HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1981-07-08 Agendas
CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 8, 1991 - 6:30 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820.
! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
1. IR 91-81 Richland Youth Association Proposal Regarding
Concession Stand (5 Minutes)
2. IR 91-77 Fire Inspection Program (5 Minutes)
3. PU 91-22 Park Lighting Project (Agenda Item No. 19)
(10 Minutes)
4. GN 91-96 Dan Echols Senior Adult Center (Agenda Item
No. 16) (5 Minutes)
5. IR 91-76 Re-engagement of KPMG Peat Marwick for Fiscal
Year 1990/91 Audit (5 Minutes)
6. PW 91-18 Public Hearing on Levying a Schedule of Charges
for the Drainage Utility System - Ordinance No.
1741 (Agenda Item No. 20) (5 Minutes)
7. IR 91-78 Parks and Recreation Brochure - Recognition
and
IR 91-79 Texas Forest Service - Certificate of Merit
(5 Minutes)
8. Other Items
e
e
e
1
ORDINANCE NO.
1748
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING
ORDINANCE 1080 , THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO
ESTABLISH REGULATIONS REGARDING CARNIVALS AND SPECIAL
EVENTS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAs, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Ci ty of North
Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for
amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,
by changing the said ordinance as set forth herein.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, Section 24.4 TEMPORARY USES AND BUILDINGS be hereby amended to
insert the following paragraph:
(b) Carnivals, circuses and special fund raising events sponsored by
a public entity, civic or non-profit organization located within
the City may be held for a period not exceeding seven days on an
open si te containing at least six acres in any non-residential
zoning district, provided that adequate parking and sanitary
facilities are made available to the satisfaction of the Building
Official. There shall be at least 180 days between subsequent
events at the same location and/or by the same sponsor. No
reduction in any minimum zoning requirement shall be affected by
such activity. To protect nearby residents, the Building
Official shall establish the terms and conditions for the
temporary use at the time of approval.
2.
S~ILITY CLAUSE. That, it is hereby declared to be the intention
of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses
and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be
declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid jUdgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconsti tutionali ty shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since
the same would have been enacted by the Ci ty Council wi thout the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
-
-
e
e
e
2
3.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That, Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the
City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full
force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance.
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. That, this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and PUblication as provided by the
North Richland Hills Charter and the laws of the state of Texas.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13tIDAY OF Jm:lE
1991.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS
1991
DAY OF
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY
-
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
June 13,1991
e
There being no one, the Chairman
called for those wishing to
opposition to this amen
come forward.
There bei 0 one wishing to speak,
Chai Brock closed the Public
ing.
Mr. Bowen said he felt this was
something they had just overlooked and
think it is a good thing to correct
it.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PZ 91-15. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Miller and the motion carried 5-0.
4.
PZ 91-09
Public Hearing to consider an
amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080
regarding Carnivals and other special
events.
e
e
Chairman Brock said the Commission has
taken a long hard look at this, Mr.
LeBaron has checked with several other
cities to see how they handle
carnivals and special events, and now
has prepared an ordinance which reads
as follows: "Carnivals, circuses and
special fund raising events sponsored
by a public entity, civic or
non-profit organization located within
the City may be held for a period not
exceeding seven days on an open site
containing at least six acres in any
non-residential zoning district,
provided that adequate parking and
sanitary facilities are made available
to the satisfaction of the Building
Official. There shall be at least 180
days between subsequent events at the
same location and/or by the same
sponsor. No reduction in any minimum
zoning requirement shall be affected
by such activity. To protect nearby
residents, the Building Official shall
establish the terms and conditions for
the temporary use at the time of
approval."
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
June 13, 1991
e
PZ 91-09
APPROVED
5.
PS 91-10
e
e
-........
Chairman Brock opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this amendment to
please come forward.
There being no one, the Chairman
called for those wishing to speak in
opposition to this amendment to please
come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
Chairman Brock closed the Public
Hearing.
Ms. Marin made the motion to approve
PZ 91-09. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Collins and the motion carried
5-0.
Request of Arthur E. Gordon for
Preliminary Plat of Lot 2, Block 1,
Green Valley Addition (previously
submitted as Lot 1, Block 2). is
property is located on the th side
of Green Valley Drive be en
Smithfield Road and Da s Boulevard.
Mark
came
L and Associates
represent Mr. Gordon.
said there are two issues,
7 foot easement requirement along
east side and the 15 foot building
ne requirement, but they understand
there is an existing building there.
Mr. Long stated the building is
already there.
Chairman Brock stated that last Monday
night, the City Council considered the
school's plat to the west of this
property and they required an addition
5 feet dedication for road widening
for Green Valley Drive. Chairman
Brock asked if Mr. Gordon would be
willing to dedicate an additional 5
feet also.
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
April 25, 1991
e
for compact cars. He said
that is in the curr
Ordinance is Ie; he not
know it carne from.
PZ 91-08
APPROVED
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PZ 91-08 with the addition of the
table for compact cars. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the
motion carried 7-0.
3.
PZ 91-09
Public Hearing for consideration of an
amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080
regarding carnivals and other special
events.
e
Chairman Wood stated he would open the
Public Hearing for anyone to speak,
but would request this be tabled
pending additional information from
other cities to see how they handle
these events. He stated that the
current ordinance does not allow
carnivals and other such events.
PZ 91-09
TABLED
Mr. Barfield made the motion to table
PZ 91-09. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 7-0.
4.
PZ 91-13
Discussion of an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding
political signs.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Wood said case was for
discussion only a e Commission has
elected to ce discussion until a
later date
e meeting adjourned at 7:50 P.M.
e
Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission
Planning & Zoning Commission
~
Page 9
P & Z Minutes
April 11, 1991
e
6.
PZ 91-09
e
7.
PZ 91-10
e
They als the requirement
mpact car parking and handicap
parking. They asked Mr. LeBaron to do
more study on this and bring back at
the next meeting.
.
Discussion of proposed regulations
regarding carnivals and other special
events.
Chairman Wood stated that the way the
Zoning Ordinance is written, it does
not allow carnivals.
It was discussed that they should be
allowed in some zoning district and
give latitude to the staff to enforce
the requirements, but not to give the
responsibility to the City Council.
It was also discussed that they could
be in City parks and this could be
coordinated with the recreation
department.
Discussion regarding the rezoning of
an area in the Diamond Loch
Subdivision from Duplex to a Sin
Family Zoning District.
Chairman Wood stated a portion of
Diamond Loch Addit zoned for
duplexes, R-5-D ut only one duplex
was built, others were built as
single ly R-l like the rest of
Dia Loch. He asked if P & Z would
t to initiate a zoning change to
R-1 and contact all property owners
within 200 feet of this property.
Mr. LeBaron said the Zoning Ordinance
says that the City Council, Planning
and Zoning Commission, or an owner of
property or agent of the owner of
property may initiate a zoning change.
He said this zoning classification was
done many years ago and the purpose of
requesting a zone change would be to
clean up the map.
--
~epartment:
.., Public Hearing for Request of Bank of North Texas
SUbject:
for an Appeal Hearing to Rezone Tract 7, John's
Addition, From its Present Classification of C-2
Commercial to 1-2 Industrial. This Property is
Located on the East Side of Davis Boulevard,
South of the Railroad
Community Development
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
7/8/91
Council Meeting Date:
PZ 91-11
Agenda Number:
Ordinance 111747
The Bank of North Texas submitted a request for a zoning district change on a 3 acre
tract located on the east side of Davis Boulevard approximately 400 feet south of the
Cotton Belt Railroad. The property contains a large building which has been used as a
cabinet shop for a number of years. However, the property is currently zoned C-2 and a
cabinet shop is not a permitted use in the C-2 zoning district. The Bank of North Texas
requested a change to the 1-2 Industrial Zone to satisfy current zoning requirements.
At the May 9th meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the request was denied by
a 4-3 vote. At the June 10th City Council meeting, the Council set July 8th as the date
to consider the request.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider
the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
, Finance Director
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) - Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget ,
Other ß" - ~Â
~~ 'J) KC4 ,~-v-~ ~ ~
Deðartment Head Signature ' , ty Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Pa e 1 of
AG
~
JtR-I
Page 9
p & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
e
Mr.
Bowen seconded the motion and the
vote was 4-3 with Marin, Lueck, and
Brock voting against. The motion
carried.
4.
PZ 91-11
Public Hearing for request of the Bank
of North Texas to rezone Tract 7,
John's Addition, from its present
classification of C-2 Commercial to
1-2 Industrial. This property is
located on the east side of Davis
Boulevard and south of the railroad.
e
Mr. LeBaron stated this tract of land
at one time had a cabinet shop in it,
but a cabinet shop is not an allowed
use in C-2 zoning and the building
does not conform to the masonry
requirement for C-2 zoning. He said
the structure is currently vacant and
before it can be used again, it either
needs to be rezoned to 1-2 or the
building be brought up to code and be
used for something other than a
cabinet shop.
Chairman Brock opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman called for those wishing
to speak in opposition to this request
to please come forward.
e
Councilman Scoma came forward. He
stated that he was speaking on behalf
of several neighbors who has property
adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
property being requested for rezoning.
He said he understands the bank needs
to utilize this facility for revenue
purposes and not just let it set
there. Councilman Scoma said he
understands it is non-conforming. He
said they are totally in agreement in
making it where a cabinet shop can be
Page 10
p & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
e
in that facility. He said they don't
object to the cabinet shop as they
have lived with it for years.
e
Councilman Scoma said one of the major
concerns is that this Planning and
Zoning Commission and the Council has
done a lot of work looking at the
zoning map of the city and
establishing some areas where
industrial would work. He said they
have at the present time, no
industrial property on the east side
of Davis Boulevard, south of the rail
road tracks except for a piece in
front of the new post office that is
zoned industrial. He said it ties
into the old airport property that is
zoned industrial. Councilman Scoma
said that was intended to be opened up
as a road into some large tracts that
would encourage manufacturing
companies to move here.
e
Councilman Scoma said one objection
that they have is not only does this
represent industrial zoning, it is
considered to be a commercial area
according to our master plan, but it
is also a small tract of land that
limits the use of this property to
such things as machine shops, plumbing
shops, sheet metal shops, welding
shops that have outdoor storage. He
said this is not compatible with the
residential area; it is not compatible
with what the residents were told when
they bought their property. He said
there is a piece of agricultural
property behind the houses in
Sunnybrook and their concern is if we
approve the industrial zoning carte
blanche that there will be an attempt
in the future to make it industrial
also. Councilman Scoma said he
encourages P & Z tonight as a
homeowner in the area to restrict the
industrial use to only a cabinet shop
or to reject the request for general
industrial use.
Page 11
p & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
e
B. J. Wilkinson, 6433 Westgate, came
forward. He said Westgate backs up to
this area. He said these houses were
built within this last year and there
are about 30 houses there. He said
all the homeowners were told this
would remain as it is and we are
concerned.
Robert Hightower, 6437 Westgate Drive,
came forward. He said he is close
enough to the cabinet shop to hit it
with a rock. He said he has two small
children. He said when he moved in he
specifically asked what it was zoned
and was told it was commercial. Mr.
Hightower said he didn't have a
problem with that and he would like it
to remain that way.
e
Keith Smith, 6441 Westgate Drive, came
forward. He said they were told it
was currently commercial and would
probably stay that way. He asked Mr.
LeBaron about what he said about the
bank having a proposed use for the
property.
Mr. LeBaron said their application
said the sale was contingent on getting
the zoning change.
Mr. Smith asked about the same usage.
Mr. Bowen stated that the cabinet shop
was a non-conforming use, it was
already there. He said there is some
question as to where it has been
vacant for 6 months or not.
Mr. LeBaron read what was written on
the application: "Previous use was
inconsistent with zoning. Similar use
will be established if zoning change
can be obtained."
e
Mr. Lueck asked if a cabinet shop
could go in if the building was
brought up to code.
Page 12
p & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
e
Mr. LeBaron stated it could not.
Mr. Smith said he has a problem with
changing the zoning to industrial, but
has no objection to the cabinet shop.
He said it opens the gate to allow
businesses that are not favorable and
it will lower the property value of
these houses.
Mr. Barfield asked if he was aware of
the outdoor storage allowed in C-2
zoning. He said you can have 20% of
the lot for outdoor storage in C-2
without changing the zoning. Mr.
Barfield said the cabinet shop would
have to be in Industrial zoning and he
is not sure we, as a Board, are at
liberty to pick and choose in the
Industrial zoning.
e
Ron Wright came forward. He said his
family has property at 8217 and 8221
Cardinal Lane. He said he feels that
a zoning change would hurt the use of
the property. Mr. Wright said his
family has owned the property for 50
years and do not look forward to it
being used as industrial. He asked
what percent outdoor storage is
allowed in industrial zoning.
Mr. Pence said there is no outdoor
storage in Industrial zoning.
Mr. Wright said he is still opposed to
the industrial zoning.
Jack King, 8301 Cardinal, came
forward. He said he was against this
for all the same reasons. He said he
and his wife took a survey of the
residential area and they were 100% in
opposition to this request and said
they would sign a petition.
e
Page 13
p & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
e
e
Councilman Scoma came forward again.
He said he would like to address Mr.
Barfield's comment in regard to the
restriction of not being allowed to
pick and choose. Councilman Scoma
stated that the staff attorney has
told us that we can, the P & Z can, or
the council can restrict the use of
that property to a cabinet shop, if
that is what we want to do under 1-2.
He said he and the neighbors are not
opposed to the cabinet shop; it was
already there when they moved into the
area. Councilman Scoma said they
would understand if it had to be
rezoned to accommodate that. He said
the concern is now you are opening up,
if you should resolve and the council
approve the 1-2 zoning, you then would
have contiguous property adjacent to
that and it would be inclined to be
zoned industrial and then the whole
area would be industrial and would
allow types of businesses we do not
want, so you can restrict that too
based on Rex McEntire's comments the
other day.
Jeff Walter, 6425 Westgate, came
forward. He thanked Councilman Scoma
for his leadership tonight. Mr.
Walter said he echoes the feelings of
his neighbors tonight, he said he and
his wife are against this rezoning for
the same reasons.
Captain Michael Plan, U.S.A.F.,
address 6409 Amundson, came forward.
He stated he has plans to sell his
home within the next year and if you
open this up to industrial, it would
definitely affect the resale of his
property. He said he has no problem
with what is already there.
e
Chairman Brock asked for a show of
hands of the ones present who are in
opposition to the rezoning.
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
9.
Work Session (5 Minutes)
10.
*Executive Session (5 Minutes)
a. Personnel
b. Briefing on Pending Litigation
c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition
114.
1 Adjournment - 7:20 p.m.
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
,
CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CI1Y COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 8, 1991
For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion
and/or action.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting June 24,
1991
5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions
None
6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by
Asterisk (14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19)
8. PZ 91-09 Public Hearing for Consideration of an
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No.
1080 Regarding Carnivals and Other
Special Events - Ordinance No. 1748
Page 2
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN !
9. PZ 91-11 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of Bank of North
Texas for an Appeal Hearing to Rezone
Tract 7, John's Addition, from C-2
Commercial to 1-2 Industrial (Located on
the east side of Davis Boulevard south of
the railroad)
I 10. I Ordinance No. 1747 I !
11. PZ 91-15 Public Hearing for Consideration of an
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No.
1080 Regarding Day Care/Kindergartens
in U-Institutional Zone - Ordinance No.
