Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ 1980-04-24 Minutes . . . l CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF MARCH 27, 1980 NEW BUSII~ESS PZ 80-14 APPROVED MI~mTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AìID ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, APRIL 24, 1980 The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Mary Jo Shaunty, at 7:35 P.M. PRESENT: CHAIRMAN SECRETARY MEMBERS Mary Jo Shaunty Warren Eckhardt Jack Knowles Marjorie Nash MEMBER ABSENT: Carl Greenfield CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gary Caldwell Wanda Calvert Desi Smyth Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Knowles, to approve the minutes as written. Motion carried 4-0. Request of the City of North Richland Hills to rezone Tracts lA, lAl, & 2F, Abstract 1606, from its present classification of Multi-Family and Local Retail to a proposed classification of IF-9-l5-0ne Family Dwellings. This property is located north of the TESCO R.O.W. and bounded by Holiday Lane on the west, North Richland Blvd. on the north, and Holiday North Addition on the east. Mr. Caldwell stated that due to a directive from the City Council, the City is requesting this zoning change from Multi-Family and Local Retail to IF-9-l5-Single Family Residences. The Chairman asked for people who wished to speak in favor of this request. Mrs. Nancy Strauser, 7525 Circle Drive, stated she represented the property owners in Holiday North Addition. She said that at the time this property was zoned, the area north, east and south was zoned single family. Mrs. Strauser stated the Comprehensive Plan for the City of North Richland Hills showed the area to be . . . l Page 2 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 1 developed as low density residential except for the area adjacent to Calloway Branch which was to be developed as semi public open space. Mrs. Strauser said the rezoning took place in 1969, and much has changed since that time. Mrs. Strauser said it was set out in Article 1011A of Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes and many other references and legal documents that a City Council either on its own motion or a petition from the property owners may rezone property. Mrs. Strauser said the density of the housing to be built cannot be considered wfuthout considering the streets and utility systems that serve it. She stated that on page 8 of the Zoning Ordinance states: "It is anticipated that additional areas may be designated in the Multi-Family District from time to time in the future where such change is appropriate and access and utility services can reasonable accommodate the in- creased density. These districts should be located in close proximity to major thorough- fares and preferably adjoin business zoned property." Mrs. Strauser also stated that on page 9, concerning Local Retail: "These areas should primarily be located at the intersection of major thoroughfares." She said the nearest major thoroughfare is Davis Blvd. and Rufe Snow; both being more than a ~ mile away. Mrs. Strauser stated that Holiday Lane, Nor East and North Richland Blvd. are shown as being secondary thorough- fares. She said that Holiday Lane was built less than two inches thick and is now break- ing up badly as a result of construction and heavy equipment traveling on it. Mrs. Strauser stated that when it opens up to Watauga Road, with the added traffic, we will have a lot of street repair problems. She also said that Nor East was eliminated as a thoroughfare when the school district bought their property for a sports field, and North Richland Blvd. is already abused by traffic and it is next to impossible at certain times of the day to travel on. Mrs. Strauser said that this is what would happen to Circle Drive if allowed to be open. She said they already have cars making the corner on two wheels and barely escape running into the yards now; if this is open, it would make this an open invitation . . . ~ Page 3 p & Z Minuteþ April 24, 19$0 1 for people to speed through our street. Mrs. Strauser said their streets are only residential width (30 ft.). Mrs. Strauser stated that if the City had been intent upon building this area as Multi-Family, why weren't the necessary re- quirements met before now, before they bought their homes so they would have been aware of what was going to be there. She said they were told that because of the flood plain, nothing would be built there. She said they should bè able to rely on the city's judgement. Mrs. Strauser said that if the Multi-Family is allowed, we could have 1,000 additional cars down these streets from only 400 units. The same would be true for Holiday Lane. She said they were talking about 50 acres of Multi-Family, 1000 housing units, 2500 cars that would empty out onto two streets that would overload tremendously. Mrs. Strauser said that "Phase" development of this land could be