The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 2005-08-22 Agendas . · · · . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 22, 2005 - 5:30 P.M. For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall - Pre-Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820. I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION I TAKEN 1. Discuss Items from August 22, 2005 City Council Meeting (5 Minutes) Review Grant for Traffic Signal Timing Plans for Rufe Snow 2. IR 2005-109 Drive and Holiday Lane (5 Minutes) 3. IR 2005-110 Presentation by Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited Regarding the Proposed Reconstruction of Greens at Iron Horse Golf Course (15 Minutes) 4. IR 2005-102 Demonstration of the Parks Security Cameras Located at Green Valley, Cross Timbers, Walkers Creek and Richfield Parks (10 Minutes) 15. I Adjournment I I ~~sr~ . .........~~.":1'~ ,'. Date \ () .. 0 () ~~ W) · Time ~t. City SecretðrY By ~ W ~·~S~ 08/22/05 City Council Agenda Page 1 of 4 . . . . .. . . CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 22, 2005 - 7:00 PM For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 817-427-6060 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation - Councilwoman Compton 3. Pledge - Councilwoman Compton 4. Special Presentations Yard of the Month 5. Citizens Presentation 6. Removal of Item( s) from the Consent Agenda 08/22/05 City Council Agenda Page 2 of 4 t' . . . t NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. Consent a. Minutes of the July 29-30, 2005 Council Agenda Budget Work Session b. Minutes of the August 08, 2005 Council Meeting GN 2005-081 c. Approve Contract Authorizing Pass- Through State Grant Agreement for NETS - Resolution No. 2005-058 PU 2005-034 d. Authorize Interlocal Purchasing Agreement with the City of Keller - Resolution No. 2005-059 PAY 2005-005 e. Approve Final Payment to McClendon Construction Company in the Amount of $19,999.44 for Douglas Lane (Hightower Drive to 200' north) with Required Storm Drain Improvements 8. GN 2005-082 Conduct Public Hearing on Proposed Tax Rate Approve Roadway Safety Awareness Marker 9. GN 2005-083 Policy - Resolution No. 2005-060 Award of Contract for Professional Auditing 10. PU 2005-035 Services to Patillo, Brown & Hill, L.L.P. - Resolution No. 2005-061 11. PU 2005-036 Authorize Purchase of Public Safety Software from Compudyne Public Safety and Justice, Inc. in the amount of $427,020 - Resolution No. 2005-062 12. PU 2005-037 Authorize Purchase of Computer Equipment for the Public Safety System Upgrade from IBM Corporation in the Amount of $84,566 - Resolution No. 2005-063 13. GN 2005-084 Conduct Public Hearing on Proposed 2005-2006 Budget Consider Appointments to the Youth Advisory 14. GN 2005-085 Committee Consider Appointments to the Economic 15. GN 2005-086 Development Advisory Committee 08/22/05 City Council Agenda Page 3 of 4 .. .. . ",". " .. " ... "'- NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN . 16. Information and Reports - Councilwoman Cox IR 2005-110 Review of Proposed Reconstruction of Greens at Iron Horse IR 2005-113 Review Development Plan of the Dog Park Facility 17. Adjournment . <¿ ~~1~ 5 ! Date \ Ö·. () () ð-, · tv) . Time ~~et~w~ By . 08/22/05 City Council Agenda Page 4 of 4 , \. INFORMAL REPORT TO MA VOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 2005-109 ~ .. Date: V Subject: August 22, 2005 Review Grant for Traffic Signal Timing Plans for Rufe Snow Drive and Holiday Lane The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) has implemented a regional project called the Thoroughfare Assessment Program (TAP). The goal of this program (TAP) is to maximize the capacity of the existing roadway system by improving traffic operations through signal timing and implementation of low-cost operational improvements along selected corridors. NCTCOG is requesting that municipalities that are interested in submitting a corridor for consideration to do so by 5:00 p.m., August 26, 2005. . The City has been making operational improvements to all of its major corridors during the past few years. There are currently two corridors that have not been retimed that may be eligible for this program. They are the Rufe Snow Drive and Holiday Lane corridors. Even though these two locations are identified in the currently approved 2004-2005 Capital Projects Budget (Signal Timing and Equipment Upgrades -2004) and funding is available, staff believes that one or both corridors may be eligible for TAP. If selected the City could substantially reduce the estimated $75,000 currently approved. The only known drawback in participating in this program is a delay in retiming these corridors. Staff is currently ready to recommend award of an agreement to begin the timing of Rufe Snow Drive and Holiday Lane. ,If we participate we will need to wait .approximately two months in order to find out if our locations are selected for the program. If selected, NCTCOG will administer the project and the City will just need to pay a 20% local match. ~ Staff believes this would be an opportunity to reduce the City's cost of this project and is in favor of submitting Rufe Snow Drive and Holiday Lane to NCTCOG for consideration. But since this will cause ,some delay to the project, staff wanted to get consensus from Council as to how to proceed. . Respectfully submitted, ~ ~' . . / . ~ ~~ ike Curtis, .E. Public Works Director ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO MA VOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR# 2005-110 Date: August 22, 2005 Subject: Presentation by Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited (EAGL) Regarding the Proposed Reconstruction of Greens at Iron Horse Golf Course We have asked representatives from Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, the management company under contract to operate Iron Horse Golf Course, to make a presentation on their proposed greens reconstruction project. As you know, this project is currently planned to occur during the summer of 2006 and all costs associated with the project have been factored in the proposed operating budget for FY 2005-2006. Those present will be Mr. Keith Hanley, Vice President of Operations, and Mr. Dale Folmar, Regional Manager, both with EAGL. Mr. Neil Schmidt, General Manager and Head Golf Professional at Iron Horse, will make the presentation spending a few minutes explaining the need for the new greens and then review the proposed process and timing for the reconstruction. At the conclusion of his - presentation, there will be an opportunity for discussion or questions. Mr. Schmidt and others will then return during the regular City Council meeting to again make the brief presentation for the benefit of the general public. e If you have any questions prior to the meeting please feel free to call. Respectfully submitted, ¿. C Richard Torres Assistant City Manager e ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS INF"ORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 2005-102 Date: August 22, 2005 Subject: Demonstration of Park Security Cameras Located at Green Valley, Cross Timbers, Walker's Creek and Richfield Parks At their April 14, 2005 meeting, City Council approved funding for the purchase and installation of security cameras at Cross Timbers Park, Green Valley Park, Richfield Park a·nd Walker's Creek Park. The project called for installation of vandal resistant cameras at various locations within each park to provide adequate video surveillance coverage. Digital storage units have been located within secured building space at each park and will provide up to 90 days of data storage. The cameras will be accessed by staff, via the internet, for monitoring. The installation is now complete. Staff will be providing a brief demonstration, at the Pre- Council meeting, displaying the security cameras capabilities. Respectfully Submitted, IJiri ¡Ä Vickie Loftice Director of Parks and Recreation ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS e e e AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AREA 5 AREA 6 AREA 7 AREA 8 AREA 9 Y ARD-OF- THE-MONTH August,_2005 Tobv & Donna Keeling. 6501 Brilev Robert & Rosalie Bergerson. 4317 Lvnn Terrace Paul & Jodi Miller 6328 Meadowlakes Drive Bob & Inge Gossett. 7132 Meadow Park N. Jeff & Cynthie Garner. 6001 Avalon St. Cindy Tucker. 6924 Meadow Creek Chad & Stacy Enaelhardt. 7004 MOSSYCUD Lane Randv Keislina. 6809 Green Acres Dr. Billie Dozier. 6885 Paintbrush Ct. Texas SmartScape Winner John Dickinson. 6800 Nob Hill Business Landscape Winner Villas on the Green. 8515 GraDevine Hiahwav Amber GaDinski. ProDertv Manaaer .. e MINUTES OF THE BUDGET WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD AT GARRETT CREEK RANCH CONFERENCE CENTER, 270 PRIVATE ROAD 3475, PARADISE, TEXAS - JULY 29-30, 2005 Present: City Council: Oscar Trevino Tim Welch John Lewis Jo Cox Suzy Compton JoAnn Johnson David Whitson Nancy Bielik Mayor Mayor Pro T em Council member Council member Council member Council member Council member Council member e Staff: Larry J. Cunningham Richard Torres Ogden Bo Bass Karen Bostic Richard Abernethy Patricia Hutson Larry Koonce Drew Corn Mary Edwards Margaret Ragus Ann Fuller City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Managing Director Admin/Fiscal Services Assistant to City Manager City Secretary Director of Finance Director of Budget Public Information Officer Budget Analyst Internal Auditor / Fin. Analyst CALL TO ORDER Mayor Trevino called the Council Budget Work Session to order July 29, 2005 at 9:06 a.m. with all council members present. Mayor Trevino announced that the Crime Control and Prevention District Board would meet in conjunction with the City Council Budget Work Session. Mayor Trevino made opening remarks. The City Manager presented a PowerPoint presentation. Mr. Cunningham highlighted accomplishments achieved by the departments over the past year, gave the economic outlook and advised of assumptions used to prepare the proposed budget. Mr. Cunningham reviewed highlights of the proposed budget. The proposed budget includes no reductions in services or service levels, no employee lay-offs or reductions, a collection rate of 99% of property taxes, maintains the property tax rate of 57¢, a forecast of 60/0 decrease in sales taxes, only mandated and highly crucial service/program enhancements are recommended, and an e increase in water and sewer rates as recommended by the Utility Rate Study recently presented to Council. Proposed are the implementation of the following changes and cost savings measures: reprioritization of non-emergency equipment replacements, reprioritization Council Budget Work Session Minutes July 29-30, 2005 Page 2 of 7 e of building capital equipment and maintenance projects, reprioritization of technology replacements and upgrades, funding a portion of the Preventive Street Maintenance Program with project savings and interest earnings and reducing the contribution to the Pay-As-You-Go Capital Reserves. It is not believed that the recommended cost savings will adversely impact overall services during the next fiscal year and the intent is to resume the projects when the local economy improves. Service enhancements being recommended are 1) the replacement of the postage machine (a mandated cost and part of the 2004/2005 revised budget); 2) implementing the 2003 International Building Code (a mandated cost); 3) professional services for phases 2 and 3 of the Property Protection Classification Rating Analysis; 4) the addition of a school crossing guard at the New Walker Creek Elementary School; and 5) a walk-in freezer expansion at the Animal Shelter. No changes to the City's health insurance program are planned in the next fiscal year but an increase in employee premiums to address rising healthcare costs and to help rebuild Reserve Funds is anticipated. Council was advised that the use of the reserves was justifiable and prudent, but that the reserves needed to be restored as soon as practicable. Mr. Corn presented a PowerPoint presentation explaining the General Fund and the departments and reyenue categories included in the General Fund. A brief overview was given of the revised .2004/05 budget, revenues and expenditures. Mr. Corn presented the proposed 2005/06 general fund revenues and expenditures, history of net taxable values, and 2005 appraised values. Mr. Corn discussed changes to the general fund revenue. e Mr. Corn discussed in detail the 2005/06 general fund service enhancements totaling $29,958. Changes discussed were: · Walk-in Freezer Expansion · Professional Services for ISO Rating · School Crossing Guard - New School · Mandated Cost - 2003 Building Code Mayor Trevino recessed the work session at 10:20 a.m. and called the work session back to order at 10:34 a.m. Mr. Cunningham advised Council that the City received updated appraisal values on July 25. The information provided in Council's budget packets was an estimate based on the May 2005 appraised values. The July 25 appraised values are higher than the May forecast resulting in additional dollars from the increase in net taxable value. Council was provided with updated Schedules 1-4 showing the additional dollars based on the increase in value. Mr. Cunningham suggested the additional dollars be used for the restoration of the general fund balance as reflected on updated Schedules 1-4. Council consensus was to use the additional dollars for the restoration of the general fund reserves as presented. The City Council began a review of the schedules of the General Fund Revenues and Expenditures Summaries with Staff responding to questions. e Council questioned if Birdville Independent School District would reimburse the City for School Resource Officers as it had last year. Mr. Torres advised that he had heard that Council Budget Work Session Minutes July 29-30, 2005 Page 3 of 7 e the School Board had approved an agreement similar to last year's but that the City had not yet seen the agreement. Councilman Whitson expressed concern that the funding of employee tuition reimbursement had been cut. Council agreed to fund tuition reimbursement for all employees by moving funds from City Council Special Projects to the Human Resources budget. Council discussed the replacement of the postage machine due to the Postal Service mandating the retirement of meters using letterpress technology by January 1 , 2006. Council concurred with funding the replacement of the postage machine in the revised 2004/05 budget. Councilwoman Bielik questioned the turnover rate for full-time employees. Mr. Cunningham advised the City's overall turnover rate was below the national average. e Councilwoman Bielik asked how the City's uncollected ambulance debt compares to other cities. Mr. Koonce advised that a comparison with other cities had been conducted and that North Richland Hills collection rate is in line with other cities that also outsource. Staff discussed with Council ambulance billings and collections. Mr. Koonce explained how the ambulance bad debts are budgeted and how they are written off. Mr. Cunningham pointed out that with the new State law, the City is able to assess a fee to fund the Teen Court case manager's salary. Council inquired as to the number of teen court violations filed. Council asked that an update be provided at a Pre-Council meeting. Council discussed the replacement of the walk-in freezer at the Animal Shelter and concurred with replacing it with a larger unit. Mayor Pro Tem Welch questioned why the Dan Echols Senior Center did not show donations received in their Performance Measures while the Bursey Road Senior Center showed donations received in their performance measures outputs. Staff will find out if the Dan Echols Center also received donations. Mayor Trevino recessed the work session at 12:05 p.m. and called the work session back to order at 1 :05 p.m. Council resumed their review of the schedules of the General Fund Revenues and Expenditures Summaries with Staff responding to questions. e Mr. Cunningham explained the accounting of non-departmental expenditures. The Mayor asked Council if they had any concerns with the accounting of non-departmental expenditures. The Council expressed no concerns and concurred that they understood the accounting method for non-departmental expenditures. Council Budget Work Session Minutes July 29-30, 2005 Page 4 of 7 e Councilwoman Bielik advised some of the surrounding cities did not issue Certificates of Occupancy to rental property until all debts are paid to the city and asked if North Richland Hills had considered doing the same until unpaid utility bills are paid. Councilman Lewis thought that Haltom City was addressing unpaid utility bills through an ordinance. Staff will research Haltom City's ordinance and determine its applicability to North Richland Hills. Mr. Koonce discussed with the Council the General Debt Service Fund Summary of Revenues and Expenditures. Councilwoman Bielik advised that she had learned from the Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) that businesses are not paying property taxes on signs and questioned how much income the City is losing. Staff advised that TAD should be including the signs on the tax rolls. Staff will contact TAD regarding the issue. Council concurred with the General Fund budget as presented and with maintaining the current tax rate of 57¢ per $100 valuation Mr. Corn presented an overview of the Special Revenue funds and discussed the day-to-day operations of the Park and Recreation Fund. Council gave their consensus on the funds. Mr. Koonce presented a PowerPoint presentation of the Crime Control District summarizing e the revenues and expenditures, programs, accomplishments and history of the District since its inception. The proposed 2005/06 Crime Control District Budget was presented. The budget includes proposed expenditures of $4.7 million to include CCD personnel costs, indirect costs to the General Fund, General Fund police compensation plan enhancements, supplies/maintenance/capital, and transfer to the Vehicle Replacement Fund. The budget includes replacement of five patrol cars, one pickup truck for property evidence and eight mobile video systems. All goals and objectives as set out in the original CCD proposal and renewal referendum have been met and are being maintained. Following the PowerPoint presentation, Mayor Trevino announced at 2:00 p.m. that he was calling the Crime Control and Prevention District Budget Work Session to order and the District began discussion of the proposed budget and reviewed the Fund Summary. Mayor Trevino called the Budget Work Session back to order at 2:08 p.m. Council reviewed and discussed the Promotional Fund and Donations Fund. Council was in consensus on the recommended service changes and the funds presented. Mayor Trevino recessed the work session at 2:15 p.m. and called the work session back to order at 2:30 p.m. Council discussed the Special Investigation Fund and Drainage Utility Fund. Council concurred on the funds and recommended service changes. e Council Budget Work Session Minutes July 29-30, 2005 Page 5 of 7 e Mr. Corn presented an overview of the Internal Service Funds and Council discussed the Building Services Fund, Equipment Services Fund, Insurance Fund and Information Services Fund. Council concurred with the funds presented and recommended service chang'es. Mr. Corn presented an overview of the Enterprise Funds consisting of the Utility Fund, Golf Fund and Aquatic Park Fund. Council discussed the water and sewer proposed rate increas'es. Councilwoman Bielik asked about putting on Citicable and the City's website before the new water and sewer rates are adopted, information on the rate increases and explaining the need for the increases. Mayor Trevino recessed the work session at 3:05 p.m. and called the work session back to order at 3:25 p.m. Council resumed discussion of the Enterprise Funds and discussed the Golf Course Fund and Aquatic Park Fund. e Council discussed the marketing of the golf course restaurant and suggested that the restaurant be promoted and advertised through Citicable, Utility Billing inserts, City website, etc. Councilwoman Compton suggested that goals and objectives be created for the golf course and EAGL be held accountable. Council concurred with the replacement of the golf course greens. Council concurred with the Golf Course Fund Summary and funding appropriation of the greens reconstruction project presented by Staff. Staff presented and discussed with Council the revised 2004/05 Aquatic Park revenues and expenses and the proposed 2005/06 Aquatic Park revenues and expenses. Council concurred with the Aquatic Park budget. Mr. Koonce advised the Council's auto reimbursement policy provides that the Finance Director is to present annually to Council the activity for the year. Mr. Koonce advised he had verified all reimbursement forms for the year from July 2004 through June 2005 and reported that everything was in order. The City Council had been provided with a list of reimbursements and was advised that verification is on'file. Mayor Trevino asked if Council had any questions concerning the items that had been discussed in the Operating Budget and reconfirmed that Council was in agreement with the operating budget, the 57 cent per $100 tax rate, and all funds discussed with only one change e - funding tuition reimbursement in all departments from the City Council's budget. All Council Members concurred. Council Budget Work Session Minutes July 29-30, 2005 Page 6 of 7 e Mayor Trevino recessed the work session at 4:20 p.m. and called the work session back to order at 7:00 p.m. Mr. Bass presented a PowerPoint Presentation of the 2005/06 Capital Improvements Program for the Public Works Department. Mr. Bass reviewed the projects completed in fiscal year 2004/05 and gave an update on each of the continuing projects. Mr. Bass discussed new street and sidewalk projects, the continuing drainage projects, continuing utility projects and new utility projects. Councilman Lewis brought to Staff's attention the need for sidewalks for the new school in the Keller ISD - the residents in Thornbridge are seeking sidewalks on North Tarrant and Precinct Line. Sidewalks may also be needed for the Northridge Middle and Elementary schools around Starnes, Douglas and Hightower. Councilman Whitson referred to the signalization project on Mid Cities Boulevard at Parker Boulevard and asked if consideration had been given to renaming the streets Parker Boulevard and Martin Drive with the same street name. Staff will take the suggestion under advisement. e Council reached a consensus on the 2005/06 Capital Improvements Program for the Public Works Department. Mayor Pro Tem Welch referred to the Big Fossil Creek Wastewater Outfall project and questioned if it would take the City to ultimate capacity. Staff advised that they would find out and report back. Mayor Trevino recessed the work session at 7:43 p.m. and called the work session back to order on July 30,2005 at 8:01 a.m. with all Council members and staff present as recorded. Mr. Torres presented a PowerPoint presentation highlighting the 2005/06 Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Fund. Mr. Torres recapped the proposed revenues and expenditures for 2005/06. Mr. Torres reviewed the completed 2004/05 park projects, continuing projects for 2005/06 and highlighted the new park projects. Councilwoman Johnson expressed concerns with the number of parks on the south side of Loop 820. Councilwoman Johnson felt there had not been enough parks built on the south side of Loop 820. It was suggested that when the parking expansion project was completed at City Hall, land not used for parking could be utilized as a park. e Council discussed the replacement of the greens at the Golf Course and asked for a report at the second Council meeting in August at the Pre-Council meeting and an informational report at the regular council meeting from the Golf Course Management Team on the options looked at for the greens reconstruction and why the option chosen is the best option. Council Budget Work Session Minutes July 29-30, 2005 Page 7 of 7 e Council concurred with the Parks Capital Improvement Program as presented. Mr. Torres presented the Aquatic Park proposed capital projects budget for 2005-06. Mr. Torres reviewed the operations history and gave a status of the Strategic Plan. Mr. Torres highlighted ·the proposed capital improvements for fiscal year 2005-06 and discussed the funding sources for the new projects. Council concurred with the Parks Capital budget. Ms. Bostic presented a PowerPoint presentation of the Miscellaneous Capital Projects Budget. Council discussed the 2005/06 municipal facilities projects and the major capital equipment replacements. Council concurred with the Miscellaneous Capital Projects Budget and reconfirmed their consensus on the entire capital budget. Councilwoman Bielik commented that one of the items in unfinanced needs was safety glass for the Utility Billing Department and she would like the item to be reconsidered if fund-ing becomes available later in the year. Mayor Trevino recapped that through consensus of Council's discussions the past two days, debt issuance proposed for 2005/06 is $14,495,000 in general obligation and certificates of obligations. Mr. Cunningham advised a bond sale would be needed next spring. e The City Council Members reconfirmed their consensus with all budgets and funds. Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 9:50 a.m. APPROVED: Oscar Trevino - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary e ~ , e e e MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 08, 2005 PRE-COUNCIL SESSION The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in Pre-Council session on the 8th day of August, 2005 at 5:45 p.m. in the Pre-Council Room prior to the 7:00 regular Council meeting. Present: Oscar Trevino Tim Welch John Lewis Jo Cox Suzy Compton David Whitson Nancy Bielik Mayor Mayor Pro T em Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman . Councilwoman Absent: JoAnn Johnson Councilwoman Staff Members: Larry J. Cunningham Ogden Bo Bass Karen Bostic Patricia Hutson Alicia Richardson George Staples Mary Edwards John Pitstick Jimmy Perdue Dave Pendley Mike Curtis Dave Green Richard Abernethy Jimmy Cates City Manager Assistant City Manager Managing Director Administrative/Fiscal Services City Secretary Assistant City Secretary City Attorney Public Information Officer Director of Development Police Chief Building Official Public Works Director Director of Planning Assistant to City Manager Public Works Operations Manager Call to Order Mayor Trevino called the Pre-Council meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. 1. Discuss items from Regular August 08. 2005 City Council Meeting Agenda Item 7c, FP 2005-11 - Councilwoman Cox questioned if the lots would be zero lot lines and asked the size of the homes. Staff advised that it would be separate detached single-family residences with 1450 to 1700 square foot homes. 2. IR 2005-105 Review Proposed Roadway Memorial Marker Program t e e e City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 2 Mr. Jimmy Cates, Public Works Operations Manager, presented a PowerPoint presentation of a proposed Roadway Memorial Marker Program. Mr. Cates advised council the purpose of this policy is to establish procedures for the uniform placement of memorial markers within the street rights-of-way to: memorialize people who have died as a result of a vehicle-related accident on city maintained streets in the City of North Richland Hills; raise public awareness of the need for safe driving practices; and ensure uniformity of memorial markers on public rights-of-way. Mr. Cates advised requests for memorial markers within street rights-of-way shall be submitted in writing to the Operations Manager, North Richland Hills Public Works Department. Requests may be submitted by immediate family members or friends or requests from friends with required written approval of the deceased's immediate family. Requests must be made within a year of the incident with consideration being given for difficult circumstances. Mr. Cates advised only one memorial marker per incident shall be erected with the cost of the marker sign being paid by the requesting person(s). The installation, maintenance and removal of memorial marker will be the responsibility of the City of North Richland Hills. Memorial markers shall not be installed within the limits of active maintenance zones and will b~ located at the back edge of the mowing limits. In the case for urban area curb and gutter sections, the memorial marker may not necessarily be placed at the exact location of the fatality due to restricted space/right-of-way, property owner complaints, sight distance or other constraints. The exact location will be at the discretion of the Public Works Operations Manager. The memorial marker shall remain in place and be maintained by the City for a minimum of two (2) years. If after two (2) years the memorial marker has been removed for any reason, it may be replaced by following the initial request procedure. Memorial markers installed by private citizens and outside of this policy shall be deemed to be in violation of this policy. All such installation shall be immediately removed by North Richland Hills Public Works. Mr. Cates advised multiple memorial markers would not be allowed. Mayor Trevino asked if Council wanted Staff to proceed with development of the program. The consensus of the Council was for Staff to move forward with the development of the program and to bring back to Council for approval. 3. IR 2005-104 Presentation by John Baen. Ph. D. Regarding Oil and Gas Drilling Dr. John Baen, Professor of Real Estate at the University of North Texas, discussed with Council his cost benefit analysis, ad valorem tax benefits and impacts of oil and gas drilling on municipal property. Mr. Baen responded to Council questions on drilling, pad sites, production, safety, and environmental impact. After discussion of Agenda Item 4, the Mayor returned to Item 3. Mayor Trevino commented that land use and zoning issues would be involved and Council needed to consider whether to send item to the Planning & Zoning Commission. e e e City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 3 The consensus of the Council was to send it to the Planning & Zoning Commission for their input and consideration. Council commented that they would like the Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing and receive public input on the matter. 4. IR 2005-103 Discuss Hours of Outdoor Construction Activities Mr. Dave Pendley, Building Official, advised the Council the City has received a request from a citizen and several complaints on the hours of outdoor construction activity. Current ordinance allows o·utdoor construction activities between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. during central standard time and 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. during daylight savings time. Mr. Pendley advised a survey was conducted of area cities and most cities do not allow construction activities to begin earlier than 7:00 a.m. Mr. Pendley requested Council input on whether they would like Staff to bring forward an ordinance to ·modify the hours of construction activity. The consensus of the Council was to not change the hours for construction activity. 5. . Executive Session Mayor Trevino announced at 6:31 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to Executive Session as authorized by Texas Government Code Section 551.072 to deliberate the lease of municipal real property for mineral development. 6. Adiournment Mayor Trevino announced at 6:42 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to the regular Council meeting. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order August 08, 2005 at 7:01 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Oscar Trevino Tim Welch John Lewis Jo Cox Suzy Compton Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman e e e City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 4 David Whitson Nancy Bielik Councilman Councilwoman Absent: JoAnn Johnson Councilwoman Staff: Larry J. Cunningham Ogden Bo Bass Richard Torres Patricia Hutson Alicia Richardson George Staples City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Assistant City Secretary Attorney 2. INVOCATION Councilwoman Cox gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilwoman Cox led the pledge of allegiance. 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. 5. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Maury Siskel, 4516 Cummings Drive, spoke about recent federal legislation that changed the definition of eminent domain. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None. e e e City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 5 7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED A. MINUTES OF THE JULY 25, 2005 COUNCIL MEETING B. AP 2005-01 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM TODD A. BARNES AND BETTY C. RESTREPO TO APPROVE THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 3R & 9R, BLOCK 6 EDEN ADDITION (LOCATED AT 8959 AND 8963 BRADLEY DRIVE- 0.556 ACRES) C. FP 2005-11 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM MCCAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF PLEASANT DREAM ADDITION (LOCATED NORTH OF THE 8100 BLOCK OF BRIDGE STREET - 3.79 ACRES) COUNCilMAN LEWIS MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCilWOMAN BIELIK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6-0. 8. LRB 2005-02 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM B&B CUSTOM HOMES FOR APPROVAL OF A LANDSCAPE VARIANCE (LOCATED IN THE 5600 BLOCK OF DAVIS BOULEVARD - 6.601 ACRES) APPROVED Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Breece Higgins, 728 Trails End Drive, Hurst, TX and Tre Dribell, Project Engineer for B&B Custom Homes were available to answer questions from council. Nature of request is to request a variance from the landscape variance to allow encroachment of landscape setbacks for the parking of vehicles as well as vehicle maneuvering areas. The proposed encroachment will only be at two locations - between Lots 2 &3 and between Lots 6 & 7. Applicant feels the encroachment is necessary in order to meet current parking requirements for the proposed office development. City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 6 e Chief Planner Dave Green summarized case and advised council the requested variance did not lessen the integrity of the ordinance. Mr. Green was available to answer questions from council. Mayor Trevino asked if there was anyone wishing'to speak in favor of request to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak in favor, Mayor Trevino asked for those wishing to speak against request to come forward. Mr. Gary Swinczynski, 7825 Emerald Hills, spoke in opposition. Mr. Dave Conte, 5621 Galaway Lane, asked which trees would be affected by proposal. Mr. Conte asked for clarification of a landscape variance. Mr. Conte inquired if the variance dealt specifically with the tree or did it include the whole development. Mayor Trevino advised it was only the trees and not the whole plat. Mr. Conte asked if an environmental impact had ~een·completed to access how the drainage would affect the neighborhood. Mayor Trevino advised the Public Works Director would address Mr. Conte's question during the next time. e There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. C:OUNCILMAN LEWIS MOVED TO APPROVE LRB 2005-02. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6-0. 9. SP 2005-06 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM B & B CUSTOM HOMES FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR A SKILLED NURSING CENTER AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE COMPLEX (LOCATED IN THE 5600 BLOCK OF DAVIS BOULEVARD - 6.601 ACRES) APPROVED Nature of request is for a 128 bed skilled nursing facility and professional office complex. Applicant presented a landscape variance for council consideration prior to this request. The request will include a 41 ,500 square foot skilled nursing facility (lot 1) and six office buildings ranging in size from 2,750 square feet to 3,750 square feet in size. e e e e City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 7 Applicants Breece Higgins, B & B Custom Homes; Scott Luke, owner of facility; and Tre Dibrell, engineer on project were available to answer questions. Councilwoman Cox asked for a definition of a skilled nursing center. Mr. Higgins advised a skilled nursing center is 24 hour nursing care. Chief Planner Dave Director summarized case and was available to answer questions from Council. Mr. Green advised council C-1 uses are permitted by right in current zoning, but the proximity to residential area required a site plan. Public Works Director Mike Curtis addressed drainage and the detention pond. MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE SP 2005-06. C:OUNCILWOMAN COMPTON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6-0. 