HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1980-12-08 Agendas
þ .
...
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ..
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
e
F() '{~ th e Meet i ng December 8, 1980 t at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
)
NUt4J ER· ITEM ACTION TAKEN
PRE-CQUNC IL
6:15 P.M.
1 . Discussion on personnel benefi ts
presented by Don Lunday, Director of
Finance (closed due to subject matter)
2. Presentation on Cable TV Board by
Ji m ~Jood, Councilman
....- -~- -,-~..~-~.>._- ~
3. Discussion on computer system
presented by Dick Pinner, Computer
Committee
4. Discussion on appointments to
Park & Recreation Board of ."
- -.-..- -' . ~'.. ....I.
Commi ss i on
,j,¡ .oW 1.
5. Presentation on Social Security
I withdrawal by Dennis Horvath,
Assistant City Manager
6. Discussion on Mackey Creek Channel
Improvement, presented by Richard
Albin, City Engineer
COUNCIL
7 : 30 P. ~1.
-..
1 . Call to o rd e r
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
l
e
CITY OF NORTH .RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
fur· the Meet i ng
D~cember 8, 1980
t at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUPeER· ; ITEM ACTION TAKEN
4. Approval of ' Minutes of Special
Meeting November 17, 1980
5. Approval of Minutes of Special
Meeting November 22, 1980
6. Proclamation - Presented to Ron Weller,
proclaiminq North Hills \~eek
December 1 5 - 21
.-._~.--"~~ -
7. Confirmation of appointment of
George C. Tucker to Planning & Zoning
Board' of Commission
8. Consideration of appointment of
Dr. Oa 1 e Ga ski 11 to Community Cable .'"
~ ......- . -
Advisory Panel
9. PS 80-53, Request of Schick Shadel
Hospital for final plat of Lot 1,
Block D, Calloway Farms Addition
10. Public Hearing - PZ 80-36, Request
of Marvin Smith to rezone Lot 15R,
Block 1, Richland Oaks Addition, from
IF-12-0ne Family Dwellings to Local
Retail
-..
11 . Consideration of Ordinance for
PZ 80-36
12. Public Hearinq - PZ 80-38, Request of
Ron Lusk to rezon~ Tract lOA1, Abstract
1606, from IF-9-0ne Family Dwellings to
2F~9-Two Family Dwellings
e
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
f'l)'~ the Meeting
December 8~ 1980
tat 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUt4JER ; ITEM ACTION TAKEN
13. Consi'deratiön of Ordinance for
P Z 80~·.38
14. PS 80-.47, Request of Ron Lusk for
final plat of Lots 8~-14, Block 8,
Ri-·ch 1 and He fgh ts Addition
15 ~ Public Hearing - PZ 80~4l, Request of
Pi'zza Hut of North Texas to rezone
........ Lot 1 , Block 25, Clearview Addition,
...-- --..-..---.......--.-.-....-.- -
from Loca 1 Re ta i 1 to Local Reta;'l ~.
Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic
BeveraQes
16. Cons i-deration of Ord;-nance for
;..
PZ 80 ~ 41
- - ...-- ,--
17 . Public Hearing - PZ 80~42, Request of
..
Dr. James Waggener to rezone Tract 170
and a portiün of Tract16B, Abstract
1606, from 1 F- 7"- One Family Dwellings
to Local Retail
18. Consideration of Ordinance for
PZ 80-42
19 . Public Hearing - PZ 80-43, Request of
Russel M. Haws "to rezone Tract 3B,
----""
Abstract 308, from Multi-Family to
Local Reta i 1
20. Consideration of Ordinance for -
PZ 80-43
-
e
fo}~ the Meet i ng
CITY OF NORTH RrCHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
December 8, 1980
tat 7:30 p.m.t in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. loop 820.
NUt4JER· ; ITEM ACTION TAKEN
21 . PS 80~55, Request of Russel M. Haws
for final plat'of Lot 2, Block 5,
RichlandOaks Addition
22. Consideration of Computer System
specifications
23. Consideration of Ordinance for
policies and procedures for water
...~..... and sewerage system, presented by
...--~-~-....- -
Richard Albin and Allen Bronstad
24. Consideration 'Of Ordinance amending
Es tes contract
;>.-
25. Public Hearinq ~ annexation of property
'- J.... ~ . ~_'_~~ _
(revision boundary with Haltom City)
-
26. Consideration of Resolution for
Traffic Engineering Survey
27. Consideration of Ordinance for
disposition of stolen, abandoned, and
found property in possession of
Police Department
28. Consideration of Resolution for
...
unauthorized street cuts on Rufe
----,...
Snow Drive
29. Consideration of plans for Mackey
Creek Channel Improvements, Phase II
e
Fo.,~ the Meeting December 8, 1980
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
t at 7:30p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUrtJER· ITEM ACTION TAKEN
30. Consideration of payment to Fi rs t
Southwest Company in th:e amount of
$26,665.52 - Water & Sewer Bonds
31 . Consideration of withdrawal from
Social Security Program
32. Adjournment
..--..1 -- -
...... '_h .__ --- - -
.............--
a
-..
r
l
..
e
!
¡
,
,
.
I
I
Lj
/
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS..
TEXAS~ HELD IN THE CITY HALL~ 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820_ NOVEMBER 17.. 1980 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Mayor Faram called the special meeting to order November 17, 1980, CALL TO ORDER
at 7:30 p.m.
2. Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Kenna
Jim Hood
J. C. Hubbard
Wiley Thomas
Bob Brady
Sharyl Groves
Staff:
Chuck Hilliams
Jeanette Moore
Dennis Horvath
J. r~. t1adera
Allen Bronstad
Jim Ramsey
Don Bo\~en
r~a rÇJ i e N ash
Ricnard Albin
Press:
Kelvin Tood
Joe Norton
Rosemary Curran
Absent:
Dave Freeman
Rex ~1cEnti re
3. The invocation was given by ~1rs. Mary Vlolfle.
Mayor
Councilmen
Councilwoman
Ci ty ~1anager
City Secretary
Asst. City Manager
Public Works Director
Utility Director
Civil Service Member
Planning & Zoning Member
Pl anni ng & Zoni ng t1ember
C,ty Engineer
North Richland News
News Tribune
t1id-Cities News
Councilman
City Attorney
4. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve the minutes of the October 27, 1980, meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
5. Mayor Faram presented Mrs. Peggy Brothers with a Twenty Year
certificate and pin with three stones for twenty years of service
in the Utility Department.
Mayor Faram called for Mr. & Mrs. Allen Bronstad to come
forward. Mayor Faram presented t1r. Bronstad with a certificate
and pin with three stones for twenty years of service in the
Utility Department.
Mayor Faram thanked Mrs. Brothers and Mr. Bronstad for their
service to the city.
ROLL CALL
INVOCATIOrJ
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES OF REGULA
r·1EETING OCTOBER
27 ~ 1980
PRESENTATION OF
20 YEAR SERVICE
A\~JARD TO PEGGY
BROTHERS AND ALLE
BRONSTAD, UTILITY
DEPART~~ENT, IN
RECOGNITION OF
20 YEARS OF SERVI
November 17, 1
Page 2
6.
City Manager Williams read the following proclamation:
WHEREAS, Texas Community Colleges are exemplary institutions,
considered among the nation's leaders; and,
[
WHEREAS, more than one-half million persons annually enroll for
credit and non-credit classes in the sixty Texas Community Colleges; and,
WHEREAS, these colleges are located within commuting distance of
more than 90% of the state's population; and,
WHEREAS, Texas Community Colleges are sensitive to the educational
needs of the people they serve, and respond quickly and effectively to
these needs; and,
WHEREAS, these colleges are serving people of all ages, with a
wide variety of post-secondary educational offerings; and,
HHEREAS, Texas Community Colleges are heartily endorsed by
community leaders in business and industry; and,
\~HEREAS, the Texas Public Community/Junior College Association has
set aside a week for the observance of Texas Community College Week;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Dick Faram, r'·1ayor of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, do hereby proclaim November 16-22, 1980 as
TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE WEEK
and urge all citizens to be contingent and supportive of this excellent
public source for quality, low-cost, post-secondary education.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I
have hereunto set my hand
and caused the seal of North
Richland Hills, Texas to be
affixed this 17th day of
November, A. D., 1980
Dick Faram - Mayor
Mr. Williams replied yes.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
PS 80-42, FINAL
PLAT OF LOT 4,
BLOCK 2, r~ORTH-
PARK PLAZA
ADDITION,
CAMBRIDGE DEVELOF
APPROVED
7. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to
approve PS 80-42.
Councilwoman Groves asked if all the Engineer's comments
had been taken care of.
.
¡
.
-
(
8. Councilman Thomas moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to approve PS 80-45.
Motion carried 6-0.
9. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Charles Beane, Box 671, Lindale, Texas, owner of the
property, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Beane stated this property was originally zoned into
eleven small lots for town houses. Mr. Beane stated he
wanted to replat into three lots and build quadroplexes.
Councilman Wood asked t1r. Beane if the Council approved this
request would he have objections to the permit stating
quadroplexes.
Mr. Beane replied he had no objections.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
of this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed
the public hearing.
10. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded ~ Councilman Wood,
to approve PZ 80-37, Ordinance No. 857.
Motion carried 5-1; Councilmen Kenna, Wood, Hubbard, Thomas
and Brady voting for; Councilwoman Groves voting against.
11. Councilwoman Groves moved, seconded by Councilman Brady,
to approve PS 80-43.
Motion carried 6-0.
12. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Delbert Stembridge, engineer, appeared before the Council
to represent Mr. Pearson.
Mr. Stembridge stated Mr. Pearson owned five acres on Bursey
Road. t1r. Pearson recently buil t a new home on the property
and he wanted to subdivide the rest of the property and build
two one family dwellings. Mr. Stembridge stated t1r. Pearson
had agreed to build IF-l211 homes.
November 17, 19~
Page 3
PS 80-45, FINAL
PLAT OF LOT 16,
EDGLEY ADDITION
TESCO
APPROVED
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 80-37, REQUES
OF CHARLES BEANE
TO REZONE LOTS 1
28, BLOCK 4281,
RICHLAND TERRACE
ADDITION, FROr·1
SPECIFIC USE-
COMMUNITY UNIT
DEVELOP~1ENT TO
MULTIPLE FAr·1ILY
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 80-37
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 857
PS 80-43, REPLAT
OF LOTS 18-28,
BLOCK 4281,
RICHLAND TERRACE
ADDITION
APPROVED
PUBLIC HEARING -
PZ 80-39, REQUEST
OF CLIFFORD
PEARSON TO REZONE
TRACT lA4,
ABSTRACT 1399,
FRON AGRICULTURE
TO IF-9-0NE
FANIL Y Dl*JELLINGS
Councilman Kenna asked if Meadowview Terrace would go
through this property.
City Engineer Albin stated Meadowview Terrace would go
approximately 200 feet west of the property.
Councilman Wood stated the map only showed 50 foot of right-
of-way for Bursey Road and it should be 80 feet.
Mr. Albin stated 80 feet of right-of-way was shown on the plat.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
of this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed
the public hearing.
13. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves~
to approve PZ 80-39, Ordinance No. 858.
Motion carried 6-0.
14. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Brady,
to approve PS 80-49, subject to the Engineers' comments
and the stipulation of 80 feet of right-of-way shown on
the plat.
Motion carried 6-0.
COUNCILMAN FREEMAN NOW PRESENT.
15. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
forward.
Mr. Marion Massey, attorney representing Drake Enterprises,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Massey stated Drake was the owner of the building
where Jamie's was located. Mr. Massey stated Jamie's was
one of the nicest restaurants located on Bedford Euless Rd.
Mr. Massey stated other restaurants on Bedford Euless Rd. had
specific use permits for the sale of alcoholic beverages.
Mr. Massey stated this request was not a question of zoning
but appeared to be a question of fairness and competition.
Mr. Massey stated that the requirements on parking for this
type of business was 36 spaces and Jamie's would have
95 spaces.
Mr. Massey asked the Council IS approval of this request.
November 1 7, 1 ~.~ 'J
Page 4
CONSIDERATION
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 80-39
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO.
PS 80-49, FIN:
PLAT OF LOTS
BLOCK 1, PE
ADDITION
APPROVED
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 80-40, REQUE~~
OF DRAKE ENTER-
PRISES, INC.,
(JAMIE'S RESTAURf
TO REZONE LOT 3
BLOCK 2, COCHRÞ'J
ADDITION FROt·1
COr,1~1ERC I AL TO
CO~1~1ERCIAL SPECr
USE-SALE OF
ALCOHOL I C BEVERAI
-,
I
j
),
.
I
\,
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
16. Mayor Faram advised the Council there was a legal petition
in opposition to this request and it would take six
affirmative votes for passage.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to
approve PZ 80-40, Ordinance No. 859, permit non-transferable
and in the name of John Drake.
Motion carried 7-0.
17. This item moved to the end of the agenda due to the City
Attorney not being present.
18. Mayor Faram advised this would be the second public hearing
on Revenue Sharing. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Williams to
state what the funds would be used for.
Mr. Williams stated the proposed use of Revenue Sharing
Funds was to purchase two fire trucks at a cost of $106,000.00
and $50,000.00 for a computer.
Mr. Williams stated the city had received confirmation of
the Revenue Sharing from Congressman Jim Wright1s office.
Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak to please come forward.
Mrs. Mel Shank, 6925 Post Oak, Smithfield, appeared before
the Council.
Mrs. Shank asked if the fire trucks were in use at this
time.
tt1r. ltJilliams stated no, the fire trucks were on order.
Mrs. Shank asked where the trucks would be located.
Mr. Williams stated one would be at Station I, Smithfield
and the other one would be at Station II, Glenview Drive.
Mrs. Shank asked what brand of computer the City planned
to purchase.
November 17, 1980
Page~
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR
PZ 80-40
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 859
PUBLIC HEARING -
PURPA - ANNUAL
REPORT ON ELECTRI
AND GAS UTILITIES
PRESENTED BY
REX ~1cENTIRE,
CITY ATTORNEY
PUBLIC HEARING -
REVENUE SHARING
FUNDS, SECOND
HEARING
Mr. Williams stated the city had not gone out for
bids on the computer yet. The specifications for
the computer were put together by a citizens group.
Mrs. Shank asked if the city had trained personnel
to operate the computer.
r·1r.' Hilliams stated the training ",ould be built into
the contract.
Mrs. Shank states she felt the city should buy an
IBM computer.
Mayor Faram"stated the city would have to go out
for bids on the computer.
There being no one else wishing to speak~ Mayor Faram
closed the Public Hearing.
19. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to reject the bid for the pickup since only one bid
was received and go out for new bids.
Motion carried 7-0.
Recess.
The same staff and council were present as recorded
at the beginning of the meeting.
17. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing on the following
eleven Rate and Service Standards of PURPA:
1. Cost of Service - Electric rates should, to the greatest
extent possible reflect the cost of providing service to
each class of consumer.
2. Declining Block Rates - The unit cost of electric service
for large volume consumers should not decrease as consumption
increases. That is, declining block rates should not be
permitted.
3. Time-of-Day Rates - Rates should reflect the variable cost
of providing service at different times of the day, unless
such rates would not be cost-effective. In other words, if
it costs more to produce electricity in the afternoon,
rates for electricity consumed in the afternoon should be
higher, and rates for other times of day should be lower.
4. Seasonal Rates - Rates should reflect the variable cost of
providing service during different seasons of the year. If,
for example, it costs more to produce electricity in the summer,
rates for electricity consumed in the summer should be higher,
and rates for other times of the year should be lower.
November 17, 19[(
Page ft,
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
PUBLIC HEARING -
PURPA - ANNUAL
REPORT ON ELECTRI
GAS UTILITIES,
PRESENTED BY REX
McENTIRE, CITY
ATTORNEY
~
i
(
.
-
November 17, 1980
Page ,
5. Interruptible Rates - Each electric utility should offer
industrial and commercial customers the opportunity to
choose an lIinterruptible rate. If Customers who choose an
lIinterruptible ratell would agree to let the utility curtail
their electric service during periods of peak loads; in
return, the customer pays a reduced rate.
6. . Load Management Techniques - Each el ectri c uti 1 ity shoul d
implement load management techniques which spread consumers'
demands for electrical energy evenly throughout the day. Such
techniques include time-of-day rates and residential load
(or usage) controls.
7. Master Metering - For newly-constructed office buildings,
apartment houses and other multiple-tenant structures, each
unit should have its own separate electric meter, rather than
having the building connected to a single master meter.
8. Automatic Fuel Adjustment Clauses - Automatic fuel adjustment
clauses, under which an electric utility is permitted to
unilaterally raise its rates to keep pace with fuel price
increases, should be prohibited. Rate increases should always
be subject to review by the regulatory body exercising jurisdiction.
9. Consumer Information - Each electric utility should provide
consumers with complete information regarding its rates~ including
a schedule of rates and a description of the methods by which
rates are calculated.
10. Termination of Service - Electric service should not be terminated
because a consumer has been delinquent in payments until after the
consumer has received prior notice and an opportunity to dispute
the reason(s) for termination. Additionally, service should never
be terminated for a delinquent customer whose health would be
threatened by the terrni nati on.
11. Advertising - No electric utility should be permitted to pass on
the cost of advertising to consumers. Advertising expenses should
be borne by the Company's shareholders.
Notices have been sent to the two utilities effected.
City Attorney McEntire asked for comments and suggestions
from the audience. There were none.
The City Attorney asked for input by the effected utilities.
Mr. R. L. Fain from Texas Electric Service Company appeared
and announced that he had previously delivered TESea'S written
comments and suggestions. These suggestions were admitted
into evidence.
No representation of Lone Star Gas Company appeared.
Motion was made by Councilman Brady, seconded by Councilman
Hubbard, that each utility company be given 30 days from this
date to submit written recommendations ,and suggestions.
Motion carried 7-0.
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna,
,that the public hearing be recessed until February 9~ 1981~
7:30 p.m. and that the staff consider the evidence and
come up with recommendation at that time.
Motion carried 7-0.
20. t1ayor Faram adjourned the meeting of November 17, 1980.
November 17, 198C
Page $
ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram, ~1ayor
ATTEST:
( Jeanette Moore~ City Secretary
I
I "
(
,
{
.
(
I
--
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS.
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 fJORTHEAST
LOOP 820, NOVEMBER 22, 1980 - 8:30 A.M.
1 .
Mayer Faram called the meeting to order November 22, 1980 at
8:30 a.m.
2. Present:
Dick Faram
Jim Kenna
Jim \'Jood
J. C. Hubbard
~Ji 1 ey Thomas
Bob Brady
Dave Freeman
Sharyl Groves
t1ayor
Councilmen
Councilwoman
Staff:
Chuck Hilliams
Dennis Horvath
Rex t1cEnti re
Richard Albin
Ci ty tt1anager
Assistant City t1anager
City Attorney
City Engineer
Absent:
Jeanette f'10ore
City Secretary
Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting to executive session.
Mayor Pro Tern Freeman called the meeting back to order.
All Council members and staff were present as recorded at the
beginning of the meeting with the exception of Mayor Faram.
1. Council had a prolonged discussion of the problems connected
with the City of Watauga's failure to take affirmative action
on the Rufe Snow Drive project.
It was the consensus that the City of North Richland Hills
Council needed to consider an alternate route north of the
Railroad right-of-way.
City Attorney McEntire read the following Resolution.
WHEREAS, the Ci~ Council of North Richland Hills,
Texas, has planned and proposed to convert Rufe Snow Drive
into a five lane major thoroughfare between Loop 820 and
Fair Meadow Drive; and,
. .
WHEREAS, the said City Council had relied upon the cooperation
of the City of Watauga in the proposed assessment program and
the acquisition of right-of-way in connection with said project; and,
~JHEREAS, the City of !'Jatauga had failed to give the City
of North Richland Hills the contemplated cooperation in this regard.
--
,~
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
EXECUTIVE SESSION
BACK TO ORDER
DISCUSSION AND
POSSIBLE ACTION 0
RUFE SNOH DRIVE
PROBLE~1 DEALING
~JITH ASSESSr1ENT
AND RIGHT-OF-WAY
AS IT PERTAINS TO
THE CITY OF
t'JATAUGA
RESOLUTION
NO. 80-36
r
l
NOH, THEREFORE, be it Resolved by the City Council of the
City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that;
1 .
The City Engineer be and is hereby authorized to prepare for
the taking of bids for the proposed Rufe Snow Drive improvements
between Loop 820 and Industrial Park Boulevard (South of St. Louis
and Southwestern Railroad right-of-way).
2.
That the City Engineer prepare alternate plans for construction
north of said R · . ht-of-way by moving proposed thoroughfare
east along th north side of said Railroad right-of-way and north
through the cen er 0 e City of North Richland Hills approximately
one mile east of Rufe Snow Drive and north of Bursey Road.
Passed and approved this 22nd day of November, 1980.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves, to
approve Resolution No. 80-36 as presented.
Motion carried 6-0.
2. City Attorney t·1cEntire read the follo'tJing resolution:
WHEREAS, the below named department heads and/or Chief's
have been appointed by the City Manager; and,
WHEREAS, such appointees have served a sufficient period
of time to indicate that each is able to adequately perform
in his respective position.
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, that the below named appointments
by the City t·1anager are confi rmed by the Ci ty Counei 1 :
November 22, 19E(
p,age 2
RESOLUT I ON Of~
DEPARTt'1ENT . -
CONF I Rt1ATI ÚI1
,ô,PPROVED
RESOLUTION NQ
80-35
Randy Shiflet
John Lynn
r~i ke Chenaul t
Ron t·1cKi nney
David Looney
Johnny Howard
Tim Price
Dennis Horvath
Marylin Roberts
Ann Cannon
Laura Prewitt
Allen Bronstad
Don Lunday
Stan Gertz
Jack Long
Police Central Services
Police Criminal Investigation
Police Uniform Patrol
Police Administrative Services
Fire Operations
Fire ~1arshall
Arson Prevention
General Administrative Services
Office of Management
Tax Assessor/Collector
Librarian
Utilities Director
Finance Director
Chief of Fire
Chief of Police
Passed and approved this 22nd day of November~ 1980.
~
.
I
í,
(
¡
¡
--
tit
November 22, 1980
Page 3
Councilman Brady moved, seconded by Councilrnan Kenna,
to approve Resolution No. 80-35, as presented.
Motion carried 6-0.
3. This item was added to the agenda.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Wood,
to appoint Mr. George Tucker to the Planning & Zoning
Commission.
APPOINTr'1ENT OF
PLANNING & ZONING
t·1Et1BER TO PLANNINI
& ZONING COMMISS-
ION
Motion carried 6-0.
Confirmation of this appointment will be placed on the
December 8, 1980, meeting agenda.
Mayor Pro Tern Freeman adjourned the special meeting of
November 22, 1980.
ADJOURNr·1ENT
Mayor Pro Tern - Dave Freeman
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore - City Secretary
Ii
t¡
7
DATE: 12/3/80
e
SUBJECT:
Planning & Zoning Commission Appointment
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND:
Ci ty f~anaqer
Confirmation of appointment is required for George Tucker
to become a member of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
,
e
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
This is a council appointment.
BUDGETED ITE~1:
YES N/A NO
ACCOUNT NU~ÎBER:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e
/ ~~~." Â..?
~ - .... - -
PROFILE 'FOR PROSPECTIVE CO~~ISSION ÞŒMBERS
~ al!le r: 0 01""-.a- ~ rt . . T 1. J r-, k- p r
(. \.... '--' .... . - -' ~ - ~ .:.;; ~.. -
('-~ddreSS lGO'Í piamOl1d LQcb ~.. 1'1ortr.J, Ri (~:n 1 ~Dd rri 1,1 q i
'rx
'2h 11 ,g
Efi1ployer Loc1c\vood Greene ~n,q~-'1eers
Phone: Home, 2~4-1114
~'li fa's l'Iame P8;¡-ct7:~~r
.- v
Office 214-24]-6JôJ
Children ',s l'lame ánd' Ages
Braden, lð years
. . ,
Resident 'of the Çity since April 1, 1975'
/
Previous Residence 3205 Glasgo\'l Terr. Arlington, Tx.
Occupation
Engineer--Projebt 'Manag~r
Do you O1o1n real propat'ty in Nor-th. Rich1and Hills?
V· . ....r
. e s . .' ~\.
. .
M€mbershìpa~ Organizations and Previous E:~erience 'on City Commission:'
(~rican Society of Mechanical Engineers; American Management Assn.
, .
~~ - . & Nä .
."..
. .
Cor-anent {About yourself, why you wish to serv~, qualifications and ot..;"cr
- .
pertin~nt information~)
I am a concerned citizen and' a professional engineer interested ín
assisting the ~ity of North Richland Hills in~planned growth taking. in the
. .
factors of environment, capacity of city services, area occupancy mix,
and traffic. Having over twenty years experience ·in the area of residential,
commercial. industrial, and m~nicipàl planning/design, I feel ·that I can
contribute some of this 'experience towards the growth goals of the City of
(- North Richland Hills.
..................--.. ~ .....
"'~-...
U.!.\ It:.: JJL13L3"~_
-g
SUBJECT: Request for Rl?pln,errPnf- Mcrnher to Commun:'ty C-ah-lc Advi.5oty r"êiÜel
-
DEPARTr-!ENT: Community Cab}!"> AdVi sor:y P¿;n",'
BACKGROUND : Billy Smith, irliti¿Ü !1]p:nh"'t:' <:;"', crreri by co"ncil to serve an the
also employed by Birdville ISO, 1.1'i hpinl] r"'comr.-:cncd by t¡H'~ fJdIlel to De
panel representinq the school di~~rjr~, h~~ recigneè. Ot. Dctle Gasklll,
the council's December 8th meetinq.
"prr.j n" cd +-0 £0 r"e ir. r·~r. Smi::'h' 3 p03i tian. TJ Ú::¡ w::-eù", La be done at:
e
----.--.--..---
C I T Y CO U r~ elL ACT I 0 ì~ R E QUI REO :
A !ì :-')!]; {"1i-~,::1!1 t- oJ ~ ...D r. D 31 e--Ga::: ~ i II t o-t-A-e-
Community Cable Advisory P~npl_
8 U 0 GET E 0 I T E r~1 :
YES
NO
ACCOUNT NUi'1BER:
~-------------------------------------~
---------------------------------------
e
City or ~rth P\..ichland Hills~ Texas
TO:
MAYOR AJ:.JD CITY COIDJCIL
DATE: l\lo'';lernber 19, '1.980
FHOi"! :
Community Cable Advisory Panel
SUBJEcr: Resignation from Panel ~ HecoI\'h'1:endation for Rf.:placement
At our regular n10rlthly meet ir¡g on Tuesday, r-;o....rember 18th, trle pa:1~l
rccei\red Billy Smith's resignationv r'ir. S!nith 11as nuynl)erous tirne-
consuming c02nmitì11ents req~Jirinq his time. rJlr. Smith suç;qested to
the panel the name of Dr. Dale Gaskill, also a me~)er of the
Birdville Independent School Dist.rict, to serve as the school
representative in his place.
;\5 trle ordinance stipulërtes that a memb'~r of the school system serve
on tl1e panel, panel I:lernbers voteà ùnaniF1ol1s1y to recommend Dr. Gas1cill
to the City (:OtlJ1Cil to be appointed at the cotlDCil f s m'eeting orl
December 8th.. Dr. G:l.s~<il1 has agreed to havirlg his na!ne placed
before the council.
~.V7..1 d ,q'
''~IA(/. ~~~~~
~IrC B~V~lY Riley pi
Chai rpe!.."SO!1
-¡;é/ · ¿?
-. \;-~. r:-t....e-<=..:/
.,,-, I¡'~
(817) 281-0041 4101 MORGAN CIRCLE i P. O. BOX 13305 I NORTH RICHLAND HILLSr TEXAS 76113
e
I ~1\¡.'~.i~_. . ..,Q4
t)/\ . k.~
\_~/\ ," t--v
\"~'·A' /(,'52/
~ VI Ir:~~
\, ~.~.. rw
W11 ¡fIWj
~, . ."~~1
~/~~þ' B~RDVHJ.JE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
~~~ -------------- .-.---.------------.... .
- 6125 L 13[: LKNAP · fORT WORTH, r EXAS 76 J 17 . (817) 831-0951
~:
BI L L Y H. S!\lITH
Sllpl'r¡n[Cllu~nt
. November 18, 1980
Mrs. Beverly Riley
4917 Strummer Dr.
Fort Worth, TX 76118
Dear Mrs. Riley,
Due to numerous time-consuming cowmitments, I find
it necessary to resign from the Cable T.V. Advisory Board,
effective as of November 18, 1980.
e
Sincerely yours,
&!~ ;/I~ ~v~il/
Billy H. Smith
BHS: in
cc: Mr. Dan Echols
r"1r. Ma rv in Reed
Dr. Hal Brooks ~
Mr. Jim \'lood ~
Mrs. Laura Prewitt
e
I
~
.,.~, (
Page 2
e
PZ 80-43
APPROVED
(4 were contacted)
PS 80-55
APPROVED
Request of Russel M. Haws to rezone Tract
38, Abstract 308, from its present classi-
fication of Multi-Family to a proposed
classification of Local Retail.
This property is located on the north side
of Airport Freeway Frontage Road, approxi-
mately 250 ft. southwest of the intersection
of Weyland Drive and the Frontage Road.
Request of Russel M. Haws for final plat of
Lot 2, Block 5, Richland Oaks Addition, 5th
Filing.
-
-
e
e
.
SUBJECT:
DEP ARTì~!ENT:
BAC'KGROU NO:
. (
\,
DATE:
11-25-80
{
\
PS 80-53 Final Plat of lot 1, Block 0, Calloway Farms Addition
..~
Pl anni.ng and· Zoni ng Department
This is the final plat of Schick Shadel Hospital.
They have agreed to all the Engineer·s comments.
t ~
The Planning,and ~oning·Commision recommended approval of this final plat,
. .....