disasterous; they could develop the prime land first and leave the problem land till last. She said the homeowners are afraid the first phase or even phase two would be developed and then the rest of the land would be sold off and not conform with the rest of the land. Mrs. Strauser said that it is easy for a developer to say what he will do, but what really happens sometimes is different; the developer may have every intention of abiding by his plat, but circumstances do change. Mrs. Strauser said they feel that the type of structure, stucco and redwood, is out of character for the neighborhood since many of the homes in the meignborhood have had quite extensive remodeling. Mrs. Strauser said they were very concerned about the Flood Plain. She said they have had rains in the past that came up in their ya~ds. She said they have had rains that made driving on Holiday Lane impossiblec Mrs. Strauser said they feel that the addition of so much concrete and buildings, the runoff would not only endanger the homeowners, but the people further on downstream. She said this is a city-wide problem when we talk about th'Ísas b:eingin the flood plain. Page 4 p & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 1 . Mrs. Strauser said the city's sewer system is strained as it is because in the summer, they have very poor sewage and although the problem with water should be eliminated, they always have had poor water pressure. Mrs. Strauser said everyone is aware of the problems of crime around apartments. She said she has talked to several police and their feelings are the same. Mrs. Strauser said that this past fall, their elementary school was divided, making a confortable number of students; Richland High is expected to expand even more, allowing for 600 more students. She said all d>f tltiis ¡, means more traffic burden during school hours. There are approximately 1100 cars at the high school daily now. . Mrs. Strauser said the city ±s not required by law, ethics, or morals, to maintain in- appropriate zoning on a tract of land simply to allow a developer, who does not live in this city, to make a few dollars at the home- owners expense. Mrs. Strauser said it is. not uncommon for developers to propose post- ponement of the high cost portion of the plat to allow more profit "up front", as they put it. Too many times, they take their pro~it and move on, which has happened before in this city, and will happen again. Mrs. Strauser asked the Commission to consider that the zoning of this to Multi-Family and Local Retail in 1969 was a violation of both the Comprehensive Master Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, and that changes made over the past eleven years have made it even less appropriate. She said the city council voted unanimously/ against the plat the first time; the court ruled against the amended plat; and the city council ruled, unanimously, to send it back to P & Z for the zoning change. . Mrs. Strauser said the concerned homeowners and the Mayor had made numerous attempts to communicate with Dal-Worth and were met with only negative results. She said the homeowners in no way want to cause the land owners"un- necessary loss, but feél as property owners . . . 1 Page 5 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 they also have rights to be considered. Mrs. Strauser said they have submitted to the city council signatures of 500 residents requesting this zoning change. Mrs. Strauser asked the Commission to take into consideration the matter of safety, health, and welfare, and to comply with the spirit of the Master Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, and correct the error made eleven years ago by granting the zoning request. Jim Anderson, living at q5817 ¡:Carolyn Drive and fobm~r Public Works Director at North Richland Hills, stated that they recognize' that in asking the Commission to rezone the subject property back to its original IF-9 classification, they are being critical of a decision made in 1969. He said they also recognize that it is easier to look back and detect errors than to see into the future. Mr. Anderson said that we are all blessed with 20/20 hindsight. He said the zoning of the subject tracts to Multi-Family was clearly a mistake in that it did not comply with the Comprehensive Plan, which shows the area was to be developed as low density residential, and the Zoning Ordinance, which indicates that Multi-Family should be in close proximity to major thoroughfares and abutt business zoned property. Mr. Anderson stated that subsequent zoning changes in the area, the development of Richland High School, and platting decisions which allowed Circle Drive to be narrowed to residential width, have further aggravated the situations. Mr. Anderson stated that approximately 50 acres involved in this zoning request could support close to lOa housing units and 2500: cars, which is an unacceptable load for Circle Drive and Holiday Lane. He said in addition to the heavy school traffic on Holiday Lane, much freeway traffic which would ordinarily exit on Grapevine Hwy., now uses Holiday Lane and North Richland Blvd. to get to Davis Blvd. to avoid the bottleneck at Davis and Grapevine Hwy. Mr. Anderson said IIoliday Lane was planned and built as a secondary road and not a major thoroughfare. . . . 