The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1997-09-02 Agendas CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS Office of the City Secretary CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA SEPTEMBER 2,1997 - 6:00 P.M. For the CityCouncil'Work Session conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall in the Pre-Council Room, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 6:00p.m. The below listed items are, placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: 1. Water and Wastewater Impact Fees gat;tlðtri~ City Secretary POSTED ____~__~1-C)2._ __q~ 3=?-I!-111___ lIme City Se~ ~é?~ P.O. Box 820609 * North Richland Hills, Texas * 76182-0609 USA 7301 Northeast Loop 82()' * 817 -581-5502 * FAX 817-581-5516 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Public Works Department WATER & WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES September 2, 1997 Pre - Council Room 6:00 P.M. 1. Introduction (Larry Cunningham) 2. General Overview of Impact Fees in NRH (Randy Shiflet) 3. Legal Requirements (Randy Shiflet) 4. Fort Worth Impact Fees (Randy Shiflet) 5. Uses of Impact Fees (Randy Shiflet) 6. Development of the Updated Capital Improvements Plan and Amended Impact Fees (Greg Dickens) 7. Performance of the Impact Fee Program 1990 to 1996 (Greg Dickens) 8. CIP Study Results (Greg Dickens) 9. Recommendations (Greg Dickens) ■ • + � ■III` � � 1111111�11uo II 1 .. . WE Pro. a,,� !� y lku. : IIIII Y _— t 111 ■1 ■ _ � 'i:iii' ,�• ' 7 � �y:. 1 •i2_ . ( 1 I - tiAl ' °H'I:Cu.:�� I� ^:':;• ��:.� :.. • �1� �wi s = .�.,�� ::�- ::1:::$:•9' — :::F° i"1 ,,.F_: .�.5 I 111 !111 51,i_ •- }?_ �1.. 9t..; L.. • in•In15 — _ � ai_ °i- II i a ': ,.. . .. , . f _ _. F'�'��. -: a L.,'u n £? i i? i .. 2�i ■ I . i i I � s:,. -,e�l'1•Pl1;° aeuc ,;,�. "r,' 3 x.,t, t _ . - - � j,, - �- lit "y'�: - �!:'" - f ___ .t;,;..*, 4,. :rte ::::: �'.•. •;Ili ILA JI n, r, • :fin F:i� 1 _,_ _____ _ _____ ___ ll riiiiiin� - . ie'• 1 "c: %.e.. 1 ;•�:�7 �!: _ : :.4:1: _ n`3' __ - - ' J;fi.: 1� >:1• �- III �1 11- - - •! 7 eie . , .� _IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII:i %!imlP �" _ r zt1111111111 111111111111.'IIII�' G1�0�::. ~ ", ^ ^'aa',� ? � ' ��uuu - n ■non Iwmnm - ;:x3 �9 I '�� i�:,•� '__ail' "e - ,l1 �Y �..;,��. _ 9 ,_ �/1 �� •�', .(( ":' I�• _■ . ' 11i, .r' it 'SI:R _ - : '�+.' - �,....: .•� s, �u s" -- _ __ ,� 1!1!1 '1� ".',:' " ". °' •.'_uimm_ - � \•'.u'! ■.��• ■1 • 11 f� %Ia1>AI .�w_ - �1'. ��1i :'.ii: '�j�� ! 1 • . _tea — =•� : -- - �7� <��_'_'; -� =�.:: ::: _ °:��l��:�y�r� 11 .li: T s: - � �1 ' 13.E ''','•�tla.. .,,.,,' .�h:,: t,• _ CGFIi._ - � 1. ]i.ii► �� -': :�: ■�� ` I �::�f;� ME IRS ..' � I:I�IIIIIIIIIII_,; =;,�= - E:= 'i ° =�•= = =!� 'll�■■ �� 1>_ •1111. 1 IIII • _ - • �. = may: - ='_' _ � � ?`� ';;r,' � - :mod'_ #r � J - 3 '�, "?' ' ' --_ it °/ ■ n i 3 „° i. 3s'! . � 77: � nuS • .C— nnnt17M1 I 1111 1111111 - •� • 111111 / 1 1 �I - - ” "' "- r % nn na■ VIII 111111111111 . =IIIII 111111 Via' .,��:__ Ills =11111 1:1111�__.�� "•: =', - r', :;;; �i� �il�m�1 �1111111111_I;� .; � �� " �;;;; , 1:_11 °- - - 11111111 ;Bnlr ■11: � � �I.i •:�• �' __ -= : . . • • . �iiiiiiiiiii ii � "' n �� - Y � •' I 3i 1"1[' EXHIBIT #2 Impact Fee Reimbursement Example: Area to Be Developed PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXTENSION - 1,000 LF of 10 inch P i P e EXISTING WATER Le ACME STREET The Developer of Tract `A' will be required to extend approximately 1,000 linear feet of proposed 10 inch water main. The water main extension is included in the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan. The cost of the extension is $45,000. A City - Developer Agreement is signed and the City reimburses the Developer up to 73.38% of the cost of the improvements shown in the CIP. The Developer therefore receives a reimbursement of: 0.7338 x $45,000 = $33,021 CAmsoffice\winword \data \exhiU. doc EXHIBIT #3 NRH and FORT WORTH Combined Maximum Impact Fee Schedule Equivalency Water Wastewater Meter Size Factor Impact Fee Impact Fee 5/8" x 3/4" or 1.00 $ 2,751.00 $ 2 3/4" 1 " 1.67 $ 4,594.33 $ 3,552.39 1-1/2" 3.33 $ 9,160.67 $ 7,082.61 2" 5.33 $ 14,662.67 $ 11,336.61 Y 10.00 $ 27,510.00 $ 21,270.00 4 16.67 $ 45,859.33 $ 35,457.39 6" 33.33 $ 91,690.67 $ 70,892.61 8 53.33 $146,710.67 $113,432.61 10" 76.67 $210,919.33 $146,363.33 c:\ msoffice \winword \data\exhib3.doc City of North Richland Hills Water & Sewer Impact Fees Balances as of June 30, 1997 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Totals Previous Balance $397,771 $538,778 $807,594 $396,036 $409,051 Revenues: Water Impact Fees $184,783 $194,416 $137,954 $174,186 $90,401 $1,146,469 Sewer Impact Fees 58,897 61,800 44,160 62,916 24,862 361,620 Interest Received 15,078 22,136 37,300 20,358 14,866 139,982 Total Revenues 258,758 278,352 219,415 257,461 130,129 Total Available 656,529 817,129 1,027,009 653,497 539,180 1,648,071 Expenses: Water Projects 22,110 632 525,363 205,830 78,453 871,581 Sewer Projects 95,641 8,903 105,610 38,615 24,727 340,490 Total Expenses 117,751 9,535 630,973 244,446 103,180 1,212,071 Cash Balance Forward $538,778 $807,594 $396,036 $409,051 $436,000 $436,000 Water Income $174,106 $210,581 ($359,153) ($16,688) $23.607 $344.879 Sewer Income (33.100) 58.236 (52,405) 29.703 3.342 91,121 Tats! IgcQrtre $141 $268,816 ($411,558) $13.015 $26,949 $436,000 Net Income Check Figure: $141,007 $268,816 ($411,558) $13,015 $26,949 Interest Water % 0.7583 0.7588 0.7575 0.7346 0.7843 Allocation Sewer % 0.2417 0.2412 0.2425 0.2654 0.2157 rn 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 1 Reconciliation: x Bal per G/L $536,967 $807,804 $396,036 $409,050 $435,999 G/L Adj 1,810 (210) 0 0 0 T Adj G/L 538,777 807,594 396,036 409,050 435,999 W_ Bal per rpt 538,778 807,594 396,036 409,051 436,000 -I Difference ($0) ($0) ($0) IMPACT FEE COMPARISON - ACTUAL TO ALLOWABLE Exhibit #5 During the initial Impact Fee calculation in 1990, it was estimated that a maximum allowable fee of $704 for Water and $233 for Sewer for each MUE could be charged under the provisions of Chapter 395, Local Government Code. Rather than levy and collect the estimated maximum rate allowable, the City Council of North Riceland Hills chose to set a rate of $362 for Water and $112 for Sewer for each MUE. This decision was made to preclude any possibility of overcharging customers because of inaccurate growth or expense estimates during the ten year period 1990 through 2000. In reviewing the actual growth rate and actual expenses for the three year period being examined, plus the initial three years calculations performed by Reed - Stow & Co., during March, 1993, it is quite clear that the Impact Fees being charged by the city are considerably below those allowed by Chapter 395, Local Government Code. Our calculations, based on the above actual operating results would document that the City of North Richland Hills could have charged Impact Fees of $619.00 for Water and $368.00 for Sewer. These ees were calculated after removing the value of developer contributed expenses from the total expenses discussed above. Developer contributed expenses can not be considered when calculating Impact Fees to be charged. The amount of developer contributions removed before the above calculations were $606,302 for Water and $122,689 for Sewer. Our detailed analysis consisted of reviewing documents related to the initial six year period of the Capitol Improvements Plan and the system growth that occurred during that period. We made no attempt to estimate the expenses or growth for the four years remaining in the Capitol Improvements Plan due to the sale of a portion of the Utility System to Watauga. This sale has brought about the requirement of a new Land Use Assumption Plan, a new Capital Improvements Plan and the development of updated Impact Fees. The results of those studies and calculations will be presented to the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee and the City Council at a later date according to the mandates of Chapter 395, Local Government Code. In preparing this review and analysis, RMS, Inc. did not perform any detailed audit functions relating to the data. The data contained in this review and analysis was gathered from reports and source documentation provided by the employees of the City of North Richland Hills. As such, we make no representation as to their completeness and /or accuracy, but would state that the records relating to Impact Fees are quite well kept. Should we be able to provide additional information or documentation, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. Respectfully, RMS, Inc. r-r- RirharH Alhin KFF Fnnineers EXHIBIT #6 NRH PROPOSED PORTION OF TOTAL IMPACT FEE i MAXIMUM WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE METER SIZE EQUIV. FACT. WATER SEWER TOTAL 3/4 Inch 1.00 $1,952 $1,110 $3,062 1 Inch 1.67 $3,260 $1,854 $5,114 1-1/4 Inch 2.77 $5,407 $3,075 $8,482 1-1/2 Inch 3.33 $6,500 $3,696 $10,196 2Inch 5.33 $10,404 $5,916 $16,320 3Inch 10.00 $19,520 $11,100 $30,620 4Inch 16.67 $32,540 $18,504 $51,044 6Inch 33.33 $65,060 $36,996 $102,056 8Inch 53.33 $104,100 $59,196 $163,296 10 Inch 76.67 $149,660 $85,104 $234,764 Note: Source of Equivalency Factors is American Water Works Association, Manual of Water Supply Practices No. M6, "Water Meters - Selection, Installation, Testing, and Maintenance" C Am soffice \wi nword \data \exh i b6. doc CITY OF FORT WORTH Exhibit #7 SCHEDULE '1 WATER AND WASTEWATER EMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE METER EQUIVALENCY WATER WASTEWATER SIZE FACTOR IlviPACT FEE IMPACT FEE 3/4" 1.00 5799.00 S1017..00 1" 1 -67 51334.33 S1698.39 1 1/2" 333 52660.67 S3386.61 2" 5.33 $4258.67 $5420.61 3 " 10.00 57990.00 $10,170.00 4" 16.67 S 13,3 19.33 S16,953-39 6 " 33.33 526,630.67 533,896.61 8 " 53.33 542,610.67 554,236.61 10" 76.67 561,259.33 $77,973.39 CITY OF FORT WORTH Exhibit #8 SCHEDULE 2 WATER AND WASTEWATER MPACT FEE COLLECTION SCHEDULE NfETER EQUIVALENCY WATER WASTEWATER SIZE FACTOR IMPACT FEE* IMPACT FEE** 3/4" 1.00 S356.00 S580.20 1" 1.67 5594.52 5968.93 1 1I2" 3.33 S1185.48 S 1932.07 2" 5.33 S1897.48 53092.47 3" 10.00 53560.00 55802.00 4 " 16.67 S5934.52 S9671.93 6" 33.33 S11,865.48 S19,338.07 8" 53 S18,985.48 S30,942.07 10" 76.67 527,294.52 S44,483.93 * Water is 44.6% of the total maximum assessable amount- Wastewater is 57.1 % of the total maximum assessable amount. Exhibit #9 EXISTING vs. PROPOSED IMPACT FEES for 3/4" Metered Connection City of Fort Worth NRH Maximum (FW) Maximum Total Maximum Impact Fee Impact Fee " Impact Fee Water: Existing $ 725.00 $ 839.00 $1,564 Proposed $1,952.00 $ 799.00 $2,751 Wastewater: Existing $ 225.00 $1,285.00 $1,510 Proposed $1,110.00 $1,017.00 $2,127 As adopted by North Richland Hills by ordinance. d: \wp \\data\schedule.dp Exhibit #10 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Recommended Impact Fee Collection Rate (NRH Current Fee Collected) X 1.5 + FW Current Fee Collected = CIAC Proposed Fee Collected NRH Fee FW Fee Total Fee Collected Collected Collected Water: Current $362.00 S234.96` $596.96 CIAC Proposed $543.00 $234.96' $777.96 Wastewater: Current 5112.00 $580.20 5692.20 CIAC Proposed $168.00 S580.20 $748.20 'The current FW charge for water is a percentage of their normal impact fee. The percentage is annually adjusted based on the amount of FW water supplied to the amount of FW and Trinity River Authority water used by NRH. WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY COMPARISON OF IMPACT FEES AMONG VARIOUS CITIES IN THE AREA CITY IMPACT FEE RATE FORT WORTH PASS THRU COMBINED TOTAL RATES CITY WATER SEWER TOTAL WATER SEWER TOTAL WATER SEWER TOTAL NRH - Maximum $1,952.00 $1,110.00 $3,062.00 $234.96 $580.20 $815.16 $2,186.96 $1,690.20 $3,877.16 N'RH - Current 362.00 112.00 47400 234.96 580.20 815.16 596.96 692.20 1,289.16 CIAC Proposal 543.00 168.00 702.00 234.96 580.20 815.16 777.96 748.20 1,526.16 Staff Proposal 488.00 277.50 765.50 234.96 580.20 815.16 722.96 857.70 1.580.66 Hurst 618.00 235.00 853.00 356.00 580.20 936.00 974.00 815.00 1,789.00 Keller 750.00 750.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 750.00 750.00 1,500.00 Colleyville 816.00 51.00 867.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 816.00 51.00 867.00 Euless 592.00 746.00 1,338.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 592.00 746.00 1,338.00 Haltom City 143.69 118.57 262.26 356.00 580.20 936.00 499.69 698.57 1,198.26 Grapevine 764.00 140.00 904.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 764.00 140.00 904.00 Southlake - Current 1,250.00 1,000.00 2,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,250.00 1,000.00 2,250.00 Southlake - Proposed 1,450.00 900.00 2,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,450.00 900.00 2,350.00 M Arlington 383.00 315.00 698.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 383.00 315.00 698.00 Mansfield 680.00 350.00 1,030.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 680.00 350.00 1,030.00 Grand Prairie 1 212.00 1 145.00 1 357.