HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA 1992-04-16 Minutes
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
APRIL 16, 1992 - 7:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7: 30
p . m. by Chairman Tom Duer.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Members
Dir Community Dev
ABSENT:
Tom Duer
Billy Cypert
Steve Ingham
Robert Skinner
Barry LeBaron
Mark Barfield
Jeff Bunting
Jim Kemp
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF
MARCH 30, 1992
Mr. Skinner made the motion to approve the
minutes as written. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Cypert, and the motion
carried 3-0, with Mr. Ingham abstaining
due to absence at the previous meeting.
1. BA 92-05
Request of Anne L. Beasley to vary from
the Zoning Ordinance #1080 on Lot 13,
Block 2, North Richland Hills Addition, to
allow the house and carport to be beyond
the building line. The applicant's property
is located at 4108 Vance Road.
Chairman Duer explained that the Zoning
Board of Adjustment's rules state that for a
motion of carry, it must have four
affirmative votes. He stated since only four
members are present, a unanimous vote is
required for any motion to pass. He stated
he mentioned this in the event that anyone
would want to postpone their case.
Chairman Duer opened the public hearing
and asked for anyone wishing to speak in
favor of the request to come forward.
Anne Beasley, 4108 Vance Road, came
forward to speak. She stated she has
refinanced her home within the last two
months, and for the loan to go through, she
needs a variance. She stated that she
would otherwise have to reclose and accept
a variable-rate loan. She stated she
currently has a fixed -rate loan. She stated
ZBA Minutes, page 2
April 16 , 1992
her house has been standing for over 35
years, and the carport has been there for
over 12 years. She stated she has had no
complaints from the neighbors about her
carport.
Chairman Duer asked if any correspondence
has been received concerning this case.
Mr. LeBaron stated there was no negative
correspondence received.
Chairman Duer commented on the time
interval stating that if there was such a
thing as a grandfather clause, he was sure
this case would meet it.
Chairman Duer asked Ms. Beasley if she
had done any remodeling that required the
refinancing of her home.
Ms. Beasley stated no, that she was
refinancing because she is now a single
parent. She stated the survey of the
property uncovered the house I carport
problem.
Mr. Skinner asked Ms. Beasley if she had
any problem when she closed the first time.
Ms. Beasley stated that she rented the
house and then bought it from the owner by
taking over the payments.
Mr. Skinner asked how old the carport was.
Ms. Beasley stated the carport was about 12
years old, and that she added it to the
house.
Chairman Duer called for those wishing to
speak in opposition to the request to come
forward. There being none, he closed the
public hearing.
Mr. Cypert made the motion to approve BA
92-05 as presented. Mr. Ingham seconded
the motion, and the motion carried 4-0.
BA 92-06
Request of Mr. Larry Lyons to vary from
the Zoning Ordinance #1080 on Lot FR,
Block 14, Richland Terrace Addition, to
install an off-premise sign. This property
is located at 5121 Davis Boulevard. The
ZBA Minutes, page 3
April 16, 1992
applicant's property is located at 5112
Commercial Drive.
Chairman Duer opened the public hearing
and asked for those wishing to speak in
favor of the request to come forward.
Mr. Ron McGough, of Hamm & Sandlin, 5133
Davis Boulevard, came forward to speak.
He stated he was hear to answer any
questions the Board might have.
Mr. Skinner asked who owns the property
on which the sign stands.
Mr. McGough stated that Hamm & Sandlin
owned the property.
Mr. Skinner asked if Hamm & Sandlin leased
the property to the tenants.
Mr. McGough stated yes.
Mr. Skinner asked if he were to move into
an empty space, does part of the lease get
his name on the sign. He asked if that is
his expense or Hamm & Sandlin's.
Mr. McGough stated the original sign was
built for tenants at that location. He stated
if a tenant requested it, they would have
put in the sign. He stated that no one had
wanted to spend the $4000-$5000 it would
take to do it.
Mr. Skinner asked about the little slots
underneath.
Mr. McGough stated that they would work
with the tenants on that.
Mr. Ingham asked if there are any
vacancies on that block.
Mr. McGough stated there is a vacancy
where Pizza Inn skipped out, and that it
has been vacant for about 4 1/2 years.
Mr. Ingham asked about the future of the
space.
Mr. McGough stated they have been trying
to lease it for 4 1/2 years with no luck, but
that they still have some equipment in there
ZBA Minutes, page 4
April 16, 1992
that they haven't been able to do anything
with.
