HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1980-09-08 Agendas0
Uity ®f orth Richland Hitis) Texas
August 26, 1980
PLEASE PUBLISH - August 29, 1980
PUBLIC HEARING
FOR 1980-81 BUDGET
There will be a Public Hearing on the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, budget September 8, 1980, at 7:30 p.m., at the City Hall,
7301 Northeast Loop 820. A copy of the budget will be on file
at the City Hall.
2anette Moore,ity Secretary
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. 0. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS 76118
t
CITY OF NORTH RI'CHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
: V he Meeting September 8, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. , in the City Hall , 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUS ER ITEM ACT ION WAKEN
PRE -COUNCIL
7:00 P.M.
1. Discussion on various Boards and
Commissions
COUNCIL
7:30 P.M.
1. Call to order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. ---Approval of Minutes of the Re ul ar
Meet i n au us t 25, 1980
5. -Proclamation - Proclaiming tlemo ri al
Sunday for Fire Fi hters +
October 5, 1980
6. Public Heari ng - 1980-81 Budget for
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
7. Public Hearing - Proposed ad valorem
tax increase
�.. 8. Consideration of Ordinance adopting
P 9
and a provi ng of the budget for . . . .
the City of North Richland Hills, --Texas
for f i sca 1 ear October 1, 1980
through September 30, 1981
9. Consideration of Ordinance providing
for levy and collection of ad valorem
tax on lst day of January 1981
10. i Consideration of Resolution pursuant
to Ordinance #676 exempting
$7,000-00 assessed value on homestead
property owned by people over 65
years of ace
CITY of NORTH RI*CNLAND MILLS .
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
t{the Meeting September 8, 1980 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUM ER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
11. Consideration of Ordinance approving
personnel classification chart for
19 80- 81
12. ___Ap 1 to cancel the September 22
re ul ar council meeting
13. Consideration of Ordinance approving
$25400.,000.00 Cit of North Richl and
Hi 11 s Texas, Water Works & Sewer
-System Revenue Bonds--.- Series 1980
4. Public Hearing On CDBG funding and
setting 2nd public hearing for
October 13, 1980
15. Adjournment
ic-
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE
CITY HALL, 7301
NORTHEST LOOP 820,
AUGUST 25, 1980
- 7:30 P.M.
1, Mayor Faram called the meeting to order August 25, 1980 CALL TO ORDER
at 7:30 p.m.
2. Present:
Dick Faram
Mayor
Jim Kenna
Jim Wood
J. C. Hubbard
Councilmen
Bob Brady
Wiley Thomas
Dave Freeman
Sharyl Groves
Staff:
Chuck Williams
City Manager
Jeanette Moore
City Secretary
Dennis Horvath
Director of Parks & Recreation
Ruth Pinner
Director Finance
Ann Cannon
Tax Assessor
Stan Gertz
Fire Chief
Mrs. Lynda Williams
Margie Nash
Member Planning & Zoning
Press:
P. J. Harbruck
North Richland Hills News
Joe Norton
The Tribune
Pam Harwick
Mid -Cities News
Absent:
Rex McEntire
City Attorney
3. Mr. Ray Williams,
Principal,Richland High
School, gave the INVOCATION
invocation.
4. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve the minutes of the August 11, 1980, meeting.
Motion carried 6-0; Councilman Brady abstaining due
to absence from the meeting.
5. Mayor Foram opened the Public Hearing and called for
anyone present wishing to speak in favor of this
request to please cone forward.
Mr. Tom Purvis, 6645 Calmount, appeared before the
Council.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR
MEETING, AUGUST 11,
1980
APPROVED
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 80-24, REQUEST OF
PURVIS & PURVIS, INC.
TO REZONE TRACT 16E,
ABSTRACT 1606, FROG
ITS PRESENT CLASS-
IFICATION OF 1F-7 TO
A PROPOSED CLASSIF-
ICATION OF t:ULTIPLE
FAMILY
August 25, 1980
Page 3
Mr. Purvis stated the land was platted to Harwood
and he felt certain it would be developed to the
south since it was already platted.
Councilman Thomas asked if Newman went through to
Harwood at the present time.
Mr. Purvis stated no, it was his feelings that he would
not undertake the developing of the property until
either Newman was underway south to Harwood or Emerald
Hills was underway to Highway 121.
Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Purvis if he owned the
property to the south.
Mr. Purvis stated no.
Councilman Freeman asked if there was a plat showing the
64 foot street.
Mr. Purvis stated yes.
Councilman Freeman asked Mr. Purvis if he knew of any
plans at this time to develop the property.
Mr. Purvis stated the owners had been attempting to develop
for about six months, but he could not say for sure when
it would develop.
Councilman Freeman stated that unless the property to the
south developed there would be no way out except Emerald
Hills Way at which there was already a traffic problem at
the intersection of Davis. Councilman Freeman asked
Mr. Purvis if he would agree it was conceivable that the
property to the south would not be developed and there
would be no outlet to the project.
Councilman Wood stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission
minutes stated the plan was to be a townhouse type. Councilman
Wood asked Mr. Purvis to explain the statement.
Mr. Purvis stated it would be a type of multiple family dwelling
that would be larger and a more conventional nature than you
might find in a neighborhood that would have younger families
with children. Mr. Purvis stated that with the research he
had done there seemed to be a need for a development
for middle age families or older families where the
children were grown. Mr. Purvis stated this was the
direction he would be looking at in the type of architecture.
August 25, 1980
Page 5
11. Mayor Faram advised the Council this was a Mayor's
CONFIRMATION OF
appointment with approval of the Council.
ANDREW WAYNE TO
PARKS & RECREATION
Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman,
COMMISSION
to confirm Andy Wayne's appointment to the Parks &
APPROVED
Recreation Commission.
--
Motion carried 7-0.
12. City Manager Williams made the following presentation:
PRESENTATION OF
PROPOSED BUDGET AND
"The following annual budget for the fiscal year of
SETTING PUBLIC
1980-81 is hereby submitted for your careful
HEARING ON THE 1980-
consideration and approval.
81 BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF NORTH
Certainly, the responsibility of drafting and administering
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXA!
this budget rests with the City Manager. This budget
incorporates the efforts of my administration personnel
of whom I express my deepest appreciation for their assistance.
The Charter does require an increase in salaries consistent
with the increase in the latest published national cost of
living index. That increase is now projected at 14.3"'.
This budget reflects an increase of salaries in the amount of
$618,000 which includes the addition of 13 employees whose
combined salaries total $188,713. An increase of non -departmental
expenditures include such items as insurance, social security
benefits, retirement, general liability, workmans compensation
and reserve contingencies. This is required as a result of the
increase in salaries.
Our supply requirements will increase by $147,178. Because of the
requirement to increase the salaries, it should be noted that some
supplies will be sacrificed. An example, the present tax rate was
set in 1973 and was based on gasoline at 12¢ a gallon. The price
in 1980 is $1.03 a gallon. Asphalt cost in 1975 was $5.00 a ton
and in 1980 is $20.00 a ton. The cost of asphalt may be increased
to $30.00 a ton by the end of the year. These are just two examples
of our increase in supply cost, it would be too lengthly to cover
all the increases such as office supplies, vehicle supplies, etc.
The capital expenditure is increased $54,000. Included in that
category is a $22,000 asphalt roller which is replacing a 1950
model and half of a computer which is $50,000. The other half of
the computer will be paid for by revenue sharing. The computer
is required for financial updating of records in accounting and
keeping records that we are unable to keep now. The computer will
enable us to furnish additional information on utility, taxation,
payroll, court, legal, police, and general ledger account. Thereby,
permitting us to furnish tax data information for previous years with
greater accuracy. The specifications for this computer were worked
up by an advisory committee which included citizens and professionals
with expertise in that area.
August 25, 1980
Page 7
13
14
15
It is hoped that this budget document adequately meets those
needs and demands of the citizens of North Richland Hills, as
can only be determined and implemented by their elected
representatives, the Mayor and Members of the City Council.
It is further hoped that through sound economic management,
policy guidance, and future planning North Richland Hills
will continue to improve its level of services."
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to set the public hearing for September 8, 1980, 7:30 p.m.
Motion carried 7-0.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna,
CONSIDERATION OF
to approve Ordinance No. 385.
ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 179 -
Motion carried 7-0.
ZONING ORDINANCE
(BOWLING ALLEYS &
SKATING RINKS)
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 835
Mayor Faram asked how many people were contacted
CONSIDERATION OF A
and how many responded in writing.
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE
FROM BRICK ORDINANCE
Mr. Horvath replied four letters were sent and
BY WILLIAM A. CUSHMAN
no one replied in writing.
DENIED
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman,
to deny the request of Mr. Cushman.
Motion carried 7-0.
Mr. Johnny Hopper, 304 Billy Drive, Hurst,
CONSIDERATION OF A
appeared before the Council.
REQUEST BY MR.
JOHNNY HOPPER,
Mr. Hopper stated he owned seven acres north of
PRECINCT LINE ROAD,
Precinct Line Road and would like to drill a
TO DRILL A WELL
well to water his trees.
APPROVED
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Hopper if he had agreed not
to exceed 200 feet.
Mr. Hopper replied yes.
i
Councilman Freeman stated that Mr. Hopper's letter
indicated he wanted to drill a well deeper and not
a new well.
1
Mr. Hopper stated there was an older well on the property
and he did not know if it would be of value to dig it
deeper or dig a new one. Mr. Hopper stated that in
either case he would not go beyond 200 feet.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve Mr. Hopper's request to drill a well not to
exceed 200 feet.
August 25, 1980
Page 9
h. Department of General Administrative Services
i. Department of Office Management
j. Department of Financial Planning/Research
Section 2:
The head of each Department shall be known as
Chief of such Department, shall be supervisory personnel and
shall be appointed and removed by the City Manager.
Section 3:
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after this date, to wit:
August 25, 1980
PASSED AND APPROVED this 25th day of August, 1980. i
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to
approve Ordinance No. 836.
Motion carried 7-0.
19. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of August 25, 1980. ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
DATE: �S
SUBJECT: Prorlamation for the September 8th agenda___.
DEPARTMENT: moire _
BACKGROUND:
Stan wants a proclamation proclaiming Memorial Sunday
fnr fire fiohtprs. Robert Hines will accept the proclamation.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO
ACCOUNT W BER:
August 25, 1980
Page 2
Mr., Purvis stated this tract of land contained approximately
18-1 acres and was located in the southeast section of the city.
The tract was about 1,200 feet north of Harwood, about 1,200_
feet from Highway 121 just west of the Junior College.
Mr. Purvis stated he had owned this property for about ten
years and had not made any use of it for a variety of reasons.
Some because of the water situation and others because of
access. Mr. Purvis stated he was asking for this zoning
change because he thought it would be in keeping with the
surrounding areas. The land to the east was multiple family,
to the south multiple family, the park was to the west, and
the school was to the north. Mr. Purvis stated the property
had a collector street, Emerald Hills. Newman Drive goes
through, the::property north ..and south and i t is a collector
street so he felt the development would not impound additional
traffic.