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 212.00 1 145.00 357.00 c: \m soff ice \exce 1 \work \ex h i b 11.x1 s IMPACT FEE SUMMARY TABLE for 3/4" Metered Connection NRH Impact Fees F.W. Impact Fees Combined Impact Fees % of % of Description Water Max Wastewater Max. Water Wastewater Water Wastewater Total Current Maximum $725.00 100% $225.00 100% $839.00 $1,285.00 $1,564.00 $1,510.00 $3,074.00 Current Collected $362.00 50% $112.00 50% $234.96 $580.20 $596.96 $692.20 $1,289.16 Proposed Maximum $1,952.00 100% $1,110.00 100% $799.00 $1,017.00 $2,751.00 $2,127.00 $4,878.00 CIAC Proposal for Collected $543.00 27.82% $168.00 15.14% $234.96 $580.20 $777.96 $748.20 $1,526.16 Staff Proposal for Collected $488.00 25% $277.50 25% $234.96 $580.20 $722.96 $857.70 $1,580.66 m x vo cAmsoffice \excel \work \exh i bit 11.x1s N EXHIBIT A LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS WATER FACILITIES 1996 -2016 May 28, 1996 EXHIBIT A LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS WATER FACILITIES 1996 -2016 May 28 1996 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS WATER FACILITIES 1996 -2016 Prepared for: CITY OF FORT WORTH WATER DEPARTMENT Prepared by: CARTER AND BURGESS, INC. Consultants in Engineering, Architecture, Planning and the Environment 3880 Hulen Street Fort Worth, Texas 76107 (817) 735 -6000 May 28, 1996 -0 * ; •4s�y S- z g .. . : .............. is . TOMMY . O. OBRIEN� I. �,�:• 9 47966 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... ............................... 1 ENABLINGLEGISLATION ........................................................................ ............................... 1 WATERSERVICE AREA ........................................................................... ............................... 1 SERVICE AREA POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT ........................ ............................... 4 FIGURES: 1 - WATER SERVICE AREA ......................................................................... ..............................3 TABLES: 1 - TOTAL EXISTING AND PROJECTED POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FOR FORT WORTH AND WHOLESALE WATER CUSTOMERS ........... ............................... 5 2 - WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVED BY CITYOF FORT WORTH ......................................................................... ............................... 7 3 - SUMMARY OF POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVED BY THE CITY OF FORT WORTH WATER SYSTEM ........................................................ ............................... 8 APPENDIX: BACKGROUND, METHODOLOGY, AND RESOURCES USED TO PRE -PARE DEMOGRAPHICESTIMATES .................................................................... .............................10 WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY ....................................................... .............................12 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS WATER FACILITIES 1996 -2016 INTRODUCTION This document contains the Land Use Assumptions for the City of Fort Worth water facilities. Information contained in this document will be used in the formulation of the Water Capital Improvements Plan, and ultimately for impact fees. The purpose of this document is to update the previous Land Use Assumptions for water facilities and the previous summaries of assumptions about population growth and employment, as adopted in the 1993 Ordinance for the 1993 to 2013 time period. Population and employment projections will be addressed in this document for a 20- year period, from 1996 to 2016. ENABLING LEGISLATION Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395 authorizes a political subdivision to impose impact fees on land within its corporate boundaries and extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). A political subdivision may also contract to provide capital improvements to areas outside its city limits and ETJ, and may charge an impact fee under the contract. In addition, the Local Government Code states that a political subdivision imposing an impact fee shall update the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan every three years. The initial 3 -year period begins on the day the Capital Improvements Plan is adopted. The City of Fort Worth adopted Ordinance No. 11328 on June 1, 1993, entitled "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 — Water and Sewers — Establishing Water and Wastewater Impact Fees." Again, the purpose of this document is to update the land use assumptions and forecasts of population and employment prepared for the 1993 Ordinance. WATER SERVICE AREA The City of Fort Worth Water Department (Water Department) provides service to retail and wholesale customers in what is known in this "Land Use Assumptions - Water Facilities - 1996 - 2016" document as the Water Service Area. The "Water Service Area" generally is defined in Chapters 395 and 35 of the referenced codes as the Water Benefit Area plus all the wholesale water customers. The Water Benefit Area includes the area within the City of Fort Worth city limits and its ETJ to which water service is either provided or could be provided on a retail basis. 1 The Water Service Area boundaries for the years 2006 and 2016 are shown on Figure 1. The Water Service Area boundaries are strategic planning boundaries that were generally defined by the City of Fort Worth 1989 Water Master Plan Study and have been refined and adjusted by the Water Department to meet predicted future demands. By City Charter, the City of Fort Worth Water Department provides retail water service to approximately 139,836 retail water accounts. Retail accounts include all residences and businesses located within the City's current corporate limits. In addition, the City of Fort Worth Water Department is contracted to provide wholesale potable water service to twenty -six (26) wholesale water customers. Generally, the wholesale water customers are suburban communities lying either within or adjacent to the City of Fort Worth corporate limits. The wholesale water customers that are served include all or parts of: Benbrook Bethesda Water Supply Corp. Burleson Crowley D/FW International Airport Dalworthington Gardens Edgecliff Village Everman Forest Hill Haltom City Haslet Hurst Keller Kennedale Lake Worth North Richland Hills Richland Hills Saginaw Sansom Park Southlake Tarrant County MUD #1 Trinity River Authority (TRA) Trophy Club MUD #1 Westover Hills Westworth Village White Settlement Also serves Watagua. Existing and projected population and employment have been determined for the City of Fort Worth and each of the wholesale customers. Population and employment projections were based on the city limits of the City of Fort Worth and the wholesale customers. Table 1 includes the total existing and projected population and employment data for the City of Fort Worth and these wholesale customers for the years 1996, 2006, and 2016. Table 2 provides the actual percentage and number of persons served in 1996, and the projected percentage and number of persons to be served by the City of Fort Worth for the years 2006 and 2016. The methods used to determine the information set forth in Tables 1 and 2 are expanded on in the following sections. 2 r AM IL Ar w� at \��••,-` ' _ ►��_��. N■W�ai 0111IP",., ; IN t � I SERVICE AREA POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT Total Population and Employment Within the Water Service Area It is necessary to analyze the Water Service Area population and employment data in order to more fully understand the City's current and potential future water service requirements. This portion of the document presents land use assumptions, which consist of populations and employment projections, for the Water Service Area for the years 1996, 2006, and 2016. These assumptions, which are considered as a fair and equal basis for distribution of capital costs, will be the basis for development of a capital improvements plan and the resulting impact fee for water facilities within the City of Fort Worth. For this "Land Use Assumptions - Water Facilities - 1996 to 2016" document, population and employment forecasts developed for the City of Fort Worth Water Service Area are based largely on survey information provided by the Fort Worth Water Department wholesale customers, the City of Fort Worth, and interpolated data from the North Central Texas Council of Governments ( NCTCOG). (A copy of the survey is included at the end of the Appendix.) Population and employment projections provided by wholesale customers were compared to information provided by the NCTCOG to assure consistency in projection outcomes. In the event that sufficient projection information was not provided, population and employment forecasts were determined by interpolation of NCTCOG data. The summary of total wholesale customer forecasted population and employment for Fort Worth and wholesale customers for the years 1996, 2006, and 2016 is shown on Table 1. Methodology used to prepare the demographics for the Fort Worth Water/ Wastewater Service Area is described more fully in the "Appendix " attached. Percent of Total Population and Employment Served Within the Water Service Area Forecasting total population is important in establishing total future water service requirements by a political subdivision. In addition, it is necessary to calculate the total population and employment to be served by Fort Worth to more accurately reflect the future needs of wholesale customers and demands on the Fort Worth water system. Table 2 provides the number of persons served in 1996, and to be served for the years 2006 and 2016. Table 2 also shows the percent of the total population served or to be served by the City of Fort Worth. The percentage of the total population and employment of each wholesale customer to be served by the City of Fort Worth was calculated by dividing the total water purchased from the City of Fort Worth by the total water used by the wholesale customer. In addition, an estimated percentage of the total population and employment to be served by the City of Fort Worth in 2006 and 2016 was provided in the wholesale customers' survey information. 4 TABLE 1 TOTAL EXISTING AND PROJECTED POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FOR FORT WORTH AND WHOLESALE WATER CUSTOMERS POPULATION EMPLOYMENT Wholesale Customer 1996 2006 2016 1996 2006 2016 BENBROOK 20,197 29 35 112 3,510 5,826 7 BETHESDA 1 19,260 25 31 260 - - - BURLESON 17 21 500 24 8,624 10,329 11 CROWLEY 7,000 9,200 12,000 1,660 1,760 1,860 D /FW AIRPORT 0 0 0 40,900 51,930 62 DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS 2 4 033 5,000 995 1 1 EDGECLIFF VILLAGE 2 2,931 3,102 410 660 935 EVERMAN 5,800 6,500 7 000 600 650 700 FOREST HILL 14 14 850 16,000 400 415 520 FORT WORTH 471 504 006 535,280 370,155 449,580 533,250* HALTOM CITY 36,251' 39,280 41 11 5 13,200 15,730 HASLET 860 2,190 4 100 1,240 3,954 HURST 35,980* 36,244 36 770 17,485* 20,710 24,130 KELLER 18,813* 27,340 36,210 2 025 3,900' 6,300 KENNEDALE 5,100 9,000 12,000 1 1,550 1 LAKE WORTH 5,072 5,143 5,25q* 1 1 600 1 N. RICHLAND HILLS 51,714* 65,669 77,220* 11,510 13,860 16,840 RICHLAND HILLS 8,187* 9,446 10,100* 5,305 5,980 6,760 SAGINAW 9,300 14 17 3,300 4 300 5,300 SANSOM PARK 3,950 3,950 3,950 650 650 650 SOUTHLAKE 14,430 22,944' 31 5,295 8,370 13,0S0 T.C. MUD #1 5,000 6,500 8,450 50 150 300 TRA GRAND PRAIRIE 2 5,435 5,435 5,435 2,717 2,717 2,717 TROPHY CLUB 5,000 7 11,500 3 500 7 500 11 WATAUGA 21 275 23 114 24 1 1 360 1 WESTOVER HILLS 672 690 705 19 19 19 WESTWORTH VILLAGE 2,350 3,500 4,000 402 622 776 WHITE SETTLEMENT 15,500 15,800 16,100 3,700 4,100 4,600 805,160 915,178 1,017,887 498,422 614,548 737,892 * Forecast Assistance by Consultant Note: Population and employment projections based on city limits of Fort Worth and Wholesale Customers. 1. Population based on number of meters at 3.2 persons per meter. Employment is included in population forecast. 2. Population and employment based on factor of historical average day water provided by Fort Worth divided by historical total water consumed times total population /employment for 1996. Water provided by Fort Worth to remain constant throughout planning period. 5 An example of the calculation and wholesale customer survey data used is as follows: A. Water Supplied by City of Fort Worth to the City of Crowley 674,496 a pd (from wholesale customer survey) B. Total Water Usage of the City of Crowley 781.144 a pd (from wholesale customer survey) C. Percent of People Served by Fort Worth's Water in the City of Crowley 86 % (A /B =C) (on table 2) Table 3 summarizes the total and projected population and employment served by the Fort Worth Water Department in 1996, 2006, and 2016. The 1996 population served by the City of Fort Worth water system is estimated to be 717,729. It is anticipated that by the year 2006 the Fort Worth water system will be serving 809,240 people and by the year 2016 it will increase to serve 899,905 people. The current (1996) employment population served by Fort Worth is estimated to be 453,237. Employment population in 2006 is forecasted to be 552,704 and increase to 664,888 by the year 2016. 6 TABLE 2 WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH Wholesale Customer % SERVED % SERVED POPULATION EMPLOYMENT 1996 2006 2016 1996 2006 2016 1996 2006 2016 BENBROOK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BETHESDA 8 40 50 1,541 10 15,630 - - - BURLESON 98 100 100 17,631 2-1,5--00- 24 690 8,452 10,329 11,775 CROWLEY 86 100 100 6,020 9,200 12,000 1,428 1,760 1 DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS 63 551 57 1,334 2 2 850 627 864 1 D /FW AIRPORT 40 33 33 0 0 0 16,360 17,137 20 EDGECLIFF VILLAGE 100 100 100 2,757 2,931 3,102 410 660 935 EVERMAN 29 29 29 1,682 1,885 2 174 189 203 FOREST HILL 100 100 100 14,000 14,850 16,000 400 415 520 HALTOM CITY 100 100 100 36,251 39,280 41,997 11,075 13,200 15,730 HASLET 7 25 45 60 548 2,240 7 310 1 HURST 90 861 86 32,382 31,170 31,622 15,737 17 20,752 KELLER 98 98 98 18,437 26,793 35,485 1 985 3,822 6,174 KENNEDALE 0 0 10 0 0 1,200 0 0 170 LAKE WORTH 56 56 80 2,840 2 4 826 896 1 N. RICHLAND HILLS 76 75 75 39,303 49,252 57,915 8,748 10,395 12 RICHLAND HILLS 66 70 70 5,403 6 612 7 33,501 4 186 4,732 SAGINAW 93 1001 100 8,649 14,021 17 3 069 4 5,300 SANSOM PARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTHLAKE 100 100 100 14,430 22,944 31,810 5,295 8,370 13 050 T.C. MUD #1 95 90 90 4,750 5,850 7,605 48 135 270 TRA GRAND PRAIRIE * 100 100 100 5,435 5 435 5 435 2 2,717 2,717 TROPHY CLUB 61 70 80 3,050 5,250 9,200 20 35 5 250 8-,8-00 WATAUGA 76 751 75 16,169 17 18,720 958 1 1,140 WESTOVER HILLS 100 100 100 672 690 705 19 19 19 WESTWORTH VILLAGE 100 100 100 2,350 3,500 4,000 402 622 776 WHITE SETTLEMENT 42 35 401 6,510 5,530 6,440 1 1 435 1,840 TOTALS 1 241,656 299,778 358,953 85,927 105,841 134,355 * % Served = % of population and employment to which the City of Fort Worth provides water service. Note: Population and employment projections based on city limits of Fort Worth and Wholesale Customers. 