HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1982-07-12 Agendas
. .-
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
.the t~eeting July 12,.1982 ~ at 7:30 p.m. t in the City Hall , 7301 " .E". loop 820.
NUMBER ITEM .. ACTION TAKEN
. .
PRE-COUNCIL
h · ~() 'P M
1. Briefing on Tarrant County Water Supply
Project Raw tvater Rate Settlement
2. Briefing on Rufe Snow Drive, Phase II,
Drainage Problem Between the "RailRoad and
\{atauga Drive
~ ..
. ..--.. .....'- 1 b..
~USSion of Other Items
COUNCIL
__I 7:30 P.M.
1 . ~1l to Or<ier -. ._- --- f ----... ~ "'Þ
J À.A
2_ Roll ~al1
3. Invocation
4. Considertion of Approval of ~linutes of
...
June 28, 1982, Council Meeting
.
..
5. Presentation of Five Year Certificate and
Sery;ice 'Pin to Mrs. Wanda Calvert -
Planning & Zoning Department
-.-4- .. .
6. IConsideration of Appointment to the
I~able . TV Advisory Connnittee
_. .-. - _.,-. -- . '.-
.
7. PLflNNING &'ZONING - PS 81-65~ Request of
Nasser-- Shafipour for Final Plat of "Lots
.....~....
1 & ") Blö"c~k 3, Red Gate Addition
... ........ L ,_ - ..... ... -------------- 1
(East side Qf. Davis - South of ~1ockingbi rd)
Page 2
CITY OF NORTH RfCHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
f,)r· the Meeting
.Tllly 17) 1982
, at 7:30 p.m.~ in the City Halì, 7301 N.E. Loop 820.
NU~ER
ITE~1
. ACTION TAKEN
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 82-14
Burk Collins for re- lat of Lots RIB &
R19 Block 4 Colleoe Hill Addition
8th Filin .
Southeast corner of Abbott Avenue and
PS 82-16
~-
of Lots
ock 2
East side of Davis and South of
Rumfield Road)
-
I
PLANNING & ZONING - PS 82-17, Req~est~
10.
John w. Barfield for re~p~at of L.ots 5A ~
-- . - - ~
& 5B~ Block 1,. Crest'tvood Estates
.. (South side of Elm Court and l~est of
Davis)
11. Consideration of Auuroval of Ordinance
on Texas Electric Service Company ..
.-
Ftlel Adiustment Cost
- -
12. Consideration of Approval Qf Resolution I
-- St~~ G~S Company
Suspending Lone Rate
Increase .Request
~
13. -, Consideration of Partial Payrnen t "
_.- I -
Estim?te 118., to Austi!1 Road CompaI1v in
I -
--L the Amoun t of $30,,548.35 - Rufe Snow
, Drive - Phase I_
-- ~- -
-
-
. ,..
Page 3
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .
. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Fo;· the Meeting July 12, 1982 , at 7:30 p.m. t in the City Ha 11 , 7301 N.Ë. loop 820.
I
NUMBER ; ITEM ACTION TAKEN
14. Consideration of Awarding Bid for
Traffic Signals - Davis Boulevard and
Þlain Street
15. Citizen Presentation
...
16. Adiournment
. .
~-
. .- . ... - .-
1
_.- --- - .' ....... ¥--- v
- .- I
.>
..
...
------ -
-
- -
-
-
...¡----
-
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301
NORTHEAST LOOP 820, JULY 12, 1982 - 7:30 P.M.
re
I
\
1. Mayor Faram called the meeting to order July 12, 1982,
at 7:30 P.M.
2. Present: Dick Faram Mayor
Richard Davis
J. C. Hubbard
Dick Fisher Councilmen
Jim Ramsey
Marie Hinkle Councilwoman
Staff:
Rodger Line Ci ty r~anager
Jeanette r~oore City Secretary
Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager
Rex r·1cEnti re City Attorney
Richard Albin City Engineer
Gene Riddle Director Public Works/Utility
Lou Spiegel Director Finance
Margie Nash Planning & Zoning Member
Absent:
Jim Kenna Councilman
. ~:a ro 1 d Newman Councilman
3. The invocation was given by Councilman Hubbard.
4. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve the minutes of the June 28, 1982 Council meeting
Motion carried 5-0.
5. Mayor Faram on behalf of the Council presented Mrs. Wanda Calvert
with a Five Year Certificate and Service Pin.
Mayor Faram advised he would depart from the agenda at this
time and asked Mr. Line to introduce an old-new Public Works
Director.
Mr. Line introduced Mr. Gene Riddle, Public Works/Utility Director.
Mr. Line stated he felt the city was fortunate to have someone with
the experience and capability as that of Mr. Riddle's.
.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION
CONSIDERATION OF
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OF JUNE 28, 1982,
COUNCIL r1EETING
APPROVED
PRESENTATION OF FIVE
YEAR CERTIFICATE AND
SERVICE PIN TO
MRS. WANDA CALVERT -
PLANNING & ZONING
DEPARTMENT
Mayor Faram on behalf of the Council, welcomed Mr. Riddle
back to the City.
6. Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to appoint Reverend Ray Fulenwider to the Cable TV Advisory
Committee to replace Dr. Hal Brooks.
Motion carried 5-0.
7. Mayor Faram stated the Planning and Zoning Commission had
recommended approval. All engineer's comments had been
met and a covenant for future improvements of Davis Blvd.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve PS 81-65.
Motion carried 5-0.
8. Mayor Faram stated the Planning and Zoning Commission had
recommended approval. All engineer's comments had-
been met and additional easements for TESCO and Southwestern
Bell had been added to the plat.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve PS 82-14.
Motion carried 5-0.
9. Mayor Faram stated the Planning and Zoning Commission had
recommended approval.
Mr. Line stated that he had been made aware of a problem.
that might exist concerning the property that might involve
flooding of the adjacent property. Mr. Line stated the staff
would like to have a couple of weeks to work with the people
involved. Mr. Line stated he had discussed this with
Mr. Barfield and it would not cause any problems for him if
the request was postponed until the regular Council meeting.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Davis,
to postpone this request until the meeting of July 26, 1982.
Motion carried 5-0.
July 12, 1982
Page 2
CONSIDERATION OF
APPOINTMENT TO THE
CABLE TV ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 81-65, REQUEST OF
NASSER SHAFIPOUR FOR
FINAL PLAT OF LOTS
1 & 2, BLOCK 3,
RED GATE ADDITION
(EAST SIDE OF DAVIS-
SOUTH OF MOCKINGBIRD)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-14, REQUEST OF
BURK COLLINS FOR
RE-PLAT OF LOTS R18
& R19, BLOCK 4,
COLLEGE HILL ADDITION
8th FILING
.(SOUTHEAST CORNr- QF
ABBOTT AVENUE Ah_
COLLEGE CIRCLE)
APPROVED
PLANNING & ZONING
.PS 82-16, REQUEST OF
JOHN W. BARFIELD FOR
RE-PLAT OF LOTS 48A,
488, 52A and 52B,
BLOCK 2, STONYBROOK
ADDITION
(EAST SIDE OF DAVIS
AND SOUTH OF RUMFIELD
ROAD)
APPROVED
10.
Mayor Faram stated the Planning and Zoning Commission
had recommended approval.
·
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Counci1.man Fisher,
to approve PS 82-17.
Motion carried 5-0.
11. City Attorney McEntire stated he had met with Texas
Electric and this ordinance was primarily a procedure
problem as a result of Judge Jones· ruling in December 1981.
Mr. McEntire stated the problem was how the fuel adjustment
was computed.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve Ordinance No. 963.
Motion carried 5-0.
12.
City Attorney t~cEntire stated time was needed to study
this request and asked the Council to suspend the request.
Mr. Mc~ntire stated the date should be June 29, 1982 and
not June 24, 1982.
·
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to approve Resolution No. 82-19, with the date changed
to June 29, 1982.
Motion carried 5-0.
13. Councilman Mubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to approve partial payment, Estimate #8, to Austin Road
Company in the amount of $30,548.35, funds appropriated
from Bond Fund5.
Councilman Davis asked for a status report on the request
for an extension of time. Councilman Davis asked if the
motion needsto be amended to include the extension of time.
Mr. Line stated the recommendation was not for approval
of the extension of time, only approval of the request for
payment. Mr. Line stated a recommendation would be
submitted at a later date on the request of the contractor
for an extension of time.
Councilman Davis asked if a completion date had been given.
Mr. Albin stated no, but the contractor seemed to be on schedule.
·
July 12, 1982
Page 3
PLANNING & ZONING
PS 82-17, REQUEST OF
JOHN W. BARFIELD FOR
RE-PLAT OF LOTS 5A
& 5B, BLOCK 1,
CRESTWOOD ESTATES
(SOUTH SIDE OF ELM
COURT AND WEST OF
DAVIS)
APPROVED
CONSIDERATION OF
APPROVAL OF
ORDINANCE ON TEXAS
ELECTRIC SERVICE
CO~~PANY FUEL
ADJUSTMENT COST
APPROVED
ORDINANCE NO. 963
CONSIDERATION OF
APPROVAL OF
RESOLUTION SUSPENDIN(
LONE STAR GAS COMPAN)
RATE INCREASE REQUESl
APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO. 82-19
CONSIDERATION OF
PARTIAL PAyr1ENT,
ESTIMATE #8, TO
AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY
IN THE AMOUNT OF
$30,548.35 - RUFE
SNOW DRIVE - PHASE
PHASE I
APPROVED
Mayor Faram stated he would have to call this discussion
out of order because the consideration was for the payment.
The extension of time request would be discussed at a later
date.
Motion to approved carried 5-0.
14. Mr. Line stated bids were taken last Wednesday, July 7th, and
the staff did not have time to analyze the bids and get a
recommendation prepared by the time the agenda went out
Thursday. Mr. Line stated the recommendation was to award
the contract to the low bidder, Southwestern Electric in
the amount of $33,430.80, which was $4,262.86 under the
next low bid and substantially lower than the Engineer
estimated. Mr. Line stated this was a badly needed improvement
and the staff did not want to delay the award of the contract.
Councilman Hubbard moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to award the bid to Southwestern Electric in the amount
of $33,430, work to begin 60 days after receipt of equipment.
Mayor Faram stated there was some variation in the dates,
September 15, 1982, to January 1, 1983. Mayor Faram asked
Mr. Horvath if he had made contact with the companies.
Mr. Horvath stated he had contacted Southwestern Electric
and had received a letter from Sharrock Electric, second lowest
bidder, indicating that they may be able to get the equipment
quicker than Southwestern. Mr. Horvath stated Southwestern
had advised him they could get the poles in six to eight weeks,
the same as Sharrock. Mr. Horvath stated that when the contract
is prepared, he would get a firm date from Southwestern Electric.
Mayor Faram asked if there could be an assurance before the
awarding of the contract that they would be within fifteen days
of each other.
Mr. Horvath stated yes, if not the staff would bring it back
to the Council before awarding the contract.
Councilman Fisher asked if this signalization would break up
the traffic flow between Main and Emerald Hills.
Mr. Horvath stated he felt it would break up the traffic flow.
Motion to approve carried 5-0.
July 12, 19ß2
Page 4
CONSIDERATION OF
AWARDING BID FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNALS -
DAVIS BOULEVARD
AND MAIN STREET
APPROVED
·s.
I
I 16.
I
.
'.
None.
Mayor Faram adjourned the meeting of July 12, 1980.
July 12~ 1982
Page 5
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
ADJOURNt~ENT
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
-.---.-----------
Trinity River Authority of Texas
.
General Office
----------------------
7002.100
June 29, 1982
The Honorable Dick Faram
Mayor of North Rich1and Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Mayor Faram:
Subject: Tarrant County Water Supply Project
Raw Wat€r Rate Settlement
.
On Friday, June 25) 1982, the Texas Water Commission accepted a joint motion
from all contracting parties to the Tarrant County Water Control and Improve-
ment District Number One supporting a settlement on the raw water rates charged
by the District. This significant action represents a milestone in the Au-
thority's efforis to secure a fair and equitable rate for raw water purchased
from the District. In order for th~Water Commission to approve the settlement,
certain official action was required by the District's Contracting Parties
(Fort Worth, Arlington, Mansfield and the Trinity River Authority) within an
extremely short time-frame.