Mayor Faram stated Emerald Hills was not designated a
collector street. It was a fifty -foot street.
Mr. Barfield stated he had dedicated a right-of-way further
south and it was either a 64 or 65-foot width.
Mayor Faram asked if Newman existed at this time.
Mr. Purvis stated no, it existed to the north of the property
but not to the south.
Mayor Faram asked if Newman had been designated anything more
than a residential street.
Mr. Purvis stated that on the city plans he had looked at
over the years, Newman Drive looked to be something larger
than a neighborhood street. Mr. Purvis stated maybe collector
street was ' the wrong terminology.
Councilwoman -Groves -asked what street the traffic would use
to get out of the subdivision.
Mr. Purvis stated the traffic would basically go out Highway 121
or down Harwood. The Emerald Hills Way was to be opened up to
the east through the Folsom property that adjo-i ned on the east.
Councilwoman Groves asked when construction would begin.
Mr. Purvis stated construction would begin in six to nine
months.
Councilman Thomas asked what assurance the city had that the
other property owner would develop so the street could go
through.
August 25, 1980
Page 4
Mr. Purvis stated there was no question about the
delay until the street was opened. As to the
density there would be 121-2 to 14 units per acre.
Councilman Wood stated the map showed a portion of
this tract to be in a flood plain.
Mr. Purvis stated he did not intend to build in
the flood plain.
Councilman Wood asked Mr. Purvis if he would be
receptive to postponing action on this request
until the staff had an opportunity to review
this further.
Mr. Purvis stated he would not object to postponing
action.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition of this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
604, Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Brady,
to postpone action on PZ 80-24 for a staff review
and recommendation.
Motion carried 7-0.
7. No action was taken on items seven through ten. These
items will be placed on the September 8, 1980 agenda.
0
9
10.
Or
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 80-24
POSTPONED
PUBLIC HEARING - }
L HEARING,
�
PZ 80-255 REQUEST OF F
JOHN BARFIELD TO
i
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 2, ABSTRACT 1150
FROM AGRICULTURE TO
1 F-8-1400 ONE FAMILY
DWELLINGS
}
i
i
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 80-25
POSTPONED ;.
PUBLIC HEARING -
APPEAL HEARING.
PZ 80-26, REQUEST OF
i
JOHN BARFIELD TO
REZONE A PORTION OF
TRACT 2, ABSTRACT 1150
FROM AGRICULTURE TO
1
LOCAL RETAIL
POSTPONED
CONSIDERATION OF I
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 80-26
POSTPONED
August 25, 1980
Page 6
The franchise fee of $13,000 is our payment to the City of
Watauga for use of their streets and highways for water
services. There is an overall increase in the general
fund portion of this budget of $801,096,35. To meet the
requirement of this budget will require a 23/ tax increase
and that will generate $519,678 additional revenue plus
the $341.594 that will be generated because of increased
services provided for in this city. This includes franchise
taxes, sales taxes, fines and forfeitures, revenues and
investment charges for current services and revenues,
the sale of maps, administration fees, billing income and
registration fees, etc.
Other things are important to the city, however, priorities
are placed where services to the taxpayers will be rendered
without a greater tax increase. Some of the equipment in
the fire department needs replacing. We have 1952 model
fire trucks.
It is not a question of us trying to improve what we have right
now but rather just maintaining what we currently have. Our
present budget passed and approved for October 1, 1979 started
us with a surplus of $151,067 of uncommitted funds. Included
in this is $60,673.11 taxes receivable which are not a cash
item, leaving a balance of $90,394.61 to start the year. Some
of the unforeseeables that came about included a $67,000 overrun
on Davis Boulevard which originally projected at $460,000 cost
$527,000 and the $67,000 reflects that difference The fire
station that has been built on Davis Boulevard. It cost
$15,000 more than what we had budgeted, leaving a balance of
$893949610
These overruns make somewhat of a necessity to budget some surplus
because of some inflationary escalations that will arise with the
city at the present time. While a 23/ increase may appear to be
excessive, we feel it is necessary to face the reality that we
have fallen behind because of budget years between 1973-79 which
have been set on 1973 prices.
These are some of the items that were cancelled that were budgeted
for in 1979-80.
1. Animal Control Shelter - $303000
2. Marquee Sign for City Hall - $4,000
We had received approval from parks and wildlife division for $212,000
expended on Fossil Creek Park. Suggestion by our Engineer was that
it would cost $500,000. We do not have the balance of funds to go
ahead with this park.
August 25, 1980
Page 8
is
Motion carried 7-0.
16. City Manager Williams advised the Council the staff
had tried to contact Mr. Neisler and he was not
available. A message was left at his home advising
him he was on this agenda.
Mayor Faram asked if Mr. Neisler was aware of the
200 foot requirement.
City Manager Williams replied yes.
Councilman Kenna moved,'seconded by Councilman Wood,
to approve the request of Mr. Gary Neisler to drill
a well not to exceed 200 feet,
Motion carried 7-0.
17. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna
to ratify authorization for the City Engineer to proceed
with the engineering study for Rufe Snow Drive, payment
contingent upon bonds being sold.
Motion carried 7-0.
CONSIDERATION OF A
REQUEST BY MR.
GARY NEISLER, 6216
RIVIERA TO DRILL
A WELL
APPROVED
1
CONSIDERATION OF
RATIFICATION OF
AUTHORIZATION FOR
THE CITY ENGINEER
TO PROCEED WITH
ENGINEERING STUDY ON
RUFF SNOW DRIVE
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION FOR
PARTIAL PAYMENT TO
FREESE & NICHOLS IN
THE AMOUNT OF
$22738*06 FOR
GLENVIEW RIGHT-OF-WAY
MAPS
APPROVED
7
18a. Mayor Faram read the following oridinance: ORDINANCE NO. 836
APPROVED I
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
Section 1.: The following Departments are created:
a. Department of Police Central Services
f
b. Department of Police Criminal Investigation
i
c. Department of Police Uniform Patrol
i
d. Department of Police Administrative Services {
e. Department of Fire Operations
P p
f. Department of Fire Marshall
g. Department of Arson Prevention
18 Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to postpone action on this item indefinitely.
Motion carried 7-0.
August 25, 1980
Page 9
h. Department of General Administrative Services
• i. Department of Office Management
j. Department of Financial Planning/Research
Section 2•
The head of
each
Chief of such Department,shall be
supervisory personneltment shall be known andshall be appointed and removed by the City Manager.
Section 3:
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after this date, to wit:
August 25, 1980
PASSED AND APPROVED this 25th day of August, 1980.
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to
approve Ordinance No. 836.
Motion carried 7-0.
• 19. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of August 25, 1980. ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
DATE:
SUBJECT: Proclamation for the September 8th agenda
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND: ' Stan wants a proclamation proclaiming Memorial Sunday
for firs f'ghtr S. RObe t Ni M. s will accept the proclamation
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
0
C�
40
City of orth Richland Hills, Texas
...
IHEREAS, courageous and dedicated people in fire service
►rotected the lives and dreams of their neighbors from
�vages of fire since the beginning of civilization; and
IHEP,EAS, many of these brave people have suffered permanent
lity and many have made the ultimate expression of love
ei r neighbor by laying down their lives; and
'HEREAS, numerous churches of many denominations have
ted a desire to participate in a designated Memorial
to honor these consecrated men for - their ultimate
ices for their fellow men:
NOW, THEREFORE, I. Dick Faram, Mayor of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, do hereby proclaim October 5 , 1980 as
"MEMORIAL SUNDAY FOR FIRE FIGHTERS:
in the City of North Richland Hills and call upon our citizens
to pause and remember those Fire Fighters who have been killed
or disabled in the performance of their duty.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have
hereunto set my hand and caused
the Seal of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, to be
affixed this 8th day of September,
A. D., 19W,
M
tXk Faram, Mayor
4 �y
a7 a
v
0
.r
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND APPROVING A BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF NORTH R I C HLAND HILLS, TEXAS, FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR OCTOBER 1. 1980 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1981.
WHEREAS, an annual operating budget for the fiscal year October 1,
1980, through September 30, 1981, has been prepared by the City Manager
for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and
WHEREAS, said budget has been presented by the City Manager in
accordance with the City Charter, and
WHEREAS, pbbl i c notices of a public hearing upon this budget have
been duly and legally made as required by law, and
WHEREAS, after full and final consideration, the public heari nq has
y
been held on said budget, and it is the consensus of opinion that the budget,
as submitted and amended, should be approved, to wit:
RECOMMENDED AMENDED AND ADOPTED
BUDGET BUDGET
TOTAL REVENUE (General Fund) $499175307.19
• EXPENDITURES:
r�
L
nrn AnTKAI7WIT
City Council
22,786.00
City Manager
965510.00
Finance
3025520.70
City Secretary
41 ,784.00
Tax
81 ,258.80
Civil Service
15 5994.00
Legal
95000.00
Municipal Court
45,109.00
Inspection
90 s l 47.6O
Public Works
661 9090.20
Parks & Recreation
1142392.00
Municipal Bldg.
869796.40
Police
1 ,071 9459.79
Fire
828,053.88
Library
83,606.37
Non -Departmental
463,170.26
Sinking Fund
9039628.19
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 42917,307.19
$45917,307.19
1
.. R
1 40
0
RECOMMENDED AMENDED AND ADOPTED
BUDGET BUDGET
REVENUE - (Uti 1 i ty ) $3s4452800.00
TOTAL REVENUE 3 9445 9800.00
EXPENDITURES:
nFPARTMFNT
UL1 I I zy 3 9445 9800. 00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills
ratify, adopt and approve the budget as filed and amended for the fiscal year
beginning October 1, 1980, through September 30, 1981.
PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City Council at a regular
meeting in the Council Charmer of the North Richland Hills City Hall on the
day of September 1980.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY-:
City Attorney
F
ORDINANCE NO.
4 9 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION
OF AN AD
VALOREM TAX
ON PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS
OF THE CITY OF NORTH R ICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ON THE
' � 1ST DAY OF
JANUARY
1981, EXCEPT SUCH PROPERTY AS MAY BE EXEMPT FROM
TAXATION BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE STATUTES OF TH
TEXAS ESTAB ESTATE OF
ESTABLISHING A DELINQUENT DATE; AND SETTING THE RATE OF
PENALTY AND INTEREST AND PRESCRIBING ATTORNEYS' FEES
TO BE
COLLECTED
ON DELINQUENT TAXES; DECLARING A FIRST, PRIOR AND
SUPERIOR LIEN ON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY AS
1ST 19812 T OF JANUARY
0 SECURE PAYMENT; ORDAINING OTHER MATTERS RELATING
TO THE SU5JECT AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
go
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HI .
HILLS, TEXAS.
1. That there is hereby levied and shall be collect ' collected as provided
by law an ad valorem tax for the year 1981 on all ro
personal, property, .real
and
p , except such property as may be exempt from taxation
by the Constitution and the Statutes of the State of Texa
s, , situated
within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, 1 1 lls, on
January 980, and that the amount to be applied to the value of
such property shall be $ 1.25per $100-00 evaluation.