7 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH WATER SYSTEM POPULATION EMPLOYMENT 1996 2006 2016 1996 2006 2016 FORT WORTH 471 504,006 535,280 370,155 449,580 533,250 See Table 1 WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS 241 299,778 358,953 85,927 105,841 134 (See Table 2) TOTAL POPULATION SERVED 712,805 803,784 894,233 1 456,082 555,421 667,605 Note: Population and employment projections based on city limits of Fort Worth and Wholesale Customers. 8 APPENDIX BACKGROUND, METHODOLOGY, AND RESOURCES USED TO PREPARE DEMOGRAPHIC ESTIMATES 9 APPENDIX BACKGROUND, METHODOLOGY, AND RESOURCES USED TO PREPARE DEMOGRAPHIC ESTIMATES BACKGROUND Population and employment forecasts developed for the City of Fort Worth Water Service Area are based on information provided by the records of the City of Fort Worth Water Department wholesale customers, the City of Fort Worth, and data from the North Central Texas Council of Governments ( NCTCOG). Population and employment forecasts are based on the city limits of Fort Worth and the wholesale customers. METHODOLOGY It is necessary to analyze the Water Service Area population and employment data to understand the City of Fort Worth's current (1996) and future water service requirements. Letter surveys were sent to each wholesale customer to provide information on current land use, population, and employment. In addition, each wholesale customer was requested to provide forecasts of community population and employment for the years 2006 and 2016. (A copy of the survey is enclosed at the end of this Appendix.) The population and employment projections provided by the wholesale customers were compared with data prepared by the NCTCOG and the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). In the event that there was a substantial discrepancy between wholesale customer and NCTCOG or TWDB forecasts, the customer was contacted to discuss the discrepancy and to establish appropriate figures. In summary, wholesale customer projections were compared to: 1) NCTCOG projections for the years 2010 and 2020; 2) Interpolated NCTCOG projections for 2006 and 2016; and 3) TWDB projections for 1990 to 2020 (in 5 -year increments). Some of the wholesale customers and the City of Fort Worth were unable to provide population and /or employment forecasts for the target forecast years of 2006 and 2016. Population forecasts for those wholesale customer cities were determined by interpolating between the 1996 population data provided by the wholesale customers and NCTCOG forecasts for the years 2010 and 2020. The following explains this process. A population figure for 2006 was obtained by interpolating between the wholesale customer's 1996 population and the NCTCOG 2010 population forecast to determine a growth- per -year growth constant. The growth constant was then used to 10 determine the increase in population from 1996 to 2006 and project the year 2006 population. A population figure for 2016 was obtained by determining a growth constant between NCTCOG 2010 and 2020 population forecasts. This growth constant was used to determine the increase in population from 2006 to 2016 and project the year 2016 population. In instances where a 2020 forecasted population was not available, a growth constant was developed for the years between 1996 and 2010 to then forecast a population for 2016. Some of the wholesale customers were unable to provide a 1996 population. Data available from NCTCOG were used to determine a 1996 population for these wholesale customers. Employment forecasts for the years 2006 and 2016 were determined in the same manner as population forecasts. However, many of the wholesale customers did not have a 1996 employment estimate. In these cases, employment figures from the 1990 Census and NCTCOG 2010 employment forecast were used to determine a growth constant. This growth constant was used to determine a 1996 employment estimate. RESOURCES 1990 Census: Population and Housing Characteristics. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Wastewater Engineering: McGraw -Hill, Inc., 1972 North Central Texas Council of Governments. Dallas/Fort Worth Economic Outlook: Recent Trends and Long -Range Forecasts to the Year 2010: Regional Data Center, February 1989. North Central Texas Council of Governments. North Central Texas 1994 Demographic Forecasts: Research and Information Services, Fall 1994. North Central Texas Council of Governments. North Central Texas 1994 Demographic Forecasts: 2020 Extension: Research and Information Services, Winter 1996. North Central Texas Council of Governments. 1995 Current Population Estimates: Research Information Services, April 1995. Texas Water Development Board. Water for Texas - Today and Tomorrow: A Consensus - Based Update to the Texas Water Plan: January 1996. 11 WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY 12 January 10, 1996 Reference: Fort Worth Water Department Impact Fee Ordinance Update Dear : In accordance with Section 395.052 of the *Chapter 395 Financing Capital Improvements Required by new Developments in Municipalities; Counties and Certain Other Local Governments' of Texas State Statutes and applicable sections of the Fort Worth Water and Wastewater Contract with you, we are initiating the updating of the present Land Use Assumptions and Impact Fee Ordinance which was adopted on June 6, 1990 and revised on June 6, 1993. The City of Fort Worth Water Department will be using the NCTCOG population forecasts for its 16 County Region as a basis in the calculation of number of service units in the Fort Worth Water/Wastewater benefit area. We are soliciting our wholesale customers help in our preliminary analysis of water usage and wastewater discharge rates to compare to the NCTCOG population forecasts. In this regard, we have a series of questions related to a.) your present total water sales and b.) any significant change in number of water customers since 1993 that would have an effect upon either your municipalities future water usage or wastewater discharge to the City of Fort Worth system. Your help in this request will greatly benefit our updating activities, plus your help will provide a more accurate assessment of the present and future land use assumptions regarding your City. Our questions are as follows: Ia. Water Resources Total water purchased from the City of Fort Worth mg 1993 mg 1994 mg 1995 1 b. Total water usage by your City in mg 1993 mg 1994 mg 1995 January 10, 1996 Page 2 2. Water Resources (Future). Estimated percentage of total water usage by your City and which is purchased. % 2006 % 2016 3a. Number of residential water meters at present (no flag meters or fire line meters). 3/4' 4' 1' 6' 1 1/2' 8' 2' 10' 3 ' 3b. Number of non - residential water meters at present (no flag meters or fire line meters). 3/4' 4' 1' 6' 1 1/2' 8' 2' 10' 3 ' 4a. Historical annual water used (mg) by residential customers in the last six years. 1990 1993 1991 1994 1992 1995 4b. Historical annual water used (mg) by non - residential customers in the last six years. 1990 1993 1991 1994 1992 1995 5a. Monthly total water use by residential for the last 2 years. 1994 1995 Jan Jul Jan Jul Feb Aug Feb Aug Mar Sep Mar Sep Apr Oct Apr Oct May Nov May Nov Jun Dec Jun Dec January 10, 1996 Page 3 5b. Monthly total water use by non - residential for the last 2 years. 1994 1995 Jan Jul Jan Jul Feb Aug Feb Aug Mar Sep Mar Sep Apr Oct Apr Oct May Nov May Nov Jun Dec Jun Dec 6. Current number of wastewater residential customers. Residential Non - Residential 7. Historical annual wastewater discharge into Fort Worth system for the last 5 years. Residential (gal) Non - Residential (gal) 1991 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 1994 1994 1995 1995 B. Do you have a City Comprehensive Land Use Plan? Yes No If you answer is Yes, would you make a copy available to the City of Fort Worth Water Department? 9. Has your City had a significant (5% or more) change in population since the following dates? 1990 yes no 1993 yes no If you answered yes to either of the above please indicate the percentage of change. 10. Has there been a major addition, or deletion, of a high volume water user (i.e., a new industry, the closing of a major retail land use) or the addition of a high volume mutt amily land use to your City since the following dates? (High volume user meaning that the subject water use is noticeable in the City's monthly water sales records.) 1990 yes no 1993 yes no If your answer is yes, is the land use residential or non - residential ? January 10, 1996 Page 4 11. Best estimate of acres of use in your City for the following is: Low density (0-4 units /ac) residential acres Medium density (5-8 units /ac) residential acres High density (9 units +) residential acres Commercial acres Industrial - (warehousing) acres (heavy) acres Vacant Land acres 12. Has there been a change of number acres of the above listed land use since 1993? No Yes, more acres of Medium density residential High density residential Commercial Heavy Industrial 13. Any of the land uses in question 12 major wastewater customers? Yes _ No 14. Other Data. Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your community? Yes _ No if yes, please include a copy of your ordinance when mailing this questionnaire back to the City of Fort Worth Water Department. 15. What is your forecast of community population? Residential Employment 1995 2006 2016 Due to the nature of our expedited schedule your response to the questions is needed by February 12, 1996. Carter & Burgess, Inc. with CH Hill, is under contract for the preparation of the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee Ordinance preparation. The schedule for the preparation of the Ordinance will be provided to each wholesale customer during the next few weeks. Each wholesale customer will be continually advised as to the Ordinance updating progress through monthly newsletters to you, Water and Wastewater System Advisory Committee and Customer Impact Fee Committee (CIFC) meetings. January 10, 1996 Page 5 Should you have any questions related to the information we are requesting, don't hesitate to call Mr. Tommy O'Brien, P.E. of Carter & Burgess, Inc., at (817) 735 -7131. Again, thank you for your help in the updating of the Land Use Assumptions in that we can be more accurate in our impact fee calculations. Sincerely, Lee C. Bradley, Jr., P.E. Water Director TOO /LB /rb 953100/11 cc: Correspondence Mail Responses to: Mr. S. Frank Crumb, P.E. City of Fort Worth Water Department P. 0. Box 870 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth, Texas 76101 -0870 EXHIBIT B LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS WASTEWATER FACILITIES 1996 -2016 May 28, 1996 EXHIBIT B LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS WASTEWATER FACILITIES 1996 -2016 May 28, 1996 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS WASTEWATER FACILITIES 1996 -2016 Prepared for: CITY OF FORT WORTH WATER DEPARTMENT Prepared by: CARTER AND BURGESS, INC. Consultants in Engineering, Architecture, Planning and the Environment 3880 Hulen Street Fort Worth, Texas 76107 (817) 735 -6000 May 28, 1996 Joe p f ....... TOPMA 0 O'BRIEN 47966 A� •S •.... « «• �ib1' TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... ............................... 1 ENABLINGLEGISLATION ........................................................................ ............................... 1 EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM ..................................................... ............................... 2 WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA ......................................................... ............................... 2 SERVICE AREA POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT ............................ ..............................3 FIGURES: 1 - WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA .......................................................... ..............................4 TABLES: 1- TOTAL EXISTING AND PROJECTED POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FOR FORT WORTH AND WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS ........................... ............................... 6 2 - WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVED BY VILLAGE CREEK WWTP ..................................................................... ............................... 7 3 - SUMMARY OF POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVED BY VILLAGE CREEK WWTP....................................................................................................... ............................... 