1 Page 6 p & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 Mr. Anderson said the concerned homeowners were only asking that the Commission comply with the Comprehensive Plan and the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and return this property to its original zoning. Mr. Jesse Holmes, 5729 Carolyn Drive, stated he moved to College Hill Addition of the City of North Richland Hills in 1962 on Deaver Street. He said he was familiar with the promises the city has made and what they have done. Mr. Holmes stated that when they bought their home on Carolyn Drive, they were told that the property in question was in the flood zone. He said that water now comes across Holiday Lane, 'over the bridge railings, and down the street by where the "new city dump ground" is. Mr. Holmes stated that when he bought his home, it was a quite neighborhood, but it is far from it, now. He said that on the corner of Circle North and Holiday Lane, the street sign was knocked down and a 3-year old fruit tree was knocked down by the same car; what if there are 2500 more cars? Mr. Holmes asked the Commission to think of the safety of the children, the quite of the neighborhood, and the water problem in the area when it rains. Mrs. Shaunty asked Mr. Caldwell if he would check out about the dumping on Holiday Lane. Mr. Caldwell stated he would. Gerald Ottinger, 7520 Circle Drive, said he was approximately 250 feet from the boundary line of this property. He stated he was retired from the USAF since 1973 when he moved here. He said he was also told this property was Multi-Family but was in the flood zone and would never be developed. Mr. Knowles asked Mr. Ottinger who told him it was in the flood zone and would not be developed. . . . Page 7 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 1 Mr. Ottinger said the neighbors told him. Mrs. Strauser said the city told her. Keith Shuler, 5805 Carolyn Drive, said a sales representative of J. B. Sandlin told him. Carl Brooks, 5801 Carolyn Drive, said he was told by Mr. Sandlin that the Multi- Family zoning was in the flood plàin and never would be developed. Mr. Holmes said it was Mr. Sandlin who told him and that Mr. Sandlin was on the City Council at the time of the zoning change. John Taylor, 7441 North Richland Blvd., said he was told by the city, a representative of the City Manager, that there were no plans to develop this land since it was in the Flood Plain. He said he lives adjacent to North Richland Blvd. Mr. Taylor said that two times, cars have come across his yard and he has had to rebuild his mailbox. He said the traffic at 7:30 in the morining is very bad. Phil Anderson, 5900 Fieldstone, said the city came out and put up signs saying "curve" and also a 4-way stop sign at Susan Lee. He said they had a double dead-end street. Mr. Anderson said he called the city and asked why they put up the curve signs and the 4-way signs and he was told that they had run a count since they had so many accidents there that it merited the signs. The Chairman asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak in favor of this request. There were none. The Chairman asked for the ones who wanted to speak in opposition of this request. Mr. George Staples said he was the attorney for Dr. Penticost, who has approximately 38 acres which are being taken away from him. Mr. Staples asked if the Commission had the minutes from the City Council requesting this zoning change. . . . Page 8 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 1 Mrs. Calvert stated she did not have them with her, but they are available. Mr. Staples said he did not feel it was fair for the owners to have paid taxes all these years on Multi-Family property and then have it taken from them and the zoning changed. Mr. Staples stated he understands the home- oners' viewpoint, but it is not feasible nor profitable for his client to build single family or turn this property into a city park the way the homeowners want. Mr. Staples said if the zoning is changed, it would so 'devalue the land till it would have to be thrown into a junk heap. Mr. Staples stated that this property was included in approximately 500 acres that was planned as Holiday North in 1969. He said most of the acreage has been developed accord- ing to the plan that was set up in 1969 with roads going basically as they are now. Mr. Staples said Mr. Penticost's property was zoned from Agriculture to Multi-Family and Local Retail in 1969. Mr. Staples and Ernest Hedgcoth, Engineer, presented a study they made to