Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1981-07-08 Agendas CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 8, 1991 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. ! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I 1. IR 91-81 Richland Youth Association Proposal Regarding Concession Stand (5 Minutes) 2. IR 91-77 Fire Inspection Program (5 Minutes) 3. PU 91-22 Park Lighting Project (Agenda Item No. 19) (10 Minutes) 4. GN 91-96 Dan Echols Senior Adult Center (Agenda Item No. 16) (5 Minutes) 5. IR 91-76 Re-engagement of KPMG Peat Marwick for Fiscal Year 1990/91 Audit (5 Minutes) 6. PW 91-18 Public Hearing on Levying a Schedule of Charges for the Drainage Utility System - Ordinance No. 1741 (Agenda Item No. 20) (5 Minutes) 7. IR 91-78 Parks and Recreation Brochure - Recognition and IR 91-79 Texas Forest Service - Certificate of Merit (5 Minutes) 8. Other Items e e e 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1748 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE 1080 , THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ESTABLISH REGULATIONS REGARDING CARNIVALS AND SPECIAL EVENTS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAs, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Ci ty of North Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, by changing the said ordinance as set forth herein. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Section 24.4 TEMPORARY USES AND BUILDINGS be hereby amended to insert the following paragraph: (b) Carnivals, circuses and special fund raising events sponsored by a public entity, civic or non-profit organization located within the City may be held for a period not exceeding seven days on an open si te containing at least six acres in any non-residential zoning district, provided that adequate parking and sanitary facilities are made available to the satisfaction of the Building Official. There shall be at least 180 days between subsequent events at the same location and/or by the same sponsor. No reduction in any minimum zoning requirement shall be affected by such activity. To protect nearby residents, the Building Official shall establish the terms and conditions for the temporary use at the time of approval. 2. S~ILITY CLAUSE. That, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid jUdgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconsti tutionali ty shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the Ci ty Council wi thout the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. - - e e e 2 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That, Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. That, this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and PUblication as provided by the North Richland Hills Charter and the laws of the state of Texas. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13tIDAY OF Jm:lE 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 1991 DAY OF MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY - Page 3 P & Z Minutes June 13,1991 e There being no one, the Chairman called for those wishing to opposition to this amen come forward. There bei 0 one wishing to speak, Chai Brock closed the Public ing. Mr. Bowen said he felt this was something they had just overlooked and think it is a good thing to correct it. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 91-15. This motion was seconded by Mr. Miller and the motion carried 5-0. 4. PZ 91-09 Public Hearing to consider an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding Carnivals and other special events. e e Chairman Brock said the Commission has taken a long hard look at this, Mr. LeBaron has checked with several other cities to see how they handle carnivals and special events, and now has prepared an ordinance which reads as follows: "Carnivals, circuses and special fund raising events sponsored by a public entity, civic or non-profit organization located within the City may be held for a period not exceeding seven days on an open site containing at least six acres in any non-residential zoning district, provided that adequate parking and sanitary facilities are made available to the satisfaction of the Building Official. There shall be at least 180 days between subsequent events at the same location and/or by the same sponsor. No reduction in any minimum zoning requirement shall be affected by such activity. To protect nearby residents, the Building Official shall establish the terms and conditions for the temporary use at the time of approval." Page 4 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1991 e PZ 91-09 APPROVED 5. PS 91-10 e e -........ Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this amendment to please come forward. There being no one, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this amendment to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Marin made the motion to approve PZ 91-09. This motion was seconded by Mr. Collins and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Arthur E. Gordon for Preliminary Plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Green Valley Addition (previously submitted as Lot 1, Block 2). is property is located on the th side of Green Valley Drive be en Smithfield Road and Da s Boulevard. Mark came L and Associates represent Mr. Gordon. said there are two issues, 7 foot easement requirement along east side and the 15 foot building ne requirement, but they understand there is an existing building there. Mr. Long stated the building is already there. Chairman Brock stated that last Monday night, the City Council considered the school's plat to the west of this property and they required an addition 5 feet dedication for road widening for Green Valley Drive. Chairman Brock asked if Mr. Gordon would be willing to dedicate an additional 5 feet also. Page 3 P & Z Minutes April 25, 1991 e for compact cars. He said that is in the curr Ordinance is Ie; he not know it carne from. PZ 91-08 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 91-08 with the addition of the table for compact cars. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 7-0. 3. PZ 91-09 Public Hearing for consideration of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding carnivals and other special events. e Chairman Wood stated he would open the Public Hearing for anyone to speak, but would request this be tabled pending additional information from other cities to see how they handle these events. He stated that the current ordinance does not allow carnivals and other such events. PZ 91-09 TABLED Mr. Barfield made the motion to table PZ 91-09. This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 7-0. 4. PZ 91-13 Discussion of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding political signs. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Wood said case was for discussion only a e Commission has elected to ce discussion until a later date e meeting adjourned at 7:50 P.M. e Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Zoning Commission ~ Page 9 P & Z Minutes April 11, 1991 e 6. PZ 91-09 e 7. PZ 91-10 e They als the requirement mpact car parking and handicap parking. They asked Mr. LeBaron to do more study on this and bring back at the next meeting. . Discussion of proposed regulations regarding carnivals and other special events. Chairman Wood stated that the way the Zoning Ordinance is written, it does not allow carnivals. It was discussed that they should be allowed in some zoning district and give latitude to the staff to enforce the requirements, but not to give the responsibility to the City Council. It was also discussed that they could be in City parks and this could be coordinated with the recreation department. Discussion regarding the rezoning of an area in the Diamond Loch Subdivision from Duplex to a Sin Family Zoning District. Chairman Wood stated a portion of Diamond Loch Addit zoned for duplexes, R-5-D ut only one duplex was built, others were built as single ly R-l like the rest of Dia Loch. He asked if P & Z would t to initiate a zoning change to R-1 and contact all property owners within 200 feet of this property. Mr. LeBaron said the Zoning Ordinance says that the City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, or an owner of property or agent of the owner of property may initiate a zoning change. He said this zoning classification was done many years ago and the purpose of requesting a zone change would be to clean up the map. -- ~epartment: .., Public Hearing for Request of Bank of North Texas SUbject: for an Appeal Hearing to Rezone Tract 7, John's Addition, From its Present Classification of C-2 Commercial to 1-2 Industrial. This Property is Located on the East Side of Davis Boulevard, South of the Railroad Community Development CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7/8/91 Council Meeting Date: PZ 91-11 Agenda Number: Ordinance 111747 The Bank of North Texas submitted a request for a zoning district change on a 3 acre tract located on the east side of Davis Boulevard approximately 400 feet south of the Cotton Belt Railroad. The property contains a large building which has been used as a cabinet shop for a number of years. However, the property is currently zoned C-2 and a cabinet shop is not a permitted use in the C-2 zoning district. The Bank of North Texas requested a change to the 1-2 Industrial Zone to satisfy current zoning requirements. At the May 9th meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the request was denied by a 4-3 vote. At the June 10th City Council meeting, the Council set July 8th as the date to consider the request. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. , Finance Director Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) - Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget , Other ß" - ~ ~~ 'J) KC4 ,~-v-~ ~ ~ Deðartment Head Signature ' , ty Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Pa e 1 of AG ~ JtR-I Page 9 p & Z Minutes May 9, 1991 e Mr. Bowen seconded the motion and the vote was 4-3 with Marin, Lueck, and Brock voting against. The motion carried. 4. PZ 91-11 Public Hearing for request of the Bank of North Texas to rezone Tract 7, John's Addition, from its present classification of C-2 Commercial to 1-2 Industrial. This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and south of the railroad. e Mr. LeBaron stated this tract of land at one time had a cabinet shop in it, but a cabinet shop is not an allowed use in C-2 zoning and the building does not conform to the masonry requirement for C-2 zoning. He said the structure is currently vacant and before it can be used again, it either needs to be rezoned to 1-2 or the building be brought up to code and be used for something other than a cabinet shop. Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. e Councilman Scoma came forward. He stated that he was speaking on behalf of several neighbors who has property adjacent to or in the vicinity of the property being requested for rezoning. He said he understands the bank needs to utilize this facility for revenue purposes and not just let it set there. Councilman Scoma said he understands it is non-conforming. He said they are totally in agreement in making it where a cabinet shop can be Page 10 p & Z Minutes May 9, 1991 e in that facility. He said they don't object to the cabinet shop as they have lived with it for years. e Councilman Scoma said one of the major concerns is that this Planning and Zoning Commission and the Council has done a lot of work looking at the zoning map of the city and establishing some areas where industrial would work. He said they have at the present time, no industrial property on the east side of Davis Boulevard, south of the rail road tracks except for a piece in front of the new post office that is zoned industrial. He said it ties into the old airport property that is zoned industrial. Councilman Scoma said that was intended to be opened up as a road into some large tracts that would encourage manufacturing companies to move here. e Councilman Scoma said one objection that they have is not only does this represent industrial zoning, it is considered to be a commercial area according to our master plan, but it is also a small tract of land that limits the use of this property to such things as machine shops, plumbing shops, sheet metal shops, welding shops that have outdoor storage. He said this is not compatible with the residential area; it is not compatible with what the residents were told when they bought their property. He said there is a piece of agricultural property behind the houses in Sunnybrook and their concern is if we approve the industrial zoning carte blanche that there will be an attempt in the future to make it industrial also. Councilman Scoma said he encourages P & Z tonight as a homeowner in the area to restrict the industrial use to only a cabinet shop or to reject the request for general industrial use. Page 11 p & Z Minutes May 9, 1991 e B. J. Wilkinson, 6433 Westgate, came forward. He said Westgate backs up to this area. He said these houses were built within this last year and there are about 30 houses there. He said all the homeowners were told this would remain as it is and we are concerned. Robert Hightower, 6437 Westgate Drive, came forward. He said he is close enough to the cabinet shop to hit it with a rock. He said he has two small children. He said when he moved in he specifically asked what it was zoned and was told it was commercial. Mr. Hightower said he didn't have a problem with that and he would like it to remain that way. e Keith Smith, 6441 Westgate Drive, came forward. He said they were told it was currently commercial and would probably stay that way. He asked Mr. LeBaron about what he said about the bank having a proposed use for the property. Mr. LeBaron said their application said the sale was contingent on getting the zoning change. Mr. Smith asked about the same usage. Mr. Bowen stated that the cabinet shop was a non-conforming use, it was already there. He said there is some question as to where it has been vacant for 6 months or not. Mr. LeBaron read what was written on the application: "Previous use was inconsistent with zoning. Similar use will be established if zoning change can be obtained." e Mr. Lueck asked if a cabinet shop could go in if the building was brought up to code. Page 12 p & Z Minutes May 9, 1991 e Mr. LeBaron stated it could not. Mr. Smith said he has a problem with changing the zoning to industrial, but has no objection to the cabinet shop. He said it opens the gate to allow businesses that are not favorable and it will lower the property value of these houses. Mr. Barfield asked if he was aware of the outdoor storage allowed in C-2 zoning. He said you can have 20% of the lot for outdoor storage in C-2 without changing the zoning. Mr. Barfield said the cabinet shop would have to be in Industrial zoning and he is not sure we, as a Board, are at liberty to pick and choose in the Industrial zoning. e Ron Wright came forward. He said his family has property at 8217 and 8221 Cardinal Lane. He said he feels that a zoning change would hurt the use of the property. Mr. Wright said his family has owned the property for 50 years and do not look forward to it being used as industrial. He asked what percent outdoor storage is allowed in industrial zoning. Mr. Pence said there is no outdoor storage in Industrial zoning. Mr. Wright said he is still opposed to the industrial zoning. Jack King, 8301 Cardinal, came forward. He said he was against this for all the same reasons. He said he and his wife took a survey of the residential area and they were 100% in opposition to this request and said they would sign a petition. e Page 13 p & Z Minutes May 9, 1991 e e Councilman Scoma came forward again. He said he would like to address Mr. Barfield's comment in regard to the restriction of not being allowed to pick and choose. Councilman Scoma stated that the staff attorney has told us that we can, the P & Z can, or the council can restrict the use of that property to a cabinet shop, if that is what we want to do under 1-2. He said he and the neighbors are not opposed to the cabinet shop; it was already there when they moved into the area. Councilman Scoma said they would understand if it had to be rezoned to accommodate that. He said the concern is now you are opening up, if you should resolve and the council approve the 1-2 zoning, you then would have contiguous property adjacent to that and it would be inclined to be zoned industrial and then the whole area would be industrial and would allow types of businesses we do not want, so you can restrict that too based on Rex McEntire's comments the other day. Jeff Walter, 6425 Westgate, came forward. He thanked Councilman Scoma for his leadership tonight. Mr. Walter said he echoes the feelings of his neighbors tonight, he said he and his wife are against this rezoning for the same reasons. Captain Michael Plan, U.S.A.F., address 6409 Amundson, came forward. He stated he has plans to sell his home within the next year and if you open this up to industrial, it would definitely affect the resale of his property. He said he has no problem with what is already there. e Chairman Brock asked for a show of hands of the ones present who are in opposition to the rezoning. Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. Work Session (5 Minutes) 10. *Executive Session (5 Minutes) a. Personnel b. Briefing on Pending Litigation c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition 114. 1 Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. , CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CI1Y COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 8, 1991 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting June 24, 1991 5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions None 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19) 8. PZ 91-09 Public Hearing for Consideration of an Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1080 Regarding Carnivals and Other Special Events - Ordinance No. 1748 Page 2 I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN ! 9. PZ 91-11 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Bank of North Texas for an Appeal Hearing to Rezone Tract 7, John's Addition, from C-2 Commercial to 1-2 Industrial (Located on the east side of Davis Boulevard south of the railroad) I 10. I Ordinance No. 1747 I ! 11. PZ 91-15 Public Hearing for Consideration of an Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1080 Regarding Day Care/Kindergartens in U-Institutional Zone - Ordinance No. 1749 12. GN 91-90 Appointments to the Charter Revision Commission (1991) - Resolution No. 91-23 (Tabled at the June 14, 1991 Meeting) 13. GN 91-92 Basketball Goals and Other Obstructions or Hazards in the Street Right-of-Way - Ordinance No. 1743 * 14. GN 91-93 Appointments to Board of Appeals *15. GN91-95 Appointments to Park and Recreation Board *16. GN 91-96 Dan Echols Senior Adult Center *17. PU 91-20 Approve Purchase of Right-af-Way from Robert and Gloria Hesch for the Proposed Construction of Bursey Road (Parcel # 11 ) II> Page 3 I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I *18. PU 91-21 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way from Eddie and Doris Warren for the Proposed Construction of Bursey Road (Parcel #12) I *19. PU 91-22 I Park Lighting Project I I 20. PW 91-18 Public Hearing on Levying a Schedule of Charges for the Drainage Utility System - Ordinance No. 1741 21. Citizens Presentation Mr. Fritz Radmacher 9124 Nob Hill Drive Re: Request for Appeal Hearing - Woodland Oaks Zoning Case Denial I 22. I Adjournment I I PfJSTED ~ - 3 -4 / Date ---- ¿¡:C¿o 12.m ''firne City Secretary B~r::!?~~ -"'-<....--..........-- ~. .~.............. INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AN D CITY COUNCIL No. IR 91-81 e Date: July 8, 1991 Subject: Richland Youth Association Proposal Regarding Concession Stand Richland Youth Association officers have made informal inqu1r1es recently about City participation in expanding the concession stand at Richfield Park. The present concession stand/storage building is seriously inadequate and overcrowded. RYA officers have developed a plan whereby the existing building could be expanded, utilizing free labor provided by RYA members, with the City purchasing the materials. The estimated cost of the materials is $15,000. Mayor Brown has requested that this item be discussed by the City Council, and referred to the Parks and Recreation Board for consideration and recommendation if the Council wishes to pursue this project. Respectfull ¡efl ubmitted, e Rodger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp e ISSUED BY TH E CITY MANAG ER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS e e e INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 91-77 ^ ~~ -c::::::.:::: .. ::::::=- ~~ V Date: July 8, 1991 Subject: Fire Inspection Program At the budget study session last year, the City Council directed that consideration be given to reestablishing the annual Fire Safety Inspection Program which was previously performed in North Richland Hills. The possibility of establishing fees to partially offset its cost was also proposed. The Fire Chief and his staff have thoroughly studied this proposal and have submitted the attached information. It appears that most Tarrant County Fire Departments conduct annual inspection programs, but only Fort Worth and Bedford charge a fee therefor. The anticipated gröss revenue from establishing fees as listed in the attached draft ordinance totals approximately $20,000 per year exclusive of billing and collection costs. As pointed out by Chief Gertz, there is a strong possibility that the collection difficulties and negative reaction from our business community migh~ offset this relatively minor revenue gain. Chief Gertz and his staff fully support the proposal to reestablish the annual inspection program. We request the City Council's guidance regarding establishing a fee for this service. Respectfully submitted, /(1l/~ Rodger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NOATH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS _ ~J\1_ ~\F" e INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM (\~ ~/ SUBJECT: STAN GERTZ, FIRE CHIEF ~ DANNY TAYLOR, DIVISION CHIEF M/;E: FIRE INSPECTION PROGRAM 91-145 TO FROM 06/05/91 As requested I have gathered all information concerning on going fire inspections for fee programs currently operated in this area. Fort Worth and Bedford are the only cities that have an active program at this time. Shown below are the ways that their systems work. Fort Worth Engine companies due in-service inspecti.ons of all businesses. After the inspection is complete a three piece form is filled out. One copy is given to the business owner, one copy is kept by the Engine company and the third is sent to Fire Prevention to be entered in the computer. The computer develops a bill from the information on the form. The amount of the bill 1S determined by square footage of the building or space occupied. e The bill is mailed to the business with 30 days to pay. If not paid a reminder is sent with 14 days to pay. If it is still not paid another 14 day notice is sent. If at the end of 58 days and three notices the bill has still not been paid, citations may be issued. Bedford Bedford operates completely different. They require an annual Fire Marshal's permit. The permit 1S issued to the building owner rather than individual tenants. The annual bill is sent out in November of each year and is due by January 1. They, like Fort Worth send a total of three notices. Two after January 1 if not paid on time. After the three notices have been sent and no fee has been received, citations may be issued. When their Engine companies due in-service inspections they ask to see their permits. If they do not have a current permit they are asked to go to the Fire Prevention office and get a permit. Their information is also sent to the Fire Prevention Division for follow up. e This system works much like our environmental department permits. Ron Hawthorne said their program has been going for four years and they received around a 97% collection rate. He also said the first year was tough and the people were not happy campers. _~/~-- e~\f TO INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: RODGER LINE, CITY MANAG~~ REF: STAN GERTZ, FIRE CHIEF ~ DATE: FIRE INSPECTION PROGRAM WITH FEE 91-133 FROM MAY 28, 1991 The above program was suggested by members of the city council while attending the budget workshop in Waco in July, 1990. This program would require the fire department truck companies to make annual fire inspections of all businesses, retail stores, schools (private and public), and churches. At the conclusion of each inspection, the place of business will be presented with a fire inspection invoice. The amount of the fee is based on the attached memo under purposed ordinance #1692. Meetings with Finance Director, Lee Maness and the City Attorney indicate there are no legal methods in collecting these fees from businesses who fail to make payment within the allotted time period. e without a procedure to collect overdue fire inspection fees, this program has the ear marks of a failure, while creating a poor city image to our business people. Especially when one business owner learns he has paid his inspection fee and his neighbors business did not, and no action will be taken to collect on the overdue account. Please schedule this item on a pre-council agenda at your convenience. SRG:cs e e e e ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, in order to protect the health and safety of the public, the health and safety of employees in places of business, the health and safety of business invitees and the health and safety of firefighters it is necessary to require that each place of business within the City undergo an annual fire safety inspection by the office of the Fire Marshall; IT IS THEREFORE ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The Office of the Fire Marshall of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas shall conduct an annual fire-safety inspection upon each business or commercial premise within the City. The purpose of the inspection shall be to ascertain that the premises inspected are in compliance with the Fire Code of the City. 2. In the event that the annual inspection reveals that the premises are in violation of the Fire Code, the Fire Marshall will point out to the person or firm occupying the premises, in writing, the nature of the violation and will order, in writing, that such violation be corrected and abated within a reasonable time. The period of time shall not be less than ten days. Upon being satisfied that the premises meet the Fire Code the Fire Marshall shall issue a satisfactory fire inspection certificate. It shall be unlawful to operate any type of business or commercial operation within the City without a current fire safety inspection certificate attached. 3. The occupant shall pay an annual fire safety inspection fee based upon the size of the premises inspected, as follows: Less than 5, 000 Sq. Ft. $ 15 5,001 to 10,000 Sq. Ft. $ 25 10,001 to 25,000 Sq. Ft. $ 30 25,001 to 50,000 Sq. Ft. $ 40 50,001 to 75,000 Sq. Ft. $ 60 75,001 to 100,000 Sq. Ft. $ 75 100,001 to 200,000 Sq. Ft. $100 200,001 Sq. Ft. or more $200 e e e Ordinance No. Page 2 Such inspection fee shall be paid to the Finance Office of the City within 30 days of the inspection. When such inspection fee is not paid within said 30 days period, the occupant shall be deemed in violation of this ordinance. 4. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any portion of this ordinance shall be deemed to be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not in excess of $200. Each day of violation shall be a separate offence. 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage and publication as required by law. 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of APPROVED: ATIEST: Tommy Brown - Mayor Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - Attorney for the City City of JXòrth Richland Hills e e e January 31, 1991 TO: Stan Gertz FROM: Camelia Fisher SUBJECT: Fire Inspection Accounts Receivable I just wanted to briefly follow-up on our conversation of several weeks ago. We are available at your convenience to get started on the accounts receivable for fire inspections. The only suggestions we had were the ones covered in the meeting in Lee Maness's office which dealt with the modification of the forms and the inclusion of a late payment penalty of $10.00 in the Fire Inspection Ordinance. The addition of the $10 late payment penalty will assist us in the event the account has to be turned over to a collection agency. The form modification should include the following additional information: Billing Name and Address Tax ID # Ticket # Please give me a call when you are ready to get started so someone can be available to process your documents. /J / ~~_, L¿2 ~u::¿(e'~ ,,_~ -;:þ;Í¿/f-- Camelia Fisher (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 e e e RODGER LINE, CITY t-1ANAGER 90-041 FEBRUARY 12, 199~ STAN GERTZ, FIRE CHIEF AREA FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTION FEES The followjng fire departments surveyed in thjs area currently charge a fee as indjcated or have no fee as the jnspection may not be performed by the local department. Annual Inspection Fee Fort Worth Fire Department Less than 5,000 Sq. Ft. 5,001 to 10,000 Sq. Ft. 10,001 to 25,000 Sq. Ft. 25,001 to 50,000 Sq. Ft. 50,001 to 75,000 Sq. Ft. 75,001 to 100,000 Sq. Ft. 100,001 or More $20 $25 $30 $45 $75 S95 $95 + S15 For Each Addjtjonal 50,000 Sq. Ft. Bedford Fire Department Less than 5,000 Sq. Ft. 5,001 to 10,000 Sq. Ft. 10,001 to 25,000 Sq. Ft. 25,001 to 50,000 Sq. Ft. 50,001 to 75,000 Sq. Ft. 75,001 to 100,000 Sq. Ft. 100,001 to 200,000 Sq. Ft. 200,000 or More $15 $25 $30 $40 $60 $75 $100 $200 e e e Page 2 Inspectjon Fees Contjnued Lewjsvjlle Fire Department $25 Arljngton Fire Department No Fee Hurst Fjre Department No Fee Grapevjne Fjre Department No Fee Coppell pjre Department No Fee Euless Fjre Department No Fee e e e INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ~~ ~ V No. IR 91-76 Date: July 8, 1991 Subject: Re-engagement of KPMG Peat Marwick for Fiscal Year 1990/91 Audit The City Council originally selected KPMG Peat Marwick to perform the annual audit for the City in August 1981. The initial contract was for five years. That contract expired at the conclusion of the audit for fiscal year 1984/85. An extension was granted in February 1986 for three years and again in July of 1989 for an additional three years. The current contract will expire at the conclusion of the audit for fiscal year ending September 30, 1991. The re-engagement letter to affirm the KPMG Peat Marwick contract and approve the audit fee is awaiting my signature. The fee for this year's audit will be the same as last year or a fee not to exceed $36,225. It is the suggestion of staff that City Council consider looking at the alternatives of retaining Peat Marwick or requesting proposals from other firms for future audits. Guidance is requested from City Council. Respectfully submitted, ¡)I \ . L;~' ðH{M~ / / C. A. Sanford Assistant City Manager _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS ~ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 91-7R e ~ c::::::: x ::::::::=- .