2. That the tax so levied and assessed shall be apportioned
fo11 owi n account to the
g s and funds in the amount set forth:
General Fund
41013.679.04
General Obligation Bond
Interest and Sinking Fund 903 628.19
Collections of the taxes levied ed shall 1 be deposited i ted to the '
. P credit � t of each of the
above accounts and funds i n their proportionate share of the e total levy and
after taking o consideration a 3/ uncol lectible factor which is to be accounted
for in the General Fund. ted
3. That the taxes provided for herein are in accordanc
e with the
appropriate State Statutes.
4. Ad Valorem Taxes levied by this Ordinance shall be due and payable
on October 1, 1980, and shall become delinquent on the first
day of
February, 1981. Payment of such tax is due in one -full installment.
5. If the tax is unpaid after February 1, 1981 such t '
delinquent and en � tax will become
penalty 1 ty and interest t will 1 attach and accrue as provided
by the Statutes of the State of Taxas p
including ud� ng Articles 1060a and 7336,
v.A.T.C.S.
3
6. In the event the taxes become delinquent and in the event such
delinquent taxes are referred to an attorney for collection, an
y
additional amoun
nt t of ten per cent (10%) of the total amount of tax,
penalty and interest then due shall be added as collection costs and
paid by the taxpayer.
7. Taxes herein levied and uncollected shall be a first prior,
r,
and superior lien against the property, and the said lien shall be
superior and prior to all other liens, charges and encumbrances, and
such lien shall attach to personal property with the same a
priority S
to real property.
8. The li-en provided herein shall be attached as of Januar 1 198 .
Y o
9. Should any section, provision or clause of this Ordinance be
declared by a court or competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same
shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance as a whole or an y
part thereof other than the art
p so declared to be invalid.
10. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of
its approval and adoption as provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills upon first and final reading at a regular meeting on the 8th day of
Septem er 1980. --
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
Mayor
4
0 RESOLUTION N0.
0
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the Cit
y of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that pursuant to Ordinance No
. 676, there shall be exempt
from City Ad Valorem Taxes for the year 19 -
y 80 1981 the sum of Seven Thousand
($7,000.00) Dollars from the assessed
value of any exclusively residence
homestead within the City occupied by an owner sixty-five
(65) years of age
or older, as of January 1, of such ear, provided •. y � p ed the terms and conditions
set forth in said Ordinance are full complied w' y p with,
PASSED AND RESOLVED THIS
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED .AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
day of September, 1980,
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Dick Faram, Mayor
ORDINANCE N0,
8E IT ORDAINED BY THE City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills Texas that:
The classification chart shown in Exhibit "A"
hereto and made part attached
p t hereof, the classification thereon are
i
hereby adopted for the City n com liance with Article p XVI I , Section
8 of the Charter,
tember,
PASSED AND -APPROVED this day of Se
p 1980, i
APPROVED:
Dick Fa ram , Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
0
39
0
ICITY MANAGER
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
FIRANCIAL PLANNING/
RESEARCH (Open)
u
U
0
0
i LLJ
Q
� Z
LL.
t CY_
LLI U-
� Z i
LLI
` U
H + H
4c
E
•r
F—
+,
s-
} d
H!
V
CL CL
i
• tr- O O
i
r Cl3XX
j
•r-- �-- Co Co
i
L10UdC1.
0
[ 0
t�
�o
W Z V
Co I I W W,
� � J
d o
>Z: Q U
�- W
F-- C) o
V X Gf3
c::c W
F-- V)
O
LO �
O CO
V
W
J
>- J
F- O
O U
d 1
W
Ck CO
N
W
V)
V?
Q
r--
W
U
•r
S-
Q)
N
•r
V
1
O
Z
0
0
'September 5, 1980
Memo P-008
ORaANIZATIONAL CHART
FOR
PERSONNEL/CIVIL SERVICE
0
Off
LU 1-1-9C
CD ct�
d I I Lu
J
� U
H
O
V U
r—
ce
>- W
E-- J
V
�
W ~
V
In 4x
V
O
U
�
O
r--
r--
•r
V
1
O
Z
}
[,o
CY_
W
CU
'Ci
Z
�t
Z
Z
d
.J
Cl-
\
Z
�-
O
F--
H
H
j
W
Cn
Z
H
r--
C]
L
O
Z S-
O O
N p
U
co
N -�C
co S-
Z oZS N
Z
Q .
J
CL r--
al CD CD r^�
N N N O
O 4-
-N O
r-- U
VO CD +-)
•r- 0- c
U cn CU
•r' E
4— H C )
4- U
.. O S-
Z T3 4-
►--� • r- CO W
CJ
W • r C -0 CU
0- Q3 O r-
V) CD
i
r--
le
E 'o
i
r]
lip
Alla
14,
=�
464
rA
V.
cn
co
1-0
ol
cli
Co
0
LQ
Ln
Lj
l J
0
0
U
�4
(i)
N
�
A
$4
ro
>1
u
a
I
s
H
4-)
ri
U2
fo
S4
1
H
H
4-j
Ll
�rf
U
< ^
N
>1 C4
S-4 M
tU ••
.H
1
N
n e—*,% eolo%
mco I'll*-
N N N
I*
U
� H H
W�
H H H
E-4
U
P p p
H
H
i4 P S4
a
:3: :3: :3:
4
�
Q
4J 4-J 4
H•H•ri•H
OT 00 il*--
N N N
v v v
H
H H
H H H
cu Q) a)
P4 0 0 0
w
O
H
T Z
� 112�
4J
41 C t
� � r
ui u)
+J a NCNN
cd �✓ v v
t
�H
M H
HHF-H
0
H • • •
=a�000
H
E-4 0 cd 0
• H C!] CJ] tl�
p
f f�rz
j W -0 0
&-4 P.4
3�cvr-+
Cy
U�
f
tY
Ile 1�4 1�4
A
I
<L'
o O o
� � �
W
W
4J 4
GN C*
i
N N N
i
i
r
H
H H
H H H
T
�
'
L
T
4-j 4J
4; 4 4J
i
z cl. 0 0
z z
i
i
1
1
t
e
s
CITY MANAGER
ti
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Arlington
36,492
64,164
2.
Carrollton
31,536
58,584
3.
Fort Worth
51,900
4.
University Park
(Also acts as City
36,708
49,668
Secretary)
5.
Grand Prairie
49,128
6.
Duncanvi a
37,200
48,000
7.
Mesquit
46,752
8.
Richar son
46,000
9.
Plano
44,004
10.
Irving
40,.521
11.
Garland
(,�"
40, 31+4-
12.
HURST
39,998 1
13.
Lancaster
,r340
14.
Euless
24,996
36,000
15.
Lewisville
33,000
16.
Bedford
32,600
17.
Grapevine
30,612
18.
White Settlement
25,292
19.
Haltom City
25,080
MEAN:
33,386
C42,ODOO
MEDIAN:
40,521
CITY SECRETARY
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
University Park (City Manager)
36,708
49,668
2.
Fort Worth
38,388
3.
Carrollton (30% City Sec.-70% Dir. of
18,720
34,776
Finance)
4.
Arlington
18,384
27,576
5.
Mesquite
17,460
24,852
6.
Garland
18,012
24,144
7.
Plano
18,540
23,088
8.
Lewisville (Asst. to City Manager &
23,000
Personnel Director)
9.
Benbrook
16,428
20,964
10.
Irving
20,784
11.
Grand Prairie (Director Personnel-Dir.
14,532
19,488
of Civil Service)
.12.
Grapevine
18,444
13,
Euless
17,820
14.
Haltom City (serves as Asst. City Manager)
17,479
15.
HURST
17,004
16.
Richardson
16,509
17.
Lancaster (Additional responsibilities
include
16,500
Hosp. Insurance, Social Security & Personnel)
18.
Duncanville (serves as Admin. Sec. to
12,180
15,480
City Manager's office)
19.
Bedford
15,000
20.
White Settlement
14,040
MEAN:
18,996
22,751
MIMIAN:
19,488
ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Arlington 30,120 50,184
2. Garland (Assistant City Manager) 32,376 43,380
3. Grand Prairie 41,616
4. Mesquite 26,976 38,844
5. Plano (Assistant City Manager) 35,004
6. Duncanville (Assistant City Manager) 28,200 34,800
7. Irving 27,456
8. Fort Worth '
25,980
9. Lewisville 23,000
10. Benbrook 17,148 21,888
11. Lancaster (Also acts as Public Works 21,000
Director)
12. Richardson 20,000
13, Bedford 20,000
1.4. White Settlement 18,040
15. Haltom City (Assistant City Manager)
16. HURST
16,484f
MEAN: 26,964 28,392
MEDIAN: 23,000
POLICE CHIEF
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Fort Worth
43,752
?
Arlington
25,836
40,824
3.
Carrollton
21,312
39,576
4.
University Park
(Chief of Police & Fire) 27,480
37,104
5.
Mesquite
24,600
:35,736
6.
Garland
26,616
35,688
7.
Duncanville
27,876
33,000
8.
Richardson
32,775
9.
Irving
32,040
10.
Grand Prairie
25,608
3.1,200
11
Plano
24,840
30,936
12.
Euless
25,656
13.
Bedford
25,000
14.
HURST
24,504
15,
Grapevine
17,436 22,260
16.
Lewisville
22,000
17.
Lancaster
21,470
18.
Benbrook
16,428 20,964
19.
Haltom City
1.9,605
20.
White Settlement
16,620
MEAN:
23,773 29,536
MEDIAN:
30.936
►
r
r
�c
FIRE CHIEF
s
�
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Fort Worth
43,752
2.
Arlington
25,836
40,824
3.
Carrollton
21,312
39,576
4.
Mesquite
24,600
35,736
5.
Duncanville
27,876
33,000
6.
Richardson
32,847
7.
Garland
24,144
32,376
8.,
Irving
32,016
9.
Grand Prairie
25,608
31,200
10.
Plano
24,840
30,936
11,
University Park (Fire Marshall &
21,252
28,692
Assistant to Chief of Fire/Police)
12.
HURST
24,504
13.
Lewisville (Chief Adm. to Officer of
22,000
Fire Dept.)
14.
Grapevine
16,920
21,600
15.
Lancaster
20,100
16.
Benbrook
13,476
17,208
17.
Haltom City
19,425
18.
Euless
14,928
White Settlement
Volunteer
MEAN:
22,586
28,928
MEDIAN:
30,936
PROJECT ENGINEER
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
University Park
(Dir. Public Works &
27,480
37,104
Civil Engineer)
_'.
`Mesquite (Civil
Engineer)
22,752
30,444
3.
Fort Worth (1V)
22,308
28,476
µ.
Richardson
27,840
5.
Duncanville
19,080
26,040
6.
grand Prairie
18,996
25,452
7.
Arlington (Civil
Engineer)
17,796
25,188
8.