8 APPENDIX: BACKGROUND, METHODOLOGY, AND RESOURCES USED TO PREPARE DEMOGRAPHIC ESTIMATES ................................................................... .............................10 WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY ...................................................... .............................13 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS WASTEWATER FACILITIES 1996 -2016 INTRODUCTION This document contains the Land Use Assumptions for the City of Fort Worth wastewater facilities. Information contained in this document will be used in the formulation of the Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan, and ultimately for impact fees. The purpose of this document is to update the previous Land Use Assumptions for wastewater facilities and the summaries of assumptions about population growth and employment, as adopted in the 1993 Ordinance for the 1996 to 2016 time period. Population and employment projections will be addressed in this document for a 20- year period, from 1996 to 2016. ENABLING LEGISLATION Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395 authorizes a political subdivision to impose impact fees on land within its corporate boundaries and extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). A political subdivision may also contract to provide capital improvements to areas outside its city limits and ETJ, and may charge an impact fee under the contract. In addition, the Local Government Code states that a political subdivision imposing an impact fee shall update the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan every three years. The initial 3 -year period begins on the day the Capital Improvements Plan is adopted. The City of Fort Worth adopted Ordinance No. 11328 on June 1, 1993, entitled "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 — Water and Sewers — Establishing Water and Wastewater Impact Fees." Again, the purpose of this document is to update the land use assumptions and forecasts of population and employment prepared for the 1993 Ordinance. i EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM The City of Fort Worth's existing wastewater system consists of a collection system network and a single treatment facility, the Village Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). In addition, the Trinity River Authority of Texas (TRA) provides treatment facilities serving the far eastern and northern edge of Fort Worth. As indicated in Figure 1, the small area at the far eastern edge of the City of Fort Worth (Centreport Area, Post Oak Village, and Mosier Valley) is within the TRA wastewater service area. Also, portions of the area in northern Fort Worth, which cannot be served by gravity sewers to the Village Creek WWTP, will be served under contract by the TRA. The northern area in question drains into two different TRA sewersheds: Big Bear Creek and Denton Creek. A portion of the area in the Big Bear Creek sewershed will be served by TRA's Big Bear Creek Interceptor. Future Fort Worth sewers will connect to the new TRA interceptor near the town of Keller. Treatment will be provided at TRA's existing Central Regional WWTP. The area of Fort Worth north of the Big Bear Creek system is in TRA's Denton Creek Regional Wastewater System service area. The Fort Worth sewers connect to the TRA Henrietta Creek and Cade Branch Interceptors and to a trunk extending to Alliance Airport. Treatment is provided at the Denton Creek Regional WWTP. WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA The City of Fort Worth Water Department (Water Department) provides service to retail and wholesale customers in what is known in this "Land Use Assumptions - Wastewater Facilities - 1996- 2016" document as the Wastewater Service Area. The "Wastewater Service Area" is generally defined in Chapters 395 and 35 of the referenced codes as the Wastewater Benefit Area plus all the wholesale wastewater customers. The Wastewater Benefit Area includes the area within the City of Fort Worth city limits and its ETJ to which wastewater service is either provided or could be provided on a retail basis. The Wastewater Service Area boundaries for the years 2006 and 2016 are shown on Figure 1. The Wastewater Service Area boundaries are strategic planning boundaries that were generally defined by the 1989 Water Master Plan Study and have been refined and adjusted by the City of Fort Worth to meet predicted future demands. Included within the Wastewater Service Area are the areas served by the TRA, and twenty -three (23) wholesale customers, all or parts of which are served by the Fort Worth Wastewater System. Pursuant to contracts, the City of Fort Worth provides each 2 wholesale customer with wastewater services at the Fort Worth city limits. Note that the service provided to the City of Arlington will, per the contract, expire prior to 2006. The current wholesale customers are: Arlington * Benbrook Blue Mound Burleson Crowley Edgecliff Village Everman Forest Hill Haltom City Hurst * * ** Kennedale Lake Worth North Richland Hills ** Pantego Richland Hills River Oaks Saginaw Sansom Park Tarrant County MUD #1 TRA - Walker- Calloway Westworth Village White Settlement Westover Hills Also serves Dalworthington Gardens. ** Also serves Watauga. * ** Three party contract serves a portion of North Richland Hills and Hurst. * * ** Also serves portion of Bedford. Existing and projected population and employment have been determined for each of the wholesale customers. Population and employment projections were based on the city limits of the City of Fort Worth and the wholesale customers. Table 1 includes the total existing and projected population and employment data for the City of Fort Worth and the noted wholesale customers for the years 1996, 2006, and 2016. Table 2 provides existing and projected population and employment to be served by the Village Creek WWTP. The methods used to determine the information set forth in Tables 1 and 2 are expanded on in the following sections. SERVICE AREA POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT Total Population and Employment Within the Wastewater Service Area It is necessary to analyze the Wastewater Service Area population and employment data in order to more fully understand the City's current and potential future wastewater service requirements. This portion of the document presents land use assumptions, which consists of populations and employment projections, for the Wastewater Service Area for the years 1996, 2006, and 2016. These assumptions, which are considered as a fair and equal basis for distribution of capital costs, will be the basis for development of a capital improvements plan and the resulting impact fee for wastewater facilities within the City of Fort Worth. For this "Land Use Assumptions - Wastewater Facilities - 1996 to 2016" document, population and employment forecasts developed for the City of Fort Worth Wastewater 3 i - ■ roi�� VR F A N. ��. . al1MAR. FEW Fix Alow i • • ' • Fort Worth, Texas I I � Service Area are based largely on survey information provided by the Fort Worth Water Department wholesale customers, the City of Fort Worth, and interpolated data from the North Central Texas Council of Governments ( NCTCOG). (A copy of the survey is included at the end of the Appendix.) Population and employment projections provided by wholesale customers were compared to information provided by the NCTCOG to assure consistency in projection outcomes. In the event that sufficient projection information was not provided, population and employment forecasts were determined by interpolation of NCTCOG data. The summary of total wholesale customer forecasted population and employment for Fort Worth and wholesale customers for the years 1996, 2006, and 2016 is shown on Table 1. Methodology used to prepare the demographics for the Fort Worth Water/ Wastewater Service Area is described more fully in the "Appendix " attached. Several of the wholesale customer cities, along with the City of Fort Worth, have populations that are served by TRA. Only areas that are served by the Village Creek WWTP are included in the estimates of projected population shown in Table 2 for wholesale customer cities, and in Table 3 for the City of Fort Worth. Furthermore, a portion of the west side of the City of Arlington falls in the service area of the Village Creek WWTP. This portion of the City of Arlington has, by contract with the City of Fort Worth, been served by the Village Creek WWTP. The existing contract between the two cities expires in February 2001. Fort Worth notified Arlington in 1989 of its intent to terminate service at the conclusion of the contract. At this time it is not known how service to that area of Arlington will be provided. Therefore, Table 2 shows a service area population for the City of Arlington which is the projected population that will be served by the Village Creek WWTP in 2001, prior to the time of expiration of the existing contract. This is done to ensure that adequate wastewater capital facilities are in place to serve that population until the year 2001. Population and Employment Served by Village Creek WWTP Table 3 summarizes the total and projected population and employment served by the Fort Worth Water Department in 1996, 2006, and 2016. The current (1996) population in the Village Creek WWTP service area is estimated to be 809,551. It is estimated that by the year 2006, the Village Creek WWTP will serve a population of 787,253, and by the year 2016 the population will be an estimated 849,251. The current (1996) employment in the Village Creek WWTP service area is estimated to be 431,060. It is estimated that by the year 2006, the Village Creek WWTP will serve an employment number of 494,060 and by the year 2016 the employment numbers served will be an estimated 578,659. It is important to note that approximately 10,000 people are served by private or individual disposal systems, but are in the City of Fort Worth Wastewater Service Area. These people are not included in the Village Creek WWTP populations. Those persons on private systems are generally located in newly annexed areas and have not yet had wastewater service extended to the area, such as the Oak Grove area. 5 TABLE 1 TOTAL EXISTING AND PROJECTED POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FOR FORT WORTH AND WHOLESALE WASTEWATER CUSTOMERS POPULATION EMPLOYMENT Wholesale Customer 1996 2006 2016 1996 2006 2016 ARLINGTON 283,514* - - 98,930* - - BENBROOK 20,197 29,132 35,112 3,510 5,826 7,022 BLUE MOUND 2,350 2,400* 2,800* 315* 340* 365* BURLESON 17 21,500 24,690 8,624 10,329 11 775 CROWLEY 7 9 200 12,000 1 1,760* 1 860 DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS 2,117* 4 5,000 995* 1,570* 1,800* EDGECLIFF VILLAGE 2,757 2 31 3,102* 410* 660* 935 EVERMAN 5,800 6,500 7,000 600 650 700 FOREST HILL 14 14,850 16,000 400 415 520 FORT WORTH 471,149 504 535,280* 370,155* 449,580* 533 250 HALTOM CITY 36,251 * 39,280* 41,997 11 13,200* 15,730* HURST 35,980* 36,244* 3-6-,770* 17,485 20,710' 24 KENNEDALE 5,100 9,000 12,000 1,300 1 1,700 LAKE WORTH 5,072 5,143* 5,259 1,475* 1,600* 1,725* N. RICHLAND HILLS 51 65 77,220 11,510' 13,860* 16 PANTEGO 2,350 2 2 1,407 1,831 * 2,252 RICHLAND HILLS 8,187* 9,446* 10000* 5,305 5,980 6 760 RIVER OAKS 7,000 7 000 7 1 1,840* 2,180 SAGINAW 9,300 14 17,000 3,300 4,300 5,300 SANSOM PARK 3,950 3,950 3,950 650* 650* 650 T.C. MUD #1 5,000 6,500 8,450 50 150 300 WATAUGA 21 23,114* 24,960* 1,260 1,360* 1 WESTOVER HILLS 672 690 705 19 19 19 WESTWORTH VILLAGE 2,350 3,500 4,000 402* 622* 776 WHITE SETTLEMENT 15,500 15,800 16,100 3,700 4,100 4,600 TOTALS 1,036,576 836,409 909,145 545,977 542,902 642,709 * Forecast Assistance by Consultant Note: Population and employment projections based on city limits of Fort Worth and Wholesale Customers. 6 TABLE 2 WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVED BY VILLAGE CREEK WWTP RESIDENTIAL EMPLOYMENT Wholesale Customer 1996 2006 2016 1996 2006 2016 ARLINGTON 1 93,560* - - 15,037 - - BENBROOK 20,197 29,132 35,112 3,510 5,826 7 BLUE MOUND 2,350 2,400 2 315 340 365 BURLESON 17 21,500 24 8,624 10,329 11 CROWLEY 7 9,200 12 1,660 1 760 1 DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS 2 1,905 3,629 4 995 1,570 1 800 EDGECLIFF VILLAGE 2,757 2 a31 3,102 410 660 935 EVERMAN 5,800 6,500 7 600 650 700 FOREST HILL 14 14,850 16,000 400 415 520 HALTOM CITY 36,251'* 3399,280* 41,997 11,075 13,200 15,73W HURST 2 3 4 22,388 22 551 22,879 11,657 6,903 8,043 KENNEDALE 5,100 9,000 12 1 1,550 1,700 LAKE WORTH 5,072 5 143 5,259 1,475" 1 1,725 N. RICHLAND HILLS 2 3 33,728 37,915 41,380* 7,674 4 4 PANTEGO 2,350 2,500 2,650 1,407* 1,831 2 RICHLAND HILLS 8,187 9 446 10,100* 5,305 5,980 6,760 RIVER OAKS 7,000 7.000 7 1 1,840 2 SAGINAW 9,300 14 17 3,300 4,300 5,300 SANSOM PARK 3,950 3,950 -3,950 650 650 650 T.C. MUD #1 5,000 6,500 8,450 50 150 300 TRA WALKER - CALLOWAY 22 23 912 25,230'* 9,664* 22,107" 25,182 WATAUGA 21,275 23,114' 24 1 1,360 1 WESTOVER HILLS 672 690 705 19 19 19 WESTWORTH VILLAGE 2,350 3,500 4 402 622 776 WHITE SETTLEMENT 15,500 15,800 16,100 3,700 4,100 4,600 TOTALS 366,118 314,464 348,864 91,929 91,912 106,261 * Forecast Assistance by Consultant Note: Population and employment projections based on city limits of Fort Worth and Wholesale Customers. 1. Population projected to the year 2001. Service contract expires in 2001. 2. Population served by TRA Central WWTP was subtracted from total population (Table 1) to calculate population shown. 3. Population served by Village Creek WWTP through TRA was subtracted from total population (Table 1) and included as "TRA Walker- Calloway" wholesale customer population. 4. Hurst serves a small portion of Bedford. However, Bedford is not a wholesale customer and populations for Bedford are not included in population /employment forecasts for Hurst. 