~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial ~of fin~l plat.
BUDGETED I TEr~1: YES . NO X
ACCOUNT r·iU¡,iS ER: N/A
...
--~--~~~~--~-------------~----------------------~---~-~--~~-------~~---~~--~~-~
Page 3
p & Z r·1i nutes
November 20, 1980
(
"
(
c·-
'--
-..-.... ...._..,..--_.'........._~. _.......J..,.....~. ~.__.~......
...~... .:.---..".-.
- -. .-' -"., .-.....- - . ~.
". ---- -- -- -< - __.1. .
--~--.. . - ~
There being no one \~Jishing to speak Iß:!fdrding
these requests, the Chairman cl~?the public
hearing. .~~..~
~~¢'!I'''
r'1rs. Nash moved, ?J~,Gônaed by r·1r. BO\'Ien) to
approve PS 80;:,5l~~"subject to the Engi neerl s
commentsafltf'~submi ss i on of Construction Plans
and J:,heírapprova 1 by the Ci ty Engi neer, and
/to::"'šatisfy the additional easements for the
.-;~~:;,~Ç;;~:'~~ uti 1 i ty compani es. r~oti on carri ed 3-0.
Ä~p~gv~~ _#~.r~,/_<ë#,,~;~~á~7'- ~~pr~~~e~s m~~=~2 ~~~j~~~d t~y t~~S Ën~~~~~r ~~
'l~~4t'~ comrnents and submi 5S i on of Construct; on Pl an's
-#r
~~~ and their approval by the City Engineer, and
~ to satisfy the additional easements for the
~ J. ~_. ..._~~~~~~~~_
PS 80-51
APPROVED
PS 80-53
Request of Schick Shadel Hospital for final
plat of Lot 1, Block 0, Calloway Farms Addn.
(e
Ted Everage, Everage Engineers, came forward
to represent Schick Hospital in their request.
Mr. Everage said they had received the City
Engineer's letter and agree to all the comments
eXcEpt item #1 which there is some question
as to \'¡hat it means.
Mr. Greenfield said to disregard item #1.
r·h~. Everage said they \'iould give any easements
that are necessary.
The Chairman called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of or in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak regarding
this request, the Chairman closed the public
hearing.
(
\,
PS 80-53 Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Bowen, to
APPROVED approve PS 80-53 subject to the Engineer's
comments. Motion carried 3-0.
-PS 80~5~~-='=-~==-~-~-~~~-~;fêì:;k--B';;t;-;s ~~~.¡ ;~;y p I at
of Lots 1-16, B~l-)--Hmrlñdustrial Park.
.
Gordon Swift, Consulting Engineer, came forward
to represent Clark Brothers in their request.
-
e
.. ~..
"5i' w.....~ )~""IN. ~)I"''''''~~~.Â"\-''' ~#:~;¡.z::.:'~~~~~:~...:,-::#_...~_~_.(;.:'~~~~,.~~ a L
e
e
e
IIERJ4(;E
1Vt;IIVEERS
& ASSOCIATES
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 13305
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: Ms. Wanda Calvert
720 Seminary South Office Buifding
Fort Worth, Texas 76115
Metro (817) 429-9321
December 2, 1980
SUBJECT: 3-910; City of North Richland Hills,
Calloway Farms, Lot 1, Block 0,
Revised Final Plat, PS 80-53
Dear Ms. Calvert,
This is to inform you that we have added the Planning and Zoning
Commission's and the City Council's endorsement blocks to the revised
Final Plat submitted to you November 20. 1980. You also have a letter of
commitment from Schick Hospital to extend any water mains before any
future construction as well as provide any required easements at that time.
The existing building is covered by the 300 foot radius requirement for
fire protection.
It is our understanding that the Special Use Zoning does not require
the addition of a set back line as referred to by the City Engineer.
Therefore the final plat has been revised to reflect all changes re-
quired by the City Engineers letter of November 11, 1980.
If you have any questions or need any additional data please feel
free to ca,ll me.
TE/pe
cc - Mr. Jim Roberts·
Schick Hospital
4101 Frawley Dr.
Fort Worth, Texas 76118
Yours very truly,
EVERAGE ENGINEERS & ASSOCIATES
~1YJ h£~V'/-~
J. M. Ted Everage, P.E.
President
221.00
e
e
tþ
/
(
\"
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
November 11, 1980
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-910, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
CALLOWAY FARMS, LOT 1, BLOCKS 0,
REVISED FINAL PLAT, PS 80-53
We have reviewed the captioned materials for the subject subdivision
and offer the following comments:
1. Building lot lines have not been shown on the plat. You may wish
to confer with the City Attorney concerning the requirements for
the Specific Use zoning associated with this lot.
2. Planning and Zoning and Council endorsement blocks should be shown
on the plat.
3. Utility companies should be contacted concerning their present as
well as future easement requirements if this has not already been
done.
4. The Developer's Engineer has indicated in his letter to the City of
North Richland Hills, dated September 25, 1980, that fire protection
coverage has not been provided for the entire lot since details of
future expansion have not been finalized. We would refer you to
Comment No. 1 of our letter dated October 20, 1980, concerning
this matter.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
r~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
Mr. J.M. Madera, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-621'. METRO/267-3367
SchickShLeJ
Hosnifai
...
(..
e
4101 FRA'yVlEY DRiVE
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118
(817) 284-9217
METRO 589-0444
9]
November 3, 1980
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: ~'Irs. ~'¡anda Calvert
RE: 3-910, City of North Richland Hills
Calloway Farms Addition
Lot 1, Block D
Revised Preliminary Plan
PS 80-35
e
This is to verify to the City of North Richland Hills that we will construct
the necessary utility easements to insure the 300 foot radius criteria is
met when plans are finalized for expansion of our facility. As ,ve noted in
the Planning and Zoning Meeting iT is not practical at this time to grant
easements or construct the water line until we have evaluated the various
options for our expansion.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Q 4t1 ~" " ..
, J" li ~
¡o~ · ¡ ~~,,-h
vJames D. Roberts
Assistant Administrator
SCHICK SHADEL HOSPITAL OF D/~v, INC.
JR: j h
e
e
rì e
e
/;
~(
((
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort vVorth-Dallas
October 20, 1980
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills~ Texas 76118
Subject: 3-910, CITY OF NORTH RICHLANDHILlS,
CALLOWAY FARMS ADDN., lOT 1, BLOCK D~
REVISeO PRELIMINARY PLAN, r~ 8J-39~&ð-~
We have reviewed the revised preliminary plan for the subject subdivision
and offer the following comments:
1. The Developer's Engineer has indicated that the existing structure
on this lot has sufficient fire coverage based on the prescribed
300 foot radius criteria although the entire lot is not covered.
He has suggested that full lot coverage is not necessary at this
time since plans for future improvements have not been finalized.
We would request that a provision be included in the City-Developer
Agreement that the Owner will provide additional fire hydrants,
water main extensions and easements as required for proper fire
coverage at such time that structures are built outside the
present coverage area on this lot.
2. The Developer should not be required to pay water and sewer pro
rata if he has already paid the appropriate tap fees. However,
additional tap fees will be required for additional service as
provided by the City·s Water and Sewer Policies.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hestitate to call.
R~JA/l j c
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
Mr. J.M. Madera, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/:283-6211. METRO/267-3367
~ ~I£';~' Wi~' .'£~ J:I.~ ~{'* ~. Jr.-
.., ~- .... ~ ..., ,;~
{. .,,~ ~~~. F f ~ ,,t... ~
¿it . iNGIJiNEER§
(
\
e
& ASSOCfATES
720 Seminary South Office Building
Fort VJorth, Texas 76115
Met ro (817) 429-9321
September 25, 1980
City of North Richland 'Hills, Texas
P.O. Box 13305
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: Ms. Wanda Calvert
Subject: 3-910 Calloway Farms Addition. Lot 1. Block D
Preliminary Plans, PS 80-35
Dear Ms. Calvert,
We have reviewed the letter from Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc.
and offer thè following comments:
e
1. Present ownership with volume and page numbers have been
added to the plat.
2. Acreage has been revised to show 4.00 acres..
3. Offsite drainage map is attached hereto showing that
the Southwest corner of this tract is the high point of
this area as stated previously on the preliminary plat.
We have added additional information concerning the .
culvert at our Northeast corner showing its capacity
exceeds the runoff from this site even if it were fully
developed.
4. The existing building is adequately covered by the
300 foot radius criteria. Since the details of any
improvements have not been determined at this time. we
do not bel ieve it is appropriate to extend any water-
. mains or add any· fire hydrants at this time.
5. Since this is an existing facil ity using and paying
for existing water supply and sewer service, this
suggestion seems inappropriate.
6. Utility and/or water line easements will be granted if
they are required when the details of future expansions
are mo r e fo rm~·l i z ed .
If there are further questions please give me a call.
Yours very truly,
EVERAGE ENGINEERS & ASSOCIATES
e
1m -kd &~Æ'a~
J. M. Ted Everage, P.E.
President
TEl pe
221.00
(
DATE:
11-25, 80
(
lð
e
SUBJECT:
PZ 80-36 Zoninq req~est from IF-12 to Local Rpt~il
. ~
DEPARTMENT: Plannin~ and Zoning
BACKGROUND: Marvin Smith wishes to build a 4000 sq~ ft., one-story office
building on this property which he says is dlstressed property that has a large
drainage ditch on it.
I
t ,
This property is ~ocatéd on the south side of Harwood Road at Grapevine Highway:
.There is approximately 4000 ft. frontage on Harwood Road.
There were 12 property owners within 200 feet of said.propertv who were contacted.
There were several property owners who contested this request..
e
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request.
..
If approved, this property will need to be replat~prl hpfore a building permit ~an
be issued.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial nf the zoning request.
BUDGETED I T Ef"1 : YES ~. NO X
ACCOUNT NU¡'lBER: N/A
...
----~--~~--~~-~----~-~-------------------~-------~----~-----------~-~--~---~~--
e
PAGE 5
P & Z
October 23, 1980
('
~Œ. Greenfield said the Commission
could not override the zoning or· nce
which requires a minimum dep f 110 ft.
He said the Commission c approve
this request subjec the engineer's
comments and th omment #6 be dealt
with prior coming in with the final
plat.
e
/
t
'-
ne Chairman called for anyone wishing
to speak regarding this request to
please come forward.
There being no one to speak~ the Chairman
closed tIle public. hearing.
Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash
to approve PS 80-50, subject to the
engineer's comments. Motion carried
3-0.
PZ 80-36
Request of Marvin Smith to rezone Lot 15R2~
Bloc;k 1, Richland Oaks Addition, from
its present classification of IF-12-
One Family D\velling to a proposéd
classification of Local Retail. This
property is located at the southeast
corner of Harwood Road and Grapevine
High'\vay.
e
(
Marvin Smith came forward. He said this
propertY.,is ;at the corner of Har"t.J'ood
Road and Grapevine Highway and lies
on the south side of Harwood Road.
Mr. Smith said this is distressed
property approximately 30,000 sq. ft.
with a 4,000 ft. frontage. He said it is
joined on the east by a large drainage
ditch.
Mr. Smith said he proposed to build
a 4,000 sq. ft., 1 story building
with a glass front a~d plenty of
off-street parking.
e
Mr. Smith said he did not want a convenienc
store such as a 7-11, be is interested
in office space. He said he would '.
like to have a real estate office,
doctor's office, insurance agency,
beauty shop) or barber shop. l'-lr. Smith
said there would be 3 or 4 spaces.'
(
\"
PAGE 6
p & Z
October 23, 1980
(-
~ (
(
(
Mr. Smith said he would rather have
professional office space, but would
consider a beauty or barber shop.
~Œ. Smith presented the Commission with
a preliminary plan of the property.
Mr. Smith said he didn't feel anyone
would want to build a house or duplex
on it. He said part of the lot will
have to be filled 4 or 5 feet. Mr. Smith
said he plans to leave some of the large
trees and plans to build a retainer wall
and a stockade fence. He said he also
plans to put in a sprinkler system.
Mr. Smith said provided the city would
a110't.] it, he '\vould like to plant some
trees across the front and install
the sprinkler system.
Mr. Smith said he wants to build something
nice, something that would look good~
but if someone has a better use of the
land, he is open for suggestions.
~lr. Greenfield asked Mr. Horvath about
the parking requirement.
Mrs. Nash asked Mr. Smith about drainage.
Þlr. Smith said ,,¡hen they fill this lot
in, they could make it drain an~vay
necessary) they could make it drain
down Hanvood Road.
Mr. Horvath said there is drainage on
Har~od and the parking requirement
will be discussed at the time of platting.
Mr. Smith said he plans to build that
retaining 'vall.
The Chairman called for anyone wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Oliver Boles came fonvard. He said he
represented the buyer. Mr. Boles said
this is a very distressed piece of
property~ and he feels this is the .
best use for the property.
c-e
¡( e
e
(
Page 7
p & Z
October 23, 1980
(
Alice Nunley, 5145 Jennings Drive, came
forward. She said she wasn't sure if she
was for or against this request.
Mrs. Nunley asked if it would be stipulated
that they must build certain things.-
Mr. Horvath said that at the time of the
final plat is submitted, they would have to
submit construction plans and layout.
Mrs. Nunley said what if they said it would
be office space but then decided to build
something else.
Mrs. Nunley said she has a simular situation
on Grapevine Htvy. She said the neighbors do
not like her, either.
Mrs. Nunley said this vacant lot does create
snake and rat problems; the city would be able
to increase their tax revenue, but there is
some flooding. She said the flooding happened
,,,hen they built Grapevine H\vy., but to put
more water into this ditch now might cause
problems. Mrs. Nunley asked if they could re-
route the ditch.
Mr. Greenfield asked Mrs. Nunley if she was
saying she thought it could present a problem.
Mrs. Nunley said she felt it should be re-routed.
Mr. Horvath said if the zoning is changed, then
before the plat isapprovedt our engineer would
go out and make them bring the drainage up to code
Mrs. Nunley said then whe would be in favor of
the approval of this zoning request.
The Chairman called for anyon"e wishing to
speak in opposition to this request to
please come forward.
}lrs. Doyne Bird, 8320 Dude Ct. said they have
lived here 20 some odd years and hoped to stay
20 more years, but they have had to fight many
battles. She said they do have-a flooding
situation. Mrs. Bird said if they were ~o get
a 9 inch rain, there would be serious problems.
PAGE 8
p & Z
October 23, 1980
(-
(
(
(
(
\
Mrs. Bird said there are approximately
39 people who live around here and 38
are against this request, Mrs. Nunley
is the only one for it.
Mrs. Bird said water goes allover
this property. She said when they
built Northeast traIl, it was built
over the creek where the water had to go;
then there's the freeway. She asked
,.·where the 'vater could go.
Mrs. Bird said this man said we shouldn't
have buil t there anyway, but a builder
built the houses then not knowing they
would flood. She showed pictures to the
Cornmission.
Mrs. Bird said her husband would be 65
in ~~rch and they are too old to have
to buy another house.
}~s. Bird said this request would "cause
a greater traffic hazard on Harwood
Road and Grapevine Highway. She said
lots of times when she goes out on
Jennings she has to turn around and
go back.
Mr. Greenfield told }lrs.. Bird the
Commission understands her concerns
about the traffic, drainage~ etc. and
they need to move along and allow
others time;to speak.
Mrs. Bird asked about the parking for
this 4,000 sq. ft. building.
Mr. Greenfield said that is a matter
to be taken up at the time of the
platting of the property; this is a
zoning matter.
Mrs. Bird said about the trees Mr.
Smith wants to plant - that would be a
traffic hazard: She said she wants
to be g the Commission to turn this
request do~m, t11at she doesn't see ,.¡hy
anyone ýl0uld btty this property any·way.
Gene ,Burroughs, 5132 Jennings Drive, came
forward. He said he had lived here
2~ years and said his property is adjé at
to tfiis property, about 175 ft. from his
p~operty line.
P~'\GE 9
p & Z
October 23, 1980
c.e
(e
'-
Ie
\ .
(
(
Mr. Burroughs said he was concerned
about the retainer 'vall, it would have
to be at least 5 ft. He said he had
tried to get the City to do something
about this drainage. Mr. Burroughs
said he had lost about 20 cubic yards
of his yard.
Mr. Burroughs said he doesn't know
about the snakes and rats.
'Mr. Burroughs read a.letter from Cecil
& Gladys ~vright 'vho live at 5140
Jennings Drive and were unable to attend.
The letter stated they were opposed to
this zoning request.
}lr. Burroughs said he 'moved there to
raise his family and plans to live right
there the rest of his life. He said his
house had never been flooded.
Mr. Greenfield asked Mr. Burroughs to
show the Commission where his and the
Wright's property lies.
Mrs. Jerry Cozby, 5125 Jennings Drive,
came forward.
Mrs. Cozby asked if the city has a
master zoning plan. She said she felt
this would be spot zoning.
Mr. Greenfigld said the city does have
a master plan which is in a plan of
revision.
Mrs. Cozby asked if the Commission would
consider this spot zoning.
Mr. Greenfield said they did not.
Mrs. Cozby said they have a very nice
neighborhood, but have approximately
5 lots which could be used for businesses.
Mr. Greenfield asked Mrs. Cozby to
show where her property lies.
Mr. Greenfield asked Mrs. Cozby if her
property had been flooded.
Mrs. Cozby said it had not been flooded.
PAGE 10
p & Z
October 23, 1980
( .
(
\,
('
(
(
Mrs. Audrey Chaffin, 5144 Jennings Drive
came fon~ard. She said she is proud
of her neighborhood and would not like
to have a business there, due to the
traffic.
Mrs. Chaffin said the man previously
had said that no one had offered to
buy this piece of land, but Mrs. Wright
and Mr. Burrough both had tried to
buy it 2 years ago, but they would not
sell.
Mrs. Chaffin said there are several
neighbors who have children. She said
she is against this zoning request.
Mr. Allen Chaffin, 5144 Jennings~ came
forward. He said he mvns lots
13 & 14 directly ,behind this lot in
question and a small portion of lot 15
do~~ close to the center of the creek.
Mr. Chaffin said they definitely have
had. a flooding problem for several
years.
Mr. Chaffin said he was opposed to any
rezoning of this property.
Mr. Chaffin said he would request that
the Commission go out and look this
property over.
Mr. Greenfield said the Commission had
been out and looked this property over.
Gene t~ard:t 5128 Jennings Drive:t came
fOTIvard. She said there is definitely
a flooding problem and also there is a .
traffic problem and this would add to
the problems.
Mrs. Nunley asked if there is a proposed
signal at Harwood Road and Grapevine
Highway.
}lr. Greenfield said there 'vas.
Mrs. Nunley said these people are not
only opposed to businesses, they are
opposed to the duplexes she tried to
build. She said these neighbors have
cars, campers, etc. parked on,Jenning~
so you cannot ~ee around.
(e
(e
.e
~,.
PAGE 11
p & Z
October 23, 1980
I
(
(
Mrs. Nunley said she feels Mr. Smith
is being denied the best use ôf his
property.
Mr. Greenfield said the singalization was
approved last week.
Mark Howe. came fOTIvard. He said he was
with American National Mortgage and wanted
to speak in favor of this request. He
said as far as the use of this property,
it would increase the tax revenue and was
well suited for the proposed use.
Mr. Howe· said in regards to the flooding,
this is their best opportunity to get the
drainage fixed; the City Engineer would
see to it that it is improved. Mr. Howe
said the city would probably be longer
in correcting this than Mr. Smith would be.
J. Dolan Lunsford) 3816 Diamond Loch E.,
came fODvard. He said he is the o~vner
of ~he property. Mr. Lunsford said he
bought the property with the intention
of building a home on it, but when they
went to widen Hanvood Road, 3 ft. was
taken off his side and none off TCJC's
side which made it not large enough.
Mr. Lunsford said he was then assessed
$2)300.00 for curb and gutter.
Mr. Lunsford said the lady was wrong, he
had had this property for sale for 10 years
and had only 2 buyers - both were for
commercial use.
Mr. Horvath said the signals have been
~pproved and the bids let on the signal
lights at Grapevine Highway and Hanvood
Road.
~lrs. Nash asked when they "tvould be
put up.
Mr. Horvath said as soon as possible.
Mr. Marvin Smith said he could appreciate
some of the people's problems, but he
plans to build a professional type .
building. He said if the zoning is
not changed, the neighbors will still
have tneir problems they have had
for years. Mr. Smith said when he goes
in and improves it, it will be an
Page 12
p & Z
October 23, 1980
(-
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
,(
/'
\
\, .
asset to the neighborhood. He said it
would not create a greater traffic problem
and he would correct some of the drainage
problems.
Mr. Smith said he had lived in this area all
his life, he lived here before there was a
city. Mr. Smith said he had been building
in this area for 12 years and request that
he be allowed to build this building.
The Chairman called a 10 minute recess at
8:50 P. M.
The Chairman called the meeting back to order
at 9:05 P. M. with the same members present.
The Chairman closed the public hearing.
}vIr. Bo".¡en said the problem he ,.¡ould have
would be the drainage and Mr. Smith says
the work he will do will correct this problem
and Mr. Bowen said he feels this would help
these people.
}fr. Greenfield said the Commission did not
want to cause a problem.
Mrs. Nash said that }fr. Smith said he could
cause the drainage to flow two or three
different ways-could he do this; he said
there are two ditches or he could drain it
on Harwood. Mrs. Nash said what she wasnt
sure of was if this would all come together
and cause flooding.
Mr. Horvath said the City Engineer would see
to it that it drains properly.
Mr. Greenfield said the CowEission should
decide:on the zoning request.
Mrs. Nash said that several people have
spoken about "Commercial") but she said she
would like to point out that there is a
difference in Commercial zoning and Local
Retail zoning. She said you cannot put
manufacturing or storage in Local Retail.
zoning.
PAGE 13
p & Z
October 23, 1980
(·e
V1Xr~' I . ~ __,.
, (.
,e
I
\,'
, ti 1 -Ll
PZ 80-36
APPROVED
PZ 80-37
PS 80-43
PS 80-43
APPROVED
r u (\., .L-
-
Mr. Greenfield said they want the best
possible use of the land. He said if
the land is to be used for Local Retail
the ordinance requires a fence as a
buffer and the drainage would have
to be taken care of.
Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash
to approve PZ 80-36 as requested. Motion
carried 3-0.
Request of Charles Beane to rezone Lots
18-28, Block 42Bl, Richland Terrace
Addition, from its present classific
of Specific Use-Community Unit Dev.,
opment to a proposed classificat·~ n
of Multiple Family. This pro~ ty
is located on the east side -~ Cloyce
Street, approximately 44" eet south
of Maplewood Drive.
Request of Charles ~- ane for replat of
Lots 18R, 19R, & ltR, Block 42Bl,
Ricnland Terrae' Addition.
this pro. ty is approximately one
block ~ st of the City Hall.
Mr, ~ane said this property is in
%:,;:11 lots for Tm:vn Houses. He
/.. . "said he ~is~es to build quadrop1exes.
Mr. Beane said he needed to replat
. this property into 3 lots so he could
build each one on a separate lot.
The Chairman called for anyone wishing _
to speak in favor of or in opposition
to these requests to please come forward.
There being no one to speak~ the Chairman
closed the public hearing.
Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash
to approve PZ 80-37 as requested.
Motion carried 3-0.
Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Bowen
to approve PS 80-43. Motion carried
3-0.
All1ra_1 Jt I LlI 1. .:t...l 1"1
14 J 1 1 l/føJUJ
11 T a&.- 1
,-
J
"
e
e
e
(
\
'.
/'
\
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENG INEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
October 14, 1980
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North R;chland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, Texas
7ó118
Su'bj ec t :
3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS)
ZON I NG PLJ} f·-RE·V-ηE-~i; ·Pz· ·8·O·_·3~6- .. - .. - - - - -
't·F~-1-2 -fõ-C ~-R~- .-.- - .-. .... - .. - ... · . -
We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that
we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Comnlission and the City Council.
/(2¿k
R~lA/l jc
cc: r~r. Charl es ~~. Wi 11 i ams, Ci ty r/1anager
Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
t~
~.' ' ._,J'"
Þ1.... -., '... ~/'"
~'Q
-
, , ! V'! "Çfl' 'A I ... f\/
j ,/ " '(~....~ :.._", v·./ .Jo'L./\
/__:1 /" _ J )...'ì-
.[.{, C '1..,/1 . ~ J I . ,......."' -----" /
/ r -' "v -
"/, \) /'
..J - ¿r LJ
l!fd~~~,; II /
, ~~
OJ " t1
f)1. ~l;,,3t.
I
PRO-fEST' .t~GAINS"'f ZONING
Cl-lANGE
\\1 I:, 1HE UNDERSIGNEL), protest the chans':; in zonia; in th,.:
Cily~ of ',:\1ofrh !\ichland I-lills. 1\~){as, ttlC 110tice at which is tlereby attactled
tiS E::Xt1ít)it A ane1 !11alie a part hereof. \t'./~~J and c~ach of us fl1rth~r represeilt
that we ar:3all owners of r~;al property il1 said City of North Riclllanci l"lills,
'1"~>X¡lS~ai1(: t\13t "Net tfie undersi;šl1ed, COilStitutc twenty (20)~ percent or
r~ìorE~ of tl1e followii1,~: l~he o\vners, either of the rt.:al property ~Nilllit1 th~~
ar(~a to be rc-zoIl~~~d. or of the real property acljacenr ':vithi!1 two hunC1ret-!
(2!~)O) f;'::l~t or sait~ pr·oposeè revision (i'1 such zoning). ',^!e, and each of us
furtÎli,:.>r reprt~Sèl1t that we protest the change propose(! in said Exhibit f\
e
)
2LraCf1ed hereto as providc(l by tl1:3 laws of the State of -rexas, arlt1 as further
pro·.Ti(!;~~J by rl1è '..arious ordinances of eaid C.ity of North l~ichland I-lìltB.
~I·~.:xas~ anc1 as fllrtI.1~~r pro\lided in th(~ City Counclll\ules of proc;~:(!~Jr'~~ for
b H i ci C it Y 0 fN 0 r t h R i c h la n. Ö ¡-l i 11 s , 1" ex a s . '1~\! (~ , [ h:: un c! ...~. r s i .:.~n t:d I) rot t? s t
.a~~3.ìnst sue}l ("'11~in6e by tliÎS writin-š tt) th~~ City C()ancil of såidC':ity of f'{orth
l;ichlan{j l-iiils, "f'2xas, throllgh (he (~ity · \¡1ana.~t~r or E:ai(~ CiT.Y· \V~~:'t and
l.~~d~.~:~l of us furifH::r rt.:pr~:t)(~nt that \Ve live al the a(1drc~,s se[ ûppositt~,~~.:a(:¡~1
.~
3
," /' , '1
ür Oi.H·/ïal.'~¡~S~Ç~ :~ --.i . . Q ~
2:'~)J~4//1 ;)/ß1Y~2/;- ~n!ìP r.:')c, 5/4t~L~- »/l-
oK ./ f' ~. .m .. ... 4.JeJ) /?/ n/,=> . .v.
~d~ Jf' C~~~I. .5-/</<1 .Td..I?(J;nð.:s ...:2J~.
o.K __., / " .. . úU ..? mS / 3 7,/;, '1µ/M~i4. 0./11/... _,_,_.._
.f"'. '/,. l/ :/ ) ,,/} /', / v ¡
~ vK j
-- (~u5. (:Jj~:J-tJ ":>/3;¿j~~~ ~ .....
çv ... \ ~,¿Ýd h r/ y'~-ð--~
hd~~k¡~ ....JS-/Ar ~.df)~.-
1 ok µt/V.Á;I----'<d--· ~J--.-' JA..../ l.-LI-~ / 0-/ -:Z. s--- W. /. )- . 'j /*-'
- .. {/ .... d_ /'c:/ jL--Z-1.4~-~,N-?L7
~~:L~~ ~. - .
ok
I
.2
¿
f
L oK
.
-
,,; ;~
.~
: ..~ " ': ""..'
;"
If.
~. ~~.
0'; ,
~1--ß -
~. ..j~.'~ .~~...~ ~<""~"
, ...:",....
~-~. ,-
e
G)
. ..... ......-..;.....,. ......i..,~:.r. ... ..... .....~ '., .
-.'. _.-.;...",..,.;..--....,""""...i#
35'
~
''';,
. .
·'"Jfr
, ~~. .;>'," .
~~T ~T UMIRG
œ.AJI(Z, . ~ :... t·, '. .... A:
... ,.~+...
. ~ ~ . . . .
WE. THE UNDERSIGtrlD, P,ro~.t the .ebanp in zomnZ ~ the Cl.ty . of North
Rich~d HlllJl. . _Teza1J. the _d.~ of vb~eh 1.- hereby -at~d .. Exhibit A and
\\ .' '-. "'. '", ... , ' ..- . " I
" - .
~..2de a part hereof.Ve_' aad each of WI førther repre..nt that we are aU cramer.
. .
. '
of real property 1D the tichløc1 Oaks. Add1t1oa in the said City of North Ricl1lanà
Hills, Texas. We the œàraiped protut· apinat 8uch change by thia writing to
the City CoUDd.l of saiel City ,of North R1ch.1Jmd BiUa, Tex.u. tbroDgh the City
. .
Manager of said City. We, a.d each of WI ~~~er repn.ent that we live at the
add~;8i1 set oppoa1ta each of our n-. ..belcw:I,'
~~-~~Q-~ .
It.o Ør:¡t" V '/1h4. ~ &J¿ ~/L ~/ 3 à ~~n ÿ~
.-' - -). /)/ '~- /1 C
'-#1._ .'......'.,'),J "j ./. /1'll..'.¿.L Jf....r1¡..,!-þ ;:' /., '1--/-;. :-.- {.~-'/I 3 '-7 , C(,,(.L/L/¿'[.'¿'~.:' .' ' ~~.._,:/' /v"
, , -.. I ;;, ; I L v L, V<..·'LJ( ,-- - - _,/ .