Throughout the past twenty fqur months, the Authority·s Management has com-
municated and coordinated closely with your City Manager to keep him abreast
of the position and action being taken by the Authority representing you as a
Customer of the TRA Water Supply System. We have furnished information to your
Staff as information was available, but it was not until the last two weeks
that the Authority could state with conviction that the settlement being pro-
posed was advantageous to the Authority's Customers. In order for TRA to per-
serve our Customers· interest in the proposed set~lement, it was necessary for
the TRA Board of Directors to take official action agreeing with the proposed
settlement on June 23, 1982. This action was taken to perserve your interest
in what we conclude is an excellent opportunity to reduce future raw water
costs for your City.
The Trinity River Authority Board of Directors voted unanimously to participate
in the settlement but specifically requested that TRA Management advise the
governing bodies of our five (5) Customer Cities of the action taken. This
letter is written to request an opportunity to present to your City Council the
details supporting the Authority's decision to be a party to the rate settle-
ment. Since the rate settlement requires that the Trinity River Authority
P.o. Box 60
Arlington. Texas 76010
(817) Metro 467--4343
¡ ..,..
7002.100
June 29, 1982
The Honorable Dick- Faram
Page Two
amend its contract with the Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement
District Number One at the Authority's August 25, 1982 Board Meeting, we
would like the opportunity to explain the far-reaching benefits which will
accrue to the Authority's Water Supply System before the Authority's Board
Meeting. We would be happy to present our information at a work session be-
fore one of your Council Meetings, at a work session called specifically for
that purpose, or at any other time you desire. Please let us know of a
convenient time to visit with you.
/ b a 'II
/1/11-
xc : Mr. Rodger Line, Ci ty Manager -,j:~,'"
Mr. Jimmy C. -Payton, Chairman, Executive Committee, TRA Board
of Directors
Mr. Warren N. Brewer, Regional Manager, Northern Region
Attachments (3) - (Brief History of Events Leading to Settlement)
(Settlement Agreement with Attachments)
(Oeloitte, Haskins & Sells' Summary Tables)
~,~
~~~
\/.
~.:
.,;'~
!
..
!,arch 31, 1932
:~t'. C~c11 For~st{~r. Di roct()r of PuÞl1c \·JOt~~.$
City of !'~orth Richl~f\d Hills
7301 ~.(. Loop 820
North Richliiod J{ills, Texas 76118-
Re: 3-21Ht C!~y t}F ~~OHTH ~IC}!Ll\!~J ~1rLLS t
"Hr.O:ï: S: !t)þ~ qp I' f¡:" . op !iSt:L. ! I .
~ ,1._ ~ .. , ... y "'-.,' '. ,.,. .. .-J:.
~AVI ~~G AHD DRf.\l Ni~(:;£ I~'1?Rr)VE~~t::~TS
t-t'"
.
P~r~ua¡-}t to our cor.varsat1o(¡ yestûrd¿y~ this 1s to clarify lt~~ statu5
of our d.1roct1vc hy the Uorth R1chland !til1s City Council concerning
stOrt1 wõt.G}" hand'11n; 0;\ Rufe Snow between tha railroø.d cine.! ~:ataug.1 Driv~.
1Jt= dre ~nclos;nç; our latter da t.ee October Z'). 19~!C. \~Jhich outl in~5 the
c1rCuT~st;.lnCes surrounding the Couocil's d~c1~1on to elif11o~te our proposed
U!'df~~Jroun~ ston~~t se\-/er S~tst~~t in nufe Snow ~~tf-J~en the r~11 read a~d
\;atauga Dr1v<? wTIich included prùpos~d constr\'!ct1Qn of r:fi Qff-s1te
storel drain in \Jðtau9d alan'; St3rdu~t Drive) as ShO\-H1 on ttH~ attached
sketch. This systCf1 \t!JS dt?s1~nQct to handle the ru~off ~~cn~r\}tcd slong
the (~!1st s1d·~ of Rufc Sno~ and convey. it we:;t'.\'3rd un{~~rgrolJnd ttt thù
existing drainage cbannel in Wðtauga's Sunn.ybr·oo~ ,,\ddition to avoid
overloading Stardust Drive. ðrid Orchard lane w1th excess surfac~ w1t~r
runoff. l~a estir~1ated the cons truction of th1 s underground systc.:1 to
cost $29û.(}0().
?resê!'\tl y, ;nos t .')f the s tQr;:1\\fð t~r runoff gene ra tl~d f fOiJ tha 37. J act'e
areð Eé1St of ~.ur& SnO\1p drains $outhw~st~~arj to Rufe Sr10w tirive ,;t{h~rc it
1$ tt1~~n cnnv~ved soùth\.Jard alono r-tufe Snow tQ tha rail road 1·1~ht"'of-wa\l.
~\)st of th1~ runoff :rlhich cûlleéts a10ng the n·orth railroad t"1ght-of-\a:úy
is th~~n conv~y~d .un~t~r th~ r;111r~o"d thro~gh an existin9 box cu1v~rt
east of Rufe Snow to the south rililroùd right-of-W8jl ditch, then chanf1el(~d
cas twa rd a ì nng the ra i 1 road ri9h t-!)f-wQY to Cè 11 o~4ay Draneh. ~.11 add1 t1 cnal
excess runoff frŒ~ p~ðK sto~~s ovcrtaps Rufe Snow and dra1ns westward
int~ Hðtauga's Sunnybrook Add1t1oo.
.
\-tith the proposed 1~11r.11nat1on of the 0x1st1ng county road sectiOf! on
~ufe SnO\i and the constrJct1ûn ~f a nerJ fjD-f~~t ~/1l1a paVê~:1ent s~ct1on
\-11 th cu r~b and gutter. a 1 a rger ql:,:1 n t1 t.y of rt:noff fr~~ th 1 s 37 It 9 ~'3Ct"C
area cast of RufÐ $i10\'I ~111 r~ intercepted ~f1.1 c,'t-r1Qj \::zst';far~ into
~~tauga at Stardust Drive and Cr~chard Lane than i)restntly drains at th~sc
locations. Furthcmoret as the 37.9 acre arca in ~!orth ~ichl~nd ~111s
dcvelop5. these runoff quantities \/111 ~ increased and with site grdd1nf.;
and 1\1ndfil11ng, 1t is concciviibl~ that runoff fr~.1 the cnti,·~ 37.9 ðcrp
areð ;~ight he d1"ert~d frœ! the railroad and drained cOr;1rlet~ly onto
Rufe Snow. Tho rcsult1n~ potential for flooding in the 5~nnybrook Addition
\-foul d thus be ; nc,·ùa seod.
Page 2, Cl!c11 For~stt"r. ~'~arch 31,1982
i,Je offer the following courses of acti~n conc~rnin~j this ma tt~r. f{)r
your consideration. along ~1th our analysis of some of tho possihlu
cons~~tlcrces of each:
"
~.
CarIs truc·t j;\d~rQrcut1d stOM rJr,31nao:J $vster1 1ft Rufe Snow b~t\/et~n
th~ r~ilroad ana ~ðtauga Raad alon~ w1~h off~s1te stonJ drain
thrt)u\!h the Sunnybroo},: .Ad,j; tion.
1. It is unliJ.':c1y that the pro~rt,\' o~.;ners who front Ruf!! Srao't\
b~tween th~ railroad ao1 Uatauga rroad would a~r~~ to P~j for
aäd1tfona1 stem dr.11nage ass'essncnt since the naxinUL1 total
ass(;s-s~r..~nt r-!l t~s héVC ~, rcù:1.y beat1 s~t ð t the AS5~5~~'C!1t He(Jr1nü
held March 22, 19ßZ.
2. If t~e property owners in this section õre not !ssessed for
ston1 drainage then this would not t~ consist~nt with the
ctrði~~Je asseSS~lcot p:;licy astablish£~ 11 oth~r clrairH)~3e
ercas.
:3. The- ~ratðt¡gð Ci t.y Counci 1 tt:ð)' r~ot pf1t:i!; t ê street cut 1ft
Stardust Drive for construction of the off*~ite stom dra1n
unless t~8 entire street is o~cr~aya1 in addit1Gn to pav~-
nent r(!plac"'~;¡ent over the storr:, drain trench.
4. If ð11 l}ltúrnate off-site ston~~ drainaçje routt.! ~cross rr1vatß
property is feasibl~. ðS shown on the ðtt¡}ch~d sketch, then a
pé J"~!~a nttnt é r:t i na ge e a sC--J(:nt \"1; 11 hÐ" ~ to be l~(¡U í t''Ù,j, :: n¿
ccnstt'uction bet\rJe~l1 -two residential hones on Skylark Lane
n~y also bs required.
5. Cxisting t~pograDhy li21t~tions ~il1 not p~IT~it construction of
an underground storr,~ dra1natj~ syst~ in Rufe Sno~'1 which would
b~ d~si~ln~j to dis:harge- ~t the ra11rQ~è ri~Jht-cf...,/ay.
3. Provide concret~ val1~y gutter~Ø1n ~ufe Snow at Stardust Drive and
at Orchard lane to drain all storr;) ~!ater runoff frŒfi aufe Snow
\\'eS t~lard tQ Sunrtybro()!~ p,ddi t1on.
1. nefore the areð ~a$t of Rufe SnCtl dcvclops, ~£Jch Df th~~ runoff
fr~.l this èrC'<'1 ti111 continuo to drain to the railroarl. õlthou{]h
the runoff which does coll{'!ct Jlong the Rufe SOD\4 curbs and
9utt~rrs ~11'1 he ccncentratad ðt Stardust Drive antJ Orchard
lt~ne for overlan;j discharge 'tot!) the Sunnybrook {\dditian in
s(~n(;\~h¡j t 1 ~ rgl~r' q\Jant i t 1 €:s thB n prc!)entl y (\ xi st.
(.
.
.
.
~
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-[)allas
June 18, 1982
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
City of North R;chland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-218, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RUFE SNOW DRIVE, PHASE II, DRAINAGE
PROBLEM BETWEEN RAILROAD AND WATAUGA DRIVE
Enclosed are copies of' recent correspondence with the City Council and
Cecil Forester regarding the referenced problem. The existing drainage
problem is a serious one and future paving construction on Rufe Snow
could make the problem potentially worse. This situation is complicated
by the sensitive inter-city politics associated with this project, as
described in the attached correspondence.
Before we can complete the construction plans for this section we need
a definite directive from the City regarding this rnatter. We would
suggest that'a Council work session be held to discuss this problem.
We are prepared to meet wi th you and' if necessa ry wi th the Counci 1 at
your earliest convenience.
r~eanwhile, please call if you 'have any questions.
R~IA/l j c
Encl osu res
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
· , ~ b...:.-.. 1
~l.in~ .., 0!)1
. ". .JOJ..
. "...
'J
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/2.67-3367
Pa:'Je_ 3. C~c11 Forest~r. ~';;jrch 31. 1932
..
2. \Jhan the at·ca east of ~ufe Snow develop:;, th~ rail~oad cmpàny
rnay not pen11t the Devel(~pcr tø di~chl\rge increased runoff
quant'ties on the rð11r"oa1 r1ght:-of-'¡';3Y without pro~it!;!1'~
greater culvert capacity under the railroad and cth~r 1:}prov~
fncnts a 1 onrJ the ra i 1 road d1 ~,:h,~ r'9~ t;.h ..'t)t1.~l .
3. Future increased runoff disch~rges aloof.¡ the railroad r1ght-
of-wðy ;-li11 rèsult in the pot~ntial for 1ncreasf:d rlop!nstr~f\t'
flooding along the Calloway Rrarich Channel.
4. Future sit(~ filling af\d gradinç to bring tn.' propertJ ~~lst
of the r~ i 1 road above the pro})Qst:!d Rufe Snow eas t top of curb
gra~.1!} \-/i11 t--p:)st likel~y be requirt:.'d to avoid on-site flooding;
·ho~¡ev.er, s.uch eart~ ~/\)rk \-;111 resu1t iil 1ncreas~d f'ood;n~l
i!1 ~;!A ta~~9a .
.
Unles~ direct€td oth$r\'i1se, ~te will proce1?d ~!ith th~ rev1s~1 dosigf1
bdSe-d on overlÀrtd 5tQrr=i~tðtor d1scharg~ into \~i).taug~ as d;scus~~:l yesterday.