7 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVED BY VILLAGE CREEK WWTP POPULATION EMPLOYMENT 1996 2006 2016 1996 2006 2016 FORT WORTH 452,363* 478,908* 506,739* 343,652* 406,874- 475,690 See Table 1 WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS 366,118 314,464** 348,864** 91,929 1 91 912 ** 106 261 ** (See Table 2) TOTAL POPULATION SERVED 818,481 793,372 855,603 435,581 498,786 1 581,951 * Excludes estimated population served by TRA and private septic tanks. ** Excludes Arlington service. Note: Population and employment projections based on city limits of Fort Worth and Wholesale Customers. 8 APPENDIX BACKGROUND, METHODOLOGY, AND RESOURCES USED TO PREPARE DEMOGRAPHIC ESTIMATES 9 APPENDIX BACKGROUND, METHODOLOGY, AND RESOURCES USED TO PREPARE DEMOGRAPHIC ESTIMATES BACKGROUND Population and employment forecasts developed for the City of Fort Worth Water Service Area are based on information provided by the records of the City of Fort Worth Water Department wholesale customers, the City of Fort Worth, and data from the North Central Texas Council of Governments ( NCTCOG). Population and employment forecasts are based on the city limits of Fort Worth and the wholesale customers. METHODOLOGY It is necessary to analyze the Water Service Area population and employment data to understand the City of Fort Worth's current (1996) and future wastewater service requirements. Letter surveys were sent to each wholesale customer to provide information on current land use, population, and employment. In addition, each wholesale customer was asked to provide forecasts of community population and employment for the years 2006 and 2016. Population and employment projections provided by the wholesale customers were compared with data prepared by the NCTCOG and the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). In the event that there was a substantial discrepancy between wholesale customer and NCTCOG or TWDB forecasts, the customer was contacted to discuss the discrepancy and to establish appropriate figures. In summary, wholesale customer projections were compared to: 1) NCTCOG projections for the years 2010 and 2020; 2) Interpolated NCTCOG projections for 2006 and 2016; and 3) Texas Water Development Board projections for 1990 to 2020 (in 5 -year increments). Some of the wholesale customers and the City of Fort Worth were unable to provide population and /or employment forecast for the target forecast years of 2006 and 2016. Population forecasts for those wholesale customer cities were determined by interpolating between the 1996 population. data provided by the wholesale customers and NCTCOG forecasts for the years 2010 and 2020. The following explains this process. A population figure for 2006 was obtained by interpolating between the wholesale customer's 1996 population and the NCTCOG 2010 population forecast to determine a growth - per -year growth constant. The growth constant was then used to 10 determine the increase in population from 1996 to 2006 and project the year 2006 population. A population figure for 2016 was obtained by determining a growth constant between NCTCOG 2010 and 2020 population forecasts. This growth constant was used to determine the increase in population from 2006 to 2016 and project the year 2016 population. In instances where a 2020 forecasted population was not available, a growth constant was developed for the years between 1996 and 2010 to then forecast a population for 2016. Some of the wholesale customers were unable to provide a 1996 population. Data available from NCTCOG were used to determine a 1996 population for these wholesale customers. Employment forecasts for the years 2006 and 2016 were determined in the same manner as population forecasts. However, many of the wholesale customers did not have a 1996 employment estimate. In these cases, employment figures from the 1990 Census and NCTCOG 2010 employment forecast were used to determine a growth constant. This growth constant was used to determine a 1996 employment estimate. The City of Fort Worth, along with several of the wholesale customer cities have populations that are served by the Trinity River Authority. These populations were factored out of the total population figures using information supplied by the wholesale customer city and NCTCOG. For the City of Fort Worth, the population served by the TRA was obtained by using Census Tract and NCTCOG Forecast District projections. These numbers were applied to the total population figures to obtain the Fort Worth population served by the Village Creek WWTP. Likewise, the population served by the Village Creek WWTP and the City of Arlington was obtained by using Census Tract and NCTCOG Forecast District projections. RESOURCES 1990 Census: Population and Housing Characteristics. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. Wastewater Engineering: McGraw -Hill, Inc., 1972 North Central Texas Council of Governments. Dallas/Fort Worth Economic Outlook: Recent Trends and Long -Range Forecasts to the Year 2010: Regional Data Center, February 1989. North Central Texas Council of Governments. North Central Texas 1994 Demographic Forecasts: Research and Information Services, Fall 1994. 11 North Central Texas Council of Governments. North Central Texas 1994 Demographic Forecasts: 2020 Extension: Research and Information Services, Winter 1996. North Central Texas Council of Governments. 1995 Current Population Estimates: Research Information Services, April 1995. Texas Water Development Board. Water for Texas - Today and Tomorrow: A Consensus - Based Update to the Texas Water Plan: January 1996. 12 WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY 13 January 10, 1996 Reference: Fort Worth Water Department Impact Fee Ordinance Update Dear : In accordance with Section 395.052 of the 'Chapter 395 Financing Capital Improvements Required by new Developments in Municipalities; Counties and Certain Other Local GovemmerW of Texas State Statutes and applicable sections of the Fort Worth Water and Wastewater Contract with you, we are initiating the updating of the present Land Use Assumptions and Impact Fee Ordinance which was adopted on June 6, 1990 and revised on June 6, 1993. The City of Fort Worth Water Department will be using the NCTCOG population forecasts for its 16 County Region as a basis in the calculation of number of service units in the Fort Worth Water/Wastewater benefit area. We are soliciting our wholesale customers help in our preliminary analysis of water usage and wastewater discharge rates to compare to the NCTCOG population forecasts. In this regard, we have a series of questions related to a.) your present total water sales and b.) any significant change in number of water customers since 1993 that would have an effect upon either your municipalities future water usage or wastewater discharge to the City of Fort Worth system. Your help in this request will greatly benefit our updating activities, plus your help will provide a more accurate assessment of the present and future land use assumptions regarding your City. Our questions are as follows: 1 a. Water Resources Total water purchased from the City of Fort Worth mg 1993 mg 1994 mg 1995 1b. Total water usage by your City in mg 1993 mg 1994 mg 1995 January 10, 1996 Page 2 2. Water Resources (Future). Estimated percentage of total water usage by your City and which is purchased. % 2006 % 2016 3a. Number of residential water meters at present (no flag meters or fire line meters). 3/4' 4' 1' 6' 1 1/2' 8' 2' 10' 3 ' 3b. Number of non - residential water meters at present (no flag meters or fire line meters). 3/4' 4' 1' 6' 1 1/2' 8' 2' 10' 3 ' 4a. Historical annual water used (mg) by residential customers in the last sic years. 1990 1993 1991 1994 1992 1995 4b. Historical annual water used (mg) by non - residential customers in the last sic years. 1990 1993 1991 1994 1992 1995 5a. Monthly total water use by residential for the last 2 years. 1994 1995 Jan Jul Jan Jul Feb Aug Feb Aug Mar Sep Mar Sep Apr Oct Apr Oct May Nov May Nov Jun Dec Jun Dec January 10, 1996 Page 3 5b. Monthly total water use by non - residential for the last 2 years. 1994 1995 Jan Jul Jan Jul Feb Aug Feb Aug Mar Sep Mar Sep Apr Oct Apr Oct May Nov May Nov Jun Dec Jun Dec 6. Current number of wastewater residential customers. Residential Non - Residential 7. Historical annual wastewater discharge into Fort Worth system for the last 5 years. Residential (gal) Non - Residential (gal) 1991 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 1994 1994 1995 1995 8. Do you have a City Comprehensive Land Use Plan? Yes No If you answer is Yes, would you make a copy available to the City of Fort Worth Water Department? 9. Has your City had a significant (5% or more) change in population since the following dates? 1990 yes no 1993 yes no If you answered yes to either of the above please indicate the percentage of change. 10. Has there been a major addition, or deletion, of a high volume water user (i.e., a new industry, the closing of a major retail land use) or the addition of a high volume multifamily land use to your City since the following dates? (High volume user meaning that the subject water use is noticeable in the Chys monthly water sales records.) 1990 yes no 1993 yes no If your answer is yes, is the land use residential or non - residential ? January 10, 1996 Page 4 11. Best estimate of acres of use in your City for the following is: Low density (0-4 units /ac) residential acres Medium density (5-8 units /ac) residential acres High density (9 units +) residential acres Commercial acres Industrial - (warehousing) acres (heavy) acres Vacant Land acres 12. Has there been a change of number acres of the above listed land use since 1993? No Yes, more acres of Medium density residential High density residential Commercial Heavy Industrial 13. Any of the land uses in question 12 major wastewater customers? Yes _ No 14. Other Data Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your community? Yes _ No If yes, please include a copy of your ordinance when mailing this questionnaire back to the City of Fort Worth Water Department 15. What is your forecast of community population? Residential Employment 1995 2006 2016 Due to the nature of our expedited schedule your response to the questions is needed by February 12, 1996. Carter ✓3< Burgess, Inc. with CH Hill, is under contract for the preparation of the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee Ordinance preparation. The schedule for the preparation of the Ordinance will be provided to each wholesale customer during the next few weeks. Each wholesale customer will be continually advised as to the Ordinance updating progress through monthly newsletters to you, Water and Wastewater System Advisory Committee and Customer Impact Fee Committee (CIFC) meetings. January 10, 1996 Page 5 Should you have any questions related to the information we are requesting, don't hesitate to call Mr. Tommy O'Brien, P.E. of Carter & Burgess, Inc., at (817) 735.7131. Again, thank you for your help in the updating of the Land Use Assumptions in that we can be more accurate in our impact fee calculations. Sincerely, Lee C. Bradley, Jr., P.E. Water Director TOO /LB /rb 953100/11 cc: Correspondence Mail Responses to: Mr. S. Frank Crumb, P.E. City of Fort Worth Water Department P. 0. Box 870 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth, Texas 76101 -0870 City of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS for Computing WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES July 25, 1996 Prepared for The City of North Richland Hills Public Works Department and the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Prepared by Knowlton- English - Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers (81 7) 283 -6211 July, 1996 KNOWLTON- ENGLISH - FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas July 25, 1996 Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3 -434, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, WA TER AND SEWER IMPACT FEE UPDA TE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS As instructed, we have prepared an update of the current effective "Land Use Assumptions Plan" map. This map is required for development of a "Water and Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Capital Improvements Program" update. A copy of the map is included with this report. This map is based on the current "Future Land Use Map" with updates and projections from the Community Development Staff. The report also presents population distribution and projections based on estimated average population densities associated with each land use category. This report has been prepared to assist the "Capital Improvements Advisory Committee" in advising and assisting the City in adopting the revised Land Use Assumption Plan. Following a Public Hearing and adoption of an Ordinance by the City Council approving the Land Use Assumption Plan update, the Plan will be used to help develop a revised Capital Improvements Plan which shall constitute the basis for development of new Impact Fee Rates. We will be available to assist you in discussing this report with the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee at the meeting scheduled for July 25, 1996. Meanwhile, please call if you hay y questions concerning this assignment. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E, Vice President RWA /ra/Report1.434 xc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, City Manager Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant City Manager Mr. Mike Curtis, P.E., Capital Projects Coordinator Mr. Barry LeBaron, Community Development Director 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 • BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 •817/283 -6211 • METRO 817/267 -3367 FAX 817/354 -4389 Page 2 July 25, 1996 Water and Wastewater System Impact Fee Update Report LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS INTRODUCTION This report includes an update of the currently effective "Land Use Assumptions Map" showing the City of North Richland Hills assumed land use categories along with existing zoning areas for reference. A full color, 1000 -scale fold -out map is included in the jacket at the end of this report. The City Water and Sanitary Sewer System service area is divided into Grid Sheets which correspond to Tarrant County Appraisal District (T.A.D.) map boundaries, as shown on the reduced size map in the Appendix to this report. After sale of the Watauga Water and Sewer system to the City of Watauga, the North Richland Hills service area limits will correspond to the existing N.R.H. City Limits. A tabulation is included in the Appendix which lists the land use areas in acres for each assumed land use category within each Grid Sheet area. These land use areas are divided into existing developed areas, areas projected to be developed within the next 10 years, and the remaining areas to be developed after 10 years. Total areas for each land use category are summarized on page 7 of 7 in the Appendix. These areas are used to determine existing populations and project future assumed population growth. Population projections are used to establish water system demand and sanitary sewer system flows as required for planning a future Capital Improvements Program to meet future population needs. Water and sanitary sewer system improvements required to serve existing developed areas are not subject to Impact Fee Assessments and the cost of these improvements cannot be included in the Impact Fee rates. The City is obligated to provide water mains and sanitary sewer trunk lines to serve the areas subject to development within the next 10 years, as identified on the Land Use Assumptions Map (shown in cross -hatch overlay). The cost of these future improvements are included in the proposed Impact Fee Rates which are assessed to future developers in the City. The cost of water and sewer lines required to provide for ultimate development are also subject to Impact Fee Assessment. Page 3 July 25, 1996 Water and Wastewater System Impact Fee Update Report LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS EXHIBITS LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS MAP This map includes the following information: 1. Land Use Assumption Areas LDR - Low Density Residential R -1, Single Family District, 13,00 S.F. R -2, Single Family District, 9,000 S.F. R -3, Single Family District, 7,500 S.F. R -8, Single Family Zero-Lot -Line, 4,000 S.F. Mobile Home Park Areas MDR - Medium Density Residential R -4 -SD, Separate Ownership Duplex District, 3,5000 S.F. R -5 -D, Duplex District, 7,000 S.F. R -6-T, Townhouse and Garden Home Dist., 3,000 S.F. HDR - High Density Residential R -7 -MF, Multifamily District, 4 Acres COM - Commercial LR, C -1, C -2, OC, 0-1, Local Retail, Commercial, Office IND - Industrial I -1, I -2, Light and Medium Industrial Districts PUB - Public /Quasi - Public Areas U - School, Church and Institutional Districts Page 4 July 25, 1996 Water and Wastewater System Impact Fee Update Report LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS POS - Parks and Open Spaces PD, SU, FP, AG, Planned Dev. , Spec. Use, Flood Plains, etc. 2. Zoning Districts (As Noted Above) 3. Tarrant County Appraisal District (T.A.D.) Grids 4. Areas projected to Develop in the Next 10 Years (Cross - hatched) Determined by Community Development Department Staff Page 5 July 25, 1996 Water and Wastewater System Impact Fee Update Report LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AREA TABLE 1. Grid Area Number - T.A.D. Grid Numbers 2. Land Use Category - Land Use Assumptions (See above) 3. Existing Developed Areas (Acres) - Determined from G.I.S. Database 4. Areas to be Developed in Next 10 Years - Projected by Community Development Staff 5. Areas to be Developed Beyond the Next 10 Years - Remaining Ultimate Undeveloped Areas 6. Total Land Area - Sum of 3. , 4. , and 5. 7. Percent of Land Currently Developed - Ratio of Existing Developed Areas for Each Land Use Category to Total Land Area for the Grid 8. Percent Developed Within Next 10 Years - Ratio of Currently Undeveloped Land Projected to Develop in the Next 10 Years to the Total Land Area for the Grid 9. Percent Developed Beyond 10 Years - Ratio of Remaining Undeveloped Land (Ultimate) to the Total Land Area for the Grid 10. Percent of Total Developed - Ratio of Total Land Area for Each Land Use Category to the Total Land Area in the Grid Page 6 July 25, 1996 Water and Wastewater System Impact Fee Update Report LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ANALYSIS The table following on the next page ( "Populations Estimates for North Richland Hills ") was furnished by the Community Development Department, and shows historical and projected Residential Populations for the City from 1980 to the 1996. Also shown in this table are occupancy rate trends. For purposes of this Impact Fee Update Study, the current residential population is assumed by be approximately 51,800. Occupancy rates are assumed to be 96% for LDR and MDR property, and 88% for HDR properties. The average population densities used in this study, to project future probable population growth, are computed based on the following assumptions: 1. Existing developed Residential Land Use Areas (see Appendix Table) LDR 5,590.906 acres MDR 175.565 acres SF 5,766.471 acres HDR 281.157 acres 2. Assume 2.72 persons per occupied unit for Single and Multi- Family Areas 3. Total Existing Single Family Units are 13,896 + 423 = 14,319 units 4. Total Existing Multi- Family Units are 5,875 5. Total Existing Single Family Population = 14,319 x 2.72 x 0.96 = 37,390 6. Total Existing Multi- Family Population =5,875 x 2.72 x 0.88 = 14,062 7. Assume same occupancy rate levels will exist during next 10 years and also at build -out (ultimate). 8. Single Family Density = 37,390 / 5,766.471 = 6.5 people per acre 9. Multi- Family Density = 14,062 / 281.157 = 50.0 people per acre SENT BY: 7 -25 -96 9 :45 CITY OF N.RICH.HILLS-4 8173544389:# 2/ 2 Population Estimates for North Richland Hills J0.1 Jan.1 Jan.1 Jan. i Jam 1 Jan. t 1980 1990 1991 1992 1999 19944 1993 1M Census Population (1) 30,592 45,895 ALL HOUSING UNITS M E>asfnp Sr unls 11,843 12,183 12,459 12,778 13,245 13,622 Prior Year SF Units Cants. 340 (2) 276 31 9 46 7 3 77 274 ToWSFUnb 8,682 11,843 12,183 12,459 12,778 13,245 13,822 13,896 MF Unb 2,315 5,665 51855 5,855 5,855 5,855 5,755 5,875 (b7 MH Unb 299 423 423 423 423 423 423 423 Total 11,296 18,121 18,461 18,737 19,056 19,523 19,800 20,194 VACANCY RATE M SF Unla 5.61% 4.02% 4.02% 4.02% 4.02% 4.02% 4.02% 4.02% MF Unb 13.35% 12.09% 12.09% 12.09% 12.09% 12.09% 12.019% 12.09% MHUnb 0.00% 8.51% 8.51% 951% 8.51% 8.51% 8.51% 8.51% Overall Rate 7.05% 6.73% 8.73% 6.73% 6."% 6.73% X73% 6.73% VACANT UNITS SF Unix 487 476 490 501 514 532 548 559 MF Unpe 309 708 708 708 708 708 696 710 MH Unk 0 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 Total 796 1,220 1,234 1,245 1,258 1,276 1,279 1,305 OCCUPIED UNITS SF Urie 8,195 11,367 11,693 11,958 12,264 12,713 13,074 13,337 MF un k 2,008 5,147 5,147 5,147 5,147 5,147 51059 5,165 MH Unite 299 387 387 387 387 387 387 387 Total 10,500 16,901 17,227 17,492 17,798 18,247 18,521 18,889 PERSONS PER ocC. UNrr 2.91 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 ESTIMATED _ POPULATION 30, 925 45 1@S 48 M � 8411 49,831 � 50,378 51,=76 (1) 1980 31090 difat are (4) 100 MP unb dDmolished'n'94 Rom fie U.S. Cef= Bureau (5) No ixtspendant survey of v oom robs or persons per (2) SF - Stryle Fan* ocsmgied unit Is avala(rls. 4 I om med that ft vac@M W = Mull Famiy We sd number of pefon per ooagfed unit has ramakW MH = Mobb Home to same as when the oerrsus ananeratlon woe taken Aprl 1, MO. (3) Mrs maMe (5) 120 urft MF in W Page 8 July 25, 1996 Water and Wastewater System Impact Fee Update Report LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Using these population densities, the following current and estimated future population projections are developed from the Proposed Land Use Assumptions Map: POPULATION PROJECTIONS (Areas in Acres / Projected Population) LAND USE POPULATION EXISTING NEXT 10 BEYOND TOTAL CATEGORY DENSITY YEARS 10 YEARS POPULATION LDR 6.50 5,590.91 688.52 629.91 6,909.34 36,341 4,475 4,094 44,910 MDR 6.50 175.57 61.12 55.49 292.18 1,141 397 361 1,899 HDR 50.00 281.16 57.17 70.90 409.23 14,058 2,859 3,545 20,462 TOTALS 6,047.64 806.81 756.30 7,610.75 51,540 7,731 8,000 67,271 Page 9 July 25, 1996 Water and Wastewater System Impact Fee Update Report LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS APPENDIX I .s � -- �■ ■._.VIII I■ C ;;;nq ► • N \\ vNv1\w\\\\\11 m ♦"„ IMES O1'1n111UO1rtI/ : ■1..11 ( �� -■- =:: •: Ir , -: :..1111, :ter_ == • I iii \ � �p bt a,,'� /�\ \ VIII ■' e`O nnn n.::an1•„ �� I _ r.. �AA\ tl� �� ■ -.� �A�` '�. _ NOW RVANOMOW �� r•.., i=ce n■i■ii� �IOtl�� 1 ■1\ _ s { •' , - _ _; .,tutu 0\0P _M_�: ,. - ,,,1,\\ \\ 1 - - _:: -: II,� ; : 111111111 ■� Iwo � e' • .m � \ \\ . all 111 . :1:'{1::: •- • 1111........... ,11.1 '11; ;1 :11;1;111 1111;1 ��, tlllllllln` 1111 e .: :I :I I• -- .1111111111 r■� X11111111111 %III •• 11 . 11111 .r11^l1111! .ill 11141► N, •nlall. IIIIn11m.11; � `4411■ - •�" • � s -- •- % ' 1,1,11111n'Ln1 � t It :�� a.11:: RO.111111'[ /s � I ■� • 111 �a 11. will nIrII, OI 1111111,IP. - =_ = =- IIt11111111•g ' 1's11r_ V _ •r � 1a e: - -: en : - _: � H rIn11 ■Inln I ■1111.11, _ :: : - e ■? 3'y - 4 ; :;i;i;;i;;k "1 'IE; °= == =: =° ° _ ;i iui, in.nm;;: ;;;i; �:; _ • 1 ■II ' : _. =: _� • - i1]._'- aiai:irnr xx ��. ." .1•rrr •� 9ii'[ •C�,i „ �V�IVFl� •., � ��4:r .......'� fd nr1111;� _ ■tumntil 1:: :: -:o == linnir 1 uliut11n1111 " C:1 = ' ll • - • �• • Inure ?� :• :_ : ,�. � nitl� ----:: nnul�a riiii : :iiun... : i,u. �IIIII�IL mn��_ ••• � vunnuu :p.. . •_ • ■ �;. dall(1111111� r' • °� wliiill iii' ,ri:11tN1 :111 f •� ■ �_ 21111111? ii :: :. •n4a 111111. /IIII�\ \\ 1111 • SIR i1 •■rr �,' . N "i!. /IIIIIIIIIIII/. :111111111 lluq unii'� I•u1.: � :ii :iiiii' 1111 :C ■: � �11111a111r1 :• _• :_ : ■u 111,rr \ �Y ■�i,n■ : ■11 �♦ � ■„11. � 1- lk '°� =. I, = �nl��'�.: -u =.. 1■MI■1- e y ,: •; - - -- IOI IIn1! :111,1 ^�. U�p0n11fa • " p1111 111 :: : :;;�. 1. :,.; : �,i I ` Iw ■■ 1 y'MI , 1111 aH ;ita�lI111111• ::11111�.•Itrtf11 .1.1 \1u1 �.flaarl ■I �• t1 .yy. f/ • go ill fir I • _r,I K` • ■ , 1. ■, ■.■ nnl..q n10uut /■► 11 4• Ir i .�:'... -._ �.iu �� ►in u11• 1 1• eau,.• •m nu,,,, m =e� n: �i mmnm: " :•i y ' = •. ii ■.� ■C� ��♦ i:u miurnl +'u " °u it a mnm,atttnuu ♦• a �� .�: - cr•1. u.um: ,t �. : :: !• n uunm unp•Pn•••• ; - p• -_ fnuln - _- � n ■. r■ ��.. • � ru � . �� _ :run .Gm eps. �•1 ■ /rsn 1 \ � .► i .. - S =� ?I/Illlnnlml ,nt,•1/ • ..,. ,,. .: �, •..1111 �` __� �_ _ • ?. •- - rrwr -. IV :. ..= ■ ■, - -' _J_ �.. , \��; , •.,, .J . �._ _ = _:IIIIIIburlpl nor 1 ynn • ;1 1 ►`i 4 ya.no :+. ♦i ♦a11 :I __ - _ _ _ Ip :nnn ?.nr• .•.� ?� ii :111'. - ►i: \ I , •• �'''. -: - e11111I1H11 r111.t:Y rut - t l� '� 10 ra /11f : I ♦ � _ � _ i■ - _ : �1:. II. .� a � \� -��• �1. - �'� �_ _T =- rI I ♦ I. _ � _ - . _prr III . r \ ♦.' __ eunol 11 ' nw,l- u{ ♦1,•• ♦u40 ♦u ■ , 4 - \I .i4 ."H :11■u mu:= :1.r. -,nn Ir.0 IIIII•rr•: �:IU: :n �' I '�• :�i ♦�I I ■Ba rr= - �_ r11n� :MINI ••••• ��- •Ift1m111 � `, .� - nf1• Inul � � I � r. � - _ _ : •IIIIIr1111 t _ : ■ ■Irr � • \ ♦I \ _ - - �- 511 m uum nH 0 . ♦ /an►••� - � - .qua : e■n1lrl .►t / \��\�� _ _ _ _ uu0 n ■r: • - - •m nllu f41 ■`' J ►. q .r \+�.. - - uu nr nn: / _ 'if: %�:ir::r_Raa ?� . �r.�,• ♦ / :� m nn :ufr, +i: .q \.. • ice. -- anon Her '% e■nm 1tn 1t• ...• _ _ tnnn • \ 4 _ _ _ - I unpl ,m 44u .: • isi IC �IIU Lu- I:.uu.ue ' 1 1,m ? .� IIP�I • �::::' \� .. _r :1111��•• r1 null •m, 1 :� 1111 -- -_ 'll::a.1: 41 1_' IIIIIIIr.I un II1 \ - � ••• - - - - - d {II - `� -'•• • • �- .iii :: �,� .111,1: f.r•1■ _- -- \.� - 1 11111tH t ■! ♦ 1111 rnml nn _.•1111 /1 ■rn - in 11 +� � ,' to \ � :i ::; tuHU • •IM •p IIIn � •N: �_ __ }:: - E '� IIIIIIIIIIH.J . � a■: • .• �.i .- _ _ , \- • • ulll::• 1r �i =___ __ -_ __ �: ;� _ 111111111 /i , � ♦ O I i i ^ - _ ..1111111111111 � 14 i r ♦hl :•••- � ri :I + _ 1I111H : � :111111::•t -- -_ _ •.>� •• y /' .i .. •r :: 1_ -_ r• :::1ii \ \;�:rr 1 ■Ilu 1r1•�aaa i1y1111 ■■ :: � aa..% ..._ = e ■7 . _ _p.Ob :�■ = CO ■V ♦ ► �1 • ■mm..mn..m.,, _ n i _]__ q -k,yll' i ii cr ]_ it r.� _ ;p o i rr •�• xx7 . a .a111n11ur .......... .... ...: •m1e.1111:_= un .,:. ' _ ..111.. �, \�i � ♦ r nnnnn n /11ia t ♦r lnm:. ul: v: •_ :_ � \ \ \ \_�,'..; 1 111 A.l �'a.. r7 '7A♦ IIIIIIJ� \_ :111111_: _ _ -__ • ilX • • • i•nn/l : \r � �1� �'• t nnn..nn mnn ■? �C ' /:: =.::. _ .- ._ -1 -. .... '.: mm�l•.m mnn .i ■■ r • ■••J:'I �_` :el. .. �� ug_ _ : an1n1n1u!1� \ �O\�\ + ■ - !'� ■ ■� _ 1 /1� �• __ :: 1 ■� ��`��\� "� _R ■° .�...r Da ■ _ uuuu °a1 _ :ere: = -. • o _ un \�\\ \,■'■I 1 ■� 1.■ :.�f� _C -- __ : _,.. G� F ` 1 1 � ■_ C;:J `g'1' mnnw \\\ \` - ::.1 ■■■ �.nnunuuuai a'_5_..6 =�1a \�_:_ : 1 • _ a��•1 :• _ __ _- -- _ ;,� ��i 1� :�fn:.,� = 111111111111111111111 ',IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII S.f ".5.1 °It: : • \�� - _ "r• �: ._J n yQ /nlnno`,.��•.....q i � n =:n:= i.�1i1 etc •nnn: u _ � \ ♦� �_ _�; �. It1 1• ♦ �; ��s,•��,;::1■.:.an; {;I;;i {;:'.: : e: __ ::' � \ � �� a ■nl Inn nn: =1 n = _ _��` ��i� � C \� \\ �;puru 11w.�: .r.. i ,., �, _ " - \ . 7 �� 1■�■ .� ■ ■ ■(uu�uHl I■ _LLI:IIPnln1: r " : _: �% • ��■ / wn, .nr:.