10. ZC 2005-08 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM JOHNSON DIVERSIFIED ENTERPRISES FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM "C2" COMMERCIAL TO "RI-PD" RESIDENTIAL INFILL-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (LOCATED IN THE 7600 & 7700 BLOCKS OF DAVIS BOULEVARD - 7.5 ACRES) - ORDINANCE NO. 2841 APPROVED Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Nature of request is to consider a zoning change from C2 to RI-PD to construct 5.5 houses per acre with minimum house size being 1 ,800 square feet and the minimum lot area being 4,340 square feet. The development would include the following amenities: home owners association, curvilinear streets, divided, landscaped, entryway from Davis Boulevard, masonry screen wall along Davis Boulevard frontage with varied setback, varied front building setback, minimum 6' garage setback behind front of house, landscaped (irrigated) open space throughout, brick or stamped concrete pavers in street, gazebo in open space area, private streets and cast iron decorative street lights and mail boxes. Mr. Ben Johnson, applicant, who resides at 1712 Colleyville, outlined his request and established current building and zoning along Precinct Line Road and Davis. Mr. City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 8 e Johnson advised council of his belief that commercial is not the only use that would work along Davis. Councilwoman Cox asked staff for their opinion of the zoning change request. Mr. Green advised council the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is a starting point for land uses. Mr. Green stated there were advantages to stretching out commercial as well as having commercial located at intersections. Mr. Green advised it is best to have commercial at an intersection rather than stretching along a section of a street. Mayor Trevino called for those wishing to speak in favor of request to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino asked for anyone wishing to speak against request to come forward. Ms. Dorothy Parker, 509 West L. D. Lockett, Colleyville, TX asked if the flood plain would be addressed. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Cox told staff she would like to see an updated Comprehensive Land Use Plan. e Councilwoman Bielik believes Davis Boulevard should remain commercial. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON MOVED TO APPROVE ZC 2005-08. COUNCILMAN LEWIS SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 4-2 WITH COUNCILMEN LEWIS,. WHITSON, MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH AND COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON VOTING FOR APPROVAL AND COUNCILWOMEN COX AND BIELIK VOTING AGAINST APPROVAL. 11. ZC 2005-11 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM COZY WATER PROPERTIES, INC. FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "R2" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (LOCATED IN THE 6900 BLOCK OF CLIFT STREET - 1.906 ACRES) - ORDINANCE NO. 2842 DENIED Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Nature of request is to consider a zoning change from AG to R2 for the purpose of developing a small residential subdivision. e e e e City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 9 Mr. David Cole, applicant, who resides at 4902 Colleyville Boulevard, presented his case to the council, responded to concern~ outlined in the petition and disputed comment made by Planning and Zoning Commission member Randy Shiflet regarding whether Clift street could support the weight of emergency vehicles. Mr. Cole advised council he has a letter from the Fire Department refuting Mr. Shiflet's comment. Mr. Cole advised council the Planning and Zoning Chair advised R-2 makes sense but can not schedule plat until applicant is able to present plat with five lots to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Cole advised if Council were to approve R-2 he would be willing to present five lots to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Chief Planner Dave Green summarized case and advised council staff had received a petition of opposition with signatures from 46.8% of the owners within 200' of the proposed site. A petition of 200/0 or more of the land within 200' of a zoning request requires a favorable vote of three-fourths of present members of the council to approve zoning change request. Council discussed the options and legality of changing zoning to R-1 for this property. Mr. Green advised council the request was advertised for R-2, but the council could approve something less intense and dense, but staff would need separate descriptions of each lot. Mayor Trevino asked for anyone wishing to speak in favor of request to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino asked for anyone wishing to speak in opposition of request to come forward. The following spoke in opposition: Carol Brandt, 8908 Amundson Drive; Ginger Burton, 6921 Clift Street; Randy Burton, 6921 Clift Street; Robert Mosley, 6925 Clift Street; Eric Anderson, 6828 Clift Street and Mary Jane Munoz, 6901 Clift Street. There being no one else wishing to speak in opposition, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. COUNCILMAN LEWIS MOVED TO TABLE ITEM TO ALLOW APPLICANT TIME TO REGROUP. MOTION DIED DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND. City Attorney George Staples advised council a denial of request tonight would not prohibit applicant from submitting a different request to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH MOVED TO DENY ZC 2005-11. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK SECONDED THE MOTION. Councilman Whitson asked for a friendly amendment that would include waiving of fees associated with resubmitting request. e e e City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 10 Councilman Whitson withdrew amendment. MOTION TO DENY CARRIED 6-0. 12. SRB 2005-02 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A SIGN VARIANCE REQUEST BY JAY ALMQUIST ON BEHALF OF MEADOW LAKES RETIREMENT COMMUNITY LOCATED AT 5000 MEADOW LAKES DRIVE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 106 OF THE NORTH RICH LAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES - SIGN REGULATIONS DENIED Mayor Trevino opened the public hearing. Nature of request is to install a new 60 square foot wall sign on the north side of Meadow Lakes Retirement Community's existing structure. The appl~cant is requesting a variance to allow a wall sign on a façade that exceeds the maximur!t allowable size by approximately thirty-five (35) square feet or 140%. Mr. Jay Almquist, applicant, summarized his request and was available to answer questions from council. Mr. Almquist advised council he had received a letter of support from Richland Hills Church of Christ. Councilman Lewis asked Mr. Almquist if he would consider reducing the size of the sign. Mr. Almquist advised that is something he would be willing to consider. Councilwoman Compton asked Mr. Almquist for the occupancy turnover rate for his establishment. Councilwoman Compton also asked for the total number of units at Meadow Lakes and how many of those were vacant. Mr. Almquist advised they have 120 units and 110 of those are currently rented. Ms. Carol Burnell, Regional Manager of Meadow Lakes, advised council the signage would be facing Loop 820 and not the neighborhood. Chief Building Official Dave Pendley advised council the applicant has not demonstrated any unique or physical characteristics that would constitute a hardship. Mayor Trevino asked for anyone wishing to speak in favor of request to come forward. Mr. Gary Stanz, President of Covenant Group and owner of Meadow Lakes and the Goode Place, spoke in favor of request. City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 11 e There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino asked for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing. COUNCILMAN-LEWIS MOVED TO DENY SRB 2005..02. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO DENY CARRIED 5-1; WITH COUNCILMEN LEWIS, WHITSON, MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH AND COUNCILWOMEN COX AND COMPTON VOTING IN FAVOR OF DENIAL AND COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK VOTING AGAINST DENIAL. Mayor Trevino recessed the council meeting at 9:44 p.m. Mayor Trevino reconvened the council meeting at 9:53 p.m. with same members present. . 13. GN 2005-077 APPROVE SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT ZONE FOR THE WALKER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - ORDINANCE NO. 2843 APPROVED e Nature of request is to amend the Code of Ordinances to incorporate speed limits in the school zone for the newly constructed Walker Creek Elementary located in the Home Town area. Staff is recommending the speed limits of 20 miles per hour during the hours of 7:15 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and 2:15 p.m. to 3:45 p.m. for the following streets: 8700-8800 blocks of Bridge Street; 8900-9100 blocks of Parker Boulevard and 8800- 9000 blocks of Cardinal Lane. Public Works Operations Manager Jimmy Cates summarized item for council and was available to answer questions. C:OUNCILWOMAN COMPTON MOVED TO APPROVE ORDINANCE No. 2843. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6-0. 14. GN 2005-078 APPROVE RESOLUTION SUPPORTING LOCAL PROJECTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE TARRANT COUNTY BOND PROGRAM - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-057 APPROVED e City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 12 e Nature of request is to approve resolution supporting local projects to be included in Tarrant County's bond program for voter consideration in May 2006. Public Works Director Mike Curtis was available to answer questions from council. COUNCILWOMAN BIEUK MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2005-78. MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6-0. 15. GN 2005-079 SETTING DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR 2005-06 CITY BUDGET, PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT BUDGETS APPROVED e Budget Director Drew Corn advised council it was necessary to set public hearings on the proposed 2005-2006 city budget, proposed projects and operations of the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation and the Crime Control and Prevention District budgets. Mr. Corn advised council the public hearings are set for August 22, 2005 beginning at 6: 15 p.m. for the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation, 6:30 p.m. for the Crime Control and Prevention District and 7:00 p.m. for the city budget. COUNCILMAN WHITSON MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2005-079. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6-0. 16. GN 2005-080 SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED TAX RATE AND RECORD VOTE ON PLACING THE TAX RATE ADOPTION ON THE SEPTEMBER 26, 2005 COUNCIL AGENDA APPROVED Mr. Corn advised council it was necessary to begin the notice and public hearing procedure to establish a tax rate for the next fiscal year. Council at their budget work session on July 29-30, 2005 had consensus to set the tax rate at 57¢. The tax rate is e the same as the current year and if approved will be the thirteenth consecutive year the City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 13 e tax rate has been 57¢. Mr. Corn advised council if a municipality imposes a tax rate that exceeds the effective tax rate, the municipality is required to have a record vote to place a proposal to adopt the tax rate on a future agenda meeting for council action. Mr. Corn informed council State law requires a municipality to hold two public hearings if the proposed tax rate exceeds the effective tax rate. The first public hearing is proposed to be held on August 22, 2005 and the second public hearing is proposed for September 12, 2005. State law also requires that a tax rate be adopted no sooner than seven days after the second public hearing and no later than 14 days after the second public hearing. COUNCILMAN WHITSON MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2005-080. C·OUNCILWOMAN BIEUK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6..0. 17. ACTION ON ANY ITEM DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION LISTED ON PRE- COUNCIL AGENDA APPROVED e Lease of City Property for Mineral Development (PU 2005-033) MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH MOVED TO APPROVE PU 2005..033, FINDING IT ADVISABLE TO LEASE CITY LAND FOR MINERAL DEVELOPMENT AND THAT STAFF BE DIRECTED TO PREPARE SPECIFICATIONS FOR BIDDING AND PUBUSH NOTICES REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 71 OF THE TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCES CODE. C:OUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6-0. 18. INFORMATION AND REPORTS Councilwoman Compton made the following announcements. Please join us for a reception on Tuesday, August 9, to welcome Police Chief Jimmy Perdue. The "come and go" reception will be held at the Iron Horse Golf Course Clubhouse and Pavilion from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. u.S. Congressman Michael Burgess will hold a Town Hall Meeting from 2 to 3 p.m. on Saturday, August 13. The meeting will be held in our City Council Chambers. Congressman Burgess will provide an update on recent legislative issues and will e City Council Minutes August, 08 2005 Page 14 . answer questions. For more information, please call the Congressman's District office at 817-531-8454. The next training session for the NRH Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) . will begin on September 6. The training will be held on Tuesday evenings and some Saturdays through November 1. Please call Sean Hughes at 817-427-6969 for registration information. Kudos Korner - Dave Green and Staff, Planning and Zoning Department - An e-mail was received from a new NRH Business thanking the Planning and Zoning Department for their assistance in expediting the building process for LIFE Church. The chairman of the church's building committee was highly complementary of the staff and their work. 19. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 10:04 p.m. e Oscar Trevino - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary e ,# CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ,J Department: City Manaqer's Office Council Meeting Date: 08/22/05 Subject: Contract AuthorizinQ Pass- ThrouQh State Grant Aareement Agenda Number: GN 2005-081 for NETS - Resolution No. 2005-058 A contract proposal between North Richland Hills and the Texas Depa-rtment of Transportation has been received providing for the continuation of State funding for the Northeast Transportation Service (NETS). The City is acting as a pass-through conduit for the grant funds. No City funding is required to administer the contract. NETS provides on-call transportation service to the elderly and disabled in many cities in northeast Tarrant County. The primary focus of the service is to provide transportation to places of employment and medical appointments. The contract for the grant agreement becomes effective September 1, 2005, or as soon as it is executed, and expires August 31, 2006. This contract does not effect the City's budgeted participation in the NETS program. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005- 058 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Avallacle Finance Director ~~Þ.~ De~artment Head Si ature Page 1 of 1 .. , " Resolution No. 2005- 058 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: THAT the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a contract with the Texas Department of Transportation for a pass through State Grant Agreement for the Northeast Transportation Service (NETS), as the act and deed of the City of North Richland Hills. PASSED and APPROVED on this 22nd day of August 2005 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Os.car Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George Staples, City Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 8/22/2005 Subject: Authorize Interlocal PurchasinQ AQreement with the Agenda Number: PU 2005-034 City of Keller - Resolution No. 2005-059 The City of Keller is requesting to enter into an interlocal purchasing agreement with the City for the purchase of goods and services from vendors selected through the competitive bidding process. The City of Keller is interested in purchasing from the City of North Richland Hills contracts such as the document imaging and aquatic chemical supply. This agreement will be mutually beneficial to Keller and North Richland Hills because purchasing larger quantities will reduce the overall expense to each agency. Each agency will place their orders and pay the vendors directly. North Richland Hills or the City of Keller may change or cancel the agreement with a 3D-day written agreement. The City currently participates in interlocal agreements with several area cities. Some of the agreements are with the City of Fort Worth for the purchase of fuel, Tarrant County for the purchase of office supplies and the City of Hurst for the purchase of auto parts. . Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005-059. . Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Availa e Budget Director ,,-/ I Lt~"'~-Finance Director V' í-' :-J¿2~ /~- -- OeD' ment Head Sianature \\\ \~, ( ~~ , .... Page 1 of ...L . . . RESOLUTION NO. 2005-059 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS, that: 1 . The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the interlocal agreement with the City of Keller authorizing each entity to purchase goods and services from vendors selected through the competitive bidding process. PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of August, 2005. APPROVED: Oscar Trevino Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: '-Þ ~ '~~- ~. Larry KOD e, Director of Finance CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 8/22/05 Subject: Approve Final Payment to McClendon Construction Agenda Number: PAY 2005-005 Company in the amount of $19,999.44 for Douglas Lane (Hightower Drive to 200' north) with the required Storm Drain Improvements This project was awarded by Council on April 12, 2004 (PW 2004-010) to McClendon Construction Company Inc. for $179,226.75. The project consisted of the reconstruction of Douglas Lane from Hightower Drive to 200' north. This section of Douglas Lane was reconstructed to accommodate the construction of the new Fire Station #4 located at the northwest corner of Douglas Lane and Hightower Drive. The project is now complete with all final adjustments having been made. Final payment will make the contractor's total earnings on the project $178,394.40, which is $832 under the contract amount. Recommendation: To approve final payment in the amount of $19,999.44 to McClendon Construction Company, Inc. for the construction of Douglas Lane (Hightower Drive to 200' north) with the required storm drain improvements. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number ST0402 Sufficient Funds Ävallaole I....J ¡/ c..L~_ Finance Director ...-'"'i/t j ~ (:' ~ hi\. : l~c l 1;:'. Department Head S;'gnature Page 1 of _ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: BudÇJet and Research Council Meeting Date: 8/22/05 Subject: Conduct Public HearinQ on Proposed Tax Rate Agenda Number: GN 2005-082 Senate Bill 18 that was passed during the regular 79th Session of the Texas Legislature made several changes to the way the tax rate must be adopted. One of the changes is the requirement to hold two public hearings on the proposed property tax rate if the proposed rate exceeds the effective tax rate. Because the proposed rate of 57¢ is higher than the effective tax rate of 56.0655¢, we must hold two public hearings. Tonight's hearing is the first of the two required hearings. Senate Bill 18 also has very specific requirements on how to publish notice of the public hearings. Notice of the public hearings was duly posted in the Northeast Section of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram on August 12, 2005 per state law. Senate Bill 18 also requires us to phrase the notice of public hearing on the tax rate as a "tax increase" because the proposed tax rate is above the effective tax rate. As you may remember, the effective tax rate is basically the property tax rate necessary to produce the same amount of property tax revenues as the prior year. The second of the required public hearings is scheduled for September 12, 2005. The tax rate is scheduled to be adopted on September 26, 2005 during the regular 7:00 pm City Council meeting. The proposed tax rate for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 is 57¢. If adopted, this will be the thirteenth consecutive year the City has maintained a 57¢ tax rate. . Individual taxpayers' property taxes may decrease, increase or stay the same depending on the appraised value of their property. Per the Tarrant Appraisal District, as of August 11, 2005, 202 single family residential properties had values that decreased as compared to last year, 3,859 have increased and 11 ,907 have stayed the same. With the exception of senior and disabled property owners, this will affect property taxes accordingly. There are currently 2,809 senior property owners and 284 disabled property owners who have a tax ceiling; even if their property values have increased they will pay the same amount of property tax as the previous year. The City of North Richland Hills is proud of the progress we have made while demonstrating sound financial management of our Citizen's tax dollars. Recommendation: To open the public hearing and receive public comments on the proposed 57¢ tax rate and announce September 26, 2005 as the date of the tax rate adoption Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Avai a e . Budget Manager D&e~ead Sianature "W Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 8/22/05 Subject: Approve Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy - Agenda Number: GN2005-083 Resolution No. 2005-060 Staff is frequently required to remove graffiti and non-conforming signs from street rights-of-way and drainage structures as it is unsightly and often unsafe. Graffiti and non-conforming signs, whether they be associated with pranks or with incidents as serious as fatality accidents have the tendency to encourage others to place additional graffiti in other locations of the City. Many times the graffiti just creates maintenance issues for staff, but depending on the type, size and location of the graffiti unsafe conditions such as reduced site distance could be created. Staff therefore tak~s a zero tolerance position on any graffiti or non-conforming signs placed within public rights-of-way. The Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy presented for Council consideration will provide staff an additional way to minimize graffiti and non-conforming markers. It also provides the opportunity for very tragic incidents, such as fatality accidents, to serve as positive reminders to drivers of the importance of roadway safety awareness. This policy has two primary purposes: 1. Raise public awareness of the need for safe driving; and 2. Minimize graffiti and non-conforming signs. The policy allows immediate family members to make a request for a safety awareness sign at a location where a fatality accident has occurred. All requests will be reviewed by a designated staff member, the Public Works Operations Manager. If in the opinion of the Public Works Operations Manager the request meets the intent of the policy, a safety awareness sign will be allowed. All denials by staff may be appealed to the City Council for a final decision. The policy also allows for different "safety awareness" phrases to be indicated on the sign. For example, the sign may read "Drive Safely," "Drive Friendly," "Wear Seatbelts," or "Don't Drink and Drive." The name of the deceased may be added to the sign if requested by an immediate family member. The attached policy does not include provisions to allow a distinction to be made between the cause or fault of the accident. Staff's primary purpose is to raise public awareness of safe driving independent of the cause or fault of the accident. Staff will be available for questions. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005-060. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds Ävallable ~/~:t~ C1~' D partment Head Signature Finance Director Page 1 of _ . . . RESOLUTION NO. 2005-060 that: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, 1. Whereas the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills and its staff desire to raise public awareness of the need for safe driving, while minimizing graffiti and non- conforming signs in the street rights-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the attached Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy shall be approved by passage of this Resolution. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 22nd day of August, 2005. Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: George Staples, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: }1Jt:tl~ CA~- Mike Curtis, P.E., Public Works Director . . . City of North Richland Hills Title: Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy Date Adopted: August 22, 2005 August22,2005 Effective Date: It shall be the policy of the City of North Richland Hills that a policy entitled "Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy" (the Policy) is hereby adopted, to wit: 1. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish procedures for the uniform placement of "safety awareness" signs or markers within the street rights-of-way at the location of a fatality accident in order to: A. Raise public awareness of the need for safe driving practices; and B. Minimize graffiti and non-conforming signs along street rights-of-way. 2. Procedures for Placement of Safety Awareness Markers in Street Rights-of- Way A. Requests for safety awareness markers within street rights-of-way shall be submitted in writing to the Operations Manager, North Richland Hills Public Works Department, 7200-A Dick Fisher Drive South, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180. All requests will require written approval of the deceased's immediate family. The request must be made within 12 months of the incident, but consideration will be given for difficult circumstances. B. Placement of the deceased name on the safety awareness marker will be at the immediate family's option. Any additional decorations or ornaments will not be allowed. Only one memorial marker per incident shall be placed. c. The cost for the safety awareness marker sign will be paid by the requesting person(s). Installation, maintenance and removal of the marker will be the responsibility of the City of North Richland Hills. D. The safety awareness marker shall consist of a 24" x 18" aluminum panel with blue background of engineering grade sheeting and white letters. Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy Page 1 of 3 August 22, 2005 . The safety awareness marker shall be installed at a height of 42" from ground elevation. An example is provided. E. Safety awareness markers shall be constructed and installed by the City of North Richland Hills in accordance with city standards. The markers shall not be installed within the limits of active maintenance and construction zones. F. For urban area curb and gutter street sections, the safety awareness marker may not necessarily be placed at the exact location of the fatality due to restricted space/right-of-way, property owner complaints, sight distance or other constraints. The exact location will be at the discretion of the Public Works Operations Manager. The requesting party will be made aware of the reasons for the chosen marker location. G. The marker shall remain in place and be maintained by the City for a minimum of two (2) years unless it becomes necessary to remove it. If after two (2) years the marker has been removed for any reason, it may be replaced by following the initial request procedure. The City will have the right to remove any safety awareness marker after the two (2) year period. H. Any marker installed by private citizens shall be deemed to be in violation of this policy. All such installation shall be immediately removed by North Richland Hills Public Works. . I. Multiple incidents at a location will be reviewed by staff to determine the appropriate safety awareness marker. Multiple markers will not be allowed. J. All requests for safety awareness markers shall be approved by the Public Works Operations Manager. A request may be denied if in the opinion of the Public Works Operations Manager it does not meet the intent of this policy. All denied requests may be appealed to the City Council during an official City Council Meeting. K. Safety awareness markers may indicate "Drive Safely", "Drive Friendly" "Wear Seatbelts" or "Don't Drink and Drive". The exact sign will be coordinated with the requesting party, but final approval will be made by the Public Works Operations Manager. . Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy Page 2 of 3 August 22, 2005 · · · 3. Non-Eligible Street Rights-of-Way A. This policy does not apply to public rights-of-way maintained by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). B. The safety awareness marker sign cannot be placed on local residential streets as identified by the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. 4. Eligible Street Rights-of Way The following locations in the City of North Richland Hills are eligible for placement of the safety awareness sign: · Amundson Drive (Main Street to Precinct Line Road) · Bedford-Euless Road (Strummer Drive to Grapevine Highway) · Booth Calloway Road (Northeast Loop 820 to Glenview Drive) · Bursey Road (Rufe Snow Drive to Douglas Lane) · Glenview Drive (Grapevine Highway to Hurst City Limits) · Harwood Road (Grapevine Highway to Hurst City Limits) · Holiday Lane (Lola Drive to Mid-Cities Boulevard) · Main Street (Davis Boulevard to Amundson Road) · Mid-Cities Boulevard (Rufe Snow Drive to Precinct Line Road) · North Tarrant Parkway (Precinct Line Road to Keller City Limits) · Onyx Drive South (Wendell Drive to Billie Faye Drive) · Richland Plaza (Broadway Avenue to Grapevine Highway) · Rufe Snow Drive (Grapevine Highway to Mid-Cities Boulevard) · Rufe Snow Drive (East side of right-of-way only. Mid-Cities Boulevard to Bursey Road) · Rumfield Road (Precinct Line Road to Spring Oak Drive) · Shady Grove Road (Davis Boulevard to Clay Hibbins Road) · Simmons Drive (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Cardinal Lane) · Smithfield Road (Davis Boulevard to Cortland Avenue) 5. Sign Cost The City of North Richland Hills charges $100.00 for the safety awareness marker sign. This cost includes all labor and material costs. Staff will evaluate the cost of the sign on an annual basis. The City must receive payment before the sign can be installed. Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy Page 3 of 3 August 22, 2005 · City of North Richland Hills Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Application 1. TYPE OF REQUEST Initial Renewal Removal Important: Please read the Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy before completing this form. Please print all information clearly. Illegible printing could result in an incorrect marker. 2. NAME OF DECEASED TO BE INSCRIBED ON MARKER (NO NICKNAMES OR TITLES PERMITTED) FIRST (Or Initial) MIDDLE (Or Initial) LAST SUFFIX 3. TODAY'S DATE (mm-dd-year) 4. DATE OF DEATH (mm-dd-year) 5. ACCIDENT LOCATION (Be as specific as possible) 6. ARE YOU: (This form must be signed by an immediate family member) 7. PRINT NAME & DAYTIME CONTACT PHONE NUMBER D IMMEDIATE FAMILY D FRIEND D OTHER 8. PRINT NAME AND ADDRESS OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER 9. DAYTIME PHONE NUMBER OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER 10. E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional) 11. SIGNATURE OF PERSON WHOSE NAME APPEARS IN BLOCK 6 12. DATE (mm-dd-year) 13. SIGNATURE OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER 14. DATE (mm-dd-year) DATE RECEIVED APPLICATION VERIFIED DYes D No APPROVED DATE INSTALLATION DATE . . ......................u........_......_ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 08/22/2005 Subject: Award of Contract for Professional AuditinQ Services to Patillo, Brown & Hill, L.L.P. - Resolution No. 2005-061 Deloitte & Touche, L.L.P. has performed the audit for the City of North Richland Hills for the last five years. While the City does not have a policy mandating the periodic rotation of auditors, management believes that it is good practice to request proposals periodically to ensure the City is receiving the best possible audit services. Prior to this occasion, the last time the City requested proposals for auditing services was in 2000. On June 9, 2005 the City requested proposals for Professional Auditing Services from local, regional, and national accounting firms by direct mail and newspaper advertisement. The proposal specifications were prepared by staff to ensure conformance with nationally accepted governmental auditing standards while promoting and protecting the interests of the City of North Richland Hills. The proposal described relevant aspects of the audit process from start to finish. The term 'of the engagement will be for fiscal years 2005, 2006, and 2007 with two optional one-year renewals. Services to be provided include, but are not limited to, the annual audit of the City's financial statements, review and printing of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, State and Federal Grant auditing and reporting, and compliance testing of the requirements of the Texas Public Funds Investment Act as amended. Agenda Number: PU 2005-035 The proposals submitted by each firm were separated into two major components: a Technical Proposal describing the proposing firm in depth and their audit management approach and a Sealed Dollar Cost Proposal that contained the cost of services for the first three years of the proposed contract. The following firms submitted proposals: Deloitte & Touche; Patillo, Brown & Hill; Rylander, Clay & Opitz; and, Weaver and Tidwell. The proposals were evaluated using these major criteria: 1) mandatory elements such as independence and audit quality; 2) technical qualifications such as experience and expertise and audit approach; 3) ability to meet the City's deadlines; and, 4) cost of services. The proposals were reviewed by a five member Proposal Review Committee comprised of: 80 Bass, Assistant City Manager Larry Koonce, Director of Finance Jackie Theriot, Accounting Manager Toni VanHooser, Accountant II Fred Werner, Director of Finance, City of Grapevine Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Accou nt N umber 001-9898-526.32-05/405-9898-712.32-05 Sufficient Funds Available " , ¿L:'Ÿ1~ Finance Director '~ / .:£-¡ /14" / é~--z;,~ Dep~me'nt Head Signature vi Page 1 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS After careful review and consideration of all the critical elements involved, the committee concluded the best proposal was submitted by the accounting firm of Patillo, Brown & Hill, L.L.P. of Waco. The firm's proposal offered quality services at the best price. As such, the committee recommends award of the contract to Patillo, Brown & Hill, L.L.P. The firm has extensive experience in municipal auditing and ranked high in all technical areas of evaluation. They are curr~ntly serving over 100 governmental clients. Their references include, but are not limited to, the City of Waco, the City of Duncanville, the City of Colleyville, the City of San Marcos and several counties including Collin County and Denton County. Patillo, Brown & Hill, L.L.P. also submitted the lowest three-year cost of services proposal. The three-year cost of services proposals for each firm were as follows: Patillo, Brown & Hill Weaver and Tidwell Rylander, Clay & Opitz Deloitte & Touche $228,000 $233,656 $236,260 $306,822 For the fiscal year 2005 audit, $101 ,500 was budgeted for external audit services. The cost quoted by Patillo, Brown & Hill L.L.P. for the 2005 audit of $75,000 results in budget savings of $26,500. Should a Single Audit not be required for 2005, only the costs for the financial audit ($67,280) will be incurred resulting in an additional savings of $7,720. The contract gives the City the right to review the auditor's performance each year. Acceptable performance reviews will be necessary to continue auditing services the following year. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2005- 061 CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 2 of 2 . . . RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 061 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1 . The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the contract for professional auditing services with Patillo, Brown, & Hill, L.L.P. for fiscal years 2005, 2006, and 2007 with two optional one-year renewals, at a three-year cost of $228,000 as the act and deed of the City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of August 2005. APPROVED: Oscar Trevino Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ,. ...t V ~\'vvl /LF-c-J.,-e-J--. Larry KooJ)þe, Director of Finance REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES NRH . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES This contract is made and entered into this day of August 2005 by and between the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a municipal corporation in Tarrant County, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and Patillo, Brown & Hill, L.L.P., CPAs, (hereinafter referred to as the "Auditor"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City is a municipal corporation of the State of Texas, located at City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180, wherein the books and records of said City are kept, and WHEREAS, the Auditor is a Certified Public Accountant, duly licensed in said capacity in the State of Texas, having paid all fees pursuant to such licensing, and the City being willing to employ Auditor on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: Terms and Conditions 1. The Request for Proposals for Professional Auditing Services dated June 9, 2005 is incorporated into this agreement and all conditions and requirements of the Request for Proposals are hereinafter considered to be part of this agreement. . The initial contract shall be for a term of three years with two one-year renewal options. At the completion of each contract year, the Evaluation Committee will perform a review of the Auditor's performance. Acceptable performance reviews will be necessary to continue auditing services the following fiscal year. 2. The fees for audit services shall be as follows. Years two and three are contingent on Auditor receiving acceptable performance reviews. Fiscal Year Financial Audit Sinale Audit Total not to Exceed 2005 $ 67,280 $ 7,720 $ 75,000 2006 $ 68,201 $ 7,799 $ 76,000 2007 $ 69.122 $ 7 .878 $ 77.000 Totals $204.603 $23.397 $228.000 . 1 . . . REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES NRH 3. While the objective of the examination is the expression of an unqualified opinion on the fair presentation of the financial statements of the City, it is understood that an opinion may have to be qualified or denied as the facts or circumstances dictate. The City has the responsibility for the proper recording of transactions in the books of account, for the safeguarding of assets, and for the substantial accuracy of the financial statements. Such are the representations of the City. In addition, it is understood that the examination is not primarily designed and cannot be relied upon to disclose defalcations and other similar irregularities, although their discovery may result. If irregularities are discovered, Auditor will report such irregularities to the City Manager, Director of Finance, or Accounting Manager as deemed appropriate. 4. City agrees to make progress payments on the basis of hours of work completed during the course of the engagement in accordance with the firm's dollar cost bid proposal. Interim billings shall cover a period of no less than one calendar month. Interim billings must include detail which reflects hours worked by staffing levels and the remaining estimated hours to completion. Invoices received without this information will be returned unpaid. Invoices for single audit services shall be prepared using the same detail specifications and timing for other billings mentioned previously. Invoices for single audit services shall not include any items other than those performed in connection with the single audit. Interim billings shall be sent based on percent of work completed, with final payment upon delivery of the Single Audit Reports. 5. Auditor agrees that it will not at any time, either directly or indirectly, disclose or communicate to any person, firm, or corporation in any manner whatsoever any information of any kind or description concerning any matters affecting or relating to the business of the City whether or not any or all such matters would otherwise be deemed confidential material, unless otherwise pursuant to law or is so directed by the City. 6. This contract may be modified or amended by mutual agreement of the parties. No waiver, modification, or amendment of any term, condition, or provision of this contract will be valid, or of any force or effect, unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. 7. A failure by the City to initiate action as to any breach shall not be deemed as a waiver of that right of action and all such initiated rights of action shall be cumulative. 8. This contract shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. 2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES NRH . 9. This contract shall be deemed to have been made and performed in Tarrant County, Texas. For purposes of venue, all suits or causes of action arising out of this contract shall be brought in the courts of Tarrant County, Texas. 10. It is agreed between the City and the Auditor that the contract shall be executed in an original and two (2) copies, anyone of which may be used for any purposes for which the original may be used. 11. It is the intent of the parties that nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to assign to Auditor any status under this Agreement other than that of an independent contractor. 12. Auditor covenants that to the best of its knowledge, neither it nor any of its partners or employees presently has any interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, in any matters subject to audit by the City or that would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services under this Agreement and that none of its partners are employees of the City, and that no one employed by the Auditor and no one who has or will have any financial interest under this Agreement is an officer or employee of the City. . 13. No discrimination because of race, color, sex, age, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or religion shall be made in the employment of persons performing services under this contract. Auditor covenants that it will comply with all nondiscrimination provisions of applicable federal law or executive order in the performance of this Agreement. 14. Indemnification Aareement As between the City and Auditor, the Auditor shall assume responsibility and liability only for any damage, loss, or injury caused by or resulting from the negligent acts of the Auditor, or any of its officers, agents, servants, or employees, arising from the performance of work under this Agreement. The Auditor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and all of its officers, agents, servants, or employees from and against any and such claims, loss, damage, charge, or expense to which they or any of them may reasonably be put or subjected by reason of any such negligent acts, but only if an adjudication of negligence is made against the Auditor. The Auditor expressly agrees to provide professional time, at no additional fee, required in the defense against any claim brought or actions filed against the City, where such claim or action arises from the negligent acts, but only if an adjudication of negligence is made against the Auditor. . 3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES NRH . 15. Insurance The Auditor certifies, and will provide insurance certificate with the signed contract, that it carries the following types of insurance: A. Statutory workers' compensation insurance or proof that such coverage is not required to be provided by Auditor under State law. B. Professional liability insurance on the contractual services in this contract with minimum limit of $1 ,000,000. C. Comprehensive liability insurance covering all operations and automobiles: i. With limits of $100,000/$300,000 bodily injury ii. With limit of $50,000 property damage D. Umbrella or excess coverage cannot be used to reach the limits stated in Band C. 16. This contract being one for professional services cannot be transferred, assigned, or sublet without the prior written approval of the City. . 17. This document contains the entire agreement between the parties and shall not be altered, varied, or modified unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. There are no understandings, representations, or agreements, written or oral, not incorporated herein. The terms of the engagement will also be confirmed in the annual engagement letter. 18. For purposes of this Agreement, any notices required to be sent to the parties hereof shall be mailed to the following respective addresses: AUDITOR CITY City of North Richland Hills Attn: Jackie Theriot 7301 Northeast Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, Texas 76180 . 4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES NRH . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and executed this Agreement the day and year written above. AUDITOR: CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS: Partner Oscar Trevino, Mayor Witness: Attest: Signature George Staples, City Attorney Name (typed or printed) . . 5 · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Information Services Council Meeting Date: 8/22/2005 Subject: Authorize Purchase of PubHc Safety Software from Agenda Number: PU 2005-036 Compudyne Public Safety and Justice, Inc. in the amount of $427,020 - Resolution No. 2005-062 At the March 23, 1998 meeting, Council approved the purchase of the Tiburon Public Safety system, a "turn key" public safety system for both Police and Fire. The system implementation was completed in 1999 and has not been upgraded since that time. The Tiburon system functions as the primary means for the Police and Fire Departments automated dispatch, which provides responders relevant information regarding the incident in which they are responding. It is also used for case and records management, crime analysis, research and reporting. The Tiburon system upgrade was approved by Council in the current Capital Projects Budget. The upgrade will increase system performance for both software and hardware. Additionally, several enhancements to the system will increase productivity both in the field and office. As an example, WebQuery reporting will increase productivity by allowing the Police and Fire Departments instant access to data from any City web browser. The robust functionality of the new reporting system will allow Police and Fire to provide better quality and faster service for citizen requests and will reduce redundant data entry. . Because we are upgrading an existing system and Compudyne is the only vendor we can purchase the upgrade from, this will be a sole source purchase. The Local Government Code states that sole source purchases do not require solicitation of bids or proposals. An internal committee was formed to evaluate the proposed upgrade. The committee consisted of members from the Information Services, Police and Fire departments. The committee was very pleased with the additional functionality and increased performance of the proposed upgrade and is recommending approval. In conjunction with the software upgrade purchase, staff is recommending signing a Master Support Agreement that extends the City's annual software maintenance with Tiburon for the life of the purchase. Software maintenance for Tiburon is budgeted in the Information Services fund annually. The Capital Projects Budget for the Tiburon upgrade is $650,000. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005 - 062. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other . 4 (r/JiUTJ Deoi"rtment Head Sianature .~ '\. '" Sufficient F . D~nø 1 nf 1 . . . RESOLUTION NO. 2005-062 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1 . The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the System Upgrade Implementation Agreement, Master Support Agreement, and Software License Agreement with Compudyne Public Safety and Justice, Inc. for the upgrade of the City's Tiburon Public Safety System. PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of August, 2005. APPROVED: Oscar Trevino Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Spooner, Information Services Director - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Information Services Council Meeting Date: 8/22/2005 Subject: Authorize Purchase of Computer Eauipment for the Public Agenda Number: PU 2005-037 Safety System Upgrade from IBM Corporation in the Amount of $84,566 - Resolution No. 2005-063 At the March 23, 1998 meeting, Council approved the purchase of the Tiburon Public Safety system, a "turn key" public safety system for both Police and Fire. The system implementation was completed in 1999 and has not been upgraded since that time. The Tiburon system functions as the primary means for the Police and Fire Departments automated dispatch, which provides responders relevant information regarding the incident in which they are responding. It is also used for case and records management, crime analysis, research and reporting. The Tiburon system upgrade was approved by Council in the current Capital Projects Budget. Staff requested Compudyne (Tiburon) to submit an upgrade proposal that included the software upgrade and the hardware to support it, two IBM mid-range servers. Additionally, staff requested State of Texas Department of Information Resource (DIR) pricing from IBM Corporation for the hardware to support the Tiburon upgrade. The DIR pricing for hardware provided by IBM is $84,566; $20,500 less than the proposal provided by Compudyne. By participating in the DIR cooperative purchasing program the City is meeting all State competitive bidding requirements for this purchase. The Local Government Code states that purchases made through a cooperative purchasing agreement satisfy any State law that would require the City to solicit competitive bids. Participation in this program will be cost effective to the City as well as save Staff time. Staff recommends purchasing the IBM servers necessary to support the Tiburon Public Safety system upgrade from IBM Corporation. The Capital Projects Budget for the Tiburon upgrade is $650,000. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005 - 063,. Finance Review Budget Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ? 1 // /I, / I ~ F. ~ // - ~ /··~·tv ~--F--. t: , DeDa ent Head Sianature Finance Director Page 1 of L 1, .., · · · RESOLUTION NO. 2005-063' BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a contract with IBM Corporation for the purchase of hardware to support the City's Tiburon Public Safety System upgrade. PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of August, 2005. APPROVED: Oscar Trevino Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ~iC~ Kyle spooneamation Services Director ... -~ . . , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: BudQet & Research Council Meeting Date: 8/22/05 Subject: Conduct Public HearinQ on Proposed 2005-2006 BudQet Agenda Number: GN 2005-084 The budget work session to review the proposed 2005-2006 budget was held July 29-30, 2005. At the work session, City Council reviewed the operating funds budget, the capital project funds budget, and the budgets for the Crime Control & Prevention District and the Park & Recreation Facilities Development Corporation. Subsequent to this session, the changes City Council requested have been included in the 2004-2005 Revised Budget and in the 2005-2006 Proposed Budget. The notice of public hearing was published in the Star Telegram newspaper in accordance with State law and the City's Charter. The public hearing for the 2005-2006 Annual Budget was advertised to be held during the regular 7:00 p.m. City Council meeting, August 22, 2005. At the July 29-30, 2005 budget work session, the Crime Control District Board reviewed the proposed 2005-2006 Crime Control & Prevention District Budget and recommended it to Council in the amount of $4,702,633. The CCD Board will also conduct a public hearing on August 22, 2005, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, and make its formal recommendation on the proposed budget. A Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Board meeting was held on August 15, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. so that the Board could review the operating and capital projects budgets for the Corporation. The Board will conduct a public hearing on these budgets at 6: 15 p.m., August 22, 2005 and then make its formal recommendation to Council on adoption of the 2005-2006 Budget. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds Available Budget Director i ~v '" ~ .(. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS · · · The 2005-2006 Proposed Annual Operating Budgets for all operating funds are as follows: General Fund Transfer to General Fund Reserves Debt Service Fund Utility Fund Golf Course Fund Aquatic Park Fund Promotional Fund Donations Fund Special Investigation Fund Drainage Utility Fund Parks & Recreation Fund Crime Control District $33,133,463 $287,937 8,272,243 21,665,005 2,175,914 3,595,287 233,413 116,090 378,183 711,368 4,286,362 4,702,633 The Proposed Capital Improvements Budget totals $21,328,243. The breakdown between funds is as follows: Street & Sidewalk Projects Drainage Projects Utility Projects Parks & Recreation Projects Aquatic Park Projects Municipal Facility Projects Major Capital Equipment CIP Personnel $5,868,950 2,937,360 1,772,000 4,352,139 1,216,100 1,807,250 2,121,390 1 ,253,054 $21.328.243 Total The 2005-2006 proposed budget is based on continuing the 57¢ tax rate for the thirteenth year. The notice of public hearing has been published in accordance with the City Charter requirements and State law. The proposed budget document was filed with the City Secretary and at the City Library for public viewing on July 25, 2005. Prior to the Budget hearing, Drew Corn, Budget & Research Director, will provide an overview and highlights of the proposed budgets for next year. Recommendation: To open the public hearing and receive public comments for the Proposed 2005-2006 Budgets for both operations and capital projects. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ,); - . . . August 10, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas As fiscal year 2005/2006 approaches, we are pleased to report the City continues to provide quality services to our citizens and customers. The City of North Richland Hills has achieved many accomplishments over the last year, and our service to citizens has once again set the standard for our neighboring communities. Several programs including the Neighborhood Initiative and Keep NRH Beautiful, have also earned statewide and national recognition. We are proud of these accomplishments and will continue in 2005/2006 to provide excellent services, and to successfully implement the goals and objectives set forth by the City Council, with the resources we have available. Preparing the proposed budget for fiscal year 2005/2006 has been challenging. The City continues to be impacted by economic factors beyond our control. We have seen the complete closure of North Hills Mall as preparations are made for its demolition and redevelopment. A few large national retailers have downsized and closed their stores in our community, while competing businesses continue to open in neighboring cities. As a result, the local economy is not experiencing the recovery that we anticipated. Also, at the state level major proposed changes to school finance, property taxes, sales tax and utility franchises continues to cast a cloud of uncertainty over future budget planning. Even with the negative economic forces, North Richland Hills maintains a strong property tax base, healthy reserves, innovative leadership and excellent City services. We are encouraged by several economic development projects that are on the horizon, including City Walk at Calloway Creek and The Venue at Home Town. Also Tax Increment Financing District #2 has generated enough revenue for us to begin the design of the new public library. The design phase has already begun and construction is expected to begin in mid-2006, with an estimated completion in late 2007. The next fiscal year will be tough from a financial perspective and will result in some revisions to our long-term plans, such as waiting on the purchase of some non-emergency vehicles and equipment for one year. However, we are optimistic about the future. Thanks to the visionary leadership of the City Council and their strategic Goals and Objectives, we are confident we can continue to provide award winning programs and excellent services, as well as some new service enhancements, with the limited resources available. Direction: Goals and Values The goals established by the City Council provide a clear vision for the future of North Rich- land Hills and ensure that all members of the orgaoization are working toward the same ~ ~- objectives. The goals are used to establish programs and policy, and also serve as a guide . for developing the City's budget. The current goals were established around six themes: quality of life, safety and security, community development and revitalization, transportation, fiscal responsibility, and positive City image. All plans and projects for the coming year have been evaluated and prioritized based on meeting these goals. This is especially important, given our limited resources and the anticipated decline in sales tax revenue for fiscal year 2005/2006. 1. SAFETY AND SECURITY - The City of North Richland Hills strives to be the safest community in Tarrant County and to be prepared for potential natural and man made disasters. Priority is placed on providing effective Police, Fire and Emergency Medical Services and maintaining quick response times for emergencies. The City will equip public safety employees with the tools they need to be effective, including state of the art public safety communications. The City will also work to improve its Property Protection Classification Rating from the Insurance Service Organization, in an effort to lower property insurance rates for residents and businesses. Efforts will also be made to enhance citizen education of our public safety programs. . 2. PRESERVE POSITIVE CITY IMAGE - The City of North Richland Hills is the City of Choice for families to live, work and play. The City Council is committed to maintaining a positive City image and reputation for being a great community. Priority will be placed on communicating clearly and effectively with the public and focusing on the City's successes through enhanced public information initiatives. The City will also construct new public facilities, including a new library and recreation center, to replace older facilities that have been outgrown. 3. QUALITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND REVITALIZATION - The City Council recognizes that a strong economic environment is essential for the community's long-term health. The City will work to promote local economic growth, retain and attract quality businesses and support business development. A focus will be placed on: completing and implementing the South Grapevine Highway Study and Loop 820 Corridor Study; expediting the re-development of North Hills Mall; and creating a commuter Rail Station Development Plan. The City will also develop a strategy for building out the remaining vacant land in our community, while improving the quality of older neighborhoods and infrastructure. . 4. FINANCIAL STABILITY- The City Council is committed to getting the best value for taxpayer dollars, and to ensure that we have the financial resources available to invest in community priorities. To ensure long-term financial stability efforts will be made to maximize grant funding, restore General Fund cash reserves, continue to pay-as-you go where possible, and to update the City's long-range financial plan. The City strives to maintain the AA bond rating or better and is committed to holding the line on the current property tax rate. 11 ~ - . . . s 5. QUALITY OF LIFE- To ensure that North Richland Hills remains a great City, we will continue providing quality services that support the active lifestyles of our residents. This includes maintaining our Parks & Recreation Programs at the current high level, maintaining the Cultural Arts Program, expanding the Public Art Program, completing construction of the 19-mile hike and bike trail system, and completing and implementing the NRH20 Strategic Master Plan. It will be a priority to continue to improve our highly recognized library and keep our municipal golf course as a favorite for our residents and visitors. The City will also look for ways to develop and maintain a sense of community, and to encourage volunteerism among employees and residents through the continuation of programs such as the Neighborhood Initiative. 6. EFFICIENT EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM - North Richland Hills strives to provide improved traffic flow and mass transit opportunities for our growing community. Focus will be given to local transportation projects, such as the reconstruction and widening of Loop 820, as well as maintaining a leadership role on regional transportation initiatives and regional rail issues. As a supplement to these Goals, the City Council has established a set of core organizational values and assigned a specific meaning to each value to inspire City employees to strive toward excellence in the provision of services to our citizens. These core values are: RESPECT · Treating others in a courteous, fair and equitable manner · Valuing differences: points of view, style · Honoring the organization's chain of command · Acknowledging successes and the contribution of others · Following up with feedback SERVICE · Providing services to our community and others · Solving problems · Helping the customer to understand · Sensitive to the needs and feelings of others · Taking action, providing a timely response PRODUCTIVITY · Producing results, completing projects - on time, at or under budget · Planning work activities to achieve goals · Meeting or exceeding job standards and expectations · Look for ways to be more productive while being cost effective INTEGRITY · Honest communication . Being trustworthy III '\. . . . .I. · Following through on commitments · Acting with high professional, moral, and ethical standards · Supporting the City of North Richland Hills - goals, values and decisions RESPONSIBILITY · Being knowledgeable and skilled in job · Holding each other accountable for actions and results · Being loyal and taking ownership in the City goals, values, services and departmental work program · Taking pride in work · Willingness to take command and initiative when appropriate INNOVATION · Looking for better ways to do job · Willingness to learn · Being open to new ideas, new approaches · Willingness to take reasonable risks · Thinking creatively and evaluating options TEAMWORK · Participating and involving others in team efforts · Listening and understanding other viewpoints · Willingness to cooperate with others and share resources · Fulfilling defined roles and responsibilities · Work and resolve differences and disagreements The Core Values program has been in place for more than three (3) years, and our employees continue to embrace it by exhibiting these values on a daily basis. In addition, the Human Resources Department hosted the second employee recognition banquet this fiscal year, and recognized Wayne Goodman of the Police Department as the second ever Employee of the Year for the City of North Richland Hills. Accomplishments: Accountabilitv to Citizens Employees have worked diligently during the past year to implement strategies necessary to turn the City Council's goals into reality. Following are highlights of the many accomplishments we have achieved: Safety and Security 1. The Police Department successfully completed their goal of keeping response times for priority 1 calls under 6 minutes and Priority 2 calls under 9 minutes. This year the Police Department responded to Priority 1 calls in 5:09 minutes and Priority 2 calls in 7:39 minutes. IV ~ . . . . 2. A total of 31 active Neighborhood Crime Watch Programs are now established in our community and the Community Services Division of the Police Department continues to actively promote Crime Watch and other crime prevention programs and initiatives. 3. The Police Department shared a grant with Tarrant County for Live Scan - an automated inkless fingerprint system valued at $70,000. This system will connect to the Texas Department of Public Safety automated fingerprint identification system in Austin. It will allow the Police Department to more efficiently identify individuals involved in criminal activity in our city. The system should be installed in the detention facility by the end of 2005. 4. The Fire Department responded to 4,160 calls for service, including 3,053 medical calls, with an average response time of 5:01 minutes from October 2004 to June 2005. 5. The Fire Department hired 5 new Firefighter/Paramedics and placed the third frontline ambulance in service as Medic 222. The third ambulance, located at Fire Station No.2, allows the department to better respond to all parts of our growing community. 6. The Fire Department Certified 75 citizens into the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT). The CERT members are ready to assist in times of emergency, and also volunteer many hours on non-emergency projects and special events. 7. Municipal Court Security was enhanced. The solid wood doors at the entrance of the court room were replaced with glass doors which allow the Marshals to see what is happening inside the Courtroom. Security features were added to the Judge's bench and a security camera was added to the safe area where cash is stored. The enhancements were financed with Building Security Fees. Preserve Positive City Image 1. The Neighborhood Initiative Program was honored with an Outstanding Achievement Award from the U.S. Conference of Mayors. This program was also recognized by the Points of Light Foundation for making a positive and lasting difference in the lives of others. 2. Keep NRH Beautiful was presented the Governor's Community Achievement Award for its exemplary overall effort to beautify and improve the community. 3. The City Council selected BRW Architects Inc. to begin design work for the new library located in Home Town NRH. The design process is expected to be complete by mid- 2006, with construction to follow. 4. The Communications Department developed the NRH News & Notes Newsletter. The newsletter is published monthly and distributed as an insert in the utility bills. This is a cost effective way of communicating important information to all households in the community. v ~ . . . A 5. Citicable increased programming with a new monthly program called RecXpress which spotlights NRH recreation programs and features health and fitness tips from our very own experts in the Parks and Recreation Department. 6. The City Secretary's Office completed the re-codification of City ordinances and successfully moved the code of ordinances on-line. Citizens can now easily access the Code of Ordinances 24 hours a day, 7 days a week from the City Website at www.nrhtx.com. 7. The Utility Billing Division added a "Contact Us" option to the City Website to provide customers and residents easier access to discontinue service or contact the City regarding billing questions. Quality Community Development and Revitalization 1. The City issued 283 permits for new single family dwellings from October 2004 through mid-July 2005. This new construction is valued at $55,531,031. 2. A new Economic Development Website was created to further promote the City and attract new development. The site includes a business database, interactive maps and demographic information. Users can access the website at www.nrhupclose.com. 3. Code Enforcement completed a survey and rating of all housing stock in North Richland Hills. The survey allows Code Enforcement to know which houses need improvements and what condition they are in to address future needs. This has helped us improve neighborhoods and raise community standards. 4. The Neighborhood Initiative Program has completed 56 projects so far this fiscal year compared to 33 projects in 2003/2004. 5. Code Enforcement continues its proactive and "less forceful" enforcement, reducing the number of citations issued from 181 in the 2003/2004 fiscal year to 25 citations so far this year. Rather than writing citations, code enforcement officers have been successful in seeking voluntary compliance from residents. Employees offer assistance through the Neighborhood Initiative Program to those who are unable to comply due to financial reasons or other hardships. 6. The City of North Richland Hills is working with the City of Richland Hills to execute the South Grapevine Highway branding and design project, including the renaming of South Grapevine Highway. The project, which is nearing completion, will help stimulate the redevelopment of this older part of our community. 7. The City executed the Loop 820 Corridor Study. The study will soon be complete and will help with planning future land use, improved access and protection of residential neighborhoods, as related to the future widening of Loop 820. VI \ L . Financially Stability 1. The 2004 Comprehensive Annual Financial report received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officer's Association. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting. The award represents the 21st consecutive year North Richland Hills has received this distinguished award. 2. For the 14th year in a row, the City was presented the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Government Finance Officers Association. In addition, the City also received special recognition for the Budget and Research Department's outstanding presentation of capital information. Of the 1,196 cities in Texas eligible to receive the award this year, only 96 Texas cities were awarded the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award and only three cities in the State received the Special Recognition Award. 3. The City realized annual savings of approximately $17,000 from the new credit card transaction processing agreement with Bank of America. 4. The Utility Customer Service and Purchasing Department worked together to upgrade the water meter technology, which resulted in improved efficiency and cost savings. . 5. Utility Customer Service met its meter reading and billing schedule 100% of the time. The department re-sequenced three cycles to aid in insuring that the routes are read timely and efficiently. Customers in the affected routes were notified with a comment on their bill and the City did not receive any complaints. 6. The Parks Department initiated a contract mowing program for parks and other public lands to save funds, lower personnel costs, and maximize resources. 7. The City made significant changes to Group Medical Benefits to help manage health costs to the City. After thorough review and research the City chose United Healthcare to be the medical network and administer all medical claims. A consumer driven health plan was added and has helped manage costs. The plan went into effect on January 1, 2005. While the employee and dependent health insurance premiums did increase, it appears that the City should finish at or below budget by the end of the fiscal year. Quality of Life 1. The Cottonbelt Trail was completed and opened to the public in November 2004. The four-mile trail begins at Browning Drive, follows the Cottonbelt Rail Line, and ends at Precinct Line Road. . VII \ . . . , 2. The City completed construction of Tommy and Sue Brown Park in February 2005. The park includes 2 playgrounds, a pavilion, looped walking trail, horseshoe pits, washer pits and six-hole Frisbee golf course. 3. The City dedicated the new Liberty Park and Veterans Monument in May 2005. This park, which honors our nation's veterans, is the first of its kind in North Richland Hills and Northeast Tarrant County. 4. The City initiated, and will soon complete, the Strategic Master Plan for NRH20. This five (5) year plan will help guide the water park with recommendations for future capital improvements and operational decisions, enabling the park to compete in an ever growing competitive business industry. 5. The City began construction of the Walker's Creek hike and bike trail. This 2.8 mile trail will link with the North Electric Trail and the Cotton Belt Trail. Completion of this project will be in Fall of 2005. 