Plano
19,464
24,240
9.
Euless
24,240
10.
HURST
^---`---�,---�
- 23,000
11.
Garland (Civil Engineer.)
16,344
21,876
MEAN:
20,734
26,718
MEDIAN:
25,452
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Carrollton
24,348
45,204
2.
Fort Worth
43,752
3.
Arlington
25,836
40,824
4.
Irving
38,340
5.
Grand Prairie
28,056
37,596
6.
University Park
(also Civil Engineer)
27,480
37,104
7.
Mesquite
24,600
35,736
8.
Garland
26,616
35,688
9.
Duncanville
28,020
34,440
10.
Richardson
33,522
11.
Plano
31,248
12.
HURST
------- -
---- -
- 28,548
13.
Euless
26,688
1.4.
Lewisville (also
City Engineer)
24,900
15.
Grapevine
18,312
23,364
16.
Bedford
21,951
17.
Lancaster (Asst.
to City Manager-
21,000
responsible for Public Works)
18.
Benbrook
16,428
20,964
19.
Haltom City (Dir.
of Utilities-
20,137
responsible for
Water Prod/Dist.
& Sewer Collection
& Treatment)
20.
White Settlement
1.5,080
MEAN:
24,411
30,803
MEDIAN:
31,248
STREET SUPERINTENDENT
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
I. Arlington (also Sanitation/Landtill� 21,840 34,512
2. Fort Worth 31,860
3. Garland 21,876 29,388
4. Carrollton 14,400 26,736
5. Mesquite 18,312 24,456
6. Grand Prairie 18,096 24,240
7. Plano 18,540 23,088
8. Irving 17,760 22,740
9. Richardson 22,368
10. Duncanville 17,160 20,280
11. HURST v 19,800
12. Lancaster 19,500
13. Grapevine 13,684 19,044
14. Euless 18,924
15. Haltom City 1-7,442
16. Lewisville 16,500
.17. Bedford 12,720 16,080
18. White Settlement 15,080
MEAN: 17 439 22,335
MEDIAN: - - '110, 280
I
WATER & SEWER SUPERINTENDENT
•
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Arlington (Asst. Director of Water)
21,840
34,512
2.
Richardson (Utilities Director)
31,000
3.
Carrollton
16,608
30,840
4.
Garland (Dir. of Water Utilities)
21,876
29,988
5.
Grand Prairie
21,480
28,800
6.
Fort Worth (Waste Water Treatment Supt.)
28,476
7.
Irving
21,120
27,012
8.
Mesquite
18,312
24,456
9.
Plano
18,540
23,088
10.
Duncanville
17,760
20,640
11.
Lancaster
20,600
12.
HURST
19,800
13.
Grapevine
14,952
19,044
14.
University Park (Utility Foreman)
13,092
17,652
15.
Haltom City (Asst. to Dir. Utilities)
16,826
16.
Lewisville
16,200
17.
Bedford
12,720
16,080
18.
White Settlement
15,080
19.
Euless
14,964
MEAN:
18,025
22,898
MEDIAN:
20,640
CODE ENFORCEMENT
OFFICER
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1. Richardson
31,700
2. Carrollton
14,400
26,736
3. Duncanville
19,080
26,040
4. Arlington
17,652
25,008
5. Irving
24 552
6. University Park
16,500
22,272 Of
7. Fort Worth (Inspection Supervisor)
16,212
20,688
}
8. HURST
19,260 �7
9. Grand Prairie
14,184
18,996
10. Plano
15,264
18,996
11. Garland
13,440
18,012
12. Euless
17,232
1.3. Lancaster
17,500
14. Grapevine
13,368
17,052
15. Bedford
15,600
16. White Settlement
15,080
17, Mesquite
11,292
13,838
18. Haltom City
13,400
MEAN:
15,139
20,102
MEDIAN:
18,996
*COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATOR
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1. Arlington (Dir. Housing & Mgmt. &
25,836
40,824
Inspections)
2. Fort Worth
21,504
27,444
3. Grand Prairie
20,460
27,432
4. Bedford
27,220
5. Irving
26,952
6. HURST
17,640
MEAN: 23,148 27,919
MEDIAN: 27,220
*In all cities employing a Community Development Coordinator: the
responsibilities and varied duties are much greater for the position,
than that of Hurst. The position usually requires a degree.
CIVIL ENGINEER
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1. University Park
21,252
28,692
2. Irving
17,760
22,740
3. Arlington
15,984
22,656
4. Fort Worth
16,740
2.1,360
5. Dallas
17,472
21,276
6. HURST
16,956
MEAN: 17,842
22,280
MEDIAN:
21,360
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Carrollton
16,608
30,840
2.
Euless (Asst.
to City Manager)
29,820
3.
Arlington
18,384
27,576
4.
Grand Prairie
(Also Community Dev.
20,460
27,432
Coordinator)
5.
Dallas
15,912
22,36d
6.
Irving
16,920
21,636
7.
Plano
16,020
19,944
8.
Garland
14,832
19,836
9.
Lewisville
18,900
10.
Benbrook
13,476
17,208
11.
Fort Worth
13,260
16,920
12.
White Settlement
15,080
MEAN:
16,219
22,297
MEDIAN:
19,944
ASSISTANT LIBRARY DIRECTOR
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
J.. Arlington
17,796
25,188
2. Carland
18,012
24,144
3. Trving
18,672
23,892
4. Carrollton
12,324
22,884
5. Haltom City
11,715
6. Bedford
8,700
11,040
7. White Settlement
8,869
MEAN: 15,101
18,247
MEDIAN:
22,884
LIBRARY DIRECTOR
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Fort Worth
40,344
2.
Mesquite
24,600
35,736
3.
Arlington
21,840
34,512
4.
Garland
21,876
29,388
5.
Irving
27,756
6.
Richardson
26,900
7.
Carrollton
14,400
26,736
8.
Plano
21,456
26,724
9.
Grand Prairie
14,892
19,944
10.
Duncanville
16,200
19,200
11.
HURST
18,504
12.
Grapevine _
13,200
16,848
13.
Haltom City
16,384
14.
Lewisville
16,200
15.
White Settlement
15,080
16.
Bedford
14,409
17.
Euless
14,028
18.
Lancaster
10,143
MEAN: 18,558
22,713
MEDIAN:
1.9, 200
PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Fort Worth
43,752
2.
Arlington
25,836
40,824
3.
Carrollton
21,312
39,576
4.
Mesquite
24,600
35,736
5.
Garland
26,616
35,688
6.
Richardson
32,847
7.
Plano
31,824
8.
Grand Prairie
23,688
31,752
9.
Irving
30,576
10.
HURST
24,492
11.
Grapevine
16,920
21,600
12.
Duncanville
16,800
20,400
13.
Euless
19,812
14.
Lewisville
19,500
15.
Benbrook (Community Services Director
16,428
19,2.17
handles Parks, Recreation,
Public Works/Streets)
16.
Lancaster
18,000
17,
Haltom City
17,647
18.
Bedford
12,360
1.5,600
19.
White Settlement
15,080
MEAN:
20,507
27,049
MEDIAN:
24,492
•
t
RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Arlington
19,764
31,260
2.
Carrollton
14,400
26,736
3.
Fort Worth
25,932
4.
Mesquite
18,312
24,456
5.
Richardson
23,832
6.
Irving
18,204
23,328
7.
Plano
18,540
23,088
8.
Grand Prairie
17,232
23,088
9.
Garland
14,832
19,836
10.
Lancaster
16,600
11.
HURST
16,200
12.
Grapevine
11,652
14,880
13.
Benbrook
11,268
14,376
14.
Duncanville
11,400
14,280
15.
Lewisville
11,748
13,596
16.
Euless
11,892
13,404
17.
Bedford
10,380
13,080
18.
Haltom City
12,547
19.
White Settlement
10,880
MEAN: 13,797
19,021
MEDIAN:
16,600
PURCHASING AGENT
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Irving (Purchasing,
Print Shop,
22,740
29,100
Warehouse)
2.
Plano (Purchasing &
Warehouse)
22,524
28,056
3.
Fort Worth
27,588
4.
Arlington
18,384
27,576
5.
Mesquite
19,212
25,680
6.
Richardson
17,040
21,840
7.
University Park
14,460
19,572
8.
Grand Prairie
14,532
19,488
9.
Garland
13,440
18,012
10.
HURST
17,196
11.
Lancaster
16,560
12.
White Settlement
15,080
13.
Lewisville
11,748
13,596
MEAN:
17,120
21,488
MEDIAN:
19,572
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Irving (Finance, DP, Purchasing
25,836
40,824
Customer Service)
2.
Garland
30,864
41,316
3.
Arlington
25,836
40,824
4.
Mesquite
26,976
38,844
5.
Fort Worth
38,388
6.
Grand Prairie (DP, Finance, Corp. Court,
28,056
37,596
Warehouse, Tax, Water Billing)
7.
Richardson (Acctg., Purchasing, DP)
34,900
8.
Carrollton (70% Finance, 30% City Sec)
18,720
34,776
9.
University Park
24,072
32,484
10.
Plano (Dir. Fiscal Services, Acctg.
31,824
Purchasing, DP, Utility Billing)
11.
HURST
}.26„496
12.
Euless
Z+ .
13.
Grapevine (Acctg. DP, Utility Billing)
18,312
23,364
14.
Bedford (Purchasing, Acctg, Payroll)
23,040
15.
Lewisville
21,000
16.
Lancaster
20,500
17.
Duncanville
15,480
20,040
18.
Haltom City
17,798
19.
Benbrook
13,476
17,208
20.
White Settlement
16,620
MEAN:
22,421
29,130
MEDIAN:
26,496
BUILDING & GARAGE SUPERINTENDENT
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Irving (Maintenance & Security of
25,728
32,904
all City facilities)
2.
Carrollton
14,400
26,736
3.
Mesquite
18,312
24,456
4.
Grand Prairie (Supt. vehicles &
17,232
23,088
equipment)
5.
University Park (Garage Foreman Only)
15,276
20,604
6.
Plano (Bldg. Maint. Only)
16,020
19,944
7.
Richardson (Bldg. Maint. Spt)
19,608
8.
Lancaster (Garage only)
19,300
9.
Euless (Garage only)
18,924
10.
Lewisville (Garage only)
16,800
11.
Duncanville (All rolling stock Maint.)
13,200
16,680
12.
Fort Worth
13,176
16,812
13.
Bedford (Program Development & Purchasing)
16,270
14.
Haltom City
15,974
15.
HURST
15,900
MEAN: 16,668 20,266
MEDIAN: 19,300
t
CASHIER
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
I.
Carrollton
8,880
13,068
2.
Farmers Branch
12,060
3.
Dallas
8,436
11,820
4.
Arlington
8,064
11,052
5.
Mesquite
8,400
10,716
6.
Fort Worth
8,124
10,368
7.
HURST
8,112
10.368
8.
Grand Prairie
7,716
10,332
9.
Grapevine
8,052
10,284
10.
Richardson
8,364
10,212
11.