If ùfter ftJrth~r COtlsider~ation ðn alternative design is desired. we will
revlse our c.ostruction plans. dccord1J1~ly. r~ean~~h1143. please call if
.y'ûu have any ques t ions.
'f~
'T.~ 1 ~--. :--! :1- !") i' ~. .!6 f ;:" ·1 ': 0·...
,..... \,.'1,.\ ¡''\~~ ~ . f~_ å ~\ J I'. t. .
Ri1A/ljc
Encl QSU ,~·!S
cc: :··tr. ~~od çJ~ 4' ;"f. L i oe. C 1 ty f~·:1 !1~1g Q r
~r. Allen Bronstad. Director of Devclopnent
.
r:'_~J~~
,/~(;,{ '" I ~ I ~ (
- I":rtrj
~ s
J:." .. ~1"
O-'''f
a::
\
:c.
l-
e::
o
z
'\
,/
~o. RD. ;3022
A,
6. 0 ~c. . -
A-z.
(;,.O~~
A~
10. 74tÌc.,
Ac
4-,9 Zqe-.
A-~
\O.33G\6
w
... B- E~(;H
/Q , 'Nt ErS
.~
""
RICHLAND
HILLS
..
II
l
(
\
.~
JOB NO.
~
.
~
~'.~I MER
DHC.J t2G. WP.S 1/!L )
F <S ' l :
Octobor 29. 1?30
t{ooorab 1 e }14}yor and C1 ty Council
City of fiorth f{ich1sM "il1s
7301 ft. E. lo~p 82Q
!.torth R1chl~nd 'iil1s. Tax!s 7611~
.
3....J15, CITY or NORTH RIC!'!lA~~O HIllS.
"Rtf FE 5HO\J DR ¡'IE $TPrfT i,~iO flHÄI H.I\~E J
J~~1ÞR())ff}'~E~(TS I J 1 -
Pursuant to your instructions (c.t the pre-côtlnc11 ~eet1ng. i10nd.ay.
October 2·7. 1980. concern1nç our proposed off-!;ite stom sewer SY3t~:!!
in Stardust Dr1v~. ~ hitve ~dv1$~d \.Î~taug4ts Cit)1 Etl'J1nceriJtg Conçultßñt
that the Cit.y of Horth R1chlðnd lt111s wil' not fund th(~ construction of
an off..s1'te sto~ drafn in Watauqa unl"ss the \fataUqð City Council
agr~@s to pðSS a roso 1 ~'tion ð 11 o~1ng No.-t't Richl~nd ~ lJi 11 s,.. to a$Sê~S
Witt.auga prc~rty owner,. who T'ro"t on Rufe $now. for curb and ~lftter.
paving lirtd storm drain costs in 6ccordðnC(! 'd1th ~J.orth nich1nnd Hil1~
aS$e$s~"t po'1c1~s. Uê understand that this infornat1oA has ~~en ~as5ed
onto UðtÇifJ9i1f$ City Staff. M~ ftlrth.er understand that 1'~ata(jgðls C1ty
^ttorn~y wit1 be It' contact witb your City ·l-'ttorn~.tY concerning thi$
matter.
5.ubJ!:ct:
.
In respons~ to your qu~stions r~is~d conc~r"1"9 the drainage review
procedurcs e~ployed in connectton with the Sunnybronk, Addition to
Wat:aug£!. we havQ le!rned that thè City -of Þlstl1u!Ja ",-,os not have ~ COi~-
pre~en$1ve årainag9 r~licy which would ~andate th~ use of und0rgroo~~
storn sewers to dischargë stornwðt~r 9cnerðt~ fr~' cff-~1t~ drainage
areas. For this .reason. th~ developers of the -SunnybYon~ Addition W~~~
not required by ordinanco to take undQrgro-un1.th~ wat~r ç~nerat~ a~'t
of R;jfe Snow~hfèh discharges tlC'5t fro:1 North ~1ch1and Hills onto
WatðutJ4 even though thlJir Ci ty Engineering Con·$u.l t~nt in h 15 r~vf!Jw
of th~ pl£nn1nq rec~endcd that unrle'rground storð s~wcr$ he constructed
in t;tardust ~nd Orchard. HowevQr', the tlorth ~1chland !fi11s Su~j1v1$ion
Ord1niJncc dDes require un~Jerçround syst~ desiij" 1ft this s'1tuatfon and
bðS~d on such po1içy ~te pr'occed~d in accordanC6 \~ith this design crit~r·;3\_.
If it is thct Council·s desire to eli~1n~tA tht' r)ropo$~<i urrt!t'rºrQtlot1
stOMm S~Mer syst~ between th~ St. louis Soutt~~~~t~rn R411roðd ð"d
Wat!tuga road then wt} would rec~~Jend thft CÙh$tr-uct.1on of concr~te
p!Jv~mel'1t on Ruf~ Snow at Starrlus t Drfv~ and Orchðro Or-iv~ to f1}Ove
the st(srtMatt1~ runoff C)verl/Jnd ðcross R~fQ SnQ\4. Other'~1$~ \-(ðt~r
will poc~ct ðt thG low point5 a10nq the ~~st gutt~r lfnc b~rl crcat~ ð
traffic haz~rd dur1n~ rainfall and l~ad to r~p1d deterioration of the
H(}~{~rã~)'~ ~~~yor', ..,Id Ci ty COtJnc:11. ~ctob~~r
~f1
'. .f t
.., r.. I
¡i. ~~ \
Pa~-' ?
asnha1t ~Œvenent. a~cau$e of th~ severe d~1et~~r1ùu~ ~ff~ct of ru~~~n~
w~t~r ov~r a~phalt p~v~~~~t. tÞ~ US~ of concr~t~ p5v~~~nt is n~c~~sôry
\/h~re mOVf;~~nt of ~~r~1nag~ 8.crO!;5 t11~ ;')tV,~r1't~nt surfl\ce Q~cur5.
. .
\·10 ~~~)uld point ~ut that t.t~e ute 0"; cr~ncr~tc pav~F~f:·~t acros~ thörouf;hf~r~s.
has br-rro ~~'~pl IJYé1 ðt other l(1c.~ tiún~ thr(~lt~thout ti1H C1 t}' of NfJrth ~'ich-
1 t,,,d 1i11' ~ ,,"!h~fieY~r th(~ cn!1S titJê t i Q~ of lHldr-r~"'nui1d $ tor;'·~ !lr:~·/er!;
Cnnt1!'r,. feä'S 1 ~~, Y bfi d(Jf'H': 4 nnè 5;j ch (?xa~!' 1 e i ~ t:l~ va 11 f~V ~\Jt tt:"r \'c rc~ ~
~UfÐ $ní1~ south of loop, 82D ~;f11ch ~1i'Sc~ar~il"tS t!n l!r~a w~;;t'~ of ~Uf{~ $no~J
eð~t t\cro~s the $~Y'(J(~t into tht1 S"n~1 Hûiç!'ts A·jf1i t ;Of'.
f5eC~JJ$~ of t.h~ extr~~ølv 'flat. ~tr~$:t qr3d~$: Qii :~~Jfc $nc~J.. ~~t\',!~·;!n the-
ra11roa.d and t¡.:Jatl}lH1ð ~oðd. ~:h;c:h \loula r~st,lt friþJ i.ì:1 ðli~;nr':f!nt ~(t~1:~nl~d
to cðrry $. tor..'11,-(tI tar runofr t1(:rn~ ~ the thorctlghfi~ t'~'\ fro~\ t~1~ (},ft s t t r,¡ the
tlèS t tide.' wtJ ~'ou 1 d $ttcj~Jft~ t tft~) t ~ fu 1 1 c(Jn~ f'C t(~ s t r~t1 t p;; V~~~'~õt !&tZ(:t 1 ~J1
b{~const~u'cted ~11thin this ·(tre~. Furthr:r¡:tor~~ 'YOtJ~l~a:J ~Ji$h t,) 1~¢\lo
ofr c·~~ fa' 1 l{H~~ i\'~n~ ~it.h the curh Stl~i q!}tt~lr a~ t~~ \'l~st ~i~1~ to
f!\t;il itilte· th1t; d~i\if!ð~~~. Th1~ \!.of.!1d firoviðê four {4} t1~~Qugh tr~ffic
1.:¡n;!!; w1t~ th~ C:'~nt;nlJous turn lan~ ~l tnin~t~!1 ;n thi~ ~~t:ti(}n until
the Wt)st side is co-;~~1etcr.j.
U~l ~$ß d1 r~c!:f:.d oth~~-li S~ 'l!~ \.J111 proceeti ~;/i th thf! rsav<::r~:,~nf: dc~ ign hased
on th~ t:ontrete s.treet s.ection fr!ŸÄ the railroi'1 to tJ~tau1'~ ~rivt: ;1~
d~scrih~d ð~OVê. If ynu hJ1Y.(t any tluêstfot1S conf:ftrt'in~ î!!1Y ,~5p.~Ct of this
rrojcet, pla~se da nQt hasft~te to ca'l.
J'-....AI.' ~
.......... If- ¿ ... 1 t h.4-
;? I CHAftD 1--f. ~~Ln!:-i. ~.. E.
l1~t~/l.jc
cc : }~r. C~~ rl t2S W. ~11111 i1~1$, Ci t.y ~~3nc!~~r
r.;tr.. ", 1 en Frons t èJd. 11i rec tor of JJt i 11 ties
~:r... l~'.~~" 7·~.uder!t.. r~1rectQr of' ?ub1"1c ~~o'rks
~r. t~x ~~rnt1re. City Attorney
-\¿
\
.
., I,
.
, . .
. '
. ,
. '
---
,.¡...
City of ~orth 1{ichIand Hills··..:.....:.:...........:.
Star of the ~etroplex
'ClItrfifitnfe nf ~erltite
THE STATE OF TEXAS
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TO:
WANDA CAL flEET
IN RECOGNITION OF
PTVl?
YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE
. . .. .. ~. 4. .
. . ,
II
TO THE CITY IN THE
P~ANNTN~'ANn ~ONTNa
DEP ARTMENT.
DATED AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THIS 12th
DAY OF
JULY. 1982
Mayor
City Manager
Department Head
DATE: July 8, 1982
SUBJECT: Appointment to NRH Community Cable Advisory Panel
DEPARTMENT: Administration
BACKGROUND: Mr. Ray Fulenwider, Minister of Involvement at the Richland Hills
Church of Christ,has been recommended to serve on the NRH Community
Cable Advisory Panel for the 1982-84 term to replace Dr. Hal Brooks
who has resigned.
i
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED: Approve aorointnent/Disanrove appointment
BUDGETED ITEM: YES NO s
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
62?_�1111
COMMUNITY CABLE ADVISORY PANEL.
PROFILE FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS
a. e Re LI Ut�W ,a<r
Address I (CC 1 r1:)1,l
r\,L 1
Em; lcyer L\s..\ \4A\ CL
,L,.L cF' C �... , �
Phone: Home I X 1 - 14 I ) 2 Office 2 s 1 - C 11 3
Wife' s Name C \ Anh
Children' s Name and Ages e4•" — .. = 13 ) x-,• • _ •-) ) t X , neck — c . 5/
Resident of the City since =.l 1 `\1 3
Previous Residence ki t-.I:Li c li Hk i 'c-` L1/42: •
1 i
Occupation
Do you own real property in North Richland Hills? Yes_ ✓ - ' No
Memberships, Organizations and Previous Experience on City Commission:
ti_ham C . A7 C�...,... ,t „S , t. , I R pre ): \ ,..\
C1t_l„ 4 a • �.t :�.1. . , AL, 14. 1; . l •
F IUL) Tx• , , I .
S• . l w:,f, 'w .: Lk, t , S, . itt , T. 2lr
.., �lti�.
Comment (About yourself, why you wish to serve, qualifications and other
pertinent information.`) \r y 1
\� 4c.k 1 =4) 11 .c �[ g Yl ti , 0.( 10)1 ,, \ �� 11 . ,1 I✓\F. Y=I1 .�4 t
1 .\ . C. .•I t. - 1Li h"1 ♦ 4. .rY( t. kA„ " .1 11 hbt.. . )/ fti l -Id. )
, �,.. , ) , t a !�'. � Y. S<o . „NH,- I n CC4.. .( "":r l 4,k
14 <.. , � , 4.......1, ll_v, a .,„ S'c ,. , l
._ 1 ..15 r .. , rcl. � �I 1. �. � • ' . : ..� c _ cl„kn'1 5 Li, tie 17 .