determine if it was economically feasible to develop Mr. Penticost's property into single family IF-9. The plan showed 78 lots - 39 lots on the east side of the creek and 39 lots on the west side of the creek. The plan also showed the channeling of the creek. Mr. Staples said the construction cost for water, sewer and streets for the 39 lots on the east would be: Street-1700 LF @ $50 $85,000, 8" water system-1700 LF @ $10 = $17,000, 8" sewer system-1300 LF @ $10 = $13,000, channelization-46600 CY @ $6/CY $279,600, totaling-$394,600; on the west would be: Street-2300 LF @ $50 = $115,000, Water-2220 LF @ $10 + $22,200, Sewer-1320 LF @ $10 = 13,200, 3-MR @ $700 = $2,100, I clean- out @ $300 = $300, Relocate Existing 10" s.s. - 1400 @ $15 = $22,200, Replace 10" S.S. -1200 @ $15 = $18,000, Fill material for site grading- 8000 CY = $32,000, totaling $225,000. This would make the average price per lot for just the construction cost with no land cost to be $7,935. Mr. Staples said the average price of a lot in this area is $10,000 which includes the land and development cost. He said no . . . 1 Page 9 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 developer could afford to spend that kind of money and be able to make any profit. Mr. Staples stated that apartment renters aEe people too.· They have a right to have a place to live. Not all people in apartments are bad. He said nearly everyone here has lived in apartments at sometime in their lives. He said he lived in one while going to college. Mr. Staples said renters spend their money at the grocery stores, departmen~ stores, etc. just the same as everyone else, which brings in revenue for the city. Mr. Staples stated his client had met all the city's requirements and just wants to develop his property as it is now zoned. Mr. C. T. Beckham, 5400 Evans, Dallas, Texas, stated he received a letter from the city saying they were wanting to change the zoning of his property. He said he owns 13 acres north and adjacent to the power line with frontage on Holiday Lane. Mr. Beckham stated that he had owned this property for several years, probably since 1970. Mr. Beckham stated he previously owned 170 acres across Holiday Lane that is being developed now. He said he bougQb it 14 or 15 years ago. Mr. Beckham stated that after he bought the property he sold some off to Birdville I.S.D. Mr. Beckham said they talked to the city and found out the creek would have to be channelled to relieve the flooding problem. He said there is a sewer main lying in the channel lane. Mr. Beckham stated he relied on the Local Retail zoning when he bought the land. Mr. Beckham stated that he understood that Nor East was to go through to Rufe Snow. Mr. Beckham stated he had relied on the Local Retail zoning for 10 years. He said he was asked to share in the cost of widening Holiday Lane. . . . Page 10 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 1 Mr. Beckham stated that in regards to Holiday Lane not being a collector street - there is a sign on Loop 820. He said Holiday Lane has always been a collector street whether it was designed to be one or not. He said it is wider than the other streets in the neighborhood. Mr. Beckham stated that the previous decisions for the zoning of this property were made in good faith. Mr. Beckham said he had appeared before the equalization board about the high taxes on his property, but had had very little results. He said with his payment of high taxes for years and his payment of pro rata, he thinks the streets should be improved. Mr. Jim Anderson stated he would like to address some of Mr. Staples' comments. He stated that Mr. Staples was mistaken in regard to the original zoning of this property. Mr. Anderson stated that the official zoning maps of the city clearly show the original zoning to have been IF-9 except for a small portion west of the flo~d channel which was zoned IF-9 FP (flood plain). Mr. Anderson stated that Mr. Staples was mistaken in his remarks regarding the comprehensive plan of the city. Mr. Anderson said that most of the area is outlined in yellow which is the color code for low denisty residential. He said the Caveat Emptor rule applies both ways. The purchaser of this land knew, or should have known, that it was marginal land subject to flooding. Mr. Anderson said even a cursory examination would have shown that it was not suitable for Multi-Family or Local Retail. Mr. Anderson stated he understands the development costs are high and that is no doubt why the comprehensive plan showed a substantial portion was to be semi-public open space. Mr. Anderson stated that phase development of this tract could be a disaster because the city staff is authorized to allow the developer to defer certain improvements without consulting with either the Planning and Zoning Commision or the City Council. Page II p & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 1 . Mr. Anderson stated the