HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ 1994-02-10 Minutes
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
OF JANUARY 27,1994
PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS
1. PS 93-34
2. PS 94-04
3. PS 94-07
MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
February 10, 1994 - 7:30 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman James Brock at 7:30 p.m.
PRESENT
Chairman
Members
James Brock
Paul Miller
Don Bowen
Fred Wilson
David Barfield
Wayne Moody
Barry LeBaron
Clayton Husband
Steve Pence
Greg Dickens
Director Plan/lnsp
Planner
Building Official
Public Works Dir
ABSENT
Ron Lueck
Victor Baxter
Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve the minutes. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Miller, and the motion carried 4-0, with Chairman Brock and Mr. Moody
abstaining due to absence at the previous meeting.
Reconsideration of the request of James R. Harris Company for Preliminary Plat of
Shady Oaks Addition, Second Filing. This property is located on the north side of
North Tarrant Parkway, west of Castle Creek Road.
Mr. Terry Mitchell, of Carter & Burgess Engineers, came forward to speak. He stated
the developer has agreed to all engineering comments.
Mr. Wilson made the motion to approve PS 93-34. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Moody, and the motion carried 6-0.
Request of Tejas Testing Technology for Preliminary Plat of Tejas Testing Site No.
20. This property is located at the southwest corner of Davis Boulevard and Ross
Road.
Chairman Brock stated that this item has been withdrawn at this time at the request
of the appl icant.
Request of James Rust for Final Plat of Briarwood Estates, Section 8. This property is
located in the 7500 block of Starnes Road.
Mr. David Washington, 500 Grapevine Highway, came forward to speak. He stated
the primary questions regarding this plat concern drainage. He stated they met with
citizens and city staff to discuss the drainage issues at length. He stated they are
working with the City to resolve downstream drainage problems on Teakwood
Court. He stated the water will be taken underground via new storm sewers. He
stated the lake will be drained to determine what ground water exists in the area.
PZ Minutes - Page 2
February 10, 1994
Chairman Brock stated the Commission met with Mr. Dickens, the Public Works
Director, at 6:00 and received an overview of the meeting with the citizens.
Chairman Brock stated this is not a public hearing, but if anyone wants to come
forward to ask specific questions, they should come forward at this time.
Mr. Mike Wantland, 7320 Plumwood Drive, came forward to speak. He stated 10
of 32 houses on Plumwood Drive have structural damage. He stated the same
problem will occur on this property. He questioned the address on the zoning
notice.
Mr. LeBaron stated that property is rezoned according to legal description, and the
address is given just as a general description of the area the property is in.
Mr. Wantland stated there is I itigation in place on th is property.
Mr. Bowen stated he is not aware of that. He stated the Commission is appointed
by the City Council and made up of ordinary citizens. He stated they try to do what
is best for the city, and th is is not an opponents situation at all.
Mr. Wantland asked who at the Corps of Engineers was contacted in regards to the
wetlands question on this property.
Mr. Dickens stated David Madden. He stated Mr. Wantland could call Mr.
Washington's office to get a direct number to Mr. Madden.
Mr. Washington stated a city staff engineer contacted the Corps regarding wetlands
when this issue was first brought up. He stated some of the reasons the lake did not
qualify for wetlands were that it is not on a natural stream and is man-made. He
stated they have sent the Corps a copy of the plat and a letter, and are awaiti ng a
written response. Mr. Washington stated the Corps will look at the property since
the possibility of a natural spring exists. He stated if the lake is under 1-acre, it
would not qualify for wetlands status.
Mr. Wantland stated the Commission needs to look at this issue more closely. He
stated the stock tank was there in 1980. He stated there are french drains under the
property. He stated if this item continues, they will take this to court.
Mr. Ross Hood, 7516 Teakwood Court, came forward to speak. He asked if the
drainage system downstream would be in place before the property develops. He
asked how the pond will be drained.