- �N p.. 4�•. y.. ...rn. 1r1 ■•.n - --- _ �■ \ ..,111111111' on, =;_, .,. I.: .mnn "•' - -- -- -' g..1.1r1.1n1._ � \\ hnnll• -e e:: •••'/ • • -_ mmn : _:_ _: _a : �;iiiim � � \ � ; �ii�iiiiiiii •`•+ - lnnnu11111 i '�.: fj .Y•3i ■ ■�I� J L • •� :i � �i : - C � °? •� •e: - - ' --- - _ .._r a r.. -nnn,' �■ - .1:' in'�I ■_ o • ° :`.:E �.e =_:� _ .runlnnnn.e = :c52_ =- �•• - _ =-= =1n1: , �1'// ■■ nlnn ■li -- ro ...a.�: ! _ ■f .� _�;♦ ' - ' - La:.ua ep; e: nunuunn ::se::::•_: :1■ _ ,_ - _ ..._ , -;�� °° °'114 =�. �: �• /uun. �vnur 4, :'. ?� . .1n11 � - _ - - _= r /i''.iSo•.:. :e:..__ r� ■ .l�_.uinui.•• ,1 ,�"�.::: __ , �Ia. ; ,, 1 . �►.....1rI �I.1•, ° 'i :: � qt -: nn.e.n.l■ e_ :e : - ^'-' _ a _- _- _ : ��• -_ _ e +4 b�>,„ -.,./ many ::;:'•'q- • - . _nom♦ . .. t - Li: ' .n : .a� 1 m• �.: nln un, - -- ^!S: ►' ♦, �O• : _ _- _ ■� •_ :�.z' _ I :AC .w� ° ..ut•r - i inn pvn •• 1. •i ::I. . I. : - - ..� .■ _ =e �_ ��_ __ _ .r:•3'�' ens,'; • //Hum ��.u.0 �;J - :- 1D .r i1� 0unnnnummN ?' - -- 5 °�:' i C nt■� __ _ - ___ - '...� A IL_. _ I: YRnf... - wnrogi::w: - Huai •ri1T1.1•-'_1 ■ •a :: ::1: .,�, ___: '... '• �;J: - 11= "t'il;= (' :� - w::' - :11:1 pniin •r :i • -. �: _ 6"1: r : _ nnl�s u9' `^'�71■■n� I "2.. = C . - m• • �� '. n.a 1ir: •i' .� 111a:.11a �, -'J.1 1 ■ �I _ a+d. �: - - _ .`:,.' . .. -�. er...:: - _ :ununnnny•nuun ' ' "' 1..;u: ,�� __ ennonnn_ :,.1.1111 a - x • •■ '� ` ; • • o •� nun/ : nn!�� .� , __ _O_O_ .r :,�:GUn::, � ►.1 :: � ? - =: r•�: _� 1n11n11n11.:.nl.lnru,,- ":. H nn1 1 .�- -�- -•- II ■ = - - -- i : :_ __ __ _: :_ y i e •n1lq�.,�►�I•. -- _: -_.._ :� -, d ' .,�i� ' _ - � . '::r 11111nf1111n1'.r 11111111 \ 9 & : � f _. _. � ' ■ - • o �ii:i ::c ='__ -^ _ Inr. � \■ °; - = � ' iunnmwn ■ ^•♦ . y, '•.r ll rn annul• 't'�: ,... - _I' IE fIi►4►Gu .'S� � ' - •• Han'. �' : nir♦:1 . � ° 'ei :5 : Z r ♦. � t. . -`, � f 'r11 /, 111111611.16 Id1ft.. �i 11 w 4. , '�. i l 6 = T- � f �' � �� :: iie ?_m,i1 :a _ _:, p��l;J�, Jam /1 ► � _:.11i11n( _.: - �b � 11 yi1 i:81d' - Y - _ � ■1.111. - - .• � •.♦ a11n ., -1. •uonnuulnrn.•In,. .s ■� : _P .♦_ ■I � ,_ � 1. er... ='e:► .• ♦ .` -u. �a1n1u "a1 - _ ,., > ..t - I . = ' • . O.. •• nom , , { nnmini '`anon 1 na •', a 1111 /111fIII11r1114V1 uu♦ t �? ?fin • / _ - ♦, / �• � N �: • e 9 . • 1:1..1 t � �•� � � .i■ ► Illt ■It ■III_ .iii ' ^�..��P p . •; �' �lnnlnl _ `_ moon r q•. , unrnl /®.. ae e v/ . "�1_ J � :11111111111111111111111111: - -_ O�I pm :.ennui � =nnnmm •,' '` ^ -:. c. ;lac: -: "'.�',. •' Ir ��I_ / ma e: ? uuu� 5:= :o ♦�•uuntat .e °o ° cv,`- ammo___ �Alll L� r�I :naumm annnwm: mm♦ .:.en. y11 u.. � p ,gal ._I °,.,; ..: \■\ /, - -� p . /111111 ' ';:unuuu '' e.mnn11111C$� '•y`J`: ♦'.`.`'In - �1 �r;�: ' �'r..� \\ � \ \� \.e \ \ \ \ :uununn Inunuum5 _Ito■ •., : -+mmu1 pl an..l .- � /11111111_ \ \\ yr ° 71111HIN,0 wnnum�•y `1111 - �. uwnminlii: �� a♦uniiiii '� _ _ _ -_( ,......._�i �11111111111111I1111111111 • Z,, ::lanai t' - ' •• Rlnn_ _ . /anon c.. !, pc " \ \ \♦ \ \�►�\ ..auru111 =: ■ ■ ''i, _annunuL%'" I l i � IIUIIIII. � - ur1i11q 1�.�■1�� -: ' ■ � /� I�'' ♦ J` a � �- \ �� \. uun .,Iqn. nn,,.onll^ `�:�.�•- `'�•]; {• 1 �It - �� •n �� - .. • • \ \ r I ` 1111111,/ I'll I 1 ,�� .... �� ..• .:plr. ... 111111111 :ice � II 1::111 I/tll: �.i�1ii �p�4jC•:: :::;iI1 ,•� � : • 4,�, ._.' - _ _ _ � �� 1 � n'' 1`�� ` d.Au ��\ \ ■ -�. Illll 111 -, �_ al Itllal \1111/ •u�' : t � i \r • .. ' _� \ • - • "• ` � In \ \ . 11 11111 IIL - ' 1� 111111: � ��i, \1 �1 X1111 _;11� � f �p '' � 1 �j� ' ,,11.11 %♦ � Hir \e - ♦ 11 ♦� �'� �� ,. n \ ' Halo emu: mpl::• � u1 ♦ ♦ i .. `S • �' °" . .a �.�,� - ♦ ♦...♦ ■� �. 1p• \ ■ ul tun i�: �ii. ;Amp:: ♦IIi . a •, '�� n � •I � � ■ �� `� �� 1 'S% ,r■ i °i•► ._ ,' �- I � y\ \\ lout:: 1 nia .Ilium: • O•" • Ii / L . /� r pd : } - I ,.i� 111111111.x- .Iq ►i. ♦ 1 Ir ! • I ri: fi9lY V • \'\ �, 111 111111 �j If 1111111 IIIII ■.r1111t1•_Im111 "rr: 1;Im11� -.1111 - •+ t • _ � \ 17011111 �' r ■Itl 1 /lllll� ............ IIIIIIn• __ .. • 1111 � � "!� -�� d ♦ _ - 1 � 1 /111111 � Iy �� 1♦: � iiiiiiiii : mar: �� S n111G� •`• "1 • '•.• • 1. � 1 k�'' 'l xg � �r � • n� � �_ + \ I � � - tl._ L I- _•oye: •:� 1 r,= uu•y_ :C%Y_•, v1.' ,'�• a `� *� �,� .. Ls 'Knu .�1.•i Hunt ,V • puru•tl ;\;�� \ ...u1_� ' /mr o-.m..,♦e G iiliifai:i 'r 'L �:i f h. 3° L., ��- �"',; uu .11 •ti ••'::1 aoNlt - '\,, \\ \ \ \\ \\ n .' Lt i = XXXR:t:I } :R3A:Ri �� ♦/ �i 1 [. ;o�: 1 '� . v^ �!.♦ K ice• >` r;ri411` a +.. ., • §. tl +. 1, \�� ... ... uem : •! � .r /!!tu 1 n+ '� ��" :. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \�� \ \ \ \ \ \�. -` • • • i • � :� ` u;, vumii: e" ° ;:•.rem _ . n.. ', ' %l� - _- •un -_ . ' : mnn r \ . ■ tn. 5.uull,u , v ui' -- .a ;` �_ =•: - 111•: ■nom I - .11.• Ill. Iln it ■Ira ■♦ r �I % " % 1 D♦ - � au : - / . tV: C= � :•Ii;;io� peg IngS _.'.! ;: = ' . \` _ C: p 1 i..:.: a �1 y ♦x:::. : green �:�� . c■', . • u �� {I ♦s • C y1 O nnn unnn1l„ : .�"'•" ::1a111n;;e \li:lia,i, - _ \ Q �r ` •♦ • i 11eun Iulnmm� : _ _ � p ttO,at`p% A •- i f� p:. � i;uuu: °:�:uiiiiii' :i ?7iniiiiii iiil�imna- � _ :: ;•. ! {1/.■ ■ - nii;in;;i; : t __ '•� w"� \_ •• �a..: ♦a N•♦ - �;iiiiiii 1nn :, =ter � ��iii.�- :61i�, .\ _. � pO��i a11111n• "'r R 11 : ,� � �. • • -('•• -. �: unuiiri nRnamo 3 \ .• .. _uun♦ �♦ Yw� � r qua y'rA - _ n.• a 1 iin •� '•<:• - - ..nnn_ '11unle: 111 • ': _ ••� i• •• � ,' ' ''' � •i: � .� • IIII In � . ►f � .. 1 .. • .. .. . 1 1 1 : il:e• '•1 'i.i�ii•n 1 : 6L' = i 1 I . 1 � 1 . 1 '. ♦� � _ .C. l>. 11 •,iG ... ..,.,..., 1.11 .... _, ►�}'� r '�1° : nu ° ' : 11 ■111LIIF iii i � �' =. : un:nl ii 1':• � :imnm. .nnn ♦♦ -` �Im�` / n♦ . Hanna • mnn : = H 1 • IIn m • 11 _- I�= nm1: := � .r /- ./ry � Ill: "_�. �•�� 111s + ^ p.� nun_ •d�:1 /- ♦111 :+ •• ,nr _ :iw_: +111 } qri••�: ___�_� '`' 1 �" 1111111111I111/u1 ♦.`♦ • ■Ir• �__ • r 11111r1111w11 nor ■ / 111111 •1 . nun 111•• �• O ► i ■ �� I iy'1 ♦ 1/1.:1..p n �: :: :1,•r.'1 O, �r �.�:: rr ♦ v _ ; : :; : : ::Ijl/ ♦ : :: ■■ �� I ■ � ueta �, "r•♦1::'a r. miii iii uiG.::: �•� ��'. ii.w ♦ • /�..:;a./ uun••i� at 0`d5#� •.. :� •��: ■�. , r• 1L1 ♦�•• : :► ' 1 111; 1111111: .: iii Ili 111 riiii =_�niii �9• ` I 9 ^ . � .•••: ,1 � i, •�� • _ o �■ • i. _. • -• ' • 1t ��11 - -•: 1 ", =u ::iil iiio•.:..i r ` � ♦�� •- - .. •■ •. ♦ 1u :: uu 's .. � '� �� /. Imo �, • \ nr,_ n...'1►. ii :i " ♦�,�. �A I: r_i G: °q :1.��:: /i: � %u "` ';x s � ►'6 ♦/ ♦ � Imo_ maw : :° u � 4♦ ♦ - _ � ::•�♦ �• 1 noun _• •: t n � -: f: _ • Iuuuu '.,;r'a'. -- 111 .,.Ir•' . : ' °= = ■1111 ;i ♦ :11 tit �It ■lt tit■ ■yam �' � :: :iii �' ♦I .1rinn :•.nr•_.111 11: C_ ■n■o �_ J ■' -_nn- 1 -_ -_ �:- '� - °1- • hm • iu.Yo. \ �f /1111nn1 :: • 111111111111 :�w�i��i ij i�'+s�;`i�G_G �_lil= �i :: T• : uYlsiu - �• �iiLHhM1 /111Y t '` 7 ►Rt}kl:t. /-1�rtAxx �[ -f� 'tr == = ��t•- ii. ..... ....... :'P %��.C° ■P ,:. - a..1 _ •moon. =uwuu• r ••� w _ l d T ■. "Ii ��.,. 1 z o ♦ _ Ill1 IIIIF4�� _.�::in•mrl.nu•n..1.: ♦ • ♦41 . :::1` .nwHla:nun111n annum: _.� �1 �� _ • •� °• :�� ♦ ♦•: /�y _..:_ Illlurl••�•n1 �: , 1�/1� ,1■11.i �� prlwunm■ w::'uun ►■ :pa ♦♦ �N ■_■ ■1t 1 t111^y � 1 1 / ► llrlHUmnnr.:a u� �Ow..u...l \�� /111.1 • ;rte :1 *•• " "•'• : - o rrpunu■w1 uu■111,U ct.lu:IJ,lI nul. ! _ :111111111 ■rrtr +t // moon :.. l ;; n•uiii(� _ :`� .::Illnm 1 n•_ +Li:: +r •r �I�i rrrnu munuul�- 11 /'i �:: mom_•_ L�n. mfr : :i: 'u ' :ii:;: iA�: � +1 � Z a•�....1 •• ulfnuu nmm..� nuumgm ■1n .- �tll ■11' tIt1141 : f1 �I ��• iumm :: mHPu: o: a_ . •nnrw n •/ ♦♦r • ■ / r ■ nu ■nU 11: CC :• ■411111:1 111 ■1.1 1 j♦ . u o ■ 1 nn ..ua= ° :: :■Hum uu :p;ii : : : :: iiii:!�i /: •% 1 : ■.I+_ ■ 'iii :iii1 -- gllt11:7 ■O41'/ ♦♦ �4 :1111• • ° - �.I �, II _ - u1' 111:IIPHIIII111: __ i . n,.- -__'.: -- •11111 . Ir11 .n nn.n...•t a ►o t � :♦ 1■ u n Inn: p� :". • ♦ VIII: �� :: " _ :p I /; :;; :i :::n1= _::: : : uu 'n• •••� uM1■ °11111 i1 ] /11IF ♦ {. • •♦ �� of ago L1 • O• '- m 1111• - / �� _/ . I■- : 1• •nle ■ :.i:: • ■•r1• ■I 1 111111111 �O1 -�'• ■u4 < +�. ♦4 u�11e :: a ::� :o``♦ �% _ „y. �= _: Z. .... �I� ♦ ♦►�. ♦�...ur11• ..:= �,�� ♦� --,,� �...�J ��n ♦i � 8: •e e: :: n.r..r Ib i,, �, #� ♦ ,PIf f1 � •.� i Ci � .1` I ( I ii : .'O. ♦ �: _- �:• ••_u � ■ a1•, t ♦ ♦ ♦ ,. 1 �� • u =. .. 1._= __ u/ ■- ii :•i ► ♦ i ♦ � � n • ■ � � .'+: i II _ _ � � i I Ir1■ 11 : I � + : : ■ ■1 ■5 I: ■,.� : ?« . ■� � � 11 i�.i• r � Q� ♦ ♦ •H• r � � � -0 _"1 0 IN ♦ ♦ : e �` ; ° I ° ° ....... �` = •:�: = IIIIIIIIII�IIIIII ••,•��•,• _:.: ,pvr / ♦•rmuuu ungl i r r m � � `�♦ `�♦ ` ffr► �■lulnnnn.■ ♦ .g 1144 `�`� t � ` ,� ' �Q� II I:::: • e � '':;: �� p� . u1 �,r �llrlf.�l ♦II 1/� :C•.`� ~�11al�.ito`r.�/ mama. +�� ```�`````�```��``,�',`,`,`, w \ u■►. ■� /♦L ♦ 1 nun � �� Q �� ♦� ��,��♦ / V ■ r `. inn• 0 � tC � :: e_ ' -- -: \`::'n �� • ►1 ♦ ♦i.. ■ ♦i. � � :� �: e - °i � �` uun in ♦ �� ♦ O :a iq ° yOUnwao` ♦�: � � p: ■1: - ?' -_ ' +�� iiA�� ♦p ' �: ♦ %II n n 7J �_: •1 �; .nnI, :: ♦�, �! ,1■tV �• 't�q : e__Sr.`�ii .1� 1r1• '.•::: ii(t:i�� .111111�� IynlO/Q11 - �,� 1111 \� • .� � ♦■ o ■■tit \ \U11 �a i J :l•�� 111 IIIIII►b .'■iunw ° ■H p � ��•��[ =, +.. • ., /,,,; �Irlll■ u1n1 011 : =: " 11"11111 nnliil iii:111� �• , ` ■� ■�� r �.II 1 /1r 11■ �I ut _ .111111111 ■1111111! !111 1 ■ 1n1 , ° °� • _ • c =_ _ �1g111N111111114. 11 1111 ' "'i 11 ■ �■ �: • •1': - 1 1 � ' ' , ,.:,.I - I_I_ f ■� ♦ice • \ice 11111 ■: ■1111 -1411■ •••♦. p ♦i ♦.III �:: =v ►.___ • • rl __.■...♦ • 11 Ir► 1 11/...141 - - --- i- - •_ .. •■ 1 111 • IIIII •11/ • - __ __ .■ u.. •• 1rt■ •r .1 t rfll 11 IIa ' -_ -_ - •' r� ._ a 1nr is r oil "•i1 111 j ■ii =e. n•1u . • ... .., ... . ��' City of North Richland Hills, Texas WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE UPDATE REPORT LAND USE ASSUMPTION AREAS July, 1996 EXIST. DEVEL. DEVEL. TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT GRID LAND DEVEL. NEXT BEYOND LAND OF LAND DEVELOPED DEVELOPED OF AREA USE AREA 10 YEARS 10 YEARS AREA CURRENTLY WITHIN NEXT BEYOND TOTAL NUMBER CATEGORY A( CRES) ACRES ACRES (ACRES) DEVELOPED 10 YEARS 10 YEARS DEVELOPED LDR 4.149 0.000 0.006 4.155 19.62% 0.00% 0.03% 19.65% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 3.313 0.000 1.649 4.962 15.67% 0.00% 7.80% 23.47% COM 5.021 0.000 0.000 5.021 23.75% 0.00% 0.00% 23.75% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 2.808 0.000 0.012 2.820 13.28% 0.00% 0.06% 13.34% POS 1.010 0.000 3.174 4.184 4.78% 0.00% 15.01% 19.79% 72412 TOTAL 16.301 0.000 4.841 21.142 77.10% 0.00% 22.90% 100.00% LDR 248.761 0.000 5.990 254.751 63.92% 0.00% 1.54% 65.46% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 2.985 0.000 0.771 3.756 0.77% 0.00% 0.20% 0.97% COM 23.744 0.000 0.000 23.744 6.10% 0.00% 0.00% 6.10% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 16.309 0.000 90.585 106.894 4.19% 0.00% 23.28% 27.47% 72416 TOTAL 291.799 0.000 97.346 389.145 74.98% 0.00% 25.02% 100.00% LDR 88.564 0.000 0.000 88.564 71.15% 0.00% 0.00% 71.15% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 17.176 0.000 8.639 25.815 13.80% 0.00% 6.94% 20.74% COM 2.719 0.000 1.698 4.417 2.18% 0.00% 1.36% 3.55% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 1.737 0.000 3.944 5.681 1.40% 0.00% 3.17% 4.56% 72420 TOTAL 110.196 0.000 14.281 124.477 88.53% 0.00% 11.47% 100.00% LDR 64.109 0.351 0.535 64.995 25.93% 0.14% 0.22% 26.29% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 2.751 0.000 8.335 11.086 1.11% 0.00% 3.37% 4.48% COM 9.601 18.441 8.423 36.465 3.88% 7.46% 3.41% 14.75% IND 0.251 0.203 0.722 1.176 0.10% 0.08% 0.29% 0.48% PUB 30.236 0.000 3.285 33.521 12.23% 0.00% 1.33% 13.56% POS 97.649 0.705 1.642 99.996 39.50% 0.29% 0.66% 40.45% 72424 TOTAL 204.597 19.700 22.942 247.239 82.75% 7.97% 9.28% 100.00% LDR 19.173 16.873 0.000 36.046 11.23% 9.88% 0.00% 21.11% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 2.712 0.000 0.000 2.712 1.59% 0.00% 0.00% 1.59% COM 4.037 5.228 0.632 9.897 2.36% 3.06% 0.37% 5.80% IND 9.882 60.172 16.305 86.359 5.79% 35.24% 9.55% 50.57% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 31.829 3.929 0.000 35.758 18.64% 2.30% 0.00% 20.94% 72428 TOTAL 67.633 86.202 16.937 170.772 39.60% 50.48% 9.92% 100.00% LDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 0.326 0.000 0.000 0.326 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 78412 TOTAL 0.326 0.000 0.000 0.326 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% Page 1 of 7 City of North Richland Hills, Texas WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE UPDATE REPORT LAND USE ASSUMPTION AREAS July, 1996 EXIST. DEVEL. DEVEL. TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT GRID LAND DEVEL. NEXT BEYOND LAND OF LAND DEVELOPED DEVELOPED OF AREA USE AREA 10 YEARS 10 YEARS AREA CURRENTLY WITHIN NEXT BEYOND TOTAL NUMBER CATEGORY AC( RES) ACRES A( CRES) A( CRES) DEVELOPED 10 YEARS 10 YEARS DEVELOPED LDR 121.319 0.000 0.626 121.945 55.04% 0.00% 0.28% 55.33% MDR 10.121 0.000 0.511 10.632 4.59% 0.00% 0.23% 4.82% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 65.691 0.000 4.515 70.206 29.80% 0.00% 2.05% 31.85% IND 15.613 0.000 0.919 16.532 7.08% 0.00% 0.42% 7.50% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 0.195 0.000 0.900 1.095 0.09% 0.00% 0.41% 0.50% 78416 TOTAL 212.939 0.000 7.471 220.410 96.61% 0.00% 3.39% 100.00% LDR 354.200 0.000 3.853 358.053 66.65% 0.00% 0.73% 67.38% MDR 15.227 0.000 3.581 18.808 2.87% 0.00% 0.67% 3.54% HDR 24.886 0.000 13.441 38.327 4.68% 0.00% 2.53% 7.21% COM 54.312 0.000 17.243 71.555 10.22% 0.00% 3.24% 13.47% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 24.494 0.000 0.300 24.794 4.61% 0.00% 0.06% 4.67% POS 10.596 0.000 9.262 19.858 1.99% 0.00% 1.74% 3.74% 78420 TOTAL 483.715 0.000 47.680 531.395 91.03% 0.00% 8.97% 100.00% LDR 313.337 0.000 0.000 313.337 62.43% 0.00% 0.00% 62.43% MDR 1.230 0.000 0.000 1.230 0.25% 0.00% 0.00% 0.25% HDR 9.619 0.000 0.000 9.619 1.92% 0.00% 0.00% 1.92% COM 90.917 0.867 27.417 119.201 18.11% 0.17% 5.46% 23.75% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 47.053 0.000 4.689 51.742 9.38% 0.00% 0.93% 10.31% POS 6.762 