115 \,} s.. , ui r ‘ ,.. t1 AL `, - ?, .
y \t. . ,. . al ..l ._a N 111 .,r -c G. t•,-I It l.<va1 \,.,v, 1,,,., (., w.,.- -.� � ■-. �...,,t.\
W. AC O. t � 1). -A kk, C . 17 (-_.,.. O .,..\ T oti t„ i rt, f;a 1...� ..2 U.
City of ~orth ~ichland WlIs
I ¡ ;
~ ,/ ¡";
\''-.,./ ; ~.. ,of
~-=~~~*f:'~ ~tar of the ryetroplex
,.. ~ ¡ '\
.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PS 81-65
APPROV ED
PS 82-14
APPROV ED
. PS 82-16
APPROV ED
PS 82-17
APPROVED
.
;1
~
Rodger Line
City Manager
Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
Platting cases for City Council July 12, 1982
DATE: July 8, 1982
Request-of Nasser Shafipour for final
plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, Red Gate
Addition.
~.
Request of Burk Collins for replat of
Lots RI8 & RIg, Block 4, College Hill
Addition, 8th Filing.
!~ 'Reauest of John W. Barfield for
..\~rePlat of Lots 48A, 48B, 52A, & 52B,
~ Block 2, Stonybrooke Addition.
Request of John W. Barfield for
replat of Lots 5A & 5B, Block 1,
.Crestwood Estates Addi tion.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N. E. LOOP 320/ P- O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHlAND HIllS, TEXAS 76118
~
To see Maps with Agenda:
Please contact City
Secretary's Office /
Municipal Records
þ
.
.
.
DATE: July 8, 1982
SUBJECT: PS 81-65 Final Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, Red Gate Addition
DEPARTI~ŒNT: Planning & Zoning
BACKGROUND: This propertY_JL~ locat~d on the east side of Davis Blvd. and just south
of Mockingbird Lane.
All Engineer's comments have been met.. We have a signed covenant for pro rata for
. I
r curb & qutter.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this final pTat subject to
'the Engineer's comments.
~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQUIRED: Approval or denial of final plat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
NO X
YES
ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A
---------------------------------------------------------~~~ .~~
~-- ~-~~-~~-~~~~~-~-~~--~
t..
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
OATH OF OFFICE
".
(
(
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND. ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
JUNE 24, 1982 - 7:30 P. M.
~~
~/
~~
/.~
~
CONSIDERATIO F THE MINUTES
82
1 .
.
PS 81-65
PRESENT:
CHAIRMAN
SECRETARY
MEMBERS
~~/
~ ..
The meeting .was called to order by the
Chairman, George-Tucker, at 7:35 P. M
ALTERNATE
COUNCILMAN
COUNCILMAN
DIR. of DEVELOP T
P & Z COORDIN R
George T
Marjor· Nash
Don en
Ma~ Hannon
k Wood
ohn Schwinger
Richard Davis
. Dick Fisher
Allen Bronstad
Wanda Calvert
The Oath 0 Office was administered to
r~ark' Woo ?and John Schwinger: Itl, ,
do sol nly swear that I will faithfully
exec 'e the duties of the office of
Me~r of the Planning and Zoning Commission
r the City of North Richland Hills of th'e
~ tate of Texas, and will to the best of my
~ ability preserve, protect, and defend the
/ Constitution ,and Laws of the United States
. and of this State; and I furthermore
"0 sol emnly swear that I have not directly nor
indirectly paid, offered, or promised to
pay, contributed, nor promised to contribute
any money, or valuable thing, or promised
any public office or employment, as a reward
to secure my appointment or the confirmation
thereof. So help me God. II
Ms. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Bowen, to
approve the m~nutes as written.
This motion carried 4-0.
The Chairman welcomed new members Wood and
Schwinger. He said Mr. Schwinger is an
Alternate member who will sit on the Board,
but will only vote when one or more regular
members are not present.
_~.~ :A~ -:=..~,.-.l--::-~.!.. :-:... ~ ~ '!':. ~~:::-{-::'" :' =- ~.: ~...:..r. nï~' ... .:..c.' :î ~.... . ,,.... T
Request of Nasser Shafipour for final plat
of Block 3, Red Gate Addition.
Page 2
p & Z Minutes
June 24, 1982
(.
2.
I
\
PS 81-65
APPROVED
PS 82-3
'"
?"
/
/
/
PS 82-3
APPROVED
( .
Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer
at 3729 Flory Street) came forward to
r'epresent Mr. Shafi pour.
.
Mr. Stembridge said he had made all the
'nec'essary corrections 'as mentioned in
the City Engineerls comments.
Mrs. Nash moved to approve PS 81-65
subject to the engineer1s comments.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and
the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Four Seasons Nursing Center
Inc. for preliminary plat of Lot 7)
Block A) Calloway Farm Addition.
John Levitt) Engineer at 3721
came forward to represent F
Mr. Levitt said they su
request. last December .nd got
the problems worked ~t. He said they
have now resubmi . d the revised plans .
:and request ap val.
Mr. Hannon sked about item #2 of the City
Enginee~ letter regarding the flood .
hazard?~ea. He asked if Mr. Levitt had
an ineer's study made.
7'
.~ Levitt said he did not because there
~;rris an existing building on the property.
He said that Four Seasons plans to buy
more land later and add on to this building
and when they do, they will have to do a
drainage study.
. .
Mr. Bronstad 'said this property had never
been platted so when they came in for ð'
remodeling permit) we required them to plat..
He said in regard to item #4 about a fire
hydrant, they now have a sprinkler system
and when they come in for the addition) they
will be required to put in the fire hydrant.
Mr. Bowen moved to approve PS 82-3 subject
to the Engineer's comments.
Mr. Hannon said Mr. Bowen should amend his .
motion to waive #4 until such time that ther
~~~~.~_____._"±-__L~~'1~'~_____~_~_":'-:: T !4. z.:z. ~~ ~.' k t ~ J~'Ir
.
In
we
1 .
2 .
. 3.
4.
5 .
.
('
. Delbert R. Stembridge
consulting engineer
June 15, 1'982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop820
North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Block 3, RED GATE ADDN.,
Final Plat, PS 81-65.
response to Know1ton-English-Flowers letter dated June 14, 1982,
offer the following comments:
The Engineer's seal has been affixed to the final plat.
The metes and bounds description has been corrected.
The proposed 6-inch stub-out to serve Block 4 has been re-
located within the Irish Drive right-of-way.
The proposed 6-inch water line now shows to be looped to
the existing 8-inch lirie in Mockingbird Lane.
The "future" 8-inch sanitary sewer line along the west line
of Lot 1, Block 3 has been_changed to show the proposed
extension to Mockingbird Lane and will be constructed along
with the other proposed sewer facilities.
6. & 7. Please refer to our response to these items which
appear in. our letter to the Planning and Zoning Commission
dated January 15, 1982.
If there should be any further questions regarding this plat,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
P.E.
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
3729 Flory. North Rlchland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-1363
.
.
.
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort vVorth-Dallas
June 14, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
. City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-952, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RED GATE AODN., BLOCK 3,
REVISED FINAL PLAT, PS 81-65, (GRID 105)
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following' comments:
1. The final plat should be affixed with a Surveyor's seal of registration
rather than Engineer's seal.
~.
2. A part of the bearing call in the north line of Block 3 is missing
in the metes and bounds description on the plat.
3. We would suggest that the proposed 6-inch water line stub-out to serve
Block 4 be located within the Irish Drive right-af-way to give City
personnel better access to the water meter when ~lock 4 develops.
4. We would further suggest that the proposed 6-inch water line along
the north TESCO right-af-way, which is shown to terminate at Irish
Drive~ be looped around the east end of Lot 2, Block 3, and tied into
the existing 8-inch line in Mockingbird Lane to provide better service
to the area and avoid a deadend 6-inch line.
5. You may wish to require the Developer to construct at this time the
"future" a-inch sanitary sewer main along the west line of Lot 1, Block
3, to Mockingbird Lane which will be required for future service to
Block 2~ to avoid possible future disruption of Lot 1 access to Davis
Blvd. created by construction of the 8-inch sanitary sewer.
6. We would refer you to our letter dated November 6, 1981, Irish Meadows
Addition, Lot 2, Block 8, PS 81-61, regarding our comments concerning
existing water line pro rata and TESCO permits.
7. We would also refer you to our comments ~ letter dated December 11, 1981,
Redgate Addition, Lot 1, Block 3, regarding Developer Covenant require-
ments for participation in future improvements on Davis Blvd.
12~, CùL-
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
550 FIRST ST ATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, tEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
.
.
.
(
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
. December 11, 1981
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-952, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RED GATE ADDITION~ BLOCKS 2, 3 AND 4,
PRELIMINARY PLANS, PS 81-64; AND
LOTS 1, BLOCK 3, FINAL PLANS,
PS 81-65, GRID 105
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. We would refer you to our comments by letter, dated
November 6, 1981, for Lot 1, Block 3, of this Addition
which was previously submitted by the Developer as Lot 2,
Block 8, of the Irish Meadows Addition, (PS 81-61).
2. In accordance with our recommendations in Item 1 of our
November 6, 1981 letter~ the Developer has submitted a
revised preliminary' plan for your consideration which
includes property north and south of his original sub-
mittal as well. We assume that this plan covers all of
Mr. Shafipour's holdings in this immediate area, however,
the ownership of Tract 17 south and contiguous with Block 4
has not been shown on the preliminary plat.
3. Pro rata for the existing 8-inch waterline in Davis Blvd.,
as noted in Item 2 of our November 6 letter, should also
include frontage in Mockingbird Lane, along Block 2 as well.
We would estimate pro rata ùt $5.50 per linear foot for a
length of 379.14 feet along Lot 1, Block 3, and 633.75 feet
along Block 2.
4. The Developer has not shown on the preliminary plan how he
proposes to provide water service to Block 4, nor has he
shown fire hydrant coverage for this block nor fire protection
for 810ck 2.
5. As noted in Item 3 of our November 6 letter, evidence of
written permission from TESCO for the proposed sanitary
sewer easement across the TESCO right-of-way should be
provided to the City.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021·817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
(
.
Page 2 -- December 11, 1981 -- Planning & Zoning Commission
6. Additional utility easements as required should be shown
on the preliminary plat for Block 4. The Developer should
contact the utility cOìllpanies for their requireìnents.
7. The Developer should be req~ired to signa covenant running
with the land agreeing to participate in future paving and
drainage improvements along Davis Blvd. in accordance with
the City's assessment policy. This would include frontage
on Lot 1, Block 3 and also along Block 2.
8. Written pennission from the Highway Dept. should be obtained
for any construction by the Developer in the Davis Blvd.
right-of-way.
9. We would note that although the Subdivision Ordinance re-
quires that these cOlnrnercial lots be served by a minimum .
8-inch sanitary sewer line, but the collectQrs which the
Developer is proposing to tie into are only 6-inch lines.
We would suggest that the Developer ba required to demonstrate
that these 6-inch lines have sufficient capacity to handle the
anticipated wastewater flow generated by these cormnercial lots.
If such required capacity is not available in the existing
6-inch collector lines, then the Developer may be required to
extend his sewer service lines to the nearest 8-inch collector
either across Davis Blvd. or down to Emerald Hills Way.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
Rt~A :mh
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
.
( (
'.
City of JX9rth Richland Hills, Texas
.
TO: Planning and Zoning CommissÌ'on
REF: PWM-0063-81
. FROM: Cecil Forester, Director Public Works/
Utilities
DATE: DecemberlO~' 1981
SUBJECT: Final Plat - Lot 1, Red Gate Addition
1. Reference sewer line location - in a letter I wrote to the
owners on 5-19-81, I indicated that sewer service would
have to come from the extension of an·8rt main near
Emerald Hills Way and Davis Blvd.· I will not permit
the connection in Irish Dr. A 10· sewer easement
will be necessary to extend this main along Davis Blvd.
.
~
2. Pro rata charges of $5.50 per linear foot for a distance
of 379.14 will be required on the existing 8" water main.