Irving
7,872
10,068
12.
Garland
7,512
10,008
13.
Haltom City
8,652
9,912
14.
Benbrook
7,548
9,624
15.
White Settlement
8,251
9,104
16.
Bedford
7,140
91000
17.
Lewisville
7,656
8,736
18.
Forest Hill
7,188
MEAN: 8,049 10,218
MEDIAN: 10,248
COMMUNICATIONS CLERK
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Mesquite
2. Benbrook
3. Lewisville
4. Farmers Branch
5. HURST
9,720
8,820
9,612
8,520
13,044
11,268
11,112
11,100
10,884
6. Richardson
9,264
10,728
7. Irving
8,088
10,344
8. Grand Prairie
7,716
10,332
9. Duncanville
8,676
9,948
10. Euless
8,328
9,156
11. North Richland Hills
6,900
7,200
MEAN:
8,564
10,465
MEDIAN:
10,788
CLERK-TYPIST-1
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1. Farmers Branch
11,100
2. Dallas
7,872
10,_994
3. HURST
8,520�j
10,884^�
4. Carrollton
7,356
10;812"
5. University Park
8,988
10,596
6. Plano
8,904
10,584
7. Haltom City
9,084
10,524
8. Richland Hills
8,136
10,416
9, Arlington
7,812
10,416
10. Grand Prairie
7,716
10,332
11. Grapevine
8,052
10,284
12. Mesquite
8,016
10,212
13. Irving
7,872
10,068
14. Garland
7,512
10,008
15. Benbrook
7, 668
9,780
16. Richardson
7i992
9,732
17. Fort Worth
7,368
9,408
18. Euless
8,328
9,156
19. Lewisville
7, 908
9,120
20.White Settlement
8,251
9,104
21. Bedford
7,140
91000
22. Lancaster
6,828
8,460
23. Duncanville
8,412
`==»{ i 24. North Richland Hills
6,900
7,200
25. Forest Hill
6,984
MEAN:
7,919
9, 743
MEDIAN:
10,068
r
1 1
LIBRARY ASSISTANT
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
I. Dallas
11,400
16,068
2. Richardson
12,720
15,480
3. Fort Worth*
11,964
15,264
4. Euless
11,892
13,404
5. Carrollton
8,880
13,068
6. Arlington
8,064
11,052
7. HURST
8,520
10,884
8. Mesquite*
8,208
10,476
9. Grand Prairie
7,716
10,332
10. Grapevine
8,052
10,284
11. White Settlement
8,$69
10,263
12. Garland
7,512
10,008
13. Irving*
7,704
9,840
64. Haltom City
8,232
9,540
15. Lewisville
7,908
9,120
16. Bedford
7,140
91000
17. Duncanville
7,776
8,688
18. Plano
7,308
8,688
19. North Richland Hills
6,900
7,200
20, Lancaster
4,800
7,200
MEAN: 8,578 11,289
MEDIAN: 10,284
*Lowest level of several levels received
t
PBX RECEPTIONIST
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
CLERK-TYPIST-2
1. Farmers Branch
12,240
2. Garland
9,024
12,192
3. Carrollton
8,088
11,892
4. Grand Prairie
8,712
1.1,664
5. Grapevine
8,856
11,304
6. Mesquite
8,808
11,292
7. Benbrook
8,712
11,124
8. Arlington
8,064
11,052
9. Dallas
7,872
10,944
10. HURST
8,520
10,884
11. Richardson
8,820
10,728
12. Haltom City
9,084
10,524
13. Irving
8,088
10,3444
14. Plano
8,472
10,080
15. Highland Park
9,888
16. Fort Worth
7,680
9,804
17.`University Park
9,552
18. Euless
8,328
9,156
19. Lewisville
7,908
9,120
20. White Settlement
8,251
9,104
21. Bedford
7,140
91000
22. North Richland Hills
7,200
7,560
MEAN:
8,296
10,429
MEDIAN:
10,728
I.
2.
3.
4.
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
Farmers Branch
Garland
Arlington
HURST
WORKER
MINIMUM
9,024
8,400
8,952
MAXIMUM
12,240
12,192
11,532
11,436
5.
Grapevine
8,880
11,328
6.
Mesquite*
8,808
11,292
7.
Carrollton
9,612
11,208
8.
Irving
8,484
10,848
9.
Richardson
9,264
10,728
10.
Plano
8,904
10,584
11.
Grand Prairie
7,896
10,584
12.
Haltom City
9,084
10,524
13.
Lewisville
91108
10,428
14.
Euless
9,780
10,260
15.
Bedford
7,860
10.080
16.
Benbrook
7,668
9,780
17.
Fort Worth*
8,328
9,636
18.
Dallas
7,944
9,384
19.
Duncanville
8,412
9,228
20.
Lancaster
7,344
8,892
21.
North Richland Hills
8,100
8,520
22.
Forest Hill
7,692
MEAN:
8,593
10,382
MEDIAN:
10,584
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1. Garland
9,024
12,192
2. Carrollton*
8.088
11,892
3. Dallas
8,436
11,820
4. HURST
8,952
11,436
5. Grapevine
8,856
11,304
6. Arlington
8,064
11,052
7. Mesquite
8,400
10,716
8. Fort Worth*
7,728
9,864
9. Bedford
7,740
9,780
10. Lancaster
7,728
9,408
11. North Richland Hills
7,200
7,560
MEAN: 8,201 10,639
MEDIAN: 11,304
COMPUTER TERMINAL OPERATOR
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Irving
13,884
17,760
2.
Mesquite
12,432
16,620
3.
Garland
12,192
16,344
4.
Highland Park
15,288
5.
Richardson
11,256
14,376
6.
Dallas
9,768
13,788
7.
Carrollton
8,880
13,068
8.
Grand Prairie
9,600
12,864
9.
Farmers Branch*
12,600
10.
Arlington
8,952
12,264
11.
HURST
8,952
11,436
12.
University Park
11,232
13.
Lewisville
9,612
11,112
14.
Plano*
9,360
11,112
15.
Haltom City
9,540
11,040
16.
Bedford
8,220
10,380
17.
Fort Worth
7,920
10,104
18.
Duncanville
8,556
9,840
19.
White Settlement
8,445
9,296
20.
Forest Hill
7,332
MEAN:
9,786
12,393
MEDIAN:
11,436
* Computer Operator
WAREHOUSE CLERK
ACCOUNT CLERK
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
I. Farmers Branch
14,220
2. Plano
11,388
14,184
3. Carrollton
10,332
12,048
4. HURST -
9,396
12T ,012
5. University Park
12,000
6. Mesquite
9,240
11,856
7. Irving
9,144
11,688
8. Euless
10,380
11,184
9. Fort Worth *
7,752
9,888
10. White Settlement
7,155
7,867
MEAN: 9,348 11.695
MEDIAN: 12,000
ANIMAL
CONTROL OFFICER
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1. Arlington
11,508
15,756
2. Dallas
10,572
14,868
3. Grand Prairie
10,332
13,836
4. Garland
10,008
13,440
5. Mesquite
9,720
13,044
6. Richardson
10,212
13,020
7. Carrollton
11,124
12,972
8. HURST
9,876
12,624
9. Irving
9,840
12,588
10. Plano
10,332
12,252
11. Duncanville
10,464
12,240
12. Haltom City
10,524
12,180
13. Grapevine
9,300
11,868
14. University Park
10,992
11,592
15. Lancaster
9,936
11,352
16. Bedford
91000
11,340
17. Highland Park
11,292
18. Benbrook
8,712
11,112
19. Euless
9,864
10,800
20. Richland Hills
8,736
10,740
21. Lewisville
9,180
10,644
22. Fort Worth
9,180
10,632
23.Farmers Branch
10,620
24. White Settlement
8,869
10,263
25. North Richland Hills
81100
8,520
26. Forest Hill
6,912
MEAN: 9,451
11,789
MEDIAN:
11,868
1,
Grand Prairie
10,332
13,836
2.
Dallas
9,768
13,788
3.
HURST
9,876
12,624
4.
Arlington
8,952
12,264
5.
Plano
10,332
12,252
6.
Garland
9,024
12,192
7.
Farmers Branch
12,060
8.
Carrollton
8,088
11,892
9.
Mesquite
9,240
11,856
10.
Duncanville
11,760
11,
Haltom City
10,032
11,604
12.
Richardson
9,480
11,532
13.
Forth Wroth*
8,964
11,436
14.
Irving
8,688
11,124
15.
Richland Hills
9,120
11,064
16.
Grapevine
8,364
10,680
17.
Euless
9,372
91900
18.
Lancaster
7,728
9,408
19.
North Richland Hills
7,800
8,220
MEAN:
91009
11,552
MEDIAN:
11,760
DEPUTY COURT CLERK
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Irving
12,288
15,696
2.
Mesquite
11,568
15,468
3.
Fort Worth
11,988
15,300
4.
Dallas
10,572
14,868
5.
Richardson
14,496
6.
Garland
10,008
13,440
7.
Carrollton
8,880
13,068
8.
Farmers Branch
12,720
9.
Highland Park
12,708
10.
HURST
9,876
12,624
11.
Haltom City
10,524
12,180
12.
White Settlement
10,881
11,694
13.
Grand Prairie
8,712
11,664
14.
Bedford
91000
11,340
15.
University Park
11,232
16.
Duncanville
8,676
9,948
17.
Euless*
9,372
91900
18.
Lewisville
8,316
9,636
19.
Lancaster
7,872
9,564
20.
Forest Hill
8,184
21.
North Richland Hills
7,200
7,560
MEAN: 9,733
12,061
MEDIAN:
12.180
POLICE DISPATCHER
INVENTORY CLERK -REPRODUCTION
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1. Farmers Branch
20,280
2. Highland Park
16,716
1.
Dallas
9,048
12,732
3. Irving
11,688
14,940
2.
HURST _
9,876
12,624
4. Carrollton
9,828
14,4148
3.
Mesquite
9,480
12,144
5. Richardson
10,980
14,376
4.
Irving
8,688
11,124
6. Dallas
9,768
13,788
7. Duncanville
10,752
12,900
MEAN: 9,273
12,179
8. Plano
10,848
12,864
MEDIAN:
12,624
9. HURST
9,876
12,624
10. Forth Worth*
9,540
12,180
11. Euless
10,956
1.11899"
12. Mesquite*
9,240
11,856
13. Grand Prairie
8,712
11,662
14. Haltom City
10,032
11,604
15. University Park
10,800
11,400
16. Bedford
91000
11.,340
17. Grapevine
8,700
11,100
18. Lancaster
9,060
10,728
19. White Settlement
8,869
10,263
20. Richland Hills
8,052
91900
21. Benbrook
7,668
9,780
22. Lewisville
8,316
9,636
23. North Richland Hills
7,800
8,196
24. Forest Hill
7,200
MEAN: 9,547
12,153
MEDIAN:
SECRETARY
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Carrollton*
9,828
14,448
2.
Dallas
9,048
12,732
3.
Forth Worth
9,888
12,624
4.
