HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1982-04-12 Agendas
.
.
CITY OF NORTH RfCHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
r·O f' the Meet i ng
April 12, 1982
-~
at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUf-.i1 ER
ITEM
~
ACTION TAKEN
PRE-COUNCIL
P.M.
Discussion on Tax A reement (Wayne Rohne .
Tax Attorney)
Presentation of 1980-81 Audit Re art
b Peat-Marwick-Mitchell & Co
COUNCIL
M
o Order
all
f Minutes
..the.
· · tpred to
--.-+-
. 7. I Roll Ca.ll
I
8. " LconSideration of
, Tern
Election of Mayor Pro
'Page 2
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FOì' the Meeting
April 12, 1982
~ at 7:30 p.m.~ in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
~9. Resolution - Special Recognition
10. Consideration of Appointment of Board of
Adjustment Member
11. Consideration of Appointments to the
Library Commission
12. Presentation of 1980-81 Audit Repo'rt
b Peat-Marwick-Ï'litchell & Co
_....~. ¿
PI-JANNING & ZONING - P 82-5, Request of
Frederick CuI for Final Plat of Lot 1,
Block 1 CuI Addition
ING & ZONIB-G - Cons:!-geration .QJ
ance for PZ 82-
at t.he Mar
Ordinance No. 942
o
L ...
~,
~~hi"t.e and
A ociat~s. to proceed with Pl çJ1!"'
itications and to ap
S$lry Funds for S:ignalizati
Page 3
.
CITY OF NORTH RfCHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
For the Meeting
April 12, 1982
~ at 7:30 p.m.. in the City Hall, 7301 N.E. loop 820.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
18. Consideration of Approval of Change
Order #2 - Rufe Snow Drive, Phase I
19. Consideration of Partial Payment,
Estimate #5 to Austin Road Company in
the Amount of $35 799.75 - Rufe Snow
Drive
20. Consideration of Partial Pa ent,
Estimate t1 to C. R. Feazell in the
811.99 - GIenview Drive
·ustment
Consideration of Award of Bid for
Macke Creek Channel Improvements,
Phase III
22. Consideration pf Resolution for
Housin Rehabilitation Revenue Bonds
23. Consideration of Authorizing Si ning
of Tax Collection A reement with
Rohne & Hooden Ie, Attorne s
.' 24.
Consideration of Ordinance Ado tin
Section 33.07 of the Pro ert Tax Code
_ 25..
Citizen Presentation
.6.
Ad "ournment
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETING OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL,
7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, MARCH 22, 1982
7:30 P.M.
.
1 . Mayor Faram called the meeting to order March 22, 1 982 , at CALL TO ORDER
7:30 p.m.
2. Present: Di.ck Faram Mayor ROLL CALL
Jim Kenna
J. C. Hubbard
Wiley Thomas Councilmen
Jim Ramsey
Dave Freeman
Sharyl Groves Counc i 1 wonlan
Staff:
Rodger N. Line City Manager
Jeanette Moore City Secretary
Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager
Cecil Forester Director Public Works/Utilities
Rex McEntire City Attorney
Richard Albin City Engineer
Planning and Zoning Members:
Don Bowen
¡ r~argi e Nash
! . George Tucker
I
. Carl Greenfield
City of Watauga Officials:
Virgil Anthony Mayor
R. E. Dollarhide Councilman
Hector Garcia Councilman
James Suratt Councilman
Thelma Mock Councilwoman
Ferris Jones Councilman
H. R. ~·1cComber City Manager
Members of the Press:
Les Harper Fort Worth Star Telegram
Denise r·1orris Mid Cities News
3. Master Scott Ramsey, gave the invocation. INVOCATION
,
.
4. Councilman Hubbard moved; seconded by Councilwoman
Groves, to approve the minutes of the March 11, 1982,
Council meeting.
,..
Motion carried 5-0; Councilman Freeman abstaining due
to absence from the meeting.
5. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing ~o speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. Robert Boustring, 3712 Sweetbriar, Bedford,
Board Member Fort Worth Christian College,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Boustring stated they had a problem with the
gym at the college flooding and he felt that if this
request was approved it would eliminate the problem.
Mr. Boustring stated it would also provide housing
for their teachers.
Mr. Don Ferguson, 7401 Christoper Court, North
Richland'Hills, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Ferguson stated he felt this rezoning would help
the flood problem and the 60 foot wide street would
help with the traffic problem.
,
.'
Mrs. Carolyn Bonham, 1625 Weyland Drive, North Richland
Hills, appeared before the CQuncil.
Mrs. Bonham stated she felt this rezoning would be
a good thing. Mrs. Bonham stated she lived in
the sub-division next to this property.
Mr. Douglas Davis, 6204 Abbott Avenue, Nbrth Richland
Hills, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Davis stated he was a member 'of the Citizen Advisory
Committee for Area #3. Mr. Davis stated he wanted it known
that he had no interest whatsoever in this property. The
developers knew he was a member of the committee and
asked him to make a survey of the neighbors. Mr. Davis
stated he made the survey and there was no resistance
to the building. Mr. Davis stated he strongly recommended
that the Council approve this request.
Mr. Forest Grubb, 6528 Topper, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Grubb stated he had been a member of the North Richland
Hills Planning and Zoning Commission and recognized the flooding
problems. Mr. Grubb stated he felt this development would
enhance the flood control.
March 22', 1982
Page 2
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF MARCH 11, lOQ2
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-2, REQUEST OF
TLB-GSC ENTERPRISES~
INCORPORATED TO REZe
TRACTS 2 & 3A,
ABSTRACT 1753, J.C.
YATES SURVEY, TRACT
ABSTRACT 1891, D. H~
HIGHTOWER SURVEY,
AND TRACT 2F,
ABSTRACT 366, W. W.
COOK SURVEY FROM
IF-9-0NE FAMILY
DWELLING TO MULTIPLE
F Ar·1 I L Y
,
.
.'
.
Mr. Theron Bonham, Representative of TLB-GSC Enterprises,
Incorporated, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Bonham stated they also had developed the adjacent
sub-division. When they developed the sub-division, they
had put in a channel and when the last two big rains
came he talked with Mr. Bronstad and Mr. Forester who
looked at the channel during the rains and it handled
the run-off fine~
Mr. Bonham asked that the Council approve this request.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
of this request to please come forward.
Mr. John Gibbs, 5728 Bermuda Drive, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Gibbs stated he was not really in opposition to this
request, but would like to ask a couple of questions.
Mr. Gibbs asked what was going to happen to the traffic
on Holiday Lane and what would happen to the water downstream.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Gibbs to be more specific.
Mr. Gibbs stated he was refering to the water at thë
bridge"at the high school.
Mayor Faram stated the developers if granted the request,
would be required to take the water course to a recognized
drainage channel at the developers cost.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
6. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman,
to approve PZ 82-2, Ordinance No. 941.
Motion carried 6-0.
7. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. Neal Cukerbaum, 4950 West Grove, Dallas, representing
Cambridge Companies, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Cukerbaum stated it was their intent to develop a
shopping center. Mr. Cukerbaum stated they wanted to
have mixed office space, one story and multi-story
buildings and a hotel-motel building. Mr. Cukerbaum
stated there was a limitation on the height of
buildings in Local Retail zoning was the reason
they wanted commercial zoning.
March 22, '1982
Page 3
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 82-2
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 941
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-3, REQUEST OF
CAMBRIDGE COMPANIES,
INCORPORATED AND
CROSSROADS DEVELOPMEN
LTD. TO REZONE BLOCKS
2 & 3, SNOW HEIGHTS
NORTH ADDITION, &
TRACTS 2B4, 20, AND
A PORTION OF TRACT 2A
ABSTRACT 1606, W. W.
WALLACE SURVEY FROM
LOCAL RETAIL TO
COr~MERCIAL
f
I
I· .
t
Mayor Faram stated he had a problem with the commercial
zoning because of the number of undesirable businesses
that could be placed in commercial.
Mayor Faram asked if the request could be altered.
Mr. Cukerbaum stated he would not be against deed
restrictions on the property against undesi'rable users.
Mayor Faram askeØ Mr'. Cukerbaum what kind of time limit
he was on in getting this property rezoned.
Mr. Cukerbaum stated he was not on such a tight time limit
that this request could be delayed until the next meeting.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
8. Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to
postpone PZ 82-3, Ordinance No. 942, until the meeting of
April 12, 1982.
Motion carried 6-0.
9. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come
for\-/ard.
Mr. Burk Collins, Owner of Riéhland Square Shopping
Center, appeared before the Çouncil.
Mr. Collins stated that a Chinese restaurant was
planned for this site and they wanted to sell mixed
beverages. .
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Collins if he was aware
that the permit would be issued in a specific name
and would be non-transferable.
Mr. Collins stated the permit would be in the name
of Tommy Lok.
.'
10. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve PZ 82-4, Ordinance No. 943, permit to be in
the name of Tommy Lok and non-transferable.
Motion carried 6-0.
t1arch 22,. 1982
Page 4
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 82-~
ORDINANCE NO. 942
POSTPONED
PLANNING & ZONI~c
PUBLIC HEARING
PI 82-4, REQUEST OF
BURK COLLINS AND
TOMMY LOK (CHINESE
RESTAURANT) TO REZONE
A PORTION OF LOT 3RB,
BLOCK 25, CLEARVIEW
ADDITION FROM
LOCAL RETAIL TO LOCAL
RETAIL-SPECIFIC USE-
SALE OF ALCOHOLIC
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 82-~
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 943
.
e.
!
.
11. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for
anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please
come forward.
Mr. Burk Collins, Owner Richland Square Shopping Center,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Collins stated this site was also going to be
used for a restaurant and they wanted to be able to sell
alcoholic beverages. Mr. Collins stated the permit
would be in the name of Chris Arkas.
Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition
to this request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram
closed the public hearing.
12. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna,
to approve PZ 82-5, Ordinance No. 944, permit to be
in the name of Chris Arkas and non-transferable.
Motion carried 6-0.
13. Mayor Faram read the following ordinance caption:
"AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDÉRING
AND PROVIDING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF THE
FOLLOWING STREET: RUFE SNOW DRIVE FROM ST. LOUIS SOUTH-
WESTERN RAILROAD NORTH TO FAIR MEADOWS DRIVE IN THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, LETTING CONTRACT TO
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING
ITS EXECUTION: MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PAYING THE INDEBTEDNESS THEREBY INCURRED: MAKING PROVISIONS
FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESSr1ENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES
AND THE OWNERS THEREFORE FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH
IMPROVEMENTS: PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE
CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS: DIRECTING THE
CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS
ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS,
DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS
RELATIVE TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENTS' ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES: DIRECTING THE
CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING
THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOK OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND
BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDINANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCEII
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve Ordinance No. 945.
Motion carried 6-0.
March 22, 1982
Page 5
PLANNING & ZONING
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ 82-5, REQUEST OF
BURK COLLINS AND
MAMA1S PIZZA,
INCORPORATED TO REZO]
A PORTION OF LOT 3RB
BLOCK 25, CLEARVIEW
ADDITION FROM
LOCAL RETAIL TO
LOCAL RETAIL-SPECIFI(
USE-SALE OF ALCOHOLI(
BEVERAGES
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE FOR PZ 82-t
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 944
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE DETERMINING
THE NECESSITY FOR AND
ORDERING AND PROVIDIN
FOR THE IMPROVEMENT 0
A PORTION OF RUFE SNO
DRIVE
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 945
. March 22, 1982
Page 6
14. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone
wishing to speak to please. come forward.
.
.
Mr. Al Rich, 6636 Avalon, Watauga, appeared before the
Council.
PUBLIC HEARING
RUFE SNOW DRIVF
IMPROVEMENTS
Mr. Rich stated he really did not understand what was happening
in the way of assessments and payments. Mr. Rich stated it was
his understanding that the city wanted to purchase close
to 1800 square, feet of his property at $1.20 a square foot
and then wanted him to pay approximately $1,235.00 for curb
and gutter. Mr. Rich stated it was his understanding that
he could not be assessed at more than what the improvements
would increase his property. Mr. Rich stated he could not
see how his property would increase in value, by losing 1800
square feet of property for a six inch curb. Mr. Rich stated
he understood the need for the street improvement, but he
could not see the city paying him $1,235.00 for his property
and him having to spend part of it for curb and gutter that
he really did not want.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Rich if it was his contention that
his property would not increase in value.
Mr. Rich stated he was pretty well convinced that it
would not improve his property.
Mr. MçEntire stated there had been an agreement made between
North Richland Hills City Council and Watauga City Council,
with respect to disagreement on values. Mr. McEntire stated
there would be independent appraisers appointed by each city.
Mr. McEntire advised Mr. Rich that it was the feeling that
the widening of Rufe Snow would increase the value of his
property.
Mr. Rich stated he did not feel it would increase his value
anymore than it would everyone elses.
!
Mayor Faram stated that in his meeting with the Mayor, City Manager,
Councilmen Garcia and Suratt, he made a commitment to them that
he felt the Council would honor. The agreement was that the
City of Watauga and the City of North Richland Hills could select
a neutral appraiser and base the purchase price on the appraisal
if there was a disagreemen~. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Rich if
he would be willing to settle on the agreement that was made.
Mr. Rich stated he did not particularly like the idea.
Mayor Faram advised Mr. Rich that if the appraisal came up
different an adjustment would be maQe. Further, if the
contract estimate came in cheaper than what had been forecast
there may be some additional credits coming to him.
March 22, 1982
Page 7
Mr. Rich stated that to get the appraisers would be fine.
He thought everything would be settled tonight.
.
r
Mayor Faram stated that hopefully the ordinance would be
approved tonight, but there could be exceptions, if
he felt he had been unfairly dealt with, then he would
be exception number one.
Mrs. Mary Hensarling, 6613 Sunset Road, North Richland
Hills, appeared before the Council.
Mrs. Hensarling stated she agreed there was a need to
improve the street, but felt everyone that it would
benefit should have to pay. Mrs. Hensarling stated
she did not feel they should be assessed.
Mrs. Hensarling stated the street was behind
her house and would not benefit or increase the
value of her property. Mrs. Hensarling asked when
and who devised the assessment plan for Rufe Snow.
Mr. Albin stated that Resolution No. 79-28 set
the rates for assessments.
Mrs. Hensarling asked if she could find out how close
the street would come to her fence.
..
Mr. Albin showed Mrs. Hensarling a map showing how
close the street would be to her fence.
Mayor Faram advised Mrs. Hensarling that property was
not going to be assessed anymore than it would
increase in value.
Mr. Chip Driver, 6636 Sunset, North Rich1and Hills,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Driver stated that he would like to know what
he was being charged for.
Mayor Faram stated that Mr. Driver had 117 feet of
frontage and his total assessment would be $1,209.93.
.'
Mr. Driver asked how close Rufe Snow would be to
his property line.
Mr. Albin showed Mr. Driver his property on the map and
where the street would be located.
.
Mr. Driver stated his house was only 38 feet from
Rufe Snow at the present time. Mr. Driver stated
the street would be next to his fence line and all
I . he got out of the deal was paying money out. Mr. Driver
stated he agreed the improvements were needed, but he
was having to pay for everyone elses property values
to go up. Mr. Driver stated the whole community would
go up in value and why should a chose few have to be
the ones to pay.
Mayor Faram stated that corner lots normally had a
greater assessment because there was more frontage,
but by the same token they were higher in value.
Mr. Davis stated he did not feel corner lots were
higher in. value.
Mayor Faram advised t1r. Driver that-the street improvement
was not totally at his expense, the rest of the taxpayers
would share the expense. Mayor Faram stated the assessment
against the property would raise the value and if it did
not then it would be adjusted.
Mr. Driver stated that if it raised the price of his house,
and when he got ready to sell, no family would want to
move into a house with a five lane road that close. .
Mayor Faram stated it was not inconceivable that Mr. Driver's
property sometime down the road might turn into a commercial
package.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Driver if he did agree the street
improvements were needed.
Mr. Driver stated he did agree the improv~ments were needed.
Mayor Faram asked Mr. Driver if he took exception to the
assesslnent.
Mr. Driver stated he did take exception to the assessment.
Mayor Faram stated Mr. Driver's property would be'
appraised by an independent certified appraiser.
,*
Mr. Driver asked if he could have an appraiser.
Mayor Faram stated yes, if he wanted to pay for a certified
appraiser, then the city would accept his figures.
March 22, 1982
Page 8
f
.
.
.'
.
Mr. Driver stated he wanted to talk to his father-in-law
about this first, but he would like to be an exception.
Mr. Driver stated that if no one objected to him getting
an appraiser, and if he did, he would be in touch with the
city officials within three days.
Mayor Faram advised Mr. Driver that if he chose an appraiser
then he would have to pay for it. Mayor Faram advised
Mr. Driver to make sure the appraiser was certified.
Mr. C. B. Pippin, 6701 Rufe Snow Drive, Watauga, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Pippin stated he would also be speaking in behalf of
his mother at 6640 Summertime. Mr. Pippin stated
the letter he received stated the assessment was $10.69 a
front foot for curb and gutter. r1r.Pippin stated that
in the Watauga Council meeting it was his understanding
that he would be contacted and see if an ágreement could
be reached. Mr. Pippin stated no one had contacted him.
Mayor Faram stated the figure that was quoted was an engineer's
estimate and was an upper figure. Mayor Faram stated the
figure could be adjusted downward, but not higher depending
on how the bids came in.
Mr. Pippin stated there was an existing curb on half of his
property at the present time.
Mayor Faram asked if the existing curb met specifications.
Mr. Albin replied no.
Mr. Pippin stated that the street would come within 6 feet
of his mother's bedroom and if that improved the property
value, he would like to know how.
Mr. Albin showed Mr. Pippin the map on the propsed street.
Mr. Albin stated the street would not be that close, only
the working right-of-way.
Mayor Faram advised Mr. Pippin that the city would deal
with each individual property owner.
Mr. Pippin asked that if the property did object, would the
city get in touch with them individually.
Mayor Faram stated yes.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Faram closed
the public hearing.
March 22, 1982
Page 9
15. Mayor Faram read the following caption:
"AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING ESTIMATES OF THE
COST OF IMPROVEMENTS AND OF AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED
FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING STREET:' RUFE SNOW
DRIVE FROM ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD NORTH
TO FAIR MEADOWS DRIVE IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS; , FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
TO THE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND TO ALL
OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES; DIRECTING THE CITY
SECRETARY TO GIVE· NOTICE OF SUCH HEARING; AND
DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL
THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN
THE MINUTE BOOK OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDINANCE
IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND DECLARING AN Er·1ERGENCY. II
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve Ordinance No. 946.
Motion carried 6-0.
16. Mayor Faram read the following caption:
"ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FO.R
A PORTION OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF THE
FOLLOWING STREET; RUFE, SNOW DRIVE FROM ST. LOUIS
SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD NORTH TO FAIR MEADOWS DRIVE IN
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS, TEXAS: FIXING
CHARGES AND LIENS AGAINST THE OWNERS THEREFORE;
PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND
THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE
THEREOF; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE RIGHT
TO ALLOW CREDITS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE
RESPECTIVE ASSESSMENT TO THE EXTENT OF ANY' CREDIT
GRANTED; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND
ENROLL THE ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN
THE MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HIllS,
TEXAS, AND BY FILING THE ORDINANCE IN THE ORPINANCE
RECORDS OF SAID CITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. II
Councilman Thomas moved, se~onded by Councilwoman Groves, to
approve Ordinance No. 947.
.'
Motion carried 6-0.
Mayor Faram stated he would like to thank the City Government
of Watauga for giving North Richland Hills the authority to
proceed with this street improvement.
Mayor Anthony of Watauga stated that he felt both cities were
in agreement. Mayor Anthony stated he would like to thank
the North Richland Hills City Council for listening to the
Watauga citizens.
t1arCh 22~ 1982
Page 10
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE APPROVI~'t"'
AND ADOPTING ESTI ES
OF THE COST OF IMPROVE-
MENTS AND AMOUNTS TO
BE ASSESSED FOR
IMPROVEMENTS ON RUFE
SNOW DRIVE
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 946
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE CLOSING
HEARING AND LEVYING
ASSESSMENTS FOR A
PORTION OF RUFE ~
DRIVE
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 947
Mayor Faram stated he also extended his thanks to Mr. Harrison.
.
Councilman Ramsey stated he felt t1ayor Faram was to be commended
for his time and efforts put forth on this project.
Councilman Ramsey stated he felt there were a lot of
citizens that owed Mayor Faram their gratitude.
Councilman Ramsey stated that he wanted to personally
.express his appreciation to Mayor Faram.
Mayor Faram called a recess.
Mayor Faram called the meeting back to order. The
same Council Members and Staff were present as recorded
at the beginning of the meeting.
17. Mr. Line stated the staff recommended the bid be awarded
to Alexander & Alexander and Crawford, Mitchell and
Thomas as indicated. The Council needed to authorize
$100,987.00 for a year period. Mr. Line stated the
Council also needed to authorize $22,177.00 from the
General Fund to cover the initial cost to implement
this plan.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Freeman,
to approve the staff's recommendation and authorize
the expenditure.
.
Councilman Kenna stated the insurance plan was put together
by Councilman Freeman 'and Mr. Bill Burk and felt the
city owned them a real thanks. Councilman Kenna stated
he wanted to also thank Ron McKinney for the fine job he
did on the insurance.
Councilman Hubbard stated that with the insurance plan would
be a savings to the city of $111,655.00 during the next
three years.
Councilman Freeman stated Mr. Burk had spent many hours
reviewing the insurance and working with the staff, he
would like for the city to recognize t·1r. Burk.
Mr. Line stated a resolution could be presented to Mr. Burk
at the next Council meeting.
.'
18. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Thomas, to
approve Ordinance No. 948.
Motion carried 5-1; Councilmen Kenna, Thomas, Hubbard,
Ramsey, and Freeman voting for; Councilwoman Groves
voting against.