1749
12. GN 91-90 Appointments to the Charter Revision
Commission (1991) - Resolution
No. 91-23 (Tabled at the June 14, 1991
Meeting)
13. GN 91-92 Basketball Goals and Other Obstructions
or Hazards in the Street Right-of-Way -
Ordinance No. 1743
* 14. GN 91-93 Appointments to Board of Appeals
*15. GN91-95 Appointments to Park and Recreation
Board
*16. GN 91-96 Dan Echols Senior Adult Center
*17. PU 91-20 Approve Purchase of Right-af-Way from
Robert and Gloria Hesch for the
Proposed Construction of Bursey Road
(Parcel # 11 )
II>
Page 3
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
*18. PU 91-21 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way from
Eddie and Doris Warren for the
Proposed Construction of Bursey Road
(Parcel #12)
I *19. PU 91-22 I Park Lighting Project I I
20. PW 91-18 Public Hearing on Levying a Schedule of
Charges for the Drainage Utility System -
Ordinance No. 1741
21. Citizens Presentation
Mr. Fritz Radmacher
9124 Nob Hill Drive
Re: Request for Appeal Hearing -
Woodland Oaks Zoning Case
Denial
I 22. I Adjournment I I
PfJSTED
~ - 3 -4 /
Date
---- ¿¡:C¿o 12.m
''firne
City Secretary
B~r::!?~~
-"'-<....--..........-- ~. .~..............
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AN D CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 91-81
e
Date:
July 8, 1991
Subject:
Richland Youth Association Proposal Regarding Concession
Stand
Richland Youth Association officers have made informal inqu1r1es
recently about City participation in expanding the concession stand at
Richfield Park. The present concession stand/storage building is
seriously inadequate and overcrowded.
RYA officers have developed a plan whereby the existing building could
be expanded, utilizing free labor provided by RYA members, with the
City purchasing the materials. The estimated cost of the materials is
$15,000.
Mayor Brown has requested that this item be discussed by the City
Council, and referred to the Parks and Recreation Board for
consideration and recommendation if the Council wishes to pursue this
project.
Respectfull
¡efl
ubmitted,
e
Rodger N. Line
City Manager
RNL/gp
e
ISSUED BY TH E CITY MANAG ER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
e
e
e
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 91-77
^
~~
-c::::::.:::: .. ::::::=-
~~
V
Date:
July 8, 1991
Subject:
Fire Inspection Program
At the budget study session last year, the City Council directed that
consideration be given to reestablishing the annual Fire Safety
Inspection Program which was previously performed in North Richland
Hills. The possibility of establishing fees to partially offset its
cost was also proposed.
The Fire Chief and his staff have thoroughly studied this proposal and
have submitted the attached information. It appears that most Tarrant
County Fire Departments conduct annual inspection programs, but only
Fort Worth and Bedford charge a fee therefor.
The anticipated gröss revenue from establishing fees as listed in the
attached draft ordinance totals approximately $20,000 per year
exclusive of billing and collection costs.
As pointed out by Chief Gertz, there is a strong possibility that the
collection difficulties and negative reaction from our business
community migh~ offset this relatively minor revenue gain.
Chief Gertz and his staff fully support the proposal to reestablish the
annual inspection program. We request the City Council's guidance
regarding establishing a fee for this service.
Respectfully submitted,
/(1l/~
Rodger N. Line
City Manager
RNL/gp
_ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NOATH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
_ ~J\1_
~\F"
e
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
(\~
~/
SUBJECT:
STAN GERTZ, FIRE CHIEF ~
DANNY TAYLOR, DIVISION CHIEF M/;E:
FIRE INSPECTION PROGRAM
91-145
TO
FROM
06/05/91
As requested I have gathered all information concerning on going
fire inspections for fee programs currently operated in this area.
Fort Worth and Bedford are the only cities that have an active
program at this time. Shown below are the ways that their systems
work.
Fort Worth
Engine companies due in-service inspecti.ons of all businesses.
After the inspection is complete a three piece form is filled out.
One copy is given to the business owner, one copy is kept by
the Engine company and the third is sent to Fire Prevention to be
entered in the computer. The computer develops a bill from the
information on the form. The amount of the bill 1S determined by
square footage of the building or space occupied.
e
The bill is mailed to the business with 30 days to pay. If not
paid a reminder is sent with 14 days to pay. If it is still not
paid another 14 day notice is sent. If at the end of 58 days and
three notices the bill has still not been paid, citations may be
issued.
Bedford
Bedford operates completely different. They require an annual
Fire Marshal's permit. The permit 1S issued to the building owner
rather than individual tenants. The annual bill is sent out in
November of each year and is due by January 1. They, like Fort
Worth send a total of three notices. Two after January 1 if not
paid on time. After the three notices have been sent and no fee
has been received, citations may be issued.
When their Engine companies due in-service inspections they ask to
see their permits. If they do not have a current permit they are
asked to go to the Fire Prevention office and get a permit. Their
information is also sent to the Fire Prevention Division for
follow up.
e
This system works much like our environmental department permits.
Ron Hawthorne said their program has been going for four years and
they received around a 97% collection rate. He also said the
first year was tough and the people were not happy campers.
_~/~--
e~\f
TO
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
RODGER LINE, CITY MANAG~~ REF:
STAN GERTZ, FIRE CHIEF ~ DATE:
FIRE INSPECTION PROGRAM WITH FEE
91-133
FROM
MAY 28, 1991
The above program was suggested by members of the city council
while attending the budget workshop in Waco in July, 1990.
This program would require the fire department truck companies to
make annual fire inspections of all businesses, retail stores,
schools (private and public), and churches. At the conclusion of
each inspection, the place of business will be presented with a
fire inspection invoice. The amount of the fee is based on the
attached memo under purposed ordinance #1692.
Meetings with Finance Director, Lee Maness and the City Attorney
indicate there are no legal methods in collecting these fees from
businesses who fail to make payment within the allotted time
period.
e
without a procedure to collect overdue fire inspection fees, this
program has the ear marks of a failure, while creating a poor city
image to our business people. Especially when one business owner
learns he has paid his inspection fee and his neighbors business
did not, and no action will be taken to collect on the overdue
account.
Please schedule this item on a pre-council agenda at your
convenience.
SRG:cs
e
e
e
e
ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS, in order to protect the health and safety of the public, the health
and safety of employees in places of business, the health and safety of business invitees and
the health and safety of firefighters it is necessary to require that each place of business
within the City undergo an annual fire safety inspection by the office of the Fire Marshall;
IT IS THEREFORE ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
The Office of the Fire Marshall of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas
shall conduct an annual fire-safety inspection upon each business or commercial premise
within the City. The purpose of the inspection shall be to ascertain that the premises
inspected are in compliance with the Fire Code of the City.
2.
In the event that the annual inspection reveals that the premises are in
violation of the Fire Code, the Fire Marshall will point out to the person or firm occupying
the premises, in writing, the nature of the violation and will order, in writing, that such
violation be corrected and abated within a reasonable time. The period of time shall not
be less than ten days. Upon being satisfied that the premises meet the Fire Code the Fire
Marshall shall issue a satisfactory fire inspection certificate. It shall be unlawful to operate
any type of business or commercial operation within the City without a current fire safety
inspection certificate attached.
3.
The occupant shall pay an annual fire safety inspection fee based upon the size
of the premises inspected, as follows:
Less than 5, 000 Sq. Ft. $ 15
5,001 to 10,000 Sq. Ft. $ 25
10,001 to 25,000 Sq. Ft. $ 30
25,001 to 50,000 Sq. Ft. $ 40
50,001 to 75,000 Sq. Ft. $ 60
75,001 to 100,000 Sq. Ft. $ 75
100,001 to 200,000 Sq. Ft. $100
200,001 Sq. Ft. or more $200
e
e
e
Ordinance No.
Page 2
Such inspection fee shall be paid to the Finance Office of the City within 30 days of the
inspection. When such inspection fee is not paid within said 30 days period, the occupant
shall be deemed in violation of this ordinance.
4.
Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any portion of this
ordinance shall be deemed to be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not in excess of $200.
Each day of violation shall be a separate offence.
5.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of
passage and publication as required by law.
1991.
PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of
APPROVED:
ATIEST:
Tommy Brown - Mayor
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire - Attorney for the City
City of JXòrth Richland Hills
e
e
e
January 31, 1991
TO: Stan Gertz
FROM: Camelia Fisher
SUBJECT: Fire Inspection Accounts Receivable
I just wanted to briefly follow-up on our conversation of several
weeks ago.
We are available at your convenience to get started on the
accounts receivable for fire inspections. The only suggestions
we had were the ones covered in the meeting in Lee Maness's
office which dealt with the modification of the forms and the
inclusion of a late payment penalty of $10.00 in the Fire
Inspection Ordinance.
The addition of the $10 late payment penalty will assist us in
the event the account has to be turned over to a collection
agency.
The form modification should include the following additional
information:
Billing Name and Address
Tax ID #
Ticket #
Please give me a call when you are ready to get started so
someone can be available to process your documents.
/J / ~~_,
L¿2 ~u::¿(e'~ ,,_~ -;:þ;Í¿/f--
Camelia Fisher
(817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180
e
e
e
RODGER LINE, CITY t-1ANAGER
90-041
FEBRUARY 12, 199~
STAN GERTZ, FIRE CHIEF
AREA FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTION FEES
The followjng fire departments surveyed in thjs area currently
charge a fee as indjcated or have no fee as the jnspection may
not be performed by the local department.
Annual Inspection Fee
Fort Worth Fire Department
Less than 5,000 Sq. Ft.
5,001 to 10,000 Sq. Ft.
10,001 to 25,000 Sq. Ft.
25,001 to 50,000 Sq. Ft.
50,001 to 75,000 Sq. Ft.
75,001 to 100,000 Sq. Ft.
100,001 or More
$20
$25
$30
$45
$75
S95
$95 + S15
For Each
Addjtjonal
50,000 Sq. Ft.
Bedford Fire Department
Less than 5,000 Sq. Ft.
5,001 to 10,000 Sq. Ft.
10,001 to 25,000 Sq. Ft.
25,001 to 50,000 Sq. Ft.
50,001 to 75,000 Sq. Ft.
75,001 to 100,000 Sq. Ft.
100,001 to 200,000 Sq. Ft.
200,000 or More
$15
$25
$30
$40
$60
$75
$100
$200
e
e
e
Page 2
Inspectjon Fees Contjnued
Lewjsvjlle Fire Department $25
Arljngton Fire Department No Fee
Hurst Fjre Department No Fee
Grapevjne Fjre Department No Fee
Coppell pjre Department No Fee
Euless Fjre Department No Fee
e
e
e
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
~~
~
V
No. IR 91-76
Date:
July 8, 1991
Subject:
Re-engagement of KPMG Peat Marwick for Fiscal
Year 1990/91 Audit
The City Council originally selected KPMG Peat Marwick to perform
the annual audit for the City in August 1981. The initial
contract was for five years. That contract expired at the
conclusion of the audit for fiscal year 1984/85. An extension
was granted in February 1986 for three years and again in July of
1989 for an additional three years.
The current contract will expire at the conclusion of the audit
for fiscal year ending September 30, 1991. The re-engagement
letter to affirm the KPMG Peat Marwick contract and approve the
audit fee is awaiting my signature. The fee for this year's
audit will be the same as last year or a fee not to exceed
$36,225.
It is the suggestion of staff that City Council consider looking
at the alternatives of retaining Peat Marwick or requesting
proposals from other firms for future audits. Guidance is
requested from City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
¡)I \ .
L;~' ðH{M~
/ /
C. A. Sanford
Assistant City Manager
_ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS
~
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 91-7R
e
~
c::::::: x ::::::::=-
.~~
Date:
July 8, 1991
Subject:
Parks and Recreation Brochure - Recognition
The North Richland Hills Parks and Recreation brochure, "Leisure
Celebration" was recently the subject of an article in the Course
Trends publication of the Learning Education Resources Network. The
Course Trends magazine is a trade journal published and distributed
throughout the united states and Canada. The Learning Education
Resource Network is a national professional organization specializing
in the marketing and promotion of recreation and continuing education
programs.
vickie Loftice, Assistant Superintendent of Recreation, attended a
LERN Conference this past year and implemented many new ideas into
the brochure layout and design. The brochure contributed
significantly to our largest recreation program enrollment ever.
Respectfully Submitted,
-=-\~
Jim Browne
Director
4IÞ Parks and Recreation Department
ATTACHMENT: "Before and After: How to Set a Record Enrollment",
Course Trends, June, 1991.
e
_ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NOATH AICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS
~
e
KIM Registrar+
Managing Registration ...
The KIM series of management sys-
tems for continuing education and staff
development represent a commitment
to the business of education. We bring
improved productivity and increased fu-
ture attendance through better market-
ing and client relations.
Regardless of your title. one of your
primary interests is to provide the high-
est quality program or series of pro-
grams possible for your participants. The
less time you are required to spend on
the administrative aspects of managing a
program means you have more time to
pay attention to the program itself.
KIM Registrar+ and associated sys-
tems provide a prfessional approach to
meeting management.
e
Building Marketing ...
The attributes you assign at registra-
tiQn become codes you use later to
assemble mailing lists. These lists market
other programs likely to be of interest to
each participant. Your marketing in-
creases in sophistication as you are able
to "target" your publicity.
Special Offer!
e
For a limited time, you can receive:
The basic KIM Registrar+ system.
One year's maintenance. including sup-
port. continuing toll-free phone con-
sultation and problem solving -- a $300
valu e!
Free two-day training for up to two
staff members at LERN Headquarters.
All for only $995, the regular base
system price!
This offer is for LERN members
only, and space is limited. so act now
for this special offer!
For information, contact Kim
Brecheisen. Conference Coordinator,
at 1-800-678-LERN, or FAX: (913)
539-7766.
4
Before and After:
How to Set a Record Enrollment
After staff of the City of North Richland
Hills attended the LERN national conference,
they went back home and made revisions in
their brochure, based on infonnation from
the conference. The brochure cover below
demonstrates the changes from their original
design and fonnat. The brochure, which
brought in a record enrollment, also featured
a revised table of contents, registration page,
and back page.
This brochure drew record enrollments.
".......... . . IIw '''' II
...··-··-··-··--l···
.. Table of .
Contents ,
)l)uth . . . . . . . · · . . . . . . . · · . . 4 t
Gymna~tics ......... .. , . . . S :
BaUet " Tap, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s I
Sp«ìalEwnu I
(Aru & Crafts Show. Eastff :
In The Park) . .. .. . . . . . . .. i ,
Teen4S ....................8
f'itness Center .. . . . . . . . . . . 10
Health ~itness . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Aerohics .. It . . .. . .. . It .. 12
Spccia(nl~r~t ........... 13
'I Senior Lifestvles .. .. , . ... .IS
Clubs .. . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 t
Thtrapeutic Re\.'1'eation .... 16 ¡
I AlhlftiCS ................ 17 j
Community .: .. . .. . . .. .. . 19 ,.
Summer PrevIeW .. .. . .. .. . 20
Facility In(ormation . . . . . . . 21 t
R~\'ations ............. 21
Cltntrallnformation ......22
Jtesistration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 .
.~ ..'i\
, I·", L .. ~,
! i' ~J t~
,.- :'t : ~ y . ','.:\ ~~
~ ',;>" ~.
<.,........<.~. . . 'lflth,u
¡ ':
~ ~¥¡
'" -.-..I"rr-L I
aVWU' "
..~_.... . . _'''' s
~ i~h~~ .