. ~ V',< ;-, '
/ ~..<Î0l(~ i tvV-. I~xð-v~ S/ £_-u fJl~~ b.0
, ! J \.(/. II I~; ìJ~ · ~ _ U ,
121- . þ;;:L-~ \Na-t:~ ~J2L/ /S"c?'/)'/;:t//y,S )~i).J
/
/
" /. ~/<. -~ -, ~~-.....-=~,:~,,/-;~ /~/'
f) /~ ..r' ~. ....' ( l.,. /' ·G· ;Æ -'" .' .//..,
1/::"_ ~-"'r-:-'~ ./.. :'....
((~<c~ )·r '-',' ~~
ïVJ -'.' 7 ~
,.//i . V/ /1 I). /,j
Lf~ ~-£ /~) (~t~{y~'L
,// /(:..,~ .'::-:::-- 6/
-- ;; -v:!7' ',f.- //7 /t/JW~
3 1I u . fA1f\ _) / )
</ ¿,(..) fj' ¡M4~
~ ' '\
\~~ \c', \ (h . C\
~ ~~_9--;\~,
,,;{ /' ~Ul G? · )'\) 7-'7 /.
~:/, j~ V1c( \" / ! â~
. '-''',.-.J
"--...", , f ' ~
. \ i¡:.r'
/ .,...,.; .
. ("~.... I ...;.." /"J /
. . .-' ;¡; ",~~. -" -:.. , .-'
5' fU7;=- C?_ /:~~E~
1:1 ~ Þí '/,; C:-)· /.1 (''1 C;
,~t' I~~' /.:.:;:/)..J2...-VlLp Uc~/l-~~ C' ..J
"""" f /"'" /I
( c': ¿.., /
) if 77 ÎV':J-- -Î JY 3 8 -¿('vtf/
")" .Ii / /~] ~'1;/
<- i~/)" .- ~YU;¿
"(ì. -0-vL,
(/IfV
~iA.\{!:, ..'
rJ . ..,.....".-- .~... --..
-;.._- ..-~_...
~
.tf
1W
¿
.~
7
._ '.' Ann.R~ .
~-/.~L'4-,-,..//-e------..,... r~--· ç~~
\/ r-", or '~
/' \ \ .)
" - /' .'" - ¡? . ~ ' -', .
d / ~ ~".", ,-/~fé---1,'I.....///L--1t-'¿1. t:.) -5 ~~-,.. ._/
, /J // A
/ / " [/....,
.../? t.;, ". / .,/ . /' "') )
;'. /1.' P/7 .,~G- ./ ).
. .~ '-- .. ,../ r-- >,.~ '---1'
c//
'-
-- / } / j {!
!;J- /, L' 1)~e/~./V1éj-,j /00
&:1 . / Ç\
5' / I [. ~,~ C( /V £j-.r-.
I d
'-/ ,C-~.
-5 \ ( ~ ()Y-~"; 1-) cU---¿ ,
~ - î2
-----/ .~ j(/, .\.J.-.;) 7--z--?-...v.-.r~7 ~ ~
V ~_., ;/r--- /"",-
.,'/
e- 'J . ç( ,-... ,-. ~ '. , yj' --_-C>... ... AJ, \~ " /
.) / ". ' ~ ....,." (' , ..~ ,.. .. ,..7, v-- ~ \.;-,/
C':... ( ..' i -."...._.....___,. _. ·l..-·'
f>""
S/oS ~~ i~ .
¿) /) //
r-L~-2--L ti.:!/t '. JJ--
;139-0 ~~ l:{
2 j d- Ó U-L d-
J~~ -8 ~1 '
S¡°C¡
,>.. :..
. . ' .
,;' '.....I·~. ...~ '~;,f; ..~;,T ,: ~
. .. ~:.~ .. :', ., .. ,,-" -f
.... ........':. .' .
"~" .'.
e
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS~
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE4[ITYOF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TEXAS,
PASSED. APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONfNG COMMISSION' AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13.
1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27~ 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE 'NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: .
//
RESOLVED that òn Case No. PZ 80-36 the followi':ng descri'bed property shall,
be rezònedfromlF-12-0ne'Family··DwellinèJs····,··· ..., , ·to
Loca 1 Reta i 1 . ". . . . , . " ,',
Being Lot15R~ Block 1, Richland Oaks Addition to the City of North Richland
Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as reco'rded in Volume 388-8, Page 80, Deed
Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
This property is located at the southeast corner of Harwood Road and
Grapevine Highway.
e
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd
OCTOBER ,1980.
~
DAY OF
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AN
SEZ~~~ z~c~~~~
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF ,1980.
ATTEST:
MAYOR DICK FARAM
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
e
CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
CITY ATTORNEY
·CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
(
DATE:
/
\,
11-25-80
/~
e
SUBJECT: PZ 80-38 Zoning request from IF-9 to 2F-9
.. "
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: Ron Lusk wishes to build duplexes on this property.
There were 22 property owners within 200 feet of said property that were contacted.
There was a petition submitted with eleven signatures on it who were against this
zoning request.
1
· i
This property is located at the southeast corner of Booth Callwoay Road and Rogan Dr.
e
The Planning. and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request with a
vote of 2-1.
..
If this request is denied, there will be no need to hear PS 80-47 which is the
final plat of this property.
. :--
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial~of zonìng request.
BUDGETED . ITEìý1: YES . NO X
ACCOUNT NU¡\î8ER: N/A
.þ
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e
" .. I
' - "p ~
",..- -~.-. -~"...
e
:( .
.e
PAGE lL~
P & Z
October 23, 1980
(
(
PZ 80-38
Request of Ron Lusk to rezone Tract
IOAl,_ Abstrac t 1606, from its present
classification of IF-9-0ne Family Thvellings
to a proposed classification of 2F-9-Two
Family Dwellings. This property .is loca~ed
at the southeast corner of Booth Calloway
Road and Rogan Drive.
Ron Lusk came fonvard. He said he wants
to build dùplexes on this property.
He showed the Commission pictures of
the neighborhood.
Mr. Lusk said one of the pictures
showed a house that was supposed to be
torn down when the property owner died~
but as yet has not been torn down.
Mr. Lusk said this would be a $600,000.00
investment which he feels would be
an asset to this area.
Mr. Lusk said Southland Corporation that
owns 7-11 stores had lôoked at this
property.
Mr. Lusk said he felt this would be the
highest and best use of this property.
}lr. Luslc sho1:ved the Commission a layout
of the property and ,.]hat they plan to
build.
Mr. Lusk said there would be a sight
baring fence, a stockard fence.
Mr. Greenfield said they would consider
the zoning first, then the platting.
}~. Lusk said he would like rebuttal time.
,The Chairman called for anyone wishing to
speak against this request to please
come for"tyard.
Mrs. L. B. Vaughan, 4317 Ashmore, came
fOTIvard. She said they had lived here
for 18 years and 'tvhen she found out about
this request, she got out and got a
petition signed by 15 neighbors but was
unable to contact the 16th neighòor.
Mrs. Vaughan said all of them do not
want duplexes. She said they have a
quiet neighborhood and want to keep it
that way. She said if this property had
been larger, Mr. Lusk would have put
apartments on it.
PAGE 15
p & Z
October 23, 1980
(-
(
( ..
\
(
(
Mrs. Vaughan presented the petition
to the Commission.
Mrs. Calvert said this would not be
valid because it wasn't turned in
early enough for her to check the
names to be sure they are valid
property owner within 200 ft. of the
property.
Mrs. Vaughan said she came up to the
city hall and they said all she had to
do was bring it tonight.
Mrs* Calvert, said she would check it
and it would be valid for the City
Council if this request is approved.
Mr. Greenfield said they would hold the
petition for the Council.
Carolyn Myres, 4321 Ashmore Drive,
came fOTIvard. She said they live directly
behind this property. She said she and
her.husband bought this home last year
and then he passed away last fall.
Mrs. Myres said she hated to have tran
people at her back yard.
}Iac Waldrip, 7813 Randle, came for"t.Jard.
He said his property joins the property
in question. MI. Waldrip said it is
zoned one family and wants it to stay
one family.
Mr. Greenfield asked Mr. Waldrip to
show where his property is located.
Russell Ortman, 4300 Booth Calloway Road,
came forward. He said he is p~esently
opposed to duplexes.
Ruth Baker, 4304 Booth Calloway Road,
came forward. She, said she is opposed
to duplexes and she does not want rent
property next to her property.
Mr. Lusk said he gave Mrs. Vaughan a
copy of tbe plans and asked her if she
showed it to the neighbors.
Mrs. Vaughan said she wasn't interest( ir
looking at his plans.
Mr. Lusk said he feels this is the
highest and best use for this property.
,I
.~
P.é\GE 16
p & Z
October 23, 1980
I
/A
\. .
The Chairman called for anyone else
wishing to speak to please come forward4IÞ
There being no one~ the Chairman closed
the public hearing.
Mr. Ortman said he wanted to ask if
this property could be sold as residences
instead of rental property.
Mr. Greenfield said the property across
the street is zoned local retail.
Þ!ark Howe. , co-owner of the property in
question, said the economics of the
land prohibits the use of it as
residential; there are ratios involved in
building. He said the chance of a builder
building residential is very doubtful.
Mr. Howe: said the legal technicality
would be none, but the economices would
be.
(e
Mr. Greenfield asked~ if this is approved,
do they plan to rent these or would
they be sold.
Mr. Howe said they would like to sell4IÞ
them as an owner-occupant~ othenvise~
they will rent them.
Mr. Greenfield asked if they~þlan to build
on all the lots or sell some of them.
Mr. Lusk said it is their intention
to build on all of them, but they are
in this business for profit. He said they
will be built to city codes.
l·fy. Howe said they could not ignore
the economics) you cannot guess this.
Þ!r. B:n.¡en said he was sympathetic \.¡ith
the neighbors.
.e
Mr. Horvath said Booth Calloway Road
will be widened and improved but he cannot
give them a date - just in the near future.
tha
Mrs. Nash said Lot 15 does not meet
zoning ordinance requirements.
\ ,,' ..
('
\.
~,.
\
'-
>~ - '.:;..
PAGE 17
p & Z
October 23, 1980
Mr. Lusk asked what the problem was.
Mr. Horvath said it wasn't 9,000 sq. ft.
Mr. Lusk said they could move the lot line.
He said he will be extending a 6" \.¡ater line
and will put in a fire hydrant and this
would change the insurance coverage for
the neighborhood.
Mr. Bowen made a motion to deny PZ 80-38.
Mrs. Nash seconded the motion in order to
get the motion on the floor. The motion
was defeated with a vote of 1-2 with
1wlrs. Nash and Mr. Greenfield voting
against denial.
PZ 80-38
APPROVED
Mrs. Nash made a motion to approve PZ 80-38
Mr. Bowen seconded the motion in order
to get the motion on the floor. The
motion carried 2-1 with Mr. Bowen voting
against.
PS 80-46
Req~est of Ron Lusk for preliminary pIa
Lots 8-15, Bloc~ 8, Richland Heights
Addition.
PS 80-47
Request of Ron Lusk for fina- lat of
llots 8-15) Bloclc 8, Riehl ~ Heights
Addition.
Ernest Hedgecoth, nsulting engineer,
came forward. said they had received
the enginee~ etter and are in full
agreement " th all the comments.
follows:
/; 1 - We 'viII be glad to put the zoning .
on the plat. #2 - We request that the sidE
,; yard for Lot 13 of 15. ft. . fronting on'·Rogal
~ Drive be allowed to remain since the
/ buildings will face Booth Calloway Road.
~. #3 _ The developer agrees to pay his pro
,/ rata share of the existing sanitary sewer.
#4 _ The developer will pay his pro rata
share for the existing water lines in
Booth Calloway Road, $4.00 per lineal
foot, for the frontage on Booth Calloway
Road only. The water services will·be
installed in Rogan Drive at the develo ,I
expense. Therefore, the pro rata costs
should not apply. The City Engineer has
agreed with this conclusion. #5- The
Developer wilJ pay his pro rata cost for
the proposed Booth Calloway Road improve-
ments when they are completed.
.J . 1M _ __ ... .. .... U' _ . ~,~r~.-. "._. .A_. =..."C._..L ..c4!!. .... AI ._,"_.-_ -"'- .' ....-. '-' I.I.--~II' 111' LdJ . ..- .......-<lJ - - U ". .. .....
{ .
\
('
\..
(
ì
e
Date: ' /ð - c:23- ¡O
7.~ 3 ð " . h1 .
TO: CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CASE NO: f2 ~ ()... .3 i
We, the undersigned property owners wi.thin two QIJn(jrAt;\ (:i:QO) ~QoLof the
tract sought to be rezoned, hereby oDJect to the rezoning of the said
property described in the application fo~the following reasons: This
zoning would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience,
co~fort, prosperity or general welfare of the present neighborhood.
~-,
Address: Oat e:
. ~ 7?¿Jc? ~-{IJ!Rh( /,d-?-~¿;
?" / /:7 Q,.. -n /1 /I /ô- Ý- ð' 0
~ ~ . /f -z/ ?áu j'--AgtJ ~ 3/7 M¿ N ~ //. /[ ¡N.
V /3 ?I(Ù¿!~ 7 ð"ð c¡ R 1-~ J7.,f II /ð - ~- 20
I<- ~ g¿JL g .8o;iu.- /,Laoe¡ ~L'X Co-I!fZt.~pe£ /~--. cY~ g-a
4'3 0'; 1\ S ~\ W\ a (l~ ~r'1- l(::) _ ¿_ g~
ok/a~.f}{h~ '7 ýol R tß-~ ~lL. (Ó-~-ýf)
t ~ ' f3 ~ 31 r;, Its; A in t1le Þ r; I ó ~ 8 - ~ 0
~ ---~ ~~ ~5d-1 ~ ¡ß.r¡ /o-f-fû
¿?ÞPf. - iJ~'L/'3/~ Oh-Æ~- f(Q~(¿-~ù
Ìh~./~ 13':2-«/ ~ Nu IO-?-cf'()
~- ~.4l~ ~ </yóo ø~~d~
~-¿íf~ Í·C:L&~Y 78 [if '~7¿¿:¿~t-
e '
/ D ~ ~.. YO
'/
/ ¿; - /0 - ~ Z;
/',< ,.- /" 11 .- ~ ô
<.,:. u
/c ¡} ~
/ø--/~-'Yo
e
e
e
(
\.,
("
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort vVorth-Oallas
October 14, 1980
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76113
Subject: 3-002, CITY Q.[J!Q~lti__~LÇ}ihAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-38
~I F-9 to 2F-9 -------,.~-,----
We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that
vie could adequately locate this property 011 the zoning map should it
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
R I CHARD L-J.
R~~A/ljc ..
c c : r·1r . C h a r 1 e s t~. t~ i 11 i arn s, C i t Y r,1a nag e r
Mr. Gary Caldwell, Building Official
Mr. Allen 8ronstad, Director of Utilities
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367
~---:--- '.
e Date: /ð - ;23- gð
7.- 3 ð f'.;'/1.
TO: CITY COUNCIL
CITY pF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS
CASE NO: fz ç ð... .3 g
We, the un~ersigned property owners w.jJhi.n .;tt'¡Q...h,!nd\^~r1 {2~f~~t_of the
tract sougnt t? be ~ezoned, hereby oEject to the rezoning of the' said
pro~erty descrlbed In the application fOr' the follo\ving reasons: This
ZQ~ln9-L"'lou~d not. be conductive to !he public safety, health, convenience,
CO,:1fOrL, Pi osperlty or general \"Iellare of the present neiahborhood.
. ~
Sign~ture: Address: Dat e:
~~ 7~ð /P-~~
o-J.. ~ ~ /f 7/d/// !~;1rJ .t/ .3 / 7 ¿:¿J/fN tYtL 'JJ ~ /J /? /1 / ¿J - S/ - 2 0
V ß 7/d?ú l---Þ~ 7 g ð? k rgé¿ß.~ }7. Æ 1/. / ð .- ð-'- 20
I) k. __ þlt2L e ¿joj¿ú:- /,L30Cj &c~ CcLf!f!-e)'L'V'c¿--"-d-P~L /ß~ cf/~ g-ð
- , --..,./J .0 r'yJ~ / ~. ~ ... .f?':7 C c· -
~ {/ ..:. // /. ;'. fj \ / / t''!/ /.- '?'l -7 8 I ,) I i /';'l'v',/)L. L p,.. I é -- c./ --- Ö - ()
:;,~::g:!L- 0 ~SL- ~~o~ ~&~\MCIZ~' ~~ lö - ¿-2~
.{
n .f) / t ýJ é.'1 (6 - (( ~ vO
if;~/Oé;:;;;jY¡;;;~ ~::~I ~A~:Þ~ Ib~ð8:£D
µ( -JQµ~---<.il~) )~-j>0 ~:5:--/ a~~/rv~þV il-') /0- f- fû
g.,,¿vf fJ) /fI./-4/~ L/ 'J I~ a<:>--Æ//~~ - f(Q·~Q-L¿ù
Ìhtu<~ /~.-cI_~ tj J;¿ Y MAAA~ ¡()V. I 0 ~cP ~cPÒ
J ;0; I fØ? '7"7 ø, .'"~ It....
r-,',./;/" _ .:/~.,!.. '..:"'/. r;·L,¡.::~ 7 .(/;..~ t~z¡. ;.,~_.
{.... \.. ''Î'" Þ·'· ... ...;A;...L--( < ~r/ -~~.Þ__
j ,~~ /.?" ;'",-. 'J
,,--. I ,r , v l' J (1 ."
..... Î. - ~ ..~ ~ . - -.......-.-
/",. " , . --:;- . J _, -r .../- ,'-.".;' ""I. ...., /'-'" .
.~ . '_ , __ __ __ ;' '": _ ) ~' ,.,' /~"/'_....~...,,r
, f' - '--""" L.- '-"" - ,..., ,-
I ... -)
/' / .,' / ;:" .
I -,. ¡ y: I ,., -!·L·/ ....,:.,.
J. , .....,--. 7"""-.--f.' -( /7 ).. ".. -I ..~f ),.,./ .,/
r! ....." Ió) (, \,....,' t '- ~~~'. ~-
Gr" :' '.... . E
.1 cÇ' 7/f
'I, -/ hJ~li. - ) ¡.At CJv'v~L-
C,/iC __' ¡ v-{) , II
.
.- ."(1 -~ l,1 ·t1
-r;3 <5 \...~ ("l.'.JG':,--G/{. ~..!·te~,,:~~
'-/" ~~ r c~ .~ -./ ./ /) ~
() L' I /t ~"~ .1'./,.[, // ;CL:/¿· .
. ~/') . -- . ...... "
7J~ (1.( /\./11'-1 1'.i £ Þ ,( -
" ..".) -. ..- AV J( )(1
)-¡ J ., U/X~/v,~{;,~~ ¡V ~
/i <:: - J:".. .Ç;'-O
. - . (/ -)
/1/ --- /0 .- 'J {/
/, --: - "~ - £ ()
,., t,.., I....
/ b--I )}.-- YD
t·
þ ..
(
@
e
PROPERTY O~\lNERS \·JITHIN 200 FEET OF PZ 80-38
Lynncrest Addition
Block A
Lot 1 Lindell R. f'¡1cGu -i re
II 2 Shirley Beth Early Lynn
.. 3 . ~1 i 11 i a Tl1 ~1. ~J est
II 4 Rudolph N. Raya 1
.. 5 James r~1. Brown
6 J. E. \~J hit b ec k
12 William N. Wardlow
13 J . E. v!hitbeck
14 r,1a rv i n A. B ro'tln
15 Gl adys Tuckey"'
16 Patrick H. Stevens
17 c. Y. Canady, Jr.
18 Joe L. Hernandez
Richland Heights Addition
Block 8
Lot 1 Don R. Va ndever'
.. 2 Pa t r~a rrs
II 3 fi1a cR. Hal d rip
II 4 Sallie ß. Carter
e It 5 ,John E. Di nSITIOre
II 6 Joe E. Baker
.. 7 LavJrence B. Vaughn
" 8 Lawrence E. Myres
Abstract 1606
Tract lOA4A Russell Ortman
II 9V Helen Catherine Calloway
.
7800 Arnold Terrace 76118
7804 II II II
7808 .. II II
7812 II II II
7816 II II It
7820 It II If
7825 Rogan Drive n
7820 At"'nold Terrace II
7817 Rogan Drive IS
7813 II u ..
7809 II II II
7805 II II II
7801 II II It
4309 AshIT10re Dr"i ve u
4313 &I .. 11
7813. Randl e Road II
7809 11 It ..
7805 ~ I II Ii
4304 Booth Calloway Road "
4317 Ashrnore Drive It
4321 .. II It
4300 Booth Ca 11 o\'Jay Road u
3912 Golden Oaks 76117
ORDINANCE NO. ì\60
/3
e
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ,ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS~.
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONfNG COMMISSION'AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HrLLS~ NOVEMBER 13,
1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27~ 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RrC~LANO HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that òn Case No. PZ80-38
be rezoned from 1F~9
2F~9
the fo 11 owtng descri' bed property sha 11
. , ,,',' . , " '.., . ,to
A tract of land out of the W.W. Wallace Survey, Abstract No. 1606, situated in
Tarrant County, Texas, being a portion of Block 8, Richland Heights,' to the
City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as shown on plat of record
in Vol. 4849 P. 864, deed records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin, the northwest corner of Lot 6, Block 8, in said,
Richland Heights, said pin being also in the present east right-of-way line of
Booth-Calloway Road;
--
THENCE; North, along said east right-of-way line of Booth-Calloway Road
208.7 feet to an iron pin, the intersection of said east right-of-way with
the south right-of-way with the south right-of-way, line of Rogan Drive .
o .
THENCE; N 89 46'E, along said south right-of-way line of Rogan Drive,
401.5 feet', to an iron pin the northwest corner of Lot 8, Block 8, in said
Richland Heights,
THENCE; South, 209.1 feet to a fence post for corner, the northeast 'corner
of Lot 3, Block 8, in said Richland Heights
THENCE:' S 890 49' W 401.5 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing
1.926 acres of land.
e
e
~ :
e
e
,P-ag~ 2
\ .
This property ,is located ,at the southeast corner of B09thCa]lowa~ RORd
and Rogan Drive. .
APPROVED
October
BY THE PLANNING AND. ZONING COMMISSION THIS
.1980.
'23. rd
DA V OF
~,~~. '.
C~IRMAN. PLAN~ING ANp fyIllG CœtlISSION
L-;r~ ~ .. ~ ~ C--;;n , /J
t7 t7 / ~ tJ-~ . V¡~ . P'( ¿;;~~
SECRETARY p(J{ ," ING AND ZONING COMMISSION J
, BE IT ORDAINED 'BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS ACTING
IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.PZ 80-38 IS
HEREBY' REZONED, " , ,
THIS' . DAY OF , 1979.
MAYOR DICK FARAH ,
CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND'HILLS:
ATTEST: .
CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE
CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS "
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND lEGALITY
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS
/
....~
.
i·
.
. .
.
D#~-rE :
11-25-80
/f
SUBJECT: PS 80-47 Final Plat of L6ts 9-14, Block 8, Richland Heights Addi"tion
DEP ARTr'lENT: Pl ann; n,g and Zon; ng Department
BACKGROUND: This is the final plat of property in PI 80-38. Mr. ItJsk wishps to
bui 1 d' dupl exes on thi s property. He has met all the Enqi neerJ s cormnents. He has
agreed to pay the pro rata cost and has already siqned a covenant for the future
street impròvement on Booth Calloway Road. There was a lot that did not meet the
size requirement that f~ced Booth Calloway Road so instead of havinq 3 lots facinq
Booth Calloway Road, he will just have 2.
1.
_ t ,
Thè P'lanning and: Zoning Comrnis.sion recoolmended 'approvall._
, :--
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
BUDGETED . ITEf·1: YES . r\IO X
ACCOUr·rr ~IUi/18 ER: N/A
.þ
~-~---~---~----------------~----------~---------~-----~--~~---------~-------~-~
o..r-*" ~;.._~..- ,
(
(
/-e
\
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING CO~1~"1ISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAtlD HILLS ~ TEXAS,
NOVEMBER 20, 1980
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the
Chairman, Carl Greenfield, at 7:40 P.t1.
ROLL CALL
Ca~JpG'reenfi e 1 d
LPt4ârjori e Nash
~//? Don Bowen
~;:f';:,v -
~.,
ABSENT: /~~~'
~J-r~''''
_~-:<t''';
PRESENT:
CHA I Rt¡lAN
SECRETARY
t1Et'1BER
Ronni e Ne\vman
C1TY' STAFF PRESENT:
"~~<CITY r1ANAGER
~~/'> ASST. C ITV r~ANAGER
/~.-;" ' P & Z COORDINATOR
~r-:'<·
~~~
CONSI~RATfO;~ OF THE rUNUTES
. /æctOBER 23 ~ 1980 .
~ /" . NEt-J BUSINESS
t,
Chuck ~Ji 11 i ams
Dennis Horvath
\' anda . Ca 1 vert
CGUN C I Lt1AN
Bob Brady
Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Bowen, to
approve the mi nutes as \~ri tten. r10ti on
carried 3-0..
À.
L ,
"~
I"
u'1 1 n ~"...,
PS 80-47
Request of Ron Lusk for final plat of Lots
8-14) Richland Heights Addition.
Ernest Hedgcoth came forward to represent
Mr. Lusk in his request.
r·1r. Hedgcoth said he had made the necessary
corrections. He said the request had been
postponed due to the square footage of a lot.
t1r. Hedgcoth said he made two lots instead
of three fac"ing Booth Calloway Road which
are 12,000 sq. ft. lots now.
~1r. Hedgcoth stated he had recei ved the Ci ty
Engineer's letters of October 15th and
November 11th, and they agree to all the comments.
Mr. Greenfield said he understands that Mr. lusk
has a 1 ready signed a convenant \'iith the city
for improvements on Booth Calloway Road.
e
Mr. Hedgcoth said that was correct.
Mr. Hedgcoth stated that on item #2, he had
moved the building line to 25 feet as requested;
e
e
i. (
e
{ (
\ \.
Request of Cross Roads Dev. Co. for finq
of Blocks 2R, 5, & 6, Snow Heights No'" Addn.
Delbert Stembridge, Consulting E~eer, came
forward to represent Cross Ro~ Dev. Co. in
their requests. .~
fl. ,~...
.~:./
Hr. Stembridge stated,;this vias part of a 103
acre tract at Rufe~~now and Loop 820.
~?'
Hr. Stembridg~~id he \'Jasn't able to submit
the construøtion plans at this time, but he
is workiß~closelY with Knowlton, English,
and FtøWers on the drainage for Rufe Snow.
~!~~embridge stated they have no objections
~~o the pro rata, and they will be installing
7"/" the se'lJer themselves.
¿7' .
¿of
/' Mr. BO\'len asked t1r. Stembridge if he VJas a....Jare
./..~ .
~~ of the additional easements the utility companies
~ had requested.
//
/:/
¿f"
///
~/
,. ~
Page 2
p & Z ~'i nutes
November 20, 1980
PS 80-47
APPROVED
PS 80-51
PS 80-52
(
\.
(
he said he had placed the zoning on the plat,
agreed to pay the pro rata, and signed a
covenant for the street improvement.
The Chairman called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of or in opposition to this
request to please corne forward.
There being no one wishing to speak regarding
this request, the Chairman closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to
approve PS 80-47 subject to the Engineer's
comments. Motion carried 3-0.
Request of CrosS Roads Dev. Co. for pre1iminary
plat of Blocks 2R~ 5, & 6~ SnO\ooJ Heights North ädn.
t1r. S tembri dge sa i d he vIa s a\'la re of i t and he
\..¡ould talk with the utility companies and will
satisfy them.
The Chairman called for anyone wishing to speak
in favor of or in opposition to these requests'
to please come forward.
-
L.~'!,,-~'''''·_-- -~..,..-. ._...._._.~-".._,-:;;;.---_. .........--- ..-.. . ~- -
'j ,,',..:.~-'" ¡...~_#.
PAGE 17
p & Z
October 23, 1980
!
\.
(·e
Mr. H6rvath said it
Mr. Lusk asked what the problem
ft.
Mr. Lusk said they CQ move the lot line.
He said he ,,,ill b ", x tend ing a 6 It \Va ter 1 ine
and ,,,ill put -, a fire !1ydrant and this
'tvQuld cha - the insurance coverage for
the n~~ orhood.
~
~~. Bowen made a motion to deny PZ 80-38.
'~Mrs. Nash seconded the motion in order to
get the motion on the floor. The motion
was defeated with a vote of 1-2 with
Mrs. Nash and Mr. Greenfield voting
against denial.
Mrs. Nash made a motion to approve PZ 80-38.
Mr. Bowen seconded the motion in order
to get the motion on the floor. The
motion carried 2-1 ,,,i th }ir. Bowen voting
against.
PS 80-46 Req~est of Ron Lusk for preliminary plat
Lots 8-15, Block 8, Richland Heights
e Addition.
(
PS 80-47 Request of Ron Lusk for final plat of
Lots 8-15, Block 8> Richland Heigllts
Addition.
(e
Ernest Hedgecoth~ consulting engineer,
came forward,. He said they had received
the engineers letter and are in full
agreement with all the comments.
They are as follows:
#1 - We will be glad to put the zoning
on the plat. #2 - We request that the side
yard for Lot 13 of 15 ft. fronting on~Rogan
Drive be allowed to remain since the
buildings will face Booth Calloway Road.
113 - Tne developer agrees to pay his pro
rata share of the existing sanitary sewer.
#4 - The developer will pay his pro rata
share for the existing water lines in
Booth Calloway Road, $4.00 per lineal
foot, for the frontage on Booth Calloway
Road only. The water services wiJ.l' -be
installed in Rogan Drive at the developer's
expense. Therefore, the pro rata costs
should not apply. The City Engineer has
agreed with this conclusion. #5- The
Developer will pay his pro rata cost for
the proposed Booth Callo\.Jay Road improve-
ments when they are completed.