~~ Date: July 8, 1991 Subject: Parks and Recreation Brochure - Recognition The North Richland Hills Parks and Recreation brochure, "Leisure Celebration" was recently the subject of an article in the Course Trends publication of the Learning Education Resources Network. The Course Trends magazine is a trade journal published and distributed throughout the united states and Canada. The Learning Education Resource Network is a national professional organization specializing in the marketing and promotion of recreation and continuing education programs. vickie Loftice, Assistant Superintendent of Recreation, attended a LERN Conference this past year and implemented many new ideas into the brochure layout and design. The brochure contributed significantly to our largest recreation program enrollment ever. Respectfully Submitted, -=-\~ Jim Browne Director 4IÞ Parks and Recreation Department ATTACHMENT: "Before and After: How to Set a Record Enrollment", Course Trends, June, 1991. e _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NOATH AICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS ~ e KIM Registrar+ Managing Registration ... The KIM series of management sys- tems for continuing education and staff development represent a commitment to the business of education. We bring improved productivity and increased fu- ture attendance through better market- ing and client relations. Regardless of your title. one of your primary interests is to provide the high- est quality program or series of pro- grams possible for your participants. The less time you are required to spend on the administrative aspects of managing a program means you have more time to pay attention to the program itself. KIM Registrar+ and associated sys- tems provide a prfessional approach to meeting management. e Building Marketing ... The attributes you assign at registra- tiQn become codes you use later to assemble mailing lists. These lists market other programs likely to be of interest to each participant. Your marketing in- creases in sophistication as you are able to "target" your publicity. Special Offer! e For a limited time, you can receive: The basic KIM Registrar+ system. One year's maintenance. including sup- port. continuing toll-free phone con- sultation and problem solving -- a $300 valu e! Free two-day training for up to two staff members at LERN Headquarters. All for only $995, the regular base system price! This offer is for LERN members only, and space is limited. so act now for this special offer! For information, contact Kim Brecheisen. Conference Coordinator, at 1-800-678-LERN, or FAX: (913) 539-7766. 4 Before and After: How to Set a Record Enrollment After staff of the City of North Richland Hills attended the LERN national conference, they went back home and made revisions in their brochure, based on infonnation from the conference. The brochure cover below demonstrates the changes from their original design and fonnat. The brochure, which brought in a record enrollment, also featured a revised table of contents, registration page, and back page. This brochure drew record enrollments. ".......... . . IIw '''' II ...··-··-··-··--l··· .. Table of . Contents , )l)uth . . . . . . . · · . . . . . . . · · . . 4 t Gymna~tics ......... .. , . . . S : BaUet " Tap, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s I Sp«ìalEwnu I (Aru & Crafts Show. Eastff : In The Park) . .. .. . . . . . . .. i , Teen4S ....................8 f'itness Center .. . . . . . . . . . . 10 Health ~itness . . . . . . . . . . . .10 Aerohics .. It . . .. . .. . It .. 12 Spccia (nl~r~t ........... 13 'I Senior Lifestvles .. .. , . ... .IS Clubs .. . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 t Thtrapeutic Re\.'1'eation .... 16 ¡ I AlhlftiCS ................ 17 j Community .: .. . .. . . .. .. . 19 ,. Summer PrevIeW .. .. . .. .. . 20 Facility In(ormation . . . . . . . 21 t R~\'ations ............. 21 Cltntrallnformation ......22 Jtesistration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 . .~ ..'i\ , I·", L .. ~, ! i' ~J t~ ,.- :'t : ~ y . ','.:\ ~~ ~ ',;>" ~. <.,........<.~. . . 'lflth,u ¡ ': ~ ~¥¡ '" -.-..I"rr-L I aVWU' " ..~_.... . . _'''' s ~ i~h~~ . ;:::.:',:"::::~:-~~' , (f. . \ 'I Jt ~ :.~:...,,:::.:'::~'.:::~~~4.~;: .:'.. ,~..<".:..1..:~ ..: .,.;.,ò ,........ . ._'_n ....-...--....-...-...-....,--...; Using graphics on the contents page increases readership. nii)i ·>f1.f**~t"-'~f.t~fAii'ií~~..t:frï I~M ':>"';''t! < . '~~' I ';y ~if, iM¡.p q ;':' . ;t t;~~1' ~i~s~~eAE~i~~~~ii~~! . ~ :~I" (¡" .<y.." H.~".., 11"" I"." .: - ::<.. I':,,·~~ Ii. RKN';I,j"" 1 I <H~.·:::~~ï4,~ ~ ;; L.::=~ ~>. ;,j ~~. ....~~:~ P;:',~.1 1~~.$1$t ~~.Ial-· L~.... :$\~'?*~~t.>'tX) .... . ;·:::t~.1lli~~~;~..~../~. This is the original brochure design -- before changes. Re~istratìo.~. . ...... ..." 1·7S~~i?tEt§í.~Ii;;:2·· ._:....._~.....~.......I...... "............-..........~. ........~ t.........n._ .......~.~=~~£;:~~~~~~::~ ~âg~.:::.:.=.::::.:-',dl :?;;;~:~ª£¿¿== !!~~~ii~¡i!~ i~~~0:·~.:;:;~~3 .....u_~..............:-......__,u...._. ,~----..~'.;..;.:~~...;,~~~.;.;y..~.......-:.. :-.: ~;_...-........-........ -...............~.--- ,,"'... .......: I.....~ ......,..-.-..........~... ........._.-.... ,.....__ f."""'" .:-......., -. _, -. - 1M '~r'" _.~ _.".~.... -.... _..._.... ~....~..._....,.......---...:O:-""~<.';~ .; ......."...-.. ......~r-'.M>..::::::::::.:::.:::::.: Clear presentation of registration infonnation and using two enrollment fonns can help increase registrations. For more infonnation on the 1991 LERN Conference scheduled for Nov. 21-23 in Philadelphia, call Kim at 1-800-678-5376. Course Trends, June 1991 INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 91-79 Date: July 8, 1991 Subject: Texas Forest Service - certificate of Merit The North Richland Hills Parks and Recreation Department was recently awarded a "certificate of Merit" for outstanding community service through the improvement of the urban environment. The "certificate of Merit" was presented by the Texas Forest Service and the Texas Urban Forestry council as a part of the Texas Urban Forestry Awards Program. The North Richland Hills Urban Forestry Initiative, headed by Tim Hightshoe under the direction of Jack Giarcomarro, was submitted for award consideration by the Department. Since starting an urban forestry program in North Richland Hills two years ago, the Parks and Recreation Department has: _ constructed two (2) tree farms with "drip system" irrigation. _ conducted a city-wide tree inventory on public grounds. _ completed tree planting projects at municipal buildings, city parks and numerous medians throughout the city. Approximately 1,500 trees have been planted on city grounds, parks and tree farms or have been distributed to our citizens through this program. The Parks and Recreation Department is currently in the process of applying for two (2) grants for tree planting programs administered through the Texas Forest Service. Respectfully Submitted, +~ Jim Browne Director Parks and Recreation Department ATTACHMENT: certificate of Merit ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTtl·RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS w.I U - ~ w.I ~ t;;" ~ w.I C ~. ~ o -- ~ ~ ... ..I - u z = o u ~ ... «-" w.I r¥ o -- z -< = = ~ ~ ... w.I = I- Cf) ......... ~ E-4 Cf) o ~ ~ < ª ~ e ~ b' ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ B~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ .i:: ~o '?: V) Q) V) Q) ~ .... e .4-J Q)-C ~~ > .4-J ~ Q) c: 0 -- Q).... ~ -5 EJ2 (1)~ tò c c.c:ð üe.Q~~ e -- .4-J -- OJ ~ > -- E c: c: c: c: l) Q) bOO ~ L.. 0·- ~ oeu~ð ~ ~ Q)"Qj~ Q) -e .... · a.. r- bO :J _5 E ~ .5 ~ ü 0 .9 -u .4-J c: u ~ bI) ~ t;; .5 ~ u ::J c: o ~ .... ..c J2 ~ c: -- "'- a ~ u ~ ~ QJ .- .c .. ~ r- .~ .~ .I::. c. ~ < c o c (1) .~ lJ \j. = c.. W') ~ ~ ~ £~ '--I- o~ w.I = o w. Z < = = = ~ ~ I- e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CI1Y COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CI1Y HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JUNE 24, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order June 24, 1991, at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Byron Sibbet Mack Garvin Mark Wood Jo Ann Johnson Charles Scoma Linda Spurlock Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman e Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath C.A. Sanford Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Greg Dickens City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Absent: Lyle E. Welch Councilman 2. INVOCATION Councilman Garvin gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 10, 1991 APPROVED Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the minutes of the June 10, 1991 City Council meeting. Motion carried 6-0. June 24, 1991 Page 2 e 5. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS None Sergeant Pitts and Officer Beale presented a plaque to the Council for the City's support of Desert Storm. 6. SPECIAL PRESENTATION OF "LANDSCAPE OF THE MONTH" AWARD FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 1991 Mayor Brown and Janice Davis, Beautification Committee Chairman, presented the "Landscape of the Month" award for June to NCNB, 6100 Rufe Snow Drive and Shadow Creek Apartments, 6715 Buenos Aires. e 7. SPECIAL PRESENTATION OF "YARD OF THE MONTH" AWARDS FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 1991 Mayor Brown and Janice Davis, Beautification Committee Chairman, presented the "Yard of the Month" awards for the month of June to: Mr. and Mrs. Curtis Cheek, 660 Briley; Mr. and Mrs. Don Tyner, 7108 Bermuda Court; Mr. and Mrs. Frank Kujak, 6729 Mabell; Mr. and Mrs. Frank Pilarski, 7740 Red Oak; Mr. and Mrs. Travis Daniel, 6816 Corona; Mr. and Mrs. Phillip Norman, 8004 Clark Drive; Mr. and Mrs. Bennie Dennis, 6655 Chilton Drive; and Mr. and Mrs. John Depuma, 6613 Hillside Court. 8. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Scoma removed Items No. 16 and 17 and Councilman Garvin removed Item No. 10 from the Consent Agenda. 9. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (14, 15, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 & 27) APPROVED e Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. June 24, 1991 Page 3 e 10. PS 91-06 REQUEST OF NORTHRIDGE II JOINT VENTURE FOR REPLAT OF LOT lR AND LOTS 27R THROUGH 48R, BLOCK 4, NORTHRIDGE ADDITION (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HARWOOD ROAD AND BOB DRIVE) APPROVED Councilman Wood abstained from discussion due to conflict of interest. Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Scoma, to approve PS 91-06 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 5-0; Councilman Wood abstaining. e 11. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF LONE STAR COMPANY'S RATE INCREASE REQUEST - COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to reconsider Lone Star Gas Company's rate increase request. Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, Councilmen Garvin and Wood, Councilwomen Johnson and Spurlock voting for and Councilman Scoma voting against. 12. GN 91-81 LONE STAR GAS RATE INCREASE REQUEST ORDINANCE NO. 1742 APPROVED Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No. 1742. There was discussion on the increase in cost to the School District. Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, Councilmen Garvin and Wood, Councilwomen Johnson and Spurlock voting for and Councilman Scoma voting against. 13. GN 91-86 ADOPTING A FRANCHISE WITH LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS (SUNBELT), INC. ORDINANCE NO. 1745 APPROVED June 24, 1991 Page 4 e Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No. 1745. Mr. Herb Allred, representative from Laidlaw, spoke in favor of the request. Councilman Garvin amended his motion, seconded by Councilman Wood, to include an indemnity clause in the agreement. Ms. Mary Smith, representing North Hills Mall, advised Council North Hills Mall would like to take bids from other waste haulers. Staff advised Ms. Smith the Manager of North Hills Mall and Laidlaw should meet and try to work out the problem. Motion carried 6-0. e *14. GN 91-87 CONSTRUCTION OF EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING APPROVED *15. GN 91-88 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING JOINT ELECTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 91-24 APPROVED 16. GN 91-89 AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 1554 - BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION ORDINANCE NO. 1746 APPROVED Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1746 with the following changes: change first function to "increase community awareness of beautification issues"; change second function to "provide opportunities for community education relating to beautification issues"; change third function to "include special community wide events relating to beautification issues"; and change fourth function to "make recommendations on ordinances, policies, and landscape plans on major projects on city property relative to beautification" . Motion carried 6-0. June 24, 1991 Page 5 e 17. GN 91·90 APPOINTMENTS TO THE CHARTER REVISION COMMISSION (1991) RESOLUTION NO. 91-23 TABLED Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to table Resolution No. 91-23. Motion carried 6-0. 18. GN 91-91 RENAMING OF THE GLENVIEW CENTER RESOLUTION NO. 91-25 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet, to approve Resolution No. 91-25. Motion carried 6-0. e *19. PU 91-18 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM HARVEY AND REDA HARRIS FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF BURSEY ROAD (PARCEL #8) APPROVED *20. PU 91-19 PURCHASE OF TRACTOR AND MOWING UNIT FOR PARKS DEPARTMENT APPROVED 21. PW 91-18 PUBLIC HEARING ON LEVYING A SCHEDULE OF CHARGES FOR THE DRAINAGE UTILI1Y SYSTEM ORDINANCE NO. 1741 RECESSED Staff gave a short summary on action previously taken on this item. There had been several changes in the law pertaining to drainage utility since the last time this item was discussed. Mayor Brown had withdrawn his signature from the original ordinance because at that time a three-fourth's vote was required. Attorney for the City was to request an opinion from the Attorney General on the action previously taken. tþ Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Cliff Stevens, 9201 Kirk Lane, had questions on who would be assessed. Mr. Stevens was advised that at this point it had not been worked out. June 24, 1991 Page 6 e Mr. Doug Long, 1615 Precinct Line Road, Suite 106, Hurst, had questions on the way the fee would be applied. Staff responded. Mr. Bob Bartley, 7424 Continental, wanted to know how the fee would be applied. Ms. Myrtis Byrd, 7312 Hialeah Circle West, asked since the Council had now found the fees would vary, did it void the legal notice. Attorney for the City replied no. Mayor Brown recessed the hearing until July 8th at 7:30 p.m. Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet advised there would be a work session on this item July 1st at 6:30 p.m. Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, for the Attorney for the City to request an opinion from the Attorney General. e Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, Councilmen Wood and Scoma and Councilwomen Spurlock and Johnson voting for and Councilman Garvin voting against. *22. PW 91-19 AWARD OF BID FOR VALLEY PARK ESTATES SEWER IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *23. PW 91-20 APPROVE CONTRACT FOR ENHANCEMENT STUDY FOR BURSEY ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT APPROVED *24. PW 91-21 AWARD OF BID FOR CRANE ROAD SEWER IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *25. PAY 91-06 APPROVE PAYMENT FOR AIR CONDITIONING TO AMERICAN AIR AND HEAT APPROVED CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Community Development 7/8/91 Department: Subject: Public Hearing for Consideration of Amendment to Council Meeting Date: PZ 91-09 Agenda Number: Zoning Ordinance #1080 Regarding Carnivals and Special Events. Ordinance #1748 The City has in the past occassionly received requests from various civic and community non-profit organizations seeking permission to hold fund raising events. For example, last year the YMCA on Davis Boulevard was denied a request to use a small carnival as an attraction for a year end fund drive. Unfortunately, the Zoning Ordinance does allow this use. During discussions regarding a proposed ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission requested the staff to survey carnival and special event regulations from neighboring cities. According to the results of the survey, cities address this problem in a variety of ways. For example, some cities have a special ordinance regarding carnivals and special events, whereas other cities may include a provision for carnivals in their zoning ordinance. The following is a brief description of the results of this survey. Haltom City - The regulation pertaining to carnivals is a separate ordinance apart from the zoning ordinance. A carnival event is allowed virtually anywhere in the city provided that a permit is obtained from the Police Chief. Grapevine - This city requires special permission be granted by the City Council for carnivals, fairs and special events. The City Manager may approve such an event when the request is made by a civic or non-profit organization. Hurst - This city has a separate ordinance regulating carnivals which requires a permit from the City Secretary. In addition, this use is only permitted in the Outdoor Commercial Zoning District. These were the only cities responding to our request. The staff has prepared the attached proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding carnivals and other special events. This ordinance, if approved, will allow a carnival or special event on non-residentially zoned properties when sponsored by a civic or non-profit organization and only when the site contains a minimum of six open acres. No fee will be charged applicants for such a permit issued under this provision. However, the City Council may want to establish a fee for this permit when other permit fees are considered at some point in the future. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ ~ 3~H~_ ß~ t2 ~__- , - partment Head Signature ,- tyPJIanager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I Finance Director Pa e 1 of 2 Page 2 July 8, 1991 e The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of this amendment at their June 13th meeting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. e e e e . June 24, 1991 Page 7 *26. PAY 91-07 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.2 IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,417.82 TO AXON, INC. FOR WATAUGA ROAD IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *27. PAY 91-08 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 12 IN THE AMOUNT OF $0.00 TO CIRCLE "C" CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR MACKEY CREEK IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II APPROVED 28. CITIZENS PRESENTATION None. 29. ADJOURNMENT Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 6-0. Tommy Brown - Mayor A nEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary Page 14 P & Z Minutes May 9, 1991 e There were a number of hands raised. Chairman Brock asked if there was anyone who had anything different to say. No one else came forward so Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. e Mr. Barfield said he understands the attorney has discussed with Councilman Scoma that you can pick and choose in the menu, but it has been our direction that you could not. He said P & Z has had its hands slapped on a few occasions when we would pick and choose. Mr. Barfield said he could not vote for a zone change until we get a directive from the City Attorney on this matter. He said he would like to table this until they get an answer from the City Attorney. Mr. Lueck asked Mr. LeBaron if something has changed that P & Z does not know about. Mr. LeBaron said we just have to take the directive from the City Attorney. Mr. Bowen asked if we do zone it 1-2 for a cabinet shop and if he wants to fall to something else, what would he fall back to, C-2, I-I? Mr. LeBaron said he could not answer that. Mr. Barfield said he felt we should give the owner of the property a chance to address these issues. Chairman Brock said it seems it is the consensus that if it is not used as a cabinet shop, it should be left C-2. e Mr. Collins suggested they leave it C-2 and the owner come back in for a specific use permit. Page 15 P & Z Minutes May 9, 1991 e e PZ 91-11 DENIED 5. PZ 91-12 Mr. Barfield said we might need to do that so he will not have to pay more fees, but he thinks we should give him the chance to come back and address the issues. He said the Chairman can re-open the Public Hearing at that meeting. Mr. Bowen said you cannot use a specific use. He said if you have a specific use, you have that use plus all the other uses. He also stated that specific use for a cabinet shop is not allowed in C-2. Mr. Barfield made a motion to table this request until the next meeting until the City Attorney has a chance to direct us if we can pick and choose items in the industrial zoning and give the owner a chance to address this issue. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. The motion failed by a vote of 3-4 with Lueck, Marin, Collins and Miller voting against. Mr. Collins made the motion to deny PZ 91-11. This motion was seconded by Ms. Marin and the motion carried 4-3 with Brock, Bowen, and Barfield voting against denial. Mr. Bowen stated that his vote against denial was just to allow the requester to have a say. Public Hearing for request of Oscar Trevino Jr. with J.L. Steele, . to rezone Lots 1 & 2, Bloc eacham Addition, from th· resent classificat· R-2 Single Family Resid to C-2 Commercial. This erty is located on the west side of Smithfield Road between Guy Street and Arthur Drive. Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. .... , . EJl./' ;" ,I · . .. ~ , , I', ~ :ì1~t~~t~~~}:'~~~:~ ~~~~;J ;:~~:~~tf~i.· ~i~:" .. -~~ U J ;: 0 ,.~.. ..f...~:.... ~ ~ ë.i~ .." ~ lr~ ,::'J= ;:.- ~ (I; Q' ~ ~ ci I i~ j1~.;~~. ~ D: >-:> .,. ~ 11~ ~ ~ -. IOw·..q ~o t:Ja ~.' : '-. > : g \ ! ). rl 1 ~ ~ « ~ ~ t!s i' ., "" ..... /'I!.:.: _ . . ~ .,.~..." :I :.J ,} ~ i'¡: v-:. ::z \l' ~.... .! ~ :; ......." ...c( .c( ~... . r ~ .; _J -J > x ': .' .L· ~ ~ 0) --: ~ LoU' ~ ~:~ ~ 'J; .\ ¡ . ¡. ~ >- I- ~ .., ',.,~. I ..- M" d I ¿. ~ ~ · >~. h . I~~~~~~ :~r-~~, ~I'i Z~~:X:.w I Ij A'C:=O~ 0 _..~ ~ , ;~ " ~ ~I ~ t I L... ~ t..:..:. ""? :: :. ~ l',l- - \. . .... t- <- t'I' = CJ"'~~ ~~ · I! ! Ú ~~ :: - ': 'I' II I~ If~ ::: '~i I I : I ---- ..--.~ ~ ._.,;;:~ ! i .' " ~__~.- . I H.~.c;~';:-··:=~ ~l lL - -.."'.. ï1 . ..".... e ; . ~. , -..... '. ~.' .' ( :.~ .,--,. 1 , ,~t ""'~··~S ~ ,,:...,.1"." : ].g~¡ .\,. . a_wU'" . , ~. ~ ~~ r'~') :', " '. t' . "I~.~ ~ ~ \' " .' .'.. ~ .... '. . : n~l~~~D~~:·1::~··';~-:;!1 , \U.~ ...... t:. u .- ,,-.... .\, ~; ",~~,' r"'-' 1 , 5.C~rv ~I~ . .. _.~.. .... £uless,-1exas '( . -; ..- ;..u",,- '.. -E~___J '- I 'r') /4 I ,¿f,II ~ V '-"'. ! ;\ ~\ ..... .. . .' ...., 4,":'~;;. ~.. :. 9 /' .:; / i . , '-. '., I . . ~~"o~o/' ~'.', /~' " .I'" f .þ t.~1 ':J /",r' ~........ U .f ~:/.~(J /-/<' ,:--..:~- -:p '2. ,4S~;~~~~ 7' S r" 'Ý ¡" . r? c, 'øJ/~1 7 .J' ~ · ,.~ .-.-...;J - --~-----'..(..--, II '\.. I h ".;r.:- ~ I I ~ ~t.t~/,t" R . I ~ I ¿M,¿O tt I (.;s~ .A ,~~ .~:) , 1~ ... ~' ~ J~ N~ r~ fr~ IltJ~' I S ,!! ~ ~ n~ d ~ i' '~ 0. .~¡; (,Ì) "~J i Ii 0 ~ I' ¡ J ~.,'J ,l'. ~. d I\J J I ¡i t'l $ ,,") !j I ! ~\' :; J j) ~ I -J f\) ...I'~' 'i I UJ ' 1:(;' ~ ( II £ 5 \.1/ ~ I~ J j " I ¡ I ÌJ) ~~ · i~ I~ I if , Ii! . f ,II fÏ . j ¡ Ie"', t· \. 1 f L~~':.::4~~:?·-;'!:?r:. ).j'~.~~~~.. ~_~:.:..:~. I -. .,' .J ..'~ r I L ~ r i' ¿<:;·1.:1, .:::- ¡ ___ _--.'4 - - ___I ( (7-/ ,~' /~/ C· 014,/ '.:J'-.:J HE "-,." \(. Q r\";~' C ~',AI fI! T'1 'J ,.. ~ :~ 't. ~ " r ,. &. "I 't('f~ 3...\~ \}....., S~~ \.> ~,.~.. ~ .\:~ ' ~.\ ~ ~ . . .. .. I' ) .. , : ... r ."." ,.1"1' ..'~.. ~ . .~ -:'.~ ~ : ::'. : :: ~.::: ~.; ;.~; . ~;oj ;:! :,:: . .-,..\ .. ·!:!'··~·.·I~:· .'f..<::;~ ? . ..;;~;~t~;:· . ~,. '. ~:. . .O:\~ :¡>~~~~;! :. , '.. ,,' '-il" f I. 0' :..~'~: o· ~~ :~:¡~~ j ~ .- . ... ! t ... :...:::~~:{~ < ¡ :. ~:'1 · , . #.. ~ ~~'o:}\2~4'; h .., '\"¡.. .~ ... t~ ~'.. ¡' :1" .... . ~ . ,:1 ..~ p : .'\};:~\',.?~~\ ~ ,.. I' '9-.. ." ~: : /; ::i~;.:·l: ., ,', .~,~ " .. :, ( '~,. \ ," " \ ,; }ii~~?~!: :::o:~~~~;~} . -. I . ". ') . ;'. .r. ~. . ;... ..... , : .~r., .i¡ . r . -,' ~ ~ i '.:''i.. ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ .t~ Q ~ \) $"1." ~\-:-,--., ! ,;~-- t '-"J q ~) : :1 " , ' \ .' . ; ; ~,~ ~L ! -- ~! rJ j : ...,:~ ~ .." ~ L_¿~__ (.') ,~ ~ '\ ~~ .... ~'. (~ " \ {,., '-"\ \':, ~, ~·u .., . , ~ ~. ('~ I -. . 'I VeJ! ~ . ~ I : I ~) , I ~ ~) : ~ ~ I \)1 ~ I ~ I J S"J.r 7l?/-ïC T 7 . . ..". ~ ~ i , ~. ~ ... .111. III. . ',.' ~. ': . ~.:. i ~::..:~' \ .' .:~ ., ".: ,'~ ,. .~ } -, ~.. \ " ~F.',; ,. , ',,' ,. :~.~ . , c' : ~ . -I!J'~:~ Pl~J~1? O:! · . ~~. .: ~ '.~. 'l"r~"'..CT 7 ~ Of! JOZ{ZJ 0 r; .~':;:.;!~O!j I .,A I' ~ECOND Frz,IK3 ø TD rzz;:j CZ'¡ò'l .....~t'~:·:t r\ '7 )...~..~~.~.,..J r'''-r''''i{ 1À 1\"-':'" t~r.-:~ f n .> :. u .. .. \~ ~.;. 4. L .. .... L \.. ¿',: .~..... 4 W .~.;;...;;....~ ~ . ~ . '.' .. ! : CO~,"".",....~, "i""=-~"'..". ('" '\~~"'.~r:-"'<!"'.~~ r e. ;~ "i'.'\Rru~rJ"L' Ult" J. À ø .. ¿'..;J.~:> ~n..-r"',,"~"":'''...uI .. :i.: ,,_,'0 P! ~.~..T ,.,r":~O":')·;Y1T"\ ~,'t ~ ~.....'1 ,,~'\ ~7":- ,.~ · .~~ - ,! __ _ A'...,.. ~WJ""~ 4*4.J V\;.~,,-!·:....... .-.. 3Sa-"I~... I'';~.G~~ ::;..".~ r:';3I~ :-:~'.:.~,)~..:l::~~. '!' ..... " ....~:~ 'r~!~p~:J·~T C(''':,.¡i.~-i:·«¡ ~ '1~=~.:.-..;~,,:-_--- ._--~.;:'~.:': ~I·..f :~~f;;~ e ORDINANCE NO. 1747 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-91-11 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-2 to 1-2. BEING Tract 7, John's Addition, Second Filing, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-79, Page 32, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard, south of the railroad. 4IÞ DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF MAY, 1991. ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-91-11 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: e ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Community Development 7/8/91 Department: Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing for Consideration of an Amendment to PZ 91-15 Agenda Number: Subject: Zoning Ordinance #1080 Regarding Day Care Centers and Kindergartens in U-Institutional Zone Ordinance #1749 Attached is a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Day Care Centers. The proposed Ordinance if approved will allow a Day Care Center/Kindergarten to be an allowed use in the U-Institutional Zoning District. Presently, many churches and private schools operate day care facilities. However, the Zoning Ordinance does not allow this use in the U-Institutional zone. It seems appropriate to add the Day Care Center/Kindergarten use to this zone since many of the same physical characteristics exists for day care centers as do churches and private schools. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of this amendment at their June 13th meeting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available - ,; (( V~ ment Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director P A 1 nf e 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1749 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE 1080 , THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ALLOW A DAY CARE/KINDERGARTEN AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE nUn ( INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning commission of the ci ty of North Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the Comprehensive zoning Ordinance, by changing the said ordinance as set forth herein. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Section 18.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to add the following: 4IÞ 18.2.8 Day Care/Kindergarten 2. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidi ty or unconsti tutionali ty shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. e e e 2 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as provided by the North Richland Hills Charter and the laws of the state of Texas. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS ~ DAY OF JUNE 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 1991 DAY OF MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY Page 2 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1991 e Chairman Brock asked if the sign a covenant regardin sign a said they are satisfied with the comments, but was a little unhappy with the wording of the last sentence in item 3. Mr. Joslin said covenant. PS 91-09 APPROVED Mr. Collins m e the motion to approve PS 91-09 sect to the Engineer's comments This motion was seconded by Mr. Bo n and the motion carried 5-0. 2. PZ 91-14 C sider request of the City to rezone locks 1 through 4, Woodland Oaks Addition, from the present classification of R-2 (Single Family Residential) to R-2 2300. This subdivision is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road, north of Martin Drive. e Chairman Brock stated they had the Public Hearing on this request at the last P & Z meeting, tabled it, and now brought it back tonight for a decision. Mr. Miller made the motion to deny PZ 91-14. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion to deny carried 4-1 with Ms. Marin voting against denial. 3. PZ 91-15 Public Hearing to consider an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 to allow Day Care Centers/Kindergartens in the U-Institutional Zoning District. Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this amendment to please come forward. e Page 3 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1991 e PZ 91-15 APPROVED 4. PZ 91-09 e There being no one, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this amendment to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen said he felt this was something they had just overlooked and think it is a good thing to correct it. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 91-15. This motion was seconded by Mr. Miller and the motion carried 5-0. Public Hearing to consider an amendment to Zoning Ordinance regarding Carnivals and other events. Chairman Brock said the Co sion has taken a long hard look a is, Mr. LeBaron has checked w· several other cities to see how t handle carnivals and sp al events, and now has prepared ordinance which reads as follows: Carnivals, circuses and special d raising events sponsored by a ic entity, civic or non rofit organization located within City may be held for a period not exceeding seven days on an open site containing at least six acres in any non-residential zoning district, provided that adequate parking and sanitary facilities are made available to the satisfaction of the Building Official. There shall be at least 180 days between subsequent events at the same location and/or by the same sponsor. No reduction in any minimum zoning requirement shall be affected by such activity. To protect nearby residents, the Building Official shall establish the terms and conditions for the temporary use at the time of approval." e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .epartment: Subject: Administration Council Meeting Date: 7/8/91 Appointments to the Charter ReV1Slon Commission (1991) - Resolution No. 91-23 Agenda Number: GN 91-90 (Tabled at the June 24, 1991 Meetlng) At the Pre-Council Meeting June 10, 1991, Mayor Brown asked that each Council member make an appointment to the Charter Revision Commission. State law requires at least fifteen members. The attached resolution contains the revised proposed appointees. RecolDIDendation: It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 91-23. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget Other _ a~JL/Z ~) F - - Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I Finance Director Page 1 of e e e RESOLUTION NO. 91-23 WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is necessary to review the City Charter for possible changes, additions and corrections; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that a Charter Revision Commission should be appointed to study the Charter and make recommendations to the Council and the citizens regarding any changes, additions or corrections. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. A Charter Revision Commission (1991) be and is hereby established. 2. The following person are appointed as members of such Commission: Richard Davis, Chairman Bob Marks Denny Stout H.O. Lochridge Charles Brinkley Dell Herod Steve Dunkelberg Bill Feniken Lee Pitts Dennis Horvath Clint Blackmon Sherry Christensen Tom Duer George Pederson Gary Cope e Resolution No. 91-23 Page 2 3. The Commission is directed to hold such meetings and conduct such investigations as it deems proper in making recommendations for City Charter changes. It is further ordered to report its findings and recommendations to the City Council at the earliest practical date. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 8th day of July, 1991. APPROVED: Mayor ATfEST: e City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: 'Pnh li c Works _ Council Meeting Date: 7 /08/91 Basketball Goals and other Obstructions or Hazards Subject: in tnp ~trp~t Fi g'ht_-Qf-Way - Qrdinance No. 1743 Agenda Number: GN 91-92 II The Public Works Department and Community Development Department have received several complaints concerning basketball goals within the street right-of-way. staff has handled these complaints by appealing to the property owner's sense of public safety and concern for possible liability should someone be hurt using the goal. Until recently, this has worked and the property owner would remove the goal. Based on our current ordinances, we do not have the clear direct authority to have the resident remove the basketball goal. The attached ordinance was composed by the Attorney for the City at the request of the Public Works and Community Development Departments. The staff believes this ordinance will give us the needed clear authority to request removal of any item within the street right-of-way which may pose a traffic hazard or create an attractive nuisance along the City's streets. The staff has also provided a list of existing basketball goals which will be effected by the passage of this ordinance. staff has not contacted the owners of these goals because we have not received any complaints. However, the staff recommends all existing basketball goals be removed should Council elect to pass this ordinance. Recommendation: 4IÞ It is recommended that City Council take action on Ordinance No. 1743. N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _. Operating Budget ., Oth nt Head Signature ,u ¡e!16~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fenance Director Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS est of Existing Basketball Goals in Street ROW ne 18, 1991 Address -------------~--------------- 7940 Arlie Lane 6909 Aston Drive 6737 Bartay Drive 7708 Briar Cliff Court 7709 Briarridge Court 8402 Brookview Drive 5917 Cynthia Court 6913 Daniel Court 3812 Diamond Loch E 4020 Diamond Loch E 3809 Diamond Loch W 6424 Diamond Lock N 7704 Evergreen Ave. 7713 Frankie B Street 6884 Greenleaf Dr. 4808 Grove Street 8025 Hunter Lane 6512 Jerry Court 7808 Johnson Court 7948 Kandy Lane e 4412 Keeter Drive 5808 Kilarney Court 7023 Lincoln Drive 7308 Moody Court 7808 Odell Street 6204 Onyx Dr. N. 6516 Paula Court 7633 Perkins Drive 7301 Post Oak Drive 7800 Red Oak Lane 7812 Redwood Court 6856 Richfield Drive 7316 Rockdale Court 7709 Rolling Ridge Court 6509 Scarborough Place 5409 Scott Drive 6801 Shady Dale Drive 7413 Shady Hollow Lane 8400 Springbrooke Court 6816 Still Meadows Cir. N 7128 Sweetbriar Court 8958 Tamiami Court 7528 Teakwood Court 7449 Timberhill Drive 5521 Topper Corut e 5801 Ulster Drive 7254 Windcrest Court 7205 Windcrest Court E e e e ORDINANCE NO. 1743 WHEREAS, the erection and/or maintenance of fences, poles, basketball goals, skate board ramps and other structures in the City right-of-way constitute a danger to the public; and WHEREAS, the erection and/or maintenance of fences, poles, basketball goals, skate board ramps and other structures in the City right-of-way constitute obstructions which interfere with access to the public right-of-way and public utilities placed therein; and WHEREAS, the erection and/or maintenance of a pole, basketball goal or skate board ramp in the public right-of-way in close proximity to the traveled portion of the street constitute attractive nuisances for children which cause a danger to children who congregate or play in or near the traveled portion of the public streets. NOW, THEREFORE, in order to protect the health and safety of the citizens of the city and to give unimpeded access to public utilities, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas does hereby ordain: 1 . That it shall hereafter be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect or maintain a fence, pole, basketball goal, skate board ramp or other structure within the public right-of- way. 2. The erection and/or maintenance of a pole, basketball goal or skate board ramp in a public right of way adjacent to the traveled portion of a public street or within ten feet of a traveled portion of a public street is hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall hereafter be unlawful. 3. Any person, firm or corporation which violates any portion of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not in excess of $200.00. Each day of violation shall be a separate offense. 4 . In addition to the criminal penalty set forth in Section 3, the person, firm or corporation which is in violation of this ordinance may be given notice by the Director of Public Works of the City to remove such fence, pole, basketball goal, skate board ramp or other structure and the said Director of Public Works e e e shall be, and is hereby, empowered to remove such fence, pole, basketball goal, skate board ramp or other structure if it is not removed by the violator within 10 days of such notice. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1991. APPROVED: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Subject: Appointments to Board of Appeals Council Meeting Date: 7 /8/91 Agenda Number:GN 91-93 Department: Administration Mr. Joe Crane has resigned from the Board of Appeals. Mr. Michael Dean, Alternate, has been recommended to fill the vacancy and Mr. Perry Christensen as Alternate. Reco_ndation: It is recommended that City Council appoint Mr. Michael Dean as voting member, Place 3 and Mr. Perry Christensen as Alternate (Place 2). Finance Review e Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other /l ~ ~~ \ Ú.;~../, tJ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Ie I)/(~~ City Manager I Finance Director Pa e 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _epartment: Administration Council Meeting Date: 7/8{91 Subject: Appointments to Park and Recreation Board Agenda Number: GN 91-95 Mr. Ron Parks (Place 1) has moved to Haltom City creating a vacancy on the Park and Recreation Board. It has been recommended that Ms. Karen Allen (Alternate) be appointed to Place 1 and Mr. David Allen be appointed as Alternate. Reco_ndation: It is recommended that Ms. Karen Allen be appointed to Place 1 and Mr. David Allen be appointed as Alternate. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~$/ ~.nL/:) Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM - Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available - ¡(~~~ City Manager , Finance Director Pace 1 of · . · CC(Q)~Y e Date Réceived: Received By: .~ 4..-/-41 "-- ~ ./ ð PROFILE FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS ¡) a v , 'c/ b;.6 S' 0 " .4 / I ~ ÞI ADDRESS 7/33 /J1eq~... ~,..,I:. ¡Jr.',,#: EMPLOYER 5' e 1..f'.~.IN ~ e/' E, NAME ,.,¡~ /Kr#A -I- Á C-e",+/ -f-,/r/ e~",:5 ~"'s-f-".vc 'I.~ #¡tv NUMBER OF YEARS /0/2. OCCUPATION PHONE: HOME /118 f",o '7 9 9 - .s-.3 f7 W~FE'S/HUSBAND'S NAME ~~ CHILDREN'S NAME AND AGES /.V~ OFFICE RESIDENT OF THE CITY SINCE A ¿!//'()A'. /9bO r PREVIOUS RESIDENCE 13/ Vð /!?OV4/ h e.q,. $9 q /h.:;>Þ1/ -' I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING~ON: (CHECK ONE OR MORE) PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION / PARKS/.RECREATION BOARD BOARD OF APPEALS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION LIBRARY BOARD BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE AND PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE ON CITY COt4MISSION: CABLE TV BOARD t/slT c;,~.,. f,· -I! e eJ e rl ~ 1+'1 t:;, ÞIt ¿ /J,e, (/5T/1 r:rA" #/!/( ~ -r/9£ ø / / COMMENT (ABOUT YOURSELF, SPECIAL AREAS OF INTEREST, WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE, QUALIFICATIONS AND OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION.) G"Q/v~r~ tP.,ð ¡(;c..1. ?....¿ f/.re ~. /9 ~z. /i,~ ~..~e."'S;T" o-fl ~-!:.$ / / ' #f'-r ; 76 /1 ... 4~ ~ ~"n/s n r-A~~,'q-.rr #v ,/-,L¿' Q¿.., tire.",,// ,ðe,el r#vIJ,/"~ é? 1'1",,'5 (!)r'4 4""'.z..,~;,~ /11>0 z: Pi+1 t/e1""7 ;~r.~r:.~re//I? f,...,/r-ð v.:~ V/ð.... -1'1, e..- C ;-f-'7 ~ I ¿¡ /r¡::.¡q/;t Cjt?o/) ~vª /;r7 ¿,~ L ;v/;,7 e. 'Lj ð,>' <::.~ ;7 ~l/~ /( ~ f,'¿",T5'. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _Department: Parks & Recreation Department Subject: Dan Echols Senior Adult Center Council Meeting Date: 07 /08/91 Agenda Number: GN 91-96 The "Dan Echols Senior Adult Center", 6801 Glenview Drive is nearing completion and is scheduled to open on August 5, 1991. The City is finalizing a contract with Senior citizen Services of Greater Tarrant County for a staff ·person for the facility. The "move-in" supplies and furnishings are budgeted at $12,145 and the salary for a center director of August/September will be approximately $3,000. FUNDING SOURCE: Funds for "move-in" items (supplies, office equipment, tables, chairs, furnis~ings, etc.) were included in the proposed FY 1991-92 budget. Purchase of these items at this time will preclude the use of those. funds in next year's proposed budget. Funds may be allocated from: 01-99-01-5970 Budget Reserve for contingency $ 15,145.00 To: Senior Adult Services 01-70-04-2900 ._ 01-70-04-4800 01-70-04-6500 "Move-In" Supplies Special services (Center Director) Office Equipment and Furniture $ $ $ 9,792.00 3,000.00 2,353.00 RECOMMENDATION: It is requested the City Council appropriate funds as indicated above for "move-in" and operation of the "Dan Echols Senior Adult Center" for the remainder of this fiscal year, starting August 5, 1991 - September 31, 1991. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available _ Operating Budget _ _ Other "!:: ,_" -! ~. ~~~ dJ~ Department Head Signature y ~ Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance DIrector Page 1 of , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: eSUbject: Publ ic Works _ Council Meeting Date: 7/08/91 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way from Robert and Gloria Hesch for the Proposed Construction of Agenda Number: ~u 91-20 Bursey Road (Parcel #11) The staff has negotiated with Robert and Gloria Hesch to purchase right-of-way from their land that fronts on Bursey Road. The negotiated price is $2,061.60 equaling $0.60 a square foot for property that is zoned AG. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of payment for right-of-way on Bursey Road to Robert and Gloria Hesch in the amount of $2,061.60. e Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Oper i g Budget WOth GO Finance Review Acct. Number 13-15-89-6000 Funds Available . Ftnance Director nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of 1 .", / CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS RIGHT-OF-WAY _ STA't'E OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT That we, Robert L. Hesch and wife, Gloria D. Hesch, as Sellers, for and in consideration of the agreed purchase price of Two Thousand Sixty-One and 60/100 Dollars ($2,061.60), and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof, hereby grant, sell and convey to the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Texas as Buyer, a perpetual right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, improving, widening, maintaining and using a public street with drainage facilities as may be required and the further rights to construct, improve, operate and maintain water, sewer, or other public utilities in, under or upon said right-of-way, as described on the plat attached hereto, which plat is made a part hereof, and/or described as follows: (SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION) The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special conditions, if any: 1. City agrees to move water meter to front of Seller1s property. 2. City agrees to build separate concrete drive approach into Seller's property, at no cost to Seller, l2-feet wide by 10-feet deep. To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its successors and assigns forever. Executed this the 10 ~~ day of June, A.D., 1991. _ /?d'~ ?-;;/~ Robert L. Hesch ~f)~eL/ Gloria D. Hesch ADDRESS OF GRANTEE: city of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT This instrument was acknowledged before me on ~ð ei day of June, 1991 by Robert L. Hesch and wife, Gloria D. Hesch. NoJ~li! st~as My Commission Expires: Notary's Printed Name: 4-22-98 Mark D. Bradlev _ t CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _Department: Subject: Public Works Council Meeting Date: : /08/91 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way from Eddie and Doris Warren for the Proposed Construction Agenda Number: PU 91-21 of Bursey Road (Parcel #12) The staff has negotiated with Eddie and Doris Warren to purchase right-of-way from their land that fronts on Bursey Road. The negotiated price is $2,380.80 equaling $0.60 a square foot for property that is zoned AG. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of payment for right-of-way on Bursey Road to Eddie and Doris Warren in the amount of $2,380.80. e Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget ., Oth GO . Finance Director ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM .~~ City Manager 1 Page 1 of .,/ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS RIGHT-OF-WAY _ STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT That we, Eddie L. Warren and wife, Doris J. Warren, as Sellers, for and in consideration of the agreed purchase price of Two Thousand Three Hundred Eighty and 80/100 Dollars ($2,380.80), and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof, hereby grant, sell and convey to the city of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Texas as Buyer, a perpetual right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, improving, widening, maintaining and using a public street with drainage facilities as may be required and the further rights to construct, improve, operate and maintain water, sewer, or other public utilities in, under or upon said right-of-way, as described on the plat attached hereto, which plat is made a part hereof, and/or described as follows: (SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION) The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special conditions, if any: 1. City agrees to move water meter to front of Seller's property. 2. City agrees to build separate concrete drive approach into Seller's property, at no cost to Seller, l2-feet wide by la-feet deep. To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its successors and assigns forever. Executed this the ~~ day of June, A.D., 1991. _ ~J, rX.-4'(2 A__ Eddie L. Warren ¿,..