property owners recognize that certain portions of the 50 acres oould support somewhat higher density than the IF-9, but they feel that IF-9 is a good overall zoning. He said if the owners wish higher density on some portions, let them request it in light of conditions as they exist today and not as they existed II years ago. Mrs. Strauser stated they came up ~ith a plan for the development of this property, but was met with negative reaction. She said that every time they would meet with the developers, all they would say was they would sue. Tom Moore, 7524 Fieldstone Drive, stated that it seems that everyone has lost sight of one or two facts here. He stated that the government is a representative of the people who elected it. Mr. Moore stated that he would say the consensus of the area do not want apartments on this property. He said the people that needs to be considered are the ones who pay all the taxes, the homeowners. . Mr. Staples stated it was very hard to speak without emotion. He stated that it is unlawful to devalue ·a person's property and take it away from him. Mr. Staples stated that the kind of government we have, the people do not vote. Mr. Staples said the people here have only talked about the traffic problem; they have no factual problems. He said the traffic is not the issue here, it is the changing of the zoning on a person's own property. Mr. Beckham said he would like to tell Mrs. Strauser that he had not been contacted about any plans for the development of this property. Phil Anderson said everyone has been here an hour and a half which has not been productive. He asked why Mr. Penticost wasn't here to talk instead of paying a professional. The Chairman asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. . There being none, the public portion of the meeting was closed. RECESS The Chairman called a short recess. ~ . Page 12 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 CALL BACK TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting back to order at 9:07 p.m. with the same members present. Jack Knowles said: "In light of the fact that this property was zoned IF-9 from 1967 to 1970, and that the General Land Use Plan, prepared by a Municipal Planning Consultant, shows this property to be low density residential area, I feel this property should not be a blanket zoning of Multi-Family. Therefore, I move to approve PZ 80-14 rezoning this property to IF-9-l5." This motion was seconed by Mrs. Nash. This motion carried 3-1 with Warren Eckhardt voting against. The Chairman stated the Planning and Zoning Commission would not take any action on PS 80-18 (the platting of this property for Multi-Family) until the City Council acts on the zoning request just heard. . PZ 80-15 DENIED Request of Colte Investments, Ltd., (Jamie's Restaurant) to rezone Lot 3, Block 2, Cochran Addition, from its present classification of Commercial to a proposed classification of Commercial-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located on the south side of Bedford-Euless Road and bounded on the West by Tarrant County Sub-courthouse. John Drake, owner of Jamie's Restaurant, stated that Jamie's is a family oriented restaurant. He said they have three restaurants-two in Dallas and one in Arlington. Mr. Drake stated their alcoholic beverage sale runs about 8% at their other restaurants. He said they basically sell hamburgers. Mr. Drake showed a drawing of the proposed building and floor plan. Mr. Knowles asked about the seating capacity. . Mr. Drake said there would be appnoximately 170 seats and 95 parking spaces. ~ . Page 13 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 Bryan Anderson, part owner of the property, said he was born and raised on this property and this is the last piece ilieft of the family tract. He said he was very pleased to have this restaurant built here. Mr. Anderson said Jamie's is a super nice place to go. The Chairman asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of this request. There being none, the Chairman asked if there was anyone in opposition. Pat Wolverton, 4800 Colorado Blvd., stated she had lived at this address half of her life. She stated she represents the property owners within 200 feet of this property. She said she turned in a petition with 7 of the 9 names of people who were contacted on it. She said the 2 names she did not get was - the Courthouse and a rent house that the owner_ lives in Las Vegas and has no interest in this area. . Mrs. Wolverton said they could not get off their street onto Bedford-Euless Road in the evenings and on weekends because of the traffic backing up from the intersection of Davis, Grapevine Hwy., and Bedford-Euless Road. Mrs. Wolverton stated she and the other neighbors are opposed to this zoning request. The Chairman asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. Bryan Anderson said he also lives on Colorado Blvd. at 5200 Colorado. He said he would like to point out that the property is already zoned "Commercial" for a restaurant, Jamie's is only asking for the Specific Use for the sale of alcoholic beverages, but they are not having a bar. Bryan Anderson said his father had said several times that he had to grow 80 acres of wheat to pay the taxes on these 3 acres of mesquite trees. . 