;:::.:',:"::::~:-~~'
, (f. . \ 'I Jt
~ :.~:...,,:::.:'::~'.:::~~~4.~;: .:'.. ,~..<".:..1..:~ ..: .,.;.,ò
,........ . ._'_n
....-...--....-...-...-....,--...;
Using graphics on the contents page
increases readership.
nii)i ·>f1.f**~t"-'~f.t~fAii'ií~~..t:frï
I~M ':>"';''t! < . '~~' I
';y ~if, iM¡.p q ;':' . ;t
t;~~1' ~i~s~~eAE~i~~~~ii~~! . ~
:~I" (¡" .<y.." H.~".., 11"" I"." .:
- ::<.. I':,,·~~ Ii. RKN';I,j"" 1
I <H~.·:::~~ï4,~ ~
;; L.::=~ ~>. ;,j
~~. ....~~:~ P;:',~.1
1~~.$1$t ~~.Ial-·
L~.... :$\~'?*~~t.>'tX) .... . ;·:::t~.1lli~~~;~..~../~.
This is the original brochure design --
before changes.
Re~istratìo.~. . ...... ..."
1·7S~~i?tEt§í.~Ii;;:2··
._:....._~.....~.......I...... "............-..........~. ........~ t.........n._
.......~.~=~~£;:~~~~~~::~
~âg~.:::.:.=.::::.:-',dl :?;;;~:~ª£¿¿==
!!~~~ii~¡i!~
i~~~0:·~.:;:;~~3
.....u_~..............:-......__,u...._. ,~----..~'.;..;.:~~...;,~~~.;.;y..~.......-:.. :-.:
~;_...-........-........
-...............~.---
,,"'... .......: I.....~ ......,..-.-..........~... ........._.-.... ,.....__ f."""'"
.:-......., -. _, -. - 1M '~r'" _.~ _.".~.... -.... _..._....
~....~..._....,.......---...:O:-""~<.';~ .;
......."...-.. ......~r-'.M>..::::::::::.:::.:::::.:
Clear presentation of registration
infonnation and using two enrollment fonns
can help increase registrations.
For more infonnation on the 1991 LERN
Conference scheduled for Nov. 21-23 in
Philadelphia, call Kim at 1-800-678-5376.
Course Trends, June 1991
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 91-79
Date:
July 8, 1991
Subject:
Texas Forest Service - certificate of Merit
The North Richland Hills Parks and Recreation Department was recently
awarded a "certificate of Merit" for outstanding community service
through the improvement of the urban environment. The "certificate
of Merit" was presented by the Texas Forest Service and the Texas
Urban Forestry council as a part of the Texas Urban Forestry Awards
Program.
The North Richland Hills Urban Forestry Initiative, headed by Tim
Hightshoe under the direction of Jack Giarcomarro, was submitted for
award consideration by the Department. Since starting an urban
forestry program in North Richland Hills two years ago, the Parks and
Recreation Department has:
_ constructed two (2) tree farms with "drip system" irrigation.
_ conducted a city-wide tree inventory on public grounds.
_ completed tree planting projects at municipal buildings,
city parks and numerous medians throughout the city.
Approximately 1,500 trees have been planted on city grounds, parks
and tree farms or have been distributed to our citizens through this
program.
The Parks and Recreation Department is currently in the process of
applying for two (2) grants for tree planting programs administered
through the Texas Forest Service.
Respectfully Submitted,
+~
Jim Browne
Director
Parks and Recreation Department
ATTACHMENT: certificate of Merit
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTtl·RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS
w.I
U
-
~
w.I
~
t;;"
~ w.I C
~. ~
o
--
~
~
...
..I
-
u
z
=
o
u
~
...
«-"
w.I
r¥
o
--
z
-<
=
=
~
~
...
w.I
=
I-
Cf)
.........
~
E-4
Cf)
o
~
~
<
ª
~
e
~
b'
~
~
~
a
~
~
B~
~
~
~
a
~
~
~
~
.i::
~o
'?:
V)
Q)
V) Q)
~ ....
e .4-J
Q)-C
~~
> .4-J ~
Q) c: 0
-- Q).... ~
-5 EJ2 (1)~
tò c c.c:ð
üe.Q~~
e -- .4-J -- OJ
~ > -- E
c: c: c: c:
l) Q) bOO ~
L.. 0·- ~
oeu~ð
~ ~ Q)"Qj~
Q) -e .... · a.. r-
bO :J _5 E ~
.5 ~ ü 0 .9
-u .4-J c: u
~ bI) ~
t;; .5
~ u
::J c:
o ~
.... ..c
J2 ~
c:
--
"'-
a
~
u
~ ~
QJ .-
.c ..
~ r-
.~ .~
.I::. c.
~ <
c
o
c
(1)
.~
lJ
\j.
=
c..
W')
~
~
~
£~
'--I-
o~
w.I
=
o
w.
Z
<
=
=
=
~
~
I-
e
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CI1Y
COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CI1Y HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JUNE 24, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order June 24, 1991, at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Tommy Brown
Byron Sibbet
Mack Garvin
Mark Wood
Jo Ann Johnson
Charles Scoma
Linda Spurlock
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilwoman
e
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
C.A. Sanford
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
Absent:
Lyle E. Welch
Councilman
2.
INVOCATION
Councilman Garvin gave the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 10, 1991
APPROVED
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the minutes of the June 10,
1991 City Council meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
June 24, 1991
Page 2
e
5.
PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
None
Sergeant Pitts and Officer Beale presented a plaque to the Council for the City's support of Desert
Storm.
6.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION OF "LANDSCAPE OF THE MONTH" AWARD
FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 1991
Mayor Brown and Janice Davis, Beautification Committee Chairman, presented the "Landscape of
the Month" award for June to NCNB, 6100 Rufe Snow Drive and Shadow Creek Apartments, 6715
Buenos Aires.
e
7.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION OF "YARD OF THE MONTH" AWARDS
FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, 1991
Mayor Brown and Janice Davis, Beautification Committee Chairman, presented the "Yard of the
Month" awards for the month of June to: Mr. and Mrs. Curtis Cheek, 660 Briley; Mr. and Mrs.
Don Tyner, 7108 Bermuda Court; Mr. and Mrs. Frank Kujak, 6729 Mabell; Mr. and Mrs. Frank
Pilarski, 7740 Red Oak; Mr. and Mrs. Travis Daniel, 6816 Corona; Mr. and Mrs. Phillip Norman,
8004 Clark Drive; Mr. and Mrs. Bennie Dennis, 6655 Chilton Drive; and Mr. and Mrs. John
Depuma, 6613 Hillside Court.
8.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Councilman Scoma removed Items No. 16 and 17 and Councilman Garvin removed Item No. 10
from the Consent Agenda.
9.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(14, 15, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 & 27)
APPROVED
e Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve the Consent
Agenda.
Motion carried 6-0.
June 24, 1991
Page 3
e
10.
PS 91-06 REQUEST OF NORTHRIDGE II JOINT VENTURE FOR
REPLAT OF LOT lR AND LOTS 27R THROUGH 48R, BLOCK 4,
NORTHRIDGE ADDITION (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HARWOOD ROAD
AND BOB DRIVE)
APPROVED
Councilman Wood abstained from discussion due to conflict of interest.
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Scoma, to approve PS 91-06 as recommended
by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Motion carried 5-0; Councilman Wood abstaining.
e
11.
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF LONE STAR COMPANY'S RATE
INCREASE REQUEST - COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON
Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to reconsider Lone Star Gas
Company's rate increase request.
Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, Councilmen Garvin and Wood, Councilwomen Johnson
and Spurlock voting for and Councilman Scoma voting against.
12.
GN 91-81 LONE STAR GAS RATE INCREASE REQUEST
ORDINANCE NO. 1742
APPROVED
Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No. 1742.
There was discussion on the increase in cost to the School District.
Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, Councilmen Garvin and Wood, Councilwomen Johnson
and Spurlock voting for and Councilman Scoma voting against.
13.
GN 91-86 ADOPTING A FRANCHISE WITH LAIDLAW
WASTE SYSTEMS (SUNBELT), INC.
ORDINANCE NO. 1745
APPROVED
June 24, 1991
Page 4
e
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No. 1745.
Mr. Herb Allred, representative from Laidlaw, spoke in favor of the request.
Councilman Garvin amended his motion, seconded by Councilman Wood, to include an indemnity
clause in the agreement.
Ms. Mary Smith, representing North Hills Mall, advised Council North Hills Mall would like to take
bids from other waste haulers.
Staff advised Ms. Smith the Manager of North Hills Mall and Laidlaw should meet and try to work
out the problem.
Motion carried 6-0.
e
*14.
GN 91-87 CONSTRUCTION OF EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING
APPROVED
*15.
GN 91-88 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING JOINT ELECTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 91-24
APPROVED
16.
GN 91-89 AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 1554 -
BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
ORDINANCE NO. 1746
APPROVED
Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No.
1746 with the following changes: change first function to "increase community awareness of
beautification issues"; change second function to "provide opportunities for community education
relating to beautification issues"; change third function to "include special community wide events
relating to beautification issues"; and change fourth function to "make recommendations on
ordinances, policies, and landscape plans on major projects on city property relative to
beautification" .
Motion carried 6-0.
June 24, 1991
Page 5
e
17.
GN 91·90 APPOINTMENTS TO THE CHARTER REVISION COMMISSION (1991)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-23
TABLED
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to table Resolution No. 91-23.
Motion carried 6-0.
18.
GN 91-91 RENAMING OF THE GLENVIEW CENTER
RESOLUTION NO. 91-25
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet, to approve Resolution No. 91-25.
Motion carried 6-0.
e *19.
PU 91-18 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM HARVEY AND REDA HARRIS
FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF BURSEY ROAD (PARCEL #8)
APPROVED
*20.
PU 91-19 PURCHASE OF TRACTOR AND MOWING UNIT FOR PARKS DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
21.
PW 91-18 PUBLIC HEARING ON LEVYING A SCHEDULE OF CHARGES FOR THE
DRAINAGE UTILI1Y SYSTEM
ORDINANCE NO. 1741
RECESSED
Staff gave a short summary on action previously taken on this item. There had been several
changes in the law pertaining to drainage utility since the last time this item was discussed. Mayor
Brown had withdrawn his signature from the original ordinance because at that time a three-fourth's
vote was required. Attorney for the City was to request an opinion from the Attorney General on
the action previously taken.
tþ
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Cliff Stevens, 9201 Kirk Lane, had questions on who would be assessed.
Mr. Stevens was advised that at this point it had not been worked out.
June 24, 1991
Page 6
e
Mr. Doug Long, 1615 Precinct Line Road, Suite 106, Hurst, had questions on the way the fee would
be applied.
Staff responded.
Mr. Bob Bartley, 7424 Continental, wanted to know how the fee would be applied.
Ms. Myrtis Byrd, 7312 Hialeah Circle West, asked since the Council had now found the fees would
vary, did it void the legal notice.
Attorney for the City replied no.
Mayor Brown recessed the hearing until July 8th at 7:30 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet advised there would be a work session on this item July 1st at 6:30 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, for the Attorney for the City to
request an opinion from the Attorney General.
e
Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, Councilmen Wood and Scoma and Councilwomen
Spurlock and Johnson voting for and Councilman Garvin voting against.
*22.
PW 91-19 AWARD OF BID FOR VALLEY PARK ESTATES SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*23.
PW 91-20 APPROVE CONTRACT FOR ENHANCEMENT STUDY FOR BURSEY ROAD STREET
AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
APPROVED
*24.
PW 91-21 AWARD OF BID FOR CRANE ROAD SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*25.
PAY 91-06 APPROVE PAYMENT FOR AIR CONDITIONING TO
AMERICAN AIR AND HEAT
APPROVED
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
7/8/91
Department:
Subject:
Public Hearing for Consideration of Amendment to
Council Meeting Date:
PZ 91-09
Agenda Number:
Zoning Ordinance #1080 Regarding Carnivals and
Special Events.
Ordinance #1748
The City has in the past occassionly received requests from various civic and community
non-profit organizations seeking permission to hold fund raising events. For example,
last year the YMCA on Davis Boulevard was denied a request to use a small carnival as an
attraction for a year end fund drive. Unfortunately, the Zoning Ordinance does allow
this use.
During discussions regarding a proposed ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission
requested the staff to survey carnival and special event regulations from neighboring
cities. According to the results of the survey, cities address this problem in a
variety of ways. For example, some cities have a special ordinance regarding carnivals
and special events, whereas other cities may include a provision for carnivals in their
zoning ordinance. The following is a brief description of the results of this survey.
Haltom City - The regulation pertaining to carnivals is a separate ordinance apart from
the zoning ordinance. A carnival event is allowed virtually anywhere in the city
provided that a permit is obtained from the Police Chief.
Grapevine - This city requires special permission be granted by the City Council for
carnivals, fairs and special events. The City Manager may approve such an event when
the request is made by a civic or non-profit organization.
Hurst - This city has a separate ordinance regulating carnivals which requires a permit
from the City Secretary. In addition, this use is only permitted in the Outdoor
Commercial Zoning District.
These were the only cities responding to our request.
The staff has prepared the attached proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding
carnivals and other special events. This ordinance, if approved, will allow a carnival
or special event on non-residentially zoned properties when sponsored by a civic or
non-profit organization and only when the site contains a minimum of six open acres. No
fee will be charged applicants for such a permit issued under this provision. However,
the City Council may want to establish a fee for this permit when other permit fees are
considered at some point in the future.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other ~ ~
3~H~_ ß~ t2 ~__- ,
- partment Head Signature ,- tyPJIanager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
I Finance Director
Pa e 1 of
2
Page 2
July 8, 1991
e
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of this amendment
at their June 13th meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider
the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
e
e
e
e
.
June 24, 1991
Page 7
*26.
PAY 91-07 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.2
IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,417.82 TO AXON, INC. FOR
WATAUGA ROAD IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*27.
PAY 91-08 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 12
IN THE AMOUNT OF $0.00 TO CIRCLE "C" CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
FOR MACKEY CREEK IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II
APPROVED
28.
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
None.
29.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
Tommy Brown - Mayor
A nEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
Page 14
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
e
There were a number of hands raised.
Chairman Brock asked if there was
anyone who had anything different to
say.
No one else came forward so Chairman
Brock closed the Public Hearing.
e
Mr. Barfield said he understands the
attorney has discussed with Councilman
Scoma that you can pick and choose in
the menu, but it has been our
direction that you could not. He said
P & Z has had its hands slapped on a
few occasions when we would pick and
choose. Mr. Barfield said he could
not vote for a zone change until we
get a directive from the City Attorney
on this matter. He said he would like
to table this until they get an answer
from the City Attorney.
Mr. Lueck asked Mr. LeBaron if
something has changed that P & Z does
not know about.
Mr. LeBaron said we just have to take
the directive from the City Attorney.
Mr. Bowen asked if we do zone it 1-2
for a cabinet shop and if he wants to
fall to something else, what would he
fall back to, C-2, I-I?
Mr. LeBaron said he could not answer
that.
Mr. Barfield said he felt we should
give the owner of the property a
chance to address these issues.
Chairman Brock said it seems it is the
consensus that if it is not used as a
cabinet shop, it should be left C-2.
e
Mr. Collins suggested they leave it
C-2 and the owner come back in for a
specific use permit.
Page 15
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
e
e
PZ 91-11
DENIED
5.
PZ 91-12
Mr. Barfield said we might need to do
that so he will not have to pay more
fees, but he thinks we should give him
the chance to come back and address
the issues. He said the Chairman can
re-open the Public Hearing at that
meeting.
Mr. Bowen said you cannot use a
specific use. He said if you have a
specific use, you have that use plus
all the other uses. He also stated
that specific use for a cabinet shop
is not allowed in C-2.