PAGE 18
p & Z
Oc tober 23, 1980
( .
,..
\.
PS 80-46
APPROVED
(
\.
(
\
Mr. Bowen said they still have to
consi~er the problem with Lot 15.
Mr. Greenfield asked Mr. Horva'th
about the 15 and 25 ft. set backs.
Mr. Horvath said the Commission could
either grant the 15 ft. they are
requesting or reqùire them to go with
the 25 ft. as is stipulated in the
ordinance.
Mr. Greenfield asked Mr. Lusk how they
plan to comply "tvith the ordinance
requirement for lot size on lot 15.
Mr. Lusk said if the plat is approve~
he could go before the Zoning Board
of Adjust~ents for a variance or he
could possibly try to buy more land.
Mr. Hedgcoth said they could have had
all the lots 69~ ft. wide~ but they just
made the one 68.33 ft.
Mr. Greenfield said then they would have
to ask for a variance on all 3 lots.
Mr. Lusk asked the COIT~ission to approve
the plat subject to them correcting the
problems on lots 13) 14, & 15.
}Ir. Greenfield aske d Mr. Horvath how he
felt about this.
Mr. Horvath said they could either deny the
plat or postpone it until they can come
in with the problem corrected.
Mr. Horvath said for the development of'
Booth Calloway Road) they have agreed
to grant the right-of-way needed~ they
donated 25,ft. to the city.
Mrs. Calvert said the Co~~ission could
approve the preliminary plat subject to
the engineer's cornmen'ts and postpone the
final plat until the corrections are made.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 80-46 subject to the engineer's comments
and the lot sizes öf lots 13) 14 & 15
being worked out on the final plat. M~ ·
Nash seconded the motion. Motion carried
3-0.
I' « -. . ...1'....
PAGE 19
p & Z
October 23, 1980
I
\
(oe
PS 80-47
POSTPONED
}Ir. Bo\.¡en made the motion to postpone
PS 80-47 until such time the problems
of the lot sizes of lots 13, 14 & 15
can be worked out. This motion was
seconded by Mrs. Nash. The motion
carried 3-0.
PS 80-49
Request of Clifford
Tract 1A4, Abstract 1399, from its
classification of Agriculture to a
proposed classification of IF-9-0 h
Family D\.¡ellings. This proper," is Ioea ted
on the south side of Bursey A"d, approx-
imately 454 feet \~est of Do.. j las Lane.
Request of Clifford pea~ for preliminary
plat of lots 1 and 2,~ock I, Pearson
Addition. .~
/:
Request of Clif~d Pearson for final
plat of lots ~jãnd 2, Block 1, Pearson
Addition. /' .
Mr. ·Del~øft Stembridge, consulting engineer,
came f.9~;.¡ard to represent Mr. Pearson.
He sJffd Mr. Pearson has owned this property
f~~~several years. Mr. Stembridge said
tW. Pearson has moved and built him a
/fhouse and has decided he has enough room
¿.{&¡" on the \'vest side of the property for two
¿5:?" lots for his children. l1r. Stembridge s,aid
~~y in order for Mr. Pearson to get building
/~~ permits for :his children's houses, he had
~f to zone and plat the property.
//
/
/
PZ 80-39
PS 80-48
,e
(
Mr. Stembridge said they had received the
engineer's comments and they take no
exception except to #4 regarding showing
a preliminary plat of the entire property
that Mr. Pearson owns. }lr. Stembridge
said Mr. Pearson does not plan to develop
any of the property but the two lots;
he does not plan to put any roads in.
e
Mr. Stembridge said #7 of the engineer's
letter - they are only subdividing two
tracts of land and keeping the 3rd
tract.
(
Mr. Stembridge said that Mr. Pearson has no
objection to paying the pro rata, but
he would like to sign a covenant to pay
when the improvements are done on Bursey
Road.
.. ,~
f"',
'r'· v' , .')'
r:~ 1.) '----/
~)- \jJ
,þJY~
C:"' T ,., 8 '''0
. ¡oJ . t.. -Cf
6( .77
A
~.rJ,
. .
3 . C: C1
4_
.
COVENANT TO DISCHARGE LIEN
I, RON LUSK, covenant and agree that I will pay to the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, upon completion of improvements to Booth Calloway Road to be performed
by said City, the sum of FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY-ONE AND 75/100 ($521.75), in respect
of a paving assessment lien existing against the following described property, which is also
known as Tract lOi\-1 in Abstract 1606, W. "'it'!. WALLACE SURVEY:
BEING all of that certain tract situated about eight (8) miles from
the County Courthouse and being out of the ~VlVI. lV. \VALLACE
SURVEY, Patent #363, Volume 12, Abstract #1606, more partic-
ularly described by metes and bounds as follo\vs:
BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of that certain 48.0 acre
tract which is described in a Deed of Trust executed by John P.
Hunter to \Vrn. Fay Kingsbury on IVlay 20th, 1947 and recorded in
Volume 684, Page ll4, Deed of Trust Records of Tarrant County,
Texas;
THENCE East 417.42 feet \vith the North line of said Hunter 48.1
acre tract to corner in said line;
THENCE South 208.71 feet, parallel with the \Vest line of said
Hunter tract to corner;
tit
THENCE North 208.71 feet \vith said 'Vest line of said Hunter tract
to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing two (2) acres of land,
more or less, and being the same land conveyeà by Warranty Deed
dated January 12th, 1948 executed by John P. Hunter, a single man,
to George W. Wright and wife, Florence J. Wright, recorded in
Volume 1970, Page 166, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas
SUBJECT TO any full and final acquisition by me of good and marketable title to said
property, the obligation to purchase said property being made subject to rezoning of the
property to pel'mit the construction of duplexes thereon, by contract of sale dated August
20, 1980. 1Í<
EXECUTED this Æ day of October, 1980.
f~
RON LUSK ~ -',
a .... ~
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
§
§
.. ....':" ~ 1
" ...',.,
.-
" .
,-.
e
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day. personally apþeare.~.RON A:... USK,
known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing' instrument, and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes al}d.consideration tfierein
expres~~~~ . . ,....fit" .~.
,gi\$~UÌ'tDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFIÇE, this II ~ day;..of October, 1980.
~".-. \ ~\ ì )--~'\'~'1,."" ,. . ..,. / '" . /
.·::N):~f'\;}/:;<·~~~~t}\· ":<:.~.,.. tk ~ L . &~ ~
.- -~~ J:' . -) '~:~2
. ~.. {\~::.¿ :s
~ ::)i:~<'{ . '. .. ,
\r~~:j:~1~r~~:{~~ir~~;é¿;
Notary Public in Tarrant OU~ ty and
for the State of Texas I
rv'Iy com mission expires: ~,.,!-\..\.
VOL 702O?AGE949
(,.
(
ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers
e
PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING
November 19, 1980
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop· 820
P. O. Box 13305
North Richland Hills, Texas' 76118
Attention: Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Commission
Ref: Revised Final Plat of Lots 9 through 14, Block 8
Richland Heights Addition
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
This will acknowledge receipt of your November 12 letter
furnishing the engineerts comments for the above project.
e
We have reviewed the engineer's comments and make the
following in accordance with the item numbers in the
November 12 letter.
1. The developer agrees to pay the pro rata
cost for the sewer line in Booth Calloway
Road as outlined ·in the October 15 letter
from the engineer.
2. The developer has signed a covenant cov-
ering the street assessment requirements
for Booth Calloway Road.
If there are additional requirements or information that
you need, please contact me at 625-5504.
Sincerely yours,
? /~ <-:2/ ~
/ '?/bL4:YLßL?0ê6-:. ^--- ,/
Ernest Hedgcoth'
EH/ch
cc: Ron Lusk
e
235 Livestock Exchange Building · 131 East Exchange Avenue · Fort Worth, Texas 76106 . 817-625..5504
(
'.
e
City of ~rth Richland Hills, Texas
3d1\¿!
~-~--- .~
i ~
j/ \ 1/'\
VI
V
TO:
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 18, 1980
DUM 0021-80
FROM:
Allen Bronstad
Director of Utilities
SUBJECT:
Pro-rata of Water & Sewer
PS 80-47, Lots 8-15, Block 8,
Richland Heights Addition
The developer will be required to pay his pro-rata share of the
existing sewer lines in Booth Calloway Road and Rogan Drive.
The pro-rata at $4.00 linear. foot for a total distance of 735 feet
or a total cost for sewer of $2,940.00.
--
The developer will be required to pay his pro-rata share of the
16-inch water line in Booth Calloway. The pro-rata at $4.00 a
linear foot for a distance of 208.7 feet or a total cost for water
of $834.80.
The total cost of water and sewer pro-rata is $3,774.80.
e
(817) 281·0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLANO HillS, TEXAS 76118
I
I
"
e
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
November 11, 1980
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-825, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RICHLAND HEIGHTS ADON., LOTS 9-14,
BLOCK 8, REVISED FINAL PLAT, PS 80-47
We have reviewed the captioned materials for the subject subdivision
and offer the following comments:
e
1. We would remind you of our comments concerning water and sewer pro
rata in our letter of October 15, 1980. Pro rata would be required
on the existing water and sewer lines in Booth Calloway Road, but
not Rogan Drive since the Developler will be required to install a
new 6-inch water line in Rogan to serve this development rather
than use the existing 2-inch line.
2. We would also remind you of our comments concerning street assess-
ment requirements on Booth Calloway Road.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
,~
P.E.
RL~A/l jc
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad; Director of Utilities
Mr. J.M. Madera, Director of Public Works
e
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
e
e
e
/
~
"
ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers
PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING
October 21, 1980
Ms. Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Department
City of North Rich1and Hills
P. O. Box 13305
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
Subject: 3-825, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
LOTS 9-15, BLOCK 8, RICHLAND HEIGHTS
ADDITION, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT,
PS 80-46,47
Dear Ms. Calvert:
I have reviewed the October 15th Engineering comments con-
cerning the subject subdivision. The following comments
are numbered in accordance with the Engineer's letter of
October 15th:
1. We will furnish the proposed zoning (2F-9) on
the final plat for Council approval.
2. We request that the side yard for Lot 13 of IS',
fronting Rogan Drive, be allowed to remain sinçe
the bUildings will face Booth Calloway Road.
3. The Developer will pay his pro rata share of the
existing sanitary sewer lines as proposed in the
Engineer1s letter.
4. The Developer will pay his pro rata share for the
existing water lines in Booth Calloway Road, $4.00
per lineal foot, for the frontage on Booth Calloway
only. The water services will be installed in Rogan
Drive at the Devèloper's expense. Therefore, the
pro rata costs should not apply. Mr. Richard Albin,
City Engineer, has agreed with this conclusion.
235 Livestock Exchange Building · 131 East Exchange Avenue . Fort Worth, Texas 76106 . 817-625-5504
e
e
e
. I
~
(
(
\,
Calvert, Wanda
-2-
October 21, 1980
5. The Developer will pay his pro rata cost for the
proposed Booth Calloway Road improvements when
the improvements are completed.
Sincerely yours,
I'
w~~
Ernest Hedgcoth, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
EH/mnc
cc: Richard W. Albin, P.E., City Engineer
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
Mr. J. M. Madera, Director of Public Works
Mr. Ron Lusk
/
{
"
(
e
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort vVorth-Oallas
October 15, 1980--
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-825, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
LOTS 9-15, BLOCK 8, RICHLAND HEIGHTS
ADDITION, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT, PS 80-4G,47
e
We have reviewed the Preliminary and Final Plat for the subject subdivision
and offer the following comments:
1. We would request that the proposed zoning (2F-9) be shown on the
final plat before fil ing to record, if approved by the Council.
2. We would suggest that the proposed IS-foot building lot line on
the north side of lot 13, which fronts on Rogan Drive, be in-
creased to 25 feet to match lots 9 through 12.
3. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the
existing sanitary Seyler lines which will service this development
in Booth Calloway Road, Rogan Drive and along the east property line.
We estimate pro rata at $4.00 per lineal foot for a total distnace
of 735 feet.
4. The Developer should also b~ required to pay his pro rata share of
the existing water lines in Booth Callow~ Road and Rogan Drive
which will service this development. We estimate pro rata at $4.00
per lineal foot for a total distance of 610.2 lineal feet.
5. The Developer should be required to pay his assessment for the pro-
posed improvements on Booth Calloway Road in accordance with the
provisions of the applicable Assessment Ordinance.
e
~VJ, ø~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
R~1 AI 1 j c
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
Mr. J.M. Madera, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367
,,--
- :...-'"
(
DATE:
11-25-80
/~
e
SUBJECT:
PZ 80-41 Zoning request-from Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific Use-
Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.
DEP ARTf"IENT: Pl ann; ng and Zoni ng Department
BACK~ROUND: Pizza Hut· of North Texas is request this Specific Use Permit to be
allowed to sell alcoholic beverages with their food.- They were turned down in 1978
~
for the same request. At that time, there were several. neighbors who contested it.
, ¡
. ,
This time there was no one to speak against this request.
There were 8 property owners notified who are within 200 feet of said property.
IThis·property is located at 7901 Grapevine Highway.
4IÞ The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request.
..
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial of zo~ing request.
BUDGETED I TEr71: YES . NO X
ACCOUNT NUi18ER: N/A
.þ
----~----------------------~-----------~---~-------~~-~---~-~~---~-----~----~--
e
i· .
i
Page 5
P &. Z t/1i nutes
November 20) 1980
(.
~
\'-
(
J'lII''{ T n"'!i¥,W¡ii'~~~""'~.~,III-I. .~~,40--,~,""""A."~I7 "¡I ,'... 'f>~~.,~ 'T~'.
e
(
,-;",)-';' ."
/-'/;;:: f
,,~;'/
,,::.,.::<-,.
,{Y
/~:.,
,.:,.,7
/',((..
"~/
.,f/'
. -~'F"
.~~;PS 80-54
/APPROVED
,.;N
¿.
-"
,~
/..
.J · .
e
~.,....~~~~, ,,~
PZ 80-41
f/ir. S\vift said the 62 ft. is large enough.
f!Îr. Horvath asked about the contour lines
,.r!
f'1r. S\~/i ft sa i d he \~Ji 11 hå ve a prof; 1 e.,/,7 tudy
made and will fix accordingly.
f-1r. S\'Ji ft sa i d that on the rev,.i ·'ed plan ~ he
changed the se\-¡er 1 i ne to 1 O~:6i' nches.
r:/
,?
nrs. Calvet't told the COfl1mission that if they
approve this request),i"E'fí'ey should make it
subject to addition~J7Engineerts comments
regarding this re~ised preliminary plat.
.....¡"
'," ",,"
r~r. Horva th a s.·ked t'1r. S\vi ft i f he \'Jas alva re
of the addi ti:Onal easements that ~'ere requested
by the ut,i-~'T~i ty compani es.
.' ,.
.:,/
.?
f·lr. ~y¡fft sa i d he \'/as. He sa i d they V/OU 1 d
ag(eê to all except the one next to the rail-
tÖ~d. He said the Federal Railroad ~'/i11 not
,~;â 11 ow an easement nex t to the ra il road. rk.
,):/ S~'IÍ ft sa i d he \'Joul d \'iOrk ~'IÍ th the uti 1 ity
/;/,~:f' compani es to sati sfy therTl.
..¡"j'
,;:>,-
The Chairman called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of or in opposition to this
r~equest to please come for\'/ard.
There being no one wishing to speak regarding
this request, the Chairman closed the public
hearing.
t1r. BO'den moved, seconded by ~·1rs. Nash, to
approve PS 80-54 subject to the additional
utility easements being worked out and subject
to the Engineer's comments now and any
additional Engineerls comments on the revised
preliminary plat. The rnotion carried 3-0.
'~~~,./I'.,~
.' ..~--.~~- ~--".~ " ....... ØI .....~ ~,.. 't .¡J:Þ.., _;, -v: ., ",..,.....OC"~ .~ ~I... ,J.. J:
-It¡( ~_II'M~ 'IU.l
1 l'IIJIf'
Request of Pizza Hut of North Texas to rezone
Lot 1, Block 25, Clearview Addition, from its
present classification of Local Retail to a
proposed classification of Local Retail-Specific
Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.
This property is located at 7901 Grapevine Hwy.
Thomas Anagnostis came forward to represent
Pizza Hut and Gerald Anderson Beverage Company
in their request.
".
Page 6
P E{ Z fv1i nutes
November 20, 1980
(
\.,...
(
tÎr. Anagnosti s sai d thi s is the second time
they have made this request. He said they
were denied the request in 1978.
Mr. Anagnostis said he felt it was unfair
to not be allowed to serve alcoholic beverages
with their fòod. He said that no one would
be a 11 O\'led to 1 eave the premi ses vii th an
alcoholic beverage.
Mr. Anagnostis said it would only be 5% of
the net sales and he felt they should be
allowed to sell alcholic beverages as the
others in the area have. Hè said he had
made a study of the restaurants in the area
that have been allowed to sell alcoholic
beverages with their food; they are Steak & Ale~
Jo Beels~ Dos Gringos, Red Lobster, Bennigans~
Dos Vecinos, and Jamie's, not taking into
consideration the places that sell beer for
off-premises consumption.
The Chairman called for anyone vlÌshing to
speak in favor of or in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
/
\.
There being no one wishing to speak regarding
this request~ the Chairman closed the public
hearing.
PI 80-41
APPROVED
Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to
approve PI 80-41 as requested. Motion carried
3-0.
""'_,' . u >.".~."......"_..._..""'o.r.=c_è,>,-=-",,,,"~,>,",,"~r.D'_"""'"''"''·'''~'''''~=''*C»~='''=='==''''~=.=.-=--"-~"""'~ -
PI 80-42
Request of Dr. James Waggener to rezone Tract
170 and a portion of 16B, Abstract 1605 : om
its present classification of IF-7 ~
proposed classification of L~ç~~tail.
This property is located ,prY'"'t'he east side of
Davis Blvd., one block'šõuth of Emerald Hills
,r
\ \J a y . "..-r~~..r:~
.....,-t...r#'·,.#'...
BeriL_.-Stê\;art came fonlard to represent Dr.
)!aggener and the YHCA in thei r request. He
/,..--/ said they \>!anted to build a one story, 1600
,/'- sq. ft. doctor's clinic. t1r. Stev¡art said
this piece of land has a 125 ft. frontage
on Davis Blvd.
.-" .:,,,,- ...../...'
/'
.....'-',....,.."'..f
~/-~
/",;:/ '
~~
.-L..~,<~:C.~~_..-._. ,-,. .. .. .'"
~.,......_" "",~=_. ...~ ~.u:.l~~..'õ'..'.'!,~!'.:~~~....,..~ë.:~..,.,-:,,~-5!o,..-¡¡:."""'~1"V'~~~=''''"..-a~...-.- ....~
The Chairman called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of or in opposition to this
request to please come forward 0
",-' . -........ .....
e
e
e
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
November 11, 1980
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-41
LR TO LR SU ALCH.
We have received the field notes for the subject zoning case for our
review from the Oeveloperls Engineer and find that we could adequately
locate this property on the zoning map should it be passed by both the
Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
R\~A/l jc
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City 'Manager
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021· 817/283-621'· METRO/267-3367
ORDINANCE NO.~\9"
/¿,
e
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN .ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS~
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179) ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
PASSEDt APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONfNG COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13,
1967, AS AMENDED JANUARY 27~ 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RrCHlAND HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PI 80-41 the following described property shall
be rezoned from Local Retail . ,', ., ,',' '\" . . to
Local Retail-Specific Use-Sale of AlcoholicBev~rage~ tDP~~iaH tand
be non-transferable.
BEING Lot 1, Block 25, Clearview Addition, to the City of North Richland Hills
as recorded in Volume 388-199, Page 66, Deed Records, Tarrant County,. Texas.
This property is located at 7901 Grapevine Highway.
e
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 20th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1980.
Cf'; A 0 µ, ML( fj ~'''. A ;.l~P I
w v,-, I ~Lt~" "'''r -- v............
<-._____./) ~-""" _ (~) (~:Rr::N .~ANNING. AND ÈJNING COMMISSION
/) // 7 /...' . ~~ .'..";: ;--,""J \ ,/ 1 .-:/ / ~-..-7 ,.",/ .~
(/ ~,/ þ ~>// ~, .' --- c '~:.- '-- ¡ __ v { t..- ~ ...,.;:....1./ L---
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAIND HILLS ACTING
IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PI 80-41 IS
HEREBY REZONED
THIS DAY OF ,1980.
t1A YOR DICK F ARAt~
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY, JEANETTE MOORE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
e
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
J ~.-
. --..........
DATE: 11-25-80
(
/1
e
SUBJECT:
PI 80-42 Zoninq request from IF-7 to I nr~l Retail
. ..
DEPARTiv1ENT:
Planni~g and ,Zoning Department
BACKGROUND: This property is presently owned by tbp Y~rA and has a 125 foot
frontage on Davis Blvd.~ and they wish to build a doctor's clinic on this property-
i
. ~
This property is located on the east side of na~j~ Rlvrl, one block south of
Emerald Hills Way.,·
There were 19 letters sent to property ~wners within 200 feet of ~~id prQ~Rrty.
Th~r~ was no one-who contested this request.
4IÞ The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request.
,.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of zoning request.
. -
BUDGETED ITEr~l:
YES
. NO
x
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-~
Page 6 (
P E( Z ~'1i nutes
November 20, 1980
(
( . .__._~~~~~_u~.~~.~m.'._~"~~~~~-'~"~"::~~~~':'~~:~:i'~"v~:~~~ ~':-~.. :-::~~:~d" ~'i ~e . ~7
they have Dlade this request. He said theý
\~I e r' e d 2 n i e d the r e que s tin 1 978. ,:~,,;r
tI:+
#~
~1r. Anagnostis said he felt it \'/a~~~~Dnfair
to not be allowed to serve alcob61ic beverages
..}./'
with their food. He said thgt'-'no one would
be all o\'Jed to 1 eave the p'GerÎíi ses 'II; th an
a 1 coho 1 i c beverage. J""",,,,f"
Mr. Anagnostis saidf1~ would only be 5% of
the net sa 1 es a.,nd·· he fe 1 t they shaul d be
al1o\ved to s,~.ll a 1 cho 1 i c beverages as the
others in .,the area have. He said he had
made a .,s'{udy of the restaurants in the area
tha~~h~ve been allowed to sell alcoholic
b~v~rages with their food; they are Steak & Ale,
~~Jo Bee1s, Dos Gringos, Red Lobster) Bennigans,
,.,~ Dos Vecinos, and Jamiels) not taking into
consideration the places that sell beer for
off-premises consumption.
,',;
..
"r'
. '
.,.:,
The Chairman called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of or in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
.-(~
f( e
,.t.
There being no one wishing to speak regarding
this request, the Chairman closed the public
hearingft
.tJ~~
.,
i'.
.-{.-:{~'
~;~{;~/'
PZ 80-41 t:1r. BO\'Jen moved, seconded by t"1rs. Nash, to
;",/ APPROVED approve PZ 80-41 as requested. not; on carr; ed
,~ 3-0~
~"1- -. .~ -- -.,.-_..-_._-...~rí· --L_~'-iiW_~g,Ì1l-Îi"'1'- ~tî"'Å:.~~·~~"'~';;':~;"';";":;:'~·~~~;"f:~'.~~-~~~";~.~:-~'''':'':¡:'--·'<--.--"-¡;'. :-;--,-- ~:,;-_·_--r·_-~"'·_-~ - ---::-¡-.~'·!ii:--À-~~-__-·_ , " ~
PZ 80-42
Request of Dr. James Waggener to rezone Tract
170 and a portion of 168, Abstract 1606, from
its present classification of IF-7 to a
proposed classification of Local Retail.
This property is located on the east side of
Davis Blvd.) one block south of Emerald Hills
\,1 a y .
Beryl Ste\'Jart came for\'Jar'd to represent Or.
Waggener and the YMCA in their request." He
said they wanted to build a one story, 1600
sq. f t ~ doc tor I s c 1 i n i c . t,1 r. S t e\~J a y,t sa i d
this piece of land has a 125 ft. frontage
on Davis Blvd.
.
The Chairman called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of or in opposition to this
request to please come forwardg
Page 7
p & Z ~1i nutes
November 20, 1980
PZ 80-42
APPROVED
J
'\
Scotty ~torri son carne for\^Jard. He sa i d he
represented the ynCA \^Jho i s sell i ng the
property.. ~·1r. t¡1orrison said they feel it
would be an asset to the areaÞ
The Chairman called for anyone else wishing
to speak regarding this matter to please
come for\~Ja rd (;
There being no one else wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the public hearingÞ
t/lrs. Nas h ITIoved) seconded by t1r. Bo',~¡en, to
approve PZ 80-42 as requested~ The motion
carried 3-0.
~~au..,~_... ~_~~~,:~_~!~-':~."Jt..:"'~.. +·nr,""p1kl!,,:.~~..n·J~~·~:'^~~.!;~I(.-,! '; :-~~~-t_-Uf"'!"=-~"'::-~":,.~:;¡'!"·'!'.~~~:~~.~".;~"J:~~~~~.~~"-W'::='¡!".:~þ'¥_.., 2'S~,:~~~~::*~~::~~,,;·~···~··,-r...""·~~7~~!..,·þt'~1;~%~:s..~~~~~~~~_~.~~",~~~',f7!";I,.~~">. fI 11 11!11T .,,;:1'
PZ 80-43 Request of Russel M. Ha~'¡s to rezone Tract 38, /'
Abstract 308, from its present classificatioy
of f!lulti-faInily to a Py'oposed classificatio;l
of Local Retail. /11"
This property is located on the north ,>~de of
Ai rport Free\'iay Frontage Road and ag.pfoximately
250 ft. south\,¡est of the i nterse~)f"on of
Weyland Drive and the Frontag~~RDad.
.~.'"
Ernes t Hedgcoth, Con su 1 t i D~~lt\"'~Eng i neer ~ came
for\-¡ard to represent r·l'C¡ir"'Hav/s in thi s request.
He sa -i d r:1r. Ha\¡'Js neeqs'··' the rezoni ng so he can
build a tV·lo-story ,9'ffice building.
..f'./ß,,.rø>#~ "
þø:-f/
~,.,
/
.:;,'i
/"
,
""~~. :.._' .:~__. ~O_"'k~-!.';"'.',~~;~·'-"''r'~~::~',Lc,~'·:'~'":':~'-'''_.'-":-,''~.:>''" _' .::~ ".~"':':~: ':~"".:>~~: ,- ...;':-'-::.....;;.-'~~,.:.-___'" ~."';.'. _":-:.è'..:;'-'~-,'~.:-:'-:~_:."'.""_--:,:,,-'':':-' :~.-~-'f"--::~':='~'''':'' ~-~~,:.~:,"",~":.",,,,,,:~,,,,":"::.~.-..,:,,,:~'"'-""'''~~'''''-'''''''--- ...
(
...~4·
¡.¡r~"
k"
,.'..¡,.~..
.;~..
::.'~)~~' Y'
,,;!,f'.y
/
\..
.;'f
..y.
Mr. Hedgcoth~ãîd they are proposing to build
a t\\lo-story>,professional office building, but
he is noyrsure if any of the spaces are leased
yet, b,.ut'they have been talking "lith several
law~érs and. doctors regarding this.
:;4'~F'
~/~r. Hedgcoth said the building would have
.~,i~:s steel columns \'l-ith a rustic appearance similar
~~~ to Jo Beel ·s. He said it would be approximately
A/~f'P 20,000 sq. . ft. offi ce bu i 1 di ng v¡hi ch \\IOU 1 d have
,f>'- \'100 d t r u sse S \'1 i t h \';00 d and b r i c k .
t·lrs. rJas h asked i f the site p 1 an sho'.vn here i s
the said as the one on the plat.
Mr. Hedgcoth said tha't was only an architectural
drawing. He said the drawing cuts off too soon,
and they \'lould have more flexibilitJ' \'Jith vJhat
the plat shows.
f'1r 0 Greenfi e 1 d sa i d he sees other property
included in this site plan~
(
e
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
November 11, 1980
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas
Subject:
76118
3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-42,
IF-7 TO LR
e
We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that
we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
RWA/ljc
cc: Nr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City t1anager
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. - BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367
«)
rf)
0- c·
---:>
· J
3ál ..
~è~ I ,.~
II 5r. ~
" ]~
oJ -
~ I
~
N L' ENe ~o A C H MEN T SOT HER T H A ~ S H 0 V\: t~
_.~
. Co OF ~_
· ~~~ili·· .....~.f:~
I.b .' '. ~ ,
-~ . '.--'~ .
*." ."-1 .....'
....,. .................,.,
. LOVl) Bf~"'N50M
,. . . : . . . . . 0 . 0 . . . 0 . . . . . 00 . 0'
\~'. 953 ....,
v'· ., \. ~ .' 0
- ð/··.~'."~.·L~ f
.. '" c' 0 . . . · G~ "" .
.. , SUT"~þ
'.-
. IRÇ>N PtN
o IRON PIPE
 80lS ú'ARC C5TAKE
o CONCRETE MON
-x-x- FENCE
~CAlE 1": ¿o ·
fz gb-¥~
Lo-r- (
I
/
/
I
/----'
-- -----
---
I
I
I l úr~
~
L 0 c:-. K- 2-
/8':s-' -_
o ¿ E"
I
I
,
Lo,-¿
PL. ,...
~ c..~ 0
!!.C'.'~NI P
t<~
LOT4
LeIS
,J
r ~.
o~c:)
c~,
a .
tJ1
L brr L.
O.~8 Ac-~~
29,1..,21 S~.~.