.
March 22, 1982
Page 11
RECESS
BACK TO ORDER
CONSIDERATION OF
BIDS FOR CITY
INSURANCE
CONSIDERATION OF
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING
SPEED ZONES ON DAVIS
BOULEVARD
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 947
19. Mr. Line stated the Council would approve the plans and
bids that would be submitted for this project.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Groves,
to approve the refurbishing of Johnson and College Hills
ground storage tanks.
Motion carried 6-0.
20. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve payment to Austin Road Company in the amount
of $41,242.05, Booth Calloway.
Motion carried 6-0.
21. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by ·Councilwoman Groves,
to approve payment to Austin Road Company in the amount
of $4,399.12 for Rufe Snow Drive.
Motion carried 6-0.
22. Mr. Line stated the report summarized most of the
activity on the drainage improvements in the city at the
present time. The report also gives the status of
some of the major projects in various stages of preparation
that had not yet begun. Mr. Line stated the staff recommended
approval by the Council for authorization to obtain bids or
proposals from Aerial Photographing mapping companies for
city wide topographic mapping, which is needed to give the
engineerinq firm the tools to develop the next phase, an
overall master drainage plan.
Mr. Line stated the Staff also asked for authorization to
negotiate a contract with the engineering firm to develop
the drainage master plan that was needed for guidance for
future growth in the city.
Mr. Line stated the proposals would be brought back to
the Council for approval and appopriation of funds to cover
the cost.
.#
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
authorize the staff to proceed with the proposals, one with
respect to photographic maps and the other to work with
the consulting engineering firm for a master drainage project.
r1arch 22, 1.982
Page 12
CONSIDERATION OF
APPROVING REFURBt-"INC
JOHNSON AND COLLL -
HILLS GROUND STORAGE
'TANKS
'APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT~
ESTIMATE #9, TO AUSTIN
ROAD COMPANY IN THE
At10UNT OF $41 ,242.05
BOOTH CALLOWAY ROAD
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAYMENT,
ESTIMATE #4, TO AUSTI~
ROAD COMPANY IN THE
AMOUNT OF $4,399.12
RUFE SNOW DRIVE
APPROVED
.
.
.'
.
.
Motion carried 6-0.
Mr. McEntire stated that in connection with the above
item, there was a sub-item which deals with a resolution
to authorize eminent domain procedures on Hazel Sonricker,
T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, for drainage
improvements.
Councilman Freeman moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard,
to approve the resolution.
Motion carried 6-0.
23. None.
24. Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of March 22, 1982.
r1a rch 22, 1982
Page 13
CONSIDERATION OF
RESOLUTION ON
'Et1INENT DOr~AIN
PROCEDURES
APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO. 82-9
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
ADJOURNMENT
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
·
City of ~rth Richland Hills, Texas
I ¡ i
'" f!\ <#
"~~~ ! v/
-~:;~-;*~~-:,~
p \! ¡~,
u
y
April 8, 1982
PUBLIC NOTICE
There will be a worksession of the City Council and Planning and
Zoning Commission, April 13, 1982, 6:00 p.m., in the City Hall,
7301 Northeast Loop 820.
ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION:
·
1. Review and Discussion on Proposed
Master Plan
.~zt.v
~J
,
,
·
(817) 281-0041 ./ 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 " P. O. BOX 13305 NORTH RICHLAND HI
.
.
.'
.
DATE: April 8. 1982
SUBJECT:
Resolution-Canvassing Election
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND:
This resolu~io~~~~es the votes cast at the election
of Arpil 3, 1982~ and declares the winner.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION I~EQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove
BUDGETED ITEM.:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
~~~-~~-~~-~~~~~~~-~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~-~~~~-~~-~~-~-~~~~-~-~-~--~~-~~~~~~~~~~~
.
RESOLUTION NO. 7)j. I 0
WHEREAS, an Election was duly held in the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, on the 3rd day of April, 1982, to elect a Mayor and Council
Places 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; and 7; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor' and City Council duly canvassed the votes of
said election on this the 12th day of April, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the canvass showed the following results:
Candidates Office Total
Dick Faram Mayor 1003
Nancy Strauser 524
Marie Hinkle Council Place 1 993
Lyle Welch 504
Jim Kenna Council Place 2 1166
Bob Brady Write-In 3
Jim Woverton Write-In 1
Mickey Mouse Write-In 1
Richard Davis Council Place 3 856
. Janis Fréeman 635
J. c. Hubbard Council Place 4 1117
Bob Brady Write-In 3
Dennis Albritton Write-In 1
George Spurlock Write-In 1
Jeanette Moore Write-In 1
Dick Fisher Council Place 5 1088
Anthony Souders 358
Jim Ramsey Council Place 6 l142
Bob Brady Write-In 3
Floyd Gray Wri te- In . 1
Harold Newman Council Place 7 918
Lee Anne Lamond 565
.'
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
I.
The above canvass be and the same is hereby in all things approved.
.
2.
The Council finds that the following candidates should be declared
elected to the office indicated:
.
.
.'
.
Office
Mayor
Council Place 1
Council Place 2
Council Place 3
Council Place 4
Council Place 5
Council Place 6
Council Place 7
Duly Elected Official
Dick Faram
Marie Hinkle
Jim Kenna
Richard Davis
J. C. Hubbard
Dick Fisher
Jim Ramsey
Harold Newman
Passed and approved this 12th day of-April, 1982.
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
Dick Faram, Mayor
.
.
~,
.
DATE: 1\pril 8. 1982
¿
SUBJECT:
Oath of Office
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND:
Administration
Rex McEntire, City At~orney, will adrninister the Oath of Office.
CITY COUNCIL ~CTION I~EQUIRED:
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
~~~~-~~~~~~~---~-~~--~~~~-~--~-~~-~-~--~~~~~~~-~--~~~~~~--~-~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~-~-~~-
.
.
!
.
OATH OF OFFICE
I,
,do solemnly swear (or affirm),
that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of (City Councilman/
Councilwoman or Mayor) of the City of North Richland Hills, State of Texas,
and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, ~rotect, and defend the
Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State; and I furthermore
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I have not directly paid, offered, or promised
to pay, con~ributed .nor promised to- contribute any money, or valuable thing,
or promised any public office or employment as a reward for the giving or
withholding a vote at the election at which I was elected. So help me God.
Sworn to and subscribed before me the 12th day of April, 1982.
Notary Public in and for Tarrant County,
Texas
.
.
.'
.
DATE:
Arr; 1 8;7 1 982
SUBJECT:
E1PCt'ion of Mayor 'Pro 'rprn ,
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND: Council membeI~~~~ their nomiua~io~ auð tnp vorp y;lJ bp
by secret ballot.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQlTIRED:
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
~~~~~-~--~~~~~~~~~~~-~-~~~~~~-~--~~~~~~~-~~-~~~--~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~
.
i..
.'
.
."
DATE:
April 8.. 1982' . .
SUBJECT:
Resolution for Mr. Bill Burk
DEPAR~lENT: Administrative
BACKGROUND: Mr. Bill Burk offered his time and expertise to the City as· an insurance
consultant to assure that the City would purchase the best insurance coverage at the
best price. Because of Mr. Burk's advise in developing bid specifications and his
subsequent recommendations to the Council, the City will realize a savings of over
$100,000 during the next three years.
The attached Resolution recognizes Mr. Burk and his outstanding
contribution to the City.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQlTIRED:
Public Reading of a~tached Resolution.
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
N/A
NO
~-------------~~----------~------~--~--~~-~~~-~----------~------~-~~--~--~-~~--------
.
) / \ \
RESOLUTION ¿¿
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, must maintain
adequate insurance protection to prevent any liabilities or losses incurred
by the City from becoming an unnecessary burden to its' taxpayers; and
WHEREAS, the costs to provide such insurance is rising annually at
an alarming rate; and
WHEREAS, the time had come to renew the City's insurance policies;
and
"WHEREAS, the City desired to obtain the best insurance coverage
at the best price; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bill Burk, a Citizen of North Richland Hills and a
member of the insurance profession, provided his professional advice and
guidance at no cost to the City; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bill Burk's recommendations based upon his review of
the City's insurance needs and his evaluation of the bids that were received
will save the taxpayers more than $100,000 during th~ next three years; now
4IÞ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, hereby recognizes and commends Mr. Bill Bark
and extends its appreciation on behalf of all of the Citizens of North
Richland Hills for his good citizenship and outstanding service to the
City.
Passed and approved this
day of
, 1982.
Dick Fa~am - Mayor
City of North Richland Hills
ATTEST:
.'
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
.
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
DATE: April 8, 1982"
..
SUBJECT:
Appointment to Board of Adjustment
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: Due to the resig~ion of Marie Hinkle there is a vacancy on
the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Martin Erck has been serving as alternate
on the Board. Councilman Ramsey has recommended that Mr. Erck be a ointed
to replace Marie Hinkle.
.
,
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQlTIRED: Approve/Disapprove
~
.' BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-
.
.
.'
.
DATE: Apri'l 8, 1982
SUBJECT:
Re-appoi.ntment of Library Commission Members
DEPARTMENT: Library
BACKGROUND: The terms of Library Commission members, Mrs. Polly Brinkley,
Mrs. Jan Daniels, ~1rs. Lynn Q'Day and Rev. Ron Smotherman will expire in May.
They have been contacted and wish to serve another term on the Commissîon. . This
will be a two year term.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION IlEQLTIRED:
Approve/Disapprove
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
~~~~-~-~~~~~~--~~~~~~-~--~~~--~~~~~-----~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~-~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~-~~-
... .~
·
City Of~rth Rich1and Hills, Texas
-~-::::.-- ~ ,
March 24, 1982
REF: LDM0077-82
To: Rodger N. Line
From: Tiffany Nourse
Re: Reappointment of Commission Members
The Library Commission terms of Polly Brinkley, Jan Daniels, Lynn
O'Day and Rev. Ron Smotherman will expire shortly. They have all
expressed a willingness to serve another two-year term (1982-84).
If this meets with the approval of Mayor Faram, I would like to
request that reappointment letters be sent to them. (Addresses
included below.)
· Mrs. Polly Brinkley
6525 Wood Creek Lane
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Mrs. Jan Daniels
5409 Scott Drive
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Mrs. Lynn O'Day
5017 Eldorado
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Rev. Ron Smotherman
7725 Deaver Drive
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
~,
·
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
.
'.
.'
.'
.
City of J;(ðrth RichIand Hills, Texas
_31lkL
-., I
!
ME~10 TO:
FROM:
Rodger N. Line
City Manager
~Janda Ca 1 vert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
DATE: April 7, 1982
SUBJECT:
P & Z Cases to be heard by City Council April 12~ 1982
PS 82-5
Approved by P & Z
PZ 82-3
Postponed by Council 3-22-82
Approved by P & Z
(4 were contacted)
Request of Frederick Culp for final·
plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Culp Addition. .
Request of The Cambridge Companies, Inc.
and Crossroads Development, Ltd. to
rezone Blocks 2 & 3, Snow Heights North
Addition, & Tracts 284, 2D, & a portion
of Tract 2A, Abst. 1606, \4.\"J. tJallace
Survey, from their present classification
of Local Retail to a proposed classifi-
cation of Commercial.
This property is located on the north side
of N. E. Loop 820, bounded on the east by
Reynolds Drive~ and is parallel to the
TESCO right-af-way.
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHU,ND HilLS, TEXAS 76118
To see Maps with Agenda:
Please contact City
Secretary's Office /
Municipal Records
.
.
.'
.
DATE: Apri'l 7. 1982
SUBJECT: PS 82-5 Final plat of Lot 1~ Block 1~ Culp Addition
DEPARTMENT: Planninq and ZoninQ
BACKGROUND: Mr. Culp want~to build a 40' X 50' metal storaqe buildinq on his
prODertv~ but his property had never been platted. I am enclosinq the minutes of the
P & Z wh~re they ap,proved the preliminary plat. Item #3 of the Cit~ Enqineer's letter
dªted Oecember 29. 1981 stated Mr. Culp would be required .to extend the 12" water &
sewer lines and install a fire hvd·rant. Mr. Culp stated this would be a financial
strain since he is just wanting to build such a small building.
Mr~ Culp has already signed a covenant for "the pro rata.
The Planning & Zoning Commission approved the preliminar.¥ plat and waived item #3 with
the stipulation that at such time the water & sewer is available that Mr. Culpwould
extend it to his property.
The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the final ~lat with a vote of
4 to 1 with Mr. Hannon voting against.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION IŒQUIRED: ....ßP.proval or denial of final plat. .
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
N/A
NO X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(~J
CO
.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
MÀRCH 25, 1982 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the
Chairman, Carl Greenfield, at 7:30 P. M.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
CHAIRMAN
SECRETARY
MEMBERS
Carl Greenfield
Marjorie Nash
Don Bowen
George Tucker
Mark Hannon
DIRECTOR OF
DEVELOPMENT
P & Z COORDINATOR
Allen Bronstad
Wanda Calvert
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF FEBRUARY 25, 1982
Mr. Tucker moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash,
to approve the minutes as written.
This motion carried 5-0.
1.
PS 82-5
Request of Frederick Culp for final plat
o~. Lot 1~ Block 1, Culp Addition.
Delbert Stembridge, Consu1ting Engineer,
came forward to represent Mr. Culp in his
request.
.
PS 82-5
APPROVED
Mr. Stembridge said they came in last
month with the preliminary plat and there
was an agreement regarding the water line.
Mr. Tucker said the Commission discussed
this requirement and the Commission waived
that requirement with the stipulation that
at the- time water is available that Mr. Culp
wi'll participate.
Mr. Stembridge said that was correct.
Mr. Tucker moved to approve PS 82-5
,
;
This motion was seconded by Mrs. Nash and
the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Hannon
voting against..
.
(
( .
..
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS)
JANUARY 28, 1982 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the
Chairman) Carl. Greenfield, at 7:30 P. M.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
CHAIRMAN
SECRETARY
MEMBERS
COUNCILMAN
DIRECTOR OF
DEVELOPMENT
P.&· Z COORDINATOR
. ABSENT:
MEMBER
Carl G,reenfield
Marjorie Nash
Don BO'l/en
George Tucker
Jim Ramsey
Allen Bronstad
Wanda Calvert
Mark Hannon
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF DECEMBER 17) 1981
Mrs. Nash moved~ seconded by Mr. Bowen~ to
approve the minutes as written.
f. .
This motion carried 4-0.
,
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
JANUARY 5) 1982
Mr. Bowen moved~ seconded by Mr. Tucker~ to
approve the minutes as written.
The mati'on carried 4-0.
NEW BUSINESS
1.
PS 81-69
Request of Fredrick D. Cu1p for preliminary
plat of lot 1~ Block 1) Culp Additiqn.
.'
,
Delbert Stembridge~ Consulting Engineer~
came forward to represent Mr. Culp in his
reque~t. He said Mr. Culp's property was
located on Davis Blvd. just north of Main St.
Mr. Stembridge said Mr. Culp was platting
this property so he can comply \'/ith the City
Ordinances so he may obtain a building permit
for a 40 X 50 ft. storage building.
.
Mr. Stembridge said the City Engineer stated
in his letter that Mr. Culp has to extend the
12 inch water and sewer lines and install a
fire hydrant which would be a financial strain.
He said they are requesting the Comrnission
approve this request without this requirement.
Page 2
p & Z Minutes
January 28, 1982
I
\,
PS 81-69
APPROVED
Mr. Tucker moved to approve PS 81-69
and to waive item #3 with the stipulation .
that at such time the water and sewer is
available that Mr. Culp wouJd extend to
his property.
This motion was seconded by Mrs. Nash
and the motion carried 4-0.
'YIL _r.... 2. ~ ___n~4pz. 81~4~-=-~~- Requëst of ·Chll i's Inc. to rezone Tract
1tA2) Abstract 1606) W. W. Wallace Survey)
from its present classification of
Commercial to a proposed classificatio 'of
Commercial-Specific Use-Sale of Alco ic
Beve~ges. (Lot 4) Blk. 2) Cochr~Addn.).
Thi s property is located on the . uth side
. of Bedford Eul ess Road and i s ~ unded on
the east by Jamie's Restaur .~. .
Marian Massey, Attorney ~ ame forward. He
said he \.¡as representi g the O\·mer ) Bryan
Anderson and Bob Uhl~r with Chili IS.
Mr. r~1assey said." e property in question ;s
the old sub-c_· ·rthouse. He said they plan
to level th - existing building and com~ bac.
in \'ith t.;· i'r floor plan and build a nlce
restaur ,~ t on ,,,hat is now known as "Restaurant
Row It ~ ....
.I
r .'. Massey satd they are requesting Specific
se zoning for the sale of alcoholic beverages.
Mr. Massey stated that somehow this property
was never platted so they are also here for
the platting..."
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor of
this request to please come fon'lard'.
There being no one~ the Chairman called for
those wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to' speak> the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
PZ 81-43
APPROVED
Mr. Tucker moved to approve PZ 81-43.
Thi s moti on \'/aS seconded by Mr. ßO\'len and i.
motion carried 4-0.
. ~~~~~1Jf....;.. ~'It...L~ !4J_.b.$I...t.L4
:;a1t'~ AI ~~.!4·_Uþ.A_~tJJr!.~.f'~f_....~~......)4:~~~m_, _... ... _ ,
L '1 ~L~ WI 11 11111 lJ
..
(
.
Delbert R. Stembridge
consulting engineer
March 9, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lot 1, Block 1, CULP ADDITION,
PS 82-5, Final Plat.
.In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated February 25,
1982, we offer the following comments:
Items 1 & 2
.
The owner of this tract is willing to sign a covenant agreement
to participate in future water system extensions ín Davis Blvd.
at such time that these improvements are constructed. (A letter
cQvenånt sighed by Mr. Culp is attached).
We would refer you to our ~omments regarding Mr. Cu1p's plan
for this tract. Our letter, dated January 15, 1982, mentioned
Mr. Cu1p's plan to erect a small metal storage building to
house metal sign supplies. To pro,vide fire protection to this
tract would require Mr. Culp to construct approximately 1000 L.F.
of water line, along with related gate valves, fire hydrants,
street bores, and pavement replacement (estimated cost of this
water line extension = $15,500).
The owner believes that an expenditure of this magnitude would
be unreasonable for the type of expansion he plans. Should
. there be any utility improvements in this area in the future,
the owner is agreeable to participating with his pro rata share
of the cost.
,If there should be any further questions regarding this tract, please
! do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
i'"
\
.
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
. Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
3729 Florv. North Rlchland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-1363
(
(
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
February 25, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 9-939~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CULP ADDITION,
PS 82-5, FINAL PLAT, (GRID (79)
We have reviewed the referenced. materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. We would refer you to our comments concerning lack of
proper fire hydrant coverage protection in Items 2 and 3
of our letter, dated December 29, 1981.
l.
2. If the suggested requirement to extend a 12-inch water
line in Davis Blvd. to service this property is waived, we
would recommend that the Developer be required to sign a
covenant agreement to participate in future water system
extensions in Davis Blvd. at such time that. these improve-
ments are constructed.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hestiate to call.
'-
.'
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA :mh
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-621'. METRO/267-3367
.
.
~,
.
(
C
\
KNOWLTON-ENGLiSH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINfEI{S / Fort Worth-Dallas
December 29~ 1981
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas
76118
3-939, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
lOT 1, BLOCK 1, CULP ADDITION,
PS 81-69, GRID 79, PRELIMINARY PLANS
Re:
l~e have revie~'led the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the' following comments:
1. We would note that this subdivision is adjacent to a plat previously
submitted as the Ðalworth Industrial Park Addition, which was
denied approval by the Council. However, the Ðalworth Industrial
Park plans included water, sewer and storm drainage construction
which this submittal does not include. This addition is presently
. served by a 2-inch water line in Ðavis Blvd. and an on-site septic
. sewer system.
2. As this lot, which is zoned industrial, developes, the present water
and sewer systems \'/hich serve this lot may be insufficient to
handle industrial-type demands. Fire protection coverage has not
been provided, and we would discourage the continued use of the
existing septic sewerage system unless the Developer can demonstrate
to the City's satisfaction that such existing faciliti·es are sufficient
to support the future needs o'f this subdivision.
3. As indicated in our Dalworth Industrial Park review letter dated
April 2, 1981, we \'lOuld recommend that a 12-inch \'/ater line along
the east right-of-way line of Ðavi.s Blvd. be extended northward
from ~,1ain Street to provide adequate fire protection coverage of this
lot and adequate water service to meet industrial type demands.
The Fire Chief has indicated that a minimum 12-inch line is required
for fire protection to industrial areas, therefore, City participation
in this line would not appear to be necessary. An additional minimum
8-inch water line extension within this development from the proposed
12-inch line in Davis Blvd. along with dedicated utility easements
would be required to provide a 30Q-foot radius of fire coverage
to the existing bUildings along with future structures in this
subdivision.
4. Any construction \"/ithin the Davis Blvd. right-of-\.¡ay should be
approved by the Highway Department.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283..621,. METRO/267-3367
(
\
('
\-
Page 2, ,Planning & Zoning Comrnis'sion, December 29, 1981
5. Utility companies should be consulted regarding their needs for
possible additional easement dedications in this subdivision.
. ,.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
pleas~ do not hesitate to call.
~~
R\~A/ljc
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
:'
.
.
.
.
.
.'
.
DATE:
April 8, 1982
!{i/"
S'UBJECT:
Planning & Zoning - PZ 82-3
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: This request__~~~poned at the March 22, 1982, meeting. The Council
was concerned about the number of undesirable uses that was allowed in'còmmercial
zoning,. Attached is a letter from Cambridge Company agreeing to deed restrictions
on the property. The Ordinance Number was assigned at the March 22~ 1982 meetin~.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQtTIRED:
Approve/Disapprove
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
.
.'
.
f
I
\,
DA~"':
\
March 16, 1982 .
