Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 2005-09-12 Agendas . · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 - 6:00 P.M. For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall - Pre-Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820. · I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION I TAKEN 1. Discuss Items from September 12, 2005 City Council Meeting (5 Minutes) Review Possible Dates for Meeting with Planning and Zoning 2. IR 2005-124 Commission Regarding North Central Texas Council of Government Center of Development Excellence (5 Minutes) 3. IR 2005-123 Update on Quad Cities DFW Foundation - Bob Hamilton, NE Chamber President (10 Minutes) 4. IR 2005-111 Presentation by William L. Haralson and Associates, Inc. on the Completion and Findings in the NRH20 Waterpark Strategic Plan (30 Minutes) 15. I Adjournment I I t1 ~f¿5 """1f Dat(? '\'t~() ó..~ ... ¢ . Time ~eta By · 09/12/05 City Council Agenda Page 1 of 4 · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 - 7:00 PM For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 817-427-6060 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. · NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation - Cub Scout Den #3 Pack 122 3. Pledge - Cub Scout Den #3 Pack 122 4. Special Presentations 5. Citizens Presentation 6. Removal of Item( s) from the Consent Agenda · 09/12/05 City Council Agenda Page 2 of 4 . . . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. Consent a. Minutes of the August 22, 2005 Council Agenda Meeting b. Minutes of the August 29, 2005 Special Council Meeting FP 2005-13 c. Consideration of a Request from Kennis Ketchum, Portfolio Development LLC, to Approve the Final Plat of The Venue at Home Town Addition (Located in the 9000 Block of Grapevine Highway - 11.49 acres) RP 2005-04 d. Consideration of a Request from Mycoskie, Mcinnis Associates on Behalf of Bates Container to Approve the Replat of Lot 11 R, Block H Smithfield Addition (Located in the 6400 Block of Smithfield Road - 2.45 acres) GN 2005-087 e. Approve Abandonment of Sanitary Sewer Easement Located in Forest Glenn West, Phase II - Ordinance No. 2844 GN 2005-088 f. Approve Abandonment of Utility Easement Located on North side of Starnes Road (approximately 200' East of Smithfield Road) - Ordinance No. 2845 Consideration of a Request from Jones & Boyd, 8. SP 2005-08 Inc. on Behalf of Arcadia Land Partners 17, Ltd., for Approval of a Site Plan for Franklin Park Senior Independent Living Facility (Located in the 8600 Block of Mid-Cities Boulevard - 7.5 acres) Consideration of a Request from Jones & Boyd, 9. FP 2005-07 Inc. on Behalf of Arcadia Land Partners 17, Ltd., to Approve the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block Q Hometown West Phase 6 Addition (Located in the 8600 Block of Mid-Cities Boulevard - 7.5 acres) Approve Abandonment of Sanitary Sewer 10. GN 2005-089 Easement located in Home Town NRH West, Phase 6 - Ordinance No. 2846 09/12/05 City Council Agenda Page 3 of 4 ,." 4 . . . v r- NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request 11 . FP 2005-12 from Ramypasha Investments, Inc. to Approve the Final Plat of Woodland Oaks Phase 2 Addition (Located in the 6700 Block of Precinct Line Road - 3.24 acres) Public Hearing and Consideration of a Request 12.ZC 2005-10 from Gordon Swift Consulting Engineers, Inc. on Behalf of West Creek Partners, LLC. for a Zoning Change from "C1" Commercial to "RI- PO" Residentiallnfill Planned Development (Located in the 8400 Block of Hightower Drive - 2.27 acres) - Ordinance No. 2847 Consideration of a Request from Graham Ranch 13. PS 2003-37 Partners, Ltd. to Approve the Vacation of the Final Plat of Graham Ranch Phase I Addition (Located in the 7000 Block of Hightower Drive - 54.7 acres) Consideration of a Request from Graham Ranch 14.FP 2005-16 Partners, Ltd., to Approve the Final Plat of Graham Ranch Phase I Addition (Located in the 7000 Block of Hightower Drive - 34.09 acres) 15. GN 2005-090 Conduct Public Hearing on Proposed Tax Rate Approve Water and Sewer Rates - Ordinance 16. GN 2005-091 No. 2848 Approve Joint Resolution with City of Richland 17. G N 2005-092 Hills for South Grapevine Highway Corridor Branding & Design Study - Resolution No. 2005-064 Approve Adoption of National Incident 18. GN 2005-093 Management System - Resolution No. 2005-065 Approve Revision to Little Bear Creek Corridor - 19.GN 2005-094 Ordinance No. 2849 20. Information and Reports - Councilwoman Compton 21. Adjournment &t ( ppSTED ~(~? Dat(? \\'~3t) ~ 09/12/05 City Council Agenda Page 4 of 4 ~ Time ~~~ By "\ l INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR2005-124 Date: September 12, 2005 Subject: Presentation by Council of Governments on Center of Development Excellence Currently the North Central Texas Council of Governments is setting up meetings with cities throughout the area to inform local officials about programs and opportunities offered through the Center of Development Excellence. The Center of Development Excellence is primarily set up to promote sustainable development and quality of life throughout the area. A description of the Center of Development Excellence is attached for your review. COG staff has requested a time that they can give a 45 minute presentation to City Council, the Planning & Zoning Commission and any other interested staff or committees. This item is b.eing brought to your attention to try to find a convenient and appropriate time for a COG presentation. City staff is rêCommending considering one of the next two regular work session dates for the Planning .& Zoning Commission. The next two work session dates are Thursday, October 6 or Thursday, November 3. They generally meet at 6:00 p.m. If there are other appropriate times, staff will be happy to accommodate the City Council. John Pitstick Development Director ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS / l' e e e NCTCOG - Center for Development Excellence About the Center .:: Mission .:: Steering Committee .:: Contact Us Issues 10 Principles Technical Tools CllDE Awards Education/Outreach Li n ks Transportation Page 1 of 1 About the Center: The number of people living in North Central Texas has grown by more than 30 percent in the last 10 years and experts predict that this trend will continue. Thi~ means that today's population of about 5.6 million people in the Dallas/Fort Won region is expected to grow to more than 9 million by 2030. This is an exciting tin as growth brings new economic and cultural opportunities, but it is also a time in which we must plan for new and unique challenges. To prepare for the road ahead, the North Central Texas Council of Governments' Strategic Plan for 1999-2003 called for the creation of the Center of Developmen Excellence. The Center is envisioned as a comprehensive effort to bring together public- and private-sector experts in the environmental, transportation, development, and information analysis fields to address the regional issues and infrastructure concerns of the future. In December 2001, NCTCOG's Executive Board appointed local government and private sector stakeholders to the Development Excellence Steering Committee-ë committee charged with advising NCTCOG regarding development issues. As its first assignment, the committee drafted a mission statement and "10 Principles ( Development Excellence" to guide the initiative. The "10 Principles" have been designed to address the many issues that will impact the region as its population grows including, but not limited to, transportation, air quality, water supply, and the environment. Mission: The mission of the Center of Development Excellence is to promote quality grow1 in North Central Texas that enhances the built environment, reduces vehicle mile of travel, uses water & energy resources effectively and efficiently, and helps advance environmental stewardship in order to ensure continued economic vitali' and provide the highest attainable quality of life for all residents. NCTCOG.ORG. Legal Dìsclaimer . North Central Texas Council of Governments. 616 Six Flags Drive P.O. Box 5888 Arlington, TX 7E 5888 Main Operator: (817) 640-3300 . Fax: (817) 640-7806 http://www.developmentexcellence.com/mission. asp 9/8/2005 INFORMAL REPORT TO MA VOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 2005-123 Date: September 12, 2005 Subject: Update on Quad Cities DFW Foundation Bob Hamilton, President of the Northeast Tarrant Chamber of Commerce, will be making a brief presentation Monday evening during the Pre-Council meeting to update the City Council on activities of Quad Cities DFW. Respectfully Submitted, 'n- I í U Larry J. unningham" City Manager ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS .' INFORMAL REPORT TO MA VOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 2005-111 Date: September 12, 2005 Subject: Presentation by William L. Haralson and Associates, Inc. on the Completion and Findings in the NRH20 Waterpark Strategic Plan Included in the 2004-05 NRH20 Capital Improvement Budget is the preparation of an update to the Strategic Plan for NRH20. The study included an examination of both the business side of the park (financial performance, marketing efforts, group sales, etc.) and the development side of the park (master plan update, attraction useful life, etc.). The goals of the study included maintaining the park's financial performance, keeping the park a positive reflection on the City and maintaining a favorable and attractive resident discount. A Request for Proposal was issued and responses were evaluated by a committee consisting of City staff. Interviews of finalists were conducted and staff then made a recommendation to the City Manager for review. A team assembled by William Haralson of William L. Haralson & Assoc., Inc. (WLHA) was selected to conduct the study. Mr. Haralson is well known throughout the waterpark industry as one of the leaders in the field of economic feasibility regarding waterparks. Mr. Haralson also prepared the original feasibility study for NRH20 waterpark in 1993. Assisting Mr. Haralson with the study were Steve Mayer from Cross Country Parks and Mark Hatchel from Kimley-Horn. Providing input in the form of a "Wise Council" were: - Errol McKoy, President of the State Fair of Texas and past Executive Vice President in the Six Flags Organization - Greg Mastriona, Executive Director of Hyland Hills Park and Recreation District (operators of the largest publicly owned waterpark, Water World) - John Seeker, Principal of Turnstile, Inc. and past Senior Vice President of Marketing for Wet 'n Wild waterpark in Orlando, Florida, Las Vegas, Nevada and Arlington, Texas - Pat Cartwright, noted waterpark operator of both Water Country USA in Williamsburg, Virginia and Emerald Pointe Waterpark in Greensboro, North Carolina Attached is an Executive Summary highlighting the major findings of the plan. Mr. Haralson will present the findings of the NRH20 Strategic Plan during the Pre-Council meeting on Monday evening. Respectfully Submitted, Ô~ ttÞ Vickie Loftice Director of Parks and Recreation ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS . . . NRH20 Family Waterpark Strategic Plan - Executive Summary September 2005 Introduction and History Included in the 2004-05 NRH20 Capital Improvement Budget is funding for the preparation of an update to the Strategic Plan for NRH20. The study included an examination of both the business side of the park (financial performance, marketing efforts, group sales, etc.) and the development side of the park (master plan update, attraction useful life, etc.). The goals of the study included maintaining the park's financial performance, keeping the park a positive reflection on the City and maintaining a favorable and attractive resident discount. A Request for Proposal was issued and responses were evaluated by a committee consisting of City staff. Finalists were interviewed and staff then made a recommendation to the City Manager for review. A team assembled by William Haralson of William L. Haralson & Assoc., Inc. (WLHA) was selected to conduct the study. Mr. Haralson is well known throughout the waterpark industry as one of the leaders in the field of economic feasibility regarding waterparks. Mr. Haralson also prepared the original feasibility study for NRH20 in 1993. Assisting Mr. Haralson on the study were Steve Mayer from Cross Country Parks and Mark Hatchel from Kimley-H'orn. Providing input in the form of a "Wise Council" were: - Errol McKoy, .President of the State Fair of Texas and past Executive Vice President in the Six Flags Organization - Greg Mastriona, Executive Director of Hyland Hills Park and Recreation District (operators of the largest publicly owned waterpark, Water World) - John Seeker, Principal of Turnstile, Inc. and past Senior Vice President of Marketing for Wet In Wild waterpark in Orlando, Florida, Las Vegas, Nevada and Arlington, Texas - Pat Cartwright, noted waterpark operator of both Water Country USA in Williamsburg, Virginia and Emerald Pointe Waterpark in Greensboro, North Carolina The following is a summary of major key topics offering a broad overview of the plan. Marketing Key Strategy Increased and targeted marketing efforts to differentiate NRH20 from the smaller aquatic parks. The study recommends that marketing efforts be concentrated in Tarrant County. Increasing competition in Dallas County coupled with low penetration rates in key ·cities throughout Tarrant County provide the opportunity to focus marketing efforts in a smaller area. Cable television is the recommended media outlet with radio being the secondary outlet. . Group Sales Key Strategy On Park Sales Key Strategy Staffing Key Strategy . Increase sales to corporate groups taking advantage of a tremendous opportunity to expand NRH20's attendance and revenue stream. The future catering building, along with the proposed new group pavilion area, will assist in attracting additional corporate groups. A reduction in the operating hours on Saturdays gives more capacity for exclusive rentals while minimizing the impact on general admission guests. Increase Food and Beverage per caps. The major challenge identified with NRH20's food and beverage program is the location of the main concessions building. Additional facilities should be identified and/or expanded to offer food service throughout the park. Merchandise and locker rental revenues are on par with other facilities. Dedicate more time and effort to the management of partnerships, creative direction, production, media buying for a more effective marketing program. The study recommends that the Marketing Specialist position be a full-time position. The position is split between NRH20 and the remaining Parks and Recreation Department. The marketing specialist should also be more involved in group sales since the study indicates group sales as a major component to achieving revenue goals. Additionally, an increase in group sales staffing is warranted to focus on corporate events. The additional group sales positions would be part-time and/or contractual, with outbound work focusing on personal sales calls. Master Plan Update Key Strategy Update the Conceptual Master Plan to accomplish three key objectives: - Keep the park fresh and attractive to current visitors. - Increase the age of the park's target market to 15 years of age and under. - Expand the opportunities for corporate group sales through the addition of a pavilion/catering area. The Master Plan specifically includes the following recommendations: · Replace the existing Aqua Express Train attraction with a new attraction. · Major development in the southwest corner of the park to include attractions designed to keep the park fresh and exciting. It is recommended that new attractions be added every few years as funding allows. · Additional picnic areas throughout the wooded area located near the Green Extreme. · The addition of barrel roll canopy seating areas on the south side of the NRH20cean (Wave Pool). · Additional bathrooms adjacent to the Hopper food and beverage location. · A renovation of the Fountain/Stream located at the front of the park. . NRH20 Strategic Plan Executive Summary 2 . . . Pricing Key Strategy Allow incremental annual increases to the historically low marquee price at NRH20. A low marquee price can lead to confusion with guests. Pricing helps to establish the identity of the park. It also helps to differentiate NRH20 from its competition. For example, Hawaiian Falls will charge $13.99 or just $4.00 less than the recommendation for NRH20 for 2005. Hurricane Harbor charges $12.00 more than the recommended price for 2005 for NRH20. Thus, based strictly on marquee rates, the uninformed person would be likely to assume that NRH20 is more similar to the Hawaiian Falls parks than to Hurricane Harbor. Based on the size and number of attractions the opposite is true. DETAILED FINDINGS Market and Financial Evaluation This section of the report includes an assessment of attendance history, guest mix, visitor surveys, market penetration, financial performance, admission rates, and per capita expenditures. Admissions · NRH20 is currently the second largest waterpark or leisure pool out of the 16 throughout the Metroplex in terms of attendance and size. · Defending NRH20 from smaller competition is primarily a marketing challenge, rather than a need for a bigger and better waterpark. · NRH20's primary service market is Northeast Tarrant County with a secondary market extending from the DFW Airport on the east to the Tarrant County line on the west, and from Interstate 20 on the south to Denton on the north. · Market penetration is relatively low. The primary market penetration is 12.7% and the secondary market penetration is 3.70/0. · The park remains profitable; however the level of profit has declined as attendance has declined. · Admission rate adjustments show an inconsistent pattern over time, and once a price adjustment is not made, the opportunity is lost to improve revenue and the park drops farther in pricing making it even more difficult to catch up. · The park's price sends a message to the public about the park's stature. Admission prices should be adjusted yearly. If price resistance is a problem, the option of discounting should be used. In-Park Soending · Typically, a commercial waterpark will generate approximately 35% of total revenue from in-park spending. NRH20 (in 2004) had 25% of total revenue accounted for from in-park spending. · Food and Beverages account for the majority of in-park spending typically at 20% to 25% of total spending. At NRH20 in 2004, food and beverage accounted for 13.30/0 of total spending. NRH20 Strategic Plan Executive Summary 3 . . . · Per capita spending is low at $1.90. A number of factors impact this with the primary factor being location of the park's main concessions area. · Merchandise and locker rentals were both within the normal range with per capita expenditures of $.42 and $.20 respectively. Goals and Guidelines for NRH~O · Set a goal of reaching 300,000 in attendance within 5 years. · Group Sales: Set a goal of reaching sales of 60,000 group sales tickets. · Admission Prices: Set a goal of escalating the park's marquee admission rate to $20.00. · In-park Spending: Goals should be set for per capita spending for food and beverage, merchandise and locker rental. · Re-format and track operating expenses. Analvsis of Attendance at NRH~O · NRH20 reached an all time high attendance level of 266,655 in 2002 before dropping to 228,656 in 2003 and 213,285 in 2004. · Principal factors for NRH20's attendance decline appear to be poor weather with an overall increase in the number of competitors in the Metroplex. · July is the most heavily attended month, followed by June, August, May and September. · During June and July, Friday outdraws Saturday and Sunday, most likely due to the park's Friday Night Dive-In Movie series. · Temperature does appear to affect attendance, as evidenced by the fact that the top 18 attendance days in 2004 had temperatures of 90 degrees or more. · General Admission daily attendance accounted. for 44.30/0 of total attendance. Resident Admission daily attendance accounted for 7.6% of total attendance. · Season Pass attendance accounted for 16.20/0 of total attendance. · Group attendance accounted for 14~60/0 of total attendance. · North Richland Hills, Fort Worth and several other nòrth Tarrant County communities have consistently accounted for roughly half of NRH20's attendance. · North Richland Hills residents have accounted for between 17.01 % of attendance in 2004 to 38.640/0 of attendance in 1995. Evaluation of Financial Performance at NRH~O · Although there have been periodic increases in admission rates at the park, these increases have been too infrequent with inadequate increments. · Per capita guest expenditures have not shown a consistent pattern of growth as indicated by the drop in 1996 as compared to 1995 and the drop from 2000 compared to 1999. · Group sales per capita expenditures increased every year through 2003, before dropping in 2004. · The largest category of in-park spending is food and beverage. Between 1995 and 2001 per capita expenditures remained mostly flat. However, from 2002 to 2004 per capita expenditures increased to $1.73 in 2002 to $1.90 to 2004. NRH20 Strategic Plan Executive Summary 4 . . . · Locker per capita expenditures have ranged between $.10 and $.22 throughout the park's history. · Merchandise per capita has exhibited no steady patterns, ranging from $.27 in 1995 to a high of $1.23 in 1998. Proiections of Attendance and Financial Performance at NRHzO · NRH20 is a complete waterpark with sufficient entertainment value and capacity. · WLHA is of the opinion that higher levels of performance at NRH20 can be achieved by: 1) focusing media markets in appropriate cable zones, 2) pursuing a moderate pricing policy for admissions and in-park spending and 3) implementing timely capital improvements, including a new signature ride, new ." catering facility, group pavilions, expanded food and beverage facilities and additional parking. · W~HA projects 2005 attendance at 226,326 up to 291 ,912 in 2009. · Price increases are recommended in all categories for each of the next five years. · A~ is true with most municipal attractions, NRH20 has always been under-priced. Currently, the park is under-priced and under-valued. · Under-pricing represents multiple problems. First, the park loses revenue with each ticket sold. Secondly, the park's marquee admission rate establishes its stature in the market place. · Pricing helps to establish the identity of the park. It also helps to differentiate NRH20 from its competition. · Marquee prices only establish the stature of a venue: it is not representative of the price of admission for most visitors because of discounting opportunities. · Typically revenue per capita from admission tickets averages between 600k and 700/0 of the marquee rate. · Nationally only a few other public water parks exist that are the same size as NRH20. · Only one park has higher attendance than NRH20 which is Water World in Federal Heights, Colorado. Water World has a marquee price of $28.95 with an admission per capita of $18.03 or 62% of admission price. · Moving some of the lockers to another location near the secondary food and beverage outlet might raise the locker and food and beverage per cap by a few cents. · Projected total guest spending per person is projected at $14.71 in 2005, increasing to $16.51 in 2007 and $18.98 in 2009. · WLHA had difficulty in assessing NRH20's operating expenses and recommends that the City consider an evaluation of accounting practices with an eye toward adopting a format for the waterpark that is more consistent with the industry. · With regards to the most recent operating budgets, it is suggested that NRH20 operate at 75% of projected revenues. · Adopting WLHA recommendations will result in positive operating income for all future years including 2005 - assuming weather, etc. NRH20 Strategic Plan Executive Summary 5 . Marketing Strategy and Recommendations Demoarachic and Marketina Research · Nearly 80% of NRH20's attendance comes from nine cable TV zones. All of the zones are primarily on the western half of the Metroplex. · NRH20's in house surveys indicate strong satisfaction for the park and very powerful existing world-of-mouth. · Rework survey to collect additional data that will further aid the marketing efforts. Comcetition · Competition is high in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. · Penetration rates in the eastern Metroplex are not significant and could be increased in the western Metroplex. · More effort should be focused on the local and western Metroplex (Fort Worth). The combination of a sizable ride mix and good location can and should be used to fully maximize NRH20. Pricing · General discount can increase to $4.00. This would be 22% off the 2005 general admission price of $17.99. · Removal of the ~ off after 5:00 p.m. is also recommended, with the exception of the Dive-In Movie series. . Operating Schedule and Opportunities · Closing earlier in the day offers an opportunity to lower expenses and increases the opportunities for exclusive group events. Promotions. Promotional Sponsors and Discounts · Minimize discounts and market them more completely. · Partner with retail or fast food partner to offer discount offers at store locations. · Focus on soft drink offer for shorter time period. · As print media is generally less effective promoting a waterpark, it is effective in promoting special events such as Dive-In Movies. · As women visit grocery stores 2.3 times per week, focus on adding a grocer to aid in the selling of pre-season season passes. . Campaian Theme and Creative Production · Focus