S 89 0 3D'LÅJ
321.~ '
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED
BEING a o~ract of land out of the W. W. WALLACE SURVEY, Abstract
No. 1606, in the City of North Richland Hil1~, Tarrant County,
Texas, and bein0 a pñrt of the same tr~ct of land recorded in
Volume 3557, Page 652, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and
being described as follows I
BEGINNING at an iron pin situated at the Southwest corner of
Lot 1, Block 2, émerald Hills, First Section, an' addition to
the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas,
according to plat recorded in Volume 38A-19, Page 1, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE South 78 deqrees 56 minutes East 120.0 feet to an iron pin
for corner being the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 2, Emerald
Hills, First Section, an addition to the City of North Richland
Hills, Tnrrant County, Texas;
THENCE South 00 decrees 07 minutes West 60.0 feet to an iron pin
for cornerJ
THENCE South 89 degrees 30 minutes West 327.39 feet to an iron
pin for corner in the Easterly R.O.W. line of F. M. Highway
No. 1938 (Davis Blvd.);
THENCE Northerly along curve to the rioht with a radius of
5669.6 feet a distance of 1.25.0 feet to the place of beginninç
and containing 0.68 acres of lñnd.
L~GEND
LOYD BRANSOM SURVEYORS INC.
REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR
1028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE.
FT 0 WORTH, TEXAS 76111
834-3477
I DO HERE8Y CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP IST~UE
b CORRECT AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND.
~(9 6-,-~-
c LOT (j 8 RAN SOM
~ ATE / - /7' - J7 tJ ,
-11-ra- POWER LINE
ðt1·~~~..5
-T-T- TELEPHONE LINE
. II
e
ORDINANCE NO. ~~~
f\N ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN .ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMEN~~ENTS"
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS~ TEXAS,
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, NOVEMBER 13.
1967, AS Äl~ENDEO JANUARY 27., 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECO~~ENDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RIC~LAND HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
If
RESOLVED that òn Case No. PZ 80-42
be rezoned from ,lF~7
Lo~a 1 Reta i 1
th.e following descri'bed property shall
, ' . ,to
BEING a tract of land out of the W. VI. Hallace Survey, Abstract 1606, in the
City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, T'exas, and being a part of the
said tract of land recorded in Volume 3557~ Page 652, Deed Records, Tarrant
County, Texas, and being described as follows:
'"
BEGINNING at an iron pin situated at the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2,
E~erald Hills, First Section, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills,
, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-39, Page 1,
Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE South 78 degrees 56 minutes East 320~O feet to an iron pin for corner
being the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 2, Emer~ld Hills, First Sectiori,
an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas; .
THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes ~~est 60.0 feet to an iron pin for corner;
THENCE South 89 degrees 30 minutes West 327.39 feet to an iron pin ,for corner
in the Easterly R.O.W. line of F. M. Highway 1938 (Davis Blvd.);
THENCE Northerly along curve to the right with a radius of 5669.6 feet a
distance of 125.0 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.68 acres
of land.
. '
,
~..
:... -..
DATE:
11-25-80
('
/9
e
SUBJECT: PZ 80-43 Zoning request from Multi-Family to Local Retail
, '
'DEPARTi"-lENT:
Planni~g and Zoning Departm~nt
BACKGROUND:
Russel M~ Haws wishes to build a 2-story professional building with
offices for lawyers, doctors, etc. The building will be constructed of material
similar to Jo Beel·s which is just down the street.
i
. ,
This property is located on the north side of Airport Freeway Frontage Road,
approximately 250.feet southwest of the intersection of Weyland Drove and the Fr9ntage
Road.
. There were 4 1 etters sent to property owners wi thi n 200 "·feet of sa i d property ~
No o~e .spoke aga'inst this ·re~~est.
4IÞ The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this zoning request.
If this request"is denied, there will be no need to hear PS 80-55 which is the
final plat of såme property.
..
, :"-
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or denial ~of zonìng request.
BUDGETED , I T Eì~1 : YES . NO X
ACCOUNT t1 U ¡ 1 S E R : N/A
,"
-----~--~-----~------------~--~-------~----~--~~-~----~----~---~---------~--~--
e
,.~ . 1 ,. ----,:'\
.. .. 'if
Page 7 (
P & Z ~'i nutes
November 20, 1980
\,-
'!I!I~_ ........... J..~, .~,"~ ~1t)._. 'I' ..~.. ,~_...,_--t'-''''.~~~'':'"'~~~~'!»'''''-:---~~·~~'··~'''·------···~''''
~_....~.~. .,....., ---t-~\.....:...,...~~-....... ','Þ ......-...,..........._, ............a,t.-'..., ~_I _.....'.......~..."""',.................'.6'.....................'____~..-.~~..
.~
"V.. , .,' _ ,.....,
/.4':,>.,7/"
Scotty t·10îri son caine for\'¡ard. Hg,:-¡sa-î'd he
represented the Y~'1CA "Jho i s.._se-lli ng the
property. ~1r. ~1orris~Xt.,~s(rid. they feel it
would be an asset ~oÇthe area.
(-
'e
The Chairman called for anyone else wishing
tº~sp¿~k regarding this matter to please
'êome for'tlardc
..,..~~ .-/
," .-: .....-:'.-. ':,
#'..
There being no one else wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the public hearing~
/. ~~-::..,:<<f'~~
~;-::-:~.r-':¡:::';:'7"
/.~;~~4P'Z" 80-42
___::çY~-:-' APPROVED
...-.",,:~~.;:¡:"
~'
-~
.~IV
t~rs. Nas h moved, seconded by t'1r. Bo\~en, to
approve PZ 80-42 as requested~ The motion
carried 3-0.
_ ....~~~~~~~I~~_"J!'~~~.:.::..:.::.::-.:-:-.=:~~.".....ry--~.=-::-t~~.~~~.~~~~·~~:.-·.....':'4.t.~~~.··~".~:-_~·";,"',!',':-:"::"'~,;:,--:,,:,,:,,.~~;:::" I.· ,'" ->þ._._ ---.'-. .- ~.......,.,-.. ¿. .. .
....... p' ..._......1., _.. J.,...#..ø._.......'. ......
.,-~
PZ 80-43
R~quest of Russel M. Haws to rezone Tract 38,
Abstract 308, from its present classification
of Multi-family to a proposed classification
of Local Retail.
This property is located on the north side of
Airport Freeway Frontage Road and approximately
250 ft. southwest of the intersection of
Weyland Drive and the Frontage Road.
ce
Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Eng-ineer, canle
fOj~\'ard to represent r·'1r. Ha\'/s in thi s reques t.
He said Mr. Haws needs the rezoning so he can
build a t\'Jo-story office building,
Mr. Hedgcoth said they are proposing to build
a two-story professional office building~ but
he is not sure if any of the spaces are leased
yet, but they have been talking with several
la~~ers and doctors regarding this.
Mr. Hedgcoth said the building would have
steel columns with a rustic appearance similar
to Jo Beel's. He said it would be approximately
20,000 sq.. ft. office building which \,t/ould have
wood trusses with wood and brick.
t:1rs. tJash asked if the site plan shc\~n here is
the said as the one on the plat.
Mr. Hedgcoth said that was only an architectural
drawing. He said the drawing cuts off too söon,
and they \'/ould have more flexibility \'lith v/hat
the plat shows.
(,e
r,1r" Greenfield said he sees other property
included in this site plane
"..
.
Page 8
p & Z t/1i nutes
November 20, 1980
(
..,
(
\,
·e
r.lr. Hedgcoth said they may develop the
other property later, but at this time,
they are only committed to the property
in question which will be Lot 2, Block 5)
Richland Oaks Addition, 5th Filing. He
said the architectural drawing just shows
what could be developed there.
The Chairman called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of or in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak regarding
this request, the Chairman closed the public
hearing.
(
t:1r. BO\'/en moved, seconded by t1rs. Nash, to
approve PZ 80-43 as requested. The motion
carried 3-0.
__--.""~. ....~~."'~-''''__.=-..,..,..,.~-..~-,--<....".~'''---'.,._..~.-........"..._~_.._"...."......_._._.-__...J.....- "... .. . . u..,· . ._- ..... vr' , " .. . /
PS 80-55 Request of Russel M. Haws for final plat of ~
..' L~t,' 2, Block 5, Richland Oaks Addition, 5' tlJ,f
., Flll ng .,;;fr
//
.7'
Ernest Hedgcoth came for\\¡ard. He ?...a·frèl thi s
is the final plat of the property/just heard
for zoning to Local Retail. ,r/7
r.1r. Hedgcoth said they h.acr;~eviOUS1Y submitted
a preliminary plat f9p/7.8 acres, and now they
\'lant to fi na 1 p 1 at>~a" port; on of thi s property.
,,":,,'/
.;>'
t~r. Hedgcoth.."s-tated they had recei ved the
City Engiµ.eê'r's comments and have no problem
with any/of them. He said in regards to item
#1, ,thè developer \'/i11 use a six by six inch
tf.l.ppîng sleeve and valve as suggested in the
.~:/'·"etter; #2, the developer agrees to pay the
~y~;J' pro rata share of the si x-i nch water 1 i ne
/,' along Airport Freeway at $4.00 per linear foot
~_~ for 87.62 feet or $350.48; #3, the developer
agrees to pay the pro rata cost of the lO-inch
sevIer 1 i ne runni ng along the northern boundary
line of the subject's property which is 131.5 ft.
at $5.50 per foot or $723.25; #4, the zoning
~ill be placed on the final plat; and #5, the
utility companies will be contacted concerhing
any required easements to be placed on the plat.
t1r. Hedgcoth said they would grant. the utility
companies the 5 ft. easement which they had
requested across the northern boundary.
PZ 80-43
APPROVED
.~",::;.~
<~,""
.~~;
,.$~"t.
",;.'
,~,,¿.'.;'" j;;;;.
e ", .,,:?/::)""
·~r
.....-,,.¡'-'-.+'
.'/
.//
II,"
(
1 ~
r J.....
1 ~mr1/ ~---'M ,I
I V ~ t.. T'l IRIP:IIUi III iii 9JØ/f'111:7
..3_ f\'li!
I ....
TU
-a..
e
e
-
(
"
(
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
November 11, 1980
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject:
3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 80-43
MF TO L.R.
We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that
we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
r~
R~~A/ljc
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
SSO FIRST STATE SANK BLDG.· BEDFORD. TEXAS 78021 - 817/283..6211- METRO/267-3367
.;, -~. ',þ.....' -.j"
e
e
e
ORDINANCE NO. '+>~ d ¿)
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN. ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE XXIX CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS,.
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179, ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS.
PASSED. APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION'AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS~ NOVEMBER 13.
1967, AS ~~ENDEO JANUARY 27. 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RIC~lAND HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: '
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 80-43 the followfng described property shall
be rezoned from Mu ~ tip 1 ~ ' ~ ami 1 Y , .. , , ' .' '.'..,.':.',: ~ . : : .,' ' .. , to
Local Retail.
BEING a tract of land in the E. S. Carder Survey, Abstract 308, situated in
Tarrant County, Texas, a·nd bei ng more parti cul a'rly descri bed by metes and
bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin in the South line of University Palza Addiiton as
shown on a plat of record in Volume 388-92, Page 33~ Plat Records, Tarrant·
County, Texas, said point being South 89 degrees 36 minutes 59 seconds East
, 71.39 feet from the Southwest corner of said Addition;
THENCE South 0 degrees 10 minutes. 50 seconds West 251~03 feet to an iron pin
in the Northerly R.O.W. line of State Highway No. 121-A;
THENCE South 44 degrees 09 minutes 03 seconds West'43.29 feet to an iron pin
for corner;
THENCE South 42 degrees 56 minutes 10 seconds West 44.33 feet continuing along
said R.O.W. line to an iron pin for corner in same, said point being in the
Easterly line of an access easement to Miller-Epoch Corporation as described
in Volume 6741, Page 1209, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; -
THENCE North 47 degrees 03 minutes 50 seconds West 193.23 feet along said line
to an iron pin in same for corner;
THENCE North 0 degrees 05 minutes West 184.28 feet along the Easterly line of
said easement to an iron pin for corner in the South line of a tract described
in a deed to Miller-Epoch Corporation as recorded in- Volume 6630, Page 945,
Deed RecordS, Tarrant County, Texas; .
THENCE'South 89 degrees 36 minutes 59 seconds East at 131.5 feet pas~ing an
iron pin at the Southeast corner of the last referenced tract, same being the
Southwest corner of University Plaza Addition, above referenced and continuing
in all, 202.89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing'l.205 acres.
.. .. ','-,
e
Ie
e
·P·ag~ 2
\ .
Thl$ pråperty is located .onthe north side of Airport FreewaFronta e Roadt
approximately '250 feet sou wes o. , e lnter$ectlon of Weyland DriVe an
the Frontage Road. ' .
..... ¡¡: '.
. .
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND. ZONING COMMISSION THIS 20th
NOVEMBER, 1980. -
DAY OF
ëM" .!) ,'-,/' .-,' ..j,
, J¿ I'" f. ~. . . .,'. · ,/ J Y ,
! I ~ ¡i 'J /' ). ,:>v-.;A./v~
./'~·...;t~ ,-":..;-- .' --:.t .
. " l'\ .' "
C~IRMAN PLANNING ~~O~ING C~ISSION
~:J, ~ .. ~ "- G;;) è.......-;¡ . /j .
SEcJ;A~ ~~~~ ZONI~(f co~rsíðN:?d.--
. BE IT ,ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING
IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 80~43 IS
HEREBY 'REZONED ..
THIS' 'DA Y ,OF 1980 .
MAYOR DICK FARAH, ,
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND'HILLS'
ATTEST: .
.' ,
CITY SECRETARY JEANETTE MOORE
'CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .'
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
/i
I ~ ... ~ ;..,
DATE:
11-25-80
(
;¿/
e
SUBJECT:
PS 80-55 Final plat of Lòt 2, Block 5, Richland Oaks Addition, 5th Filing
~
- ,
DEP fl.RTf"tENT:
BACKGROUND:
Planning and Zoning Department
This is the same property as was heard in PZ 80-43. This property
was previously preliminary platted in a 7.8 acre tract and this final plat is only
a portion of that property.
i
a ,
They have agreed to all· the Engineer1s comments.
e
The Planntng~nd Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request subject to
the Engineer'~ co~ents and the additional easements as requested by TESCO ánd
.
Southwestern Béll.
=--
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial Qf fin~l plat.
....
-
.
'" X
BUDGETED ITEr~1 : YES . NO
ACCOUNT NUr'ÎSER: N/A
-.
. . ,.
-
-
..
-
~------~--~~~-~------~~~--~~--~-------~----~-~---~-~--~-----------~----~~------
e
..........
"'-
~: <f~:#
Page 8 (
P & Z f'1; nutes
November 20, 1980
(
( _0
..\ iiAlilJ' :rlii.ÜJ!· IN''þ'~''' .4..,·· "!~H ..~~~...
........ '¡'. -'. "f~-",L r-~ ~Ä " ~j. ,.! ....~~
r;lr. Hedgcoth said they may develop the,..
other pr'operty 1 ater, but at thi SJj.;ff( ,
they are only committed to the,,~~fJroperty
i n que s t ion 'II hie h VI i 11 b e .~ø·~" 2, B 1 0 C k 5,
Richland Oaks Additio~~1h Filing. He
said the architectura1 drawing just shows
what could be~developed there. '
. ~/~
The Ç.b,a1fman call ed for anyone \\ ; shi ng to
specfk in favor of or in opposition to this
/
/. "",/ request to please come fOr\'/ard.
~;,.~
,,,
~~. There being no one wishing to speak regarding
.v~ this request, the Chairman closed the public
p_"'/ hearing.
~#
,./,
~Z 80-43 Hr. Bo'tlen moved, seconded by t1rs. Nash, to
./ ~_.c ~.:~~:~:~.~. _----.----~~~~-~~~l,.~~:~~..::~:.=~~aø:.:'~::::-.--
PS 80-55
Request of Russel M. Haws for final plat of
Lot 2, Block 5, Richland Oaks Addition, 5th
Filing.
e
(
\
Ernest Hedgcoth came forward. He said this
is the final plat of the property just heard
for zoning to Local Retail.
e
(
Mr. Hedgcoth said they had previously submitted
a preliIninary plat for 7.8 acres, and no\' they
want to final plat a portion of this property.
Mr. Hedgcoth stated they had received the
City Engineer's comments and have no problem
with any of them. He said in regards to item
#1, the developer will use a six by six inch
tapping sleeve and valve as suggested in the
letter; #2, the developer agrees to pay the
pro rata share of the six-inch water line
along Airport Freeway at $4.00 per linear foot
for 87.62 feet or $350.48; #3, the developer
agrees to pay the pro rata cost of the lO-inch
sewer line running along the northern boundary
line of the subject's property which is 131.5 ft.
at $5.50 per foot or $723.25; #4, the zoning
will be placed on the final plat; and #5, the
utility companies \'Jill be contacted concerning
any required easements to be placed on the plit.
f1r. Hedgcoth said they would grant. the utility
companies the 5 ft. easement which they had
requested across the northern boundary.
-' ~.I --... .
e
e
(
e
(
Page 9
P &. Z Minutes
November 20, 1980
PS 80-55
APPROVED
ADJOURNMENT
(.
-/
(J
The Chairman called for' anyone wishing to
speak in favor of or in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one to speak, the Chairman
closed the public hearing.
t1r. Bo\~en moved, seconded by r~rs. Nash, to
approve PS 80-55 subject to the Engineer's
comments and the additional easements as
requested~ The motion carried 3-0.
The meeting adjourned at 8:35 P.t\1.
CHAIRt·1AN, PLANNING AND ZONING COr1r~'1ISSION
SECRtTARY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
("
(
ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers
e
PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING
November 19, 1980
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
P. O. Box 13305
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Attention: Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Commission
Ref. Final Plat Lot 2, Block 5 - Richland Oaks Addition
5th Filing
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
We have received the November 12 letter concerning the
engineering comment for the above referenced project. The
following comments are made in regard to numbers as listed
in the engineer IS letter of November 12th.
e
1. The developer will use a six by six inch
tapping sleeve and valve as suggested in the
letter.
2. The developer agrees to pay the pro rata
share of the six-inch water line along the
Airport Freeway. $4.00 per linear foot
for 87.62 feet or $350.48.
3. The developer agrees to pay the pro rata cost
of the ten-inch sewer line running along the
northern boundary line of the subjectls pro-
perty. 131.5 feet at $5.50 per foot or $723.25.
4. The zoning will be placed on the final plat.
5. The utility companies will be contacted con-
cerning any required easements to be placed
on the plat.
If you have any addi tional questions. concerning this proj ect
or this plat, please contact me at 625-5504.
Sincerely yoursø
e
6 <-::¿L/-~
/- /-X:&~r (' ~-' 1'---/
,Y': ~)--L-~r-. -- (~>
Ernest Hedgcotñ
EH/ch
235 Livestock Exchange Building · 131 East Exchange Avenue · Fort Worth, Texas 76106 · 817-625-5504
(
\
(
e
City of ~rth Richland Hills, Texas
~/¡ \ ,,If
_~__~~I,A-,/! ~
''x--:;-
I /~ ! I~~
jý \ I ~
iI
f
TO:
Planning & Zoning Commission
November 18, 1980
DUM 0022-80
FROM:
Allen Bronstad
Director of Utilities
SUBJECT:
Pro-rata Share of Water and Sewer
PS 80-55, Final Plat
Lot 2, Block 5, Richland Oaks Addition
The developer will be required to pay his pro-rata share of the
existing 6-inch water line in Airport Freeway. The pro-rata
at $4.00 per linear foot for a total distance of 87.62 feet,
the total cost of water pro-rata $350.48.
e
The developer will be required to pay his pro-rata share of
the existing lO-inch sanitary sewer line which borders on a
portion of the north property line. The pro-rata at 5.50 per
linear foot, based on an equivalent 8-inch line for a total
distance of 131.5 feet, total cost of sewer pro-rata is $723.25.
The total cost of water and sewer pro-rata is $1,073.73.
-
\
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118
/
t.
e
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Planning and Zoning Dept
P.O. Box 13305
North Hichland Hills, Texas 76118
Wanda Calvert,
This letter is in reference to, final plat for Richland
o~~s, 5th filing, lot2, block 5.
e
Please see additional easement requested on attached plat
recorded in red.
Questions on this matter may be referred to Roy Broussard
on 267..8371.
w-r~
/Jot Manager...oSP Engineer
V- Northeast District
e
·'
( ,J
\,~
.
TEXAS
~"'L' ·~C' T,,' R~ 'c
~t: ~, ;:.".,' ., ';" 11 ::,
,:;,,) ,
:!!)
~ö
SERVICE
COMPANY
November 17, 1980
Ms. Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Dept.
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Ms. Calvert:
~e
Texas Electric Service Company has reviewed the proposed replat
of Lot 2, Block 5, Richland Oaks, 5th Filing Addition to the
City of North Richland Hills, Texas.
Additional easements are requested as shown in red on the attached
plat.
If we may be of further assistance, please call.
Yours very truly,
Ít~. 9 ~~~
Wm. G. Stewart, P.E.
Commercial & Industrial Supervisor
WGS : 1 f j
cc: R. L. Fain
-
p < O. BOX 9 7 0 · FOR T \AI 0 R T H. rEX 1\ S 7 6 '1 01 .. TEL Ë ¡.-:¡ ~-¡ () :"~ E (S 1 7') 3 ~:3 ':.) .'+ '¡ '1
r
l..
(
e
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
November 12, 1980
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-890, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RICHLAND OAKS ADDN., LOT 2, BLOCK 5,
FINAL PLANS, PS 80-55
e
We have reviewed the captioned materials for the subject subdivision and
offer the following comments:
1. ~Je would request that a 611X6" tapping sleeve and valve be used
rather than a 6"X611 tee for the proposed fir'e hydrant installation
on the existing 6-inch line in the Airport Freeway to avoid
interruption of service and the possibility of line contamination.
2. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the
existing 6-inch water line in the Airport Freeway. We would
estimate pro rata at $4.00 per linear foot for a total distance of
87.62 feet.
3. The Developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the
existing 10-inch sanitary sewer line which borders on a portion of
the north property line. We would estimate pro rata at $5.50 per
linear foot, based on an equivalent 8-inch line, for a total
distance of 131.5 feet.
4. We would request that the zoning for this lot be shown on the plat.
5. The utility companies should be consulted concerning any existing
or future easement requirements which they may have that are not
provided on this pla~.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
~
e
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
Rt~A/ljc
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
Mr. J.M. Madera, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367
DATE: 12/3/80
SUBJECT: Specifications for City Hall Computer System
DEPARTMENT: Finance
BACKGROUND: Specifications for the Computer System include hardware, programming,
education, system support, financial , immediate programming requirements and
near future programming requirements.
Dick Pinner will be present to answer questions.
ukti
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of specifications
BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
CITY OF NORTH RICHLANC HILLS
SPECIFICATIONS FOR A COMPUTER SYSTEM
I. GENERAL
Bid proposals will be accepted for supplying a municipal
cata base system. including hardware, system support
software, application programs . and hardware /software
service . All bids must be firm for a period of sixty (60)
days from date of bid opening. All bidders will furnish a
list of comparable installations located within the State of
Texas which use similar systems . Cemonstrated capability to
provide data processing services to other municipalities. as
well as a history of good performance and reliability. will
be considered by the Council as factors in awarding bids.
A Bidders Conference will be held on (Cate) at ( Time) in
( Place) . Bidders must be represented at this conference to
be eligible for consideration.
Council reserves the right to reject ary and all bids .
Bid prices shalt include delivery and installation costs at
the City of North Richland Hills, 7371 N. E. Loop 82C, North
Richland hills , Texas 16118. Partial payments will not be
made and contract for system will not be complete until all
hardware, system support software. and application programs
cefined herein as " Immediate Requirements " are installer and
usable.
II. COMPUTER HARDWARE
A . Processor shall be of sufficient design and capacity to
support the total municipal system. including those
application programs herein defined as " Immediate
Requirements" and "Near suture Requirements" . Terminal
response and task throughput times will be considered by
the Council as factors in awarding bids.
B. The system shall provide selective levels of system,
file. anc work-station security.
C . Work-station terminals shall be of familiar keyboard
design (typewriter arrangement and 10-key pad).
Immediate work-station requirements include a minimum
of five (5) terminals plus the command console or, if
the command console may not be used for a work-station,
a minimum of six (6) terminals. Near future
requirements include as many as sixteen (16)
work-station terminals.
D. Printer capacity shall be sufficient to provide
reasonable through-put time.
E . System shall provide both historic and catastrophic
backup of critical files on removable recording media .
F. System shall be capable of supporting a point-of-sale
terminal.
G. Operating environment will be primarily an office
environment.
III . FROGRAMMING
A . Programs♦ both system supoort and application , shall be.
as nearly as possible. transparent to the user with a
simplified command language or method. Ease of
operation and of operator training shall be considered
by the Council as factors in awarding bids.
6 . Application programs shall conform with good accounting
principles, where applicable, and shall satisfy MFOA
procedures, where applicable.
C . Application programs shall be written in a high-level
Language such as COBOL or RPG .
0. ALL applications programs shall be fully documented.
including such items as operating instructions, data
flow, processing flow, interpretation of ccced data.
program Lists . and machine-readable source code .
E . Utility programs shall be provided to facilitate such
needs as special report generation„ data inquiry and
maintenance , sorting, and screen formatting .
IV. EDUCATION
Bid shall state what type of education and training are available
for managers . operators , and programmers . Bid shall indicate
where courses are available. fees, availability of self-study
courses , and availability of on-site training.
V. SYSTEM SUPPORT
Bid shall state what maintenance is available, where the hardware
gets repaired, how many customer engineers are available locally,
and what hours maintenace Is available.
VI. FINANCIAL
Bid shall state :
A . What rental plans are available.
B . What type of lease is offered and what are the penalties
for early cancellation .
C . Any purchase option with lease or rental , any accruals.
D . Any special plan for city governments .
E . Costs associated with the system.
F . Costs for additional capacity for each of the hardware
components.
VII . IMMEDIATE PROGRAMMING REQUIREMENTS
A . Municipal Accounting - This should be a package of
programs which include procedures for General Ledger,
Budget , and Accounts Payable. Cata files must be
developec with record of all financial transactions and
provide adequate Listings to satisfy MEGA procedures.
Approximate number of transactions each month include
75C accounts payable, 100 journal entries, 30C purchase
orders , 15 budgetary departments, with 50 lire items
each department .
B. Payroll - Must be capable of handling all payroll
procedures for bi-weekly payments for up to 370
accounts. Should automatically post these payments to
accounting file controls. Shoulc be able to provide
Texas Municipal Retirement System reports , Workmans
Compensation costs, Unemployment taxes costs, monthly
FICA report , and annual w -2. Must automatically post
transactions to accounting tiles with appropriate
pre-editing , balancing, and audit controls.
C . Taxes - Municipal tax system which will recorc property
descriptions and values for upt to 15 , 000 parcels and up
to 13 ,500 customers. Must be able to account for
payments received and delinquent amounts. Must calculate
penalties and interest . Must automatically post
transactions to accounting files and furnish appropriate
pre-editing , balancing , and controls.
C . Utilities - A package of programs for printing utility
bills, accounting for payments and recording 12 months '
historical data , process approximately 15, 000 accounts,
and 1 ,000 delinquent accounts. Must automatically post
transactions to accounting files with appropriate pre-
editing, balancing. and audit controls.
E . Municipal Court - a program package to record and
account for approximately 1200 transactions per month.
Must automatically post transactions to accounting files
and furnish appropriate pre-editing. balancing, and
audit controls.
F. Bidder shall describe installation services and start -
up assistance which will be provided, including computer
usage which may be provided for conversion of cata prior
to installation. Charges for this service . if any, must
be indicated in bid .
VIII. NEAR FUTURE PROGRAMMING REQUIREMENTS
A. Dispatch system for police and fire departments
1 ) Computer aided dispatch
2 ) Incident reporting
3) Manpower allocation
4 ) Emergency response
5 ) Fire and ambulance incident recording
6) Inspections
7) Training
B . Planning
1 ) Land use
2 ) Variances and permits
3 ) Assessor' s data
4) Census data
. .
e
~ '
e
.
~_3
DATE:
12/3/80
SUBJECT: Ordinance on the revision of the rules, regulations, policies
and procedures for the water and sewerage system.
DEPARTMENT: Utility
BACKGROUND: See attached Engineer letter on specific changes requested.
e
e
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQU,IRED:
Approval of ordinance
BUDGETED ITE~1:
YES N/A NO
ACCOUNT NUjv!SER:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e
KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGiNEERS / Fort vVorth-Oatlas
November 7, 1980
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-500, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
REVISIONS TO THE "RULES, REGULATIONS,
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE WATER AND
SEWERAGE SYSTEr:1u
In accordance with your instructions, we have prepared additions and changes
to the subject manual, as presented in the enclosed revision pages, for
your review and Council consideration. These revisions consist generally
of the following items:
1. Fire protection coverage to include entire platted area.
2. Limitation on use of 4-inch water lines.
3. Elimination of cast iron and asbestos cement water pipe. Only
ductile iron, PVC and concrete steel cylinder permitted on future
installations.
4. Adjustmant to finished grade of water valve boxes, meter boxes,
manholes, cleanouts, etc. required by Contractor.
5. Fine for unauthorized operring or closing of water systan valves.
We will be available to discuss with you and the Council these proposed
revisions at your convenience.
_p~w, ()tL
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RHA/ljc
Enclosures
c c : tfl. r. C h a r 1 e s ~i. Wi·J 1 i am s, City Man ag e Y'
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211- METRO/267-3367
ORDINANCE NO.
e
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that ORDINANCE NO. 381, "Rules, Regulations, Policies and
Procedures for the City of North Richland Hills Water and Sewer System"
adopted November 8, 1971, and as heretofore amended, be and the same
is hereby AMENDED by substituting the pages numbered, 30, 31, 34, 58, 59,
62,63, 63a, 63b, 64, 64a, 65, 65a, 66a, and 67, as Exhibit ItA" for the
correspondingly numbered pages, if any, contained in such ordinance.
The policy, procedure and specification changes presented in
Exhibit nAil shall take effect on
e
APPROVED AND PASSED in regular Council Meeting on this the
day of , 1980.