SUBJECT: PZ 82-3 Zoning request from Local Retail to Commercial on Blocks 2 & 3,
Snow Heights North Addition, & Tracts 2B4, 20, & a portion of Tract 2A,
Abstract 1606~ W.W. Wallace Survey.
DEPARTMENT: Planning and ZQninq
BACKGROUND: This ~roperty is loca~ed on the north side of N.E. Loop 820, bounded on
the east by Reynolds Drive, and is ~arallel to the TESCO right-of-way.
The Cambridge Co. wishes to have hotel-motel and mixed office use with one story and
multi story. They need the Commercial' zoning to allow the multi story.
There were 4 property owners contacted but no onè contested ,this request.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request.
CITY COUNCIL ~CTION ItEQUIRED:'
Approval or denial of zoning request.
BUDGETED ITEM:
NO X
YES
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
..2J~ (]~
~-~--~---~-~~--~-~~~-~~~~-~--~~---~--~~~~-~~~--~~_._~~~~----~-~~~-~~--~--~~-~~~~-~~~~
Page 6
P & Z Minutes
February 25, 1982
(
..
to a proposed classification of Commercial.
This property is located on the north side
of N. E. Loop 820, bounded on the east by
~eynolds Drive, and is parallel to the
T.E.S.C.O. right-af-way.
Neil Cukerbaum came forward to represent
The Cambridge Companies, Inc. in their
request. He said they have 12 acres for
a shopping center and they want to expand
the retail from 12 acres to 18 acres.
Mr. Cukerbaum said they want to have hotel-
motel and mixed office use with one story .
and multi story. He said they would tie
the property together with roads.
'. Mr. Cukerbaum said the reason for the
zoning change was the two story limitation
in Local Retail zoning.
:.
,.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor
of this request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, the
Chairman called for those wishing to speak
in opposition "to this request to please
come forward.
PZ 82-3
APPROV ED
There being no one wishing to speak, the
Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Hannon moved to approve PZ 82-3
This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and
the motion carried 5-0.
9.
PZ 82-4
Request of Burk Collins and Tommy La
Chinese Restaurant to rezone lon
Lot 3RB, Block 25, Clea Addition,
from its present lfication of Local
Retail to osed classification of
Loca ail-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic
erages.
This property is located on Grapevine Hwy.
just north of North Hills Animal Clinic.
.'
Burk Collins came forward. He said he was
requesting this Specific Use for a Chinese
Restaurant.
-rt"t' l......ìtL~,.:.,;.....ll\,;~~id:1:l·... L\.:\\.1\'11I.\..11! l--"'q't,:,'lil.,)n
"1:J)~~' \\\,!t~:P\"~ f)rÎ,'e, ~lIitt: 120 [\dl:1~t Texas ¡52iS Tl'1cI,hpl)t: 214 931 ï311
.
[~~~~l~
~___ _-=:1
.
"
.
\C2/6/1
Mr. Rodger ~ine
Ci ty }'J.3nager
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
March 31, 1982
RE: Zoning case on approximately 38 acres on the northeast
corner of Rufe Snow Road and Loop 820 in North Richland
Hills, Texas
Dear Mr. Line:
Per our meeting in your office yesterday and at the request
of the Ci ty Council, we will agree to a re-zoning of the
above referenced property from Local Retail to Commercial
with a deed restriction filed contingent upon the re-zoning
to exclude the following uses permitted in C Zoning under
your current ordinance:
1. Used auto parts, sales in building.. (This does not
exclude retail auto parts stores.)
2. Tire retreading and capping.
3. Bottling works.
4. Cleaning and dyeing plant - commercial.
5. Cleaning plant, carpet and bags (with special equipment).
6. Contractor's shop and storage yard.
7. Dance hall, public.
8. Drive-in theatre.
9. Engine and motor repairing. (So long as this would not
restrict us from a Firestone or Western Auto type store
where car repairs are done.)
10. Feed store.
11. Heavy machinery sales and storage.
12. Job printing. (This would ~ot exclude speedy print
offices such as those normally found in office buildings
or shopping centers.)
13. Laundry and dry cleaning plant (commercial).
14. Mîlk depot, dairy or ice cream plant.
15. Newspaper printing.
16. Paint shop. (I assume this is not referring to retail
paint stores.)
17. Plumbing sþop.
18. Railroad or bus passenger station.
19. Railroad team track, freight depot and docks.
20. Storage and sale of furniture and appliances outside a
building.
21. Transfer, storage and baggage terminal.
II
~ ....
.
.
.'
.
." .
.
,-
\
i
'"
'.
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
February 9, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Subject: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
ZONING PLAT REVIEW, PZ 82-3,
lR TO COMM., (GRID 121)
We have received the subject zoning case for our review and find that
we could adequately locate this property on the zoning map should it
be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
R\~A/l j c
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK ~LDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
~ ...
( .
.
.
.'
.
ORDINANCE· NO.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH, ARTICLE' XXIX CHA1~GES AND ÞJ'1END.~ENTS.. .
SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE #179. ZONING ORD¡NAN~E
OF . THE· ·CITY OF t10RTH' RICHLAND HILLS·. T.EXAS,
.PASSED. APPROVED~ AHD AOOPTED:BY THE'PLANMINû
AND IONING.COMMISSIQN AND THE CITY COUNCIL Of
·THE CITY OF NORTH. RICHLAND HILL$. NOVE~ßER 13,
1967. AS ~~ENDED·JANUARY.27. 1975
AFTER APPROPRIATE'" HOTlèE AND' PUBLIC H~RING THE FOLL~ING. RECOMMENDATION 15
SUBMITTED TO THE' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 9F NORTH ~IC~LAND HILLS BY rH~
P~~NING AND ZONI~G CO~~ISSION~
. .
RESOLVED that on 'ease No. PI 82-3 , the folloWing describ~d prop!l"ty shall.
be . rezoned froni. Local·Retà;l:··J·a·..············:I#····:···,~~·::··l ··to
Co mme rc i a l' . ' . ...'. . . · '...: . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ' . . .' . ~ ' " ~
SITUATED in the City of .Nor~h Richland Hills, Tarrant .County~ Texas, and being
Blocks 2 & 3 of Snow Hei'ghts North, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume
388-44, Page.99, of the Plat Records of Jarrant County, Texas, and being a portion
of the W.W. Wall~ce Survey, Abstract 1606, and being more parti.cularly described
. by metes and bounds as follows:' .: .
BEGINNING at. an ; ran rO,d ,i n the North 1 i ne óf Interstate Hi ghway Loop' 820, sai d
point beingt~e Sout~west corner of said Block 2 of Snow Heights North;
THENCE North 0 degrees 48 minutes East, 175.0 feet to an iron rod at the North-
east corner ·of Block 4, of Snow Heights North;
THENCE South 88 degrees 25 minutes West, 33~74 feet to an iron rod at'th~ most
Westerly cor~er.of said Block 2; .
THENCE North 66.degrees 27 minutei East along the South~~ly line of the Texas
Electric Service Company's right~of-way, 1858.15 feet;
. .
THENCE East 619.11 feet to a point in the West line of Reynolds .Drive, .said point
being on a curve whose center bears South 72 degrees 22 minutes 03 seconds West)
676.51 feet; . .
THENCE Southeasterly along said curve and with the West line of' Reynolds Drive)
194.8 feet·to the end'of said curve;
THENCE South 1 degree 08 minutes East) 517.1 feet with the West line of Reynolds Dr.;
THENCE South 0 degrees 21 minutes West with the West line of Reynolds Drive, 374.5
feet to the beginning of a curve whose center bears North 89 degrees 39 minutes
West) 294.86 feet; .
THENCE Southerly along said curve and with the West line of Reynolds Drive) 90.06
feet to the end of said curve;
.
.
~,
-
DATE: April 8, 1982
SUBJECT:
Appeal Hearing - PZ 82-6
DEPAR~1ENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: Mr. Stembrid~e is requesting the Council to grant an aDDeal
hearing on PZ 82-6 that was denied by the Planning & Zoning Commission
March 25, 1982. If the Council grants the appeal hearing it should be
set for ~Mav 10.. 1982. This will meet·-th~ l~ .day 'tPqui-rpm~nr far adyetti~;ÎJ1g. .
and notification of property owners within 200 fèet of the property.
CITY COUNCIL ~CTION REQUIRED:
Approve/Disapprove
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
~~~-~-~~~~~--~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~-~--~-~----~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~-~~~~~---~~--~-~-~~~--~~~~~
.
.
.'
-
Delbert R. Stembridge
consulting engineer
March 31, 1982
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Zoning request for Lots 1 & 2,
Block 14, Glenann Addition,
5th Filing.
Dear Mr. Line:
On Thursday, March 25, 1982, the application requesting a zoning
change for these two lots, from Ag. to IF-9, was heard and denied
by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The owner, Mr. Lee Sattawhite, was unable to attend the meeting.
Mr. Sattawhite would like to appeal to the City Council for approval
of this zoning change, and would like to have this request placed
on the City Council agenda at the earliest possible date.
Sincerely,
~~~,~~~~_~o'
De er R. S~~, P.E. .
DRS/et
cc: Mrs. Walter Silay
3729 Flory. North Rlchland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-1363
4-8-82 .
DATE:
"
SUBJECT:
Topographic Mapping
..
..
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
BACKGROUND:
Richard Albin and I have obtained propos~ls from four (4) firms
who have shown an interest in providing contour maps for our City.
Richard has provided a detailed outline of the proposals and our recommendation
on which one would provide the greatest benefit to the City for the cost
involved.
(See attach'ed outline)
.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION I~EQ1JIRED:
Consider award of contract to Oallqs A~rial SUl:VE;YSt
Inc. for $39.800 for a total project completion time of 180 days.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT N1J}-IBER:
Gener
~ -------------------~-----~~'~- -
/~
.
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort vVorth-[)allas
Apri 1 8, 1982
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-200, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
CITY-WIDE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
.'
In accordance with your instructions to us in the regular council meeting
of March 22, 1982, we have obtained proposals from four (4) aerial
topographic mapping firms for your consideration of Contract award. A
summary tabulation showing the various proposals submitted along with
proposal letters from each firm are enclosed for your review.
The purpose of this project is to obtain 111 = 200 foot scale, 2-foot
contour interval topographic grid map sheets of the entire City of
North Richland Hills for use in preparing a comprehensive drainage master
plan study required to identify potential flooding areas and propose plans
of improvement. These maps will also serve as invaluable tools for all
types of City development and construction planning. Part of the cost of this
topographic map preparation can be recovered by selling copies of these maps
to Developers for their use in subdivision planning.
We would recommend that this Contract be awarded to Dallas Aerial Surveys, Inc.,
for Proposal Item B.l in the amount of $39,800 for a total project completion
time not to exceed 180 calendar days. This proposal includes the preparation
of about 36 grid sheets showing all roads, streets, highways, railroads, creeks,
major drains, dams, tanks, bridges, culverts, buildings, houses, fences, power
poles, outline of timber areas, cross-county power and pipelines, swimming
pools and parking lots, etc., along with topographic contours at 2-foot
intervals with spot elevations at intersections and high points. The
topographic maps will be prepared on 3611X2411 mylar reproducible sheets.
This proposal also provides for 111 = 500' scale negatives to be used in
preparing the grid maps. The 500 scale negatives will assure greater
horizontal and vertical accuracy, and this scale is the same scale as the
City's overlay mapping system which includes the official city base map,
zoning map, water system and sewer system maps. Contact prints can be made
from the 500 scale negatives to aid in updating these overlay maps.
We would further recommend that the preparation of photo film positives not
be included in this co'ntract at this time since aerial photos such as these
can be obtained from the Tarrant County Appraisal District later this year when
this work is completed by their consultants, Williams-Stackhouse, Inc.
.
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
.
Page 2 -- Honorable Mayor and City Council -- April 8~ 1982
Based on the proposals submitted, we would recommend that this aerial
topographic mapping contract be awarded to Dallas Aerial Surveys~ Inc.,
10220 Forest Lane, Dallas~ Texas 75243, for $39)800 for a delivery time
not to exceed 180 calendar days.
We will be present at the April 12, 1982, Council Meeting to answer any
questions you may have concerning this project.
RWA:bvg
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Cecil Forester, 'Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
.
.'
.
. CITY-WIDE AERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING PROPOSALS
FOR THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
APRIL, 1982
DALLAS METROPOLITAN WILLIAMS- INTERNATIONAL
PROPOSAL AERIAL AERIAL STACKHOUSE AERIAL
SURVEYS SURVEYS INC. MJ\PPING
A. 111 = 200 I t4aps
with 2' contours
(no houses)
1. I" = 500' Neg. $34,800 '$33 ~205 $48,150
2. 111 = 630' Neg. * 28,205
3. I" = 800' Neg. 29,255
4. 1" = 1000' Neg. $39 ,300
ðeð (Co lor)
B.' I" = 200' Maps (It (, ('
t1"
with 2' contours ~t(,o
. (All Tapa)
1. 111 = 500' Neg. $52' ,295 $56,960
2. 1" = 630 I N eg . * 47,295
3. I" = 800' Neg. 32,255
4. I" = 1000' Neg.
c. I" = 200 I Ma ps
with 51 contours
(no houses)
lit = 1000' Neg. $24,560 $29)200 $25,535
-
c. 1" = 200' Maps
with 5' contours
(All Tapa) , $29,800 $43,650 $27,825
1" = 1000' Neg.
D. Photo Film
, Positives $ 2,200 $ 2,160 $ 1,000 $ 3,150
E. Estimated
Delivery Time 180 120 90 to 120 90
(Days) *180
.
·
.'
-
Dallas 4A~fi=1 Sllr~@:Js~ 1116:.
Aerial Photography and Mapping Services
ROUTING
JOB NO.
FILING
RLK lLG
KEE DEM
SPF
RWA MER
DHC WAS
GWF DRW,
March 30, 1982
Honorable Mayor and City Council
North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Sirs and/or Madams:
Our proposal for furnishing aerial topographic mapping for the City
of Nórth Richland Hills is as follows:
We will perform all flying, ground control surveys, three-dimension
stereo plotting, drafting and reproductions as required to furnish
200' scale topographic maps.
We will provide mapping at 1"=200' with 2.0' contours using 1"=500'
negative scale. We will compile roads, railroads, houses, build-
ings, fences, power poles, transmission poles, " drainage features,
group tree outlines and contours for $39,800.00. Photo film posi-
tives will be furnished for $2,200.00.
We will provide mapping at 1"=200' with 5.0' contours using 1"=1000'
negative scale compiling the same features as listed above for
$29,800.00. Photo film positives will be furnished for $2,200.00.
To provide mapping at 1"=200' with 2.0' contours using 1"=800'
negative scale, compiling the same features as listed above, our
fee would be $32,255.00. Photo film positives will be furnished
for $ 2 , 200 . dO. ~ z ~ I Z 5 oS (1\0 h 0 t4 S ~ 5 ) ~ uJ A 4- .. ., - g z,
Delivery for either of the above proposals will be within 180 days.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and we look
forward to the possibility of working with you on this project.
Sincerely,
Bill
BLI /rnj
10220 Forest Lane near Skillman / Dalras, Texas 75243/ 214-349-2190
3- ~/-~-~
~ 5000 less
u.J " ., h ~ ~ i h [) ~ !. to .!
~""'^,.: ro "Ix: f' ¡>4J Ie..
RUJA
~-¡ -8"'1-
,/
./-,
.
A.
B.
c.
.'
D.
E.
F.
G.
.
Metropolitan Aerial Surveys
Box 2293
1225 fairmount Avenue 8/1-336-4381
fort Worth, Texas 7610/
1ro1rT11\~
JOB NO.
FILING
RlK
·KEE
BPF
RWA.
OtiC
GWF
W. F. Gunn
Ken Smith
LlG
CEM.
::iER
----
WAS
DRW
March 30', 1982
y., j I,~ ~.'
Honorable Mayor and City Council of
North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
We m~ke the following proposals for topographic and photographic mapping
of North Richland Hills with the boundaries being defined by the official map
of North Richland Hills, (being approximately 12,OOOaacres).
Proposal ;11
We will make a new aerial flight using a preC1SLon aerial camera at an
altitude so as to provide a photo scale of 1"=1000'.
We will furnish~ the neces~ary horizontal and vertical controls. Horizontal
control 'established shall originate from and tie into existing survey markers
of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Surveys in the vicinity and will have an accuracy
of second order or better. All coordinate computations shall be based on the
Texas State Coordinate System. All vertical control will originate from and tie
into existing bench marks of the U.S Coast and Geodetic Survey and/or other
competent agencies The map control will be collocated and expanded using a
Kern CPM-l comparater.
Using the describ~d~photography and. control we will compile. topographic
maps using a Wild B-8 precision stereo-plotter. The maps will have the following
content and/or characteristics:
Map shall be drawn at a scale of 1"=200'
Contours shall be shown at 5 foot intervals.
All roads, streets, highways, railroads, creeks, major drains) dams,
tanks, bridges, culverts, landmark buildings, outline of timbered areas,
cross-country power and pipelines, and major fences will be shown.
Grid lines shall be shown at 1000 foot intervals based on the Texas State
Coordinate System.
All drafting will be by the scribing process and will be of excellent
quality of workmanship. The finished map sheets shall be on mylar film.
Sheet size will be 24 x 36 inches with a map area of 20 x 30 inches, the
remaining area being used for border and title block purposes.
Photo film sheets will be produced to closely match the above mentioned
topographic sheets. (.$ 21 I (PO )
·
·
~,
·
Page 2
We will make the aerial flight as soon as possible after written
notification to proceed. Such work shall be completed and delivery of all
photo film sheets and topographic maps shall be made within 120 calendar
't'
days of the date of the contract. As the foliage on the trees have already
begun to develop, the' proper flying time for a contour mapping project has
already passed. Because of the current need for the maps) we could draw the
necessary maps, then if there are any contour gaps in the mapping area, we
will refly t~ese area in Decemb~r of 1982, and draw the necessary missing
contours.
The cost to render the above services will be Twenty-six Thousand,
Seven Hundred-Twenty Dollars, ($26,720.0Q).We will ask that payments be made
as work items are delivered to the City with fifteen percent (15%) of the
value of the work items delivered being retained by the City until all work
under the contract has been accepted by the City of North Richland Hills.
Proposal·fJ2
We will do all the aforementioned as in Proposal #1 except the contour
interval will be two foot (2') for the price of Thirty-five Thousand, Three
Hundred-Sixty-five Dollars, ($35,365.00). Two foot mapping shall be flown at
an altitude so as to provide a photo scale of 1"=500' .
" · 1
(p I"Y\ ø 1\4. \.. So P hÞ{O .s c þ. 'e I ::: '3.0 -? e 5 ~
4f.. ~ 0 ~ ~"S. 0 () f2.w A 4 _ 7 _ 8" 1..
Proposal #3
$SoC)o
We will do all the aforementioned as in Propo~al #1, also we will show all
visib1~ planimetric features on the photography, including items in Proposal HI
plus building$) houses, poles,. yard fences) swimming pools and parking lots.
The cost for this proposal will be Forty-five Thousand, Eight Hundred-
Ten Dollars, ($45,810.00).
Proposal 1;4
We will do aLl the aforementioned as in Proposal #3, except the contour
interval will be two foot (2') for the price of Fifty-four Thousand, Four
Hundred-Fifty-five Dollars, ($54,455.00). Two foot mapping shall be flown at
an altitude so as to provide a photo scale of 1"=500'. less fciC::>ð~ Fo(Z.
I ~ ~ ~ 30' ¿, ~ø"4 ~
If there are any questions or if add~tional information is needed, please
feèl free to call.
~C-AtE ::
£'30 -
Co Þ"V'\ 0 -
(Su. o..bove)
~ "2-0 0 0
u
$~OOO
I'
~
{. ~o 0 0
Yours truly,
Je~~
~~~
~~ ,-
Ken Smith
KWS/pag
WILLIAMS-STACKHOUSE INCORPORATED
P.O. BOX 17066 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78217
.
April 1, 1982
Mr. Richard W. Albin
Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc.
550 First State Bank Building
Bedford, ·Texas 76021
Re: Topographic Mapping for the City of North Richland Hills
Dear Mr. Albin:
In response to your recent request, we are pleased to furnish the following proposal for
mapping the City of North Richland Hills (approximately 12,000 acres).
A portion of this proposal is based upon using material our firm is contracted to prepare
for Tarrant Appraisal District. This material is owned exclusively by Tarrant Appraisal
District, and their permission for its use will be required.
PROPOSAL FOR 2' CONTOURS
. Aerial Photograph~
As soon as weather conditions permit, we will obtain new aerial photography of the City.
This will be taken at a scale of 1" = lQDO' (llQ.0' above ground), using a Wild RC-IO (3Y.z"
focal length) mapping camera. - ,- -- -====-
Due to foliage considerations at this time of year, we recommend that the photography
be taken in color, rather than black and white. This will help to provide our map com-
pilers with better visibility in those areas with heavy vegetation growth.
Although we acquired aerial photography of the same area in February of this-year, it
was taken from an altitude (7800') not suitable for mapping to a 2' accuracy. __
Field Control Surveys
.
Once the photography work is completed, we wjll mobilize a survey crew to the Rroject
area to obtain both horizontal and vertical control. ~
.'
The horizontal control will be established utilizing second order survey techniques, and
will be referenced to the Texas State Plane Coordinate System.
.
General Offices
2118 MA~NIX DRIVE
512/824-6301
Engineering Divisio'1
2119 MANNIX DRIVE
512/828-9525
AERIAL SURVEYS . TOPOGRAPHIC & DIGITAL MAPPING . ENGINEERING
·
·
.'
·
. April 1, 1982
Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc.
P~ge 2
Vertically, the surveys will be established to third order accuracies, and will be refer-
enced to mean sea level.
The network of control obtained in the field will then be expanded by use of analytical
aerotriangulation techniques. This will be accomplished utilizing a V AX/VMS computer
sy.stem and a program obtained from the U. S. Geological Survey.