on the "NEW" Splashatory · Focus on the main attributes of the park in all advertising: o 17 acres of cool fun, safe thrills, etc. o 14 waterslides o Wholesome, clean family entertainment o NRH20cean o Relaxing Endless River o FREE parking and tubes o Location · Communicate the scope of the park. · Promote safety, cleanliness, service and cool, exciting fun. NRH20 Strategic Plan Executive Summary 6 . . . · Highlight the value offers. · Direct guests to discount through the retail and soft drink partners. · Consider building stock footage and photo library. This should be thought of as a three to seven-year investment as the cost could reach $30,000 to $70,000. Strateaic Opportunities · Offer preferred parking and valet parking as a charge, but available to those that may enjoy the service and convenience. · Add parking near the groups area. · Add waiter service in the park. Media Buvina Strategy · A fully loaded media buy would cost in excess of $3 million. At current revenue and attendance levels, this is not feasible. · The recommendation is to focus the majority of the media buy to television, specifically cable television. · Use radio for media mix purposes as radio can be used to instigate word-of- mouth, which is outstanding for NRH20. Season Passes · Increase season passes from 6,800 passes sold in 2004 to 10,000 to 15,000 passes. · Direct mail is recommended for season pass sales. · The capture of email addresses is recommended as a very cost effective method to reach season pass holders in a timely manner. Group Sales · The park is underperforming in the area of corporate events. · Additional group sales staffing should be hired to focus on corporate events. These positions would be outbound and focus on personal sales calls. · New group areas should be added to accommodate groups. Adjacent Facility Analysis This section compares the different facilities located throughout the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex and surrounding areas. It also gives some history of the development of the waterpark industry in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. Currently there are two larger waterparks in the Metroplex, Hurricane Harbor and NRH20 Family Waterpark. There are four smaller waterparks, Denton Water Works, Hawaiian Falls Garland, Hawaiian Falls The Colony and Bahama Beach Family Water Park. The purpose of the inclusion of this section is to evaluate the location, opening date, operation hours and pricing of the various facilities throughout the area. NRH20 Strategic Plan Executive Summary 7 . . . Workshop Documentation The workshop included members of the "Wise Council" and included discussions of the findings and other ideas to better promote NRH20 Family Waterpark. Some of the key points discussed: · Based on the layout of the facility the opportunity for paid parking is available. · To better accommodate groups, a separate parking area should be added closer to the group's areas. · The more involved community leaders become with NRH20, the more effective growth opportunities are. · Consider other dry amenities to bolster the park and add additional profit centers. · Add Wi-Fi as an additional service to guests visiting the park. · Consider adding commission based group sales position(s) as park is currently understaffed. · Investigate and develop more off-season uses for the facility such as art festivals, band festivals, outdoor auto/RV/boat shows, etc. · The most pressing capital improvement need for NRH20 is an expanded groups/catering area. Conceptual Master Plan This is a conceptual master plan update showing new ride areas as well as support amenities. As discussed previously in the document, a cornerstone of the master plan is the development of a groups/catering area to be added for the 2006 Operating Season. Also planned for 2006 is the replacement of the AquaExpress interactive feature. This feature was part of the original construction of the park and has reached the end of its useful life. Future development may include: · Major development in the southwest corner of the park to include attractions designed to keep the park fresh and new to current visitors and also to expand NRH20's target market to include ages up to and including 15 years of age. · Additional picnic areas throughout the wooded area located nearby the Green Extreme. · The addition of barrel roll canopy seating areas on the south side of the NRH20cean (Wave Pool). · Additional bathrooms adjacent to the Hopper food and beverage location. · A renovation of the Fountain/Stream located at the front of the park. NRH20 Strategic Plan Executive Summary 8 , MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST . LOOP 820 - AUGUST 22, 2005 . . PRE-COUNCIL SESSION The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas met in Pre-Council session on the 22nd day of August, 2005 at 5:30 p.m. in the Pre-Council Room prior to the 7:00 regular Council meeting. Present: Oscar Trevino Tim Welch John Lewis Jo Cox Suzy Compton JoAnn Johnson Nancy Bielik David Whitson Staff Members: Larry J. Cunningham Richard Torres Ogden Bo Bass Karen Bostic Patricia Hutson George Staples Mary Edwards John Pitstick Larry Koonce Mike Curtis Jimmy Perdue Patrick Hillis Kyle Spooner Vickie Loftice Bill Thornton John Lynn Jimmy Cates Call to Order Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Managing Director Administrative/Fiscal Services City Secretary City Attorney Public Information Officer Director of Planning & Development Finance Director Public Works Director Police Chief Human Resources Director Information Services Director Park & Recreation Director Assistant Park & Recreation Director Assistant Police Chier Public Works Operations Manager Mayor Trevino called the Pre-Council meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 1. Discuss items from Reaular Auaust 22. 2005 City Council Meetina None. 2. IR 2005-109 Review Grant for Traffic Sianal Timina Plans for Rufe Snow Drive and Holidav Lane . . . City Council Minutes August 22, 2005 Page 2 Public Works Director Mike Curtis advised the Council that the Rufe Snow Drive and Holiday Lane Traffic Signal Timing Projects identified in the 2004/05 Capital Projects Budget are eligible for a program being implemented by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). NCTCOG has implemented a regional project called the Thoroughfare Assessment Program (TAP). The goal of the project is to maximize the capacity of existing roadway systems by improving traffic operations through signal timing and implementation of operational improvements along selected corridors. NCTCOG sent the City a notice advising of the opportunity to obtain a grant to fund eighty percent. Council was advised that if the City participates in the program the City would need to go through the NCTCOG process, which will delay the two signal timing projects. Council concurred with submitting the Rufe Snow Drive and Holiday Lane projects to NCTCOG for consideration. 3. IR 2005-110 Presentation bv Everareen Alliance Golf Limited Reaardina the Proposed Reconstruction of Greens at Iron Horse Golf Course Mr. Neil Schmidt, Golf Course General Manager, discussed with the Council the Golf Course Greens Resurfacing Project. Mr. Schmidt explained why the greens need to be resurfaced, the reconstruction process, different alternatives considered, and the project goals. Councilman Lewis present at 5:43 p.m. 4. IR 2005-102 Demonstration of the Parks Security Cameras Located at Green Vallev. Cross Timbers. Walkers Creek and Richfield Parks Mr. Gary Bechtold, Parks Superintendent, advised the installation of the security cameras at Cross Timbers Park, Green Valley Park, Richfield Park and Walker's Creek Park is complete. Mr. Bechtold gave a demonstration of the new park security cameras. There were no questions from the Council. 5. Adiournment Mayor Trevino adjourned the Pre-Council meeting at 6:01 p.m. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order August 22, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. . . . City Council Minutes August22,2005 Page 3 ROLL CALL Present: Oscar Trevino Tim Welch John Lewis Jo Cox Suzy Compton JoAnn Johnson David Whitson Nancy Bielik Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: Larry J. Cunningham Ogden Bo Bass Richard Torres Patricia Hutson George Staples City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney 2. INVOCA TION Councilwoman Compton gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilwoman Compton led the pledge of allegiance. 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Councilwoman Johnson and Ms. Debbie York, Environmental Resources Coordinator, recognized the following Yard of the Month recipients: Toby & Donna Keeling, 6501 Briley; Robert & Rosalie Bergerson, 4317 Lynn Terrace; Paul & Jodi Miller 6328 Meadowlakes Drive; Bob & Inge Gossett, 7132 Meadow Park N.; Jeff & Cynthie Garner, 6001 Avalon St.; Cindy Tucker, 6924 Meadow Creek; Chad & Stacy Engelhardt, 7004 Mossycup Lane; Randy Keisling, 6809 Green Acres Dr.; Billie Dozier, 6885 Paintbrush Court. Mr. John Dickinson, 6800 Nob Hill was recognized as the Texas SmartScape Winner, and Villas on the Green, Amber Gapinski, Property Manager, 8515 Grapevine Highway as the Business Landscape Winner. City Council Minutes August 22, 2005 Page 4 . 5. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Maury Siskel, 4516 Cummings Drive, asked that the Mayor, Council and other city leaders express their views openly about using public domain proceedings in the eminent development programs in North Richland Hills and asked that North Richland Hills residents write or email their city officials to express their views on this prospect. Mr. Siskel expressed that eminent domain has no application for private commercial development. Mr. Tim Barth, 8400 Bridge Street, advised he attended the Walker Creek Elementary School dedication ceremony and enjoyed the program. Mr. Barth commented on the technology available to the students attending the school and felt that it should be available throughout the school district. Mr. Barth commented that the citizens will have an opportunity to support the upcoming school bond election and that he hoped the citizens will seriously consider the school bond program. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Trevino removed Consent Agenda Item 7a. . 7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED A. REMOVED B. MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 08, 2005 COUNCIL MEETING C. GN 2005-081 APPROVE CONTRACT AUTHORIZING PASS-THROUGH STATE GRANT AGREEMENT FOR NETS - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-058 D. PU 2005-034 AUTHORIZE INTERLOCAL PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF KELLER - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-059 E. PAY 2005-005 APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT TO MCCLENDON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,999.44 FOR DOUGLAS LANE (HIGHTOWER DRIVE TO 200' NORTH) WITH REQUIRED STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS COUNCILMAN WHITSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. . MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. City Council Minutes August 22, 2005 Page 5 . 7A. MINUTES OF THE JULY 29-30, 2005 COUNCIL BUDGET WORK SESSION APPROVED Mayor Trevino stated he would like the minutes to reflect the fact that Councilwoman Bielik made suggestions on obtaining additional taxes for business signs in the City and new revenues by making landlords responsible for delinquent utility bills. There was no concurrence or agreement by the Council on the need to do either of these two suggestions. Staff did respond that they would look into it. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 29-30, 2005 AS CORRECTED BY MAYOR TREVINO. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 8. GN 2005-082 CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED TAX RATE Mayor Trevino opened the Public Hearing on the proposed tax rate. . Mr. Drew Corn, Budget Director, presented the proposed tax rate. The proposed tax rate for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 is 57¢. Because the proposed rate of 57¢ is higher than the effective tax rate of 56.0655¢ two public hearings must be held. The second public hearing will be held on September 12 and the tax rate is scheduled for adoption at the September 26 council meeting. Notice of the public hearings has been published according to State law. Mayor Trevino asked for public comments in opposition to the proposed rate. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino asked for public comments in favor of the proposed rate. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the public hearing and announced that the second public hearing will be held on September 12. The adoption of the tax rate will be considered at the September 26, 2005 Council meeting. 9. GN 2005-083 APPROVE ROADWAY SAFETY AWAR9JESS MARKER POLICY - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-060 APPROVED . Mr. Mike Curtis, Public Works Director, presented the proposed policy. The two primary purposes of the Roadway Safety Awareness Marker Policy are to raise public City Council Minutes August 22, 2005 Page 6 . awareness of the need for safe driving and minimize graffiti and non-conforming signs. The policy allows immediate family members to make a request for a safety awareness sign at a location where a fatality accident occurred. The policy allows different safety awareness phrases to be placed on the sign and the name of the deceased may be placed on the sign if requested by an immediate family member. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION No. 2005..060. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 6-1; MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH, COUNCILWOMEN Cox, COMPTON AND JOHNSON AND COUNCILMEN LEWIS AND WHITSON VOTING FOR AND COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK VOTING AGAINST. 10. PU 2005..035 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES TO PATILLO, BROWN & HILL, L.L.P. - RESOLUTION NO. 2005..061 APPROVED . Mr. Larry Koonce, Finance Director presented the proposed contract. The City requested proposals for professional auditing services and received proposals from Deloitte & Touche; Patillo, Brown and Hill; Ryland, Clay & Optiz; and Weaver and Tidwell. A committee reviewed and evaluated the proposals submitted. The committee concluded the best proposal was submitted by Patillo, Brown & Hill, L.L.P. and recommends the award of the contract to the firm. The term of the engagement will be for fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007 with two optional one-year renewals. COUNCILMAN LEWIS MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION No. 2005-061. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 11. PU 2005-036 AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF PUBLIC SAFETY SOFTWARE FROM COMPUDYNE PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $427,020 - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-062 APPROVED Mr. Kyle Spooner, Director of Information Services, presented the item. The Tiburon system upgrade was approved in the current Capital Projects budget. Because an existing system is being upgraded, the only vendor the upgrade can be purchased from e is Compudyne. Staff is recommending the Council authorize the City Manager to . . . City Council Minutes August22,2005 Page 7 execute a contract for the software upgrade and a Master Support Agreement that extends the City's annual software maintenance with Tiburon for the life of the purchase. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION No. 2005-062. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 12. PU 2005-037 AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEM UPGRADE FROM IBM CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $84,566 - RESOLUTION NO. 2005-063 APPROVED Mr. Kyle Spooner, Information Services Director, presented the item. Staff requested Compudyne (Tiburon) to submit an upgrade proposal to include software and hardware to upgrade the Tiburon system. Staff also requested from the State of Texas Department of Information Services (DIR) pricing from IBM Corporation for the hardware to support the system. Council approved the purchase of the software from Compudyne in the previous item. The DIR pricing for the hardware was less than the proposal provided by Compudyne. Staff is recommending purchasing the IBM servers necessary to support the Tiburon Public Safety upgrade from IBM Corporation. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION No. 2005-063. MAYOR PRO TEM WELCH SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 13. GN 2005-084 CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 2005-2006 BUDGET Mayor Trevino opened the Public Hearing on the proposed 2005-06 Budget. Mr. Larry J. Cunningham, City Manager introduced the proposed 2005-06 Budget and Mr. Drew Corn, Budget Director, presented highlights of the proposed operating funds budget, the capital projects fund budget, and the budgets for the Crime Control & Prevention District and the Park & Recreation Facilities Development Corporation. Mayor Trevino asked for public comments in opposition to the proposed 2005-06 proposed budget. . . . City Council Minutes August22,2005 Page 8 There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino asked for public comments in support of the 2005-06 proposed budget. The following individuals did not wish to speak but completed a public meeting appearance card requesting their support for the budget be recorded: Mr. Tim Gumble, 6516 Circleview Drive - in support of the Golf Course Greens Project Mr. Richard Davis, 6617 Hillside Court - in support of the Golf Course Greens Project. Ms. Tracye Tipps, 6811 Briley Drive, spoke in support of the budget and the proposed Dog Park project. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Trevino closed the Public Hearing. 14. GN 2005-085 CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED Ms. Patricia Hutson, City Secretary, presented the recommendation of the Youth Advisory Committee for appointment of a new committee member. The committee is recommending the City Council reappoint Sara Shive, Birdville High School student, to a one-year term. COUNCILWOMAN COMPTON MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2005-085, APPOINTING SARA SHIVE TO A ONE-YEAR TERM. COUNCILWOMAN BIELIK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. 15. GN 2005-086 CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED Mr. John Pitstick, Director of Planning & Development, recommended the following appointments to the Economic Development Advisory Committee: Phil Myhra, Janet Golightly, Jim Makens, Mike Rigby and Alan Young. The appointees' terms of office will expire in 2007. COUNCILWOMAN JOHNSON MOVED TO APPROVE GN 2005-086, APPROVING THE APPOINTMENTS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. COUNCILMAN WHITSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIED 7-0. . . . City Council Minutes August 22, 2005 Page 9 16. INFORMATION AND REPORTS IR 2005-110 REVIEW OF PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTION OF GREENS AT IRON HORSE Mr. Neil Schmidt, General Manager and Head Golf Professional at Iron Horse, presented the Golf Course Greens Resurfacing project. Mr. Schmidt explained the need to resurface the greens, the reconstruction process, different alternatives considered and the goals of the project. IR 2005-113 REVIEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE DOG PARK FACILITY Ms. Vickie Loftice, Park & Recreation Director, presented the proposed development plan for the dog park facility to be located on property purchased and incorporated into Northfield Park. Council concurred with the information presented by Ms. Loftice and was agreeable with Staff moving forward with the construction documents and specifications to solicit bids. ANNOUNCEMENTS & INFORMATION Councilwoman Cox made the following announcements. Volunteers are needed for a Keep NRH Beautiful community litter cleanup on Saturday, September 17. This event is being held in conjunction with the annual Trinity Trash Bash & Waterfest 2005. Please pre-register as soon as possible by calling 817-427- 6651. City Hall and other City Offices will be closed on Monday, September 5th, in observance of the Labor Day holiday. Garbage will be collected by Trinity Waste Services. Kudos Korner - Tisha Fowler, Animal Adoption & Rescue Center - A letter was received from a resident thanking Tisha for the quick response to his call for assistance when his neighbor's fence fell and a dog got loose. The resident said it is wonderful to have people who work hard to make our city a nice place to live. . . . City Council Minutes August22,2005 Page 1 0 17. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 8: 18 p.m. ATTEST: Oscar Trevino - Mayor Patricia Hutson - City Secretary e e e MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 29, 2005 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Trevino called the meeting to order August 29, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Oscar Trevino Tim Welch John Lewis Jo Cox Suzy Compton JoAnn Johnson David Whitson Nancy Bielik Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: Larry J. Cunningham Richard Torres Alicia Richardson George Staples City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Secretary Attorney . 2. INVOCATION Councilwoman Compton gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilwoman Compton led the pledge of allegiance. 4. EXECUTIVE SESSION · .. e Special City Council Minutes August 29, 2005 Page 2 Mayor Trevino announced at 6:01 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to Executive Session as authorized by Texas Government Code Section 551.072 to deliberate real property (North Hills Mall) and 551.087 to deliberate economic development (North Hills Mall) Mayor Trevino reconvened the Special Council meeting at 8:38 p.m. 5. ACTION ON ANY ITEM DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION No action needed. 6. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Trevino adjourned the meeting at 8:39 p.m.~ e ATTEST: Oscar Trevino - Mayor e Alicia Richardson - Assistant City Secretary ,." CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 Department: Planning and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Consideration of a Request from Kennis Ketchum, Portfolio Agenda Number: FP 2005-13 Development LLC, to Approve the Final Plat of The Venue At Home Town Addition (Located in the 9000 Block of Grapevine Highway - 11.49 acres). Case Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of the Final Plat of The Venue at Home Town Addition. The Venue is the city's first mixed use development and will comprise office/retail and residential uses. Current Zoning: The site is zoned uTC" Town Center. Thoroughfare Plan: The site has frontage on four major streets including Grapevine Highway, a 6-lane, divided major arterial with 130' of ROW, Parker and Walker Boulevards, both 2-lane, undivided commercial streets with 90' of ROW, and Courtenay Street (a 2-lane divided, small avenue with 80' of ROW). Both Parker and Walker Boulevards allow on-street, head-in parking. Courtney Street permits parallel parking. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as being located in the Town· Center development. The proposed use is consistent with both the Comprehensive and Home Town Plans. . Staff Review: The Development Review Committee has reviewed the plat and has determined that it is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Attached is a staff memo recommending that this final plat be placed on the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council Agendas for consideration. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on August 18,2005 recommended approval of FP 2005-13 by a vote of 6-0 subject to minor stipulations from the Public Works Department. The attached letter confirms that the applicant has addressed these stipulations and the plat is ready for Council consideration. Recommendation: Approve FP 2005-13. Review Schedule: Application: 7/05/05 Final Hearing: 9/12/05 Total Review Time: 10 weeks Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds AvatlaDle . /-1 Finance Director tore e , · · · N w s Prepared by Planning 08/12/05 NRH FP 2005-13 Final Plat Lot 1, Blk AB The Venue at Home Town ~Feet o 100200 400 · FP 2005-13 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM KENNIS KETCHUM, PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMANT LLC, TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF THE VENUE AT HOME TOWN ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 9000 BLOCK OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY -11.49 ACRES). APPROVED Mr. Green explained that this is the final plat for the Venue At Home Town. It is the first mixed used development for Home Town and the City of North Richland Hills. Public Works has provided a letter with comments. Staff recommends approval subject to the comments in the engineer's letter. Jim Riley, Brockette Davis Drake Engineers, came forward. Mr. Riley stated that he was aware of the comments that Mr. Van Nieuwenhuize has put together on the R-Q-W dedication, setback, and the actual R-Q-W with Grand Avenue. Mr. Sapp asked Mr. Riley if a site plan was coming soon and how the grade elevations would be dealt with. · Mr. Riley answered yes; a site plan is coming soon. In regards to the grade elevations, that will be tricky due to what is being put in out there. There will be two buildings that have to be relatively close to the finish floor and the street has to be similar. Scott Wood, seconded by Brenda Cole, motioned to approve FP 2005-13 subject to engineer's comments dated August 11, 2005. The motion was earned unanimously (6-0). · · · · NRH OF r\1C)R September 2, 2005 MEMO TO: Carolyn Huggins, Planning Coordinator FROM: Caroline Waggoner, Engineer Associate CrJ SUBJECT: The Venue at Home Town; Lot 1, Block AS Final Plat, FP2005-13 Public Works has reviewed the Final Plat submitted to this office. We recommend placement on the next City Council Meeting Agenda. cc: Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize, P.E., Public Works Assistant Director CLW/pwm2005-191 · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: PlanninQ and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Consideration of a Request from Mvcoskie, Mcinnis Agenda Number: RP 2005-04 Associates (on Behalf of Bates Container) to Approve the Replat of Lot 11 R, Block H Smithfield Addition (Located in the 6400 Block of Smithfield Road - 2.45 acres). Case Summary: The applicant is requesting the approval of a replat of Lots 9-14, Block H to Lot 11 R, Block H Smithfield Addition. The purpose of replatting the 2.45 acre site is to prepare for the construction of a 37,300 square foot industrial building. Current Zoning: The site is zoned "1-2" Medium Industrial. Thoroughfare Plan: The site has frontage along Smithfield Road, a 4-lane, undivided, collector street with 68' of ROW. The plat reflects a small ROW dedication. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan depicts retail uses for this area. The proposed use is not consistent with this depiction but is consistent with the existing industrial zoning of the site. Site Plan Review: Because this site is within 200' of residential zoning, site plan approval is required. The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their August 18th meeting, reviewed and recommended approval of a site plan for an industrial building. Since that review, however, the applicant has proposed several major changes to the site plan. Staff is requesting that this new site plan be re-submitted to the Commission for consideration. The applicant is aware of staff's determination and will be submitting a revise site plan for review. Staff Review: Attached is a staff memo recommending that this replat be placed on the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council Agendas for consideration. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on August 18, 2005 recommended approval of RP 2005-04 by a vote of 6-0. Recommendation: Approve RP 2005-04. Review Schedule: Application: 6/27/05 Final Hearing: 9/12/05 Total Review Time: 11 weeks Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GOlRev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds AVal1aDle 1f/ Finance Director tore . . . -c a:: -c Q) ~ .r:. ~ E Arthur Dr '0" C/) N w E s Prepared by Planning 8/11/05 ..._............................_.. .._____..........__....._._............................._.......eO ............~ ß\~Ò M\d C\t\eS NRH RP 2005-04 Final Replat Lot 11 R, Blk H Smithfield Addition I I i t I I I Feet I o 100 200 400 ' . RP 2005-04 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM MYCOSKIE, MCINNIS ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF BATES CONTAINER TO APPROVE THE REPLA T OF LOT 11 R, BLOCK H SMITHFIELD ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 6400 BLOCK OF SMITHFIELD ROAD - 2.45 ACRES). APPROVED Mr. Green explained that this site is 2.45 acres in size. It is located in the 6400 Block of Smithfield Road. The purpose of this replat is to combine several existing small long narrow lots into one lot for the purpose of an expansion of Bates Container. They are proposing a 37,000+ square foot industrial building on this site. Due to the site having residential adjacent across Smithfield Road to the west, there will be a site plan following this request for approval. This is simply a replat on the property combining all of those lots into one lot.· Public Works has provided a letter stating that the plat is ready for the Commission's consideration. Staff recommends approval of RP 2005-04. Scott Wood, seconded by Ken Sapp, motioned to approve RP 2005-04. The motion eanied unanimously (6-0). . . . . . NRH CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEMO TO: Carolyn Huggins, Planning Coordinator Glenn Smith, Engineer Associate ~ FROM: SUBJECT: Smithfield Addition, Block H - Lot 11 R Replat - RP 2005-04 DATE: August 10, 2005 Public Works has reviewed the replat submitted to this office on August 9, 2005. All of Public Works design criteria has been met. We recommend placement on the next Planning & Zoning meeting agenda. Upon approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission we recommend placement on the subsequent City Council agenda. cc: Mike Curtis, P.E., Public Works Director Michael Buckley, P.E., Mycoskie Mcinnis & Associates, via fax Murel Miller, surveyor, via fax GES/pwm2005-165 · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Approve Abandonment of a Sanitary Sewer Easement Located in Forest Glenn West, Phase II - Ordinance No. 2844 Agenda Number: GN 2005-087 Forest Glenn West, Phase II is located on the east side of Smithfield Road, south of Little Bear Creek, approximately 800 feet north of the Smithfield Road/Bursey Road intersection. A sanitary sewer line which crossed Forest Glenn West, Phase II and a Birdville Independent School District (BISD) tract to the south was relocated as part of the development of this area. The portion of the line across the BISD tract was abandoned by Ordinance No. 2825 (March 28, 2005 Council Meeting). The developer of Forest Glenn West, Phase II is requesting that the sanitary sewer easement for the remainder be abandoned at this time. Recommendation: To approve Ordinance No. 2844. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Fu nds Ävallaole Finance Director .Il~ I ;\ Budget Director I. ~. ll(/1iL./yvl~, ,,~ ignature 'ZA A - I Ci , /'{'\,-i'e ,.t~C~ Department Head Signature Page 1 of _ (J) 3: ~- .-. ... -t ... \tr \II ............ :::r: I ---,. . '.\ : -n I ''..- '\ m ] ; I"""" a.a.a r- IN' JAY ~ I RA'ftIGNO WKIJCDW 0 ::21 VOl. UOO4, ':,c. 1111 I "«IL 1JD01. PO. 310 I :)Jt.T.c... QJU'.c.T. : ZOHtD J.l;. I 2DfCD Nt. AJ I 0 r » ! 0 -.~l " >õ"N ~ . LI'. ; i I . ~., ~~ -: 2 ... ~~l:~~"o.c. -.,....-, j ~~! '... =~~.O~4 D.R-T.e::'". LeT' ~" IIU)CIIC ) 04Ø0IŒt !STAte r~~_;:' " ''''' '- '" I ~~ "'- l~ 1.,- ~.. CHØOItŒ mA.m \/Ol.. .)Ø-4a. ~. IV I "'.R.Y.Cot. I ~ i:~ T . ~ 1 " , ; 1C ~ .ti ,- 4 =1 5 !~ ~ ~ _ it: I FOREST GLENN WEST, PHASE 21 ANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE ABANDONED · 6.. .i 7"'! 4a~ 4-g~ r::r. J ~ ~ -I -! ! ue :¡ ...J~~ !i _: : I ! ~ ~ BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY WL . -. ~.tr ! Iu.~'" I 10 r~ -iJ//' ~ .,,~/ /. ",y s '" ..:/...... ~/: ;;; .....:/ I' ',.- /,,::1;7 g~ 3G. ~96 ACRES ~ISD ~ 311:17. lie. . ~.c:.:. zøe __: it ,.-:' -; .. !It #0 ef . ~ "fl , ....1:n .10... l-.lllUe . . BL ðtrt.c-~~ BLOCK 2 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ., ,.. /, .._:.' ABANDONED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2825 // MARCH, 2005 ~ I.' - / <V Ês. -š;-:.. . ,;-;- .~;: "t/ ì l-r :It 'BUR~EY ROAD' Irï I ,:~~ ) va:.. ~;;~r.~' \4 :¡ ZONED a;: ... I FOREST GLENN WEST, PHASE 1/ AD. '/7. p -,.. tr f - :;,.::c ~ ~~SLID~f' P.ft. T.e. T. : , [ 11 'r....U.L~ !¡- I ! i I . ¡ ï ! I .um«Ja GOeON .... '.1441. P. 774 nR.Tl:.Y ~i i ! AII'IMiM CIOMQII. I FOREST GLENN WEST) PHASE" SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ABANDONMENT - LOCATION MAP · · · ORDINANCE NO. 2844 2 AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT IN THE 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. 6 WHEREAS, the City Council has been requested to abandon a sanitary sewer easement located within the Forest Glenn West, Phase II Development, which is to be 8 replatted; 10 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the portion of the above named sanitary sewer easement is no longer required or convenient for such use; NOW, 12 THEREFORE, 14 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 16 Section 1: THA T the sanitary sewer easement described on Exhibit A hereto is hereby abandoned and closed. 18 20 AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. 22 Passed on the 12th day of September, 2005. 24 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 26 28 By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor 30 ATTEST: 32 34 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary 36 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 38 40 1"; /" l El' . ¡¡ f ;r¡" (./ \. ~ (~" \_11' ~.' Mike Curtis, Public Works Director 42 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 44 46 George A. Staples, Attorney . . . Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 2 FIELD NOTES FOR A PORTION OF A 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE ABANDONED: BEING A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1266, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF A 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 10285, PAGE 451, DEED RECORDS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. AND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING IN THE NORTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 1.3027, PAGE 96, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT BEING DESCRIBED. AND BEING LOCATED 1228.91 FEEï NORTH 43 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, FOREST GLENN WEST, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET AI SLIDE 8899, PLAT RECORDS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES .35 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST 49.3.50 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH .38 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 1 6..30 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 28 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST 479.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 13027, PAGE 96 FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST 17.06 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 1.3027, PAGE 96 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 729.3.72 SQUARE FEET OF LAND, MORE OR LESS 1 (' ~ m (l) ,-- w ~~ ~~ -<f!Jl f-: '''roC) Ü tv lO f-.: ~~cbŒ 1- Ö 00 0: IY. "') :J.) J~ -Ì l -- uo -- j -- :: :: :: -- --------~-- (,-) -- --- ---.-ç- /$: : --=- -- -- / \ lfÎ;~ ì~fj .4JWfJ ONJaNT OT 1>.)1 '-- A POR'I'10N or .>{ t6' S4NIT.ARY /~\y~t S8DB IAS8M6NT {!'1fø o,§ 7293.72 S.F. /IJ 4{;1 ~ co 1~'~1 ~ (j ~ 'ì;·f:J ..~ CJ ~ .^~ì<?j . t~ (, ~ q)'":/;! <I) ~ ~y ZV,.<)1 ."J ~) '\ "? ~ I~/I 'b 0\. \. ~ .'.'/A ( \¡ .(~J ~' l"~f 0 ( '\J 1>/1 ", 1.\1 " l<i /$1 ¡:fy {;:?í .-------.--..---- 't·W----·---·------·----------··--·----··---·--·-·"--·----.--- /',7 /,,___ L 1 / I - 0:' /// I / I ,q, ... /("-/ / <" / // /.... PORTION or ,J'J / / / "1 5' SANI1Nh SEWER EASEMHH ,,{) // VOL. 102R5. PC. 451 ,0 '\./ O.R.T.C.T. ~";.1 //\ .,;::../ //,/ /' r~r~)~(~ ~.~ ~.~:~~~~J::n CAB. 1\. Sl !DE 889q p.n.LC.T. ..~~ ._._.~...........!-_.~....~ @NorrHI SC/\LE1" = 1 00' R[N~fN(; CONT ROL HI\SFO ON CITY or t~onll f~'CHLN~() HILLS GPS D^l^. tMD -- 8:1 GPS Mor~UM[NT NO. 211 J. &. J. NRH 100 FLP VOL. 13155, r'G. -106 D.R.T.C. T. Exhibit A - Sheet 2 of 2 rOR 'ION or 15' S^NITN~Y SF..WEP. EASEMENT VOL 10285, PC. 151 O.R.r.C.T. "¡Þ<{ S~~~ .\~ (1 ç" c,O \ ~ ,\)" o· .\\ ~\í··· t\. \C: Sf,> ~" ", \> ~\ . t ~ .'.---'._.~__ 4.........r.~ -~_......_'_r ,...,......-.._-..~..._-.......--_ J!-g~~y~.. ..., III or 1 I'll" o !nON Plrc (\ AUIS If flHC S T .1"<1:: n CO~tCRETE MONlJl)[Nl rrnc( - ./" .þ-.. rowel( t INF.: f· --T·.. 'Eu:r"OI~E liNe C/'.I1U '[LF:.VISION I_--.·~~-~] CONCRF IT P^""'JG ^sr~1 '^'.1 rl\vtr'IG D--·77 !-~··-7" 1'. P. f.. NUMBER DIRECTION ,--- U.IS1/\ÑC~ ----- .------.------ ------ L 1 N89'51 'sr'W 17.06 '..L"2-.--- 538"23' 1~~----- ·,16.30------· ---~ ------_._-_._-------- AIRDVILLE ISO VOL. 1 J027, PC. 96 D.R.l.C.l. ~ . .. ;:,~~~.g!.lb ~ r~:.:.; 0 \. I .~ :/.."" ",.. ·£~§lE~ IKDI. JI\ ..1 \.... 40 ..¡ y. \. 0 ... ..... J/ ~.;~~~!.~..~.~~.;.~. . .' . -'. .!,} 3U¡;'J~; y:;p J ~..:s:.>,!-.,,~p _....---~-....~~=-----.. .... ~\ 0) ,.. ) o w . . c..r l') ,- G~ rL ,j Cl. ,< ,..: ~Q)r~ «Or) u (11 - i ~ -~~-ë_'__"_ _._. --- . LOYI) BRANSOM SURVEYOf'tS II~'(;. CHARLES 8. HOOI<S, ,H~. REGISfERFJ) PROf"ESSIONAL IAn ) SURVEYOr? 1028 NOR·fH SYLVAt...JI^ ^VENI. ~ FT. WORTI~. TEXAS 7611 1 æJl~)¡~-_8J~--~:~~~-..~~.------- /)' ~ .. ç~"'ír /: .' . l,r' ! !. . . IJ^TF: 9-2' ··-04 -.-....--.....--.-....-----.-.--.-------.-----. -- .-............. .__. . - . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Approve Abandonment of a Utility Easement Agenda Number: GN 2005-088 Located on the North Side of Starnes Road (approximately 200 feet east of Smithfield Road) - Ordinance No. 2845 The proposed abandonment lies within a tract of land on the north side of Starnes Road, approximately 200 feet east of Smithfield Road in the proposed Parkwood Estates addition. Property research during the preliminary platting has revealed the existence of a 10 foot utility easement across this property. There are no City or franchise utility facilities located within the easement. The property owner is requesting the utility easement be abandoned at this time. Recommendation: To approve Ordinance No. 2845. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Ävallable Finance Director Ì1(1 ;1. ~ C. t·, Department Head Signature ¿--r- Budget Director ;f-~ \.4'7\ v---.) : ì (-j Page 1 of _ . . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2845 2 AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING A UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE CITY OF 4 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. 6 WHEREAS, the City Council has been requested to abandon a utility easement located within a 4.1 acre tract of the W.D. Barnes Survey; 8 WHEREAS, the City Council has detennined that the portion of the above named utility 10 easement is no longer required or convenient for such use; NOW, THEREFORE, 12 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, 14 TEXAS: 16 Section 1: THA T the utility easement described on Exhibit A hereto is hereby abandoned and closed. 18 AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. 20 Passed on the 12th day of September, 2005. 22 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 24 26 By: 28 Oscar Trevino, Mayor 30 ATTEST: 32 34 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary 36 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 38 40 c ;1- · )t~ll~ Å'_~ Mike Curtis, Public Works Director 42 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 44 46 George A. Staples, Attorney ,. . . . Exhibit A - Sheet 1 of 2 ABANDONMENT OF A 1 0' UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6556, PAGE 554 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING A PORTION OF A 4.102 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE W.O. BARNES SURVEY. A-146 AS DESCRIBED BY DEED IN VOLUME 4713, PAGE 190, D.R.T.C.T. BEING a 0.094 acre portion of a 4.102 acre tract of land out of the W.O. Barnes Survey, A-146, as described in Volume 4713, Page 190, of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the east property line of said 4.102 acre tract, said point bearing N 00°28'00" W a distance of 15.00 feet from a found 1 /2" iron rod at the southeast corner of the 4.102 acre tract and the southwest corner of Crestwood Estates Addition recorded in Volume 388-101, Page 54, P.R.T.C.T.; THENCE S 88°55' 45" W a distance of 410.52 feet to a point in the west property line of said 4.102 acre tract and the east property line of the Smithfield Storage Addition, recorded in Cabinet Ä, Slide 2579, P.R.T.C.T. for a corner; THENCE N 01°26' 49" E, following said common property line, a distance of 1 0.00 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE N 88°55' 45" E a distance of 41 0.52 feet to a point in the common property line with Crestwood Estates for a corner; THENCE S 00°28'00" E, with said common property line a distance of 1 0.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 0.094 acres (41 07 square feet) of land more or less. ·1.·:)·1.·~·d W trç 3 V'd 'lOl-BB£ 3~nl ^ : O. ..110 V' 531.'9'1.53 aOOMl.5 èJ8 00 · 0 ---- 00. - - NO . 3 "OO,BZ.OO S 0"- I I 0 N (J) ::-0 I I 0 -o~ I I e: :Je: O«LL>- 00 I I LL~ ~ om 0'-' zr-O"': I I w-::>w. I~O~~ I- ík:r- I I o ü · LLOZ(/)o; O~::SWO I I I- v 0.. N Z 10 (J) lL.. U1 0 I I 'to- Wlt)«O«O) 0 I- ~ ~ T""" 0 N Z WWI-G«)w ~I I~ ø .q- < ã) W (J) « .. ~ ,.... ~ LO 0 0 OJ ~ LS a.. ç..- I a.. 0 ci I~I å a::: ..r::. Z « ..Z « N C/) o «) ::> w .. ; I~I; lL. ç I{) 0 0:: ~~ -1 (J) « 00 t!)üow" ík: Z ...J «) « > v a.. l I ~Il w .., « _ I- ík: « Z 15 m I- WZN:Jw n::: 1: « ::>¿«O(/)~ ww~ ~ x ::>~T""" ::> : I ~I: UJ _ ...J (k: .q: (f) -1 ~ (f) OO~ Wo 0 ~ I ;!IIO ..- > «Z> . m lL. n::: . .- ~ N ZolL.«z r- It) :). 0 - om- Ow ~ I. I ~I o (J) · 0 «" (() LO wQZOw ~ « . ~I~I~ m Oa::º~w a....- 0::0..- 0 W ..U 00 Oua::w ~t') · zl I (/)1 (J) üWOI OT"""~ ~o::a..1- «1'0::: ~. I I N 0 ow '-2 I I .::> ~-1 0 I I > I I I I I I I 0 I 0 - I I :t I I ~U) tQ" .~ I I II ""l.~ J \.. ~ i I I ~ I .. ~ I I 0). 1~ 1 3 cc617,9Z.l0 N ~O · 0 -= -- ca. ~o NO (If - - - ~r:)T~·d - - -- . ..- ,..- 0 6L9Z 30rlS 'V .l3NI8V~ Z NOLllaoV' 3Ð\fè:lOl.S al31.=1H.lI~S , '\ --- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ,~ Department: Planning and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Consideration of a Request from Jones & Boyd Inc. (on Agenda Number: SP 2005-08 Behalf of Arcadia Land Partners 17 Ltd.) for Approval of a Site Plan for Franklin Park Senior Independent Living Facility (Located in the 8600 Block of Mid-Cities Boulevard - 7.5 acres). Case Summary: The applicants are requesting approval of a final site plan for the Franklin Park Senior Independent Living Project. A Special Use Permit (SUP) and concept plan (ref. SUP 2004-02) were approved for this development in October of last year. The project is located on 7.5 acres in the 8600 Block of Mid-Cities Boulevard. The purpose of the site plan approval process is to ensure that the proposed commercial or industrial use is compatible with adjacent or nearby residential areas. Compatibility issues would include building height and setbacks, fire lanes and parking lot circulation, exterior lighting, signage, dumpster pad location, landscaping and screening, outside storage or display ... etc. Issues involving drainage, utilities, access (including Traffic Impact Analysis) are part of a subdivision plat analysis and are not considered as part of the site plan review process. Existing Zoning: The site is currently zoned "TC" Town Center Comprehensive Plan: The site is located within the area identified on the Comprehensive Plan for Town Center uses. The Town Center Regulating Plan identifies this area as being in the "Center" Neighborhood. The proposed use is consiste·nt with both Plans. Thoroughfare Plan: The site has frontage onto Winter Park Drive, a collector street with 60' of ROW. The site also fronts onto future Riverdale Drive, a local street with 50' of ROW. The site parallels but does not have frontage onto Mid-Cities Boulevard (separated by a drainage channel). The Thoroughfare Plan and Home Town Regulating Plan identify Riverdale Dr. as being extended east with a bridge over The Lakes at Home Town. This extension will serve as a future easUwest access in Home Town and be constructed as future development occurs on the east side of the lakes. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GOlRev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director , ,-..-.. ~. btf-Jf""'o... I I " t -, --.-J ~_ .. \/ .,' £-¡ 'rk~l~~~ Department Head Signature SP 2005-08 Franklin Park CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Plat Status: A final plat for this tract (ref. FP 2005-07 Lot 1, Block Q Home Town West Phase 6 West) is also on this agenda for consideration. Existing Site Conditions: The site is vacant and is characterized as being relatively flat with very little vegetation. Site Design Features: The following features are noted on the site, landscape and building elevation plans. Building Design and Materials: · The project consists of 194 units; · The 3-story design is oriented parallel to Mid-Cities Boulevard (but is separated by a drainage ditch) with the entryway located off of Winter Park Drive; · Building materials for the first two stories consists of brick and stone. The third floor is composed of stucco; · Composition materials are utilized for the pitched-roof design; · The design is highlighted by a architectural tower near the main entrance; · Covered parking structures (consisting of carports and garages) are characterized by brick and steel post construction and pitched-roofs with composition shingles; · The proposed architectural design has been reviewed and approved by the Home Town developer. Access and Parking: · Primary access to the project is from Winter Park Drive. A secondary access point is provided from Riverdale Drive; · A 26' fire lane extends from the entrance off of Winter Park Drive along the northern and eastern portion of the site and terminates into Riverdale Drive; · A parking ratio of one space per unit has been provided. This ratio is acceptable for this type of development. Of the 194 spaces, 76 spaces are surface parking, 98 spaces are covered by carports and the remaining 24 spaces are garaged; · A note on the face of the site plan notes that no on-street parking (for this development) will be permitted on Riverdale Drive; Landscaping and Screening: · The submitted landscape plan shows the site as being heavily landscaped with various trees, shrubs, flowers... etc.; · The proposed landscaping along Winter Park and Riverdale Drives exceeds the minimum requirements for landscaped street setbacks; · The developers of this project have requested (see attached letter) permission from the city to plant and maintain landscaping along the Mid-Cities Boulevard frontage. City staff have reviewed the plan and have granted permission for the proposed tree line along Mid-Cities Boulevard; · In addition to the proposed landscaping, the project includes a 6' wrought iron perimeter fence with stone columns. This fence extends along most of the north, east, south and west perimeter of the site; · The interior of the site will be fenced and gated. -- ....'..-....O.''T'-=·....~,.>'~'~~. ,C,.',O,.- '. '~~':W-I'L ~__.., CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Signage and Lighting: · A single monument sign is proposed near the entrance off of Winter Park Drive. The proposed sign meets current standards; · A series of ornamental pole lights are distributed throughout the site. Primary lighting is situated along the northern and eastern sides and the interior of the development; · The lighting plan notes that lighting from this project shall not cause a nuisance to surrounding neighborhoods. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on August 18, 2005 recommended approval of SP 2005-08 by a vote of 6-0. Staff Recommendation: Approve SP 2005-08. Review Schedule: Application: 3/14/05 Final Hearing: 9/12/05 Total Review Time: 26 weeks* * Additional time was required for the applicant to address staffs comments. ,.,.'TV ,,^, ,a,,.,.,, A ,.....,.,na, 'T'~.. . . . N w E s Prepared by Planning 8/11/05 Mid Cities Blvd L.. o c 0:····· en "'C c ::J E « NRH SP 2005-08 Site Plan Franklin Park Senior Independent Living Center I I ~Feet I o 100 200 400 I . SP 2005-08 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM JONES & BOYD, INC. ON BEHALF OF ARCADIA LAND PARTNERS 17, LTD. FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR FRANKLIN PARK SENIOR INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILITY (LOCATED IN THE 8600 BLOCK OF MID-CITIES BOULEVARD -7.5 ACRES). APPROVED . Mr. Green explained that this is a 3-story design for a senior independent living facility with the entryway coming off of Winter Park Drive. A Special Use Permit (SUP) was brought forward last year with a conceptual plan and the P&Z and City Council approved it subject to the applicant returning with a final plat and site plan for approval prior to any building permits being issued on this property. The applicant is proposing brick and stucco design buildings and the architecture for this development has gone through the Hometown architectural review process and received approval. Just a fraction of the landscape plan submitted to staff is shown tonight. This is a remarkable project and the applicant has done an extraordinary job with the proposed landscaping of this site. The drainage channel along the north side of the property is owned by the City and is part of the lake system for Hometown. The applicant, Franklin Development, is taking responsibility for landscaping and maintaining this area since this is the front yard of their development. A total of 194 units are being proposed. A letter from Public Works states that staff supports this site plan. Chairman Davis asked the applicant to define "basic maintenance" for the landscaping of the ditch along Mid-Cities Boulevard. Greg Grand Jean, Franklin Development, stated that they will work out an agreement with the Parks Department. He stated that they are planning to put in irrigation for the trees and they will cut and edge around the trees and in the parkway. The Chairman asked that they define sprinkling, trimming, and mowing with specifics such as "15-ft. path from the curb line back" so that the applicant knows what they are required to do and the City is clear on its expectations. Mr. Wood asked for an explanation of parking. Tim Settles, representative of the management arm of Franklin Development, stated that the demographics are such that the average age is north of 80. Half of the residents own vehicles; therefore, .5 of the required parking is typical in this type of venue. He gave as examples two other independent senior communities, Meadow Lakes which has a .7 parking ratio and The Wellington, which has a ratio of .833. He stated that their parking will be 1: 1, which will be more than adequate. Randy Shiflet, seconded by Brenda Cole, motioned to approve SP 2005-08. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). . . . . F~LIN D EVE LOP ~í E N T A CORPORATION August 10,2005 Mr. David Green Mr. Bill Thomton City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76182 Re: Franklin Park Senior Independent Living Project located in the 8200 Block of Mid- Cities Boulevard Dear Mr. Green and Mr. Thornton, As part of the Site Plan Approval Process, it was noted that approximately 80' wide Drainage Easement area located between our development and Mid-Cities Boulevard will need to be maintained by the Owner of the Franklin Park Senior Independent Living Facility. Please allow this letter to serve as record that Franklin Park Hometown, Ltd., who is the Owner of the proposed Franklin Park Senior Independent Living Project, will provide basic maintenance services for the approximately 80' wide drainage easement located between our property and Mid-Cities Boulevard, and further outlined in the attached sketch, upon approval of the Site Plan and completion of the project. S)~eIY ll/\.·) f\ /' ~ ~~ ..~ ~Y(in Wilson FraÌì-k-!0 Development For: Frankin Park Hometown, Ltd. 2511 N. LOOD 1604 West, Suite 605 . San Antonio, Texas 78258 . 210-694-2223 fax 210-694-2225 . . . NI~H CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEMO TO: Carolyn Huggins, Planning Coordinator FROM: Glenn Smith, Engineer Associate 13 SUBJECT: Hometown NRH West Phase 6; Lot 1, Block Q Site Plan, SP2005-08 DATE: August 12, 2005 Public Works has reviewed the site plan submitted to this office on August 5, 2005. All of Public Works design criteria has been met. We recommend placement on the next Planning & Zoning meeting agenda. Upon approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission we recommend placement on the subsequent City Council agenda. cc: Mike Curtis, Public Works Director Javier Jaramillo, Jones & Boyd, via fax GES/pwm2005-172 i. . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Consideration of a Request from Jones & Bovd, Inc. (on Agenda Number: FP 2005-07 Behalf of Arcadia Land Partners 17 Ltd.) to Approve the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block Q Hometown West Phase 6 Addition (Located in the 8600 Block of Mid-Cities Boulevard - 7.5 acres). Case Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block Q Home Town West Phase 6 Addition. This 7.39 acre tract is being platted for development as the Franklin Park Senior Independent Living Facility. Site Plan Review: The applicant has a final site plan approval request (ref. SP 2005-08) also on this agenda for consideration by the Council. Current Zoning: The site is currently zoned uTC" Town Center. A Special Use Permit (SUP) and concept plan (ref SUP 2004-02) were approved for this development in October of 2004. Comprehensive Plan: The site is located within the area identified on the Comprehensive Plan for Town Center uses. The Town Center Regulating Plan identifies this area as being in the "Center" Neighborhood. The proposed use is consistent with both Plans. Thoroughfare Plan: The site has frontage onto Winter Park Drive, a collector street with 60' of ROW. The site also fronts onto future Riverdale Drive, a local street with 50' of ROW. The site parallels but does not have frontage onto Mid-Cities Boulevard (separated by a drainage channel). The Thoroughfare Plan and Home Town Regulating Plan identify Riverdale Dr. as being extended east with a bridge over The Lakes at Home Town. This extension will serve as a future east/west access in Home Town and be constructed as future development occurs on the east side of the lakes. Staff Review: The Development Review Committee has reviewed the plat and has determined that it is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Attached is a staff memo recommending that this final plat be placed on the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council Agendas for consideration. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GOIRev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds AvaIlable De artment Head Si I?~ J¿ / ture Finance Director ~~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on August 18, 2005 recommended approval of FP 2005-07 by a vote of 6-0 subject to minor stipulations from the Public Works Department. The attached letter confirms that the applicant has addressed these stipulations and the plat is ready for Council consideration. Recommendation: Approve FP 2005-07. Review Schedule: Application: 3/14/05 Final Hearing: 9/12/05 Total Review Time: 26 weeks* *This plat was submitted concurrently with the site plan approval request for the Franklin Park Senior Independent Living Facility and as such was slowed by the review process of the site plan. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM · · · I I Iw I ! N E s Prepared by Planning 8/11/05 Mid Cities Blvd ~ o c o en -c c :J E cd:: NRH í I I I f. I I ¡ Feet I o 100 200 400 f FP 2005-07 Final Plat Lot 1, Blk Q Hometown West Phase 6 . FP 2005-07 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM JONES & BOYD, INC. ON BEHALF OF ARCADIA LAND PARTNERS 17, LTD., TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK Q HOMETOWN WEST PHASE 6 ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 8600 BLOCK OF MID-CITIES BOULEVARD - 7.5 ACRES). APPROVED Mr. Green explained that this site is in the 8600 block of Mid Cities Blvd. There is an existing drainage channel and lake along the Hometown boundary. Last year, an SUP was approved for this site for a proposed senior independent living facility. This is the final plat for that lot and the next item on the agenda will be the site plan for this development. Access will be along Winter Park Drive to the west of this development. A memo from the Public Works Department lists minor items that should be addressed and staff recommends approval subject to the requirements listed in the engineer's letter. . Javier Jaramillo, Jones & Boyd, representing the applicant, stated that the SUP was approved by P&Z and the City Council at the end of last year and they are now proceeding with the final plat and site plan. He stated that they are working with Public Works to resolve the remaining two issues, one of which is along the easUwest property line there is a 10-inch water main constructed with Phase 3 Hometown development and Public Works is requesting a water easement by separate instrument. The Chairman asked if that separate instrument has been done. Mr. Jaramillo stated that it is being reviewed by Public Works and once approved will be filed. The other issue was at the southeast corner along Riverdale. Riverdale does not extend all the way down to the southeast corner. It falls short before the crossing over the lake. Public Works asked for an extension of the sidewalk to the southeast comer but Jones & Boyd is requesting postponement of the sidewalk construction because if constructed at this time, it will be damaged and have to be replaced once the bridge structure is built. Escrow money will be put up for the sidewalk. Ken Sapp, seconded by Don Bowen, motioned to approve FP 2005-07 subject to the engineer's comments dated August 12, 2005 regarding the water easement and the escrow requirements for sidewalk completion. The motion was approved unanimously (6-0). . . . . NRH ~- September 2, 2005 MEMO TO: Carolyn Huggins, Planning Coordinator FROM: Caroline Waggoner, Engineer Associate (j) SUBJECT: Home Town NRH West, Phase 6; Lot 1, Block Q Final Plat, FP2005-07 Public Works has reviewed the Final Plat submitted to this office. We recommend placement on the next City Council Meeting Agenda. cc: Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize, P.E., Public Works Assistant Director CLW/pwm2005-192 .. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Approve Abandonment of a Sanitary Sewer Easement Located in Home Town NRH West, Phase 6- Ordinance No. 2846 Agenda Number: GN 2005-089 Home Town NRH West, Phase 6 is located on the east side of Winter Park Road, just south of Mid-Cities Boulevard. A sanitary sewer line which crosses proposed Lot 1, Block Q of this addition was removed from the active system as part of the development of Home Town in this area. The work is complete for the relocation of the sanitary sewer. The developer is requesting that the sanitary sewer easement for the old alignment be abandoned at this time. Recommendation: To approve Ordinance No. 2846. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Fu nds Ävallat>le Finance Director 2A ; -, (ì t ~/ï It £ j~(J t ;Ar ,'~ Department Head Signature /1 /-¡-- ~'¡ . ..r- _ ~udget Director r7tt:4/Lr-, ~ ÚVú~~ . City Mah~ignature . j Page 1 of _ . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2846 2 AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT IN THE 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. 6 WHEREAS, the City Council has been requested to abandon a sanitary sewer easement located within the Home Town NRH West, Phase 6 Development, which is to 8 be rep latted; 10 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the portion of the above named sanitary sewer easement is no longer required or convenient for such use; NOW, 12 THEREFORE, 14 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 16 Section 1: THA T the sanitary sewer easement described on Exhibit A hereto is hereby abandoned and closed. 18 20 AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. 22 Passed on the 12th day of September, 2005. 24 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 26 28 By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor 30 ATTEST: 32 34 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary 36 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 38 40 71/{ : lL-~ (r~. Mike Curtis, Public Works Director 42 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 44 46 George A. Staples, Attorney EXHIBIT "A" EASEMENT ABANDONMENT SHEET 1 OF 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING all that tract of land in the City of North Richiand Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, a part of the T. K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 1055, and being a part of that 13.352 acre tract of land conveyed to Arcadia Land Partners 17, Ltd. as recorded in Volume 14986, Page 363, Tarrant County Deed Records, a part of a 15 foot wide easement granted to Tarrant County Water Supply Corp. as recorded in Volume 3877, Page 296, Tarrant County Deed Records, and being further described as follows: COMMENCING at a one-half inch iron rod found for corner in the north line of Home Town NRH West - Phase 3, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills as recorded Cabinet A, Slide 10054, Tarrant County Plat Records, said point being the intersection of the north line of Riverdale Drive (50 foot right-af-way) with the east line of Winter Park Drive (60 foot right-af-way); THENCE along the east line of Winter Park Drive as follows: North 01 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds West, 49.37 feet to a one-half inch iron rod found for corner; Northwesterly, 67.86 feet along a curve to the left having a central angle of 15 degrees 14 minutes 49 seconds, a radius of 255.00 feet, a tangent of 34.13 feet, whose chord bears North 08 degrees 45 minutes 10 seconds West, 67.66 feet to a point for corner and the POINT OF BEGINNING of this tract of land; THENCE Northwesterly, 15.85 feet along a curve to the left in the east line of Winter Park Drive, said curve having a central angle of 03 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds, a radius of 255.00 feet, a tangent of 7.93 feet, whose chord bears North 18 degrees 09 minutes 26 seconds West, 15.85 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 17 minutes 07 seconds East, 808.90 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 17 minutes 07 seconds East, 15.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 17 minutes 07 seconds West, 804.03 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 12,096 square feet or 0.278 acres of land. Drawtng: H:\Projecta\SCROO1\dw9\XSGROO1ESUTABHD.dw; Sawd By: rdvae Saw 11m« 6/1/2005 10:24 AM DRAWN: RS PROJECT: SGR001 DA TE: 6/01/05 IFJ1I Jones & Boyd, Inc. IW 17090 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200 : ::... DaUas, Texas 75248 · = Tel: 972-248-7676 · SIMying Fax: 972-248-1414 EXHIBIT U A" EASEMENT ABANDONMENT SHEET 2 OF 2 L3 / / - / t- --ì / \ I / \ : ~ _1_____---- L~ -r--------- SANITARY SEWER ESMT. VOL. 14250. PG. 301 UNE L1 L2 L3 L4 1/2- IRF L 1 -=--=--=--=--=--=--=-1--=- TARRANT COUNTY WATER SUPPLY CORP. VOL 3877, PG. 296 o 0: ~;' ~d :,)II! O~ CD' ~i 12:- o § z o f= Q Q <tr> CDcn~ ~~CI) c<W ...1....10 a3:I:~ -0:: -z< bZa:i ...J~< go L&J ~ J: ~ ....I r' -fI') ~~ ~~ ~cò CLCD Ø) 0..... z-- =~ Õ < (,) 0: < ~ $ CURVE C1 C2 . Pt P.O.B. Drawing: H:\Projecta\SGROO1\dwv\XSGROO1ESWTABND.dwg 5cNed By: ralw. Sow time: 1/1/2005 10:24 AM SCALE 1 n = 1 00' DR A WN: RS PROJECT: SGR001 DA TE: 6/01/05 It) N an It) o CD - - ~I~ CD CD < -< ~ ~~ ~ ~z a: 0:0 ~ ~~ ZI~8 r= ""....I a: ~. ..: ;ëx ::¡ ~~ . .0.. ~ (.)0.. ~I.J-c I II :¡ .!!1 I g;, I d ~~ ~ò ~~ ( I I I ILOT 1. BLOCK 8 HOME TOWN NRH LAKES ADDll10N j ~. A SUCE 8333 ) L_ --- ,/' ",- --. / -- / ( ~ 'r r f-- f-- l 'MNTER P A.RK DRIVE (60· R.O.W.) ----- 1mI.·. Jones & Boyd, Inc. IW 17090 Dallas Parkway. Suite 200 : ~ Dallas, Texas 75248 · = Tel: 972-248-7676 . 9uwyiIg Fax: 972-248-1414 , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Public HearinQ and Consideration of a ReQuest from Agenda Number: FP 2005-12 Ramypasha Investments, Inc. to Approve the Final Plat of Woodland Oaks Phase 2 Addition (Located in the 6700 Block of Precinct Line Road - 3.24 acres). Case Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of the Final Plat of Woodland Oaks Phase 2 Addition. The plat proposes ten R-2-sized residential lots. Preliminary Plat: A preliminary plat for this site (ref. PP 2004-05 Woodland Oaks East Addition) was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in 2004. Residential Replat Public Hearing: A portion of this site is currently platted as Lot 18, Block 1 Woodland Oaks Addition. The applicant is proposing to subdivide this existing lot into approximately 3 new lots. According to State Law requirements, a replat of an existing residential platted lot requires that a public hearing for approval must be held by the City Council. This request has been advertised according to State Law requirements. Current Zoning: This site was rezoned to "R2" Residential in September of 2004 (ref. ZC 2004-04). Thoroughfare Plan: The site has frontage along Precinct Line Road, however, 8 of the proposed 10 lots are accessed by a private street, Woodland Hills Drive, with Nob Hill Drive (a 2-lane, local public street with a 50' R.O.W.) providing access to the remaining 2 lots. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan was revised to low density residential use for this site with the approval of a zoning change to "R2" Residential in 2004. The proposed uses are consistent with the Plan. Staff Review: The Development Review Committee has reviewed the plat and has determined that it is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Attached is a staff memo recommending that this final plat be placed on the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council Agendas for consideration. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on August 18, 2005 recommended approval of FP 2005-12 by a vote of 6-0 subject to minor stipulations from the Public Works Department. The attached letter confirms that the applicant has addressed these stipulations and the plat is ready for Council consideration. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GOlRev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds Avallaole Finance Director \ n-~... ~. --1-X). J /L-. /(-¡ De artment Head Si ture CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Recommendation: Approve FP 2005-12. Review Schedule: Application: 6/27/05 Final Hearing: 9/12/05 CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Total Review Time: 12 weeks . . . N W~E ~ ¡ S NRH FP 2005-12 Final Plat Woodland Oaks Phase 2 Prepared by Planning 06/30/05 o 100 200 -c m o c=: Q) c: :.::¡ +-' U c: '0 Q) '- c.. I Feet I, 400 . FP 2005-12 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM RAMYPASHA INVESTMENTS, INC. TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF WOODLAND OAKS PHASE 2 ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 6700 BLOCK OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD - 3.24 ACRES). APPROVED Mr. Green explained that this final plat is an area that was reviewed last year in terms of rezoning and preliminary platting. This subdivision is located along Precinct Line Road with an entryway off of Precinct Line Road, but two of the ten lots are accessed by Nob Hill Drive. Public Works has provided a letter stating that there are a few minor issues that need to be addressed and staff recommends approval subject to meeting engineer's comments. The Chairman stated that the engineers letter regards the wording for an abandoned easement. Ted Brooks, representing the applicant, stated that they would meet the requirements of Public Works' memo dated August 11 regarding the easement issue. He agreed that the changes would be made before going to Council. . The Chairman asked for an explanation of their plan for the end of Nob Hill Drive where it deadends into Lot 26. Mr. Brooks stated that they will have a concrete flume out to the street. He stated that they will have to do something to screen it off. The Chairman asked if they envisioned a gate for a rear entry garage on Lot 26. Mr. Brooks stated that Lot 26 is too steep to have a driveway off of Nab Hill Drive. He stated that it will have a driveway off of Woodland Hills Drive. The Chairman asked Mr. Brooks to work with staff to have a very visible fence and perhaps a reflection system and signage so people know it is a dead end. Ms. Cole noted that on Lot 24 the existing zoning is stated as AG and should be corrected before going to Council. Scott Wood, seconded by Don Bowen, motioned to approve FP 2005-12 subject to meeting the requirements of Public Works memo dated August 11 and noting the AG zoning correction for Lot 24. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). . . . . NRH ¡"-'Tr-r-',"l r)F· Nr}D Tl_T D T ;____ ill "-. L . '-.." 1'\... 1 1 J f'- [ September 2, 2005 MEMO TO: Carolyn Huggins, Planning Coordinator FROM: Caroline Waggoner, Engineer Associate c..J;:J SUBJECT: Woodland Oaks, Phase 2; Lots 1-13, Block 1 Final Plat, FP2005-12 Public Works has reviewed the Final Plat submitted to this office. We recommend placement on the next City Council Meeting Agenda. cc: Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize, P.E., Public Works Assistant Director CLW/pwm2005-190 \.. t' /" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: PlanninÇJ and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Public Hearinq and Consideration of a Request from Agenda Number: ZC 2005-10 Gordon Swift Consulting Engineers, Inc. (on Behalf of West Creek Partners, LLC) on a Zoning Change from "C-1" Commercial to "RI-PD" Residential Infill-Planned Development (Located in the 8400 Block of Hightower Drive - 2.27acres). Ordinance No. 2847 Case Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of a zoning change from "C-1" Commercial to "RI-PD" Residential Infill Planned Development. The 2.27 acre site is located in the 8400 block of Hightower Drive (southeast corner of Hightower Drive and Davis Boulevard). A residential development consisting of 13 lots is proposed. Site Plan: All requests for PO zoning must be accompanied by a site plan detailing the various elements of the proposed development. The applicant has submitted a plan and a narrative that outlines the basic development. Existing Site Conditions: The site is currently vacant with some mature trees scattered throughout the site. The site has an extensive slope from Davis Boulevard downward to the eastern boundary of the site. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan depicts neighborhood service uses for this tract. The neighborhood service category is intended to permit limited service establishments and retail stores for the benefit of adjacent and nearby residential areas. The Comprehensive Plan's no-residential depiction is based in part on this area becoming a future 4-corner intersection. The proposed residential use is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Thoroughfare Plan: The site has frontage along Davis Boulevard, a future 6-lane, divided, major arterial with 120' ROWand Hightower Drive, a future 4-lane, undivided, major collector street with 68' of ROW. The Thoroughfare Plan indicates Hightower Drive (in the future) to extend from Smithfield Road eastward to Davis Boulevard and then further eastward to Eden Road. Plat Status: The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat based on the site plan design. This plat is still undergoing staff review. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ö-e~ /@--- Finance Director Department Head Signature ZC 2005-10 Stone Villas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Adjacent Zoning / land Use: North: "C-1" / Vacant East: "R-2" / Single family neighborhood South: "C-1" / Vacant, single family neighborhood West: "C-1" / Vacant Land Use Summary: · Total acreage · Number of lots · Gross density · Open space 2.27 acres 13 5.72 houses per acre (gross) Lot C of Block 1 and Lot A of Block 2 Minimum Lot Dimensions/Setbacks: · Min. house size · Min. lot area · Max. lot area · Min. lot width · Min. lot depth · Min. front setback · Min. side setback · Min. rear setback . Max. height 1 ,800 square foot with 2,000 sq. ft. average 3,196 sq. ft. 8,886 sq. ft. vanes 70' 10' 10' 10' Not mentioned Development Amenities: · Divided entryway with decorative paving and water feature; · Stamped concrete pedestrian crosswalks to proposed open space; · Landscaped open space area in center of development; · Open space includes park benches and a gazebo; · Community mailboxes; · Exterior of development is enclosed by a 6' solid brick wall along Davis Boulevard, and a combination stone/wrought iron wall along Hightower Drive; · Established Homeowners Association (HOA); · Hightower Drive landscaping to be watered and maintained by HOA; · HOA to maintain all open space amenities; · Private streets. Housing Amenities: . 800ft> masonry construction; · 8/12 roof pitch; · All lots irrigated with automatic system; · 20' garage setbacks from front lot line; · Garages to have decorative wood doors (if seen from street) · Minimum lot landscaping requirements; · Rock or masonry lined landscape areas . . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing concerning this request on August 18th. The Commission voted at that time to continue the public hearing until September 1 st. The purpose of this continuance was to allow the applicant time to revise his application prior to the Commission making a final recommendation to Council. On September 1 st, the Commission recommended approval of ZC 2005-10 contingent on the applicant stubbing out the irrigation system to Davis Boulevard ROWand replacing the proposed wax myrtles in the Davis Boulevard ROW with landscaping complying with the City's Sight Visibility Easement requirements. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 2847 in accordance with the Planning and Zoning Commission's requests for stubbing out the irrigation system to Davis Blvd. right-of-way and replacing the proposed wax myrtles in the Davis Boulevard right-af-way with landscaping complying with the City's sight visibility easement requirements. Review Schedule: Application: 5/23/05 Final Hearing: 9/12/05 Total Review Time: 16 weeks* * Additional time was required to process this application in order to insure that the design concepts of the "RI-PD" District were incorporated. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2847 ZONING CASE ZC 2005-10 .4 6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND REZONING A 2.27 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY FROM Cl (COMMERCIAL) TO RI-PD (RESIDENTIAL INFILL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONING; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 8 10 12 WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and, 14 16 WHEREAS, notice ofa public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 15 days before such hearing; and, 18 20 WHEREAS, public hearings to zone the property herein described were held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation concerning the zone change; and, 22 24 WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zone change herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, .26 28 30 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 32 Section 1: THAT the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map of the City of North Richland Hills are hereby amended by rezoning a 2.27 acre tract of land located in the 8400 Block of Hightower Drive in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, more particularly described as Tract A-R, Block 13, Stoneybrooke Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, from C 1 Commercial to RI - PD Residential Infill Planned Development zoning and approving a final site plan as submitted herewith. 34 36 38 40 Section 2: Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as amended hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon final conviction thereof fined in an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day any such violation shall be allowed to continue shall constitute a separate violation and punishable hereunder. 