1 Page 14 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 . The Chairman closed the public portion. Mr. Eckhardt moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to deny PZ 80-15 due to the traffic problems in the area. Motion carried 4-0 for denial. PZ 80-16 APPROVED Request of Antonio's Pizza City to rezone a portion of Lot I, North Park Plaza Addition, from its present classification of Local Retail to a proposed classification of Local Retail- Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive, just north of Eckerd Drug Store. Dorothy Alfano, represented her brother, Pete Turchiono, in his request to serve beer on premises with pizza. Mrs. Shaunty asked if they know about the 60-40 ratio. Mrs. Alfano said she wasn't sure. . Mr. Caldwell stated he had explained this 60-40 ratio to them. The Chairman asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request. Mrs. Nash moved, seconded by Mr. Knowles, to approve PZ 80-16 to the owner of Antonio's Pizza City and would make it nontransferable. The motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Eckhardt abstaining. PS 80-13 APPROVED Request of Bank of North Texas for preliminary plat of Lot 2, Block 2, Carder Addition. PS 80-14 APPROVED Request of Bank of North Texas for final plat/ of Lot 2, Block 2, Carder Addition. Mr. Jim Harris, Vice President of Bank of North Texas, stated they were platting this pvoperty after occupying it for 10 years. He said he did not know why it was never platted. He said they plan to build a 6-story building and a 4-story parking garage on this property. . Mr. Harris said he found out that TESCO had never been granted an easement they need. Mrs. Shaunty asked if he was aware of the engineer's comments. 1 Page 15 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 . Mr. Harris stated he wasn't sure, because his engineer was unable to attend this meeting. Mr. Caldwell stated that their engineer, Doug Long, came in to see him and discussed the city's engineer's comments. Jim Anderson, former director of Public Works, stated he has worked with the bank officials on this for a long time. Mr. Anderson stated that there is a severe drainage problem at the bank. He said when Charles Reynolds built the shopping center next to the bank, it caused considerable water to be dumped on the bank. Mr. Anderson stated that with the already drainage problem and the shoppping center water, the bank really has a problem. Mr. Anderson stated the bank has agreed to put in a storm drain. The Chairman asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor or in opposition to these requests. . Mr. Knowles moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-13 subject to the engineer's comments. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Knowles moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-14 subject to the engineer's connnents. Motion'.carried 4-0. PS 80-16 APPROVED Request of Larry R. Hutchens for replat of Lot lR, Block C, Hewitt Estates. Mr. Delbert Stembridge, represented Mr. Hutchens in his request. He said that Mr. Hutchens owned his lot, half of the one next to him and then bought the lot behind him. Mr. Stembridge said Mr. Hutchens wanted to build a garage on the lot behind his house, but was told he had to replat his property into I lot before he could. Mr. Stembridge stated that Mr. Hutchens agreed to the engineer's comments. . Mr. Eckhardt moved, seconded by Mr. Knowles, to approve PS 80-16 subject to the engineer's comments. Motion carried 4-0. . . . Page 16 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1980 PS 80-17 APPROVED PS 80-18 POSTPONED ADJOURNMENT cJMAvvIZ ~ Request of Conoco, Inc. for replat of Lot lR, Block B, Richland Oaks Addition. Evelyn Bursey, secretary to Bob Harvey Surveyours, said they were going to build and they needed to make the 2 lots into one. Mrs. Shaunty asked if they had received the engineer's comments. Mrs. Bursey said they had and they had added the 5 ft. utility easement that was requested on their side. She said they had asked for 10 ft. - 5 ft. on each side of the property line, but Conoco has no jurisdiction on the property next to them. The Chairman asked if there was anyone who wished to speak regarding this request. There was no one. Mr. Eckhardt moved, seconded by Mrs. Nash, to approve PS 80-17 subject to the engineer's comments. Motion carried 4-0. Request of Dal-Worth Developers, Inc. for final plat of Holiday North, Section 7. No action taken. The meeting adjourned at 10:00 P.M. /)r¡..,. 9 ~.~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION