considered in the design. routing through the system of lagoons must be provided with (c) Overflowg . su sufficient ci ent -hY draul i c capacity ty to assure freedom from downstream damages f resulting from 100 year runoff peaks. (d) Since • ' ons of Shad Creek Trail,, Meadow Lakes Drive, and Riviera ports y Drive will serve as darns for the proposed 1 agoons , embankment quality an 0 0 dw 3- must be assured by the develope r. Erosion protection should stability mh face , where approac from the upstream point on the embankment be prove ded fr P , vel oc� t� es become si gni f1 cant, to bel oti� the downstream toe of the em- bankment. ' around each lagoon in addition (e) Flow age e asements should be provided to uti1 ity easements. • own on' the plat as suggested by • S subdz vz s� on should. be shown . The zoning of this a tl zoned multi -family (MF). 7 indicate that It is pres..n �. y the Council. Our records i n of all contiguous unplated property should be shown. 8. The ownership 9 .. Blocks 4 thro.ugh 10 should be renumbered 5 thro.ug h 12 to avoid duplication with. ' Meadow Lakes , - Section I - 10. Al P 1 of the ropOSed streets have not been named on this plat. • t exists along the south TESCQ 10-. foot drainage and utility i ty Basemen cement may be required 11' A Section I, and a similar ea Y t--of --wa in Meadow Lakes , S right-of-way on this subdivision as well. . • •n'murr� width criteria of 70. feet lots do not comply with the minimum - 32. � The . fol 1 owz ng 1 6 • and Block 9 , .Lot 15-. for this zoning - Block ock 3, Lots 532542 55, 5 • 'mum lot.depth th criteria of 100 • not coin ply with the minimum P, 13 Lot 37, Block 9 does •P s of the zoning ordinances feet as measured in accordance with the provision . should d be increased to 25 feet to - • s for the following lots h of 18; 14.. The side yard - - Ben 'intersections:- B1 lock 4 , L • n the bui 1 d� ng lot 1 i nes betty avoid offsets � Block 8, Lots 1 and i.l�. - -. Lot 7 -> Block 7, Lot 4; . and Block 6 > • and Zoning Cori scion * and e been rovi ded but the Planning 15. Spaces have P nts are not included on -the plat. Council en dorsement stateme sti n has not been shown on the water 3.6�. The exi9 8 inch water line in Riviera and sewer layouts • = 3 ' Lots 52, 53,' 54,. 55, 55, 57 - o inch water line ne serve rag Block � - _ 17 .. The proposed 4 � n � - and 58 should be increased to a 6 inch line. hydrant coverage has not been shown the intent appears to be 18.. Though fire by apartments are being planned s i den ti al requirement. if P to meet the 50fl foot re d be required. • nt 300 foot coverage wain for this level opine , review of this preliminary plan, an questions concerning the r Should you have y q - ease do not hesitate to calls please . RI HARD -VI. AL -BIN 2 P.E. RWA/ 1 i c cc: Mr. Thomas Paul , City Manager n Bronstad, Director of utilities Mr. Allen ubl �c WorksMr. James Anderson, Director of P IF • i NDS 55* 101 -- Prel' :ry Plat of Meadow, Ia';es 2nd - 2R" .: c. Southwesters Bell 08 First state Bank Bldg. 1901 Central Drive Bedford, Texas 76021 November 12, 1979 Mr . * James R. Anderson Director of Public Works City of north Richland Hills P. 0. Box 133o5 Forth Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. Anderson: As requested in your letter of October 23, 1979 we are returning the prep-manary plat of Meadow Lakes, 2nd Filing, with additional easen, ent s shown in red* if additional inforrr_a.tion is required, please contact Leo Rendon on 267-0151 . Yours very truly, M. L. Willia n. s _ Manager-OSP L;igineerir� Att. Northeast District It n U aRninancE No. AN.ORDINANCE REZOHiNG PROPERTY. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS*, . SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #I79, ZONING ORDINANCE 4F THECITY OF NORTH RTCHt.lND HILLS.' TEXAS*' ' ..: .PASSED, APPROVED. AND ADOPTED.- 8Y THE -PLANNING AND ZONtriG. C"ISSION AND THE CI'T'Y COUNCIL 0€ THE CITY. OF NORTH RICFiLAHD HILLS, NOVEMBER 1310 19679 AS AMENDED JANUARY 27, 1975 : . AFTER APPI2UPRIATE NOTICE AND PUSlIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING. RECMNt3A7I0N IS SUBMITTED TOTHE CITY COUNCIL OF 7i�tF CITY NORTH RTCNLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING ARID ZONING COMMISSION,�� . RESOLVED that on Case too. PZ 79-43 the Haitowing described -property shall be rezoned ft�ont. Multiple �amil�' Local' R'�ai� Planned Development .. .. ... .... . BEING a tract of land situated in Tarrant County, Texas, out of the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract No. 1520, and being more- particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of Lot 41, Block 3, of Meadow Lakes. an addition to the ,City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County., Texass as recorded in volumes 388 & 123, Page 28, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 32 degrees 02 minutes 50 seconds East, 436..E3 feet to a Point; THENCE South 65 degrees 50 minutes .01 seconds West, 285.00 feet to a point;. THENCE South 09 degrees 50 minutes 01 seconds West, 193.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 40 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds East, 300,00 feet to aPoi-nt; THENCE South'28 degrees 41 minutes. 41 seconds West, 160.00 feet to a P oint• THENCE South 70 degrees 50 minutes 40 seconds West, 180.00 feet to a point; THENCE -North 81 degrees 59 minutes 46 seconds West, 185.90 feet.' -to a point; THENCE North 46 degrees 19 minutes 52 seconds West, 54.10 feet to a point -,THENCE North 29 degrees 02 minutes 51 seconds West, 59.88 feet -to a point; P 3 THENCE North 48 degrees 09 minutes 58 seconds West, 44.15 feet to a point; THENCE North 77 degrees 28 minutes 03 seconds West, 75.46 feet to a point; THENCE North 83 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds West, 45.88 feet to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 06 minutes 41 seconds West, 336.70 feet to a point; THENCE North 84 degrees 16 minutes 05 seconds West, 60.25 feet to a point; THENCE -South 77 degrees 1;7 minutes 50 seconds West, 24.02 feet to a point; Page 2 THENCE South 48 degrees 32 minutes 16 seconds West, 27.28 feet to a point; THENCE South 16 degrees 11 minutes 29 seconds West, 29.36 feet to a point; THENCE South 04 degrees 07 minutes 60 seconds East, 83.93 feet to a point; THENCE South 40 degrees 05 minutes 16 seconds East, 81.40 feet to a point; THENCE South 43 degrees 24 minutes 18 seconds East, 50.11 feet to a point; THENCE South OO degrees 00 minutes 53 seconds West, 55.65 feet to a point on a corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 59 minutes 07 seconds West, 536.40 feet to a point being the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 27 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds, a radius of 343.34 feet, a tangent length of 85.09 feet, a chord bearing of North 76 degrees 03 minutes 57 seconds West, and a chord length of 165.19 feet; THENCE along said curve to the right an arc length of 166.82 feet to a point on a corner; THENCE South 27 degrees 51 minutes 15 seconds West, 406.83 feet to a point on a corner; THENCE North 38 degrees 35 minutes 60 seconds West, 256.2'5 feet to a point; THENCE North 42 degrees 08 minutes 25 seconds West, 715.90 feet to a point; THENCE North 43 degrees 39 minutes 33 seconds West, 804.44 feet to a point on a corner; THENCE North 72 degrees 43 minutes 25 seconds East, 2098.38 feet- to a point being the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 08 degrees 53 minutes 29 seconds, a radius of 1009.79 feet, a tangent length of 78.51 feet, a chord bearing of South 23 degrees 31 minutes 26 seconds West, and a chord length of 156.54 feet; THENCE along said curve to the right an arc length of 156.70 feet to a point; THENCE South 27 degrees 58 minutes.10 seconds West, 242.42 feet. to a point on a corner; THENCE South 62 degrees 02 minutes 50 seconds East, 129.93 feet along the south R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive (an 80.00' R.O.W.) to_a point being the beginning -of a curve to the left having a central angle of 59 - degrees 13 minutes 53 seconds, a radius of 1027.27 feet, a tangent length of 583.94 feet, a chord bearing of North_88 degrees 20 m.inutes 14 seconds East, and a chord length of 1015.31 feet; THENCE along said South R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive an arc length of 1061.97 feet to the point of BEGINNING and CONTAINING 3,097,196 square feet or 71.1018 acres of land, more or less. v Page 3 , Y Thi s property is 1 ocated south of Meadow Lakes Drive and North of Ri vi er - Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AHD. ZONING COMMISSION THIS 2gth DAY of NOVEMBER 91979. . CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING C ISS ON SECRETARY -PLANNING -AND Z NI C SS BE IT ORDAINED BY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE lei}.. PZ is HEREBY -REZONED. - T�IsDAY.OF 1 MAYOR DICK FAQ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND.-HILLS'ATTEST: = CITY SECRETARY jEANETTE MOORS - CITY OF ' NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAIND HILLS 1 i j 0 PUBLIC WORKS INFORMATION SHEET ON PZ 79-44 The request for special use zoning for used cars was turned down by P & Z primarily because of the nature of adjoining property, and traf*f is congestion at that intersection. Mr. Kelley indicates that he expects to be a "sub dealer" for a franchised Honda dealer. As you know, our zoning ordinance makes no provision for "sub dealers". It was my im- pression that P & Z was concerned that a used car lot at that location had the potential to become an eyesore. Mr. Kelley is currently oper- ating a stereo shop for autos at that location and would continue that business. The sale of used autos would apparently provide an income SUDplement for that property. I know of no compelling reason why the P & Z Commission should be re- versed in this matter. [- 0 I* BARNETT AND SWEET Mitchel! L. Barnett Arnold N . Sweet 12200 Park Central Drive, Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75251 (214) 233-8138 February 6, 1980 The City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 PO Box 13305 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Gentlemen: RE: APPLICATION OF ROY KELLEY, JR. BLOCK 19, CLEARVIEW ADDITION SOUTHEAST CORNER DAVIS BOULEVARD NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Please be advised that we would not favor use of the above mentioned property for the sale of used autos. We think this is not the highest and best use of the land, nor is it compatible with this business and residential area. It would, in our opinion, have a deleterious effect on the surrounding and nearby - properties. Thanking you for your consideration, we are, Very truly yours, BARNETT & SWEET A nold N. Sweet rim ri LJ Page 5 P & Z Minutes November 29, 1979 PZ 79-44 DENIED buyers and ,the people who already live there . He explained how they were try- ing to accomplish the work properly. The Chairman asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Knowles, to APPROVE PZ 79-43 subject to the Engineer's comments and at the discretion of the Director of Public Works and that a 2000 sq . ft. minimum floor space be added to the plat. Motion carried 3-0. Request of Roy L. Kelley, Jr. to rezone a portion of Block 19, Cl earvi ew Addition, from its present classification of Commercial to a proposed classification of Commercial - Specific Use -Sale of Used Autos. This property is located at the southeast corner of Davis Blvd. and Harwood Road. Mr. Roy Kelley represented his son who is the manager of the stereo shop at this address. He stated that since filing for this request, they have decided to handle new Honda cars,_ and a minimum of 2 year old cars. He show d the Commission pictures of the business and a drawing of . the proposed site. Mrs. Shaunty asked if he plans to remodel the existing building. Mr. Kelley stated wl l he plans to do is to fix the parking area after the gas tanks are taken up, and he plans to put up a stockade -- - - fence in back, plus a 2 rail fence around the front and sides. Mr. Anderson asked if he plans to service autos there. He stated the problem previously with turning a gas station into a car lot was an eye sore. fie stated the council is very much against this. Mr. Anderson stated he did not feel this would be adequate space to handle a new car dealership. He said t would be like Hel fm. an Motors, which certainly doesn't have enough room. He said we do no% want anymore like that. Page b P & Z Minutes November 29, 1979 Mr. Kelley stated they would have a maximum of 10 cars at a time since he would be kind of a "sub -dealer" for Honda, and they would be no older than 2 years. Mrs. Calvert told the Chairman that there were 2 letters received from property owners who were within 200 ft. of the property in question who were unable to attend the meeting but wanted to voice their opposition to this request. Mr. Anderson asked Mr. Kelley if he was going to be a factory authorized dealer. Mr. Kelley stated he would be connected with one. Mr. Anderson stated that according to the Zoning Ordinance, if Mr. Kelley can prove he is an authorized dealer, the present zoning is sufficient, he does not need the Specific Use zoning. Mr. Kelley stated he would still like to go before the City Council for their approval �� p of the used cars". He stated he has -a 5 year 1 easefrom Jack Roseberry, owner of the property. Mr. Knowles asked Mr. Anderson if there were any restrictions as to how many cars he can put on- the lot in regards to blocking the view. Mr. Kelley stated he would not put too many there because of this stereo shop. He will keep , the stereo shop in conjunction with the auto sales. The Chairman asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request. Mr. Knowles moved, seconded by Mrs. Hash, to DENY PZ 79-44. Motion carried 3-0 for denial. The Chairman told Mr.' Kelley he could go to the City Council and request an appeal, but if he could prove he is an authorized dealer, he would not need to. 1 I• F� 10 GOLF & 00�#- Y diamond S COUNTRY 5821 DIAMOND OAKS DR., FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117 PHONE 834-6261 F.CLUB Tuesday Nov. 27, 19-79 To Whom It May Concern: I Jack Rose. berry, dive Roy & Mike Kelley my permission to open a car lot at 5208 Davis Blvd, Jack Rose berry I* Mitchell L. Barnett BARNETT AND SWEET 12200 Park Central Drive, Suits 250 Dallas, Texas 75251 (214) 233.8138 November. 27, 1979 The Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 P. O. Box 13305 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Southeast Corner of Davis Boulevard and Harwood Road Gentlemen: Please be advised that we would not favor use of the above property for the sale of used autos. We think this is not the highest and best use of the land, nor compatible with this business and residential area. Thanking you for your consideration, we are, Very truly yours, MI TCHELL L . BARNETT AND ARNOLD N. ET By: Arnold N. Sweet ANS:dm Arnold N. Sweet { 10 r• n November 20,1979 James x•Anderson Director of Public Works City of North Richland Bills Dear Sir: Due to ill health we will not be able to attend the meeting November ,29th concerning rezoning of Block 19,C,learview additi.ong but feel we should be able to voice our views. •the traffic at that corner is unbelievable; we are nearer able to get out on Davis at Harwood. This rezoning would only make .the. problem much worse. `.'here are a good many school children who have to use that corner and it would be putting their lives in jeopardy even more than it is.. a 'used car' lot would certainly lower the valuation of our property,when we built oup house we certainly had no idea there would ever be a 'used car' lot this near. would any members of the zoning commission want a 'used car' lot this near their home: we hope you grill give our views some consideration. sincerely, fir. & Mrs. Floyd French 5204 Gibbons Drive Fort worth, Texas 76118 lie K NOWLTON- ENGLISH- FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth -Dallas November 19, 1979 P1 anni ng & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N . E , Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING -PLAT REVIEW, PZ 79-449 C TO C-SU-SALE OF AUTOS We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council . ICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA:mh cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities Mr. James Anderson, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. - BEOFORD, TEXAS 76021 - 817/263-6211 - METRO/267-3367 SCA Z- 6- -- / " = 3C � J +t3� o f North Richland !!ills, � ., - _ � L,� 8r . �r1 L. C C urn ty, Taxes., s�'la t� ; r` ►r jj �, C .�'cJ�.r$��., 3octior� accoreir, t 20 , o aS4 , of tt� DQod Rccojds of .Tarrant C'ot rrt A rye wtimlarly f2oAcribed tis follo"a: �' '�orthwoot• cornmr of Raid Plot W. -, �/ � point beir:� the irtpr�►�:tjors T7. 1 -n? of Stat,,e F. !' . Mi ghw6y too. 1938 with 11d Dail a s 3 tho South R R. p .'felt Bo �6st 'With said mouth 1 1m Block ©.�' r, s�-�so�d- Cll,d 'Dallas Rom s and t��o ck 190 1QJ.o Qw-�t; o7' Baat PnLral.101 aitn said Fiat li. of P Highway not 541 LVA and P�"l•Ail©1 with maid South lin,, Q 1 .P ��r��o��_._d DaIZy© to ^t-� ts� of aaic o f S _� ld Block 14 • ay t o• 3 p �i 1' Vent with said wq,ot lirm of }clock r a 19� 1a 9, �,na a,r�i.d r..,�ot �.a�� of 3 , 5*0 foot to tho pu OP f? ��31I'� . JNC� f �o �v�, FORT P. 0• SOX 7o ar 1 � i l�gt1 �-- t h,reby .certify thol then obove shm-in lot is A tr uo tend .� correC t rapresontotton of o Survey Q 00 1ho Surveyed \.�2���LF' 1 Et•- `.�.... . .jo _ _ ` "7 -.- ri 0 . _ ORDINANCEN0. AN .QRDI!'IAr{CE REZONING PROPERTY. IN ACCORDANCE . WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS,. ' SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE . OF THE 'CITY OF NORTH - RICHLAND HILLS-,- 'TES, PASSED. APPROVED: AND ADOPTED - BY THE . PLANNING AND ZONING . C"ISS ION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF NORTH. RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 139 19.57 , AS AMENDED ' JANUARY . 27 , 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND POLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING' RECOMMENDATION IS. SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL- OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH�O HILLS BY THE PLANKING TO ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No PZ 79-44 the folloWng described- property thatl . not be rezoned fry " Commerc i a l .. .... , ...... to Ton, mercTa-S ec•i fi c Use -Sal e' of US' 6d Auto SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills Tarrant Count Texas, and being a portion of Block 19, C1 earvi ew Addition,. 2nd Section, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-21 , Page 46, of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: ' BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Block 19, said point being. - . _ p g the inter- section of the East R.O.W. line of State F.M. Highway No. 1938 with the South R.O.W. line of Harwood -Old Dallas Road; THENCE South 89 degrees 54 minutes East with*said South line of Harwood -old Dallas Road-, and the North line of said Block 19,* 100.0 feet; THENCE South 0 degrees 57 minutes East and parallel -with said East line of " F. M. Highway No. 1938, 125.0*feet; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes West and parallel with said South line of Harwood -Old Dallas Road; 100.0 feet to a point in the East line of * sai d F.M. Highway No. 1938, * and the West l i ne of said Block 19; THENCE North-0 degrees 57 Minutes West with said West line of Block 19, and said East line of F.M. Highway No-, 1938, 125.0 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING. t rage 2 r• s r This property is 1 ocated • at the southeast corner of Davis Blvd. and Harwood Road.* DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND.ZONING COMMISSION THIS 29th DAY OF NOVEMBER 919790 00 CH.A I RMAN PLANNING AND ZON I NO COMI SS I ON 4.0 P. IV EC R NNI Z I S TO BE IT ORDAINED BY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND H I L Ls ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO., PZ IS HERESY - REZONED THIS __._. DAY OF MAYOR DICK FAIW4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND'HILLS ATTEST: - . 1 CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CATTY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 10 0 TO; Tom Paul, City Mana er DATE February 20, 19E0 FROM: Jim Anderson, Director of Public 14orks SUBJECT: Zoning cases for council rneeti n9,, -- Febru4r 25 80 PZ 80-1 APPROVED.