Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1980-06-09 Agendas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA For the Meeting June 9, 1980 , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN W ounci 6:30 p.m. -17 - Discussion on letter from Bent Nail Developers, Inc„ on Rufe Snow Drive pp 2. Discussion on tractor and rotary mower rldp,Q/tt�W for Utility Department I 3, Discussion on purchasing new animal /T77.41.71WIll/1J7n.:�.'fi.' an 1 control vehicle Mal , 4-4al iLS\Zr..ii4• 4, -Discussion of title chan.e and salar adiustment Council 7:30 — 1 Call to order _ 2. Roll Call �� -- r r a r ii..1C r., 3_ Invocation IL . ' - HMI kll=4 Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meetin�Y liWil y May 12, 1980 L, t— ii 5. Approval of Minutes of the Special Meetin t,) - -"- May 22, 1980 6. Public Hearing - Appeal Hearing for (Jamie's Restaurar PZ 80-15, Request of Colte Investments __$� __���� Ltd. , from Commercial to Commercial- Ili Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages lai8!2/40,1 aill/4LTAlif 7. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 80-15 („aar S „ ' 8. Public Hearing - pZ 80-16, Request of Antonio's Pizza City from Local Retail to I - J_ •4i7tsAI(T�;. Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcohol c 1 Beverages 9. Consideration of Ordinance for PZ 80-16 P. 7 - 4'- 1 10. PS 80-14, Request of Bank of North Texas a !-��_.-_ ■ for final plat of Lot 2, Block 2, Carder ,' 7� //1f TV Addition hr.. _ IT Bu alders Inc. , for of e at Brown Custom ^Y BuilderyInc. , for replat of Lots 38R F(J`/fr and 39R, Block 3, Meadow Lakes Addition ------ _12. PS 80-20 Reguest of Smithfield Masonic /I,/� '-- Lodge for replat of Lot 3, Block C, ' - Smithfield Addition ta� 13. PS 80-21 , Request of Louis McCrory for - re-rlat of Lots 16R1 & 16R2, Block 2, Moran Meadows Addition 14_ PS 80-23, Request of WPW Management Corp., for final plat of Lot 1 , Block 1 Colte e Circle Shopping Center Addition _ 15. Consideration of County Fire Protection !AMP p , Contract 16. Consideration of Ordinance changing the hw = O i designation of State Highway 121 (Gra evihe Hw rJ-� 3A �� CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA or the Meeting , at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMSER ITEM tCTION TAKEN . ' . _ • .,n . . 19 ••. .• .1 • , - . . .- � • -. • i• .: •n.. i• _`�I=• L_�rI/// I 1 .I . '.I . .• • 'n . n ' 'I. _i.. NW _ _-- " 1 .• •. . • . I .- a .. Millallialla .. ..: .- I . . . . 1. • H. • • • f� M c ._. •.. • • .. • . . .. . •. . Funded . Tarrant Count tthrou. HUD's —_ Ol . . •. •n•. • . - GO_ ___mrun '4 D j ll.rte: "l .. . le 'n• • -u-. 21 _Ennsjj1Pratinn of Water k CP. - I . WI _21 ncidrratinn of rhanga nrdpr fl in thn To bee •aid ro. Itilit Bon. un. . • p 1 - • I . ' 'u. r//— ' M _ n • . ' ...• . .• .... . . �� nn R r•cay Rnad .• '.P • •I . .. I • • . 1 . .• •al_d from Utility Bond Fund Tank and Tron Works Inr. in tha • _amount of C51 ,0R 20 fnr 2 0 tin Ploy. -. • .. . .. '/5_ starano tank It 26 ranc dp-a+ fly 9f rz.m=a - t. •Ab9 • .. ' . on Gener.1 nc Sur•lus .. . . .I . •. • II .m R-venue Sharin. and u • . .n.. . . •• - I • • �• n�P -r. , nd Sur.lus • ' , ' , •o . n. • ..1 • 11 �1//--i %►•'It.'7 —r 2R — rnncideratinn of pa .-• • O . • . .. . . cc' I. ec,i,' _i in th . • ' • • I • n. II nlanaieu-Right-of-wa.v_n. • " 29 ConcidPration of title rhangp and mA u-• any dvinllrmmnal_ 1.1117 I fella // UL // ill .�_ • - 1'k• MIS e— 1 A t!1 I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, MAY 12, 1980 - 7:30 P.M. 1 . Mayor Faram called the meeting to order May 12, 1980, at CALL TO ORDER 7:30 p.m. 2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor ROLL CALL Jim Kenna Jim Wood John Michener Councilmen Bob Brady Wiley Thomas Dave Freeman Sharyl Groves Councilwoman STAFF: Tom Paul City Manager Jeanette Moore City Secretary Rex McEntire City Attorney Richard Albin City Engineer Margie Nash Planning & Zoning Member Jo Ann Williams Board of Adjustment Member 3. The invocation was given by Mrs. Stella Ramsey. INVOCATION 4. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, APPROVAL OF MIN to approve the minutes of the April 28, 1980, meeting. OF 4-28-80 COUNCIL MEETING ' I Motion carried 7-0. APPROVED 5. Mayor Faram read the following resolution: CONSIDERATION & APPROVAL OF RESOL- RESOLUTION NO. 80-15 UTION CANVASSING VOTES OF MAY 10, 198( WHEREAS, on the 10th day of May, 1980, being the second RUN-OFF ELECTION Saturday in May, the run-off election was held within the ELECTING PLACE 4 corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, APPROVED for the election of City Councilman Place Four; and, RESOLUTION NO. 80-15 WHEREAS, the following candidates for the office received the number of votes shown opposite their names as follows : NAME OF CANDIDATE OFFICE NUMBER OF VOTES Tom E. Newman Councilman Place Four 71 J. C. Hubbard Councilman Place Four 261 WHEREAS, as provided in the City Charter of the City of North Richland Hills , Texas, it is the duty of the City Council to canvass the returns and declare the results of said election; and it appearing that the following candidate should be declared elected to the office: OFFICE DULY ELECTED OFFICIAL Councilman Place Four J. C. Hubbard ....,Ji " f \ . ( . May 12, 1980. Page 2 BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that the following candidate for the office having received a majority number of votes in the office named below for and during the term of two years, or until the next duly constituted election is held in said City, being the first Saturday in April 1982: . OFFICE Councilman Place Four DULY ELECTED OFFICIAL J. C. Hubbard PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of May 1980, there being seven Council persons present and seven Councilpersons voting for the passage and adoption hereof and 0 Council persons voting against the passage and adoption hereof. Dick Faram - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore - City Secretary Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to approve Resolution No. 80-15. Motion carried 7-0. 6. City Attorney McEntire administered the following Oath of Office SWEARING IN AND to Mr. J. C. Hubbard: SEATING OF NEW COUNCILMAN PLACE OATH OF OFFICE FOUR (OATH OF OFFIC~ I, , do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of (City Councilman or Mayor) of the City of North Richland Hills, State of Texas, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State; and I furthermore solemnly swear (or affirm) that I have not directly or indirectly paid, offered, or promised to pay, contributed nor promised to contribute any money, valuable thing, or promised any public office or employment as a reward for the giving or withholding a vote at the election at which I was elected. So help me God. May 12, 1980 Page 3 Mayor Faram presented John Michener with a plaque in recognition of outstanding and distingushed service to the City of North Richland Hills from April 1978 to 1980 as a Councilman. Councilman Hubbard recognized his wife, Mrs. Zoe Hubbard. 7. Mayor Faram opened the Public Hearing and called for PLANNING & ZONING - anyone present wishing to speak in favor of this PUBLIC HEARING - request to please come forward. APPEAL HEARING FOR PZ 80-7 - REQUEST Mr. John Weir, Engineer, appeared before the Council OF WELDON WARD representing Mr. Weldon Ward. Mr. Wier stated his client owned 13.2 acres that was presently zoned agriculture and they were requesting 1F-9-15 Single Family. This property is located north of Martin, south and east the Glenann Addition. Mr. Weir stated they would be developing 45 lots. Mr. Weir stated this zoning would be compatible to Glenann Addition which is to the west of the property in question. Mr. Weir stated he felt the reason the Planning and Zoning Commission denied this request was because of the proximity of Mangham Airport. Mr. Weir stated there were no violations of the air regulations. Mayor Foram asked that if, in the opin i on of the FAA, the actual level of plane could fly in from the south property line and still be above and without danger to the subdivision. Mr. Weir replied yes, that was the opinion of the FAA. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Weir how far the clear zone was from the runway. Mr. Weir stated it was about 1 ,000 feet. Councilman Kenna asked if a private plane on a baseleg flight would he over the subdivision or within the clear zone. Mr. Weir stated he felt confident they would be north of the airport. Councilman Kenna stated then the plane would come over the subdivision at 65 feet. Mr. Weir stated in the FAA's opinion they could operate very safely if they were as low as 65 feet. Ii ) ¡ t Councilman Wood stated that each type of aircraft would make a different type approach to the airport. Councilman Wood stated that single engine planes would make their turn over Glenann Addition and more than likely the baseleg turn would be over the property in question. Councilman Wood stated the FAA' based-their calculations on the slope of the land and not the height of the property versus the height of the runway. Mr. Wier stated the way thé FAA~~Øécffi~d the measuring was to a point equal to the elevation at the end of the runway shifted 200 feet to the north, fram that point on a twenty to one slope. r~rt, ~!ier stated they had taken all the facts into consideration. Mr. Walter Cook, Attorney, appeared before the Council. Mr. Cook stated the Planning and Zoning Commission denied this request because of the proximity to the airport. Mr. Cook stated they were requesting the Council to approve this request. Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Cook if the city would be liable in approving this plat. ( ) t · Mr. Cook stated the city's test was a reasonable exercise of their interpretive pOders on safety; would this be unreasonably unsafe.for..the .canmunity. .r~r.· C.ook stated in his opinion the city would not be liable. Councilman Kenna asked Mr. Cook if his client had any time plan to start the subdivision. Mr. Cook stated they planned to have the subdivision developed in 2~ years. Ci ty Attorney McEnti re asked ~1r. Cook ho\'J far the property was from the runway. Mr. Cook repli'ed it was about 1,800 feet. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. Mr. Charles Mangham appeared before the Council. Mr. Mangham stated he was in opposition to this request. r~ay 12, .1980 , Page 4 .. May 12, 1980 Page 5 Mr. Mangham stated he would not be in opposition of this request if there was some way to assure him that the people would not oppose the airport. Mr. Mangham stated he would leave the safety factor up to the Council. Mayor Faram stated he had noticed that at the Planning and Zoning meeting there was a speaker that indicated some accidents to the north of the airport. Mayor Faram stated he had observed an accident about six or eight weeks ago. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Mangham if there was anyway he could control the aircraft to get them up higher and make their approaches more safely. Mr. Mangham replied no. Councilman Wood asked what slope the glide slope light was set on. Mr. Mangham stated it was set on 5 degrees. Mr. Mangham stated he had tried setting it higher, but the pilots would not use them. Mr. Bill Stimmel , 6509 Massey Court, appeared before the Council. Mr. Stimmel stated he lived about three blocks west of the glide pattern from Mangham Airport. Mr. Stimmel stated he had flown out of Mangham and is aware of the problems the airport has . Mr. Stimmel stated he was not against the airport. Mr. Stimmel stated a plane had crashed today about 1,000 yards nurth of the end of the runway. This was a larger plane not one you would normally see caning in and out of Mangham. Mr. Stimmel stated that if the crash had been 1 ,000 yards to the north rather than the south, it would have landed on Chilton Court which was south of the proposed addition. Mr. Stimmel stated he was not against the airport but was against overcrowding in the area directly in front of the airport. There being no one else wishing to speak , Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. 8. Mayor Faram advised the Council this was an appeal hearing CONSIDERATION OF and would require a 3/4 affirmative vote of the Council ORDINANCE FOR to change the re-zoning. PZ 80-7 DENIED Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to deny PZ 80-7. f,1ay 12, 1980 Page 6 Councilman Freeman stated he based his motion on his belief there was a safety problem. Councilman Freeman stated he felt it was just a matter of time before someone in that area would be killed and he thought approving this request would increase the chances. Councilman Freeman stated a part of him said approve the project because anyone financially able to buy a house should be able to purchase one where he wanted to and hopefully under these circumstances they would be wise enough to realize these are in a dangerous zone. .. Councilman Wood stated he felt strongly that there were two sides to look at and you had to weigh the maximum to the citizens. Councilman Kenna stated he would have to take up ,;ssuewith ~his colleagues; he did not think it was up to the Council to determine if the airport was safe or whether the subdivision ~Jas safe. Councilman Brady asked if all the known or existing safety requirements had. been met. Councilman Freeman asked the City Attorney to comment on Councilman Brady·s question. City Attorney McEntire stated the only safety requirements he knevJ of were contained in publications by t.h,e FAA and~th'is pqrticular airport was not controlled by the..,FAA. Mr. ~1cEnti re stated he 'did not know whether or not the requirements had been satisfied . for the Council. Motion to deny failed by a vote of 4-3; Councilmen Wood and Freeman and Councilwoman Groves voting for; Councilmen Brady, Kenna, Hubbard and Thomas voting against. Councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to approve PZ 80-7. Motion to approve failed by a vote of 4-3; Councilmen Brady, Thomas, Hubbard and Kenna voting for; Councilmen Wood and Freeman and Councilwoman Groves voting against. Mayor Faram advised the Council the motion did not 'receive a 3/4 vote, therefore, the re~zoñing request WqS "denied. 9.. Mr. Dan McLeland, Agent, Jamies Restaurants, appeared before the Council. Mr. McLeland stated he wished to appeal the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial of this application for rezoning fran Commercial to Commercial-Specific Use- Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. Mr. McLeland stated the property was located on Bedford Euless Road. PLANNING & ZONING - REQUEST OF AN APPEAL HEARING ON PZ 80-15 - DAN MCLELAND, AGENT - JAMIES RESTAURANT APPROVED Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to grant an appeal hearing to Jamies Restaurants to be heard June 9, 1980. flay 12, I'r40 Page 7 Moti on carried 7-0. 10. Mr. Joe Gray, 9216 Amundson, NCH, appeared before the CONSIDER/IT ION OF Council. CEUUEST OF ER. JOE E. GRAY, 9216 Mr. Gray stated that if he lived in many areas of • AMUNDSON DRIVE, FOf North Richland Hills he would not be making this request. VARIANCE FROM 1HE Mr. Gray stated he did believe the regulations on fences BUILDING CODE around swimming pools were applicable in most areas. The APPROVED majority of the homes were on 100 foot lots and neighhors on both sides and across the street. Mr. Gray stated he lived on an eleven acre farm which was in the northeast portion of North Richland Hills. Mr. Gray stated across the road from him was 62 acres and the nearest people to him had five to seven acres. Mr. Gray stated his nearest neighbor was about 1 ,000 feet away. Mr. Gray showed pictures of the location of the pool. Mr. Gray stated he had five strands of barbed wire around his property and no trespassing signs posted. Councilman Wood stated that in reference to the ordinance, paragraph D, which states "the Board of Adjustment and City Council may make modi frcations in the individual cases. Counci lman Wood stated that paragraph D of the Building Code stated all gates or doors opening through such enclosure shall be equipped with a self-closing and self-latching device for keeping the gate or door closed at all times when not in actual use." Councilman Wood asked Phr. Gray if he was making an offer whatsoever to secure the area frail children who could crawl through barbed wire fences. Mr. Gray stated that the nearest house was 1 ,000 feet and he did not think it would be necessary in his case. Councilman Wood stated he thought he had seen a house within 200 feet of Mr. Gray's property and another one under construction. Mr. Gray stated the house was not occupied and the other one was about 350 feet of his house. Councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Mr. Gray's request for a variance from the Building Code. Motion carried 4-3; Councilman Kenna, Brady, Freeman and Hubbard voting for; Councilmen Wood and Thomas and Councilwoman Groves voting against. r~ay 12, 1980 Page 8 11. Mayor Faram advised the Council the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval of this request. Counci lman Hood moved, second'ed by Counci lman Freeman, to approve PS 80-16. PLANNING & ZONING PS 80-16 - Rr :5T OF LARRY R. HLJ rCHEI FOR REPLAT OF LOT . . BLOCK C, HEWITT ESTATES APPROVED Motion carried 7-0. 12. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PS 80-17. Motion carried 7-0. PLANNING & ZONING REQUEST OF CONoeo, INC., FOR REPLAT OF LOT lR, BLOCK B, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION APPROVED PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING - PZ 80-14-REQUEST OC CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Te REZONE TRACTS lA, lAl, & 2F, ABSTRAC 1606, FROM MULTI- FAMILY & LOCAL RETA TO IF-9-15 ONr FAMILY 13. Mayor Faram opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mrs. Nancy Strauser, 7525 Circle, appeared before the Council and made the following statements: III represent a group of homeo\vners from Holiday North Addition of this City. To save time and to let it be known who this group is, I would like to ask that those property owners that feel as I do about this zoning please stand. I would like to thank the members of the Council and the Mayor for the interest that was shown by coming out and looking at the property that we are discussing at this time. There were some that felt as if they knew this area pretty well, but still came out to take another look. We feel that by doing this you are more aware of the problems and possible solution that accompany this zoning request. I I. l . We do want the Council to know that we are still supporting the decision of the previous council, of which two of you were members, to request the rezoning of this land and also supporting the Planning and Zoni'ng Commission i,n their recommendation for approval of the zoning change. I would like you to take into consideration now some of the history of this area. Back in· 1967 and 1968 when the Comprehensive Master Plan was accepted by the Council, this ~req that we are speaking of was zoned single-family, low density in the area in which we live and also the area that is under consideration, except for a part that is in the flood plain which was designated as public and semi-public property. I point this out because the question has been raised that this land has continued to grow in the way that it was originally planned, which it has not. May 12, 19110 Page 9 If we look further we will notice that the land that is now being developed into Holiday West, which is single- family, was at that time zoned industrial. That too has changed. This whole area has changed since that time. We have more single family in this area than was originally shown. We have no multi-fancily zoning in our immediate neighborhood. We can look also at the map that shows where our primary and secondary thoroughfares were originally proposed to be. We can see that back at that time Noreast was to go through to Rufe Snow, making a secondary thoroughfare. Fieldstone at one time was proposed to be a secondary thoroughfare. Holiday Lane was suppose to be a secondary thoroughfare. As it is now, that has all changed. Noreast was cutoff when the School District bought property to use as a sportsfield. Fieldstone was cutoff when J. B. Sandlin built a house in line where the street should have been. Holiday Lane is still not connecting with Watauga Road and may not connect. North Richland Blvd. is a secondary street but is currently being used as a drag strip. It does not go through but borders this property in question. It clearly states in our Zoning Ordinance on page 8; "It is anticipated that additional areas may be designated in the multi-family district from time to time in the future where such change is appropriate and access and utility services can reasonably accommodate the increased density. These districts should be located in proximity to major thoroughfares and preferably adjoin business zoned property.' Concerning the property that is facing Holiday Lane, it also states in our Zoning Ordinance on page 9; "These areas should primarily be located at the intersection of major thoroughfares" and this is concerning local retail. I feel as do the rest of the neighborhood that this is enough in itself to show just cause for not developing this as multi-family. If we don't abide by our Zoning Ordinances, why waste the time and energy. The nearest major thoroughfares to this area are Davis Boulevard and Rufe Snow Drive. We all know what kind of roads we are talking about when we mention either of those, and hopefully, the condition of both will soon be improved. But it surprises me that any builder would ask that we open up our residential street to traffic such as set out in our ordinances for secondary and primary thoroughfares, on a street that has trouble at times absorbing the traffic now. If Davis Boulevard and Rufe Snow have trouble doing it just think what it would do to us. \~e feel that not only would this cause a problem for us now, but if we have to again reconstruct streets, in this case being our residential streets, because of the excess traffic this does not fall back on the builder to help improve, this is going to COlle out of our city taxes and increase the burden of the homeowners that live here. In regard to the street situation, I honestly feel if the City Council had been intent on Multi-family developing in this area, that along the way provisions would have been made to develop our streets into wider widths that would withstand the traffic and also to have made provisions for more access by primary thoroughfares. ' We, in one way are trying to make judgments on the past councils of our city. We are not trying to look back and say what if. We are dealing with the present. Things have changed in the past 11 years. The conditions are no longer the same as they existed at that time. That is why the City has been given the discretion to make changes that become necessary. Zoning on undeveloped land should not be expected to remain the same forever. In this instance, I feel that the zoning was speculative at the time, with the owner hoping to use it as an investment. The city is not responsible for quaranteeing that anybody can -make J)lOneY off. of an investment. We by no stretch of the ima9ination or twisting of words, want to take and confiscate anyone1s property and throw it in a scrap. pile. Number one, \~e are only interested in the betterment of our nei ghborhood, as \ve a 11 have invested in thi s property that we own; also number two, to try to avoid future problems for the city which would fall back on us as taxpayers and number three, to came up with an equitable solution for the property owner. We feel that we could do that. We have met with Dal-Worth, who is holding a contract on this land. We have offered an alternate proposal to them that would fit into all three categories I mentioned. \~e were nlet with the fact they were in the building of apartments; not houses. They were not interested in our neighborhood; they were interested in apartments. They had met all requirements and specifications as they saw; overlooking I think the street situation, and that if we were unsatisfied with this that they would let a judge decide. I, myself, take great exception to the fact that this is so easily and readily an escape for them. We would have originally in October been willing to sit down and negotiate a solution on this thing. Their first impulse was to sue the City because of their decision to deny the plat by doing this, they in turn are suing us, because we foot the bill. They looked at all the information and data that was presented and decided that it was in the best interest of all to deny the plat. r~ay 12, 1980 Page 10 t· Play 12, 1930 Page 11 The builder, hoping to soften things , orally amended the p lat with something that was not acceptable either and in that, helped the Judge to rule against the plat. The City Council again decided after hearing all information and data that was presented, at that time being none from the builder-developer, voted unanimously to send this zoning back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for recommendation on a zoning change. The Planning and Zoning Commission took into consideration the information and data that was supplied, at this time sane information from the developer and other property owner, and voted to request approval for zoning this back to single-family zoning as it was originally set out to be. This being the fourth time that those people were placed in the position to rule and make a decision, they voted that this zoning should be changed. There are also other considerations that we feel should make a difference in this case. One in particular is the drainage problem which we do have now. We feel that not only would this endanger property and perhaps lives in some instances , for our immediate neighborhood, but also for those people on downstream of us who at this time sanetimes have high water problems. We have in the past when we have had high rains , as I know we have stated before, have had water up over our curbs and standing up four feet in our yards. We feel that by compounding this situation with this additional concrete Fran streets, driveways, roof tops and anything else that is going to allow rain to runoff , will cause us an even greater problem and possible flooding. Wi11 the city make good our investments if something like this should happen? We are also concerned with the increased population, mainly children, that would cane from these apartments. We certainly have nothing at all against kids, we have approximately 40 on our one street, but the fact is they will have no place to play except down by the creek or down in our streets and yards. We have enough trouble now watching out for our awn children with traffic, much less anyone elses' . Also we feel as if we are going to be giving an open invitation to make our street, being Circle Drive , an open raceway for the high school kids. Not all high school kids , but enough that matters, already speed down through our streets. Many of us could speak of property that has been damaged and scares that we have had by a speeding car. Just a day or so after our last P & Z meeting, one of our children on Carolyn was hit by a young man driving too fast. This child was a fifth grader. She could have gotten out of the way probably if the car had not been going so fast. Must we have a child seriously hurt or killed before this would make a difference? Would the city make this good to us? May 12, 1980 Page 12 Also dealing with children, our elementary school is how completing its first year without an overload of children. We are at a comfortable limit. Birdville does have in the plans for a newer elementary school but in the meantime we must absorb these children because that's what the school is there for. We feel as if this is not only unfair to our children, but also to put these other children in the situation where they might not be able to get the attention and education they need by overcrowding situations. We are very happy at this time with Holiday Heights and feel that our children are receiving what they should, and we would like to continue that. .. The high school is supposedly going to enlarge. There is an expected growth of 600 more children. Anyone that has had any dealings with the high school knows that it is extremely large now. To add what might come from the apartments would be only compounding that problem also. Not to speak of the traffic situation around the high school and on Holiday Lane. It is expected in our society today that all high school students drive their own car. By looking at the parking lot at Richland High it would be hard to believe we are in an energy crisis and that we are conserving gasoline. We also feel that we are apt to lose on our property valuations. We do know that regardless of what is going to go in there we are going to have to continue to pay the same amount of taxes on our homes. We also know that when and if we should try to sell our hanes that we wou ld not be ab le to get as much for them. We realize people do not want these problems in their neighborhood and therefore, we would not be able to ask or expect as much for our hOOles. Would the city make up for our loss? We have a very good police and fire department as it is now. We do have things that need changing, but they will be worked out. We have talked not only to same' of our own, but some in different parts· of Fort ~Jorth and each of them contend that thi s does add to the problem of crime in our neighborhoods. We have been called many things, but we are concerned. We are concerned about each other's homes and children. We don't want anything or anybody coming into our neighborhood that is going to harm anyone of us. We know who is US·U.