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex ~1cEnt ire, Ci ty Attorney
e
/
·~'.'~"~~.......,
" ",:,~
,',1 :
,:. ',.,
/V ~I~
.\I~
/I":....J
~""'fi'
.~,~.';;./. . ~.'.....
\,(.:... ',.,
~..'\.' . ,}""
~.'..'.'.:,..; !Þ'""""~.,{.:;..,,!,......._,,, ,~'.
. ¡'>.~,
x"l' c,:.,~
~ \.~
[t-~
,.,.. .:~
'~;:f ;1
~:;A
u.¡'1
i~
sf
i~r~t_
~ . ,).~\
~"\ .{~ '. ~
~~ ,:;} ;1
h..'..,;i. y .'.."'"
'';'j ~
.:.;kt~a.,¡;,::~f ~
.,,!~
~'1
j,f-
'';'ì!f?'
~.:".
~,,:.....~. '.
~r:)
:~~:t~/¡
,-<?'>if 'ß> .:";,;
'.,~ .~,~."
f\' "':;~
...~ í'
ç~ ;\~
~~ ~~
¡~~ ~. /¡~
.;.~ ~'r" "r"..
y" "~' ',-.-." "''\.--,''''' ,..
~ . "~ :' ~ ~'h:/'"' .' . .
t~ ~;i ,J:';':';:
e
maintenance and operation of the system. These valves shall be n~1uellern,
or approved equal.
3. Standard three-way, improved type, dry head fire hydrants constructed to
provide a minimum of three (3') feet of cover over the connecting main
shall be installed at locations such that all areas of single family
development are located within a five hundred (500') foot radius from a
fire hydrant or all such hydrants will be placed 50 that hose line routes
will be no more than eight hundred (800') feet by public right-af-way.
In the areas other than single family development fire hydrants shall be
on a three hundred (300') foot radius. The area of development shall be
defined as the full area delineated by the limits of the approved develop-
ment plat. These fire hydrants shall be IIMuellerll, or approved equal.
4. All fire hydrants shall be installed with a cut off valve and shall be
served by a six inch (611) or larger Supply or Oistribution Main.
5. Four inch (411) Distribution r~ain5 shall be ductile iron pipe and shall
not be used to serve more than twenty (20) Standard 3/4" Service Con-
nections or ten (10) Double 3/411 Service Connections and no 4" Distri-
bution Mains shall exceed one thousand feet (1,000') in length between
direct connections to larger mains. Four inch (4") mains may be in-
stalled in cul-de-sacs to serve not more than four (4) residential
customers, provided that no fire hydrants are required in the cul-de-sac.
e
6. All distribution mains from nominal 611 1.0. to 12" 1.0. inclusive shall
be either ductile iron or PVC in accordance with the Standard Specifi-
cations.
7. All supply Mains and Distribution Mains installed within a Developer's
platted and filed area of development must extend to the borders of his
development as required for future extension of the City's system,
regardless of whether or not such extensions are required for service
within the area of development.
8. After installation of water lines and curb and gutter the Contractor
will be required to install all meter boxes to top of curb grade at his
own expense. The City will furnish the meter boxes., In addition, the
Contractor will be required to adjust all valve boxes, fire hydrants,
etc., to top of curb grade if the water main is located behind the curb
and gutter. Afterwards, the Builder or Homeowner will be responsible
for adjusting valve boxes, fire hydrants, meter boxes, etc., to finished
lot grade upon final inspection.
9. A $200 fine will be levied against any unauthorized person or persons
opening or closing a City water valve without the ,express permission and
supervision of the City Utility Department.
R 09/23/74
R 11/28/77
Page 30
./'
e
10. Water system extensions and improvements shall be designed in accordance
with Master Water and Sewer Plan.
c. SEWERAGE SYSTEM DESIGN AND CONTSTRUCTION STANDARDS.
1. All materials and workmanship used in extensions or improvements to the
City's sewerage system shall conform to the latest revisions of the
applicable sections of the American Society of Testing Materials Standards
as prescribed in the latest revision of the Detailed Specifications
which have been adopted by the City; a copy of which is on file at the
offices of the City and will be made available for inspection upon
request. All installations shall conform to the latest applicable
Design Criteria for Sewerage Systems as published by the Texas State
Department of Health.
2. Approach Sewers shall be designed with consideration for serving the
full drainage area subject to collection by the system, but modified as
governed by the projected rate of development and the financial feasi-
bility of the proposed extension. Lateral Sewers shall be designed to
serve the planned area of development with provision for extension where
possible into adjacent undeveloped areas.
The population density for undeveloped areas shall be based on sur-
rounding development, but shall not be less than 9.5 persons per acre
unless approved otherwise by the City. The contributing sewage flow
shall be determined on the basis of an average flow of 100 gallons per
person per day without separate provision for infiltration. Outfall
Sewers, Approach Sewers and Collector Sewers shall be designed on the
basis of the following peaking factor formula:
Peaking Factor = 1 + 14
4 + V p
P = Population expressed in thousands.
3. All Lateral Sewers or Sewer Mains installed within a Developer's platted
and filed area of development must extend to the borders of his develop-
ment as required for future extensions of the collecting system regardless
of whether or not such extensions are required for service within the
development.
4. Detailed determination of the'sanitary sewerage area shall be the re-
sponsibility of the City. Where there
Page 31
e
11. The following design practices shall be consiØered as generally appli-
cable) but they may be modified by concurrence of the City's Eng;neer(s)
and Director in specific cases where they are impractical.
No sewers other than Service Sewers and House Sewers shall be less than
s ; x (6 ") i n c h e sin d i am e t e r .
Service Sewers and HouseSe\'ers shall not be less than four (4") inches
in diameter and shall approach the "Lateral Sewer" on at least a one
(1%) percent grade.
All Lateral and Approach Sewers shall be designed with hydraulic slopes
sufficient to give mean velocities, when flowing full or half-full of
not less than two (2.01) feet per second based on Kutter's or f1anning1s
formula using an "n" valve of 0.013. Grades which will produce velocities
in excess of five (51) feet per second shall be avoided.
Se\~ers shall be laid in straight alignment wherever possible. Where
horizontal curvature must be used, the smallest radius shall be one
hundred (100') feet. Manholes shall be constructed at all changes in
alignment) grade or size of sewer intersection of other sewers except
Service Sewers and at the ends of all sewer lines that will be extended.
Intersecting sewers shall enter the manholes at the crown line or top of
the intersection or main sewer and the inverts of all manholes shall be
formed concave to fit the connecting sewer pipes.
e
12. All six (6") inch and eight (SU) inch sewer lines shall be' air tested
and hold four (4) P.S.I. for twenty (20) minutes. All ten (lO") inch
and larger sewer mains shall hold three (3) P.S.I. for fifteen (15)
minutes.
13. The Contractor will be required to adjust all sanitary sewer manholes
and cleanouts to top of curb grade after construction of curb and gutter
if the sewer main is located behind the curb. Afterwards) the Builder
or Homeowner will be responsible for adjusting manholes and cleanouts to
finished lot grade upon final inspection.
The top of the manhole cone shall be installed at least 18 inches below
the proposed finished grade with final adjustment of-rim made with
precast reinforced concrete grade rings or red face brick, as shown
in the manhole detail on page 82.
e
R 11/28/77
Page 34
Item
Trenching and Backfill
such usage. All necessary precautions shall be taken by the Contractor, and
provisions shall be made for the protection of the new work, and all blasting
shall be so conducted as not to endanger persons or property. Only a sufficient
.quantity of explosives for the immediate day's work shall be kept at the site of
the work by the Contractor. Caps, exploders and explosives shall be stored separ-
ately. The Contractor shall be responsible for, and shall make good, any damage
caused by blasting or accidental explosions.
12. Tunnelling and Casing.
Tunnelling under highways, streets, or railroads shall be accomplished
by means of jacking and tunnelling equipment which has been approved prior to
starting tunnelling operations. Tunnels shall be pressure grouted or backfilled
as completely as practicable with selected materials, compacted by means of mechanic
tampers or hydraulically placed in such manner that no voids remain between the
backfilled material and the roof of the tunnel. Tunnelling and casing shall be
further in accordance \vith the Item, IIRailroad and Highway Crossings" or as further
provided in the Special Provisions or shown on the plans.
\)
13. Crossings to be Kept Open.
At such street, railroad, and all other crossings as may be designated~
by the Engineer, the trenches are to be hand tamped and filled in such a manner as
to prevent any serious interruption of traffic upon the roadway or sidewalks, the
cost thereof to be borne by the Contractor.
14. Protection of Unfinished Work.
Before leaving work for the night, or during a storm, or at other times
care must be taken to protect and securely close the unfinished end of the pipe.
Any earth or other materials that may find entrance into the pipe through any such
open or unplugged end of the pipe must be removed at the Contractor's expense.
15. Lights and Guards.
The Contractor must provide and maintain adequate de.tours around the
work under construction. The Contractor must provide sufficient lights, warning
signs, and watchmen to provide adequately for the safety of the public.
16. Backfill, Materials and Workmanship.
Excavation shall be backfilled only with approved materials; the type of
backfill shall vary according to the type of pipe being installed.
(A) Unless special granular embedment or encasement ;s required, the initial
blinding-over of the pipe shall be as follows:
(1) All polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe shall be embedded and blinded over
with not less than 4" below & 4" above the barrel of pipe with select
"hauled-in" cushion sand. Material from the trench will not be use'i
for cushion sand unless the Contractor furnishes suitable reports )m
an independent laboratory showing that it has proper qualities.
Page 58
e
Item
Trenching and Backfill
(2) All ductile iron or steel cylinder concrete pipe laid on rock or in
clay material with P.I. of 20 or greater shall be embedded and blinded
over with not less than 4" below and 4" above barrell of pipe with
select IIHauled-in" cushion sand.
(3)
Ductile iron or steel cylinder concrete pipe laid through materials
of P.I. less than 20 which granulate or crumble to particles less
than 1" in size may be blinded and backfilled with the native material
unless some other condition is found that would be deterimental to
this installation. Embedding and blinding must be not less than 4"
below and 411 above barrel of pipe.
(4)
All clay or other sewer pipe shall be blinded and backfilled with
native material where the excavated material is good earth free from
rock, broken concrete, broken pavement or other lumpy material larger
than 1" in the greatest dimension. The pipe shall be blinded by
carefully placing by hand, and hand or mechanically tamping layers
to a height twelve 02") inches above the pipe.
(B) After initial blinding-over has been accomplished as specified above, the
remainder of the backfill shall be placed and treated depending upon the
location of the trench as follows:
-
(1) Where trenches are located in open or undeveloped land, and in land
which has not been planned or platted and submitted for review by the
City Planning Commission or City Council, backfill shall be added to
the trench to bring it up to natural ground level. The ditch shall
then be allowed to settle with additional fill material added from
time to time as natural settlement is accomplished and until all back-
fill has stabilized or the period of maintenance as prescribed for
the project has expired.
(2) Where trenches are located in land for which a preliminary plan has
been or is being presented to the City Planning Commission or City
Council, the backfill shall be jetted until all settlement has been
ceased. Jets shall be used at not over six (6) foot spacing and On
alternate sides of the trench. After jetting arid prior to any street
construction in the area planned, the ditches shall be thoroughly
"walked in" by tracked machinery and any settlement corrected by
addition of material up to ground level.
(3) Where trenches are located in areas dedicated as streets in a plat
which is filed of record, these trenches shall be backfilled with
select material from trench excavation and this backfill shall be
hand or mechanically tamped in not more than six (6") inch layers
or hydra-tamped to minimum 90% density. If the material is dry,
and if so instructed, the Contractor shall moisten the backfill
material in order to obtain satisfactory compaction.
(4) Where trenches are located in existing paved streets, all excavated
material shall be removed from the site and the full trench above
initial embedment filled with crushed stone or other approved
granular material of a nature that
Page 59
.
e
ITEM
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
1. Description.
This item covers the material and labor required for the construcion
of the water distribution system, or extensions to the existing system as shown on
the plans. Included are all mains, laterals, valves, valve boxes and appurtenances
unless specifically covered by separate specification item.
"Service Connections", IIRailroad and High'tlay Crossings" and other special
devices and situations will be covered by separate items.
This specification item may be amended or adapted to the particular
project by the "Special Provisions."
2. Excavations and Backfilling.
All trenching and backfill shall be accomplished in confonnity with
the specification item, IITrenching and Backfill", and the costs of furnishing and
placing cushion sand or other embedment material as required in Section 16 of
the "Trenching and Backfillll item shall be included in the installed price of each
size and type of pipe unless specifically provided otherwise in the "Special Pro-
visions" and "Proposal fl.
"
3.
Selection of Pipe Type.
All buried distribution system pipe used on this project shall be Ductii~
Iron, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or Copper suitable for working pressure of at least
150 p.s.i., unless otherwise provided in the "Special Provisions" or shown on the
plans. The selection of pipe type for any given situation shall be governed as
follows:
(a) All service lines 2" and smaller shall be Type ilK" copper.
(b) All distribution mains smaller than nominal 611 1.0. shall be
ductile iron and if smaller than 4n~ joint lengths shall not
exceed 12 feet, nor shall wall thickness be les_s than 0.2511.
(c) All distribution mains from nominal .611 1.0. to 1211 1.0. inclusive
shall be either ductile iron or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) at
Contractor's 'option, with the type selected to be stated in the
Proposal.
(d) Pipe larger than ncxninal 1211 1.0. will be of type selected by
the City based upon the individual circumstances of the particular
job involved.
Galvanized steel or other special types of pipe shall be used only
when specifically approved and provided on the plans or in the "Special Provisions."
Where more than one class of pipe is required, the location of the various classes
will be shown on the plans.
Page 62
e
4. Materials Specifications.
4.1 Copper Pipe shall be cold drawn seamless tubing and it shall
conform to A.S.T.M. Specification B88-66a, Type K; Federal Specifi-
cation WW-T-799, Type K; and AWWA C800-66, Type K. All brass castings
shall conform to A.S.T.M. Specification 862-63 for Composition Bronze
or Ounce Metal Castings.
4.2 Ductile Iron Pipe in sizes 3" through 54" nominal 1.0. shall confonn
to the latest edition of AWWA C151 (ANSI A21.51) as further clarified
or excepted herein.
The ductile iron pipe shall be manufactured with a metal having
a tensile strength of 60,000 p.s.i., yield strength of 42,000 p.s.i.
and a 10% elongation (60-42-10). The thickness class of ductile
iron pipe shall be adequate for the internal working pressures,
external loads, and laying conditions as shown on the plans, and
unless specifically provided for otherwise on the Plans or in the
Proposal and/or Project Specifications shall be not less than that
required for an internal working pressure of 200~s.i. and for
installation with 5-feet of cover in laying condition ItAII, flat
bottom trench with untamped backfill computed in accordance with
the latest edition of AH\~JA C-150 (ANSI A21.50) "Thickness Design
of Ductile-Iron Pipe", nor shall the thickness be less than the
minimum thicknesses tabulated below:
Nor~ I NAL D IANET ER MINIMUr~ HALL MINIMUM THICKNESS
- OF PIPE (INCH) THICKNESS (INCH) CLASS
3 0.25 51
4 0.26 51
6 0.25 50
8 0.27 50
10 0.29 50
12 0.31 50
14 0.33 50
16 0.34 50
18 0.35 50
20 0.36 50
24 0.38 50
Ductile iron pipe shall be furnished with nominal laying lengths
of 18-feet, with permissible shorter random lengths as specified
in AW~IA CIS!.
All ductile iron pipe shall have a "Standard'Thickness" cement
mortar lining and bituminous seal coat over the cement mortar
lining in accordance with latest edition of AWWA CI04 (ANSI A21.4).
Ductile iron pipe shall have a bituminous "Standard Outside
Coating" of either coal tar or asphalt base in accordance with
the latest edition of AWWA Cl06 (ANSI A21.6).
-
R 01/28/74
Page 63
All ductile iron pipe joints shall conform to the latest edition of
AW\~A Cll! (ANSI A21.11) and may be either Ut1echanical Joint" or
"Push Onn type at the Contractor's option unless specifically stat
otherwise in the Project Specifications. Bolts scheduled for use
with mechanical joints shall be of carten type steel (IIUsalloyll) or
other approved, corrosive resistant material which is cathodic to
the pipe.
Ductile iron pipe and fittings shall be wrapped with polyethylene
as hereinafter specified in the Proposal and/or Project Specifications
4.3 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe in sizes 6" through 12"
nominal I.D. shall conform to the latest edition of AWWA C900
pressure class 150, (DR 18), or pressure class 200, (DR 14), as
further clarified or excepted herein.
The PVC pipe shall have ring joints (flexible elastomeric seals)
as recommended by the pipe manufacturer and shall bear the seal
of approval (or IINSFII mark) of the National Sanitation Foundation
Testing Laboratory for potable water pipe. Pipe and fittings must
be furnished with non-toxic lubricant.
~
PVC pipe shall be furnished with standard laying lengths of 20
feet with permissible shorter random lengths as specified in
A\~1\~A C900. Bedding conditions shall be as specified in Paragraph
16 (A) (1) of the Trenching and Backfill specifications.
The class of PVC 1120 pipe shall be adequate for internal working
pressures, external loads, and bedding conditions as shown on the
Plans, and unless specifically provided otherwise on the Plans or
in the Proposal and/or Project Specifications, shall be not less
than that required for an internal working pressure of 150 psi
for installation with 3 feet of cover in an embedment which shall
conform v/ith Class uB" as detailed in ASCE Manual No. 37, or with
the recommended practices given in ASTM 0-2321 and computed as
specified in Appendix A, Section A3.1, of AWWA C900.
The dimensions and pressure classes pennitted for Dimension Ratio
(DR) for PVC 1120 pipe with ductile iron pipe equivalent OD1s
a re shown be 1 0\'/:
NOMINAL PRESSURE DR AVERAGE MINIMUM WALL
SIZE CLASS OD THICKNESS
(INCH) (PSI) ( INCH) ( INCH)
6 150 18 6.900 0.383
6 200 14 6.900 0.493
8 150 18 9.050 0.503
8 200 14 9.050 0.646
10 150 18 11.100 0.617
10 200 14 11.100 0.793
12 150 18 13.200 0.733
12 200 14 13.200 0.943
Page 63a
e
Taps for service connections shall be made at locations approved by
the City and the tap shall be made using a bronze service clamp with
double strap, and no more than one (1) service tap shall be made
with each service clamp.
e
e
Page 63b
4.4 Fittin s for Ductile Iron and pve Water Distribution Pi e shall be
ductile iron conforming to AW1~A CllO-71 ANSI A21.10-1971) designed
for a working pressure of not less than 150 p.s.i. nor less than
the design pressure of the pipe in which they are installed.
All cast iron fittings shall have a "Standard Thickness" cement
mortar lining and bituminous seal coat over the cement mortar
lining in accordance with AWWA CI04-71 (ANSI A21.4-1971). Ductile
iron fittings shall have a bituminous "Standard Outside Coating"
of either coal tar or asphalt base in accordance with AWWA CI06-70
(ANSI 20.6-1970).
Unless provided for otherwise on the Plans or specified otherwise
in the Proposal and/or Project Specifications, fittings for direct
burial underground shall have joints which are either of the
IIr~echanical" or "Push On" type manufactured in accordance with the
requirements of A\~HA C111-72 (ANSI A21.11-1972); and where such
buried fittings cannot feasibly be restrained by concrete blocking,
the Contractor shall provide other means to prevent joint separation.
Fittings installed in exposed locations shall have joints flanged
with ASA 125 lb. flanges unless noted otherwise, or if installed
\~ith pipe rated greater than 150 p.s.i. working pressure, flanges
shall be rated equal to or greater than the design working pressure
of the pipe.
,
Gaskets shall be flRainbow", IIDurable Garlock", or approved equal.
Gaskets eight (8") inch diameter shall be 3/32" thick unless speci
cally required otherwise by individual job requirenlents.
Bolts shall be of "Cor-Ten" type IIUsalloyU or other approved cor-
rosion resisting material with American Standard Heavy Unfinished
Hexagonal Heads and the nuts shall be American Standard Heavy
Unfinished Heaxagonal dimensions as specified in American Standard
for Wrench Head Bolts and Nuts and Wrench Openings (A.S.A. B 12.2-
1941). All bolts or bolt-studs, if used, and all nuts shall be
threaded in accordance with American Standards or Screw Threads
(A.S.A. 81.1-1935). Coarse-Thread Series Class 2 Fit.
4.5 Gate Valves which are to be installed at locations shown on the
plans shall conform to the requirements of A.W.W.A. C500-71,
"Gate Valves - 3 In. through 48 In. - For Water and Other Liquids",
except for the changes and additions specifically outlined below.
Unless specifically provided for otherwise on the Plans or specified
in the Proposal and/or Project Specifications, gate valves shall
be of the double-disc, parallel seat internal wedging, non-rising
stem, cast iron body and bronze mounted type "designed for 200 p.s.i.
working pressure 400 p.s.i. test pressure, in sizes 2" through
1211 and 150 p.s.i. working pressure, 300 p.s.i. test pressure, in
sizes 1411 through 48".
All gate valves, unless otherwise shown on the plans or specified
shall be installed in a vertical position.
Page 64
e
Valves shown in the plans or specified to be installed horizontally
in horizontal pipelines, shall be equipped with gearing, grease
case, track, roller and scraper mechanism that will function properly
to local conditions equal to not less than two and one-half times
the maximum design conditions required for the valve without failure
of any nature.
The operating nut shall be 2" square. To open the valve, the
operating nut shall be turned to the left (counter clockwise)
whether the operating nut is located directly on the valve stem
or not.
Unless specifically provided for otherwise on the Plans or specified
in the Proposal and/or Project Specifications, the Contractor shall
have the option of furnishing valves with any of the following
joint types or combinations thereof:
1. Push-on joint
2. Mechanical joint
3. Flange joint to match connecting flanges
4. Concrete pipe joints to match the specific concrete
pipe manufacturer1s pattern for gasket joints on
which it ;s to be installed.
e
In addition to the above general requirements, gate valves shall be
designed so that when closing or opening the valve, the discs
move freely with the wedging mechanism in a collapsed position, thus
eliminating abrasive action between the seat rings and the disc
rings.
To eliminate deflection of the valve discs, seating force resulting
from the wedging mechanism shall be applied equally and at four
separate contact points on the back side of each disc.
The stem seal for all gate valves shall consist of an "O"-ring
type packing. Lubrication of the thrust collar shall be accom-
plished by means of a lubricant sealed between two "O"-rings.
Seat rings shall be screwed into the valve body. The disc rings
shall be pressed or rolled into the discs in an approved manner.
Both seat rings and disc rings shall be of bronze and shall make
an absolutely watertight joint.
The threads on the bronze stem shall be Acme threads. The stem for
valves, size 16" and smaller, shall be made from rolled bronze rod
with the collar formed by a forging operation. Stems for valves
18" and larger may be made from rod or casting.
e
Page 64a
Unless specifically shown on the Plans or specified otherwise,
all horizontal gate valves and vertical gate valves 18" and
larger shall be equipped with gears. Cut-tooth steel gears having
a factory lubricated enclosed gear case of the UExtended Typell
shall be furnished.
Unless specifically shown on the Plans or specified otherwise,
gate valves 16" and larger shall be equipped with non-rising stem
type by-pass valves.
When specifically shown on the Plans or specified in the Proposal
and/or Project Specifications, geared gate valves shall be equipped
with a "position indicator" to show the position of the gate in
relation to the ports.
All external bolts and nuts shall be made from a corrosion-
resistant material which is cathodic to the valve body.
Extension stems of sufficient length to bring the operating
nut up to within one foot (I') of the surface of the ground shall
be provided when the operating nut on the gate valve or by-pass
valve is three feet (31) or more beneath the surface of the ground.
All iron castings; bonnet, body, discs, etc., shall be made from a
superior quality of iron. Iron shall be tough and of even grain
and shall possess a tensile strength of not less than 31,000 p.s.i.
..
All bronze castings, except the stem, shall have a tensile strengt~
of not less than 30,000 p.s.i. All stems shall be made from bronz;._
having a tensile strength of not less than 60,000 p.s.i.
In addition to the detailed specifications, above, all gate valves
furnished for underground installation shall comply in all respects
to the A.merican \'later Works Specifications, and shall be Mueller
or approved equal. Valve keys shall be furnished only if specifically
called for in the "Special Provisions" or "Proposal".
Valves installed in exposed locations shall generally comply with
the above requirements, except with flanged joints and other special
details as shown on the plans or in the Special Provisions.
4.6 Cast Iron Valve Boxes and Covers shall be provided for the
complete installation of the gate valve and by-pass valve. The
boxes shall be installed as shown on the details included herein.
Adjustment to final grade and pouring the concrete base block where
required shall be included in the price bid for valve and boxes.
4.7 Fire Hydrants shall be of proper length for 36" cover on mains
unl ess spec; fically sho\'/n otherwi se and shall have one (1) 4~1I
pumper nozzle and two (2) 2~u hose.nozzels, national std. threads.
Fire hydrants shall open counter clockwise and shall be manufactured
in strict compliance with the latest specifications as approved
by the American Water Works Association. In additiont other design
Page 65
e
5. Construction Methods shall be as set forth following herein and in
event a situation occurs, not covered by this specification, the requirements
set forth in At~\'IA Standards C60Q-77, "Installation of Gray and Ductile Cast Iron
Water Mains" and C90Q-75-A6, fllnstallation of pve Water Pipe" shall govern.
5.1 Receiving, Unloading and Distribution of Materials: All pipe,
special castings, gate valves, fire hydrants, and other fittings
may be delivered by the Contractor on sidings or team tracks at
available points, as near the work as practicable. Should
switching charges be lawfully demanded by the railroads, the Con-
tractor will pay any such charges incurred.
All pipe, special castings, gate valves, valve stems, etc., shall be
carefully examined by the Contractor before unloading, and the atten
tion of the Engineer and the Agent of the Railroad called to breaks
cracks, or other defects. A certificate of acknowledgement of def~'.
where such defects are caused by transportation, a receipt signed
by the Agent of the Railroad with authorization to do so, shall be
taken by the Contractor. All materials shall be unloaded at the
Contractor's risk.
e
All pipe, special castings, gate valves and fire hydrants shall be
lifted by tackle not skidded or dumped off cars and trucks. No
dumping or other rough handling will be permitted.
All pipe and other material shall be transported to site of trench
and distributed in such manner as to be convenient for laying and
placed in such a manner as to afford as little inconvenience to
the public as possible.
,
Cost of unloading, transporting, trucking and distribution of
materials shall be included in the unit prices bid for material in I
place, it being intended that no separate price be paid for any
unloading, transporting or distribution of material.
5.2 Pipe Laying: All pipe, castings, valves and fire hydrants shall be
thoroughly cleaned of all dirt and trash before lowering into the
trench. Pipe and appurtenances shall be lowered into the trench
by derrick, crane, side boom or other means capable of completely
lifting the pipe --- not dumped or rolled in by ropes. Before
lowering, and preferably while suspended, pipe shall be rung with
a light hammer to detect cracks or flaws and shall be carefully
examined to see that the inside of the pipe ;s clean. After lower-
in the trench and before "stabbing home", the interior and outside
of the pipe joint shall again be cleaned of any dirtt mud, or other
foreign matter. Each joint of pipe shall be swabbed while suspende
in air.
During the process of sterilizaton of the intalled pipe, as specifi
herein, should the newly installed, lines produce excessive mud or
other foreign matter or rail to produce the calculated discharge
quantity, the Contractor shall pay the full cost of such cleaningt
removing sections of pipe for inspection or installing cleanouts
4IÞ as may be required to correct the situation.
Page 67
service connections as covered by separate detailed specifications.
No other types of small diameter pipes and fittings will be used
in the system except with specific approval of the individual in-
stallation.
4.11 Polyethylene Wrapping of Water Lines: Polyethylene wrapping for
ductile iron water mains shall consist of a thin tubular section
of polyvinyl plastic, which has a high dielectric and tensile
strength, for use in insulating the pipe from the electrolytic
action encountered in highly active soils.
Polyethylene wrapping shall consist of opaque polyvinyl sheet
continuously thermal bonded to form a tubular section. The tubes
may be supplied in bulk length on rolls; however, when supplied in
specific pipe lengths, the tubes shall contain a minimum of three
(3') feet over the actual pipe length to allow for overlap.
The polyvinyl sheet of film for the tubular wrapping shall be of
virgin polyethylene, as produced from DuPont Alathon Resin or
U.S.!. Petrothene Resin or equal. The material shall be of an
8 mil uniform film thickness and be free of imperfections such as
pin holes, etc., after being thermally seamed into tubular form.
Tape for use in conjunction with the installation of the poly-
ethylene wrapping shall be Polyken No. 900 (polyethylene), Scotchrap
No. 50 (Polyvinyl), or equal. Tape shall have a minimum thick-
ness of 10 mils with a maximum thickness consistent with a pliable
installation.
The polyethelyene material shall have no volatile constituents,
the loss of which may affect ductility. The material shall also
have the following properties:
(a) Mechanical: The polyethylene film shall have a tensile
strength of 1200 - 2500 psi, with an elongation of up to 600%.
(b) Dialetric: The film shall have a dieletric strength of
500 to 850 volts per mil thickness.
(c) Chemical: The film shall be chemically inert, with a moisture
absorption rate less than .01%. in 24 hours.
Page 66a
e
e
e
,i'
." ....-
, .
maintenance and operation of the system. These
:valves shall be '''Muel1er''t or approved equal.
3. Standard three-waYt improved typet dry head fire
hydrants constructed to provide a minimum of three
(31) feet of cover over the connecting main shall
be installed at locations such that all areas..of.
development are located within' a five hundre~ foot
(500') radius from a fire hydrant.; These hydrants
s.ha 11 be uMuell ert~, or approved .equð 1 .
4. All fire hydrants shall be installed with a cutoff
, valve and shall be served by a six inch (6") or
larger Supply or Dîstribution Main.