Map Compilation
Utilizing Kern PG-2 stereoplotters, we will then compile topographic maps at a scale
of 1 II = 200' with a 2' contour interVal. .
In areas of heavy vegetation growth, we will utilize the higher altitude black and white
photography taken for Tarrant Appraisal District to supplement the new coverage. Al-
though we could not plot with the same degree of accuracy, this photography was taken
when foliage conditions were optimum, and it would be possible to map areas which would
now be obscured.
As an economical measure, the maps will contain only limited planimetric detail. This
will include roads, railroads, and major drainage features. Other detail ~uch as buildings,
wooded areas, poles, fence lines, etc. would not be compiled, but would be visible on
photo sheets which would correspond in scale and area to each of the map sheets.
. I
I
i
Once compiled, the mapping will be final drafted (scribed), and copied into a 24" x 36"
sheet format. There will be a total of 37 sheets, the layout of which will be the same
as that for Tarrant Appraisal District. . Each sheet will be delivered in the form of a
reproducible stable-base my lar .
A mylar sheet index will also be prepared and delivered.
Map Accuracies
The accuracy of the mapping will be as follows:
Ninety percent of all well defined planimetric detail will be plotted
to within 1/40" at map scale, and no such feature will be in error by
more than 1/20".
Ninety percent of all solid-line contours will be accurate to within
one-half the con~our interva~ and no such contour will be in error by
more than one full interval.
...'
In areas of dense vegetation (heavy brush, trees, etc.) where visibility
of the ground is obscured, the contours will be shown as dashed lines
and plotted as accurately as photogrammetric methods permit.
Photo Sheets
As mentioned previously, we will prepare photo sheets to correspond to each of the map
sheets. These will be at a scale of 1" = 200', and will be printed in the form of reproduc-
ible screened film positives.
·
·
.'
·
,
. Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc.
Page 3
If permission is obtained from Tarrant Appraisal District, these sheets \vill be copies
of the orthophotos we are in the process of c~mpiling. If not, we will prepare scal~-
rectified enlargements to serve the same purpose.
Schedule
Vie anticipate all work being completed within 3 to 4 months after the date of photog-
raphy. The aerial photography will be obtained as soon as weather conditions permit.
Fees
Our fees for furnishing these services are as follows:
Aerial Photography .....................
Additional Costs for Color Photography ......
Field Control Surveys ...................
Analytical Aerotraingulation ..............
Map Compilation ......................
Additional Costs for Using February
Photography to Supplement Map-
ping in Areas of pense Vegetation ........
Final Dr af t ing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,. .... . . . . . . .
Photo Sheets ..........................
$ 1, 9 00 .·00 /
$ 500.00
$ 9 5 5 0 0 0 a()QIÄ. Vê r-..f.
, . /, /(..,
$ 2,520.00
$10,110.00
$ 500.00
$14,220.00
$ 1,000.00
Total.................. $40,300.00
AL TERNA TE PROPOSAL FOR 5' CONTOURS
The photography taken for Tarrant Appraisal District in February can be used to compile
mapping at the same scale (1 II = 200'), but with only a 5' contour interval. Our total fee.
for this approach would be $30,200.
If desired, we would be happy to discuss other scope changes to redu~e costs.
These fees may be considered firm for a period of 60 days.
Payment will be due within 30 days after the date of invoice. Invoices will be issued
monthly based upon percentage of work completed.
If you have any questions or if we can be of any additional assi~tance, please feel free
to contact us.
RH:mc
Very truly yours,
~c:Z;(Ø-
Randall L. Holt
.~
.
~ I'Ilterlla.t-ional AERIAL MAPPING COMPANY ~
~' .,.:...,IAM;,., 8927 International Drive · San Antonio, Texas 7 8216
~. PHONE (512) 826-8681 f\OUTING
~;' -~ JOB NO.
,". April tZ_t~~Gl982
Honorable Mayor and City Council of
North Richland ·Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hill~, Texas 76118
t~ L " LlG
,-
f .. OEM
........
--
.' '\ ~s~
"
f . .... ViAS
t::":~ DRW
--... -------
Re: 3-200, City of ',North Richland Hills
City~Wide Aerial Top~graphic Mapping
!-)'()~
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your letter dated March 24~ 1982, we are pleased
to fU,rnish the fo.l1owing proposal for photogrammetric mapping services
on referenced project.
I.
Aerial photography will be completed v/ith a~ focal length Wild
Rca precision aerial mapping camera. . This aerial photography will be
. flown with 60% forward overlap and 30% sidelap between adjacent strips.
The scale of the aerial photography will, be depenpent on the contour
interval selected. Aerial photograþhy will be flown at a scale of
111=500· fo.r the portrayal of ',two foot contours and 1"=10001 for the
portrayal of. five foot contours. The delivery items will consist of
one set of .911 x 9" contact prints and an index to the photography.
Necessary horizontal and vertical field control will be established
within the designated mapping area to provide basic requirements for
aerotriangulation to meet· National Map Accuracy Standards. 'Traverse
work for establishing the required horizontal control will' be completed
with one second optical reading theodolites and Hewlett-Packard distance
measuring equipment. Level lines for establishing required vertical
control ,will be accomplished with Zeiss Self-Leveling Levels arid Phil a- .
del phi a Rods. All traverses and level lines will be initiated at estab-
lished monumented stations within the,ar~a and will be closed to .similar
stations or completed as loops to provide for final adjustment of the
completed data.
"
...
Analytical aerotriangulation procedures will be initiated utilizing
glass diapositiv~s from the original aerial film'wherein these data .will
be PUGGED on our Wild PUG equipment to provide a ,minimum of six horizontal
and vertical points per stereo model. These PUGGED data ·will subsequently
be measured on our Mann Comparator interfa~ed with an AutoTrol Digitizer
and an IBM Cardpunch. These resulting measurements will be adjusted to
the established horizontal and vertical control by strip and block adjust-
ment utilizing our CATS analytical aerotriangulation reduction program.
.
.
Honorable Mayor and City Council of
North Richland.Hills
Page -2- ,
April ~~ 1982
/ t!. F A ¿:¡of!.. -:-
Following the completion of .the control adjustments t'opographic
map compilation will be implemented at a scale of ¡t'=2061 with two foot
or·five fopt contours on Wild B8S and Kelsh plotters./ All detail visible
in the photo image and compatible with final map scale will be compiled.
The resulting compilation manuscripts will be thoroughly' checked for
completeness and quality prior to the implementation of .final sheet
preparation. '
J;l 00 -/5"0
I.
Sheet fi.nalization will be accomplished by negative engraving tech-
niques wherein .all planimetric and topographic detail will be engraved
with symbols and lineweights compatible with final scale. A master mask
containing appropriate marginal data, to include a bar scale, contour
interval not~, date of photography; grid not~, declination diagram and
title block, ·will be prepared and composited with the completed scribe- .
coat for each sheet on matte surfaçe fi.lm. These composite film positives
will be finalized with mechanical lettering devices to provide 'appropriate
names data for streets, drainage.fe.atures 'and other"appropriate detail,
to include grid value~, spot elevations and contour valués. .
Final sheet size will be 24" x ·3611 in overall ·size with a 20". x 30"
(4000' X 60001) neat image area. ,All map sheets .will be assigned an
-appropriate identifiçation number and an Index to ~heets .will be prepared
on 2411 x 36" material and fu.rnished fo.r refe.rence and. relative location
of the individual fi~al sheets. Matching sheet·numbers .wi.ll be draft~d on
appropriate sides of the topographic sheets fO,r use as refe.rence. A total
of 32 topographic sheets will b~ required to cover the estimated 12)000
acres comprising the mapping area. .
.'
.All work in this project will be accomplished in accordance. with the
highest professional standards fo.r assurance that all .finalîzed data meet
National Map A~curacy Standards in all, respects. . In'this connection our
Quality Control Program.is based on a progressive review of data through
each technical work phase combined ,with an additional technical review of .
.all .finalized data to ensure the maintenance of quality and accuracy
standards throughout the various' work requirements of each p~ject.
Delivery items for the topographic mapping area.will be_one somplete
set of ,topographic map.s, scale'1"=20'O~') :with two fO,at or.fi,ve foot contours
and an Index to Sheets.
Photo atl as sheets may be prepared at a seal e' of ,1"=200.1. to correspond
to the proposed topographic maps. "These sheets will be prepared using the
compilation manuscripts as a control base.'.'The aerial photographic ex-
posures will be rectifi~d and an aerial'mosaic'laid'to this control base.
.
.
Honorable Mayor and City Council of
North Richland Hills
Page '~3~
April ~, 1982
Following the completion of the mosaic process the individual sheets
will be copied and subsequently printed on a reproducible film positive.
A suitable mask or border plate will be prepared and used when com-
positing the.film positives. The delivery items will be one set of
thirty-two' '(32) 111:'200· photo atlas sheets.
Our fees for the services herein described are as subsequently
listed.
'.
A. 111=200' topographic map sheets with two foot
~ontours
B. 1"=200C-topographic map sheets (only roads will
b~ ~hown' )'wi th two foot__çontours
c. 111=200' topographic map sheets with five foot
..ÇO n t n.u.r.s.
D. 111=200'. topographic map sheets' (Qnly roads wi)}'
be shown) wi th--fue_H.footcontours.___.________._
E. 1:=2.00-'-- photo atl as sheets
All fees quoted are valid for a period of 90 days.
...
$5~,960.00
$4~,150.00
$2.7)825.00
. $25,535.00
$ ·3, i 50 . 00-
All services proposed herein w~ll be completed .wit~J~_JO dalLfg.llowing
ournotice_tCL.p1D~ee.d. --
~
Requests for additional infonnation will receive prompt attention..
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look
forward to being of service to you and the City of North Richland Hills.
Sincerely,
.'
INTERNATIONAL AERIAL MAPP~NG CO.
KM-~
Robert Gonzales
Technical Representative
~
RG:ml
.
.
.
.'
.
DATE:
4-8-82
SUBJECT:
Signalization of Davis Blvd~ & Main St.
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: Approval f~E-2ignalization of this intersection has been a~proved bv
the State. I had originally intended to request funding for this project in next
year's budget, but that would delay c.onstruction until sometime during the
school term.
If approved now, construction could be completed before Sep'tember.
The estimated construction costs for this pro;ect is $35,000 and I woV1d anrir;p~rp
the engineering cost to be $3,500 for a grand total of $38,500. I 'reco~mend
that we employ Pinnell, Anderson~ Wilshire and Associates of Dal¡aß 'to eng;~p~r
this project.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQlTIRED: Approval to authorize Pinpell. Andpr~on;) Wi 1 shire
and Associates to p~oceed with plans and specifications and to ~ppropr;ate tn~
necessary funds from General Fund Surplus.
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO X
General
--~-~~-~~-~~----~~~~-~--~~
-'fØ"
.
..
.
"
.
..
City of JXðrth RichJand Hills, Texas
.: ;\
¡¡ "
~"""\,<t
\."t¡r/!
-:::::::~-,-::_-Þ" C~_?;;-
~~\
/ ""-
¡ I
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Cecil Forester~ Director Public Works/
Utilities
REF: PWM-0025-82
DATE: March 24, 1982
SUBJECT: Signalization of Davis & Main
Several months ago I requested the State to survey this
intersection to determine if signalization was warranted.
The State has notified me that the study is complete and the
intersection does warrant signalization. In terms of pedestrian
traffic~ automobile traffic and interruption of traffic~ this
signalization is needed for safety and for public convenience.
I respectfully request Council's approval to proceed immediately
with plans and sPecifications in order that we can complete the
project before the school term begins in September.
This is a relatively simple intersection to signalize with the
exception of a railroad pre-emptor. I feel the pre-emptor
is essential because of the proximity of the railroad on Davis
and Main as well. My estimate of the total project including
engineering is $~8,500.
I recommend that we employ P.A.W.A. to engineer this project should
it be approved. They are traffic engineering specialists and have
worked for us on other projects.
Funds for this project could be appropriated from General Fund
Surplus.
(817) 281-0041 I 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 ¡ P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76118
.
.
~
.
DATE:
4-6-82
SUBJECT:
Change Order #2 - Rufe Snow, nr;V~t Ph~~p T
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
BACKGROUND: During the platting process for the Tapp AdditJon, we required the
developer to provide a deceleration lane for south bound traffic on Rufe Snow
leading into the main entrance of the mall.
In addition~ we felt that sig~alization of .the intersection at Lewis Drtve~ the
mall entrance~ and Rufe Snow would be required and the TappAdditton agreed, in
a covenant, to pay ~ the cost.
We request your approval to expand the Rufe Snow project by 17,413.27 to cover
·the cost of ~ portion of these modifications. The Ci~ will recover $16,902.04
from the developer prior to final inspection approval.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQUIRED: Approval of change order #2 in the amount of $17,413.27
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
General erp
NO X
~~-~~~----~--~~~~-~~~~-~~
.
.
..
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
Apri 1 2 ~ 1982
Mr. Cecil Forester,
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-315, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RUFE SNOW DRIVE, PHASE I, CHANGE ORDER NO.2
We are enclosing Change Order No.2 for the referenced project which
has been executed by the Contractor and which we are recommending to
you for approval. Thi s Change Order prilllaril y covers increased quanti ti es
resulting from modifications required to serve the Tapp Addition near
Lewis Drive. Also included are new items for future signalization at
Lewis Drive and Industrial Park Blvd. The total amount of this Change
Order is $17~413.27.
As noted in our letter dated February 24, 1982, Re: 3-960, Tapp Addition,
Paving and Drainage Assessment, a total of $16,902.04 should be recovered
from the Developers of the Tapp Addition for the extra construction costs
required to serve thjs development.
Please call if you have any questions.
RWA/ljc
Enelosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
'r -.
. }
.~7'rr'~f>?='. c-> * .þ. ..þ. ~ ...... ~ ..... ...... ~ \0 ......., en w N ...... 'Z~
0 ......., en 01 ..þ W N ...... 0 . . C>-I
:z :z . · fT1
(J") fT1 . :3:
........O-f-i-fO(l')-i ~
::JCD(t)ØJÞlQlct> :;0
0.. ~ n ""0 -0 -0 (""t- ~ c:: -0 W -0 ~ -I ~ ~ -i -0 en ..þ. 0'\ r- r- V> o.
c:: ...... (t) -C "0 -C' 0 n ::Þ c:: ~ ØJ , ...... ..... . c-t- rra
(I) C/) ~ Cc-t-t -< .~ -C -0 -C -c n ...a. 3 a -os C/)
r+ CD »::Þ)::a-S ~ -0 . ~ (t) (þ (1) ro '" 3 -t n n CD CD en n
-so-sa.o..c.. 0 ...... <: CÞ ::r ---' C CD ;0
.....,Øla.a.c..(/)(t)z -f ,(I co = = = ( -S t/') c-t- 1--4
ØI -'. rt- ..... ...... ..... CD t/) fT1 0 C C 0 » 0 ('"") c:r c-t'" -0
---'<.....rtc-t'rtnc-t-r 3: ('"") X ØJ 0 n = Øt rr1 -I
CD 0 ..................rt 0 V') 0 (þ rt ØI 0 OJ Qo e- x ........
-0 ::so 00""" (I ::3 (I) ..... 3: :I: ::I: c-t ::J n 0
¡:Un :3::S::Soc):> c.. ~ --'. ~ 3: n ...... ØI :z
-so. ~-S-i c: (I) :x> » 3: co (.I) <
"::3þJ=Z:(T1C/) ~ ....... .... . I n (""'") n (þ = C ØI 0
. a..::s 0 :::s 0 fT1 0 (""t- o I I <:: c.. c:r c-+ -r¡
CJCCD-SrtCXr-:z CD N N 01 G') c.c ......
-' ..... c+ -s c-t' c-1" s:u V') c-+ = = ~ s::: -s 0 -0
<rt =r s:u ::r C'D ::s .. 0 ~ ("") M- ØJ ::s »
a.. en ~ ::SCÞ ~ ~ c: CD 0 M- e.. -<
mom(/) * * -s ~ :::s CD CD
-+a ::s (1) ::s -'.;::0 ......., '-" n , ......
no rt rtoro -i
0, -SØJ-s::s< ~
::3 ØI c-t- Q.I (t)
a.." ::s :3 Ï1 -s
cs:::: nr-O-Stn
--'. c-t C1)CÞCÞOC1)
. ('1- c:: ~ 3 n
en, ..... . n :I:
CD VI CD C ;t:.
-., CD-S Z
o· (/') t:J c.o< G')
-S ...... -s -'.(1) rr1
to .... . ::s
.,,:::S < :3-1 0
CØJ CD ......, ;0
rt- ---' :::ss:u r- rr1 t/) -; l/) t/) V) V) (.I') (I) r- -I V') (""'") I~ 0
c: ..... lO::s :Þ . 0 . . . 0 . . rtl
-SN (I) ..." n -< :z -< -< -< -< " ." ." :z -< -< ~
(þQl (.I) . :I:
C"T r+ 2
(.I) ...I. ø." 0
-'·0 . -s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ':Þ .
.:3 '-Jª N CD CD W W ......
0'1 ~ ...... 0 ~ 0 ...... N
+ c.n N N N 01 N CO \f .»
C) (.I) ~ ~ "-'" ......., ~ '-" '-" c::
...I. o rt ~V)
N· QI C:-I;:o
~ cT·· 01 t.n t11 'aJ ~......c:
n- o ......., ......., ......... w zz.,
..... . ......., CD ()) "" CO N -i f'T1
0 tn+ ~;c
:::s M- 0 -i 0 t/')
ø.o ...... 0"\ ~ .....,. In -<:ÞZ
. ~ 0 0 ...... 0 .þ 00
5! "" co -Þ- ..þ. N (X) 01 ;0 ::e:
01 . ~ rra (
+ ..,.... <00
00 t-t3:;o
o c. N co co ~ ~ f-I .þ ~ lo~ (.I) -0 ......
to 0 ...... ...... 0 CJ1 .þ. U1 0 t11 ....... :x> -<
:::r w w w m N w ....... en ~ co OZm
(/) :z z -<y
-i (,1),-
c-t- ...... m ~ ....... ~
~ fo--& 0 C) t--' -
......... co ~
\0
+
0
0
. r+
0
(.I)
~
ØJ
c.n
+
(J
,
.
.
.
.'
.
DATE: 4-5-82
SUBJECT:
Partial Pay Estimate #5 - Rufe Snow Road Improvements Project
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: Austin Road CC?:..jDeqyesting payment for work completed through
3-31-82.
Total Contract Price
Work Performed To-date
Less 5% Rètainage
Difference
. Less . Pr(~vi ous Payments
Difference Due This Estimate
$808,193.14
$312,316.24
$ 1 5', 61 5 .81
$296,700.41
$260,900.68
$ 35,799.75
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQIJIRED:
Approval of pay esti~ate in tbe amount nf $35,799 75
BUDGETED ITEM:
Accom~T NUMBER:
YES X NO
General CIP
.
.
.'
e
KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
Apr11 1, 1982
Honarable ~'1ayor and City Council
C1t)' of North R1chland Hills
7301 ~.£. LOQP 320
~orth Richland Hills, Texas 76J12
Re: 3--::'115, C ITV OF NORTH 1~I. CH,~~ltH) HI LbS ,
f1. tJ ~~. ""'"'!. ¡~) 1 V';- p~' ~ S· :=--rf
:::¡ r ~_ ::'f.t~J~.. lJ'", 1.:., n}.. t ~
ÇVOJ~iT~ACrO~· 3 P,;RTlt\t.. p¡\.y EST!r~l"l"t :r)~ !)
Enclose\! is one copy of Contractor's Pðv-tial Pie.Y Estlt1ate Nn. 5. dated
Apt-il 1, 19ß'2, r~~ade pa.yahl~ t.o Austì¡1 Road Cor.lpat~y -in the a':9t)Unt of
$35,799.75, for l!~aterials furnished and ~JOrk p~rforrned on th~ refert?f'tct~d
project as of ~arc~ 3It 19B2.
The quantities and condition err the ~roi{~ct h¿,ve been verif'ted on-site
b.y· YOtJr representative, Flo)/d ~·1cCallun. as indicatn-d b:1 S is}nat.urø 00 the
~5t'-¡H~dt,:.~. and '-¡~~~ h,¡~V2 f.:he~k~~d the it~~H €xtÐnsi-ct~ti and addit.ions.
t!'JereCQ(fI~~~t~nd that this p~~~;t¿ot in 380t:n't of $35)799. 75. b~ H!ade to
f~us tin ;:~Qad Co. at r. f). B·ox 2 ,:es, Fort ¡~;orth ~ T~~xa5 75113.
l\10:19 \11th ð CODY cf this letter. the Contraetor is b~1n9 furnish~ a
b 1 ,;111 ~ es t i~~.;; t~ -rQ t'ri far prep~ ri,,º O::X t r:H)nth I $ (~5 t ip~a tt~.
~RO
to
t"
H!Jl~ : bv g
cc: :·~r. R3d9~r i~'. Line J C 1 ty ;'-7al·H'\j~f'
I'1r. Dwight S~nith) Austin R~1ad
>~:r ~ Cae 11 For~~s tér» Oi r~ctof:· ~f P~Jbl i c ~!()rks
~ t,r" F1D,yd ;!CCd 11 ti.[.l t C1 ty I nsp~ct(\r
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211- METRO/2ö7-3367
-...- -"-~--.--..._-_.>"."--_._-'- ----
~._---_.-.---_.- ~-_.._-----._-- --- ...---.----.-.-. ... ~~. ._._--_.._---_.~- ..__....._-_._~_._--~._.. ---.....--..- .__..._-~...