ålJy i.D and out and we note peqJle that look suspicious and questi onab le or out of the ordi nary around here. W'e 're g oi ng to be able to help as best ,we can to find the solution. If we have this overload of cars and population there will be no way that we can possibly keep tabs on what's going on. In this way, we are helping to eliminate a problem for the city as far as additional police protection. We can help each other. We are a good neighborhood. fly 12, 1980 Page 13 We have been accused of not wanting apartments. We are saying that we don' t want apartments in our neighborhood because of the problems I have stated. We are not saying that apartments are not good anywhere they are located. We, too, have lived in apartments. It is a fact that many people have to. We are certainly not trying to typecast these people as being ugly, ' had or different. But few will argue the point that when given a chance to get out of apartments and into your own home that the chance is taken. We just realize that because of apartment dwellers being so transient and because of the other problems that I have stated that we have a desire not to have them adjacent to our property. We do want to say that the majority of us did realize at the time that we bought our homes that this property was zoned niiti-family. We were also told by either real estate people, many of whom were employed by J.B. Sandlin who was at that time an owner of this property, that this area would not he developed because of the flood plain. It was to have cost too much to develop the area so that it could be used. We have also been told by city employees , not knowing that we would ever need to know names, that this was the same situation. It was only last spring that many of my neighbors were told this by the city, and after being reassured that nothing would be built there that they built additions on their homes and some added swimming pools. Will the city make good their investment if they choose to move but can't recover the money for that? We feel that the proposed apartments would be very much out of character with the neighborhood. The "luxury apartments" as they have been called are to be constructed out of stucco and redwood. We feel that if the restrictions on homes in our area are to a certain degree, that this would also be the same for apartments. he have seine stucco and redwood apartments on Plapl ewood, I now you are all familiar with them, and they have been a nuisance since they were built. They also look very bad. Would any of you want your fence hacked up to that? I 'm sure riot. All of you have very nice homes and would want to protect them from something like that. We feel the same. There are proper places for apartments, places where they are readily accessible to major thoroughfares and would not cause an unnecessary traffic burden from its occupants. We also are very leery of a developer, not even for NRH, coming and building this apartment complex in phases. We may not be builders, but we do have a reasonable amount of knowledge to know that the part of the land that is least expensive to build will be built first. Eut there is nothing to say that when this land is built and the profit is started to be recognized that the development work for the channel and area west of the creek will not be completed or that he will build beyond Phase I. We have all read or heard about projects in the past that have been done this way. We would not allow a builder who primarily works in this area and lives here to do that because of him wanting things done later, but we would have no privilege over a builder from out of the city. t~ay 1 2, 1980 Page 14 We do realize that this owner only wants to rid himself of this land. That is why we feel that we can work out a soluti on for him and us that would be beneficial to all of us and the city. We have not from the beginning wanted to cause a hardship for him. .. Let me also emphasize that we are not against anything being built down there. We were at first caught very much unaware that anything could be built down in there. We took the word of those we felt knew that nothing could or would and didn't doubt it. At this point in time we are very willing to have something down there. We have researched it and know its merits. That creek is a continuous danger to our children. It stands year round in water that at some points are as deep as six to eight feet. We breed mosquitos back in there and recently we have had water moccasions and rats to come up ,from there. We also would like to see the new city dump eliminated. Not on ly is that an eyesore for the ones of us that drive Holiday Lane everyday, but it is definitely not a selling factor for people we are wishing would buy homes in Holiday vIest. I have personally seen builders from Holiday West using that as a dump ground and for the life of me, I can't imagine how they could expect to sell a home across the street from it. We would like to see this area developed. It would eliminate a lot of definite health and safety problems. But to build in apartments, we don't know which wou ld be worse. I would like to say that I have been questioned about the legality of the City doing this rezoning. It states it very clearly in many legal references that I have researched and I have inquired of several attorneys about this. There is ample information stating that the city has the power and authority to rezone or zone for that matter, land taking into consideration the health, safety, law, ethics, and moral aspects of the property. We feel that this falls into that category without doubt. If we were trying to cause harm or in fact confiscate this property, I could see where it would not be advisable. It is salable land. We do have an alternate solution. There are legal reasons to change the zoning. We are not being unreasonable. We are not being a mob. We are not being vigilantest We are not being rebel rousers. We are not being agitators. We are not being any of the things we have been called. We are trying to handle this without too much emoti on. vIe have fran the inception of this thing been well organized, well behaved and willing to work out a solution. We have been good neighbors. We have met together, a group of 32 neighbors representing our addition, to work out a solution that would benefit us all. We feel that the single family dwellings is the way to finish out our addition. We feel the problems would be minimal. r May 12, 1920 Page 15 I have checl ed with local realtors. There is a need for good lots. The housing market is looking up. We have canpared the prices of lots that are being sold in Holiday West and the amount of land that is avai lohle next to us. We do feel as if we could work this all and really have something satisfactory to us all. I would ask that the Council continue to support the decisions of those before you. Take into consideration the research and experience that they used when making their decision and to do the same. We are here showing our support for that decision. I would also like to ask that I be given rebuttal time after the developer is presented and he in turn be granted rebuttal time. We may each have overlooked or core up with something that might be of additional help to you.^ Councilman Kenna stated that in touring the neighborhood, it was obvious there was a very serious flood problem for some of the houses that backed up to this property. Councilman Kenna asked if the homeowners did not think the rechannelization of the creek would do away with the flood problem. Mrs, Strauser stated no. They felt because of the increased concrete, and because they were lower than the field, it would continue to drain not only in their neighborhood but also downstream, Councilman Thomas asked Mrs. Strauser if he understood her to say Il many of them were aware that this property was zoned multi-family when they purchased their property. Mrs. Strauser replied yes, but they were told by the realtor it would never be developed because of the great cost involved in re-doing the channel. Most everyone in the neighborhood was told the same. Mr. Gary Morphew, 7508 Circle Drive, appeared before the Council and made the following statements: "Obviously beginning back in October and until tonight this has been an emotional issue. I feel like the citizens, the Council and the representative for the development firm have handled this in a presentable manner. This had been a lengthy matter and many of the citizens in the area have begun to feel completely unaware of the workings of city government and the complicacy involved that the city government has shown an inadequate ability to represent them. I feel this Council is willing to hear the voice of its citizens and on the surface it appears there are three main issues. The flood plain, the channelization of the creek and the tax income disparity between undeveloped land , developed for r·1ay 12, "980 Page 16 apartments and land developed for single-family. What appears to be the main issue, maybe in fact only secondary to another issue and that is what the city government's responsibility in this issue; well over 300 families lives will be affected and many hundreds more indirectly by what is deci ded here. II t- Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of this request to please come forward. Mr. George Staples, Attorney, Hurst, appeared before the Council and made the following statements: "In October the developer came in with a plat of this property. It was layed according to the city's ordinances. Yet the people rose up and spoke against it. The City Council listened. The main thrust of the arguments, as reflected by the minutes, was that they did not want any apartments out there despite the fact it was legally zoned for this. Now, you recall I was not a party to that. Generally speaking, people do their O'fln thing. They do not hire lawyers until they are in trouble. There was a lawsuit. We think the judge probably decided wrong, but it was my advice which Dr. Pentecost followed. That instead of taking an appeal on this case we would follow the business of the plat and meet Jim Anderson's objections to the plat that there were not suffi ci ent streets through the deve 1 opnìent. We put the street on the plat and submitted it,at approximately the same time there was a meeting of the previous council who voted to send the matter to the Planning and Zoning to consider rezoning. At the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, which due· to an error or oversight, the recorder was not working and you do not have verbatim minutes, the statement was made because the property had single family from 1967 to 1970, as I recall and for this reason it should be rezoned single family at this time. Now we spent considerable effort going back and trying to.find out what the records of the city were. In about 1968 you had a Comprehensive Plan that was prepared. This Comprehensive Plan recommended that this property be public or semi-public open space. There was no Comprehensive Plan that it be single-family residential. The City Council zoned that property in 1968 single family. Approximately one year thereafter the developers of this property, and they were owners of much of the surrounding property, came in with plans. Mr. Staples gave the Council a copy of the plans. This depicts the property in question as well as the property immediately to the east and it shows what the plans of that development was. This was submitted to the City Council after the Planning and Zoning Commission saw it and the City Council unanimously voted with one abstaining that"this propert~.,be rezoned to Local Retail' and Multi-family. This was in about ~1969. In other words thlS property was zoned single family for approximately 1 to l~ years. flay 12, 1980 Page 17 Since that time much of the property in that area was rezoned. Most of it was rezoned for higher uses. By in large development has taken place substantially in accord with this plan as rezoned. That was in 1969. Dr. Pentecost, whom I represent tonight, owns the 36 acres which was the subject of the earlier plat and which is also on the agenda for an item for you after this matter is attended to, bought this property after it was zoned Local Retail and Multi-family. In order to prepare for this and we quite frankly are unsure about the legal description; whether it really describes the property. We have attempted to point this out and have submitted to the City Secretary a protest against this rezoning for both technical reasons and also because we feel that it is both inappropriate and it amounts to confiscation of Dr. Pentecost' s property. There were many words used here in the initial presentation that this would not confiscate the property. Ladies and Gentlemen, they are not talking about a reasonable plan. They are talking about this 36 acres presently zoned for 11 years multi- family and Local Retail and zoning it single-family. Now we have gone through the effort and we will try to go through it again to show you what the facts of whether this property is usable or can he used for single-family residents. We can not approach you until we get into the platting process. We have dealt with the flooding. We have dealt with it on the previous plat as well as the present plat, Your own engineer has stated as far as the drainage was concerned, we have dealt with this according to your ordinance. We have a 100 year flood allowed for as far as channeling. This is not the first phase of developing. This plat, you will see later, does not have us develop the best part first and leave the channel for later. It has us expending a couple of hundred thousand dollars for improvement of this channel to considerably reduce the flooding of these people now and flooding caused by property even further off-site. Naturally, we cannot say waht the ultimate development of this property will do. Most of the flooding that takes place here takes place on the immediately adjacent property because this property is low. As far as this property being developed causing flooding, we do not think you can show, or we think we can show that it would not cause any particular flooding hazard. The main water that canes onto this comes from upstream. Now many people have said that we should safeguard all property in the city because of any possibility of anybody being flooded there should not be any development. This is not realistic. We cannot. take the Flood hazard all the way to the Gulf of Mississippi. We can go as far May 12, 1980 Page 18 , I r ¡ as our property, but we cannot go dovJnstream unti 1 it gets out of North Richland Hills. We have to deal with it and we have dealt with the responsibility in this plat according to your latest updated revised flood plans which are even more strict than the plans the Council considered at the last meeting. In order to try and show you what we are talking about, we think that the best thing you can use here is facts. As far as what the previous plans were, we cannot look in the minds of the Council in 1969. However, there is one important planning thing that has to be considered., Not only should you consider what is good planning, but you should not slip your zoning one way and then another. There should be same stability. People canno build, they cannot plan and they cannot grow if they do not have sanething they can rely on. .. These people have stated to you that the people that live out in this area stated the only reason they bought their homes was because they believed the property in questiòn could not be developed, even though they knew that this property was zoned for multi-family development. It is reasonable for them to rely on the inability of a developer to even come up with anything he could do. We think that the will of the people, while of no significance legally, should be considered, but it is not to be1he a,l,l and end all. This is not entirely a political process; this is not entirely a legislative decision. It is in many respects a judicial decision you are undertaking at this time. No one on the Council is counting votes in a zoning decision. What you are actually trying to see is not just the will of the people ,or what their desire is, but what is in the best interest of all the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills. Apartments have to go somewhere. You cannot just take this property and say we are going to make this a public park. What I am saying is there has to be some use for the property. Now what I would like to do at this point is to go through some of the exercise we went through with the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the useability of this property for s'ingle- family development. We have a buyer for this property for multi- family. We have done this two ways; we have gone first and considered the one side that is to the east side of Calloway Branch. We have thrown in the west side if you want to see what the whole property would bring as far as development costs are concerned. The most number of single residential lots that you could get on this is some 78 lots. If you will look at the cost of developing Calloway Branch, channelization at $279,000.00 and there is no difference in channelization whether you channelize for single-family or multi-family. The whole thing is caused by the 100 year flood. You have to get the channel through to accommodate the 100 year flood. What I am trying to tell you is with the development cost alone of nearly $8,000.00 per lot we can not economically develop and market these lots. We are trying to come up with a decision here, where we have a conflict of interest. These property owners do not want these apartments next to them. We would respectfully submit to you that they have to go next to somebody. This is a good site~ That the Council eleven years ago considered all of these things. May 12, 1980 Page 19 I will go through some of the points made here by Mrs. Strauser; one of these was that the children would crowd the schools. I do not think that is true, there are very low numbers of children in apartments. The studies that I have seen indicate apartments do not place the burden on schools. What places the burden on schools is single-family development. As far as open streets to high school kids, no matter what goes in there the streets are going in. Mrs. Strauser also says apartments will make their property harder to sell. But what she said earlier is that the city does not owe zoning to anybody. The City does not owe zoning to a single-family property owner anymore than it owes it to Dr. Pentecost. When you single out a small area such as this for special treatment simply because of dislike without any plan, that is spot-zoning. Mr. Staples advised the Council he would like rebuttal time. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Staples if he had access to a copy of the Planning and Zoning minutes on PZ 69-0, March 27, 1969. Mr. Staples replied yes. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Staples if he had read Mr. Hamm's comment aftera protest by a Mr. Wood that "plans for construction would look like plans for single-family dwelling but would be multi-family." Mr. Staples stated he had seen that comment but did not think it pertained to the property in question tonight. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Staples if he had the total amount of apartments that were being planned for the property. Mr. Staples replied he could give the number of apartments planned for Phase I because that was all that was planned at this time. Mr. Hedgcoth stated Phase I would be 100 units, Phase II would be 100 units and he did not think they could get 100 units on Phase III. Councilman Wood stated he had heard there would be 104 units in Phase I and Phase II. Mr. Hedgcoth stated there would be 104 units in Phase I and approximately the same in Phase II. Mayor Farani asked if there was anyway they could go along with the east side of the drainage ditch and get sane relief on the channelization figure of $279,000. May 12, 1980 Page 20 ) . I Mr. Staples stated he was not authorized to speak to that issue. Mr. S. G. Johndroe, Jr., Attorney representing Mr. Omar Harvey and Mr. C. T. Beckham, appeared before the Council and made the following statements: IIMr. Beckham and Mr. Harvey are owners of all the 13.66 acres designated as Tract II, Abstract 1606, W. W. Wallace Survey as shown on the tax records of North Richland Hills. On May 9, 1980, by certified mail you received a copy of the written protest of these owners. Heretofore, they have filed their written protest to change the zoning recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission fram Multi-family and Local Retail to IF-9-15 One Family Dwellings. .. I understand this property is zoned Multi-family and Local Retail and has been for a number of years. The owners of this 13 acre tract acquired in excess of 200 acres of land in the immediate area more than 10 years ago. These owners sold 160 acres on the west side of this tract for single family residential purposes and 33 acres to the south for the publ i c school system for playground and park purposes. They have retained the 13.66 acre tract for what it is presently zoned. Now the owners of Tract II have not brought any rats or cottonnlouths onto the property or into the area. The owners of Tract II are not using Holiday Lane as a drag strip. The speeding is not related to their land use and no offer has been nlade to my c 1 i ents. These owners purchased, in 19701and retained the 13.66 acres on this 1969 zoning and that it remained permanent. Mr. Beckham, prior to Mr. Harvey obtaining an interest in the property, participated in a portion of the cost for reconstruction of Holiday Lane which is substantially wider than a residential street and does serve and will be adequate to the school system. Mr. Beckham and Mr. Harvey have relied upon the Multi-family and Local Retail zoning of their 13.66 acre tract in all .of their future planning for development and use of their property. They anticipated to use their property for neighborhood local retail, doctor's offices, small shops, bookstore or drugstores, no large shopping center. In all probability the use of the 4.3 acres east of the creek will be used in the same ITlanner that the property to the north wi 11 be and the property to the west will be used for local retail. The proposed zoning change from multi-family and local retail to one family dwellings, if adopted by the City Council would destroy the value of this property. The highest and best use for the property is the construction and development of duplexes or apartments on one side and local retail as presently zoned. ! I. ._ May 12, 1930 Page 21 We would like to also state to the Council that the proposed change in zoning -Iron multi-family and local retail to single family zoning would substantially reduce the tax value of the property and decrease the revenues of the city. The propsed change of the Beckham-Harvey tract would he an arbitrary and ' capricious act." Councilman Wood asked Mr. Johndroe if he knew the occupations of Mr. Beckham and Mr. Harvey and where they were employed. Mr. Johndroe replied he did not know. Mr. J. B. Sandlin, 5137 Davis Blvd. , appeared before the Council and made the following statements: "Mr. Allan Hamm and I are co-owners of the corner of Holiday Lane and North Richland Blvd. I guess we are the trouble makers because we started all of this mess back a number of years ago. When we first started planning this we had a junior high site in it. We almost had a junior high there I do not remember what happened but it fell through. We had to go back to the land planner and re-design the junior high site, which was on top of a hill in Holiday North. We paid quite a bit of money to have this tract of land planned. I have been accused of telling people it would never be developed. Personrially, I have never told anyone that. We have always had a plat in our office showing that this was zoned other than single family. My sales manager has always told the sales people to tell the people what is going in around them. We have only one acre involved in this, but it is zoned multi-family and we have had a sign on it for sane nine or ten years. So we have not tried to hide anything. The people have knuwn that this land has been zoned for that purpose. We are the developers of Holiday West. We are not opposed to this zoning across the street because we do not feel like it will harm our development. Speaking of apartments and what they do for property, seems like over in Woodhaven, people knew what was zoned for multi-family and we have $150,000.00 homes backing up to apartments. I have not noticed any trouble on these people re-selling their houses. " Mr. Allan Hamm, 5737 Davis Blvd. , appeared before the Council and made the following statements: "I can remember quite well the length we went to in planning this particular tract of land. Over a period of years, we put together several tracts of land in that area and had at that time under our control, quite a large tract of land that we knew would be in the path of development of North Richland Hills. We wanted very much to do an excellent job of planning and developing that piece of property. We employed the best firm we could find. We asked them to plan that land and I think they did a very good job. We referred that plan to Carter and Burgess who added the engineering to it. We brought the plan to the city as a total plan. We have always been told as developers that we should never be guilty of spot zoning. In this particular case, I think we went the ninth mile to zone this piece of property and to plan it properly. ! I think we followed the direction of this city and all of its staff; we hëve c00pe'rated fully. I know that the city, about that time, was planning their thoroughfare program and Holiday Lane went through this property. Through Dr. Pentecost~ we escrowed the money for construction of Holiday Lane, which is a thoroughfare street and is shown on the thoroughfare program. We donated the ROW for Holiday Lane as part of the, platting procedures as the land requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Council. They required that North Richland Blvd. be a wider than nornlal street as a collector street to connect to that thorough~are. In all due fairness to these people who ,have purchased these lots fran the bui lder, who purchased them fram us, and fairness to Dr.. Pentecost, who was the ultimate receiver of the land we sold this property'to 'in"gon'dfaith, zoned as shown, I quite frankly feel the zoning should be denied.1I Mayor Faram called a recess at this time. Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council Members and Staff were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. Mayor Faram called for anyone else wishing to speak in opposition of this request. There being no me, Mayor Faram granted Mrs. Strauser rebuttal time. Mrs. Nancy Strauser appeared before the Council and made the f 0 11 (Wi ng s tatelnents : "I have a map fran the C011prehensive Master Plan that was approved by the Council in 1968 and it does show the low housing den$ity on it. Our Zoning Ordinance says that multi-family should be built on secondary thoroughfares. I have a map of the secondary and primary thoroughfare fram May of 1971 and this property is not on either. I have'the minutes of the meeting when this property was zoned. Back at that time there was no development anywhere around so there was no oppositi on to the request. It was a 5 to 1 vote at that time with Councilman Cato voting no, Sandlin abstaining due to an interest in the property and the others voting for. There was no discussion, no th ought of maj or sec ondary thoroughfares, n othi ng about the development of this area. It has also beeh said that this land was not zoned IF-9-0ne Family. The local retail and multi-family was published in the paper and it says fram its present classification of IF-9-0ne family dwelling. I have a copy of the flood way map showing how the channel runs down through there. May 12; 1980 Page 22 . RECESS BACK TO ORDER May 12, 1980 Page 23 This channel is going to have to be straightened out. It does not make any difference what goes in there, We feel that with excuvati on work that is going to have to be done over on the east side of the channel , the field could he taken over and used on the west side. With the straightening of the channel a lot of that field dirt can be used over there to develop which is going to cut down on the cost of the development. Also if the developer would request frail builders in the area, instead of dumping all their junk there, just dump their dirt that would help eliminate a lot of the cost. We feel there has been no proof or nothing said about a major or secondary thoroughfare that is going to get these people in and out of these apartments. It says it in our ordinance and it shows it in the Comprehensive Plan. We checked with Richland Enterprises on the price of what lots are going for in Holiday West. Holiday West is zoned 1F-8, which is smaller lots than we are asking for zoning for. We feel the average price is $13,800.00 per lot. If you take an acre of land and divide it into three lots at an average of $13,800.00 you will cane out with suiewhere around $561 ,000.00. If you sold off those, we are saying 38 lots over the land that is already pretty well developed, you make 561 ,000.00. That is more than what they are selling the land for. There is going to he development cost and there is going to be other things that are going to be involved. We would also like for them to not put the bridge in because we feel it will put a lot more excess traffic over there. Why can't we compromise; why can't we make a solution for everybody? At this time there are residents on all four sides of that area. If that is allowed to be multi-faniily it is going to be as if it were spot zoning. If this was bought as an investment when the owners knew what was happening , why didn't they came in then and try to develop it. The state engineer of the State of Texas states that any developer may not adversely affect the drainage in downstream areas. r~ay 12) 1980 Page 24 Councilman Hubbard stated he understood that if the developer would go in on the east side of the creek and develop hames, then the homeowners would be willing to address the fact they could go rnulti-family .- on the west. Mrs. Strauser stated they would be more willing to come to a compromise if the developer would meet thenl ha 1 fway . Councilman Hubbard asked Mrs. Strauser if she would compromise with that. Mrs. Strauser stated she would if there was no access into their residential neighborhood. Mayor Faram granted Mr. Staples rebuttal time. Mr. Staples stated he had asked for rebuttal time only if there were questions raised that he had not addressed. Mr. Staples stated he did not feel there had been any questions raised, therefore he stood on what he had presented. Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. 14~" Counci lman Wood ,moved, seconded by Counci lman Hubbard, to approve Ordinance No. 817, PZ 80-14. Mayor Faram stated he was advised by Counsel that it would take a 3/4 vote of the Council because a legal petition was submitted on time opposing this zoning. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-14 ORDINANCE NO. 817 DENIED Councilman Freeman stated that at this time he would like to get into apartments versus single family dwellings. Councilman Freeman stated something he had not reconciled in his mind and had not been convinced by a legal opinion was that the City had the right to re-zone property. Counci lman Freeman stated he hoped thi s C,OU ld be di scussed to the point that he would be ready to discuss the re-zoning of multi-family. City Attorney McEntire advised Councilman Freeman he would be glad to answer his questions in executive sessi on. Mayor Faram adjourned to executive session. RECESS Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council Members and Staff were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. BACK TO ORDER May 12, 1900 Page 25 Mayor Faram called for a vote on the motion. Motion failed by a vote of 3-3; Councilmen Wood and Hubbard and Councilwoman Groves voting for; Councilmen Freeman , Kenna and Thomas voting against; Councilman Brady abstaining. 15. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, PLANNING E ZONING to approve PS 80-18. PS 80-18 REQUEST OF Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Hedgcoth if he had a INC.DAL-WORTH INALI PLATS, NAL display of what was planned to be built in Phase I OF HOLIDAY NORTH LAT and a time schedule. ADDITION, SECTION 7 Mr. Hed Goth stated the DEfJI ED 9 y planned at this time to construct Circle Drive from the north property line to the south property line and initial stub-out of Conn Drive down to Mr. Beckham's project; channelize Calloway Branch fran the north property line at Holiday Lane to the south property line of the Pentecost property. The channel section will have a 120 foot bottam, with a 3-1 side slope and 6 feet deep. Mr. Hedgcoth stated they plan to construct the bridge across fran Circle Drive to Holiday Lane to accommodate the apartments. Mr. Hedgcoth stated they planned to start construction of 104 units at this time at the north end of the property. Councilman Freeman stated he assumed the first thing to be done on the project would be the streets and drainage. Mr. Hedgcoth stated that was correct. Councilman Freeman asked if the streets and drainage work would be done before any apartments were built. Mr. Hedgcoth stated they would start the streets and the channel work and when they got far enough long they would start the building construction. They would not he able to operate any apartments until everything was complete. Councilman Wood stated he understood there was some disagreement over the width of the street between the City Engineer and the developer's engineer. Mr. Hedgcoth stated the city engineer had requested that Circle Drive be sixty foot right-of-way from the north end of the Pentecost property to the south end of the property and the existing Circle Drive at the north and south end at the property line was only a fifty foot right-of-way. Mr. Hedgcoth stated they saw no need for sixty foot right-of-way to accamnodate the 36 acres. May 12, 1980 Page 26 Councilman Wood asked what size the street would be. Mr. Hedgcoth stated they would tie into the existing street at the north and south end of the Pentecost property. . Councilman asked if that was a thirty foot street and the city engineer had recommended a forty foot street. Mr. Hedgcoth replied yes. Councilman Wood asked if the plans had been submitted to the Fire Marshal and had the problem with fire plug location had been resolved. ~ l Mr. Hedgcoth stated he was unaware of any problems with fire plug location. Councilman Wood asked Mr. Hedgcoth if he was aware the Fire Department did not like to have apartments or any type of structure under construction that did not have a street going to it so they could get a fire truck in. Mr. Hedgcoth stated that before any actual construction work was started they would have access to the property. Councilman Thomas asked Mr. Hedgcoth that when he spoke of the bridge was he talking about Terry Drive. Mr. Hedgcoth replied yes. Terry Drive would have a bridge that crossed the channel. Councilman Thomas asked Mr. Hedgcoth if they were going to complete Terry Drive in Phase I. Mr. Hedgcoth replied yes. Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Hedgcoth if he would be objective to all the requirements being in the motion. The timing and what was being included in Phase I. Mr. Hedgcoth stated he had no objections. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to amend the motion to state the plat was approved contingent on Phase I including the completion of Cirdle Drive fram the north end at Fieldstone to the south and completion of Terry Drive from Holiday Lane to Circle Drive along with the bridge and rechannelization. All of this to be part of Phase I and the majority of the work to be completed before the apartments are completed. _I t I It - May 12, 1980 Page 27 Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to amend the motion that the right-of-way be increased to a minimum of 60 feet with a forty one foot street for Circle Drive and sixty foot of right-of-way for the bridge. Councilman Kenna asked Mr.Hedgcoth if the culvert on Lola Drive could take the water. . Mr. Hedgcoth stated the bridge did have the capacity for a ten year flood. Mayor Faram asked if that was with the improvements that were proposed. Mr. Hedgcoth replied yes. Councilman Freeman asked if the bridge would carry a ten year flood, what happened in a 100 year flood. Mr. Hedgcoth stated he could not say it would not be over the bridge. He did not have his notes with him. Mr. Staples asked the justification for the width of the street. They were uncertain about it. City Engineer Albin stated the reason for the recommendation for the street was because of increased traffic from the apartments. Mayor Faram stated he had some requests to speak on this item e. Mrs. Nancy Strauser appeared before the Council. Mrs. Strauser stated she was opposed to this plat mainly because of the traffic problem. Mrs. Strauser stated it plainly stated in the Zoning Ordinance that multi-family had to be on a secondary thoroughfare and 60 feet of RCM would not allow this. Mrs. Strauser stated that if this was approved, she felt the city needed to put one-way signs on the street so no traffic could cane into their residential area. Mr. Tom Curran, 5705 Carolyn Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Curran stated he was highly opposed to this request. Mr. Gerold Ottinger, 7520 Circle Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Ottinger stated he lived five houses from where the apartments were to be built. Mr. Ottinger stated he was 100% against the plat. Mr. Ottinger stated he felt the apartments would devalue his property. The apartments would also overload the schools. Mr. Ottinger stated the apartments would not be canpatible with the neighborhocx:f especially if they were stucco. Mr. C. C. Emerson, 7517 North Richland Blvd., appeared before the Council. Mr. Emerson stated he was highly q>posed to the plat. Mr. Fred Collins, 7528 Circle Drive, appeared before the Counci 1. Mr. Collins stated he was opposed to the plat. Mr. H. K. Shuler, 5805 Ca~~lyn Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Shuler stated that when this plat was initially presented there was quite a bit of discussion. Mr. Shuler stated that when it came to the final discussion the Council asked what Phase I, II and III was. The question also was asked that if Phase I was approved, would the whole plat be approved. Mr. Shuler asked what was going to happen nON if approved'. Mayor Faram stated yes~ if approved~ it would be the entire plat. Mr. Shuler stated that the developers could not at this time give the number of units that they are going to build at this time. Mr. Shuler stated he was opposed to the plat. Mr. Leon Hatfield, 7509 Jean Ann, appeared before the Council. Mr. Hatfield stated he would like to thank the Counci 1 for the time they had spent on studying the apartment complex. Mr. Hatfield stated that if the Council approved this to at least make it cOllfortable to the neighborhood. Mr. Hatfield stated that in ten years who knew where Dal-Worth would be. Would they build Phase I and leave the country. Mr. Hatfield asked the Council to stick to the stipulation on the width of the street. May 12, 1980 Page 28 r . l ~ t Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Hedgcoth what kind construction the, apartments would be and if he had pictures of the proposed apartments. Mr. Hedgcoth stated the constructi en would be redwood and asbestos singles and a firewall stucco. ~1ay 12, 1980 Page 29 of . Councilman Freeman asked how this would meet the Brick Ordinance. Mr. Hedgcoth stated they would meet the building ordinance. Mayor Faram called a recess at this time. RECESS BACK TO ORDER Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same Council Members and Staff were present as recorded at ~he beginning of the meeting. Councilman Freeman stated the Building Code the City now had would not allow anything but brick. The apartments, if built would be brick. Mr. Tom Moore, 7524 Fieldstone, appeared before the Council. Mr. Moore stated he mCNed to North Richland Hills in 1959 and made permanent residence. Mr. Moore stated he had seen a lot of development. Mr. Moore stated he had seen a lot of Council's premises and changes of a lot of Crdinances. Mr. f(1oore stated the citizens would fight the Council on this matter. Nayor Faram called for a vote on the anlended motion. Motion carried 5-2; Councilmen Kenna, Wood, Thomas, Freelnan and Hubbard voti ng for; Counci l\'oman Groves voting against; Councilman Brady abstaining. Mayor Faram called for a vote on the original motion as amended. Councilman Freeman stated the last time the plat came up, the citizens; the ones that border the property, were promised a 30 foot set back and there was nothing on the plans that indicated the 30 feet. Councilman Freeman stated he would like for SOOleone to respond to this. Mr. Hedgcoth stated they would put the apartments on the east side 30 feet froIn the property line. ~~ot i on to approve fai led 3-3; Counci lnlen Kenna, Thomas and Freeman voting for; Councilmen Wood and Hubbard and Councilwoman Groves voting against; Councilman Brady abstaining; Mayor Faram voting against to break the tie. 16. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to approve Ordinance No. 818. Motion carried 7-0. 17. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to approve payment to Rex McEntire in the amount of $460.00. Motion carried 7-0. 18. Mr. Charles Mettler, representative for Lone Star Gas Company, appeared before the Council. Mr. Mettler stated that each of the Council had receiv~d a letter of why Lone Star had found it necessary to seek additional revenues from residential and commercial customers in North Richland Hills. Statements of intent changing gas rates had been filed in all seventeen towns of the Fort Worth distribution system and each requesting a 9.98 in annual revenue. Mr. Mettler stated the statement of intent filed with the city on April 24, 1980, Lone Star requested an estimated $171,266.00 of additional revenue from the customers in North Richland Hills. Mr. Mettler stated he had provided the Council with a residential bill showing the increase by level of consumption. For example, a monthly summer bill of 2,000 cubic feet would increase $1.88. A winter bill of l5,000¡:cubic feet would increase $3.70. ~1ay 12, 1980 Page 30 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 179 REGARDING THE APPOINTMENT OF ALTER- NATE MEMBERS TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 818 CONSIDERATION OF PAYMENT TO CITY ATTORNEY REX McENTIRE IN THE AMOUNT OF $460.00 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE GRANTING LONE STAR GAS COMPANY A RATE INCREASE DENIED ,~ Mr. Mettler stated that in completion, please note the application before the Council reflects the Texas Railroad Commission recommendation that the investment made in the metropolitan area such as the Fort Worth distribution area was for the equal benefit for all customers within that system. Mr. Mettler stated that the Commission further concluded in the interest and fairness to all customers within subject system the rates should be uniform for each classification of customers. , , ~ Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to table this item. Motion carried 7-0. 19. Councilman Wood movedt seconded by Councilman BradYt to approve Resolution No. 80-16. Motion carried 7-0. 20. Councilman Wood movedt seconded by Councilman BradYt to postpone this item. Motion carried 7-0. 21. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Woodt to approve the purchase of an aerial photograph of North Richland Hills in the amount of $290.00. t~ot~)on carri ed 7 -0. 22. Councilman Thomas mov~dt seconded by Councilman Kennat to approve partial payment to Walker Construction Company in the amount of $92,934.00 for Central Fire Station. Motion carried 7-0. 23. Mr. Paul stated this was something new and he recommended not approving it at this time. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Brady, to postpone action on this item. May 12, 1980 Page 31 . CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING SERVICES OF ASSOC- IATED UTILITIES SPECIALISTS & REX McENTIRE, ATTORNEY TO INVESTIGATE, ANAYLZE AND ADVISE THE COUNCIL IN CONNECTION WITH LONE STAR GAS COMPANY·S RATE INCREASE REQUEST APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 80-16 CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT BETWEEN TARRANT COUNTY, CITY OF HURST, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CONCERNING IMPROVEMENTS OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD BETWEEN GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY & WATAUGA-SMITHFIELD ROAD POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $290.00 APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT TO WALKER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE Ar~OUNT OF $92,934.00 - CENTRAL FIRE STATION APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION WITH TARRANT COUNTY POSTPONED Motion ~arried 7-0. 24. Mayor Faram opened the Public Hearing on street improvements on Booth Calloway Road and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed the Public Hearing. 25. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No. 819. The caption of Ordinance No. 819 reads as follows: [ . AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVIDING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING STREET: BOOTH CALLOWAY FROM LOOP 820 SERVICE ROAD TO GLENVIEW DRIVE IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, LETTING CONTRACT TO FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION: MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBTEDNESS THEREBY INCURRED: MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS THEREFORE FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR METHODS OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE ESTIMATES OF COST; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENTS ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOK OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDINANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORD OF THIS CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion to approve carried 7-0. , 26. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Ordinance No. 820. The caption of Ordinance No. 820 reads as follows: I ¡ ~ ~ . AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING ESTIMATES TO THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS AND OF AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON THE FOllOWING STREET: BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD FROM LOOP 820 SERVICE ROAD TO GLENVIEW DRIVE IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TO THE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND TO ALL OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES; DIRECTING THE ~1ay 12, 198'ù Page 32 PUBLIC HEARING ON ~TREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD BETWEEN GLENVIEW DRIVE AND LOOP 820 SERVICE ROAD CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVIDING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD ,APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 819 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING ESTIMATES FOR It1PROVEMENTS ON BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD APPROVED ORDINANCE NO. 820 ~ ( . " [ e CITY SECRETARY TO GIVE NOTICE OF SUCH HEARING; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOK OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDINANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE . ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Motion to approve carried 7-0. 27. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Ordinance No. 821. The caption of Ordinance No. 822 reads as fol10iJs: ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A PORTION OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING STREET; BOOTH CALLOWAY FROM LOOP 820 SERVICE ROAD TO GLENVIEW DRIVE IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS; FIXING CHARGES AND LIENS AGAINST PROPERTY ABUTTING THEREON, AND, AGAINST THE OWNERS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE RIGHT TO ALLOW CREDITS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE RESPECTIVE ASSESSMENT TO THE EXTENT OF ANY CREDIT GRANTED: DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THE ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTES OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND BY FILING THE ORDINANCE IN THE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF SAID CITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECT DATE. Motion to approve carried 7-0. 28. Mayor Faram stated this resolution could be passed and the Council each appoint two members to the Commission. The deadline for the Charter Commission to report back to the Council was set for July 1, 1980. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Counci,lman Wood, to approve Resolution No. 80-17. Motion carried 7-0. 29. Mr. Jim Bowen, 4704 Susan Lee, North Richland Hills, appeared before the Council. Mr. Bowen stated he wanted to build a 20x24 foot storage building in his backyard. Mr. Bowen stated he wanted to use 1x12 prime masonite siding instead of brick. Mr. Bowen stated the building would be strictly for storage. Councilman Wood asked what type of foundation he planned to use. Mr. Bowen stated the foundation would be slab. ~1ay 12, 1980 Page 33 . CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A PORTION OF THE COST OF It·1PROVING A PORTION OF BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD APPROVED DRDINANCE NO. 821 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPOINTING A CHARTER AMENDMENT CO~1MISSION APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 80-17 REQUEST OF JIM BOWEN 4704 SUSAN LEE LANE FOR VARIANCE FROM BRICK ORDINANCE APPROVED May 12, 1980 Page 34 Counci llTlan ~Jood asked Mr. Bowen if hi s property backed up to canmerica,l. Mr. Bowen replied yes. . Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to grant r¡1r. Bowen I s request for a vari ance from the brick ordinance. Motion carried 7-0. 30. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of May 12, 1980, àt 12:15 a.m. ADJOURNt~ENT Dick Faram, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary r . \ . í I Ie 1 . MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820~ MAY 22, '1980 - 7:30 P.M. 1 . Mayor Faram called the meeting to order t·1ay 22, 1980, CALL TO ORDER at 7:30 p.m. . 2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor ROLL CALL Jim Kenna Jim ~'Iood J. C. Hubbard Councilmen Wiley Thomas Bob Brady Dave Freeman Sharyl Groves Counei l\¡Joman STAFF PRESENT: Jeanette Moore City Secretary Pam Harwick t~i d-Ci ties News Joe Norton The Tribune Mayor Faram stated the Council would now go into executive session to discuss personnel action. Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The same persons were present as recorded at the beginning of the meeting. BACK TO ORDER 3. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to accept the resignation of Mr. Thomas Paul dated May 15, 1980. RESIGNATION Motion carried 7-0. 4. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman, to accept the application of Mr. Charles Williams for City Manager. APPOINTMENT Motion carried 7-0. 5. Mayor Faram adjourned the special meeting of May 22, 1980. ADJOURNMENT Dick Faram - Mayor ATTEST: ~eanette Moore - City Secretary .' ,. ;' " ,IÌ t~J~II>.4~ J l fllUli "TlìnIlfJUIII""~ll r..ßnl!lil"_"'NWfD¡Rf1"Aj~~;.~lJ1t__11Urí))~'_ . ~. INfORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. '" ..... .. . , . ~' ~ Date: June 5, 1980 ; '''').IF Subject: Counci 1 Meeti n9 on June 9. 1980 Items on the Pre-Council session. i Ilf ~i ,"'. 1. The Bent Nail 'Developers received approval from \~atauga to develop their sub-division located west of Rufe Snow Drive between the railroad tracks and Watauga Road in Watauga, however, the two (2) streets they laid were only approved by Watauga up to our city limits. They extended the street to Rufe Snow without any approval from this city and certainly not to our standards. ~'~ ~ 2. We currently have one (1) mower. Naturally, if approved, we would have to submit specifications to you for approval then go out for bids. We have approximately $138,000 in the General Fund Surplus at this time. 3. Request of the Police Department to replace their current animal control vehicle. The vehicle, if approved, will have specifications submitted for your approval. We have received verbal commitment of an in stock vehicle for $6,000. The vehicle would be'purchased from account 80-2-4306. 6. Jamie's Restaurant is appealing the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial of their application for re-zoning of sale of alcoholic beverages. 10. Agreed to all changes except #4. i 15. In short, approval of this contract would commit our fire apparatus, ambulance, etc., to any part of the county in an emergency. This would eliminate our own emergency coverage to our city. The city staff does not recommend approval of this contract. ------- E~ t t 16. The State changed Highway 121 number to Highway 26. 17. Mr. Ron Weller of North Hills Mall, is requesting to erect a billboard showing directions to the Mall from Loop 820. 18. City Attorney Rex McEntire recommends that you suspend for 120 days so that Council may study the proposed rates. 20. Authorizing City Manager Charles U. Williams' signature to represent one of two signatures required by the Corporate Board. 21. Discussed at last work session. L 22. Funded by HUD. He need to recommend to the County Commissioners Court awarding contract to lowest bidder. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER 1M\. ~UT L~!I!1I¡µJJaJUJJIM_. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS .,. ~. ,. ¥" ~< ì ~ .IJII J n r un r . Hll -- ¡ I IIII IIIÍÏ. I INfORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ~" j 1__. t J I . nil -. JlI I - _I ur._ ~ Date: June 5, 1980 I. Subject: ~~~~c~ 1 ~1eeti ng on June 9, 1980 T IllllUUlJ.l JT1!flllßllUPlmMilf ~~ No. _ ,_ _.... '_ I J 1 1 I 'T [I --I~r 11 ~r 23. Water and sewer rates discussed previously. 29. Reference to Dennis Horvath, Director of Parks & Recreation, salary increase. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER ml I fJ TR!M1VtaM NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS Bent Nail Developers, Inc. Box 8657 Fort Worth, Texas 76112 e .. June 4, 1980 Council of North Richland Hills City Hall North Riohland Hills, Tex. Dea.r Council; e We are land developers and Homebuilders in the City of Watauga. We are presently developing the Sunn~broolc Addition in \1atauga. Mr. Allen Bromstead informed us tóday that we need permission from the Council of North Richland Hills to tie into Rufe Snow Drive. Thi"s letter is a request for your consideration to allow this. e /'" C~,/ .;_I'Í~ / e City of J;(8rth Richland Hills, Texas 11\ __'!s~ ,t{ ~:.~'- ._--~ -" ! .-.-- ~\¡I ~ V . DATE: May 27, 1980 MEMO TO: Charles W. Williams City Manager FROM: Allen Bronstad Director of Utilities SUBJECT: Tractor and Rotary Mower Approximate cost $11,000.00 HEI..P ! ! SU~M~·'1ER IS HERE! Grass growing faster than mower can mow. The Public Works Department has only one (1) Tractor Mower and we can not mow all the parkways and lots in our'Cíty. e We have approximately 180 miles of parkway to mow. Please check and see if there is money available from Surplus Account to purchase a Tractor and Rotary Mower. This is an emergency. The Tractor and Mower was put in the Budget FY 79-80, but was deleted due to shortage of Monies. aiti~ Allen pb e (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 ! . e e e f / ........., .../ '/ --.." ! . .. , '-- ... -."_.>'" ... ~~// · 0 0'^~ City of JX8rth Richland Hills, Texas i¡\ ~, ., '\'r'-:~ -----;:.;:-......:~. ---J¡~'---_":'~~~ - . ,¡-,.," .-, ,- ,,/>;,...:\, ME~{O TO: c. w . WilUæn1> Cäy ~1anag elL G. tV. W~Ulia.nM Chie.á oß PoUee. Ju.ne. 3, 1980 Re.qu.e6t to PuJtehcv~e. l'JeLv AWlal ContJtoi VeJu..c1..e. FRO~{ : VATE: SUBJECT: I fte.qu.eAt Y0Uft eOYLð.,[defLau,on to alJpftove :tile pWtc..hMe. 06 a new Animal ContJtoi Vehiete. The. 6undò õaft ~~ expe.n~e '(~e. avaitabfe ~n aeeou.nt 80-2-4306. (~Æoto.Jt VeJúûe PUfLeha6u). The. ,6:ta:t.M 06 ~ aec..OU.M LOil.i ~how a $7,000.00 ~U/tpllLó at tJle. end 06 ~ budget ye.aJL. ThL6 fLe.qUe6t ÁÅ made. be.c.a!Lóe. 06 .tJ1e 6oUo~t1¡ng eoncLilioVl/S 06 oWL c..UfLJte.M Afúmal Con'vtoi TfLucJ,,: 1 . FfLame. ÁÅ be.n.t and ttLu.c..k. peAtocL[c..illy v~bJtateó v¡o.feJ1:tty at IúglwJay ."",... 1> pe.ecL~ . '2.. fftoYt,t end c.annot be. kerJ,t ..¿Vi. aUgnmeJ'lÆ:. Cau.6e-6 gJte.ateJt weCVL on weó. 3 . V,¿bfLa.;t[O n. 06 ttLuc.k. a:t ill ,6 pe,e.cú te.VLcL6 to to Of> e.n eng'¿tle paJd6, (,tJhic.h Oc.c.M~'¿on({l£y bJtMll Oft bctf£. o6fi (e.xcvnjJfe - Mt c..om}JJte6,60ft, C'~(}t{)Ung, hO~e6, exe.). 4. Engine. le.afM oil. Re.qubLeó 1- 2. quaJd6 peA uJe.eJz. Cäy BaJlJ'l bef..ieve6 the. enginê ha~ a b~oQen. ~ng. 5. Eng'¿ne~ oVVtheat¿, c'Of1/~t.ctn:tty due to ~maU fUtdiato~. Unable. to hancLee eoo,e...¿ng f> tj-6te.rn. 6. S~ DUX. JJeJl~odic..illy due to pJtobieJll In 6uu UVl.(U an.d 6il;teJr. tlJhicJ~ we have to keep Jteptaeing. 7. T~an6ntWó~on ~,Upó }Jwodieilly. 8. A1tL eoncLilioneA and de'ðfLO-6:teA aiLe. ~ne6'6,¿úe.M. OWL tota.1, depcudmeM el>ümct:ted expencU.tufte ðO~ ~ budget yeCVL iv6 $782, 533.00. Baóed on .tJ~i.l, utimate., we tVil.i have a f>uJLpt~ 06 $30,456.00 at yeaJt e.n.d. YOu.!t (tppJtoval to pUftc.hMe a HeL'J Avúmal. COn.:tJLo-t Vehlûe. wilt have no nega..tive e6 Û ecX 0 VL cU;thC)t ,the f,1otofl. Vefúde. PWtc.hctó e. ac..c..ouM aJt the totaÆ. depcuz;ånentlLe ex;~eH~e áOfL the.. yeo}t. (817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. LOOP 820/ P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118 ... ' e ~/IEi\{O TO: fROf~'{ : VA TE : SUBJECT: PAGE: c. w. ~)~am6 G . W. W«liWn6 Ju.ne 3, 1980 Requeòt to puJl.ehcu, e. ¡-Jew ArWna£ Con:tJtol Ve.lúde 2 ... Bcu,ed on xeleph.on.e eonÆ:aeú wdh -6eveJLa£ FotLd and ChevtLolet dea£eJLó, (AJe have Iteeúved veJLba£ eOl.St eõ:túndu tha.t I.StLOW we. tAJou1.d be ctb,te xo pWtehaóe the veJúûe LIJdh.otLt oveJt-~pe.ncU..YLg the fl.'totOfL Vefúûe PWLc..hct6e Aeeoun:t. A.ttaehed ~ a llix 06 -6pe.ú&.£ea;t¿o~ to be mcúled to the dea£e/L.6 SOft thw b,[d6 . Re6fJec..:t6uLe.y, ¿'á/.á(~ G. (!). (~,Uliam6 Chie6 0 ß PoUee k.d e e , .' e CITY OF NORTH RICHLANV HILLS 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLANV HILLS, TEXAS 76118 SPECIFICATIONS FOR A HALF TON PICKUP TRUCK .. e Th-U ¿,peú6'¿ea;t¿on ..u ¡ntended t,o duCfL;[be a. ha£6-ton yXekup tittle}" will mLYÚmwn aeee.ptabie e.quipment and 6e.aXwteó fute.d below. Ve.IÚde6 o66eJLed 60ft pWte/1aóe. muöt be. neLû and 06 the. lCLtut, avmabte. de.h,[gn. and manu 6 aCÂ1J.Jt e. . 1 . Gfta~~ ve.hieie. wúght fta;t¿ng: 5,400 fJOuncL6. 2 . Whe.elbM e.: 130 to 140 ,[nehu IJJide. bed I.Jtyle.. 3. Engine.: S.,[x (6) eylindeJt e.q£Úpped to 0 peJLCLte. 0 n unle.aded gMoline two (2) baJULel eaJl..bUfLCLtofL. 4. TftanõITÚÅ¿,.,[on: TÝlJte.e. (3) ¿, pee.d atdoma;t¿e. 5. Re.aJt.. axle.: StandCVl.d geaJL ftctÜo. 6. T Á./Lu: F .,[ve (5) H78 X 15 BSW, load !tang e. "V". 7 . BJtaJ2.e6: POWelL MI.Ji6te.d will nfLont d~e. 8 . SteeJl.ing: POWelL a..61.J~t,e.d. 9. Extlta heavy dtdy eng.,[ne. eooling ~y¿,tem. 10. ÅUeAnCLtoJt: 55 ampefLe.. 11 . Cab heCLteJL aJ1d de6fLoI.JtefL ~ y.ó:tem. 12. Heavy dtdy fLe.aJt ¿,tep bumpeJL 6" painted. 13. Paint eoloft: Two (2) t,one bfLown and efLeam. 14. Krú;t;ted v,[nyl tJúm .,[nteJl.ioIL, 60id do~tJn .óeCLt naIL .ótofLage. beJúnd ~e.CLt. 15. AMP mUeJl. a.nd oil gau.gu. 1 6 . AM Raci[o 17. Faetofttj aiñ eonditioneJL. 18. E.6ilmCLte.d dayl.J delay betwe.en. plaúng oltdeJt and deliveJty 19. Ple.Me. ¿,ubmU a eopy 06 th.L6 .6pe.úß,[ea;t¿on noting any de.vÆA.tion nfLom the. ¿,:ta;te.d mLnimwnó will yoWL b.,[d quota;t¿on 60Jurl. e e FORV Sam LlngCVtd llub Shaw (A) (B) Payt.on WfU,ght. AJtendai.e e CHEVROLET HucUbWtg Jaek. Williamh Cent.Wty Chev. ESTIMATEV PRICES PRICE 6824.47 lehh 200.00 Jtebate 6624.47 6057.25 lehh 200.00 Jtebate 5857.25 6737.29 lehh 200.00 6537.29 6530.00 6074.24 le6h 200.00 5874.24 5700.00 6000.00 6415.00 5924.25 SHORELINE ANIMAL TRANSPORT Body TYPE L~, 6 eylind~, F-100, hand eoloJt, JtacUo, gaugu, pow~ ht.eeJting, aut.omCLtte, cU.6e bJtak.eh - ßJtont., ünt.ed gllUh, úgOJtet:te lig h.t~ , .6 up~ eo 0 ling aÁÅ.. eo ncJ1..t,[o neJt , .6lde molcUng, auXÁ.liOJty tank., 5 whÆ;te will tÁJteh F-100, %, 6 eylind~, eoloJt (eholee), pow~ h t.eeJting and bJtak.eh, 9 aug e6, aÁÅ.. eo nciU:{,o ning , au..tomCLtte, JtacUo F-150, ~, 6 eylind~, Sup~ Cab, lnc.lucUng ill equipment. ~t.ed above F150, ~, 6 eylind~, Sup~ Cab, eomplet.e, eholee 0 ß eoloJt, m[nlL6 bump~ F-150, ~, 6 eylindeJt, hand, gauge6, autn- mCLtte, po~tJ~ .6t.eeJting and bJtak.u, extJta eooling, ünt.e,d gllU.6, 5 tÁJteh, Jta.cUo minlL6 bump~ 252, ~ t.on, 6 eylind~, whÆ;te, ünt.ed gllUh, pow~ ht.eeJting and bJtak.u, au..tomCLtte, úg- aJtette light.eft, gaugeh, Jta.cUo 250, ~ t.on, 6 eylindeJt, whÆ;te, wlt.h above ~t.ed equipment. 250, ~ t.on, 6 eylindeft, whÆ;te, dooJt guaJtd6, heavy du.t.y .6pfU,ng.6, wlih above ~t.ed equipment. ~ t.o n, tan, 6 eylind~, au..tomCLtte tfLaYL6- mL6.6lo n, pow~ ht.eeJting and bJtak.eh, ünt.ed 9 la.ó.6, aÁÅ.. eo nciU:{,o ning, JtacUo 3680.00 + 110.00 bumpeft + 662.00 lnn~ .6aßety dooJt.6 4452.00 lYL6 t£t,tled 9500.00 eomplete Chevy Cab plek. up at áae:toJty OJt 250.00 dlliveJty ehaJtge. Fae:toJty In KaYL6lU CLty, Mo. 6400.00 Chev. Lov oJt FOJtd CavloJt ~ L6 a ball paJtk ßlgWte It ¿~i ~ -- .... ( .... ( __N Page 12 p & Z i-linutes A p r i 1 2 L~ 't 1 9 80 T ur .,- ----"'-... ·~""t..nr"~·¥}i~14h;~Z·-"~~¡¡'~~·~~4~·,¥-;-~.,?';;:j~~~~",,~~~;~,~~~_~ *,,;Slld"~' , The Chairman called t11e meeting back to order at 9:07 p.m. 't·¡ith the saIne Ineû1b~rs presen~ / Jack Knm.¡les said: "In light of,~~ct that this property ,·¡as zoned IF-9t~¿zg!tr 1967 to 1970, and that the General ,¡f~fñd Use Plan~ preparfd by a Nllnicip3,;V~no.ing Coo.sultant, sho-ç/s this proper ty¡...'1t·ó be lo~.¡ density residential ar~~j?Í feel this property should not be a b~¥rltët zoning of rlulti-Family. Theref~~t>I Dove to approve PZ 80-14 rezoning t 11 i r.ts::~~<i><r 0 per t y t 0 IF - 9 -15 · " ,v#1.r¡f~~I.~ ØØc9 This Botion was séconed by }lrs. Nash. #~ .:~,ø~ /~#.~ / ,..' Tnis rno tion car-ried 3-1 \vit11 ',Jarren Eckhardt voting against. CALL BACK TO ORDER The Chairman stated the Planning and Zoning Commission would not trike any action on PS 80-18 (the platting of t.his propeor:ty for tfulti-Family) until the City Council acts on the zoning request just heard. '11 A.1! ii(~" _1~~a-~"'-;H~"'=~A~"~'y':~~,:·~,,;~~~~r~~-=-~~"'.'~7~:'~.1!""=~~lkWI"~.,II:,~frW"'¥- Requ2st of Colte In\lestm~nts~ Ltd., (JaT1ie's Restaurant) to rezone Lot 3~ Block 2) Cocltran Addition, from its present classification of COßllercial to a proposed classification of Cortil~2rcial-Specific lTse-Sale of ~\lcoholic Beverages. This property is located on the south side of Bedford-Euless Road and bounded on the '{est by Tarrant County Sub-courthouse. ./ / / /"'/ ! j II) / Á"L¿(.-{,"j <'. '-_../ I . ., John Dral<e, Otffier of Jamie's Restaurant:) stated that Jamie t s is a family oriented restaurant. tIe said -they have three restaurants-t"\.¡o in Dallas and one in Arlington. }lr. Drake stated their alcol101ic beverage sale runs about 8% at their other restaurants. He said they basically sell hamburgers. r-fr. I)rake sho~ved a dra~ving of the proposed building and floor plan. }[r. Kno\vles as1:ed,about the seating capacity. . Mr. Drake said, there would be appnoximately 170 sea ts and 95 park.ing spaces. f " . . \, . . . I . I \ Page 13 p & Z Minutes April 24~ 1980 1/ \. { Bryan Anderson, part O~ffier of the proper ty, said he was born and raised on this property and this is the last piece left of the family tract. He said he was very pleased to have tl1is restaurant built here. :t-lr. Anderson said Jamie's is a super nice place to go. TIle Chàirman asked if there was anyone ,,,ho wished to speak in favor of this request. There being none, the Chairman asked if there was anyone in opposition. Pat Wolverton, 4800 Colorado Blvd., stated she had lived at this address half of her life. She stated she represents the property O\ffierS \-1it11i11 200 fee t of this property. She said she turned in a petition with 7 of the 9 names of people \.]110 \·¡ere contacted on it. She said the 2 names she did not get was - the Courthouse and a rent house that the o~mer_: lives in Las Vegas and has no interest in this area. }1rs. \~olverton said tl1ey could not get off their street onto Bedford-Euless Road in tl1e evenings and on weekends because of the traffic backing up from the intersection of Davis, Grapevine H\vy.) and Bedford-Euless Road. Mrs. Wolverton stated she and the other neighbors are opposed to this zoning request. The Chairman asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. Bryan Anderson said he also lives on Colorado Blvd. at 5200 Colorado. He said he would like to point out that the property is already zoned "Commercial" for a restaurant, Jamie's is only asking for the Specific Use for the sale of alcoholic beverages) but they are not having a bar. Bryan Anderson said his father had said several times that he had to grow 80 acres of wheat to pay the taxes on these 3 acres of mesquite trees. . . \ ( (' " . {/ \ Page 14 p & Z }finutes é\pril 2L~., 1980 The Chairraan closed the public .portion. a. ~lr. Eckhard t moved, seconded by }lrs.. Nasl1~ to deny PZ 80-15 due to the traffic problems in the area. Motion carried 4-0 for denial. -~-~p~~~~~ ~ to a proposed classification of Local Reyãil- Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverage~ This property is located on the east ,#Ide -9' of Rufe Sno~.-i· Drive> just north of Eçrkerd Drug Store. ~' Dorothy Alfano. represented hj'1 broth2r. Pete Turchiono, in his request tgfserve beer on premises "7i t11 pizza.. ¿/ ../ ~1rs. Shaunty asked if 4ëtey kno~.¡ about the 60-40 ,g- ratio. ,II ./ Mrs. Alfano said~she wasn't sure. ,,/f' Mr. Caldwell¿štated he had explained this 60-40 ratio to thÆm. , ~;i~' Ai, The Ché\.i'fman asked if t11ere ,,¡as anyone \.:lîo "lish~sÞ'~-"to spealc in favor of or in opposition to 'this request. ,,¢i / ~t~. Nash moved. seconded by Nr. K.."lowles. to. approve PZ 80-16 to t'he O"tffier of Antonio's Pizza City and "t-lould Inake it.nontransferable. The motion carried 3-0 with tLr. Eckha~dt abstaining . ( t . PS 80-13 APPROVED Request of Bank of North Texas for preliminary plat of Lot 2, Block 2, Carder Addition. Request of Bank of North Texas for final, plat; of Lot 2, Block 2) Carder Addition. . ì'lr~ Jim, llarris> ,rice President of Bank of North Texas, stated they ,-¡ere platting this property after occupying it for 10 years. lie sa~d hQ dId not kno\.¡ \.;hy it '.Jas never platted.. H2 said they plan to build a6-story building aIld a l~-story parking garage on this property. Mr. liarris said he found out that l'£5CO had never been granted an easement t~ey need. ,'p .' ~_ .,..._'.__....... ............ _.'"..,._ "':"'or ........-."":"1. 'C.:~.._.::....~ ~ '.' . ';'>' . -' '" .....'. ".' > " :tvlrs. Shauo ty asked if he \Vas a\.¡a re of the engineer's comments. "'~~~~.1~.NiA~'o.~~~ .<' ß'--t/; //- /,<;/-- S"'¿) / /1',/, .;s .;j-, I, . / y. rJ Da te : .,.~ - /0 -'" c:Ì ð ~ 5 \,y TO: ,¡ Iv 1\ 1/ #í PLAi.N I NG & ZON I NG CUI\1t~ 155 ION City of North Richland Hills Case No: PZ 3()-1S- \·le:. the unàers igned property o~~:n2rs vIi thi n t'rlO hundr2d (200) feet of .the tradC t sought to be rezoned~ hereby object to the rezofì1ng of. the said property d~scr'ibed in the application for the follm,Iing reason (5): tÌ1i<:. Le.7oning t'iOtlld,.D::l1-1.~0r<1'lctive to the public safety~ health, convenience, C0ì11Tort:) prosper"ity~ or general 'IJelfare of the present neighborhood. --------- I S i anature_:. I :;;J r '-. -. ..., -"' (\ ( ~i (. " , \ .. \ \ ;' ,\ /~ 1r, ' / \ -,-:..::. " ' _ l.,~"'\.'...,..,.~---./ ....:.."!";..-~----(.~__;, ,-.~j ..'~~-,"~:;1..-- i_ (", .~' ....,,) t ._\) \ ft't { ~'.....,.... ,} ·'2 ,..-.". \.... ..) j... ".,' ,.. \'- --_. .' . )' (..-~' , . ' ~' \ ,- ..-- , --_/.,.. '" '. ;, / ¿:-.-....." ^ I/,r" . ~,...., "'"(' f ?"~c -.." / \./ ,-c',:'/ ,; .~, ¡ >; ~ r,/ ../ ..c ) I /. i ' ?"---" .¿,.::-' -r ¡A..,' 1-; iOCÞ'~ Date: Addr·ess : ' /4-;< :J ,:) C:'\:~=(~? <:: :~), ¿ '~::::'~ ,- /0 ./ /~../ ~·c<; J ,., / ,/, ,.,- , ' ,//i '.0 ( ,.. j,."'! l__£!·i(~:,'/l-~(: ~ .',~: f< {~~ --z( - '-.1 ,I' / ¡" ¡ _ / ~ ?/l /:>- ¿~. ~,~-,,~. ,,<¿L/ . ~~ _, ://_;':1 -. j . ,: I /;_;/ ,-:~ /)Y:lt~ ê,{~ :J,- .,./ «_ 0" \... ~/..:;: L~':5-'- (:> ,. />, .' . (.7. ;; / ,: :J ..¿'..... t ,c:.( /'L..::,.;:' _¿f'__,./ ./,~ I' " I .....~.,.·L(. ,---r"\... ... ;1" I -.. 'C' .--.......... . ~ J/ ,/ ) " \ i ,1 t /' '- ,/ / I~I /' . ""of . I' ¿; ~ " /lI/71,/--¡.'.. (,[/t)([L¿/tJD'V ' L7 t/1 , '~;¡;' ,..¡ .. -!2J ,'.. / \: _..d . ~ ;' , / 'j , ~. Þ' - . Jr., ~, ,/ i~ t.--L / £.. ~=:5.-/l',.<2./\..- / II- . , //", /'~,. //'} ,-- .- ;?/)/.J l.~~r-l-~- .....~¿--~'t..1 ... l.._ ....... -... ....... -'J ~.;r;/ ;;/.. (1 t'" ...)/'. ':' ". .,.' .........::: ~"r" J <---::--,--~----~ / /'/ I .' ,-/' ,', f;r~' .1/' _, y.... (~'~,. ._,~../.,/"/-.~. /ì (t/~ ßy/ '/ ~/ - !/ , //Z·/.S-- tl,J~;!C'-]'/v-,,---~ -7 v /) {,/ o:.-A....... ( '-.I I? (/.... t:··-{- Lt· I I;;;' "hi £-/;1 /' ;{·'1,.A'!¿~ c>k:._.- / )-l~/ (y I)" ..' ,r~' <:-'\~t.-Lh',j t- lC:'lf" '~i e, ~,-- J~ü=t- -:!)c) {?"lL"Z \:'>, ~ ./ ~ /; ,... .'"::"~~. '" - - ,--,' v ,_, A . -". ' ) { I/, (".L--?'c..-<:.?__ ¿/J" .,... --..-t. -<,·X-~.' -\ ----r " ~"... ~/; I' f!' '... ~_ ..' ~-e ~- . 1 :"' "\ LtQ -">L{, ~'\ "' (> l ' ..:z'-C) \..t'>c. ~ 4¿---../ ><'é'ó / ¿L1~~/'z LJ_/~ 04, e e e \ KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas . April 7, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-15 We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. &~. CùL RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R\~A/l jc cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities Mr. James Anderson, Director of Public Works tv~~,,· ~ 7 '''''_....,.,''''' ." ,",." ,,."" .,:." ~' .,,," ",:!~<~...."~' ~... SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 .,~.'~'}'~;\'" ..,.,;'.~ J'." <d,;~' ~i,"-j.;- ~I"~;.V' ..,.-,.,- ,-\'" e -- - i J / ORDlNANCE'NO. AN ORDINA.~CE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS.. SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179 t ZOH,ItiG ORDlrtAJ'ICE OF 'THE ·CITY OF NORTH RtCHLAND HIllS·, TEXASt . PASSED.APPROVED~ AND ADOPTED.. BY THE· Pl.Aa~HING AND ZONING COMMISSION AriD TIiE CITY COUNCIL OF ,THE CITY OF NORTH, RICHLAND HILLS. NOVEMBER 13, 1967. AS AMENDED J~~UARY,27, 1975 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE ~~D PUBLIC H~\RING THE FOLLOWIN~ RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TÒ THE CITY COUNCIL OF 1h>£ CITY OF NORTH RtCp,LAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMHISSION~ . . . . RESOLVED that on Case No. PI '80-1S the fol1owi,ng described proper-ty shaJl. rezoned from Commerci a 1 I.: "',...,.," '.' . , ' , , , : ' , . ',' :' ',to :Commerci a l-Speci fi c Use-Sa 1 e' or, Ä 1 coho) 'ïC:' RE:v~ÒgP~' , , , ' , , , , ',' ,-, . . . , . " ",'., .'" Lot 3, Block 2, Cochran Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded ~n Volume' Page. , Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property ;$ ,located on ·the south slde of Bedford-Euless. Road and bounded . on the west by Tarrant County Sub-courthouse. DENIED APRIL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS ,1980. 24th DAY OF CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING, COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CiTY COUNCIL ,OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.~ PZ IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF ,1980. MAYOR DICK FARAM CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE CITY OF NORTH RI~HLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND· LEGALITY . CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO: Charles Williams, City Manager DATE June 4, 1980 FROM: Planning and Zoning Department SUBJECT: Cases to be heard by the City Council June 9, 1980 PZ 80-16 Request of Antonio's Pizza City to APPROVED rezone a portion of Lot 1, North Park (8 were contacted) Plaza Addn. from its present classi- c .) n Aa���;te, ��„H,riJJ� fication of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. _ This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive, just north of Eckerd Drug Store. PS 80-14 Request of Bank of North Texas for final APPROVED �A,y t plat of Lot 2, Block 2, Carder Addition. c9a/4 PS 80-19 Request of W. Brown Custom Builders, Inc. APPROVED t ,_ for replat of Lots 38R & 39R, Block 3, �� �c�;.uj' *� net Meadow Lakes Addition. PS 80-20 Request of Smithfield Masonic Lodge for APPROVED , replat of Lot 3, Block C, Smithfield Addn. itlp PS 80-21""4„," '"'«LC. 1st' Request of Louis McCrory for replat of APPROVED' f4( f '2` tiff F r ' Lots 16R1 & 16R2, Block 2, Morgan Meadows £rnq. "tZtc Addition. PS 80-23 Request of WPW Management Corp. for final APPROVED L 1=- plat of Lot 1, Block 1, College Circle 4.1/1-0-66,42 may- f° "LO " '�`"`�� Shopping Center Addition. 9 To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records Page lIt p [, Z ~Iinutes April 2l~, 1980 (e LJ jr 11 1"'1 .I'M! ~L~Il'llr4Q13111~""-----'-"""~~'!1~~f~~"'~~~"''''''''',~.-n'",.~~.~.''i"''~~1fi'!IW,toW>~ 1 ~ ,Ill: ~ The ChainaEtn closed the "~~ ~..v~~nded by Nrs. Nash, ~~ . =~ to deny PZ 80-15 due to the traffic problems ~~~;L,::::~~~~~~·~_._=~_~~~~~~~~~:;~~:~.tL~~.~.~~_~~~~~_:~.~:.~l~~ PZ 80-16 Request of Antonio's Pizza City to rezone a APPROVED portion of Lot'l, North Park Plaza Addition, from its present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Loc.al Retail- Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. TIlis property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive) just north of Eckerd Drug Store. Dorothy Alfano~ represented her brother, Pete Turchiono, in his request to serve beer on premises with pizza. Mrs. Shaunty asked if they know about the 60-40 ratio. Mrs. Alfano said she wasn't sure. (e Mr. Caldwell stated he had explained this 60-40 rat.io to tl1eIll.. 1l1e Chairfnan asked if there "t,¡as anyone \.[(10 wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request. PS 80-1 4 APPROVED }lrs. Nash mo'ved, seconded by rfr. Kno~.¡les~ to appro\/e PZ 80-16 to the o~'mer of Antonio f s Pizza City and \·lould make it ,TIontransfe-rable. Tile Dotion carried 3-0 \"ith [/1r: Ec,~l¡ardt abstain~r:$ L 17'W ,,:.. 1': r ",~_~,_~.ridI]!~t'¥~œ/~~!...,,,~l1IIr.P!'I"'~<!\'!'~~~~~!'~~~':"'-"~_~~I!~.."!!_~.~_~JfJl~1:~"'~: . Request of Bank of North Texas for prelimi~ ' ,6~- plat of Lot 2) Block 2) Carder Add~~JP~ øø'Ø' Request of Bank of t~orth Te~'1.S~tor final. plato, ~~~~.- ~ 'of Lot 2, Block 2, Ca~i~~Addition. ,,;<·ð-!:;:;;'~.;"~ l'Ir. Jim Harri~·'1~.:~~\fice President of Bank of North Texas) .~H't'êr th2Y were platting this property aft;~~6ècupying it for 10 years. He said he did ,~~itfÓt knot:.J' \.¡h:/ it 't,¡as never platted.. He said they ,'4P$Ø~- plan to build a 6-story building aT.ld a 4-story ~ .~.. .~~ pélrking garage on this property. ~- r·rr. Itarris said he found out that 1~ESCO had ~. never been granted an easement they need. PS 80-13 APPRO'lED e ~ . t-{ L s. S h au n t Y ét S ked i f h e ~,l a s a \../ are 0 f t.11 e engin~eL's comæents. ,"~ ,~~~~~;II:~""'..J'·:.~'~!'~~"-a.?g~~~"'~c'iIi!1~~~ e e - I" KNOWL TON- ENGLlSH- FLOWERS, I NC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort vVorth-Dallas April 15, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-16 L.R. TO L.R. - S.U. - ALCH. BEV. We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the zoning (nap should it be passed by both the Planning & Zoning COil1mission and the City Council. (~ R~lA/ljc cc: Mr. Thomas Paul, City Manager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367 tit . .,. ORDINANCE'NO. 4IÞ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXIX CH~~GES AND AMENDMENTS.. SECTION 1 OF ORDIt4ANCE #179. ZON,ING ORDINAJ'iCE OF 'THE ,CITY Of NORTH' RrCHLAND HIllS", TEXAS, ,PASSED. ,APPROVED. ~~D ADOPTED: BY THE'Pl~~HING AND ZONIHGCCMMISSIOH MID THE CITY COUNCIL OF ,THE CITY OFiiORTH. Ric~ILAND HILl$, NOVEMBER 13, 1967, AS AH£NDEO'JANUARY,27, 1975, AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE k~D PUBLIC HEARING tHE FOLLOWING, RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TÒ THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICtILÄ¡~D HILLS BY JHE PLAMUNG AND ZONING COt'îMISSION:' , , RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ '8o-ì6 the followi.ng d~scribed property shall, be rezoned from, Loc'al' Retài'l" "',.,,"'".., '," . t .' , .... . 'J',' ::" ~·,to .Local Retail-Specific Use':"Sale ~f' Alcòhòlì'è' Be~èràq~s' ,... .. " .' . ',' .., ." ,', e BEING a tract of land situated in the William Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1010 in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being,more particularly described as f61lows: COMMENCING at th~ intersection of the e~st line of Rufe Snow, Drive and the north . line of Watauga Drive; THENCE North 89 degrees 52 minutes 00 seconds East, 324.99 feet along the north line' of Wata~ga Driv~; THENCE North 00 degrees 08 minutes 00 seconds West, 389.33 feet to the Place of Beginning; THENCE FROM THE PLACE OF BEGINNING North 00 degrees 08 minutes 00 sec6nd~ West, 20.00 feet; . THENCE North 89, degrees 52 mi nutes 00 seconds East, 80.00 feet; THENCE S~ut~ 00 degrees 0& minutes 00 seconds East; 20.00 feet; . THENCE South 89 degrees 52 minutes 00 seconds West, 80.00 feet to the Pl,ace of Beginning and containing 0.037 acre of land. - / ./ 4 ., .. e - e .pOage 2 \ . This property is located. on the east side of Ryfe SOQW Drive~ just north of Eckerd Drug Stòre. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 24th DAY OF APRIL . 1980~ with the stipulation that the Specific Use b~ non~transferable. ISSION 0~¡g SECRETARY -PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION " BE IT ORDAINED "BY THE CI~ COUNCIL OF THE CI~ OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS ACTING It~ REGULAR SESSION THAT'THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ IS HEREBY REZON~D THIS . DAY OF t 1979. ATTEST: . CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE 'CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LE~~lITY CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS MAYOR DICK FARAH , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND· 'HILLS' ..... Page 14 p & z r-finl.ltes t\ p (" i.1 2ft, 1980 (e PZ 80-16 APPROVED '. (., PS 80-13 APPROVED PS 80-1 4 APPROVED (e "'\ ( The Chairman closed the public portion. Þlr. Eckhard t moved, seconded by }Irs. Nas, ~ ~ to deny PZ 80-15 due to the tra;f~~~ lems in the area. Motion carried 4-~'denial. Request of Antonio's Pizza Ci~to rezone a portion of Lot'l, North Par~laza Addition, from its present classiftcition of Local Retail to a proposed classifi.yition of Local Retail- ~ Specific Use-Sale o~Álcoholic Beverages. This property is ~~ated on the east side e,r# . of Rufe Snow D~ve, Just north of Eckerd Drug Store./p' ~#' Doroth~f~lfano, represented her brother, Pete Turcþ,gno, in his request to serve beer on preßi.ses 'vi th pizza. tJ'''''' ~/ /" Ì"lrs. Shaunty asked if they kno1'¡ about the 60-40 / ratio. // Mrs. Alfano said she ~.¡asn't sure. Mr. Caldwell stated he had explained this 60-40 ratio to trlem. The Chairman asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request. ~lrs. Nash moved, seconded by ~Ir. Knowles, to approve PZ 80-16 to the o~vner of Antonio's Pizza City and \vould make it.nontransferable. The motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Eckhardt abstaining. Request of Bank of North Texas for preliminary plat of Lot 2, Block 2) Carder Addition. Request of Bank of North Texas for final p1ati ·of Lot 2, Block 2, Carder Addition. Mr. Jim Harris, Vice PresideQt of Bank of North Texas, stated they were platting this p~operty after occupying it for 10 years. He said he did not know why it was never platted. He said they plan to build a '6-story building and a 4-story parking garage on this property. Mr. ll:arris said he found out that TESCO had never been granted an easement they need. }frs. Shaun ty asked if he \Vas a\~are 0 f the engineer's comments. -4" . I. ~ Page 15 P tl Z t-finutes Ap.ril 24) 1980 ( ( e Nr. Harris stated he wasn't sure, because his engineer was unable to attend this meeting. Hr. Cald~"ell s ta ted that th~ir engineer. Doug L( came in to see him and discussed the city's engineer's comments. Jim Anderson, former director of Public Works. stated he has worked with the bank officials on this for a long time. Mr. Anderson stated that there is a severe drainage problem at the bank. He said when Charles Reynolds built the shopping center next to the bank, it caused considerable ,.rater to be dumped on the bank. Hr. All.derson stated that ,lÍth the already drainage problem and the shoppping center water. the bank really has a problem. Nr. Anderson stated the bank has agreed to put in a storm drain. The ChairIT1.a.n asked if there was anyone ,,,ho wished to speak i~ favor or in opposition to tl1ese requests. . Nr. Knm-rles moved. seconded by Nrs. Nash. to approv2 PS 80-13 subject to the engineer's COl:~.:]en ts. 1-10 t ion carr ied 4-0. Nr. Kno~"les moved, seconded by Nt's. Nash. to approve PS 80-14 subject to the engineer's commen t s. 1-10 t ion :car ried 4-0. PS 80-16 APPROVED Request of Larry R. Hutchens for Lot lR, Block C, Hewitt Estates. Hr. Delbert Stembridge, r· seated Nr. Hutchens in his request. He that Mr. Hutchens Ot-Tiled his lot. of the one next to him and then bough!;_,~' lot behind him. "Hr. Stembridge 'sai~utchens wanted to build a garage on the ~ehind his house. but 't·ras told he had to ~ replat his property into 1 lot before he could. Nr. Stembridge stated that Hr. Hutchens agreed to the engineer's Comments. Mr. ECUlardt moved. seconded by Mr. Kno~les. to approve PS 80-16 subject to the engineer's cocments. Motion carried 4-0. ,~~tv.l.~~.,J.,t~__.~'!''''lII.p_ d_'4!' I ~ .1~;;...l~!I~;!l..",,"';.I.'fi:.~~l tt'ß. r.:~iÍ-~'~~~t.~Ii.~~J1_~ _IJ.JI.B e Owen D. Long, P. E. CONSULTING ENGINEER June 4, 1980 . Mr. Gary Ca 1 dwe,ll Building Official City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Carder Addition Lot 2, Block 2 Dear Mr. Caldwell: We have received copy of your consulting engineer's letter dated April 7, 1980 regarding our Carder Addition construction plans and offer the following comments regarding the items in Mr. Albin's letter. Item No. 1 Shown on plat as requested. Shown on plat as requested. The Bank's president has asked that the storm drain plans and parking lot revisions be submitted with or at the time of the construction plans of the new bank building, which should be completed within a period of not to exceed five (5) years, depending upon the economy. Item No. 2 e Item No. 3 Item No. 4 Plans have been revised as requested. We sincerely hope you can agree to delaying the submittal of the engineering plans on the storm drain, as this must be coordinated with the City of Hurst and the new proposed bank building. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Your cooperation is appreciated. 4Z?ojncere1f\ . ~AJ, we D. Long, P. Consulting Enginee llJ ~ r.~ J - ODL/ml cc: Bank of North Texas 1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / P. O. Box 777, Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone 817 281-8121 (Res. 281-4142) e e - ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas . May 15, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-898, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CARDER ADDN., LOT 2, BLOCK 2, REVISED FINAL PLAT, PS 80-14 We have reviewed the revised final plat for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Items 1 and 2 of our review letter dated April 7, 1980, have been added to the revised plat. 2. We would remind you of our comments in Item No. 3 concerning our request for drainage plans before the new bank building and parking lot are constructed. Also a letter agreement should be secured frOlTI the City of Hurst for approval of the proposed starin sewer connection to their system. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc cc: Mr. Thomas Paul, City Manager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 e e e ~, KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort \Vorth-Dallas . April 7, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-898, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CARDER ADDITION, LOT 2, BLOCK 2, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANS, PS 80-13, 14 We have reviewed the preliminary and final plans for the subject sub- division and offer the following comJnents: 1. We would request that the zoning for this lot be shown on the final plat as suggested by the Council. 2. The ownership of the contiguous property north and east of this lot has not been shown on the plat. Also all adjacent platting should be shown. 3. This lot receives storm water runoff from a 14.06 acre drainage area through a curb opening on the east property line. Presently this storm water is carried west overland across the lot and dis- charges onto Desiree Lane. The developer1s engineer has indicated that when the new bank building and parking lot are constructed, an underground storm drain will be provided to carry a portion of the runoff and the remainder will be carried across the parking lot in a swale and discharged at Desiree and Bedford-Euless Road. We would request that plans be submitted to this office for review showing capacity calculations, storm drains alignment and profile, and a typical section of the proposed swale. In addition a letter of agreement from the City of Hurst should be obtained for connection to their stonn sewer system and for surface water runoff discharge on Bedford-Euless Road. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367 / e . Planning & Zoning Commission, April 7, 1980, Page 2 4. The water line in Bedford-Euless Road has been incorrectly shown as an 8-inch line -- it should be a 6-inch line. Also the water line in Desiree Lane is 6-inches in diameter from Bedford-Euless Road to a point just north of the first fire hydrant shown, then it changes to an 8-inch line. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~ e R~\lA/l j c cc: Mr. James Anderson, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities -- Page 6 P & Z r"1i nutes May 29) 1980 ( v ~1IY'\(. t~~ 11 ·~"T'j~~6.I!oI.:u.~.~ua'¡;~»~~~~a.;*........~'fY\~~~W¡;: . (e Alan Hamm came forward. He stated were requesting the 2F-9 zoning a buffer bet~veen the Industri. 'nd single family zoning. ~~ : ~,ð- The Cha i rmaJJ~:~1'1 ed for anyone \'/i shi ng to spea,~fflfavor of or in opposition to . .~ þb..¥,~:;"request . p.,,,:, ~~~ There being no one to speak regarding this ~ . -~~ request) the Chair~an closed the Public #/~ Hear~ing. .p"~ ~ -~ tks. Nash moved~ seconded by Hr. Greenfield, to approve PZ 80-19 as requested. Motion car~ried 3-0. _I Lllit~..,_~~~ ~~~~~~~w---.~:.~~r~~:~·'''~~~~~~:~$_~..:t~(I:_If.~.r~ PS 80-19 APPROVED Request of W. Brown Custom Builders) Inc~ for replat of Lots 38R & 39R, Block 3) Meadow lakes Addition~ Jerry Stevens \~/ith \~'! Bro~\jn Custom Builders~ Inc. came for\4¡ard. He said they \'ere just trying to correct an engineering error; the dimensions were called out wrong on the plat~ (e Mr. Stevens said they had sold lot 38 to Dave Ritz and in order for him to fit the house he \'ants to build on this lot, they need to change the dimensions on the plat~ The Chairnlan called for anyone \-,ishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request.. There being no one to speak regarding this request, the Chairman closed ·the P~blic Hearing. Mr. Greenfield moved) seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-19' subject to the Engineer's comments. Motion carried 3-0. OLD BUSINESS None. ADJOURN~f1ENT The meeting adjourned at 8:10 P. M. CHAIR~·1AN PLANNING AND ZONING CO~.1}1ISSION ie \, SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION \tt Brown Custom Builders e . ~luC1¡i~/·, . or he doesn't b~¡lid June 3, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 As per the attached letter from ¥...nowlton-English-Flowers Inc; tþ We wish to notify you that our engineers have made the required changes. We would now request to be put on the agenda of the City Council meeting on June 9, 1980. Very~-t"ruly yours J I \ ¡ \ '. I 'f\. ·'?~_~.·,"'.')U~ tLf~.I... ~,.k'J~~?U,.J..tv~ G.,'~'-'Stevens, V.P. w. ro~vn Custom Builders -- 4950 Wesrgrove Drive/Suiì8î 0 1/C)(-.J!)OS, TC>\ClS 752ilE3/(21.:1) 233-0c)32 ~o PRC)~ ~'" q-,~~ 00~~' '.' ~,lvi ~ <' ~-. Z ili~~ ., ' I ~.: þ ~' ....... ~~LO~0 I i I i e It e / \. , ( ~ KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas . May 15, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-912, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, MEADOW LAKES, 1st FILING, LOTS 38R AND 39R, BLOCK 3, REPLAT, PS 80-19 We have reviewed the replat for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would request that the zoning for this addition be placed on the plat as suggested by the City Council. 2. Utilities should be advised of the replat in accordance with City Staff procedures. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. raø~ RWA/ljc cc: r'1r. ThomasPau 1 , City Manager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367 . ,~ . . I I ( \, c-e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS~ ~1A Y 29) 1980 II f1 J J:.~M.!(1ìAi:.4IIMl.n.1ft..~~~~~ CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman) Mary Jo Shaunty, at 7:35 P. ROLL CALL PRESENT: CHAl R~1AN MEf\/lBERS ~1ary Jºß'''~unty Cars.~~reenfi el d .4'::-~JCÍr j 0 r i e Na s h ,~~# Å'~ #" ,~~1¡1" Warren Eckhardt ,<,'(. _:tøfß7~" Jack Kno\~l es ~ø/,;';I CI~~STAFF PRESENT: ;-><+;{ÍTv MANAGER Charles Hilliams ,~~ß BUILDING OFFICIAL Gary Caldwell .:¢. .r;i,Ø~·17 p & Z CLERK l~anda Ca Ivert .' ;ø" ,./~ CONSIDERATION OF TH,E~fVfINUTES OF APRIL 24, 19~~1~~ pt'Jø NE!~ ( ~Uly PS 80-19 This case was moved to the end of the agenda since there was no one to present the request. 1 J ~~~~~~~,~~{,~"'~~~~~",,"¿':~~~~"'~~.::."t~:Y.~~~~:n't.t'f:~"'=~~~~~~i'MJ.",~ ABSENT: The mi nutes \'Jere not approved due to the absence of enough members that were present at the April 24th n1eeting. PS 80-20 APPROVED Request of Smithfield Masonic Lodge for replat of Lot 3R) Block C, Smithfield Addn. Bob Holder came forward to represent the lodge in its request. ~/1r~. Ho 1 der s ta ted the lodge owns a pi ece of " land 100 ft. by 150 ft. that needs to be replatted into one lot so they can build a new building on it. -- ( ", Mrs. Calvert told the Commission that when she checked with the utility companies, all had no objection to this replat except South\vestern Bell. She said they "Janted to view the corrected plat before making their decision as to where they need any additional easements. Mrs. Calvert said the surveyor brought the corrected plat in today and she mailed the telephone company one. She said she would have a reply from the telephone company before this plat goes to council. "'-.,..--.,.. """""""'........~~~~~-=......,.~'''''=--'='''''".......".,''''~4~''''<.m'''-_·__·--...,...,··....7....... PS 80-21 Request of Loui s r-1cCrory for repl at of Lots . .. · APPROVED . 16Rl and 16R2, Block 2, Morgan Meadows Ad~ # Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engine~ came fOf\'a rd to represent r~1r. r"1ccr;ofý in his reques t. ../t~~~·~· p~1~~" tk. Stembri dge sa i d fk. ~1GCÇory owns a 1 a rge lot on the corner of ~jghtower and Little Ranch Road. The loj:-~·:is 200 ft. by 400 ft. He said ~1r.. McCrQ,t?Y' \~ants to divide it into two lots so h~~t~n build his Mother-in-law a house on ,th~ back. This lot will be 100 ft. by 2iOO"~'~'ft. , ~~;'.:!';'~- ~lr~:ð~~~$haunty asked t~r. Stenlbridge if he had ~~s'~en the Engineerls comments. t?"~"J.' ,,,,¿,-/ Mr. Stembridge said he had, and thought he ~ had all of them corrected, but found out ~' today that there was one item that still ~~. needs correcting. Mr. Stembridge said this ~ item would be corrected before going to ~~~ council. /' The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request. . ~ ...,. . ~' . Page 2 P & Z r',1i nutes t1ay 29, 1980 c-e ~ r (. (. \. Mrs. Calvert said that if additional ease- ments are needed) she would see that they are entered on the plat. ~ The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request. There being no one to speak regarding this request, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Greenfield moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash) to approve PS 80-20 subject to the Engineer's comments and also subject to additional ease- ments being granted to Southwestern Bell if needed. Motion carried 3-0. There being no one to speak regarding this request) the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. ~~!\-r;. .'~~~'l'IIYtf.YHlf<i~~~~,'~,~..~~~ ,f, YJI,.r;íi~.~'¡ ..".~. Ö,., ~~..l[.~¡'14PSJlJl!iIH\f4htl,""~ ,. e . June 4, 1980 City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 RE: 3-886, City of North Richland Hills, Smithfield Addition, Lot 3-R, Block C, Revised Replat Dear Sirs: . The replat of Lot 3-R, Block C, Smithfield Addition, has been revised to show Snider Street on the east side of this lot. On the north side of the' lot is a drainage right-of-way. This has been sho,vn. The plat also shows the property zoned commercial. If any additional items are needed, please let me know. Respectfully, .-,' ,,' - ;' ",./'~>/ "-<. ..,..r;'" .,- / / ¿,../ / ,¿ ".', -=~;~~~~~~Og;:'p .¿/(; Registered Public Surveyor 'T~N:bjm e e e ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort vVorth-Dallas . June 2, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-886, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, SMITHFIELD ADDITION, LOT 3R, BLOCK C, REVISED REPLAT, PS 80-20 We have reviewed the revised replat for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. County Road No. 3036 has been shown south of this lot - our records indicate that it is the street adjacent to this lot on the north side. Also Snider Street should be shown adjacent to this lot on the east side. (See item no. 6 of our review letter dated May 15, 1980). 2. With reference to item no. 6 of our May 15 letter, we would request that the current zoning, "cojTI¡nerc;alll be sho~'Ýn on the plat as suggested by the City Council. 3. Other than the minor items mentioned above, this replat appears to be in cOfflpliance with the requirements of the North Richland Hills Subdivision Ordinance. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this replat, please do not hesitate to call. ()~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ljc cc: r~r. Charles W. Williams, City f/1anager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 (, ( e KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas . May 15, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission Cit of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-886, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, SMITHFIELD ADDITION, LOT 3R, BLOCK C, REPLAT, PS 80-20 We have reviewed the replat for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We would suggest that the proposed addition named "Smithfield Masonic Lodge Additionll be changed to "Smithfield Addition" since this is a replat of the latter. Also we would further suggest that the new lot number should be 3-R. e 2. The North Richland Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that a metes and bounds description of the property be included in the Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication as well as shown on the plat layout. 3. The IIO'//ner's Certificate" as presented on this replat should incl ude a "dedi cat·¡ on" paragraph for easements, ri ghts-of-way, etc. as provided in the Subdivision Ordinance. 4. We would suggest that the Planning and Zoning Commission's endorse- ment be reworded as shown in the Ordinance: liThe Planning and Zoning Commission of North Richland Hills on (date) voted affirmatively to recommend adoption of this plat by the City Council. II 5. The addresses of the owners and surveyor should be presented on the plat. 6. Adjacent platting to the west should be shown on the plat as well as the County Road No. 3036 designation to the north and Snider Street to the east. 7. A vicinity or location map should appear on the plat. - 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 "', ,.. '''- e Planning & Zoning Commission, May 15, 1980, Page 2 . 