Mr. Barfield made a motion to table
this request until the next meeting
until the City Attorney has a chance
to direct us if we can pick and choose
items in the industrial zoning and
give the owner a chance to address
this issue. This motion was seconded
by Mr. Bowen. The motion failed by a
vote of 3-4 with Lueck, Marin, Collins
and Miller voting against.
Mr. Collins made the motion to deny
PZ 91-11. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Marin and the motion carried 4-3
with Brock, Bowen, and Barfield voting
against denial.
Mr. Bowen stated that his vote against
denial was just to allow the requester
to have a say.
Public Hearing for request of Oscar
Trevino Jr. with J.L. Steele, . to
rezone Lots 1 & 2, Bloc eacham
Addition, from th· resent
classificat· R-2 Single Family
Resid to C-2 Commercial. This
erty is located on the west side
of Smithfield Road between Guy Street
and Arthur Drive.
Chairman Brock opened the Public
Hearing and called for anyone wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
.... ,
.
EJl./'
;"
,I ·
.
.. ~ ,
, I',
~ :ì1~t~~t~~~}:'~~~:~ ~~~~;J ;:~~:~~tf~i.·
~i~:" .. -~~ U J ;: 0 ,.~.. ..f...~:....
~ ~ ë.i~ .." ~ lr~ ,::'J= ;:.-
~ (I; Q' ~ ~ ci I i~ j1~.;~~.
~ D: >-:> .,. ~ 11~ ~ ~ -.
IOw·..q ~o t:Ja ~.'
: '-. > : g \ ! ). rl
1 ~ ~ « ~ ~ t!s i'
., "" ..... /'I!.:.: _ . .
~ .,.~..." :I :.J ,}
~ i'¡: v-:. ::z \l' ~.... .! ~
:; ......." ...c( .c( ~... . r ~
.; _J -J > x ': .' .L· ~
~ 0) --: ~ LoU' ~ ~:~ ~ 'J; .\ ¡
. ¡. ~ >- I- ~ .., ',.,~.
I ..- M" d
I ¿. ~ ~ · >~. h .
I~~~~~~ :~r-~~, ~I'i
Z~~:X:.w I
Ij A'C:=O~ 0 _..~ ~ , ;~
" ~ ~I ~ t
I L... ~ t..:..:. ""? :: :. ~ l',l- - \.
. .... t- <- t'I'
= CJ"'~~ ~~ · I!
! Ú ~~ :: - ': 'I' II I~
If~ ::: '~i I
I : I
---- ..--.~
~ ._.,;;:~ !
i .' " ~__~.- .
I H.~.c;~';:-··:=~
~l lL - -.."'..
ï1 . .."....
e
; . ~. , -..... '. ~.' .' ( :.~
.,--,. 1 , ,~t ""'~··~S ~ ,,:...,.1"."
: ].g~¡ .\,. . a_wU'" . , ~.
~ ~~ r'~') :', " '. t'
. "I~.~ ~ ~ \' " .' .'.. ~ .... '. .
: n~l~~~D~~:·1::~··';~-:;!1 , \U.~
...... t:. u .- ,,-.... .\, ~;
",~~,' r"'-' 1 ,
5.C~rv ~I~
. .. _.~.. .... £uless,-1exas
'( . -;
..- ;..u",,-
'..
-E~___J '-
I 'r')
/4 I ,¿f,II
~ V '-"'.
! ;\
~\
..... ..
. .' ...., 4,":'~;;. ~.. :.
9 /' .:; / i . , '-. '., I
. . ~~"o~o/' ~'.',
/~' " .I'" f .þ
t.~1 ':J /",r'
~........ U
.f ~:/.~(J /-/<' ,:--..:~-
-:p '2.
,4S~;~~~~ 7'
S r" 'Ý ¡" . r? c, 'øJ/~1 7 .J' ~ ·
,.~ .-.-...;J - --~-----'..(..--,
II '\.. I h ".;r.:- ~ I I
~ ~t.t~/,t" R . I ~
I ¿M,¿O tt
I (.;s~
.A ,~~ .~:)
, 1~
... ~'
~ J~
N~
r~
fr~
IltJ~' I S
,!! ~ ~
n~ d ~
i' '~ 0.
.~¡; (,Ì)
"~J i Ii 0
~ I' ¡ J ~.,'J ,l'.
~. d I\J J
I ¡i t'l $ ,,") !j
I ! ~\' :; J j)
~ I -J f\) ...I'~'
'i I UJ '
1:(;' ~
( II £ 5
\.1/ ~ I~
J j "
I ¡ I ÌJ) ~~
· i~
I~
I if ,
Ii!
. f
,II
fÏ
. j
¡ Ie"',
t· \.
1 f
L~~':.::4~~:?·-;'!:?r:. ).j'~.~~~~.. ~_~:.:..:~.
I -. .,' .J ..'~ r I L ~ r i' ¿<:;·1.:1, .:::- ¡
___ _--.'4 - - ___I
( (7-/ ,~' /~/ C· 014,/ '.:J'-.:J HE
"-,." \(. Q r\";~' C ~',AI fI! T'1 'J ,.. ~ :~ 't. ~ " r ,. &. "I
't('f~ 3...\~
\}....., S~~
\.> ~,.~.. ~
.\:~ '
~.\
~
~
. . ..
.. I' ) .. , : ... r ."."
,.1"1' ..'~.. ~
. .~ -:'.~ ~ : ::'.
: :: ~.::: ~.; ;.~; . ~;oj ;:! :,::
. .-,..\
.. ·!:!'··~·.·I~:·
.'f..<::;~ ?
. ..;;~;~t~;:·
. ~,. '. ~:.
. .O:\~ :¡>~~~~;! :.
, '.. ,,' '-il" f I.
0' :..~'~: o· ~~ :~:¡~~ j ~
.- . ... ! t
... :...:::~~:{~ < ¡
:. ~:'1 · , . #..
~ ~~'o:}\2~4';
h .., '\"¡.. .~ ...
t~ ~'.. ¡' :1" .... . ~ . ,:1 ..~
p : .'\};:~\',.?~~\
~ ,.. I' '9-.. ."
~: : /; ::i~;.:·l: ., ,', .~,~ "
.. :, ( '~,. \
," " \
,; }ii~~?~!:
:::o:~~~~;~}
. -. I .
". ') . ;'. .r. ~.
. ;... ..... , :
.~r., .i¡
. r .
-,' ~ ~
i
'.:''i..
~,
~
~
~
~ .t~
Q ~
\)
$"1."
~\-:-,--.,
! ,;~--
t '-"J
q ~)
: :1 " , ' \ .'
. ; ; ~,~ ~L
! -- ~! rJ j
: ...,:~
~
.." ~
L_¿~__
(.')
,~
~
'\
~~
....
~'.
(~
" \
{,.,
'-"\
\':,
~,
~·u
.., .
,
~
~. ('~ I
-. .
'I VeJ!
~ .
~ I
: I
~)
, I
~
~) :
~ ~ I
\)1
~
I
~
I
J
S"J.r
7l?/-ïC T
7
. .
..". ~ ~
i
, ~. ~
... .111. III.
. ',.' ~. ':
. ~.:.
i ~::..:~' \
.' .:~ ., ".: ,'~
,. .~ }
-, ~.. \
" ~F.',;
,. , ',,' ,. :~.~
. , c' : ~
. -I!J'~:~
Pl~J~1? O:! · . ~~.
.: ~ '.~.
'l"r~"'..CT 7 ~ Of! JOZ{ZJ 0 r; .~':;:.;!~O!j I .,A I'
~ECOND Frz,IK3 ø TD rzz;:j CZ'¡ò'l .....~t'~:·:t
r\ '7 )...~..~~.~.,..J r'''-r''''i{ 1À 1\"-':'" t~r.-:~ f n .> :.
u .. .. \~ ~.;. 4. L .. .... L \.. ¿',: .~..... 4 W .~.;;...;;....~ ~ . ~ . '.' .. ! :
CO~,"".",....~, "i""=-~"'..". ('" '\~~"'.~r:-"'<!"'.~~ r e. ;~
"i'.'\Rru~rJ"L' Ult" J. À ø .. ¿'..;J.~:> ~n..-r"',,"~"":'''...uI .. :i.:
,,_,'0 P! ~.~..T ,.,r":~O":')·;Y1T"\ ~,'t ~ ~.....'1 ,,~'\ ~7":- ,.~ · .~~ - ,!
__ _ A'...,.. ~WJ""~ 4*4.J V\;.~,,-!·:....... .-..
3Sa-"I~... I'';~.G~~ ::;..".~ r:';3I~ :-:~'.:.~,)~..:l::~~. '!'
..... " ....~:~
'r~!~p~:J·~T C(''':,.¡i.~-i:·«¡ ~ '1~=~.:.-..;~,,:-_--- ._--~.;:'~.:':
~I·..f :~~f;;~
e
ORDINANCE NO. 1747
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-91-11 the following described property shall
be rezoned from C-2 to 1-2.
BEING Tract 7, John's Addition, Second Filing, an addition to the City of
North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-79,
Page 32, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard, south of the
railroad.
4IÞ DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF MAY, 1991.
ZONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-91-11 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
e
ATTORNEY
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
7/8/91
Department:
Council Meeting Date:
Public Hearing for Consideration of an Amendment to PZ 91-15
Agenda Number:
Subject:
Zoning Ordinance #1080 Regarding Day Care Centers and
Kindergartens in U-Institutional Zone
Ordinance #1749
Attached is a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Day Care Centers.
The proposed Ordinance if approved will allow a Day Care Center/Kindergarten to be an
allowed use in the U-Institutional Zoning District. Presently, many churches and
private schools operate day care facilities. However, the Zoning Ordinance does not
allow this use in the U-Institutional zone. It seems appropriate to add the Day Care
Center/Kindergarten use to this zone since many of the same physical characteristics
exists for day care centers as do churches and private schools. The Planning and Zoning
Commission reviewed and recommended approval of this amendment at their June 13th
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider
the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Ot
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
-
,; (( V~
ment Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
P A 1 nf
e
1
ORDINANCE NO.
1749
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING
ORDINANCE 1080 , THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO
ALLOW A DAY CARE/KINDERGARTEN AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE nUn
( INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning commission of the ci ty of North
Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for
amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the Comprehensive zoning Ordinance,
by changing the said ordinance as set forth herein.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, Section 18.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to add the
following:
4IÞ 18.2.8 Day Care/Kindergarten
2.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention
of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses
and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be
declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidi ty or
unconsti tutionali ty shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since
the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
3.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force
and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance.
e
e
e
2
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage and publication as provided by the North
Richland Hills Charter and the laws of the state of Texas.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS ~ DAY OF JUNE
1991.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS
1991
DAY OF
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
June 13, 1991
e
Chairman Brock asked if the
sign a covenant regardin
sign a
said they are satisfied with the
comments, but was a little unhappy
with the wording of the last
sentence in item 3.
Mr. Joslin said
covenant.
PS 91-09
APPROVED
Mr. Collins m e the motion to approve
PS 91-09 sect to the Engineer's
comments This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bo n and the motion carried 5-0.
2.
PZ 91-14
C sider request of the City to rezone
locks 1 through 4, Woodland Oaks
Addition, from the present
classification of R-2 (Single Family
Residential) to R-2 2300. This
subdivision is located on the west
side of Precinct Line Road, north of
Martin Drive.
e
Chairman Brock stated they had the
Public Hearing on this request at the
last P & Z meeting, tabled it, and now
brought it back tonight for a
decision.
Mr. Miller made the motion to deny
PZ 91-14. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion to deny
carried 4-1 with Ms. Marin voting
against denial.
3.
PZ 91-15
Public Hearing to consider an
amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 to
allow Day Care Centers/Kindergartens
in the U-Institutional Zoning
District.
Chairman Brock opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this amendment to
please come forward.
e
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
June 13, 1991
e
PZ 91-15
APPROVED
4.
PZ 91-09
e
There being no one, the Chairman
called for those wishing to speak in
opposition to this amendment to please
come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
Chairman Brock closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Bowen said he felt this was
something they had just overlooked and
think it is a good thing to correct
it.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PZ 91-15. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Miller and the motion carried 5-0.
Public Hearing to consider an
amendment to Zoning Ordinance
regarding Carnivals and other
events.
Chairman Brock said the Co sion has
taken a long hard look a is, Mr.
LeBaron has checked w· several other
cities to see how t handle
carnivals and sp al events, and now
has prepared ordinance which reads
as follows: Carnivals, circuses and
special d raising events sponsored
by a ic entity, civic or
non rofit organization located within
City may be held for a period not
exceeding seven days on an open site
containing at least six acres in any
non-residential zoning district,
provided that adequate parking and
sanitary facilities are made available
to the satisfaction of the Building
Official. There shall be at least 180
days between subsequent events at the
same location and/or by the same
sponsor. No reduction in any minimum
zoning requirement shall be affected
by such activity. To protect nearby
residents, the Building Official shall
establish the terms and conditions for
the temporary use at the time of
approval."
e
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.epartment:
Subject:
Administration Council Meeting Date: 7/8/91
Appointments to the Charter ReV1Slon
Commission (1991) - Resolution No. 91-23 Agenda Number: GN 91-90
(Tabled at the June 24, 1991 Meetlng)
At the Pre-Council Meeting June 10, 1991, Mayor Brown asked that each Council
member make an appointment to the Charter Revision Commission. State law
requires at least fifteen members. The attached resolution contains the
revised proposed appointees.
RecolDIDendation:
It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 91-23.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget
Other _
a~JL/Z ~)
F - - Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
I Finance Director
Page 1 of
e
e
e
RESOLUTION NO. 91-23
WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is necessary to review the City Charter for
possible changes, additions and corrections; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that a Charter Revision Commission should be
appointed to study the Charter and make recommendations to the Council and the citizens
regarding any changes, additions or corrections.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
A Charter Revision Commission (1991) be and is hereby established.
2.
The following person are appointed as members of such Commission:
Richard Davis, Chairman
Bob Marks
Denny Stout
H.O. Lochridge
Charles Brinkley
Dell Herod
Steve Dunkelberg
Bill Feniken
Lee Pitts
Dennis Horvath
Clint Blackmon
Sherry Christensen
Tom Duer
George Pederson
Gary Cope
e Resolution No. 91-23
Page 2
3.
The Commission is directed to hold such meetings and conduct such investigations
as it deems proper in making recommendations for City Charter changes. It is further
ordered to report its findings and recommendations to the City Council at the earliest
practical date.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 8th day of July, 1991.
APPROVED:
Mayor
ATfEST:
e
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
e
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: 'Pnh li c Works _ Council Meeting Date: 7 /08/91
Basketball Goals and other Obstructions or Hazards
Subject: in tnp ~trp~t Fi g'ht_-Qf-Way - Qrdinance No. 1743 Agenda Number: GN 91-92
II
The Public Works Department and Community Development Department have received several
complaints concerning basketball goals within the street right-of-way. staff has
handled these complaints by appealing to the property owner's sense of public safety
and concern for possible liability should someone be hurt using the goal. Until
recently, this has worked and the property owner would remove the goal. Based on our
current ordinances, we do not have the clear direct authority to have the resident
remove the basketball goal.
The attached ordinance was composed by the Attorney for the City at the request of the
Public Works and Community Development Departments. The staff believes this ordinance
will give us the needed clear authority to request removal of any item within the
street right-of-way which may pose a traffic hazard or create an attractive nuisance
along the City's streets.
The staff has also provided a list of existing basketball goals which will be effected
by the passage of this ordinance. staff has not contacted the owners of these goals
because we have not received any complaints. However, the staff recommends all
existing basketball goals be removed should Council elect to pass this ordinance.