CON T RAe TOR'S
EST I \1 ATE
P 1 OF 3
FILE F3315
- - - - - - - - ~ ~
- - - - - - - -
-_._....._... ...---.-.--.- _. . - _._ __. .....'OÞ._.... . _._ ____..____.__..__ ",..__"._,._". ..1______
:STI~ATE NO.- 5 ~08 NO.- 3-315
~:._~t~~ ~_~~_~7~~_~_~~ D~_~itL ~~AI~~_._I ~í~_~~~~~~E~~~.~R~~~~ J~~.h!'~~~ ~~L~~! I ~~u ;~T ~~ B ~ ~D 1 / 8 2
I~E CHARGED THRU PERIOD- 171 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD CO~PANY
OR \'ATERIALS FUR!'!ISHED A~1D LABOR PERFORr/ED IN PERIOD ENDlf\lG- 3/31/82
:9 R.!Sq..Q.8_º_ER___º_A I.~_:-__J.-º_()..~ l.& ¡_.__ _ _ .__.____ .ç.i~J~·_.t;..~~PoA8...__ DAY $:-. .3 15 '. c.or!J~ ~_~ IJ. ON ..P.A I_~.~___._._8_ (..22 /82
PREVIOUS THIS UNIT
. 0 . ._..I _I~['v~._-º-~.~_5;.fi.t2..I.LQi'!..._______._____~,_~.I. T__., ..~ ~ T .I ~~ A_T.E. __, E ~.T. I t~!ð.r._ç:______._ .T. Q .T-Ak-_._.... _______..P.R. 1_ C E_______ ...A IV_O u t\! T
--~---~---~~-----~----~--~--~~---~~- ---~---- -------- ~-~-~-~- ---~--~- ---~----~
1. U.~JC L . ... ;).TJ~~,E E_L. _~~.ç_t'\ VAT.I QN.__ _ C ~ Y ._ . 500 ..9.0 183 9.4.d6 0 18894.6.0. . 1 .53 2 S 9 0 8 .74
2. Su9GRADE STAR. ~/LI~E SLURRY S.Y.1120J.OOO 2619.00013819.000 O.8~ 11055.2Q
3. LI~E FOR STAB. SUBGRADE Tor~ 133.00 110.00 243.00 77.0u IB711.JO
~.~--.:~8~LC_V T ~_ _.f-º ~ _8.E~\10Y_ð_\- .. Odf__.. ___..... ____....__ '___._.._.________.________.._.___.___... __._.__ _________________________...__ ._,..______
EXIST. CONCa & ASPH. L.F. 0.00 0.00 C.OO 0.70 0.00'
S. RE~OVE EXIST. CUqS & GUTTER L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 0.00
6. CO~·JST_R~C T_ _ 6_~!_..Ç;)_R.B.__& 1 ß.!. ..!......____._._. .. ___
GUTTER. INC. REINF. STL L.F. 0.00
7. 4tlTHK (L.B 2000 PSI CONCa
_____f.º~~.._i~_~.D.l:~i\l~__§____~i l ~_C ...__U.SE S S. _F___.._.____._._.___.9_~..º...Q.__.. __,...__.Q.oJ 0.9._...
8. 5 t. THK (0:\1C. DR',vYS S.F. 0.00 a.oa
9.6" THK CONC. VALLEYS S.F. 0.00 0.00
\1 C.~.3 0.. .QB_.__E..A-:,!j._~.(:~ ~__~3-!. ti.~__ç º~. T._.______... __ ___ .___.
INCL. SANDING S.V.11200.00J·
·1. RC-2 C~ EA-HVRS ASPH. TACK
. ....- .. _..C.O.A T_ .._____~._____ _..__......__.____ .______ _,._ ___~ ._Y.,_~_..____ __..__.9.!_Q 9___ . _0 ..._~ 0
2. .A H~ACt 2" THICK
CO~PACTED IN 1 COURSE S.V. 0.00 0.00 ü.ao 2.60
.3.. .._ï_.Y_. 0 H ~l.A.Ç. t.(Q ~·JP_~_ç_J ~ D _,_2. -'_.'.._TH ~..~_. ._ ~.. ~._~.______.__º__._,Q 0..." . _.,_ Q o..Q.Q.._.__ _. __.º_.- .D_9__._u_..__...._.2 . 7. ~._.. _ '''_'' º ._9.Q,
4. TY.D HVAC FOR TRANS. & ~ISC TO~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 O.CO
5. T Y . D H \1 A, (t 1 1 / 2 tiT HIe K FOR
_.__.._____....__D._E_I_Q1L~.__Ç_O.I'lST R~_C_T._IO!\l_._._______~_~ y ~_1_l,.2.Q_º_~ ,Q__Q.O__ ___ ___..Q.. Q_Q._G 112 0 Q.~.Ç_9 c________Z_~.,:3._~_. _ __.,2 6..2 Q.ß _..G 9_
ó. ADJ. WATER VALVE BOXES TO
FIN. STREET GRAD~ EACH 0.00 0.00 o.oe 125.00 c.ca
1._..._._T,YE E__J._l ~.ê_~!~__,_R E.E,L.E.ç:.I_Q R_IZ..ED _____..__ "_ __. ______________________ ,..__." _ ..__.__. __ _____ _. ______...___. .____.._.._________. _.___..__ .
TRAFFIC ~ARKERS EACH 0.00 0.00 0.80 2.90 C.OO
8. TYPE 1-( REFLECTORIZED
- "h ----,___J..RI~EE_l_C_~,.~KEB..s____._____.____.__,..._ EA.CH______Q _~._OQ..____u___...O_.. .0_0
·9. YELLO~ TRAFFIC BUTTONS
(NQN-REFLECTORIZED) EACH 0.00 8.00 a.GO 1.58 0.00
o. _.'.t!tLL.I_E --t.RA~EE-LCB_U_LT_O~l SH..' .____._______. .. q u..__ _._. __._____. _ ____ _. ___ ___________________._.____ ____._________ ______ _ _____________
(NO~-REFLECTO~IZED) EACH 0.00 o.oe 0.00 1.56 c.oo
1. lA' 'DIA. (L. III RCD L.F. 1097.00 0.00 1097.00 16.0J 17552.00
,
2 . .' _ 2 1_"... D. tA · ___C l .__ _.I.J._ t__e,-c e._____..~ __.... L.. ,E .~__ ___...2,_9_1_~ .º_Qu._..__ ..___.,_O_~..Ü;J ______.2 9.1.- ,.Q.Q..___..17 . 0 0 49 4 7 . 8 0
3. 24' 'OlA. CL. I I I RCP L.F. 349.00 0.00 349.00 ··18-~-60----··'6-4-9-ï~40-
4. 27' 'DIA. CL. II I RCP L.F. 162.00 -58.au 112.00 2tJ.5ù 229ó.OO
5. _ 33 r.. DJÄ..____CL .,_.__1_..1..1 .J~._CP___._.._._ . L e,é. _ ._,._.4._88.~_ 99__ 0 ~ C_9..___._.l;...88_..0__Q 25 .CO.___,122qJ_~_~_9_
6.36' 'DrA. CL. III RCP L.F. 1208.00 J.GJ 1208.00 30.40 36723.20
_7. £¡.8"DIA. CL. III ~CP L.F. 825.00 0.00 825.00 43.9C 36217.50
_d. 54' '.DIA... CL·._...I II..-.-:3CP_._ "__'__"'___'_ L..F~_.. lO_92~.OO ,J.O.Pd._ 1092.0__9. . .63.2:J, 74474.~O
9 _a' S T D. C lJ R ~.- I;~ LET E A C H 0 . 00 C . û J 0 . 0 C 1 0 :, (} . 0 ü ' ··"c ~ 0 0·'
c~, sra. CU~3 I~LET EACH o.CO 0.00 8.00 141J.OO c.oa
1. 15' STD. ClJR3 _I;\~LET EACH a.co. .o..aû 0.00 21CG.OG 0.00
2. 20' 5 T Q. . CUR SIN LET E A C H 8 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 (; . C02 6 G C . COO ~' Ü Û
--.-.----...--.-.-.- ._------ ~'-
O.OJ
a.co
~ -~-
4.23
"
o.oo~
0.00
1.. _.91
2.93
3.05
0.00
.. ..- --."-.,-,,,.-.,,-
Q.OO
0.00
0.00
0.00
. ..... ..____.____..... ._. or
- -.... ---- _.- -.
O.0QOl120C.CCO
0.28
3136.00
O.ÛQ
O.C5
c.ca
.. ..- ...... -.--..-. .-.-. ...~-.... -
a.co
,~' · ~~_Q ____ ._..... __ 2._!. 7_ 8 __ --___.____9_~º.-º_
- _._1.____......___ _ _.__._ __ ...___..... ___._...____~_.. ...._...._...
____. u...________..._..___ _ . "_._._._...._. ___
- .... . . .- .... ..~ -- ..
.:
___._.______._.._._________-..........____.____..4. __...__ _._.__.... .______...____~...._____.______.______.__..~ _____... .. ._... ._..-__.__......_.._-~._
CON T RAe TOR'S
EST I ~\¡ ATE
P 2 OF 3
FILE F3315
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
.~-...' - ---.--..---- --.- + ..----- -----....--.--------.....- -.--------...... .'.--"-- ..-.------.----------..-.. -.. -..- ..- -. ..-......-- --.... -.........-.--.. .-.-- . ...- --.-...--.-----....---..-.. ...". .-_. - .... ... -
. --., -...-.. --.--
S~TE ~.~o.- 5 ..JOB ~~o.- 3-315
R~T DESC~IPTIO~- ST.& DRAIN.IMPROV.CN RUFE SNOW DR. IH820 TO INDUS. PK BLVD
,' '! :l::.~~~~~~! OR T H-.__RLCHLb~!)__.H I LLS_____.__.___._..u._....P LA CE~-1':O R 1.1-;. -~ 1 CH L.l\~~D .H 1. L LS_, __or X___ D.AT E - .__ _4_./_... 11..8 Z
I~E CHARGE~ THRU PERIOD- 171 DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROA~ COMPANY
OR ~ATERIAlS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFOR~ED IN PERIO~ ENDING- 3/31/82
'ORK -0 R D ER_. DA T E ~-_LQ_I_12_/_8_L--_____.____cALEr~ DAR _ DA '(5-. 3 15 _-. -.CO~if?l,E T_ I .ON__.._DAT E~______ ,8/22/8 2__
PREVIOUS THIS UNIT
: o. -_____LT£!:__D.ES.C£U.f?.X_I O~______._______._UN I I--.ES T Iiv~A TEES T. ¡ ~!~A T E. --.---T-O.T ALu______E.RI C E . . _ _.A¡~·:OU t··¡.T__ __'.
---~-----~~~~---~~---~-~~~~-----~~~- ---~-~~- -~------ ---~---- --~~---~ -~~~~--~~
3. lot STAG E I - 'HALF) I i\~ LET, I [\!C L .
T I ~~ 8 E ~ CO V E R
4 . 2 C t S TAG E I (H A L F ) I ~ 1 LET , I r\~ C L .
.-.. -- - -TI ~1B E-i~..--.CQ v. ER--- -----.----------.EACH ,--..----.----.5,. O.G
5. STORM D~AIN VAULT AT
ST.A. 11+71
6. S TO~~:... .DRA I.~.._.VAUL T A.I..
STA. 15+71
7. STORv DRAI~ VAULT AT
.. - _____5.J A..___.2 3 +.5__0______ _.____-,-_______.___ L.. S . ___u_ ,_________1 ..00
8. STOR~ DRAIN VAULT AT
STA. 26+32 l.S. 1.00
9,. .5 T.OR.~·t.._DJ~l~ I_!~l_.\'l\ULT.__f\_I .__.___ __.. ___.____., ___ _. ____ _ _,__..
STA. 35+73 L.S. 1.00
. ::.~:~~ T~~_;.~ ~.t ~~~~_~!_~¡ L)______..L..S... _____ .._l~O_O.. .._
S T A. 37+80 (t, A ' t ) L. 5 . 1. 00
. 2 .._.c_O[~;_C.._._Ef~JCASE_\::1~t·!.T_, F'JR_'tlATER..._
LINES9 INCL. REINF. STL (.y.
3. F LEX I 9 L E BAS E, C R U SHE D S TO ,\! E
-- - --- .._.FO R.. F:A_V E['~ Ef\Lr_.~ E? l~.C,EË EN T . ..C . .Y.. ..____..._ .____-º_.__O_O______,. ..._....Q.6I.0 Q.._.___.____.__.,. 0_ . ,0 Oq ..., _.___._1__9_~_9_~__._. ,_..______0..._ R.Q..
'4. r9AFFIC RESIG. AT RUFE SNO~
DR. & IH820 N. SERVe RD L.S. c.oa ~.OO 0.00 2550.00 0.00
5_~ ..ç_~ Q.~___~Q_.__1._~._2_7_~~3___ .ç (3~"L.._e~8____~_~f_~.______Q._º._!_QQ.._____._ _______0.- ~_J.. ._._._. 6 G. . Q_.9_______..7_.1.!_9 ~ _.. ._ 4315 . a 0 ~
.. - -- .- ---- --.. ._-.
,
EACH
c;.~ù
a.QO
9.80
aG':.) .00
72üO.CJ
-- - O. 08. -____ _ .5 . 00_......1500 .0 G...... -,_-75 (; û . _J C.
L.S.
1.CO
r'\ r'\t"\
v."v
1.00
1720.08
1720.CJC
~ --...~--"'''_..' "'-.-"-- ..
l.S.
1.00
0.00
1.00
1720.08
172J.Jù:
'" ""~
""evoJ
_ .. 1 e C C _. .__172o_...0 .Q_.. .,____ __17_2 Q ._ a 0...:
J.j~
1.00
172û.GO
1720.00
*.._.. ~ _..._.__..._.. 4.
~.c)G
1.80
172C.C~
172C.CJ·
0.00
I. . q 0.... ___ 3 2 a G . C _ J . . _
328Q.OQ
o. G:)
1.ûO
2500.00
250C' .co
-- -.--..... .__._._------- -.---.- --..- ..-. ...
~ .--_.._---_.
a.QO
a.oo
G.Oû
78.00
a. ·~o
# _. -. -_._-~-~_.._- ---'-.-------.-.---.------------.----------...-----
-. --..-.--- -+-.---.--..
.--------.-...--------------.---
-------------- .---.-.-.------------.- ----.-.- - -.----------.-..-.-*---. ..-----.-.-...-- .... - ----.-- ....---..--....- --
-.- --- -. - ..-- . -... -_.- .... - -~ . .. ----_._--. .---- -- - .. -
...--.______ 4. __ ___...._ ___
.~ .-..----...------.---.--..------- ---------..---.-------.., .-..-..-.-
-----. --..-.-.------- -- .-- --.---- -....-.,
-.. -- -----.------------------------ --_,
._.__. ---.---.- ---.-.--. .----.-.-------.------.-..-.-.---- .-....-..----.-.---~. .... ..__.._._ ..~__._ 4._.____~_.____
-- ._. _. --"--'" ._.-
-- 'p - ._. -_...... _.._~_..,-,._.....__.
- . -- .. _. -.. --'" --.---...-, -- .--- ... . '--'.'
. -..
- -_.- ...-.. ._-_.- _...... .....-----. ....~.__._. _.-..._.-_._-"~--.__....__._-- .............
- --. .. - _.. - ... - - . - - _. --
__.._·__4.____.__ .___...___ .___.._ ._'0_ ____-4. __4._.____._ ...
----...-.- -
. _ . --. . _ _ _. .... . _ 4.. _ ... . 0 _ __ #. .. _ 0_ _ _
- _0" ______..__.~_._.._.
-. ...... - ----. _..
--.- . --~..- __._.___._,____._.4.. .____._._. __..._._ ...__.
~__ .___ _4' .. _ ...
; f
_. ...---... .__.,----- --.,.- ----
-----------....-._---_..__..._---_...--~---_.._... . ,<. ..~~ .-------.----. -'------~._---... --_._------ _._~ -~--
CON T R A CT 0 R I 5 EST I ~ AT E
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P 3 OF 3
FILE F3315
----.-..........-... -----
-- '-.-----..--------...----------- -.
---. ..-..... - .
0'" _ ._ _ __.. ._.._.....
.-'. --- "-"---"'-'---'-
'-". ..-. -._' -- .-.- ..... -'"
S.·'ATE :\0.- 5 Joe ~~o.- 3-315
R CT DESCRIPTION- ST.& DRAIN.I~PROV.O'~ RUFE SNOW DR. IH820 TO INDUS. PK BLVD
~NER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TX DATE- 4/ 1/82
I ~.~ E' -CHA R G ED--"-HRU-P-E-R I 00-=----171'- DA Y S' .,- -·'c 0:\ T R AC i~'ÓR:':"'- AU-S T -¡UN" -'RO'A D èOt'Í pÄi"~ Y -. ..--
OR MATERIALS FUR~IISH~D AND LABOR PERFOq~ED I~ PERIOD ENDI~G- 3/31/82
.\/O~ ~.__º~~P_~L~_ P.A_T ~_-:__!_º(_~,? (~. -L___.__. C~J-:.s!~º,~.R. o..P_~_Y.$o~_. . 31? ....... .__ .., ._,C.O~~.~o~ ~ IJ_9,f~____º!: T _~.:. 8/22 /82
~..- -- -.---.
PREVIOUS THIS UNIT
I TEJ~~__.J~~~~~ ~.~-T.I.ºI'!_____________.__.~ill__.;.~ T..! ~~.A.T_~o_._;S r.I ¡'~~ A T_~._o .__.._T QTAJ~.___....,_p R ICE
A \~OUI\l T
,10.
-~--~----~-~---~~~-~~~-~~~-~~--~~~~~- ~--~~--~ -----~-- -------- ---~~~-- --~--~~--
.' .. ~_. ."- _.. --. ----.-. -... ---- --- --------... ~-
:- I E L D \/ E R I F I CAT ION 0 F ~ 0 B C 0 ~~ D I T ION S
\ :'1 J C 0 f\~ FIR \:, A T I () N 0 F PAY QUA \! TIT I E S
... - - .- ... - .. - - - ~-. . . . --.-. -- _. _... - - .'- .-..- - . .
-3 - - .-. - ----- . - 'G- - -..- --- ----..- --- -.. ___m__ ---".- .-- --- -- --. --- - .-.-. -- - .------- -- --- - --" .-- - - - ---. -- -
y------~-t?~~(t____l~~--------
( º .\.~Ü~ E R _~ ,.$ '0' P-!~._Q.J .~ C. J . ~ .E P I~ f:. ~ ~r'~ T fo· T I .V.E . '- ...
ATE- .19
...._.. '.._..-__. - -_0. ____
--~-~~-----~~~-~-~~~-~~
... -_._----~..._._- ....._..._-..._------.._~--_.._._---------_. ---'~'
.-. -.. ....---.----..- .-. ._----~--_.__._.--......._._--.-._.- ~ ----_..~_..--...-
-.... .......---- ------.-----. -- _.. -.- --.. ~--"....' --- -......-
~--~~~~---~---~~-~---~~~-~---~--~----~~-~----~-~~~~~~~-~--~~-~-~._-~---~-~~-~~-----
?p~oQ_VED-._.o..__._..__. _.____,_.._. q'----.---..,____o...._o.. '. ..0_.'_____.0_. TOTA~_o.. . ...~_..~..__!...,~__._~.._ .._..~__.._tþ__.,~__. .
I\OvlLTON-E\~GLISH-FLO',·;ERS, INC. LESS 5, PERCE>~T RETAINED. . _e .
.5 I T (\1 G E N G I ~~ E E R 5 D IFF ERE NeE . . . . . . . . . . .
,y_- - ..' ·_n__ .--:.. . -~---._n--"-~3~~L7~~P.~R:E~l~'\~~I:S. O~~Ai::C: .
- -----~-------------------......-- LESS PREVIOUS PAY¡"íEl\JTS . . . . .
J\ TE ":..-.-- -. _ '__./_ -.._____..-'1.9 ¡ 1--=:.-.-. DI.F fE RE NC E _DUE'.,1: ti 1.S E S.IJ t~1_t\.T ~.,. .
------- -~------------ ---- NOTE-PAY LAST A~OUNT SHOWN
312316.24
15615.81
296700.43
:" '" '"'
'v. v,-t
, --
296700.43
260900.68
35799.75
aJ.~ L_..EAR~(LNG.S.i1.!iC.L._~ -_REJ:AJJ~t. J_:,:S _~_12~.1.Q..2~_.__.JPJA L_.B 1_ D::$..8 OBJ9_3_._¡~____'pE R CE ,'H-·3 8 .64
I"·~E CHARGED THRU THIS PERIOD- 171 DAYS TOTAL TI,\1E- 315 DAYS PERC-~f\'T-'----54.2ã·
- ~. - - --- _. -,··---·,·-._....·_~______4__~________..._______...___. _._. _._..___________._________...__...._____
_. --- - --- -_.. -.--.-- ...---..--------...--.-.--...-.. .-.-.....
_. ... --- ._. ... --.- ^ .-. .. -.
---.-.------- -". ...------------- -------.----.---
---------.---------..--.--
. ._-~--- .' .....-..--.-----.--------------.-...... -....-..-. .....------.--
..----...--..- -...--..... _.. -- ---..._----- .----~--..-.-
.---. ---..----. ---_..._._.~.._-...------- '-" .... -- -...--- ...-.......--
.#
-- .......-.-..--. ...-. -_.
- ."'" --_...._---~-----------_._------_..._-..- .. _.~---_., ------ - . ..-...-.. ..--... .-..~ -.---.... --.-.-..
u_ ...__._....._._._..___..._... __...._ _.__ ____ _ _. ._ .._ _....____.___._._.._ ..._. .____
.......-._----~-_.__. -.-.---....--.-..-.-. .....- .-.--. ..------- -.- -.....
. ----._-- -- .....~. .~--_.------ ._. ....-......_....... 9'"
. -- .. _... .-.....-....
. --._ .h_
. .----.--.-- --.....--.--------.
_.. -------.-...--..
-- ..... ...-.. .. .. -..-.-... -.---------.. -_...-
. - .- .. ...-.
-- --.- ..-........--- .-.---- - ---------_. -....-..--....----...----.-..-.--.....
- .. ....-.- -....~....._._-._._----._-.