5. Four' inch (411) Distribution Mains shall be cast
iron pipe and it shall not be used' to serve more
than t\-Ienty (20) Standard 3/411 Service Connections
of ten (10) Double 3/411 Service Connections and
no 4.11 Oi s tri but ion Ma ins sha 11 exceed one thous- ,
and feet (1 tOOO a) in 1 ength between di rect connec- ~'
,tions to larger mains.
6. Mains Six inches (6U) and larger shall be cast iron
or a~hp~tnc:: Lement in accordance with the Standard--
-Specifications.' ,
. 7. All Supply Mains and Distribution Mains installed
within a Developer's 'platted and filed area of
development must extend to the borders of his
development as required for future extension of
the Cityts system, regardless of whether or not such
extensions are required for service within the
area of development.
..' :
-
I
... ~
'. -
~,.
, ::..
J ...
;1
!
f'... - ..,. '-
.-
t:
þ
; '.
~,' ,
"
- '
'"~/
~
R 9-23-74 4
R-ll/28/77
Page 30
/
,.-
15
1, :, '1
, - -
:, ' ~ .
'"
,. .
.i
.. '--....
-: ---. '.
: .
.~" .-\. .......
!"
",--' ;
~ ~ ~ .A' '1:) ,øa
~1~;:~ ~r- {,;i l.((.·~.,... þ;:
~~ '&- æ ~:;::, ~\\
r" ~ø t!I ;~. ~ /;~ ~ ~~"\ ~ ,~ 1$.2*"··..
;(!~ J"'~~ ~,..t" 'i]5¡i~çl :~Í:;,O~". ~ /{I 1, . ,~'~,1 ~'";7i
[. :ì:;:;iK.....,..~, 0r.·~.·._ ~,.. ....Ds· F~ . ":-'" · ~1 ~ ~ .'. . ~:; "';- ~f .~ ."
i;li'~'':D i I .1;{~'J':;:)'!å ~ ,;~ ~ ", ç1~>;
~ ;..;:~~ ~~;<. ....il fJ
,
e
8.
Water system extensions and improvements shali.be
designed in 2.ccordance 'tli th 111aster 'lié..ter arid Se~er
Plan.
c. SEViERAGE SY3TEr.'! DESIGN AI'¡D COI~STRUCTIOI'; STj...ltDARDS.
e
1. All mat~rials and workmanship used in extensions or
improvements to tÌle City' s se~vere,ge system s}lall con-
form to the latest revisions oÎ the applicable sec-
tions of the American Society of Testing Materials
St~~dards as prescribed in the latest revision of
the·Deta.iled Specifications which have beer. adopted
by the Ci ty; a. copy of \'.hici1. is on file at the offices
of the City and ~ill be m~de available for inspection
upon request. All installations shall conform to tne
latest applic~ble Design Criteri& for Sewerage Systems
as published by the Texas State Dep&rtment·of,Health.
2 . Appro2.ch Sewers ,shall be . designed \o\i·tlr con.sid~ration
for serving the f-ull 'drainage area subj ec't to ,collec-
tion by the system, but modified as governed by the
projected rate of development and ttle financié41'
feasibility of the proposed extension. Lateral Se~ers
shall be designed· to serve the planned area of
development with provision for,:extension V\.here .poss-
ible into adjacent undeveloped areas.
"The population density for undeveloped &reas shall
be ,based on .surro-unding development, but 811£11 not
be less then 9.S·persons per 2cr~ unless approved
'other'wise by the. Gi ty. The contributing sewage flow
shall be determined on the basis of an average flow
of 100 gallons per person per day wit.üout sepê;.;.ra.te
provision for infiltration. Outr~ll Sewers, Approach
Sewers and Collector Sewers shall be designed on the
basis of the following pe&king factor forrnulà:
.Peaking Factor = 1 + 14
4 +
.' ..
- V p-""
P = Popule. tion expressed. in·· thousands.
. ,
3. All Lateral SeV\ers-~o!' Sewer Mains installed within
a Developer'spletted and filed &rea of development
must extend to the borders of his development as
required for future extensions of the collecting
system regardless of v/heti1er or not sue}1 extensions
are requi,red for service vii thin tIle development.
e
4. Detailed determination of the ·sani tary se.......erage e.rea
shall be the responsibili ty of trie Ci ty. ·~·.here. t!lere
Page 31
R-
1
11
I':
i
I
I
f
í
I
. I
. k
f
,
i
I
I
!
t.
i-:
('?
k
f
~
f
i
~
~
~
,V
~
f.
I
I
I
I
w
I
~
I
I
I
Þ'
~
I
I
~
~
''f
~
11. The follo~jng design practices shall be considered_
as generally applicable, but they may be modified by
concurrence of the City's Engineer (5) and Director in
specific cases where they are impractical.
No sewers other than Service Sewers and House Sewers
shall be less than six (6") inches in diameter.
Service Sewers and House Sewers shall not be less
than four (4") inches in diameter arid shall approach
the "Lateral Sewer" on' at least a one (1%) per cent
grade.
'. . .
A 11 La tera 1 and Approach Sewers s ha 11 b'e des i gned wi th
hydraulic slopes sufficient to give mean velocitiest
when flowing full or half-full of, not less than two
(2.0') feet per second based on' Kutter's .. .
or Manning's formula using an un" valve of 0'.013.
'Grades which will produce velocities in excess of
five (Sf) feet" per second shall be avoided.
Sewers shall be laid in straight alignment wherever
possi'ble. Where horizontal curvature must be used,
the smallest radius shall be one hundred (1001) feet.
Manholes shall be'constructed at all changes in
alignment, grade or size of sewer intersection of ,
other sewers except Service Sewers and at the ends
of all sewer lines that will be extended. Inter-
secting sewers shall enter the manholes at the
crown line or top, of the intersettion or main sewer
and the inverts of all manholes shall be formed
concave to fit the connecting sewer pipes.
12. All six (6") inch and eight (B"), inch sewer lines
shall be air tested and hold four (4) P.S.I. for
twenty (20) minutes. All ten (10")" inch and larger
sewer mains shall hold three~3) P.S,.!. for fifteen
(15) minutes. . "
R-l1/28/77
Page 34
e
Item
Trenchinq and OackfiJ1
such usage. All necessary precautions sha11 be tÐkcn by the Contractor, and prov-
isions shall be mûde for the protection of the new work, and DJ1 blðsting shall be
so conducted as not to cndnngcr persons or property. Only ù sufficient quùntity of
explosIves for the immediate düy1s work shû11 be kept at the site of the work by
the Contractor. CðpS. exploders ûnd explosives shall be stored separately. The
Contractor shû11 be responsib1e for, and ShÐ11 mùke good, Ðny dÐmage cûused by
blasting or ~ccJdental explosions.
12.
Tunnel1inq and C~sing.
Tunnelling under hlghwÐYS, streets, or râilro~ds shall be accomplished
by menns of jccking and tunne11ing equipment which has been ~pproved prior to
starting tunnelling operations. Tunnels shall be pressure grouted or backfi11ed
,as completely as prûcticûb1e with se1ccted mÐteria1s, compacted by means of mechan-
ical t~mpers or hydraulicðlly p1ðced in such manner that no voids remain between
the backfi11ed material and the roof of the funne1. Tunnelling and casing shall be
further in ðccordùnce with the Item, IIRðilroad and Highway Crossings" or as
further provided in the Special Provisions or shown on the p1ans.
13.
Crossinqs to be Kept Open.
~
Ie
At such. street, raiJroad, and ð11 other crossings as mðy be designated
by the Engineer, th~ trenches arc to be h~nd tûmped and fi11ed in such a manner as
to prevent õny serious intcrruptiòn of traffic upon the roadway or sidcwa1ks, the
cost thereof to be born~ by the Contrnctor.
14.
Protection of Unfinished Work.
Defore leûving work for the night, or during Ð storm, or at other timc~
care must be tcken to protect Ðnd securely close the unfinished end of the pipe.
Any earth or other materip1s that mðy find entrûnce into the pipe through any such
open or unplugged end of the pipe must be removed at the Contractor's expense.
15.
lights ~nd Guards.
The Contrüctor must provide and maintQin ÐdcquÐte detours around the
work under construction. The Contractor must provide sufficient lights, warning
signs, and wÐtchmen to prQvide ÐdequÐte1y for the safety of the public.
16.
Cackfil1t Mûteriüls ðnd Workmanship.
ExcDvatio~ sha11 be bùckfil1ed only with approved materials; the type
of backfl11 sha11 vary ~ccordlng to the type of pipe beIng instal1ed.
(A) Unless special grênular embedment or encasement is required, the
initial b1indlng-over of the pipe sha11 be as fo11ows:
e
(1) Al1 asbestos cement pipe shõl1 be embedded and blInded
over with not 1ess thi)n L¡.tI be10tt1 & 4f1 ûbove the barrel
of pip~ with select Ith~uleJ-in" cushion sûnd. Materia1·
from the trench will not be used for cushion sand unless
the Contractor furnishes suttab1e reports from an rnd~-
pendent 1ðborDtory showing thût it has proper qua1itJes.
PAGE 58
(2)
Item
Trenchinq and Bùckfil1
A11 ~Dst iron or steel cy1indcr concrete pipe lÐid on rock
or in c1ny mQ~er¡Ð1 with P.I. of 20 or granter shal1 be em-
bedded ûnd b1 indcd ov~r with not less thon 4" below and 4"
ûbove bûrre1 'of pipe with se1ect I1Hûu1ed-inll cushion sand.
(3)
~5t iron-Qr steel cylinder concrete pipe 'ðid through
moteriùls of P.I. less thùn 20 which gr~nu1atc or crumble
to pûrtic1cs less thon 111 in size may be b1indcd ~nd bwck-
filled with the nôtive mûteri~1 un1ess some other condition
is found thût would be detrimcntûl to this instùl1ntion.
Embedding ûnd blinding must be not less thûn 4" below ûnd 411
ûbove borrel of pipe.
A11 c1ûy or other sewer pipe shüll be blinded znd b~ck-
filled with native mùteriûl where the cxcüvûtcd m~teriû1
is good cûrth free from rock, broken concrete, broken
pavement or other Jumpy mutcriûl 1Ðrgcr thûn 111 in the
9re~tast dimension. The pipe shot1 be blinded by carefully
p1ùcing by hand, ùnd hùnd or mechûnicÐl1y tamping layers to
û h~ight twelve (1211) inches ðbove the pipe.
(B) After initið1 blinding-over h~s been accomp1ished ûS specified
abovc, the remainder of the b~ckfi11 shðl1 be plÐccd ðnd treated
depending upon the locûtion of the trench ûS follows: .
(4)
(1) Where trenches ûrc 10cðted in open or undeveloped lùnd, ðnd
in land which h~s not been plÐnncd or plotted ðnd submitted
for review by the City PI~nnin9 Co~roission or City Council.
bÐckfil1 shùl1 be added to the trench to bring it up to
nûturÐ1 ground IÖvel. The ditch sh~11 then be allowed to
s2ttlc with Ðddition~l fill m~tcri~l ðddcd from time to time
ÐS nûturnl sett1ement is ûccomp1ished and unti1 al1 backfil1
hûs stabilized or the period of mÐinten~nce ûs prescribed
for the project hûs expired. "
(2) Where trenches ðre located in land for which ~ prc1iminÐry
p1Ðn has been or is being presented to the City Planning
Commission or City Counci1. the bÐckfi11 shall be jetted
unti1 Ql1 sett1cment h~s been ccûsed. Jets sholl be used
ût not over six ,'(6) foot spùcing and on i:11tcrnt3te sides
of the trench. After jetting ûnd prior to Ðny street con-
struction in the DreD planned, the ditches sha11 be thor-
oughly ·'walked inll by tracked mûchinery Ðnd ûny settlement
corrected by ùddition of mûtcriðl up to ground leve1.
(3) Where trenches Drc locÐted in ôrc~s dcdicùted ÐS streets in
Ð plût which is filed of record. these trenchcs,shalJ be
bûckfi11cd with' select moteriûl from trench cxcûvation and
this backfill shal1 be nÐnd or mcchanic~11y tamped in not
more thûn six (611) inch layers or hydrw-tûmped to minimum
90% density. If the m~teriÐI is dry, Ðnd if so instruct~,
the Contr()ctor shû11 moisten the bë:1c.kfil1 muteric:11 in order
~o obtôin sûtisfÐctory compû~tion.
(4) Where trenches are located in existing paved streets, a11
excòvûtcd mûteri~l shûll be removed from the site and the
full trench ôbove initiùl embedment fi11cd with crushed
stone or other ùpprovcd grùnular mðterÎ;)1 of a n:1turo thût
PA3~ 5~i
e
ITEM
~ATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
, -,
1.
Description.
:~ (:
. . This item covers the mater.ia1 and labor·required for the construction
of the water distribution system, or extensions to the existing system as shbwn on
the plans. Included are at) mains, laterals, valves, valve boxes and appurtenances
unless specifica11y covered by separate specification item.
.: ~t$é'rvice Connectionsll, IIRai1road and Highway Crossings" and other" .......
special devices and situati()ns win be covered by separate items. .',
. " . ~
. I
. . .
-- .
.. ,. .. . .
... ......
.. . .'. -This spcctfi.cation item may be amended or" adapt-edto the particular""
project by the "Special Provisions'l, ' .',.;. . '
2.
~xcavations 2nd.B2ckfi11in~.
. . ;". I ~_
~ .. t
An trenching and backfi1t shaTJ be accomp1ishedfln':conformì1:ywlth
the specification item, 'trrenching and Backfi nu, and the costs of furnishing- and
placing cushion sand or-other embedment ·material as required in Section 16 of the
''Trenching and'.B~ckfi 1lt'ttcm sha) I be "included in the installed price of each
size and type of pipe unless specifica1ty provtded otherwise in the "Special
P rov is i onstl an~:.·I'Ptoposa }I..
. .
3.
Select i on of P i~eTvpe.
All buried distribution system pipe used On this project shall be Cast
Iron, Asbestos Cement, or Copper suitable for working pressure of at least 150
· p.s.i., unless otherwise provided in the "Special Provisions" or shown on the
plans. The selection of pipe type for any given situation shat) be -govern.ed as .
fo1lows:
(a) A11 service Hnes 2" and smaller sha11 be Type ilK" copper.
/
(b) A11 distribution mains smal1er than nominal 6" 1.0. shaH be .
~and if smaller than 4H joint lengths shall not exceed
.,,·xsi.J2.feet,. nor shaJ I wal) thickness be less than 0.2511. .. '.
I" .;
(c)
A1t d tstr ibuti on ma Ins from namino 16&1 I.D. to -12~·1.0.
inelustve- sha-H be either cas.t iron or -asbestos c"ement..- at
-Contractor's option, with the type selected.to.:be:?stated in
the Proposa1. . . .. '!' '!-/;'
,~ ')
: .... '. "
, -'--
(d) Pipe larger. than nomina 1 12" r .D.. wi 11 be of type<seJected by'
the City based upon the individual circumstances>-;ofthe partìc-
u1ar job, involved. "~.¡' ;~~.
: .-... f' .
".øJ' ~. '.: !
)~; ~ '
. :.
Calva · n teet) plastic or other special types of pipe shall be
~sed only ~hen spocifical1y .approved and provide on e p aos or '" e peclat
Provisiol1s". ¡Wh~re more tha:1 one class of pipe is required. the location of the (
var i ous classes ,w"ï.ll be Sha.-ln on the plans. .. . t.
- .
~
-'.
PAGZ 62
'J
Item
Water Distribution System
4.
Materials Specifications.
,4.1 Copper Pipe shall be cold drawn seamless pipe and it shall con-
form with A.S.T.fw1. Class "AH.Spec· ·cation and U.S. Government Type uKu'Specifi-
cation and 'U.S. cw-ernment W-e, uK" pecifications .WW-T-799.
4. Cast Iron Pi ·n sizes smaller than 311 nominal 1.0. shall con-
fonm to AWWA C1 · siies 311 1.0. and larger shall conform to AWWA CI06-62
or CI08-62 as fu~t . - r excepted herein. .. ,
All Cast Iron Pip hall have standard thickness' cement mortar qining
in accordance wi AWW -64 and shall be coated outside with AWWA sta'ndard_
bituminous ~oati -
, .
.. ·èåst Iron Pipe ay be manufactured with metal having·tensilstrength
of 18,000 p.s.i. and mo us of rupture of 40,000 p.s.i. or the pipe'may be man-
ufactured, ." aving a tensil strength of 21,000 p.s.i~ and modulus of rup-
ture of 45~OOO p.s.i..
Thi~kness of ,the pipe shall be not less than is required for'an
internal working pressure of 150 p.s.i. and for installation with 3~ ft. of cover ~;'
in trench condition itA"" flat bottom trench with un-tamped backfil1~ computed in.-"'
accordance with A.S.A. A 21.1-1957, "Manual For The Computation of Strength and
Thickness of Cast Iron Pipe", nor shall, the thickness be less than the minimum
thickness tabulated as follows:
. . -
'Diam'eter of Pipe Min. Wall Thickness-Inch
'(I nch) 18/40 C.I. 21/45 C.l.
4 0.35 0.35
,6 0.38 0.35
8 0.41 0.38 ' ,
10 0.44 0.41
. ,12 " " 0.48 0.44
14 O~55 0.51
16 0.58 0.54
18 0.63 0'.58
Cast iron pipe joints shall conform to AWWA Clll-64 and may be either -ur4echanical
Jointl. or upush Onn type at on ctor·s option unless specifically stated other-'
wise in'the Spec· , · · '.,.-
~.3 Asbestos Cement Pi e shall conform to AWWA· C400-64T as herein
excepted or urther clarified. An fidavit of compliance shall be furnished in
accordance wit · ~ standard. Pipe class shall be for a working
pressure not less than 200 p.s.i. for 6" pipe and be,in standard 10 ft. or 13 ft.
lengths'. 8" and larger pipe shall be for a working pressure not less than 150
p.s.;. and be in standard 13 ft. lengths with 10% permissible shorter·random lengths ',':
allowed as per AWWA standards. . .
Asbestos-cement pipe couplings shall include an asbestos-cement sleeve,
of the same composition as the pipe, and two rubber rings. The couplings shall be
machined so as to insure a tight.joint with the pipe. The rubber rings u~ed to -seal
the joints shall conform to the requirements of the latest revision of ASTM 0 1859.
Page 63
e
~
Water Di~tr¡bution System
L}.4 Fittin Äsbestos Cement ~ter Distribution
Pipe shal1 be cast iron t \lWA 110-64 desi roCd for a working pressure
of not less than ISO p.~.i. nor s than the pressure of the pipe in which
they are insta11ecl. A11 f. Ings sha11 have ~IA standard bituminous outside
coatings ancl~ cement-mortar 1ioings.,
Fittings for direct burial underground shall have mechanica1 joints
and where such buried fittings cannot feasibly be restrained by concrete blocking
they shall be equipped with retainer glands or tic rods to prevent joint separa-
tion.
. '.
Fittings installcd in exposed locations sha11 have joints flanged with
ASA 125 lb. flanges unless noted otherwise, or if installed with pipe rated great-
er than 150 p.s.i. working pressure, flanges shall be rated equal to or greater
than the design working pressure of the pipe.
Gaskets shall be IIRainbO/JlI, IIDurable Garlock", or approved equal.
Gaskets eight (8") inch diameter and smaller shall be 1/16" thick; over eight (811)
inch diameter shall be 3/3211 thick unless specifical1y required otherwise by in-
dividual job requircm~nts.
e.
Do1ts shall have American Standard Heavy Unfinished Hexagonal Heads
and the nuts shalf be American Standard Heavy Unfinished Hexagonal dimensions a11
as specified in American Standard for \-Irench Head Bolts and Nuts and \-lren~h Open-
ings (A.S.A. B 12.2-1941). All bolts or bolt-studs, if used, anô all nuts shall
be threaded in zccordance with American Stanôard or Screw Threads (A.S.^. 81.1-
1935), Coarse-Thrca~ Series Class 2 Fit.
,
4~5 ,Gðte Valves shall open by turning left (counter clockwise) and
all valves installed underground in the distribution system shall be mechanical
joint, double disc, parallel seat type, and shall be iron body, bronze mounted;
designed for 200 p.s.i. working pressure, 400 p.s.i. tcst pressure in sizes 211
through 1211; and 150 p.s.i. working pressure, 300 p.s.i. test pressure in sizes
14" th rou~h !~,311.
In addition to the ~bove genera1 requirements, gate valves sha11 be
designed so that when closing or openIng the valve, the discs move freely with
the wedging mechenism in a collapsed position, thus eliminating abrasive action
between the seat rings and the disc rings.
To eliminate deflection or the vë:lve discs, seating force resulting
from the wedging mechenism shall be appl ied cqual1y and at four separate contact
points on the back side of each disc.
All gate valves shall be equipped with "Oil ring type packing_ Lubri-
cation of the thrust collar shall be accomplished by means of a special lubricant
sealcd between two "Oil rings.
e
'Seat rings shalt be screwed into the valve body. The disc rings shall
be pressed or rollcd into the discs in an approved mÙnner. Both seat rings and
disc rings shall be of bronze and shall make an absolutely watertight joint.
The threads on the bronze stem shal1 be Acme threads. The stem for
P j"GE 64
Item
Water Distribution System
va1vc-5. size 1611 and smat1er, sha11 be made from ro11ed bronze rod with the co11ar
formed by a forging operation. Stems for va1ve5 18" and larger may be made from
rod or casting.
All iron castings; bonnet, body, discs, etc., shall be made from a
superior quality of'iron. Iron shall be tough and of even grain and shall possess
a trensile strength of not less than 31,000 p.s.i.
All bronze castings, except the stem, sha11 have a tensi1e strength of
not less' than 30,000 p.s.i. A11 stems shal1 be made from bronze having a tensile
strength of not 1ess than 60,000 p.s.i.
In addition to the detai1ed specifications, above, all gate va1vcs
furnished for underground instal1ation shall comp1y in a1J respects to the
Amer i can ~late¡" "lorks Spec if ¡cat ions, .and sha J] be Hue J 1 er or approved equa 1.
Va1ve keys shall be furnished only if specifica11y callcd for in the "Special
Provisions" or "Proposa1".
Valves installed in exposed locations sha11 generally comply with the
above requirements, except with flanged joints and other special details as shown
on the p1ans or in the Special Provisions.
4.6 Boxes For Gate Vå1ves shal1 be furnished and installed on a11
valves as shown ón details included herein. Adjustment to final grade and pour-
ing concrete base b10ck where required shall be inc1uded in the price bid for
va1vcs and boxes.
L}.7 Fire Hydrants sha11 be of proper lcngth for 3611 cover on mains
un1ess specif'ica11y shov-Jn other\-Jisc and shall have one (1) 4t" pumper nozzle and
two (2) 2tll hose nozzc1s, national std. threads. Fire hydrants shall open counter
c10ckwisc and shall be manufactured in strict compliance with the 1atest specifi-
cations ~s approved by tne American Water ~Jorks Association. In addition, other
design features, as listed bc1cw shall be incorporated'n the manufacture of the
fire hydrants furnished under these sþecifications:
(a) Fire hydrants sha11 be of the compression type which close
with the pressure and shal1 be so designed as to provide for
two drain ports that are an intcgra1 part of the main vatve
assembly and work automatically when the hydrant is opcrûtad.
The main valve shall remain c10scd without 10ss of water in
the event of a traffic accident. Hydrants sha11 have 5-1/4'1
v.o.
(b) Fire hydrants shal1 be provided with a safety flange assembly,
located at a point approximately 2" above the ground line, and
shall consist of a tw'o piece stem and barrel and designed so
as to assure no breakage or damage to either the stem or upper
or 10wer barrc1 in the event of 'being accidentally struck by a
vehicle.
(c) Hydrants shall-be. of the dry top design with a11 working parts
and operating threads scaled away from the water in either the
open or c10scd position. "0" ring seal packing shall be used
--
PAGE 65
Item
Wat~r Distribution System
Crvice .connections as covered by !;Ùparût0 clctailcd spccificðtions. Bo other
pes of small di~mctcr pipes and fittinss wi)1 bc used in the system except with
specific approvû,1.of. the individuùl instDl1ation.
5. Construction "1cthods shðl1 be <:15 set forth fol1owin9 herein and in
event û situðtion occurst not covered by this specification, th~ requirements set
forth in Atf\~;'\ StandÐrds 0600-5L~T, "Instùl1ûtion of Cast Iron \l()t\;r mùins" ()nd
6603-61:·T» IIInstð11ation of Asbcs·tos-Ccmcnt \~atcr Pi~c" sha11 govern.
5.1 Rcc.9_iyingt Unloðdin.l~Dd_.D-'~_tIibution of ¡'\ütcriDls: AI J pipe,
spcciû1 castings, 9ûtc v~lvcs, fire hydr~nts, Ðnd other fittings may be dclivered
by the Contrùctor on sidings or tCùffi trÐcks at ~vcJi]"Ðblc points, ~s ncðr the work
as pr~cticûb1c. Should switching chùrgcs be 1ðv/fu11y dzmðndcd 'LJy the rûi 1ro.:tds,
the Contrûctor will pûy ~ny such chùrgcs incurred.
All pipct spec¡~1 castings, gate valves, vÐ1vc stems, etc., shal1 be
careful1y cx~mincd by the Contr~ctor before unloading, ~nd the ~ttention of the
Engineer ~nd the Agent of the Rðilroad cal1cd to brcùks, cracks, or other d~fùcts.
^ ccrtificÐt~ of acknowledgement of d~fcctsJ where such dcfccts arc cûuscd by
trÐnsportûtion, ~ receipt signed by the ^Jcnt of the Rûilroad with authorizDtion
to do so, sha11 be taken by the Contrûctor. ("\11 matcriÐ1s shal1 be unloðdcd é1t
the ContrÐctorJs risk.
A11 pipe, special c~stinssJ 9ôtc v~lvcs and fire hydr~nts shûl1 be
lifted by tÐck1c not sl~iddcd or dumped off CQrs ùnd trucks. I·!o dumping or other
~ugh hunul inJ wi 11 DC permitted.
~11 pipe and other ffiÐtcriù1 snwl1 Gc transported to site of trench ~nd
distributed in such mùnncr ~s to be convenient for lùying ~ncl p1accd in such Q
mûnncr as to ûfforcl DS little inconvcni~ncc to the public as possibic.
Cost of unlo~ding, trûnsporting, trucking ûnd distribution of mûteriÐls
shûl1 be included in the unit prices bid for m~teri~1 in p1ncc, it b~ing intended
thùt no scpûrêtc price be paid for any un1oûding, tr~n~?orting or distribution af
mÐtcrÎ<Jl.
5.2 Pipe lÐyin~: [.11 pip'.2, cûstings, vwlvcs ~nd fire hydrants shi:111 bL'
thoroughly c1cûncd of ûJ1 dirt~nd trûsh Defore 101J~r¡n9 into the trench. Pipe ûnd
appurtcn~ncc~ sh~11 be 10wcrcd into the trùnch by d~rrick, cri3nc, side boom or
other mCùns cûpaJlc of compl~tcly 1iftins the pipe - ~ - not dumped or ro11cd in
by ropes. ßcforc 1owcring, Ðnd prcfcrûb1y whi1c suspended, pipe shall "be rung
with ~ I ight h~mmcr to detect crêcI~s or flû\\'s and sh()11 b~ cùrcfuì ly cxnf'!1inGd to
see thðt the insid~ of the pipe is clc~n. After towering in the trench ûnd
before "stûbbing homell, the interior éJnd outside of the pipe joint shû11 ¿)gûin be
clcaned of Ðny dirt, mud, or other foraign matter. EQch joint of pipe sh~11 be
sw~bbed whilû suspended in air.
During the process of sterilization of th~ instû11cd pipe, ë)S specified
herein, should the nC'W1y instê)11cd lines produce excessive mud or other fore:.ÎÇ)n,
mêttcr or r~i1 to produce the cû1cu1~tcd djsch~rgc qu~ntitYJ the Contrãctor shall
.ay the full cost of such clc~nin9, r~nloving suctions of pipe for insp~ct¡on or
~stðl1¡n9 clcanouts ðS mùy bc required to correct the situ~tion.
PAGE 67
df
DATE: 12/3/80
e
SUBJECT:
Garbage Ordinance
e
DEPARTMENT: City ~1anaºer
BACKGROUND: A possibility exists that some residents in our city are
requiring trash service, but for one reason or another, not being billed.
This is costinq the contractor and the city money. Other cities require
new water customers ta sign up for trash disposal service. Individuals
currently not payin~ nor utilizing this service will not be required to
sign up for this service.
Items 3 and 4 of ·this ordinance pertain to commercial collection. This
ordinance elirninates '\vill calll' service and requires commercial firms to
establish }~outine collection service.
This ordinance will help our billing procedures and prevent loss of revenue
to the city and the contractor.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve or deny the ordinance
BUDGETED ITEt~:
YES N/A NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
~--------~------~-~----~----~~----~--~----~------~--~-----~--~~~--~----~-----~-
-
ORDINANCE NO. ~ \Q~/
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O'F NO'RTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1 .
Each person, firm or corporation applying for new water service
from the city shall be required to sign an application for trash and
disposal service and shall be required to pay the monthly charge for such
service.
2.
Any person who shall fail or refuse to pay for charges within
fifteen (15) days from the date of any bill containing an arrears balance
shall have his water service as well as all other city billed services
suspended.
3.
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to
allow trash or garbage to accumulate to the extent that it over-flows
from that person's receptacle, or to allow such garbage or trash to
accumulate and stand when such trash or garbage emits an odor objection-
able to a person of ordinary sensibilities.
4.
In order to insure that the above section is not violated
by commercial customers, the garbage co'nt-ractor s'ha11 -make a determination
as to the type and size of receptacle and the interval between pickups.
In the event the commercial customer feels that the contractor's
determination is excessive then said customer shall have the right
to appeal the decision of the contractor to the City Manager of the
City of North Rich1and Hills or his designated representatìve. After
hearing the contr,oversy on the facts between the contractor and customer,
the said City Manager, or his designated representative~ shall make a
determination as to the type and extent of service to be provided to
the customer.