~-'( ~~/gM14~~ Iior is J. rren SELLERS ADDRESS OF GRANTEE: City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT This instrument was acknowledged before me on ~ ti day of June, 1991 by Eddie L. Warren and wife, Doris J. Warren. ~I·./~...*·;;¡:~p..·\.,. ~ U:~~~~ o. BRADLEY ~.~\ '. :,,1 "", :-,·:·.\t'.~ S8IOH EXPJRfS i:.· .....~~~.:.: /~!;rll 1M 1... " ...~........ ..., .... Commission Expl.r ":" .-:- ,.~~, ~-:-..;.~ No7::;~l¿ tt~xas My Notary's Printed Name: 4-22-98 Mark D. Bradley _ _ _ _ BURsEY ROAD ~~ i æ o ~t )&... 'j~ ta I .. U~ ~~ U. I'ð .CL J - ~~ ta1~ 8J Œ.g CEN'E~,=,INe. E--, STING, F/!/ttICE,D ".0. w. -r----__ RO. B. · ..-- E".,.-r. ~ .~ "2~ 0, ~O "2 'i~ ~'),.¡: t4 .1 e! a~ a. '2 ~ - 8>: 10 1úl= O.J . -tS ~ -=~~ Š<:I-- ft"\ I ~ \oU ~ ,.. --j J 1--0 3~~ f:Þ ~op 0 5 E P R.o.vV. \..J Nt!.. e;' T!!Mf=ÐIe~ E.sM'T: ,}~ .~IS Õ ~ en .\1J~ -~t õ . o o 'Z. J E þ I:) '!!... \-Y foJ N ......., A R ¡;t.e..,... ET u)( gOR t S vO L· '-+-<"WCl, P6. \ tøZ , ORTc::.:r JOHN Ä-3\o . CONO~A SURVE.Y w .- '~'. L~, &;k : / ,"ch :: 40 ~-I- ,. :t:.:-:'.: ~~ iTcr. ALL '~'1 t ndt ,_ er t ~ 1 r. r r ¡:h.. ~ _·,t· U2 ,..: \,~ : ':. ¡ ~ :,,1d ~-: ¡ t l.la t ed 1 n t he JOHN CONDRA SURVEY. 'O;::.t(~I-:-t- t-.....'. ~'j('... i~('( ~r,T. I __'.n~;·.. rc::."d.~ ~nc1 ~einq a pClrtion of the trrlct deSCYlt~d 'n . 'I€-; det-?d ,',' r:jdlf.;- L~...nn ~~.~("rRn etu:-t. DOY1S Jean recorded in lv',:. 1 ume ..1 E. 5b , F'=-\ge 1 ~:: :.f the O~f?d ~'ec:,=-Yds, Têu"yant County, Te)~a& ë\na ~T"~.lr'e par t 1" ul-?r' l./ r:,=,SI:'::('! l,,~'j b'.' f..~'te~ ~nd hi'. ,Jnds as follows: BeginnIng at I..~ (-'SJ~ -=:.·rl ·-:t~2·,~=·1 West b,:aunddr y 1 i ne "f sa 1 d JJar'"r en sa i d t, r =,..:. t b e a y s ~. J ':' r t r r.' 0 ~ e (.J ,,- ~ (' c: " , '.1 ? 1", ~:'\Îh p ~~ I~ . In I:' a ~ s U Y" V . i n c .:> i nth e tYac~ f~om wh1ch the Northwest corney of :-, 1 ,n i nu t es 3'3 see onds East 6. 00 f.eet; r1 e q (' e e S 't tin J nut; e s ,:1 f I..... a !' !:.. ne ':-' t 8ur'" 3f?:1 , . -',,, - -1 P Ú ~ r~ :. ,.. e ~ 1 ", ~ I j East w1 th the ex 1St ing Y~rl~ble width right of .. I ~ f::' a k c; u Y" V . i n c .) i nth e Thence South 8S fenced SQuth rlQht way.J 230. f:, 2 f ~ ~ t :~ East bl:lunda( ì ~ n~ se.: 1:,nd5 f;' .:. èI. d r a ~tamped ',' f -:¡ -:- 1.-4 ~.., r- r L:.r-I +~" ¡'I: t ; fherl'- .=; :-: ¡ ILl t h b I:' u n d "1 (" l l;\ '-? in c . 'I :. r: t; h ~ _ ,..:.,:, ..:. I I I 1 '7~ W ~- ~ '~ 0 t ~ t;he ::'~.lrj E..~st ~t Jmoed I moak: surv. SUr" ~ey Rc,ad and a t· u u .:--: ü - t t? E:- ¡ r:, .:-.1 1. . ..,I. ::\ :"_'l-,t:)~r t \. ". 1 gr t ,- t l.,Jat ',I l 1 ne 1:1 t ~'-:- ':'D'-'~I:Jd C Ll r vet I~' ~-: -, ;:=. ~ t._ . t' : Then,: e '..J 1 t h ".lîe h a v i n 9 (~ ¡- -~·1 .. :_I:.~ see ü n d '.:~ . .:::;.:: m 1 n 1.1 ( t:? S ( m ü 6 ~ :: ,_ tl'- . 4".,1 a y 1 ~ Il @ and .: U yo vet 0 the 1 eft ,~¡-,qle ·-:,f 7 degrees 53 tnlnutes 47 .~ l ,".!r) '1 ':. 'ì ;:-,,' f-j I:' f f'J·Yf' t M 85 degye@s .;1 ",, .~·pped st eel r-,:,d st amped : ~ . oj C ;- . ~I P . ~ r..;. e':1 -:'.-t('.'. t.~~t~. r 1 ~ h +; <I f ,~ '.: ·.:on ,.. r ~ 1 , .: ~ t " ~ì j . ~ ~." ' "I , .' ... . . .., . ,4 -." I '.; '"? t 1-. :-1 , . ,. ... -j : Then,: c ",~.-_,.-;: .3'~ P Y" I:. pc:.:=. ¿. (J1(, 1. a h t "t ( in 0 d ~. = 1_ \ . '": e ~ <..,r· c ::. ;..Jes t .-:: ·:.n t 1 n Lilli 9 '.,J 1 t h sa i d to: .-:-. d l:'::" :- apped s t 2~.!1 (" c,d st amped ~ '..', ~~ . f' -; ¿; 1 d ;....J d r .... en t Y' a·: t : . . ~ . ~J .) r r ~ ~ ~:- . ,¡ J. ;- t , '- - '.j ~.' ,1 :-,~ t ._8. ~7 ~::::.(~t: - . i = ,·lt~ S t ~ ; ,~ : 1 -1"- ,. Then.: e ì JI)Y t h oJ\"' 1 ine 1 ~. 83 fpE:-t 1 and. rr: c ( ~::. ."1 r ~. ,.ì¡ ,::ìnu"tp:; '";3 se,-,:,nds West '..Jlth '~alc1 West :·;l.?..::e ..::·t beg\nnlna and ':c,ntaln1ng Ü.0911 bûundary Acres of jegr'e~s t . _. ~ h r: DAVID C. MOAK SURVEyD/tS, INC. R£8ISTER£D PU.LIC SURVEYOR P.O. BOX 1054 2.8- 2211 HURST, T£XAS DATE (ø-U- I ~9 / .... 8iøÞ-S.Ÿ!J-/Z t.. ,- ~3 ¥ . ~. '-'. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Parks & Recreation Department ~Ubject: Park Liqhting Pro; ect Council Meeting Date: 07 / 08 / 91 Agenda Number:PU 91-22 Bids for the Richfield Park Sports Lighting System Project were opened on June 28, 1991. The following base bids were submitted: ComDany Base Bid NEMA 3 Electric, Inc. Dean Electric, Inc. Barrow Electric, Inc. $194,949 $197,900 $273,798 The base bid includes sports lighting and security lighting for all six baseball/T-Ball fields, two (2) football/soccer fields, tennis courts and the basketball courts. Reusable poles and fixtures will be reconditioned and installed on the tennis courts, basketball courts, and for security lights at Norich Park. NEMA 3 Electric, Inc. was the low bidder with a bid of $194,949. NEMA 3 Electric, Inc. has an excellent track record in sportslighting installations throughout the North Texas area and was the contractor for the Fossil Creek Park sportslighting installation last year in North Richland Hills. ~The attached project summary discusses in some detail the cost savings ~opportunities of proceeding with the entire project at this time as . proposed by Staff. FUNDING SOURCE: The City Council appropriated $218,900 for the renovation and replacement of the existing light systems at Richfield and Norich Parks on April 8, 1991 (GN 91-53). There is currently a balance of $210,645 after engineering, inspection, and design fees in account #01-99-00-6500 which will be adequate for the following expenses: Sportslighting Installation Project/Construction Management (Architect) Reconditioning of Existing Poles Best Key Switch and Lock System Project Sub-Total Account Balance (Contingency) $194,949 $ 3,300 $ 1,500 S 1.000 $200,749 $ 9,894 Finance Review ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~ Operating Budget ~ Other _____ -~~~~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K:V~ , City Manager . Fenance Director Page 1 of CITY OF I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS · _RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council award the park lighting project contract to NEMA 3 Electric, Inc. in the base bid amount of $194,949. ATTACHMENT: Park Lighting Project Summary e e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page of · RICHFIELD PARX SPORTSLIGHTING PROJECT SUMMARY BACKGROUND The existing lighting system at Richfield Park was originally installed, with "shop-fabricated" non-galvanized steel poles, by Public Works personnel in the mid-1970's. Since 1985 there have been two (2) structural failures due to a combination of internal rust, wind stress or metal fatigue. The pole failure in 1985 resulted in six (6) new sportslighting poles being installed to replace the fallen pole and five (5) other poles of questionable integrity at that time. The most recent pole failure was in March, 1990. The RYA sponsors and programs sports leagues in baseball and football at Richfield Park. Approximately 1800 youth participated in this year's sports programs. e In March, 1991 the Parks and Recreation Department conducted an inspection of the light poles in all city parks at the request of the City Manager's Office. The inspection resulted in the observance of rust accumulation on the interior of the poles, weld separations and the discovery of two (2) significant cracks (approximately eight inches [8"]) on two (2) of the poles. The City Council, on April 8, 1991, authorized the replacement of the existing lighting systems and appropriated $218,900 for project construction costs. The Council also authorized staff to hire a structural engineer to evaluate the condition of the poles. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S INSPECTION staff contracted Frank W. Neal & Associates, Inc. to conduct a structural engineering assessment of the existing poles and bases. According to Mr. Neal, 75% (18 of 24) of the existing poles around the ballfields have "experienced sianificant deterioration and their structural integrity is questionable and warrants replacement". The six (6) which were replaced in 1985 proved to be structurally adequate for re-use given that their height and fixture-bearing capacity could be incorporated into the proposed sportslighting system design. The structural engineer's assessment also showed the light poles on the tennis courts to be adequate for supporting the existina fixtures (one per pole -- see the following discussion of light levels) but not adequate to support the additional fixtures necessary for raising the light e levels to appropriate standards. ~ LIGHT LEVEL TESTING AND ILLUMINATION STANDARDS In addition to evaluating the structural safety of the poles, the Staff coordinated a light level test to address a second area of liability concern. Inadequate illumination can be very dangerous in sports situations that involve high velocity projectiles, as is the case in baseball. The amount of light we currently have on the baseball fields ranges from 40% - 70% below the minimum acceptable standard. In addition to not having an adequate amount of light, we also have a problem with the uniformity of light distribution and glare caused by poles that are too short for the size of the fields that they are intended to illuminate. These fields also have poor quality of light due to two separate types of fixtures, metal halide and quartz, being indiscriminately distributed throughout the sports complex. e The tennis courts are currently 87% below the minimum acceptable light level standard. Light level readings were at four (4) foot/candles in comparison to the minimum standards of 30 foot/candles. The poles on the tennis courts are in good shape and are the appropriate height. However, for the light level to meet the minimum standard of 30 foot/candles, it will be necessary to add additional metal halide fixtures and eliminate the existing quartz fixtures. The existing poles are not of sufficient diameter to support the necessary crossarm configuration for the additional fixtures. A very cost-effective solution for proper lighting of the tennis courts and basketball courts will be discussed later in this report. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The Staff met with sportslighting contractors, consultants, manufacturer's representatives, engineers and youth sports representative in order to research and evaluate the most cost effective approach to completing this project. Staff contracted with Bland Harper to serve as architect and project manager. The project specifications were prepared with the following goals and directives: e Safety - A mandate was established to address safety concerns as the top priority in the design of the new sportslighting system. The replacement poles must meet a 15 year warranty criteria and have a minimum wind loading capacity of 80 MPH with a 1.3 gust factor. The maintained light levels will also meet 100% of the minimum acceptable light levels. The poles and fixtures are specified at the appropriate heights and with glare reduction features to create a safely illuminated play environment for the users of these facilities. - - . Economical Design - The new sportslighting system maX1m1zes "pole sharing" opportunities between fields thereby reducing costs. The new system calls for nineteen new poles to illuminate eight sports fields. That is in contrast to the existing 24 poles that currently only illuminate six (6) fields. We are able, with this design, to light two additional fields with five (5) fewer poles. The net result is better light, both in quantity and quality, with fewer poles, fixtures and associated costs. The average cost for installation of each pole with fixtures and electrical is $9,000 _ $10,000. (By eliminating five [5] poles through design improvement a total savings can be estimated at $45,000 - $50,000.) Maximum use of Existing Equipment - The structural engineer's evaluation of the existing poles verified that the six (6) replacement poles from 1985 were in good condition and provide the opportunity for continued use. These (6) poles are currently located on the two (2) largest baseball fields. Unfortunately, these poles are not the appropriate height or in the correct locations to be used for relighting the baseball fields. However, they are the correct height and have the fixture bearing capacity to light the tennis and basketball courts at the appropriate levels. The contractor will remove these poles and we will have them sand blasted, inspected and "powder-coated" prior to re- installing them on the tennis and basketball courts. The best existing metal halide fixtures will be removed, cleaned and reassembled for reuse on these facilities. other fixtures will be kept for replacement parts or for use on future projects. The existing tennis court poles can also be cleaned and reconditioned for reuse at Norich Park. Since the security lighting at that park will require only one fixture per pole. The estimated cost savings for the City by reusing and reconditioning this existing equipment should be between $15,000 _ $20,000. Special Features - The specifications call for fixtures and system designs that will eliminate spill and glare concerns. This will prevent the park lighting from being a nuisance to the surrounding neighborhoods. The specifications also call for remote ballasts on the new poles. This reduces our long term maintenance cost by placing ballasts and fuses at 10 feet instead of at 50 - 70 feet above ground. Maintenance costs for renting lift trucks would be greatly reduced. Construction Schedule - In order to minimize the City's exposure to the liability of unsafe structures and inadequate light levels, the base bid requires a completion date of October 1, 1991. Completion by this date would also have the least detrimental effect on the primary user's, the Richland Youth Association, fall youth football schedule. ~ RELATIONSHIP TO THE PARKS MASTER PLAN Renovation of the sportslighting system is Richfield Park is recommended in Chapter V. "Conclusions", p. 65 under Renovation In Existina Parks. This project is also in accordance with the policy statement goals adopted by Council as part of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Goal Number 3 states: "The Parks and Recreation Department will ensure that facilities are maintained both for the safety of the public and also to ensure the longevity of the facilities." (p. 126) BASE BID AND DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATES The base bid includes new sportslighting for four (4) baseball fields, two (2) football fields and two (2) "T-Ball" fields. Basketball courts and tennis courts will be illuminated with approved reusable poles and fixtures currently in existence. Security lighting between facilities and on parking areas is included. A completion date of October 1, 1991 are included in the base bid. ~ Deductive Alternate #1: Eliminate Tennis Court Liqhtinq (Subtract $5,786) - The poles on the tennis courts are structurally sound but cannot support the additional fixtures necessary to increase the light levels to the minimum standard. By reusing existing poles and fixtures from the baseball fields we can provide the appropriate level of light at a significant savings of $8,214 compared to the cost of this work as a separate project. Deductive Alternate #2: Eliminate Basketball Court Lighting (Subtract $4,092) - The basketball courts are currently not lighted. However, the high frequency of participant uses and lack of lighted outdoor basketball courts make this alternate a viable park improvement opportunity in the context of this project. Reuse of existing equipment make this project very cost effective in contrast to lighting separately at a later date. Estimated savings would be $2,908 compared to the cost of this work as a separate project. - Deductive Alternate #3: Eliminate Lighting of T-Ball Fields (Subtract $18,902) - The Richland Youth Association has constructed two (2) new "T-Ball" Fields in Richfield Park over the past two years. These facilities, valued at approximately $60,000, were constructed with materials purchased by the Richland Youth Association and built with volunteer labor. These facilities are not currently lighted but can be illuminated at a significant cost savings if coordinated with the proposed lighting project. The estimated savings by "economy-of-scale" would be $11,098 compared to the cost of this work as a separate project. · ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST LIGHTING LIGHTING FACILITIES AS FACILITIES AS A SEPARATE PROJECT PART OF THIS PROJECT SAVINGS Tennis Courts $ 14,000 $ 5,786* $ 8,214 Basketball Courts $ 7,000 $ 4,092* $ 2,908 "T-Ball" Fields $ 30.000 $ 18.902 $11.098 SUB-TOTAL $ 51,000 $ 28,780 $22,220 Engineering/Design $ 4.000 $ 0 $ 4.000 TOTAL $ 55,000 $ 28,780 $26,220 *Using approved existing poles and fixtures from baseball fields. e - The net savings of approving the base bid which includes these facilities, at this time can be estimated at approximately $26,220. This "economy of scale" results from the reuse of existing equipment, non-duplication of design fees, consolidated transportation cost for poles and fixtures, bid costs, bonding costs, etc.. This represents nearly a 50% savings on the cost of lighting two (2) T-Ball fields, two (2) tennis courts and two (2) basketball courts. Staff recommends including these facilities as part of the park lighting renovation project. staff has researched and evaluated this project diligently in an effort to provide our citizens with the best facility improvement value for the dollar. . p~,.