HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ 1987-08-13 Minutes
.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
AUGUST 13, 1987 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the
Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Secretary
Members
Don Bowen
John Schwinger
Mark Wood
Carole Flippo
George Tucker
Richard Royston
Wanda Calvert
Alt. Member
Dir. Planning/Dev.
P & Z Coordinator
ABSENT:
Manny Tricoli
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF JUNE 25, 1987
Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the
motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Wood and
Mr. Tucker abstaining since they were
not present at the meeting.
.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF JULY 9, 1987
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the
motion carried 3-0 with Ms. Flippo and
Mr. Tucker abstaining since they were
not present at the meeting.
1.
PS 87-12
Request of Lamar Savings Association
and Tecnol Company for replat of
Tracts 4, 5, & 6, N.R.H. Industrial
Park Addition.
PS 87-12
APPROVED
Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve
PS 87-12 with the stipulation that no
more replats will be granted until
such time they have signed agreement
with the railroad. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion
carried 5-0.
.
Page 2
p & Z Minutes
August 13, 1987
.
2.
PS 87-28
Request of Rufe Snow Village
Partnership and The Kroger Company for
replat of Lots 2R thru 5R & 6, Block
1, Northland Shopping Center Addition.
PS 87-28
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 87-28. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
5-0.
3.
PZ 87-14
Request of Ike Harris & Company to
rezone Tract 16E, W.W. Wallace Survey,
Abstract 1606, from its present
classification of R-3 Single Family to
R-8 Single Family Detached Zero Lot
Line. This property is located south
of Emerald Hills Way and west of
Grapevine Highway.
.
Chairman Bowen opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Attorney George Staples came forward
to represent the applicant. He stated
there is 18 plus acres which lies
south of Emerald Hills Way. He said
the Master Plan shows two
thoroughfares, one at the top and one
at the bottom of this property. Mr.
Staples stated that part of this
property is in the flood plain and
there would have to be some extensive
channel work done. He said they plan
to put a concrete channel to the south
and west.
Mr. Staples stated the ''Windsor Park"
development is owned by his client and
this development will be similar to
it. He said they are asking for R-8
zoning for the lot size.
.
Mr. Staples stated the City will
participate in building the channel
since the property is adjacent to a
City Park. He said it would cost the
developer $60,000 for the concrete
channel without the bridge and the
only way they could see any return
would be to have this zoning.
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
August 13, 1987
.
Mr. Staples stated there is an
elementary school across the street
from this property; there are 5 houses
that back up to the channel, but there
are no houses immediately adjacent to
this property. He said he felt this
would be compatible to the
neighborhood. He said the lots would
be from 4100 to 5000 square feet.
Mr. Staples showed the Commission
pictures of development ín the area.
He also showed them pictures of the
Windsor Park development.
Mr. Staples stated he had others
present who would be able to answer
any questions the Commission might
have.
Chairman Bowen asked what the minimum
house size would be.
.
Mr. Staples stated they would probably
be from 1200 to 1400 square feet. He
said they don't have a firm figure on
that yet.
Chairman Bowen called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
Carl Ball, 5512 Irish Spring Lane,
came forward. He said he had not been
able to see the site plan. He said
part of the channel is in his back
yard and he wondered how much he would
be assessed for it.
Mr. Royston stated there is no
assessment for drainage.
Mr. Ball asked if they plan to build
two story houses. He said he was sure
they would since the lots are so
small. He said he knew they could
build two story houses in R-3 zoning.
.
Mr. Tucker said most of them would be
two story.
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
August 13, 1987
.
Mr. Ball stated if this zoning is
approved, he would request the houses
be 1200 to 1400 square feet.
Chairman Bowen stated the minimum for
R-8 is 1200 square feet.
.
Larry Telford, 5517 Irish Springs
Lane, came forward. He said when the
multi-family came in, they made more
traffic. He said there is no light at
Grapevine Highway, but they put one in
on Davis Boulevard. Mr. Telford said
there is a school right across the
street from this property and this
would cause increased traffic. He
said to the east there is the largest
tract of R-7-MF in the City of North
Richland Hills; to the north is
Industrial; to the east and west is
commercial; then the Northeast Campus;
and a park to the south.
Mr. Telford said when he moved there,
he was proud of the R-3. He said he
felt it was better for the
neighborhood. Mr. Telford said if
this request is approved, he would
like to see the houses 1300 square
feet.
Ms. Flippo asked Mr. Staples what the
difference would be in the cost of the
streets and drainage for R-3 and R-8.
Mr. Staples stated the drainage and
street cost would still be required in
R-3.
Chairman Bowen closed the Public
Hearing.
PZ 87-14
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PZ 87-14. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-1
with Mr. Schwinger voting against.
.
Chairman Bowen stated this is only a
recommendation to the City Council and
they have the right to speak at their
meeting which will be September 14th.
Page 5
P & Z Minutes
August 13, 1987
.
4.
PZ 87-15
Request of Richmond Bay Development
Company to rezone a portion of Tract
2, W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520,
from its present classifications of OC
Outdoor Commercial and R-2 Single
Family to R-2 and ac. This property
is located south of Meadow Lakes Drive
and west of Dory Court.
Chairman Bowen opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Bob Frank came forward to represent
the applicant. He said they want to
change a small amount of OC Outdoor
Commercial to R-2 lots. He said he
did not feel this would interfere with
the golf course.
.
Chairman Bowen called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
PZ 87-15
APPROVED
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PZ 87-15 with the stipulation
that the lots be 10,400 square feet
and the houses be 2,000 square feet.