3. I would caution the owner against making a 1" water tap
at this time unless he knows specifically what development
will take place on the property. He may need more than
can be pravi ded wi th a one inch meter (50 GPM).,
.
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76118
.
.
.
(\
'"'
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-L)allas
November 6~ 1981
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-909, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
IRISH MEADOWS ADDITION, LOT 2, BLOCK 8,
PS 81-61, PRELIMINARY PLANS~ (GRID 105)
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer
the following comments:
1. Since the developer of this property, Nasser Shafipour, is shown
to own the contiguous property east of this proposed platting,
you may wish to see a preliminary layout of this offsite area as
well, in accordance with the provisions of Section 1-03, 0.13,
of the Subdivision Ordinance.
2. The developer should be required to pay his pro rata share of the
existing 8-inch water line in Davis Blvd. which will serve this
development. \lJe would estirnate pro rata at $5.50 per front foot
for a total length of 379.14 linear feet.
3. The developer is proposing to serve this lot with a sanitary sewer
line extension along, and apparently across (not shown), the TESCO
right-of-way. Written evidence of Permission from TESCO for this
sewer line extension across their right-af-way should be obtained.
4. Consideration should be given to requiring that the building line
, on Mockingbird Lane be increased from 15 to 25 feet to provide a
uniform setback from Davis Blvd. to Irish Drive.
5. Utility companies should be consulted regarding any additional
'easement requirements they may have for this lot.
'Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision,
please do not hesitate to call.
,..
UJ.~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester~ Director of Public Works
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
.
.
.
DATE: July 8, 1982-
SUBJECT:
PS 82-14 Replat of Lots RI8 & RIg, Block 4, College Hill Addition, 8th piling.
r
DEPAR~IENT: Planning & Zoning
BACKGROUND: Thi s DropertY_i~-19.cat~d àt the southeast corner of Abbott Avenu'e and
Colleqe Circle. There was one small lot and one large one. They just moved the
line to make the small one larger.
All Engineer's comments have been complied with and additional easements reqùested by
TESCO & Southwestern Bell Telephone Company have been added t'o plat.
The Planning'& Zoning"Commission recommended approval of this replat.·
. ~ ~.
CITY COUNCIL ACTIO~1 l~EQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
NO X
YES
N/A
~~~
~~~~--~~~~~~--~-~~-~---~---~-~~~~~~----~~~-~--~~-~---~~--~~-~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
June 24, 1982
(' .
(
.
is an addition
his motion
Thi s mati on was seconded by Mr. vIood and
the motion carried 5-0.
3.
PS 82-14
..
Request of Burk Collins for replat of
Lots RI8 & RIg, Block 4, College Hill
Addition, 8th Filing.
Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer,
came forward to represent Mr. Collins in
his request.
Mr. Stembridge said Mr. Collins owns two
lots, one small one and one real large one;
he w~nts to make the small lot larger.
Mr. Stembridge said TESCO had requested
additional easements and he had added them
to the plat. He said he had also complied
with the engineer's comments.
.
PS 82-14
APPROV ED
Mr. Hannon moved to approve PS 82-14. .
4.
PS 82-16
This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion carried 5-0.
'1~' Request of ~h'n V' Barfield for replat
Lots 48A, 48B, 52A, & 528, Block 2,
Stonybrooke Addition.
John Barfield came forw he
has some duplexes w· he has problems
financing. He it was hard to find
financing f a $130,000 unit, but you
could y get financing for $65,000 per
si Mr. Barfield said he could sell
emOby metes and bounds, but couldn1t ~
get financing without replatting.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor
of this replat to please come forward.
..~
~z~
JJ!!I/ij'Z.
Â~~
,,;.r ".oM! ~,I(,..,
There being no one wishing to speak in favor
of this replat, the Chairman called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to ple~se
come forward.
.......-
.
.
.
.
(
(
Delbert R. Stembridge
consulting engineer
June 16, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lots R18 & R19, Block 4,
COLLEGE HILL ADDN., 8th
Filing, Replat, PS 82-14.
In response to Knowlton-English-Flowers letter dated June 14, 1982,
we offer the following comments:
1. This item refers to a City Staff function.
2. The areas of lots R18 & R19 have been added to the plat.
If there should be any further questions regarding this plat, please
do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
ò
De
DRS/et
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
Mr. Cecil Forester, Director of Public Works
3729 Flory. North Rlchland Hills. 76118. (817) 284-1363
('
I'
\ -
(
.
~
,[:,
TEXAS.
ELECTRIC - SED' ¡ ICE
. COMPANY
June 15~ 1982
Ms. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Dept.
Ci·ty of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Ms. Calvert:
.
Texas Electric Service Company has reviewed again the proposed
replat of Lots R-18 and R-19, Block 4, College Hills Addition,
8th Filing~ to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and we
give permission to remove the previously requested utility
easement consisting of five (5) feet on each side of the common
lot line between Lots R-18 and R-19 of the above replat.
If we may be of further assistance, please call.
Yours truly,
·"~1 \
~r-----
J;
J. E. Simpson
JES:lfj
cc: R. L. Fain
.
<.)
/
t
\
(
.
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSUL Tlj'JG ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Oalras
June 14, 1982
Planning & Zoning Commission
City' of North Ri'chland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Ricfiland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-804, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
COlLEGE'HILL'ADDN~~'8TH FILING, LOTS
, RI8 AND RIg, BLOCK'4 ~ REPLAT ~
PS 82~14,tGRrDg6)
.
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and
offer the following comments:
1. All utility companies should be advised concerning this
replat in accordance with standard City procedures.
2. We would request that the areas of lots R-18 and R~19
be shown on the. rep 1 at.
Shpuld you have any questions concerning the review of this
subdivisi'on, please do not hesitate to call.
I/J~
RICHARD ti4! ALBIN, P.E.
Rt~A:bvg
cc: r1r. Rodger N.. Line, C;-ty Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
.
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
(
(
.
TEXAS
ELECTRIC
~
.::;'), ,
.'t:ù
SERVICE
COMPANY
June 7~ 1982
Ms. Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Dept.
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richl~nd Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Ms. Calvert:
.
Texas Electric Service Company has reviewed the proposed replat
of Lots RI8 & RIg, Blk. 4, College Hill Addn., 8th Filing, to the
City of North Richland Hills, Texas. .
Additional easements are requested as shown in red on attached
plat.
If we may be of further assistance, please call.
Yours truly~
~2
~~
J. E. Simpson
JES: 1 fj
Attachment
cc: R. L. Fain
.
-:
"1)
.~
~
~..~
\
\
\
\
...¡ \
~o ,
\
~ \ \
- \
~\ \
\
\
\
\
..... \
-.¡ \
-.¡ \(J\
\ -
\c:.
\...
\~
\(1\
, \(1\
, \3
\~
J{
,. .
.'
~
..
:--.;
( .
en
o
:Þ
r-
m
.
~
..
II
~
o
'"
i
¡
i
I
I
J
..I
I
()9) ,\0') ~
.-0 · '?'\ t \. ,.
.~O ,?0 .£0
~ n. 96
'Ò \-.J ,
'?'\') ~ 1
01,
·t
0"
.
..
'\
. . . . .. .
-. ..- -.
J>
r-
t-1 0
~ ...4
m
0-
,:0
-z. \
.,:1 .>
<.0
\\
-y~
<?
~ 0..>.
0.. ~ \
\ " !
\'(f\ 1) I
·0 }7;
.~ ~
-...I \
'I
.
\
\' :
)
.' I
'"
'~.:~:
~
i '
,
,,-
"-0
. ~ ..þ..
."~
.
(
,
\.
. City of JXðrth Richland Hills, Texas
RECEIVED
/IIAY 2 6 *82
¡'Ah'Af;tt
1io1r~!>J
May 25, 1982
Mr. ~~~~¥g~LAQ..~
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
408 First State Ba~k Bldg.
,B~~ford., TX 76,02.1'
Dear Sir:
.
,'Enclosed you will find a copy of a replat of
Lots.Rl8 & ~19~ Blk. 4, Colleg~Hill Addn., 8th Filing,
to be heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission
June 24, 1982:
Please forward written acknowledgemènt of all or
no objections of ttais replat.,
Sincerely, .
.Y~~
Wan'daCa 1 vert
Planning & Zoning Dept.
Encl.
SEE PUt1 rpl2-
51 u 1í¿/ re¡ efJSe/l7eN(
.
s()()rHWlß*r~ lS~
~ J M (\~ t t L,A- Q... t<::- · .
IqDI ~pef}( DR,
- B b-J) For¿D -r~ 7 (P OZ/
(817) 281.Q041 / 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 13305 / NORTH RtCHLAND HILLS. TEXAS 76118
.
.
.
DATE:
July 8,' 1982
SUBJECT: PS 82-16 Replat of Lots 48A~ 48B~ 52A, & 52B~ Block 2~ Stonybrooke Addition.
DEPAR~!ENT: PlanninQ and Zoning
~
¡,
BACKGROUND: This property. is locat~d on the East side of Davis Blyq. and sOijth of
Rumfield Road. There are already duplexes built on these lots. Mr. Barfield wants
to be able to sell each side of the duplexes to individual owners (Dual Ownership-
Ordinance #908).
There were no Engineer's comments to be corrected.
. The Planning' & Zoning Çommission recorrmended approval of this replat. .
CITY COUNCIL ACTION I~EQUIRED: Approval or denial of replat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NU}fBER: N/A
----------------------------------------------------------~~-(!~----
Page 3
p & Z Minutes
June 24) 1982
(
-
(
-
"~~M . ....,.;""'!"f~ . '. . ..(~.,
~
.
is an addition
Mr. Bowen said
as requested..
This motion was second
the motion carried 5
3.
PS 82-14
Request of Bur, ollins for replat of
Lots R18 & , Block 4, College Hill
Addition h Filing.
Del t Stembridge, Consulting Engineer,
e forward to represent Mr. Collins in
;Ç/'/'Y- is request.
~ Mr. Stembridge said Mr. Collins owns two
lots, one small one and one real large one;
he wants to make the small lot larger.
Mr. Stembridge said TESCO had requested
additional easements and he had added them
to the plat. He said he had also complied
with the engineer's comments.
.
PS 82-14
APPROVED
Mr. Hannon moved to approve PS 82-14. ,
This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion carried 5-0.
4.
PS 82-16
Request of John W. Barfield for replat of
Lots 48A, 48B, 52A, & 52B, Block 2,
Stonybrooke Addition.
John Barfield came forward. He stated he
has some duplexes which he has problems
financing. He said it was hard to find
financing for a $130,000 unit, but you
could easily get financing for $65,000 per
side. Mr. Barfield said he could sell
them "by metes and bounds, but coul dn I t
get financing without replatting.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and
called for those wishing to speak in favor
of this replat to please come forward.
.
There being no one Wishing to speak in favor
of this replat, the Chairman called for those
Wishing to speak in opposition to please
come forward.
Page 4 (
P & Z r,1inutes
June 24, 1982
~
PS 82-16
APPROV ED
G. Hagn~ 7209 Stonybrooke~ Jim Kemp~ 4IÞ
8404 Springbrook Ct., and P. Haffner,
7300 Stonybrooke, came forward.
Mr. Hagn said they wanted to see. where ,
these lots were located.
Mr. Tucker showed the location of the'
property and said there are duplexes
already built on these lots.
Mr. Barfield said he found there was a
market for single family attached.
Mr. Bowen asked if the three that came
forward.were still in opposition to this
request.
Mr. Hagn said there were not opposed to
this request.
The Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Hannon moved to approve PS 82-16.
This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion carried 5-0.
4IÞ
5.
PS 82-17
P' : í· '~T-~ ____~_..--
Request of John W. Barfield for repla
Lots SA & 58, Block 1, Crestwood E
John Barfield came forward. e said this
property is located on Court.
Mr. Barfield said ere had already been
two lots in t · 'court replatted. He said
in this du ~x zoning there are also some
single. 'ily homes.
· Barfield sPaid he has an interested party
,7 in this property.
Mr. Hannon asked if there was a structure on
this lot. He also asked about these two
lots not being the same size.
Mr. Barfield said the property in this court
is zoned for duplexes, but there have been
some single family homes built there. He
said there is no structure on this~ but he ~
plans to build a duplex on it for single ...
family attached.