Recommendation:
4IÞ It is recommended that City Council take action on Ordinance No. 1743.
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/ A
Sufficient Funds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_. Operating Budget
., Oth
nt Head Signature ,u ¡e!16~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Fenance Director
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
est of Existing Basketball Goals in Street ROW
ne 18, 1991
Address
-------------~---------------
7940 Arlie Lane
6909 Aston Drive
6737 Bartay Drive
7708 Briar Cliff Court
7709 Briarridge Court
8402 Brookview Drive
5917 Cynthia Court
6913 Daniel Court
3812 Diamond Loch E
4020 Diamond Loch E
3809 Diamond Loch W
6424 Diamond Lock N
7704 Evergreen Ave.
7713 Frankie B Street
6884 Greenleaf Dr.
4808 Grove Street
8025 Hunter Lane
6512 Jerry Court
7808 Johnson Court
7948 Kandy Lane
e 4412 Keeter Drive
5808 Kilarney Court
7023 Lincoln Drive
7308 Moody Court
7808 Odell Street
6204 Onyx Dr. N.
6516 Paula Court
7633 Perkins Drive
7301 Post Oak Drive
7800 Red Oak Lane
7812 Redwood Court
6856 Richfield Drive
7316 Rockdale Court
7709 Rolling Ridge Court
6509 Scarborough Place
5409 Scott Drive
6801 Shady Dale Drive
7413 Shady Hollow Lane
8400 Springbrooke Court
6816 Still Meadows Cir. N
7128 Sweetbriar Court
8958 Tamiami Court
7528 Teakwood Court
7449 Timberhill Drive
5521 Topper Corut
e 5801 Ulster Drive
7254 Windcrest Court
7205 Windcrest Court E
e
e
e
ORDINANCE NO. 1743
WHEREAS, the erection and/or maintenance of fences, poles,
basketball goals, skate board ramps and other structures in the
City right-of-way constitute a danger to the public; and
WHEREAS, the erection and/or maintenance of fences, poles,
basketball goals, skate board ramps and other structures in the
City right-of-way constitute obstructions which interfere with
access to the public right-of-way and public utilities placed
therein; and
WHEREAS, the erection and/or maintenance of a pole,
basketball goal or skate board ramp in the public right-of-way in
close proximity to the traveled portion of the street constitute
attractive nuisances for children which cause a danger to
children who congregate or play in or near the traveled portion
of the public streets.
NOW, THEREFORE, in order to protect the health and safety of
the citizens of the city and to give unimpeded access to public
utilities, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas does hereby ordain:
1 .
That it shall hereafter be unlawful for any person, firm or
corporation to erect or maintain a fence, pole, basketball goal,
skate board ramp or other structure within the public right-of-
way.
2.
The erection and/or maintenance of a pole, basketball goal
or skate board ramp in a public right of way adjacent to the
traveled portion of a public street or within ten feet of a
traveled portion of a public street is hereby declared to be a
public nuisance and shall hereafter be unlawful.
3.
Any person, firm or corporation which violates any portion
of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and
fined not in excess of $200.00. Each day of violation shall be a
separate offense.
4 .
In addition to the criminal penalty set forth in Section 3,
the person, firm or corporation which is in violation of this
ordinance may be given notice by the Director of Public Works of
the City to remove such fence, pole, basketball goal, skate board
ramp or other structure and the said Director of Public Works
e
e
e
shall be, and is hereby, empowered to remove such fence, pole,
basketball goal, skate board ramp or other structure if it is not
removed by the violator within 10 days of such notice.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of
, 1991.
APPROVED:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Subject:
Appointments to Board of Appeals
Council Meeting Date: 7 /8/91
Agenda Number:GN 91-93
Department: Administration
Mr. Joe Crane has resigned from the Board of Appeals. Mr. Michael Dean,
Alternate, has been recommended to fill the vacancy and Mr. Perry Christensen
as Alternate.
Reco_ndation:
It is recommended that City Council appoint Mr. Michael Dean as voting member,
Place 3 and Mr. Perry Christensen as Alternate (Place 2).
Finance Review
e
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
/l ~ ~~
\ Ú.;~../,
tJ Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Ie I)/(~~
City Manager
I Finance Director
Pa e 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
_epartment: Administration Council Meeting Date: 7/8{91
Subject: Appointments to Park and Recreation Board Agenda Number: GN 91-95
Mr. Ron Parks (Place 1) has moved to Haltom City creating a vacancy on the Park
and Recreation Board. It has been recommended that Ms. Karen Allen (Alternate)
be appointed to Place 1 and Mr. David Allen be appointed as Alternate.
Reco_ndation:
It is recommended that Ms. Karen Allen be appointed to Place 1 and Mr. David
Allen be appointed as Alternate.
.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
~$/ ~.nL/:)
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
-
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
-
¡(~~~
City Manager
, Finance Director
Pace 1 of
· .
· CC(Q)~Y
e
Date Réceived:
Received By:
.~
4..-/-41
"-- ~ ./
ð
PROFILE FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS
¡) a v , 'c/ b;.6 S' 0 " .4 / I ~ ÞI
ADDRESS 7/33 /J1eq~... ~,..,I:. ¡Jr.',,#:
EMPLOYER 5' e 1..f'.~.IN ~ e/' E,
NAME
,.,¡~
/Kr#A -I- Á
C-e",+/ -f-,/r/
e~",:5 ~"'s-f-".vc 'I.~
#¡tv
NUMBER OF
YEARS /0/2.
OCCUPATION
PHONE: HOME /118 f",o '7 9 9 - .s-.3 f7
W~FE'S/HUSBAND'S NAME ~~
CHILDREN'S NAME AND AGES /.V~
OFFICE
RESIDENT OF THE CITY SINCE A ¿!//'()A'. /9bO
r
PREVIOUS RESIDENCE 13/ Vð /!?OV4/ h e.q,.
$9 q /h.:;>Þ1/
-'
I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING~ON: (CHECK ONE OR MORE)
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
/ PARKS/.RECREATION BOARD
BOARD OF APPEALS
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
LIBRARY BOARD
BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
AND PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE ON CITY COt4MISSION:
CABLE TV BOARD
t/slT
c;,~.,. f,· -I! e
eJ e rl ~ 1+'1 t:;, ÞIt ¿
/J,e, (/5T/1 r:rA" #/!/( ~ -r/9£ ø
/ /
COMMENT (ABOUT YOURSELF, SPECIAL AREAS OF INTEREST, WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE,
QUALIFICATIONS AND OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION.)
G"Q/v~r~ tP.,ð ¡(;c..1. ?....¿ f/.re ~. /9 ~z. /i,~ ~..~e."'S;T" o-fl ~-!:.$
/ / '
#f'-r ; 76 /1 ... 4~ ~ ~"n/s n r-A~~,'q-.rr #v ,/-,L¿' Q¿..,
tire.",,// ,ðe,el r#vIJ,/"~ é? 1'1",,'5 (!)r'4 4""'.z..,~;,~
/11>0 z: Pi+1 t/e1""7 ;~r.~r:.~re//I? f,...,/r-ð v.:~ V/ð....
-1'1, e..- C ;-f-'7 ~ I ¿¡ /r¡::.¡q/;t Cjt?o/) ~vª /;r7 ¿,~ L ;v/;,7 e. 'Lj ð,>' <::.~
;7 ~l/~ /( ~ f,'¿",T5'.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
_Department: Parks & Recreation Department
Subject: Dan Echols Senior Adult Center
Council Meeting Date: 07 /08/91
Agenda Number: GN 91-96
The "Dan Echols Senior Adult Center", 6801 Glenview Drive is nearing
completion and is scheduled to open on August 5, 1991. The City is
finalizing a contract with Senior citizen Services of Greater Tarrant
County for a staff ·person for the facility. The "move-in" supplies and
furnishings are budgeted at $12,145 and the salary for a center director
of August/September will be approximately $3,000.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Funds for "move-in" items (supplies, office equipment, tables, chairs,
furnis~ings, etc.) were included in the proposed FY 1991-92 budget.
Purchase of these items at this time will preclude the use of those. funds
in next year's proposed budget.
Funds may be allocated from:
01-99-01-5970 Budget Reserve for contingency
$ 15,145.00
To: Senior Adult Services
01-70-04-2900
._ 01-70-04-4800
01-70-04-6500
"Move-In" Supplies
Special services (Center Director)
Office Equipment and Furniture
$
$
$
9,792.00
3,000.00
2,353.00
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested the City Council appropriate funds as indicated above for
"move-in" and operation of the "Dan Echols Senior Adult Center" for the
remainder of this fiscal year, starting August 5, 1991 - September 31,
1991.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
_ Operating Budget _
_ Other "!:: ,_" -! ~.
~~~ dJ~
Department Head Signature y ~ Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance DIrector
Page 1 of
,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
eSUbject:
Publ ic Works _ Council Meeting Date: 7/08/91
Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way from Robert and
Gloria Hesch for the Proposed Construction of Agenda Number: ~u 91-20
Bursey Road (Parcel #11)
The staff has negotiated with Robert and Gloria Hesch to purchase right-of-way from
their land that fronts on Bursey Road. The negotiated price is $2,061.60 equaling
$0.60 a square foot for property that is zoned AG.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of payment for right-of-way on Bursey Road to Robert and
Gloria Hesch in the amount of $2,061.60.
e
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Oper i g Budget
WOth
GO
Finance Review
Acct. Number 13-15-89-6000
Funds Available
. Ftnance Director
nt Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
City Manager
Page 1 of 1
.",
/
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
_
STA't'E OF TEXAS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
That we, Robert L. Hesch and wife, Gloria D. Hesch, as Sellers, for and in
consideration of the agreed purchase price of Two Thousand Sixty-One and 60/100 Dollars
($2,061.60), and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof, hereby grant, sell and
convey to the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County,
Texas as Buyer, a perpetual right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, improving,
widening, maintaining and using a public street with drainage facilities as may be
required and the further rights to construct, improve, operate and maintain water, sewer,
or other public utilities in, under or upon said right-of-way, as described on the plat
attached hereto, which plat is made a part hereof, and/or described as follows:
(SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for
all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special conditions, if any:
1. City agrees to move water meter to front of Seller1s property.
2. City agrees to build separate concrete drive approach into Seller's property,
at no cost to Seller, l2-feet wide by 10-feet deep.
To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its
successors and assigns forever.
Executed this the 10 ~~ day of June, A.D., 1991.
_
/?d'~ ?-;;/~
Robert L. Hesch
~f)~eL/
Gloria D. Hesch
ADDRESS OF GRANTEE:
city of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ~ð ei day of June, 1991 by Robert L.
Hesch and wife, Gloria D. Hesch.
NoJ~li! st~as
My Commission Expires:
Notary's Printed Name:
4-22-98
Mark D. Bradlev
_
t
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
_Department:
Subject:
Public Works Council Meeting Date: : /08/91
Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way from
Eddie and Doris Warren for the Proposed Construction Agenda Number: PU 91-21
of Bursey Road (Parcel #12)
The staff has negotiated with Eddie and Doris Warren to purchase right-of-way from
their land that fronts on Bursey Road. The negotiated price is $2,380.80 equaling
$0.60 a square foot for property that is zoned AG.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of payment for right-of-way on Bursey Road to Eddie and
Doris Warren in the amount of $2,380.80.
e
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
., Oth
GO
. Finance Director
ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
.~~
City Manager
1
Page 1 of
.,/
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
_
STATE OF TEXAS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
That we, Eddie L. Warren and wife, Doris J. Warren, as Sellers, for and in
consideration of the agreed purchase price of Two Thousand Three Hundred Eighty and 80/100
Dollars ($2,380.80), and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof, hereby grant, sell
and convey to the city of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County,
Texas as Buyer, a perpetual right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, improving,
widening, maintaining and using a public street with drainage facilities as may be
required and the further rights to construct, improve, operate and maintain water, sewer,
or other public utilities in, under or upon said right-of-way, as described on the plat
attached hereto, which plat is made a part hereof, and/or described as follows:
(SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for
all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special conditions, if any:
1. City agrees to move water meter to front of Seller's property.
2. City agrees to build separate concrete drive approach into Seller's property,
at no cost to Seller, l2-feet wide by la-feet deep.
To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its
successors and assigns forever.
Executed this the ~~ day of June, A.D., 1991.
_
~J, rX.-4'(2 A__
Eddie L. Warren
¿,..~-'(
~~/gM14~~
Iior is J. rren
SELLERS
ADDRESS OF GRANTEE:
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
This instrument was acknowledged before me on ~ ti day of June, 1991 by Eddie L.
Warren and wife, Doris J. Warren.
~I·./~...*·;;¡:~p..·\.,.
~ U:~~~~ o. BRADLEY
~.~\ '. :,,1 "", :-,·:·.\t'.~S8IOH EXPJRfS
i:.· .....~~~.:.: /~!;rll 1M 1...
" ...~........ ..., ....
Commission Expl.r ":" .-:- ,.~~, ~-:-..;.~
No7::;~l¿ tt~xas
My
Notary's Printed Name:
4-22-98
Mark D. Bradley
_
_
_
_
BURsEY ROAD
~~
i
æ
o
~t
)&...
'j~
ta
I ..
U~
~~
U.
I'ð
.CL
J -
~~
ta1~
8J
Œ.g
CEN'E~,=,INe.
E--, STING, F/!/ttICE,D ".0. w.
-r----__
RO. B. ·
..--
E".,.-r. ~
.~
"2~
0,
~O
"2
'i~
~'),.¡:
t4 .1 e!
a~ a.
'2 ~ -
8>: 10
1úl=
O.J .
-tS ~
-=~~
Š<:I--
ft"\ I ~
\oU ~ ,..
--j J
1--0
3~~
f:Þ ~op 0 5 E P R.o.vV. \..J Nt!..
e;' T!!Mf=ÐIe~ E.sM'T:
,}~
.~IS
Õ
~
en
.\1J~
-~t
õ
.
o
o
'Z.
J
E þ I:) '!!... \-Y foJ N ......., A R ¡;t.e..,... ET u)( gOR t S
vO L· '-+-<"WCl, P6. \ tøZ , ORTc::.:r
JOHN
Ä-3\o
.
CONO~A SURVE.Y
w
.- '~'. L~,
&;k : / ,"ch :: 40 ~-I-
,.
:t:.:-:'.: ~~ iTcr.