6. The Parks Department began the design of two (2) new neighborhood parks (Little Bear Creek and Goode Place park sites), and the renovation of Norich Park. Construction of these park projects is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2005/2006. 7. The "Night of Holiday Magic" event experienced another successful year with approximately 15,000 people in attendance. 8. The Library introduced high speed wireless network connections, also known as Wi-Fi. This allows visitors to the Library to access the internet with their laptop and handheld computers. 9. The Library achieved the second highest ranking among public libraries in Texas serving populations of 50,000 to 100,000, as measured by Hennen's American Public Library Ratings. This is an improvement over the prior year when the Library ranked No.3. Effective and Efficient Transportation System 1. The Rufe Snow Drive street construction project from Loop 820 to Mid-Cities Blvd was completed and opened to traffic in July 2004. The newly constructed street has improved traffic flow and helped facilitate economic development in that corridor. The Rufe Snow Drive project from Highlawn Terrace to Ridgetop Road should be competed this summer. 2. The Rufe Snow Bridge at Loop 820 was completed in November 2004. The new Bridge features a Texas Turnaround lane to allow drivers to make U-turns without going through the signal light. The bridge not only improves the flow of traffic, but it is also built to accommodate the future expansion of Loop 820. VIII \ . . . 3. The reconstruction of Rufe Snow Drive, from Karen Drive to Glenview, was also completed. This project included the reconstruction of pavement and sidewalks, along with drainage improvements. 4. Improvements on several collector streets have greatly improved our transportation system, including Glenview Drive from Flory to Linda Spurlock Park, and Lola Drive from Scott to Davis. The Bursey Road connection to Davis Boulevard was also completed, along with the stabilization and resurfacing of North Tarrant Parkway from the Keller City Limits to near Smithfield Road. 5. The Public Works Department overlaid nine (9) lane miles of streets with two (2) inches of hot-mix asphalt, slurry sealed almost thirteen (13) lane miles of streets, and crack sealed ten (10) center line miles through the Preventive Street Maintenance Program. 6. The design phase of the Traffic Signal Light Communication System is complete and construction is now underway. Once complete this system will monitor the operation of 39 signal locations throughout the City from the Public Works Service Center. This will eliminate Public Works personnel from having to visit each signal location to update and troubleshoot malfunctions. This list represents just a few of the City's accomplishments throughout the past year. We are fortunate to have a City Council with the vision to plan for the future, and an excellent staff that strives to meet and exceed the expectations of the Council. We believe fiscal year 2004/2005 has been successful despite budget challenges. 200412005 REVISED BUDGET As part of the normal annual budget process, some areas of the 2004/2005 budget require revision from the original adopted level. One of the changes you will notice between the adopted budget and revised budget is the appropriation of fund balance for prior year encumbrances under revenues. This is generally for items that were encumbered in 2003/2004, as approved by Council, but actually purchased, paid for and completed in fiscal year 2004/2005. The most noteworthy budget revisions are explained in the following narrative. General Fund Revised 2004/2005 General Fund revenues have been revised downward from the adopted level by about $466,000, a 1.5% decrease. This decrease is due to some revenues being revised downward, as well as some being revised up. Below is a discussion of the revenue adjustments. In addition, there were appropriations for a legal settlement of $650,000, Insurance Fund reserve payment of $347,250 and prior year encumbrances of $394,734 included in total revenues of $32,289,011. IX ). . . . The largest adjustment to revised revenues is in sales taxes which have been revised down by $358,988. At the time the budget was developed last year, we were confident that the City would be able to achieve the $8.2 million included in the adopted budget. With the loss of several major retailers, we believe it is necessary to revise this revenue downward and project year-end revenues to be $7.8 million, the lowest level in the past six years. Delinquent property tax revenue has been adjusted upward by almost $68,000 due to larger than expected collections of delinquent accounts by the delinquent tax attorneys. Electric franchise fees have been adjusted downward slightly due to a lower usage of electricity during calendar year 2004. The net effect of these adjustments to the taxes category of revenues is a decrease of $311 ,679 or a 1.4°1b reduction. Fines and forfeitures have been revised downward approximately $10,000. This is due mainly to a decrease in court fine and warrant fee collections. Licenses and permits have been revised downward just over $112,000. Several revenues in this category have been adjusted downward, such as curb and drainage inspection fees and plan review and application fees. With the development of the last large tracts of the City these fees will decrease as areas have neighborhood streets construction and site plans approved. However, building inspections fees will continue to remain at current levels because construction of buildings may occur one to two years after the streets have been paved. Several revenues have been adjusted upward such as animal control impoundment fees. Charges for service have been revised down by almost $50,000 due mainly to decreases in recreation fees. Miscellaneous revenue has been revised upward almost $15,000. This adjustment is a combination of decreases in revenues such as the criminal justice grant and increases such as interest income which was revised upward by $116,500. Appropriation of fund balance has increased by $1,044,734. The adjustments to this category are the appropriation for legal settlement of $650,000 and the appropriation of prior year encumbrances of $394,734. As described above this amount is to offset open purchase orders from the prior year for items that were ordered in the prior year but were not received and invoiced until the current year. General Fund expenditures have been revised upward by approximately $528,000, including the proposed service enhancement. In order to adhere to the new bulk mailing standard, the City Secretary's Office must purchase a new postage machine. This is discussed in greater detail in the addressing critical needs section of this letter. Other increases are $650,000 for legal settlement, $394,734 for prior year encumbrances and $50,000 for reserve for capital improvements. These increases are offset by reductions of over $535,000 made in various general fund departments. The reductions were a result of various measures instituted by staff once it became apparent that sales tax revenues were projected below budget estimates. These reductions include but are not limited to vacancies in various departments and savings in equipment purchases. Revised revenues over expenditures for the General Fund are projected to be $77,308. x .. . . . Utility Fund Revised 2004/2005 Utility Fund revenues have been revised up by just over $510,000 or 2.50/0. This includes a $49,000 increase in water sales, a $279,000 increase in sewer sales and an almost $100,000 increase in late charges. There is a decrease in water inspection fees and sewer inspection fees between adopted and revised. In addition, appropriations of $192,673 in fund balance are for prior year encumbrances. Utility Fund expenditures were increased overall by approximately $703,000. This increase was to the reserve for capital projects. Golf Course Revised 2004/2005 Revenues at the golf course decreased by almost $13,000. The majority of the decrease is in green fees, driving range and cart revenues. This is due to the declining condition of the greens and the competition of newer area public and private golf courses. Revised total expenditures, including reserves and internal debt payments, increased by just over $6,000. AQuatic Park Revised 2004/2005 The original estimate for attendance for fiscal year 2004/2005 was 282,519. The latest estimates lower that number to 226,326. The result of the decrease in attendance is a decrease in revenues of approximately $391,000. Estimated year end revenues for the Park are $3,442,291 including appropriations for previous year encumbrances. Revised expenditures have been reduced by $295,000 to offset the loss of revenue. Reductions have been made to the various operating departments in the Park. There is also a reduction to the insurance reserve due to paying out a claim this year that was approved by Council. Buildina Services Fund Revised 2004/2005 Revised revenues are projected to be over $137,000 more than adopted. This is due to an increase in interest income and an appropriation of fund balance for prior year encumbrances of $118,023. Revised expenditures are $1,868,504 including encumbrances from the previous year of $118,023 and an increase of $44,000 in electricity costs. Equipment Services Fund Revised 2004/2005 Revised revenues are estimated to be $2,427,709, a 4.7% decrease from adopted. The decrease is attributable to a reduction in transfers from the General Fund as result of savings from equipment purchases. Revised expenditures are $2,427,709 which is $113,000 lower than adopted due to the previously mentioned savings from equipment purchases. Xl · · · Self Insurance Fund Revised 2004/2005 Total revenues for this fund are projected to be $6,889,500 slightly less than the adopted budget due to decreases in interest income. Included in total expenditures of $6,889,500 are health/medical costs of $5.1 million, $699,314 for all other insurance, $447,914 in personnel expenses and $591 ,846 in reserves for future insurance claims. Information Services Fund Revised 2004/2005 Total revised revenue is projected to be $2,400,813. This includes an appropriation of fund balance of $153,804 for prior year encumbrances and a decrease in transfers from various funds in the amount of $117,234 for computer services. Total revised expenditures increased just under $40,000. This increase includes prior year encumbrances of $153,804 offset by decreases in computer hardware and software purchases totaling almost $110,000. Promotional Fund Revised 2004/2005 Occupancy tax revenues are expected to continue to decline and to be $35,100 less than adopted at $174,900. Interest income has been revised to $3,700, an increase of $1,700. Also included in total revenues of $262,423 is an appropriation of fund balance for $82,723. This is $33,900 more than in the adopted budget. The increase in the appropriation is needed in order to offset the decrease in occupancy tax revenues. Also included is $1,000 for prior year encumbrances. Total expenditures are projected to be $262,423. Donations Fund Revised 2004/2005 Overall revenues are projected to increase $43,501 over adopted and includes an appropriation for previous year encumbrances of $7,810. The increase also includes amounts raised through fund raising efforts for the veterans' monument at Liberty Park. Total revised expenditures of $202,301 are $15,515 more than the adopted budget. The increase expenditures are $7,810 for previous year encumbrances and the remainder for additional costs associated with the veterans' monument. The Donations Fund is projected to end the year with an $110,946 balance of revenues over expenditures. Speciallnvesti~ation Fund Revised 2004/2005 Revised revenues have been adjusted upward by about $73,000. State and Federal forfeited funds have increased by over $25,000. Forfeited funds revenues are dependent on which cases go to court and whether or not a judge releases any funds to the City. This revenue fluctuates year to year. The radio system revenue has been increased by just over $45,000. This brings the revenues more in line with what it looks like we will collect from other cities who participate with us for radio maintenance. Revised expenditures remain at the adopted level excluding previous year encumbrances. This fund is projected to end the year with $72,039 in revenues over expenditures. XII ... . . . Drainage Utilitv Fund Revised 2004/2005 Drainage fee revenue has increase by $18,000 over adopted bringing the revised revenues to $795,700. It is projected that this fund will end the year with a balance of approximately $336,165. Parks Development Fund Revised 2004/2005 Sales tax revenue projections were revised downward by approximately $139,000 and Tennis Center revenues have been revised downward to $292,250, a 120/0 decrease under adopted. Interest income has been revised upward by almost $35,000 and there is an appropriation of fund balance for previous year encumbrances of $19,090. Total revenues of $4,359,058 are $120,247 less than the adopted budget. Total expenditures of $4,359,058 includes a reduction of over $150,000 of adopted reserve for capital projects and an appropriation of fund balance of $19,090 for previous year encumbrances. Crime Control and Prevention District Revised 2004/2005 Sales tax revenue projections were revised downward by approximately $119,000 for total revised revenues of $4,702,562. Due to the cyclical nature of officer candidate availability and lower than normal response to recruiting efforts, over $185,000 in salary savings was identified due to vacancies. This decrease in expenditures allowed for the planned use of transition fund reserves to be decreased by $82,236. Total revised expenditures of $4,702,562 are $190,450 less than adopted. 2005/2006 PROPOSED BUDGET Highlights and Analysis In an effort to achieve the goals set by the City Council, continuation of initiatives from previous years are planned for 2005/2006. Highlights of the coming year are: 1. Continuina Support for Preventive Street Maintenance - The 15th consecutive year of major funding for preventive street maintenance will see the continuation of $600,000 devoted to this highly visible program. Prior to 2003/2004, this program was funded completely by the General Fund. In 2003/2004, due to budgetary constraints, the Preventive Street Maintenance program was funded wholly in the capital projects program using savings from projects in previous years. In 2004/2005, $300,000 of the funding came from the General Fund, with the balance of $300,000 being funded with an accumulation of savings from past projects in the capital projects program. In 2005/2006, $400,000 of proposed funding will come from the General Fund, with the balance of $200,000 being funded with past project savings. Citizens can expect to see continued improvement in the overall condition of streets in North Richland Hills over the next few years. XIII ... . . . 2. Equipment & Buildina Services Plans - Staff continues to update these plans originally presented to City Council in fiscal year 1997/1998. The plans allow the City to continue its programs of facility infrastructure maintenance and equipment replacements with no property tax increase, while monitoring the investment the City has in these valuable assets. As commented on in the "Maintaining a Sound Budget: Evaluating Services and Expenditures" section of this letter, suggested changes are being made for next fiscal year as far as specific equipment and building upgrades, but the basic plan remains valid and is recommended to be continued as a tool to keep our equipment and buildings timely and reasonably maintained, replaced and/or improved. The 2006 plans are presented in the 2005/2006 Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). 3. Aquatic Park Infrastructure - The 10th consecutive year of infrastructure funding will see $325,000 added to reserves for major infrastructure replacement and/or major repair. Total accumulated reserves at the end of fiscal year 2006 are estimated to be approximately $2.4 million. 4. Support of Alliance for Child Advocacv Center - This program will receive $16,590 in fiscal year 2005/2006 with funding from the Crime Control and Prevention District sales tax. This program reaches out with assistance to at-risk children in Northeast Tarrant County. 5. 7th Year Reserve for Capital Improvements - The 2005/2006 budget continues funding the reserve for capital projects to provide a pay-as-you-go approach to fund small capital projects. The total 2005/2006 requested funding to add to this reserve is $100,000. Projects funded from this small reserve allow us to avoid borrowing funds for smaller capital projects. This will bring the total amount transferred to the reserve to over $3.0 million since the reserve was created in FY 1998/1999. 6. Restoration of General Fund Reserves - As part of the approved insurance reserve policy ($347,250 in 2004/2005 and $103,800 in 2005/2006) and the approved legal settlement ($650,000 in both 2004/2005 and 2005/2006), it has been necessary to appropriate fund balance or draw-down cash reserves from the General Fund. In the 2005/2006 proposed budget $287,937 will be added to fund balance to begin the restoration of these reserves. 7. Service Enhancement for 2005/2006 - Service enhancements to address Goals established by City Council are included in the 2005/2006 proposed budget. Management and staff identified items that met critical needs or were mandated by state law. These enhancements are discussed in detail later in this letter. The following is a brief list of what is included in these enhancements: ~ Walk-in Freezer Expansion - Animal Shelter - $9,397 ~ Professional Services for ISO Rating - $8,800 ~ School Crossing Guard - New School - $6,061 ~ Mandated Cost - 2003 International Building Code - $5,700 XIV ~ . While the 2005/2006 proposed budget addresses many of the Goals Council has established for the City, the proposed budget strives to further enhance or improve existing services without incurring added costs, but this has been a challenge because of limited resources. Property Values & Tax Analvsis Net taxable value growth is up once again. As of the July 2005 tax roll, net taxable values are approximately 5.50/0 greater than last July and include $80,253,195 in new construction. Excluding new construction, existing property increased in value 2.9% over July 2004. The average home value in North Richland Hills was $132,004 in May 2004. The average home value, based on the July 2005 tax roll, is $134,909. The estimated revenue to be generated from the net taxable value at a 990/0 collection rate is $18,695,317. The proposed budget includes revenues to the Debt Service Fund in the amount of $6,679,223 to pay for bonds and certificates of obligation, $683,092 for public improvements in the Tax Increment Financing Districts, and $11,233,002 to the General Fund. The proposed budget includes no changes to the current tax rate of 57¢ per $100 valuation, which is approximately equal to the estimated effective tax rate of 57¢. The effective tax rate will be confirmed with Tarrant County. General Fund Proposed 2005/2006 . The General Fund provides funding for the tax supported operations of the City. These are services traditionally referred to as City operations such as Police, Fire, Streets, Library, etc. The major sources of revenue to this fund are sales taxes (representing 24% of General Fund revenues) and property taxes (representing 34% of General Fund revenues), both excluding appropriations of fund balance. In 2005/2006, total revenues in the General Fund are projected to increase over 2004/2005 adopted revenues by approximately $1,066,000, a 3.30/0 increase. (The appropriation from fund balance is a legal settlement and one time revenue source and somewhat skews the actual revenue increase picture. When this is eliminated, the estimated revenue increase is $416,445 or 1.3%.) The major increases are: ~ Property taxes $ 1,049,989 ~ Fines and Forfeitures $ 97,393 ~ Charges for Services $ 49,191 ~ Interest Earnings $ 201,500 ~ Appropriation from Fund Balance - Legal $ 650,000 ~ Juvenile Case Manager Fees $ 63,000 (Effective September 1, 2005, municipalities will be allowed to charge a fee to recover costs associated with juvenile case manager activities in Municipal Court. North Richland Hills has an existing program and upon approval from Council will begin assessing this fee. ) As stated in the previous section regarding property values, tax revenues are projected at . $18,695,317 based on the current S7¢ tax rate. Of this amount, $6,679,223 is needed for xv · · · .. debt service and $683,092 is needed for public improvements in the Tax Increment Financing districts. General Fund sales taxes are projected at $7,722,225 (a decrease of 6% below 2004/2005 adopted budget), which includes business gains as well as business losses. This is less revenue than was collected seven years ago in 1998/1999 and 1 .60/0 less than current year revised. Initially in the General Fund, departmental budget requests totaled $33,497,527. The proposed General Fund departmental budgets total $32,157,111, only a 1.000/0 increase over the adopted 2004/2005 budget, and over $1.3 million less than departmental requests. Careful evaluation was made in reducing these funding requests without diminishing service delivery. Additionally, amounts budgeted for the capital projects reserve, lump sum merit, allocation to the Self Insurance medical claims reserve, and proposed service enhancements bring the total proposed General Fund budget to $33,133,463. Overall departmental expenditures increased by only 1.00% over adopted FY 2004/2005. The proposed budget includes an average 40/0 merit increase for eligible employees with corresponding increases to benefits and increases to health insurance and workers compensation. Allocations to Information Service, Building Service and Equipment Service funds were all reduced due to decreased costs in each of these internal service funds. The net decrease in allocations to internal service funds was over $575,000. The decrease will be discussed in detail later in the internal service fund section of this letter. There are other increases and decreases to note specific to departments. It is being proposed that the Economic Development Department begin budgeting the salaries of staff currently funded by the Promotional Fund. This plan suggests to move 0.25 full-time equivalent salaries to the General Fund each year until all economic development staff are funded in the General Fund. Proposed 2005/2006 expenditures in the General Fund are projected to increase by $21,171 bringing the total for Economic Development to $121,958. The proposed Neighborhood Services budget increased over last year's adopted by about $55,000. This increase is the result of over $10,000 to replace the walk-in freezer, $2,000 to repair the crematorium at the Animal Shelter and moving the substandard demolition costs of $13,500 from Building Inspections section of the budget to the Code Enforcement section of the budget. The remaining increases were for merit pay and associated costs. Inspections, now part of the new Planning and Development Department, had a decrease of the $13,500 due to moving substandard demolition to Neighborhood Services but this is offset by the increased salary costs as a result of the departmental restructuring and merit pay and associated costs. The proposed budget total for this new department is $905,257, an increase of $27,035 from last year. In the Fire Department, staffing a third front-line ambulance was included in the adopted FY 2004/05 and was to be funded beginning May of that fiscal year. The proposed budget includes an increase of approximately $245,000 to staff the third ambulance for a full year. XVI . . The proposed budget total for the Fire Department is $8,245,781, an increase of $354,988. . The remaining increase is due in part to merit pay and associated costs. The proposed budget includes $100,000 in reserve for "pay as you go" Capital Improvements. This is $450,000 less than the funding goal of $550,000 due to budget constraints. In future years it is anticipated, revenues permitting, to increase funding for this reserve back to $550,000. The proposed budget also includes a $103,880 allocation to the Self Insurance Fund to continue the rebuilding of medical claims reserves in that fund as approved by Council. Funding is from Fund Balance and is identified as an appropriation from Fund Balance in the revenues and in expenditures as a transfer to the Self Insurance Fund. This is a decrease of $243,450 from adopted FY 2004/2005 per the approved reserve plan. There are several proposed cost savings measures discussed in the "Maintaining a Sound Budget: Evaluating Services and Expenditures" section of this letter. But, for 2005/2006, the City will continue to deliver Quality services as in past years. The projected revenues over expenditures for the General Fund are $362,524, including a few service enhancements, but $287,937 will be set aside to restore General Fund reserves. Utilitv Fund Proposed 2005/2006 . Water sales and charges generated from the North Richland Hills system for 2005/2006 are projected to be $13,103,796, a 4.4% increase from current year adopted budget. Most of the increase is due to the rate increases recommended in the recently conducted utility rate study. Sewer sales and charges are projected to be $7,745,444, about $515,000 more than current year adopted. As with water service, most of the increase is due to the rate increases recommended in the recently conducted utility rate study as mentioned above. Included in total Utility Fund revenues are appropriations of $237,165 in fund balance for rate stabilization which is discussed further in the financing section of this letter. There is also an appropriation of $34,600 in fund balance to the Self Insurance Fund to be used toward rebuilding medical claims reserves in that fund per the approved reserve plan. Total Utility Fund revenues are projected to be $21,665,005, about $1,395,000 more than the 2004/2005 adopted budget. Expenses are estimated at $21,665,005 which is a 6.9 % increase over 2004/2005 adopted. Included in the budget is approximately $500,000 in water and sewer treatment costs charged by the City of Fort Worth and the Trinity River Authority. A projected increase to the reserve for capital projects of $782,147. These reserves will fund the various water and sewer systems improvement and expansions as identified in the long range utility capital improvement plan. Also included in total expenditures is a transfer of $34,600 to the Self Insurance Fund. The increase to the Self Insurance Fund is needed to help with reestablishing the medical claims reserve and is per the refunding plan approved by Council. . XVII -I . Golf Course Pro~osed 2005/2006 The Golf Course is projecting net revenues of $2,175,914 a decrease of about $50,000. Actual operating revenues will decrease by over $600,000 due to closure of the course for six weeks for the reconstruction of greens which is included in the proposed Capital Improvements Budget. Park Development sales tax revenues (4B) in the amount of $550,000 will fund $100,000 for the greens reconstruction project, $150,000 for intensive care and maintenance of the greens before, during and after reconstruction and $300,000 for debt service during the time of closure. Operating expenses were lowered by approximately $100,000 to reflect expenses that can be avoided during the reconstruction project. Expenses including debt service, inter-fund loan payments and reserves totaled $2,175,914. Aauatic Park Proposed 2005/2006 Revenues of $3,595,287 at NRH20 are $142,433 less than the 2004/2005 adopted budget. It is estimated that there will be 241 ,456 visitors to the park next year. Expenditures are projected to be $3,595,287. Included in expenditures is $390,873 for debt service, and the final installment of $50,000 to repay a loan from the infrastructure reserve in the amount of $100,000. The loan was repaid from revenues generated from locker rentals. The reserves for future infrastructure continue to be budgeted at $325,000. The reserve for future park expansion is budgeted at $74,997. . Buildina Services Fund Proposed 2005/2006 The total proposed budget of $1,835,881 includes operating expenses of $1,650,608, capital expenses of $134,750, and debt service payments of $42,309. These costs are to provide maintenance and repairs to all City facilities. This is an increase of 6.1 % from the 2004/2005 adopted budget. The cost of electricity is projected to increase $160,000 over current adopted budget. The ten-year plan approved by City Council in 1997 has been updated to for 2006 and is included in the proposed 2005/2006 CIP budget. Actual capital projects have been reprioritized as previously commented on to allow adjustments to the General Fund, but the Building Services Plan is to be continued as scheduled in the future years. Eauipment Services Fund Proposed 2005/2006 . Total proposed expenses of $2,061,240 include operations and maintenance of $1,509,979, equipment purchases of $341 ,945, and debt service payments of $98,353. Included in equipment purchases are 6 police vehicles. This fund maintains operating and major equipment used in all City departments. This year it will be necessary to finance $1,418,290 in replacement vehicles including a $901,900 aerial ladder truck and a $205,390 ambulance. The debt service increase will not occur until FY 2006/2007. These large pieces of equipment are included in the proposed capital improvement project budget. The ten-year plan approved by City Council in 1997 has been updated for 2006 with future debt service and is included in the proposed 2005/2006 CIP budget. Each department pays its pro-rata cost for operations and maintenance of equipment users. Revenues for the proposed budget XVIII . . . are $2,061,240 with $1,849,666 being charges for service to customer departments. As previously mentioned in the letter, equipment replacements of non-emergency equipment was reprioritized but will be provided for in future years. XIX . . . . Self Insurance Fund Proposed 2005/2006 The Self-Insurance Fund pays for City wide expenses related to major medical coverage for employees, workers compensation coverage, property and general liability coverage, life insurance and all administrative expenses associated with this program. The Self Insurance Fund budget for 2005/2006 meets all expected expenses. The budget for health/medical is $507,536 more than 2004/2005 adopted, a 10% increase. The increase in health/medical has been kept to a smaller increase than in recent years as a result of recent plan changes implemented in January 2005. The insurance fund reserves are being rebuilt per the reserve plan with the employees and the City sharing this cost. Overall the proposed 2005/2006 Self-Insurance Fund will see a 2.22% increase in expenditures for all insurance purposes from the current adopted budget. Information Services Fund Proposed 2005/2006 The Information Services Fund pays City wide expenses associated with major computers, microcomputers, data network, Geographical Information System, and telecommunications services. Departments pay their pro-rata share of the computer and telecommunications services. The Information Services budget totals $2,148,197 which is a 10.00/0 decrease from the fiscal year 2004/2005 adopted budget. Staff has decreased operational expenditures by over $130,000 from the previous year by focusing on only the most critical projects and needs of the customer departments. Additionally, due to budget constraints, reserve funding will be $56,461, a decrease of approximately $78,000 from 2004/2005 adopted. These reductions result in a decrease in service charges to departments of about $217,000. Promotional Fund Proposed 2005/2006 The Promotional Fund, which provides visitor/tourism services and economic development for the City, projects occupancy tax proceeds of $174,900, interest income in the amount of $2,275 and an appropriation of fund balance of $56,138 necessary to cover costs. This fund continues to see very little growth due to occupancy levels at our local hotels. We do not expect any improvement in this over the foreseeable future. Therefore, it is proposed to transition funding salaries for employees currently funded in this fund to the General Fund to begin this year. The proposed plan will move 0.25 full-time equivalent salaries each year until all salaries are transitioned out of the Promotional Fund. Total proposed expenditures for the Promotional Fund are projected at $233,143 a 10.70/0 decrease from current year adopted. Donations Fund Proposed 2005/2006 The Donations Fund derives most of its revenue from contributions made through city water bills. The contributions are allocated to the Library (60¢), Humane Services (60¢), and special events and arts (30¢). It is estimated that water bill donation revenues will generate approximately $126,000 of the total projected revenues of $190,980 for 2005/2006. Total revenues are about $78,766 less than 2004/2005 adopted. The decrease is primarily due to the appropriation of fund balance for the Humane Services expansion project ($60,000) and xx Library Materials ($10,000) not occurring in the 2005/2006 proposed budget. It is projected . that the fund will have revenues in excess of expenditures of $74,890. Speciallnvestiaation Fund Proposed 2005/2006 Revenues for this fund are derived from Federal and State forfeited funds and reimbursements from neighboring cities involved in the Police Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) program, the 800 MHz radio system and the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) program. Total revenues are budgeted at $410,332, which is slightly more than current year adopted. Proposed expenditures total $378,183 a decrease over current year adopted of $11 ,465. MDT Maintenance cost increases of $41 ,000 were offset by the last loan payment in the current year of $52,665. Revenues are projected to exceed expenditures by $32,149. . . Drainaae Utilitv Fund Proposed 2005/2006 This Fund accounts for the monthly fees charged to residents and businesses to pay for the cost of drainage improvements throughout the City. Revenues are transferred to the Debt Service Fund to pay for principal and interest on bonds approved by voters for drainage improvements. Budgeted debt service transfers for 2005/2006 are $711,368. An ending balance of $419,432 is projected for this fund. Parks Development Fund Proposed 2005/2006 Sales tax revenues are projected to be around $3.86 million in 2005/2006, approximately $200,000 or 5.2% less than the 2004/2005 adopted budget. Total budgeted expenditures are approximately $4.29 million, including debt service of $1 ,208,248, and reserves for capital projects of $314, 187. Also included is the allocation of sales tax revenues to be used to enhance our economic development efforts. The first year allocation to economic development in 2004/2005 was $250,000. Subsequent years the allocations to economic development are to be 5% of sales tax revenues or $193,056 for the 2005/2006 proposed budget. The Tennis Center continues to be active and generate about $310,000 in revenues, but is estimated to cost $491,000 to operate. This Fund also provides funding for park operations, administration and for maintenance of park and recreation facilities constructed using the half-cent sales tax. No additional personnel are requested for our parks as Council approved a contract mowing program, and it is now underway and will be evaluated throughout this next year. Capital Projects funded through this fund are identified in the proposed CIP Budget. Crime Control District Proposed 2005/2006 Sales tax revenues are projected to be just over $3.7 million in the Crime Control District for 2005/2006. This is $178,477 less than the 2004/2005 adopted budget. A loan of $957,972 from the transition fund is necessary to cover the decreasing sales tax revenues. Proposed expenditures for 2005/2006 are $4.7 million a decrease from 2004/2005 adopted of $190,000. The decreases in expenditures include a reduction in transfers to Equipment XXI . . . .. Services of $75,000, a reduction in transfer to the General Fund of $156,562 and last loan payment for the Special Investigations Fund. These decreases were offset by increases in insurance costs and the proposed lump sum merit pay. Maintainina a Sound Budaet: Evaluatina Services and Expenditures The sluggish economy, combined with the complete closing of North Hills Mall and continued decline in sales tax, made it necessary to make adjustments to the 2004/2005 Adopted Budget to compensate for lower