·
·
·
,
/
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
June 14, 1982
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-858, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND·HILlS~
STONEYBROOK ADDN., LOTS 48A, 48B,
52A, & 52B, BLOCK 14, REPLAT,
PS 82-16, (GRID 61)
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and
offer the follo'lling comments:
~
1. All utility companies should be advised concerning this
replat in accordance with standard City procedures.
2. We would note that this replat splits lots 48 and 52-R
of Block 2 apparently for the purpose of dual-owner duplex
type dwelling construction. This reduction in lot widths
is permitted in 2F-9 zoning if construction is. in full
accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 908, dated
July' 13, 1981.
Should you have any questions concerning the review of th.is
subdivision, please do not hesitate to call.
RWA:bvg
cc: r-~r. Rodger N. L ìne, City Managet
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021· 817/283-6211· METRO/267-3367
..
DATE:
July 8, 1982
SUBJECT:
PS 82-17 Replat of Lots 5A & 58, Block 1, Crestwood Estates Addition
.
DEPAR~ŒNT: Planning and Zoning
BACKGROUND: This property~~cat~d on the South side of Elm Coùrt, approximately
350 feet west of Davis Blvd.
r
Mr. Barfield wishes to build a duplex on this lot and be able tq sell each side to '
a different owner "(Dual Ownership; ·Ordinance #908).
There were no Engineer's comments to be corrected.
~ ~,
The Planning and Zo"ning Commission reconmended approval of this replat.
.
CITY COUNCIL ACTIO~1 ItEQUIRED:
Approval or denial of replat.
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOt}1~T NilltBER: Nj A
------------------------------------- ~~ ~~
-~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~-~~--~~-~-~~~~~~~~~--~~~--
.
Page 4
p & Z Minutes
June 24~ 1982
(
(
.
G. Hagn~ 7209 Stonybrooke~ Jim Kemp~
8404 Springbrook Ct.~ and P. Haffne
7300 Stonybrooke~ came forward.
'.
Mr. Hagn said they wanted
these lots were Jocate
Mr. Tucker showe ,
property and
already bu·
e location of the
there are duplexes
these lots.
he found there was a
family attached.
Mr. Bowen asked if the three that came
forward .were still in opposition to this
request.
PS 82-16
APPROV ED
Mr. Hagn said there were not opposed to
this request.
The Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Hannon moved to approve PS 82-16.
This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion carried 5-0.
5.
PS 82-17
Request of John W. Barfield for replat of
Lots 5A & 5B~ Block 1~ Crestwood Estates.
John Barfield came forward. He said this
property is located on Elm Court.
Mr. Barfield said there had already been
two lots in this court replatted. He said
in this duplex zoning there are also some
single family homes.
Mr. B'arfield s·aid he has an interested party
in this property.
Mr. Hannon asked if there was a structure on
this lot. He also asked about these two
lots not being the same size.
.
Mr. Barfield said the property in this court
is zoned for duplexes~ but there have been
some single family homes built there. He
said there is no structure on this, but he
plans to build a duplex on it for single
family attached.
Page 5
p & Z Minutes
June 24, 1982
(
(
PS 82-17~
APPROVED
6.
PZ 82-14
(
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing 4IÞ
and called for those wishing to speak in
favor of this replat or just for information
to please come forward.
Kim Cowan, 8204 Timberlane Court, came
forward and asked if approval had been
given to build a duplex on this lot.
Mr. Tucker said it is zoned for duplexes
and they can build a duplex on this lot.
The Chairman called for those wishing to
speak in opposition to this replat to
please come forward.
There being no· one wishing to speak, the
Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Bowen moved to approve PS 82-17.
This mati'on was seconded by Mr. Wood and
the motion carried 5-0.
Request of Gulf Oil Corp. to rezone Blo
4, Snow Heights North Addition, from · 4IÞ
present classification of Local R 1 to
a proposed classification of L Retail-
Specific Use~Sale of Beer f off-premise
consumption.
This property is loca the northeast
corner of N.E. Loo 20 Rufe Snow Dr.
Steven Gins g, Attorney at 1930 Commerce
Bldg., F, ~orth, came forward to represent
Gulf .. Corp. He said he was here along
wi representatives of Gulf Oil and Majik
rkets to request this zoning change from
~ Local Retail to Local Retail-Specific Use-
so that beer may be sold for off-premise
consumption.
Mr. Ginsberg said while Gulf has developed
the property to sell gas and petroleum
related products, Gulf also has had the
public convenience in mind and tries to meet
the demand for non-petroleum products at
its sites. He said at many of Gulf's
outlets in the Metroplex a grocery-related
product mix is sold including bread, milk,
g~oceries, cig_a_rett:.? and othe~ sundries. .
.
.
.
,
<.
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC'
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort \,yorth-Dallas
June 14, 1982
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-871, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
CRESTWOOD ESTATES, LOTS 5A AND 58,
BLOCK 1, REPLAT, PS 82-17, (GRID 61)
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and
offer the following comments:
1. All utility companies should be advised concerning this
replat in accordance with standard City procedures.
2. We would note that this replat splits lot 5 into two lots
apparently for the purpose of dual-owner duplex
type dwelling construction. This reduction in lot widths
is permitted in 2F-9 zoning if construction is in full
accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 908, dated
July 13, 1981.
Should you have any questions co~cerning the review of t~is
subdivision, please do not hesitate to call.
"
RWA:bvg
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Director of Development
550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · a17/2e3~6211· METRO/267-3367
.
.
.
DATE:
July 12, 1982
SUBJECT:
Ordinance - Texas Electric Fuel Adjustment
DEP .c'\.RThlENT:
Administration
BACKGROUND:
City Attorne~_~ill_mak.e-prp~pn~~~;nn
¡.
~
~
CITY COUNCIL ACTIO}1 l~EQlrIRED:
Approve/Disapprove
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO
J\CCOt[NT tIDMBER:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDINANCE NUMBER
.
AN ORDINANCE REVISING THE FUEL ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE OF TEXAS ELECTRIC
SERVICE COMPANY IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR SUCH FUEL ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE RATE SCHEDULE,
AND PROVIDING CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH SUCH FUEL ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE RATE
SCHEDULE MAY BE CHANGED, MODIFIED, AMENDED OR WITHDRAWN.
WHEREAS, on December 4, 1981, the District Court of Travis County, Texas,
200th Judicial District, entered a final judgment in favor of various cities and
cooperatives served by Texas Electric Service Company (nTESCO") and adverse to
TESCO, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein
for all purposes; and
WHEREAS, the District Court in said judgment ruled (1) that TESCO rate-
payers had been overcharged approximately $30 million as a result of a preferential
sale of electricity by TESCO to TP&L and that a remedy was required for TESCO rate-
payers and (2) that the fuel adjustment clause used by TESCO and authorized by the
Public utility Commission of Texas does not meet the requirements of law; and
WHEREAS, the city hereby agrees not to seek any further remedy with regard
to the Martin Lake trartsaction found in violation of Section 4l(c) (1) of PURA, but in
all other respects, the City finds that the judgment and all included findings and
conclusions of the District Court shall be complied with in all regards, and said
judgment is hereby adopted and approved; and
.
WHEREAS, TESCO did, on December 9, 1981, file a proposed fuel cost factor
tariff for service within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas ("City") to become
effective January 13, 1982, the operation of which was denied; 'and
WHEREAS, the City, having considered the attached proposed modified fuel
adjustment clause and procedure for approval of payments to affiliates finds that
the modified fuel adjustment clause and procedure for approval of payment of affili-
ates should be approved and const~ued in accordance with the attached final judgment
of the District Court;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas:
SECTION 1: That the fuel adjustment clause rate schedule of Texas Electric
Service Company is hereby amended in accordance with Ex;hibit liB", attached hereto and
incorporated herein for all purposes. Such fuel adjustment clause is the one under
which TESCO shall be authorized to collect charges from its customers for the sale
of electric power and energy within the corporate limits of the City until such time
as said fuel adjustment clause rate schedule Inay be changed, modified, amended, or
withdrawn, with the approval of the City Council.
SECTION 2: Such fuel adjustment clause rate schedule, as same may be modi-
fied or amended, shall be effective from and after final passage of this ordinance
and shall apply to all power and energy used by each customer after the final passage
of this ordinance.
.
SECTION 3: That the action of the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills enacting this ordinance constitutes, on the date of its final passage, a final
determination of the fuel adjustment clause rate of Texas Electric Service Company
within the City of North Richland Hills in accordance with Section 43(e) of the Public
Utility Regulatory Act.
SECTION 4: That the final judgment of the District Court of Travis County, 4IÞ
Texas, 200th Judicial District, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved and
adopted except to the extent that the City has agreed not to seek any further remedy
with regard to the Martin Lake transaction found in violation of Section 4l(c) (1) of
the Public Utility Regulatory Act by said judgment. The attached modified fuel adjust-
ment clause and procedure for approval of payments to affiliates shall be construed in
accordance with said final judgment.
SECTION 5: Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed now or hereafter as
limiting or modifying, in any manner, the right or power of the City under the law to
regulate the rates and charges of Texas Electric Service Company.
SECTION 6: The rule providing for the reading of an ordinance of three
separate days is hereby suspended and this ordinance shall become effective as provided
by the Charter of the City of North Richland Hills.
PASSED AND APPROVED at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of North Richland.Hills, Texas, this 12th day of July, 1982.
Dick Faram - Mayor
4IÞ
ATTEsrr:
Jeanette Moore, City Secretary
4IÞ
.
.
.
DATE:
July 12. 1982
SUBJECT:
Resolution
DEPARTIIENT:
t\,dministration
BACKGROUND: This resoluttoIL~pends Lone Star Gas Co~pany's request for
rate increase request for 120 days. City Attorney will present.
¡.
~ ':0-.
CITY COUNCIL ACTIO}1 I~EQlrIRED:
BUDGETED ITEM:
I\.CCOtJNT Nill1BER:
YES
NO
~~~~-~-~~~~~-------~-~---------~-~~-~-~~~~-~~----~--~~~--~-~-~-~~~~~-~~--~---~~~~~~---
.
.
,.
.,.
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, Lone Star Gas Company filed a Statement of Intent to
change rates charged for gas [on......-J.Hlj 24,' 19ðL; ~- _-A-_ cfJ..~ ~ .' ~Î
. ' ~ f/"t~ .~~ () I .
WHEREAS, the City C~ needs time to study such_ statement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
The schedule of rates filed with the City by Lone Star Gas
Company on June 24, 1982 be and is hereby suspended for one hundred
twenty (120) days from , 1982, the proposed rate
effective date.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day. of July, 1982.
~.
Dick Faram, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanett'e Moore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM·AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
.
.
.'
.
/
í
DATE:
7-8-82
SUBJECT: Partial Pay Estimate #8 - Rufe Snow Drive Phase I
DEPARTMENT: Pu b 1 i c l~orks
BACKGROUND: Austin Road is requesti~g payment for \'/ork completed as of 6-30-82.
Total Contract Price
Work, Completed To-date
Less 5% Retainage
Di fference'
$831,770.71
$666,036.29
$ 33,301.81
'$632,734.48
Less Previous Payments
Less 'Paid to J.D. Griffith
$600,438.99
- $ 1, 747 . 14
$ 30,548.35
Due This Estimate
The approval of thi~ estimate is for work completed, not for extension
of time on the contract. For the extension of time requested, \~e will
need more information from Austin Road before we can make a recommendation.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION I~EQlrIRED:
Approval of pay estimate in the amoµot of $30~54n 3S
BUDGETED ITE1:
x
YES
NO
ACCOUtìT Nill,tßER;
Rufe Sno\~ Bonds__
---------------------------~-
..... - ...-....... -- - -- -...........~....- - -.... -..... --- - - ~ - - - --..... ............- .....-- -- ..... --- -
( ,
·
·
·
KNOWL TON-EN~-'SH-FL.WERS, IN~
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
July 6, 1982
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-315, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
RUFE SNOW 'DRIVE, PHASE, I,
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.8
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.8, dated
July 6, 1982, made payable to Austin Road Company in the amount of
$32,295.49, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced
project as of June 30, 1982.
The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site
by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
We recommend that this payment in amount of $32,295.49, be made to
Austin Road Co. at P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113.
Please note that this estimate also includes a request for partial payment
of emergency extra work ordered for the Chapman Drive culvert widening~
as required to help alleviate flooding, in the amount of $2~693.45.
Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a
blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate.
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ljc
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG. · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021. 617/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
-. .,."-.~
~.. ~
C 0 f'i T RAe TOR . t' S
E.' S T I :·1 A' T E
~ ,... 1''''-'''' ,
P 1 OF
- . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -, ----..-F.I LE._.-f33
-E~T-I ~ÀTE- -~,~o. - g ----- ---------- -----j08 -'-:~O-~=----3-=3-15---------------'
P~OJECT.DESCRIPTIO~- ST.& DRArN.r~PROV.ON RUFE SNOW DR. IH820 TO INDUS. PK BLVD
O~'JNER-~--NOR T H-RI-C H LAND-HI LI,..S------ _a - P LAC E- ---NOR T r.L_R r CH LAN D HI L LS, T X DA T E ~____ __._ __.___
TIM~ CHARGED THRU PERIOD- DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY
F.;\1ATERIALS FURNISHED AtxD LABOR PERFORt";ED IN PERIOD ENDING- June 30,1982
~.¡ OR D F: R.-DATE-~lO 112 1-81---a_ C Al EN DAR D A YS,:::,--- 355___.. . __ C m'lP LET I ON DA T E ~. 10 I_I I!
------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
PREVIOUS THIS U~IT
NO .-----1 T e'LD ESCR-I PT-I ON~_--_H ---------UN LL-ES II MA TE --EST I MA T E__ --TO T AL--______PR ICE _ ..AMOUN T
- -le--UNCL.--ST-R E E-L-EXCA VAT-ION----C._'L2 0894.600---__.2 »000 _. ----22t894. 6------_-1. 53----35 »028.
2. SUBGRADE STAB. t..¡/LP-IE SLURRY S.Y 35185.000 35»185 0.80 28»148.
3. LJr.~E FOR STAB. SUB GRADE TON 531.00 531 77.00 40»887.
4 ..- SA~rJ CUT S-FOR. .REr·'10V AL- OF---- - _.. _._ _ ____.'. __ _..______._______.___._.__..__
EXIST. C01\IC. & ASPH. L.F. 205.00 205 0.70 143.
5. RE\.10VE EXIST. CURB & GUTTER l.F. 0.00 140 140 2.25 315.
6 · - - (ON S-T R U CL6--!-.!-C U RB-&-IB--'.J___ --- ----------"--- -- ___ ------------------------___.____u_ -__uuu_______
GUTTER, INC. REINF. STL L.F. 6687.00 305 6»992 4.23 29»576.
7. 4"THK (L.B 2000 PSI CONCa
FOR ~\': E D I AN S - & - tv: I S C. USE S - S . F . _. _ 0 . 0 0... _ __ _ . __ ... ____ __ __
8. 5' t T H K C 0 ;~J c. D R '.~! Y S . S . F . 0 . 0 0
9. 6' t T ri K CON C. V ALL E Y 5 S . F . 1 2 9 8 . 0 0
·1 0 .---~/tC - 3 O--OR·.. E·A-~.~-'J~t~S_2R-I-;V~E-C OA.r-------.--_____
I~CL. SANDI~G ~ S.V 45395.000
11. RC-2 OR EA-HVRS ASPH. TACK
------ ---- CO AT ----- --------- ------------------ .. ·S . y--- 60000 . 0 00- - _u -_____ u_ 60» 000_____:_ _ o. 05___ - 3» 000. ~
12. T Y . A H ,'I. A C, 2 t t T HIe K
CO~-~PACTED 1:\1 1 COURSE S.Y 81200.000 81»200 2.60 211»120.(
.- i.~~: g-~~~~-,~~E~~.~~~~-2~~;7~~-~;~-·-----32~:-g-~-----·-35i~-6-3673: 60 ---i~: ¿;--i-6~-840-~(
15 .____TY_·_~D~;~~~ ¿o~~i~~c+7 ¿~~u~~~ s. Y -11200. QOO u______h_~ -7 -~I.JõO~ 2. 34___u~~
16. ADJ. WATER VALVE BOXES TO
FI~. STREET GRADE EACH 16.00 3
1-7. ..-.LYJ~-E--.l_l~.Ah~.A__REF_L EC.I-ORI.LED.____._____.._____ .____... .__________. ._____________
TRAFFIC MARKERS EACH 0.00
18. TYPE 1-( REFLECTORIZED
~u_________ I P. A FF I C}~A RK ER. 5 - ---_________E ACJJ________ 0 .uOQ_~__ ---------------_________2_~3_a __ _______ _ ___ _I!
19. YELLOW TRAFFIC BUTTONS
(NON-REFLECTORIZED) EACH 0.00 1.58
-__2.Q...uJHl.I.E___TB ~ EF_I_C_B_LLLLQtLS_~_________._.__________._____
- ------.... --- -~---- _..__ ._0 ______________....____
CNON-REFLECTORIZED) EACH 0.00 1.56
21. lS"DIP,. CL. III RCP L.F. 1097.00 54 1»151 16.00 18»416.
22 · ---21_'--~ D I !I .nC L ·___1 IJ - -.Rce...._______ ___La E.. ____ nn 291..:Q 0------------------_1~L__1.7_! 0 9___4»94?
23. 241 'DIA. CL. I I I RCP L.F. 349.00 349 18.60 -6»491.
24. 27' 'DIA. CL. I I I RCP l.F. 114.28 114.28 20.50 2»342.
2 5 · - - 3.3 _I_! - D 1 A · - - C L · -- I LL R C P -- --- - n___ - __u __ L. E... --_54 8_ .__00____________________ _ _54 ª________2 5 ._0_0__ 13 » 7 00 .
26. 36' 'DrA. CL. I I I RCP L.F. 126S.00 1»268 30.40 --38»547~
2 7. 4 8 ' 'D I A.. C LOll r I R C Pl. F . 825 . O:J 825 43 . 90 36» 217 .
2 8 · -- 5 4' 'D r A · C L · - U I R C P - _ __ l . F . __ _1 0 92. 0 0 _ __ ___ ________ _ J._» _09 2n 6 8 . 2 0 _ _ J 4 . 474 .
29. 5' STD. CURB INLET EA.CH 0.00 1 1 1050.00 1»050.
30. 10' ST). CU~g INLET EACH 0.00 2 2 1410.00 2»820.
3 1. 1 5! S T [). CUR g I I\! L EL__ --- __ un u _ __ E A C H 3 . 0 Ou_ 3_ 6_ 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 12 » 6 0 0 .
3.20' STD. CURB INLET EACH 0.00 1 1 2600.00 -i»600.
1,258
. 2,556
1.91
2.93
3.05
7 , 795. I
--- - .-." --. -----_._----_.._...._--~_..---
45.~ 395
0-28
12,710.~
19
125.00
2,375.(
---------. --. ...-..------.------------
2.90
-- .'-----------.----. -- ---------.. -- ..--
-- -~ ...--....-..-. _.- .~.-..- - -.---. -- - --~---._--~--- -----.--.- --.-.
---..------...-...---- ----.-. ---..-
-..-.. -..._~ ._- ..--...-----
-- -¡----- .-..- .-.-------. -_._---_..~_.-.-
- - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-------- ---- -. .--.------. ----.----. ---------------.-.------. --..- - ----.-.- ...:....
. _. -.------ ----------------------E.1 L E. F 3
ESTIMATE NO.- JOB NO.- 3-315
FROJECT DESCRIPJION-_ST.& DRAIN. If.1PROV.ON RUFE_SNO'tl DR. IH820 TO INDUS.PK BLVD
OWN~R- NORTH RICHLAND HIllS PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TX DATE-
TIME CHARGED THRU PERIOD- DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY
. ,.ï/~~~~~~ A~;i~~Ri~;7~~-8iND--LABO¿Är-~~6~~:I~;y-~~--P;~JOD END I~g;/ë~-i~~J:~~_-l 0) - 1
- - - - m_ ------------ ----- ------- _ -- -- _._ _ ___ _ __ _ _____ PRE V I 0 ~-~.__u TJj I ~ _ __ _ _ _ 'n_._ _________._ _ _ _h UN I T
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE
NO.
------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------.
. --~
AMOUN'
- -- _mo' ---- - ------------______________ __ ______ _nn_____________ ___ __ _.n____________ _______. __ _ ______ ___ ___ ___ _ _._ _ ______
33. IO'STAGE I (HAL F) INLET. INCL.
TIMBER COVER EACH
i 34.20'STAGE__ L-CHALFUNLEItINCL. ____
TIMBER (OVER EACH
35. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT
-- ..---- STA. 11+.11____________________ L~-S-·--------l-!~Ç----_____________________L_____X~?O'9Q_ ____ 1_,L2.9
3 6. S TOR ~1 0 R f'\ I ; \ V .{. U L.. T /Á. T
~ ---'._.~.- ._.._._~~--- -..- -- ~.-
9.00
9
800.00
7,20C
._~..._- .-.-- .- - -. --..---..-- ··----__4__._~__~,_
5.00
5
- --..------ -~~.- -_·_·__·....ø. _..._ .__ ~
1500..00
7,500
S TJ.. . 1 5 ... 7 1
L.S.
1.00'
1
1720.00
1,720
- '3.7 · S TO -.-:; ~L D S»J j J N -- VAU L 1_ _A T_ --- -- _ _ _ . . _ _ __ ________ n_ _ ..... n -----h_n__ ______ _ _ _ _ _ ______ _ _____ _ _ _
STA.23+50 l.S. 1.00 1 1720,00 1,7201
38. STOR~ DRAIN VAULT AT
- . ---n___u __uS TA·__2 6 ±.3 2 ------.------__ __L _~_S _,______ _1_. _0_0________ ______ -J---_l1.~_º_~_Qº___! ,~? ~º
39. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT
S T A , 35+ 7 3 ;. L . S · 1 . 00 1 1720 .0:) 1, 720
40,S T.oRM..__DRA I N_V AULL_AJ_ ---- ------ . - -------_____ __ _____ ----_u________.__. ______ _____ ____.__.__ _u_
S T A · 2 9 + 5 5 (t, A I , ) L · S · 1 . 00 1 32 8 0 . 00 3 , 280
41. STORM DRAIN VAULT AT
u_ -- ----- SJ A._ 3_V:.8_0__ tl_..!..A-'_! .1__ -- ----____ L 'S !__. _ __ __l.!Q_º_ . _________ -----------L____2_5_Q.D_ . OQ____ __ __ 2 , ~ ºº
4' COI',JC. ENCASEr~EI~T FOR h/A TER
LINESt INCL. REINF. STL (.Y. 0.00 78.00
4 L. f LEX 1.8 L E. BAS E t___CRU SH ED ..S TON E__ - - -_______________ ____________ ____ _. -u_ _____________ __ _.___. ___ _ __________
FOR PAVEMENT REPlACE~ENT C,Y. 0.00 19.90
44. TRAFFIC RESIG. AT RUFE SNQW
-------DR .---&___1 1-!.8 20__J\¡ · ..S ERV'__RD --_L. S · -----__ -_Qu. O_O________~_ _ _ .. ..-----_____2_~_5º_. 0_9__ -----__h__ . __
45. C.O. NO. 1.- 27X43 CG~"1 P AR l.F. 60,00 60 71.93 4,315
46. C.O. NO.2 PULL BOXES EACH 0.00 118.10
47. C, O. NO._ 2_ 3--'-' PVc. CON DJlLLn__ L .f_. 354. QO________________ _ _ ---J5.-4__'-____4_,.;-O___ 1 ,5~:?
c.o. #3 As per Richard Albin:
Extra work installing storm drain
-----@-Chappin_&uHue t L_____________________ _~_ _____________ _ _______ _ _ __________ ___ ___
4 men 12 Hrs Ea = 48 Hrs Hrs. 48 48 10.93 524.64
1 Backhoe Hrs. 12 12 29.35 352.20
-- L Loader no_ --..-·--------------__n. -- Hrs .___ _ :__12____ ______12__________ 40. 8)________489. 96
1 Dump Truck Hrs. 12 12 25.88 310.56
1 Compressor & Hammer Hrs. 16 16 4.45 71.20
-- --- C ru she d S ton e._u__ ---- _n ------ - -0- - - . - - ---- Ton - - oo -----__ _____ _ ----_5 3. _62_____ _oo_ 53 . 6 2 1.1_ ._O} ___.3_9} ~? L
15% Overhead 351.32
- .. '--~ -~~-----._----
-, -" - --.... --._-~-_..._.. --.--
~ ---..-.... -- .--...----..---- ..~, -'-~
--.-- -. ---' ...-..--.----.. ---.-----
. .- -... ~.._- ..._._-_._---~-_.._------------....--.._---_.....~_..- ..----.--
- ..- ..--- _._w ....__...__._.._.__...~.__
_r. _._...______.