� Request of Robert E. Noble p ' Charlie e (20 were contacted) Davidson to rezone Tract 2A, Abstract 1625 and Lot a r i , , E120 3, Bl and Lot . .1, N165'23, Bl R N., , Smithfield Addition, - from its -present classification of -Agriculture to a proposed classification of 1F-9-15. This property is located on the north side of Main Street just west of G1 en- ann Addition. PZ 80--2 APPROVED Request o f RFV Corp. to rezone ezone Tract A, (19 were contacted) Block A, Richland Plaza Addition, from its resent ' p classification of Commercial and Industrial to a proposed classification of Industrial, This rroperty is located on Grapevine . Hwy. y and bounded by Richland Plaza Drive and Broadway Avenue, PZ 80-3 APPROVED Request of Thomas Johnson with Big Tom s • (2 were contacted) Bar-B-Q to rezone a portion of Block 2, Richfield Place Commercial Addition, from its present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail -Specific Use -Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located in the Norri ch - Shopping Center at 7813 Grapevine Hwy. Page 5 P & Z Minutes January 24, 1980 • The Chairman asked if there was anyone speak else who wished to y . Mr. Greenfield roved, seconded by Mr. Eckhardt to APPROVE`� PS 80-5. Motion carried 4-0. PZ 80-1-_ Request of Robert ert E. Noble a-nd Charlie APPROVED Davidson to rezone Tract 2A, Abstract 1625,, & Lot 4, E120'3, Bl. M, & Lot N165' 23, Bl . N, Smithfield Addition, from its present cl ass i fi cation of Agriculture to • a proposed classification of 1F-9-15. This property is located on the north side of Main Street just west of Gl enann Addn . Mr. Anderson told the Commission that Mr. Noble was unable to come tonight and Mr. Davidson was still in ill health so the Commission could either table this request until next month, q h, or since this property is so familiar to the Commission, the could o ahead and y it 9 n d� scuss � t and act on it without the owners being present. Mr. Anderson stated this request is what the property owners of Gienann requested. The Chairman asked if there was anyone who wished to speak y p ak i n favor of or i n opposition to this request. Cheryl Groves, 6521 Chilton Drive said aid she wanted to know why the zoning sign was -not posted on the property site. Mrs. Calvert stated all the signs have been 9 e stolen or destroyed. Mr, Anderson stated these signs'�-Pre just a courtesy, and not required. Mrs. Groves asked what kind of houses were goi nq to be built and how many. Mr. Anderson -stated this is onlyzoning a request and there has not been a plat sub- mitted yet. He said when Gl enann Addition was built the minimum floor space was 1350 sq. ft. These will have a mi nimium, of 1500 sq, ft, with 9500 sq. ft. lots. Mr. Anderson stated that at the time Gl enann Addition Page 6 P & Z Minutes January 24, 1980 was built, the city was using the Southern Standard Building Code, but now uses the Uniform Building Code which is much more restrictive. So these houses should be better homes. The Chairman asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. Mr. Knowles moved, seconded by Mr. Green- field, to APPROVE pZ 80-1 as requested. "lotion carried 4-0. PZ 804 Request of RFV Corp. q o p. to rezone Tract A. APPROVED Block -A, Richland Plaza Addition from it s present classification of Commercial and Industrial to a proposed classification of Industrial. This property is located on Grapevine . and bounded b Hwy. y Richland Plaza Drive and Broadway Avenue, Mr. Thomas Eltings represented RFV in their request. He stated that since the new shopping malls opened, this center has be- come development manufacturing. He said they propose to develop it into industrial and show room office space, but this will be over a long period of time, Mr. Eltings said that right g now, the Tandy Corp, needs more facilities. He showed a plat of the property. They now have 420 employees and the addition would increase it to 620 employees and a 600 car parking lot. Mr. Eltings stated they would later add more construction as would be marketable. He said they now have a 150 ft. set back, and request this be vacated. Mr. Anderson stated you can not vacate a set -back line in a zoning case, they would have to replat the property. Mr. Eckhardt asked if they would later take over the theater also. Mr. Eltings stated they would. Mr. Greenfield asked about the additional traffic this would generate. He asked Mr. Eltings. if they would agree to making Richland Plaza Drive a one-wa u to the y P - Page .7 P & Z Minutes January 24, 1980 Jack-in-the-box so there would not be a bottle neck down there in the bottom. Mr. Eltings said he would rather Mr. Rice answer that. Larry Rice with Henry S, Miller Company p y said he thinks this suggestion would be a great idea, and they would be glad to have this street one-way, Mr. Rice stated this property was first occupied b Motorola y o a and when the, moved to their new facilities, Tandy took over. He stated Tandy has over a million dollar investment and he feels they have followed the right path making this Retail and Industrial so they could keep this area alive. Mr. Rice stated that Tandy is growing and needs to expand. He said they want to be able to keep them in North Richland Hills, Mr, Anderson stated that since this property � p y is in the flood plain , we will l have to enforce the flood plain requirement. This u developer will be required red t p qo build l d the floor oor 18" above the f ood l i ne or fl ood•-proof the bui 1 di n but he said he didn't see any serious pro- blems if the architect pays close attention to the problem. The Chairman asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request, . Mr. Gerald Bently, representative of Bi rdvi 1 l e I.S.D. stated they own the property adjoining property in ue this _ y question. He stated they are unable to build on their- property since it is in the flood plain. He said the cet the water that . y runs off the shopping center parking lot and would like them to be required uired to do something about the drainage. - Mr. Page 8 p & Z Minutes January 24, 1980 PZ 80-3 APPROVED OLD BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT Mr. E1tings said the Highway Department put in a box culvert and caused the water to run down across the parking lot. M Anderson stated they were not talking �r' about the front. He said the water runs off the parking lot, goes over the curb, and then runs across the Birdvi Ile I.S.D. property, Mr. Eltings stated they would work with B i rdvi i l e I. S. D. and would agree to f i x the drainage to their approval. Mr. Greenfield moved, seconded by Mr. Knowles, to APPROVE PZ 80-2 with -a strong recommendation to get with Birdville I.S.D. and correct the runoff problem, and also the developer should study the traffic problem. Motion carried 4-0. Request of Thomas Johnson with Big Tom's q Bar-B-O to rezone a portion of Block 2, Richfield Place Commercial Addition-5 from its present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail - Specific Use-Sale.of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located in the Norrich Shopping ng Center at 7813 Grapevine Highway. . Mr. DelbertStembrid-ge reresented Mr. John- son son in his request. He stated the property in question was at-7813 Grapevine . Hwy. at the corner of Davis Blvd. and Grapevine Hwy. Mr. Stembri d9 e said Mr. Johnson has a Bar -B-Q ,plan and wants to sell beer on premise with the food. He said he believed Red Lobster was the nearest place that sells on premise. The Chairman asked if there was anyone who i wished to speak in favor of or n opposition to this request. Mr. Greenfield moved, seconded by Mr. Knowles, to APPROVE PZ 80-3. Motion carried 3-1 with Mr. Eckhardt voting against. None The meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M. CHAIRMAN, -PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY, PLANNING .AND ZONING COMMISSION INFORMATION SHEET FOR PZ 80-1 You have already considered this tract on two previous occasions for MF and 2F-9 zoning. You approved the tract for ' dupl ex zoning,,_ but the council did not accept your recommendation. The developer has now requested* 1F-9 zoning. Al though_ I feel your original decision was a sound one, I cannot see any reason why this tract should not be approved for 1F-9 in vi ew of the counci 1 's feel i ngs on thi s tract.. I do have reservati ons about the marketability of single family homes in this location. If the city fails to zone this -tract, it seers probable that the courts will zone it for us. I recommend approval of this zoning request. U t 10 C KNOWLTON- ENGLISH- FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth -Dallas January 9, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-0029 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAUD HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-1 .. We have received the subject zoning case for our review *and find uat that we could adequately ely locate this property on the zoning ma should it be passed b both the Planning - � P • y ng & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ 1 j c cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Uti l'i ti es Mr. James Anderson, Director of Public Works w 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. - BEOFORD, TEXAS 76021 - 817/283-6211 - METRO/267-3367 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS,. . SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE -CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,. TEXAS, .: PASSED, APPROVED: AND ADOPTED: BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF = THE CITY OF NORTH. RICHLAND. HILLS, NOVEMBER 139 = 1967 , AS AMENDED ' JANUARY 27 , 1975. AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMATION IS SUB14ITTED T6 THE. CITY COUNCIL.- OF' THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLRID HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING C"ISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No,. PZ 80-1 the f.o.l.l.o.w.i.n..descriW r erty. shall .P P........to B E rezoned fMA r�i C u 1 t u r .. ... . Famil Dwellin s'with a min''''scL -• r ALL that certain tract or parcel of land out of the F. Woods � SurveyAbstract 1625, Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a steel rod called to be the Northeast corner of Lot 3, . Block M, Town - of Sri thfi el d accordi ng* to pl at fi 1 ed i n Vol ume 56, Page - 494, Deed Records, ' Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North-0 degrees 40 minutes 15 seconds blest 69.22 feet to a steel rod in the Southerly -right-of-way of Amundson Drive; THENCE South 45 degrees 24 minutes 20 seconds West 148.8 feet to a steel rod; THENCE South 0 degrees- 01 minutes 15 seconds West 38.07 feet -to a steel rod; THENCE North. 