HURST
12,624
5.
Arlington*
8,952
12,264
6.
Farmers Branch*
12,240
7.
Garland
9,024
12,192
8.
Grand Prairie
8,712
11,664
9.
Duncanville
9,600
11,436
10.
Plano
9,840
1.1,424
11.
Irving
8,928
11,412
12.
Mesquite *
8,808
11,292
13.
Haltom City
9,540
11,040
14.
Euless*
9,864
10,800
15.
Bedford
i,860
10,080
16.
Lewisville
8,316
9,636
17.
Highland Park
9,528
18.
Lancaster
7,236
8,616
19.
Forest Hill
7,848
20.
North Richland Hill
7.320
7,692
MEAN:
8,979
11,080
MEDIAN:
11,424
WATER PLANT
OPERATOR
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
I.
Grand Prairie
12,552
16,836
2.
Farmers Branch
16,260
3.
Arlington
11,508
15,756
4.
Dallas
10,572
14,868
5.
Forth Worth
11,940
13,824
6.
Carrollton
11,808
13,776
7.
Richardson
10,716
13,692
8.
Garland
10,008
13,440
9.
Duncanville
1.3,200
10.
Grapevine
10,320
13,176
11.
Irving
10,068
12,900
12.
Haltom City
1.1,040
12,780
13.
HURST
9,876
12,624
14.
Lewisville
10,584
12,252
15.
Plano
9,840
11,664
16.
North Richland Hills
8,100
8,496
MEAN:
10,617
13,472
MEDIAN:
13,200
ANIMAL CONTROL WARDEN
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Dallas
11,400
16,068
2. Richardson
12,396
15,828
3. Forth Worth
12.072
15,408
4. Mesquite
10,716
14,388
5. Farmers Branch
14,220
6. Plano
11,388
14,184
7. Duncanville
11,592
13,908
8. HURST
10,368
13,260
9. Lewisville
9,612
11,112
MEAN:
11,193
14,264
MEDTAN:
14,220
PARK 6 RECREATION
WORKER-LEADMAN
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
I.
Arlington
10.428
14,292
2.
Carrollton
11,808
13,776
3.
University Park
7.426
13,520
4.
HURST
10,368
13,260
5.
Grapevine
10,320
13,176
6.
Plano
10,848
12.864
7.
Lewisville
10,584
12,252
8.
Mesquite
9.480
12,144
9.
Irving
9,360
11,976
10.
Euless
11,304
11,892
11.
Benbrook
9,264
11,820
12.
Grand Prairie
8,712
11,664
13.
Bedford
9,240
11,640
14.
Dallas
9,708
11,592
15.
Duncanville
9,888
11,436
16.
Fort Worth
9,648
11,172
17.
Mesquite
8.208
10,476
18.
Lancaster
7,716
9,396
19.
White Settlement
81050
8,890
20.
Forest Hill
7,332
MEAN:
9,598
11,729
MEDIAN:
11,892
CHIEF METER
MER-INSTALLER
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
I.
Dallas
11,400
16,068
2.
Richardson
12,720
15,516
3.
Fort Worth
12,120
15;468
4.
Irv_4.ng
11,688
14,940
5.
Carrollton
11,808
13,776
6.
HURST
10,368
13,260
7.
Arlington
9,384
12,888
8.
Plano
10,848
12,864
9.
Mesquite
9,480
12,144
10.
Grand Prairie
8,712
11,664
11.
Farmers Branch*
11,640
12.
Lewisville
9,612
11,112
13.
Haltom City
9,540
11,040
14.
University Park
7,426
10,920
15.
Bedford
8,220
10,380
16.
Euless
9,780
10,260
17.
Lancaster
8,088
9,864
18.
Duncanville
7,416
9,072
19.
North Richland Hills
8,100
8,520
20.
Forest Hill
7,500
MEAN:
9,817
11,945
MEDIAN'
11,664
PRINTER
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Dallas
12,240
15,288
2. Garland
11,040
14,832
3. Arlington
10,428
14,292
4. Mesquite
10,212
13,716
5. HURST
10,368
13,260
6. Irving
10,344
13,212
7. Fort Worth *
10,140
11,736
8. Richardson
9,480
11,532
9. Fort Worth*
9,180
10,632
10. Plano
8,904
10,584
MEAN:
10,2.34
12,908
MEDIAN:
13,260
SENIOR LIBRARY ASSISTANT
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1.
Fort Worth
17,568
22,416
2.
Dallas
12,336
17,364
3.
Richardson
13,368
16,260
4.
HURST
10 368
13,260
5.
Garland
9,024
12,192
6.
Irving
9,360
11,976
7.
Highland Park
11,640
8.
Plano
9,360
11,112
9.
Richland Hills
9,120
10,416
10.
Bedford
7,860
10,080
11.
rlaltom City
8,652
10,032
12.
Lewisville
8,316
9,636
13.
Lancaster
6,780
8,244
MEAN: 10,176
12,739
MEDIAN:
11,976
STREET MAINTENANCE WORKER--LEADMAN
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1.
Arlington
10,428
14,292
2.
Carrollton
11,808
13,776
3.
University
7,426
13,520
4.
HURST
10,368
13,260
5.
Grapevine
10,320
13,176
6.
Richardson
10,464
13,020
7.
Plano
10,848
12,864
8.
Lewisville
10,584
12,252
9.
Irving
9,360
11,976
10.
Euless
11,304
11,892
11.
Benbrook
9,264
11,820
12.
Richland Hills
9,636
11,724
13.
Grand Prairie
8,712
11,664
14.
Bedford
9,240
11,640
15.
Dallas
9,708
11,592
16.
Duncanville
9,888
11,436
17.
Mesquite*
8,808
11,292
19.
Fort Worth
9,648
11,172
19.
Lancaster
7,716
9,396
20.
White Settlement
8,050
8,890
MEAN:
9,679
12,033
MEDIAN:
11,892
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
I.
Farmers Branch
14,100
2.
Grapevine
10,572
13,488
3.
Garland
10,008
13,440
4.
Mesquite*
9,972
13,368
5.
HURST
10,368
13,260
6.
Irving
10,344
13,212
7.
Grand Prairie
9,840
13,176
8.
Arlington
9,384
12,888
9.
Plano
10,848
12,864
10.
Carrollton
11, 124
12,336
11.
Benbrook
9,264
11,820
12.
Dallas
9,708
11,592
13.
North Richland Hills
10,800
;;,340
14.
Euless*
10,380
11,220
15.
Haltom City
9,540
11,040
16.
Bedford
8,700
11,040
17.
Duncanville
10,008
18.
Highland Park
9,797
19.
White Settlement
8,445
9,296
20.
Forest Hill
8,604
MEAN:
9,956
11,894
MEDIAN:
12,336
WATER &
SEWER MAINTENANCE WORKER-LEADMAN
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Arlington
10,428
14,292
2.
Carrollton
11,808
13,776
3.
University Park
7,426
13,520
4.
HURST
10,368
139260
5.
Irving
10,344
13,212
6.
Grapevine
10,32.0
13,176
7.
Farmers Branch
13,140
8.
Mesquite
13,140
9.
Richardson
10,464
13,020
10.
Plano
10,848
12,864
11.
Lewisville
10,584
12,252
12.
Haltom City
10,524
12,180
13.
Euless
10,380
11,892
14.
Richland Hills
9,636
11,724
15.
Grand Prairie
8,712
11,664
16.
Bedford
9,240
11,640
17.
Dallas
9,708
11,592
18.
Duncanville
9,888
11,436
19.
Fort Worth
9,648
11,172
20.
Lancaster
7,716
9,396
21.
White Settlement
8,050
8,890
MEAN:
9,791
17.,245
MEDIAN:
12,252
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
DRAFTING TECHNICIAN
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Dallas
14,796
20,808
2. Carrollton
11,916
17,520
3. Farmers Branch
17,340
4. Arlington
12,420
17,028
5. Plano
12,312
15,636
6. Grand Prairie
11,664
15,636
7. Garland
11,040
14,832
8. HURST
11,448
14,616
9. Mesquite*
10,716
14,388
10. Mesquite*
10,212
13,716
11. Fort Worth
10,380
13,248
12. Irving
10,344
13,212
13. Richardson
10,428
12,648
14. Richland Hills
11,364
12,504
15. Grapevine
9,804
12,504
16. Bedford
9,540
12,000
17. White Settlement
10,881
11,694
18. Forest Hill
7,332
9,156
MEAN:
10,976
14,360
MEDIAN:
14,388
IDENTIFICATION TECHNICIAN
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. University Park
19,620
2. Richardson
18,744
3. HURST
11 448
14,616
4. Plano*
11,388
14,184
5. Fort Worth*
9,852
12,576
6. Farmers Branch
11,460
MEAN:
10,896
15,200
MEDIAN:
14,616
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Irving
12,900
16,488
2. Garland
12,192
16,344
3. Plano
12,552
15,636
4. Grand Prairie
11,664
15,636
5. Dallas
12,864
15,612
6. Mesquite*
11,292
15,096
7. HURST
11,448
14,616
8. Arlington
10,428
14,292
9. Farmers Branch
14,280
10. Richardson
10,464
12,744
MEAN:
11,756
15,074
MEDIAN:
15,612
RECREATION SPECIALIST
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Carrollton
11,220
20,844
2. Garland
14,832
19,836
3. Mesquite
13,716
18,312
4. Arlington
12,960
17,772
5. Plano
13,848
17,232
6. Irving
12,588
16,092
7. Grand Prairie
11,952
16,032
8. Richardson
12,132
14,748
9. HURST
11,448
14,616
10. Duncanville
14,304
11. Irving
10,848
14,004
12. Lewisville
11,520
13,344
13. Farmers Branch
12,900
14. Dallas
9,048
12,732
15. Lancaster
10,368
12,588
16. Haltom City
9,044
12,547
17. White Settlement
10,881
11,694
18. Euless
9,864
10,800
19. Bedford
8,460
10,680
MEAN:
11,455
14,794
MEDIAN:
14,304
EQUIPMENT MECHANIC
EQUIPMENT MECHANIC (CONTINUED)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Garland
Mesquite
Arlington *
Fort Worth*
Richardson*
HURST
MINIMUM
130440
13,044
11,508
13,536
13,368
12,024
MAXIMUM
18,012
17,436
15,756
15,672
15,516
15,336
7.
Irving
11,976
15,324
8.
Lancaster
12,444
15,120
9.
Benbrook
11,268
14,376
10.
Farmers Branch*
14,220
11.
Grand Prairie
10,584
14,184
12.
Carrollton*
12,144
14,160
13.
Dallas*
11,112
13,896
14.
Plano
11,388
13,824
15.
Highland Pakr*
13,728
16.
University Park
13,520
17.
Grapevine *
10,572
13,488
18.
Haltom City
11,604
13,428
19.
Bedford*
10,080
12,720
20.
Euless
12,348
21.
Lewisville
10,584
12,252
22.
Highland Park*
11,648
23.