-_.- ---- ----.---.----__ ._..._ø.._.. __ __.____
..- ---~.---_. .-..----~ __n~_.
-- ........ -.- -- . - -. _ø_., .. ......_____ _.__ ___ _ ... "'. _
.
-.. .-. -~--...- -..-... ...- .-.-. ..- -
-.. _. .. -. '"'--- -- ...
._._---~.. - ._-. _. -"--..
-- -.~----,-_.. -. ~---._- ___ø________
--...-.--.. ....-.. - ..-... -_. ---..-------..--
'-... . ....... ........ - ~.,-...
.. .... ... ~~ ~ '~
CON T RAe TOR. t S
ES ï I ,\~ ATE
P 3 OF
...--.-.--F I L E F 3 3
~. - .-... - ~ '-'-- ._- -.--
~ .
- ~ ~ - - - ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ .
.--.-----------------.------.-----. .-------.----..--.- ---.-..- ....---.--.-..-.----. .-....- ...----- -.--...-.---------.-
ESTI~ATf. NO.- JOB NO.- 3-315
PRO.JEC T DESCR IPT!ON~..S t. &.-DRA IN. g..IPROV. ON. RUFEuSNmoJ . ~)R. I H8 2 O. TO.Il~DUS. PK8 L VD
OWNER- NORTH RICHLAND HILLs PLACE- NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TX DATE-
T.~ CHARGED THRU PERIOD- DAYS CONTRACTOR- AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY
F t~A T ERr ALS FURN.ISHE D AND-.LABOR PERFOR~~E DI NnPER 100 END I NG- . June 30, 1982._
'WORK ORDER DATE- 10/12/81 CALENDAR DAYS- 355 COMPLETION DATE- 10/ 1/¡
---_.~ '. '"'-_., . -. --...--..-- -------.. ._--...._-~-----------_._--_.._-- -..-
-.--..-... ..-. --... P R E.V-I·O US -'-. .--T HIS ------.-.---..__.......________..._ ____... _ UN IT.
UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE
--".- -- ---.--. . -~- -- .... --
NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION
Ar"~OUN T
------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
. ...--- -.--------.------.------ -.----- --.---------..-. ------------ . - - ._-
._.. _. - -'-. -.---- -_. --.-------.-. -'---- ...-----.- --..- . - . -. ....- _. --.-- '-." - --.. -'--.--..- --'-.---. - ..- .... -- ---_.. .-..- -.. -
- ....-~ ~- ..-.....- ... _.~
-~ ... - ".._~-_._-
.. -..--- -. _.. ._-~.._--_._.__..._---_.- ---..-----. ---------..-----.---------.----------.- ..- -.-...- ...--.----.-----.----
--.--.... -...- ~......._-- - ..._~... ------..-. -~----_....._-.._-'--~-----_._-
FIELD VERIFICATION OF ~OB CONDITIONS
A ~.! D -- C 0 ~'J F- I R f"~ A T I 0 pj 0 F.- P.A Y--_. 0 U A {\J TIT I E S
'RY- .;:J~ ~~d f/lJÇ&//U
.._---_-:-_~~:~~ ~--- _-.-.:::.':~_::...":"_~~~~.':::::~~ -..
(OWNER'S PROJECT "REPRESENTATIVE)
D A_~_~#~Ä tt ~ -:~_:::_::"'=-:-_=.":" - :.:~.~f _ _____ ._ _._ . ___n _ _ ---'-'---'_'_u._ . __ __ ___._ 'n _ ______
- -.... _. . - - -.... --- --
--.---. .__._--_..---.------~-------~. ~
.. _. '...---.---...---------....---
-.........---....- --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO TAL · . . . . . . . . . . . . 666,036. 29
LESS 5 PERCENT RETAINED. . . . 33,301.81
----.-.----..-.-.-. - -.. D IFF ERE;\J C E --. _-. __.... _. ._. ..... ._... _ _. .__e.. .. . _632 , ~ 3~ ..4~___
PLUS 75 PERCENT MATLS ON HAND.. -D-
AY- TOTAL............ .632,734.48
. . - -~":"- ~.-:' ..'::" .::--~ - ~ .-:: .~-~ ::..':~-::'=':::-:~,::"" "':-:- .:-..=-=~-:- --:::-=::":'-.--___._L E S .S._PR E V J 0 U S.J> àY ~1 E N T S __. .... ._. _ _ . ___. _.... 6.0 0 43ß. .5
DATE- tl9 DIFFERENCE DUE THIS ESTI \'~ATE . . 32,295.49
----------------------- NOTE-PAY LAST AMOUNT SHOWN
TOT ALE AR N ¡ N G S. (I NCL '--.RETAIN. ) -.5._____.__.__ ..___ ,__. --_.TO JA L . B 10..::'_$.8 3117_0._11_.PE R C ENI::._.___._ __
TIME CHARGED THRU THIS PERIOD- CAYS TOTAL TIME- 355 DAYS PERCENT-
.-.- ..-.-.--.--.---.--------.-
At OVED-
KNO\.'/L TON-Eí\lGL I SH-FLO\'JERS, I ~'JC.
...--- CO;\! S U L T I NG -.E!'~ G l.i\lE E R S_.._ _ ._.
.. ------.--- - .--~-----.- "-' "-__'h .--- ._-~-_________.._ u.. .. .. _ . . ___ __ __ ___ _._
.----....-----
----------
_4____--.___
- .-----.---- ---.----.--- . ---.- - --------------.------ -- ..._. -' --.---.---------.---..-- -- --.--..------.---.-----.-----,----------.-- -----..-..,-
- .----. -~--,-- -.--...-...---.-- ..._---_._-_._-----~----_._----- -.--------- .--... --._-~_.-
--- __"h ______ _.___ _ _________._._.__. ..__._________________.___._______ _. .______
- - -.----. - - -_. .
-- .. _._------~.- - '-. _._--_..__._--------_._._--~...._-..--
- ---~ ---..---.----....- ......--.--.---------.-.--.- -~- _. -.
._---------_._-._---~---_.- -- .__.. --...- --------..--.- ....
.. .... ---.~ ._---- ---"-
-_._..- . --. --.. ~'-"~- - .
- --...---....- - ._.~.- --. ---.
- - - ".--. ....--- .-- -. - -- --.-
.
. -..._-_.__..._.~_.-..-.-. _..
. -- --- ---.-- .-. ~-
--. - - -- - -... _.
- ...~.. --..... ,- .
.~ ..__. - .......-.- -- -.------------. .---. ----_. ~---- ------..------.-.- - .._-
-- -~._----.. ~~, .
. .--.- ------ -..--. -..- .-. -~._- .~..
-"'... -" ---"--..--..-.--
n'
. . fj""" ..
~
..
..
.
.....3
,...-51
:::::::;
.:.:::::::;
·:;;;~a
FILE
g-3¡Ç
(!!'/-IAN&€
oti.P c;es
KNOWL TON- ENGLlSH- FLOWERS~ I NC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
June 16, 1982
Mr. Rodger N. line~ City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-315, CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS~
RUFE SNOW DRIVE PAVING & DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I
Enclosed is a copy of a letter from the Contraçtor for the referenced
project, Austin Road, requesting an extension in contract completion time
due to the recent inclement weather and other problems beyond their control.
The Contractor has asked for an extension of 30 calendar days for a total
completion time bf 385 days and a scheduled completion date of
October 31~ 1982. We would note that a previous extension of 40 calendar
days has already been granted for change orders throughout the course of
this project.
We concur that the Contractor is entitled to some amount of extension for
the reasons cited, but we do not have sped fi c document.ation for the
stated amount of 30 days. It is therefore our recommendation that the
Contractor be requested to furnish a chronoligical listing of days already
lost- to date with cause noted, and in the future, be required to submit
daily logs of their activity to the City Inspector~ Mr. Floyd McCallum,
for the remainder of the project duration~ fully documenting all construction
activity associated with the work on Rufe Snow Drive and noting any and all
reasons for delays and lost time. Based on this information~ the amount
of extension can then be determined.
Meanwhile~ we would strongly urge the Contractor to make every effort to
complete this project in a timely manner since proposed business and
commercial development along this arterial are being delayed and potential
tax revenue could also be lost~ to say ~othing of the continued inconvenience
to the general public.
if you have any questions.
\
lCHARD W.
RWA:mh
En c 1 .
cc: Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road Co.
Mr. Allen Bronstad~ Director of Development
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
SSO FIRST STATE BANK BLDG_ · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021. 817/283-6211. METRO/267-3367
..
.
.
.' ,......
.
··..4
~OUTING
......~)
.0:::"
~.,
n
~
Austin
JÍ)ß NO.
F I ~~G _
;\:.:c. . _ lLG
----
() :: ~'i~
"/, :-. E
r:PF
:::~~ - AiJJsti~· Road
An Austin Industries Company
~ 'JA
DHC
G'NF
-
L" -:'.'~I
--
tr r1 ~ --fY
-Austin Road Company
Fort Worth Division
1555 Merrimac Circle, Suite 214
817 336-2373
P.O. Box 2285
Fort Worth. Texas 76113
June 11, 1982
Mr. Richard Albin, P.E.
Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc.
600 First State Bank Bldg.
Bedford, Texas 76021
Re: Rufe Snow Drive, Phase I
Gentlemen:
As you may know we have experienced some delays on the above project
which we feel are abnormal. First, we have had rainfall far above
normal including a record fourteen inches in the month of May. Second,
we have been delayed by the slow response of various utilities in
relocating their facilities. The telephone company continues to delay
certain item of work.
It is requested that the contract time on this project be extended
thirty calendar days.
Yours truly,
~~>-
Vice President
BJB/ng
~~
~'_¥~!J"~i
DATE: 7-12-82
Bids on Traffic Signal - Davis Blvd. and Main St.
.
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
BACKGROUND:
Bids were taken on Ju~y 7, 1982 for the installation of subject traffic
signal.
Three bids were receiveq and are summarized below:
Cpmpany Total Bid Working Days Quoted
Sharrock Electric $37,693'.66 45 After Receipt of Equipment
Southwestern Electric 33,430.80 60 After Receipt of Equipment"
Innovative Systems 57,593.25 120
....
The bids from Shàrrock Electric and Southwestern Electric are both well below our
engineer's estimate of $40,867.25, with Southwestern the apparent low bidder. The
. .
. difference in bids is·$4,262,86; the bid by Sharrock some 13 percent. higher than
that of Southwestern Electric. However, Sharrock Electric has quoted a shorter
period for completion of the project.
(Cont~nued on next page)
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ItEQITIRED:
Approve Bid/Disapprove Bid
BUDGETED ITEM:
YES
NO X
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
General Fund Reserves
~-~~~--~~~~-~~--~-~~~~~-~-~--~---~-~~~~-~~-~--~~~~--~~----~-~~-----~-~-~~~~---~~-
.
.
.
.
..
,
Based on the above information we recommend awarding bid to Southwestern
Electric in the amount of $33,430.80 with completion date set at 60 days
after receipt of equipment.
.
.
.
DATE:
.July 12" 1982
SUBJECT:
Bids on Traffic Signal-Davis Boulevard & Main
DEP.c\RThlENT:
Administration
"
BACKGROUND: Bids were ta~en_on July 7, 1982, for the si~nalization
at Davis Boulevard and Main Street. Three bids were received. PA\vA Incorporated,
Consutling Engineers are tabulating the bids and will make a recommendatíon
to the Council~ You will receive their re~ommendation before the meeting
Monday night.
~
CITY COUNCIL ACTIO}1 l~EQlrIRED:
Approve Bid/Disapprove Bid'
BUDGETED ITEM:
ACCOUNT Nm1BER:
YES
NO
~-~~--~~~~~~----~---~----------~-~-------~~------~---~---~~--~~~~~~~-~~-~~~~~--~~~---