42 44 . Ordinance No. 2847 Page 1 of 2 Section 3: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause the publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clauses of this ordinance as an alternative method of publication provided by law. 2 .4 Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage. 6 AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. 8 PASSED on this 12th day of September, 2005. 10 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 12 14 By: 16 Oscar Trevino, Mayor 18 ATTEST: 20 22 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary 24 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: .6 28 George A. Staples, Attorney 30 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 32 34 John Pitstick, Director of Planning and Development . Ordinance No. 2847 Page 2 of 2 . . . N E NRH ZC 2005-10 RI-PD Lots 1-14, Blks 1 &2 Stone Villas Addition s Prepared by Planning 8/03/05 Feet I o 100 200 400 J --' . . . 6. ZC 2005-10 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM GORDON SWIFT CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. (ON BEHALF OF WEST CRREK PARTNERS, LLC.) FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM "C1" COMMERCIAL TO "RI-PD" RESIDENTIAL INFILL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (8400 BLOCK OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE - 2.27 ACRES). APPROVED Mr. Van Nieuwenhuize presented the case. This property is located at the southeast corner of Hightower Drive and Davis Boulevard. This item was continued from the last P&Z meeting. At that time, Planning & Zoning expressed some concerns that the Commission wanted corrected. Since that time, the applicant has made those changes. While making those changes, Public Works introduced two additional comments. A Commission member wanted wax myrtles along Davis Boulevard, however, Public Works would like those wax myrtles out of the sight visibility easement. The second comment was to change some wording in the PD notes. Other than that, Staff recommends approval of this RI-PD. Chairman Davis opened and continued the public hearing. John Dancer, 2001 Creek Side in Arlington, came forward. Everything has been done that was asked of us. Anything that needs to be changed can be done. The wax myrtles have been removed from the sight visibility triangle, but they still go all the way down Hightower Drive in front of the wrought iron section. Mr. Sapp asked Mr. Dancer about item 12 in the planned development requirements. He would like to see watering and maintenance of Hightower Drive extended to along Davis Boulevard. Mr. Dancer responded that he wasn't sure if it would be allowed. It will be up to the Highway Department. Chairman Davis stated that the comment in the last meeting was that the irrigation system should be stubbed out that way in case permission is obtained from the Highway Department. Mr. Dancer agreed. Mr. Sapp stated that it is common for the Highway Department to approve or disapprove that. Many Homeowners' Associations landscape and maintain at their own risk for the benefit of the homeowners. Chairman Davis asked that a note be added to item 12: If allowed by the Highway Department, Davis Boulevard landscaping will be extended. Chairman Davis asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. Being . none, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Van Nieuwenhuize pointed out that Staff was not recommending the deletion of the wax myrtles in the sight visibility easement. Staff was recommending the relocation. Staff likes the landscaping. Chairman Davis asked about dwarf wax myrtles. Mr. Van Nieuwenhuize stated that it could be added to the landscaping agreement. Mr. Dancer agreed. Ken Sapp, seconded by Randy Shiflet, motioned to approve ZC 2005-10 with the two noted corrections. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). Chairman Davis commented that this is the second RI-PD this Commission has done. The bar has been raised. This developer challenged the Commission and met each bar that was raised. The applicant is looking for the same type of quality as this Commission. It will be great use for this property. Once this is done, the applicant is looking at the property on the north side of Hightower Drive. The people in Stonybrook are going to be grateful for that kind of entrance into the subdivision. The Commission appreciates the applicant's persistence and patience. . . F, e e e , STONyBROOKE ADDITION "STONE VILLAS" NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS CONCEPT PLAN AND ZONING CHANGE REQUEST NARRATIVE September 1, 2005 N@RTH RICH LAND H ILL 5 ZC 2005-10 Presented by: West Creek Partners, LLC 2808 Brookshire Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 Prepared by: Gordon S. Swift Consulting Engineers, Inc. 900 Monroe Street, Ste 404 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 '. e e e , . STONYBROOKE ADDITION "STONE VILLAS" Table of Contents I. Narrative II. Planned Development Requirements ITI. Exhibits: A. Site Plan B. Landscape Plan C. Site Elevations D. Typical Home Elevation E. Typical Wood Garage Door F. Example of Hightower Screening Wall e I. Narrative e e e Stone Villas Stone Villas will be a "garden home" neighborhood of luxury homes. Homes will be a minimum of 1,800 square feet, and average 2,000 square feet. Each lot will provide for a minimum 50-foot front for each home. Homes will be one and two story and at least 80 percent masonry. The masonry exteriors will be brick or stone. Brick exteriors will be accented with stone or rock. Roof pitch shall be at least 8/12 with timberline or superior shin~es ("three-tab" shingles will NOT be allowed). The garages shall be set back at least 20-feet from the property line, and if they can be seen from the private drive, shall be decorative wood. The mailboxes will be grouped at two or three central locations and shall be constructed of brick or stone to match the character of the neighborhood. The homes will be no closer then 10 feet to an adjacent home and driveways shall be concrete or pavestone. The pedestrian crossings will be accents for the entire private circle drive, as they will be either pavestone or decorative concrete. e There will be significant landscaping features, such as requiring each builder to landscape each lot with a minimum of 15 one-gallon shrubs and two trees, with a caliper of 2- inches, and a minimum of one in each front yard. The planting beds around each home in the front. yards shall be masonry or rock lined. Each home will be required to be built with an automatic sprinkler system as well. Not only will each home be landscaped, but the common open space in the center island, at the entrance and the right of way along the adjacent roadways, will be extensively landscaped and equipped with automatic sprinkler systems. The common area in the island will include, as part of the development of the lots, a gazebo, picnic areas and park benches and be maintained by the Home Owner's Association. e e Stone Villas Narrative . Page Two To further incorporate the 'feel' of a special neighborhood, a decorative screening wall shall be installed along Davis and Hightower. The wall along Hightower shall be masonry or stone construction with brick or stone columns and wrought iron. Wax myrtle shrubs will be planted along the wall for aesthetics and screening. The wall along Davis Boulevard shall be full masonry or stone construction. The distinctive entrance will set Stone Villas apart with a divided median that will include a fountain, and lush landscaping. e Exhibits in this Narrative include pictures of the typical home elevation, typical wood garage door and a picture of a screening wall similar to the one to be constructed for this project. e e II. Planned Development Requirements e e e e e 1. DWELLINGS TO BE 1,800 S.F. MINIMUM WITH AN AVERAGE OF 2,000 S.F. 2. ALL DWELLINGS WILL BE ONE AND TWO STORY. 3. UNITS WILL BE 80% MASONRY. 4. ROOF PITCH SHALL BE AT LEAST 8/12 WITH TIMBERLINE OR SUPERIOR (NO 'THREE-TAB'SHINGLES). 5. ALL DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREAS TO BE CONCRETE OR PAVESTONE. 6. THE DECORATIVE SCREENING WALLS ALONG DAVIS DRIVE AND HIGHTOWER DRIVE SHALL BE SIX-FOOT MASONRY OR STONE CONSTRUCTION, WITH BRICK OR STONE COLUMNS AND WROUGHT IRON ALONG HIGHTOWER AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION. ACCENTS AND CORNERS CAN INCLUDE WROUGHT IRON. 7 . SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE HOME BUILDER AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THIS PLAN AND BE 3' WIDE MINIMUM. 8. MAILBOXES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF STONE OR BRICK. 9. EACH LOT SHALL HAVE A FULL AREA WATER SPRINKLER SYSTEM. 10. ELECTRIC & TELEPHONE SERVICE SHALL BE UNDERGROUND. 11. COMMON AMENITIES, PRIVATE DRIVE (AND EMERGENCY ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT) PARKING AREAS AND ALL COMMON OPEN SPACE NOT SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL LOTS (WHICH INCLUDE BUILDING COVERAGE PORCHES AND FENCED IN PRIVATE PATIO AREAS) WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. 12. THE PARKWAY AREA ALONG HIGHTOWER SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. 13. 10'-0" MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS. 14. PROJECT SIGNS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SIGN ORDINANCE. 15. EACH OWNER WILL OWN A PORTION OF ALL COMMON AREAS AND WILL BE MEMBERS OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND WILL PROVIDE MAINTENANCE AND LIABILITY COVERAGE FOR COMMON AREAS. 16. ALL BUILDINGS HAVE 10'-0" BUILDING SETBACK FROM PRIVATE STREET PAVED SURFACE. 17. IFTHE GARAGE DOOR CAN BE SEEN FROM THE DRIVE IN FRONT OFTHE HOUSE THE DOOR MUST BE DECORATIVE WOOD. 18. GARAGE SETBACKS MUST BE AT LEAST 20 FEET MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. LANDSCAPING AND OPEN AREAS 1. EACH LOT SHALL BE LANDSCAPED BY THE BUILDER WITH A MINIMUM OF 15 ONE- GALLON SHRUBS, TWO TREES (2" CALIPER MEASURED 6" ABOVE ROOT BALL) WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE TREE IN THE FRONT YARD. 2. EACH HOME SHALL HAVE PLANTING BEDS AND BE MASONRY OR ROCK LINED. 3. ALL PLANTING BEDS AND GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC WATER SPRINKLER SYSTEM. e III. Exhibits e e -e e ~ i' II W H i ~ z.lÌ::lcn Ë !1 W ~. - .. , i .I!I~ i II Ii. I; I ! i;ill I ål iliË I i Ilil i ; II I IliI! lullllll i d IIII I I :~ -I Iii, I ~I!I;; I§! I I III ~ -¡ Ii ~B S; i! II !II;; =tlall i!:n~ I.Uul Illhl~ I ~b~:~ ,.: ..51: Ii å~. . t:i SIt ~ ~~ ~ ,. O~ ~.~ tP~ ~ç 'Ô¿ ~ NtP . --........ -.... .....--......... -....- ................ b. ~ I I I I I I ....J ;/ ~I I I ":-/ U¡ I ~ ~~ ¿ 0 'r-, ..~S~ ." J. ~ ~ OD~Q V O...~ 'i ~~~ ~ 'tJl -----1 ~ \ _ . ~ f __VOl <.0 a::: , I ~a g)lOOHBÁNOJ.S e (eesr "JY".!l) ... . U Cl~7f1 SJ~ lfQ I i ft ~ = - i .i iiI I ~=;! ¡~ a I.~J~ S!II!~ SiE. GCI- III I~· ~! 15~i! a.! f! II· Rig' alii fÃ=~1 E.ÞJ. =-8~ 111;:1 I ¡ .2e~ I.:J z.· . ~ ! à 18" t: dB Z' ~ -I ~ .2 IA a: i vI ~. Zl: CIS (; : ~Iå ~ 0 ¡=' ~ !Ji Q ~,¡ ~ ~J ~ 81 -. _. ---.-. ..... -.....-. =. -= -~-. =. -~-.=. -= -~-. =. --,--.~. =. ~r· -·-::::-11 I i \ J I J ~ \1 ¡! , Ii I ! I! ~ I J D. Ii ~ 'i c I.' w I! ~ ~ , 2 _o..~ Ii iil 11 0 \1 ~\ 1~ 11 ¡! 'i IJ ,1 I Ii u ., ~ ~ ~ e . I ãi 1,li I~!,n ii~ j~ rSi III !iuJi ~ ! J~I ¡~ ""'0) _ z~ j; >~ u? oãi ~ o ~) e ~! a I~ ~ 1: o f 12 .J:: ..9 :r ~~~ -~' ", ,..~ - ~~ ".:s.~ _ -.....,~~ .c. -~ e (9€6l . YV::¡) 'lJ/t/f/ $,,/;fea ~ \ --·-~I - ~~ .c~,~~ ~~. II I ~ oj c( JJ .11 ~ IØII ~ I!! elf. eo !I ! 1t'~~<J<J<J<J<1 ~ - J e 2 D ~ ~; 2x ::Ie ~ ~lli ~ti ~ B~ J¡ (m ,I '",-, 2 D ¡: ~ w id j ~ II: W .. i;t (.~ s , (¢) "-- : I ;~ "1= I ! "}--. :- b~ F ~~ qrri =-'1 I := i ~I ~ -I ., ~o·;·...:..~ . '. °0 . . .. °.04 .. o- J ':I ;~ be I .-.- .-- 2 C ~. :> ~ w > a: b .. ::. ~ i .--. ~,~.: ~ CWJ " --. a 2~ ! e~ 1 u:] We ram :1m ;~ .Ie ~CI U2 b ia ;;. >.1 :; t-~~ ~'ID :. . i c ~ c:o ~~ z ~ ~ ~ ~:: ~~i ¡; vc] =:~ D ¡ i : : i i I I i i i !. I I . ... ~ a.- I. : 1. OJ ai <t .. ., . e e e e e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: PlanninQ and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 9/12105 Subject Consideration of a Request from Graham Ranch Partners, Agenda Number: PS 2003-37 Ltd. to Approve the Vacation of the Final Plat of Graham Ranch Phase I Addition (Located in the 7000 Block of Hightower Drive - 54.7 acres). Case Summary: The applicant is requesting the vacation of Graham Ranch Phase I Addition. In lieu of the existing plat, the applicant has submitted a revised final plat (ref. PS 2005-16) for the Council's consideration. The original final plat (ref PS 2003-37) was approved by the Commission and Council in October of 2003. The plat, however, was never filed with Tarrant County. The City Attorney has determined that although the plat was never filed, it does exist and the applicant is required to vacate the original plat prior to approval of the new final plat. Since the City Attorney has determined that the previous City Council approved final plat is a legitimate plat, the public easements and rights-of-way dedicated to the City via this plat exist today and will continue to exist until Council action to the contrary. Given the City Attorney's determination that the City has the easements dedicated to the public (and rights-of-ways) on this unrecorded final plat, the Public Works Department desires to retain the public dedication of specific easements which are necessary to facilitate the overall development of the surrounding area. In accordance with the City Attorney's determination, the Public Works Department desires an assurance that any new final plat for this portion of the Graham Ranch Addition include either the publicly dedicated drainage easement along the western and southern boundaries of the existing unrecorded plat (this area of land is known as Phase III Common Open Space & Drainage Easement) or a dedication of this area as a drainage easement via a separate instrument. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at their September 1 st meeting and voted 6-0 to recommend approval. Recommendation: Approve PS 2003-37 contingent on the applicant providing the City with a dedicated drainage easement for the area of land known as Phase III Common Open Space & Drainage Easement. Review Schedule: Application: 7/05/05 Final Hearing: 9/12105 Total Review Time: 10 weeks Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GOlRev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Foods AVaIlaOle Finance Director .=~~ De artment Head Si ture ~. ". /' .~~ f~A/L" ~ (¡ i /tGì~,r-- t::' -./ v u \. \. \....L, v v \ ./ vCitv Mana er Si ture t../ .. . . . NI~H CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEMO TO: Carolyn Huggins, Planning Coordinator 1t r FROM: Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: PS 2003-37; Graham Ranch Addition - Phase One Vacation of Final Plat for Graham Ranch Addition - Phase One DATE: September 6, 2005 Public Works has reviewed the proposed "Vacation of the Final Plat for Graham Ranch Addition - Phase One" document submitted to the Planning and Development Department on September 2, 2005. The applicant has addressed our previous concerns and we recommend placement of this item on the agenda for the next City Council Meeting. # . . . - I-- r-::::l .-1 \- I I ---<v - \11 I -~ I I ~ \ II ¡IlL = ~ I ~ ~ - - 1 - I ( r) - '1 Y - Elementary - a-- - -~----{ - ~) /í - - Hlç~ntower Jr ;j!~î~1~[~ì~~~1~il l~f!~I~~ ~it~¡lh :';.,.;' n*¡{:!¡~} j: ;,: J:!!{;·.f!;;·~~t{;i[!~¡¡!f;· ~- I 1-( _ ffij; tfB ==- =-= J = --"- - -- -- =- ,~--1 -- tfB - ,~--1- I ==- r r.J - - = rs~r_- 01== 1 \.f--1I- _ =~ I II \ r= J .J \ I I - :::::; = ~:.s j UL = H ¡-c::x;;: I I I ,r í >-rrTì :< i N I W.E I 5 I I ! I I ¡ ¡ ¡ Prepared by ¡ Planning 8/18/05 L-_____._._________ NRH I I I :J L.... - t3 ~ ~ (~ t1) ~ .~ ~ L.,...--- ~ - =----- PS 2003-37 Final Plat Graham Ranch Addition Phase 1 _.~-----_._-----------_.... I i I I I ¡ I ~ Feet I o 10æOO 400 ¡ ---_._~--~.._-_._j -- . . . 4. PS 2003-37 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM GRAHAM RANCH PARTNERS, LTD., TO APPROVE THE VACATION OF THE FINAL PLAT OF GRAHAM RANCH PHASE I ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 7000 BLOCK OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE - 54.7 ACRES). APPROVED Greg Van Nieuwenhuize, Assistant Director of Public Works, presented the case. Staff is asking the Commission to vacate the final plat of Graham Ranch Phase I. This was a final plat that was brought to the Planning & Zoning Commission and was approved by City Council in October 2003. The plat was never filed with Tarrant County. At this point the developer would like to develop a portion of this plat. Since it was never filed with the County something needs to be done with the plat. In order for the applicant to complete the next item, this plat needs to be vacated. Staff has a few minor comments and the applicant is willing to address those comments. Staff recommends approval of PS 2003-37. Chairman Davis commented that this plat was never filed with Tarrant County. This is strictly an internal matter as far as Staff getting this case off the books. The plat wasn't signed or filed. Nothing will ever be filed to show that this plat was vacated. Technically a plat can't be vacated if it was never filed. Ken Sapp, seconded by Bill Schopper, motioned to approve PS 2003-37. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Department Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Consideration of a Request from Graham Ranch Partners Agenda Number: FP 2005-16 Ltd. to Approve the Final Plat of Graham Ranch Phase I Addition (Located in the 7000 Block of Hightower Drive - 34.09 acres). Case Summary: The applicant, Graham Ranch Partners, Ltd., is requesting approval of a new Final Plat of Graham Ranch Phase I Addition. The applicant's current proposal is smaller in area (34.11 acres) than the original Phase I (54.70 acres). The "ghosted" area shown to the west of Phase I will be platted in the future as Phase III of Graham Ranch. The lot and street patterns proposed by the current Phase I proposal are identical to the preliminary and final plats approved in 2003. Current Zoning: The site is zoned "R-2" Residential. Thoroughfare Plan: The plat proposes one street connection to Hightower Drive, a proposed four lane, undivided, collector with 68' ROW. There are no proposed street connections to the adjacent Richfield Addition; however, a single street connection is shown to the future Graham Ranch Phase II (south of this site). Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan was revised in 2003 to reflect single family residential uses following the approval of a rezoning request by the applicant (ref. PZ 2002- 42). The proposed use is consistent with this depiction. Staff Review: The Development Review Committee has reviewed the plat and has determined that it complies with the approved Preliminary Plat. Based on the City Attorney's determination that prior to a Council action vacating the Graham Ranch Addition - Phase I, a "Common Open Space & Drainage Easement" exists along the western and southern boundary of Phase I, the Public Works Department has asked that the area known as Phase III "Common Open Space & Drainage Easement" be dedicated by separate instrument as a Drainage Easement. This drainage easement is necessary to facilitate the overall development of the surrounding area. Without this drainage easement, the development of the commercially zoned property to the immediate west will be difficult. Since this easement exists today (prior to any vacating action by the Council), staff desires for a drainage easement to exist in this same location with the final platting of the new Graham Ranch Addition - Phase I. The Public Works Department has also asked that the previously approved Water Course Maintenance Agreement be modified to comply with the new development plan for Graham Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds AVaI.taDle "~/~ ¿ Finance Director . . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Ranch Addition - Phases I and II. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: At the September 1 st Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, the Commission recommended approval of FP 2005-16 contingent on the applicant executing the revised Water Course Maintenance Agreement. The Commission did not include Public Works' request for the applicant to obtain a dedicated drainage easement on the area of land known as Phase III "Common Open Space & Drainage Easement" in their recommendation to the City Council. Recommendation: Approve FP 2005-16 contingent on the applicant providing the City with a dedicated drainage easement for the area of land known as Phase III Common Open Space & Drainage Easement. Review Schedule: Application: 7/05/05 Final Hearing: 9/12/05 Total Review Time: 10 weeks CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . . . N w E NRH FP 2005-16 Final Plat 1 08 Lots Graham Ranch Addition Phase 1 5 Prepared by Planning 8/11/05 rLrLII Feet o 100200 400 · · · NI~H CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEMO TO: Carolyn Huggins, Planning Coordinator FROM: Gregory Van Nieuwenhuize, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: FP 2005-16, Graham Ranch Addition - Phase One Final Plat DATE: September 6, 2005 Public Works has reviewed the proposed "Final Plat for Graham Ranch Addition - Phase One" document submitted to the Planning and Development Department on September 2, 2005. Previously, we had the following concerns: 1. The previously executed "Water Course Maintenance Agreement" needs to be re-executed with the appropriate wording. This revised Agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney, City Council and recorded at the Tarrant County Courthouse. This document has been approved by the City Attorney and is being prepared for Council action at their meeting of September 26, 2005. 2. The applicant shall provide the City with an off-site drainage easement for the unplatted tract of land commonly known as the future Lot 35, Block 1 of Phase III. The applicant has provided the Public Works Department with an unexecuted Drainage Easement instrument; however, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved this item at their September 1, 2005 without Public Works' request for this drainage easement. Based on the advice of the City Attorney, the Public Works Department maintains that this drainage easement exists today and up until the time the City Council takes the appropriate action to vacate the previously approved Final Plat for Graham Ranch Addition - Phase One. Therefore, the Public Works Department requests that this drainage easement be included via separate instrument with the present Final Plat. Base on these comments, we recommend placement of this item on the agenda for the next City Council Meeting. . 5. FP 2005-16 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM GRAHAM RANCH PARTNERS, LTD., TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF GRAHAM RANCH PHASE I ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 7000 BLOCK OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE - 34.09 ACRES). APPROVED Mr. Van Nieuwenhuize, presented the case. This final plat is just a portion of the previous final plat that was approved in 2003. This final plat meets all minimum requirements. Public Works has some minor outstanding issues but these issues have been agreeable to the developer and they will be completed prior to City Council. Chairman Davis stated that the previous plat was never filed. It has no standing as far as being a dedicated document. Due to that, the Chairman feels it would be inappropriate to require Item #2 in Public Works letter which requests an offsite drainage easement. It is not necessary for this phase as it doesn't affect the drainage improvements of this phase. . Mr. Van Nieuwenhuize agreed. However, the on-site drainage easements are necessary . Chairman Davis asked the applicant to come forward. Mark Wood, representative for Graham Ranch Partners, Ltd., came forward. Mr. Wood stated that Graham Ranch Partners, Ltd" doesn't currently own the property and didn't own the property at the time it was platted last time. It was being purchased subject to platting and zoning. The intent was to purchase and record the plat simultaneously. At this stage Graham Ranch Partners, Ltd., will only be purchasing what is seen in this plat along with Phase II. The intent is to develop Phase I and Phase II at the same time. Phase II is to the south. The west side in the future will be known as Phase III. This will include all the necessary drainage, utilities, and so forth for all phases. The reason for the division has to do with the gas drilling ordinances. Graham Ranch isn't involved in that and doesn't own the property. The existing land owner has the drilling rights. Fortunately, the way it is designed, none of that property or the current drainage goes in that direction. It all goes to the south and to the east. Mr. Schopper commented that he likes the way it has been divided out. It is obvious that Mesa Drive isn't going to connect. That was a concern previously. . Mr. Wood stated that when Phase III is done there will be 150-ft. wide ditch with no connection to the existing neighborhood. There will be sufficient access to the north and to the south during Phase I and Phase II both at the same time. The . main property will be left as it is until such time it is developed or until such time that the property develops to the west of it. It would be the current owners intent that should that commercial property to the west develop there will have to be an arrangement made to develop the drainage ditch. Mr. Sapp asked Mr. Wood if the crossing across Wild Ranch Road is a bridge. Mr. Wood responded yes. Mr. Shiflet asked Mr. Wood if Police and Fire have approved the street names. Mr. Wood responded yes. Also on Phase II there is a neighborhood park in the middle just below the bridge connection. Chairman Davis clarified his earlier comments. Public Works asked for an easement, however, it shouldn't be a requirement before it goes to Council. The motion should include the deletion of comment two of Public Works memo dated the 26th. Scott Wood, seconded by Bill Schopper, motioned to approve FP 2005-16 with the deletion of item two. The motion was carried unanimously (6-0). . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: BudQet and Research Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Conduct Public HearinQ on Proposed Tax Rate Agenda Number: GN 2005-090 Senate Bill 18 that was passed during the regular 79th Session of the Texas Legislature made several changes to the way the tax rate must be adopted. One of the changes is the requirement to hold two public hearings on the proposed property tax rate if the proposed rate exceeds the effective tax rate. Because the proposed rate of 57¢ is higher than the effective tax rate of 56.0655¢, we must hold two public hearings. Tonight's hearing is the second of the two required hearings. Senate Bill 18 also has very specific requirements on how to publish notice of the public hearings. Notice of the public hearings was duly posted in the Northeast Section of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram on August 12, 2005 per state law. Senate Bill 18 also requires us to phrase the notice of public hearing on the tax rate as a "tax increase" because the proposed tax rate is above the effective tax rate. As you may remember, the effective tax rate is basically the property tax rate necessary to produce the same amount of property tax revenues as the prior year. The first required public hearing was held on August 22, 2005. The tax rate is scheduled to be adopted on September 26, 2005 during the regular 7:00 pm City Council meeting. The proposed tax rate for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 is 57¢. If adopted, this will be the thirteenth consecutive year the City has maintained a 57¢ tax rate. Individual taxpayers' property taxes may decrease, increase or stay the same depending on the appraised value of their property. Per the Tarrant Appraisal District, as of August 11, 2005, 202 single family residential properties had values that decreased as compared to last year, 3,859 have increased and 11,907 have stayed the same. With the exception of senior and disabled property owners, this will affect property taxes accordingly. There are currently 2,809 senior property owners and 284 disabled property owners who have a tax ceiling; even if their property values have increased they will pay the same amount of property tax as the previous year. The City of North Richland Hills is proud of the progress we have made while demonstrating sound financial management of our Citizen's tax dollars. Recommendation: To open the public hearing and receive public comments on the proposed 57¢ tax rate and announce September 26, 2005 as the date of the tax rate adoption Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Avai a e Budget Manager y/~_ L- Deoartment Head Sianature \~'i Finance Director Page 1 of .. .. tf CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Approve Water and Sewer Rates - Ordinance No. 2848 Agenda Number: GN 2005-091 The City recently commissioned an independent Water and Sewer Cost of Service Study to examine the base and volume water rates. The study recommends that the City adjust base and volume rates, due to continued increases in the cost of doing business. The study was conducted by Carolyn M. Marshall, a certified public accountant, and presented to the City Council during the July 25, 2005 Pre-Council meeting. The results of the study and proposed rates were also discussed at the budget worksession on July 29th and 30th. The proposed base and volume rates included in the ordinance are based on the results of the study. The "base and volume" portion of the utility bill covers the City's debt service and the costs associated with the City's operations, maintenance and customer service. The base rate is a "ready for use" charge applied to every customer. For a residential customer with a %" meter the base rate includes the first 2,000 gallons of water and the first 750 gallons of sewer usage each month. The volume rates are applied to water and sewer use that exceeds the base amounts. The base and volume rates have not changed since 1994. To minimize the affect on customers, the ordinance phases in the rate adjustment over a three-year period and uses the Rate Stabilization Reserve to soften the impact. The Rate Stabilization Reserve was established several years ago, primarily with funds the City received from selling a portion of the water system to the City of Watauga. By using the reserve now, the City can lessen the impact of a rate increase on customers. The ordinance makes the rate change effective December 1st which is typically one of the lowest times of consumption for the residential customer. The ordinance includes the base and volume rates to be phased in over the next three years. The following is the proposed base rate and volume rate schedule for residential customers with %" meters: Water Rates Dec. Dec. Dec. Current 2005 2006 2007 Base $9.00 $9.05 $9.12 $9.30 Volume $2.45 $2.51 $2.58 $2.69 Sewer Rates Dec. Dec. Dec. Current 2005 2006 2007 Base $7.22 $7.22 $7.27 $7.27 Volume $1.17 $1.17 $1.17 $1.17 %Cha 3.33°/0 9.79°/0 °/oCha 0.69°k 0.000/0 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient f~nds l~vai a e {!t¿~ l:~ . Budget Manager \~ '~ ~ /~ . ;/- Ci..-1, ~i..1l-,,~t_.vt..L--- Finance Director ~·~vt! '\~ ~/j(,t<-i-t~, L / z...,Citv Manaaer Siqhature Page 1 of 2 ..J '~è, ¿. v-V"J /~z;¡,..¿ c::..--- . - 0: ·partment Head Sianature . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS The impact of the proposed water and sewer rate changes on the average residential customer with a %" meter using 8,760 gallons per month of water would be $0.60 per month beginning in December 2005, which is a 1.2 percent increase. In December 2006, the average customer would see an additional increase of $0.74 per month or 1.4 percent. In December 2007, the increase would be $1.17 per month or 2.2 percent. These amounts are averages and will vary by customer by month, depending on actual water usage. By carefully managing costs, the City has been able to defer adjustments to the base and volume rates since 1994. With the proposed rate adjustments, the City will be in a better position to continue to provide quality service and maintain customer satisfaction. Even with the proposed rate increases, a survey of Tarrant County cities shows that the new rate structure will remain competitive with our neighboring cities. The survey compared bills for 5,000 gallons and 10,000 gallons of water and sewer. In both examples, North Richland Hills falls in the mid-range of the 12 cities surveyed. Information regarding rate increases has been thoroughly communicated to customers through a City Cable Presentation, the City Website "City Hall Buzz," and through a "News and Notes" insert in utility bills. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 2848. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 2 of 2 . 18 20 22 24 . 26 28 30 32 34 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2848 4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES AND INCREASING WATER AND SEWER RATES AND CHARGES. 6 8 WHEREAS, 10 WHEREAS, 12 14 WHEREAS, 16 staff analysis of rates and charges for water and sewer service has indicated a need to increase such rates and charges; and staff has recommended and the City Council has concurred that such increases should be phased in over a period of time; and the City Council finds that the increases hereinafter established are required in addition to pass through charges from the City's water suppliers; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1: THAT Chapter 78 of Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby amended by substituting therefor Exhibit A attached hereto and made apart hereof by reference. AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. Passed and approved this 12th day of September, 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor 36 ATTEST: 38 Patricia Hutson, City Secretary 40 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 42 44 George A. Staples, Attorney 46 . APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 48 '-£,' 50 . CHAPTER is. UTiliTIES Section 78-121 I I ~ater rate scheduie I . 1 ) Three-auarter-tnch meter, minimum for 0--267 cubic feet. . . December 1 , 2005 = 9.05, December 1, 2006 = 9.12, December 1, 2007 = 9.30 From 267 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet. . . December 1 , 2005 = 2.51, December 1, 2006 = 2.58, December 1, 2007 = 2.69 (2) One-inch meter. minimum for 0-345 cubic feet. . . December 1, 2005 = 15.11, December 1, 2006 = 15.23, December 1, 2007 = 15.53 From 345 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet. . . December 1, 2005 = 2.51, December 1, 2006 = 2.58, December 1, 2007 = 2.69 (3) One and one-half-inch meter. minimum for 0--937 cubic feet. . . December 1 , 2005 = 30.14, December 1 , 2006 = 30.37, December 1, 2007 = 30.97 All over 937 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet. . . December 1 , 2005 = 2.51, December 1, 2006 = 2.58, December 1, 2007 = 2.69 (4) Two-inch meter. minimum for 0--1.300 cubic feet. . . December 1, 2005 = 48.24, December 1, 2006 = 48.61, December 1, 2007 = 49.57 All over 1 ,300 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet. . . December 1, 2005 = 2.51, December 1, 2006 = 2.58, December 1, 2007 = 2.69 (5) Three-inch meter. minimum for 0--2,400 cubic feet. . . December 1, 2005 = 1 05.ô1, December 1, 2006 = 106.43, December 1, 2007 = 108.53 All over 2,400 cubic feet, per 1 00 cubic feet. . . December 1, 2005 = 2.51, December 1, 2006 = 2.58, December 1, 2007 = 2.69 (6) Four-inch meter. minimum for 0--4,000 cubic feet. . . December 1, 2005 = 190.05, December 1, 2006 = 191.52, December 1, 2007 = 195.30 All over 4,000 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet. . . December 1, 2005 = 2.51, December 1, 2006 = 2.58, December 1, 2007 = 2.69 (7) Six-inch and eiaht-inch meter. minimum for 0--10.000 cubic feet. . . December 1, 2005 = 422.36, December 1, 2006 = 425.63, December 1, 2007 = 434.03 . EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 4 I I o I · All over 10,000 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet. . . December 1,2005 = 2.51, December 1, 2006 = 2.58, December 1, 2007 = 2.69 TABLE INSET: Location in Code Section 78-123 per unit minimum charge · Section 78-124 per unit minimum charge Section ì8·125 Section 78-141 · Isection ì8-146 I I IDescriotion I Billing where only one user or building is tied to the same meter, per 100 cubic feet, minimum bill Effective Date: December 1,2005 December 1, 2006 December 1, 2007 Where more than one user or building is tied onto the same meter, per month, for the first 267 cubic feet Effective Date: December 1, 2005 December 1, 2006 December 1, 2007 For apartment complexes and trailer parks, per month, minimum volume of 267 cubic feet Effective Date: December 1, 2005 December 1! 2006 December 1. 2007 ILOading dock or tank truck customers. per 1,000 gallons ¡ ~ewer rates ! Minimum monthly service charge ¡Effective Date: December 1, 2005 December 1, 2006 December 1. 2007 i ¡PIUS. monthly volume charge, per 100 cubic feet of water used. or wastewater produced ¡Billing poiic'l where more than one user or building is tied onto the same water meter. I I EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 4 bJ I \ I I ~:~~ ~.69 I 9.05 \9.12 9.30 I r I I 9.05 \9.12 !9.30 ~ I I ¡---j I ~.~: I;:~~ I ! 11.17 I , I I I ¡ I ¡For eacn customer Unit for sewer, per month Effective Date: I I . t7.22 I I December 1 t 2005 þ.27 December 1! 2006 ~.27 December 1. 2007 I W I I ¡PIUS. monthly volume charge. per 100 cubic feet of water used Section ì8-149 IBilling for apartment complexes and trailer parks. I I ~ MonthlY service fee 10.00 Minimum charge plus, per month per month per unit Effective Date: December 1, 2005 ~.22 December 1! 2006 t7 .27 December 1, 2007 H I I !PIUS. a monthly volume charge, per 100 cubic feet of water used by the apartment complex or trailer oark I I 11.1 ì I . i I ~ater and Sewer Deposits I ~ ~alCUlation of water and wastewater deposit-The required commercial deposit will be1.5 times the average ¡Section 78-1 ì1 ~ill. If no historical data is available the deposit will be taken from the following scnedule. All residential I ustomers will use the following scheduìe. ! I T ABLE INSET: Customer iype later Sewer I I Residential: I I I I All sizes p7.00 118.00 I I I I I I I I I I : I I commerClal: I I I I ; I ~5.00 I I 6/4" - 1 1/4" I I ,36.00 . j I I I EXHIBIT A I Page 3 of 4 11 1/2' -- ¿" ~50.00 I i I I 1180.00 . I ~.300.00 k,71 0.00 6" -- 8" I I I I Multifamily I I ~II sizesJper unit I \19.00 I þo.OO I ! TABLE INSET: I ~mount I Code ¡Description CO Icut-off charge ~o.oo I ¡ I I DB Ioamage meter box I 125.00 I I ~o.oo . LO ¡Lock cut I I ì IReturned check I(TO be posted\ RC I ¡ I I i SC IServlce charge 110.00 ! I I I V\H ~fter hours charge þo.oo , IMeter bypass I BP 150.00 TF I 110.00 ~ransfer fee I I leut lock ring I ILR þo.oo ~ i I ~ amoer with transoonder SO I i ¡ . EXHIBIT A Page 4 of 4 :* ... ! CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Economic Development Council Meeting Date: Se~tember 12, 2005 Subject: Approve Joint Resolution with the City of Richland Hills Agenda Number: GN-2005-092 for South Grapevine Highway Corridor Branding & Design Study - Resolution No. 2005-064 Background: The South Grapevine Highway Corridor Branding & Design Study has been completed by The Jet Powered Group and Carter & Burgess and receives unanimous recommendation from the Joint Oversight Committee to adopt the study recommendations for branding and design elements for the 26 Corridor. The primary name of the area which includes sections in both North Richland Hills and Richland Hills along South Grapevine Highway, Rufe Snow south of Loop 820 and Glenview is recommended to be "twentysix". A diamond shaped logo with the letters 26 using a cayenne color are also recommended for branding purposes that would be used on all street signs in the area. The name of South Grapevine Highway is recommended to be changed to Boulevard 26. The Marketing Plan promotes a younger audience between the ages of 21 and 35 including young professionals and couples who already have a family or are seeking to start a family. Conceptual design elements are also included in the Study that entail signs, lighting, sidewalks, medians, intersections and entryway treatments. More detail design of the street elements will be determined as public improvements are built. The Oversight Committee has met extensively over the past several months to review these study recommendations. Two joint City Council meetings have also been held to reach consensus on these branding and design elements. The Oversight Committee and City Councils have been given the entire report previously. For the final adoption staff has included the essential marketing plan and branding elements of the study for your final review. The Richland Hills City Council will be considering this resolution for final adoption on Tuesday, September 13. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds Ävallable -1£.~ ¿/ Department Head Signature Finance Director -- ~ Page 1 of 1 , ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Further public meetings and hearings will be held to continue to inform local businesses and the general public regarding implementation of the twentysix recommendations and changing the name of Grapevine Highway to Boulevard 26. Please find enclosed a joint resolution supporting the implementation of efforts to name the South Grapevine Highway, South Rufe Snow and Glenview Drive area to twentysix and the name of Grapevine Highway to Boulevard 26 RECOMMENDATION: To approve Resolution No. 2005-064. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 2 of 2 e RESOLUTION NO. 2005-064 A JOINT RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITIES OF RICHLAND HILLS AND NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ADOPTING THE SOUTH GRAPEVINE IDGHW A Y CORRIDOR BRANDING & DESIGN STUDY This resolution is enacted by the cities of North Richland Hills and Richland Hills, Texas, both of which are home rule Texas municipalities, acting pursuant to their respective charters and State law by and through their duly authorized representatives. WHEREAS, the City Councils of North Richland Hills and Richland Hills (Cities), desire to enter into an undertaking to jointly promote the branding and design recommendations of the South Grapevine Highway Corridor Branding & Design Study to encourage the revitalization of South Grapevine Highway, South Rufe Snow and Glenview Corridors, which revitalization is a mutual concern, and which roadway corridors are located within both cities; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCILS OF THE CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS AND THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: Sec. 1: The South Grapevine Highway Corridor Branding and Design Study is hereby e adopted. Sec. 2: The following guidelines are hereby established for implementing branding and design efforts for the revitalization of the South Grapevine Highway Corridor area: 1) Cities agree that specific branding and design efforts for the new "twentysix" shall be limited to the area as described in the map as identified in Attachment "A". 2) Cities agree to promote the --26" logo design and to market the detined area as a unique area within both cities. 3) Cities agree to rename Grapevine Highway within the city limits of each city to "Boulevard 26" by notifying property owners, businesses and the Postal Service and proceed with changing the street signs on this important corridor. The section of Grapevine Highway within North Richland Hills that is located north of Loop 820 and outside of the defined "twentysix" map area shall be limited to a name change only and not incorporate "twentysix" logo and design recommendations. 4) Cities agree to proceed in developing street design standards and elements for "Boulevard 26" south of Loop 820. e 5) Cities agree to proceed with the design and construction of intersection improvements at Boulevard 26 and Rufe Snow and Boulevard 26 and Glenview Drive. e e e PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of September, 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary Approved as to fonn and legality: George A. Staples, Attorney PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of September, 2005 CITY OF RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: By: Nelda Stroder, Mayor Kim Sutter, City Secretary Approved as to fonn and legality: Tim G. Sralla, Attorney Resolution No. 2005-064 Page 2 of2 e e tit e e t ;1 tl e e e e e e Marketing Plan e ('.. t ( Jet Powered Group . ~- ( 420 Throckmorton, Sune 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgroup.com "twentysix" - Marketing Plan -_.._-------._---_.._------------,...^._~~."------ August 10, 2005 growthJPG ;'twentysix!' - Marketing Plan August 10, 2005, Page 1 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. ( 7'· ( a< i~' ., \- <,- Jet Powered Group 420 Throckmorton. Suite 1110· Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgroup.com twentysix - Marketing Plan Table of Contents Executive Summa ry ........................................ ............... ... ..... ....... ....... .......... ...... .......... ...... ........ ..... ..... ..... ................ ..... .......... 3 Objectives an d Goals .............. ....... ......... .... ....... ...... .... ....... .... ..... .... ........ .... ........... ..... ..... ...... ...... ......... ..... ........... ..... .... ... ....... 6 Main Research Find ings .. ..... .... .... ....... .......... .... ... .... .................. ........ .... ................. .... ....... ..... .................. ... ........ .... .... ............ 6 Current Audience ......... ...... .... .............. ....... ..... ........ .... ..... ............ ..... ....... ..... ..... ..... ... .... ..... ..... .... ........ ..... .... ..... ........ .... ........... 8 Target Audience.. ..... .... ..... ..... ....... ....... ... ..... ........ .... ..... ..... ....... ..... ..... ..... .... ... ..... ....... .... ...... .......... ...... ..... ...... ..... ....... ..... ..... .... 8 Bra nd Strategy.. ....................................... ........................... ................ ....................... ................. ........ ........ ...................... ......... 9 Brand Identity. ...... ... ..... ....... ..... ..... ......... ... .............. ................. ..... ....... .......... ..... ............ ......... .... .... ......... ........ ..... ... 10 U rba n Design Vision ... ..... ...... .... ... ... .... ....... ..... ........ ....... ... ........ .... ....... .......... ................. ........ ............ .... ....... ..... .... 10 Name of th e Area... .... ..... ...... ...... .... ..... ..................... ............ .... ....... ..... ......... ....... ......... ..... ............ .... ....... .... ...... ..... 11 Na me of th e Hig hway .. .... ..... .... ...... ..... .... ...................... .... .... ....... ................. ....... ...... .... ..... .... ....... .... ................... ... 12 Logo an d Sales Collateral. .... .............. .... ........................ .... ..... .... ...... .... .... ...... .... .... ...... .... .... ...... ........ ......... ...... .... 12 e Commun ication Strategy .............. ................................ ................................... ................. .......... ................ ....... ......... ............ 14 C ommun icatio n Too Is.. ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ...... ...... .......... ........... ..... ..... .............. ... ..... ...... ...... ......... .... .......................... 14 Critical Success Factors ........ ............... ......... ..... ......... .... .......... .... ...... .......... .... .... ...... .... ............ ..... ...... .......... .... .................. 19 Tentative Project Plan . ............ ...... .... ...... ..... ..... .......... ......... .... ... ............. ...... .... ..... ....... ..... ... ........... ........ ........... ....... .... .... .... 20 egrowthJPG "twentysix" - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 2 Proprietary & ConfidentiaJ, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. ~.~.. Jet Powered Grou~ . ~ <-. 420 Throckmorton, Su~e 1110· Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgmup.com Executive Summary The main objectives of this marketing plan are: · Provide a branding strategy (name, logo, and sales collateral) · Provide a foundation for the marketing communication strategy To achieve these objectives, market research was conducted to understand the target audience and their needs. A survey was administered to citizens and stakeholders in the area south of Loop 820 including Glenview and Rufe Snow Drive. Focus groups were conducted to discover stakeholders' opinions on branding efforts, specifically on the new name of the area, name of the highway and vision of the project. The survey information was collected during February 2005 and the key findings indicate: · The community and stakeholders strongly agreed with the idea of revitalizing the area and giving it a complete facelift · The characteristics of the area should embrace the following concepts: Pedestrian- friendly, Contemporary, and Entertaining · They also agreed that a new name and logo is important for the future of the area · The community and stakeholders are looking for improvements on public property, such as: landscaping, decorative street lights, decorative street signs, and more public parks, green spaces, and open plazas · They also expressed the need to improve the pedestrian experience such as: renewed bike lanes, sidewalks and crosswalks; improved appearance of buildings and signs as well as more pedestrian amenities such as benches, trash receptacles, and sidewalk lighting growthJPG "twentysix" - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 3 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Powered Group, Inc. (~, a( ~ ." <- e _rowthJPG Jet Powered Grou~ 420 Throckmorton, Sune 1110· Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com The target audience for II twentysix" consists of: . People between 21 and 35 years old . Young professionals and couples who already have a family or are seeking to start a family To accomplish the branding objective, the selected urban vision, concept, name, logo and sales collateral were developed to create the desire among the target audience to visit, live and spend their money in the area. The name of the area constitutes the foundation for the communication strategy. The recommended name is "twentysix." "twentysix" was selected after several rounds of discussion and focus groups where more than 80 names where analyzed. The attributes of this name are the versatility, uniqueness, and its ability to provide opportunities for community involvement, as well as generate curiosity among the target market. The urban design vision for" twentysix" should convey a modem, mixed use, urban village characteristic with classic highway icons reshaped into a distinctive, entertainment-oriented theme. Changing the name of the road is crucial for the branding of the area. We recommend changing the name to "Boulevard 26", which had a great deal of acceptance in our focus groups. The name "boulevard" defines what the highway will be developed into; a wide, multi-lane arterial divided thoroughfare, often with an above-average appearance in terms of landscaping and scenery. A logo is a graphic representation of the name and twentysix cl1arac teris tics of the area; ¡t ~nlbod¡es gro\vth, excitement and community. "twentysìx' - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 4 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Powered Group, Inc. t~ . \-. (... growthJPG Jet Powered Group 420 Throckmorton, Suite 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com We recommend following a specific set of messaging objectives across the community, stakeholders, and target audience: · Create awareness of "twentysix" · Build the brand identity for "twentysix" · Motivate the community and stakeholders' support and involvement · Strengthen the loyalty of current local businesses buyers A comprehensive list of communication tools are recommended in the marketing plan, which includes a series of online activities, such as website, email, and newsletter; and offline activities such as community meetings, membership cards, events and volunteer programs. However, these programs have different roles as the !IlIlI1IJ ~,twfß~ i;;:~i~~~_1 f;o:v~'~,,~ ~~J l~~t~~~êj .