This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo
and the motion carried 5-0.
5.
PS 87-25
Consideration of an amendment to the
Subdivision Ordinance #195 regarding
Park Land Dedication.
Chairman Bowen opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak to please come forward.
.
Bill Pasteur, 1900 Trailwood, Euless,
came forward. He said he was a
Commercial and Residential Investment
Realtor. He said his partner, Walter
Elliott, is also present.
Page 6
P & Z Minutes
August 13, 1987
.
Mr. Pasteur stated they have two
subdivisions being developed in North
Richland Hills at present; Century
Oaks at Starnes and Smithfield Road
and Spring Meadows across from
Smithfield Elementary School. He said
they have also helped in the
development of Stonybrooke.
.
Mr. Pasteur thanked the Commission for
holding a Public Hearing on this
matter. He said he did not wish to
debate, but would like to point out
some things. He said page 1,
paragraph 1, this fee is charged only
on residential property; none would be
charged on commercial, office
districts, etc. He said only the new
resident in North Richland Hills would
have to pay. Mr. Pasteur said this is
a tax on the developer which would in
turn pass on to the new resident so
the new resident will have to pay for
the parks that all citizens will use.
Mr. Pasteur said page 2, paragraphs 4
& 5, the developer would go through
the city process of platting a piece
of property only to have the City
Council veto it. He said that would
be very expensive and time consuming
for the developer; paragraphs 6 & 7,
the $225 per dwelling unit could go
higher; it could be changed by the
City Council. He said this makes for
an unworkable situation for the
developer.
Mr. Wood said paragraph 6 states it
would be limited to $225.
Mr. Royston stated the intent would be
to reimburse the City from the fund.
He said the City Council decides on
all fees.
.
Chairman Bowen said the fee would not
be changed in the middle of the
stream.
Mr. Tucker said it would be changed by
an amendment of the ordinance.
Page 7
p & Z Minutes
August 13, 1987
.
Mr. Tucker asked Mr. Royston how could
the platting process be done.
Mr. Royston stated the decision should
be at the time of preliminary
platting.
Mr. Tucker said the engineering would
be expensive if they had to start over
if the council did not like it.
Mr. Royston said it should be decided
prior to the final plat being
submitted.
.
Mr. Pasteur said on page 2, paragraph
8 it speaks of refunds. He said there
is never any refunds; page 3,
paragraph 9, is contradictory. Mr.
Pasteur said the flood plain is the
most desirable for a park, Colonial
Country Club is in the 100 year flood
plain and Euless has a beautiful park
in the flood plain. Mr. Pasteur said
112-"any areas of unusual topography or
slope which renders the property
unusable for organized recreational
activities", channelization is a major
expense for a park.
Paragraph 10, the developer would be
confused, there would be 3 bodies
reviewing the plat. There would be
long, lag time. He said it takes a
minimum of 15 to 18 months to develop
a piece of property from the zoning to
the development.
.
Mr. Pasteur stated that parks are for
the common good to all people, but
with this ordinance only the new
residents would pay; residential
development would subsidize for
everyone. He said he thinks this is
very unfair. He said the builders and
developers have to be competitive.
Mr. Pasteur said that North Richland
Hills has increased the building
permits 400%. He said the developers
and builders are in the worst shape in
many years and they have to be
speculative and it puts the burden on
them.
Page 8
p & Z Minutes
August 13, 1987
.
Mr. Pasteur said he was aware there is
a need for parks in North Richland
Hills. He said the city would have to
set up a new accounting system for the
fees and refunds. Mr. Pasteur said
this is an excellent chance to
challenge it in court.
Mr. Pasteur said he read in the paper
of the additional fees being proposed
for sewage and water for North
Richland Hills.
Mr. Pasteur said the developers are
concerned about this ordinance.
.
Doug Long, part owner of B. H. & L,
came forward. He said they own some
land in area 5. He said they have a
substantial park there. He asked if
they need more park in that area. Mr.
Long said he felt everything would be
a cash donation. He asked how much
land does the city need for parks.
Mr. Royston said the Park Master Plan
said 40 more acres of park land is
needed, but did not say where they
might need to upgrade the present
park.
Mr. Long said if they have sufficient
park land in the area, what then? He
said he was not sure he understood
paragraph 6, page 2.
Chairman Bowen said if no further land
is required, then the $225 per unit
would be charged.
Mr. Royston stated that if the city
purchases land for a park, they would
need to be reimbursed, it would go
back to a land fund requirement.
.
Mr. Long asked if that park is totally
developed, he cannot give land, he has
to pay cash?
Page 9
p & Z Minutes
August 13, 1987
.
Mr. Tucker stated it is the intent of
the ordinance for all residential
developers to participate.
Mr. Royston stated that if the cash is
not needed it would be returned after
two years.
Mr. Long stated they have Little Bear
Creek on their property and in certain
areas they will have to improve it,
but it might be to the city's
advantage not to have it concrete
lined. He said the Commission would
have the right to vary from this.
Mr. Long requested the Commission have
another hearing to discuss this
ordinance.
.
Chairman Bowen called for anyone else
wishing to speak to please come
forward.
There being no one else wishing to
speak, the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood said he appreciated the time
and effort of these developers. He
said he felt the Commission needs to
go back and take another look at this
ordinance.
Mr. Tucker said the developers brought
up some good points
Chairman Bowen stated he does not feel
the Commission is ready to recommend
approval of this ordinance. He said
the Commission will continue this
for more study on the first meeting in
September, September 10th.
ADJOURNMENT
.