55. degrees 31 minutes East 129.5 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.132 acres of land, more or less. AND ALL that certain tract or parcel of land out of the F. Woods Survey, Abstract 1625, and the J . H . Barl ough Survey, Abstract 130, Tarrant County, Texas-, and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a steel rod at the intersection of the West right-of-way line of new Amundson Road with the North right-of-way line of Main Street, said point being called 165.0 feet South of the Northeast corner of J . H. Barl ough Survey; THENCE South 89 degrees 29 minutes 40 seconds West along the North right-of-way line of Main Street 469.22 feet to a steel rod for corner; THENCE North 0 degrees 01 minutes 15 seconds East with fence line 363.56 feet to a set steel rod; THENCE. North 55 degrees 31 minutes East 129.5 feet to a set steel rod called to be the Northeast corner of Lot' 3, Block M, Town of -Smithfield, according to w . • Page 2 plat fil-ed in Volume 56, Page 494 D � - 9 , Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, THENCE North 0 degrees 40 minutes es 15 seconds West 69.22 feet to a steel rod in t-he Southerly right-of-way line of Amundson Drive• THENCE North 55 degrees 08 minutes 40 secon ds East with fence al o.ng the Southerly right -•of -way line of Amundson Drive 442.5 feet to • . a steel rod; THENCE South 754.85 feet to the lace of beginning - p g Wing and containing 6.223 acres of land, more or less. This property is located • on the North side of Main t ' ust -West of Glenann Addition. APPpoVED BY THE PLANNING ACID ZONING COMMISSION THIS - 24th DAY OF JANUARY .....�� 1980• CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONIN7GCC. ISSION SECRETARY PLANNING- AND ZONIN COMMISSION • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH'LAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO,.PZ IS HEREBY, REZONED i THIS DAY OF 1 9. MAYOR DICK FARAM CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND •HILLS ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY JE NETTE M ORE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAMD HILLS 1 " Hfp , d' 1 �a:NH .T' o 'i .S'..i .I �. r f r � I s1 . - i I I •. r a , i ,{ +, . rc 9 a � 1) ' ' y 3' ,b ' ' ,f I b , . ,� A , t w (`Sy!�a� ' � " ' ax, 7 T. a ; t "',V,axf j x t I rlf , t K X, ', ,F. J y !' 1y4� �1 t t: ' ,'�' � � { . i 41. It 'd .7 : „ y� .,. I 1 S._ A :> 1 � �Vt e+ 1 � s o 1 � _r - A .,41 �_ Ih,' .i.' it t } �^ y f• r 1-` tF f a . r , 9 V : 1 } _, 11 3ryyi, 4 1 c F c8,I., /t, t R'. „ t tr !i' i�f' Sly .,' j j 3,:� _ Ir i ' ys ,t..; t �..?If ,fite�/ >✓ u 4' 0 .,5 ° 7 4 s 1 '� frj Yy ` '� 1 3 1 I It T f '+ r. f !' . #� y ,I # Ifu i , 4 , r }, 1 ��; r t , ' -4. ? , _ 1 V yy�, i' 1 b f . , 1l . t b � ,Sy R , 'i. ° t .l r1 1 S,`�^ �i,, u j, 1 t '' k.1 i I 1 , i ,, I T i � ,' 59n ft. h 1, I, i" X. ' 1 /.. ! t Jam•' !Y 1,,, c ..,,1 dy , 4 , i, '�6 � " Y kY j r 1,. I1. V� ' R li T 1 L ^ ., !� 4 ,� •, 4 I V �' iT ., [ r ;j t Jy'j.•1 A '' xK.ir. i' 1{ :i ,t`.,'! !J1 4' ,r`' aF x .%, , r'' i . f��{��'1 ' .i j a r ! 'i [ry , r .i;.!% 1 . ,A I K, t. ,F K d'' x * . .. ' 1 , ice,.T , ,,,, ., M .M1 .1' . i . ? i 3r' is f Y 1 J 44 i ,,, =s , 7 _ . , c, < Wit,, �- t' • }Jk ^ R-' 4k, i t 4 I: ^ 1 Y r y1� ( i , [C[ / .. T 1I f 'r 1111 . .. }"a t ' N i , '� � , "' ' G i 1 S . r ''r'' . r � 1 ,lo'/J11`ti l' Ili'' A{,. 1"i •�. 1 a 4. `Y r, ` i t: �' / !,h TrFcl ! 1 Fa ��, y . fi• .. �!,' a > i I I �}�' jj) [ �� I `' , f ..^C! 9 ' *',yRk1 �� 1 fi t i4 2 ,1 1 ',�. t, I ' , . ,I,, , 1;1j° � ' A A'^ a .' .- 9: ` .��, . t} 'I ' 1' w t. 1 r,. a f^I d r r .••1, I �9iP l,� :Rt �i S F f y' f ' �� ?hlift� .k 1 1 + . ►" .+ �� + r, �,' r '_' ' '� �� l +�1 I I q 1 F r j 1 }. ..; fPi5 r i f"? qq-r i a 11 a, 1 ,ram �. Sy i , ; �. ., i� � i 4.. f, F,i' ..:. 5,i t-1{t'.,��].,,p!� f .✓ _ !r .! 3R,,.S 1 1' 1 j +>r, R Iti r7th�- ✓^�' ' 1 0 A rir, j .l tIG' �,, 'pr ii; � dr / �' ` ,, , j � , , � ! R -r 1 J { .,• .., 1't(y+} .g-.i 7`,, 6. 1 T K. -i .c."i .,ti4 j •,\ "_ 1 1 � r a �,I- L r t , .P f j W }i� +� 1 j 3!. b{ ,' F x ,1' a ,'[jt, t j # f/'�I k, P a r L' � '"I ,,,,,,.. w ` f • � ' ` C, f �, 1 .1 f..` i E � , y R C , I; 1 'r`k 11':. �,r ' 0..,< ... ._ ......�. .�.aw.+........_.». _ .. wig...-w...,.f..,w..ry ...+#r..�+�.««ar,t `4'C ( - }. `, 'i f , ...._I { t Pl t TT t,� � i 4 1 ,.: , .'' ' , 1 a ili c � .,_ bi a rI : .l i r i r. 1 i+, F t " ' , F M ti i y El. R v' _ t r� iii c. pp( i f t f . 4. ,, ' n > i 'r is, ,kI , 7t. y Y.f +f' ',�' 1 `'J 1' mod' .1 � `I�l 1 j 4 r •;'tr ,, 7' tel: f} "t i''y ii !i 'i r 1. i '.� 1 'i ''... i' k ',AR 5'' iT'; ,��' `� t st ! •Y x i '° y ' t. 1 t 1 4 4t i.' ,4 'j y }1t' d 1 `T1e • ' ,i �" I'�•'' ! , °' 1., c J. 1 �, � 'r , , °5. I \. } ,' 1'., 1 -1,.t . �' i f it �' r + + k I. �.,! !y r�. v r ! ,1 , r t • f %, e , ,'r i r ' Y h r N i A �._ i +t.' +' 4 . , : 1, 41 _ . i,.. ` r ' r 1 ! 5 ' fr, ' ,�, it ti^t+'h , 1 , +t r I + y t ;, 11 1. j T+.,1. fi t. y f , ! • t !:'' ;: • 1 ` 1 1 j.. t a i t �' ,' j. I f1 1 } fl L. ``1 1 , i_ �1r t.. 1 !' 7 �a� , 1 1 �` f. IL; 1. i ,`i" Y'• l`f' +>0 i1 .r k h T Xt�� r , •x Cx. r i tr. - t� # /A w .... .,.. .,.. ..ra. ww ..r... w,..«. ..-- __ .I..w. — r..-- —►•. ..,...,_a 0w.,.r• .Ir.w..w.A•+k A.Ilri alww.w Mly, .1 w. wI"!wo :f I " , It , ')}.fit? r r j[[J �� , ,.,7.p, 7 r...A_n 0-? e C -1, CJi , 11 ' , �" , * �., wig I 7 x $Y 1 4 [ > y x lu {!` i �_ >... .�... r--- ��41 .+ +,.aw. ..,--► w.►w ,.w-. —'k, .r...... .1.-r.. Jm.w. �r .,.' ,tM•w'•. t.�w1'• r ( 't 4 ' t ° � # x 1 1 z i M1 ' i-t 3 aa r'" ', t� - tP1Ff S�r/�1 A y'•'flq y J rr 7 Fir h+� 3' iy . ,,J\rir 1 I' 'r.. f';' i 7 ..,� I, A i a' ,ic• , ` ;' 'k '�S. ',i ,. 11 [ I I r .' r i i; 1.�'� t Y,-�4t1 t • - i, 1 rj7�` s • e• t a F.. , I ..,. i i :� 3 ✓> '. 1 . i 't i Yr i t . t r.; ,, 1,�o ` w 1`�r , . :K �' ! :'�' i r a' # �. •;r-'. y c� 'Jai, . i t ,�. f 1. I. w � ' - ,4 + . �� 1 :' �' '1 may, ? a y atW,tF:w.ars:r..W.':.,cce ,m W41w 1a -I , ,, .r", i ' y r' `� aW + r^ l..' l.. r,..# / T. /I ia.Q .,u,.i9 .�,�.. •� � :r + ` �5�k 5 4: .,x ,; l � a't"`C'. •' c .. A' ,P 11 F / 1 .• F / - e, yy d `{1 r +1 ..'�. ,,.�Is ,; Ff i 11M',a..`iti * STEE L R0.r.'� . 117 r �• , r r . h / d *,%# �0, 1 � } �� , yM. `� 0, .. ''�� f r.� . �i' * , - #-:..�11 * r. ... • ..... w E'vC. . J . . .. J 1 • • w 0 f+ o f+ . Mc,AK . ....... .'*## ../...,. : ..... ? r, a �. ": t: m*u ' ° S: ti.J `114) � � r:� S 4 .- •� i, ` � �4' t, r �� ,• .� t tt� . r r{'f. Jy � j� 1��tq � / � �j^ f .71 s' » F` . • 1'1.� 1��0�0 '• M,f��. .,�, �A1,+ ?•1; ` ` -Ir tj rl 'C i , tC +� I ' � t 3 ��14 ;ih"� lY V ,.� i f wlrl' , 1 .T1�t,' �� . ^ r , [F'�''�..«.... , .,,�'..r!,t. w.-,+r .ram .+1 ,i/1, ,f� /'� `i., ; ' b h,', ,;FL ,F, I y ,.. ,Hwy �yn�' ar..: k� ,. s rs.,. r.ra MIMM p # A A C .9 -1 ' r\ M 1.2 ccrt,fy thn, ,h`i ivp i s ,true c1r�. correct , ,;,ur �+ �j`,. L j { L F f, IX}i t�pP p f ^ # ti 1 i l tut r 1. r vA , {.+ �,q c'wm �, k �;J� A�- } t' =t VI A�l�ii �y,r-. Jy, i,` s �7fraR`4 ' �� ri' i''';.F1•.Z�-%-;3^.WuQi%Lwr+J6"4v,y_a•.,'DIY.r.:.'---'- .i:1a+.+r••w...wn.w..•.w..�... -,7 -- . — .e..- --s^�- �^"y".1- --1 ,. .::'; i. YpAitY',., !.' >tf:+'%r �- f4 yl,"13 �± ....t .. ,' _* ..:,aR'. ,,l i Ar.lil6 f' . � dt �!f'/'k �. j1 R�B___- • i , . - • L �'. i5a i!.3?r'� l u,.L__: °.:�_>�.._a3.1' s:y..t._ .• _ ti . , '' r , I Y 1 , 1 ..�.._ .,, .,,.... _.: _..+»+.r•....��:..«. v ,......_, ._. - __ .i ,. > -'f .-i. r., -1 .1 _ i , Y.+a-.. x •. _ ir-4v+. ,•...Iwd•...M�,nwF ..,.,►�x.,.>1r.�. w...aS�..a'1',',,j .n.»--- - i _ ._.F..°-,�. _- .. ] . _ rt �i is 0 INFORMATION SHEET FOR PZ 80-2 You are all familiar with this area as Ri'chl and Plaza. Unfortunately the construction of Loop 820 and Northeast and North Hills Mall has effectively killed the area as a retail center. Light manufacturing (electronic assembly)is g being conducted �n the area to the rear of the site. The owner wishes to allow for expansion of this operation and make possible the addition of warehousing and distribution facilities, Failure of the city to allow for expansion of the light industrial operation could result in the loss of the industry to our city, The site as it currently exists has two major problems: (1). Pouch of the area outside of the existing buildings lies in . the flood plain. (2). The traffic flow pattern around the site is not conducive to adding additional manufacturing personnel. The first problem can be deal t wi th by using proper (but expensive) construction techniques. The second problem is soluable, but re- quires the cooperation of state highway agencies. The city may be facing expenditures for traffic signaiization and intersection realignment in the future should this area be zoned as requested. The property is currently platted. You may wish to consider covenants to cover some or all of these future costs as a condition for zoning" Subject to the above comments, I feel the requested zoning is reasonable. • I. I KNOWLTON- ENGLISH- FLOWERSINC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ Fort Worth -Dallas January 9, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-2 We have received the subject zoning case for our review 'and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. Y ICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW A/ 1 j c cc: Mr. Allen Brons tad , Director of Uti 1 i ti es Mr. James Anderson-, Director of Public Works 0 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. - BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 - 817/283-6211 - METRO/267-3367 0- AN ORDINMCE REZONING PROPERTY.IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENt�IENTS, . SECTION 1 OF ORDIidANCE #279, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE.CITY OF NOR7N RYCHiA?tD NTLtS, TEXAS, .. , PASSED. APPROVED' AND ADOPTED - BY THE'PLANNING AND ZflNlNs COMMISSTa1Y AaID THE CITY COIJriCIL OF- -THE CITY OF NORTH. RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13. 