ALL '~'1 t ndt ,_ er t ~ 1 r. r r ¡:h.. ~ _·,t· U2 ,..: \,~ : ':. ¡ ~ :,,1d ~-: ¡ t l.la t ed 1 n t he JOHN CONDRA
SURVEY. 'O;::.t(~I-:-t- t-.....'. ~'j('... i~('( ~r,T. I __'.n~;·.. rc::."d.~ ~nc1 ~einq a pClrtion of
the trrlct deSCYlt~d 'n . 'I€-; det-?d ,',' r:jdlf.;- L~...nn ~~.~("rRn etu:-t. DOY1S Jean
recorded in lv',:. 1 ume ..1 E. 5b , F'=-\ge 1 ~:: :.f the O~f?d ~'ec:,=-Yds, Têu"yant County,
Te)~a& ë\na ~T"~.lr'e par t 1" ul-?r' l./ r:,=,SI:'::('! l,,~'j b'.' f..~'te~ ~nd hi'. ,Jnds as follows:
BeginnIng at I..~ (-'SJ~-=:.·rl ·-:t~2·,~=·1
West b,:aunddr y 1 i ne "f sa 1 d JJar'"r en
sa i d t, r =,..:. t b e a y s ~. J ':' r t r r.' 0 ~ e (.J ,,- ~ (' c:
" , '.1 ? 1", ~:'\Îh p ~~ I~ . In I:' a ~ s U Y" V . i n c .:> i nth e
tYac~ f~om wh1ch the Northwest corney of
:-, 1 ,n i nu t es 3'3 see onds East 6. 00 f.eet;
r1 e q (' e e S 't tin J nut; e s
,:1 f I..... a !' !:.. ne ':-' t 8ur'" 3f?:1
, . -',,, - -1 P Ú ~ r~ :. ,.. e ~ 1 ", ~ I j
East w1 th the ex 1St ing
Y~rl~ble width right of
.. I ~ f::' a k c; u Y" V . i n c .) i nth e
Thence South 8S
fenced SQuth rlQht
way.J 230. f:, 2 f ~ ~ t :~
East bl:lunda( ì ~ n~
se.: 1:,nd5
f;' .:. èI. d r a
~tamped
',' f -:¡ -:- 1.-4 ~.., r- r L:.r-I +~" ¡'I: t ;
fherl'- .=; :-: ¡ ILl t h
b I:' u n d "1 (" l l;\ '-?
in c . 'I :. r: t; h ~
_ ,..:.,:, ..:. I I I 1 '7~ W ~- ~
'~ 0 t ~ t;he ::'~.lrj E..~st
~t Jmoed I moak: surv.
SUr" ~ey Rc,ad and a
t·
u u .:--: ü - t t? E:- ¡ r:, .:-.1
1. . ..,I.
::\
:"_'l-,t:)~r t \.
". 1 gr t
,- t l.,Jat ',I l 1 ne 1:1 t
~'-:- ':'D'-'~I:Jd
C Ll r vet I~' ~-: -, ;:=. ~ t._ . t' :
Then,: e '..J 1 t h ".lîe
h a v i n 9 (~ ¡- -~·1 .. :_I:.~
see ü n d '.:~ .
.:::;.:: m 1 n 1.1 ( t:? S
( m ü 6 ~ :: ,_ tl'- .
4".,1 a y 1 ~ Il @ and .: U yo vet 0 the 1 eft
,~¡-,qle ·-:,f 7 degrees 53 tnlnutes 47
.~ l ,".!r) '1 ':. 'ì ;:-,,' f-j I:' f f'J·Yf' t M 85 degye@s
.;1 ",, .~·pped st eel r-,:,d st amped
: ~ . oj C ;- . ~I P . ~ r..;. e':1
-:'.-t('.'. t.~~t~.
r 1 ~ h +; <I f
,~ '.: ·.:on ,.. r ~ 1
, .: ~ t " ~ì j
. ~ ~." ' "I , .' ... .
. .., . ,4 -." I
'.; '"? t 1-. :-1
, .
,. ... -j :
Then,: c ",~.-_,.-;: .3'~
P Y" I:. pc:.:=. ¿. (J1(, 1. a h t "t
( in 0 d ~. = 1_ \ .
'": e ~ <..,r· c ::. ;..Jes t .-:: ·:.n t 1 n Lilli 9 '.,J 1 t h sa i d
to: .-:-. d l:'::" :- apped s t 2~.!1 (" c,d st amped
~ '..', ~~ . f' -; ¿; 1 d ;....J d r .... en t Y' a·: t :
. . ~ . ~J .) r r ~ ~ ~:-
. ,¡ J. ;- t ,
'- -
'.j ~.' ,1 :-,~ t ._8. ~7
~::::.(~t:
- . i = ,·lt~ S t ~ ; ,~ :
1 -1"- ,.
Then.: e ì JI)Y t h oJ\"'
1 ine 1 ~. 83 fpE:-t
1 and. rr: c ( ~::. ."1 r ~.
,.ì¡ ,::ìnu"tp:; '";3 se,-,:,nds West '..Jlth '~alc1 West
:·;l.?..::e ..::·t beg\nnlna and ':c,ntaln1ng Ü.0911
bûundary
Acres of
jegr'e~s
t . _. ~ h r:
DAVID C. MOAK
SURVEyD/tS, INC.
R£8ISTER£D PU.LIC SURVEYOR
P.O. BOX 1054 2.8- 2211
HURST, T£XAS
DATE (ø-U- I ~9 / .... 8iøÞ-S.Ÿ!J-/Z
t.. ,-
~3
¥ .
~. '-'.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Parks & Recreation Department
~Ubject: Park Liqhting Pro; ect
Council Meeting Date: 07 / 08 / 91
Agenda Number:PU 91-22
Bids for the Richfield Park Sports Lighting System Project were opened on
June 28, 1991. The following base bids were submitted:
ComDany
Base Bid
NEMA 3 Electric, Inc.
Dean Electric, Inc.
Barrow Electric, Inc.
$194,949
$197,900
$273,798
The base bid includes sports lighting and security lighting for all six
baseball/T-Ball fields, two (2) football/soccer fields, tennis courts and
the basketball courts. Reusable poles and fixtures will be reconditioned
and installed on the tennis courts, basketball courts, and for security
lights at Norich Park.
NEMA 3 Electric, Inc. was the low bidder with a bid of $194,949.
NEMA 3 Electric, Inc. has an excellent track record in sportslighting
installations throughout the North Texas area and was the contractor for
the Fossil Creek Park sportslighting installation last year in North
Richland Hills.
~The attached project summary discusses in some detail the cost savings
~opportunities of proceeding with the entire project at this time as .
proposed by Staff.
FUNDING SOURCE:
The City Council appropriated $218,900 for the renovation and replacement
of the existing light systems at Richfield and Norich Parks on April 8,
1991 (GN 91-53). There is currently a balance of $210,645 after
engineering, inspection, and design fees in account #01-99-00-6500 which
will be adequate for the following expenses:
Sportslighting Installation
Project/Construction Management (Architect)
Reconditioning of Existing Poles
Best Key Switch and Lock System
Project Sub-Total
Account Balance (Contingency)
$194,949
$ 3,300
$ 1,500
S 1.000
$200,749
$ 9,894
Finance Review
~
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
~ Operating Budget
~ Other _____
-~~~~
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
K:V~
,
City Manager
. Fenance Director
Page 1 of
CITY OF
I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
· _RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council award the park lighting project
contract to NEMA 3 Electric, Inc. in the base bid amount of $194,949.
ATTACHMENT: Park Lighting Project Summary
e
e
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page of
·
RICHFIELD PARX
SPORTSLIGHTING PROJECT
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
The existing lighting system at Richfield Park was originally
installed, with "shop-fabricated" non-galvanized steel poles, by
Public Works personnel in the mid-1970's. Since 1985 there have
been two (2) structural failures due to a combination of internal
rust, wind stress or metal fatigue.
The pole failure in 1985 resulted in six (6) new sportslighting
poles being installed to replace the fallen pole and five (5)
other poles of questionable integrity at that time. The most
recent pole failure was in March, 1990.
The RYA sponsors and programs sports leagues in baseball and
football at Richfield Park. Approximately 1800 youth participated
in this year's sports programs.
e
In March, 1991 the Parks and Recreation Department conducted an
inspection of the light poles in all city parks at the request of
the City Manager's Office. The inspection resulted in the
observance of rust accumulation on the interior of the poles, weld
separations and the discovery of two (2) significant cracks
(approximately eight inches [8"]) on two (2) of the poles.
The City Council, on April 8, 1991, authorized the replacement of
the existing lighting systems and appropriated $218,900 for
project construction costs. The Council also authorized staff to
hire a structural engineer to evaluate the condition of the poles.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S INSPECTION
staff contracted Frank W. Neal & Associates, Inc. to conduct a
structural engineering assessment of the existing poles and bases.
According to Mr. Neal, 75% (18 of 24) of the existing poles around
the ballfields have "experienced sianificant deterioration and
their structural integrity is questionable and warrants
replacement". The six (6) which were replaced in 1985 proved to
be structurally adequate for re-use given that their height and
fixture-bearing capacity could be incorporated into the proposed
sportslighting system design. The structural engineer's
assessment also showed the light poles on the tennis courts to be
adequate for supporting the existina fixtures (one per pole -- see
the following discussion of light levels) but not adequate to
support the additional fixtures necessary for raising the light
e levels to appropriate standards.
~ LIGHT LEVEL TESTING AND ILLUMINATION STANDARDS
In addition to evaluating the structural safety of the poles, the
Staff coordinated a light level test to address a second area of
liability concern. Inadequate illumination can be very dangerous
in sports situations that involve high velocity projectiles, as is
the case in baseball.
The amount of light we currently have on the baseball fields
ranges from 40% - 70% below the minimum acceptable standard. In
addition to not having an adequate amount of light, we also have a
problem with the uniformity of light distribution and glare caused
by poles that are too short for the size of the fields that they
are intended to illuminate. These fields also have poor quality
of light due to two separate types of fixtures, metal halide and
quartz, being indiscriminately distributed throughout the sports
complex.
e
The tennis courts are currently 87% below the minimum acceptable
light level standard. Light level readings were at four (4)
foot/candles in comparison to the minimum standards of 30
foot/candles. The poles on the tennis courts are in good shape
and are the appropriate height. However, for the light level to
meet the minimum standard of 30 foot/candles, it will be necessary
to add additional metal halide fixtures and eliminate the existing
quartz fixtures. The existing poles are not of sufficient
diameter to support the necessary crossarm configuration for the
additional fixtures.
A very cost-effective solution for proper lighting of the tennis
courts and basketball courts will be discussed later in this
report.
PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
The Staff met with sportslighting contractors, consultants,
manufacturer's representatives, engineers and youth sports
representative in order to research and evaluate the most cost
effective approach to completing this project. Staff contracted
with Bland Harper to serve as architect and project manager.
The project specifications were prepared with the following goals
and directives:
e
Safety - A mandate was established to address safety concerns as
the top priority in the design of the new sportslighting system.
The replacement poles must meet a 15 year warranty criteria and
have a minimum wind loading capacity of 80 MPH with a 1.3 gust
factor. The maintained light levels will also meet 100% of the
minimum acceptable light levels. The poles and fixtures are
specified at the appropriate heights and with glare reduction
features to create a safely illuminated play environment for the
users of these facilities.
-
-
.
Economical Design - The new sportslighting system maX1m1zes "pole
sharing" opportunities between fields thereby reducing costs. The
new system calls for nineteen new poles to illuminate eight sports
fields. That is in contrast to the existing 24 poles that
currently only illuminate six (6) fields. We are able, with this
design, to light two additional fields with five (5) fewer poles.
The net result is better light, both in quantity and quality, with
fewer poles, fixtures and associated costs. The average cost for
installation of each pole with fixtures and electrical is $9,000 _
$10,000. (By eliminating five [5] poles through design
improvement a total savings can be estimated at $45,000 -
$50,000.)
Maximum use of Existing Equipment - The structural engineer's
evaluation of the existing poles verified that the six (6)
replacement poles from 1985 were in good condition and provide the
opportunity for continued use. These (6) poles are currently
located on the two (2) largest baseball fields. Unfortunately,
these poles are not the appropriate height or in the correct
locations to be used for relighting the baseball fields. However,
they are the correct height and have the fixture bearing capacity
to light the tennis and basketball courts at the appropriate
levels. The contractor will remove these poles and we will have
them sand blasted, inspected and "powder-coated" prior to re-
installing them on the tennis and basketball courts. The best
existing metal halide fixtures will be removed, cleaned and
reassembled for reuse on these facilities. other fixtures will be
kept for replacement parts or for use on future projects. The
existing tennis court poles can also be cleaned and reconditioned
for reuse at Norich Park. Since the security lighting at that
park will require only one fixture per pole.
The estimated cost savings for the City by reusing and
reconditioning this existing equipment should be between $15,000 _
$20,000.
Special Features - The specifications call for fixtures and system
designs that will eliminate spill and glare concerns. This will
prevent the park lighting from being a nuisance to the surrounding
neighborhoods.
The specifications also call for remote ballasts on the new poles.
This reduces our long term maintenance cost by placing ballasts
and fuses at 10 feet instead of at 50 - 70 feet above ground.
Maintenance costs for renting lift trucks would be greatly
reduced.
Construction Schedule - In order to minimize the City's exposure
to the liability of unsafe structures and inadequate light levels,
the base bid requires a completion date of October 1, 1991.
Completion by this date would also have the least detrimental
effect on the primary user's, the Richland Youth Association, fall
youth football schedule.
~ RELATIONSHIP TO THE PARKS MASTER PLAN
Renovation of the sportslighting system is Richfield Park is
recommended in Chapter V. "Conclusions", p. 65 under Renovation In
Existina Parks.
This project is also in accordance with the policy statement goals
adopted by Council as part of the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan. Goal Number 3 states:
"The Parks and Recreation Department will ensure that
facilities are maintained both for the safety of the
public and also to ensure the longevity of the facilities."
(p. 126)
BASE BID AND DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATES
The base bid includes new sportslighting for four (4) baseball
fields, two (2) football fields and two (2) "T-Ball" fields.
Basketball courts and tennis courts will be illuminated with
approved reusable poles and fixtures currently in existence.
Security lighting between facilities and on parking areas is
included. A completion date of October 1, 1991 are included in
the base bid.
~ Deductive Alternate #1: Eliminate Tennis Court Liqhtinq
(Subtract $5,786) - The poles on the tennis courts are
structurally sound but cannot support the additional fixtures
necessary to increase the light levels to the minimum standard.
By reusing existing poles and fixtures from the baseball fields we
can provide the appropriate level of light at a significant
savings of $8,214 compared to the cost of this work as a separate
project.
Deductive Alternate #2: Eliminate Basketball Court Lighting
(Subtract $4,092) - The basketball courts are currently not
lighted. However, the high frequency of participant uses and lack
of lighted outdoor basketball courts make this alternate a viable
park improvement opportunity in the context of this project.
Reuse of existing equipment make this project very cost effective
in contrast to lighting separately at a later date. Estimated
savings would be $2,908 compared to the cost of this work as a
separate project.
-
Deductive Alternate #3: Eliminate Lighting of T-Ball Fields
(Subtract $18,902) - The Richland Youth Association has
constructed two (2) new "T-Ball" Fields in Richfield Park over the
past two years. These facilities, valued at approximately
$60,000, were constructed with materials purchased by the Richland
Youth Association and built with volunteer labor. These
facilities are not currently lighted but can be illuminated at a
significant cost savings if coordinated with the proposed lighting
project. The estimated savings by "economy-of-scale" would be
$11,098 compared to the cost of this work as a separate project.
· ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST
LIGHTING LIGHTING
FACILITIES AS FACILITIES AS
A SEPARATE PROJECT PART OF THIS PROJECT SAVINGS
Tennis Courts $ 14,000 $ 5,786* $ 8,214
Basketball Courts $ 7,000 $ 4,092* $ 2,908
"T-Ball" Fields $ 30.000 $ 18.902 $11.098
SUB-TOTAL $ 51,000 $ 28,780 $22,220
Engineering/Design $ 4.000 $ 0 $ 4.000
TOTAL $ 55,000 $ 28,780 $26,220
*Using approved existing poles and fixtures from baseball fields.
e
-
The net savings of approving the base bid which includes these
facilities, at this time can be estimated at approximately
$26,220. This "economy of scale" results from the reuse of
existing equipment, non-duplication of design fees, consolidated
transportation cost for poles and fixtures, bid costs, bonding
costs, etc..
This represents nearly a 50% savings on the cost of lighting two
(2) T-Ball fields, two (2) tennis courts and two (2) basketball
courts. Staff recommends including these facilities as part of
the park lighting renovation project.
staff has researched and evaluated this project diligently in an
effort to provide our citizens with the best facility improvement
value for the dollar.