~ !j¡3n ~ I uL ~ :.'l _ - Pou::z; SAT1~~~ \ í1:!tJN\ ~ Z , tcrvf2.,(S · .' o o I~ o o , \P . ¡ ~ 100 0 100 200 300 ~ ~ SCALE.N fEET ...~~" "', ~""'~~þ ~\1~~-.J1 " ~~ ~:~. -:-"_ _ '- ?.f~.J . ' ... . . . ....- ---- : ..,--. , .. . _u_ ::::; :.:~~/:..:". / ____ :':::. .:\ ,. ,1 ____:!...:.:'.. ~.:...... ',1 I ~..:~:. :....: . . ....:.~ /' " _.__ .... .,. :....,f I I . .._ i;:·...:.:::·~:·:~:·.:. · '........ .. ,- fl r MOlnr ~~'.' · · ..'.. . :" ZJ~. ~ :::. r...::..:" :.:.......~~.;-:::... RICI-IFIELD P ARI( I;XISTING CONDITIONS' 01:=TÁIL -=It- i :-,' <;cHE.~"IC. L-À.'(ouT or- F'ÀRK IYATAUGA - SAfITIIF/éLO ROAD . . . .. ---.. - ---------, ~.. ~tÞ--~,,/ r1"1 Þ¡::. , Or ' ~1, / n6) , ~~ /' ;oJ¡ Z I" ' / , / 1';_ -.l I+_ td w I ,00l; ~ I , 1 , , I I , I , , \ \ \ \ \ , \ . " (9 --'-.,.. ~, \ \ t1f gð~ ero µ 0 y \" \ \ o 11:p _ , o (ß -\ · rn" m -Þ ~ -;,.. \ I , ~ -It Y o - r. 8 ,\- ò:)/: 1~- (5t0 C -{ ~cI ,." þ- or ..,r "- 8p zr 6~ zp ~' T+- ~ IZ' " '\ . , , .., M ï ~ - N )\ .., M r ~ ~ ~iD i~ .ÿ1> i~ I~ I t) .. ..t'+_D 1> W J-:õf .. .., c 9 cø ]Þ ï ï ~ ~ T,-$-- F'. I~ ~ If +J> \ \ \ \ \ " .. " " .. .. c;, If ~Oj e;, I ~ ~ J.: n :w-1 w . ..' . ) ~ :n 1\ Ž (â) ~ Do ..., 8 -f ~ ... ï . N -. I J> +' I-:9f " 1- +ep OJ ~ .::-f 62' ~ r --. . · FE wi Ti rotO 01 . I ;f ~ ! - -'1~' to ..--i Þ I o.~ - · ï ï , ,,~ {+ l~- :J ,., ï P W +J> . rJl ~ ;01 a-+ <?J? IJ> ...., . -+- ,~')r~ .+.~ ú'_ . ,.. 1- I g . _1.:+ tJj ~ J-:õf /> (/ , z ;' ~ g~ -: .!1P 0" I;; ..~ ,,01 - c ,+~ g ~ "J'- ø ,,,,:g 5 ~ ;/ ~ø:J ,. ~~: ~ " .,;' ~ '" ~ ~ ~~ a. -; ~,. ,. ~,.6 ã: Q." ~ tà !l'ø ø ...'" a. ~ a. ;: .,. fÕ g ¡ i , ~ .. --!' ..-- .._----~---- ' " ·4 RICHFIELD PARK SPORTS FACILITY LIGHT LEVEL ANALYSIS - SUMMARY -- FACILITY ACTUAL AVERAGE MINIMUM COMMENTS LIGHT LEVEL READINGS STANDARD LEVELS* (FOOTCANDLES) (FOOTCANDLES) Infield Outfield Infield outfield .- Field #1 12 4 30 20 Approximately 70% (Bronco) Below Standard 200' Outfield Field #2 14 5 30 20 Approximately 64% (Pony/Colt) Below Standard 300' outfield Field #3 18 12 30 20 Approximately 40% (Shetland) Below Standard 150' - 185' Outfield ield #4 17 12 30 20 Approximately 42~ ,Mustang) Below Standard 180' Outfield Tennis Courts 4 30 Approximately 87~ Below Standard The average existing lighting at Richfield Park is currently only 60% below thr minimum recommended standard for proposed levels of play. Liqht Level Readings were not available for football fields. T-Ball fields and basketball courts are currently not lighted. *standard levels as recommended by the Illumination Engineering standards Handbook. . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS e Department: Subject: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 7 ¡B191 Public Hearing on Levying a Schedule of Charges for the Drainage Utili ty Syctcm Agenda Number: PW 91-18 Ordinance No. 1741 Legal notice by advertisement in a local paper on May 23rd, May 30th and June 6th has been accomplished in accordance with State law. The charges shown in the three copies of the subject ordinance are based on a $2.00, $2.50, and $3.00 charge per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) respectively. This translates into an R1 zoned platted lot with a home being charged $2.28 per month for a $2.00/ERU, $2.85 per month for a $2.50/ERU, and $3.42 per month for a $3.00/ERU and an R2 zoned platted lot with a home being charged $1.72 per month for a $2.00/ERU, $2.15 per month for a $2.50/ERU, and $2.58 per month for a $3.00/ERU. The remaining schedule of proposed charges are shown on page 2 of the subject ordinances. A summary of the drainage utility fees currently being charged by some local cities is shown below: City Charge Bedford Keller Euless $2.50 per ERU $2.00 per ERU $1.50 per ERU A Public Hearing was opened on June 24th and recessed. The Mayor should reconvene the Public Hearing, receive further input from citizens and then close the Public Hearing. The Council can then consider Ordinance No. 1741 levying drainage utility fees. Recommendation: It is recommended the City Council conduct the Public Hearing and take action on Ordinance No. 1741. Council should designate prior to any vote on this item which rate, $200/ERU, $2.50/ERU, or $3.00/ERU they are considering. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ Othe N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available ~ e~' nt Head Signature I ~,~~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Ftnance Director Page 1 of $2.00/ERU ORDINANCE NO. 1741 _ AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A SCHEDULE OF DRAINAGE CHARGES FOR THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE UTILITY SYSTEM AGAINST ALL REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO SUCH CHARGES UNDER SECTIONS 402.041, ET. SEQ., SUBCHAPTER C OF CHAPTER 402 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas to protect the health and safety from loss of life and property caused by surface water overflows and surface water stagnation, has heretofore, pursuant to legislative authority established a Municipal Drainage Utility System within the municipal boundaries of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and desires, also pursuant to legislative authority, to provide rules for the use and operation of such system and prescribe and establish fees, together with the assessment, levy and collection thereof, to finance and fund such Municipal Drainage Utility System; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas finds that the basis for the drainage charges set forth herein is directly related to drainage; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, finds that the classification of benefitted properties set forth herein is nondiscriminatory, equitable and reasonable; and _ WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, in setting the schedule of charges for drainage services set forth hereinbelow, has based its calculations upon an inventory of the lots and tracts within the municipal boundaries of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; and WHEREAS, in setting such schedule of charges for drainage service, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has considered the uses made of the benefitted properties, using official zoning maps of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for that purpose, and has also considered the size and topography of the parcels of benefitted property in assessing the drainage charges set forth hereinbelow; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, finds that the schedule of charges set forth hereinbelow, and the rates upon which such schedule of charges was calculated, are equitable for similar services in all areas of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; and _ WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has held a public hearing on the charges levied and imposed herein, after publishing notice of such public hearing, all in the manner prescribed by Subchapter C of Chapter 402 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended by Senate Bill No. 1409 during the 72nd Legislative session. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; Ordinance No. 1741 _ Page 2 I . The following schedule of drainage charges is hereby levied against all real property lying within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, subject to drainage charges under Subchapter C of Chapter 402 of the Texas Local Government Code: A. Basic Drainaae Charae. The rates set forth herein are calculated on basis of a drainage charge of $2.00 per ERU (Equivalent Residential Unit) which is equal to $12.84 per impervious acre of land. Runoff coefficients and corresponding rates per acre for various land uses may be modified by the City Council from time to time by a modification of said Basic Drainage Charge. B. Sinale-Familv Residential (R1, R2, R3, R-4-SD, R-5-D, R-6-T L R-8). The City Council finds that the single-family residential lots within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas will be charged at a rate per platted lot based on their zoning when a building exists on the platted lot. The charge per lot is based on the Basic Drainage Charge. _ Zoning Runoff Coefficient Rate per Lot R1 0.51 $2.28 R2 0.54 $1.72 R3 0.55 $1.48 R-4-SD 0.59 $0.76 R-5-D 0.59 $0.76 R-6-T 0.63 $0.64 R-8 0.62 $0.96 C. All unplatted tracts, platted lots with other than residential zoning, or parcels of land which have solely a residential use are to be charged a drainage fee the same as a platted lot zoned R1 with a house on it. The rate per Rl use shall apply for each residential house which exists on the tract or parcel of land. If in the opinion of the City the tract or parcel contains an above average amount of impervious cover, an analysis of the tract can be conducted to determine the accurate runoff coefficient for the property. The rate for each such case will be adjusted in accordance with the analysis. D. All other lots, tracts and parcels of land within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, shall be charged on the basis of the acreage contained in said lot, tract or parcel of land, and the use made of such property, in accordance with the following schedule of drainage charges which are hereby levied against all such remaining lots, tracts and parcels of land within City of North Richland Hills, Texas. _ e Ordinance No. 1741 Page 3 Land Use Runoff Coefficient Rate per Acre School, Church, & Institutional Multifamily Offices Commercial Industrial 0.62 0.66 0.78 0.80 0.81 $ 7.96 $ 8.47 $10.02 $10.27 $10.40 Properties exempted from paying a drainage charge as described in this ordinance are the following. 1. Property with proper construction and maintenance of a wholly sufficient and privately owned drainage system. Property held and maintained in its natural state, until such time that the property is developed and all of the public infrastructure constructed has been accepted by the City. Subdivided lots, until a structure has been built on the lot and a certificate of occupancy has been issued by the City. Property owned by the City of North Richland Hills. 2 . 3 . 4. e II. The City Council of City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may change, adjust, and readjust the rates and charges established herein for drainage services from time to time by ordinance. III. By the passage of Ordinance No. 1727 and the passage of this Ordinance the City makes no representation that all of the City drainage problems will be immediately solved and the City Council is given full discretion in establishing time and quantitative priorities in expending funds as they become available to meet the drainage needs of the City on a reasonable basis. Nor shall the passage of Ordinance No. 1727 and this Ordinance be construed to relieve private land owners, developers and others from providing drainage improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Rules and Regulations of the City as well as any other ordinance of the City and the laws of this State which relate to drainage or drainage improvements. IV. The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may, by subsequent ordinance, adopt rules for the operation and conduct of tþ the North Richland Hills Municipal Drainage Utility System, including exemptions, if any, from the drainage charges levied therein, consistent with its authority and State law. e Ordinance No. 1741 Page 4 v. Severability Clause. That is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage; provided, however, that the Municipal Drainage Utility System charges levied hereby shall take effect on October I, 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1991. APPROVED: e Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for City e $2.50/ERU ORDINANCE NO. 1741 e AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A SCHEDULE OF DRAINAGE CHARGES FOR THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE UTILITY SYSTEM AGAINST ALL REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO SUCH CHARGES UNDER SECTIONS 402.041, ET. SEQ., SUBCHAPTER C OF CHAPTER 402 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas to protect the health and safety from loss of life and property caused by surface water overflows and surface water stagnation, has heretofore, pursuant to legislative authority established a Municipal Drainage Utility System within the municipal boundaries of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and desires, also pursuant to legislative authority, to provide rules for the use and operation of such system and prescribe and establish fees, together with the assessment, levy and collection thereof, to finance and fund such Municipal Drainage Utility System; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas finds that the basis for the drainage charges set forth herein is directly related to drainage; and e WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, finds that the classification of benefitted properties set forth herein is nondiscriminatory, equitable and reasonable; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, in setting the schedule of charges for drainage services set forth hereinbelow, has based its calculations upon an inventory of the lots and tracts within the municipal boundaries of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; and WHEREAS, in setting such schedule of charges for drainage service, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has considered the uses made of the benefitted properties, using official zoning maps of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for that purpose, and has also considered the size and topography of the parcels of benefitted property in assessing the drainage charges set forth hereinbelow; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, finds that the schedule of charges set forth hereinbelow, and the rates upon which such schedule of charges was calculated, are equitable for similar services in all areas of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; and e WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has held a public hearing on the charges levied and imposed herein, after publishing notice of such public hearing, all in the manner prescribed by Subchapter C of Chapter 402 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended by Senate Bill No. 1409 during the 72nd Legislative session. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; e Ordinance No. 1741 Page 2 I . The following schedule of drainage charges is hereby levied against all real property lying within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, subject to drainage charges under Subchapter C of Chapter 402 of the Texas Local Government Code: A. Basic Drainaae Charge. The rates set forth herein are calculated on basis of a drainage charge of $2.50 per ERU (Equivalent Residential Unit) which is equal to $16.05 per impervious acre of land. Runoff coefficients and corresponding rates per acre for various land uses may be modified by the City Council from time to time by a modification of said Basic Drainage Charge. B. Sinale-Familv Residential lR1, R2, R3, R-4-SD, R-5-D, R-6-T & R-8). The City Council finds that the single-family residential lots within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas will be charged at a rate per platted lot based on their zoning when a building exists on the platted lot. The charge per lot is based on the Basic Drainage Charge. e Zoning Runoff Coefficient Rate oer Lot R1 0.51 $2.85 R2 0.54 $2.15 R3 0.55 $1.85 R-4-SD 0.59 $0.95 R-5-D 0.59 $0.95 R-6-T 0.63 $0.80 R-8 0.62 $1.20 C. All unplatted tracts, platted lots with other than residential zoning, or parcels of land which have solely a residential use are to be charged a drainage fee the same as a platted lot zoned Rl with a house on it. The rate per Rl use shall apply for each residential house which exists on the tract or parcel of land. If in the opinion of the City the tract or parcel contains an above average amount of impervious cover, an analysis of the tract can be conducted to determine the accurate runoff coefficient for the property. The rate for each such case will be adjusted in accordance with the analysis. D. All other lots, tracts and parcels of land within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, shall be charged on the basis of the acreage contained in said lot, tract or parcel of land, and the use made of such property, in accordance with the following schedule of drainage charges which are hereby levied against all such remaining lots, tracts and parcels of land within City of North Richland Hills, Texas. e Ordinance No. 1741 e Page 3 Land Use Runoff Coefficient Rate cer Acre School, Church, & Institutional Multifamily Offices Commercial Industrial 0.62 0.66 0.78 0.80 0.81 $ 9.95 $10.59 $12.53 $12.84 $13.00 Properties exempted from paying a drainage charge as described in this ordinance are the following. 1. Property with proper construction and maintenance of a wholly sufficient and privately owned drainage system. Property held and maintained in its natural state, until such time that the property is developed and all of the public infrastructure constructed has been accepted by the City. Subdivided lots, until a structure has been built on the lot and a certificate of occupancy has been issued by the City. Property owned by the City of North Richland Hills. 2. 3 . 4. e II. The City Council of City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may change, adjust, and readjust the rates and charges established herein for drainage services from time to time by ordinance. III. By the passage of Ordinance No. 1727 and the passage of this Ordinance the City makes no representation that all of the City drainage problems will be immediately solved and the City Council is given full discretion in establishing time and quantitative priorities in expending funds as they become available to meet the drainage needs of the City on a reasonable basis. Nor shall the passage of Ordinance No. 1727 and this Ordinance be construed to relieve private land owners, developers and others from providing drainage improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Rules and Regulations of the City as well as any other ordinance of the City and the laws of this State which relate to drainage or drainage improvements. IV. The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may, by subsequent ordinance, adopt rules for the operation and conduct of the North Richland Hills Municipal Drainage Utility System, including tþexemptions, if any, from the drainage charges levied therein, consistent with its authority and State law. e Ordinance No. 1741 Page 4 V. Severability Clause. That is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage; provided, however, that the Municipal Drainage Utility System charges levied hereby shall take effect on October 1, 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1991. APPROVED: e Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for City e e e e $3.00/ERU ORDINANCE NO. 1741 AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A SCHEDULE OF DRAINAGE CHARGES FOR THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE UTILITY SYSTEM AGAINST ALL REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO SUCH CHARGES UNDER SECTIONS 402.041, ET. SEQ., SUBCHAPTER C OF CHAPTER 402 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas to protect the health and safety from loss of life and property caused by surface water overflows and surface water stagnation, has heretofore, pursuant to legislative authority established a Municipal Drainage Utility System within the municipal boundaries of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and desires, also pursuant to legislative authority, to provide rules for the use and operation of such system and prescribe and establish fees, together with the assessment, levy and collection thereof, to finance and fund such Municipal Drainage Utility System; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas finds that the basis for the drainage charges set forth herein is directly related to drainage; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, finds that the classification of benefitted properties set forth herein is nondiscriminatory, equitable and reasonable; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, in setting the schedule of charges for drainage services set forth hereinbelow, has based its calculations upon an inventory of the lots and tracts within the municipal boundaries of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; and WHEREAS, in setting such schedule of charges for drainage service, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has considered the uses made of the benefitted properties, using official zoning maps of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for that purpose, and has also considered the size and topography of the parcels of benefitted property in assessing the drainage charges set forth hereinbelow; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, finds that the schedule of charges set forth hereinbelow, and the rates upon which such schedule of charges was calculated, are equitable for similar services in all areas of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has held a public hearing on the charges levied and imposed herein, after publishing notice of such public hearing, all in the manner prescribed by Subchapter C of Chapter 402 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended by Senate Bill No. 1409 during the 72nd Legislative session. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; e Ordinance No. 1741 Page 2 I . The following schedule of drainage charges is hereby levied against all real property lying within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, subject to drainage charges under Subchapter C of Chapter 402 of the Texas Local Government Code: A. Basic Drainaae Charge. The rates set forth herein are calculated on basis of a drainage charge of $3.00 per ERU (Equivalent Residential Unit) which is equal to $19.26 per impervious acre of land. Runoff coefficients and corresponding rates per acre for various land uses may be modified by the City Council from time to time by a modification of said Basic Drainage Charge. B. Sinale-Familv Residential (R1, R2, R3, R-4-SD, R-5-D, R-6-T .L R-8). The City Council finds that the single-family residential lots within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas will be charged at a rate per platted lot based on their zoning when a building exists on the platted lot. The charge per lot is based on the Basic Drainage Charge. e Zoning Runoff Coefficient Rate oer Lot R1 0.51 $3.42 R2 0.54 $2.58 R3 0.55 $2.22 R-4-SD 0.59 $1.14 R-5-D 0.59 $1.14 R-6-T 0.63 $0.96 R-8 0.62 $1.44 C. All unplatted tracts, platted lots with other than residential zoning, or parcels of land which have solely a residential use are to be charged a drainage fee the same as a platted lot zoned R1 with a house on it. The rate per R1 use shall apply for each residential house which exists on the tract or parcel of land. If in the opinion of the City the tract or parcel contains an above average amount of impervious cover, an analysis of the tract can be conducted to determine the accurate runoff coefficient for the property. The rate for each such case will be adjusted in accordance with the analysis. D. All other lots, tracts and parcels of land within the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, shall be charged on the basis of the acreage contained in said lot, tract or parcel of land, and the use made of such property, in accordance with the following schedule of drainage charges which are hereby levied against all such remaining lots, tracts and parcels of land within City of North Richland Hills, Texas. e e Ordinance No. 1741 Page 3 Land Use Runoff Coefficient Rate Der Acre School, Church, & Institutional Multifamily Offices Commercial Industrial 0.62 0.66 0.78 0.80 0.81 $11.94 $12.71 $15.03 $15.41 $15.60 Properties exempted from paying a drainage charge as described in this ordinance are the following. 1. Property with proper construction and maintenance of a wholly sufficient and privately owned drainage system. Property held and maintained in its natural state, until such time that the property is developed and all of the public infrastructure constructed has been accepted by the City. Subdivided lots, until a structure has been built on the lot and a certificate of occupancy has been issued by the City. Property owned by the City of North Richland Hills. 2 . 3. 4. e II. The City Council of City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may change, adjust, and readjust the rates and charges established herein for drainage services from time to time by ordinance. III. By the passage of Ordinance No. 1727 and the passage of this Ordinance the City makes no representation that all of the City drainage problems will be immediately solved and the City Council is given full discretion in establishing time and quantitative priorities in expending funds as they become available to meet the drainage needs of the City on a reasonable basis. Nor shall the passage of Ordinance No. 1727 and this Ordinance be construed to relieve private land owners, developers and others from providing drainage improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Rules and Regulations of the City as well as any other ordinance of the City and the laws of this State which relate to drainage or drainage improvements. IV. e The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may, by subsequent ordinance, adopt rules for the operation and conduct of the North Richland Hills Municipal Drainage Utility System, including exemptions, if any, from the drainage charges levied therein, consistent with its authority and State law. e e e Ordinance No. 1741 Page 4 V. Severability Clause. That is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage; provided, however, that the Municipal Drainage Utility System charges levied hereby shall take effect on October 1, 1991. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1991. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for City ~ . e P RoP05£&:' C.e. 'JT~UNe. w ~o~ L..., "4~ ALL 0 f t hat c e, t ¡; 1 f1 h- ,,': t ,y pcH' 0: ~ I :.. f 1 \n<1 '-; d- '.'3 t ed If' i; he JOHN ':ONDR/\ SURVEY, Absty¿\<:t N.). '1(' 1;, T:J.yy."ni; '.o·..1ntv. Te:>:ðc. and t'€·\fll] ;'1 pOyt10n of th@ tract des..:rlbed 1n tt"\P d....ed .~0 Re.ber''',; L. He'3ch @tux l~ltJr'ê\ rœcordsd 1n Vol ume 4795, P.~ae 61 '] Q t t. t".e úef..~d ~~'fJC 0(' de:,. T ~Y"" ~n t ('('lInt .¥', rex as and moye P . y tic u 1 a r 1 y d as c,. 1 bed b Y I;' e t ~ ~ ..~ r' d b 01 \I'" r1 ~ .-'\ <;:; t ..~. 1 1 ':J"-' S : 'J ~b II... ~~ ~ ~ . ~N 5~ "2~ "2Q.. 1i- ~~ 8~ ûi:> ~ õ Ò o 2 Õ' TEMPO~ÞRY ESMT. A -:.oo·Zg'o" r?-= I \ Î 8. ï l L- ~ 9 . ~8 Begtnninq at ~. 1/2" ,:apped steel rod ~I; ~mped ( T\o...k sur v. 1r.,=.' 1n the W@st boundar y 11 ne (') f sa id HF}sC h t,.. ac t f y .:>m -..h 1 C h t; he Nor t hwe!'>t ': c·y ner () t sa 1 d tYð.:t bears North 00 degy&t.::::: 01 OtlnLtte5 33 C;~QrHj5 Ec-\st ~:(). 45 feet: ~o S~ RT' L... HESCH Ej'\J')C GL..oftlA VOL- . q.'9'!Þ, p(7. <.øl3. p2"T~\ E:x I ì/~ JOHN CONDRA SURV~Y, A-3\O PAPCEl ~ ~ ~ t:-: SC ¡:;. ! ¡'-' f ~ ~N Thence 1n an Easteyly dire,~t ":.·n with tn~~ '"-:"....l~l 'no of Bursey Poad fa vaY'lable width '( lqht of WdX·' thp ':Attt. : :¡ht- .~. \.,.I,-··,v f -:' l 1,:.'; 1 n (~ ," ~ 1 1 '~ : 1 t pp e South steel S':Ju t h steel ~3·..Ju t h st ,,~el Selu t: h sta-o?l Hese:t't 88 deClreecs rod stamped 81 degr '::f'?S rod ,;tamped 7'3 r1eQ1'" ~es J" ,")d stamp €?d b3 deÇJr~e4E. t" ~,d ~ t L~ fiiP ~d t(::1ct: 02 mlnut.~=,,~ c Inr.:I¿t~: ~ u t' ..' . 1(, "'llìutes ( mc. a t< C;Lt r '../ · 1 5 mi nu'. e:3 c.. moa.~ c.::UY v · --:5 mlnut~C::i 1m.:) a k :-: u r '.. . t 5 $f?C on d ~ E a ~ t t -1 . ;. G , ee r t ,'. inc. ); 04 sec('.nr1~1 E.a$t .~':~. I"j fE-at · '-, i "'t: . \ ; 4(t 5~C onds E ,.lS t ~ 3. ~'. J f .~fl· ln~. .; 56 seconds Eclst ~:..).6-1. t~et trl 1 n.-:: .) \ n t h& E~~t tJI .'-,.....d~... '. I. ~ n~ ,~ t,' II ¡~Jpp~d ð 1,.. _." ~uped 1 ... .- ·.~po~~ .. 1 I ~ I' .: r\ppec1 '-:If ~all_1 Th ..?n.: I ~ ~~ '.='u t. , . -.\ I rj eçH" p~r:-. pA ITIl nu t es () 4 -= f?r~ ,-)n.1 ~~ I" I(~,,=, + ".- : .. h P S':-i 1 :::~ é:.' :. t bÜU¡ì("~,:\.- / ; .,-,(;' i'3..-::0 rt::,~t ....-. -. It r:, p r ,;a~'1 - ·t· -. '. I ~",,,, r 1. Q h t: Ü f " J ,.. Y ~! P e '::-. f In,· . ~ iP ',,~ìe l.,r '''p..:,~::n(J ~out"leY 1 y e:urVf? ~- the l~ft: ~r,cp.j (f'P"-'é'~' · ~ (r' ,..- e v r.- ':' :\ d . t y ',.' , .4' ',0 " Thence with ~dlrt pr't.."po4J1ed yo loht ,:Jf '''''e-,y 1 in@ anr.t t:HYVe tl:-"~ the left ....,t)'/lng a radiu~ .-:.f 1 ~ 78. 71 f~et, a .-:pnt.roal '''I,~lQ t:,tf I) d@'Jr"ee£ ':9 tnlr\Utp«! 07 . eaf':·')f'"td5. an .~r r ~! l-:.,t ,-,n~ e .",. ,,~. ";lC t' ~~t ,..,H1d 1 CtnQ < rl)Y' f1 ,', f ~~.-,( '.' h ""J deqt- PÇH'; .j'~ mlnutes ~t?,,:,.>nd~ ~o est ,",'0"' ,:,:\ l/~:" :-_~ppr~<1 ·,~t~~.~i ('-.'(1 .1.\mpe(J 'ff'('~~" :='V.f"V. i n I: . ~ : Thence ì',¡c,,..trl 74 dagyees l";~ "'lnut~s 58 second';; ~'~st (·':'r.t lr.Ulnq Wi th ~~ld p'" op.:¡sed r 1 gh1" '-' f way I i np- 58. 78 f £?E!t t C' '" \.':'" ': "DPF" I. +: PO'> 1 ~ r,d ., t ,,<n·per! (m.~~¥ surv. tnf.:.) ~t th~ b.-'_"-:11nnlnq of .~ curvp to tne ~f~ft ~ Thent:e cent lnL\lna with ';ald pyoposed Y lqht of I.,<I¿\V 11n~"' ;~nd ~UYV~ t·_, tr.e left having 3 ,..adIUs. of 740.00 teet, a cent,...,1 angle c·f 7 dtt9YP.t~5 21 minutes 58 ~econd$, an ~rc dlst.nce of 95.14 feet and a long chord of North 77 degree5 54 A'I1nutp!> '=ï1 seconds We"St 95.07 feet to a \ /2" '~õlpp@d ste....1 yod st',~mped ''nodk ~t..tYV. inc. ,t In tt,C' WH~~ houndar'v llne .:-1 ~.;\d He~,:h tr ~.c::t: ThencE.' t'!(".Y'+;~ dO ,1en~e~~ 1 ~ n ~ .~ () . ':'; ~:; f ~~e t t..J t t-. fi \ 3nlj . m.)Y (;' or J e~s. 01 m 1 nutec; 31 ~ C?.-: ond~ £c3 5t wit h ~:·d i d wøçt t~·)und ;:n- v p 1 dC e ú f beg 1 nn 1 nq '::;.f)(j '. c·n t ë\ 1 rl1 nr;¡ <'. IJ ¡8'1 '-"'t:.., ,~s :) f e \ ~ ;-"(" .. ~' -L~ . \ Y-,_--.;,q '--- G DAVID C. MOAK SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURV EYOR PO. BOX 1034 268- 2211 HUR S T t TEXAS DATE - zz. - ~ \ NO'B~_ ~~- 1\ TYPE 3