-.,-....-.--.--.-.. .-.... .--.----..--.---..--..---....-- _._. -- .~... .-.__.. __... 4 _"'_'__' .....~_._._ __.__ ,.
. . ----~..-_._- ----....--..- .. .- -.
.. -.- - -." -_..~-....._........_-.-..-
_... -. -.-.- .....~ .---... _... ~
·
·
.'
·
DATE: . 4-6-82
~
SUBJECT:
Partial Pay Estimate #1 - Glenview Dr. Utilitv Adjustment
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: C. R. Feazell is requestinq payment for wQrk compJeteçt throqgh 1-':\1-H?,
Total Contract Price
Work Completed to-date
Less 10% RetainaQe
Difference
Plus 75% of Material on Hand
Total
Less Previous Payments
Due This Estimate
$72..479.05
$ 9..903.00
$ '990.30
$ 8,912.70
. $ 8.. 899 . 29
$17..811.99
-0-
$17..811.99
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Apprpyò J of Pay ~stiU1i'1tp jn thp ðn:tOlmt of $17 ,811. 99
BUDGETED ITIDf:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER: General
.
.
~,
.
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
'/\gr11 ? 19Fi2
~~onor~bl~ t.~ayor.~ City Council
ri~V of North Richland Hills
73:)1 N. E. lOOt) H·20
North í{ichla'od' Hills, Te~ðs 7611A
Re:
i- 1t r; f' T TV i)Ç ~1n~)T·H~ q T C·}J¡ Ai if' ~ r: t t:
"". ~, t·..,... · f .. t .'. .' .... ""!! ~1 ., .i,/ ,. ...Iþ"...........
'...'iT Y L ~ T'I .?~ ¡:':;~~~.f? (" ON CL ¡: ttU "1 t:'~..t Ì'R r'!~
.' '.1. Á ,f' J .l d"..."..".. . , 'i... ~ j} J...; ,.~" ", ' ' 'S-. . '0\ ...... . 1 . - ...... "'... t
r'~";HTr¡'~'Tn~'I..~ p.ff~'Tr¡1l :).,y ~"·~Tl":.L~i·~~ ~'lr)Å ']
\" .." ~ ~ ~ \ "\ ~,,: ... . ,. ....".;;., I .' .. _'j. .~..., _ '. .'. 'I
Enclosed is one (1) copy of Cùntractorts f\.rtia1 Pay Est1m1ite No.1,
\~atf~d i\Dril :>., 19~~~. r1ade pa.yable to C. :q. Feitlt~11 Contracto'r~ in th?
~~ount ()f $17,Bl1.99t for materials fun¡ísh~i and i4rJrk perfon1ed ün the
r~fe'r~nc~d proj~ct as of ¡'arch 31, 19d2.
Tf'1~~ quantities a~~ condition of the pfO,,1~ct hr1ve œen veri-ricd on-$1t~ by
YOt1r rel.r~sentati"e, Bill Rutl~d9~~ (15 indíC~1t.t:rl by s1gn~ture 00 th~~
e~tijf!ðta, and ~le h~v~ (:·hec!~c.,j th~ itê;'.:¡ ~~xtens1on3 ~no ;¡1dit1Qns.
~Jf\ rccorr~m~~rl that thi 5 pay~:;ent. in the a~fiunt of $17 ~ '311. çg, be nt.3~je to
C. R. Fe3zell Co·ntr~ctor, 3644 Garner Bl v~~. ~ {~rl1ntl·~on ~ Texas 76U13.
A,long \~/i'th a COP;)' of this letter'. the Ct)t)trðctor is bf~in~ furnishL~ a
tl;~fik estimate fonn far preµ4ri1l9 next month's estimate.
~
t4. 'ALBIN, P. E.
Rt1A :~.,
tf'1C 1 osure
cc: ~~Ir. Radger' ~l. Li~at C1t.y tJanager
(-'Jr. Cecil F()rf:5ter, D1rettnr of ?ublic Iforks + THIS C9py FOR
~~r. Bill Rutledge, C1ty Inspector
t~r.. f:.. ~. rea z\~11 t Contractor
550 FIRST STATE SANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
CON T RAe TOR I S
- - - - - - - -.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
ESTI~~~ATE
--- ----------.-----~_._---_...--.-
P 1 OF
FILE F354'
..._-_...._---~----_.._--------------._--------_.._~--
ESTIMATE NO.- 1 JOB NO.- 3-544
P.. CT DESCR I PT ION- UT I l ADJ. Od GLEf·W IE\'¡ DR. (BOOTH CALLO'..:A Y RD TO GUN',.: CT.)
0\' _R- NO~TH RICHlAND HILLS PLACE- r\IORTH RICHLAND HILlS DATE- 4/ 2/8:
TI~';Ë: CHA-RGE-D THRU PER IOD- 22 DAYS CO,'HRACTÖR~C~R-.--·-FfAiEi..L CO NT. --.-----------
FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND lABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 3/31/82
.YLQBX_Qe-P_E3-llA T ~3 /10/8 2 ÇA~~f\!DAri QA Y S- 65-_~O.1:l~LJ:I!.ºi'LÞA1.E_:___~{1~l--ª;
PREVIOUS THIS
U ;\1 I T EST I ¡"! A. TEE S T I t·LÄ T E
TOTAL
Ui\! I T
PRICE
.....-....---...------
NO.
I TE¡',;i D ESCR I P T ION
------- ......---- -.-.- -~~--.
------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
A ¡-'I 0 U '.~ T
_J_. - U l:LÇ~- ~_ L3..~1!.Ç:-¡ __ EX C. 0 6 D '- D l . F . 0 . 0 0 \,i . () I..i 0 . v 0 9 . 0 0 u . C \
2. UNCL. TRENCH EXC. 6-: :8~D-~~p-·L~F-:-----5-~-C-O------~-~c~Ó-----õ~-~O___lh2-~o-ao--------.---.-.;. "j_~
3. U'JCl. TqENCH EXC. 8'-1CJ' D. l.F. 0.00 a.OJ O.OCJ 15.0J C.G(
-- ~..!- U ¡'.JC_~ ~J;l'! Clj E XC. 1 0 ' -1 2' D. L . F . CJ . a 0 0 . 0 a 0 . C 0 1 7...!..º-º_____O . C ~
5. UNCL. TRENCH EXC. 12'-14' D.L.F. 0.00 o.ao 0.00 19.00 a.ac
6. UKCL. TRENCH EXC. 14-15" D. L.F. 0.00 0.00 O.CO 21.5a O.OC
7 ·-ª~~-J?JLC-.J.QIL 3 5l~_E '''1f~'l.J:JJ~J;.______I,._~ F ~____ 0 . º-º____Q_.-ºº--____-º _. 00 _ 3 .55 _ C . G C
8. DROP \:A,'-JHOLE EACH 0.00 O.OC 0.-0-0- 2-oc~Y.-cb--·--_h-_j.Jç
9. TYPE A YANHOlE.O'-5' D. EACH 0.00 c.oo 0.00 990.00 O.~C
.J.O_~~_J~DR_¡_~ ~ CL. 150 PVC _
WATER PIPE L.F.
11. 8"Xa" TAP. SLEEVE & VALVE
.-----..-------j~!~:l_A..~ V E BOX
12. 8tt GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX
13. 8" (C L. 50) Due T I LEI RO t'-J
~ PIPE - L.F.
14....-x61 I TAP. SLEEVE & VALVE
W/VALVE BOX EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00
15 .__DJ.lU tLU-1~.Ol~! FIT r-l.tiCiS______~:..Lf:3__~____Q. O-Y__2_2_Q._9_º_.____2 2.Q.,,_QQ_
16. 2000 PSI CL. B CONCRETE FOR
E :'.1 CAS E t'I EN T
1 I_·____c or\~ C£L~I~ DR I v E t~! A Y f~E P l/\ C E .
18. Ä.SPHAL T REPLACErv~Ej'~T
19.61. GATE VALVE & VALVE BOX
~ o. _.6_.!~__J(j_ ~__5_0__)__.__D_U ClI_~E-.IB 0 r'~
\/ATE~ PIPE
21. RE~aVE & RELOCATE EXIST.
-- .-_--E.. IB.-~_y"Q.BJ-1;\J T
22. EX. DEPTH FO~ STD. MANHOLES
OV~R 5 FEET
~.3...--C.RU.SH.ED___£I_O_~~ LDI'LI_V_EJiA Y
R E P L.^. C E ~/ E t\~ T
24. WATER SERVICE \iETER AND
-- ~-----BDX._.B_E LC_(AI~.o_;\! _______ EAC~H
2 5. S I ~,r G L E '.'1 ATE R S E ~ 'J ICE
CO rpŒ C T I O!\! T R A;'··: S F E ;< E A C H 0 . -:);) 0 . (¡ ;) 0 . 0 0 1 :3 5 . 0 0 0 . :; ()
26.-.~·!ATEH--SE_~'II_CLLINE -------- ---l-.£.----'O-..0-0___.Q..Qº--___Q_~_9_Q___y_~.2_~ . o. CO
27. S.Ä~,:. SE:::ER SE~\/ICE ---_____.___________
CO.'·: ,\j E C T ION T R A:·: S FER E A C H 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 0 0 . 15 C . 0 J C . C :)
28. A!--.!.._-Si'.J~ .--.S E~'! ER__S E:~)LI C E_LJ.~E____L.E .-__Q_. C O________Q_._ Q_Q.____. Q .00 9 . 90 0 .00
. . - . --·---_n_.n n _ _ .. .__ _ _ _ __._
EACH
EACH,
c.v.
__l . F .
L.F.
'::ACH
L.F.
~_!-S ·
V.F.
L.F.
O.OJ
420.00
12.95
..----~-----_.- ----...---,--.---
5439.00
420.00
0.00
0.00.
1.CO 1.00 990.00 99û.QO
o · 00----- o-·~-oo- 4 53-~-ðo-------..------6-:-J·-o
0.00
~-.º-~~º---.9_º_!..º_º--~-~-~...Q 0 -_J_9...ª ü . º-º
6 2 5 e, 0 0
1.70
0.00 0.00 0.00
9-!_Q~__º~_º-__--º-._Q c
a.oo 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
70.Ûü
19.90
8.Ûü
300.00
--
O.()~
-------. --.--. -------.------,
2 5 . C C J . J C~
0.00
'0.00
-
0.00
a.co
O.JJ
0.00
0.00
374 e..º-º-
C.OO'
r, t~.-"'
vavv
.. , "" ,...
\Jev"';
150.0ü
-----.---
0.00
o.co
0.00
95.00
---..--------------------.
112 J . a o·
0.00
---------
so. OJ
80.00
14.~O
r, ., '"
v.'vU
o . a o.
o .-Q-O--___O.JJ> a___~~lÇ_1 75 . C 0_____9.....!-ç._º_
.-.. .---,------- - . -------------------- -----------------.-----.-------. -------------..,--- ---------------.-----, --._... _h._
- --". --"...-
. .---..-----.. -....--.-----------------------.- -- -..'..---------.-.-.-.-........ .-. - -- ------..-. .-.--------------- .- -.....
--.-.------.-..
CON T RAe TOR t S
EST I :.-t Ä. T E
P 2 CF 2
FILE F3544
- - - - - - - -
------
S T I ;'-1 ATE NO. - 1 ~ 09 ;\! 0 . - 3 - 5 44
R;tJCT DESCRIPTION-, UTIL ADJ. ON GLENVIE~/J DR.CSOOTH CALLO',~jAY RD .TO GlNV~·: CT.)
.I.d ~O._~TJ·L.RLC H L A ~tD_j:LlLL5--,___._----.£ LA_C.E~_~tO.RIJ:1-R1.Cti.L~ D__J~l_LLS_____' D A .IE~_ .!+./ _2l.8 2
TI~\_ CHARGED THRU PERIOD- . 22 DAYS CONTRACTOR- C.R. FEAZELL Cot~T. .
OR ~ATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR PERFORMED IN PERIOD ENDING- 3/31/82
,dOEL1{_O_RD.E?__DA-T~- ~ /1018.2 CALEND~_LDAY.$~6_5 ·--C(llitE.LElION_DA_TE~_5j_1_3_IB_2._
--------.---
I T F ~-.D.ES.C R T P T I Qf'!
PREVIOUS THIS
~N-I T E 5.-LLMlLT.E-ES-I.11:1AT f
UNIT
T O-I.AL-E.RL.CE__-:__MIQ.UL\LL-
--~~-~-~~~~~~~-~~.~~~.~-~~-~~~-~-~~---
-------~ -~~-~--~
....-----.-,-....
.;...,,-.,.........-....--
--...-.....---....
-'- '--.- - _..
------------..-
IELD VE~IFICATION OF ~OB CONDITIONS
. ~~l D CON FIR ¡Vi A T ION 0 F PAY QUA N TIT I E S
~y- -t¿~_P-':~{f~_CtJ-ß:1)._________
--.-- __.J .O~·L~E£L!..£~~O..J.FC T R E£J'lE5.Et:IAT_I .~.E.J____~__.___.__._
DATE- ,19
--.-----------
....--------.--.....---... .~------
-~----------~~-~~-~~-~~
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I?P.R-OYED-
NOWLTO~-E~GLISH-FLOWERSf
CONSU TI~G ENGINEERS
lO_tA L --., --,.----.-'_1_-_8__'____11_.____.'__8 -_9_9_0_3 .t_ 0_0...
LESS 10 PERCENT RETAINED. . . III 990.30~
DIFFERE~4CE · · · . . . . . . .. 8912.70·
P L US 7 5 P E R C_ç :\! T , t~tA_I.l_S__9 j\!_H ~:1. Q_~.! --_~_~._9_2_!_2_2.'
TOTAL ...... . . . . . .. 17811.99
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS t . . . . 0.00
_r_. _.~--,---,_t~.I-2---~_Q_tEŒE.EtiCE_QVE T~1-C~SlJ :v'AI£--!~I!--,-_tI8_:LL_22
- - - - - - - - - - - - - f\l aTE - P þ, Y LAS T A ¡\I: 0 U N T S H 0 '/J j'~
INC.
J-'Ll.8-L_EAE~!'! I :'\Q_~----LI N~~E_I_~_J_~~~.::.~_---.29 O_3_!. o·~ TOI8_L_S I D-$
TIME CHARGED THRUTHIS PERIOD- 22 DAYS TOTAL TIME-
72479.05
65 DAYS
P E R ~t;. I\ T -=-__~.3 . Þ-º-...
PERCEt~T- 33.84
~,
-- --. -------------...
------
-------
.~.,- --.---.....---------------.-------.,----.--.--..,..-----------------------------.-.--- ----------.--------------
-~.. ,.--.-.--- .~- .-----.-- -_..~._- -------..- ._-----------~------_.__.,-,------- .-.-.....--.----., ..-----.-------------- ------...-....----.......-.---.- .-...--.. ---~-------- ---
.
. .------..-------- -".------------.
- ....-.- -----------.----...------------------....--- .--.---...---------- '..
-.. - -.---.--- ----.- -- -...----.---------.-.... -------..------- -- . ._---~---_._---_. - ..- _.,~- ..-
'4.·,__~_",_ ___....... _.______._.____
-- -.--.' ------- - ---------.--.- ------<---.---- - -...----.---------------.-------.---- ---.-----.---------------------------.----
.
.
.'
.
....'l
DATE:
3-31-R?
SUBJECT:
Phase III - Mackey Creek Channel Improvements
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BACKGROUND: The Tarrant County Planning Dept. has received bids on the channel
-------~........-.-.~
improvement project for Mackey Creek. This is the 3rd year that we have utilized
the Community Development Blck Grant"funds to concrete line portions of Mackey
Creek. Eight bids were received as follow~:
1. Bar 'Contractors, Lancaster, Texas
2~ Ashlar Contracting, Lewisville, Texas
3.' Jeske Const. Co., Dallas, Texas
4.' Civil Construction Co., Katy, Texas
5. M. A.' Vinson Const., Ft. Worth, Texas
6. J-N Construction Co., Richardson, Texas
.7. Hall Construction Co.~ Grapevine, Texas
8. M & D Construction Co., Ft. Worth, Texas
$106,227.37
$ 79",925.25
$ 78,967.05
$ -78,314.65
$ 75,406.38 .
$ 66,172.75
$ 64,002.00
$ 61,015.55
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQITIRED: Recommend to Commi 55 i oners Court tha t bi d be awarded
to M & D Construction Co. and the scope of the project be extended to utilize
the $80,350.00 available for construction.
BUDGETED ITEM: YES X NO
ACCOUNT NUMBER: Block Grant Funds
~~~----------------------------
.
.
:'
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
March 23t 1982
Honorable ~or and City Council
City of North R1chland Hills
7301 t~. E. Loop 820
North R1chland Hills. Texas 75118
Re: 3O-305~ CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HI~l:h..
MACKEY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS. PHASE III~
PROJECT NO. B81~48-2~
Bids were received on this date at the Tarrant County Plðnn1ng D9partment
10r the referenced project. This project includes emlcr-ete c~3n:1el l1m~r
on f-1ac key Creek frou Jerre 11 Street to Onyx D.-1 ve North. We wall 1 d req'Jas t
that this 1t~, be placed on the next regular or special Council meetin~
agenda for consideration of recommendation of Contract award by the
Comm1ss1o¡¡er's Court.
The individual bid tabulations are attached for your review. As the
tabulation indicates, bids were received from eight (8) contractors.
The low bid was submitted by M ~ D Construction Company, 201 N. E. 29th St..
Fort Worth, Texas 76112, in the amount of $61,015.55, with a total time
bid of 90 calendar days.
This proJiì:ct is being 1!:'up-ùed entirely by t{.U.û. through the Connunfty
Deve'ioplOOnt B10çk Grant Program. The maxi~:uM b\Jdg~ted funding for
construction of this project h~s been established at $DQ,350. We would
reconrnend that the scope of this project be increased by extending the
concrete channel liner. based on un;t prices bid ~n the proposal, in the
amount of $19,334.45, which is the differ~mcc in the buse bid of $61 ,015.55
and the total construction ft,¡r,àing avai1abl~ for this project of $80 )350.
On the basis of the bids subro1t¡cd, ,~ \~uld suggest that the City Council
recolili1eod tha·t the County Ccøm1ss1onerts Court award thfs Contract in the
aaX)unt of $00,350.00. based on tht~ unit prices $obmftt~KI in the proposal
and the estimated quantities of construction. to tht'! low bidder, M & 0
Constructon Cornpany..
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. MEIRO/267-3367
.
Page 2 -- March 23. 1982 -- Honorable ~or and City Council
We will bt present at the next Council meeting to answer any questions
you may have concerning this project.
,~
RWA :mh
Attachment
cc: Rodger N. Line, C1~ Manager
Hr. Cec11 Forester. Director of Public Works + THIS COpy FOR
r~r. Dalton Thrashert Program Coordinator
M & D Construction Company
.
.'
.
~._- ~~ e::: -.-- Cú 0 g Ci
OJ
t- (V') 0 0 (V) .
V') ro
z 0 · r-i .... ~ 0 N 0 U)
<:) N X r-i c..o CO ....... LO 0
U 1.0 Q) \0 (I) (V') ~ M N c::;T 0 ~
N CO I- ,........ N 0 ~ ~ .. Q) l.O
Z r-f 0 (..) ~ C) t.n
La.. 0 ~ 00 ....... c..o ""
V) . X.c: (j)
0 ZUO+-J I ~ I~
........zeas.... -d-
::> ....... 0 ex:> q- 0 B ê5
· :3: N l&J (Y') I 0
· ~O ............. ..... <..) . .
c:2: . . ,........ - - "" C> M ~
· 0 · .fJ r-t :z:: 0:: r-i
:E: u a. Ll. 00 ~ a.. C\J
w ~
:x:
(I) 0 l.() 0 8 b to
~ · co "" 0 0 ""
· xo
0 OJ to l- N 0 ~ .g N
U C) f- ,........ N en to CO ""
(V) to C> N N a c..o r-4 <:) ~
· LO ft c:;:T (.) .. .. . r Q) LO
~ C 0 ....-4 (Y) ~ ~
l- X 0 I ....... LO lO
V) oU') r-f I~ i-(;A
Z CQ -c (V)
0 s.... N to 0 8 0
u · OJ ............. UJ "" 0 0
· 0 ...c: ~ I-- (..) . . å
zu U r-t - - LO LO C
I Z · . ,.... N :z: a::: co 1"'-1 U)
'J ....... a.. ~ :::> 0- ~
I-E;A
ft 0 0 8 0 0
· r-t 0 0 0 0
0 · to
U xo l- N 0 55 0 N
......... Q) \D CI) ~ 0 <:) <:)
.. LO f- '" to 0 r--... .q 1.O (Y') 0 ~ ~
c::: LO 0 <..) ~ ~ ft r LO
}- ~ to r-f 0 r-f II:::T
V') XQJ LO ....-4 to \D i
Z OC I
0 co .,.... r-t ~ -(A :
u > ro 0 .0 ~ ¡O
eOJ ~ UJ 0 0 0
.--1 · 0 c.. """ f- (.) . · ·
-JU ttS I'-- \0 to ~ 0
c:2: z · s- r-f :z: ~ f'.. ¡.-c (V)
::r: t-4 a.. c...!J co :::;) Q.. r-I
~
· 1.0 0 8 ~ LO
Z .fJ N f'... 0 U')
<:) U') . .--t \D co ~ .~ LO
....... Xr-f .....