Mr. Washington stated the water in the pond will be pumped out in a controlled
fashion.
Mr. Dickens stated that the off-site improvements wi II have to be made before onsite
improvements can commence.
Mr. Randall Toddy, 7329 Post Oak, came forward to speak. He asked if the dam
will be breached when the water is pumped out.
Mr. Washington stated the purpose of pumping the water out is to control discharge.
He stated the dam will be breached in order to get into the pond to clean it out. He
stated if the decision is made not to develop, the dam can be rebuilt.
PZ Minutes - Page 3
February 10, 1994
Mr. Tom Harris, 7344 Plumwood Drive, came forward to speak. He asked if the
plat can be delayed pending the Corps of Engineers response.
Mr. Dickens stated the Corps intends to look at it, and the city is trying to contact
them in regards to this property. He stated he was not sure when a written response
would be received.
Mr. Harris requested the Commission delay the approval of this plat until the Corps
responds.
Mr. Clinton Johnson, 7345 Plumwood Drive, came forward to speak. He stated he
spent $9,000 to repair damage to his foundation. He stated his concern over future
property val ues.
Mr. Moody asked when the damage to the home was discovered.
Mr. Johnson stated last year.
Mr. Randy Moresi, 7332 Plumwood Drive, came forward to speak. He stated he is
not against the development of this property. He stated this is a very unusual piece
of property, and water stands on it constantly. He asked if there was any
consideration given to detention ponds on the south end of the project.
Mr. Dickens stated the city did look at detention ponds on the property as one
alternative to hand ling the 100-year storm. He stated the other alternative was the
proposed solution that was determined hydraulically to handle the 100-year flood.
He stated staff is not in the position to require or recommend which option the
developer chooses.
Mr. Moresi stated he did not think the Commission was trying to trick the
neighborhood. He requested that the Commission do more work on this plat before
a recommendation is made.
Mr. Don Johnson, 7552 Starnes Road, came forward to speak. He asked what the
side building line on the lot adjacent to him was.
Mr. Husband stated the side building line is 20-feet.
Mr. Johnson stated his building line is 25-feet. He asked how far from the curb the
first house would be.
Mr. Husband stated approximately 35-feet from the curb line.
Mr. Johnson stated he would look out his window and would see a fence.
Mr. Pence stated proposed lot 27 has a 20-foot building line on Starnes, and the
fence could come out as far as that 20-foot building line. He stated the fence would
be about 30-feet from the back of the curb. He asked if Mr. Johnson's house was on
the 25-foot front building line.
Mr. Johnson stated no, that the house was set back further than that. He stated he
contacted the Corps of Engineers before anyone else. He stated the school has had
structural problems.
Ms. Kerri Toddy, 7329 Post Oak Drive, came forward to speak. She stated her
concern over the drainage on the property. She requested that the Commission
postpone this plat until the issues are worked out.
PZ Minutes - Page 4
February 10, 1994
Mr. Bob Smith, 7509 Teakwood Court, came forward to speak. He stated
Teakwood Court floods each time it rains. He stated his concern over the runoff
from the property.
Mr. Clinton Johnson appeared again before the Commission. He stated his concerns
over future property val ues.
Mr. Barfield stated he has built many houses and repaired many foundations. He
stated the problem experienced by the homeowners is not unique to this area. He
stated the soil condition in this area is known as the Woodbine formation, with
migrating layers of sand and clay. He stated the clay expands from time to time.
Mr. Barfield stated the pond is not serving as a detention pond. He stated he would
like to see certain conditions added to the plat. He stated he wants to see the Corps
report and the downstream drainage complete before the plat is filed. He stated the
platting will allow the storm sewers in the adjacent properties to tie into a system
and flow freely.
Mr. Moody stated he owned a home that had similar problems due to a vacant lot
next door. He stated the water problem was eliminate and a new home was built
on the lot without any problems. He stated he believes that if the water problem is
solved and the are is dewatered, it would improve the stability of the area.