1957, AS AMENDED* JANiIARY 27, 1975 AFTER APPR4PRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOI.LtDWiNG. RECUK' IS SUBMITTED i0 THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF NORTH RTCfiLAND BILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING Ct3MMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case Na. PZ 80-2the following descriwproperty shall BC7 rezoned from. ommercia & In:d�is:�;ri�a]:' ' � :,:: ' � � ',�;;� to Industrial ...... SURVEY of 1,833,195.88 sq . ft. or 42.08 - acres of land," more or -less, being a part of COMMERCIAL TRACT . "A" of Richland Plaza Addition to North Richland Hills, and being out of the Mahal ey Lynch Survey, said Plat being of record in Volume 388-22, . Page 77, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas,_ and bei'n9 particularly more described as follows: BEGINNING at a point 2,030 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Mahal ey Lynch -Survey at the intersection of the .Easterly right-of-way 1 i ne . of"Richland Plaza: Drive"with th the Northerly right-of-way. l i ne of "Broadway Avenue"; THENCE North 25 degrees 44 minutes 30 seconds East $0.0 feet to the P. C. of a curve to the left having a central angle of 68 degrees 30 minutes and a radius of 102.0 feet; THENCE with said curve 122.0 feet to a P. R. C. ' which begins a curve to the right having a central angle of 42 degrees 30 minutes and a radius. of 468 ft. • i THENCE 347.2 feet with.said curve to a P. T.• THENCE North'0 degrees 15 minutes 30 seconds West 333.0 feet to the P. C. of a curve to the right having a central angle of 46.degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds and a radius of 150.0 feet; THENCE 122.0 feet wi t-h said curve to a P. T . ; THENCE North 46 degrees 20 minutes East 696.0 feet to the P. C. of a curve to the right having a central angle of 43 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds and a radius of 150.0 feet; . THENCE 114.1 feet with said curve to a P. T . ; THENCE North 89 degrees 55 minutes 30 seconds East 696.52 feet to a corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds East . 9 605.0 feet to a corner, Page 2 THENCE South 70 degrees 48 minutes West 22.43 feet to a corner, • THENCE South 46 degrees 17 minutes West 27.0 feet to a corner; r THENCE South 25 degrees 10 minutes West 364.0 feet to a corner, • THENCE South 62,degrees 40 minutes East 81.0 feet to a. corner � • n the North- westerly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 121• THENCE with said Highway right-of-way line as follows: South 48 degrees 53 minutes West 119.0 4 feet; feet: South 47 degrees 31 minutes West 220. f • South 47 degrees 38 minutes 30 seconds West 46.4 feet: South 47 de grees 46 minutes West 813.3.feet; South 47 degrees 39 minutes 30 seconds West 47 .1 feet; South 47 degrees 31 minutes West 306.8 feet to the intersection with the Northerly Right-of-way line of Broadway Avenue; THENCE South 86 degrees_ 53 minutes West 574.1 feet along said North line of Broadway Avenue to the POINT OF BEGINNING. T-hi s property is located on Grapevine Hwy. and bounded b Richland and P ' y Plaza Drive and Broadway Avenue. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS DAY OF JANUARY 91980. • CHAIRP1AN3 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ,SECRETARY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION_THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 80-2 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF - 51980. ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY, J EANETTE MOORE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY MAYOR DICK FARAM CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 0 I* INFORMATION SHEET FOR PZ 80-3 This request i s in connection with a restaurant specializing in Bar-B- • Q The request i s for on -premise consumption. . Beer is currently being sold on the same lot at Marketbasket for off -- premises consumption. There is no residential close to this location on and I see no reason why the request should not be granted, U KNOWLTON- ENGLISH- FLOWERS, INC. • CONSULTING ENGINEERS /Fort Worth -Dallas January 9. 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-0029 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-3 ' Ne have received the subject zoning case for our review ew and find that we could adequately locate this propertyon the zoning ma - - be passed -by b b g p should o t p y both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Cit _ y Council, RICHARDf. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/1 j c cc.* Mr. Allen Brons tad, Director of Utilities Mr. James Anderson, Director of Public Works 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. - BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 - 817/283-6211 - METRO/267-3367 r. 4W I*' P• u _ ORDINANCEN0. AN:ORDINAVCE REZONING PROPERTYIN ACCORDANCE WITHARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS. - 'SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #1793, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE -CITY -OF NORTH RI'CHt.AtiD itTLLS, TEXAS, . ... .PASSED. APPROVED; AND ADOPTED -BY THE -PLANNING AND ZONING C"TSSION AND THE CITY COtiHCIL OF THE CITY. Of FlURTfI. RICNl.AND MILLS, NOVEMBER 13, . 19671) AS AMEI+I�D JANlIARY , 27, 1975 ASTER APPitOPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HERRING THE FOCLOaiING. RECt Ni�Ai'IOiR IS. Sl18MITTED Td THE. CITY COti�CTt OF TNT CIYY QF NORTH RTCHLA�iD HILLS 6Y THE P1.ANNIN6 AND ZONING CtIWI55I4N: RESOLVED that on Case No. following - .. PZ 80-3 the descried property shal-g: 6E rekdned fram�ocal RPtai l .... :.. � ..... • ..t0 L,cal...Ltail-SDecifi�;.�5e:Lal'p- A].. . nl BEING a lot, tract or parcel of land out of Block 29Richfield Place Commercial Addition, to the City of -North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-32, Page 44, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, .and described by metes and bounds as follows; 'BEGINNING at an iron pin 38.7 feet South 67 degrees 45 minutes East -and 14.5 feet North-22 degrees 15 minutes East from the Southwest corner of said Block 2; THENCE North 22 degrees 15 minutes East 60.0 feet; THENCE South 67 degrees 45 minutes East 25.5 feet; • THENCE South 22 degrees 15 minutes West 60.0 feet; THENCE North 67.degrees 45 minutes West 25.5 feet to the point of beginning. _ Thi s property i s located - i n the ._ No rr i c hSho-QQ.ing. Hwy. APPROVED BY THE PLANNI NG AND . ZON I NO COMMISSION THIS 2 4 t h DAY 0P JANUAR _ - - $198Q, CHA I IMN PLANNING AND ZONING C"I SS I ON SE.CRETARY PLANNING ND ZON COMMISSION • BE IT.ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ' OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLSACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO..PZ IS HERESY REZONED .. THIS DAY O _..:. , 19790 MAYOR DICK EARAM CITY QF FORTH RICHL'AND- HILLS ATTEST; C SECRETARY JEANETTE MOOR CITY OF FORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY CITY of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BEING a lot, tract or parcel of land out of Block 2, RICHFZELD PLACE CONIMERCTAL ADDITION,to the city of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County Texas according to plat recorded in Volume 388em32, Page 44, plat records Tarrant County, Texas and described by metes and bounds as (allows; BEGINNING at an iron pin 38.7 feet South 67 degrees-45 minutes East and 14.5 feet North 22 degrees-15 minutes East from the Southwest corner of said Block 2; THENCE North 22 degrees-15 minutes East, 60.E feet; THENCE South 67 degrees,45 minutes East, 25.5 feet; THENCE South 22 degrees-15 minutes West, 60*0 feet; THENCE North 67 degrees-45 minutes West, 25.5 feet to the point of beginning. r scale. OF WENDELL. HANC�JCK • •.• • IRON PINS yr' .4S *: •:* registered public surveyor no. 1326 .X%X ._•.....__. FENCE ;;� 834-6243 0Ko�cz.i. �cocK _.N._._..__. da1S D ARC STAKES ......................... _ T E UTILITY LINE 1324 1721 HALTOM ROAD .___�._... '• � • •' -S-S ...-,.__....-- SANITARY SEWER B'' •�• •, a •'y FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117 Su N e 10 City of X�kcrth Richland Hills, Texas DATE: February 20, 1980 TO: Thomas Paul City Manager FROM: Allen Bronstad Director of Utilities SUBJECT: 2.0 Million Gallon Elevated Storage Tank Estimate No. 6 in the amount of $27,157.95 is now due and payable to Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc,, This amount is to be paid from Bond Monies, ME (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH R ICHLAN D H I LLSI TEXAS 76118 P OF _ _ .. _ .. FILE F3531 --{-6-_--_------------- "T Ir-"ATF NO*— SIX UCH ^�v3--53 i--------------- ---- _--------- R J J E C T D E S'' R I PT ION— -- .-•---- 2.OMM�� �LEVATED tgjATER STORAGE TANK - - ------- -- --- - ------ -- NORTH R I CHICAN D- HILL-S-__--__-__-----P �� ILLS DATE-- LACE— N'0�'TM R-I CHLAND H ----- .- r 2/ 7/8,� I�v'E CHARGED- THRU PERIOD 364 DAYS---Cc,lTi�ACToR- T ,K & IRON AORKS UNI'�ER''AL A�� _ _-;, ___._-------�_C. _-_ , IN njR MATFR I ALS FURNISHED A^ID LABOR PE1RF0R7v'ED IN PERIOD E!`JD I NG— 8� / / 1 31 — - ,).�K - ORDER -DATE— ~ 21 2-/ 79 ____----- CALENDAR DAYS- -__._4 _------------ A---- - - ---- -----=---- 20- COMPLETION DATE— -- - -- 3/28%8 ; PREVIOUS THTS %• _I TE +DESCR I PT I OP•, _ UNIT •m d� 4-ram. � _ - �� �� _ �� i� am sr mom _ �. �� u�► �� �. -r _ �.. _ r �. EST I NIA? E ESTIMATE TOTAL PRI Cc _ r r �.+ �. �. � r � r �� _ r r �� _ -r ��-_ r _ .�� .�� �� _ r �� _ _. "At OUNT _A _ .....- +r r .� �r� r _ r� TA . CC�IC. FGUNCA T ION _ L-• S • --------- ---i .~0000 1900 44000 o OO u� __ __--- ---- --- ----- -•- -- -- - - --. - -- --- - --- - - -0 0—i - 44 ��30 I.5• -'--YAK' PI°INi` __------ --------------- 0-.00-------C.00 12800*00 0.00 - --- 3. DFL IVERY TANK CC����PC� . TO .JOB L.S. --__._._0a00 _ 1 • O0 b0b6 f 5594UU.00_ 5594_G J 4• ERECTION OF TANK L . S • +CIF 0.70 0.15 0.8 201170 s 00 170994.50 �. PAINTING TANK L.S. 0.30 0 16 u 0 000049UQ- e�W , � • ELECTRICAL ,CORK0000- `---- - - -- --- -1 � ----------.------------..-- S'-----.- ` 0U .0 0 4G 6 U . O J 0.0:� --�--' 7. TELEMETER ING L.S. --0-. ---:--- - ---- -_ - U.�J� �.+CU �.UO 3Ubv.� _ _ 9 . FENCING Ls 0.000�JO OO0 6540 . UU ____ _______________�_____-____________________-___ o-00________-_________________-_________�_______ , IELD VERIFICATION F I CATION OF JOB CONDITIONS ►4D C 0 iNIFIRMATION OF AY QUANT I I ES _ �--- Y_------ SF� ��A F -- D - -_- ---- -- -----_---------___ � C � --- ----------------------------- _--- - --------------- --- --- - ---,-- (OWNER ' S PROJECT REP,QESE�'�TAT IVE j-------------------------------___--_------- --------_------- _._--------._ ATE— ,.1q rrrAr_r wwr�w.r �wr+�__rwr �r�r rr __ _..r_ W mr_. PPRC3VEp.:,-_--------------._----.