..... ...c: OJ \0 ~ \D co r-f
U I-t-f'.. .-I <:) r-f N M i~ 0 0 ~
=> 0"\ (V') .0 .r ft .. 0) LO
~ N ~ 0"\ LO L{') .-I
I- .c: N r-f II:::T \D
- V') · .¡...) I toEA ~
I- z WS- LO
<t: 0 · 0 N LO LO ~ ~ I
....J u 2:3 c..c w f'.. N I
............. I-- <..> . I I
:::) 0 · r-I . ~ - - f'... f'.. M ~ I
Q) C>ðQO-fJ r-f :z: .0::: to ......-1 I I
-« :E: U N I.J... co :::> 0... r-f I
r- ~ I I
.~ I a
I -
0 0 >- I I
- 0 ....... -l- I
I m . . ........ :z: - f'... CO ~ 0 I I
0 ~ -< f- LO CO 0 f'-i I
.--t ...J :z: 0) N . r-f I I
W 0... < .. I
.. en :::> ....... I a
W « C> I
~ ::r: I I
- 0.. I
~ I I
ft I
N en ..... .. · Ô · a I
<X) t- - >- >- I...L. I
Q) z: % . · ~ · I I
r-f W :::> u u -.J I
:E I I
.... W I
(V) :> I I
N 0 I
a:: ... I I
::r: a.. S- a
U :E OJ I I
c:: ....... c: I
c:::( .,.... a I
:E -J -.J I
Lù I I
Z r-t ~ r-- I
.. z: (:) OJ I I
LtJ c::( 0 t:: a
.-- :I: 0 ~ s:: I I
<C U I 't\ ra I
c CO ..c I I
~ q- ~ U I
0 lLJ I I I
~ I
- W U 0 ~
co 0::: :::> 11\ I I
-J U I 4- t'Ö I
....... r--C .r- I I
::I: >- CO :z: OJ -0 Ir- I
!J lLJ I 0 ..µ OJ 0.. I I
~ co .. <1J L I
U ~ l1.J - É s.... c: I I
~ l- I- u S- .,... I
--- :E I- < 0- .r- e:: OJ I I
~ U C - 4- 0 .µ QJ I
U W ~ U r- ..¡..> Q I
....... .. I""J , 0::: . ,.... OJ ~ I
ex:: :z: 0 (..) (: -a lJ.. r-- £n I
"" 0 ex:: #I (f) <1J C V')
Ot: ::r: - a.. , lLI ~ Er-- .c: E I- >- I
...... I- ~ S-<1J .µ 0 z c:::(
~ l- e
c::: 0... I- OQJ .,... U ::) 0 I
0 0 - z: r- 4- .µ 3: 0
~ 0:: ~ cV') - :E ~ (:)
u. ,z: w ~
, ......... .(.) :E :::> V) D- c::( ex: z
J: >- (/) c.... :¿ s::: 0": QJ U 0 0
:31 J- w 0 ~ '= c: r-- 0:::: ....J Z co
z C --1 LLJ en .,... a « Lú
l)' :::> w ~~ J- u I: u :r: ¡..-- I- -.J a
zl 0 > - s.... \D 0 c:( ~
U¡J.i u LO W ~~ ~ ·0 c '" I- u OJ
0 a r- 4- OJ I
ðª I- M .,..... U t:: QJ U
§~ Z 1 >- ß~ 4- . ,... :3: l"-
e::( 0 r- .,... ~ Q)
c:r: (V) ~ ~¿ V) V) et:: -C
O~ ~ 3 U1 c- ItS U
e::( ItS . . ,.... c::
zg l- .. ¿ r0- o r- a .......
~IJ . ð u 0 U I
.. 0 t: 0 s:::: = .--t
a::: :z: u :::> N ....... (Y) N
~ LtJ I en >-
.~ :z: ~ c co
3: 0 - . .
1° J co ~ N (Y) c::T
r-( N ~ 0 ..........
~ ~ f"- a M
. (.fi) \D
0:: . ..q- .-- 0 ~ ~ ~ ..........
0 x~ L() ~ r-t N
t- QJ L[) CI) 0 (Y) N 0 ~
N u C)I-~ f'.- <:> ... " m LO
:::> ~ 00 <....) L(') ~ ........ U)
LL. a:: ~ N U") 0
<:> t- xs- (V) r-i
V) 00) I I~ ~
z cc .µ '"
0 en N M ç;j- H 0
u ·CO N W .--. or;;::t (Y) q
· 0 u ........... i- <...) .
a:: u s:: ~ - - co ..-f ~ ........
I.J.J c::( .z: ·CO ........ :z: er: N .......... ........ (V)
a:;) ....... 0- -J N ::;:) 0- ..--i
lLJ .(A.
:x:: t.!)
(I) Z :", L() 0 0 0 LO
....... · \D N 0 (:) 0 N
}- XC)
U QJLO I- LO <::) 0 (:) LO
c:( (V) I- "'- (I) ~ N \D 0 N
~ r-t Q') 0 .-4 m to M m 0 ~
l- I"-- ~ 0 ·u r. r r. 0) L(")
Z QJ LO \.0 r-i ......- m
<:) X r-- LO ......-f \.0 f'.-
U Or- I ~ !~
C) -r- \D
0:: > M U") U ~ ,L.J
c:( · .V') ~ W N <::) 0
-J <:) .r- ........... I- u .
:r: . ~ ~ - - OJ l.O LO 0
(/)0 .<1J 1--i :z: ~ ~ ......- (V)
c:( u a.. -J N ::::> 0- N
~
. .--f l.() 0 (:) 0 LO
C) (V) <::) <::) 0 (:) 0
u ....... N
~ "LO I- lC} N 0 (:) ..........
· ("f") CI) ~ CO LO ~ 0) lO
CC=' ....--4 lU Q') en CO .......... 0 N Q) <::) ()-.Q
r-CV>x lO 0 r r. ~ ~ m l.D
V) OJ L() <.) OJ ex:> r-i 00 ~
z XJ- \.0 ........ L() '"
c 0 I '~ ~
L')CX) ~ ...--f
en N ..
W ·ra CO l.J.J LO <::) (:) <::)
~o.- ........... \.0 0 0 0
V) r- ~ 1-<....> . . .
l..LJ .rc:s r-t - - Q) ~ 0 m
~~a N % Q:: 0 r-t N
:::;:) 0- .(A N
U') U) 0 ~o 0 LO
0:: lO 0 <:) 0 lO
0 .
J- ~ LO ~ '~ g c::T
U ..... 0 00 N ..--f
:::> S- (I) r-1 r-t \.0 ~ M (:) I~
a:: l1.. N 0 n r r m LO
l- V) N '(..) 1O r-t CO
0 V') ~lts 0) M ~ '"
z ..µx CO
- 0 rc:sQJ I ~ ~
~ u ~J- N
~ 0) LO 0 0 ð I
--1 ...J r-i ~ ~ UJ q- 0 0 I
....... ·O'~ ........... J- <..) . · . I I
::J >UCOof-) M - - CO M \.0 ~ I
(I) ........ZOres ........ :z:: 0:: r-i .~ I I
<t: U ....... N ~ '" ::::> 0- r-t I
I- ~ I I
¿:
c:t: I I
0 I ...
<:) - >- I I
- 0 ...... -. l- I
. CO . . ....... :z: - f'... OJ ~ 0 I I
0 ....... ..::t f- L{') a:> 0 r-t I
r-t -J :z: Q) N r-( I I
l.LJ 0.. < . I
.. V') :::> .-1 I I
lJ.J ~ C> I
::E: ":I: I I
- a.. .
~ I I
~ Jo- I
N Vì .. · :J: . I I
a:> J- - >- >- ~ LL I
m z :z: . · . I I
r-t W ::;:) U U W -1 I
:E r I
... l.LJ ,
(Y') :> I I
N 0 I :
£X: . I I
:I: 0- S- I
U :E: OJ I I
0:: Þ-4 s:: I
ex: ar- a I
:E -I ...J I
lJ.J I I
Z 1'-t ~ r-- I
.. :z: 0 OJ I I
lLJ <x: 0 ~ c:: I
t- :I::. 0 t:: I I
'< U I ", I
0 CO t\\ ..c: I I
~ ~ U I
0 W I ~ I I
(/') - w u S- a
..-1 m 0:= ::) 0 ~ I I
....J U I ti\ Cf- res I
~ .-4 .,... I I
::r: >- co :z: Q) -c a: I
i"-.. W , C) .µ OJ I I
0 ~ C!) .. (lJ ::E I
z: U ~ L1J - ê s- c: I I
t-
-- « CJ: -< f- u ~ .'- I
--' ¿: t- o.. .r- e OJ I I
~ ::r: u a ..f-: 0 of-> 2 I
-
U lJ..J ~ U r0- o I
Jo--oo4 .. r-:> , cr: -..... OJ ..-. I
a: :z:: 0 <..:> ~ . ""0 LL- r-- en I
v;- a c:r: -1 CI) OJ ~ V')
~ - ~ Er- ...c:: I- >- I ..
....., :r: J- 0- .~~ l.I.J
~ I- S-<V .fJ 0 :z: c:::(
~. ~ 0- f- ~ c 00) -r- U :::> C) I
0 - ~ of-) ~ 0 -.
0 z ~
a:C z 0::: W CV) .. ::E a:: a
I ............ - (..,) :E ::::> V) 0- c::( c:::( z:
J: >- en 0- ~ C'1 OJ u a 0
~J J- LJ.J 0 1 I:: t:: r-- ~ --.J Z 00
z: Q --J ~~ W co . ,.... 0 ~ l..LJ
0- ::::J W l- t...: : U :r: I,....... I- ....J 0
zl 0 > - s- .~ 0 ~ Jo--oo4
~I u to W %~ 13 · 0 a J-- u en
0 a :~ r-- ~ OJ I
õª ~ (V) -,.... u c: OJ U
I >- 4- -r- :3: 1"-
~! c:::( 0 r- ~ -..... ~ Q) - .'
. .
a: ("f') ....-..c V) V) cc: . ..c:
0:::: z: V) 0- re u
-2 - c:J: ~ to . - ,.... c:
~i l- .. ~ r-- C> r- Q .......
. u 0 U I
.. 0 8 w ~ c 0 c: = ~
~1.W!3. 0: :z: :::> N ....... (V') N
~'--~ lJ.J CI) >-
~..~ :;c co 0 m
l~..'t .~.. 3:: 0 - . . . .
- <:) J co r-C N ("'t") rr:::t' ,
# ,
\
.
.
.'
-
DATE:
April 8,. 1982
SUBJECT:
Resolution
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: Tarrant Cou~administers a housing rehabilitation loan
program through the Tarrant Housing Finance Corporation. financ~d by the
issuance of tax exempt single family mortgage revenue bonds. The Tarran,
Housing Finance Corporation is planning a bond sale~Q~ tþispµrp08P ju ~þP
near future. Since North Richlarid Hills ~opulatio~ e~c~ed~ 20,000. añop~ioD
of the attached resolution is required to mak~ No¡th RichJand Hjl1~ hompo~pr~
eligible for this program. (The County aQmi~istpr~ thp prpgí~m in unincorporatp9
. areas and in cities of 20,000 or' less).
CITY COUNCIL ~CTION ItEQUlRED:
Approval of the attacqed {e~Ql~tion is reCOw~pn~~~
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t \
.
.
.'
.'
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI
BANK OF THE SOUTHWEST BUILDING
1150 CONNECTICUT AVE.,N. w.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
TELEPHONE (202) 452 - 6800
TELEX 89-2602
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
LANDMARK BUILDING. SUITE 200
705 EAST HOUSTON AVENUE
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78305
TELEPHONE (512) 224-5575
TELEPHONE (713) 651-5151
TELEX 76-2829
AMERICAN BANK TOWER, SUITE 1740
221 WEST SIXTH STREET
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701
TELEPHONE (512) 474 -5201
I N DALLAS
DUMAS. HUGUENIN, BOOTHMAN & MORROW
1509 MAIN STREET
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
TELEPHONE (214) 741 -3458
2 ST. JAMES'S PLACE
LON DON. SWIA INP
TELEPHONE (on 629-1207
TELEX 2831Ö
RICHARD D. HUFF March 3&,. 1982
PARTNER
Re: Tarrant County Housing Finance
Corporation Single Family Mortgage
Revenue Bonds Rehabilitation Loan
Program, Series 1982
---~---~--------------------------
The Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
To the Addressees:
The Tarrant Housing Finance Corporation (the
IICorporationll) is proceeding with a program to issue single
family mortgage revenue bonds (the "Bonds") in order to
finance qualified rehabilitation loans under the Federal
Mortgage Subsidy Bond Act of 1980. Such loans are intended
to finance the acquisition and rehabilitation of homes
located in Tarrant County that meet the requirements of the
home enhancement loan program, the parameters of which are
outlined in the attachment to this letter.
The Corporation was created and operates pursuant
to the Texas Housing Finance Corporations Act, Article
12691-7, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as amended, (the
"Act It). The Act provides that in order for the proceeds of
the Bonds to be used to finance rehabilitation loans for
homes located within a city in Tarrant County, the popula-
tion of which exceeds 20,000, the governing body of such
city must first approve the use of the proceeds of the Bonds
for such purpose. Accordingly, we have enclosed for your
consideration a proposed resolution which would evidence
your approval of the use of the proceeds of the Bonds to
finance rehabilitation loans for homes located within your
City limits.
March 30, 1982
Page Two
Because the Corporation wishes to sell the Bonds
as soon as market conditions are, favorable, the underwriters
for the Bonds have respectfully requested that you conside~
the enclosed resolution at your earliest convenience. Upon
adoption of this resolution, please return to us five
certified copies of the resolution. The sixth copy is for
the City's records.
In the meantime, should you have any questions
concerning this matter, please feel free to contact Mr. Bill
Carpenter of Kidder, Peabody & Co., Incorporated, San Antonio,
Texas, at (512) 828-2802, or the undersigned.
It is our understanding that the program to be
financed. with the Bonds will be discussed at a meeting to be
held in the Tarrant County Coœmissioners Courtroom, Tarrant
County Administration Building, on April 5, 1982, at 7:30
p.m. You are most ¥lelcome to attend this meeting.
Yours very ~ruly,
'~~.0·
/rl
Enclosures
cc: Rex McEntire, City Attorney
Mr. Bill carpenter'
~,
.r-
.
.
.'
.
TARRANT COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION
HOME ENHANCEMENT LOAN PROGRAM
PRELIMINARY PARAMETERS (DRAFT IX)
(Revised 3-15-82)
Homeowner
1. Must agree to live in Tarrant County.
2. Must make less than $35,000 (as determined by the Housing
Finance Corporation).
3. l\1ust meet suitable credit standards.
Home
1. Must be at least 20 years old.
2.
May not have a total adjusted cost (original cost plus
rehabili ta tion expense) greater than 90% of the average purchase
price of homes in the jurisdiction (as determined by feasibility
study: present "safe harbor" number is $71,400 for SMSA).
Example: Average Purchase Price
$71,400
x.90
$64,260
Maximum Total Adjusted Cost
3. Must require rehabilitation that:
a) . Costs an amount at least equal to 25% of the total
adjusted. cost of the house (or 1/3 of the original
cost).
Example: Maximum Total Adjusted Cost
$64,260
x.25
$16,065
Rehabilitation Expense
THUS:
Maximum Original Cost
$48,195
b) Leaves 75% or more of the exterior \valls intact.
4. Must be o\vner-occupied and \vithin the jurisdiction of the
Corporation.
5.
May be 110% of average purchase price in a targeted area.
Census tracts are 11.00, 17.00, 32.00, and 34.00.
- 1 -
(I ~
Loan
1. May be for a period not to exceed 20 years.
2. May not carry an interest rate higher than 1 % above the bond
coupon ra tee
3.
4.
5.
Lender
1.
2.
3.
t- 4.
Bond Issue
.'
May be either for rehabilitation or acquisition and rehabilitation.
Will be VA or conventional, with PMI required for loans above
80% to value.
May be prepaid without penalty.
Must be a qualified lender.
May initiate loans and assign loan service.
Must agree to package the construction loan, keep or sell it,
and be subject to a takeout from bond funds.
Must agree to, close loans with due diligence, but in any case
must make commitments within 12 months, and close within 16
months, after bond funds become available. Standby
commitments can be taken.
5. May offer from other funds to make a rehabilitation loan in
addition to the one in the program, even if the total acquisition
cost exceeds guideline amounts. Such a loan would be
subordinate to a loan und'er this program.
1. Is structured to mature with the underlying loans, but subject
to call in the event of early loan payments.
2. f\~ust be registered.
3. Will be rated by both services, possibly "AA."
4. Will include reserves equal to about 13% of the mortgage pool.
Fees and Expenses
1. The mortgage rate may not exceed the bond coupon rate by
more than 1 %.
2. Lenders will be asked to put up a 3% fee, 1% commitment and
2% origination.
.
3.
The fees may be recovered from the seller; if no seller, then
at the option of the lender, from the owner.
4. The second rehabilitation loan will be at such rates and for
such terms as are mutually agreeable between the lender and
homeowner.
5. Servicing will be 3/8 of 1 % net fee to lender at closing of the
permanent loan.
.
~,
.
- 3 -
~ .
.
.
.'
.
z
o
w
D
<
l')
.....
cr
o
~
ö
6
o
z
<::
.-
V)
t-
::::>
o
en
~
<:
[l.
¿
b
u
....
V)
o
u
~
co
Ñ
o 0
o ~ N
0_ ~ ~
~ ~~ ..
~ ~4J
'^ ~
_r-4êjE
c:; ..., ~
c....cCD
uE~a.
..!: CJ . ~
ct.... 5
c
o
¿
::
D.
~
5 ~.
-i .2-
E~ "i!
IDO ~
~N @J
£@J
o...eot",!!'
c 0 ~E
to:Ic
o 00
...14 0
-..ÞO
,.J 1/)"
cugO
EI.) ~ ~~
O-..Þ
.~.J£~
tc_
2Eog'
c -..Þ ~ .-
wgEg
.,z >--~
Eë.2-:,::
o 0 &J
:ru ct:
o
o
o
o
N
~
..
N
-..
w
?:
t-
c!
Z
~
W
t-
..J
<:
.::
z
:J
o
¡¿
'<:
C)
<:
:r
w
c:
.,
-.I
~
1"\
.r=
c=
5 ~
.J.¿!
E~
~@;
.
- I-
:ö~
2~
t!~
- ~
CD 0
E....
- C
-.I c.;
c_
~.J
C"'C
o C
UN
....
IQ.
W
~
t-
~
Z
a::
w
t-
.J
<:
.
"-
CD
I,)
~
C)
N
-::1 0 '" N
..:::1 0 '" .....c
. . . .
r-4 0 f"'\ Ch
....0 no
CD N n \.C
~ r-4 1"\
~
~
<1
~I
)( cf.
~ 0
~ N
~ )(
N 0
~"....O
-;:; 8 0..
E ci ~
-a)(~
-"O~IJ
~q ~ g'
c; 0 t.> CJ\
~~ :5 ~
o -., "'C"
¿~'..c.
"'OcZ~
- °ë -1 ~
Oa.uz
NON
nOr-4
.00'"
nO.....
<Q\l)N
N .::t
....
~I
~
C
~
E
~
CI;)
a..
~ -~
::;~.J
...,-"0
.., 0 C
r-4D.N
- 4
'"
N
~
......
<4
~
co
n
'"
0-.
'-0
~
.J
c:t
t-
o
t-
~~
...J
c:{
t-
o
t-
..,
r"1
.
r-4
'"
<1
~
to
4J
C
IJ
E
c
ca
o
...1
Q.
...J
W
J:
c:
Cl.
.I:.
~
C
C
:¿
IQ
.aJ
C
tJ
E
co
c...
.c.
4J
C
o
¿
"'D
~
en
"0
o
I/)
c
o
U
\,,0 \l)
ON
N r-4
o '"
Nn
~
c c
C,) &J
:J:J
~"'O
Q') C
r"1 N
013
r-4
....
'^
~
~
N
r-4
..:3
'^
""
4iA
J
c:t
t-
O
....
IJ
'-
..J
:::»
La..
Ð
'-
.J
:J
l1..
~N
CO ~
n~
'" '"
~ CO
'-0 N
o
r"1
.....
CO
n
......
CX)
0\
o
......
~
~
o
N
.... N
.J
ct
t-
O
t-
.,
&..
CO
CJ
>-
<1 ~
.:3 -
o
\.0
'" N
4 '"
NO
t"- f""'\
~
....
...,
n
o
o
....
~
~
aI'\
r-4
~N
to
l-
e
CJ
>-
J
<!
t-
O
t-
.
~
o
--t
:Þ
r
(f)
.
.
- ç -
N~I-'I-'I--'I-''''''''~''''''''I-'I-'
a~ro~~~Þ~Nl-'o~m~~~~~N~
Oa~~~~~~~~N~~ÞÞ~~~~ro ~
OO~I-'N~~mo~~~~~N~Þ~~~~ m
~~I-'~I-'a.......p.......~~~~~a~~~~~ n
r-r
o
~
~
~
a
o
\".J
J::-
.......
~
a
0"\0'\~0"\Q-\0"\0'\"'0"\G\0'\~"'0"\.....,J
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~C'\O'\Ü'\~~O'\O'\Ü'\O'\O'\O'\C'\~N
.þþ~~.þ.þ.þ.þ.þ.þ.þ.þ.þ.þ.þ
'i)\'o'-O'l)\.O'-D'-O~'lJ\.D'Í)'-D'Í)'D\.Q
. .................
DDaOOÞ~ÞÞ~~~.þ~þþþ~þþ
DOaOOÞ.þP.þ.þþþ.þPP.þ~þþ.þ
.(:At
P
\.A
V1
a
0'\
~
N
ffio
......1-')--'.......~I-'NNN'-"'\",..lP.þ\J1O'\
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CJNVJ~--.I'-DNV1CDI--'O'\OC'\N.t:::-
G\OV1\."J\.J..IO'\l--'aN'-OI--'-....JDC)~
\..Hv.I 0'\ 0'\ \.nl-' Þ 00"\1-' OO'\CDO'\V1
................... .
o 0 ,0 0 0 '-0 \.J1 .p- a \J1 V1 N I-' a ~ 0"\ ........ a V1 .....,J
OOaDal-'\.J1~NaCD~'-D"""'~V1~~I-'\J1
-EA-
~
C)
\.0
CD
~
\v4
CD
...-.