than expected revenues. In order to prepare a balanced budget for fiscal year 2005/2006, Department Directors and City Management further identified areas where we can reprioritize projects and reduce expenditures. It is important to note that these will be temporary changes and will not affect services. We anticipate that once we return to better financial conditions these projects will resume to help us carry out our long-term plans. We believe that with these proposed changes the City can still provide excellent City services and continue the implementation of the Council Goals and Objectives. However, it will be difficult to further reduce expenditures without negatively impacting critical services. The following provides a summary of the recommended expenditure reductions. Equipment Replacement As part of our long-range plans we have 10-year schedules for equipment replacements. Equipment includes public safety vehicles, pick up trucks for various departments, vans, dump trucks, large mowers, and other items that are used in the day to day operations of the City. In order to ensure a balanced budget and maintain consistent services, we have reevaluated the schedule of equipment replacement and recommend some changes. This includes postponing the replacement of a 1993 Chevrolet Astro Van, four Chevrolet C1500 trucks, two large mowers, and a 1994 Chevrolet Lumina. The vehicles will continue to be maintained and in good operating condition for another year. The large mowers will be put on hold until we have better experience to gauge whether the contract mowing of parks is effective. If the City chooses to continue the contract mowing these mowers might not be needed in the future. It is important to note that these delays will not compromise any public safety operations. By postponing these non-emergency equipment replacements for one year, we are able to reduce the budget by $258,360. Building Equipment and Maintenance Projects As part of our long-range plans we have a 10-year schedule for building equipment replacement, renovation, and major maintenance projects. The City has reevaluated the schedule and identified savings by postponing some of these planned projects for one year. This includes Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems (HVAC) Replacements at City Hall, the Bursey Road Senior Center, CitiCable, Library, and the Police Department Jail Control. The HV AC systems have been well maintained and are in good enough condition to remain in place for another year. Other projects include minor renovations and maintenance. By putting off these non-critical projects for one year the City will save $197,550 which will help to balance the budget. XXII . . . . ,. Technology Replacements and ' Upgrades The City is committed to being at the forefront of technology. As a result, City Staff is constantly identifying ways to upgrade our current technology as well as examining some future technology needs. Similar to our building and equipment replacements, we have a schedule to replace and upgrade our technology. This too had to be reprioritized and it was necessary to hold off on the replacement and upgrade of some our technology. This includes a wireless network study, replacement of our computer network hardware, the purchase of software to expand our Geographic Information System (GIS) capabilities, and the GIS data conversion services for utility systems. Although these projects would benefit City operations, they are not deemed detrimental if we hold on them for a short time. Postponing them for one year will save the City $121,645 this next fiscal year. Preventive, Street Maintenance Program The Preventive Street Maintenance Program has been operating on an annual budget of $600,000. The program's objective is to extend the life of the current street system and delay more costly street reconstruction. In an effort to reduce costs to the General Fund, it is suggested that $200,000 in savings from other street projects and interest earnings be put toward the Preventive Street Maintenance Program in 2005/2006. This will allow us to contribute only $400,000 from the General Fund and still provide full funding of $600,000 for the Preventive Street Maintenance Program. As a result the City will realize a savings of $200,000 and still be able to fully fund the program so it will not be reduced in scope this coming fiscal year. "Pay as You Go" Capital. Projects Reserve For several years the City Council has tried to annually put $550,000 into a Capital Projects Reserve, commonly referred to as the "Pay as You Go Reserve," to fund small capital projects from cash and avoid debt financing on smaller projects where possible. At the beginning of the budget preparation process, we attempted to budget $550,000 to add to this reserve, but it is necessary to reduce this to $100,000 thereby saving $450,000. It would be desirable to return to fully funding the pay as you in future years to enable the City to pay cash for smaller capital improvements and save interest expenses. However, this is a good option for us at this time to reduce the contribution to the reserve fund. Our primary objective has been to reduce costs and balance the budget without adversely affecting core and public safety services. The recommended cost savings have been carefully weighed against the impact they will have on our citizens. We believe these temporary adjustments will not impact services during the next fiscal year. Our plan is to resume with these projects once the local economy improves. In summary, we feel the proposed reductions balance the budget while keeping critical services in tact. XXIII . . . Addressina Critical Needs: Plannina for the Future & Providina Necessarvlm~rovements Although North Richland Hills continues to face challenging economic times, the City is experiencing steady population growth and increased demands on services. To continue providing excellent services, staff is recommending enhancements to some City programs and services. Some of the proposed enhancements are mandated, while others are deemed critical by staff. All are in line with the City Council's Goals and Objectives. Funds for these improvements have been identified through planning and the reprioritization of projects. The following descriptions provide details of the proposed service enhancements. Revised 2004/2005 PostaaeMachine'Replacement - Mandated Cost The United States Postal Service has mandated the retirement of all meters using letterpress technology by January 1, 2006. According to the mandate, the city's postal system will have to be replaced with a system that uses digital printing technology. City staff has identified the Mailing System DM 1000 Series with a Power Stacker to purchase from Pitney Bowes, a well respected postal support services company. This mailing system is a 30lb scale and includes a printer with digital printing capabilities. The system will allow all certified mail to be tracked by a bar code, similar to those in a grocery store, as required by the Department of Homeland Security. The digital printing technology will also allow us to print much faster and speed up our mailing operations. The total cost to purchase the machine will be $31,000. An additional $5,000 will be needed to do some basic remodeling to accommodate the equipment. The budget will also include an $831 annual maintenance agreement. The total cost of replacing the postage machine is $36,831. Proposed. ,2005/2006 ImplementinathelnternationalBuildina Code - Mandated Cost During this fiscal year the State Legislature passed Senate Bill 1458. This bill approves The 2003 International Building Code (IBC) as the municipal building code for Texas commercial and multi-family construction. The bill goes into effect in September 2005, but Cities have until January 1, 2006 to implement the new code system. In the meantime, the Inspections staff must purchase the new code books and receive training on the new code. The total cost for compliance is $5,700. The cost includes $1,200 for training the Inspections Department staff and $4,500 for the updated code books. ProfessionalServicesforPrODertv Protection Classification Ratina The City has invested significantly in its fire protection capabilities over the past several years. These improvements include: the addition of a third front line ambulance; the addition of several firefighters for the aerial ladder truck; Automatic Aid agreements with our neighboring cities, the enhancement of our firefighting training; the improvement of water system for firefightin9 through the addition of more fire XXIV . hydrants and water mains; and the improvement of response times through the relocation of Fire Stations 1 and 4. Because of these improvements we believe we can improve the City's Property Protection Classification (PPC) to a more favorable rating, which will result in lower fire insurance rates for homeowners and small businesses. The Property Protection Classification (PPC) grading is assigned to cities by the Insurance Services Office (ISO). The ISO looks at all aspects of a community's fire protection including water supply (fire flow), water distribution, number of hydrants, and number and location of engines (pumpers) and fire trucks (aerial ladders). The Texas Addendum also allows cities in our state to gain extra credits for fire prevention efforts like school fire drills, fire safety education programs and adopting current fire and building codes. The PPC rating is based on a scale of "10" with "1" being the best and a "10" being no fire protection available. The City of North Richland Hills currently carries a PPC of "4". With the recent improvements made by the Fire Department, we believe that our rating can improve from "4" to a "2." Should we achieve this goal, homeowners would be able to receive a 100/0 reduction in their home's fire insurance premiums. . The reclassification project will involve three phases. The first phase includes hiring a consultant to conduct a mock grading exercise and create a list of additional improvements that are recommended. The second phase is preparing an ISO pre- survey packet with all the information needed for the ISO Field representative and the third phase is to assist the ISO Field Representative during their actual survey of the City. The total cost is estimated to be $17,400. Phase I has already begun and will be complete during the 2004/2005 fiscal year. Phase II and Phase III will be completed during the 2005/2006 fiscal year. We are proposing $8,800 for FY 2005/2006 to cover the cost of Phase II and Phase III. There have been recent discussions at ISO about eliminating the Texas Addendum and the extra grading points associated with that document. We believe it would be beneficial for the City of North Richland Hills to request a PPC reclassification visit before this occurs. This project contributes to accomplishing the City Council Goal of Safety and Security. Additional SchoolCrossinaGuard - New School The new Walker Creek Elementary School is scheduled to open for the 2005/2006 school year and will require the addition of a school crossing guard. If the City does not fill this position, children attending the school may have to cross streets unprotected, increasing the potential for auto pedestrian accidents. Failing to fill the position would also increase need for Public Service Officers or Police Officers at the school to ensure the safety of the children because there are currently not enough school crossing guards available to take away from other schools. The total cost to fund this position is $6,061. This program addresses the safety needs of the children and residents around Walker Creek Elementary and also contributes to accomplishing the City Council Goal Safety and Security. . xxv . . . Walk-in Freezer Expansion - Animal ,Shelter The Proposed Budget includes replacing the walk-in freezer at the Animal Shelter. The daily operations of the Animal Shelter require the storage of deceased animals prior to disposal, as well as the storage of donated animal food. Storing donated food in a zero degree environment prolongs the shelf-life of the food and eliminates the pest control problems inherent to dry storage of these items. The current freezer is inadequate in size and is experiencing frequent repairs to cool properly. In addition the floor is in need of replacement and the walls are in need of repair. With an ever growing animal population, the burden for this storage has also increased. The cost of replacing the freezer with a like size freezer is $10,603 and funds are included in the Neighborhood Services line item for this in the proposed 2005/2006 budget. Staff is recommending an additional $9,397 be allocated to allow the purchase of the needed larger unit, which would be approximately 1 ,300 cubic feet. The replacement of the walk-in freezer will enhance the Animal Shelter's operations by increasing the freezer's capacity and reducing repair costs. Retainina Qualitv Emplovees North Richland Hills' most valuable assets are its employees. Our employees are the reasons we achieve excellence in delivery of services including police and fire protection, street maintenance, water and utility services, recreation services, and park maintenance, just to name a few. Our employees are also critical in making sure the City Council's Goals and Objectives are achieved. North Richland Hills has a history of hiring and retaining skilled, educated and experienced employees. By continuing to offer a quality compensation and benefits program, we will further attract and retain exemplary employees. To continue providing competitive benefits and compensation with limited resources, we are implementing strategies to address rising medical costs and ensure that the Self-Insurance Fund remains sound, as well as providing for the continuation of the Merit Pay System established by the City Council. An update of these efforts is provided below. Health Plan Historv and Plan Year 2006 In July 2003, City Council and staff met in a special work session to discuss significant challenges facing the City's self-insured health plan. Years of double-digit medical inflation and several large catastrophic medical claims had put a strain on the City's Self Insurance Fund. At that time, a three-year strategy of cost sharing and cost reduction was approved to slow the growth of the City's health insurance costs. It was important for employees and the City to partner to ensure the long-term success of the cost saving initiatives. Since that time, many changes to the plan design and administration have occurred and it is apparent that the difficult decisions made over the last two years are working as intended. Effective January of this year United Healthcare became the City's health plan administrator. The transition from the previous vendors to United Healthcare went extremely well and United Healthcare is performing as expected. Also in January, employee medical and dental premiums increased across the board for all plans and the City added, as a third option, a XXVI . . . consumer driven health plan called the I-Plan. Last year Council approved a 6-year strategy for rebuilding the health insurance reserves. This first year, a budget transfer was made to the Self-Insurance Fund from the General and Utilities Funds and beginning in 2006 both the City and employees will contribute to rebuilding reserves. In August 2004, the City held its first ever employee and retiree health fair at the City's Recreation Center. The health fair was a great success with 13 vendors and approximately 170 employees, retirees, and family members who participated. North Hills Hospital provided blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose screening free of charge to all participants. Through June of this year, claim costs are tracking slightly over budget, but based on past claims experience we anticipate coming in at budget or slightly under budget by the end of this fiscal year. Next year we project an overall medical cost increase of approximately 10%. Employees will be expected to share in that rise in cost through an increase in monthly medical premiums. Effective January 2006, medical premiums will increase 11 % plus $5 which will be transferred to help rebuild the Self Insurance Fund reserve. On a monthly basis this can range from an increase of $7 to $33, depending on the plan an employee has. With the increase to the City's and the employee's contribution, in 2006 we expect to reach our funding goal of 200/0 of revenue contributed through employee medical premiums and 800/0 of revenue contributed by the City. For the first time in several years we are not recommending any changes to the plan design such as increases in co-pays, deductibles, or out-of-pocket maximums for plan year 2006. The significant changes to the plan over the last few years are working to slow the growth of our health care costs. We do anticipate making further modifications to the health plan in the future, but believe it would be best to make those decisions after we have had more experience with United Healthcare. Continuation, ofMeritPav System In 1996, the City Council adopted a merit pay for performance system that reinforces the value of productivity by rewarding those employees that maintain an acceptable level of performance. Through the Merit Pay System, employees receive an annual performance evaluation, and those employees who achieve an acceptable rating are eligible to receive an increase in pay for good job performance. This system was evaluated in the Compensation and Classification Study that was completed in 2003, and it was recommended to continue the Merit Pay System as a reward for good job performance. After careful consideration and review, the Proposed Budget provides for the continuation of the Merit Pay System by providing for an increase in pay for all full time employees that receive an acceptable performance evaluation. Those employees that do not receive satisfactory evaluations will not be eligible for a salary increase. We believe it is important to continue the Merit Pay System so that the City continues to provide incentive and acknowledgement to employees who perform their jobs well. This benefits North Richland Hills citizens in that they receive excellent customer service and quality City services from XXVII motivated employees. The Merit Pay System is based on an average 4 percent annual . increase with acceptable performance. Lump Sum . MeritPav' Proaram This program was approved by Council as part of the recommendations made by the Waters Consulting Group following the compensation and classification study completed in 2003. Under this program, all eligible regular benefited employees whose base rate of pay is at or near their pay range maximum, and whose most recent performance evaluation resulted in an acceptable or higher rating, are eligible to receive a lump sum payment on their normal merit date. The purpose of the Lump Sum Merit Pay Program is to provide an economic incentive for continued strong performance to employees regardless of their position in a pay range. Program implementation has been included in the proposed budget and is proposed to begin January of 2006. The Lump Sum Merit Pay Program is based on 2 percent of annual salary. Although it is management's desire to continue the lump sum program, it is understood and will be conveyed to employees, if approved, that this is not a guaranteed program. The lump sum pay is as the name implies - paid out one time, once a year. We hope it can be continued year after year, but it may not be possible. . . Market Adiustment In 1996, the City Council approved the Market Adjustment Plan to keep salaries competitive. Most recently, this Market Adjustment Plan was reviewed and approved as part of the Compensation and Classification Study conducted in 2003. The plan involves an annual study including a survey of 10 cities and a review of the Employee Cost Index to determine the level of adjustment necessary to keep salary ranges competitive in the labor market. In January 2005, Council approved a 3.37% adjustment to the City's Public Safety pay plan and a 2.83% adjustment to the City's Professional/Administrative and General Services pay plans. Due to economic considerations, a market adjustment is not included in the 2005/2006 budget. It is our intent to conduct a survey of the benchmark cities in the coming fiscal year in an effort to keep track of the City's competitiveness in the market; however, the recommendation is that funds not be allocated to provide adjustments to the compensation plan for next fiscal year. It is anticipated that the Market Adjustment Plan will resume in fiscal year 2006/2007. Financina for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 While the local economy is slow to recover and sales tax revenues continue to decline, the 2005/2006 Budget is balanced and sound. Overall, the budget will result in the continuation of our core functions at the same high level of service, while expanding some services to meet critical needs. The budget reflects our limited resources, as well as some temporary reductions in purchasing and replacing equipment which we expect to be fully restored in future years. XXVIII Water Current 2006 2007 2008 Base $9.00 $9.05 $9.12 $9.30 . Volume $2.45 $2.51 $2.58 $2.69 XXIX . . Despite the declines in sales tax revenue, we are very optimistic about the coming fiscal year. Residential construction and property values remain steady. The completion of the Loop 820 Corridor Study and the branding and design of State Highway 26 will create great economic potential for our City. Home Town NRH continues to grow and we will soon see construction begin on the much anticipated mixed-use commercial development called The Venue at Home Town. The new development, City Walk at Calloway Creek, and the related expansion of medical office buildings near North Hills Hospital will provide a large dose of economic activity in the future. Revitalization of Rufe Snow Drive continues with new businesses establishing themselves along the improved corridor. We also will continue to see healthy retail activity at the North Tarrant Parkway and Davis Boulevard intersection. All of these will have a positive impact on future sales tax revenues which will enable us to re-implement the programs we have proposed delaying for this coming fiscal year. The proposed 2005/2006 budget is based on maintaining the current $0.57 property tax rate and implementing recommendations from a recently completed Utility Rate Study. If approved by the Council, this will be the 13th consecutive year for maintaining the current tax rate. The Utility Rate Study, also known as the Water and Sewer Cost of Service Study, was conducted by Carolyn M. Marshall, CPA. The City Council approved funding the water and sewer rate study in 2004 and much of the work was started and completed during that year. It was determined that much of the information contained in the Utility Master Plan and the Impact Fee Study were important to the rate study; therefore, completion of the rate study was postponed until these two studies could be completed. The Utility Master Plan and Impact Fee Study and rates were approved by City Council in April of this year. The Utility Rate Study looked at the base and volume water and sewer rates, which are controlled by the City and have not changed since 1994. The study recommends a minimal increase in sewer rates, and a marginal increase in water rates to offset the increasing cost of providing service. To minimize the affect of the rate increase on customers, it is recommended the City phase in the increase over a three year period and use the Rate Stabilization Reserve established several years ago to soften the impact. Also, any rate increases should be implemented in the fall or winter when water consumption is lowest. Following shows the recommended base and volume rates to be phased in over the next three years in order to meet the revenue requirements for the system's operation and maintenance costs. %Cha 3.33% 9.79% . Sewer Current 2006 2007 2008 Base $7.22 $7.22 $7.27 $7.27 Volume $1.17 $1.17 $1.17 $1.17 %Cha 0.69% 0.000/0 The impact of the proposed rate changes on the average residential customer using 8,760 gallons per month would be $0.60 per month in 2006. If approved, this would be the first increase to the City's base and volume water and sewer rates in more than a decade. A survey shows that the new rate structure would remain competitive with our neighboring cities. In addition, the City anticipates an increase in the Fort WorthlTrinity River Authority water and sewer pass through rates in fiscal year 2005/2006. Costs associated with payments to Fort Worth and TRA are not controllable by the City; and therefore are calculated separately. The rate analyst included the verification of the pass through calculation in her analysis of revenue requirements and city staff is including the pass through rate components in their budget preparations. . Staff realizes the importance of keeping costs low for our customers, and has balanced this with the needs of continuing to provide quality water and sewer systems. The proposed increase would be the first increase in NRH base and volume rates since 1994 and will allow us to capture the revenues needed to cover costs and continue providing excellent water and sewer service to our citizens. The new rate structure is also competitive with our neighboring cities. In the coming year, City staff will continue to seek new outside revenue sources including grants and increased donations for the Library Book Fund and the Animal Adoption and Rescue Center Expansion Fund. Natural gas drilling has also been a source of revenue for some area cities and will be examined by staff and presented to the City Council as a future option. Summary and Conclusion . Although the coming fiscal year will be challenging, we will still be able to provide excellent services to our citizens. The City will not reduce service levels to citizens or reduce staffing and will restore reserves to the General Fund. It is being recommended that the City reprioritize some of its non-emergency equipment, building, and technology replacement and upgrade plans for one year. It is further suggested that we apply $200,000 in savings from other street projects and interest earnings toward the Preventive Street Maintenance Program to keep it fully funded at $600,000 and continue the program's success. xxx . . . By planning and prioritizing, we will address our community's most essential needs and make a few service enhancements. We propose to upgrade our postage machine as required by the United States Postal Service. As mandated by the State, we will implement the 2003 International Building Code. Steps have already been taken to improve our Property Protection Classification (PPC) Rating and provide residents some relief on their homeowner's insurance premiums and we propose to complete phases 2 and 3 of the PPC Rating analysis. A school crossing guard is proposed to be added at the new Walker Creek Elementary to ensure the safety of the children attending the new school. A replacement walk-in freezer is critical to safe and sanitary handling of the deceased animals at the Animal Shelter and we propose to replace this critical piece of equipment due to its condition and the safety of people and animals. It is imperative for the City to continue to retain quality employees, as the success of our City depends on them. We are in the service business and our employees are our services to the public. The employee Medical Plan will not change, but premiums to employees will increase due to rising healthcare costs and the rebuilding of reserve funds. The merit pay program is recommended to continue in addition to implementing the Lump Sum Merit Pay Program in January 2006 for those eligible employees at the top of their pay range to provide an economic incentive for continued strong performance. Finally market adjustments will be delayed this fiscal year, but are anticipated to return in the 2006/2007 fiscal year. The recently completed Water and Sewer Rate Study will be incorporated into this year's Utility Fund budget. Although rates will increase slightly, they will remain competitive with our neighboring cities and ensure our utility system needs are addressed. Finally, the proposed budget maintains the current $0.57 property tax rate for the 13th consecutive year. Department Directors, the Finance and Budget Departments and City Management have put a great deal of time and effort into preparing a balanced budget, while also incorporating the City Council's Goals and Objectives. We are grateful for their dedication and teamwork. We could not have met the challenges and presented a sound budget document without their cooperation and efforts. The City Council should also be commended for its leadership and vision. The Council's Goals and Objectives are the driving force that ensures the City will continue to provide quality services and address critical needs. The future looks bright, and I along with staff commend the City Council for the time and dedication they have put forth to make sure North Richland Hills continues to be the City of Choice to Live, Work, and Play. Respectfully Submitted, Larry J. Cunningham City Manager XXXI . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 1 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Taxes $22,005,941 $22,954,899 $23,075,296 $22,763,617 $23,643,996 Fines & Forfeitures 1,582,165 1,775,902 1,728,080 1,718,980 1,825,473 Licenses & Permits 1 ,665,390 1,606,447 1,556,140 1 ,444,102 1,515,900 Charges for Service 1,954,556 1,831,681 1,942,142 1,893,451 1,991,333 Intergovernmental 3,004,728 3,164,230 3,280,885 3,280,885 3,198,934 Miscellaneous 346,508 275,320 499,749 515,216 566,551 Sub-Total Revenues $30,559,288 $31,608,479 $32,082,292 $31,616,251 $32,742,187 Appropriation - Settlement $0 $0 $0 $650,000 $650,000 Appropriation - Insurance Reserve ° ° 347,250 347,250 103,800 Appropriation - PY Encumbrance 0 0 0 394,734 0 TOTAL REVENUES $30,559,288 $31,608,479 $32,429,542 $33,008,235 $33,495,987 EXPENDITURES City Council $138,493 $157,044 $159,615 $158,715 $132,513 City Manager 479,416 501,894 486,165 485,031 492,109 Communications 490,410 475,648 487,279 478,373 475,571 City Secretary 392,590 405,550 426,846 423,329 437,924 Legal 635,829 637,012 500,033 499,480 498,783 Human Resources 99,687 99,506 111 ,576 108,367 124,368 Finance 703,277 733,335 756,933 749,390 746,104 Budget & Research 294,005 315,230 313,069 311,289 326,092 Municipal Court 1,014,774 992,842 1,021,482 1,017,805 1,042,381 Planning and Development 936,365 819,329 878,222 835,210 905,257 Economic Development 93,820 95,501 100,787 100,787 121,958 Library 1,388,844 1,457,168 1,479,744 1,473,060 1,483,233 Neighborhood Services 1,047,875 1 ,262,090 1 ,348,558 1,308,825 1,402,747 Public Works 2,909,068 2,278,244 2,879,116 2,750,096 2,863,329 Parks & Recreation 2,421,367 2,346,225 2,422,296 2,371,689 2,352,209 Pol ice 8,239,758 8,540,424 8,799,788 8,634,227 8,929,993 Fire 7,213,601 7,330,422 7,890,793 7,881,351 8,245,781 Building Services 867,150 845,124 787,377 787,377 629,196 Non-Departmental 712,568 868,304 988,711 927,711 947,563 Sub-Total Departments $30,078,897 $30,160,892 $31,838,390 $31,302,112 $32,157,111 Reserve for Capital Improvements $450,000 $550,000 $150,000 $200,000 $100,000 Market Adjustment ° 0 67,926 ° 0 Lump Sum Merit ° 0 ° ° 92,594 Legal Settlement ° 0 0 650,000 650,000 Insurance Reserve Policy ° 0 347,250 347,250 103,800 Previous Year Encumbrances 394,734 Sub-Total Other $30,528,897 $30,710,879 $32,403,566 $32,894,096 $33,103,505 Proposed Service Enhancements 36,831 29,958 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $30,528,897 $30,710,879 $32,403,566 $32,930,927 $33,133,463 Restoration of General Fund Reserves $287,937 BALANCE $30,391 $897,600 $25,976 $77,308 $74,587 . . . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 2 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES . GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 TAXES Current Property Taxes $9,013,449 $9,720,352 $10,183,013 $10,183,013 $11,233,002 Delinquent Property Taxes 140,545 280,075 142,050 210,000 150,000 Penalty and Interest 115,129 160,925 98,483 140,000 100,000 Franchise Fees 3,684,707 3,592,682 3,443,000 3,383,842 3,400,000 Utility Fund Franchise Taxes 547,421 558,976 595,942 595,942 618,787 Sales Taxes 8,082,777 8,215,869 8,204,423 7,845,435 7,722,225 Mixed Beverages 114, 122 107,164 110,000 107,000 110,000 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 307,791 318,856 298,385 298,385 309,982 Sub-Total $22,005,941 $22,954,899 $23,075,296 $22,763,617 $23,643,996 FINES AND FORFEITURES Municipal Court Fines $1,303,005 $1,481,248 $1,426,080 $1,419,980 $1,516,473 Library Fines 61 ,046 60,561 58,000 57,000 60,000 Warrant & Arrest Fees 218,114 234,093 244,000 242,000 249,000 Sub-Total $1,582,165 $1,775,902 $1,728,080 $1,718,980 $1,825,473 . LICENSES AND PERMITS Building Permits $680,668 $669,572 $630,000 $630,000 $650,000 Electrical Permits 72,514 57,946 60,000 60,000 60,000 Plumbing Permits 80,348 72,925 68,000 68,000 73,000 Mechanical Permits 35,040 49,697 38,500 38,500 44,000 Miscellaneous Permits 71,998 79,180 70,800 64,450 66,250 Apartment Inspection Fees ° 47,641 79,200 75,000 81,500 Curb & Drainage Insp. Fees 119,820 100,192 121,000 50,000 60,000 Re-Inspection Fees 9,51 ° 17,940 12,000 14,000 14,000 License Fees 15,303 15,500 12,000 13,000 14,000 Contractor Registration Fees 86,640 83,334 84,000 72,000 70,000 Plan Review/Application Fee 132,187 94,275 89,000 50,000 45,000 Animal License/Adoption Fees 76,975 72,079 79,540 68,432 74,250 Animal Control Impoundment 56,558 56, 163 53,500 65,220 78,000 Crematorium Revenues 5,533 5,021 4,500 4,000 4,200 Auto Impoundment Fees 55,893 15,371 0 7,900 15,000 Food Service Permits 99,108 101,660 91,000 100,000 101,000 Food Managers School 10,535 15,720 13,000 14,000 15,000 Fire Inspection/Alarm Fees 23,61 ° 20,132 17,000 16,500 16,500 Publicity Fees - Recreation 33, 1 50 32,099 33,100 33,100 34,200 Sub-Total $1,665,390 $1,606,447 $1,556,140 $1,444,102 $1,515,900 . · FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 2 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 CHARGES FOR SERVICE Park Facility Rental $3,485 $6,620 $3,450 $4,500 $5,740 Recreation Center Rental 13,310 11 ,222 17,000 14,120 14,120 Ambulance Fees 935,631 932,246 960,000 987,000 1,036,350 Garbage Billing 248,858 235,236 230,000 230,000 230,000 Contributions 10,000 10,000 1 0,000 1 0,000 10,000 Maps & Codes 666 126 300 150 150 Recreation Fees 408,680 355,401 464,107 399,171 421,717 Cultural Arts 6,368 14,129 6,500 6,500 7,000 Athletic Revenue 148,667 126,120 112,255 103,746 126,606 Recreation Special Events 34,897 8,586 11,530 12,764 14,500 Planning & Zoning Fees 42,044 30,364 30,000 32,000 30,000 Sale of Accident Reports 27,093 27,619 25,000 23,500 25,000 Vital Statistics 54,861 56,676 53,000 53,000 53,000 Mowing 14,562 16,811 18,000 17,000 17, 150 Video Services Income 4,930 500 500 0 0 Video Tape Sales 504 25 500 0 0 Sub-Total $1,954,556 $1,831,681 $1,942,142 $1,893,451 $1,991,333 INTERGOVERNMENTAL Indirect Costs: General CIP $105,000 $105,000 $155,000 $155,000 $155,000 Utility Fund 1,163,964 1,222,164 1,283,271 1,283,271 1,347,435 Park & Rec Facilities Dev. Corp. 230,076 241,582 253,659 253,659 261,269 Crime Control District 382,800 401,940 401,942 401,942 300,000 Aquatic Park Fund 85,800 90,084 94,588 94,588 97,426 Direct Cost - General Fund 1,037,088 1,103,460 1,092,425 1,092,425 1,037,804 Police Department Salaries Sub-Total $3,004,728 $3,164,230 $3,280,885 $3,280,885 $3,198,934 MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income $88,638 $66,181 $83,500 $200,000 $285,000 Sale of City Property 9, 184 3,286 0 0 0 Grant Proceeds-Crim. Justice 62,556 6,955 79,000 5,000 12,000 Grant Proceeds-CDBG 0 49,874 25,000 30,000 25,000 Overtime Reimbursements 9,801 11,698 9,800 6,000 7,000 Tax Attorney Fees 49,998 79,756 35,000 40,000 50,000 Other Income 106,727 44,012 37,551 31 ,551 37,551 Sponsorships (Fire) 0 0 27,233 0 0 Special Invest. Fund Loan Payment 19,604 13,558 52,665 52,665 0 SRO Reimbursement (8150) 0 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 Sub-Total $346,508 $275,320 $499,749 $515,216 $566,551 Appropriation - Legal Settlement $0 $0 $0 $650,000 $650,000 Appropriation - Insurance Reserve 0 0 347,250 347,250 103,800 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 394,734 0 TOTAL REVENUES $30,559,288 $31,608,479 $32,429,542 $33,008,235 $33,495,987 . . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 City Council $138,493 $157,044 $159,615 $158,715 $132,513 City Manager $479,416 $501,894 $486,165 $485,031 $492,109 Communications Public Information $207,152 $201 ,645 $197,902 $196,149 $197,210 Citicable 283,258 274,003 289,377 282,224 278,361 Total Communications $490,410 $475,648 $487,279 $478,373 $475,571 City Secretary City Secretary $220,360 $231 , 198 $238,919 $236,702 $248,261 Record Management 172,230 174,352 187,927 186,627 189,663 Total City Secretary $392,590 $405,550 $426,846 $423,329 $437,924 Legal $635,829 $637,012 $500,033 $499,480 $498,783 Human Resources $99,687 $99,506 $111,576 $108,367 $124,368 Finance Accounting & Administration $486,679 $509,375 $527,756 $522,430 $513,393 Purchasing 216,598 223,960 229,177 226,960 232,711 Total Finance $703,277 $733,335 $756,933 $749,390 $746,104 Budget & Research Budget $78,446 $80,641 $83,914 $82,860 $93,795 Tax 179, 1 36 202,193 187,801 187,801 191,940 Internal Audit 36,423 32,396 41 ,354 40,628 40,357 Total Budget & Research $294,005 $315,230 $313,069 $311,289 $326,092 Municipal Court Ad ministration/Prosecution $337,290 $289,360 $270,545 $271,929 $273,711 Court Records 280,534 286,482 317,493 320,684 328,598 Warrants 269,342 288,200 297,344 290,417 296,998 Teen Court 52,595 54,643 58,540 57,215 60,863 Judicial 75,013 74,157 77,560 77,560 82,211 Total Municipal Court $1,014,774 $992,842 $1,021,482 $1,017,805 $1,042,381 Planning and Development Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,088 Inspections 570,064 585,520 644,824 628,373 588,656 Planning 366,301 233,809 233,398 206,837 261,513 Total Planning and Development $936,365 $819,329 $878,222 $835,210 $905,257 Economic Development $93,820 $95,501 $100,787 $100,787 $121,958 Library General Services $184,491 $185,990 $198,268 $197,149 $191,110 Public Services 643,559 687,894 657,860 654,155 667,689 Technical Services 560,794 583,284 623,616 621,756 624,434 Total Library $1,388,844 $1,457,168 $1,479,744 $1,473,060 $1,483,233 . . . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES · GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 Neighborhood Services Neighborhood Resources $265,357 $264,115 $258,779 $253,077 $273,852 Humane Division 555,479 566,610 576,944 551,839 591,168 Consumer Health 227,039 228,428 258,283 250,220 262,564 Code Enforcement ° 202,937 254,552 253,689 275,163 Total Neighborhood Services $1,047,875 $1,262,090 $1,348,558 $1,308,825 $1,402,747 Public Works General Services $131,774 $130,039 $144,755 $143,902 $147,084 Traffic Control 800,755 844,897 894,433 834,534 853,690 Street & Drainage 1,976,539 1 ,303,308 1,839,928 1,771,660 1,862,555 Total Public Works $2,909,068 $2,278,244 $2,879,116 $2,750,096 $2,863,329 Park & Recreation General Services $137,271 $151,787 $122,788 $87,675 $116,329 Parks Maintenance 1,020,378 993,944 1,041,982 1,033,830 1,000,550 Recreation Services 730,11 ° 750,244 786,816 782, 156 755,043 Athletic Program Services 228,702 195,958 201,352 200,423 202,792 Senior Adult Services 146,524 142,890 149,688 148,624 152,188 Youth Outreach & Cultural 158,382 111,402 119,670 118,981 125,307 · Total Park & Recreation $2,421,367 $2,346,225 $2,422,296 $2,371,689 $2,352,209 Police General Services $440,680 $463,298 $480,007 $443,957 $489,615 Administrative Services 591,425 571,130 617,767 618,277 613,377 Criminal I nvestigation 1,641,212 1,731,717 1,761,657 1,694,262 1,772,731 Uniform Patrol 3,595,896 3,732,267 3,847,533 3,792,510 3,984,088 Tactical Unit 24,667 27,925 29,843 29,662 19,759 Technical Services 738,342 769,422 725,404 721,771 722,885 Detention Services 344,974 350,152 376,282 375,332 379,635 Property Evidence 111,191 114,921 119,237 117,917 121,469 Communications 751,371 779,592 842,058 840,539 826,434 Total Police $8,239,758 $8,540,424 $8,799,788 $8,634,227 $8,929,993 Fire Department General Services $244,642 $261,899 $272,322 $271,762 $279,466 Operations 5,338,265 5,589,230 6,104,567 6,093,169 6,460,847 Emergency Medical 813,978 694,242 798,109 798,660 789,418 Fire Inspections 381 ,692 374,887 387,170 387,353 397,649 Emergency Management 435,024 410,164 328,625 330,407 318,401 Total Fire $7,213,601 $7,330,422 $7,890,793 $7,881,351 $8,245,781 · .. FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES . GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 Building Services $867,150 $845,124 $787,377 $787,377 $629,196 Non-Departmental $712,568 $868,304 $988,711 $927,711 $947,563 Market Adjustment $0 $0 $67,926 $0 $0 Lump Sum Merit $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,594 Reserve for Capital Improvements $450,000 $550,000 $150,000 $200,000 $100,000 Legal Settlement $0 -$0 $0 $650,000 $650,000 Operating Transfers Out $0 $0 $347,250 $347,250 $103,800 Previous Year Encumbrances $394,734 SUB-TOTAL EXPENDITURES $30,528,897 $30,710,892 $32,403,566 $32,894,096 $33,103,505 Proposed Service Enhancements Mandated Cost - Postage Machine $36,831 Walk-in Freezer Expansion $9,397 . Professional Services for I SO Rating $8,800 School Crossing Guard - New School $6,061 Mandated Cost - 2003 International Building Code $5,700 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $30,528,897 $30,710,892 $32,403,566 $32,930,927 $33,133,463 Restoration of General Fund Reserves $287,937 BALANCE $30,391 $897,587 $25,976 $77,308 $74,587 . . . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 4 - SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION NET TAXABLE VALUE: Total Appraised Value as of July 25, 2005 Less Exemptions: Disabled Veteran Over 65 Homestead Disabled Persons Less: Personal Property Nominal Value Loss Abatement Value Loss Agricultural Value Loss Freeport Inventory Value Loss Pollution Control/Prorated Absolute Total Reduction to Values Add: Estimated Minimum ARB protested values Incomplete Property NET TAXABLE VALUE ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS: Net Taxable Value Proposed Tax Rate per $100 Valuation Estimated Total Tax Levy at 100°J'o Collection Less Estimated 1 % for Uncollectables Less TIF Transfer Less Debt Service Transfer TOTAL ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS(Operations) 99% TAX RATE DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE: General Fund - Maintenance & Operations Debt Service Fund TOTAL DISTRIBUTION OF TAX RATE DISTRIBUTION OF ESTIMATED TAX REVENUE: Transfer to Debt Service Fund (per 7-22-05 Council Books) General Fund - Maintenance & Operations (per 7-22-05 Council Books) General Fund - Maintenance & Operations (per 7-25-05 Certified Roll) To be used for restoration of General Fund Reserves General Fund - Maintenance & Operations Total (per 7-25-05 Certified Roll) . TOTAL ESTIMATED TAX REVENUE % of Total Tax Rate 60.4% 39.6% 1 Oook 1000k Collection 7,362,315 11,129,988 290,846 11,420,834 $18,783,149 $3,641,601,721 (3,559,503) (102,499,017) (282,023,568) (10,247,472) o o (9,175,999) (3,890,195) (248,490) ($411,644,244) 54,208,156 11,123,620 $3,295,289,253 $3,295,289,253 $0.57 $18,783,149 (187,831) (683,092) (6,679,223) $11,233,002 Tax Rate Distribution $0.344324 $0.225676 $0.57000 Projected Collection 7,362,315 10,945,065 287,937 11,233,002 $18,595,317 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 5 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES · GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 Beginning Balance $1,744,579 $1,830,454 $1,891,747 $1,923,181 $1,677,942 REVENUES General Debt Service Taxes $6,411,344 $6,710,540 $6,862,025 $6,862,025 $6,679,223 TIF #1 and #2 Taxes 338,656 441,768 579,910 550,780 683,092 Sub-Total Ad Valorem Taxes $6,750,000 $7,152,308 $7,441,935 $7,412,805 $7,362,315 Transfer In From: Drainage Utility $794,292 $732,414 $730,767 $730,767 $711,368 Park & Rec. Facilities Dev. Corp. 227,072 218,744 212,196 212,196 205,425 Miscellaneous 22,021 ° ° ° ° Information Services Fund 219,965 ° ° ° ° Equipment Services Fund 105,860 101,816 102,647 102,647 98,353 Building Services Fund 46,204 44,905 43,607 43,607 42,309 Bond Refunding Proceeds ° 3,815,000 ° ° ° I nterest Income 37,966 41 ,744 50,000 50,000 50,000 City of Watauga, CIP Participation 19,785 19,785 19,785 19,785 19,785 · TOTAL REVENUES $8,223, 165 $12,126,716 $8,600,937 $8,571,807 $8,489,555 EXPENDITURES Existing Bonds & C.O.'s $7,746,756 $7,777,871 $8,253,066 $8,253,066 $7,478,951 TIF #1 and #2 Funding 338,656 441,768 579,910 550,780 683,092 Issuance Costs/Paying Agent Fees 51,878 119,964 121,200 13,200 110,200 Bond Refunding Escrow Payment 0 3,694,386 0 0 ° TOTAL EXPENDITURES $8,137,290 $12,033,989 $8,954,176 $8,817,046 $8,272,243 NET REVENUE $85,875 $92,727 ($353,239) ($245,239) $217,312 ENDING BALANCE $1,830,454 $1,923,181 $1,538,508 $1,677,942 $1,895,254 · . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 6 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES UTILITY FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Water Sales and Charges $12,312,982 $12,062,916 $12,552,444 $12,594,562 $13,103,796 Sewer Sales and Charges 6,927,780 7,133,484 6,960,543 7,229,722 7,475,444 Miscellaneous 563,871 518,495 756,334 955,938 1,085,765 Sub-Total Revenues $19,804,633 $19,714,895 $20,269,321 $20,780,222 $21,665,005 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances $192,673 TOTAL REVENUES $19,804,633 $19,714,895 $20,269,321 $20,972,895 $21,665,005 EXPENDITURES ODeratina Administration $211,750 $217,983 $212,997 $212,997 $236,671 Public Works 3,284,583 3,414,012 3,829,125 3,815,912 3,983,050 Development 547,812 506,478 557,273 552,523 584,603 Right of Way Maintenance 118,019 121,330 125,000 125,000 125,000 Utility Billing & Collections 1,097,934 1,151,402 1,203,493 1 ,201 ,423 1,232,257 Budget & Research 133,559 145,594 158,420 158,420 173,201 Accounting Services 116,810 120,373 133,711 132,826 139,720 Purchase of Water/Sewer FTW 3,200,350 2,090,275 3,383,526 3,383,526 3,511,740 Purchase of Water/Sewer TRA 5,817,693 7,061,380 6,209,693 6,209,693 6,579,550 Building Services 812,329 847,320 889,686 889,686 934,170 Non-Departmental 259,857 270,631 383,252 390,756 375,802 Sub-Total $15,600,696 $15,946,778 $17,086,176 $17,072,762 $17,875,764 Other & Reserves Debt Service $981,781 $621,387 $485,231 $485,231 $471,290 Franchise Fees 547,421 558,976 595,942 595,942 618,787 Indirect Costs 1,163,964 1 ,222, 164 1,283,271 1,283,271 1,347,435 Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 307,791 318,856 298,385 298,385 309,982 Transfer from Utility CI P Reserve to 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 I nformation Services Fund Contribution to Equipment Svs. 125,000 125,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Transfer to Self Insurance Fund 103,000 100,000 115,750 115,750 34,600 Transfer from Water to Sewer 0 0 ° 0 ° Transfer from Sewer to Water 0 0 75,000 0 0 Market Adjustment 0 ° 9,504 0 0 Reserve for Capital Projects 799,980 646,734 95,062 703,881 782,147 Sub-Total $4,203,937 $3,768,117 $3,183,145 $3,707,460 $3,789,241 Previous Year Encumbrances 192,673 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $19,804,633 $19,714,895 $20,269,321 $20,972,895 $21,665,005 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 7 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES . UTILITY FUND - WATER OPERATIONS ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Water Sales and Charaes Water Sales $11,919,629 $11,893,839 $12,373,931 $12,423,049 $12,932,283 Water Taps 68,764 58,495 67,593 67,593 67,593 Water Inspection Fees 26,898 27,181 27,000 20,000 20,000 Service Charges 217,007 76,542 70,920 70,920 70,920 Water Wells 13,336 6,859 13,000 13,000 13,000 Miscellaneous 67,348 0 0 ° 0 Sub-Total $12,312,982 $12,062,916 $12,552,444 $12,594,562 $13,103,796 Miscellaneous I nterest Income $49,239 ($24,342) $30,000 $78,810 $123,000 Late Charges 230,521 254,174 247,577 306,000 306,000 Joint Use Reimbursement-Watauga 44,054 81,291 49,656 45,000 45,000 Subdivision Meter Revenue 53,550 54,150 53,300 54,000 54,000 Transfer from Sewer 0 ° 75,000 99,838 0 Appropriation - Rate Stabilization ° ° 0 ° 200,000 Appropriation - I nsurance Reserves ° ° 69,450 69,450 20,760 . Sub-Total $377,364 $365,273 $524,983 $653,098 $748,760 TOTAL REVENUES $12,690,346 $12,428,189 $13,077,427 $13,247,660 $13,852,556 EXPENDITURES ODeratina Administration $127,050 $130,790 $127,796 $127,796 $142,003 Water Operations 2,537,227 2,608,613 2,918,480 3,048,260 3,049,367 Purchase of Water FTW 2,216,424 1,149,237 2,459,246 2,459,246 2,532,000 Purchase of Water TRA 3,365,844 4,269,837 3,601,455 3,601 ,455 3,781,050 Development 328,687 303,887 334,364 331,514 350,762 Right of Way Maintenance 70,811 72,798 75,000 75,000 75,000 Sub-Total $8,646,043 $8,535,162 $9,516,341 $9,643,271 $9,930,182 Finance/Utilitv Collections Meter Reading $194,618 $199,412 $204,454 $203,627 $209,070 Utility Billing/Customer Service 360,883 375,694 392,867 394,067 401,567 Utility Collection Services 103,259 115,735 124,773 124,773 128,717 Accounting Services 70,086 72,231 80,226 80,373 83,832 Budget & Research 80,135 87,356 95,052 95,052 103,921 Sub-Total $808,981 $850,428 $897,372 $897,892 $927,107 . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 7 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES . UTILITY FUND - WATER OPERATIONS ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 Building Services $487,397 $508,392 $533,812 $533,812 $560,502 Non-Departmental $155,914 $162,379 $229,951 $264,847 $225,481 Sub-Total $10,098,335 $10,056,361 $11,177,476 $11,339,822 $11,643,272 Other & Reserves Debt Service $589,069 $372,832 $291, 139 $291,139 $282,774 Franchise Fees 349,832 350,106 383,592 383,592 395,563 Indirect Costs 710,016 745,524 782,796 782,796 821,936 Payment In Lieu 'Of Taxes 184,675 191,314 179,031 179,031 185,989 Transfer from Utility CIP Reserve to 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 I nformation Services Fund Contribution to Building/Equip. Svs 75,000 75,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Transfer to Self Insurance Fund 61,800 60,000 69,450 69,450 20,760 Transfer to Sewer 0 0 0 0 0 Market Adjustment 0 ° 5,702 0 0 Reserve for Capital Projects 516,619 472,052 53,241 66,830 367,262 Sub-Total $2,592,011 $2,371,828 $1,899,951 $1,907,838 $2,209,284 . TOTAL EXPENDITURES $12,690,346 $12,428,189 $13,077,427 $13,247,660 $13,852,556 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 8 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES · UTILITY FUND - SEWER OPERATIONS ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Sewer Sales and Charaes Sewer Sales $6,679,710 $7,038,395 $6,850,000 $7,128,829 $7,374,551 Sewer Taps 22,560 19,115 22,113 22, 113 22, 113 Sewer Inspection Fees 35,940 23,544 39,650 30,000 30,000 Service Charges 144,671 51,028 47,280 47,280 47,280 Miscellaneous 44,899 1,402 1,500 1,500 1 ,500 Sub-Total $6,927,780 $7,133,484 $6,960,543 $7,229,722 $7,475,444 Miscellaneous Interest Income $32,826 ($16,228) $20,000 $52,540 $82,000 Late Charges 153,681 169,450 165,051 204,000 204,000 Transfer from Water 0 0 0 0 ° Appropriation - Rate Stabilization 0 0 0 0 37,165 Appropriation - Insurance Reserves 0 0 46,300 46,300 13,840 Sub-Total $186,507 $153,222 $231,351 $302,840 $337,005 TOTAL REVENUES $7,114,287 $7,286,706 $ 7, 191 ,894 $7,532,562 $7,812,449 · EXPENDITURES ODeratina Administration $84,700 $87,193 $85,201 $85,201 $94,668 Sewer Operations 747,356 805,399 910,645 905,851 933,683 Sewer Treatment FTW 983,926 941,038 924,280 924,280 979,740 Sewer Treatment TRA 2,451,849 2,791,543 2,608,238 2,608,238 2,798,500 Development 219,125 202,591 222,909 221,009 233,841 Right of Way Maintenance 47,208 48,532 50,000 50,000 50,000 Sub-Total $4,534,164 $4,876,296 $4,801,273 $4,794,579 $5,090,432 Finance/Utility Collections Meter Reading $129,746 $132,942 $136,304 $135,752 $139,380 Utility Billing/Customer Service 240,589 250,462 264,896 262,712 267,711 Utility Collection Services 68,839 77,157 80,199 83,182 85,812 Accounting Services 46,724 48,142 53,485 53,582 55,888 Budget & Research 53,424 58,238 63,368 63,368 69,280 Sub-Total $539,322 $566,941 $598,252 $598,596 $618,071 · FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 8 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES . UTILITY FUND - SEWER OPERATIONS ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 Building Services $324,932 $338,928 $355,874 $355,874 $373,668 Non-Departmental $103,943 $108,252 $153,301 $176,564 $150,321 Sub-Total $5,502,361 $5,890,417 $5,908,700 $5,925,613 $6,232,492 Other & Reserves Debt Service $392,712 $248,555 $194,092 $194,092 $188,516 Franchise Fees 197,589 208,870 212,350 212,350 223,224 Indirect Costs 453,948 476,640 500,475 500,475 525,499 Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 123,116 127,542 119,354 119,354 123,993 Transfer from Utility CIP Reserve to 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 Information Services Fund Contribution to Building/Equip. Svs 50,000 50,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Transfer to Self Insurance Fund 41 ,200 40,000 46,300 46,300 1 3,840 Transfer to Water ° 0 75,000 0 0 Market Adjustment ° 0 3,802 0 0 Reserve for Capital Projects 283,361 174,682 41,821 444,378 414,885 Sub-Total $1,611,926 $1,396,289 $1,283,194 $1,606,949 $1,579,957 . TOTAL EXPENDITURES $7,114,287 $7,286,706 $7,191,894 $7,532,562 $7,812,449 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 9 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GOLF COURSE FUND · ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Green Fees $1,005,744 $943,718 $1,149,566 $1,033,307 $851,022 Pro Shop 205,331 232,441 240,261 322,819 258,678 Driving Range 107,903 121,983 127,070 71,658 51,557 Carts 433,702 457,726 498,593 397,706 289,598 Food & Beverage 380,360 391,208 481,512 449,219 355,476 Insurance Proceeds 159,234 0 0 0 0 Other Revenue 54,453 45,290 23,744 40,680 36,800 Economic Development 0 0 0 0 550,000 Sales Tax Revenue * Appropriation of Fund Balance 189,922 320,945 0 192,363 0 TOTAL REVENUES $2,536,649 $2,513,311 $2,520,746 $2,507,752 $2,393,131 Cost of Goods Sold $244,796 $249,284 $296,839 $277,760 $217,217 NET REVENUES $2,291,853 $2,264,027 $2,223,907 $2,229,992 $2,175,914 EXPENDITURES Pro Shop $239,213 $249,970 $261,658 $252,257 $246,735 · Driving Range 11,595 9,382 10,550 11 ,002 8,700 Golf Carts 158,273 175,897 171 , 198 174,343 150,069 Course Maintenance 2 678,662 532,328 600,001 582,231 557,513 Food & Beverage 167,051 157,125 176,709 179,172 146,760 General & Administrative 246,787 214,660 209,797 209,450 189,682 Fixed Charges 137,121 137,600 147,600 147,600 85,600 Capital ' 0 183,805 ° 0 100,000 Debt Service 3 508,213 496,565 523,851 524,966 515,499 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,146,915 $2,157,332 $2,101,364 $2,081,021 $2,000,558 Reserve for EquipmentlCIP $0 $0 $23,814 $0 $55,715 Payment to Debt - Water Fund $88,485 $50,242 $0 $50,242 $50,242 Payment to Debt - General Fund $56,453 $56,453 $56,454 $56,454 $28,227 Payment to Debt - Equipment $0 $0 $42,275 $42,275 $41,172 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * The Greens Reconstruction Project totaling $550,000 is shown in the Golf Operating Fund budget above. 48 Sales tax will be utilized for this project which includes partial payment of the annual golf course debt service. 1 Capital Contract for Removing & Replanting Grass $ 100,000 2 Course Maintenance Care & Maintenance of Greens $ 150,000 · 3 Debt Service Annual Golf Course Debt Service (partial) $ 300,000 Total Project Costs $ 550,000 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 10 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AQUATIC PARK FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Admissions $1,594,589 $1,502,149 $2,126,275 $1,832,164 $1,998,671 Advanced & Group Sales 626,870 704,206 710,655 809,713 812,684 Food and Beverage 454,775 404,927 540,845 439,059 499,112 Merchandise 109,290 89,954 154,041 96,593 102,091 Lockers 49,555 42,261 74,937 48,297 54,448 Other 899 27, 143 13,797 10,114 10,114 Aquatic Classes/Special Events 64,941 64,503 67,170 68,905 75,167 Interest Income 38,869 32,528 30,000 32,000 33,000 Donations 20,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 Sub-Total Revenues $2,959,788 $2,887,671 $3,737,720 $3,346,845 $3,595,287 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances $0 $353,558 $0 $95,446 $0 Appropriation of Insurance Reserve ° 129,954 0 0 0 Loan from I nfrastructure Reserve 100,000 ° 0 0 ° TOTAL REVENUES $3,059,788 $3,371,183 $3,737,720 $3,442,291 $3,595,287 EXPENDITURES ODeratina General Services & Utilities $659,188 $551,663 $688,787 $556,174 $686,578 Public Groundsl Aquatics/Maint. 792,701 810,853 839,835 743,941 806,731 Business & Office Administration 390,937 435,433 479,537 423,864 451,470 Gift Shop/Concessions 403,827 373,993 483,213 438,299 437,881 Sales/Special Events/Admissions 249,237 231,465 289,240 256,966 269,315 Sub-Total $2,495,890 $2,403,407 $2,780,612 $2,419,244 $2,651,975 Other & Reserves Debt Service $221,858 $347,738 $400,587 $400,587 $390,873 Infrastructure Reserve Payment 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 Indirect Costs 85,800 90,084 94,588 94,588 97,426 Market Adjustment 0 0 2,131 0 ° Allocation to Internal Svc Funds 0 129,954 0 0 0 Reserve For: Infrastructure & Major Repairs 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 Park Expansion (143,760) 0 2,376 0 74,997 Insurance 75,000 75,000 75,000 50,000 0 Non-Departmental 0 0 7,426 7,426 5,016 Sub-Total $563,898 $967,776 $957,108 $927,601 $943,312 Previous Year Encumbrances 95,446 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,059,788 $3,371,183 $3,737,720 $3,442,291 $3,595,287 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 · FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 11 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES BUILDING SERVICES FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Charaes for Service General Fund $867,150 $845,124 $787,377 $787,377 $629,196 Utility Fund 812,329 847,320 889,686 889,686 934,170 Sub-Total $1,679,479 $1,692,444 $1,677,063 $1,677,063 $1,563,366 Other I nterest Income $22,255 $22,538 $18,275 $46,136 $60,415 Appropriation of Reserve ° ° 35,704 27,282 212,100 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances ° 0 ° 118,023 ° Sub-Total $22,255 $22,538 $53,979 $191,441 $272,515 TOTAL REVENUES $1,701,734 $1,714,982 $1,731,042 $1,868,504 $1,835,881 EXPENDITURES Ooeratina General Services $134,637 $130,888 $142,286 $142,486 $146,280 Building Services 1,137,450 1,164,732 1,330,357 1,356,119 1,504,328 Transfer to Capital Budget 315,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 134,750 Sub-Total $1,587,087 $1,495,620 $1,672,643 $1,698,605 $1,785,358 Other & Reserves Debt Service $46,204 $44,905 $43,607 $43,607 $42,309 Market Adjustment ° 0 2,212 ° ° Other 1 , 167 1,000 8,269 8,269 8,214 Reserve for Capital Projects 67,276 173,457 4,311 0 0 Sub-Total Departments $114,647 $219,362 $58,399 $51,876 $50,523 Previous Year Encumbrances $118,023 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,701,734 $1,714,982 $1,731,042 $1,868,504 $1,835,881 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 · · FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 12 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Charaes for Service Transfers From: General Fund $769,127 $806,556 $862,989 $748,880 $665,005 Utility Fund 771,227 896,232 825,212 825,212 882,976 Utility CIP / Utility Construction 113, 149 113,148 121,068 121,068 129,542 Crime Control & Prevention District 416,799 66,804 71,475 52,462 75,764 Park & Recreation Devlp. Fund 54,206 54,204 58,000 38,987 63,464 Other Funds 28,749 28,764 30,762 30,762 32,915 Sub-Total $2, 153,257 $1,965,708 $1,969,506 $1,817,371 $1,849,666 Other I nterest Income $35,125 $31,410 $25,700 $63,031 $82,574 Sale of City Property 101,631 33,542 30,000 30,000 54,000 Other 0 0 ° 0 0 Transfer from Utility Fund 125,000 125,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Transfer from CCD 350,000 0 100,000 100,000 25,000 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 1,631 0 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 365,676 365,676 0 Sub-Total $611 ,756 $189,952 $571,376 $610,338 $211,574 . TOTAL REVENUES $2,765,013 $2,155,660 $2,540,882 $2,427,709 $2,061,240 EXPENDITURES Ooeratina General Services $142,068 $138,118 $148,980 $149,180 $153,390 Equipment Services Operations 1,276,154 1,143,940 1,231,514 1,282,450 1,356,589 Equipment Purchases 680,515 594,859 561 ,200 402,178 80,000 Police Vehicles/Equipment 0 0 481,480 481,480 231,545 Fire Vehicles/Equipment 0 0 0 0 30,400 Sub-Total $2,098,737 $1,876,917 $2,423,174 $2,315,288 $1,851,924 Other & Reserves Debt Service $105,860 $101,816 $102,647 $102,647 $98,353 Market Adjustment 0 0 1,631 0 0 Other 1 ,470 0 8,143 8,143 8,047 Equipment Services Reserve 558,946 176,927 5,287 0 102,916 Sub-Total Departments $666,276 $278,743 $117,708 $110,790 $209,316 Previous Year Encumbrances $1,631 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,765,013 $2,155,660 $2,540,882 $2,427,709 $2,061,240 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 13 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES . SELF INSURANCE FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Health/Medical $3,542,803 $4,248,576 $5,666,651 $5,666,651 $6,029,635 Workers' Compensation 752,909 1,017,798 406,705 406,705 483,232 General Liability/Unemployment 357,012 318,012 189,822 189,822 304,766 Property Insurance 0 49,000 160,822 160,822 81,625 I nterest Income 48,285 4,659 7,745 2,500 10,351 Other Income 3,884 0 0 0 0 Transfer from General 0 0 347,250 347,250 103,800 Transfer from Utility Funds 103,000 100,000 115,750 115,750 34,600 Transfer from Aquatic Park Fund 0 129,954 0 0 0 Appropriation of Reserve 2,378,874 499,555 0 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $7,186,767 $6,367,554 $6,894,745 $6,889,500 $7,048,009 EXPENDITURES Health/Medical $5,830,807 $5,004,447 $5,051,426 $5,051,426 $5,558,962 Workers' Compensation 473,195 466,379 372,714 372,714 451,575 Other Insurance 325,411 336,761 326,600 326,600 361,078 Personnel Expenses 450,629 449,083 446,221 447,914 450,394 . Market Adjustment 0 0 1 ,693 0 0 Reserve for I nsurance Claims 0 0 597,091 591,846 173,000 Life I nsurance Premiums 106,725 110,884 99,000 99,000 53,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $7,186,767 $6,367,554 $6,894,745 $6,889,500 $7,048,009 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . · FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 14 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES INFORMATION SERVICES FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Telecommunications Transfer From: General Fund $206,064 $216,348 $226,071 $226,071 $237,375 Utility Fund 44,508 46,740 49,057 49,057 51,510 Other Funds 46,824 49,140 53,371 53,371 56,041 Sub-Total $297,396 $312,228 $328,499 $328,499 $344,926 ComDuters Transfer From: General Fund $955,068 $894,732 $939,463 $851,537 $757,862 Utility Fund 466, 190 453,876 489,500 476,560 446,434 Crime Control District 108,240 108,240 113,650 98,996 106,494 Other Funds 217,950 230,268 228,846 227,132 226,561 Sub-Total $1,747,448 $1,687,116 $1,771,459 $1,654,225 $1,537,351 Other Revenues I nterest Income $26,096 $24,014 $20,355 $5,285 $6,920 Transmitter Lease 63,373 75,615 56,590 75,000 75,000 Other Income 15,150 18,444 9,000 9,000 9,000 Transfer From Utility Fund Reserve 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances ° ° ° 153,804 0 Sub-Total $279,619 $293,073 $260,945 $418,089 $265,920 TOTAL REVENUES $2,324,463 $2,292,417 $2,360,903 $2,400,813 $2,148,197 EXPENDITURES ODeratina General Services $174,488 $169,709 $185,593 $184,713 $188,406 Major Computer Systems 289,426 275,610 261,773 260,173 294,781 Microcomputer Systems 679,663 535,735 518,385 466,182 473,848 Telecommunications 235,557 216,199 315,078 296,548 284,251 Data Network 201,345 234,143 498,927 503,537 410,322 GIS System 129,461 125,603 177,084 177,084 215,532 Public Safety 206,012 234,652 259,066 218,505 216,628 Sub-Total $1,915,952 $1,791,651 $2,215,906 $2,106,742 $2,083,768 Other & Reserves Debt Service $219,965 $0 $0 $0 $0 Market Adjustment ° ° 4,730 ° ° Other 1,570 ° 5,553 5,553 7,968 Reserve for Systems Improvements 186,976 500,762 134,714 134,714 56,461 Sub-Total $408,511 $500,762 $144,997 $140,267 $64,429 Previous Year Encumbrances $153,804 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,324,463 $2,292,413 $2,360,903 $2,400,813 $2,148,197 BALANCE $0 $4 $0 $0 $0 · · FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 15 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES · PROMOTIONAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Occupancy Tax Proceeds $195,408 $172, 198 $210,000 $174,900 $174,900 I nterest Income 4,362 3,374 2,000 3,700 2,275 Other Income 1 ,604 360 600 100 100 Appropriation of Fund Balance 4,576 56, 111 48,823 82,723 56,138 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 1,000 0 TOTAL REVENUES $205,950 $232,043 $261,423 $262,423 $233,413 EXPENDITURES Economic Development $205,752 $232,043 $260,660 $260,660 $233,217 Market Adjustment 0 0 580 580 0 Non-Departmental 198 0 183 183 196 Sub-Total $205,950 $232,043 $261,423 $261,423 $233,413 Previous Year Encumbrances 1 ,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $205,950 $232,043 $261,423 $262,423 $233,413 · BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 · .. FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 16 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES DONATIONS FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Contributions - NRH Water Bills $133,631 $126,415 $121,910 $115,410 $126,000 Contributions - Shelter Fund 13,027 7,487 9,376 12,017 15,500 Donations - Spay/Neuter 5,139 12,159 8,000 1,600 1 ,000 Donations - Trinity Waste 15,000 15,000 25,000 15,000 15,000 Donations - Teen Court ° 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Donations - Family 4th 36, 195 870 5,500 5,500 5,500 Critter Connection 2,371 2,278 2,060 3,000 3,080 Library Book Sale Proceeds 3,236 2,065 5,000 3,000 3,000 Coffee Bar Proceeds 550 1,400 2,700 2,700 2,700 I nterest Income 11 ,964 7,065 6,600 8,000 5,500 Appropriation - Humane Svc Exp. 10,000 465,914 60,000 60,000 0 Appropriation - Library Materials ° 0 1 0,000 10,000 0 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances 0 0 0 7,810 ° Other Income 20,309 14,053 11,600 67,210 11,700 TOTAL REVENUES $251,422 $656,706 $269,746 $313,247 $190,980 EXPENDITURES . Library $55,166 $52,437 $70,000 $70,000 $60,000 Humane Services 0 0 0 ° 0 Critter Connection 30,452 20,603 8,286 8,286 7,697 Keep NRH Beautiful 4,802 2,386 15,000 22,705 14,893 Teen Court ° 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Humane Services Capital Project 10,000 465,914 60,000 60,000 ° Special Events and Arts 76,721 5,000 31,500 31,500 31,500 Sub-Total $177,141 $548,340 $186,786 $194,491 $116,090 Previous Year Encumbrances $7,810 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $177,141 $548,340 $186,786 $202,301 $116,090 BALANCE $74,281 $108,366 $82,960 $110,946 $74,890 . · FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 17 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Federal Forfeited Funds $6, 129 $32,903 $12,500 $25,000 $20,000 State Forfeited Funds 25,968 11 ,894 22,500 35,000 20,000 Municipal Forfeitures 1 ,777 2,272 1 ,000 1,000 1 ,000 MDT Reimbursements 93,870 65,945 29,981 27,825 27,825 AFIS Reimbursements 12,156 12, 157 12, 156 12,157 12, 157 Radio System Reimbursements 249,468 236,603 255,791 301,340 325,000 I nterest Income 6,752 5,680 3,600 6,000 3,650 Contribution from CCD 57,849 55,077 52,665 52,665 0 Other Income 3,432 5,997 1 ,200 700 700 Appropriation - PY Encumbrances· 2,600 Appropriation of Fund Balance 16,639 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $474,040 $428,528 $391,393 $464,287 $410,332 EXPENDITURES Forfeited Funds $87,526 $25,721 $13,000 $15,600 $13,200 MDT Maintenance & Equipment 74,079 55,613 27,825 27,825 27,825 Radio Maintenance 209,586 277,041 284,000 284,000 325,000 AFIS Maintenance & Equipment 1 0,669 9,823 12,158 12,158 12, 158 Locally Seized Funds 24,116 5,253 0 0 0 Loan Payment 57,849 55,077 52,665 52,665 0 Other 10,215 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $474,040 $428,528 $389,648 $392,248 $378,183 BALANCE $0 $0 $1,745 $72,039 $32,149 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 18 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 Beginning Balance $230,650 $209,140 $239,076 $271,232 $336,165 REVENUES Drainage Fees $771,431 $793,415 $775,000 $793,000 $793,000 Interest Income 2,876 2,678 3,000 2,700 1,635 TOTAL REVENUES $774,307 $796,093 $778,000 $795,700 $794,635 EXPENDITURES Debt Service $794,292 $732,414 $730,767 $730,767 $711,368 Other Expenditures 1,525 1,587 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $795,817 $734,001 $730,767 $730,767 $711,368 BALANCE $209,140 $271,232 $286,309 $336,165 $419,432 . ., FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 19 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES . PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Sales Tax $4,041,389 $4,107,934 $4,061,595 $3,922,718 $3,861,112 I nterest Income 111 ,664 71,415 62,200 97,000 86,000 Youth Assn. Maintenance Fees 27,741 28,798 28,000 28,000 28,500 Tennis Center Revenue 332,611 289,375 327,510 292,250 310,750 Other Income 252,505 132,296 0 ° ° Appropriation - PY Encumbrances ° ° 0 19,090 ° TOTAL REVENUES $4,765,910 $4,629,818 $4,479,305 $4,359,058 $4,286,362 EXPENDITURES ODeratina Park Facilities Development Admin. $373,052 $413,202 $403,678 $376,764 $494,435 Parks & Public Grounds 717,195 897,424 1,214,910 1,263,447 1,310,632 Tennis Center Operations 456,325 435,514 484,099 477,345 491,085 Sub-Total $1,546,572 $1,746,140 $2,102,687 $2,117,556 $2,296,152 Other & Reserves . Debt Service - Revenue Bonds $1,155,840 $1,151,008 $1,143,171 $1,143,171 $1,002,823 Debt Service - CO's 227,072 218,744 212,196 212,196 205,425 Indirect Costs 230,076 241,582 253,659 253,659 261,269 Market Adjustment ° ° 4,100 ° ° Non-Departmental 3,605 ° 12,859 12,859 13,450 Economic Development ° ° 250,000 250,000 193,056 Reserve for Capital Projects 1,602,745 1,272,344 500,633 350,527 314,187 Sub-Total $3,219,338 $2,883,678 $2,376,618 $2,222,412 $1,990,210 Previous Year Encumbrances 19,090 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,765,91 ° $4,629,818 $4,479,305 $4,359,058 $4,286,362 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . It t NRH ()f¡¡c.r of thE Ci1)1 tV'!2!ìage; .~--q:t-I' \/ f-) I--~ 1""' ("'fF{ rf'f-_!lJ f; T l~ 1--1 1- ,-,- ..t "It ___'..;'.... _ J., ~'--____ J'\J r ') 1 J 111 July 29, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Crime Control & Prevention District Board of Directors City of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas The Crime Control and Prevention District was originally approved by voters in February 1996 establishing the district for five years. The voters approved a district Board of Directors that is made up of seven City Council members. A continuation referendum was held on May 5, 2001, re-authorizing the District for 10 years. Continuation of the collection of a half-cent sales tax was approved as the funding mechanism by which the City would provide improved Police services to the citizens of North Richland Hills. Goals and Strategies of the District include: 1. . 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduce response time to calls for service; Reduce occurrence of call stacking; Increase officer visibility; Enhance crime-fighting tools through new equipment and updated technology; Reduce gang-related activity. To accomplish these goals the following resources were provided: 1. Ad"dition of sworn and support personnel; 2. Upgrading of compensation plan to retain and attract highly qualified police personnel; 3. New Equipment - vehicles and computers; 4. Necessary training and other operating costs. When the District was implemented, the District Board and the City Council indicated that future increases in operating expenses for the Police Department and any additional programs or services would be paid by the Crime Control District so that improved Police services would not adversely impact the property tax rate. . In July of 1996, the District began collecting sales tax. At that time a Transition Reserve was established to lessen the impact in the event the continuation referendum did not pass in 2001. The City will continue with the Transition Fund as a reserve for operations P.CJ. Box B20ßCJ~~ t~o¡ih ¡~\¡chI2;,¡d ¡. -:ïH~, ·¡C):,·;~ ,~ ibí e~~" OGOS;, "/?,ri\ '·\Hil-IE:,::,~,'l L ()C¡! L~:¡; t:"j":) ·~~'7·(;()(ì:":: '; ¡ (h'¡-¡ <~(~:.I:~:U·í6 ~ . in the event that the District is not reauthorized in 2011. The estimated accumulated Reserve for Transition as of September 30, 2005 will be approximately $2.4 million. Original sales tax projections estimated collections of approximately $3.5 million annually. Based on these projections, by the end of fiscal year 2005 the District should have collected approximately $32.4 million in sales taxes. Based on actual collections in fiscal years 1996 through 2004 and projected collections for fiscal year 2005, total estimated collections as of September 30, 2005 would be approximately $35.2 million. ACCOMPLISHMENTS Since July 1996, many positive results have been realized In answer to the goals established by the District. · The department responded to 120,711 calls for service in fiscal year 2004 as compared to 91 ,291 calls for service in fiscal year 1996, a 32% increase. · Total arrests in 2004 were up from 1996 by 1,975, a 62% increase. · Total charges in 2004 were up from 1996 by 5,797, a 72% increase. · During 2004, Part I Crimes have decreased 2.6% over 2003. . · Total violations issued were up by 9% from 1996 through 2004. · Average response times for priority 1 calls have decreased by 4 minutes and 33 seconds from 1996 through June 30, 2005. · During 2004 case clearance rates were 33.6% for all crimes combined. RESOURCES ADDED TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO DATE Because of the Crime Control District, the City has been able to add resources for police services since 1996 in the following areas: 1 . $17.5 million to pay for salaries and benefits for 45 new police personnel, including 27 police officers, two detectives, 16 support personnel, and an upgraded compensation plan for all sworn police personnel. 