HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA 1986-10-16 Minutes
~
.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
OCTOBER 16, 1986 - 7:00 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the
Chairman, Jack Roseberry at 7:05 P.M.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Members
Jack Roseberry
Harold Schubert
Hans Kossler
Ron Hubbard
Forrest Grubb
David Barfield
Rex McEntire
Richard Royston
Greg Wheeler
Wanda Calvert
Alt. Members
City Attorney
Dir. Planning/Dev.
Building Official
P & Z Coordinator
ABSENT:
Billy Cypert
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF MAY 15, 1986
Chairman Roseberry stated that on Page
5, ninth paragraph, should read:
"Chairman Roseberry said if the Board
granted this variance, Mr. and Mrs.
Harding could still be open for a suit
on deed restrictions."
.
Mr. Grubb made the motion to approve
the minutes with this correction.
This motion was seconded by Mr.
Schubert and the motion carried 3-0
with Mr. Hubbard and Mr. Kossler
abstaining since they were not present
at the meeting.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF JUNE 19, 1986
Mr. Schubert made the motion to
approve the minutes as written. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Hubbard and
the motion carried 4-0 with Mr.
Kossler and Mr. Grubb abstaining since
they were not present at the meeting.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF JULY 17, 1986
Mr. Grubb made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Hubbard and the
motion carried 4-0 with Mr. Schubert
and Mr. Kossler abstaining since they
were not present at this meeting.
.
~
Page 2
Z B A Minutes
October 16, 1986
.
1.
BA 86-12
Request of Quinten's Crossing Joint
Venture to vary from the Zoning
Ordinance #1080 on Lot 1, Block 12,
Snow Heights North Addition, to be
allowed to install a 6 foot wood fence
instead of a masonry fence. This
property is located at 6901 Northeast
Loop 820.
Chairman Roseberry opened the Public
Hearing and called for the
representative to come forward.
.
Ken Curry, Attorney, came forward. He
stated he is here to request
consideration in this request and that
the code be enforced. Mr. Curry
stated they filed an application to
build a wood fence and was turned
down. He stated the property was
rezoned in 1983, Ordinance #1012 which
stated it required a sight barring
fence on the north and east side of
the property. Mr. Curry stated that
the definition of a sight barring
fence is either wood or masonry. He
said they were told by the city that
if they did not comply, the city would
have TESCO pull their power.
Mr. Curry said there is a big
difference in the cost of the fences.
He said the wood fence would cost
approximately $7,000, but the masonry
fence would cost approximately
$60,000. Mr. Curry stated the
apartment complex is a credit to the
city and he could not explain why the
city is requiring a masonry fence. He
said the west side of the project
already has a wooden fence; on the
north is the TESCO easement and Lewis
Drive and on the east is Birdville
Independent School District.
.
Chairman Roseberry asked Mr. Curry if
he was aware that the Planned
Development zoning was approved for a
masonry fence.
.
.
.
~
Page 3
Z B A Minutes
October 16, 1986
Mr. Curry stated he has the minutes of
the meetings where a masonry fence was
discussed, but on March 28th the
zoning was approved with the
stipulation that a sight barring fence
be constructed.
Mr. Grubb stated he believes they
intended the fence to be masonry.
Mr. Curry stated his clients reviewed
the ordinance, not the tapes of the
meetings.
Mr. Grubb asked if he thought it is
their clients responsibility to carry
out the requirements of the Planned
Development.
Mr. Curry said his clients believe the
sight barring fence could be a wood
fence; this is an exception.
Mr. Grubb stated this masonry fence
requirement was in the zoning; why is
it an exception. He asked Mr. Curry
shouldn't his client assume the total
responsibility of the ordinance.
Mr. Curry stated his client agreed to
the zoning ordinance of the city.
Mr. Grubb stated it was a Planned
Development and you have to accept all
the requirements.
Mr. Curry asked the Board to over rule
the City Staff.
Rex McEntire, City Attorney, came
forward. He said this basically
requires an interpretation from the
Board because they disagree with the
City Building Official.
Chairman Roseberry said the minutes
show it was approved with a masonry
fence. He said it is not hard to
understand.
~
Page 4
Z B A Minutes
October 16, 1986
.
Mr. Curry stated the City Council
approved it with a sight barring
fence.
Chairman Roseberry asked Mr. Curry if
he agreed that the Zoning Board
approved it with a masonry fence.
Mr. Curry said he was not at the
meeting, but the minutes state a
masonry fence was stipulated.
Mr. McEntire stated the recommendation
of the Zoning Board comes as a
recommendation to the City Council.
He said this was a Planned Development
with no fence, but the Zoning Board
stipulated a masonry fence.
Chairman Roseberry asked if there is a
fence there.
.
Greg Wheeler, City Building Official,
came forward. He said there is not a
fence there. Mr. Wheeler stated
Chasewood requested a permit for a
wood fence on August 27,1986, but was
disapproved because the requirement
was for a masonry fence to be erected
on the north and east sides of the '
property. He said this was Ordinance
#1012. Mr. Wheeler said the ordinance
stipulated a "site" barring fence
instead of a "sight" barring fence,
sight was misspelled. Mr. Wheeler
stated everyone wanted to know when
Chasewood was going to put up the
masonry fence, so Mr. Wheeler wrote
Chasewood a letter.
Chairman Roseberry said then Chasewood
came back before the Zoning Board in
May, 1986.
.
Mr. Royston stated that was correct.
He said the Planning and Zoning
Commission rejected a request to amend
the Planned Development Site Plan.
~
Page 5
Z B A Minutes
October 16, 1986
.
Chairman Roseberry asked Mr. Curry why
his client did not go back to the City
Council.
Mr. Curry said his client tried hard
to work with the city to resolve the
problem. He said his client feels it
was a wrong decision of the City Staff
for the requirement of a masonry
fence.