Duncanville
9,888
11,232
24.Forest Hill
10,440
CODE INSPECTOR
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Carrollton
12,324
22,884
2.
Richardson
16,224
20,748
3.
Dallas
14,388
20,244
4.
Farmers Branch*
19,860
5.
Plano*
15,264
18,996
6.
Grand Prairie
14,184
18,996
7.
Arlington
13,764
18,876
8.
Mesquite*
13,716
18,312
9.
Irving *
14,232
18,204
10.
Garland
13,440
18,012
11.
Fort Worth
14,724
17,040
12.
HURST
13,260
16,908
13.
Grapevine
12,972
16,728
14.
Lancaster
13,800
16,200
15.
Highland Pakr
16,008
16.
Duncanville
12,240
14,520
17.
Bedford*
11,040
13,920
18.
University Park
13,116
19.
Haltom City
11,040
12,780
20.
Euless
12,348
21.
North Richland Hills
10,800
11,400
22.
White Settlement
8,935
10,005
MEAN:
13,130
16,641
MEDIAN:
17,040
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
25. North Richland Hills 9,600 10,080
26. White Settlement 8,935 10,005
MEAN: 11,455 13,759
MEDIAN: 13,896
GARAGE FOREMAN
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Carrollton
11,324
22,884
2.
Arlington
14,964
21,216
3.
Mesquite
15,096
20,160
4.
Dallas
13,764
19,368
5.
Garland
13,440
18,012
6.
University Park
17,976
7.
Richardson
14,772
17,892
8.
HURST
13 260
16,908
9.
Plano
13,188
16,416
10.
Irving
12,588
16,092
11.
Haltom City
15,974
12.
Bedford
11,340
14,280
13.
Highland Park
13,056
14.
Duncanville
12,000
MEAN:
13,474
17,302
MEDIAN:
17,892
HORTICULTURIST
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1. Dallas
17,100
24,060
2. Fort Worth*
16,140
20,604
3. Richardson
15,072
17,484
4. HURST
13,260
16,908
MEAN: 15,393 19,764
MEDIAN: 20,604
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Carrollton
12,324
22,884
2.
Richardson
16,224
20,748
3.
Dallas
14,388
20,244
4.
Grand Prairie
14,184
18,996
5.
Arlington
13,764
18,876
6.
Irving*
14,232
18,204
7.
Plano
14,532
18,096
8.
Garland
13,440
18,012
9.
Fort Worth
14,724
17,040
10.
HURST
13,260
16,908
11.
Grapevine
12,972
16,728
12.
Haltom City
13,428
15,540
13.
Benbrook
12,096
15,432
14.
Duncanville
12,240
14,520
15.
Bedford*
11,040
13,920
16.
Lewisville*
11,520
13,344
17.
Euless*
12,348
18.
North Richland Hills
10,800
11,400
MEAN: 13,245
16,847
MEDIAN:
17,040
PARK & RECREATION FOREMAN
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Dallas
Garland
Irving
Arlington
Grand Prairie
HURST
MINIMUM
13,764
13,440
13,548
12,612
12,864
13,260
MAXIMUM
19,368
18,012
17,340
17,292
17,232
16,908
7.
Mesquite
12,432
16,620
8.
Plano
13,188
16,416
9.
Farmers Branch *
16,200
10.
Benbrook
11,268
14,376
11.
Bedford
11,340
14,280
12.
Grapevine
11,100
14,172
13.
Lewisville
12,036
13,920
14.
Haltom City
13,888
15.
Euless
13,884
16.
Highland Park
13,056
17.
Lancaster
10,560
12,804
18.
Duncanville
12,000
19.
North Richland Hills
12,000
20.
University Park
10,171
MEAN:
12,416
14,997
MEDIAN:
14,376
STREET FOREMAN
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
I. Farmers Branch*
21,540
2. Dallas
13,764
19,368
3. Garland
13,440
18,012
4. Irving
13,458
17,340
5. Arlington
12,612
17,292
6. Grand Prairie
12,864
17,232
7. HURST
13,260
16,908
8. Mesquite
12,432
16,620
9. Plano
13,188
16,416
10. Benbrook
11,268
14,376
11. Bedford
11,340
14,280
12. Grapevine
11,100
14,172
13. Lewisville
12,036
13,920
14. Haltom City
13,888
15. Euless
13,884
16. University Park
13,416
17. Highland Park
13,056
18. Lancaster
10,560
12,804
19. North Richland Hills
12,000
12,600
20. Richland Hills
11,340
12,372
21. Duncanville
12,000
MEAN: 12,311
15,309
MEDIAN:
14,376
WATER4_SEWER
I. Dallas
2. Grand Prairie
3. Garland
4. Irving
5. Arlington
6. HURST
MINIMUM
13,764
14,184
13,440
13,548
12,612
13,260
MRX, IMUM
19068
18,996
18,012
17,340
17,292
16,908
7. Mesquite
12,432
16,620
8. Plano
13,188
16,416
9. Farmers Branch
16,260
10. Bedford
11,340
14,280
11. Lewisville
12,036
13,920
12. Haltom City
13,888
13. Euless
13,884
14. Richardson
10,716
13,692
15. North Richland Hills
129600
13,500
16. University Parki
13,416
17. Highland Park
13,056
18. Lancaster
10,560
12,804
19. Richland Hills
11,340
12,372
20. Duncanville
12,000
MEAN:
12,501
15 ,201
MEDIAN:
14,280
CHIEF ABM
CLERK
MINIMUM
MAXIMM
1. Grand Prairie
21,480
28s800
2. Farmers Branch(Masters Degree)
24*%0
3. Carrollton
12,324
22,884
4. HURST
13,260
16,908
5, Dallas
11,400
15,068
6. Duncanville
15,816
7. Garland
11,040
14,832
8. Mesquite
10,992
14,748
9. Irving
11,412
14,592
10. Lewisville
12,336
14,280
11.Richardson
10,980
14,040
12. Arlington
10,164
13,932
13. Fort Worth
10,380
13,248
14. Plano
10,848
12,864
15. Euless
11,628
12,156
16. White Settlement
10,881
11,694
17. Bedford
91000
11,340
18. Forest Hill
10,608
MEAN:
11,875
15,764
MEDIAN:
14,692
WATER SvsTEMS FoN
MIN!
MAXIMUM
1. Dallas
13,764
19,368
2. Grand Prairie
14,184
18,996
3. Garland
13,440
18,012
4. Irving
13,548
17,340
5. Arlington
12,612
17,292
6. HURST
13,260
16,908
7. Plano
13,188
16,416
8. Bedford
11,340
14,280
9. Lewisville
12,036
13,920
10. Haltom City
13,888
11. Euless
13,884
12. Richardson
10,716
13,692
13. Highland Park
13,056
14. Lancaster
10,560
12,804
15. Duncanville
12,000
16. Fort Worth
10,140
11,736
17. Forest Hill
10,860
MEAN: 12,399
14,968
MEDIAN:
13,920
TRAFFIC CONTROL
I. Carrollton
2. Irving
3. Arlington
4. HURST
TECHNICIA,ANN
MINIMUM
11,220
14,940
13,764
13,260
MAXIMUM
20,844
19,128
18,876
16,908
S. Grand Prairie
12,552
16,836
6. Mesquite
12,432
16,620
7. Richardson
13,044
15,828
8. Haltom City
12,180
14,100
9. Farmers Branch
13,500
10. Plano
10,848
12,864
11. Dallas
9,048
12,732
12. Highland Park
126251
13. Garland
9,024
12,192
14. Duncanville
12,000
MEAN:
12,028
15,334
MEDIAN:
15,828
WATER OFFICE MANAGER
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
TRAFFIC CONTROL COORDINATOR
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Arlington
19,764
31,260
2. Farmers Branch
30,900
3. Irving
19,128
24,468
4. Richardson
23,676
5. Mesquite
15,840
21,156
6. Plano
16,812
20,940
7. Grand Prairie
15,636
20,940
8. Dallas
14,796
20,808
9. HURST T
13,260
16,908
10. University Park
15,408
11. Garland
10,008
13,440
12. Lewisville
11,520
13,344
13. Highland Park
12,144
14. Duncanville
12,000
15. Forest Hill
11,892
16. Grapevine
8,856
11,304
17. Euless
9,864
10,800
MEAN:
14,135
18,317
MEDIAN:
16,908
COMPUTER PROGRAMMER
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Irving*
17,760
22,740
2. Garland
16,344
21,876
3. Irving*
16,920
21,636
4. Farmers Branch
21,300
5. Mesquite
15,468
20,664
6. Grand Prairie
15,264
20,460
7. Richardson
15,840
20,220
8. HURST
14,616
18,636
9. Dallas
12,336
17,364
10. Arlington
12,612
17,292
11. Grapevine
11,700
14,940
12. White Settelement
10,881
11,694
13. Bedford
91000
11,340
MEAN:
14,062
18,474
MEDIAN:
20,220
1. Richardson
26,808
2. Irving
18,672
23,892
3. Arlington
15,984
22,656
4. Farmers Branch
21,300
5. University Park
21,192
6. HURST
13,920
17,748
7. Grand Prairie
12,864
17,232
8. Mesquite
11,856
15,840
9. Plano
11,952
14,892
10. Garland
10,008
13,440
MEAN:
13,449
19,306
MEDIAN:
17,748
POLICE RECRUIT
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Carrollton
13,788
16,920
2. Dallas
15,996
3. Duncanville
13,224
15,756
4. Highland Park
15,084
5. Richardson
14,328
6. Bedford
11,040
13,920
7. HURST
13,740
8. Garland
12,912
9. Plano
12,000
10. North Richland Hills
10,800
11,340
11. Fort Worth
10,116
MEAN:
12,21-3
13,828
MEDIAN:
13,920
�► FIRE RECRUIT
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Carrollton
13,224
16,236
2. Dallas
15,996
3. Duncanville
13,224
15,756
4. Richardson
14,400
5. HURST
13,740
6. North Richland Hills
10,560
11,100
7. Fort Worth
10,116
MEAN:
12,336
13,906
MEDIAN:
14,400
FIREFIGHTER
MIN
___. M
MAXIMUM
1.
Dallas
16,560
18,372
2.
Farmers Branch
18,180
3.
Mesquite
14,748
17,040
4.
Grand Prairie
13,128
16,740
5.
Richardson
14,400
16,656
6.
Irving
13,932
16,116
7.
Fort Worth
14,076
15,516
8.
HURST
132740
15,108
9.
University Park
12,588
14,772
10.
Haltom City
11,040
14,100
11.
Grapevine
12,120
14,088
12.
Garland
14,088
13.
Bedford
10,680
13,500
14.
Euless
11,892
13,404
15.
Richland Hills
11,028
13,116
16.
Lewisville
11,292
13,068
17.
Arlington
11,580
12,804
18.
Lancaster
12,216
12,612
19.
Plano
12,204
20.
North Richland Hills
10,800
11,340
21.
Benbrook
8,820
11,268
22.