Mr. Wilson asked Mr. Dickens when the pond is drained, how often will the city
inspect the property, and is the property developable if the pond is spring fed.
Mr. Dickens stated the inspectors and an engineer will visit the site periodically as
they drain the pond. He stated if the land will not dry out and they cannot put any
fill in, they could not meet the compaction requirements for the street. He stated
they normally try french drains first. He stated if it needs further work, specialists
will be brought in to take a look at the situation.
Mr. Wilson asked if it is possible that the project may not happen.
Mr. Dickens stated that is always a possibility.
Mr. Mark Kite, 7348 Plumwood Drive, came forward to speak. He stated the lake is
spring fed. He stated the property stays wet for a long time after it rains. He asked
how much fill will be placed on the property.
Chairman Brock stated the city has certain criteria that each development has to
meet. He stated the decisions of the Commission are based on the reports from city
staff on whether the criteria have or can be met.
Mr. Kite stated he was required to build his house 1-foot above the curb line.
Mr. Dickens stated the current criteria calls for the finished floor to be one-foot
above the curb at the center line of the lot. He stated if the owner does not want to
do that, they are required to submit a grading plan, sealed by a Professional
Engineer, that shows where the water flows. He stated the developer will be
required to meet the natural grade at the rear of the property. Mr. Dickens stated
the engi neer has shown fl umes at the rear of all properties to bri ng the water
downstream into the storm sewer system.
Mr. Barfield asked if the proposed street would be lower than the adjacent streets.
Mr. Dickens stated the grading shown on the plans indicate that.
PZ Minutes - Page 5
February 10, 1994
Mr. Washington stated the lots on the east side of Plumwood and the west side of
Post Oak drain onto this property. He stated they will have to match the grade of
Starnes and bring the street down as quickly as possible to match the grade level of
the adjacent lots.
Mr. Larry Armstrong, 7228 Plumwood Drive, came forward to speak. He stated if
he was a developer and bought the property, he would develop it one way or
another. He stated if Starnes Road could be built, houses could be built on this
property .
Mr. Mike Wantland appeared again before the Commission. He asked if all the
comments have been met.
Chairman Brock stated all engineering comments have been agreed to.
Mr. Wantland asked if Corps of Engineers reports have been submitted yet.
Mr. Dickens stated they have not received written responses from the Corps yet.
Mr. Wantland stated the Commission should hold off on approval until this report is
received. He stated his concern over future property values.
Ms. Christina Johnson, 7345 Plumwood Drive, came forward to speak. She stated
once the pond is drained, and if the property does not develop, an eyesore is
created. She stated if it is a spring, the water will have to go somewhere when the
pond is fi lied in.
Mr. Clinton Johnson appeared again before the Commission. He stated some piers
that have been poured have struck water. He stated his concern about the drainage
on the property.
Mr. Barfield stated there is no problem with the layout of the lots, the layout of the
street, or the design of the subdivision. He stated they cannot deny the plat because
it meets all the technical requirements of the city. He stated they should hold this
plat until certain conditions are met.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PS 94-07 with the following additional
requirements: subject to engineers comments, the Corps of Engineers decision
concerning wetlands status be determined, the downstream storm sewer be in place
before the subject property can be developed, and the storm sewers on the property
be tied into the system to alleviate part of the water problem. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Bowen, and the motion carried 4-2 with Mr. Barfield, Mr. Bowen,
Mr. Miller, and Mr. Moody voting for; and Chairman Brock and Mr. Wilson voting
against.
5. PS 94-08
Request of the City of North Richland Hills for a Replat of Lot 2, Block F, Richland
Oaks Addition. This property is located at 8214 Grapevine Highway.
Chairman Brock stated all engineering comments have been addressed. He stated
his only question was why the setback lines are 30-feet.
Mr. LeBaron stated staff will look into that before this replat goes to City Council.