Mr. Skinner asked if someone took
possession of that building, would they still
have to come to Hamm & Sandlin to take
possession of the top portion of the sign.
Mr. McGough stated if a tenant wanted it,
they would vacate the premises and let them
have the sign.
Mr. Skinner asked who maintains the sign.
Mr. McGough stated that Hamm & Sandlin
maintains the sign, and that they pay the
electricity on it.
Chairman Duer asked if the sign necessarily
needs to have an arrow on it. He stated
that it could open the door for others in the
City to think they can put an arrow on a
sign down the road from their business.
Mr. McGough stated the main thing was to
give direction to where Maaco is located.
Mr. Larry Lyons, 5112 Commercial Drive,
came forward to speak. He stated he
wanted the sign to help identify the location
of Maaco.
Mr. Skinner asked if that was the purpose
of the arrow.
Mr. Lyons stated yes.
Mr. Skinner asked if he considered using
"one block east" or the address on the sign.
He stated he didn't think that would be a
conflict on the price.
Mr. Lyons stated that it would not be a
conflict on the price.
Mr. Skinner explained that this is an off-
premise sign, which is not allowed in the
City. He stated that the Board has heard
and judged on similar cases, and the Board
doesn't want to raise a red flag by making
an exception for one person. He asked if
the drawing of the sign is a firm design.
ZBA Minutes, page 5
April 16 , 1992
Mr. Lyons stated the "one block ease"
verbiage might be acceptable, but that the
address would not help. He stated the
street sign says Commercial Street, not
Commercial Drive. He stated he has been
having trouble with people finding his
location.
Chairman Duer stated that a business sign
at a mall or strip center doesn't have arrows
pointing to different sites, but that the
sign tells the customer this is where it is,
now stop and look around. He stated that
drivers will know the building is not on the
other side of Davis Boulevard, and that it
will be close to the sign. He asked if the
building was visible from Davis Boulevard
and if the building had a sign on it.
Mr. Lyons stated that the building was
visible for about 200 yards.
Chairman Duer asked if someone slows down
where the Maaco sign is, can they see the
building from the area of the sign.
Mr. Lyons answered yes, and asked the
Board to look at the pictures that were
submitted.
Mr. Ingham asked if there was any signage
on the property right now.
Mr. Lyons stated that there was a sign on
the building.
Chairman Duer stated that if people slow
down where the sign is, they can see the
sign on the building.
Mr. Skinner commented that the far right
lane on Davis Boulevard allows the driver to
slow down and look without serious traffic
interference. He stated that if the driver
missed the turn, there were three
entrances where they could pull in and get
back around there.
Chairman Duer stated that if the sign is on
the property, people will pull in and look
for Maaco in that center; but if the sign on
ZBA Minutes, page 6
April 16, 1992
the building is sufficient size, they will
probably see it.
Mr. Skinner asked about the colors on the
sign .
Mr. Lyons stated they would be red, white,
and blue.
Chairman Duer stated that the Board must
be careful about what they approve because
they don't want to raise a red flag. He
stated there is nothing worse than a
dormant sign that is not filled up
completely.
Mr. Skinner stated his concern over the
reflective nature of the sign on the building
and that it would naturally draw more
attention. He stated the arrow is his
biggest concern.
Mr. Ingham stated that the arrow might
cause drivers to think that all the
businesses on the sign are that direction.
Chairman Duer agreed that the sign could
affect other businesses.
Mr. Skinner stated the other signs could
move to the top, and Maaco could put their
sign at the bottom.
Chairman Duer stated he was trying to keep
others from asking for similar signs.
Mr. Skinner commented that he appreciated
Mr. McGough for coming out on behalf of
Hamm & Sandlin.
Chairman Duer asked for those wishing to
speak in opposition to the request to come
forward. There being none, he closed the
public hearing.
Mr. Skinner asked Mr. LeBaron if there was
any correspondence concerning this case.
Mr. LeBaron stated there was no
correspondence.
ZBA Minutes, page 7
April 16, 1992
Mr. Skinner stated that this was a great
opportunity to take away an eyesore, and
that there was great understanding between
all parties concerned.
Mr. Skinner made the motion to approve Ba
92-06 as stated. Mr. Cypert seconded the
motion, and the motion carried 4-0.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the
meeting was adjourned.
~~:::::n