Passed and approve this____day of
, 1980.
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
SET
DATE: 12/3/AO
SUBJECT: Puhlic hearing on anna.aLion of property
DEBARMENT: City Manager
BACKGROUND: This item refers to establishinn new boundaries with Haltom City
Rex McEntire will present at the council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Public hearing
BUDGETED ITEP1: YES N/A NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
¡
'"' I
~ '~;~.1' ~t;! '</~rl r~-1Yure /0 ~f)o ~l ~/rl ~(;I i-£H': "
~ J - j ''I 0 P 1- J )- \ ~ -j U J 'J J c; J - r J
Please Publish - November 19, 1980
POOLI C NorI CE
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of City of
Haltom City, Texas, intend to annex property and to disannex
property and the City of North Riehland Hills, Texas, intend
to annex property and to disannex property so that the present
boundary line between the t~D cities ~TIere it presently
intersects \~th the south right-of-~~y line of the Southwestern
Railroad south to a point where said line interesects the
prope rt')7 of \V. BrO\Vll Custom Builder, Ine. (also kno\vn Tarrant
Real Estate Company, Inc.) shall be rroved to establish the
common line dO~TI the center of Big Fossil Creek to a point in
the north right-of-way line of Southwestern Railroad, thence
easterly and northerly along the north and \vest right-of-wa)7 line
South\vestern Railroad property to the intersection \vi th the south
right-of -\vay of U. S . High\vay 820, thence \\est to the present
North Richland llills and Haltom City limits line.
All interested persons may appear at a public hearing before
the City Council of the City of Hal tom City, Texas, on the 20th
day of November, 1980, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chrumbers, City
Hall, Haltom City, Texas.
All interested persons may appear at a public he~ring before
the Cit)7 Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on
the 8th day of December, 1980, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers,
City Hall, North Richland Hills, Texas.
5024 BROADWAY AVE.· HALTOM CITY. TEXAS· P. O. BOX 14246· 76117
Public Notice - Annexation
Page 2
Novanber 7, 1980
The proposed annexations and deannexations shall not effect the
mvnership of any easement over, under, and through any of the land
involved.
SIGNED TIllS 6TIl Di\Y O~F NO\TE1Y1BER, 1980.
;Ctv<¿
y Secretary, City 0
exas
vJ)
City Secretary, City of Haltom Cit~7, Texas
e
'e
e
~~
DATE:
12/3/80
SUBJECT:
Traffic Engineering Survey Program
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: The State Department of Hi9hways and Public Transportation
requires a resolution specifying the names of individuals who serve as
Project Director and Authorized Representative of the City in connection
with the state funded "Traffic Engineering Survey Program.
This resolution apPQints Allen Bronstad as Project Director and
Charles Williams as Authorized Representative.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve or deny resolution
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES N/A NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
~-~-~~--~~-----~-~------------------~~~--~---~------------~-~-~---~--~--~~~----
THE STATE OF TEXAS ~
COUNTY OF TARRANT ~
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~
RES 0 L UTI 0 N NO. fJJ- '3 7
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of North Richland Hills to
participate in the Tra.ffic Engineering Survey Program \.¡;th the Office of
Traffic Safety;
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills will follo'll the recom-
mendations of the Consultant when such recommendations are practical and
within the financial capabilities of the City of North Richland Hills;
WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the City of North
Richland Hills to appoint Utility Director~ 'Allen Bronstad ,
as Project Director and it would' be in the best lnterest that City Manager,
Charles W. Williams be appointed Authorized Representative of the
City of North Richland Hills;
THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that the City Commission of the
City of North Richland Hills authorizes and directors Charles W. Williams -
Authorized Representative to make the necessary Contract Application to
enter into and participate in the Traffic Engineering Survey Program
with the Office of Traffic Safety.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS
DAY OF
,1980.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BY:
MAYOR
(Name and Title)
ATTEST:
(Name and Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAILITY
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
- ---,.. ..., ,#~~'- ,-
.'~"" ;/: .
/"."
4IÞ SUBJECT:
d7
DATE: 11-19-80
--------
Propert~_Qrd i, nance___________________________,________
. ø
------------.---.------
DEP ARTfv1ENT:
Police.
BACKGROUND:
The City has no ordinance regarding the disposition of
__________________~to ~n_~~_overe~~__~~~~oned_~_~~_!5?_~_~pr~2~ rtL~~~~-~--------
possession of the Police Department.
----.--.-
The attached ordinance is needed to provide a legal
-------.------------------------ --------------------.----
basis regarding this procedure. Euless and Fort Worth
--------------..
ordinances were reviewed and considered in the preparation
-------.-----
--------_._----
of this ordinance.
-.------.-----------------..------ -.--- ------------------_._---~- ---.--------------------------.-.-.---.---
----------------.-----.--.-...-------------------------------.----.-...-.-
4IÞ
-.--.-.-... --_.._------------_.~-_._-------_._---- ._---_._~- .--_.--_._---_._--_.--_._------------------_.--~ .--.---.--..--
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Consideration for approval
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES N/A
NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e
#' " -
e
ORDINANCE NO.~
An ordinaace providing for the disposition of stolen recovered property,
abandoned property, and found property, other than motor vehicles, in
the possession of the Police Department; providing a Saving Clause, pro-
viding a Penal Clause, directing publication; and naming an effective
date.
Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas:
ARTICLE 1.
Disposition of Stolen Recovered, Abandoned, and Found
Property.
SECTION 1. All stolen property, abandoned, and found property of
every kind, except motor vehicles, which shall remain
unclaimed with the Police Department for a period of
thirty (30) days and which is not being held as evidence
in a pending criminal case,without being claimed or re-
claimed by the owners, whether known or not, may be sold
at public auction, appropriated to the City's use, or
destroyed, as required by law.
e
SECTION 2. The Chief of Police shall give to the City Secretary a
list of all property subject to sale hereunder and
shall thereafter deliver such property to the City
Secretary before the date of sale and take a receipt
from such City Secretary showing in detail all property
so delivered.
SECTION 3. Thirty days notice of the time and place of sale of all
property to be offered for sale and a descriptive list
of the property to be offered for sale shall be posted
at the door of the Tarrant County Northeast Sub-Court
House and at any regular entrance to the North Richland
Hills City Hall and a copy thereof sent by registered
mail to the last known address of the owner, if the name
of such owner is known to the City Secretary. Thereafter,
such property shall be offered for sale at public auction
to the highest bidder. Such property may be sold as
individual items, or assembled in lots, at the discretion
of the City Secretary. Provided however, that the head
of any department of the City of North Richland Hills may
request, in writing, that any items offered or to be
offered for sale be assigned to his or her department.
The City Secretary may, at his or her discretion, assign
such item or items to such department or sell such items
at public auction_
e
SECTION 4. The public auction provided for in the preceding section
shall be conducted at the place and hour designated in
the notice, all sales shall be for cash.
SECTION 5. The City Secretary shall conduct such public auction and
shall keep an accurate statement of each article sold and
the price bid and paid there for, and shall make a complete
report in writing to the Finance Director of the time,
place, and manner of conducting such sale. All funds
received on account of such auction shall be delivered
to the Finance Director who shall give his or her receipt
therefor.
SECTION 6. The Finance Director shall place all funds received by
him or her under and by virtue of this Chapter to the
credit of the General Fund, to be thereafter disbursed
as the City Council shall order.
SECTION 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this Chapter
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. In addition to
the penalties otherwise provided, any officer or employee
of the City violating any provision of this Chapter shall
forfeit his office or employment.
SECTION 8. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, or phrase
of this ordinance is held for any reason to be invalid,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the re-
maining portion of this Code.
SECTION 9. Any person violating any of the provlslons of this ordi-
nance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall
be punished by a fine not to exceed two hundred ($200.00).
SECTION 10. The City Secretary is hereby directed to publish the
caption, penalty clause and effective date of this ordi-
nance for five (5) days in the newspaper of genreal
circulation in the City of North Richland Hills.
SECTION 11. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after the date of its passage and publication as
required by law and it is so ordained.
e
e
e
d.?
D,L\TE: 12/3/80
Resolution - Removal and disconnect unauthorized street cuts on
Rufe SnOVJ Dri ve
DEPARTMENT: City Manager
BACKGROUND: Resolution will authorize City Manager to correct and relieve
drainage problems and to remove and disconnect existing street cuts into
Rufe Snow Drive which have been authorized by the City.
SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny Resolution
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES N/A NO
ACCOUNT NUr~BER:
~----------~--~---~---~--~--~~-~~---~-~-~--~---~--~~---------~---------~-------
RESOLUTION NO.
fb
%\j -~
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that certain
drainage problems exist on Rufe Snow Drive north of Loop 820
which can be corrected or relieved within the existing right of
way.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT Resolved by the City Council of
the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1 .
The City Manager is authorized and directed to correct and
relieve the said drainage problems and to remove and disconnect
existing street cuts into Rufe Snow Drive which have not been authorized
by the City and which do not conform to the Ordinances of the City.
2.
The City Manager is directed to stay within the existing
right of way for Rufe Snow Drive in constructing such drainage
improvements.
day of
,1980.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
APPROVED:
Di ck Faram; t1ayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
c=21
Di\TE: 12/3/80
e
SUBJECT:
30-405 City of North Richlãnd Hills/Tarrant County Mackey
Creek Channel Improvements, Phase II, Project No. B-80-UC-48-000l
DEP ART~1ENT:
Utility
BACKGROUND: The Tarrant County Planning Department has advised that approximately
$89,000 is available from the HUD Grant. The project is estimated to cost
$100,000.
Richard Albin will be -giving a presentation in pre-council.
~
e
:-
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Authorize an expenditure of $11,000 from
Utility Fund Surplus in order to complete project.
BUDGETED ITEr'l:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
Utility Surplus
----~~-------~~---~---~-~----~------~------~~------------~~------~~-~----~--~--
e
·/
,.
e
e
e
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ Fort \Vorth-[Jdllé1s
Oecember 2, 1980
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 30-405, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS/TARRANT COUNTY,
MACKEY CREEK CHANNEL Ir~PROVEMENTS, PHASE II,
PROJECT NO. ß-80-UC-48-0001
We have completed the construction plans and Contract Documents for the
6th year Entitlement Program, 2nd year Community Development Block Grant
project on Mackey Creek. The project consists of extending the concrete
channel liner from the end of the 5th year project to Jerrell Street;
reconstruction of the existing undersized culvert on Jerrell; construction
of a channel access ramp into the creek from Jerrell Street for main-
tenance; asphalt pave1nent replacement; and utility adjustments. The
total estimated construction cost including engineering and contingencies
is $100,000.00 as shown on the attached tabulation.
The Tarrant County Planning Department has advised us that only approxi-
mately $89,000 is available for funding this project and there is no
guarantee of any additional contingency monies becoming available. The
estimated channel improvement costs total $61,682, pavement replacement
costs total $17,633, and utility adjustments total $10,388. The additional
amount required above the $89,000 available form HUD is about $11,000
based on our cost estimates.
We would suggest that the City of North Richland Hills consider partici-
pating in this project in the amount of $11,000, most of which would
be required for the utility adjustments. Since estimated utility ad-
jusbnent costs total approximately $11,000, you may wish to use the
Utility Surplus found to make up the difference in the costs above the
$89,000 provided by HUD, and the total estimated construction cost of
$100,000.
We will be present at the December 8, 1980, council meeting to answer
any questions you may have concerning this project.
.~
P.E.
.
R~~,l\/l j c
c C : r'1 r. C h a r 1 e s t~. Hill i am s, City t:1 a nag e r
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Utilities
Mr. Delton Thrasher, Program Coordinator
550 FIRST STATE BANK SLOG, · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
J-3
KNOVVlTO'J-ENGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
~ ,~'t.C f~t~/"" ~'o.&.M
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
OWNER: TARRANT COUNTY/CITY OF NO~H RICHLAND HILLS JOB NO. 30-405 DATE: 12/2/80
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: MACKEY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS. PHASE II
-=
DESCRIPT'ON OF ITEM ITEM UN 1T TOTAL UNIT COST
NO. QUANTITY PR IC E
Unclassified Channel Excavation 1. C.Y. 313 $ 9.00 $ 2~817.00
2000 PSI Cl.tlSI1 Unformed Concrete for Channel Liner
\-J/ S tee 1 2. C.Y. 27 .. 225.00 6,075.00
311 Dia. Weep Holes \A/ith Filter Media 3. EACH 18 15.00 270.00
3000 PSI Cl.uA" Formed Concrete for Culvert1Wing-
walls and Sidewalks 4. C.Y. 79 325.00 25,675.00
Reinf. Steel for Culvert, Wingwalls & Sidewalks 5. LB. 11,850 0.50 5 , 925 . 0 Q..
Anchor Plates for Culvert Railinq 6. EACH 14 50.00 700.00
Posts for Culvert Railing 7. EACH 14 150.00 2 , 1 00. OC ,
Triple Pipe Culvert Railinq 8. L.F. 92 50.00 4,,600.0C> '
3000 PSI C1. nA~t Formed Concrete for Channel Access
Ramp, w/Steel 9. C.Y. 22 400.00 8,800.0C
Channel Access Ramp Railing 10. L.F. 51 20.00 1,020.0C.
Channel Access Ramp Anchor Plates for Ra i 1 i ng 11. EACH 10 15.00 150. or
Channel Access Ramp Posts 12. EACH 10 35.00 350.0':-
Channel Access Ramp Barricade 13. L.S. 1 200.00 200.(
Remove Exist. CGM Arch Structure 15. L.S. 1 3000.00 3,000.:\
Su b- Tota 1 Channel Improvements $ 61, 682 ~~,
Unclassified Street Excavation 14. c. Y .' 120 9.00 1,080.
Remove Existing Curb & Gutter 16. L.F. 213 4.00 852, .
~emove Existlng Loncrete Drlveways 17. S.F. 215 0.80 17r>
MC-3D, or EA-lMiSAsph.Prlme Coat wlSariâ 18. S.Y. 378 1.00 37b.
RC-2 or EA-HVRS ASDh. Tack Coat 19. S.v. 756 0.90 680. . -
Type itA" H~1AC 411 Thick 20. S.v. 378 17.00 6, 426 ~ "~"
Type IIDu Hr~AC 211 Thick 21. S.Y. 378 11.00 '21,158.0;
Su bqr. S ta b. \AI/ L i me S 1 u r r v 6 II t h i c k 22. S.v. 367 2.50 917 5i¡,.
Lime for Subqrade Stabilization 23. TON 6.2 85.00 527.00
6" Curb and 18" Gutter w/Steel 24. L.F. 169 10.00 1,,690.00
51& c Thi c'k Concrete Drives \v/Steel 25. S.F. 215 3.50 752.50
Sub-Tctal Pavement Repl acement. $ 17,,633.4('-
611 Dia. Ductile Iron Pipe for Water Line Repl. 26. L.F. 85 25.00 2,-125.0U
Ductile Iron Fittings 27. LB. 385 2.50 962.50
,6~, Gate Valve and Box. 28. EACH 2 400.00 800.00
f2UDDPS I C1. ~-n -Conc. for 'Encasement 29. C.Y. 5.8 250.00 1,450.00
6uDia.DIP for Sanitar_y Sewer Line Replacement 30. L.F. 42 25.00 1,050.00
4811 Dia. Sanitary Sewer Manhole 31. EACH 2 2000.00 4,000.00
Su b- Tota 1 Utlllty ~dJustments 1$· 10,387.50
$ 89) 7 or ..... -.,
REVIEWED & APPROVED: SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST - ---
PLUS Engineering & Contingencies 1 0 ,- 297 .. '~
. ~
W, O~.?G -,
-
,
p~OJECT .....AHAGER TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $100,00:
e
e
.
80
DATE: 12/3/80
SUBJECT:
Payment to First Southwest Comþany
DEPARTMENT: Finance
BACKGROUND: Payment to First Southwest Company is for fees and services
rendered in connection with the sale of 2.4 million Water Works and
Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1980.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve or deny paYlnent
BUDGETED ITEr~:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUfv18ER:
Water & Sewer Bond Revenue
--------------~-------~-----------~--~---~----~~-------~----------~~--~-~-~-~-~
STATEMENT
1<'IH.ST 3øtd;1w;-e4é GO~IPANY
INVEST~IENT BANKERS
M ERCANTI LE BAN K 8U ILDI NG
D...~LLAS, TEXAS 75201
November 24, 1980
r $2,400,000 -,
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
\V A TER WOR KS AN D SE \VER 5 YS TENl
REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1980
L
-I
'1-
---
,
$17,880.09
Fee Due Us (Contract dated 7-16-80)
Plus Reirnbursable Expenses:
Rating Fees:
tv1oody's Investors Service, Inc.
Standard & Poor's Corporation
Travel Expense Relative to
Ne\v York Rating Trip
Total Reimbursable
TOTAL FEE DUE US
$2,500.00
2,800.00
3,485.52
8,785.52
$26,665.52
e
e
-
e
e
. -
...
~/.
DATE: 12/3/80
SUBJECT:
Resolution on Social Security program
DEPARTMENT: City Manager
BACKGROUND: This resolution will authorize the Mayor to inform the appropriate
federal agency of our intent to withdraw from Social Security. Item will be
discussed in pre-council. See attached survey results.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve or deny resolution
BUDGETED ITEM: YES N/A NO
Jl.CCOVNT NUrf1BER:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\ \.\\
~~)~ j,~.~)
Resolution No. ~
WHEREAS, an election has been held among the employees
of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, wherein each voted to
continue or discontinue participation in the Social Security program; and,
WHEREAS, a majority of the employees voted in favor of
discontinuing participation in the Social Security program;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT Resolved by the City Council of the
City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1 .
The Mayor is hereby authorized to ·inform the appropriate Federal
Agency that the City employees of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas,
will not participate in the Social Security Program on and after
January 1, 1983.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of
,1980.
APPROVED:
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette t1oore, Ci ty Secretary
tit
City of JX9rth Richland Hills, Texas
TO:
Honorable Mayor and
Counci 1 ~;1embers
DATE:
November 19, 1980
FROM:
REF:
Charles Hilliams
Ci ty r~anager
SUBJECT: Social Security Withdrawal
Tab A is the result of a questionnaire I sent to each of our
employees in October of this year surveying their feelings toward
the possible withdrawal from Social Security.
e
Based on the results of the questionnaire, I recommend you adopt
the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor to file a letter
of Intent vJith the Director of Soc-jal Security Board of the State
of Texas expressing the intent to withdraw from Social Security.
This resolution does not lock us in on vJithdrawing on January 1, 1983,
it only expresses our intent to withdraw. We will then have two years
to complete a detailed study. We may withdraw our intent at any
time in the 2 years. If we wait to express our intent until after
January 1, it \~Jill be January 1, 1984 before it becomes effective.
I further recon]nend that next budget year we earmark sufficient
funds to engage professional services to be rendered in connection
with the preparation of a comprehensive study of the feasibility
and desirability of withdrawal from Social Security and explore
various options to replace Social Security.
Tab B contains a copy of the questionnaire and Tab C is a proposed
Council Resolution.
e
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 ,; P. 0, BOX 13305 ' NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118
TAB A
Attitudes of The City of North Richland Hills
Employees Toward Withdrawal from the System
This tab presents the results of a survey of the City of North Richland
Hills employees to determine their attitudes toward withdrawal from the
Social Security system. The survey questionnaire was distributed in
October to approximately 180 employees. Over 130 responses were received.
The questionnaire was designed to determine whether or not employees favor
withdrawal from the system, the reasons for their opinions, how they believe
savings should be used if withdrawal occurs, and how many employees who
oppose withdrawal could consider changing jobs if the City of North
Richland Hills did withdraw. The questionnaire also asked for background
information on each respondent, specifically, age, salary level, years
employed by the City, and degree of knowledge about the Social Security
system. A copy of the questionnaire is attached at Tab Be Tab C is
á proposed Council resolutiøn. The highlights of the responses received"are
as follows:
* On Withdrawal
Of those employees who have an oplnlon (137)~
92 are in favor of withdrawal, 17 opposed,
and 28 were not sure.
* Reasons for Favoring Withdrawal
Listed as the principal reason for withdrawal of those
favoring withdrawal:
50 believe that Social Security will not have sufficient
funds to pay benefits.
17 believe that benefits provided under the system are
not worth the taxes being paid.
9 believe that the benefits provided by the City are
adequate to cover their needs.
5 oppose Social Security in principle.
8 other
e
e
e
I ..
*
Reasons for Opposing Withdrawal
Primary reasons opposed to withdrawal:
7 want to remain in Social Security because the
system provides continuous coverage for employment
with different employers.
4 are in favor of Social Security in principle.
1 will rely on it to provide Medicare coverage
at the least cost.
2 are relying on Social Security for their
retirement needs.
1 favor Social Security because benefits are
automatically adjusted for inflation.
2 believe Social Security is a good buy for the
taxes being paid.
o other reasons.
* Application of The City of North Richland Hills Tax Savings
Of those in favor of withdrawal:
51 would like to see the City apply its savings to new
or increased benefits.
17 would like to see the City replace Social Security
benefits.
5 would like to see the savings used to reduce the City's
operating expenses.
13 other reasons.
* Application of the Employee's Personal Tax Savings
Of those in favor of withdrawal:
57 would like to receive their own savings in the form
of increased take-home pay.
13 would like to apply their savings to new or increased
benefits.
6 would like to use the savings to replace Social Security
benefits in some form~
8 other reasons.
* On Changing Jobs
Of those opposed to withdrawal, 5% (1) said they would
consider changing jobs if the City did withdraw and
47% (8) said they were not sure.
SUMMARY
The majority of the City of North Richland Hills employees (76%)
of those who have an opinion are in favor of withdrawal from the system.
The main reason given for desiring withdrawal is the belief that the
system will not have sufficient funds to pay benefits. Also, a significant
number of respondents indicate that the benefits provided by the Social
Security System are not worth the taxes contributed. The great majority
of those favoring withdrawal would like to see the City's savings applied
to new or increased benefits, while only 18% expressed interest in having
,
Social Security benefits replaced~ Approximately half of those favoring
withdrawal would like to receive inc}~eased take-home pay, and 14% would
like to apply their savings to new or increased benefits. One percent (1%)
of those opposed to \vithdrawal indicate they would change jobs if the City
did withdravJ from the system and another 47% indicated that they would
consider it~
CONCLUSION
A decision on withdrawal from the Social Security system involves a great
deal of speculation about future economic, social, and political developments~
The potential benefits and risks of \vithdrawal are summarized below.
23
e
BENEFITS
* The City of North Richland Hills and its employees could be
assured of receiving their money's worth from contributions to
benefit programs.
* Withdrawal could protect the City and its employees from
higher tax rates projected for the future.
* Withdrawal would be consistent v/ith the attitudes expressed
by a majority of the City employees.
* The City of North Richland Hills would have increased contról
and flexibility in designing benefit programs more attractive
to its employees.
R I S KS
*
General revenue financing of the system, in whole or in part,
e
could place the City of North Richland Hills employees in the
position of paying, through income taxes, for benefits to
which they would not be entitled. (Under current law, an
organization may not re-enter the system once it has withdrawn.)
e
* Mandatory universal coverage could force the City back into
the system after a fairly sizable investment of time and money
in a privately sponsored benefit program.
* Total replacement of benefits is impractical and undesirable~
On the other hand, not replacing benefits could adversely affect
a number of employees, particularly those who terminate employment
with the City before normal retirement.
* It is possible that changes in the system or future economic
conditions will result in lower Social Security costs than are
currently anticipated_
* Public opinion toward the Social Security system may change,
which could have a detrimental effect on the City of North
Richland Hills employment practices.
We can conclude that, based on current conditions, a decision to withdraw
would be financially advantageous and would be well received by the majority
of the City of North Richland Hills employees. The cos~ savings could be
applied to the partial replacement of Social Security benefits and to
alternative benefit programs as well., The major problem with such a decision
is the uncertain future course of the Social Security system. General revenue
financing, elimination of minimum benefits, and separation of Medicare
and disability benefits from the system could remove many of the financial
advantages of withdrawal.
Although the advantages of withdrawal outweigh the risks, so far as the
facts can now be known, the uncertainty involving the Social Security
system, makes a final decision undesirable at this time~ The course of
the system may become evident within the coming months and years. In the
meantime, the City has taken one step which involves no possible adverse
consequences. The City will have served notice of intent to withdraw from
the system effective December 31, 1982. (Two-year notice is required by
law.) This notice is not binding unless it remains in force for the two
years without being revoked. The City may even revoke the notice at any time
within the two-year period and then resubmit it. The advantages of serving
notice at this time are:
25
e
e
*
If the trend of Social Security changes within the next
two years, and does not increase the risks of withdrawal,
the City would be in a position to pullout of the system
sooner. The December 31 date is the most logical effective
date, since the bulk of Social Security taxes are paid in
the early months of each calendar year.
If the trend of Social Security changes increases the risks
associated with withdrawal, the notice may be revoked without
penalty. (It may even be revoked, then refiled,'establishing _
a new tw~-year delay.)
If Congress legislates nlandatory coverage, it is conceivable
that only those organizations who have already submitted their
notice of intent to withdraw would be permitted to withdraw in
the future..
*
*
If withdrawal from the system appears likely, the City of North Richland
Hills should examine in depth the alternative applications for the tax savings
so that implementation of a new benefit program could be effective on the date
of withdrawal. Such an examination should probably be started at least a
full year before withdrawal is to take effect.
While our survey of employee attitudes towards Social Security indicates a
strong desire to withdraw from the system, we believe the survey results
should be interpreted with caution. We suspect that some of the negative
reaction to the Social Security system has resulted from sensationalism in
the press typified by predictions of imminent bankruptcy of the system~
We therefore suggest that if the City decides to serve notice of intent to
withdraw, a thorough program be undertaken to educate and inform all of the
City of North Richland Hills employees of the potentially adverse consequences
as well as the benefits of withdrawal.
e
TAB B
THIS INFORt1ATION HILL REr'1AIN CONFIDEr~TIAL - SOCIAL SECURITY 5U,RVEY Oí~L\¡
SURVEY OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS EMPLOYEES
Social Security Questionnaire
1 . Name: (optional)
2. f'i1a ri ta 1 Status: ( ) tc'1a rri ed ( ) Single
3. f'!umber of years employed by the City of tJo rth Ri chl and, Hi lls
( ) Under 5 years
( ) 5 years or over
4. Your age:
Under 40
) 40 to 49
.( ,.) 5Gp,r over
5. Your present salary level:
) Under $15,000
) $15,001 to $~O,OOO
) Over $20,000
c:
v.
Ho\v \¡Joul d you rate your knov/l edge of the Saci a 1 Securi ty System?
"
) Iligh - I have a thorough knowledge of the retirement, death, and
disability benefits and financing structure of the System.
Ave}~age - I have an idea of the benefits and financing structure
of the System, but not a thorough knowledge.
) Low - r·~ knowledge of the benefits and firiancing structure of the
System is minimal.
7. The City of North Richland Hills is considering withdrawal from the Social
Security System. Withdrawal would mean that:
(a) The City of North Richland Hills and its employees woµld no longer
contribute to the System. (Currently, The City and its employees
each contribute 6.13 of pay up to $25,900.)
(b) Employees would not recei've Social Security eligibility and benefit
credit for future employment with The City. However, past employment
during \'Jhich Social Security taxes \\!ere paid \',i11 still count for
deterfnining eligibility and benefits under the System. Social
Security benefits for employees with forty quarters of coverage
who are nearing age 65 would not be significantly req~ced.
. .,..
-.
7. ·(continued)
Do you thi nk that 'The City shaul d \'Ji thdravl from Soci a 1 Securi ty?
e ( Yes
( ) No
( ,) Not Sure
8. If you ans\vered IIYES" to Question 7, \A!hy do you think The City should
withdraw from Social Security? (You may select as many reasons as you
\'Jish but rank the.i'r ji~pot'\tance by assigning number 1 to the most important,
number 2 to the next most important, etc.)
I believe Social Security will not have sufficient funds to pay my
benefits.
I believe that!'benefits provided under Social Security are not \tJorth
the money that The City and I are paying into the System.
I believe the retirement, death and disability benefits provided by
The City are adequate to cover my needs and the needs of my family.
___ I oppose Social Security in principle.
Other
(Specify)
a
..
9. If you ansv'Jered IIYES" to Question 7, ho\!.f do you think The City's savings
should be used?
( ) To replace benefits formerly provided by Social Sec~rity
( ) To provide new or increased benefits
( ) To reduce The City's cost of doing business
( ) Other (Specify)
If ~you ans\,.¡ered "YÈS" to Question 7, hO\'J \·Jould you use your share of Social
Security taxes saved?
To replace benefits formerly provided by Social Security
To provide new or increased benefits
.
To increase take-home pay
Other (Specify)
-2-
10. Complete this Question even if you ans\'Jered "no" to Question 7. ~;!hat'
do you think are good reasons to remain in the Social .Security System?
(You may select as many reasons as you wish, but rank ~their importance
by assigning number 1 to the most important, number '2 ,to the next most
important) et.c. PLEASE INDIC,ll,TE AT LEAST OffE CHOICE
. Social Security provides for continued ':retirement) death, and
- di sabi 1 ity ,,:coverage even if I change jobs.
I believe Soci.al Security benefits are,:a good 'buy for the money
---- the City and I are paying into the System.
I believe Social Security benefits ~..¡ill'be necessary to provide
- me and my falnily .\\ "ith an adequate level '.of retirement income.
____ Social Security ~benefits are automatically adjusted for inflation.
Full Social Security coverage gives me the right to ~'1edicare
---- coverage at the least cost.
I am in favor of Social Security in principle.
Other (Specify)
11. If you ansvJered IINOII to Question 7, \\'ould you consider changing jobs if
the City did \~Jithdraw from Social SecutitJ/?
( ) Yes
( ) tJo
( ) not Sure
-3-