HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA 1989-09-21 Minutes
.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
SEPTEMBER 21, 1989 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the
Vice Chairman, Forrest Grubb, at 7:30
P.M.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Vice Chairman
Secretary
Members
Chief Bldg. Inspector
P & Z Coordinator
Forrest Grubb
Harold Schubert
Billy Cypert
Jeff Bunting
Bob Williams
Wanda Calvert
ABSENT:
Ron Hubbard
Tom Duer
Jim Kemp
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF AUGUST 17, 1989
Mr. Schubert made the motion to
approve the minutes as written. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Cypert and
the motion carried 3-0 with Mr Bunting
abstaining since he was not present at
the meeting.
.
1.
BA 89-21
Request of J.M. Norton to vary from
the Zoning Ordinance 81080 on Lot 46R,
Block 3, Meadow Lakes Addition, to
allow the construction of a wrought
iron fence beyond the front and side
building line, and to vary from the
Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
#1471 to allow an encroachment into
the Flood Plain. This property is
located at 4904 Skylark Circle.
Vice Chairman Grubb opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of these requests to
please come forward.
.
Mr. Norton came forward. He stated he
bought a lot on the lake and was given
a small narrow strip of land adjoining
this lot. He stated the City Golf
Course people are allowing him to put
in a waterfall and he needs to put up
a fence. Mr. Norton said he plans to
make a little park area there.
Page 2
Z B A Minutes
September 21, 1989
.
Mr. Schubert asked if there would be
any buildings on this small area.
Mr. Norton said he may put a gazebo.
Bob Frank, 6533 Meadow Lakes Drive,
came forward. He said he is in favor
of the fence going to the property
line.
Vice Chairman Grubb stated Mr. Norton
also is asking for a variance due to
an encroachment into the Flood Plain.
.
Mr. Williams stated that Mr. Norton
came in and took out a permit for a
retaining wall. He said the old wall
had deteriorated and the one he built
is a big improvement, but instead of
building it on the property line, it
went into the lake. Mr. Williams said
when it goes into the lake, it needs
to be checked by Texas Water
Commission and the Public Works
Department; however, we have a letter
from Public Works which states
everything is okay, but needs to
release the city of any
responsibility.
Mr. Norton stated the wall ~roke and
they almost lost it. He said they put
steel in it and it is built well. He
said this was done during the rainy
season and the wall is off the
property line some.
Mrs. Calvert stated the permit for the
wall is not an issue tonight.
.
Mr. Ragsdale, 4901 Dory Court, came
forward. He said he lives next door
to where Mr. Norton is building his
house. He said he is very proud to
have Mr. Norton build there. Mr.
Ragsdale said everything Mr. Norton is
doing is an enhancement to the area.
He said he has people come through his
yard to get to the lake to fish and
this fence will stop that.
Page 3
Z B A Minutes
September 21, 1989
.
Vice Chairman Grubb called for anyone
wishing to speak in opposition to
these requests to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Vice Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
BA 89-21
APPROVED
Mr. Schubert made the motion to
approve BA 89-21 as requested on both
requests. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bunting and the motion carried
4-0.
2.
BA 89-22
Request of Ken A. Broadie to vary from
the Zoning Ordinance #1080 on Lot 40,
Block 1, Diamond Loch Addition, to be
allowed to build a breakfast room
beyond the side building line. This
property is located at 3801 Diamond
Loch West.
.
Vice Chairman Grubb opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. Broadie came forward. He stated
he wishes to add a breakfast room on
to his existing kitchen. He said it
would be 35~ feet from the street. He
said he wants to go out 9~ feet with a
glass room. Mr. Broadie stated he is
remodeling the kitchen and adding on
to the back of the house. He said the
extension would be 16~ feet from the
property line.
Mr. Schubert asked if the measurements
are to the vertical wall and would he
have an 18 inch overhang.
Mr. Broadie said he believed it would
have an overhang. He said he hadn't
got that far yet.
.
Vice Chairman Grubb asked if this
addition would be brick.
Page 4
Z B A Minutes
September 21, 1989
.
Mr. Broadie stated it would be glass
with brick in between. He said it
would look nice.
Mr. Bunting said the extension would
be toward the side street and he sees
no problem with it.
Mr. Broadie said he needed the
addition because it will be the only
place for his family to eat. He said
the extension would not block the view
of traffic.
Vice Chairman Grubb called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Vice Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
.
Vice Chairman Grubb asked if there had
been any correspondence.
Mrs. Calvert stated there had been
none.
BA 89-22
APPROVED
Mr. Cypert made the motion to approve
BA 89-22 as requested. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Bunting and the
motion carried 4-0.
3.
BA 89-23
Request of Robert A. Egert with North
Hills Mall to vary from the Zoning
Ordinance 81080 to allow design
banners approximately 3 ft. by 12 ft.
to be displayed from the light poles
on the exterior of their property.
This property is located at 7624
Grapevine Highway.
Vice Chairman Grubb opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
.
Page 5
Z B A Minutes
September 21, 1989
·
Scott Nelson, 7624 Grapevine Hwy.,
came forward to represent Mr. Egert
and the Mall. He stated they want to
improve the property. He said they
have a landscaping program. Mr.
Nelson stated these banners would be
affixed to the light poles. He said
they would add color and style to the
area. He said they would also
recognize where a person parked his
car. Mr. Nelson said he works in
Security and people requests their
services in finding where they are
parked. Mr. Nelson stated these
banners would not be the type as seen
on carlots and grocery stores.