Mr. Moody made the motion to approve PS 94-08. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen, and the motion carried 6-0.
PZ Minutes - Page 6
February 10, 1994
ZONING CASES
Chairman Brock stated the Commission met with Ms. Fern Cagle and Ms. Sharon
Gallion, the two applicants regarding the Personal Care Homes. He stated there
were still a few items that needed to be submitted. He stated these two cases would
be tabled until the next meeting.
5. PZ 94-02
Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874
regarding Contractor Shops and Garages.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to
come forward.
Mr. LeBaron stated there are some inconsistencies between what exists in the city
and what the Zoning Ordinance allows.
Mr. Moody made the motion to table PZ 94-02. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Barfield, and the motion carried 6-0.
6. PZ 94-03
Public Hearing to consider the request of Fern Cagle for a Special Use Permit for a
Personal Care Home on Lots 1 A & 1 B, Block 1, Glenview Park Addition. This
property is located at 4025 and 4027 Garden Park Drive.
This item was tabled by the Commission.
7. PZ 94-04
Public Hearing to consider the request of Sharon Gallion for a Special Use Permit
for a Personal Care Home on Lot 11, Block 3, Londonderry Addition. This property
is located at 7917 Londonderry Drive.
This item was tabled by the Commission.
8. PZ 94-05
Public Hearing to consider the request of Richland Hills Church of Christ for a
Special Use Permit for a Tire & Battery Sales Store on Lot 3, Block 25, Snow Heights
Addition. This property is located at 6850 NE Loop 820.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to
come forward at this time.
Mr. Rich DeOtte, representing the Richland Hills Church of Christ, came forward to
speak. He stated he would answer any questions the Commission has regarding this
request.
Chairman Brock stated they are aware of the special zoning conditions placed on
this property by the City Council many years ago.
Mr. Robert Muncie, 6905 Corona Drive, came forward to speak. He stated they
have resided at this address for 22 years. He stated his opposition to the request.
He stated h is concern was the noise that cou Id be generated from the proposed use.
Mr. Moody asked how far from his property will the proposed building be located.
Mr. Muncie stated the property is behind his house.
Chairman Brock stated the developer will have to construct a masonry screening
wall.
PZ Minutes - Page 7
February 10, 1994
Mr. Muncie stated his main objection is noise. He stated he would rather see an
office-type use.
Mr. Gene Hicks, 6909 Corona Drive, came forward to speak. He stated he has
lived in the city for 40 years. He stated the proposed use is not appropriate for the
property. He stated he would rather see offices on the property.
Mr. Bowen asked where the entrances to the work area was located on the building.
He asked what the overhead door on the rear was for.
Mr. Rusty Spiars, engineer for the project, came forward to speak. He stated the
main entrance is on the front. He stated the requirements regarding screening have
been met. He stated no work is performed outdoors.
Mr. Bowen stated if the overhead door on the back is open, it will tunnel the noise
right into the neighborhood.
Mr. Spiars stated the purpose of the screening wall is to abate the noise.
Mr. Wilson asked if there is a decibel level for noise in the C-1 and C-2 Commercial
districts.
Mr. LeBaron stated yes.
Mr. Wilson stated he thinks the level is supposed to drop off at night.
Mr. LeBaron stated the department has a decibel meter and can test and check
decibel levels.
Mr. Spiars stated they will comply with the ordinances and requirements of the city.
Chairman Brock stated this item will go onto the Council on February 28th.
There was general discussion regarding the masonry screening wall.
Mr. Moody stated since this is a Special Use Permit, the Commission has the
authority to require removing the rear door to mitigate the noise levels. He stated
he did not know if this is feasible.
Mr. Spiars stated he would have to consult with the architects on the project
regarding removing the rear door.
Mr. Bowen stated the door could be relocated to the side of the building on Vance
Road.
Mr. Spiars asked how the noise is monitored.
Chairman Brock stated enforcement officers check the site periodically.