8. The zoning for this property should be sho\~n on the plat as suggested by the Council. 9. Utility companies should be notified of the replat in accordance with City Staff procedures. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~w.~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW All j c cc: ' r~r. Thofnas Paul, City t,1anager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities e -- ., Page 2 p & Z ~1i nutes t1ay 29, 1980 - ,..---~,-..... _II ~ 1 'IH m 'J, 1IIiII!iJið,\ìJ.H¡~,¡'SI:w¡,ù1'Iif~' J -'-~,W. ~~.r,; ]lrg~~ ,ì.b.· _ _~~~.... J.l ' II 001lillfln1j\ji b1 ._ "19"" R~flli4JII'-JI' Mrs. Calvert said that if additiona~ ments are needed~ she WOUld s3~.d. se <-,~ffãt they are entered on the plat. ~. .-'.-:r~ .. The Chairman cal~r anyone wishing to speak in fa¥~f or in opposition to this reque~~~ ø~· ,ø ~~'1here being no one to speak regarding this .' request, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Greenfield moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-20 subject to the Engineer's comr.1ents and also subject to additional ease- ments being granted to Southwestern Bell if needed. Motion carried 3-0. t-e PS 80-21 APPROVED Request of Louis McCrory for replat of Lots 16Rl and 16R2, Block 2, Morgan Meadows Addn. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. McCrory in his request. (e f1r. Stembridge said r\~r. ~llcCrory o\~ns a large lot on the corner of Hightower and Little Ranch Road. The lot is 200 ft. by 400 ft. He said ~1r. McCrory \~ants to divide it into two lots so he can build his Mother-in-law a house on the back. This lot will be 100 ft. by 200 ft. Mrs. Shaunty asked Mr. Stembridge if he had seen the Engineer's comments. Mr. Stembridge said he had, and thought he had all of them corrected, but found out today that there was one item that still needs correcting. Mr. Stembridge said this item would be corrected before going to council. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in ,favor of or in opposition to this request. .. ·e ( . There being no one to speak regarding this request, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. . , & . It. Page 3 P & Z ~1i nutes ~1ay 29, 1980 (e Nl ¡U .'R --w r r1irs. Nash moved, seconded by ~'rr. Greenfi e 1 d, to approve PS 80-21 subject to the Engineer's comments~ Motion carried 3-0. . ......~~~~~~~?t'~~~~~~~...,...IIIii.....'~,~~1!:I ~__ .1. It w: Request of WPW Management Corp. for preliMinary plat of Lot 1, Block 1, College Circle Shopping Center Addition. PS 80-22 APPROVED PS 80-23 APPROVED Request of WPW Management Corp for fi~ plat of Lot 1, Block 1, College Cir~re Shopping Center Addition. ~ 9' #! Delbert Stembridge, ConsultinSlAngineer, came for~~ard to represent t.Jp~JFrl¡anagernent Corp. in their requests. /~ ., . ..Q' Mr. Stembridge said t~Ÿ5 company is located' in Houston, Texas anp7they own a strip shopping center on,(.;;êóllege Circle. He said they need to get;,jfhe proper~ty pl atted so they can 1 ease the ,,~-r-fáces out to tenants. ./!~ The Chairm~~ called for anyone wishing to speak i n_:~f:àvor of or in oppos i tion to these requestj: ' ¡Iii' 6~}:O' ~1r .~."~~ 1 an Hamm came for\~Ja rd. He sa i d he OVJns ,"'" ~µe property adjacent to this-property and ~,;';Just \'Janted to knovl if this CO!ìlpany planned .,? to bring Ross Road up to standard~ He said ,17 that when they platted the property to the t south of this property, the city required ~~ them to improve their portion of Ross Road. ~/ / Mr. Caldwell stated that this platting pro- '. cess ",as requested by t~vo former Pub 1 i c Works Directors and he wasn~t sure what they had decided' about the street. .e ( Mr. Hamm stated this company should be required to do the sanle as anyone else \'hen they come in for,platting. Mr. Caldwell said the pro rata for the street was probably overlooked by the City Engineer, and he would get with Mr, Albin right away to see what will be required of this company~ Mr. Stembridge said he felt sure that WPW Manage8ent Corp. would pôy the pro rata for the street'! ~'~1M:;t'9~~~;!!\'I'1~~~~~~.a filII" e e -- ( Delbert R. Stembridge consulting engineer June 2, 1980 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Rich1and Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: Morgan Meadows Addition, -Lots 16 R-I, and 16 R-2, Block 2, Replat, PS 80-21. As recommended by Know1ton-Eng1ish-F1owers letters of May 15, 1980, and May 27, 1980, we have made the corrections and/or additions to the plat as per their recommendations. Sincerely, DRS/let cc: Mr. C.W. Williams, City Manager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities Mr. Richard Albin, P.E. 3729 Flory. North Richland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-1363 e tit e ( \ KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas . May 27, 1980 Planning and Zoning Commission Ci'ty o'f North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject:' 3~907,CITY OF'NORTH'RICHLAND HILLS~ MORGAN 'MEADOWS ADDITION, . LOTS·16Rl . AND '16R2, . BLOCK 2, REVISED REPLAT,PS'80~21 We have reviewed the revised rep1at for the subject subdivision and offer the' fo 11 owi.ng cOITDlJent: ~lewoul d refer you to comnlent number 2 of our review letter dated May15~ 1980. Page 20.of the North Richland Hills Subdivision Ordinance indicates that a metes and bounds description of the property should be included on the plat. The lot dimensions have been shown'on this plat but the bearings have not been included. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. RÞ1A:bvg cc: 'Mr. Charles W. Wìlliams,'City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utiltties 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 e 1. 2. It 3. 4. 5. I, \ KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENG INEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas . r~ay 15, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-907, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, r~ORGAN MEADO~vS ADDN., LOTS 16Rl and 16R2, BLOCK 2, REPLAT, PS 80-21 We have reviewed the replat for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: An Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication should appear on the replat along with the proper notarization. The North Richland Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that a metes and bounds description of the property be included in the Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication as well as shown on the plat layout. The Owner's and Surveyor's addresses should also appear on the replat. The zoning for this property should appear on the plat as suggested by the City Council (IF-12). If a structure on Lot 16Rl is proposed to front on Hightower Road, then a minimum 3D-foot building line is required on this lot as well as a side yard minimum of 30 feet on Lot 16R2. (See Article XIII, Section III, Paragraph 2, page 45, of the Zoning Ordinance). 6. Hightower Road should be labeled Co. Rd. 3066 rather than 3036 as shown. 7. Utility companies should be notified of the replat in accordance with City Staff procedures. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~t~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. -- RvJA/ljc cc: f71r. Thomas Paul, Ci ty r'1anager r~ r. Ga r y Ca 1 d \'e 11, B u i 1 din 9 0 f fie i a 1 Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities sso FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 :.f ." ! e ¿ ~ . Page 3 P & Z Minutes ~1ay 29, 1980 ( V l~.. ~ ~ T ~V" ~1 iii.... .~~~..-..ø;~.'-V-~ '_____~_:_..:~- =- '" ~~~:-: a.. r"lrs. Nash moved, secondeÄ.j}~.~1'e~i)~r leÎô, _.to-a.~t"e·t'e····P'~hj ect to the E ng i nee r ' s ~~~~-~~:~~,~~~..~..~~3-0~ ~~-....,------ - -- -- .. ~'I- W-1 ~ ---';:p:J1/ PS 80-22 Request of WPW Management Corp. for APPROVED prelir.1inary plat of Lot 1, Block I, College Circle Shopping Center Addition. --q =-~-= PS 80-23 APPROVED . ,Request of WPW Management Corp for final plat of Lot I, Block 1, College Circle Shopping Center Addition. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward to represent WPH Management Corp. in their requests. Mr. Stembridge said this company is located in Houston, Texas and they own a strip shopping center on College Circle. He said they need to get the property platted so they can lease the spaces out to tenants. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to these requests~ r11r. ,l\lan Ha!nm came for\~Jard~ He said he ov¡ns the property adjacent to this property and just wanted to know if this company planned to bring Ross Road up to standard. He said tha t \~hen they pl atted the property to the south of this property) the city required them to improve their portion of Ross Road. Mr. Caldwell stated that this platting pro- . cess was requested bytl~O former Public Works Directors and he wasn~t sure what they had decided' about the street. Mr. Hamm stated this company should be required to do the same as anyone else when they come in for platting. Mr. Caldwell said the pro rata for the street \'/aS probably overlooked by the Ci ty Engi neer, and he would get with Mr. Albin right away to see what will be required of this company~ Mr. Stembridge said he felt sure that WPW' Manage~ent Corp. would pay the pro rata for the street~ ~1rs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Greenfield, to approve PS 80-23 subject to the Engineer's comments and also subject to the payment of pro ratas and the problem of Ross Road being resolved. Motion carried 3-0. .'''OW----.-...... '~...i'i'.....- --,' - -....·.......---...iT ........ ¥ L··..~ . ,'.........-.. ;¡-,-..... ~ ~"""-' __ --- ... - . "111 ,_. .1"". h ..AI) PZ 80-17 Request of Carl Magar to rezone Lot 7~ Blo~ APPROVED. 3 ~ Hewitt Estates ~ from its present cl a;.~ fication of Agriculture to a prop~s.ed-~'h1assi- fication of IF-9-0ne Family D~"elli.. ,.~ This property is located on the~ uth side of . He\'Jitt Street, app}~oximatelY.j}T feet VJest of where Hewitt Street turns ~~om its northerly direction to its \A/esterl~direction.. Carl ~1agar came fqJW~. He stated he was requesting the.føtíing be changed fron) Agri- cu~ture to ~. si·"'le f.arnilY~lF-9 ~o he co~ld bUlld a h~ on the property In questlon~ ;-..{ .. . Page 4 P & Z Minutes t1ay 29, 1980 ·e ~ r .-- ~ \ I . I \ The Chairman called for anyone else wishing to speakÞ There being no one else to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Greenfield moved, seconded by Mrs: Nash, to approve PS 80-22 subject to the Engineer's comments and also subject to the paynlent of pro ratas and the prahl em of Ross Road being resolved. Motion carried 3-0. Mrs. lvert told the Commission that some o his area has had houses built on the land everalyears ago without the zoning being changed. Mrs. Shaunty stated that ¡F-9 zoning required a 9000 sq. ft. lot and 1300 sq. ft. house. She asked r1r. Magar if he \~as in agreement ~Jith this. Mr. Magar stated he was. The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request. There being no one to speak regarding this request, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. , -~~:f J'~~~JIi""~ ~\~r_~,.~_T.:i,~..l.~ ~~~!'iit~",~W:~~,\\fíJ!l~~J '~"};¡)J''' WI'li!Ji!IlQ R6W!1icY e . l \ \ - Delbert R. Stembridge consulting engineer June 2, 1980 .. Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.Eo Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: College Circle Shopping Center, Lot 1, Block 1, Preliminary and Final Plat, PS 80-22, 23. In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letters of May 15, 1980 and May 30, 1980, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, we offer the following comments: 1. The plat has been corrected to read Ross Road instead of Ross Sto as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. The Owner would prefer to close Ross Road and grant an easement for the water lines. However, should the city choose not to close the road, the Owner would agree to a letter of covenant to pay his pro rata share of the street improvements at such time as the improvements are made 0 Sincerely, PoEo DRS/1et cc: Mr. C.W. Williams, City Manager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities Mr. Richard Albin, P.E. 3729 Flory. North Richland Hills. 76118 . (817) 284-1363 e . - / { (, KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas . May 30, 1980 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 73Q1 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-864~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, COLLEGE CIRCLE SHOPPING CENTER, ·LOTl,BLOCK'l,PRELIMINARY'AND FINAL PLAT, PS'80-22, 23 We have reviewed the preliminary and final plat for the subject subdivision and offer the following comment: In addit;'on to our comments by letter dqted May 15, 1980, we would suggest that you may wish to consider the closing of Ross Road due to traffic problems created by ingress and egress to Davis Blvd. If the street is not closed then you may wish to have the Developer escrow his pro rata share of future street improvements on Ross Road or have him agree to sign a covenant for participation in the construction costs at such time that street improvements are made, If the street is closed, then an eqsement will need to be retained for the water lines exìsting in this street. Should you have any questions concerni,ng the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitqte to call. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA:bvg cc: 'Mr. Charles W. Williams,'City Man~ger Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 I' I , \ e KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas May 15, 1980 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-864, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, COLLEGE CIRCLE SHOPPING CENTER, LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT, PS 80-22, 23 ~~e have reviewed the prel iminary and final plat for the subject subdivision and offer the following comment: 1. The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication for the plat should be fully executed and notarized. ,. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please do not hesitate to call. ~.££J. f2tL~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R\~ A/l j c cc: Mr. Thomas Paul, City Manager Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities -- 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 e -- e ___;- I IS- City of ~rth RichJand Hills, Texas ~~~" ~ . I ' I ! . MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Counci 1 ~1embers FROM: C~arles w. Williams ~~ Clty Manager ~~ June 2, 1980 DATE: SUBJECT: County Fire Protection Contract As so indicated by Chief Gertz's cover letter, there are many manpower and money problems surrounding this contract should it be approved. Therefore, I also recommend the City of North Richland Hills not enter into this contract submitted by the Tarrant County Commissioner's Court. For documentation, the following cities have voted as follows: NO YES 1. Bedford 2. Hurst 3. Richland Hills 4. Haltom City 1. Euless 2. Grapevine 3. ~Jatauga (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 · - .. '--.. .. e e -- /0 City of JX6rth Richland Hills, Texas FIRE DEPARTMENT Stan R. Gertz Fire Chief -' " .. Memo to: Mr. Tom Paul City Manager From: Stan R. Gertz Fire Chief Date: March 26, 1980 Subject: County Fire Protection Contracts Attached are proposed county contracts, whick in short will place a burden on our tax payers in providing fire protection, arson investigators and ambulance service for little or no reimbursement in answering calls in un-incorporated areas in the county. This contract also will not reimburse this city for any chemicals used in combating fires or for damage to any fire apparatus. The City of North Richland Hills presently has two (2) "Mutual Aid Agreementsl: \vith cities in the N.E. sector of Tarrant County. The Mutual Aid Agreement addresses both fire protection and ambulance service. This agreement provides more than adequate manpower and equipment needed in most any type of emergency. (817) 281-0041 4101 MORGAN CIRCLE P. O. BOX 13305 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 e Presently the City of North Richland Hills is surrounded by incorporated cities. If the fire department is requested, we must run through another city or cities to answer ~ call in the county. I recommend the City of North Richland Hills not sign this contract submitted by the Tarrant County Commissioner's Court. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me. You~ruly, ~~-; ;rk,l_, I ~., ,/ :".: .0/ v1f(V.¡/') 't' ~r- S'tan R. Gertz , Fire Chief e ms e )~~~:--~'~ '·{<Ia'D'· I ~~ ~~ ~-' ~:; ~ \ c: ~ Ar:Jr~ 1 1930 ,.. ! ~~ ; !'.~ ~1 &, ¡-" ~ f:' f) vI i J ¡:h,;'.1H*'\..J~-.\ e e e RAY 'REYNOLDS Fi re Marsh al TARRANT COUNTY FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76106 900 N. COMMERCE (817) 334-1462 . ~1arch 21, 1980 . TO: A ITENTI Q\l : SUBJECT: Tarrant County Fire Departments Chief COI.NlY CQ~TMcrS Attached please find 3 copies of the 1980 County Fire Protection Contracts, which have an Exhibit "A" attached to it. Also, an attaduænt letter from the County Fire Marshal - Rules & Reporting RequireJœnts. These contracts should be kept intact as received. All 3 copies need to be signed and all 3 copies returned to this office. After they have been signed by Comnissioners' Court we will forward you a copy for your file. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sil1ccroly" i/§:s/K- Fire Marshal RR:es Attacrünen ts \,.i Tllr~ s'rA'!'}; OF 'rUXAS I cou N1'Y 0 I; 'r^I{Iù\ì~'r I TIllS· CON1~IlAC]' A}JIJ AGltEEr~tENT Jua(lc ~l11à entered into b)' alld :bct};Jccn tllC COllnty of l"arr~lJlt ¿lI1Ò State of Texas acting 11crcin l)y ¿lI1d tJ1 roug}1 i ts C()nun is s ioncr s' COtlr t) IIC rc in,ll~ tc r referred to as COUNTY. and the City of NQrth Richl<lnd "ills , Tcxa 5, a ~funic ipa 1 Corpora t ion, .acting by a11d through its \Iayor) Jlereinaftcr referred to as CITY: .... 1\'ITNESSETII: The above named CITY l1as a full time professional fire dc})artJnent and has by resolution of its Ci ty Council authorized ..a contract bet\'e'ecn saicl CITY al1d COUNTY for fire protection service to real and personal property located outside of the boundries ~of said CITY and \'lithin such distances as the fire department ûf said CITY may reasonably be expected to reach and render service ·in case of fire, which service it hereby agrees to provide under t:1).e terms of this Contract, and said COUNTY hereby agrees to pay ~n accordance with the method of distribution and pa~ent set ,/£orth in 0~~~þit uA", attached hereto, to said CITY for the providing ;,... ~of such services to the unincorporated areas of the COUNTY. ..IT 15 AGREED AND Ul\TDERSTOOD that the CITY' 5 primary obligation lies to those residents who live within its O\~l boundries and ~e CITY assumes no liability under this Contract for damages ~o real or personal property by reason of delay in response or £ailure to respond to any particular call for its services. ~T IS SPECIFICALLY UNDERSTOOD by both parties hereto that ~nno event shall the COUNTY be obligated to payout a sum totaling ~n excess of the amount budgeted by COU~7Y for fire protection ~eTVice to the unincorporated ~reas, the amount so budgeted for ':the year 1980 being the sum of One Hundred T\.¡enty Thousand and -:no one 11undreds ($120, 000.00) dollars. ·COUnTY shall be under no obl iga tion 'vi th respect to providing fire fighting equipment or any other expense incidcntal to the ..caTrying ·out of this Contract, ~md shall have no right, titlc, ''Ûr interest in and to 1:hc fire fighting equipment belonging to CITY. - e e ,,.; \0=\ -. ..", ......., ... e This Contract s}lal1 1)0 in force and effect for one YCtlr, bcgil1TliI1g Dccember 1, 1979, 31Id cndiJlg November 30, 1980, 3Ild LIle' payrncnts to be Jna,Ic to the participating fire dcpartnlcnts íor fire protection service rendered under this Contract shall ./ be allocated, "as per t}lC attached formula, for tIle months of .~~ \t"'\ \ ~'.... t December, 1979 through November, 1980. . The funds to be paid by said COUNTY for the fire fighting services of such CITY outside of the limits of such CITY'shal1 he paid out of the general fund of TARRANT COUNTY, and shall be paid to the CITY as provided in the attached Exhibit "A". Whenever the CITY or fire department above is responding ~o ,a call outside of the city limits of the CITY or the normal e jurisdictional limits of the fire department, as the case may /be~ it shall operate under the fire code which is in effect within / . ~,the city limits of such CITY or fire department. ,\() ~ t . ~ Any fire marshalls, investigators, or other arson personnel ~wh.o respond from TARRANT COUNTY to a fire scene 'v]lich is under ~he control of a CITY or fire department named herein, whether :~ithin or without the city limits, shall be governed by the fire "code of the CITY within whose limits the fire department normally ,'~pera t e 5 . The parties hereto further agree that the COUNTY will pay ~o CITY at a rate of not to exceed Twenty Five Dollars ($25.00) ø·.ç ............-..·:for emergency ambulance service to the area for which fire service ~sherein provided for. The COUNTY has, for the year 1980, budgeted ·:~t:he sum of T\velve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) for such ambulance :service to t}1e unincorpora tcd areas of TAf~RANT COUNTY \A¡hich sum ~hall be paid to the participatiIìg CITIES on a per r'espol1se fractional ·basis in the event there are more of Four Hundred Eighty qualifying -enlergcnc yo aJnblllanc e call s m[tde to UI1 incOrl)Ora tcd a yeas of l'ARRANT ;.cOUNTY during the year 1980. In no event shall the payment per 'response exceed $25.00 nor shall tI1C cllnll11ative I>ayn1cl1ts rnade -£oremergenc)' ambulance service. to the. unincorpora ted areas ~xceec1 the budgeted slim of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00). ..2- ....." ~...'- "'¡'ta:'~.......-.... .oI¡,....eN.. .........."... ,.,~ ."........ .. ~ e -Emcrr,cnc y ¡lm~>ul ancc res ponse s en tit 1 ed to re imbu rs elllen t unde r :this Contract sllall consist of those responses made to calls for emergency ambulance service to the CITY as well as responses to fire department emergency calls which result in the ambulance or rescue unit being utilized to make an emergency ambulance run to a hospital or a clinic for the purpose of transporting .a person in need of Jncdical attention. The payment',provided for in connection with fire responses .. ...and emergency ambulance service shall be in accordance Hith rules and reporting requirements promulgated by the Tarrrant County Fire Marshal and shall be limited to those fire responses and oemergency ambulance service calls that are certified to as being e ~ualifying by the appropriate police department~ fire department or sheriff's department personnel~ 1QITNESS TIŒ SIGNATURES of the respective parties hereto :this the day of , 19 TARRANT COUNTY, acting by and -:through its Comnlissioners 1 COllrt :BY: },1IKE l'w'10NCRIEF ..County Judge k. To ANDERSON ;Commissioner Precinct Number One e ~. L. ~IEBUS -Commissioner Precinct Number Two A. L YN (;I~EGOR)' .coffinlissioncr Precinct Number Three -n . D . Glm;rrn CornmissioI1CI' Precinct Number Four - 3.. -.... ...~...............~"1.......~___.....,..,__...,~< ........ ~ ~ e CI1~Y 01-: NOR]~fI l~I (:JIL^r~D III LLS DY: f-Jayor AITEST: .. City Secretary e e -4- · -- "'--, -- ,~-- ,,- ',-,"W, -.-'-. "-~' .. - , --y-<,~ "".., .-., ',-"',,,,,, .. '-'-"" ~ ,"-->-,'- ..>. ',- _ ",-. .~ ,,,- _,',.~ '._ "_ _._ c-- "~,...,_ _..,...,., '. _ . __..,. ,0 "",.., -...... _"."" ',"",'~~. '_.~~.' "". _,'. """ __ ~ "-0""", ,,,~ ...... ..~......... IJ X f I J B I'f " ^ II e The dï'stribution or allocation of the funùs budgeted by the County of Tarrant for fire protection in the unincorporated areas 'Of the County shall be calculated or deterrined as follows: From the total sum budgeted by Tarrant County for unincorp- orated area fire protection shall first be deducted the sum of ~e_~"the payments made equal to 2.5 % of said County budget which is ~ ~o be paid to the six (6) unincorporated area volunteer fire ¿epartments immediately upon the execution of this contract. Thc total sum budgeted by County shall be divided by the ~ota1 number of fire responses made by all contracting fire ¿epartments to determine the per response allocation chargable 3gainst the unincorporated area voluntcer fire departments e Tcceiving lump sum payments. This per response allocation shall then be dividcd into the lump sum payment to determine the numbcr of calls laade by unincorporated voluntecr. fire ··departmen ts which are covered by the lump sum payment, before such unincorporated volunteer fire departments are entitled to share in the balance of the County's budgeted amount. The balance, after deduction of the total of the lump sum paymcnts paid to the unincorporated volunteer fire departments, Tcmaining of the total sum budgeted by the County shall then be e divided by the total number of unincorporatcd area fire responscs ·-nade by departments not receiving lump sum payments plus the total ·Ðf responses made by unincorporated a~a volunteer fire departments ån excess of the number covered by the lump sum payments to -~etermine the per response allocation, if any, to be paid to each ~participating fire department a t the end of the year. This method of calculating the amount paid to the various fire departments in Tarrant County for unincorporated area fire -'Call 1·cspons..cs can be expressed by the following formula: J\ Sum budgcted by Tarrant County for unincorporated area ·fire I)rotcc tiOll; .B Total of lump sum payments made to unincorporated area ·volunteer fire departmcnts, 6x (2.5% of A); A-BÞ C Balance remaining to he distributed upon a per response basis to all participating fire departments; -. ,.,., '" ~ ,.,. "c- .. .,.,. . ... ,. ".. ,*",,..... .., . ... ..'-... . .. .'. . ...~ '.,v.,~. .,,~ -.'.,.-..,.. ,,..,..,... ~". _..,.. <. .,' ~.... '.1"..... ~~ _ ,<__-..'. ,..~~...... .. __.~. . D · Total re5ponses IIlLldc by participating fire Jept1rtments t:o.unincorporatcd areas of Tarrant County; e 'A ]}aE Pcr response allocation [or determining number of responses ,Cove red 1) y 1 UIHI> stun pa )'n1C J1 t ; 2..5% A E a::F No. of rc spans e s by each un i ncorpora te d vo lun tee r fire .departments covered by lump sum payment; (; Total nUr.1ber or responses made to unincorporated areas by each unincorporated area volunteer fire department; .. G-I~=H Number of responses to be paid for over number covered by lump sum 'payments to unincorporated voluntcer fire -depa rtrnen ts ; J Numbcr of responses made to unincorporatcd arcas by fire ·~epartments not receiving lump sum payments; C II + J = K Per response allocation to be paid to all departments at year's end. e ~ or KxJ=Amount to be paid at year end to each department. e .,: Exh i 1) i t -t'A" - Pag c T,.¡o . e ........ .'~' (.C \I' .\' /-.. "~ ~-...). .. ... ..'.. ~'\ ·f' -Co.' ¡.¡." ,~.. . .,~. ; '- ~~ .~. :{,. (\1' , " . . ,: \. '~ /;. · (.. )l~,~1/. (.' ::.. : ..~.. ~. r\. lA. '\ !.'1 : · \. ~O ~ '.\ f ~''': " I, '\. :,.~r, ~ \\/ ~':i .- I. ., ~(.hî, -' .' I . .. . ", . . . .... ........ HAY HEYN()LI>S Fin' !\1¡H~ha' 1-'AIlI{I\NT CO UNrry FOnT \'/OHTII. TF; XAS 76106 900 N. C()t\11\IEHCE , (817) 3:Jlf-l¡JG2 SUBJECT: R£lLES & REPORn}JG REQUIRE/.ŒNTS FOR - A EI.{ERGEIJCY FIRE & A!.lßULAlJCE RESPO¡VSES The 60.t.e.ooJ.Ú19 hI 6 OJtma-ti.o tt .[6 plto v.ide d i,t Itegtvaú ~O ~he 1tu..l.e..6 rot d ltep o!c.-tútg lteq WLemen-t6 6 OIL [meJtgenc.y F -Úœ.. rotd AJrhLLtanC.e. 1te6 pon6 e..6 . 1. FIP£ RESPONSE. "Whene.veJl.. 61Jt.e equ1.pmen.t JuMpond6 t:.o (1.JHJ emVtgenc.y c.a.U :to :the ëOU1t.ty MeM .u:. ¿,htt.U. be da.uifr{.e.d M a (þte ptr.otecüon ILUpon6e EXCEPT -ÚI .tJ~ 60Ucxaútg c.a..ð e.& : ,. Ambulance .tlJpe ~¡)on.6 U . 2. Re.6pon~e.4 -to btcoJtrJoJuLt.ed tVtea.. 3. 4. Con-tJtoUed bwuwtg .6.taJtd-by.6. Re.quu.ted ¿,.tand-by¿, whe.lt an e.meJtgenc.y doe.¿, not:. 0 c.c.wr. duJÚn 9 .the .6.tan d - by. " e II · EMERGENCY AMBUL/WCE RESPCNSE. Ntf}:tÁ.me. an arrhu.f.anc.e ltec.úvu a c.al.t 60/t emeILgeJtc.y ~eltv.lc.e and make.¿, that 1tWl., .tJÚ-6 14 c.on1:.idVte.d an emeJtgenclj ambu.lanc.e /tun. 1. When an ambul.anc.e ac.c.ompOJÚe.6 .tJte F.úte. Vepa.Jr;b¡Jen.t (tr.Upond6 w.l.tJ¡J on a c..a.tt .tJút:, .u NOT c.onð.ú1eAe.d (1.JI eInVLgenc.y (1.JTbultmc.e /tehpOI1..6e. 16, hcweve.lt, a6.teJt. aJcJÚ.ving-oñ .the ¿'c.ene, :the. arrbui..a.Jtc..e ma.ke¿, rot emvr.genc.y !tUn W a ho¿,pLt.a..e Olr. cLút.ic., .then .tJw..t woCLU be c.on.&i.deJted an emVLge.ncy ambulanc.e ltUn. 2. (lJhen a Ruc.ue. Unit Jtwtb wUit :tlte EÚLe. VepM..:tmen.t .to :tlte .6œne 06 an emeJLgeJtCJj tJú.ð M NOT c.ot'.JJ..dvæd OJt e.mvr..genclj oJrhuR.a.n.ce t:.e.ópon6e even .[6 .the Rehc.u.e UnLt. . a.dmú¡,ÚdVll:. aid, bu..t i6 .the Re¿,c.ue Un-U acå .w .the c.a.paci.ty 06 an Arrbutal1ce., tJza:t .¿¿, .i;(: ma.k..e.6 an emeJLgmc.y Ju1rt W a hObp..{;ta.t OJt a c...U.n.ic., :then tltat wotd.d be c.oiU.i..d- cited an. emeJLgeJ1.ey an6u.lOJlc.e /tWt. I II. The ItMpOil.6e 6oJur16 U6ed 601t c.eJLt<-6Y·.[J19 Coun.tLj F.i..M. and Ambcd.anc.e Jte6ponóe..6 a.Jr..e plle6 en:tf. y bUng 6u,'m..f..l> hed t:.o yo Ull. F-úr..e. Ve.pivLtmen.t by my 0 Hic.e.. When adcLi.ûo na..t Jr..ep 0Jr...t 60r...,~ Me needed bimpty cnn.t.a.c.t my oMJ..c.e. and :they w.i..U be ¿,en.t. t:.o you. Thue Jte.6pon.óe. tr.epoJr...t 60JUn& need .to be. fr{..U..ed ou..t. and ¿,en;(: .to my 06 6ic.e pJÚ.OJt .to :the 1 O:th 06 :the. noUow- lng month .to be e.U..g..iJ;¡ie 60IL .the end 06 :t.he ljeaJt pa.Ljme.n:t:.6. I V. The Emvc.genc.y AmbLLtanc.e. SeJc.vi..c.u 601t wfúch. pa.Ljme.n.t .6ha..U. be made. :to unbtc.ollpoJr..a.:.t1!.d aJl.eM 06 .the Cowt.:ty aIU!.. .tJw6e ¿,eJtv..[c.e.õ which. a.Jr..e Pllovide.d by yOWL cU:.y Olt c.oml1wtil.tj .to W Jæ-6J.. den;t6 · Tit e oni..tj Jr.eq UÚte. In ent:. my 0 6 6i c.e tuU.l nee d .ú .to It a v e .the Jr..e.6 pO n.ó e c.vr...ti. 6..i..e. d a.6 an em eJtg eJt(~..tj by ha.. v.i.ng a P o.uc.e O/t EÚLe. 066ic.eJr.. .6.[gl1 t:.he. eapy 0 6 .the /i.C'A p OM e ltepalLt tJzat ~ ~ent .to my 066ic.e.. Sin c,eJte~1j , - r!j? ~£ - 67 rr;ytt~ COWWj F~ l.{lVL~ha.t I. RR : e.& ...........""""'~.-'"_.__.-..__. .,.,.,..,--~--~. ...~~"""'.....".,,-~~. ~-.,....,..~"""""",,,,,,~~. .?,,,,,,,,, v·...~. . . -.,'. . -!.....,,...'-~~._ ~........,,"""" ,.... /6 e ORDIftl\NCE NO. BE IT ORD1\IrJED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1 . t· That certain public streets in this city heretofore, be known as State Highv!ay 121 (Grapevine High\o'~ay), running from the Haltom City City limits to the Col1eyville City limits, shall hereafter be known and designated as State Highway 26. 2. All ordinances and resolutions of this City that designates such highway as State Highway 121 or Grapevine Highway are here~ amended ans such designation is here~ changed to State Highway 26. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1980. e APPROVED: Dick Faram, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Moore, City Secretary AS TO FORiV1 AtJ D LEGAL I TV : Rex McEntire, City Attorney e PI e J~,',.''f: , ~ , ~, ~""""'"....."..',~ , . .' ~'.'f. NORTH HILLS MAt,,,,·,f,f· " >, I. J:'~è"..;~. ,.,. .'..... '.'" '~-. ":.1 '. - ." '-. ,: _ ''-1" . ~~ /~'~" ~.~, 7624 Grape~ineHighway North Richland Hilts. Texas 761 t 8 (all) 589-2236 .. ~.1ay 13, 1980 Mr. Thomas Paul, City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Tom: e I would like to express my thanks to the North Richland Hills City Council for considering my request for a change in the "Specific Use Ordinance" last night. At this time I would like to make a formal pr~sentation to the council on June 9, 1980. I would appreciate if you could include me on the agenda that evening. I will have a professionally done rendering of our proposed billboard to show to the council that night. Thank you for your continued coop or at ion and I look forward to meeting with you in the future. Best r~3>ds, /" ;' /.,,~~ ./ ," ./' ~,.." .