Mr. Bunting asked if they plan to
change them from time to time.
·
Mr. Nelson stated they are so costly,
he was not sure. He said they might
change the color. He said they want
them to look professional, not have a
cheap look.
Mr. Schubert asked if the design would
include a name or wording.
Mr. Nelson stated they would not.
Mr. Bunting asked if they do not plan
to change them from time to time, how
could they keep them looking nice.
Mr. Nelson said they would change them
if they become frayed.
Mr. Schubert asked why the size 3 by
12 feet.
Mr. Nelson said it had been
recommended best for the overall view.
Mr. Schubert asked if they could be
seen from both sides.
·
Mr. Nelson said they could.
Mr. Bunting asked about the two
pictures that were submitted.
Page 6
Z B A Minutes
September 21, 1989
.
Mr. Nelson stated they were taken at
two different locations for examples.
Mr. Bunting asked if they had a plan
for the height.
Mr. Nelson said they do not know how
high they will be.
Mr. Schubert asked if there was a
minimum height.
Mr. Williams said 8 feet.
Mr. Schubert asked if the design would
be political or religious.
Mr. Nelson said it would basically be
a design and color.
.
Mr. Schubert asked Mr. Nelson if he
was aware of the ordinance regarding
banners.
Mr. Nelson said he was. He said they
just want to enhance their property.
Mr. Schubert said he appreciated that,
but the Board does not want to be
known as a city out of control. He
said they do not want to be lax on the
ordinance.
Mr. Nelson said they do not want it to
look like a used car lot or a grocery
store. He said they are wanting to
beautify the property.
Mr. Bunting stated he thinks they
would be an eye-catcher.
Mr. Nelson stated they hope they will
cause an increase in sales.
.
Mr. Schubert said since there are only
four present on the Board tonight and
it takes four affirmative votes to
pass a request, he feels they might
need to table this request to a later
date.
Page 7
Z B A Minutes
September 21, 1989
.
Mr. Cypert stated this could cause a
number of banners in the city. He
said it was the majority of the vote
of the ones who wrote and approved the
ordinance that they did not want
banners and if the Board approves
these for North Hills Mall, then a
trend could be set. He said if it is
the current feeling of the staff to
have these banners, maybe they need to
change the ordinance. Mr. Cypert said
he could see some advantages and some
disadvantages.
Mr. Bunting said they need an
interpretation of the ordinance.
Mr. Nelson stated it was the Board's
responsibility to hear the variance.
.
Mr. Cypert said maybe they need to
change the ordinance. He said the
Board has to answer five questions:
1) What is unique about this property
such that strict compliance with the
Zoning Ordinance would result in
unusual hardship or render the
property unusable for its permitted
use? 2) Has the applicant created his
own hardship situation and would a
prudent person have forseen the
hardship? 3) Could the applicant
reasonably achieve his purpose by
applying for rezoning rather than the
variance? 4) Is the spirit of the
ordinance being complied with and is
justice being substantially served?
5) Will the requested variance, if
granted, cause problems for adjoining
property? Mr. Cypert stated that if
the Board grants one, others would say
you allowed them to have banners, so
let us.
.
Mr. Nelson said there is a hardship.
He said they are trying to increase
sales for the city. He said they
attract customers to their center
through various means. Mr. Nelson
said they want to keep customers and
attract more. He said they want to
make their mall more professional and
attractive.
Page 8
Z B A Minutes
September 21, 1989
.
Mr. Bunting said the ordinance does
not address these type of signs. He
said it speaks of banners like "Mr.
Jim's" or a dry cleaning sign.
Mr. Cypert said if that is the case,
have the staff review it and ask us
for an interpretation.
Mr. Bunting said he felt this is a
grey area of the ordinance.
Vice Chairman Grubb said he felt they
should table it and talk with the City
Staff.
.
Mr. Schubert stated there are five
items listed under "banner signs". He
asked which one is he in violation to.
Re said the ordinance reads "Banner
Signs may be attached to a wall
surface-Dr facia and shall not project
above the apparent roof or eave line."
Mr. Schubert said it does not say
"shall", it says "may".
Mr. Bunting said the ordinance also
states one sign per business.
Mr. Nelson said they could put one for
each store in the mall.
Mr. Schubert asked how many banners
they plan to put up.
Mr. Nelson said there would be two
banners per light pole; one on each
side (one piece on each side). He
said it is one banner, but two pieces
of material so it can be seen on both
sides.
Vice Chairman Grubb said the Board
needs to postpone this until the next
meeting.
.
Mr. Cypert said it may be an
interpretation problem, but it is
better to address the problem. He
said if it is interpretation, you would
not have to present this case.
·
·
·
Page 9
Z B A Minutes
September 21, 1989
BA 89-23
TABLED
ADJOURNMENT
~M -
Secretary
Zoning Board of Adjustment
Mr. Nelson asked what if he comes back
next month and there is still only
four on the Board again.
Mr. Cypert said they are only citizens
of North Richland Hills giving of
their time to serve on this Board. He
said there are times they cannot come.
Vice Chairman Grubb said we are proud
of North Hills Mall and the Board
wants to do the right thing.
Mr. Bunting said this is a grey area.
Mr. Cypert made the motion to table
BA 89-23 until the next regularly
scheduled meeting and also ask the
City Staff if there is a violation of
the ordinance. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Schubert and the
motion carried 4-0.
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
~.
Adjustment