Mr. DeOtte stated the threshold for noise could be based on existing NTW sites or
similar sites.
Mr. Pence stated the current ordinance allows 60 decibels on the A scale from 7
a.m. to 10 p.m., and from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. the maximum allowed is 55 decibels.
PZ Minutes - Page 8
February 10, 1994
Mr. Bowen stated he thought there were more restrictions on the property than there
actually were. He stated he thought the intent of the Council was to allow offices
and similar types of development.
Mr. Wilson stated he is not sure whether this use can meet the decibel levels or not.
Mr. Spiars asked where the decibel readings are taken.
Mr. Husband stated at the property line.
Mr. LeBaron stated the numbers mentioned in the ordinance, combined with
experience with other sites, may indicate a problem with noise from this site. He
stated the levels mentioned are not very high.
Mr. Pence stated from some of the testing they have done, the persons at this
meeting are probably speaking at 70 decibels.
Chairman Brock stated this item could be tabled until the next meeting to look at the
other NTW sites around the area.
Mr. Barfield stated that staff should go out and test the site as it is now and set that as
the level that must be met after the business goes in. He stated that way they are not
increasing the amount of noise.
Mr. DeOtte requested that the case be approved contingent upon those
requirements and submitted to Council at the next meeting.
There was general discussion regarding the zoning on the property.
Ms. Jeanann Benefiel, 7000 Corona Drive, came forward to speak. She stated she
can see this property from her front yard. She stated her concern about noise. Ms.
Benefiel stated the pattern of development along the frontage road is offices with a
residential character. She stated a tire store is inappropriate for the character and
aesthetics of the area. She stated her concern over high traffic vol umes. She stated
there are other areas better suited for this type of use.
Mr. Charles Owen, representing the Church of Christ, came forward to speak. He
stated this property was originally zoned multi-family. He stated they rezoned the
property C-1 Commercial, and some restrictions were placed on the property. Mr.
Owen stated a screening wall was required, and they were allowed certain types of
uses on the property. He stated he has visited the NTW site in Irving. He stated
NTW is regulated by the federal government on how much noise they can generate
for the employees benefit. He requested the case be approved and submitted to
Council.
Ms. Benefiel appeared before the Commission again. She stated the area in Irving is
a very commercial area that does not abut a residential area. She stated commercial
development is not appropriate for this area. She stated she would prefer office type
developments in that area.
Mr. Spiars stated NTW would like to locate in North Richland Hills. He stated they
knew the requirements before going in, and all the plans for the project are nearly
complete.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public
Heari ng.
PZ Minutes - Page 9
February 10, 1994
9. PS 94-01
STAFF REPORT
CITIZEN COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
Victor Baxter, Secretary
Planning and Zoning Co
Mr. Moody made the motion to deny PZ 94-05. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Wilson, and the motion carried 4-2, with Mr. Moody, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Bowen, and
Mr. Miller voting for denial, and Mr. Barfield and Chairman Brock
voting against denial.
Mr. Bowen stated the request did not comply with the spirit of what the Council
wanted on this property.
Chairman Brock stated the applicant has ten days to appeal the decision to the City
Council.
Continuation of the Public Hearing to consider amending the Subdivision
Regulations Ordinance No. 1579 in its entirety. TABLED 1/27/94
Chairman Brock stated they discussed this item during the workshop and brought up
some items that need further consideration and work. He stated they would like to
look at those items before this is passed on to the Council.
Mr. Barfield stated he would like to see a work session devoted entirely to these
regulations.
Mr. Wilson made the motion to table PS 94-01. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Bowen, and the motion carried 6-0.
Mr. LeBaron stated the City has received a letter regarding a 165-lot subdivision in
Keller. He stated the area is north of Bursey Road near Londonderry. He stated a
copy of the Public Works Department comments is included in the packet for
informational purposes.
Mr. LeBaron stated a calendar of meeting dates in included in the packet.
None
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.