-------------------------TOTAL mm_ mm -----------------------------------__-_-_-------- • • --------_.� 774394 # 5C 1''O`:z►LTON—EINGL ISH—FLOWERS , INC. LESS 10 PERCENT RETAINED 77439.4_5 CONSULTItiG ENGINEERS -- -.-�- _ -.._- -- DIFFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . PLUS 75 PERCENT MATLS ON HAND. q.-" b �955 a 0., 0 0 TOTAL . . 696955.0 _____�_____-- ______�._____.. TE- 7 4) 19 �Q LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS DIFFERENCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE MATE 6697'97 1C 27157 = .91 _..____ __�_ ______ ____ - NOTE —PAY LAST AMOUNT SHOWN TOTAL EARNINGS - (I*NCL. RETAIN.) —$ 774394 .50 TOTAL 3 I D—$ 880030 .00 P - TI'"c C�-!ARCirD T U - - ---------------- ----- �. HR THIS PER I OD-- 362 --------- --------- _--_- ------ -----ERCthT—_-_87.95 CAMS TOTAL T I4E= 420 DA'?S PERCENT-- 8'6.6E .1 I'IVOIC: F. - - AREA CODE 317 PHONE • N YJ&"K. .f IRON WOR-K 11221 WEST ROCKVIL' E ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 4.62 � 31 AREA COOS 317 � PHON -'�J,JTj- ACT ���, ���. A& D"L b-!-STOMER ORDERNO. -- i- REQUISITION NO. DATE TO SHIP _ I - SOLD BY INVOICE DAiE ; INVOICE NO, i 470B # 6 6 6 7 , TE R MS 1-31-80 6 PER CONTRACT AGREFMENT - - CITY Y OF S� � NOR -RIC11LAND HILLS.. TEXAS _.., S O - %I(NOWT,�'ON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, .INC. H f' 550 1ST STATE BA.'V1: BUILDING I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS BEDF•ORD ,. TEXAS 76021 P T- :-- O T �- O L _ QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PERCENTR TION COMPLETE PRICE AMOUNT COMPLETED TO DATE ITEM #1 IN��TALI,1ITION OF CONCRETE _ - - FOUNDA T ION 100 44r000.00 44 ,000.00 I TEX # G a YARD P IP1•i r . 12 8 00.0 D , _ ITEM #3 DELIVERY OV FABRICATED TANK COMPOIJENTS TO JOB SrTE 100 559,400.00 559 4 00.00 ITEM # 4 ERECT ION OF TANK 85 201F170.00 170 '994 50 ITEM # 5 PA rNTI NG OF TANK 49,000.00 ITEM # u ELECTR1(•fAL WORK 4, 060. o0 ITEM # 7 .____ TELEMET ER I NG . 7 C7 b o. 0 0 ITEM #8 FENCING 6. 540.00 TOTAL, Ct )jV1'1,ETF.D TO DATE 774,394*50 LF. SS: 10 c; RF.TAINA(.' : 77,439w45 - payments 669, 797..10 - TOTA L DF. D1j(.1 T r( :r 747, 236. 55 - TOTAL D F THIS EST'EMATE 27,157.95 We hereby certify that the goodVovetted y this invoice were produced ill compliance with all applicable requirements of the Fair Latjor Standards Act as amended includinq Sections 6, 7, anti 12 therPvf n - of the United States Departme3nt of Labor i%SLtad under Sectin,, 14 thereof. • a d of the reQul�iions and orders 1-16 U City of rth Richland.HiUs Texasc "k- ilk ' r Memo to: Thomas Paul City Manager From: Stan Gertz Fire Chief Date: February 20, 1980 Subject: Construction change and payment on fire station #3 I recommend full payment of attached invoice for the amount of one thousand five (_$1,005.) dollars to walker Construction Company due to this change order in #1l floor drains to be enlarged, one hundred twenty five (_$125.) dollars, #2 additional required changes in driveway change to meet state highway requirements, one thousand three hundred and eighty ($1,380.) dollars, #3 changing of metal chair steel rod supports to plastic chairs, (this change g saved five hundred ($500.) dollars in cost of. construction,) Total cost of project $4583,000.00 Less partial payment (-Dec. 5, 19 79) 69 , 30_0, 00 Unpaid balance 388,700.00 • Unpaid balance $388,700.00 Plus change order required 19005.00 New unpaid balance ' $ 389.9705.00 Revenue shares set aside for project $291,082,.02 Less partial payment 69,300.00 Revenue shares left for project $ 221, 782 .02 New unpaid balance $ 389,705.02 Less revenue shares left for project 221,782,02 Amount unbudget ed for project $1679922.98 Yo "rs t;Xuly, ,Stan Gertz Fire Chief. (817) 281-0041 / 4101 MORGAN CIRCLE / P. 0. BOX 13305 ,t NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 III* 0 tarry w.dixson .architect * aia - February, Mck Faram :!!ayor City of North Richland Hijis P. 0. Box 186,",g North Ellichland Hills, Te,,,ras 76118 Fe: Central Fii-e Station City Of North Fichland 11.1*11s North Fichland 14-ji1s, Texas, Dear Please find hereT,'T-4-1rj tWo (9� ' Co YdeofAIA oc,jent G713Construc-ionChangnAmthorilation, in the amount of $1,005,00, issued for -',")aymen-t ors the abur,,re referenced -oroject, recommend that -oayment be 'invade as re�!uested, If aK--vL-ee-d m- on by your office -,,31-eas-P. si�-�n tl.q-p 9 -.riat,"'A Ls-nace and return one one co-Dy to my office e for further h n r.1 I i n Yours truiy, .1-jayrury ' 7 Dzvs onA.I.A., LTYVD/ld 7001 Grapevine Highway, Suite 408, Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Telephone 1/817/589-0621 is CON-STRUCT10,N CHANGE 0-vvner AUTHORIZATION Architet`; i.: I Consultant Contractor [j Field ❑ AIA DOCUMENT G713 ("instructions on reverse side) Other ❑ PROJECT: Central Fire Station CONSTRUCTION CHANGE (name, address) 5328 Davis Blvd. AUTHORIZATION NO: 1 0�-%INER: City of North Richland Hills DATE OF ISSUANCE: 1-30-80 TO: ARCHITECTLazes W• Dixson, AIA Walker Construction Co. 7001 Grapevine Highway, Suite 408: (Contractor) 4028 Dale Street Y Ft. Worth, Texas 76118 Ft, Worth, Texas 76118 CONTRACT FOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: r - $458, Oob.00 In order to expedite the Work and avoid or minimize delays in the Work which may affect Contract Sum or Contract Time, the Contract Documents are hereby amended as described below-. Proceed with this Work promptly. Submii final costs for Work involved and change in Contract Time (if any), for inclusion in a subs-equent Change Order. Description: - 1. Add 2" Floor Drain + 125.00 2. Add Drainage Work to approaches +11380.00 3. Change steel supports to -slab — 500.00 Total Sum +11005,00 Attachments: (Here insert listing of documents that support description.) The following is based on information provided by the Contractor: Method of Determining Change in the Contract Sum: (lump sum, unit prices, cost plus fee or other) 0 Fixed ❑ Fixed Estimated Change in Contract Sum Estimated Change in Contract Time ❑ of $ 1,005,00 ❑ s mated of None ❑ Maximum ❑ Maximum days ISSU AUTHORIZED: CONFIRMED: �) B Y _ BY Arc it Owner Date Contractor Date AIA DOCUMENT G713 CONSTRUCTION CHANGE AUTHORIZATION MARCH 1979 EDITION AIA19 C'1979 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W'., W'ASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G713 1979 r, u r 1 t 1 CokrSTR- UCTI O'� r1J " Ci A' TH O RN ZATI O N G:'73 ( Instruction$ on reverse side) PROJECT: Central Fire Station may, e, a6dress;, 5328 Davis Blvd. O ``V N r R . City of North Richland Hills TO: Walker Construction tCo Contractor) 4028 Daley Street • Ft. Worth, Texas 76118 CONTRACT FOR: $458,000.00 C'n�,r _ � rC"It��� ' ❑ _ CL�^_ �u!tarlt Contractor Ell Field ❑ ,r Omer CONS T RUCTION CHANGE AUTHORIZATiON NO: 1 D'.Tr OF iSS� A��CE: 1-30-80 r� i. C ► ; i T E CT : Larry W. Dixson, AIA 7001 Grapevine Highway, Suite 408 Ft. Worth, Texas 76118 ARCHI T cCT'S PRO}ECT NO: In order to expedite the klVork and avoid or minimize delays in the %York which may affect Contract Sum or Contract Tlme, the COntract Documents are hereb}- arnend2�^ as described belo�f. Proceed with this � � t i tr �j f�-�^ r rl ' � f I � T• r ' �%`Oj k prornptl}. Submit final costs for v or'K inv Glived and change in Cc^tract I ime �ii any), for inclusion in. a subsequent Change Order. Description: 1• Add 2" Floor Drain + 125.00 2. Add Drainage work to approaches +11380.00 3. Change steel supports to slab — 500.00 Total Sun +l r 005 , 00 Attachments: Here.i,-);ert ;,sting o dorume-t� the; sJr'perr cP:�rir7(i� The following is based on information pro�Iided by the Contractor: Method of Determining Change in the Contract Sum: Oump sum, unit prices, cost p!us fee or other) KI Fixed ❑ Fixed Change in Contract Sum Change in Contract Time ❑ Estimated of . 1,005.00 ❑Estimated of None ❑ Maximum ❑ Maximum days ISSUED: rc AUTHORIZED: �B Y I---- Ovvner CONFIRMED: -BY - Date Contractor Da to v AIA DOCUMENT G773 CONSTRUCTION CHANCE AUTHORIZATION • MARCH 199 EDITION AIAI& C19.79 • THE AP% ERICAN 1N5TITUTE of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YOnK AVE., N.1'1., WASH,INGTON, D.C. 20006 G713 1979 0 city of xicrthRichlar��d dills, texas D4Tt: February 9, 1980 T0: Finance Director City Manager FROM: Jim Anderson Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Reimbursement for Street Signs 1. Since the start of this fiscal year our traffic control division has installed the following street signs in the listed subdivisions. The funds for these signs were collected in the previous FY at the rate of $45 per intersection, but no income account was set up. Meadow Lakes ------------ g Richland Terrace --- --- 8 Irish Meadows---- ----17 Londonderry-�------------ 5 Kingswood Estates-------- 5 Hol i day North, Sect. Iv-- 4 North Park Estates ------- 12 Holiday !.'est.. Sect . 2-- --14 valley Park Estates ------ Total 78 @ -�45 = �3510 2. I request reimbursement from the general fund in the amount of $3510 subject to council approval., 3. Since street signs in fact represent a capital expenditure that is too small to justify pro rata type bookkeeping and is subject to market conditions, I propose the fol 1 owi ng procedure: (a) Collect all signing monies into the genera 1 fund. (b) Bill the general fund for all initial installation of street signs. (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. 0. BOX 133053 / FORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 06 F. td February 18, 1980 Mr. lames R. Anderson Public works Director City of North Richland Hills P. 0. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Mr. Anderson: This letter will serve as our ro o p p salto prepare plans, specifications, cost estimates and contract. documents for the installation of traffic signals at three i r g intersections in Not th Richland Hills, Texas. If accepted by the City, this letter proposal will serve as an Agreement between the City of North Richland Hills and PA W A, Incorporated, for professional traffic engineering services in connection with the preparation of plans, Specifications, cost estimates, and contract documents. PAwA proposes to accomplish the following ng work in connection with this proposed} project. P .1. Prepare detailed design and construction fans f - .the intersections of Emerald Hills way - Davis Boulevard (FM 1938)� Grape vineHighway (Spur 452 - SH 121) - Harwood, and Grapevine Highway - Entrance Hills Mall at Edison. 