2. Funding for a new $1.8 million Public Safety Computer System ($1.1 million funded by C.C.D.). 3. Approximately $300,000 for other capital projects such as renovations of the dispatch area and improvements to the Police Property and Evidence Project. . 4. Funding in the amount of $1.3 million for 25 new vehicles and 12 refurbished vehicles. II . 5. . . I' Contributed over $900,000 to the city vehicle replacement plan. 6. Funding of $93,000 for radios and crime scene equipment. 2005/2006 PROPOSED BUDGET The 2005/2006 Crime Control and Prevention District budget provides for the continuation of the upgraded compensation plan and salaries and benefits, supplies, training, equipment maintenance for 45 police personnel including 27 police officers, two detectives and 16 support staff. Given the current state of the economy and the decline in sales tax revenues, there are no new programs proposed in the 2005/2006 Crime Control and Prevention District Budget. ;Tfªi}sítibil"Eynd It is recommended that the CCD Transition Fund remain intact over the ten-year life of the District. The goal is to add to the fund so that a balance of approximately $3.4 million or two-thirds of projected operations for one year is available at the end of the ten-year referendum period. In fiscal year 2001, the City Council established a policy that the Transition Fund not be used to supplement on-going operations, but may be borrowed from time to time to pay for one-time purchases of capital items. Given the continued decline in sales tax revenues, there is a need to utilize the Transition Reserve Fund to assist with operations in 2005/2006. To this end we will deviate from this policy with the understanding the Transition Fund will be replenished as the economy improves. We believe that this reflects prudent use of these funds. Through prudent management of budget expenditures, the revised 2004/2005 CCD budget includes a decrease in the loan of $82,236. The City Council approved a loan from the Transition Fund in the current year budget of $855,949. The decrease in the loan from the Transition Fund to assist with operations was possible because of salary savings from position vacancies. Againt using the Transition Fund to assist with operations is an exception to the policy established by the City Council that will not be continued as the economy improves; however, deviation from this policy is necessary because of the economic downturn. As this is a loan, the Transition Fund will be replenished in the future so the long term funding goal is not jeopardized. SUMMARY Many accomplishments have been achieved with the addition of the half-cent sales tax for the Crime Control and Prevention District. Improvements have been made in handling criminal and other police service increases. Positive impacts have been made in response times, and reductions of burglaries and auto thefts have resulted. A state of III . . . 1" the art computer system has been acquired and installed to provide officers the ability to respond, conduct investigations and communications, and retrieve critical information in a more timely and efficient manner. A significant improvement in our compensation plan was provided through this funding that has not only helped retain quality police professionals, but also to attract quality personnel. The establishment of a Transition Fund, projected at $2.4 million in 2005, will provide a sound financial basis in future planning. A ten-year plan has been established that includes provisions for the salary plan, and funds for vehicle replacement over the next ten years. The projected balance of the transition fund at the end of the ten year referendum is estimated to be approximately $3.4 million. We are optimistic that sales tax revenues will rebound in the future, thus allowing us to rebuild the transition reserve closer to the level of our goal of 2/3 of annual expenditures. We estimate sales tax numbers to be down slightly in the coming year, and will monitor collections closely adjusting the CCO budget as appropriate. For the coming year, the following ongoing efforts to continue originally stated goals are recommended: · Comprehensive Evaluation of Crime Control District Mission, Accomplishments, Operations and Programs; · Planning for Future Needs; · Fleet Assessment; We appreciate the opportunity that the voters have given us to continue this Crime Control and Prevention District program. You have entrusted us to be good stewards of these funds, and use them in the most cost effective manner to accomplish the Goals of the City Council. We look forward to working with you in the coming years to make this the most successful program possible. Respectfully submitted, L~n~~~~ City Manager IV 1" FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 20 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Sales Tax $3,801,563 $4,153,671 $3,888,138 $3,768,849 $3,709,661 Interest Income 102,047 51,444 48,925 60,000 35,000 Other Income 7,907 20,970 0 0 0 Appropriation Trans Fund-Equip 0 0 100,000 100,000 0 Loan from Transition Fund 749,911 119,335 855,949 773,713 957,972 TOTAL REVENUES $4,661,428 $4,345,420 $4,893,012 $4,702,562 $4,702,633 EXPENDITURES Ooeratina Administration $7, 164 $7,212 $7,578 $6,739 $7,222 Administrative Services 484,254 488,898 515,929 518,410 535, 138 Investigations 267,965 255,774 280,895 281 , 133 285,407 Uniform Patrol 1 ,544, 111 1,489,898 1 ,781 ,040 1,597,957 1 ,828,267 Technical Services 207,383 214,803 242,646 241,554 246,295 Detention Services 250,516 258,024 296,954 296,114 298,017 Property Evidence 43,282 44,085 52,581 52,262 54,279 Communications 11 ,037 11 ,254 12,056 10,712 11,797 Transfer to Equipment Services 350,000 0 100,000 100,000 25,000 Sub-Total $3,165,712 $2,769,948 $3,289,679 $3,104,881 $3,291,422 Other & Reserves I ndirect Costs $382,802 $401,940 $401,941 $401,941 $300,000 Police Dept. Salary Increases-General 1,037,086 1,103,460 1 ,092,425 1,092,425 1,037,804 Child Advocacy Center 14,995 14,995 16,590 16,590 16,590 Reserve for Transition 0 0 0 0 0 Reserve for Computer System 0 0 0 0 0 Special Investigation Loan 57,849 55,077 52,665 52,665 0 Other 2,984 0 34,060 34,060 42,046 Market Adjustment 0 0 5,652 0 0 Lump Sum Merit 0 0 0 0 14,771 Sub-Total $1,495,716 $1,575,472 $1,603,333 $1,597,681 $1,411,211 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $4,661,428 $4,345,420 $4,893,012 $4,702,562 $4,702,633 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 · · · ,. July 29, 2005 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas The proposed Capital Projects Budget for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 is submitted herein. This budget identifies major projects and items not included directly in the Annual Operating Budget. The Capital Projects Budget provides for major long-life equipment used in daily operations, and funding for the construction and renovation of major facilities and infrastructure. Primary sources of funding for these projects are: General Obligation Bonds, Certificates of Obligation, Transfers from Operating Funds, Permanent Street Maintenance Capital Funds, Park and Recreation half-cent Sales Tax Funds, Capital Reserve Funds, and Federal and State grants. The proposed Capital Projects Budget for 2005/2006 totals $21.328.243. This budget contains new and continuing projects in all areas of City operations. Some projects were selected following City Council budget discussions, others were authorized by voters during past bond elections, and still others were identified by City departmental evaluation and examination of needs. Citizens voted to approve a bond package for City infrastructure/facility improvements valued at approximately $37.2 million in February 2003. Debt issuance proposed for 2005/2006 is $14,495,000, comprising $3,095,000 in general obligation bonds and $11,400,000 in certificates of obligation. General obligation bonds will be used for continuing projects that require additional funding in 2005/2006, new projects that will begin in 2005/2006, and to reimburse the reserves that were used to pay for projects originally funded from the 2004/2005 general obligation bond sale. Per the reimbursement resolution passed on April 11, 2005, the City Council approved the use of reserve funds to pay for projects that were to have been funded through the postponed 2004/2005 bond sale, with the understanding that these reserves would be restored in the 2005/2006 general obligation bond sale. The general obligation bond funding for continuing and new projects is $1,950,000. These projects include Rufe Snow Drive (Mid-Cities Boulevard to Hightower Drive), the Davis Boulevard/Mid-Cities Boulevard Intersection, the Holiday/Chapman/Meadow Signalization, and Simmons Drive (Mid-Cities to New Library). The reimbursement amount is $1,145,000, consisting of $195,000 for street projects, $200,000 for drainage projects, and $750,000 for facilities projects. Combined, general obligation bond funding comes to $3,095,000. · · · .. Certificates of obligation will be issued for $11,400,000. Of this, $1,095,000 will fund the Catering Building, First Phase Attraction, and Group Pavilion Areas at NRH20. Additionally, $1,555,000 will fund the replacement of an aerial ladder truck, an ambulance for the Fire Department, and various golf equipment and heavy machinery like a backhoe, rubber tire roller, and dump trucks. Certificates of obligation in the amount of $8,750,000 will also be issued for the Central NRH Library, a Tax Increment Finance District #2 project. The City Council has recognized the importance of dedicating funds on an annual basis to enhance the City's efforts for the major repair and preventive maintenance of City streets by authorizing the creation of a Permanent Street Maintenance Fund. With over 213 miles of streets and their aging, it is important to conduct preventive maintenance that will delay more costly street reconstruction and extend the life of the current street system. The proposed 2005/2006 level of fundina is $600.000. These funds will allow us to improve the overall condition of approximately 60 streets to include complete resurfacing of 14 lane miles. The City Council also recognizes the importance of dedicating funds on an annual basis to improve City sidewalks. This project constructs new sidewalks in high pedestrian areas of the City. The proposed 2005/2006 level of funding for this project is $50,000, and the source of funding is previously approved allocations from the General Fund "pay-as-you-go" Capital Projects Reserve. The Reserve for Capital Projects was established by the City Council in 1998/1999 as a "pay- as-you-go" way to address smaller capital improvement needs. It has collected approximately $3.1 million since inception. The proposed 2005/2006 addition to this reserve is $100.000. Staff has updated the ten-year Equipment Replacement and Building Services Plan, which City Council approved in 1996/1997. The Building Services Pay-as-you-go Plan estimates over $22 million in expenditures over the next ten years for building services operations and capital maintenance to protect our investment in City facilities. The Equipment Services Plan estimates the replacement of $17.4 million in equipment and another $18.5 million for equipment maintenance over the next ten years. Of this $36 million total, $27.5 million is proposed to be pay-as-you-go. The City Council has shown its commitment to this community by continuing to ensure the maintenance and appearance of our City facilities. I want to thank Council for their efforts to communicate to management their priorities for the capital budget. City staff will continue to monitor the condition of all our infrastructure and facilities and make recommendations based on needs and available resources in the Annual Capital Projects Budget. Respectfully submitted, Larry J. Cunningham City Manager LJC/dc i i . . . Proaram Street & Sidewalk Projects Drainage Projects Utility Projects Parks & Recreation Projects Aquatic Park Projects Municipal Facility Projects Summary of Project Expenditures 2005/2006 Capital Improvement Program Project :::Þ~ÓpQ$~ct:::: Estimated Remaining Total To Date ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2006/2007 Amount EXDenditures $7,284,776 :::$~~~~~~$9::: $4,246,000 $31,329,500 $48,729,226 3,062,640 :::~~!~~7~~~9::: 170,000 2,570,000 8,740,000 835,500 ::::: :1: ~11?:,~Øq:: 4,337,592 57,559,742 64,504,834 3,629,283 :::: :~;~~?~:~~~::: 2,542,774 10,991,919 21,516,115 28,900 ::::: :~: ~?~~~:~Þ9::: 700,000 500,000 2,445,000 722,500 ~: ~: ~ :~: ;~þt~~~9~: ~ 6,080,000 27,375,000 35,984,750 715,250 ::::: ~~:1:~1 :,:~øq::: ° ° 2,836,640 1,218,162 ::::: :~: ;4P3~Q$4::: 1,144,593 1,190,800 4,806,609 Major Capital Equipment Program CIP Personnel :T~~I: ~J~ :~~~j~~: ~~þ~~~¡~~~~~:::::::::::::::::::: $1:1~49~l~()11::::::: $2:1~3i8~~43::::::::: :$:t9~2:20;9$$:::::::: :$:1: 3~ ~$1:6~9$1::::::::::::: $1 :$9~$$~;1:14::: Summary of Project Funding 2005/2006 Capital Improvement Program · Funding To Date STREET & SIDEWALK PROJECTS G.O. Bonds, Future Issuance G.O. Bonds, Existing Funds Certificates of Obligation, Future Issuance Certificates of Obligation, Existing Funds Project Savings Reserve General Fund Reserve Pay-as-you-go Reserve for CI P Grant Funds Sales Tax Funding Intergovernmental $0 5,116,943 o 1,676,632 359,229 195,000 169,755 3,108,400 57,767 o :::::~~~p~~~::::: 2005/2006 · .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . · .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. · .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . · . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . .. .. · . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . .. . · . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . · .. . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . · . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . · .. . .. . . . .. . .. . . . .. . · . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . .. . ::::: $?~:~:~$;ØQÞ::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: · . . .. . . . . . .. . I . .. . ::}/~:;~~: :::::::::::::::::::::::::ò::: ::::::: :ø~~~ :$;ØQþ::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: · . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . ::::::::::: :225~OOÓ::: · .. . .. . .. . . .. . . . . .. . · . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. · .. . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . .. · .. . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . .. . · .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . . . $10,683,726 ::::: $9:,650;000::: · . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. · . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . .. . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . DRAINAGE PROJECTS G.O. Bonds, Future Issuance ('03 Program) $0 G.O. Bonds, Existing Funds 3,040,000 General Fund Reserve 3,200,000 $6,240,000 UTILITY PROJECTS Certificates of Obligation $60,000 Utility Operations for Capital Projects 100,000 · Project Savings Reserve 2,070,000 Grant Funds 300,000 Other 630,000 $3,160,000 PARKS & RECREATION PROJECTS Park Development Sales Tax $3,992,175 Park Revenue Bonds, Existing Funds 50,000 Certificates of Obligation, Existing Funds 790,000 Grant Funds 1,804,549 $6,636,724 AQUATIC PARK PROJECTS Expansion Reserve $225,000 I nfrastructu re Reserve 0 Certificates of Obligation 0 $225,000 MUNICIPAL FACiliTY PROJECTS Permanent Building Maintenance Reserve $0 G.O. Bonds, Future Issuance ('03 Program) 0 Pay-as-you-go Reserve for CI P 37,500 Tax Increment Financing Dist. #2 (C.O.'s) 1,450,000 · Other 535,914 $2,023,414 · . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . · . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . · .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . · . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :::::::: :$200~OOO::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: ::::::: ~: ~{~~~~~þ~j~ · . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . .. . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. · . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. · . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ···'···'··········'····$'0·'·· :-:-:-:-:-:«':-:-:-:. .:- · . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . · . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. · . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . · . . .. .. .. . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · .. . . . .. . .. . . . . .. .. · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . .. . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . · . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . · .. . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . .. .. ··'····'···'·········'$0·· ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~Q¡QQp~ ~ ~ ::::::::::: 64~;oøÒ::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: · . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . · .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. · . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . · . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . · . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . ::::: $ ~ ~Oß~; ØQq::: .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . · . . . . .. .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. · . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. · . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . · . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. . . · . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . · . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . · . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . · . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . · . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . · . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ::::: $ {:~3~;4~¿::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::Q::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: ::::::::::: :868 ;01:0:: · .. . .. . .. . . . .. .. . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . I .. . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . · . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ::::::: :2~~ÖØ;442::: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . · . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . · . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . .. · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . · . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ::::::: :($225;000): :}{~~;~g: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ::::::::1 ~Ø20;Q:OO::: · . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . · . . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. · . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . · . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. · . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. . . .. · . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . ¡::::¡:~~~~;!g) ::::::: :8~750;OOÒ::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: · . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . · . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . · . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . · . .. .. . . . . . .. . .. .. . .. ::::: $9~:59ji25Ö::: Estimated 2006/2007 Remaining Amount T atal Funds $2,486,000 $22,119,000 $26,750,000 0 0 5,116,943 0 1,260,000 1,260,000 0 0 1,676,632 0 0 819,229 0 0 400,000 0 0 169,755 1,100,000 1,430,500 12,253,900 0 0 57,767 0 0 225,000 $3,586,000 $24,809,500 $48,729,226 $0 o o $2,500,000 o o $2,700,000 3,040,000 3,000,000 $0 $2,500,000 $8,740,000 $1,900,000 $41,211,274 $43,171,274 0 0 520,000 0 0 2,715,000 0 0 300,000 1,461,174 15,707,386 17,798,560 $3,361,174 $56,918,660 $64,504,834 $167,693 $9,800,000 $15,292,300 0 0 50,000 0 0 790,000 1,973,918 737,338 5,383,815 $2, 141 ,611 $10,537,338 $21,516,115 $0 o 700,000 $700,000 $500,000 o o $500,000 150,000 1,795,000 $500,000 $2,445,000 $0 $0 $134,750 0 1,300,000 2,050,000 0 0 0 0 20,800,000 31,000,000 904,086 1,360,000 2,800,000 $904,086 $23,460,000 $35,984,750 . . . MAJOR CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PROGRAM Certificates of Obligation General Fund Pay-as-you-go Reserve Equipment Services Reserve Information Services Reserve Court Technology Revenue Funds Reserve CIP PERSONNEL Utility Funds for Operations TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM G.O. Bonds, Future Issuance G.O. Bonds, Existing Funds Certificates of Obligation, Future Issuance Certificates of Obligation, Existing Funds Park Development Sales Tax Utility Operations for Capital Projects Reserves Grant Funds Other Funding To Date $0 o o 1,069,300 49,200 :::: :~~~p~~~::::: Estimated 2005/2006 2006/2007 · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ::::: $1 ~~$~;2$ø::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::6:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::0::: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ...... ·1·r:::À ·85'" O· '.' -:-:.:-:-:-: :\N; :-: :::::::::::::::::::::::::ò::: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,118,500 :::::$1:,:7~8;140::: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . · . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . · . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. .. . · .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. · . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . · .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . . .. $1,218,162 ::::~~7:~?~;~~~< · . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . . .. $1,218,162 ::::$1:,253;G54::: .. . . .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. . · .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . $0 8,156,943 o 3,976,632 4,049,942 100,000 7,374,984 5,212,949 2,434,076 · .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . .. · .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . · . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . · .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . . · .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . . . · .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . . . .. . .. . . .. .. . . .. . .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. . . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . · . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . ::::$~~Q~:~;~q:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::0: · . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . . . . :::: :1: ~ ~:~~i ?$p:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::ö:: .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. . : : : : :: : i :,:332; 432: : ><.429¡Q9~ ...... ·1.297; 1QO·. :::::: :t~~ß~;P1:Q:: ::::::: i :,478;0$4:: .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . . . · .. .. . .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. · .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . · .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. · .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . $0 $0 $1,553,290 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 1,234,150 0 0 49,200 $0 $0 $2,836,640 $1,144,593 $1,144,593 $2,486,000 o 2,600,000 o 167,693 o o 3,073,918 3,509,853 Remaining Amount $1,190,800 $1,190,800 $25,919,000 o 63,271,274 o 9,800,000 o 500,000 2,167,838 18,258,186 Total Funds $4,806,609 $4,806,609 31,500,000 8,156,943 77,269,564 3,976,632 15,350,067 520,000 9,172,084 17,937,715 25,680,169 ::::: :r~~J: :~~~j~~~:~:~~~~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$~'~3()~~$~$:::::: : :$~$~ø:~;~$:: ::: ::: :$'~~$~1~~$4:::::::: :$1:~Ø;$:1:$~:~$$::::::::::: $~Ø~~~$3~1r4::: . . . . Schedule 1 2005/2006 Street & Sidewalk Capital Projects Budget Summary Map Pg. 1.0. No. Continuing Projects 1 11 Davis Blvd/Mid-Cities Blvd Intersection (TEA-21) 2 13 Davis Blvd. Lane Expansion (TEA-21) rrXDOT] 3 15 Jannie Drive (Charles St. to Rufe Snow) (CDBG) 4 17 Jerrell Street (Charles St. to Rogene St.) (CDBG) 5 19 NRH Park and Ride 6 21 N. Tarrant Pkwy. Street Imp. (Davis to City Limits) 7 23 Rufe Snow Drive (Karen to LH. 820) 8 25 Rufe Snow Street Imp (Mid-Cities to Hightower)[TEA-21] 9 27 Rufe Snow Imprvmts. (Ridgetop to High Lawn) [USP] 10 29 Rufe Snow Drive Landscape (Glenview to Karen) 11 31 Rufe Snow Drive Streetscape (IH 820 to Mid Cities Blvd) 12 33 Sign Removal Assistance Program 13 35 Signal Timing and Equipment Upgrades (2004) 14 37 Signalization (Davis Blvd. @ Shadywood) 15 39 Signalization (Mid-Cities Blvd @ Parker) 16 41 Smithfield Road (Bursey to Existing Smithfield) 17 43 Traffic Signal Light Communication System (2003) Project To Date $0 o 136,000 136,000 o 450,000 230,000 200,000 3,615,854 40,000 490,000 5,000 65,000 100,000 o o 359,155 ::::~~~p~~t!f:: : :::~~~(~Q06:: · . . . . . . . . . . . . Estimated 2006/2007 Remaining Amount Total $1,500,000 1,050,000 180,000 180,000 300,000 10,450,000 785,950 10,810,000 4,115,854 50,000 600,000 20,000 75,000 120,000 150,000 306,000 389,155 Proposed Projects ::::::::: :J:~~i:~~~~~~~~~: ~~~j~~~:::::: ::::::::: :::::::::::: :::::::::::: ::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: :S5~8i7,i)Ó9:: :::::::: :S4~138,t5.Ò:::::::: ::$3~8Ó6~OOO::::::: :S1t~)to.;ÒOO:: :::::: :$3.~~081~$59:: 18 45 Preventive Sidewalk Maintenance Projects (2006) 19 47 Preventive Street Maintenance Projects (2006) 20 49 Retrofit of Incandescent Traffic Si nal Lamps with LED 21 51 Signalization (Holiday/ChapmanlMeadow) 22 53 Simmons Drive (Mid-Cities to New Library) . . · , , . · , , ·S22Q·OOO . · . ... . ..,.,',. ,',,' .' :::::::::: :1~Q;ØÞÞ:: ::::::::: :$44;OOÖ:: :::::::::::: 4~oóó:: ::::::: ::::: $)~OÓÓ:: ::::::::1 ~ÒOO,:ÖdÒ:: ··',····'·5· 5' ·S····S· O· '. :- :- :- :- :- . ' :- :;9 :- ::::::: i ~~QO;ÓOO:: :::::::::: 500;oòéf: :::::::::::: :10:000:: :::::::::: :1:1((OÓÓ:: :::::::::::: :1:5,:oåo:: ..... ·1^·· '0' :- :- :- :- :- :-. .tI...oo :- :::::::::::: ~Q;~ÞÞ:: :::::::::::: ~;~ÞÞ:: :':':':':':':':':':':'0:' · . . . . . . . . . . . . : :: : : : : : : : : : :3Q~OOO: : $680,000 520,000 o ° 240,000 1,000,000 ° 1,000,000 o o o o ° o 60,000 306,000 o $600,000 400,000 o o o 8,000,000 o 8,310,000 o ° o o o o o o ° $0 o o o o $50,000 600,000 150,000 395,000 795,000 · , · . . · . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . .. . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · .. . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 o o o o , . , . ·$50'000 . · . . . . . · '.' .' . ',' ,....; . . :::: ::: ::: 600:000:: :::::::::: 1$$,:QQQ:: ..,. ·310" ·0' :- : -: -: . :- .. . .,.00 :- · . . .. . .... ::::::::: :e:2Q;Ooo:: $0 o ° 85,000 175,000 Future Projects ::::::::: 1~~:p:t~~~~~ :~~~j~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$Ò:::::::::: :$~ ~~~,,~QQ::::::::::::: :$~~Q~~:::::::::::::::::::::::: :$9:::::::::: :$tøøø~~~:: 23 - Briley Drive (Lariat Trail to Rufe Snow Drive) 24 - Cloyce Court (Northeast Loop 820 to Maplewood Ave) 25 - Colorado Blvd. (Harwood Rd to Grapevine Hwy) 26 - Douglas Lane (Hightower Drive to Starnes Road) 27 - Grapevine Highway Widening 28 - Grapevine Highway/Harwood Road Intersection 29 - Hightower Drive, Section C (Smithfield to Davis) 30 - Hightower Drive, Section D (Stonybrooke to Eden) 31 - Holiday Lane Street Impr., A 1 (I.H. 820 to Dick Lewis) 32 - IH 820 S. Access Imp. (Meadowlakes to R. Snow)[TXDO 33 - Mackey Drive (Briley Drive to Glenview Drive) 34 - Meadowlakes Drive Bridge (@ I.H. 820) fTXDOT] 35 - Starnes Road (Rufe Snow Drive to Crosstimbers Lane) 36 - Tabor Street (Rute Snow Drive to Steven Street) 37 - Terry Drive (Susan Lee Lane to North Richland Blvd) 38 - Trinidad Drive (Rufe Snow Drive to Holiday Lane) 39 - Yarmouth Ave (Mid-Cities Blvd to Newcastle Place) 40 - Unspecified Street Projects · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 ::::::::::::::::::::$0:: $0 $500,000 $500,000 · . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: ° 750,000 750,000 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: ° 800,000 800,000 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: ° 1,200,000 1,200,000 · . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::Ò:: ° 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: ° 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: ° 720,000 720,000 · . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::Ö:: ° 540,000 540,000 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 180,000 425,000 605,000 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: ° 645,500 645,500 · . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::Ò:: ° 620,000 620,000 · . .. ..... 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 485,000 485,000 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::(f: ° 600,000 600,000 · . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: ° 400,000 400,000 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: ° 375,000 375,000 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 1,110,000 1,110,000 · . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::ó:: 0 540,000 540,000 · . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 :::0:: 0 1,309,000 1,309,000 ::::::::: :i:~~i:~~~~~~:p;pj~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::$ø::::: ::::: :: :$9::::::::::::: :$1~Ø~Q~~::::::: :$~~~j$i~QQ:::::::: :$1~i1~~,:~QQ:: · . . . . . .. . . . . .. . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Project To Date ::::~~~p~~~::: ::: :2005(.2006::: Estimated 2006/2007 Remaining Amount Total . Com pleted Projects - Flory Street (Manor Dr to Glenview Dr) - Galway Lane (Emerald Hills Way to Park Entrance) - Lola Drive (Scott Dr to Davis Blvd) 400,000 257,767 800,000 ..·.'.·."·".·.·.'.·.0··... · . . . . . . . . .. . · . . . . . . . . .. . · . . . . . . . . .. . ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 0 · . . . . . . . . . . . . ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 0 . .. ... . · . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,000 257,767 800,000 ::::::::: :J:~~i:~~~~~~i~:~:f~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :s1~4S1â6i::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$.0::::::::::::::::::::::::: $0:::::::::::::::::::::::: :$0:::::::::: :$.; ;451~761:: * These completed projects are subject to Reimbursement Resolution No. 2005-03~~:~~:~~!~~o/ses 2005 project expenditures with proceeds from the 2006 general obligation bond sale. :::::::: ::r~~~~ :~t:~j~~~ ~~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $r~~~~rr~::::::: :$~~~~;~~::::::: :$~i~~~~QØ~:::: :$~1~:~~i~Q9:::: ::$~~~:1:~$~~~:: Project : : : ~~~i?9~~~ : : : Estimated Remaining To Date : : : 2 ÓÒ512 006 : : : 2006/2007 Amount Total Sources of Funds G.O. Bonds, Future Issuance (2003 Program) $0 :::: :$.2~1~:5.,:OOO:: $2,306,000 $21,694,000 $26,145,000 G.O. Bonds, Existing Funds (2003 Program) 2,225,000 ::::::::::::::::::::::ö:: 0 0 2,225,000 · . . . . . . . . . . . G.O. Bonds, Future Issuance (1994 Program) 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 180,000 425,000 605,000 2,523,443 · . . . . . . . . . . . . G.O. Bonds, Existing Funds (1994 Program) ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 0 2,523,443 G.O. Bonds, Existing Funds (1985 Program) 368,500 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 0 368,500 · . . . . . . . . .. . . . Certificates of Obligation, Future Issuance 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::ô:: 0 1,260,000 1,260,000 Certificates of Obligation, Existing Funds 1,676,632 :::::::::::::: ::: :::: :tf: 0 0 1,676,632 Project Savings 359,229 :::::::::: ~:1Q;OPØ:: 0 0 569,229 General Fund - Reserve for CIP 195,000 : : : : : : : : : : 205 ;ÒO(f : 0 0 400,000 Pay-as-you-go Reserve for Capital Improvements 169,755 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 0 169,755 . Permanent Sidewalk Maintenance Fund 0 :::::::::::: $((000:: 0 0 50,000 Permanent Street Maintenance Fund 0 :::::::::: 2ò.å,:(j(jÖ:: 0 0 200,000 ISTEA Grant Funds 174,720 ::::::::::::::::::::::(f: 0 0 174,720 CDBG Funds 360,000 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 0 360,000 · . . . . . . . . . . . . Urban Street Program Grant Funds 1,900,000 ::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 0 1,900,000 TEA - 21 Funding 487,000 :::::: :6~6l5;OOO:: 1,100,000 300,000 8,502,000 TXDOT Funding 186,680 ::::::::::::::::::::::ò:: 0 1,130,500 1,317,180 · . . . . . . . . . . . . Sales Tax Funding 57,767 ::::::::::::::::::::::ö:: 0 0 57,767 · . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Keller 0 ::: ::::::22:5;00ô:: 0 0 225,000 .'.'.'. ·r· t .( S ' . ,·,··'··"·'·f·'·F· . ·d' . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .'.'...'.','.','.'.'.'. . ,'····$··1··0' '6' 83"7' ·26' '...'.. ,$' g. ·6' S· ·0"0' M········$··3' . J:'·Ø6· O' '0' O· .. ·'$'2····'8·"~9'· 50, 0, ······$·4··· ,. '.' . '.. '. :::::::::: .~.~.:. .~~~~~:~ : >~~: ~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ '.;'. -::::::, ~ ,j ~,,,-::::>: ;~ ~', . ,-:::> .' ~;, ~. ;. ,', :::::: ,: 8;7:2B:;22~:: CDBG -- 3, 4 CMAQ -17 Urban Street Program -- 9 TEA-21 - 1, 2, 5, 6, 8,15 . .. .. . Schedule 2 2005/2006 Drainage Capital Projects Budget Summary . Map Pg. I.D. No. Project To Date Continuing Projects 1 59 Calloway Branch Channel Imp., Phase III (Holiday to 2 61 Channel Cleaning I Street Drainage Imp. (2003) 3 63 Channel Cleaning / Street Drainage Imp. (2004) I 4 65 Citywalk at Calloway Creek $1,062,640 100,000 50,000 350,000 ::: :~r:~P~~~~:::: ::: :2ÒÒ5/2ò06:::: Estimated 2006/2007 Remaining Amount Total $0 o o o $1,100,000 200,000 200,000 3,000,000 ::::::::::: :$31~:360:: ::::::::::: :too~ÖOO:: ::::::::::: t$()~OOQ:: ::::::: :~~Ø$Q~ÞQQ:: $0 ° o ° :::::::::: t~~i: ¢~~~i~i~: ~~~j~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$~ ~~~2~~~~:::::::::: :$~~:~~~~~~q::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $~:::::::::::::::::::::::::: :_~:::::::::: $~~~1iØ~Q9Ø::: Proposed Projects ~ No new projects introduced for 2005/Q6 II $0 I V: ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~$¿: ~ II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 II :::::::::: :T~~~: ~r:~~~~~~: :~~~~~~::::::: ~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~:::::::::::::::::::::: :$Q::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$Q::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $ø:::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$P:::::::::::::::::::::::::: $9::: $0 I $0 Future Projects 5 - Little Bear Creek (LB-1) Improvements 6 - Meadowview Estates Channel $0 I r::::::::::$O:11 o ·:·:·:·:·:,:·:·:·:,:·:,:0: .. I. ." .. $170,00~ I $70,000 2,500,000 $240,000 2,500,000 :::::::::: r~J: ~~~~~: ~~~I~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$~:::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$~::::::::::::: :$1 rø¡QQø:::::::::: :$4:~1t)iØQQ:::::::::: :$~~r~Q~øøQ::: Completed Projects o=J Holiday West Channel .....,..........",. . :::::::::: r~;: ~~~;~t~~ :~r~j~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::$~ ~$ÒO»O~:::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$0::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $0:::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$Ó:::::::::: $1 ~$OÓ~OOÓ::: II $1,500,000 I C:<~:::::::::«::þ:~11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 II * These completed projects are subject to Reimbursement Resolution No. 2005~þ~~~:~~~~~:~~~~burses 2005 project expenditures with proceeds from the 2006 general obligation bond sale. $0 I $1,500,000 :::::::::: r~~,: :~f:~~~t: ~#~::::: ~::::::::: ~::::::::::::::: ~::: ~::::::::::::::: ~::::::: ~:::::::::::::: :$~~~62~~~~:::::::::: ~~~~~~~~~~:::::::::::::: :_~ !~;~*Q:::::::::: :$~:~~t~;ø~*:::::::::: $ø~~~ø~*øø::: Sources of Funds G.O. Bonds, Future Issuance (2003 Program) G.O. Bonds, Existing Funds (2003 Program) G.O. Bonds, Existing Funds (1994 Program) G.O. Bonds, Existing Funds (1985 Program) General Fund Reserves $0 1,300,000 165,500 1,574,500 3,200,000 :::::::: :$~qQ~pqQ:: ':':':':':':':':':':':':0': . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :':':':':':':':':':':':'0:' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... ·0' :-:-:-:-:'»>:-:-:-:', :- : : (200:,QOO) $0 o o o o $2,500,000 o ° ° ° $2,700,000 1,300,000 165,500 1 ,574,500 3,000,000 :::::::::: r~~~: :~~~~~~~ :~f: :~~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $G~i4~~O~:::::: ::::::::::::: :$0::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $0:::::::::: :SiiSÓÓiQÓó:::::::::: $å~14Ó~ØOÓ::: . . . Schedule 3 2005/2006 Utility Capital Projects Budget Summary Map Pg. I.D. No. ::::~p~~4:::: : ::: 2ðOSi.200S : ::: Remaining Amount Total $1,200,000 1,000,000 300,000 100,000 800,000 230,000 $275,000 25,000 25,000 630,000 ::: ~: ~: ~: ~ :j~~~~s~~~'~~~~ ~~~~J~~~ ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:;: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:~: ~:::~::: ~: ~: ~::::::::: $~~~~~QQ:::: ~:::::::::: $~~iQQØ:: ~:::::: :$~~Q$j.;$øø:: ~::::::: :$j:;~~;Ø~Q:::: ~::::: :~;~~~ØQ~:: . . Project To Date Estimated 2006/2007 · .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. · .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 $0 ::::::::::: :$25;000:: $175,000 $1,000,000 350,000 :::::::::::::: sri :000:: 450,000 150,000 40,000 ::::::::::: :2$0; Ò()P:: 0 0 9,000 ::::::::::::: :91:ioòo:: 0 0 20,000 .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 42,500 700,000 :::::::::::::: 37 ;5UO:: 176,500 :::::::: :::::: 53;5OC>:: 0 0 175,000 ::::::::::::; þctPÞQ:: 0 0 20,000 ::::::::::::::::~;OOÒ:: 0 ° 5,000 ::::::::::::: :20;000:: 0 ° 40,000 ::::::::::: :100:000:: 430,000 0 .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . I . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . I . I . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proposed Projects 11 95 Pump Station Modifications for Emer enc Power 12 97 Small Water Main Replacement (2006) 13 99 Telemetric Water Meter Annual Maintenance (2006) 14 101 Unidirectional Flushin Pro ram 15 103 Water/Sewer Main Replacement (2006) · I . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 o o o o ::::::::::: :$7ítoaO:: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : ::::2~:$¡QQO:: : : : : ::::$Oò¡ÒOP:: : : : : ::::12Óióóo:: : : : : ::::275;000:: $0 o o o o · . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . :::::::::::f ~t~i: ~~~p~~~~ :p~~j~t~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$~::::: · . . . . . . . . $0 o o o o $70,000 $275,000 $300,000 $120,000 $275,000 $. ·g·.;.,,·,,·ftO·' ...............'.........$. O· ...........'.'.'.'..........$. ·0············$· 1· "0' ·4'0"0' ·O·n·" · , :' ~; ~ ,: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :: . :-::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ,'. ::::::::::: ,'.:? ,'. . ~-:'. ~:: · . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . ~ Map Pg. I.D. No. · Future Water Projects 16 - Amundson 1.5 MG Elevated Storage Tank 17 - Booth Calloway 2 MG Ground Storage Tank 18 - Bursey 2 MG Elevated Storage Tank 19 - College Hills 5 MG General Storage Tank 20 - College Hills Water Well Replacement 21 - Davis Blvd/Mid-Cities Utility Adjustments 22 - Douglas Lane Utility Adjustments (Hightower to Starne 23 - Grapevine Hwy Utility Adjust. (Loop 820 to Precinct Lir 24 - Hightower Dr Utility Adj., C (Smithfield-Davis) 25 - Hightower Dr Utility Adj., D (Stonybrooke Addn) 26 - Holiday Lane A1 Utility Adj., (IH 820 to Lewis) 27 - Impact Fee Update 28 - Impact Fee Update 29 - Impact Fee Update 30 - Johnson Booster Pump Station Expansion 31 - Line 1- 24" WL along Mid-Cities Blvd 32 - Line 10- Add 5 MG GST at Watauga PS 33 - Line 11- 8" WL from Davis Blvd 34 - Line 12- 8" WL from existing 24" WL in Hightower Dr 35 - Line 13- Install 3 pressure reducing stations; Hwy 377 36 - Line 14- Offsite water supply improvements 37 - Line 15- 16" WL along N. Tarrant Pkwy 38 - Line 16- 16" WL along Smithfield Rd 39 - Line 17- 16" WL Hightower south along Meadow Rd 40 - Line 18- 12" WL along Eagle Crest Dr 41 - Line 19- 16" WL from existing 16" WL along Janetta 0 42 - Line 2- 3D" WL along Mid-Cities Blvd 43 - Line 20- 12" WL from Corona Dr 44 - Line 21- 12" WL along Glenview Dr 45 - Line 22- Expand pumping capacity at Watauga PS 46 - Line 23- Miscellaneous Water Line Rehabilitation 47 - Line 24- 16" WL from Davis Blvd 48 - Line 25- Replace existing 8" WL along SH 26 49 - Line 26- Replace 12" along FM3029 50 - Line 27- New 12" WL from Precinct Line Rd 51 - Line 28- Miscellaneous Water Line Rehabilitation 52 - Line 3- 24" WL from TRA PS 53 - Line 4- 12"/16" WL along Holiday Ln 54 - Line 5- 8"/10" WL South along Amundson Dr 55 - Line 6- 12" WL south from existing 8" on Cardinal Dr 56 - Line 7- 16" WL from Mid-Cities south along Tecnol BI\ 57 - Line 8- 12" WL across Loop 820 58 - Line 9- 12" WL south from Janetta Dr along Holiday Lr 59 - Miscellaneous Water Replacement 60 - Rufe Snow Elevated Storage Tank Removal 61 - Shady Grove 2 MG Elevated Storge Tank 62 - Small Water Main Replacement 63 - Starnes .5 MG Elevated Tank 64 - Telemetric Water Meter Annual Maintenance · · Project To Date $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . :~t~Þ~~~: :~~~?~~~~~ Estimated 2006/2007 Remaining Amount $500,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 0 500,000 750,000 800,000 300,000 300,000 220,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 700,000 1,460,390 5,174,400 0 0 322,560 3,360,000 318,470 255,680 1,025,993 206,379 1,150,330 2,243,828 474,768 737,251 2,016,000 2,688,000 640,147 490,896 1,662,091 739,267 2,016,000 117,835 609,269 0 0 1,114,512 190,440 664,272 839,190 0 500,000 685,650 0 900,000 Total $500,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 100,000 500,000 750,000 800,000 300,000 300,000 220,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 700,000 1,460,390 5,174,400 163,772 163,772 322,560 3,360,000 318,470 255,680 1,025,993 206,379 1,150,330 2,243,828 474,768 737,251 2,016,000 2,688,000 640,147 490,896 1,662,091 739,267 2,016,000 117,835 609,269 904,512 521 ,136 1,114,512 190,440 664,272 1 ,115,490 150,000 500,000 946,250 400,000 1,200,000 : ~: ~: ~: ~: ~ :!~~~~: f~~~~~ :W~~r:: ~r:~)~#~~~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:~: ~:~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~::: ~: ~: ~::: ~:~:::::::::::::::::::: ::$Q:::: ~:::::::::::::::::::::: :$Q:: :::: $~;~~~~:Q~~::: ~:: :$~~~~~~~_~~:::: ~ ::$~1 ~~_~;1:1:Q::: .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. · .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . · .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. :$0: $0 :0: 0 :0: 0 :0: 0 ::::0: 1 00,000 :0: 0 :ò: 0 :0: 0 :0: 0 :p: 0 :0: 0 :0: 0 :0: 0 :0:: 0 -:-:-0:- 0 :0:: 0 :0:: 0 :9: 1 63,772 :p: 1 63,772 ::ö:: 0 ::0:: 0 :0:: 0 :::::0: 0 :ó: 0 ::::0: 0 :0: 0 :p: 0 :0: 0 :0: 0 :0: 0 :Q: 0 ::ò: 0 :0: 0 :0: 0 :p: 0 :Ö:: 0 :0:: 0 :0:: 0 :::0:: 904,51 2 :0:: 521 , 1 36 :::0:: 0 ::0:: 0 :::0: 0 ::0: 276,300 :0: 1 50,000 :0: 0 :Q: 260,600 :0: 400,000 :::0: 300,000 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ...... .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .... .... .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .... ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .... ..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .... .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ...... .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .... .... . . . . . . . . .. . ~ · Map Pg. I.D. No. Future Sewer Projects 65 - Line 1- 21" WW Relief Line along Loop 820 66 - Line 10- 24" WW Line along Richland Plaza Dr 67 - Line 11- 12" WW Line along Charles St 68 - Line 12- 15" WW Line East along Whitfield Ct 69 - Line 14- 30" WW Line along Oak Ridge Terrace 70 - Line 15- 12" WW Line East of Cummings 71 - Line 16- 12"/15" WW Line along Thornbird Rd 72 - Line 17- 15" WW Line along Jennings Dr 73 - Line 18- 12" WW Line along Diamond Loch W 74 - Line 2- Lift Station Expansion 75 - Line 3- 30" WW Relief Line along Industrial Park BI 76 - Line 4- 18" WW Line along Little Ranch Rd 77 - Line 5- 27" WW Line going north from Grapevine Hwy 78 - Line 7- 27" WW Line going north from Grapevine Hwy 79 - Line 8- Parallel 18" WW 80 - Line 9- 12" WW Line along Rumfield and Redwood 81 - Miscellaneous Sewer Line Rehabilitation 82 - Miscellaneous Sewer Line Rehabilitation 83 - Miscellaneous Sewer Line Rehabilitation · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . I . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . .. . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . Project To Date :::: ~~~~~~~:: ~: ~ :~~~~~~9~ ~: Estimated 2006/2007 Remaining Amount $0 o ° o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o $107,675 605,270 670,784 1,548,624 565,958 406,896 464,218 500,976 300,392 1,354,772 748,944 1,813,224 1,431,360 302,400 1,181,783 1,450,848 1,008,000 1,008,000 2,016,000 Total $107,675 605,270 670,784 1,548,624 565,958 406,896 464,218 500,976 300,392 1,354,772 748,944 1 ,813,224 1,431,360 302,400 1,181,783 1,450,848 1,008,000 1,008,000 2,016,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ............. ::: ~: ~:::: :r~~~~: ~~~~~~ :~~~~~:~~~j~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$Q::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$0::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $~:::::: $f7:;~~$i1:~~:::::: $~:r~4$ß~' ~4::: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. . . $0 ::::::::::::::::::::::$6 o :::::::::::::::::::::::::ò: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::():: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: .. .. ... ... o :::::::::::::::::::::::::Q:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::ò:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. .. .. o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::():: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: . ... .... o :::::::::::::::::::::::::Q:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::ò:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::Ó:: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::9:: · . . .. .. .. .. . . . .. . . .. . · .. . . . .. .. . .. .. . . . .. · . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. · . . . .. . . .. . .. . .. . . .. · . .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. . . . . .. .. . .. . . . .. . .. .. . . . .. · .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. · . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . · . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~t~~~~~ ~~j~~~: ~~~~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:::::::: :~~~~:~Qø::: ~ ~::: :$:~~tr~;QóÞ:::: ~:::: $4~~~t;~_~::: ~: :$~7i$~_~t4~::: ~:: :$$4;~Ø4~:è~4::: . . . .. . .. . . . . .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. . . .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. . .. . . """ .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .......................................................................... . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . .. . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .................................................................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. . . . .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. ... ...................................................................... .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .................................................................................. . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . · · . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. ... ................. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . · .. . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . .. · . . I . . .. . . .. .. .. . .. · . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. · .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. · . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . · . . . . . . .. . . . . . . · . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . .. . · .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . .. . .. .. . .. . .. · . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . 60,000 100,000 2,070,000 300,000 630,000 o · . . . .. .. . :::::::::::::::::::::::$Q:: ::::::::::::42Q;OOO:: ::::::::::: :64:5;000:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::à:: · .. '" . ....... : :::::::::::::::::::::: :():: : :::::::::::::::::::::::0:: $1,900,000 o o o o 1 ,461 , 174 $41,211,274 o o o o 15,707,386 43,171,274 520,000 2,715,000 300,000 630,000 17,168,560 :::: ~::::: ~t~~~: ~~~~~~~ :~~: ~~~~~~::: ~: ~::::: ~::: ~::: ~::: ~::::: ~::::::: ~:~: ~: ~::::: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:::::: :$~~:~~Q~9~Ó:::: :$~~~~~~~9Ø:::::::: ~~~~~~:~~!4::::::: $~~~~~~;~~ø:::::: :$$~:~~~~:~~~::: · .. . .. . ~ * . . . . .. .. .. · .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. · . .. . .. .. . .. . . . .. . · . . . . . .. . . . . .. . · .. .. . . . . . .. . .. . .. · . . . . . . . . .. . . . Schedule 4 2005/2006 Park and Recreation Development Fund Capital Projects Budget Summary . Map fib Ie No. Continuing Projects 1 110 Art in Public Places 2 112 Bark Park 3 114 Calloway Branch Trail Development 4 116 City Entry Sign (North Davis Blvd.) 5 118 Davis Boulevard Landscape 6 120 Goode Place Neighborhood Park (NPI- Phase II} 7 122 Graham Ranch Neighborhood Park 8 124 Holiday Heights Neighborhood Park (Zone 2) 9 126 J.B. Sandlin Park Imp. (Drainage Channel) 10 128 Land Acquisition 11 130 Linda Spurlock Playground Expansion 12 132 Little Bear Creek Neighborhood Park (NPI - Phase II) 13 134 Little Bear Creek Trail Development 14 136 Norich Park (NPI - Phase II) 15 138 North Hills Multi-Use Trail 16 140 Parks, Rec, & Open Space Master Plan Update (200': 17 142 Smithfield Neighborhood Park (Zone 9) 18 144 South Electric Trail Development 19 146 Walker's Creek Multi-Use Trail & Bike Transit Station Project To Date ::::~r~p~~~::: ::: :~~~~~~~::: Remaining Amount Total $150,000 194,282 928,000 45,000 50,000 400,000 400,000 12,000 84,210 1,402,046 75,000 400,000 2,400,000 342,233 674,144 125,000 12,000 753,600 2,108,600 ::::::::: ::r~~~ Ç;)~~~~~~g: P~j~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: :$~~~$j~~:::::::::: .~~~ø~~~~:::::::::: $~~~~~~$~:::::::::: $1:;~~~:,'$~~::::::: :.19;~$Ø~;~ø:: Estimated 2006/2007 · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . $10,009 ::::::::::::::::::::$0:: $139,991 $0 20,000 ::::::::: ::t7.~(2à2:: 0 0 207,568 :::::::::::: :6&,:4.22:: 285,216 378,794 35,000 · .....'. . , . . '1 O' OÓÒ·· 0 0 : -: -: -: -: -: -: ' ',. . . -: 0 :::::::::::: :5Ó~OOO:: 0 0 45,000 ::::::::: ::355~O(jÒ:: 0 0 0 :::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 160,000 240,000 12,000 :::::::::::::::::::::::ëf: 0 0 28,842 :::::::::::: :~~~~66:: 0 0 1,011,778 :::::::::::::::::::::::ö:: 390,268 0 453 · . . , , . 't '5' 7' 0 0 : -: -: -: -: ' :-: ,4·,:' '4 ,-: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,000 ' . , , '355'000' 0 0 · . . . . . . · '0·. ','. '0 ·'.·.."0 303,749 :::::::::: :,t:3~~2Ò:: 1,349,606 573,125 46,000 ::::::: ::: :29é~:233:: 0 0 35,922 :::::::::: :538~:222:: 100,000 0 46,875 :::::::::::: :18:,:1:25:: 0 0 12.000 :::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 0 · . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,575 :::::::::::648:,:025: : ° 0 1,663,512 ........ 'QàS' : -: ' :. : -: -:445·,. . -: 0 0 · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 $0 :::::::::: :$4$~O(jQ:: $0 $0 $45,000 21 0 :::::::::::: :15~odÒ:: 0 0 75,000 22 0 :::::::::: :550j)OO:: ° 0 550,000 23 0 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : e~i)óo: : 0 0 8,000 24 0 :::::::::::: :~~:,:Øpø:: 0 0 32,000 ::::::::::! ~~~ :~T:~~~~~~ :~~~~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: $0::::::::::::: :$.11 Ó~OOO::::::::::::::::::::::::: :10::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$0::::::::::::: :$i1Ó~OÓÓ:: Economic Development Fund Projects ~ISouth Grapevine Highway Intersection Improvements I · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . I . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . I . . . . · . . . . . . . . . .. . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 11~:~:~:~:~$~~~)~¿7:~11 $117,693 I $0 I $450,000 · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . ::::::::: :t:~~~ :~~~~~~i~: ~~~~i~~~t: ~~~~ :~~~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $ò::::::::::::: i332~~01::::::::::::: :$117~693::::::::::::::::::::::::: :50::::::::::::: :5450;000:: Future Projects 26 27 28 29 30 · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 o o o o ::::::::::::::::::::$0:: :::::::::::::::::::::::ö:: · ....... .. :::::::::::::::::::::::ö:: :::::::::::::::::::::::ò:: :::::::::::::::::::::::0:: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0 o o o o $2,500,000 2,500,000 1,550,000 2,800,000 450,000 $2,500,000 2,500,000 1,550,000 2,800,000 450,000 , , . . . . . . . . T· '. '.;';'4' 'r;. ' ·t· . . . ' . . 'p' ..". '.' . . . . . . ' , . . . . . . . , ' . ' . . . . . ' . . . . . . . " , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . " , . . . . . . ' . . , . . . , . . . , . . ' . . ~'Ì\ ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . 'S' , . . . . . . ' , . . . .' , ' . . . . . . . . . . . . "S' , . . . .' . . . . . . , ~ . . '0' A···· ·0' ........., $..~ ·8' O· "A...... '. ::::::::::'. :~~ :~~. ~~~: ,.~I?~~~::::::: :::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::':.:.:':.:.:.:.:.:.:~:.:::.:.:':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. 0:·:::':':':':':':':':':':' 0:·:::·:·:· .01',;;1;8 11.;00 :.:::.:.:. ;I; 11.;000:, · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . , . . . . . . :::::: :::: r~~~ :p:r()j~~t: C~$t$::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $:~;~:~~~~$~:::::::: :$4~:~~~~~ ~:::::::: :$~~~~i1r4:::::: $~Ø~:Ø~1:~~1:$:::::: $~1~$1 $~11:$:: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Project :~r9~~~~~: Estimated Remaining To Date :200512006 : 2006/2007 Amount Total · Sources of Funds Park Revenue Bonds, Existing Funds $50,000 ::::::::::::::::::$0: $0 $0 $50,000 Certificates of Obligation, Existing Funds 790,000 ::::::::::::::::::::ò: 0 0 790,000 . . . . . . . . . . . Sales Tax Reserve for CIP 3,992,175 :::: :i:;~~~~~~2: 167,693 9,800,000 15,292,300 ISTEA & TEA-21 Grant Funds 1,804,549 ::::::: :86å~01:Ö: 1,973,918 737,338 5,383,815 : ~~~~ :~~r:~~~ :~~: ~:~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~;~~~~:T:~4::::::: : :$~~:~QQ:,-~~:::::::: :$~~:1:41:~~1:':::::: $~Q~:~~r~~~8:::::: $~1~:~1$~11:~:: * Grant Projects (map Ld.): ISTEA - 3, 13, 15, 18 TEA-21 -- 19 · I · . . . Schedule 5 2005/2006 Aquatic Parks Capital Projects Capital Projects Budget Summary Map~ ID No. ~: ~: ~r~Ø~~~~ ~::: ::::2005/2006:::: Remaining Amount Total $300,000 800,000 :f~~i: ~~~I~~~~g: ~f.~j~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :S2á~900::::::::::::::: :$371 ~:1:ÒO:::::::::::::: $10Ò~OÓO:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $0:: ::::::::: :$1:~100;OOO:: Sources of Funds Aquatic Park Expansion Reserve Aquatic Park Infrastructure Reserve Certificates of Obligation $225,000 :::::::: ($225~OOO) ° :::::::::1:50:,000: ° ::: <1:;Ø9$~()qo: $0 ° 700,000 $500,000 o o Project To Date Estimated 2006/2007 Continuing Projects - 163 Catering Building - 164 First Phase Attraction - Strategic Plan Update $28,90~ I '»$~~6:~~~: I 700,O~~ II $~ I $695,000 50,000 100,000 :!~~~i: ~f.~~~~~f ~r:~~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $0::::::::::::::: :$845~(JÒO::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$Ò:::::::::::::::::::::::~:::: $0::::::::::::::: $84:5;000:: Future Projects 1 - 1 - IGate Area $0 II $500,000 1 :! ~~~I: fµt~r~ :p:røj~t~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $9:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$~::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$9::::::::::::::: $~~~~Q::::::::::::::: $~~;~9:: $500,000 :::::::::: :r~~~: :~~~j~*~ :~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$28;900::::::::: :$1:;21~~:100::::::::::::: $700~OOO::::::::::::: :$$00;000::::::::: $~~44$~OOO:: . Proposed Projects - 166 Group Pavilion Areas - 167 NRH20 Facility Improvements (2006) - 168 Tad Pole Train Station Upgrade §o~ ::::::::::$6:95:,000: §o ao :::::::::::::::50~OOO: 0 0 :::::<:<1:OØ~OØØ: 0 0 . $0 1 I:::::::::::::::::::: :::$0: I I 1 I $500,000 150,000 1,795,000 :T~~~: :~~~~~~: :~: ~~~~~: :~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $Z2$;O()():::: ~: :$1:~O~Q~()O()::::::::::::: :$:T:OC);OØO:::: ~:::::::: :$$()Q~QQ~::: ~::::: $Z~44$;OO():: · . ". Schedule 6 2005/2006 Municipal Facility Projects Capital Projects Budget Summary Remaining Amount o II $0 2,850,000 21,900,000 2,625,000 T ota I : T~t~~ :~~~~~~~ :~~~~~~~~~ :~~j~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :SQ:::::::::::::: :$~f34~i5ó::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$0::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$Ò:::::::::::::: :$;34~750: 01 $134,750 Financed Projects - 176 Fire Training Facility Expansion/Upgrade - 177 Central NRH Library (TI F #2) - 178 Central NRH Recreation Center (TIF #2) - 179 NRH Animal Adoption & Rescue Center Expansion $37,500 635,000 o 50,000 Map~ I D No. Project To Date :::: :~~p~~~~:::: :::: 2oosiio06::: Estimated 2006/2007 $750,000 10,200,000 21,900,000 3,000,000 : r~~J~ :~~~~~:~*~j#~~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~: ~:~:~::::::::: :$722~~OÓ::: ~::::::: $~ ~6ii;500::::::::::: $6~080~~OO::: ~:::: :$2i~375~~OO:: ~:::: ::$~:5;8~O~ÔQO: Sources of Funds Permanent Building Maintenance Fund G.O. Bonds, Future Issuance (2003 Program) Pay-as-you-go Reserve for Capital Improvements Tax Increment Financing District #2 (Certificates of Oblig Donations Fund Sales Tax Animal Control Fund Raising Campaign $0 o 37,500 1,450,000 535,914 o o Permanent Capital Maintenance Building Projects ~HVAC Replacement (2006) II o I r:::::::::::~:3: ~::~~¿::II . . , . , .. ,.' ", , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :::::::: :$712:,:500:: :::::::::: :~$$~QÓÒ:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::ó:: ::::::::::::: :25;ÒOO:: $0 5,780,000 ° 300,000 ········'··T· "'¡;;';'¡"p' ······;··'··t· ·C· ......;;~..'...'.........'..........,...............................'....................$. ·1'2' 2· "5' O· ·0·"···· "'$'1' ·8' O· ·7' '2"5' O· ..........$. ·6"0' ·8' O· "0' O· ·0'·'·····$· ·2·7..·"7· ·5"0' ·0' O· .......$. 3' 5· "9' ·84'" ·7' S· '0'" ::::::::::::,:~~..:.-:r:~~~~<.:.:~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ,:.'. : .~: , : . ,<:: :::, "'~' . : .-:~. : . ,-:<::::: ,:. ;', , . .~: , : . ,<::: .', : :~~',:, t, .'. .:::::::. , . : ;. , "'~: : :'. :: · · :::::::::$1:34:~75Q:: $0 ::::::::::::750;000:: ° ::::::::::::(37:,:500): 0 : : : : : : : :a~7ÞP;OP():: 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: ° :::::::::::::::::::::::::0:: 0 ::::::::::::::::::::::: Q: ::::::::::: $Q4:,:Qee:: $0 1,300,000 ° 20,800,000 ° 1,100,000 260,000 $134,750 2,050,000 o 31,000,000 535,914 1,100,000 1,164,086 : T~~~ :~~~r:~~~ :~f: :~~J)~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$2;O~3~41:4:::::: : :$9~:$97~~~O: :::::::::: :$$Ø4~:08&:::::: $~:~~4$O~OØO:::::: :$3$;984~:7:$O:: . . . Schedule 7 2005/2006 Major Capital Equipment Program Capital Projects Budget Summary Map f9.:. I D No. Project To Date :::: ~~~þ~~~~:::: ::: :2U05i2006:::: . . , Estimated 2006/2007 Remaining Amount T ota I Financed Public Safety Equipment - 183 HTE Direct Talk Voice Response Unit Replacement - 184 Mobile Data Computer Replacement - 185 Tiburon Public Safety Software/Hardware Upgrade $58,250 ~:~:::::~:~:~~~~~~~~: § § 332,000 :::::::::::::::20~OOO: 0 0 325,000 ::::::::::: :325~äòó: 0 0 116,500 352,000 650,000 :r~~~I: ~~~~i¢: $~f~: ~q~ip~~~t:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$~1:~~~~P::::::::::::::: :$~3~:~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$~::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$Q::::::::::: :$1:~~ 1~~~~9:: Proposed Projects 187 Aerial Ladder Truck $0 .,....'.. '$90;' 9ÒÖ' $0 $0 $901,900 - . . . . . . . ,.....,'.. . " ',., . - 188 Ambulance Replacement 0 ::::::::::: :205:,396: 0 0 205,390 - 189 Backhoe Tractor/Loader Replacement Unit 501 (2006 0 :::::::::::::: 17~OPÞ: 0 0 77,000 - 190 Dump Truck Replacement Unit 566 (2006) 0 :::::::::::::: 75~ÓbQ: 0 0 75,000 - 191 Dump Truck Replacement Unit 567 (2006) 0 :::::::::::::: 75~ÓÒO: 0 0 75,000 - 192 Roller Replacement Unit 643 (2006) 0 :::::::::::::: ~4~ØQQ: 0 0 84,000 - 193 Mobile Data Computer Replacement in Fire Apparatu 0 :::::::::::: 1e4:,:8S0: 0 0 164,850 194 Golf Course Maintenance Equipment Replacement 0 '.......'.. '1'35' riòó' 0 0 - . . . . ... . . 135,000 ,'.'. '......... ',.' . . :!~þil: P~#p$~: ~r.~ç;i$:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$Q:::::::::::: $1ii1tÚ4Ø::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$0:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: $Ó::::::::::: :$~;i~~;~4Q· : : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ t ~~( :~f:~J~~ ~ç~~~: : ~ : ~ : : : ~ : : : ~ : ~ : ~ : : : ~ : : : ~ : ~ : ~ : : : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : : : ~ : : : ~ : : : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : ~ : : : ~ : : : : : : : : :$i~ ~ ~:~$Q: : : ~: ~ :: : :$:~ ~:1:~' ~~éQ: : : : ::: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :: : : $Q: : : ~: : : :: : : :: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :$Q: ::: : :: : : :$~i$~$; $4Q:: Sources of Funds Certificates of Obligation Equipment Services Fund General Fund Pay-as-you go Reserve Information Services Reserve Court Technology Revenue Funds Reserve $0 ::::::$1:;S:S3~290: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0: o :::::::::::::::::::::::::0: 1,069,300 :::::::::::: 164~850: 49,200 ::::::::::::::::::::::0: $0 o o o o $0 o o o o $1,553,290 ° o 1,234,150 49,200 :.T.· ..D. :. ·,tà. .. '. ·.1. :. :.8.. :.0. ·.'.lI. '. ·.re.:. :.·.e. ·.·.5. '. :.:0.·.·.1.. :. F. .. .11. :. '. n. :. ·.d. :. ·.5. ..:, :. :.:.:. :. ..' :, :.:. ..' :. :. :.:. :. :.: :. :. :. :. :. :.:. :. :. :. :. :. :. :. :. :,:, :. :. :. :. :. :. :.:. :. :.:. :. :.' :. :. :. :, :. :. :, :. :. :.:. :. :. :.:: :,: :,$' .1. :~1: , :1.' ~'. :,5' .00' , .. ,. :. :. :. .... :, .$' ·1' '7' 1· ·S·· ·1'4' O· ..'...............'........ 'S' ·0·······'··········'········· '$0'" ........ .$' 2· . 'S' ·3' S· . 64· . '0" . .' .. :, : .~: :-.:. ,:, . . .:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ,:. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. , .:::::::::, . . ~ .:. . .;, ,..., : . ,.. .. . Map Page I.D. No. CIP Personnel - - General CIP Personnel - - Utility CIP Personnel - - Utility Construction Personnel Schedule 8 2004/2005 CIP Personnel Budget Summary Revised :::~fQPQ$~d::: Estimated 200412005 :::20QSi2Ò06::: 200612007 $387,706 261,485 568,971 :::::::$398~36t: ::::::::: :27ö~4St: ::::::::: :5a4~:1:tO:: $255,739 281,317 607,537 Remaining Amount $266,392 292,570 631,838 Total $1,308,224 1,105,869 2,392,516 ~ ~~~: çJP: :~~~~~~~I: :Q~_~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ :~:1~;~~ ~~1:~~:::: ~ ~ :: $1 :~~$~~954:: :: ~:::: :$~:;~:~;~~~::: ~:::::: $~ ~:~ ~ø:;~~Q:::::::::: :$~;~Q_;_ø_:: Sources of Funds Unspecified Project Savings and Interest Income Utility Reserves and Interest Income Utility Construction Crew Project Funding $387,706 280,456 550,000 ::::::$~~a~:~a?:: :::::::: :~P4~~eT: :::::::: :ßþq~QOP:: $255,739 338,854 550,000 $266,392 374,408 550,000 $1,308,224 1,298,385 2,200,000 'T' ',' ·ta'·' 't' "S' .,',',',',',',...,..'. ·f· ·F' . '...' ·d"···",',·,'··,'·'·',',·'·,'·'·',','·'·','·','·'·'···',·'·,',··'·',··',',·,'··,','··,',',',·· "$".','.','....'.,'..'.,'.'.,',..'.',..','..'.'.....'..','...',..',.,',',',.'.,',...,'...','....,'......'..'..,'.'..'....' ,'. ::" ~.'. : ::. .~~:~::~ .:. : :~t:I,..~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :$1:;218;1:62:::::: :: 1~253~0S4::::::::: :$1:;144;593:::::::::: $1~190;800:::::::::: :$4;806;609:: . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City ManaQer's Office Council Meeting Date: 8/22/05 Subject: Appoint Members to the Youth Advisory Committee Agenda Number: GN 2005-085 The Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) by-laws specify that 10 members are to be appointed for a two-year term and 6 members are be appointed for a one-year term for a total of 16 members. One of our most active members term expired this summer. The member wishes to serve another term. Sara Shive, Birdville High School, 1 year term This new appointment is in accordance with the Y AC By-laws Recommendation: Approve the Youth Advisory Committee's recommendations for the new committee member. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other I " l~, Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle Finance Director ~~ Page 1 of -L INFORMAL REPORT TO MA VOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR# 2005-110 Date: August 22, 2005 Subject: Presentation by Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited (EAGl) Regarding the Proposed Reconstruction of Greens at Iron Horse Golf Course We have asked representatives from Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, the management company under contract to operate Iron Horse Golf Course, to make a presentation on their proposed greens reconstruction project. As you know, this project is currently planned to OCcur during the summer of 2006 and all costs associated with the project have been factored in the proposed operating budget for FY 2005-2006. Those present will be Mr. Keith Hanley, Vice President of Operations, and Mr. Dale Folmar, Regional Manager, both with EAGl. Mr. Neil Schmidt, General Manager and Head Golf Professional at Iron Horse, will make the presentation spending a few minutes explaining the need for the new greens and then review the proposed prOcess and timing for the reconstruction. At the conclusion of his presentation, there will be an. opportunity for discussion or que~tions. Mr. Sch~idt and oth~rs will then return during the regular City Council meeting to again make the brief presentation for the benefit of the general public. t If you have any questions prior to the meeting please feel free to call. Respectfully submitted, ¿.(7 Richard Torres Assistant City Manager SSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, tEXAS r-'~-' ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Economic Development Council Meeting Date: 8/22/05 Subject: Consider Appointments to Economic Development Advisory Committee Agenda Number: GN 2005-086 CASE SUMMARY: In 1998 the North Richland Hills City Council created an Economic Development Advisory Committee to maintain good communications with the City's employers and receive feedback on how NRH could continue to be a catalyst for expanding our local economy. The committee meets on a quarterly or as needed basis and does not require local citizenship. All members represent the business community and come from small and large employers in service/office, manufacturing, retail, medical, banking, new car dealers, entertainment/tourism, commercial brokers and developers. Currently the Economic Development Advisory Committee has 10 members. Five committ~e members have expiring terms. RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends the following appointments to the Economic Development Advisory Committee. All recommended appointments are curre!"t members. These terms would run from 2005 to 2007. Phil Myhra Janet Golightly Jim Makens Mike Rigby Alan Young Large Service Employer Small Retailer Commercial Real Estate Financial Institution New Car Dealership Executive! UICI Owner! Golightly's Gallery Owner! The Makens Company President! Liberty Bank Owner/ Alan Young Buick Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds AvaIlable Finance Director ---1Q~ ¿'--' Department Head Signature GN 2004- New Appointments to ED Committee Page 1 of 1 , ." ~ conomlc eve opmen VISOry omml ee Advísor'y Committee Members NAME 5U5lNE55 FHONE & F AX TERM EXFRIES Laurie Dunlop Manager Phone 589-2236 August 2006 (Entertainment/Large North Hills Mall Fax 284-9730 Retail) 7624 Grapevine Highway NRH, TX. 76180 Janet Golightly Owner Phone 656-9780 August 2005 (Small Retail) Golightly's Gallery Fax 485-9762 5505 Davis Blvd. NRH, TX. 76180 Jim Makens Owner Phone 571-4114 August 2005 (Commercial Broker) The Makens Company Fax 540-1583 2300 Airport Freeway, Suite 230 Bedford I TX. 76022 Randy Moresi CEO Phone 255-11 00 August 2006 (Medical) North Hills Hospital Fax 255-1991 4401 Booth Calloway Road , NRH, TX. 76180 .~-- Phil Myhra Exec. VP-UICI Phone 255-31 00 August 2005 (Large Service) 9151 Grapevine Hwy Fax 255-8380 NRH, TX 76180 David Nelson Owner Phone 682-334-0092 August 2006 (Small Service) David Nelson, Attorney Fax 682-334-0091 5587 Davis Blvd #400 NRH, TX 76180 Dan Quinto Developer Phone 41 0-571 0 August 2006 (Developer) HomeTown NRH Fax 410-5757 1111 S. Main St. #1'11 Grapevine, TX 76051 Mike Rigby President Phone 656-0038 August 2005 (Financial Institution) Liberty Bank Fax 498-6424 5801 Davis Blvd I I NRH, TX 76180 I Linda Timmons President Phone 498-3200 August 2006 (Manufacturer) Bates Container, Inc. Fax 428-0779 6433 Davis Blvd. NRH, TX 76180 Alan Young Owner Phone 589-3300 August 2005 (New Car Dealership) Alan Young Buick Fax 589-3324 7724 N.E. Loop 820 i NRH, TX 76180 E North Richland Hills · D I t Ad · C ·tt INFORMAL REPORT TO MA VOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR# 2005-110 Date: August 22, 2005 Subject: Presentation by Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited (EAGL) Regarding the Proposed Reconstruction of Greens at Iron Horse Golf Course We have asked representatives from Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, the management company under contract to operate Iron Horse Golf Course, to make a presentation on their proposed greens reconstruction project. As you know, this project is currently planned to occur during the summer of 2006 and all costs associated with the project have been factored in the proposed operating budget for FY 2005-2006. Those present will be Mr. Keith Hanley, Vice President of Operations, and Mr. Dale Folmar, Regional Manager, both with EAGL. Mr. Neil Schmidt, General Manager and Head Golf Professional at Iron Horse, will make the presentation spending a few minutes explaining the need for the new greens and then review the proposed process and timing for the reconstruction. At the conclusion of his presentation, there will be an opportunity for discussion or questions. Mr. Schmidt and others will then return during the regular City Council meeting to again make the brief presentation for the benefit of the general public. If you have any questions prior to the meeting please feel free to call. Respectfully submitted, ¿~ Richard Torres Assistant City Manager ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS '\ -'.... INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No.IR 2005-113 *1 A Date: I Subject: August 22, 2005 Review Development Plan for the Dog Park Facility The Parks and Recreation Department is planning for the development of the dog park facility located on property purchased and incorporated into Northfield Park. A preliminary draft of the Dev'elopment Plan has been prepared by staff. The project involves the design and construction of an. "off-leash" area for dogs and includes a fenced 2 acre large dog area, a fenced 1 acre small dog area, a 33 car parking lot, associated irrigation, turf establishment and signage. The development plan includes a dog wash station and additional head-in parking along the entrance drive to the park for consideration as alternates if the budget allows. Safety rules and regulations are currently being developed by a committee composed of staff from Animal Services, Parks and Recre~tion and interested citizens. The Park and Recreation Board reviewed the proposed development plan at their August 1, 2005 meeting. After thoro'lJgh discussion, the Board recommended to forward a recommendation to City Council to consider approving the Development Plan. Upon concurrence of the Council, staff will complete the construction documents and detailed plans and specifications to solicit bids for the construction of the facility. Respectfully Submitted, !liæ' &J~ Vickie Laftice Director of Parks and Recreation ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HillS, TEXAS e e e Announcements and Information August 22,2005 Announcements· Volunteers are needed for a Keep NRH Beautiful community litter cleanup on Saturday, Sept. 17. This event is being held in conjunction with the . annual Trinity Trash Bash & Waterfest 2005. Please pre-register as soçm as possible by calling 817-427-6651. City Hall and other City Offices will be closed on Monday, September 5th, in observance of the Labor Day holiday. Garbage will be collected by Trinity Waste Services. Kudos Korner Every Council Meeting, we spotlight our employees for the great things they do. Tisha Fowler, Animal Adoption & Rescue Center A letter was received from a resident thanking Tisha for the quick response to his call for assistance when his neighbor's fence fell and a dqg got loose. The resident said it is wonderful to have people who work hard to make our city a nice place to live.