// ·Ron Weller, C.S.M. General 1!anager RW/kl cc: file e R~CGr/Ej) IV·····. ~ '( 1 I 11""· n ...... _ .' -'''':, , L1 1I..'j ;..'1; J. .. ~r\ . -' ..J'J A Project of Federated Stores Realty, Inc. crr( MA,~Ji\(:;~:1 e e e ,'~- I , A /11(} /! ~~~Ov~ 7624 Grapevine Hi~tí~y North Richland Hills, Te~761 18 (817) 589-7~3rj , . ~~\r---"~~'" "~cc:::¡. I ", ';,: :;' ~. ,."....,., , ~" ~.,..,: ~" ·~~i,,;:, '.: · N";it: ~ "~O';~ \~, R( ,> T··~ H(; :',' H:~, I~ L~ LS I .~~.' :. : <;, \ ~': ,\'. (~ ,'~';" " ..~, Pi...' ?"IALL ..~', '. ,." . '... ""'~ {, "..'.~ ,~. -~- L ~. , ,-, . . \:'~ r- /' '-..0: t : ~it:~:.:~~~~' ~ ~~::'~¡~~.~~:,;, .. April 28, 1980 Mr. Thomas Paul, City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Tom: This letter will confirm our conversation in your office last Friday morning, concerning my request for a change in the "specific use" ordinance. As I explained, we are having a very difficult time edu- cating the public as to how to reach the center. The main thrust of our efforts are being concentrated in billboards, newspaper and radio. We feel that a key area for us is on Loop ,820 eastbound heading towards the mall. At the present time, National 3-M Advertising has billboards on the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and 820 access road. Only two sides of the billboards are presently in use, advertising local residential builders. The two sides facing eastbound traffic are blank. Our plan at this time is to merely direct the public to the mall, by placing the following type wording on the board: HEAD FOR THE HILLS NORTH HILLS MALL EXIT, AT BUSINESS 121, THEN TURN RIGHT This will be done very professionally, and in excellent taste. It should not offend anyone, and should create interest which will definitely increase our traffic in the center. Tom, I would appreciate the council's consideration on this matter. I will do anything possible to make our problem known to the city officials. Your assistance would be most appreciated. Best RegáQ ~, //, //,'~. . . ¿?)'/{/t . ¡Ron Weller, C.S.M. II General 11anager I ------ R ~ ,'-'r- :I~,"r ':'D ,..1 ,"-' ,,"'.. t ~I ;:- ~ . "")~~__. '1 ~- cc: John R. Plunkett Mark Johnson-National 3-M Adv. . f'1o. PrOject of'fedêrateâ Stores Realty. Inc. CITY MANAGER ^DQ "4 C 'QQQ ~~I .,"/ 1...J tJ I~A tl¡=-I-;;~-~!?':_~~~?-!F 0: N:' ~~ LL.~ c ~...\.. , ...\.. .),., -\. ~ c;;r' ~ J.:..' ..,.. ~ ::::'''' ...~ (:) .;.., (, '-J () ~ (:) ;:"(:) I (:)." lu ~ --r TYPE OF USE ~ >;j ~ ~.;. ~.;z. .:::j'~ ~ ~ 0 ~ C~ 0 (Ç' "",9 (':::, I ~ ... '"'" ~. ......... ..~- " '" ':?' -'- ~ ~ " " .... (.:5 ~ 'J (l~ i¡! v 4..~" 4.: ~ ~ -.J ~ ~ ....., . /~ '? ~.. ~_J . ,. t;j , l.. '"'..J , ,-....) , l,-.J 0 ~ '" t" cS- i:."" ~ -2 ~ ~;;;: V O· <J (J <) Q"~ ð Q i::Q .:j <.; ~/ ~ " G ;.r Q."" C"~ I I· ~ . .. .:~. ~...::~ ,¡, ',.; ..,L -:,{ -"J>'>~:~-~l ---¡' :'.';-~ I l~,¥}gh~j r:'ti:{:~f~j:~~~:í1~f:~~ ~ ~ f A."£E J L I 1: ~:;-;::~:~~,·:t·~,~~~,\~ :,~ ~ f·:; :(~L~~~:~:l,':~::; ~~;:;;'t ;;..~..:::t'ltC:... & ~ï:.ÞÅl~ SHY C2S}! ~'~ . ::.::.;....:.:: t··'··:' :¡:__l..: ');. .~,;- ~) t.;~~~1 1.1-0 CLEM:hG ,". ::;) !:::~ - ~fN t c¿ Al,'T~ T f!; ( 'Z.1 ) " ~ I I I 1 ~':~~;~¡~fJi!J~!l¡:~~r'r:;i~i;~.I!~;~! · rl;:':~~~1 :':":' :'~:~t,~;" '.... t '::';: ~~. t:~::::t t,··>· ¡ I I [,,< .:: ' ~_.~ ·":::'~~-~~'-'I~.'- ~: ':' :,:, :':i_,: f,: ..,. :.> : t·~-:j ~ ;~; :~': ;,: ':__\:~~ <'. >. ::; ~.,. '··E~;;· r":' ':-'/ ': : ~ ':";. : :~l ~.:: ',,~:, :,'.t- ': :.....::,_." 'I ,.". : '~':: . ""~.'.;<:> .- f<.~';'· .>: :=J ;~\,~~:;' ~,l .... ":. .. ~I . {;;::~r:):~::.:,:1 . .. ,. --L.....-_..:.___~' '~ , '~ , . . I - f~· s -I-¡:·i·.~r;.:, ì~::.:~·;~: ~ ~.:~~,:7::! ,,:,-:.:} :,:-:T"::·'~~:.: f~~~:~; .' f~:t:;~~. ~~;.:o~/;li t :1:~1~;~ I " . .,,',,- '·"1"· ',' :'=''':'~ è:~~;~:r ;~:~{z.Hi " Ft', ó,:- .I~.. ~,~ - :.:;( f{;ic~~~~::- !t:;t;7:;:: t k~;~~;,~1;\~~;}1 (: ;;~·;W .ii~~¿~¿nrt lj·~T h-~~:t~~ . 1 k·~: ::~::~.'.. r<:' :'~ ",':-j _LiV¿JW :.":~': ,'. j ~~ ;l'~'''- '.:::: -1'-",. ':' -:':':~1 S . t >.:, - -:: 'r r.,,"~'::i:·~~~_ _ '~" '. ': ~' f· '.-:'.: ,-;. .' . t I Œ=l" .; ...' f ,. . :..':'" ',' '-. S ' .- ....." ~'-'. '~."-:"-Ö:. "; -r-L-r~ ':~'. r~;:~::-~ I . _LS~-':~·'~~~~;··'·r/;:;~ e O( e /e \ I ~"tt~ ~ .~ Jot; ~CGP~. S r,\ 1 J c.~!ì't .. ¡: Œ! u: T T ~ s".;c..~ ·W o > J~ ;~.~ I~ ,~ 1::.J ~:;1 f\;..\ ~'t ~\1j ~~~ ~ PÁ~~ Ci"f ,':.¿5. FRa:E$S~c-."4.\L ~) AtJ.¡:Ht SmA TI w"Ë ~;~\P~kT Alna;r ~I'f-J ~ S£.1'1IŒ ~,Er l. ~ L STŒ"£S .., Ù $: t.J?S .>--rsq I ~ CCCJS fC-l ~~U \2$) ....,.. '...:.- $ Î vS F.::t :-Z i ~'J(;~-oj.. ;'ET" 1\.. (~) s-r...t)tO FC:) P¡-(¡~C~;' ;..:~:.:;, C a).1'4 at ~~1T t S r srl".'CIQ F:'1 ;t:~HQ (;1 ¡:..LEY t $ J:::-~ (~) e.l ~;~y A).J'J cc:-:.~£~r i CN~~ ~-1"¿RC t ~ ~..E $.1L£ e:~~ Å~~ ~~-tT~5.~ ....,,-.... (.I"')':. J. ..."tI . ~.. .~ .Ji . ' t"-v~...t;'tG ~:-~ lj) k·.J I~ I~ iª å e I~ ¡5 t:J H.D I ~ ~..4 T::::H Ä.. ~ ".LES c.u t ~T C1' ~STC'....?Y ~ C!..!M. ~ .J.....o CYr I ~ PUJolT c>~..?C «.-t ( 31 ) ~1!'tG N...."';" CJ..=ð'f1 ..'£ SÅ-~ (NJ ~ $?ZCI.\L £~Hp· l-'E:ffr J (31) ~ìP..\CT~ ~ þ,~ $~!Cl 't.t.~ ~~ 1::.Al. .A....~~TS , '~L~) . - o ~J9~tAL .t..>V.Æ~T~ U (Q;'¡"~.:q) (32 j ~ '£ E w..Lt.. f'\~' C. t ~I"~ ..I~ R€3T¡\~Á'lr ~a""'E- Iii THliAT~ Ð.tì t Ni. ~'TJ ..c ~ F.Z?~~;UhG I II I LI I r- I ' -LI." I I I -, -'-r- l___I.~ - I I I I I I -- I I I I r1~1 ~t t± I -, I I , , LL~ ~ . . , I T .1 I . ; , -17- ( e " e e .J .) that \~i 11 \'lho 11y fi t between the Front, (s tr'eet side) prop~rty 1 i ne and the Rear ~ (oPPo'site side) property lin2 of anjl platted lot. 41. Shall mean factor·yauthorized sale of ne~ aqtos) trucks~ and/o·r trailels~ \·lith motorhorr:~s, t'~'a\}21 trailers) tent tj--ailers and rrtabil t- homes included) \"Jith adjacent used saies and r'2pair. 42. Shall mean sale of used autos~ trucks. and/or trailer5~ with motorhcmes) travel trailers, tent trailers and mobil homes included~ with adjacent repa i r Ii: 43.. Shall mean all types of off-preniiss advertising signs whether fixed or portable. Non-conforrning signs shall be inlpounded and removed. f\RTICLE VII FLOOD PLAIN PREFIX Section I. To provide for the appropriate use of land which has a history of inundation or ;s determined to be subject to flood hazard and to pron-:ote th2 health, safety and gen2ral welfare of the co!nmunity, portions of certain districts and designated \'ith a Flood Plain Prefix HFpB and shall be subject to the following provisions_ Section II. The folloviing uses sha11 be pernritted _~'ith-in that portion of a district designated with a Flood Plain tiFpU Prefix: {a} Þ.gri'cultural activities including the ordinary cultivatjon of " . land or legal fOrfOS of aniinal husbandr~/. (b) Off-Street parking inciåental to any adjacent main use. (c) Electrical substati6n. (d) J\11 types of local utilities. (e) Parks~ comnunity centers, playgrounds~ public golf courses. (f) Private coranercial open a~~e~l arnusen1ents such as golf courses:. driv"ing t~ilnges, ar·chè~".Y courses a.nd similar uses \t;hen approved b.y Spec'j fi c Use Permi t. -26- /2 TEXAS ~:;".: ~L' ~')~.. ~!f~~ r.~ ¿;~ ã ~t~. Lt: ~ . ~ Ü ~J ~.riÀ [J tk. ,} S· tW- .~:: " ~:I!J'" ~., ~1"à ~~ ~, ~ ~ ''::''''é í"P > ;:' "',1 í.:- ¥f'~l ~_ U ~ ~... ~ ;..~.. í_ COMPANY, ~ e May 1 5, 1980 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council North Richland Hfl1s~ Texas Texas Electric is filing a request today for a $123 million systemwide increase in revenues. This represents an overall increase of 17.7 percent. e The increase is needed because the cost of providing electric service has risen dramatically, primarily due to unprecedented inflation and the continuing need to build new power plants that use less expensive and more reliable fuels to generate electricity. Inflation has had a severe impact on almost all costs associated with the company's operation, but particularly on costs of our construction program) which is designed to hold down the overall price of electricity for our customers. For more than ten years we have been building jointly-owned lignite plants with Dallas Power & Light and Texas Power & Light. Today we have eight lignite units in operation, and as a result, the price our customers pay for electricity is lower than it would be if these plants had not been built. Because of the short supply and the increasing price of gas and oil, we must continue to build plants that use lower-cost and more plentiful fuels. Two other lignite units and two nuclear units are now under construction. Building plants that use these fuels costs a lot of money, and our 1980 construction budget is a record $254 million. This construction program requires that we continue to attract people willing to invest their money in the company. But to do this, we must be able to pay these investors for the use of their money. Today the cost of money is a lot higher than it used to be. However, we have been able to keep a good credit rating, and this enables us to obtain the needed funds at the lowest possible cost. This helps keep bills as low as possible for the people we serve. There's still another reason this fuel-changing program needs to be continued. As you know, the low-cost natural gas contracts we secured many years ago have helped us hold down the price of electricity. One of these contracts will expire at the end of 1980, and the other at the end of 1981. e The new gas and oil weill have to buy will be much more expensive. This means the cost of electricity will go up, but it won't be as high as it would have been if we hadn't planned ahead. By using lignite coal and by our planned use of uranium, we are trying to help minimize the increases in our customerslelectric bills. 0, )< :~) --OJ'' r x /\ ~ '; :'~ { ~'~ --'7 ~) e e e .., -2- But for our program to remain on schedule~ we must request that revenues from customers be increased. This revenue increase will enable us to continue providing the benefits of the fuel-changing program in this period of unprecedented inflation. · We realize a rate increase places a financial burden on our customers. But their bills would be even higher if we could not continue the construction program that lets us use the cheapest available fuels~ because we then would have to make more of their electricity with high-priced natural gas and oil. For these reasons, we ask your careful consideration of this request. Sincerely, / ,7,/:1 1 '? ~ .' '~ - _.- /I ,"', 1) . /' 1 . '<'-~J (~.-¿¿, ;ir"<-~ e e e RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1 . The schedule of rates filed by Texas Electric Service Company be, and are hereby suspended for a period of 120 days from June 19, 1980 (the rate effective date); ? '-. This resolution is necessary in order to give the Council and City Attorney time to study the proposed rates. PASSED AND APP~OVED THIS DAY OF APPROVED: Di ck Faram, ~~ð.yor A,TTEST: Jeanette ~/ìoore, Ci ty Secretar.y AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, City Attorney .I Cf ¡ i t· , 1 980. CITY OF 50.2 5 508 012 2 NC[~TH R I C>-¡L{\;<D HILLS ; 2 1 8 5 0 L~ 621:, 8 D32 3 SOL:- 232 0 ~eSOIllïîons 507 895 1 507 852 2 Jeanette Moore 500 ïûo 0 5J!! O~26 6 5u4 315 0 503 228 9 5 02 O? 7 l} 5 0 J ;- 02 8 2 of Corporate Board 503 229 7 504 915 0 50L~ 626 3 505 ol+8 9 507 377 0 507 062 6 ~o 1, , Secretary of - City of North Richland Hills . a corporation duly organized and e:tisting under tbe laws of the State of T exa s . ånd doing business i i 11 s Texas, do hereby certify that I am keeper of the records and minutes of the proceedi.ngs of the Bo;ttd of Directors of said Corporation. and that on tbe . 9 t h . day of J II n p 19--8.0 there was duly and legally held a meeting of. said Board of Directors. at which a quorum of the Directors was present and actiag throughout, and at said meeting the following resolutions were unanimously adopted: RESOLVED. That NORTIIEAST NATIONAL BA..'?\TK, FOrt Wonh, hereinafter called "Bank·', is hereby designated as a depository of this Corporation and that an account or accounts shaH be established in behalf of this Corporation with Bank under the style of under and subject to the rules and regubtions as {rom time to tim~ prescribed by Blnk wherein may be deposited any of the funds of this Corporation whether represented by cash, checks. nOtes, or other evidences of debt and from which withdrawals are hereby authorized in tb~ name of the corporation, by any two (Number of signatl¡,res røquiroå) of the following: --Dick Faram Dave Freeman Charles W. Williams Ruth Pinnpr Jeanette Moore IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that any of the above-named þ::\rties shall be authorized to individually sign for and receive the statements a.nd c2rtœllcd vouchers of this corporation. or to appoint in writing. agents to sign for and rcceh'e such docu, ment.'\ and any of the above-narned parties are hereby further authorized to Stop payments against checks of thi~ corporation 3.cd to bind the corporation thereto. Endorsenlcncs for deposit may be by written or stamped endorsement of the Corporation without designation of the party making the endoIsement. FURTHER RESOLVED, Tbat any two (Nf¡,mbFf' 0/ s¡gn;lttJ~OJ req:Jirad.) of the following: e Di ck Faram Ruth Pinner ---Ðñve FrppmñY1 __.,~anette Mo_orp Charles W. Williams rmlY horn time to time borrow money in the n3ffie of the CorrJOratÏon from tIle Bank and give the Corporation's nOtð or o:her evidences of ind~bted- ncss therefor. in such amOunts and for such time and rare of inrerðc as may be design~ted on said nOtes 01' other evidences of indebtedness or a.~ nllY be the Bank·s cu.~t.::>m. and any of said persons m:1Y secure the JY.lyment of any or all bdr~btedncss and obligations of the Corporation to B::tnk by the exe- cution ~nd cldivc:ry for and on behalf of the Corporation of dee¿s of trust. assign.ments, chattel mortgages. sep~ra~e co!lateral agreements, pledge agree- mentS, loan agreements. and otber S~CUrlty agreements, a.ç well a3 any ocher agreement that n1ay be requLrcd by the Bank, whechCI simih~r to any of those enumerated or nOt, which said agr~ments or instrum~n(S may. :tmong other things, pl{>dge. encumber, con\'ey, or cover any or all prope-rcles of the Corporation, including bills, notes. accounts rc-ceivablc, stocks, bon<b, real estate and personal property, as well as any other propcrty and assetS of the Corporation. whether similar to those enumerated Or not, and the notcs, bills, accounts, certificates of deposit, and ocher receivables and instIUD;lents owned by said Corporation m3.Y be transferred to slid Bank for rediscount or for purchase or for collection on tne endorsement of any of said persons; and any of said persons shall have authority to waive demand, prOtest. and notice of protest or dishonor of any ch~ck. not~. bill, dIaIc, or other instl'ument made, drawn. or endorsed by this Corporation. FURTHER RESOLVED. That Bank is hereby authorized to honor any and all wichdra\vals of the Corpo.tacioa's funds payable to the officer or agent signing. or cOuntef3igning t..1-te same. or payable to Bank. whether such withdrawals are presented for cash or for credit to the personal account of such officer or agent or the p~fSOû presenting the same, and' Bank need make no inquiry concerning any such item. FUR TrIER RESOLVED, That the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary shall certify to Bank the names of the presently duly eleCted and qualifying officers of this Corporation as well as the persons authorized h~reunder, and shall fro:n time to time hereafter, as changes in the personnel of said officers or the persons authorized hereun.der are made. immediately certify in writing such ch:.lnges to Bank. and Bank shall be fully protected in relying on such written certifications of the Sécretary and shall be indt>maiiied 3..O.d slved ha.rmle.s3 from éiny claims, demands. cxpenst'S, Josses, or damages resulting fcom or growing out of honoring the signature of any persons so certified or refusing to bODor any signature not so certified. FURTHER RESOLVED. The s:lid authority herein conferred shall remain in force uncil written notice of revocation thereof shall be received by said Bank or a new resolution superseding the present on'~. FURTHER RESOLVED, That these re:soluuons and me authority herein granted shall pass Ç.nd inure to any successor or 'co the assigns of B~k., I further cerilly' that the following are the names and tbe true and official signatures of the present· officers of this Corporation and the persons authorized to sign for and on behalf of this COi'þoradon ia the forcgoiug resolutio1l.~. ----.--...-------- ----PresiJent -" ---AI IiJtant S (;"'<:1';'1 V Ûð P,.sÛ·dQt: Æ.JSÙtant Tre";,J'urer e S' ecretar, (SEAL) T reasu," L.'J' \~'ITNESS WI-IEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as Secreta.£j· of s:lid Corporation, and h¡¡vt- attached hereto the official seal of said Corpo- r...doa, this 9tfl--day of June . 19BJL_. FO*'ï.1 ;:I.' S tJcrtltar'J ( . , J' " ¿ I ~ e City of JX6rth RichJand Hills, Texas II \~i I\~;f ~,~ ~4F--- .- MEMO TO: Thomas Paul City Manager FROr~ : Ruth Pinner Director of Finance DATE: May 14, 1980 SUBJECT: Funds for Three Signal Lights e There has been $143,000.00 committed to pay for the three signal lights. This was committed from the General Fund Surplus. The Council has already approved payment of $3,660.00, leaving us a balance of approximately $139tSOO,no. ~~¿~ . / lJ1~J..I\. I "~-"I1A~ Ruth Pinner Director of Finance rp - (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 .. " ~ ' . e .. ~1EMO TO: Tom Paul City Manager FROM: Allen Bronstad Director of Utilities DATE: Ivlay 14, 1980 SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Installation e Mr. John C. Higinbotham. Engineer with PAWA. Incorporated. gave us an estimated cost of $128,874.75 for the three (3) signal lights as follows: Grapevine Hwy and Harwood Road Grapevine Hwy and Edison Ave. at North Hills Mall Davis Blvd. and Emerald Hills Way () ../J /Jilt ,) L) 1..;;:!;û&f·..: l :: ,-f~ Allen Bronstad Director of Utilities pb e r:L:~: =:~'/¡~D 1\ ;~ t \ I 1 !t 1 f} ~ 10 P. pi ~ t . "" v .,j ~, (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.£. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118 C~l~{ r.fl/~r-·j~t~(]~r? ( J KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. Iu ICONSULTING ENGINEERS/ Fort Worth-Dallas May 30, 1930 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 320 North Richland Hills, Texas 76113 Subject: 3-222, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, MACKEY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, CO'4iU:NITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT dO.BB-79-UC-46-0301 Bids were received on May 29, 1980, at the Tarrant County Department of Planning for the subject project. This project includes the construction of concrete channel liner from Onyx Drive South to Jerrell Street on Mackey Creek. The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the tabulation indicates, bids were received from nine (9) contractors. The low bid submitted was frcm }i a U Construction Co. , in the amount of $80,647.12, with a total tine bid of 90 calendar days. ' The Total committed funding from Tarrant County through HUD's Cornunity Development Act is $79,400 for construction. A maximum of $7,040 in contingency funds my also become available bringing the County total to $d6,440. If the actual construction costs , based on as-built quantities, do not exceed $>6,440, then City participation in the cost of construction would not be required. On the basis of the bid.; submitted, we would suggest that the City Council recor5nend that the County Conm;issioners Court award the contract to the low bidder, tt & D Construction Company, 201 H. E. 29th Street, Fort Wortn, Texas 76106. Upon your approval and recommendation, the County Commissioners Court will proceed with contract award for this project. We will be present at the June 9, 1930, Council meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. RIC3AG:J W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA:mh . Encl . ++ fu ^xa THIS COP cc: Mr. Charles W. 'Williams, City Manager ., Fir. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities ' Mr. Dalton Thrasher, Program Coordinator, Tarrant County Dept. of Planning M & D Construction Co. 550 FIRST STATE DANK 17L0G • DEDFORD. TEXAS 74021 • S17/203-6211 • METRO/267.3367 t . - -- - ' , . - -, , . - '- .- - * o ::: PJO ~-s (J') ^ ~ ..... . ~ . . , ~ r rr1 :z: ~ ;0 o þ -< t/') OJ ...... o I I I I I I I I I . \D o (Jl ~ Q) o I t I ~ 8 OJ J--I o gg z o --f o -i Þ r )::a 3: o c= z --I "OJ ....... o I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ co o 01 ~ ~ en ,~ ""-I lT1 ~ -<:rr 00 ():) ~ (J1 0 ~ r"\) '..J \.0 o 01 ~ ~ "-o.J 01 \.0 C> o I . I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I J-' N :E:A- (X) N ~ 0'\ ..þ '-J Q) o t--' 01 I~ w . . w (J C") :::r --' PJOJ ::S1J) ::sc.n ro --a - = CJ ....... Ø). ~ m co '0 :J: o -" (D (J') OJ r- = ....... ~ -'. ::1 N CD ~ -so ~ 0 C> ~ :::s -0 n· --' c.n s:::. a.. ...... rt ::r ' 11 ..... . -" c+ CD -s 3: ro c... ....... " ØJ ....... . ::s .cc: ::s :;c -to) roo .......~ ::13 -t)([) o c.. -S n n .....·0 ::1::S ~o (J")~ rt rl- (1)~ CD --' -to) o -S fT1 :Þ ("'") :r: n -< . t-a N N w ~ -Þ ~ ~ ~ N w o 01 N -Þ Q) o ~ " .-a 0'\ T'\) m CO to-' o N ....... o a o tT1 o ....... ~ N N o <:) o ........ ~ " W (J1 ~ U1 o ~ o N )--& ~ 0) m f-1 "-J ....... ~ U1 co 0'\ Q) W ~ w o o 01 N ~ o o o ...... \II ~ C> o o N ,...... c: :::s n --' PJ (/) (!) ...... . -t) --I. m 0- n ::r PJ ::s ::s (I) --' IT1 X n OJ < OJ rt , --'. o ::s Cì -< . ~ .-a~-o .. :z: r ~--i> :+:- - :z: -i -< to ! Iii" a .. . - en 0 -< (I) .. - ~ ~.~ ~ ~~ .~ -0 -i ""7' ~ð w ~ ~~ I ;a;:o N ):::» ~ Z ~ ~ ir'n ~~ I~ :I: . ..,., r- o ~ "., ;:Q ~ .. -I ", :;::: o f11 en 0, :;::0 () o c: Z -f .::: z ~ - o m en ("') ::::0 - ~ o :z z o .. - -0 -I o :Þ- -t f1'1 ----- - ~ :Þ ("'") ^ [T1 -< ( CD, ;:0 - rrJ' '=' fT1 A 0 nJ>o :r:-I :Þ-w~ :z ~ $ 1-< ~ ~ -0 ~ ;1:1 C> t-I <: '\.0 ~.~ m 2' -t U') o z .. 3:' OJ k N '-0 '-9 ..... \D co o c:: :z: - -i -I ,. 3: IT1 .. 1'2; .. OJ o o 0, ~ ~ -0 c: 00' :;O:Z t-' . co - - .......a .' ("'") ~ ........... ('Jl fT1 0"\ Q) N 01 ~ I ....... '" . N \.0 .. ("") W ~ 0 ¡-a 01 (I) \.0 ~ ¡CO ..þ -I l~ !~ 13: ~ J;¡ .....¡Qo C I:;::! 7/° ç 10 ~rrJln -i J;¡i- ~ 0 I?"¡~ ~ z ~I--I\~~?=' ~~ ~¡ro' \ o'x It/) k, . O1!PJtc-t-~O I"d· ¡. ~ -0 c:: tf-A ::;0 ::z: ex> o -- ~ .' 0 ~ '-J o ; -., . --- o U1 W ......a I ....... N -......,J 01 }--! "'" N ~ 01 o o '-J N ~ 00 00 Ul o o ~-oc:: ::0 :z Q) -- · ("'">-1 en m 01 ~ ~ o ,\{f ("') o 0 0) en co -i fo-A o I~ ~ 01 .. \ J-I 6 C> <:) .V-t ~"c::::¡ ~~=:x:> .. ("'> -I I 8m ~ ~ [D ~ ...... CT\ ... Q) 0"1 ~ C> o N ...... -0 -Þ n :I: ...-.a"""1. ¡.....& 0 · -Þ< W·'C) ........... -I. 0 'II. ~::S. :z w (.Q · t-t ';0 CO .. OJ z ....... I 0 c.... ("") 0 Ol-lXm· CJ oox' -f) r- oo· CX>-t) f"T1 ex> en CD 'Jm-s n c.n CJ) 0 o 0 z 0) ::1 V> ...... -i C"'> C> en -I ï'1W< c-t' ~ ........ · t-':Z mv> :s: 0 o rT'J Z -S · c+ , C"') ::r ,·0 ......... ... ØJ Z ()) ::s .. (/') . t-' --t (') -t O(t>ØJ;O wx tn.. ØJC"'+ V')('O("") -so en :I: m m .-1 - ('"') C> en -t ....,-o=~::: c-+. ("'") Z t-i · 0 =nr · · r :E: n........... owo ):> -SOZO-3: c-t x V> cr ::T --to>~ '" +::-;:0 · oc:n ........ --f w n t-f V') Q)([)N-I;QC") ....... X CX'.J ........ n :r: +::-DÞ orc: Q(/) zmr -I N w .-. o " . J ",y"",~.~,. • I° 1° l °1 �— l 1�1J_11 1 1 1 i U N. Ix LO F-- VJ n� V a = I — M O to p h n^ - l n I -1' > h I I kr) 1- ul ..10 O .. In O N. If) " CO CO - IN. "' : g T j IL Z X C to Li CO > a N J • 6 t WIC O 0 I II f JUOICI \ FC)L 0 C O Q Z • L • H tyl 21-4 O_ CD �_ ��.Ni l� i0 I LLl i r l I I_ OC co - N y IO O N IC NI OJ I ( I i I- t0 t0 0 cN -* C, Its O 1 In- • .• M U .. - I I Z O C V try CO M ''t I i O' > O LC) r+ W 0 _I _ I U > Y O) Cr) q z • o m o f}oI io I l I I� I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 o z.,- t0 L.I to •"l o 0.to _c \ F- o . 1 I I Z oU Ov3 (O do v N 1_ I I—L- I_ ti) of of 1,0j I I I I I I I _J ___1 TL U CD C MF- 1� N 01 M Fes- Ij\ p O co 1-F 0) (IO IC6I {O O X•C.• to a NI CO !.) 16 {p, I __ to 4' > M C' O C I _ J O"' C IL LC 0 0 3 •---- I- In 0 • w _ W C- c7 vi- Z cUOJ N O p NI to ,. IOI O O I IO I I I I _ I • F c:- 10 O In __ 00 F- CO CID c=1 � N m Itn .- O O N p Z • M •.tn In O I N .-I 11D CD K to c 1� n- �1 w^ I_rn — F- 0 o 1- z o - -I ICI -▪J o O �. m \NJ ~ UIIn O.I O. 1 1 m Z CJ O ^ V C O 1 1 1 H Q "J 2 K NI�LI IN I _ y OO 0 Z _ V N I 1 m •• F- 1 W 2 I-I-, I 1 1 • I I • I- I I I 2 I V)V) F- >- } U 1 I Z Z U U W 11 I O CO W . 01 7 4 --I o K I 1 I " d I a, 1 1 N ti I } I I _I 0 • S W OJ S Z O) W S 0) _ < U 01 YIY I 1 N O Y 0(4 1 I LLJ O W I I % dC r I - cc S o•. o U o a o p L S 0 I } Z C 0 O V• W O 0 - L C] I Y •• O • U W - Y L Y N C a • F- m 0! v I- I C > V- cC = I O (J a 6. ea C IL 0 2 -• Q. U cr a R' _ X T .0 C Z C ZO U W Y I-'• -O U Vf 0 O m = _ ¢•• C) N r- • 0 J Z O = 0 C o K \ CO 4 N F 9 0\ � W 1- U -C 0 0 Z to U O . 2 N J = W O T.S d O O U - W -O N a V {{{p' U F- W N c w L 5 F- N 2 V- - J 3 • Z N -C z 1 Q N + In = • O d IL' en W .) C N C y ¢ o 0 e o �, C L YY = UU M •• O W y'yt=p LU Z .• •M YV'i. W co Y N Cr)[ = CO CO - - 3 0 - o -3 CO " CD c... 0 Ii - C> ~ co 0 CO :z: I- w N ........ -< en fT1 !~ ~ . . . .. :;c ::;.0 ~ 0 .. . ^^ W () ( c: .. ~Z = ::r ~ :3 , · ::z: -0 OJ ~ n ~ i~ Ie 0 ::J 1./) --' ~o ..... . ::1 V> OJ ~~ W ;0 OJ m V) I ~ ;0 . --' = V') N ~z OJ ~. > N :z i~ =E: r :-t1 ~5 N -t (J) ~. ..... - fz ro ::J N CD -I () ·0 ïa (1)~ c.. ,,,, ~ 0 0 '&; -s 0 m c: :r: Wt 0 n :::: (I') z :I: 0 C> ::r ¡;~ '0, --i I -n --' ...... SJJ ;0 !:::: r- OO ~ Ct:J -f (þ ;::, -0 ~ :~~ - 0 Þ--4 0 V) n . :::s '=' ~~ 0 " :z ~ r- 0 --i --' C/) ro m ~ .., -i ~ f'?1 I'T1 Þ :E c:: . ......, . - 7J :z ~ r- -.I. 0.. )-of (I) ~ C> ~ ~ M- -.I. . rrJ ("') :z ?i :z þ ::r ::s x ;0 .. . .. :;0 0 3: ~ c: n 0 II =:1 OJ - 0 CJ I c:: ..... . ::c ~ < -0 »- 3: ..,. ----.- :Þ :z: --' ('t) ØJ -i .' --t » -< i --i M" -.I.-s c-t- - m ( ~ - . C/) CD ~ & . -.I. e> .. ^ . . ... I tc -s -t) 0 'm c:c ...... 0 c.. ::3 :z: -< Þ-4 I 0 3: -s 0 m (') ( n t:D ' , I I ' 0- ....·0 3:' ;0 - I .... . ~~ k fT1 0 I I po» rrJ - I t/)~ A-O I I N >- ; I M- fci \0 n -t - I I CD ... :J: fT1 I CD :Þ .. I I --' ~ ~ :z - - - ,- - I '-0 ;z:.:s I I -s co ~ .~ I 0 I I I t--t ~ I I . 3:" . ' I -0 ... I I ;;a I 0 ........ -. I I <: '~ - . rr1 ' I I 3: ' 0 I c:: ,." . . I I f"T1 (""") ( :z: :z . t - ~ · . - . '. -f" I l- n -< -< -I (.f) I ::I: · . -i I I - J I ..0 . :;:: ,. I JTI I J ~ c:: .. I ~ ):> -0 I~ I I ....... ~ 0'1 % r- - I I"\) ~ -; > . . CD I , N ~ ~ - :z: 0 '- J -i '0 0, I I -< I ~ I I I I -(;A c:i -0 c... -; N N :t> I rv co ~ -0 C J-& PJ . m CD I I W -.....J N :;0 ::z: ..þ. --' 0 V> I . · O-f "- --' . ^ C I I 0 0 0:> co SlJ IT1 r 0 0 0 m I'\.) U') txJ > I ~ v 0 CJ -; ~ ~ I ·x 0 ~ 0) -I z - t--' ~ t----a 01 '-J m wV) 0 ~ \D N ......... \..0 0 O"t O1X J-.oA -I Z 01 U1 ~ "" "" ~ \.0 N QJ. W · 0 ~ ~ 00 N W C> ,wen 0) """--J ~ \.0 '" en t-A t-A ( OJ W \.0 -I O· . N 0 0 N 0 C) 0 0 -a c:: ::::0 % -- o --I m ... - . ("") 0 en --f -0 C ~ :z: -- t;"") -i rn ." ('"") .. C> en .. -; en :I: rra -0 c: fT1 :;0 '% -; - - 0 -f &ïl W C> .,., (""") 0 w en -i , , I I e e - I /, / / ("'>~' ..'/ City of JXðrth RichJand Hills, Texas r ~~~tr~~~~ II ì . DATE: June 2, 1980 MEMO TO: Charles W. Williams City Manager FROM: Allen Bronstad Director of Utilities SUBJECT: Bursey Road Drainage Improvements Attached is change order No.1 in the amount of $13,021.75 for additional work on Storm Drainage and Pond work on Bursey Road. If this is approved by Council, the amount will be paid from Utility Bonds. {le&1J Allen pb (817) 281-0041 /7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 ( \ \ \ \, \ '~ e KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas May 27, 1980 t- Mr. Charles W. Williams, City Manager City of North Rich1and Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-223, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, BURSEY 'ROAD DRAINAGE 'IMPROVEMENTS, CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 e We are enclosing Ch~nge Order No. 1 to the subject project which contains the Contractor's proposal for the extra work required to begin construction. We would request that this item be placed on the June 9, 1980, ,agenda for Council consideration. The Cha,nge Order form is attached for your revtew" The Contract for this project was awarded to Joe R. Starks Construction Company, Inc., by the City Council on August 27,1979 for $30,701.74. This project includes construction of a 42-i nch storm sewer 1 ine from an ex;'sting storm sewer stub-out at Bursey Road, west of Valley Drive and north of the londonderry Addition site, through City owned property and terminating at a storage pond on private property approximately 631 feet north of Bursey Road. Also included is a concrete overflow structure on the pond to check eros-ion at its discharge point into an existing drainage ditch. The storage pond is located on property presently owned by John and Rita Frisque. The previous property owner, Emily Huffstetter, sold the property to Mr. Frisque before the required cons-truction easements could be secured. Mr. Frisque has now , granted the easements contingent upon addition to the Contract of the extra work items included in the attached Change Order. Such extra work includes dredging the stock pond of silt depos-its, providing additional erosion protection along the bank of the pond and along the effluent ditch, and the addition of energy dìssipating splash'blocks to the discharge headwall structure. The total amount of the change order is $13,021.75, which includes extra costs to the Contractor for increased labor and material prices over the nine (9),month delay periQd. The total revised contract amount is $43,723.49 with a revised completion time of 55 calendar days. ' Upon Council approval of the Change Order, we will issue a Work Order to the Contractor to proceed with the project. We will be present at the June 9, 1980, Council meeti,ng to answer any questions you may have concerning this Contract. ~tf/, ~ RICHARD,W. ALBIN, P.E. -- RÞIA: byg Attac'hments cc: Mr. Allen Bronstqd, Director of Utilities Mr. Steve R. Whitworth, Contractor, Joe R. Starks Construction Co. S' '~ ~> . - - ,. '1 ""~ ., ~'~ , \ ! ,......'") 1 ¡'¡ ,,>~ () , .. t 4"" - J.. '~.i 'oj ...J ~,.,. ,. ........ '-." C': ' c,...' ~.! "',.! L:j ;:~ R 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 K-E-F NO. 3-223 .. " 1" Da te : , 19_ CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED ., 19_ Between THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (OWNER) 4IÞnd JOE R. STARKS CONSTRUCTION CO. (CONTRACTOR) For DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT BURSEY ROAD AND VALLEY DRIVE: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, ·when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: The amount of payment to the Contractor shall be adjusted by the addition of the following construction unit prices: ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM QUANT. OF UNIT EXTENSION UNIT PRICES WRITTEN IN WORDS {PRICE)/UNIT 5. Contractor's Cost Due To Delay of Project 1 L.S. For: J.¿~. ~- Dollars & ~ Cents ($ .3()OO~ )/~ $ ~~ÐOO ~ 6. Dredging and Reshaping Stock Pond and Effluent Ditch Grading 1,330 C.Y. ~,n - Dollars & ...b::M.J Cents ($ 3..;8: )/C.Y. $-4TL2.~ For: 7. Removal of Excavation Material (Spoil) from Job Site 665 Dollars &~~ ($ Cl. IIBII Unformed Concrete for Pond Slope Protection and Effluent Channel, Incl. Reinf. Steel ~~~fl C.Y. ~ ~ 75 )/C.Y. $ +92 B. For: e 8. For: Dollars & ~~ents ($ 26' C. Y . ð t) .... elD ~tJ()-)/C. Y. $ .:J~ 00.- ,; 9. Addition of Class IIAII 3,000 PSI Formed Concrete Splash Blocks to 4211 Headwall, Including Reinf. Steel ~~ 1 L.S. Dollars & ~Cents ($ 2ðtJ!!.)