-- ---w~~[ï--· . ,....... --...- .~., ,-..-. C~¡_··· ..,. ..~.-='=:~=~~'.."."~~.~ ......_....~. --.-.- '. ..' ~~~·~e·.··--·'_·"- ç-:~~ D~'etc{> ;:MP'e.....e~t ;·~e~~t Vt~QKit . DE,etq> ~~~ wpJ.~ Pf¡"t ~~Y@Iq> f I.'~f-"'.f. .::--:' ,..~ ~~,~~ét~~ r~é..,.,"t _f~e~"~.... :1;".ç~.i~~(·~t . ...-..... r~eMf"í l·~'Mf"t;._ development progresses over time. This tentative project plan provides a framework to refer when making tactical decisions on which programs to implement. :ùe(.:'-. !"~.\ ::. "1D.,)"" ¡.11' ~ --p;~~ ~;,~~õ~'_':=---·_·-·-·------·-----·_·----··Dt"flJ~·---_··· --r,,~~~r----'--~ . [.Vê)\t, C.aí.~""JQt' Dt~êlOÞ =~eMé~t. r~..ç-~1f\ ~~~~)¡o.~ I·~f~"'t r~e~"ì ,.~.~~~~~.~~.~~0.1~~.: ~ret.,-,. .__.___.._l'"~:.:e.~~ ..u.m..:..:~-=.=:~~.'- M~be~ C~J De\'êtOþ I:~eMê"t,. This marketing plan is the beginning of an exiting time for both cities. The implementation of the communication tools proposed in this document will significantly impact a true revitalization of the area. :'twentysix" - Marketing Plan \ August 1 0, 2005, Page 5 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Powered Group, Inc. / ('.-- \-': /' )..~ ( Jet Powered Group e« 420 Throckmorton, Sufte 1110· Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgmup.com Objectives and Goals The project's main objective is to drive new people to the community, rejuvenating the area and providing an improved neighborhood to the current residents. The objectives and goals of this marketing plan seek to contribute to the project's final expected results. The main objectives of this marketing plan are: · Provide a branding strategy (name, logo, and sales collateral) · Provide a foundation for the marketing communication strategy In addition to the marketing plan objectives, we also expect to reach the following goals: · Increase stakeholders investment e · Afuact the target market to the area · Create a sense of involvement from the community · Address the obstacles to a successful re-development from a marketing and branding perspective · Create a destination concept that increases commercial and residential traffic in the area · Strengthen Richland Hills and North Richland Hills' relationship with the stakeholder and community Main Research Findings Market research was conducted to better understand the "twentysix" target audiences and their needs. The survey was administered to citizens in the area south of Loop 820 including Glenview and Rufe Snow Drive. The findings of the research are based on 308 responses, which provide a confidence interval of 5% and a confidence level of 95%. In other words, we are 95% certain that in reality the results are within 5% of the sample results. _rowthJPG "twentysix" - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 6 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet PO'Nered Group, Inc. (' ~ ( '. Jet Powered Group . '... <. 420 Throckmorton, sune 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com The information was collected during February 2005 and the demographic distribution of the sample was statistically similar to the real universe distribution. The final research report is an integral part of the twenty six - branding binder, and it can be found on the second tab of the binder The key findings are the following: · The community and stakeholders agreed with the idea of revitalizing the area and agreed that a complete facelift needs to be made · They also agreed that a new name and logo is important for the future of the area · The community is not very familiar with the history of the area. Therefore this is not an aspect that should be emphasized through the communication message The community and stakeholders are looking for improvements that will satisfy needs such as shopping and entertainment, as well as improvements in public facilities including roads, and utilities. Additionally, they are also looking for improvements on the lifestyle of the area and surroundings such as: · Public property: landscaping improvements, decorative street lights, decorative street signs, and more public parks, green spaces, and open plazas · Pedestrian experience: improvements on bike lanes, sidewalks and crosswalks; improved appearance of buildings and signs as well as more pedestrian amenities such as benches, trash receptacles, and sidewalk lighting · Business/ commercial development improvements on retail stores such as grocery stores and. department stores, entertainment such as movie theaters, bowling, and recreational Cèllters; Clll.d. increased avaiL:lbility~ of ¡leig11borl~cod .tetail ser-"·/iccs such .1S dry cleaners, restaurants, and hair salons growthJPG "twentysix!' - Marketing Plan \. August 10, 2005, Page 7 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. í" at'(.· Jet Powered Group -'( 420 Throckmorton, Su~e 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com Current Audience It is important to differentiate between the current audience and the target audience. The current audience is composed of those who currently live in the area, while the target audience is composed of the people that" twentysix" is seeking to bring to the area. The main characteristics of the current community and the stakeholders are listed below. Community's characteristics: . The large majority of the community are citizens 35 years old or older with more than half of them among 35 and 54 years old (tl1e median age for the area is 32.5 years old) · Their annual income distribution is very diverse, with more than half of them below $79, 000 a year. e · The members of this group usually have a high disposable income, because they do not have additional codependents and they may have paid off their mortgages. As the area grows, it is expected to see an increase in the amount of younger population and starter families. Stakeholders' characteristics: · The stakeholders are predominantly males, with a large majority of them between 35 and 54 years old · They have higher annual income than the previous group, with more than half of the stakeholders with annual incomes of $100,000 or more. Target Audience The target audience for the "twentysix" is composed for those that the project seeks to bring into the area. As a result, this group, in addition to the stakeholders, will drive the branding "rowthJPG "twentysìx" - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 8 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. r'(- t(· Jet Powered Group . \~. (. 420 Throckmorton, Su~e 1110· Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgroup.com strategy and communication strategy for IItwentysix.11 The main characteristics of this target audience are the following: · This group is composed by people between 21 and 35 years old · They are young professionals and young couples who already have a family or are seeking to start a family; they want to raise their families in a safe place that has access to an energetic lifestyle and contemporary environment · They have a small household size, with or without children · They either rent a place or are first-time home buyers, therefore they are looking for a sense of community · They like to spend time with their families and friends Brand Strategy The main objective of the project is to drive new people to the community, rejuvenate the area and improve the neighborhood for the current residents. To accomplish these goals, the selected concept, name, logo and sales collateral were developed to be compelling to the target audiences. The branding components will create the desire among the target audiences to visit, live and spend their money in the area. Even though in the short run we have to persuade the stakeholders to come and invest their money to create this desired community and environment, in the long run, the designed concept and branding have to appeal to the young target audience. Therefore, we need to focus on them when making branding decisions. The American Marketing Association defines a brand as a name, sign, symbol, design, or a combination of them intended to identify the goods and/ or services of a seller or group of sellers and to differentiate them from their competitor's. Therefore, the "twentysix" brand strategy will entail the definition of its brand identity, logo and sales collaterals. growthJPG ·'twentysix!l - Marketing Plan \ August 10, 2005, Page 9 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet PO'Nered Group, Inc. ~~' i __ Jet Powered GrouQ e\·( 420 Throckmorton, Sutte 1110· Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgmup.com The details of the branding elements are an integral part of the twentysix - branding binder, and it can be found on the third tab of the binder Brand Identity Brand identity defines and describes its characteristics and personality. Therefore, the brand identity constitutes the foundation for the communication strategy. Thus, it is extremely important to understand the brand identity for /I twentysix". e The /I twentysix" should be associated with three main attributes based on the research findings. These attributes are: · Pedestrian-friendly · Contemporary · Entertaining Urban Design Vision The II twentysix" should convey a modem, mixed use, urban village characteristic, with classic highway icons reshaped into a distinctive, entertainment-oriented theme. The design should emphasize an upscale, urban-hip environment with "walkable" hardscaped parkways; close building setbacks, brick masonry emphasis, and traditional urban street furnishings. The design should also provide the sense of an energetic, super street environment with dynamic signage, bold lighting effects, parade and/ or festival accommodation and tastefully executed automobile-oriented development. The" twentysix" design characteristics previously mentioned show progress and growth, but at the same time they convey the message of a contemporary and fun small town with a sense of community. The characteristics also provide a sense of hope and bright future for _rowthJPG "twentysixll - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 10 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Powered Group, Inc. r'- ( (C· Jet Powered Group . \-. ( 420 Throckmorton, Su~e 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com the area. In addition, these design characteristics will contribute to the uniqueness of "twentysix" by providing an urban, contemporary look and feel that no other place in the Westside of the Metroplex can currently offer. "twentysix" will convey a very unique personality. If thinking about the IItwentysix" as a person, it should be perceived as a young, fun, and curious-driven person. It is someone who likes to experience and explore the world and what it has to offer. It should be perceived as someone who enjoys nature and modernity at the same time. The /I twentysix" is a person who enjoys having fun and spending time with friends and family. The details of the vision, concept and urban design elements are an integral part of the twentysix - branding binder, and they can be found on the fourth tab of the binder Name of the Area The name twenty six was chosen for several reasons. "twentysix" is versatile and highly adaptable. People can work with it and mold it for any developments. For example, people could say, "The Shops at twentysix," "Club 26" or "The Villages at'twentysix'." "twentysix" also generates curiosity and ambiguity. The people in our target audience are young professionals who continuously seek information and knowledge. The ambiguity of the name will make them curious and crave to know more about the area. The name is original. Very few places around the world are just called by a number. "twentysix" is unique and does not run the risk of being confused with other places. The name" twentysix" promotes community involvement and a sense belonging. The community can become involved in adapting the name and gaining a sense of togetherness, which would encourage them to take care of the area. This process would also help people unite the cities and integrate the members of the two communities. growthJPG ;'twentysix" - Marketing Plan .. August 10, 2005, Page 11 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. c( _t~..,..,.. .' ( Jet Powered Group 420 Throckmorton, Su~e 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgroup.com "twentysix" is hip and sparse. It is modem, but retro. The name invokes all of these characteristics at once making it perfect for the target market. Name of the Highway The current name of the highway is the South Grapevine Highway. Changing the name of the road is crucial for the branding of the area. Grapevine is often confused with this area due to the name. The recommendation of Boulevard 26 came from our focus groups' suggestion that the area be renamed to "twentysix," but not cause confusion when giving directions or addresses in the area. By calling the road "Boulevard 26", confusion will be minimized by separating the address and the name of the highway. The name Boulevard 26 was given a great deal of acceptance in our focus groups. The name "boulevard" is not overused and is more distinctive than others names such as "parkway" e or "highway". As a type of road, a boulevard usually consists of a wide, multi-lane arterial divided thoroughfare, often with an above-average appearance in terms of landscaping and scenery. In conclusion, the name "boulevard" defines what the highway will be developed into, and the name was widely accepted by the target audience. Logo and Sales Collateral twentysix Durillg tlle logo Jev'elopnlellc, clle tafget duJi~llLè' s ~vallt àI1J lleeJs were take11 il1tO consideration. As mentioned previously, the target audience consists of young professionals .rowthJPG "twentysix't - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 12 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. -('.' ~. ( .. Jet Powered Group . ~. (- 420 Throckmorton, Suite 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com and couples who have a family or are seeking to start one. These people are also looking for an exciting social environment as well as a sense of community. In other words, the target audience is looking for a place to grow with. The logo embodies these aspects of growth, excitement and community. The larger six coming out of diamond symbolizes the growth of the area. The diamond sitting on it's fulcrum creates a sense of movement. The logo itself is not static; thus, creating excitement. Finally, the accent band encompasses everything inside the diamond creating a communal feel by bringing everything inside of the logo together. The red or cayenne used is obviously an attention getter and a stimulant color. Using this as the accent color will deter the logo from sinking into the background. It is a very strong color. A little bit goes a long way. Small doses can often be more effective than large amounts of this powerful color. The sales collateral was developed to be distinctive, versatile and intriguing. 36" _._~---=i ~.,. .................. ............'" ..........).............,............. twentysix ~~ twpntySix ,_ t.oWd hoIò"" ........ _~_..._...... ....... , -.. ......_J ,." ..-..-..... 110ftt . Distinctive: We wanted to create something that would relay the uniqueness of the area. The 12"X12" size and the die cut differentiates this piece from most. The pocket growthJPG ~ .. -.1 ,~J~¡i~J.:JIJ\ - ¡dQII\C:;lj¡·i~ ,- ,~;·i \ August 10, 2005, Page 13 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. (-- <~ w I e( >~, ... ( \-.. Jet Powered Group 420 Throckmorton, Su~e 1110' Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000' www.jetpoweredgroup.com folder plays off of the angles and colors of the logo, drawing the reader's eye steadily throughout the entire piece. · Versatile: The pocket folder allows for a place to insert a business card and CD in the future. These and the two sleeves can accommodate future materials with ease. · Intriguing: The folder is laid out to reveal more and more as you progress. The cover only reveals "26". The next page reveals the entire logo, and the final inside layout contains all sales collateral materials. These aspects of the pocket folder return to the sense of creating curiosity towards the area. Communication Strategy Since the message to be conveyed to the current community must be consistent for the community, stakeholders and target audience we recommend following a specific set of messaging objectives across these groups: e · Create awareness of "twentysix" · Build the brand identity for" twenty six" · Motivate the community and stakeholders' support and involvement · Strengthen the loyalty of current local businesses buyers Communication Tools In general, the same communication vehicles will be effective to reach the community, stakeholders and the target audience. However, the way they are used and the message that will be communicated through them will have to be customized to each group. Below is a list of different tools that we recommend be implemented. · Website for "twentysix:" Maintains continuous and dynamic communication for the target audiences and the stakeholders. The website (www.twentysix.biz) addresses the community members, young professionals and stakeholders differently. _rowthJPG "twentysix" - Marketing Plan August 10, 2005, Page 14 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. .(- ~( Jet Powered Group . ~ (~- 420 Throckmorton, Suite 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com o All target audiences: The website provides news about 1/ twenty six, " project vision, project objectives, re-development phases, project virtual map, project information, dynamic pool surveys, and contact information. The website should also allow community members and stakeholders to address questions, ideas, and/ or concerns. o Community members and young professionals: It will present entertainment and shopping opportunities in the area, specials-offers, coupons and discounts. o Stakeholders: The site informs people about city support and investment opportunities as well as the project's financial expectations, reasons to invest, etc. o The website's list will be included in other forms of communication to make people aware it exists. · Flag: Design a flag for "twentysix" with the logo. The flag could be displayed throughout the area to serve as a landmark so people know where they are. It helps to promote a sense of community and reinforces the "twentysix" brand identity. · Media Kit and Press Release: Prepare a media kit to present to the media to encourage them to cover the project and promote the area. Provide visuals of the project with both images of what it looks like now, and what it will look like. A fact sheet about area and project, clear explanation on how the name was chosen and reasons why we think "twentysix" is the best name should be included as well. Anticipate the media and audience's questions and provide information sheets that answer all these potential questions. · Spokesperson: Select a spokesperson that people like and respect to talk to the community members and the stakeholders about the project and the benefits that IItwentysix" will bring to the community. · Town Hall meetings: Inform the target audiences about "tvventysix.1I Every change brings a reaction, which is normal because most people oppose change. So be honest growthJPG ;'t\Nentysix" - Marketing Plan " August 10, 2005, Page 15 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. r..(' t r \-n < ... ( .. ì='''.. ." \. Jet Powered Group 420 Throckmorton, Suite 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgroup.com e and accessible to any questions, comments, or concerns that the community may have. This will help to make them feel you are open to them, and they will be more likely to embrace the new name and develop a positive view of the area as a result. You should hold separate town meetings for community members, young professionals and stakeholders because the focus of the talk will be different in each. The spokesperson should participate in these meetings to develop visibility and to be actively involved with the target audiences. · Print ads in newspapers, magazines, and billboards throughout the cities of the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex: To afuact young professionals, young families as well as to promote the new development, increase awareness of the area, generate interest and to visit and shop in the area. Ensure that the ads are adapted to the target audience of each particular publication or broadcast vehicle. · Periodic informational e-mails: This monthly communication strategy should mention key points about the project, its progress, news in the area and information about upcoming events for all the target audiences. o Community members and young professionals: E-mails will keep people updated of news and new developments creating awareness and increasing interest and involvement in the project. o Stakeholders and investors: Leverage and embrace business relationships through frequent communication to access sponsorship opportunities. In return, the investors should get discounts at area stores or other incentives to encourage them to invest. These sponsorships could be used for the different activities, to help maintain the area and to promote a sense of community within the area. · Direct mail campaigns: To promote the audience's involvement with "twentysix.11 In the last U.s. census, only half of Americans reported having access to the Internet. Direct mail campaigns are the ideal medium to reach this segment of the audience _rowthJPG "twentysix" - Marketing Plan August 10, 2005, Page 16 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet PO'Nered Group, Inc. ,'.. (". . ('f Jet Powered Group 420 Throckmorton, Su~e 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com that typically includes the elderly, slow adapters to the Internet or people with no access to the Internet. · Short promotional video: To promote the area to the local community, potential new visitors and potential investors. Even though we are using the same method to target these three groups, it is important to develop videos with different messages for each audience. The promotional video can be displayed at city halls, on local TV channels, local events, and during meeting with potential investors. The video should provide a visual idea of how /I twentysix" looks now and a projection of how it will look upon the project's completion. It could also explain how the cities plan to support the project and business owners. In addition, it could mention the benefits that the 1/ twentysix" will bring to the community and the local businesses including growth expectations for the area, increased market opportunities, improved household income, increased employment rate and new housing and retail development. · Monthly event calendar: This calendar should include family oriented activities such as festivals, parades, concerts, Easter egg hunts and others to create interest and community involvement in the area. Although the calendar should focus on family- oriented activities, it should also provide opportunities for the different segments of the population. The website, e-mails and direct mail pieces should be used to communicate activities for the upcoming month. · Use a speaker bureau, involvement with advocacy organizations, and direct mail to educate the community on the progress of the project. · "twentysix Membership Card:" Provide" twentysix" membership cards that will give discounts and special deals for multiple businesses in the area to community members to encourage re-occurring customers. A "twentysix Membership Card" could be like a grocery store's membership card. Residents interested in being part of the "twentysix Club" could sign up for the card at the City Halls or participating stores. Name, address, and e-mail address should be collected during the registration process. This growthJPG ;'twentysix" - Marketing Plan , August 10, 2005, Page 17 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. (- <~. j"'. ( e\( Jet Powered Group 420 Throckmorton, Su~e 1110· Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgroup.com information could later be used to send emails, newsletters, and direct mail pieces (communicational tools previously explained). . Free monthly publication: This publication should include articles related to /I tw entys ix, II a calendar of events, redevelopment progress updates, and coupons for area's businesses to inform and promote activity within the area. The publication should be provided at local stores and the city facilities. . Information sessions with the community: Conduct information sessions with the stockholders and community members aimed at informing community members about the project, its progress, and the benefits that the project will bring to the community. During these sessions, stakeholders should also get community members' feedback about new ideas, problems, complaints and suggestions for improvement These sessions can be promoted through e-mails.directmails.printed ads, the free monthly publication and the website. e · Volunteer programs: To create responsibility of certain projects, create a sense of ownership, encourage community belonging and community involvement. The cities and the project committee should decide which aspects of the re-development project would be opened to volunteers (for example, some tasks related to the landscape improvements or some tasks related to the monthly events). Then, volunteers meeting should be organized to identify groups and to assign responsibilities. Depending upon the timeline for each task, follow-up meetings should be scheduled with the groups. . Monthly or bimonthly meetings: To bring together the stakeholders, architects and construction teams together to address issues such as traffic patterns, parking requirements, geo-technical considerations, and any new necessary re-developments and adaptations. _rowthJPG "twentysix" - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 18 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet PO'Nered Group, Inc. (-. ,eC" Jet Powered Group 420 Throckmorton, Suite 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com · Meetings: Individual and group meetings the community and stakeholders. To address stakeholder's concerns, inform them about the project, offer them investment incentives, and provide them with development updates. · Grants opportunities: Involve stakeholders, community leaders and organizations in obtaining grants for improvement projects and other initiatives. Critical Success Factors It is extremely important to have a clear understanding of the critical success factors of this project. All branding and communication decisions need to reinforce these success factors to ensure the project's expected outcomes are reached. Below is a list of the critical success factors for the project · Build and maintain a strong relationship between stakeholders, community members and young professionals · Ensure continuous and honest communication flow between the cities, the architecture and construction team, the stakeholders and the community · Reinforce the cities' business-friendly attitude · Implement a continuous and consistent communication plan throughout the project timeline · Finally, it will be extremely important to implement follow-up market research to measure the brand equity for "twentysix." A year or two after the project's completion, a market research survey should be implemented to measure the stakeholders and the community's brand awareness, brand loyalty, brand associations, and perceived quality. This market research will determine if the branding and communication goals defined in this marketing plan were achieved. It will also identify whether or not the brand identity defined in this marketing plan was growthJPG "twentysix:' - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 19 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Powered Group, Inc. ... \ ( ~ e< e Jet Powered Group 420 Throckmorton, Suite 1110 · Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000 · www.jetpoweredgroup.com properly conveyed to the target audiences. Lastly, this follow-up market research will provide a foundation to future marketing plans and communication strategies. Tentative Project Plan I twmt$ ~¡~~~êl! r~~~l~ê:t~~ ~~~ ~~ê ~ ______________ £: 2-. ~ :J _ ___~ Wêb~,te ..._..._.....!::~::.~__. . ._....__ ___-.-- ...~~~~. ..._ ____ .. ~Gi~J.~.. ......-..---_..... ..-. ."....-,....---..-. ~ ...-.......-,. ........-- - . "'---" _.-- - _.--- '" ~\~ I>êYêl~ r~êMêkt r~ê~~t -~-~-,,~ '. _.." ....._.....~~~í__._.. ._.... . __~====- ._~~~~_==--==---====~.=========.~~~=:~:=:=-~=--======-________=~~:!_,,_.==--____. P"-íl\t, Ads ..~.____ pêve~~ I r~~~-t:,,____. _,_._" ,. ,.~.._,.._......_.",............__...."'_,.._..~.".._...____,,....~_, ._. '_,__. ..............".., _._____" '_,___ .._......_____ ,,,~,._.~.__~__,,____,,__ _.... __~.. .... _.,_,-....~ _ _.____ ,_ ,._ '. .___."""- __ ............,_ ~_.~ ......,. _. ._..__...~~.._............_ ___............, ...~ ,~__ ~_,,_. ____..f·_ ._______-...-~__,......_.. ..y.,__...._~ "'_ T~ ¡t~l Y\êê~~ r~e~t r~~~________~_____.____/¡ ç~~~~~==~~====~~~ Pt'~~OJ\i Vt~ê" DêV~~ r~a~~t·· ~~~~r~;¡~.:I; .... . ._-====--,c~=-~-::-:::===, --D¡vê!~~-~~~=· ==;::;":;r~~~t~;-c:;;~·· ' ':-i~£~lki ~~lk~ ~Po\ê~t__-=-~ê~~t__._~~=~= v~~:¿¡ér -py~~- - -----~'-Dévêl;;p-·---···-- -." --'f~é;;;~r--"-'- --.-. ...-."--. ~~bêfSL\ip c~~ ___'.~."'U-W'~~'_W>."~".".,"_,. _~.._..~_. _«.~~V~~".P ..~>__ _,. l'~~~t, . e growthJPG "twentysìx" - Marketing Plan August 1 0, 2005, Page 20 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Powered Group, Inc. e e e I tr·n I It e e . 1 t entysix ~ 2 Qj "C o ..r:::. Q ..J N .-- e e e twentysix e e e I en ·SIX TH E LOGO . .. .. .. . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . . . .. .. . .. . . ..... . .. . . .. .... ... . ... ... . .. ... . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . Page 1 GRAPHICS AND lOGO SPACING ................................................................................. Page 2 SIZE REST!RICTIONS ... ............. .... ... ............ .......... .... ...... ...... ........ ....... ................ .... ...... Page 3 UNACCEPTABLE USES .... .......... ......... .................. ......... ..... ..... .............. ................. ..... Page 4 COlOiR RiEPRODUCTION .............. ...... ..... .... .......... ..... .......... ... ...'. ......... .... .... ... ... ......... . Page 5 SCRE'EN MIXES ....... ............. ............................. ...... ...... ....... .... ... ........... ..... ... ... ........ ..... . Page 6 lOGO FilES ............... ....... .......... ......... .............................. ......... ........ ...................... ...... Page 7 lOGO VERSIONS .......... .................. ..... ....... ............ .... .......... ..... ......... ............. .............. Page 8 ~ntysix twentysix A visual identity system can only be effective if the organization maintains the logo's integrity. This is achieved by consistently applying the visual identity guidelines to everything that identifies 26 I twenty.ix. These items may include stationery, signage, advertising, promotional materials and publications . Through proper application we can guarantee that the logo unifies all city endeavors in a way that is unique and recognizable to it's audience. To ensure correct usage of the 26 I twentyslx mark, refer to this manual and use only approved artwork contained on the CD. For more information or to obtain additional art files, contact the Jet Powered Group at 817.288.5000 1 e e or as entities. When the word twentysix is used alone, the line that goes away. The addition of distinction. Its and for any visual communication and process To measure white space, measure the of the "A" and that distance as shown. BODEGA SANS 1 e BODEGA SANS BOLD 2 ~~~~ The minimum size of the logo is displayed above. Minimum size width is 3/4" or .7511 3 e - - STRETCHED LOGO CONDENSED LOGO OUTLINED LOGO The ALTERED LOGO ALTERED COLORS NO CONTRAST IN BACKGROUND above show obvious misuse of the 4 Pantone Color (Printed on coated stock) Pantone 194 C Pantone Black Pa ne Color (Printed on uncoated stock) Pantone 1945 U Pantone Black twentysix 00/0 screen) RGB (100°10 screen) K = 0 K = 1 00 (100°10 screen) K = 0 K = 1 00 screen) AGB colors and files that use CMYK will not always match Pantone Colors on printed material. For best results and most accurate color representation use Pantone Colors whenever possible. The following Pantone* Colors when printing on a coated or glossy stock are recommended: . · For Black, use Pantone Black The following Pantone* Colors when printing on a uncoated or glossy stock are recommended: . · For Black, use Pantone Black The colors shown throughout this manual are not intended to match the Pantone* Color Standards. The non-Pantone* colors listed in this manual are not equivalent to the Pantone* colors listed and should not be cross-referenced: Pantone is a registered trademark of Pantone Inc. 5 e e e Pantone Coated Pantone 194C Pantone Black Pantone Uncoated Pantone 1945U Pantone Black PantoneBlack twentysix i 1000/0 Pantone Black Pantone Black t ientysix i 1000k Pantone Black 6 COLOR t entysix BLACK & WHITE Logos come in two available styles. Color and Black & White 7 e e e · High Resolution file · For viewing on any monitor · Small file size allows for quick emalling · These flies are strictly for Web based applications · Do not use this file type for printed collateral · High Resolution file · Can be imported into a variety of software programs for use in printed collateral · Computers without proper software may not be able to open these flies · TIFs are large in file size · File has qualities and can be imported into some applications · File Is Imported Into Powerpolnt with a background. This allows color backgrounds to be placed behind logo and seal · Can be enlarged to any size without loss in quality · Can be Imported into most software applications · File can be easily modified · File has qualities · File is built using three colors to allow for more economical printing · Always send this file type to printers, sign makers and any other vendor providing printed applications · File Is imported Into Microsoft Word. Every possible file version for the logo has been provided on CD. 8 tit 420 Throckmorton, Suite 1110· Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.288.5000· www.jetpoweredgroup.com Urban Design - Theming Concepts During the course of the study, Concept Alternatives were prepared which explore potential physical design arrangements and characteristics. These were used to inform the anding, particularly to illustrate opportunities in c arison to the documented Existing Conditions of the corridors. This process ena the b ding to be grounded in the preferred design, thereby lending continuity of purpose to bo the Brand and physical design of the District. The initial Concept Alternatives evaluated are as follows: Urbanna - A design theme convey· a modern, mixed use, urban village characteristic. Design emphasis is on an upscale, urban-hip environment with "W able" hardscaped parkways, close building setbac , brick masonry emphasis, and modem urban street furnishings. e Route 26 - A design theme that translates classic highway icons into a dis ctive, entertainment-oriented environment. An energetic, super-street environment with dynamic signage, bold lighting effects, parade and/ or festiv accommodation and ornamental grasses serving as a transition to tastefully execute, automobile-oriented development. Ecos - A design theme maximizing greenery and concentrated garden pockets with a City G en character. This translates to a transitional urban to suburban boulevard environment that emphasizes detail design treatments, soft earth tone ors, traditional furnishings, natural/ recycled materials with a sense of privacy in developments. Following review of these alternatives in concert with the Brand names, it was determined to pursue an updated version of Route alternative. The recommended heme adopted the preferred Brand name of / This concept and the initial alternatives are documented on the following illustrative p s. Based on the preferred Twenty-Six / 26 Concept, design concepts were developed for prototypical streetscape elements that support the selected theme. These are also summarized in the following illustrative pages as well. In general, these elements reflect a modem update of classic roadway oriented design elements. They are inten to achieve a distinctive family of streetscape elements that aid in differentiating and defining the corridor as a stinct place. concepts, they focus on general characteristics, componentry, scale and distribution. A palette of colors is suggested for repetition throughout the corridor elements. These colors apply themselves well to the various components in a variety of materials and can be impJemented through a flexible strategy of phase improvements. I design refinement of these elements and phasing strategies will occur with subsequent phases of implementation. e August 11, 2005 , Page 1 Proprietary & Confidential, Copyright © 1999 - 2005. The Jet Poværed Group, Inc. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Fire Council Meeting Date: 09-12-2005 Subject: Adoption of National Incident ManaQement System (NIMS) Agenda Number: GN 2005-093 -Resolution No. 2005-065 Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) 5, Management of Domestic Incidents, directed the Department of Homeland Security to develop and administer the National Incident Management System (NIMS). The National Incident Management System provides a consistent nationwide approach for Federal, State, territorial, tribal and local governments to work effectively and efficiently together to prepare for, prevent, respond to, and recover from domestic incidents, regardless of cause, size, or complexity. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued" the National Incident Management System to provide a comprehensive national approach to incident management, applicable to all jurisdictional levels and across functional disciplines. On February 23, 2005 Texas Governor Perry issued Executive Order RP 40 which adopted the National Incident Management System as the statewide system to be used for emergency prevention, preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation activities, as well as· in support of all actions taken to assist local entities. The US Department of Homeland Security has issued recommended steps that State, territorial, tribal, and local entities should take during FY 2005 to become compliant with the National Incident Management System. The adoption and compliance with the National Incident Management System is essential to ensuring full and robust preparedness across the State of Texas and also ensures that the City of North Richland Hills will continue to remain eligible for future federal monies in the form of grants, disaster relief and mitigation funds. See the attached fact sheets describing NIMS Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2005-065 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Avai a e Budget Manager ~)g'~IQaI Department ead Sign ture Æ- e e e Resolution No. 2005-065 Whereas, Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) 5, Management of Domestic Incidents, directed the Department of Homeland Security to develop and administer the National Incident Management System (NIMS); and Whereas, the National Incident Management System provides a consistent nationwide approach for Federal, State, territorial, tribal and local governments to work effectively and efficiently together to prepare for, prevent, respond to, and recover from domestic incidents, regardless of cause, size, or complexity; and Whereas, on March 1, -2004, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued the National Incident Management System to provide a comprehensive national approach to incident management, applicable to all jurisdictional levels and across functional disciplines; and Whereas, Governor Perry issued Executive Order RP 40 on February 23, 2005, adopting the National Incident Management System as the statewide system to be used for emergency prevention, preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation activities, as well as in support of all actions taken to assist local entities; and Whereas, the US Dep.artment of Homeland Security has issued steps that State, territorial, tribal, and local entities should take during FY 2005 to become compliant with the National Incident Management System; and Whereas, the implementation of and compliance with the National Incident Management System is critical to ensuring full and robust preparedness across our state. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HEREBY RECOGNIZES AND FORMALLY ADOPTS THE NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES. Passed this 12th day of September 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, Attorney The National Incident Management System e Fact Sheet for Emergency Response Agencies Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 To prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks, major disasters, and other emergencies, the United States Government shall establish a single, comprehensive approach to domestic incident management. The objective of the United States Government is to ensure that all levels of government across the Nation have the capability to work efficiently and effectively together, using a national approach to domestic incident management. e What is the National Incident Management System, or NIMS? The NIMS is... Core set of Doctrine Concepts Principles Terminology Organizational processes Applicable to all hazards The NIMS is not... An operational incident management plan A resource allocation plan A terrorism/WMD-specific plan Designed to address international events The NIMS has Six Components 1. Command Management 2. Preparedness 3. Resource Management 4. Communications and Information Management 5. Supporting Technologies 6. Ongoing Management and Maintenance e 1. Command and Management The NIMS standardizes incident management for all hazards and across all levels of government. The NIMS-standard incident command structures are based on three constructs: Incident Command System Multi-agency Coordination Systems Public Information Systems 2. Preparedness The NIMS establishes specific measures and capabilities that jurisdictions and agencies should develop and incorporate into an overall system to enhance operational preparedness for incident management on a steady-state basis in an all hazards context. e e e The operational preparedness of our nation's incident management capabilities is distinct from the preparedness of the individual citizens and private industry. 3. Resource Management The NIMS defines standardized mechanisms to describe, inventory, track, and dispatch resources before, during, and after an incident; it also defines standard procedures to recover equipment once it is no longer needed for an incident. 4. Communications & Information Management Effective communications, information management, and information and intelligence sharing are critical aspects of domestic incident management. The NIMS communications and information systems enable the essential functions needed to provide a common operating picture and interoperability for incident management at all levels. 5. Supporting Technologies The NIMS promotes national standards and interoperability for supporting technologies to successfully implement the NIMS, as well as standard technologies for specific professional disciplines or incident types. It provides architecture for science and technology support to incident management. 6. Ongoing Management and Maintenance The DHS will establish a multi-jurisdictional, multi-disciplinary NIMS Integration Center. This Center will provide strategic direction for, and oversight of, the NIMS, supporting both routine maintenance and the continuous improvement of the system over the long term. The NIMS Integration Center will facilitate the development and promulgation of the standards addressing the components ofNIMS. All users and stakeholders-including various levels of government, functional disciplines, and private entities-will be given the opportunity to participate in the NIMS Integration Center activities. \. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 9/12/05 Subject: Approve Revision to the Little Bear Creek Corridor - Ordinance No. 2849 Agenda Number: GN 2005-094 Section 102-223 in the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances pertains to the Little Bear Creek Corridor (LBCC). The LBCC was established by ordinance in 1996 to preserve land along Little Bear Creek for flood control. This land was also identified on the City's Trail System Master Plan and Park System Master Plan as future trail and park sites. The ordinance allowed the property owners to reclaim property located within the limits of the LBCC with appropriate improvements and engineering studies indicating that the ultimate 1 OO-year flood plain could be reduced. During the past few years the developer that owns property adjacent to Little Bear Creek has been developing his property. Subdivisions such as Forest Glenn East, Phase II and Forest Glenn West, Phases II and III have either been constructed or designed. These new subdivisions have included drainage improvements that have allowed the Little Bear Creek Corridor limits to be revised. This ordinance amends Section 102-223 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances and adopts a new Little Bear Creek boundary map. Every other part of the ordinance remains the same. The existing and proposed corridor limits are shown on the attached map. Recommendation: To approve Ordinance No. 2849. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds ÄvallaDle Finance Director J 11 -I C:Ç f---¡--- ~ l {)~ ~..- # ' J Department Head Signature ~. .~ '" / .... '. . Budget Director , J )~~{~ City Manag r· gnature / ! Page 1 of _ ........-~~ ?§;..~¡~~* ~~:' =j ~.íoÞ\ i~~ ¡..¡~ \~~ \";~¡%1';'JJ/ ":~t~~~¿ c;o-t-6 ~3111" liW SNOISSIWNnS1SNOISIMY "ON mll~t IÐ:I.T "5ß!TT PØ11Pn11pJOI\ ~8 cMxr, 'f" IO(L slI!H PLmIIl:)!}[ LpJ0NjO At!:::> JOP!JJO:) pasodOJd SVX:U S"IH ONV'1H:)IH HJ.~ON ~OaIHHO~ )(33~~ ~\i3a 31.U.11 ~8 p't- b~ ~ 0 i j~ ..::=;.~ E ........, .~_. .......-- _Jt- "Pa ~ fiu! og UlI (3uµaeU!õUEl S~AI\ 1'/\1:;:) . . ~ d CL) bO CL) ~ , , I \ I , \ , \~ : Ie::; }C)O\ zo ¡::æ We:: ~8 EJ . C> z ¡::CI) ~t- XO W...J c w (/) o Cl.(/) Ot- 0::0 Q..-I ) l peo~ aU~l ~~U~~aJd . · 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 · 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 · 42 ORDINANCE NO. 2849 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 102-223 OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CODE OF ORDINANCES AND ADOPTING A NEW LITTLE BEAR CREEK BOUNDARY MAP. WHEREAS, the Little Bear Creek Boundary Map establishes the 100 year flood plain limits for Little Bear Creek which in turn limits development within such area; and WHEREAS, new data and infonnation requires revisions to such map to more precisely define such 100 year flood plain; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1 : THAT Section 102-223 of the North Richland Hills Code of Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 102-223. Delineation of area where regulations apply. The regulations of this article shall be applicable to all new subdivisions and resubdivisions within the corporate city limits which are located in and within 150 feet of the Little Bear Creek fully developed 100-year flood plain limits and its tributaries as identified on the Little Bear Creek Boundary Map. All references within this Code of Ordinances to the Little Bear Creek Boundary Map shall be deemed to mean the Little Bear Creek Corridor, Proposed Corridor, dated 11-26- 04 on file in the office of the North Richland Hills Public Works Department." AND IT IS SO ORDAINED. Passed and approved this 10th day of September, 2005. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Oscar Trevino, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary . 2 4 6 8 10 12 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: }VL:lP C~ ~i:4' Mike Curtis, Director, Public Works APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: George A. Staples, Attorney . . - e - Announcements and Information September 12, 2005 Announcements The Parks & Recreation Department will host a Family Fun Night on September 16 at Linda Spurlock Park. This free event begins at 7 p.m. Residents are encouraged to walk or ride their bikes to the park at 6400 Glenview Drive. Please call 817-427-6600 for more information. The NRH Library will hold its annual Book Sale on Saturday, September 24 from 9:00 a.m. to 4: 00 p.m. Hardcover books will be sold for one dollar, while paperbacks will be priced at twenty five cents each. Additional 'items . for sale include a limited number of videos, CDs, audio cassettes and books on tape. For more information, please call 817-427-6814. Residents are invited to see the newest North Richland Hills Fire Station on Saturday, September 24. A dedication ceremony and open house for the new Fire Station No.4 will begin at 8: 15 a.m. The station is located at 7245 Hightower Drive. For more information, please contact the Fire Department at 817 -427 -6900. Kudos Korner Every Council Meeting, we spotlight our employees for the great things they do. Staff, N RH Recreation Center A letter was received from a resident thanking the staff and exercise instructors at the Recreation Center for helping her regain her strength and stability when recovering from illness and surgery. The resident attributed her success to the Silver Sneakers class and said the Recreation Center is the best way to take care of your health.