Forest Hill
9,600
10,200
MEAN:
12,328
14,286
MEDIAN:
14,088
PATROLMAN I
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1. Dallas
16,560
18,372
2. Farmers Branch
18,180
3. Irving
13,932
17,772
4. Richardson
15,084
17,532
5. Grand Prairie
13,740
17,532
6. Mesquite
14,748
17,040
7. Highland Park
16,716
8. Plano
13,800
16,320
9. Fort Worth
14,076
15,516
10. HURST
13,740
_ 15,108
11. Haltom City
11,604
14,796
12. University Park
12,588
14,772
13. Lewisville
12,228
14,136
14. Grapevine
12,120
14,088
15. Lancaster
12,204
14,040
16. Garland
14,040
17. Bedford
11,340
13,920
18. Benbrook
10,560
13,476
19. Arlington
12,192
13,428
20. Euless
11,892
13,404
21. Richland Hills
11,028
13,116
22. White Settlement
12,126
13,042
23. North Richland Hills
11,100
11,652
MEAN: 12,833
15,130
MEDIAN:
14,772
PATROLMAN 2
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
I. Highland Park
17,976
2. Grand Prairie
13,740
17,532
3. HURST T
15,636
4. University Park
13,284
15,600
5. Lewisville
15,288
6. North Richland Hills
11,400
12,000
7. Forest Hill*
101008
MEAN:
12,808
14,863
MEDIAN:
15,600
*Fort Worth training officer
Other cities may use Detective or Cpl.
FIRE LI_EUTENANT
FIRE DRIVER ENGINEER
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Dallas
19,452
2. Richardson
19,356
3. Farmers Branch
18,540
4. Mesquite
17,892
5. Garland
17,856
6. Arlington
14,448
17,580
7. Grand Prairie
13,740
17,532
8. Carrollton*
17,508
9, Fort Worth
17,352
10. Irving
14,640
16,944
11. Highland Park
16,740
12. Plano
15,024
16,656
13. University Park *
13,284
16,248
14. HURST _
152636
15.Lewisville
14,436
16. Euless
14,028
17. Lancaster*
13,404
13,812
MEAN:
14,090
16,916
MEDIAN:
17,352
POLIE SERGEANT
MINIMUM
MAXjMUM
I.
Dallas
21,216
2.
Richardson
20,928
3.
Grand Prairie
18,780
20,700
4.
Farmers Branch
20,280
5.
Garland
20,208
6.
Mesquite
18,312
20,160
7.
Carrollton
19,944
8.
Arlington
17,148
19,848
9.
Irving
16,140
19,632
10.
Fort Worth
19,632
11.
Highland Park
19,260
12.
Plano
18,000
19,200
13.
University Park
15,732
18,552
14.
HURST , _
17,196
15.
Duncanville
17,976
16.
Lewisville
16,488
17.
Haltom City
15,540
16,320
18.
Lancaster
15,168
15,924
19.
Grapevine
14,736
15,624
20.
Bedford
13,920
15,600
21.
Euless
15,444
22.
Benbrook
11,832
15,096
23.
Richland Hills
12,396
13,668
24.
North Richland Hills
12,000
12,600
25.
Forest Hill
11,892
MEAN: 15,362
17,736
MEDIAN:
18,552
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
I.
Dallas
21,216
2.
Richardson
21,l44
3.
Farmers Branch
20,280
4.
Grand Prairie
17,940
19,788
5.
Mesquite
19,692
6.
Garland
19,644
7.
Fort Worth
19,632
8.
Carrollton
19,272
9.
Arlington
16,332
18,900
10.
Irving
16,140
18,684
11.
Highland Park
18 384-
12.
Duncanville
17,976
13.
HURST _ _«
11,196
14.
Plano
17,280
15.
University Park
14,460
17,016
16.
Grapevine
14,736
15,624
17.
Lancaster
14,952
15,612
18.
Haltom City
14,796
15,540
19.
Euless
15,444
20.
North Richland Hills
12,000
12,600
21.
Forest Hill
11,424
.
MEAN:
15,170
17,737'
MEDIAN:
18,384
FIRE CAPTAIN
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
1.
Duncanville*
23,484
2.
Grand Prairie
21,156
23,328
3.
Dallas
23,280
4.
Richardson
23,112
5.
Farmers Branch
22,920
6.
Mesquite
21,672
7.
Fort Worth
21,564
8.
Garland
21,480
9.
Arlington
18,000
20,844
10.
Carrollton
20,676
11.
Irving
17,844
20,640
12.
Highland Park
20,088
13.
HURST
_ _
19,080
14.
University Park
15,660
18,420
15.
Plano
18,300
16.
Euless
17,232
17.
Lancaster
16,056
16,380
18.
Lewisville
15,756
MEAN:
17,743
20,459
MEDIAN:
20,844
El
POLICE CAPTAIN
MIN I14JM MAXI MUM
1. Grand Prairie
24,960
27,516
2. Richardson
25,968
i Dallas
25,392
4. University Park
21,252
25,044
5. Fort Worth
24,816
6. Irving
20,172
24,516
7. Mesquite
23,304
24,456
8. Arlington
21,888
24,132
9. Plano
22,200
23,400
10. Garland
22,548
11. Grapevine
18,216
19,128
12. HURST
19,080
13. Lewisville
18,468
14. Lancaster
17,448
18,324
15. White Settlement
15,080
15,834
MEAN:
20,502
22,575
`-MEDIAN:
24,132
POLICE M%NR*
MINIMUM - MAXIMUM
1. Fort Worth
29,784
2. Farmers Branch
29,460
3. Mesquite 26,304
27,612
4. Irving 21,732
26,412
5. Garland
259392
6. HURST
19,080
MEAN: 24,018
26,290
MEDIAN:
279612
* The cities that responded to this had positions for Assistant Chief•
or Deputy Chief only.
POLICE CAPTAIN
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1. Grand Prairie
24,960
27,516
2. Richardson
25,968
3. Dallas
25,392
4. University Park
21,252
25,044
5. Fort Worth
24,816
6. Irving
209172
24,516
7. Mesquite
23,304
24,456
8. Arlington
21,888
24,132
9. Plano
22,200
23,400
10. Garland
22,548
11. Grapevine
18,216
19,128
12. HURST
19,080 "
13. Lewisville
18,468
14. Lancaster
17,448
18,324
15. White Settlement
15,080
15,834
MEAN: 20,502
22,575
MEDIAN:
24,132
Cancellation of September 22 Council Meeting is requested because
there will not be a quorum.
0
s
� ` k
DUMAS, HUGUENIN, BOOTMMAN & MORROW
1212 KIRBY BUILDING 1509 MAIN STREET
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
1214) 741-3458
W. P. DUMAS (1890-1947)
A. BRYCE HUGUENIN
SAN ANTONIO OFFICE
CLAUD 0. BOOTHMAN
ELBERT M. MORROW
2200 TOWER LIFE BUILDING
August 28, 1980 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
ED H. ESOUIVEL
78205
RICHARD W. HARRIS
(512) 223-284t
RICHARD D. HUFF
Ms. Jeanette Moore
City Secretary
P. 0. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: $2,400,000 "City of North Richland Hills, Texas, Waterworks
and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 1980`. dated
September 1, 1980
Dear Ms. Moore:
Enclosed please find a notice of meeting to be posted
in accordance with the attached memorandum. Said notice
pertains to the meeting of the City Council to be held on
September 8, 1980, and is concerned with the action to be
taken by the Council with respect to the issuance and sale
of the above described bonds.
If a notice of meeting has already been posted for
such meeting and said notice includes the subject matter .
mentioned above, the enclosed notice may be discarded.
With kind personal regards and best wishes, I am,
Very truly yours,
EHE : df
Enclosures
CC: Mr. Harold. Mclnroe
"fir
w
NOTICE OF MEETING
U
NOTICE is hereby given that the governing body of
the City of North Richland Hills 2 Texas
will meet at 6 : 30 o 1 clock p .M. on the 8th day of
September 19, 80, at its regular meeting place at
the .City Hall
in the City of _ North Richland Hilly Texas., f or the purposes of
considering all matters incident and related to the issuance and
sale of $2,400,000 "CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, WATERWORKS
AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 198011, dated September 1,
1980, including the receipt of bids therefor and the passage of an
ordinance authorizing the issuance of the bonds.
It is an urgent public necessity that the matters be
considered at an early date in order that the required improve-
ments may . be obtained at an early date as to further the public
welfare of .the inhabitants of the aforesaid ;overrimental unit.
Administrative Off icer
0
VR.1 InRANM Ul T,
. �_ A T .C.S . requires that written notice r.-►ust be given of the date, hour,
• ' ' o f each meeting t �.n held by the gov e rn in? body o f a governmental entity.
a an'. suD3 ec t g
e must be posted ted "for at least 72 hours nrecec�� the day of the rieeting,
r. written notic P it - which shall. be expressed
a rce t that in case of emergency or urgent public necess Y , r e meeting
P
e it shall be sufficient i f notice is posted two hours before ore t
�, the ra C i c ,
++ r:terenc • rneetin�s special notice by telephone or te? eg,01
raph
is convened . In cases of e
_ g � P - which ch has previously filed a
be given in advance of the meeting to any news media w hl p
.:.us L also
' ce at the headquarters ters of the governmental body and consented
request for such special note q
-- incurred b the governmental body in prOz'iding such special. _
Co pay any and all expenses y g
no ti.ce .
Places of Posting
CITY The City Eall on the bulletin boards
COUNTY The Courthouse on the bulletin board.
SCHOOL DISTRICT --
on a bulletin board in its central admiLni.strative office and,
dd3.t3.oli shall either furnish a notice to the County Clerk.
ina ,
t in which most, if not aZl, of the school distr�.ct's
in the county
pupils reside or shall give notice by telephone or telegraph to any
- media re ues sting such notice and consenting to pay any and all
news m Q a
expenses incurred in providing special. notice.
WINTER DISTRIC
T OTHHER DISTRICT, OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION---
(a)
covering all or part of four or more counties - at its
administrative
office and delivered to the Secretary o f State
tan in the State Capitol; and. also delivered to the
for posting
County Clerk y
of the count in which the adminis tratrive office of
the district or
rict other political subdivision is located for posting
on the bulletin board in the county courthouse.
(b) all others
--- at its administrative off ice and delivered to
the County Clerk of the county or counties in which located for
os ting on the bulletin board in the county courthouse.
P o
DIES notice ice to be delivered to the Secretary of State
STATE GOVE.R1T�'NTAL BO
for posting in the Capitol Building.
The Attorney General takes the position that a meeting held tZthout the posting of the
• recent Court of Civil Appeals decision supports this
required notice is a nu3.la.ty • A Clerk or the Secretary o f State,
T notice is to be posted by the County
roszt�.on . .here
certification that the notice was timely deliverede
he -,rill assume that it was done upon .
Enclosed is a. fora of notice.
DUiUkS , 11UGUENIN 2 B00TU3%\],N* INNYD MORR01q
14
.Richard Albin, City Engineer, will be giving the presentation on this
• program.
0
40