0.000 0.007 6.769 1.35% 0.00% 0.00% 1.35% 78424 TOTAL 468.918 0.867 32.113 501.898 93.43% 0.17% 6.40% 100.00% LDR 157.348 0.000 0.438 157.786 29.44% 0.00% 0.08% 29.52% MDR 27.678 2.658 0.211 30.547 5.18% 0.50% 0.04% 5.72% HDR 37.305 0.006 9.425 46.736 6.98% 0.00% 1.76% 8.74% COM 83.345 10.221 30.488 124.054 15.59% 1.91% 5.70% 23.21% IND 78.403 26.599 48.853 153.855 14.67% 4.98% 9.14% 28.79% PUB 13.013 0.000 0.000 13.013 2.43% 0.00% 0.00% 2.43% POS 4.390 0.000 4.084 8.474 0.82% 0.00% 0.76% 1.59% 78428 TOTAL 401.482 39.484 93.499 534.465 75.12% 7.39% 17.49% 100.00% LDR 118.790 0.000 0.038 118.828 36.54% 0.00% 0.01% 36.55% MDR 3.792 17.145 21.152 42.089 1.17% 5.27% 6.51% 12.95% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 39.215 7.390 5.049 51.654 12.06% 2.27% 1.55% 15.89% IND 24.723 0.000 62.940 87.663 7.60% 0.00% 19.36% 26.96% PUB 19.359 0.000 0.000 19.359 5.95% 0.00% 0.00% 5.95% POS 5.511 0.000 0.000 5.511 1.70% 0.00% 0.00% 1.70% 78432 TOTAL 211.390 24.535 89.179 325.104 65.02% 7.55% 27.43% 100.00% LDR 150.846 50.135 43.295 244.276 47.21% 15.69% 13.55% 76.46% MDR 1.161 0.018 0.000 1.179 0.36% 0.01% 0.00% 0.37% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 11.492 26.044 20.235 57.771 3.60% 8.15% 6.33% 18.08% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 7.933 0.000 8.335 16.268 2.48% 0.00% 2.61% 5.09% 78436 TOTAL 171.432 76.197 71.865 319.494 53.66% 23.85% 22.49% 100.00% Page 2 of 7 City of North Richland Hills, Texas WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE UPDATE REPORT LAND USE ASSUMPTION AREAS July, 1996 EXIST. DEVEL. DEVEL. TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT GRID LAND DEVEL. NEXT BEYOND LAND OF LAND DEVELOPED DEVELOPED OF AREA USE AREA 10 YEARS 10 YEARS AREA CURRENTLY WITHIN NEXT BEYOND TOTAL NUMBER CATEGORY A( CRES) A( CRES) A( CRES) AC( RES) DEVELOPED 10 YEARS 10 YEARS DEVELOPED LDR 278.894 7.384 5.019 291.297 88.43% 2.34% 1.59% 92.36% MDR 6.611 0.056 0.000 6.667 2.10% 0.02% 0.00% 2.11% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 0.547 0.000 10.363 10.910 0.17% 0.00% 3.29% 3.46% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 0.812 0.000 5.695 6.507 0.26% 0.00% 1.81% 2.06% 78440 TOTAL 286.864 7.440 21.077 315.381 90.96% 2.36% 6.68% 100.00% LDR 106.100 0.000 1.959 108.059 65.96% 0.00% 1.22% 67.18% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 2.071 30.247 4.200 36.518 1.29% 18.81% 2.61% 22.70% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 0.733 0.000 15.534 16.267 0.46% 0.00% 9.66% 10.11% 78444 TOTAL 108.904 30.247 21.693 160.844 67.71% 18.81% 13.49% 100.00% LDR 114.617 0.000 2.222 116.839 29.87% 0.00% 0.58% 30.45% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 6.830 0.000 0.000 6.830 1.78% 0.00% 0.00% 1.78% COM 177.676 0.000 43.046 220.722 46.30% 0.00% 11.22% 57.52% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 26.012 0.000 0.000 26.012 6.78% 0.00% 0.00% 6.78% POS 6.136 0.000 7.171 13.307 1.60% 0.00% 1.87% 3.47% 84420 TOTAL 331.271 0.000 52.439 383.710 86.33% 0.00% 13.67% 100.00% LDR 282.687 0.001 0.399 283.087 58.25% 0.00% 0.08% 58.33% MDR 17.418 0.000 0.266 17.684 3.59% 0.00% 0.05% 3.64% HDR 6.967 0.000 0.000 6.967 1.44% 0.00% 0.00% 1.44% COM 135.466 11.595 7.355 154.416 27.91% 2.39% 1.52% 31.82% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 19.615 0.000 0.000 19.615 4.04% 0.00% 0.00% 4.04% POS 3.521 0.000 0.000 3.521 0.73% 0.00% 0.00% 0.73% 84424 TOTAL 465.674 11.596 8.020 485.290 95.96% 2.39% 1.65% 100.00% LDR 329.292 0.000 12.329 341.621 59.77% 0.00% 2.24% 62.00% MDR 11.782 35.937 2.440 50.159 2.14% 6.52% 0.44% 9.10% HDR 30.963 0.000 7.757 38.720 5.62% 0.00% 1.41% 7.03% COM 24.873 0.000 31.466 56.339 4.51% 0.00% 5.71% 10.23% IND 0.000 0.000 0.530 0.530 0.00% 0.00% 0.10% 0.10% PUB 12.320 0.000 0.000 12.320 2.24% 0.00% 0.00% 2.24% POS 21.874 0.000 29.402 51.276 3.97% 0.00% 5.34% 9.31% 84428 TOTAL 431.104 35.937 83.924 550.965 78.25% 6.52% 15.23% 100.00% LDR 204.589 0.014 56.503 261.106 37.13% 0.00% 10.26% 47.39% MDR 56.707 5.306 10.013 72.026 10.29% 0.96% 1.82% 13.07% HDR 7.876 0.000 0.968 8.844 1.43% 0.00% 0.18% 1.61% COM 49.929 25.872 63.183 138.984 9.06% 4.70% 11.47% 25.23% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 60.169 0.000 0.041 60.210 10.92% 0.00% 0.01% 10.93% POS 9.793 0.000 0.000 9.793 1.78% 0.00% 0.00% 1.78% 84432 TOTAL 389.063 31.192 130.708 550.963 70.62% 5.66% 23.72% 100.00% Page 3 of 7 City of North Richland Hills, Texas WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE UPDATE REPORT LAND USE ASSUMPTION AREAS July, 1996 EXIST. DEVEL. DEVEL. TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT GRID LAND DEVEL. NEXT BEYOND LAND OF LAND DEVELOPED DEVELOPED OF AREA USE AREA 10 YEARS 10 YEARS AREA CURRENTLY WITHIN NEXT BEYOND TOTAL NUMBER CATEGORY (ACRES (ACRES) ACRES ACRES DEVELOPED 10 YEARS 10 YEARS DEVELOPED LDR 398.255 0.000 13.100 411.355 72.28% 0.00% 2.38% 74.66% MDR 23.838 0.000 17.314 41.152 4.33% 0.00% 3.14% 7.47% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 57.077 0.000 10.698 67.775 10.36% 0.00% 1.94% 12.30% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 10.847 0.000 0.157 11.004 1.97% 0.00% 0.03% 2.00% POS 19.679 0.000 0.000 19.679 3.57% 0.00% 0.00% 3.57% 84436 TOTAL 509.696 0.000 41.269 550.965 92.51% 0.00% 7.49% 100.00% LDR 407.925 1.433 46.513 455.871 74.04% 0.26% 8.44% 82.74% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 14.446 0.000 7.030 21.476 2.62% 0.00% 1.28% 3.90% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 34.898 0.000 0.000 34.898 6.33% 0.00% 0.00% 6.33% POS 1.116 0.000 37.604 38.720 0.20% 0.00% 6.83% 7.03% 84440 TOTAL 458.385 1.433 91.147 550.965 83.20% 0.26% 16.54% 100.00% LDR 310.746 75.372 42.016 428.134 57.42% 13.93% 7.76% 79.11% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 7.589 3.921 1.928 13.438 1.40% 0.72% 0.36% 2.48% POS 0.314 19.719 79.557 99.590 0.06% 3.64% 14.70% 18.40% 84444 TOTAL 318.649 99.012 123.501 541.162 58.88% 18.30% 22.82% 100.00% LDR 45.869 65.858 4.706 116.433 17.91% 25.71% 1.84% 45.45% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 4.802 20.796 0.000 25.598 1.87% 8.12% 0.00% 9.99% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 4.425 40.550 69.159 114.134 1.73% 15.83% 27.00% 44.55% 84448 TOTAL 55.096 127.204 73.865 256.165 21.51% 49.66% 28.83% 100.00% LDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 12.902 0.000 0.000 12.902 82.36% 0.00% 0.00% 82.36% COM 0.231 0.000 0.000 0.231 1.47% 0.00% 0.00% 1.47% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 2.532 0.000 0.000 2.532 16.16% 0.00% 0.00% 16.16% POS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 90420 TOTAL 15.665 0.000 0.000 15.665 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% LDR 106.701 0.000 0.666 107.367 32.51% 0.00% 0.20% 32.71% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 80.292 0.000 0.000 80.292 24.46% 0.00% 0.00% 24.46% COM 106.947 18.111 5.171 130.229 32.58% 5.52% 1.58% 39.67% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 8.491 0.000 0.000 8.491 2.59% 0.00% 0.00% 2.59% POS 1.861 0.000 0.000 1.861 0.57% 0.00% 0.00% 0.57% 90424 TOTAL 304.292 18.111 5.837 328.240 92.70% 5.52% 1.78% 100.00% Page 4 of 7 City of North Richland Hills, Texas WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE UPDATE REPORT LAND USE ASSUMPTION AREAS July, 1996 EXIST. DEVEL. DEVEL. TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT GRID LAND DEVEL. NEXT BEYOND LAND OF LAND DEVELOPED DEVELOPED OF AREA USE AREA 10 YEARS 10 YEARS AREA CURRENTLY WITHIN NEXT BEYOND TOTAL NUMBER CATEGORY AC( RES) ACRES ACRES ACRES DEVELOPED 10 YEARS 10 YEARS DEVELOPED LDR 51.921 16.939 34.792 103.652 12.14% 3.96% 8.13% 24.23% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 26.493 57.162 19.919 103.574 6.19% 13.36% 4.66% 24.21% COM 41.065 7.158 28.689 76.912 9.60% 1.67% 6.71% 17.98% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 90.284 0.000 0.000 90.284 21.10% 0.00% 0.00% 21.10% POS 9.142 0.000 44.274 53.416 2.14% 0.00% 10.35% 12.49% 90428 TOTAL 218.905 81.259 127.674 427.838 51.17% 18.99% 29.84% 100.00% LDR 106.502 216.637 53.040 376.179 19.34% 39.35% 9.63% 68.32% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 8.087 0.000 0.000 8.087 1.47% 0.00% 0.00% 1.47% COM 35.971 59.346 61.417 156.734 6.53% 10.78% 11.15% 28.47% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 9.600 0.000 9.600 0.00% 1.74% 0.00% 1.74% POS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 90432 TOTAL 150.560 285.583 114.457 550.600 27.34% 51.87% 20.79% 100.00% LDR 372.712 20.397 90.714 483.823 67.65% 3.70% 16.46% 87.81% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 7.984 14.797 2.451 25.232 1.45% 2.69% 0.44% 4.58% IND 15.596 0.000 6.923 22.519 2.83% 0.00% 1.26% 4.09% PUB 19.378 0.000 0.011 19.389 3.52% 0.00% 0.00% 3.52% POS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 90436 TOTAL 415.670 35.194 100.099 550.963 75.44% 6.39% 18.17% 100.00% LDR 346.155 34.168 78.627 458.950 62.83% 6.20% 14.27% 83.30% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 16.333 15.906 27.825 60.064 2.96% 2.89% 5.05% 10.90% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 2.029 0.000 5.378 7.407 0.37% 0.00% 0.98% 1.34% POS 0.120 0.000 24.423 24.543 0.02% 0.00% 4.43% 4.45% 90440 TOTAL 364.637 50.074 136.253 550.964 66.18% 9.09% 24.73% 100.00% LDR 159.969 80.493 69.744 310.206 29.03% 14.61% 12.66% 56.30% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 14.697 11.855 28.180 54.732 2.67% 2.15% 5.11% 9.93% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 40.420 41.575 104.032 186.027 7.34% 7.55% 18.88% 33.76% 90444 TOTAL 215.086 133.923 201.956 550.965 39.04% 24.31% 36.65% 100.00% LDR 221.973 97.055 16.137 335.165 42.57% 18.61% 3.09% 64.28% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 30.202 28.910 75.328 134.440 5.79% 5.54% 14.45% 25.78% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 13.582 28.265 9.961 51.808 2.60% 5.42% 1.91% 9.94% 90448 TOTAL 265.757 154.230 101.426 521.413 50.97% 29.58% 19.45% 100.00% Page 5 of 7 City of North Richland Hills, Texas WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE UPDATE REPORT LAND USE ASSUMPTION AREAS July, 1996 EXIST. DEVEL. REVEL. TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT GRID LAND DEVEL. NEXT BEYOND LAND OF LAND DEVELOPED DEVELOPED OF AREA USE AREA 10 YEARS 10 YEARS AREA CURRENTLY WITHIN NEXT BEYOND TOTAL NUMBER CATEGORY A( CRES) ACRES (ACRES) ACRES DEVELOPED 10 YEARS 10 YEARS DEVELOPED LDR 36.704 0.000 14.937 51.641 47.47% 0.00% 19.32% 66.79% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 3.979 7.289 14.404 25.672 5.15% 9.43% 18.63% 33.21% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 90452 TOTAL 40.683 7.289 29.341 77.313 52.62% 9.43% 37.95% 100.00% LDR 0.007 0.000 0.004 0.011 0.02% 0.00% 0.01% 0.03% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 5.074 2.858 23.609 31.541 13.15% 7.41% 61.20% 81.76% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 1.424 2.634 2.968 7.026 3.69% 6.83% 7.69% 18.21% POS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 96432 TOTAL 6.505 5.492 26.581 38.578 16.86% 14.24% 68.90% 100.00% LDR 22.969 0.000 5.547 28.516 49.37% 0.00% 11.92% 61.29% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 8.270 0.000 9.742 18.012 17.77% 0.00% 20.94% 38.71% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 96436 TOTAL 31.239 0.000 15.289 46.528 67.14% 0.00% 32.86% 100.00% LDR 14.538 1.907 8.644 25.089 31.91% 4.19% 18.97% 55.06% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 2.246 0.000 0.000 2.246 4.93% 0.00% 0.00% 4.93% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 6.366 0.000 0.000 6.366 13.97% 0.00% 0.00% 13.97% POS 0.423 0.000 11.442 11.865 0.93% 0.00% 25.11% 26.04% 96440 TOTAL 23.573 1.907 20.086 45.566 51.73% 4.19% 44.08% 100.00% LDR 13.582 3.502 17.513 34.597 30.00% 7.73% 38.68% 76.41% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 1.163 2.954 3.646 7.763 2.57% 6.52% 8.05% 17.15% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 0.000 1.860 1.057 2.917 0.00% 4.11% 2.33% 6.44% 96444 TOTAL 14.745 8.316 22.216 45.277 32.57% 18.37% 49.07% 100.00% LDR 17.603 0.000 0.000 17.603 48.39% 0.00% 0.00% 48.39% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 6.668 0.000 12.109 18.777 18.33% 0.00% 33.28% 51.61% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 96448 TOTAL 24.271 0.000 12.109 36.380 66.72% 0.00% 33.28% 100.00% Page 6 of 7 City of North Richland Hills, Texas WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE UPDATE REPORT LAND USE ASSUMPTION AREAS July, 1996 EXIST. DEVEL. DEVEL. TOTAL PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT GRID LAND DEVEL. NEXT BEYOND LAND OF LAND DEVELOPED DEVELOPED OF AREA USE AREA 10 YEARS 10 YEARS AREA CURRENTLY WITHIN NEXT BEYOND TOTAL NUMBER CATEGORY A( CRES) A( CRES) A( CRES) A� CRES) DEVELOPED 10 YEARS 10 YEARS DEVELOPED LDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HDR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COM 0.110 5.913 0.548 6.571 1.67% 89.98% 8.34% 100.00% IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PUB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% POS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 96452 TOTAL 0.110 5.913 0.548 6.571 1.67% 89.98% 8.34% 100.00% LDR 5,590.906 688.519 629.912 6,909.337 48.51% 5.97% 5.47% 59.95% MDR 175.565 61.120 55.488 292.173 1.52% 0.53% 0.48% 2.54% HDR 281.157 57.168 70.904 409.229 2.44% 0.50% 0.62% 3.55% COM 1,138.247 331.798 586.160 2,056.205 9.88% 2.88% 5.09% 17.84% IND 144.468 86.974 137.192 368.634 1.25% 0.75% 1.19% 3.20% TOTAL PUB 438.917 16.155 18.769 473.841 3.81% 0.14% 0.16% 4.11% ALL POS 317.872 136.603 561.244 1,015.719 2.76% 1.19% 4.87% 8.81% AREAS TOTAL 8,087.132 1,378.337 2,059.669 11,525.138 70.17% 11.96% 17.87% 100.00% Page 7 of 7