8 Y to North 2• Collect, review, and use where appropriate Stat rtatio e Department of Highways and Public Transportation n standard specifications for signal equipment and the installation allation 3. Prepare phasing and timingplans for the operation P � P anon of the three intersections. 4. Using standard City of North Richland Hills contract documents and standard specifications for equipment and work, re are th for constructs P P e contract documents for advertising on of the traffic signals at the three intersections. 5• Furnish 15 copies of the plans, specifications, bidding and construction.P s, and contract documents for use in g 6. Assist the City in the evaluation of bids i eceived and recommendations on the award of a contract. As proposed, the Cityof North Richland � . chland Hills ,will furnish the following items to PAwA. 1 • Base maps or aerial photogra hs from which construction ' P on plans can be developed, 7540 LBJ Freeway Park Central, Suite 707 Dallas, Texas 75251 (214) 661-9406 Mr. James R. Anderson • Page 2 February 18, 1980 2. Underground utility information. PAwA, .Incor prated P , proposes to provide the professional en ineerin Q a abl g g services outlined herein for a lump sum fee of $6 lOe of the work pay percentage eat monthly intervals based on the estimated g k comple a ur ni g the month. It is estimated can be completed in three. months that the total project allowing six weeks for the bidding process. If the City of North Richland Hills wa nts to employ PAWA, Incorporated,. Burin construction of the traffic signals, we propose to r g engineeringservices on P po provide these additional professional a reimbursable fee basis in accordance with t Rates Schedule. he attached Standard Thank you for your consideration of our fir rn on this project. If our proposal is acceptable to the City of North Richland Hills, lease sign b P P g both copses of this letter and return one copy for our files, We look forward to working with you and the ' Hills, Y City of North Richland Sincerely, PAwA, Incorporated 40 1` qac Hate h ell, P.E. Vice President . JH:vlp Attachment Accepted by City of North Richland Hills: Name and Title . Date u U STANDARD RATES SCHEDULE Schedule of Fees V The classifications listed below are representative of • The direct salaryp those to be used in this PROJECT, for employees shall be within the following- listed salary . a y rangy es. Principal Principal Eno ineer Project Engineer Engineering Analyst Engineering Technician Senior Draf tsman Draftsman Secretary Clerical $18-00 - $23.00/hr. 15.00 - 19.00/hr. 12.00 - 17.00/hr. 8.00 - 12.00/hr. 5.00 - 9.00/hr. 5.00 - 8.00/hr. ,3.00 - 6.00/hr. 4,00 - 8.00/hr. 3.00 - 4.50/hr. Payroll cost to be billed shall bee a �- . equal to direct salaries of the employees plus thin (30%)percent for fringe b�enefits (Social Secrrr'�` '' Y � �y contribution, payroll taxes, etc.). Sala v Costs Payroll costs ti ryes a multiplier of 2.3 is used to comp ute the fee charged for employees salaries, overhaad, and profit. Direct Non-SalaEy Ex enses Reimbursable direct non -salary expense's are • . �billed at actual invoice cost plus a ten (10%) percent service charge for handlina. Any subcontract worn shall be charmed o at actual cost of work plus a ten (10%) �rezn't Service charge for handling. P Terms of Payment Payment shalt be made o on monthly u receipt P p fan invoke outlinrna the amount of hours worked by each employee and the employee's salary rate along with itemiz ed charges forany direct non -salary expenses. • (PAWA, Incorporated, 1-80) X: N �Mvnnder IL February 19, 1980 Ms. Jeanette Moore, City Secretary Municipal Complex 7301 N. E. Loop 820 P. 0. Box 13395 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Insurance Bid Comprehensive General/Automobile Liability Hartford Casualty Insurance Company Policy No. 46PNC641947 Dear Ms. Moore: We are pleased to submit the enclosed remium of the Ci t ' s C P quotation for renewal y Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability Coverage. i Also enclosed s our binder with the 9 Hartford Casualty Insurance Company effective February 24, 1980. It is my understanding that the Council will meet on February 25, 1980 and the bid will be awarded to the successful bidder at this meeting. Therefore, it was necessary that we issue a binder extending your coverage past the normal e date of February 24, 1980. expiration The Hartford Company Underwriter insisted on applying damage deductible pp y1n9 a $250 property g e uctible per claim to Code 49521, which is Sewers -Storm Sanitary. This is due to the increased rm or number of claims caused by sewer back-up in private residences during the past couple P p e of years. We were unable to obtain a quote from them without this deductible. The $250 property damage deductible per claim will 11 only apply to sewer related claims and does not apply to the water works automobile liability quotation. or the . Our premium quotation is based on a twelve-month ' t policy term and includes both Personal Injury Liability with Excl us i orl "C" C deleted and Products Liability overage on water sales. These coverages are included under your current policy. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this renewal�- quotation on and would be happy to supply any additional i nfurma ti on . Very ru l y yours, V. Roy filler cp far'. a" a 1MANAGER 14 GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE LIMITS PREMIUM Bodily Injury $300,00o ProPerty Damage $25 00' 0 $362315 A Personal Injury (Groupswith A. B ' & C 63210 Exc Exclusion �� C�� deleted Total 5 , 945 Less Premium Discount $48,9470 Net Premium 85385 Less Estimated Dividend $405085 Estimated Net Premium 4,430 Incl Includes Products Coverage on Water Sales -$35,655 The State Board of Insurance has ' applyto the s advised that an e renewal 22% debit will •coverage. estimated Net Premium, This is included uded ' �n the above AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COVERAGE LIMITS Bodily Injury $100,000/3009000 PREMIUM $ 52293 Property Damage $ 2500 0 Uninsured Motorists ' 32270 Bodily Injury Property Damage 10,0001209000 . 365 Total $ 5 000 ' 146 Less P Premium Discount $ 92074 Net Premium 572 Less Estimated Dividend $ $,'Q2 Estimated NetPremium 1,057 Includes Non -owned and Hired Automobile ' Li abi 1 � ty $ 7,445 Coverage. The Automobile Experience Modifier• Credit of 39% has been all in the abo above premium quotation. owed TOTAL GENERAL LIABILITY AND AUTOMOBILE OMOBILE ESTIMATED NET$433100 .7� - —zdr at. 7 "tic blnr'��r A T ww J •4 y W 41 k t AND ADDRESS 13F AGEiNCY W I'lli ?A JN Y 7 ALEXANDER & ALEXANDER OF TEXAS, INC., 'HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. fr. Effective 12: 01 am February 24 P. 0. Box 2950 1980 9 X)U xA 9 k XM x x)U k,5�,Ax u n tj I FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76101 PolI %y - issuance X1 This binder Is issued to extend coverage in the above named*' (817) 737-4000 company por expiring policy # 46 PNOQ �ejl 47 ed§ 9 (except a5p-,,u, icw, NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF INSURED Description of Operation/Vehicles/Prope rty City of North Richland Hills 0. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Tx 76118 Type and Location of Property P R 0 P E R T y Type of Insurance L 1 0 Scheduled Form (2 Comprehensive Form 91 Premiss/Operations 2 Products/Completed Operations L 0 Contractual 1 0 Other (specify below) T y 13 M ed. Pay. $ Per $ Per L5�F'J,,, 1Acciii;-nt Personal Injury Exc usion "C" De eted A U 0 Liability Y, Non -owned T EJ - Comprehensive -Deductible 0 0 CoHision-Deductible M 0 Medical Payments 0 ® Uninsured Motorist 1 0 No Fault (specify): L 0 Other (specify): E [Z H11-ed $--105000/202000/52000 Co,tieraze/ Perils/ Form s cckx I Amt of Insurance I Dad. [ % Covarage/Forms A E B 91 C 0 WORKERS' COMPENSATION — Statutory Limits (specify stares beloN) Limit's of Liabiltit Each Occurrence Bodily Injury $ 3005000. Property Damage $ 25 5000. Bodily Injury & Property Damage — Combinlz_d Aggregate 3005000. 25,000. Personal Injury $ 300 5000. tv J, Limits of Li_-Ibility, Bodily Injury (Each Person; $ 1005000. Bodily Injury (Each Accident) 130050001 JProperty $ e 25,000Damage i 40 . Bodily Injury & Property Damage Combined $ 0 EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY — Limit $ 'A SPECIAL CONDITIONVOTHER COVERAGES *A $250.00,per claim deductible will a ply to the property damage of p Code 49521, Sewers -Storm or Sanitary NAME AND ADDRESS 0' 0 M C- I ' OSS PAYEE 0 ADD INN r ORTGAGEE SURED LOAN NUMBER 100000� V Roy Mil r 2 -19-80 SlgflatLire. of Authorized Representative Date ACORD 75 (11-77) 11: AtO' 0 f 3 • ._ .... ..,•tiw w�.w� y-ft-.4r._.Mwn.n4ld►M1M.R�AM�W\ . � ��➢iAF+*�ri��,:AMM T\�+r.F4 u I* Q '19 C: 7-1 0 ORDINANCE No.. APB ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 336, CHAPTER IV, PARAGRAPH D NOW5 THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: I Chapter IV, Paragraph D, of Ordinance 336, The Gas Code, shall be amended to read as follows: (d) This Ordinance shall apply to all piping, fixtures, fittings or appliances installed, constructed, erected, altered, or added to or built upon and within the boundaries f the .� p s o e City ty i f same be connected to either the City water or sewerage systems, except those for which permits have already been issued by the Building Official prior to the passage of this Ordinance. This Ordinance is not meant to apply to that work done by the proper employees of the City or other companies furnishing water in the laying of water mains and services and City sewer mains and services, or to the installation of gas distributing mains and services in the streets and alleys by employees of the gas distributing company, or any work performed by such gas distributing company on any piping or connection up to and including the outlet connections of the service meter. Nothing in this Code shall be construed as prohibiting an individual from negotiating with the gas company for the repairs, replacements, or installation of yard or service lines (that line carrying the unmeasured gas) on his premises or as requiring a license or bond from gas company. Such work shall be performed by qualified employees of the gas company in accordance with all State and Federal regulations. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Rex McEntire, City Attorney Mayor Dick Faram ,1930. 0 0 Nir 0 R t ORDINANCE NOW AN ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, WHICH ADOPTS THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE (1979 EDITION) AS THE MECHANICAL CODE OF THIS CITY; PROVIDING FOR RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING MECHANICAL SYSTEMS WITHIN THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR A FINE NOT IN EXCESS OF $200000 FOR VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; ENACTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND STATING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1980, APPROVED: ATTEST: City Secretary-, .Jeanette Moore 0 Mayor Dick Faram A n U ORDINAI CE LT 0. TEXBE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, AS, THAT: ARTICLE 1 MECHANICAL CODE SECTION 1.01 Adoption. The Uniform Mechanical Code, 1979 as adopted b t • Conference of BuildingOfficials P y he International herebyad � a copy of which is attached hereto is opted and designated as the Mechanical Code of the Richland Hills, Texas, the same as thoughCity of North such code were copied at length herein except that additional Sections 1.02 1 � .03, 1.04, 1.05, 1.06, & 1.079 herein contained are add ed, Section 102 A, B, & C and Sections 306 Table 3-A of Chapter 3 are deleted; each of said Sections c ions shall hereafter read as follows 1.02 Uncovering of Work. If a mechanical system or part thereof is c • inspected, tested, and approved covered before being PP as prescribed in this chapter, it shall be uncovered upon the direction of the Building Official 1.03 violations and Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation or agent who shall 1 therewith violate a provision of this code or fail to comply y th or with any of the provisions thereof or violate a detailed statement or plans submitted and approved thereunder ..shall be guilty of a misdemeanor* Each such person shall be deemed guilt of a separate offense for each and ever day or y which any violation y y portion thereof during of any of the provisions of this code is committed continued, and upon conviction in the Court d or of Jurisdiction for any such violation such person shall be punished b fine y a of not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00). Each day the condition exists constitutes separate violation, nstitutes a 1.04 Requirements Not Covered By Code. Any requirement necessary for the safet strength • existingor y� gth or stability of an proposed mechanical installation, or for the safetyof occupants of a building or structure t s the shall be determined b ' nospecifically covered by this code, y the Building Official. 1.45 Restriction On Employees. No officer or employee connected with the department financially interested in the furnishingP nt shall be of labor, material, or appliances for the construction, alteration, or maintenanc e of Mechanical installations or in the making of plans or of specifications therefore. 1.Ob Liability. Any off icer or employee, or member of any Board, charged with the enforcement of this code, acting for the local governing body in the discharge g of his duties, shall not thereby render himself liable personally and he is hereby relieved from all personal liability for any damage that may occur to persons or property as a result of any act required or permitted in the discharge of his duties. Any suit brought against any officer or employee because of such act performed by him in the enforcement of any provision of this code shall be defended by the City Attorney until the final termination of the proceedings. 1.07 Mechanical Contractor's Bond. It shall be the duty of every contractor who shall make contracts for the erection or construction or repair of Mechanical Systems for which a permit is required, and every Mechanical Contractor making such contracts and subletting the same, or any part thereof, to give good and suff icient bond in the sum of Three Thousand Dallars ($3,000.00). The bond under the provisions of this Section shall be executed by the Mechanical Contractor as Principal and by a corporate surety duly authorized to do business under the laws of the State of Texas. Such bond shall be on substantially the same form as that shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. 0 EXHIBIT A: Bond Number CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING BOND STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT I KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE, as principal and _ , a corporation duly licensed to To business in the State of Texas, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, in the penal sum of Three Thousand ($3,000.00) Dollars, good and lawful money of the United States of America, will and truly be paid in North Richland Hills, Texas and for payment of which we and each of us hereby bind ourselves, and our heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The Conditions of this obligation are such that: WHERE-kS, the above bounden principal herein desires to install, alter or repair, heating syst ars, air conditioning systems, in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas and sh=_11 obtain a permit as specified in the Mechanical Code of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, dealing with permit fees, from the Building Official of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, or his authorized representative, prior to making each installation, alteration or repair; and Conditioned further, that this bond shall be for the use and benefit of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas and for the use and benefit of any person having a cause of action arising out of the installation, alteration or repair of any heating system, air conditioning system, by reason of failure to comply with the Mechanical Code of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, by said Principal or any of his employees, agents or sub -contractors. Successive action may be brought on this bond for successive breaches of it's conditions or any of them, provided, however, that the sum total of all liability of the Surety in any one or all of such actions shall not exceed the sum of Three Thousand ($3,000.00) Dollars. Now, therefore, if the said principal, shall complete such installations, alterations, or repairs shall thereafter at all times comply with the ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, governing such installations, altera- tions, or repairs, now in effect and as hereafter adopted in said City, and all the laws of the State of Texas which regulate the same, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, to remain in full force and effect. The liability of the Surety under this bond, if not cancelled as herein- after provided, shall cease and terminate of it's force and effect one (I) year from date of issuance, —saving an excepting for expenses, losses, claims for a am ges, judgements, or other costs which may arise or be incurred or sustained by any citizen of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas against the principal by reason of failure to comply with the provisioner of the Mechanical Code of said city. The word "repair" or "repairs" as herein used shall be deemed to refer exclusively to the repair of any water heater, air conditioning systems or appliance; the replacement of any heat exchanger, or air conditioning system or appliance; the dismounting and reassembling of any vented gas, oil or coal fired heating equipment, or any air conditioning system equipment, or of any appliance; and shall relate to no other repair- of any kind or character. This obligation may be cancelled by said surety by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to said City of it's intention so to do, and the Surety shall be relieved of any further liability under this bond thirty (30) days from receipt of said notice by said Cite. I` TECTIMONY THEREOF, Wicness our heads at__ Texas this day of , lg YKINUIrAL ATTORNEY -IN -FALL CHAPTER 3 OF UNIFORM MECHANTCAL CODE Section 306 Table No. 3-A of such code is hereby omitted and deleted in its entirety. Such table is amended to read: 1. A Mechanical permit is not required on new construction when a building permit is required. A validation form must be signed after the building permit has been issued. All other work will require a permit. 2. Heating & Air Conditioning Fees for One Trade Only: MONETARY VALUE OF BASE + PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED WORK ESTIMATED COST 0 - 500 501 - 1,500 1,501 - 3,000 3,001 - 5,000 5,001 - 50,000 50,001 - 100,000 100,001 - 500,000 500,001 or more 3. Other Inspections and Fees $ 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 0.00 + .005 50.00 + .004 150.00 + .003 650.00 + .002 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours.............$15.00 Per Hour (minimum charge--- two hours) 2. Reinspection fee assessed under provisions of Section 305(F)..........................................$15.00 Per Hour 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated ........................................... ..... $15.00 Per Hour 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans...........................$15.00 Per Hour (minimum charge ---one-half hour) Section 102; A. The City may enforce this ordinance in any manner set out within the code itself, by fine and forfeiture as set out in the preceeding section, by revoking permits or bonds, by ordering construction to cease, by withdrawing utility privilege or by civil suit, either at law or in equity. B. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication is provided by law. C. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is held to be invalid for any reason, by a court of competent jurisdiction, then the council expressly finds that it would not have passed and approved such invalid portion, and such invalid portion shall not affect the remaining valid portion of this ordinance. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Rex McEntire, City Attorney 1980 Mayor rc aram Q Q��- To see Maps �,�,ith A end PIease contact cty a: Secretary 'sOffice / NIuni�lpa1 Records