Chairman Roseberry asked Mr. Curry if
his client felt the City Council did
not intend it to be a masonry fence.
Mr. Curry stated that his client was
not aware that a masonry fence was a
requirement.
Mr. Grubb asked why they did not apply
for a fence permit when the apartments
were finished.
.
Mr. Curry said he did not know.
Mr. Grubb stated he hoped the City
Staff has changed their policy and
would require all requirements before
the completion of the apartments.
Mr. Grubb asked why Mr. Curry's client
did not go back to the City Council
for clarification.
.
Tom Michaels, Vice President of
Trammel Crow and Chasewood
Construction Company, came forward.
He said he was project manager at the
time and was not connected with the
zoning. Mr. Michaels stated they
contracted to buy the property
contingent on obtaining the zoning.
He said Mr. Cook handled the zoning
request and he presented us with a
copy of the ordinance. Mr. Michaels
said the President of the company
looked over the ordinance which had
the requirement of a site barring
fence so we bought the property.
~
Page 6
Z B A Minutes
October 16, 1986
.
Mr. Michaels stated not putting up the
fence was an oversight of his company
and the city. He said this problem
had been going on for a year and a
half. He said they wanted to go
before the Zoning Board of Adjustment,
but the City Council said to go to the
Planning and Zoning Commission. He
said the Planning and Zoning
Commission had no discussion, he was
bombarded by persons on each side.
Mr. Michaels said why go to the City
Council because the decision had
already been made. He said their
ultimatum came in the form of a letter
stating they planned to pull the
electricity.
.
Mr. Michaels said he is here to try to
work out a solution. He said the
ordinance stated a site barring fence
which by definition means either wood
or masonry. He said there is such a
difference in the cost of the fence.
He said a masonry fence would cost
from $60,000 to $130,000, but a wood
fence would be about $7,000. Mr.
Michaels said Quinten's Crossing is an
asset to the city and us.
Chairman Roseberry said he remembers
the zoning was controversial at the
time.
Mr. Grubb asked what if the wood fence
falls down in three years.
Mr. Michaels stated Chasewood would be
responsible to replace it. Mr.
Michaels said he went to the BISD and
talked with Mr. Fox who stated he was
afraid a masonry fence would be hit by
vandals.
.
Mr. Wheeler stated his interpretation
of Ordinance #1012 was for a masonry
fence. He gave a copy of a memo to
the Chairman. He researched the
minutes of P & Z and City Council.
.
.
.
~
Page 7
Z B A Minutes
October 16, 1986
Mr. Wheeler asked if the Board had
copies of the minutes.
Chairman Roseberry stated they had
copies.
Chairman Roseberry asked if the P & Z
and City Council were held on the same
day.
Mr. Royston stated they were. He
stated that Ordinance #1012
superceded Ordinance #1080; Ordinance
#1080 was not in effect at the time.
He said we were working under
Ordinance #179 at that time.
Mr. Curry stated his client is against
the decision of the City Staff. He
said they need a compromise. He said
they have a problem with the
tremendous cost involved.
Mr. Grubb stated the decision was made
that a wood fence was out and a
masonry fence in.
Mr. Curry stated his client does not
feel that was the decision of the City
Council.
Mr. Grubb asked Mr. Curry if he wanted
an exception to the ordinance.
Mr. Curry stated he was not asking for
an exception, he needs to know the
ruling of the City Council.
Chairman Roseberry read from Vernon's
Civil Statutes regarding the Zoning
Board of Adjustment. He said the ZBA
has the right to modify or to change.
Mr. Curry said they would agree to
putting brick columns.
Mr. Wheeler said if the Board desires
to modify or stipulate something, he
would try to carry it out.
.
.
.
~
Page 8
Z B A Minutes
October 16, 1986
Mr. McEntire said the Board could
postpone the request, they do not have
to make a decision at this time.
Mr. Kossler said he would propose to
make a modification. He said he felt
a masonry fence would soon have cracks
in it. Mr. Kossler said he was at the
meeting and remembered the developer
gave BISD some land.
Chairman Roseberry asked how much
land.
Mr. Michaels said the developer gave
the school 5 acres and the school
bought 5 acres.
Mr. Hubbard stated the Board is
getting away from the intent of
putting up a masonry fence. He said
it was to be put up for the tenants
and the school.
Chairman Roseberry said he felt
Chasewood has built a nice project as
well as giving the land to the school.
RECESS
Chairman Roseberry called a recess at
8:08 P. M.
BACK TO ORDER
Chairman Roseberry called the meeting
back to order at 8:15 P. M. with the
same members present.
Mr. Kossler made a motion to have the
City Staff compromise and work with
Chasewood in putting up a continuous
footing with brick columns and panels
of cedar and redwood. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Grubb.
Mr. Barfield said something should be
said about how far apart the columns
would be.
Mr. Kossler said he would amend his
motion to add that the columns be 8 to
10 feet apart.
.
.
.
Page 9
Z B A Minutes
October 16, 1986
This motion was seconded by Mr. Grubb.
The motion to amend carried 4-1 with
Mr. Hubbard voting against.
Mr. Michaels asked if they would allow
them to put the masonry columns 16
feet apart with treated posts.
Mr. Grubb asked what if the posts gets
broken.
Mr. Michaels said they would replace
them.
Mr. Kossler said he had rather have
metal posts.
Mr. Kossler amended his motion to
require the brick columns on 16 foot
centers with metal posts in between
and the size of the posts to be
decided by the City Staff. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Grubb and
the motion carried 4-1 with Mr.
Hubbard voting against.
Chairman Roseberry asked the City
Staff to work with Chasewood and
report back to the Board at the next
meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P. M.
& Zoning Commission