/L.S. $ 2~ð.!!!!.. 7~~ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHANGE ORDER $ /~..I(J:2..I, .tit¡ TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 43. ?e:l3 _ I .. The Contract time shall be adjusted by the addition of /6 calendar days. ~~ CALENDAR DAYS. For: TOTAL REVISED CONTRACT COMPLETION TIME CONTRACTOR I S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHAN~7 By: ..&~ .e aJ ~~ ENGINE I RECOMMENDATION F ACCEPTANCE: ~: ~ .OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: y: Da te : ~~ 27 /n~ ~7 , 19 8ð Da te : , 19 to. Da te: , 19 1 of 1 e e e ,.-' , City of JX9rth RichJand Hills, Texas /¡ " ~, : . /~ ,...., ';-'-, , ' - -----~~~_.:.:-==- }~ rc- . DATE: MEMO TO: FRO~f : SUBJECT: t' . June 2, 1980 Charles W. Williams City Ma~ager Allen Bronstad Director of Utilities 2.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank Estemate NO. 9 The amount of $51,208.20 is now due and payable to Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc. This amount is to be paid from Utilities Bond Monies. ~ 1 tiffivJ Allen ph (817) 281-0041 /7301 N. E. LOOP 820/ P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 e e e KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas . . May 16, 1980 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-531, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, 2.0 MG ELEVATED STORAGE TANK ON BURSEY ROAD, CONTRACTOR' S ESTlr:1ATE NO. 9 We are enclosing a copy of Estimate No. Nine (9), dated May 16, 1980, made payable to Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc., 11221 West Rockville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46231, in the amount of $51,208.20 for materials furnished and work performed on the subject project. The quantities and condition of the job have been verified and checked by the City's Inspector and we have checked all extensions. We, therefore, recommend that the above partial payment be made to Universal Tank & Iron Works) Inc. We will be present at the next Council meeting should you have any questions concerning this estimate. (j) O~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R\~A: bvg Enclosure cc: r·1r. Thomas Paul ,Ci ty f't1anager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Öirector of Utilities Mr. Bill Rutledge, City Inspector Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc. (Attn: Mr. Ronald J. Scott) 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367 l.. U N I t< A C T 0 R S E S T I M A T E .. .. .. - ... .. ... .. .... .. - - ESTIf-1ATE ~JO a'" NINE (9 ) .JOB NO..... 3--531 P 1 OF FILE F3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- 2.0 MG ELEVATWD WATER STORAGE TANK O~- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS OATE- 5/16J TIME CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 453 DAYS CONTRACTOR- UNIVERSAL TANK & IRON WORKS, IN( FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND lABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 4.''30/80 WORK ORDER DATE- 2/ 2/79 CALENDAR DAYS" 420 COMPLET.ION DA TE-- 3/28 PREVIOUS THIS UNIT NO.. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTI{\1ATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE " AMOUNl ---~----~--~-----------~------------~ -------.... -...------ -------- ....----....-- ...---...-- 1. ·INSiAL. CONC. FOUNDA T ION L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 44000.00 44000. 2. YARD PIPING L.S. 0.00 1.00 1.00 12800.00 12800. 3. DELIVERY T A~JK ~ COMPON. TO JOB L.So 1.00 0.00 100 559400000 559400. 4. ERECTION OF TANK L.S. 1000 0.00 100 201170000 201170. 5. PAINTING OF TANK L .S', 0.15 0.S5 1.00 49000.00 4900001 6. ELECTR I CAL \tJORK L.S. 0.00 0.00 0000 4060.00 Ooj 7. TELEt-1ETER ING LoS. 0.00 o.ao O.SO 3060.00 2448. ~ 8. FENCING L.S. 0.00 0.00 0.00 6540000 o . ~ , IELD VERIFICATION OF ~OB CONDITIONS AND CONFIRMATION OF PAY QUANTITIES Y _(-~~~--J¿gft£!__ÇOL~ )__________ ~OWNERfS PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE) ATE~ ,19 ----------------~~-~--- --~-------~-----------~~-------------------------------------------------------- PPROVED- ~NOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS. INC. CON~TING ENGINEERS BY-Iú?¿~_~_L€-_ DATE- m~ It, · .19 [0 ----~-~---~-------~--- ---~ TOTAL ... 6 . . . . . . 0 . . LESS 10 PERCENT RETAINED 0 . . . DIFFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . PLUS 75 PERCENT MATlS ON HANDo . TOTAL ............. LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS . . . . . DIFFERENCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE. . NOTE-PAY LAST AMOUNT SHOWN 868818G 86881& 781936. o. 781936. 730728. . 51208. fOTAl EARNINGS (INCL. RETAIN.)~$ 868818.00 rIME CHARGED THRU THIS PERIOD- 453 DAYS TOTAL BID~$ 880030.00 PERCENT- 98. TOTAL TIME~ 420 DAYS PERCENT~ 107. e . ( . < ;:;.~ :> .. 0",- ~ -~,' ~/J e U~' ,N: T; 'I' V" E' A'~· SA';'" II. .' .l-:." I? , . II /', " ~'. '" , ¡Í¡: ,'> :' ' ~' .'; ~' , , t·,. .. '-~::'':'',' ':; <,l;~~",,7/ 4?:r:~~!;~)..~...........~ & IRON WORKS INC. .. , ~r:':;:;~-i:..... :_.~.:: ~~~,:, 11221 WEST ROCKVILLE ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46231 . AREA CODE 317 ~ PHONE 243-8282 :May 16, 1980 Knowlton, English & Flowers 550 First State Bank Building Bedford, Texas 76021 Ref: Elevated \Vater Tank North Richland Hills, Texas UTI Job #6667 /' Gentlemen: e On May IS, 1980, the referenced \vater tank was made available to the system, and therefore, we have established May 15, 1980 as the date of Substantial Completion. Also, the warranty period on the tank, painting and accessories will be effective on :May 15, 1980. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ¡JA/f11ø-6 ~~nald '6J. Scott Construction Manager RJS/mb ¡~OUTING juS ~,!o. FlUNG F:!J\ lLG -- KfE DEM e 8?F R';,'·\ ~: E R -- D~.C \':AS ---- G.':_' F f, R '/l -.---..- --.-- --, ..J 1- ~ . . ' " INVOICE e AREA CODE 317 PHONE ..~ 271·82Bt UNIVERSAL 'TANK & IRON WORKS, INC. 11221 WEST ROCKVILLE ROAD 'ONTRACT DATE INDIANAPOLIS. INDIANA 46231 AREA CODe 317 ,PHONW:iìiiì ~~~~ CUSTOMER ORDER NO. REQUISITION NO. DATE TO SHIP SOLD BY INVOICE DATE INVOICE NO. JOB #6667 4/30/80 9 ~ì1-823 i TE R MS PER CONTlf.AL'T A(;REEME1'¡T r CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXI1S %KNOWLTOr'¡-ENGLISH-FLOfvERS, INC.'. 550 1ST STATE BAft!K BUILDING BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 -, r s H I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS p -, s o L o T o L ITEl~1 # ¿' fTEM #3 T -.J 0 L -' -I DESCRIPTION PERCENT PR ICE AMOUNT COMPLETE COMPLETED TO DATE , TN5:;TllLlATIO!J OF C'ONCRETE I FOULV1)llTION 100 44,000.00 44,000.00 I \'ARD PIPING 100 12,800.00 12,800.00 DELIVERY OF ["IlBRIClITED TANK COMPONENTS TO JOB SITE 559,400.00 559,400.00 ERE'CT rOtv OF 'PAlIK 201,170.00 201,170.00 PAINTING OF TANK 49,000.00 49,000.06 ELECTRICAL WO}<K 4,060.00 TE {'E!~1~"TER ING 80 3,060.00 2,448.00 FEiVCING 6,540.00 QUANTITY ITEl~ # 1 ITEft-l #..¡ ITE?-1 ;; c: ITE!1 #6 ITE,~ #7 ITEl1 #8 T()TAJ, c'OMPLETED T() DA'!'F: LG"S·S: 10 t RF:TAI!VAGE --- PRr:v,IOuS 86~881.80 730,728.00 868,818.00 ·...f)'fi1 L DE11l1c"T TD!\.5 817,609.80 e I TOTll í. fJl fl.: Tl! r s ¡.;: . [f1A 7'£' ! , i CERTIFIÇATION OF ESTINAiE IS RECONt1ENDEO HITH ~~SPECT TO fIELD O~SERVATION Of JOB CONO]:TIONS AND PAY QUA~nïIES " /1 â ~~~- ~I :M M/þ --- / c/ BY:./£' £tl {." (7 ¡/¡dC;/ifC DATE:-__s-/A'8"-? (._ S PR EC I REPRES ¡ITAf1VËJ / I / i./ v..:~ t,p.rehy tf'rt,fy rí~dt the yood,> cov~rpd by tr.,s in\.'oicp. II'.: rc 51,208.20 ;- /--- .,.) , '(;"0 (.~:ê/ ~~, e City of JX8rth Richland Hills, Texas \J/¡\~--1 '" I ~~~,::::.-::.....-."\::.:- ~~ , 1).(\ 4¡;~\ \, I t .. ~1EMO TO: c. \~. t~i 11 i ams City Manager F R O~1 : Ruth Pinner Director of Finance DATE: SUBJECT: June 4, 1980 Payment to PAWA, Incorporated for Traffic Signals e I have reviewed the subject request for payment in the amount of $2,135.00. and it appears to be in order. These funds will be taken from the General Fund Surplus account set aside for the Traffic Signals. .~ .A-./~ ~i 1t~,11 ~ · /;~ , .;I---....---r~ Ruth Pinner Director of Finance rp . . e (817) 281·0041 / 7301 N.[ lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 e e . . e .. ^,1ay 8, 1980 Mr. Alan Bronstead Director of Utili ties City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Mr. Bronstead: Please find enclosed three (3) copies of Invoice No. 2 for the Traffic Signal Design Project for three intersections in North Richland Hills. If you find this fee statement to be in order, we will appreciate receiving payment in the amount of $2,135. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or if we can furnish adcli tional informa tion. Sincerely, PA W A, Incorporated ~J\~~. ~~;esident JH:vlp Enclosure 7540 LBJ Freeway Park Central, Suite 707 Dallas, Texas 75251 (214) 661-9406 e MONTHLY STATEMENT OF CONTRACT ACCOUNT .. Invoice No. 2 Date May 8, 1980 Period Covered April 1 , 1980 , through April 30. 1980 Project: Traffic Signal Plans. Specifications, and rontr~rt f)nrl Jmpnt~ CI ient : City of North Richland Hills e STATEMENT OF CONTRACT ACCOUNT Contract Amount $6,100.00 Adjustments 0.00 Total Contract Amount $6,100.00 Previous This Month To Date Statement Value of Work Completed (see back) $3,660.00 $2,135.00 $5,795.00 Less 0 % Retainable 0.00 0.00 0.00 Net Total $3,660.00 $2,135.00 ~5.795.00 PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT t CERTIFICATE I hereby certify the above amounts to be true and correct. e Project Manager '(f ~:\<.aH.L May 8, 1980 Date MAIL TO: PAWA line 7540 LBJ Freeway, Suite 707 Dallas, TX 75251 BREAKDOWN OF CONTRACT AMOUNT «Sk Con tract °10 Complete Amount o. Deseri pt ion Amount To Date This Mo. To Date This Mo. . Total Project $6,100.00 35.0 95.0 $2,135.00 $5,795.00 e I I e TOTAL $6,100.00 $2,135.00 $5,795.00 ~í e City of ~rth Richland Hills, Texas _~I~~ cþt\~ ~ . r1Er~10 TO: c. ~J. ~Jilliams City Manager F RO ~1 : Ruth Pinner Director of Finance DATE: SUBJECT: June 4, 1980 Payment on Central Fire Station I have reviewed the subject request for payment on the Central Fire Station and it appears to be in order. $17,407.63 of these funds will be taken from Revenue Sharing and the balance of $42,928.37 will come from the General Fund Surplus. _ ~'/' '- /j..~ A-d,¡ ., /~~ Ruth Pinner Director of Finance rp e (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 City of J(8rth Richland Hills, Texas e ':,:~ FIRE DEPARTMENT Stan R. Gertz Fire Chief . Memo to: Charles Williams City Manager From: Stan Gertz Fire Chief Date: June 3, 1980 Subject: Partial Payment of $60,336.00 for Central Fire Station. Attached is the request for partial payment of $60,336.00 of the work completed on Central Fire Station for a period of May 1, 1980 to May 31, 1980. The projected finish date is June 15, 1980. I would like to recommend this item be placed on the next council agenda for approval. e ms e (817) 281-0041 / 4101 MORGAN CJRCLE .... P. O. BOX 13305! NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 ~~ -- larry w. dixson . architect. aia ,J1J.t18 3, 1980 . ~r. Stan Gertz, Firechief City o~f Ì'-T01~th FichJé1nc1 T{ills 7301 fToY'tl1e3.st IJoo:) ,g20 Forpt ".\7ort11, TeX8~~3 76118 Pe: Central Fire Station C i t~.r 0 f I\T 0 r-t 11 :F i C}1 J. ~,nl d. 1 T i J..l ~~ 1)e8r c~ · ;.) l.r: Please find hercì:,'it)1 three ('3 ': co:;ics of AlA Ð0Cllmen"t G?O?, A~)"?ljc8tion Cl::1d Certificate fOï~ -;::'8Vi!pn"G, in tllC mn.ount (ìf ~)6(",1J6.()(), cover-in; ti)Õ]8~)er'io':1 ~'~jY 1, 19.30 thru ~'ay :II, 1080, ::for v-'or'1-:: é:lccor'1:Üis!î.ed on thp 8,'Jnve :r8~~ereYJ.cec1 Droject. e I 118,"\re C (18 C 1'~erì, ?l1;'l 8 tn r0, ~l lzn, (ì ,oJ 1. e d ~; e t 1'1, e ~ ',7 (\ r 1 c h 3.:~ on tIlis 8,)l;licG.-tion. c e rt i. f:'T in fJ t1'1..~?t to -c ,ne o ?~ 1~ e ,S Ei ~.:; ,~ t (ì -t 1~1 0 ~! í'\ i n -c ~)est ')f il1clicélte::-ì Fle8se h811"ne t'" h8.'/8 thi~~:"8crd nl1 th0 é1cen-';a :for the ne-¿:t C'~,'1)I1.cil ~neetinr~ so tl'1?_t -·':8.~;,;~:~cn,t carl be n18.:~3e. --*'. ,/,/'" ) ",\,.../ .t"'-t L 1 ~l}V,-y -G rll.;,T , / .- ,.... ......-~ ' ""-.,; '...-) /' /'/ / ¡,/ f/jl /' I I /1,/\,,/. ¡ ! // f'U~Ä ~:L/. (;'j/'/0'~) ¡ " / Larr;'T '-'. D1XS on, A/: I .A. ..- \--/'/ ,1 T:!d L// e 7001 Grapevine Highway, Suite 408, Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Telephone 1/817/589-0621 ê~:~;;:: ~ ::;:, -~. ct.-IT. C; <-I ~ _~~ß.: ~ c 0.. -<:.: c <-I c.. ~ - z ~~~~~;; g-r:O::~~ r:~~:;::" g £ c- ~ 8 r:. 7:-~ L- _ r: v to._ / > - '-.J C ~ ~ ~ ~ > _ v ~ v: .,.J ~';: ~ r r:~ .,-=-c: t~[~t:~ - ~ r: < \...,. ~' :r:. v r:: :; r: t..: v : cO-: n ~ IT r; :: Q. -- ,-, r- ¿,~ _ ~ J- ~ c r- c.. --< :5 ;' ,;- ....... 7: - - - '- .- '- 2. J ---"þ --- - ~~-r:>r: Ô 0 \..I"': ª- S- ee r¡ C ;:::~ ~?r:_3~ ;; -< "< ~ 2 > ~ \.!: 'J c:; °a C~ . z > ::. ~ ~~...~ )- :;:: > 'S- 5 <:;. '? ~.::: 3: ;[~ 9-g ~~ ~)~~~ ~ ë3~ \,,~n ~ r;· r \. t~ r-;;'" ~ SO ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r: r: ~ E. I~ I~ ;: -1 ro, r.. - "- __t:..> :::-~: 3: v ¿ 0 Ç2 ~ - -i o ~~r; m ,-,;;r= -. --t -a m ~ m 0 ~ 0 Po> ~ V;' ro ;~ c;~ ~ ~.~ W3-c c ~~ 0Ô r: __ c':r c..l':. ;:)' (J r;. C :J ë~ ~ 0 r-.. c' 1) ~ - ~ (t ~ :J o C ::, ~ -'r:F:~. ~ " É1 : I~) ~ '\; >- ~ () -r ..... - .....; m () --i ""- trJ () m ~ ~ - ...... . I - -< n ;J> ....; m o PJ ..... Ö :N (';. ..... ~ > -< ~ m Z .....; ~~ , ~ ~ \: 5Z~~ '< 0 ;=- t:.J n::~~ 0';: g. 0 :3 u~ r- r.:: ~t7C- v. t..J If, (j g , Q... t-3 (D~(D x l.Yè X "D -PJ ~. þ:=j tf) ('þ \ - ,... ~ f¡~ (¡) 0<) C " 02 \)J ~ - r¡;. "rD , .-- :::;- V¡ N ~ t~ O-n ~ 0 "'< C o :J -.:< c-~ '5:;" ro " H ~p) ti ti 0:>5 Orr :s p; ~ CD ~ ?1 ED C- .) c: o (Ï ~" o ;:s o Q ~ PJ ~ ~ ~ ~ r: '- '. : 1: ;~.v ; J; r; v r: ¡~ C n ~ ;:' =:.; I;;;: ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ¡ ¡ì ~ ~-! I ~! ·I!~ ~-c<r:,~~ ~ ::; r: ~ r- I!': r:' r: c;- ~ r; !~ r:- - _ r. ~,< ;: ~ .-r. ,.....=.. r: ~,2. ~ t:' ,- v. .. v ::: v' r.' --< 6 ~ ~ ~ c.. ~ ~ :::- r: <: :: ~--< '-' ~ ~o;~~ ~"D r: v. c 2 ~ ç.? v' r: 7- 2 ~ v, -J v. c' ~ ~. -< g :: = c' < c...;~~=ë.. ~ ~ ~~' S·t¿ ('"') C ;::c "..,. m Z ~ ;; -< ~ l"'r'\ Z .....{ o C rn ~ Q) <:) w w 0') \8 1 ( ¡ ¡ -tA r- m VI V) ~ ;::: r¡"', ~ o c: tJ") ('"') m ~ ~ - n » --i m fJ) "":"! o :::0 ; -< ~ m Z -I w ..þa N m ~ \..0 o C) !~! I :: I> Ii I 1= !~ I I~ 12 ' ¡ '" I ¡ I I~ -.,..¡I 1°1-, ~¡ ~ I~I ~ L '. IV' r:: 1-6' :? f (J, ¡-c. Ie c' ,..... 0 !~ I:;:' --i ,.'" I > !~I I I ¡ ! ¡ I j I ¡ j I I i , í I . I ! ¡ ! ì ! I ¡ I UI ~ "'" S ~ ~ > '"' > r- C Z m _ > > -C') -- :::J m ~ n o c r- ~ -J ~ ::J (J') ;:: c ~. :::ï.....c ....; :;;........ > CJ z 2: > v..; C') m ~ <tFt ..þa <:) N \Ø OJ co U1 <:) <:) -; o n.....¡ :> r- r- c n - 0 [)~ C r- -J m G~ ¿o v.;~ V"; -t o n o Z --i ~ :> n -i U"J c 3: -i o o ;> -\ m ,..., ~ o -( o o » ...-t m ~.:F, ~ ..þ ~ '-I Q) (.T1 o o o .þ <..T1 co o o o o C) ~. - ,- r.~ª < r.. Z r:. (j -:::r Co> ::: ~ () CJ "'< n ::r Q.J :J CJ':¡ (!) o ,..... ~ v: ~ I o I 'C" 0 V'> ,-.. r: :::ï -;; C _ ª-~ ~ 2 .r c:;-¿ '< ~ )... u c' r---- \-,' Z if o "'-, \.../ C ~ c z v. o ~ CJ Z > r- n o z ...., ~ » n ....; ~ c: ~ .fr::F: o < J::::. v' U1 ro o <:) C> o o n > Z CJ rr. o ;;;:; o rr. ;;v t.n C ~ ~ >: /.... -<1 ~ n> Cï:i U· n c ~ t.J ,....., C :::ï V1 (Jj 3 r;. t..ì ('þ D- C. >c >'"' ~ -0 ~ v' ~ -' t.J C V'. o CD () ~ ,- r- ~ '-'t..- ---< r. ::: :: r.; ~ r.J C)V '~ _ ..J ~o < v' ::; ~ Cï ...--rD CJ 0 3-< r: ... (""\ -::; n o -' -' ro r. ::J c ..., ::r n o ...J rJ n t'-; v: a n o Z --f ~ ;> n ----i o -- ~ ..... V1 » -- ~ ..... ~ ..... . - n > -; - o z .,., o ~ -0 ;> -< ~ m Z --i c ~ ~. ::¡- =- c;. n c :J ., ~ n f]. ~ rt- ~ H ~~ 8Q ~ ffi LÔ u; CD t} rei P> ~ ¡.-: n o z ;;v » n -i o » -i m ~ rt o ¡---.;' (cD t-S tv U1 ~ '...0 -.....J '..0 ;:;c > n ~ r? m ~ 0 ffi ;;c t) QJ r--' n o ~ tf) rt 8 () rt 1-'. o ~ -c> ;;ç7= 52n :-n n~ --1m z~ Ov; f--' f---J -.....J > ~ ~ m Z o z ét-:;j-JO I) rt w J-.I- Crt ~~ 0:2 t-'. 0 Z 0 Ot)OH1 ~("7t-1 ~?Q:t ~8æ~ P1 CD tn ::;- ::;:j X rr- ~~g~ ~ ....-J '1J f---A o 0'\ OJ r') t--' OJ ~ ~ t,,) CL CO 0 n o z zn o (D t-: ~ 1 .-J rrrt" ::JM PJ r-' ~. o t-:lj ::J ~- f--Jt-) 5 (D Q,(J) rt :r::PJ ~-rt t-J I-~ .. f-'O (J) ::; 8 CD X PJ {fj ïJ m ~ o o .." ;;a -;0 o~ (J1 U1 I I W C> --' --J I I 0:> ex:> C) 0 urionoc n>o~ ~h~f --! _ Z _. ;ç~~O ); m ::; ~~ õ o :;;c ¡ . ~ C o > - ~ .... '-' r- - n ;> -1 - o z ;> z o n m ;::0 -...f - -n - ~ ~ ('.:. ~ t- ~, t-' f--J {J) n ;> .....; m .." o ~ -0 ;> -< ~ m Z ~ -c ;;\: º Ó :> 3: > ï: v r- tJ C n c $: r-r, Z --1 [) 'J D N n >- --! o z z o >- c: ~. ,- \..; Z r:¡ ~ -n w '. -;; () -..: > - . . :> ~- ~ ~c ~,0 ~ l... ~ > m Z Z -; z~ V':: ~. --l '-J ~c ~~ C -! . r:-. 0 ,...... t : -nO >z ;:c:_ ,-. -' ::2 ~ , fT' ..,;' ,-.. - - V":' Z 'J v' l..- - V1;:: Z ~ r"r. -, ~ . W -< W ):- \!) .... 0 0 ~ C> ~ c: rn 0 N C· ():) z <.n w 0) 0 w w w v ~ o o 01 0) o e:> t.J tv t..) :Tv!t0 ftv rT\....~, ff\.) )--..I ~ f-' ~ ;~ ~ ;--..J :....... : ~ :.-..; ¡ I -...J C"; L)l ~.W If',) E-' ;:::; "-D CD N 'C'ì !Uì ~ rw ,tv : ~ ~ ¡ \.D C;::) ~ 0'1 VI .Ä: W tv ~ . .. 'e ~. .. ' ; ¡ J , . I:: . !. I I , ; ~ W~ ~:~;o:~fn W~~f8 Wln'~ ~!~i8 n~m ~;~'~:Dj~l~jO;? ...J. . 10 ~ J OJ <: IfD 'CD t rt ,OJ 10' , CD f bJ 1 ~ - J IT ¡ 5:: ¡ ~. . I 0 ! ~.j tn I' Q" I CD I t1 ri ¡ ~' f W !.' tS n ~-!)J í~-t(D HI) 1t1 ;0 It) ~ ¡ :PJ ~t) fU) IH : (J) ' ~ I::; i r;- rv . 1(1 ¡ f-J·~O ~ t:J H.Y ~ t...... LQ 1::J ! Ii ! f---:OJ ! Ii 12, ¡;...... 1m if-';n 10 ¡ ¿ ì 0 ,rT 10 CD :::J . --,-,' PJ : f-'!!::¡; I'D ! f--. ill I<D rn- ¡ ;:r ~ ;:::¡ /CD I~ IQ if--- 'E:; liD if-'!O .::¡ :/1) ¡ p¡ 'f-' f-':;::. ¡ :::;'1 Ii if-' :-; ¡rt t-c1 ;:.....1'1 CD H-I·! P-l h1¡tPJ j<.t I~ :~ ; ~~. I. rt ! t-1 LÇ 'CD ; (J t---, ! I-:j: ¡ CD: ; ~ ., P i~- i 0 ;~. i.. PJ HD Ie':> fti ~ I to Hi lIT, r~ ~ ru rt. 0 rt '1m ',' ~,~.o 0 i-' IN c::> t--'~ fCL::J 1 .0 ¡CD .2= 1 'ro 1'1 I~!t-1. I .CD:;:J· :~!m ~t1 't-i; IPJ ::; to ,CD ....' :, I. IT '8:~ 1,' fr¡) '..QJ! ~ 1,v t PJ,': ru 1 f.' 0 ~ t-Q i () ;::1 " t-d; QJ I A"' n I rt ~. if) 7 '~ f-J·:rt;, tIT! ; f In- if-I. , PJ: I ~ :!lJ feD :0 ; f-'.~ ~.; 0.....,. n- )(1) 'i I t::j : f-' .... : I PJ I (J) , I .; OJ; ! ,::1: 'CD ¡ <! I CD I CD ~::1 ::J ¡ 0 iw ~ J :f-I:ro¡ ~ It-'::::J: f -' ---Iìm: ¡CD¡ fC-tt~.; : ;l-i;PJ Q..,::S :(f) i j t-i '8 ~ Ie; I ! lro m ¡r.' If-" 1m b. It<' , m I-.Q ,f---;- 10 IUJ! 0-11 .m f 1;0 iU>1 M: ¡(D Irt¡ :t-'-( it'i 'OJ : trt, HD I . ;0 q-l-¡H · ....:- iN'!::¡ , ! f-' P¡ f 0 :::J :ro ;~ !¡-.. HD ., ~rt' i::J 1m It/: :~ ~n- :(D ten I. ' it;J lQ ¡PJ '(J)' .,! ~ '. p_...J ¡ CD UJ !n- f CD , !O : .:, !; j , 'f;' " I . . 'í; ¡ ; & t . : ¡ , : ~: j lV' f f--I: ¡ W, 1--': l\...)! U1: , W: f F\.)J LV!rv 'r: ....'-...1.' ....tv,l. ....~ :: ....t\J ;...'" !....W J t\J ! 0: f\..).' ~; tv 00 C); U1! 0: .......J ~ 00 ~ ~ \ tv; 00 ~ W' o')! Ul ! ~ . , ~..... ~.... ..... :, ..... '.... ..... ,... ..... ..... ..... -- "' ~,~ ro'O~'~O,OiOjO OO.D~D 0'0 00 8·0 ~ 0000;0 Q 0·0 Q 00 aD O:O.O'O:Q:O'OO 0 000'0'0'000 O.Oio O;OQOO,O.O.O,jO:O;O;OiO~O,o;o.o!o.o 010:00,0;0;0:0 ! . f I : ., ,,'., . fl. . . ! J f' J: I; ~ i j Ii I ' · ! j i!; ¡ I I ';, ~ i 01 tJ1 00 o 0') 0 000 I . ~ 1 --' ;~, , i w-...J U1 --,.( ¡N:m;W:N'~N~01NCOO :v ; 0 :... ~ " ....... v ~ '" N .I"\.)~, 10'm ;0:0;00;01000 U1 ~U1' !001 ~O!O'O:C),ooC) 0 0·0: fO'O!C):o'o,C);oöoo ' ~" ! ! ! ¡ j I j ¡ t JI ! (N: 01' ;--t, ~: I"\.) .;01: 0 -...I W r : I :00:1"\.) ~ I ..þ v ; '" ; V !.., 0 . <:) v V I... rv O:O-.......,JW J 'I O-.......,J: ~ 0 ;0 0010' 00' c:x:::>' 0 :O¡ 00,0 '00; C?=> 0 C> -Þ o 1 'N: -.l:--,! ,U1 01 ..þ · I '~-' I i I I;...! I '" I I I I I I I I o -'0 '-.....J N:ú,;oW·O 0 00 (Jì 00 <:) ,0 0 N -.......J 0 <:) 0 W I ~ I c....."ì t..~ 0: I 01 I I 0 I 0 I I I " , 01 ° 1 I . r C) p 0 o:o~ 10 '0, ,0, (:) o~ 0: i ! I f i ' , I I I f 1 j il,. ; '--I; ; ,¡ : 1'0 '--I' ·W:........N Ul ; W N ' '...J f\.);-'.N.........;W N'ON'---'NooO Ul 0 -.......,JOO:. I D:>ww : ",. v ! '" ... À.# .... . ... j '" ... I V '" '" ... ... '" '" : ... : 0 -0... '" " U1 I........, ():) 0 01; <.J1: 0010 0; 0,0 000 0 0 0 0 C> I . 0 C).~ DiDO ° O'O;OOlO;O!OO,O'OOb 0,00000:0 0:000:0'0'0'010'0:00;0'000 :0, ° 0.0' 0.',. :op' t ';; ¡ . í I ! ¡ Ii f: ¡ t!; I t '; ¡ ¡: I' j i f i ':! i I I I i Ii ¡ i. ; I'" i ' -' i--' -.J :--' f -.J ¡ ---' ¡-' 1--' : ---': --'; ~ -' ~ i ---';-...1 ~ ; --' i --J ---': --' I ~ I --' ~ : i o 100 ,O~O!O~OloIO'O; 000 jO;Op Ie:>; 0 Doloo oak.!); ° !OO o:o;O¡OIOIO¡o'c>¡op ¡OiQp 10; q 0.01 I .1 tOOjO ¡ I ~ 1 ; I ; i ¡ t Ii: t i /1 If : ¡ ; ; i 1 I If t ! I I I' f I ; f -.J N ; N : I t I :1 ~. ! · · I · 'I I , I , I f I ; . i' I, I i I I.; I ~ I j I ~ v ! I .. ~! 0,00 ·ofO!o¡o.oIO¡O; aop /o:oP 10, <:) o~0100 c)C>im; I ¡ I ;1 ; I ! I i I ~ I i'l I I i I ¡ 1:1 1 I' 'I !' i I! I ¡ I :0 c> : I : I ;0 ; J t t ! I I ! i I : " ¡ : I ,0 ìC) q ; · t " . t ! f' ,. J I ~ ! i ¡ f ! !! t I i 1 ; . ¡ . t ¡ , t ¡ 0) I... I owo I 0 I C> WN U1 .,~ 00 00 00 ; ...J~ 00 00 I I do I I z~ ~ n~ ,....., I~ ~ Z C >- :j o z L- ;:: ~::> > ~ _r ~: ~:' c C r :j C ..., ::J v; ~ ~ ::; c CJ CT: ,.... :J ~ ::. Lì n 9 ~b g _< 0. t-..> ~ ~ ~'), ~:3 ...., n C u v: r- 0r- ~ -J - ,-... v' ;; C r:... ~ (t ~' ;S ~ -. 0 r:-: v' n ;;T.; \;J ~ r"\ V 0= Z ~ -, ,-' /: T.. U') :z: m m -; t.r C t;..; z >- ,..., Z :::::;- v (1:. ~ ~ r:--; 7= --{ " n I ~ ~ . ~ I :;: 0 tJ ;=-= 0 > n -< c: ~ ~ m Z Z ~ ~ n [') 0 '.J :J D ~ W :: .-J Q":¡ ~ ~ c;- c.. c: c n ;' - >~ r- \.-: -, ~s ~ o -, ~ -.J t;..J ro ...J :::¡ t.J (t ~ t:J (¡: r:: eve -, C:.. :::: 0 (þ ::J -, > -. .~ I ~~' c I ~~. or. < ~ I I ~¡ :3 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 0 CD :3 v, :3 r.; "< E u v ;:. r¡ _ V> r,.¡ 5 ~ 0 .... r; =" ~ ? Oë; 0(; ., .... ~~ , S -~ --fZ;:: °0° > u >- > ~c:~8 ;:: m \: "'; +>-~ n ;;r.:: -c v . 'v_ !:: r- =.~~~ () I 0 o~ ---! 0 n n -1 m > ~ r":"1 n -r; ---i 0 ;:::: -i 0 0 0 C) c ~ --i Z Z ,¡,ç. " 0 ~ !J :N 0 Z º01 > C U1 --{ s: m . t m nw (:) ~ --; --' --' m ~CI: /:j - 0)- Zl I . U1 7,.·c 9~ 00 J ~ 0 w > - ,.... r-zz 0 ~ I ~lñn . '-J 2m D:> 0 "-' t-J C ;:z: ~ ,. ~. -....J -4 » Z W > ~ ;; ~ c: IT! V> =:>- r ;:;> ?:~ - - r.- _ ~c r::; .; ~. Zz ~ Ó r:- p; z V) - - c . ~ Cr; -:-: f'. >ž ;1:_ r·- :CZ -:c ;;> r: =. ~c - z ',J r.r. v.; ~ U"r:;; 7 r:- -- ~ . -r Ò> :;.-::, -= 7.;;:: ...þ. Ul (X) o o o >:- <~ r~ zC:: ~'-' ~,-. > v: w Q) o 0) o z · C... --¡:::: C> Z (; ~ ~ "-J (j) U1 o \.0 CO o \# W Ul o c c;..; I -... ~ '-J c::. . ,-- "... W . h.) f'..) o \.D OJ .. rc1:M ~ .~r-'U) ¡~j(D 0 W.O :T rt:rT PJ (D:~ ::s H ¡~, -J- !~ !() 0 ;PJ ,OJ f (() : t--' ' j-J 'rt , I~ ' f Õ '0 ~O tJ ;~ ·PJ .~ ! , ¡ i N;W¡O"\ , ~:V1!O " .... - 0,0'0 0'0 0 :O,O¡O NN-Þ ~0)U1 DNa 0(.]10 DOC> I ........, N 0\6 .' 00 00 00 . NWUl ·..þW~ ~ : \6 aNa 0010 000 ¡ ~~~ o <""l U1 Qc -.. W I . ~ I ~ O-.....JO I U1 0 90 .. 2rr- ~ V> n <:r >::::: r- L,., ~§ o > ~ .... =:r:: ~ < t:.; c V" v. ~ ~ o I ~ ~ ~ 7:" -' - t,.; n ro v. m ~ m o > ~ Q c ë g. r: <- o~ C ï.. ~~ o >~ _---Jz> C?OO~ ~D~O +~O3: -r. ';:::0-0 -mmr- om ~ r:-. o ê) 0 +è' [) -reo -0> 7:::> CyZ Z --.!v;n =r:- ;;:r: I"'M ---J ;;: Z > (') rn »> c :; r. >- r; [..; 0 >- nc- c ~ ~ ;:: r", C z c >- == o z () o z ~ o m v, () :7.' ::j ~ ~ lr. g V1 V" o ucr:~ ~ ro ~ CJ n 0 ~ ~ g -< nt~ PJ:~> n C 3~ r.r. c n r- ~ t.: n ~ ~ 0 ~ ë¡ 2 < r.: ~ -- m m "'""'i U) - -i o z ex; o -n ~ ~ /:. 7.. v 0 Z þ !'D :oJ > C;-.- r, Z r: 0 """"t ...... C:- n r:, Ii": t- ~ ;;:; ;:j ~ -,- ~ 0,; ro ~ t:.J ~ (; 0' v¡ """"t Q.. o D o n c: $: r-,-., z -; C) '.J a -w (þ , , "" o ~ :Þ s: m --' ro ~ -, o ;;:::: ro ...J -J v; ;; ~ ~ m Z ...-1 n o PJ'- G -- ~ --< n; -0 U --::::- ~ ::: ~ > [) ~» fi'ìv"V ;;::-0-0 air- -J onn ni » n ., --i -1 -oj ;;::;00 (J)-i~zz ;g°:7"oz OU1U1>C '- ~b~ 3: --t --t.. w m ;;c ;:::; n ,. :r m 0,' I I Z co (X) U1 o OO~ o I (X) "-J <:) LV -> CJ rr. ~ f-' "-.1 o -r. w >- n m v: e e e ) ., ~~ ~ KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas May 19, 1980 . Mr. Charles W. Williams, City Manager City of North Richland Hills . 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Subject: 3-200, CITY OF NORTH ,RICHLAND HILLS, GLENVIEW" DRIVE RIGHT ~OF-~iAY , MAPS REVIEt-1 ' We have revi ewed the ri ght-of-way and easement maps prepa red by' Freese' and Nichols, Consulting Engineers, which have been submitted to our offi ce for approval and recommendation of payment. We cannot speak to the matter of the original agreement for the 70/30 split, but the , general magnitude of cost seems reasonable for the right~of-way maps submitted. We would recommend payi.ng the $3,419.50 as requested by the enclosed letter from the City of Ri'chland Hills unless there is a question concerning the 70/30 obligation. The enclosed invoi'ce for preparation of the Calloway Branch Channel easements totals $2,744.13. The Calloway Branch Chqnnel eqsement map shows fifteen (15) parcels from Richland Hills and one '(1) parcel from North Richland Hills. On this basis 94% of the cost of preparation of thi s map waul d be attri buted to acqui ri,ng ri ght-of-way from Richland Hills, or $2,579.48, while only 6% of the tot~l cost, or $164.65 would be associated with North Richland Hills easement requirements." Also enclosed is an invoice for preparation of the Glenview Drive easements which totals $2,140.87. The two (2) Glenview Drive right-.of-way maps show a total of 38 parcels required from the North. Richland Hills side, which represents 35% of the total, or $749.30. A total of 72 parcels is shown for the Richland Hills side, which represents 65% of th.e total, or,$1,391.57. On the basis of the proportioning method outlined above, North Richland Hills· cost' for preparation of the enclosed right-af-way maps would be $913.95 as compared to $3,419.50 which represents 70% of th,e total cost~ If we can be of further service in this regard, please advise, a:/dd-W~ -(I~ ALBIN, P. E. RWA:bvg Enclo'sures cc: Honorable Dick Farqm, Mayor Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities R=c=rt/r:..'~~) tl .. r.:t 2 -. ~ (' . " ~ 'I 1;-\ 'l'11-r\/ f ~, _ \ ~ v~11 ~:J'. 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367 e e -- COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWA YS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER-DIRECTOR B, L. DEBERRY -0- A. SAM WALDROP, CHAIRMAN DEW ITT C. GREER RAY A, BARNHART _e_ P. O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, Texas 76115 June 5, 1980 M B6ll(1) Control 1978-1-14 Tarrant County FM 1938 IN REPLY REFER TO FILE NO. Mr. Charles Williams, City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. Williams: Enclosed for your consideration and possible execution are two copies of a proposed agreement in connection with the construction of the above project. Subject to your concurrence, both copies should be properly executed and returned to this office at the earliest possible date. A warrant in the amount of $527,400., made payable to the State Treasurer, Account of Trust Fund No. 927, should accompany the return of these agreements. In the event of a refund, resulting from an overpayment, we will require your Vendor Identification Number. The assignment of the number is made by the Office of the State Comptroller and any questions you may have regarding the number assignment should be directed to: State Comptroller Revenue Processing Division Lyndon B. Johnson Office Building III East 17th Austin, Texas 78711 Attention: Vendo~ File Section After both copies of this agreement have been executed by the State, the duplicate original will be returned to you for your file. Your prompt attention to this matter is necessary to prevent any delay in the project. Yours very truly, JWN:bc Enclosures 1 ' --i-- i ;,:{, )(, 5(/:L(;-ri.Ü! v Y J. R. Stone District Engineer e e e - - .~ Þl B611(1) 1978-1-14 Tarrant County STATE OF TEXAS I I I COUNTY OF TRAVIS THIS AGREEÞŒNT, made this day of , 1980, by and between the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, here~nafter called the "City", Party of the First Part, acting by and through its City Council and the State of Texas, hereinafter called the "State", Party of the Second Part, acting by and through its State Highway and Public Transportation Commission. WHEREAS, the City desires the construction of continuous curb, gutter, storm sewers, adjustment of utilities and incidental items within the limits from 0.14 mile north of Emerald Hills Way to Spur 452 (State Highway No. 26) on Farm to Market Road No. 1938, which is solely the City's responsibility and the City has requested the State to construct or have constructed this work. The State will construct or have constructed this work for and on behalf of the City and at the City's sole expense, excluding preliminary engineering. The estimated construction cost of this work is Five Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand Four Hundred and No/IOO Dollars ($527,400.00), including contingencies and construction engineering, and HHEREAS, the City by the execution of this agreement agrees to the terms and conditions of Commission Minute No. 72147, as it applies to the City, a copy of which is attached hereto and marked "Exhibit A" and made a part of this agreement. 1. e e e , '! ~;C~~ T:tLRErp~.;.p._ ~~ t~ ....;=:,~,,~:.:;: '..-'- ! ~ :, ":. ~ .¡~ ;,: A..... '\ .. -"I ....;\\.._ ':' be constructed, by the Stat',~ :,~,~ ~:'~~.. ,'t:.·.. ....'i.:~ ~·:-~'ì:-::..:..:.í:. ~";' ~:~,~ ~,¡~{," -,:,.,.,':.,.,.....,., I it,'.'.. ,~~ I'.',,·."······..·.,'·.··.·. I' ì." ~ ~¿ I II I , ! í with the return of this agr~èmènt ~ ~-:'l~Cllrl~d h:, t1'1l· C1 ty ~ a ~...,·.).rr.1nt or check made payable to the State Treasurer, Account of Trtlst Fund No. 927 in the amount of Five Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand Four Hundred and No/lOa Dollars ($527,400.00), to be used in paying for the proposed work required by the City in the City of North Richland Hills. It is further understood that the State will construct only those items for the City as requested and required by the City and the entire cost of such items, excluding preliminary engineering, will be borne by the City. If the State elects to receive bids and if upon receipt of bids by the State and/or the actual con- _ struction and/or approved changes in the contemplated improvements it is found that this amount is insufficient to pay the City's portion, then the City upon request of the State will forthwith supplement this amount by an amount equal to the City's full estimated or actual share of the cost of this work less the amount previously paid into Trust Fund No. 927. In the event the amount as paid is more than the actual cost, then the excess amount will be returned to the City. It is further understood that the work to be done on behalf of the City, as herein provided~ will include the cost of contingencies and construction engineering. It is further understood that the City by the execution of this agreement agrees to the terms and conditions of Commission Minute No. 72147, as it applies to the City, a copy of which is attached hereto and marked "Exhibit A" and made a part of this agreement. 2, IN TESTIMONY \~EREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents e to be executed in duplicate on the day above stated. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Party of the First Part By: rIa yo r By: Member of City Council By: Member of City Council By: Member of City Council By: Member of City Council e e 3" STATE OF TEXAS STATE HIGHWAY )ND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION C011MISSION Party of the Second Part Certified as being executed for the purpose and effect of activating and/ or carrying out the orders, established policies, or work programs heretofore approved and authorized by the State Highway and Public Transportation Commission: By:_ Asst. Engineer-Director under authority of Commission Minute 70104 Recommended for execution: (State) Director, Finance , e City of JX8rth RichIand Hills, Texas , ¡ ~ .,. ,." '../ -<1 _.:_C 7~ :~:- Cc_ June 2, 1980 PUBLIC NOTICE e The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, will conduct a work session on June 5, 1980,6:00 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. ITEMS ON THE AGENDA FOR CONSIDERATION: 1. Discussion of assessments on Davis Blvd. 2. Discussion on Precinct Line Contract 3. Discussion of 1980 C.I.P. Program for Rufe Snow Drive 4. Discussion of appointments to various Boards and Commissions *5. Discussion of pending litigation *closed to the public due to the subject matter. J~daA~~ ~ Dick Faram - Mayor ~ e (817) 281-0041 /7301 N. E. LOOP 820/ P. O. BOX 18609/ NOBTH RICHLAI\JD HILLS, TEXAS 76118 ii' I e City· of JXðrth Richland Hills, Texas ! ¡ \ 3J I \¿í -,_:--,-,--- k'-=-=--~:- - - t21f\ -- . MEMO TO: Charles W. Williams City }ianager FROM: Dennis Horvath . Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: June 2, 1980 SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Commission Members The Parks and Recreation Commission currently has tvlO vacancies created by the resignation of Mr. Jody Williams and the expired term of Mr. Bill Polster. At this time we do not have sufficient profile sheets on perspective members. I ask your recommendations for the name of potential members. Recomnendations and final selections will be made when sufficient applicants are screened. e Q,t/?/J1/._/:JJy¿J4J 1)ennls Hor~¿ftÌl Director of Parks and Recreation pc e (817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118 · ,- e City of ~(órth Richland Hills, Texas \Jlkt . ~.~~~~-===~ --~¡'~;r- ,y \1 r""' v TOI\.~i\1Y PAU L CITY MANAGER fi1Etf10 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS F RO~)1 : DATE: TOM PAUL - CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: MAY 13, 1980 1980 C.I~P PROGRAM - RUFE SNOW DRIVE e Needless to say, these specifications attached will need to be reduced so \~Je can affor'd Rufe Sno\'J Or'ive. I have discussed this with Richard Albin, and he has agreed that reductions can be made on this project~ This item definitely needs to be discussed at our next vJork Session. ~J Thomas Paul City r':lanager pdb Attachments e -::7 I I , i I .1 , " I I I ! I i I I e e e KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas ;' ~ a y 12, 1980 H()nJrab l·~ ;Þ;a.yor (.t Ci t.y Coune i 1 Cit,y of i'forth ni r:h 1 and Hi 11 s /3(11 n.E. Loop 820 r.;orth Richlans~ Hills) Texas 75118 Subject: 3-315, 19~~O C" I . r. P~OGDllJ:, -r¿-tt FE S ~ ~ ~~ì~.:' n n I v E In accordanc¡2 \;.Jith YO~lr ìnstructi:)TlS, ~'r~ :-;:1'/;:; ~H'" u':1r~~:i co~t 2stiflates for Heco!ls truct; on, of Pu fe Sno\;i nr i ve fr():~; LI)oO 20 to '.'!ci tauq:1 !lri ve and fro:'"} :j!atauga Driv8 to F(1'ir~eà,jo\! nriy~. Th::~ d~s qn ';fi:jths and s2ctions used in these cost e5tinat:~s ~rr b;!s~d on r¡~C0;'i.;·::~:->jat;:)ns pY'f?:sent:~d in t¡l~ uThof()u'lhfa)"e Plðn f!)f' ~!Dr~h C~~ntr··¿,l T~~X':}SH ~H"c~D·)r::)d hy th-:~ ~ Gt~th C t ~ n t r a ~I T t'? X a s C 0 ~J n c i 1 0 f ~ 0 v (~ in:--"1 ~"\ ~ t s, L G C J 1 C i t i :~:; a ~ ~ c! C [) U n t i ~ S) ;l n d t~H:~ Sti1t(~ Cepdrt::lt~1t of r!ì:~}h!.~ ?y~~ ai'ì/1 D~J{"\lic TI"'::-¡,nsn:J}~t-~tíon. P u f c S "1 L L' h ':1 S b~: (? r~ ,.! ~. ~ s .; c n :1 t ~>;'-~ {.:, :) (~ t ~ it C ~l e d T:1 Q f () U :) h -f :~l r z.~ ;':1?;~ "-1 ,;, i) to s~~ct i l)nS tJs:;d i n th~\ tens tr:,Jct i a~} .~' " '1 nUl' 1\ ¡.. -~ ~,~ r i :i 1 ù S T;:~ f'J 11 (1!;¡ !1r! td~) 1 ~ S hOtn¡ on th~ s h Q ~t! S t h 2 S t {~e 2 t c ) s~: e ::; -r:i ; ~ :~, t.:: s : , :,'; T :.~ :~~ ¡~~ T '!, .) .3:;;~ ~ '-T: ~ .r\~¡ E; -~ i~ r: -¡" i T HIe !,~ ,. 1 ¡~ S .; L1;:ITS !"I I ~",T:ì ~ECTln:,; U I nT~ f ---- ............~-------. ~--------.....~ Lo;;\) ~1~,,?:1 to St. L. :~) :,!. f( e n.. ., ,-. " 1.. ",-. ' J 'i7L: 0r t 10/S ,) :) : 7 j J t:) r:- t In/:, ~ ) ,.J t , -'" .) ~ j l) ~J Sl , 10/6 St. L,. ~ u. ~-~ . ~1. to 'lû tau~.1a ::r"i \Ie 1 nn Watatraa Jrive to r a i r;-·v:.~ a .-L:J ~~ Dr i v 2 0:] riQTES: (1) n in·:) t" !\ r 't e )" i a 1 S2V;:~!1 La n r~s ~JnJ i vi dt:?d (1 conti nuous tu rn 1 1 qc) q - 7 ::: U .- (2) Width based on 12 foot lanes (3) lO-inches of asphal t paVef1f:nt 6 - i n c h e S 0 f s tab i 1 i zed sub ~1 r ~ ;l~~ (Pave!'1ent design assunes averag~ suhgrad~! conditinns) ,'t: ... ....',.; '.::, ,. '-' ,jI'4 ¡\'~ ~.{ 1 ~ç ~:;; ,~:... ..,:...~~ 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367 r,1ayor & City Council ~ nay 12, 1980, Page 2 e The total estimated construction cost for Rufe Snow from loop 820 to Watauga Orive ;s $3)81B,735~ \1lh;ch includes an allo\-/ance for utility act jus tments, 5 ton1 dra i naqe, right-of-way and des ign cas ts. The esti- r1a ted cas t of Ru f e Sno~1 frOtl Urt tauq(i Dri ve to Fa i t"\Fteado'~;, Or i ve i 5 $2,165~392. Th(~ attached tabulatiòns sho\/ the unit costs used in these estina t~~s. For purposes of cOPlpat~ison \'1;th other ctr~~a streets, it -is noted that G r (1 p e vi n e Hi 9 h\.1 ay i saP 5 Use c t ion ~ (p tin c i pal art e ria 1, 5 1 è n 0 S ) ~ although the nThoroughfar-e Pl?2nlJ t'ecQí'1r1ends (t 7 lane und-ìvided or a 6 lane divided section. ~~ith referenc(; to paVÜ;;;2nt thickness, Rufe Sno\, south of Loop 820) Glenv;2\-¡, and Har\'lOod Road \'/2re all constructed with 6-inchcs of asphalt on 6-inches of stahilized subgrade. The Highiday f1cpartr,lent is planning to reconstruct navis ~)oulevdr~j 'dith l¿~-in(~hes of asphalt on 8-inches of crushed stO'l2. He \,} i 11 b t~ a va i 1 a b 1 e to d i s C us s t h E~ see s t i íl ate S VI i t h ~Vo u a t ,you r~ co nv en i en c e . e '~WI D' ~¡'/l · · , \ ; t) J C cc: ~lr. Tho~\1aS Paul, City' j'-!anager e r'1ayor &. City Council t nay 12, 1930, Page 3 e RUFE snow DRIVE COST ESTlf1ATES LOOP 820 TO WATAUGA DRIVE f';inor j\rteri~l (~'!7U) - 7 Lanes Undivided .l\ s S tJrl e Sa; 1 C D ~ :: :1. p j~ y ITf']~ Unclassified Stre~t EXCðvatio~ 'L ,.. r'1-:') '\'? It ,.!J / '~ v , ,,-, ..... ~ , ..... I :Sit l ;r1~ Tt"eatr~ri SuoJrade C'Jrb an·d Gutt(~r ~tI T_ype 11 D" H~1i\C ,+ It TY;)f~ u.c~ u ~F ~,lj\C (~If T:.¡pe It!\ fI ~r vi,e e Tim2S 1.10 Factor for Light L ~ vel 0 f l\ ,;1 j :1 C ~ n t n ~ vel f);):: e ~1 t P[~~ L.F. [l! ~f\!!T 1. T,( 5.5 C.Y. n . 11 S l' 0 n s q.~)0 S.Y41 '7' L.F. c:: v .~.. . . ~n~~ IT COST ~ 6.50 j D . (~n :.?S 7 r)() . r. :.,' l~. . I~ f) o ') f) (, f . ..) '." n.3:') . .. . . . It . . . . . . . . T;;T'es 1.t~5 Factor for r~f)r~~lal Dra i :1:lqe ;~equ i r~~r;lents Plus Design, Layout, Ins~~ction Testing, and Right-of-\r3~J Costs :1. [1:) '1.1n s.Y. S.Y. 'J . f,; G Sub-Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Per linear Foot Cost . . . . TC)T í\L COST ~' '~1·~.?5 n "?() ..J . __ t. . (1.S1 1--+.40 '1':1. f) n 74__70 7 c~ . 3 t) -...--- . $?Rl.Ol 3 f)~) . {) 1 ~1¿~f). 21 89.54 . :)537.85 TOTt\l CO:fSTRUCrIO:·J COST :: 7.100 L.F. x $S37.BS/l.F. e :: $3,!:18,735 ~'~ayor & Ci t.y Counci 1. t1a.y 12, 1980 t Page 4 e RUFE SNOW DRIVE COST ESTIMATES NATNJGA O~IVE TO FAIRMEADOW DRIVE ¡"ti nor Arter; a 1 (~~5!J) - 5 lanes Und i vi ded Assume Soil CDR = 4 PAY IT81 PEf~ L.F" .D.: r;'~iT I TV Unclassified Street Excavation L i t1e (24 7' / s . y . ) 6 II L ; ~":1e Trea tt~d Sub~~raje Curb and Gutter 2:1 TV:Jf! "0" Ht,~¡\C 4 II Type It /\U H\i!\C 4 n T.yp(~ It ,t\ II ~'~>1:~C /:'.5 C.Y. o . 0 ') 3 T () ;\~ S :1.8q s. Y. 2 L.F. 5.3J S.Y. 6.33 S.Y. ~.8J S.y. e Sub-Total. Tin:es 1. 10 Factor fat L i Jht Lev~~ 1 of/~djacent D~v21 oom'2nt . . . . . . . . . . . . . Times 1.20 Factor for Light Drainage Requirements. . . . !ì ;.,! I T r:JST $ f).50 :JQ.tlD 2.25 7.20 4. '1·0 ,,1.3t) 3.30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plus Design, Layout Inspection Tt~sting and Ri9ht-of-Ua.y Costs . . . . . . Total Per Line3r Foot Cost. . . . TOT J\l C~,};'!STRUCT I 1~! COST . . . TOTAL COST $ 29.25 6.64 15.50 1!.~.40 27.35 5~.5/~ 57.19 . $203.3ì 223.71 263.45 53.59 . )322 .l,~ ::: 6,725 L.F. x $322.11/L.F. = $2~166,391.50 e e THOROUGHFARE PLAN for NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS Prepared for North Central Texas Council of Governments Local Cities &:. Counties : . i t ¡e ~ and State Department of Highways and Public Transportation : ! ~ ; J Prepared by , ì - . Carter &. Burgess Inc. , r Pinnell-Anderson-Wilshire &. Associates, Inc. ~ ~ ;. Marvin Springer &:. Associates I Ie April, 1977 e THOROUGHFARE PLAn FOR nORTH cenTRAL TEXAS APRIL 1977 fREeWAYS PRinCIPAL ARTERIALS minOR ARTERIALS œ~:;=» SELECTED COLLECTORS ............. DESIGN STANDARD M 7 U - MINOR ARTERIAL 6 TRAFFIC LANES-, I 1 CONTINUOUS LEFT TURN LANE =r .* CONTINUOUS * PARKWAY LANE . LANE . LAH£ TURN LANE LANE . LANE . LANE PARKWAY - 10' Min. 331- 361 ~ 111-13' .... 331-361 101 Min. 13J '.. 36- ... 12' 36' ....... 13' r - 971 (+) ,I ~ ~~ (7; A fl --- ~ r"'~"."'_'.~ 110 Bolder numbers denote recommended standard DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Number Traffic lanes Lane Widths (feet) 4IÞRi9ht-of-Way Width (feet) Design Speed (M.P.H.) 1 Grade· (percent) Stopping Sight Distance2 (feet) 3 . Horizontal Curvature (degr~es) Vertical Clearance (feet) .. . , Lateral Clearance (feet) Continuous left Turn lane Width (feet) Capacity (vpd): 30.000 MInimum Desirable Recommended 6 6 6 1 1 , 1 2 I 1 2 . 9 7 I 1 0 9 I 1 1 0 . ...... .................................. ................................................. . ..........................................................", 35-4 5 35 ........................................ . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . .. .. . . ............................................. . ................ <0....................... ......................................... .. ...........................................,... . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .....................oo.........oo....oo...oo.... .. ,...........oo...........oooo................... . .................................... . 0 5 Mi n 7 Max 5 - 7 ( + ) . . . 2 50- 32 5 30 0- 4 2 5 30 0- 42 5 ..... -........ -........ . .......................................... . .......................................... .. ............................................... .. 7 1 ·........····..·....·.....···.........oo... . 0 3 5 ::.:::::::::: ~: ::=:::::~:::::;::::::::::::::::: ::;=:=:::: - ...oo......................................, . . . ............................................. .. '.'.',., ...' ...............oo................................ . ........................................ .. 1 5 I 1 5 I ( + ) 1 5 . ( + ) 2 I 6 . 6 I 1 1 I 1 3 I 1 3 I I NOTES: . 1 Standard used depends upon type of terra in and des ign speed. 2Standard used depends upon design speed and perception/reaction time. 3Standard used depends upon design speed and extent of superelevation. ~Effective capacity is reduced with any lateral clearance less than 6'. *See Parkway Design Considerations. 4IÞ 146 · DESIGN STANDARD M 5 U ~. MINOR ARTEAlAL. 4 TRAFFIC LANES. - 1 CONTINUOUS LEFT TURN LANE - ---~-¡ S ~ e * PARKWAY LANE . LANE 10' Min. 221- 24' 15 24 ~ CONTINUOUS TURN LANE 111-13' 12 7~'+ 90 * LANE . LANE PARKWAY 22'-24' 10' Min. 24 15' Bolder numbers denote recommended standard DESIGN ELEMENT STANDARD Number Traffic Lanes lane Widths (feet) Right-af-Way Width (feet) ~eSign Speed (M.P.H.) 1 Grade (percent) Stopping Sight Distance2 (feet) 3 Horizontal Curvature (degrees) Vertical Clearance (feet) lateral Clearance It (feet) Continuous left Turn lane Width (feet) M I nlmum Desl rable Recommended 4 4 4 1 1 I 1 2 I 1 2 . 7 5 I 8 5 , 9 0 . . . . . . . . 0. . . . ~ . . . . " ....... 3 5 )f\tt/ft/Wt?Hft 3 5- 4 5 ............................ . ............................ . 0 . 5 Mi n . 7 Max . 5 - 7 ( ± ) 2 5 0- 3 2 5 3 0 0 - 4 2 5 3 0 0 - 42 5 ................................. . ............... -. -... ........ ,......................................... . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . ................,........................... . ................................................. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. , . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. .. . .................................................... .. 7 0 1 .. .. . . . .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . ........................................... . 3 5 .................................................. . .................................................. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . - .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .................................................. .. .............................................o.. .. ......................................o...... . ............................................ . ................................................. . ..... ............................. 1 5 , 1 5 I ( + ) 1 5 I ( + ) 2 I 6 I 6 . 1 1 I 1 3 I 1 2 I Capacity (vpd): 20,000 NOTES: . IStandard used depends upon type of terrain and design speed. 2Standard used depends upon design speed and perception/reaction time. 3Standard used depends upon desi9n speed and extent of superelevation. 4Effective capacity is reduced with any lateral clearance less than 61. *See Parkway Design Considerations. e 148 -- --------.--.---- ---.- ---...-.----- 3: -i 0 :z --I -f -i » -i r- C/) » e » II <J) ('"') :: OJ ~ e ~~ ~CJ1 IIIþt C - :;: ~~ Cùc -sa- I~ $:z Zo 0:0 JJ» »:IJ :0-1 -;m m:o :0> >r r .. .. e c Oz ZO m- < :Eo »m -< 0 ~ ~ :::. ~ - ~ » en -U I J> r --I -U » < m ~ m z --I o o z en --I :D c: o --I - o z en '--I » Z o » JJ o ---- " . ~ =-- :JIÞ >- ~ ~ (,.'.) ~ ~ -c ----a -a -0 :::c ::z: :x: :z: =-- >- >- =-- r- r- r- !::; -.. -4 ....., ~ t:C CD c;,) c:: >- :.- c::: CD Co;:) c;,) ::a co ,.,., ("T1 .." :»- :III- en C'"':) c:'") ~ M1ggm C"':) ::c ::0 ~ «::) c,.-, ~ c::::» c:::,.,.,,.,.,;; ~IIII~ ,." - II ~. II C) U1 t-..) . :r--: C) r- >- ~ - Go-') =-- æ: -a (¡;) r- r"1 ::c ~ >- :::c ;:-4,-,.. ", ~ -4 r- ,.,., --t ~~~oo ,." ,..,., CD :Þ- ::Þo C'J ~ c;,) ...... =- ,.,., ,.." c,...r) (.I':) ~C:tTI~ CD c;:) (.'.) t:C c-:» c:: c:: >- 0 ::0 ~ c:,...) c: c;,) CXJ m :::0 ,.,., ::a- ~ (..;,),-....,.,.,~ m -t :»- ~ -- rr1 rO c:: <: >- r- ,." :z ('"') -< ..,., Þ- (") --I o ^' en ':II -0 " ." -+= (j1 ~ c: c: c:= .. I I -000- ,.: =0 -... :: -0 W .... I 0') / I I -I (I) CA) 0") = /'), / 3:: toV \ / >-.. \ >< - ~, -' ,.. e e e L ~ III III !è II >- a:: <{ ~ ~ ::> (I) t- V) o o W f- <t :E I- en w z o I- a.. 0:: u c" w £:) I- - o _ LaJ - ~ . ~ ~: r 0. z .... f- en o o >- « :: c <t o e:: -, ---- ,,- U U C - .- 0'0 oCt ò: ~ " . -- o .. e 0 =u .. LtJ o Õ ~ :) . ~ en 0' ~ = .; -~ ~ :. ò ü; ô z .C~ ::,,,,'0 o ..-- ::I I- 3: -~ . . --I: ~-; 0 u.J..J E o at â (Ø G.. òa ~ '0 = U C:J -~~ - .. Uc -0 Cl)U t .. a ~ ~ :.J ø .!: ... . . ~ ~ - :- 0 ~ &&J ci û) I ~ . .;. c: o : .. z ¡ Ü Ü ~ ~ _ Ü) ~ ; o cØ : '0 .. Ü; -;; tú ~ : ~ o to.. E ;. ~ Õ C:.r;. 0_ -- "'0 '0_ ~i f- " U I: W : -:. .. o I: LrJ a:: 0....... Cl. ;: 0 u l- lL. e "0 o ~ ~ IJ.J ~ ~ n. ~.: ç ž i 0000 .1:. I:v 0-- ..J~ o a : ., ~ ~ < ~ : ~<'O'O: -: ~ · 0 t- a.!! A-; <t o.~:. U - :. . .. 0:'; :'0 ..J~CC~ ::;) I I ..J'I _. « ~.";'S :J '; 0 0 ~:~ G::G: Z . . . . W _.__ e) ZZI&IW DOOD z o .... <{ ..J ::> U ..J ex: U I I- :z LaJ ¿ t- (/) ¡I 94 m j ~ ... E o ~ . cO( I ~ .. o ~ U Õ o &&. ... o . ~ ..J .. .. Q. C - .. .Q e - .. ; ~ u '0 0 ct La. c . E Q, o .. ~ .. o c: .. u .!. '0 C õ .. JÞ . ..J o o ... o . c: -- - to.. .. a. - .. o U ø' C :. a CL o - ..:. . It) o ..: :: Ot -- ..l 4( ~ - ~ 'õ .... o rt) - , 10 - ..:. - c: 5 E C- o ~ :. ., "Þ õ ... D Ct. . D ... . '0 o :E I CD .,. . .I:. CI' C ., ..J )( ~ - It) It) - o "it C .. e Ct. 2 ., > ., "'0 = :I - ... . " . X , U ... . =/ )( .... c: - ë ~ ... ; 0 =ã u < if. I õ ~ .. o . c - .. .. ~ ;- .. .. o U .. CI' a c ~ o cØ -;: CI' c: > o Q. .. CI' 2- c &J ~ &J 0.. ., CIiIt 1:7 C o Ò - .. - ..... - )( - ... .0 N - &. '" ..J ~ o o N .. o ... o ø ø c -; o 0.. u . o 0.. It) ~ .; - o E o z ~ o o rt) .. o U .I:. - ., '" " c co ~ .J - )( - ~ -.+ o ~ N . o ~ >- > o ., X I ~ o o ~ . It) ~ ... . - f . ¿ a: o LL. W ..... « ~ - t- CI) W f- CI) o () >- <C ?: c <C o æ , , I I . o ,- W l- e( ...J CL --~ e e e ~ City of Hurst, Texas May 28, 1980 Mr. Chuck Williams City Manager City of No. Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 No. Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Chuck: Re: Precinct Line Road Widening- Project No. 118-ST Attached are three copies of the Three Way Contract for engineering of Precinct Line Road north of Grapevine Highway. The Contract has been approved and signed by the Commissioners Court. Your favorable action on this Contract will begin the engineering for the future improvement of this road and the early, donation of needed rights-af-way. Please call if you require additional information. èl~r~lp;:~ A. J.jprown City ljanager AJB:ct Attachments I~:c: f 1'1/ f D ~ ?:~. \/ 2 t.... 1" n ~ 0 ~! ;_J. '. '.~ ...,: '''¡ .,.¡ , , .. ...,Iv CjTJ' r/l/\~\J,~~GER 817/281-6160 METRO 49ò-2700 1505 PRECINCT LINE ROAD 76053 e e e ". ~.A'.''.A~" :. f, ~l·~.,. _ ~'~ .~_.~~_~ . - - - -- - -'" ¡ ~ . ~t ,?;., ~ L lJ 2 8 1980 ~ . - trL' .. -"t-- *i ,.' - ... · -"iN .. .", _ '" I ..i... T ARRi\NT CO UNTY '..... ~ '. .... . .' '... FOlt1' WORTH, TEXAS 76102 A. LYN GREGORY COUNTY COMMISSIONER PRECINCT NO.3 February 27, 1980 p¡WJ it //8- 51 ~_.-------------------. Mr. A. J. Brown Hurst City Manager 1505 Precinct Line Rd. Ifurst, TX 76053 Dear A. J.: Enclosed are three (3) copies of the contract between Tarrant County, Hurst, and North Richland Hills pertaining to the Precinct Line Rd. project, which have been executed by the Commissioners' Court. Please have all three copies signed by Mayor Hampton and Mayor Faram and attested. Each city may retain one copy- the third should be returned to Mrs. Betty Hurley, Clerk of Commissioners' Court, at 100 W. Weatherford Street, Fort Worth, 76102. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you and look forward to working with you on other projects. Sin¡elY1 7J~!'~/ ~. Uyn Gregory County Commissioner Precinct 3 ALG : gm Enclosures/3 " ;' -)/~/: ,7 "; %~:- ,'/-' .:'" (, :-/ l\ / I I -, . , . e '.rIIE s rl'I',,'~IE OF TE YJ'.S ¥ ^ COUNtry OF 'fARl-lAN'l' l CONrl'l~l\C~r '1'11L~ l)¿i rti~,~ Lo tll is 09 re(~Jner) t élre frAR}{Al~T COlJt'J1"'Y, he re ina fte r ca lIed "Conn ty" ¡the CI'l'Y OF Ii URST, a home rule ci ty of 'l·arr~ant COLlnty I 'reXé:1S, rlcreirlafter (~alled uI1urst"; and the CI'ry Qt" NORTtlI RICIILAND HILI..S, a l10Ine rule city of Tarrant County, (r{~Xa5, he.reilìafter called tlN01-th Ric}11and llills". \~!-lEfŒAS I l-'reciJ)ct ltine f{oad is a boundaL~Y betweeJ1 lJU1-st and North Richlarld II ills, al1d tile ilnprovelnerlt ttlereof 1S 1_r1 t11e COITunon irltel-est of })otll cities as well as of the County ~n \AJhicl'l tl1ey are located; and, e WfIE}1EAS, the parties !ìereto desire to, obtain prelinLin- ary engin(~ering for arld to particiF)¿~te jointly toward tl)e cost thereof, so as to expeditiously undertake the acquisition of neces- sary right-of-v/ay and the' \....idening and improvement of Precinct Line Road between Grapevirle llig}1way and ~vatallga-Smit11field Road; NO\-~, TI1EREFORE, WI rl'ìJ E S~; l~ '1'11 For and ll) COllSiè.eration of the n1l1tual uJ1dcrtakiJì9s l1ereinafter set forth, t~le I)aJ_-ties Q,Ql'"ee as follo\vs: 1. llurst a~1r:,L:-,\í',?·-(': t.o c:c~rlt~a(...:t for ~)relinlil1ar\, en~Jlnt.."- erlng of I.)recinc::t Line Roa'c1 :),~t~y..·ec:~r.:. Ç~!-~üE~\I~n~~ lIi~J}1wa.y alae} \vatall\]d- Srnithfield l{()ad at a cost T\ot ~.~) E~XC,~{-~'(3 ~~2~4 400 as I)rOI)()sed by e 'l'e a 9 UE.~ I l~ a 11 ¿.in (1 l')e rk i 11 S , P 1- () Í :_~ S S i Lj 11 a j '~. Jì Y i J \t,~ l:~ 1 S I v.f}) i C lì pro t) ~') S d 1 is at tact1eLl he re to and maè·~.:': ~': ~.~ )-'::. t)~~ '(t':_~ :.- ~~',\/ ~....? ~e rL~r~ce. 2 . Nor t 1) }< iC.>).j, } ¿" r" ',.~ \J'~ !'. ~._ ~; , : '. -, f::' t. () I' e i Inl) II r s L~ } 1 tll- S t. trle s urn of $6 I 800.00 wl) i C)l !~(~::}:~-L _ :", ~_s (), ._, - t "~ i r(1 of th(~ c.:~J~; t ()t t hc~ 1) 1- 0 j t~ C t 5 e t f 0 .r t h 1 n 1. (j 1 ) () ve, ~' '" _~-: " : ~';~,) ~ . 0 ~_) e 1) did () n () r ÌJ e for e j J () v c I rJ) e r 1 I 1 9 U 0 . 3 . C~)lll)l)' dq' ~~¡.=; t r.. ~ .'- c~ i ~ !l',} u,~ ~. L: J I U l' S L $ 6 I DO 0 . 0 0 I \..'} '1 i \..... ~1 ~.~ ~.: ::: r L~ 1) r (~ s L~ ~1 l S 0 n (" -,-~.)) i r (i () f t ; ~ C' ç' (-~:~ t r t ~'t. ~ _ '. 1- 0 1 t :a (... l S elf t.) 1- t h i I ì 1 2 !) (, \.' (! . TILE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT T CONTRACT The parties to this agreement are TARRANT COUNTY , hereinafter called "County" ; the CITY OF HURST, a home rule city of Tarrant County, Texas , hereinafter called "Hurst" ; and the CITY OF NORTH RICIILAND HILLS , a home rule city of Tarrant County , Texas , hereinafter called "North Richland Hills" . WHEREAS, Precinct Line Road is a boundary between Hurst and North Richland Hills , and the improvement thereof is in the common interest of both cities as well as of the County in which they are located; and, WHEREAS , the parties hereto desire to obtain prelimin- ary engineering for and to participate jointly toward the cost thereof, so as to expeditiously undertake the acquisition of neces- sary right-of-way and the' widening and improvement of Precinct Line Road between Grapevine Highway and Watauga-Smithfield Road; NOW, THEREFORE, WI'1'NESSETH For and in consideration of the mutual undertakings hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows : 1 . Hurst agrees to cont-act for preliminary engine- ering of Precinct Line Road between Greoev_ne Highway and Watauga- Smithfield Road at a cost not ,o exceed 520 . 400 as proposed by - Teague , Nall and Perkins , Professional I:nginee,s , which proposal is attached hereto and made e - - r` ht -.- _ _ , : : ference . 2 . North Ri^_h] en : "_ ' ls _ _ a to reimburse Hurst the sum of $6 , 800 . 00 which rePe e , -: v _ - tl:i- rd of the cost of the project set forth in 1 . above , - - - sam _o be paid on or before November 1 , 1980 . 3 . County ay, ces te reinbu: :.c hoist $6 , 800 . 00 , whl c'1 represents one -third of the cr=! of , ,- >ro PecL set forth in ! . ahn''e . 4 . Such sums to be paid by North Richland Hills and County shall be paid within ten days of receipt of copies of bills from Hurst' s contractor for work completed, except that North Richland Hills ' payment need not be paid until, November 1 , 1980. This contract is made and entered into effective March 1 , 1980 , and shall, expire and be of no further force and effect on December 31 , 1981, or the completion of the improvements herein provided for, whichever shall occur first. • CITY OF HURST By: B . J. Hampton, Mayor ATTEST: Joan Proctor, City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By : Dick Faram, Mayor ATTEST: Jeannette Moore , City Secretary TARRANT COUNTY By : va - -- Mike Moncrief, Co ty Judge / j ' County Commiss . oner By : County Cummi ssioner By : on t C ssio r / By ` !__ _( / -' - Coun.-ty C�nmissroner • -. TIIC STATE OF TEXAS X ' COUNTY OF TARRANT X CONTRACT The parties to this agreement are TARRANT COUNTY , hereinafter called "County" ; the CITY OF HURST, a home rule city of Tarrant County, Texas , hereinafter called "Hurst" ; and the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , a home rule city of Tarrant County, Texas , hereinafter called "North Richland Hills" . WHEREAS , Precinct Line Road is a boundary between Hurst and North Richland Hills , and the improvement thereof is in the common interest of both cities as well as of the County in which _ they are located; and, WHEREAS , the parties hereto desire to obtain prelimin- ary engineering for and to participate jointly toward the cost thereof, so as to expeditiously undertake the acquisition of neces- sary right-of-way and the widening and improvement of Precinct Line Road between Grapevine Highway and Watauga-Smithfield Road; NOW, THEREFORE, WITNES SETH For and in consideration of the mutual undertakings hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows ; 1. Hurst agrees to contract for preliminary engine- ering of Precinct Line Road between Grapevine Highway and Watauga- Smithfield Road at a cost not to exceed $20 , 400 as proposed by Teague, Nall and Perkins , Professional Engineers , which proposal is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference . 2. North Richland Hills agrees to reimburse Hurst the sum of $6 , 800 . 00 which represents one-third of the cost of the project set forth in 1 . above , such sum to be paid on or before November 1 , 19U0 . 3. County nukes to reimburse Hurst $6 , 600 . 00 , whir l tum represents one -third of the chat of the uroloct set forth in 1 . abn“e . 4 . Such sums to be paid by North Richland Hills and County shall be paid within ten days of receipt of copies of bills from Hurst' s contractor for work completed, except that North Richland Hills ' payment need not be paid until November 1 , 1980_ This contract is made and entered into effective March 1 , 1980 , and shall. expire and be of no further force and effect on December 31 , 1981 , or the completion of the improvements herein provided for, whichever shall occur first. CITY OF HURST • By: B. J. Hampton, Mayor ATTEST: Joan Proctor, City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By ; Dick Faram, Mayor ATTEST: Jeannette Moore, City Secretary TARRANT COUNTY By ; Mike Moncrief, Co ty Judye • • County Conuniss , oner By ; .. County Commissioner By ` o*i t C ssi of r BY : A.<_____,__ County Cr/mmissioner Co..iRACT - PAGE TWO TILE STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY Of TARRANT X CONTRACT The parties to this agreement are TARRANT COUNTY, hereinafter called "County" ; the CITY OF HURST, a home rule city of Tarrant County , Texas , hereinafter called "Hurst" ; and the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , a home rule city of Tarrant County , Texas , hereinafter called "North Richland Hills" . WHEREAS , Precinct Line Road is a boundary between Hurst and North Richland Hills , and the improvement thereof is in the common interest of both cities as well as of the County in which they are located; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to obtain prelimin- ary engineering for and to participate jointly toward the cost thereof, so as to expeditiously undertake the acquisition of neces- sary right-of-way and the widening and improvement of Precinct Line Road between Grapevine Highway and Watauga-Smithfield Road; NOW, THEREFORE, Wi'TNESSETH For and in consideration of the mutual undertakings hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows : 1. Hurst agrees to contract for Preliminary engine- ering of Precinct Line Road between Grapevine Highway and Watauga- Smithfield Road at a cost not to exceed $20 , 400 as proposed by Teague , Nall and Perkins , Professional Engineers , which proposal is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference . 2. North Richland Hills agrees to reimburse Hurst the sum of $6 , 800 . 00 which represents one- third of the cost of the project set forth in 1 . above , such sum to be paid on or before November 1 , 1980 . 3. County .,,li COS to re i mbu, se Hurst $6 , 800 . 00 , which represents one -third of the cnst of tlic orolect set forth in 1 . ahnve . A . Such sums to be paid by North Richland Hills and County shall be paid within ten days of receipt of copies of bills from HurSt' s contractor for work completed, except that North Richland Hills ' payment need not be paid until, November 1 , 1980 . This contract is made and entered into effective March 1, 1980 , and shall. expire and be of no further forge and effect on December 31, 1981 , or the completion of the improvements herein provided for, whichever shall occur first. CITY OF HURST By : • B. J. Hampton, Mayor ATTEST: Joan Proctor, City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Dick Faram, Mayor ATTEST: Jeannette Moore, City Secretary TARRANT COUNTY By ;.— ✓: ear Mike Moncrief, Co ty Judge .�. County Commiss. oner • County Commissioner By . on t C ssio r BY •_ o nt : _-- ----- County Commissioner -' FAGL TWO þ"., ,) i/ . J .~ -IT::- ..~_ ), 'j / / ~. rT ,. /" I ( J_ l ) I , I .. . , , e'l'IlE $'l'1\.'1'[; OF TEY..!'.S COUNtry OF\ 'l'ARRANT y ^ x CON'l'RACT The parti~s to tllis agreclnent are rrARRA1'J1" COUt'JTY, hereinafter called "County"; the CITY OF HURST, a home rule city of 'I'arrant County, 'I'exas, hel.-einafter caller] ttllurstU; and the CI'ry OF NORTfl RICIILAND Ii ILLS , a home rule ci ty of Tarrant County, 'l'exas, hereinafter called tI!'-101-th Richland IJills". WHEREAS, Precinct Line Road 15 a boundary between liurst and tJorth Richland 11 ills, arid tile iH\f)rOVen1erlt t11ereof is il1 the conunon interest of l)Ot}l cities as \vell as of the County l.n which they are located; and, e WHEREAS, the parties !1ereto desil-e to, obtain prelirnilì- ary engineering for and to participate jointly toward the cost thereof, so as to expeditiously undertake the acquisition of neces- sary right-of-way and the/widening and improvement of Precinct Line Road between Graf)evirle lli<jhway and Watauga-Slniti1field Road; NOW, TIIEREF'ORE , WI flllJESSE1'11 For and 111 COI1sideration of tt1e rnutual undertakin9s hereinafter set forti1, t~1e parties agrE~e as follo\~s: 1. liurst a9r(~es to COI1tract for prelilniJìar\' en~llne- erlng of Precirlct Line ROétd bc'tweerl GrélI=)evine lli(J}lway and Watallga- Smithfield Road at a cost not to exceed $20,400 as proposed by e 'l'eague, Nall and Perkins, Professional En(Jineers, which proposal is attac}1ed !1Creto and n1ade a part t)(-~rf~of ì)y rl~ference. 2 . tJ 0 r t} 1 }~ i (~h 1 éi 11 d 11 ill S d (j r L' est 0 r è i n tl) II r s l~ If lll- S l t tl e S II n\ 0 f $ 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 'v-J }) i c}) r e 1) res e n t s () J ì (~ - t. t 1 i 1- ( i () f l } ) e (~()~; t 0 f t 1 \ t. ~ }Jrojec;t set for-th in 1. iJt){)V(~, StlC}ì SllIn to l>e l)did ()J) ()r before ¡~()vèJnber 1, 19UO. ) 3 . l: l) II n t )' d tJ l e t.~ s t () .! - ~ i It J ) U r ~ ~ C~ II U 1 'S t $ 6 I 8 0 0 . 0 0 I W 1 \ i \.... ~ ì ). ..J - f } ., t S~ l:~~ t_ for t}} i 1 '\ :;~=:~ rC~1)rcs{~~1ts onf~-~- 111-<'1 ()t th(~ ('{)st (). l}(" l)l-O-l(~C,' - ) ¿~ 1) () '.'0 .. '. ~, " .} ;'> OJ .,~ -rL::. . / ). /1' ~./ ~ ~ ' / (.'¡ <. -- l) I i I , .. . , . e 'I'IlI: ~T^,.rE OF TEY.!'.S COUN~lY Of TARRANT y ^ x COf\Jrr 11Ac"r 'fhe parties to this agree went are TARRANT COUNTY . . ° , hereinafter called "County"; the CI'l'Y OF HURST, a home rul.e city of 'l'arrant County, 'fexas, hereinafter called "Hurst"; and the CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, a home rul{~ city of Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called UN01-th Ric}11arld IIills". l.vHEREAS, Precinct Line Road 1S a boundary betvleen Hurst and North Richland Hills, and the improvement thereof is in the common interest of both cities as well as of the County in which e they are located; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to, obtain prelimin- ary engineering for and to participate jointly toward the cost thereof, so as to expeditiously under Lake the acquisition of neces- sary right-of-way and the/widening and improvement of Precinct Line Road between Grapevine Highway and Watauga-Smithfield Road; NOW, TIIEID~F'ORE , WI '!'ìJESSErrli For and in consid(~ration of the Inut\lal uJ1dertakings hereinafter set forth, t~e parties agree as follo\"5: 1. llurst a~lrees to contract for preliroil1ar\' en~line- er.lng of Precinct Lir~e Roa(i bctweerl GraF)eviJ1e lliCj}1way and \vatauga- Smithfield Road at a cost not to exceed $20,400 as proposed by e 'l'eague, NaIl and Perkins, Professional Entjineers, which proposal is attached hereto and madè a part he:r:eof by reference. 2 · l'J 0 r t}} Hie: fl 1 a I'} d if ill s a <J r L~ est 0 rei I nl) u r s l~ illl r s l the sun! of $6,800.00 wl)i(~)l r{~l)resents ()l~f~-thir(l of the cost of thL~ project set forth 111 1. ðhove, such sum to De paid on or before i~() Vl~ Inbe r 1, 19 U 0 . ") 3 · C l) lll1 t )' (J <J 1. e l~ s l 0 1- e i II J.) U I ~; ell U 1-.s t $ 6 8 0 0 .. 0 0, \tv ,) i (-" ~ ì 1.. a 1.) () '.' C .. ~ ~ ~:~ reI) res c ~ì t S 0 n (~ - ~ }) i ,- (1 C) f t. h c~ C' () s t () f l} }' P t) 1- 0 -i t ~ (~ t s elf 0 r t}) 1 n ~ To see Maps with Agenda: Please contact City Secretary's Office / Municipal Records