.
p~,.~ !j¡3n
~
I
uL
~
:.'l
_ - Pou::z; SAT1~~~
\
í1:!tJN\ ~ Z
,
tcrvf2.,(S ·
.'
o
o
I~
o
o
,
\P
.
¡
~
100 0 100 200 300
~ ~
SCALE.N fEET
...~~" "',
~""'~~þ
~\1~~-.J1
" ~~
~:~. -:-"_ _ '- ?.f~.J
. ' ...
. . . ....-
---- : ..,--.
, .. .
_u_ ::::; :.:~~/:..:". /
____ :':::. .:\ ,. ,1
____:!...:.:'.. ~.:...... ',1 I
~..:~:. :....: . . ....:.~ /' "
_.__ .... .,. :....,f I I
. .._ i;:·...:.:::·~:·:~:·.:. · '........ .. ,-
fl r MOlnr ~~'.' · · ..'.. . :"
ZJ~. ~ :::. r...::..:" :.:.......~~.;-:::...
RICI-IFIELD P ARI(
I;XISTING CONDITIONS'
01:=TÁIL -=It- i
:-,' <;cHE.~"IC. L-À.'(ouT or- F'ÀRK
IYATAUGA - SAfITIIF/éLO ROAD
.
.
.
.. ---.. - ---------,
~..
~tÞ--~,,/
r1"1
Þ¡::. ,
Or '
~1, /
n6) ,
~~ /'
;oJ¡
Z I" '
/
,
/
1';_ -.l
I+_
td
w I ,00l;
~
I
,
1
,
,
I
I
,
I
,
,
\
\
\
\
\
,
\ .
"
(9 --'-.,..
~,
\
\
t1f
gð~ ero
µ 0 y \" \ \
o 11:p _ ,
o (ß -\
· rn" m
-Þ ~ -;,.. \ I , ~
-It Y
o -
r. 8 ,\-
ò:)/: 1~-
(5t0
C
-{
~cI
,."
þ-
or
..,r
"-
8p
zr
6~
zp
~'
T+-
~ IZ'
"
'\
. ,
,
..,
M
ï
~
-
N
)\
..,
M
r
~
~
~iD
i~
.ÿ1>
i~
I~ I t) ..
..t'+_D
1>
W J-:õf
..
..,
c
9
cø
]Þ
ï
ï
~
~
T,-$--
F'. I~ ~
If
+J>
\
\
\
\
\
"
..
"
" .. ..
c;,
If
~Oj
e;,
I ~
~ J.:
n
:w-1 w .
..' .
)
~
:n
1\
Ž
(â)
~
Do
...,
8
-f
~ ...
ï
.
N
-. I J>
+'
I-:9f
"
1-
+ep
OJ
~
.::-f
62'
~
r
--. .
· FE
wi
Ti
rotO 01
. I ;f ~
! - -'1~'
to ..--i
Þ I o.~
- · ï
ï
,
,,~
{+
l~-
:J
,.,
ï
P
W
+J>
. rJl
~ ;01
a-+
<?J?
IJ>
...., .
-+-
,~')r~
.+.~
ú'_
.
,..
1- I
g .
_1.:+
tJj
~ J-:õf
/>
(/
, z
;' ~
g~ -: .!1P
0" I;; ..~
,,01 - c
,+~ g ~
"J'- ø
,,,,:g 5 ~
;/ ~ø:J ,.
~~: ~
" .,;' ~ '" ~ ~
~~ a. -;
~,. ,.
~,.6 ã:
Q." ~ tÃ
!l'ø ø
...'" a.
~ a. ;:
.,. fÕ
g ¡ i
,
~ .. --!'
..--
.._----~----
'
"
·4
RICHFIELD PARK SPORTS FACILITY
LIGHT LEVEL ANALYSIS - SUMMARY
--
FACILITY ACTUAL AVERAGE MINIMUM COMMENTS
LIGHT LEVEL READINGS STANDARD LEVELS*
(FOOTCANDLES) (FOOTCANDLES)
Infield Outfield Infield outfield .-
Field #1 12 4 30 20 Approximately 70%
(Bronco) Below Standard
200' Outfield
Field #2 14 5 30 20 Approximately 64%
(Pony/Colt) Below Standard
300' outfield
Field #3 18 12 30 20 Approximately 40%
(Shetland) Below Standard
150' - 185'
Outfield
ield #4 17 12 30 20 Approximately 42~
,Mustang) Below Standard
180' Outfield
Tennis Courts 4 30 Approximately 87~
Below Standard
The average existing lighting at Richfield Park is currently only 60% below thr
minimum recommended standard for proposed levels of play.
Liqht Level
Readings were not available for football fields. T-Ball fields and basketball
courts are currently not lighted.
*standard levels as recommended by the Illumination Engineering standards
Handbook.
.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
e Department:
Subject:
Public Works
Council Meeting Date: 7 ¡B191
Public Hearing on Levying a Schedule
of Charges for the Drainage Utili ty Syctcm Agenda Number: PW 91-18
Ordinance No. 1741
Legal notice by advertisement in a local paper on May 23rd, May 30th and
June 6th has been accomplished in accordance with State law.
The charges shown in the three copies of the subject ordinance are based
on a $2.00, $2.50, and $3.00 charge per Equivalent Residential Unit
(ERU) respectively. This translates into an R1 zoned platted lot with a
home being charged $2.28 per month for a $2.00/ERU, $2.85 per month for
a $2.50/ERU, and $3.42 per month for a $3.00/ERU and an R2 zoned platted
lot with a home being charged $1.72 per month for a $2.00/ERU, $2.15 per
month for a $2.50/ERU, and $2.58 per month for a $3.00/ERU. The
remaining schedule of proposed charges are shown on page 2 of the
subject ordinances.
A summary of the drainage utility fees currently being charged by some
local cities is shown below:
City
Charge
Bedford
Keller
Euless
$2.50 per ERU
$2.00 per ERU
$1.50 per ERU
A Public Hearing was opened on June 24th and recessed. The Mayor should
reconvene the Public Hearing, receive further input from citizens and
then close the Public Hearing. The Council can then consider Ordinance
No. 1741 levying drainage utility fees.
Recommendation:
It is recommended the City Council conduct the Public Hearing and take
action on Ordinance No. 1741. Council should designate prior to any
vote on this item which rate, $200/ERU, $2.50/ERU, or $3.00/ERU they are
considering.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
_ Othe
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/ A
Sufficient Funds Available
~ e~'
nt Head Signature I ~,~~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Ftnance Director
Page 1 of
$2.00/ERU
ORDINANCE NO. 1741
_
AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A SCHEDULE OF DRAINAGE CHARGES FOR THE
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE UTILITY SYSTEM
AGAINST ALL REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO SUCH CHARGES UNDER SECTIONS
402.041, ET. SEQ., SUBCHAPTER C OF CHAPTER 402 OF THE TEXAS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas to protect the health and safety from loss of life and property
caused by surface water overflows and surface water stagnation, has
heretofore, pursuant to legislative authority established a Municipal
Drainage Utility System within the municipal boundaries of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, and desires, also pursuant to legislative
authority, to provide rules for the use and operation of such system
and prescribe and establish fees, together with the assessment, levy
and collection thereof, to finance and fund such Municipal Drainage
Utility System; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas finds that the basis for the drainage charges set forth herein
is directly related to drainage; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, finds that the classification of benefitted properties set
forth herein is nondiscriminatory, equitable and reasonable; and
_
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, in setting the schedule of charges for drainage services set
forth hereinbelow, has based its calculations upon an inventory of the
lots and tracts within the municipal boundaries of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas; and
WHEREAS, in setting such schedule of charges for drainage
service, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas,
has considered the uses made of the benefitted properties, using
official zoning maps of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for
that purpose, and has also considered the size and topography of the
parcels of benefitted property in assessing the drainage charges set
forth hereinbelow; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, finds that the schedule of charges set forth hereinbelow, and
the rates upon which such schedule of charges was calculated, are
equitable for similar services in all areas of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas; and
_
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, has held a public hearing on the charges levied and imposed
herein, after publishing notice of such public hearing, all in the
manner prescribed by Subchapter C of Chapter 402 of the Texas Local
Government Code, as amended by Senate Bill No. 1409 during the 72nd
Legislative session.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS;
Ordinance No. 1741
_ Page 2
I .
The following schedule of drainage charges is hereby levied
against all real property lying within the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, subject to drainage charges under Subchapter C of
Chapter 402 of the Texas Local Government Code:
A. Basic Drainaae Charae. The rates set forth herein are
calculated on basis of a drainage charge of $2.00 per ERU
(Equivalent Residential Unit) which is equal to $12.84 per
impervious acre of land. Runoff coefficients and
corresponding rates per acre for various land uses may be
modified by the City Council from time to time by a
modification of said Basic Drainage Charge.
B. Sinale-Familv Residential (R1, R2, R3, R-4-SD, R-5-D, R-6-T
L
R-8). The City Council finds that the single-family
residential lots within the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas will be charged at a rate per platted lot based on
their zoning when a building exists on the platted lot. The
charge per lot is based on the Basic Drainage Charge.
_ Zoning Runoff Coefficient Rate per Lot
R1 0.51 $2.28
R2 0.54 $1.72
R3 0.55 $1.48
R-4-SD 0.59 $0.76
R-5-D 0.59 $0.76
R-6-T 0.63 $0.64
R-8 0.62 $0.96
C. All unplatted tracts, platted lots with other than
residential zoning, or parcels of land which have solely a
residential use are to be charged a drainage fee the same as
a platted lot zoned R1 with a house on it. The rate per Rl
use shall apply for each residential house which exists on
the tract or parcel of land. If in the opinion of the City
the tract or parcel contains an above average amount of
impervious cover, an analysis of the tract can be conducted
to determine the accurate runoff coefficient for the
property. The rate for each such case will be adjusted in
accordance with the analysis.
D.
All other lots, tracts and parcels of land within the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, shall be charged on the
basis of the acreage contained in said lot, tract or parcel
of land, and the use made of such property, in accordance
with the following schedule of drainage charges which are
hereby levied against all such remaining lots, tracts and
parcels of land within City of North Richland Hills, Texas.
_
e
Ordinance No. 1741
Page 3
Land Use
Runoff Coefficient
Rate per Acre
School, Church, &
Institutional
Multifamily
Offices
Commercial
Industrial
0.62
0.66
0.78
0.80
0.81
$ 7.96
$ 8.47
$10.02
$10.27
$10.40
Properties exempted from paying a drainage charge as
described in this ordinance are the following.
1.
Property with proper construction and maintenance of a
wholly sufficient and privately owned drainage system.
Property held and maintained in its natural state,
until such time that the property is developed and all
of the public infrastructure constructed has been
accepted by the City.
Subdivided lots, until a structure has been built on
the lot and a certificate of occupancy has been issued
by the City.
Property owned by the City of North Richland Hills.
2 .
3 .
4.
e
II.
The City Council of City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may
change, adjust, and readjust the rates and charges established herein
for drainage services from time to time by ordinance.
III.
By the passage of Ordinance No. 1727 and the passage of this
Ordinance the City makes no representation that all of the City
drainage problems will be immediately solved and the City Council is
given full discretion in establishing time and quantitative priorities
in expending funds as they become available to meet the drainage needs
of the City on a reasonable basis. Nor shall the passage of Ordinance
No. 1727 and this Ordinance be construed to relieve private land
owners,
developers and others from providing drainage improvements pursuant to
the Subdivision Rules and Regulations of the City as well as any other
ordinance of the City and the laws of this State which relate to
drainage or drainage improvements.
IV.
The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may,
by subsequent ordinance, adopt rules for the operation and conduct of
tþ the North Richland Hills Municipal Drainage Utility System, including
exemptions, if any, from the drainage charges levied therein,
consistent with its authority and State law.
e
Ordinance No. 1741
Page 4
v.
Severability Clause. That is hereby declared to be the intention
of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses
and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be
declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since
the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage; provided, however, that the Municipal
Drainage Utility System charges levied hereby shall take effect on
October I, 1991.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of
, 1991.
APPROVED:
e
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for City
e
$2.50/ERU
ORDINANCE NO. 1741
e
AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A SCHEDULE OF DRAINAGE CHARGES FOR THE
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE UTILITY SYSTEM
AGAINST ALL REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO SUCH CHARGES UNDER SECTIONS
402.041, ET. SEQ., SUBCHAPTER C OF CHAPTER 402 OF THE TEXAS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas to protect the health and safety from loss of life and property
caused by surface water overflows and surface water stagnation, has
heretofore, pursuant to legislative authority established a Municipal
Drainage Utility System within the municipal boundaries of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, and desires, also pursuant to legislative
authority, to provide rules for the use and operation of such system
and prescribe and establish fees, together with the assessment, levy
and collection thereof, to finance and fund such Municipal Drainage
Utility System; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas finds that the basis for the drainage charges set forth herein
is directly related to drainage; and
e
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, finds that the classification of benefitted properties set
forth herein is nondiscriminatory, equitable and reasonable; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, in setting the schedule of charges for drainage services set
forth hereinbelow, has based its calculations upon an inventory of the
lots and tracts within the municipal boundaries of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas; and
WHEREAS, in setting such schedule of charges for drainage
service, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas,
has considered the uses made of the benefitted properties, using
official zoning maps of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for
that purpose, and has also considered the size and topography of the
parcels of benefitted property in assessing the drainage charges set
forth hereinbelow; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, finds that the schedule of charges set forth hereinbelow, and
the rates upon which such schedule of charges was calculated, are
equitable for similar services in all areas of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas; and
e
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, has held a public hearing on the charges levied and imposed
herein, after publishing notice of such public hearing, all in the
manner prescribed by Subchapter C of Chapter 402 of the Texas Local
Government Code, as amended by Senate Bill No. 1409 during the 72nd
Legislative session.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS;
e
Ordinance No. 1741
Page 2
I .
The following schedule of drainage charges is hereby levied
against all real property lying within the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, subject to drainage charges under Subchapter C of
Chapter 402 of the Texas Local Government Code:
A. Basic Drainaae Charge. The rates set forth herein are
calculated on basis of a drainage charge of $2.50 per ERU
(Equivalent Residential Unit) which is equal to $16.05 per
impervious acre of land. Runoff coefficients and
corresponding rates per acre for various land uses may be
modified by the City Council from time to time by a
modification of said Basic Drainage Charge.
B. Sinale-Familv Residential lR1, R2, R3, R-4-SD, R-5-D, R-6-T
& R-8). The City Council finds that the single-family
residential lots within the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas will be charged at a rate per platted lot based on
their zoning when a building exists on the platted lot. The
charge per lot is based on the Basic Drainage Charge.
e Zoning Runoff Coefficient Rate oer Lot
R1 0.51 $2.85
R2 0.54 $2.15
R3 0.55 $1.85
R-4-SD 0.59 $0.95
R-5-D 0.59 $0.95
R-6-T 0.63 $0.80
R-8 0.62 $1.20
C. All unplatted tracts, platted lots with other than
residential zoning, or parcels of land which have solely a
residential use are to be charged a drainage fee the same as
a platted lot zoned Rl with a house on it. The rate per Rl
use shall apply for each residential house which exists on
the tract or parcel of land. If in the opinion of the City
the tract or parcel contains an above average amount of
impervious cover, an analysis of the tract can be conducted
to determine the accurate runoff coefficient for the
property. The rate for each such case will be adjusted in
accordance with the analysis.
D.