~~\.J1~\.J1~~V1~\J1~~V1V1\.J1~~~~0"\
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
pþþP.þþþpþþþ~~.þ'ÞÞÞÞÞ~
~~~"",,~~~~I-'~I-'~~~I-'I-'~~~\J1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
. .. . . . . . . . . . .. ..
~O'\O'\O'\O'\O'\O'\O'\O'\~~O'\O'\O'\O'\O'\~O'\O'\ro
oororooooomoomOOOOCDCDOOOO~CDmœoo~
-EA-
\"l
\.0
\".I
\.0
.þ
N
CJ
~
~"""''''''''I-'I-'NNNN~\".I.þ-O'\
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
þ~0'\0"\.....,JCD~~NPV1000~~~~~N~
~~o~O'\O'\-....JOV1~~o~a\.O~~~~V1
aaoO'\~~~ÞaN.....,JN\.J1am~OO~WÞ
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\.O~\.O~~"""'CD~~~a.....,J~CDV1O'\~C'\'-O~
~ÞN"""'~\.OCD\.OO'\~.þO'\.þ~~~~OO~~
l~
-0
<:
.
~
-0
CD
3):>
ror
:J~
r-rfTl
;0
Z
:Þ
-f
fTl
1-0 ~
. I-'
<
.
~
-0
OJ
3»
('Dr
::J-t
rrf11
:;0
Z
»
-t
P1
1-0 ~
. N
<
.
i
-0
;0
fT1
en
fT1
Z
--I
<
:Þ
r
C
(T1
en
t--'
VI
eft
.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INCLUSION OF
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, WITHIN THE
"ELIGIBLE LOAN A~EA" IN CONNECTION WITH
TARRANT COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION
SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS
REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM, SERIES 1982
WHEREAS, the Tarrant County Hous'ing Finance
corporation (the "Corporation") was created by a Resolution
adopted by the Commissioners Court of Tarrant County, Texas
(the "County") pursuant to Article 12691-7 I Vernon I s Texas
civil statutes, as amended (the "ActU);
.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Corporation
intends to issue its single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds
Rehabilitation Loan Program, Series 1982 (the "Bonds") in
order. to provide funds to purchase from participating
lenders mortgage loans that have been made to eligible
borrowers to finance owner occupied single family resi-
dential housing within the County.
WHEREAS, the Act requires that the governing body
of any ci ty located wi thin the County, the population of
which .exceeds 20, 000, must approve the usè of the proceeds
of the Bonds to purchase home mortgages for homes locat~d
·within such city;
WHEREAS, it is found and determined that it is
within the best interest of the inhabitants of the city of
North Richland Hills, Texas (the "ci ty"), and will promote
the public welfare and the public purposes of the Act for
the proceeds of the Bonds to be used to purchase home mort-
gages for homes. located within the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the city council
of the city of North-Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1. The use of the proceeds of the Bonds to
purchase home mortgages for homes located within the terri-
torial limits of the city is hereby authorized and approved,
and the inclusion of the city within the "Eligible Loan
.' Area" as used and defined in the Sale I Servicing and Admin-
istration Agreements to be entered into by and between the
corporation, PMI Mortgage Corporation, as Administrator, The
First National Bank of Fort Worth, as Trustee, and the
participating lenders is hereby approved;
.
/
~,
2. The Mayor, the City Manager, the City .
Secretary and any member of the City Council and any other
officers of the ci ty . are hereby authorized, jointly and
severally, to execute and deliver such endorsements, instru-
ments, certificates, documents or papers necessary or vital
to carry out the intent and purposes of this Resolution.
*
* *
PASSED AND APPROVED, this
day of , 1982.
ATTEST:
City Secretary, City of
North Richland Hills I
Texas
Mayor,
Hills,
ci ty of North Richland
Texas
( SEAL)
.
.
.
.
.'
.
CERTIFICATE OF CITY SECRETARY
THE STATE OF TEXAS t
COUNTY OF TARRANT I
I', the undersigned, ci ty Secretary of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, DO HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:
1. That the attached Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the Resolution adopted by the City Council
of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on the day
of , 1982, such Resolution being entitled as
follows:
RESOLUTION Authorizing Inclusion of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, within the
IIEligible Loan Area" in connection with
Tarrant County Housing Finance. Corporation
Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds
Rehabilitation Loan Program, Series 1982 .
2 · That the. original of such Resolution is on
file in the official records of the City Council and has not
been repealed and is in full force and effect.
WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF SAID CITY I this the
day of , 1982.
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills,
Texas
(City Seal)
.
.
.'
.
DATE: April 8. 1982
SUBJECT:
Tax Collection Agreement - Rohne & Hoodenpvl~Attorneys
DEPARTMENT: Tax
BACKGROUND: For many years the subject law firm has collected delinquent
property taxes for North Richland Hills, pursuant to an unwritten a8reement.
The firm has been compensated for t4is service from a penalty fee as provided
by the State Property Tax Code. The Tax Code was amended in, the last Legislative
Session to permit charging a higher fee~
It is proposed to formalize the agreement with Rohne & Hoodenpyl~ a$ prpyided
and ex~lained in the attached letter agreement.. and to adopt an ordinance
incorporating the provisions of Section'33.07 of the Property Tax Code in ordp~
to improve the City's delinquent tax collection program.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQUIRED:
tax collection agreement.
Authorize the Mayor to enter the proposed
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
-~~~~-~-~~~~~---~~~~~-~~~~~~-~-~~--~-~-~--~~~~~~-~~~~-~-~~~~~-~~~~-~~-~-~~~~~~-~-~~~
.
.
!
.
ROHNE & HOODENPYLE
WAYNE A. ROHNE
JERRY R, HOODENPYLE
ROBERT L. RUSSELL BUSH
JAMES E. LOBERT
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
1323 WEST PIONEER PARKWAY - SPUR 303
p, O. BOX 13010
ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76013
March 16, 1982
TELEPHONES:
(817) 277 -52t1
(214) 265 -2841
MR. RODGER N. LINE, City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820, P.o. Box 18609
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Mr. Line:
Receipt is acknowledged of, your letter of March 8 1982
enclosi~g a copy of a proposed ordinance adopting the pro~ision~
o~ Sectlon 33.07 of the Property Tax Code. This section is as
follows:
§ 33.07. Additional Penalty for Collection Costs
(a) A taxing unit or appraisal district may provide, in the manner
required by law for official action by the body, that taxes that re-
main delinquent on Ju1y 1 of the year in which they become delin-
quent incur an additional penalty to defray costs of collection, if the
unit or district or anothér unit thàt collects taxes for the unit has
contracted with an' attorney' pursuant to Section 6.3~ of this code.
The amount of the penalty may not exceed 15 percent, of the amount
of taxes, penalty, and interes~ 4ue. .' .' .... .
(b) A~ tax lien attaches to .the property on which the tax is. im-
posed to secure payment of the penalty.
(c) If a penalty is imposed pursuant to this section, a taxing ,unit
may not recover attorney's fees in a suit to' collect dëlinqucnt taxes
subject to the penalty~ . . ~. .
(d) If a taxing' unit or apprais~l'distri~t provide; fo~ a penalty un-
der this section, the collector shall deliver a notice of delinquency and
of the penalty to the property owner at least 30 and not more than 60
days before July 1_ . . . ,.
Added by A~ts 1981, 67th ~eg., 1st C.S~,· p.' 168, ch.· ~3,· § 130, eff. Jan. 1,
1982.
.
.
.'
.
March 16, 1982
Page 2
You will notice that this section became effective on January
1, 1982. It applies to 1981 taxes which remain delinquent after
July I, 1982, and to subsequent years taxes which remain delin-
quent after the appropriate July 1. It does not apply to 1980 'and
previous years delinquent taxes.
The Property Tax Code also provides for additional compen-
sation for attorneys representing taxing units and for the
recovery of costs and expenses in the following sections:
§ 6.30. Attorneys Rep~esenting Taxing Units
(a) The county attorney or, if there is no county attorney, the dis- I
trict attorney shall represent the state and county. to enforce. .the
collection of delinquent taxes if the commissioners court does not con-
tract with a private attorney as provided by Subsection (c) of this
section. '
(b) The- governing body of a taxing unit other than a county may
determine who represents the unit to enforce the collection of de1in-
quent tax~s. If a taxing unit collects taxes for another taxing unit,
. the attorney representing, the unit to enforce the collection ~f delin-
quent taxes may represent the other unit with consent of its govern-
. i~g body. ,. . .' \ ~ '. .'. ''', . ' ~
~ (c) The governing body"of a taxing unit may:ëontract with any:
.- competent attorney to rëpreserit the unit to enforce the collection of
delinquent taxes. The attorn'ey's compensation is set in the contract,
.' but the total amount· of 'compensation provided may not .exceed 20
. percent of the ,amount 'of delinquent tax, penalty, and int~rest ~oIlect-
:~ed.. .. ..__. - . ~:.~.,... .~:.,' -:, . - --... ... .>~.
?:..':1 .(d) ·To be, effective, ac~ntract \\?ith an attorney for the collection
:.: of state taxes must be approved by the State Property Tax Board and
............ .
-the attorney' generaì. . .' .,...' . . .'. ',. ", ,.'
, .,....... ... . I ... ._ . ~ \: ..
. (e) A contract with an attorney that does not conform to the re-
quirements of this sectic;>nîs void. : ' .'
Amended by Acts 1981. 67th Leg., 1st C.S., p. 126, ch. 13, § 28, eff. Jan.- 1, -
1982.
§ 33.48. Recovery of Costs and Expenses
(a) In addition to other costs authorized by Ia\v, a taxing unit is
entitled to recover the follo\ving costs and expenses in a suit to c'ollect :
a delinquent tax:. i
. . ¡
(1) all usual court costs, including the cost of serving process; !
. (2) expenses of foreclosure sale;
.
March 16, 1982
Page 3
(3) reasonable 'expenses, subject to approval by the court,
that are incurred by the taxing unit in detennining the name,
identity, and location of .necessary parties and in procuring nec-
essary legal descriptions of the property on which a delinquent
.' ~ is due; and
(4) reasonable attorney's' fees 'approved by the court and not
.... exceeding 15 percent of the total amount of taxes, pena1ties~ and
interest adjudged due the unit~. . . . .
:- .:"(b)-·Each item specified by Subsection (a) of this section, is. a
charge against .the"property subject· to foreclosure in the suit and
shall be collected out of the proceeds of the sale of the property or, if .
the suit is for personal judgment, charged against the defendant:
·(c) Fees collected 'for attorneys· and other . officials are fees of of-
fice, except that fees for contr~ct attorneys representing a taxing
unit that is joined or intervenes shall be applied toward the. compen-
sation due the attorney under the contract. . I
.' I
Amended by Acts 1981, 67th Leg., 1st e.s., p. 169, ch. '13, § 131, eff. Jan. I, !
1982. _. :
From the foregoing, it is my opinion that we, as your attor-
neys, are authorized to be paid on the basis of twenty per cent
(20%) of the amount of taxes, penalty and interest collected from
January I, 1982. We ask that the City approve this new basis for
our fees by having the Mayor execute this .letter in the space
provided..below.
On cases involving taxes for the years 1980 and prior years,
we will ask for fifteen per cent (15%) of the total amount of
taxes, penalties and interest due on cases we file in court. This
amount will be yours and would offset the amount paid to us as
attorneys' fees.
For the 1981 taxes, you must notify the property owner at
least thirty (30) and not more than sixty (60) days prior to July 1
of the imposition of the penalty on July 1 if the taxes remain
delinquent on such date.
If the provisions of Section 33.07 are adopted, you will not
be able to collect attorneys fees in a suit to collect delinquent
taxes (Section 33.07[c]) as you could under Section 33.48 were it
not for such adoption.
, The law prior to January 1, 1982, allowed recovery of
reasonable attorneys' fees -- up to 10% -- on cases filed in
court. A taxing unit was allowed to contract with an attorney for
up to 15% of the amount collected. The new law allows you to
impose a 15% penalty on taxes delinquent after July I,
irrespective of whether suit is filed to collect. The taxing unit
may now pay its attorney 20% of the amount collected.
.
.
.
.
.'
.
I · March 16, 1982
Page 4
Although it is impossible to forecast the financial impact of
this change, I believe it will be in the interest of the City to
adopt the ordinance and the provisions of Section 33.07. There
will be some confusion until all delinquent taxes have become
subject to the new penalty. This will have to be worked out.
We believe it is important -- particularly at the present
time -- to furnish us delinquent accounts for collection as soon
as possible. On those accounts which have more than one year
delinquent, we need up to date lists of both real and personal
property as soon as possible so that we may proceed with pending
litigation and so that the suits which we are currently filing may
include an intervention for the ci ty showing all delinquent
amounts owed. Those accounts which are delinquent only for 1981
should be turned over to us on July 1.
If the Council approves the new basis for our fees, please
have the Mayor sign in the space provided below and return a copy
to us for our files. We appreciate very much the privilege of
representing your City in this capacity and assure you of our best
efforts on its behalf.
Thanking you and with kind regards to th~ Mayor, the Council,
you and. your staff, I am
Jrs very truly
WA~iE
warjb
APPROVED:
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By
Mayor
.
.
.'
.
~ "
DATE:
April 8, 1982
SUBJECT:
Ordinance Adopting Section 33.07 of the Property Tax Code
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND:
Tax
See precedi~agenda item
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQUIRED:
Adopt ordinance
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
YES
NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
.
!
.
ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS, Sec. 33.07 of the Property Tax Code provides that a penalty
of not more than 15% of the Tax, penalty and interest may be added to such
tax, penalty and interest on delinquent taxes after July 1 of the year in
which they become delinquent when a tax unit has retained a private attorney
for the collection of delinquent; and,
WHEREAS, in order to defray the cost of collection of such delinquent
taxes it is advantageous to the taxpayers of the City of North Richland Hills
to adopt the provision of Sec. 33.07 of the Texas Property Tax Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TEXAS, THAT:
1.
The city adopt the provisions of Sec. 33.07 of the Property Tax
Code so that hereafter an additional penalty of 15% of the
delinquent tax, penalty and interest on delinquent taxes be
imposed on taxes becoming delinquent after January 1, 1982.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS
DAY OF
, 1982.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
Approved as to Form and Legality:
City Attorney
../'
~.i~
.
.
~,
.
~
1
2
3
-t
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
:0
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
3S
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
4-3
44
4S
46
47
..8
49
SO
51
52
53
54
5S
5ó
57
sa
59
60
61
62
63
64
;i.S. ::0. 3~
_I
SECTION 129. Sections)] .06(b) and (e), rl'opeL'ty ":'ax Code,
are amended t.o rcad as follows:
(b) To obca10 a defe\:ral. an il\~i.\·:.d\1al must fi.l~ \.lith the
ch1.ef apprai$er for the appla:sal dlstl"lct in \JhlCh the pl'ope~:ty lS
located an aifiòa\·it staClng t.he fac·ts l'equll:cd CO bt! e~t3bl:.sh~d
by Sub see t ion ( a ) 0 f t his see t i 0 It , The chi e f c1 ;::- P l' a ~ s e t- 5 h a ~ 1
no t i f Y I ~ ~ ~ - e 0 H t'\ t Y - aM dIe a c h t a x i n CJ un i t P a l- t. 1 C 1 pat 11\ g 1 n t 11 e
dlst.rict of the fillng. Aftel" an affidavit i~ filed undel' this
subsection, a taXl1\g unit may not Cile SUlt to collect delinquent
ta~es on the propet:ty unti 1 tht! individual no lonq~l· owns and
occupies the pL"Opel:ty as a t"esidence hOr:1estead,
(e) Each ïear the chief appl.·aìse1." COL" each atJP:.'alsal
d1 stl-ict I and-~ðeh-C'~~t'\~y-a~~e~~et'-~c-t ~ e~!~\' I shall publlC lze In a
man n err e a son a b 1 Y des i g n e d to no t: i f Y a 11 1.- e 5 ide 11 t 5 0 i the å 1st r 1 c: t
ore 0 U:1 t y the p t- 0 vis ion 5 0 f t his 5 e c t ion and, 5 p e c i i i c a 11 y. the
me tho d by \.I hi c h e 1 i g i b 1 e Fe l" son sma y 0 b t air¡ a de fer t" a 1 "
SECTION 130. Ch~pter 33, Propet"ty Tax Code, is amended by
adding Section 3).07 to read as follows:
?~~~...l U7_:-__~ûr;'! T !9rJ~~YE~'r\~ ~'f F("R _ C9LLt;CT !.9N_..f-ºST?~_ t ~ .l__~
~~x !.!:!9_ \.!~~ i~_ 5!._~ ~ 2P l· é! ~.!..~ ;..:~ t: 0_<:: ~__ ::....' '1_, . f' t:~·:'_l.ge.._~_ ~~~_r:.a_~~~~ ~
1:eguj re9__l?Y È~ _ ;.9.£_,9 f.fl: c_~ ~l.~s~ ;.?~.~y. th~_.u~~ ~.,t.~~~_~ ~~~,~__~l1~!:
;¿.~_~~ .~~_U!}~'e...!.~~_<?l!_¿l~ ~y _ !___<?_L_t:I:e.. ~e.~ ~:_:'l~_ ~~~!~h t..~1~Lbe~_~
detinau~nt incur an a¿òtt:.cnal pendltv to def::a'l cc·sts of
coÜe¿-;; lO~ i i the- liñ"i t M:h;;tî. ï:~t--Ct· -Ît~otl1e?·l'¡-1it:- tba-t.-- ëõi i ëCts
tax-es-' iõr the unit- hascontt~ac:-ed -·Wlt.h an ãt-~or:n~';---pu~'suant to
s;~ ~I~.l__ 6'-jÕ - Õ f~ 31.1 i ~-~~ 9 ~_~_-_~'_Jhë ~__a~~~;_t _ ~f _~þe p~a l~u~L ~<.?_~
~~eed _~.~~C~E\.!-~L tt:"'~_~mc~-.!1~.2-!_~ê!.X~ s....L--p~n_a 1 ty ~ and l n ~~~"e s_t:
due.
) De: !j, 2
'7-9601
tl?.> A t~~l_~~~'_l1~~~~D-e~t:h~_p_l"~~rt·/ on which t~e 5-_~'( ,is
~~~_~<?__~ec~.~_p~Y=E~_~~_~.l!~_E~~~!.~Y. ~
tE L-U __a_p~tla .~~i~~;!'p'~~~~ __p~' r_s\~ ~~ ~_ ~q~~ s~~£~i on_~
ta~!E.9_,:!I~,!.-~~~c:>~_!:.ec~x.~!_~~ t~~~1~~ fees .in a SUl t t.o c:>llect
delJ:.!.:.q~.~l)~.~é!~~s_s':!I?J ~~__to _~~_p~t~~! ~y ~
(d) I f a taX-!.l~g~E.i.t"~.!· ~P.P;-~..!.~~ !..._~~:> ~£~ ç~--providt::~~
~!\altY~~1.der this_~~~~i~~~t~~.-£<?llecto~'_~J.\.all deliver a ~otice of
de~\.tencY~~1~~~~.~_penalty_~C?_t._~e-E.!~"p.P~~Si~..,,;ner at. least. 30
and not ~.10re thai, 60 days b¿fol-e Julv 1.
--sÈcT1õN13~-Seëti'~- Jj-.48Cã):-p-rop~rty Tax Code, 16 ar..c:1ded
to read as follo~s:
(a) In addition to oth~l costs a...,thol-ized by lay, a taxing
unit is ent1tled to recover the follo·.....1.nq costs and e)(p~nses in a
6uit to collect a delinquent \.ax:
(1) all usual C0urt costs,
including
the
of
cost
servir.g process;
(2) expe~se5 of foreelosur~ sal~;
(3) reel sJnab le exp~nse s L_ ____~~~j-~~~---~~.~pp.~va 1
(ðpp~ov~~l by the courtL that are incurr~d by the taxln~ unlt In
determinlnq the nar:!~, identity. and location of necessary part.ies
and in prOCl1rlnq n~cessarï leçal dE:5Cr~ptl011S of the property on
......hieb a dellnquent t.é\x. 15 due; and
(4) reasonable õttorney's fees approved by the court
ar.d not exceeding 15 percent of the fot.al amount. of taxes,
penalties, and interest adjudged due the unit.
SECTION 132. Sections 34"03 (b) and (c). Proper~y Tax Code,
are amended t.o read as folloy~:
(b) If no claimant estdblishes entltlement to the proceeds
wit hi n s eve ~ yea r 5 , the c 1 e r k s hall ~.! ~ t r ~ þ~ ~~ t h_e_ _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IE.. c ~ e d s
!: 2_ ~ ~ ~~ _t ~ ~ ~!:\_L un i .!._ p a t' t 1:.C: !E ~ ~ !-!~ g,_.;~~ ~ _ s a ~ ~ _~ I.!~.!!-~ ~'!..~~.9..~~.! ~
~~~'p_l~<?port i on 1 ~~~_~~!=:~'__P~!!~!. ~~~-L- _~n~ __1:.~~~ r.:~:: ts__be~~' __~~_ ~h~
£.~~~ 1. 3:':\oun t 0 f t:axe5~~~\~!"~ ~~~~~i~! ~.~ ~~~~.~l!~_~ ~ !.-E~.~. t lC :.£~~~~
1n t.he sale ltt'a~~M~t.__'!~e-F't'ot!e-=~~-~~-tM~-6~a~~-'i:'et\o~~e~-a;el'"\q
~~~~:~~~~;~~~_on_a_for~-pt'~~~~~ðeò-oy--t~~--eo~p~t'~i~~~--e^ow~n1
th~_ð~y~e_a~d_~~~b~~-of-~~e-eaee-ð~d-t~~-ee~r~-it'om-w~~e~-eKee~~~O"
~oð~~d~___~he__~reað~~e~--eha~l--paY--tne-p~oee~dð-t~~ð-~~e-6e~et'A~
t
~.
~.
48