All other lots, tracts and parcels of land within the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, shall be charged on the
basis of the acreage contained in said lot, tract or parcel
of land, and the use made of such property, in accordance
with the following schedule of drainage charges which are
hereby levied against all such remaining lots, tracts and
parcels of land within City of North Richland Hills, Texas.
e
Ordinance No. 1741
e Page 3
Land Use
Runoff Coefficient
Rate cer Acre
School, Church, &
Institutional
Multifamily
Offices
Commercial
Industrial
0.62
0.66
0.78
0.80
0.81
$ 9.95
$10.59
$12.53
$12.84
$13.00
Properties exempted from paying a drainage charge as
described in this ordinance are the following.
1.
Property with proper construction and maintenance of a
wholly sufficient and privately owned drainage system.
Property held and maintained in its natural state,
until such time that the property is developed and all
of the public infrastructure constructed has been
accepted by the City.
Subdivided lots, until a structure has been built on
the lot and a certificate of occupancy has been issued
by the City.
Property owned by the City of North Richland Hills.
2.
3 .
4.
e
II.
The City Council of City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may
change, adjust, and readjust the rates and charges established herein
for drainage services from time to time by ordinance.
III.
By the passage of Ordinance No. 1727 and the passage of this
Ordinance the City makes no representation that all of the City
drainage problems will be immediately solved and the City Council is
given full discretion in establishing time and quantitative priorities
in expending funds as they become available to meet the drainage needs
of the City on a reasonable basis. Nor shall the passage of Ordinance
No. 1727 and this Ordinance be construed to relieve private land
owners,
developers and others from providing drainage improvements pursuant to
the Subdivision Rules and Regulations of the City as well as any other
ordinance of the City and the laws of this State which relate to
drainage or drainage improvements.
IV.
The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may,
by subsequent ordinance, adopt rules for the operation and conduct of
the North Richland Hills Municipal Drainage Utility System, including
tþexemptions, if any, from the drainage charges levied therein,
consistent with its authority and State law.
e
Ordinance No. 1741
Page 4
V.
Severability Clause. That is hereby declared to be the intention
of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses
and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be
declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since
the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage; provided, however, that the Municipal
Drainage Utility System charges levied hereby shall take effect on
October 1, 1991.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of
, 1991.
APPROVED:
e
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for City
e
e
e
e
$3.00/ERU
ORDINANCE NO. 1741
AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A SCHEDULE OF DRAINAGE CHARGES FOR THE
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE UTILITY SYSTEM
AGAINST ALL REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, SUBJECT TO SUCH CHARGES UNDER SECTIONS
402.041, ET. SEQ., SUBCHAPTER C OF CHAPTER 402 OF THE TEXAS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas to protect the health and safety from loss of life and property
caused by surface water overflows and surface water stagnation, has
heretofore, pursuant to legislative authority established a Municipal
Drainage Utility System within the municipal boundaries of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, and desires, also pursuant to legislative
authority, to provide rules for the use and operation of such system
and prescribe and establish fees, together with the assessment, levy
and collection thereof, to finance and fund such Municipal Drainage
Utility System; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas finds that the basis for the drainage charges set forth herein
is directly related to drainage; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, finds that the classification of benefitted properties set
forth herein is nondiscriminatory, equitable and reasonable; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, in setting the schedule of charges for drainage services set
forth hereinbelow, has based its calculations upon an inventory of the
lots and tracts within the municipal boundaries of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas; and
WHEREAS, in setting such schedule of charges for drainage
service, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas,
has considered the uses made of the benefitted properties, using
official zoning maps of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for
that purpose, and has also considered the size and topography of the
parcels of benefitted property in assessing the drainage charges set
forth hereinbelow; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, finds that the schedule of charges set forth hereinbelow, and
the rates upon which such schedule of charges was calculated, are
equitable for similar services in all areas of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, has held a public hearing on the charges levied and imposed
herein, after publishing notice of such public hearing, all in the
manner prescribed by Subchapter C of Chapter 402 of the Texas Local
Government Code, as amended by Senate Bill No. 1409 during the 72nd
Legislative session.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS;
e
Ordinance No. 1741
Page 2
I .
The following schedule of drainage charges is hereby levied
against all real property lying within the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, subject to drainage charges under Subchapter C of
Chapter 402 of the Texas Local Government Code:
A. Basic Drainaae Charge. The rates set forth herein are
calculated on basis of a drainage charge of $3.00 per ERU
(Equivalent Residential Unit) which is equal to $19.26 per
impervious acre of land. Runoff coefficients and
corresponding rates per acre for various land uses may be
modified by the City Council from time to time by a
modification of said Basic Drainage Charge.
B. Sinale-Familv Residential (R1, R2, R3, R-4-SD, R-5-D, R-6-T
.L
R-8). The City Council finds that the single-family
residential lots within the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas will be charged at a rate per platted lot based on
their zoning when a building exists on the platted lot. The
charge per lot is based on the Basic Drainage Charge.
e Zoning Runoff Coefficient Rate oer Lot
R1 0.51 $3.42
R2 0.54 $2.58
R3 0.55 $2.22
R-4-SD 0.59 $1.14
R-5-D 0.59 $1.14
R-6-T 0.63 $0.96
R-8 0.62 $1.44
C. All unplatted tracts, platted lots with other than
residential zoning, or parcels of land which have solely a
residential use are to be charged a drainage fee the same as
a platted lot zoned R1 with a house on it. The rate per R1
use shall apply for each residential house which exists on
the tract or parcel of land. If in the opinion of the City
the tract or parcel contains an above average amount of
impervious cover, an analysis of the tract can be conducted
to determine the accurate runoff coefficient for the
property. The rate for each such case will be adjusted in
accordance with the analysis.
D.
All other lots, tracts and parcels of land within the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, shall be charged on the
basis of the acreage contained in said lot, tract or parcel
of land, and the use made of such property, in accordance
with the following schedule of drainage charges which are
hereby levied against all such remaining lots, tracts and
parcels of land within City of North Richland Hills, Texas.
e
e
Ordinance No. 1741
Page 3
Land Use
Runoff Coefficient
Rate Der Acre
School, Church, &
Institutional
Multifamily
Offices
Commercial
Industrial
0.62
0.66
0.78
0.80
0.81
$11.94
$12.71
$15.03
$15.41
$15.60
Properties exempted from paying a drainage charge as
described in this ordinance are the following.
1.
Property with proper construction and maintenance of a
wholly sufficient and privately owned drainage system.
Property held and maintained in its natural state,
until such time that the property is developed and all
of the public infrastructure constructed has been
accepted by the City.
Subdivided lots, until a structure has been built on
the lot and a certificate of occupancy has been issued
by the City.
Property owned by the City of North Richland Hills.
2 .
3.
4.
e
II.
The City Council of City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may
change, adjust, and readjust the rates and charges established herein
for drainage services from time to time by ordinance.
III.
By the passage of Ordinance No. 1727 and the passage of this
Ordinance the City makes no representation that all of the City
drainage problems will be immediately solved and the City Council is
given full discretion in establishing time and quantitative priorities
in expending funds as they become available to meet the drainage needs
of the City on a reasonable basis. Nor shall the passage of Ordinance
No. 1727 and this Ordinance be construed to relieve private land
owners,
developers and others from providing drainage improvements pursuant to
the Subdivision Rules and Regulations of the City as well as any other
ordinance of the City and the laws of this State which relate to
drainage or drainage improvements.
IV.
e
The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, may,
by subsequent ordinance, adopt rules for the operation and conduct of
the North Richland Hills Municipal Drainage Utility System, including
exemptions, if any, from the drainage charges levied therein,
consistent with its authority and State law.
e
e
e
Ordinance No. 1741
Page 4
V.
Severability Clause. That is hereby declared to be the intention
of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses
and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be
declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since
the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage; provided, however, that the Municipal
Drainage Utility System charges levied hereby shall take effect on
October 1, 1991.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of
, 1991.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for City
~ .
e
P RoP05£&:' C.e.'JT~UNe.
w
~o~
L..., "4~
ALL 0 f t hat c e, t ¡; 1 f1 h- ,,': t ,y pcH' 0: ~ I :.. f 1 \n<1 '-; d- '.'3 t ed If' i; he JOHN ':ONDR/\
SURVEY, Absty¿\<:t N.). '1(' 1;, T:J.yy."ni; '.o·..1ntv. Te:>:ðc. and t'€·\fll] ;'1 pOyt10n of
th@ tract des..:rlbed 1n tt"\P d....ed .~0 Re.ber''',; L. He'3ch @tux l~ltJr'ê\ rœcordsd 1n
Vol ume 4795, P.~ae 61 '] Q t t. t".e úef..~d ~~'fJC 0(' de:,. T ~Y"" ~n t ('('lInt .¥', rex as and moye
P . y tic u 1 a r 1 y d as c,. 1 bed b Y I;' e t ~ ~ ..~ r' d b 01 \I'" r1 ~ .-'\ <;:; t ..~. 1 1 ':J"-' S :
'J
~b
II...
~~
~
~ .
~N
5~
"2~
"2Q..
1i-
~~
8~
ûi:>
~
õ
Ò
o
2
Õ' TEMPO~ÞRY ESMT.
A -:.oo·Zg'o"
r?-= I \ Î 8. ï l
L- ~ 9 . ~8
Begtnninq at ~. 1/2" ,:apped steel rod ~I; ~mped (T\o...k sur v. 1r.,=.' 1n the W@st
boundar y 11 ne (') f sa id HF}sC h t,.. ac t f y .:>m -..h 1 C h t; he Nor t hwe!'>t ': c·y ner () t sa 1 d
tYð.:t bears North 00 degy&t.::::: 01 OtlnLtte5 33 C;~QrHj5 Ec-\st ~:(). 45 feet:
~o S~ RT' L... HESCH Ej'\J')C GL..oftlA
VOL- . q.'9'!Þ, p(7. <.øl3. p2"T~\
E:x I
ì/~
JOHN CONDRA SURV~Y, A-3\O
PAPCEl ~ ~
~ t:-: SC ¡:;. ! ¡'-' f ~ ~N
Thence 1n an Easteyly dire,~t ":.·n with tn~~ '"-:"....l~l 'no
of Bursey Poad fa vaY'lable width '( lqht of WdX·' thp
':Attt. : :¡ht- .~. \.,.I,-··,v
f -:' l 1,:.'; 1 n (~ ," ~ 1 1 '~ :
1 t pp
e
South
steel
S':Ju t h
steel
~3·..Ju t h
st ,,~el
Selu t: h
sta-o?l
Hese:t't
88 deClreecs
rod stamped
81 degr '::f'?S
rod ,;tamped
7'3 r1eQ1'" ~es
J" ,")d stamp €?d
b3 deÇJr~e4E.
t" ~,d ~ t L~ fiiP ~d
t(::1ct:
02 mlnut.~=,,~
c Inr.:I¿t~: ~ u t' ..' .
1(, "'llìutes
( mc. a t< C;Lt r '../ ·
1 5 mi nu'. e:3
c.. moa.~ c.::UY v ·
--:5 mlnut~C::i
1m.:) a k :-: u r '.. .
t 5 $f?C on d ~ E a ~ t t -1 . ;. G , ee r t ,'.
inc. );
04 sec('.nr1~1 E.a$t .~':~. I"j fE-at · '-,
i "'t: . \ ;
4(t 5~C onds E ,.lS t ~ 3. ~'. J f .~fl·
ln~. .;
56 seconds Eclst ~:..).6-1. t~et trl
1 n.-:: .) \ n t h& E~~t tJI .'-,.....d~... '. I. ~ n~
,~ t,' II ¡~Jpp~d
ð 1,.. _." ~uped
1 ... .- ·.~po~~
.. 1 I ~ I' .: r\ppec1
'-:If ~all_1
Th ..?n.: I ~ ~~ '.='u t. , . -.\ I rj eçH" p~r:-. pA ITIl nu t es () 4 -= f?r~ ,-)n.1 ~~ I" I(~,,=, + ".- : .. h P S':-i 1 :::~ é:.' :. t
bÜU¡ì("~,:\.- / ; .,-,(;' i'3..-::0 rt::,~t ....-.
-. It r:, p r ,;a~'1 - ·t· -. '. I ~",,,,
r 1. Q h t: Ü f " J ,.. Y ~! P e '::-. f
In,· . ~ iP ',,~ìe l.,r '''p..:,~::n(J ~out"leY 1 y
e:urVf? ~- the l~ft:
~r,cp.j (f'P"-'é'~'
· ~ (r' ,..- e v r.- ':' :\ d
. t y ',.' ,
.4' ',0 "
Thence with ~dlrt pr't.."po4J1ed yo loht ,:Jf '''''e-,y 1 in@ anr.t t:HYVe tl:-"~ the left ....,t)'/lng a
radiu~ .-:.f 1 ~ 78. 71 f~et, a .-:pnt.roal '''I,~lQ t:,tf I) d@'Jr"ee£ ':9 tnlr\Utp«! 07 . eaf':·')f'"td5.
an .~r r ~! l-:.,t ,-,n~ e .",. ,,~. ";lC t' ~~t ,..,H1d 1 CtnQ < rl)Y' f1 ,', f ~~.-,( '.' h ""J deqt- PÇH'; .j'~
mlnutes ~t?,,:,.>nd~ ~oest ,",'0"' ,:,:\ l/~:" :-_~ppr~<1 ·,~t~~.~i ('-.'(1 .1.\mpe(J 'ff'('~~" :='V.f"V.
i n I: . ~ :
Thence ì',¡c,,..trl 74 dagyees l";~ "'lnut~s 58 second';; ~'~st (·':'r.t lr.Ulnq Wi th ~~ld
p'" op.:¡sed r 1 gh1" '-' f way I i np- 58. 78 f £?E!t t C' '" \.':'" ': "DPF" I. +: PO'> 1 ~ r,d ., t ,,<n·per!
(m.~~¥ surv. tnf.:.) ~t th~ b.-'_"-:11nnlnq of .~ curvp to tne ~f~ft ~
Thent:e cent lnL\lna with ';ald pyoposed Y lqht of I.,<I¿\V 11n~"' ;~nd ~UYV~ t·_, tr.e
left having 3 ,..adIUs. of 740.00 teet, a cent,...,1 angle c·f 7 dtt9YP.t~5 21
minutes 58 ~econd$, an ~rc dlst.nce of 95.14 feet and a long chord of North
77 degree5 54 A'I1nutp!> '=ï1 seconds We"St 95.07 feet to a \ /2" '~õlpp@d ste....1 yod
st',~mped ''nodk ~t..tYV. inc. ,t In tt,C' WH~~ houndar'v llne .:-1 ~.;\d He~,:h tr ~.c::t:
ThencE.' t'!(".Y'+;~ dO ,1en~e~~
1 ~ n ~ .~ () . ':'; ~:; f ~~e t t..J t t-. fi
\ 3nlj . m.)Y (;' or J e~s.
01 m 1 nutec; 31 ~C?.-: ond~ £c3 5t wit h ~:·d i d wøçt t~·)und ;:n- v
p 1 dC e ú f beg 1 nn 1 nq '::;.f)(j '. c·n t ë\ 1 rl1 nr;¡ <'. IJ ¡8'1 '-"'t:.., ,~s :) f
e
\ ~ ;-"("
.. ~' -L~ . \ Y-,_--.;,q
'--- G
DAVID C. MOAK
SURVEYORS, INC.
REGISTERED PUBLIC SURV EYOR
PO. BOX 1034 268- 2211
HUR S T t TEXAS
DATE - zz. - ~ \ NO'B~_ ~~- 1\
TYPE 3